Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes¨ No x

The number of shares outstanding of the registrant’s common stock as of ~~July~~October 31, 2006 was ~~493,108,492.~~454,969,467.


	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,						Three Months Ended September 30,						Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2006			2005			2006			2005			2006			2005			2006			2005
Net Sales	$	6,270		$	5,860		$	12,333		$	11,817		$	5,867		$	5,925		$	18,107		$	17,650

Costs and Expenses
Cost of products sold		4,666			4,359			9,241			8,774			4,335			4,444			13,513			13,162
Selling and administrative expenses		476			462			966			956			471			459			1,431			1,408
Depreciation, amortization and cost of timber harvested		305			333			644			673			308			339			944			1,005
Distribution expenses		305			259			617			518			291			261			905			776
Taxes other than payroll and income taxes		59			55			115			116			55			58			171			174
Restructuring and other charges		54			31			100			55			92			70			192			125
Insurance recoveries		—			(35	)		(19	)		(35	)		—			(188	)		(19	)		(223	)
Net (gains) losses on sales and impairments of businesses held for sale		75			(19	)		1,358			60
Net (gains) losses on sales and impairments of businesses														(110	)		5			1,248			65
Reversal of reserves no longer required, net														—			(3	)		—			(3	)
Interest expense, net		148			155			296			323			144			121			441			444

Earnings (Loss) From Continuing Operations Before Income Taxes and Minority Interest		182			260			(985	)		377			281			359			(719	)		717
Income tax provision		61			166			69			174			163			(377	)		227			(210	)
Minority interest expense, net of taxes		5			3			9			5			5			3			14			8

Earnings (Loss) From Continuing Operations		116			91			(1,063	)		198			113			733			(960	)		919
Discontinued operations, net of taxes and minority interest		(1	)		(14	)		(59	)		(44	)		88			290			39			258

Net Earnings (Loss)	$	115		$	77		$	(1,122	)	$	154		$	201		$	1,023		$	(921	)	$	1,177

Basic Earnings (Loss) Per Common Share
Earnings (loss) from continuing operations	$	0.24		$	0.19		$	(2.19	)	$	0.41		$	0.23		$	1.51		$	(1.98	)	$	1.89
Discontinued operations		—			(0.03	)		(0.12	)		(0.09	)		0.19			0.59			0.08			0.53

Net earnings (loss)	$	0.24		$	0.16		$	(2.31	)	$	0.32		$	0.42		$	2.10		$	(1.90	)	$	2.42

Diluted Earnings (Loss) Per Common Share
Earnings (loss) from continuing operations	$	0.24		$	0.19		$	(2.19	)	$	0.41		$	0.23		$	1.46		$	(1.98	)	$	1.85
Discontinued operations		—			(0.03	)		(0.12	)		(0.09	)		0.19			0.57			0.08			0.51

Net earnings (loss)	$	0.24		$	0.16		$	(2.31	)	$	0.32		$	0.42		$	2.03		$	(1.90	)	$	2.36

Average Shares of Common Stock Outstanding - assuming dilution		487.2			487.4			486.6			488.0			484.9			507.1			485.2			507.5

Cash Dividends Per Common Share	$	0.25		$	0.25		$	0.50		$	0.50		$	0.25		$	0.25		$	0.75		$	0.75


	June 30, 2006			December 31, 2005			September 30, 2006			December 31, 2005
Assets
Current Assets
Cash and temporary investments	$	274		$	1,641		$	736		$	1,641
Accounts and notes receivable, net		2,987			2,796			3,048			2,750
Inventories		2,334			2,310			2,306			2,287
Assets of businesses held for sale		1,661			3,002			270			3,321
Deferred income tax assets		307			279			288			279
Other current assets		158			113			136			110

Total Current Assets		7,721			10,141			6,784			10,388

Plants, Properties and Equipment, net		10,248			10,297			9,992			10,137
Forestlands		484			2,190			357			2,127
Forestlands Held for Sale		1,666			—			1,575			—
Investments		618			625			648			625
Goodwill		3,862			3,838			3,661			3,838
Deferred Charges and Other Assets		1,555			1,680			1,672			1,656

Total Assets	$	26,154		$	28,771		$	24,689		$	28,771

Liabilities and Common Shareholders’ Equity
Current Liabilities
Notes payable and current maturities of long-term debt	$	1,774		$	1,181		$	1,399		$	1,181
Accounts payable		1,998			1,981			2,000			1,967
Accrued payroll and benefits		385			399			401			396
Liabilities of businesses held for sale		216			195			98			238
Other accrued liabilities		1,212			1,103			1,137			1,094

Total Current Liabilities		5,585			4,859			5,035			4,876

Long-Term Debt		9,038			11,023			9,051			11,023
Deferred Income Taxes		377			726			754			711
Other Liabilities		3,853			3,601			3,790			3,599
Minority Interest		200			211			185			211
Common Shareholders’ Equity
Common stock, $1 par value, 493.1 shares in 2006 and 490.5 shares in 2005		493			491
Common stock, $1 par value, 493.3 shares in 2006 and 490.5 shares in 2005								494			491
Paid-in capital		6,642			6,627			6,710			6,627
Retained earnings		1,803			3,172			1,879			3,172
Accumulated other comprehensive loss		(1,837	)		(1,935	)		(1,817	)		(1,935	)

		7,101			8,355			7,266			8,355
Less: Common stock held in treasury, at cost, 2005 - 0.1 shares		—			4
Less: Common stock held in treasury, at cost, 2006 - 38.5 shares; 2005 - 0.1 shares								1,392			4

Total Common Shareholders’ Equity		7,101			8,351			5,874			8,351

Total Liabilities and Common Shareholders’ Equity	$	26,154		$	28,771		$	24,689		$	28,771


	Six Months Ended June 30,						Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2006			2005			2006			2005
Operating Activities
Net (loss) earnings	$	(1,122	)	$	154		$	(921	)	$	1,177
Discontinued operations, net of taxes and minority interest		59			44			(39	)		(258	)

Earnings from continuing operations		(1,063	)		198
Net (loss) earnings from continuing operations								(960	)		919
Depreciation and amortization		644			673			944			1,005
Deferred income tax expense, net		11			80
Deferred income tax expense								132			139
Tax benefit - non-cash settlement of IRS audits								—			(553	)
Restructuring and other charges		100			55			192			125
Payments related to restructuring and legal reserves		(41	)		(90	)		(65	)		(133	)
Insurance recoveries		(19	)		(35	)		(19	)		(223	)
Reversal of reserves no longer required, net								—			(3	)
Net losses on sales and impairments of businesses held for sale		1,358			60			1,248			65
Periodic pension expense, net		189			122			283			182
Other, net		175			47			145			167
Changes in current assets and liabilities
Accounts and notes receivable		(110	)		(70	)		(164	)		(91	)
Inventories		(21	)		(116	)		(31	)		(25	)
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities		(254	)		(227	)		90			(609	)
Other		(104	)		(154	)		(201	)		(56	)

Cash provided by operations - continuing operations		865			543			1,594			909
Cash provided by operations - discontinued operations		7			36			44			47

Cash Provided by Operations		872			579			1,638			956

Investment Activities
Invested in capital projects		(501	)		(487	)		(802	)		(756	)
Acquisitions, net of cash acquired								—			(39	)
Proceeds from divestitures		—			280			2,163			1,440
Other		(63	)		33			(241	)		63

Cash used for investment activities - continuing operations		(564	)		(174	)
Cash provided by investment activities - continuing operations								1,120			708
Cash used for investment activities - discontinued operations		(3	)		(206	)		(19	)		(219	)

Cash Used for Investment Activities		(567	)		(380	)
Cash Provided by Investment Activities								1,101			489

Financing Activities
Issuance of common stock		21			19			26			20
Repurchase of common stock								(1,385	)		—
Issuance of debt		522			322			1,259			278
Reduction of debt		(1,958	)		(1,368	)		(3,156	)		(2,543	)
Change in book overdrafts		(23	)		1			(50	)		(30	)
Dividends paid		(247	)		(246	)		(372	)		(368	)
Other		(5	)		(18	)		(3	)		(44	)

Cash used for financing activities - continuing operations		(1,690	)		(1,290	)		(3,681	)		(2,687	)
Cash used for financing activities - discontinued operations		—			(155	)		22			(172	)

Cash Used for Financing Activities		(1,690	)		(1,445	)		(3,659	)		(2,859	)

Effect of Exchange Rate Changes on Cash - Continuing Operations		18			(98	)		14			(85	)
Effect of Exchange Rate Changes on Cash - Discontinued Operations		—			(1	)		1			(5	)

Change in Cash and Temporary Investments		(1,367	)		(1,345	)		(905	)		(1,504	)
Cash and Temporary Investments
Beginning of the period		1,641			2,596			1,641			2,596

End of the period		274			1,251			736			1,092
Less - Cash, End of Period - Discontinued Operations		—			(114	)		—			—

Cash, End of Period - Continuing Operations	$	274		$	1,137		$	736		$	1,092

The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with the instructions to Form 10-Q and, in the opinion of Management, include all adjustments that are necessary for the fair presentation of ~~the Company’s~~International Paper’s (the Company) financial position, results of operations, and cash flows for the interim periods presented. Except as disclosed in these Condensed Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, such adjustments are of a normal, recurring nature. Results for the first ~~six~~nine months of the year may not necessarily be indicative of full year results. ~~These~~It is suggested that these consolidated financial statements ~~should~~ be read in conjunction with the audited financial statements and the notes thereto included in International Paper’s ~~(the Company)~~ Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005, and in International Paper’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on August 14, 2006 to update the historical financial statements included in the Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005, as amended by Form 10-K/A, to reflect that the Company’s Kraft Papers business is treated as a discontinued operation (collectively the “2005 10-K”), both of which ~~has~~have previously been filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

See Note 10 for required pro forma and additional disclosures related to stock-based compensation awards.

Prior-year amounts have been restated to present the Company’s Kraft Papers ~~business~~and Brazilian Coated Papers businesses as a discontinued ~~operation~~operations (see Note 4).

Earnings per common share from continuing operations are computed by dividing earnings from continuing operations by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding. Earnings per common share from continuing operations, assuming dilution, are computed assuming that all potentially dilutive securities, including “in-the-money” stock options, are converted into common shares at the beginning of each period. In addition, the computation of diluted earnings per share reflects the inclusion of contingently convertible securities in periods when dilutive. A reconciliation of the amounts included in the computation of earnings per common share from continuing operations, and earnings per common share from continuing operations, assuming dilution, is shown below:


	Three Months Ended June 30,				Six Months Ended June 30,					Three Months Ended September 30,				Nine Months Ended September 30,
*In millions, except per share amounts*	2006		2005		2006			2005		2006		2005		2006			2005
Earnings (loss) from continuing operations	$	116	$	91	$	(1,063	)	$	198	$	113	$	733	$	(960	)	$	919
Effect of dilutive securities		—		—		—			—		—		7		—			20

Earnings (loss) from continuing operations - assuming dilution	$	116	$	91	$	(1,063	)	$	198	$	113	$	740	$	(960	)	$	939

Average common shares outstanding		486.9		485.9		486.6			486.0		482.5		486.0		485.2			486.0
Effect of dilutive securities
Profit sharing plan		—		1.2		—			1.2		2.1		1.0		—			1.2
Stock options		0.3		0.3		—			0.8		0.3		0.1		—			0.3
Zero coupon convertible debentures											—		20.0					20.0

Average common shares outstanding - assuming dilution		487.2		487.4		486.6			488.0		484.9		507.1		485.2			507.5

Earnings (loss) per common share from continuing operations	$	0.24	$	0.19	$	(2.19	)	$	0.41	$	0.23	$	1.51	$	(1.98	)	$	1.89

Earnings (loss) per common share from continuing operations - assuming dilution	$	0.24	$	0.19	$	(2.19	)	$	0.41	$	0.23	$	1.46	$	(1.98	)	$	1.85

~~Note: Average~~In July 2006, in connection with the planned use of projected proceeds from the Company’s Transformation Plan, International Paper’s Board of Directors authorized a share repurchase program to acquire up to $3.0 billion of the Company’s stock. In a modified “Dutch Auction” tender offer completed in September 2006, International Paper purchased 38,465,260 shares of its common stock at a price of $36.00 per share, plus costs to acquire the shares, ~~outstanding exclude unvested restricted shares. The above table excludes securities that were antidilutive~~ for a total cost of approximately $1.4 billion. Following the ~~periods presented, principally zero-coupon convertible debentures repurchased in June 2006.~~completion of this tender offer, International Paper had approximately 454.8 million shares of common stock outstanding.

During the third quarter of 2006, restructuring and other charges totaling $92 million before taxes ($56 million after taxes) were recorded. These charges consisted of a pre-tax charge of $57 million ($35 million after taxes), including severance and other termination benefit costs of approximately $15 million, $25 million of lease termination costs and $17 million of other charges associated with the Company’s Transformation Plan, and a $35 million pre-tax charge ($21 million after taxes) for adjustments to legal reserves (see Note 7).

During the second quarter of 2006, restructuring and other charges totaling $54 million before taxes ($33 million after taxes) were ~~recorded. Included in these charges were~~recorded, consisting of a pre-tax charge of $50 million ($30 million after taxes), including severance and other termination benefit costs of approximately $31 million and $19 million of other charges associated with the Company’s Transformation Plan, and a $4 million pre-tax charge ($3 million after taxes) for legal settlements.

During the first quarter of 2006, restructuring and other charges totaling $46 million before taxes ($28 million after taxes) were recorded. Included in these charges were a pre-tax charge of $20 million ($12 million after taxes) for organizational restructuring programs, principally severance costs associated with the Company’s Transformation Plan, a pre-tax charge of $8 million ($5 million after taxes) for losses on early extinguishment of debt, and a pre-tax charge of $18 million ($11 million after taxes) for adjustments to legal reserves. Also recorded was a pre-tax credit of $19 million ($12 million after taxes) for net insurance recoveries related to the hardboard siding and roofing litigation (see Note 7) and a charge of $6 million for tax adjustments.

During the third quarter of 2005, restructuring and other charges totaling $70 million before taxes ($48 million after taxes) were recorded. Included in this charge were a pre-tax charge of $44 million ($32 million after taxes) for organizational restructuring charges and a pre-tax charge of $26 million ($16 million after taxes) for losses on early extinguishment of debt. Also recorded in the third quarter were a pre-tax credit of $188 million ($109 million after taxes) for insurance recoveries related to the hardboard siding and roofing litigation (see Note 7) and a $3 million pre-tax credit ($2 million after taxes) for the net adjustment of previously provided reserves. In addition, a $517 million net reduction of the income tax provision was recorded, including a credit from an agreement reached with the U.S. Internal Revenue Service concerning the 1997 through 2000 U.S. federal income tax audits, a charge related to cash repatriations from non-U.S. subsidiaries, and a charge relating to a change in Ohio state tax laws. Interest expense, net, also includes a $43 million pre-tax credit ($26 million after taxes) relating to this agreement.

During the second quarter of 2005, a pre-tax charge of $31 million ($19 million after taxes) for organizational restructuring charges, and a pre-tax credit of $35 million ($21 million after taxes) for insurance recoveries related to the hardboard siding and roofing litigation were recorded. The organizational restructuring charges included $17 million before taxes ($11 million after taxes) recorded in the Printing Papers business segment for severance and other charges associated with the indefinite shutdown of three U.S. paper machines, and $14 million before taxes ($8 million after taxes) in the Forest Products business segment for costs associated with relocating the business headquarters to Memphis, Tennessee from Savannah, Georgia. Additionally, an $82 million increase in the income tax provision was recorded, including approximately $79 million for deferred taxes related to earnings repatriated during the quarter under the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004.

During the first quarter of 2005, a special charge of $24 million before taxes ($15 million after taxes) was recorded for losses on early extinguishment of high-coupon-rate debt.

During the 2006 third quarter, International Paper completed the previously announced sale of its Brazilian Coated Papers business to Stora Enso Oyj for approximately $420 million, subject to certain post-closing adjustments. The business includes a coated paper mill and lumber mill in Arapoti, Parana State, Brazil, as well as 50,000 hectares (approximately 124,000 acres) of forestland in Parana. The operating results of this business for all periods presented are included in Discontinued operations in the accompanying consolidated statement of operations, including a pre-tax gain of $101 million ($80 million after taxes) recorded in the 2006 third quarter as a result of the sale. Revenues associated with this business were $33 million and $127 million, respectively for the three-month and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2006. Revenues for the comparable 2005 periods were $57 million and $149 million, respectively.

During the 2006 second quarter, the Company signed a definitive agreement to sell its Kraft Papers business for approximately $155 million in cash, subject to certain closing and post-closing adjustments, and two additional payments totaling up to $60 million payable five years from the date of closing contingent upon business performance. The operating results of this business for all periods presented are included in Discontinued operations in the accompanying consolidated statement of operations, including a pre-tax charge of $101 million ($62 million after taxes) recorded in the 2006 first quarter to reduce the carrying value of the business’s net assets to their estimated fair values. Additionally, a pre-tax charge of $16 million ($10 million after taxes) was recorded in Discontinued operations in the 2006 second quarter to further reduce the carrying value of the assets of this business based on the terms of the definitive agreement

discussed above. Revenues associated with the Kraft Papers business were $62 million and $174 million, respectively for the three-month and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2006. Revenues for the comparable 2005 periods were $54 million and $165 million, respectively.

Earnings and diluted earnings per share related to the Kraft Papers and Brazilian Coated Papers operations were as follows:

At September 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005, assets of businesses held for sale totaled $270 million and $3.3 billion, respectively, and liabilities of businesses held for sale totaled $98 million and $238 million, respectively, and included the Kraft Papers business, the Brazilian Coated Papers business, the Coated and Supercalendered ~~Papers:~~Papers business and certain smaller businesses, as follows:

In the third quarter of 2005, International Paper completed the sale of its 50.5% interest in Carter Holt Harvey Limited (CHH) for approximately U.S. $1.1 billion. The pre-tax gain on the sale of $29 million ($361 million after taxes and minority interest), including a $186 million pre-tax credit from cumulative translation adjustments, was included in Discontinued operations, together with CHH’s operating results prior to the sale. Revenues associated with the discontinued operation were $541 million and $1.7 billion for the three-month and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2005. Earnings and diluted earnings per share related to these operations were as follows:


*In millions, except per share amounts*	Three Months Ended September 30, 2005			Nine Months Ended September 30, 2005
Earnings (loss) from discontinued operations
Earnings (loss) from operations	$	(11	)	$	(43	)
Gain on sale of business		29			29
Income tax expense		265			242
Minority interest, net of taxes		(2	)		8

Loss from discontinued operations, net of taxes and minority interest	$	281		$	236

Earnings (loss) per common share from discontinue operation - assuming dilution
Loss from operations, net of taxes	$	(0.16	)	$	(0.25	)
Gain on sale, net of taxes and minority interest		0.71			0.71

Earnings per common share from discontinued operations, net of taxes and minority interest - assuming dilution	$	0.55		$	0.46

During the third quarter of 2006, a net pre-tax gain of $110 million (a loss of $13 million after taxes) was recorded for gains (losses) on sales and impairments of businesses. This net gain included pre-tax credits of $304 million ($185 million after taxes) for gains on sales of U.S. forestlands included in the Transformation Plan, the recognition of a previously deferred $110 million pre-tax gain ($68 million after taxes) related to a 2004 sale of forestlands in Maine, pre-tax losses of $165 million and $115 million ($165 million and $82 million after taxes) to adjust the carrying values of the Company’s Wood Products and Beverage Packaging businesses to estimated fair values based on preliminary bids received, a pre-tax charge of $38 million ($23 million after taxes) to reflect the completion of the sale of the Company’s Coated and Supercalendered Papers business in the 2006 third quarter, and a net pre-tax gain of $14 million (a loss of $2 million after taxes) related to other smaller sales.

Also during the third quarter of 2006, International Paper Investments (Holland) B.V. (IPI), a wholly-owned subsidiary of International Paper, announced that it had entered into an agreement with Votorantim Celulose e Papel S.A. (VCP) to exchange IPI’s pulp mill project being developed in Tres Lagoas, state of Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil (together with approximately 100,000 hectares of forestlands) for VCP’s Luiz Antonio pulp and uncoated paper mill and approximately 60,000 hectares of forestlands located in the state of Sao Paulo, Brazil. IPI will fund the Tres Lagoas pulp mill project in the amount of U.S. $1.15 billion. This transaction is expected to close by February 1, 2007.

During the second quarter of 2006, a net pre-tax charge of $75 million ($51 million after taxes) was recorded, including a pre-tax credit of $62 million ($39 million after taxes) for gains on sales of U.S. forestlands included in the Transformation Plan, a pre-tax charge of $85 million ($53 million after taxes) recorded to adjust the carrying value of the assets of the Company’s Coated and Supercalendered Papers business to their estimated fair value based on the terms of the definitive sales agreement signed in the second quarter, and a pre-tax charge of $52 million ($37 million after taxes) recorded to write down the carrying value of certain assets in Brazil to their estimated fair value. The assets in Brazil were written down to estimated net realizable value upon sale since the sale of these assets was considered probable at June 30, 2006.

During the first quarter of 2006, a pre-tax special charge of $1.3 billion was recorded to write down the assets of the Company’s Coated and Supercalendered Papers business to their estimated fair value. In addition, other pre-tax charges totaling $3 million ($2 million after taxes) were recorded to adjust estimated losses of certain smaller operations that are held for sale.

In the 2006 first quarter, the Company had reported its Coated and Supercalendered Papers business as a discontinued operation based on a plan to sell the business. In the second quarter of 2006, the Company signed a definitive agreement to sell this business for approximately $1.4 billion, subject to certain post-closing adjustments, and agreed to acquire a 10% limited partnership interest in CMP Investments L.P., the parent company that will own this business. Since this limited partnership interest will represent significant continuing involvement in the operations of this business under U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, the operating results for Coated and Supercalendered Papers are required to be included in continuing operations in the accompanying consolidated statement of operations. Accordingly, the operating results for this business, including a charge in the first quarter of $1.3 billion before and after taxes to write down the assets of the business to their estimated fair value, are now included in continuing operations for all periods presented. An additional pre-tax charge of $85 million ($53 million after taxes) was recorded in the second quarter to adjust the net assets of this business to their estimated fair value based on the terms of the definitive sales agreement discussed above (see “Other Transactions” below).

At June 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005, assets held for sale totaled $1.7 billion and $3.0 billion, respectively, and liabilities of businesses held for sale totaled $216 million and $195 million, respectively, and included Kraft Papers, Coated and Supercalendered Papers and certain smaller businesses, as follows:

In the third quarter of 2005, International Paper completed the sale of its 50.5% interest in Carter Holt Harvey Limited for approximately U.S. $1.1 billion. The pre-tax gain on the sale of $29 million ($361 million after taxes and minority interest), including a $186 million pre-tax credit from cumulative translation adjustments, was included in Discontinued operations, together with CHH’s operating results prior to the sale. Revenues associated with the discontinued operation were $598 million and $1.1 billion for the three-month and six-month periods ended June 30, 2005. Earnings and diluted earnings per share related to these operations were as follows:

In March 2006, International Paper, The Nature Conservancy and The Conservation Fund reached an agreement to sell approximately 218,000 acres of forestlands across 10 U.S. states. The Nature Conservancy will acquire more than 173,000 acres in North Carolina, Virginia, Georgia, Florida, Alabama, Arkansas, Tennessee, Louisiana and Mississippi. The Conservation Fund will acquire more than 5,000 acres in Florida

and 500 acres in North Carolina. The two groups will jointly purchase an additional 39,000 acres in South Carolina. ~~International Paper will receive approximately $300 million from these sales at closing, expected to occur during 2006.~~ Also in March 2006, International Paper announced an agreement to sell 69,000 acres of forestlands in Wisconsin to The Nature Conservancy for approximately $83 million.

On April 4, 2006 International Paper announced definitive agreements with two separate investor groups under which it will sell a total of approximately 5.1 million acres of forestlands for aggregate proceeds of approximately $6.1 billion. Under one of the agreements, International Paper will sell approximately 3.8 million acres of forestlands located in the southern U.S. and 440,000 acres in Michigan to an investor group led by Resource Management Service, LLC (RMS) for approximately $5 billion in cash and notes at closing. Under a separate agreement, International Paper will sell approximately 900,000 acres of forestlands in Louisiana, Texas and Arkansas to an investor group led by TimberStar for approximately $1.1 billion in cash and notes at closing.

On April 11, 2006, International Paper announced a definitive agreement with The Lyme Timber Company, for the benefit of the Lyme Forest Fund L.P., for the sale of approximately 275,000 acres of forestlands in New York’s Adirondack Park for approximately $137 million.

During the third quarter of 2006, the Company completed sales of approximately 477,000 acres of forestlands under the Nature Conservancy, Conservation Fund and Lyme Forest Fund L.P. agreements for approximately $401 million, including an installment note receivable of $136 million, resulting in a pre-tax gain of approximately $304 million ($185 million after taxes). During the second quarter of 2006, the Company completed the sales of approximately 75,000 acres of forestlands under the above agreements for approximately $97 million, resulting in a pre-tax gain of approximately $62 million ($39 million after taxes). This gain, together with a pre-tax charge of $85 million ($53 million after taxes) recorded to adjust the carrying value of the assets of the Company’s Coated and Supercalendered Papers business to their estimated fair value based on the terms of the definitive sales agreement signed in the second quarter, and a pre-tax charge of $52 million ($37 million after taxes) recorded to write down the carrying value of certain assets in Brazil to their estimated fair value, is included in Net (gains) losses on sales and impairments of businesses held for sale in the accompanying consolidated statement of operations for the three months ended June 30, 2006. The assets in Brazil were written down to estimated net realizable value upon sale since the sale of these assets was considered probable at June 30, 2006.

The remaining sales under the agreements discussed above are expected to be completed ~~over~~during the ~~remainder~~fourth quarter of 2006. This will substantially complete International Paper’s sales of U.S. forestlands identified as part of the Company’s Transformation Plan. Anticipated total proceeds from all of these sale agreements, covering about 5.7 million acres or over 85% of the Company’s U.S. forestland holdings, are approximately $6.6 billion. The carrying value of these forestlands is included in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet as of ~~June~~September 30, 2006 under the caption Forestlands held for sale. The amount of gain that will be recognized by the Company upon the completion of these transactions will be dependent upon the final amount of proceeds received, costs incurred and transactions terms, and the portion, if any, of the gain that will be required to be deferred under applicable accounting standards. International Paper has retained approximately 660,000 acres of forestlands at ~~June~~September 30, 2006, some of which may be later sold in separate transactions to maximize the ~~value of~~proceeds from the land.

In the ~~first~~third quarter of 2006, a pre-tax special charge of $1.3 billion was recorded to write down the assets of the Company’s Coated and Supercalendered Papers business to their estimated fair value. In addition, other pre-tax2005, charges totaling $3$5 million before taxes ($23 million after taxes) were recorded ~~to adjust estimated~~for adjustments of losses ~~of certain smaller operations that are held for sale.~~

In the second quarter of 2005, a $19 million pre-tax credit ($12 million after taxes) was recorded, including a $25 million credit before taxes ($15 million after taxes) from the collection of a note receivable from the 2001 sale of the Flexible Packaging business, final charges related to the sale of Fine Papers and Industrial Papers, as well as net adjustments of losses from businesses previously sold.

During the first quarter of 2005, International Paper announced an agreement to sell its Fine Papers business to Mohawk Paper Mills, Inc. of Cohoes, New York. A $24 million pre-tax loss ($13 million after taxes) was recorded in the first quarter to write down the net assets of the Fine Papers business to their estimated net realizable value. The sale of Fine Papers was completed in the second quarter of 2005.

Also during the first quarter of 2005, International Paper announced that it had signed an agreement to sell its Industrial Papers business to an affiliate of Kohlberg and Company, LLC. A $49 million pre-tax loss ($35 million after taxes) was recorded in the first quarter to write down the net assets of the Industrial Papers business and related corporate assets to their estimated net realizable value. The sale of Industrial Papers was completed in the second quarter of 2005.

Also in the first quarter of 2005, charges totaling $6 million before taxes ($4 million after taxes) were recorded for adjustments to estimated losses on sales of certain smaller operations.


*In millions*	June 30, 2006		December 31, 2005		September 30, 2006		December 31, 2005
Raw materials	$	378	$	382	$	380	$	376
Finished pulp, paper and packaging products		1,523		1,539		1,519		1,534
Finished lumber and panel products		33		33		17		31
Operating supplies		338		286		319		276
Other		62		70		71		70

Total	$	2,334	$	2,310	$	2,306	$	2,287

Temporary investments with an original maturity of three months or less are treated as cash equivalents and are stated at cost. Temporary investments totaled ~~$97~~$473 million and $1.4 billion at ~~June~~September 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005, respectively.

Interest payments made during the ~~six-month~~nine-month periods ended ~~June~~September 30, 2006 and 2005 were ~~$346~~$507 million and ~~$373~~$630 million, respectively. The 2005 interest payments include a $52 million payment to the U.S. Internal Revenue Service related to the settlement of the 1997 – 2000 U.S. federal income tax audits. Capitalized net interest costs were $7$13 million and $5$8 million for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively. Total interest expense was ~~$336~~$498 million for the first ~~six~~nine months of 2006 and ~~$370~~$507 million for the first ~~six~~nine months of ~~2005.~~2005, net of a $43 million credit related to the settlement of the tax audits described above. Preferred Securities distributions paid by Southeast Timber, Inc., a consolidated subsidiary of International Paper, were $6$10 million and $5$7 million during the first ~~six~~nine months of 2006 and 2005, respectively. The expense related to these preferred securities was included in minority interest expense in the consolidated statement of operations. Income tax payments of ~~$80~~$114 million and ~~$174~~$357 million were made during the first ~~six~~nine months of 2006 and 2005, respectively.

Accumulated depreciation was ~~$17.8~~$17.9 billion at ~~June~~September 30, 2006 and ~~$17.3~~$18.2 billion at December 31, 2005. The allowance for doubtful accounts was $100 million at ~~June~~September 30, 2006 and ~~$102~~$98 million at December 31, 2005.

The following tables present changes in the goodwill balances as allocated to each business segment for the ~~six-month~~nine-month periods ended ~~June~~September 30, 2006 and 2005:


*In millions*	Balance December 31, 2005		Reclassifications and Other (a)		Additions/ (Reductions)			Balance June 30, 2006		Balance December 31, 2005		Reclassifications and Other (a)		Additions/ (Reductions)			Balance September 30, 2006
Printing Papers	$	1,674	$	1	$	—		$	1,675	$	1,674	$	1	$	—		$	1,675
Industrial Packaging		676		3		20	(b)		699		676		3		11	(b)		690
Consumer Packaging		987		1		(1	)(c)		987		987		1		(28	)(c)		960
Distribution		299		—		—			299		299		—		—			299
Forest Products		191		—		—			191		191		—		(165	)(c)		26
Corporate		11		—		—			11		11		—		—			11

Total	$	3,838	$	5	$	19		$	3,862	$	3,838	$	5	$	(182	)	$	3,661


*In millions*	Balance December 31, 2004		Reclassifications and Other (a)			Additions/ (Reductions)			Balance June 30, 2005		Balance December 31, 2004		Reclassifications and Other (a)			Additions/ (Reductions)			Balance September 30, 2005
Printing Papers	$	1,671	$	3		$	—		$	1,674	$	1,671	$	3		$	—		$	1,674
Industrial Packaging		591		(5	)		31	(b)		617		591		(5	)		16	(b)		602
Consumer Packaging		1,014		(4	)		5	(c)		1,015		1,014		(4	)		51	(c)		1,061
Distribution		299		—			—			299		299		—			—			299
Forest Products		190		1			—			191		190		1			—			191
Corporate		24		—			(13	)(d)		11		24		—			(13	)(d)		11

Total	$	3,789	$	(5	)	$	23		$	3,807	$	3,789	$	(5	)	$	54		$	3,838

Goodwill totaling approximately $1.2 billion at December 31, 2005 relating to the Company’s Coated and Supercalendered Papers business was written off in connection with the 2006 first-quarter $1.3 billion pre-tax charge to reduce the net assets of that business to estimated fair value (see Note 4).

The following table presents an analysis of activity related to the Company’s asset retirement obligations:


	Six Months Ended June 30,						Nine Months Ended September 30,
*In millions*	2006			2005			2006			2005
Asset retirement obligation, January 1	$	33		$	30		$	33		$	30
New liabilities		1			5			1			6
Liabilities settled		(1	)		(3	)		(3	)		(4	)
Net adjustments to existing liabilities		(1	)		(3	)		1			(4	)
Accretion expense		1			1			1			1

Asset retirement obligation, June 30	$	33		$	30
Asset retirement obligation, September 30							$	33		$	29

This obligation is included in Other liabilities in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet.

The components of the Company’s postretirement benefit expense were as follows:


	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,						Three Months Ended September 30,						Nine Months Ended September 30,
*In millions*	2006			2005			2006			2005			2006			2005			2006			2005
Service cost	$	—		$	—		$	1		$	1		$	1		$	1		$	2		$	2
Interest cost		7			9			16			19			8			10			24			29
Actuarial loss		7			4			11			10			6			5			17			15
Amortization of prior service cost		(15	)		(10	)		(24	)		(20	)		(13	)		(10	)		(37	)		(30	)

Net postretirement benefit cost (a)	$	(1	)	$	3		$	4		$	10		$	2		$	6		$	6		$	16

Employers’ Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans:

In September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued SFAS No. 158, “Employers’ Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans – an Amendment of FASB Statements No. 87, 88, 106, and 132(R).” This Statement requires a calendar year-end company with publicly traded equity securities that sponsors a postretirement benefit plan to fully recognize, as an asset or liability, the overfunded or underfunded status of its benefit plan(s) in its 2006 year-end balance sheet. It also requires a company to measure its plan assets and benefit obligations as of its year-end balance sheet date beginning with fiscal years ending after December 15, 2008. The Company is currently evaluating the provisions of this Statement.

In September 2006, the FASB also issued SFAS No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements,” which provides a single definition of fair value, together with a framework for measuring it, and requires additional disclosure about the use of fair value to measure assets and liabilities. It also emphasizes that fair value is a market-based measurement, not an entity-specific measurement, and sets out a fair value hierarchy with the highest priority being quoted prices in active markets. This Statement is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007, and interim periods within those fiscal years, and is to be applied prospectively as of the beginning of the year in which it is initially applied.

In September 2006, the FASB issued FSP No. AUG AIR-1, “Accounting for Planned Major Maintenance Activities,” which prohibits the use of the accrue-in-advance method of accounting for planned major maintenance activities in annual and interim reporting periods. The FSP permits the application of three alternative methods of accounting for planned major maintenance activities: the direct expense, built-in-overhaul, and deferral methods. The FSP is effective for the first fiscal year beginning after December 15, 2006. International Paper is currently evaluating the effects of implementing the provisions of this FSP.

In June 2006, the ~~Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB)~~FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 48 (FIN 48), “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes, an ~~Interpretation~~interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109.” FIN 48 prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. This Interpretation also provides guidance on classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, and transition, and significantly expands income tax disclosure ~~and transition.~~requirements. It applies to all tax positions accounted for in accordance with SFAS No. 109 and is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006. The Company is currently evaluating the effects of implementing the provisions of this Interpretation.

In February 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 155, “Accounting for Certain Hybrid Financial Instruments – an Amendment of FASB Statements No. 133 and 140,” which provides entities with relief from having to separately determine the fair value of an embedded derivative that would otherwise be required to be bifurcated from its host contract in accordance with SFAS No. 133. This Statement allows an entity to make an irrevocable election to measure such a hybrid financial instrument at fair value in its entirety, with changes in fair value recognized in earnings. This Statement is effective for all financial instruments acquired, issued, or subject to a remeasurement event occurring after the beginning of an entity’s first fiscal year that begins after September 15, 2006. International Paper believes that the adoption of SFAS No. 155 in 2007 will not have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.

In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 153, “Exchanges of Nonmonetary Assets, an Amendment of APB Opinion No. 29,” that replaces the exception from fair value measurement in APB Opinion No. 29, “Accounting for Nonmonetary Transactions,” for nonmonetary exchanges of similar productive assets with a general exception from fair value measurement for exchanges of nonmonetary assets that do not have commercial substance. A nonmonetary exchange has commercial substance if the future cash flows of the entity are expected to change significantly as a result of the exchange. International Paper applied the provisions of SFAS No. 153 prospectively in the first quarter of 2006, with no material effect on its consolidated financial statements.

In November 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 151, “Inventory Costs, an Amendment of ARB No. 43, Chapter 4.” This Statement requires that abnormal amounts of idle facility expense, freight, handling costs and wasted material be recognized as current-period charges. This Statement also introduces the concept of “normal capacity” and requires the allocation of fixed production overhead to inventory based on the normal capacity of the production facilities. Unallocated overhead must be recognized as an expense in the period in which it is incurred. International Paper adopted SFAS No. 151 in the first quarter of 2006, with no material effect on its consolidated financial statements.

In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 123 (revised 2004), “Share-Based Payment,” that requires compensation costs related to share-based payment transactions to be recognized in the financial statements. The amount of the compensation cost is measured based on the grant-date fair value of the equity or liability instruments issued. In addition, liability awards are remeasured each reporting period. Compensation cost is recognized over the period that an employee provides service in exchange for the award. This Statement applies to all awards granted after the required effective date and to awards modified, repurchased, or cancelled after that date. International Paper adopted SFAS No. 123(R) in the first quarter of 2006, with no material effect on its consolidated financial statements. See Note 10 for a further discussion of stock-based compensation plans.

International Paper has established reserves relating to the settlement, during 1998 and 1999, of three nationwide class action lawsuits against the Company and Masonite Corp., a former wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company. Those settlements relate to (1) exterior hardboard siding installed during the 1980’s (the “1980’s Hardboard Claims”) and during the 1990’s (the “1990’s Hardboard Claims,” and together with the 1980’s Hardboard Claims, the “Hardboard Claims”); (2) Omniwood siding installed during the 1990’s (the “Omniwood Claims”); and (3) Woodruf roofing installed during the 1980’s and 1990’s (the

~~“Woodruf~~ “Woodruf Claims”). Each of these settlements is discussed in detail in Note 10, Commitments and Contingent Liabilities, to the Financial Statements included in International Paper’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005 (the “2005 10-K”).

Since 2002, and until 2005, the aggregate claims activity with respect to the exterior siding and roofing settlements (the “Settlements”) had been in line with the projections prepared by the Company’s third-party consultant. As reported in the 2005 10-K, the number of valid 1980’s Hardboard Claims filed prior to the January 18, 2005 filing deadline significantly exceeded those projections. This increase, together with an increase in the average cost per claim, had resulted in payments by the Company in 2005 of approximately $119 million. These amounts exceeded projections by approximately $40 million.

Substantially all of the 1980’s Hardboard Claims were settled as of June 30, 2006, although settlement payments made in 2006 were approximately $7$8 million more than projected.

In 2005, the number of 1990’s Hardboard Claims filed was in line with projections. However, as reported in the 2005 10-K, the average cost of those claims increased above projected levels in 2005. As was the case for the 1980’s Hardboard Claims, the increased cost was due, in part, to a 2005 increase in the Means Price Data (an inflation-adjusted compensation formula based on replacement and refinishing cost for a particular area that is used in the determination of claims payments) compared to prior years. For the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2006, the number of 1990’s Hardboard Claims filed and the average cost per claim were both higher than projected, with claims payments totaling approximately $4$8 million more than projected. The claims filing deadline for the 1990’s Hardboard Claims is January 15, 2008.

The following table presents the claims activity of the 1980’s and 1990’s Hardboard Claims for the ~~six-month~~nine-month period ended ~~June~~September 30, 2006:


*In thousands*	Single Family		Multi- Family		Total		Single Family		Multi- Family		Total
December 31, 2005	20.2		3.2		23.4		20.2		3.2		23.4
No. of Claims Filed	9.0		0.2		9.2		14.1		0.4		14.5
No. of Claims Paid	(6.8	)	(1.1	)	(7.9	)	(9.9	)	(1.4	)	(11.3	)
No. of Claims Dismissed	(2.2	)	—		(2.2	)	(4.0	)	(0.1	)	(4.1	)

June 30, 2006	20.2		2.3		22.5
September 30, 2006							20.4		2.1		22.5

The average settlement cost per claim for the ~~six-month~~nine-month period ended ~~June~~September 30, 2006 for the Hardboard settlement was ~~$2,389.~~$2,369.

Throughout 2005, and ~~in the first and second quarters of~~through September 30, 2006, the Omniwood Claims activity and the Woodruf Claims activity have been in line with projections. The Company expects this trend to continue. The filing deadline for both the Omniwood and Woodruf ~~claims~~Claims is January 6, 2009. The following table presents the claims activity of the Omniwood Claims and the Woodruf Claims for the ~~six-month~~nine-month period ended ~~June~~September 30, 2006:


	Omniwood				Woodruf			Total						Omniwood				Woodruf			Total
*In thousands*	Single Family		Multi- Family		Single Family		Multi- Family	Single Family		Multi- Family		Total		Single Family		Multi- Family		Single Family		Multi- Family	Single Family		Multi- Family		Total
December 31, 2005	2.4		0.5		0.8		0.3	3.2		0.8		4.0		2.4		0.5		0.8		0.3	3.2		0.8		4.0
No. of Claims Filed	2.7		0.2		0.3		—	3.0		0.2		3.2		4.2		0.2		0.4		—	4.6		0.2		4.8
No. of Claims Paid	(2.5	)	(0.2	)	(0.2	)	—	(2.7	)	(0.2	)	(2.9	)	(3.3	)	(0.2	)	(0.3	)	—	(3.6	)	(0.2	)	(3.8	)
No. of Claims Dismissed	(0.4	)	—		(0.2	)	—	(0.6	)	—		(0.6	)	(0.8	)	—		(0.2	)	—	(1.0	)	—		(1.0	)

June 30, 2006	2.2		0.5		0.7		0.3	2.9		0.8		3.7
September 30, 2006														2.5		0.5		0.7		0.3	3.2		0.8		4.0

The average settlement costs per claim for the ~~six-month~~nine-month period ended ~~June~~September 30, 2006 for the Omniwood and Woodruf settlements were ~~$4,633~~$4,571 and ~~$5,337,~~$5,765, respectively.

The following table presents an analysis of the net reserve activity for the ~~six-month~~nine-month period ended ~~June~~September 30, 2006:


*In millions*	Hard- board			Omni- wood			Woodruf		Total			Hard- board			Omni- wood			Woodruf			Total
Balance, December 31, 2005	$	34		$	74		$	5	$	113		$	34		$	74		$	5		$	113
Additional Provisions		15			—			—		15			50			—			—			50
Payments		(28	)		(15	)		—		(43	)		(43	)		(21	)		(2	)		(66	)

Balance, June 30, 2006	$	21		$	59		$	5	$	85
Balance, September 30, 2006												$	41		$	53		$	3		$	97

During the first quarter of 2006, based on advice from the Company’s third-party consultant, a charge of $15 million was recorded to increase the aggregate hardboard siding and roofing reserve to management’s best estimate of the amount required for future ~~payments under~~payments. In the ~~Settlements. The~~second and third quarters of 2006, claims activity for the 1990s Hardboard Claims was in excess of projected amounts as both the number and average cost per claim exceeded projections. At the end of the third quarter, the Company ~~will continue to monitor claims activity~~determined that, pending receipt of an updated projection by the third-party consultant that takes into account trends and data through the end of the claims period (January 15, 2008) that is expected to be completed in the fourth quarter, an additional $35 million charge was required to increase the Hardboard Claims reserve balance to reflect these higher claims. Reserve balances at September 30, 2006 for Omniwood and Woodruf Claims continued to be in line with projections. The Company will reevaluate these ~~Settlements~~reserve balances following the completion of the updated projection to determine ifwhether any ~~further~~additional adjustments ~~to reserve balances will be warranted.~~are required.

As discussed in the 2005 10-K, the Company has entered into favorable agreements with various insurance carriers to settle claims relating to their refusal to indemnify and/or defend the Company and Masonite for, among other things, the settlement of Hardboard Claims. ~~Through March 31, 2006, these insurance carriers have agreed to pay the Company approximately $625 million.~~ In the second quarter, the Company participated in a binding arbitration proceeding with Ace Insurance to resolve the sole remaining coverage ~~dispute, the outcome of which will be decided by the~~dispute. The arbitration panel ~~sometime before~~has now determined that the ~~end of 2006.~~Company is not entitled to recover any amounts for these claims under the Ace insurance policy.

Cumulative net cash settlements received by the Company through ~~June~~September 30, 2006 in connection with ~~these~~Hardboard insurance settlements totaled approximately ~~$335~~$359 million. Total insurance recoveries are expected to be approximately $625 million, ~~and~~with the balance ~~will~~to be received in installments through the end of 2008.

As disclosed in the 2005 10-K, the Company is party to a class action lawsuit by a group of private landowners alleging that the Company and certain of its fiber suppliers, known as Quality Suppliers, engaged in an unlawful conspiracy to artificially depress the prices at which the Company procures fiber for its mills. While the Company continues to maintain that its Quality Supplier program did not violate any antitrust laws, it agreed to settle this case in the second quarter for a payment by the Company to the class of $12.4 million, including plaintiff counsel fees. ~~The~~An order from the Federal District Court in Columbia, South Carolina ~~has preliminarily approved~~approving the ~~settlement. A final hearing for court approval is scheduled for~~settlement was issued on September ~~25,~~27, 2006.

Also as disclosed in the 2005 10-K, the Company was a defendant in a purported antitrust class action brought by purchasers of coated publication papers in various U.S. federal and state courts. ~~These cases are based on alleged cartel activity by various U.S. and European manufacturers of coated papers.~~ The Company ~~believed it was not a proper party to these cases, and in the second quarter,~~ has been dismissed ~~with prejudice~~ from all ~~but~~indirect-purchaser cases, including one ~~remaining indirect-purchaser~~previously disclosed California ~~case. In that~~ case from which the Company ~~and~~was dismissed during the ~~California indirect-purchaser class counsel have filed a stipulation to dismiss the Company as a defendant, which is pending court approval.~~third quarter.

International Paper is involved from time to time in various other inquiries, administrative proceedings and litigation relating to contracts, sales of property, environmental, tax, antitrust, personal injury, employment and other matters, some of which allege substantial monetary damages. While any proceeding or litigation has the element of uncertainty, International Paper believes that the outcome of any such matters, pending or threatened, or all of them combined, will not have a material adverse effect on its consolidated financial statements.

In August 2006, International Paper used approximately $320 million of cash to repay its maturing 5.375% euro-denominated notes that were designated as a hedge of euro functional currency net investments. Other debt activity in the third quarter included the repayment of $143 million of 7.875% notes and $96 million of 7% debentures, all maturing within the quarter.

On June 20, 2006, International Paper paid approximately $1.2 billion to repurchase substantially all of its zero-coupon convertible debentures at a price equal to their accreted principal value plus interest, using proceeds from divestitures and $730 million of third party commercial paper issued under the Company’s receivables securitization program. As of ~~June~~September 30, 2006, International Paper had ~~repaid $120 million of~~reduced this commercial paper borrowing by a net of $30 million, reflecting repayments of second-quarter borrowings less amounts required for the “Dutch Auction” tender offer in September, and plans to repay the remainder by the end of 2006.

In February 2006, International Paper repurchased $195 million 6.4% debentures with an original maturity date of February 2026. Other reductions in the first quarter 2006 included early payment of approximately $495 million of notes with coupon rates ranging from 4% to 8.875% and original maturities from 2007 to 2029. Pre-tax early debt retirement costs of $8 million related to first quarter 2006 debt reductions are included in Restructuring and other charges in the accompanying consolidated statement of operations.

In March 2006, International Paper replaced its maturing $750 million revolving bank credit agreement with a 364-day $500 million fully committed revolving bank credit agreement that expires in March 2007 and has a facility fee of 0.08% payable quarterly, and replaced its $1.25 billion revolving bank credit agreement with a $1.5 billion fully committed revolving bank credit agreement that expires in March 2011 and has a facility fee of 0.10% payable quarterly. The new agreements generally provide for interest rates at a floating rate index plus a pre-determined margin dependent upon International Paper’s credit rating.

On October 25, 2006, the Company amended its existing receivables securitization program that provides for up to $1.2 billion of commercial paper-based financings with a facility fee of 0.20% and an expiration date in November 2007, to provide up to $1 billion of available commercial paper-based financings with a facility fee of 0.10% and an expiration date of October 2009.

During 2006, the Company entered into a series of fixed-to-floating interest rate agreements with a notional amount of approximately $1.2 billion. The objective of these transactions, all of which qualify as fully effective fair value hedges under SFAS No. 133, was to manage interest rate risks associated with International Paper’s debt. These additional agreements increased the outstanding notional amounts of fully effective fair value interest rate swaps to approximately $3 billion, with a fair value net asset of approximately $18 million as of September 30, 2006.

In September 2005, International Paper used proceeds from the sale of its interest in CHH to repay the remaining $250 million portion of a subsidiary’s $650 million long-term debt with an interest rate of LIBOR plus 62.5 basis points and a maturity date of June 2007, and $312 million of commercial paper that had been issued in the same quarter. Other reductions in the 2005 third quarter included repayment of $662 million of notes with coupon rates ranging from 4% to 7.35% and original maturities from 2009 to 2029, and the repayment of $150 million of 7.10% notes with a maturity date of September 2005. Pre-tax early debt retirement costs of $26 million related to third quarter 2005 debt reductions are included in Restructuring and other charges in the accompanying consolidated statement of operations.

In June 2005, International Paper repaid approximately $400 million of a subsidiary’s long-term debt with an interest rate of LIBOR plus 62.5 basis points and a maturity date of June 2007.

In February 2005, International Paper redeemed the outstanding $464 million aggregate principal amount of International Paper Capital Trust 5.25% convertible subordinated debentures originally due in July 2025 at 100.5% of par plus accrued interest. Other reductions in the first quarter of 2005 included early payment of approximately $295 million of principal on notes with coupon rates ranging from 4% to 7.875% and original maturities from 2006 to 2015. Pre-tax early debt retirement costs of $24 million related to first quarter 2005 debt reductions are included in Restructuring and other charges in the accompanying consolidated statement of operations.

At December 31, 2005, International Paper had classified as Long-term debt $1.25 billion of tenderable bonds, commercial paper and bank notes and current maturities of long-term debt. International Paper had the intent and ability to renew or convert these obligations as evidenced by ~~the~~ credit facilities ~~described above.~~existing at that date.

Maintaining a strong investment-grade credit rating is an important element of International Paper’s corporate finance strategy. In the third quarter of 2006, Standard & Poor’s revised the outlook on the Company’s long-term credit ratings from BBB negative to stable outlook and upgraded its short-term credit rating from A-3 to A-2. At ~~June~~September 30, 2006, the Company also held a long-term credit ~~ratings~~rating of ~~BBB (negative outlook) and~~ Baa3 (stable outlook) ~~by Standard & Poor’s (S&P)~~ and a short-term credit rating of P-3 from Moody’s Investor ~~Services (Moody’s), respectively. The Company currently has short-term credit ratings by S&P and Moody’s of A-3 and P-3, respectively.~~Services.

International Paper maintains pension plans that provide retirement benefits to substantially all domestic employees hired prior to July 1, 2004. These employees generally are eligible to participate in the plans upon completion of one year of service and attainment of age 21. Employees hired after June 30, 2004, who are not eligible for this pension plan, will receive an additional company contribution to their savings plan.

The plans provide defined benefits based on years of credited service and either final average earnings (salaried employees), hourly job rates or specified benefit rates (hourly and union employees). A detailed discussion of these plans is presented in Note 15 to the Financial Statements included in International Paper’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005.

Net periodic pension expense for the Company’s qualified and nonqualified U.S. defined benefit plans consisted of the following:


	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,						Three Months Ended September 30,						Nine Months Ended September 30,
*In millions*	2006			2005			2006			2005			2006			2005			2006			2005
Service cost	$	35		$	34		$	71		$	65		$	35		$	32		$	106		$	97
Interest cost		127			120			253			237			127			118			380			355
Expected return on plan assets		(135	)		(139	)		(270	)		(278	)		(135	)		(139	)		(405	)		(417	)
Actuarial loss		63			46			121			84			60			41			182			125
Amortization of prior service cost		6			7			14			14			7			8			20			22

Net periodic pension expense (a)	$	96		$	68		$	189		$	122		$	94		$	60		$	283		$	182

While International Paper may elect to make voluntary contributions to its U.S. qualified plan up to the maximum deductible amount per Internal Revenue Service tax regulations in the coming years, it is unlikely that any contributions to the plan will be required before 2007 unless investment performance is negative or International Paper changes its funding policy. The nonqualified plan is funded to the extent of benefit payments, which equaled ~~$12~~$23 million through ~~June~~September 30, 2006.

International Paper has a Long-Term Incentive Compensation Plan (LTICP) that includes a Stock Option Program, a Restricted Performance Share Program and a Continuity Award Program, administered by a committee of independent members of the Board of Directors who are not eligible for these awards. A detailed discussion of these plans is presented in Note 17 to the Financial Statements included in International Paper’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005. As of ~~June~~September 30, 2006, ~~21.9~~22.7 million shares were available for grant under the LTICP.

Effective January 1, 2006, the Company adopted the provisions of SFAS No. 123(R), “Share-Based Payment,” using the modified prospective transition method and, accordingly, prior period amounts have not been restated. This pronouncement requires that compensation costs related to share-based payments be recognized in the financial statements. For equity awards, the amount of compensation cost is measured based on the grant date fair value of the award. The resulting cost is recognized over the period during which an employee is required to provide service in exchange for the award, usually the vesting period. Prior to January 1, 2006, the Company applied the provisions of APB Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees,” and related interpretations and the disclosure provisions of SFAS No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation,” in accounting for its plans.

Total stock-based compensation cost recognized in Selling and administrative expense in the accompanying consolidated statement of operations for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2006 and 2005 was ~~$38.8~~$98.8 million and ~~$19.4~~$31.5 million, respectively. The actual tax benefit realized for stock-based compensation costs was ~~$2.0 million and $2.4~~$2.5 million for ~~the six-month~~both nine-month periods ended ~~June~~September 30, 2006 and ~~2005, respectively.~~2005. At ~~June~~September 30, 2006, ~~$130.5~~$121.1 million, net of estimated forfeitures, of compensation cost related to unvested restricted performance shares and continuity awards attributable to future performance had not yet been recognized. This amount will be recognized in expense over a weighted-average period of ~~1.6~~1.4 years.

Restricted Performance Share Program (PSP) awards are earned based on the achievement of defined performance rankings of return on investment (ROI) and total shareholder return (TSR) compared to a peer group of companies. For awards issued to non-senior management, the awards are weighted 75% for ROI and 25% for TSR. For awards issued to certain members of senior management, the awards are weighted 50% for ROI and 50% for TSR. The ROI component of the PSP awards is valued at the closing stock price on the day prior to the grant date. As the ROI component contains a performance condition, compensation expense, net of estimated forfeitures, is recorded over the requisite service period based on the most probable number of awards expected to vest. The TSR component of the PSP awards is valued using a Monte Carlo simulation as the TSR component contains a market condition. The Monte Carlo simulation estimates the fair value of the TSR component based on the expected term of the award, risk-free rate, expected dividends, and the expected volatility for the Company and its competitors. The expected term was estimated based on the vesting period of the awards, the risk-free rate was based on the yield on U.S. Treasury securities matching the vesting period, the expected dividends were assumed to be zero for all companies, ~~to reflect TSR rather than stock price growth,~~ and the volatility was based on the Company’s historical volatility over the expected term.

PSP awards issued to the senior management group are liability awards, which are required to be remeasured at fair value at each balance sheet date. The valuation of these PSP liability awards is computed based on the same methodology as the PSP equity awards.

The following table sets forth the assumptions used to determine compensation cost for the market condition component of the PSP plan consistent with the requirements of SFAS No. 123(R):

The following summarizes the activity for all performance-based programs for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2006:


	Nonvested Shares		Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value		Nonvested Shares		Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value
Outstanding at December 31, 2005	4,195,317		$	41.47	4,195,317		$	41.47
Granted	2,320,858			33.58	2,320,858			33.58
Issued (a)	(378,042	)		35.89
Shares Issued (a)					(378,042	)		35.89
Forfeited	(50,666	)		39.16	(50,666	)		39.16

Outstanding at June 30, 2006	6,087,467		$	38.83
Outstanding at September 30, 2006					6,087,467		$	38.83

The Company discontinued its stock option program in 2004 for members of executive management, and in 2005 for all other eligible U.S. and non-U.S. employees. Stock-based compensation expense totaling $5,000 related to a stock option reload ~~totaling $5,000~~ was recorded for the ~~three~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2006. The expense was calculated under the Black-Scholes option pricing model using 19.7% expected volatility, an interest rate of 4.97%, a 2.7% expected dividend yield, and a term of two years. As of ~~June~~September 30, 2006, all outstanding options were fully vested.

A summary of option activity under the plan as of ~~June~~September 30, 2006 is presented below:


	Options		Weighted Average Exercise Price		Weighted Average Remaining Life (years)	Aggregate Intrinsic Value (thousands)		Options		Weighted Average Exercise Price		Weighted Average Remaining Life (years)	Aggregate Intrinsic Value (thousands)
Outstanding at December 31, 2005	41,581,598		$	39.49				41,581,598		$	39.49
Granted	997			39.06				997			37.06
Exercised	(603,645	)		32.77				(785,628	)		32.61
Forfeited	(309,074	)		45.62				(678,339	)		44.95
Expired	(1,836,080	)		41.99				(2,299,835	)		41.30

Outstanding at June 30, 2006	38,833,796		$	39.43	5.57	$	2,029
Outstanding at September 30, 2006								37,818,793		$	39.43	5.18	$	1,491

The following summarizes the activity of the Continuity Award Program for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2006:


	Nonvested Shares		Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value		Nonvested Shares		Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value
Outstanding at December 31, 2005	250,375		$	38.49	250,375		$	38.49
Granted	55,000			34.41	55,000			34.41
Issued	(74,875	)		38.91
Shares Issued					(81,958	)		38.74
Forfeited	(32,750	)		38.41	(49,667	)		37.15

Outstanding at June 30, 2006	197,750		$	37.21
Outstanding at September 30, 2006					173,750		$	37.46

Pro Forma Information for Periods Prior to the Adoption of SFAS No. 123(R):

Prior to January 1, 2006, the Company accounted for stock-based awards under the intrinsic value method, which followed the recognition and measurement principles of APB Opinion No. 25. The following table illustrates the effect on net earnings, net earnings per common share and net earnings per common share, assuming dilution, for the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2005 if the Company had applied the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS No. 123.


*In millions, except per share amounts*	Three Months Ended June 30, 2005			Six Months Ended June 30, 2005			Three Months Ended September 30, 2005			Nine Months Ended September 30, 2005
Net earnings, as reported	$	77		$	154		$	1,023		$	1,177
Deduct: Total stock-based employee compensation expense determined under fair value based method for all awards, net of related tax effects		(15	)		(28	)		(27	)		(55	)

Pro forma net earnings	$	62		$	126		$	996		$	1,122

Earnings per common share
Basic and diluted - as reported	$	0.16		$	0.32
Basic - as reported							$	2.10		$	2.42

Basic and diluted - pro forma	$	0.13		$	0.26
Basic - pro forma							$	2.04		$	2.31

Earnings per common share
Diluted - as reported							$	2.03		$	2.36

Diluted - pro forma							$	1.98		$	2.25

On ~~July 13,~~October 25, 2006, ~~in connection with the planned use of projected proceeds from the Company’s Transformation Plan,~~ International Paper and Ilim Pulp, the largest forest products enterprise in Russia, announced that ~~its board~~a letter of ~~directors~~intent had ~~authorized~~been signed to establish a ~~share repurchase program~~50-50 joint venture. If definitive agreements are reached, this joint venture would be the largest foreign-domestic alliance in the Russian forest sector. It is currently contemplated that International Paper will purchase a 50% equity interest in the joint venture for approximately $400 million in cash. The total enterprise value of the joint venture is approximately $1.3 billion, excluding approximately $500 million of debt that will be nonrecourse to ~~acquire up~~the joint venture partners. The parties currently expect to ~~$3.0~~finalize the agreement in the next six months, following completion of due diligence, receipt of required regulatory approvals, and the approvals of their respective boards of directors.

On October 30, 2006 and November 3, 2006, International Paper completed the previously announced sales of approximately 5.1 million acres of forestlands to TimberStar and Resource Management Service, LLC, respectively, for proceeds totaling approximately $6.1 billion of ~~the Company’s stock.~~

20cash and notes. These sales will result in an estimated special fourth-quarter pre-tax gain in excess of $4 billion.


	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,						Three Months Ended September 30,						Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2006			2005 (2)			2006			2005 (2)			2006			2005 (1)			2006 (1)			2005 (1)
Printing Papers	$	1,915		$	1,775		$	3,810		$	3,650		$	1,670		$	1,795		$	5,385		$	5,350
Industrial Packaging		1,240			1,165			2,410			2,380			1,250			1,075			3,660			3,455
Consumer Packaging		795			790			1,570			1,530			855			785			2,425			2,290
Distribution		1,690			1,570			3,340			3,100			1,730			1,645			5,070			4,745
Forest Products		595	(5)		605	(5)		1,225	(5)		1,215	(5)		445	(4)		700	(4)		1,670	(4)		1,915	(4)
Specialty Businesses and Other (3)		235			230			465			505
Specialty Businesses and Other (2)														245			220			710			725
Corporate and Inter-segment Sales		(200	)		(275	)		(487	)		(563	)		(328	)		(295	)		(813	)		(830	)

Net Sales	$	6,270		$	5,860		$	12,333		$	11,817		$	5,867		$	5,925		$	18,107		$	17,650


Operating Profit by Industry Segment

	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2006			2005 (2)			2006			2005 (2)
Printing Papers	$	254	(1,6)	$	139	(8)	$	382	(1,6)	$	313
Industrial Packaging		100			84			138			186	(8)
Consumer Packaging		41	(6)		53			76	(6)		85
Distribution		36			18			63			36
Forest Products		184	(7)		191	(7,8)		410	(7)		398	(7,8)
Specialty Businesses and Other (3)		16			7			26			17

Operating Profit		631			492			1,095			1,035
Interest expense, net		(148	)		(155	)(9)		(296	)		(323	)(9)
Minority interest (4)		2			2			5			1
Corporate items, net		(174	)		(133	)		(350	)		(287	)
Restructuring and other charges		(54	)		—			(100	)		(24	)
Insurance recoveries		—			35			19			35
Net (losses) gains on sales and impairments of businesses held for sale		(75	)		19			(1,358	)		(60	)

Earnings (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes and minority interest	$	182		$	260		$	(985	)	$	377


	Three Months Ended June 30,		Six Months Ended June 30,		Three Months Ended September 30,			Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2006	2005	2006	2005	2006		2005	2006	2005
Printing Papers (In thousands of short tons)
Brazil Uncoated Papers	114	107	232	219	121		111	353	330
Europe & Russia Uncoated Papers	340	358	719	717	353		342	1,072	1,059
U.S. Uncoated Papers	996	915	2,025	1,946	1,006		940	3,031	2,886

Uncoated Papers	1,450	1,380	2,976	2,882	1,480		1,393	4,456	4,275
Coated Papers	588	580	1,183	1,155	220	(4)	582	1,300	1,630
Market Pulp (3)	289	307	574	603	282		335	856	938

Packaging (In thousands of short tons)
Container of the Americas	930	906	1,831	1,796	902		886	2,733	2,682
European Container (Boxes)	325	273	646	532	293		262	939	794
Other Industrial and Consumer Packaging	120	134	239	261	115		126	354	387

Industrial and Consumer Packaging	1,375	1,313	2,716	2,589	1,310		1,274	4,026	3,863
Containerboard	438	438	934	909	451		466	1,385	1,375
Bleached Packaging Board	393	351	769	722	405		341	1,174	1,063
Coated Bristols	102	107	210	210	101		101	311	311
Kraft	74	60	134	122	62		63	196	185

Forest Products (In millions)
Panels (sq. ft. 3/8”- basis)	413	367	815	768
Panels (sq. ft. 3/8” - basis)					404		444	1,219	1,212
Lumber (board feet)	666	663	1,294	1,276	613		675	1,907	1,951

Sales Volumes represent supplemental information that is not included in Item 1. Financial Information.

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

International Paper ~~had~~reported solid 2006 third quarter operating results driven by much improved performance in ~~the 2006 second quarter, experiencing strong growth in revenues.~~our key platform North American Paper and Packaging businesses. Average product prices improved ~~during~~compared with the second quarter across all uncoated paper, pulp and packaging grades as a number of ~~previously~~ announced price increases were ~~partially or~~ fully ~~realized.~~implemented. Sales volumes were solid and generally comparable with the second quarter. Global manufacturing operations continued to ~~first-quarter levels~~perform well in the quarter, although we continue to be challenged by high input and distribution costs. However, the operating results for our Wood Products business were down sharply reflecting lower product prices in a weak housing market. The effective tax rate was lower for the third quarter reflecting a lower projected full-year rate.

Looking forward to the fourth quarter, sales volumes are expected to be seasonally slower toward the end of the year. For North America, we have realized substantially all of our announced paper and packaging price increases and believe that we are near the bottom on wood products prices. Input and distribution costs are likely to remain high, although we believe there are some favorable signs on the horizon. Benefits from expected continued improvement in our global manufacturing operations will be somewhat offset by an increase in planned maintenance downtime. Net interest expense should be lower in the quarter due to interest income from the installment notes we will receive as ~~low inventories constrained shipments for both containerboard and market pulp. Raw material costs were~~the Transformation Plan forestland sales close. Thus, earnings from continuing operations, before special items, are expected to be slightly lower than in the ~~first quarter, reflecting declining natural gas and wood prices, while fuel oil costs were essentially flat. Freight costs were higher than in the first~~third quarter. ~~Our global manufacturing operations performed well during the quarter. We reported lower land sales and a slightly higher tax rate compared with the first quarter.~~

Looking to the third quarter, we expect that earnings from continuing operations, excluding any special items, will be higher than in the second quarter. Sales volumes in our key platform businesses should be solid, supported by improved product inventory levels. Price realizations should continue to improve reflecting previously announced global International Paper price increases in paper and packaging grades. The cost outlook is mixed, with wood costs continuing to decline while freight costs are expected to increase. The outlook for energy costs is uncertain. On the operating side, we expect continued progress in improving our global manufacturing operations.

For the ~~second~~third quarter of 2006, International Paper reported net sales of ~~$6.3~~$5.9 billion, compared with $5.9 billion in the ~~second~~third quarter of 2005 and ~~$6.1~~$6.2 billion in the ~~first~~second quarter of 2006.

Net earnings totaled $201 million, or $0.42 per share, in the 2006 third quarter. This compared with net earnings of $1.0 billion, or $2.03 per share, in the third quarter of 2005 and $115 million, or $0.24 per share, in the ~~2006 second quarter. This compared with net earnings of $77 million, or $0.16 per share, in the~~ second quarter of ~~2005 and a net loss of $1.2 billion, or $2.54 per share, in the first quarter of~~ 2006. The first quarter 2006 net loss included a $1.3 billion pre-tax charge ($2.57 per share) to reduce the carrying values of the net assets of the Coated and Supercalendered Papers businesses to their estimated fair value. Amounts include the effects of special items in all periods.

Earnings from continuing operations were ~~$116~~$113 million in the ~~second~~third quarter of 2006 compared with earnings of ~~$91~~$733 million in the ~~second~~third quarter of 2005 and ~~a loss from continuing operations of $1.2 billion~~$112 million in the 2006 ~~first~~second quarter. Earnings in the 2006 ~~second~~third quarter benefited from higher average price realizations ($~~38 million), improved operations and a more favorable mix of products sold ($30~~127 million), higher sales volumes and decreased market-related downtime ($4815 million), and ~~higher gains from land sales~~lower operating costs and a more favorable mix of products sold ($16114 million) compared with the 2005 ~~second~~third quarter. These benefits were partially offset by higher ~~freight, energy and~~ raw material and freight costs ($5058 million) and lower gains from land sales ($40 million). In addition, corporate items and other costs ($1151 million) ~~were higher due to~~increased reflecting higher pension costs, incentive compensation and ~~benefit~~other benefit-related charges and supply chain costs. ~~Special items expense ($54 million) increased but was partially offset by lower net~~Net interest expense ($412 million). decreased. The Wood Products business reported significantly lower earnings ($64 million) as a result of lower price realizations. The Coated and Supercalendered business had lower after-tax earnings ($14 million) reflecting the sale of the business on August 1, 2006. Net special items were an expense of $75 million in the 2006 third quarter versus income of $603 million in the third quarter of 2005. Income tax expense was $4$17 million lower in the 2006 ~~second~~third quarter reflecting a lower estimated effective tax rate.

Compared with the ~~first~~second quarter of 2006, earnings from continuing operations benefited from higher average price realizations ($4841 million), higher sales volumes ($7 million), and improved manufacturing costs ($26 million) resulting from cost reduction actions ~~($46 million)~~ in prior ~~periods, and lower wood and natural gas costs ($25 million).~~periods. These benefits were partially offset by higher raw material and freight costs ($14 million). Corporate and other items increased ($31 million) due to higher incentive compensation and other benefit-related charges. Net interest expense ($3 million) decreased. Wood Products earnings were lower ~~sales volumes~~ ($241 million) reflecting the sharp decline in price realizations. The Coated and Supercalendered Papers business had lower ~~gains from land sales~~after-tax earnings ($1218 million). due to the sale of the business. Additionally, compared with the 2006 ~~first~~second quarter, 2006 ~~second-quarter~~third-quarter earnings reflected benefits from lower special charges ($9 million) and a ~~higher~~lower effective tax rate ($519 million), increased corporate and other items ($5 million), and significantly lower special charges ($1.2 billion), reflecting a $1.3 billion charge in the 2006 first quarter relating to the Coated and Supercalendered Papers business discussed below..

To measure the performance of the Company’s business segments from period to period without variations caused by special or unusual items, International Paper’s management focuses on business segment operating profit. This is defined as earnings before taxes and minority interest, excluding interest expense, corporate charges and special items that include restructuring charges, early debt extinguishment costs, legal reserves, insurance recoveries, gains (losses) on sales and impairments of businesses, ~~held for sale,~~ and the reversal of reserves no longer required. Prior-year industry segment information has been restated to conform to minor changes in the 2006 operational structure and to reflect the classification of the Kraft Papers ~~business~~and the Brazilian Coated Papers businesses as a discontinued ~~operation.~~

The following table presents a reconciliation of International Paper’s net earnings to its ~~industry segment~~ operating profit:


	Three Months Ended									Three Months Ended
	June 30,						March 31,			September 30,						June 30,
*In millions*	2006			2005			2006			2006			2005			2006
Net Earnings (Loss)	$	115		$	77		$	(1,237	)	$	201		$	1,023		$	115
Deduct - Discontinued operations:
(Earnings) loss from operations		(9	)		14			(4	)		(8	)		71			(13	)
Loss on sales or impairments		10			—			62
(Gain) loss on sales or impairments											(80	)		(361	)		10

Earnings From Continuing Operations		116			91			(1,179	)		113			733			112
Add back (deduct):
Income tax provision		61			166			8
Income tax provision (benefit)											163			(377	)		59
Minority interest expense, net of taxes		5			3			4			5			3			5

Earnings From Continuing Operations Before Income Taxes and Minority Interest		182			260			(1,167	)		281			359			176
Interest expense, net		148			155			148			144			121			147
Minority interest included in operations		(2	)		(2	)		(3	)		—			—			(2	)
Corporate items		174			133			176			216			140			174
Special items:
Restructuring and other charges		54			—			46			92			41			54
Insurance recoveries		—			(35	)		(19	)		—			(188	)		—
Net losses (gains) on sales and impairments of businesses held for sale		75			(19	)		1,283
Net (gains) losses on sales and impairments of businesses held for sale											(97	)		5			75
Reserve adjustments											—			(3	)		—

	$	631		$	492		$	464		$	636		$	475		$	624

Industry Segment Operating Profit
Printing Papers	$	254		$	139		$	128		$	249		$	117		$	247
Industrial Packaging		100			84			38			138			29			100
Consumer Packaging		41			53			35			64			43			41
Distribution		36			18			27			34			23			36
Forest Products		184			191			226			129			271			184
Specialty Businesses and Other		16			7			10			22			(8	)		16

Total Industry Segment Operating Profit	$	631		$	492		$	464		$	636		$	475		$	624

InDuring the 2006 ~~first~~third quarter, International Paper completed the ~~Company had reported~~previously announced sale of its Brazilian Coated ~~and Supercalendered~~ Papers business ~~as a discontinued operation based on a plan~~ to ~~sell the business. In the 2006 second quarter, the Company signed a definitive agreement to sell this business~~Stora Enso Oyj for approximately ~~$1.4 billion,~~$420 million, subject to certain post-closing adjustments, and agreed to acquire a 10% limited partnership interest in CMP Investments L.P., the parent company that will own this business. Since this interest will represent significant continuing involvement in the operationsadjustments. The operating results of this business ~~under U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, the operating results~~ for ~~this business~~all periods presented are ~~required to be~~ included in ~~continuing~~Discontinued operations in the accompanying consolidated statement of ~~operations. Accordingly, the operating results for this business,~~operations, including a ~~$1.3 billion charge before and~~pre-tax gain of $101 million ($80 million after ~~taxes ($2.57 per share) to write down the assets of the business to their estimated fair value~~taxes) recorded in the 2006 ~~first~~third quarter ~~are now included in continuing operations for all periods presented.~~

~~Discontinued operations includes the operating results~~as a result of the ~~Company’s Kraft Papers business.~~ sale.

In the 2006 first quarter, a pre-tax charge of $101 million ($0.13 per share) had been recorded to write down the carrying value of the assets of ~~this~~the Kraft Papers business to their estimated fair value. During the 2006 second quarter, International Paper signed a definitive agreement to sell this business to Stone Arcade Acquisition Corp. and recorded an additional pre-tax charge of $16 million ($0.02 per share) based on the terms of this agreement.

Discontinued operations for the second quarter of 2005 also includes the operating results of Carter Holt Harvey Limited sold in the third quarter of 2005.

The income tax provision was ~~$61~~$163 million for the 2006 third quarter. Excluding a $93 million charge relating to the tax effects of special items, the effective income tax rate for continuing operations was 27% for the quarter, bringing the effective tax rate for the 2006 nine-month period to 31%, the revised estimated full-year rate for 2006.

The income tax provision was $59 million in the 2006 second quarter. Excluding a $45 million credit relating to the tax effects of special items, the effective income tax rate for continuing operations was 34% for the quarter.

The income tax ~~provision~~benefit of $8$377 million in the ~~2006 first~~third quarter of 2005 included a $5$553 million non-cash income tax benefit resulting from an agreement reached with the U.S. Internal Revenue Service concerning the Company’s 1997 through 2000 federal income tax audits, a $21 million provision related to cash repatriated from non –U.S. subsidiaries under the ~~adjustment~~American Jobs Creation Act of ~~previously recorded~~2004, and a $15 million provision related to a change in Ohio state tax ~~reserves.~~laws. Excluding these items, and a ~~$36~~$73 million ~~credit~~charge relating to the tax effects of special items, the effective income tax rate for continuing operations was ~~30%~~34% for the quarter.

The income tax provision of $166 million in the second quarter of 2005 included a special charge of $94 million, principally for deferred taxes related to earnings repatriated during the quarter under the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004. The effective income tax rate for continuing operations before special items for the second quarter of 2005 was 31%.

Net interest expense for the 2006 ~~second~~third quarter was ~~$148~~$144 million, ~~equal to~~slightly lower than the $148 million in the 2006 ~~first~~second quarter, ~~and below~~but higher than the ~~$155~~$121 million in the 2005 ~~second~~third quarter. Net interest expense in the 2005 ~~second~~third quarter included ~~interest income~~a pre-tax credit of ~~$11 million~~$43 for a reduction of accrued interest related to the ~~collection of a note receivable from~~agreement with the ~~2001 sale of the Flexible Packaging business.~~U.S. Internal Revenue Service discussed above. Excluding this, net interest expense was ~~$166~~$164 million. The lower expense in the current quarter reflects lower average debt balances and interest rates due to debt refinancings and repayments in 2005 and 2006.

Corporate items, net, of ~~$174~~$216 million in the 2006 ~~second~~third quarter were ~~slightly lower~~higher than the 2006 ~~first-quarter~~second-quarter net expenses of ~~$176~~$174 million, ~~but~~and were higher than the net expenses of ~~$133~~$140 million in the ~~second~~third quarter of 2005. The ~~increase compared with~~higher expense in the ~~2005 second~~current quarter ~~was~~is due primarily ~~due~~ to higher ~~pension~~incentive compensation and other benefit costs.

During the third quarter of 2006, restructuring and other charges totaling $92 million before taxes ($56 million after taxes) were recorded. Included in these charges were a pre-tax charge of $57 million ($35 million after taxes), including severance and other charges associated with the Company’s Transformation Plan and a $35 million pre-tax charge ($21 million after taxes) for adjustments to legal reserves.

During the second quarter of 2006, restructuring and other charges totaling $54 million before taxes ($33 million after taxes) were recorded. Included in these charges were a pre-tax charge of $50 million ($30 million after taxes) for severance and other charges associated with the Company’s Transformation Plan and a $4 million pre-tax charge ($3 million after taxes) for legal settlements.

26During the second quarter of 2005, a pre-tax charge of $31 million ($19 million after taxes) for organizational restructuring charges was recorded. The organizational restructuring charges included $17 million before taxes ($11 million after taxes) recorded in the Printing Papers business segment for severance and other charges associated with the indefinite shutdown of three U.S. paper machines, and $14 million before taxes ($8 million after taxes) in the Forest Products business segment for costs associated with relocating the business headquarters to Memphis, Tennessee from Savannah, Georgia.

During the first quarter of 2005, a special charge of $24 million before taxes ($15 million after taxes) was recorded for losses on early extinguishment of high-coupon-rate debt.

During the first quarter of 2006, a pre-tax credit of $19 million ($12 million after taxes) was recorded for net insurance recoveries related to the hardboard siding and roofing litigation (see Note 7). The second ~~quarter~~and third quarters of 2005 also included a pre-tax credit of $35 million ($21 million after taxes) and $188 million ($109 million after taxes), respectively, for insurance recoveries related to this litigation.

During the third quarter of 2006, a net pre-tax gain of $110 million (a loss of $13 million after taxes) was recorded for ~~Sale~~(gains) losses on sales and impairments of businesses, including a $13 million pre-tax gain on sale of property in Spain recorded in the Industrial Packaging business. This net gain included pre-tax credits of $304 million ($185 million after taxes) for gains on sales of U.S. forestlands included in the Transformation Plan, the recognition of a previously deferred $110 million pre-tax gain ($68 million after taxes) related to a 2004 sale of forestlands in Maine, pre-tax losses of $165 million and $115 million ($165 million and $82 million after taxes) to adjust the carrying values of the Company’s Wood Products and Beverage Packaging businesses to estimated fair values, a pre-tax charge of $38 million ($23 million after taxes) to reflect the completion of the sale of the Company’s Coated and Supercalendered Papers business in the 2006 third quarter, and a net pre-tax gain of $14 million (a loss of $2 million after taxes) related to other smaller sales.

During the second quarter of 2006, a net pre-tax charge of $75 million ($51 million after taxes) for net (gains) losses on sales and impairments of businesses ~~held for sale~~ was recorded, including a pre-tax credit of $62 million ($39 million after taxes) for gains on sales of U.S. forestlands included in the Transformation Plan, a pre-tax charge of $85 million ($53 million after taxes) to adjust the net assets of the Company’s Coated and Supercalendered Papers business to their estimated fair value based on the terms of the definitive sales agreement signed in the second quarter, and a pre-tax charge of $52 million ($37 million after taxes) to write down the carrying value of certain assets in Brazil to their estimated fair value.

During the first quarter of 2006, a charge of $1.3 billion before and after taxes was recorded to write down the assets of the Company’s Coated and Supercalendered Papers business to their estimated fair value. In addition, other pre-tax charges totaling $3 million ($2 million after taxes) were recorded to adjust estimated losses of certain smaller operations that are held for sale.

In the third quarter of 2005, charges totaling $5 million before taxes ($3 million after taxes) were recorded for adjustments of losses on businesses previously sold.

In the second quarter of 2005, a pre-tax gain of $19 million ($12 million after taxes) was recorded for net adjustments of losses on businesses previously sold.

During the first quarter of 2005, pre-tax charges of $79 million ($52 million after taxes) were recorded, including a $24 million pre-tax loss ($13 million after taxes) to write down the net assets of the Fine Papers business to their estimated net realizable value, $49 million pre-tax loss ($35 million after taxes) to write down the net assets of the Industrial Papers business and related corporate assets to their estimated net realizable value and a $6 million charge before taxes ($4 million after taxes) for adjustments to estimated losses on sales of certain smaller operations.

Industry segment operating profits of ~~$631~~$636 million in the 2006 third quarter were higher than both $475 million in the 2005 third quarter and $624 million in the 2006 second ~~quarter were higher than both $492 million in the 2005 second quarter and $464 million in the 2006 first~~ quarter. Compared with the ~~second~~third quarter of 2005, earnings in the current quarter benefited from higher average prices ($57189 million), higher sales volumes and the impact of reduced market-related downtime ($7322 million), lower manufacturing operating costs and a more profitable mix of products sold ($45170 million), ~~higher gains from land sales ($24 million)~~ and other items ($156 million). Additionally, special items ($41 million) were favorable in the quarter. These benefits more than offset the effects of higher raw material and freight costs ($7586 million), ~~particularly energy.~~ and lower gains from land sales ($60 million). Wood Products earnings were significantly lower ($98 million) due to dramatically lower price realizations. The Coated and Supercalendered business had lower earnings ($23 million) as a result of the sale of the business on August 1, 2006.

Compared with the 2006 ~~first~~second quarter, operating profits benefited from higher average prices ($7262 million), higher sales volumes ($11 million), improved manufacturing operating performance and the impact of cost reduction efforts ($6939 million), ~~lower raw material costs~~favorable special charges ($3713 million) ~~including wood and natural gas~~ and lower other costs ($101 million). These benefits were partially offset by higher raw material and freight costs ($22 million). Wood Products earnings declined ($61 million) due to lower ~~sales volumes~~price realizations; while the Coated and Supercalendered business had lower earnings ($31 million) because of the ~~impact~~sale of ~~higher~~the business.

During the 2006 third quarter, International Paper took approximately 130,000 tons of downtime, including 28,000 tons for market-related downtime, ~~($3 million) and lower gains from land sales ($18 million).~~

compared with approximately 400,000 tons of downtime in the third quarter of 2005, which included 270,000 tons of market-related downtime. During the 2006 second quarter, International Paper took approximately 240,000 tons of downtime, including 25,000 tons for market-related downtime, compared with approximately 500,000 tons of downtime in the second quarter of 2005, which included 275,000 tons of market-related downtime. During the 2006 first quarter, International Paper took approximately 165,000 tons of downtime, including 30,000 tons for market-related downtime. Market-related downtime is taken to balance internal supply with our customer demand to help manage inventory levels, while maintenance downtime, which makes up the majority of the difference between total downtime and market-related downtime, is taken periodically during the year. The costs for annual planned maintenance downtime are charged to expense evenly ~~throughout the year.~~in each quarter. Market-related downtime costs are expensed in the periods in which the downtime is taken.

The following presents segment discussions for the ~~second~~third quarter of 2006.


	2006						2005						2006						2005
*In millions*	2nd Quarter		1st Quarter		Six Months		2nd Quarter		1st Quarter		Six Months		3rd Quarter		2nd Quarter		Nine Months		3rd Quarter		2nd Quarter		Nine Months
Sales	$	1,915	$	1,895	$	3,810	$	1,775	$	1,875	$	3,650	$	1,670	$	1,860	$	5,385	$	1,795	$	1,725	$	5,350
Operating Profit		254		128		382		139		174		313		249		247		615		117		128		413

Printing Papers net sales for the third quarter of 2006 were 10% lower than the second quarter of 2006 ~~were 1% higher~~and 7% lower than the ~~first quarter of 2006 and 8% higher than the second~~third quarter of 2005. Operating profits in the third quarter of 2006 were only slightly above profits in the second quarter of 2006, but were ~~about~~more than double profits in the ~~first quarter of 2006, and 83% higher than in the second~~third quarter of 2005.

U.S. Uncoated Papers earnings increased substantially in the ~~second~~third quarter of 2006 versus the ~~first~~second quarter of ~~2006. Despite strong market demand, sales~~2006 to record levels. Sales volumes ~~decreased slightly~~were flat as ~~seasonal planned maintenance outages impacted production levels.~~increases in printing paper and form shipments were offset by decreases in cut size and envelope paper shipments. Average price realizations were up for uncoated freesheet papers reflecting the full realization of previously announced price increases for both roll and cut-size paper product lines. ~~Raw material~~Input costs for wood ~~natural gas~~ and ~~caustic soda~~energy were ~~favorable~~unfavorable during the ~~quarter, partially offset by the effects of higher oil prices.~~quarter. Freight costs remained high, while manufacturing operations were favorable for the ~~quarter.~~quarter reflecting seasonally lower energy consumption and fewer planned maintenance outages.

Earnings were also significantly higher than in the second quarter of 2005. Sales volumes were up for all product categories of imaging and printing papers and converting grades. Strong product demand in the quarter resulted in no market-related downtime, compared with 110,000 tons taken in the secondthird quarter of 2005. Average sales prices were higher asreflecting the benefits from price increases announced earlier in 2006. Sales volumes were up, reflecting improvements in cut size and printing papers and envelopes, while forms volumes declined slightly. Strong product demand in the ~~first~~2006 quarter resulted in virtually no market-related downtime, compared with 173,000 tons taken in the third quarter of ~~2006 were realized.~~2005. However, ~~input costs for~~ wood, ~~oil, coal and starch~~energy and freight costs were all above 2005 levels. Manufacturing operations were favorable, benefiting from improved machine performance and energy conservation efforts. In addition, operating results for the ~~second~~third quarter of 2005 included a ~~$17~~$6 million special charge for severance and other charges related to the indefinite shutdown of three paper ~~machines.~~machines, and a $3 million special charge for environmental reserves.

Looking ahead to the ~~third~~2006 fourth quarter, earnings are expected to ~~further improve~~be slightly lower. Average sales price realizations will be slightly higher with ~~the continued realization~~a full quarter of ~~previously announced~~realizations of previous price ~~increases, particularly the cut-size paper increase announced at the end of the second quarter. Sales volumes~~announcements. Scheduled maintenance outages are expected to increase costs, as will seasonally higher energy consumption. Natural gas prices are expected to average slightly with the expected seasonal increase in demand. Input costs should be about flat despite slightly higher wood costs; however, further increases in freight and distribution expenses are anticipated due, in part, to an announced July rail price increase.lower.

European Papers earnings for the ~~second~~third quarter of 2006 were ~~nearly 40% higher than in~~essentially flat with the 2006 ~~first~~second quarter. Sales volumes ~~declined slightly, largely due to tight inventory conditions~~increased primarily in Eastern Europe as the ~~quarter began.~~inventory supply constraints that limited the

second-quarter shipments were eliminated. Average sales prices were ~~higher, primarily in Russia.~~lower as a result of an increased mix of lower price exports. Input costs were favorable due to lower energy and wood costs. ~~Higher production coupled with the lower sales volumes resulted in improved inventory levels by the end of the quarter.~~Manufacturing operations costs were higher due to planned maintenance outages. Earnings ~~also~~ improved versus the 2005 ~~second~~third quarter as higher average price realizations and ~~slightly~~ higher sales volumes were only partially offset by increased input costs for energy and wood.

Entering the 2006 ~~third~~fourth quarter, European Papers’ earnings are expected to ~~further~~ improve, primarily as a result of ~~continued good demand and seasonally~~ higher sales volumes for ~~both~~pulp and paper and ~~board, and improved product inventories. Average~~higher average sales ~~prices and~~price realizations. Some increases in manufacturing costs are anticipated due to seasonally higher energy usage plus higher input costs ~~are expected to be comparable to the 2006 second quarter.~~for wood.

Brazilian Paperearnings for the ~~second~~third quarter of 2006 were ~~down slightly from~~lower than the 2006 first quarter. Sales volumes declined due to lower uncoated freesheet paper and chip sales. Average sales price realizations for uncoated freesheet and coated groundwood papers also declined. Raw material costs were favorable due to lower energy and chemical prices. Earnings alsosecond quarter, which had benefited from an $8 million favorable settlement of a Brazilian tax matter. Sales volumes increased due to higher uncoated freesheet paper and chip shipments. Average sales price realizations for wood chips and exported uncoated freesheet paper also increased, and input costs were favorable due to lower natural gas prices. Compared to the ~~second~~third quarter of 2005, earnings ~~improved~~declined in the

~~second~~ third quarter of 2006. Sales volumes were lower, reflecting the absence of a large bulk timber sale that occurred in the third quarter of 2005 and lower wood chip shipments, partially offset by higher ~~primarily~~uncoated freesheet paper sales. Average sales price realizations for uncoated freesheet ~~paper. Average sales prices~~paper and wood chips were higher. Manufacturing operations and raw material costs were slightly favorable.

With the completion of the sale of the Brazilian Coated Papers business in the 2006 third quarter, the operating results of this business are now included in discontinued operations for paper also increased with the biggest improvements in uncoated freesheet and coated groundwood papers. These benefits were partially offset by the impacts of unfavorable exchange rates and a planned coated paper’s outage.all periods presented.

Looking ahead to the ~~third~~fourth quarter, ~~operating results~~earnings are expected to be ~~flat. Benefits from~~lower reflecting costs associated with a planned recovery boiler outage. Excluding these costs, earnings would be higher than in the third quarter of 2006. Sales volumes and average sales ~~volume increases~~price realizations are expected to improve, primarily for uncoated freesheet paper, ~~coated groundwood paper and chips, plus some improvements in price realizations for coated groundwood and uncoated papers, are expected to be offset by lower tax settlements. Raw material prices~~while input costs should be about flat.

Market Pulpearnings in the U.S. in the ~~second~~third quarter of 2006 were higher than in the ~~first~~second quarter of 2006. Sales volumes ~~were essentially flat. Average~~decreased slightly as lower fluff pulp volume was partially offset by higher paper and tissue pulp shipments. However, average price realizations were up over the prior quarter, reflecting an increase in both softwood and hardwood pulp prices in the second quarter and an additional increase in softwood pulp prices in the third quarter. ~~The benefits of slightly favorable raw~~Raw material costs were ~~largely~~slightly favorable, but were offset by ~~increased distribution~~higher freight costs. Compared with the ~~second~~third quarter of 2005, earnings in the ~~second~~third quarter of 2006 improved due largely to higher average sales price realizations. Sales volumes declined ~~primarily~~ due to lower paper and tissue pulp shipments, partially offset by higher ~~input~~fluff pulp shipments. Input costs for wood and energy and less favorable manufacturing operations. Sales volumes were essentially flat, with increased fluff pulp shipments offsetting lower market pulp shipments. Average sales prices increased, reflecting higher average prices for bleached hardwood pulp shipments to Europe and higher softwood pulp prices.increased. Earnings are expected to ~~improve further~~be essentially flat in the ~~third~~fourth quarter of 2006 as the benefits from further realizations of the softwood pulp price increase announced ~~price increases for softwood and hardwood pulp begin to be realized.~~in September are offset by higher wood costs.

TheU.S. ~~Coated Papers~~earnings in the second quarter of 2006 increased compared with the first quarter of 2006. Results included a $31 million reduction in depreciation expense to reflect the treatment of the business as held for sale. Sales volumes and average sales prices were essentially flat; however, input costs for energy and wood were lower. Manufacturing operations improved over the prior quarter. Earnings decreased compared with the second quarter of 2005 as benefits from increases in average sales price realizations and favorable manufacturing operations were offset by increased input costs for energy. Sales volumes were flat. The Coated and Supercalendered Papersbusiness was sold in the third quarter of 2006. Earnings for the quarter include the operating results for this business for the month of July. Earnings for the second quarter of 2006 and for the third quarter of 2005 reflected full three-month operations.


	2006						2005						2006						2005
*In millions*	2nd Quarter		1st Quarter		Six Months		2nd Quarter		1st Quarter		Six Months		3rd Quarter		2nd Quarter		Nine Months		3rd Quarter		2nd Quarter		Nine Months
Sales	$	1,240	$	1,170	$	2,410	$	1,165	$	1,215	$	2,380	$	1,250	$	1,240	$	3,660	$	1,075	$	1,165	$	3,455
Operating Profit		100		38		138		84		102		186		138		100		277		29		84		215

Industrial Packaging net sales for the third quarter of 2006 were about even with the second quarter of 2006, but were 6%16% higher than in ~~both~~ the ~~first quarter of 2006 and the second~~third quarter of 2005. Operating profits in the ~~second~~third quarter of 2006 were ~~more than double those of the first quarter of 2006, and 19%~~38% higher than in the second quarter of 2006, and significantly higher than in the third quarter of 2005.

Containerboard earnings in the ~~second~~third quarter of 2006 increased significantly compared with the ~~first~~second quarter of 2006. Average sales price realizations increased during the quarter, reflecting ~~price increases announced in~~ the ~~first quarter plus some~~full realization of ~~an additional increase~~previously announced ~~in April.~~price increases. Third-party sales volumes were ~~slightly lower as more production was used by our converting operations.~~higher due to increased availability of product resulting from higher mill production. Raw material costs were favorable, reflecting lower average wood, coal and natural gas costs. Manufacturing costs were also ~~favorable reflecting~~favorably impacted by improved machine performance and ~~reliability.~~fewer planned maintenance outages. However, freight costs remained high during the quarter. Earnings ~~also~~ increased significantly in the 2006 ~~second~~third quarter compared with the 2005 ~~second~~third quarter. Sales volumes were higher as no market-related downtime was taken in the 2006 ~~second~~third quarter versus ~~140,000~~50,000 tons of market related downtime taken in the ~~second~~third quarter of 2005. Average sales prices were significantly higher, reflecting the realization of ~~previously announced~~ price ~~increases.~~increases in late 2005 and 2006. The impacts of higher costs for freight and energy were more than offset by lower costs for raw materials and the benefits from improved manufacturing operations.

Entering the ~~third~~fourth quarter, earnings are expected to ~~continue to improve. Average~~decline slightly. Sales volumes and average sales ~~prices~~price realizations for the quarter should ~~increase with the realization of the full impact of the price increase announced in April. Raw~~improve. However, raw material costs ~~for wood~~ are expected to ~~continue to improve, although distribution costs~~be higher, and manufacturing costs ~~(reflecting scheduled maintenance outages)~~ are projected to ~~be unfavorable.~~rise reflecting planned maintenance outages.

U.S. Convertingearnings for the 2006 ~~second~~third quarter were ~~higher~~significantly lower than in the ~~first~~second quarter of 2006. Sales volumes ~~increased despite fewer shipping days during~~decreased due to softer demand in the ~~period, reflecting solid demand for packaging products. Average~~southeastern and south central markets. Improved average sales prices for container products ~~improved during~~reflected the ~~quarter;~~partial realization of previously announced price increases; however, these increases ~~were less than the~~lagged increases in ~~average containerboard costs,~~the cost of linerboard, resulting in lower average margins. Manufacturing operations were ~~favorable, reflecting improved run rates and lower~~unfavorable due to higher maintenance spending. Input costs for utilities, raw materials and distribution were ~~favorable due to lower utility costs, slightly offset by higher raw material costs. Earnings also improved~~higher. Compared with the third quarter of 2005, earnings in the ~~second~~third quarter of 2006 ~~compared with the 2005 second quarter.~~were also lower. Sales volumes were ~~higher. Average~~higher, but average margins were down as average sales prices were not sufficient to offset increased board costs. Input costs for ~~boxes~~raw materials and distribution were higher ~~than in~~as were the ~~second quarter~~costs of 2005, and exceeded the increase in containerboard costs, resulting in slightly higher margins. Distribution, utility and raw material costs increased compared with 2005. Operating costs were favorable, reflecting the benefits of plant rationalizations and run-rate improvements.manufacturing operations.

Entering the ~~third~~fourth quarter, earnings are expected to ~~decline~~improve with slightly ~~due to a seasonal decrease in~~higher average sales ~~volumes~~price realizations and ~~continuing pressure on margins. Distribution, utility and raw material costs are also expected to be higher in the third quarter.~~better manufacturing operations.

European Container earnings for the 2006 ~~second~~third quarter ~~improved~~increased compared with the ~~first~~second quarter of ~~2006.~~2006 due principally to a $13 million pre-tax gain on the sale of property in Spain. Sales volumes ~~increased,~~decreased, reflecting seasonal ~~strengthening~~softness in the European agricultural ~~business. Average sales prices improved, but were not able to counterbalance the effects~~business mainly affecting operations in Spain and Morocco. The impact of ~~continued increases~~lower volume was softened by an increase in ~~containerboard costs.~~margins. Input costs for energy were ~~favorable.~~favorable for the second quarter in a row. Compared with the ~~second~~third quarter of 2005, earnings ~~decreased. Sales~~increased due to the property sale in Spain. Otherwise, sales volumes were ~~flat. Containerboard costs increased faster~~lower and containerboard cost increases were greater than the increase in container average sales ~~prices.~~prices, resulting in lower margins. Energy costs were also unfavorable when compared with the 2005 second quarter. However, earnings contributions from the Moroccan box plant acquisition in the fourth quarter of 2005 favorably impacted 2006 second quarter results.higher than 2005. Looking ahead to the ~~third~~fourth quarter, excluding the effect of the third-quarter gain in Spain, earnings are expected to improve significantly as ~~benefits~~sales volumes benefit from ~~improved price realizations more than offset~~ the ~~effects of seasonally lower sales volumes.~~European fruit and vegetable season and margins also improve. Energy costs are expected to average about the same as in the ~~second~~third quarter.


	2006						2005						2006						2005
*In millions*	2nd Quarter		1st Quarter		Six Months		2nd Quarter		1st Quarter		Six Months		3rd Quarter		2nd Quarter		Nine Months		3rd Quarter		2nd Quarter		Nine Months
Sales	$	795	$	775	$	1,570	$	790	$	740	$	1,530	$	855	$	795	$	2,425	$	785	$	790	$	2,290
Operating Profit		41		35		76		53		32		85		64		41		140		43		53		128

Consumer Packaging net sales for the third quarter of 2006 were 8% higher than in the second quarter of 2006 ~~were 3%~~and 9% higher than in the ~~first quarter of 2006 and essentially even with the second~~third quarter of 2005. Operating profits in the ~~second~~third quarter of 2006 were ~~17%~~56% higher ~~than in the first quarter of 2006, but 23% lower~~ than in the second quarter of 2006, and 48% higher than in the third quarter of 2005.

Coated Paperboard earnings for bleached packaging board and coated bristols in the ~~second~~third quarter of 2006 exceeded ~~first-quarter~~second-quarter 2006 levels. Sales volumes increased, primarily in the folding carton board product line. Average sales prices were also up, mainly for cupstock and folding carton board. ~~Favorable input~~Input costs, ~~reflected lower natural gas,~~however, were unfavorable, reflecting higher wood and polyethylene costs. Manufacturing operations were ~~slightly unfavorable.~~favorable, due to improved energy usage and significantly better system performance and reliability. Compared with the 2005 ~~second~~third quarter, earnings in the ~~second~~third quarter of 2006 were ~~slightly lower.~~significantly higher. The favorable impacts of increased sales volumes, ~~and~~ higher average sales prices ~~were~~and improved manufacturing operations more than offset ~~by increased~~the effects of higher distribution ~~energy~~ and ~~polyethylene~~input costs. Operating results are expected to ~~improve~~soften in the 2006 ~~third~~fourth quarter. Sales volumes for bleached board products and coated bristols are expected to ~~decline slightly,~~be seasonally lower, but average price realizations should continue to ~~improve, reflecting previously announced price increases for cupstock and folding carton board. Manufacturing operations are~~improve. Planned maintenance outages should also ~~expected to improve.~~unfavorably impact manufacturing costs.

Foodservice Packagingearnings increased in the ~~second~~third quarter of 2006 compared with the ~~first~~second quarter of 2006. Sales volumes were seasonally ~~higher, and~~lower, but average sales prices increased ~~slightly.~~slightly as price increases were implemented in certain annual contracts. Raw material costs ~~declined slightly,~~were higher, reflecting ~~favorable~~ resin ~~costs.~~and uncoated bleached board cost increases. Operating costs were ~~unfavorable, but these effects were partially offset by decreased production downtime.~~favorable. Compared with the ~~second~~third quarter of 2005, sales volumes were ~~relatively flat. Average~~down, but average sales prices were higher ~~reflecting~~as a result of the realization of announced price increases. Raw material costs were unfavorable ~~as the result of~~due to higher bleached board and resin costs. Entering the ~~third~~2006 fourth quarter, sales volumes are expected to ~~improve slightly.~~be flat. Average sales price realizations should ~~also~~ continue to ~~increase. However,~~increase, as will raw material costs with a full-quarter impact of a September increase in coated bleached board costs. As a result, overall earnings are expected to ~~increase due to higher bleached board and resin costs.~~be slightly lower than in the third quarter.

Shorewood Packaging earnings for the third quarter of 2006 improved compared with the second quarter of 2006, ~~declined compared with the first quarter of 2006 primarily due to the~~which had included a write-off of equipment that was removed from production. Sales volumes increased in the tobacco, consumer products and ~~display segments, but these favorable effects were~~home entertainment segments; however, this benefit was partially offset by ~~a decline~~lower demand in the display segment. A weaker mix in the home entertainment segment ~~sales.~~resulted in lower margins. Manufacturing operating costs were ~~unfavorable~~favorable due ~~in part,~~ to ~~start-up costs for a new rotary press.~~efficiency gains and performance improvements at the home entertainment plants. Compared with the ~~second~~third quarter of 2005, the benefits from ~~strong~~stronger tobacco and consumer products demand were partially offset by the effects of weaker ~~consumer products~~display and home entertainment sales. Operating costs were ~~higher and~~flat, while raw ~~materials~~material costs were unfavorable due to bleached board cost increases. As the ~~third~~2006 fourth quarter begins, earnings are expected to increase, ~~significantly with seasonally higher~~although seasonal improvement in sales volumes in the home entertainment ~~segment. Improvements in converting costs~~segment are anticipated ~~as the new rotary press begins normal production.~~to be weaker than in previous years.

Beverage Packagingearnings increased in the ~~second~~third quarter of 2006 compared with the ~~first~~second quarter of 2006. Sales volumes for converted products ~~increased, primarily in Asia, but~~ were ~~partially offset by a decrease in~~flat, however third-party sales volumes ~~for~~improved with increases in liquid packaging board and coated groundwood ~~papers. Average sales prices increased.~~papers shipments from the Pine Bluff, Arkansas mill. Input costs were ~~lower,~~slightly higher, primarily due to ~~improved natural gas and purchased steam~~higher polyethylene prices. Manufacturing operations ~~at the mill~~ were favorable, reflecting reduced maintenance spending and ~~reduced~~improved energy ~~chemical and fiber~~ usage. Converting plant operations were ~~also favorable~~unfavorable in both North America and Asia. ~~Earnings~~Compared with the third quarter of 2005, earnings for the ~~second~~2006 third quarter ~~of 2006~~ were higher ~~than the second quarter of 2005~~ largely due to higher average prices for liquid packaging board and coated groundwood papers. Sales volumes were lower across the ~~business, while~~business. Mill manufacturing costs were ~~flat.~~favorable due to improved productivity and energy efficiency improvements. Raw material costs for polyethylene and board were higher. Looking forward to the ~~third~~2006 fourth quarter, earnings are expected to ~~improve~~decrease principally due to ~~higher~~seasonally lower shipments of coated groundwood papers.


	2006						2005						2006						2005
*In millions*	2nd Quarter		1st Quarter		Six Months		2nd Quarter		1st Quarter		Six Months		3rd Quarter		2nd Quarter		Nine Months		3rd Quarter		2nd Quarter		Nine Months
Sales	$	1,690	$	1,650	$	3,340	$	1,570	$	1,530	$	3,100	$	1,730	$	1,690	$	5,070	$	1,645	$	1,570	$	4,745
Operating Profit		36		27		63		18		18		36		34		36		97		23		18		59

Distribution’s 2006 ~~second-quarter~~third-quarter sales were up 2% compared with the ~~first~~second quarter of 2006, and up 8%5% compared with the third quarter of 2005. Operating profits were down 6% in the third quarter of 2006 compared with the second quarter of ~~2005. Operating profits were up 33% in the second quarter of~~ 2006, and 48% higher compared with the ~~first~~third quarter of ~~2006, and doubled compared with the second quarter of~~ 2005.

Compared with the very strong 2006 ~~first~~second quarter, earnings were ~~higher~~only slightly lower in the 2006 ~~second~~third quarter. Sales volumes were flat overall as volume increases in the ~~facilities supplies and~~ packaging ~~segments~~segment were offset by declines in ~~the printing and graphics~~other segments. Average sales prices were higher in all segments, however margins were slightly lower. Operating expenses were essentially flat. Compared with the third quarter of 2005, earnings for the 2006 third quarter were much higher. Sales volumes were up with increases in the packaging segment only partially offset by decreases in the printing and facility supplies segments. Average sales prices increased approximately 5% across all segments. Operating expenses were favorable, ~~due~~reflecting lower current period labor costs as a result of restructuring activities, the absence of the prior year charges incurred to ~~lower utilities, decreased legal costs~~accomplish this restructuring, and lower labor costs reflecting organizational restructurings. Compared with 2005 second-quarter results, sales volumes and average sales prices for all segments improved significantly. Operating expenses were favorable, reflecting benefits from facility realignments and cost reduction actions that began in the second half of 2005.legal expenses.

Looking forward, operating results in the ~~third~~fourth quarter are expected to ~~continue~~decline due to ~~be strong with~~seasonally weaker sales ~~volumes and prices comparable to second-quarter levels.~~volume.


	2006									2005									2006									2005
*In millions*	2nd Quarter			1st Quarter			Six Months			2nd Quarter			1st Quarter			Six Months			3rd Quarter			2nd Quarter			Nine Months			3rd Quarter			2nd Quarter			Nine Months
Sales	$	595		$	630		$	1,225		$	605		$	610		$	1,215		$	445		$	595		$	1,670		$	700		$	605		$	1,915

Operating Profit:
Forest Resources-
Sales of Forestlands		101			103			204			67			69			136			125			101			329			125			67			261
Harvest & Recreational Income		61			72			133			62			69			131			63			61			196			63			62			194
Forestland Expenses		(31	)		(29	)		(60	)		(39	)		(34	)		(73	)		(27	)		(31	)		(87	)		(43	)		(39	)		(116	)
Real Estate Operations		29			45			74			39			54			93			5			29			79			65			39			158
Wood Products		24			35			59			62			49			111			(37	)		24			22			61			62			172

Operating Profit	$	184		$	226		$	410		$	191		$	207		$	398		$	129		$	184		$	539		$	271		$	191		$	669

Forest Products net sales in the ~~second~~third quarter of 2006 were ~~6% lower than in the first quarter of 2006 and 2%~~25% lower than in the second quarter of 2006 and 36% lower than in the third quarter of 2005. Operating profits in the third quarter of 2006 were 30% lower than in the second quarter of 2006, and were ~~19%~~52% lower than in the ~~first quarter of 2006, and were 4% lower than in the second~~third quarter of 2005.

Forest ResourcesU.S. harvest and recreational income ~~declined~~increased slightly versus the 2006 ~~first~~second quarter ~~due to lower~~reflecting a slight increase in harvest ~~volumes as the effects of lower average stumpage pricing offset the benefits from a better product mix.~~volumes. Gross margins from forestland and timber lease sales in the ~~second~~third quarter of 2006 ~~were essentially flat. Profits~~increased by $24 million, but this benefit was offset by a $24 million decrease in profits from sales of higher-and-better-use real estate ~~properties decreased by $16 million.~~properties. Compared with the 2005 ~~second~~third quarter, harvest and recreational income was ~~about flat. Harvest~~flat although harvest volumes were ~~lower, but this impact was partially offset by a favorable product mix.~~higher. Gross margins on forestland sales ~~increased $34 million due to a significant increase in per-acre pricing, offsetting a decline in total acreage sold.~~were also flat, but earnings from sales of higher-and-better use properties were down $60 million. Forestland operating expenses in the ~~second~~third quarter of 2006 were $8$16 million ~~better~~lower than in the ~~second~~third quarter of 2005, reflecting ~~expenses included in~~the effects of operational improvements implemented since 2005 ~~for the office relocation~~and some non-recurring 2005 cost items. Looking ahead to ~~Memphis. For~~ the 2006 ~~third~~fourth quarter, ~~a slight increase in timber harvest volumes is anticipated. However, expected improvement in profits from~~the anticipated closing of the remaining announced Transformation Plan forestland sales are expected to eliminate over 85% of timberland ownership during the fourth quarter. Forestland sales from remaining holdings should remain strong in the fourth quarter, however future earnings can be ~~offset by~~expected to begin to decline due to the lower ~~profits~~contributions from ~~higher-and-better-use real estate~~harvest and forestland sales and ~~seasonally higher forest operation expenses.~~lower recreational income.

In March and April of 2006, the Company announced agreements for the future sales of approximately 5.7 million acres, or over 85% of its U.S. forestlands, for proceeds of approximately $6.6 billion. A portion of these sales were completed in ~~June~~the third quarter 2006 for proceeds of ~~$97~~$400 million, resulting in a pre-tax gain of $304 million. In the second quarter of 2006, sales totaling of $97 million were completed, resulting in a pre-tax gain of $62 ~~million that is~~million. These gains are included in Net (gains) losses on sales and impairments of businesses ~~held for sale~~ in the accompanying consolidated statement of operations. The remaining sales are expected to be completed during the fourth quarter of 2006. The completion of these sales transactions can be expected to significantly reduce the future operating earnings of this segment.

Wood Productsearnings in the ~~second~~third quarter of 2006 decreased significantly compared with the first quarter of 2006, reflecting declines in both lumber and plywood earnings. Earnings in both segments were positively impacted by higher sales volumes, lower wood costs and lower manufacturing costs, but these benefits were more than offset by lower average sales prices. Compared with the second quarter of ~~2005, earnings declined significantly, primarily in the lumber business. Average~~2006 as sales prices for both lumber and plywood declined ~~sharply reflecting reduced demand in~~to the ~~housing market. In addition,~~lowest levels of the ~~lumber segment was negatively~~current cycle. Sales volumes were also down, and manufacturing costs were unfavorably impacted by a reduced production schedule. However, input costs for wood and chips were favorable. Compared with the third quarter of 2005, earnings were also significantly lower as the result of the declines in sales prices. The impacts of lower sales volumes and higher ~~wood and~~ manufacturing ~~costs. In the plywood segment, sales volumes increased, but this favorable impact was more than~~costs were partially offset by lower ~~average sales prices. Benefits from favorable~~input costs for wood ~~costs were offset by unfavorable manufacturing costs.~~and chips. Entering the ~~third~~fourth quarter, ~~lower earnings are expected in both segments as~~ average sales prices ~~continue to decline, particularly in lumber markets. Sales volumes are anticipated to increase slightly and wood costs should be slightly favorable. Manufacturing costs~~ are expected to ~~approximate second~~average lower than in the 2006 third quarter, although market prices for lumber and plywood are not expected to decline much below third-quarter levels. Manufacturing costs will continue to reflect the negative impact of reduced production levels as well as holiday scheduling. Input costs should continue to be favorable.


	2006						2005						2006						2005
*In millions*	2nd Quarter		1st Quarter		Six Months		2nd Quarter		1st Quarter		Six Months		3rd Quarter		2nd Quarter		Nine Months		3rd Quarter			2nd Quarter		Nine Months
Sales	$	235	$	230	$	465	$	230	$	275	$	505	$	245	$	235	$	710	$	220		$	230	$	725
Operating Profit		16		10		26		7		10		17		22		16		48		(8	)		7		9

The Specialty Businesses and Other segment principally includes the operating results of Arizona Chemical, as well as certain smaller businesses. ~~Second~~Net sales for the third quarter of 2006 ~~net sales~~ were 2%4% higher than in ~~both~~ the ~~first~~second quarter of 2006, and 11% higher than in the ~~second~~third quarter of 2005. Earnings in the 2006 ~~second~~third quarter were up 38% from the second quarter of 2006, and were up significantly ~~from both~~compared with the ~~2006 first~~third quarter ~~and the 2005 second quarter.~~of 2005.

Earnings for Arizona Chemical for the third quarter of 2006 improved from the second quarter of 2006 ~~increased significantly from the first quarter of 2006 reflecting robust~~as average sales ~~prices with~~price realizations increased in both the ~~realization~~U.S. and Europe. This favorable impact was largely offset by the effects of ~~second-quarter price increases. Benefits from improved~~higher input costs for energy and ~~favorable manufacturing costs were partially offset by~~crude tall oil (CTO), lower sales volumes, and higher ~~input~~manufacturing costs in Europe. Gains from property and equipment sales in the 2006 third quarter accounted for ~~crude tall oil (CTO).~~essentially all of the improvement in earnings. Compared with the ~~second~~third quarter of 2005, earnings improved due to higher average sales prices and favorable manufacturing costs, and the gain on land and equipment sales, partially offset by lower sales volumes and increased costs for CTO. The third quarter of 2005 also included a $13 million special charge related to a plant shutdown in Norway. Looking ahead to the ~~third~~fourth quarter of 2006, earnings ~~should continue to improve as both sales volumes and price realizations~~ are expected to ~~increase slightly.~~decrease as input costs continue to increase. However, improved average sales price realizations and better manufacturing operations should be favorable factors.

Cash provided by continuing operations totaled ~~$865 million~~$1.6 billion for the first ~~six~~nine months of 2006, up from ~~$543 million~~$0.9 billion for the comparable 2005 ~~six-month~~nine-month period, reflecting higher earnings ~~adjusted~~after adjustments for non-cash charges and lower increases in working capital ~~components for the 2006 six-month period.~~requirements.

Investments in capital projects totaled ~~$501~~$802 million for the first ~~six~~nine months of 2006 compared with ~~$487~~$756 million in the first ~~six~~nine months of 2005. Full-year 2006 capital spending is expected to be approximately $1.2 billion, or about equal to depreciation and amortization expense. Also during the 2006 nine-month period, approximately $2.2 billion of cash was generated from divestitures compared with approximately $1.4 billion in the first nine months of 2005.

Financing activities for the first ~~six~~nine months of 2006 included a ~~$1.4~~$1.9 billion net decrease in debt ~~versus~~compared with a ~~$1.0~~$2.3 billion net decrease ~~during~~in the ~~comparable~~ 2005 ~~six-month~~nine-month period. OnIn August 2006, International Paper used

approximately $320 million of cash to repay its maturing 5.375% euro-denominated notes that were designated as a hedge of euro functional currency net investments. Other debt activity in the third quarter included the repayment of $143 million of 7.875% notes and $96 million of 7% debentures, all maturing within the quarter.

In June ~~20,~~ 2006, International Paper paid approximately $1.2 billion to repurchase substantially all of its zero-coupon convertible debentures at a price equal to their accreted principal value plus interest, using proceeds from divestitures and $730 million of third party commercial paper issued under the Company’s receivables securitization program. As of ~~June~~September 30, 2006, International Paper had ~~repaid $120 million of~~reduced this commercial paper borrowing by a net of $30 million, reflecting repayments of second-quarter borrowings less amounts required for the “Dutch Auction” tender offer in September, and plans to repay the remainder by the end of ~~this year. First quarter~~2006.

In February 2006, ~~activity included the repurchase of~~International Paper repurchased $195 million 6.4% debentures with an original maturity date of February ~~2026 and~~2026. Other reductions in the first quarter 2006 included early payment of approximately $495 million of notes with coupon rates ranging from 4% to 8.875% and original maturities from 2007 to 2029. Pre-tax early debt retirement costs of $8 million related to first quarter 2006 debt reductions are included in Restructuring and other charges in the accompanying consolidated statement of operations.

In September 2005, International Paper used some of the proceeds from the CHH sale to repay the remaining $250 million portion of a subsidiary’s $650 million long-term debt with an interest rate of LIBOR plus 62.5 basis points and a maturity date of June 2007, and $312 million of commercial paper that had been issued in the same quarter. Other reductions in the third quarter of 2005 included $662 million of notes with coupon rates ranging from 4% to 7.35% and original maturities from 2009 to 2029, and the repayment of $150 million of 7.10% notes with a maturity of September 2005.

In the second quarter of 2005, International Paper repatriated approximately $1.2 billion in cash from certain of its foreign subsidiaries, including amounts under the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004. In June 2005, International Paper used approximately $400 million of cash available after the repatriations to repay a portion of a subsidiary’s long-term debt with an interest rate of LIBOR plus 62.5 basis points and a maturity date of June 2007. First-quarter 2005 activity included the redemption in February of the outstanding $464 million of International Paper Capital Trust 5.25% convertible subordinated debentures at 100.5% of par plus accrued interest, and early payment of approximately $295 million of notes with coupon rates ranging from 4% to 7.875% and original maturities from 2006 to 2015.

At December 31, 2005, International Paper classified as Long-term debt $1.25 billion of tenderable bonds, commercial paper and bank notes and current maturities of long-term debt. International Paper had the intent and ability, through its fully committed credit facilities, to renew or convert these obligations.

In July 2006, in connection with the planned use of projected proceeds from the Company’s Transformation Plan, International Paper’s Board of Directors authorized a share repurchase program to acquire up to $3.0 billion of the Company’s stock. In a modified “Dutch Auction” tender offer completed in September 2006, International Paper purchased 38,465,260 shares of its common stock at a price of $36.00 per share, plus costs to acquire the shares, for a total cost of approximately $1.4 billion.

In the first ~~six~~nine months of 2006, approximately ~~2.6~~2.8 million shares of common stock were issued for various incentive plans, including stock option exercises that generated ~~$21~~$26 million of cash and restricted stock that did not generate cash. During the first ~~six~~nine months of 2005, approximately 3.0 million shares of common stock were issued for various incentive plans, including stock option exercises that generated ~~$19~~$20 million of cash and restricted stock that did not generate cash. Common stock dividend payments totaled ~~$247~~$372 million and ~~$246~~$368 million for the first ~~six~~nine months of 2006 and 2005, respectively. Dividends were ~~$.50~~$.75 per share for both periods.

Maintaining ana strong investment-grade credit rating is an important element of International Paper’s corporate finance strategy. In the third quarter of 2006, Standard & Poor’s (S&P) revised the outlook on the Company’s long-term credit ratings from BBB negative to stable outlook and upgraded its short-term credit rating from A-3 to A-2. At ~~June~~September 30, 2006, the Company also held a long-term credit ~~ratings~~rating of ~~BBB (negative outlook) and~~ Baa3 (stable outlook) ~~by Standard & Poor’s (S&P)~~ and a short-term credit rating P-3 from Moody’s Investor ~~Services (Moody’s), respectively. The Company currently has short-term credit ratings by S&P and Moody’s of A-3 and P-3, respectively.~~Services.

International Paper expects to be able to meet projected capital expenditures, service existing debt and meet working capital and dividend requirements during 2006 through cash from operations and divestiture proceeds, supplemented as required by its various existing credit facilities.

At ~~June~~September 30, 2006, International Paper has approximately $3.2 billion of committed liquidity, including contractually committed bank credit agreements and a receivables securitization program. In March 2006, International Paper replaced its maturing $750 million revolving bank credit agreement with a 364-day $500 million fully committed revolving bank credit agreement that expires in March 2007 and has a facility fee of 0.08% payable quarterly, and replaced its $1.25 billion revolving bank credit agreement with a $1.5 billion fully committed revolving bank credit agreement that expires in March 2011 and has a facility fee of 0.10% payable quarterly.The new agreements generally provide for interest rates at a floating rate index plus a pre-determined margin dependent upon International Paper’s credit rating. At ~~June~~September 30, 2006, International Paper had ~~$610~~$700 million of outstanding borrowings under its receivables securitization program and no outstanding borrowings under the fully committed revolving bank credit agreements. Additionally, International Paper Investments (Luxembourg) S.ar.l, a wholly-owned subsidiary of International Paper, has a $100 million revolving bank credit agreement that expires in November 2006 with approximately ~~$30~~$46 million in associated borrowings outstanding as of ~~June~~September 30, 2006.

On October 25, 2006, the Company amended its existing receivables securitization program that provided up to $1.2 billion of commercial paper-based financings with a facility fee of 0.20% and an expiration date in November 2007, to provide up to $1 billion of available commercial paper-based financings with a facility fee of 0.10% and an expiration date in October 2009.

The Company will continue to rely upon debt and capital markets for the majority of any necessary funding not provided by operating cash flow or divestiture proceeds. Funding decisions will be guided by our capital structure planning and liability management practices. The primary goals of the Company’s capital structure planning are to maximize financial flexibility and preserve liquidity while reducing interest expense. The majority of International Paper’s debt is accessed through global public capital markets where we have a wide base of investors.

In July, 2005, International Paper announced a plan to transform its business portfolio to concentrate on two key global platform businesses: ~~uncoated papers~~Uncoated Papers (including ~~distribution)~~Distribution) and ~~packaging.~~Packaging. The plan also focuses on improving shareholder return through mill realignments in those two businesses, additional cost improvements and exploring strategic options for other businesses, including possible sale or spin-off.

In connection with this plan, the Company completed the sale of its 50.5% interest in Carter Holt Harvey Limited for $1.1 billion in the third quarter of 2005. In addition, in March and April of 2006, International Paper announced agreements for future sales in 2006 of approximately 5.7 million acres of U.S. forestlands for proceeds of approximately $6.6 billion. During the second ~~quarter~~and third quarters of 2006, the Company completed sales of approximately ~~75 thousand~~552,000 acres of these forestlands for approximately ~~$97~~$498 million, including an installment note receivable of $136 million, resulting in ~~a gain~~pre-tax gains of approximately ~~$62~~$366 million. ~~The remaining announced forestland sales are expected to be completed by~~In October and November, following the end of ~~2006. These forestlands had a carrying value~~the 2006 third quarter, International Paper completed two additional previously announced sales of approximately ~~$1.7~~5.1 million acres of forestlands for proceeds totaling approximately $6.1 billion ~~at June 30, 2006.~~

35of cash and notes. These sales will result in an estimated special fourth-quarter pre-tax gain in excess of $4 billion. With the closing of this sale, proceeds from Transformation Plan forestlands sales now total $6.6 billion.

~~Also during~~In the 2006 second quarter, the Company announced the signing of definitive agreements to sell its Coated and Supercalendered Papers business for approximately $1.4 billion, and its Kraft Papers business for approximately $155 million plus two additional future payments of up to $60 million contingent upon business performance, with the estimated proceeds from both sales subject to certain closing and post-closing adjustments. The sale of the Coated and Supercalendered Papers business was completed in the 2006 third quarter, with the Kraft Papers sale expected to close in late 2006 or early 2007. Also in the third quarter, the Company completed the sale of its Brazilian Coated Papers business to Stora Enso Oyj for approximately $420 million, subject to certain post-closing adjustments. The Company continues to evaluate ~~alternatives~~strategic options for its Beverage Packaging, Wood Products ~~Beverage Packaging,~~ and Arizona Chemical ~~businesses and Brazilian coated paper operations.~~businesses.

International Paper currently estimates that after-tax proceeds from the above announced and possible future divestitures ~~could exceed~~will total approximately $11 billion, and expects that the proceeds from these ~~proceeds~~sales plus additional free cash flow generated from operations ~~would~~will be used as follows:

As part of the planned debt reduction, the Company is planning to make voluntary contributions to the U.S. qualified pension fund in the range of $500 million to $1.0 billion to begin satisfying longer-term funding requirements and to lower future pension expense. Pension obligations are viewed by the ratings agencies as equivalent to debt.

~~Also~~During the 2006 third quarter, in connection with the planned use of the above ~~program,~~projected proceeds, the Company ~~announced in July 2006 that its board of directors had authorized~~purchased through a ~~share repurchase program to acquire up to $3 billion~~modified “Dutch Auction” tender offer, 38,465,260 shares (or approximately 6%) of its common ~~stock.~~stock at a price of $36.00 per share, plus costs to acquire the shares, for a total cost of approximately $1.4 billion. Following the completion of this tender offer, International Paper ~~intends~~had approximately 454.8 million shares of common stock outstanding.

Also during the quarter, the Company entered into an agreement to ~~begin this program~~exchange a pulp mill project being developed in the ~~third quarter~~state of Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil (together with approximately 100,000 hectares of forestlands) for the existing Luiz Antonio pulp and ~~intends to repurchase a significant~~uncoated paper mill and approximately 60,000 hectares of forestlands located in the state of Sao Paulo, Brazil. The Company will fund the pulp mill project in the amount of ~~shares before~~U.S. $1.15 billion. This exchange transaction is expected to close by February 1, 2007.

Finally, subsequent to the end of ~~2006.~~the 2006 third quarter, International Paper and Ilim Pulp, the largest forest products enterprise in Russia, announced that a letter of intent had been signed to establish a 50-50 joint venture. If definitive agreements are reached, this joint venture would be the largest foreign-domestic alliance in the Russian forest sector. It is currently contemplated that International Paper will purchase a 50% equity interest in the joint venture for approximately $400 million in cash. The ~~$3 billion share repurchase represents approximately 20 percent~~total enterprise value of the ~~Company’s outstanding shares based on~~joint venture is approximately $1.3 billion. The parties currently expect to finalize the ~~stock price~~agreement in the next six months, following completion of ~~$32.12 per share at~~due diligence, receipt of required regulatory approvals, and the ~~time~~approvals of ~~the announcement. The Company is considering various share repurchase vehicles, including tender offers, accelerated share repurchases and/or open market purchases, with the intention~~their respective boards of ~~completing the program before the end of 2007.~~directors.

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires International Paper to establish accounting policies and to make estimates that affect both the amounts and timing of the recording of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses. Some of these estimates require judgments about matters that are inherently uncertain.

Accounting policies whose application may have a significant effect on the reported results of operations and financial position of International Paper, and that can require judgments by management that affect their

application, include SFAS No. 5, “Accounting for Contingencies,” SFAS No. 144, “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets,” SFAS No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets,” SFAS No. 87, “Employers’ Accounting for Pensions,” SFAS No. 106, “Employers’ Accounting for Postretirement Benefits Other Than Pensions,” as amended by SFAS No. 132 and 132R, “Employers’ Disclosures About Pension and Other Postretirement Benefits,” and SFAS No. 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes.”

The Company has included in its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005, a discussion of these critical accounting policies, which are important to the portrayal of the Company’s financial condition and results of operations and require management’s judgments. The Company has not made any changes in any of these critical accounting policies during the first ~~six~~nine months of 2006.

Pension Accounting. Net pension expense totaled approximately ~~$189~~$283 million for International Paper’s U.S. plans for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2006, or about ~~$67~~$101 million higher than the pension expense recorded for the first ~~six~~nine months of 2005. Net pension expense for non-U.S. plans was about $8$13 million and $11 million for the first ~~six~~nine months of 2006 and ~~2005.~~2005, respectively. The increase in U.S. plan pension expense was principally due to a change in the mortality assumption to use the Retirement Protection Act 2000 Table, an increase in the amortization of unrecognized actuarial losses over a shorter average remaining service period, and a decrease in the assumed discount rate to 5.50% in 2006 from 5.75% in 2005.

After consultation with our actuaries, International Paper determines key actuarial assumptions on December 31 of each year that are used to calculate liability information as of that date and pension expense for the following year. Key assumptions affecting pension expense include the discount rate, the expected long-term rate of return on plan assets, the expected rate of future salary increases, and various demographic assumptions including expected mortality. The discount rate assumption is determined based on a yield curve that incorporates approximately 500-550 Aa-graded bonds. The plan’s projected cash flows are then matched to the yield curve to develop the discount rate. The expected long-term rate of return on plan assets is based on projected rates of return for current and planned asset classes in the plan’s investment portfolio.

In 2006, International Paper modified its investment policy to use interest rate swap agreements to extend the duration of the Plan’s bond portfolio to better match the duration of the pension obligation, thus helping to stabilize the ratio of assets to liabilities when interest rates change. Thus, when interest rates fall, the value of the swap agreements increases directionally with increases in the pension obligation. The current portfolio is hedged at approximately 35% of the Plan’s liability, with plans to increase this ratio to 50% by no later than the end of 2008. This new strategy is not expected to alter the long-term rate of return on Plan assets. At ~~June~~September 30, 2006, the market value of plan assets for International Paper’s U.S. plans totaled approximately ~~$6.8~~$7.1 billion, consisting of approximately 59% equity securities, ~~29%~~31% fixed income securities, and ~~12%~~10% real estate and other assets.

International Paper makes contributions that are sufficient to fully fund its actuarially determined costs, generally equal to the minimum amounts required by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA). While International Paper may elect to make voluntary contributions to its U.S. qualified plan up to the maximum deductible amount per IRS tax regulations in the coming years, it is unlikely that any contributions to the plan will be required before 2007 unless investment performance is negative or International Paper changes its funding policy. In connection with the use of projected proceeds from the Company’s Transformation Plan, International Paper is planning to make voluntary contributions to the U.S. qualified pension fund in the range of $500 million to $1.0 billion to begin satisfying longer-term funding requirements and to lower future pension expense. The U.S. Congress recently passed legislation that changes the minimum funding requirements for qualified defined benefit plans in future years. While the amount of any required contributions after 2006 will depend upon the final rules adopted and other factors, including any voluntary contributions, changes in discount rates and actual plan asset returns, the Company currently estimates that a contribution in 2007 of $40 million to $200 million may be required. The U.S. nonqualified plans are only funded to the extent of benefits paid which are expected to be ~~$34~~$31 million in 2006.

Accounting for Share-Based Compensation Plans. The Company discontinued its stock option program in 2004 for members of executive management, and in 2005 for all other eligible U.S. and non-U.S. employees. In the United States, the stock option program was replaced with a performance-based restricted share program for approximately 1,250 employees to more closely tie long-term compensation to Company performance on two key performance drivers: return on investment (ROI) and total shareholder return (TSR). As part of this shift in focus away from stock options to ~~performance-based~~performance-base restricted stock, the Company accelerated the vesting of all 14 million unvested stock options to July 12, 2005. The Company also considered the benefit to employees and the income statement impact in making its decision to accelerate vesting of these options. Based on the market value of the Company’s common stock on July 12, 2005, the exercise prices of all such stock options were above the market value and, accordingly, the Company recorded no expense as a result of this action.

The Company adopted SFAS No. 123(R), “Share-Based Payment,” effective January 1, 2006 using the modified prospective transition method. This standard requires that compensation cost related to share-based payments be recognized in the financial statements. The amount of compensation cost is measured based on the grant date fair value of the ~~award.~~award less estimated forfeitures. The resulting cost is recognized over the period during which an employee is required to provide service in exchange for the award, usually the vesting period. Prior to January 1, 2006, the Company accounted for share-based compensation in accordance with APB Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees.”

Certain statements in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, and in particular, statements found in Item 2, Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, which are not historical in nature may constitute forward-looking statements. These statements are often identified by the words, “will,” “may,” “should,” “continue,” “anticipate,” “believe,” “expect,” “plan,” “appear,” “project,” “estimate,” “intend,” and words of similar import. Such statements reflect the current views of International Paper with respect to future events and are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed or implied in these statements. Item 1A. Risk Factors contained in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005 contains a specific list of risks and uncertainties that you should carefully read and consider. That list has been updated in Item 1A. Risk Factors contained in this Form 10-Q. We undertake no obligation to publicly update any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

Information relating to quantitative and qualitative disclosures about market risk is shown on pages 34 and 35 of International Paper’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005, which information is incorporated herein by reference.

Disclosure controls and procedures are controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our reports filed or submitted under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (Exchange Act), is recorded, processed, summarized and reported (and accumulated and communicated to management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure) within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms. As of the end of the period covered by this report, we conducted an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Exchange Act. Based upon that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective.

During the period covered by this report, there were no changes in our internal controls over financial reporting that materially affected or are reasonably likely to materially affect our internal control over financial reporting.

The Company does have ongoing initiatives to standardize and upgrade its financial, operating and supply chain systems. The system upgrades will be implemented in stages, by business, over the next several years. Management believes the necessary procedures are in place to maintain effective internal control over financial reporting as these initiatives continue.

A discussion of material developments in the Company’s litigation and settlement matters occurring in the period covered by this report is found in Note 7 to the Financial Statements in this Form 10-Q which information is incorporated in this Item 1 by reference.

The Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005 (the 2005 10-K) contains important risk factors that could cause the Company’s actual results to differ materially from those projected in any forward-looking statement. Forward-looking statements are statements that are not historical in nature and are often identified by the words, “will,” “may,” “should,” “continue,” “anticipate,” “believe,” “expect,” “plan,” “appear,” “project,” “estimate,” “intend,” and words of a similar nature.

The ~~Company has amended~~information presented below updates the risk factors set forth in the 2005 10-K, adding the following factors under the heading “Risks Relating To The Company’s Transformation Plan”:

The ability to ~~include~~successfully negotiate satisfactory sale terms for assets that are contemplated for sale but are not currently under contract. The Company may be unable to divest or spin-off businesses under evaluation on terms that are satisfactory to the ~~following:~~Company.

~~the execution of~~The ability to successfully execute sale transactions currently under contract. The Company’s ability to successfully execute sales transactions under contract and realize the ~~realization of~~ anticipated sales proceeds thereunder is dependent upon many factors, including the ability to successfully consummate the transactions without a ~~material~~ purchase price adjustment, the successful fulfillment (or waiver) of all conditions set forth in the sale agreements, the successful closing of the transactions within the estimated timeframes and the ability to monetize the non-cash portion of the sale ~~proceeds;~~

~~the~~The ability to invest proceeds with attractive financial returns.The Company will selectively seek attractive investment opportunities for a portion of the ~~Company to accomplish the Transformation Plan, including the ability to realize anticipated profit improvement~~proceeds from the ~~plan, the ability~~divestitures. The Company may be unable to ~~successfully~~identify and negotiate satisfactory sale terms for assets that are being evaluated for sale but are not currently under contract, and the ability to make selective accretive reinvestments that meet the Company’s financial requirements; and

These risk factors do not represent a comprehensive list of factors that could cause our results to differ from those that are currently anticipated and should be read together with the risk factors set forth in the 2005 10-K and in the Company’s other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission.


Period	Total Number of Shares (or Units) Purchased		Average Price Paid per Share (or Unit)		Total Number of Shares (or Units) Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs	Maximum Number (or Approximate Dollar Value) of Shares (or Units) that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs	Total Number of Shares Purchased		Average Price Paid per Share			Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs	Maximum Number (or Approximate Dollar Value) of Shares that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs
May 1, 2006 - May 31, 2006	1,260	(a)	$	37.06	0	0
August 1, 2006 - August 31, 2006							1,777		$	34.31		0	0
September 1, 2006 - September 30, 2006							38,465,784	(a)		36.00	(b)	38,465,260	0

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.


New York		13-0872805
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation of organization)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

6400 Poplar Avenue, Memphis, TN		38197
(Address of principal executive offices)		(Zip Code)


		PAGE NO.

PART I.	FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1.	Financial Statements

	Consolidated Statement of Operations -
	Three Months and ~~Six~~Nine Months Ended ~~June~~September 30, 2006 and 2005	1

	Consolidated Balance Sheet -
	~~June~~ September 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005	2

	Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows -
	~~Six~~ Nine Months Ended ~~June~~September 30, 2006 and 2005	3

	Consolidated Statement of Changes in Common Shareholders’ Equity -
	~~Six~~ Nine Months Ended ~~June~~September 30, 2006 and 2005	4

	Condensed Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements	5

	Financial Information by Industry Segment	2123

Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	2325

Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	39

~~Item 4.~~	~~Controls and Procedures~~	40

~~PART II.~~	~~OTHER INFORMATION~~

~~Item 1.~~	~~Legal Proceedings~~	41

~~Item 1A.~~	~~Risk Factors~~	42

Item 2.4.	~~Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities~~ Controls and ~~Use of Proceeds~~Procedures	43

~~Item 3.~~ PART II.	OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1.	Legal Proceedings	44

Item 1A.	Risk Factors	45

Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	46

Item 3.	Defaults ~~upon~~Upon Senior Securities	*

Item 4.	Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders	44

~~Item 5.~~	~~Other Information~~	*

Item 6.5.	~~Exhibits~~ Other Information	45*

Item 6.	Exhibits	47

Signatures		4648


	Three Months Ended ~~June~~September 30, 2006	~~Six~~Nine Months Ended ~~June~~September 30, 2006
Expected volatility	~~20.50%~~20.6%	20.50% ~~-25.20%~~- 25.20%
Risk-free interest rate	~~5.26% -5.30%~~4.59% - 4.89%	4.30% ~~-5.30%~~- 5.30%


	For	Withheld
John L. Townsend III	424,491,379	23,281,549
John F. Turner	424,540,338	23,232,590
Alberto F. Weisser	424,180,858	23,592,070
John V. Faraci	419,060,179	28,712,749
Donald F. McHenry	419,144,494	28,626,434
William G. Walter	424,082,291	23,690,637


For	Against	Abstain	Broker Non-Vote
442,731,999	2,358,909	2,682,018	(0	)


	Common Stock Issued			Paid-in		Retained			Accumulated Other Comprehensive			Treasury Stock					Total Common Shareholders’
	Shares	Amount		Capital		Earnings			Income (Loss)			Shares		Amount			Equity
Balance, December 31, 2005	490,501	$	491	$	6,627	$	3,172		$	(1,935	)	112		$	4		$	8,351
Issuance of stock for various plans, net	2,643		2		15		—			—		(112	)		(4	)		21
Cash dividends - Common stock ($0.50 per share)	—		—		—		(247	)		—		—			—			(247	)
Comprehensive income (loss):
Net loss	—		—		—		(1,122	)		—		—			—			(1,122	)
Change in cumulative foreign currency translation adjustment (less tax of $8)	—		—		—		—			114		—			—			114
Net gains (losses) on cash flow hedging derivatives:
Net loss arising during the period (less tax of $4)	—		—		—		—			(11	)	—			—			(11	)
Less: Reclassification adjustment for gains included in net income (less tax of $1)	—		—		—		—			(5	)	—			—			(5	)

Total comprehensive loss																		(1,024	)

Balance, June 30, 2006	493,144	$	493	$	6,642	$	1,803		$	(1,837	)	—		$	—		$	7,101


Six Months Ended June 30, 2005

	Common Stock Issued			Paid-in		Retained			Accumulated Other Comprehensive			Treasury Stock					Total Common Shareholders’
	Shares	Amount		Capital		Earnings			Income (Loss)			Shares		Amount			Equity
Balance, December 31, 2004	487,495	$	487	$	6,562	$	2,562		$	(1,357	)	16		$	—		$	8,254
Issuance of stock for various plans, net	3,004		3		31		—			—		126			5			29
Cash dividends - Common stock ($0.50 per share)	—		—		—		(246	)		—		—			—			(246	)
Comprehensive income (loss):
Net earnings	—		—		—		154			—		—			—			154
Change in cumulative foreign currency translation adjustment (less tax of $17)	—		—		—		—			(101	)	—			—			(101	)
Net gains (losses) on cash flow hedging derivatives:
Net gain arising during the period (less tax of $10)	—		—		—		—			26		—			—			26
Less: Reclassification adjustment for gains included in net income (less tax of $9)	—		—		—		—			(20	)	—			—			(20	)

Total comprehensive income																		59

Balance, June 30, 2005	490,499	$	490	$	6,593	$	2,470		$	(1,452	)	142		$	5		$	8,096


	Common Stock Issued			Paid-in Capital		Retained Earnings			Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)			Treasury Stock					Total Common Shareholders’ Equity
	Shares	Amount		Paid-in Capital		Retained Earnings			Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)			Shares		Amount			Total Common Shareholders’ Equity
Balance, December 31, 2005	490,501	$	491	$	6,627	$	3,172		$	(1,935	)	112		$	4		$	8,351
Issuance of stock for various plans, net	2,802		3		83		—			—		(115	)		(4	)		90
Repurchase of stock	—		—		—		—			—		38,465			1,392			(1,392	)
Cash dividends - Common stock ($0.75 per share)	—		—		—		(372	)		—		—			—			(372	)
Comprehensive income (loss):
Net loss	—		—		—		(921	)		—		—			—			(921	)
Change in cumulative foreign currency translation adjustment (less tax of $8)	—		—		—		—			135		—			—			135
Net gains (losses) on cash flow hedging derivatives:
Net loss arising during the period (less tax of $6)	—		—		—		—			(9	)	—			—			(9	)
Less: Reclassification adjustment for gains included in net income (less tax of $0)	—		—		—		—			(8	)	—			—			(8	)

Total comprehensive income																		(803	)

Balance, September 30, 2006	493,303	$	494	$	6,710	$	1,879		$	(1,817	)	38,462		$	1,392		$	5,874


	3.1		By-laws of International Paper Company, as amended through October 10, 2006 (filed as an exhibit to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated October 16, 2006 and incorporated herein by reference)

	10.1		Exchange Agreement dated September 19, 2006 by and between Votorantim Celulose E Papel S.A. and International Paper Investments (Holland) B.V. (filed as an exhibit to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated September 25, 2006 and incorporated herein by reference)

	10.2		Second Amendment, dated as of October 25, 2006, to the Amended and Restated Credit and Security Agreement, by and among Red Bird Receivables, Inc., as Borrower, International Paper Financial Services, Inc., as Servicer, International Paper Company, as Performance Guarantor, The Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ, Ltd., New York Branch (formerly known as The Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi, Ltd., New York Branch), as a Co-Agent, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as a Co-Agent, BNP Paribas, New York Branch, as a Co-Agent, Starbird Funding Corporation, Citicorp North America, Inc., as a Co-Agent and Wachovia Bank, National Association, as a Co-Agent and as Administrative Agent.

	10.3		First Amendment, dated October 30, 2006, to Purchase Agreement, dated as of April 4, 2006, among TimberStar Southwest Parent LLC, TimberStar Southwest LLC, International Paper Company and the other selling parties listed on Schedule A thereto.

	10.4		Amendment, dated November 3, 2006, to Amended and Restated Purchase Agreement, dated as of May 26, 2006, among Red Mountain Timberlands LLC, Forest Investment Associates L.P., Red Mountain Investments LLC, FIA Investments LLC, RMS Timberlands LLC, RMS Texas Timberlands I LP, Red Mountain Operations LLC, International Paper Company and the other selling parties listed on Schedule A thereto.

~~10.2~~		~~Amendment No. 1 to Agreement of Purchase and Sale by and among International Paper Company, CMP Investments L.P. and CMP Holdings LLC, dated and effective as of August 1, 2006.~~

11	Statement of Computation of Per Share Earnings

	12		Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges and Preferred Stock Dividends

	31.1		Certification of principal executive officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

	31.2		Certification of principal financial officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

	32		Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


INTERNATIONAL PAPER COMPANY
(Registrant)

	~~INTERNATIONAL PAPER COMPANY~~ ~~(Registrant)~~

Date: ~~August 7,~~November 8, 2006	By	/s/ MARIANNE M. PARRS
		Marianne M. Parrs
		Executive Vice President and Chief
		Financial Officer

Date: ~~August 7,~~November 8, 2006	By	/s/ ROBERT J. GRILLET
		Robert J. Grillet
		Vice President – Finance and Controller