Indicate by check mark whether the issuer (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. YES x NO ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). YES ¨ NO ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). YES ¨ NO x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). YES ¨x NO ¨

The number of shares outstanding of the registrant’s common stock, as of ~~June 30,~~November 02, 2009 was ~~25,524,074.~~26,132,838.


	June 30, 2009			December 31, 2008			September 30, 2009			December 31, 2008
	(unaudited)						(unaudited)
ASSETS
Current assets
Cash and cash equivalents	$	690		$	404		$	1,948		$	404
Receivables:
Trade, less allowance:
6/30/2009 $3,297; 12/31/2008 $3,683		45,642			37,682
9/30/2009 $3,006; 12/31/2008 $3,683								43,325			37,682
Other		897			280			588			280
Inventories		35,615			31,549			29,311			31,549
Deferred taxes		3,716			4,285			3,550			4,285
Income Taxes		7,447			10,048			8,513			10,048
Other current assets		4,150			4,714			4,914			4,714

Total current assets		98,157			88,962			92,149			88,962
Property and equipment,less accumulated depreciation: 6/30/2009
$56,345; 12/31/2008 $55,520		65,052			57,156
Intangible assets,less accumulated amortization: 6/30/2009
$1,479; 12/31/2008 $1,449		304			295
Property and equipment,less accumulated depreciation: 9/30/2009 $57,564; 12/31/2008 $55,520								70,989			57,156
Intangible assets, less accumulated amortization: 9/30/2009 $1,495; 12/31/2008 $1,449								295			295
Notes Receivable and Other Assets		14,730			14,604			14,605			14,604

	$	178,243		$	161,017
							$	178,038		$	161,017

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Current liabilities
Current maturities of long-term debt and capital lease obligations	$	1,098		$	1,307		$	2,314		$	1,307
Accounts payable		24,659			22,795			24,047			22,795
Accrued expenses		17,063			13,517			11,871			13,517
Other current liabilities		6,179			6,179			6,179			6,179

Total current liabilities		48,999			43,798			44,411			43,798

Long-term capital lease obligations, less current maturities		190			554			173			554
Long-term debt, less current maturities		37,918			29,611			38,901			29,611
Long-term liabilities, other		3,821			4,286			3,851			4,286
Deferred taxes		—			—
Commitments and contingencies

Stockholders’ equity
Preferred stock, $.001 par value, 10,000 shares authorized; none issued		—			—
Common stock, $.001 par value; 50,000 shares authorized; issued and outstanding: 25,524 and 25,524 shares at June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively		26			26
Preferred stock, $.001par value, 10,000 shares authorized; none issued								—			—
Common stock, $.001 par value; 50,000 shares authorized; issued and outstanding: 26,133 and 25,524 shares at September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively								26			26
Additional paid-in capital		87,298			87,253			88,943			87,253
Accumulated other comprehensive loss		(966	)		(1,231	)		(995	)		(1,231	)
Retained earnings (deficit)		957			(3,280	)		2,728			(3,280	)

		87,315			82,768			90,702			82,768

	$	178,243		$	161,017		$	178,038		$	161,017


	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,						Three Months Ended September 30,						Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2009			2008			2009			2008			2009			2008			2009			2008
Net sales	$	58,727		$	57,269		$	106,747		$	106,463		$	60,426		$	61,070		$	167,173		$	167,533
Cost of goods sold		46,129			48,773			84,244			89,243			49,445			50,252			133,689			139,495

Gross profit		12,598			8,496			22,503			17,220			10,981			10,818			33,484			28,038
Operating expenses		8,559			9,313			16,094			18,589			8,034			9,418			24,128			28,007

Operating income (loss)		4,039			(817	)		6,409			(1,369	)
Operating income														2,947			1,400			9,356			31

Nonoperating income (expense):
Other income, net		148			1,442			902			4,045			451			588			1,353			4,633
Interest expense		(318	)		(492	)		(585	)		(1,125	)		(291	)		(498	)		(876	)		(1,623	)

		(170	)		950			317			2,920			160			90			477			3,010


Earnings before income taxes and extraordinary item		3,869			133			6,726			1,551			3,107			1,490			9,833			3,041

Provision for income taxes		1,432			53			2,489			620			1,337			596			3,825			1,216

Income before extraordinary item		2,437			80			4,237			931			1,770			894			6,008			1,825
Extraordinary gain on Fire (net of taxes)		—			6,802			—			8,335			—			—			—			8,335

Net earnings	$	2,437		$	6,882		$	4,237		$	9,266		$	1,770		$	894		$	6,008		$	10,160


Income before extraordinary item Basic earnings per share	$	0.10		$	0.00		$	0.17		$	0.04		$	0.07		$	0.03		$	0.23		$	0.07
Extraordinary item	$	—		$	0.27		$	—		$	0.32		$	—		$	—		$	—		$	0.32

Net earnings per share	$	0.10		$	0.27		$	0.17		$	0.36		$	0.07		$	0.03		$	0.23		$	0.39


Income before extraordinary item Diluted earnings per share	$	0.09		$	0.00		$	0.16		$	0.03		$	0.07		$	0.03		$	0.23		$	0.07
Extraordinary item	$	—		$	0.26		$	—		$	0.32		$	—		$	—		$	—		$	0.32

Net earnings per share	$	0.09		$	0.26		$	0.16		$	0.35		$	0.07		$	0.03		$	0.23		$	0.39


Weighted average common shares outstanding
Basic		25,524			25,725			25,524			25,724			25,928			25,724			25,660			25,724

Diluted		25,887			26,203			25,845			26,185			25,994			26,184			25,687			26,178


	Common Stock			Additional Paid-In Capital			Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss			Retained Earnings			Total			Common Stock			Additional Paid-In Capital			Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss			Retained Earnings			Total
Balance, January 1, 2008	$	26		$	87,305		$	(782	)	$	853		$	87,402		$	26		$	87,305		$	(782	)	$	853		$	87,402
Stock option award compensation					1,426									1,426						1,426									1,426
Purchase and retirement of 306 shares of common stock		(1	)		(1,904	)		—			—			(1,905	)
Retirement of 306 shares of common stock																	(1	)		(1,904	)		—			—			(1,905	)
Issuance of 138 shares of common stock upon exercise of options		1			426			—			—			427			1			426			—			—			427
Comprehensive loss
Net loss		—			—			—			(4,133	)		(4,133	)		—			—			—			(4,133	)		(4,133	)
Loss on cash flow hedges		—			—			(449	)		—			(449	)		—			—			(449	)		—			(449	)

Total Comprehensive loss, net of tax														(4,582	)														(4,582	)

Balance, December 31, 2008	$	26		$	87,253		$	(1,231	)	$	(3,280	)	$	82,768		$	26		$	87,253		$	(1,231	)	$	(3,280	)	$	82,768
Stock option award compensation					45									45						45			—			—			45
Retirement of 391 shares of common stock																	(1	)		(2,499	)		—			—			(2,500	)
Issuance of 1,000 shares of common stock upon exercise of options																	1			2,499			—			—			2,500
Tax benefit from stock options																	—			1,645			—			—			1,645
Comprehensive earnings
Net earnings		—			—			—			4,237			4,237			—			—			—			6,008			6,008
Gain on cash flow hedges		—			—			265			—			265			—			—			236			—			236

Total Comprehensive earnings, net of tax														4,502															6,244

Balance, June 30, 2009 (unaudited)	$	26		$	87,298		$	(966	)	$	957		$	87,315
Balance, September 30, 2009 (unaudited)																$	26		$	88,943		$	(995	)	$	2,728		$	90,702


	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,						Three Months Ended September 30,						Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2009			2008			2009			2008			2009			2008			2009			2008
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net cash provided by operating activities	$	860		$	1,818		$	2,665		$	5,468
Net earnings													$	1,770		$	894		$	6,008		$	10,160
Depreciation and amortization expense														1,419			1,358			4,150			4,483
Provision for bad debts														552			287			2,011			1,311
Extraordinary Gain (net of taxes)														—			—			—			(8,335	)
Compensation expense														—			—			45			175
Tax impact of stock options exercised														(1,645	)		—			(1,645	)		—
Deferred gain														(18	)		—			(42	)		—
Gain on disposal of property and equipment														(96	)		(1,459	)		(219	)		(1,388	)
Deferred Taxes														166			(479	)		455			(5,281	)
Increase in accounts receivable														(453	)		(2,358	)		(15,711	)		(11,438	)
(Increase) Decrease in other receivables														309			(103	)		(308	)		(67	)
(Increase) Decrease in inventory														6,305			(2,515	)		2,239			(3,725	)
Proceeds from insurance claim														—			—			1,135			15,479
Gain on sale of subsidiaries														—			—			—			(1,617	)
(Increase) Decrease in other current assets														(125	)		(163	)		1,565			3,685
Increase in other assets														(38	)		—			(120	)		—
Increase (Decrease) in accounts payable														(613	)		18			1,250			(4,753	)
Increase (Decrease) in accrued expenses														(2,974	)		1,517			6,411			3,776

Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities														4,559			(3,003	)		7,224			2,465

CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Disposal, net of cash acquired		—			—			—			(11	)		—			—			—			(11	)
Purchase of property and equipment		(6,060	)		(3,192	)		(9,910	)		(5,237	)		(2,888	)		(4,417	)		(12,798	)		(9,654	)
Proceeds from sale of property and equipment		205			7			254			10			5			3,397			259			3,407
Deferred gain on property sale														—			1,441			—			1,441
Proceeds from insurance claim on building and equipment		466			—			466			—			—			—			466			—
Decrease in other assets		478			479			647			678			354			612			1,001			1,290

Net cash used in investing activities		(4,911	)		(2,706	)		(8,543	)		(4,560	)
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities														(2,529	)		1,033			(11,072	)		(3,527	)

CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Principal payments on long-term borrowings		(943	)		(228	)		(1,133	)		(373	)		(351	)		(1,449	)		(1,484	)		(1,822	)
Net proceeds from (payments on) revolving credit agreement		5,233			596			7,387			(406	)		(2,066	)		3,868			5,321			3,462
Payment of Debt Issuance Costs		—			—			(90	)		—			—			—			(90	)		—
Tax impact of stock options exercised														1,645			—			1,645			—
Purchase and Retirement of Common Stock		—			(53	)		—			(334	)		—			—			—			(334	)
Proceeds from Sales of Common Stock		—			—			—			56			—			—			—			56

Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities		4,290			315			6,164			(1,057	)		(772	)		2,419			5,392			1,362

Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents		239			(573	)		286			(149	)
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents													$	1,258		$	449		$	1,544		$	300
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
Beginning of period		451			922			404			498		$	690		$	349		$	404		$	498

End of period	$	690		$	349		$	690		$	349		$	1,948		$	798		$	1,948		$	798

SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION
Cash paid during the period for:
Income taxes	$	179		$	743		$	241		$	793		$	592		$	46		$	833		$	839

Interest	$	411		$	558		$	612		$	1,122		$	223		$	477		$	819		$	1,599

SUPPLEMENTAL SCHEDULE OF NONCASH INVESTING AND FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Sale of equipment for note receivable	$	249		$	332		$	415		$	415

Purchase of building with debt	$	1,480		$	—		$	1,480		$	—

Sale of building for note receivable	$	200		$	—		$	200		$	—

Cashless exercise of common stock (Net)	$	—		$	(100	)	$	—		$	(370	)

Offset of accrued expenses against trade accounts receivable	$	2,412		$	1,614		$	5,839		$	8,825

Note Receivable in lieu of account receivable trade	$	—		$	677		$	—		$	677

Offset of accrued expenses against other receivables	$	—		$	900		$	—		$	900

DISPOSAL OF COMPANIES
Working Capital surplus disposed, net of cash and cash equivalents disposed		—			959			—			1,425
Fair value of other assets disposed, principally property and equipment		—			8,518			—			8,637
Goodwill disposed		—			—			—			589
Minority interest		—			—			—			141

	$	—		$	9,477		$	—		$	10,792

The Company designs, manufactures and sells air filters and related products. It is focused on providing complete environmental filtration systems for uses ranging from controlling contaminants in residences and commercial office buildings through specialized manufacturing environments for semiconductors and pharmaceuticals. The Company also designs and manufactures much of its own production equipment to automate processes to decrease labor costs associated with its standard products. The vast majority of the Company’s current revenues come from the sale of after-market replacement filters, since air filters are typically placed in equipment designed to last much longer than the filters.

The Company sells some products for end users outside of the United States through domestic specialty clean room contractors. These sales are accounted for as domestic sales. The Company also sells products through foreign distributors, primarily in Europe, and through a wholly-owned subsidiary, which sells to customers in the Pacific Rim. Sales through foreign distributors and its wholly owned foreign subsidiary total less than 5% of net sales. Assets held outside the United States are negligible.

The interim consolidated condensed financial statements presented herein are unaudited and have been prepared in accordance with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. These statements should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008. In the opinion of management the interim statements include all adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring adjustments) necessary to summarize fairly our financial position, results of operations, and cash flows. The results of operations and cash flows for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2009 may not be indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2009. Further, in connection with preparation of the consolidated condensed financial statements and in accordance with the recently issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 165 “Subsequent Events” ~~(SFAS 165)~~(included in Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 855), the Company evaluated subsequent events after the balance sheet date of ~~June~~September 30, 2009 through ~~July 30,~~November 2, 2009.

Other comprehensive loss is defined as the change in equity during a period, from transactions and other events not included in net earnings, excluding changes resulting from investments by owners (e.g., supplemental stock offerings) and distributions to owners (e.g., dividends).

As of ~~June~~September 30, 2009, accumulated comprehensive loss consisted of the following:


Balance at December 31, 2008	$	(1,231	)	$	(1,231	)
Net change during the period related to cash flow hedges		265			236

Balance at June 30, 2009	$	(966	)
Balance at September 30, 2009				$	(995	)

The majority of the Company’s accounts receivables are due from large retail, wholesale, construction and other companies. Credit is extended based on evaluation of the customers’ financial condition. Accounts receivable terms are within normal time frames for the respective industries. The Company maintains allowances for doubtful accounts for estimated losses, which are reviewed regularly by management. The estimated losses are based on the aging of accounts receivable balances and historical write-off experience, net of recoveries. If the financial condition of the Company’s customers were to deteriorate, resulting in an impairment of their ability to make payments, additional allowances may be required.

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts and operations of the Company and its subsidiaries, all of which are wholly owned. All intercompany transactions and balances are eliminated in consolidation.

Prior to February 1, 2008, Air Filter Sales and Service, Inc. was 39% owned by Flanders Corporation and 61% was owned by other shareholders unrelated to the Company or any of its officers and directors. As of February 1, 2008, Air Filter Sales and Service, Inc. ceased to be consolidated, due to the Stock Purchase Agreement dated February 1, 2008. The accompanying financial statements present the consolidated result including Air Filter Sales and Service, Inc. up until February 1, 2008 with all intercompany transactions eliminated. After that date the financial statements do not include the financial results of Air Filter Sales and Service, Inc. The revenues and expense of Air Filter Sales and Service, Inc. through February 1, 2008 were $254 and $216, respectively.

The Company has only limited involvement with derivative financial instruments. The Company has three interest-rate swap agreements to hedge against the potential impact on earnings from increases in market interest rates of two variable rate bonds and one variable rate note. Under the interest rate swap agreements for the bonds, we receive or make payments on a monthly basis, based on the differential between 5.49% and a tax exempt interest rate as determined by a remarketing agent. Under the interest rate swap agreement for the note, we receive or make payments on a monthly basis, based on the differential between 5.86% and LIBOR plus 1.75%. These interest rate swaps are accounted for as a cash flow hedge in accordance with ~~SFAS 133 and SFAS 138.~~FASB authoritative guidance. Gains or losses related to inefficiencies of the cash flow hedge were included in net income during the period related to hedge ineffectiveness. The tax affected fair market value of the interest rate swaps of ~~$966~~$995 is included in “Accumulated other comprehensive loss” on the balance sheet. This fair value was determined using level 2 inputs as defined in ~~SFAS No. 157.~~FASB authoritative guidance. The interest rate swap contracts on the bonds expire in 2013 and 2015 and the interest rate swap on the note expires in 2013.

The Company’s products are sold with terms and conditions, which vary depending on particular business environments in which the Company operates. The standard policy of the Company is to recognize revenue in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America; specifically SAB Topic ~~13A.~~13A (included in Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 605).

Generally, sales are recognized when shipments are made to customers. Rebates, allowances for damaged goods and other advertising and marketing program rebates, are accrued pursuant to contractual provisions and included in accrued expenses. An insignificant amount of our revenues fall under the percentage-of-completion method of accounting used for long-term contracts. Under this method, sales and gross profit are recognized as work is performed based on the relationship between actual costs incurred and total estimated costs at completion. Sales and gross profit are adjusted prospectively for revisions in estimated total contract costs and contract values. Estimated losses are recorded when identified.

Advertising costs are charged to operations when incurred and are included in operating expenses. Advertising costs for the quarters ended ~~June~~September 30, 2009 and ~~June~~September 30, 2008 were ~~$1,006~~$958 and ~~$1,371,~~$1,120, respectively. Advertising costs for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2009 and ~~June~~September 30, 2008 were ~~$2,000~~$2,959 and ~~$2,651,~~$3,772, respectively.

In March 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161, “Disclosures About Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities” (now known as Accounting Standards Codification (“~~SFAS 161”~~ASC”) 815). ~~SFAS 161~~ASC 815 is intended to improve financial reporting about derivative instruments and hedging activities by requiring enhanced disclosures to enable investors to better understand their effects on an entity’s financial position, financial performance, and cash flows. The new standard is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after November 15, 2008. The adoption of ~~SFAS 161~~ASC 815 did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements.

In May 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 162, “The Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles” (“SFAS 162”). The new standard is intended to improve financial reporting by identifying a consistent framework, or hierarchy, for selecting accounting principles to be used in preparing financial statements that are presented in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) for nongovernmental entities. The new standard is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after November 15, 2008. The adoption of SFAS 162 did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements or condition.

In May 2009, the FASB issued SFAS 165,“Subsequent Events” ~~the~~(now known asAccounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 855). The objective of this Statement is to establish general standards of accounting for and disclosure of events that occur after the balance sheet date but before financial statements are issued or are available to be issued. In particular, this Statement sets forth: 1. the period after the balance sheet date during which management of a reporting entity should evaluate events or transactions that may occur for potential recognition or disclosure in the financial statements, 2. the circumstances under which an entity should recognize events or transactions

occurring after the balance sheet date in its financial statements and 3. the disclosures that an entity should make about events or transactions that occurred after the balance sheet date. In accordance with this Statement, an entity should apply the requirements to interim or annual financial periods ending after June 15, 2009. The adoption of ~~SFAS 165~~ASC 855 did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements or condition.

In June 2009, the FASB issued SFAS 168, “The FASB Accounting Standards Codification and the Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles – a replacement of FASB Statement No. 162” ~~(SFAS 168)~~(now known as ASC 105-10). ~~SFAS 168~~ASC 105-10 provides for the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (the “Codification”) to become the single official source of authoritative, nongovernmental U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP). The Codification did not change GAAP but reorganizes the literature. ~~SFAS 168~~ASC 105-10 is effective for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009.

Other recent accounting pronouncements issued by the FASB ~~the AICPA,~~ and the SEC did not or are not believed by management to have a material impact on the Company’s present or future financial statements.

The following table summarizes the activity related to all Company stock options and warrants for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2009 and the year ended December 31, 2008:


	Warrants	Stock Options		Exercise Price per Share				Weighted Average Exercise Price per Share					Stock		Exercise Price per Share				Weighted Average Exercise Price per Share
	Warrants	Stock Options		Warrants		Options		Warrants		Options		Warrants	Options		Warrants		Options		Warrants		Options
Outstanding at January 1, 2008	—	3,267		$	—	$	1.74 - 11.72	$	—	$	5.53	—	3,267		$	—	$	1.74 - 11.72	$	—	$	5.53
Granted	15	55			4.69 - 4.69		4.69 - 5.71		4.69		4.78	15	55			4.69 - 4.69		4.69 - 5.71		4.69		4.78
Exercised	—	(138	)		—		1.74 - 5.21		—		3.09	—	(138	)		—		1.74 - 5.21		—		3.09
Canceled or expired	—	(279	)		—		3.93 - 11.72		—		8.93	—	(279	)		—		3.93 - 11.72		—		8.93

Outstanding at December 31, 2008	15	2,905			4.69 - 4.69		1.74 - 11.72		4.69		5.29	15	2,905			4.69 - 4.69		1.74 - 11.72		4.69		5.29
Granted	—	15			—		4.60 - 4.60		—		4.60	—	15			—		4.60 - 4.60		—		4.60
Exercised	—	—			—		—		—		—	—	(1,000	)		—		2.50 - 2.50		—		2.50
Canceled or expired	—	(20	)		—		5.21 - 5.21		—		5.21	—	(60	)		—		5.21 - 8.60		—		7.47

Outstanding at June 30, 2009	15	2,900			—		2.50 - 11.72		—	$	5.29

Outstanding at September 30, 2009												15	1,860			—		4.37 - 11.72		—	$	6.71

The options expire at various dates ranging from ~~August 2009~~January 2010 through January 2019.

As of ~~June~~September 30, 2009, there was no unrecognized stock-based compensation expense related to non-vested stock options.

The aggregate intrinsic value of options outstanding at ~~June~~September 30, 2009, based on the Company’s closing stock price of ~~$6.11~~$5.16 as of the last business day of the period ended ~~June~~September 30, 2009, which would have been received by the optionees had all options been exercised on that date was ~~$4,409.~~$156. The aggregate intrinsic value of options exercisable at ~~June~~September 30, 2009, based on the Company’s closing stock price of ~~$6.11~~$5.16 as of the last business day of the period ended ~~June~~September 30, 2009, which would have been received by the optionees had all options exercisable been exercised on that date was ~~$4,409.~~$156. The aggregate intrinsic value of options exercised during the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2009 was ~~$0.~~$3,890. Intrinsic value is the amount by which the fair value of the underlying stock exceeds the exercise price of the options.

Options on ~~1,285~~1,140 shares of common stock were not included in computing diluted EPS for the quarter period ended ~~June~~September 30, 2009, because their effects were anti-dilutive.

Inventories consist of the following at ~~June~~September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008:


	6/30/2009		12/31/2008		9/30/2009		12/31/2008
Finished goods	$	15,918	$	14,579	$	12,456	$	14,579
Work in progress		3,066		1,924		2,418		1,924
Raw materials		17,405		15,820		15,211		15,820

		36,389		32,323		30,085		32,323
Less allowances		774		774		774		774

	$	35,615	$	31,549	$	29,311	$	31,549

Other assets consist of the following at ~~June~~September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008:


	June 30, 2009		December 31, 2008		September 30, 2009		December 31, 2008
Other Assets	$	1,267	$	1,111	$	1,275	$	1,111
Notes Receivable		13,463		13,493		13,330		13,493

					$	14,605	$	14,604
	$	14,730	$	14,604

As of ~~June~~September 30, 2009 the Company’s total obligations to Bank of America were approximately ~~$22,135.~~$20,068. During ~~July~~September 2009, the Company entered into an amendment to the credit facility with its bank. The current revolving credit agreement with the bank provides a maximum line of credit of $36 million (subject to availability) and bears interest at (i) LIBOR plus 3.75%; or (ii) the bank’s base rate plus 2.75%. The revolving credit agreement is part of a combined facility with a bank that also includes a $12 million facility to guarantee letters of credit. The line of credit is due in 2011. The combined facility is collateralized by substantially all of the Company’s assets and restricts capital expenditures, payment of dividends and share repurchases. The company also has debt to a regional development authority with certain restrictive covenants. As of ~~June~~September 30, 2009 the Company is in compliance with its financial covenants.

In June of 2006 a manufacturing facility in Pennsylvania was damaged by flood. In July 2007 another manufacturing facility in Florida was destroyed by fire. The extraordinary gain as of ~~June~~September 30, 2008 of $8,335 was calculated as the gain on the costs that were attributable to these natural disasters ($1,587) that were less than the insurance proceeds ($15,479), net of taxes of $5,557.

In September 2008, the warehouse in Auburn, Pennsylvania was partially destroyed by fire. All anticipated losses resulting from this fire are expected to be covered by insurance.

In May of 2009 the Company acquired furnace filter equipment and inventory of Wildwood Industries, Inc. for $3.6 million. Flanders then immediately sold unrelated assets to R.P.S Products, Inc. for $2.2 million.

The IRS is currently examining the Company’s federal income tax returns of 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, and 2006. To date the IRS has proposed certain changes for the 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, and 2006 examinations, resulting in additional liabilities due. The Company has submitted a petition to the IRS for a redetermination of the changes with the U.S. Tax Court. These liabilities have been included in the Company’s FIN 48 (also known as ASC 740) liability which is included in other current liabilities.

From time to time, the Company is a party to various legal proceedings incidental to our business. None of these proceedings are material to our business, operations or financial condition.

In the opinion of management, although the outcome of any legal proceeding cannot be predicted with certainty, the ultimate liability of the Company in connection with its legal proceedings will not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial position, but could be material to the results of operations in any one future accounting period.

In August 2008, the Company sold its Bartow property to Wal-Pat II, LLC, a related party. The property was sold for $3.7 million and ~~part~~parts of the proceeds were used to pay down the existing debt on this property in the amount of approximately $1.8 million. The Company has leased this property back in March 2009. The Company has recorded a deferred gain of $1.4 million on the sale which will be amortized to rent expense over the lease term of 10 years.

During the second quarter 2009 the Company purchased a building in Folcroft, Pennsylvania from Wal-Pat II, LLC by assuming a note payable for $1.5 million.

During the third quarter 2009 the Company purchased a building in Rosenburg, Texas from Wal-Pat III, LLC by assuming a note payable for $3.4 million from Wal-Pat III, LLC and by providing another note payable to Wal-Pat III, LLC for another $1.2 million.

The above terms and amounts are not necessarily indicative of the terms and amounts that would have been incurred had comparable transactions been entered into with independent parties.

The following discussions should be read in conjunction with our Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements and the notes thereto presented in “Item 1 – Financial Statements” and our audited financial statements and the related Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations included in our report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008. The information set forth in this “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” includes forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. Many factors, including those discussed below under “Factors That May Affect Future Results” and “Outlook” could cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in the forward-looking statements below.

Flanders is a full-range air filtration product company engaged in designing, manufacturing and marketing high performance, mid-range and standard-grade air filtration products and related products and services. Our focus has evolved from expansion through acquisition to increasing the quality and efficiency of our high-volume replacement filtration products, and using these benefits to compete more effectively in the marketplace. We also design and manufacture much of our own production equipment.

The following discussion and analysis is based upon our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The preparation of our financial statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of revenues and expenses, and assets and liabilities during the periods reported. Estimates are used when accounting for certain items such as revenues, allowances for returns, early payment discounts, customer discounts, doubtful accounts, employee compensation programs, depreciation and amortization periods, taxes, inventory values, insurance programs, and valuations of investments, other intangible assets and long-lived assets. We base our estimates on historical experience where applicable and other assumptions that we believe are reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results may differ from our estimates under different assumptions or conditions. In the ordinary course of accounting for items such as allowance for doubtful accounts, inventory valuation, and other items mentioned above, we make changes in estimates as appropriate in the circumstances. Such changes and refinements in estimation methodologies are reflected in report results of operations and, if material, the approximate effects of changes in estimates are disclosed in the Notes to our Consolidated Financial Statements. We believe that the following critical accounting policies reflect our more significant judgments and estimates used in preparation of our consolidated financial statements.

We maintain allowances for estimated losses resulting from the inability of our customers to make required payments. We base our estimates on the aging of our accounts receivable balances and our historical write-off experience, net of recoveries. Actual results could differ materially from this estimate, making it reasonably possible that a change in this estimate could occur in the near term.

We value our inventories at the lower of cost or market. We write down inventory balances for estimated obsolescence or unmarketable inventory equal to the difference between the cost of the inventory and the estimated market value based upon assumptions about future demand and market conditions. If actual market conditions are less favorable than those projected by management, additional inventory write-downs may be required.

Estimates of our insurance costs are developed by management’s evaluation of the likelihood and probable amount of potential claims based on historical experience and evaluation of each claim. Changes in the key assumptions may occur in the future, which would result in changes to related insurance costs.

Poor operating performance of the business activities related to intangible assets or long-lived assets could result in future cash flows of these assets declining below carrying values, which could require a write-down of the carrying value of these assets, which would adversely affect operating results.

Generally, sales are recognized when shipments are made to customers. Rebates, allowances for damaged goods and other advertising and marketing program rebates are accrued pursuant to contractual provisions and included in accrued expenses. An insignificant amount of our revenues fall under the percentage-of-completion method of accounting used for long-term contracts. Under this method, sales and gross profit are recognized as work is performed based on the relationship between actual costs incurred and total estimated costs at completion. Sales and gross profit are adjusted prospectively for revisions in estimated total contract costs and contract values. Estimated losses are recorded when identified.

Results of Operations for Three Months Ended ~~June~~September 30, 2009 Compared to ~~June~~September 30, 2008

The following table summarizes our results of operations as a percentage of net sales for the three months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2009 and 2008.


	Three Months Ended June 30,										Three Months Ended September 30,
	2009					2008					2009				2008
Net sales	$	58,727		100.0	%	$	57,269		100.0	%	$	60,426	100.0	%	$	61,070	100.0	%
Gross profit		12,598		21.5			8,496		14.8			10,981	18.2			10,818	17.7
Operating expenses		8,559		14.6			9,313		16.3			8,034	13.3			9,418	15.4
Operating income (loss)		4,039		6.9			(817	)	(1.4	)
Nonoperating income (expense)		(170	)	(0.3	)		950		1.7
Operating income												2,947	4.9			1,400	2.3
Nonoperating income												160	0.3			90	0.1
Provision for income taxes		1,432		2.4			53		0.1			1,337	2.2			596	1.0
Extraordinary gain on Fire and Flood (net of taxes)		—		—			6,802		11.9
Net earnings		2,437		4.1			6,882		12.0			1,770	2.9			894	1.5

Net sales: Net sales for the ~~second~~third quarter of 2009 ~~increased~~decreased by ~~$1,458,~~$644, or ~~2.5%~~1.1%, to ~~$58,727~~$60,426 from ~~$57,269~~$61,070 for the ~~second~~third quarter of 2008. Sales ~~increased~~decreased during the ~~second~~third quarter of 2009 compared to the ~~second~~third quarter of 2008 due to a decrease in our commercial and industrial business lines partially offset by an increase in our retail ~~business partially offset by a decrease in most areas of our commercial and industrial business lines.~~business.

Gross Profit: Gross profit for the ~~second~~third quarter of 2009 increased by ~~$4,102,~~$163, or ~~48.3%~~1.5%, to ~~$12,598,~~$10,981, which represented ~~21.5%~~18.2% of net sales, from ~~$8,496,~~$10.818, which represented ~~14.8%~~17.7% of net sales for the ~~second~~third quarter of 2008. The gross profit was higher during the ~~second~~third quarter of 2009 due to ~~2008 increases~~decreases in ~~in-bound shipping costs, due to increased fuel costs and~~ raw material ~~costs, especially in the cost of metal. Also, in 2008, our media producing facility was producing for part of the period which contributed to lower margins.~~costs.

Operating expenses: Operating expenses for the ~~second~~third quarter of 2009 decreased by ~~$754~~$1,384 or ~~8.1%~~14.7%, to ~~$8,559,~~$8,034, representing ~~14.6%~~13.3% of net sales, from ~~$9,313,~~$9,418, representing ~~16.3%~~15.4% of net sales, for the ~~second~~third quarter of 2008. The decrease in operating expenses is primarily due to the sale of certain direct sales offices, decreases in freight costs of ~~$620,~~$850, decreases in rent of $201, decreases in commissions of ~~$363,~~$102, and a decrease in advertising costs and royalty expenses of ~~$366~~$298 offset by an increase in our bad debt expense of ~~$488.~~$417.

Nonoperating income ~~(expense)~~: Net nonoperating income for the ~~second~~third quarter of 2009 ~~decreased~~increased by ~~$1,120,~~$70, to ~~expense of $170~~$160 representing ~~(0.3%)~~0.3% of net sales, from ~~income of $950~~$90 representing ~~1.7%~~.1% of net sales, for the ~~second~~third quarter of 2008 due to ~~the sale of a direct office and its media producing facility~~lower interest expense during the ~~second~~third quarter 2009 compared to the third quarter 2008.

Provision for income taxes: The IRS is currently examining the Company’s federal income tax returns of 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, and 2006. To date the IRS has proposed certain changes for the 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, and 2006 examinations, resulting in additional liabilities due. The Company has submitted a petition to the IRS for a redetermination of the changes with the U.S. Tax Court. These liabilities have been included in the Company’s FIN 48 (now known as ASC 740) liability which is included in other current liabilities. Our provision for the three months of 2009 and 2008 were a blended state and federal rate of approximately ~~37%~~38% and 40% of pretax earnings, respectively.

~~Extraordinary gain on Fire and Flood (net of taxes)~~: In June of 2006 a manufacturing facility in Pennsylvania was damaged by flood. In July 2007 another manufacturing facility in Florida was destroyed by fire. The extraordinary gain for the quarter ended June 30, 2008 of $6,802 was calculated as the gain on the costs that were attributable to these natural disasters ($613) that were less than the insurance proceeds ($11,950), net of taxes of $4,535.

Results of Operations for ~~Six~~Nine Months Ended ~~June~~September 30, 2009 Compared to ~~June~~September 30, 2008

The following table summarizes our results of operations as a percentage of net sales for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2009 and 2008.


	Six Months Ended June 30,									Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2009				2008					2009				2008
Net sales	$	106,747	100.0	%	$	106,463		100.0	%	$	167,173	100.0	%	$	167,533	100.0	%
Gross profit		22,503	21.1			17,220		16.2			33,484	20.0			28,038	16.7
Operating expenses		16,094	15.1			18,589		17.5			24,128	14.4			28,007	16.7
Operating income (loss)		6,409	6.0			(1,369	)	(1.3	)
Operating income											9,356	5.6			31	0.0
Nonoperating income		317	0.3			2,920		2.7			477	0.3			3,010	1.8
Provision for income taxes		2,489	2.3			620		0.6			3,825	2.3			1,216	0.7
Extraordinary gain on Fire and Flood (net of taxes)		—	—			8,335		7.8			—	—			8,335	5.0
Net earnings		4,237	4.0			9,266		8.7			6,008	3.6			10,160	6.1

Net sales: Net sales for the first ~~half~~nine months of 2009 ~~increased~~decreased by ~~$284,~~$360, or ~~(0.3%~~(0.2%), to ~~$106,747~~$167,173 from ~~$106,463~~$167,533 for the first ~~half~~nine months of 2008. Sales ~~increased~~decreased during the ~~second quarter~~first nine months of 2009 compared to the ~~second quarter~~first nine months of 2008 due to a decrease in our commercial and industrial business lines partially offset by an increase in our retail ~~business partially offset by a decrease in most areas of our commercial and industrial business lines.~~business.

Gross Profit: Gross profit for the first ~~half~~nine months of 2009 increased by ~~$5,283,~~$5,446, or ~~30.7%~~19.4%, to ~~$22,503,~~$33,484, which represented ~~21.1%~~20.0% of net sales, from ~~$17,220,~~$28,038, which represented ~~16.2%~~16.7% of net sales for the first ~~half~~nine months of 2008. The gross profit was higher during the first ~~half~~nine months of 2009 due to ~~2008 increases~~decreases in ~~in-bound shipping costs, due to increased fuel costs and~~ raw material costs ~~especially in the cost of metal.~~and improved operational efficiencies. Also, in 2008, our media producing facility was producing for part of the period which contributed to lower margins.

Operating expenses: Operating expenses for the first ~~half~~nine months of 2009 decreased by ~~$2,495~~$3,879 or ~~13.4%~~13.9%, to ~~$16,094,~~$24,128, representing ~~15.1%~~14.4% of net sales, from ~~$18,589,~~$28,007, representing ~~17.5%~~16.7% of net sales, for the first ~~half~~nine months of 2008. The decrease in operating expenses is primarily due to the sale of certain direct sales offices, decreases in freight costs of ~~$1.4~~$2.1 million, decreases in commissions of ~~$1.6 million,~~$846, and a decrease in advertising costs and royalty expenses of ~~$647~~$1.2 million offset by an increase in our bad debt expense of ~~$425 and insurance expenses of $270.~~$628.

Nonoperating income ~~(expense)~~: Net nonoperating income for the first ~~half~~nine months of 2009 decreased by ~~$2,603,~~$2,533, to ~~$317~~$477 representing 0.3% of net sales, from ~~$2,920~~$3,010 representing ~~2.7%~~1.8% of net sales, for the first ~~half~~nine months of 2008 due to the sale of certain direct sales offices and its media producing facility during the first ~~half~~nine months of 2008 as well as the settling of trade accounts payable with Superior Diecutting, Inc. (previously a related party of the Company) for less than what was owed during the first ~~half~~nine months of 2008.

liabilities due. The Company has submitted a petition to the IRS for a redetermination of the changes with the U.S. Tax Court. These liabilities have been included in the Company’s FIN 48 (now known as ASC 740) liability which is included in other current liabilities. Our provision for the ~~six~~nine months of 2009 and 2008 were a blended state and federal rate of approximately ~~37%~~38% and 40% of pretax earnings, respectively.

Extraordinary gain on Fire and Flood (net of taxes): In June of 2006 a manufacturing facility in Pennsylvania was damaged by flood. In July 2007 another manufacturing facility in Florida was destroyed by fire. The extraordinary gain as of ~~June~~September 30, 2008 of $8,335 was calculated as the gain on the costs that were attributable to these natural disasters ($1,587) that were less than the insurance proceeds ($15,479), net of taxes of $5,557.

Our working capital was approximately ~~$49,158~~$47,738 at ~~June~~September 30, 2009, compared to approximately $45,164 at December 31, 2008. This includes cash and cash equivalents of ~~$690,~~$1,948, at ~~June~~September 30, 2009 and $404 at December 31, 2008.

Our trade receivables increased ~~$7,960,~~$5,643, or ~~21.1%~~15.0% to ~~$45,642~~$43,325 at ~~June~~September 30, 2009, from $37,682 at December 31, 2008 due to the timing of sales during the second ~~quarter~~and third quarters of 2009. Trade receivables are typically higher during the second and third quarters due to higher sales volume due to increased demand during the warmer months of the year.

Inventories ~~increased $4,066,~~decreased $2,238, or ~~12.9%~~7.1%, to ~~$35,615~~$29,311 at ~~June~~September 30, 2009 from $31,549 at December 31, 2008. The ~~increase~~decrease in inventory was primarily due to the increase in demand for the Company’s retail products during the latter part of the third quarter 2009 as well asimproved management in the ~~seasonal increase in inventory as the Company prepares for the peak demand during the warmer months.~~Company’s procurement processes.

Our continuing operations generated ~~$860~~$4,559 and ~~$1,818~~consumed $3,003 of cash during the ~~second~~third quarter of 2009 and 2008, respectively. The ~~decrease~~increase in cash flows from operating activities was primarily due to the decrease in ~~cash received from the extraordinary items along with the increase in~~ inventory, offset by decreases in accounts ~~receivable~~payable and ~~deferred taxes and by increases in accounts payable.~~accrued expenses as well as the tax impact of stock options exercised.

Our financing activities ~~generated $4,290~~consumed $772 of cash during the ~~second~~third quarter of 2009, primarily consisting of ~~proceeds~~payments on the line of credit, net of payments on other long term ~~borrowings.~~borrowings, offset by the tax impact of stock options exercised. Our investing activities ~~used $4,911~~consumed $2,529 of cash during the ~~second~~third quarter of 2009, primarily due to purchase of property and equipment.

During ~~July~~September 2009, the Company entered into an amendment to the credit facility with its bank. The current revolving credit agreement with the bank provides a maximum line of credit of $36 million (subject to availability) and bears interest at (i) LIBOR plus 3.75%; or (ii) the bank’s base rate plus 2.75%. The revolving credit agreement is part of a combined facility with a bank that also includes a $12 million facility to guarantee letters of credit. The line of credit is due in 2011. The combined facility is collateralized by substantially all of the Company’s assets and restricts capital expenditures, payment of dividends and share repurchases.

In connection with the working capital credit facility and notes payable to a regional development authority and bank, the Company and its majority owned subsidiaries have agreed to certain restrictive covenants which include, among other things, not paying dividends or repurchasing its stock without prior written consent, and maintenance of certain financial ratios at all times including: a minimum current ratio; a minimum tangible net worth; a maximum ratio of total liabilities to tangible net worth; a minimum fixed charge coverage ratio; and a minimum earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization amount. As of ~~June~~September 30, 2009 the financial covenants of the Company are in compliance with the credit facility.

We believe that our cash on hand, cash generated by operations, and cash available from our existing credit facilities is sufficient to meet the capital demands of our current operations during the 2009 fiscal year. Any major increases in sales, particularly in new products, may require substantial capital investment for the manufacture of filtration products. Failure to obtain sufficient capital could materially adversely impact our growth potential.

During the past three years, we have captured additional market share among “big box” retailers like The Home Depot, Lowe’s and Wal-Mart, capitalizing on our ability to service national accounts from regional distribution centers. We anticipate additional market gains among these types of retailers during the next two years and are introducing new products focused on their marketing and end-user requirements. Sales to these retail outlets, while seasonal, also tend to follow progress in the overall economy. Additional gains in market share in this market may not have a significant impact on revenues without some recovery in the overall U.S. economy. Additionally, significant revenue enhancement to these customers is largely dependent upon the success of the new products we are introducing to this marketplace.

We have adapted our biocontainment products for use as part of a system for hardening government buildings, commercial office complexes and public venues against airborne bioweapons such as anthrax and smallpox. There is currently an increase of interest in these products over the past quarter. Any interest towards hardening these types of facilities against airborne bioweapons could have a significant impact on our business.

Sales of air filtration products for semiconductor facilities, historically a major market, are expected to be slow again during 2009, with most analysts pushing recovery for this sector out until 2010.

We have collected data that indicates that residential filter users replace their filters, on average, approximately one and a half times per year. Manufacturers of residential furnace and air conditioning systems recommend that these filters be changed every month. A minor trend toward increased maintenance of these residential heating and cooling systems could have a positive impact on our business.

Our most common products, in terms of unit and dollar volume, are residential throw-away spun-glass filters, which usually sell for prices under $1.00. Any increase in consumer concern regarding air pollution, airborne pollens, allergens, and other residential airborne contaminants could result in replacement of some of these products with higher value products. Our higher value products include our NaturalAire^® higher-efficiency filters for residential use with associated sales prices typically over $5.00 each. Any such trend would have a beneficial effect on our business.

We believe there is currently a gradually increasing public awareness of the issues surrounding indoor air quality and that this trend will continue for the next several years. We also believe there is an increase in public concern regarding the effects of indoor air quality on employee productivity, as well as an increase in interest by standards-making bodies in creating specifications and techniques for detecting, defining and solving indoor air quality problems. We further believe there will be an increase in interest in our Absolute Isolation Barriers in the future because these products may be used in both semiconductor and pharmaceutical manufacturing plants to prevent cross-contamination between different lots and different processes being performed at the same facility. These products also increase production yields in many applications.

Currently, the largest domestic market for air filtration products is for mid-range ASHRAE-rated products and HVAC systems, typically used in commercial and industrial buildings. To date, our penetration of this market has been relatively small. We believe our ability to offer a “one stop” supply of air filtration products to HVAC distributors and wholesalers may increase our share of this market. We also believe that our recently developed modular air handlers and environmental tobacco smoke systems will enable us to expand sales to these customers. We intend our new products to serve as high profile entrants with distributors and manufacturers’ representatives, who can then be motivated to carry our complete product line.

We have continually looked for cost reductions in our products. During the past five years, we have continued to complete the development and redesigning of numerous systems and products which were only partially completed when we acquired the companies which originally claimed to have fully developed them. These products include the automated machinery necessary for high-speed production of our pleated filters, acquired with Precisionaire, and the mass-production processes for bonded carbon high-mass zero-density products. During 2006, we built our first fully automated production lines which reduced our labor related costs.

This Outlook section, and other portions of this document, include certain “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of that term in Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, including, among others, those statements preceded by, following or including the words “believe,” “expect,” “intend,” “anticipate” or similar expressions. These forward-looking statements are based largely on the current expectations of management and are subject to a number of assumptions, risks and uncertainties. Our actual results could differ materially from these forward-looking statements. Important factors to consider in evaluating such forward-looking statements include those discussed in Item 1A. Risk Factors as well as:

In light of these risks and uncertainties, there can be no assurance that the events contemplated by the forward-looking statements contained in this Form 10-Q will in fact occur.

We are exposed to various market risks, primarily changes in interest rates. Market risk is the potential loss arising from adverse change in market rates and prices, such as foreign currency exchange and interest rates. For Flanders, these exposures are primarily related to changes in interest rates. We do not hold any derivatives or other financial instruments for trading or speculative purposes.

The fair value of the Company’s total long-term debt, including capital leases and current maturities of long-term debt, at ~~June~~September 30, 2009 was ~~$39,206.~~$41,388. Market risk was estimated as the potential decrease (increase) in future earnings and cash flows resulting from a hypothetical 10% increase (decrease) in the Company’s estimated weighted average borrowing rate at ~~June~~September 30, 2009. Although most of the interest on the Company’s debt is indexed to a market rate, there would be no material effect on the future earnings or cash flows related to the Company’s total debt for such a hypothetical change.

We have only a limited involvement with derivative financial instruments. We have three interest-rate swap agreements to hedge against the potential impact on earnings from increases in market interest rates of two variable rate bonds and one variable rate note. Under the interest rate swap agreements for the bonds, we receive or make payments on a monthly basis, based on the differential between 5.49% and a tax exempt interest rate as determined by a remarketing agent. Under the interest rate swap agreement for the note, we receive or make payments on a monthly basis, based on the differential between 5.86% and LIBOR plus 1.75%. These interest rate swaps are accounted for as a cash flow hedge in accordance with ~~SFAS 133 and SFAS 138.~~FASB authoritative guidance. Gains or losses related to inefficiencies of the cash flow hedge were included in net income during the period related to hedge ineffectiveness. The tax affected fair market value of the interest rate swaps of ~~$966~~$995 is included in “Accumulated other comprehensive loss” on the balance sheet. The interest rate swap contracts on the bonds expire in 2013 and 2015 and the interest rate swap on the note expires in 2013.

The Company’s financial position is not materially affected by fluctuations in currencies against the U.S. dollar, since assets held outside the United States are negligible. Risks due to changes in foreign currency exchange rates are negligible, as the preponderance of our foreign sales occur over short periods of time or are demarcated in U.S. dollars.

Under the supervision and with the participation of the Company’s management, including the Company’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer, the Company conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operations of its disclosure controls and procedures, as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on their evaluation, our principal executive officer and principal financial officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective such that the material information required to be included in our Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) reports (i) is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in SEC rules and forms and (ii) is accumulated and communicated to the Company’s management, including its principal executive officer and principal financial officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

There were no changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting during the ~~second~~third quarter of 2009, which were identified in connection with management’s evaluation required by paragraph (d) of rules 13a-15 and 15d-15 under the Exchange Act, that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

From time to time, we are a party to various legal proceedings incidental to our business. None of the current proceedings in which we are involved are material to our business, operations or financial condition.

Our business, financial condition, operating results and cash flows can be impacted by a number of factors, including, but not limited to those set forth below, any one of which could cause our actual results to vary materially from recent results or from our anticipated future

results. For a discussion identifying additional risk factors and important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those anticipated, see the discussion in “Factors That May Affect Future Results” in our Form 10-K for 2008 and in “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements” in our 2008 Annual Report and in this Form 10-Q.

Failure to Manage Future Growth Could Adversely Impact Our Business Due to the Strain on Our Management, Financial and Other Resources

If our business expands in the future, the additional growth will place burdens on management to manage such growth while maintaining profitability. Our ability to compete effectively and manage future growth depends on our ability to:

Any failure to manage growth effectively could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Failure to Adequately Ramp-Up Production Capacity to Meet Demand Could Adversely Impact Our Business Due to Strain on Financial Resources.

Any delays in an untried supply chain, new production chains, and other delays common to the launch of a new product line could also adversely impact the success of the products, as well as current relationships with major accounts.

Our continued success depends on our ability to compete in an industry that is highly competitive. This competition may increase as new competitors enter the market. Several of our competitors may have longer operating histories and greater financial, marketing and other resources than we do. Additionally, our competitors may introduce new products or enhancements to products that could cause a decline in sales or loss of market acceptance of our existing products. Under our current competitive strategy, we endeavor to remain competitive by:

Although our executive management team continues to review and monitor our strategic plans, we have no assurance that we will be able to follow our current strategy or that this strategy will be successful.

Our Business May Suffer if Our Strategy to Increase the Size and Customer Base of the Air Filtration Market is Unsuccessful

We are developing new products as part of our strategy to increase the size and customer base of the air filtration market. We have no assurance that this strategy will be successful. We have no guarantee that any new products we develop will gain acceptance in the marketplace, or that these products will be successful. Additionally, we have no assurance we will be able to recoup the expenditures associated with the development of these products. To succeed in this area we must:

We May Experience Critical Equipment Failure Which Could Have a Material Adverse Effect on Our Business

If we experience extended periods of downtime due to the malfunction or failure of our automated production equipment, our business, financial condition and operations may suffer. We design and manufacture much of the automated production equipment used in our facilities. We also use other technologically advanced equipment for which manufacturers may have limited production capability or service experience. If we are unable to quickly repair our equipment or quickly obtain new equipment or parts from outside manufacturers, we could experience extended periods of downtime in the event of malfunction or equipment failure.

Our Plan to Centralize Overhead Functions May Not Produce the Anticipated Benefits to Our Operating Results

We are currently completing the implementation of plans to centralize overhead functions and eliminate duplication of efforts between our subsidiaries in the following areas:

We have no assurance that cutting overhead in this fashion will have the anticipated benefits to our operating results. Additionally, we have no assurance that these reorganizations will not significantly disrupt the operations of the affected subsidiaries.

Our success and future operating results depend in part upon our ability to retain our executives and key personnel, many of whom would be difficult to replace. Our success also depends on our ability to attract highly qualified engineering, manufacturing, and technical sales and support personnel for our operations. Competition for such personnel, particularly qualified engineers, is intense, and there can be no assurance that we will be successful in attracting or retaining such personnel. Our failure to attract or retain such persons could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Our Current Distribution Channels May be Unavailable if Our Manufacturers’ Representatives Decide to Work Primarily With One of Our Competitors

We provide our manufacturers’ representatives with the ability to offer a full product line of air filtration products to existing and new customers. Some of our competitors offer similar arrangements. We do not have exclusive relationships with all of our representatives. Consequently, if our representatives decide to work primarily with one of our competitors, our current distribution channels, and hence, our sales, could be significantly reduced.

We are subject to complex income tax and other taxing regulations. Significant judgment is required in the determination of a provision for income taxes. In the ordinary course of our business, there are many transactions and calculations where the ultimate tax determination is uncertain. We are regularly under audit by taxing authorities. Although we believe our tax estimates are reasonable, the final outcome of tax audits in any related litigation could be materially different than that which is reflected in historical income tax provisions and accruals. Based on the status of a given tax audit or related litigation, a material effect on our income tax provision or net income may result in a period or periods from initial recognition in our reported financial results to the final closure that tax auditor settlement of related litigation when the ultimate tax and related cash flow is known with certainty.

As of ~~June~~September 30, 2009, our directors and executive officers beneficially held approximately ~~35.2%~~32.4% of our outstanding common stock. As a result, such shareholders effectively control or significantly influence all matters requiring shareholder approval. These matters include the election of directors and approval of significant corporate transactions. Such concentration of ownership may also have the effect of delaying or preventing a change in control that may otherwise be advantageous to the non-affiliated shareholders.

We May be Required to Issue Stock in the Future That Will Dilute the Value of Our Existing Stock

We have granted options to purchase a total of ~~2,900,000~~1,860,000 shares of common stock to various parties with exercise prices ranging from ~~$2.50~~$4.37 to $11.72 per share. These options are all currently exercisable. Additionally, if the option holders exercise their options, the interests of current shareholders may be diluted.

Even though our common stock is currently traded on the NASDAQ Stock Market’s Global Select Market, it has less liquidity than many other stocks quoted on a national securities exchange.

The trading volume in our common stock on the NASDAQ Global Select Market has been relatively low when compared with larger companies listed on the NASDAQ Global Select Market or other stock exchanges. Although we have experienced increased liquidity in our stock, we cannot say with any certainty that a more active and liquid trading market for our common stock will continue to develop. Because of this, it may be more difficult for shareholders to sell a substantial number of shares for the same price at which shareholders could sell a smaller number of shares.

We cannot predict the effect, if any, that future sales of our common stock in the market, or the availability of shares of common stock for sale in the market, will have on the market price of our common stock. We can give no assurance that sales of substantial amounts of common stock in the market, or the potential for large amounts of sales in the market, would not cause the price of our common stock to decline or impair our future ability to raise capital through sales of our common stock.

The market price of our common stock has fluctuated significantly, and may fluctuate in the future. These fluctuations may be unrelated to our performance. General market or industry price declines or overall market volatility in the future could adversely affect the price of our common stock, and the current market price may not be indicative of future market prices.

Our internal control over financial reporting may have weaknesses or inadequacies that may be material.

Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 requires us to perform an evaluation of our internal control over financial reporting and our auditor to attest to such evaluation on an annual basis. Management concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective at ~~June~~September 30, 2009. Ongoing compliance with these requirements is expected to be expensive and time-consuming and may negatively impact our results of operations. While our management did not identify any material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting at ~~June~~September 30, 2009 and concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective, we cannot make any assurances that material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting will not be identified in the future. If any material weaknesses are identified in the future, we may be required to make material changes in our internal control over financial reporting, which could negatively impact our results of operations. In addition, upon such occurrence, our management may not be able to conclude that our internal control over financial reporting is effective or our independent registered public accounting firm may not be able to attest that our internal control over financial reporting was effective. If we cannot conclude that our internal control over financial reporting is effective or if our independent registered public accounting firm is not able to attest that our internal control over financial reporting is effective, we may be subject to regulatory scrutiny, and a loss of public confidence in our internal control over financial reporting, which may cause the value of our common stock to decrease.

Our Shareholders May Not Realize Certain Opportunities Because of North Carolina Law

We are subject to the Control Shares Acquisition Act of the State of North Carolina. This act provides that any person who acquires “control shares” of a publicly held North Carolina corporation will not have voting rights with respect to the acquired shares in certain circumstances. The North Carolina Shareholder Protection Act requires the affirmative vote of 95% of our voting shares to approve a business combination with any entity that beneficially owns 20% of the outstanding voting shares of the corporation unless the “fair price” provisions of the Act are satisfied. These provisions could deprive shareholders of opportunities to realize takeover premiums for their shares or other advantages that large accumulations of stock would typically provide.

The constantly changing body of environmental laws and regulations may significantly influence our business and products. These laws and regulations require that various environmental standards be met and impose liability for the failure to comply with such standards. While we endeavor at each of our facilities to assure compliance with environmental laws and regulations, and are currently not aware of any ongoing issues of this nature, we cannot be certain that our operations or activities, or historical operations by others at our locations, will not result in civil or criminal enforcement actions or private actions that could have a materially adverse effect on our business. We have, in the past, and may, in the future, purchase or lease properties with unresolved potential violations of federal or state environmental regulations. In these transactions, we have been successful in obtaining sufficient indemnification and mitigating the impact of the issues

without recognizing significant expenses associated with litigation and cleanup. However, purchasing or leasing these properties requires us to weigh the cost of resolving these issues and the likelihood of litigation against the potential economic and business benefits of the transaction. If we fail to correctly identify, resolve and obtain indemnification against these risks, they could have a material adverse impact on our financial position.

Our raw materials and manufacturing process involve a risk of fire loss or disruption. We have recently experienced three fires. In April 2006, a manufacturing facility in Texas was destroyed by fire. In July 2007, a manufacturing facility in Bartow, Florida was destroyed by fire. In 2008 a manufacturing facility in Auburn, Pennsylvania was damaged by fire. To date we have been able to mitigate the effects of fires and floods by transferring manufacturing, warehousing and shipping to other facilities. Our management has advised us that to date we have been insured against the losses caused by such fires. Although we intend to increase security and increase fire protection equipment at our facilities, another major fire could occur and materially affect our operations. Furthermore, there is no assurance that we will be able to maintain business interruption, loss of income and physical damage insurance in sufficient amounts to fully recoup losses caused by fire or other natural disasters. It is an event of default under our credit facility with Bank of America if we are not fully insured for any loss, theft, damage or destruction to our assets, subject to agreeable insurance deductibles, that exceeds $200.

Covenants in our credit facilities could restrict our ability to borrow additional funds, which could impair the improvement and expansion of our operations

Certain covenants in our credit facility with Bank of America restrict the types and amounts of additional indebtedness that we may incur. In addition, the credit facility contains specific financial covenants. These restrictions could inhibit our ability to improve and expand our operations. Our credit facility with Bank of America matures in October 2011. There is no assurance that we will be able to maintain covenant compliance, negotiate extensions to this credit facility or find a replacement credit facility on comparable terms. We pledged substantially all of our assets as security for the Bank of America credit facility.

A significant amount of our leased physical facilities are owned by an affiliate of Mr. Amerson and a substantial number of our shares are pledged to a financial institution.

We are currently the lessee under a series of ~~five (5)~~four (4) real estate operating leases for approximately ~~836,000~~776,000 square feet of warehousing, shipping and manufacturing facilities, expiring between 2019 and 2028 with Wal-Pat II, LLC (“Wal-Pat”), an entity owned by Robert R. Amerson. Mr. Amerson was our CEO and Chairman of our Board of Directors but recently retired. He beneficially owns approximately ~~29.0%~~26.4% of our outstanding common shares as of ~~June~~September 30, 2009. Mr. Amerson acquired Mr. Clark’s interest in Wal-Pat as part of the Settlement and Mutual Release with Mr. Clark, as described below.

Our aggregate monthly base lease payment obligation to Wal-Pat is approximately ~~$267,000.~~$236. Our total remaining aggregate obligation under the Wal-Pat operating leases is approximately ~~$44,586,000.~~$37,245. These amounts exclude any obligations for payment of real estate taxes and repairs and maintenance, which are our responsibility as the lessee.

In September 2007, we entered into a Master Lease Modification Agreement with Wal-Pat, which requires Wal-Pat to notify us at least thirty (30) days in advance of any future proposed sale of any of the premises or a proposed sale of a majority of the equity interests in Wal-Pat. In such event, we have the right to accept, renegotiate or terminate the leases. We were granted a future right of first refusal in connection with a sale of any of the leased Wal-Pat facilities. In the event of a future sale of Flanders, which includes a merger, sale of substantially all of our assets or acquisition of greater than 50% of our shares, by a party other than Mr. Amerson, then Flanders is granted the right to terminate or renegotiate the terms of the Wal-Pat leases. We also have a fair market value purchase option for the facilities we lease from Wal-Pat.

A default by us under the terms of any of these leases or a default by Wal-Pat, or Mr. Amerson, as guarantor on their obligations to BB&T, the financial institution which holds mortgages and deeds of trust on these properties, could adversely affect our leasehold interests in these properties. Mr. Amerson has pledged 5,128,103 of our common shares as security to BB&T in order to facilitate the financings to Wal-Pat, other personal loans, and the acquisition of Mr. Clark’s shares.

In October 2007, we entered into a Settlement Agreement and Mutual Release, effective as of September 30, 2007 (“Settlement Agreement”), by and between Mr. Clark, our former CFO, Mr. Amerson, Mr. Smith and Wal-Pat. A copy of the Settlement Agreement was filed as an exhibit to our Form 8-K, dated October 5, 2007, to which reference is hereby made. In connection with the Settlement Agreement, Mr. Smith and Mr. Amerson each acquired 755,183 of our common shares from Mr. Clark at a purchase price of $4.60 per share. Mr. Smith and Mr. Amerson pledged these shares to BB&T, who provided financing for the acquisition of these shares.

A default by either Mr. Amerson or Mr. Smith under their loan obligations to BB&T could result in BB&T foreclosing upon our shares, which could adversely affect the market price of our common stock and substantially reduce our key management’s equity ownership interest. We filed a Form S-3 registering 5,118,103 shares of our common stock pledged to BB&T by Mr. Amerson. We are not currently aware of any events of default under the financial documents between Wal-Pat, Mr. Amerson, Mr. Smith, and BB&T.

Because of the foregoing factors, as well as other variables affecting our operating results, past financial performance should not be considered a reliable indicator of future performance, and investors should not use historical trends to anticipate results or trends in future periods.

The preceding discussion should be read in conjunction with our annual report on Form 10-K, which also includes additional “Factors That May Affect Future Results” which are still applicable during the current period.

The Company held its annual meeting of shareholders on September 24, 2009. During the meeting, holders of 24,303,742 shares, representing ninety-three percent (93%) of the 26,132,838 shares outstanding on the record date, attended either in person or by proxy. Below is a tabulation of the votes:

As a result of the meeting, Messrs. Smith, Dominick, Korn, and Mock were elected for an additional one-year term as directors.

During the second quarter 2009, Flanders Corporation acquired furnace filter equipment and inventory of Wildwood Industries, Inc. for $3.6 million. Flanders then immediately sold unrelated assets to R.P.S Products, Inc. for $2.2 million.

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.


531 Flanders Filters Road, Washington, NC		27889
(Address of principal executive offices)		(Zip Code)


		Page
PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1 -

Financial Statements

Consolidated Condensed Balance Sheets for ~~June~~September 30, 2009 (unaudited) and December 31, 2008		3

Consolidated Condensed Statements of Operations (unaudited) for the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2009 and 2008		4

Consolidated Condensed Statements of Stockholders’ Equity for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2009 (unaudited) and the year ended December 31, 2008		5

Consolidated Condensed Statements of Cash Flows (unaudited) for the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2009 and 2008		6

Notes to Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements (unaudited)		78

Item 2 -

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations		1112

Item 3 -

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk		1617

Item 4 -

Controls and Procedures		1617

PART II - OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1 - Legal Proceedings		1617

Item 1A - Risk Factors		1618

Item 2 - Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds		2122

Item 3 - Defaults Upon Senior Securities		2122

Item 4 - Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders		2122

Item 5 - Other Information		2122

Item 6 - Exhibits		2123

SIGNATURES		2223


PROPOSALS	SHARES FOR	SHARES ABSTAIN/WITHHOLD
Election of Harry Smith	23,606,718	697,024
Election of David Mock	14,020,637	10,283,105
Election of Jeff Korn	14,826,989	9,476,753
Election of Kirk Dominick	23,576,693	727,049


Exhibit No.		Description

31.1		Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a).

31.2		Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a).

32		Certification of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002.

99.1		~~Twentieth~~Twenty first Amendment to Loan and Security Agreement, dated ~~July 29,~~September 23, 2009, by and among Flanders Corporation, Flanders/Precisionaire Corp., Flanders Filters, Inc., Flanders/CSC Corporation, Precisionaire, Inc., Precisionaire of Utah, Inc., Eco-Air Products, Inc., Air Seal Filter Housings, Inc., Flanders Realty Corp. and Bank of America (filed herewith).


	Three Months Ended September 30,			Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2009		2008	2009			2008
SUPPLEMENTAL SCHEDULE OF NONCASH INVESTING AND FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Sale of equipment for note receivable	249		332		664		747

Purchase of building with debt	4,600		—		6,080		—

Sale of building for note receivable	—		—		200		—

Cashless exercise of common stock	(2,500	)	—		(2,500	)	(370	)

Note Receivable in lieu of account receivable trade	—		—		—		677

Offset of accrued expenses against other receivables	—		—		—		900

Offset of accrued expenses against trade accounts receivable	2,218		2,766		8,057		11,591


DISPOSAL OF COMPANIES
Working Capital surplus disposed, net of cash and cash equivalents disposed	—		—		—		1,425
Fair value of other assets disposed, principally property and equipment	—		—		—		8,637
Goodwill disposed	—		—		—		589
Minority interest	—		—		—		141

	—		—	$	—		10,792


Period	(a) Total Number of Shares (or Units) Purchased	(b) Average Price Paid per Share (or Unit)	(c) Total Number of Shares (or Units) Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs *	(d) Maximum Number (or Approximate Dollar Value) of Shares (or Units) that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs
~~Apr~~July 1 – ~~Apr 30, 2009~~	—	—	—	~~1,147,465~~
~~May 1 – May~~July 31, 2009	—	—	—	1,147,465
~~Jun~~Aug 1 – ~~Jun~~Aug 31, 2009	—	—	—	1,147,465
Sept 1 – Sept 30, 2009	—	—	—	1,147,465
Total	—	—	—	1,147,465


FLANDERS CORPORATION

By:		/~~s/ Harry Smith~~ S/ HARRY SMITH
		Harry Smith
		Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer
		(Principal Executive Officer)

By:		/~~s/ John Oakley~~ S/ JOHN OAKLEY
		John Oakley
		Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)

Large accelerated filer

Accelerated filer

Non-accelerated filer

Smaller reporting company