UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

Form 10-Q

 

 xQUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended JuneSeptember 30, 2009

or

 

 ¨TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Commission file number: 1-6686

THE INTERPUBLIC GROUP OF COMPANIES, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

 

Delaware 13-1024020

(State or other jurisdiction of


incorporation or organization)

 

(I.R.S. Employer


Identification No.)

1114 Avenue of the Americas, New York, New York 10036

(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)

(212) 704-1200

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Yesx    No¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).

Yesx¨    No¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definition of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

 

Large accelerated filerx xAccelerated filer¨

Non-accelerated filer

¨

Smaller reporting company¨
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

  Smaller reporting company¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

Yes¨    Nox

The number of shares of the registrant’s common stock outstanding as of July 17,October 16, 2009 was 486,111,579.486,118,123.

 

 

 


INDEX

 

    Page No.

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements (Unaudited) 
 

Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Three and SixNine Months Ended JuneSeptember 30, 2009 and 2008

2

Consolidated Balance Sheets as of September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008

 3
 

Consolidated Balance Sheets asStatements of JuneCash Flows for the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008

 4
 

Consolidated Statements of Cash FlowsStockholders’ Equity and Comprehensive Income for the SixNine  Months Ended JuneSeptember 30, 2009 and 2008

 5
 

Consolidated Statement of Stockholders’ Equity and Comprehensive Income for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2009 and 2008

6

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

 87
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations 2423
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk 3940
Item 4. Controls and Procedures 3940

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings 4041
Item 1A. Risk Factors 4041
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds40
Item 4.Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders 41
Item 6. Exhibits 42

SIGNATURES

 43

INDEX TO EXHIBITS

 44

INFORMATION REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING DISCLOSURE

This quarterly report on Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements. Statements in this report that are not historical facts, including statements about management’s beliefs and expectations, constitute forward-looking statements. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, words such as “may,” “will,” “expect,” “believe,” ”anticipate,“anticipate,” “intend,” “could,” “would,” “estimate,” “continue” or comparable terminology are intended to identify forward-looking statements. These statements are based on current plans, estimates and projections, and are subject to change based on a number of factors, including those outlined under Item 1A, Risk Factors, in our most recent annual report on Form 10-K. Forward-looking statements speak only as of the date they are made, and we undertake no obligation to update publicly any of them in light of new information or future events.

Forward-looking statements involve inherent risks and uncertainties. A number of important factors could cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in any forward-looking statement. Such factors include, but are not limited to, the following:

 

potential effects of a challenging economy, for example, on the demand for our advertising and marketing services, on our clients’ financial condition and on our business or financial condition;

 

our ability to attract new clients and retain existing clients;

 

our ability to retain and attract key employees;

 

risks associated with assumptions we make in connection with our critical accounting estimates, including changes in assumptions associated with any effects of a weakened economy;

 

potential adverse effects if we are required to recognize impairment charges or other adverse accounting-related developments;


risks associated with the effects of global, national and regional economic and political conditions, including counterparty risks and fluctuations in economic growth rates, interest rates and currency exchange rates; and

 

developments from changes in the regulatory and legal environment for advertising and marketing and communications services companies around the world.

Investors should carefully consider these factors and the additional risk factors outlined in more detail under Item 1A, Risk Factors, in our most recent annual report on Form 10-K.


Part I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION

 

Item 1.Financial Statements (Unaudited)

THE INTERPUBLIC GROUP OF COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(Amounts in Millions, Except Per Share Amounts)

(Unaudited)

 

 Three months ended
June 30,
 Six months ended
June 30,
   Three months ended
September 30,
 Nine months ended
September 30,
 
 2009 2008 2009 2008   2009 2008 2009 2008 

REVENUE

 $1,474.4   $1,835.7   $2,799.7   $3,320.9    $1,426.7   $1,740.0   $4,226.4   $5,060.9  
                         

OPERATING EXPENSES:

         

Salaries and related expenses

  968.4    1,103.2    1,964.9    2,168.0     943.5    1,093.5    2,908.4    3,261.5  

Office and general expenses

  409.1    527.8    820.0    1,002.8     425.4    526.3    1,245.4    1,529.1  

Restructuring and other reorganization-related charges (reversals)

  —      4.1    (0.2  7.3  

Restructuring and other reorganization-related (reversals) charges

   (0.5  3.9    (0.7  11.2  
                         

Total operating expenses

  1,377.5    1,635.1    2,784.7    3,178.1     1,368.4    1,623.7    4,153.1    4,801.8  
                         

OPERATING INCOME

  96.9    200.6    15.0    142.8     58.3    116.3    73.3    259.1  
                         

EXPENSES AND OTHER INCOME:

         

Interest expense

  (45.1  (53.0  (79.9  (110.7   (37.8  (53.2  (117.7  (163.9

Interest income

  8.1    23.0    20.4    51.7     7.6    23.3    28.0    75.0  

Other (expense) income, net

  (23.3  6.3    (18.4  4.9  

Other income (expense), net

   1.0    (1.0  (17.4  3.9  
                         

Total (expenses) and other income

  (60.3  (23.7  (77.9  (54.1   (29.2  (30.9  (107.1  (85.0
                         

Income (loss) before income taxes

  36.6    176.9    (62.9  88.7     29.1    85.4    (33.8  174.1  

Provision for (benefit of) income taxes

  3.7    79.1    (21.7  55.4     3.7    35.5    (18.0  90.9  
                         

Income (loss) of consolidated companies

  32.9    97.8    (41.2  33.3     25.4    49.9    (15.8  83.2  

Equity in net (loss) income of unconsolidated affiliates

  (1.5  0.5    (1.0  1.6  

Equity in net income (loss) of unconsolidated affiliates

   0.5    0.5    (0.5  2.1  
                         

NET INCOME (LOSS)

  31.4    98.3    (42.2  34.9     25.9    50.4    (16.3  85.3  

Net (income) loss attributable to noncontrolling interests

  (3.6  (3.2  3.0    (2.6   (1.8  (4.7  1.2    (7.3
                         

NET INCOME (LOSS) ATTRIBUTABLE TO IPG

  27.8    95.1    (39.2  32.3     24.1    45.7    (15.1  78.0  

Dividends on preferred stock

  (6.9  (6.9  (13.8  (13.8   (6.9  (6.9  (20.7  (20.7

Allocation to participating securities

  —      (0.1  —      (0.3       (0.1      (0.6
                         

NET INCOME (LOSS) AVAILABLE TO IPG COMMON STOCKHOLDERS

 $20.9   $88.1   $(53.0 $18.2    $17.2   $38.7   $(35.8 $56.7  
                         

Earnings (loss) per share available to IPG common stockholders:

         

Basic

 $0.04   $0.19   $(0.11 $0.04    $0.04   $0.08   $(0.08 $0.12  

Diluted

 $0.04   $0.17   $(0.11 $0.04    $0.03   $0.08   $(0.08 $0.12  

Weighted-average number of common shares outstanding:

         

Basic

  467.1    460.5    465.6    459.9     470.5    462.8    467.3    460.8  

Diluted

  507.5    516.0    465.6    498.3     513.8    519.4    467.3    499.9  

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited financial statements.

THE INTERPUBLIC GROUP OF COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(Amounts in Millions)

(Unaudited)

 

  June 30,
2009
 December 31,
2008
   September 30,
2009
 December 31,
2008
 

ASSETS:

      

Cash and cash equivalents

  $1,760.5   $2,107.2    $1,761.5   $2,107.2  

Marketable securities

   10.9    167.7     10.6    167.7  

Accounts receivable, net of allowance of $63.8 and $63.9

   3,205.4    3,746.5  

Accounts receivable, net of allowance of $65.0 and $63.9

   3,067.7    3,746.5  

Expenditures billable to clients

   1,021.9    1,099.5     1,135.1    1,099.5  

Other current assets

   355.7    366.7     307.3    366.7  
              

Total current assets

   6,354.4    7,487.6     6,282.2    7,487.6  

Furniture, equipment and leasehold improvements, net of accumulated
depreciation of $1,109.5 and $1,055.8

   521.8    561.5  

Furniture, equipment and leasehold improvements, net of accumulated depreciation of
$1,145.3 and $1,055.8

   503.2    561.5  

Deferred income taxes

   447.3    416.8     438.9    416.8  

Goodwill

   3,298.0    3,220.9     3,310.2    3,220.9  

Other assets

   443.6    438.4     443.8    438.4  
              

TOTAL ASSETS

  $11,065.1   $12,125.2    $10,978.3   $12,125.2  
       
       

LIABILITIES:

      

Accounts payable

  $3,380.4   $4,022.6    $3,283.5   $4,022.6  

Accrued liabilities

   2,204.8    2,521.6     2,230.8    2,521.6  

Short-term debt

   137.3    332.8     88.2    332.8  
              

Total current liabilities

   5,722.5    6,877.0     5,602.5    6,877.0  

Long-term debt

   1,901.1    1,786.9     1,866.9    1,786.9  

Deferred compensation and employee benefits

   551.3    549.8     559.4    549.8  

Other non-current liabilities

   367.4    378.9     333.7    378.9  
              

TOTAL LIABILITIES

   8,542.3    9,592.6     8,362.5    9,592.6  
              

Redeemable noncontrolling interests (see Note 4)

   262.8    288.4  

Redeemable noncontrolling interests (see Note 5)

   262.4    288.4  

STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY:

      

Preferred stock

   525.0    525.0     525.0    525.0  

Common stock

   47.0    46.4     47.0    46.4  

Additional paid-in capital

   2,416.8    2,413.5     2,424.5    2,413.5  

Accumulated deficit

   (485.3  (446.1   (461.2  (446.1

Accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of tax

   (263.9  (318.5   (199.4  (318.5
              
   2,239.6    2,220.3     2,335.9    2,220.3  

Less: Treasury stock

   (14.0  (14.0   (14.0  (14.0
              

Total IPG stockholders’ equity

   2,225.6    2,206.3     2,321.9    2,206.3  

Noncontrolling interests

   34.4    37.9     31.5    37.9  
              

TOTAL STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

   2,260.0    2,244.2     2,353.4    2,244.2  
              

TOTAL LIABILITIES AND EQUITY

  $11,065.1   $12,125.2    $10,978.3   $12,125.2  
              

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited financial statements.

THE INTERPUBLIC GROUP OF COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(Amounts in Millions)

(Unaudited)

 

  Six months ended
June 30,
   Nine months ended
September 30,
 
  2009 2008   2009 2008 

CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:

      

Net (loss) income

  $(42.2 $34.9    $(16.3 $85.3  

Adjustments to reconcile net (loss) income to net cash (used in) provided by operating activities:

      

Depreciation and amortization of fixed assets and intangible assets

   84.5    86.3     126.5    130.5  

Provision for (reversal of) bad debt

   8.6    (0.4

Provision for bad debt

   13.6    6.3  

Amortization of restricted stock and other non-cash compensation

   24.8    43.0     37.7    64.4  

Amortization of bond discounts and deferred financing costs

   13.8    13.7     13.0    21.1  

Loss on early extinguishment of debt

   24.6    —       25.8      

Deferred income tax benefit

   (27.1  (5.6

Deferred income tax (benefit) provision

   (9.4  3.9  

Other

   6.8    6.7     9.8    6.9  

Changes in assets and liabilities, net of acquisitions and dispositions, providing (using) cash:

      

Accounts receivable

   602.3    347.3     812.9    465.4  

Expenditures billable to clients

   79.2    (100.8   (18.8  (205.2

Prepaid expenses and other current assets

   (7.2  (29.6   14.2    (14.1

Accounts payable

   (710.0  (98.5   (863.4  (325.2

Accrued liabilities

   (337.5  (176.0   (272.1  (80.1

Other non-current assets and liabilities

   (44.0  (9.1   (72.0  (13.1
              

Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities

   (323.4  111.9     (198.5  146.1  
              

CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:

      

Net sales and maturities (purchases) of short-term marketable securities

   157.9    (3.6

Acquisitions, including deferred payments, net of cash acquired

   (32.2  (26.3   (71.2  (101.0

Capital expenditures

   (27.7  (58.8   (43.7  (82.8

Net sales and maturities (purchases) of short-term marketable securities

   157.4    (3.1

Other investing activities

   (0.8  3.5     4.3    (10.9
              

Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities

   96.7    (84.7   47.3    (198.3
              

CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:

      

Purchase of long-term debt

   (770.7  (190.8

Proceeds from issuance of 10.0% Senior Notes due 2017

   587.7    —       587.7      

Purchase of long-term debt

   (698.3  (190.8

Issuance costs

   (15.8  (0.8   (19.2  (11.0

Net increase (decrease) in short-term bank borrowings

   13.8    (18.4

Net decrease in short-term bank borrowings

   (12.1  (23.3

Distributions to noncontrolling interests

   (17.4  (7.9   (21.1  (10.3

Preferred stock dividends

   (13.8  (13.8   (20.7  (20.7

Other financing activities

   (6.2  (7.3   (6.5  (7.0
              

Net cash used in financing activities

   (150.0  (239.0   (262.6  (263.1
              

Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents

   30.0    27.9  

Effect of foreign exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents

   68.1    (9.8
              

Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents

   (346.7  (183.9   (345.7  (325.1

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year

   2,107.2    2,014.9  

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period

   2,107.2    2,014.9  
              

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period

  $1,760.5   $1,831.0    $1,761.5   $1,689.8  
              

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited financial statements.

THE INTERPUBLIC GROUP OF COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

(Amounts in Millions)

(Unaudited)

 

 Common Stock Preferred
Stock
 Additional
Paid-in
Capital
  Accumulated
Deficit
  Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
(Loss) Income
  Treasury
Stock
  Total IPG
Stockholders’
Equity
  NCI  Total
Stockholders’
Equity
  Preferred
Stock
 Common Stock Additional
Paid-in
Capital
  Accumulated
Deficit
  Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Loss
  Treasury
Stock
  Total IPG
Stockholders’
Equity
  Noncontrolling
Interests
  Total
Stockholders’
Equity
 
 Shares Amount  Shares Amount 

Balance at December 31, 2008

 477.1 $46.4 $525.0 $2,413.5   $(446.1 $(318.5 $(14.0 $2,206.3   $37.9   $2,244.2   $525.0 477.1 $46.4 $2,413.5   $(446.1 $(318.5 $(14.0 $2,206.3   $37.9   $2,244.2  

Comprehensive income:

                    

Net loss

      (39.2    (39.2  (3.0  (42.2      (15.1    (15.1  (1.2  (16.3

Foreign currency translation adjustment, net of tax

       47.6     47.6    1.5    49.1         109.0     109.0    2.7    111.7  

Changes in market value of securities available-for-sale, net of tax

       1.1     1.1     1.1         0.6     0.6     0.6  

Recognition of previously unrealized loss on securities available-for-sale, net of tax

       (0.3   (0.3   (0.3                   

Unrecognized losses, transition obligation and prior service cost, net of tax

       6.2     6.2     6.2         9.5     9.5     9.5  
                                

Total comprehensive income

        $15.4   $(1.5 $13.9          $104.0   $1.5   $105.5  
                                

Reclassifications to redeemable noncontrolling interests

          15.6    15.6            12.1    12.1  

Noncontrolling interest transactions

     (4.1     (4.1  (0.9  (5.0     (5.4     (5.4  0.3    (5.1

Distributions to noncontrolling interests

          (17.4  (17.4          (21.1  (21.1

Change in redemption value of redeemable noncontrolling interests

     10.0       10.0     10.0       12.8       12.8     12.8  

Preferred stock dividends

     (13.8     (13.8   (13.8     (20.7     (20.7   (20.7

Stock-based compensation

     25.2       25.2     25.2       38.4       38.4     38.4  

Restricted stock, net of forfeitures

 9.1  0.6   (15.9     (15.3   (15.3  9.0  0.6  (17.4     (16.8   (16.8

Other

 0.3    1.9       1.9    0.7    2.6    0.4   3.3       3.3    0.8    4.1  
                                                      

Balance at June 30, 2009

 486.5 $47.0 $525.0 $2,416.8   $(485.3 $(263.9 $(14.0 $2,225.6   $34.4   $2,260.0  

Balance at September 30, 2009

 $525.0 486.5 $47.0 $2,424.5   $(461.2 $(199.4 $(14.0 $2,321.9   $31.5   $2,353.4  
                                                      

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited financial statements.

THE INTERPUBLIC GROUP OF COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME – (CONTINUED)

(Amounts in Millions)

(Unaudited)

 

 Common Stock Preferred
Stock
 Additional
Paid-in
Capital
  Accumulated
Deficit
  Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
(Loss) Income
  Treasury
Stock
  Total IPG
Stockholders’
Equity
  NCI  Total
Stockholders’
Equity
  Preferred
Stock
 Common Stock Additional
Paid-in
Capital
  Accumulated
Deficit
  Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Loss
  Treasury
Stock
  Total IPG
Stockholders’
Equity
  Noncontrolling
Interests
  Total
Stockholders’
Equity
 
 Shares Amount  Shares Amount 

Balance at December 31, 2007

 471.7 $45.9 $525.0 $2,541.2   $(741.1 $(118.6 $(14.0 $2,238.4   $36.7   $2,275.1   $525.0 471.7 $45.9 $2,541.2   $(741.1 $(118.6 $(14.0 $2,238.4   $36.7   $2,275.1  

Comprehensive income:

                    

Net income

      32.3      32.3    2.6    34.9        78.0      78.0    7.3    85.3  

Foreign currency translation adjustment, net of tax

       39.8     39.8    —      39.8         (37.5   (37.5  (0.9  (38.4

Changes in market value of securities available-for-sale, net of tax

       (1.3   (1.3   (1.3       (2.5   (2.5   (2.5

Recognition of previously unrealized loss on securities available-for-sale, net of tax

       (0.5   (0.5   (0.5

Unrecognized gains, transition obligation and prior service cost, net of tax

       (1.8   (1.8   (1.8

Recognition of previously unrealized gains on securities available-for-sale, net of tax

       (0.4   (0.4   (0.4

Unrecognized losses, transition obligation and prior service cost, net of tax

       3.0     3.0     3.0  
                                

Total comprehensive income

        $68.5   $2.6   $71.1          $40.6   $6.4   $47.0  
                
                

Reclassifications to redeemable noncontrolling interests

          2.3    2.3            (6.9  (6.9

Noncontrolling interest transactions

          (0.1  (0.1          7.6    7.6  

Distributions to noncontrolling interests

          (7.9  (7.9          (10.3  (10.3

Change in redemption value of redeemable noncontrolling interests

     1.2       1.2     1.2       (170.9     (170.9   (170.9

Preferred stock dividends

     (13.8     (13.8   (13.8     (20.7     (20.7   (20.7

Stock-based compensation

     43.5       43.5     43.5       65.2       65.2     65.2  

Restricted stock, net of forfeitures

 5.0  0.4   (10.5     (10.1   (10.1  5.0  0.4  (11.2     (10.8   (10.8

Other

 0.2    2.3       2.3    (0.4  1.9    0.4  0.1  4.6       4.7    (0.4  4.3  
                                                      

Balance at June 30, 2008

 476.9 $46.3 $525.0 $2,563.9   $(708.8 $(82.4 $(14.0 $2,330.0   $33.2   $2,363.2  

Balance at September 30, 2008

 $525.0 477.1 $46.4 $2,408.2   $(663.1 $(156.0 $(14.0 $2,146.5   $33.1   $2,179.6  
                                                      

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited financial statements.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(Amounts in Millions, Except Per Share Amounts)

(Unaudited)

Note 1:  Basis of Presentation

The unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements have been prepared by The Interpublic Group of Companies, Inc. (together with its subsidiaries, the “Company,” “Interpublic,” “we,” “us” or “our”) in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC” or the “Commission”) for reporting interim financial information on Form 10-Q. Accordingly, they do not include certain information and disclosures required for complete financial statements. The preparation of financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires us to make judgments, assumptions and estimates that affect the amounts reported and disclosed. Actual results could differ from those estimates. The consolidated results for interim periods are not necessarily indicative of results for the full year and should be read in conjunction with our 2008 Annual Report on Form 10-K as filed on February 27, 2009 and the revisions made on Form 8-K dated as of June 8, 2009.

In the opinion of management, these unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements include all adjustments of a normal and recurring nature necessary for a fair statement of the information for each period contained therein. We have evaluated subsequent events through the filing of this Form 10-Q on October 28, 2009 with the SEC, and determined there have not been any events that have occurred that would require adjustments to our unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements. Certain reclassifications have been made to prior periods to conform to the current period presentation.

Note 2:  Debt and Credit Arrangements

Long-Term Debt

A summary of the carrying amounts and fair values of our long-term debt is as follows.

 

  Effective
Interest
Rate
  June 30,
2009
  December 31,
2008
 September 30,
2009
 December 31,
2008
 Book
Value
  Fair
Value 3
  Book
Value
  Fair
Value 3
 Effective
Interest
Rate
 Book
Value
 Fair
Value2
 Book
Value
 Fair
Value2

5.40% Senior Unsecured Notes due 2009

  5.43 $36.0  $36.4  $249.9  $230.0 5.43 $ $ $249.9 $230.0

Floating Rate Senior Unsecured Notes due 2010
(less unamortized discount of $3.6)

  8.65  246.4   235.0   245.1   225.0

Floating Rate Senior Unsecured Notes due 2010 (less unamortized discount of $2.5)

 8.65  211.2  206.2  245.1  225.0

7.25% Senior Unsecured Notes due 2011

  7.25%1   36.4   37.8   501.8   315.0 7.251   36.4  36.5  501.8  315.0

6.25% Senior Unsecured Notes due 2014
(less unamortized discount of $0.6)

  6.29%1   350.2   301.0   350.2   185.5

10.00% Senior Unsecured Notes due 2017
(less unamortized discount of $12.2)

  10.38  587.8   609.0   —     —  

4.75% Convertible Senior Notes due 2023
(plus unamortized premium of $8.3)

  3.50  208.3   189.7   209.5   137.4

6.25% Senior Unsecured Notes due 2014 (less unamortized discount of $0.5)

 6.291   354.9  329.0  350.2  185.5

10.00% Senior Unsecured Notes due 2017 (less unamortized discount of $12.0)

 10.38  588.0  645.0    

4.75% Convertible Senior Notes due 2023 (plus unamortized premium of $7.8)

 3.50  207.8  214.1  209.5  137.4

4.50% Convertible Senior Notes due 2023

  4.50  8.7   7.9   8.7   5.7 4.50  8.7  8.6  8.7  5.7

4.25% Convertible Senior Notes due 2023
(plus unamortized premium of $39.1)

  0.58  439.1   380.7   446.3   288.0

4.25% Convertible Senior Notes due 2023 (plus unamortized premium of $35.5)

 0.58  435.5  418.1  446.3  288.0

Other notes payable and capitalized leases

    27.6     29.4     27.6   29.4 
                  

Total long-term debt

    1,940.5     2,040.9     1,870.1   2,040.9 

Less: Current portion 2

    39.4     254.0  

Less: Current portion

   3.2   254.0 
                  

Long-term debt, excluding current portion

   $1,901.1    $1,786.9    $1,866.9  $1,786.9 
                  

 

1Excludes the effect of related gains/losses on interest rate swaps.
2On November 15, 2009 our 5.40% Senior Unsecured Notes mature, so we have included these Notes in short-term debt on our June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008 Consolidated Balance Sheets.
3In accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Staff Position FAS 107-1 and Accounting Principles Board (“APB”) 28-1,Interim Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments,we have provided the fair value of our long-term debt. Fair values are derived from trading quotes by institutions making a market in the securities and estimations of value by those institutions using proprietary models.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements – (continued)

(Amounts in Millions, Except Per Share Amounts)

(Unaudited)

Senior Notes due 2017

On June 15, 2009 we issued $600.0 in aggregate principal amount of 10.00% Senior Unsecured Notes due 2017 (the “2017 Notes”) at 97.958% of par through a private placement. As a result, the 2017 Notes were reflected on our unaudited Consolidated Balance Sheet at their fair value at issuance, or $587.7. The discount of $12.3 will be amortized through the

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements – (continued)

(Amounts in Millions, Except Per Share Amounts)

(Unaudited)

maturity date, July 15, 2017, using the effective interest method. Interest is payable semi-annually in arrears on January 15th and July 15th of each year, commencing on January 15, 2010. Capitalized direct fees of $15.7$15.8 related to the issuance of the 2017 Notes will be amortized in interest expense through the maturity date. Consistent with our other debt securities, the 2017 Notes include covenants that, among other things, limit our liens and the liens of our consolidated subsidiaries, but do not require us to maintain any financial ratios or specified levels of net worth or liquidity.

We used the proceeds of the 2017 Notes primarily to fund our tender offers, described below, to purchase outstanding 7.25% Notes due 2011 (the “2011 Notes”) and Floating Rate Notes due 2010 (the “2010 Notes”). Excess funds raised in the offering but not used in the tender offers can be used for the repayment, repurchase or redemption of other indebtedness, general corporate purposes and working capital.

At any time prior to July 15, 2013, we may, at our option, redeem all or some of the 2017 Notes at their principal amount plus a make-whole premium and accrued and unpaid interest. At any time on or after July 15, 2013, we may, at our option, redeem the 2017 Notes, in whole or in part, at the following redemption prices, expressed as a percentage of principal amount, set forth below, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if redeemed during the twelve monthtwelve-month period beginning on July 15th of the years indicated below.

 

Year

  

Percentage of
Principal

 

2013

  105.00

2014

  102.50

2015 and thereafter

  100.00

If we have a change of control event, each holder of the 2017 Notes will have the right to require us to repurchase all or any part of that holder’s notes. We will offer payment innotes for cash equal to 101.00% of the aggregate principal amount of the 2017 Notes repurchased plus accrued and unpaid interest to the date of repurchase.

On October 26, 2009, we exchanged $600.0 principal amount of the 2017 Notes for an equal amount of new 2017 Notes with substantially identical terms as the original notes, except the new notes have no transfer restrictions under the federal securities laws. Completion of the exchange offer will not affect any of the financial terms of the outstanding 2017 Notes.

Tender Offers

On June 8, 2009, we launched tender offers to purchase, for cash, (i) any and all of our $250.0 5.40% Notes due 2009 (the “2009 Notes”) and (ii) up to $500.0 in aggregate principal amount of our outstanding 2011 Notes and 2010 Notes with an early tender date of June 19, 2009 and an expiration date of July 6, 2009. We used the proceeds from the offering of the 2017 Notes first to purchase tendered 2011 Notes, and then to purchase on a pro-rated basis tendered 2010 Notes. We used cash on hand to purchase the tendered 2009 Notes. The tendered notes that were accepted for purchase received accrued and unpaid interest to, but not including, the settlement date. The purchase price for our tendered notes per $1,000 aggregate principal amount in whole dollars is listed below.

 

   Early Tender Price 1  Tender Offer Price

2009 Notes

  $1,010  $980

2011 Notes

  $1,040  $1,010

2010 Notes

  $1,000  $970

 

1Includes an early tender premium of $30 per $1,000 principal amount of notes paid only to holders that validly tendered such notes during the early tender period that were accepted for purchase. Holders of notes tendered after the early tender period but before the end of the tender period did not receive the early tender premium.

On June 22, 2009, we settled early tenders of the 2009 Notes and the 2011 Notes. We purchased $213.9 aggregate principal amount of the 2009 Notes and $463.7 aggregate principal amount of the 2011 Notes. Cash paid to purchase the

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements – (continued)

(Amounts in Millions, Except Per Share Amounts)

(Unaudited)

2009 Notes and 2011 Notes that were tendered during the early tender period, including accrued and unpaid interest, was $711.4. The 2010 Notes tendered during the early tender period that were accepted for purchase received the early tender

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements – (continued)

(Amounts in Millions, Except Per Share Amounts)

(Unaudited)

price; they were not, however, considered for purchase until the final settlement date. Holders who did not tender the 2009 Notes, 2011 Notes or 2010 Notes during the early tender period were able to tender their notes before the expiration of the tender period on July 6, 2009, but did not receive an early tender premium.

In accordance with Statementauthoritative guidance regarding the extinguishment of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 140,Accounting for Transfersliabilities and Servicing of Financial Assetsdebt modifications and Extinguishment of Liabilitiesand APB Opinion No. 26,Early Extinguishment of Debt,extinguishments, the settlement of our tender offers werewas treated as a debt extinguishment because we were relieved of our debt obligation upon settlement. We compared the proportionate share of the net carrying amount, which includes the carrying amount due at maturity, adjusted for unamortized discounts, debt issuance costs and gains and losses on interest rate swaps, if applicable, to the reacquisition price for each of the tendered 2009 Notes and 2011 Notes. Since the reacquisition price was greater than the net carrying amount for the 2009 Notes and the 2011 Notes, we recorded a charge of $24.6 reflected in other income (expense) income,, net in the unaudited Consolidated Statement of Operations during the second quarter of 2009.

Subsequent to June 30, 2009

On July 7, 2009, we settled tenders for the 2009 Notes, 2011 Notes and 2010 Notes that had not been settled at the early settlement date. We purchased less than $0.1 aggregate principal amount of the 2009 Notes and 2011 Notes, as well as $36.3 aggregate principal amount of the 2010 Notes. Cash paid to purchase the 2009 Notes, 2011 Notes and 2010 Notes that were purchased at the end of the final tender period, including accrued and unpaid interest, was $36.5. As a result of the final settlement of our tender offers, we will recordrecorded a debt extinguishment charge of approximately $0.8$0.9 reflected in other income (expense) income,, net in the unaudited Consolidated Statement of Operations during the third quarter of 2009.

Redemption

On September 14, 2009, we redeemed all of our 2009 Notes that remained outstanding and that were scheduled to mature on November 15, 2009. Cash paid to redeem the $36.0 aggregate principal amount of the 2009 Notes, including accrued and unpaid interest, was $37.0. As a result of the redemption, we recorded a debt extinguishment charge of $0.3 reflected in other income (expense), net in the unaudited Consolidated Statement of Operations during the third quarter of 2009.

Interest Rate Swaps

In July and August of 2009, we entered into a series of interest rate swap agreements related to our 6.25% Senior Unsecured Notes due 2014 (the “6.25% Notes”). These swap agreements economically to convert $100.0$250.0 notional amount of our $350.0 6.25% Notes from fixed rate to floating rate debt. We enter into interest rate swaps for risk management purposes, and not for speculative purposes, to manage our exposure to changes in interest rates and to maintain an appropriate mix of fixed and floating rate debt. The interest rate swap agreements became effective July 16 and July 21, 2009 and have a maturity ofmature on November 15, 2014, coinciding with the maturity of the 6.25% Notes. We pay a variable interest rate based upon the three-month U.S. LIBOR rate plus a fixed spread and receive a fixed interest rate of 6.25%. The variable interest rate is reset quarterly, and we make our interest payments quarterly on February 15th,15th, May 15th,15th, August 15th15th and November 15th.15th. We receive fixed payments semi-annually on May 15th15th and November 15th. We account for the15th. The interest rate swap agreements have qualified for hedge accounting as a fair value hedge, and we will continue to evaluate these agreements for the appropriateness of hedge accounting throughout the hedge period. We recognize the changes in the fair value of the swap should offsetas well as the changes in the fair value of the $100.0 fixed-rateunderlying debt attributable toin interest expense. As of September 30, 2009, the change in the three-month U.S. LIBOR rate. At inception, the interest ratefinancial statement impact of these swap agreements met the criteria for the short-cut method under SFAS No. 133,Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, and thus will have no impact on ourwas negligible.

Notes to Consolidated Balance Sheet.Financial Statements – (continued)

(Amounts in Millions, Except Per Share Amounts)

(Unaudited)

Credit Arrangements

A summary of our credit facilities is listed below.

 

  June 30, 2009  December 31, 2008 September 30, 2009 December 31, 2008
  Total
Facility
  Amount
Outstanding
  Letters
of Credit
  Total
Available
  Total
Facility
  Amount
Outstanding
  Letters
of Credit
  Total
Available
 Total
Facility
 Amount
Outstanding
 Letters
of Credit
 Total
Available
 Total
Facility
 Amount
Outstanding
 Letters
of Credit
 Total
Available

Committed

                        

2006 Credit Agreement

  $—    $—    $—    $—    $750.0  $—    $128.1  $621.9 $ $ $ $ $750.0 $ $128.1 $621.9

2008 Credit Agreement

  $335.0  $—    $92.8  $242.2  $335.0  $—    $—    $335.0 $335.0 $ $94.1 $240.9 $335.0 $ $ $335.0

Uncommitted

                 $400.3 $85.0 $0.8 $314.5 $386.3 $78.8 $1.1 $306.4

Non-U.S.

  $400.0  $97.9  $0.8  $301.3  $386.3  $78.8  $1.1  $306.4

On June 15, 2009, our $750.0 Three-Year Credit Agreement, dated as of June 13, 2006 (the “2006 Credit Agreement”) expired. As of the expiration date, there was no outstanding principal, and the outstanding letters of credit were replaced with

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements – (continued)

(Amounts in Millions, Except Per Share Amounts)

(Unaudited)

letters of credit issued under our $335.0 Three-Year Credit Agreement, dated as of July 18, 2008 (the “2008 Credit Agreement”). In connection with the 2006 Credit Agreement we issued 67.9 warrants, consisting of 29.1 capped warrants (the “Capped Warrants”) and 38.8 uncapped warrants (the “Uncapped Warrants”) with a stated exercise date of June 15, 2009. We have elected that, should there be any settlement, eachFor the Capped Warrants, the exercise price was $9.89 per warrant, but the amount deliverable upon exercise was capped so a holder will be paid in cash.would not benefit from appreciation of the common stock above $12.36 per share. For the Uncapped Warrants, the exercise price was $11.91 per warrant. The amount to be paid, if any, will be based on the difference between the stated exercise price of the warrantcapped and uncapped warrants was greater than the market price of one share of our common stock calculated over a 30-trading-day period between June 18, 2009 and July 29, 2009. For the Capped Warrants, the exercise price is $9.89 per warrant, but the amount deliverable upon exercise is capped2009, so a holder willwe did not benefit from appreciation of thehave to make any cash payments or issue any common stock above $12.36 per share. Forto settle the Uncapped Warrants, the exercise price is $11.91 per warrant.capped or uncapped warrants.

On May 13, 2009, we entered into Amendment No. 1 to the 2008 Credit Agreement to preserve our ability to use the 2008 Credit Agreement in the event of any bankruptcy or related event with respect to General Motors Corporation (“GM”) and/or any of its affiliates. Amendment No. 1 modifies the definition of EBITDAearnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (“EBITDA”) under the 2008 Credit Agreement to exclude from the determination of consolidated EBITDA any effects arising from any bankruptcy or other adverse event with respect to GM and/or any of its affiliates, limited to an aggregate amount of $150.0 of cash charges and an aggregate amount of $100.0 of non-cash charges. On June 1, 2009, GM and certain of its U.S. affiliates filed voluntary petitions for relief under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code. We did not incur any cash or non-cash charges related to GM during the second quarter of 2009.

On June 5, 2009, we entered into Amendment No. 2 to the 2008 Credit Agreement to modify terms of the financial covenants. As of the end of each fiscal quarter, we will be required to maintain an (i) an interest coverage ratio (EBITDA to net interest expense plus cash dividends on convertible preferred stock) for the four quarters then ended of not less than 3.75 to 1, (ii) a leverage ratio (debt as of such date to EBITDA) for the four quarters then ended of not greater than 3.25 to 1, and (iii) minimum EBITDA for the four quarters then ended of not less than $550.0 through June 30, 2010 and not less than $600.0 thereafter. As of JuneSeptember 30, 2009, we were in compliance with all applicable covenants.

As of JuneSeptember 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, there were no borrowings under our committed credit facilities. However, there were borrowings under the uncommitted facilities made by several of our subsidiaries outside the U.S.international subsidiaries. We have guaranteed the repayment of some of these borrowings made by certain subsidiaries. The weighted-average interest rate on outstanding balances under the uncommitted short-term facilities as of JuneSeptember 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008 was approximately 1% and 3%, respectively.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements – (continued)

(Amounts in Millions, Except Per Share Amounts)

(Unaudited)

Note 3:  Earnings (Loss) Per Share

Earnings (loss) per basic common share available to IPG common stockholders equals net income (loss) available to IPG common stockholders divided by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the applicable period. Diluted earnings (loss) per share available to IPG common stockholders equals net income (loss) available to IPG common stockholders adjusted to exclude, if dilutive, preferred stock dividends, allocation to participating securities and interest expense related to potentially dilutive securities calculated using the effective interest rate, divided by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding, plus any additional common shares that would have been outstanding if potentially dilutive shares had been issued.

In periods when we generate income, we calculate basic earnings per share available to IPG common stockholders using the two-class method, pursuant to Emerging Issues Task Force (“EITF”) Issue No. 03-6,authoritative guidance for earnings per shareParticipating Securities and the Two-Class Method under SFAS Statement No. 128.. The two-class method is required as our 4.50% Convertible Senior Notes qualify as participating securities, having the right to receive dividends or dividend equivalents should dividends be declared on common stock. Under this method, earnings for the period (after deduction for contractual preferred stock dividends) are allocated on a pro-rata basis to the common stockholders and to the holders of participating securities based on their right to receive dividends. We do not use the two-class method in periods when we generate a loss as the holders of the 4.50% Convertible Senior Notes do not participate in losses.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements – (continued)

(Amounts in Millions, Except Per Share Amounts)

(Unaudited)

The two-class method could also be required for our redeemable noncontrolling interests, which have been reflected as “mezzanine equity” in the unaudited Consolidated Balance Sheets as a result of our adoption of EITF Topic No. D-98,“Classificationauthoritative guidance for classification and Measurementmeasurement of Redeemable Securities(“EITF D-98”).redeemable securities. Each reporting period, redeemable noncontrolling interests will be reported at their estimated redemption value, but not less than their initial fair value. Any adjustment to the redemption value will also impact additional paid-in capital, but will not impact net income (loss). Adjustments as a result of currency translation will affect the redeemable noncontrolling interest balance, but not additional paid-in capital. To the extent that the redemption value increases and exceeds the then currentthen-current fair value of a redeemable noncontrolling interest, net income (loss) available to IPG common stockholders (used to calculate earnings (loss) per share) could be reducednegatively impacted by that increase, subject to certain limitations. The partial or full recovery of these reductions to net income (loss) available to IPG common stockholders (used to calculate earnings (loss) per share) is limited to cumulative prior periodprior-period reductions.

   Three months ended
September 30,
  Nine months ended
September 30,
     2009      2008      2009      2008  

Net income (loss) available to IPG common stockholders – basic

  $17.2  $38.7  $(35.8 $56.7

Add: Effect of dilutive securities

       

Interest on 4.25% Convertible Senior Notes

   0.3   0.4       1.0

Interest on 4.75% Convertible Senior Notes

      1.0       
                

Net income (loss) available to IPG common stockholders – diluted

  $17.5  $40.1  $(35.8 $57.7
                
 

Weighted-average number of common shares outstanding – basic

   470.5   462.8   467.3    460.8

Effect of dilutive securities:

       

Restricted stock and stock options

   11.1   8.3       6.9

4.25% Convertible Senior Notes

   32.2   32.2       32.2

4.75% Convertible Senior Notes

      16.1       
                

Weighted-average number of common shares outstanding – diluted

   513.8   519.4   467.3    499.9
                
 

Earnings (loss) per share available to IPG common stockholders – basic

  $0.04  $0.08  $(0.08 $0.12

Earnings (loss) per share available to IPG common stockholders – diluted

  $0.03  $0.08  $(0.08 $0.12

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements – (continued)

(Amounts in Millions, Except Per Share Amounts)

(Unaudited)

 

   Three months ended
June 30,
  Six months ended
June 30,
     2009      2008      2009      2008  

Net income (loss) available to IPG common stockholders – basic

  $20.9  $88.1  $(53.0 $18.2

Add: Effect of dilutive securities

       

Interest on 4.25% Convertible Senior Notes

   0.4   0.4   —      0.7

Interest on 4.75% Convertible Senior Notes

   —     1.0   —      —  
                

Net income (loss) available to IPG common stockholders – diluted

  $21.3  $89.5  $(53.0 $18.9
                
 

Weighted-average number of common shares outstanding – basic

   467.1   460.5   465.6    459.9

Effect of dilutive securities:

       

Restricted stock and stock options

   8.2   7.2   —      6.2

4.25% Convertible Senior Notes

   32.2   32.2   —      32.2

4.75% Convertible Senior Notes

   —     16.1   —      —  
                

Weighted-average number of common shares outstanding – diluted

   507.5   516.0   465.6    498.3
                
 

Earnings (loss) per share available to IPG common stockholders – basic

  $0.04  $0.19  $(0.11 $0.04

Earnings (loss) per share available to IPG common stockholders – diluted

  $0.04  $0.17  $(0.11 $0.04

Basic and diluted shares outstanding and loss per share are equal for the sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2009 because our potentially dilutive securities are antidilutive as a result of the net loss available to IPG common stockholders. The following table presents the potential shares excluded from diluted earnings (loss) per share because the effect of including these potential shares would be antidilutive.

 

  Three months ended
June 30,
  Six months ended
June 30,
  Three months ended
September 30,
  Nine months ended
September 30,
      2009          2008          2009          2008        2009      2008      2009      2008  

Stock options and non-vested restricted stock awards

  —    —    7.0  —        7.7  

4.75% Convertible Senior Notes

  16.1  —    16.1  16.1  16.1    16.1  16.1

4.25% Convertible Senior Notes

  —    —    32.2  —        32.2  

4.50% Convertible Senior Notes

  0.7  0.7  0.7  7.1  0.7  0.7  0.7  5.0

Series B Preferred Stock

  38.4  38.4  38.4  38.4  38.4  38.4  38.4  38.4
                        

Total

  55.2  39.1  94.4  61.6  55.2  39.1  95.1  59.5
                        

Securities excluded from the diluted (loss) earnings per share calculation because the exercise price was greater than the average market price:

        

Securities excluded from the diluted earnings (loss) per share calculation because the exercise price was greater than the average market price:

        

Stock options1

  25.8  25.5  25.8  25.6  21.6  27.1  21.6  27.1

Warrants2

  67.9  67.9  67.9  67.9    67.9  67.9  67.9

 

1These options are outstanding at the end of the respective periods. In any period in which the exercise price is less than the average market price, these options have the potential to be dilutive and application of the treasury stock method would reduce this amount.
2The potential dilutive impact of the warrants is based upon the difference between the market price of one share of our common stock and the stated exercise prices of the warrants.warrants, adjusted to reflect the period during which the warrants were outstanding. See Note 2 for further discussion.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements – (continued)Note 4:  Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets

(AmountsThe deterioration of global economic conditions has adversely affected the demand for advertising and marketing services in Millions, Except Per Share Amounts)2009, which has presented a challenge in meeting the revenue and profit growth projections for certain of our reporting units. We determined that the projected decrease in profitability for 2009 of five of our reporting units was an event that “more likely than not” could reduce the fair value of each of these reporting units below its carrying value. We assessed the recoverability of goodwill at these five reporting units as of August 31, 2009 and determined in each case that the fair value was greater than the carrying value, and as such we did not have an impairment charge in the third quarter of 2009.

(Unaudited)

Note 4:5:  Supplementary Data

Accrued Liabilities

 

  June 30,
2009
  December 31,
2008
  September 30,
2009
  December 31,
2008

Media and production expenses

  $1,653.3  $1,708.3  $1,709.1  $1,708.3

Salaries, benefits and related expenses

   310.2   466.5   321.7   466.5

Office and related expenses

   55.7   69.6   53.4   69.6

Professional fees

   19.3   24.7   17.7   24.7

Restructuring and other reorganization-related

   4.9   10.0

Interest

   17.7   30.6   30.0   30.6

Acquisition obligations

   39.5   53.9   12.8   53.9

Other

   104.2   158.0   86.1   168.0
            

Total accrued liabilities

  $2,204.8  $2,521.6  $2,230.8  $2,521.6
            

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements – (continued)

(Amounts in Millions, Except Per Share Amounts)

(Unaudited)

2004 Restatement Liabilities

 

  June 30,
2009
  December 31,
2008
  September 30,
2009
  December 31,
2008

Vendor discounts and credits

  $124.4  $126.0  $121.0  $126.0

Internal investigations (includes asset reserves)

   2.5   2.2   2.6   2.2

International compensation arrangements

   4.6   5.8   4.0   5.8
            

Total 2004 restatement liabilities

  $131.5  $134.0  $127.6  $134.0
            

As part of the restatement we presented in our 2004 Restatement,Annual Report on Form 10-K (the “2004 Restatement”), we recognized liabilities related to vendor discounts and credits where we had a contractual or legal obligation to rebate such amounts to our clients or vendors. Reductions to these liabilities are achieved through settlements with clients and vendors, but also may occur if the applicable statute of limitations in a jurisdiction has lapsed. Also, as part of the 2004 Restatement, we recognized liabilities related to internal investigations and international compensation arrangements.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements – (continued)

(Amounts in Millions, Except Per Share Amounts)

(Unaudited)

Redeemable Noncontrolling Interests

Many of our acquisitions include provisions under which the noncontrolling equity owners can require us to purchase additional interests in a subsidiary at their discretion. Payments for these redeemable noncontrolling interests are contingent upon achieving projected operating performance targets and satisfying other conditions specified in the related agreements and are subject to revisions as the earn-out periods progress. As a result of revisions made to EITF D-98,the authoritative guidance for classification and measurement of redeemable securities, which isare effective for the Company January 1, 2009, we reflect these obligations for redeemable noncontrolling interests as “mezzanine equity” in the unaudited Consolidated Balance Sheets. The following table presents changes in redeemable noncontrolling interests presented in “mezzanine equity” in the unaudited Consolidated Balance Sheets.interests.

 

Balance as of December 31, 2007

  $101.2    $101.2  

Noncontrolling interest balance related to redeemable noncontrolling interests

   11.7     11.7  

Change in redemption value of redeemable noncontrolling interests:

  

Changes in redemption value of redeemable noncontrolling interests:

  

Redeemable noncontrolling interests related to current year transactions

   203.2     203.2  

Redemptions

   (17.1   (17.1

Redemption value adjustments 1

   (10.6   (10.6
        

Balance as of December 31, 2008

   288.4     288.4  
        

Noncontrolling interest balance related to redeemable noncontrolling interests

   (15.6   (12.1

Change in redemption value of redeemable noncontrolling interests:

  

Changes in redemption value of redeemable noncontrolling interests:

  

Redeemable noncontrolling interests related to current year transactions

   2.8     0.5  

Redemptions

   (2.9   (5.3

Redemption value adjustments 1

   (9.9   (9.1
        

Balance as of June 30, 2009

  $262.8  

Balance as of September 30, 2009

  $262.4  
        

 

1Redeemable noncontrolling interests are reported at their estimated redemption value in each reporting period, but not less than their initial fair value. Any adjustment to the redemption value impacts additional paid-in capital.capital, except adjustments as a result of currency translation.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements – (continued)

(Amounts in Millions, Except Per Share Amounts)

(Unaudited)

Other income (expense) income,, net

Results of operations for the three and sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2009 and 2008 include certain items which are either non-recurring or are not directly associated with our revenue producing operations.

 

   Three months ended
June 30,
  Six months ended
June 30,
 
       2009          2008          2009          2008     

Loss on early extinguishment of debt 1

  $(24.6 $—    $(24.6 $—    

(Losses) gains on sales of businesses and investments

   (2.8  3.1   (2.8  3.6  

Vendor discounts and credit adjustments 2

   4.7    3.2   6.2    10.3  

Litigation settlement3

   —      —     —      (12.0

Other (expense) income, net

   (0.6  —     2.8    3.0  
                 

Total other (expense) income, net

  $(23.3 $   6.3  $(18.4 $4.9  
                 
   Three months ended
September 30,
  Nine months ended
September 30,
 
     2009      2008      2009      2008   

Loss on early extinguishment of debt1

  $(1.2 $   $(25.8 $  

Gains (losses) on sales of businesses and investments

   0.7    (0.1  (2.1  3.9  

Vendor discounts and credit adjustments2

   1.5    2.4 ��  7.7    12.6  

Litigation settlement3

               (12.0

Other (expense) income, net

       (3.3  2.8    (0.6
                 

Total other income (expense), net

  $1.0   $(1.0 $(17.4 $3.9  
                 

 

1During the second quarter of 2009, we recorded a charge of $24.6 related to the settlement of our early tender offers for the 2009 Notes and 2011 Notes. During the third quarter of 2009, we recorded a charge of $0.9 related to the final settlement of our tender offers for the 2009 Notes, 2011 Notes and 2010 Notes, as well as a charge of $0.3 related to the redemption of all of our outstanding 2009 Notes. See Note 2 for further information.
2We are in the process of settling our liabilities related to vendor discounts and credits established during the 2004 Restatement. These adjustments reflect the reversal of certain of these liabilities as a result of settlements with clients or vendors or where the statute of limitations has lapsed.
3During May 2008, the SEC concluded its investigation that began in 2002 into our financial reporting practices, resulting in a settlement charge of $12.0, which was accrued in the first quarter of 2008.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements – (continued)

(Amounts in Millions, Except Per Share Amounts)

(Unaudited)

Note 5:6:  Income Taxes

For the three and sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2009, the difference between the effective tax rate and the statutory rate of 35% is primarily due to the recognition of previously unrecognized tax benefits, the recognition of tax benefits on partially worthless securities, losses in certain foreign locations where we receive no tax benefit due to 100% valuation allowances and the establishment of valuation allowances in the Asia Pacific region. For the nine months ended September 30, 2009, the difference between the effective tax rate and the statutory tax rate is also due to the write-off of deferred tax assets related to restricted stock.

ForIn August 2009, we finalized our proceeding with the three months ended June 30, 2009,IRS appeals division for the 2003-2004 audit cycle and our IRS examination for the 2005-2006 audit cycle. As a result, we recognized previously unrecognized tax benefits and related interest (net of federal benefit) of $23.4 related to the IRS appeals settlement regarding items of income and expense attributable to the 2004 Restatement.$26.8. The $23.4$26.8 includes a decrease of $14.4 of$23.3 in gross unrecognized tax benefits resulting from tax positions taken in prior periods and a decrease of $15.1 of$5.4 in gross interest on unrecognized tax benefits. Nearly offsetting this amount was the establishment of valuation allowances in the Asia Pacific region, where we determined it was more likely than not a deferred tax asset will not be realized.

In May 2009, we finalized our proceeding with the IRS appeals division for the 1997-2002 IRS audit cycle. As a result, we recognized previously unrecognized tax benefits and related interest (net of this wefederal benefit) of $23.4 and received a cash refund of approximately $27.0 in July. We expect to complete our discussions with the IRS appeals division regarding the years 2003 and 2004 by the end of the current year.July 2009.

In December 2007, the IRS commenced its examination for the 2005 and 2006 tax years. We expect this examination to be completed by the end of the current year. In addition, we have various tax years under examination by tax authorities in various countries, such as the United Kingdom, and in various states, such as New York, in which we have significant business operations. It is not yet known whether these examinations will, in the aggregate, result in our paying additional taxes. We believe our tax reserves are adequate in relation to the potential for additional assessments in each of the jurisdictions in which we are subject to taxation. We regularly assess the likelihood of additional tax assessments in those jurisdictions and, if necessary, adjust our reserves as additional information or events require.

With respect to all tax years open to examination by U.S. federal and various state, local and non-U.S. tax authorities, we currently anticipate that total unrecognized tax benefits will decrease by an amount between $65.0$35.0 and $75.0$45.0 in the next

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements – (continued)

(Amounts in Millions, Except Per Share Amounts)

(Unaudited)

twelve months, a portion of which will affect the effective tax rate, primarily as a result of the settlement of tax examinations and the lapsing of statutes of limitations. This net decrease is related to various items of income and expense, including transfer pricing adjustments and adjustments in various state and local jurisdictions.

We have effectively settled the U.S. federal income tax audits for years prior to 2005.2007. With limited exceptions, we are no longer subject to state and local income tax audits for the years prior to 1999 or non-U.S. income tax audits for the years prior to 2000.

In April 2009, the Obama administration proposed new corporate income tax provisions as part of the administration’s 2010 budget outline. Included in those proposals are changes to U.S. federal income taxation of international operations of U.S.-based multinational corporations. As a U.S.-based multinational corporation, we could be impacted by a number of the tax proposals if such proposals were to become law as currently proposed. While we have not yet determined the extent of the impact of any such proposals on our effective and cash tax rates, we expect that if such proposals were to become law there would be a negative impact to our effective and cash tax rates.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements – (continued)

(Amounts in Millions, Except Per Share Amounts)

(Unaudited)Note 7:  Comprehensive Income (Loss)

 

Note 6:  Comprehensive Income

   Three months ended
June 30,
 
       2009          2008     

Net Income

  $31.4  $98.3  

Foreign currency translation adjustment, net of tax

   74.0   (6.7

Adjustments to pension and other postretirement plans, net of tax

   4.0   (2.2

Net unrealized holding gains on securities, net of tax

   1.1   1.4  
         

Total comprehensive income

   110.5   90.8  

Comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interests

   5.1   3.2  
         

Comprehensive income attributable to IPG

  $105.4  $87.6  
         
   Three months ended
September 30,
 
   2009   2008 

Net income

  $25.9    $50.4  

Foreign currency translation adjustment, net of tax

   62.6     (78.2

Adjustments to pension and other postretirement plans, net of tax

   3.3     4.8  

Net unrealized holding losses on securities, net of tax

   (0.2   (1.1
          

Total comprehensive income (loss)

   91.6     (24.1

Comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interests

   3.0     3.8  
          

Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to IPG

  $88.6    $(27.9
          

Comprehensive income for the sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2009 and 2008 is displayed in the unaudited Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity and Comprehensive Income.

Note 7:8:  Incentive Compensation Plans

2009 Performance Incentive Plan

We issue stock and cash based incentive awards to our employees under a plan established by the Compensation and Leadership Talent Committee of the Board of Directors (“the(the “Compensation Committee”) and approved by our shareholders. In May 2009, our shareholders approved the 2009 Performance Incentive Plan (the “2009 PIP”), which replaced the 2006 Performance Incentive Plan (the “2006 PIP”) and previous incentive plans. The number of shares of common stock initially available for granting new stock options and stock appreciation rights under the 2009 PIP is 8.1. The number of shares of common stock initially available for performance-based awards and other stock-based awards under the 2009 PIP is 26.5. Subject to the terms of the 2009 PIP, there are limits on the number of shares that may be awarded to any one participant for each type of award. The vesting period of awards granted is generally commensurate with the requisite service period. We generally issue new shares to satisfy the exercise of stock options or the distribution of other stock-based awards. Additionally, we have the ability to issue performance cash awards. The performance cash awards are granted to certain employees who otherwise would have been eligible to receive performance-based stock awards. These awards have a service period vesting condition and a performance vesting condition. The amount of the performance cash award received by an employee with a performance vesting condition can range from 0% to 200% of the target amount of the original grant value. Performance cash awards generally vest in three years. A committee of the Board of Directors may grant performance cash awards to any eligible employee; however, no employee can receive more than $6.0 during a performance period.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements – (continued)

(Amounts in Millions, Except Per Share Amounts)

(Unaudited)

Cash Awards

In March 2009 the Compensation Committee approved the Interpublic Restricted Cash Plan (the “Cash Plan”). Under the Cash Plan, the Board of Directors, the Compensation Committee or the Plan Administrator may grant cash awards to certain employees eligible to receive stock-settled and cash-settled awards. Cash awards are generally granted on an annual basis, have a service period vesting condition and generally vest in three years. During the sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2009 the Compensation Committee granted awards under the Cash Plan with a total value of $26.8$28.4, and we recognized $1.4$2.8 in salaries and related expenseexpenses in our unaudited Consolidated Statement of Operations.

The 2006 PIP was amended to grant performance cash awards in March 2009. During the sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2009, the Compensation Committee granted new performance cash awards under the 2006 PIP and the 2009 PIP with a total target value of $31.6,$31.7, and we recognized $1.6$2.7 in salaries and related expenseexpenses in our unaudited Consolidated Statement of Operations.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements – (continued)

(Amounts in Millions, Except Per Share Amounts)

(Unaudited)

We amortize the present value of the amount expected to vest for cash awards and performance cash awards over the vesting period using the straight-line method, less an assumed forfeiture rate. Cash awards do not fall within the scope of SFAS No. 123R,Share-Based Payment,the authoritative guidance for stock compensation as they are not paid in equity and the value of the award is not correlated with our stock price. Due to the cash nature of the payouts and the vesting period, we account for these awards in accordance with APB Opinion No. 12,Deferred Compensation Contracts.authoritative guidance for deferred compensation arrangements.

Stock-Based Compensation

We issued the following stock-based awards under the 2006 PIP and the 2009 PIP during the sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2009.

 

  Awards  Weighted-average
grant-date fair value
(per award)
  Awards  Weighted-average
grant-date fair value
(per award)

Stock options

  3.8  $2.69  3.8  $2.69

Stock-settled awards

  7.5  $4.16  7.7  $4.19

Cash-settled awards

  1.2  $4.15  1.4  $4.36

Performance-based awards

  1.5  $6.25  1.7  $6.25
          

Total stock-based compensation awards

  14.0    14.6  
          

Stock options are granted with the exercise price equal to the fair market value of our common stock on the grant date, are generally exercisable between two and four years from the grant date and expire ten years from the grant date (or earlier in the case of certain terminations of employment).

We grant other stock-based compensation awards such as stock-settled awards, cash-settled awards and performance-based awards (settled in cash or shares) to certain key employees. The number of shares or units received by an employee for performance-based awards depends on Company performance against specific performance targets and could range from 0% to 200% of the target amount of shares originally granted. Incentive awards are subject to certain restrictions and vesting requirements as determined by the Compensation Committee. The fair value of the shares on the grant date is amortized over the vesting period, which is generally three years. Upon completion of the vesting period for cash-settled awards, which include restricted stock units expected to be settled in cash, the grantee is entitled to receive a payment in cash or in shares of common stock based on the fair market value of the corresponding number of shares of common stock. No monetary consideration is paid by a recipient for any incentive award, and theaward. The fair value of the shares on the grant date is amortized over the vesting period, except for cash-settled awards where the quarterly-adjusted fair valueis adjusted each quarter based on our share price isand amortized over the vesting period. The holders of cash-settled and performance-based awards have no ownership interest in the underlying shares of common stock until the awards vest and the shares of common stock are issued.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements – (continued)

(Amounts in Millions, Except Per Share Amounts)

(Unaudited)

In conjunction with our annual grant of long-term incentive compensation awards we reviewed our estimates and assumptions in the first quarter of 2009, which resulted in an increase to our estimated forfeiture rate, as our review of our actual forfeitures over the last ten years indicated a higher level of forfeitures than previously assumed.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements – (continued)

(Amounts in Millions, Except Per Share Amounts)

(Unaudited)

Note 8:9:  Employee Benefits

We have a defined benefit plan which covers substantially all regular U.S. employees employed through March 31, 1998. In addition, some of our agencies have other domestic plans which are closed to new participants. We also have numerous plans outside of the U.S., some of which are funded, while others provide payments at the time of retirement or termination under applicable labor laws or agreements. Some of our domestic and foreign subsidiaries also provide postretirement health benefits to eligible employees and their dependents. Additionally, some of our domestic subsidiaries provide postretirement life insurance to eligible employees. Certain immaterial foreign pension plans have been excluded from the tables below. The components of net periodic cost for the domestic pension plans, the principal foreign pension plans and the postretirement benefit plans are listed below.

 

  Domestic
pension plans
 Foreign
pension plans
 Postretirement
benefit plans
   Domestic
pension plans
 Foreign
pension plans
 Postretirement
benefit plans
 

Three months ended June 30,

  2009 2008 2009 2008 2009 2008 

Three months ended September 30,

  2009 2008 2009 2008 2009 2008 

Service cost

  $   $   $2.8   $4.0   $0.1   $  

Interest cost

   1.9    2.1    6.0    6.8    0.7    0.6  

Expected return on plan assets

   (1.7  (2.6  (3.7  (6.1        

Amortization of:

       

Transition obligation

               0.1          

Prior service cost

           0.1    0.1          

Unrecognized actuarial losses (gains)

   2.1    1.4    0.6    0.2        (0.5

Curtailment loss

               0.1          
                   

Net periodic cost

  $2.3   $0.9   $5.8   $5.2   $0.8   $0.1  
                   
  Domestic
pension plans
 Foreign
pension plans
 Postretirement
benefit plans
 

Nine months ended September 30,

  2009 2008 2009 2008 2009 2008 

Service cost

  $—     $—     $2.7   $4.4   $0.1   $0.2    $   $   $8.1   $12.3   $0.3   $0.3  

Interest cost

   2.1    2.2    5.6    7.1    0.8    0.9     6.0    6.3    17.0    20.9    2.3    2.4  

Expected return on plan assets

   (1.9  (2.6  (3.3  (6.2  —      —       (5.5  (7.8  (10.2  (18.6        

Amortization of:

              

Transition obligation

   —      —      —      —      0.1    0.1                 0.1    0.1    0.1  

Prior service cost (credit)

   —      —      0.1    0.1    (0.1  (0.1           0.2    0.3    (0.1  (0.1

Unrecognized actuarial losses

   2.7    1.7    0.6    0.1    —      0.2     7.3    4.3    1.8    0.5          

Curtailment gain

   —      —      —      (0.3  —      —                   (0.2        

Settlement loss

   —      —      1.5    —      —      —               1.5              
                                      

Net periodic cost

  $2.9   $1.3   $7.2   $5.2   $0.9   $1.3    $7.8   $2.8   $18.4   $15.3   $2.6   $2.7  
                                      
  Domestic
pension plans
 Foreign
pension plans
 Postretirement
benefit plans
 

Six months ended June 30,

  2009 2008 2009 2008 2009 2008 

Service cost

  $—     $—     $5.3   $8.3   $0.2   $0.3  

Interest cost

   4.1    4.2    11.0    14.1    1.6    1.8  

Expected return on plan assets

   (3.8  (5.2  (6.5  (12.5  —      —    

Amortization of:

       

Transition obligation

   —      —      —      —      0.1    0.1  

Prior service cost (credit)

   —      —      0.1    0.2    (0.1  (0.1

Unrecognized actuarial losses

   5.2    2.9    1.2    0.3    —      0.5  

Curtailment gain

   —      —      —      (0.3  —      —    

Settlement loss

   —      —      1.5    —      —      —    
                   

Net periodic cost

  $5.5   $1.9   $12.6   $10.1   $1.8   $2.6  
                   

During the three and sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2009, we made contributions of $5.1$7.5 and $14.1,$21.6, respectively, to our foreign pension plans and no contributions to ourthe domestic pension plans.plans were negligible. For the remainder of 2009, we expect to contribute approximately $12.0$6.0 to our foreign pension plans and approximately $5.0make no contributions to our domestic pension plans.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements – (continued)

(Amounts in Millions, Except Per Share Amounts)

(Unaudited)

Note 9:10:  Segment Information

We have two reportable segments: Integrated Agency Networks (“IAN”), which is comprised of Draftfcb, Lowe, McCann Worldgroup, Mediabrands and our domestic integrated agencies, and Constituency Management Group (“CMG”), which is comprised of a number of our specialist marketing service offerings. We also report results for the “Corporate and other” group. The profitability measure employed by our chief operating decision maker for allocating resources to our operating divisions and assessing operating division performance is operating income, excluding the impact of restructuring

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements – (continued)

(Amounts in Millions, Except Per Share Amounts)

(Unaudited)

and other reorganization-related (reversals) charges (reversals) and long-lived asset impairment and other charges, if applicable. Segment information is presented consistently with the basis described in our 2008 Annual Report on Form 10-K as filed on February 27, 2009 and Form 8-K dated as of June 8, 2009. Summarized financial information concerning our reportable segments is shown in the following table.

 

  Three months ended
June 30,
 Six months ended
June 30,
  Three months ended
September 30,
 Nine months ended
September 30,
 
  2009 2008 2009 2008  2009 2008 2009 2008 

Revenue:

         

IAN

  $1,248.2   $1,538.7   $2,363.1   $2,779.8   $1,191.9   $1,450.1   $3,555.0   $4,229.7  

CMG

   226.2    297.0    436.6    541.1    234.8    289.9    671.4    831.2  
                         

Total

  $1,474.4   $1,835.7   $2,799.7   $3,320.9   $1,426.7   $1,740.0   $4,226.4   $5,060.9  
                         

Segment operating income:

         

IAN

  $114.5   $220.6   $57.0   $200.8   $78.7   $144.0   $135.7   $344.5  

CMG

   20.8    25.5    25.3    32.2    18.2    23.8    43.5    56.2  

Corporate and other

   (38.4  (41.4  (67.5  (82.9  (39.1  (47.6  (106.6  (130.4
                         

Total

   96.9    204.7    14.8    150.1    57.8    120.2    72.6    270.3  
                         

Restructuring and other reorganization-related (charges) reversals

   —      (4.1  0.2    (7.3

Restructuring and other reorganization-related reversals (charges)

  0.5    (3.9  0.7    (11.2

Interest expense

   (45.1  (53.0  (79.9  (110.7  (37.8  (53.2  (117.7  (163.9

Interest income

   8.1    23.0    20.4    51.7    7.6    23.3    28.0    75.0  

Other (expense) income, net

   (23.3  6.3    (18.4  4.9  

Other income (expense), net

  1.0    (1.0  (17.4  3.9  
                         

Income (loss) before income taxes

  $36.6   $176.9   $(62.9 $88.7   $29.1   $85.4   $(33.8 $174.1  
                         

Depreciation and amortization of fixed assets and intangible assets:

         

IAN

  $33.5   $32.3   $66.1   $64.7   $32.7   $34.6   $98.8   $99.3  

CMG

   3.6    4.4    7.2    8.4    3.6    3.7    10.8    12.1  

Corporate and other

   5.6    6.5    11.2    13.2    5.7    5.9    16.9    19.1  
                         

Total

  $42.7   $43.2   $84.5   $86.3   $42.0   $44.2   $126.5   $130.5  
             
            

Capital expenditures:

         

IAN

  $12.5   $23.6   $20.9   $48.7   $9.5   $20.4   $30.4   $69.1  

CMG

   1.3    2.0    2.2    6.4    1.6    3.0    3.8    9.4  

Corporate and other

   2.2    1.3    4.6    3.7    4.9    0.6    9.5    4.3  
                         

Total

  $16.0   $26.9   $27.7   $58.8   $16.0   $24.0   $43.7   $82.8  
                         
  June 30,
2009
 December 31,
2008
    September 30,
2009
 December 31,
2008
     

Total assets:

        

IAN

  $9,030.0   $9,712.2    $8,953.1   $9,712.2    

CMG

   908.2    929.1     892.4    929.1    

Corporate and other

   1,126.9    1,483.9     1,132.8    1,483.9    
                

Total

  $11,065.1   $12,125.2    $10,978.3   $12,125.2    
                

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements – (continued)

(Amounts in Millions, Except Per Share Amounts)

(Unaudited)

 

Note 10:11:  Fair Value Measurements

SFAS No. 157,Fair Value Measurements,Authoritative guidance on fair value measurements and disclosures establishes a fair value hierarchy which requires us to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. We primarily apply the market approach for recurring fair value measurements. The standard describesThere are three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value:

 

Level 1

    Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. An active market for the asset or liability is a market in which transactions for the asset or liability occur with sufficient frequency and volume to provide pricing information on an ongoing basis.

Level 2

    Observable inputs other than Level 1 prices, such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities; quoted prices in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities.

Level 3

    Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities.

The following table presents information about our assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of JuneSeptember 30, 2009 and indicates the fair value hierarchylevel of the valuation techniquesinput utilized to determine such fair value.

 

  Level 1 Level 3 Total   Level 1 Level 3 Total 

Assets

        

Cash equivalents

  $1,068.7   $—     $1,068.7    $1,106.0   $   $1,106.0  

Short-term marketable securities

   10.9    —      10.9     10.6        10.6  

Long-term investments 1

   18.5    6.7    25.2     15.7    6.7    22.4  

Foreign currency derivatives

   —      0.8    0.8         0.7    0.7  
                    

Total

  $1,098.1   $7.5   $1,105.6    $1,132.3   $7.4   $1,139.7  
                    

As a percentage of total assets

   9.9  0.1  10.0   10.3  0.1  10.4

Liabilities

        

Mandatorily redeemable noncontrolling interests 2

  $—     $37.2   $37.2    $   $42.3   $42.3  

 

1During the second quarter of 2009, we recorded a charge of $0.6 reflected in other (expense) income, net in the unaudited Consolidated Statement of Operations related to one of our Level 1 investments that had an other-than-temporary decline in value that reduced the carrying amount to $0.6. Level 3 investments relate to $12.5 in par value of asset backedasset-backed auction rate securities. Since August 2007, auctions have failed due to insufficient bids from buyers, which required us to adjust the securities to a book value of $6.7 during the fourth quarter of 2007. We intend to hold our auction rate securities until we can recover the full principal and have classified the auction rate securities as long-term investments within other assets in our unaudited Consolidated Balance Sheets.
2Relates to obligations to purchase noncontrolling equity shares of consolidated subsidiaries, valued pursuant to SFAS No. 150,Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Characteristic of Both Liabilities and Equity.authoritative guidance on mandatorily redeemable financial instruments. Fair value measurements of the obligation were based upon the amount payable as if the forward contracts were settled as of JuneSeptember 30, 2009.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements – (continued)

(Amounts in Millions, Except Per Share Amounts)

(Unaudited)

 

The following table presents additional information about assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis utilizing Level 3 inputs.

Three months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2009

 

   Balance as of
March 31, 2009
  Level 3 additions  Realized gains
(losses) included
in net income
  Balance as of
June 30, 2009

Assets

       

Auction rate securities

  $6.7  $—    $—     $6.7

Foreign currency derivatives

   0.7   —     0.1    0.8

Liabilities

       

Mandatorily redeemable noncontrolling interests

  $33.5  $—    $(3.7 $37.2

Six months ended June 30, 2009

  Balance as of
December 31, 2008
  Level 3 additions  Realized gains
(losses) included
in net loss
  Balance as of
June 30, 2009
  Balance as of
June 30, 2009
  Level 3 additions  Realized losses
included in net
income
 Balance as of
September 30, 2009

Assets

               

Auction rate securities

  $6.7  $—    $—    $6.7

Long-term investments

  $6.7  $  $   $6.7

Foreign currency derivatives

   0.8   —     —     0.8   0.8      (0.1  0.7

Liabilities

               

Mandatorily redeemable noncontrolling interests

  $21.6  $20.1  $4.5  $37.2  $37.2  $2.4  $(2.7 $42.3

Nine months ended September 30, 2009

Nine months ended September 30, 2009

     
  Balance as of
December 31, 2008
  Level 3 additions  Realized gains
(losses) included in
net loss
 Balance as of
September 30, 2009

Assets

       

Long-term investments

  $6.7  $  $   $6.7

Foreign currency derivatives

   0.8      (0.1  0.7

Liabilities

       

Mandatorily redeemable noncontrolling interests

  $21.6  $22.5  $1.8   $42.3

Level 3 additions relate to an unconditional obligationobligations to purchase an additional equity interestinterests in an acquisitionprevious acquisitions for cash, which is considered to be a mandatorily redeemable financial instrument. Realized gains (losses) included in net income (loss) for foreign currency derivatives and mandatorily redeemable noncontrolling interests are reported as a component of other income (expense) income,, net and interest expense, respectively, in the unaudited Consolidated Statements of Operations.

Note 11:12:  Commitments and Contingencies

Legal Matters

We are or have been involved in legal and administrative proceedings of various types. While any litigation contains an element of uncertainty, we do not believe that the outcome of such proceedings or claims will have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations or cash flow.

Guarantees

As discussed in our 2008 Annual Report on Form 10-K, we have guarantees of certain obligations of our subsidiaries relating principally to credit facilities, certain media payables and operating leases of certain subsidiaries. The amount of such parent company guarantees was $268.7$269.0 and $255.7 as of JuneSeptember 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements – (continued)

(Amounts in Millions, Except Per Share Amounts)

(Unaudited)

 

Note 12:13:  Recent Accounting Standards

In September 2009, the Emerging Issues Task Force reached a consensus related to revenue arrangements with multiple deliverables. The consensus will be issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) as an update to authoritative guidance for revenue recognition and will be effective for the Company January 1, 2011. The updated guidance will revise how the estimated selling price of each deliverable in a multiple element arrangement is determined when the deliverables do not have stand-alone value. In addition, the revised guidance will require additional disclosures about the methods and assumptions used to evaluate multiple element arrangements and to identify the significant deliverables within those arrangements. We are currently evaluating the potential impact of the amended guidance on our Consolidated Financial Statements.

In August 2009, the FASB amended authoritative guidance for determining the fair value of liabilities, which will be effective for the Company October 1, 2009. The amended guidance reiterates that the fair value measurement of a liability (1) should be based on the assumption that the liability was transferred to a market participant on the measurement date and (2) should include the risk of nonperformance. In addition, the guidance establishes a hierarchy for determining the fair value of liabilities. Specifically, an entity must first determine whether a quoted price, from an active market, is available for identical liabilities before utilizing an alternative valuation technique. We do not expect the adoption of this guidance to have a significant impact on our Consolidated Financial Statements.

In June 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 168,The FASB Accounting Standards Codification and the Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles a replacement of FASB Statement No. 162, (“SFAS 168”(the “FASB Codification”), which is effective for the Company July 1, 2009. SFAS 168The FASB Codification does not alter current U.S. GAAP, but rather integrates existing accounting standards with other authoritative guidance. Under SFAS 168the FASB Codification there will beis a single source of authoritative U.S. GAAP for nongovernmental entities and will supersedethis has superseded all other previously issued non-SEC accounting and reporting guidance. The adoption of SFAS 168 willthe FASB Codification did not have any impact on our Consolidated Financial Statements.

In June 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 167,Amendmentsamendments to FASB Interpretation No. 46 (Revised December 2003), Consolidationauthoritative guidance on consolidation of Variable Interest Entities, (“SFAS 167”),variable interest entities, which iswill be effective for the Company January 1, 2010. SFAS 167The amended guidance revises factors that should be considered by a reporting entity when determining whether an entity that is insufficiently capitalized or is not controlled through voting (or similar rights) should be consolidated. SFAS 167This guidance also includes revised financial statement disclosures regarding the reporting entity’s involvement and risk exposure. We are currently evaluating the potential impact of SFAS 167the amended guidance on theour Consolidated Financial Statements.

In May 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 165,Subsequent Events, (“SFAS 165”),authoritative guidance on subsequent events, which is effective for the Company June 30, 2009. SFAS 165 providesThis guidance for disclosingaddresses the disclosure of events that occur after the balance sheet date, but before financial statements are issued or available to be issued. The adoption of SFAS 165this guidance did not have a significant impact on our Consolidated Financial Statements.

In April 2009, the FASB issued FSP FAS 107-1 and APB 28-1 to amend FASB Statement No. 107,Disclosuresamended authoritative guidance on disclosures about Fair Valuethe fair value of Financial Instruments, and APB Opinion No. 28,Interim Financial Reporting,financial instruments, which is effective for the Company June 30, 2009. The FSPamended guidance requires a publicly traded company to include disclosures about fair value of its financial instruments whenever it issues summarized financial information for interim reporting periods. In addition, the guidance requires an entity to disclose either in the body or the accompanying notes of its summarized financial information the fair value of all financial instruments for which it is practicable to estimate that value, whether recognized or not recognized in the statement of financial position, as required by Statement No. 107.position. The adoption of this guidance did not have a significant impact on our unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements.

In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS 160,authoritative guidance on noncontrolling interests which requires a noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary to be reported as equity on our unaudited Consolidated Balance Sheets separate from the parent’s equity. The standardguidance also requires transactions that do not result in the deconsolidation of the subsidiary be recorded as equity transactions, while those transactions that do result in a change from noncontrolling to controlling ownership or a

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements – (continued)

(Amounts in Millions, Except Per Share Amounts)

(Unaudited)

deconsolidation of the subsidiary be recorded in net income (loss) income with the gain or loss measured at fair value. SFAS 160This guidance is effective January 1, 2009 and has been applied prospectively with the exception of presentation and disclosure requirements which have been applied retrospectively for all periods presented.

In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141 (revised),Business Combinations (“SFAS 141R”), which replaces SFAS No. 141, Business Combinations.authoritative guidance on business combinations. Under the standard,guidance, an acquiring entity is required to record assets acquired and liabilities assumed in a business combination at fair value on the date of acquisition. Earn-out payments and other forms of contingent consideration are also required to be recorded at fair value on the acquisition date. The standardFair value measurements are also requires fair value measurementsrequired to be used when recording noncontrolling interests and contingent liabilities. In addition, the standard requires all costs associated with the business combination, including restructuring costs, are required to be expensed as incurred. For the Company, SFAS 141Rthis revised guidance is effective prospectively for business combinations having an acquisition date on or after January 1, 2009, with the exception of the accounting for valuation allowances on deferred taxes and acquired tax contingencies. SFAS 141R amends SFAS 109 such that adjustmentsAdjustments made to valuation allowances on deferred taxes and acquired tax contingencies associated with acquisitions that closed prior to January 1, 2009 would also apply the provisions of SFAS 141R.

this revised guidance.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements – (continued)

(AmountsThe FASB issued additional authoritative guidance on business combinations in Millions, Except Per Share Amounts)

(Unaudited)

In March 2009, the FASB issued FSP FAS 141(R)-1,Accounting for Assets Acquired and Liabilities Assumed in a Business Combination(“FSP FAS 141(R)-1”), which amends the guidance in SFAS 141R,specifically, for the initial recognition and measurement, subsequent measurement, and disclosures of assets and liabilities arising from contingencies in a business combination. In addition, FSP FAS 141(R)-1 amends the existing guidance related to accountingcombination as well as for pre-existing contingent consideration assumed as part of the business combination. FSP FAS 141(R)-1This guidance is effective for the Company January 1, 2009.

The adoption of SFAS 141R and FSP FAS 141(R)-1the authoritative guidance for business combinations did not have a significant impact on our unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements. However, any business combinations entered into in the future may impact our Consolidated Financial Statements as a result of the potential earnings volatility due to the changes described above.

Note 13:  Subsequent Events

We have evaluated subsequent events through the filing of this Form 10-Q on July 28, 2009, and determined there have not been any events that have occurred that would require adjustments to our unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

(Amounts in Millions, Except Per Share Amounts)

(Unaudited)

 

Item 2.Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

The following Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (“MD&A”) is intended to help you understand The Interpublic Group of Companies, Inc. and subsidiaries (the “Company,” “Interpublic,” “we,” “us” or “our”). MD&A should be read in conjunction with our unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements and the accompanying notes included in this report, the 2008 Annual Report on Form 10-K as filed on February 27, 2009 and the revisions made on Form 8-K dated as of June 8, 2009, as well as our other reports on Form 8-K and other SEC filings. Our Annual Report includes additional information about our significant accounting policies and practices as well as details about our most significant risks and uncertainties associated with our financial and operating results. Our MD&A includes the following sections:

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY provides a discussion about our strategic outlook, factors influencing our business and an overview of our results of operations.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS provides an analysis of the consolidated and segment results of operations for the periods presented.

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES provides an overview of our cash flows, funding requirements, financing and sources of funds.

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING ESTIMATES provides an update to the discussion of our accounting policies that require critical judgment, assumptions and estimates in our 2008 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

RECENT ACCOUNTING STANDARDS, by reference to Note 1213 to the unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements, provides a discussion of certain accounting standards that have been adopted during 2009 and certain accounting standards which we have not yet been required to implement and may be applicable to our future operations.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

We are one of the world’s premier global advertising and marketing services companies. Our agencies create marketing programs for clients to achieve or improve their business results, which in turn, generates sales, earnings and cash flow for us. Our agencies deliver services across the full spectrum of marketing disciplines and specialties, including advertising, direct marketing, public relations, events marketing, mobile marketing, internet and search engine marketing, social media marketing and media buying and planning. Major global brands in our portfolio of companies include Draftfcb, FutureBrand, GolinHarris, Initiative, Jack Morton, Lowe, McCann Erickson, Momentum, MRM, R/GA, Octagon, Universal McCannUM and Weber Shandwick. Leading domestic brands include Campbell-Ewald, Carmichael Lynch, Deutsch, Hill Holliday, The Martin Agency and Mullen.

Our strategic outlook is thatfor our high-quality, comprehensive global services willto remain critical to the competitiveness of our clients for the remainder of 2009 and beyond as they look to build brands and market share in aan increasingly complex and fragmented media landscape that continues to grow more complex.landscape. Our business objectives are to continue to strengthen our full range of marketing expertise, while focusing our investment on the fastest growing marketsgeographic regions and disciplines.marketing channels. Our long-term financial objectives include organic revenue growth at competitive levels while achieving further operating margin expansion, ultimately to the level of our global peer group. Accordingly, we remain focused on cost control, effective resource utilization, including the productivity of our employees, real estate, and information technology, and reduction of certain discretionary expenses.

The global economic recession has continued through the first half of 2009, which has made business conditions extremely challenging for nearly all companies.companies during 2009. These conditions adversely affectedaffect the demand for advertising and marketing services in the first half of 2009, and will present a challenge to the revenue and profit growth of our Company and our sector as a whole for as long as theythe difficult economic conditions persist. TheseDue to general economic conditions if they persist, could also require an interim evaluation ofand their effect on our assumptions with respect to the recoverability of our goodwill at certain reporting units, which could result in impairment charges. Werevenue, we initiated significant severance actions in the fourth quarter of 2008, which have continued through the first half of 2009. The benefits from these actions will continue to be recognized in future periods. While we cannot

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – (continued)

(Amounts in Millions, Except Per Share Amounts)

(Unaudited)

 

quarter of 2008, which have continued through the first nine months of 2009. The expense benefits from these actions will continue to be recognized in future periods. While we cannot predict the continuing magnitude and duration of the economic downturn or its impact on the demand for our services, we believe that we will continue to derive benefits from our diversified client base, global presence and broad range of services.

Recent In addition, improvements in our financial reporting and business information systems provide us with timely and actionable insights from our businesses around the world, which allows us to more effectively manage our business. Our extensive internal reporting improvements over the past several years have strengthened our ability to effectively manage our expenses.

Our balance sheet and liquidity are important sources of financial flexibility. We have taken recent measures through July 7, 2009 to strengthen our debt maturity profile by issuing $600.0 in aggregate principal amount of notes due in 2017 and repurchasing $714.0 aggregate principal amount of notes maturing in 2009, 2010 and 2011.

One of our largest clients, General Motors Corporation (“GM”), and certain of its U.S. affiliates filed voluntary petitions for relief under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code in June and completed their reorganization in July. We did not incur any charges related to outstanding amounts due from GM during the second quarter of 2009 asAs a result of the bankruptcy proceedings,challenging economic conditions and their impact on the projected profitability of certain reporting units, we performed an interim evaluation with respect to the recoverability of our goodwill at certain reporting units during the third quarter of 2009. Based on the interim analysis, we concluded that there was no impairment in the third quarter of 2009. Our annual impairment review of goodwill is as of October 1, 2009, and our review of our reporting units financial projections and assumptions in estimating fair value could result in an impairment charge in the fourth quarter of 2009. See the Critical Accounting Estimates section within this MD&A and Note 4 to the unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements for further information.

On October 15, 2009, we announced the alignment of Deutsch and Lowe in order to build on the complementary strengths of the two agencies to create a more powerful offering and accelerate our growth. We anticipate that Lowe will be strengthened by adding a dynamic U.S. agency to its strong global network, and that Deutsch will benefit from the multinational reach of Lowe. Deutsch will now be referred to as Deutsch, Inc., a Lowe & Partners Company. The combined entity will remain in the Integrated Agency Network (“IAN”) segment. We are continuingformalizing our plans and expect to provide advertising services to GM.incur certain reorganization charges in the fourth quarter of 2009 and into 2010 as we implement those plans.

SecondThird Quarter and First HalfNine Months of 2009 and 2008 Highlights

 

  Three months ended
June 30, 2009
 Six months ended
June 30, 2009
 
  Total Organic Total Organic   Three months ended
September 30, 2009
 Nine months ended
September 30, 2009
 

% decrease

       Total Organic Total Organic 

Revenue

   (19.7)%   (14.5)%   (15.7)%   (10.5)%    (18.0%)   (14.2%)   (16.5%)   (11.8%) 

Salaries and related expenses

   (12.2)%   (7.5)%   (9.4)%   (4.7)%    (13.7%)   (10.0%)   (10.8%)   (6.5%) 

Office and general expenses

   (22.5)%   (16.2)%   (18.2)%   (12.5)%    (19.2%)   (15.1%)   (18.6%)   (13.4%) 
  Three months ended
June 30,
 Six months ended
June 30,
   Three months ended
September 30,
 Nine months ended
September 30,
 
  2009 2008 2009 2008   2009 2008 2009 2008 

Operating margin

   6.6  10.9  0.5  4.3   4.1  6.7  1.7  5.1

Expenses as % of revenue

     

Expenses as % of revenue:

     

Salaries and related expenses

   65.7  60.1  70.2  65.3   66.1  62.8  68.8  64.4

Office and general expenses

   27.7  28.8  29.3  30.2   29.8  30.2  29.5  30.2

Net income (loss) available to IPG common stockholders

  $20.9   $88.1   $(53.0 $18.2    $17.2   $38.7   $(35.8 $56.7  

Earnings (loss) per share available to IPG common stockholders:

          

Basic

  $0.04   $0.19   $(0.11 $0.04    $0.04   $0.08   $(0.08 $0.12  

Diluted

  $0.04   $0.17   $(0.11 $0.04    $0.03   $0.08   $(0.08 $0.12  

When we analyze period-to-period changes in our operating performance we determine the portion of the change that is attributable to exchange rates and to the net effect of acquisitions and divestitures and the remainder, which we call organic

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – (continued)

(Amounts in Millions, Except Per Share Amounts)

(Unaudited)

change, indicates how our underlying business performed. The performance metrics that we use to analyze our results include the organic change in revenue, salaries and related expenses and office and general expenses, and the components of operating expenses, expressed as a percentage of revenue. These performance metrics are consistent with the information used by management to analyze our results. Additionally, in certain of our discussions we analyze revenue by business sector, where we focus on our top 100 clients, which typically constitute 50%-55% of our consolidated revenues, and geographic region.

The change in our operating performance attributable to foreign currency rates is determined by converting the prior periodprior-period results using the current period exchange rates and comparing the prior periodprior-period adjusted amounts to the prior periodprior-period results. Although the U.S. Dollar is our reporting currency, a substantial portion of our revenues and expenses are generated in foreign currencies. Therefore, our reported results are affected by fluctuations in the currencies in which we conduct our international businesses. We do not use derivative financial instruments to manage this translation risk. As a result, both

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – (continued)

(Amounts in Millions, Except Per Share Amounts)

(Unaudited)

positive and negative currency fluctuations against the U.S. Dollar will continue to affect our consolidated results of operations. ForeignFor the three months ended September 30, 2009, foreign currency fluctuations resulted in decreases of approximately 7%4% in revenues, salaries and related expenses and office and general expenses, which contributed to a net decrease in operating income of approximately 4% compared to the prior-year period. For the nine months ended September 30, 2009, foreign currency fluctuations resulted in decreases of approximately 6% in revenues and salaries and related expenses and approximately 8%7% in office and general expenses, which contributed to a net decrease in operating income of approximately 6% and 5% to operating income for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009, respectively,4% compared to the prior-year periods. Duringperiod. Since the second half of 2008 and the first half of 2009 the U.S. Dollar has strengthened against several foreign currencies, which had a negative impact on our consolidated results of operations. However, in recent months the U.S. Dollar has weakened against several foreign currencies, and if this trend continues, it could have a continuing negativepositive impact on our consolidated results of operations.

For purposes of analyzing changes in our operating performance attributable to the net effect of acquisitions and divestitures, transactions are treated as if they occurred on the first day of the quarter during which the transaction occurred. During the past few years we have acquired companies that we believe will enhance our offering and disposed of businesses that are not consistent with our strategic plan. For the secondthird quarter of 2009, the net effect of acquisitions and divestitures had a minimal impact on revenue and operating expenses compared to the prior-year period. For the first halfnine months of 2009, the net effect of acquisitions and divestitures increased revenue and operating expenses compared to the respective prior-year period.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Consolidated Results of Operations – Three and SixNine Months Ended JuneSeptember 30, 2009 compared to Three and SixNine Months Ended JuneSeptember 30, 2008

REVENUE

 

  Three months
ended
June 30, 2008
  Components of change Three months
ended
June 30, 2009
  Change   Three months
ended
September 30, 2008
  Components of change Three months
ended
September 30, 2009
  Change 
  Foreign
currency
 Net
acquisitions/
(divestitures)
  Organic   Organic Total   Foreign
currency
 Net
acquisitions/
(divestitures)
 Organic   Organic Total 

Consolidated

  $1,835.7  $(130.3 $35.1  $(266.1 $1,474.4  (14.5)%  (19.7)%   $1,740.0  $(67.9 $1.6   $(247.0 $1,426.7  (14.2%)  (18.0%) 

Domestic

   991.0   —      8.0   (151.9  847.1  (15.3)%  (14.5)%    963.8       (0.3  (129.4  834.1  (13.4%)  (13.5%) 

International

   844.7   (130.3  27.1   (114.2  627.3  (13.5)%  (25.7)%    776.2   (67.9  1.9    (117.6  592.6  (15.2%)  (23.7%) 

United Kingdom

   164.5   (37.4  —     (25.8  101.3  (15.7)%  (38.4)%    158.2   (23.2      (30.8  104.2  (19.5%)  (34.1%) 

Continental Europe

   310.0   (47.3  1.3   (43.8  220.2  (14.1)%  (29.0)%    257.1   (22.0  (1.0  (43.2  190.9  (16.8%)  (25.7%) 

Asia Pacific

   181.6   (15.0  —     (26.1  140.5  (14.4)%  (22.6)%    157.0   (3.7  2.9    (15.3  140.9  (9.7%)  (10.3%) 

Latin America

   93.4   (17.8  —     2.3    77.9  2.5 (16.6)%    95.6   (13.4      (8.9  73.3  (9.3%)  (23.3%) 

Other

   95.2   (12.8  25.8   (20.8  87.4  (21.8)%  (8.2)%    108.3   (5.6      (19.4  83.3  (17.9%)  (23.1%) 

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – (continued)

(Amounts in Millions, Except Per Share Amounts)

(Unaudited)

During the secondthird quarter of 2009, our revenue decreased by $361.3$313.3, or 19.7%18.0%, compared to the secondthird quarter of 2008, primarily consisting of an organic revenue decrease of $266.1$247.0, or 14.5%14.2%, and an adverse foreign currency impact of $130.3.$67.9. The decrease is primarily attributable to the impact of global economic conditions on nearly all sectors of our business. RevenueOf our organic decrease, more than one-third was attributable to declines from several of our toplargest clients in the technology and telecom and the auto and transportation sectors, decreased disproportionatelywhich had contributed to our increase in 2008, primarily in the quarter, resulting in a decrease of approximately 5%, excluding the foreign currency impact. In addition, nearly 2% of our organic revenue decrease was related to prior-year project assignments in our events marketing discipline, which, due to economic conditions, did not recur or were substantially curtailed.IAN segment.

Our revenue is directly impacted by our ability to win new clients and the retention and spending levels of existing clients. Revenue is also subject to fluctuations related to seasonal spending by our clients. Most of our expenses are recognized ratably throughout the year and are therefore less seasonal than revenue. Our revenue is typically lowest in the first quarter and highest in the fourth quarter. This reflects the seasonal holiday spending of our clients, incentives earned at year-end on various contracts and project work completed that is typically recognized during the fourth quarter. Additionally, revenues can fluctuate due to the timing of completed projects in the events marketing business, as revenue is typically recognized when the project is complete. We generally act as principal for these projects and as such record the gross amount billed to the client as revenue and the related costs incurred as pass-through costs in office and general expenses.

Management’s Discussion Approximately 2% of our organic revenue decrease was related to prior-year project assignments in our events marketing discipline that, due to economic conditions, did not recur or were substantially curtailed. These projects are reflected in various sectors and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – (continued)

(Amounts in Millions, Except Per Share Amounts)

(Unaudited)geographic regions.

 

  Six months
ended
June 30, 2008
  Components of change Six months
ended
June 30, 2009
  Change      Components of change    Change 
  Foreign
currency
 Net
acquisitions/
(divestitures)
  Organic   Organic Total   Nine months
ended
September 30, 2008
  Foreign
currency
 Net
acquisitions/
(divestitures)
  Organic Nine months
ended
September 30, 2009
  Organic Total 

Consolidated

  $3,320.9  $(238.3 $66.7  $(349.6 $2,799.7  (10.5)%  (15.7)%   $5,060.9  $(306.2 $68.3  $(596.6 $4,226.4  (11.8%)  (16.5%) 

Domestic

   1,840.1   —      15.4   (227.0  1,628.5  (12.3)%  (11.5)%    2,803.8       15.1   (356.3  2,462.6  (12.7%)  (12.2%) 

International

   1,480.8   (238.3  51.3   (122.6  1,171.2  (8.3)%  (20.9)%    2,257.1   (306.2  53.2   (240.3  1,763.8  (10.6%)  (21.9%) 

United Kingdom

   311.0   (78.1  —     (20.0  212.9  (6.4)%  (31.5)%    469.1   (101.4     (50.7  317.0  (10.8%)  (32.4%) 

Continental Europe

   542.5   (79.8  2.9   (51.5  414.1  (9.5)%  (23.7)%    799.6   (101.8  1.9   (94.7  605.0  (11.8%)  (24.3%) 

Asia Pacific

   308.8   (25.5  —     (34.9  248.4  (11.3)%  (19.6)%    465.8   (29.3  2.9   (50.0  389.4  (10.7%)  (16.4%) 

Latin America

   158.4   (29.9  —     4.5    133.0  2.8 (16.0)%    254.0   (43.3     (4.4  206.3  (1.7%)  (18.8%) 

Other

   160.1   (25.0  48.4   (20.7  162.8  (12.9)%  1.7   268.6   (30.4  48.4   (40.5  246.1  (15.1%)  (8.4%) 

During the first halfnine months of 2009, our revenue decreased by $521.2$834.5, or 15.7%16.5%, compared to the first halfnine months of 2008, primarily consisting of an organic revenue decrease of $349.6$596.6, or 10.5%11.8%, and an adverse foreign currency impact of $238.3.$306.2. The organic decrease was driven by factors similar to those noted above for the secondthird quarter of 2009.

Refer to the segment discussion later in this MD&A for information on changes in revenue by segment.

OPERATING EXPENSES

 

   Three months ended
June 30,
  Six months ended
June 30,
   2009  2008  2009  2008

Salaries and related expenses

  $968.4  $1,103.2  $1,964.9   $2,168.0

Office and general expenses

   409.1   527.8   820.0    1,002.8

Restructuring and other reorganization-related charges (reversals)

   —     4.1   (0.2  7.3
                

Total operating expenses

  $1,377.5  $1,635.1  $2,784.7   $3,178.1
                

Operating income

  $96.9  $200.6  $15.0   $142.8
                

Salaries and Related Expenses

   2008  Components of change  2009  Change 
    Foreign
currency
  Net
acquisitions/
(divestitures)
  Organic    Organic  Total 

Three months ended June 30,

  $1,103.2  $(75.2 $23.6  $(83.2 $968.4  (7.5)%  (12.2)% 

Six months ended June 30,

   2,168.0   (150.0  49.3   (102.4  1,964.9  (4.7)%  (9.4)% 

Salaries and related expenses in the second quarter of 2009 decreased by $134.8 compared to the second quarter of 2008, primarily consisting of an organic decrease of $83.2 and a favorable foreign currency rate impact of $75.2. The organic decrease was due to lower base salaries, benefits and temporary help of $69.4, primarily related to work force reductions that were initiated in the fourth quarter of 2008 through the first half of 2009 to respond to the current economic conditions. We further reduced our work force in the second quarter of 2009 resulting in increased severance charges of $19.4 when compared to the second quarter of 2008. The largest components of our severance charges in the second quarter of 2009 were related to our advertising businesses in our Integrated Agency Network (“IAN”) segment and in Continental Europe and the U.S. regions. In total, the work force reductions we initiated since the fourth quarter of 2008 decreased headcount by approximately 4,100 employees, representing approximately 9% of our workforce. We expect additional workforce reductions in the third quarter, which will result in higher severance expense as compared to the prior-year period. We expect

   Three months ended
September 30,
  Nine months ended
September 30,
   2009  2008  2009  2008

Salaries and related expenses

  $943.5   $1,093.5  $2,908.4   $3,261.5

Office and general expenses

   425.4    526.3   1,245.4    1,529.1

Restructuring and other reorganization-related (reversals) charges

   (0.5  3.9   (0.7  11.2
                

Total operating expenses

  $1,368.4   $1,623.7  $4,153.1   $4,801.8
                

Operating income

  $58.3   $116.3  $73.3   $259.1
                

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – (continued)

(Amounts in Millions, Except Per Share Amounts)

(Unaudited)

 

Salaries and Related Expenses

      Components of change      Change 
       2008      Foreign
currency
   Net
acquisitions/
(divestitures)
   Organic       2009      Organic  Total 

Three months ended September 30,

  $1,093.5  $(40.2  $(0.9  $(108.9  $943.5  (10.0%)  (13.7%) 

Nine months ended September 30,

   3,261.5   (190.3   48.4     (211.2   2,908.4  (6.5%)  (10.8%) 

Salaries and related expenses in the third quarter of 2009 decreased by $150.0 compared to the third quarter of 2008, primarily consisting of an organic decrease of $108.9 and a favorable foreign currency rate impact of $40.2. The organic decrease was due to lower base salaries, benefits and temporary help of $88.1, primarily related to work force reductions that these workforcewere initiated in the fourth quarter of 2008 through the first nine months of 2009 to respond to the difficult economic conditions. Our work force reductions resulted in an organic increase in severance charges of $9.0 in the third quarter of 2009 when compared to the prior year. The largest components of our severance charges in the third quarter of 2009 were related to our advertising and media businesses in the IAN segment, primarily in the U.S. and Continental Europe regions. We expect additional work force reductions in the fourth quarter of 2009, which will contribute to further declines in base salaries and benefits through the remainder of the year. Another factoryear and into 2010. Also contributing to the organic decrease waswere a reduction in incentive award expense asof $23.3, resulting from lower annual bonus award accruals in 2009 due to reduced operating results, and, to a result oflesser extent, lower expected awards to be earned in 2009headcount when compared to the prior year as well as changes in our assumptions concerning the achievement of certain performance targets, resulting in lower-performance-based award accruals.year.

Salaries and related expenses in the first halfnine months of 2009 decreased by $203.1$353.1 compared to the first halfnine months of 2008, primarily consisting of an organic decrease of $211.2 and a favorable foreign currency impact of $150.0 and an organic decrease of $102.4.$190.3. We had an organic decrease forin base salaries, benefits and temporary help of $88.9, partially offset by an organic increase of $47.9 for severance expense. The organic change was$177.0, primarily due to factors similar to thosethe reasons noted above for the secondthird quarter of 2009. There was an organic increase in severance charges for the first nine months of 2009 as well asof $56.9, primarily in our advertising businesses within our IAN segment. In total, the work force reductions we initiated since the fourth quarter of 2008 have decreased headcount by approximately 5,100 employees, representing approximately 11% of our work force. Our organic decline in incentive award expense of $63.6 is primarily due to lower accruals related to reduced operating results and reductions in expected long-term incentive award expense primarily relateddue to an increase to our forfeiture rate as a result of higher actual forfeitures compared to estimates, which resulted in an increase to our forfeiture rate.estimates.

Changes in our incentive awards mix can impact future periodfuture-period expense, as bonus awards are expensed during the year they are earned and long-term incentive awards are expensed over the performance period, generally three years. Factors impacting long-term incentive awards are the actual number of awards vesting and the change in our stock price. Additionally, changes can occur based on projected results and could impact trends between various periods in the future. See Note 78 to the unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements for further information on our incentive compensation plans.

The following table details our salaries and related expenses as a percentage of consolidated revenue.

 

  Three months ended
June 30,
 Six months ended
June 30,
   Three months ended
September 30,
 Nine months ended
September 30,
 
  2009 2008 2009 2008   2009 2008 2009 2008 

Salaries and related expenses

  65.7 60.1 70.2 65.3  66.1 62.8 68.8 64.4

Base salaries, benefits and tax

  55.6 50.0 59.7 54.7  56.3 52.7 58.6 54.0

Incentive expense

  3.0 3.9 3.0 3.9  2.7 3.6 2.9 3.8

Severance expense

  2.0 0.6 2.6 0.7  1.6 0.9 2.2 0.8

Temporary help

  2.6 3.2 2.6 3.4  2.9 3.1 2.7 3.3

All other salaries and related expenses

  2.5 2.4 2.3 2.6  2.6 2.5 2.4 2.5

Our staff cost ratio, defined as salaries and related expenses as a percentage of revenue, increased to 65.7%66.1% from 60.1%62.8% in the secondthird quarter of 2009 and to 70.2%68.8% from 65.3%64.4% in the first halfnine months of 2009 from the comparable prior-year

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – (continued)

(Amounts in Millions, Except Per Share Amounts)

(Unaudited)

periods, primarily driven by lower revenues and increased severance expense, partially offset by lower base salaries, benefits, temporary help and incentive award expense.

Office and General Expenses

 

      Components of change     Change 
   2008  Foreign
currency
  Net
acquisitions/
(divestitures)
  Organic  2009  Organic  Total 

Three months ended June 30,

  $527.8  $(42.5 $9.2  $(85.4 $409.1  (16.2)%  (22.5)% 

Six months ended June 30,

   1,002.8   (81.5  23.8   (125.1  820.0  (12.5)%  (18.2)% 
      Components of change      Change 
       2008      Foreign
currency
   Net
acquisitions/
(divestitures)
  Organic       2009      Organic  Total 

Three months ended September 30,

  $526.3  $(22.3  $0.9  $(79.5  $425.4  (15.1%)  (19.2%) 

Nine months ended September 30,

   1,529.1   (103.8   24.7   (204.6   1,245.4  (13.4%)  (18.6%) 

Office and general expenses in the secondthird quarter of 2009 decreased by $118.7$100.9 compared to the secondthird quarter of 2008, primarily consisting of an organic decrease of $85.4$79.5 and a favorable foreign currency rate impact of $42.5.$22.3. The organic decrease was largely due to our cost containment efforts, which resulted in lower discretionary spending, primarily related to travel and entertainment.entertainment, office supplies and employment costs. Additionally, we incurred lower production expenses related to pass-through costs for certain prior-year projects where we acted as principal that did not recur or decreased in size during the secondthird quarter of 2009. Production expenses can vary significantly between periods depending upon the timing of completion of certain projects where we act as principal, which could impact trends between various periods in the future.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – (continued)

(Amounts in Millions, Except Per Share Amounts)

(Unaudited)

Office and general expenses in the first halfnine months of 2009 decreased by $182.8$283.7 compared to the first halfnine months of 2008, primarily consisting of an organic decrease of $125.1$204.6 and a favorable foreign currency rate impact of $81.5.$103.8. The organic decrease was due to factors similar to those noted above for the secondthird quarter of 2009.

The following table details our office and general expenses as a percentage of consolidated revenue. All other office and general expenses includes production expenses, depreciation and amortization, bad debt expense, foreign currency gains (losses) and other expenses.

 

  Three months ended
June 30,
 Six months ended
June 30,
   Three months ended
September 30,
 Nine months ended
September 30,
 
  2009 2008 2009 2008     2009     2008     2009     2008   

Office and general expenses

  27.7 28.8 29.3 30.2  29.8 30.2 29.5 30.2

Professional fees

  1.7 1.7 2.0 2.1  1.9 1.9 2.0 2.0

Occupancy expense (excluding depreciation and amortization)

  8.5 7.1 9.0 7.9  9.0 7.6 9.0 7.8

Travel & entertainment, office supplies and telecommunications

  3.4 4.3 3.7 4.6  3.5 4.2 3.6 4.4

All other office and general expenses

  14.1 15.7 14.6 15.6  15.4 16.5 14.9 16.0

Our office and general expense ratio, defined as office and general expenses as a percentage of revenue, decreased to 27.7%29.8% from 28.8%30.2% in the secondthird quarter of 2009 and to 29.3%29.5% from 30.2% in the first halfnine months of 2009 from the comparable prior-year periods. The improvement in the office and general expense ratio was driven by a reductionreductions in all keythe major expense categories listed in the table above, partially offset by lower revenue.

EXPENSES AND OTHER INCOME

   Three months ended
June 30,
  Six months ended
June 30,
 
   2009  2008  2009  2008 

Cash interest on debt obligations

  $(35.1 $(46.3 $(70.5 $(97.0

Non-cash interest

   (10.0  (6.7  (9.4  (13.7
                 

Interest expense

   (45.1  (53.0  (79.9  (110.7

Interest income

   8.1    23.0    20.4    51.7  
                 

Net interest expense

   (37.0  (30.0  (59.5  (59.0

Other (expense) income, net

   (23.3  6.3    (18.4  4.9  
                 

Total (expenses) and other income

  $(60.3 $(23.7 $(77.9 $(54.1
                 

Net Interest ExpenseRestructuring and Other Reorganization-Related (Reversals) Charges

For the threeRestructuring and six months ended June 30, 2009, cash interest expenseother reorganization-related charges of $3.9 and interest income decreased when compared to the respective prior-year periods primarily due to declining interest rates, mainly in the U.S., United Kingdom and Continental Europe. The change in non-cash interest expense$11.2 for the three and sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2009 compared2008, respectively, primarily relate to the respective prior-year periods wasrealignment of our global media operations into a result of changesnew management entity called Mediabrands in the valuesecond quarter of obligations to purchase noncontrolling equity shares of a consolidated subsidiary. See Note 102008. In addition, the charges for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 relate to the unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements for further information.restructuring program announced at Lowe during the third quarter of 2007. Net charges primarily consist of leasehold amortization and additional severance expense.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – (continued)

(Amounts in Millions, Except Per Share Amounts)

(Unaudited)

 

EXPENSES AND OTHER INCOME

   Three months ended
September 30,
  Nine months ended
September 30,
 
     2009      2008      2009      2008   

Cash interest on debt obligations

  $(34.9 $(45.8 $(105.4 $(142.8

Non-cash interest

   (2.9  (7.4  (12.3  (21.1
                 

Interest expense

   (37.8  (53.2  (117.7  (163.9

Interest income

   7.6    23.3    28.0    75.0  
                 

Net interest expense

   (30.2  (29.9  (89.7  (88.9

Other income (expense), net

   1.0    (1.0  (17.4  3.9  
                 

Total (expenses) and other income

  $(29.2 $(30.9 $(107.1 $(85.0
                 

Net Interest Expense

For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009, cash interest expense and interest income decreased when compared to the respective prior-year periods, primarily due to declining interest rates, mainly in the United Kingdom, Continental Europe and the U.S. The change in non-cash interest expense for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009 compared to the respective prior-year periods was primarily due to a decline in amortization of deferred warrant costs and debt issuance costs in connection with the expiration of our $750.0 Three-Year Credit Agreement, dated as of June 13, 2006 (the “2006 Credit Agreement”) in June 2009. Additionally, for the three months ended September 30, 2009, the decrease in non-cash interest expense was partially offset by changes in the value of obligations to purchase noncontrolling equity shares of consolidated subsidiaries. See Note 11 to the unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements for further information.

Other Income (Expense) Income,, net

Results of operations for the three and sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2009 and 2008 include certain items which are either non-recurring or are not directly associated with our revenue producing operations.

 

   Three months ended
June 30,
  Six months ended
June 30,
 
       2009          2008      2009  2008 

Loss on early extinguishment of debt 1

  $(24.6 $—    $(24.6 $—    

(Losses) gains on sales of businesses and investments

   (2.8  3.1   (2.8  3.6  

Vendor discounts and credit adjustments 2

   4.7    3.2   6.2    10.3  

Litigation settlement 3

   —      —     —      (12.0

Other (expense) income, net

   (0.6  —     2.8    3.0  
                 

Total other (expense) income, net

  $(23.3 $6.3  $(18.4 $4.9  
                 
   Three months ended
September 30,
  Nine months ended
September 30,
 
     2009      2008      2009      2008   

Loss on early extinguishment of debt1

  $(1.2 $   $(25.8 $  

Gains (losses) on sales of businesses and investments

   0.7    (0.1  (2.1  3.9  

Vendor discounts and credit adjustments2

   1.5    2.4    7.7    12.6  

Litigation settlement3

               (12.0

Other (expense) income, net

       (3.3  2.8    (0.6
                 

Total other income (expense), net

  $1.0   $(1.0 $(17.4 $3.9  
                 

 

1During the second quarter of 2009, we recorded a charge of $24.6 related to the early settlement of our tender offers for the 5.40% Notes due 2009 (the “2009 Notes”) and 7.25% Notes due 2011 (the “2011 Notes”). During the third quarter of 2009, we recorded a charge of $0.9 related to the final settlement of our tender offers for the 2009 Notes, 2011 Notes and Floating Rate Notes due 2010 (the “2010 Notes”), as well as a charge of $0.3 related to the redemption of all of our outstanding 2009 Notes. See Note 2 to the unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements for further information.
2We are in the process of settling our liabilities related to vendor discounts and credits established during the restatement we presented in our 2004 Restatement.Annual Report on Form 10-K. These adjustments reflect the reversal of certain of these liabilities as a result of settlements with clients or vendors or where the statute of limitations has lapsed.
3During May 2008, the SEC concluded its investigation that began in 2002 into our financial reporting practices, resulting in a settlement charge of $12.0.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – (continued)

(Amounts in Millions, Except Per Share Amounts)

(Unaudited)

INCOME TAXES

 

  Three months ended
June 30,
  Six months ended
June 30,
  Three months ended
September 30,
  Nine months ended
September 30,
  2009  2008  2009 2008    2009      2008      2009     2008  

Income (loss) before income taxes

  $36.6  $176.9  $(62.9 $88.7  $29.1  $85.4  $(33.8 $174.1
                        

Provision for (benefit of) income taxes

  $3.7  $79.1  $(21.7 $55.4  $3.7  $35.5  $(18.0 $90.9
                        

The effective tax rate for the secondthird quarter of 2009 is 10.1%12.7%, compared to 44.7%41.6% in the secondthird quarter of 2008, and for the first halfnine months of 2009 is 34.5%53.3%, compared to 62.5%52.2% in the first halfnine months of 2008. Our tax rates are affected by many factors, including our worldwide earnings from various countries, changes in legislation and tax characteristics of our income. Specifically, for the three and sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2009, the difference between the effective tax rate and the statutory rate of 35% is primarily due to the recognition of previously unrecognized tax benefits, the recognition of tax benefits on partially worthless securities, losses in certain foreign locations where we receive no tax benefit due to 100% valuation allowances and the establishment of valuation allowances in the Asia Pacific region. For the nine months ended September 30, 2009, the difference between the effective tax rate and the statutory tax rate is also due to the write-off of deferred tax assets related to restricted stock.

For the three months ended June 30, 2009, we recognized previously unrecognized tax benefits and related interest (net of federal benefit) of $23.4 related See Note 6 to the IRS appeals settlement regarding items of income and expense attributable to the 2004 Restatement. The $23.4 includes a decrease of $14.4 of gross unrecognized tax benefits resulting from tax positions taken in prior periods and a decrease of $15.1 of gross interest on unrecognized tax benefits.unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements for further information.

For the three and sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2008, the difference between the effective tax rate and the statutory rate of 35% is primarily due to state and local taxes, losses in certain foreign locations where we receive no tax benefit due to 100% valuation allowances and, for the sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2008, the SEC settlement provision for which we received no tax benefit. The difference was also due tobenefit and the release of valuation allowances during the three months ended June 30, 2008, in jurisdictions where we believed it was more likely than not that we will realize our deferred tax assets.

Segment Results of Operations – Three and SixNine Months Ended JuneSeptember 30, 2009 compared to Three and SixNine Months Ended JuneSeptember 30, 2008

As discussed in Note 910 to the unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements, we have two reportable segments as of JuneSeptember 30, 2009: IAN and Constituency Management Group (“CMG”). We also report results for the Corporate and other group.

IAN

REVENUE

      Components of change     Change 
   Three months
ended
September 30, 2008
  Foreign
currency
  Net
acquisitions/
(divestitures)
  Organic  Three months
ended
September 30, 2009
  Organic  Total 

Consolidated

  $1,450.1  $(59.2 $1.6   $(200.6 $1,191.9  (13.8%)  (17.8%) 

Domestic

   770.1       (0.3  (105.3  664.5  (13.7%)  (13.7%) 

International

   680.0   (59.2  1.9    (95.3  527.4  (14.0%)  (22.4%) 

During the third quarter of 2009, our revenue decreased by $258.2 compared to the third quarter of 2008, primarily consisting of an organic revenue decrease of $200.6 and an adverse foreign currency impact of $59.2. The organic revenue decrease was primarily driven by a pullback of existing client business throughout all agencies within IAN due to challenging economic conditions, most predominantly in the technology and telecom and auto and transportation sectors. The international organic decrease occurred throughout all regions, with the largest impact in Continental Europe and the United Kingdom.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – (continued)

(Amounts in Millions, Except Per Share Amounts)

(Unaudited)

      Components of change     Change 
   Nine months
ended
September 30, 2008
  Foreign
currency
  Net
acquisitions/
(divestitures)
  Organic  Nine months
ended
September 30, 2009
  Organic  Total 

Consolidated

  $4,229.7  $(263.0 $68.3  $(480.0 $3,555.0  (11.3%)  (16.0%) 

Domestic

   2,263.3       15.1   (279.9  1,998.5  (12.4%)  (11.7%) 

International

   1,966.4   (263.0  53.2   (200.1  1,556.5  (10.2%)  (20.8%) 

During the first nine months of 2009, our revenue decreased by $674.7 compared to the first nine months of 2008, primarily consisting of an organic revenue decrease of $480.0 and an adverse foreign currency impact of $263.0. The domestic and international organic decrease was driven by factors similar to those noted above for the third quarter of 2009.

SEGMENT OPERATING INCOME

   Three months ended
September 30,
  Nine months ended
September 30,
 
   2009  2008  Change  2009  2008  Change 

Segment operating income

  $78.7   $144.0   (45.3%)  $135.7   $344.5   (60.6%) 

Operating margin

   6.6  9.9   3.8  8.1 

Operating income decreased during the third quarter of 2009 when compared to the third quarter of 2008 due to a decrease in revenue of $258.2, partially offset by decreases in salaries and related expenses of $122.5 and office and general expenses of $70.4. The decrease in salaries and related expenses was primarily due to lower base salaries, benefits and temporary help related to work force actions taken during the fourth quarter of 2008 and during 2009 in response to the difficult economic conditions that began in the latter part of 2008. Incentive award expense was lower during the third quarter of 2009 consistent with the explanations provided in the consolidated Salaries and Related Expenses section. These reductions were partially offset by higher severance charges incurred for work force actions taken in the third quarter of 2009, which affected all regions, with the largest impact in the U.S. and Continental Europe. Lower office and general expenses were primarily due to cost containment measures that reduced discretionary expenses, primarily related to travel and entertainment and employment costs, as well as lower production expenses associated with reduced project work where we acted as principal.

Operating income decreased during the first nine months of 2009 when compared to the first nine months of 2008 due to a decrease in revenue of $674.7, partially offset by decreases in salaries and related expenses of $270.2 and office and general expenses of $195.7, driven by factors similar to those noted above for the third quarter of 2009.

CMG

REVENUE

      Components of change     Change 
   Three months
ended
September 30, 2008
  Foreign
currency
  Net
acquisitions/
(divestitures)
  Organic  Three months
ended
September 30, 2009
  Organic  Total 

Consolidated

  $289.9  $(8.8 $  $(46.3 $234.8  (16.0%)  (19.0%) 

Domestic

   193.7          (23.9  169.8  (12.3%)  (12.3%) 

International

   96.2   (8.8     (22.4  65.0  (23.3%)  (32.4%) 

During the third quarter of 2009, revenue decreased by $55.1 compared to the third quarter of 2008, consisting of an organic revenue decline of $46.3 and an adverse foreign currency impact of $8.8. The domestic and international organic revenue decreases were primarily due to the completion of several projects with existing clients in 2008 that did not recur or

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – (continued)

(Amounts in Millions, Except Per Share Amounts)

(Unaudited)

 

IAN

REVENUE

      Components of change     Change 
   Three months ended
June 30, 2008
  Foreign
currency
  Net
acquisitions/
(divestitures)
  Organic  Three months ended
June 30, 2009
  Organic  Total 

Consolidated

  $1,538.7  $(112.4 $35.1  $(213.2 $1,248.2  (13.9)%  (18.9)% 

Domestic

   801.1   —      8.0   (116.4  692.7  (14.5)%  (13.5)% 

International

   737.6   (112.4  27.1   (96.8  555.5  (13.1)%  (24.7)% 

During the second quarter of 2009, our revenue decreased by $290.5 compared to the second quarter of 2008, primarily consisting of an organic revenue decrease of $213.2 and an adverse foreign currency impact of $112.4. The domestic and international organic revenue decreases were primarily driven by a pullback of existing client business throughout all agencies within IAN, most predominantly in the technology and telecom and the auto and transportation sectors.

      Components of change     Change 
   Six months ended
June 30, 2008
  Foreign
currency
  Net
acquisitions/
(divestitures)
  Organic  Six months ended
June 30, 2009
  Organic  Total 

Consolidated

  $2,779.8  $(204.1 $66.7  $(279.3 $2,363.1  (10.0)%  (15.0)% 

Domestic

   1,493.3   —      15.4   (174.4  1,334.3  (11.7)%  (10.6)% 

International

   1,286.5   (204.1  51.3   (104.9  1,028.8  (8.2)%  (20.0)% 

During the first half of 2009, our revenue decreased by $416.7 compared to the first half of 2008, primarily consisting of organic decrease of $279.3 and an adverse foreign currency impact of $204.1. The domestic and international organic decrease was driven by factors similar to those noted above for the second quarter of 2009.

SEGMENT OPERATING INCOME

   Three months ended June 30,  Six months ended June 30, 
       2009          2008      Change      2009      2008    Change 

Segment operating income

  $114.5   $220.6   (48.1)%  $57.0   $200.8   (71.6)% 

Operating margin

   9.2  14.3   2.4  7.2 

Operating income decreased during the second quarter of 2009 when compared to the second quarter of 2008 due to a decrease in revenue of $290.5, partially offset by decreases in salaries and related expenses of $107.0 and office and general expenses of $77.4. The decrease in salaries and related expenses was due to lower base salaries, benefits and temporary help related to measures we have taken to realign our businesses because of the difficult economic conditions that began in the later part of 2008 and through second quarter of 2009. This was partially offset in part by higher severance charges in the second quarter of 2009, spread across all agencies and regions with the largest impact in the Continental Europe and U.S. regions, mainly at McCann. In addition, the decrease in salaries and related expenses was due to a reduction in incentive awards during the second quarter of 2009 consistent with explanations provided in the consolidated Salaries and Related Expenses section. Lower office and general expenses were primarily due to lower production expenses and reduced discretionary expenses, largely related to travel and entertainment.

Operating income decreased during the first half of 2009 when compared to the first half of 2008 due to a decrease in revenue of $416.7, partially offset by decreases in salaries and related expenses of $147.7 and office and general expenses of $125.2 and were driven by factors similar to those noted above for the second quarter of 2009.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – (continued)

(Amounts in Millions, Except Per Share Amounts)

(Unaudited)

CMG

REVENUE

      Components of change     Change 
   Three months ended
June 30, 2008
  Foreign
currency
  Net
acquisitions/
(divestitures)
  Organic  Three months ended
June 30, 2009
  Organic  Total 

Consolidated

  $297.0  $(17.9 $—    $(52.9 $226.2  (17.8)%  (23.8)% 

Domestic

   189.9   —      —     (35.5  154.4  (18.7)%  (18.7)% 

International

   107.1   (17.9  —     (17.4  71.8  (16.2)%  (33.0)% 

During the second quarter of 2009, revenue decreased by $70.8 compared to the second quarter of 2008, consisting of an organic revenue decline of $52.9 and an adverse foreign currency impact of $17.9. The domestic and international organic revenue decreases were primarily due to the completion of several projects with existing clients in 2008 that did not recur or were substantially curtailed in the secondthird quarter of 2009 in our events marketing business in addition toand the pullback of existing client business in certain of our events marketing, public relations and branding businesses due to broader economic difficulties. The international organic decrease occurred throughout all regions of the world, primarily in the United Kingdom China and Australia.the Asia Pacific region. Revenues in the events marketing business can fluctuate due to timing of completed projects where we act as principal, as revenue is typically recognized when the project is complete.

 

     Components of change    Change      Components of change    Change 
  Six months ended
June 30, 2008
  Foreign
currency
 Net
acquisitions/
(divestitures)
  Organic Six months ended
June 30, 2009
  Organic Total   Nine months
ended
September 30, 2008
  Foreign
currency
 Net
acquisitions/
(divestitures)
  Organic Nine months
ended
September 30, 2009
  Organic Total 

Consolidated

  $541.1  $(34.2 $—    $(70.3 $436.6  (13.0)%  (19.3)%   $831.2  $(43.2 $  $(116.6 $671.4  (14.0%)  (19.2%) 

Domestic

   346.8   —      —     (52.6  294.2  (15.2)%  (15.2)%    540.5          (76.4  464.1  (14.1%)  (14.1%) 

International

   194.3   (34.2  —     (17.7  142.4  (9.1)%  (26.7)%    290.7   (43.2     (40.2  207.3  (13.8%)  (28.7%) 

During the first halfnine months of 2009, revenue decreased by $104.5$159.8 compared to the first halfnine months of 2008, consisting of an organic revenue decrease of $70.3$116.6 and an adverse foreign currency impact of $34.2$43.2, and was driven by factors similar to those noted above for the secondthird quarter of 2009.

SEGMENT OPERATING INCOME

 

  Three months ended
June 30,
 Six months ended
June 30,
   Three months ended
September 30,
 Nine months ended
September 30,
 
      2009         2008     Change     2009     2008 Change   2009 2008 Change 2009 2008 Change 

Segment operating income

  $20.8   $25.5   (18.4)%  $25.3   $32.2   (21.4)%   $18.2   $23.8   (23.5%)  $43.5   $56.2   (22.6%) 

Operating margin

   9.2  8.6   5.8  6.0    7.8  8.2   6.5  6.8 

Operating income decreased during the secondthird quarter of 2009 when compared to the secondthird quarter of 2008 due to a decrease in revenue of $70.8,$55.1, partially offset by a decrease in office and general expenses of $42.7$27.6 and salaries and related expenses of $23.4.$21.9. Office and general expenses decreased primarily due to lower production expenses in the events marketing business.business and, to a lesser extent, reductions in certain discretionary expenses. Salaries and related expenses decreased primarily due to a decrease in base salaries, benefits and temporary help of $18.4$18.3 as a result of lower headcount from significant severance actions that occurred in the fourth quarter of 2008 due to a reduction in revenue, primarily in the events marketing and branding businesses.actions.

Operating income decreased during the first halfnine months of 2009 when compared to the first halfnine months of 2008 due to a decrease in revenue of $104.5,$159.8, partially offset by decreases in office and general expenses of $55.1$82.7 and salaries and related expenses of $42.5$64.4, and were driven by factors similar to those noted above for the secondthird quarter of 2009.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – (continued)

(Amounts in Millions, Except Per Share Amounts)

(Unaudited)

CORPORATE AND OTHER

Certain corporate and other charges are reported as a separate line item within total segment operating income and include corporate office expenses and shared service center expenses, as well as certain other centrally managed expenses that are not fully allocated to operating divisions. Salaries and related expenses include salaries, long-term incentives, bonus and other miscellaneous benefits for corporate office employees. Office and general expenses primarily include professional fees related to internal control compliance, financial statement audits and legal, information technology and other consulting services, which are engaged and managed through the corporate office. In addition, office and general expenses also include rental expense and depreciation of leasehold improvements for properties occupied by corporate office employees. A portion of these expenses are allocated to operating divisions based on a formula that uses the planned revenues of each of the operating units. Amounts allocated also include specific charges for information technology-related projects, which are allocated based on utilization.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – (continued)

(Amounts in Millions, Except Per Share Amounts)

(Unaudited)

Corporate and other expenses for the secondthird quarter of 2009 decreased by $3.0$8.5 to $38.4$39.1 compared to the secondthird quarter of 2008, primarily due to lower annuallong-term incentive award expense relatedand the impact of unfavorable foreign currency changes on certain balance sheet items in the third quarter of 2008 that did not recur in the current year. The reduction in long-term incentive award expense primarily relates to changes in our assumptions on achieving certain performance targets. For the first halfnine months of 2009, corporate and other expenses decreased by $15.4$23.8 to $67.5$106.6 compared to the first halfnine months of 2008, primarily due to lower annual incentive award expense, as noted above for the second quarterimpact of 2009 as well as reductions in expected long-term incentive award expenseforeign currency changes and reductions in professional fees. The decreasechanges in incentive award expense and foreign currency changes are similar to those noted above for the third quarter of 2009. The decline in professional fees is primarily due to reduced external audit and legal fees.

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

CASH FLOW OVERVIEW

Our key liquidity metrics are operating cash flow and changes in working capital. The following tables summarize key financial data relating to our liquidity, capital resources and uses of capital.

 

  Six months ended
June 30,
  
  2009 2008    Nine months ended
September 30,
  

Cash Flow Data

      2009 2008  

Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities

  $(323.4 $111.9     $(198.5 $146.1   

Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities

   96.7    (84.7    47.3    (198.3 

Net cash used in financing activities

   (150.0  (239.0    (262.6  (263.1 

Working capital usage (included in operating activities)

  $(373.2 $(57.6   $(327.2 $(159.2 
  June 30,
2009
 December 31,
2008
 June 30,
2008

Balance Sheet Data

      September 30,
2009
 December 31,
2008
 September 30,
2008

Cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities

  $1,771.4   $2,274.9   $1,856.0  $1,772.1   $2,274.9   $1,707.6

Short-term debt

  $137.3   $332.8   $91.8  $88.2   $332.8   $81.9

Long-term debt

   1,901.1    1,786.9    2,045.8   1,866.9    1,786.9    2,043.1
                  

Total debt

  $2,038.4   $2,119.7   $2,137.6  $1,955.1   $2,119.7   $2,125.0
                  

Cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities decreased by $503.5$502.8 during the first halfnine months of 2009.

Operating Activities

Cash used in operating activities during the first halfnine months of 2009 increased by $435.3$344.6 as compared to the first halfnine months of 2008, primarily the result of an increased use of working capital of $315.6.$168.0. Net cash used in operating activities in the first halfnine months of 2009 primarily reflects net loss of $42.2$16.3 and working capital usage of $373.2,$327.2, partially offset by net adjustments to reconcile net loss of $217.0. Net adjustments to reconcile net loss primarily include depreciation and amortization of fixed assets and intangible assets, deferred income tax benefits, amortization of restricted stock and other non-cash expense items

Management’s Discussioncompensation and Analysisthe loss on early extinguishment of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – (continued)

(Amounts in Millions, Except Per Share Amounts)

(Unaudited)

of $136.0.debt. Cash generated or used by working capital reflects changes in accounts receivable, expenditures billable to clients, prepaid expenses and other current assets, accounts payable and accrued liabilities. In the first halfnine months of 2009 we used working capital of $373.2$327.2 compared to a use of working capital of $57.6$159.2 in the first halfnine months of 2008. The changeincrease in working capital usage is primarily due to the combined effect of strong growth in the latter part of 2008 at certain of our businesses and decreases in client spending due to economic conditions in the first halfnine months of 2009, partially offset by improvements in working capital management at certain of our businesses. Net non-cash expense items primarily include depreciation and amortization of fixed assets and intangible assets, deferred income tax benefits, amortization of restricted stock and other non-cash compensation and the loss on early extinguishment of debt.

The timing of media buying on behalf of our clients affects our working capital and operating cash flow. In most of our businesses, our agencies enter into commitments to pay production costs and media costs on behalf of clients. To the extent

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – (continued)

(Amounts in Millions, Except Per Share Amounts)

(Unaudited)

possible we pay production and media charges after we have received funds from our clients. The amounts involved substantially exceed our revenues, and primarily affect the level of accounts receivable, expenditures billable to clients, accounts payable and accrued media and production liabilities. Our assets include both cash received and accounts receivable from clients for these pass-through arrangements, while our liabilities include amounts owed on behalf of clients to media and production suppliers.

Our accrued liabilities are also affected by the timing of certain other payments. For example, while cash incentive awards are accrued throughout the year, they are generally paid during the first quarter of the subsequent year.

Investing Activities

Cash provided by investing activities during the first halfnine months of 2009 includes net sales and maturities of short-term marketable securities partially offset by deferred payments on prior acquisitions and capital expenditures. Net sales and maturities of short-term marketable securities of $157.4$157.9 primarily relates to a redemption of a time deposit.

Financing Activities

Cash used in financing activities during the first halfnine months of 2009 reflects proceeds, uses and fees related to our debt transactions. In the second quarter of 2009 weWe issued $600.0 in aggregate principal amount of our 2017 Notes at 97.958% of par and incurred related debt issuance costs. During the second quarter of 2009 weWe settled tenders of our 2009 Notes, 2011 Notes and 20112010 Notes. As a result, we paid cash of $698.3,$734.7, which includes early tender premiums, to purchase $213.9$214.0 aggregate principal amount of the 2009 Notes, and $463.7 aggregate principal amount of the 2011 Notes and $36.3 aggregate principal amount of the 2010 Notes. Additionally, during the third quarter of 2009, we paid $36.0 of cash to redeem the remaining $36.0 aggregate principal amount of the 2009 Notes. Total net cash used related to the second quarter of 2009these debt transactions, including issuance costs and discounts, was $126.4.$202.2.

Additionally, cash used in financing activities reflects distributions to noncontrolling interests of $17.4$21.1 and dividend payments of $13.8$20.7 on our Series B Preferred Stock.

Foreign Exchange Rate Changes

The effect of foreign exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents included in the unaudited Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows resulted in an increase of $30.0$68.1 during the sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2009. This increase primarily reflects the strengthening of the Euro against the U.S. Dollar during this period, with the largest impact occurring in the second quarter of 2009.period.

LIQUIDITY OUTLOOK

Based on our cash flow forecasts we expect our cash flow from operations, cash and cash equivalents to be sufficient to meet our anticipated operating requirements at a minimum for the next twelve months. In addition, we have a committed credit facility available to support our operating needs. Our policy is to maintain a conservative approach to liquidity, which

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – (continued)

(Amounts in Millions, Except Per Share Amounts)

(Unaudited)

we believe is appropriate for our Company in view of the current conditions in the economy and financial markets.economy. As a result, we are closely managing our spending and will defer or limit discretionary spending where possible, while continuing to position ourselves for growth in the future.

InThe difficult global economic conditions have made business conditions extremely challenging for us during the first halfnine months of 2009, the global economy was in a recession, which is expectedand should market conditions continue to persist through the second halfadversely affect our clients, it could continue to challenge our level of the year.cash generation from operations. Economic conditions have caused a decrease in demand for advertising and marketing services, which led to a decrease in our revenue during the first halfnine months of 2009. Should market conditions continue to adversely affect our clients, it could continue to challenge our level of cash generation from operations. We have accounts receivable related to revenues earned and for pass-through costs incurred on behalf of our clients as well as expenditures billable to clients related to costs incurred and fees earned that have not yet been billed. Although we have not experienced a material increase in client defaults, current market conditions increase the likelihood that we could experience future losses. GMGeneral

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – (continued)

(Amounts in Millions, Except Per Share Amounts)

(Unaudited)

Motors Corporation (“GM”) and certain of its U.S. affiliates filed voluntary petitions for relief under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code on June 1, 2009, and completed their reorganization in July. We did not incur any charges related to outstanding amounts due from GM during the second quarterfirst nine months of 2009. Although GM’s bankruptcy proceedings have not been fully resolved, we do not expect to incur any material GM-related charges in the future.

We maintain a committed corporate credit facility to increase our financial flexibility. We have not drawn on any of our corporate credit facilities since 2003, although we use them to issue letters of credit primarily to support commitments on behalf of certain clients. Our $750.0 three-year credit agreement (the “20062006 Credit Agreement”)Agreement expired in June 2009. Prior to the expiration of our 2006 Credit Agreement, we replaced a portion of this facility in July of 2008 with our $335.0 Three-Year Credit Agreement (the “2008 Credit Agreement”), and we do not currently plan on replacing the full amount. The outstanding letters of credit under the 2006 Credit Agreement were replaced with letters of credit issued under the 2008 Credit Agreement in the second quarter of 2009. The 2008 Credit Agreement includes commitments from a syndicate of financial institutions, and if any of the financial institutions in the syndicate were unable to perform and no other bank assumed that institution’s commitment, the total size of the facility would be reduced by the size of that institution’s commitment. Additionally, during the second quarter of 2009 we amended the terms of our 2008 Credit Agreement to improve our financial flexibility.

We recently took measures to improve our debt profile. See “Financing and Sources of Funds” below and Note 2 to the unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements for further information. If, however, our business is adversely impacted by further deterioration in the economic environment, it could lead us to seek new or additional sources of liquidity to fund our working capital needs or enhance our financial flexibility. Our ability to access the capital markets depends on a number of factors, which include those specific to us, such as our credit rating, and those related to the capital markets, such as the amount or terms of available credit. From time to time we evaluate market conditions and financing alternatives for opportunities to raise additional financing or otherwise improve our liquidity profile and enhance our financial flexibility. There can be no guarantee that we would be able to access new sources of liquidity on commercially reasonable terms.

Funding Requirements

Our most significant funding requirements include: our operations, non-cancelable operating lease obligations, acquisitions, capital expenditures, payments related to vendor discounts and credits, debt service, preferred stock dividends, contributions to pension and postretirement plans and taxes. Additionally, we may be required to make payments to minority owners if certain put options related to prior acquisitions are exercised. In any twelve-month period, we maintain substantial flexibility over significant uses of cash, including our capital expenditures and cash used for new acquisitions. Notable funding requirements include:

 

Debt service – The remaining aggregate principal amount of $36.0$213.7 related to our 20092010 Notes willexpect to be settled with available cash upon maturity on November 15, 2009.2010. The remainder of our debt is primarily long-term, with maturities scheduled from 20102011 to 2023.

 

Acquisitions – During the twelvefirst nine months ended December 31,of 2009 we estimate paying approximately $68.0paid $64.2 of deferred payments related to acquisitions completed in previous years, of whichand we paidexpect to pay approximately $25.0$3.0 in the first halffourth quarter of 2009.2009 and approximately $20.0 in 2010. We also expect to continue to evaluate potential new strategic acquisitions.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – (continued)

(Amounts in Millions, Except Per Share Amounts)

(Unaudited)

 

Contributions to pension and postretirement plans – Our funding policy regarding our pension plan is to contribute amounts necessary to satisfy minimum pension funding requirements plus such additional amounts from time to time as determined to be appropriate to improve the plans’ funded status. For the three and sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2009, we made contributions of $5.1$7.5 and $14.1,$21.6, respectively, to our foreign pension plans and no contributions to ourthe domestic pension plans.plans were negligible. For the remainder of 2009, we expect to contribute approximately $12.0$6.0 to our foreign pension plans and approximately $5.0make no contributions to our domestic pension plans.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – (continued)

(Amounts in Millions, Except Per Share Amounts)

(Unaudited)

 

Payments related to vendor discounts and credits – Of the liabilities recognized as part of the 2004 Restatement, we estimate that we will pay approximately $20.0 primarily related to vendor discounts and credits over the next twelve months. As of June 30, 2009, our liability balance for these payments was $124.4.

FINANCING AND SOURCES OF FUNDS

Substantially all of our operating cash flow is generated by our agencies. Our cash balances are held in numerous locations throughout the world, primarily at the holding company level and at our largest subsidiaries. Below is a summary of our sources of liquidity.

 

  June 30, 2009  September 30, 2009
  Total
Facility
  Amount
Outstanding
  Letters
of Credit
 Total
Available
  Total
Facility
  Amount
Outstanding
  Letters
of Credit 1
  Total
Available

Cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities

       $1,771.4        $1,772.1

Committed

               

2008 Credit Agreement

  $335.0  $—    $92.81  $242.2  $335.0  $  $94.1  $240.9

Uncommitted

         $400.3  $85.0  $0.8  $314.5

Non-U.S.

  $400.0  $97.9  $0.8   $301.3

 

1We are required from time to time to post letters of credit, primarily to support our commitments, or those of our subsidiaries, primarily to purchase media placements, mostly in locations outside the U.S., or to satisfy other obligations. These letters of credit have historically not been drawn upon.

The following are recent debt actions that have impacted our liquidity:

Long-Term Debt

 

On June 8, 2009, we launched tender offers to purchase, for cash, (i) any and all of our $250.0 2009 Notes and (ii) up to $500.0 in aggregate principal amount of our outstanding 2011 Notes and 2010 Notes. The $500.0 maximum aggregate principal amount was first applied towards the purchase of all of the tendered 2011 Notes and then towards the purchase of the 2010 Notes on a pro-rated basis.

 

On June 15, 2009, we issued $600.0 in aggregate principal amount of 2017 Notes at 97.958% of par through a private placement.par. The net proceeds were approximately $572.0 after deducting discounts, commissions and offering expenses. We used the proceeds of the 2017 Notes to fund our tender offer to purchase up to $500.0 aggregate principal amount of outstanding 2011 Notes and 2010 Notes.

 

On June 22, 2009, we settled our early tenders of the 2009 Notes and the 2011 Notes. We purchased $213.9 aggregate principal amount of the 2009 Notes using cash on hand and $463.7 aggregate principal amount of the 2011 Notes. Cash paid to purchase the early tendered 2009 Notes and 2011 Notes, including accrued and unpaid interest, was $711.4.

 

On July 7, 2009, we settled tenders for the 2009 Notes, 2011 Notes and 2010 Notes that had not been settled at the early settlement date. We purchased less than $0.1 additional aggregate principal amount of the 2009 Notes and 2011 Notes, as well as $36.3 aggregate principal amount of the 2010 Notes. Cash paid to purchase the 2009 Notes and the 2011 Notes that were tendered during the final tender period and the 2010 Notes that were accepted for purchase, including accrued and unpaid interest, was $36.5.

In July and August of 2009 we entered into a series of interest rate swap agreements related to our 6.25% Senior Unsecured Notes due 2014 (the “6.25% Notes”). These swap agreements convert $250.0 notional amount of our $350.0 6.25% Notes from fixed rate to floating rate debt. Please refer to Note 2 in our unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information.

On September 14, 2009, we redeemed all of our 2009 Notes that remained outstanding and that were scheduled to mature on November 15, 2009. Cash paid to redeem the $36.0 aggregate principal amount of the 2009 Notes, including accrued and unpaid interest, was $37.0.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – (continued)

(Amounts in Millions, Except Per Share Amounts)

(Unaudited)

 

On July 16 and 21, 2009, our interest rate swap agreements related to our 6.25% Senior Unsecured Notes due 2014 (the “6.25% Notes”) became effective. These swap agreements economically convert $100.0 notional amount of our $350.0 6.25% Notes from fixed rate to floating rate debt. Please refer to Note 2 in our unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information.

Credit Facilities

The 2008 Credit Agreement is a revolving facility expiring July 18, 2011, under which amounts borrowed by us or any of our subsidiaries designated under the 2008 Credit Agreement may be repaid and reborrowed, subject to an aggregate lending limit of $335.0 or the equivalent in other currencies, and the aggregate available amount of letters of credit outstanding may decrease or increase, subject to a limit on letters of credit of $200.0 or the equivalent in other currencies. Our obligations under the 2008 Credit Agreement are unsecured.

 

On May 13, 2009, we entered into Amendment No. 1 to the 2008 Credit Agreement to preserve our ability to use the 2008 Credit Agreement in the event of any bankruptcy or related event with respect to GM and/or any of its affiliates. Amendment No. 1 modifies the definition of EBITDAearnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (“EBITDA”) under the 2008 Credit Agreement to exclude from the determination of consolidated EBITDA any effects arising from any bankruptcy or other adverse event with respect to GM and/or any of its affiliates, limited to an aggregate amount of $150.0 of cash charges and an aggregate amount of $100.0 of non-cash charges. We did not incur any cash or non-cash charges related to GM during the second quarter of 2009.

 

On June 5, 2009, we entered into Amendment No. 2 to the 2008 Credit Agreement to modify certain terms of the financial covenants. As of the end of each fiscal quarter, we will be required to maintain an (i) an interest coverage ratio (EBITDA to net interest expense plus cash dividends on convertible preferred stock) for the four quarters then ended of not less than 3.75 to 1, (ii) a leverage ratio (debt as of such date to EBITDA) for the four quarters then ended of not greater than 3.25 to 1, and (iii) minimum EBITDA for the four quarters then ended of not less than $550.0 through June 30, 2010 and $600.0 thereafter.

 

On June 15, 2009, our 2006 Credit Agreement expired and as of the expiration date, there was no outstanding principal. In connection with the 2006 Credit Agreement we issued 67.9 warrants, consisting of 29.1 capped warrants and 38.8 uncapped warrants with a stated exercise date of June 15, 2009. Based on the market price of our common stock and stated exercise prices of the warrants, we dodid not expect we will have to paymake any cash payments or issue any common stock to settle the warrants. See Note 2 to the unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements for further information.

The 2008 Credit Agreement includes restrictive covenants and financial covenants, and as of JuneSeptember 30, 2009, we were in compliance with all applicable covenants, as seen in the table below.

 

Covenants

  Four Quarters Ended
June 30, 2009
  

EBITDA Reconciliation

  Four Quarters Ended
June 30, 2009
 Four Quarters Ended
September 30, 2009
    

EBITDA Reconciliation

 Four Quarters Ended
September 30, 2009

Interest coverage ratio (not less than)

   3.75x  Operating income  $461.8  3.75x    Operating income $404.0

Actual Interest Coverage Ratio

   5.20x  Add:  

Actual interest coverage ratio

  4.63x    Add: 
          
    Depreciation and amortization   233.3     Depreciation and amortization  222.7

Leverage ratio (not greater than)

   3.25x  Non-cash charges   0.2  3.25x    Non-cash charges  0.2
              

Actual leverage ratio

   2.93x  EBITDA  $695.3  3.12x    EBITDA $626.9
           

EBITDA (not less than)

  $550.0     $550.0     

Actual EBITDA

  $695.3     $626.9     

If we believed we would not be able to comply with these financial covenants in the future, we would seek an amendment and/or waiver from our lenders, but there is no assurance that our lenders would grant an amendment or waiver. If we do not comply with these financial covenants and are unable to obtain the necessary amendment or waiver, the 2008 Credit Agreement could be terminated and our lenders could accelerate payments of any outstanding principal. In addition, under those circumstances we could be required to deposit funds with one of our lenders in an amount equal to any outstanding letters of credit. As of September 30, 2009, there was no outstanding principal and $94.1 in outstanding letters of credit.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – (continued)

(Amounts in Millions, Except Per Share Amounts)

(Unaudited)

 

circumstances we could be required to deposit funds with one of our lenders in an amount equal to any outstanding letters of credit. As of June 30, 2009, there was no outstanding principal and $92.8 in outstanding letters of credit.

We also have uncommitted credit facilities with various banks that permit borrowings at variable interest rates. We use our uncommitted credit lines for working capital needs at some of our operations outside the U.S., and the amount outstanding as of JuneSeptember 30, 2009 was $97.9.$85.0. We have guaranteed the repayment of some of these borrowings made by certain subsidiaries. If we lose access to these credit lines we would have to provide funding directly to some of our international operations. The weighted-average interest rate on outstanding balances under the uncommitted credit facilities as of JuneSeptember 30, 2009 was approximately 1%.

We aggregate our net domestic cash position on a daily basis. Outside the U.S. we use cash pooling arrangements with banks to help manage our liquidity requirements. In these pooling arrangements, several Interpublic agencies agree with a single bank that the cash balances of any of the agencies with the bank will be subject to a full right of setoff against amounts the other agencies owe the bank, and the bank provides for overdrafts as long as the net balance for all the agencies does not exceed an agreed-upon level. Typically, each agency pays interest on outstanding overdrafts and receives interest on cash balances. Our unaudited Consolidated Balance Sheets reflect cash, net of overdrafts, under all of our pooling arrangements, and as of JuneSeptember 30, 2009, the amount netted was $939.3.

DEBT RATINGS

Our long-term debt credit ratings as of July 17,October 16, 2009 were as follows.is listed below.

 

   Moody’s Investor
Service
  Standard and
Poor’s
  Fitch Ratings

Rating

  Ba3  B+  BB+

Outlook

  Positive  Stable  Positive

The most recent change in our credit ratings occurred on March 5, 2009 when Standard and Poor’s changed our outlook from positive to stable. A credit rating is not a recommendation to buy, sell or hold securities and may be subject to revision or withdrawal at any time by the assigning credit rating agency. The rating of each credit rating agency should be evaluated independently of any other rating.

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING ESTIMATES

Our significant accounting policies are described in Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for the year ended December 31, 2008 included in our 2008 Annual Report on Form 10-K as filed on February 27, 2009 and our Form 8-K dated as of June 8, 2009. As summarized in Item 7,Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, in our annual report,Annual Report, we believe that certain of these policies are critical because they are important to the presentation of our financial condition and results of operations and they require management’s most difficult, subjective or complex judgments, often as a result of the need to estimate the effect of matters that are inherently uncertain. These critical estimates relate to revenue recognition, income taxes, goodwill and other intangible assets, and pension and postretirement benefits. We base our estimates on historical experience and on other factors that we consider reasonable under the circumstances. Estimation methodologies are applied consistently from year to year, and there have been no significant changes in the application of critical accounting estimates since December 31, 2008. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.

Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets

We review goodwill and other intangible assets with indefinite lives not subject to amortization as of October 1st each year or whenever events or significant changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable. The deterioration of global economic conditions has adversely affected the demand for advertising and marketing services in 2009, which has presented a challenge in meeting the revenue and profit growth projections for certain of our reporting units. As a result of our review of updated projected operating results for 2009, we determined that the projected decrease in profitability for 2009 of five of our reporting units was an event that “more likely than not” could reduce the fair value of

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – (continued)

(Amounts in Millions, Except Per Share Amounts)

(Unaudited)

each of these reporting units below its carrying value. As the fair value of these reporting units did not exceed their carrying value by a substantial margin during our last annual test as of October 1, 2008, we assessed the recoverability of goodwill at these reporting units as of August 31, 2009.

In determining the fair value of our tested reporting units, we used a combination of the income approach, which incorporates the use of the discounted cash flow method, and the market approach, which incorporates the use of earnings and revenue multiples based on market data. We have applied more weight to the income approach as the market approach is still affected by the challenging economic environment. For the income approach, we used projections, which require the use of significant estimates and assumptions for each reporting unit as to matters such as revenue growth, profit margins, terminal value growth rates, capital expenditures, assumed tax rates and discount rates. For the market approach, we used judgment in identifying the relevant comparable company market multiples. These estimates and assumptions vary between each reporting unit depending on the facts and circumstances specific to that unit. The discount rate for each reporting unit is influenced by general market conditions as well as factors specific to the reporting unit. The discount rates we used for our reporting units for the interim test were between 11.5% and 15.0%. We believe that the estimates and assumptions we made are reasonable, but they are susceptible to change from period to period. Actual results of operations, cash flows and other factors will likely differ from the estimates used in our valuation, and it is possible that differences and changes could be material.

We have performed a sensitivity analysis to detail the impact that changes in assumptions may have on the outcome of the first step of the impairment test. Our sensitivity analysis provides a range of fair value for each reporting unit, where the low end of the range reduces growth rates by 0.5% and increases discount rates by 0.5% and the high end of the range increases growth rates by 0.5% and decreases discount rates by 0.5%. For purposes of our comparison between carrying value and fair value for the first step of the impairment test, we use the average of our fair values.

Using the average fair value, the individual fair values of the five reporting units that were tested were greater than their carrying values and no impairment charge was necessary in the third quarter of 2009. The excess fair value, when compared to the respective carrying value, was not greater than 10% for each of our five tested reporting units. The related goodwill associated with these reporting units was approximately $570.0 as of the testing date.

We perform our annual impairment review as of October 1, 2009, in which we will review our financial projections and assumptions in estimating fair value at all of our reporting units, including the five reporting units tested during the third quarter. Additional deterioration in profitability and continued adverse market conditions could have a significant impact on the estimated fair value of our reporting units, which could result in an impairment charge in the fourth quarter of 2009.

RECENT ACCOUNTING STANDARDS

Please refer to Note 1213 to the unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements for a discussion of certain accounting standards that have been adopted during 2009 and certain accounting standards which we have not yet been required to implement and may be applicable to our future operations.

Item 3.Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

There has been no significant change in our exposure to market risk during the sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2009. Our exposure to market risk for changes in interest rates relates primarily to our debt obligations. As of JuneSeptember 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, approximately 82% and 84%, respectively, of our debt obligations bore interest at fixed interest rates. We have used interest rate swaps to manage the mix of our fixed and floating rate debt obligations, but, asand, in the third quarter of June 30, 2009 we have none outstanding. Subsequently, in July, 2009, we entered into interest rate swap agreements that economically convert $100.0$250.0 million notional amount of our $350.0 million 6.25% Notes from fixed rate to floating rate debt. We enter into interest rate swaps for risk management purposes, and not for speculative purposes, to manage our exposure to changes in interest rates and to maintain an appropriate mix of fixed and floating rate debt. See Note 2 into the unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements for more information. We are not dependent on short-term funding, and the uncertainty in the credit market has not materially impacted our funding costs. Our pension plan assets are also exposed to market risk. As a result of the market decline in 2008, theThe fair value of our pension plan assets have declined,may appreciate or depreciate during the year and if unchanged, couldcan result in lower or higher pension expense and funding requirements in future periods. For a further discussion of our exposure to market risk, refer to Item 7A,Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk, in our 2008 Annual Report on Form 10-K as filed on February 27, 2009. For further discussion regarding current economic conditions, see the Executive Summary and Liquidity and Capital Resources sections in Item 2,Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Conditions and Results of Operations.

 

Item 4.Controls and Procedures

Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Our management, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”)) as of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. Based on such evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that, as of JuneSeptember 30, 2009, the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed in reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in Securities and Exchange Commission rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures.

There are inherent limitations to the effectiveness of any system of disclosure controls and procedures, including the possibility of human error and the circumvention or overriding of the controls and procedures. Accordingly, even effective disclosure controls and procedures can only provide reasonable assurance of achieving their control objectives.

Changes in internal control over financial reporting

There has been no change in internal control over financial reporting in the quarter ended JuneSeptember 30, 2009 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

PART II OTHER INFORMATION

 

Item 1.Legal Proceedings

Information about our other current legal proceedings is set forth in Note 1112 to the unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements included in this report.Quarterly Report.

 

Item 1A.Risk Factors

In the secondthird quarter of 2009, there have been no material changes in the risk factors we have previously disclosed in Item 1A, Risk Factors, in our 2008 Annual Report on Form 10-K as filed on February 27, 2009.

 

Item 2.Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

 

 (c)The following table provides information regarding our purchases of our equity securities during the period from AprilJuly 1, 2009 to JuneSeptember 30, 2009:

 

   Total Number of
Shares (or Units)
Purchased
  Average Price
Paid per Share
(or Unit) 2
  Total Number of Shares
(or Units) Purchased as
Part of Publicly
Announced Plans
or Programs
  Maximum
Number (or
Approximate
Dollar Value) of
Shares (or Units)
that May Yet Be
Purchased Under
the Plans or
Programs

April 1-30

  0 shares  $0.00  —    —  

May 1-31

  2,074 shares  $5.10  —    —  

June 1-30

  1,900,212 shares  $5.71  —    —  
             

Total 1

  1,902,286 shares  $5.71  —    —  
   Total Number of
Shares (or Units)
Purchased
  Average Price
Paid per Share
(or Unit) 2
  Total Number of Shares
(or Units) Purchased as
Part of Publicly
Announced Plans
or Programs
  Maximum
Number (or
Approximate
Dollar Value) of
Shares (or Units)
that May Yet Be
Purchased Under
the Plans or
Programs

July 1-31

  6,627 shares  $4.76    

August 1-31

  50,715 shares  $5.55    

September 1-30

  41,045 shares  $6.97    
         

Total1

  98,387 shares  $6.09    

 

1Consists of restricted shares of our common stock, par value $0.10 per share, withheld under the terms of grants under employee stock-based compensation plans to offset tax withholding obligations that occurred upon vesting and release of restricted shares during each month of the secondthird quarter of 2009 (the “Withheld Shares”).
2The average price per month of the Withheld Shares was calculated by dividing the aggregate value of the tax withholding obligations for each month by the aggregate number of shares of common stock withheld each month.

Working Capital Restrictions and Other Limitations on the Payment of Dividends

The 2008 Credit Agreement contains certain covenants that, among other things, and subject to certain exceptions, restrict us from making cash acquisitions, making capital expenditures, repurchasing our common stock and declaring or paying cash dividends on our common stock, in excess of an aggregate amount of $600.0 million in any fiscal year. If we maintain a leverage ratio not greater than 2.75 to 1 at the end of any fiscal year, we may carry forward to the next fiscal year unused amounts of up to $200.0 million of the $600.0 million. If our leverage ratio is greater than 2.75 to 1 at the end of any fiscal year, we may not carry forward unused amounts, and cash common stock dividends and net share repurchases not otherwise permitted will be restricted to $400.0 million for the next fiscal year. In addition, the terms of our outstanding series of preferred stock do not permit us to pay dividends on our common stock unless all accumulated and unpaid dividends on our preferred stock have been or contemporaneously are declared and paid or provision for the payment thereof has been made.

Item 4.Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

This item is answered in respect of the Annual Meeting of Stockholders held on May 28, 2009. At the meeting, the following number of votes were cast with respect to each proposal:

1.Proposal to approve management’s nominees for director as follows.

NOMINEE

  FOR  AGAINST  ABSTAIN  BROKER
NONVOTES

Frank J. Borelli

  388,090,613  19,769,212  116,342  0

Reginald K. Brack

  378,905,649  28,905,908  164,610  0

Jocelyn Carter-Miller

  388,232,387  19,589,975  153,805  0

Jill M. Considine

  385,179,589  22,698,748  97,830  0

Richard A. Goldstein

  388,443,172  19,383,770  149,225  0

H. John Greeniaus

  388,002,955  19,774,104  199,108  0

Mary J. Steele Guilfoile

  399,704,051  8,128,292  143,824  0

William T. Kerr

  375,564,137  32,267,644  144,386  0

Michael I. Roth

  388,591,034  16,604,381  2,780,752  0

David M. Thomas

  399,764,776  8,066,680  144,711  0

2.Proposal to approve adoption of The Interpublic Group of Companies, Inc. 2009 Performance Incentive Plan.

FOR AGAINST ABSTAIN BROKER
NONVOTES
231,522,634 153,759,086 272,477 22,421,970

3.Proposal to approve adoption of the 2009 Non-Management Directors’ Stock Incentive Plan.

FOR AGAINST ABSTAIN BROKER
NONVOTES
305,057,675 80,209,295 287,227 22,421,970

4.Proposal to approve confirmation of the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal year 2009.

FOR AGAINST ABSTAIN BROKER
NONVOTES
404,763,444 2,973,774 238,949 0

5.Shareholder proposal for special shareholder meetings.

FOR AGAINST ABSTAIN BROKER
NONVOTES
191,276,894 193,478,370 800,752 22,420,151

Item 6.Exhibits

 

EXHIBIT NO.

  

DESCRIPTION

4(ii)Seventh Supplemental Indenture, dated as of June 15, 2009, between The Interpublic Group of Companies, Inc. (“Interpublic”) and U.S. Bank National Association to the Senior Debt Indenture, dated as of November 12, 2004, is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Interpublic’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) on June 16, 2009.
10(i)(A)Amendment No. 1, dated as of May 13, 2009, to a 3-Year Credit Agreement, dated as of July 18, 2008, among Interpublic, the lenders named therein and Citibank, N.A., as administrative agent (the “3-Year Credit Agreement”) is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Interpublic’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on May 18, 2009.
10(i)(B)Amendment No. 2, dated as of June 5, 2009, to the 3-Year Credit Agreement, is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Interpublic’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on June 8, 2009.
10(i)(C)Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of June 15, 2009, among Interpublic, Morgan Stanley & Co. Incorporated, Citigroup Global Markets Inc., J.P. Morgan Securities Inc. and UBS Securities LLC, is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Interpublic’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on June 16, 2009.
10(iii)(A)(1)The Interpublic Group of Companies, Inc. 2009 Performance Incentive Plan, (the “2009 PIP”) is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of Interpublic’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on June 2, 2009.
10(iii)(A)(2)2009 PIP Restricted Stock Award Agreement.
10(iii)(A)(3)2009 PIP Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement.
10(iii)(A)(4)2009 PIP Performance Share Award Agreement.
10(iii)(A)(5)2009 PIP Performance Unit Award Agreement.
10(iii)(A)(6)2009 PIP Combined Restricted Stock and Performance Cash Award Agreement.
10(iii)(A)(7)2009 PIP Combined Restricted Stock Unit and Performance Cash Award Agreement.
10(iii)(A)(8)2009 PIP Non-Statutory Stock Option Award Agreement.
10(iii)(A)(9)The 2009 Non-Management Directors’ Stock Incentive Plan (the “2009 NMD Plan”).
10(iii)(A)(10)2009 NMD Plan Restricted Stock Award Agreement.
10(iii)(A)(11)2009 NMD Plan Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement.
10(iii)(A)(12)2009 NMD Plan Non-Statutory Stock Option Award Agreement.
10(iii)(A)(13)The Interpublic Restricted Cash Plan, as Amended and Restated as of May 18, 2009.
12.1  Computation of Ratios of Earnings to Fixed Charges.
31.1  Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
31.2  Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
32  Certification of the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer furnished pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and Rule 13a-14(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

 

THE INTERPUBLIC GROUP OF COMPANIES, INC.

By

 

/s/Michael I. Roth

 

Michael I. Roth

Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

Date: JulyOctober 28, 2009

 

By

 

/s/Christopher F. Carroll

 

Christopher F. Carroll

Senior Vice President, Controller and

Chief Accounting Officer

(Principal Accounting Officer)

Date: JulyOctober 28, 2009

INDEX TO EXHIBITS

 

EXHIBIT NO.

  

DESCRIPTION

4(ii)Seventh Supplemental Indenture, dated as of June 15, 2009, between The Interpublic Group of Companies, Inc. (“Interpublic”) and U.S. Bank National Association to the Senior Debt Indenture, dated as of November 12, 2004, is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Interpublic’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) on June 16, 2009.
10(i)(A)Amendment No. 1, dated as of May 13, 2009, to a 3-Year Credit Agreement, dated as of July 18, 2008, among Interpublic, the lenders named therein and Citibank, N.A., as administrative agent (the “3-Year Credit Agreement”) is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Interpublic’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on May 18, 2009.
10(i)(B)Amendment No. 2, dated as of June 5, 2009, to the 3-Year Credit Agreement, is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Interpublic’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on June 8, 2009.
10(i)(C)Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of June 15, 2009, among Interpublic, Morgan Stanley & Co. Incorporated, Citigroup Global Markets Inc., J.P. Morgan Securities Inc. and UBS Securities LLC, is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Interpublic’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on June 16, 2009.
10(iii)(A)(1)The Interpublic Group of Companies, Inc. 2009 Performance Incentive Plan, (the “2009 PIP”) is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of Interpublic’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on June 2, 2009.
10(iii)(A)(2)2009 PIP Restricted Stock Award Agreement.
10(iii)(A)(3)2009 PIP Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement.
10(iii)(A)(4)2009 PIP Performance Share Award Agreement.
10(iii)(A)(5)2009 PIP Performance Unit Award Agreement.
10(iii)(A)(6)2009 PIP Combined Restricted Stock and Performance Cash Award Agreement.
10(iii)(A)(7)2009 PIP Combined Restricted Stock Unit and Performance Cash Award Agreement.
10(iii)(A)(8)2009 PIP Non-Statutory Stock Option Award Agreement.
10(iii)(A)(9)The 2009 Non-Management Directors’ Stock Incentive Plan (the “2009 NMD Plan”).
10(iii)(A)(10)2009 NMD Plan Restricted Stock Award Agreement.
10(iii)(A)(11)2009 NMD Plan Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement.
10(iii)(A)(12)2009 NMD Plan Non-Statutory Stock Option Award Agreement.
10(iii)(A)(13)The Interpublic Restricted Cash Plan, as Amended and Restated as of May 18, 2009.
12.1  Computation of Ratios of Earnings to Fixed Charges.
31.1  Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
31.2  Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
32  Certification of the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer furnished pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and Rule 13a-14(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

 

44