Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No x

The registrant had 7,326,671 shares of common stock outstanding as of ~~June 12,~~September 7, 2007.


	April 30, 2007		January 31, 2007^(A)		July 31, 2007		January 31, 2007^(A)
ASSETS
Current Assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	21,998	$	26,360	$	21,002	$	26,360
Short-term investments		700		897		686		897
Accounts receivable, net of reserves of $143 and $111		4,002		10,942
Inventory, net of reserves of $668 and $600		5,109		5,452
Accounts receivable, net of reserves of $54 and $111						3,129		10,942
Inventory, net of reserves of $720 and $600						4,079		5,452
Other current assets		364		427		495		427

Total current assets		32,173		44,078		29,391		44,078
Property and equipment, net		2,915		3,331		2,683		3,331
Software development costs, net		104		243		39		243
Acquired intangible assets, net		731		820		642		820
Goodwill		2,394		2,394		2,394		2,394
Restricted cash		500		500		500		500
Other assets		47		47		47		47

Total assets	$	38,864	$	51,413	$	35,696	$	51,413


LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Current Liabilities:
Accounts payable	$	518	$	718	$	297	$	718
Deferred revenue		2,165		2,586		2,227		2,586
Deferred compensation		700		897		686		897
Accrued liabilities		3,424		6,259		3,032		6,259

Total current liabilities		6,807		10,460		6,242		10,460
Deferred income taxes		59		59		59		59
Tax liability: FIN 48		86		—		86		—
Deferred rent		720		767		673		767
Deferred revenue		2,169		2,138		1,976		2,138

Total liabilities		9,841		13,424		9,036		13,424

Commitments and Contingencies

Stockholders’ Equity:
Preferred stock, no par value, 10,000,000 shares authorized; no shares issued or outstanding at April 30, 2007 and January 31, 2007, respectively		—		—
Common stock, $0.10 par value, 50,625,000 shares authorized; 7,371,338 and 7,371,637 shares issued and outstanding at April 30, 2007 and January 31, 2007, respectively		737		737
Preferred stock, no par value, 10,000,000 shares authorized; no shares issued or outstanding at July 31, 2007 and January 31, 2007, respectively						—		—
Common stock, $0.10 par value, 50,625,000 shares authorized; 7,326,671 and 7,371,637 shares issued and outstanding at July 31, 2007 and January 31, 2007, respectively						733		737
Additional paid-in capital		6,898		14,163		6,759		14,163
Retained earnings		21,388		23,089		19,168		23,089

Total stockholders’ equity		29,023		37,989		26,660		37,989

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	38,864	$	51,413	$	35,696	$	51,413

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.


	Three Months Ended April 30,						Three Months Ended July 31,					Six Months Ended July 31,
	2007			2006			2007			2006		2007			2006
Revenue	$	5,415		$	10,555		$	5,919		$	12,972	$	11,334		$	23,528
Cost of revenue		3,236			7,024			4,111			8,246		7,347			15,271

Gross profit		2,179			3,531			1,808			4,726		3,987			8,257

Selling, general, and administrative expenses		2,406			2,517			2,356			2,606		4,762			5,124
Engineering and support expenses		1,951			1,879			2,159			2,099		4,109			3,977

Operating loss		(2,178	)		(865	)
Operating income (loss)								(2,707	)		21		(4,884	)		(844	)
Other income, net		274			229			218			221		491			450
Gain on sale of equipment, net		321			—			—			—		321			—
Gain on sale of investment in SwissQual, net		—			61			269			—		269			61

Loss from continuing operations before income taxes		(1,583	)		(575	)
Income (loss) before income taxes								(2,220	)		242		(3,803	)		(333	)
Income tax expense		32			—			—			—		32			—

Net loss	$	(1,615	)	$	(575	)
Net income (loss)							$	(2,220	)	$	242	$	(3,835	)	$	(333	)

Basic and diluted loss per share:
Net loss	$	(0.22	)	$	(0.08	)
Basic and diluted income (loss) per share:
Net income (loss)							$	(0.30	)	$	0.03	$	(0.52	)	$	(0.05	)

Weighted average common shares outstanding:
Basic		7,366			7,429			7,333			7,391		7,349			7,410

Diluted		7,366			7,429			7,333			7,436		7,349			7,410

Common shares outstanding		7,371			7,430			7,327			7,379		7,327			7,379

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.


	Three Months Ended April 30,						Six Months Ended July 31,
	2007			2006			2007			2006
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net loss	$	(1,615	)	$	(575	)	$	(3,835	)	$	(333	)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:
Adjustments to reconcile net loss from continuing operations to net cash used in operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization		652			751			1,193			1,533
Gain on sale/retirement of property and equipment		(310	)		(9	)		(300	)		(21	)
Gain on sale of investment in SwissQual		—			(82	)		(269	)		(82	)
Stock based compensation expense		121			84			265			230
Provision for doubtful accounts receivable		32			—			4			6
Provision for obsolete inventory		58			282			69			473
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable		6,908			53			7,809			(938	)
Inventory		285			(138	)		1,304			1,041
Other assets		63			34			(68	)		(922	)
Accounts payable		(200	)		684			(421	)		94
Deferred revenue		(390	)		225			(521	)		462
Deferred rent		(47	)		—			(94	)		657
Accrued liabilities		(2,835	)		(3,885	)		(3,227	)		(2,556	)

Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities		2,722			(2,576	)

Net cash provided by (used) in operating activities								1,909			(356	)

CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Purchases of property and equipment		(58	)		(357	)		(224	)		(1,796	)
Proceeds from sale of equipment		361			11			361			22
Increase in restricted cash								—			(500	)
Proceeds from sale of investment in SwissQual		—			82			269			82

Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities		303			(264	)

Net cash provided by (used) in investing activities								406			(2,192	)

CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Net proceeds from issuance of common stock		84			—			84			—
Dividends paid		(7,371	)		—			(7,371	)		—
Purchase and retirement of common stock		(100	)		—			(386	)		(480	)

Net cash used in financing activities		(7,387	)		—			(7,673	)		(480	)

Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents		(4,362	)		(2,840	)		(5,358	)		(3,028	)
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period		26,360			26,017			26,360			26,017

Cash and cash equivalents, end of period	$	21,998		$	23,177		$	21,002		$	22,989

Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information:
Cash paid for interest	$	8		$	—		$	8		$	—

Cash paid for income taxes	$	562		$	119		$	714		$	173

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

Comarco, Inc., through its subsidiary Comarco Wireless Technologies, Inc. (collectively, “we,” “Comarco,” or “the Company”), is a leading designer and manufacturer of external mobile power adapters used to power and charge notebook computers, mobile phones, and many other rechargeable handheld devices. Comarco is also a provider of wireless test solutions for the wireless industry, as well as a provider of emergency call box systems and related maintenance services. Our operations consist solely of the operations of Comarco Wireless Technologies, Inc. (“CWT”), which was incorporated in the State of Delaware in September 1993. Comarco, Inc. is a California corporation whose common stock has been publicly traded since 1971 when it was spun-off from Genge Industries, Inc.

The interim condensed consolidated financial statements of Comarco included herein have been prepared without audit in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for interim information and with the instructions for Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by generally accepted accounting principles for complete financial statements. The Company believes that the disclosures are adequate to make the information presented not misleading when read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements included in the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended January 31, 2007. The unaudited, interim condensed financial information presented herein reflects all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring accruals, which are, in the opinion of management, necessary for a fair presentation of the results for the interim periods presented. The results for the three and six months ended ~~April 30,~~July 31, 2007 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the year ending January 31, 2008.

The ~~unaudited~~ condensed consolidated financial statements of the Company include the accounts of Comarco, Inc. and CWT. All material intercompany balances, transactions, and profits and losses have been eliminated.

The preparation of ~~unaudited~~ condensed consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the condensed consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the period reported. Actual results could materially differ from those estimates.

Certain accounting principles require subjective and complex judgments to be used in the preparation of financial statements. Accordingly, a different financial presentation could result depending on the judgments, estimates, or assumptions that are used. Such estimates and assumptions include, but are not specifically limited to, those required in the valuation of long-lived assets, allowance for doubtful accounts, reserves for inventory obsolescence, ~~warranties,~~and valuation allowances for deferred tax ~~assets, and determination of stock based compensation.~~assets.

Certain prior period balances have been reclassified to conform to the current period presentation.

The Company adopted the provisions of Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Interpretation (“FIN”) No. 48 “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes – An Interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109” (“FIN 48”) on February 1, 2007. This interpretation clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in an enterprise’s financial statements in accordance with FASB Statement No. 109 “Accounting for Income Taxes” and prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement criteria for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. The interpretation also provides guidance on de-recognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure, and transition.

As a result of the adoption of FIN 48, the Company recorded an $86,000 decrease in retained earnings and increased non-current liabilities by $86,000. As of February 1, 2007, the total amount of unrecognized tax benefit is $592,000. If reversed, $86,000 of the decrease in the unrecognized benefit amount would result in a reduction in income tax expense.

The Company recognizes interest and penalties associated with unrecognized tax benefits in the ~~Income~~income tax expense line item of the Consolidated Statements of Operations. As of ~~April 30,~~July 31, 2007, the Company had accrued approximately $14,000 in interest and penalties, which has been recorded directly to retained earnings in accordance with the adoption of FIN 48.

The Company and its subsidiaries file income tax returns in the U.S. federal jurisdiction and in certain state jurisdictions. With few exceptions, the Company is no longer subject to U.S. federal or state income tax examinations by tax authorities for years before 2002 in those jurisdictions where returns have been filed. Due to normal closures of the statute of limitations, the Company anticipates that there is a reasonable possibility that the amount of unrecognized federal tax benefits will decrease by $31,000 within the next twelve months.

The Company grants stock options for a fixed number of shares to employees with an exercise price equal to the fair value of the shares at the date of grant.

As of February 1, 2006, the Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (“SFAS”) No. 123R, “Share-Based Payment” (“SFAS 123R”), using the modified prospective method, which requires measurement of compensation cost for all stock awards at fair value on date of grant and recognition of compensation over the service period for awards expected to vest. The fair value of stock options is determined using the Black-Scholes valuation model, which is consistent with the Company’s valuation techniques previously utilized for options in footnote disclosures required under SFAS 123, and requires the input of subjective assumptions. These assumptions include estimating the length of time employees will retain their vested stock options before exercising them (the “expected term”), the estimated volatility of our common stock price over the expected term, and the number of options that will ultimately not complete their vesting requirements (“forfeitures”). Changes in these subjective assumptions can materially affect the estimate of fair value of stock-based compensation and, consequently, the related amount recognized as an expense on the consolidated statements of operations. As required under the accounting rules, the Company reviews its valuation assumptions at each grant date and, as a result, is likely to change its valuation assumptions used to value employee stock-based awards granted in future periods. The values derived from using the Black-Scholes model are recognized as expense over the vesting period, net of estimated forfeitures. The estimation of stock awards that will ultimately vest requires significant judgment. Actual results, and future changes in estimates, may differ from the Company’s current estimates.

The compensation expense recognized in connection with the adoption of SFAS 123R is summarized in the table below (in thousands except per share amounts):

There was no impact on cash flows from operating, investing, or financing activities in connection with the adoption of SFAS 123R. The total compensation cost related to nonvested awards not yet recognized is approximately ~~$917,000,~~$945,000, which will be expensed over a weighted average remaining life of ~~20.6~~21.8 months.

~~For the first quarter of fiscal 2008 and 2007, no stock options were granted. There were 207,000 shares granted during fiscal 2007 with a per share weighted-average~~The fair value of ~~$5.36~~options granted under the Company’s stock option plans during the three and six months ended July 31, 2007 and 2006 was estimated on the date of grant using the ~~Black Scholes~~Black-Scholes option-pricing model ~~with~~utilizing the following ~~weighted-average~~weighted average assumptions:

Comarco, Inc. has stock-based compensation plans under which outside directors and certain employees receive stock options. The employee stock option plans and a director stock option plan provide that officers, key employees, and directors may be granted options to purchase ~~up to 2,704,337~~ shares of common stock of the Company at not less than 100 percent of the fair market value at the date of grant, unless the optionee is a 10 percent shareholder of the Company, in which case the price must not be less than 110 percent of the fair market value. The total number of shares that may be granted under these plans is 2,704,337. Figures for these plans reflect a 3-for-2 stock split declared during the year ended January 31, 2001.

The director stock-based compensation plan (the “Director Plan”) expires in December 2010, and the Company’s former employee stock option plan (the “Employee Plan”) expired during May 2005. During December 2005, the Board of Directors approved and adopted a new equity incentive plan (the “2005 Plan”) covering 450,000 shares of our common stock. The 2005 Plan was approved by the Company’s shareholders at its annual shareholders’ meeting in June 2006. Under all plans, the options are exercisable in installments determined by the compensation committee of the Company’s Board of Directors; however, no employee option may be exercised prior to one year following the grant of the option. The options ~~granted under~~of the Director Plan and the Employee Plan expire as determined by the committee, but no later than ten years and one week after the date of grant (five years for 10 percent shareholders). The options ~~granted under~~of the 2005 Plan expire as determined by the committee, but no later than ten years after the date of ~~grant (five years for 10 percent shareholders).~~grant.

Transactions and other information related to these plans for the ~~three~~six months ended ~~April 30,~~July 31, 2007 are summarized below:


	Outstanding Options				Outstanding Options
	Number of Shares		Weighted-Average Exercise Price		Number of Shares		Weighted-Average Exercise Price
Balance, January 31, 2007	985,770		$	12.18	985,770		$	12.18
Options granted	—			—	92,500			6.27
Options canceled or expired	(65,645	)		10.72	(154,645	)		12.35
Options exercised	(26,125	)		7.74	(26,125	)		7.74

Balance, April 30, 2007	894,000
Balance, July 31, 2007					897,500			11.67

NoThe average fair value of each of the options ~~were~~ granted during the ~~three~~six months ended ~~April 30, 2007.~~July 31, 2007 was $2.87. As of ~~April 30,~~July 31, 2007 the stock options outstanding have no intrinsic value. The following table summarizes information about the Company’s stock options outstanding at ~~April 30,~~July 31, 2007:


	Options Outstanding				Options Exercisable			Options Outstanding				Options Exercisable
Range of Exercise Prices	Number Outstanding	Weighted-Avg. Remaining Contractual Life	Weighted-Avg. Exercise Price		Number Exercisable	Weighted-Avg. Exercise Price		Number Outstanding	Weighted-Avg. Remaining Contractual Life	Weighted-Avg. Exercise Price		Number Exercisable	Weighted-Avg. Exercise Price
$ 7.00 to 9.89	315,375	5.95		$ 7.94	197,844	$	7.91
$ 6.19 to 9.89								402,500	6.68	$	7.57	240,250	$	7.82
10.43 to 12.41	214,500	7.88		10.75	79,500		11.29	197,000	7.58		10.76	107,000		11.04
13.21 to 17.50	221,625	2.06		14.49	221,625		14.49	163,000	1.92		14.59	163,000		14.59
19.33 to 23.67	142,500	3.08		21.63	142,500		21.63	135,000	2.82		21.72	135,000		21.72

6.19 to 23.67								897,500	5.43 years		11.67	645,250		12.97
	894,000	4.99 years			641,469		13.65

Stock options exercisable at ~~April 30,~~July 31, 2007 were ~~641,469~~645,250 at a weighted-average exercise price of ~~$13.65.~~$12.97. At ~~April 30,~~July 31, 2007, shares available for future grants under the 2005 Plan were ~~267,000~~174,500 and under the director stock option plan were 625.

CWT also has a subsidiary stock option plan. Under this plan, officers and key employees of CWT may be granted options to purchase up to 600,000 shares of common stock of CWT at not less than 100 percent of the fair market value at the date of grant.

As of ~~April 30,~~July 31, 2007 the Company owned all of the 3,353,000 outstanding shares of CWT common stock. The fair market value of the shares and the exercise dates of the options are determined by the compensation committee of the Company’s Board of Directors; however, no option may be exercised prior to one year following the grant of the option. The options expire as determined by the compensation committee, but not later than ten years and one week after the date of grant.

During the three and six months ended ~~April 30,~~July 31, 2007, no options were granted or exercised under the CWT option plan. There were no options ~~exercisable~~outstanding at ~~April 30,~~July 31, 2007. Shares available under the plan for future grants at ~~April 30,~~July 31, 2007 were 198,000.

In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, “The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities – Including an Amendment of FASB Statement No. 115” (“SFAS 159”). This standard amends SFAS No. 115, “Accounting for Certain Investment in Debt and Equity Securities,” with respect to accounting for a transfer to the trading category for all entities with available-for-sale and trading securities electing the fair value option. This standard allows companies to elect fair value accounting for many financial instruments and other items that currently are not required to be accounted as such, allows different applications for electing the option for a single item or groups of items, and requires disclosures to facilitate comparisons of similar assets and liabilities that

are accounted for differently in relation to the fair value option. SFAS 159 is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007, which for Comarco is fiscal 2009. The Company does not expect SFAS 159 to have a material impact on its consolidated financial position and results of operations.

In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements” (“SFAS 157”). This new standard establishes a framework for measuring the fair value of assets and liabilities. This framework is intended to provide increased consistency in how fair value determinations are made under various existing accounting standards that permit, or in some cases require, estimates of fair market value. SFAS 157 also expands financial statement disclosure requirements about a company’s use of fair value measurements, including the effect of such measures on earnings. This statement is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, ~~2007.~~2007, which for Comarco is fiscal 2009. The Company does not expect the adoption of SFAS 157 to have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.

During fiscal 2002, the Company purchased an 18 percent equity stake in Switzerland based SwissQual AG (“SwissQual”) for approximately $1.1 million. SwissQual is a developer of quality of service systems and software for measuring, monitoring, and optimizing the quality of mobile, fixed, and IP-based voice and data communications. Under this alliance, SwissQual iswas responsible for reselling and supporting Comarco’s co-branded Seven.Five products in Europe, the Middle East, and North Africa (the Company’s “European” region). The Company has a revenue sharing agreement in place that determines how much revenue Comarco earns from SwissQual sales and, conversely, how much revenue SwissQual earns from the Company’s sales to customers located outside the European region.

Revenue recorded related to SwissQual for the ~~quarters~~three and six months ended ~~April 30,~~July 31, 2007 was de minimus. Revenue recorded related to SwissQual for the three and six months ended July 31, 2006 totaled ~~$26,000~~$506,000 and ~~$659,000,~~$1.2 million, respectively. Accounts receivable balances due from SwissQual at ~~April 30,~~July 31, 2007 and January 31, 2007 were ~~$26,000~~$7,000 and $1.2 million, respectively.

On December 15, 2005, the Company entered into a Distribution and Sales Agreement (“DASA”) with SwissQual whereby SwissQual receives 10 percent of the revenue on all Seven.Five product sales, less associated hardware costs, through December 31, 2006. Effective January 1, 2007 the revenue sharing applicable to both parties ~~increases~~increased to 35 percent on hardware upgrades and 50 percent on software upgrades. At ~~April 30,~~July 31, 2007 and January 31, 2007 the Company had accrued ~~$610,000~~$42,000 and $93,000, respectively, relating to amounts payable to SwissQual under the DASA. During the ~~first~~second quarter of fiscal 2008 and 2007, the Company paid ~~$52,000~~$632,000 and ~~$606,000,~~$527,000, respectively, to SwissQual for revenue sharing amounts accrued under the DASA. For the six months ended July 31, 2007 and 2006, the Company paid $684,000 and $1.1 million, respectively, to SwissQual for revenue sharing amounts.

During January 2006, Spirent plc (“Spirent”) acquired 100 percent of the outstanding shares of SwissQual for consideration totaling up to approximately $71.3 million. Approximately $37.6 million in cash was paid at the close of the transaction, which is net of $2.5 million of transaction costs, with an additional $9.1 million put into escrow to secure certain indemnification obligations. The escrowed consideration is expected to be released within 24 months of the close. In addition, up to $22.1 million in contingent consideration may be paid within 24 months upon satisfaction of certain performance and other requirements. Upon the closing of the transaction, the Company received approximately $6.8 million of the closing consideration, which is net of $0.5 million of transaction costs, for its 18 percent ownership interest in SwissQual and may receive up to an additional $5.4 million of any escrow distribution and contingent consideration. During the year ended January 31, 2006, the Company recorded a gain on sale of investment totaling $6.1 million, which was based on cash consideration received by the Company. During the first quarter of fiscal 2007, the Company recorded a net gain on sale of investment in the amount of $61,000, which represents $82,000 in proceeds received from the escrowed consideration, less $21,000 in foreign jurisdiction withholding taxes, which are non-refundable. During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2007, the Company received an additional $1.6 million of contingent consideration, net of $0.1 million of transaction costs, recorded as gain on sale of investment in SwissQual. Finally, during the second quarter of fiscal 2008, the Company received an additional

$269,000 of contingent consideration, net of $21,000 of transaction costs. Due to uncertainty as to timing and amount of any escrow distribution and contingent consideration, the Company expects to record an additional gain as the contingency lapses and the funds are probable of receipt.

During 1992, the Company’s Board of Directors authorized a stock repurchase program of up to 3.0 million shares of the Company’s common stock. From program inception through ~~April 30,~~July 31, 2007, the Company repurchased approximately ~~2.6~~2.7 million shares for an average price of ~~$8.23~~$8.20 per share. During the ~~quarter~~three and six months ended ~~April 30,~~July 31, 2007, the Company repurchased ~~12,970~~44,667 and 57,637 shares of common stock at an average price of ~~$7.68~~$6.41 and $6.70 per ~~share.~~

A roll-forward of the Company’s stockholders equity for the ~~quarter~~six months ended ~~April 30,~~July 31, 2007 is presented below (in thousands, except share data):


	Three Months Ended April 30, 2007												Six Months Ended July 31, 2007
	Common Stock Par Value			Additional Paid-In Capital			Retained Earnings			Total			Common Stock Par Value			Additional Paid-In Capital			Retained Earnings			Total
Balance at January 31, 2007, 7,371,637 shares		$737			$14,163			$23,089			$37,989		$	737		$	14,163		$	23,089		$	37,989
Net loss		—			—			(1,615	)		(1,615	)		—			—			(3,835	)		(3,835	)
Exercise of stock options, 12,671 shares (2,671 represent net exercises)		1			83			—			84			1			83			—			84
Special cash dividend, $1 per share of common stock outstanding		—			(7,371	)		—			(7,371	)		—			(7,371	)		—			(7,371	)
Purchase and retirement of common stock, 12,970 shares		(1	)		(98	)		—			(99	)
Purchase and retirement of common stock, 57,637 shares														(5	)		(381	)		—			(386	)
Stock based compensation expense		—			121			—			121			—			265			—			265
Cumulative effect of accounting change: adoption of FIN 48		—			—			(86	)		(86	)		—			—			(86	)		(86	)

Balance at April 30, 2007, 7,371,338 shares	$	737		$	6,898		$	21,388		$	29,023
Balance at July 31, 2007, 7,326,671 shares													$	733		$	6,759		$	19,168		$	26,660

During the first quarter of fiscal 2008, the Company declared and paid a special cash dividend of $1 per share of its outstanding common stock for a total payment of $7.4 million.

The Company calculates ~~basic~~ net earnings (loss) per share by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the reporting period. Diluted earnings (loss) per share reflects the effects of potentially dilutive securities. Since the Company incurred a net loss for the ~~quarters~~three and six months ended ~~April 30,~~July 31, 2007 and the six months ended July 31, 2006, basic and diluted ~~net~~ loss per share were the same because the inclusion of ~~6,952 and 73,229 potentially dilutive securities~~potential common shares related to outstanding stock options ~~respectively,~~in the calculation would have been antidilutive.

Potential common shares of 13 and 1,585 have been excluded from diluted weighted average common shares for the three and six months ended July 31, 2007, as the effect would have been antidilutive. Similarly, potential common shares of 64,005 have been excluded from diluted weighted average common shares for the six months ended July 31, 2006, as the effect would have been antidilutive.

The following table presents reconciliations of the numerators and denominators of the basic and diluted earnings (loss) per share computations for net income (loss). In the tables below, “Net income or loss” represents the numerator and “Shares” represents the denominator (in thousands, except per share amounts):

A significant portion of the Company’s revenue is derived from a limited number of customers. The customers providing 10 percent or more of the Company’s ~~revenues~~revenue for ~~either quarter ended April 30, 2007 or 2006~~any of the periods presented below are listed ~~below (in thousands).~~here:


	Three Months Ended April 30,				Three Months Ended July 31,
	2007		2006		2007				2006
					(In thousands)
Total revenue					$	5,919	100	%	$	12,972	100	%

Customer concentration:
Ventura County SAFE						796	13	%		—	—
San Bernardino County SAFE						667	11	%		—	—
Kensington Technology Group	$	252	$	4,105		400	7	%		4,243	33	%
Verizon Wireless		2,400		2,517		418	7	%		1,584	12	%

	$	2,652	$	6,622	$	2,281	38	%	$	5,827	45	%


					Six Months Ended July 31,
					2007				2006
					(In thousands)
Total revenue					$	11,334	100	%	$	23,528	100	%

Customer concentration:
Verizon Wireless						2,938	26	%		3,780	16	%
MTC SAFE						1,094	10	%		—	—
Kensington Technology Group						652	6	%		8,373	36	%

					$	4,684	42	%	$	12,153	52	%

The Verizon Wireless revenue amounts reported above are gross amounts, ~~exclusive of~~without reducing the revenue for revenue sharing amounts we accrue payable to SwissQual (see Note 2).

~~The~~In addition, the Company derived 4861 percent and 2430 percent of its revenue from governmental agencies in the ~~quarters~~three months ended ~~April 30,~~July 31, 2007, and 2006, respectively. The Company derived 56 percent and 32 percent of its revenue from governmental agencies in the six months ended July 31, 2007, and 2006, respectively.

The customers comprising 10 percent or more of the Company’s gross accounts receivable at either ~~April 30,~~July 31, 2007 or January 31, 2007 are listed below (in thousands).:


	April 30, 2007		January 31, 2007		July 31, 2007				January 31, 2007
Total gross accounts receivable	$	4,145	$	11,053	$	3,183	100	%	$	11,053	100	%

Customer concentration:
PCCW Limited						490	15	%		—	—
Kensington Technology Group		150		2,975		402	13	%		2,975	27	%
Global Wireless Solutions, Inc.		407		—
MTC SAFE		490		1,531		156	5	%		1,531	14	%
SwissQual		260		1,185		—	—			1,185	11	%

	$	1,307	$	5,691	$	1,048	33	%	$	5,691	52	%


	April 30, 2007		January 31, 2007		July 31, 2007		January 31, 2007
Raw materials	$	1,972	$	1,912	$	2,565	$	1,912
Work in process		73		195		29		195
Finished goods		3,064		3,345		1,485		3,345

	$	5,109	$	5,452	$	4,079	$	5,452


	April 30, 2007			January 31, 2007			July 31, 2007			January 31, 2007
Capitalized software development costs	$	8,444		$	8,444		$	8,444		$	8,444
Less: accumulated amortization		(8,340	)		(8,201	)		(8,405	)		(8,201	)

	$	104		$	243		$	39		$	243

There were no capitalized software development costs in the first ~~quarter~~and second quarters of the current and prior years. Amortization of software development costs for the ~~quarters~~six months ended ~~April 30,~~July 31, 2007 and 2006 totaled ~~$139,000~~$204,000 and ~~$326,000,~~$653,000, respectively, and have been reported in cost of revenue in the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements. Amortization of software development costs for the three months ended July 31, 2007 and 2006 totaled $65,000 and $326,000, respectively. The remaining net book value of ~~$104,000~~$39,000 is expected to be fully amortized in fiscal 2008.

Goodwill and acquired intangible assets consist of the following (in thousands):


	April 30, 2007			January 31, 2007			July 31, 2007			January 31, 2007
Goodwill	$	2,394		$	2,394		$	2,394		$	2,394

Acquired intangible assets:
Definite-lived intangible assets:
License rights		1,440			1,440		$	1,440		$	1,440
Intellectual property rights		1,244			1,244			1,244			1,244

		2,684			2,684			2,684			2,684
Less: accumulated amortization		(1,953	)		(1,864	)		(2,042	)		(1,864	)

Total acquired intangible assets, net	$	731		$	820
							$	642		$	820


	Mobile Power Products		Wireless Test Solutions		Call Box		Total		Mobile Power Products		Wireless Test Solutions		Call Box		Total
Balance as of April 30, 2007	$	—	$	1,898	$	496	$	2,394
Balance as of July 31, 2007									$	—	$	1,898	$	496	$	2,394

Balance as of January 31, 2007	$	—	$	1,898	$	496	$	2,394	$	—	$	1,898	$	496	$	2,394

The following table presents the future expected amortization of the definite-lived intangible assets (in thousands):


	Amortization Expense		Amortization Expense
Fiscal year:
2008		206	$	117
2009		178		178
2010		178		178
2011		126		126
2012		43		43
Thereafter		—		—

Total estimated amortization expense	$	731	$	642

Amortization of definite-lived acquired intangible assets for the quarters ended ~~April 30,~~July 31, 2007 and 2006 totaled $89,000 and ~~$132,000,~~$130,000, respectively. For the six months ended July 31, 2007 and 2006, amortization of definite-lived acquired intangible assets totaled $178,000 and $262,000, respectively. The Company ceased amortizing goodwill beginning February 1, 2002 upon adoption of SFAS No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets.”

The Company records an accrual for estimated warranty costs as products are sold. Warranty costs are estimated based on periodic analysis of historical experience. Changes in the estimated warranty accruals are recorded when the change in estimate is identified. A summary of the standard warranty accrual activity is shown in the table below (in thousands):


	April 30,						Six Months Ended July 31,
	2007			2006			2007			2006
Beginning balance	$	344		$	172		$	344		$	172
Utilization								(305	)		(311	)
Accruals for warranties issued during the period		40			155			65			430
Utilization		(235	)		(104	)

	$	149		$	223		$	104		$	291

The Company defers revenue relating to its WTS product sales for post contract support and warranty for the term of the maintenance commitment made at the time of the sale, generally one year. A summary of the post contract support and warranty activity is shown in the table below (in thousands):


	April 30,						Six Months Ended July 31,
	2007			2006			2007			2006
Beginning balance	$	551		$	1,476		$	551		$	1,476
Amortization of deferral								(469	)		(1,149	)
Deferral of revenue		198			288			276			614
Amortization of deferral		(243	)		(569	)

	$	506		$	1,195		$	358		$	941

Revenue for the Company’s extended post contract support and warranty contracts is deferred and recognized on a straight line basis over the contract period, typically one to four years. Costs incurred under separately priced extended warranty arrangements are expensed as incurred. A summary of the extended post contract support and warranty activity is shown in the table below (in thousands):


	April 30,						Six Months Ended July 31,
	2007			2006			2007			2006
Beginning balance	$	2,952		$	2,239		$	2,952		$	2,239
Recognition of revenue		(231	)		(205	)		(540	)		(392	)
Deferral of revenue for new contracts		270			460			443			1,194

	$	2,991		$	2,494		$	2,855		$	3,041

In the first quarter of fiscal 2008, 16,125 stock options were exercised as net exercises and therefore no cash was received upon exercise. The number of shares of Company common stock issued ~~as a result of these net exercises~~ totaled 2,671.

The Company has three reportable operating segments: mobile power products, wireless test solutions, and call box.

The mobile power products segment designs mobile power products for notebook computers, cellular telephones, PDAs, and other handheld devices.

The wireless test solutions segment designs and manufactures hardware and software tools for use by wireless carriers, equipment vendors, and others. Radio frequency engineers, professional technicians, and others use these tools to design, deploy, and optimize wireless networks, and to verify the performance of the wireless networks once deployed.

The call box segment designs and manufactures call box systems that provide emergency communication over existing wireless networks. In addition, the call box segment provides system installation and long-term maintenance services. Currently, the Company services and maintains approximately ~~10,400~~10,200 call boxes under long-term agreements.

Performance measurement and resource allocation for the reportable segments are based on many factors. The primary financial measures used are revenue and gross profit. The revenue, gross profit, gross margin, ~~income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes,~~ and total assets attributable to these segments are as follows (in thousands):


	Three Months Ended April 30, 2007														Three Months Ended July 31, 2007
	Mobile Power Products			Wireless Test Solutions			Call Box			Corporate		Total			Mobile Power Products			Wireless Test Solutions			Call Box			Total
Revenue	$	321		$	2,616		$	2,478		$	—	$	5,415		$	766		$	1,382		$	3,771		$	5,919
Cost of revenue		735			1,245			1,256			—		3,236			1,055			923			2,133			4,111

Gross profit (loss)	$	(414	)	$	1,371		$	1,222		$	—	$	2,179		$	(289	)	$	459		$	1,638		$	1,808

Gross margin		(129	)%		52.4	%		49.3	%		—		40.2	%		(37.7	)%		33.2	%		43.4	%		30.5	%

Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes	$	(1,489	)	$	(1,085	)	$	761		$	230	$	(1,583	)

The following table presents revenue by geographic ~~area consisted of~~region for the ~~following~~three and six months ended July 31, 2007 and 2006 (in thousands):


	Three Months Ended April 30,
Revenue by Region: (in thousands)					Three Months Ended July 31,				Six Months Ended July 31,
	2007		2006		2007		2006		2007		2006
North America	$	4,814	$	8,939	$	4,957	$	11,109	$	9,771	$	20,049
Europe		204		1,388		410		759		614		2,147
Asia		142		5		200		235		342		240
Latin America		255		223		352		869		607		1,092

	$	5,415	$	10,555	$	5,919	$	12,972	$	11,334	$	23,528

The Company generally issues purchase orders to its suppliers with delivery dates from four to six weeks from the purchase order date. In addition, the Company regularly provides significant suppliers with rolling six-month forecasts of material and finished goods requirements for planning and long-lead time parts procurement purposes only. The Company is committed to accepting delivery of materials pursuant to its purchase orders subject to various contract provisions that allow it to delay receipt of such order or allow it to cancel orders beyond certain agreed lead times. Such cancellations may or may not include cancellation costs payable by the Company. In the past, the Company has been required to take delivery of materials from its suppliers that were in excess of its requirements and the Company has previously recognized charges and expenses related to such excess material. If the Company is unable to adequately manage its suppliers and adjust such commitments for changes in demand, it may incur additional inventory expenses related to excess and obsolete inventory. Such expenses could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, results of operations, and financial position. Currently the Company has open purchase orders with a contract manufacturer in China in the amount of approximately $0.8 million relating to components for ChargeSource products currently in development. If some of these components are no longer needed due to design changes, we may not be able to cancel the orders in time to avoid incurring cancellation charges or taking delivery.

The Company has obligations to match employee contributions made to the Company’s savings and retirement plan. Generally, the Company’s obligation is equal to 100 percent of up to 5 percent of employees’ contributed earnings. If the Company is unable to meet the requisite matching, the Company’s Savings and Retirement Plan may need to be amended.

The Company has entered into severance compensation agreements with ~~three~~several key executives. These agreements require the Company to pay these executives, in the event of a termination of employment following a change of control of the Company, approximately up to twice the amount of their then current annual base salary and up to twice the amount of any bonus amount the executive would have achieved for the current year. The exact amount of this contingent obligation is not known and accordingly has not been recorded in the condensed consolidated financial statements.

In May 2006, the Company obtained a $500,000 letter of credit from US Bank pursuant to a lease provision for the Company’s corporate office, which was relocated in August 2006. The letter of credit is secured by a certificate of deposit with a 6-month maturity.

The Company is from time to time involved in various legal proceedings incidental to the conduct of its business. The Company believes that the outcome of all such pending legal proceedings will not in the aggregate have a material adverse effect on its consolidated results of operations and financial position.

ITEM 2.

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with our unaudited consolidated financial statements and the related notes and other financial information appearing elsewhere in this quarterly report on Form 10-Q.

This report, including the following discussion and analysis, contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Words such as “expects,” “anticipates,” “intends,” “plans,” “believes,” “seeks,” and “estimates,” and similar expressions or variations of such words are intended to identify forward-looking statements, but are not deemed to represent an all-inclusive means of identifying forward-looking statements included in this report. Additionally, statements concerning future matters are forward-looking statements.

These forward-looking statements reflect current views about our plans, strategies, and prospects, but can only be based on facts and factors currently known by us. Consequently, forward-looking statements are inherently subject to risks and uncertainties, and actual results and outcomes may differ materially from the results and outcomes discussed in or anticipated by the forward-looking statements. Among the important factors that could cause or contribute to such differences in results and outcomes include, without limitation, those specially addressed under the heading “Risk Factors” in our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended January 31, 2007.

Readers are urged not to place undue reliance on any forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date of this report. We undertake no obligation to revise or update any forward-looking statements in order to reflect any event or circumstance that may arise after the date of this report.

The financial information presented in this report is not audited and is not necessarily indicative of our future consolidated financial position, results of operations, or cash flow. Our fiscal year ends on January 31 and our fiscal quarters end on April 30, July 31, and October 31. Unless otherwise stated, all dates refer to our fiscal year and fiscal periods.

Comarco, Inc., through its subsidiary Comarco Wireless Technologies, Inc. (collectively, “we,” “Comarco,” or the “Company”), is a leading designer and manufacturer of external mobile power adapters used to power and charge notebook computers, mobile phones, PDAs, and many other rechargeable handheld devices. Comarco is also a provider of wireless test solutions for the wireless industry, as well as a provider of emergency call box systems and related maintenance services. Our operations consist solely of the operations of Comarco Wireless Technologies, Inc. (“CWT”).

Our revenue and related cash flows are primarily derived from sales of our ChargeSource mobile power products, wireless test solutions (“WTS”) products, and emergency call box systems and related maintenance services. We have three reportable segments: ChargeSource, WTS, and Call Box. See “Segment Reporting” in Note 15 of notes to our condensed consolidated financial statements included in Part I, Item 1 of this report.

The following table sets forth our revenue for the business segments for the three and six months ended ~~April 30,~~July 31, 2007 and 2006:


	Three Months Ended April 30,						Three Months Ended July 31,						Six Months Ended July 31,
	2007		2006		% Change		2007		2006		% Change		2007		2006		% Change
	(in thousands)						(in thousands)						(in thousands)
Revenue:
ChargeSource							$	766	$	4,517	(83.0	)%	$	1,087	$	8,666	(87.5	)%
WTS	$	2,616	$	3,572	(27	)%		1,382		3,710	(62.7	)%		3,998		7,283	(45.1	)%
Call Box		2,478		2,834	(13	)%		3,771		4,745	(20.5	)%		6,249		7,579	(17.5	)%
ChargeSource		321		4,149	(92	)%

	$	5,415	$	10,555	(49	)%	$	5,919	$	12,972	(54.4	)%	$	11,334	$	23,528	(51.8	)%

Management currently considers the following events, trends, and uncertainties to be important to understanding our three business segments and corresponding operating results for the ~~first quarter of fiscal 2008.~~three and six months ended July 31, 2007.

During the first quarter of fiscal 2008, we entered into a non-exclusive distribution arrangement with Kensington, thereby terminating our exclusive distribution agreement. Under the non-exclusive agreement, we have the right to penetrate all channels with multiple partners and Kensington has the right to purchase our products without volume minimums. Kensington is also able to purchase mobile power products from our competitors.

ChargeSource revenue for the ~~first~~second quarter of fiscal 2008 decreased significantly to ~~$0.3~~$0.8 million compared to ~~$4.1~~$4.5 million for the ~~first~~second quarter of fiscal ~~2007 and $3.8 million for the prior fiscal quarter.~~2007. Additionally, we entered the ~~second~~third quarter of fiscal 2008 with a backlog of purchase orders from Kensington that was significantly less than quarterly backlog levels of the prior fiscal ~~quarters.~~year. We currently believe Kensington is ~~continuing to sell through accumulated inventory of our ChargeSource products.~~sourcing certain external power adapters, which are not slim and light, from other Asian suppliers.

Initial product orders for generally available ChargeSource products from Kensington under the non-exclusive distribution agreement ~~are~~were significantly less than the number of units ordered on a monthly basis during fiscal 2007. Additionally, certain products ordered by Kensington are still under development and are expected to be available during the ~~second half~~fourth quarter of ~~fiscal 2008.~~

Successful development and release for manufacture of certain AC and AC/DC power adapter products designed to address the requirements of our retail and OEM accessories channels;

Successful development and release for manufacture of certain AC and AC/DC power adapter products designed to address the requirements of our retail, OEM accessories, and OEM “in-the-box” channels;

~~Securing additional~~Our ChargeSource products are based on proprietary patented construction technology that enables the production of slim and light power sources for many rechargeable mobile devices from standard wall outlets as well as power outlets in airplanes, cars and other modes of transportation. We currently expect to expand our product portfolio to include a product created for retail distribution ~~partners under non-exclusive arrangements,~~that can provide up to 90 Watts of continuous power and

generally available during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2008, has an input of 90 to 264 volts of alternating current and 10.5 to 18 volts of direct current auto/air operation and will be compliant with both the Restriction of Hazardous Substances (RoHS) directive and the U.S. ENERGY STAR program, and will meet all other standards for sale worldwide.

~~Sales in North America were down~~Current demand for our next-generation mobile test equipment continues to be soft across all our regions as wireless carriers delay deployment of capital for such mobile test tools. WTS revenue for the ~~first quarter of fiscal 2008~~three and six months ended July 31, 2007 decreased compared to ~~first quarter~~the corresponding periods of the prior fiscal ~~2007. This decrease is primarily due to decreased demand in~~year, underscoring the ~~wireless test equipment market in which~~challenges of our WTS ~~products are sold.~~

~~Sales~~business, which include a consolidating customer base comprised of a relatively small number of wireless carriers and equipment vendors, as well as uncertainty regarding the timing and amount of anticipated orders from such customer base. Additionally, we have experienced increased competition in our European region ~~were down for the first quarter of fiscal 2008 compared~~from SwissQual and others. We expect our ability to ~~the first quarter of fiscal 2007, also reflecting decreased demand from customers of~~compete on a global basis to be driven by our ~~WTS business. SwissQual, which was acquired by Spirent during January 2006, served~~ability to offer products that cover all current wireless technologies, as well as the ~~exclusive reseller~~timely integration of new technology and functionality into our ~~WTS products in our European region through December 31, 2006. SwissQual is now a direct competitor and is actively marketing competing QoS products globally.~~product platform.

As previously announced, we have entered into a cooperative alliance with Ascom, a leading specialist in wireless onsite communications solutions based in Switzerland, to develop, market, and support next-generation wireless network QoS, optimization, and test measurement systems. Together we are currently developing harmonized test and measurement systems and solutions for 3G and 4G wireless standards. These harmonized products and solutions are expected to be available during the second half of fiscal 2008.

We believe our Ascom alliance will enhance our technologies, positioning, and global footprint for sales and support. However, we are unsure as to what long term effect this alliance will have on future sales of our products. Our success will depend in part upon our ability to co-develop harmonized products and solutions under the Ascom alliance.

Current demand for our next-generation mobile test equipment continues to be soft across all our regions as wireless carriers delay deployment of capital for such mobile test tools. WTS revenue for first quarter of fiscal 2008 decreased compared to first quarter of fiscal 2007, underscoring the challenges of our WTS business, which include a consolidating customer base comprised of a relatively small number of wireless carriers and equipment vendors, as well as uncertainty regarding the timing and amount of anticipated orders from such customer base. Additionally, we have experienced increased competition in our European region from SwissQual and others. We expect our ability to compete on a global basis to be driven by our ability to offer products that cover all current wireless technologies, as well as the timely integration of new technology and functionality into our product platform.

During the ~~first~~second quarter of fiscal 2008, we upgraded ~~497~~1,287 call boxes with digital and/or text-telephony technologies and recorded revenue totaling approximately ~~$1.0~~$2.2 million. Such upgrade revenue also included revenue related to retrofit, site mitigation, and call box removal activities performed in conjunction with the upgrade of the call box systems. During ~~the first~~second quarter of fiscal 2007, we upgraded ~~528~~1,422 call boxes and recorded revenue totaling approximately ~~$1.4~~$3.2 million, which also includes revenue related to retrofit, site mitigation activities, and call box removal activities.

~~During~~Subsequent to the second quarter of fiscal ~~2007, the~~2008, a previously awarded contract to upgrade the call boxes owned by the Riverside County SAFE to digital technology was amended to also include the TTY technology upgrade. This project is valued at approximately $1.6 million and is expected to commence and substantially complete during the second half of fiscal 2008. The term of the corresponding maintenance agreement was also extended through June 2008.

The 1,400 call ~~boxes~~box system owned by Capital Valley Regional SAFE (“CVRS”) is currently being upgraded with digital and TTY technologies ~~was awarded to~~by a competitor. We currently expect to discontinue maintenance services in support of the CVRS call box system during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2008. Service revenue attributable to the CVRS maintenance ~~contracted~~contract totaled $0.5 million for fiscal 2007.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations is based upon our condensed consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The preparation of these condensed consolidated financial statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenue, and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. Management bases its estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that it believes to be reasonable under the circumstances. The results of these estimates form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ materially from our estimates.

An accounting policy is deemed to be critical if it requires an accounting estimate to be made based on assumptions about matters that are highly uncertain at the time the estimate is made, and if different estimates that reasonably could have been used or changes in the accounting estimate that are reasonably likely to occur could materially change the financial statements. No events occurred or circumstances changed during the ~~period~~three and six months ended ~~April 30,~~July 31, 2007 that required us to test goodwill for impairment. Management believes there have been no significant changes during the three and six months ended ~~April 30,~~July 31, 2007 to the items that we disclosed as our critical accounting policies and estimates in Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations in our annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2007.

   Three Months Ended April 30,    2007 over 2006
% Change
   2007    2006
   (in thousands)
Revenue:

Americas:

North America
   $ 4,814    $ 8,939    (46 )%
Others
   255    223    14 %
Europe
   204    1,388    (85 )%
Asia – Pacific
   142    5    2,740 %

   $ 5,415    $ 10,555    (49 )%


	Three Months Ended July 31,					Six Months Ended July 31,						Year over Year % Change
	2007			2006		2007			2006			Three Months		Six Months
Revenue:
Products	$	4,746		$	11,773	$	9,027		$	21,161		(60	)%	(57	)%
Services		1,173			1,199		2,307			2,367		(2	)%	(3	)%

	$	5,919		$	12,972	$	11,334		$	23,528		(54	)%	(52	)%

Operating income (loss)	$	(2,707	)	$	21	$	(4,884	)	$	(844	)

~~The first quarter of fiscal 2008 decrease~~ (in ~~revenue of $5.1~~thousands except change)

Revenue for the three and six months ended July 31, 2007 decreased by $7.1 million, or 54 percent, and $12.2 million, or 52 percent, respectively, compared to the ~~first quarter~~corresponding period of fiscal ~~2007,~~2007. The decrease is attributable to ~~decreased~~declines in revenue ~~from~~in all three of our businesses, with ChargeSource and WTS decreasing ~~approximately~~ $3.8 million and ~~$1.0~~$2.3 million, respectively, ~~reflecting~~in the second quarter of fiscal 2008 and $7.6 million and $3.3 million, respectively, for the six months ended July 31, 2007 compared to the same periods of the prior fiscal year. These decreases continue to reflect the transition of our ChargeSource distribution to a non-exclusive model and general weakness in the wireless test equipment market in which WTS operates.


	Three Months Ended April 30,								2007 over 2006 % Change
	2007				2006				2007 over 2006 % Change		Three Months Ended July 31,								Six Months Ended July 31,								Year over Year % Change
	(in thousands)										2007				2006				2007				2006				Three Months		Six Months
			% of Related Revenue				% of Related Revenue						% of Related Revenue				% of Related Revenue				% of Related Revenue				% of Related Revenue
Cost of revenue:
Products	$	2,338	55	%	$	5,877	63	%	(60	)%	$	3,237	68	%	$	7,160	61	%	$	5,575	62	%	$	13,037	62	%	(55	)%	(57	)%
Amortization – software development products		134	3	%		321	3	%	(58	)%
Amortization – software development												59	1	%		321	3	%		193	2	%		642	3	%	(82	)%	(70	)%

		2,472	58	%		6,198	66	%	(60	)%		3,296	69	%		7,481	64	%		5,768	64	%		13,679	65	%	(56	)%	(58	)%

Services		759	67	%		821	70	%	(8	)%		810	69	%		760	63	%		1,568	68	%		1,581	67	%	7	%	(1	)%
Amortization – software development services		5	—			5	1	%	—
Amortization – software development												5	1	%		5	1	%		11	—			11	—		—		—

		764	67	%		826	71	%	(8	)%		815	70	%		765	64	%		1,579	68	%		1,592	67	%	7	%	(1	)%

	$	3,236	60	%	$	7,024	67	%	(54	)%	$	4,111	70	%	$	8,246	64	%	$	7,347	65	%	$	15,271	65	%	(50	)%	(52	)%


	Three Months Ended April 30,				2007 over 2006 ppt Change	Three Months Ended July 31,				Six Months Ended July 31,				Year over Year ppt Change
	2007		2006		2007 over 2006 ppt Change	2007		2006		2007		2006		Three Months		Six Months
Gross margin:
Products	42	%	34	%	8	31	%	36	%	36	%	35	%	(5	)	1
Services	33	%	29	%	4	30	%	36	%	32	%	33	%	(6	)	(1	)
Combined gross margin	40	%	33	%	7	30	%	36	%	35	%	35	%	(6	)	—

~~The first quarter of fiscal 2008 decrease in cost~~Cost of revenue ~~of $3.8~~for the three and six months ended July 31, 2007 decreased by $4.1 million, ~~compared to first quarter of fiscal 2007, was primarily attributable to a 49~~or 50 percent, ~~volume decrease in revenue~~and $7.9 million, or 52 percent, respectively, compared to the ~~first quarter~~corresponding periods of fiscal 2007. These decreases are consistent with revenue declines of 54 percent and 52 percent for the same periods.


	Three Months Ended April 30,								2007 over 2006 % Change
	2007				2006				2007 over 2006 % Change		Three Months Ended July 31,								Six Months Ended July 31,								Year over Year % Change
	(in thousands)										2007				2006				2007				2006				Three Months		Six Months
			% of Revenue				% of Revenue						% of Revenue				% of Revenue				% of Revenue				% of Revenue
Operating expenses:
Selling, general, and administrative expenses, excluding corporate overhead	$	1,206	22	%	$	1,270	12	%	(5	)%
SG&A expenses											$	1,071	18	%	$	1,366	10	%	$	2,277	20	%	$	2,637	11	%	(22	)%	(14	)%
Allocated corporate overhead		1,200	22	%		1,247	12	%	(4	)%		1,285	22	%		1,240	10	%		2,485	22	%		2,487	11	%	4	%	—
Gross engineering and support expenses		1,951	36	%		1,879	18	%	4	%		2,159	36	%		2,099	16	%		4,109	36	%		3,977	17	%	3	%	3	%

	$	4,357	80	%	$	4,396	42	%	(1	)%	$	4,515	76	%	$	4,705	36	%	$	8,871	78	%	$	9,101	39	%	(4	)%	(3	)%

Selling, general, and administrative expenses for the three and six months ended July 31, 2007 decreased $0.3 million, or 22 percent, and $0.4 million, or 14 percent, respectively, compared to the corresponding periods of fiscal 2007. The decreases are caused by reduced personnel and related costs of the sales and administrative staff for the ChargeSource and WTS businesses.

Allocated corporate overhead consists of salaries and other personnel-related expenses of our accounting and finance, human resources and benefits, and other administrative personnel, as well as professional fees, directors’ fees, and other costs and expenses attributable to being a public company. These costs are typically allocated to our three segments based on each business’s percentage share of total Company costs and expenses.

~~Operating expenses~~ Allocated corporate overhead remained ~~relatively stable in~~consistent for the ~~first quarter of fiscal 2008~~three and six months ended July 31, 2007 compared to the ~~first quarter~~comparable periods of fiscal 2007. As revenue has declined in both the three and six month periods ending July 31, 2007 ~~because our fixed~~compared to the corresponding periods of the prior year, allocated corporate overhead ~~is generally unchanged. As revenues decline, however, these~~ expenses represent a larger percentage of revenue than in ~~the current year than~~ the prior year. The fixed cost structure of our ~~various businesses~~business has been maintained to support current and expected future ~~business, even though for ChargeSource~~business.

Gross engineering and ~~WTS these~~support expenses generally consist of salaries, employer paid benefits, and other personnel related costs ~~exceeded revenue~~of our hardware and software design engineers and testing and product support personnel, as well as facility and IT costs, professional and consulting fees, lab costs, material usages, and travel and related costs incurred in the ~~first quarter~~development and support of ~~fiscal 2008.~~our products. Engineering and support expenses for the three and six months ended July 31, 2007 increased $0.1 million, or 3 percent. This increase is primarily due to increased ChargeSource engineering expenses, consisting of material usage and lab fees in support of our on-going efforts to develop new products for our retail and OEM accessories channels.

Other income, net, consists primarily of interest income earned on invested cash balances. ~~Other~~Interest income ~~net,~~earned on invested cash balances for the ~~first quarter of fiscal 2008 increased approximately $45,000 compared to~~three and six months ended July 31, 2007 totaled $218,000 and $499,000, respectively. For the ~~first quarter of fiscal 2007.~~three and six months ended July 31, 2006, interest income totaled $221,000 and $450,000, respectively. The current year increase in ~~other~~interest income is due to increased invested cash balances and increased interest rates earned on ~~higher~~ invested cash balances.

The gain on sale of equipment recorded during the first quarter of fiscal 2008 relates to the sale of WTS equipment, the majority of which was previously leased to outsourced engineering services providers.

During the second quarter of fiscal 2008, we received additional sale consideration based on earn-out provisions totaling approximately $0.3 million, net of $21,000 of transaction costs, from Spirent, the acquirer of our 18 percent interest in SwissQual (see Note 6).

Significant management judgment is required in determining our provision for income taxes, our deferred tax assets and liabilities, and any required valuation allowance. During the second quarter of fiscal 2005, we established a valuation allowance totaling approximately $2.9 million, or the entire deferred tax asset balance existing as of the beginning of fiscal 2005, as reclassified. This valuation allowance was established based on management’s overall assessment of risks and uncertainties related to our future ability to realize, and hence, utilize certain deferred tax assets, primarily consisting of net operating losses, carry forward temporary differences, and future tax deductions resulting from certain types of stock option exercises. Due to the losses of the first ~~quarter,~~and second quarters, the adjusted net deferred tax assets remain fully reserved as of ~~April 30,~~July 31, 2007.

The Company adopted FIN 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes – An Interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109,” on February 1, 2007. As a result of the adoption of FIN 48, the Company recorded an $86,000 decrease in retained earnings and increased non-current liabilities by $86,000.

Revenue for the three and six months ended July 31, 2007 decreased by $3.8 million, or 83 percent, and $7.6 million, or 88 percent, respectively, compared to corresponding periods of fiscal ~~2008~~2007. The decrease in ~~ChargeSource~~ revenue ~~of $3.8 million compared to the first quarter of fiscal 2007 was~~is primarily due to the decrease in sales to Kensington. ~~During the fourth quarter of fiscal~~As previously discussed, in April 2007 we ~~commenced negotiations to amend our exclusive~~entered into a non-exclusive retail distribution agreement with Kensington to allow us to partner with multiple retail distributors on a non-exclusive basis and address certain underserved geographic regions, as well as additional domestic national retailers. In April 2007, we accomplished this objective and entered into a non-exclusive retail distribution agreement with Kensington. Duringdistributors. Since the fourth quarter of fiscal 2007, ~~and the first quarter of fiscal 2008,~~ we ~~did~~have not ~~receive~~received significant new orders from Kensington for products scheduled to be delivered in the ~~first~~current fiscal year. We currently believe Kensington is sourcing certain external power adapters, which are not slim and ~~second quarters~~light, from other Asian suppliers resulting in decreased orders for our slim and light ChargeSource products. Additionally, certain products ordered by Kensington are still under development and are expected to be available during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2008. ~~We believe Kensington reduced their product orders~~On a sequential basis, revenue in ~~an effort to reduce their inventory of previously purchased ChargeSource products.~~

~~The first~~the second quarter of fiscal 2008 ~~decrease in cost of revenue of $2.2~~increased by $0.4 million, ~~was attributable to a 92~~or 139 percent, ~~volume decrease in revenue~~ compared to the first quarter of fiscal 2008.

Cost of revenue for the three and six months ended July 31, 2007 ~~as discussed above.~~decreased by $2.3 million, or 69 percent, and $4.6 million, or 72 percent, respectively, compared to the corresponding periods of fiscal 2007. The decrease in cost of revenue is primarily due to the decrease in revenue for the three and six months ended July 31, 2007 compared to the corresponding periods of the prior fiscal year. The current level of ChargeSource revenue is insufficient to fully absorb our fixed manufacturing overhead. Cost of revenue for the ~~first quarter of fiscal 2008~~three and six months ended July 31, 2007 included approximately $0.5 million and $1.1 million of ~~allocated~~ under-absorbed fixed manufacturing overhead.


	Three Months Ended April 30,								2007 over 2006 % Change
	2007				2006				2007 over 2006 % Change		Three Months Ended July 31,								Six Months Ended July 31,								Year over Year % Change
	(in thousands)										2007				2006				2007				2006				Three Months		Six Months
			% of Revenue				% of Revenue						% of Revenue				% of Revenue				% of Revenue				% of Revenue
Operating expenses:
Selling, general, and administrative expenses, excluding corporate overhead	$	386	120	%	$	424	10	%	(9	)%
SG&A expenses											$	401	52	%	$	445	10	%	$	787	72	%	$	869	10	%	(10	)%	(9	)%
Allocated corporate overhead		276	86	%		470	11	%	(41	)%		366	48	%		453	10	%		642	59	%		922	10	%	(19	)%	(30	)%
Gross engineering and support expenses		423	132	%		414	10	%	2	%		546	71	%		426	9	%		969	89	%		840	10	%	28	%	15	%

	$	1,085	338	%	$	1,308	31	%	(17	)%	$	1,313	171	%	$	1,324	29	%	$	2,398	220	%	$	2,631	30	%	(1	)%	(9	)%

Selling, general, and administrative expenses generally consist of salaries, employer paid benefits, commissions and other personnel related costs of our management, sales, marketing, and administrative personnel, facility and IT costs, professional fees, advertising, promotions, printed media, and travel directly attributable to our ChargeSource business. Selling, general, and administrative expenses in the three and six months ended July 31, 2007 decreased by approximately $44,000, or 10 percent, and approximately $0.1 million, or 9 percent, compared to the corresponding periods of fiscal 2007. The decrease is primarily due to reduced personnel costs in both the three and six month periods.

See the section above entitled “Consolidated” under the caption “Operating Costs and Expenses” for a discussion of allocated corporate overhead.

Gross engineering and support expenses generally consist of salaries, employer paid benefits, and other personnel related costs of our electrical and mechanical design engineers and testing and product support personnel, as well as facility and IT costs, professional and consulting fees, lab costs, material usages, and travel and related costs incurred in the development and support of our ChargeSource business. Engineering and support expenses for the three and six months ended July 31, 2007 increased $0.1 million, or 28 percent, and $0.1 million, or 15 percent. The increase in gross engineering and support expenses is due to increased material usages and lab costs as new products are currently in development.


	Three Months Ended April 30,										2007 over 2006 % Change
	2007					2006					2007 over 2006 % Change
	(in thousands)													Three Months Ended July 31,						Six Months Ended July 31,						Year over Year % Change
				% of Revenue					% of Revenue					2007			2006			2007			2006			Three Months		Six Months
Revenue:
Products	$	2,492		95	%	$	3,536		99	%	(30	)%		$	1,339		$	3,631		$	3,831		$	7,168		(63	)%	(47	)%
Services		124		5	%		36		1	%	244	%			43			79			167			115		(46	)%	(45	)%

	$	2,616		100	%	$	3,572		100	%	(27	)%		$	1,382		$	3,710		$	3,998		$	7,283		(63	)%	(45	)%

Operating loss	$	(1,430	)			$	(888	)						$	(2,039	)	$	(605	)	$	(3,469	)	$	(1,492	)


*Revenue by Region* *(in thousands except change)*													*Revenue by Region* *(in thousands except change)*
														Three Months Ended July 31,						Six Months Ended July 31,						Year over Year % Change
														2007			2006			2007			2006			Three Months		Six Months
Revenue:
Americas:
North America														$	817		$	2,004		$	2,971		$	4,568		(59	)%	(35	)%
Others															352			869			607			1,092		(59	)%	(44	)%
Europe															13			642			78			1,423		(98	)%	(95	)%
Asia – Pacific															200			195			342			200		3	%	71	%

														$	1,382		$	3,710		$	3,998		$	7,283		(63	)%	(45	)%

~~The first quarter of fiscal 2008 decrease of product revenue of $1.0~~Revenue for the three months ended July 31, 2007 decreased by $2.3 million, or 63 percent, compared to the ~~first quarter~~corresponding period of fiscal ~~2007 was~~2007. The second quarter decrease is attributable to decreased demand for our WTS products in ~~both North America~~the Americas and Europe. ~~During~~For the ~~first~~second quarter of fiscal 2008, sales to Verizon Wireless decreased $1.2 million as our largest customer in North America substantially completed a roll-out of the Seven.Five systems in their regions. Additionally, sales to SwissQual, the former exclusive reseller of our WTS products in our European region, decreased approximately ~~$0.7~~$0.5 million compared to the ~~first~~second quarter of fiscal 2007. Due to the sale of SwissQual to Spirent in January 2006, SwissQual ceased to be our reseller in Europe effective December 31, 2006.

Revenue for the six months ended July 31, 2007 decreased by $3.3 million, or 45 percent, compared to the corresponding period of fiscal 2007. This decrease is primarily attributable to decreased sales from our regions in the Americas and Europe. For the six months ended July 31, 2007, revenue derived from our North American and European regions decreased by $1.6 million and $1.3 million, or 35 percent and 95 percent, respectively, compared to the six months ended July 31, 2006. These period comparisons highlight that the wireless industry is composed of a relatively small number of wireless carriers and equipment vendors, which can lead to volatility in our results.


	Three Months Ended April 30,								2007 over 2006 % Change
	2007				2006				2007 over 2006 % Change		Three Months Ended July 31,								Six Months Ended July 31,								Year over Year % Change
	(in thousands)										2007				2006				2007				2006				Three Months		Six Months
			% of Related Revenue				% of Related Revenue						% of Related Revenue				% of Related Revenue				% of Related Revenue				% of Related Revenue
Cost of revenue:
Products	$	1,019	41	%	$	1,587	45	%	(36	)%	$	783	58	%	$	1,206	33	%	$	1,803	47	%	$	2,793	39	%	(35	)%	(35	)%
Amortization – software development products		134	5	%		321	9	%	(58	)%
Amortization – software development												59	4	%		321	9	%		193	5	%		642	9	%	(82	)%	(70	)%

		1,153	46	%		1,908	54	%	(40	)%		842	63	%		1,527	42	%		1,996	52	%		3,435	48	%	(45	)%	(42	)%

Services		92	74	%		17	47	%	441	%		81	188	%		49	62	%		173	104	%		66	57	%	65	%	162	%

	$	1,245	48	%	$	1,925	54	%	(35	)%	$	923	67	%	$	1,576	42	%	$	2,169	54	%	$	3,501	48	%	(41	)%	(38	)%

   Three Months Ended April 30, 2007 over 2006
ppt Change
   2007 2006
Gross margin:

Products
   54 % 46 % 8
Services
   26 % 53 % (27 )
Combined gross margin
   52 % 46 % 6

~~The first quarter~~Cost of revenue for the three and six months ended July 31, 2007 decreased by $0.7 million, or 41 percent, and $1.3 million, or 38 percent, respectively, compared to the corresponding periods of fiscal ~~2008~~2007. The decrease in cost of revenue for the three and six months ended July 31, 2007 is driven by decreased sales volume of ~~$0.7 million was attributable to a 27~~63 percent ~~volume decrease in revenue~~ and ~~decreased amortization~~45 percent, respectively.

Amortization of previously capitalized software development costs ~~compared to~~for the ~~first quarter of fiscal 2007.~~three and six months ended July 31, 2007 totaled $0.1 million and $0.2 million, respectively. Currently, we do not expect to ~~fully amortize previously capitalized~~capitalize any additional software development bycosts through the end of fiscal 2008.


	Three Months Ended April 30,								2007 over 2006 % Change
	2007				2006				2007 over 2006 % Change		Three Months Ended July 31,								Six Months Ended July 31,								Year over Year % Change
	(in thousands)										2007				2006				2007				2006				Three Months		Six Months
			% of Revenue				% of Revenue						% of Revenue				% of Revenue				% of Revenue				% of Revenue
Operating expenses:
Selling, general, and administrative expenses, excluding corporate overhead	$	737	28	%	$	737	21	%	—
SG&A expenses											$	538	39	%	$	803	22	%	$	1,275	32	%	$	1,541	21	%	(33	)%	(17	)%
Allocated corporate overhead		662	25	%		483	13	%	37	%		482	35	%		407	11	%		1,144	29	%		890	12	%	18	%	29	%
Gross engineering and support expenses		1,402	54	%		1,315	37	%	7	%		1,478	107	%		1,529	41	%		2,879	72	%		2,843	39	%	(3	)%	1	%

	$	2,801	107	%	$	2,535	71	%	11	%	$	2,498	181	%	$	2,739	74	%	$	5,298	133	%	$	5,274	72	%	(9	)%	1	%

Selling, general, and administrative expenses generally consist of salaries, employer paid benefits, commissions and other personnel related costs of our sales, marketing, and support personnel, facility and IT costs, professional fees, advertising, promotions, printed media, and travel directly attributable to our WTS business. Selling, general, and administrative expenses for the three and six months ended July 31, 2007 decreased $0.3 million compared to the corresponding periods of fiscal 2007, primarily due to reduced sales and marketing personnel and related costs, offset by increased legal fees in administering our post-sale relationship with SwissQual.

See the section above entitled “Consolidated” under the caption “Operating Costs and Expenses” for a discussion of allocated corporate overhead.

Gross engineering and support expenses generally consist of salaries, employer paid benefits, and other personnel related costs of our hardware and software design engineers and testing and product support personnel, as well as facility and IT costs, professional and consulting fees, lab costs, material usages, and travel and related costs incurred in the development and support of our WTS business. Engineering and support expenses for the three and six months ended July 31, 2007 remained stable as our costs in support of our on-going efforts to replace Seven.Five software content previously provided by SwissQual remain consistent.

We capitalize costs incurred for the development of software embedded in our WTS products subsequent to establishing technological feasibility. These capitalized costs are subject to an ongoing assessment of recoverability based on anticipated future revenue and changes in hardware and software technologies. Costs that are capitalized include direct labor and related overhead. We did not capitalize any software development costs in the ~~first quarter~~three and six months ending July 31, 2007 and 2006 as we completed the development of ~~fiscal 2008 or 2007.~~the software embedded in our Seven.Five product platform prior to such periods.


	Three Months Ended April 30,				2007 over 2006 % Change			Three Months Ended July 31,				Six Months Ended July 31,				Year over Year % Change
					2007 over 2006 % Change			2007		2006		2007		2006		Three Months		Six Months
Revenue:
Products								$	2,641	$	3,625	$	4,109	$	5,327	(27	)%	(23	)%
Services									1,130		1,120		2,140		2,252	1	%	(5	)%

								$	3,771	$	4,745	$	6,249	$	7,579	(21	)%	(18	)%

Operating income								$	934	$	826	$	1,686	$	976


*Revenue by Region* *(in thousands except change)*							*Revenue by Region* *(in thousands except change)*
	2007		2006		2007 over 2006 % Change			Three Months Ended July 31,				Six Months Ended July 31,				Year over Year % Change
	(in thousands)				2007 over 2006 % Change			2007		2006		2007		2006		Three Months		Six Months
Revenue:
Americas:
North America	$	2,478	$	2,834	(13	)%		$	3,771	$	4,745	$	6,249	$	7,579	(21	)%	(18	)%
Others		—		—	—				—		—		—		—	—		—
Europe		—		—	—				—		—		—		—	—		—
Asia – Pacific		—		—	—				—		—		—		—	—		—

	$	2,478	$	2,834	(13	)%		$	3,771	$	4,745	$	6,249	$	7,579	(21	)%	(18	)%

~~The first quarter~~ for the three and six months ended July 31, 2007 decreased by $1.0 million, or 21 percent, and $1.3 million, or 18 percent, respectively, compared to corresponding periods of fiscal ~~2008~~2007. The decrease in ~~call box~~ revenue ~~of $0.4 million compared to the first quarter of fiscal 2007,~~ was primarily attributable to ~~a decrease in~~decreased sales of digital and TTY upgrades to our installed base of call box systems under maintenance contracts. During the ~~first quarter of fiscal 2008,~~three and six months ended July 31, 2007, we upgraded ~~497~~1,287 and 1,784 call boxes with digital and/or TTY technologies, respectively, and recorded revenue totaling approximately ~~$1.0 million.~~$2.2 million and $3.2 million, respectively. Such upgrade revenue also included revenue related to retrofit, site mitigation, and call box removal activities performed in conjunction with the upgrade of the call box ~~systems, which totaled approximately $0.1 million. For~~system. During the ~~first quarter of fiscal 2007~~three and six months ended July 31, 2006, we upgraded ~~528~~1,422 and 1,710 call boxes, respectively, and recorded revenue totaling approximately ~~$1.4~~$3.2 million ~~which also includes revenue related to retrofit, site mitigation activities,~~ and ~~call box removal activities, which totaled approximately $0.3 million.~~$4.6 million, respectively. Non-upgrade revenue attributable to sales of new call boxes for ~~first quarter of fiscal 2008~~the three and six months ended July 31, 2007 totaled approximately ~~$0.5~~$0.4 million and $0.9 million, respectively, compared to $0.3 million ~~respectively.~~and $0.6 million for the corresponding periods of the prior fiscal year.


	Three Months Ended April 30,								2007 over 2006 % Change
	2007				2006				2007 over 2006 % Change		Three Months Ended July 31,								Six Months Ended July 31,								Year over Year % Change
	(in thousands)										2007				2006				2007				2006				Three Months		Six Months
			% of Related Revenue				% of Related Revenue						% of Related Revenue				% of Related Revenue				% of Related Revenue				% of Related Revenue
Cost of revenue:
Products	$	584	40	%	$	1,321	78	%	(56	)%	$	1,399	53	%	$	2,561	71	%	$	1,982	48	%	$	3,881	73	%	(45	)%	(49	)%

Amortization – software development												—	—			—	—			—	—			—	—		—		—

												1,399	53	%		2,561	71	%		1,982	48	%		3,881	73	%	(45	)%	(49	)%

Services		667	66	%		804	71	%	(17	)%		729	65	%		711	63	%		1,395	65	%		1,515	67	%	3	%	(8	)%
Amortization – software development products		5	1	%		5	1	%	—
Amortization – software development												5	—			5	1	%		11	1	%		11	1	%	—		—

		672	67	%		809	72	%	(17	)%		734	65	%		716	64	%		1,406	66	%		1,526	68	%	3	%	(8	)%

	$	1,256	51	%	$	2,130	75	%	(41	)%	$	2,133	57	%	$	3,277	69	%	$	3,388	54	%	$	5,407	71	%	(35	)%	(37	)%

   Three Months Ended April 30, 2007 over 2006
ppt Change
   2007 2006
Gross margin:

Products
   60 % 22 % 38
Services
   33 % 28 % 5
Combined gross margin
   49 % 25 % 24

~~The first quarter~~Cost of product revenue for the three and six months ended July 31, 2007 decreased by $1.2 million, or 45 percent, and $1.9 million, or 49 percent, respectively, compared to the corresponding period of the prior fiscal ~~2008~~year. For the three and six months ended July 31, 2007, cost of product revenue as a percentage of product revenue decreased 18 percentage points and 25 percentage points, respectively, compared to the corresponding period of the prior fiscal year. The decrease in cost of product revenue as a percentage of ~~approximately $0.7~~product revenue for the three and six months ended July 31, 2007 is attributable to decreased use of third parties to perform certain upgrade installation, site mitigation, and retrofit work.

We had fewer active upgrade projects during the three and six months ended July 31, 2007 and therefore third party subcontractor costs decreased. Third party contractor costs decreased by $0.3 million and $0.5 million for the three and six months ended July 31, 2007, respectively, compared to the ~~first quarter~~corresponding periods of fiscal 2007. Additionally, allocated under-absorbed fixed manufacturing overhead decreased by $0.2 million and $0.3 million for the three and six months ended July 31, 2007, ~~was partially attributable~~respectively, compared to ~~a 14 percent volume decrease in product revenue. Additionally,~~the corresponding periods of fiscal 2007. Finally, cost of product revenue for the ~~first quarter of fiscal 2008~~three months ended April 30, 2007 includes credits totaling approximately $0.3 million for an expired and unused settlement obligation to a former call box customer and previously accrued warranty obligations related to recently installed call box upgrades. No such credits were recorded during the ~~first quarter~~three and six months of the prior fiscal year. Excluding these credits and the decrease in incremental subcontractor and manufacturing overhead costs, cost of product revenue for the ~~first quarter of fiscal 2008~~three and six months ended July 31, 2007, as a percentage of product revenue ~~was 59 percent. Finally, cost of revenue~~were 72 percent and 75 percent, respectively, compared to 71 percent and 73 percent for the ~~first quarter of fiscal 2007 includes approximately $0.2 million in incremental costs paid to subcontractors~~three and allocated under-absorbed fixed manufacturing overhead compared to the first quarter of fiscal 2008. Excluding these incremental costs, cost of revenue for the first quarter of fiscal 2007 as a percentage of revenue was approximately 67 percent.six months ended July 31, 2006, respectively.


	Three Months Ended April 30,								2007 over 2006 % Change
	2007				2006				2007 over 2006 % Change		Three Months Ended July 31,								Six Months Ended July 31,								Year over Year % Change
	(in thousands)										2007				2006				2007				2006				Three Months		Six Months
			% of Revenue				% of Revenue						% of Revenue				% of Revenue				% of Revenue				% of Revenue
Operating expenses:
Selling, general, and administrative expenses, excluding corporate overhead	$	83	3	%	$	109	4	%	(24	)%
SG&A expenses											$	132	3	%	$	118	3	%	$	215	4	%	$	227	3	%	12	%	(5	)%
Allocated corporate overhead		262	11	%		294	10	%	(11	)%		437	12	%		380	8	%		699	11	%		675	9	%	15	%	4	%
Gross engineering and support expenses		126	5	%		150	5	%	(16	)%		135	4	%		144	3	%		261	4	%		294	4	%	(6	)%	(11	)%

	$	471	19	%	$	553	19	%	(15	)%	$	704	19	%	$	642	14	%	$	1,175	19	%	$	1,196	16	%	10	%	(2	)%

Selling, general, and administrative expenses generally consist of salaries, employer paid benefits, commissions and other personnel related costs of our management, inside sales, and administrative personnel, facility and IT costs, professional fees, advertising, promotions, printed media, and travel directly attributable to our call box business. Selling, general, and administrative expenses for the three and six months ended July 31, 2007 remained fairly comparable both as a percentage of revenue and in real dollar amounts, to the corresponding periods of the prior fiscal year.

See the section above entitled “Consolidated” under the caption “Operating Costs and Expenses” for a discussion of allocated corporate overhead.

Cash and cash equivalents at ~~April 30,~~July 31, 2007 decreased ~~$4.4~~$5.4 million to ~~$22.0~~$21.0 million as compared to $26.4 million at January 31, 2007. The following table is a summary of our Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows.


	Three Months Ended April 30,						Six Months Ended July 31,
	2007			2006			2007			2006
	(in thousands)						(in thousands)
Cash provided by (used in):
Cash used in:
Operating activities	$	2,722		$	(2,576	)	$	1,909		$	(356	)
Investing activities		303			(264	)		406			(2,192	)
Financing activities		(7,387	)		—			(7,673	)		(480	)

Cash generated by operating activities of ~~$2.7~~$1.9 million for the ~~first quarter of fiscal 2008~~six months ended July 31, 2007 was driven by ~~collections~~collection of accounts receivable of ~~$6.9~~$7.8 million and a reduction in inventory of $1.3 million, offset by our net loss of ~~$1.6~~$3.8 million and a reduction in accrued liabilities of ~~$2.8~~$3.2 million, primarily due to vendor payments for inventory, ~~as well as~~ income tax ~~payments.~~

~~As of April 30, 2007 we have accrued $610,000 payable~~payments, and revenue sharing paid to SwissQual ~~for revenue sharing related to our Wireless Test Solutions sales for calendar year 2007. We expect to pay this liability~~ in ~~full during~~ the ~~current fiscal year.~~amount of $632,000.

Cash used in operating activities of ~~$2.6~~$0.4 million for the ~~first quarter of fiscal 2007~~six months ended July 31, 2006 was driven by a net loss of ~~$0.6~~$0.3 million and a reduction in accrued liabilities of approximately ~~$3.9~~$2.6 million, primarily due to vendor

payments for inventory as well as the distribution of incentive compensation, partially offset by non-cash charges totaling ~~$0.8~~$1.5 million and ~~$0.3~~$0.5 million for depreciation and amortization and provisions for obsolete inventory, respectively. Also, a net change in other operating assets and liabilities resulted in a ~~$0.9~~$0.4 million increase in cash flow. Within the net change in other operating assets and liabilities, ~~increased sales resulted in an increase in~~ inventory ~~decreasing~~decreased by $1.0 million, increasing cash flow, ~~by $0.1 million,~~ which was offset by a ~~$0.2~~$0.9 million increase in ~~deferred revenue and a $0.7 million increase in accounts payable.~~other assets, which relates to amounts due from our new landlord for tenant improvement reimbursements.

During the ~~first quarter of fiscal 2008~~six months ended July 31, 2007 we ~~accrued~~received $361,000 relating primarily to the sale of ~~wireless test solutions~~WTS equipment that had been previously ~~leased. We also purchased $58,000 of property~~leased, and ~~equipment.~~

~~Net cash used~~we collected $269,000 in ~~investing activities was $0.3 million in~~contingent consideration from SwissQual relating to the January 2006 sale to Spirent (see Note 6). During the first ~~quarter~~six months of fiscal ~~2007. We~~2008 we spent $224,000 of capitalized expenditures, mostly relating to tooling and other equipment for ChargeSource.

During the six months ended July 31, 2006 we purchased approximately ~~$0.4~~$1.8 million of property and equipment relating primarily to tenant improvements made during our corporate relocation as well as equipment built for a revenue sharing contract with one of our WTS customers. Additionally, during the six months ended July 31, 2006 we obtained a letter of credit in the ~~first quarter~~amount of ~~fiscal 2007 and received payments~~$500,000 from ~~SwissQual~~US Bank, secured by a certificate of ~~$82,000 relating to escrowed consideration.~~deposit with a 6-month maturity required by the lease for our new corporate office.

During the first quarter of fiscal 2008 we declared and paid a special dividend of $1 per share of our outstanding common stock for a total payment of $7.4 million. During the six months ended July 31, 2007 we repurchased approximately 58,000 shares in the open market for a total cost of $0.4 million, or an average price of $6.70 per share.

During fiscal 2007 we repurchased approximately 51,000 shares in the open market for a total cost of approximately $0.4 million, or an average price of $9.36 per share.

We believe that our existing cash and cash equivalent balances will provide us sufficient funds to satisfy our cash requirements for at least the next 12 months.

We are exposed to the risk of changes in currency exchange rates. As of ~~April 30,~~July 31, 2007, we had no material accounts receivable denominated in foreign currencies. Our standard terms require customers to pay for our products and services in U.S. dollars. For those orders denominated in foreign currencies, we may limit our exposure to losses from foreign currency transactions through forward foreign exchange contracts. To date, sales denominated in foreign currencies have not been significant and we have not entered into any foreign exchange contracts.

The primary objective of our investment activities is to preserve principal while at the same time maximizing the income we receive from our investments without significantly increasing risk. Some of the securities that we have invested in may be subject to market risk. This means that a change in prevailing interest rates may cause the principal amount of the investment to fluctuate. For example, if we hold a security that was issued with a fixed interest rate at the then-prevailing rate and the prevailing interest rate later rises, the principal amount of our investment will probably decline in value. To minimize this risk, we maintain a significant portion of our cash balances in money market funds. In general, money market funds are not subject to interest rate risk because the interest paid on such funds fluctuates with the prevailing interest rate.

Our cash and cash equivalents have maturities dates of three months or less and the fair value approximates the carrying value in our financial statements.

Our short-term investments consist of balances maintained in a non-qualified deferred compensation plan funded by our executives and directors. We value these investments using the closing market value for the last day of each month. These investments are subject to market price volatility. We reflect these investments on our balance sheet at their market value, with the unrealized gains and losses reflected as adjustments to both short-term investments and the deferred compensation liability.

Due to the inherent risk associated with some of our investments, and in light of current stock market conditions, we may incur future losses on the sales, write-downs, or write-offs of our investments. We do not currently hedge against equity price changes.

We maintain disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the periodic reports that we file or submit with the SEC under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in the rules and forms of the SEC, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

Our management, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of the period covered by this report on Form 10-Q. Based upon this evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of the end of the period covered by this report on Form 10-Q.

We are from time to time involved in various legal proceedings incidental to the conduct of our business. We believe that the outcome of all such pending legal proceedings will not in the aggregate have a material adverse effect on our consolidated results of operations and financial position.

~~None.~~The following table shows shares repurchased during the six months ended July 31, 2007:

During 1992, the Company’s Board of Directors authorized a stock repurchase program of up to 3.0 million shares of the Company’s common stock. The program has no stated termination date. All of the repurchases were made pursuant to this program.

The shareholders also voted on and approved the ratification of the appointment of BDO Seidman, LLP as Comarco’s independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2008. The vote for the proposal was as follows:

On June 4, 2007 the Company’s Board of Directors formed an Executive Committee to augment the resources devoted to evaluating the Company’s strategic business and operational focus, improve its financial performance and lead the search for two additional independent directors. The Executive Committee will be chaired by independent director Erik H. van der Kaay and includes independent director Jeffrey R. Hultman and Thomas A. Franza, director and Chief Executive Officer of Comarco.None.

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this Report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.


		Page
PART I — FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1.	FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)

	Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of ~~April 30,~~July 31, 2007 and January 31, 2007	3

	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Three and Six Months Ended ~~April 30,~~July 31, 2007 and 2006	4

	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the ~~Three~~Six Months Ended ~~April 30,~~July 31, 2007 and 2006	5

	Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements	6

ITEM 2.	~~MANAGEMENT'S~~MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS	1719

ITEM 3.	QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK	3035

ITEM 4.	CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES	3136

PART II — OTHER INFORMATION

~~ITEM 1.~~	~~LEGAL PROCEEDINGS~~	32

ITEM 2.1.	LEGAL PROCEEDINGS	37

ITEM 2.	UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS	3237

ITEM 3.	DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES	3237

ITEM 4.	SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS	3237

ITEM 5.	OTHER INFORMATION	3238

ITEM 6.	EXHIBITS	~~EXHIBITS~~	3238

SIGNATURES		3339


	~~Year Ended~~ ~~January 31, 2007~~
~~Expected dividend yield~~	~~0.0~~	%
~~Expected volatility~~	~~44.2~~	%
~~Weighted average risk-free interest rate~~	~~4.8~~	%
~~Expected life (in years)~~	~~6.1~~
~~Expected forfeitures~~	~~10.6~~	%


	Six Months Ended July 31,
	2007		2006
Weighted average risk-free interest rate	4.8	%	4.8	%
Expected life (in years)	5.8		6.1
Expected stock volatility	40.1	%	44.2	%
Dividend yield	None		None
Expected forfeitures	10.6	%	10.6	%


	Mobile Power Products		Wireless Test Solutions		Call Box		Corporate		Total
Assets at July 31, 2007	$	1,809	$	7,358	$	4,341	$	22,188	$	35,696

Assets at January 31, 2007	$	4,615	$	10,861	$	8,181	$	27,756	$	51,413


	Three Months Ended April 30, 2006
	Mobile Power Products			Wireless Test Solutions			Call Box			Corporate		Total
Revenue	$	4,149		$	3,572		$	2,834		$	—	$	10,555
Cost of revenue		2,969			1,925			2,130			—		7,024

Gross profit	$	1,180		$	1,647		$	704		$	—	$	3,531

Gross margin		28.4	%		46.1	%		24.8	%		—		33.5	%

Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes	$	(128	)	$	(827	)	$	151		$	229	$	(575	)


	Mobile Power Products			Wireless Test Solutions			Call Box			Corporate		Total
Assets at April 30, 2007	$	1,197		$	9,051		$	5,418		$	23,198	$	38,864

Assets at January 31, 2007	$	4,615		$	10,861		$	8,181		$	27,756	$	51,413


	Three Months Ended July 31, 2006
	Mobile Power Products			Wireless Test Solutions			Call Box			Total
Revenue	$	4,517		$	3,710		$	4,745		$	12,972
Cost of revenue		3,393			1,576			3,277			8,246

Gross profit	$	1,124		$	2,134		$	1,468		$	4,726

Gross margin		24.9	%		57.5	%		30.9	%		36.4	%


	Six Months Ended July 31, 2006
	Mobile Power Products			Wireless Test Solutions			Call Box			Total
Revenue	$	8,666		$	7,283		$	7,579		$	23,528
Cost of revenue		6,363			3,501			5,407			15,271

Gross profit	$	2,303		$	3,782		$	2,172		$	8,257

Gross margin		26.6	%		51.9	%		28.7	%		35.1	%


Period	Total Number of Shares Purchased	Average Price Paid Per Share		Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs	Maximum Number of Shares that May Yet be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs
February 1 to February 28, 2007	12,970	$	7.68	12,970	366,846
March 1 to March 31, 2007	—		—	—	366,846
April 1 to April 30, 2007	—		—	—	366,846
May 1 to May 31, 2007	44,667	$	6.41	44,667	322,179
June 1 to June 30, 2007	—		—	—	322,179
July 1 to July 31, 2007	—		—	—	322,179

	57,637	$	6.70	57,637	322,179


	For	Withheld
Don M. Bailey	5,776,129	565,781
Thomas A. Franza	5,792,504	549,406
Gerald D. Griffin	5,870,267	471,643
Jeffrey R. Hultman	5,870,267	471,643
Erik H. van der Kaay	5,868,167	473,743


31.1		Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

31.2		Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

32.1		Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

32.2		Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


				COMARCO, INC.

Date: ~~June 14,~~September 13, 2007				/s/ Thomas A. Franza
				Thomas A. Franza
				President and Chief Executive Officer

Date: ~~June 14,~~September 13, 2007				/s/ Daniel R. Lutz
				Daniel R. Lutz
				Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer