UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington D.C. 20549

 


 

FORM 10-Q

 


 

xQUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

For the quarterly period ended DecemberMarch 31, 20042005

 

OR

 

¨TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

For the transition period from            to            

 

Commission File Number 1-12607

 


 

SUNLINK HEALTH SYSTEMS, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

 


 

Ohio 31-0621189

(State or other jurisdiction of

incorporation or organization)

 

(I.R.S. Employer

Identification No.)

 

900 Circle 75 Parkway, Suite 1120, Atlanta, Georgia 30339

(Address of principal executive offices)

(Zip Code)

 

(770) 933-7000

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

 


 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filings requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  x    No  ¨

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    Yes  ¨    No  x

 

The number of Common Shares, without par value, outstanding as of February 8,May 5, 2005 was 7,156,453.7,164,703.

 



PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

SUNLINK HEALTH SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(in thousands)

(unaudited)

   December 31,
2004


  June 30,
2004


 
   (unaudited)    

ASSETS

         

Current Assets:

         

Cash and cash equivalents

  $3,546  $7,079 

Receivables - net

   13,106   12,368 

Medical supplies

   2,296   2,240 

Deferred income tax asset

   1,021   1,021 

Prepaid expenses and other

   1,976   1,934 
   


 


Total Current Assets

   21,945   24,642 

Property, Plant and Equipment, at cost

   40,139   38,952 

Less accumulated depreciation and amortization

   5,852   4,668 
   


 


Property, Plant and Equipment - net

   34,287   34,284 

Goodwill

   2,944   2,944 

Other assets

   1,937   1,282 
   


 


Total Assets

  $61,113  $63,152 
   


 


LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY

         

Current Liabilities:

         

Accounts payable

  $5,213  $6,473 

Revolving advances

   —     2,591 

Third-party payor settlements

   6,064   4,396 

Current maturities of long-term debt

   840   826 

Accrued payroll and related taxes

   3,395   4,010 

Income taxes

   323   3,985 

Other accrued expenses

   6,253   6,424 
   


 


Total Current Liabilities

   22,088   28,705 

Long-Term Liabilities:

         

Long-term debt

   9,497   6,566 

Noncurrent liability for professional liability risks

   2,350   1,548 

Noncurrent liabilities of discontinued operations

   1,483   1,429 
   


 


Total Long-term Liabilities

   13,330   9,543 

Commitments and Contingencies

         

Shareholders’ Equity:

         

Common shares, without par value:

         

Issued and outstanding, 7,156 shares at December 31, 2004 and 7,072 shares at June 30, 2004

   3,578   3,536 

Additional paid-in capital

   7,553   7,400 

Common share warrants

   —     230 

Retained earnings

   15,094   14,145 

Accumulated other comprehensive loss

   (530)  (407)
   


 


Total Shareholders’ Equity

   25,695   24,904 
   


 


Total Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity

  $61,113  $63,152 
   


 


   March 31,
2005


  June 30,
2004


 
ASSETS         

Current Assets:

         

Cash and cash equivalents

  $3,622  $7,079 

Receivables - net

   15,197   12,368 

Medical supplies

   2,288   2,240 

Deferred income tax asset

   1,279   1,021 

Prepaid expenses and other

   1,930   1,934 
   


 


Total Current Assets

   24,316   24,642 

Property, Plant and Equipment, at cost

   41,236   38,952 

Less accumulated depreciation and amortization

   6,490   4,668 
   


 


Property, Plant and Equipment - net

   34,746   34,284 

Goodwill

   2,944   2,944 

Other assets

   1,833   1,282 
   


 


Total Assets

  $63,839  $63,152 
   


 


LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY         

Current Liabilities:

         

Accounts payable

  $5,438  $6,473 

Revolving advances

   —     2,591 

Third-party payor settlements

   4,349   4,396 

Current maturities of long-term debt

   840   826 

Accrued payroll and related taxes

   4,615   4,010 

Income taxes

   307   3,985 

Other accrued expenses

   6,624   6,424 
   


 


Total Current Liabilities

   22,173   28,705 

Long-Term Liabilities:

         

Long-term debt

   9,293   6,566 

Noncurrent liability for professional liability risks

   2,880   1,548 

Noncurrent liabilities of discontinued operations

   1,364   1,429 
   


 


Total Long-term Liabilities

   13,537   9,543 

Commitments and Contingencies

         

Shareholders’ Equity:

         

Preferred shares, authorized and unissued, 2,000 shares

         

Common shares, without par value:

         

Issued and outstanding, 7,165 shares at March 31, 2005 and 7,072 shares at June 30, 2004

   3,582   3,536 

Additional paid-in capital

   7,564   7,400 

Common share warrants

   —     230 

Retained earnings

   17,534   14,145 

Accumulated other comprehensive loss

   (551)  (407)
   


 


Total Shareholders’ Equity

   28,129   24,904 
   


 


Total Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity

  $63,839  $63,152 
   


 


 

See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

 

2


SUNLINK HEALTH SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EARNINGS

(in thousands, except per share amounts)

(unaudited)

 

  

THREE MONTHS ENDED

December 31,


 SIX MONTHS ENDED
December 31,


   

THREE MONTHS ENDED

March 31,


 

NINE MONTHS ENDED

March 31,


 
  2004

 2003

 2004

 2003

   2005

 2004

 2005

 2004

 

Net Revenues

  $31,291  $30,179  $61,748  $51,441   $33,893  $29,995  $95,641  $81,436 

Cost of Patient Service Revenues:

      

Salaries, wages and benefits

   15,068   14,053   29,724   24,179    16,179   14,838   45,903   39,017 

Provision for bad debts

   3,264   3,148   6,271   6,016    2,528   2,270   8,799   8,286 

Supplies

   3,456   3,419   6,925   5,963    3,782   3,531   10,707   9,494 

Purchased services

   1,860   1,940   3,590   3,460    1,979   1,795   5,569   5,255 

Other operating expenses

   5,085   4,810   10,385   7,906    5,253   4,668   15,638   12,574 

Rent and lease expense

   641   738   1,584   1,302    644   696   2,228   1,998 

Depreciation and amortization

   589   532   1,223   867    654   539   1,877   1,406 
  


 


 


 


  


 


 


 


Cost of patient service revenues

   29,963   28,640   59,702   49,693    31,019   28,337   90,721   78,030 
  


 


 


 


  


 


 


 


Operating Profit

   1,328   1,539   2,046   1,748    2,874   1,658   4,920   3,406 

Other Income (Expense):

      

Interest expense

   (276)  (1,271)  (596)  (2,217)   (253)  (1,199)  (849)  (3,416)

Interest income

   12   7   25   10    8   7   33   17 

Loss on early repayment of debt

   (384)  —     (384)  —      —     —     (384)  —   
  


 


 


 


  


 


 


 


Earnings (Loss) From Continuing Operations before Income Taxes

   680   275   1,091   (459)

Earnings From Continuing Operations before Income Taxes

   2,629   466   3,720   7 

Income Tax Expense

   28   97   116   126    176   61   292   187 
  


 


 


 


  


 


 


 


Earnings (Loss) From Continuing Operations

   652   178   975   (585)   2,453   405   3,428   (180)

Earnings (Loss) from Discontinued Operations

   37   (296)  23   (623)   (14)  (76)  9   (699)
  


 


 


 


  


 


 


 


Net Earnings (Loss)

  $689  $(118) $998  $(1,208)  $2,439  $329  $3,437  $(879)
  


 


 


 


  


 


 


 


Earnings (Loss) Per Share:

      

Continuing Operations:

      

Basic

  $0.09  $0.03  $0.14  $(0.10)  $0.34  $0.06  $0.48  $(0.03)
  


 


 


 


  


 


 


 


Diluted

  $0.08  $0.03  $0.13  $(0.10)  $0.32  $0.06  $0.45  $(0.03)
  


 


 


 


  


 


 


 


Net Earnings:

      

Basic

  $0.10  $(0.02) $0.14  $(0.21)  $0.34  $0.05  $0.48  $(0.15)
  


 


 


 


  


 


 


 


Diluted

  $0.09  $(0.02) $0.13  $(0.21)  $0.32  $0.05  $0.45  $(0.15)
  


 


 


 


  


 


 


 


Weighted-Average Common Shares Outstanding:

      

Basic

   7,162   6,338   7,168   5,698    7,158   6,406   7,165   5,932 
  


 


 


 


  


 


 


 


Diluted

   7,673   6,717   7,687   5,698    7,707   6,949   7,693   5,932 
  


 


 


 


  


 


 


 


 

See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

 

3


SUNLINK HEALTH SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(in thousands)

(unaudited)

 

  

SIX MONTHS ENDED

December 31,


   NINE MONTHS ENDED
March 31,


 
  2004

 2003

   2005

 2004

 

Net Cash Provided By (Used In) Operating Activities

  $(2,831) $(711)

Net Cash Used In Operating Activities

  $(1,350) $(324)

Cash Flows From Investing Activities:

      

Expenditures for property, plant and equipment - continuing operations

   (1,192)  (1,718)   (2,298)  (774)

Expenditures for property, plant and equipment - discontinued operations

    (444)   —     (491)

Cash acquired in HealthMont acquisition

   —     95    —     95 
  


 


  


 


Net Cash Used in Investing Activities

   (1,192)  (2,067)   (2,298)  (1,170)

Cash Flows From Financing Activities:

      

Proceeds from issuance of common shares

   25   131    41   669 

Proceeds from long-term debt

   10,000   4,041    10,000   2,300 

Revolving advances, net

   (2,591)  2,281    (2,591)  3,026 

Payments on long-term debt

   (6,944)  (670)   (7,259)  (2,790)
  


 


  


 


Net Cash Provided by (Used in) Financing Activities

   490   5,783 

Net Cash Provided by Financing Activities

   191   3,205 

Effect of Exchange Rate Changes on Cash

   —     1    —     1 
  


 


  


 


Net Increase (Decrease) in Cash and Cash Equivalents

   (3,533)  3,006    (3,457)  1,712 

Cash and Cash Equivalents at Beginning of Period

   7,079   1,773    7,079   1,773 
  


 


  


 


Cash and Cash Equivalents at End of Period

  $3,546  $4,779   $3,622  $3,485 
  


 


  


 


Supplemental Disclosure of Cash Flow Information:

      

Noncash investing and financing activities - Long-term debt issued as payment-in-kind for interest payable

  $—    $1,113 
  


 


Cash Paid For:

      

Interest, net of amounts capitalized

  $489  $864   $857  $1,401 
  


 


  


 


Income taxes

  $3,873  $336   $4,370  $336 
  


 


  


 


 

See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

 

4


SUNLINK HEALTH SYSTEMS, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

THREE AND NINE MONTHS ENDED DECEMBERMARCH 31, 20042005

(dollars in thousands, except share and per share amounts)

(unaudited)

 

Note 1. - Basis of Presentation

 

The accompanying unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements as of and for the three and sixnine month periods ended DecemberMarch 31, 20042005 have been prepared in accordance with Rule 10-01 of Regulation S-X of the Securities and Exchange Commission and, as such, do not include all information required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. These Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements included in the SunLink Health Systems, Inc. (“SunLink” or the “Company”) Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2004, filed on September 28, 2004. In the opinion of management, the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, which are unaudited, include all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments, necessary to present fairly the financial position and results of operations for the periods indicated. The results of operations for the three and sixnine month periods ended DecemberMarch 31, 20042005 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the entire fiscal year or any other interim period.

 

Note 2. – Business Operations and Corporate Strategy

 

SunLink is a provider of healthcare services through the operation of exurban and rural community hospitals in the United States. In February 2001, SunLink acquired its initial six hospitals and began healthcare operations. On October 3, 2003, SunLink acquired two additional hospitals from HealthMont, Inc. (“HealthMont”). On June 1, 2004, SunLink sold its Mountainside Medical Center (“Mountainside”), a 35-bed hospital located in Jasper, Georgia. Through its subsidiaries, SunLink operates a total of seven community hospitals in four states. Six of the hospitals are owned and one is leased. SunLink also operates certain related businesses consisting primarily of nursing homes located adjacent to certain of its hospitals and home health agencies servicing areas around its hospitals. The healthcare operations comprise a single business segment: community hospitals. SunLink currently does not have operations in other business segments. SunLink’s hospitals are acute-care hospitals and have a total of 402 licensed beds.

 

SunLink’s business strategy is to focus its efforts on internal growth of its seven hospitals supplemented by growth from selected hospital acquisitions. During the sixnine months ended DecemberMarch 31, 2004,2005, SunLink concentrated its efforts on the operations and improvement of its existing hospitals. During the past year, SunLink has evaluated certain hospitals which were for sale and monitored selected hospitals which SunLink determined might become available for sale. SunLink continues to engage in similar evaluation and monitoring activities with respect to hospitals which are or may become available for acquisition.

 

Note 3. – Discontinued Operations

 

All of the businesses discussed below are reported as discontinued operations and the condensed consolidated financial statements for all prior periods have been adjusted to reflect this presentation.

 

5


Results for all of the businesses included in discontinued operations are presented in the following table:

 

  Three Months Ended
December 31,


 Six Months Ended
December 31,


   Three Months Ended
March 31,


 Nine Months Ended
March 31,


 
  2004

 2003

 2004

 2003

   2005

 2004

 2005

 2004

 

Net revenues of Mountainside

  $0  $5,634  $0  $10,889   $0  $5,715  $0  $16,604 
  


 


 


 


  


 


 


 


Earnings (Loss) from discontinued operations:

      

Mountainside Medical Center:

      

Earnings (Loss) from operations

  $51  $(304) $51  $(616)  $—    $7  $51  $(609)

Child safety segment:

   

Loss from operations

   —     (65)  —     (65)

Life sciences and engineering segment:

      

Earnings (Loss) from operations

   (14)  8   (28)  (7)   (14)  (18)  (42)  (25)
  


 


 


 


  


 


 


 


Earnings (Loss) from discontinued operations

  $37  $(296) $23  $(623)  $(14) $(76) $9  $(699)
  


 


 


 


  


 


 


 


 

Mountainside Medical Center –On– On June 1, 2004, SunLink completed the sale of its Mountainside Medical Center hospital in Jasper, Georgia, for approximately $40,000, pursuant to the terms of an asset sale agreement. Under the terms of the agreement, SunLink sold the operations of Mountainside, which included the property, plant and equipment and the supplies inventory. SunLink retained Mountainside’s working capital except for supplies inventory. The net proceeds of the sale were used to repay debt and related transaction costs.

 

The retained assets and liabilities of Mountainside are shown in Other current assets and Other accrued expenses on the consolidated balance sheet.

 

Life Sciences and Engineering Segment – SunLink retained a defined benefit retirement plan which covered substantially all of the employees of this segment when it was sold in fiscal 1998. Effective February 28, 1997, the plan was amended to freeze participant benefits and close the plan to new participants. Included in discontinued operations for the three and sixnine months ended DecemberMarch 31, 20042005 and 2003,2004, respectively, were the following:

 

  Three Months Ended
December 31,


 Six Months Ended
December 31,


   Three Months Ended
March 31,


 Nine Months Ended
March 31,


 
  2004

 2003

 2004

 2003

   2005

 2004

 2005

 2004

 

Service cost

  $—    $—    $—    $—     $—    $—    $—    $—   

Interest cost

   21   28   42   50    21   21   63   62 

Expected return on assets

   (14)  (18)  (28)  (32)   (14)  (13)  (42)  (39)

Amortization of prior service cost

   7   9   14   16    7   10   21   29 
  


 


 


 


  


 


 


 


Net pension expense

  $14  $19  $28  $34   $14  $18  $42  $52 
  


 


 


 


  


 


 


 


 

6


During the threenine months ended DecemberMarch 31, 2003,2004, SunLink recognized curtailment losses of $31 for partial plan settlement of pension obligations to vested former employees.

 

6


SunLink contributed $89$490 to the plan in the sixnine months ended DecemberMarch 31, 20042005 and, expectsas determined by the requirements of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, does not expect to contribute anany additional $126amounts to the plan through the end of the fiscal year ending June 30, 2005, as required by2005.

Child Safety Segment- In January 2001, SunLink sold its European child safety subsidiary, Klippan Limited. During the Employee Retirement Income Security Actthree months ended March 31, 2004, SunLink was notified that a tax loss related to Klippan in the United Kingdom in the fiscal year it was sold was reduced and additional tax of 1974.$65 was owed. This expense is included in the results of discontinued operations for the three and nine months ended March 31, 2004.

 

Housewares Segment- SunLink sold its former U.K. subsidiary, Beldray Limited (“Beldray”), to a group of its managers in October 2001. Beldray has since entered into administrative receivership and is under the administration of its primary lender. SunLink believes Beldray ceased to operate in October 2004.

 

As previously disclosed, KRUG International U.K. Ltd.(“KRUG UK”), an inactive U.K. subsidiary of SunLink, entered into a guarantee, at a time when it owned Beldray, a U.K. manufacturing business (“the Beldray Guarantee”). The Beldray Guarantee covers Beldray’s obligations under a lease for a portion of Beldray’s manufacturing location. In October 2004, KRUG UK received correspondence from the landlord forof such facility that the rent payment of 94,000 British pounds ($181) for the fourth quarter of 2004 had not been paid by Beldray and requesting payment of such amount pursuant to KRUG UK’s guarantee.the Beldray Guarantee. In January 2005, KRUG UK received further correspondence from the landlord demanding two quarterly rent payments totaling 188,000 British pounds ($362) under the Beldray Guarantee. OnIn January 7, 2005, the landlord filed a petition in the High Court of Justice Chancery Division to wind up KRUG UK under the provisions of the Insolvency Act of 1986.1986 and KRUG UK was placed into involuntary liquidation by the High Court in February 2005.

 

SunLink’s non-current liability reserves for discontinued operations at DecemberMarch 31, 2004,2005, included $1,297$1,229 for a portion of such guarantee. Such reserve was based upon management’s estimate, after consultation with its property consultants and legal counsel, of the cost to satisfy the Beldray Guarantee in light of KRUG UK’s limited assets and before taking into account any other claims against KRUG UK. The maximum potential obligation of KRUG UK for rent under the Beldray Guarantee is estimated to be approximately $8,400. As a result of this claim and the U.K. liquidation proceedings against its inactiveKRUG UK, subsidiary,, SunLink expects KRUG UK to enter into administration orbe wound-up in liquidation in the UK.

 

Child Safety Segment– In January 2001, Bradley International Holdings Limited (Bradley), an inactive subsidiary of SunLink, sold its European child safety subsidiary, Klippan Limited (Klippan), to Newell Limited (Newell). Klippan was a guarantor of certain debt of Beldray when Klippan was a subsidiary of the Company. In August 2004, Bradley received a notice from Newell that Klippan had received a demand notice from a lender of Beldray to pay under the guarantee. As a result of the demand notice, in a letter dated October 12, 2004 to Bradley, Newell and Klippan claimed that Bradley has breached contractual warranties and/or misrepresentationsrepresentations under the 2001 sale agreement. Bradley has denied any liability, among other things, on the grounds that the 2001 sale agreement required all claims under warranties to be made on or before July 31, 2002 and no such claim was made.

 

7


Industrial Segment- In fiscal 1989, SunLink discontinued the operations of its industrial segment and subsequently disposed of substantially all related net assets. However, obligations may remain relating to product liability claims for products sold prior to the disposal.

 

Over the past fifteen years SunLink has discontinued operations carried on by its former industrial, U.K. leisure marine, life sciences and engineering, and European child safety segments, as well as the U.K. housewares segment. SunLink’s reserves relating to discontinued operations of these segments represent management’s best estimate of SunLink’s possible liability for property, product liability and other claims for which SunLink may incur liability. These estimates are based on management’s judgments, using currently available information, as

7


well as, in certain instances, consultation with its insurance carriers and legal counsel. While estimates have been based on the evaluation of available information, it is not possible to predict with certainty the ultimate outcome of many contingencies relating to discontinued operations. SunLink intends to adjust its estimates of the reserves as additional information is developed and evaluated. However, management believes that the final resolution of these contingencies will not have a material adverse impact on the financial position, cash flows or results of operations of SunLink.

 

Note 4. –Acquisition of HealthMont, Inc.

 

On October 3, 2003, SunLink completed the acquisition of HealthMont, a privately-held operator of community hospitals, through the merger of a wholly-owned subsidiary of SunLink with HealthMont. Upon the consummation of the transaction, SunLink acquired two community hospitals: Memorial Hospital of Adel, a 60-bed acute-care hospital in Adel, Georgia, which includes a 95-bed nursing home, and Callaway Community Hospital, a 49-bed acute-care hospital in Fulton, Missouri. The results of operations of HealthMont are included in the consolidated results of operations of the Company beginning October 3, 2003. The Company believes that the two HealthMont hospitals it acquired are compatible with its business strategy of operating rural and exurban community hospitals.

 

The following pro forma statements of earnings for the sixnine months ended DecemberMarch 31, 2003,2004, give effect to SunLink’s acquisition of HealthMont as if it had occurred as of July 1, 2002:

 

  

Pro forma

Six Months Ended

December 31,
2003


   

Pro forma
Nine Months Ended
March 31,

2004


 

Net revenues

  $58,769   $88,794 
  


  


Net loss

  $(3,080)  $(2,052)
  


  


Net loss per share:

      

basic

  $(0.54)

Basic

  $(0.35)
  


  


diluted

  $(0.54)

Diluted

  $(0.35)
  


  


 

8


Note 5. – Stock-Based Compensation

 

SunLink measures compensation costs for stock options issued to employees and directors using the intrinsic value-based method of accounting. Pro forma net earnings (loss) and net earnings (loss) per share amounts that would have resulted had compensation costs been determined using the fair value-based method are as follows:

 

  Three Months Ended
December 31,


 Six Months Ended
December 31,


   Three Months Ended
March 31,


  Nine Months Ended
March 31,


 
  2004

  2003

 2004

  2003

   2005

  2004

  2005

  2004

 

Net earnings (loss) as reported:

  $689  $(118) $998  $(1,208)  $2,439  $329  $3,437  $(879)

Less: total stock-based compensation determined under the fair value based method for all awards, net of income tax

   8   5   16   10 

Less: total stock-based compensation determined under the fair value-based method for all awards, net of income tax

   201   5   217   15 
  

  


 

  


  

  

  

  


Pro forma net earnings (loss)

  $681  $(123) $982  $(1,218)  $2,238  $324  $3,220  $(894)
  

  


 

  


  

  

  

  


Net earnings (loss) per share Attributable to common shareholders:

         

Net earnings (loss) per share attributable to common shareholders:

            

Basic:

                     

As reported

  $0.10  $(0.02) $0.14  $(0.21)  $0.34  $0.05  $0.48  $(0.15)
  

  


 

  


  

  

  

  


Pro forma

  $0.10  $(0.02) $0.14  $(0.21)  $0.31  $0.05  $0.45  $(0.15)
  

  


 

  


  

  

  

  


Diluted:

                     

As reported

  $0.09  $(0.02) $0.13  $(0.21)  $0.32  $0.05  $0.45  $(0.15)
  

  


 

  


  

  

  

  


Pro forma

  $0.09  $(0.02) $0.13  $(0.21)  $0.29  $0.05  $0.42  $(0.15)
  

  


 

  


  

  

  

  


 

Note 6. – Recent Accounting Pronouncements

 

In December 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Statement of Financial Accounting StandardStandards (“FAS”SFAS”) No. 153, “Exchanges of Nonmonetary Assets – an amendment of APB Opinion No. 29”. The guidance in Accounting Principles Board (“APB”) Opinion No. 29, Accounting for Nonmonetary Transactions”,is based on the principle that exchanges of nonmonetary assets should be measured based on the fair value of the assets exchanged. The guidance in that Opinion, however, included certain exceptions to that principle. SFAS No. 153 amends APB Opinion No. 29 to eliminate the exception for nonmonetary exchanges of similar productive assets and replaces it with a general exception for exchanges of nonmonetary assets that do not have commercial substance. A nonmonetary exchange has commercial substance if the future cash flows of the entity are expected to change significantly as a result of the exchange. This statement is effective for nonmonetary asset exchanges occurring in fiscal periods beginning after June 15, 2005. Its adoption by the Company should not have a material impact on the Company’s financial condition or results of operations.

 

In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 123 (revised 2004),“Share-Based Payment”.SFAS No. 123 (R) replaces SFAS No. 123,“Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation” and supersedes APB Opinion No. 25,“Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees”. SFAS No. 123 (R) establishes standards for the accounting for transactions in which an entity exchanges its equity instruments for goods or services. It also addresses transactions in which an entity incurs liability in exchange for goods or services that are based on the fair value of the entity’s equity instruments or that may be settled by the issuance of such equity instruments. This Statement focuses primarily on accounting for transactions in which an entity obtains employee services in

9


share-based payment transactions. This Statement does not change the accounting guidance for

9


share-based payment transactions with parties other than employees provided in SFAS No. 123 as originally issued and Emerging Issues Task Force Issue No. 96-18, “Accounting for Equity Instruments That Are Issued to Other Than Employees for Acquiring, or in Conjunction with, Selling, Good,Goods or Services.” This Statement does not address the accounting for employee share ownership plans, which are subject to AICPA Statement of Position 93-6,“Employers’ Accounting for Employee Stock Ownership Plans.Plans”.SFAS 123, as originally issued in 1995, established as preferable a fair-value-based method for accounting for share-based payment transactions with employees. However, that Statement permitted entities the option of continuing to apply the guidance of APB Opinion No. 25, as long as the footnotes to financial statements disclosed what net income would have been had the preferable fair-value-based method been used. Although those disclosures helped to mitigate the problems associated with accounting under APB Opinion No. 25, many investors and other users of financial statements said that the failure to include employee compensation costs in the income statement impaired transparency, comparability and creditabilitycredibility of financial statements. This statement is effective for the Company as of the first interim or annual reporting period that begins after June 15, 2005.of fiscal 2006. The effect of adoption of this standard by the Company on its financial condition orand results of operations is being evaluated.

 

In October 2004, the FASB ratified the consensuses of Emerging Issues Task Force Issue No. 04-8,The Effect of ContinentlyContingently Convertible Instruments on Diluted Earnings per Share.” This Issue addresses when contingently convertible instruments should be included in diluted earnings per share. For purposes of this issue,Issue, contingently convertible instruments are instruments that have embedded conversion rights that are contingently convertible or exercisable based on (a) a market price trigger or (b) multiple contingencies if one of the contingencies is a market price trigger and the instrument can be converted into or settled in shares based on meeting the specified market condition. A market price trigger is a market condition that is based at least in part on the issuer’s own share price. This Issue iswas effective for reporting periods ending after December 15, 2004. The adoption of this accounting treatment by the Company shoulddid not have a material impact on the Company’s reported diluted earnings per share.

 

In March 2005, the FASB published FASB Interpretation No. 47, “Accounting for Conditional Asset Retirement Obligations” Interpretation 47 will result in (a) more consistent recognition of liabilities relating to asset retirement obligations, (b) more information about expected future cash outflows associated with those obligations, and (c) more information about investments in long-lived assets because additional asset retirement costs will be recognized as part of the carrying amounts of the assets. Interpretation 47 clarifies that the term conditional asset retirement obligation as used in FASB Statement No. 143, “Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations”, refers to a legal obligation to perform an asset retirement activity in which the timing and (or) method of settlement are conditional on a future event that may or may not be within the control of the entity. The obligation to perform the asset retirement activity is unconditional even though uncertainty exists about the timing and (or) method of settlement. Uncertainty about the timing and (or) method of settlement of a conditional asset retirement obligation should be factored into the measurement of the liability when sufficient information exists. Interpretation 47 also clarifies when an entity would have sufficient information to reasonably estimate the fair value of an asset retirement obligation. Interpretation 47 is effective no later than the end of fiscal years ending after December 15, 2005. Its adoption by the Company should not have a material impact on the Company’s financial condition or results of operations.

10


Note 7. – Receivables- net

 

  December 31,
2004


 June 30,
2004


   March 31,
2005


 June 30,
2004


 

Patient accounts receivable (net of contractual allowances)

  $20,053  $18,623   $21,719  $18,623 

Less allowance for doubtful accounts

   (7,527)  (6,397)   (6,664)  (6,397)
  


 


  


 


Patient accounts receivable, net

   12,526   12,226    15,055   12,226 

Other accounts receivable

   580   142    142   142 
  


 


  


 


Receivables - net

  $13,106  $12,368   $15,197  $12,368 
  


 


  


 


 

Net revenues included reductionsincreases of $152$72 and an increase of $21$386 for the three months ended DecemberMarch 31, 20042005 and 2003,2004, respectively, for the settlements and filings of prior year Medicare and Medicaid cost reports. Net revenues included increases of $7$79 and $159$545 for the sixnine months ended DecemberMarch 31, 20042005 and 2003,2004, respectively, for the settlements and filings of prior year Medicare and Medicaid cost reports.

 

10


Note 8. – Long-Term Debt

 

  

December 31,

2004


 

June 30,

2004


   March 31,
2005


 June 30,
2004


 

SunLink Term Loan A

  $9,889    $9,722  $—   

HealthMont Term Note II

   $2,300     2,300 

HealthMont mortgage I

    2,674     2,674 

HealthMont mortgage II

    1,466     1,466 

Capital lease obligations

   448   952    411   952 
  


 


  


 


   10,337   7,392    10,133   7,392 

Less current maturities

   (840)  (826)   (840)  (826)
  


 


  


 


  $9,497  $6,566   $9,293  $6,566 
  


 


  


 


 

SunLink Credit Facility - On October 15, 2004, SunLink entered into a $30,000 five-year senior secured credit facility comprised of a revolving line of credit of up to $15,000 with an interest rate at LIBOR plus 2.91%, a $10,000 term loan (“SunLink Term Loan A”) with an interest rate at LIBOR plus 3.91% and a $5,000 term loan facility (“SunLink Term Loan B”) with an interest rate at LIBOR plus 3.91%. The revolving line of credit and the SunLink Term Loan A were immediately available to the Company as of October 15, 2004. The SunLink Term Loan B closed on November 15, 2004. The $10,000 SunLink Term Loan A and draws under the $5,000 SunLink Term Loan B are repayable based on a 15-year amortization from the date of draw with final balloon payments due at the end of the five-year maturity of the credit facility. The total availability under all components of the credit facility is keyed to the level of SunLink’s earnings, which would have provided for current total borrowing capacity at DecemberMarch 31, 20042005 of approximately $21,200.$24,400. As of DecemberMarch 31, 2004,2005, only the SunLink Term Loan A was drawn, of which $9,889$9,722 was outstanding. The proceeds were used to repay the HealthMont Term Note II, the HealthMont Mortgages and the HealthMont Revolving Loan in the approximate total amount of $7,700. SunLink may use the remaining funds from the initial draw and the funds available from the revolving line of credit for hospital capital projects and equipment purchases and for working capital needs. The Company expectsdoes not expect to begin using the revolving line of credit during the remainder of the fiscal year ending June 30, 2005. Borrowing under the $5,000 SunLink Term Loan B may be used, subject to satisfaction of certain covenants, to satisfy certain

11


claims or obligations with respect to discontinued operations, to fund acquisitions or to reacquire the Company’s securities. Costs and fees related to execution of the credit facility were $915.$916. The credit facility is being secured by the grant of a first priority security interest in all assets and properties, real and personal, of the Company and its consolidated domestic subsidiaries, including a pledge of all of the equity interests in such subsidiaries.

 

HealthMont Term Note II – On October 3, 2003, SunLink’s new HealthMont subsidiary borrowed the $2,300 at the closing of the HealthMont merger on October 3, 2003 through the sale of 15% notes due August 2005 (the “HealthMont Term NotesNote II”). This note was repaid early on October 15, 2004.

 

HealthMont Mortgage I – In connection with the merger with HealthMont on October 3, 2003, SunLink assumed a mortgage loan of $2,926 which bore interest at prime plus 2% and was payable in quarterly principal installments of $83 plus interest, with the remaining unpaid balance of $2,262 due on August 31, 2005. This mortgage was repaid early on October 15, 2004.

 

11


HealthMont Mortgage II– In connection with the merger with HealthMont on October 3, 2003, SunLink assumed a mortgage loan of $1,560 which bore interest at prime plus 2% and was payable in quarterly principal installments of $32 plus interest, with the remaining unpaid balance of $1,304 due on August 31, 2005. This mortgage was repaid early on October 15, 2004.

 

HealthMont Revolving Loan – In connection with the merger with HealthMont, SunLink assumed an $8,000 revolving loan agreement which SunLink guaranteed and which had borrowings of $2,807 at the merger date. The loan bore interest of prime plus 1.5% and the agreement would have expired August 31, 2005. This revolving loan was repaid on October 15, 2004.

 

Note 9. - Loss on Early Repayment of Debt

 

In October 2004, the Company repaid, from proceeds of the SunLink Credit Facility, the HealthMont Mortgages I and II (principal amounts of $4,025, due August 2005), the HealthMont Term Note II (principal amount of $2,300, due August 2005) and the HealthMont Revolving Loan ($1,289 outstanding at payment date). The early repayment resulted in a loss on early repayment of debt of $384. This loss is composed of $263 of unamortized prepaid debt costs related to the repaid debt instruments and a $121 penalty related to the early repayment of the HealthMont Revolving Loan.

 

Note 10. – Income Taxes

 

Income tax expense of $28 (all$176 ($201 federal taxes and $25 state taxes)benefit) and $97 (all$61 ($20 federal benefit and $81 state taxes) was recorded for the three months ended DecemberMarch 31, 20042005 and 2003,2004, respectively. Income tax expense of $116 (all$292 ($201 federal and $91 state taxes) and $126 (all$187 ($20 federal benefit and $207 state taxes) was recorded for the sixnine months ended DecemberMarch 31, 20042005 and 2003,2004, respectively. At DecemberMarch 31, 2004,2005, SunLink has provided a partial valuation allowance of the deferred tax asset so that the net domestic tax assets were $1,021 at December 31, 2004.$1,279. Based upon management’s assessment that it was more likely than not that a portion of its domestic deferred tax asset, primarily its domestic net operating losses subject to limitation, would not be recovered. Accordingly,recovered, the Company has established a valuation allowance for the portion of the domestic tax asset which may not be utilized. The Company has provided a valuation allowance for the entire amount of the foreign tax asset as it is more likely than not that none of the foreign deferred tax assets will be realized through future taxable income or implementation of tax planning strategies.

 

12


Note 11. - Comprehensive Earnings

 

Comprehensive earnings for SunLink include foreign currency translation adjustments. Total comprehensive earnings for the following periods were as follows:

 

  Three Months Ended

 Six Months Ended

   Three Months Ended

  Nine Months Ended

 
  

December 31,

2004


 

December 31,

2003


 December 31,
2004


 

December 31,

2003


   

March 31,

2005


 March 31,
2004


  

March 31,

2005


 

March 31,

2004


 

Net earnings (loss):

  $689  $(118) $998  $(1,208)  $2,439  $329  $3,437  $(879)

Other comprehensive income net of tax:

         

Change in equity due to :

         

Change in minimum pension liability

    111   111        111 

Foreign currency translation adjustments

   (123)  (62)  (123)  (64)   (21)  15   (144)  (49)
  


 


 


 


  


 

  


 


Comprehensive earnings (loss)

  $566  $(69) $875  $(1,161)  $2,418  $344  $3,293  $(817)
  


 


 


 


  


 

  


 


 

Note 12. - Commitments and Contingencies

 

As discussed in Note 3 – “Discontinued Operations”, SunLink sold its former U.K. subsidiary, Beldray Limited (“Beldray”), to a group of its managers in October 2001. Beldray has since entered into administrative receivership and is under the administration of its primary lender. SunLink believes Beldray ceased to operate in October 2004.

 

As previously disclosed, KRUG International U.K. Ltd.(“KRUG UK”), an inactive U.K. subsidiary of SunLink, entered into a guarantee, at a time when it owned Beldray, Limited, a U.K. manufacturing business (“the Beldray Guarantee”). The Beldray Guarantee covers Beldray’s obligations under a lease for a portion of Beldray’s manufacturing location. In October 2004, KRUG UK received correspondence from the landlord forof such facility that the rent payment of 94,000 British pounds ($181) for the fourth quarter of 2004 had not been paid by Beldray and requesting payment of such amount pursuant to KRUG UK’s guarantee.the Beldray Guarantee. In January 2005, KRUG UK received further correspondence from the landlord demanding two quarterly rent payments totaling 188,000 British pounds ($362) under the Beldray Guarantee. On January 7, 2005, the landlord filed a petition in the High Court of Justice Chancery Division to wind up KRUG UK under the provisions of the Insolvency Act of 1986.1986 and KRUG UK was placed into involuntary liquidation by the High Court in February 2005.

 

SunLink’s non-current liability reserves for discontinued operations at DecemberMarch 31, 2004,2005, included $1,297$1,229 for a portion of such guarantee.the Beldray Guarantee. Such reserve was based upon management’s estimate, after consultation with its property consultants and legal counsel, of the cost to satisfy the Beldray Guarantee in light of KRUG UK’s limited assets and before taking into account any other claims against KRUG UK. The maximum potential obligation of KRUG UK for rent under the Beldray Guarantee is estimated to be approximately $8,400. As a result of this claim and the U.K. liquidation proceedings against its inactiveKRUG UK, subsidiary, SunLink expects KRUG UK to enter into administration orbe wound-up in liquidation in the UK.

 

On November 3, 2004, SunLink received a demand letter with a current claim of $838 from a commercial leasing company demanding payment with respect to the remaining $1,323 of lease obligations under a master lease agreement entered into by HealthMont in July 2001, prior to its acquisition by SunLink. The

13


claim was for payment of equipment leases for the two HealthMont

13


facilities that SunLink currently owns and operates and two facilities that HealthMont sold prior to its acquisition by SunLink. SunLink recorded a reserve and expense of $300 for such claim at September 30, 2004. The claim was settled on December 31, 2004 for $602 and resulted in additional expense $21 wasof $321 recorded in the quarternine months ended DecemberMarch 31, 20042005. Because the amount of the claims alleged could constitute material indebtedness under the SunLink Credit Facility and could thereby give rise to an event of default, SunLink sought and obtained a waiver under the SunLink Credit Facility.

 

In April 2005, SunLink was named as one of a number of defendants in an environmental contamination lawsuit in California involving property owned by a company SunLink formerly had a minority ownership interest in. SunLink denies any liability related to the lawsuit and intends to vigorously defend itself against any attempts to impose liability on the Company in connection with this claim.

As of DecemberMarch 31, 2004,2005, SunLink had no material future commitments for capital expenditures. Subject to the availability of internally generated funds and other financing, SunLink expects to spend approximately $2,900$1,500 in capital expenditures during the remaining sixthree months of the fiscal year ending June 30, 2005, primarily for new and replacement equipment.

SunLink currently utilizes three different management information systems at our seven hospitals. Five hospitals utilize comprehensive systems designed for larger hospitals and two hospitals utilize a system designed for smaller hospitals. We are planning to convert our hospitals to a single management information system upon expiration of our existing software lease and support agreements which have unexpired terms of up to 18 months. This conversion will begin in the fourth fiscal quarter ending June 30, 2005 and is expected to be completed by September 30, 2006. The cost of the software, hardware, installation and training for the new management information systems is estimated to be $3,200, approximately $2,400 of which is expected to be capitalized and amortized over the useful life of the new system.

 

SunLink is a party to claims and litigation incidental to its business, as to which it is not currently possible to determine the ultimate liability, if any. Based on an evaluation of information currently available and consultation with legal counsel, management believes that resolution of such claims and litigation is not likely to have a material adverse effect on the financial position, cash flows or results of operations of SunLink.

 

Contractual Obligations, Commitments and Contingencies

 

Contractual obligations, commitments and contingencies related to long-term debt, non-cancelable operating leases and physician guarantees from continuing operations at DecemberMarch 31, 20042005 were as follows:

 

  

Long-Term

Debt


  

Operating

Leases


  

Physician

Guarantees


  Long-Term
Debt


  Operating
Leases


  Physician
Guarantees


Payments Due in:

         

Payments due in:

         

1 year

  $840  $1,743  $2,178  $840  $1,567  $1,886

2 years

   822   873   600   819   687   149

3 years

   781   507      752   472   

4 years

   672   393      667   368   

5 years

   7,222   304      7,055   283   

More than 5 years

      2,260         2,200   
  

  

  

  

  

  

  $10,337  $6,080  $2,778  $10,133  $5,577  $2,035
  

  

  

  

  

  

 

At DecemberMarch 31, 2004,2005, SunLink had contracts with 1112 physicians which contain guaranteed minimum gross receipts. SunLink expenses physician guarantees as they are determined to be due to the physician on an accrual basis. Each month the physician’s gross patient receipts are accumulated and the difference between the monthly guarantee and the physician’s actual gross receipts for the month is calculated. If the guarantee is greater than the receipts, the difference is accrued as a liability and an expense. The net guarantee amount is paid to the physician in the succeeding month. If the physician’s monthly receipts exceed the guarantee amount in subsequent months, then the overage is repaid to SunLink to the extent of any prior monthly guarantee

14


payments and the liability and expense is reduced by the amount of the repayments. SunLink expensed $633$439 and $736$620 for the three months ended DecemberMarch 31, 20042005 and 2003,2004, respectively, and expensed $1,314$1,753 and $1,343$1,963 for the sixnine months ended DecemberMarch 31, 20042005 and 2003,2004, respectively, for physician guarantees. The table above shows the maximum obligations SunLink had at DecemberMarch 31, 20042005 for the non-cancelable commitments under physician guarantee contracts.

 

1415


ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL

CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

(dollars in thousands, except per share and admissions data)

 

This Quarterly Report and the documents that are incorporated by reference in this Quarterly Report contain certain forward-looking statements within the meaning of the safe harbor for forward-looking statements contained in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward-looking statements include all statements that do not relate solely to historical or current facts and can be identified by the use of words such as “may,” “believe,” “will,” “expect,” “project,” “estimate,” “anticipate,” “plan” or “continue.” These forward-looking statements are based on current plans and expectations and are subject to a number of risks, uncertainties and other factors which could significantly affect current plans and expectations and our future financial condition and results. These factors, which could cause actual results, performance and achievements to differ materially from those anticipated, include, but are not limited to:

 

General Business Conditions

 

general economic and business conditions in the U.S., both nationwide and in the states in which we operate hospitals;

 

the competitive nature of the U.S. community hospitals business;

 

demographic changes in areas where we operate hospitals;

 

the availability of cash or borrowing to fund working capital, renovations and capital improvements at existing hospital facilities and for acquisitions;

 

changes in accounting principles generally accepted in the U.S.; and,

 

fluctuations in the market value of equity securities including SunLink common shares;

 

Operational Factors

 

the availability of, and our ability to attract and retain, sufficient qualified staff physicians, management and staff personnel for our hospital operations;

 

timeliness of reimbursement payments received under government programs;

 

restrictions imposed by debt agreements;

 

the cost and availability of insurance coverage including professional liability (e.g., medical malpractice) and general liability insurance;

 

the efforts of insurers, healthcare providers, and others to contain healthcare costs;

 

the impact on hospital services of the treatment of patients in lower acuity healthcare settings, whether with drug therapy or via alternative healthcare services;

 

changes in medical and other technology; and,

 

 increases in prices of materials and services utilized in our hospital operations;

 

Liabilities, Claims, Obligations and Other Matters

 

claims under leases, guarantees and other obligations relating to discontinued operations, including sold facilities, retained or acquired subsidiaries and former subsidiaries;

 

potential adverse consequences of known and unknown government investigations;

 

claims for product and environmental liabilities from continuing and discontinued operations;

 

professional, general and other claims which may be asserted against us:

 

Regulation and Governmental Activity

 

existing and proposed governmental budgetary constraints:constraints;

 

the regulatory environment for our businesses, including state certificate of need laws and regulations, rules and judicial cases relating thereto;

 

1516


anticipated adverse changes in the levels and terms of government (including Medicare, Medicaid and other programs) and private reimbursement for SunLink’s healthcare services including the payment arrangements and terms of managed care agreements;

 

changes in or failure to comply with Federal, state or local laws and regulations affecting the healthcare industry; and,

 

the possible enactment of Federal healthcare reform laws or reform laws in states where we operate hospital facilities (including Medicaid waivers and other reforms);

 

Acquisition Related Matters

 

our ability to integrate acquired hospitals and implement our business strategy;

 

other risk factors specific to individual transactions, such as and including those described in the registration statement we filed with respect to the issuance of our common shares in connection with the acquisition of HealthMont, and,

 

competition in the market for acquisitions of hospitals and healthcare facilities.

 

As a consequence, current plans, anticipated actions and future financial condition and results may differ from those expressed in any forward-looking statements made by or on behalf of SunLink. You are cautioned not to unduly rely on such forward-looking statements when evaluating the information presented in this Form 10-Q. We have not undertaken any obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements.

 

Corporate Business Strategy

 

SunLink is a provider of healthcare services through the operation of exurban and rural community hospitals in the United States. In February 2001, SunLink acquired its initial six hospitals and began healthcare operations. On October 3, 2003, SunLink acquired two additional hospitals from HealthMont, Inc. (“HealthMont”). On June 1, 2004, SunLink sold its Mountainside Medical Center (“Mountainside”), a 35-bed hospital located in Jasper, Georgia. Through its subsidiaries, SunLink operates a total of seven community hospitals in four states. Six of the hospitals are owned and one is leased. SunLink also operates certain related businesses, consisting primarily of nursing homes located adjacent to certain of its hospitals and home health agencies servicing areas around its hospitals. The healthcare operations comprise a single business segment: community hospitals. SunLink currently does not have operations in other business segments. SunLink’s hospitals are acute-care hospitals and have a total of 402 licensed beds.

 

SunLink’s business strategy is to focus its efforts on internal growth of its seven hospitals supplemented by growth from selected hospital acquisitions. During the sixnine months ended DecemberMarch 31, 2004,2005, SunLink concentrated its efforts on the operations and improvement of its existing hospitals. During the past year, SunLink has evaluated certain hospitals which were for sale and monitored selected hospitals which SunLink determined might become available for sale. SunLink continues to engage in similar evaluation and monitoring activities with respect to hospitals which are or may become available for acquisition.

 

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

 

In January 2002, the SEC issued disclosure guidance for “critical accounting policies.” The SEC defines “critical accounting policies” as those that require application of management’s most difficult, subjective or complex judgments, often as a result of the need to make estimates about the effect of matters that are inherently uncertain and may change in subsequent periods.

 

The following is not intended to be a comprehensive list of all of our accounting policies. In many cases, the accounting treatment of a particular transaction is specifically dictated by

 

1617


accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, with no need for management’s judgment in their application. There are also areas in which management’s judgment in selecting an available alternative would not produce a materially different result.

 

We have identified the following as accounting policies critical to us:

 

Management Estimates- The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Some of the more significant estimates made by management involve reserves for adjustments to net patient service revenues, evaluation of the recoverability of assets, including accounts receivable, and the assessment of litigation and contingencies, including income taxes and related tax asset valuation allowances and liabilities relating to discontinued operations, all as discussed in more detail in the remainder of this subsection. Actual results could differ materially from these estimates.

 

Net Patient Service Revenues– We have agreements with third-party payors that provide for payments at amounts different from established charges. Payment arrangements vary and include prospectively determined rates per discharge, reimbursed costs, discounted charges and per diem payments. Our patient service revenues are reported as services are rendered at the estimated net realizable amounts from patients, third-party payors and others. Estimated net realizable amounts are estimated based upon contracts with third-party payors, published reimbursement rates and historical reimbursement percentages pertaining to each payor type. Estimated reductions in revenues to reflect agreements with third-party payors and estimated retroactive adjustments under such reimbursement agreements are accrued during the period the related services are rendered and are adjusted in future periods as interim and final settlements are determined. Significant changes in reimbursement levels for services under government and private programs could significantly impact the estimates used to accrue such revenue deductions. At DecemberMarch 31, 2004,2005, there were no material claims or disputes with third-party payors.

 

Allowance for Doubtful Accounts –Substantially all of SunLink’s receivables result from providing healthcare services to hospital facility patients. Accounts receivable are reduced by an allowance for doubtful accounts estimated to become uncollectible in the future. The Company calculates an allowance percentage based generally upon its historical collection experience for each type of payor. The allowance amount is computed by applying allowance percentages to receivable amounts included in specific payor categories. Significant changes in reimbursement levels for services under government and private programs could significantly impact the estimates used to determine the allowance for doubtful accounts.

 

Risk Management– We are exposed to various risks of loss from medical malpractice and other claims and casualties; theft of, damage to, and destruction of assets; business interruption; errors and omissions; employee injuries and illnesses; natural disasters (including earthquakes); and employee health, dental and accident benefits. Commercial insurance coverage is purchased for a portion of claims arising from such matters. When, in our judgment, claims are sufficiently identified, a liability is accrued for estimated costs and losses under such claims.

 

In connection with the acquisition of six hospitals, we assumed responsibility for professional liability claims reported after the February 1, 2001 acquisition date and the previous owner retained responsibility for all known and filed claims prior to the acquisition date. We purchased claims-made commercial insurance for acts prior to and after the acquisition date. The recorded liability for professional liability risks includes an estimate of the liability for claims incurred prior to February 1, 2001, but reported after February 1, 2001, and for claims incurred after February 1, 2001. These amounts are based on actuarially determined amounts. On June 1,

 

1718


2004, SunLink sold Mountainside Medical Center, one of the six hospitals, but retained all liabilities and obligations arising from the Company’s operations prior to closing and purchased a 7-year, claims made, extended discovery period (tail) policy for professional liability.

 

By virtue of our acquisition of HealthMont and its two hospitals, we assumed responsibility for all professional liability claims for which HealthMont was, or is, liable. HealthMont had purchased claims-made commercial insurance for claims made prior to our acquisition and we have purchased claims-made commercial insurance for claims made after the acquisition. The recorded liability for professional liability risks includes an estimate of liability for claims assumed at the acquisition and for claims incurred after the acquisition. These amounts are based on actuarially determined amounts.

 

We self-insure for workers’ compensation and employee health risks. The estimated liability for workers’ compensation and employee health risks includes estimates of the ultimate costs for both reported claims and claims incurred but not reported. We accrue an estimate of losses resulting from workers’ compensation, employee health and professional liability claims to the extent they are not covered by insurance. These accruals are estimated quarterly based upon management’s review of claims reported, historical loss data and annual actuarial calculations of the liabilities.

 

We record a liability pertaining to pending litigation if it is probable a loss has been incurred and accrue the most likely amount of loss based on the information available. If no amount within the range of losses estimated from the information available is more likely than any other amount in the range of loss, the minimum amount in the range of loss is accrued. Because of uncertainties surrounding the nature of litigation and the ultimate liability to us, if any, we periodically revise our estimated losses as additional facts become known.

 

In connection with the acquisition of HealthMont, SunLink secured a claims made, extended discovery period (tail) policy with respect to HealthMont’s existing directors, officers and employment practices liability insurance policy for a term through August 31, 2005 because SunLink assumed responsibility for existing general and professional liability claims and claims reported after the acquisition date.

 

Goodwill and Other IntangiblesSunLink accounts for goodwill and intangible assets from business combinations in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets”. Goodwill represents the cost of acquired businesses in excess of the fair value of identifiable tangible and intangible net assets purchased. SFAS No. 142 recognizes that goodwill has an indefinite life and is not subject to periodic amortization. However, goodwill is tested at least annually for impairment, using a fair value methodology, in lieu of amortization. Definite-lived intangible assets, such as certificates of need, are amortized over their estimated useful lives, generally for periods ranging from 23 to 30 years. SunLink continually evaluates the reasonableness of the useful lives of intangible assets and they are tested for impairment as conditions warrant according to SFAS No. 144, “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-lived Assets”.

 

Income Taxes– We account for income taxes in accordance with SFAS No. 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes”.SFAS No. 109 requires an asset and liability approach and the recognition of deferred tax assets and liabilities for expected future tax consequences. SFAS No. 109 generally requires consideration of all expected future events other than proposed enactments of changes in the income tax law or rates.

 

Stock-Based Compensation - The Company measures compensation cost for share options issued to employees using the intrinsic value-based method of accounting. Effective July 1, 2005, the Company will adopt SFAS No. 123 (revised 2004)(R)“Share-Based Payment”which will require measuring compensation cost for share options using a fair-value-based method for employee stock options issued after and for non-vested employee stock options outstanding at the adoption date..date.

 

1819


Financial Summary

 

The results of continuing operations shown in the financial summary below are for our sole business segment, U.S. community hospital segmenthospitals, which is composed of five SunLink facilities acquired February 1, 2001 and the two HealthMont facilities acquired October 3, 2003.

 

  THREE MONTHS ENDED
December 31,


 

SIX MONTHS ENDED

December 31,


   

THREE MONTHS ENDED

March 31,


 

NINE MONTHS ENDED

March 31,


 
  2004

 2003

 % Change

 2004

 2003

 % Change

   2005

 2004

 % Change

 2005

 2004

 % Change

 

Net revenues

  $31,291  $30,179  3.7% $61,748  $51,441  20.0%  $33,893  $29,995  13.0% $95,641  $81,436  17.4%

Cost of patient service revenues

   (29,963)  (28,640) 4.6%  (59,702)  (49,693) 20.1%   (31,019)  (28,337) 9.5%  (90,721)  (78,030) 16.3%
  


 


 

 


 


 

  


 


 

 


 


 

Operating profit

   1,328   1,539  (13.7)%  2,046   1,748  17.0%   2,874   1,658  73.3%  4,920   3,406  44.5%

Loss on early debt repayment

   (384)  —    N/A   (384)  —    N/A    —     —    —     (384)  —    N/A 

Interest expense

   (276)  (1,271) 78.2%  (596)  (2,217) 73.1%   (253)  (1,199) (78.9)%  (849)  (3,416) (75.1)%

Interest income

   12   7  71.4%  25   10  150.0%   8   7  14.3%  33   17  94.1%
  


 


 

 


 


 

  


 


 

 


 


 

Earnings (Loss) from Continuing Operations before Income Taxes

  $680  $275  147.3% $1,091  $(459) NA 

Earnings from Continuing Operations before Income Taxes

  $2,629  $466  464.2% $3,720  $7  N/A 
  


 


 

 


 


 

  


 


 

 


 


 

Admissions

   2,479   2,612  (5.1)%  4,987   4,322  15.4%   2,923   2,826  3.4%  7,910   7,148  10.7%
  


 


 

 


 


 

  


 


 

 


 


 

Equivalent Admissions

   6,019   5,898  2.1%  12,324   10,268  20.0%   6,738   6,363  5.9%  19,062   16,631  14.6%
  


 


 

 


 


 

  


 


 

 


 


 

Surgeries

   1,255   1,098  14.3%  2,540   1,806  40.6%   1,294   1,158  11.7%  3,834   2,965  29.3%
  


 


 

 


 


 

  


 


 

 


 


 

Revenue per Equivalent Admission

  $5,199  $5,117  1.6% $5,010  $5,010  0.0%  $5,031  $4,714  6.7% $5,017  $4,897  2.5%
  


 


 

 


 


 

  


 


 

 


 


 

 

Equivalent admissions –Equivalent admissions is used by management (and certain investors) as a general measure of combined inpatient and outpatient volume. Equivalent admissions are computed by multiplying admissions (inpatient volume) by the sum of gross inpatient revenues and gross outpatient revenues and dividing the result by gross inpatient revenues. The equivalent admissions computation is intended to relate outpatient revenues to the volume measure (admissions) used to measure inpatient volume to result in a general approximation of combined inpatient and outpatient volume (equivalent admissions).

 

Results of Operations

 

Net revenues for the quarter ended DecemberMarch 31, 20042005 were $31,291$33,893 with a total of 6,0196,738 equivalent admissions and revenues per equivalent admission of $5,199$5,031 compared to net revenues of $30,179,$29,995, a total of 5,8986,363 equivalent admissions and revenues per equivalent admission of $5,117$4,714 for the quarter ended DecemberMarch 31, 2003.2004. The 3.7%13.0% increase in net revenues for the quarter ended DecemberMarch 31, 20042005 was due to a 2.1%5.9% increase in equivalent admissions and a 14.3%an 11.7% increase in surgeries. Net outpatient service revenues increased $1,373, an 11.6%$3,010, a 26.5% increase from last year to $13,235$14,348 for the three months ended DecemberMarch 31, 20042005 and increased to 42.3% of net revenues from 39.3%37.8% last year. Net revenues for the sixnine months ended DecemberMarch 31, 20042005 were $61,748$95,641 with a total of 12,32419,062 equivalent admissions and revenues per equivalent admission of $5,010$5,017 compared to net revenues of $51,441,$81,436, a total of 10,26816,631 equivalent admissions and

19


revenues per equivalent admission of $5,010$4,897 for the sixnine months ended DecemberMarch 31, 2003.2004. The 20.0 %

20


17.4% increase in net revenues for the sixnine months ended DecemberMarch 31, 20042005 was due to a 20.0%14.6% increase in equivalent admissions, a 40.629.3 % increase in surgeries and the acquisition of the two HealthMont facilities on October 3, 2003. Excluding the two HealthMont facilities, net revenues increased 4.9%7.1% resulting from a 3.1%4.6% increase in equivalent admissions and a 30.6%24.7% increase in surgeries. Net outpatient service revenues increased $5,197,$8,207, a 24.7%25.4% increase from last year to $26,227$40,575 for the sixnine months ended DecemberMarch 31, 20042005 and increased to 42.4% of net revenues from 40.9%39.8% last year. The increase in net outpatient service revenues is due primarily to a 35.3%22.9% increase in outpatient surgeries in the sixnine months ended DecemberMarch 31, 20042005 compared to the prior year’s sixnine months.

 

In addition to the HealthMont acquisition, we believe new doctors and, to a lesser degree, upgraded services and facilities and new doctors contributed to the increase in net revenues, admissions and equivalent admissions for the sixnine months ended DecemberMarch 31, 20042005 compared to the same period last year. We added 28 net new doctors during the year ended June 30, 2004 (not including the doctors added in the HealthMont acquisition) and 12 net new doctordoctors during the sixnine months ended DecemberMarch 31, 2004.2005. During the sixnine months ended DecemberMarch 31, 2004,2005, SunLink spent $1,314$1,753 on physician guaranteeguarantees and recruiting expenses compared to $1,343$1,963 for the same period last year. We also have expended approximately $1,192$4,177 for capital expenditures to upgrade services and facilities since July 1, 2004.2003. We continue to seek increased patient volume by further upgrading the services offered by the hospitals, by improving the hospitals’ physical facilities to assist our existing physicians and, as conditions warrant, by attracting additional physicians to our hospitals. The rate of physician recruiting has decreased this fiscal year relative to prior years as recruited physicians begin to establish and grow their practices. We anticipate that the majority of our recruited physicians in the remainder of the fiscal year will be associated with our HealthMont hospitals.

 

The following table sets forth the percentage of net patient revenues from major payor sources for the Company’s hospitals during the periods indicated:

 

  Three Months Ended
December 31,


 Six Months Ended
December 31,


   Three Months Ended
March 31,


 Nine Months Ended
March 31,


 
  2004

 2003

 2004

 2003

   2005

 2004

 2005

 2004

 

Source

      

Medicare

  46.0% 45.2% 45.6% 46.9%  47.9% 48.9% 46.4% 47.6%

Medicaid

  17.9% 17.0% 17.8% 17.2%  17.2% 16.7% 17.6% 17.0%

Self pay

  7.3% 7.7% 7.9% 7.9%  7.9% 7.0% 7.8% 7.6%

Commercial Insurance & Other

  28.8% 30.1% 28.7% 28.0%  27.0% 27.4% 28.2% 27.8%
  

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

  100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%  100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
  

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

The increase in netNet revenues of $1,112increased for all four payor classes for the three months ended DecemberMarch 31, 2004 was due to increased Medicare and Medicaid net revenues. Self pay and commercial insurance net revenues decreased slightly (0.1%) for the three months ended December 31, 20042005 compared to the prior year’s three months.comparable quarter last year. The decrease in Medicare as a percentage of net revenue for the sixnine months ended DecemberMarch 31, 20042005 is attributable to lower Medicare net revenues at the HealthMont hospitals, which were only owned for three months last year, compared to the SunLink hospitalshospitals’ Medicare net revenues as a percentage of net revenues.

 

Net revenues for the three months ended DecemberMarch 31, 2005 and 2004 included $391 and 2003 included $408 and $709$406 from a state indigent care program, respectively. Net revenues for the sixnine months ended DecemberMarch 31, 2005 and 2004 included $1,024 and 2003 included $633 and $709$1,115 from a state indigent care program, respectively.

 

20


Cost of patient service revenues, including depreciation, was $29,963$31,019 and $28,640$28,337 for the three months ended DecemberMarch 31, 20042005 and 2003,2004, respectively and $59,702$90,721 and $49,693$78,030 for the sixnine months ended DecemberMarch 31, 20042005 and 2003,2004, respectively.

 

   

Cost of Patient Service Revenue

As % of Net Revenues


 
   Three Months Ended
December 31,


  Six Months Ended
December 31,


 
   2004

  2003

  2004

  2003

 

Salaries, wages and benefits

  48.2% 46.6% 48.1% 47.0%

Provision for bad debts

  10.4% 10.4% 10.2% 11.7%

Supplies

  11.0% 11.3% 11.2% 11.6%

Purchased services

  5.9% 6.4% 5.8% 6.7%

Other operating expenses

  16.3% 15.9% 16.8% 15.4%

Rent and lease expense

  2.0% 2.4% 2.6% 2.5%

21


   

Cost of Patient Service Revenue

As% of Net Revenues


 
   Three Months Ended
March 31,


  Nine Months Ended
March 31,


 
   2005

  2004

  2005

  2004

 

Salaries, wages and benefits

  47.7% 49.5% 48.0% 47.9%

Provision for bad debts

  7.5% 7.6% 9.2% 10.2%

Supplies

  11.2% 11.8% 11.2% 11.7%

Purchased services

  5.8% 6.0% 5.8% 6.5%

Other operating expenses

  15.5% 15.6% 16.4% 15.4%

Rent and lease expense

  1.9% 2.3% 2.3% 2.5%

 

Salaries, wages and benefits expense increasedEach major classification decreased as a percentage of net revenues for the three and six months ended December 31, 2004 due to higher contract labor expense. The provision for bad debts was 10.4% of net revenues in the quarter ended December 31, 2004, unchanged from the prior year, and 10.2% for the six months ended December 31, 2004, a decrease of 1.5%. Forduring the three months ended DecemberMarch 31, 2004, a reclassification of $428 of indigent care expense from2005, due to the increased net revenues during the period. Provision for bad debt expense to reductionhas decreased as a percent of net revenues required by commencement of participation by one hospital in a state’s indigent care program resulted in a decrease of 1.2 percentage points of net revenues. Without this reclassification, bad debt as a percentage of net revenues for the second quarter ended December 31, 2004 would have increased from the prior year’s quarter by 1.2% of net revenues. The decrease in the six months ended December 31, 2004 compared to the prior year’s six month results partially resulted from reclassifying approximately $805 of indigent care expense from bad debt expense to reduction of net revenues required by commencement of participation by one hospital in a state’s indigent care program. Without this reclassification, bad debt expense would have been 11.3% of net revenues for the six months ended December 31, 2004, a decrease of 0.4 percentage points of net revenuesrevenue in the current year. The remainder of the decrease in the provision for bad debts for the current year’s six month results wasyear due to increased collections at all facilities.

improved up-front collection methods. The increase in other operating expenses as a percent of net revenue for the quarter and sixnine months of this year reflects an increase of $322 and $1,101 in insurance expense during the three and sixnine months ended DecemberMarch 31, 2004, respectively,2005 as compared to the prior year period due to higher premium costs and self-insured reserves. The increasedecrease in rent and lease expense as a percentage of net revenues in the first sixnine months of this year includeswas partially offset by $321 of expense for lease guarantees assumed in the HealthMont acquisition relating to leased property forat the facilities HealthMont owned prior to its acquisition by SunLink.

 

Depreciation and amortization expense increased $57$115 and $356$471 for the three and sixnine months ended DecemberMarch 31, 2004,2005, respectively, compared to the comparable prior year periods. The increase in the current year was due primarily to the October 3, 2003 acquisition of HealthMont which added two new facilities, as well as approximately $3,071$4,177 of capital expenditures in the past 1821 months.

 

Operating profit for the three months ended DecemberMarch 31, 20042005 was $1,328$2,874 or 4.2%8.5% of net revenues compared to $1,539$1,658 or 5.1%5.5% of net revenues for the three months ended DecemberMarch 31, 2003.2004. The decreaseincrease in operating profit as a percentage of net revenues was primarily attributable to higher contract labor and insurance expense. Higher contract labor cost was primarily attributable

21


to slower replacement of employed nurses at one of the Company’s facilities.net revenues. Operating profit for the sixnine months ended DecemberMarch 31, 20042005 was $2,046$4,920 or 3.3%5.1% of net revenues compared to $1,748$3,406 or 3.4%4.2% of net revenues for the sixnine months ended DecemberMarch 31, 2003.2004. The increase in operating profit for the current year’s sixnine months is attributable to the increased net revenues in the current year. The Company seeks to maintainManagement believes that the Company’s charges for comparable services may be less than certain of its servicescompetitors in certain markets which are comparable to chargesallow for services by other providers in its markets. The Company is currently seeking to implement price adjustments in such markets as it believes appropriate. However, there can be no assurance as to when any pricing adjustments may be implemented, if at all, and there likewise can be no assurances that the effect of any such price adjustments will be material or that any such adjustments can be sustained or that any increased revenue generated thereby will not be offset by increased costs in other areas.markets.

 

Interest expense was $276$253 and $1,271$1,199 for the three months ended DecemberMarch 31, 20042005 and 2003,2004, respectively. The decreased interest expense in the current year was due to decreased debt primarily resulting from the approximately $27,958 decrease in debt in the year ended June 30, 2004 (resulting primarily from the use of proceeds from the sale of Mountainside in June 2004) and the repayment of debt totaling $7,614 on October 15, 2004 from the proceeds fromof the SunLink Credit Facility Term Loan which had a lower interest rate ( 6.2%(6.6% at DecemberMarch 31, 2004)2005). Interest expense was $596$849 and $2,217$3,416 for the sixnine months ended DecemberMarch 31, 20042005 and 2003,2004, respectively.

 

In October 2004, the Company repaid the HealthMont Mortgages I and II (principal amounts totaling $4,025, due August 2005), the HealthMont Term Note II (principal amount of $2,300, due August 2005) and the HealthMont Revolving Loan ($1,289 outstanding at payment date). The early repayment resulted in a loss on early repayment of debt of $384. This loss is composed of $263 of unamortized prepaid debt costs related to the repaid debt instruments and a $121 penalty related to the early repayment of the HealthMont Revolving Loan.

 

22


Income tax expense of $28 (all$176 ($201 federal taxes and $25 state taxes)benefit) and $97 (all$61 ($20 federal benefit and $81 state taxes) was recorded for the three months ended DecemberMarch 31, 20042005 and 2003,2004, respectively. Income tax expense of $116 (all$292 ($201 federal and $91 state taxes) and $126 (all$187 ($20 federal benefit and $207 state taxes) was recorded for the sixnine months ended DecemberMarch 31, 20042005 and 2003,2004, respectively. At DecemberMarch 31, 2004,2005, SunLink has provided a partial valuation allowance of the deferred tax asset so that the net domestic tax assets were $1,021 at December 31, 2004.$1,279. Based upon management’s assessment that it was more likely than not that a portion of its domestic deferred tax asset, primarily its domestic net operating losses subject to limitation, would not be recovered. Accordingly,recovered, the Company has established a valuation allowance for the portion of the domestic tax asset which it estimates may not be utilized. The Company has provided a valuation allowance for the entire amount of the foreign tax asset as it is more likely than not that none of the foreign deferred tax assets will be realized through future taxable income or implementation of tax planning strategies.

 

Earnings from continuing operations of $652$2,453 ($0.080.32 per fully diluted share) in the quarter ended DecemberMarch 31, 20042005 compared to earnings from continuing operations of $178$405 ($0.030.06 per fully diluted share) in the comparable quarter last year. LowerIncreased operating profit and lower interest expense in the current year’s quarter resulted in the increased earnings from continuing operations in the current year. Earnings from continuing operations of $975$3,428 ($0.130.45 per fully diluted share) in the sixnine months ended DecemberMarch 31, 20042005 compared to a loss from continuing operations of $585$180 ($0.100.03 per fully diluted share) in the comparable period last year. Increased operating profit and lower interest expense in the current year’s quarteryear resulted in the earnings from continuing operations in the current year.operations. Net earnings of $689$2,439 ($0.090.32 per fully diluted share) in the quarter ended DecemberMarch 31, 20042005 compared to a net lossearnings of $118$329 ($0.020.05 per fully diluted share) in the quarter ended DecemberMarch 31, 2003.2004. Net earnings of $998$3,437 ($0.130.45 per fully diluted share) in the sixnine months ended DecemberMarch 31, 20042005 compared to a net loss of $1,208$879 ($0.210.15 per fully diluted share) in the sixnine months ended DecemberMarch 31, 2003.2004. The weight-averageweighted-average common shares used to calculate basic and diluted earnings (loss) per share has increased in the three and sixnine months ended DecemberMarch 31, 20042005 as compared to the prior year due to the 1,231 shares issued October 3, 2003 for the HealthMont acquisition and 753 shares purchased from warrant exercises during the period November 2003 to April 20042004.

 

22


Earnings before income taxes, interest, depreciation and amortization

 

Earnings before income taxes, interest, depreciation and amortization (“Ebitda”) represent the sum of income before income taxes, interest, depreciation and amortization. We understand that certain industry analysts and investors generally consider Ebitda to be one measure of the financial performance of a company, and it is presented to assist analysts and investors in analyzing the operating performance of a company and its ability to service debt. We believe increased Ebitda is an indicator of improved ability to service existing debt and to satisfy capital requirements. Ebitda, however, is not a measure of financial performance under accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and should not be considered an alternative to net income as a measure of operating performance or to cash liquidity. Because Ebitda is not a measure determined in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and is thus susceptible to varying calculations, Ebitda, as presented, may not be comparable to other similarly titled measures of other corporations.

 

23


Operating profit for the three and sixnine months ended DecemberMarch 31, 20042005 and 2003,2004, respectively, was as follows:

 

  Three Months Ended
December 31,


 Six Months Ended
December 31,


   Three Months Ended
March 31,


 Nine Months Ended
March 31,


 
  2004

 2003

 2004

 2003

   2005

 2004

 2005

 2004

 

SunLink hospitals Ebitda (5 hospitals)

  $2,802  $2,984  $5,046  $4,088   $3,536  $2,972  $8,582  $7,060 

HealthMont hospitals Ebitda (2 hospitals)

   211   (84)  299   (84)   1,114   217   1,413   133 

Corporate overhead costs

   (1,096)  (829)  (2,076)  (1,389)   (1,122)  (992)  (3,198)  (2,381)

Depreciation and amortization

   (589)  (532)  (1,223)  (867)   (654)  (539)  (1,877)  (1,406)
  


 


 


 


  


 


 


 


Operating profit

  $1,328  $1,539  $2,046  $1,748   $2,874  $1,658  $4,920  $3,406 
  


 


 


 


  


 


 


 


 

The SunLink hospitals include therefer to five existing hospitals acquired in February 2001 and the HealthMont hospitals refer to the two hospitals acquired in October 2003.

 

Liquidity and Capital Resources

 

We used $2,831$1,350 of cash in operating activities during the sixnine months ended DecemberMarch 31, 20042005 compared to $711$324 of cash used during the comparable period last year. The use of cash in the current year resulted primarily from $3,873$4,370 of income tax payments related to the gain on the sale of Mountainside in June 2004, $915 of capitalized expenses related to the SunLink Credit Facility and cash used for working capital (increased receivables and decreased accounts payable and accrued payroll and related taxes somewhat offset by increased third party payor settlementaccrued payroll and related tax liabilities and liabilities for professional liability risks), offset by cash generated from our $1,328$2,874 operating profit. Patient accounts receivable have increased during the nine months ended March 31, 2005 due to slowed Medicaid payments in Georgia and Missouri resulting from those states’ funding difficulties and the overall increase in net patient revenues.

 

We expended $1,192$2,298 for capital improvements at our hospitals during the sixnine months ended DecemberMarch 31, 2004.2005. We believe attractive and up to date physical facilities assist in recruiting quality staff and physicians, as well as attracting patients. Subject to the availability of internally generated funds and other financing, we expect to expend approximately $2,600$1,500 for capital expenditures during the remaining sixthree months of the fiscal year ending June 30, 2005.

 

On October 15, 2004, SunLink entered into a $30,000, five-year senior secured credit facility comprised of a revolving line of credit of up to $15,000 with an interest rate at LIBOR plus 2.91%, a $10,000 term loan with an interest rate at LIBOR plus 3.91% and a $5,000 term loan with an interest rate at LIBOR plus 3.91% (the “SunLink Credit Facility”). The revolving

23


line of credit,Only the $10,000 term loan and the $5,000 term loan are available to the Company for borrowing. At closing, only the $10,000 term loan washas been drawn, and $9,889of which $9,722 was outstanding at DecemberMarch 31, 2004.2005. The proceeds were used to repay the HealthMont Term Note II, the HealthMont Mortgages and the HealthMont Revolving Loan (HealthMont debt), all of which were payable on August 31, 2005, which used approximately $7,700 of the $10,000 term loan. SunLink expects to useis using the remaining funds from the initial draw and expects to use the funds available from the revolving line of credit for hospital capital projects, and equipment purchases and for working capital needs. The Company expectsdoes not expect to begin using the revolving line of credit during the fiscal year ending June 30, 2005. The $10,000 term loan and draws under the $5,000 term loan are repayable pursuant to a 15-year term amortization from the date of draw with final balloon payments due at the end of the five-year maturity of the SunLink Credit Facility. The total availability of credit under all components of the credit facility is keyed to the level of SunLink’s earnings which would have provided for current total borrowing capacity at DecemberMarch 31, 20042005 of approximately $21,200.$24,400. The early repayment of the HealthMont debt resulted in a loss of $384 from early repayment of debt in the quarter ending Decembernine months ended March 31, 2004.2005. Borrowing under the $5,000 term loan may be used, subject to satisfaction of certain covenants, to satisfy a portion of certain obligations with respect to

24


discontinued operations, to fund acquisitions (or a portion thereof) or to reacquire certain Company securities. Costs and fees related to execution of the SunLink Credit Facility were $915.$916. The SunLink Credit Facility is collateralized by the grant of a first priority security interest in all assets and properties, real and personal, of the Company and its consolidated domestic subsidiaries, including a pledge of all of the equity interests in such subsidiaries.

 

If SunLink or its applicable subsidiaries experience a material adverse change in their business, assets, financial condition, management or operations, or if the value of the collateral securing the SunLink Credit Facility decreases, we may be unable to draw on the credit facility.

 

We believe we have adequate financing and liquidity to support our current level of operations through the next twelve months. Our primary sources of liquidity are cash generated from continuing operations and availability under the SunLink Credit Facility. The total availability of credit under all components of the SunLink Credit Facility is keyed to the level of SunLink’s earnings, which, based upon the Company’s estimates, would provide for current borrowing capacity, before any draws, of approximately $24,400 at March 31, 2005, of which $9,722 was outstanding under a term loan. The current remaining availability of approximately $14,600 could be adversely affected by, among other things, lower earnings due to lower demand for our services by patients, change in patient mix and changes in terms and levels of government and private reimbursement for services. Cash generated from operations could be adversely affected by, among other things, lower patient demand for our services, higher operating costs (including, but not limited to, salaries, wages and benefits, provisions for bad debts, general liability and other insurance costs, cost of pharmaceutical drugs and other operating expenses) or by changes in terms and levels of government and private reimbursement for services, and the regulatory environment of the community hospital segment.

Contractual Obligations, Commitments and Contingencies

 

   

Long-Term

Debt


  

Operating

Leases


  

Physician

Guarantees


Payments Due in:

            

1 year

  $840  $1,743  $2,178

2 years

   822   873   600

3 years

   781   507    

4 years

   672   393    

5 years

   7,222   304    

More than 5 years

       2,260    
   

  

  

   $10,337  $6,080  $2,778
   

  

  

Contractual obligations, commitments and contingencies related to long-term debt, non-cancelable operating leases and physician guarantees from continuing operations at March 31, 2005 were as follows:

   Long-Term
Debt


  Operating
Leases


  Physician
Guarantees


Payments due in:

            

1 year

  $840  $1,567  $1,886

2 years

   819   687   149

3 years

   752   472    

4 years

   667   368    

5 years

   7,055   283    

More than 5 years

       2,200    
   

  

  

   $10,133  $5,577  $2,035
   

  

  

 

At DecemberMarch 31, 2004,2005, SunLink had contracts with 1112 physicians which contain guaranteed minimum gross receipts. SunLink expenses physician guarantees as they are determined to be due to the physician on an accrual basis. Each month the physician’s gross patient receipts are accumulated and the difference between the monthly guarantee and the physician’s actual gross receipts for the month is calculated. If the guarantee is greater than the receipts, the difference is accrued as a liability and an expense. The net guarantee amount is paid to the physician in the succeeding month. If the physician’s monthly receipts exceed the guarantee amount in subsequent months, then the overage is repaid to SunLink to the extent of any prior monthly guarantee payments and the liability and expense is reduced by the amount of the repayments. SunLink expensed $633$439 and $736$620 for the three months ended DecemberMarch 31, 20042005 and 2003,2004, respectively, and expensed $1,314$1,753 and $1,343$1,963 for the sixnine months ended DecemberMarch 31, 20042005 and 2003,2004, respectively, for physician guarantees. The table above shows the maximum obligations SunLink had at DecemberMarch 31, 20042005 for the non-cancelable commitments under physician guarantee contracts.

 

24In April 2005, SunLink was named as one of a number of defendants in an environmental contamination lawsuit in California involving property owned by a company SunLink formerly had a minority ownership interest in. SunLink denies any liability related to the lawsuit and intends to vigorously defend itself against any attempts to impose liability on the Company in connection with this claim.

25


At DecemberMarch 31, 2004,2005, we had outstanding long-term debt of $10,337$10,133 of which $9,889$9,722 was incurred in connection with the SunLink Credit Facility and $448$411 was related to capital leases.

 

Discontinued Operations

KRUG International U.K. Ltd. (“(“KRUG UK”), an inactive U.K. subsidiary of SunLink, entered into a guarantee, at a time when it owned Beldray Limited, a U.K. manufacturing business (“the Beldray Guarantee”). The Beldray Guarantee covers Beldray’s obligations under a lease for a portion of Beldray’s manufacturing location. In October 2004, KRUG UK received correspondence from the landlord forof such facility that the rent payment of 94,000 British pounds ($181) for the fourth quarter of 2004 had not been paid by Beldray and requesting payment of such amount pursuant to KRUG UK’s guarantee.the Beldray Guarantee. In January 2005, KRUG UK received further correspondence from the landlord demanding two quarterly rent payments totaling 188,000 British pounds ($362) under the Beldray Guarantee. On January 7, 2005, the landlord filed a petition in the High Court of Justice Chancery Division to wind up KRUG UK under the provisions of the Insolvency Act of 1986.1986 and KRUG UK was placed into involuntary liquidation by the High Court in February 2005.

 

SunLink’s non-current liability reserves for discontinued operations at DecemberMarch 31, 2004,2005, included $1,297$1,229 for a portion of such guarantee.the Beldray Guarantee. Such reserve was based upon management’s estimate, after consultation with its property consultants and legal counsel, of the cost to satisfy the Beldray Guarantee in light of KRUG UK’s limited assets and before taking into account any other claims against KRUG UK. The maximum potential obligation of KRUG UK for rent under the Beldray Guarantee is estimated to be approximately $8,400. As a result of this claim and the U.K. liquidation proceedings against its inactiveKRUG UK, subsidiary, SunLink expects KRUG UK such to enter into administration orbe wound-up in liquidation in the UK.

 

In January 2001, Bradley International Holdings Limited (“Bradley”), an inactive subsidiary of SunLink,KRUG UK, sold its European child safety subsidiary, Klippan Limited (“Klippan”) to Newell Limited (“Newell”). Klippan was a guarantor of certain debt of Beldray when it was a subsidiary of the Company. In August 2004, Bradley received a notice from Newell that Klippan had received a demand notice from a lender of Beldray to pay under the guarantee. As a result of the demand notice, in a letter dated October 12, 2004 to Bradley, Newell and Klippan claimed that Bradley has breached contractual warranties and/or misrepresentationsrepresentations under the 2001 sale agreement. Bradley has denied any liability on the grounds that the 2001 sale agreement required all claims under warranties to be made on or before July 31, 2002 and no such claim had been made.

 

On November 3, 2004, SunLink received a demand letter with a current claim of $838 from a commercial leasing company demanding payment with respect to the remaining $1,323 of lease obligations under a master lease agreement entered into by HealthMont in July 2001, prior to its acquisition by SunLink. The claim was for payment of equipment leases for the two HealthMont facilities that SunLink currently owns and operates and two facilities that HealthMont sold prior to its acquisition by SunLink. SunLink recorded a reserve and expense of $300 for such claim at September 30, 2004. The claim was settled on December 31, 2004 through the sale and assignment of the master lease to SunLink for $602, which settlement resulted in additional expense of $21$321 in the quarternine months ended DecemberMarch 31, 2004.2005. Because the amount of the claims alleged could constitute material indebtedness under the SunLink Credit Facility and could thereby give rise to an event of default, SunLink sought and obtained a waiver under the SunLink Credit Facility.

 

2526


We believe we have adequate financing and liquidity to support our current level of operations through the next twelve months. Our primary sources of liquidity are cash generated from continuing operations and availability under the SunLink Credit Facility. The total availability of credit under all components of the SunLink Credit Facility is keyed to the level of SunLink’s earnings, which, based upon the Company’s estimates, would provide for current borrowing capacity, before any draws, of approximately $21,200 at December 31, 2004, of which $9,889 was outstanding under a term loan. The current remaining availability of approximately $11,000 could be adversely affected by, among other things, lower earnings due to lower demand for our services by patients, change in patient mix, and changes in terms and levels of government and private reimbursement for services. Cash generated from operations could be adversely affected by, among other things, lower patient demand for our services, higher operating costs (including, but not limited to, salaries, wages and benefits, provisions for bad debts, general liability and other insurance costs, cost of pharmaceutical drugs and other operating expenses) or by changes in terms and levels of government and private reimbursement for services, and the regulatory environment of the community hospital segment.

SunLink is a party to claims and litigation incidental to its business, as to which it is not currently possible to determine the ultimate liability, if any. Based on an evaluation of information currently available and consultation with legal counsel, management believes that resolution of such claims and litigation is not likely to have a material adverse effect on the financial position, cash flows or results of operations of SunLink.

Sarbanes-Oxley Section 404

 

We are currently in the process of planning for the evaluation, documentation and testing of our internal control systems in order to permit our management to be in a position to report on, and our independent auditors to attest to, our internal controls over financial reporting as of June 30, 2006,2007, as required by Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (“Sarbanes-Oxley”). As a consequence, we anticipate incurring substantial additional expenses in the current and subsequent fiscal years as well as diverting substantial time of the Company’s management timeand Board of Directors to this task. While we currently are planning for timely completion of such documentation, testing and evaluation, there can be no assurance that we will be able to implement the requirements of Section 404 of Sarbanes-Oxley with adequate compliance by June 30, 2006.2007. Should we be unable to do so, we could be subjected to investigation by regulatory authorities, incur litigation costs and/or suffer loss of our AMEX listing. Any such actions could adversely affect our financial results and/or the market price of our common shares.

 

We have incurred limited incremental costs related to compliance with Sarbanes-Oxley during the sixnine months ended DecemberMarch 31, 2004.2005. We anticipate that these costs will increase and become significant in future periods. Specifically, the cost of compliance with the Sarbanes-Oxley requirements is expected to result in increased operating expenses during the remainder of the fiscal year endedending June 30, 2005 and subsequent fiscal years. Although we do not currently have specific estimates of these costs, the cost of the initial implementation as well as on-going compliance with Section 404 could be particularly high for the Company due to its decentralized management structure and the fact that three different management information systems are in use among our seven hospitals.

 

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

 

In December 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (“FAS”SFAS”) No. 153, “Exchanges of Nonmonetary Assets – an amendment of APB Opinion No. 29”. The guidance in Accounting Principles Board (“APB”) Opinion No. 29 ‘29”Accounting for Nonmonetary Transactions”,is based on the principle that exchanges of nonmonetary assets should be measured based on the fair value of the assets exchanged. The guidance in that Opinion, however, included certain exceptions to that principle. SFAS No. 153 amends APB Opinion No. 29 to eliminate the exception for nonmonetary exchanges of similar productive assets and replaces it with a general exception for exchanges of nonmonetary assets that do not have commercial substance. A nonmonetary exchange has commercial substance if the future cash flows of the entity are expected to change significantly as a result of the exchange. This statement is effective for nonmonetary asset exchanges occurring in fiscal periods beginning after June 15, 20053.2005. Its adoption by the Company should not have a material impact on the Company’s financial condition or results of operations.

 

In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 123 (revised 2004)(R),“Share-Based Payment”.SFAS No. 123 (R) replaces SFAS No. 123,“Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation” and supersedes APB Opinion No. 25,“Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees”. SFAS No. 123 (R) establishes standards for the accounting for transactions in which an entity exchanges its equity instruments for goods or services. It also addresses transactions in which an entity incurs liability in exchange for goods or services that are based on the fair value of the entity’s equity instruments or that may be settled by the issuance of such equity instruments. This Statement focuses primarily on accounting for transactions in which an entity obtains employee services in share-based payment transactions. This Statement does not change the accounting guidance for share-based payment transactions with parties other than employees provided in SFAS No. 123 as originally issued and Emerging Issues Task Force Issue No. 96-18.Accounting for Equity Instruments That Are Issued to Other Than Employees for Acquiring or in Conjunction with

27


Selling, Good or Services.” This Statement does not address the accounting for employee share ownership plans, which are subject to AICPA Statement of Position 93-6,“Employers’ Accounting for Employee Stock Ownership Plans.Plans”.SFAS 123, as originally issued in 1995, established as preferable a fair-value-based method for accounting for share-based payment transactions with employees. However, that Statement permitted entities the

26


option of continuing to apply the guidance of APB Opinion No. 25, as long as the footnotes to financial statements disclosed what net income would have been had the preferable fair-value-based method been used. Although those disclosures helped to mitigate the problems associated with accounting under APB Opinion No. 25, many investors and other users of financial statements said that the failure to include employee compensation costs in the income statement impaired transparency, comparability and creditability of financial statements. This statement is effective for the Company as of the first interim or annual reporting period that begins after June 15, 2005.of fiscal 2006. The effect of adoption of this standard by the Company’s on its financial condition orand results of operations is being evaluated.

 

In October 2004, the FASB ratified the consensuses of Emerging Issues Task Force Issue No. 04-8,No.04-8,The Effect of ContinentlyContingently Convertible Instruments on Diluted Earnings per Share.” This Issue addresses when contingently convertible instruments should be included in diluted earnings per share. For purposes of this issue,Issue, contingently convertible instruments are instruments that have embedded conversion rights that are contingently convertible or exercisable based on (a) a market price trigger or (b) multiple contingencies if one of the contingencies is a market price trigger and the instrument can be converted into or settled in shares based on meeting the specified market condition. A market price trigger is a market condition that is based at least in part on the issuer’s own share price. This Issue iswas effective for reporting periods ending after December 15, 2004. The adoption of this accounting treatment by the Company shoulddid not have a material impact on the Company’s reported diluted earnings per share.

In March 2005, the FASB published FASB Interpretation No.47,”Accounting for Conditional Asset Retirement Obligations”. Interpretation 47 will result in (a) more consistent recognition of liabilities relating to asset retirement obligations, (b) more information about expected future cash outflows associated with those obligations, and (c) more information about investments in long-lived assets because additional asset retirement costs will be recognized as part of the carrying amounts of the assets. Interpretation 47 clarifies that the term conditional asset retirement obligation as used in FASB Statement No. 143, “Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations”, refers to a legal obligation to perform an asset retirement activity in which the timing and (or) method of settlement are conditional on a future event that may or may not be within the control of the entity. The obligation to perform the asset retirement activity is unconditional even though uncertainty exists about the timing and (or) method of settlement. Uncertainty about the timing and (or) method of settlement of a conditional asset retirement obligation should be factored into the measurement of the liability when sufficient information exists. Interpretation 47 also clarifies when an entity would have sufficient information to reasonably estimate the fair value of an asset retirement obligation. Interpretation 47 is effective no later than the end of fiscal years ending after December 15, 2005. Its adoption by the Company should not have a material impact on the Company’s financial condition or results of operations.

 

Related Party Transactions

 

A director of the Company and our company secretary (who was a director of SunLink until November 2003 and is now a director emeritus) are members of two different law firms, each of whomwhich provide services to SunLink. The Company has paid an aggregate of $249$92 and $483$575 for legal services to these law firms in the three and sixnine months ended DecemberMarch 31, 2004,2005, respectively. Another director received $3 during the sixnine months ended DecemberMarch 31, 20042005 as fees for being a letter of credit obligor for up to $200 of SunLink’s revolving credit loans assumed in the HealthMont acquisition. The letter of credit obligation expired in September 2004.

28


ITEM 2. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

In April 2005, SunLink Health Systems, Inc. received a copy of a lawsuit captionedGloria Austin, et. al v. Wyle Laboratories, Inc, et. al, Case No. RIC424607 pending in the Riverside County, California Superior Court. Such lawsuit names Wyle Laboratories, Inc. (“Wyle”) and a variety of other defendants, including SunLink under its former name of KRUG International Corp. (“KRUG”) and two former subsidiaries of KRUG: KRUG Life Sciences, Inc. and Technology/Scientific Services, Inc. The lawsuit on behalf of approximately 85 individual plaintiffs and alleges personal injury, property damage, and other claims related thereto arising out of environmental contamination at a 429 acre former defense and aerospace facility of Wyle located in Norco, California (the “Facility”) which SunLink believes Wyle operated from the late 1950s to 2004. Wyle’s activities are alleged to have resulted in the release of hazardous chemicals into the soil and groundwater on the site, and migration of contaminants from such Facility to adjacent residential areas. Based on published reports, Wyle sold the Facility to a real estate development company in 2003, which is seeking to develop approximately 300 homes on the Facility site.

In 2004, the United States Environmental Protection Agency determined that pollution levels at the former Wyle Facility were sufficient to qualify the site for the U.S. Superfund list, but declined to place the site on such list because clean-up of the site is being overseen by California regulators.

Wyle is paying for testing and cleanup on the site under the supervision of the California Department of Toxic Substance Control. Based on published reports Wyle has agreed with California regulators to locate and clean up all contamination from the site and, at April 2005, had expended approximately $1,000 on environmental remediation and clean-up. Also based on published reports, California environmental officials have stated that their findings show no imminent health danger to the community and minimal long-term health concerns.

Without specific elaboration, plaintiff’s complaint alleges that KRUG “owned and or/operated the Facility.” At no time did KRUG or its former subsidiaries own or operate the Facility or control, or have the ability to control, the operations of Wyle. Furthermore, in a published news report, a spokesperson for Wyle has stated that no leaks of at least two of the identified contaminates—perchlorate and jet fuel—have occurred since 1997.

In March 1998, KRUG sold its KRUG Life Sciences, Inc. and Technology/Scientific Services, Inc. subsidiaries to Wyle in a transaction in which such former subsidiaries were merged into Wyle. In consideration, KRUG received Series A and Series B Preferred Stock of Wyle and approximately $3,000 in cash. As part of the sale, Wyle also assumed approximately $3,300 of the debt of the former subsidiaries. The Wyle Series A Preferred Stock was convertible into common stock of Wyle and voted with the Wyle common stock on an as-converted basis. As a result of the transaction, KRUG owned approximately 38% of the Wyle common stock on an as-converted basis. KRUG also became a party to an amended stockholders agreement entitling it, among other things, to elect two of Wyle’s seven directors and obligating it to vote its shares in favor of the nominees of the other parties to the agreement, which included Wyle’s management and an investment capital firm. In November 1999, KRUG sold the Wyle Series A Preferred Stock back to Wyle for approximately $4,125 in cash and exchanged the Wyle Series B Preferred Stock for preferred stock of LTS Holdings., Inc., a new holding company for Wyle formed as part of a financial recapitalization of Wyle. In November 2001, SunLink sold such LTS preferred stock back to LTS Holdings, Inc. for $850. At such time, KRUG’s two designated directors, each of whom was then a member of SunLink’s board of directors, resigned from the board of directors of Wyle.

29


SunLink denies that it has any liability whatsoever to theAustin plaintiffs or in connection with any acts or omissions by Wyle and intends to vigorously defend against any attempt to impose liability on SunLink in connection with the plaintiffs’ claims. While the ultimate outcome and materiality of the proceedings cannot presently be determined, in management’s opinion theAustin proceeding will not have a material adverse effect on SunLink’s financial condition or results of operations.

SunLink is a party to claims and litigation incidental to its business, as to which it is not currently possible to determine the ultimate liability, if any. Based on an evaluation of information currently available and consultation with legal counsel, management believes that resolution of such claims and litigation is not likely to have a material adverse effect on the financial position, cash flows or results of operations of SunLink.

 

ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

 

We are exposed to interest rate changes, primarily as a result of borrowing under our new credit facility completed in October 2004. Borrowings of $9,889$9,722 at DecemberMarch 31, 20042005 were refinanced by the new credit facility with debt at interest rates based upon LIBOR. A one percent change in the LIBOR rate would result in a change in interest expense of $99$98 on an annual basis. No action has been taken to mitigate our exposure to interest rate market risk and we are not a party to any interest rate market risk management activities.

 

ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

 

 a)Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures – Our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer, after evaluating the effectiveness of the Company’s “disclosure controls and procedures” (as such term is defined in the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, Rules 13a-14 and 15-d-14) as of DecemberMarch 31, 20042005 (the “Evaluation Date”), have concluded that, as of the Evaluation Date, our disclosure controls and procedures were adequate and designed to ensure that material information relating to us and our consolidated subsidiaries would be made known to them by others within those entities.

 

27


 b)Changes in internal controls – There were no significant changes in our internal controls or, to our knowledge, in other factors that could significantly affect our disclosure controls and procedures subsequent to DecemberMarch 31, 2004.2005.

 

2830


PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

 

Items required under Part II not specifically shown below are not applicable.

ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS

On November 8, 2004 and adjourned to November 19, 2004 and November 30, 2004, the Company held its Annual Meeting of Shareholders. At the meeting, three directors, Karen B. Brenner, C. Michael Ford and Howard E. Turner were elected to two year terms expiring at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders in 2006. Two separate proposals to amend and restate the Company’s Code of Regulation, a proposal regarding Number of Directors and Term of Office and a second proposal regarding Advance Notice of Shareholder Nominations, while receiving majorities of votes in favor, did not receive the two-thirds majorities needed for adoption and therefore were not adopted. 6,048,759 votes were voted in favor of electing Ms. Brenner and 456,112 votes were withheld. 6,048,759 votes were voted in favor of electing Mr. Ford and 456,112 votes were withheld. 6,048,669 votes were voted in favor of electing Mr. Turner and 456,202 votes were withheld. The proposal regarding Number of Directors and Term of Office received 4,016,078 votes in favor of adopting the proposal, 121,891 votes against and 57,879 votes abstaining. The proposal regarding Advance Notice of Shareholder Nominations received 3,716,453 votes in favor of adopting the proposal, 456,849 votes against and 25,546 votes abstaining.

 

ITEM 6. EXHIBITS

 

Exhibits:

Exhibits:

31.1  Chief Executive Officer’s Certification Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
31.2  Chief Financial Officer’s Certification Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
32.1  Chief Executive Officer’s Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.2  Chief Financial Officer’s Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

 

2931


SIGNATURES

 

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, SunLink Health Systems, Inc. has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

 

SunLink Health Systems, Inc.
By: 

/s/ Mark J. Stockslager


  Mark J. Stockslager
  Principal Accounting Officer

 

Dated: February 9,May 6, 2005

 

3032