UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, DC 20549

 


 

FORM 10-Q

 


 

QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF

OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

For the quarterly period ended March 28,September 26, 2004

 

Commission file number: 0-21154

 


 

CREE, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

 


 

North Carolina 56-1572719

(State or other jurisdiction of

incorporation or organization)

 

(I.R.S. Employer

Identification No.)

4600 Silicon Drive

Durham, North Carolina

 27703
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)

 

(919) 313-5300

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

 


 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    x  Yes    ¨  No

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    x  Yes    ¨  No

 

The number of shares outstanding of the registrant’s common stock, par value $0.00125 per share,share; as of April 16,October 18, 2004 was 74,210,059.73,872,433.

 



CREE, INC.

FORM 10-Q

 

For the Quarter Ended March 28,September 26, 2004

 

INDEX

 

     Page No.

PART I.FINANCIAL INFORMATION   

Item 1.

 

Financial Statements

   
  

Consolidated Balance Sheets at March 28,September 26, 2004 (unaudited) and June 29, 200327, 2004

  3
  

Consolidated Statements of Income for the three and nine months ended March 28,September 26, 2004 (unaudited) and March 30,September 28, 2003 (unaudited)

  4
  

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flow for the ninethree months ended March 28,September 26, 2004 (unaudited) and March 30,September 28, 2003 (unaudited)

  5
  

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)

  6

Item 2.

 

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

  2116

Item 3.

 

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

  38

Item 4.

 

Controls and Procedures

  39
PART II.OTHER INFORMATION   

Item 1.

 

Legal Proceedings

  3940

Item 6.

 

Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K

  40

SIGNATURES

  41

PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1 - Financial Statements

 

CREE, INC.

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(In thousands, except per share data)

 

  March 28,
2004


  June 29,
2003


   

September 26,

2004


  June 27,
2004


  (Unaudited)      (Unaudited)  (Audited)

ASSETS

            

Current assets:

            

Cash and cash equivalents

  $100,912  $64,795   $98,546  $81,472

Short-term investments held to maturity

   78,513   75,242    77,462   76,691

Accounts receivable, net

   38,066   43,901    46,110   47,766

Interest receivable

   1,748   1,650    1,695   1,752

Inventories, net

   17,124   17,674    22,813   19,428

Deferred income taxes

   1,863   1,863    2,560   2,560

Prepaid expenses and other current assets

   4,491   4,230    5,251   5,224
  

  


  

  

Total current assets

   242,717   209,355    254,437   234,893

Property and equipment, net

   260,368   251,346    293,918   273,342

Long term investments held to maturity

   61,562   58,794 

Deferred income taxes

   7,045   20,934 

Long-term investments held to maturity

   76,914   72,730

Marketable securities available for sale

   33,191   22,002

Patent and license rights, net

   11,602   7,146    20,491   19,831

Other assets

   15,954   16,119    4,073   5,202
  

  


  

  

Total assets

  $599,248  $563,694   $683,024  $628,000
  

  


  

  

LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY

            

Current liabilities:

            

Accounts payable, trade

  $12,943  $14,916   $31,097  $25,102

Accrued salaries and wages

   6,720   5,756    7,746   8,125

Deferred revenue

   7,070   5,533    7,142   8,437

Income taxes payable

   11,504   —  

Other accrued expenses

   2,822   2,087    2,592   3,318
  

  


  

  

Total current liabilities

   29,555   28,292    60,081   44,982

Long term liabilities:

      

Other long term liabilities

   —     31 

Long-term liabilities:

      

Deferred income taxes

   8,305   3,886
  

  


  

  

Total long term liabilities

   —     31 

Total long-term liabilities

   8,305   3,886

Shareholders’ equity:

            

Preferred stock, par value $0.01; 3,000 shares authorized at March 28, 2004 and June 29, 2003; none issued and outstanding

   —     —   

Common stock, par value $0.00125; 200,000 shares authorized; 74,206 and 74,127 shares issued and outstanding at March 28, 2004 and June 29, 2003, respectively

   92   92 

Preferred stock, par value $0.01; 3,000 shares authorized at September 26, 2004 and June 27, 2004; none issued and outstanding

   —     —  

Common stock, par value $0.00125; 200,000 shares authorized at September 26, 2004 and June 27, 2004; 73,841 and 73,245 shares issued and outstanding at September 26, 2004 and June 27, 2004, respectively

   92   91

Additional paid-in-capital

   523,446   526,318    510,583   506,275

Deferred compensation expense

   —     (218)

Other comprehensive income, net of taxes

   12,396   5,627

Retained earnings

   46,155   9,179    91,567   67,139
  

  


  

  

Total shareholders’ equity

   569,693   535,371    614,638   579,132
  

  


  

  

Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity

  $599,248  $563,694   $683,024  $628,000
  

  


  

  

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.

CREE, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME

(In thousands, except per share data)

(Unaudited)

 

  Three Months Ended

 Nine Months Ended

   Three Months Ended

  March 28,
2004


 March 30,
2003


 March 28,
2004


  March 30,
2003


   September 26,
2004


  September 28,
2003


Revenue:

            

Product revenue, net

  $71,383  $53,774  $197,131  $145,149   $90,186  $59,163

Contract revenue, net

   5,730   6,449   18,877   20,612    5,711   7,048
  


 


 

  


  

  

Total revenue

   77,113   60,223   216,008   165,761    95,897   66,211

Cost of revenue:

            

Product revenue

   33,261   27,018   98,979   79,662 

Contract revenue

   5,021   5,158   16,136   15,824 

Product revenue, net

   37,936   32,503

Contract revenue, net

   4,291   5,492
  


 


 

  


  

  

Total cost of revenue

   38,282   32,176   115,115   95,486    42,227   37,995
  


 


 

  


  

  

Gross profit

   38,831   28,047   100,893   70,275    53,670   28,216

Operating expenses:

            

Research and development

   10,534   8,138   27,196   22,369    11,015   8,327

Sales, general and administrative

   7,888   6,712   23,670   20,993    7,660   7,912

Severance expense

   —     —     —     400 

Impairment of property & equipment

   80   —     226   1,491 

(Gain) on termination of supply agreement

   —     —     —     (5,000)

Other expense

   78   3
  


 


 

  


  

  

Income from operations

   20,329   13,197   49,801   30,022    34,917   11,974

Non-operating income (loss):

      

(Loss) on investments in marketable securities

   (1)  —     —     (2,067)

Other non-operating income (loss)

   598   (29)  1,007   (46)

Interest income

   942   1,199   2,779   3,863 

Non-operating income:

      

Gain on investments in marketable securities

   118   —  

Interest income, net

   1,149   892

Other income

   5   2
  


 


 

  


  

  

Income before income taxes

   21,868   14,367   53,587   31,772    36,189   12,868

Income tax expense

   6,779   3,735   16,612   8,261    11,761   3,989
  


 


 

  


  

  

Net income

  $15,089  $10,632  $36,975  $23,511   $24,428  $8,879
  


 


 

  


  

  

Earnings per share:

            

Basic

  $0.20  $0.15  $0.50  $0.32   $0.33  $0.12
  


 


 

  


  

  

Diluted

  $0.20  $0.14  $0.49  $0.31   $0.32  $0.12
  


 


 

  


  

  

Shares used in per share calculation:

            

Basic

   74,050   73,266   74,143   73,022    73,503   74,174
  


 


 

  


  

  

Diluted

   76,399   75,394   75,979   75,026    75,600   75,754
  


 


 

  


  

  

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.

CREE, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOW

(In thousands)

(Unaudited)

 

  Nine Months Ended

   Three Months Ended

 
  March 28,
2004


 March 30,
2003


   September 26,
2004


 September 28,
2003


 

Operating activities:

      

Net income

  $36,975  $23,511   $24,428  $8,879 

Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:

      

Depreciation of property and equipment

   39,587   30,091    15,210   12,465 

Impairment of property, equipment and patents

   275   1,512 

Loss on disposal of property, equipment and patents

   78   3 

Gain on marketable securities

   (118)  —   

Amortization of patent rights

   602   233    406   183 

Amortization of premium on securities held to maturity

   2,420   —      608   749 

Amortization of deferred compensation

   392   364    —     155 

Deferred income taxes

   13,889   8,181    —     3,881 

Loss on marketable securities

   1   2,067 

Changes in operating assets and liabilities:

      

Accounts and interest receivable

   5,737   (4,674)   1,713   (13,870)

Inventories

   550   330    (3,385)  1,449 

Prepaid expenses and other current assets

   (261)  475 

Prepaid expenses and other assets

   (27)  968 

Accounts payable, trade

   (1,973)  3,318    5,738   357 

Accrued expenses and other liabilities

   3,205   4,018    9,105   3,288 
  


 


  


 


Net cash provided by operating activities

   101,399   69,426    53,756   18,507 
  


 


  


 


Investing activities:

      

Purchase and deposits for property and equipment

   (48,707)  (56,180)   (34,657)  (18,144)

Purchase of securities held to maturity

   (86,698)  (89,284)   (42,132)  (26,785)

Costs associated with the acquisition of ATMI GaN

   (105)  —   

Proceeds from maturities of securities held to maturity

   78,239   48,962    36,687   20,692 

Proceeds from sale of property and equipment

   8   —      25   5 

Proceeds from sale of available for sale securities

   —     3,921 

Other long-term assets

   85   394 

Increase in other long-term assets

   7   —   

Capitalized patent costs

   (5,058)  (2,799)   (921)  (3,590)
  


 


  


 


Net cash used in investing activities

   (62,236)  (94,986)   (40,991)  (27,822)
  


 


  


 


Financing activities:

      

Net proceeds from issuance of common stock

   8,476   3,968    4,309   259 

Repurchase of common stock

   (11,522)  —   
  


 


  


 


Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities

   (3,046)  3,968 

Net cash provided by financing activities

   4,309   259 
  


 


  


 


Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents

   36,117   (21,592)   17,074   (9,056)

Cash and cash equivalents:

      

Beginning of period

   64,795   73,744   $81,472  $64,795 
  


 


  


 


End of period

  $100,912  $52,152   $98,546  $55,739 
  


 


  


 


Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:

      

Cash paid for income taxes

  $2,872  $100   $257  $750 
  


 


  


 


 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.

CREE, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

 

Basis of Presentation

 

The consolidated balance sheet as of March 28,September 26, 2004, the consolidated statements of income for the three and nine months ended March 28,September 26, 2004 and March 30,September 28, 2003, and the consolidated statements of cash flow for the ninethree months ended March 28,September 26, 2004 and March 30,September 28, 2003 have been prepared by the Company and have not been audited. In the opinion of management, all normal and recurring adjustments necessary to present fairly the consolidated financial position, results of operations and cash flow at March 28,September 26, 2004, and for all periods presented, have been made. The consolidated balance sheet at June 29, 200327, 2004 has been derived from the audited financial statements as of that date.

 

Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States have been condensed or omitted. TheseIt is suggested that these condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in the Company’s fiscal 20032004 Annual Report on Form 10-K. The results of operations for the period ended March 28,September 26, 2004 are not necessarily indicative of the operating results that may be attained for the entire fiscal year.

 

Accounting Policies

 

Principles of Consolidation

 

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Cree, Inc., and its wholly-owned subsidiaries, Cree Microwave, Inc. (“Cree Microwave”), Cree Research FSC, Inc. (“FSC”), Cree Funding, LLC (“Cree Funding”), Cree Employee Services Corporation, Cree Technologies, Inc., CI Holdings, Limited, Cree Asia-Pacific, Inc., Cree Japan, Inc, Cree International Holdings Inc. and Cree Japan, Inc.Asia-Pacific Limited. Cree Funding was merged into the Company effective June 27, 2004. All material intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

 

Business Segments

 

The Company operates in two business segments, Cree and Cree Microwave. The Cree segment incorporates its proprietary technology to produce wide bandgap compound semiconductors using silicon carbide, or SiC, and group III nitrides, or GaN, technology. Products from this segment are used in mobile appliances, automotive backlighting, indicator lamps, full color LEDlight emitting diode (“LED”) displays and other lighting applications as well as microwave and power applications. The Cree segment also sells SiC and GaN material products to corporate, government and university research laboratories and generates revenue from contracts with agencies of the U.S. Federal government.government and other parties.

 

The Cree Microwave segment designs, manufactures and markets a line of silicon-based laterally diffused metal oxide semiconductors (“LDMOS”) and bipolar radio frequency power semiconductors and modules, a critical component utilized in building power amplifiers for wireless infrastructure applications.applications as well as products serving military and aeronautics markets.

Summarized financial information concerning the reportable segments as of and for the three and nine months ended March 28,September 26, 2004 and March 30,September 28, 2003 areis shown in the following tables.table. There were no intercompany sales between the Cree segment and the Cree Microwave segment during the comparative periods. The “Other” column represents amounts excluded from specific segments such as interest income write-downs for investments made in marketable equity securities or long-term investments held to maturity and gains or losses on the sale of marketable securities. TheIn addition, the “Other” column also includes corporate assets such as cash and cash equivalents, short-term investments held to maturity, marketable securities, interest receivable and long-term investments held to maturity which have not been allocated to a specific segment.

 

For the three months ended

March 28, 2004 (in thousands)


  Cree

  Cree
Microwave


  Other

  Total

Highlights from the Consolidated Statement of Income:

                

Product revenue

  $69,208  $2,175  $—    $71,383

Contract revenue

   5,730   —     —     5,730
   

  


 

  

Total revenue

   74,938   2,175   —     77,113

Cost of revenue

   35,737   2,545   —     38,282
   

  


 

  

Gross profit (loss)

   39,201   (370)  —     38,831

Research and development

   9,427   1,107   —     10,534

Sales, general and administrative

   7,114   774   —     7,888

Impairment of property & equipment

   50   30   —     80

Other non-operating income

   597   —     —     597

Income (loss) before income taxes

   23,207   (2,281)  942   21,868

Depreciation of property & equipment

  $13,356  $680  $—    $14,036

Other Consolidated Financial Information:

                

Inventories, net

  $16,051  $1,073  $—    $17,124

Property and equipment, net

   250,433   9,935   —     260,368

Additions to property and equipment

   11,252   55   —     11,307

Total assets

  $327,429  $13,495  $258,324  $599,248

For the three months ended

March 30, 2003 (in thousands)


  Cree

  Cree
Microwave


  Other

  Total

Highlights from the Consolidated Statement of Income:

                

Product revenue

  $53,130  $644  $—    $53,774

Contract revenue

   6,449   —     —     6,449
   

  


 

  

Total revenue

   59,579   644   —     60,223

Cost of revenue

   29,797   2,379   —     32,176
   

  


 

  

Gross profit (loss)

   29,782   (1,735)  —     28,047

Research and development

   7,119   1,019   —     8,138

Sales, general and administrative

   5,951   761   —     6,712

Income (loss) before income taxes

   16,683   (3,515)  1,199   14,367

Depreciation of property & equipment

  $10,119  $510  $—    $10,629

Other Consolidated Financial Information:

                

Inventories, net

  $17,216  $420  $—    $17,636

Property and equipment, net

   225,714   12,161   —     237,875

Additions to property and equipment

   15,665   286   —     15,951

Total assets

  $331,415  $13,756  $194,203  $539,374

For the nine months ended

March 28, 2004 (in thousands)


  Cree

  Cree
Microwave


 Other

  Total

As of and for the three months ended

September 26, 2004 (in thousands)


  Cree

  

Cree

Microwave


 Other

  Total

Highlights from the Consolidated Statement of Income:

                  

Product revenue

  $191,922  $5,209  $—    $197,131

Contract revenue

   18,877   —     —     18,877

Product revenue, net

  $88,751  $1,435  $—    $90,186

Contract revenue, net

   5,711   —     —     5,711
  

  


 

  

  

  


 

  

Total revenue

   210,799   5,209   —     216,008   94,462   1,435   —     95,897

Cost of revenue

   106,987   8,128   —     115,115   39,465   2,762   —     42,227
  

  


 

  

  

  


 

  

Gross profit (loss)

   103,812   (2,919)  —     100,893   54,997   (1,327)  —     53,670

Research and development

   24,099   3,097   —     27,196   9,992   1,023   —     11,015

Sales, general and administrative

   21,557   2,113   —     23,670

Impairment of property & equipment

   53   173   —     226

Selling, general and administrative

   6,839   821   —     7,660

Other expense

   78   —     —     78

Other non-operating income

   978   29   —     1,007   5   —     —     5

Income (loss) before income taxes

   59,082   (8,274)  2,779   53,587   38,093   (3,171)  1,267   36,189

Depreciation of property & equipment

  $37,615  $1,972  $—    $39,587

Depreciation and amortization

  $14,961  $655   —    $15,616

Other Consolidated Financial Information:

                  

Inventories, net

  $20,868  $1,945  $—    $22,813

Property and equipment, net

   284,515   9,403   —     293,918

Additions to property and equipment

  $48,452  $255  $—    $48,707   33,825   832   —     34,657

Total assets

  $378,383  $13,911  $290,730  $683,024

For the nine months ended

March 30, 2003 (in thousands)


  Cree

  Cree
Microwave


 Other

  Total

As of and for the three months ended

September 28, 2003 (in thousands)


  Cree

  Cree
Microwave


 Other

  Total

Highlights from the Consolidated Statement of Income:

                  

Product revenue

  $143,052  $2,097  $—    $145,149

Contract revenue

   20,612   —     —     20,612

Product revenue, net

  $58,113  $1,050  $—    $59,163

Contract revenue, net

   7,048   —     —     7,048
  

  


 

  

  

  


 

  

Total revenue

   163,664   2,097   —     165,761   65,161   1,050   —     66,211

Cost of revenue

   85,764   9,722   —     95,486   35,201   2,794   —     37,995
  

  


 

  

  

  


 

  

Gross profit (loss)

   77,900   (7,625)  —     70,275   29,960   (1,744)  —     28,216

Research and development

   18,999   3,370   —     22,369   7,330   997   —     8,327

Sales, general and administrative

   18,957   2,036   —     20,993

Severance expenses

   —     400   —     400

Impairment of property & equipment

   1,491   —     —     1,491

Gain on termination of supply agreement

   —     5,000   —     5,000

Loss on investments in marketable securities

   —     —     2,067   2,067

Selling, general and administrative

   7,250   662   —     7,912

Other expense

   3   —     —     3

Other non-operating income

   2   —     —     2

Income (loss) before income taxes

   38,424   (8,448)  1,796   31,772   15,379   (3,403)  892   12,868

Depreciation of property & equipment

  $28,356  $1,735  $—    $30,091

Depreciation and amortization

  $12,021  $627   —    $12,648

Other Consolidated Financial Information:

                  

Inventories, net

  $15,653  $572  $—    $16,225

Property and equipment, net

   245,697   11,258   —     256,955

Additions to property and equipment

  $55,114  $1,066  $—    $56,180   18,087   57   —     18,144

Total assets

  $350,846  $13,317  $212,470  $576,633

Reclassifications

 

Certain fiscal 20032004 amounts in the accompanying consolidated financial statements have been reclassified to conform to the fiscal 20042005 presentation. These reclassifications had no effect on previously reported consolidated net income or shareholders’ equity.

 

Fiscal Year

 

The Company’s fiscal year is a 52- or52-or 53-week period ending on the last Sunday in the month of June. The Company’s 2005 fiscal year extends from June 28, 2004 through June 26, 2005 and is a 52-week fiscal year. The Company’s 2004 fiscal year extendsextended from June 30, 2003 through June 27, 2004 and is a 52-week fiscal year. The Company’s 2003 fiscal year extended from July 1, 2002 through June 29, 2003 and was a 52-week fiscal year.

 

Estimates

 

The preparation of the consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities, at March 28,September 26, 2004 and June 29, 200327, 2004 and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the three and nine months ended March 28,September 26, 2004 and March 30,September 28, 2003. Actual amounts could differ from those estimates.

 

Earnings per share

The following computation reconciles the differences between the basic and diluted earnings per share presentations:

   Three Months
Ended
September 26,
2004


  Three Months
Ended
September 28,
2003


   (in thousands, except per share
amounts)

Basic:

        

Net income

  $24,428  $8,879
   

  

Weighted average common shares

   73,503   74,174
   

  

Basic earnings per share

  $0.33  $0.12
   

  

Diluted:

        

Net income

  $24,428  $8,879
   

  

Weighted average common shares-basic

   73,503   74,174

Dilutive effect of stock options

   2,097   1,580
   

  

Weighted average common shares-diluted

   75,600   75,754
   

  

Diluted earnings per share

  $0.32  $0.12
   

  

Potential common shares that would have the effect of increasing diluted earnings per share are considered to be antidilutive. In accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 128, “Earnings Per Share,” these shares were not included in calculating diluted earnings per share. For the three months ending September 26, 2004 and September 28, 2003, there were 4.4 million and 8.0 million shares, respectively, not included in calculating diluted earnings per share because their effect was antidilutive.

Business Combination

The Company acquired the GaN substrate and epitaxy business of Advanced Technology Materials, Inc. (“ATMI”) effective March 31, 2004. The Company signed a definitive agreement to purchase the intellectual property, fixed assets and inventory of this business for $10.3 million in cash. The Company accounted for this transaction under the purchase method and there was no resulting goodwill. The operating results of the assets acquired from ATMI are included in the accompanying consolidated statements of income from the date of acquisition.

As part of the acquisition, the Company planned and is in the process of relocating the acquired GaN substrate and epitaxy business into its North Carolina operations. The Company originally established a $315,000 liability to cover relocation costs of employees and equipment in its quarter ended June 27, 2004. For the quarter ended September 26, 2004, the Company has increased the liability by $256,000 to provide for costs to be incurred in vacating the business’s former location. The following table summarizes the changes in the Company’s relocation liability for the three-months ended September 26, 2004:

   

For the Three Months Ended
September 26, 2004

(in thousands)


 

Balance at beginning of period

  $285 

Additional relocation costs

   256 

Relocation costs incurred and/or paid

   (117)
   


Balance at end of period

  $424 
   


Revenue Recognition

 

Revenue on product sales is recognized when persuasive evidence of a contract exists, such as when a purchase order or contract is received from the customer, the price is fixed, title of the goods has transferred and there is a reasonable assurance of collection of the sales proceeds. The Company obtains written purchase authorizations from its customers for a specified amount of product at a specified price and considers delivery to have occurred at the time of shipment. The majority of the Company’s products have shipping terms that are FOBfree on board (“FOB”) or FCAfree carrier alongside (“FCA”) shipping point, which means that the Company fulfills the obligation to deliver when the goods are handed over and into the charge of the carrier at itsthe Company’s shipping dock. This means that the buyer bears all costs and risks of loss or damage to the goods from that point. The difference between FOB and FCA is that under FCA terms, the customer designates a shipping carrier of choice to be used. In certain cases, the Company ships its product CIF.products cost insurance freight (“CIF”). Under this arrangement, revenue is recognized under FOB shipping point shipping terms;terms, however, the Company is responsible for the cost of insurance during shipmentto transport the product as well as the cost to ship the product.

For all of its sales other than those with CIF terms, the Company invoices its customers only for shipping costs necessary to physically move the product from its place of business to the customer’s location. The costs primarily consist of overnight shipping charges. The Company incurs the direct shipping costs on behalf of the customer and invoices the customer to obtain direct reimbursement for such costs. The Company accounts for its shipping costs by recording the amount of freight that is invoiced to its customers as revenue, with the corresponding cost recorded as cost of revenue. For the threethree-month period ended September 26, 2004 and nine months ended MarchSeptember 28, 2004, amounts2003, the Company recognized $42,000 and $26,000, respectively, as revenue for shipping and handling costs were $27,400 and $79,500, respectively. In fiscal 2003, shipping costs were not material and the Company accounted for such costs as a cost of revenue with the reimbursement of these costs reflected as a direct offset and reduction of cost of revenue.costs. If inventory is maintained at a consigned location, revenue is recognized when the Company’s customer pulls product for its use.

use and the title of the goods is transferred to the customer. The Company provides its customers with limited rights of return for non-conforming shipments and warranty claims. The Company accrues estimated warranty expense as a cost of revenue.claims for up to 36 months for Cree Microwave products and for lesser periods for Cree products. The Company records a reserve for estimated sales returns, which is reflected as a reduction of revenue at the time of revenue recognition.

Certain of the Company’s customersales arrangements provide for limited product exchanges and reimbursement of certain sales costs. For two customers, with these arrangements,Sumitomo Corporation (“Sumitomo”) and OSRAM Opto Semiconductors GmbH (“OSRAM”), the Company defers revenue equal to the levellevels specified in these contractual arrangements and recognizes the related revenue less any claims made against the reserves when the customer’s exchange rights expire and the deferred revenue reserves are released. The reserve expires no later than two quarters from the date of the original sale. In connection with the Company’s distributorour sales agreement with Sumitomo, Corporation (“Sumitomo”), such deferred revenue amounted to $6.5$6.6 million and $5.3$7.9 million as of March 28,September 26, 2004 and June 29, 2003,27, 2004, respectively. In connection with the Company’s purchaseour agreement with OSRAM, Opto Semiconductors Gmbh (“Osram”), such deferred revenue amounted to $365,000$531,000 and $0$471,000 as of March 28,September 26, 2004 and June 29, 2003,27, 2004, respectively.

 

Historically, the Company has experienced only nominal credit losses from customers’ inability to pay. Any uncollectibility of receivables is primarily due to returned products. Therefore, the Company records an allowance for sales returns at the time of sale. Significant judgments and

estimates made by management are used in connection with establishing the allowance for sales returns. Material differences may result in the actual amount and timing of the Company’s revenue for any period in which management made different judgments or utilized different estimates. The allowance for sales returns at March 28,September 26, 2004 and June 29, 200327, 2004 was $824,000$737,000 and $644,000,$798,000, respectively.

 

Revenue from government contracts and certain private entities is recorded on the proportional performance method as contract expenses are incurred. Contract revenue represents contracts withreimbursement by various U.S. Government entities and certain private entitiesother parties to perform research and development work related toaid in the development of new technology. The applicable contracts generally provide that the Company’s technologies.Company may elect to retain ownership of inventions made in performing the work, subject to a non-exclusive license retained by the government to practice the inventions for government purposes. The contract funding may be based on either a cost-plus or a cost-share arrangement. The amount of funding under each contract is determined based on cost estimates that include direct costs, plus an allocation for research and development, general and administrative and the cost of capital expenses. Cost-plus funding is determined based on actual costs plus a set percentage margin. The applicableFor the cost-share contracts, generally provide thatthe actual costs relating to the activities to be performed by the Company may elect to retain ownership of inventions made in performingunder the work, subject to a non-exclusive license retained bycontract are divided between the

government or funding entity to practice U.S. Government and the inventions for limited purposes. Contract revenue includes funding of direct research and development costs and a portionCompany based on the terms of the Company’s generalcontract. The government’s cost share is then paid to the Company. Activities performed under these arrangements include research regarding SiC and administrative expensesGaN materials and other operating expensesdevices. The contracts typically require the submission of a written report that documents the results of such research, as well as some material deliverables.

The revenue and expense classification for contract activities is based on the nature of the contract. For contracts under whichwhere the Company anticipates that funding is expected towill exceed direct costs over the life of the contract. The specific reimbursement provisionscontract, funding is reported as contract revenue and all direct costs are reported as costs of the contracts, including the portion of the Company’s general and administrative expenses and other reimbursable operating expenses vary by contract. Such reimbursements are recorded as contract revenue. For contracts under which the Company anticipates that direct costs of the activities subject to the contract will exceed amounts to be funded over the life of the contract, (i.e., certain cost share arrangements), the Company reports direct costs are reported as research and development expenses withand related reimbursements recordedfunding is reported as an offset toof those expenses.

 

Cash and Cash Equivalents

 

Cash and cash equivalents consist of unrestricted cash accounts and liquid investments with an original maturity of three months or less when purchased.

 

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

 

The carrying amounts of cash and cash equivalents, investments held to maturity accounts and interest receivable, accounts payable and other liabilities approximate fair values at March 28,September 26, 2004 and June 29, 2003.27, 2004.

 

Investments

 

Investments are accounted for using the specific identification method and in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”)No. 115 “Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities” (“SFAS 115”).Securities.” This statement requires certain securities to be classified into three categories:

 

(a)Securities Held-to-Maturity- DebtHeld-to-Maturity-Debt securities that the entity has the positive intent and ability to hold to maturity are reported at amortized cost.

(b)Trading Securities- DebtSecurities-Debt and equity securities that are bought and held principally for the purpose of selling in the near term are reported at fair value, with unrealized gains and losses included in earnings.

 

(c)Securities Available-for-Sale- DebtAvailable-for-Sale-Debt and equity securities not classified as either securities held-to-maturity or trading securities are reported at fair value with unrealized gains or losses excluded from earnings and reported as a separate component of shareholders’ equity.

 

At March 28,As of September 26, 2004 and June 27, 2004, the Company held no marketable securities. Duringa long-term equity investment in the second quartercommon stock of fiscal 2003, the Company sold its remaining position in two publicly traded companies. The first company was Microvision, Inc.Color Kinetics, Incorporated (“Microvision”) and the second one was Emcore Corporation (“Emcore”Color Kinetics”). Prior to the sales, the Company owned 356,000 common shares of Microvision at a total cost of $14.3 millionIn fiscal 2001 and 691,000 shares of Emcore at a total cost of $13.8 million. In June 2002, the Company recorded a charge through non-operating expensepurchased an aggregate of 2,202,442 shares of Color Kinetics stock in private investment rounds for an aggregate of $12.7 million. On June 22, 2004, the shares of Color Kinetics’ stock were approved for quotation on the consolidated statement of operations for an “other than temporary” decline in value, which reduced the value of the Microvision investment to $1.9 million, which was the market value as of June 28, 2002. These shares were sold during the three months ended December 29, 2002 for $1.9 million, with a net loss on the sale recognized for $36,000.

During the second quarter of fiscal 2003, the Company also sold 691,000 common shares of Emcore. These shares were purchased between June 2001 and October 2001.Nasdaq National Market. The Company recorded a charge through non-operating expense on the consolidated statements of operationsaccounts for its shares in June 2002 for an “other than temporary” decline in value that reduced the value of this investment to $4.1 million, which was the market valueColor Kinetics as of June 28, 2002. These shares were sold during the three months ended December 29, 2002 for $2.1 million, with a net loss on the sale recognized for $2.0 million during the second quarter of fiscal 2003.

Management viewed these investments as strategic in nature and therefore the shares were accounted for as “available-for-sale”available-for-sale securities under SFAS 115. The Company carried these investments at fair value, based on quoted market prices, andAccordingly, unrealized gains or losses on Color Kinetics’ shares are excluded from earnings and losses, net of taxes, were includedare recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income, (loss), which is reflectednet of tax. Management classifies the shares as a separate componentlong-term investment as the Company has the intent and the ability to hold these shares. As of shareholders’ equity. Realized gainsSeptember 26, 2004 and losses are recognized upon sale or when declinesJune 27, 2004, the Company had recorded a cumulative unrealized holding gain on its investment in value are deemed to be “other than temporary”Color Kinetics of $20.5 million and $9.3 million, respectively, (or $12.4 million and $5.6 million, net of tax, respectively). This unrealized gain was based on the consolidated statementsmost recent closing stock price as of income.September 26, 2004 and June 27, 2004, to determine the fair market value of the Company’s investment of $33.2 million and $22.0 million, respectively. The Company reviews equity holdings onis restricted from selling its shares in Color Kinetics for a regular basis to evaluate whether or not each security has experienced an “other-than-temporary” declineperiod of 180 days from June 22, 2004, the date of Color Kinetics’ initial public offering and considers its investment in fair value. This policy requires, among other things, the review of each of the companies’ cash position, stock price performance, liquidity, ability to raise capital and management\ownership. Based on this review, if the Company determined that an “other-than-temporary” decline existed in the value of marketable equity securities, it is the Company’s policy to write down these equity investments to the respective market value. Any related write-down would then be recorded as an investment loss on the Company’s consolidated statements of income. In the fourth quarter of fiscal 2002, the Company determined that an “other-than-temporary” decline in market value had occurred in both of these marketable equity investments. Accordingly, the Company wrote down these equity investments to their market values at June 30, 2002 and recorded the unrealized losses, previously recordedColor Kinetics as a comprehensive loss in shareholders’ equity, as a non-operating loss on the Company’s consolidated statements of operations for the year then ended. The total amount of the charge to non-operating expenses in the consolidated statements of operations for the year ended June 30, 2002 relating to these investments was $22.0 million.long-term investment.

 

As of March 28,September 26, 2004 and June 29, 2003,27, 2004, the Company had investments in the equity of privately held companies with carrying values of $15.6$2.9 million for each period. These privately held investments are accounted for under the cost method and are included in “other assets” in the consolidated balance sheets.

 

Comprehensive Income

Comprehensive income consists of the following:

   Three Months Ended
September 26, 2004


  Three Months Ended
September 28, 2003


Net Income

  $24,428  $8,879

Other comprehensive income:

        

Gain on available for sale securities, net of taxes

   6,769   —  
   

  

Comprehensive Income

  $31,197  $8,879
   

  

Inventories

 

Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market, with cost determined using the first-in, first-out (“FIFO”) method for finished goods and work in processwork-in-progress accounts. The Company uses the average cost method for raw materials for the Cree segment. The Cree Microwave segment uses a standard cost method to value its inventory. It is the Company’s policy to record a reserve against inventory once it has been determined that conditions exist which may not allow the Company to sell the inventory for its intended purpose, the inventory’s value is determined to be less than cost or it is determined to be obsolete. The charge for the inventory reserves is recorded in cost of revenue on the consolidated statements of income. The Company evaluates inventory levels at least quarterly against sales forecasts on a part-by-part basis, in addition to determining its overall inventory risk. Reserves are adjusted monthly to reflect inventory values in excess of forecasted sales, as well as overall inventory risk assessed by management.

As of March 28,September 26, 2004, the Company maintained a $1.1 million$681,000 reserve for inventory. Of this total amount, $770,000$282,000 is attributable to the Cree Microwave segment and $318,000$399,000 is attributable to the Cree segment.

The majority of the inventory reserve at Cree Microwave was recorded during the second quarter of fiscal 2003 resulting from the termination of the supply agreement with Spectrian Corporation (“Spectrian”). In exchange for a one-time payment of $5.0 million recorded as “other operating income” on the consolidated statements of income, the Company relieved Spectrian of further obligations to purchase product under the supply agreement that was originally signed in December 2000. For the three months ended December 29, 2002, Cree Microwave recorded an additional reserve of $1.3 million for inventory targeted for sale to Spectrian, which included some customized parts.The Company destroyed a portion of the inventory previously reserved during the fiscal 2003 and fiscal 2004, and as a result, the related items were taken out of inventory and the related reserve. There was no financial impact to the statements of income when these items were destroyed. The Company still maintains some inventory included in the reserve that are no longer available from third party suppliers or are available only with lengthy lead timeframes. The Company also has “last time buy” contracts with Remec, Inc. (which purchased Spectrian) for devices that use this inventory. However, the Company plans to dispose of this remaining inventory when the “last time buy” rights expire. Therefore, with the exception of certain inventory covered under “last time buy” obligations, all items previously reserved have now been scrapped and removed from inventory and the related reserve account. These reserves were recorded as a cost of revenue when they were established. In addition, $417,000 of LDMOS8 product was also written off as a research and development expenditure during the first quarter of fiscal 2003 as it related to prototype devices that were initially accepted by Spectrian and later rejected. These parts were never sold.

Cree segment results for the nine months ended March 30, 2003 include a $784,000 additional reserve for LED and wafer inventories as management assessed the inventory to be slow moving or obsolete. The Company also recorded a $185,000 lower of cost or market adjustment to certain LED products based on management’s estimate of an average sales price for the products during the nine months ended March 30, 2003. These adjustments were recorded to cost of revenue. During the first nine months of fiscal 2003, the Company also wrote off $1.0 million of the initial XBright® chips that were developed during fiscal 2002. An improved chip had replaced these devices and this write-down was recorded as a research and development expense as the initial devices were prematurely launched and not commercially viable. In addition, customers had returned the entire product line that was initially shipped after determining that the chips did not meet their specifications.

 

The following is a summary of inventory (in thousands):

 

  March 28,
2004


 June 29,
2003


   September 26,
2004


 

June 27,

2004


 

Raw materials

  $3,546  $4,410   $4,827  $4,227 

Work-in-progress

   7,456   5,397    9,318   8,083 

Finished goods

   7,209   9,944    9,349   7,813 
  


 


  


 


   18,211   19,751    23,494   20,123 

Inventory reserve

   (1,087)  (2,077)   (681)  (695)
  


 


  


 


Total inventory, net

  $17,124  $17,674   $22,813  $19,428 
  


 


  


 


Property and Equipment

 

Property and equipment are recorded at cost and depreciated on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful lives of the assets, which range from three to forty years. Leasehold improvements are amortized over the lesser of the asset life or the life of the related lease. Expenditures for repairs and maintenance are charged to expense as incurred. The costs for major renewals and improvements are capitalized and depreciated over their estimated useful lives. The cost and related accumulated depreciation of the assets are removed from the accounts upon disposition and any resulting gain or loss is reflected in operations.the consolidated statements of income.

 

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

 

In accordance with SFASStatement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 144, “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets,” the Company reviewsrecords long-lived assets for impairment based on changes in circumstances that indicate their carrying amounts may not be recoverable. The Company reviews an undiscountedthe discounted cash flow analysis for the Cree Microwave

segment to test for impairment of its assets on a quarterly basis. During the three and nine months ended March 28,September 26, 2004 and March 30,September 28, 2003, there was no impairment recorded on these assets. There can be no assurance that future analysis of Cree Microwave’s discounted cash flow will not result in a charge to earnings.

During the second quarter of fiscal 2004, the Company’s Cree Microwave segment identified certain equipment to be sold, which had a carrying value in excess of its fair market value. The Company recorded a charge of $143,000 as of December 28, 2003, which was reflected as an impairment of property and equipment in the consolidated statement of income. In the third quarter of fiscal 2004, the Company determined that this equipment was not salable and wrote off the remaining value of $30,000 as an impairment of property and equipment. The Company also wrote off $50,000 of equipment that was disposed of at the Cree segment’s facility.

 

Patent and License Rights

 

Patent rights reflect costs incurred to enhance and maintain the Company’s intellectual property position. License rights reflect costs incurred to use the intellectual property of others. Both are amortized on a straight-line basis over the lesser of 20 years from the date of patent application the remaining life of the patent or over the license period. The related amortization expense was $215,000$406,000 and $602,000$183,000 for the three and nine months ended MarchSeptember 26, 2004 and September 28, 2004, respectively. The related amortization expense was $78,000 and $233,000 for the three and nine months ended March 30, 2003, respectively.

 

Research and Development

 

The U.S. Government and certain private entities providehave provided funding through research contracts for several of the Company’s current research and development efforts. The contract funding may be based on either a cost-plus or a cost-share arrangement. The amount of funding under each contract is determined based on cost estimates that include direct costs, plus an allocation for

research and development, general and administrative and the cost of capital expenses. Cost-plus funding is determined based on actual costs plus a set percentage margin. For the cost-share contracts, the actual costs are divided between the U.S. Government or other funding entity and the Company based on the terms of the contract. The funding party’sgovernment’s cost share is then paid to the Company. Activities performed under these arrangements include research regarding SiC and GaN materials and devices. The contracts typically require the submission of a written report documentingthat documents the results of such research, as well as some material deliverables.

 

The revenue and expense classification for contract activities is based on the nature of the contract. For contracts where the Company anticipates that funding will exceed direct costs over the life of the contract, funding is reported as contract revenue and all direct costs are reported as costs of contract revenue. For contracts under which the Company anticipates that direct costs will exceed amounts to be funded over the life of the contract, costs are reported as research and development expenses and related funding as an offset of those expenses. For the three and nine months ended March 28,September 26, 2004 and March 30,September 28, 2003, there were no contracts for which direct expenses exceeded funding.

 

Company funded researchProduct Warranty Costs

Accrued expenses include amounts accrued for product warranty expenses at both the Cree, Inc. and development is expensedCree Microwave segments. Cree Microwave accrues 0.5% of product revenue as incurred. Customers did not contribute funds towarda warranty liability each month and maintains the reserve for 36 months after the date of sale pursuant to our warranty terms with our customers. The Cree segment records warranty expense up to 21 months based on an experience factor for product researchreturns and development activities during fiscal 2004. Customers contributed $500,000pursuant to warranty terms with its customers. The following table summarizes the changes in the Company’s product warranty

liability for the nine monthsthree-month periods ended March 30,September 26, 2004 and September 28, 2003 toward product research and development activities. This amount was recorded as an offset to research and development expense. As of March28, 2004, there was no product research and development commitment recorded as a reduction to research and development expenses to fund future research and development activities for the Company.(in thousands):

   For Three Months Ended

   September 26,
2004


  September 28,
2003


Balance at beginning of period

  $680  $341

Accruals for warranty expense

   86   5

Reversals due to use or expiration of liability

   (51)  —  
   


 

Balance at end of period

  $715  $346
   


 

 

Income Taxes

 

The Company has established an estimated tax provision based upon an effective rate of 31%32.5% for the three and nine months ended March 28,September 26, 2004. The Company’s effective tax rate was 26%31% for the three and nine months ended March 30,September 28, 2003. The estimated effective rate was based upon estimates of income for the fiscal year and the Company’s ability to use remaining net operating loss carryforwards and other tax credits. However, the actual effective rate may vary depending upon actual pre-tax book income for the year and other factors. Income taxes have been accounted for using the liability method in accordance with SFASStatement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes”.Taxes.” Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the expected tax consequences of temporary differences between the tax bases of assets and liabilities and their reported amounts.

Stock Options

 

The Company accounts for stock basedstock-based employee compensation under APBAccounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees,” and does not intend to adopt the fair value method of accounting for stock based employee compensation defined by SFASStatement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123, “Accounting for Stock Based Compensation” (“SFAS 123”). The Company has adopted stock plans under which options for the purchase of common stock have been granted to employees and directors of the Company. The following table illustrates the effect on net income and net income per share if the Company had applied the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS 123, as amended (in thousands, except per share amounts):

 

  

Three Months
Ended

March 28,
2004


 Nine Months
Ended
March 28,
2004


   

Three Months

Ended
September 26,
2004


  

Three Months
Ended

September 28,
2003


Net income, as reported

  $15,089  $36,975   $24,428  $8,879

Add: Stock-based employee compensation expense included in reported net income, net of related tax effects

   12   152    —     71

Deduct: Stock-based employee compensation expense determined under fair value based method for all awards, net of related tax effects

   (8,707)  (25,104)

Deduct: Stock-based employee compensation expense determined under the fair value based method for all awards, net of related tax effects

   5,058   7,141
  


 


  

  

Pro forma net income

  $6,394  $12,023   $19,370  $1,809

Basic earnings per share, as reported

  $0.20  $0.50   $0.33  $0.12

Pro forma basic net income per share

  $0.09  $0.16 

Pro forma basic net earnings per share

  $0.26  $0.02

Diluted earnings per share, as reported

  $0.20  $0.49   $0.32  $0.12

Pro forma diluted net income per share

  $0.08  $0.16 
  

Three Months
Ended

March 30,
2003


 Nine Months
Ended
March 30,
2003


 

Net income, as reported

  $10,632  $23,511 

Add: Stock-based employee compensation expense included in reported net income, net of related tax effects

   79   238 

Deduct: Stock-based employee compensation expense determined under fair value based method for all awards, net of related tax effects

   (11,719)  (37,215)
  


 


Pro forma net income (loss)

  $(1,008) $(13,466)

Basic earnings per share, as reported

  $0.15  $0.32 

Pro forma basic net income (loss) per share

  $(0.01) $(0.18)

Diluted earnings per share, as reported

  $0.14  $0.31 

Pro forma diluted net income (loss) per share

  $(0.01) $(0.18)

Pro forma diluted net earnings per share

  $0.26  $0.02

On March 17, 2003, the Company made an offer to exchange options to purchase an aggregate of 3,482,128 shares of the Company’s common stock held by eligible employees (the “Offer”). Directors and executive officers were not eligible to participate in the Offer. The options subject to the Offer were granted under the Company’s Equity Compensation Plan and 2001 Stock Option Bonus Plan at exercise prices greater than $30.00 per share. The Offer, including all withdrawal rights, expired at 12:00 midnight Eastern Time on Friday, April 11, 2003. On April 12, 2003, the Company accepted for cancellation options to purchase 1,663,600 shares of its common stock, tendered by 91 eligible employees, representing approximately 48% of the options that were eligible to be tendered in the Offer. Subject to the terms and conditions of the Offer, the Company granted new options to purchase approximately 562,852 shares of its common stock on October 13, 2003 in exchange for the options tendered and accepted. The new

options were granted under the Company’s Equity Compensation Plan with an exercise price equal to the last sale price of the Company’s common stock reported by the Nasdaq National Market on the new option grant date or $19.88 per share. The new options became vested on April 13, 2004. After this date, the vesting schedule of each new option will be the same as the corresponding canceled option in percentage terms.

Shareholders’ Equity

On January 18, 2001, Cree announced that its Board of Directors had authorized the repurchase of up to 4.0 million shares of its outstanding common stock through January 2002. Additionally, on March 22, 2001, Cree announced that its Board of Directors had increased the repurchase limits under the stock repurchase program announced in January 2001 to include an additional three million shares. In February 2004, the Board of Directors extended the repurchase program through February 2005. During the second quarter of fiscal 2004, the Company repurchased 664,000 shares at an average price of $17.35 per share with an aggregate value of approximately $11.5 million. There were no repurchases made during the third quarter of fiscal 2004. Since the inception of the stock repurchase program, Cree has repurchased 4.0 million shares of its common stock at an average price of $15.61 per share, with an aggregate value of $62.5 million.

The Company intends to use available cash to finance purchases under the program. At the discretion of the Company’s management, the repurchase program can be implemented through open market or privately negotiated transactions. The Company will determine the time and extent of repurchases based on its evaluation of market conditions and other factors.

Contingencies

 

Shareholder LawsuitsIn re Cree, Inc. Securities Litigation

 

As reported in ourthe Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal 2003 and in our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the second quarter of fiscalyear ended June 27, 2004, there is pending in the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina a consolidated class action seeking damages for alleged violations of securities laws by the Company and certain of our officers and current and former directors. In February 2004, wethe Company moved that the court dismiss the consolidated amended complaint on the grounds that it failsfailed to state a claim upon which relief can be granted and doesdid not satisfy the pleading requirements under applicable law. The motion is currently pending.

As also reported in our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the second quarter of fiscal 2004, there was pending before the same court a purported derivative action that named certain of our directors as defendants and named the Company as a nominal defendant. In FebruaryOn August 30, 2004, the individual defendants moved that the court dismiss the derivative complaint on the ground that it failed to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. The plaintiff subsequently filed a motion, which the defendants did not oppose, requesting that the court allow the plaintiff to dismiss the action voluntarily without prejudice. The court entered an order granting the motion to dismiss without prejudice and dismissingallotting 45 days for the derivative actionplaintiffs to file an amended consolidated complaint. The plaintiffs filed a First Amended Consolidated Class Action Complaint on October 14, 2004, asserting essentially the same claims and seeking the same relief as in Marchtheir prior complaint. The Company expects to file a motion to dismiss the Amended Complaint on or before November 15, 2004.

The Company believes that the claims set forth in the amended consolidated complaint are without merit. However, the Company is unable to predict the final outcome of these matters with certainty. The Company’s failure to successfully defend against these allegations could have a material adverse effect on its business, financial condition and results of operations.

 

Trustees of Boston University and Cree Lighting Company v. AXT, Inc.

As reported in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal 2003, in June 2003 Boston University and our subsidiary, Cree Lighting Company (which later merged into Cree, Inc.), commenced a

patent infringement lawsuit against AXT, Inc. in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. In March 2004, Boston University and the Company reached a settlement with AXT in which the parties agreed to the dismissal of all claims and counterclaims. The resolution of the disputes is reflected in the Company’s consolidated financial statements for the third quarter of fiscal 2004.

Other Legal Proceedings

During the third quarter of fiscalthree months ended September 26, 2004, there were no other material developments in the legal proceedings previously reported in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal 2003 and our Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q for the first two quarters of fiscal 2004. Please refer to Part I, Item 3 of theCompany’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 29, 2003 and Part II,27, 2004. Please refer to Item 13 of the Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q for the quarterly periods ended September 28, 2003 and December 28, 2003, respectively,10-K for a description of other material legal proceedings.

The Company is also involved in other legal proceedings not described in this report or in the reports noted above. Although the final resolution of these other matters cannot be predicted with certainty, management’s present judgment is that the final outcome of these matters will not likely have a material adverse effect on the Company’s consolidated financial condition or results of operations. If an unfavorable resolution occurs in these legal proceedings, our financial condition and results of operations could be materially adversely affected.

Earnings Per Share

The following computation reconciles the differences between the basic and diluted earnings per share presentations:

   Three Months Ended

  Nine Months Ended

   March 28,
2004


  March 30,
2003


  March 28,
2004


  March 30,
2003


   (In thousands, except per share amounts)

Net income

  $15,089  $10,632  $36,975  $23,511

Weighted average common shares

   74,050   73,266   74,143   73,022
   

  

  

  

Basic earnings per common share

  $0.20  $0.15  $0.50  $0.32
   

  

  

  

Net income

  $15,089  $10,632  $36,975  $23,511

Diluted weighted average common shares:

                

Common shares outstanding

   74,050   73,266   74,143   73,022

Dilutive effect of stock options and warrants

   2,349   2,128   1,836   2,004
   

  

  

  

Total diluted weighted average common shares

   76,399   75,394   75,979   75,026
   

  

  

  

Diluted earnings per common share

  $0.20  $0.14  $0.49  $0.31
   

  

  

  

Potential common shares that would have the effect of increasing diluted earnings per share are considered to be antidilutive. In accordance with SFAS 128, “Earnings Per Share,” these shares were not included in calculating diluted earnings per share. For the three and nine months ended March 28, 2004, there were 4.6 million and 8.4 million shares, respectively, not included in calculating diluted earnings per share because their effect was antidilutive. For the three and nine months ended March 30, 2003, there were 9.5 million and 10.1 million shares, respectively, not included in calculating diluted earnings per share because their effect was antidilutive.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In July 2002, the FASB issued SFAS 146, “Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities” (“SFAS 146”). SFAS 146, which nullified EITF Issue 94-3, “Liability Recognition for Certain Employee Termination Benefits and Other Costs to Exit an Activity (including Certain Costs Incurred in a Restructuring),” requires that a liability for a cost associated with an exit or disposal activity be recognized when the liability is incurred. Under EITF Issue 94-3, a liability for an exit cost was recognized at the date of an entity’s commitment to an exit plan. The provisions of this Statement are effective for exit or disposal activities that are initiated after December 31, 2002. The Company has adopted SFAS 146 for fiscal 2004 and the adoption of SFAS 146 did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated results of operations, financial position or cash flows.

In December 2002, the Emerging Issues Task Force (“EITF”) issued EITF Issue 00-21, “Accounting for Revenue Arrangements with Multiple Deliverables” (“EITF 00-21”). EITF 00-21 provides guidance to determine whether revenue arrangements contain multiple deliverable items and if so, requires that revenue be allocated amongst the different items based on fair value. EITF 00-21 also requires that revenue on any item in a revenue arrangement with multiple deliverables not delivered completely must be deferred until delivery of the items is completed. The guidance in EITF 00-21 is effective for revenue arrangements entered into in fiscal periods beginning after June 15, 2003. The adoption of EITF 00-21 did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated results of operations, financial position or cash flows.

In January 2003, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 46, “Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities” (“FIN 46”). FIN 46 requires an investor with a majority of the variable interests in a variable interest entity (“VIE”) to consolidate the entity and also requires majority and significant variable interest investors to provide certain disclosures. A VIE is an entity in which the equity investors do not have a controlling interest, or the equity investment at risk is insufficient to finance the entity’s activities without receiving additional subordinated financial support from the other parties. For arrangements entered into with VIEs created prior to January 31, 2003, the provisions of FIN 46 are required to be adopted at the beginning of the first interim or annual period beginning after December 15, 2003. The Company has determined that it does not have any investments or other interests in VIEs, therefore, there are no VIEs that would be consolidated. The provisions of FIN 46 are effective immediately for all arrangements entered into with new VIEs created after January 31, 2003. The Company has not invested in any new companies and does not have any variable interests in any entitites after January 31, 2003.

In May 2003, the FASB issued SFAS No. 150, “Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Characteristics of both Liability and Equity” (“SFAS 150”). This statement established standards for classifying and measuring liabilities of certain financial instruments that have the characteristics of both liabilities and equity. The provisions of this statement require that any financial instruments that are redeemed on a fixed or determinable date or upon an event certain to occur be classified as liabilities. This statement was effective immediately for instruments entered into or modified after May 31, 2003 and for all other instruments that exist as of the beginning of the first interim financial reporting period beginning after June 15, 2003. The Company adopted SFAS No. 150 during the three months ended September 28, 2003. The adoption of SFAS No. 150 did not have a material effect on the Company’s consolidated results of operations, financial position or cash flows.

Subsequent Event

On April 6, 2004, we announced the completion of our acquisition of the gallium nitride substrate and epitaxy business of ATMI, Inc. The acquisition will be accounted for under the purchase method of accounting. Under the terms of the agreement, we acquired the assets of the business including 17 U.S. patents and additional patent applications, fixed assets and inventory in exchange for $10,250,000 in cash. The excess of the fair market value over the purchase price of the assets will be allocated as a pro rata reduction to the value of the long-term assets in accordance with SFAS No. 141 “Business Combinations”.

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

 

Information set forth in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains various “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, (Securities Act), and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, (Exchange Act). All information contained in the following discussion relative to future markets for our products and trends in and anticipated levels of revenue, gross margins, and expenses, as well as other statements containing words such as “may,” “will,” “anticipate,” “target,” “plan,” “estimate,” “expect,” and “intend” and other similar expressions constitute forward-looking

statements. These forward-looking statements are subject to business, economic and other risks and uncertainties, both known and unknown, and actual results may differ materially from those contained in the forward-looking statements. We caution that such forward-looking statements are further qualified by important factors

Factors that could cause or contribute to such differences include: our actual operating resultsability to differ materially from those forward-looking statements. These factors include, but are not limited to, risks associated with our pending securitiescomplete development and other litigation,commercialization of products under development, such as the considerable management time and attention required and substantial expenses incurred regardlessour pipeline of its outcome, and the potential impact of an adverse result of the lawsuits filed against us and certain named executives and directors. In addition, the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) has requested that we provide information in responsebrighter light emitting diodes (LEDs); our ability to an informal inquiry. Furthermore, our actual operating results could differ materially due to a number of additional factors, includinglower costs; potential changes in demand; the risk that price stability, improved operational efficiencies, and the favorable product mix we have recently experienced will not continue; the risk that, due to the complexity of our manufacturing process,processes, we may experience production delays that preclude us from shipping sufficient quantities to meet customer orders or that result in higher production costs and lower margins; risks associated with the ramp-upramp up of our production for our new products; risks resulting from the concentration of our business among few customers, including the risk that customers may reduce or cancel orders or fail to honor purchase commitments,commitments; the rapid development of new technology and competing products that may impair demand or render our products obsolete; the potential lack of customer acceptance for our products; and the risks associated with our product supply chain .securities litigation. See Exhibit 99.1“Certain Business Risks and Uncertainties” below, as well as other risks and uncertainties referenced in this report, for further discussion ofadditional risk factors that could cause our actual results to differ.

Business Overview

 

Business Overview

We develop and manufacture compound semiconductor materials and electronic devices made from SiC, GaN, silicon carbide, or SiC, and Group III nitrides, or GaN.related compounds. The majority of our products are currently produced in our factory in Durham, North Carolina. We derive the largest portion of our revenue from the sale of blue, green and near ultraviolet or UV light emitting diodes or LEDs.LED chips. We currently offer LEDsLED chips at three brightness levels: high brightness blue and

high-brightness blue, traffic green, true green devices, which include MegaBright® and the X-class products; mid-brightness blue and green devices; and near UV products, which include our MegaBright®, XBright® and XThin® chips and our XB900 and XB500 power chip devices;

mid-brightness blue, traffic green and true green products, which include UltraBright® and SuperBright devices; and

standard brightness blue products.

 

Our LED deviceschips are packaged by our customers and used by manufacturers as a lighting source for mobile appliances such as cell phones, automotive dashboard lighting, indicator lamps, miniature white lights, indoor and outdoor full color displays, and signs, traffic signals and other lighting applications. Some of our customers package our blue LEDs with a phosphor coating to create white LEDs. In July 2004, we released a family of new high power packaged LEDs called our XLamp products, that are designed to compete with conventional lighting technology for certain specialty lighting applications. We currently are marketing these products for use in architectural lighting, appliance lighting, channel letters and reading lamps and target that future versions of XLamp will be used in emerging applications such as automotive headlamps and backlighting for large format liquid crystal display (LCD) screens. LED products represented 80%82% and 78%76% of our revenue for the three and nine months ended MarchSeptember 26, 2004 and September 28, 2004, respectively. LED products represented 76% and 74% of our revenue for the three and nine months ended March 30, 2003, respectively.

We also derive revenue from the sale of semiconductor wafers and epitaxy products made from SiC and GaN materials products. We sell semiconductor wafers made from SiC that our customers use for manufacturing LEDs and power

devices or for research and development. Sales of SiC and GaN wafer and epitaxy products represented 6%7% and 8% of our revenue for the three and nine months ended MarchSeptember 26, 2004 and September 28, 2004, respectively. Sales of SiC wafer products represented 8% of our revenue for the three and nine months ended March 30, 2003, respectively. We also sell SiC materials in bulk crystal form for use in gemstones to Charles & Colvard, Ltd. (“C&C”).(C&C) for use in gemstones. Sales of SiC crystals for gemstones represented 2% of our revenue for each of the threethree-month periods ended September 26, 2004 and nine months ended MarchSeptember 28, 2004, respectively. Sales of SiC crystals for gemstones represented 3% and 4% of our revenue for the three and nine months ended March 30, 2003, respectively. Our other products include SiC-based power and radio frequency, or RF devices. We received 2% and 1% of totalour revenue from sales of power devices and SiC-based RF devices combined for the three and nine months ended MarchSeptember 26, 2004 and September 28, 2004, respectively. We received 1% of total revenue from sales of power devices and SiC-based RF devices combined for the three and nine months ended March 30, 2003, respectively.

 

Through our Cree Microwave segment, based in Sunnyvale, California, we also develop and manufacture RF power transistors and modules using silicon technologies. These RF power transistors are a key semiconductor component for power amplifiers that are used in base stations for wireless networks. Wetechnology. During the three months ended September 26, 2004 and September 28, 2003, we received 3%1% and 2% of totalour revenue from sales from theour Cree Microwave segment, for the three and nine months ended March 28, 2004, respectively. We received 1% of total revenue from sales from the Cree Microwave segment for the three and nine months ended March 30, 2003, respectively.

 

The balance of our revenue was derived primarily from contract research funding under government contracts, which amounted to 7%6% and 9%11% for the three and nine months ended MarchSeptember 26, 2004 and September 28, 2004, respectively. For the three and nine months ended March 30, 2003, revenue from contract research funding was approximately 11% and 12%, respectively. Under various programs, U.S. Government entities and certain private entities assist us in the development of new technology by funding our research and development efforts. Contract revenue includes funding for direct research and development costs and a portion of our general and administrative expenses and other operating expenses for contracts under which we expect funding to exceed direct costs over the life of the contract. For contracts under which we anticipate that direct costs will exceed amounts to be funded over the life of the contract, we report direct costs as research and development expenses with related reimbursements recorded as an offset to those expenses. For the three and nine months ended March 28,September 26, 2004 and March 30,September 28, 2003, respectively, we did not have any contracts for which we anticipated direct costs to exceed funding over the life of the contract.

 

Product Overview

 

Our LED revenue and units sold increased 36%56% and 62%51%, respectively, in the thirdfirst quarter of fiscal 20042005 over the prior year comparative period of the prior year.period. Overall, we experienced sequentialcontinued to experience revenue growth in our standard, midmid-brightness, high-brightness and high brightnesspower packaged LEDs. Our most significant increase in product categories fromsales was in our high-brightness LED chips, which was driven by success in a combination of LED applications, including white keypads and LCD backlights in mobile phones, automotive, display and gaming products. Sales of high-brightness LEDs represented 55% of our LED revenue for the second to the thirdfirst quarter of fiscal 2004. X-class2005. Sales of mid-brightness products were the fastest growing partmade up 39% of our high brightness segment, while salesLED revenue in the first quarter of mid-brightness chips forfiscal 2005. During the blue keypad backlight market also increased over the prior sequential quarter. Based on feedback from our customers, the increase in salesfirst quarter of our X-class chips was driven by white LED applications, with success in mobile phones for white keypads, camera flashes and LCD backlights for several major phone manufacturers. In addition, thefiscal 2005, we experienced growth in this product category also benefited from new Japanese automotive designs and LED display signs. We continue to see strong demand for our high brightness products that are being used by our customers to make white LEDs for LCD backlights, camera flashes, keypad backlights, solid state illumination, outdoor displays and automotive dashboards.

During the third quarter of fiscal 2004, we continued to work with our customers to develop and expand our X-class products for specific markets and packaging appliances. The X-class of LED products include XBrightRazerThin® blue and green, XBright® Plus blue and XThin® blue and green. The X-class LED technology incorporates a junction down design and utilizes the optical benefits of SiC, while maintaining the advantages of our vertical structure with a single top contact. This design allows for a standard size chip similar to our other LED devices, but has presented packaging challenges for our customers. Our customers began having more success during the third quarter of fiscal 2004. As a result, our X-class products represented almost 20% of our fiscal 2004 third quarter LED revenue versus 2% in the second quarter of fiscal 2004. During the second quarter of fiscal 2004, we introduced our brighter XT-15 and XT-18 chips. During the third quarter of fiscal 2004, we extended our LED brightness capabilities with the development of our XT-21 chip that we have recently started shipping to several of our major customers in sample quantities. We target increased business for our high brightness products for the fourth quarter of fiscal 2004.

For the high volume, price sensitive keypad market, we target to release the UT230 deviceLED products, which are thinner and offer a lower voltage for use in our fourth quartera variety of fiscal 2004. Shipmentsapplications including blue keypads for mobile phones. Sales of our standard brightness devices remained stable inproducts made up 6% of our LED sales during the thirdfirst quarter of fiscal 2005.

We are focused on expanding our high-brightness product family with brighter products to enable us to increase use of our products for mobile appliance LCD backlight applications, which our customers have identified as a growth opportunity. Recently, we released our XT24-Investment chip and have started to sample customers with our XT27-Investment chip for white LCD backlights and

other high performance applications. We target other markets for our high-brightness LED applications, such as specialty lighting, displays, automotive, gaming and other applications, to continue to grow in fiscal 2005.

During the first quarter of fiscal 2005, we began the conversion of our LED production process from two-inch to three-inch SiC wafers. As we exited the first quarter, approximately 10% of our LED production was manufactured on three-inch wafers. As a result of the targeted cost savings from the three-inch migration and other benefits, we aim to implement a more aggressive pricing strategy to drive additional market share for our products.

In the first quarter of fiscal 2005, we released our XLamp 7090 series, which were the first products in our high power packaged LED family. In October of 2004, due towe announced the release of the XLamp 4550 series for smaller form factor applications. The XLamp products are being designed into several specialty lighting applications including architectural lighting, appliance lighting and channel letters. As automotive headlight and indicator light designs from a number of customers. In order to reduce our overall costs, we have undertaken an initiative to convertlarge screen LED applications emerge over the next year many ofseveral years, we target to position our XLamp products to be produced from 3-inch wafers. During the third quarter of fiscal 2004, our standard brightness, mid-brightness and high brightness parts made up 7%, 42% and 51% of our LED revenue, respectively.serve these markets as well.

 

During the three months ended March 28,September 26, 2004, SiC and GaN materials revenue decreased 5%increased 25% over the prior year comparative period due to a 33% decreasesignificant increase in the number of wafers sold. The lower volume resulted from reduced sales of epitaxal wafers, with SiC or GaN epitaxy for research customers and other changes in customer and product mix.which carry higher average selling prices. Revenue from salessale of SiC materials for useused in gemstones was 45% lower15% greater in the thirdfirst quarter of fiscal 20042005 as compared to the prior year period due to reduced demand and lowerimproved yields.

Revenue from silicon-based microwave products increased 238%38% in the thirdfirst quarter of fiscal 20042005 as compared to the prior year period. During the third quarter of fiscal 2004, we realized growth in both our Bi-polar and Laterally Diffused Metal Oxide Semiconductors (“LDMOS”) products. Much of the new business was derived from new customers, including the military and aeronautics markets. We received 2% and 1% of total revenue from sales of power devices and SiC-based RF devices combined for the three and nine months ended March 28, 2004, respectively. We received 1% of total revenue from sales of power devices and SiC-based RF devices combined for the three and nine months ended March 30, 2003, respectively. Government contract revenue decreased 11% for the three months ended March 28, 2004 over the prior year period as we experienced growth in sales of our Laterally Diffused Metal Oxide Semiconductors (LDMOS).

Contract revenue decreased 19% for the three months ended September 26, 2004 over the prior year period due largely to a shift to more cost share programs whereslow down of spending on contracts nearing completion. The first quarter of fiscal 2004 included $529,000 of additional funding on a formerly completed contract line item. In the first quarter of fiscal 2005, we absorbalso recorded a greater portion$337,000 license fee from a third party for the use of the overall cost.

certain technology owned by us but not part of our core technology.

Critical Accounting Policies

 

The following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations is based upon our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with U.S. accounting principles generally accepted in the United States.principles. In preparing our financial statements, we must make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of our financial statements. Critical accounting policies include those policies that are reflective of significant judgments and uncertainties, which potentially could produce materially different results under different assumptions and conditions. We believe that our critical accounting policies are limited to those described below.

 

The following listing is not intended to be a comprehensive list of all of our accounting policies. In many cases, the accounting treatment of a particular transaction is specifically dictated by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, with no need for management’s judgment in its application. There are also areas in which management’s judgment in selecting any available alternative would not produce a materially different result. See our audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 29, 2003 which contained a discussion of our accounting policies and other disclosures required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States.

Valuation of Long-Lived Assets, Intangible Assets and Goodwill. We have approximately $356.5$428.6 million of long-lived assets as of March 28,September 26, 2004, including approximately $272.0$314.4 million related to fixed assets and capitalized patents, $61.6$76.9 million in long termlong-term investments held to maturity, $33.2 million in long-term marketable securities available for sale and $23.0$4.1 million of other long-term assets. Long-termlong term assets, includeincluding net investments in privately held companies of $15.6$2.9 million and deferred taxes

long-term deposits of $7.0$1.2 million. In addition to the original cost of these assets, ourtheir recorded value of these assets is impacted by a number of management estimates that are determined based on our judgment, including estimated useful lives and salvage values. In accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”)(SFAS) No. 144, “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to Be Disposed of,” or SFAS 144,Assets”, we record impairment charges on long-lived assets used in operations when events and circumstances indicate that the assets have been impaired. In making these determinations, we utilize certain assumptions, including, but not limited to: (i) estimations of the fair market value of the assets, and (ii) estimations of future cash flows expected to be generated by these assets, which are based on additional assumptions such as asset utilization, length of service the asset will be used in our operations and estimated salvage values.

During For the second and third quarters of fiscalthree months ended September 26, 2004, Cree Microwave identifiedwe recorded impairment charges equal to $78,000 for certain equipment that was written off because the Company determined the equipment would not be usedwe identified as obsolete and it was unable to sell the equipment to a third party. The total amountdisposed of the write-down was $173,000.and for patents that we abandoned.

 

Based on estimations of the fair market value ofWe also review our Cree Microwave assets,capitalized patent portfolio and estimations of future cash flows, we determined that the estimated undiscounted cash flow exceeded the amount of the book value of the other long-term tangible assets for the business. As a result,record impairment charges when circumstances warrant, such as when issued patents have been abandoned or patent applications are no other Cree Microwave assets were impaired or written down during the first nine months of fiscal 2004 other than the assets described above.

longer being pursued.

Accounting for Marketable and Non-Marketable Equity Securities. From time to time, we evaluate strategic opportunities and potential investments in complementary businesses and as a result may invest in marketable equity securities. At March 28, 2004, we held no marketable equity securities. We classify marketable securities that are not trading or “held-to-maturity” securities as “available-for-sale”. We carry investments at fair value, based on quoted market prices, and unrealized gains and losses, net of taxes, are included in accumulated other comprehensive income, which is reflected as a separate component of shareholders’ equity. Realized gains and losses are recognized when realized upon sale or disposition. Declines in value that are deemed to be other than temporary in accordance with SFAS 115, “Accounting for Certain Debt and Equity Securities” are also recorded in the statement of operations. We have a policy in place to review our equity investments on a quarterly basis to evaluate whether or not each security has experienced an “other-than-temporary” decline in fair value. Our policy requires, among other things, a review of each company’s cash position, stock price performance, liquidity, ability to raise capital and management and ownership changes. Based on this review, if we believe that an “other-than-temporary” decline exists in the value of one of our marketable securities, it is our policy to write down these impaired investments to the market value. In addition, we generally record a write-down for investments in publicly held companies for an “other than temporary” impairment any time the market price of the security has remained below our average cost for two consecutive fiscal quarters, unless strong positive evidence exists that makes it clear that an “other-than-temporary” write-down would be inappropriate under the guidance of SFAS 115. The related write-down will then be recorded as an investment loss on our consolidated statements of income.

We also make strategic investments in the equity securities of privately held companies from time to time.companies. Since we do not have the ability to exercise significant influence over the operations of these companies, these investment balances are carried at cost and accounted for using the cost method of accounting. The shares of stock we received in these investments are not presently publicly traded and there is no other established market value for these securities. We have a policy in place to reviewestimate the fair value of these investments on a quarterlyregular basis in order to evaluate the carrying value of such investments. This policy includes, but is not limited to, reviewing each company’s cash position, estimates of the companies’ cash position,company’s market capitalization based on recent financing needs,transactions, its earnings and revenue outlook, operational performance, and management or ownership changes.changes and competition. The evaluation process is based on information that we are provided by thesethe privately held companies. Since these companies are not subject to the same disclosure regulations as U.S. public companies, the basis for these evaluations is subject to the timing and the accuracy of the data received from these companies. If the carrying value of an investment is atdetermined to be an amount in excess of our estimate of fair value, and we have determined that the decline is “other-than-temporary,”other-than-temporary, it is our policy to record a write-down of the investment. This write-down is estimated based on the information described above, and it is recorded as an investment loss on our consolidated statements of income. Estimating the fair value of non-marketable investments in early-stage technology companies is inherently subjective and may contribute to significant volatility in our reported results of operations. There were no adjustments made to our investments in privately held company investmentsinvestment losses on our consolidated statements of income during the three and nine months ended MarchSeptember 26, 2004 and September 28, 2004.2003 relating to our investments in privately held companies.

 

DuringFrom time to time, we evaluate strategic opportunities and potential investments in complementary businesses, and as a result we may invest in marketable equity securities. We classify marketable securities that are not trading or held-to-maturity securities as available-for-sale. We carry these investments at fair value, based on quoted market prices, and unrealized gains and losses, net of taxes, are included in accumulated other comprehensive income, which is reflected as a separate component of shareholders’ equity on the second quarterconsolidated balance sheets.

Realized gains and losses are recognized when realized upon sale or disposition. Declines in value that are deemed to be other-than-temporary in accordance with SFAS No. 115, “Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities” (SFAS 115), are recorded as an investment loss on our consolidated statements of income. We have a policy in place to review our equity holdings on a periodic basis to evaluate whether or not each security has experienced an other-than-temporary decline in fair value. Our policy requires, among other things, a review of each company’s cash position, stock price performance, liquidity, ability to raise capital and any management changes. Based on this review, if we believe that an other-than-temporary decline exists in the value of one of our marketable equity securities, it is our policy to write-down these equity investments to the market value. In addition, we record a write-down for investments in publicly held companies for an other-than-temporary impairment any time the market price of the security has remained below our average cost for two consecutive fiscal quarters, unless strong positive evidence exists that makes it clear that an other-than-temporary write-down would be inappropriate under the guidance of SFAS 115. Any related write-down would then be recorded as an investment loss on our consolidated statements of income.

As of June 27, 2004, we began accounting for our investment in the common stock of Color Kinetics as a marketable security that is available-for-sale under SFAS 115. Our investment in Color Kinetics is valued at $33.2 million, which represents the $12.7 million cost, plus a $20.5 million unrealized gain in the security based on the closing share price on September 24, 2004. As an available-for-sale security, any unrealized gain or loss is accounted for as a comprehensive income item in the equity section of the consolidated balance sheet and on the consolidated statement of shareholders’ equity and is not recorded through earnings. At September 28, 2003, we sold our entire position in two publicly traded companies. We sold 356,000 common shares in the first company for $1,826,000, with a net loss on the sale recognized for $36,000 during the second quarter of fiscal 2003. We also sold 691,000 common shares in the second publicly traded company for $2,115,000, with a net loss on the sale recognized for $2,031,000 during the second quarter of fiscal 2003.

held no marketable equity securities.

Inventories. Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market, cost being determined using the first-in, first-out method for finished goods and work in processwork-in-progress accounts and using the average cost method for raw materials for the Cree segment. The Cree Microwave segment uses a standard cost method to value its inventory.inventory costing method. We evaluate our ending inventories for excess quantities, impairment of value and obsolescence.obsolescence on a monthly basis. This evaluation includes analysis of sales levels by product and projections of future demand based upon input received from our customers, sales team and management estimates. We reserve for inventories on hand that are greater than twelve months old, unless there is an identified need for the inventory. In addition, we write off inventories that are considered obsolete based upon changes in customer demand, manufacturing process changes that result in existing inventory obsolescence or new product introductions, which eliminate demand for existing products. Remaining inventory balances are adjusted to approximate the lower of our manufacturing cost or market value. If future demand or market conditions are less favorable than our estimates, additional inventory write-downs may be required and would increase cost of revenue in the period the revision is made. We evaluate the adequacy of these reserves quarterly.

 

During the three months ended March 28,first quarter of fiscal 2004, we increased our reserve for certain raw materialwrote down LED inventory by $531,000 to an estimated market value calculation. Some of these products by $28,000. Duringwere subsequently sold during the nine months ended March 28, 2004, wesame quarter. We also reduced our reserve for certain wafer material products by $175,000, due to fluctuations in demand for certain products. During the nine months ended March 28, 2004, Cree Microwave scrapped $672,000 of$165,000 as products previously reserved products. We reduced the respective inventory reserves accordingly as of March 28, 2004.

As a result of the termination of the supply agreement with Spectrian in the second quarter of fiscal 2003, Cree Microwave recorded a $1.3 million reserve for inventory that was slow moving or specifically identified to be sold to Spectrian, including customized parts. We also reserved an additional $522,000 at Cree Microwave during the first quarter of fiscal 2003. This inventory charge was taken because of a change in demand from Spectrian. Spectrian initially indicated that it would have strong demand for this type of transistor, but later determined that the demand had significantly weakened. During the three months ended December 29, 2002, we reserved $784,000 in the Cree segment for slow moving LED and wafer inventory. In addition, during the first quarter of fiscal 2003, we wrote down $185,000 of certain LEDs to an estimated market value calculation. All these adjustments were recorded through cost of revenue.

In addition, we wrote off $1.0 million of costs associated with initial XBright products and $417,000 of costs associated with LDMOS8 devices as research and development expenses in the first quarter of fiscal 2003. The $1.0 million write-down was attributable to early generation XBright devices that were later determined to be non-saleable because of design deficiencies. The $417,000 write-down was associated with LDMOS8 products on hand that we determined not to be saleable for similar reasons. In both cases, our customers had initially accepted the devices and we produced initial amounts of the product. Based on history with our customers, once products are accepted, they are ultimately qualified. Thus we concluded that capitalizing the cost of these items as inventory was appropriate. However, in both cases, our customers later rejected the products. Therefore, we wrote off the entire amount of inventory as research and development expenses, because the materials never qualified as completed devices or ultimately sold to customers. In the case of the LED devices, our customers returned all products shipped of that technology.selling more rapidly than anticipated.

Revenue Recognition and Accounts Receivable. Revenue on product sales is recognized when persuasive evidence of a contract exists, such as when a purchase order or contract is received from the customer, the price is fixed, title of the goods has transferred and there is a reasonable assurance of collection of the sales proceeds. We obtain written purchase authorizations from our customers for a specified amount of product at a specified price and consider delivery to have occurred at the time of shipment. The majority of our products have shipping terms that are FOBfree on board (FOB) or FCAfree carrier alongside (FCA) shipping point, which means that we fulfill the obligation to deliver when the goods are handed over and into the charge of the carrier at itsour shipping dock. This means that the buyer bears all costs and risks of loss or damage to the goods from that point. The difference between FOB and FCA is that under FCA terms, the customer designates a shipping carrier of choice to be used. In certain cases, we ship our product CIF.products cost insurance freight (CIF). Under this arrangement, revenue is recognized under FOB shipping point terms;terms, however, we are responsible for the cost of insurance during shipmentto transport the product as well as the cost to ship the product. For all of our sales other than those with CIF terms, we invoice our customers only for shipping costs necessary to physically move the product from our place of business to the customer’s location. The costs primarily consist of overnight shipping charges. We incur the direct shipping costs on behalf of the customer and invoice the customer to obtain direct reimbursement for such costs. We account for our shipping costs by recording the amount of freight that is invoiced to our customers as revenue, with the corresponding cost recorded as cost of revenue. For the threethree-month periods ended September 26, 2004 and nine months ended MarchSeptember 28, 2004, amounts2003, we recognized $42,000 and $26,000, respectively, as revenue for shipping and handling costs were $27,400 and $79,500, respectively. In fiscal 2003, shipping costs were not material and we accounted for such costs as a cost of revenue with the reimbursement of these costs reflected as a direct offset and reduction of cost of revenue.costs. If inventory is maintained at a consigned location, revenue is recognized when our customer pulls product for its use.use and the title of the goods is transferred to the customer. We provide our customers with limited rights of return for non-conforming shipments and warranty claims. We accrue estimated warranty expense as a cost of revenue.claims for up to 36 months for Cree Microwave products and for lesser periods for Cree products. We record a reserve for estimated sales returns, which is reflected as a reduction of revenue at the time of revenue recognition.

Certain of our customersales arrangements provide for limited product exchanges and reimbursement of certain sales costs. For two customers, with these arrangements,Sumitomo and OSRAM, we defer revenue equal to the levellevels specified in these contractual arrangements and recognize the related revenue less any claims made against the reserves when the customer’s exchange rights expire and the deferred revenue reserves are released. The reserve expires no later than two quarters from the date of the original sale. In connection with our distributorsales agreement with Sumitomo, such deferred revenue amounted to $6.5$6.6 million and $5.3$7.9 million as of March 28,September 26, 2004 and June 29, 2003,27, 2004, respectively. In connection with our purchase agreement with Osram,OSRAM, such deferred revenue amounted to $365,000$531,000 and $0$471,000 as of March 28,September 26, 2004 and June 29, 2003,27, 2004, respectively.

 

Historically, we have experienced only nominal credit losses from customers’ inability to pay. Our accounts receivable reserveAny uncollectibility of receivables is primarily due to returned products. Therefore, we record an allowance for sales returns at the time of sale. Significant judgments and estimates made by management are used in connection with establishing the allowance for sales returns. Material differences may result in the actual amount and timing of our revenue for any period in which management made different judgments or utilized different estimates. The allowance for sales returns at March 28,September 26, 2004 and June 29, 200327, 2004 was $824,000$737,000 and $644,000,$798,000, respectively.

Revenue from government contracts and certain private agenciesentities is recorded on the proportional performance method as contract expenses are incurred. Contract revenue represents contracts withreimbursement by various U.S. Government entities and certain private entitiesother parties to perform research and development work related toaid in the development of our technologies.new technology. The applicable contracts generally provide that we may elect to retain ownership of inventions made in performing the work, subject to a non-exclusive license retained by the government to practice the inventions for government purposes. The contract funding may be based on either a cost-plus or a cost-share arrangement. The amount of funding under each contract is determined based on cost estimates that include direct costs, plus an allocation for research and development, general and administrative and the cost of capital expenses. Cost-plus funding is determined based on actual costs plus a set percentage margin. For the cost-share contracts, the actual costs relating to the activities to be performed by us under the contract are divided between the U.S. Government and us based on the terms of the contract. The applicablegovernment’s cost share is then paid to us. Activities performed under these arrangements include research regarding SiC and GaN materials and devices. The contracts generally providetypically require the submission of a written report that documents the results of such research, as well as some material deliverables.

The revenue and expense classification for contract activities is based on the nature of the contract. For contracts where we may elect to retain ownership of inventions made in performing the work, subject to a non-exclusive license retained by the government oranticipate that funding entity to practice the inventions for limited purposes. Contract revenue includes funding of direct research and development costs and a portion of our general and administrative expenses and other operating expenses for contracts under which funding is expected towill exceed direct costs over the life of the contract. The specific reimbursement provisionscontract, funding is reported as contract revenue and all direct costs are reported as costs of the contracts, including the portion of our general and administrative expenses and other reimbursable operating expenses vary by contract. Such reimbursements are recorded as contract revenue. For contracts under which we anticipate that direct costs of the activities subject to the contract will exceed amounts to be funded over the life of the contract, (i.e., certain cost share arrangements), we report direct costs are reported as research and development expenses withand related reimbursements recordedfunding is reported as an offset toof those expenses.

 

Accruals for Liabilities and Warranties.We make estimates for the amount of costs that have been incurred but not yet billed for general services, including legal and accounting fees, costs pertaining to our self-funded medical insurance, warranty costs and other expenses. Many of these expenses are estimated based on historical experience or information gained directly from the service providers. During the third quarter of fiscal 2004, we reduced our overall warranty cost reserve by $26,000. For the first nine months of fiscal 2004, we increased our overall warranty cost reserve by $371,000.

 

Valuation of Deferred Tax Assets.Assets and Liabilities.As of March 28,September 26, 2004, we had $8.9$2.6 million recorded as a short orshort-term deferred tax asset and $8.3 million as a long-term deferred tax asset.liability. This asset was recorded as a result of a tax benefitbenefits associated with the $143.9 million of significant charges taken in fiscal 2002. These charges werewrite-downs and reserves recorded for accounts receivable and inventory reserves that are deferred for tax purposes. The liability provides for amounts due as a result of the write-off of propertytiming difference for depreciation between book and equipment, the impairment oftax purposes being offset by deferred tax benefits associated with write-downs taken for goodwill and other intangible assets, at Cree Microwave and other charges resulting from the downturn in Cree Microwave’s business and the “other-than-temporary”other-than-temporary charges taken on our investments.investments and other write-downs taken in prior years. We have a reserve for taxes that may become payable in the future included in deferred tax liabilities. A valuation allowance has been established on capital loss carryforwards and unrealized losses on certain securities as we believe that it is more likely than not that the tax benefits of the items will not be realized.

It is our policy to establish reserves for taxes that may become payable in future years, and we currently have a reserve of $8.5 million for such deferred tax liabilities. We establish the reserves based upon management’s assessment of exposure associated with the tax return deduction. We analyze the tax reserves at least annually and make adjustments as events occur that warrant adjustment to the reserve. For example, if the statutory period for assessing tax on a given tax return lapses, we reduce the reserve associated with that period. Similarly, if tax

authorities provide administrative guidance or a decision is rendered in the courts, we make appropriate adjustments to our tax reserve. The tax reserve was unchanged in the three month period ended September 26, 2004.

The above listing is not intended to be a comprehensive list of all of our accounting policies. In many cases, the accounting treatment of a particular transaction is specifically dictated by generally accepted accounting principles, with no need for management’s judgment in its application. There are also areas in which management’s judgment in selecting any available alternative would not produce a materially different result. See our audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 27, 2004, which contained a discussion of our accounting policies and other disclosures required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States.

Results of Operations

 

The following table shows our consolidated statements of income data expressed as a percentage of total revenue for the periods indicated:

 

  Three Months Ended

 Nine Months Ended

 
  March 28,
2004


 March 30,
2003


 March 28,
2004


 March 30,
2003


   Three Months
Ended
September 26,
2004


 Three Months
Ended
September 28,
2003


 

Revenue:

      

Product revenue, net

  92.6% 89.3% 91.3% 87.6%  94.0% 89.4%

Contract revenue, net

  7.4  10.7  8.7  12.4   6.0  10.6 
  

 

 

 

  

 

Total revenue

  100.0  100.0  100.0  100.0   100.0  100.0 

Cost of revenue:

   

Product revenue

  43.1  44.9  45.8  48.0 

Contract revenue

  6.5  8.5  7.5  9.6 

Cost of Revenue:

   

Product revenue, net

  39.6  49.1 

Contract revenue, net

  4.4  8.3 
  

 

 

 

  

 

Total cost of revenue

  49.6  53.4  53.3  57.6   44.0  57.4 
  

 

 

 

  

 

Gross margin

  50.4  46.6  46.7  42.4   56.0  42.6 

Operating expenses:

      

Research and development

  13.7  13.5  12.6  13.5   11.5  12.6 

Sales, general and administrative

  10.2  11.2  10.9  12.7   8.0  11.9 

Other expense

  0.1  —    0.1  1.1   0.1  —   

Gain on termination of supply agreement

  —    —    —    3.0 
  

 

 

 

  

 

Income from operations

  26.4  21.9  23.1  18.1   36.4  18.1 

Non-operating income:

   

(Loss) on investments in marketable securities

  —    —    —    (1.2)

Other non-operating income

  0.8  —    0.4  —   

Interest income

  1.2  2.0  1.3  2.3 

Gain on investments in marketable securities

  0.1  —   

Interest income, net

  1.2  1.3 
  

 

 

 

  

 

Income before income taxes

  28.4  23.9  24.8  19.2   37.7  19.4 

Income tax expense

  8.8  6.2  7.7  5.0   12.2  6.0 
  

 

 

 

  

 

Net income

  19.6% 17.7% 17.1% 14.2%  25.5% 13.4%
  

 

Three Months Ended March 28,September 26, 2004 and March 30,September 28, 2003

 

Revenue. Revenue increased 28%45% to $77.1$95.9 million in the thirdfirst quarter of fiscal 20042005 from $60.2$66.2 million in the thirdfirst quarter of fiscal 2003.2004. Higher revenue was primarily attributable to greater product revenue, which increased 33%52% to $71.4$90.2 million in the thirdfirst quarter of fiscal 20042005 from $53.8$59.2 million in the thirdfirst quarter of fiscal 2003.2004. Much of the increase in revenue resulted from increasedsignificantly higher unit shipments of our LED products, duewhich increased 51% in the first quarter of fiscal 2005 as compared to the prior year period. The greater LED shipments resulted from stronger demand from our customers primarily for a variety of applications, including mobile appliance applications.phones. LED revenue was $62.0$78.9 million and $45.7$50.6 million, for the thirdfirst quarter of fiscal 2005 and 2004, and 2003, respectively. OurThe most significant increase in LED revenue in the thirdfirst quarter of fiscal 20042005 came from sales to our Japanese distributor, Sumitomo and Agilent Technologies (Malaysia) Sdn Bhd, or Agilent. Revenue from sales to Sumitomo and Agilent combined, increased by 72%,as a result of strong end customer demand in the third quarter of fiscal 2004 as compared to the third quarter of fiscal 2003 due to strong demand among Asian manufacturers for our products for mobile appliance, automotive, gaming, consumer products and indicator light applications. The distributorship agreement with Sumitomo requires us to establish reserves at the time we ship LED products to Sumitomo based upon a percentage of the total purchase price of such products. Our contract with Osram also requires us to establish a reserve at the time we ship LED products to them. We defer revenue on shipments made to Sumitomo for sales costs they incur in selling our products, and for costs to manage our inventory. We defer revenue onJapan.

shipments made to Osram for potential costs that they may incur in using our products. Deferred revenue under these contracts amounted to $6.9 million and $5.5 million as of March 28, 2004 and June 29, 2003, respectively.

 

Our LED revenue increased 36%56% in the thirdfirst quarter of fiscal 2005 as compared to the first quarter of fiscal 2004 as compared to the third quarter of fiscal 2003 and made up 80%82% of our total revenue for the 2004 quarter. Our blended average LED sales price declined 16% in the third quarter of fiscal 2004increased 3% as compared to the thirdfirst quarter of fiscal 2003.2004. This decreaseincrease was in line with our strategy to lower pricesprimarily due to our customers to expand applications using nitride LEDs. Ourpurchasing more of our high-brightness products, which offer a higher average sales priceprice. Our high-brightness product sales were 55% and 45% of LED revenues for the three months ended September 26, 2004 and September 28, 2003, respectively. Sales of high-brightness products were driven by demand for LEDs also was lower due to increasing price competitivenessin white keypad applications, LCD backlights for cell phones, display, automotive and gaming applications.

Sales of our mid-brightness LED products grew in the marketplace and a change in the product mix of our sales to customers. For the thirdfirst quarter of fiscal 2004,2005 as our LED chip volumenew thinner and lower voltage chips increased 62% over shipmentspenetration into the markets for keypads for mobile phones and other applications. Shipments of our standard brightness products were also up slightly in the prior year period. While revenue increased across all of our LED product categories, our high brightness LED products grew faster in the thirdfirst quarter of fiscal 2004 compared2005 in comparison to the prior year period than our other products. Our high brightness products grew as a result ofand were used in automotive and indicator light applications. For the introduction of several new products in our X-class product line as well as further design wins for our MegaBright devices. Our MegaBright and X-class product lines have been incorporated into several new mobile phone designs in the keypads that feature a blue color as well as blue LEDs that are used to make white light for keypads, color LCD screens and flash units. In addition, we have seen LED chips being used increasingly in other applications including new Asian automotive designs, displays, gaming equipment and office automation. Shipments of our mid brightness and standard brightness devices remained stable in the thirdsecond quarter of fiscal 2004 compared to the prior year comparative period and were supported by mobile appliance, automotive, displays and indicator light designs from a number of customers.

With the introduction of our new brighter XT family of products, we are targeting the XThin product family to continue to grow and be a significant part of our business, especially for use in white LEDs for mobile appliances. These products deliver increased brightness with the low forward voltage and thin design. For the high volume, price sensitive keypad market2005, we target the release ofthat our UT230 product in our fourth quarter. We believe that this product offers a low forward voltage and thin design at a low sales price that is targeted to compete with other Asianoverall LED manufacturers.

In the third quarter of fiscal 2004,revenue will be higher; however, our blended average sales price for LED products increased 3%will decline sequentially due to a near term mix shift to mid-brightness products as production ramps up for the UT-230 chip, which has an average sales price at the low end of our LED product range. We are also implementing a more favorable customer and product mix. We continue to evaluate and adjust ouraggressive pricing strategy to drive long-term demandtake advantage of our target cost reductions from the three-inch LED wafer conversion and other projects to increase our market shareadditional growth in future quarters.

SiC and respond to continued pricing pressure inGaN wafer and epitaxy revenue was $6.8 million and $5.4 million, for the market. At this time, we target lower average sales prices during the fourthfirst quarter of fiscal 2004 on a product-by-product basis. We also target increased sales during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2004 of our high brightness products. Based on these trends, we believe that our blended average sales price may be more influenced in the near term by our product mix.

SiC wafer revenue was $4.8 million2005 and $5.1 million for the third quarter of fiscal 2004, and 2003, respectively. Wafer revenue decreased 5%increased 25% over the prior year due to greater epitaxy wafer sales. As a result of this change in customer and product mix. Wafer units decreased 33% whilemix, the average sales price increased 42%35% during the thirdfirst quarter of fiscal 2004 over2005 as compared to the prior year period, due to changes in customer and product mix.period. Wafer revenue made up 6%7% of our total revenue in the thirdfirst quarter of fiscal 2004.

2005. SiC materialmaterials revenue from material sold for gemstone use was $1.2$1.5 million and $2.1$1.3 million, for the thirdfirst quarter of fiscal 20042005 and 2003,2004, respectively. Revenue from sales of our SiC materials for use in gemstones decreased 45%increased 15% during the thirdfirst quarter of fiscal 2004,2005 as compared to the prior year period due to reduced demand and lower yields. Materials sold for useimproved yields of usable materials in gemstones wereour production of gemstone material. Revenue from gemstone materials was 2% of our overall revenuetotal sales for the three months ended March 28, 2004.first quarter of fiscal 2005.

 

Revenue from Cree Microwave products was $2.2$1.4 million and $644,000$1.1 million, for the thirdfirst quarter of fiscal 20042005 and 2003,2004, respectively. Cree Microwave revenue made up 3%1% of our total revenue for the thirdfirst quarter of fiscal 2004.2005. Revenue from these products increased 238%38% in the third first

quarter of fiscal 20042005 over the comparable period in the prior yearof fiscal 2004 due to incremental orders from new customers for our newer LDMOS as well as bipolar and newer LDMOS device sales to Remec, Inc., or Remec. Cree Microwave had $918,000 in revenue from products sold to Remec in the third quarter of fiscal 2004, compared to $156,000 in revenue from products sold to Remec in the third quarter of fiscal 2003. This increase in revenue is due to Cree Microwave making available last-time buy parts to Remec prior to Cree Microwave discontinuing some of the older bipolar product lines and sales of our latest generation of LDMOS devices for new designs.

module devices. Product sales mix for Cree Microwave products changed as LDMOS and modules made up 50%68% and 45%41% of revenue for the thirdfirst quarter of fiscal 20042005 and fiscal 2003,2004, respectively. Revenue attributable to bipolar devices was 45%24% and 14%40% for the thirdfirst quarter of fiscal 20042005 and 2003,2004, respectively. Approximately 5%8% of Cree Microwave’s revenue was from engineering and other services for the thirdfirst quarter of fiscal 20042005 as compared to 41%19% for the thirdfirst quarter of fiscal 2003.2004. Overall, our average sales price for Cree Microwave was 11%31% lower in the third quarter of fiscal 2004 compared to the prior fiscal year period as engineering service revenue includes no corresponding unit sales, which increaseddue to these changes in the average salesproduct mix and annual price calculation for the third quarter ofdecreases. For fiscal 2003. For the remainder of fiscal 2004,2005, we target higher revenue for Cree Microwave. However, if we are unable to secure new design wins for Cree Microwave, revenue from this segment may decline and the valuation of our assets in this segment may be impaired. Sales for power semiconductors and SiC microwave devices were 2% of revenue for the three months ended March 28, 2004 compared to 1% of revenue for the three months ended March 30, 2003 due to the ramp of power schottky device sales for power supplies and other applications.

Contract revenue was 7%6% of total revenue for the thirdfirst quarter of fiscal 2004.2005. Contract revenue received from U.S. Government and certain private entities decreased 11%19% during the thirdfirst quarter of fiscal 20042005 compared to the same period of fiscal 2003 as we experienced2004 due to a shift to more cost share programs. We also recorded a $115,000 prior period rate adjustmentslow down of spending on contracts nearing completion. Additionally, in the thirdfirst quarter of fiscal 2004 which reduced revenue.we received $529,000 in funding for a contract that was completed in a prior period. During the first quarter of fiscal 2005, we received $337,000 from a third party for a license fee for certain technology that we own. This licensed technology is not part of our core technology employed to generate product sales.

 

Gross Profit. Gross profit increased 38%90.2% to $38.8$53.7 million in the thirdfirst quarter of fiscal 20042005 from $28.0$28.2 million in the prior year comparative period. Compared to the prior year period, gross margins increased from 47%43% to 50%56% of revenue inrevenue. The increase was driven by LED chips, where blended average selling prices were 3% higher and costs were reduced by 26% over the third quartersame period of fiscal 2004. During the first quarter for fiscal 2005, we benefited from a highly utilized factory, a number of productivity improvements, as well as a reduction in variable costs, which generated the cost decline. In the three months ended March 28, 2004, we decreased our allowance for sales returns by $146,000. In the thirdfirst quarter of fiscal 2004, gross profit included a $531,000 write down of LED inventory to market value that was partly offset by a $165,000 reduction in wafer inventory reserves. Our power, microwave and gemstone margins improved over the prior year period due to higher LED marginsall benefited from a combination of volume, yield and lower negative margins reported by the Cree Microwave segment. LED margins improved as our blended average sales price decreased by 16%, while the blended average cost of our LEDs decreased by 23% due to higher throughputproductivity improvements in the factory and improved yields. Because a significant portionfirst quarter of our factory cost is fixed, higher throughput typically results in lower costs per unit produced.fiscal 2005 compared to the same period last year.

Negative gross profits were $370,000$1.3 million for our Cree Microwave businesssegment during the thirdfirst quarter of fiscal 20042005 as compared to negative gross profits of $1.7 million recorded during the thirdfirst quarter of fiscal 2003.2004. Higher revenue resulting from sales to new customers and Remec last time buy programs combined with improved yield has positively impacted the financial results of this segment.

 

Our average wafer sales priceWafer costs for our SiC materials sales increased 42% while average wafer costs increased by 56%were 79% higher in the thirdfirst quarter of fiscal 20042005 compared to the third quarter of fiscal 2003, due to a shift in customer and product mix. Contract margins declined from 20% in the third quarter of fiscal 2003 to 12% in the thirdfirst quarter of fiscal 2004 due to the higher mix of epitaxy products and a higher percentage of cost share contracts being worked on during the year. We also$165,000 reduction in wafer inventory reserves recorded a $115,000 prior period rate adjustment in the thirdfirst quarter of fiscal 2004. Contract margins increased from 22% in the first quarter of fiscal 2004 which reduced revenue.to 25% in the first quarter of fiscal 2005 due to the recognition of $337,000 in contract revenue for the license fee. We target contract margins to be in a range of 10-15%approximately 20% for the remainder of the fiscal year.

As of the end of the first quarter of fiscal 2005, approximately 10% of our LED wafer production was manufactured from three-inch products. We target to convert the majority of our LED production to three-inch wafers by the end of fiscal year 2005.

 

Research and Development.Research and development expenses increased 29%32% in the thirdfirst quarter of fiscal 20042005 to $10.5$11.0 million from $8.1$8.3 million in the thirdfirst quarter of fiscal 2003.2004. The increase in research and development spending supported our high brightness LED programs, 3-inch process development and XLamp qualification. In addition, we funded development of our LDMOS, SiC and Group III nitride microwave devices, our power devices and our near UV lasers. We target research and development expenses to remain in a range of $10.0-$11.0 million in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2004.

Sales, General and Administrative. Sales, general and administrative expenses increased 18% in the third quarter of fiscal 2004 to $7.9 million from $6.7 million in the third quarter of fiscal 2003. The increased expenses in the third quarter of fiscal 2004 included expenses associated with the growth of our business, costs related to the class action litigation and related matters and Sarbanes-Oxley related compliance costs. These expenses also included a higher level of funding for our employee profit sharing program during the third quarter of fiscal 2004 than in the prior year comparative period.

Impairment of Property and Equipment. Impairment of property and equipment increased to $80,000 in the third quarter of fiscal 2004 as compared to $0 in the third quarter of fiscal 2003. During the third quarter of fiscal 2004, Cree Microwave took an additional $30,000 write-down of certain equipment that was written down in the second quarter of fiscal 2004 as we determined that the equipment could not be sold. Cree Microwave has written down a total of $173,000 for this equipment, which will now be scrapped. In addition, we also wrote down $50,000 of equipment in our Durham factory as the equipment was disposed of.

Other Non-Operating Income (Loss). Other non-operating income was $598,000 in the third quarter of fiscal 2004 as compared to a $29,000 loss in the third quarter of fiscal 2003. During the third quarter of fiscal 2004, we received a contractually agreed upon payment from one of our customers for a foreign currency translation adjustment and we recognized a gain for a one-time technology license fee.

Interest Income, net. Interest income, net decreased 21% to $942,000 in the third quarter of fiscal 2004 from $1.2 million in the third quarter of fiscal 2003. This reduction resulted primarily from lower interest rates available for our liquid cash and securities-held-to-maturity. Available cash increased to $241.0 million in the third quarter of fiscal 2004 from $189.0 million in the third quarter of fiscal 2003 due to higher profitability generated by the business and strong working capital management.

Income Tax Expense. Income tax expense for the third quarter of fiscal 2004 was $6.8 million compared to $3.7 million recorded in the third quarter of fiscal 2003. Our effective income tax rate was 31% for the third quarter of fiscal 2004 compared to a 26% rate during the comparative period in fiscal 2003 due to greater tax benefits in fiscal 2003 associated with the losses reported in fiscal 2002. During the third quarter of fiscal 2004, our operations also were more profitable than in the third quarter of fiscal 2003. At March 28, 2004, we maintained $8.9 million in deferred tax assets that we did not reserve for as we are targeting profitable operations over the next several periods and plan to use the assets in their entirety.

Nine Months Ended March 28, 2004 and March 30, 2003

Revenue. Revenue increased 30% to $216.0 million in the first nine months of fiscal 2004 from $165.8 million in the comparable period in fiscal 2003. Higher revenue was primarily attributable to greater product revenue, which increased 36% to $197.1 million in the first nine months of fiscal 2004 from $145.1 million in the comparable period in fiscal 2003. Much of the increase in revenue resulted from increased unit shipments of our LED products due to stronger demand from our customers, primarily for mobile appliance applications.

Our LED revenue represented 78% of total revenue for the first nine months of fiscal 2004. LED revenue increased 37% to $169.1 million from $123.4 million, for the first nine months of fiscal 2004 compared to the prior year. The increase in LED revenue was driven by a 68% increase in unit shipments that offset an 18% decrease in the blended average selling price between the periods. This decrease was in line with our strategy to lower prices to our customers to expand applications using nitride LEDs. Our average sales price for LEDs also was lower due to increasing price competitiveness in the marketplace and a change in the product mix of our sales to customers. The most significant increase in LED revenue in the first nine months of fiscal 2004 came from sales to our Japanese distributor, Sumitomo and Agilent. Revenue from sales to Sumitomo and Agilent combined, increased by 86% in the first nine months of fiscal 2004 as compared to the first nine months of fiscal 2003 due to strong demand among Asian manufacturers for our products for mobile appliance, automotive, gaming, consumer products and indicator light applications.

SiC wafer revenue was $16.3 million and $13.2 million, for the first nine months of fiscal 2004 and 2003, respectively. Wafer revenue increased 24% over the prior year period due to changes in customer and product mix during the first nine months of fiscal 2004. Wafer units increased 19% while the average sales price increased 4% during the first nine months of fiscal 2004 over the prior year period, due to the changes in customer and product mix. Wafer revenue made up 8% of our total revenue in the first nine months of fiscal 2004.

SiC material revenue from material sold for gemstone use was $3.5 million and $5.8 million, for the first nine months of fiscal 2004 and 2003, respectively. Revenue from sales of our SiC materials for use in gemstones decreased 40% during the nine months ended March 28, 2004 as compared to the prior year period due to reduced demand and lower yields. Materials sold for use in gemstones were 2% of our overall revenue for the nine months ended March 28, 2004.

Revenue from Cree Microwave products was $5.2 million and $2.1 million, for the first nine months of fiscal 2004 and 2003, respectively. Cree Microwave revenue made up 2% of our total revenue for the nine months ended March 28, 2004. Revenue from these products increased 148% in the first nine months of fiscal 2004 over the comparable period in the prior fiscal year due to incremental orders from new customers for our newer LDMOS and module devices. In addition, Cree Microwave earned $2.3 million in revenue from products sold to Remec in the first nine months of fiscal 2004, compared to $529,000 in revenue from products sold to Spectrian/Remec (which was purchased by Remec in December 2002) in the nine months ended March 30, 2003.

Product sales mix for Cree Microwave changed in the first nine months of fiscal 2004 compared to the first nine months of fiscal 2003 as sales of LDMOS and modules products made up 51% and 52% of revenue for the first nine months of fiscal 2004 and fiscal 2003, respectively. Revenue attributable to bipolar devices was 45% and 17% for the first nine months of fiscal 2004 and 2003, respectively. Approximately 4% of Cree Microwave’s revenue was attributed to engineering and other services for the nine months ended March 28, 2004 as compared to 31% for the prior year comparative period. Overall, our average sales price for Cree Microwave products was 20% lower in the first nine months of fiscal 2004 compared to the prior fiscal year period due to these changes in the product mix. Sales for power semiconductors and SiC microwave devices were 1% of revenue for the nine months ended March 28, 2004 compared to less than 1% of revenue for the nine months ended March 30, 2003.

Contract revenue was 9% of total revenue for the first nine months of fiscal 2004. Contract revenue received from U.S. Government and certain private entities decreased 8% during the first nine months of fiscal 2004 compared to the same period of fiscal 2003 as we experienced a shift to more cost share programs during fiscal 2004. During the first quarter of fiscal 2004, we recorded a $529,000 revenue adjustment for additional funding received from the government on an older contract; the expenses associated with that contract were incurred in a prior year. In addition, we also recorded a $115,000 prior period rate adjustment in the first nine months of fiscal 2004 that lowered our revenue.

Gross Profit. Gross profit increased 44% to $100.9 million in the first nine months of fiscal 2004 from $70.3 million in the prior year comparative period. Compared to the prior year period, we increased gross margin from 42% to 47% of revenue in the first nine months of fiscal 2004. In the first nine months of fiscal 2004, we increased our allowance for sales returns by $174,000 due to certain slower paying customers and business growth. During the nine months ended March 30, 2003, cost of sales included a $1.8 million inventory write-down at Cree Microwave due to the termination of the supply agreement with Spectrian and other slow moving products. We also recorded a $1.0 million increase to inventory reserves for LED and wafer products. In addition, reserves for our allowance for sales returns were increased by $380,000 during the first nine months of fiscal 2003. Gross margin for the first nine months of fiscal 2003 was most impacted by the low revenue reported at our Cree Microwave segment. Gross profit for the Cree Microwave segment was a loss of $2.9 million and $7.6 million for the first nine months of fiscal 2004 and 2003, respectively. LED margins improved as our blended average sales price decreased by 18%, in the first nine months of 2004 from the prior year period, while

the blended average cost of our LEDs decreased by 22% in the same time due to higher throughput in the factory and improved yields. Because a significant portion of our factory cost is fixed, higher throughput typically results in lower costs per unit produced.

Wafer costs for our SiC materials sales were 2% lower in the nine months ended March 28, 2004 than the prior year comparative period, due to a shift in mix and a $186,000 reduction in wafer inventory reserves. Contract margins declined from 23% in the first nine months of fiscal 2003 to 15% in the first nine months of fiscal 2004 due to a higher percentage of cost share contracts being worked on during the year. During the first quarter of fiscal 2004, we recorded a $529,000 revenue adjustment for additional funding received from the government on an older contract; the expenses associated with that contract were incurred in a prior year. In addition, we also recorded a $115,000 prior period rate adjustment in the first nine months of fiscal 2004 that lowered our revenue.

Research and Development.Research and development expenses increased 22% in the first nine months of fiscal 2004 to $27.2 million from $22.4 million in the first nine months of fiscal 2003. The increase in research and development spending supported our 3-inchthree-inch process development, our thin chip products, X-class and power chip LEDs, as well as our XLamp LED high power packaged LEDs

and other high brightness LED research programs. In addition, we funded ongoing development of our LDMOS, SiCfor higher power/higher linearity RF and Group III nitride microwave devices, our powernear UV laser devices and our near UV lasers. During the first quarter of fiscal 2003, we received $500,000 in research funding from an affiliate of Lighthouse Technologies, Inc. (“Lighthouse”), in which we hold a private company equity investment. When customers participate in funding our research and development programs, we record the amount funded as a reduction of research and development expenses. We do not expect any outside funding for research and development during fiscal 2004 at this time. Research and development costs for the nine months ended March 30, 2003 also included a $1.0 million charge for costs associated with initial XBright chips that were made in previous quarters and were never fully qualified by customers. We determined during the first quarter of fiscal 2003 that these parts were not commercially viable. In addition, $417,000 of research and development costs associated with LDMOS 8 development were also incurred.higher power diodes/switches.

 

Sales, General and Administrative.Administrative. Sales, general and administrative expenses increased 13%decreased 3% in the first nine monthsquarter of fiscal 2005 to $7.7 million from $7.9 million in the first quarter of fiscal 2004. The decreased expenses in the first quarter of fiscal 2005 were primarily related to decreased legal costs. The first quarter of fiscal 2004 to $23.7 million from $21.0included $1.8 million in the prior year comparative period, due to general expense increases associated with the growth of our business and a higher level of funding for our employee profit sharing program. Legal and other costs during the first nine months of fiscal 2004 were $113,000 lower when compared to the same period of fiscal 2003. In the first nine months of fiscal 2004, we incurred legal and other costsexpenses associated with the Hunter and class action litigation and costs forrelated matters, including the cost of an investigation by a special committee investigation conducted by theof our Board of Directors. These costssavings were not incurred in the first nine months of fiscal 2003. In fiscal 2003, our legal and other costs were higher due to the highpartly offset by rising costs associated with the Nichia litigation that was settled duringgrowth of our business and higher public company expenses, including work performed in preparation for the second quarter of fiscal 2003.Sarbanes-Oxley section 404 implementation. In addition, the expenses for the employee profit sharing program are now distributed into the respective cost centers rather than being reflected as sales, general and administrative expense.

 

SeveranceOther Operating Expense. InOther operating expense increased to $78,000 in the first quarter of fiscal 2003, we incurred $400,000 of severance charges at our Cree Microwave segment for employees that were laid off and received their severance payments during the same period. We did not incur any severance expenses2005 as compared to $3,000 in the first nine monthsquarter of fiscal 2004.

Impairment of Property and Equipment. Impairment of property and equipment decreased 85% to $226,000 in the The first nine months of fiscal 2004 as compared to $1.5 million in the prior year comparative period. During the second and third quarter of fiscal 2004, Cree Microwave identified2005 included a $49,000 equipment write-down to fair market value relating to equipment being disposed of and a $55,000 write-off relating to certain equipment thatpatent applications being abandoned, which was obsolete and recordedpartly offset by a write-down$26,000 gain on the disposal of $173,000. During the second quarter of fiscal 2003, we recorded a $1.4 million write-down for fixed assets associated with a novel epitaxy equipment project that we discontinued. The amount represented a deposit that we paid for equipment that was never delivered from the vendor.old equipment.

 

Gain on Termination of Supply Agreement. In the second quarter of fiscal 2003, we received a $5.0 million one-time payment from Spectrian associated with the termination of the supply agreement between Cree Microwave and Spectrian. There were no similar payments recorded in the first nine months of fiscal 2004.

Loss on Investments in Marketable Securities.The $2.1 million recorded in fiscal 2003 related to a loss realized on marketable securities that we sold during the second quarter of fiscal 2003. There were no significant lossesGain on investments in marketable securities recordedincreased to $118,000 in the first nine months of fiscal 2004.

Other Non-Operating Income (Loss). During the first nine months of fiscal 2004, we recorded non-operating income for a contractually agreed upon payment from one of our customers for a foreign currency translation adjustment included in our sales contract. Also during the third quarter of fiscal 2004, we recognized a one-time technology license fee. There were no similar payments recorded2005 from $0 in the first nine monthsquarter of fiscal 2003.2004. These gains resulted from the sale of a portion of our portfolio investments.

 

Interest Income, net. Interest income, net decreased 28%increased 29% to $2.8$1.1 million in the first nine monthsquarter of fiscal 20042005 from $3.9 million$892,000 in the first quarter of fiscal 2004. The increase from the comparative period in the prior year comparative period. This reduction resulted primarily from lower interest rates available for ourhaving a higher amount of liquid cash and securities-held-to-maturity.over the period. Available cash has increased to $241.0$253 million asin the first quarter of March 28,fiscal 2005 from $195 million in the first quarter of fiscal 2004 from $189.0 million as of March 30, 2003 due to higher profitability generated by theour business.

 

Income Tax Expense. Income tax expense for the first nine monthsquarter of fiscal 20042005 was $16.6$11.8 million compared to $8.3a $4.0 million in tax expense recorded in the first nine monthsquarter of fiscal 2003.2004. Our effective income tax rate was 31%32.5% for the first nine monthsquarter of fiscal 20042005 compared to a 26%31% rate during the comparative period in fiscal 20032004 due to greaterour higher overall profitability and the timing of the passage of federal tax legislation for Federal Research and Development tax credits. At this time, we currently target that our fiscal year 2005 effective tax rate will be approximately 32%. However, this position may change as we are still evaluating our tax provision impact from the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004, which includes anticipated declines in our corporate tax ceiling rate balanced with reduced tax benefits in fiscal 2003 associated with the losses reported in fiscal 2002. During the nine months ended March 28, 2004, our operations also were more profitable than in the comparable period in fiscal 2003. At March 28, 2004, we maintained $8.9 million in deferred tax assets that we did not reserve for as we target profitable operations over the next several periodsforeign sales, and plan to use the assets in their entirety.other factors.

 

Liquidity and Capital Resources

 

We have funded our operations, to date, through sales of equity, bank borrowings and from product and contract gross profits. As of March 28,September 26, 2004, we had working capital of $213.1$194.4 million, including $179.4$176.0 million in cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments held to maturity. As of March 28,September 26, 2004, we have invested $61.6held investments of $76.9 million in long-term securities held to maturity in order to receive a higher interest rate on our cash.cash and investments. Operating

activities generated $101.5$53.8 million in the first nine monthsquarter of fiscal 20042005 compared with $69.4$18.5 million generated in the comparable period in fiscal 2003.2004. This increase was primarily attributable to our operating

results being more profitable in fiscal 2005 than fiscal 2004 thanas net income almost tripled to $24.4 million. During the first quarter of fiscal 2005, we generated $13.1 million from changes in fiscal 2003. Accountsour working capital. Our days sales outstanding was 37 days as of September 26, 2004 based on our monthly revenue profile calculation; however, we expect that our accounts receivable decreasedbalance will increase in the future due to market conditions. Depreciation and amortization increased by $5.8$3.0 million in the first nine monthsquarter of fiscal 2005 over the first quarter of fiscal 2004 due to annew equipment purchased. Inventories increased focus on collections, which more than offset revenue growth. As a result,by $3.4 million to better serve the needs of our days sales outstanding, which is calculatedcustomers. Additionally, our income tax payable grew by $11.5 million due to the tax provision we recorded on our trailing monthly revenue profile, decreased to 36 days. We anticipate that our days sales outstanding will increase to 45 to 60 days going forward as longer terms are typical with somepre-tax income of our customers in Asia. Additionally, inventory decreased $550,000 in the first nine months of fiscal 2004 due to greater sales, and accounts payable and accrued expenses increased $1.2 million in the first nine months of fiscal 2004, due to timing.$36.2 million.

 

Cash used by investing activities in the first nine monthsquarter of fiscal 20042005 was $62.3$41.0 million. Net investments of $8.5$5.4 million were made in securities held to maturity and $48.7$34.7 million was invested in property and equipment. The majority of the increase in spending was due to new equipment additions to increase manufacturing capacity in our crystal growth, epitaxy, clean room and package and test and XLamp product manufacturing areas. Finally, $5.1 million waswe invested $921,000 in patents as well as the purchase of patent rights as we acquired a SiC patent portfolio.prosecution.

 

Cash used inprovided by financing activities was $3.0 million during the nine months ended March 30, 2004. During the second quarter of fiscal 2004, we repurchased 664,000 common shares under our stock repurchase program with an aggregate value of $11.5 million. This has been mostly offset withincluded the receipt of $8.5$4.3 million for the exercise of stock options and shares issued under our employee stock purchase program. We did not repurchase stock during our third quarter of fiscal 2004.options.

 

At this time, we target approximately $65$100 to 75$120 million in capital spending in fiscal 2004,2005, which is slightly lowergreater than fiscal 2003.2004. The capital additions will be primarily for equipment to increase our LED chip production capacity and continued investment in the high power packaged LED XLamp line. We also anticipate higher spendingtarget to spend at least $300 million in fiscal 2005.capital improvements over the next five years. We anticipate that in order to meet the demands of our customers, we must continue to invest in capital expansion during fiscal years 2004 and 2005 as well as improve our manufacturing yields. We anticipate thatcash from operations will fund the majority of the expenditures will be made for new equipment and will be funded by cash from operations.our expenditures. We target that our cash from operations towill be higher in fiscal 20042005 than it was in fiscal 20032004 due to higher targeted profitability resulting from greater targeted revenue. Therefore, we plan to meet the cash needs for the business for fiscal 20042005 through cash from operations.operations and cash on hand. We also anticipate that long term cash needs will be met with cash flow from operations or cash on hand over the next two fiscal years. Actual results may differ from our targets for a number of reasons as we discuss herein. We may also issue additional shares of common stock for the acquisition of complementary businesses or other significant assets. From time to time, we evaluate potential acquisitions in complementary businesses as strategic opportunities and anticipate continuing to make such evaluations. For example, on April 1, 2004, the Company acquired assets for the gallium nitride substrate and epitaxy business from ATMI, Inc in exchange for $10,250,000. The assets acquired included intellectual property, fixed assets and inventory. We may also issue additional shares of common stock for the acquisition of complementary businesses or other significant assets.

 

As of March 28,September 26, 2004, our cash and cash equivalents and short-term investments held to maturity accounts combined increased by $39.4$17.8 million or 28%,11% over balances reported as of June 29, 2003. This was27, 2004 due to our businessincreased cash flow from operations and profitability growth, a decrease in our accounts receivable balance, increases in accounts payable and accrued expenses, offset by a continued spending in property and equipment plus the repurchase of our stock.working capital management. Our accounts receivable balance decreased by $5.8$1.7 million or 13%, as of March 28, 2004 from4% over the accounts receivable balance as of June 29, 2003. While our overall revenue continued to increase, we benefited from an increased focus and improved timing of collections.27, 2004. Our revenue in the thirdfirst quarter of fiscal

2004 2005 was $77.1$95.9 million, which was 20%6% higher than the fourth quarter of fiscal 20032004 revenue of $64.1$90.9 million. As a result, our days sales outstanding, which is calculated on our trailing monthly revenue profile, decreased from 57 days to 36 days. Our net property and equipment has also has increased by $9.0$34.7 million or 4%13% since June 29, 200327, 2004 due to our investments made to expand production capacity. These investments are expectedintended to aid us in meeting current and what we view as increasing future customer product demands on a cost-effective basis. We target that these investments in additional equipment will allow us to meet any increase in demand for our products and thus may lead to higher revenue for us. The higherOur greater property investment will also result in higher depreciation expense. Net deferred income taxes remained unchanged for the quarter. Our income taxes payable grew $11.5 million due to our 32.5% tax provision on our pre-tax income of $36.2 million. Inventory decreased

increased by $550,000$3.4 million since June 29, 200327, 2004 due to higher sales. Our accounts payablesales and accrued expenses decreased $274,000scaling up our factory to meet customer requirements. Marketable securities available for sale increased by $11.2 million or 1% due to timing. Our revenue in51% since the first nine monthsend of fiscal 2004 was $216.0 million, which was 30% higher than the first nine months of fiscal 2003 revenue of $165.8 million. Revenue is recognized from our customers at shipment. For certain customers, we defer revenue for certain sales costs incurred in selling our products and for managing our inventory, updue to the balanceincrease in the unrealized gain of our Color Kinetics investment, based on the deferred revenue.closing stock price as of September 24, 2004 and June 25, 2004. The cumulative unrealized holding gain is $20.5 million as of September 26, 2004. Our deferred revenue account increaseddecreased by $1.6$1.3 million to $7.1 million at September 26, 2004 as a result of the terms of our agreements with Sumitomo and OSRAM, which require us to establish reserves at the time we ship LED products to Sumitomo and OSRAM based upon a percentage of the total purchase price of such products.

Certain Business Risks and Uncertainties

Described below are various risks and uncertainties that may affect our business. These risks and uncertainties are not the only ones we face. Additional risks and uncertainties, both known and unknown, including ones that we currently deem immaterial or that are similar to those faced by other companies in our industry or business in general, may also affect our business. If any of the risks described below actually occur, our business, financial condition or results of operations could be materially and adversely affected.

Our operating results and margins may fluctuate significantly.

Although we experienced significant revenue and earnings growth in the past year, we may not be able to sustain such growth or maintain our margins, and we may experience significant fluctuations in our revenue, earnings and margins in the future. For example, historically, the prices of our LEDs have declined based on market trends. We attempt to maintain our margins by constantly developing improved or new products, which command higher prices, or by lowering the cost of our LEDs. If we are unable to do so, our margins will decline. Our operating results and margins may vary significantly in the future due to many factors, including the following:

our ability to develop, manufacture and deliver products in a timely and cost-effective manner;

variations in the amount of usable product produced during manufacturing (our “yield”);

our ability to improve yields and reduce costs in order to allow lower product pricing without margin reductions;

our ability to ramp up production for our new products;

our ability to convert our substrates used in our volume manufacturing to larger diameters;

our ability to produce higher brightness and more efficient LED products that satisfy customer design requirements;

our ability to develop new products to specifications that meet the evolving needs of our customers;

our ability to generate customer demand for our LDMOS products and ramp up production of those products accordingly;

changes in demand for our products and our customers’ products;

effects of an economic slow down on consumer spending on such items as cell phones, electronic devices and automobiles;

changes in the competitive landscape, such as higher brightness LED products, higher volume production and lower pricing from Asian competitors;

average sales prices for our products declining at a greater rate than anticipated;

changes in the mix of products we sell may vary significantly;

other companies’ inventions of new technology that may make our products obsolete;

product returns or exchanges that could impact our short-term results;

changes in purchase commitments permitted under our contracts with large customers;

changes in production capacity and variations in the utilization of that capacity;

disruptions of manufacturing as a result of damage to our manufacturing facilities from causes such as fire, flood or other casualties, particularly in the case of our single site for SiC wafer and LED production;

our policy to fully reserve for all accounts receivable balances that are more than 90 days past due, which could impact our short-term results; and

changes in Federal budget priorities could adversely affect our contract revenue.

These or other factors could adversely affect our future operating results and margins. If our future operating results or margins are below the expectations of stock market analysts or our investors, our stock price will likely decline.

Our LED revenues are highly dependent on our customers’ ability to source or develop efficient phosphor solutions to enable them to use our LED chips to produce competitive white LED products.

Some of our customers package our blue LEDs with a phosphor coating to create white LEDs. Nichia Corporation (Nichia) currently has the majority of the market share for white LEDs because it has developed a white LED lamp product that includes an efficient phosphor solution to create a bright white output and it has a number of patents that cover portions of the technology. The phosphor solutions that our customers use in their products are not generally as efficient as the phosphor solution that Nichia uses in its products. As a result, the white LEDs that our customers produce historically have not been as bright as Nichia’s white LEDs. We are assisting our customers in their efforts to develop or gain access to more competitive phosphor solutions.Even if our customers are able to develop or secure more competitive phosphor solutions, there can be no assurance that they will be able to compete with Nichia, which has an established market presence. Growth in sales of our high-brightness LED chips used in white light applications is dependent upon our customers’ ability to develop, secure and implement more competitive phosphor solutions.

We are highly dependent on trends in mobile appliances to drive a substantial percentage of LED demand.

Our results of operations could be adversely affected by reduced customer demand for LED products for use in mobile appliances. In the first quarter of fiscal 2005, we derived nearly one-half of our LED revenue and approximately 40% of our overall revenue from sales of our products into mobile appliance applications. Our design wins are spread over numerous models

and customers. Our ability to maintain or increase our LED product revenue depends in part on the number of models into which our customers design our products and the overall demand for these products. Also, design cycles in the handset industry are short and demand is volatile, which makes production planning difficult to forecast.

If we experience poor production yields, our margins could decline and our operating results may suffer.

Our SiC and GaN materials products and our LED, power and RF device products are manufactured using technologies that are highly complex. We manufacture our SiC wafer products from bulk SiC crystals, and we use these SiC wafers to manufacture our LED products and our SiC-based RF and power semiconductors. Our Cree Microwave subsidiary manufactures its RF semiconductors on silicon wafers purchased from others. During our manufacturing process, each wafer is processed to contain numerous die, which are the individual semiconductor devices, and the RF, power devices and XLamp products are further processed by incorporating them into packages for sale as packaged components. The number of usable crystals, wafers, dies and packaged components that result from our production processes can fluctuate as a result of many factors, including but not limited to the following:

impurities in the materials used;

contamination of the manufacturing environment;

equipment failure, power outages or variations in the manufacturing process;

lack of adequate quality and quantity of piece parts and other raw materials;

losses from broken wafers or human errors; and

defects in packaging either within our control or at our subcontractors.

We refer to the proportion of usable product produced at each manufacturing step relative to the gross number that could be constructed from the materials used as our manufacturing yield.

If our yields decrease, our margins could decline and our operating results would be adversely affected. In the past, we have experienced difficulties in achieving acceptable yields on new products, which has adversely affected our operating results.We may experience similar problems in the future, and we cannot predict when they may occur or their severity. For example, we may encounter short-term yield challenges in our LED production as we convert the majority of our production from two-inch wafers to three-inch wafers over the course of this fiscal year. In some instances, we may offer products for future delivery at prices based on planned yield improvements. Reduced yields or failure to achieve planned yield improvements could significantly affect our future margins and operating results.

The markets in which we operate are highly competitive and have evolving technology standards.

The markets for our LED, RF and microwave and power semiconductor products are highly competitive. In the LED market, we compete with companies that manufacture or sell nitride-based LED chips as well as those that sell packaged LEDs. Competitors are offering new UV, blue, green and white LEDs with aggressive prices and improved performance. In the RF power semiconductor field, the products manufactured by Cree Microwave compete with products offered by substantially larger competitors who have dominated the market to date based on

product quality and pricing. The market for SiC wafers is also becoming competitive as other firms in recent years have begun offering SiC wafer products or announced plans to do so. We also expect significant competition for our other products, such as those for use in microwave communications and power switching.

We expect competition to increase. This could mean lower prices for our products, reduced demand for our products and a corresponding reduction in our ability to recover development, engineering and manufacturing costs. Competitors also could invent new technologies that may make our products obsolete. Any of these developments could have an adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

Litigation and SEC matters could adversely affect our operating results and financial condition.

We and certain of our officers and current or former directors are defendants in pending litigation (as described in “Part II, Item 1. Legal Proceedings” of this report) that alleges, among other things, violations of federal securities laws. Defending against existing and potential securities and class action litigation will likely require significant attention and resources and, regardless of the outcome, result in significant legal expenses, which will adversely affect our results unless covered by insurance or recovered from third parties. If our defenses are ultimately unsuccessful, or if we are unable to achieve a favorable resolution, we could be liable for damage awards that could materially adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.

In addition, the SEC in July 2003 initiated an informal inquiry of us and requested that we voluntarily provide certain information to the SEC staff. We have cooperated with the SEC in this informal inquiry. If the SEC elects to pursue a formal investigation of us, responding to any such investigation and any resulting enforcement action could require significant diversion of management’s attention and resources in the future as well as significant legal expense and exposure to possible penalties or fines that could materially adversely affect our results of operations.

Our business and our ability to produce our products may be impaired by claims that we infringe intellectual property rights of others.

Vigorous protection and pursuit of intellectual property rights characterize the semiconductor industry. These traits have resulted in significant and often protracted and expensive litigation. Litigation to determine the validity of patents or claims by third parties of infringement of patents or other intellectual property rights could result in significant expense and divert the efforts of our technical personnel and management, even if the litigation results in a determination favorable to us. In the event of an adverse result in such litigation, we could be required to:

pay substantial damages;

indemnify our customers;

stop the manufacture, use and sale of products found to be infringing;

discontinue the use of processes found to be infringing;

expend significant resources to develop non-infringing products and processes; and/or

obtain a license to use third party technology.

There can be no assurance that third parties will not attempt to assert infringement claims against us with respect to our current or future products. From time to time we receive correspondence asserting that our products or processes are or may be infringing patents or other intellectual property rights of others. Our practice is to investigate such claims to determine whether the assertions have merit and, if so, we take appropriate steps to seek to obtain a license or to avoid the infringement. However, we cannot predict whether a license will be available or that we would find the terms of any license offered acceptable or commercially reasonable. Failure to obtain a necessary license could cause us to incur substantial liabilities and costs and to suspend the manufacture of products.

There are limitations on our ability to protect our intellectual property.

Our intellectual property position is based in part on patents owned by us and patents exclusively licensed to us by North Carolina State University, Boston University and others. The licensed patents include patents relating to the SiC crystal growth process that is central to our SiC materials and device business. We intend to continue to file patent applications in the future, where appropriate, and to pursue such applications with U.S. and foreign patent authorities.

However, we cannot be sure that patents will be issued on such applications or that our existing or future patents will not be successfully contested by third parties. Also, since issuance of a valid patent does not prevent other companies from using alternative, non-infringing technology, we cannot be sure that any of our patents (or patents issued to others and licensed to us) will provide significant commercial protection, especially as new competitors enter the market.

In addition to patent protection, we also rely on trade secrets and other non-patented proprietary information relating to our product development and manufacturing activities. We try to protect this information through appropriate efforts to maintain its secrecy, including requiring employees and third parties to sign confidentiality agreements. We cannot be sure that these efforts will be successful or that the confidentiality agreements will not be breached. We also cannot be sure that we would have adequate remedies for any breach of such agreements or other misappropriation of our trade secrets, or that our trade secrets and proprietary know-how will not otherwise become known or be independently discovered by others.

Where necessary, we may initiate litigation to enforce our patent or other intellectual property rights. Any such litigation may require us to spend a substantial amount of time and money and could distract management from our day-to-day operations. Moreover, there is no assurance that we will be successful in any such litigation.

If we are unable to produce and sell adequate quantities of our high-brightness and mid-brightness LED chip products and improve our yields, our operating results may suffer.

We believe that our ability to gain customer acceptance of our high-brightness and mid-brightness LED chip products and to achieve higher volume production and lower production costs for those products will be important to our future operating results. We must reduce costs of these products to avoid margin reductions from the lower selling prices we may offer due to our competitive environment and/or to satisfy prior contractual commitments. Achieving greater volumes and lower costs requires improved production yields for these products. We are continuing to work with our customers to develop and expand our XBright products to help meet

their market and packaging requirements.We may encounter manufacturing difficulties as we ramp up our capacity to make our newest products.Our failure to produce adequate quantities and improve the yields of any of these products could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition. Some of our customers may encounter difficulties with their manufacturing processes using our XBright and XThin devices due to the non-standard die attachment processes required, which could increase product returns and impact customer demand, each of which would have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

Our operating results are substantially dependent on the development of new products based on our SiC and GaN technology.

Our future success will depend on our ability to develop new SiC and GaN solutions for existing and new markets. We must introduce new products in a timely and cost-effective manner, and we must secure production orders from our customers. The development of new SiC and GaN products is a highly complex process, and we historically have experienced delays in completing the development and introduction of new products. Products currently under development include larger, higher quality substrates and epitaxy, high power RF and microwave devices in both SiC and GaN, SiC power devices, near UV laser diodes, higher brightness, thinner LED products and high power packaged LEDs. The successful development and introduction of these products depends on a number of factors, including the following:

achievement of technology breakthroughs required to make commercially viable devices;

the accuracy of our predictions of market requirements and evolving standards;

acceptance of our new product designs;

the availability of qualified development personnel;

our timely completion of product designs and development;

our ability to develop repeatable processes to manufacture new products in sufficient quantities for commercial sales;

our customers’ ability to develop applications incorporating our products; and

acceptance of our customers’ products by the market.

If any of these or other factors become problematic, we may not be able to develop and introduce these new products in a timely or cost-efficient manner.

We must generate new customer demand for our LDMOS products in order to offset expenses of our Cree Microwave segment.

Revenues of our Cree Microwave segment will depend on our ability to attract new customers for our LDMOS products. Due to the current market environment for microwave devices and the lengthy customer design-in and qualification process for our LDMOS products, it may take many quarters to develop new customers for our Cree Microwave segment and we may not succeed in doing so. Until we develop sufficient new business for Cree Microwave’s products, our expenses for this segment will exceed its revenues. Although we are considering strategic alternatives with respect to our Cree Microwave business, we cannot predict whether we will be able to enter into any suitable arrangement.

We depend on a few large customers, and our revenues can be affected by their contract terms.

Historically, a substantial portion of our revenue has come from large purchases by a small number of customers. Accordingly, our future operating results depend on the success of our largest customers and on our success in selling large quantities of our products to them. The concentration of our revenues with a few large customers makes us particularly susceptible to on factors affecting those customers. For example, if demand for their products decreases, they may limit or stop purchasing our products and our operating results could suffer. In addition, our Sumitomo contract provides that Sumitomo may decrease its purchase commitment or terminate the contract if its inventory of our products reaches a specified level. In general, the success of our relationships with our customers is subject to a number of factors, including the current dynamics of the overall market. For example, if some of our competitors were to license technology or form alliances with other parties, our business may be impacted.

We face significant challenges managing our growth.

We have experienced a period of significant growth that has challenged our management and other resources. We have grown from 390 employees on June 27, 1999 to 1,235 employees on June 27, 2004 and from revenues of $60.1 million for the fiscal year ended June 27, 1999 to $306.9 million for the fiscal year ended June 27, 2004. To manage our growth effectively, we must continue to:

implement and improve operating systems;

maintain adequate manufacturing facilities and equipment to meet customer demand;

improve the skills and capabilities of our current management team;

add experienced senior level managers; and

attract and retain qualified people with experience in engineering, design and technical marketing support.

We will spend substantial amounts of money in supporting our growth and may have additional unexpected costs. We may not be able to expand quickly enough to exploit potential market opportunities. Our future operating results will also depend on expanding sales and marketing, research and development and administrative support. If we cannot attract qualified people or manage growth effectively, our business, operating results and financial condition could be adversely affected. Conversely, if the product demand from our customers does not expand as projected by us, we may sustain lower margins, as we will incur higher costs associated with the greater capacity that has been added recently and would not be used.

Performance of our investments in other companies could negatively affect our financial condition.

From time to time, we have made investments in public and private companies that engage in complementary businesses. Should the value of any such investments we hold decline, the related write-down in value could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition as reflected in our consolidated balance sheets. In addition, if the decline in value is determined to be other-than-temporary, the related write-down could have a material adverse effect on our reported net income. For example, in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2002 we recorded a non-operating

charge of $22 million (pre-tax) relating to the declines in the value of equity investments determined to be other-than-temporary as a result of continued depressed market conditions. On September 26, 2004, we held interests in one public company as well as several private companies. Each of these investments is subject to the risks inherent in the business of the company in which we have invested and to trends affecting the equity markets as a whole. Our private company investments are subject to additional risks relating to the limitations on transferability of our interests due to the lack of a public market and to other transfer restrictions. Our investment in a publicly held company exposes us to market risks and could be subject to contractual limitations on transferability. For example, we are restricted from selling our shares in Color Kinetics for a period of 180 days from June 29,22, 2004, the date of their initial public offering. As a result, we may not be able to reduce the size of our positions or liquidate our investments when we deem appropriate to limit our downside risk.

Our manufacturing capacity may not be sufficient to keep up with customer demand.

We experienced significant growth in fiscal 2004 and are operating near capacity for LED products. Although we are taking steps to address our manufacturing capacity concerns, if we are not able to increase our capacity quickly enough to respond to customer demand, if our expansion plans are not adequate enough to address our capacity constraints or if ramping up new capacity costs more than we anticipate, our business and results of operation could be adversely affected.

As part of our initiative to address these capacity concerns, we are in the process of transitioning our production process in several ways. First, we are shifting production of the majority of our LED products from two-inch wafers to three-inch wafers over the course of fiscal 2005. We must first qualify our production processes for each product on systems designed to accommodate the larger wafer size, and some of our existing production equipment must be refitted for the larger wafer size. In the past we have experienced lower yields for a period of time following a transition to a larger wafer size until use of the larger wafer is fully integrated in production and we begin to achieve production efficiency. We anticipate that we will experience similar temporary yield reductions during the transition to the three-inch wafers. If we experience delays in the qualification process, the transition phase takes longer than we expect, or if we are unable to attain expected yield improvements, our operating results may be adversely affected. We also are in the process of qualifying our Sunnyvale, California location to produce SiC Schottky diode products and transitioning production of Schottky diode products to that location over the next several quarters. We may experience a transition period as we start to ramp up production in which our yields are low or our production costs do not meet our expectations. If we experience delays in qualifying this facility for production of SiC Schottky diodes, if this transition period extends longer than we expect, or if we are not able to achieve the production levels and margins we expect, our operating results could be adversely affected.

We also are exploring ways to expand our manufacturing capacity and plan to make certain expenditures in the coming fiscal year to acquire new equipment. Any potential expansion projects may be delayed, cost more than we anticipate or require long transition periods, any of which could impact our ability to meet our customers’ demands and affect our operating results.

We rely on a few key suppliers.

We depend on a limited number of suppliers for certain raw materials, components, services and equipment used in manufacturing our products, including key materials and equipment used in critical stages of our manufacturing processes. We generally purchase these limited source items with purchase orders, and we have no guaranteed supply arrangements with such suppliers. If we were to lose such key suppliers, our manufacturing operations could be interrupted or hampered significantly.

If government agencies or other customers discontinue or curtail their funding for our research and development programs our business may suffer.

Changes in Federal budget priorities could adversely affect our contract revenue. Historically, government agencies and other customers have funded a significant portion of our research and development activities. Government contracts are subject to the risk that the government agency may not appropriate and allocate all funding contemplated by the contract. In addition, our government contracts generally permit the contracting authority to terminate the contracts for the convenience of the government, and the full value of the contracts would not be realized if they are prematurely terminated. Furthermore, we may be unable to incur sufficient allowable costs to generate the full estimated contract values, and there is some risk that any technologies developed under these contracts may not have commercial value. If government and customer funding is discontinued or reduced, our ability to develop or enhance products could be limited, and our business, results of operations and financial condition could be adversely affected.

If our products fail to perform or meet customer requirements, we could incur significant additional costs.

The manufacture of our products involves highly complex processes. Our customers specify quality, performance and reliability standards that we must meet. If our products do not meet these standards, we may be required to replace or rework the products. In some cases our products may contain undetected defects or flaws that only become evident after shipment. We have experienced product quality, performance or reliability problems from time to time. Defects or failures may occur in the future. If failures or defects occur, we could:

lose revenue;

incur increased costs, such as warranty expense and costs associated with customer support;

experience delays, cancellations or rescheduling of orders for our products;

write down existing inventory; or

experience product returns.

We are subject to risks from international sales.

Sales to customers located outside the U.S. accounted for approximately 83%, 80% and 65% of our revenue in fiscal 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively. We expect that revenue from international sales will continue to March 28,be the majority of our total revenue. International sales are subject to a variety of risks, including risks arising from currency fluctuations, trading restrictions, tariffs, trade barriers and taxes. Also, U.S. Government export controls could restrict or prohibit the exportation of products with defense applications. Because all of our foreign sales are denominated in U.S. dollars, our prices become less competitive in countries with currencies that are low or are declining in value against the U.S. dollar.

If we fail to evaluate and implement strategic opportunities successfully, our business may suffer.

From time to time we evaluate strategic opportunities available to us for product, technology or business acquisitions. For example, in fiscal 2004 we acquired the gallium nitride substrate and epitaxy business of ATMI, Inc. If we choose to $7.1 million.make an acquisition, we face certain risks, such as failure of the acquired business in meeting our performance expectations, diversion of management attention, retention of existing customers of the acquired business and difficulty in integrating the acquired business’s operations, personnel and financial and operating systems into our current business. We may not be able to successfully address these risks or any other problems that arise from our recent or future acquisitions. Any failure to successfully evaluate strategic opportunities and address risks or other problems that arise related to any acquisition could adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.

These or other factors could adversely affect our future operating results and margins. If our future operating results or margins are below the expectations of stock market analysts or our investors, our stock price may decline.

 

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures aboutAbout Market Risk

 

Quantitative Disclosures:As of September 26, 2004, we held a long-term investment in the equity securities of Color Kinetics, which is treated for accounting purposes under SFAS 115 as available-for-sale securities. This investment is carried at fair market value based upon quoted market price of that investment as of September 24, 2004, with net unrealized gains or losses excluded from earnings and reported as a separate component of shareholders’ equity.

It is our policy to write down these types of equity investments to their market value and record the related write down as an investment loss on our consolidated statements of operations if we believe that an other-than-temporary decline existed in our marketable equity securities. As of September 26, 2004, we do not believe that an other-than-temporary decline existed in our investment in Color Kinetics as the market value of the security was above our cost. This investment is subject to market risk of equity price changes. The fair market value of this investment as of September 26, 2004, using the closing sale price as of September 24, 2004, was $33.2 million.

 

As of March 28,September 26, 2004, we held nohold investments in marketablethe equity securities; however, anof private companies valued at $2.9 million. An adverse movement of equity market prices would likely have an impact on our portfolio of non-marketable strategic equity securities,investments in private companies, although the impact cannot be directly quantified. Such a movement and the related underlying economic conditions could negatively affect the prospects offor the private companies we invest in,have invested, their ability to raise additional capital and the likelihood of our being able to realize ourgains on these investments through liquidity events such as initial public offerings, mergers and private sales. At March 28, 2004,

We hold and expect to continue to consider investments in minority interests in companies having operations or technology in areas within our non-marketable strategic equityfocus. We generally are not subject to material market risk with respect to our investments classified as marketable securities hadas such

investments are readily marketable, liquid and do not fluctuate substantially from stated values. Many of our investments are in early stage companies or technology companies where operations are not yet sufficient to establish them as profitable concerns. One of our investments is in a net book valuepublicly traded company whose share prices are subject to market risk. Management continues to evaluate its investment positions on an ongoing basis. See the footnote, “Investments” in the consolidated financial statements included in Part 1 Item 1 of $15.6 million.this report for further information on our policies regarding investments in private and public companies.

 

We have invested some of the proceeds from our January 2000 public offering into high-grade corporate debt, commercial paper, government securities and other investments at fixed interest rates that vary by security. These investments are A grade or better per our cash management investment policy. At March 28,September 26, 2004, we had $140.1$154.4 million invested in these securities. Although these securities generally earn interest at fixed rates, the historical fair values of such investments have not differed materially from the amounts reported on our consolidated balance sheets. Therefore, we believe that potential changes in future interest rates will not create material exposure for us from differences between the fair values and the amortized cost of these investments.

 

We currently have no debt outstanding. With two of our larger customers, we make a foreign currency adjustment as a function of certain exchange rates against the U.S. dollar. These non-operating income adjustments represent our main risk with respect to foreign currency, since our contracts and purchase orders are denominated in U.S. dollars. We also have no commodity risk.

Qualitative Disclosures

We hold no investments in publicly traded equity securities at this time.

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

 

Our management, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,1934), as amended (the “Exchange Act”)) as of the end of the period covered by this Form 10-Q. Based on such evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that, as of the end of the period covered by this Form 10-Q, our disclosure controls and procedures provide reasonable assurances that the information we are required to disclose in the reports we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time period required by the United States Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms. From time to time, we make changes to our internal controls over financial reporting that are intended to enhance the effectiveness of our internal controls and which do not have a material effect on our overall internal controls. We will continue to evaluate the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures and internal controls over financial reporting on an ongoing basis and will take action as appropriate.There have been no changes in our internal controlcontrols over financial reporting (asas such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15(d)-15(f)15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act)Act during the period covered by this Form 10-Qfirst quarter of fiscal 2005 that havewe believe materially affected, or arewill be reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal controlcontrols over financial reporting.

PART II - OTHER INFORMATION

 

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

 

In re Cree, Inc. Securities Litigation and Related Cases

 

As reported in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal 2003 and in our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the second quarter of fiscalyear ended June 27, 2004, there is pending in the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina a consolidated class action seeking damages for alleged violations of securities laws by the Company and certain of our officers and current and former directors. In February 2004, we moved that the court dismiss the consolidated amended complaint on the grounds that it failsfailed to state a claim upon which relief can be granted and doesdid not satisfy the pleading requirements under applicable law. The motion is currently pending.

As also reported in our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the second quarter of fiscal 2004, there was pending before the same court a purported derivative action that named certain of our directors as defendants and named the Company as a nominal defendant. In FebruaryOn August 30, 2004, the individual defendants moved that the court dismiss the derivative complaint on the ground that it failed to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. The plaintiff subsequently filed a motion, which the defendants did not oppose, requesting that the court allow the plaintiff to dismiss the action voluntarily without prejudice. The court entered an order granting the motion to dismiss without prejudice and dismissingallotting 45 days for the derivative actionplaintiffs to file an amended consolidated complaint. The plaintiffs filed a First Amended Consolidated Class Action Complaint on October 14, 2004, asserting essentially the same claims and seeking the same relief as in Marchtheir prior complaint. The Company expects to file a motion to dismiss the Amended Complaint on or before November 15, 2004.

 

Trustees of Boston University and Cree Lighting Company v. AXT, Inc.

As reported in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal 2003, in June 2003 Boston University and our subsidiary, Cree Lighting Company (which later merged into Cree, Inc.), commenced a patent infringement lawsuit against AXT, Inc.We believe that the claims set forth in the U.S. District Court foramended consolidated complaint are without merit. However, we are unable to predict the Northern Districtfinal outcome of California. In March 2004 Boston Universitythese matters with certainty. Our failure to successfully defend against these allegations could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and the Company reached a settlement with AXT in which the parties agreed to the dismissalresults of all claims and counterclaims. The resolution of the disputes is reflected in the Company’s consolidated financial statements for the third quarter of fiscal 2004.

Other Legal Proceedingsoperations.

 

During the third quarter of fiscalthree months ended September 26, 2004, there were no other material developments in the legal proceedings previously reported in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal 2003 and our Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q for the first two quarters of fiscal 2004. Please refer to Part I, Item 3 of theCompany’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 29, 2003 and Part II,27, 2004. Please refer to Item 13 of the Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q for the quarterly periods ended September 28, 2003 and December 28, 2003, respectively,10-K for a description of other material legal proceedings.

The Company is also involved in other legal proceedings not described in this report or in the reports noted above. Although the final resolution of these other matters cannot be predicted with certainty, management’s present judgment is that the final outcome of these matters will not likely have a material adverse effect on the Company’s consolidated financial condition or results of operations. If an unfavorable resolution occurs in these legal proceedings, our financial condition and results of operations could be materially adversely affected.pending through September 26, 2004.

 

Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K

(a) Exhibits

 

The following exhibits are being filed herewith and are numbered in accordance with Item 601 of Regulation S-K:

 

3.1Amended and Restated Bylaws
10.12004 Long-Term Incentive Compensation Plan
10.2Fiscal 2005 Management Incentive Compensation Plan
10.3Form of Master Stock Option Award Agreement for Grants of Nonqualified Stock Options to Non-employee Directors (1)
10.4Form of Master Stock Option Award Agreement for Grants of Nonqualified Stock Options to Employees (1)
10.5Charles M. Swoboda Employment Agreement (2)
10.6Letter Agreement, dated September 10, 2004, between the Company, Sumitomo Corporation and Sumitomo Corporation of America (asterisks located within the exhibit denote information which has been deleted pursuant to a request for confidential treatment filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission)
31.1  Certification Pursuantby Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted PursuantRule 13a-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
31.2  Certification Pursuantby Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted PursuantRule 13a-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
32.1  Certification Pursuantby Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuantas adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
32.2  Certification Pursuantby Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuantas adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
99.1Certain Business Risks and Uncertainties2002

(b) Reports on Form 8-K:

On February 27, 2004, the Company furnished a Current Report on Form 8-K, announcing that the Company’s Board of Directors had extended the Company’s stock repurchase program through February 2005 and confirming the third quarter financial targets provided in its January 15, 2004 press release. Information furnished in the Form 8-K referenced in the prior sentence is not deemed to be filed with the SEC.

On January 15, 2004, the Company furnished a Current Report on Form 8-K, containing its press release announcing results for the period ended December 28, 2003. Information furnished in the Form 8-K referenced in the prior sentence is not deemed to be filed with the SEC.


(1)Incorporated by reference herein. Filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Current Report filed on Form 8-K with the Securities and Exchange Commission on October 7, 2004.
(2)Incorporated by reference herein. Filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Current Report filed on Form 8-K with the Securities and Exchange Commission on October 19, 2004.

SIGNATURES

 

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

 

  

CREE, INC.

Date: May 4,November 5, 2004

 

/s/ Cynthia B. Merrell


  

Cynthia B. Merrell

  

Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer

  

(Authorized Officer and Chief Financial and

Accounting Officer)

EXHIBIT INDEX

 

Exhibit No.

Description


  3.1Amended and Restated Bylaws
10.12004 Long-Term Incentive Compensation Plan
10.2Fiscal 2005 Management Incentive Plan
10.3Form of Master Stock Option Award Agreement for Grants of Nonqualified Stock Options to Non-employee Directors (1)
10.4Form of Master Stock Option Award Agreement for Grants of Nonqualified Stock Options to Employees (1)
10.5Charles M. Swoboda Employment Agreement (2)
10.6Letter Agreement, dated September 10, 2004, between the Company, Sumitomo Corporation and Sumitomo Corporation of America (asterisks located within the exhibit denote information which has been deleted pursuant to a request for confidential treatment filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission)
31.1Certification by Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
31.2Certification by Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
32.1Certification by Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
32.2Certification by Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

(1)Incorporated by reference herein. Filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Current Report filed on Form 8-K with the Securities and Exchange Commission on October 7, 2004.

41

(2)Incorporated by reference herein. Filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Current Report filed on Form 8-K with the Securities and Exchange Commission on October 19, 2004.