The accompanying notes are an integral part of the

condensed consolidated financial statements.

CHASE GENERAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(Unaudited)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the

condensed consolidated financial statements.

CHASE GENERAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

NOTE 1 - GENERAL

The condensed consolidated balance sheet of Chase General Corporation (hereinafter referred to as “Chase”, “we”, “our”, and “us”) at June 30, 20092010 has been taken from audited consolidated financial statements at that date and condensed. The condensed consolidated financial statements as of and for the three months and nine months ended March 31,September 30, 2010 and for the three months and nine months ended March 31,September 30, 2009 are unaudited and reflect all normal and recurring accruals and adjustments which are, in the opinion of management, necessary for a fair presentation of the financial position, operating results and cash flows for the interim periods presented in this quarterly report. The condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto, together with management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations, contained in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2009.2010. The results of operations for the three and nine months ended March 31, 2010 and cash flows for the ninethree months ended March 31,September 30, 2010 are not necessarily indicative of the results for the entire fiscal year ending June 30, 2010.2011. Where appropriate, items within the condensed consolidated financial statements have been reclassified from the previous periods’ presentation. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring adjustments) considered necessary to fairly present financial position, results of operations and cash flows for the periods have been included.

Pursuant to SFASDuring the third quarter 2010, Chase adopted FASB ASU No. 168,“2010-06 Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (Topic 820). This ASU requires new disclosures for transfers in and out of Levels 1 and 2, and Activity in Level 3 fair value measurements. The FASB Accounting Standards Codificationupdate also clarifies the level disaggregation and the Hierarchydisclosures about inputs and valuation techniques. The new disclosures and clarifications of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles – a replacement of FASB Statement No. 162”, the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) (FASB ASC 105) became the sole source of authoritative U.S. GAAPexisting disclosures are effective for interim and annual reporting periods endingbeginning after SeptemberDecember 15, 2009, except2009. The requirement related to Level 3 fair value measurements is effective for rulesthe Company for interim and interpretive releasesannual reporting periods beginning after January 28, 2011. The adoption of the SEC, which are sourceseffective portions of authoritative GAAP for SEC registrants. The Company adopted this new standard duringdid not have a material impact on the first quarter of 2009. Reference to specific accounting standards in the footnotes to ourCompany’s consolidated financial statements have been changed to referand the Company does not expect a material impact on its consolidated financial statements related to the appropriate section of the ASC.Level 3 fair value disclosures.

In June 2009, the FASB issued new guidance on the consolidation of variable interest entities (“VIE”) in response to concerns about the application of certain key provisions of pre-existing guidance, including those regarding the transparency of the involvement with a VIE. Specifically, this new guidance requires a qualitative approach to identifying a controlling financial interest in a VIE and requires ongoing assessment of whether an entity is a VIE and whether an interest in a VIE makes the holder the primary beneficiary of the VIE.VIE and whether an entity is a VIE when a triggering event occurs. In addition, this new guidance requires additional disclosures about the involvement with a VIE and any significant changes in risk exposure due to that involvement. This new guidance is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2009. We plan to adoptThe Company adopted the new guidance in the first quarter of fiscal year 2011, and dowhich did not expecthave a material impact on ourits consolidated financial statements.

During the third quarter, Chase adopted FASB accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2010-09, Amendments to Certain Recognition and Disclosure Requirements, which amends ASC 855, Subsequent Events. This ASU removes the requirement for an SEC filer to disclose a date through which subsequent events have been evaluated. This change removes potential conflicts with SEC requirements.

CHASE GENERAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

NOTE 2 - NET INCOME (LOSS) PER SHARE

The income per share was computed on the weighted average of outstanding common shares during the period. Diluted earnings per share is calculated by including contingently issuable shares with the weighted average shares outstanding.

Cumulative Preferred Stock dividends in arrears at March 31,September 30, 2010 and 2009, totaled $7,148,356$7,212,392 and $7,020,284,$7,084,320, respectively. Total dividends in arrears, on a per share basis, consist of the following at March 31:September 30:

CHASE GENERAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

NOTE 2 - NET INCOME (LOSS) PER SHARE (CONTINUED)

The 6% convertible prior cumulative preferred stock may, upon thirty days prior notice, be redeemed by the Corporation at $5.25 a share plus unpaid accrued dividends to date of redemption. In the event of voluntary liquidation, holders of this stock are entitled to receive $5.25 per share plus accrued dividends. It may be exchanged for common stock at the option of the shareholders in the ratio of 4 common shares for one share of Series A and 3.75 common shares for one share of Series B.

The Company has the privilege of redemption of 5% convertible cumulative preferred stock at $21.00 a share plus unpaid accrued dividends. In the event of voluntary or involuntary liquidation, holders of this stock are entitled to receive $20.00 a share plus unpaid accrued dividends. It may be exchanged for common stock at the option of the shareholders, in the ratio of 3.795 common shares for one share of preferred.preferred stock.

NOTE 3 - FORGIVABLE LOAN AND DEFERRED INCOME

During 2004, the Company received a $25,000 economic development incentive from Buchanan County, which is a five year forgivable loan at a rate of $5,000 per year. The Nodaway Valley Bank established an Irrevocable Standby Letter of Credit in the amount of $25,000 as collateral for this loan, with a maturity date of January 3, 2010. The Company met the criteria of occupying a 20,000 square foot building and creating a minimum of two new full-time equivalent jobs during the first year of operation in the new facility. In addition, the Company maintained 19 existing jobs during the five year term. Notice was received February 6, 2009 from the Buchanan County Commission, that the Company had fulfilled its minimum loan requirements so that the loan was forgiven in full with no further obligations. Since the Company was no longer legally required to return the monies, the liability was reclassified as deferred revenue and amortized into income over the life of the lease term of the new facility. At June 30, 2009, aA total of $25,000 washas been reclassified to deferred revenue. Deferred revenue is recognized on a straight-line basis over the lease term of 20 years. During the ninethree months ended March 31,September 30, 2010 and 2009, deferred revenue of $973 and $975, respectively,$324 was amortized into income for each period.

NOTE 4 - NOTES PAYABLE

The Company’s long-term debt consists of:

CHASE GENERAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

NOTE 4 - NOTES PAYABLE (CONTINUED)

The Company’s long-term debt consists of:

Future minimum payments are:

NOTE 5 - NOTE PAYABLE - LINE-OF-CREDIT

Effective June 30, 2010, the Company had a $250,000 line-of-credit agreement which will expire on January 3, 2011. Currently, the interest rate is 5.5% and is collateralized by certain equipment. At September 30, 2010 and June 30, 2010, the outstanding balance on the line-of-credit was $40,000 and $-0-, respectively.

CHASE GENERAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

NOTE 5 - NOTE PAYABLE - BANK

Effective June 30, 2009, the Company had a $250,000 line-of-credit agreement which expired on January 3, 2010. The line-of-credit agreement was renewed on that date to extend until January 3, 2011 with a variable interest rate at prime. The line-of-credit is collateralized by certain equipment. At March 31, 2010 and June 30, 2009, there was no outstanding balance on the line-of-credit.

NOTE 6 - INCOME TAXES

The recognition of income tax expense related to uncertain tax positions is determined under the provisions of FASB ASC - 740-10. The Company had no unrecognized tax benefits as of the date of adoption, the income tax positions taken for open years are appropriately stated and supported for all open years. The Company’s federal tax returns for the fiscal years ended 2008, 2009 and 2010 are subject to examination by the IRS taxing authority.

As of JuneSeptember 30, 2009,2010, the Company had a net operating loss carryforward of approximately $4,512 andhas unused contributions carryforward of $874$1,400 of which the Company’s profit for the ninethree months ended March 31,September 30, 2010 absorbeddid not fully absorb these amounts.

NOTE 7 - SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION

CHASE GENERAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY

ITEM 2. - MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF  OPERATIONS

OVERVIEW

Chase General Corporation (Chase) is a holding company for its wholly-owned subsidiary, Dye Candy Company. This subsidiary is the main operating company that is engaged in the manufacture of confectionery products which are sold primarily to wholesale houses, grocery accounts, vendors, and repackers. The subsidiary (Company) operates two divisions, Chase Candy division and Seasonal Candy division, which share a common labor force and utilize the same basic equipment and raw materials. Therefore, segment reporting for the two divisions is not maintained by Management.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS - Three Months Ended March 31,September 30, 2010 Compared withto the Three Months Ended March 31, 2009 and Nine Months Ended March 31, 2010 Compared with Nine Months Ended March 31,September 30, 2009

The following management comments regarding Chase’s results of operations and outlook should be read in conjunction with the condensed consolidated financial statements included pursuant to Item 1 of the quarterly report.

The following table sets forth certain items as a percentage of net sales and revenues for the periods presented:

CHASE GENERAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY

ITEM 2. - MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF  OPERATIONS (CONTINUED)

NET SALES

Net sales increased $46,877$7,945 or 12%1% for the three months ended March 31,September 30, 2010 from $760,891 to $441,877 compared to $395,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2009.$768,836. Gross sales for Chase Candy division decreased $4,060$16,496 from $442,045 to $392,532 for the three months ended March 31, 2010 compared to $396,592 for 2009.$425,549. Gross sales for Seasonal Candy division increased $49,220$30,006 from $333,366 to $56,994$363,372.

The decrease in gross sales, for the three months ended March 31, 2010 compared to $7,774 for 2009.

Net sales decreased $69,952 or 3% for the nine months ended March 31, 2010 to $2,483,890 compared to $2,553,842 for the nine months ended March 31, 2009. Gross sales for Chase Candy decreased $30,951 to $1,290,358 for the nine months ended March 31, 2010 compared to $1,321,309 for 2009. Gross sales for Seasonal Candy decreased $45,469 to $1,223,114 for the nine months ended March 31, 2010 compared to $1,290,358 for 2009.

The net 12% sales increase of $46,877 for the three months ended March 31, 2010, over the same period ended March 31, 2009 is primarily due to orders from a new customer. In addition, sales returns and allowances decreased $5,120 or 31% from $16,614 for the three months ended March 31, 2009 to $11,495 for the three months ended March 31, 2010.

The 3% decrease in net sales of $69,952 for the nine month period ended March 31,September 30, 2010 overfor the same period ended March 31, 2009Chase Candy division, is primarily due to reducedone customer reducing orders from several customers and discontinuation of the Mini Mash Limited Addition Tin. Additionally, during 2009, the Company increased pricing and was unable to do soby approximately $17,500. The increase in 2010. Seasonalgross sales for the nine monthsSeasonal Candy division is due to timing of shipping bulk orders netting approximately $30,000 that were reduced approximately $90,000 from loss of a customer, but this loss was offset by additional sales of $48,000 fromshipped in the clamshell product line.second quarter last year.

COST OF SALES

The costCost of sales increased $50,651 to $382,473 increasing to 87%$29,957 from $487,663 or 64% of related revenues for the three months ended March 31, 2010, comparedSeptember 30, 2009, to $331,822$517,620 or 84%67% of related revenues for the three months ended March 31, 2009. The cost of sales decreased $29,203 to $1,731,120 increasing to 70% of related revenues for the nine months ended March 31, 2010, compared to $1,760,323 or 69% of related revenues for the nine months ended March 31, 2009.September 30, 2010.

The increase in cost of sales of $29,957 is a 6% increase. Increases included: direct cost of materials of 18% from $379,641 for the three months ended March 31, 2010 is a 15% increase from the three months ended March 31, 2009. Direct costs of goods for materials manufactured and production labor force increased $19,920September 30, 2009 to $225,223$449,594 for the three months ended March 31,September 30, 2010 as compareda result of increased prices for sugar, peanuts and chocolate of which were not passed along to $205,303customers. Freight in/out increased 30% from $41,855 for the three months ended March 31,September 30, 2009 which isto $54,205 for the three months ended September 30, 2010 as a result of having to ship product using refrigeration services since summer temperatures were too high to not use these services. A new plant manager hired in the prior year to replace the manager who retired in December 2009 was a bonus awardresult of indirect labor costs decreasing $13,232 or 18% from $72,304 for the three months ended September 30, 2009 to $59,072 for the three months ended September 30, 2010. Occupancy costs increased $11,984 or 17% from $71,928 for the three months ended September 30, 2009 to $83,912 for the three months ended September 30, 2010 as a long time retiring employee.result of rising costs for utilities, machinery depreciation and insurance. Change in goods-in-process and finished goods inventory increased $55,794 or 27% from $205,580 for the three months ended September 30, 2009 to $261,374 for the three months ended September 30, 2010 as a result of building up finished goods for product to be delivered in October 2010.

SELLING EXPENSE

Selling expense for the three months ended September 30, 2010 increased $9,012 from $71,913 or 9% of sales, to $80,925 or 11% of sales for the three months ended September 30, 2010. The increase in selling expenses is due to increased commissions, sample and advertising costs. Commissions’ sample and advertising costs increased 25% to $33,004 for this period from $26,504 for the three months ended September 30, 2009.

CHASE GENERAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY

ITEM 2. - MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF  OPERATIONS (CONTINUED)

COST OF SALES (CONTINUED)GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSE

Direct costs of goods for materials manufacturedGeneral and production labor force for the nine months ended March 31, 2010, decreased $58,884 to $1,150,801 as compared to $1,209,685 for the nine months ended March 31, 2009, which is a result of no raw material price increases. In addition, new transportation vendors were used which resulted in a decrease of 18% in freight costs from $145,014 for the nine months ended March 31, 2009 to $119,123 for the nine months ended March 31, 2010.

The Company decreased finished goods inventoryadministrative expense for the three months ended March 31, 2010 to $58,058 or 51% from the JuneSeptember 30, 2009 finished goods inventory of $119,116 due to the end of the Company’s busy season. Raw material inventory of $112,075 and packaging materials inventory of $187,534 is 23% higher than the June 30, 2009 inventories of $69,960 raw material and $172,764 packaging materials as a result of purchasing inventory to take advantage of favorable pricing, but not all of this inventory was used during the third quarter ending March 31, 2010.

SELLING EXPENSES

Selling expenses for the three months ended March 31, 2010 decreased $7,532 to $58,946, which is 13% of sales, compared to $66,478 or 17% of sales for the three months ended March 31, 2009. Selling expenses for the nine months ended March 31, 2010 decreased $30,718 to $266,315, which is 11% of sales, compared to $297,033 or 12% of sales for the nine months ended March 31, 2009.

The decrease of $7,532 in selling expenses for the three months ended March 31, 2010 is due to lower commissions, premium promotions and sample costs for the period. Commissions, premium promotions, and sample costs decreased 48% to $14,584 for this period from $28,047 for the three months ended March 31, 2009.

The decrease of $30,718 in selling expenses for the nine months ended March 31, 2010 is also due to lower commissions, premium promotions and sample costs for this period. Commissions, premium promotions, and sample costs decreased 23% to $138,178 for this period from $178,644 for the nine months ended March 31, 2009.

GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES

General and administrative expenses for the three months ended March 31, 2010 increased $1,979 to $66,846, which is$5,602 from $114,725 or 15% of sales, compared to $64,867$120,327 or 16% of sales for the three months ended March 31, 2009. General and administrative expensesSeptember 30, 2010, primarily for the nine months ended March 31, 2010 increased $15,980 to $260,806, which is 10% of sales, compared to $244,826 or 10% of sales for the nine months ended March 31, 2009. The increased costs are primarily because of a $16,936 increaseincreases in employee health insurance, and directors insurance.

CHASE GENERAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY

ITEM 2. - MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (CONTINUED)

website and miscellaneous expenses.

OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE)

Other income and (expense) decreasedincreased by $811$1,587 for the three months ended March 31,September 30, 2010 from $(809), to $(834), compared to $(23)$(2,396) for the three months ended March 31, 2009. Other income and expense increased by $1,820 for the nine months ended March 31,September 30, 2010 to $(2,820), compared to $(4,640) for the nine months ended March 31, 2009. This was primarily due to a decreasean increase in interest expense since there was no stockholder note payable during the current year.expense.

PROVISION (BENEFIT) FOR INCOME TAXES

The Company recorded a tax (benefit)expense for the three months ended March 31,September 30, 2010 of $(26,600)$8,694 as compared to $(36,717)the tax expense of $21,211 for the three months ended March 31, 2009. The Company recorded a tax provision for the nine months ended March 31, 2010 of $82,022 as compared to $40,076 for the nine months ended March 31,September 30, 2009. The net tax expense recorded for the ninethree months ended March 31,September 30, 2010 and 2009 is primarily due to recognizing taxes related to current profitable operations.

NET INCOME

The Company had incurred losses in the years ending June 30, 2007 and 2008, which was not available to carry back to obtain previously paidreported net income taxes. These losses were utilized against taxable income for the nine months ended March 31, 2009. The net change in deferred taxes for the three months and nineended September 30, 2010 of $39,374, compared to $64,570 for the three months ended March 31, 2010 was $1,943 and $4,672, respectively.

NET INCOME (LOSS)

The Company reported a net loss for the quarter ended March 31, 2010 of $(40,622), compared to a net loss of $(24,711) for the quarter ended March 31, 2009. This increase in losses of $15,911 is explained above.

The Company reported a net income for the nine months ended March 31, 2010 of $140,807, compared to a net income of $218,958 for the nine months ended March 31,September 30, 2009. This decrease of $78,151$25,126 is explained above.

PREFERRED DIVIDENDS

These amounts reflectPreferred dividends were $32,018 for the three months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009 which reflects additional preferred stock dividends in arrears for the three and nine months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively, on the Company’s Series A and Series B $5 par value preferred stock and its Series A and Series B $20 par value preferred stock.

NET INCOME APPLICABLE TO COMMON STOCKHOLDERS

Net income applicable to common stockholders was $7,356 for the three months ended September 30, 2010 compared to $32,552 for the three months ended September 30, 2009 for the reasons discussed above.

CHASE GENERAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY

ITEM 2. - MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF  OPERATIONS (CONTINUED)

NET INCOME APPLICABLE TO COMMON STOCKHOLDERS

Net (loss) applicable to common stockholders for the three months ended March 31, 2010 was $(72,640), which is an increase in losses of $15,911 as compared to the three months ended March 31, 2009 of $(56,729).

Net income applicable to common stockholders for the nine months ended March 31, 2010 was $44,753 which is a decrease of $78,151 as compared to the nine months ended March 31, 2009 of $122,904. These items are explained above.

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

As of September 30, 2010, Chase had $58,406 in cash and cash equivalents compared to $106,508 as of June 30, 2010 and $70,277 as of September 30, 2009. Management had to draw $40,000 from its line-of-credit, since this is the start of busy season for Chase as reflected in increased receivables of $220,204, inventories of $179,576, and accounts payable of $233,163.

The table below presents the summary of cash flow for the fiscal period indicated.

The $2,574$851 of cash used in investing activities was the result of capital expenditures. Management has approximately $226,000 commitmentno material commitments for capital expenditures during the remainder of fiscal 2010 of which $110,507 has been paid to date as the equipment is being built with expectation to be placed in service by June 30, 2010. Management secured financing for $160,050 effective January 4, 2010 towards this commitment and the balance will be paid with cash funds held by the Company.

2011. The $121,585$25,460 of cash used inprovided by financing activities includesis the receipt of $210,000$40,000 drawn from itsthe line-of-credit which was paid in full asnet of December 31, 2009,principal payments on theequipment and vehicle loans of $21,969 and receipt of $143,554 from the financing committed January 4, 2010.loans. Management believes that the projected cash flow from operations, combined with its existing cash balances, will be sufficient to meet its funding requirements for the foreseeable future. Chase does have $250,000$210,000 remaining on its bank line-of-credit, which could be utilized to help fund any working capital requirements.

Management believes that inflation will have only a minimal effect on future operations since such effects will be offset by sales price increases, which are not expected to have a significant effect upon demand.

CHASE GENERAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY

ITEM 2. - MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (CONTINUED)

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Use of Estimates

The preparation of the condensed consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect certain reported amounts and disclosures. Significant estimates used in preparing these condensed consolidated financial statements include those assumed in computing the carrying value of equipment and allowance for doubtful trade receivables.accounts receivable. Accordingly, actual results could differ from those estimates. Any changes in estimates are recorded in the period in which they become known.

CHASE GENERAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY

ITEM 2. - MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF  OPERATIONS (CONTINUED)

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED)

Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The Company’s financial instruments consist principally of cash and cash equivalents, trade receivables and payables, and notes payable. There are no significant differences between the carrying value and fair value of any of these consolidated financial instruments. As of September 30, 2010, the amount of the Company’s long-term debt approximates fair value based on the present value of estimated future cash flows using a discount rate commensurate with a borrowing rate available to the Company.

Credit Risk

Financial instruments that potentially subject Chase to concentrations of credit risk consist principally of cash and accounts receivable. Chase grants unsecured credit to substantially all of its customers. Management does not believe that it is exposed to any extraordinary credit risk as a result of this policy. Chase deposits all monies at the Nodaway Valley Bank. These accounts are insured up to $250,000 by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. Chase has not experienced any losses in such accounts. Management does not believe Chase is exposed to any significant credit risk with respect to its cash and cash equivalents.

Revenue Recognition

The Company recognizes revenues as product is shipped to the customers. Net sales are comprised of the total sales billed during the period including shipping and handling charges to customers, less the estimated returns, customer allowances and customer discounts.

Allowance for Doubtful Accounts

The carrying amount of accounts receivable is reduced by a valuation allowance that reflects management’s best estimate of amounts that will not be collected. The allowance for doubtful accounts is based on management’s assessment of the collectabilitycollectibility of specific customer accounts and the aging of the accounts receivable. If there is a deterioration of a major customer’s credit worthiness or actual defaults are higher than the historical experience, management’s estimates of the recoverability of amounts due the Company could be adversely affected. All accounts or portions thereof deemed to be uncollectible or to require an excessive collection cost are written off to the allowance for doubtful accounts.

CHASE GENERAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY

ITEM 2. - MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (CONTINUED)

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED)

Inventories

Inventories are carried at the “lower of cost or market value” with cost being determined on the “first-in, first-out” basis of accounting. Finished goods and goods in process include a provision for manufacturing overhead.

CHASE GENERAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY

ITEM 2. - MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF  OPERATIONS (CONTINUED)

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED)

Property and Equipment

Property and equipment is recorded at cost. The Company’s property and equipment areis being depreciated on straight-line and accelerated methods over the following estimated useful lives:

Cash Flows

For purposes of the statements of cash flows, Chase considers all short-term investments purchased with original maturity dates of three months or less to be cash equivalents.

New Accounting PronouncementsIMPACT OF NEW ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

Pursuant to SFASDuring the third quarter 2010, Chase adopted FASB ASU No. 168,“2010-06 Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (Topic 820). This ASU requires new disclosures for transfers in and out of Levels 1 and 2, and Activity in Level 3 fair value measurements. The FASB Accounting Standards Codificationupdate also clarifies the level disaggregation and the Hierarchydisclosures about inputs and valuation techniques. The new disclosures and clarifications of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles – a replacement of FASB Statement No. 162”, the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) (FASB ASC 105) became the sole source of authoritative U.S. GAAPexisting disclosures are effective for interim and annual reporting periods endingbeginning after SeptemberDecember 15, 2009, except2009. The requirement related to Level 3 fair value measurements is effective for rulesthe Company for interim and interpretive releases of the SEC, which are sources of authoritative GAAP for SEC registrants. The Company adopted this standard during the first quarter of 2009.annual reporting periods beginning after January 29, 2011. The adoption of ASC 105the effective portions of this new standard did not have any effecta material impact on Chase’s results of operations, financial condition and cash flows. The adoption impacted references to specific accounting standards in the footnotes to ourCompany’s consolidated financial statements which have been changed to referand the Company does not expect a material impact on its consolidated financial statements related to the appropriate section of the ASC.

CHASE GENERAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY

ITEM 2. - MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF  OPERATIONS (CONTINUED)

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED)

IMPACT OF NEW ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS (CONTINUED)

During

In June 2009, the third quarter, Chase adopted FASB accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2010-09, Amendmentsissued new guidance on the consolidation of variable interest entities (“VIE”) in response to Certain Recognition and Disclosure Requirements, which amends ASC 855, Subsequent Events. This ASU removesconcerns about the requirement for an SEC filer to disclose a date through which subsequent events have been evaluated. This change removes potential conflicts with SEC requirements.

Effective July 1, 2008, Chase adopted FASB Statementapplication of Financial Accounting Standard No. 159,The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities(FASB ASC 825) – Including an amendmentcertain key provisions of FASBStatement of Financial Accounting Statement No. 115,Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities(FASB ASC 320).ASC 825 permits entities to choose to measure many financial instruments and certain other items at fair value. The objective is to improve financial reporting by providing entities withpre-existing guidance, including those regarding the opportunity to mitigate volatility in reported earnings cause by measuring related assets and liabilities differently without having to apply complex hedge accounting provisions. ASC 825 is expected to expand the use of fair value measurement, which is consistent with the FASB’s long-term measurement objectives for accounting for financial instruments. Mosttransparency of the provisionsinvolvement with a VIE. Specifically, this new guidance requires a qualitative approach to identifying a controlling financial interest in a VIE and requires ongoing assessment of whether an interest in a VIE makes the holder the primary beneficiary of the VIE and whether an entity is a VIE when a triggering event occurs. In addition, this Statement apply onlynew guidance requires additional disclosures about the involvement with a VIE and any significant changes in risk exposure due to entities that electinvolvement. This new guidance is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2009. The Company adopted the fair value option. However,new guidance in the amendment to ASC 320 applies to all entities with available-for-sale and trading securities. The adoptionfirst quarter of ASC 825fiscal year 2011, which did not have any effecta material impact on Chase’s results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.

In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141(R),Business Combinations (FASB ASC 805) and SFAS No. 160,Accounting and Reporting of Noncontrolling Interest in Consolidated Financial Statements(FASB ASC 810). These statements significantly change the accounting for and reporting of business combinations and noncontrolling (minority) interests inits consolidated financial statements. These statements will require noncontrolling interests to be reclassified to equity, consolidated net income to be adjusted to include net income attributed to the noncontrolling interest, and consolidated comprehensive income to be adjusted to include the comprehensive income attributed to the noncontrolling interest. ASC 805 and ASC 810 are required to be adopted simultaneously. ASC 805 is to be applied prospectively to business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after the beginning of the first annual reporting period beginning on or after December 14, 2008. ASC 810 is to be applied prospectively as of the beginning of the fiscal year in which it is initially adopted except for the presentation and disclosure requirements which will be applied retrospectively for all periods. Early adoption is prohibited. The adoption of ASC 805 and ASC 810 did not have any effect on Chase’s results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.

CHASE GENERAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY

ITEM 2. - MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (CONTINUED)

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED)

Forward-Looking Information

This report as well as our other reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) contains forward-looking statements made pursuant to the safe harbor provisions of The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. The words “believe,” “estimate,” “anticipate,” “project,” “intend,” “expect,” “plan,” “outlook,” “forecast,” “may,” “will,” “should,” “continue,” “predict” and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. This report contains forward-looking statements regarding, among other topics, our expected financial position, results of operations, cash flows, strategy, and management’s plans and objectives. Accordingly, these forward-looking statements are based on assumptions about a number of important factors. While we believe that our assumptions about such factors are reasonable, such factors involve risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to be different from what appear here. These risk factors include: the ability to adequately pass through to customers unanticipated future increases in raw material costs, decreased demand for products, expected orders that do not occur, loss of key customers, the impact of competition and price erosion as well as supply and manufacturing constraints, and other risks and uncertainties. In light of these risks and uncertainties, there can be no assurance that the forward-looking information contained in this report will prove accurate, and our actual results may differ materially from these forward-looking statements. We assume no obligation to update any forward-looking statements made herein.

ITEM 3. - QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLSOURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

Not applicable to a smaller reporting company.

CHASE GENERAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY

ITEM 4T. - CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

(a) Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Chase’s management, with the participation of the Chief Executive Officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of Chase’s disclosure controls and procedures, as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as mendedamended (the “Exchange Act”), as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on such evaluation, this officer has concluded that Chase’s disclosure controls and procedures are effective to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed in periodic filings under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to management, including those officers, and to members of the Board of Directors, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

(b) Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

There were no significant changes in Chase’s internal control over financial reporting or in other factors that in management’s estimates are reasonably likely to materially affect Chase’s internal control over financial reporting subsequent to the date of the evaluation.

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

Not applicable to a smaller reporting company.

None

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

				Chase General Corporation and Subsidiary
				Chase General Corporation and Subsidiary (Registrant)
May 14,November 12, 2010				/s/ Barry M. Yantis
Date				By: Barry M. Yantis
				Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer, President and Treasurer

2321