UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

 


FORM 10-Q

 


(Mark One)

xQUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

For the quarterly period ended January 2,December 31, 2004

 

OR

 

¨TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

For the transition period from                    to                    

 

Commission file number 1-5517


 

SCIENTIFIC-ATLANTA, INC.

(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)

 


Georgia 58-0612397

(State or other jurisdiction of


incorporation or organization)

 

(I.R.S. Employer


Identification Number)

5030 Sugarloaf Parkway

Lawrenceville, Georgia

 30042-5447
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)

 

770-236-5000

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

 


Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Yesxþ    No¨

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined by Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

Yesxþ    No¨

 

As of January 30, 2004,28, 2005, Scientific-Atlanta, Inc. had outstanding 152,523,836152,061,822 shares of common stock.

 


1 of 36


PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION

 

SCIENTIFIC-ATLANTA, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EARNINGS

(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)

(UNAUDITED)

 

  Three Months Ended

 Six Months Ended

   Three Months Ended

 Six Months Ended

 
  January 2,
2004


 

December 27,

2002


 January 2,
2004


 

December 27,

2002


   December 31,
2004


 January 2,
2004


 December 31,
2004


 January 2,
2004


 

SALES

  $416,566  $352,008  $812,202  $663,563   $441,672  $416,566  $894,346  $812,202 
  


 


 


 


COSTS AND EXPENSES

      

Cost of sales

   259,204   240,638   507,582   439,469    277,951   259,204   564,826   507,582 

Sales and administrative

   47,973   48,009   96,010   95,033    47,893   47,973   96,654   96,010 

Research and development

   36,015   36,808   71,338   76,623    37,881   36,015   76,222   71,338 

Restructuring

   598   2,566   1,313   11,235    (8)  598   (12)  1,313 

Interest expense

   204   247   439   1,097    174   204   331   439 

Interest income

   (4,188)  (5,817)  (8,040)  (11,682)   (6,765)  (4,188)  (12,539)  (8,040)

Other (income) expense, net

   (2,208)  6,604   (1,307)  12,118    1,020   (2,208)  855   (1,307)
  


 


 


 


  


 


 


 


Total costs and expenses

   337,598   329,055   667,335   623,893    358,146   337,598   726,337   667,335 
  


 


 


 


  


 


 


 


EARNINGS BEFORE INCOME TAXES

   78,968   22,953   144,867   39,670    83,526   78,968   168,009   144,867 

PROVISION FOR (BENEFIT FROM) INCOME TAXES

      

Current

   24,219   15,879   42,592   27,203    23,925   24,219   56,632   42,592 

Deferred

   3,618   (8,074)  8,474   (13,695)   908   3,618   (3,194)  8,474 
  


 


 


 


  


 


 


 


NET EARNINGS

  $51,131  $15,148  $93,801  $26,162   $58,693  $51,131  $114,571  $93,801 
  


 


 


 


  


 


 


 


EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE

      

BASIC

  $0.34  $0.10  $0.62  $0.17   $0.39  $0.34  $0.75  $0.62 
  


 


 


 


  


 


 


 


DILUTED

  $0.33  $0.10  $0.61  $0.17   $0.38  $0.33  $0.74  $0.61 
  


 


 


 


  


 


 


 


WEIGHTED AVERAGE NUMBER OF COMMON SHARES OUTSTANDING

      

BASIC

   151,874   154,380   151,418   154,754    152,395   151,874   152,913   151,418 
  


 


 


 


  


 


 


 


DILUTED

   154,510   154,754   154,153   155,232    154,510   154,510   154,973   154,153 
  


 


 


 


  


 


 


 


DIVIDENDS PER SHARE PAID

  $0.01  $0.01  $0.02  $0.02   $0.01  $0.01  $0.02  $0.02 
  


 


 


 


  


 


 


 


 

SEE ACCOMPANYING NOTES

 

2 of 3336


SCIENTIFIC-ATLANTA, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF FINANCIAL POSITION

(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT SHARE DATA)

(UNAUDITED)

 

  January 2,
2004


  June 27,
2003


  December 31,
2004


  July 2,
2004


ASSETS

            

CURRENT ASSETS

            

Cash and cash equivalents

  $450,473  $359,780  $339,585  $442,182

Short-term investments

   646,119   588,775   976,040   855,434

Receivables, less allowance for doubtful accounts of $3,403 at January 2 and $3,260 at June 27

   230,837   184,585

Receivables, less allowance for doubtful accounts of $2,514 at December 31 and $3,102 at July 2

   228,723   219,172

Inventories

   127,619   127,054   125,742   129,930

Income tax receivables

   682   18,903

Deferred income taxes

   32,840   41,874   24,646   23,657

Other current assets

   22,710   21,548   16,927   18,434
  

  

  

  

TOTAL CURRENT ASSETS

   1,510,598   1,323,616   1,712,345   1,707,712
  

  

  

  

PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT, at cost

            

Land and improvements

   22,214   22,139   23,882   21,223

Building and improvements

   83,997   83,624

Buildings and improvements

   116,130   83,713

Machinery and equipment

   223,591   219,647   234,642   212,392
  

  

  

  

   329,802   325,410   374,654   317,328

Less – Accumulated depreciation and amortization

   141,147   127,726
  

  

Less - Accumulated depreciation and amortization

   152,269   132,744
   188,655   197,684  

  

  

  

   222,385   184,584

GOODWILL

   245,474   235,248   236,786   235,209

INTANGIBLE ASSETS

   45,944   51,028   31,951   37,636

NON-CURRENT MARKETABLE SECURITIES

   3,570   8,367

DEFERRED INCOME TAXES

   26,060   38,200   38,184   30,867

OTHER ASSETS

   73,489   64,486   79,920   73,619
  

  

  

  

TOTAL ASSETS

  $2,093,790  $1,918,629  $2,321,571  $2,269,627
  

  

  

  

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

            

CURRENT LIABILITIES

            

Current maturities of long-term debt

  $1,599  $1,455  $1,393  $1,265

Accounts payable

   159,671   143,379   138,134   171,589

Accrued liabilities

   88,054   100,876   84,543   101,132

Deferred revenue

   15,321   15,626   15,132   18,053

Income taxes currently payable

   24,881   12,273   13,673   13,663
  

  

  

  

TOTAL CURRENT LIABILITIES

   289,526   273,609   252,875   305,702
  

  

  

  

LONG-TERM DEBT, LESS CURRENT MATURITIES

   8,671   8,567   7,772   7,698

NON-CURRENT DEFERRED REVENUE

   6,851   6,507   8,648   7,885

OTHER LIABILITIES

   140,564   148,705   158,626   144,985

STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

            

Preferred stock, authorized 50,000,000 shares; no shares issued

   —     —     —     —  

Common stock, $0.50 par value, authorized 350,000,000 shares; issued 164,992,376 shares at January 2 and June 27

   82,496   82,496

Common stock, $0.50 par value, authorized 350,000,000 shares; issued 164,992,376 shares at December 31 and July 2

   82,496   82,496

Additional paid-in capital

   552,108   520,503   563,308   561,636

Retained earnings

   1,187,078   1,127,441   1,410,302   1,300,691

Accumulated other comprehensive income, net of taxes of $24,864 at January 2 and $13,169 at June 27

   40,568   21,486

Accumulated other comprehensive income, net of taxes of $29,153 at December 31 and $19,506 at July 2

   58,311   39,516
  

  

  

  

   1,862,250   1,751,926   2,114,417   1,984,339

Less –Treasury stock, at cost (13,030,022 shares at January 2 and 15,550,442 shares at June 27)

   214,072   270,685

Less - Treasury stock, at cost (12,997,424 shares at December 31 and 11,614,954 shares at July 2)

   220,767   180,982
  

  

  

  

   1,648,178   1,481,241   1,893,650   1,803,357
  

  

  

  

TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

  $2,093,790  $1,918,629  $2,321,571  $2,269,627
  

  

  

  

 

SEE ACCOMPANYING NOTES

 

3 of 3336


SCIENTIFIC-ATLANTA, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(IN THOUSANDS)

(UNAUDITED)

 

  Six Months Ended

   Six Months Ended

 
  January 2,
2004


 December 27,
2002


   December 31,
2004


 January 2,
2004


 

NET CASH PROVIDED BY OPERATING ACTIVITIES

  $118,247  $114,442   $130,083  $122,279 
  


 


  


 


INVESTING ACTIVITIES:

      

Purchases of short-term investments, net

   (58,618)  (31,818)

Purchases of short-term investments

   (1,158,249)  (919,190)

Proceeds from sales of short-term investments

   1,032,814   871,150 

Purchases of property, plant, and equipment

   (11,605)  (14,321)   (58,071)  (11,605)

Purchase of shares of PowerTV

   —     (4,580)

Proceeds from the sales of investments

   13,583   1,763 

Proceeds from the settlement of a collar on a warrant to purchase shares of common stock

   —     20,821 

Payment of purchase price adjustment on businesses sold to ViaSat, Inc.

   (9,000)  —   

Acquisition of certain assets of Arris Group

   —     (30,000)

Acquisition of certain assets of ChanneLogics, Inc.

   —     (1,600)

Proceeds from the sale of an investment in a marketable security

   —     13,583 

Payment of purchase price adjustment on business sold to ViaSat, Inc.

   —     (9,000)

Other

   334   6    157   334 
  


 


  


 


Net cash used in investing activities

   (65,306)  (59,729)   (183,349)  (54,728)
  


 


  


 


FINANCING ACTIVITIES:

      

Issuance of common stock pursuant to employee stock option and stock purchase plans

   41,359   1,938 

Treasury shares acquired

   —     (32,410)

Purchases of common stock

   (50,703)  —   

Issuance of common stock from treasury

   5,049   41,359 

Dividends paid

   (3,032)  (3,086)   (3,052)  (3,032)

Principal payments on debt, net

   (575)  (1,039)

Principal payments on debt

   (625)  (575)
  


 


  


 


Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities

   37,752   (34,597)   (49,331)  37,752 
  


 


  


 


INCREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS

   90,693   20,116 

INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS

   (102,597)  105,303 

CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT BEGINNING OF PERIOD

   359,780   376,429    442,182   332,266 
  


 


  


 


CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT END OF PERIOD

  $450,473  $396,545   $339,585  $437,569 
  


 


  


 


SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW DISCLOSURES

      

Cash paid during the period:

      

Interest

  $408  $1,058   $296  $408 
  


 


  


 


Income taxes paid (refunded), net

  $15,523  $(25,402)

Income taxes paid, net

  $37,147  $15,523 
  


 


  


 


 

SEE ACCOMPANYING NOTES

 

4 of 3336


SCIENTIFIC-ATLANTA,SCIENTIFIC ATLANTA, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

(IN THOUSANDS)

(UNAUDITED)

 

   Three Months Ended

  Six Months Ended

 
   

January 2,

2004


  December 27,
2002


  

January 2,

2004


  

December 27,

2002


 

NET EARNINGS

  $51,131  $15,148  $93,801  $26,162 

OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME, NET OF TAX(1)

                 

Unrealized holding gains (losses) on short-term investments

   (328)  —     233   —   

Unrealized holding gains (losses) on marketable securities, net(2)

   759   1,124   459   (162)

Foreign currency translation adjustments

   14,466   8,324   18,348   6,812 

Changes in fair value of derivatives

   153   50   42   884 
   


 

  

  


COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

  $66,181  $24,646  $112,883  $33,696 
   


 

  

  



   Three Months Ended

  Six Months Ended

   December 31,
2004


  January 2,
2004


  December 31,
2004


  January 2,
2004


NET EARNINGS

  $58,693  $51,131  $114,571  $93,801

OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME, NET OF TAX(1)

                

Net foreign currency translation adjustments

   18,229   14,466   19,221   18,348

Net unrealized holding gains (losses) on short-term investments

   (1,007)  (328)  (803)  233

Net unrealized holding gains (losses) on available-for-sale marketable securities, net of reclassification adjustments of $0 and $876 in the three and six months ended December 31, 2004 and January 2, 2004, respectively.

   (3)  759   —     459

Net change in fair value of derivatives

   110   153   377   42
   


 


 


 

COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

  $76,022  $66,181  $133,366  $112,883
   


 


 


 

(1)Assumed tax rate of 34 percent and 38 percent tax infor fiscal yearsyear 2005 and 2004, and 2003.
(2)Net of reclassification adjustments of $876 in the three and six months ended January 2, 2004 and $1,916 and $4,170 in the three and six months ended December 27, 2002, respectively.

 

SEE ACCOMPANYING NOTES

 

5 of 3336


NOTES:

NOTES:

(Amounts in thousands, except share and per share data)

 

A.The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Scientific-Atlanta, Inc. (Scientific-Atlanta) and all subsidiaries after elimination of all material intercompany accounts and transactions. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States have been condensed or omitted pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. These condensed financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and related notes contained in our fiscal year 20032004 Annual Report on Form 10-K. The financial information presented in the accompanying statements reflects all adjustments which are, in the opinion of management, necessary for a fair presentation of the periods indicated. All such adjustments, except as described in the next paragraph, are of a normal recurring nature.

During fiscal year 2004, we identified certain cash equivalents and short-term investments which were misclassified. We have reclassified $12,904 and $27,514 from Cash and cash equivalents to Short-term investments at January 2, 2004 and June 27, 2003, respectively. The Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the six months ended January 2, 2004 has been restated to reflect these adjustments.

 

Scientific-Atlanta’s fiscal year ends on the Friday closest to June 30 of each year. Fiscal year 2004,2005, which ends on July 2, 2004,1, 2005, will include fifty threefifty-two weeks. The second quarter of fiscal year 20042005 and 20032004 each included thirteen weeks. The six months ended January 2,December 31, 2004 included twenty seventwenty-six weeks while the six months ended December 27, 2002January 2, 2004 included twenty sixtwenty-seven weeks.

 

B.Basic earnings per share were computed based on the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding. Diluted earnings per share were computed based on the weighted average number of outstanding common shares and potentially dilutive shares.

 

Basic and diluted earnings per share are computed as follows:

 

   In Thousands

  

Per Share

Amount


 
   Net Earnings

  Shares

  

Quarter Ended January 2, 2004

            

Basic earnings per common share

  $51,131  151,874  $0.34 

Effect of dilutive stock options

   —    2,636   (0.01)
   

  
  


Diluted earnings per common share

  $51,131  154,510  $0.33 
   

  
  


   In Thousands

  

Per Share

Amount


   Net Earnings

  Shares

  

Quarter Ended December 27, 2002

           

Basic earnings per common share

  $15,148  154,380  $0.10

Effect of dilutive stock options

   —    374   —  
   

  
  

Diluted earnings per common share

  $15,148  154,754  $0.10
   

  
  

   In Thousands

  

Per Share

Amount


 
   Net Earnings

  Shares

  

Six Months Ended January 2, 2004

            

Basic earnings per common share

  $93,801  151,418  $0.62 

Effect of dilutive stock options

   —    2,735   (0.01)
   

  
  


Diluted earnings per common share

  $93,801  154,153  $0.61 
   

  
  


  In Thousands

  

Per Share

Amount


  In Thousands

  

Per Share
Amount


 
  Net Earnings

  Shares

    Net
Earnings


  Shares

  

Six Months Ended December 27, 2002

         

Quarter Ended December 31, 2004

         

Basic earnings per common share

  $26,162  154,754  $0.17  $58,693  152,395  $0.39 

Effect of dilutive stock options

   —    478   —     —    2,115   (0.01)
  

  
  

  

  
  


Diluted earnings per common share

  $26,162  155,232  $0.17  $58,693  154,510  $0.38 
  

  
  

  

  
  


Quarter Ended January 2, 2004

         

Basic earnings per common share

  $51,131  151,874  $0.34 

Effect of dilutive stock options

   —    2,636   (0.01)
  

  
  


Diluted earnings per common share

  $51,131  154,510  $0.33 
  

  
  


Six Months Ended December 31, 2004

         

Basic earnings per common share

  $114,571  152,913  $0.75 

Effect of dilutive stock options

   —    2,060   (0.01)
  

  
  


Diluted earnings per common share

  $114,571  154,973  $0.74 
  

  
  


Six Months Ended January 2, 2004

         

Basic earnings per common share

  $93,801  151,418  $0.62 

Effect of dilutive stock options

   —    2,735   (0.01)
  

  
  


Diluted earnings per common share

  $93,801  154,153  $0.61 
  

  
  


 

6 of 3336


The following information pertains to options to purchase shares of common stock which were not included in the computation of diluted earnings per common share because the option’s exercise price was greater than the average market price of the common shares:

 

  January 2,
2004


  December 27,
2002


  December 31,
2004


  January 2,
2004


Number of options outstanding

   8,825,177   16,151,386   11,804,216   8,825,177

Weighted average exercise price

  $52.72  $40.00  $47.39  $52.72

 

C.We have elected to account for option plans under Accounting Principles Board (APB) Opinion No. 25 “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees”, which generally requires compensation costs for fixed awards to be recognized only when the option price differs from the market price at the grant date. Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 123 “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation” and No. 148 “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation-Transition and Disclosure” allow a company to follow APB Opinion No. 25 with the following additional disclosure that shows what our net earnings and earnings per share would have been using the fair value compensation model under SFAS No. 123:

 

  Three Months Ended

 Six Months Ended

   Three Months Ended

  Six Months Ended

  

January 2,

2004


  

December 27,

2002


 

January 2,

2004


  

December 27,

2002


   December 31,
2004


  January 2,
2004


  December 31,
2004


  January 2,
2004


Net earnings as reported

  $51,131  $15,148  $93,801  $26,162   $58,693  $51,131  $114,571  $93,801

Deduct: Pro forma compensation expense, net of tax

   9,310   16,973   20,787   35,058    7,719   9,310   15,546   20,787
  

  


 

  


  

  

  

  

Pro forma net earnings (loss)

  $41,821  $(1,825) $73,014  $(8,896)

Pro forma net earnings

  $50,974  $41,821  $99,025  $73,014
  

  


 

  


  

  

  

  

Earnings (loss) per share:

         

Earnings per share:

            

Basic

                     

As reported

  $0.34  $0.10  $0.62  $0.17   $0.39  $0.34  $0.75  $0.62
  

  


 

  


  

  

  

  

Pro forma

  $0.28  $(0.01) $0.48  $(0.06)  $0.33  $0.28  $0.65  $0.48
  

  


 

  


  

  

  

  

Diluted

                     

As reported

  $0.33  $0.10  $0.61  $0.17   $0.38  $0.33  $0.74  $0.61
  

  


 

  


  

  

  

  

Pro forma

  $0.27  $(0.01) $0.47  $(0.06)  $0.33  $0.27  $0.63  $0.47
  

  


 

  


  

  

  

  

 

The fair value of each option grant is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model which resulted in a weighted-averageweighted average fair value of $19.09$14.21 and $7.87$19.09 per option for grants in the second quarter of fiscal years 2005 and 2004, respectively, and 2003,$15.28 and $19.84 and $7.93 per option for grants in the six months ended December 31 and January 2, 2004, and December 27, 2002, respectively. The following weighted-average assumptions were used in the pricing model for grants in the three and six months ended December 31, 2004 and January 2, 2004 and December 27, 2002:2004:

 

  Three Months Ended

 Six Months Ended

   Three Months Ended

 Six Months Ended

 
  

January 2,

2004


 

December 27,

2002


 

January 2,

2004


 

December 27,

2002


   December 31,
2004


 January 2,
2004


 December 31,
2004


 January 2,
2004


 

Risk free interest rate

   4.33%  3.13%  4.33%  3.15%   3.22%  4.33%  3.38%  4.33%

Expected term

   5 years   5 years   5 years   5 years    4.7 years   5.0 years   4.8 years   5.0 years 

Volatility

   75.95%  79.60%  77.55%  79.60%   60%  76%  65%  76%

Expected annual dividends

  $0.04  $0.04  $0.04  $0.04   $0.04  $0.04  $0.04  $0.04 

 

We periodically compare our assumptions used in the pricing model for stock option grants with historical trends. During the second quarter of fiscal year 2005, we determined that the expected term of our stock option grants was 4.7 years rather than 5.0 years and we have adjusted our assumptions accordingly.

7 of 36


D.Inventories consist of the following:

 

  January 2,
2004


  

June 27,

2003


  December 31,
2004


  July 2,
2004


Raw materials and work-in-process

  $92,531  $82,890  $82,558  $99,872

Finished goods

   35,088   44,164   43,184   30,058
  

  

  

  

Total inventory

  $127,619  $127,054  $125,742  $129,930
  

  

  

  

 

7 of 33


E.During the three and six months ended December 27, 2002,31, 2004, we purchased 2,685,2001,836,600 shares of our common stock at an aggregate cost of $32,410$50,703 pursuant to a program announced in July 2001February 2003 to buy back up to 8,000,00010,000,000 shares. At December 31, 2004, there were 7,604,700 shares available that may yet be purchased under this plan. No shares were purchased during the three or six months ended January 2, 2004.

 

F.Other incomeexpense of $2,208$1,020 and $855 for the three and six months ended January 2,December 31, 2004, respectively, included a gain of $6,755losses on short-term investments and from the sale of shares of Kabelnetz NRW Limited (Kabelnetz), which had been received as part of the termination settlement with German cable operator ish GmbH & Co. KG (ish)other-than-temporary decline in the second quarterfair value of fiscal year 2003, foreign exchangean investment in a privately-held company, gains gainsfrom the increase in the cash surrender value of life insurance, partnership income, foreign exchange losses, and gains from various other items, none of which was individually significant. We also recorded a loss of $6.1 million from the settlement of purchase price adjustments, which included a cash payment of $9.0 million, related to the sale of the satellite networks business to ViaSat. In connection with this transaction, we utilized $2.9 million of liabilities which had been previously established related to indemnifications to ViaSat, primarily for warranty.

Other income of $2,208 for the three months ended January 2, 2004 included a gain of $6,755 from the sale of shares of Kabelnetz NRW Limited (Kabelnetz), which had been received as part of the termination settlement with German cable operator ish GmbH & Co. KG (ish) in the second quarter of fiscal year 2003, foreign exchange gains, gains from the increase in the cash surrender value of life insurance and gains from various other items, none of which was individually significant. We also recorded a loss of $6,147 from the settlement of purchase price adjustments, which included a cash payment of $9,000, related to the sale of the satellite networks business to ViaSat, Inc. (ViaSat), of which $2,853 had been previously reserved for.

 

In addition to the gain from the sale of shares of Kabelnetz and the loss from the settlement of purchase price adjustments with ViaSat described above, other income of $1,307 for the six months ended January 2, 2004 included a gain of $1,907 from the sale of a marketable security, charges of $1,831 from other-than-temporary declines in the value of investments in privately-held companies, foreign exchange losses and losses from various other items, none of which was individually significant.

 

Other expense of $6,604 for the quarter ended December 27, 2002 included $6,465 of losses from other-than-temporary declines in the market value of marketable securities and investments in privately-held companies. Other expense of $12,118 for the six months ended December 27, 2002 included losses of $11,042 from other-than-temporary declines in the market value of marketable securities and investments in privately-held companies and $1,899 from the decline in the cash surrender value of life insurance. These losses were partially offset by net gain of $2,491 from the settlement of a collar on a warrant to purchase common stock of a public company and the related warrant. There were no other significant items in other (income) expense for the three or six months ended December 27, 2002.

G.The provisionWe have a defined benefit pension plan covering substantially all of our domestic employees. Pension expense for doubtful accounts, which is included in sales and administrative expenses, is as follows:this plan consists of the following:

 

Three Months Ended

 Six Months Ended

January 2,

2004


 

December 27,

2002


 

January 2,

2004


 

December 27,

2002


$776 $1,109 $738 $1,980
   Three Months Ended

  Six Months Ended

 
   December 31,
2004


  January 2,
2004


  December 31,
2004


  January 2,
2004


 

Service cost

  $1,914  $1,757  $3,828  $3,514 

Interest cost

   1,379   1,397   2,758   2,794 

Expected return on plan assets

   (1,691)  (1,627)  (3,382)  (3,254)

Amortization of transition net asset

   (12)  (12)  (24)  (24)

Amortization of prior service cost

   7   7   14   14 

Amortization of net actuarial loss

   46   —     92   —   
   


 


 


 


Pension expense

  $1,643  $1,522  $3,286  $3,044 
   


 


 


 


 

H.During the second quarter of fiscal year 2003, we acquired certain assets of the transmission product lines of Arris for a cash payment of $31,610. These assets were recorded at their estimated fair value at the date of acquisition. The purchase price has been allocated to the assets acquired including $12,423 of goodwill and $10,830 of other identifiable intangible assets (primarily existing technology and customer base, which are being amortized over varying periods up to four years).

During the first quarter of fiscal year 2005, we made a contribution of $3,594 to the defined benefit pension plan. We believe no additional contributions will be made to the defined benefit pension plan in fiscal year 2005.

8 of 36


We also have unfunded defined benefit retirement plans for certain key officers and non-employee directors. Pension expense for these plans consists of the following:

   Three Months Ended

  Six Months Ended

   December 31,
2004


  January 2,
2004


  December 31,
2004


  January 2,
2004


Service cost

  $341  $379  $682  $758

Interest cost

   532   566   1,064   1,132

Amortization of prior service cost

   47   47   94   94

Amortization of net actuarial loss

   428   243   856   486
   

  

  

  

Pension expense

  $1,348  $1,235  $2,696  $2,470
   

  

  

  

 

In addition to providing pension benefits, we acquiredhave contributory plans that provide certain health care and life insurance benefits to retired employees. The components of postretirement benefit expense consist of the software, technology and other assets of ChanneLogics, Inc. (ChanneLogics) for $1,600 of cash. The acquired assets were recorded at their estimated fair value at the date of acquisition. The purchase price of ChanneLogics has been allocated to the assets acquired including $539 of goodwill and $550 of other identifiable intangible assets (primarily existing technology, which are being amortized over varying periods of up to five years).following:

 

In July 2002, we acquired a portion of the shares held by the minority shareholders of PowerTV, Inc., a majority-owned subsidiary, for $4,580 of cash. The entire purchase price was recorded as goodwill.

   Three Months Ended

  Six Months Ended

   December 31,
2004


  January 2,
2004


  December 31,
2004


  January 2,
2004


Service cost

  $13  $12  $26  $24

Interest cost

   169   183   338   366

Amortization of prior service cost

   11   11   22   22

Amortization of net actuarial loss

   65   51   130   102
   

  

  

  

Postretirement expense

  $258  $257  $516  $514
   

  

  

  

 

I.H.In August 2002, we announced a restructuring of our worldwide operations to align our costs with reduced sales levels. The restructuring included a reduction of our workforce by 400 positions, or approximately 6 percent of our total workforce, and was substantially completed by December 27, 2002. The positions eliminated were from manufacturing, engineering, marketing, sales, service and administrative functions. The restructuring also included the consolidation of certain office and manufacturing facilities. In addition, during the third quarter of fiscal year 2003, we reduced our workforce by approximately 120 positions, primarily in sales and other functions within the transmission businesses,sector, and reduced our workforce by an additional 30 positions in the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2003.

 

During the six months ended January 2,December 31, 2004, severance costs of $1,193$23 were paid to approximately 40 employees whose positions had been eliminated under the restructuring plan.

 

8 of 33


The following reconciles the beginning restructuring liability at June 27, 2003July 2, 2004, which consisted of an accrual for contractual obligations under a canceled lease, to the restructuring liability at January 2,December 31, 2004:

 

  Contractual
Obligations Under
Canceled Leases


 Severance

 Other

 Total

   Contractual
Obligations Under
a Canceled Lease


 Severance

 Total

 

Balance at June 27, 2003

  $3,309  $223  $—    $3,532 

Balance at July 2, 2004

  $1,324  $—    $1,324 

Restructuring provision

   17   1,036   260   1,313    —     23   23 

Charges to the reserve

   (1,118)  (1,193)  (260)  (2,571)   (723)  (23)  (746)

Adjustments

   (35)  —     (35)
  


 


 


 


  


 


 


Balance at January 2, 2004

  $2,208  $66  $(0) $2,274 

Balance at December 31, 2004

  $566  $—    $566 
  


 


 


 


  


 


 


 

Since the initiation of these restructurings, we have incurred expenses of $5,857$5,898 from the write-off of fixed assets, $6,625$6,519 from contractual obligations under canceled leases, $27,411$27,517 from severance and $7,030$6,989 from other miscellaneous costs.

9 of 36


I.The following is a summary of depreciation and amortization expense:

   Three Months Ended

  Six Months Ended

   December 31,
2004


  January 2,
2004


  December 31,
2004


  January 2,
2004


Depreciation expense

  $11,467  $11,057  $23,073  $22,332

Amortization expense:

                

Intangible assets

   3,729   3,732   7,578   7,419

Capitalized software

   3,298   1,685   5,593   3,988

Premiums on short-term investments

   1,931   2,022   4,206   4,032
   

  

  

  

Total

  $20,425  $18,496  $40,450  $37,771
   

  

  

  

 

J.We offer warranties of various lengths to our customers depending on the specific product and the terms of the agreements with the customer. Our standard warranties require us to repair or replace defective product returned to us during the warranty period at no cost to the customer. We record an estimate for warranty-related costs based on our actual historical and/or projected failure rates and repair costs at the time of sale. We repair products in our manufacturing facilities and also outsource warranty repairs. Historical and/or projected failure rates and repair costs are reviewed and the estimated warranty liability is adjusted, if required, quarterly. In addition, for certain purchased products, such as cable modems and hard drives, included in our set-tops, we provide the same warranty coverage to our customers as the supplier of the products provides to us. Expenses related to unusual product warranty problems and product defects are recorded in the period the problem is identified.

 

We offer extended warranties on certain products. Revenue from these extended warranty agreements is deferred at the time of the sale and recognized in future periods according to the terms of the warranty agreement. The warranty liability at January 2,December 31, 2004 consisted of $13,276$15,562 in Accrued liabilities and $20,757$26,004 in Other liabilities in the Consolidated Statements of Financial Position.

 

The following reconciles the beginning warranty liability at June 27, 2003July 2, 2004 to the warranty liability at January 2,December 31, 2004:

 

Accrued warranty at June 27, 2003

  $36,001 

Accrued warranty at July 2, 2004

  $36,233 

Reductions for payments

   (10,033)   (10,607)

Additions for warranties issued during the period

   9,472    11,680 

Other adjustments

   (1,407)   4,260 
  


  


Accrued warranty at January 2, 2004

  $34,033 

Accrued warranty at December 31, 2004

  $41,566 
  


  


Other adjustments include changes in failure rates and costs to repair and adjustments for products whose warranty has expired.

 

K.Accounting Principles Board (APB) Opinion 6 “StatusU.S. income taxes, net of Accounting Research Bulletins” includes provisions relatedapplicable credits, have been provided on the undistributed earnings of foreign subsidiaries, except in those instances where the earnings are expected to certain treasury stock transactions which require that the excessbe indefinitely reinvested. Scientific-Atlanta currently intends to indefinitely reinvest approximately $37,000 of the issuance price over the acquisition costundistributed earnings of treasury stocka foreign subsidiary; however, this amount may be credited to paidadjusted based on changes in capital. The excessbusiness, economic or other conditions. At December 31, 2004, approximately $18,000 of the acquisition cost over the re-issuance price of treasury stock is charged to paid in capital but is limited to the amount previously credited to paid in capital. Any excess is charged to retained earnings.such undistributed earnings had been indefinitely reinvested.

 

The effective tax rate for the three months ended December 31, 2004 was 30 percent of pre-tax earnings, down from 35 percent in the prior year, due primarily to various discrete items in the quarter, the most significant of which was the reversal of valuation allowances on certain deferred tax assets. During the quarter ended December 31, 2004, we determined that valuation allowances on deferred tax assets related to net operating loss carryforwards generated by certain operations in Europe were no longer needed due to the recent and projected profitability of these operations. In addition, the second quarterrate was favorably impacted by the legislative, retroactive reinstatement, on October 4, 2004, of the research tax credit to June 30, 2004.

We believe that our effective tax rate will be approximately 33 percent of pre-tax earnings for fiscal year 2004, we identified transactions which had resulted in charges to paid in capital in excess of credits from treasury stock transactions and reclassified $31,131 from paid in capital to retained earnings. This reclassification of $31,131 included $10,507 and $20,624 related to treasury stock transactions in fiscal years 2004 and 2003, respectively.2005.

 

L.We perform an annual goodwill impairment testtests to identify potential impairment by comparing the fair value of the reporting unit with its net book value, including goodwill. We test for impairment at the operating segment level (subscriber and transmission). Estimates of fair value are determined using discounted cash flows and market comparisons. We perform internal valuation analyses and consider other market information that is publicly available. These analyses use significant estimates and assumptions, including projected future cash flows (including timing), discount rates reflecting the risk inherent in future cash flows, determination of appropriate comparables and the determination of whether a premium or discount should be applied to comparables. These estimates and assumptions are reviewed and updated annually based on actual results and future projections. Changes in these estimates and assumptions may result in a determination that goodwill is impaired and could have a significant impact on our operating results.

 

10 of 36


In addition to our annual impairment test, Scientific-Atlanta continually evaluates whether events and circumstances have occurred that indicate that the remaining balance of goodwill may not be recoverable. The results of our assessments did not result in any determination of an impairment of goodwill during the first six months of fiscal year 2005.

M.We operate in one reportable segment, the Broadband segment, which consists of our subscriber and transmission operating segments. We have combined these operating segments into a single reportable segment under the aggregation criteria of SFAS No. 131, “Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information.” Operating segments may be aggregated into a single operating segment if the segments have similar economic characteristics, and if the segments are similar in 1) the nature of products and services; 2) the nature of production processes; 3) the type or class of customer for their products and services; 4) the methods used to distribute their products or provide their services; and 5) the nature of the regulatory environment. We believe our subscriber and transmission operating segments meet all of these criteria and that aggregation is consistent with the objective and basic principles of SFAS No. 131.

N.The following disclosure related to a contingencycontingencies was included in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 27, 2003July 2, 2004 and continues to be relevant.

 

9 of 33


Adelphia Communications Corporation (Adelphia), a significant customer of Scientific-Atlanta, filed for bankruptcy protection under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code in June 2002. In the third quarter of fiscal year 2002, during the 90 days prior to such filing by Adelphia, we received payments from Adelphia for goods sold and delivered of approximately $67,000. We$67,000, and we are unable to predict the portion, if any, of this amount which might be the subject of avoidance claims by the Chapter 11 estate of Adelphia in connection with its bankruptcy proceeding. During fiscal year 2004, we entered into a tolling agreement for any potential claims by the Adelphia estate where the statute of limitation has not yet run.

 

N.O.The Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) recently issued FASB Staff Position (FSP) No. 106-1106-2, “Accounting and Disclosure Requirements Related to the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement and Modernization Act of 2003”, SFAS2003.” FSP No. 132 (revised 2003) “Employers’ Disclosures about Pensions106-2 provides guidance related to the accounting for and Other Postretirement Benefits”, Interpretationdisclosure of, including the deferral of recognition of, a federal subsidy to sponsors of retiree health care benefit plans that provide a benefit that is at least actuarially equivalent to Medicare Part D provided under the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement and Modernization Act of 2003. FSP No. 46 “Consolidation106-2 is effective for interim or annual financial statements of Variable Interest Entities”fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2004. We have elected to defer the recognition of the impact of the new Medicare provisions under a provision of FSP No. 106-2 until fiscal year 2006. The effect of the subsidy is to reduce the plan’s accumulated postretirement benefit obligation by approximately $1,132 and Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) No. 00-21 “Accountingthe net periodic postretirement benefit cost by approximately $148 for Revenue Arrangements with Multiple Deliverables” and ratified the consensus reached by the EITF on Issue 03-5, “Applicability of AICPA Statement 97-2, Software Revenue Recognition, to Non-Software Deliverables in an Arrangement Containing More-Than-Incidental Software.”fiscal year 2005.

 

FSPIn December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 106-1 provides guidance related123R, “Share-Based Payment,” which requires all companies to the accountingmeasure compensation cost for and disclosure of,all share-based payments, including the deferral of recognition of, a federal subsidy to sponsors of retiree health care benefit plans that provide a benefit that isemployee stock options, at least actuarially equivalent to Medicare Part D provided under the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement and Modernization Act of 2003 (the ACT). FSP No. 106-1 isfair value effective for public companies for interim or annual financial statements of fiscal years ending after December 7, 2003. We are currently evaluating the impact of the ACT and the alternatives provided in FSP No. 106-1. We are unable to predict at this time the impact of the ACT and the provisions of FSP No. 106-1 on our results of operations or financial position.

SFAS No. 132 requires additional disclosures about assets, obligations, cash flows and net periodic benefit cost of defined benefit plans and other postretirement benefit plans. The provisions of this Statement are effective for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2003 and for interim periods beginning after December 15, 2003. We plan to adopt the interim period disclosure provisions of SFAS No. 132 in the third quarter of fiscal year 2004.

Interpretation No. 46 addresses the consolidation by a reporting entity of variable interest entities with certain characteristics. This Interpretation was effective in January 2003 for variable interest entities created after January 31, 2003 and in the first fiscal year or interim period beginning after June 15, 2003. The FASB has issued FSPs which have deferred the effective date for applying the provisions of Interpretation2005. Scientific-Atlanta will adopt SFAS No. 46 for interests in certain variable interest entities or potential variable interest entities created before February 1, 2003 until the end of the first interim period ending after March 15, 2004. These FSPs also require certain disclosures about variable interest entities and potential variable interest entities.

We are still assessing the impact of Interpretation No. 46 on arrangements that we have with certain entities and therefore, are deferring the application of its provisions until the third quarter of fiscal year 2004. We have tentatively identified two entities that might require consolidation as variable interest entities under the provisions of Interpretation No. 46. One entity is a limited liability company, in which we have an equity interest, which licenses certain technology, receives a commission and remits the residual to the intellectual property owners. During the first six months of fiscal year 2004 and 2003, we made royalty payments of $4,743 and $4,349, respectively, to this company and received royalty payments of $4,965 and $5,974, respectively, from this company. We also recorded our equity in the income of the company of $483 and $500 in the first six months of fiscal years 2004 and 2003, respectively. Our equity investment in this limited liability company was $0 at January 2, 2004.

The second entity, Scientific-Atlanta of Shanghai, Ltd. (SASL), is a partially-owned subsidiary of Scientific-Atlanta that manufactures certain transmission products. During the first six months of fiscal years 2004 and 2003, we purchased $2,418 and $812, respectively, of transmission products from this subsidiary. We also sold $1,052 and $527 of components for transmission products to this company during the first six months of fiscal years 2004 and 2003, respectively. In addition, we recorded income of $241 in the first six months of fiscal year 2004 and losses of $179 in the first six months of fiscal year 2003 from our equity in the net earnings and losses of this company. Our equity investment in SASL was $2,232 at January 2, 2004.

Based on our initial assessment of the impact of Interpretation No. 46, we believe that our equity investment in each of these entities constitutes our maximum exposure to loss at January 2, 2004 from our involvement with the entity.

EITF No. 00-21 provides guidance on determining units of accounting in a revenue arrangement with multiple deliverables and the allocation of the consideration received from the arrangement. EITF No. 00-21, which was effective for revenue arrangements entered into in the first annual or interim period after June 15, 2003, was adopted123R in the first quarter of fiscal year 2004. The2006 using a modified version of prospective application.

As permitted by SFAS No. 123, we currently account for share-based payments to employees using APB Opinion No. 25’s intrinsic value method and, as such, recognize no compensation cost for employee stock options. Accordingly, the adoption of EITFSFAS No. 00-21 did not123R’s fair value method could have a significant impact on the recognitionour result of revenue or resultoperations. The impact of adoption of SFAS No. 123R cannot be predicted at this time because it will depend on levels of share-based payments granted in the deferralfuture. However, had we adopted SFAS No. 123R in prior periods, the impact of that standard would have approximated the impact of SFAS No. 123 as described in the disclosure of pro forma net income and earnings per share in Note C to our consolidated financial statements. SFAS No. 123R also requires the benefits of tax deductions in excess of recognized compensation cost to be reported as a significantfinancing cash flow, rather than as an operating cash flow as required under current literature. This requirement will reduce net operating cash flows and increase net financing cash flows in periods after adoption. While we cannot estimate what those amounts will be in the future (because they depend on, among other things, when employees exercise stock options), the amount of revenueoperating cash flows recognized in prior periods for such excess tax deductions were $1,241 and $1,670 for the three and six months ended December 31, 2004, respectively, and $557 and $11,078 for the three and six months ended January 2, 2004, respectively.

The FASB also recently issued FSP No. FAS 109-1, “Application of FASB Statement No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes, to the Tax Deduction on Qualified Production Activities Provided by the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004,” and FSP No. FAS 109-2, “Accounting and Disclosure Guidance for the Foreign Earnings Repatriation Provision within the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004” (the Act). Under the guidance in FSP No. FAS 109-1, the deduction will be treated as a “special deduction” as described in SFAS No. 109. As such, the special deduction has no effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities existing at the enactment date. Rather, the impact of this deduction will be reported in the firstperiod in which the deduction is claimed on our income tax return. FSP No. FAS 109-2 allows enterprises time beyond the financial reporting period of the enactment of the Act to evaluate the effects of the Act on its plan for reinvestment or second quartersrepatriation of fiscal year 2004.

10foreign earnings for purposes of 33


In EITF Issueapplying SFAS No. 03-5, the EITF concluded that, in an arrangement that includes software that is more than incidental109 due to the products or services aslack of clarification of certain provisions within the Act and the timing of the enactment. As such, we are not yet in a whole,position to decide on whether, and to what extent, we might repatriate foreign earnings that have not yet been remitted to the software and software-related elements are includedU.S. Based on our analysis to date, however, it is reasonably possible that we may repatriate some amount ranging from $0 to $60,000, with the respective tax benefit ranging from $0 to $3,000. We expect to be in the scope of Statement of Position (SOP) 97-2, “Software Revenue Recognition.” EITF Issue No. 03-5, which was adopted in the second quarter of fiscal year 2004, was effective for arrangements entered into in the first annual or interim reporting period after August 13, 2003. The adoption of EITF Issue No. 03-5 did not have a significant impact on the recognition of revenue or result in the deferral of a significant amount of revenue in the second quarter of fiscal year 2004.position to finalize our assessment by December 31, 2005.

 

11 of 3336


MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

 

OVERVIEW

 

Sales for the three months ended January 2,December 31, 2004 were $416.6$441.7 million, an increase of 186 percent fromover the comparable quarterperiod of the prior year. The year-over-year increase was driven by higher sales volume of Explorer® digital set-tops, including our Explorer 8000 set-top,certain models which provide digital video recording and / or high-definition functionality. Gross margins of 37.837.1 percent improved 6.2were 0.7 percentage points overlower than the prior yearyear. Operating expenses increased $1.2 million due primarily to the higher levelincremental hiring of sales volume, material cost reductionsengineers related to new set-top designs. The increase in research and improved efficienciesdevelopment expense was offset in manufacturing. The settlement with German cable operator ish discussed below negatively impacted gross marginspart by approximately $6.5 million, or 2.3 percentage points. Operating expenses declined slightly due primarily to lower restructuring costs in the second quarter of fiscal year 20042005 as compared to the prior year. Net earnings for the three months ended January 2,December 31, 2004 of $51.1$58.7 million were $36.0$7.6 million higher than the prior year due todriven primarily by the higher sales volume and improved gross marginslower effective tax rate in the second quarter of fiscal year 20042005 as compared to the prior year.

 

During the second quarter, we engaged in substantive discussions with Gemstar – TV Guide International, Inc. (Gemstar) regarding a possible settlement and cross-licensing agreement. No agreement has been reached at this time. If circumstances were to change during the third quarter of fiscal year 2005, we may include, as a result of any settlement, an additional expense or charge in our results of operations for the third quarter of fiscal year 2005. At this time, we can not assess the probability of a settlement and there can be no assurance as to the outcome of these settlement agreements.

FINANCIAL CONDITION AND LIQUIDITY

 

WeScientific-Atlanta had stockholders’ equity of $1.6$1.9 billion and cash on hand was $450.5$339.6 million at January 2, 2004. Cash increased $90.7 million during the first six months of fiscal yearDecember 31, 2004. Cash provided by operating activities for the six months ended January 2,December 31, 2004 of $118.2$130.1 million included net earnings of $93.8$114.6 million and increases indepreciation and amortization of $40.4 million. During the six months ended December 31, 2004, we received $22.7 million of income taxes payable of $23.7 milliontax refunds and in accounts payable and accrued liabilities of $13.9 million.related interest from a federal income tax settlement for certain fiscal years prior to 2003. These receipts were offset partially by increases in accounts receivable of $47.2$9.2 million and gainsa reduction in accrued liabilities of $18.8 million. The increase in accounts receivable relates primarily to the timing of payments from customers in the first six months of fiscal year 2005 as compared to July 2, 2004. Accrued expenses decreased primarily due to the payment of fiscal year 2004 incentives on the sale of marketable securities and investments in privately-held companies of $9.2 million.performance-based plans.

 

During the six months ended December 31, 2004, we increased our short-term investments by $58.6$120.6 million and acquired machineryproperty, plant and equipment for $11.6$58.1 million, received proceedsincluding a cash payment of $13.6$36.0 million fromfor the salepurchase of marketable securities and made a $9.0 million payment to settle purchase price adjustments related to the sale of the satellite networks businesses to ViaSat.buildings we had previously leased at our office site in Lawrenceville, Georgia. We also received $41.4 million from the issuancepurchased 1,836,600 shares of our common stock under our employee stock option and other benefit plans.at an aggregate cost of $50.7 million pursuant to a program announced in February 2003 to buy back up to 10,000,000 shares.

 

The current ratio of Scientific-Atlanta was 5.2:6.7:1 at January 2,December 31, 2004, up from 4.8:5.6:1 at June 27, 2003.July 2, 2004. At January 2,December 31, 2004, we had debt of $10.3$9.2 million, primarily mortgages on facilities we assumed in connection with the acquisition of BarcoNet NV (BarcoNet) during fiscal year 2002.

We believe that funds generated from operations, and existing cash balances and our available senior credit facility will be sufficient to support operations and fund capital expenditures. We do not anticipate borrowing on our available senior credit facility to support operations or fund capital expenditures.operations.

 

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Sales for the quarter ended December 31, 2004 were $441.7 million, up 6 percent or $25.1 million over the prior year. International sales for the second quarter of fiscal year 2005 were $116.1 million, up 27 percent over the prior year. Year-over-year international sales were up in all regions except the Asia / Pacific region.

 

Sales of subscriber products for the quarter ended January 2,December 31, 2004, increased 2911 percent from the prior year’s second quarter to $296.2$327.6 million. In the second quarter of fiscal year 2004,2005, we sold 958911 thousand Explorer digital set-tops as compared to 804958 thousand in the prior year. The 958 thousand digital set-tops sold included 260 thousand Explorer 8000 set-tops, an increase from 31 thousand sold the second quarter of the prior year. During the second quarter of fiscal year 2004,2005, we also sold 226460 thousand WebSTAR cable modems, up from 189226 thousand in the prior year. Sales of transmission products during the second quarter of fiscal year 2005 totaled $114.1 million, a decline of 5 percent from the prior year.

 

During the first quarter of fiscal year 2003, we shipped Explorer set-tops and associated headend equipment to Cablevision Systems Corporation (Cablevision), for which we deferred the recognition of approximately $18 million of sales, pending the execution of an agreement supplementing the original binding agreement. During the second quarter of last year, we executed a supplemental agreement with Cablevision which enabled us to recognize $16 million of the sales that had been previously deferred.

Also during the second quarter of the prior year, we reached an agreement with German cable operator ish related to work orders which had been suspended or cancelled during the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2002 and our exposure in accounts receivable and inventory related to ish. We received a cash payment of $22.0 million, notes denominated at $19.0 million which we sold for $11.5 million, and preferred equity in a newly formed entity, Kabelnetz. In connection with this transaction, we recorded sales of $4.4 million and charged $10.9 million to cost of sales for in-process inventory retained by ish. We also removed from backlog approximately $19 million of orders from ish. During the second quarter of fiscal yearended December 31, 2004, we sold 449 thousand set-tops with digital video recording capability (DVRs), including 256 thousand units of our standard-definition model and 193 thousand units of our high-definition DVR model. We also sold 111 thousand high-definition set-tops without DVR capability. Together with the shares in Kabelnetz and recognized a gain of $6.8 million from the transaction.high-definition DVRs

 

12 of 3336


Sales of transmission products duringmentioned previously, we sold 304 thousand high-definition set-tops in the quarter, ended January 2, 2004 totaled $120.3 million, approximately the same as in the comparable period of the prior year. Increased sales to customers in North America and Latin America were partially offset by a decline in sales to customers in Europe.

Because there is considerable cross-over between satellite products and certain transmission products as a result of the BarcoNet acquisition, and because bookings and sales of our satellite products have been consistently less than five percent of company totals, we have included satellite products together with transmission products.

International sales in the second quarter of fiscal year 2004 were $91.2 million, an increase of 21more than 200 percent fromcompared to the secondsame quarter of last year. The increase in international sales was due primarily to an increase in shipments to customers in Canada partially offset by a decline in shipments to customers in the Asia Pacific region.

 

Sales for the six months ended January 2,December 31, 2004 were $812.2$894.3 million, up 2210 percent from $663.6$812.2 million in the first six months of the prior year. Sales of subscriber products were $572.1$660.7 million, an increase of 3516 percent from the prior year. We sold approximately 1.9 million digital set-tops during the six months ended January 2,December 31, 2004, which was relatively flat compared to approximately 1.3 million during the first six months of the prior fiscal year. Included inOf the approximately 1.9 million digital set-tops shipped weresold, more than 437845 thousand Explorer 8000of the digital set-tops included digital video recording capability. This is an increase from approximately 123438 thousand Explorer 8000 digital set-tops shipped during the six months ended December 27, 2002.of last year. Sales of transmission products were $240.1$233.7 million, approximately the same as ina decline of 3 percent compared to the first six months of last year. International sales for the first six months of fiscal year 2005 totaled $172.2$214.2 million, an increase of 2up 24 percent fromcompared to the first six months last year. The increase from the prior year was due primarily to an increase in shipments to customers in both Canada andall regions except the Asia / Pacific region.

Gross margin in the second quarter of fiscal year 2005 was 37.1 percent of sales, a decline of 0.7 percentage points from the second quarter of last year. Lower selling prices in the quarter ended December 31, 2004 as compared to last year were partially offset by amaterial and conversion cost reductions. The combined average selling price of our digital set-tops increased approximately 13 percent in the second quarter of fiscal year 2005 compared to the second quarter of 2004. The increase in the combined average selling price of digital set-tops is attributable to the increase in the shipments of Explorer 8000 set-tops to more than 448 thousand units, up more than 72 percent from 260 thousand units sold in the second quarter of last year. Explorer 8000 digital set-tops, which have digital video recording capability, currently have an average selling price higher than other set-tops, and gross margins lower than the company average. Although the price of individual models of digital set-tops may decline in salesthe future, the average selling price of digital set-tops will vary based on the mix of models sold during the period. We continue to customers in Europefocus on cost reductions through product design, procurement and Latin America.manufacturing.

 

Gross margins were 37.8 percent of sales for the three months ended January 2, 2004, 6.2 percentage points higher than the comparable quarter of the prior year. During the second quarter of last year, the ish settlement discussed above negatively impacted gross margins by approximately $6.5 million, or 2.3 percentage points. The increase in gross margin percent relative to last year was primarily the result of the increase in sales volume, material cost reductions achieved through the re-design of products, increased effectiveness of procurement, and improved efficiencies in manufacturing. These improvements more than offset the negative impact of declines in the average selling price of products and the shift to a higher mix of Explorer 8000 digital set-top shipments, which have a gross margin lower than the company average. In addition, gross margins on transmission products in the three months ended January 2, 2004 improved over the prior year due primarily to favorable product mix, reductions in material costs and the consolidation of certain BarcoNet product lines into our Juarez, Mexico factory.

Gross margins were 37.536.8 percent of sales for the six months ended January 2, 2004, 3.7of fiscal year 2005, 0.7 percentage points higherlower than the prior year. The leverage associated with a 22 percent increasedecline from last year was related primarily to lower selling prices of digital set-tops across most set-top models in sales, coupled with the continued benefits of cost reductions through product redesign, the increased effectiveness of procurement, and improved manufacturing efficiencies, more than offsetaddition to the negative impact of shipping a greater number of Explorer 8000 digital set-tops that currently have a lower gross margin than the company average. In addition,Lower material and conversion costs coupled with the gross marginsleverage of transmission products improved during the first six months of this year compared to the prior year. This improvement was related primarily to ana 10 percent increase in the shipments of higher margin BarcoNet and traditional access products fromsales compared to the first six months of last year combined with material costs savings gained throughpartially offset the efficienciesnegative impact of procurementthe lower selling prices and other costs savings obtained fromhigher mix of Explorer 8000 digital set-top shipments relative to the various restructuring actions taken over thefirst six months of last eighteen months.year.

 

SalesResearch and administrativedevelopment expenses of $48.0 million and $96.0 million infor the three and six months ended January 2,December 31, 2004 were both$37.9 million and $76.2 million, respectively, up approximately the same as insix percent over the comparable periods of the prior year due to higher incentive accrualsyear. The primary driver of the year-to-year increases was incremental hiring related to our improved profitability which were offset by lower professional fees and reductions in amortization expense of intangible assets.

Research and development expenses for the quarter ended January 2, 2004 were $36.0 million, down slightly from the prior year. Research and development expenses for the six months ended January 2, 2004 were $71.3 million, down $5.3 million or 7 percent from the prior year. The year-over-year decline was due to higher capitalization of software development costs in the first six months of fiscal year 2004 as compared to the prior year and the benefits realized from previously announced restructurings. During the first six months of fiscal year 2004, we capitalized $9.8 million of software development costs, compared to $2.2 million in the comparable period of the prior year. The year-over- year increase in the capitalization of software development costs was driven primarily by increased development costs related to the Explorer 8300 Multi-Room DVR (digital video recorder) product, product enhancements for customers and products for expansion into new markets, such as a version of the Explorer interactive digital set-top for the Japanese market.designs. Research and development efforts continue to focus on advanced models of digital set-tops, network software enhancements and upgrades, data products, satellite products and transmission products.

 

13Sales and administrative expenses of 33

$47.9 million and $96.7 million in the three and six months ended December 31, 2004, respectively, were flat compared to the comparable periods of the prior year.


In August 2002, we announced a restructuring of our worldwide operations to align our costs with reduced sales levels. The restructuring included a reduction of our workforce by 400 positions, or approximately 6 percent of our total workforce, and was substantially completed by December 27, 2002. The positions eliminated were from manufacturing, engineering, marketing, sales, service and administrative functions. The restructuring also included the consolidation of certain office and manufacturing facilities. In addition, during the third quarter of fiscal year 2003, we reduced our workforce by approximately 120 positions, primarily in sales and other functions within the transmission sector, and reduced our workforce by an additional 30 positions in the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2003. WeDuring the three and six months ended January 2, 2004, we recorded restructuring charges of $0.6 million and $1.3 million, respectively, primarily for severance, during the quarter and six months ended January 2, 2004, respectively.severance. We do not anticipate recording additionalsignificant restructuring charges induring fiscal year 2004 that will total approximately $0.3 million.2005.

 

Interest income of $4.2$6.7 million and $8.0$12.5 million in the three and six months ended January 2,December 31, 2004, declined $1.6 million and $3.6 million, respectively, fromincreased over the comparable periods of the prior year. These declines wereyear due primarily to lowerhigher average interest ratescash and short-term investment balances and higher yields in these periods of fiscal year 20042005 as compared to the prior year.

Other expense of $1.0 million and $0.9 million for the three and six months ended December 31, 2004, respectively, included losses on short-term investments and from the other-than-temporary decline in the fair value of an investment in a privately-held company, gains from the increase in the cash surrender value of life insurance, partnership income, foreign exchange losses, and various other items, none of which was individually significant.

 

Other income of $2.2 million for the three months ended January 2, 2004 included a gain of $6.8 million from the sale of shares of Kabelnetz, which had been received as part of the termination settlement with German cable operator ish in the

13 of 36


second quarter of fiscal year 2003, foreign exchange gains, gains from the increase in the cash surrender value of life insurance and gains from various other items, none of which was individually significant. We also recorded a loss of $6.1 million from the settlement of purchase price adjustments, which included a cash payment of $9.0 million, related to the sale of the satellite networks business to ViaSat. In connection with this transaction, we utilizedViaSat, of which $2.9 million of liabilities which had been previously established related to indemnifications to ViaSat, primarily for warranty.reserved for.

 

In addition to the gain from the sale of shares of Kabelnetz and the loss from the settlement of purchase price adjustments with ViaSat described above, other income of $1.3 million for the six months ended January 2, 2004 included a gain of $1.9 million from the sale of a marketable security, charges of $1.8 million from other-than-temporary declines in the value of investments in privately-held companies, foreign exchange losses and losses from various other items, none of which was individually significant.

 

Other expense of $6.6Earnings before income taxes were $83.5 million for the quarter ended December 27, 2002 included $6.5and $168.0 million of losses from other-than-temporary declines in the market value of marketable securitiesthree and investments in privately-held companies. Other expense of $12.1 million for the six months ended December 27, 2002 included losses31, 2004, respectively, up over the comparable periods of $11.0 million from other-than-temporary declinesthe prior year. The year-over-year improvements were due to higher sales volume in these periods of fiscal year 2005 as compared to the market value of marketable securities and investments in privately-held companies and $1.9 million from the decline in the cash surrender value of life insurance. These losses were partially offset by a net gain of $2.5 million from the settlement of a collar on a warrant to purchase common stock of a public company and the related warrant. There were no other significant items in other (income) expense for the three or six months ended December 27, 2002.prior year.

 

The effective tax rate for the three and six months ended January 2,December 31, 2004 was 35.230 percent of pre-tax earnings, updown from approximately 34.035 percent in the prior year, due primarily to various discrete items in the quarter, the most significant of which was the reversal of valuation allowances on certain deferred tax assets. During the quarter ended December 31, 2004, we determined that valuation allowances on deferred tax assets related to net operating loss carryforwards generated by certain operations in Europe were no longer needed due to the recent and projected profitability of these operations. In addition, the rate was favorably impacted by the legislative, retroactive reinstatement, on October 4, 2004, of the research tax credit to June 30, 2004.

The effective tax rate for the six months ended December 31, 2004 was 32 percent of pre-tax earnings, down from 35 percent in the prior year. In addition to the items discussed above, the effective rate for the six months ended December 31, 2004 was also favorably impacted by revisions to the estimates of foreign net operating loss carryforwards and additional refunds of income taxes and related interest from the IRS. We believe that our effective tax rate will be approximately 33 percent of pre-tax earnings for fiscal year 2005.

U.S. income taxes, net of applicable credits, have been provided on the undistributed earnings of foreign subsidiaries, except in those instances where the earnings are expected to be indefinitely reinvested. Scientific-Atlanta currently intends to indefinitely reinvest approximately $37.0 million of undistributed earnings of a foreign subsidiary; however, this amount may be adjusted based on changes in business, economic or other conditions. At December 31, 2004, approximately $18.0 million of such undistributed earnings had been indefinitely reinvested.

On October 22, 2004, the President signed the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004 (the “Act”). The Act creates a temporary incentive for U.S. corporations to repatriate accumulated income earned abroad by providing an 85 percent dividend received deduction for certain dividends from controlled foreign corporations. The deduction is subject to a number of limitations and, as of today, uncertainty remains as to how to interpret numerous provisions in the Act. As such, we are not yet in a position to decide on whether, and to what extent, we might repatriate foreign earnings that have not yet been remitted to the U.S. Based on our analysis to date, however, it is reasonably possible that we may repatriate some amount ranging from $0 to $60 million, with the respective tax benefit ranging from $0 to $3 million. We expect to be in a position to finalize our assessment by December 31, 2005.

The Act also creates a deduction for income from qualified domestic production activities which will be phased in from 2005 through 2010, effective for our fiscal years 2006 through 2011. In return, the Act also provides for a two-year phase-out of the existing extra-territorial income exclusion (ETI) for foreign sales that was viewed to be inconsistent with international trade protocols by the European Union. We expect the phase out of ETI to result in an immaterial increase in the effective tax rate was duefor fiscal years 2005, 2006 and 2007. The new deduction for domestic production activities is subject to certain limitations and interpretations and, as such, we are not yet in a position to determine the diminishedpotential impact on the effective tax rate of research and development credits on higher levels of pretax earnings and an increase in state income taxes.future years.

 

Under the guidance in FSP No. FAS 109-1, “Application of FASB Statement No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes, to the Tax Deduction on Qualified Production Activities Provided by the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004,” the deduction will be treated as a “special deduction” as described in SFAS No. 109. As such, the special deduction has no effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities existing at the enactment date. Rather, the impact of this deduction will be reported in the period in which the deduction is claimed on our income tax return.

14 of 36


Critical Accounting Policies

 

Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal year 20032004 includes a summary of the significant accounting policies or methods used in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements. Some of those significant accounting policies or methods require us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported by us. We believe the following items require the most significant judgments and often involve complex estimates.

 

General

 

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. We base our estimates and judgments on historical experience and various other factors we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions. The most significant estimates and assumptions relate to revenue recognition, the adequacy of receivable, inventory and tax reserves, deferred tax allowances, asset impairments and accrued liabilities and other liabilities, principally relating to warranty provisions and the pension benefit liability.

 

14 of 33


Revenue Recognition

 

Our principal sources of revenues are from sales of digital interactive subscriber systems, broadband transmission networks and content distribution networks. We recognize revenue when (1) there is persuasive evidence of an agreement with the customer, (2) product is shipped and title has passed, (3) the amount due from the customer is fixed and determinable, (4) collectibility is reasonably assured, and (5) we have no significant future performance obligation. At the time of the transaction, we assess whether the amount due from the customer is fixed and determinable and collection of the resulting receivable is reasonably assured. We assess whether the amount due from the customer is fixed and determinable based on the terms of the agreement with the customer, including, but not limited to, the payment terms associated with the transaction. We assess collection based on a number of factors, including past transaction history with the customer and credit-worthiness of the customer. If we determine that collection of an amount due is not reasonably assured, we defer recognition of revenue until collection becomes reasonably assured.

 

The standard terms and conditions under which we ship allow a customer the right to return product for refund only if the product does not conform to product specifications; the non-conforming product is identified by the customer; and the customer rejects the non-conforming product and notifies us within ten days of receipt. If an agreement contains a non-standard right of return, we defer recognizing revenue until the conditions of the agreement are met. From time to time, our agreements include acceptance clauses. If an agreement includes an acceptance clause, revenue is recorded at the timedeferred until acceptance is deemed to have occurred.

 

Certain agreements also include multiple deliverables or elements for products and/or services. We recognize revenue from these agreements based on the relative fair value of the products and services. The determination of the fair value of the elements, which is based on a variety of factors, including the amount we charge other customers for the products or services, price lists or other relevant information, requires judgment by management. If an undelivered element is essential to the functionality of the delivered element or required under the terms of the contract to be delivered concurrently, we defer the revenue on the delivered element until that undelivered element is delivered.

 

We adopted EITF No. 00-21, “Accounting for Revenue Arrangements with Multiple Deliverables”Deliverables,” for agreements entered into in the first quarter of fiscal year 2004. Agreements with multiple deliverables are reviewed and the deliverables are separated into units of accounting under the provisions of EITF No. 00-21. The total consideration received is allocated over the relative fair value of the units of accounting. As indicated above, the determination of fair value requires judgment by management. Revenue is recognized as the elements are delivered, assuming all the other conditions for recognition of revenue discussed in the preceding paragraphs have been met.

 

For certain products where software is more than an incidental component of the hardware, we recognize software license revenue under SOP No. 97-2, “Software Revenue Recognition”,Recognition,” as amended by SOP No. 98-9, “Software Revenue Recognition, with Respect to Certain Transactions”.Transactions.” Software revenue recognition rules are very complex. Although we follow very specific and detailed guidelines in measuring revenue, the application of those guidelines requires judgment, including whether the software is more than an incidental component of the hardware and whether a software arrangement includes multiple elements, and if so, whether vendor-specific objective evidence of fair value exists for any undelivered elements.

 

Allowance for Doubtful Accounts15 of 36

Management judgments and estimates are made in connection with establishing the allowance for doubtful accounts. Specifically, we analyze the aging of accounts receivable balances, historical bad debts, customer concentrations, customer credit-worthiness, current economic trends and changes in our customer payment terms. Significant changes in customer concentration or payment terms, deterioration of customer credit-worthiness, as in the case of the bankruptcy of Adelphia, or weakening in economic trends could have a significant impact on the collectibility of receivables and our operating results. Generally, we do not require collateral or other security to support accounts receivable.


Inventory Reserves

 

We regularly review inventory quantities on hand and record a provision for excess and obsolete inventory based primarily on our estimated forecast of product demand and production requirements for the next twelve months. In addition, our industry is characterized by rapid technological change, frequent introductions of new product developmentproducts and rapid product obsolescence that could result in an increase in the amount of obsolete inventory on hand. Recently, the rate at which we introduce new products has accelerated, which also may result in an increase in the amount of obsolete inventory on hand. Any significant, unanticipated changes in demand or technological developments could have a significant impact on the value of our inventory and operating results.

 

15 of 33


Non-Current Marketable SecuritiesIncome Taxes

 

Non-current marketable securities consistWe recognize deferred tax assets and liabilities based on the differences between the financial statement carrying amounts and the tax basis of investmentsassets and liabilities. We regularly review our deferred tax assets for recoverability and establish a valuation allowance based on historical taxable income, projected future taxable income, the expected timing of the reversals of existing temporary differences and the implementation of tax planning strategies. If we are unable to generate sufficient future taxable income in common stock, primarily technology companies, and warrants of publicly traded companies and are stated at market value. We have market risks associated with the volatilitycertain tax jurisdictions, or if there is a material change in the value ofactual effective tax rates or time period within which the underlying temporary differences become taxable or deductible, we could be required to increase the valuation allowance against our non-current marketable securities. All investmentsdeferred tax assets, resulting in common stockan increase in the effective tax rate and an adverse impact on operating results.

Management judgments and estimates are classified as “available for sale” under the provisions of SFAS No. 115,made in connection with establishing and thus, changesadjusting valuation allowances on deferred tax assets, estimated tax payments and tax reserves. Changes in these estimates could have a significant impact on our operating results.

Goodwill Impairment

We perform annual goodwill impairment tests to identify potential impairment by comparing the fair value of these securities are not included in our Consolidated Statementsthe reporting unit with its net book value, including goodwill. We test for impairment at the operating segment level (subscriber and transmission). Estimates of Earnings until realized. Unrealized holding gains and losses are included, net of taxes, in accumulated other comprehensive income. Realized gains and losses and declines in value judged to be other-than-temporary are included in Other (income) expense. We periodically evaluate the carrying value of our investments in common stock to determine if declines in fair value are other-than-temporary. This evaluation requires judgmentdetermined using discounted cash flows and market comparisons. We perform internal valuation analyses and consider other market information that is publicly available. These analyses use significant estimates and assumptions, including projected future cash flows (including timing), discount rates reflecting the risk inherent in future cash flows, determination of appropriate comparables and the determination of whether a premium or discount should be applied to comparables. These estimates and assumptions are reviewed and updated annually based on several factors including the market price of the security generally over the preceding six months, analysts’ reportsactual results and future projections. Changes in these estimates and assumptions may result in a determination that goodwill is impaired and could have a significant impact on the security, the performance of the stock market index of the security and the overall economic environment. Unrealized gains and losses on warrants are included in Other (income) expense.our operating results.

 

Investments in Privately-Held CompaniesSegments

 

InvestmentsWe operate in privately-held companies consist primarilyone reportable segment, the Broadband segment, which consists of securitiesour subscriber and transmission operating segments. We have combined these operating segments into a single reportable segment under the aggregation criteria of emerging technology companiesSFAS No. 131, “Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information.” Operating segments may be aggregated into a single operating segment if the segments have similar economic characteristics, and if the segments are similar in 1) the nature of products and services; 2) the nature of production processes; 3) the type or class of customer for which readily determinable fair values are not available. These investments are carried at costtheir products and are evaluated periodicallyservices; 4) the methods used to determine if declines in fair value are other-than-temporary. This evaluation requires judgmentdistribute their products or provide their services; and is based on several factors including recent private offerings by5) the company, the performancenature of the stock market indexregulatory environment. We believe our subscriber and transmission operating segments meet all of similar publicly traded securitiesthese criteria and that aggregation is consistent with the overall economic environment. Declines in value judged to be other-than-temporary are included in Other (income) expense. Investments in privately-held companiesobjective and basic principles of $7.8 million and $8.6 million were included in Other assets in the Consolidated Statements of Financial Position at January 2, 2004 and June 27, 2003, respectively.SFAS No. 131.

 

Warranty Costs

 

We offer warranties of various lengths to our customers depending on the specific product and the terms of the agreements with the customer. Our standard warranties require us to repair or replace defective product returned to us during the warranty period at no cost to the customer. We record an estimate for warranty-related costs based on our actual historical and/or projected failure rates and repair costs at the time of sale. We repair products in our manufacturing facilities and also outsource warranty repairs. Historical and/or projected failure rates and repair costs are reviewed and the estimated warranty liability is adjusted, if required, quarterly. Expenses related to unusual product warranty problems and product defects are recorded in the period the problem is identified. A significant increase in product failure rates, in the costs to repair our products or in the amount of warranty repairs outsourced could have a significant impact on our operating results. For certain purchased products, such as cable modems and hard drives, included in our set-tops, we provide the same warranty coverage to our customers as the supplier of the products provides to us. Failure of the supplier to honor its warranty commitment to us could also have a significant impact on our operating results. The warranty liability was $34.0$41.6 million and $36.0$36.2 million at JanuaryDecember 31, 2004 and July 2, 2004, and June 27, 2003, respectively.

 

16 of 36


Pension Assumptions

 

The pension benefit liability and the related effects on our operating results are calculated using actuarial models. We use March 31 as a measurement date for all actuarial calculations of asset and liability values and significant actuarial assumptions. Two critical assumptions, discount rate and expected return on assets, are important elements of plan expense and / and/or liability measurement. We evaluatere-evaluate these assumptions annually. Other assumptions involve demographic factors such as retirement, mortality, rate of compensation increase and turnover. These assumptions are also evaluatedre-evaluated annually and are updated to reflect our experience. The discount rate is required to represent the market rate for high-quality fixed income investments. We reduced our discount rate from 7.50 percent at June 28, 2002 to 6.50 percent at June 27, 2003 to reflect market interest conditions. To determine the expected long-term rate of return on pension plan assets, we consider the historical and expected returns on the plan assets, as well as the current and expected allocation of the plan assets. We assumed that long-term returns on

At March 31, 2004, we reduced the discount rate used to calculate the pension benefit liability and expense from 6.50 percent to 6.00 to reflect the lower market interest conditions. This change in our pension plan assets would be 8.00 percent in fiscal year 2004 and 10.00 percent in fiscal year 2003. The changes in these assumptions will increaseincreased our pension expense by approximately $1.9$0.3 million in fiscal year 2004.2005 over the preceding year. The expected long-term rate of return on pension assets was 8.00 percent, unchanged from the preceding year.

 

Actual results in any given year will often differ from actuarial assumptions because of economic and other factors. The actual results could have a significant impact on our operating results.

 

Goodwill ImpairmentAllowance for Doubtful Accounts

 

We perform an annual goodwill impairment test to identify potential impairment by comparingManagement judgments and estimates are made in connection with establishing the fair valueallowance for doubtful accounts. Specifically, we analyze the aging of accounts receivable balances, historical bad debts, customer concentrations, customer credit-worthiness, current economic trends and changes in our customer payment terms. Significant changes in customer concentration or payment terms, deterioration of customer credit-worthiness, as in the case of the reporting unit with its net book value, including goodwill. Estimatesbankruptcy of fair value are determined using discounted cash flows and market comparisons. We perform internal valuation analyses and consider other market information that is publicly available. These analyses use significant estimates and assumptions, including projected future cash flows (including timing), discount rates reflecting the risk inherentAdelphia, or weakening in future cash flows, determination of appropriate comparables and the determination of whether a

16 of 33


premium or discount should be applied to comparables. These estimates and assumptions are reviewed and updated annually based on actual results and future projections. Changes in these estimates and assumptions may result in a determination that goodwill is impaired andeconomic trends could have a significant impact on the collectibility of receivables and our operating results. Generally, we do not require collateral or other security to support accounts receivable.

 

Non-Current Marketable Securities

Non-current marketable securities consist of investments in common stock, primarily stock of technology companies, and warrants of publicly traded companies and are stated at market value. We have market risks associated with the volatility in the value of our non-current marketable securities. All investments in common stock are classified as “available-for-sale” under the provisions of SFAS No. 115, and thus, changes in the fair value of these securities are not included in our Consolidated Statements of Earnings until realized. Unrealized holding gains and losses are included, net of taxes, in Accumulated other comprehensive income. Realized gains and losses and declines in value judged to be other-than-temporary are included in Other (income) expense. We periodically evaluate the carrying value of our investments in common stock to determine if declines in fair value are other-than-temporary. This evaluation requires judgment and is based on several factors, including the market price of the security generally over the preceding six months, analysts’ reports on the security, the performance of the stock market index of the security and the overall economic environment. Unrealized gains and losses on warrants are included in Other (income) expense.

Investments in Privately-Held Companies

Investments in privately-held companies consist primarily of securities of emerging technology companies for which readily determinable fair values are not available. These investments are carried at cost and are evaluated periodically to determine if declines in fair value are other-than-temporary. This evaluation requires judgment and is based on several factors, including recent private offerings by the company, the performance of the stock market index of similar publicly traded securities and the overall economic environment. Declines in value judged to be other-than-temporary are included in Other (income) expense. Investments in privately-held companies of $5.8 million and $6.5 million were included in Other assets in the Consolidated Statements of Financial Position at December 31, 2004 and July 2, 2004, respectively.

Stock-Based Compensation

 

We have adopted the disclosure requirements of SFAS No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation”Compensation,” but elected to continue to account for stock-based compensation using the intrinsic method prescribed in APB Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees”Employees,” and related interpretations. Accordingly, compensation cost for stock options is measured as the excess, if any, of the quoted market price of our stock at the date of grant over the amount an employee must pay to acquire the stock.

 

17 of 36


Pro forma stock-based compensation expense, net of tax, was $20.8$15.5 million and $35.1$20.8 million for the six months ended December 31, 2004 and January 2, 2004, and December 27, 2002, respectively. These amounts are significant and fluctuate significantly due to the relatively high and increasing volatility of our stock price. In addition, the amount of stock-compensation expense is impacted by our amortization of the compensation expense over a relatively short vesting period of three years and an increase in the number of options granted as we have shifted more ofgranted. We periodically review all assumptions used in our compensation to options from restricted stock.stock option pricing model.

 

New Accounting Pronouncements

 

TheDuring fiscal year 2004, the FASB recently issued FASB Staff Position (FSP)FSP No. 106-1106-2, “Accounting and Disclosure Requirements Related to the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement and Modernization Act of 2003”, SFAS No. 132 (revised 2003) “Employers’ Disclosures about Pensions and Other Postretirement Benefits”, Interpretation No. 46 “Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities” and EITF No. 00-21 “Accounting for Revenue Arrangements with Multiple Deliverables” and ratified the consensus reached by the EITF on Issue 03-5, “Applicability of AICPA Statement 97-2, Software Revenue Recognition, to Non-Software Deliverables in an Arrangement Containing More-Than-Incidental Software.2003.

FSP No. 106-1106-2 provides guidance related to the accounting for and disclosure of, including the deferral of recognition of, a federal subsidy to sponsors of retiree health care benefit plans that provide a benefit that is at least actuarially equivalent to Medicare Part D provided under the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement and Modernization Act of 2003. FSP No. 106-1106-2 is effective for interim or annual financial statements of fiscal years endingbeginning after December 7, 2003.June 15, 2004. We are currently evaluatinghave elected to defer the recognition of the impact of the ACT and the alternatives provided in FSP No. 106-1. We are unable to predict at this time the impact of the ACT and thenew Medicare provisions under a provision of FSP No. 106-1 on our results106-2 until fiscal year 2006. The effect of operations or financial position.the subsidy is to reduce the plan’s accumulated postretirement benefit obligation by approximately $1.1 million and the net periodic postretirement benefit cost by approximately $0.1 million for fiscal year 2005.

 

In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 132123R, “Share-Based Payment,” which requires additional disclosures about assets, obligations, cash flows and net periodic benefitall companies to measure compensation cost of defined benefit plans and other postretirement benefit plans. The provisions of this Statement arefor all share-based payments, including employee stock options, at fair value effective for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2003 andpublic companies for interim periods beginning after December 15, 2003. We plan to adopt the interim period disclosure provisions of SFAS No. 132 in the third quarter of fiscal year 2004.

Interpretation No. 46 addresses the consolidation by a reporting entity of variable interest entities with certain characteristics. This Interpretation was effective in January 2003 for variable interest entities created after January 31, 2003 and in the first fiscal year or interim periodannual periods beginning after June 15, 2003. The FASB has issued FSPs which have deferred the effective date for applying the provisions of Interpretation2005. Scientific-Atlanta will adopt SFAS No. 46 for interests in certain variable interest entities or potential variable interest entities created before February 1, 2003 until the end of the first interim period ending after March 15, 2004. These FSPs also require certain disclosures about variable interest entities and potential variable interest entities.

We are still assessing the impact of Interpretation No. 46 on arrangements that we have with certain entities and therefore, are deferring the application of its provisions until the third quarter of fiscal year 2004. We have tentatively identified two entities that might require consolidation as variable interest entities under the provisions of Interpretation No. 46. One entity is a limited liability company, in which we have an equity interest, which licenses certain technology, receives a commission and remits the residual to the intellectual property owners. During the first six months of fiscal year 2004 and 2003, we made royalty payments of $4,743 and $4,349, respectively, to this company and received royalty payments of $4,965 and $5,974, respectively, from this company. We also recorded our equity in the income of the company of $483 and $500 in the first six months of fiscal years 2004 and 2003, respectively. Our equity investment in this limited liability company was $0 at January 2, 2004.

The second entity, Scientific-Atlanta of Shanghai, Ltd. (SASL), is a partially-owned subsidiary of Scientific-Atlanta that manufactures certain transmission products. During the first six months of fiscal years 2004 and 2003, we purchased $2,418 and $812, respectively, of transmission products from this subsidiary. We also sold $1,052 and $527 of components for transmission products to this company during the first six months of fiscal years 2004 and 2003, respectively. In addition, we recorded income of $241 in the first six months of fiscal year 2004 and losses of $179 in the first six months of fiscal year 2003 from our equity in the net earnings and losses of this company. Our equity investment in SASL was $2,232 at January 2, 2004. Based on our initial assessment of the impact of Interpretation No. 46, we believe that our equity investment in each of these entities constitutes our maximum exposure to loss at January 2, 2004 from our involvement with the entity.

17 of 33


EITF No. 00-21 provides guidance on determining units of accounting in a revenue arrangement with multiple deliverables and the allocation of the consideration received from the arrangement. EITF No. 00-21, which was effective for revenue arrangements entered into in the first annual or interim period after June 15, 2003, was adopted123R in the first quarter of fiscal year 2004. The2006 using a modified version of prospective application.

As permitted by SFAS No. 123, we currently account for share-based payments to employees using APB Opinion No. 25’s intrinsic value method and, as such, recognize no compensation cost for employee stock options. Accordingly, the adoption of EITFSFAS No. 00-21 did not123R’s fair value method could have a significant impact on the recognitionour result of revenue or resultoperations. The impact of adoption of SFAS No. 123R cannot be predicted at this time because it will depend on levels of share-based payments granted in the deferralfuture. However, had we adopted SFAS No. 123R in prior periods, the impact of that standard would have approximated the impact of SFAS No. 123 as described in the disclosure of pro forma net income and earnings per share in Note C to our consolidated financial statements. SFAS No. 123R also requires the benefits of tax deductions in excess of recognized compensation cost to be reported as a significantfinancing cash flow, rather than as an operating cash flow as required under current literature. This requirement will reduce net operating cash flows and increase net financing cash flows in periods after adoption. While we cannot estimate what those amounts will be in the future (because they depend on, among other things, when employees exercise stock options), the amount of revenueoperating cash flows recognized in prior periods for such excess tax deductions were $1.2 million and $1.7 million for the three and six months ended December 31, 2004, respectively, and $0.6 million and $11.1 million for the three and six months ended January 2, 2004, respectively.

The FASB also recently issued FSP No. FAS 109-1, “Application of FASB Statement No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes, to the Tax Deduction on Qualified Production Activities Provided by the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004,” and FSP No. FAS 109-2, “Accounting and Disclosure Guidance for the Foreign Earnings Repatriation Provision within the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004” (the Act). Under the guidance in FSP No. FAS 109-1, the deduction will be treated as a “special deduction” as described in SFAS No. 109. As such, the special deduction has no effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities existing at the enactment date. Rather, the impact of this deduction will be reported in the firstperiod in which the deduction is claimed on our income tax return. FSP No. FAS 109-2 allows enterprises time beyond the financial reporting period of the enactment of the Act to evaluate the effects of the Act on its plan for reinvestment or second quartersrepatriation of fiscal year 2004.

In EITF Issueforeign earnings for purposes of applying SFAS No. 03-5, the EITF concluded that, in an arrangement that includes software that is more than incidental109 due to the products or services aslack of clarification of certain provisions within the Act and the timing of the enactment. As such, we are not yet in a whole,position to decide on whether, and to what extent, we might repatriate foreign earnings that have not yet been remitted to the software and software-related elements are includedU.S. Based on our analysis to date, however, it is reasonably possible that we may repatriate some amount ranging from $0 to $60 million, with the respective tax benefit ranging from $0 to $3 million. We expect to be in the scope of SOP 97-2, “Software Revenue Recognition.” EITF Issue No. 03-5, which was adopted in the second quarter of fiscal year 2004, was effective for arrangements entered into in the first annual or interim reporting period after August 13, 2003. The adoption of EITF Issue No. 03-5 did not have a significant impact on the recognition of revenue or result in the deferral of a significant amount of revenue in the second quarter of fiscal year 2004.position to finalize our assessment by December 31, 2005.

 

Off-Balance Sheet Financing Arrangements

 

In July 1997, we entered into a long-term operating lease arrangement, which provided $36.0 million to finance the construction of the initial phase of our consolidated office site in Gwinnett County, Georgia, which was completed in the third quarter of fiscal year 1999.Lawrenceville, Georgia. The initial occupancy term iswas seven years and expiresexpired in July 2004. Three five-year extensions of the lease term are available to Scientific-Atlanta. Lease payments were equal to the interest on the $36.0 million financed at a fixed rate of 6.51 percent per annum. A final lease payment of $36.0 million is due at the termination of the lease. We can also purchasepurchased the buildings financed withunder this long-term operating lease arrangement at any time for $36.0 million. We are currently evaluating whether we will extendmillion at the lease term or makeexpiration of the final lease payment of $36.0 million in July 2004.

 

18 of 36


The lease qualified as an operating lease under SFAS No. 13, “Accounting for Leases,” as amended. The lessor iswas a non-bank, general-purpose corporation owned by a financial institution that has engaged in many types of transactions with parties other than Scientific-Atlanta and activities other than lease transactions. Scientific-Atlanta hashad no ownership interest in the lessor or the financial institution.

The lease qualifies as an operating lease under Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 13 “Accounting for Leases”, as amended. We believe thatevaluated the provisions of Interpretation No. 46, “Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities” doEntities,” and concluded that these provisions did not apply to this arrangement. Accordingly, the assets, liabilities, results of operations and cash flows of the lessor have not been included in the consolidated financial statements of Scientific-Atlanta.

 

After the completion of the initial phase of our consolidated office site, all facility expansions were financed with existing cash balances and cash generated from operations.

Scientific-Atlanta has no other off-balance sheet financing arrangements.

 

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

 

Any statements in Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations that are not statements about historical facts are forward-looking statements. Such forward-looking statements are based upon current expectations but involve risks and uncertainties. Investors are referred to the Cautionary Statements contained in Exhibit 99.1 to this Form 10-Q for a description of the various risks and uncertainties that could cause Scientific-Atlanta’s actual results and experience to differ materially from the anticipated results or other expectations expressed in Scientific-Atlanta’s forward- lookingforward-looking statements. Such Exhibit 99.1 is hereby incorporated by reference into Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

 

Scientific-Atlanta, the Scientific-Atlanta logo, and Explorer are registered trademarks of Scientific-Atlanta, Inc. Multi-Room and WebSTAR are trademarksis a trademark of Scientific-Atlanta, Inc. PowerTV is a registered trademark of PowerTV, Inc.

 

1819 of 3336


ITEM 3.QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISKS

ITEM 3.QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISKS

(Amounts in thousands)

 

We are exposed to market risks from changes in foreign exchange rates and have a process to monitor and manage these risks. Scientific-Atlanta enters into foreign exchange forward contracts to hedge certain forecasted transactions, firm commitments and assets denominated in currencies other than the U.S. dollar. These contracts, which qualify as cash flow or fair value hedges, are designated as hedging instruments at inception, are for periods consistent with the exposure being hedged and generally have maturities of one year or less. Contracts are recorded at fair value. Changes in the fair value of derivatives are recorded in other comprehensive income until the underlying transaction affects earnings.earnings for cash flow hedges and in Other (income) expense for fair value hedges.

 

The effectiveness of the hedge is based on a high correlation between the changes in its value and the value of the underlying hedged item. Any ineffectiveness is recorded through earnings.

In the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2002, ish GmbH & Co. KG (ish), a customer in Germany, suspended or canceled a number of orders issued to the Cable upgrade Consortium, of which we were a member and through which we furnished our products and services. A significant portion of these orders was denominated in Euros, and we had forward contracts to sell approximately 33,220 Euros at June 28, 2002, which were designated as cash flow hedges. During fiscal year 2003, we reached a settlement with ish. As a result of the settlement, we no longer needed the forward contracts. We settled the portion of these contracts related to ish and recorded charges of $2,359 for ineffectiveness in Other (income) expense in the first six months of fiscal year 2003. We also recorded charges of $102 for ineffectiveness of other forward contracts in the first six months of fiscal year 2003. There were no such charges in the first six months of fiscal year 2004.

 

Our foreign exchange forward contracts do not significantly subject our results of operations to risk due to exchange rate fluctuations because gains and losses on these contracts generally offset losses and gains on the exposure being hedged.

 

Firmly committed purchase exposure and related hedgingHedging instruments, which were designated as cash flow or fair value hedges, at January 2,December 31, 2004 were as follows:

 

Canadian
Dollars


Firmly committed purchase contracts

12,311

Notional amount of forward contracts

12,125

Average contract amount (Foreign currency/United States dollar)

1.35
   Euros

  Canadian
Dollars


  UK
Pounds


 

Notional amount of forward buy (sales) contracts

  (4,921) 7,250  (7,859)

Average contract amount (Foreign currency/United States dollar)

  0.78  1.30  0.51 

 

At January 2,December 31, 2004, we had unrealized gains of $117,$23, net of tax of $72,$13, related to these derivatives,cash flow hedges, which were included in accumulatedAccumulated other comprehensive income. Scientific-Atlanta has no foreign exchange derivative exposure beyond the second quarter of fiscal year 2005.2006.

 

Unrealized gains and losses on foreign exchange forward contracts which do not meet the criteriaare accounted for hedge accounting in accumulated other comprehensive incomeas fair value hedges are recognized in Other (income) expense. During the six months ended December 31, 2004 and January 2, 2004, and December 27, 2002, we recorded losses of $667 and gains of $423, and $1,014, respectively, related to these contracts. At January 2, 2004, we had forward contracts to buy 4,690 Euros and sell 1,600 British sterling which do not meet the criteria for hedge accounting in accumulated other comprehensive income. These contracts hedged our exposure on Euro-based payablesEuro- and sterling-basedSterling-based receivables.

 

We have market risks associated with the volatility in the value of our non-current marketable securities, which consist of investments in common stock, primarily technology companies, and warrants of publicly traded companies and are stated at market value. Non-current marketable securities are included in Other assets in the Consolidated Statements of Financial Position. All investments in common stock are classified as “available for sale”“available-for-sale” under the provisions of SFAS No. 115, “Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities,” and thus, changes in the fair value of these securities are not included in our Consolidated Statements of Earnings until realized. Unrealized holding gains and losses are included, net of taxes, in accumulatedAccumulated other comprehensive income. We recorded after-tax, unrealized holding gains of $459 and losses of $162 in the first six months of fiscal years 2004 and 2003, respectively.year 2004. No such gains or losses were recorded in the first six months of fiscal year 2005. Realized gains and losses and declines in value judged to be other-than-temporary are included in Other (income) expense. We recorded realized gains of $2,444 on the sale of non-current marketable securities in the first six months of fiscal year 2004. No such gains or losses were recorded in the first six months of fiscal year 2003.2005. We recorded no losses of $6,818 in the first six months of fiscal year 20032005 or 2004 from the other-than-temporary decline in the market value of marketable securities. No such losses were recorded in the first six months of fiscal year 2004.

 

Scientific-Atlanta holds warrants to purchase common stock that are recorded at fair value. The warrants, which are included in Non-current marketable securitiesOther assets in the Consolidated Statements of Financial Position, were valued using the Black-Scholes pricing model. Fluctuations in the volatility of the market price of the common stock for which we hold a

19 of 33


warrant, risk-free rate of return and expiration date of the warrant impact the valuation. During the first six months of fiscal yearyears 2005 and 2004, we recorded unrealized gains of $12 and unrealized losses of $35, respectively, related to the declinechanges in the fair value of warrants in Other (income) expense. During the first six months of fiscal year 2003, we recorded unrealized losses of $632 related to the decline in the fair value of the warrants and a realized gain of $2,491 from the settlement of a collar and related warrant in Other (income) expense.

 

We also have market risks associated with the volatility of our investments in privately-held companies, which consist primarily of securities of emerging technology companies. These investments are carried at cost and are evaluated periodically to determine if declines in fair value are other-than-temporary. Declines in value judged to be other-than-temporary are included in Other (income) expense. We recorded losses of $1,831$692 and $4,224$1,831 in the first six months of fiscal yearsyear 2005 and 2004, and 2003, respectively, from other-than-temporary declines in the fair value of our investments in privately-held companies. Investments in privately-held companies of $5,772 and $6,464 were included in Other assets in the Consolidated Statements of Financial Position at December 31, 2004 and July 2, 2004, respectively.

20 of 36


ITEM 4.CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

 

ITEM 4.CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Within the 90 days prior to the filing date of this report, we carried out an evaluation, under the supervision(a) Disclosure Controls and Procedures. Scientific-Atlanta’s management, with the participation of our management, including our Chairman of the Board, President andits Chief Executive Officer James F. McDonald, and our Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, and Treasurer, Julian W. Eidson, ofhas evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of Scientific-Atlanta’s disclosure controls and procedures (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) ofunder the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended)amended (Exchange Act), as of the end of the fiscal quarterperiod covered by this report. Based on such evaluation, Scientific-Atlanta’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that, as of the end of such period, Scientific-Atlanta’sthe Company’s disclosure controls and procedures are effective in recording, processing, summarizing and reporting, on a timely basis, information required to be disclosed by Scientific-Atlanta in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act.

 

(b) Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. There have not been any changes in Scientific-Atlanta’s internal control over financial reporting (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) ofunder the Exchange Act) that occurred during the second quarter of fiscal year 20042005 that hashave materially affected, or isare reasonably likely to materially affect, Scientific-Atlanta’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

2021 of 3336


PART II – OTHER INFORMATION

 

Item 1.Legal ProceedingsProceedings.

 

We were added as a co-defendant in January 2004 in a previously-filed purported securities action in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (MDL No. 03-MD-1529 (LMM)). The suit is an individual action brought by W.R. Huff Asset Management Co., LLC, reportedly on behalf ofAdelphia and as an investment advisor and attorney-in-fact for certain unnamed purchasers of debt securities issued byCharter Matters

As previously disclosed, Adelphia Communications Corporation and Arahova Communications Inc. The complaint alleges that certain(Adelphia) is one of Adelphia’s underwriters, banks, auditors, law firms, and vendors are liable to plaintiff for various alleged securities laws violations byScientific-Atlanta’s customers. Adelphia and certainseveral members of Adelphia’sits former management. It alleges that certain commercial transactions between Adelphiamanagement are the subjects of civil and/or criminal charges brought by the SEC and Scientific-Atlanta relating tothe Justice Department; two of whom were found guilty of criminal charges. One aspect of the charges concerns Adelphia’s purchase of digital set-top boxes and a marketing support arrangementagreement with Scientific-Atlanta in 2000 and 2001, as well as Adelphia’s marketing support agreement with another vendor, and the manner in which Adelphia accounted for such arrangements.

The SEC and Justice Department have also brought charges against former officers of Charter Communications, another of Scientific-Atlanta’s customers. One aspect of those charges concerns an advertising agreement between Scientific-Atlanta and Charter in 2000, as well as Charter’s advertising agreement with another vendor, and the manner in which Charter accounted for such arrangements. Four former Charter officers pled guilty to certain charges; one of whom has pled guilty to charges related accounting treatment by Adelphia resulted in violationsto the advertising agreement.

The SEC and the Justice Department have subpoenaed records of the anti-fraud provisions of the federal securities lawsScientific-Atlanta and have interviewed Scientific-Atlanta personnel with respect to the purchasersAdelphia and Charter agreements. Scientific-Atlanta has received notice from the SEC and the Justice Department that they are examining the conduct of Adelphia’s securitiesScientific-Atlanta and certain of its officers and employees with respect to these agreements. Scientific-Atlanta is cooperating and providing information in whose interest the plaintiff purports to act. The complaint does not allege any improprietyconnection with these investigations. There can be no assurance as to the outcome of these investigations or the effects of any allegations against Scientific-Atlanta. In addition, any settlements and legal expenses may adversely affect our financial statements or statements made to our investors. The plaintiff is seeking to recover damages from us in an unspecified amount. Scientific-Atlanta intends to vigorously defend the claim.results of operations.

 

On April 8, 2002,Gemstar-Related Legal Proceedings

As previously disclosed, we are involved in several lawsuits, including multi-district patent and antitrust proceedings, Scientific-Atlanta patents proceedings, and International Trade Commission and related proceedings, with Gemstar-TV Guide International, Inc. and affiliated and/or related companies. Gemstar-TV Guide International, Inc. and/or its affiliated entities are referred to hereafter as “Gemstar.”

Regardless of merit, these Gemstar legal proceedings are time-consuming and result in costly litigation, and there can be no assurance that we will prevail in these legal proceedings given the complex technical issues and inherent uncertainties in litigation. During the second quarter of fiscal year 2005, Scientific-Atlanta engaged in substantive discussions with Gemstar regarding a shareholder, Paul Thompson, filedpossible settlement and cross-licensing agreement. No agreement has been reached at this time. If circumstances were to change during the third quarter of fiscal year 2005, Scientific-Atlanta may include, as a putative shareholder’s derivative action purportedlyresult of any settlement, an additional expense or charge in its results of operations for the third quarter of fiscal year 2005. At this time, we cannot assess the probability of a settlement and there can be no assurance as to the outcome of these settlement negotiations.

Item 2.Changes in Securities, Use of Proceeds and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities.

During the three months ended December 31, 2004, the following purchases of our common stock were made by or on behalf of Scientific-Atlanta in the Superior Court of Gwinnett County, Georgia against certain directors and officers of the Company. Although a courtesy copy of the complaint was supplied to us by counsel to the plaintiff shareholder, neither we nor the other defendants were served with the complaint. The complaint was dismissed on June 27, 2003 and then refiled on November 14, 2003, and subsequently served on the Company. This action is based upon substantially the same facts alleged in the securities class action litigation filed in July 2001. This plaintiff shareholder is seeking to recover damages in an unspecified amount.Scientific-Atlanta.

 

Period


  (a) Total
Number of
Shares
Purchased


  (b) Average
Price Paid
per Share


  (c) Total
Number of
Shares
Purchased
as Part of
Publicly
Announced
Plans or
Programs


  (d) Maximum
Number of
Shares that
can be
Purchased
Under the
Plans or
Programs


October 2, 2004 - October 29, 2004

  797,900  $27.20  797,900  8,643,400

October 30, 2004 - November 26, 2004

  1,038,700  $27.92  1,038,700  7,604,700

November 27, 2004 - December 31, 2004

  0   N/A  0  7,604,700

On January 3,

22 of 36


In February 2003, we announced a purported class action alleging violations of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) was also filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia. The action, as amended, was brought against us and severalprogram to buy back up to 10,000,000 shares of our officers and directors alleging breachescommon stock. Purchases of fiduciary obligations to participants in Scientific-Atlanta’s 401(k)our common stock during the second quarter of fiscal year 2005 were made under this plan. As of December 31, 2004, there were 7,604,700 shares available that may yet be purchased under the February 2003 stock repurchase plan. This plan and was based on substantially the same factual allegations as the class action described above. On November 10, 2003, the court granted Plaintiff’s motion to amend his complaint. Plaintiff filed his amended complaint on November 18, 2003has no termination date and we filed a motionmay make additional purchases under this plan. We have no other programs to dismiss this amended complaint on January 21, 2003. Briefing of this motion is ongoing. The Plaintiff seeks unspecified equitable and monetary relief.purchase our common stock.

 

Item 4.Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

 

The following information is furnished with respect to matters submitted to a vote of security holders through the solicitation of proxies:

 

(a)The matters described below were submitted to a vote of security holders at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders held on November 7, 2003.3, 2004.

 

(b)Election of directors:

 

   Votes for

  Withhold Authority

Marion H. Antonini

  114,591,668  2,914,668

David J. McLaughlin

  110,332,728  7,173,608

James V. Napier

  81,220,810  36,285,526

Sam Nunn

  113,979,429  3,526,907
   Votes for

  Withhold
Authority


James I. Cash, Jr.

  131,829,742  2,970,902

James F. McDonald

  131,196,858  3,603,786

Terence F. McGuirk

  132,203,399  2,597,245

 

James I. Cash, Jr.,Marion H. Antonini, David W. Dorman, William E. Kassling, Mylle H. Mangum, David J. McLaughlin, James F. McDonaldV. Napier and Terence F. McGuirkSam Nunn continue as directors.

 

(c)ApprovalRatification of the 2003 Long-Term Incentive Planselection by the Audit Committee of Ernst & Young LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending July 1, 2005:

 

For

 Against

 Abstain

67,720,897 24,049,383 1,002,653

21 of 33


Item 5.Other Information.

We had previously announced that we planned a joint development of an Explorer MC home media center with Digeo Inc., and that Charter Communications would deploy the Explorer MC set-top in calendar year 2003. In accordance with our agreement with Digeo, we timely delivered the necessary PowerTV Operating System application programming interfaces and associated documentation to Digeo during 2003, but Charter did not deploy this set-top during calendar year 2003.

For


 

Against


 

Abstain


132,566,289 1,484,478 749,877

 

Item 6.Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K.Exhibits.

(a)Exhibits.

 

Exhibit No.

  

Description


  4.1First Amendment to Rights Agreement dated February 12, 2004 between Scientific-Atlanta and The Bank of New York, as rights agent.
31.1  Certifications of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.Act.
31.2  Certifications of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.Act.
32.1  Certifications of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.Act.
32.2  Certifications of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.Act.
99.1  Cautionary Statements

 

(b)During the second quarter of fiscal year 2004, we filed one Current Report on Form 8-K dated October 23, 2003 with respect to Item 12- Results of Operations and Financial Condition.

23 of 36


 

SIGNATURES

 

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

 

    

SCIENTIFIC-ATLANTA, INC.

(Registrant)

Date: February 12, 2004

4, 2005
   By: 

/s/ Julian W. Eidson


        

Julian W. Eidson

Senior Vice President,

Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer

(Principal Financial Officer and duly

authorized signatory of the Registrant)

 

2224 of 3336