Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer x Accelerated filer ¨ Non-accelerated filer ¨ Smaller reporting company ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No x

As of ~~October~~April 29, ~~2010,~~2011, the number of shares of the Registrant’s common stock outstanding was approximately ~~97.2~~95.5 million shares and the aggregate market value of the common stock outstanding held by non-affiliates based upon the closing price of these shares on the New York Stock Exchange was approximately ~~$7.0~~$8.4 billion.


	Three months ended September 30,						Nine months ended September 30,						Three months ended March 31,
	2010			2009			2010			2009			2011			2010
Net operating revenues	$	1,651,649		$	1,573,915		$	4,797,974		$	4,540,596		$	1,605,958		$	1,559,418
Operating expenses and charges:
Patient care costs		1,146,382			1,095,857			3,339,723			3,153,622			1,115,996			1,082,789
General and administrative		148,041			134,931			421,422			394,370			151,602			137,277
Depreciation and amortization		58,486			56,813			174,307			172,121			62,037			57,468
Provision for uncollectible accounts		43,938			42,021			127,868			119,990			42,289			41,563
Equity investment income		(1,789	)		(708	)		(6,968	)		(1,066	)		(1,519	)		(2,345	)

Total operating expenses and charges		1,395,058			1,328,914			4,056,352			3,839,037			1,370,405			1,316,752

Operating income		256,591			245,001			741,622			701,559			235,553			242,666
Debt expense		(39,490	)		(45,535	)		(127,728	)		(140,924	)		(58,595	)		(44,583	)
Debt redemption charges		—			—			(4,127	)		—
Other income		759			999			2,329			3,026			841			831

Income before income taxes		217,860			200,465			612,096			563,661			177,799			198,914
Income tax expense		74,979			74,195			220,322			209,485			63,047			73,914

Net income		142,881			126,270			391,774			354,176			114,752			125,000
Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests		(23,494	)		(15,340	)		(55,111	)		(41,216	)		(20,250	)		(15,577	)

Net income attributable to DaVita Inc.	$	119,387		$	110,930		$	336,663		$	312,960		$	94,502		$	109,423

Earnings per share:
Basic earnings per share attributable to DaVita Inc.	$	1.16		$	1.07		$	3.27		$	3.01		$	0.98		$	1.05

Diluted earnings per share attributable to DaVita Inc.	$	1.15		$	1.06		$	3.22		$	3.00		$	0.96		$	1.04

Weighted average shares for earnings per share:
Basic		102,608,844			104,127,334			102,989,010			103,904,768			96,263,802			103,364,869

Diluted		104,022,458			104,607,318			104,408,939			104,315,019			98,378,371			104,765,600


	September 30, 2010			December 31, 2009			March 31, 2011			December 31, 2010
ASSETS
Cash and cash equivalents	$	534,565		$	539,459		$	1,006,010		$	860,117
Short-term investments		22,945			26,475			23,006			23,003
Accounts receivable, less allowance of $244,176 and $229,317		1,082,676			1,105,903
Accounts receivable, less allowance of $227,651 and $235,629								1,069,437			1,048,976
Inventories		68,950			70,041			69,641			76,008
Other receivables		249,445			263,456			277,065			304,366
Other current assets		38,798			40,234			46,342			43,994
Income tax receivables		44,284			—			10,419			40,330
Deferred income taxes		220,342			256,953			224,996			226,060

Total current assets		2,262,005			2,302,521			2,726,916			2,622,854
Property and equipment, net		1,121,604			1,104,925			1,183,744			1,170,808
Amortizable intangibles, net		124,217			136,732			156,614			162,635
Equity investments		25,679			22,631			24,498			25,918
Long-term investments		8,049			7,616			8,434			8,848
Other long-term assets		32,428			32,615			40,659			32,054
Goodwill		4,053,123			3,951,196			4,182,076			4,091,307

	$	7,627,105		$	7,558,236		$	8,322,941		$	8,114,424

LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
Accounts payable	$	321,179		$	176,657		$	227,401		$	181,033
Other liabilities		337,221			461,092			352,490			342,943
Accrued compensation and benefits		357,132			286,121			352,931			325,477
Current portion of long-term debt		96,252			100,007			74,551			74,892
Income taxes payable		—			23,064

Total current liabilities		1,111,784			1,046,941			1,007,373			924,345
Long-term debt		3,266,190			3,532,217			4,218,201			4,233,850
Other long-term liabilities		89,919			87,692			86,615			89,290
Alliance and product supply agreement, net		26,650			30,647			23,985			25,317
Deferred income taxes		387,717			334,855			443,878			421,436

Total liabilities		4,882,260			5,032,352			5,780,052			5,694,238
Commitments and contingencies
Noncontrolling interests subject to put provisions		368,369			331,725			405,988			383,052
Equity:
Preferred stock ($0.001 par value, 5,000,000 shares authorized; none issued)
Common stock ($0.001 par value, 450,000,000 shares authorized; 134,862,283 shares issued; 101,330,359 and 103,062,698 shares outstanding)		135			135
Common stock ($0.001 par value, 450,000,000 shares authorized; 134,862,283 shares issued; 96,395,372 and 96,001,535 shares outstanding)								135			135
Additional paid-in capital		631,062			621,685			618,362			620,546
Retained earnings		2,648,797			2,312,134			2,812,319			2,717,817
Treasury stock, at cost (33,531,924 and 31,799,585 shares)		(958,680	)		(793,340	)
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)		119			(5,548	)
Treasury stock, at cost (38,466,911 and 38,860,748 shares)								(1,354,744	)		(1,360,579	)
Accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income								(1,677	)		503

Total DaVita Inc. shareholders’ equity		2,321,433			2,135,066			2,074,395			1,978,422
Noncontrolling interests not subject to put provisions		55,043			59,093			62,506			58,712

Total equity		2,376,476			2,194,159			2,136,901			2,037,134

	$	7,627,105		$	7,558,236		$	8,322,941		$	8,114,424


	Nine months ended September 30,						Three months ended March 31,
	2010			2009			2011			2010
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income	$	391,774		$	354,176		$	114,752		$	125,000
Adjustments to reconcile net income to cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization		174,307			172,121			62,037			57,468
Stock-based compensation expense		33,492			33,850			9,716			10,233
Tax benefits from stock award exercises		15,755			12,434			13,868			7,873
Excess tax benefits from stock award exercises		(2,079	)		(8,115	)		(7,196	)		(1,378	)
Deferred income taxes		61,499			45,417			18,221			(3,311	)
Equity investment income, net		(3,048	)		(1,066	)		1,420			(1,334	)
Loss on disposal of assets and other non-cash charges		5,650			15,323
Debt redemption charges		4,127			—
Loss (gain) on disposal of assets and other non-cash charges								5,506			(695	)
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, other than from acquisitions and divestitures:
Accounts receivable		21,680			(68,235	)		(20,461	)		594
Inventories		3,041			15,858			7,429			1,818
Other receivables and other current assets		16,596			(2,164	)		24,922			44,343
Other long-term assets		187			5,641			990			(782	)
Accounts payable		95,350			(58,995	)		26,565			1,800
Accrued compensation and benefits		72,501			20,733			31,542			17,349
Other current liabilities		(118,305	)		(68,383	)		9,483			(45,063	)
Income taxes		(55,703	)		55,226			29,878			47,617
Other long-term liabilities		2,308			(9,702	)		1,111			315

Net cash provided by operating activities		719,132			514,119			329,783			261,847

Cash flows from investing activities:
Additions of property and equipment		(169,376	)		(205,653	)
Additions of property and equipment, net								(67,530	)		(42,585	)
Acquisitions		(137,643	)		(64,001	)		(81,523	)		(1,069	)
Proceeds from asset sales		18,471			6,256			2,812			16,264
Purchase of investments available for sale		(955	)		(1,737	)		(298	)		(521	)
Purchase of investments held-to-maturity		(23,540	)		(16,942	)		(15,161	)		(12,522	)
Proceeds from sale of investments available for sale		900			16,537			1,149			880
Proceeds from maturities of investments held-to-maturity		26,916			16,123			15,163			15,990
Purchase of equity investments and other assets		(436	)		(260	)		—			(350	)
Distributions received on equity investments		350			929			—			350

Net cash used in investing activities		(285,313	)		(248,748	)		(145,388	)		(23,563	)

Cash flows from financing activities:
Borrowings		14,736,519			13,924,642			10,983,125			4,877,000
Payments on long-term debt		(15,006,754	)		(13,961,667	)		(11,000,635	)		(4,902,041	)
Debt call premium		(3,314	)		—
Purchase of treasury stock		(148,669	)		(61,223	)
Interest rate cap premiums and other deferred financing costs								(13,399	)		—
Distributions to noncontrolling interests								(22,187	)		(18,658	)
Stock award exercises and other share issuances, net								3,410			21,073
Excess tax benefits from stock award exercises		2,079			8,115			7,196			1,378
Stock award exercises and other share issuances, net		39,416			30,309
Distributions to noncontrolling interests		(61,112	)		(46,888	)
Contributions from noncontrolling interests		5,365			11,117			3,959			1,613
Proceeds from sales of additional noncontrolling interests		3,205			7,733			785			108
Purchases from noncontrolling interests		(5,402	)		(6,668	)		(756	)		(2,307	)
Deferred financing costs		(46	)		(42	)

Net cash used in financing activities		(438,713	)		(94,572	)		(38,502	)		(21,834	)

Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents		(4,894	)		170,799
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents								145,893			216,450
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period		539,459			410,881			860,117			539,459

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	534,565		$	581,680		$	1,006,010		$	755,909


	Non-controlling interests subject to put provisions				DaVita Inc. Shareholders’ Equity																														Non-controlling interests not subject to put provisions				Comprehensive income			Non-controlling interests subject to put provisions							DaVita Inc. Shareholders’ Equity																											Non-controlling interests not subject to put provisions			Comprehensive income
				Common stock			Additional paid-in capital				Retained earnings				Treasury stock							Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)				Total
				Shares		Amount								Shares				Amount
Balance at December 31, 2008			$	291,397						134,862						$	135		$	584,358				$		1,889,450				(31,109	)		$	(691,857				)							$	(14,339	)	$	1,767,747		$	59,152
Comprehensive income:
Net income		38,381																422,684															422,684						18,694			479,759
Unrealized losses on interest rate swaps, net of tax																												(2,578	)			(2,578	)							(2,578	)
Less reclassification of net swap realized losses into net income, net of tax																												10,542				10,542								10,542
Unrealized gains on investments, net of tax																												986				986								986
Less reclassification of net investment realized gains into net income, net of tax																												(159	)			(159	)							(159	)

Total comprehensive income																																							$	488,550

Stock purchase shares issued													2,135							107				2,387								4,522
Stock unit shares issued													(1,570	)						69				1,570
Stock options and SSARs exercised													15,598							2,036				48,055								63,653
Stock-based compensation expense													44,422																			44,422
Excess tax benefits from stock awards exercised													6,150																			6,150
Distributions to noncontrolling interests		(44,277	)																																	(23,471	)
Contributions from noncontrolling interests		10,502																																		2,569
Sales and assumptions of additional noncontrolling interests		13,483											(529	)																		(529	)			4,039
Purchases from noncontrolling interests		(2,594	)										(3,721	)																		(3,721	)			(544	)
Changes in fair value of noncontrolling interests		24,819											(24,819	)																		(24,819	)
Other adjustments		14											(339	)																		(339	)			(1,346	)
Purchase of treasury stock																				(2,903	)			(153,495	)							(153,495	)
																																										Non-controlling interests subject to put provisions							Common stock						Additional paid-in capital				Retained earnings		Treasury stock								Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)				Total			Non-controlling interests not subject to put provisions			Comprehensive income
Balance at December 31, 2009	$	331,725				134,862		$	135			$	621,685			$	2,312,134			(31,800	)		$	(793,340	)		$	(5,548	)		$	2,135,066			$	59,093													134,862		$	135		$	621,685			$	2,312,134		(31,800	)		$	(793,340	)		$	(5,548	)		$	2,135,066
Comprehensive income:
Net income		40,461															336,663															336,663				14,650				391,774			52,589																	405,683														405,683			25,947		$	484,219
Unrealized losses on interest rate swaps, net of tax																												(134	)			(134	)							(134	)																													(134	)			(134	)					(134	)
Less reclassification of net swap realized losses into net income, net of tax																												5,557				5,557								5,557																														5,557				5,557						5,557
Unrealized gains on investments, net of tax																												231				231								231																														615				615						615
Less reclassification of net investment realized losses into net income, net of tax																												13				13								13																														13				13						13

Total comprehensive income																																							$	397,441																																							$	490,270

Stock purchase shares issued													2,130							86				2,151								4,281																								2,129						86				2,151								4,280
Stock unit shares issued													(685	)						26				685																																(875	)					32				875								—
Stock options and SSARs exercised													6,461							1,191				30,358								36,819																								455						1,740				48,231								48,686
Stock-based compensation expense													33,492																			33,492																								45,551																		45,551
Excess tax benefits from stock awards exercised													2,079																			2,079																								6,283																		6,283
Distributions to noncontrolling interests		(39,701	)																																	(21,411	)						(54,612	)																																	(28,979	)
Contributions from noncontrolling interests		1,441																																		3,924							5,439																																		4,071
Sales and assumptions of additional noncontrolling interests		2,888											(301	)																		(301	)			1,990							4,059													(298	)																	(298	)		2,308
Purchases from noncontrolling interests		(1,420	)										(779	)																		(779	)			(3,203	)						(4,949	)												(5,537	)																	(5,537	)		(3,728	)
Impact on fair value due to change in methodology		(24,571	)										24,571																			24,571											(24,571	)												24,571																		24,571
Changes in fair value of noncontrolling interests		57,546											(57,546	)																		(57,546	)										73,372													(73,372	)																	(73,372	)
Other adjustments													(45	)																		(45	)																							(46	)																	(46	)
Purchase of treasury stock																				(3,035	)			(198,534	)							(198,534	)																													(8,919	)			(618,496	)							(618,496	)

Balance at September 30, 2010	$	368,369				134,862		$	135			$	631,062			$	2,648,797			(33,532	)		$	(958,680	)		$	119			$	2,321,433			$	55,043
Balance at December 31, 2010																																										$	383,052							134,862		$	135		$	620,546			$	2,717,817		(38,861	)		$	(1,360,579	)		$	503			$	1,978,422		$	58,712
Comprehensive income:
Net income																																											10,595																	94,502														94,502			9,655		$	114,752
Unrealized losses on interest rate swap and cap agreements, net of tax																																																																						(4,134	)			(4,134	)					(4,134	)
Less reclassification of net swap and cap agreements realized losses into net income, net of tax																																																																						1,743				1,743						1,743
Unrealized gains on investments, net of tax																																																																						268				268						268
Less reclassification of net investment realized gains into net income, net of tax																																																																						(57	)			(57	)					(57	)

Total comprehensive income																																																																															$	112,572

Stock purchase shares issued																																																								1,997						84				2,936								4,933
Stock unit shares issued																																																								(570	)					16				570								—
Stock options and SSARs exercised																																																								(13,721	)					456				15,965								2,244
Stock-based compensation expense																																																								9,716																		9,716
Excess tax benefits from stock awards exercised																																																								7,196																		7,196
Distributions to noncontrolling interests																																											(13,985	)																																	(8,202	)
Contributions from noncontrolling interests																																											1,476																																		2,483
Sales and assumptions of additional noncontrolling interests																																											18,635													27																		27
Purchases from noncontrolling interests																																																								(614	)																	(614	)		(142	)
Changes in fair value of noncontrolling interests																																											6,215													(6,215	)																	(6,215	)
Purchase of treasury stock																																																														(162	)			(13,636	)							(13,636	)

Balance at March 31, 2011																																										$	405,988							134,862		$	135		$	618,362			$	2,812,319		(38,467	)		$	(1,354,744	)		$	(1,677	)		$	2,074,395		$	62,506

Unless otherwise indicated in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q “the Company”, “we”, “us”, “our” and similar terms refer to DaVita Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries.

The condensed consolidated interim financial statements included in this report are prepared by the Company without audit. In the opinion of management, all adjustments consisting only of normal recurring items necessary for a fair presentation of the results of operations are reflected in these consolidated interim financial statements. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated. The preparation of these financial statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses. The most significant estimates and assumptions underlying these financial statements and accompanying notes generally involve revenue recognition and provisions for uncollectible accounts, impairments and valuation adjustments, fair value estimates, accounting for income taxes, variable compensation accruals, purchase accounting valuation estimates and stock-based compensation. The results of operations for the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September 30, 2010~~March 31, 2011 are not necessarily indicative of the operating results for the full year. The consolidated interim financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, ~~2009.~~2010. Prior year balances and amounts have been classified to conform to the current year presentation. The Company has evaluated subsequent events through the date these condensed consolidated financial statements were issued and has included all necessary disclosures.

Basic net income per share is calculated by dividing net income attributable to DaVita Inc., net of the decrease (increase) in noncontrolling interest redemption rights in excess of fair value, by the weighted average number of common shares and vested stock units outstanding. Diluted net income per share includes the dilutive effect of outstanding ~~stock options,~~ stock-settled stock appreciation rights, stock options and unvested stock units (under the treasury stock method).

The reconciliations of the numerators and denominators used to calculate basic and diluted earnings per share are as follows:


	Three months ended September 30,				Nine months ended September 30,					Three months ended March 31,
	2010		2009		2010			2009		2011		2010
Basic:
Net income attributable to DaVita Inc.	$	119,387	$	110,930	$	336,663		$	312,960	$	94,502	$	109,423
Decrease (increase) in noncontrolling interest redemption rights in excess of fair value		26		—		(45	)		—		27		(869	)

Net income for basic earnings per share calculation		119,413		110,930		336,618			312,960		94,529		108,554

Weighted average shares outstanding during the period		102,602		104,118		102,982			103,896		96,258		103,356
Vested stock units		7		9		7			9		6		9

Weighted average shares for basic earnings per share calculation		102,609		104,127		102,989			103,905		96,264		103,365

Basic net income per share attributable to DaVita Inc.	$	1.16	$	1.07	$	3.27		$	3.01	$	0.98	$	1.05

Diluted:
Net income for diluted earnings per share calculation	$	119,387	$	110,930	$	336,663		$	312,960	$	94,502	$	109,423
Decrease (increase) in noncontrolling interest redemption rights in excess of fair value		26		—		(45	)		—		27		(869	)

Net income for diluted earnings per share calculation		119,413		110,930		336,618			312,960		94,529		108,554

Weighted average shares outstanding during the period		102,602		104,118		102,982			103,896		96,258		103,356
Vested stock units		7		9		7			9		6		9
Assumed incremental shares from stock plans		1,413		480		1,420			410		2,114		1,401

Weighted average shares for diluted earnings per share calculation		104,022		104,607		104,409			104,315		98,378		104,766

Diluted net income per share attributable to DaVita Inc.	$	1.15	$	1.06	$	3.22		$	3.00	$	0.96	$	1.04

Share-based anti-dilutive awards excluded from calculation⁽¹⁾		1,804		9,696		1,368			13,125		558		651

Stock-based compensation recognized in a period represents the amortization during that period of the estimated grant-date fair value of current and prior stock-based awards over their vesting terms, adjusted for expected forfeitures. Shares issued upon exercise of stock awards are generally issued from shares in treasury. The Company has used the Black-Scholes-Merton valuation model for estimating the grant-date fair value of stock options and stock-settled stock appreciation rights granted in all periods. During the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September 30, 2010,~~March 31, 2011, the Company granted ~~1,932~~911 stock-settled stock appreciation rights with a grant-date fair value of ~~$30,566~~$19,889 and a weighted-average expected life of approximately ~~3.5~~4.2 years, and also granted ~~466~~6 stock units with a grant-date fair value of ~~$29,260~~$459 and a weighted-average expected life of approximately ~~2.5~~2.0 years.

For the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, the Company recognized $9,716 and $10,233, respectively, in stock-based compensation expense for stock-settled stock appreciation rights, stock options, stock units and discounted employee stock plan purchases, which are primarily included in general and

For the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, the Company recognized $33,492 and $33,850, respectively, in stock-based compensation expense for stock options, stock-settled stock appreciation rights, stock units and discounted employee stock plan purchases, which are primarily included in general and administrative expenses. The estimated tax ~~benefit~~benefits recorded for stock-based compensation through ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2011 and 2010 was $3,673 and ~~2009 was $12,690 and $12,820,~~$3,880, respectively. As of ~~September 30, 2010,~~March 31, 2011, there was ~~$93,427~~$86,734 of total estimated unrecognized compensation cost related to nonvested stock-based compensation arrangements under the Company’s equity compensation and stock purchase plans. The Company expects to recognize this cost over a weighted average remaining period of 1.5 years.

During the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2011 and 2010, ~~and 2009,~~ the Company received ~~$36,819~~$2,244 and ~~$27,304,~~$20,119, respectively, in cash proceeds from stock option exercises and ~~$15,755~~$13,868 and ~~$12,434,~~$7,873, respectively, in actual tax benefits upon the exercise of stock awards.

During the ~~third~~first quarter of ~~2010,~~2011, the Company repurchased a total of ~~1,448~~162 shares of its common stock for ~~$98,486~~$13,636 or an average price of ~~$68.02 per share. During the first nine months of 2010, the Company repurchased a total of 3,035 shares of its common stock for $198,534 or an average price of $65.41~~$84.02 per share. As of ~~September 30, 2010, a total~~March 31, 2011, all of ~~$49,865 of~~these share repurchases ~~have~~had not yet been settled in cash. In addition, the Company also repurchased a total of ~~4,244~~969 shares of its common stock from ~~October~~April 1, ~~2010~~2011 through ~~October 22, 2010,~~April 30, 2011 for ~~$301,479~~$84,390 or an average price of ~~$71.03~~$87.08 per ~~share, which completed~~share. As a result of these transactions, the Company’s ~~previous~~remaining board authorization for share ~~repurchases.~~ repurchases as of April 30, 2011 is approximately $583,500.

On March 10, 2011, the Company and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as rights agent, entered into an amendment (the “Amendment”) to the Rights Agreement, dated November ~~3, 2010,~~14, 2002 (the “Rights Plan”). The Amendment accelerates the ~~Company’s Board of Directors authorized an additional $800,000 of share repurchases~~expiration of the ~~Company’s common stock.~~

~~In connection with a proposal to stockholders requesting approval of an increase in the number of shares authorized for issuance~~rights issued under the ~~Company’s equity compensation plan,~~Rights Plan from the ~~Board~~close of ~~Directors has committed~~business on November 14, 2012 to ~~our stockholders that over~~ the ~~three-year period commencing~~close of business on ~~April 1, 2010 it will not grant a number~~March 10, 2011. Accordingly, as of ~~shares subject to stock awards~~the close of business on March 10, 2011, the rights issued under the ~~Company’s equity compensation plan, including stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock units or other stock awards, at an average annual rate greater than 4.02%~~Rights Plan expired and are no longer outstanding.

Long-term debt was comprised of the number of shares of the Company’s common stock that management believes will be outstanding over such three-year period. This 4.02% rate is the average of the 2009 and 2010 three-year average median grant rate plus one standard deviation as published by RiskMetrics Group for the Russell 3000 companies in the GICS 3510 industry segment. Awards that are settled in cash, awards that are granted pursuant to stockholder approved exchange programs, awards sold under our employee stock purchase plan and awards assumed or substituted in business combination transactions will be excluded from our grant rate calculation. For purposes of calculating the number of shares granted, any “full-value” awards (i.e., restricted stock, restricted stock unit, performance share or any other award that does not have an exercise price per share at least equal to the per share fair market value of our common stock on the grant date) will count as equivalent to 3.0 shares. The Company will publicly report its compliance with this three-year average annual grant rate commitment, and the data necessary to independently confirm it, in a public filing shortly after March 31, 2013.following:

~~Long-term debt was comprised of the following:~~ at March 31, 2011 were as follows:

On October 20, 2010, the Company entered into a $3,000,000 new Senior Secured Credit Agreement (the Credit Agreement), consisting of a five year $250,000 revolving line of credit, a five year $1,000,000 Term Loan A and a six year $1,750,000 Term Loan B. The Company also has the right to request an increase to the borrowing capacity to a total aggregate principal amount of not more than $4,000,000 subject to bank participation. The revolving line of credit and the Term Loan A will initially bear interest at LIBOR plus an interest rate margin of 2.75% which is subject to adjustment depending upon the Company’s leverage ratio and can range from 2.25% to 2.75%. The Term Loan A requires annual principal payments of $50,000 in 2011, $50,000 in 2012, $100,000 in 2013, and $150,000 in 2014, with the balance of $650,000 due in 2015. The Term Loan B bears interest at LIBOR (floor of 1.50%) plus 3.00% subject to a ratings based step-down to 2.75%. The Term Loan B requires annual principal payments of $17,500 in each year from 2011 through 2015 with the balance of $1,662,500 due in 2016. The borrowings under the Credit Agreement are guaranteed by substantially all of the Company’s direct and indirect wholly-owned domestic subsidiaries and are secured by substantially all of the Company’s and its guarantors’ assets. The Credit Agreement contains customary affirmative and negative covenants such as various restrictions on investments, acquisitions, the payment of dividends, redemptions and acquisitions of capital stock, capital expenditures and other indebtedness, as well as limitations on the amount of tangible net assets in non-guarantor subsidiaries. However, many of these restrictions will not apply as long as the Company leverage ratio is below 3.50:1.00. In addition, the Credit Agreement requires compliance with financial covenants including an interest coverage ratio and a leverage ratio that determines the interest rate margins as described above.

~~On October 20, 2010, the Company also issued $775,000 aggregate principal amount of 6~~³/8~~% senior notes due 2018 and $775,000 aggregate principal amount of 6~~⁵/8% senior notes due 2020 (collectively the New Senior Notes). The New Senior Notes will pay interest on May 1 and November 1 of each year, beginning May 1, 2011. The New Senior Notes are unsecured senior obligations and rank equally to other unsecured senior indebtedness. The New Senior Notes are guaranteed by substantially all of the Company’s direct and indirect wholly owned domestic subsidiaries. The Company may redeem some or all of the 6³/8~~% senior notes at any time on or after November 1, 2013 at certain redemption prices and may redeem some or all of the 6~~⁵/8~~% senior notes at any time on or after November 1, 2014 at certain redemption prices.~~

The Company received total proceeds of $4,300,000 from these transactions, $2,750,000 from the borrowings on Term Loan A and Term Loan B and an additional $1,550,000 from the issuance of the Senior Notes. The Company used a portion of the proceeds to pay-off the outstanding principal balances of its existing Senior Secured Credit Facilities plus accrued interest totaling $1,795,363 and to purchase pursuant to a cash tender offer $557,644 of the outstanding principal balances of the Company’s $700,000 6⁵/8~~% senior notes due 2013 and $730,827 of the outstanding balances of the Company’s $850,000 7~~¹/4~~% senior subordinated notes due 2015, (the Existing Notes), plus accrued interest totaling $1,297,215. The total amount paid for the Existing Notes was $1,019.06 per $1,000 principal amount of the 6~~⁵/8~~% senior notes and $1,038.75 per $1,000 principal amount of the 7~~¹/4% senior subordinated notes. This resulted in the Company paying a cash tender premium of $38,933 in order to extinguish this portion of the Existing Notes. On November 19, 2010, the Company will redeem the remaining outstanding balance of the existing 6⁵/8~~% Senior Notes of $142,356 at 101.656% per $1,000 and the remaining outstanding balance of the existing 7~~¹/4% Senior Subordinated Notes of $119,173 at 103.625% per $1,000 plus accrued interest totaling $264,742. In addition, the Company will pay a call premium totaling $6,677. The Company also paid an additional $70,000 in fees, discounts and other expenses. As a result of the above transactions, the Company received approximately $827,000 in excess cash which it intends to use for general purposes and other opportunities, including share repurchases, potential acquisitions and other growth investments.

In connection with these transactions, the Company is expected to expense one time refinancing charges ranging from $65,000 to $75,000 in the fourth quarter of 2010, which includes the write off of existing deferred financing costs, the cash tender and call premiums, as described above and other expenses.

~~On June 7, 2010, the Company redeemed $200,000 aggregate principal amount of its outstanding 6~~⁵/8% senior notes due 2013, at a price of 101.656% plus accrued interest. As a result of this transaction, the Company incurred pre-tax debt redemption charges of $4,127, which includes the call premium and the net write-off of other finance costs.

During the first ~~nine~~three months of ~~2010,~~2011, the Company made mandatory principal payments totaling ~~$65,625~~$12,500 on the ~~prior~~ Term Loan A.A and $4,375 on the Term Loan B.

~~On September 30, 2010,~~In January 2011, the ~~Company’s interest rate swap agreements expired. The~~ Company ~~had~~ entered into several interest rate swap agreements as a means of hedging its exposure to and volatility from variable-based interest rate changes as part of its overall risk management strategy. These agreements ~~were~~are not held for trading or speculative purposes, and ~~had~~have the economic effect of converting ~~portions~~the LIBOR variable component of the Company’s ~~variable~~interest rate ~~debt~~ to a fixed rate. These swap agreements ~~were~~are designated as cash flow hedges, and as a result, hedge-effective gains or losses resulting from changes in the fair values of these swaps ~~were~~are reported in other comprehensive income until such time as each specific swap tranche ~~was~~is realized, at which time the amounts ~~were~~are reclassified into net income. Net amounts paid or received for each specific swap tranche that have settled ~~were~~have been reflected as adjustments to debt expense. In addition, in January 2011, the Company entered into several interest rate cap agreements that have the economic effect of capping the Company’s maximum exposure to LIBOR variable interest rate changes on specific portions of the Company’s Term Loan B debt, as described below. These cap agreements ~~did~~are also designated as cash flow hedges and as a result changes in the fair values of these cap agreements are reported in other comprehensive income. The amortization of the original cap premium is recognized as a component of debt expense on a straight line basis over the term on the cap agreements. The swap and cap agreements do not contain credit-risk contingent features.

~~The~~As of March 31, 2011, the Company maintained a total of nine interest rate swap agreements ~~that were effective during the third quarter of 2010~~with amortizing notional amounts totaling $987,500. These agreements had the economic effect of modifying the ~~LIBOR-based~~LIBOR variable component of the Company’s interest rate on an equivalent amount of the Company’s ~~debt~~Term Loan A to fixed rates ranging from ~~4.05%~~1.59% to ~~4.70%~~1.64%, resulting in an overall weighted average effective interest rate of ~~5.87% on the hedged portion of the Company’s Senior Secured Credit Facilities,~~4.36%, including the Term Loan BA margin of ~~1.50%~~2.75%. The swap agreements expire by September 30, 2014 and require monthly interest payments. The Company estimates that approximately $11,800 of existing unrealized pre-tax losses in other comprehensive income at March 31, 2011 will be reclassified into income over the next twelve months.

As of March 31, 2011, the Company maintained five interest rate cap agreements with notional amounts totaling $1,250,000. These agreements have the economic effect of capping the LIBOR variable component of the Company’s interest rate at a maximum of 4.00% on an equivalent amount of the Company’s Term Loan B debt. The cap agreements expire on September 30, 2014.

The following table summarizes ~~our~~the Company’s derivative instruments as of ~~September 30, 2010~~March 31, 2011 and December 31, ~~2009:~~2010:

Interest rate swap liabilities

September 30, 2010

December 31, 2009

March 31, 2011

December 31, 2010

Derivatives designated as hedging instruments

Balance sheet
location

Fair value

Balance sheet
location

Fair value

Balance sheet location

Fair value

Balance sheet location

Fair value

Interest rate swap agreements

Other current
liabilities

—

Other current
liabilities

10,792

Other long-term liabilities

947

Other long-term liabilities

—

Interest rate cap agreements

Other long-term assets

9,595

Other long-term assets

—

The following table summarizes the effects of ~~our~~the Company’s interest rate swap and cap agreements for the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September 30, 2010~~March 31, 2011 and ~~2009:~~2010:


	Amount of gains (losses) recognized in OCI on interest rate swap agreements												Location of (losses) gains reclassified from accumulated OCI into income			Amount of gains (losses) reclassified from accumulated OCI into income																Amount of gains (losses) recognized in OCI on interest rate swap agreements								Location of (losses) gains reclassified from accumulated OCI into income				Amount of gains (losses) reclassified from accumulated OCI into income
	Three months ended September 30,						Nine months ended September 30,								Three months ended September 30,								Nine months ended September 30,								Three months ended March 31,												Three months ended March 31,
Derivatives designated as cash flow hedges	2010			2009			2010			2009					2010				2009				2010				2009				2011				2010								2011				2010
Interest rate swap agreements	$	(3	)	$	(1,722	)	$	(217	)	$	(3,681	)		Debt expense			$	(1,942	)		$	(4,450	)		$	(9,093	)		$	(13,280	)		$	(3,200	)		$	(283	)			Debt expense			$	(2,254	)		$	(3,579	)
Tax expense benefit		1			670			83			1,433							756				1,731				3,536				5,166
Interest rate cap agreements																																	(3,564	)			—				Debt expense				(598	)			—
Tax benefit																																	2,630				110								1,109				1,392

Total	$	(2	)	$	(1,052	)	$	(134	)	$	(2,248	)				$	(1,186	)		$	(2,719	)		$	(5,557	)		$	(8,114	)		$	(4,134	)		$	(173	)						$	(1,743	)		$	(2,187	)

Total comprehensive income for the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2011 was $112,572, including a decrease to other comprehensive income due to unrealized valuation losses on interest rate swaps and caps of $2,391, net of tax, net of amounts reclassified into income, and an increase to other comprehensive income for unrealized valuation gains on investments, and the amounts reclassified into income of $211, net of tax.

Total comprehensive income for the three months ended March 31, 2010 was ~~$144,461 and $397,441, respectively,~~$127,228 including an increase to other comprehensive income for amounts reclassified into income, net of unrealized valuation loss on interest rate swaps of ~~$1,184 and $5,423~~$2,014, net of tax, ~~respectively,~~ and an increase to other comprehensive income for unrealized valuation gains on investments, and the amounts reclassified into income of ~~$396 and $244,~~$214, net of ~~tax, respectively.~~

Total comprehensive income for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009 was $128,465 and $360,677, respectively, including an increase to comprehensive income for amounts reclassified into income, net of unrealized valuation losses on interest rate swaps of $1,667 and $5,866, net of tax, respectively, and an increase to other comprehensive income for unrealized valuation gains on investments, net of amounts reclassified into income of $527 and $635, net of tax, respectively.tax.

As of ~~September 30, 2010,~~March 31, 2011, the Company’s interest rates were economically fixed on ~~approximately 46%~~primarily all of its total debt.

~~The~~As a result of the swap agreements, the Company’s overall weighted average effective interest rate on the Senior Secured Credit Facilities was ~~1.80%~~4.67%, based upon the current margins in effect of ~~1.50%,~~2.75% for the Term loan A and 3.00% for the Term Loan B, as of ~~September 30, 2010.~~March 31, 2011.

The Company’s overall weighted average effective interest rate during the ~~third~~first quarter of ~~2010~~2011 was ~~4.45%~~5.20% and as of ~~September 30, 2010~~March 31, 2011 was ~~4.18%~~5.34%.

As of ~~September 30, 2010,~~March 31, 2011, the Company had undrawn revolving credit facilities totaling $250,000 of which approximately ~~$52,000~~$45,789 was committed for outstanding letters of credit.

The majority of the Company’s revenues are from government programs and may be subject to adjustment as a result of: (1) examination by government agencies or contractors, for which the resolution of any matters raised may take extended periods of time to finalize; (2) differing interpretations of government regulations by different ~~fiscal intermediaries~~Medicare contractors or regulatory authorities; (3) differing opinions regarding a patient’s medical diagnosis or the medical necessity of services provided; and (4) retroactive applications or interpretations of governmental requirements. In addition, the Company’s revenues from commercial payors may be subject to adjustment as a result of potential claims for refunds, as a result of government actions or as a result of other claims by commercial payors.

Eastern District of Missouri Matter:In March 2005, the Company received a subpoena from the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Eastern District of Missouri in St. Louis. The subpoena ~~requires~~required production of a wide range of documents relating to the Company’s operations, including documents related to, among other things, pharmaceutical and other services provided to patients, relationships with pharmaceutical companies, and financial relationships with physicians and joint ventures. The subpoena covers the period from December 1, 1996 through ~~the present.~~March 2005. In October 2005, the Company received a follow-up request for additional documents related to specific medical director and joint venture arrangements. In February 2006, the Company received an additional subpoena for documents, including certain patient records relating to the administration and billing of Epogen^®, or EPO. In May 2007, the Company received a request for documents related to durable medical equipment and supply companies owned and operated by the Company. The Company ~~is cooperating~~cooperated with the inquiry and ~~is producing~~has produced the requested records. The subpoenas ~~have been~~were issued in connection with a joint civil and criminal investigation. It is possible that criminal proceedings may be initiated against the Company in connection with this inquiry. The Company has not received a communication from the St. Louis U.S. Attorney’s Office on this matter in over 2 years.

Eastern District of Texas Matter:In February 2007, the Company received a request for information from the Office of Inspector General, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, or OIG, for records relating to EPO claims submitted to Medicare. In August 2007, the Company received a subpoena from the OIG seeking similar documents. The requested documents relate to services provided from 2001 to 2004 by a number of the Company’s centers. The request and subpoena were sent from the OIG’s offices in Houston and Dallas, Texas. The Company has cooperated with the inquiry and has produced all previously requested records to date. The Company ~~has been in contact with~~was contacted by the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Eastern District of Texas, which ~~has~~ stated that this is a civil inquiry related to EPO claims. On July 6, 2009, the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas lifted the seal on the civilqui tam complaint related to these allegations and the Company was subsequently served with a complaint by the relator. The government did not intervene and is not actively pursuing this matter. The relator is pursuing the claims independently and the parties are engaged in active litigation. The Company believes that there is some overlap between this issue and the ongoing review of EPO utilization ~~and claims by the U.S. Attorney’s Office for~~in the Eastern District of Missouri ~~in St. Louis~~matter described above.

Northern District of Georgia Matter:In December 2008, the Company received a subpoena for documents from the OIG relating to the pharmaceutical products Zemplar, Hectorol, Venofer, Ferrlecit and ~~Epogen~~^®~~, or~~ EPO, as well as other related matters. The subpoena covers the period from January 2003 to the present. The Company has been in contact with the ~~United States Attorney’s Office, or~~ U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Northern District of Georgia and the U.S. Department of Justice in Washington, DC, since November 2008 relating to this matter, and ~~has been~~was advised that this is a civil

inquiry. On June 17, 2009, the Company learned that the allegations underlying this inquiry were made as part of a civil qui tam complaint filed by individuals and brought pursuant to the federal False Claims Act. ~~The case remains under seal in~~On April 1, 2011, the United States District Court for the Northern District of ~~Georgia. The Company~~Georgia ordered the case to be unsealed. At that time, the Department of Justice and U.S. Attorney’s Office filed a notice of declination stating that the United States would not be intervening and not pursuing the relator’s allegation in litigation. It is ~~cooperating with~~possible that the ~~inquiry and is producing~~relators will independently pursue the ~~requested records.~~

Dallas Matter:In May 2010, the Company received a subpoena from the OIG’s office in Dallas, Texas. The subpoena covers the period from January 1, 2005, ~~through~~to the present, and seeks production of a wide range of documents relating to the Company’s operations, including documents related to, among other things, financial relationships with physicians and joint ventures. The subject matter of this subpoena overlaps with the subject matter ~~of the investigation being conducted by the United States Attorney’s Office for~~in the Eastern District of Missouri ~~in St. Louis as~~Matter described above. The Company met with representatives of the government to discuss the scope of the subpoena and the production of responsive documents. The Company has been advised that this is a civil investigation. The Company is cooperating with the inquiry and is producing the requested records. ~~It is possible that criminal proceedings may be initiated against the Company in connection with this inquiry.~~

To the Company’s knowledge, no proceedings have been initiated against the Company at this time in connection with any of the inquiries by the federal government as set forth above. Although the Company cannot predict whether or when proceedings might be initiated or when these matters may be resolved, it is not unusual for investigations such as these to continue for a considerable period of time. Responding to the subpoenas will continue to require management’s attention and significant legal expense. Any negative findings could result in substantial financial penalties against the Company, exclusion from future participation in the Medicare and Medicaid programs and, to the extent criminal proceedings may be initiated against the Company as indicated above, possible criminal penalties. At this time, the Company cannot predict the ultimate outcome of these inquiries or the potential range of damages, if any.

The Company has received several notices of claims from commercial payors and other third parties related to historical billing practices and claims against DVA Renal Healthcare (formerly known as Gambro Healthcare), a subsidiary of the Company, related to historical Gambro Healthcare billing practices and other matters covered by its 2004 settlement agreement with the Department of Justice and certain agencies of the U.S. government. At least one commercial payor has filed an arbitration demand against the Company, as described below, and additional commercial payors have threatened litigation. The Company intends to defend against these claims vigorously; however, the Company may not be successful and these claims may lead to litigation and any such litigation may be resolved unfavorably. At this time, the Company cannot predict the ultimate outcome of this matter or the potential range of damages, if any.

~~Several~~A wage and hour ~~claims have~~claim, which has been ~~filed~~styled as a class action, is pending against the Company in the Superior Court of ~~California, each of which has been styled as a class action. In February 2007, June 2008, October 2008 and December 2008, the~~California. The Company was served with ~~five separate complaints~~the complaint in ~~California, including two~~this lawsuit in ~~October~~April 2008, ~~by various former employees, each of which~~and it has been amended since that time. The lawsuit, as amended, alleges ~~among other things,~~ that the Company failed to provide ~~rest and~~ meal periods, failed to pay compensation in lieu of providing ~~such~~ rest or meal periods, failed to pay ~~the correct amount of~~ overtime, ~~failed to pay the rate on the “wage statement,”~~ and failed to comply with certain other California Labor Code requirements. The Company has reached a settlement and release of all claims against it in connection with the complaints served in February 2007 and December 2008 and one of the complaints served in October 2008. The Company has funded the settlement during the first quarter of 2010, which pursuant to the terms of the settlement agreement will result in a dismissal of the underlying court proceedings against it. The overall settlement amount was not material. The Company has reached an agreement with plaintiffs to settle the claims in the second complaint filed in October 2008. That settlement must be approved by the Court. If it is approved, the amount of the overall settlement will not be material. The Company intends to vigorously defend against ~~the remaining~~these claims and to vigorously oppose the certification of ~~the remaining matters~~these claims as a class ~~actions.~~action. Any potential ~~settlements~~settlement of these ~~remaining~~ claims ~~are~~is not anticipated to be ~~material.~~material to the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements.

In October 2007, the Company was contacted by the Attorney General’s Office for the State of Nevada. The Attorney General’s Office informed the Company that it was conducting a civil and criminal investigation of the Company’s operations in Nevada and that the investigation related to the billing of pharmaceuticals, including EPO. In February 2008, the Attorney General’s Office informed the Company that the civil and criminal investigation had been discontinued. The Attorney General’s Office further advised the Company that Nevada Medicaid intended to conduct audits of end stage renal disease (ESRD) dialysis providers in Nevada ~~including the Company,~~ and such audits would relate to the issues that were the subjects of the investigation. To the Company’s knowledge, no court proceedings have been initiated against the Company at this time. Any negative audit findings could result in a substantial repayment by the Company. At this time, the Company cannot predict the ultimate outcome of this matter or the potential range of damages, if any.

In August 2005, Blue Cross/Blue Shield of Louisiana filed a complaint in the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana against Gambro AB, the Company’s subsidiary, DVA Renal Healthcare (formerly known as Gambro Healthcare) and related entities. The plaintiff sought to bring its claims as a class action on behalf of itself and all entities that paid any of the defendants for health care goods and services from on or about January 1991 through at least December 2004. The complaint alleged, among other things, damages resulting from facts and circumstances underlying Gambro Healthcare’s 2004 settlement agreement with the Department of Justice and certain agencies of the U.S. government. In March 2006, the case was dismissed and the plaintiff was compelled to seek arbitration to resolve the matter. In November 2006, the plaintiff filed a demand for class arbitration against the Company and DVA Renal ~~Healthcare,~~Healthcare. In February 2011, the arbitration panel denied plaintiff’s request to certify a ~~subsidiary of the Company.~~class. The Company intends to vigorously defend against ~~these claims. The Company also intends to vigorously oppose the certification of this matter as a class action.~~plaintiff’s remaining individual claims and any appeal that may be filed. At this time, the Company cannot predict the ultimate outcome of this matter or the potential range of damages, if any.

In June 2004, ~~Gambro Healthcare (now known as~~ DVA Renal Healthcare ~~and a subsidiary of the Company)~~ was served with a complaint filed in the Superior Court of California by one of its former employees who worked for its California acute services program. The complaint, which is styled as a class action, alleges, among other things, that DVA Renal Healthcare failed to provide overtime wages, defined rest periods and meal periods, or compensation in lieu of such provisions and failed to comply with certain other California Labor Code requirements. The Company intends to vigorously defend against these claims. The Company also intends to vigorously oppose the certification of this matter as a class action. At this time, any potential settlement of these claims is not anticipated to be material to the ~~Company cannot predict the ultimate outcome of this matter or the potential range of damages, if any.~~Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In addition to the foregoing, the Company is subject to claims and suits, including from time to time, contractual disputes and professional and general liability claims, as well as audits and investigations by various government entities, in the ordinary course of business. The Company believes that the ultimate resolution of any such pending proceedings, whether the underlying claims are covered by insurance or not, will not have a material adverse effect on its financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

Based on the Company’s intentions and strategy involving investments in debt and equity securities, the Company classifies certain debt securities as held-to-maturity and records them at amortized cost. Equity securities that have readily determinable fair values and certain other debt securities classified as available for sale are recorded at fair value.


	September 30, 2010						December 31, 2009						March 31, 2011						December 31, 2010
	Held to maturity		Available for sale		Total		Held to maturity		Available for sale		Total		Held to maturity		Available for sale		Total		Held to maturity		Available for sale		Total
Certificates of deposit, money market funds and U.S. treasury notes due within one year	$	21,745	$	—	$	21,745	$	25,275	$	—	$	25,275	$	21,806	$	—	$	21,806	$	21,803	$	—	$	21,803
Investments in mutual funds		—		9,249		9,249		—		8,816		8,816		—		9,634		9,634		—		10,048		10,048

	$	21,745	$	9,249	$	30,994	$	25,275	$	8,816	$	34,091	$	21,806	$	9,634	$	31,440	$	21,803	$	10,048	$	31,851

Short-term investments	$	21,745	$	1,200	$	22,945	$	25,275	$	1,200	$	26,475	$	21,806	$	1,200	$	23,006	$	21,803	$	1,200	$	23,003
Long-term investments		—		8,049		8,049		—		7,616		7,616		—		8,434		8,434		—		8,848		8,848

	$	21,745	$	9,249	$	30,994	$	25,275	$	8,816	$	34,091	$	21,806	$	9,634	$	31,440	$	21,803	$	10,048	$	31,851

The cost of the certificates of deposit, money market funds and U.S. treasury notes at ~~September 30, 2010~~March 31, 2011 and December 31, ~~2009~~2010 approximates their fair value. As of ~~September 30, 2010~~March 31, 2011 and December 31, ~~2009,~~2010, the available for sale investments included ~~$195~~$1,168 and ~~($205),~~$824, of gross pre-tax unrealized gains, ~~and (losses),~~ respectively. During the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September 30, 2010,~~March 31, 2011, the Company recorded gross pre-tax unrealized gains of ~~$378,~~$437, or ~~$231~~$268 after tax, in other comprehensive income associated with changes in the fair value of these investments. During the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September 30, 2010,~~March 31, 2011, the Company sold equity securities in mutual funds for net proceeds of ~~$900,~~$1,149, and recognized a pre-tax ~~loss~~gain of ~~$22,~~$93, or ~~$13~~$57 after tax, that was previously recorded in other comprehensive income. During the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September 30, 2009,~~March 31, 2010, the Company sold ~~equity securities~~investments in mutual funds for net proceeds of ~~$16,537,~~$880, and recognized a pre-tax ~~gain~~loss of ~~$255,~~$22, or ~~$156~~$14 after tax, that was previously recorded in other comprehensive income. ~~These pre-tax amounts are included in other income.~~

As of ~~September 30, 2010,~~March 31, 2011, investments totaling ~~$18,498~~$18,538 classified as held to maturity are investments used to maintain certain capital requirements of the special need plans of VillageHealth, which is a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company. As of December 31, 2009, the Company discontinued the VillageHealth special needs plans and is in ~~the~~ process of paying out all incurred claims. The Company also expects to liquidate ~~these~~its investments that are currently held to maintain certain capital requirements as soon as ~~all of the claims are paid and~~ the various state regulatory agencies approve the release of these investments. The investments in mutual funds classified as available for sale are held inwithin a trust to fund existing obligations associated with several of the Company’s non-qualified deferred compensation plans.

On July 22, 2010, the Company entered into a First Amended and Restated National Service Provider Agreement, or the Agreement, with NxStage Medical Inc., or NxStage. The Agreement supersedes the National Service Provider Agreement that the Company entered into with NxStage on February 7, 2007. Under terms of the Agreement, the Company will have the ability to continue to purchase NxStage System One hemodialysis machines and related supplies at discounted prices. In addition, under the Agreement, the Company may earn warrants to purchase NxStage common stock subject to certain requirements, including the Company’s ability to achieve certain System One home patient growth targets. The Agreement provides for a range of warrant amounts that may be earned annually depending upon the achievement of various home patient targets. The maximum amount of shares underlying warrants that the Company can earn over three years is 5,500. The exercise price of the warrants is $14.22 per share. In connection therewith, the Company entered into a Registration Rights Agreement whereby NxStage has agreed to register any shares issued to the Company under the warrants. The Agreement expires on June 30, 2013, and will be automatically extended on a monthly basis unless terminated by either party pursuant to the Agreement.

Effective December 15, 2009, FASB amended certain fair value disclosure requirements to include additional disclosures related to significant transfers in and out of the various fair value hierarchy levels and to clarify existing disclosures by providing disaggregate levels for each class of assets and liabilities. The Company is also required to provide additional disclosures on the valuation techniques and inputs used to measure fair value, as well as changes to the valuation techniques and inputs, for both recurring and nonrecurring assets and liabilities carried at fair value. In addition, the Company is also required to disclose the reason for making changes to its valuation techniques, assumptions and or other unobservable market inputs. Certain other disclosures on reporting the gross activity rather than the net activity for Level 3 fair value measurements is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 31, 2010. See Note 8 to the condensed consolidated financial statements for further discussion.

The Company measures the fair value of certain assets, liabilities and noncontrolling interests subject to put provisions (temporary equity) based upon certain valuation techniques that include observable or unobservable inputs and assumptions that market participants would use in pricing these assets, liabilities and commitments. The Company also has classified certain assets, liabilities and noncontrolling interests subject to put provisions that are measured at fair value into the appropriate fair value hierarchy levels.

The following table summarizes the Company’s assets, liabilities and temporary equity measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of ~~September 30, 2010:~~March 31, 2011:


	Total		Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets (Level 1)		Significant other observable inputs (Level 2)		Significant unobservable inputs (Level 3)		Total		Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets (Level 1)		Significant other observable inputs (Level 2)		Significant unobservable inputs (Level 3)
Assets
Available for sale securities	$	9,249	$	9,249	$	—	$	—	$	9,634	$	9,634	$	—	$	—

Interest rate cap agreements									$	9,595	$	—	$	9,595	$	—

Liabilities
Interest rate swap agreements									$	947	$	—	$	947	$	—

Temporary equity
Noncontrolling interests subject to put provisions	$	368,369	$	—	$	—	$	368,369	$	405,988	$	—	$	—	$	405,988

The available for sale securities represent investments in various open-ended registered investment companies, or mutual funds, and are recorded at fair value based upon the quoted market prices as reported by each mutual fund. See Note 6 to the condensed consolidated financial statements for further discussion.

The interest rate swap and cap agreements are recorded at fair value based upon valuation models and a variety of techniques as reported by various broker dealers that are based upon relevant observable market inputs such as current interest rates, forward yield curves, and other credit and liquidity market conditions. The Company does not believe the ultimate amount that could be realized upon settlement of these interest rate swap and cap agreements would be materially different than the fair values as currently reported. See Note 4 to the condensed consolidated financial statements for further discussion.

See Note 8 to the condensed consolidated financial statements for a discussion of the Company’s methodology for estimating the fair value of noncontrolling interests subject to put obligations.

The Company has other financial instruments in addition to the above that consist primarily of cash, accounts ~~receivable, notes~~ receivable, accounts payable, other accrued liabilities, and debt. The balances of the non-debt financial instruments are presented in the condensed consolidated financial statements at ~~September 30, 2010~~March 31, 2011 at their approximate fair values due to the short-term nature of their settlements. ~~Borrowings under~~The carrying amount of the Company’s Senior Secured Credit Facilities totaled ~~$1,793,375~~$2,725,113 as of ~~September 30, 2010~~March 31, 2011 and the fair value was ~~$1,784,408~~$2,737,776 based upon quoted market prices. The fair value of the Company’s senior ~~and senior subordinated~~ notes was approximately ~~$1,590,000~~$1,565,423 at ~~September 30, 2010,~~March 31, 2011, based upon quoted market prices, as compared to the carrying amount of ~~$1,551,608, which includes the premium on the 6~~⁵/8~~% senior notes.~~

The Company has potential obligations to purchase the noncontrolling interests held by third parties in several of its joint ventures and non-wholly-owned subsidiaries. These obligations are in the form of put provisions and are exercisable at the third-party owners’ discretion within specified periods as outlined in each specific put provision. If these put provisions were exercised, the Company would be required to purchase the third-party owners’ noncontrolling interests at either the appraised fair market value or a predetermined multiple of earnings or cash flow attributable to the noncontrolling interests put to the Company, which is intended to

approximate fair value. The methodology the Company uses to estimate the fair values of noncontrolling interests subject to put provisions assumes either the higher of a liquidation value of net assets or an average multiple of earnings, based on historical earnings, patient mix and other performance indicators, as well as other factors. During the second quarter of 2010, the Company refined its methodology used to estimate the fair value of noncontrolling interests subject to put provisions by eliminating an annual inflation factor that was previously applied to the put provisions until they became exercisable. The Company believes that eliminating an annual inflation factor will result in a better representation of the estimated actual fair value of the noncontrolling interests subject to put provisions as of the reporting date. The estimated fair values of the noncontrolling interests subject to put provisions can fluctuate and the implicit multiple of earnings at which these noncontrolling interests obligations may be settled will vary significantly depending upon market conditions including potential purchasers’ access to the capital markets, which can impact the level of competition for dialysis and non-dialysis related businesses, the economic performance of these businesses and the restricted marketability of the third-party owners’ noncontrolling interests. The amount of noncontrolling interests subject to put provisions that contractually employ a predetermined multiple of earnings rather than fair value are immaterial.

Additionally, the Company has certain other potential commitments to provide operating capital to several dialysis centers that are wholly-owned by third parties or centers in which the Company owns ana minority equity investment as well as to physician-owned vascular access clinics that the Company operates under management and administrative services agreements of approximately ~~$4,200.~~$2,100.

Certain consolidated joint ventures are contractually scheduled to dissolve after terms ranging from ten to fifty years. Accordingly, the noncontrolling interests in these joint ventures are considered mandatorily redeemable instruments for which the classification and measurement requirements have been indefinitely deferred. Future distributions upon dissolution of these entities would be valued below the related noncontrolling interest carrying balances in the condensed consolidated balance sheet.

In July 2010, the Company announced that it will construct a new corporate headquarters in Denver, Colorado. In July 2010, the Company acquired the land and existing improvements for approximately $11,000 and estimates that the total construction costs of the building will be approximately $90,000. Construction is expected to begin in early 2011, and is estimated to be complete in the second half of 2012.

As of ~~September 30, 2010,~~March 31, 2011, the Company’s total liability for unrecognized tax benefits relating to tax positions that do not meet the more-likely-than-not threshold is ~~$18,661,~~$8,514, all of which ~~$11,336~~ would impact the Company’s effective tax rate if recognized. ~~The~~This balance represents ~~a decrease~~an increase of ~~$12,032~~$376 from ~~the~~ December 31, ~~2009~~2010 balance ~~primarily~~of $8,138 due to ~~a tax accounting method change initiated during~~ the ~~quarter ending March 31, 2010~~addition of 2011 liabilities.

The Company recognizes accrued interest and ~~reductions due~~penalties related to ~~statute lapses. The decrease associated with the tax accounting method change did not impact the Company’s effective tax rate. It is reasonably possible that $7,325 of~~ unrecognized tax benefits ~~may be recognized within~~in its income tax expense. At March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the ~~next 12 months~~Company had approximately $3,602 and ~~will not impact~~$3,177, respectively, accrued for interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits, net of federal tax benefits.

On February 4, 2011, the ~~Company’s effective tax rate.~~Company entered into a definitive agreement to acquire all of the outstanding equity securities of CDSI I Holding Company, Inc., parent company of dialysis provider DSI Renal, Inc. (DSI), in cash for approximately $689,200, subject to among other things, adjustments for certain items such as working capital, the purchase of noncontrolling interests, capital assets and acquisitions expenditures. DSI currently operates approximately 106 outpatient dialysis centers serving approximately 8,000 patients. The transaction is subject to approval by the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) including Hart-Scott-Rodino antitrust clearance.

The Company anticipates that it will be required by the FTC to divest a certain number of outpatient dialysis centers as a condition of the transaction. The Company currently expects the transaction to close in the third quarter of 2011.

During the first quarter of 2011, the Company acquired 17 dialysis centers for an aggregate purchase cost of $81,523.

The ~~Company recognizes accrued interest~~initial purchase cost allocations for acquired businesses are recorded at fair values based upon the best information available to management and ~~penalties~~are finalized when identified pre-acquisition contingencies have been resolved and other information arranged to be obtained has been received, but in no case in excess of one year from the acquisition date.

The aggregate purchase cost allocations for dialysis businesses were as follows:

Amortizable intangible assets acquired during the first quarter of 2011 had weighted average estimated useful lives of nine years. For the first quarter of 2011, all of the goodwill was associated with the dialysis and related ~~to unrecognized~~lab services business. The total amount of goodwill deductible for tax ~~benefits in its income tax expense. At September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, the Company had~~purposes associated with these acquisitions was approximately ~~$3,636 and $3,226, respectively, accrued for interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits, net of federal tax benefits.~~$75,000.

The Company operates principally as a dialysis and related lab services business but also operates other ancillary services and strategic initiatives. These ancillary services and strategic initiatives consist of pharmacy services, infusion therapy services, disease management services, vascular access services, ESRD clinical research programs and physician services. For internal management reporting, the dialysis and related lab services business and each of the ancillary services and strategic initiatives have been defined as separate operating segments by management as separate financial information is regularly produced and reviewed by the Company’s chief operating decision maker in making decisions about allocating resources and assessing financial results. The Company’s chief operating decision maker is its Chief Executive Officer. The dialysis and related lab services business qualifies as a separately reportable segment and all of the other ancillary services and strategic initiatives operating segments have been combined and disclosed in the other segments category.

The Company’s operating segment financial information is prepared on an internal management reporting basis that the Chief Executive Officer uses to allocate resources and analyze the performance of operating segments. For internal management reporting, segment operations include direct segment operating expenses with the exception of stock-based compensation expense and equity investment income. In addition, beginning in 2011, the ancillary services and strategic initiatives segment operations also include an allocation of corporate general and administrative expenses.

The following is a summary of segment revenues, segment operating ~~income~~margin (loss), and a reconciliation of segment operating ~~income~~margin to consolidated income before income taxes:


	Three months ended September 30,						Nine months ended September 30,						Three months ended March 31,
	2010			2009			2010			2009			2011			2010
Segment revenues:
Dialysis and related lab services⁽¹⁾	$	1,553,374		$	1,491,271		$	4,528,039		$	4,309,009
External sources													$	1,502,539		$	1,475,932
Intersegment revenues														2,206			2,513

Total dialysis and related lab services														1,504,745			1,478,445

Other – Ancillary services and strategic initiatives		98,275			82,644			269,935			231,587
External sources⁽²⁾													$	103,419		$	83,486
Intersegment revenues														2,297			—

Total ancillary services and strategic initiatives														105,716			83,486

Total segment revenues														1,610,461			1,561,931
Elimination of intersegment revenues														(4,503	)		(2,513	)

Consolidated revenues	$	1,651,649		$	1,573,915		$	4,797,974		$	4,540,596		$	1,605,958		$	1,559,418

Segment operating income (loss):
Segment operating margin (loss):⁽³⁾
Dialysis and related lab services	$	265,613		$	258,554		$	771,403		$	741,971		$	250,167		$	252,119
Other – Ancillary services and strategic initiatives		282			(2,824	)		(3,257	)		(7,628	)		(6,417	)		(1,565	)

Total segment operating income		265,895			255,730			768,146			734,343
Reconciliation of segment operating income to consolidated income before income taxes:
Total segment margin														243,750			250,554
Reconciliation of segment operating margin to consolidated income before income taxes:
Stock-based compensation		(11,093	)		(11,437	)		(33,492	)		(33,850	)		(9,716	)		(10,233	)
Equity investment income		1,789			708			6,968			1,066			1,519			2,345

Consolidated operating income		256,591			245,001			741,622			701,559			235,553			242,666
Debt expense		(39,490	)		(45,535	)		(127,728	)		(140,924	)		(58,595	)		(44,583	)
Debt redemption charges		—			—			(4,127	)		—
Other income		759			999			2,329			3,026			841			831

Consolidated income before income taxes	$	217,860		$	200,465		$	612,096		$	563,661		$	177,799		$	198,914

Depreciation and amortization expense for the dialysis and related lab services for the three months ended March 31, 2011 was $60,348, and was $1,689 for the ancillary services and strategic initiatives.

Depreciation and amortization expense for the dialysis and related lab services for the three months ended March 31, 2010 was $55,817, and was $1,651 for the ancillary services and strategic initiatives.

Depreciation and amortization expense for the dialysis and related lab services for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010 were $56,859 and $169,391, respectively, and were $1,627 and $4,916, respectively, for the ancillary services and strategic initiatives.

Depreciation and amortization expense for the dialysis and related lab services for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009 were $55,072 and $166,844, respectively, and were $1,741 and $5,277, respectively, for the ancillary services and strategic initiatives.


	September 30, 2010		December 31, 2009		March 31, 2011		December 31, 2010
Segment assets
Dialysis and related lab services	$	7,409,828	$	7,333,850	$	8,075,518	$	7,862,882
Other – Ancillary services and strategic initiatives		217,277		224,386		222,925		225,624
Equity investments						24,498		25,918

Consolidated assets	$	7,627,105	$	7,558,236	$	8,322,941	$	8,114,424

For the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2011, the total amount of expenditures for property and equipment for the dialysis and related lab services were $67,119 and were $1,563 for the ancillary services and strategic initiatives.

For the three months ended March 31, 2010, the total amount of expenditures for property and equipment for the dialysis and related lab services ~~were $67,739~~was $45,034, and ~~$168,054, respectively, and were $2,286 and $4,108, respectively,~~was $337 for the ancillary services and strategic initiatives.

For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009, the total amount of expenditures for property and equipment for the dialysis and related lab services were $66,863 and $203,315, respectively, and were $585 and $2,338, respectively, for the ancillary services and strategic initiatives.

~~11.~~12. Changes in DaVita Inc.’s ownership interest in consolidated subsidiaries

The effects of changes in DaVita Inc.’s ownership interest on the Company’s equity are as follows:


	Three months ended March 31,
	2011			2010
Net income attributable to DaVita Inc.	$	94,502		$	109,423

Increase in paid-in capital for sales of noncontrolling interests in one joint venture in each period		27			52
(Decrease) increase in paid-in capital for the purchase of noncontrolling interests in one joint venture in each period		(614	)		213

Net transfer (to) from noncontrolling interests		(587	)		265

Change from net income attributable to DaVita Inc. and transfers (to) from noncontrolling interests	$	93,915		$	109,688

Effective January 1, 2010, the FASB eliminated the quantitative approach previously required for determining the primary beneficiary of a variable interest entity, and required additional disclosures about an enterprise’s involvement in variable interest entities. An entity is required to perform an analysis to determine whether the enterprise’s variable interest or interests give it a controlling financial interest in a variable interest entity by having both the power to direct the activities of a variable interest entity that most significantly impact the entity’s economic performance and the obligation to absorb losses of the entity, or the right to receive benefits from the entity. In addition, the FASB established new guidance for determining whether an entity is a variable interest entity, requiring an ongoing reassessment of whether an enterprise is the primary beneficiary of a variable interest entity, and adding an additional reconsideration event for determining whether an entity is a variable interest entity when any changes in facts and circumstances occur such that the holders of the equity investment at risk, as a group, lose the power from voting rights or similar rights of those investments to direct the activities of the entity that most significantly impact the entity’s economic performance. Except for the new disclosures requirements, there was no other impact to the Company’s financial statements as a result of implementing these new requirements.

The Company is deemed to be the primary beneficiary of all of the variable interest entities (“VIEs”) with which it is associated. These VIEs are principally operating subsidiaries owned by related party nominee owners for the Company’s benefit in jurisdictions in which the Company does not qualify for direct ownership under applicable regulations or joint ventures that require subordinated support in addition to their equity capital to finance operations. These include both dialysis ~~operating entities in New York and other states~~operations and physician practice management ~~entities in various states.~~entities.

Under the terms of the applicable arrangements, the Company bears ~~most~~substantially all of the economic risks and rewards of ownership for these operating ~~VIE’s. The~~VIEs. In some cases, the Company has contractual arrangements with its respective related party nominee owners which indemnify them from the economic losses, and entitle the

Company to the economic benefits, that may result from ownership of these VIEs. DaVita Inc. manages these ~~VIE subsidiaries~~VIEs and provides operating and capital funding as necessary to accomplish ~~its~~their operational and strategic objectives. Accordingly, since the Company bears the majority of the risks and rewards attendant to their ownership, the Company consolidates these ~~variable interest entities~~VIEs as their primary beneficiary.

Total assets of these consolidated operating VIEs were approximately ~~$25,000~~$6,000 and their liabilities to unrelated third parties were approximately ~~$15,000~~$6,000 at ~~September 30, 2010.~~March 31, 2011.

The Company also sponsors certain deferred compensation plans whose trusts qualify as VIEs and as their primary beneficiary the Company consolidates each of these plans. The assets of these plans are recorded in short-term or long-term investments with matching offsetting liabilities in accrued compensation and benefits and other long-term liabilities. See Note 6 for disclosures onof the assets of these consolidated non-qualified deferred compensation plans.

The following information is presented in accordance with Rule 3-10 of Regulation S-X. The operating and investing activities of the separate legal entities included in the consolidated financial statements are fully interdependent and integrated. Revenues and operating expenses of the separate legal entities include intercompany charges for management and other services. The ~~Existing Notes~~senior notes were issued by the Company on October 20, 2010, and are guaranteed by substantially all of the Company’s direct and indirect domestic wholly-owned subsidiaries. Each of the guarantor subsidiaries has guaranteed the notes on a joint and several, full and unconditional basis. Non-wholly-owned subsidiaries, certain wholly-owned subsidiaries, foreign subsidiaries, joint venture partnerships and other third parties are not guarantors of these obligations.


For the three months ended September 30, 2010	DaVita Inc.			Guarantor subsidiaries			Non-Guarantor subsidiaries			Consolidating adjustments			Consolidated total
For the three months ended March 31, 2011																DaVita Inc.			Guarantor subsidiaries			Non-Guarantor subsidiaries			Consolidating adjustments			Consolidated total
Net operating revenues																$	103,273		$	1,329,320		$	326,345		$	(152,980	)	$	1,605,958
Operating expenses																	66,374			1,176,089			280,922			(152,980	)		1,370,405

Operating income																	36,899			153,231			45,423			—			235,553
Debt (expense)																	(58,865	)		(54,140	)		(180	)		54,590			(58,595	)
Other income																	54,867			315			249			(54,590	)		841
Income tax expense																	13,160			49,850			37			—			63,047
Equity earnings in subsidiaries																	74,761			25,867			—			(100,628	)		—

Net income																	94,502			75,423			45,455			(100,628	)		114,752

Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests																	—			—			—			(20,250	)		(20,250	)

Net income attributable to DaVita Inc.																$	94,502		$	75,423		$	45,455		$	(120,878	)	$	94,502


For the three months ended March 31, 2010
Net operating revenues	$	113,670		$	1,363,230		$	292,173		$	(117,424	)	$	1,651,649		$	103,668		$	1,269,471		$	301,778		$	(115,499	)	$	1,559,418
Operating expenses		63,399			1,232,959			216,124			(117,424	)		1,395,058			60,035			1,115,004			257,212			(115,499	)		1,316,752

Operating income		50,271			130,271			76,049			—			256,591			43,633			154,467			44,566			—			242,666
Debt (expense)		(39,961	)		(36,507	)		(75	)		37,053			(39,490	)		(44,698	)		(42,762	)		(373	)		43,250			(44,583	)
Other income		37,683			—			129			(37,053	)		759			43,255			675			151			(43,250	)		831
Income tax expense		18,560			55,603			816			—			74,979			16,960			55,210			1,744			—			73,914
Equity earnings in subsidiaries		89,954			51,424			—			(141,378	)		—			84,193			26,693			—			(110,886	)		—

Net income		119,387			89,585			75,287			(141,378	)		142,881			109,423			83,863			42,600			(110,886	)		125,000
Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests		—			—			—			(23,494	)		(23,494	)		—			—			—			(15,577	)		(15,577	)

Net income attributable to DaVita Inc.	$	119,387		$	89,585		$	75,287		$	(164,872	)	$	119,387		$	109,423		$	83,863		$	42,600		$	(126,463	)	$	109,423


For the three months ended September 30, 2009
Net operating revenues	$	104,771		$	1,310,558		$	269,201		$	(110,615	)	$	1,573,915
Operating expenses		57,742			1,158,277			223,510			(110,615	)		1,328,914

Operating income		47,029			152,281			45,691			—			245,001
Debt (expense)		(46,434	)		(37,146	)		(253	)		38,298			(45,535	)
Other income		39,175			—			122			(38,298	)		999
Income tax expense		15,854			56,754			1,587			—			74,195
Equity earnings in subsidiaries		87,014			28,298			—			(115,312	)		—

Net income		110,930			86,679			43,973			(115,312	)		126,270
Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests		—			—			—			(15,340	)		(15,340	)

Net income attributable to DaVita Inc.	$	110,930		$	86,679		$	43,973		$	(130,652	)	$	110,930


For the nine months ended September 30, 2010
Net operating revenues	$	327,095		$	3,954,517		$	859,170		$	(342,808	)	$	4,797,974
Operating expenses		189,676			3,528,983			680,501			(342,808	)		4,056,352

Operating income		137,419			425,534			178,669			—			741,622
Debt (expense)		(132,762	)		(120,122	)		(408	)		121,437			(131,855	)
Other income		122,823			—			943			(121,437	)		2,329
Income tax expense		50,355			166,109			3,858			—			220,322
Equity earnings in subsidiaries		259,538			119,016			—			(378,554	)		—

Net income		336,663			258,319			175,346			(378,554	)		391,774
Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests		—			—			—			(55,111	)		(55,111	)

Net income attributable to DaVita Inc.	$	336,663		$	258,319		$	175,346		$	(433,665	)	$	336,663


For the nine months ended September 30, 2009
Net operating revenues	$	296,696		$	3,800,836		$	758,233		$	(315,169	)	$	4,540,596
Operating expenses		181,435			3,336,776			635,995			(315,169	)		3,839,037

Operating income		115,261			464,060			122,238			—			701,559
Debt (expense)		(142,757	)		(116,095	)		(1,062	)		118,990			(140,924	)
Other income		121,628			—			388			(118,990	)		3,026
Income tax expense		37,653			167,702			4,130			—			209,485
Equity earnings in subsidiaries		256,481			74,180			—			(330,661	)		—

Net income		312,960			254,443			117,434			(330,661	)		354,176
Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests		—			—			—			(41,216	)		(41,216	)

Net income attributable to DaVita Inc.	$	312,960		$	254,443		$	117,434		$	(371,877	)	$	312,960


As of September 30, 2010	DaVita Inc.		Guarantor subsidiaries		Non-Guarantor subsidiaries		Consolidating adjustments			Consolidated total
As of March 31, 2011												DaVita Inc.		Guarantor subsidiaries		Non-Guarantor subsidiaries		Consolidating adjustments			Consolidated total
Cash and cash equivalents	$	533,417	$	—	$	1,148	$	—		$	534,565	$	1,004,469	$	—	$	1,541	$	—		$	1,006,010
Accounts receivable, net		—		934,513		148,163		—			1,082,676		—		916,459		152,978		—			1,069,437
Other current assets		8,004		611,513		25,247		—			644,764		12,594		593,568		45,307		—			651,469

Total current assets		541,421		1,546,026		174,558		—			2,262,005		1,017,063		1,510,027		199,826		—			2,726,916
Property and equipment, net		27,264		905,985		188,355		—			1,121,604		36,216		887,597		259,931		—			1,183,744
Amortizable intangibles, net		21,976		99,319		2,922		—			124,217		56,489		95,813		4,312		—			156,614
Investments in subsidiaries		5,402,889		496,657		—		(5,899,546	)		—		6,263,350		617,878		—		(6,881,228	)		—
Intercompany receivables		—		11,120		146,623		(157,743	)		—		—		639,505		207,852		(847,357	)		—
Other long-term assets and investments		8,153		57,450		553		—			66,156		18,132		54,549		910		—			73,591
Goodwill		—		3,709,018		344,105		—			4,053,123		—		3,744,789		437,287		—			4,182,076

Total assets	$	6,001,703	$	6,825,575	$	857,116	$	(6,057,289	)	$	7,627,105	$	7,391,250	$	7,550,158	$	1,110,118	$	(7,728,585	)	$	8,322,941

Current liabilities	$	64,000	$	975,885	$	71,899	$	—		$	1,111,784	$	120,840	$	811,874	$	74,659	$	—		$	1,007,373
Intercompany payables		128,747		17,876		11,120		(157,743	)		—		735,404		—		111,953		(847,357	)		—
Long-term debt and other long-term liabilities		3,245,019		511,017		14,440		—			3,770,476		4,196,065		556,175		20,439		—			4,772,679
Noncontrolling interests subject to put provisions		242,504		—		—		125,865			368,369		264,546		—		—		141,442			405,988
Total DaVita Inc. shareholders’ equity		2,321,433		5,320,797		578,749		(5,899,546	)		2,321,433		2,074,395		6,182,109		699,119		(6,881,228	)		2,074,395
Noncontrolling interest not subject to put provisions		—		—		180,908		(125,865	)		55,043		—		—		203,948		(141,442	)		62,506

Total equity		2,321,433		5,320,797		759,657		(6,025,411	)		2,376,476		2,074,395		6,182,109		903,067		(7,022,670	)		2,136,901

Total liabilities and equity	$	6,001,703	$	6,825,575	$	857,116	$	(6,057,289	)	$	7,627,105	$	7,391,250	$	7,550,158	$	1,110,118	$	(7,728,585	)	$	8,322,941


As of December 31, 2009
As of December 31, 2010
Cash and cash equivalents	$	534,550	$	—	$	4,909	$	—		$	539,459	$	856,803	$	—	$	3,314	$	—		$	860,117
Accounts receivable, net		—		961,946		143,957		—			1,105,903		—		895,955		153,021		—			1,048,976
Other current assets		15,619		597,086		44,454		—			657,159		11,231		653,670		48,860		—			713,761

Total current assets		550,169		1,559,032		193,320		—			2,302,521		868,034		1,549,625		205,195		—			2,622,854
Property and equipment, net		11,232		900,969		192,724		—			1,104,925		30,409		888,927		251,472		—			1,170,808
Amortizable intangibles, net		30,212		101,931		4,589		—			136,732		58,967		98,795		4,873		—			162,635
Investments in subsidiaries		5,130,035		509,733		—		(5,639,768	)		—		6,154,398		555,579		—		(6,709,977	)		—
Intercompany receivables		293,062		—		138,482		(431,544	)		—		—		516,286		208,030		(724,316	)		—
Other long-term assets and investments		7,700		19,528		35,634		—			62,862		8,951		56,996		873		—			66,820
Goodwill		—		3,622,885		328,311		—			3,951,196		—		3,731,983		359,324		—			4,091,307

Total assets	$	6,022,410	$	6,714,078	$	893,060	$	(6,071,312	)	$	7,558,236	$	7,120,759	$	7,398,191	$	1,029,767	$	(7,434,293	)	$	8,114,424

Current liabilities	$	170,061	$	781,870	$	95,010	$	—		$	1,046,941	$	61,384	$	786,114	$	76,847	$	—		$	924,345
Intercompany payables		—		418,529		13,015		(431,544	)		—		611,919		—		112,397		(724,316	)		—
Long-term debt and other long-term liabilities		3,507,753		458,779		18,879		—			3,985,411		4,210,703		539,620		19,570		—			4,769,893
Noncontrolling interests subject to put provisions		209,530		—		—		122,195			331,725		258,331		—		—		124,721			383,052
Total DaVita Inc. shareholders’ equity		2,135,066		5,054,900		584,868		(5,639,768	)		2,135,066		1,978,422		6,072,457		637,520		(6,709,977	)		1,978,422
Noncontrolling interest not subject to put provisions		—		—		181,288		(122,195	)		59,093		—		—		183,433		(124,721	)		58,712

Total equity		2,135,066		5,054,900		766,156		(5,761,963	)		2,194,159		1,978,422		6,072,457		820,953		(6,834,698	)		2,037,134

Total liabilities and equity	$	6,022,410	$	6,714,078	$	893,060	$	(6,071,312	)	$	7,558,236	$	7,120,759	$	7,398,191	$	1,029,767	$	(7,434,293	)	$	8,114,424


For the nine months ended September 30, 2010	DaVita Inc.			Guarantor subsidiaries			Non-Guarantor subsidiaries			Consolidating adjustments			Consolidated total
For the three months ended March 31, 2011																DaVita Inc.			Guarantor subsidiaries			Non-Guarantor subsidiaries			Consolidating adjustments			Consolidated total
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income	$	336,663		$	258,319		$	175,346		$	(378,554	)	$	391,774		$	94,502		$	75,423		$	45,455		$	(100,628	)	$	114,752
Changes in operating assets and liabilities and non-cash items included in net income		(561,408	)		593,402			(83,190	)		378,554			327,358			(18,903	)		120,077			13,229			100,628			215,031

Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities		(224,745	)		851,721			92,156			—			719,132
Net cash provided by operating activities																	75,599			195,500			58,684			—			329,783

Cash flows from investing activities:
Additions of property and equipment, net		(19,797	)		(126,490	)		(23,089	)		—			(169,376	)		(6,946	)		(41,030	)		(19,554	)		—			(67,530	)
Acquisitions		—			(137,643	)		—			—			(137,643	)		—			(81,523	)		—			—			(81,523	)
Proceeds from asset sales		—			18,471			—			—			18,471			—			2,812			—			—			2,812
Proceeds from investment sales and other items		(300	)		3,535			—			—			3,235			850			3			—			—			853

Net cash used in investing activities		(20,097	)		(242,127	)		(23,089	)		—			(285,313	)		(6,096	)		(119,738	)		(19,554	)		—			(145,388	)

Cash flows from financing activities:
Long-term debt and related financing costs, net		(270,481	)		3,921			(6,990	)		—			(273,550	)		(31,425	)		(147	)		663			—			(30,909	)
Intercompany borrowing		621,409			(611,318	)		(10,091	)		—			—			98,982			(75,644	)		(23,338	)		—			—
Other items		(107,219	)		(2,197	)		(55,747	)		—			(165,163	)		10,606			29			(18,228	)		—			(7,593	)

Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities		243,709			(609,594	)		(72,828	)		—			(438,713	)		78,163			(75,762	)		(40,903	)		—			(38,502	)

Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents		(1,133	)		—			(3,761	)		—			(4,894	)
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents																	147,666			—			(1,773	)		—			145,893
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period		534,550			—			4,909			—			539,459			856,803			—			3,314			—			860,117

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	533,417		$	—		$	1,148		$	—		$	534,565		$	1,004,469		$	—		$	1,541		$	—		$	1,006,010


For the nine months ended September 30, 2009
For the three months ended March 31, 2010
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income	$	312,960		$	254,443		$	117,434		$	(330,661	)	$	354,176		$	109,423		$	83,863		$	42,600		$	(110,886	)	$	125,000
Changes in operating assets and liabilities and non-cash items included in net income		(637,351	)		450,984			15,649			330,661			159,943			(82,716	)		101,193			7,484			110,886			136,847

Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities		(324,391	)		705,427			133,083			—			514,119
Net cash provided by operating activities																	26,707			185,056			50,084			—			261,847

Cash flows from investing activities:
Additions of property and equipment, net		(944	)		(156,362	)		(48,347	)		—			(205,653	)		(2,683	)		(31,072	)		(8,830	)		—			(42,585	)
Acquisitions		—			(64,001	)		—			—			(64,001	)		—			(1,069	)		—			—			(1,069	)
Proceeds from asset sales		—			6,256			—			—			6,256			—			16,264			—			—			16,264
Proceeds from investment sales and other items		14,800			(150	)		—			—			14,650			114			3,713			—			—			3,827

Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities		13,856			(214,257	)		(48,347	)		—			(248,748	)
Net cash used in investing activities																	(2,569	)		(12,164	)		(8,830	)		—			(23,563	)

Cash flows from financing activities:
Long-term debt and related financing costs, net		(38,632	)		(1,289	)		2,854			—			(37,067	)		(23,460	)		(1,729	)		148			—			(25,041	)
Intercompany borrowing		539,452			(490,946	)		(48,506	)		—			—			196,187			(168,964	)		(27,223	)		—			—
Other items		(22,799	)		1,065			(35,771	)		—			(57,505	)		22,451			(2,199	)		(17,045	)		—			3,207

Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities		478,021			(491,170	)		(81,423	)		—			(94,572	)		195,178			(172,892	)		(44,120	)		—			(21,834	)

Net increase in cash and cash equivalents		167,486			—			3,313			—			170,799
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents																	219,316			—			(2,866	)		—			216,450
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period		397,576			—			13,305			—			410,881			534,550			—			4,909			—			539,459

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	565,062		$	—		$	16,618		$	—		$	581,680		$	753,866		$	—		$	2,043		$	—		$	755,909

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains ~~statements that are~~ forward-looking statements within the meaning of the federal securities laws. All statements that do not concern historical facts are forward-looking statements and include, among other things, statements about our expectations, beliefs, intentions and/or strategies for the future. These forward-looking statements include statements regarding our future operations, financial condition and prospects, expectations for treatment growth rates, revenue per treatment, expense growth, levels of the provision for uncollectible accounts receivable, operating income, cash flow, operating cash flow, estimated tax rates, capital expenditures, the development of new centers and center acquisitions, government and commercial payment rates, revenue estimating risk and the impact of our related level of indebtedness on our financial performance, including earnings per share. These statements involve substantial known and unknown risks and uncertainties that could cause our actual results to differ materially from those described in the forward-looking statements, including, but not limited to, risks resulting from ~~the regulatory environment in which we operate,~~uncertainties associated with governmental regulations, general economic and other market conditions, ~~competitive activities, other business conditions,~~competition, accounting estimates, the variability of our cash flows, the concentration of profits generated from commercial payor plans, continued downward pressure on average realized payment rates from commercial payors, which may result in the loss of revenue or patients, a reduction in the number of patients under higher-paying commercial plans, a reduction in government payment rates or changes to the structure of payments under the Medicare ESRD program or other government-based programs, ~~including, for example, the implementation of a bundled payment rate system beginning January 2011, which will lower reimbursement for services we provide to Medicare patients, and~~ the impact of health care reform legislation that was enacted in the United States in March 2010, changes in pharmaceutical or anemia management practice patterns, payment policies, or pharmaceutical pricing, our ability to maintain contracts with physician medical directors, legal compliance risks, including our continued compliance with complex government regulations, the resolution of ongoing investigations by various federal and state ~~government~~governmental agencies, continued increased competition from large and medium sized dialysis providers that compete directly with us, our ability to complete any acquisitions, mergers or dispositions that we might be considering or announce, or integrate and successfully operate any business we may acquire, expansion of our operations and services to markets outside of the United States and the other risk factors set forth in Part II, Item 1A. of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. We base our forward-looking statements on information currently available to us, and we undertake no obligation to update or revise ~~these~~any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of changes in underlying factors, new information, future events or otherwise.

The following should be read in conjunction with our condensed consolidated financial statements.

We operate principally as a dialysis and related lab services business but also operate other ancillary services and strategic initiatives. These ancillary services and strategic initiatives consist of pharmacy services, infusion therapy services, disease management services, vascular access services, ESRD clinical research programs and physician services. The dialysis and related lab services business qualifies as a separately reportable segment and all of the other ancillary services and strategic initiatives segments have been combined and disclosed in the other segments category.

Our consolidated operating results for the ~~third~~first quarter of ~~2010~~2011 compared with the prior sequential quarter and the same quarter of ~~2009 as well as the nine months ended September 30,~~ 2010 ~~compared to the same period in 2009~~ were as follows:


	Three months ended															Nine months ended										Quarter ended
	September 30, 2010					June 30, 2010					September 30, 2009					September 30, 2010					September 30, 2009					March 31, 2011					December 31, 2010					March 31, 2010
	(dollar amounts rounded to nearest million)																									(dollar amounts rounded to nearest million)
Net operating revenues	$	1,652		100	%	$	1,587		100	%	$	1,574		100	%	$	4,798		100	%	$	4,541		100	%	$	1,606		100	%	$	1,649		100	%	$	1,559		100	%

Operating expenses and charges:
Patient care costs		1,146		69	%		1,111		70	%		1,096		70	%		3,340		70	%		3,154		70	%		1,116		69	%		1,135		69	%		1,083		69	%
General and administrative		148		9	%		136		9	%		135		9	%		421		9	%		394		9	%		152		9	%		158		10	%		137		9	%
Depreciation and amortization		58		4	%		58		4	%		57		4	%		174		4	%		172		4	%		62		4	%		60		4	%		57		4	%
Provision for uncollectible accounts		44		3	%		42		3	%		42		3	%		128		3	%		120		3	%		42		3	%		43		3	%		42		3	%
Equity investment income		(2	)	—			(3	)	—			(1	)	—			(7	)	—			(1	)	—			(2	)	—			(2	)	—			(2	)	—

Total operating expenses and charges		1,395		85	%		1,345		85	%		1,329		84	%		4,056		85	%		3,839		85	%		1,370		85	%		1,394		85	%		1,317		84	%

Operating income	$	257		15	%	$	242		15	%	$	245		16	%	$	742		15	%	$	702		15	%	$	236		15	%	$	255		16	%	$	243		16	%


	Three months ended						Nine months ended				Three months ended
	September 30, 2010		June 30, 2010		September 30, 2009		September 30, 2010		September 30, 2009		March 31, 2011			December 31, 2010			March 31, 2010
	(dollar amounts rounded to nearest million)										(dollar amounts rounded to nearest million)
Dialysis and related lab services	$	1,553	$	1,496	$	1,491	$	4,528	$	4,309	$	1,505		$	1,545		$	1,478
Other – Ancillary Services and Strategic Initiatives		98		91		83		270		232		106			107			84

Total segment revenues												1,611			1,652			1,562
Elimination of intersegment revenues												(5	)		(3	)		(3	)

Consolidated net operating revenues	$	1,652	$	1,587	$	1,574	$	4,798	$	4,541	$	1,606		$	1,649		$	1,559

Consolidated net operating revenues for the ~~third~~first quarter of ~~2010 increased~~2011 decreased by approximately ~~$65~~$43 million, or approximately ~~4.1%~~2.6%, as compared to the ~~second~~fourth quarter of 2010. The decrease in consolidated net operating revenues was primarily due to a decrease in dialysis and related lab services net revenues of approximately $40 million, principally due to a decrease in the number of treatments as a result of fewer treatment days in the first quarter of 2011 and a decrease of approximately $5 in the average dialysis revenue per treatment primarily from a decrease in our Medicare revenues as a result of operating in the new single bundled payment system, as described below.

Consolidated net operating revenues for the first quarter of 2011 increased by approximately $47 million, or approximately 3.0%, as compared to the first quarter of 2010. The increase in consolidated net operating revenues was primarily due to an increase in dialysis and related lab services net revenues of approximately ~~$57~~$27 million, principally due to ~~an increase in the number of~~strong volume growth from additional treatments as a result of one additional treatment day in the third quarter of 2010 and additional treatments from non-acquired growth and acquisitions, as well as an increase of approximately $4 in the average dialysis revenue per treatment. The increase in consolidated net revenues was also due to an increase of approximately $7 million in the ancillary services and strategic initiatives net revenues primarily as a result of volume growth in our pharmacy services.

Consolidated net operating revenues for the third quarter of 2010 increased by approximately $78 million, or approximately 5.0%, as compared to the third quarter of 2009. The increase in consolidated net operating revenues was primarily due to an increase in dialysis and related lab services net revenues of approximately $62 million, principally due to an increase in the number of treatments from non-acquired treatment growth in existing and new centers and growth through acquisitions, partially offset by a decrease of approximately $4$18 in the average dialysis revenue per ~~treatment.~~treatment, as described below. The increase in consolidated net revenues was also due to an increase of approximately ~~$15~~$22 million in the ancillary services and strategic initiatives net revenues primarily from growth in our pharmacy services.

Consolidated net operating revenues for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 increased by approximately $257 million, or approximately 5.7%, as compared to same period in 2009. The increase in consolidated net operating revenues was primarily due to an increase in dialysis and related lab services net revenues of approximately $219 million, principally due to an increase in the number of treatments from non-acquired treatment growth in existing and new centers and growth through acquisitions, partially offset by a decrease of approximately $1 in the average dialysis revenue per treatment. The increase in consolidated net revenues was also due to an increase of approximately $38 million in the ancillary services and strategic initiatives net revenues primarily from growth in our pharmacy services, partially offset by a decrease in revenue in our disease management services and in our clinical research services.

Consolidated operating income for the ~~third~~first quarter of ~~2010 increased~~2011 decreased by approximately ~~$15~~$19 million, or approximately ~~6.2%~~7.5%, as compared to the ~~second~~fourth quarter of 2010. The ~~increase~~decrease in consolidated operating income was primarily due to ~~strong treatment growth as~~ a result of one additional treatment day in the quarter and from non-acquired growth and acquisitions as well as an increase of approximately $4 in the average dialysis revenue per treatment. The increase was partially offset by higher labor and benefit costs, higher pharmaceuticals costs, a decline in the intensities of physician-prescribed pharmaceuticals, a decline in productivity and an increase in professional fees.

Consolidated operating income for the third quarter of 2010 increased by $12 million, or approximately 4.9%, as compared to the third quarter of 2009. The increase in consolidated operating income was primarily due to growth in revenuedecrease in the dialysis and related lab services ~~primarily from additional~~net revenues, principally due to a decrease in the number of treatments ~~partially offset by~~as a result of fewer treatment days in the first quarter of 2011 and a decrease of approximately $5 in the average dialysis revenue per treatment. Consolidated operating income also ~~increased~~decreased as a result of ~~cost control initiatives, improved~~seasonally higher payroll taxes, a decline in productivity ~~as well as~~and the timing of certain other operating costs, partially offset by lower pharmaceutical and benefit costs including a ~~decrease of $3 million in operating losses~~decline in the ~~ancillary services and strategic initiatives. However,~~intensities of physician-prescribed pharmaceuticals.

Consolidated operating income for the first quarter of 2011 decreased by approximately $7 million, or approximately 2.9%, as compared to the first quarter of 2010. The decrease in consolidated operating income was ~~negatively impacted~~primarily due to a decline in the average dialysis revenue per treatment of approximately $18 as described below. Consolidated operating income also decreased as a result of higher labor and related payroll costs, additional costs of operating our dialysis centers and an increase in professional fees in conjunction with acquisition-related transactions, and for compliance and international initiatives, partially offset by overall lower pharmaceutical costs including a decline in the intensities of physician-prescribed pharmaceuticals ~~higher labor costs~~ and ~~pharmaceutical costs and an increase in professional fees.~~

Consolidated operating income for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 increased by $40 million, or approximately 5.7%, as compared to the same period in 2009. The increase in consolidated operating income was primarily due tostrong volume growth in revenue from additional treatments in the dialysis and related lab ~~services, primarily from additional treatments,~~

cost control initiatives, improved productivity and lower benefit costs, partially offset by higher pharmaceutical costs, labor costs and related payroll taxes and an increase in other operating costs of our dialysis centers.services.


	Three months ended						Nine months ended				Three months ended
	September 30, 2010		June 30, 2010		September 30, 2009		September 30, 2010		September 30, 2009		March 31, 2011		December 31, 2010		March 31, 2010
	(dollar amounts rounded to nearest million, except per treatment)										(dollar amounts rounded to nearest million, except per treatment data)
Revenues	$	1,553	$	1,496	$	1,491	$	4,528	$	4,309	$	1,505	$	1,545	$	1,478

Segment operating income	$	266	$	254	$	259	$	771	$	742	$	250	$	268	$	253

Dialysis treatments		4,578,622		4,462,565		4,339,195		13,335,307		12,649,812		4,602,375		4,657,498		4,294,121
Average dialysis treatments per treatment day		57,957		57,212		54,927		56,988		54,175		59,771		58,956		55,768
Average dialysis revenue per dialysis treatment (including the lab)	$	339	$	335	$	343	$	339	$	340
Average dialysis revenue per treatment (including lab services)											$	326	$	331	$	344

Dialysis and related lab services’ net operating revenues for the ~~third~~first quarter of ~~2010 increased~~2011 decreased by approximately ~~$57~~$40 million, or approximately ~~3.8%~~2.6%, as compared to the ~~second~~fourth quarter of 2010. The ~~increase~~decrease in net operating revenues was primarily due to ~~an increase~~a decrease in the number of treatments as a result of ~~one additional~~fewer treatment ~~day~~days in the ~~third~~first quarter of ~~2010 and additional treatments from non-acquired growth and acquisitions~~2011, totaling approximately ~~2.5%~~1.2%. This ~~increase~~decrease was also due to ~~an increase~~a decrease in our average dialysis revenue per treatment of approximately ~~$4,~~$5, or approximately ~~1.2%~~1.4%. The ~~increase~~decrease in the average

dialysis revenue per treatment was primarily due to a decline in our Medicare reimbursement rates as a result of operating in the new single bundled payment system, a continued decline in the commercial payor mix and a decline in the intensities of physician-prescribed pharmaceuticals, partially offset by an increase in some of our commercial payment rates, an increase in our reimbursement rates for average sale price, or ASP, associated with EPO and seasonal flu shots administrations, partially offset by a decline in the intensities of physician-prescribed pharmaceuticals and a decline in the commercial payor mix.rates.

Dialysis and related lab services’ net operating revenues increased by approximately ~~$62~~$27 million, or ~~4.2%~~1.8%, in the ~~third~~first quarter of ~~2010,~~2011, as compared to the ~~third~~first quarter of ~~2009.~~2010. The increase in net operating revenues in the ~~third~~first quarter of 2010 was principally due to an increase in the number of treatments of approximately ~~5.3%~~7.2%, partially offset by a decrease in the average dialysis revenue per treatment of approximately ~~$4,~~$18, or ~~1.3%~~approximately 5.0%. The increase in the number of treatments was primarily attributable to non-acquired treatment growth at existing and new centers and growth through acquisitions. The decrease in the average dialysis revenue per treatment was primarily due to a decline in our Medicare reimbursement rates as a result of operating in the new single bundled payment system, a decline in the commercial payor mix, and a decline in the intensities of physician-prescribed pharmaceuticals, ~~and a decrease in our reimbursement rates for ASP, associated with EPO,~~ partially offset by an increase in some of our commercial payment ~~rates, and a 1% increase in the Medicare composite rate.~~

Dialysis and related lab services’ net operating revenues increased by approximately $219 million, or 5.1%, for the nine months ended September 30, 2010, as compared to the same period in 2009. The increase in net operating revenues was principally due to an increase in the number of treatments, partially offset by a slight decrease of approximately $1 in the average dialysis revenue per treatment. The increase in the number of treatments was due to the same factors as discussed above for the increase in the third quarter of 2010 as compared to the third quarter of 2009.rates.

Patient care costs.Dialysis and related lab services’ patient care costs on a per treatment basis in the ~~third~~first quarter of ~~2010 increased~~2011 decreased by approximately ~~$1,~~$2, as compared to the ~~second~~fourth quarter of 2010. The ~~increase~~decrease in our

per treatment costs was attributable to several items including ~~an increase in labor~~lower pharmaceutical and benefit ~~costs, an increase in pharmaceutical~~ costs and a decline in ~~productivity,~~the intensities of physician-prescribed pharmaceuticals, partially offset by seasonally higher payroll taxes, a decline in productivity and an increase in the ~~intensity~~other operating costs of ~~physician-prescribed pharmaceuticals.~~our dialysis centers.

Dialysis and related lab services’ patient care costs on a per treatment basis decreased by approximately $5$14 in the ~~third~~first quarter of ~~2010~~2011 as compared to the ~~third~~first quarter of ~~2009.~~2010. The decrease in the per treatment costs was primarily attributable to ~~several items which include~~lower pharmaceutical costs and a decline in the intensities of physician-prescribed pharmaceuticals, ~~lower benefit costs and improved productivity,~~ partially offset by an increase in ~~other operating costs of our dialysis centers, an increase in pharmaceutical costs and an increase in labor costs.~~

Dialysis and related lab services’ patient care costs on a per treatment basis decreased by approximately $1 for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 as compared to the same period in 2009. The decrease in the per treatment costs was primarily attributable to several items which include improved productivity and lower benefit costs, partially offset by an increase in pharmaceuticals costs, labor costs ~~and related payroll taxes,~~ and other operating costs of our dialysis centers.

General and administrative expenses.Dialysis and related lab services’ general and administrative expenses of approximately ~~$122~~$125 million for the ~~third~~first quarter of ~~2010~~2011 decreased by approximately $4 million as compared to the fourth quarter of 2010. The decrease was primarily due to lower benefit costs and the timing of certain expenditures, partially offset by higher labor costs and seasonally higher payroll taxes, and an increase in professional fees in conjunction with acquisition-related transactions and compliance initiatives. General and administrative expenses increased by approximately $13 million in the first quarter of 2011, as compared to the ~~second quarter of~~same period in 2010. The increase was primarily due to higher ~~labor and benefit costs and related payroll taxes, higher~~information technology spend, an increase in professional fees in conjunction with acquisition-related transactions, and for ~~legal,~~ compliance and international initiatives and the timing of certain expenditures. In absolute dollars, general and administrative expenses increased by approximately $15 million in the third quarter of 2010, as compared to the same period in 2009. The increase was primarily due to the same factors as discussed above. General and administrative expenses as a percentage of dialysis and related lab services’ revenue was 7.8% for the third quarter of 2010, 7.3% for the second quarter of 2010 and was 7.1% for the third quarter of 2009.

In absolute dollars, general and administrative expenses increased by approximately $27 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010, as compared to the same period in 2009. The increase was primarily due to higher labor and benefit costs, related payroll costs and the timing of certainother expenditures. General and administrative expenses, as a percentage of dialysis and related lab services’ revenue, was 8.3% for the first quarter of 2011, 8.3% for the fourth quarter of 2010 and 7.6% for the ~~nine months ended September 30, 2010, as compared to 7.3% for the same period in 2009.~~first quarter of 2010.

Depreciation and amortization. Depreciation and amortization for dialysis and related lab services was approximately ~~$57~~$60 million infor the ~~both~~first quarter of 2011, $58 million for the ~~third quarter and second~~fourth quarter of 2010 ~~as compared to $55~~and $56 million for the ~~third~~first quarter of ~~2009.~~2010. The ~~slight increase of $2 million~~increases in depreciation and amortization ~~for dialysis and related lab services~~ in the ~~third~~first quarter of 2011, as compared to both the fourth quarter of 2010 ~~as compared to~~and the ~~third~~first quarter of ~~2009,~~2010, was primarily due to growth in newly developed centers and from centers through acquisitions.

Depreciation and amortization for dialysis and related lab services was approximately $169 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010, as compared to $167 million for the same period in 2009. This slight increase of $2 million was primarily due to growth in new centers and expansions of certain existing centers.

Provision for uncollectible accounts.The provision for uncollectible accounts receivable for dialysis and related lab services was 2.8% for all periods presented. We assess our level of the provision for uncollectible accounts based upon our historical cash collection experience and trends, and will adjust the provision as necessary as a result of changes in our cash collections.

Dialysis and related lab services’ operating income for the ~~third~~first quarter of ~~2010 increased~~2011 decreased by approximately ~~$12~~$18 million, as compared to the ~~second~~fourth quarter of 2010. The ~~increase~~decrease in operating income was primarily attributable to ~~an increase~~a decrease in revenue as a result of ~~additional treatments~~fewer treatment days in the ~~third~~first quarter of ~~2010~~2011 as described above, and ~~an increase~~a decrease in the average dialysis revenue per treatment of approximately ~~$4,~~$5, as also discussed

above. ~~However, dialysis~~Dialysis and related lab services’ operating income was also negatively affected by seasonally higher payroll taxes and a decline in productivity, partially offset by a decrease in lower pharmaceutical and benefit costs including a decline in the intensities of physician-prescribed ~~pharmaceuticals, higher labor and benefit costs, higher pharmaceuticals costs, a decline in productivity as well as an increase in professional fees.~~pharmaceuticals.

Dialysis and related lab services’ operating income for the ~~third~~first quarter of ~~2010 increased~~2011 decreased by approximately $7$3 million, as compared to the ~~third~~first quarter of ~~2009.~~2010. The ~~increase~~decrease in operating income was primarily attributable to a decline in the average dialysis revenue per treatment of approximately $18, as described above, higher labor costs and related payroll taxes, additional costs of operating our dialysis centers and an increase in professional fees in conjunction with acquisition-related transactions and compliance and international initiatives. However, operating income benefited from strong volume growth in revenue from additional treatments as a result of non-acquired treatment growth and growth through acquisitions, partially offset by a decrease in our average dialysis revenue per treatment of approximately $4 as discussed above. Dialysis and related lab services operating income also increased as a result of cost control initiatives and improved productivity, partially offset bylower pharmaceutical costs which includes a decline in ~~the~~ intensities of physician-prescribed ~~pharmaceuticals, an increase in labor costs and pharmaceutical costs, an increase in other operating costs of our dialysis centers as well as an increase in professional fees.~~

Dialysis and related lab services operating income for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 increased by approximately $29 million, as compared to the same period in 2009. The increase in operating income was primarily attributable to growth in revenue from additional treatments, cost control initiatives, improved productivity and lower benefit costs, partially offset by higher labor costs and related payroll taxes, pharmaceutical costs and other operating costs of our dialysis centers.pharmaceuticals.


	Three months ended								Nine months ended						Three months ended
	September 30, 2010		June 30, 2010			September 30, 2009			September 30, 2010			September 30, 2009			March 31, 2011			December 31, 2010			March 31, 2010
	(dollar amounts rounded to nearest million)														(dollar amounts rounded to nearest million)
Revenues	$	98	$	91		$	83		$	270		$	232		$	106		$	107		$	84

Segment operating (loss)	$	—	$	(2	)	$	(3	)	$	(3	)	$	(8	)	$	(6	)	$	(2	)	$	(2	)

The ancillary services and strategic initiatives’ net operating revenues for the ~~third~~first quarter of ~~2010 increased~~2011 decreased by approximately $7$1 million as compared to the ~~second~~fourth quarter of 2010. The ~~increase~~decrease was primarily ~~volume growth~~due to reductions in revenue in our pharmacy services ~~infusion therapy services and disease management services.~~

~~The increase~~due to fewer days in ~~net operating revenues for~~ the ~~third~~first quarter of ~~2010 of approximately $15 million, as compared to the third quarter of 2009, was primarily due to growth~~2011 and a reduction in other services revenue, and a reduction in revenues associated with our pharmacy services and in our infusion therapy services, partially offset by a decrease in net operating revenues in disease management services as a result of discontinuing the special needs plans and in ourESRD clinical research services.

The increase in net operating revenues for the ~~nine months ended September 30, 2010~~first quarter of 2011 of approximately ~~$38~~$22 million, as compared to the ~~same period in 2009,~~first quarter of 2010, was primarily due to volume growth in our pharmacy ~~services and in our infusion therapy services, partially offset by a decrease in disease management services as described above, and a decrease in our clinical research services and physician~~ services.

Ancillary services and strategic initiatives’ operating expenses for the ~~third~~first quarter of ~~2010~~2011 increased by approximately $5$3 million as compared to the ~~second~~fourth quarter of 2010, primarily as a result of ~~volume growth~~an increase in labor costs in our home infusion and pharmacy services, an increase in patient claims in our disease management services and an increase in our pharmaceutical costs in our pharmacy services.

Ancillary services and strategic initiatives’ operating expenses for the ~~third~~first quarter of ~~2010~~2011 increased by approximately ~~$12~~$27 million as compared to the same period in ~~2009,~~2010, primarily due to volume growth ~~associated with the~~in our pharmacy services, an increase in pharmaceutical costs and a slight ~~increases~~increase in labor and benefit ~~costs, partially offset by lower costs as a result of discontinuing the disease management services special needs plans.~~

Ancillary services and strategic initiatives’ operating expenses for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 increased by approximately $33 million as compared to the same period in 2009. The increase was attributable to the same factors that were discussed above for the increase in operating expenses for the third quarter of 2010 as compared to the third quarter of 2009.costs.

Ancillary services and strategic initiatives’ operating ~~results broke even for~~losses grew by approximately $4 million in the ~~third~~first quarter of ~~2010, which represented a decrease in the loss of $2 million~~2011, as compared to the ~~second~~fourth quarter of 2010, and ~~a decrease in the loss of approximately $3 million~~ as compared to the ~~third~~first quarter of ~~2009.~~2010. The

increase in operating losses in the ancillary services and strategic initiatives ~~operating results~~ in the ~~third~~first quarter of ~~2010~~2011 as compared to the ~~second~~fourth quarter of 2010 ~~benefited~~was primarily due to a decrease in the operating performance in our pharmacy services as a result of a decrease in revenue from fewer days in the first quarter of 2011 and a reduction in other services revenue, as well as a decrease in the operating performance of our disease management services and in our ESRD clinical research services, partially offset by improved operating performance in our vascular access services.

The increase of $4 million in operating losses in the first quarter of 2011 as compared to the first quarter of 2010 was primarily the result of a decrease in the operating performance in our disease management services, ~~and~~ our ~~vascular access services.~~

~~The decrease of $3 million in operating losses in the third quarter of 2010 as compared to the third quarter of 2009 was primarily the result of volume growth in our pharmacy~~infusion therapy services and ~~improved operating performance in our disease management services and in our physician services,~~other initiatives, partially offset by ~~a reduction in operating income associated with our infusion therapy services.~~

Ancillary services and strategic initiatives’ operating losses for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 decreased by approximately $5 million as compared to the same period in 2009. The decrease was attributable to the same factors that were discussed above for the decrease in operating losses for the third quarter of 2010 as compared to the third quarter of 2009. In addition, the ancillary services and strategic initiatives operating losses were also negatively impacted by a reduction in operating incomeimproved performance in our vascular access services.

Stock-based compensation. Stock-based compensation of approximately ~~$11.1~~$9.7 million in the ~~third~~first quarter of ~~2010~~2011 represented a decrease of approximately ~~$1.1~~$2.4 million as compared to the ~~second~~fourth quarter of 2010 and a decrease of approximately ~~$0.3~~$0.5 million as compared to the ~~third~~first quarter of ~~2009. Stock-based compensation for~~2010. The decrease in the ~~nine months ended September 30, 2010~~first quarter of ~~$33.5 million decreased approximately $0.4 million~~2011 as compared to ~~the same period~~both periods in ~~2009. The decreases in stock-based compensation for the three and nine months ended September 30,~~ 2010 ~~each resulted~~was primarily ~~from reductions during the third quarter of 2010~~due to a decrease in the ~~number~~aggregate quantity of ~~stock~~grants that contributed expense to these respective periods, partially offset by an increase in the grant-date fair value of awards ~~we expect~~made in 2010 and 2011 to ~~vest.~~date.

Other income.Other income for the ~~third~~first quarter of 2011 decreased by approximately $0.3 million as compared to the fourth quarter of 2010 and was ~~relatively~~ flat as compared to the ~~second~~first quarter of 2010, ~~and decreased by approximately $0.2 million as compared to the third quarter of 2009,~~ respectively.

Debt expense.Debt expense of ~~$39.5~~$58.6 million in the ~~third~~first quarter of ~~2010 decreased~~2011 increased by approximately ~~$4.2~~$4.7 million from the ~~second~~fourth quarter of 2010 and ~~decreased~~increased by ~~$6.0~~$14 million, as compared to the ~~third~~first quarter of ~~2009.~~2010. The ~~decreases~~increases were primarily due to additional borrowings under our new Senior Secured Credit Facilities that was issued on October 20, 2010 that contain significantly higher interest rates than the ~~redemption~~interest rates under our previous facility. In addition, debt expense in the first quarter of ~~$200 million aggregate principal~~2011 was also impacted by the amount of interest rate swaps that went effective on January 31, 2011, that will result in a higher overall weighted average effective interest rate on the Term Loan A and from the amortization of the interest rate cap premiums. However, debt expense in the first quarter of 2011, benefited from lower rates associated with the issuance of our ~~outstanding 6~~⁵~~/8%~~new senior notes ~~due 2013 that occurred~~ on ~~June 7, 2010. In addition, the decrease in the third quarter of~~October 20, 2010, and as compared to the ~~third~~first quarter of ~~2009, was also due to~~2010, benefited from lower ~~average~~outstanding principal balances ~~outstanding~~ on our ~~Term Loan A and a decrease in our effective interest rate as a result of lower notional amounts of fixed rate swap agreements that contained higher rates.~~senior notes. The overall weighted average effective interest rate for the ~~third~~first quarter of ~~2010~~2011 was ~~4.45%~~5.20%, as compared to ~~4.68%~~4.86% for the ~~second~~fourth quarter of 2010 and ~~4.79%~~4.67% for the ~~third~~first quarter of ~~2009.~~2010.

For the nine months ended September 30, 2010, debt expense decreased by approximately $13.2 million, as compared to the same period in 2009. The decrease was primarily attributable to the same factors that were discussed above for the decrease in debt expense for the third quarter of 2010 as compared to the third quarter of 2009.

Equity investment income. Equity investment income was approximately ~~$1.8~~$1.5 million for the ~~third~~first quarter of ~~2010,~~2011, as compared to ~~$2.8~~$2.0 million and ~~$0.7~~$2.3 million for the ~~second~~fourth quarter of 2010 and the ~~third~~first quarter of ~~2009,~~2010, respectively. The decrease in equity income in the ~~third~~first quarter of ~~2010,~~2011, as compared to the ~~second~~fourth quarter of 2010, was primarily due to the recognition of additional income in the ~~second~~fourth quarter of ~~2010 associated with revenue adjustments.~~2010. The ~~increase~~decrease in equity income in the ~~third~~first quarter of ~~2010,~~2011, as compared to the ~~third~~first quarter of ~~2009,~~2010, was primarily due to an increase in ~~the profitability of~~ our ~~joint ventures.~~

~~For the nine months ended September 30, 2010, equity income was approximately $7 million as compared to $1 million~~reserves for ~~the same period in 2009. The increase was primarily related to the same factors as discussed above.~~uncollectible accounts and certain other revenue adjustments.

Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests. Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests was ~~$23.5~~$20.3 million for the ~~third~~first quarter of ~~2010,~~2011, as compared to ~~$16.0~~$23.4 million for the ~~second~~fourth quarter of 2010 and ~~$15.3~~$15.6 million for the ~~third~~first quarter of ~~2009.~~2010. The ~~increases~~decrease in net income attributable to noncontrolling interests in the ~~third~~first quarter of 2011 as compared to the fourth quarter of 2010 was primarily due to a decrease in earnings resulting from fewer treatment days in the first quarter of 2011. The increase in net income attributable to noncontrolling interests in the first quarter of 2011, as compared to ~~both~~ the ~~second~~first quarter of 2010, ~~and the third quarter of 2009 were~~was primarily due to an increase in the profitability of our joint ventures, as well as increases in the number of joint ventures.

Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests was $55.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010, as compared to $41.2 million for the same period in 2009. The increase in net income attributable to noncontrolling interests was primarily the result of the same factors as discussed above.

Our accounts receivable balances at ~~September 30, 2010~~March 31, 2011 and ~~June 30,~~December 31, 2010 were ~~$1,083~~$1,069 million and ~~$1,071~~$1,049 million, respectively, which represented approximately 6362 days and 6461 days of revenue, respectively, net of bad debt provision. The ~~decrease~~increase in DSO was primarily the result of ~~improved~~a slight slowdown in our cash collections. Our DSO calculation is based on the current quarter’s average revenue per day. There were no significant changes during the ~~third~~first quarter of ~~2010~~2011 from the ~~second~~fourth quarter of 2010 in the amount of unreserved accounts receivable over one year old or the amounts pending approval from third-party payors.

Outlook for ~~2010.~~2011 and 2012.We ~~are narrowing~~expect our operating income ~~guidance~~ for ~~2010~~2011 to be in the range of ~~$995~~$1,040 million to ~~$1,015 million. We are also revising~~$1,100 million and expect our operating cash ~~flow guidance~~flows for ~~2010. Our operating cash flow is now projected~~2011 to be in the range of ~~$800~~$840 million to ~~$875~~$940 million. ~~Our previous~~We also expect our operating ~~cash flow guidance~~income for ~~2010 was~~2012 to be in the range of ~~$725~~$1,100 million to ~~$825~~$1,200 million. The increase in our operating cash flow guidance was primarily due to reduced tax payments resulting from accelerated tax deductions. Because of the uncertainties of operating under the new Medicare bundled payment system and the ongoing uncertainties associated with our payor mix, we will not be providing a specific guidance range for 2011 operating income at this time. These projections and the underlying assumptions involve significant risks and uncertainties, and actual results may vary significantly from current projections. These risks, among others, include those relating to the concentration of profits generated from commercial ~~payors,~~payor plans, continued downward pressure on average realized payment rates from commercial payors, which may result in the loss of revenue or patients, a reduction in the number of patients under higher-paying commercial plans, a reduction in government payment rates or changes to the structure of payments under the Medicare ESRD program or other government-based programs, ~~including, for example, the implementation of a bundled payment rate system beginning January 2011 which will lower reimbursement for services we provide to Medicare patients, and~~ the impact of health care reform legislation that was enacted in the United States in March 2010, changes in pharmaceutical or anemia management practice

patterns, payment policies, or pharmaceutical pricing, our ability to maintain contracts with physician medical directors, legal compliance risks, including our continued compliance with complex government regulations, the resolution of ongoing investigations by various federal and state ~~government~~governmental agencies, ~~and~~ continued increased competition from large and medium sized dialysis providers that compete directly with us, our ability to complete any acquisitions, mergers or dispositions that we might be considering or announce, or integrate and successfully operate any business we may ~~acquire.~~acquire and expansion of our operations and services to markets outside the United States. See “Risk Factors” in Part II, Item 1A. in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and the cautionary language contained in the forward looking statements and associated risks as discussed under “Forward-looking statements” on page 23 for more information about these and other potential risks. We undertake no obligation to update or revise these projections, whether as a result of changes in underlying factors, new information, future events or otherwise.

Liquidity and capital resources.Cash flow from operations during the ~~third~~first quarter of ~~2010~~2011 was ~~$161~~$330 million, compared to ~~$167~~$262 million during the ~~third~~first quarter of ~~2009.~~2010. The ~~reduction~~increase in operating cash flow was primarily the result of improved cash earnings, the timing of payments for working capital ~~expenditures.~~expenditures and the timing of interest payments. Non-operating cash outflows for the ~~third~~first quarter of ~~2010~~2011 included capital asset expenditures of ~~$70~~$69 million, including ~~$23~~$28 million for new center developments and relocations and ~~$47~~$41 million for maintenance and information technology. We also spent an additional ~~$46~~$82 million for ~~acquisitions. We~~acquisitions and paid distributions to noncontrolling interests of ~~$24~~$22 million. ~~We also repurchased 1.4 million shares of our common stock for approximately $98.5 million of which $48.6 million was settled in cash.~~ Non-operating cash outflows for the ~~third~~first quarter of ~~2009~~2010 included capital asset expenditures of approximately ~~$67~~$45 million, including ~~$42~~$22 million for new center developments and relocations and $25 million for maintenance and information technology. We spent an additional $21 million for acquisitions. We also repurchased 1.1 million shares of our common stock for approximately $62.4 million in the third quarter of 2009 and paid distributions to noncontrolling interest of $17 million.

During the third quarter of 2010, we acquired 10 dialysis centers, opened 12 new dialysis centers, and closed seven centers. During the third quarter of 2009, we acquired four dialysis centers, opened 21 new dialysis centers, closed six centers and provided administrative and management services to one additional third-party owned center.

Cash flow from operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 was $719 million compared to $514 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009. The improved operating cash flow was primarily the result of improved cash earnings, collections of accounts receivable balances and the timing of certain other working capital expenditures. Non-operating cash outflows for the first nine months of 2010 included capital asset expenditures of $172 million, including $75 million for new center developments and relocations and $97$23 million for maintenance and information technology. We also spent an additional ~~$138~~$1.1 million for acquisitions. We paid distributions to noncontrolling interests of $61 million. We also repurchased 3.0 million shares of our common stock for approximately $198.5 million of which $148.7 million was settled in cash. Non-operating cash outflows for the first nine months of 2009 included capital asset expenditures of $206 million, including $127 million for new center developments and relocations and $79 million for maintenance and information technology. We also spent an additional $64 million for acquisitions. We also repurchased 1.9 million shares of our common stock for approximately $94.4 millionacquisitions and paid distributions to noncontrolling interests of ~~$47~~$19 million.

During the first ~~nine months~~quarter of ~~2009~~2011, we acquired and opened a total of 33 dialysis centers, sold ~~investments in mutual funds totaling $16.5 million.~~

~~For~~one center and closed two centers. During the ~~nine months ended September 30,~~first quarter of 2010, we acquired ~~34 dialysis centers,~~and opened ~~51 new~~a total of 22 dialysis centers, closed ~~13 centers and sold four centers. For the nine months ended September 30, 2009, we acquired 13 dialysis centers, opened 61 new dialysis centers, closed 13~~five centers, sold ~~five~~three centers, ~~purchased equity investments in six centers and~~ provided administrative and management services ~~for two~~to one additional third-party owned ~~centers.~~center and developed one center in which we own a minority equity investment.

We currently expect to spend approximately ~~$125~~$240 million for capital asset expenditures in ~~2010~~2011 related to routine maintenance items and information technology ~~equipment.~~equipment, which includes the capital expenditures for

our new corporate headquarters. We also expect to spend ~~$300~~$150 million for new

center development and relocations ~~and center acquisitions~~ in ~~2010, depending~~2011. These expenditures will depend upon the availability of projects and sufficient project ~~returns, which does not include any potential expenditures for our new corporate headquarters.~~

In July 2010, we announced that we will construct a new corporate headquarters in Denver, Colorado. In July 2010, we acquired the land and existing improvements for approximately $11 million and estimate that the total construction costs of the building will be approximately $90 million. Construction is expected to begin in early 2011, and is estimated to be complete in the second half of 2012.returns.

On ~~October 20, 2010,~~February 4, 2011, we entered into a ~~$3,000 million new Senior Secured Credit Agreement (the Credit Agreement)~~definitive agreement to acquire all of the outstanding equity securities of CDSI I Holding Company, Inc., ~~consisting~~parent company of a five year $250 million revolving line of credit, a five year $1,000 million Term Loan A and a six year $1,750 million Term Loan B. We also have the right to request an increase to the borrowing capacity to a total aggregate principal amount of not more than $4,000dialysis provider DSI Renal, Inc. (DSI), in cash for approximately $689.2 million, subject to ~~bank participation.~~among other things, adjustments for certain items such as working capital, the purchase of noncontrolling interests, capital assets and acquisitions expenditures. DSI currently operates approximately 106 outpatient dialysis centers serving approximately 8,000 patients. The ~~revolving line of credit and the Term Loan A will initially bear interest at LIBOR plus an interest rate margin of 2.75% which~~transaction is subject to ~~adjustment depending upon our leverage ratio and can range from 2.25%~~approval by the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) including Hart-Scott-Rodino antitrust clearance. We anticipate that we will be required by the FTC to ~~2.75%. The Term Loan A requires annual principal payments~~divest a certain number of $50 million in 2011, $50 million in 2012, $100 million in 2013, and $150 million in 2014, with the balance of $650 million due in 2015. The Term Loan B bears interest at LIBOR (floor of 1.50%) plus 3.00% subject tooutpatient dialysis centers as a ratings based step-down to 2.75%. The Term Loan B requires annual principal payments of $17.5 million in each year from 2011 through 2015 with the balance of $1,663 million due in 2016. The borrowings under the Credit Agreement are guaranteed by substantially all of our direct and indirect wholly-owned domestic subsidiaries and are secured by substantially all of DaVita’s and its guarantors’ assets. The Credit Agreement contains customary affirmative and negative covenants such as various restrictions on investments, acquisitions, the payment of dividends, redemptions and acquisitions of capital stock, capital expenditures and other indebtedness, as well as limitations on the amount of tangible net assets in non-guarantor subsidiaries. However, many of these restrictions will not apply as long as our leverage ratio is below 3.50:1.00. In addition, the Credit Agreement requires compliance with financial covenants including an interest coverage ratio and a leverage ratio that determines the interest rate margins as described above.

~~On October 20, 2010, we also issued $775 million aggregate principal amount of 6~~ ³/8~~% senior notes due 2018 and $775 million aggregate principal amount of 6~~ ⁵/8% senior notes due 2020 (the New Senior Notes). The New Senior Notes will pay interest on May 1 and November 1, of each year beginning May 1, 2011. The New Senior Notes are unsecured senior obligations and rank equally to other unsecured senior indebtedness. The Senior Notes are guaranteed by substantially all of our direct and indirect wholly-owned domestic subsidiaries. We may redeem some or allcondition of the 6 ³/8~~% senior notes at any time on or after November 1, 2013 at certain redemption prices and may redeem some or all of~~transaction. We currently expect the 6 ⁵/8~~% senior notes at any time on or after November 1, 2014 at certain redemption prices.~~

We received total proceeds of $4,300 million from these transactions, $2,750 million from the borrowings on Term Loan A and Term Loan B and an additional $1,550 million from the issuance of the Senior Notes. We used a portion of the proceedstransaction to pay-off the outstanding principal balances of our existing senior secured credit facilities plus accrued interest totaling $1,795 million and to purchase pursuant to a cash tender offer $558 million of the outstanding principal balances of our $700 million 6 ⁵/8~~% senior notes due 2013 and $731 million of the outstanding balances of our $850 million 7~~ ¹/4% senior subordinated notes due 2015 (the Existing Notes), plus accrued interest totaling $1,297 million. The total amount paid for the Existing Notes was $1,019.06 per $1,000 principal amount of the 6⁵/8~~% senior notes and $1,038.75 per $1,000 principal amount of the 7~~ ¹/4% senior subordinated notes. This resulted in us paying a cash tender premium of $39 million in order to extinguish this portion of the Existing Notes. On November 19, 2010, we will redeem the remaining outstanding balance of the existing 6 ⁵/8~~% senior notes of $142 million at 101.656% per $1,000 and the remaining outstanding balance of the existing 7~~ ¹/4% senior subordinated notes of $119 million at 103.625% per $1,000 plus accrued interest totaling $265 million. In addition, we will pay a call premium totaling $7 million. We also paid an additional $70 million in fees, discounts and other expenses. As a result of the above transactions, we received approximately $827 million in excess cash which we intend to use for general purposes and other opportunities, including share repurchases, potential acquisitions and other growth investments.

~~In connection with these transactions, we expect to expense one time refinancing charges ranging from $65 million to $75 million~~close in the ~~fourth~~third quarter of ~~2010, which includes the write off of existing deferred financing costs, the cash tender and call premiums, as described above and other expenses.~~

~~On June 7, 2010, we redeemed $200 million aggregate principal amount of our outstanding 6~~⁵/8% senior notes due 2013, at a price of 101.656% plus accrued interest. As a result of this transaction, we incurred pre-tax debt redemption charges of $4.1 million, which includes the call premium and the net write-off of other finance costs.2011.

During the first ~~nine months of 2010 we made mandatory principal payments totaling $65.6 million on the prior Term Loan A.~~

~~During the third~~ quarter of ~~2010,~~2011, we repurchased a total of ~~1,448,000~~162,300 shares of our common stock for ~~$98.5~~$13.6 million or an average price of ~~$68.02 per share. During the first nine months of 2010, we repurchased a total of 3,035,160 shares of our common stock for $198.5 million or an average price of $65.41~~$84.02 per share. As of ~~September 30, 2010, a total~~March 31, 2011, all of ~~$49.9 million of our~~these share repurchases ~~have~~had not yet been settled in cash. In addition, we also repurchased a total of ~~4,244,300~~969,100 shares of our common stock from ~~October~~April 1, ~~2010~~2011 through ~~October 22, 2010,~~April 30, 2011 for ~~$301.5~~$84.4 million, or an average price of ~~$71.03~~$87.08 per ~~share which completed~~share. As a result of these transactions, our ~~previous~~remaining board authorization for share ~~repurchases. On November 3, 2010, our Board~~repurchases as of ~~Directors authorized an additional $800~~April 30, 2011 is approximately $583.5 million.

During the first quarter of 2011 we made mandatory principal payments totaling $12.5 million on the Term Loan A and $4.4 million on the Term Loan B.

As of ~~share repurchases~~March 31, 2011, we maintained a total of ~~our common stock.~~

On July 22, 2010, we entered into a First Amended and Restated National Service Provider Agreement, or the Agreement, with NxStage Medical Inc., or NxStage. The Agreement supersedes the National Service Provider Agreement that we entered into with NxStage on February 7, 2007. Under terms of the Agreement, we will have the ability to continue to purchase NxStage System One hemodialysis machines and related supplies at discounted prices. In addition, under the Agreement, we may earn warrants to purchase NxStage common stock subject to certain requirements, including our ability to achieve certain System One home patient growth targets. The Agreement provides for a range of warrant amounts that may be earned annually depending upon the achievement of various home patient targets. The maximum amount of shares underlying warrants that we can earn over three years is 5.5 million. The exercise price of the warrants is $14.22 per share. In connection therewith, we entered into a Registration Rights Agreement whereby NxStage has agreed to register any shares issued to us under the warrants. The Agreement expires on June 30, 2013, and will be automatically extended on a monthly basis unless terminated by either party pursuant to the Agreement.

~~On September 30, 2010, our~~nine interest rate swap agreements ~~expired. The~~with amortizing notional amounts totaling $988 million. These agreements ~~that were effective during the third quarter of 2010,~~ had the economic effect of modifying the ~~LIBOR-based~~LIBOR variable component of our interest rate on an equivalent amount of our ~~debt~~Term Loan A to fixed rates ranging from ~~4.05%~~1.59% to ~~4.70%~~1.64%, resulting in an overall weighted average effective interest rate of ~~5.87% on the hedged portion of our Senior Secured Credit Facilities,~~4.36%, including the Term Loan BA margin of ~~1.50%~~2.75%. The swap agreements expire by September 30, 2014 and require monthly interest payments. During the three months ended March 31, 2011, we accrued net charges of $2.3 million from these swaps which are included in debt expense. As of March 31, 2011, the total fair value of these swap agreements was a liability of $0.9 million. We estimate that approximately $11.8 million of existing unrealized pre-tax losses in other comprehensive income at March 31, 2011 will be reclassified into income over the next twelve months.

As of March 31, 2011, we maintained five interest rate cap agreements with notional amounts totaling $1.25 billion. These agreements have the economic effect of capping the LIBOR variable component of our interest rate at a maximum of 4.00% on an equivalent amount of our Term Loan B debt. The cap agreements expire on September 30, ~~2010,~~2014. As of March 31, 2011, the total fair value of these cap agreements was an asset of $9.6 million. During the three months ended March 31, 2011, we recorded $1.8 million, net of tax, as a decrease to other comprehensive income due to unrealized valuation changes in the cap agreements, net of the amortization of the interest rate cap premiums that were reclassified into net income.

As of March 31, 2011, the interest rates were economically fixed on ~~approximately 46%~~primarily all of our total debt.

~~The~~As a result of the swap agreements, our overall weighted average effective interest rate on the Senior Secured Credit Facilities was ~~1.80%~~4.67%, based upon the current margins in effect of ~~1.50%,~~2.75% for the Term Loan A and 3.00% for the Term Loan B, as of ~~September 30, 2010.~~March 31, 2011.

~~The~~Our overall weighted average effective interest rate during the ~~third~~first quarter of ~~2010~~2011 was ~~4.45%~~5.20% and as of ~~September 30, 2010~~March 31, 2011 was ~~4.18%~~5.34%.

As of ~~September 30, 2010,~~March 31, 2011, we had undrawn revolving credit facilities totaling $250 million of which approximately ~~$52~~$46 million was committed for outstanding letters of credit.

We believe that we will have sufficient liquidity and will generate significant operating cash flows to fund our scheduled debt service and other obligations for the foreseeable future, including the next 12 months, under the terms of our ~~new~~ debt agreements. Our primary sources of liquidity are cash from operations and cash from borrowings.

Stock-based compensation recognized in a period represents the amortization during that period of the estimated grant-date fair value of current and prior stock-based awards over their vesting terms, adjusted for expected forfeitures. Shares issued upon exercise of stock awards are generally issued from shares in treasury. We have used the Black-Scholes-Merton valuation model for estimating the grant-date fair value of stock options and stock-settled stock appreciation rights granted in all periods. During the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September 30, 2010,~~March 31, 2011, we granted ~~1.9~~0.9 million stock-settled stock appreciation rights with a grant-date fair value of ~~$30.6~~$19.9 million and a weighted-average expected life of approximately ~~3.5~~4.2 years, and also granted ~~0.5 million~~six thousand stock units with a grant-date fair value of ~~$29.3~~$0.5 million and a weighted-average expected life of approximately ~~2.5~~2.0 years.

For the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2011 and 2010, ~~and 2009,~~ we recognized ~~$33.5~~$9.7 million and ~~$33.9~~$10.2 million, respectively, in stock-based compensation expense for ~~stock options,~~ stock-settled stock appreciation rights, stock options, stock units and discounted employee stock plan purchases, which are primarily included in general and administrative expenses. The estimated tax ~~benefit~~benefits recorded for stock-based compensation through ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2011 and 2010 ~~and 2009~~ was ~~$12.7~~$3.7 million and ~~$12.8~~$3.9 million, respectively. As of ~~September 30, 2010,~~March 31, 2011, there was ~~$93.4~~$86.7 million of total estimated unrecognized compensation cost related to nonvested stock-based compensation arrangements under our equity compensation and stock purchase plans. We expect to recognize this cost over a weighted average remaining period of 1.5 years.

During the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2011 and 2010, ~~and 2009,~~ we received ~~$36.8~~$2.2 million and ~~$27.3~~$20.1 million, respectively, in cash proceeds from stock option exercises and ~~$15.8~~$13.9 million and ~~$12.4~~$7.9 million, respectively, in actual tax benefits upon the exercise of stock awards.

On January 1, 2011 we implemented Medicare’s new payment system in which all ESRD payments are made under a single bundled payment rate that, beginning in 2012, provides for an annual inflation adjustment based upon a market basket index, less a productivity adjustment. Also beginning in 2012, the rule provides for up to a 2% annual payment withhold that can be earned back by the facilities that meet certain defined clinical performance standards. The new payment system reimburses providers based upon a single bundled or average payment for each Medicare treatment provided. This new bundled payment amount is designed to cover all dialysis services which were historically included in the composite rate and all separately billable ESRD services such as pharmaceuticals and laboratory costs. The new bundled payment rate is adjusted for certain patient characteristics, a geographic wage index and certain other factors. The initial 2011 bundled payment rate included reductions of 2.0% and 3.1%, respectively, to conform to the provisions of MIPPA and to establish budget neutrality. Further, there is a 5.94% reduction tied to an expanded list of case mix adjustors which can be earned back based upon the presence of these patient characteristics and co-modalities at the time of treatment.

On April 1, 2011, CMS released an interim final rule correcting the 3.1% transition adjustment factor to properly update the number of ESRD facilities that elected to opt fully into the new Prospective Payment System (PPS). This new rule is prospective and as a result, effective April 1, 2011 we began recognizing revenues in accordance with the new rule, which will result in an increase in Medicare revenue per treatment of approximately 3.1% in comparison to our levels recorded in the first quarter of 2011. This will reduce our transition adjustment to zero for the balance of 2011 and to an aggregate of approximately 0.75% for 2011.

In addition to the debt obligations reflected on our balance sheet, we have commitments associated with operating leases and letters of credit, as well as potential obligations associated with our equity investments in nonconsolidated businesses and to dialysis centers that are wholly-owned by third parties. Substantially all of our facilities are leased. We have potential acquisition obligations for several joint ventures and for some of our non-wholly-owned subsidiaries in the form of put provisions. If these put provisions were exercised, we would be required to purchase the third-party owners’ noncontrolling interests at either the appraised fair market value or a predetermined multiple of earnings or cash flow attributable to the noncontrolling interests put to us, which is intended to approximate fair value. The methodology we use to estimate the fair values of noncontrolling interests subject to put provisions assumes either the higher of a liquidation value of net assets or an average multiple of earnings, based on historical earnings, patient mix and other performance indicators, as well as other factors. During the second quarter of 2010, we refined the methodology used to estimate the fair value of noncontrolling interests subject to put provisions by eliminating an annual inflation factor that was previously applied to the put provisions until they became exercisable. We believe that eliminating an annual inflation factor will result in a better representation of the estimated actual fair value of the noncontrolling interests subject to put provisions as of the reporting date. The estimated fair values of the noncontrolling interests subject to put provisions is a critical accounting estimate that involves significant judgments and assumptions and may not be indicative of the actual values at which the noncontrolling interests may ultimately be settled, which could vary significantly from our current estimates. The estimated fair values of noncontrolling interests subject to put provisions can fluctuate and the implicit multiple of earnings at which these noncontrolling interests obligations may be settled will vary significantly depending upon market conditions including potential purchasers’ access to the capital markets, which can impact the level of competition for dialysis and non-dialysis related businesses, the economic performance of these businesses and the restricted marketability of the third-party owners’ noncontrolling interests. The amount of noncontrolling interests subject to put provisions that contractually employ a predetermined multiple of earnings rather than fair value are immaterial. For additional information see Note 8 to the condensed consolidated financial statements.

We also have certain potential ~~cash~~ commitments to provide operating capital ~~advances as needed~~ to several dialysis centers that are wholly-owned by third parties or centers in which we own ana minority equity investment as well as to physician–owned vascular access clinics that we operate under management and administrative services agreements.

The following is a summary of these contractual obligations and commitments as of ~~September 30, 2010, reflecting~~March 31, 2011 (in millions):

The pay-fixed swap obligations represent the estimated fair market values of our interest rate swap agreements as reported by various broker dealers that ~~have occurred with our debt instruments from December~~are based upon relevant observable market inputs as well as other current market conditions that existed as of March 31, ~~2009 (in millions). This excludes~~2011, and represent the ~~impact~~estimated potential obligation that we would be required to pay based upon the estimated future settlement of each specific tranche over the term of the ~~debt refinancing transactions that occurred on October 20, 2010.~~

~~Not included above are interest payments related to our Senior Secured Credit Facilities. Our Senior Secured Credit Facilities as of September 30, 2010 bear interest at LIBOR plus margins of 1.50%.~~swap agreements, assuming no future changes in the forward yield curve. The interest rates on our Term Loan A and the revolving line of credit are adjustable depending upon our achievement of certain financial ratios. At September 30, 2010, our Senior Secured Credit Facilities had an overall weighted average effective interest rate of 1.80%, including the effectsactual amount of our ~~swap agreements. Interest payments are due at~~obligation associated with these swaps in the ~~maturity of specific debt tranches within each term loan, which can range in maturity from one month to twelve months. Future interest payments~~future will depend upon ~~the amount of mandatory principal payments and principal prepayments,~~ changes in the LIBOR-based interest rates that can fluctuate significantly depending upon market conditions, and other relevant factors that can affect the ~~mix~~fair market value of the debt tranche maturities, as well as changes in the interest rate margins. Assuming no principal prepayments on our Senior Secured Credit Facilities during the next year and no changes in the effective interest rates, we would pay approximately $32 million of interest over the next twelve months.these swap agreements.

In addition to the above commitments, we are obligated to purchase a certain amount of our hemodialysis products and supplies at fixed prices through 2015 from Gambro Renal Products, Inc.~~, or Gambro Renal Products,~~ in connection with anthe Alliance and Product Supply Agreement. Our total expenditures for the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September 30, 2010~~March 31, 2011 on such products ~~with Gambro Renal Products~~ were approximately 2% of our total operating ~~costs.~~costs in each year. In January 2010, we entered into an agreement with Fresenius Medical Care, or Fresenius, which committed us to purchase a certain amount of dialysis equipment, parts and supplies from them through 2013. Our total expenditures for the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September 30, 2010~~March 31, 2011 on such products ~~with Fresenius~~ were approximately 2% of our total operating costs.

The actual amount of purchases in future years from Gambro Renal Products and Fresenius will depend upon a number of factors, including the operating requirements of our ~~existing~~ centers, the number of ~~new~~ centers we acquire, ~~and build,~~ growth ~~within~~of our existing centers, and in the case of the Alliance and Product Supply Agreement, Gambro Renal Products’ ability to meet our needs.

The settlements of approximately ~~$15~~$12 million of existing income tax liabilities for unrecognized tax benefits are excluded from the above table as reasonably reliable estimates of the timing cannot be made.

Effective December 15, 2009, FASB amended certain fair value disclosure requirements to include additional disclosures related to significant transfers in and out of the various fair value hierarchy levels and to clarify existing disclosures by providing disaggregate levels for each class of assets and liabilities. We are also required to provide additional disclosures on the valuation techniques and inputs used to measure fair value, as well as changes to the valuation techniques and inputs, for both recurring and nonrecurring assets and liabilities carried at fair value. In addition, we are also required to disclose the reason for making changes to our valuation techniques, assumptions and or other unobservable market inputs. Certain other disclosures on reporting the gross activity rather than the net activity for Level 3 fair value measurements is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 31, 2010. See Note 8 to the condensed consolidated financial statements for further discussion.

Effective January 1, 2010, the FASB eliminated the quantitative approach previously required for determining the primary beneficiary of a variable interest entity, and required additional disclosures about an enterprise’s involvement in variable interest entities. An entity is required to perform an analysis to determine whether the enterprise’s variable interest or interests give it a controlling financial interest in a variable interest entity by having both the power to direct the activities of a variable interest entity that most significantly impact the entity’s economic performance and the obligation to absorb losses of the entity, or the right to receive benefits from the entity. In addition, the FASB established new guidance for determining whether an entity is a variable interest entity, requiring an ongoing reassessment of whether an enterprise is the primary beneficiary of a variable interest entity, and adding an additional reconsideration event for determining whether an entity is a variable interest entity when any changes in facts and circumstances occur such that the holders of the equity investment at risk, as a group, lose the power from voting rights or similar rights of those investments to direct the activities of the entity that most significantly impact the entity’s economic performance. See Note 12 to the condensed consolidated financial statements for the impact of adopting these new requirements.

The ~~table~~tables below ~~provides~~provide information about our financial instruments that are sensitive to changes in interest rates. For our debt obligations the table presents principal repayments and current weighted average interest rates on our debt obligations as of ~~September~~March 31, 2011. The variable rates presented reflect the weighted average LIBOR rates in effect for all debt tranches plus interest rate margins in effect as of March 31, 2011. The Term Loan A margin currently in effect is 2.75% until June 30, ~~2010. This excludes~~2011, and along with the ~~impact~~revolving line of ~~the debt refinancing transactions that occurred on October 20, 2010.~~credit, is then subject to adjustment depending upon changes in certain of our financial ratios including a leverage ratio. The Term Loan B currently bears interest at LIBOR (floor of 1.50%) plus an interest rate margin of 3.00% subject to a ratings based step-down to 2.75%.


	Expected maturity date												Thereafter		Total		Average interest rate				Fair value
	2010		2011		2012		2013		2014		2015				Total		Average interest rate			Expected maturity date													Thereafter			Total			Average interest rate				Fair value
	(dollars in millions)												Thereafter								Fair value					2011		2012		2013		2014	Thereafter			Total			Average interest rate			2015				2016
Long term debt:																																											Fair value
Fixed rate	$	1	$	1	$	1	$	702	$	1	$	851	$	4	$	1,561		6.92	%		$	1,601	$	15	$	19	$	19	$	18	$	18		$	1,663		$	1,556		$	3,308			5.60	%	$	3,325
Variable rate	$	28	$	66	$	1,706	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	1,800		1.80	%		$	1,791	$	43	$	50	$	100	$	150	$	650		$	—		$	—		$	993			4.46	%	$	995

Our Senior Secured Credit Facilities, which include the Term Loan A and the Term Loan B, consist of various individual tranches that can range in maturity from one month to twelve months ~~and~~(currently monthly). For the Term Loan A each specific tranche ~~bears~~would bear interest at a LIBOR rate that is determined by the maturity of that specific ~~tranche. LIBOR-based~~tranche plus an interest ~~rates are~~rate margin. The LIBOR variable component of the interest rate is reset as each specific tranche matures and a new tranche is re-established and can fluctuate significantly depending upon market conditions including the credit and capital markets. ~~Any increase~~Our Term Loan B is currently effectively fixed since the LIBOR variable component of our interest rate is set at a LIBOR floor of 1.50%. We have included it in the fixed rate totals in the table above until such time as the LIBOR-based component of our interest rate exceeds 1.50%. We will then be subject to LIBOR-based interest ~~rates~~rate volatility on the ~~unhedged portion~~LIBOR variable component of our ~~Senior Secured Credit Facilities, which totaled approximately $1.8~~interest rate, but only up to 4.00% on $1.25 billion of outstanding principal debt on the Term Loan B, as described below. The remaining $500 million of ~~September 30, 2010, will have~~outstanding debt on the Term Loan B is subject to LIBOR-based interest rate volatility above a ~~negative impact on our overall earnings.~~floor of 1.50%.

As of ~~September 30, 2010, our~~March 31, 2011, we maintained a total of nine interest rate swap agreements ~~expired. The~~with amortizing notional amounts totaling $988 million. These agreements ~~that were effective during the third quarter of 2010~~ had the economic effect of modifying the ~~LIBOR-based~~LIBOR variable component of our interest rate on an equivalent amount of our ~~debt~~Term Loan A to fixed rates ranging from ~~4.05%~~1.59% to ~~4.70%~~1.64%, resulting in an overall weighted average effective interest rate of ~~5.87% on the hedged portion of our Senior Secured Credit Facilities,~~4.36%, including the Term Loan BA margin of ~~1.50%~~2.75%. The swap agreements expire by September 30, 2014 and require monthly interest payments. During the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September 30, 2010,~~March 31, 2011, we accrued net charges of ~~$9.1~~$2.3 million from these swaps which isare included in debt expense. As of March 31, 2011, the total fair value of these swap agreements was a liability of $0.9 million. We estimate that approximately $11.8 million of existing unrealized pre-tax losses in other comprehensive income at March 31, 2011 will be reclassified into income over the next twelve months.

During the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September 30, 2010~~March 31, 2011, we recorded ~~$5.4~~$1.8 million, net of tax, as ~~an increase~~a decrease to other comprehensive income ~~for previous losses~~due to unrealized valuation changes in the cap agreements, net of the amortization of the interest rate cap premiums that were reclassified into net ~~income, net of valuation losses.~~income.

As of ~~September 30, 2010,~~March 31, 2011, the interest rates were economically fixed on ~~approximately 46%~~primarily all of our total debt.

~~The~~As a result of the swap agreements, the overall weighted average effective interest rate on the Senior Secured Credit Facilities was ~~1.80%~~4.67%, based upon the current margins in effect of ~~1.50%,~~2.75% for the Term Loan A and 3.00% for the Term Loan B, as of ~~September 30, 2010.~~March 31, 2011.

The overall weighted average effective interest rate during the ~~third~~first quarter of ~~2010~~2011 was ~~4.45%~~5.20% and as of ~~September 30, 2010~~March 31, 2011 was ~~4.18%~~5.34%.

Management has established and maintains disclosure controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports that it files or submits pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or Exchange Act, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to the Company’s management, including its Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow for timely decisions regarding required disclosures.

At the end of the period covered by this report, we carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures in accordance with the Exchange Act requirements. Based upon that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded

that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures are effective for timely identification and review of material information required to be included in the Company’s Exchange Act reports, including this report on Form 10-Q. Management recognizes that these controls and procedures can provide only reasonable assurance of desired outcomes, and that estimates and judgments are still inherent in the process of maintaining effective controls and procedures.

There has not been any change in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting that was identified during the evaluation that occurred during the fiscal quarter covered by this report on Form 10-Q that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

The information in Note 5 of the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements in Part I, Item 1 of this report is incorporated by this reference in response to this item.

A restated description of the risk factors associated with our business is set forth below. This description includes any material changes to and supersedes the description of the risk factors associated with our business previously disclosed in Part I, Item 1A of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, ~~2009, and to the extent updated for any material changes since then, such risk factors previously disclosed in Part I Item 1A of our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30,~~ 2010. The risks discussed below are not the only ones facing our business. Please read the cautionary notice regarding forward-looking statements under the heading “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations”.

If the average rates that commercial payors pay us decline significantly, it would have a material adverse effect on our revenues, earnings and cash flows.

Approximately 34% of our dialysis and related lab services revenues for the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September 30, 2010~~March 31, 2011 were generated from patients who have commercial payors as the primary payor. The majority of these patients have insurance policies that pay us on terms and at rates that are generally significantly higher than Medicare rates. The payments we receive from commercial payors generate nearly all of our profit and all of our nonacute dialysis profits come from commercial payors. We continue to experience downward pressure on some of our commercial payment rates and it is possible that commercial payment rates could be materially lower in the future. The downward pressure on commercial payment rates is a result of general conditions in the market, recent and future consolidations among commercial payors, increased focus on dialysis services and other factors.

We are continuously in the process of negotiating our existing or potentially new agreements with commercial payors who tend to be aggressive in their negotiations with us. Sometimes many significant agreements are up for renewal or being renegotiated at the same time. In the event that our continual negotiations result in overall commercial rate reductions in excess of overall commercial rate increases, the cumulative effect could have a material adverse effect on our financial results. Consolidations have significantly increased the negotiating leverage of commercial payors. Our negotiations with payors are also influenced by competitive pressures. We expect that some of our contracted rates with commercial payors may decrease or that we may experience decreases in patient volume as our negotiations with commercial payors continue. In addition to increasing downward pressure on contracted commercial payor rates, payors have been attempting to impose restrictions and limitations on non-contracted or out-of-network providers. In some circumstances for some commercial payors, our centers are designated as out-of-network providers. Rates for out-of-network providers are on average higher than rates for in-network providers. We believe commercial payors have or will begin to restructure their benefits to create disincentives for patients to select or remain with out-of-network providers and to decrease payment rates for out-of-network providers. Decreases in out-of-network rates and restrictions on out-of-network access combined with decreases in contracted rates could result in a significant decrease in our overall revenue derived from commercial payors. If the average rates that commercial payors pay us decline significantly, it would have a material adverse effect on our revenues, earnings and cash flows.

If the number of patients with higher-paying commercial insurance declines, then our revenues, earnings and cash flows would be substantially reduced.

Our revenue levels are sensitive to the percentage of our patients with higher-paying commercial insurance coverage. A patient’s insurance coverage may change for a number of reasons, including changes in the patient’s

or a family member’s employment status. Currently, for a patient covered by an employer group health plan,

Medicare generally becomes the primary payor after 33 months, or earlier, if the patient’s employer group health plan coverage terminates. When Medicare becomes the primary payor, the payment rate we receive for that patient shifts from the employer group health plan rate to the lower Medicare payment rate. We have seen an increase in the number of patients who have government-based programs as their primary payors which we believe is largely as a result of improved mortality and ~~the current~~recent economic ~~recession~~conditions which ~~has~~have a negative impact on the percentage of patients covered under commercial insurance plans. To the extent there are sustained or increased job losses in the United States, ~~as a result~~independent of ~~current~~whether general economic conditions might be improving, we could experience a continued decrease in the number of patients under commercial plans. We could also experience a further decrease if changes to the healthcare regulatory system result in fewer patients covered under commercial ~~plans.~~plans or an increase of patients covered under more restrictive commercial plans with lower reimbursement rates. In addition, our continuous process of negotiations with commercial payors under existing or potentially new agreements could result in a decrease in the number of patients under commercial plans to the extent that we cannot reach agreement with commercial payors on rates and other terms, resulting in termination or non-renewals of existing agreements or our inability to enter into new ones. If there is a significant reduction in the number of patients under higher-paying commercial plans relative to government-based programs that pay at lower rates, it would have a material adverse effect on our revenues, earnings and cash flows.

Changes in the structure of, and payment rates under the Medicare ESRD program, including the implementation of a bundled payment system under MIPPA and other healthcare reform initiatives, could substantially reduce our revenues, earnings and cash flows.

Approximately 49% of our dialysis and related lab services revenues for the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September 30, 2010~~March 31, 2011 was generated from patients who have Medicare as their primary payor. ~~Currently,~~Prior to January 1, 2011, the Medicare ESRD program ~~pays~~paid us for dialysis treatment services at a fixed composite rate. The Medicare composite rate iswas the payment rate for a dialysis treatment including the supplies used in those treatments, specified laboratory tests and certain pharmaceuticals. Certain other pharmaceuticals, including EPO, vitamin D analogs and iron supplements, as well as certain specialized laboratory tests, ~~are~~were separately billed.

In July 2008, MIPPA was passed by Congress. This legislation introduced a new payment system for dialysis services beginning in January 2011 whereby ~~ESRD payments will be~~payment for dialysis treatment and related services are now made under a bundled payment rate which ~~will provide for~~provides a fixed rate ~~for~~to encompass all goods and services provided during the dialysis treatment, including pharmaceuticals that were historically separately reimbursed to the dialysis providers, such as EPO, vitamin D analogs and iron supplements, ~~as well as certain specialized~~and laboratory ~~tests.~~testing. On ~~July 23, 2010, CMS released the final rule regarding the new bundled payment rate system and on~~ August 12, 2010, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, or CMS, published the final rule ~~was published~~implementing the bundled payment in the Federal Register. ~~We are still evaluating the various components of the new bundled payment rate system, however, we noted that the~~The initial 2011 bundled rate includes reductions of 2% and 3.1% to conform to the provisions of MIPPA and to establish budget neutrality, respectively. Further there is a 5.94% reduction tied to an expanded list of case mix adjustors which can be earned back based upon the presence of these certain patient characteristics and co-morbidities at the time of treatment. There are also other provisions which may impact payment including an outlier pool and a low volume facility adjustment. ~~Historically these services were separately billable~~

While we will continue to evaluate and ~~accounted for approximately 30%~~respond to the various components of ~~our total dialysis~~the new bundled payment rate system and ~~related lab services for~~ the ~~year ended December 31, 2009; now~~potential operational, clinical and economic impact it might have on us, the ~~dialysis facility will be at risk for utilization~~new payment system presents additional risks. For example, with ~~reimbursement set at a fixed rate.~~

~~With~~ regard to the expanded list of case-mix adjustors, there is a risk that our dialysis ~~clinics~~centers or billing and other systems may not accurately document and track the appropriate ~~adjustments,~~patient-specific characteristics, resulting in a reduction or overpayment in the amounts of the payments that we would otherwise be entitled to receive. The ~~rule also requires the~~ new single bundled payment base rate towill also be adjusted annually for inflation based upon a market basket index, less a productivity adjustment, beginning in 2012. Also, beginning in 2012, the rule provides for up to a 2% annual payment withhold that can be earned back by facilities that meet certain defined clinical performance standards; however, to the extent our facilities ~~that~~ do not fully meet the established benchmarks, ~~will~~we may not earn back all (or any) of the dollars withheld.

Dialysis providers ~~have~~were given the option to make a one-time election by November 1, 2010 to move fully to the bundled payment system in 2011 or to phase in the payment system over four years, in each case commencing on January 1, 2011. We ~~have~~ elected to move fully to the bundled payment system.

~~Because~~On April 1, 2011, CMS released an interim final rule correcting the 3.1% transition adjustment factor to properly update the number of ESRD facilities that elected to opt fully into the new Prospective Payment System (PPS). This new rule is prospective and will not be retroactively applied to first quarter revenues previously recognized under the bundle. As a result, effective April 1, 2011, we ~~are still~~began recognizing revenues in accordance with the new rule, which will result in an increase in Medicare revenue per treatment of approximately 3.1% in comparison to levels recorded in the ~~early stages~~first quarter of ~~evaluating the various factors that could potentially affect the adjustments that~~2011. This will ~~apply to our payments we cannot predict whether we will be able to~~also reduce our ~~operating costs~~transition adjustment rate to ~~a level~~zero for the balance of 2011 and to an aggregate of approximately 0.75% for the full year. The new rule, however, did not change the CMS methodology for determining the transition budget-neutrality adjustment. Although CMS did not provide us with their detailed calculation of the transition adjustment correction, we estimate that the 2012 transition adjustment will ~~offset any reduction~~go down to approximately 0.49% from the 2011 annualized adjustment amount of approximately 0.75%. Thereafter, we would expect the adjustment to be approximately 0.25% in ~~overall reimbursement for services we provide~~2013 and 0.00% in 2014.

We expect to ~~Medicare patients. In addition, we experience~~continue experiencing increases in operating costs that are subject to inflation, such as labor and supply costs, regardless of whether there is a compensating inflation-based increase in Medicare payment rates or in payments under the new bundled payment rate system. To the extent the Medicare bundled rates are established at levels that result in lower overall reimbursement for services we provide to Medicare patients, it could have a material adverse effect on our revenues, earnings and cash flows. We also cannot predict ~~whether we will be able to implement the requirements of the final rule within the time frames set forth in the new rule or~~ whether we will be able to satisfy our Medicare and Medicaid regulatory compliance obligations as processes and systems are modified substantially to comply with the rule. ~~In addition,~~To the extent we are not able to adequately bill and collect for certain payment adjustors and are not able to offset the mandated reductions in reimbursement or if we ~~are unable~~face regulatory enforcement actions and penalties as a result of alleged improper billing of governmental programs, it could have a material adverse effect on our revenues, earnings and cash flows. (For additional details regarding the risks we face for failing to ~~adequately modify~~adhere to our ~~processes~~Medicare and ~~systems prior~~Medicaid regulatory compliance obligations, see the risk factor below under the heading “If we fail to ~~implementation~~adhere to all of the ~~new requirements,~~complex government regulations that apply to our business, we ~~may experience significant delays in~~could suffer severe consequences that would substantially reduce our ~~ability to bill for services provided to Medicare patients which~~revenues, earnings and cash flows”).

Health care reform could ~~adversely affect~~substantially reduce our revenues, earnings and cash flows.

In March 2010, ~~healthcare~~broad health care reform legislation was enacted in the United States. Although many of the provisions of the new legislation do not take effect immediately, and may be modified before they are implemented, the reforms could have an impact on our ~~business.~~business in a number of ways. We cannot predict how employers, private payors or persons buying insurance might react to these changes or what form many of these regulations will take before implementation. However, we believe the establishment of ~~healthcare~~health care insurance exchanges under the legislation due to be operating by 2014 that will provide a marketplace for eligible individuals to purchase ~~healthcare~~health care insurance could result in a reduction in patients covered by commercial ~~insurance.~~insurance or an increase of patients covered under more restrictive commercial plans with lower reimbursement rates. To the extent that any modifications to the current ~~healthcare~~health care regulatory system result in a reduction in patients covered by commercial insurance or a reduction in reimbursement rates for our services from commercial and/or government payors, our revenues, earnings and cash flows could be adversely affected.

In addition, the health care reform legislation introduced severe penalties for the knowing and improper retention of overpayments collected from government payors. As a result, we have made significant investments in additional resources to accelerate the time it takes to identify and process overpayments and we may be required to make additional investments in the future. Acceleration in our ability to identify and process overpayments could result in us refunding overpayments to government or other payors sooner than we have in the past, which could have a material adverse effect on our operating cash flows. The failure to return identified overpayments within the specified time frame is now a violation of the federal False Claims Act.

The legislation also reduced the timeline to file Medicare claims, which now must be filed with the government within one calendar year after the date of service. To comply with this reduced timeline, we must deploy significant resources and may change our claims processing methods to ensure that our Medicare claims are filed in a timely fashion. Failure to file a claim within the one year window could result in payment denials, adversely affecting our revenues, earnings and cash flows.

Effective March 2011, CMS instituted new screening procedures and a new $500 enrollment fee for providers enrolling in government health care programs. A provider is subject to screening upon initial enrollment and each time the provider re-validates its enrollment application. Screening includes verification of enrollment information and review of various federal databases to ensure the provider has valid tax identification, NPI numbers and is not excluded. We expect this screening process to delay the Medicare contractor approval process, potentially causing a delay in reimbursement. The enrollment fee is also applicable upon initial enrollment, re-validation, and each time an existing provider adds a new facility location. This fee is an additional expense that must be paid for each center every three years and could be more significant if other government and commercial payors follow this trend. Ultimately, we anticipate the new screening and enrollment requirements will require additional personnel and financial resources and will potentially delay the enrollment and revalidation of our centers which in turn will delay payment.

Other reform measures allow CMS to place a moratorium on new enrollment of providers and to suspend payment to providers upon a credible allegation of fraud from any source. These types of reform measures, depending upon the scope and breadth of the implementing regulations, could adversely impact our revenues, earnings and cash flows.

Changes in state Medicaid or other non-Medicare government-based programs or payment rates could reduce our revenues, earnings and cash flows.

Approximately 17% of our dialysis and related lab services revenues for the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September 30, 2010,~~March 31, 2011 was generated from patients who have state Medicaid or other non-Medicare government-based programs, such as Medicare-assigned plans or the Veterans Health Administration (VA), as their primary coverage. As state governments and governmental organizations face increasing budgetary pressure, ~~they~~we may ~~propose~~in turn face reductions in payment rates, delays in the timing of payments, limitations on eligibility or other changes to ~~their related~~the applicable programs. For example, some programs, such as certain state Medicaid programs and the Veterans Health Administration, have recently considered, proposed or implemented rate reductions. In January 2009, the Department of Veterans Affairs informally adopted a policy to reduce payment rates for dialysis services to Medicare rates. The informal policy was subsequently withdrawn in July 2009.

On ~~February~~December 17, 2010, the Department of Veterans Affairs ~~formally proposed~~published a final rule in which ~~would~~it materially ~~reduce their~~changed the payment ~~rates~~methodology and ultimately the amount paid for dialysis services furnished to veterans in non-VA centers such as ours. In the final rule, the VA adopted the bundled payment system implemented by Medicare and estimated a reduction of 39% in payments for dialysis services to ~~equal Medicare rates. We cannot predict when or if~~veterans at non-VA centers. Approximately 2% of our dialysis and related lab services revenues for the ~~final rule will be effective or what will be included in~~three months ended March 31, 2011 was generated by the ~~final rule. If the proposed rule is implemented in its current form, it~~VA. The new VA payment methodology will have a significant negative impact on our revenues, earnings and cash flows as a result of the reduction in rates or as a result of athe decrease in the number of VA patients ~~covered by the Veterans Health Administration that~~ we ~~service. In addition, we~~serve. We recently executed ~~additional~~multi-year contractual agreements with the Veterans Health Administration ~~that have reduced~~and there is some ~~of our rates, and although~~uncertainty as to when this rule will take effect for the patients covered by these ~~are multi-year~~contracts. While at this time the contracts remain in force, these agreements provide for the right for either ~~side has the option~~party to terminate ~~any of~~ the ~~agreements~~agreement without cause on short notice. Further, patients who are not covered by the contractual arrangements will likely be reimbursed at Medicare rates beginning with the date of implementation of the rule. If the Veterans Health Administration proceeds with ~~further~~payment rate reductions or fails to ~~payments rates~~renew our existing contracts, we might have to cease accepting patients under this program and could even be forced to close centers. Approximately 2% of our dialysis and related lab services revenues for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 was generated by the Veterans Health Administration. While we cannot predict whether the Department of Veterans Affairs or any other government programs will be successful in reducing their payment rates or the timing of potential reductions, or if they might terminate any of our existing agreements with them on short notice, any such reduction or termination could have a material adverse effect on our revenues, earnings and cash flows.

In addition, some state Medicaid program eligibility requirements mandate that citizen enrollees in such programs provide documented proof of citizenship. If our patients cannot meet these proof of citizenship documentation requirements, they may be denied coverage under these programs. If state Medicaid or other

non-Medicare government programs reduce the rates paid by these programs for dialysis and related services, delay the timing of payment for services provided, further limit eligibility for coverage or adopt changes to their payment structure which reduces our overall payments from these state Medicaid or non-Medicare government programs, then our revenues, earnings and cash flows could be adversely affected.

Changes in clinical practices, payment rates or regulations impacting EPO and other pharmaceuticals could ~~substantially~~ reduce our revenues, earnings and cash flows.

The administration of EPO and other pharmaceuticals that are separately billable accounted for approximately ~~26%~~7% of our dialysis and related lab services revenues for the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September 30, 2010,~~March 31, 2011, with EPO alone accounting for approximately ~~19%~~5% of our dialysis and related lab services revenues for the same period. Changes in clinical practices that result in further decreased utilization of prescribed pharmaceuticals or changes in payment rates for those pharmaceuticals could ~~substantially~~ reduce our revenues, earnings and cash flows.

Since late 2006, there has been significant media discussion and government scrutiny regarding anemia management practices in the United States which has created confusion and concern in the nephrology community. In late 2006, the U.S. House of Representatives Ways and Means Committee held a hearing on the issue of the utilization of ~~erythropoeisis stimulating agents, or~~ ESAs, which include EPO, and in 2007, the FDA required changes to the labeling of EPO and ~~darbepoetin alfa, or~~ Aranesp^® to include a black box warning, the FDA’s strongest form of warning label. An FDA advisory panel on ESA use met in October 2010, which meeting was similar to the prior meeting held in 2007 in that there was significant discussion and concern about the safety of ESAs. The panel concluded it would not recommend a change in ESA labeling. However, the FDA is not bound by the panel’s recommendation. In addition, in June 2010, CMS opened a National Coverage Analysis (NCA) for ESAs. Further in ~~October 2010,~~January 2011, CMS ~~announced its plan to convene~~convened a meeting of the Medicare Evidence Development and Coverage Advisory Committee (MEDCAC) ~~in January 2011,~~ to ~~discuss~~evaluate evidence for the pending NCA. CMS ~~expects~~expected to complete its decision memo in March 2011 and expects to issue final guidance in June 2011.

The forgoing congressional and agency ~~hearings, votes~~activities and ~~meetings~~related actions could result in further restrictions on the utilization and reimbursement for ~~ESAs which could result in decreased EPO utilization.~~ESAs. Commercial payors have also increasingly examined their administration policies for EPO and, in some cases, have modified those policies. Inclusion of EPO in the Medicare bundled payment rate, ~~may~~as well as in a bundled payment rate for several of our commercial payors, is expected to mitigate the effect of lower utilization of EPO. However, further changes in labeling of EPO and other pharmaceuticals in a manner that alters physician practice patterns or accepted clinical practices, changes in private and governmental payment criteria, including the introduction of EPO administration policies or the conversion to alternate types of administration of EPO or other pharmaceuticals that result in further decreases in utilization or reimbursement for EPO and other pharmaceuticals, could have a material adverse effect on our revenues, earnings and cash flows.

Changes in EPO pricing could materially reduce our ~~revenues,~~ earnings and cash flows and affect our ability to care for our patients.

Amgen Inc. is the sole supplier of EPO and may unilaterally decide to increase its price for EPO at any time during the term of our agreement with Amgen. Future increases in the cost of EPO without corresponding increases in payment rates for EPO from commercial payors and without corresponding increases in the Medicare bundled rate could have a material adverse effect on our earnings and cash flows and ultimately reduce our income. Our agreement with Amgen for EPO ~~includes potential~~provides for discount pricing and rebates for EPO. Some of the rebates are subject to various qualification requirements for which ~~depend upon~~we will be evaluated during the ~~achievement~~term of the agreement. These qualification requirements are based on a variety of factors, including process improvement targets, patient outcome targets and data submission. In addition, the rebates are subject to certain ~~criteria.~~limitations. We cannot predict whether we will continue to receive the rebates for EPO that we currently receive, or whether we will continue to achieve the same levels of rebates within that structure as we have historically achieved. ~~Our agreement with Amgen provides for specific rebates off of list price based on a combination of factors, including process improvement and data submission.~~ Factors that could impact our

ability to qualify for rebates provided for in our agreement with Amgen in the future

include our ability to develop and implement certain process improvements and track certain data elements. Failure to meet certain targets and earn the specified rebates could have a material adverse effect on our earnings and cash flows. Our prior multi-year agreement with Amgen ~~terminates~~expired on December 31, ~~2010.~~2010, and we entered into a new shorter term agreement with Amgen, which agreement as amended, provides for a term that commenced January 1, 2011 and ends December 31, 2011. We cannot predict whether any new agreement with Amgen will include the same or similar discount pricing and rebates as provided in our current ~~agreement.~~agreement and, if so, whether we could meet any applicable qualification requirements for receiving them.

We are the subject of a number of inquiries by the federal government, any of which could result in substantial penalties against us, imposition of certain obligations on our practices and procedures, exclusion from future participation in the Medicare and Medicaid programs and, in certain cases, criminal penalties.

We are the subject of a number of inquiries by the federal government. We have received subpoenas from the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Northern District of Georgia, the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Eastern District of Missouri, the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Eastern District of Texas and the OIG’s Office in Dallas, Texas. We are cooperating with the U.S. Attorney’s Offices and the OIG Office with respect to each of the subpoenas and producing the requested records. Although we cannot predict whether or when proceedings might be initiated by the federal government or when these matters may be resolved, it is not unusual for investigations such as these to continue for a considerable period of time. Responding to the subpoenas will continue to require management’s attention and significant legal expense. Any negative findings could result in substantial financial penalties against us, imposition of certain obligations on our practices and procedures, exclusion from future participation in the Medicare and Medicaid programs and, in certain cases, criminal penalties. To our knowledge, no proceedings have been initiated by the federal government against us at this time. See Note 5 to our condensed consolidated financial statements for additional information and any updates regarding these inquiries and subpoenas.

Continued inquiries from various governmental bodies with respect to our utilization of EPO and other pharmaceuticals will require management’s attention, cause us to incur significant legal expense and could result in substantial financial penalties against us, repayment obligations or exclusion from future participation in the Medicare and Medicaid programs, and could have a material adverse effect on our revenues, earnings and cash flows.

In response to clinical studies which identified risks in certain patient populations related to the utilization of EPO and other ESAs, i.e., Aranesp^®, and in response to changes in the labeling of EPO and Aranesp^®, there has been substantial media attention and government scrutiny resulting in hearings and legislation regarding pharmaceutical utilization and reimbursement. Although we believe our anemia management practices and other pharmaceutical administration practices have been compliant with existing laws and regulations, as a result of the current high level of scrutiny and controversy, we may be subject to increased inquiries from a variety of governmental bodies and claims by third parties. For example, the subpoena from the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Northern District of Georgia relates to the pharmaceutical products Zemplar, Hectorol, Venofer, Ferrlecit, EPO and other related matters. The subpoena from the U.S. Attorney’s Office in the Eastern District of Missouri includes requests for documents regarding the administration of, and billing for, EPO. The subpoena from the Office of Inspector General in Houston, Texas requests records relating to EPO claims submitted to Medicare. In addition, in February 2008 the Attorney General’s Office for the State of Nevada notified us that Nevada Medicaid intends to conduct audits of ESRD dialysis providers in Nevada relating to the billing of pharmaceuticals, including EPO. Additional inquiries from or audits by various agencies and claims by third parties with respect to ~~this issue~~these issues would continue to require management’s attention and significant legal expense and any negative findings could result in substantial financial penalties ~~against~~or repayments, imposition of certain obligations on our practices and procedures and the attendant financial burden on us to comply, or exclusion from future participation in the Medicare and Medicaid programs, and could have a material adverse effect on our revenues, earnings and cash flows. See Note 5 to our condensed consolidated financial statements for additional information and any updates regarding these inquiries and subpoenas.

If we fail to adhere to all of the complex government regulations that apply to our business, we could suffer severe consequences that would substantially reduce our revenues, earnings and cash flows.

Our dialysis operations are subject to extensive federal, state and local government regulations, including Medicare and Medicaid payment rules and regulations, federal and state anti-kickback laws, the Stark Law physician self-referral prohibition and analogous state referral statutes, the federal False Claims Act, or FCA, and

federal and state laws regarding the collection, use and disclosure of patient health ~~information.~~information and the storage, handling and administration of pharmaceuticals. The Medicare and Medicaid reimbursement rules related to claims submission, enrollment and licensing requirements, cost reporting, and payment processes impose complex and extensive requirements upon dialysis providers. A violation or departure from any of these requirements may result in government audits, lower reimbursements, significant fines and penalties, the potential loss of certification and recoupments or voluntary repayments. CMS has indicated that after implementation of the Medicare bundled payment system, it will monitor use of EPO and whether blood transfusions replace EPO for anemia management.

The regulatory scrutiny of healthcare providers, including dialysis providers continues to increase. Medicare has increased the frequency and intensity of its certification inspections of dialysis centers. For example, we are required to provide substantial documentation related to the administration of pharmaceuticals, including EPO, and, to the extent that any such documentation is found insufficient, we may be required to refund ~~any amounts received from such administration by~~to government or commercial payors any amounts received for such administration, and be subject to substantial penalties under applicable laws or regulations. In addition, ~~fiscal intermediaries~~Medicare contractors have increased their prepayment and post-payment reviews.

We endeavor to comply with all of the requirements for receiving Medicare and Medicaid payments, ~~and~~ to structure all of our relationships with referring physicians to comply with state and federal anti-kickback laws and physician self-referral law (Stark Law)., and for storing, handling and administering pharmaceuticals. However, the laws and regulations in ~~this area~~these areas are complex, require considerable resources to comply with and are subject to varying interpretations. For example, if an enforcement agency were to challenge the level of compensation that we pay our medical directors or the number of medical directors that we engage, we could be required to change our practices, face criminal or civil penalties, pay substantial fines or otherwise experience a material adverse effect as a result of a challenge to these arrangements. In addition, recent amendments to the FCA impose severe penalties for the knowing and improper retention of overpayments collected from government payors. These amendments could subject our procedures for identifying and processing overpayments to greater scrutiny. We have made significant investments in additional resources to ~~accelerate~~decrease the time it takes to identify and process overpayments and we may be required to make additional investments in the future. An acceleration in our ability to identify and process overpayments could result in us refunding overpayments to government or other payors sooner than we have in the past. A significant acceleration of these refunds could have a material adverse affect on our operating cash flows. Additionally, amendments to the federal anti-kickback statute in the health reform law make anti-kickback violations subject to FCA prosecution, including qui tam or whistleblower suits.

If any of our operations are found to violate these or other government regulations, we could suffer severe consequences that would have a material adverse effect on our revenues, earnings and cash flows including:

Delays in state Medicare and Medicaid certification of our dialysis centers could adversely affect our revenues, earnings and cash flows.

Before we can begin billing for patients treated in our outpatient dialysis centers who are enrolled in government-based programs, we are required to obtain state and federal certification for participation in the Medicare and Medicaid programs. As state ~~governments~~agencies responsible for surveying dialysis centers on behalf of the state and Medicare program face increasing budgetary pressure, certain states are having difficulty keeping up with certifying dialysis centers in the normal course resulting in significant delays in certification. If state governments continue to have difficulty keeping up with certifying new centers in the normal course and we continue to experience significant delays in our ability to treat and bill for services provided to patients covered under government programs, it could cause us to incur write-offs of investments or accelerate the recognition of lease obligations in the event we have to close centers or our centers’ operating performance deteriorates, and it could have an adverse effect on our revenues, earnings and cash flows.

If our joint ventures were found to violate the law, we could suffer severe consequences that would have a material adverse effect on our revenues, earnings and cash flows.

As of ~~September 30, 2010,~~March 31, 2011, we owned a controlling interest in numerous ~~dialysis related~~dialysis-related joint ventures, which represented approximately 18% of our dialysis and related lab services revenues for the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September 30, 2010.~~March 31, 2011. In addition, we also owned minority equity ~~interests~~investments in several other dialysis related joint ventures. We anticipate that we will continue to increase the number of our joint ventures. Many of our joint ventures with physicians or physician groups also have the physician owners providing medical director services to those centers or other centers we own and operate. Because our relationships with physicians are governed by the federal anti-kickback statute, we have sought to structure our joint venture arrangements to satisfy as many safe harbor requirements as we believe are reasonably possible. However, our joint venture arrangements do not satisfy all elements of any safe harbor under the federal anti-kickback statute. The subpoena and related requests for documents we received from the ~~United States~~U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Eastern District of Missouri included requests for documents related to our joint ventures. We were ~~recently~~ advised by the U.S. Department of Justice that it is conducting a civil investigation into our financial relationships with physicians. See Note 5 to our condensed consolidated financial statements for additional information and any updates regarding these inquiries and subpoenas.

If our joint ventures are found to be in violation of the anti-kickback statute or the Stark Law provisions, we could be required to restructure the joint ventures or refuse to accept referrals for designated health services from the physicians with whom the joint venture centers have a financial relationship.

We also could be required to repay amounts received by the joint ventures from Medicare and certain other payors to the extent that these arrangements are found to give rise to prohibited referrals, and we could be subject to monetary penalties and exclusion from government healthcare programs. If our joint venture centers are subject to any of these penalties, we could suffer severe consequences that would have a material adverse effect on our revenues, earnings and cash flows.

There are significant estimating risks associated with the amount of dialysis revenue and related refund liabilities that we recognize and if we are unable to accurately estimate our revenue and related refund liabilities, it could impact the timing of our revenue recognition or have a significant impact on our operating results.

There are significant estimating risks associated with the amount of dialysis and related lab services revenues and related refund liabilities that we recognize in a reporting period. The billing and collection process

is complex due to ongoing insurance coverage changes, geographic coverage differences, differing interpretations of contract coverage, and other payor issues. Determining applicable primary and secondary coverage for approximately ~~124,000~~128,000 patients at any point in time, together with the changes in patient coverage that occur each month, requires complex, resource-intensive processes. Errors in determining the correct coordination of benefits may result in refunds to payors. Revenues associated with Medicare and Medicaid programs are also subject to estimating risk related to the amounts not paid by the primary government payor that will ultimately be collectible from other government programs paying secondary coverage, the patient’s commercial health plan secondary coverage or the patient. Collections, refunds and payor retractions typically continue to occur for up to three years and longer after services are provided. We generally expect our range of dialysis and related lab services revenues estimating risk to be within 1% of revenues for the segment, which can represent as much as 6% of consolidated operating income. If our estimates of dialysis and related lab services revenues and related refund liabilities are materially inaccurate, it could impact the timing of our revenue recognition and have a significant impact on our operating results.

The ancillary services we provide or the strategic initiatives we invest in now or in the future may generate losses and may ultimately be unsuccessful. In the event that one or more of these activities is unsuccessful, we may have to write off our investment and incur other exit costs.

Our ancillary services and strategic initiatives currently include pharmacy services, infusion therapy services, disease management services, vascular access services, ESRD clinical research programs and physician services. We expect to add additional service offerings and pursue additional strategic initiatives in the future as circumstances warrant. Many of these initiatives require or would require investments of both management and financial resources and can generate significant losses for a substantial period of time and may not become profitable. There can be no assurance that any such strategic initiative will ultimately be successful. Any significant change in market conditions, or business performance, or in the political, legislative or regulatory environment, may impact the economic viability of any of these strategic initiatives. For example, during ~~2009~~2010 and ~~2008,~~2009, several of our strategic initiatives generated net operating losses and some are expected to generate net operating losses in ~~2010.~~2011. If any of our ancillary services or strategic initiatives do not perform as planned, we may incur a material write-off or an impairment of our investment, including goodwill, in one or more of these activities or we could incur significant termination costs if we were to exit a certain line of business.

If a significant number of physicians were to cease referring patients to our dialysis centers, whether due to regulatory or other reasons, it would have a material adverse effect on our revenues, earnings and cash flows.

We believe that physicians prefer to have their patients treated at dialysis centers where they or other members of their practice supervise the overall care provided as medical director of the center. As a result, the primary referral source for most of our centers is often the physician or physician group providing medical director services to the center. Neither our current nor former medical directors have an obligation to refer their patients to our centers. If a medical director agreement terminates, whether before or at the end of its term, and a new medical director is appointed, it may negatively impact the former medical director’s decision to treat his or her patients at our center. If we are unable to enforce noncompetition provisions contained in the terminated medical director agreements, former medical directors may choose to provide medical director services for competing providers or establish their own dialysis centers in competition with ours. Also, if the quality of service levels at our centers deteriorates, it may negatively impact patient referrals and treatment volumes.

Our medical director contracts are for fixed periods, generally three to ten years, and at any given time a large number of them could be up for renewal at the same time. Medical directors have no obligation to extend their agreements with us. We may take actions to restructure existing relationships or take positions in negotiating extensions of relationships to assure compliance with the anti-kickback statute, Stark Law and other similar laws. These actions could negatively impact the decision of physicians to extend their medical director agreements with us or to refer their patients to us. If the terms of any existing agreement are found to violate applicable laws, we may not be successful in restructuring the relationship which could lead to the early

termination of the agreement, or cause the physician to stop referring patients to our dialysis centers. If a significant number of physicians were to cease referring patients to our dialysis centers, whether due to regulatory or other reasons, then our revenues, earnings and cash flows would be substantially reduced.

Current economic conditions as well as further disruptions in the financial markets could have a material adverse effect on our revenues, earnings and cash flows and otherwise adversely affect our financial condition.

Current economic conditions could adversely affect our business and our profitability. Among other things, the potential decline in federal and state revenues that may result from such conditions may create additional pressures to contain or reduce reimbursements for our services from Medicare, Medicaid and other government sponsored programs. Increasing job losses or slow improvement in the unemployment rate in the United States as a result of current or recent economic conditions has and may continue to result in a smaller percentage of our patients being covered by an employer group health plan and a larger percentage being covered by lower paying Medicare and Medicaid programs. Employers may also begin to select more restrictive commercial plans with lower reimbursement rates. To the extent that payors are negatively impacted by a decline in the economy, we may experience further pressure on commercial rates, a further ~~slow down~~slowdown in collections and a reduction in the amounts we expect to collect. In addition, uncertainty in the financial markets could adversely affect the variable interest rates payable under our credit facilities or could make it more difficult to obtain or renew such facilities or to obtain other forms of financing in the future. Any or all of these factors, as well as other consequences of the current economic conditions which cannot currently be anticipated, could have a material adverse effect on our revenues, earnings and cash flows and otherwise adversely affect our financial condition.

We may engage in acquisitions, mergers or dispositions, which may affect our results of operations, debt-to-capital ratio, capital expenditures or other aspects of our business.

We may engage in acquisitions, mergers or dispositions, which may affect our results of operations, debt-to-capital ratio, capital expenditures, or other aspects of our business. There can be no assurance that we will be able to identify suitable acquisition targets or merger partners or that, if identified, we will be able to acquire these targets on acceptable terms or agree to terms with merger partners. There can also be no assurance that we will be successful in completing any acquisitions, mergers or dispositions that we might be considering or announce, or integrating any acquired business into our overall operations or operate them successfully as stand-alone businesses, or that any such acquired business will operate profitably or will not otherwise adversely impact our results of operations. Further, we cannot be certain that key talented individuals at the business being acquired will continue to work for us after the acquisition or that they will be able to continue to successfully manage or have adequate resources to successfully operate any acquired business.

If we are not able to continue to make acquisitions, or maintain an acceptable level of non-acquired growth, or if we face significant patient attrition to our competitors or a reduction in the number of our medical directors, it could adversely affect our business.

The dialysis industry is highly competitive, particularly in terms of acquiring existing dialysis centers. We continue to face increased competition in the dialysis industry from large and medium-sized providers which compete directly with us for acquisition targets as well as for individual patients and medical directors.

Acquisitions, patient retention and medical director retention are an important part of our growth strategy. Because of the ease of entry into the dialysis business and the ability of physicians to be medical directors for their own centers, competition for growth in existing and expanding markets is not limited to large competitors with substantial financial resources. Occasionally, we have experienced competition from former medical directors or referring physicians who have opened their own dialysis centers. In addition, Fresenius, our largest competitor, manufactures a full line of dialysis supplies and equipment in addition to owning and operating dialysis centers. This may give it cost advantages over us because of its ability to manufacture its own products. If we are not able to continue to make acquisitions, continue to maintain acceptable levels of non-acquired growth, or if we face significant patient attrition to our competitors or a reduction in the number of our medical directors, it could adversely affect our business.

If businesses we acquire have liabilities that we are not aware of, we could suffer severe consequences that would substantially reduce our ~~revenues,~~ earnings and cash flows.

Our business strategy includes the acquisition of dialysis centers and businesses that own and operate dialysis centers, as well as other ancillary services and strategic initiatives. Businesses we acquire may have unknown or contingent liabilities or liabilities that are in excess of the amounts that we originally estimated. Although we generally seek indemnification from the sellers of businesses we acquire for matters that are not properly disclosed to us, we are not always successful. In addition, even in cases where we are able to obtain indemnification, we may discover liabilities greater than the contractual limits or the financial resources of the indemnifying party. In the event that we are responsible for liabilities substantially in excess of any amounts recovered through rights to indemnification, we could suffer severe consequences that would substantially reduce our ~~revenues,~~ earnings and cash flows.

Expansion of our operations to and offering our services in markets outside of the United States subjects us to political, legal, operational and other risks that could have a materially adverse affect on our business, ~~and~~ results of ~~operations.~~operations and cash flows.

We are undertaking an expansion of our operations and beginning to offer our services outside of the United States, which increases our exposure to the inherent risks of doing business in international markets. Depending on the market, these risks include, without limitation, those relating to:

Conducting international operations ~~also could require~~requires us to devote significant management resources to implement our controls and systems in new markets, to comply with the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and similar laws in local jurisdictions and to overcome the numerous new challenges inherent in managing international operations, including those based on differing languages, cultures and regulatory ~~environments.~~environments, and those related to the timely hiring and integration of a sufficient number of skilled personnel to carry out operations.

We ~~expect to expand~~anticipate expanding our international operations through ~~acquisition~~acquisitions of varying sizes or ~~otherwise,~~organic growth, which ~~would~~could increase these risks. Additionally, though we might invest ~~substantial~~material amounts of capital and incur significant costs in connection with the growth and development of our international operations, there is no assurance that we will be able to operate them profitably anytime soon, if at all. As a result, we would expect these costs to be dilutive to our earnings over the next several years as we start-up or acquire new operations.

AsThese risks could have a ~~result of these risks,~~material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations and cash ~~flows could be materially adversely affected.~~

The level of our current and future debt could have an adverse impact on our business and our ability to generate cash to service our indebtedness depends on many factors beyond our control.

We have substantial debt outstanding and we may incur additional indebtedness in the future. The high level of our indebtedness, among other things, could:

Our ability to make payments on our indebtedness and to fund planned capital expenditures and expansion efforts, including any strategic acquisitions we may make in the future, will depend on our ability to generate cash. This, to a certain extent, is subject to general economic, financial, competitive, regulatory and other factors that are beyond our control.

We cannot provide assurance that our business will generate sufficient cash flow from operations in the future or that future borrowings will be available to us in an amount sufficient to enable us to service our indebtedness or to fund other liquidity needs. ~~Our~~The borrowings under the Credit Agreement isare guaranteed by substantially all of our direct and indirect wholly-owned domestic subsidiaries and are secured by substantially all of ~~our~~DaVita’s and ~~our direct and indirect wholly-owned subsidiaries’~~its guarantors’ assets. As such, our ability to refinance our debt or seek additional financing could be limited by such security interest. If additional debt financing is not available when required or is not available on acceptable terms, we may be unable to grow our business, take advantage of business opportunities, respond to competitive pressures or refinance maturing debt, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our operating results and financial condition.

Increases in interest rates may increase our interest expense and adversely affect our earnings and cash flow and our ability to service our indebtedness.

A ~~significant~~ portion of our outstanding debt bears interest at variable rates. We are subject to LIBOR-based interest rate volatility ~~associated with the portions~~from a floor of 1.50% to a cap of 4.00% on $1.25 billion of our ~~borrowings~~Term Loan B outstanding debt as a result of several interest rate cap agreements that ~~bear~~were entered into in January 2011. The remaining $500 million of outstanding debt on the Term Loan B is subject to LIBOR-based interest rate volatility above a floor of 1.50%. Our Term Loan A bears interest at LIBOR-based variable rates. As of September 30, 2010, we had approximately $1.8 billion outstanding borrowings under our existing Senior Secured Credit Facilities, which bore interest at a variable rate. On October 20, 2010,rates, however, in January 2011, we entered into ~~new Senior Secured Credit Facilities and repaid~~several interest rate swap agreements with amortizing notional amounts totaling $988 million as of March 31,

2011. These agreements have the ~~outstanding principal balances~~economic effect of modifying the LIBOR variable component of our ~~existing Senior Secured Credit Facilities.~~interest rate on an equivalent amount of Term Loan A debt to fixed rates. We also have approximately ~~$2.8 billion outstanding~~$250 million of additional borrowings available under our new Senior Secured Credit Facilities which will bear interest at a variable rate. We may also incur additional variable rate debt in the future. Increases in interest rates would increase our interest expense of the variable portion of our indebtedness, which could negatively impact our earnings and cash flow and our ability to service our ~~indebtedness.~~

~~Increases~~indebtedness which would be particularly significant in the event of rapid and substantial increases in interest rates.

If interest rates were to hypothetically increase by 100 basis points it would ~~increase~~not currently have any material impact on our ~~interest expense for the variable portion~~financial results since all of our ~~indebtedness, which could negatively impact~~Term Loan A is economically fixed and our ~~earnings and cash flow. For example, it~~Term Loan B is ~~estimated that~~subject to LIBOR-based interest rate volatility above a floor of 1.50%, as described above. The current LIBOR rate in effect, plus a hypothetical increase ~~in interest rates~~ of 100 basis points, ~~across all variable rate maturities under the existing Senior Secured Credit Facilities would reduce net income by approximately $10.9 million, for the next twelve months given~~is less than our ~~current~~Term Loan B floor of 1.50%. Therefore, LIBOR-based interest rates ~~in effect at September 30, 2010.~~would have to move above a floor of 1.50% to have a negative impact on our financial results. See “Item ~~3 –~~ 3—Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk” for more information. In addition, if we seek to refinance our existing indebtedness under our Senior Secured Credit Facilities, we may not be able to do so on acceptable terms and conditions, which could increase our interest expense or impair our ability to service our indebtedness and fund our operations.

If there are shortages of skilled clinical personnel or if we experience a higher than normal turnover rate, we may experience disruptions in our business operations and increases in operating expenses.

We are experiencing increased labor costs and difficulties in hiring nurses due to a nationwide shortage of skilled clinical personnel. We compete for nurses with hospitals and other health care providers. This nursing shortage may limit our ability to expand our operations. In addition, changes in certification requirements or increases in the required staffing levels for skilled clinical personnel can impact our ability to maintain sufficient staff levels to the extent our teammates are not able to meet new requirements or competition for qualified individuals increases. If we are unable to hire skilled clinical personnel when needed, or if we experience a higher than normal turnover rate for our skilled clinical personnel, our operations and treatment growth will be negatively impacted, which would result in reduced revenues, earnings and cash flows.

Our business is labor intensive and could be adversely affected if we were unable to maintain satisfactory relations with our employees or if union organizing activities were to result in significant increases in our operating costs or decreases in productivity.

Our business is labor intensive, and our results are subject to variations in labor-related costs, productivity and ~~productivity.~~the number of pending or potential claims against us related to labor and employment practices. If political efforts at the national and local level result in actions or proposals that increase the likelihood of union organizing activities at our facilities or if union organizing activities increase for other reasons, or if labor and employment claims, including the filing of class action suits, trend upwards, our operating costs could increase and our employee relations, productivity, earnings and cash flows could be adversely affected.

Upgrades to our billing and collections systems and complications associated with upgrades and other improvements to our billing and collections systems could have a material adverse effect on our revenues, cash flows and operating results.

We are continuously performing upgrades to our billing systems and expect to continue to do so in the near term. In addition, we continuously work to improve our billing and collections performance through process upgrades, organizational changes and other improvements. We may experience difficulties in our ability to successfully bill and collect for services rendered as a result of these changes, including a slow-down of collections, a reduction in the amounts we expect to collect, increased risk of retractions from and refunds to commercial and government payors, an increase in our provision for uncollectible accounts receivable and noncompliance with reimbursement regulations. The failure to successfully implement the upgrades to the billing and collection systems and other improvements could have a material adverse effect on our revenues, cash flows and operating results.

Our ability to effectively provide the services we offer could be negatively impacted if certain of our suppliers are unable to meet our needs or if we are unable to effectively access new technology, which could substantially reduce our revenues, earnings and cash flows.

We have significant suppliers that are either the sole or primary source of products critical to the services we provide, including Amgen, Baxter Healthcare Corporation, NxStage Medical, Inc. and others or to which we have committed obligations to make purchases including Gambro Renal Products and ~~Fresenius Medical Care.~~Fresenius. If any of these suppliers are unable to meet our needs for the products they supply, including in the event of a product recall, or shortage, and we are not able to find adequate alternative sources, or if some of the drugs that we purchase are not reimbursed ~~either separately or (after January 1, 2011)~~ through the bundled payment rate by Medicare, our revenues, earnings and cash flows could be substantially reduced. In addition, the technology related to the products critical to the services we provide is subject to new developments and may result in superior products. If we are not able to access superior products on a cost-effective basis or if suppliers are not able to fulfill our requirements for such products, we could face patient attrition which could substantially reduce our revenues, earnings and cash flows.

We may be subject to liability claims for damages and other expenses not covered by insurance that could reduce our earnings and cash flows.

The administration of dialysis and related services to patients may subject us to litigation and liability for damages. Our business, profitability and growth prospects could suffer if we face negative publicity or we pay damages or defense costs in connection with a claim that is outside the scope of any applicable insurance coverage, including claims related to adverse patient events, contractual disputes and professional and general liability claims. In addition, we have received several notices of claims from commercial payors and other third parties related to our historical billing practices and the historical billing practices of the centers acquired from Gambro Healthcare and other matters related to their settlement agreement with the Department of Justice. Although the ultimate outcome of these claims cannot be predicted, an adverse result with respect to one or more of these claims could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows. We currently maintain programs of general and professional liability insurance. However, a successful claim, including a professional liability, malpractice or negligence claim which is in excess of our insurance coverage could have a material adverse effect on our earnings and cash flows.

In addition, if our costs of insurance and claims increase, then our earnings could decline. Market rates for insurance premiums and deductibles have been steadily increasing. Our earnings and cash flows could be materially and adversely affected by any of the following:

Provisions in our charter documents, compensation programs and Delaware law may deter a change of control that our stockholders would otherwise determine to be in their best interests.

Our charter documents include provisions that may deter hostile takeovers, delay or prevent changes of control or changes in our management, or limit the ability of our stockholders to approve transactions that they may otherwise determine to be in their best interests. These include provisions prohibiting our stockholders from acting by written consent; requiring 90 days advance notice of stockholder proposals or nominations to our Board of Directors; and granting our Board of Directors the authority to issue preferred stock and to determine the rights and preferences of the preferred stock without the need for further stockholder approval. ~~In addition, we have in place a shareholder rights plan that would substantially dilute the interest sought by an acquirer that our Board of Directors does not approve.~~

Most of our outstanding employee stock options include a provision accelerating the vesting of the options in the event of a change of control. We also maintain a change of control protection program for our employees

who do not have a significant number of stock awards, which has been in place since 2001, and which provides for cash bonuses to the employees in the event of a change of control. Based on the market price of our common stock and shares outstanding on ~~September 30, 2010,~~March 31, 2011, these cash bonuses would total approximately ~~$273~~$323 million if a change of control transaction occurred at that price and our Board of Directors did not modify this program. These change of control provisions may affect the price an acquirer would be willing to pay for our Company.

We are also subject to Section 203 of the Delaware General Corporation Law that, subject to exceptions, would prohibit us from engaging in any business combinations with any interested stockholder, as defined in that section, for a period of three years following the date on which that stockholder became an interested stockholder.

These provisions may discourage, delay or prevent an acquisition of our Company at a price that our stockholders may find attractive. These provisions could also make it more difficult for our stockholders to elect

directors and take other corporate actions and could limit the price that investors might be willing to pay for shares of our common stock.

The following table summarizes the Company’s repurchases of its common stock during the ~~third~~first quarter of ~~2010:~~2011:

This stock repurchase program has no expiration date. We are authorized to make purchases from time to time in the open market or in privately negotiated transactions, depending upon market conditions and other considerations. However, we are subject to share repurchase limitations under the terms of the Senior Secured Credit Facilities and the indentures governing our senior notes.

In addition, we repurchased a total of ~~4,244,300~~969,100 shares of our common stock from ~~October~~April 1, ~~2010~~2011 through ~~October 22, 2010,~~April 30, 2011 for ~~$301.5~~$84.4 million ~~which completed~~or an average price of $87.08 per share. As a result of these transactions, our ~~previous~~remaining board authorization for share ~~repurchases. On November 3, 2010, our Board~~repurchases as of ~~Directors authorized an additional $800 million of share repurchases of our common stock.~~April 30, 2011 is approximately $583.5 million.

On May 2, 2011, we entered into Amendment No. 2 (the “Amendment”) to the Dialysis Organization Agreement (the “Agreement”) with Amgen USA Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of Amgen Inc. The Agreement sets forth the terms under which we and certain of our affiliates will purchase EPO. The Amendment extended the term of the Agreement from June 30, 2011 until December 31, 2011 and amended the rebates for EPO. The foregoing description of the Amendment is qualified in its entirety by reference to the actual text of the Amendment, a copy of which we expect to file as an exhibit to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2011.

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.


Delaware		51-0354549
(State of incorporation)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)


		Page No.
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1.	Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements:
	Consolidated Statements of Income for the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2011 and March 31, 2010 ~~and September 30, 2009~~		1
	Consolidated Balance Sheets as of ~~September 30, 2010~~March 31, 2011 and December 31, ~~2009~~2010		2
	Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2011 and March 31, 2010 ~~and September 30, 2009~~		3
	Consolidated Statements of Equity and Comprehensive Income for the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September 30, 2010~~March 31, 2011 and for the year ended December 31, ~~2009~~2010		4
	Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements		5
Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations		23
Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk		3734
Item 4.	Controls and Procedures		3735

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1.	Legal Proceedings		3936
Item 1A.	Risk Factors		3936
Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds		5250
Item 5.	Other Information		50
Item 6.	Exhibits		5351
Signature			5452


	March 31, 2011			December 31, 2010
Senior Secured Credit Facilities:
Term loan A	$	987,500		$	1,000,000
Term loan B		1,745,625			1,750,000
Senior notes		1,550,000			1,550,000
Acquisition obligations and other notes payable		8,612			9,049
Capital lease obligations		9,027			8,074

Total debt principal outstanding		4,300,764			4,317,123
Discount on long-term debt		(8,012	)		(8,381	)

		4,292,752			4,308,742
Less current portion		(74,551	)		(74,892	)

	$	4,218,201		$	4,233,850


	September 30, 2010			December 31, 2009
Senior Secured Credit Facilities:
Term loan A	$	87,500		$	153,125
Term loan B		1,705,875			1,705,875
Senior and senior subordinated notes		1,550,000			1,750,000
Acquisition obligations and other notes payable		10,503			15,891
Capital lease obligations		6,956			4,635

Total debt principal outstanding		3,360,834			3,629,526
Premium on the 6⁵/8% senior notes		1,608			2,698

		3,362,442			3,632,224
Less current portion		(96,252	)		(100,007	)

	$	3,266,190		$	3,532,217


2011 (remainder of the year)			57,430
2012			68,962
2013			119,031
2014			168,483
2015			668,172
2016			1,663,100
Thereafter			1,555,586


	Three months ended March 31, 2011
Tangible assets, principally leasehold improvements and equipment	$	6,290
Amortizable intangible assets		1,912
Goodwill		91,270
Noncontrolling interests assumed		(17,877	)
Liabilities assumed		(72	)

Aggregate purchase cost	$	81,523


	Remainder of 2011		1-3 years		4-5 years			After 5 years		Total
Scheduled payments under contractual obligations:
Long-term debt	$	57	$	186	$	835		$	3,214	$	4,292
Interest payments		104		202		202			379		887
Interest payments on the Term Loan B⁽¹⁾		60		157		153			61		431
Capital lease obligations		1		2		1			5		9
Operating leases		187		425		358			603		1,573
Construction of the new corporate headquarters		55		30		—			—		85

	$	464	$	1,002	$	1,549		$	4,262	$	7,277

Potential cash requirements under existing commitments:
Letters of credit	$	46	$	—	$	—		$	—	$	46
Noncontrolling interests subject to put provisions		225		69		52			60		406
Pay-fixed swaps potential obligations		9		—		(8	)		—		1
Operating capital advances		2		—		—			—		2

	$	282	$	69	$	44		$	60	$	455


	Less than 1 year		1-3 years		3-5 years		After 5 years		Total
Scheduled payments under contractual obligations:
Long-term debt	$	29	$	1,773	$	701	$	851	$	3,354
Interest payments on senior and senior subordinated notes		—		216		146		31		393
Capital lease obligations		—		1		2		4		7
Operating leases		59		425		340		618		1,442

	$	88	$	2,415	$	1,189	$	1,504	$	5,196

Potential cash requirements under existing commitments:
Letters of credit	$	52	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	52
Noncontrolling interests subject to put provisions		194		58		66		50		368
Operating capital advances for third-party-owned centers and equity investments and clinics under management and administrative services agreements		4		—		—		—		4
Income tax liabilities for unrecognized tax benefits		7		—		—		—		7

	$	257	$	58	$	66	$	50	$	431


	Notional amount		Contract maturity date										Pay fixed		Receive variable		Fair value
	Notional amount		2011		2012		2013		2014		2015		Pay fixed		Receive variable		Fair value
	(dollars in millions)
Swaps:
Pay-fixed rate	$	988	$	38	$	50	$	100	$	800	$	—		1.59% to 1.64%		LIBOR	$	(0.9	)
Cap agreements	$	1,250	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	1,250	$	—				LIBOR above 4.00%	$	9.6


Period	Total number of shares purchased		Average price paid per share		Total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs⁽¹⁾		Approximate dollar value of shares that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs (in millions)
July 1-31, 2010		—	$	—		—	$	400
August 1-31, 2010		—		—		—		400
September 1-30, 2010		1,448,000		68.02		1,448,000		301.5

Total		1,448,000	$	68.02		1,448,000


Exhibit Number
3.1		Amended and Restated Bylaws, amended March 10, 2011.⁽¹⁾

4.1		First Amendment to Rights Agreement, dated as of March 10, 2011, between DaVita Inc. and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as Rights Agent.ü

10.1		Credit Agreement, dated as of October 20, 2010, by and among DaVita Inc., the guarantors party thereto, the lenders party thereto, Credit Suisse AG, Barclays Bank PLC, Goldman Sachs Bank USA, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, Credit Agricole Corporate and Investment Bank, RBC Capital Markets, Scotia Capital (USA) Inc., SunTrust Robinson Humphrey, Inc. and Union Bank, N.A., as Co-Documentation Agents, Bank of America, N.A., as Syndication Agent, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as Administrative Agent and Collateral Agent, and J.P. Morgan Securities LLC, Banc of America Securities LLC, Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC, Barclays Capital, Goldman Sachs Bank USA and Wells Fargo Securities, LLC, as Joint Lead Arrangers and Joint Bookrunners.ü**

12.1		Ratio of earnings to fixed charges.ü

31.1		Certification of the Chief Executive Officer, dated ~~November 5, 2010,~~May 6, 2011, pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) or 15d-14(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.ü

31.2		Certification of the Chief Financial Officer, dated ~~November 5, 2010,~~May 6, 2011, pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) or 15d-14(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.ü

32.1		Certification of the Chief Executive Officer, dated ~~November 5, 2010,~~May 6, 2011, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.ü

32.2		Certification of the Chief Financial Officer, dated ~~November 5, 2010,~~May 6, 2011, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.ü

101.INS		XBRL Instance Document. *

101.SCH		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document. *

101.CAL		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document. *

101.DEF		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document. *

101.LAB		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document. *

101.PRE		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation, Linkbase Document. *


DAVITA INC.

By:		/s/ JAMES K. HILGER
		James K. Hilger Chief
		~~Chief~~ Accounting Officer*