UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, DC 20549

FORM 10-Q

For the quarterly period ended March 30,June 29, 2007

OR

For the transition period from            to

Commission File Number 0-24343

Answerthink, Inc.

(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)

(305) 375-8005

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirement for the past 90 days.    YES  x    NO  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large Accelerated Filer  ¨    Accelerated Filer  x    Non-Accelerated Filer  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    YES  ¨    NO  x

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date:

As of May 2,July 30, 2007, there were 44,990,84845,326,290 shares of common stock outstanding.

Answerthink, Inc.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PART I-FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Answerthink, Inc.

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(in thousands, except share data)

(unaudited)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.

Answerthink, Inc.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(in thousands, except per share data)

(unaudited)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.

Answerthink, Inc.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(in thousands)

(unaudited)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.

Answerthink, Inc.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(unaudited)

1. Basis of Presentation

The consolidated financial statements of Answerthink,Inc. (“Answerthink” or the “Company”) include the accounts of the Company and all of its wholly owned subsidiaries. All material intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated in consolidation.

The accompanying consolidated financial statements include our accounts and those of our wholly owned subsidiaries which we are required to consolidate. We consolidate the assets, liabilities, and results of operations of entities in accordance with Accounting Research Bulletin (“ARB”) No. 51,Consolidated Financial Statements, Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 94,Consolidation of All Majority-Owned Subsidiaries – an amendment of ARB No. 51, with related amendments of Accounting Principles Board (“APB”) Opinion No. 18 and ARB No. 43, Chapter 12, and the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Interpretation (“FIN”) No. 46,Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities, as revised.

In the opinion of management, the accompanying consolidated financial statements reflect all normal and recurring adjustments which are necessary for a fair presentation of the Company’s financial position, results of operations, and cash flows as of the dates and for the periods presented. The consolidated financial statements have been prepared pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission regarding interim financial reporting. Accordingly, these statements do not include all the disclosures normally required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for annual financial statements and should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto for the year ended December 29, 2006 included in the Form 10-K filed by the Company with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The consolidated results of operations for the quarter and six months ended March 30,June 29, 2007 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for any future period or for the full fiscal year.

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the condensed consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

2. Net LossIncome (Loss) Per Common Share

Basic net lossincome (loss) per common share is computed by dividing net lossincome (loss) by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. With regard to common stock subject to vesting requirements or restricted stock units issued to employees, the calculation includes only the vested portion of such stock. Accordingly, common shares outstanding for the basic net lossincome (loss) per share computation are lower than actual shares outstanding.

Net lossincome (loss) per common share assuming dilution is computed by dividing net lossincome (loss) by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding, increased by the assumed conversion of other potentially dilutive securities during the period.

Potentially dilutive shares were excluded from the diluted loss per share calculation for the quarterssix months ended March 30,June 29, 2007 and March 31,June 30, 2006 because their effects would have been anti-dilutive to the net loss incurred by the Company. Therefore, the amounts reported for basic and diluted net loss per share were the same for those periods. Potentially dilutive securities which were not included in the diluted loss per share calculation for the quarters ended March 30, 2007 and March 31, 2006 include 865,289 and 1,705,212 shares, respectively, of unvested restricted stock units issued to employees and 75,504 and 327,407 shares, respectively, of common stock issuable upon the exercise of stock options following the treasury stock method.

3. Comprehensive Loss

The Company accounts for comprehensive income under SFAS No. 130,Reporting Comprehensive Income. Comprehensive loss is summarized below (in thousands):

Answerthink, Inc.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

(unaudited)

2. Net Income (Loss) Per Common Share (continued)

The following table reconciles basic and diluted weighted average shares:

Approximately 1.6 million and 1.5 million stock options were excluded from the computations of diluted net income per common share for the quarters ended June 29, 2007 and June 30, 2006, respectively, as their stock price was higher than the Company’s average stock price.

3. Comprehensive Gain (Loss)

The Company accounts for comprehensive gain (loss) under SFAS No. 130,Reporting Comprehensive Income. Comprehensive gain (loss) is summarized below (in thousands):

4. Loss from Misappropriation, net of Collections

As described in the Form 8-K filed on November 1, 2006, on or about October 26, 2006, the Company learned of a misappropriation by its former UK disbursement agent in 2006, which relatesrelated to funds earmarked for payroll taxes due to the United Kingdom Inland Revenue. The Company and its former disbursement agent have agreed to settlement terms that, if satisfied, would include the full repayment of the misappropriation. In connection with the settlement, the agent made an initial cash payment to the Company in January 2007 of $350 thousand and has agreed to make additional payments to the Company on or before August 31, 2007 that, when taken together with the initial payment, approximate $2.5$2.6 million (at current foreign currency exchange rates). If the payments are not received by this date, the Company can foreclose certain assets pledged by the agent. The agent has guaranteed to pay any amount by which the initial payment, additional cash payments and the net proceeds from the sale of the pledged assets fall below approximately $2.5$2.6 million (at current foreign currency exchange rates). This shortfall amount would be repaid in annual installments of not less than approximately $0.1 million per year (at current foreign currency exchange rates) beginning in 2007, together with interest thereon accruing from January 1, 2008.

Answerthink, Inc.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

(unaudited)

4. Loss from Misappropriation, net of Collections (continued)

The Company cannot predict whether the former disbursement agent will satisfy the terms of the settlement agreement. Due to this uncertainty, any amounts recovered as a result of the Company’s claim will be accounted for as income in the period collected.

5. Restructuring

The Company recorded restructuring costs of $10.9 million and $5.6 million in fiscal years 2002 and 2001, respectively, for reductions in consultants and functional support personnel and for the closure and consolidation of facilities and related exit costs. These actions were taken as a result of the continued decline in demand for technology services throughout 2001 and 2002. The Company took steps to reduce its costs to better align its overall cost structure and organization with anticipated demand for its services.

In 2004 and 2003, the Company recorded restructuring costs of $3.7 million and $4.9 million, respectively, to increase existing reserves to account for potentially higher estimated losses on the sublease of facilities as a result of lower than expected sublease rates and longer than expected time estimates to sublease excess facilities. The 2004 and 2003 restructuring costs consisted of additions of $1.8 million and $3.1 million to the 2002 restructuring accrual and $1.9 million and $1.8 million to the 2001 restructuring accrual, respectively. Also in 2004, the 2002 restructuring accrual was reduced by $370 thousand relating to the final settlement of a lease obligation which was recorded as income from discontinued operations in the consolidated statement of operations for year ended December 31, 2004.

In 2005, the Company recorded restructuring costs of $2.9 million which related to $1.1 million for the consolidation of additional facilities and related exit costs not included in previously established reserves, primarily as a result of the REL Consultancy Group (“REL”) acquisition on November 29, 2005, and $1.8 million for increases in previously established reserves in 2002 and 2001 for the closure and consolidation of facilities, of which $1.1 million is specifically related to the increase of previously established reserves in order to reflect the negotiated buyout of our New York City lease obligation. As a result of the buyout, the Company was fully released from $20.0 million of future lease obligations, assigned two subleases to the lessor, wrote-off a $1.4 million receivable from the lessor, and paid $3.1 million in cash to the lessor. The remaining $700 thousand related to increases in the reserves to account for higher estimated losses on the sublease of facilities as a result of lower than expected sublease rates and longer than expected time estimates to sublease facilities based on current market conditions. The 2005 restructuring costs of $1.8 million related to previously established reserves, which consisted of additions of $1.2 million and $600 thousand to the 2002 and 2001 restructuring accruals, respectively.

In 2006, the Company recorded restructuring costs of $6.3 million, which was comprised of $2.8 million relating to the 2005 restructuring for the consolidation of additional facilities and related exit costs primarily as a result of the REL Consultancy Group (“REL”) acquisition and $3.5 million for increases in previously established reserves in 2002 and 2001 for the closure and consolidation of facilities to account for higher estimated losses on the sublease of facilities as a result of lower than expected sublease rates and longer than expected time estimates to sublease facilities based on current market conditions. Included in the $2.8 million is a further reduction of occupied space in our technology-focused facility in Philadelphia and related severance costs for a senior executive as the Company’s primary business model shifts to a proprietary best practice and intellectual capital and strategic advisory services firm.

Answerthink, Inc.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

(unaudited)

5. Restructuring (continued)

The following tables set forth the detail and activity in the restructuring expense accruals during the quartersix months ended March 30,June 29, 2007 (in thousands):

2001 Restructuring Accrual

2002 Restructuring Accrual

2005 Restructuring Accrual

6. Accounts Receivable and Unbilled Revenue, Net

Accounts receivable and unbilled revenues, net consisted of the following (in thousands):

7. Loan Payable

At March 30,June 29, 2007 and December 29, 2006, the Company did not have any outstanding loans. At December 30, 2005, the Company had a loan with a financial institution of $3.7 million which was repaid in March 2006.

Answerthink, Inc.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

(unaudited)

8. Income Taxes

Effective December 30, 2006, the Company adopted FIN No. 48,Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes. FIN No. 48 prescribes a more-likely-than-not threshold for financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. This interpretation also provides guidance on derecognition of income tax assets and liabilities, classification of current and deferred income tax assets and liabilities, accounting for interest and penalties associated with tax positions, accounting for income taxes in interim periods and income tax disclosures.

As a result of the implementation of FIN No. 48, the Company performed a comprehensive review of its portfolio of uncertain tax positions in accordance with recognition standards established by FIN No. 48. In this regard, an uncertain tax position represents the Company’s expected treatment of a tax position taken in a filed tax return, or planned to be taken in a future tax return, that has not been reflected in measuring income tax expense for financial reporting purposes. As a result of this review, on December 30, 2006, the Company adjusted the estimated value of its uncertain tax positions by recognizing additional liabilities totaling $481 thousand through a charge to retained earnings, which primarily related to potential state and federal tax exposure. The $481 thousand liability included $311 thousand, which was not expected to be paid within one year, and as such was classified as a non-current liability and was included in the non-current portion of accrued expenses and other liabilities in the consolidated balance sheet as of March 30,June 29, 2007. The amount of unrecognized tax positions did not materially change as of March 30,June 29, 2007 and we dothe Company does not believe there will be any material changes in ourits unrecognized tax positions over the next 12 months.

Penalties and tax-related interest expense are reported as a component of income tax expense. As of December 30, 2006, the total amount of accrued income tax-related interest and penalties was $26 thousand and $237 thousand, respectively. The liability for the payment of interest and penalties did not materially change as of March 30,June 29, 2007.

The Company files federal income tax returns, as well as multiple state, local and foreign jurisdiction tax returns. A number of years may elapse before an uncertain tax position is audited and finally resolved. While it is often difficult to predict the final outcome or the timing of resolution ofon any particular uncertain tax position, we believethe Company believes that ourits reserves for income taxes reflect the most probable outcome. We adjustThe Company adjusts these reserves, as well as the related interest, in light of changing facts and circumstances. The resolution of a matter would be recognized as an adjustment to ourthe provision for income taxes and ourthe effective tax rate in the period of resolution. The Company is no longer subject to examinations of its federal income tax returns by the Internal Revenue Service for years through 2002. All significant state, and local, and foreign matters have been concluded for years through 2002.

9. Stock Based Compensation

During the quarter and six months ended March 30,June 29, 2007, the Company issued 237,500290,500 and 528,000 restricted stock units, respectively, at a weighted average grant-date fair value of $3.22. As of March 30, 2007, the Company had 2,006,148 restricted stock units outstanding.

$3.60 and $3.43, respectively. Additionally, during the quarter and six months ended March 30,June 29, 2007, 187,971123,333 and 362,324 shares of common stock issued in connection with an acquisition to REL employees which were subject to vesting requirementsand restricted stock units were forfeited at a weighted average grant-date fair value of $3.99.$4.80 and $4.28, respectively. As of March 30,June 29, 2007, the Company had 488,724 of these shares2,069,830 restricted stock units outstanding.

10. Shareholders’ Equity

Treasury Stock

On July 30, 2002, the Company announced that its Board of Directors approved the repurchase of up to $5.0 million of the Company’s common stock. In 2003, 2004 and 2005, the Board of Directors approved the repurchase of an additional $25.0 million of the Company’s common stock, thereby increasing the total program size to $30.0 million. Under the repurchase plans, the Company

Answerthink, Inc.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

(unaudited)

10. Shareholders’ Equity (continued)

may buy back shares of its outstanding stock from time to time on the open market or through privately negotiated transactions subject to market conditions and trading restrictions. During the quarter ended June 29, 2007, the Company repurchased 509 thousand shares of its common stock at a cost of approximately $1.75 million. As of June 29, 2007, the Company had repurchased 7.7 million shares of its common stock at an average price of $3.34 per share.

11. Litigation

The Company is involved in legal proceedings, claims, and litigation arising in the ordinary course of business not specifically discussed herein. In the opinion of management, the final disposition of such matters will not have a material adverse effect on the financial position, cash flows or results of operations of the Company.

Answerthink, Inc.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

(unaudited)

11.12. Geographic and Service Group Information

Revenues were attributed to geographic areas as follows (in thousands):

Long-lived assets were attributed to geographic areas as follows (in thousands):

As of March 30,June 29, 2007 and December 29, 2006, foreign assets included $19.1 million and $18.3 million, respectively, of goodwill and intangible assets related to REL, a UK based company.REL.

The Company’s revenue was derived from the following service groups (in thousands):

12.13. Reclassifications

Certain prior yearperiod amounts in the consolidated financial statements have been reclassified to conform to current year presentation.

Item 2.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

CAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This report and the information incorporated by reference in it include “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. We intend the forward-looking statements to be covered by the safe harbor provisions for forward-looking statements in these sections. All statements regarding our expected financial position and operating results, our business strategy, our financing plans and forecasted demographic and economic trends relating to our business and industry are forward-looking statements. These statements can sometimes be identified by our use of forward-looking words such as “may,” “will,” “anticipate,” “estimate,” “expect,” or “intend” and similar expressions. These statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause our actual results, performance or achievements to be materially different from the results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements. We cannot promise you that our expectations in such forward-looking statements will turn out to be correct. Factors that impact such forward-looking statements include, among others, our ability to effectively integrate acquisitions into our operations, our ability to attract additional and retain existing business, the timing of projects and the potential for contract cancellation by our customers, changes in expectations regarding our industry, our ability to attract and retain skilled employees, possible changes in collections of accounts receivable, risks of competition, price and margin trends, foreign currency fluctuations and changes in general economic conditions and interest rates. An additional description of our risk factors is set forth in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 29, 2006. We undertake no obligation to update or revise publicly any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

OVERVIEW

Answerthink, Inc. is a leading business and technology consulting firm that enables companies to achieve world-class business performance. By leveraging the comprehensive database of The Hackett Group, the world’s leading repository of enterprise business process performance metrics and best practice intellectual capital, our business and technology solutions help clients improve performance and maximize returns on technology investments.

The Hackett Group, a strategic advisory firm and an Answerthink company, is a world leader in best practice research, benchmarking, business transformation and working capital management services that empirically define and enable world-class enterprise performance. Only The Hackett Group empirically defines world-class performance in sales, generalSales, General and administrative (SG&A)Administrative and supply chain activities with analysis gained through 3,5004,000 benchmark studies over 1415 years at 2,000and work with 2,700 of the world’s leading companies.

Answerthink’s combined capabilities include business advisory programs, benchmarking, business transformation, working capital management, business applications and business intelligence, with corresponding offshore support. Answerthink was formed on April 23, 1997.

Results of Operations

The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, our results of operations and the percentage relationship to revenues of such results.

Quarter and Six Months Ended June 29, 2007 versus Quarter and Six Months Ended June 30, 2006

Revenues.Revenues for the quarter ended March 30,June 29, 2007 decreased by $10.0 million or 20%7% to $39.9$45.5 million from $49.8$49.0 million in the quarter ended March 31,June 30, 2006. Revenues in the six months ended June 29, 2007 decreased 14% to $85.4 million from $98.8 million in the six months ended June 30, 2006. The quarter and six month decrease in revenues for the quarter ended March 30, 2007 was attributable to (1) a decline in revenue in theour Best PracticesPractice Solutions group of $7.7$5.1 million and $12.8 million, respectively, primarily due to the exit of our Lawson and low margin SAP and staff augmentation contracts at the end of 2006 and (2)decreased revenue from our Business Intelligence practice. The quarter decrease was partially offset by a decline of revenue of $2.36% or a $1.6 million increase in revenues generated from The Hackett Group due to a decline of $3.7 million or 16%4% increase in our Benchmarking and Business Transformation business, which primarily related to REL, offset by angroup and a 21% increase of $1.4 million or 62% in our Membership Advisory Programs. Programs group.

Reimbursements as a percentage of revenues during the quarters and six months ended March 30,June 29, 2007 and March 31,June 30, 2006 were comparable at approximately 9%11% to 10% and 10%, respectively.

During the quarterquarters and six months ended MarchJune 29, 2007 and June 30, 2007,2006, no customer accounted for revenues equal to or greater than 5% of total revenues. During the quarter ended March 31, 2006, two customers accounted for revenues greater than 5% of total revenues, which together accounted for 11% of total revenues.

Cost of Service.Cost of service primarily consists of salaries, benefits and incentive compensation for consultants and reimbursable expenses associated with projects. Cost of service was $25.2decreased 6% to $28.3 million in the quarter ended March 30,June 29, 2007 a decrease of $6.2from $30.0 million or 20% compared toin the quarter ended March 31,June 30, 2006. ThisCost of service decreased 13% to $53.5 million in the six months ended June 29, 2007 from $61.4 million in the six months ended June 30, 2006. The quarter and six month decrease was primarily attributable to thea 23% and 26% decrease in totalthe Best Practice Solutions group average billable headcount, respectively, as a result of 107 compared toour exit from our Lawson and low margin SAP staff augmentation contracts. The Best Practice Solutions group average billable headcount was 293 and 290 in the quarter and six months ended March 31, 2006. Consultant headcount was 563 as of MarchJune 29, 2007, respectively, from 380 and 392 in the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2007 compared to 670 as of March 31, 2006, a 16% decrease. respectively.

Cost of service as a percentage of revenues during the quarters and six months ended March 30,June 29, 2007 and March 31,June 30, 2006 was comparable at 62% to 61% and 63%. to 62%, respectively.

Selling, General and Administrative.Selling, general and administrative expensescosts decreased 2%by 5% to $17.5$15.8 million in the quarter ended March 30,June 29, 2007 from $17.8$16.6 million in the quarter ended March 31,June 30, 2006. Selling, general and administrative costs decreased 3% to $33.3 million in the six months ended June 29, 2007 from $34.4 million in the six months ended June 30, 2006. The overall decrease in selling, general and administrative expensescosts for the quarter and six months was primarily attributable to (1) a $740$585 thousand and $1.3 million reduction in depreciation and amortization expense, respectively, due to fully amortized assets for the quarter and (2) a $142 thousand reduction in bad debt expense. These decreases weresix month periods. The six month decrease was partially offset by increases related to (1)severance costs of approximately $343 thousand (at current foreign currency exchange rates) and professional fees of $239 thousand incurred in conjunction with the misappropriation of funds of $183 thousand (see discussion below), and (2) severance costs of approximately $337 thousand.funds.

Restructuring Costs.We recorded restructuring costs for the six months ended June 30, 2006 of $6.3 million in the quarter ended March 31, 2006 which was comprised of $2.8 million relating to the 2005 restructuring for the consolidation of additional facilities and related exit costs primarily as a

result of the REL Consultancy Group (“REL”) acquisition and $3.5 million for increases in previously established reserves in 2002 and 2001 for the closure and consolidation of facilities to account for higher estimated losses on the sublease of facilities as a result of lower than expected sublease rates and longer than expected time estimates to sublease facilities based on current market conditions. Included in the $2.8 million is a further reduction of occupied space in our technology-focused facility in Philadelphia and related severance costs for a senior executive as the Company’s primary business model shifts to a proprietary best practice intellectual capital and strategic advisory services firm. We did not record any restructuring costs duringfor the quarter and six months ended March 30,June 29, 2007.

Loss Fromfrom Misappropriation, Netnet of Collections.The loss from misappropriation, net of collections of $350 thousand for the quartersix months ended March 30,June 29, 2007, related to collections received on funds that were misappropriated by our former UK disbursement agent. We learned of a misappropriation by our former UK disbursement agent in 2006, which related to funds earmarked for payroll taxes due to the United Kingdom Inland Revenue. The disbursement agent had been utilized from early 2003 to January 2006 to make payroll, payroll tax and vendor disbursements in our United KingdomUK operations.

Income Taxes.We recorded income taxes of $67$68 thousand and $135 thousand for the quarter and six months ended March 30, 2007.June 29, 2007, respectively. This amount reflected an estimated annual 3%4.5% and 18.0% tax rate for the quarter and six months ended June 29, 2007, respectively, for certain U.S. federal and state taxes. For the quarter and six months ended March 31,June 30, 2006, we recorded income taxes of $365$332 thousand and $697 thousand, respectively, which reflected an estimated annual 7% tax rate for 2006 of 13.5% and 20.4% for certain U.S. federal and state taxes. The 2006 federalincome taxes were related to federal and state taxes for REL’s U.S. entity, as we were unable to utilizewhich could not be offset against our federal net operating loss carryforward to offset REL U.S. income.carryforward.

Effective December 30, 2006, we adopted FIN No. 48,Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes. As a result of the implementation of FIN No. 48, we performed a comprehensive review of our portfolio of uncertain tax positions in accordance with recognition standards established by FIN No. 48. In this regard, an uncertain tax position represents our expected treatment of a tax position taken in a filed tax return, or planned to be taken in a future tax return, that has not been reflected in measuring income tax expense for financial reporting purposes. As a result of this review, on December 30, 2006, we adjusted the estimated value of our uncertain tax positions by recognizing additional liabilities totaling $481 thousand through a charge to retained earnings, which primarily related to potential state and federal tax exposure. The $481 thousand liability included $311 thousand, which was not expected to be paid within one year, and as such was classified as a non-current liability and included in the non-current portion of accrued expenses and other liabilities in the consolidated balance sheet as of March 30,June 29, 2007. The amount of unrecognized tax positions did not materially change as of March 30,June 29, 2007 and we do not believe there will be any material changes in our unrecognized tax positions over the next 12 months.

Penalties and tax-related interest expense are reported as a component of income tax expense. As of December 30, 2006, the total amount of accrued income tax-related interest and penalties was $26 thousand and $237 thousand, respectively. The liability for the payment of interest and penalties did not materially change as of March 30,June 29, 2007.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

We have funded our operations primarily with cash flows generated from operations and the proceeds from our initial public offering. At March 30,June 29, 2007, we had $23.6$20.9 million in cash and cash equivalents, compared to $19.6 million at December 29, 2006. At March 30,June 29, 2007 and December 29, 2006, we had $600 thousand on deposit with a financial institution as collateral for letters of credit and have classified these deposits as restricted cash in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.

Net cash provided by operating activities was $4.2$3.9 million for the quartersix months ended March 30,June 29, 2007, compared to net cash used in operating activities of $2.8$1.3 million for the comparable period in 2006. During the quartersix months ended March 30,June 29, 2007, net cash provided by operating activities was primarily attributable to the net collections of accounts receivable and unbilled revenue of $6.3$0.7 million,

which resulted in a decrease in Days Sales Outstanding of 14 days. This15 days and an increase was primarily offset by (1) higher prepaid expenses and other current assets of $546 thousand, mostly related to prepaid insurance, (2) a decrease of $857 thousand in accounts payable due to the timing of trade payables, and (3) a decrease of $542 thousand in accrued expenses and other liabilities, primarily due to a decrease of accrued commissions, bonus and professional fees, which were mostly offset by higher salary accruals.liabilities. During the quartersix months ended March 31,June 30, 2006, net cash used in operating activities was primarily attributable to (1) our net lossan increase of $6.2$1.8 million adjusted for $3.7 million of non-cash expenses, (2) increases of $571 thousand in accounts receivable and unbilled revenues (3) $157 thousand in prepaid expenses and other assets and (4) a decrease of $1.5 million in trade accounts payable. These effects were partially offset byaccounting for an increase in Days Sales Outstanding of $2.0 million in accrued expenses and other liabilities. Non-cash expenses included depreciation and amortization, provision for doubtful accounts and non-cash compensation expense.7 days.

Net cash used in investing activities was $189 thousand$1.0 million for the quartersix months ended March 30,June 29, 2007, compared to cash provided by investing activities of $7.7$1.4 million for the quartersix months ended March 31,June 30, 2006. Cash used in investing activities in 2007 was primarily attributable to $1.1 million of purchases related to computer software and equipment and the build-out of property and equipment.new office space in the UK. Cash fromused in investing activities in the six months ended June 30, 2006 was primarily attributable to $1.3 million used for the purchase of property and equipment and $8.8 million used for the acquisition of businesses, mostly related to deferred consideration paid in 2006 for our acquisition of REL and EZ Commerce Global Solutions, Inc., partially offset by maturities of marketable investments of $5.0 million and a decrease in restricted cash of $3.7 million, partially offset by $570 thousand used for the purchase of property and equipment and $353 thousand used for the acquisition of a business.

million.

Net cash provided by financing activities was $24 thousand for the quarter ended March 30, 2007 compared to net cash used in financing activities of $4.5was $1.6 million for the quartersix months ended March 31,June 29, 2007, compared to $4.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2006. Cash provided byused in financing activities in 2007 was primarily attributable to the exercisebuyback of $1.8 million of our common stock including $25 thousand which did not settle until July, at an average price of $3.44 per share. Partially offsetting the 2007 share buybacks were proceeds from the sale of stock options.as a result of exercises of stock sold through our Employee Stock Purchase Plan of $170 thousand and exercises of stock options of $26 thousand. During the quartersix months ended March 31,June 30, 2006, cash used in financing activities was primarily related tofor the repayment of the REL Employee Benefit Trust loan of $3.7 million and the repayment of bank overdrafts of $1.1 million, partially offset by $238$752 thousand offrom proceeds from the sale of stock as a result of exercises of stock options.options as well as the sale of stock through our Employee Stock Purchase Plan.

On July 30, 2002, we announced that our Board of Directors approved the repurchase of up to $5.0 million of our common stock. In 2003, 2004 and 2005, our Board of Directors approved the repurchase of an additional $25.0 million of our common stock, thereby increasing the total program size to $30.0 million. Under the repurchase plan, we may buy back shares of our outstanding stock from time to time either on the open market or through privately negotiated transactions, subject to market conditions and trading restrictions. During the quarter ended March 30,June 29, 2007, the Company did not repurchase any shares.we repurchased 509 thousand shares at an average price of $3.44. As of March 30,June 29, 2007, we had repurchased 7.27.7 million shares of our common stock at an average price of $3.33$3.34 per share.

We currently believe that available funds and cash flows generated by operations, if any, will be sufficient to fund our working capital and capital expenditure requirements for at least the next 12 months. We may decide to raise additional funds in order to fund expansion, to develop new or enhancedfurther enhance products and services, to respond to competitive pressures, or to acquire complementary businesses or technologies. There is no assurance, however, that additional financing will be available when needed or desired.

At March 30,June 29, 2007, our exposure to market risk related primarily to changes in interest rates on our investment portfolio. Our marketable investments consist primarily of short-term fixed interest rate securities. We invest only with high credit quality issuers and we do not use derivative financial instruments in our investment portfolio. We do not believe that a significant increase or decrease in interest rates would have a material impact on the fair value of our investment portfolio.

Exchange Rate Sensitivity

We face exposure to adverse movements in foreign currency exchange rates, as a portion of our revenues, expenses, assets and liabilities are denominated in currencies other than the U.S. Dollar, primarily the British pound and the euro. These exposures may change over time as business practices evolve. Currently, we do not hold any derivativesderivative contracts that hedge our foreign currency risk, but we may adopt such strategies in the future.

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

As of the end of the period covered by this report, we carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of management, including our Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) and Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”), of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures (“Disclosure Controls”) pursuant to Rule 13a-14(c) and Rule 15d-14(c) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Based upon that evaluation, the CEO and CFO concluded that our Disclosure Controls are effective in timely alerting them to material information required to be included in our periodic SEC filings.

Limitations on the Effectiveness of Controls

Our management, including our CEO and CFO, does not expect that our Disclosure Controls and internal controls will prevent all error and all fraud. A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. Further, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within the Company have been detected. These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty, and that breakdowns can occur because of simple error or mistake. Additionally, controls can be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people, or by management override of the control.

Changes in Internal Controls

There were no changes in our internal controlcontrols over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal controlcontrols over financial reporting.

PART II-OTHER INFORMATION

We are involved in legal proceedings, claims, and litigation arising in the ordinary course of business not specifically discussed herein. In the opinion of management, the final disposition of such matters will not have a material adverse effect on our financial position cash flows or results of operations.

NoneNone.

See Index to Exhibits on page 17,19, which is incorporated herein by reference.

The Exhibits listed in the accompanying Index to Exhibits are filed as part of this report.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

INDEX TO EXHIBITS

1719