Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No ¨.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filerx Accelerated filer¨ Non-accelerated filer¨ Smaller reporting company¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No x.

The number of shares of Class A common stock outstanding at ~~April~~July 29, 2011 was ~~324,987,355.~~325,097,062.


	March 31, 2011			December 31, 2010			June 30, 2011			December 31, 2010
	(Unaudited)						(Unaudited)
ASSETS
Current Assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	427,645		$	506,574		$	752,109		$	506,574
Restricted cash		46,533			52,257			49,221			52,257
Receivables, less allowance for doubtful accounts of $35,098 and $33,272 at March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively		889,076			940,167
Receivables, less allowance for doubtful accounts of $39,078 and $33,272 at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively								968,585			940,167
Warehouse receivables		285,673			485,433			308,249			485,433
Income taxes receivable		26,912			—			36,356			—
Prepaid expenses		95,523			96,951			100,251			96,951
Deferred tax assets, net		120,545			112,304			112,969			112,304
Real estate under development		27,324			—
Real estate and other assets held for sale		6,255			16,295			558			16,295
Other current assets		43,547			50,889			50,756			50,889

Total Current Assets		1,969,033			2,260,870			2,379,054			2,260,870
Property and equipment, net		193,367			188,397			216,584			188,397
Goodwill		1,342,850			1,323,801			1,407,543			1,323,801
Other intangible assets, net of accumulated amortization of $174,621 and $166,295 at March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively		331,758			332,855
Other intangible assets, net of accumulated amortization of $182,361 and $166,295 at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively								333,940			332,855
Investments in unconsolidated subsidiaries		146,799			138,973			145,158			138,973
Deferred tax assets, net		1,014			10,320			6,300			10,320
Real estate under development		87,845			112,819			90,469			112,819
Real estate held for investment		572,250			626,395			539,920			626,395
Available for sale securities		33,081			31,936			33,930			31,936
Other assets, net		114,901			95,202			129,834			95,202

Total Assets	$	4,792,898		$	5,121,568		$	5,282,732		$	5,121,568

LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
Current Liabilities:
Accounts payable and accrued expenses	$	429,526		$	445,337		$	441,799		$	445,337
Compensation and employee benefits payable		342,716			346,539			337,062			346,539
Accrued bonus and profit sharing		271,700			455,523			224,969			455,523
Income taxes payable		—			18,398			—			18,398
Short-term borrowings:
Warehouse lines of credit		277,676			453,835			302,490			453,835
Revolving credit facility		60,690			17,516			111,220			17,516
Other		16			16			16			16

Total short-term borrowings		338,382			471,367			413,726			471,367
Current maturities of long-term debt		38,055			38,086			42,038			38,086
Notes payable on real estate		138,635			154,213			153,598			154,213
Liabilities related to real estate and other assets held for sale		5,833			12,152			46			12,152
Other current liabilities		16,756			15,153			17,598			15,153

Total Current Liabilities		1,581,603			1,956,768			1,630,836			1,956,768
Long-Term Debt:
Senior secured term loans		593,000			602,500			979,500			602,500
11.625% senior subordinated notes, net of unamortized discount of $11,999 and $12,318 at March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively		438,001			437,682
11.625% senior subordinated notes, net of unamortized discount of $11,671 and $12,318 at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively								438,329			437,682
6.625% senior notes		350,000			350,000			350,000			350,000
Other long-term debt		46			54			85			54

Total Long-Term Debt		1,381,047			1,390,236			1,767,914			1,390,236
Pension liability		40,626			40,007			40,061			40,007
Non-current tax liabilities		80,554			78,306			81,217			78,306
Notes payable on real estate		427,245			461,665			366,353			461,665
Other liabilities		132,678			128,791			156,693			128,791

Total Liabilities		3,643,753			4,055,773			4,043,074			4,055,773
Commitments and contingencies		—			—			—			—
Equity:
CB Richard Ellis Group, Inc. Stockholders’ Equity:
Class A common stock; $0.01 par value; 525,000,000 shares authorized; 324,663,281 and 323,594,919 shares issued and outstanding at March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively		3,247			3,236
Class A common stock; $0.01 par value; 525,000,000 shares authorized; 324,992,942 and 323,594,919 shares issued and outstanding at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively								3,250			3,236
Additional paid-in capital		837,958			814,244			854,983			814,244
Accumulated earnings		219,706			185,337			280,929			185,337
Accumulated other comprehensive loss		(64,401	)		(94,602	)		(56,158	)		(94,602	)

Total CB Richard Ellis Group, Inc. Stockholders’ Equity		996,510			908,215			1,083,004			908,215
Non-controlling interests		152,635			157,580			156,654			157,580

Total Equity		1,149,145			1,065,795			1,239,658			1,065,795

Total Liabilities and Equity	$	4,792,898		$	5,121,568		$	5,282,732		$	5,121,568

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.


	Three Months Ended March 31,					Three Months Ended June 30,					Six Months Ended June 30,
	2011		2010			2011		2010			2011		2010
Revenue	$	1,185,105	$	1,025,883		$	1,422,218	$	1,171,919		$	2,607,323	$	2,197,802
Costs and expenses:
Cost of services		713,755		615,194			839,822		678,714			1,553,577		1,293,908
Operating, administrative and other		377,025		338,706			432,856		372,033			809,881		710,739
Depreciation and amortization		23,178		26,295			25,385		27,616			48,563		53,911

Total costs and expenses		1,113,958		980,195			1,298,063		1,078,363			2,412,021		2,058,558
Gain on disposition of real estate		1,972		—			6,027		3,623			7,999		3,623

Operating income		73,119		45,688			130,182		97,179			203,301		142,867
Equity income (loss) from unconsolidated subsidiaries		15,179		(6,584	)
Equity income from unconsolidated subsidiaries							17,068		14,235			32,247		7,651
Interest income		2,668		1,800			1,902		3,111			4,570		4,911
Interest expense		33,718		49,792			34,216		50,275			67,934		100,067

Income (loss) from continuing operations before provision for income taxes		57,248		(8,888	)
Income from continuing operations before provision for income taxes							114,936		64,250			172,184		55,362
Provision for income taxes		23,406		7,299			46,336		26,704			69,742		34,003

Income (loss) from continuing operations		33,842		(16,187	)
Net income from continuing operations							68,600		37,546			102,442		21,359
Income from discontinued operations, net of income taxes		10,644		—			6,267		7,140			16,911		7,140

Net income (loss)		44,486		(16,187	)
Net income							74,867		44,686			119,353		28,499
Less: Net income (loss) attributable to non-controlling interests		10,117		(9,560	)		13,644		(10,104	)		23,761		(19,664	)

Net income (loss) attributable to CB Richard Ellis Group, Inc.	$	34,369	$	(6,627	)
Net income attributable to CB Richard Ellis Group, Inc.						$	61,223	$	54,790		$	95,592	$	48,163

Basic income (loss) per share attributable to CB Richard Ellis Group, Inc. shareholders
Income (loss) from continuing operations attributable to CB Richard Ellis Group, Inc.	$	0.11	$	(0.02	)
Basic income per share attributable to CB Richard Ellis Group, Inc. shareholders
Income from continuing operations attributable to CB Richard Ellis Group, Inc.						$	0.19	$	0.15		$	0.30	$	0.13
Income from discontinued operations attributable to CB Richard Ellis Group, Inc.		—		—			—		0.02			—		0.02

Net income (loss) attributable to CB Richard Ellis Group, Inc.	$	0.11	$	(0.02	)
Net income attributable to CB Richard Ellis Group, Inc.						$	0.19	$	0.17		$	0.30	$	0.15

Weighted average shares outstanding for basic income (loss) per share		316,563,392		312,879,640
Weighted average shares outstanding for basic income per share							317,698,275		312,910,934			317,133,967		312,895,372

Diluted income (loss) per share attributable to CB Richard Ellis Group, Inc. shareholders
Income (loss) from continuing operations attributable to CB Richard Ellis Group, Inc.	$	0.11	$	(0.02	)
Diluted income per share attributable to CB Richard Ellis Group, Inc. shareholders
Income from continuing operations attributable to CB Richard Ellis Group, Inc.						$	0.19	$	0.15		$	0.30	$	0.13
Income from discontinued operations attributable to CB Richard Ellis Group, Inc.		—		—			—		0.02			—		0.02

Net income (loss) attributable to CB Richard Ellis Group, Inc.	$	0.11	$	(0.02	)
Net income attributable to CB Richard Ellis Group, Inc.						$	0.19	$	0.17		$	0.30	$	0.15

Weighted average shares outstanding for diluted income (loss) per share		322,920,829		312,879,640
Weighted average shares outstanding for diluted income per share							324,093,042		318,425,227			323,510,069		317,736,844

Amounts attributable to CB Richard Ellis Group, Inc. shareholders
Income (loss) from continuing operations, net of tax	$	34,369	$	(6,627	)
Discontinued operations, net of tax		—		—
Income from continuing operations, net of tax						$	61,223	$	47,279		$	95,592	$	40,652
Income from discontinued operations, net of tax							—		7,511			—		7,511

Net income (loss)	$	34,369	$	(6,627	)
Net income						$	61,223	$	54,790		$	95,592	$	48,163

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.


	Three Months Ended March 31,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2011			2010			2011			2010
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net income (loss)	$	44,486		$	(16,187	)
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash (used in) provided by operating activities:
Net income							$	119,353		$	28,499
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash (used in) provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization		23,469			26,295			49,088			54,079
Amortization of financing costs		1,751			2,817			3,241			5,325
Gain on sale of loans, servicing rights and other assets		(11,815	)		(7,347	)		(25,437	)		(20,343	)
Gain on disposition of real estate held for investment		(13,094	)		—			(19,695	)		(11,879	)
Equity (income) loss from unconsolidated subsidiaries		(15,179	)		6,584
Equity income from unconsolidated subsidiaries								(32,247	)		(7,651	)
Provision for doubtful accounts		1,440			3,564			6,830			12,421
Compensation expense related to stock options and non-vested stock awards		10,619			10,787			21,292			22,018
Incremental tax benefit from stock options exercised		(10,487	)		(279	)		(14,495	)		(236	)
Distribution of earnings from unconsolidated subsidiaries		5,833			4,483			11,855			11,793
Tenant concessions received		587			1,773			11,807			3,424
Decrease in receivables		89,002			43,598			4,131			4,961
Decrease in prepaid expenses and other assets		6,106			14,450
(Increase) decrease in prepaid expenses and other assets								(4,523	)		4,352
Decrease (increase) in real estate held for sale and under development		4,364			(4,112	)		32,525			(10,868	)
Decrease in accounts payable and accrued expenses		(25,406	)		(20,990	)		(34,955	)		(23,737	)
Decrease in compensation and employee benefits payable and accrued bonus and profit sharing		(198,356	)		(69,391	)		(256,597	)		(83,708	)
(Increase) decrease in income taxes receivable		(31,671	)		11,816			(28,245	)		113,243
Increase in other liabilities		4,374			274
Increase (decrease) in other liabilities								400			(601	)
Other operating activities, net		95			(1,044	)		(718	)		(85	)

Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities		(113,882	)		7,091			(156,390	)		101,007

CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Capital expenditures		(13,622	)		(2,898	)		(47,148	)		(7,161	)
Acquisition of businesses including net assets acquired, intangibles and goodwill		(244	)		(3,765	)
Acquisition of businesses, including net assets acquired, intangibles and goodwill, net of cash acquired								(41,075	)		(62,720	)
Contributions to unconsolidated subsidiaries		(7,680	)		(6,326	)		(17,094	)		(10,852	)
Distributions from unconsolidated subsidiaries		11,168			65			34,988			16,130
Net proceeds from disposition of real estate held for investment		66,748			1,845			109,667			57,249
Additions to real estate held for investment		(1,488	)		(4,229	)		(6,315	)		(5,212	)
Proceeds from the sale of servicing rights and other assets		5,207			3,346			11,416			9,741
Decrease in restricted cash		5,984			8,088			3,974			7,804
Other investing activities, net		(752	)		(974	)		(704	)		(954	)

Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities		65,321			(4,848	)
Net cash provided by investing activities								47,709			4,025

CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Proceeds from senior secured term loans								400,000			—
Repayment of senior secured term loans		(9,500	)		(54,816	)		(19,000	)		(60,770	)
Proceeds from revolving credit facility		230,000			3,740			744,733			16,349
Repayment of revolving credit facility		(187,000	)		(4,040	)		(652,000	)		(10,496	)
Proceeds from notes payable on real estate held for investment		1,209			3,940			3,551			8,741
Repayment of notes payable on real estate held for investment		(53,237	)		(10,142	)		(91,471	)		(48,493	)
Proceeds from notes payable on real estate held for sale and under development		549			1,798			1,665			3,214
Repayment of notes payable on real estate held for sale and under development		(6,090	)		(637	)		(26,594	)		(3,412	)
Proceeds from short-term borrowings and other loans, net		—			7,498
Repayment of short-term borrowings and other loans, net								—			(4,047	)
Proceeds from exercise of stock options								4,858			312
Incremental tax benefit from stock options exercised		10,487			279			14,495			236
Non-controlling interests contributions		208			2,980			8,630			22,103
Non-controlling interests distributions		(14,188	)		(555	)		(30,679	)		(6,954	)
Payment of financing costs		(14,172	)		(4,357	)		(18,454	)		(5,707	)
Other financing activities, net		2,570			88			(91	)		(217	)

Net cash used in financing activities		(39,164	)		(54,224	)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities								339,643			(89,141	)
Effect of currency exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents		8,796			(9,281	)		14,573			(13,885	)

NET DECREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS		(78,929	)		(61,262	)
NET INCREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS								245,535			2,006
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, AT BEGINNING OF PERIOD		506,574			741,557			506,574			741,557

CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, AT END OF PERIOD	$	427,645		$	680,295		$	752,109		$	743,563

SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION:
Cash paid (received) during the period for:
Interest	$	12,757		$	29,602		$	68,221		$	85,408

Income tax payments (refunds), net	$	54,130		$	(5,094	)	$	95,744		$	(77,047	)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.


	CB Richard Ellis Group, Inc. Shareholders															CB Richard Ellis Group, Inc. Shareholders
	Class A common stock		Additional paid-in capital		Accumulated earnings		Accumulated other comprehensive loss			Non-controlling interests			Total			Class A common stock		Additional paid-in capital		Accumulated earnings		Accumulated other comprehensive loss			Non-controlling interests			Total
Balance at December 31, 2010	$	3,236	$	814,244	$	185,337	$	(94,602	)	$	157,580		$	1,065,795		$	3,236	$	814,244	$	185,337	$	(94,602	)	$	157,580		$	1,065,795
Net income		—		—		34,369		—			10,117			44,486			—		—		95,592		—			23,761			119,353
Stock options exercised (including tax benefit)		10		13,086		—		—			—			13,096			14		19,339		—		—			—			19,353
Compensation expense for stock options and non-vested stock awards		—		10,619		—		—			—			10,619			—		21,292		—		—			—			21,292
Foreign currency translation gain		—		—		—		29,637			358			29,995			—		—		—		44,715			830			45,545
Unrealized gains on interest rate swaps and interest rate caps, net of tax		—		—		—		1,056			—			1,056
Unrealized losses on interest rate swaps and interest rate caps, net																	—		—		—		(6,777	)		—			(6,777	)
Contributions from non-controlling interests		—		—		—		—			208			208			—		—		—		—			8,630			8,630
Distributions to non-controlling interests		—		—		—		—			(14,188	)		(14,188	)		—		—		—		—			(30,679	)		(30,679	)
Other		1		9		—		(492	)		(1,440	)		(1,922	)
Other, net																	—		108		—		506			(3,468	)		(2,854	)

Balance at March 31, 2011	$	3,247	$	837,958	$	219,706	$	(64,401	)	$	152,635		$	1,149,145
Balance at June 30, 2011																$	3,250	$	854,983	$	280,929	$	(56,158	)	$	156,654		$	1,239,658

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

The accompanying consolidated financial statements of CB Richard Ellis Group, Inc. (which may be referred to in these financial statements as the “company”, “we”, “us” and “our”) have been prepared in accordance with the rules applicable to Form 10-Q and include all information and footnotes required for interim financial statement presentation, but do not include all disclosures required under accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (GAAP) for annual financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring adjustments, except as otherwise noted) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions about future events. These estimates and the underlying assumptions affect the amounts of assets and liabilities reported, and reported amounts of revenue and expenses. Such estimates include the value of real estate assets, accounts receivable, investments in unconsolidated subsidiaries and assumptions used in the calculation of income taxes, retirement and other post-employment benefits, among others. These estimates and assumptions are based on management’s best judgment. Management evaluates its estimates and assumptions on an ongoing basis using historical experience and other factors, including consideration of the current economic environment, and adjusts such estimates and assumptions when facts and circumstances dictate. As future events and their effects cannot be determined with precision, actual results could differ significantly from these estimates. Changes in these estimates resulting from continuing changes in the economic environment will be reflected in the financial statements in future periods.

The results of operations for the three and six months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2011 are not necessarily indicative of the results of operations to be expected for the year ending December 31, 2011. The consolidated financial statements and notes to consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010, which contains the latest available audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto, which are as of and for the year ended December 31, 2010.

In ~~January~~December 2010, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) ~~2010-06, “~~~~Improving Disclosures about Fair Value Measurements~~,” which provides amendments to the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) Subtopic 820-10 that require new disclosures regarding (i) transfers in and out of Level 1 and Level 2 fair value measurements and (ii) activity in Level 3 fair value measurements. ASU 2010-06 also clarifies existing disclosures regarding (i) the level of asset and liability disaggregation and (ii) fair value measurement inputs and valuation techniques. As required, in 2010, we adopted the new disclosures and clarifications of existing disclosure requirements, except for the disclosures about purchases, sales, issuances and settlements in the roll forward of activity in Level 3 fair value measurements, which became effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2010, and for interim periods within those fiscal years. The complete adoption of ASU 2010-06 did not have a material impact on the disclosure requirements for our consolidated financial statements.

~~In December 2010, the FASB issued ASU~~ 2010-29, “Business Combinations (Topic 805), Disclosure of Supplementary Pro Forma Information for Business Combinations.” ASU 2010-29 specifies that when a public company completes a business combination, the company should disclose revenue and earnings of the combined entity as though the business combination occurred as of the beginning of the comparable prior annual reporting period. The update also expands the supplemental pro forma disclosures under Topic 805 to include a description of the nature and amount of material, non-recurring pro forma adjustments directly attributable to the business combination included in the pro forma revenue and earnings. The requirements of ASU 2010-29 ~~will be~~are effective for business combinations that occur on or after the beginning of the first annual reporting period beginning on or

after December 15, 2010. We do not believe the adoption of this update will have a material impact on the disclosure requirements for our consolidated financial statements.

In April 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-03, “Transfers and Servicing (Topic 860), Reconsideration of Effective Control for Repurchase Agreements.” ASU 2011-03 specifies when an entity may or may not recognize a sale upon the transfer of financial assets subject to repurchase agreements. That determination is based, in part, on whether the entity has maintained effective control over the transferred financial assets. The requirements of ASU 2011-03 will be effective for the first interim or annual period beginning on or after December 15, 2011, with early adoption prohibited. We do not believe the adoption of this update will have a material effect on our consolidated financial position or results of operations.

In May 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-04, “Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820), Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP and IFRSs.” These amendments were issued to provide a consistent definition of fair value and ensure that the fair value measurement and disclosure requirements are similar between GAAP and International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS). ASU 2011-04 changes certain fair value measurement principles and enhances the disclosure requirements, particularly for level 3 fair value measurements. This ASU is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2011, with early adoption prohibited. We are currently evaluating the impact of adoption of this update on our consolidated financial statements, but do not expect it to have a material impact.

In June 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-05, “Comprehensive Income (Topic 220), Presentation of Comprehensive Income.” This ASU eliminates the option to report other comprehensive income and its components in the statement of changes in stockholders’ equity and requires an entity to present the total of comprehensive income, the components of net income and the components of other comprehensive income either in a single continuous statement or in two separate but consecutive statements. ASU 2011-05 is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2011, with early adoption permitted, and will require retrospective application for all periods presented. We do not believe the adoption of this update will have a material impact on the disclosure requirements for our consolidated financial statements.

On February 15, 2011, we announced that we had entered into definitive agreements to acquire the majority of the real estate investment management business of Netherlands-based ING Group N.V. (ING) for approximately $940 million in cash. The acquisitions include substantially all of the ING Real Estate Investment Management (REIM) operations in Europe and Asia, as well as substantially all of Clarion Real Estate Securities (CRES), its U.S.-based global real estate listed securities business (collectively referred to as ING REIM). On February 15, 2011, we also announced that we expected to acquire approximately $55 million of CRES co-investments from ING and potentially additional interests in other funds managed by ING REIM Europe and ING REIM Asia. Upon completion of the acquisitions (which we refer to as the REIM Acquisitions), ING REIM is expected to become part of our Global Investment Management segment (which conducts business through our indirect wholly-owned subsidiary, CBRE Investors), which will continue to be an independently operated business segment upon completion of the acquisitions. ~~We also expect to acquire approximately $55 million of CRES co-investments from ING and potentially additional interests in other funds managed by ING REIM Europe and ING REIM Asia.~~ In addition, we expect to incur transaction costs relating to the acquisitions of approximately $150 million (pre-tax), including financing, retention and integration costs. ~~These acquisitions, which we refer~~We secured borrowings of $800.0 million of new term loans to asfinance the REIM Acquisitions ~~are~~(see Note 9). Of this amount, $400.0 million was drawn on June 30, 2011 to finance the CRES portion of the REIM Acquisitions, which closed on July 1, 2011 (see Note 17). The acquisition of ING REIM’s operations in Europe and Asia is expected to close in the second half of 2011 and ~~are~~is subject to approval by certain stakeholders, including regulatory agencies in ~~the United States (U.S.),~~ Europe and Asia. We anticipate financing the acquisition of ING REIM’s operations in Europe and Asia primarily with the remaining $400.0 million of new term loans we have secured and ~~plan to borrow $800.0 million of new delayed-draw term loans, which we anticipate using, along with~~ cash on ~~hand, to finance the acquisitions (see Note 9).~~hand.

The “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures” Topic of the FASB ASC (Topic 820) defines fair value as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. Topic 820 also establishes a three-level fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs used to measure fair value. This hierarchy requires entities to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs. The three levels of inputs used to measure fair value are as follows:

There were no significant non-recurring fair value measurements recorded during the three and six months ended ~~March 31, 2011.~~June 30, 2011 or the three months ended June 30, 2010. The following non-recurring fair value measurements were recorded during the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2010 (dollars in thousands):

During the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2010, we recorded investment write-downs of $6.9 million, of which $2.5 million were attributable to non-controlling interests. Such write-downs were included in equity loss from unconsolidated subsidiaries within our Global Investment Management segment in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations. During the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2010, $5.9 million of the investment write-downs were driven by a decrease in the estimated holding period of certain assets and $1.0 million was driven by a decline in value of an investment attributable to continued capital market disruption. When we performed our impairment analysis, the assumptions utilized reflected our outlook for the commercial real estate industry and the impact on our business. This outlook incorporated our belief that market conditions deteriorated and that these challenging conditions could persist for some time.

We do not have any material assets or liabilities that are required to be recorded at fair value on a recurring basis.

Topic 820 also requires disclosure of fair value information about financial instruments, whether or not recognized in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets, as follows:

Cash and Cash Equivalents and Restricted Cash: These balances include cash and cash equivalents as well as restricted cash with maturities of less than three months. The carrying amount approximates fair value due to the short-term maturities of these instruments.

Receivables, less Allowance for Doubtful Accounts:Due to their short-term nature, fair value approximates carrying value.

Warehouse Receivables:Due to their short-term nature, fair value approximates carrying value. Fair value is determined based on the terms and conditions of funded mortgage loans and generally reflects the values of the warehouse lines of credit outstanding for our wholly-owned subsidiary, CBRE Capital Markets.

Available for Sale Securities:These investments are carried at their fair value.

Short-Term Borrowings: The majority of this balance represents our warehouse lines of credit outstanding for CBRE Capital Markets and our revolving credit facility. Due to the short-term nature and variable interest rates of these instruments, fair value approximates carrying value.

Senior Secured Term Loans: Based upon information from third-party banks, the estimated fair value of our senior secured term loans was approximately ~~$632.7 million~~$1.0 billion at ~~March 31, 2011. Their~~June 30, 2011, which approximates their actual carrying value ~~totaled $631.0 million~~ at ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2011 (see Note 9).

11.625% Senior Subordinated Notes: Based on dealers’ quotes, the estimated fair value of our 11.625% senior subordinated notes was ~~$516.8~~$509.0 million at ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2011. Their actual carrying value totaled ~~$438.0~~$438.3 million at ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2011.

6.625% Senior Notes: Based on dealers’ quotes, the estimated fair value of our 6.625% senior notes was ~~$364.0~~$359.6 million at ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2011. Their actual carrying value totaled $350.0 million at ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2011.

Notes Payable on Real Estate: As of ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2011, the carrying value of our notes payable on real estate was ~~$571.4~~$520.0 million (see Note 8). These borrowings mostly have floating interest rates at spreads over a market rate index. It is likely that some portion of our notes payable on real estate have fair values lower than actual carrying values. Given our volume of notes payable and the cost involved in estimating their fair value, we determined it was not practicable to ~~do so.~~determine an estimated fair value for these notes payable. Additionally, only $13.6 million of these notes payable are recourse to us as of ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2011.

Investments in unconsolidated subsidiaries are accounted for under the equity method of accounting. Combined condensed financial information for these entities is as follows (dollars in thousands):


	Three Months Ended March 31,						Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2011			2010			2011			2010			2011			2010
Global Investment Management:
Revenue	$	140,252		$	166,234		$	158,903		$	109,590		$	299,155		$	275,824
Operating loss	$	(34,662	)	$	(262,999	)	$	(8,636	)	$	(92,723	)	$	(43,298	)	$	(355,722	)
Net loss	$	(50,165	)	$	(334,826	)	$	(20,102	)	$	(113,824	)	$	(70,267	)	$	(448,650	)

Development Services:
Revenue	$	19,414		$	20,936		$	28,167		$	31,625		$	47,581		$	52,561
Operating income (loss)	$	39,373		$	(2,670	)
Net income (loss)	$	32,442		$	(11,572	)
Operating income							$	37,424		$	37,739		$	76,797		$	35,069
Net income							$	26,689		$	25,036		$	59,131		$	13,464

Other:
Revenue	$	34,385		$	29,146		$	32,417		$	31,748		$	66,802		$	60,894
Operating income	$	3,790		$	2,746		$	4,643		$	4,758		$	8,433		$	7,504
Net income	$	3,859		$	2,858		$	4,640		$	4,917		$	8,499		$	7,775

Total:
Revenue	$	194,051		$	216,316		$	219,487		$	172,963		$	413,538		$	389,279
Operating income (loss)	$	8,501		$	(262,923	)	$	33,431		$	(50,226	)	$	41,932		$	(313,149	)
Net loss	$	(13,864	)	$	(343,540	)
Net income (loss)							$	11,227		$	(83,871	)	$	(2,637	)	$	(427,411	)

During the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2010, we recorded non-cash write-downs of investments of $6.9 million within our Global Investment Management segment (see Note 4).

Our Global Investment Management segment involves investing our own capital in certain real estate investments with clients. We have provided investment management, property management, brokerage and other professional services in connection with these real estate investments on an arm’s length basis and earned revenues from these unconsolidated subsidiaries. We have also provided development, property management and brokerage services to certain of our unconsolidated subsidiaries in our Development Services segment on an arm’s length basis and earned revenues from these unconsolidated subsidiaries.

Real estate and other assets held for sale include completed real estate projects or land for sale in their present condition that have met all of the “held for sale” criteria of the “Property, Plant and Equipment” Topic of the FASB ASC (Topic 360) and other assets directly related to such projects. Liabilities related to real estate and other assets held for sale have been included as a single line item in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.

Real estate and other assets held for sale and related liabilities were as follows (dollars in thousands):


	March 31, 2011		December 31, 2010		June 30, 2011		December 31, 2010
Assets:
Real estate held for sale (see Note 7)	$	6,255	$	15,399	$	558	$	15,399
Other current assets		—		20		—		20
Property and equipment, net		—		869		—		869
Other assets		—		7		—		7

Total real estate and other assets held for sale		6,255		16,295		558		16,295
Liabilities:
Notes payable on real estate held for sale (see Note 8)		5,560		11,650		—		11,650
Accounts payable and accrued expenses		171		370		46		370
Other current liabilities		—		28		—		28
Other liabilities		102		104		—		104

Total liabilities related to real estate and other assets held for sale		5,833		12,152		46		12,152

Net real estate and other assets held for sale	$	422	$	4,143	$	512	$	4,143

We provide build-to-suit services for our clients and also develop or purchase certain projects which we intend to sell to institutional investors upon project completion or redevelopment. Therefore, we have ownership of real estate until such projects are sold or otherwise disposed. Additionally, ~~effective January 1, 2010,~~ we ~~adopted ASU 2009-17 and began consolidating~~consolidate certain variable interest entities that hold investments in real estate. Certain real estate assets secure the outstanding balances of underlying mortgage or construction loans. Our real estate is reported in our Development Services and Global Investment Management segments and consisted of the following (dollars in thousands):


	March 31, 2011		December 31, 2010		June 30, 2011		December 31, 2010
Real estate under development (current)	$	27,324	$	—
Real estate included in assets held for sale (see Note 6)		6,255		15,399	$	558	$	15,399
Real estate under development (non-current)		87,845		112,819		90,469		112,819
Real estate held for investment (1)		572,250		626,395		539,920		626,395

Total real estate (2)	$	693,674	$	754,613	$	630,947	$	754,613

We had loans secured by real estate, which consisted of the following (dollars in thousands):


	March 31, 2011		December 31, 2010		June 30, 2011		December 31, 2010
Current portion of notes payable on real estate	$	138,635	$	154,213	$	153,598	$	154,213
Notes payable on real estate included in liabilities related to real estate and other assets held for sale (see Note 6)		5,560		11,650		—		11,650

Total notes payable on real estate, current portion		144,195		165,863		153,598		165,863
Notes payable on real estate, non-current portion		427,245		461,665		366,353		461,665

Total notes payable on real estate	$	571,440	$	627,528	$	519,951	$	627,528

At ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, ~~$11.3~~$11.5 million and $1.4 million, respectively, of the non-current portion of notes payable on real estate and $2.1 million and $2.3 million, respectively, of the current portion of notes payable on real estate were recourse to us, beyond being recourse to the single-purpose entity that held the real estate asset and was the primary obligor on the note payable.

Since 2001, we have maintained credit facilities with Credit Suisse Group AG (CS) and other lenders to fund strategic acquisitions and to provide for our working capital needs. On November 10, 2010, we entered into a new credit agreement (as amended, the Credit Agreement) with a syndicate of banks led by CS, as administrative and collateral agent, to completely refinance our previous credit facilities. On March 4, 2011, we entered into an amendment to our ~~credit agreement~~Credit Agreement to, among other things, increase flexibility to various covenants to accommodate the REIM Acquisitions and to maintain the availability of the $800.0 million incremental facility under the Credit Agreement. On March 4, 2011, we also entered into an incremental assumption agreement to allow for the establishment of new tranche C and tranche D term loan facilities.

As of ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2011, our Credit Agreement provides for the following: (1) a $700.0 million revolving credit facility, including revolving credit loans, letters of credit and a swingline loan facility, maturing on May 10, 2015; (2) a $350.0 million tranche A term loan facility requiring quarterly principal payments, ~~beginning~~which began on December 31, 2010 and ~~continuing~~continue through September 30, 2015, with the balance payable on November 10, 2015, (3) a $300.0 million tranche B term loan facility requiring quarterly principal payments, ~~beginning~~which began on December 31, 2010 and ~~continuing~~continue through September 30, 2016, with the balance payable on November 10, 2016; (4) a $400.0 million delayed draw seven year tranche C term loan facility with a maturity date of March 4, 2018; (5) a $400.0 million ~~delayed draw eight and one-half year~~ tranche D term loan facility requiring quarterly principal payments beginning September 30, 2011 and continuing through June 30, 2019, with ~~a maturity date of~~the balance payable on September 4, 2019 and (6) an accordion provision which provides the ability to borrow an additional $800.0 million, which can be further expanded, subject to the satisfaction of what we believe are customary conditions. In regards to the tranche C and tranche D term loan facilities, we have up to 180 days from the date we entered into the incremental assumption agreement to draw on these facilities during which period we are required to pay a fee on the unused portions of each facility. After 180 days, any unused portions of these facilities would no longer be available for use. On June 30, 2011, we drew down $400.0 million of the tranche D term loan facility to finance the CRES portion of the REIM Acquisitions, which closed on July 1, 2011 (see Note 17). The acquisition of ING REIM’s operations in Europe and Asia is expected to close in the second half of 2011 and we anticipate financing it primarily with the entire $400.0 million of tranche C term loan facility and cash on hand.

The revolving credit facility allows for borrowings outside of the ~~U.S.~~United States (U.S.), with sub-facilities of $5.0 million available to one of our Canadian subsidiaries, $35.0 million in aggregate available to one of our Australian and one of our New Zealand subsidiaries and $50.0 million available to one of our ~~U.K.~~United Kingdom (U.K.) subsidiaries. Additionally, outstanding borrowings under these sub-facilities may be up to 5.0% higher as allowed under the currency fluctuation provision in the Credit Agreement. Borrowings under the revolving credit facility as of ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2011 bear interest at varying rates, based at our option, on either the applicable fixed rate plus 1.65% to 3.15% or the daily rate plus 0.65% to 2.15% as determined by reference to our ratio of total debt less available cash to EBITDA (as defined in the Credit Agreement). As of ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, we had ~~$60.7~~$111.2 million and $17.5 million, respectively, of revolving credit facility principal outstanding with related weighted average interest rates of ~~3.7%~~4.4% and 3.5%, respectively, which are included in short-term borrowings in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. As of ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2011, letters of credit totaling ~~$20.0~~$13.6 million were outstanding under the revolving credit facility. These letters of credit were primarily issued in the normal course of business as well as in connection with certain insurance programs and reduce the amount we may borrow under the revolving credit facility.

Borrowings under the term loan facilities as of ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2011 bear interest, based at our option, on the following: for the tranche A term loan facility, on either the applicable fixed rate plus 2.00% to 3.75% or the daily rate plus 1.00% to 2.75%, as determined by reference to our ratio of total debt less available cash to EBITDA (as defined in the Credit Agreement), for the tranche B term loan facility, on either the applicable fixed rate plus 3.25% or the daily rate plus 2.25%, for the tranche C term loan facility, on either the applicable fixed rate plus 3.25% or the daily rate plus 2.25% and for the tranche D term loan facility, on either the applicable fixed rate plus 3.50% or the daily rate plus 2.50%. As of ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, we had ~~$332.5~~$323.8 million and $341.3 million, respectively, of tranche A term loan facility principal outstanding and ~~$298.5~~$297.7 million and $299.2 million, respectively, of tranche B term loan facility principal outstanding, which are included in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. As of ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2011, ~~and December 31, 2010,~~we also had $400.0 million of tranche D term loan facility principal outstanding, which is included in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. As of June 30, 2011, there were no amounts outstanding under our tranche C ~~and tranche D~~ term loan ~~facilities.~~facility.

In March 2011, we entered into five interest rate swap agreements, all with effective dates in October 2011, and immediately designated them as cash flow hedges in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 815, “Derivatives and Hedging.” The purpose of these interest rate swap agreements is to hedge potential changes to our cash flows due to the variable interest nature of our senior secured term loan facilities. The total notional amount of these interest rate swap agreements is $400.0 million, with $200.0 million expiring on October 2, 2017 and $200.0 million expiring on September 4, 2019. There was no hedge ineffectiveness for the three and six months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2011. During the three and six months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2011, we recorded a net ~~gain~~losses of ~~$1.7~~$13.2 million and $11.5 million, respectively, to other comprehensive ~~income~~loss in relation to these interest rate swap agreements. As of ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2011, the fair values of ~~four~~these interest rate swap agreements were reflected as ~~a $2.0 million asset and were included in other long-term assets in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. The fifth interest rate swap agreement was reflected as a $0.3~~an $11.5 million liability and ~~was~~were included in other long-term liabilities in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. The fair value measurements employed for these interest rate swap agreements were based on observable market data, which falls within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.

The Credit Agreement is jointly and severally guaranteed by us and substantially all of our domestic subsidiaries. Borrowings under our Credit Agreement are secured by a pledge of substantially all of the capital stock of our U.S. subsidiaries and ~~65%~~65.0% of the capital stock of certain non-U.S. subsidiaries. Also, the Credit Agreement requires us to pay a fee based on the total amount of the revolving credit facility commitment.

additional indebtedness, pay dividends or make distributions to stockholders, repurchase capital stock or debt, make investments, sell assets or subsidiary stock, create or permit liens on assets, engage in transactions with affiliates, enter into sale/leaseback transactions, issue subsidiary equity and enter into consolidations or mergers. Our Credit Agreement also currently requires us to maintain a minimum coverage ratio of EBITDA (as defined in the Credit Agreement) to total interest expense of 2.25x and a maximum leverage ratio of total debt less available cash to EBITDA (as defined in the Credit Agreement) of 3.75x. Our coverage ratio of EBITDA to total interest expense was ~~10.1x~~13.58x for the trailing twelve months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2011 and our leverage ratio of total debt less available cash to EBITDA was ~~1.07x~~1.25x as of ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2011.

On April 19, 2010, we entered into a Receivables Purchase Agreement, which allowed us to transfer an undivided interest in a designated pool of U.S. accounts receivable, on an ongoing basis, to provide collateral for borrowings up to a maximum of $55.0 million. Borrowings under this arrangement generally bore interest at the commercial paper rate plus 2.75%. This agreement expired on April 18, 2011 and we did not renew this arrangement. As of ~~March 31, 2011 and~~ December 31, 2010, there were no amounts outstanding under this agreement.

We are a party to a number of pending or threatened lawsuits arising out of, or incident to, the ordinary course of our business. Our management believes that any liability imposed on us that may result from disposition of these lawsuits will not have a material effect on our business, consolidated financial position, cash flows or results of operations.

We had outstanding letters of credit totaling ~~$19.7~~$13.3 million as of ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2011, excluding letters of credit for which we have outstanding liabilities already accrued on our consolidated balance sheet related to our subsidiaries’ outstanding reserves for claims under certain insurance programs as well as letters of credit related to operating leases. These letters of credit are primarily executed by us in the ordinary course of business as well as in connection with certain insurance programs. The letters of credit expire at varying dates through ~~May~~July 2012.

We had guarantees totaling ~~$10.8~~$13.7 million as of ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2011, excluding guarantees related to pension liabilities, consolidated indebtedness and other obligations for which we have outstanding liabilities already accrued on our consolidated balance sheet, and operating leases. The ~~$10.8~~$13.7 million primarily consists of guarantees of obligations of unconsolidated subsidiaries, which expire at varying dates through November 2013.

In addition, as of ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2011, we had numerous completion and budget guarantees relating to development projects. These guarantees are made by us in the ordinary course of our Development Services business. Each of these guarantees requires us to complete construction of the relevant project within a specified timeframe and/or within a specified budget, with us potentially being liable for costs to complete in excess of such timeframe or budget. However, we generally have “guaranteed maximum price” contracts with reputable general contractors with respect to projects for which we provide these guarantees. These contracts are intended to pass the risk to such contractors. While there can be no assurance, we do not expect to incur any material losses under these guarantees.

we would generally look to the subcontractor that performed the work to remedy the defect and also look to insurance policies that cover this work. While there can be no assurance, we do not expect to incur material losses with respect to construction defects.

In January 2008, CBRE Multifamily Capital, Inc. (CBRE MCI), a wholly-owned subsidiary of CBRE Capital Markets, Inc., entered into an agreement with Fannie Mae, under Fannie Mae’s DUS Lender Program (DUS Program), to provide financing for multifamily housing with five or more units. Under the DUS Program, CBRE MCI originates, underwrites, closes and services loans without prior approval by Fannie Mae, and in selected cases, is subject to sharing up to one-third of any losses on loans originated under the DUS Program. CBRE MCI has funded loans subject to such loss sharing arrangements with unpaid principal balances of ~~$2.3~~$2.5 billion at ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2011. Additionally, CBRE MCI has funded loans under the DUS Program that are not subject to loss sharing arrangements with unpaid principal balances of approximately ~~$464.7~~$522.7 million at ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2011. CBRE MCI, under its agreement with Fannie Mae, must post cash reserves under formulas established by Fannie Mae to provide for sufficient capital in the event losses occur. As of ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, CBRE MCI had ~~$2.6~~$3.3 million and $2.2 million, respectively, of cash deposited under this reserve arrangement, and had provided approximately ~~$4.4~~$4.7 million and $4.0 million, respectively, of loan loss accruals. Fannie Mae’s recourse under the DUS Program is limited to the assets of CBRE MCI, which totaled approximately ~~$195.0~~$104.3 million (including ~~$138.0~~$46.6 million of warehouse receivables, a substantial majority of which are pledged against warehouse lines of credit and are therefore not available to Fannie Mae) at ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2011.

Additionally, an important part of our Development Services business strategy is to invest in unconsolidated real estate subsidiaries as a principal (in most cases co-investing with our clients). As of ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2011, we had committed to fund ~~$22.2~~$21.4 million of additional capital to these unconsolidated subsidiaries.

The following is a calculation of income per share (dollars in thousands, except share data):

~~The following is a calculation of income (loss) per share (dollars in thousands, except share data):~~

For the three and six months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2011, options to purchase ~~51,523~~55,587 shares of common stock were excluded from the computation of diluted earnings per share because their inclusion would have had an anti-dilutive effect.

For the three and six months ended March 31, 2010, all contingently issuable shares and stock options were anti-dilutive since we reported a net loss for the period. As a result, basic and diluted loss per share was the same for the three months ended March 31, 2010.

~~Had we reported net income for the three months ended March 31,~~June 30, 2010, options to purchase ~~4,497,203~~838,830 shares of common stock ~~would have been included in the computation of diluted earnings per share, while options to purchase 2,984,430 shares of common stock would have been~~were excluded from the computation of diluted earnings per share asbecause their inclusion would have had an anti-dilutive effect. Additionally, ~~had we reported net income for the three months ended March 31, 2010, 9,789,081~~398,047 and 397,577 of contingently issuable shares ~~would have been included in the computation of diluted earnings per share, while 947,439 of contingently issuable shares would have been~~were excluded from the computation of diluted earnings per share asbecause their inclusion would have had an anti-dilutive ~~effect.~~

The following table provides a summary of comprehensive income (loss) (dollars in thousands):


	Three Months Ended March 31,						Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2011			2010			2011			2010			2011			2010
Net income (loss)	$	44,486		$	(16,187	)
Net income							$	74,867		$	44,686		$	119,353		$	28,499
Other comprehensive income (loss):
Foreign currency translation gain (loss)		29,995			(24,126	)		15,550			(36,468	)		45,545			(60,594	)
Unrealized gains on interest rate swaps and interest rate caps, net		1,056			122
Unrealized (losses) gains on interest rate swaps and interest rate caps, net								(7,833	)		174			(6,777	)		296
Other, net		(492	)		2,288			998			(75	)		506			2,213

Total other comprehensive income (loss)		30,559			(21,716	)		8,715			(36,369	)		39,274			(58,085	)

Comprehensive income (loss)		75,045			(37,903	)		83,582			8,317			158,627			(29,586	)
Less: Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to non-controlling interests		10,475			(9,920	)		14,116			(10,468	)		24,591			(20,388	)

Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to CB Richard Ellis Group, Inc.	$	64,570		$	(27,983	)	$	69,466		$	18,785		$	134,036		$	(9,198	)

We have two contributory defined benefit pension plans in the ~~United Kingdom (U.K.)~~U.K., which we acquired in connection with previous acquisitions. Our subsidiaries based in the U.K. maintain the plans to provide retirement benefits to existing and former employees participating in these plans. During 2007, we reached agreements with the active members of these plans to freeze future pension plan benefits. In return, the active members became eligible to enroll in the CBRE Group Personal Pension Plan, a defined contribution plan in the U.K.


	Three Months Ended March 31,						Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2011			2010			2011			2010			2011			2010
Interest cost	$	4,113		$	4,063		$	4,209		$	3,884		$	8,322		$	7,947
Expected return on plan assets		(4,236	)		(3,771	)		(4,337	)		(3,605	)		(8,573	)		(7,376	)
Amortization of unrecognized net loss		337			555			345			530			682			1,085

Net periodic pension cost	$	214		$	847		$	217		$	809		$	431		$	1,656

We contributed $0.9 million and $1.8 million to fund our pension plans during the three and six months ended ~~March 31, 2011.~~June 30, 2011, respectively. We expect to contribute a total of $3.7 million to fund our pension plans for the year ending December 31, 2011.

In the ordinary course of business, we dispose of real estate assets, or hold real estate assets for sale, that may be considered components of an entity in accordance with Topic 360. If we do not have, or expect to have, significant continuing involvement with the operation of these real estate assets after disposition, we are required to recognize operating profits or losses and gains or losses on disposition of these assets as discontinued operations in our consolidated statements of operations in the periods in which they occur. Real estate operations

and dispositions accounted for as discontinued operations for the three and six months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2011 and 2010 were reported in our Global Investment Management ~~segment~~and Development Services segments as follows (dollars in thousands):


			Three Months Ended June 30,					Six Months Ended June 30,
	Three Months Ended March 31, 2011		2011		2010			2011		2010
Revenue	$	1,030	$	1,355	$	978		$	2,385	$	978
Costs and expenses:
Operating, administrative and other		382		852		356			1,234		356
Depreciation and amortization		291		234		168			525		168

Total costs and expenses		673		1,086		524			1,759		524
Gain on disposition of real estate		11,037		6,601		11,879			17,638		11,879

Operating income		11,394		6,870		12,333			18,264		12,333
Interest income				—		1			—		1
Interest expense		750		603		715			1,353		715

Income from discontinued operations, before provision for income taxes		10,644		6,267		11,619			16,911		11,619
Provision for income taxes		—		—		4,479			—		4,479

Income from discontinued operations, net of income taxes		10,644		6,267		7,140			16,911		7,140
Less: Income from discontinued operations attributable to non-controlling interests		10,644
Less: Income (loss) from discontinued operations attributable to non-controlling interests				6,267		(371	)		16,911		(371	)

Income from discontinued operations attributable to CB Richard Ellis Group, Inc.	$	—	$	—	$	7,511		$	—	$	7,511

We report our operations through the following segments: (1) Americas, (2) EMEA, (3) Asia Pacific, (4) Global Investment Management and (5) Development Services.

The Americas segment is our largest segment of operations and provides a comprehensive range of services throughout the U.S. and in the largest regions of Canada and selected parts of Latin America. The primary services offered consist of the following: real estate services, mortgage loan origination and servicing, valuation services, asset services and corporate services.

Our EMEA and Asia Pacific segments provide services similar to the Americas business segment. The EMEA segment has operations primarily in Europe, while the Asia Pacific segment has operations primarily in Asia, Australia and New Zealand.

Our Global Investment Management business provides investment management services to clients seeking to generate returns and diversification through direct and indirect investments in real estate in the U.S., Europe and Asia.

~~Our Development Services business consists of real estate development and investment activities primarily in the U.S.~~

Our Development Services business consists of real estate development and investment activities primarily in the U.S.

Summarized financial information by segment is as follows (dollars in thousands):


	Three Months Ended March 31,					Three Months Ended June 30,				Six Months Ended June 30,
	2011		2010			2011		2010		2011		2010
Revenue
Americas	$	750,115	$	645,611		$	897,828	$	722,255	$	1,647,943	$	1,367,866
EMEA		204,968		188,160			261,087		225,378		466,055		413,538
Asia Pacific		160,500		134,432			188,546		158,678		349,046		293,110
Global Investment Management		50,322		39,407			57,554		46,896		107,876		86,303
Development Services		19,200		18,273			17,203		18,712		36,403		36,985

	$	1,185,105	$	1,025,883		$	1,422,218	$	1,171,919	$	2,607,323	$	2,197,802


						Three Months Ended June 30,				Six Months Ended June 30,
						2011		2010		2011		2010
EBITDA
Americas	$	78,128	$	61,988		$	115,375	$	89,847	$	193,503	$	151,835
EMEA		3,006		4,125			21,375		19,865		24,381		23,990
Asia Pacific		12,442		8,258			17,437		12,777		29,879		21,035
Global Investment Management		5,990		(4,930	)		2,470		10,766		8,460		5,836
Development Services		13,478		5,518			9,438		28,380		22,916		33,898

	$	113,044	$	74,959		$	166,095	$	161,635	$	279,139	$	236,594

EBITDA represents earnings before net interest expense, income taxes, depreciation and amortization. Our management believes EBITDA is useful in evaluating our operating performance compared to that of other companies in our industry because the calculation of EBITDA generally eliminates the effects of financing and income taxes and the accounting effects of capital spending and acquisitions, which would include impairment charges of goodwill and intangibles created from acquisitions. Such items may vary for different companies for reasons unrelated to overall operating performance. As a result, our management uses EBITDA as a measure to evaluate the operating performance of our various business segments and for other discretionary purposes, including as a significant component when measuring our operating performance under our employee incentive programs. Additionally, we believe EBITDA is useful to investors to assist them in getting a more accurate picture of our results from operations.

However, EBITDA is not a recognized measurement under GAAP and when analyzing our operating performance, readers should use EBITDA in addition to, and not as an alternative for, net income as determined in accordance with GAAP. Because not all companies use identical calculations, our presentation of EBITDA may not be comparable to similarly titled measures of other companies. Furthermore, EBITDA is not intended to be a measure of free cash flow for our management’s discretionary use, as it does not consider certain cash requirements such as tax and debt service payments. The amounts shown for EBITDA also differ from the amounts calculated under similarly titled definitions in our debt instruments, which are further adjusted to reflect certain other cash and non-cash charges and are used to determine compliance with financial covenants and our ability to engage in certain activities, such as incurring additional debt and making certain restricted payments.

Net interest expense has been expensed in the segment incurred. Provision for (benefit of) income taxes has been allocated among our segments by using applicable U.S. and foreign effective tax rates. EBITDA for our segments is calculated as follows (dollars in thousands):


	Three Months Ended March 31,						Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2011			2010			2011			2010			2011			2010
Americas
Net income attributable to CB Richard Ellis Group, Inc.	$	29,509		$	2,546		$	52,015		$	35,038		$	81,524		$	37,584
Add:
Depreciation and amortization		12,831			14,690			14,831			14,997			27,662			29,687
Interest expense		25,832			39,714			25,740			38,972			51,572			78,686
Royalty and management service income		(6,620	)		(4,145	)		(6,895	)		(5,347	)		(13,515	)		(9,492	)
Provision for income taxes		18,376			10,369			30,951			7,062			49,327			17,431
Less:
Interest income		1,800			1,186			1,267			875			3,067			2,061

EBITDA	$	78,128		$	61,988		$	115,375		$	89,847		$	193,503		$	151,835

EMEA
Net (loss) income attributable to CB Richard Ellis Group, Inc.	$	(149	)	$	972
Net income attributable to CB Richard Ellis Group, Inc.							$	10,541		$	5,278		$	10,392		$	6,250
Add:
Depreciation and amortization		2,262			2,390			2,253			2,384			4,515			4,774
Interest expense		139			89			18			36			157			125
Royalty and management service expense		2,731			2,212			3,422			3,329			6,153			5,541
Benefit of income taxes		(1,460	)		(1,205	)
Provision for income taxes								5,248			9,189			3,788			7,984
Less:
Interest income		517			333			107			351			624			684

EBITDA	$	3,006		$	4,125		$	21,375		$	19,865		$	24,381		$	23,990

Asia Pacific
Net income attributable to CB Richard Ellis Group, Inc.	$	2,901		$	743		$	6,186		$	5,907		$	9,087		$	6,650
Add:
Depreciation and amortization		1,983			2,112			1,988			2,007			3,971			4,119
Interest expense		420			557			809			613			1,229			1,170
Royalty and management service expense		3,607			1,793			3,239			1,745			6,846			3,538
Provision for income taxes		3,790			3,200			5,745			4,288			9,535			7,488
Less:
Interest income		259			147			530			1,783			789			1,930

EBITDA	$	12,442		$	8,258		$	17,437		$	12,777		$	29,879		$	21,035

Global Investment Management
Net loss attributable to CB Richard Ellis Group, Inc.	$	(2,455	)	$	(8,468	)	$	(9,777	)	$	(1,119	)	$	(12,232	)	$	(9,587	)
Add:
Depreciation and amortization (1)		3,786			2,857			3,405			3,613			7,191			6,470
Interest expense (2)		4,590			4,415			5,688			6,063			10,453			10,478
Royalty and management service expense		282			140			234			273			516			413
Benefit of income taxes		(160	)		(3,762	)
Provision for (benefit of) income taxes								3,093			1,992			2,933			(1,770	)
Less:
Interest income		53			112			173			56			401			168

EBITDA (3)	$	5,990		$	(4,930	)	$	2,470		$	10,766		$	8,460		$	5,836

Development Services
Net income (loss) attributable to CB Richard Ellis Group, Inc.	$	4,563		$	(2,420	)
Net income attributable to CB Richard Ellis Group, Inc.							$	2,258		$	9,686		$	6,821		$	7,266
Add:
Depreciation and amortization		2,607			4,246
Interest expense		3,487			5,017
Provision for (benefit of) income taxes		2,860			(1,303	)
Depreciation and amortization (4)								3,142			4,783			5,749			9,029
Interest expense (5)								2,753			5,306			6,240			10,323
Provision for income taxes (6)								1,299			8,652			4,159			7,349
Less:
Interest income		39			22			14			47			53			69

EBITDA	$	13,478		$	5,518
EBITDA (7)							$	9,438		$	28,380		$	22,916		$	33,898

(1) Condensed consolidating balance sheets as of ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010; condensed consolidating statements of operations for the three and six months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2011 and 2010; and condensed consolidating statements of cash flows for the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2011 and 2010, of (a) CB Richard Ellis Group, Inc. as the parent, (b) CB Richard Ellis Services, Inc. (CBRE) as the subsidiary issuer, (c) the guarantor subsidiaries, (d) the nonguarantor subsidiaries and (e) CB Richard Ellis Group, Inc. on a consolidated basis; and

(2) Elimination entries necessary to consolidate CB Richard Ellis Group, Inc. as the parent, with CBRE and its guarantor and nonguarantor subsidiaries.

Investments in consolidated subsidiaries are presented using the equity method of accounting. The principal elimination entries eliminate investments in consolidated subsidiaries and intercompany balances and transactions.



	Parent		CBRE		Guarantor Subsidiaries		Nonguarantor Subsidiaries		Elimination			Consolidated Total		Parent		CBRE		Guarantor Subsidiaries		Nonguarantor Subsidiaries		Elimination			Consolidated Total
Current Assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	4	$	204,454	$	41,980	$	181,207	$	—		$	427,645	$	66	$	118,592	$	434,546	$	198,905	$	—		$	752,109
Restricted cash		—		4,836		16,818		24,879		—			46,533		—		4,840		16,386		27,995		—			49,221
Receivables, net		—		—		388,809		500,267		—			889,076		—		—		411,097		557,488		—			968,585
Warehouse receivables (a)		—		—		285,673		—		—			285,673		—		—		308,249		—		—			308,249
Income taxes receivable		3,634		10		—		23,389		(121	)		26,912		7,137		450		9,542		19,227		—			36,356
Prepaid expenses		—		3,039		33,441		59,043		—			95,523		—		1,749		40,696		57,806		—			100,251
Deferred tax assets, net		—		—		92,178		28,367		—			120,545		—		—		92,205		20,764		—			112,969
Real estate under development		—		—		—		27,324		—			27,324
Real estate and other assets held for sale		—		—		558		5,697		—			6,255		—		—		558		—		—			558
Other current assets		—		—		28,670		14,877		—			43,547		—		—		31,884		18,872		—			50,756

Total Current Assets		3,638		212,339		888,127		865,050		(121	)		1,969,033		7,203		125,631		1,345,163		901,057		—			2,379,054
Property and equipment, net		—		—		123,461		69,906		—			193,367		—		—		146,730		69,854		—			216,584
Goodwill		—		—		803,075		539,775		—			1,342,850		—		—		804,283		603,260		—			1,407,543
Other intangible assets, net		—		—		303,778		27,980		—			331,758		—		—		306,533		27,407		—			333,940
Investments in unconsolidated subsidiaries		—		—		90,503		56,296		—			146,799		—		—		96,387		48,771		—			145,158
Investments in consolidated subsidiaries		1,256,889		986,937		1,094,369		—		(3,338,195	)		—		1,345,654		1,612,308		1,130,868		—		(4,088,830	)		—
Intercompany loan receivable		—		1,512,535		635,000		210,003		(2,357,538	)		—		—		1,468,486		635,000		103,453		(2,206,939	)		—
Deferred tax assets, net		—		—		—		31,412		(30,398	)		1,014		—		—		—		40,801		(34,501	)		6,300
Real estate under development		—		—		—		87,845		—			87,845		—		—		7,573		82,896		—			90,469
Real estate held for investment		—		—		4,217		568,033		—			572,250		—		—		4,223		535,697		—			539,920
Available for sale securities		—		—		33,081		—		—			33,081		—		—		33,930		—		—			33,930
Other assets, net		—		46,646		26,329		41,926		—			114,901		—		47,593		38,546		43,695		—			129,834

Total Assets	$	1,260,527	$	2,758,457	$	4,001,940	$	2,498,226	$	(5,726,252	)	$	4,792,898	$	1,352,857	$	3,254,018	$	4,549,236	$	2,456,891	$	(6,330,270	)	$	5,282,732

Current Liabilities:
Accounts payable and accrued expenses	$	—	$	28,208	$	132,079	$	269,239	$	—		$	429,526	$	—	$	9,936	$	130,767	$	301,096	$	—		$	441,799
Compensation and employee benefits payable		—		626		201,655		140,435		—			342,716		—		626		200,924		135,512		—			337,062
Accrued bonus and profit sharing		—		—		92,158		179,542		—			271,700		—		—		139,405		85,564		—			224,969
Income taxes payable		—		—		121		—		(121	)		—
Short-term borrowings:
Warehouse lines of credit (a)		—		—		277,676		—		—			277,676		—		—		302,490		—		—			302,490
Revolving credit facility		—		53,444		—		7,246		—			60,690		—		76,449		—		34,771		—			111,220
Other		—		—		16		—		—			16		—		—		16		—		—			16

Total short-term borrowings		—		53,444		277,692		7,246		—			338,382		—		76,449		302,506		34,771		—			413,726
Current maturities of long-term debt		—		38,000		—		55		—			38,055		—		42,000		—		38		—			42,038
Notes payable on real estate		—		—		—		138,635		—			138,635		—		—		—		153,598		—			153,598
Liabilities related to real estate and other assets held for sale		—		—		26		5,807		—			5,833		—		—		46		—		—			46
Other current liabilities		—		—		14,437		2,319		—			16,756		—		—		15,444		2,154		—			17,598

Total Current Liabilities		—		120,278		718,168		743,278		(121	)		1,581,603		—		129,011		789,092		712,733		—			1,630,836
Long-Term Debt:
Senior secured term loans		—		593,000		—		—		—			593,000		—		979,500		—		—		—			979,500
11.625% senior subordinated notes, net		—		438,001		—		—		—			438,001		—		438,329		—		—		—			438,329
6.625% senior notes		—		350,000		—		—		—			350,000		—		350,000		—		—		—			350,000
Other long-term debt		—		—		—		46		—			46		—		—		—		85		—			85
Intercompany loan payable		264,017		—		2,093,521		—		(2,357,538	)		—		269,853		—		1,937,086		—		(2,206,939	)		—

Total Long-Term Debt		264,017		1,381,001		2,093,521		46		(2,357,538	)		1,381,047		269,853		1,767,829		1,937,086		85		(2,206,939	)		1,767,914
Deferred tax liabilities, net		—		—		30,398		—		(30,398	)		—		—		—		34,501		—		(34,501	)		—
Pension liability		—		—		—		40,626		—			40,626		—		—		—		40,061		—			40,061
Non-current tax liabilities		—		—		80,554		—		—			80,554		—		—		81,217		—		—			81,217
Notes payable on real estate		—		—		—		427,245		—			427,245		—		—		—		366,353		—			366,353
Other liabilities		—		289		92,362		40,027		—			132,678		—		11,524		95,032		50,137		—			156,693

Total Liabilities		264,017		1,501,568		3,015,003		1,251,222		(2,388,057	)		3,643,753		269,853		1,908,364		2,936,928		1,169,369		(2,241,440	)		4,043,074
Commitments and contingencies		—		—		—		—		—			—		—		—		—		—		—			—
Equity:
CB Richard Ellis Group, Inc. Stockholders’ Equity		996,510		1,256,889		986,937		1,094,369		(3,338,195	)		996,510		1,083,004		1,345,654		1,612,308		1,130,868		(4,088,830	)		1,083,004
Non-controlling interests		—		—		—		152,635		—			152,635		—		—		—		156,654		—			156,654

Total Equity		996,510		1,256,889		986,937		1,247,004		(3,338,195	)		1,149,145		1,083,004		1,345,654		1,612,308		1,287,522		(4,088,830	)		1,239,658

Total Liabilities and Equity	$	1,260,527	$	2,758,457	$	4,001,940	$	2,498,226	$	(5,726,252	)	$	4,792,898	$	1,352,857	$	3,254,018	$	4,549,236	$	2,456,891	$	(6,330,270	)	$	5,282,732



	Parent			CBRE			Guarantor Subsidiaries			Nonguarantor Subsidiaries			Elimination			Consolidated Total		Parent			CBRE			Guarantor Subsidiaries			Nonguarantor Subsidiaries		Elimination			Consolidated Total
Revenue	$	—		$	—		$	696,135		$	488,970		$	—		$	1,185,105	$	—		$	—		$	834,952		$	587,266	$	—		$	1,422,218
Costs and expenses:
Cost of services		—			—			420,960			292,795			—			713,755		—			—			502,310			337,512		—			839,822
Operating, administrative and other		9,805			187			208,423			158,610			—			377,025		9,437			1,701			231,817			189,901		—			432,856
Depreciation and amortization		—			—			12,285			10,893			—			23,178		—			—	��		14,320			11,065		—			25,385

Total costs and expenses		9,805			187			641,668			462,298			—			1,113,958		9,437			1,701			748,447			538,478		—			1,298,063
Gain on disposition of real estate		—			—			—			1,972			—			1,972		—			—			—			6,027		—			6,027

Operating (loss) income		(9,805	)		(187	)		54,467			28,644			—			73,119		(9,437	)		(1,701	)		86,505			54,815		—			130,182
Equity income (loss) from unconsolidated subsidiaries		—			—			16,448			(1,269	)		—			15,179
Equity income from unconsolidated subsidiaries																			—			—			11,979			5,089		—			17,068
Interest income		—			26,055			841			1,502			(25,730	)		2,668		—			26,492			400			2,039		(27,029	)		1,902
Interest expense		—			25,894			24,494			9,060			(25,730	)		33,718		—			25,979			27,656			7,610		(27,029	)		34,216
Royalty and management service (income) expense		—			—			(8,247	)		8,247			—			—		—			—			(7,988	)		7,988		—			—
Income from consolidated subsidiaries		40,539			40,555			5,430			—			(86,524	)		—		67,158			67,906			15,327			—		(150,391	)		—

Income from continuing operations before (benefit of) provision for income taxes		30,734			40,529			60,939			11,570			(86,524	)		57,248		57,721			66,718			94,543			46,345		(150,391	)		114,936
(Benefit of) provision for income taxes		(3,635	)		(10	)		20,384			6,667			—			23,406		(3,502	)		(440	)		26,637			23,641		—			46,336

Net income from continuing operations		34,369			40,539			40,555			4,903			(86,524	)		33,842		61,223			67,158			67,906			22,704		(150,391	)		68,600
Income from discontinued operations, net of income taxes		—			—			—			10,644			—			10,644		—			—			—			6,267		—			6,267

Net income		34,369			40,539			40,555			15,547			(86,524	)		44,486		61,223			67,158			67,906			28,971		(150,391	)		74,867
Less: Net income attributable to non-controlling interests		—			—			—			10,117			—			10,117		—			—			—			13,644		—			13,644

Net income attributable to CB Richard Ellis Group, Inc.	$	34,369		$	40,539		$	40,555		$	5,430		$	(86,524	)	$	34,369	$	61,223		$	67,158		$	67,906		$	15,327	$	(150,391	)	$	61,223


	Parent			CBRE			Guarantor Subsidiaries			Nonguarantor Subsidiaries			Elimination			Consolidated Total			Parent			CBRE			Guarantor Subsidiaries			Nonguarantor Subsidiaries			Elimination			Consolidated Total
Revenue	$	—		$	—		$	602,434		$	423,449		$	—		$	1,025,883		$	—		$	—		$	670,790		$	501,129		$	—		$	1,171,919
Costs and expenses:
Cost of services		—			—			367,146			248,048			—			615,194			—			—			397,544			281,170			—			678,714
Operating, administrative and other		10,376			363			175,192			152,775			—			338,706			10,734			2,151			189,287			169,861			—			372,033
Depreciation and amortization		—			—			14,217			12,078			—			26,295			—			—			14,517			13,099			—			27,616

Total costs and expenses		10,376			363			556,555			412,901			—			980,195			10,734			2,151			601,348			464,130			—			1,078,363
Gain on disposition of real estate																				—			—			3,313			310			—			3,623

Operating (loss) income		(10,376	)		(363	)		45,879			10,548			—			45,688			(10,734	)		(2,151	)		72,755			37,309			—			97,179
Equity loss from unconsolidated subsidiaries		—			—			(3,591	)		(2,993	)		—			(6,584	)
Equity income from unconsolidated subsidiaries																				—			—			12,398			1,837			—			14,235
Interest income		—			58			860			1,072			(190	)		1,800			—			45			626			2,599			(159	)		3,111
Interest expense		—			40,136			122			9,724			(190	)		49,792			—			39,453			117			10,864			(159	)		50,275
Royalty and management service (income) expense		—			—			(5,001	)		5,001			—			—			—			—			(6,096	)		6,096			—			—
(Loss) income from consolidated subsidiaries		(372	)		24,006			(6,112	)		—			(17,522	)		—
Income from consolidated subsidiaries																				61,260			86,312			27,966			—			(175,538	)		—

(Loss) income before (benefit of) provision for income taxes		(10,748	)		(16,435	)		41,915			(6,098	)		(17,522	)		(8,888	)
Income from continuing operations before (benefit of) provision for income taxes																				50,526			44,753			119,724			24,785			(175,538	)		64,250
(Benefit of) provision for income taxes		(4,121	)		(16,063	)		17,909			9,574			—			7,299			(4,264	)		(16,507	)		33,412			14,063			—			26,704

Net (loss) income		(6,627	)		(372	)		24,006			(15,672	)		(17,522	)		(16,187	)
Net income from continuing operations																				54,790			61,260			86,312			10,722			(175,538	)		37,546
Income from discontinued operations, net of income taxes																				—			—			—			7,140			—			7,140

Net income																				54,790			61,260			86,312			17,862			(175,538	)		44,686
Less: Net loss attributable to non-controlling interests		—			—			—			(9,560	)		—			(9,560	)		—			—			—			(10,104	)		—			(10,104	)

Net (loss) income attributable to CB Richard Ellis Group, Inc.	$	(6,627	)	$	(372	)	$	24,006		$	(6,112	)	$	(17,522	)	$	(6,627	)
Net income attributable to CB Richard Ellis Group, Inc.																			$	54,790		$	61,260		$	86,312		$	27,966		$	(175,538	)	$	54,790


	Parent			CBRE			Guarantor Subsidiaries			Nonguarantor Subsidiaries			Consolidated Total			Parent			CBRE			Guarantor Subsidiaries			Nonguarantor Subsidiaries			Consolidated Total
CASH FLOWS PROVIDED BY (USED IN) OPERATING ACTIVITIES:	$	17,396		$	46,679		$	(184,459	)	$	6,502		$	(113,882	)	$	18,631		$	30,098		$	(144,258	)	$	(60,861	)	$	(156,390	)

CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Capital expenditures		—			—			(10,798	)		(2,824	)		(13,622	)		—			—			(40,694	)		(6,454	)		(47,148	)
Acquisition of businesses including net assets acquired, intangibles and goodwill		—			—			—			(244	)		(244	)
Acquisition of businesses including net assets acquired, intangibles and goodwill, net of cash acquired																	—			—			(2,290	)		(38,785	)		(41,075	)
Contributions to unconsolidated subsidiaries		—			—			(7,649	)		(31	)		(7,680	)		—			—			(16,873	)		(221	)		(17,094	)
Distributions from unconsolidated subsidiaries		—			—			11,149			19			11,168			—			—			24,352			10,636			34,988
Net proceeds from disposition of real estate held for investment		—			—			—			66,748			66,748			—			—			—			109,667			109,667
Additions to real estate held for investment		—			—			—			(1,488	)		(1,488	)		—			—			—			(6,315	)		(6,315	)
Proceeds from the sale of servicing rights and other assets		—			—			5,185			22			5,207			—			—			11,332			84			11,416
(Increase) decrease in restricted cash		—			(6	)		(732	)		6,722			5,984			—			(10	)		(300	)		4,284			3,974
Other investing activities, net		—			—			(753	)		1			(752	)		—			—			(704	)		—			(704	)

Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities		—			(6	)		(3,598	)		68,925			65,321			—			(10	)		(25,177	)		72,896			47,709

CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Proceeds from senior secured term loans																	—			400,000			—			—			400,000
Repayment of senior secured term loans		—			(9,500	)		—			—			(9,500	)		—			(19,000	)		—			—			(19,000	)
Proceeds from revolving credit facility		—			230,000			—			—			230,000			—			718,000			—			26,733			744,733
Repayment of revolving credit facility		—			(187,000	)		—			—			(187,000	)		—			(652,000	)		—			—			(652,000	)
Proceeds from notes payable on real estate held for investment		—			—			—			1,209			1,209			—			—			—			3,551			3,551
Repayment of notes payable on real estate held for investment		—			—			—			(53,237	)		(53,237	)		—			—			—			(91,471	)		(91,471	)
Proceeds from notes payable on real estate held for sale and under development		—			—			—			549			549			—			—			—			1,665			1,665
Repayment of notes payable on real estate held for sale and under development		—			—			—			(6,090	)		(6,090	)		—			—			—			(26,594	)		(26,594	)
Proceeds from exercise of stock options																	4,858			—			—			—			4,858
Incremental tax benefit from stock options exercised		10,487			—			—			—			10,487			14,495			—			—			—			14,495
Non-controlling interests contributions		—			—			—			208			208			—			—			—			8,630			8,630
Non-controlling interests distributions		—			—			—			(14,188	)		(14,188	)		—			—			—			(30,679	)		(30,679	)
Payment of financing costs		—			(14,017	)		—			(155	)		(14,172	)		—			(18,255	)		—			(199	)		(18,454	)
(Increase) decrease in intercompany receivables, net		(30,492	)		(85,547	)		133,175			(17,136	)		—			(37,922	)		(564,086	)		507,119			94,889			—
Other financing activities, net		2,609			—			—			(39	)		2,570			—			—			—			(91	)		(91	)

Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities		(17,396	)		(66,064	)		133,175			(88,879	)		(39,164	)		(18,569	)		(135,341	)		507,119			(13,566	)		339,643
Effect of currency exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents		—			—			—			8,796			8,796			—			—			—			14,573			14,573


NET DECREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS		—			(19,391	)		(54,882	)		(4,656	)		(78,929	)
NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS																	62			(105,253	)		337,684			13,042			245,535
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, AT BEGINNING OF PERIOD		4			223,845			96,862			185,863			506,574			4			223,845			96,862			185,863			506,574

CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, AT END OF PERIOD	$	4		$	204,454		$	41,980		$	181,207		$	427,645		$	66		$	118,592		$	434,546		$	198,905		$	752,109


SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION:
Cash paid during the period for:
Interest	$	—		$	5,120		$	12		$	7,625		$	12,757		$	—		$	53,102		$	12		$	15,107		$	68,221

Income tax payments, net	$	—		$	—		$	36,171		$	17,959		$	54,130		$	—		$	—		$	55,955		$	39,789		$	95,744


	Parent			CBRE			Guarantor Subsidiaries			Nonguarantor Subsidiaries			Consolidated Total			Parent			CBRE			Guarantor Subsidiaries			Nonguarantor Subsidiaries			Consolidated Total
CASH FLOWS PROVIDED BY (USED IN) OPERATING ACTIVITIES:	$	2,929		$	35,254		$	(24,277	)	$	(6,815	)	$	7,091		$	9,936		$	58,386		$	84,825		$	(52,140	)	$	101,007

CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Capital expenditures		—			—			(1,206	)		(1,692	)		(2,898	)		—			—			(3,376	)		(3,785	)		(7,161	)
Acquisition of businesses including net assets acquired, intangibles and goodwill		—			—			(1,144	)		(2,621	)		(3,765	)		—			—			(2,303	)		(60,417	)		(62,720	)
Contributions to unconsolidated subsidiaries		—			—			(4,970	)		(1,356	)		(6,326	)		—			—			(7,830	)		(3,022	)		(10,852	)
Distributions from unconsolidated subsidiaries		—			—			52			13			65			—			—			15,961			169			16,130
Net proceeds from disposition of real estate held for investment		—			—			—			1,845			1,845			—			—			—			57,249			57,249
Additions to real estate held for investment		—			—			—			(4,229	)		(4,229	)		—			—			—			(5,212	)		(5,212	)
Proceeds from the sale of servicing rights and other assets		—			—			3,337			9			3,346			—			—			9,708			33			9,741
Decrease in restricted cash		—			—			3,457			4,631			8,088
Decrease (increase) in restricted cash																	—			—			8,336			(532	)		7,804
Other investing activities, net		—			—			(974	)		—			(974	)		—			—			(954	)		—			(954	)

Net cash used in investing activities		—			—			(1,448	)		(3,400	)		(4,848	)
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities																	—			—			19,542			(15,517	)		4,025

CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Repayment of senior secured term loans		—			(54,816	)		—			—			(54,816	)		—			(60,770	)		—			—			(60,770	)
Proceeds from revolving credit facility		—			—			—			3,740			3,740			—			—			—			16,349			16,349
Repayment of revolving credit facility		—			—			—			(4,040	)		(4,040	)		—			—			—			(10,496	)		(10,496	)
Proceeds from notes payable on real estate held for investment		—			—			—			3,940			3,940			—			—			—			8,741			8,741
Repayment of notes payable on real estate held for investment		—			—			—			(10,142	)		(10,142	)		—			—			—			(48,493	)		(48,493	)
Proceeds from notes payable on real estate held for sale and under development		—			—			—			1,798			1,798			—			—			—			3,214			3,214
Repayment of notes payable on real estate held for sale and under development		—			—			—			(637	)		(637	)		—			—			—			(3,412	)		(3,412	)
(Repayment of) proceeds from short-term borrowings and other loans, net		—			—			(2	)		7,500			7,498
Repayment of short-term borrowings and other loans, net																	—			—			(547	)		(3,500	)		(4,047	)
Proceeds from exercise of stock options																	312			—			—			—			312
Incremental tax benefit from stock options exercised		279			—			—			—			279			236			—			—			—			236
Non-controlling interests contributions		—			—			—			2,980			2,980			—			—			—			22,103			22,103
Non-controlling interests distributions		—			—			—			(555	)		(555	)		—			—			—			(6,954	)		(6,954	)
Payment of financing costs		—			(4,137	)		—			(220	)		(4,357	)		—			(4,994	)		—			(713	)		(5,707	)
(Increase) decrease in intercompany receivables, net		(3,434	)		10,948			26,358			(33,872	)		—			(10,484	)		(96,284	)		62,640			44,128			—
Other financing activities, net		226			—			—			(138	)		88			—			—			—			(217	)		(217	)

Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities		(2,929	)		(48,005	)		26,356			(29,646	)		(54,224	)		(9,936	)		(162,048	)		62,093			20,750			(89,141	)
Effect of currency exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents		—			—			—			(9,281	)		(9,281	)		—			—			—			(13,885	)		(13,885	)

NET (DECREASE) INCREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS		—			(12,751	)		631			(49,142	)		(61,262	)		—			(103,662	)		166,460			(60,792	)		2,006
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, AT BEGINNING OF PERIOD		4			242,586			283,251			215,716			741,557			4			242,586			283,251			215,716			741,557

CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, AT END OF PERIOD	$	4		$	229,835		$	283,882		$	166,574		$	680,295		$	4		$	138,924		$	449,711		$	154,924		$	743,563

SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION:
Cash paid (received) during the period for:
Interest	$	—		$	25,065		$	13		$	4,524		$	29,602		$	—		$	76,484		$	2		$	8,922		$	85,408

Income tax (refunds) payments, net	$	—		$	—		$	(10,803	)	$	5,709		$	(5,094	)	$	(6,424	)	$	(78,380	)	$	(9,967	)	$	17,724		$	(77,047	)

On July 1, 2011, we completed the CRES portion of the REIM Acquisitions, acquiring substantially all of CRES for $323.9 million and CRES co-investments from ING for an aggregate amount of $58.6 million. We used borrowings from our tranche D term loan facility under our Credit Agreement to finance these transactions (see Note 3 and Note 9).

ITEM 2.

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for CB Richard Ellis Group, Inc. for the three months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2011 represents an update to the more detailed and comprehensive disclosures included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010. Accordingly, you should read the following discussion in conjunction with the information included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K as well as the unaudited financial statements included elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

In addition, some of the statements and assumptions in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q are forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 or Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, each as amended, including, in particular, statements about our plans, strategies and prospects as well as estimates of industry growth for the ~~second~~third quarter and beyond. For important information regarding these forward-looking statements, please see the discussion below under the caption “Forward-Looking Statements.”

We are the world’s largest commercial real estate services firm, based on 2010 revenue, with leading full-service operations in major metropolitan areas throughout the world. We offer a full range of services to occupiers, owners, lenders and investors in office, retail, industrial, multi-family and other types of commercial real estate. As of December 31, 2010, we operated more than 300 offices worldwide, excluding affiliate offices, with approximately 31,000 employees providing commercial real estate services under the “CB Richard Ellis” and “CBRE” brand names and development services under the “Trammell Crow” brand name. Our business is focused on several competencies, including commercial property and corporate facilities management, tenant representation, property/agency leasing, property sales, valuation, real estate investment management, commercial mortgage origination and servicing, capital markets (equity and debt) solutions, development services and proprietary research. We generate revenues from contractual management fees and on a per-project or transactional basis. Since 2006, we have been the only commercial real estate services company included in the S&P 500. In every year since 2008, we have been the only commercial real estate services firm to be included in theFortune 500. Additionally, the International Association of Outsourcing Professionals has included us among the top 100 global outsourcing companies across all industries for five consecutive years, including in 2011 when we ranked 6th overall and were the highest ranked commercial real estate services company. In 2010, we were named the premier real estate services provider globally by a number of institutions, includingThe Financial Times,Euromoneyand the International Property Awards, sponsored by Bloomberg. In 2011, we were the highest ranked commercial real estate services company among theFortuneMost Admired Companies.

When you read our financial statements and the information included in this Quarterly Report, you should consider that we have experienced, and continue to experience, several material trends and uncertainties that have affected our financial condition and results of operations that make it challenging to predict our future performance based on our historical results. We believe that the following material trends and uncertainties are crucial to an understanding of the variability in our historical earnings and cash flows and the potential for continued variability in the future:

Economic trends and government policies affect global and regional commercial real estate markets as well as our operations directly. These include: overall economic activity and employment growth, interest rate levels, the cost and availability of credit and the impact of tax and regulatory policies. Periods of economic weakness or recession, significantly rising interest rates, declining employment levels, decreasing demand for real estate, falling real estate values, or the public perception that any of these events may occur, will negatively affect the performance of some or all of our business lines. From late 2007 through 2009, the severe global economic

downturn and credit market crisis had significant adverse effects on our operations by depressing transaction activity, decreasing occupancy and rental rates, sharply lowering property values and restraining corporate spending. These trends, in turn, adversely affected our revenue from property management fees and commissions derived from property sales, leasing, valuation and financing, and funds available to invest in commercial real estate and related assets. These negative trends began to reverse in 2010 as commercial real estate markets improved in step with the stabilization and recovery of global economic activity.

Weak economic conditions from late 2007 through 2009 also affected our compensation expense, which is structured to generally decrease in line with a fall in revenue. Compensation is our largest expense and the sales and leasing professionals in our largest line of business, advisory services, generally are paid on a commission and bonus basis that correlates with our revenue performance. As a result, the negative effect of difficult market conditions on our operating margins was partially mitigated by the inherent variability of our compensation cost structure. In addition, at times when negative economic conditions are particularly severe, as they were in 2008 and 2009, our management has moved decisively to improve operational performance by lowering operating expenses through such actions as reducing discretionary bonuses, curtailing capital expenditures and adjusting overall staffing levels, among others. WeAs general economic conditions and company performance improved, we began to restore some of these expenses in 2010 ~~as general economic conditions~~ and ~~company performance improved.~~continued to do so in 2011. Notwithstanding the ongoing market recovery, ~~in 2010,~~ a return of adverse global and regional economic trends remains one of the most significant risks to the financial condition and performance of our operations.

Economic conditions first began to negatively affect our performance in the Americas, our largest segment in terms of revenue, beginning in the third quarter of ~~2007, and~~2007. The effects became more severe as the decline in economic activity (particularly in the United States) accelerated throughout 2008 and most of 2009. The ~~economic weakness became most severe following the~~ global capital markets disruption in late 2008, ~~which~~in particular, caused a significant and prolonged decline in property sales, leasing, financing and investment activity that adversely affected all of our business lines. Commercial real estate fundamentals began to stabilize in early 2010 and to improve in the second half of 2010 and ~~early~~the first half of 2011 following a return to positive economic growth in the United ~~States beginning in late 2009.~~States. The ~~continued~~current recovery has been characterized by slowly decreasing vacancy rates, stabilizing or slightly increasing rental rates, broadening credit availability and ~~increasing~~greater property sales and leasing activity. ~~These~~The recovery trends appeared to gain momentum in late 2010 and ~~early~~the first half of 2011, but market activity has generally remained well below levels experienced in 2006 and 2007.

In Europe, weakening market conditions first began to manifest in the United Kingdom in late 2007 and throughout the continent in early 2008. The major European economies also entered into a recession in 2008, which deepened and persisted through 2009. Economic ~~growth~~activity improved in 2010 and the first half of 2011, but ~~remained behind~~growth has been generally slower than in other parts of the world amid concerns about sovereign debt issues and the need for fiscal austerity. As a result, leasing activity in most of Europe ~~continued to be~~has remained subdued in 2010 and ~~early~~the first half of 2011. Investment sales in Europe were adversely affected by the financial crisis in late 2008 and most of 2009. ~~However, larger~~Larger markets like London and Paris ~~began to show~~showed strong increases in investment sales ~~beginning~~starting in late 2009, ~~and continuing into 201l. The recovery of sales~~but activity ~~also began~~appeared to ~~spread to more~~plateau in mid-2011. Other markets ~~across Europe, particularly~~with stronger economies, such as in Germany ~~in 2010~~ and the Nordic countries, have continued to see brisk investment markets through the middle of 2011.

Real estate markets in Asia Pacific were also affected, though generally to a lesser degree than in the United States and Europe, by the global credit market dislocation and economic downturn. This resulted in lower investment sales and leasing activity in the region in 2008 and most of 2009. Transaction activity revived significantly in late 2009, reflecting strong economic growth in countries such as Australia, China ~~India~~ and ~~Singapore,~~India, and this trend has continued into the first half of 2011. The natural disasters that affected parts of the Asia Pacific region, notably Japan, Australia and New Zealand, in late 2010 and early 2011 did not have a material impact on our overall business performance in Asia Pacific during the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2011.

Deteriorating conditions also adversely affected real estate investment management and property development activity beginning in late 2007 as property values declined sharply, and both financing and disposal

options became more limited. However, ~~the financing and sale markets~~market conditions for these businesses began to improve in 2010 with the pace of recovery of the financing and sales markets picking up later in the year and ~~continuing in early~~the first part of 2011.

~~For~~Notwithstanding the current market recovery, the further strengthening of our global sales, leasing, investment management and development services operations ~~to continue strengthening,~~is predicated on the need for more vigorous economic growth and higher aggregate employment ~~will be needed~~ in major countries, especially the United States, and continued improvement in the global credit markets ~~and~~as well as in business and consumer ~~sentiment must continue to improve.~~confidence.

Our management historically has made significant use of strategic acquisitions to add new service competencies, to increase our scale within existing competencies and to expand our presence in various geographic regions around the world. In December 2006, we acquired the Trammell Crow Company (the Trammell Crow Company Acquisition), our largest acquisition to date, which deepened our outsourcing services offerings for corporate and institutional clients, especially project and facilities management, strengthened our ability to provide integrated management solutions across geographies, and established resources and expertise to offer real estate development services throughout the United States.

On February 15, 2011, we announced that we had entered into definitive agreements to acquire the majority of the real estate investment management business of Netherlands-based ING Group N.V., or ING, for approximately $940 million in cash. The acquisitions include substantially all of the ING Real Estate Investment Management, or REIM, operations in Europe and Asia, as well as substantially all of Clarion Real Estate Securities, or CRES, its U.S.-based global real estate listed securities business (collectively referred to as ING REIM). On February 15, 2011, we also announced that we expected to acquire approximately $55 million of CRES co-investments from ING and potentially additional interests in other funds managed by ING REIM Europe and ING REIM Asia. Upon completion of the acquisitions, which we refer to as the REIM Acquisitions, ING REIM is expected to become part of our Global Investment Management segment (whose business is conducted through our indirect wholly-owned subsidiary, CBRE Investors), which will continue to be an independently operated business segment upon completion of the acquisitions. CBRE Investors has primarily focused on value-add funds and separate accounts. ING REIM has primarily focused on core funds and global listed real estate securities funds, except in Asia, where ING REIM manages value-add and opportunity funds. There is expected to be little overlap in the companies’ client bases, with a majority of CBRE Investors’ clients being U.S.-based and a majority of ING REIM’s clients based in Europe. ~~We also expect to acquire approximately $55~~On July 1, 2011, we completed the acquisition of CRES for $323.9 million ofand CRES co-investments from ING ~~and potentially additional interests~~for an aggregate amount of $58.6 million. The acquisition of ING REIM’s operations in ~~other funds managed by ING REIM~~ Europe and ~~ING REIM Asia. These acquisitions, which we refer to as the REIM Acquisitions, are~~Asia is expected to close in the second half of 2011 and ~~are~~is subject to approval by certain stakeholders, including regulatory agencies in ~~the United States,~~ Europe and Asia.

As of December 31, 2010, the assets under management, or AUM, in the ING REIM portfolio we are acquiring totaled approximately $59.8 ~~billion.~~billion, including CRES AUM, which we acquired on July 1, 2011. CBRE Investors’ assets under management totaled $37.6 billion as of December 31, 2010. ING REIM, when combined with our existing Global Investment Management operations, will provide us with a significantly enhanced ability to meet the needs of institutional investors across global markets with a full spectrum of investment programs and strategies.

AUM generally refers to the properties and other assets with respect to which we provide (or participate in) oversight, investment management services and other advice, and which generally consist of real estate properties or loans, securities portfolios and investments in operating companies and joint ventures. Our AUM is intended principally to reflect the extent of our presence in the real estate market, not the basis for determining our management fees. Our material assets under management consist of:

accounts have invested or to which they have provided financing. Committed (but unfunded) capital from investors in our sponsored funds is not included in this component of our AUM. The value of development properties is included at estimated completion cost. In the case of real estate operating companies, the total value of real properties controlled by the companies, generally through joint ventures, is included in AUM; and

the net asset value of our managed securities portfolios, including investments (which may be comprised of committed but uncalled capital) in private real estate funds under our fund of funds program.

Our calculation of AUM may differ from the calculations of other asset managers (including ING REIM, as described below), and as a result this measure may not be comparable to similar measures presented by other asset managers. Our definition of AUM is not based on any definition of assets under management that is set forth in the agreements governing the investment funds that we manage. The methodologies used by the ING REIM business units and CBRE Investors to determine their respective AUM are not the same and, accordingly, the reported AUM of ING REIM would be different if calculated using a methodology consistent with that of CBRE Investors’ methodology. To the extent applicable, ING REIM’s reported AUM at December 31, 2010 was converted from Euros to U.S. dollars using an exchange rate of $1.3379 per €1.

Strategic in-fill acquisitions, which tend to be smaller purchases of local and/or niche market companies, have also played a key role in expanding our geographic coverage and broadening and strengthening our service offerings. The companies we acquired have generally been quality regional firms or niche specialty firms that complement our existing platform within a region, or affiliates in which, in some cases, we held an equity interest. From 2005 to 2008, we completed 58 in-fill acquisitions for an aggregate purchase price of approximately $592 million. In light of the economic environment, we did not complete any acquisitions in 2009 and only made two small niche acquisitions in 2010, an industrial practice in the United Kingdom in the second quarter of 2010 and a commercial property asset management and consultancy services firm in Hong Kong in the fourth quarter of 2010. ~~The companies~~During the six months ended June 30, 2011, we ~~acquired have generally been quality regional firms or niche specialty firms that complement~~completed three in-fill acquisitions, including a valuation business in Australia, a retail property management business in central and eastern Europe and our ~~existing platform within a region, or affiliates~~former affiliate company in ~~which, in some cases, we held an equity interest.~~Switzerland. As market conditions continue to improve, we expect to make additional acquisitions to supplement our organic growth.

Although our management believes that strategic acquisitions can significantly decrease the cost, time and commitment of management resources necessary to attain a meaningful competitive position within targeted markets or to expand our presence within our current markets, our management also believes that most acquisitions will initially have an adverse impact on our operating and net income, both as a result of transaction-related expenditures, which can include severance, lease termination, deferred financing and merger-related costs, among others, and the charges and costs of integrating the acquired business and its financial and accounting systems into our own. For example, we incurred $196.6 million of transaction-related expenditures in connection with our acquisition of Trammell Crow Company in 2006 and ~~$10.9~~$15.8 million of transaction-related expenditures in connection with the expected REIM Acquisitions through ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2011. In addition, through ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2011, we incurred expenses of $62.3 million related to Trammell Crow Company in connection with the integration of its business lines, as well as accounting and other systems, into our own. As with prior material acquisitions, we anticipate incurring significant integration expenses associated with the expected REIM Acquisitions in 2011 and beyond. We expect the total (pre-tax) transaction costs relating to the REIM Acquisitions, including financing, retention and integration costs, to be approximately ~~$150.0~~$150 million.

As we increase our international operations through either acquisitions or organic growth, fluctuations in the value of the U.S. dollar relative to the other currencies in which we may generate earnings could adversely affect our business, financial condition and operating results. Our management team generally seeks to mitigate our

exposure by balancing assets and liabilities that are denominated in the same currency and by maintaining cash positions outside the United States only at levels necessary for operating purposes. In addition, from time to time we enter into foreign currency exchange contracts to mitigate our exposure to exchange rate changes related to particular transactions and to hedge risks associated with the translation of foreign currencies into U.S. dollars. Due to the constantly changing currency exposures to which we are subject and the volatility of currency exchange rates, we cannot predict the effect of exchange rate fluctuations upon future operating results. In addition, fluctuations in currencies relative to the U.S. dollar may make it more difficult to perform period-to-period comparisons of our reported results of operations.

Our international operations also are subject to, among other things, political instability and changing regulatory environments, which may adversely affect our future financial condition and results of operations. Our management routinely monitors these risks and related costs and evaluates the appropriate amount of resources to allocate towards business activities in foreign countries where such risks and costs are particularly significant.

We are highly leveraged and have significant debt service obligations. As of ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2011, our total debt, excluding our notes payable on real estate and warehouse lines of credit (both of which are generally nonrecourse to us), was approximately ~~$1.5 billion.~~$1.9 billion, which includes $400.0 million of term loans drawn on June 30, 2011 to finance the CRES portion of the REIM Acquisitions, which closed on July 1, 2011. In connection with the ~~REIM Acquisitions,~~acquisition of ING REIM’s operations in Europe and Asia (which we ~~have secured and~~anticipate closing in the second half of 2011), we expect to ~~borrow approximately $800.0~~draw down an additional $400.0 million of ~~new~~ delayed-draw term loans that have already been secured under our ~~secured~~ credit agreement to finance such acquisitions.

Our level of indebtedness and the operating and financial restrictions in our debt agreements place constraints on the operation of our business. Although our management believes that long-term indebtedness has been an important lever in the development of our business, including facilitating our acquisition of Trammell Crow Company and the proposed REIM Acquisitions, the cash flow necessary to service this debt is not available for other general corporate purposes, which may limit our flexibility in planning for, or reacting to, changes in our business and in the commercial real estate services industry. Our management seeks to mitigate this exposure both through the refinancing of debt when available on attractive terms and through selective repayment and retirement of indebtedness.

Our consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, which require management to make estimates and assumptions that affect reported amounts. The estimates and assumptions are based on historical experience and on other factors that management believes to be reasonable. Actual results may differ from those estimates. Critical accounting policies represent the areas where more significant judgments and estimates are used in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements. A discussion of such critical accounting policies, which include revenue recognition, our consolidation policy, goodwill and other intangible assets, real estate and income taxes can be found in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010. There have been no material changes to these policies as of ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2011.

The following table sets forth items derived from our consolidated statements of operations for the three and six months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2011 and 2010, presented in dollars and as a percentage of revenue (dollars in thousands):


	Three Months Ended March 31,									Three Months Ended June 30,									Six Months Ended June 30,
	2011				2010					2011				2010					2011				2010
Revenue	$	1,185,105	100.0	%	$	1,025,883		100.0	%	$	1,422,218	100.0	%	$	1,171,919		100.0	%	$	2,607,323	100.0	%	$	2,197,802		100.0	%
Costs and expenses:
Cost of services		713,755	60.2			615,194		60.0			839,822	59.1			678,714		57.9			1,553,577	59.6			1,293,908		58.9
Operating, administrative and other		377,025	31.8			338,706		33.0			432,856	30.4			372,033		31.7			809,881	31.1			710,739		32.3
Depreciation and amortization		23,178	2.0			26,295		2.5			25,385	1.8			27,616		2.4			48,563	1.8			53,911		2.5

Total costs and expenses		1,113,958	94.0			980,195		95.5			1,298,063	91.3			1,078,363		92.0			2,412,021	92.5			2,058,558		93.7
Gain on disposition of real estate		1,972	0.2			—		—			6,027	0.5			3,623		0.3			7,999	0.3			3,623		0.2

Operating income		73,119	6.2			45,688		4.5			130,182	9.2			97,179		8.3			203,301	7.8			142,867		6.5
Equity income (loss) from unconsolidated subsidiaries		15,179	1.3			(6,584	)	(0.7	)
Equity income from unconsolidated subsidiaries											17,068	1.2			14,235		1.2			32,247	1.2			7,651		0.3
Interest income		2,668	0.2			1,800		0.2			1,902	0.1			3,111		0.3			4,570	0.2			4,911		0.2
Interest expense		33,718	2.9			49,792		4.9			34,216	2.4			50,275		4.3			67,934	2.6			100,067		4.5

Income (loss) from continuing operations before provision for income taxes		57,248	4.8			(8,888	)	(0.9	)
Income from continuing operations before provision for income taxes											114,936	8.1			64,250		5.5			172,184	6.6			55,362		2.5
Provision for income taxes		23,406	1.9			7,299		0.7			46,336	3.3			26,704		2.3			69,742	2.7			34,003		1.5

Income (loss) from continuing operations		33,842	2.9			(16,187	)	(1.6	)
Income from continuing operations											68,600	4.8			37,546		3.2			102,442	3.9			21,359		1.0
Income from discontinued operations, net of income taxes		10,644	0.9			—		—			6,267	0.5			7,140		0.6			16,911	0.7			7,140		0.3

Net income (loss)		44,486	3.8			(16,187	)	(1.6	)
Net income											74,867	5.3			44,686		3.8			119,353	4.6			28,499		1.3
Less: Net income (loss) attributable to non-controlling interests		10,117	0.9			(9,560	)	(1.0	)		13,644	1.0			(10,104	)	(0.9	)		23,761	0.9			(19,664	)	(0.9	)

Net income (loss) attributable to CB Richard Ellis Group, Inc.	$	34,369	2.9	%	$	(6,627	)	(0.6	)%
Net income attributable to CB Richard Ellis Group, Inc.										$	61,223	4.3	%	$	54,790		4.7	%	$	95,592	3.7	%	$	48,163		2.2	%

EBITDA (1)	$	113,044	9.5	%	$	74,959		7.3	%	$	166,095	11.7	%	$	161,635		13.8	%	$	279,139	10.7	%	$	236,594		10.8	%

EBITDA, as adjusted (1)	$	120,555	10.2	%	$	87,453		8.5	%	$	172,367	12.1	%	$	165,241		14.1	%	$	292,922	11.2	%	$	252,694		11.5	%

EBITDA represents earnings before net interest expense, income taxes, depreciation and ~~amortization.~~amortization, while amounts shown for EBITDA, as adjusted, remove the impact of certain cash and non-cash charges related to acquisitions, cost containment and asset impairments. Our management believes ~~EBITDA is~~that both of these measures are useful in evaluating our operating performance compared to that of other companies in our industry because the ~~calculation~~calculations of EBITDA and EBITDA, as adjusted, generally ~~eliminates~~eliminate the effects of financing and income taxes and the accounting effects of capital spending and acquisitions, which would include impairment charges of goodwill and intangibles created from acquisitions. Such items may vary for different companies for reasons unrelated to overall operating performance. As a result, our management uses ~~EBITDA as a measure~~these measures to evaluate the operating performance ~~of our various business segments~~ and for other discretionary purposes, including as a significant component when measuring our operating performance under our employee incentive programs. Additionally, we believe EBITDA isand EBITDA, as adjusted, are useful to investors to assist them in getting a more accurate picture of our results from operations.

However, EBITDA isand EBITDA, as adjusted, are not a recognized ~~measurement~~measurements under U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, or GAAP, and when analyzing our operating performance, readers should use EBITDA and EBITDA, as adjusted, in addition to, and not as an alternative for, net income as determined in accordance with GAAP. Because not all companies use identical calculations, our presentation of EBITDA and EBITDA, as adjusted, may not be comparable to similarly titled measures of other companies. Furthermore, EBITDA isand EBITDA, as adjusted, are not intended to be ~~a measure~~measures of free cash flow for our management’s discretionary use, as ~~it does~~they do not consider certain cash requirements such as tax and debt service payments. The

amounts shown for EBITDA and EBITDA, as adjusted, also differ from the amounts calculated under similarly titled definitions in our debt instruments, which are further adjusted to reflect certain other cash and non-cash charges and are used to determine compliance with financial covenants and our ability to engage in certain activities, such as incurring additional debt and making certain restricted payments. ~~Amounts shown for EBITDA, as adjusted, remove the impact of certain cash and non-cash charges related to acquisitions, cost containment and asset impairments.~~


	Three Months Ended March 31,					Three Months Ended June 30,				Six Months Ended June 30,
	2011		2010			2011		2010		2011		2010
Net income (loss) attributable to CB Richard Ellis Group, Inc.	$	34,369	$	(6,627	)
Net income attributable to CB Richard Ellis Group, Inc.						$	61,223	$	54,790	$	95,592	$	48,163
Add:
Depreciation and amortization (1)		23,469		26,295			25,619		27,784		49,088		54,079
Interest expense (2)		34,468		49,792			34,819		50,990		69,287		100,782
Provision for income taxes(3)		23,406		7,299			46,336		31,183		69,742		38,482
Less:
Interest income		2,668		1,800			1,902		3,112		4,570		4,912

EBITDA ~~(3)~~(4)	$	113,044	$	74,959		$	166,095	$	161,635	$	279,139	$	236,594
Adjustments:
Integration and other costs related to acquisitions		7,511		1,006			6,272		964		13,783		1,970
Cost containment expenses		—		7,035			—		2,642		—		9,677
Write-down of impaired assets		—		4,453			—		—		—		4,453

EBITDA, as adjusted ~~(3)~~(4)	$	120,555	$	87,453		$	172,367	$	165,241	$	292,922	$	252,694

Three Months Ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2011 Compared to the Three Months Ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2010

We reported consolidated net income of ~~$34.4~~$61.2 million for the three months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2011 on revenue of ~~$1.2~~$1.4 billion as compared to a consolidated net ~~loss~~income of ~~$6.6~~$54.8 million on revenue of ~~$1.0~~$1.2 billion for the three months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2010.

Our revenue on a consolidated basis for the three months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2011 increased by ~~$159.2~~$250.3 million, or ~~15.5%~~21.4%, as compared to the three months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2010. This increase was primarily driven by higher worldwide sales (up ~~34.5%~~44.0%), leasing (up ~~7.9%~~21.8%) and outsourcing (up ~~13.7%~~13.1%) activity. Foreign currency translation had ~~an $18.5~~a $53.5 million positive impact on total revenue during the three months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2011.

Our cost of services on a consolidated basis increased by ~~$98.6~~$161.1 million, or ~~16.0%~~23.7%, during the three months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2011 as compared to the three months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2010. Our sales and leasing professionals generally are paid on a commission basis, which substantially correlates with our revenue performance. Accordingly, the increase in revenue led to a corresponding increase in commission accruals. In addition, commission reinstatements to pre-recession levels in the third quarter of 2010 contributed to the increase. Higher salaries and related costs associated with our global property and facilities management contracts and additions to headcount in anticipation of transaction revenue growth also contributed to the increase in cost of services in the current year. Foreign

currency translation had ~~an $11.0~~a $30.7 million negative impact on cost of services during the three months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2011. Cost of services as a percentage of revenue ~~was relatively consistent at 60.2%~~increased to 59.1% for the three months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2011 ~~versus 60.0%~~from 57.9% for the three months ended ~~March 31, 2010.~~June 30, 2010, primarily driven by the aforementioned commission reinstatements and additions to headcount.

Our operating, administrative and other expenses on a consolidated basis increased by ~~$38.3~~$60.8 million, or ~~11.3%~~16.3%, during the three months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2011 as compared to the three months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2010. The increase was primarily driven by higher payroll-related costs, ~~including bonuses,~~ which resulted from our improved operating performance and ~~slightly~~ increased headcount, as well as the restoration of salaries to ~~pre-financial crisis~~pre-recession levels in the third quarter of 2010, ~~and~~ substantially restored bonus target levels in the fourth quarter of 2010 and the reinstatement of our U.S. 401(k) company match in December 2010. Also contributing to the increase was higher carried interest incentive compensation expense accruals and increased marketing and travel costs in support of our growing revenue ~~during~~in the ~~three months ended March 31, 2011.~~current year period. Foreign currency translation had a ~~$4.7~~$16.8 million negative impact on total operating expenses during the three months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2011. ~~Operating~~Nevertheless, operating expenses as a percentage of revenue decreased to ~~31.8%~~30.4% for the three months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2011 from ~~33.0%~~31.7% for the three months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2010, which is indicative of effective cost control in the indirect and support areas of our business.

Our depreciation and amortization expense on a consolidated basis decreased by ~~$3.1~~$2.2 million, or ~~11.9%~~8.1%, for the three months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2011 as compared to the three months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2010. This decrease was primarily attributable to lower depreciation expense within our Development Services and Americas ~~segment~~segments in the current year.

Our gain on disposition of real estate on a consolidated basis was ~~$2.0~~$6.0 million for the three months ended ~~March 31, 2011.~~June 30, 2011 as compared to $3.6 million for the three months ended June 30, 2010. These gains resulted from activity within our Development Services segment.

Our equity income from unconsolidated subsidiaries on a consolidated basis ~~was $15.2~~increased by $2.8 million, or 19.9%, for the three months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2011 as compared to ~~an equity loss from unconsolidated subsidiaries of $6.6 million for~~ the three months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2010. ~~The~~This increase ~~in equity income in the current year~~ was primarily driven by higher equity ~~earnings associated with gains on property sales within our Development Services segment. Also contributing to the increase was lower impairment charges associated with equity investments in~~income reported by our Global Investment Management segment in the current year.

Our consolidated interest income was ~~$2.7~~$1.9 million for the three months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2011, ~~an increase~~a decrease of ~~$0.9~~$1.2 million, or ~~48.2%~~38.9%, as compared to the three months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2010. This ~~increase~~decrease was mainly driven

by higher interest income reported in our ~~Americas segment.~~Asia Pacific segment in the prior year, which resulted from the final measurement of a deferred purchase obligation related to the purchase of the remaining non-controlling interests in our Indian subsidiary.

Our consolidated interest expense decreased by $16.1 million, or ~~32.3%~~31.9%, during the three months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2011 as compared to the three months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2010. The decrease was primarily due to lower interest expense associated with our credit agreement due to debt repayments made in the second half of 2010 and lower interest rates resulting from our refinancing activities in the fourth quarter of 2010. This decrease was partially offset by interest expense incurred related to the $350.0 million of 6.625% senior notes issued on October 8, 2010.

Our provision for income taxes on a consolidated basis was ~~$23.4~~$46.3 million for the three months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2011 as compared to ~~$7.3~~$26.7 million for the three months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2010. Our effective tax rate from continuing operations, after adjusting pre-tax income ~~(loss)~~to remove the portion attributable to non-controlling interests, increased to 43.1% for the three months ended June 30, 2011 as compared to 36.1% for the three months ended June 30, 2010. The changes in our provision for income taxes and our effective tax rate were primarily the result of an increase in income reported in the current year as well as a change in our mix of domestic and foreign earnings (losses), including a greater impact in the current year of losses sustained in jurisdictions where no tax benefit could be provided. We expect that the impact of such losses should lessen as 2011 progresses such that we believe our full year 2011 effective tax rate should approximate 40%.

Our consolidated income from discontinued operations, net of income taxes, was $6.3 million for the three months ended June 30, 2011 as compared to $7.1 million for the three months ended June 30, 2010. The income in the current period was reported in our Global Investment Management segment and mostly related to a gain from a property sale, which was all attributable to non-controlling interests. The income in the prior year period was reported in our Development Services segment and mostly related to a gain on a property sale.

Our net income attributable to non-controlling interests on a consolidated basis was $13.6 million for the three months ended June 30, 2011 as compared to a net loss attributable to non-controlling interests of $10.1 million for the three months ended June 30, 2010. This activity primarily reflects our non-controlling interests’ share of income and losses within our Global Investment Management and Development Services segments.

We reported consolidated net income of $95.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011 on revenue of $2.6 billion as compared to consolidated net income of $48.2 million on revenue of $2.2 billion for the six months ended June 30, 2010.

Our revenue on a consolidated basis for the six months ended June 30, 2011 increased by $409.5 million, or 18.6%, as compared to the six months ended June 30, 2010. This increase was primarily driven by higher worldwide sales (up 40.0%), leasing (up 15.4%) and outsourcing (up 13.4%) activity. Foreign currency translation had a $71.9 million positive impact on total revenue during the six months ended June 30, 2011.

Our cost of services on a consolidated basis increased by $259.7 million, or 20.1%, during the six months ended June 30, 2011 as compared to the six months ended June 30, 2010. As previously mentioned, our sales and leasing professionals generally are paid on a commission basis, which substantially correlates with our revenue performance. Accordingly, the increase in revenue led to a corresponding increase in commission accruals. In addition, commission reinstatements to pre-recession levels in the third quarter of 2010 contributed to the increase. Higher salaries and related costs associated with our global property and facilities management contracts and additions to headcount in anticipation of transaction revenue growth also contributed to the increase in cost of services in the current year. Foreign currency translation had a $41.8 million negative impact on cost of services during the six months ended June 30, 2011. Cost of services as a percentage of revenue increased to 59.6% for the six months ended June 30, 2011 from 58.9% for the six months ended June 30, 2010, primarily driven by the aforementioned commission reinstatements and additions to headcount.

Our operating, administrative and other expenses on a consolidated basis increased by $99.1 million, or 13.9%, during the six months ended June 30, 2011 as compared to the six months ended June 30, 2010. The increase was primarily driven by higher payroll-related costs, which resulted from our improved operating performance and increased headcount, as well as the restoration of salaries to pre-recession levels in the third quarter of 2010, substantially restored bonus target levels in the fourth quarter of 2010 and the reinstatement of our U.S. 401(k) company match in December 2010. Also contributing to the increase was higher carried interest incentive compensation expense accruals and increased marketing and travel costs in support of our growing revenue during the six months ended June 30, 2011. Foreign currency translation had a $21.5 million negative impact on total operating expenses during the six months ended June 30, 2011. Nevertheless, operating expenses as a percentage of revenue decreased to 31.1% for the six months ended June 30, 2011 from 32.3% for the six months ended June 30, 2010, which is indicative of effective cost control in the indirect and support areas of our business.

Our depreciation and amortization expense on a consolidated basis decreased by $5.3 million, or 9.9%, for the six months ended June 30, 2011 as compared to the six months ended June 30, 2010. This decrease was primarily attributable to lower depreciation expense within our Americas and Development Services segments in the current year.

Our gain on disposition of real estate on a consolidated basis was $8.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011 as compared to $3.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2010. These gains resulted from activity within our Development Services segment.

Our equity income from unconsolidated subsidiaries on a consolidated basis increased by $24.6 million, or 321.5%, for the six months ended June 30, 2011 as compared to the six months ended June 30, 2010. This increase was primarily driven by higher equity earnings associated with gains on property sales within our Development Services segment in the current year. Also contributing to the increase were higher impairment charges associated with equity investments in our Global Investment Management segment in the prior year.

Our consolidated interest income was relatively consistent at $4.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011 versus $4.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2010.

Our consolidated interest expense decreased by $32.1 million, or 32.1%, during the six months ended June 30, 2011 as compared to the six months ended June 30, 2010. The decrease was primarily due to lower interest expense associated with our credit agreement due to debt repayments made in the second half of 2010 and lower interest rates resulting from our refinancing activities in the fourth quarter of 2010. This decrease was partially offset by interest expense incurred related to the $350.0 million of 6.625% senior notes issued on October 8, 2010.

Our provision for income taxes on a consolidated basis was $69.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011 as compared to $34.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2010. Our effective tax rate from continuing operations, after adjusting pre-tax income to remove the portion attributable to non-controlling interests, decreased to ~~40.5%~~42.2% for the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2011 as compared to ~~1,086.2%~~45.5% for the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2010. The changes in our provision for income taxes and our effective tax rate were primarily the result of a significant increase in income reported in the current year as well as a change in our mix of domestic and foreign earnings (losses)~~. We currently expect that our full year 2011 effective~~, including losses sustained in jurisdictions where no tax ~~rate will~~benefit could be ~~slightly lower than our effective tax rate for the three months ended March 31, 2011.~~provided.

Our consolidated income from discontinued operations, net of income taxes, was ~~$10.6~~$16.9 million for the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March 31, 2011. This~~June 30, 2011 as compared to $7.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2010. The income in the current period was reported in our Global Investment Management segment and mostly related to ~~a gain~~gains from a property ~~sale,~~sales, which was all attributable to non-controlling interests. The income in the prior year period was reported in our Development Services segment and mostly related to a gain on a property sale.

Our net income attributable to non-controlling interests on a consolidated basis was ~~$10.1~~$23.8 million for the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2011 as compared to a net loss attributable to non-controlling interests of ~~$9.6~~$19.7 million for the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2010. This activity primarily reflects our non-controlling interests’ share of income and losses within our Global Investment Management and Development Services segments.

We report our operations through the following segments: (1) Americas, (2) EMEA, (3) Asia Pacific, (4) Global Investment Management and (5) Development Services. The Americas consists of operations located in the United States, Canada and selected parts of Latin America. EMEA mainly consists of operations in Europe, while Asia Pacific includes operations in Asia, Australia and New Zealand. The Global Investment Management business consists of investment management operations in the United States, Europe and Asia. The Development Services business consists of real estate development and investment activities primarily in the United States.

The following table summarizes our revenue, costs and expenses and operating income (loss) by our Americas, EMEA, Asia Pacific, Global Investment Management and Development Services operating segments for the three and six months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2011 and 2010 (dollars in thousands):


	Three Months Ended June 30,										Six Months Ended June 30,
	2011					2010					2011					2010
Americas
Revenue	$	897,828		100.0	%	$	722,255		100.0	%	$	1,647,943		100.0	%	$	1,367,866		100.0	%
Costs and expenses:
Cost of services		567,338		63.2			448,937		62.2			1,044,667		63.4			859,224		62.8
Operating, administrative and other		217,473		24.2			186,075		25.8			414,890		25.2			360,916		26.4
Depreciation and amortization		14,831		1.7			14,997		2.0			27,662		1.6			29,687		2.2

Operating income	$	98,186		10.9	%	$	72,246		10.0	%	$	160,724		9.8	%	$	118,039		8.6	%

EBITDA (1)	$	115,375		12.9	%	$	89,847		12.4	%	$	193,503		11.7	%	$	151,835		11.1	%

EMEA
Revenue	$	261,087		100.0	%	$	225,378		100.0	%	$	466,055		100.0	%	$	413,538		100.0	%
Costs and expenses:
Cost of services		155,738		59.6			132,132		58.6			287,011		61.6			251,583		60.8
Operating, administrative and other		84,195		32.2			72,820		32.3			154,977		33.3			137,796		33.3
Depreciation and amortization		2,253		0.9			2,384		1.1			4,515		0.9			4,774		1.2

Operating income	$	18,901		7.3	%	$	18,042		8.0	%	$	19,552		4.2	%	$	19,385		4.7	%

EBITDA (1)	$	21,375		8.2	%	$	19,865		8.8	%	$	24,381		5.2	%	$	23,990		5.8	%

Asia Pacific
Revenue	$	188,546		100.0	%	$	158,678		100.0	%	$	349,046		100.0	%	$	293,110		100.0	%
Costs and expenses:
Cost of services		116,746		61.9			97,645		61.5			221,899		63.6			183,101		62.5
Operating, administrative and other		53,862		28.6			48,220		30.4			95,966		27.5			88,925		30.3
Depreciation and amortization		1,988		1.0			2,007		1.3			3,971		1.1			4,119		1.4

Operating income	$	15,950		8.5	%	$	10,806		6.8	%	$	27,210		7.8	%	$	16,965		5.8	%

EBITDA (1)	$	17,437		9.2	%	$	12,777		8.1	%	$	29,879		8.6	%	$	21,035		7.2	%

Global Investment Management
Revenue	$	57,554		100.0	%	$	46,896		100.0	%	$	107,876		100.0	%	$	86,303		100.0	%
Costs and expenses:
Operating, administrative and other		57,942		100.7			39,930		85.1			103,498		95.9			80,869		93.7
Depreciation and amortization		3,171		5.5			3,613		7.7			6,666		6.2			6,470		7.5

Operating (loss) income	$	(3,559	)	(6.2	)%	$	3,353		7.2	%	$	(2,288	)	(2.1	)%	$	(1,036	)	(1.2	)%

EBITDA (1) (2)	$	2,470		4.3	%	$	10,766		23.0	%	$	8,460		7.8	%	$	5,836		6.8	%

Development Services
Revenue	$	17,203		100.0	%	$	18,712		100.0	%	$	36,403		100.0	%	$	36,985		100.0	%
Costs and expenses:
Operating, administrative and other		19,384		112.7			24,988		133.5			40,550		111.4			42,233		114.2
Depreciation and amortization		3,142		18.2			4,615		24.7			5,749		15.8			8,861		24.0
Gain on disposition of real estate		6,027		35.0			3,623		19.4			7,999		22.0			3,623		9.8

Operating income (loss)	$	704		4.1	%	$	(7,268	)	(38.8	)%	$	(1,897	)	(5.2	)%	$	(10,486	)	(28.4	)%

EBITDA (1) (3)	$	9,438		54.9	%	$	28,380		151.7	%	$	22,916		63.0	%	$	33,898		91.7	%

Three Months Ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2011 Compared to the Three Months Ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2010

Revenue increased by ~~$104.5~~$175.6 million, or ~~16.2%~~24.3%, for the three months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2011 as compared to the three months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2010. This improvement was primarily driven by higher sales and leasing activity as well as increased commercial mortgage brokerage and outsourcing activity. Foreign currency translation had a ~~$5.9~~$7.5 million positive impact on total revenue during the three months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2011.

Cost of services increased by ~~$67.0~~$118.4 million, or ~~16.3%~~26.4%, for the three months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2011 as compared to the three months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2010, primarily due to increased commission expense resulting from higher sales and lease transaction revenue. In addition, commission reinstatements to pre-recession levels in the third quarter of 2010 contributed to the increase. Higher salaries and related costs associated with our property and facilities management contracts also contributed to an increase in cost of services in the current year. Foreign currency translation had a ~~$3.7~~$4.6 million negative impact on cost of services during the three months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2011. Cost of services as a percentage of revenue ~~was consistent at 63.6%~~increased to 63.2% for ~~both~~ the three months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2011 ~~and 2010.~~from 62.2% for the three months ended June 30, 2010, mainly due to the commission reinstatements.

Operating, administrative and other expenses increased by ~~$22.6~~$31.4 million, or ~~12.9%~~16.9%, for the three months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2011 as compared to the three months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2010. The increase was primarily driven by higher payroll-related costs, ~~including bonuses,~~ which resulted from increased headcount and improved operating performance as well as the restoration of salaries to pre-recession levels in the third quarter of 2010, ~~and~~ substantially restored bonus target levels in the fourth quarter of 2010 and the reinstatement of our U.S. 401(k) company match in December 2010. Also contributing to the increase were higher marketing and travel costs in support of our growing revenue. Foreign currency translation had a ~~$1.4~~$1.8 million negative impact on total operating expenses during the three months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2011.

Revenue increased by ~~$16.8~~$35.7 million, or ~~8.9%~~15.8%, for the three months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2011 as compared to the three months ended ~~March 31, 2010. This increase was primarily attributable to higher outsourcing activities throughout the region, and increased sales activity, led~~June 30, 2010, driven by ~~France and Germany. Foreign~~foreign currency translation, which had a ~~$0.3~~$25.2 million positive impact on total revenue during the three months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2011. Leasing and outsourcing growth also drove the increase, particularly in France, the Netherlands, Spain and the United Kingdom.

Cost of services increased by ~~$11.8~~$23.6 million, or ~~9.9%~~17.9%, for the three months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2011 as compared to the three months ended ~~March 31, 2010. This~~June 30, 2010, largely due to foreign currency translation, which had a $14.8 million negative impact on cost of services during the three months ended June 30, 2011. The increase was also driven by increased headcount resulting from select hiring in 2010 and early 2011 in anticipation of improving transaction revenue and in support of new initiatives and recently won contracts that we believe should translate into meaningful revenue. Cost of services as a percentage of revenue increased to 59.6% for the three months ended June 30, 2011 from 58.6% for the three months ended June 30, 2010, primarily driven by the previously mentioned additions to headcount.

Operating, administrative and other expenses increased by $11.4 million, or 15.6%, for the three months ended June 30, 2011 as compared to the three months ended June 30, 2010, largely due to foreign currency translation, which had a $7.5 million negative impact on total operating expenses during the three months ended June 30, 2011. The increase was also driven by higher payroll-related costs, including bonuses, largely resulting from additions to headcount.

Revenue increased by $29.9 million, or 18.8%, for the three months ended June 30, 2011 as compared to the three months ended June 30, 2010, driven by foreign currency translation, which had a $19.4 million positive

impact on total revenue during the three months ended June 30, 2011. Higher outsourcing activity in Asia, most notably in India, increased sales activity, led by Australia and China, and increased leasing activity, particularly in China, also contributed to the improvement.

Cost of services increased by $19.1 million, or 19.6%, for the three months ended June 30, 2011 as compared to the three months ended June 30, 2010, largely driven by foreign currency translation, which had an $11.3 million negative impact on cost of services during the three months ended June 30, 2011. Higher salaries and related costs associated with our property and facilities management ~~contracts.~~contracts as well as increases in headcount throughout the region also contributed to the increase. Cost of services as a percentage of revenue was relatively consistent at 61.9% for the three months ended June 30, 2011 versus 61.5% for the three months ended June 30, 2010.

Operating, administrative and other expenses increased by $5.6 million, or 11.7%, for the three months ended June 30, 2011 as compared to the three months ended June 30, 2010. This increase was primarily due to foreign currency translation, which had a $5.9 million negative impact on total operating expenses during the three months ended June 30, 2011, and higher payroll related costs due to increased headcount. These increases were partially offset by lower legal fees incurred in the current year.

Revenue increased by $10.7 million, or 22.7%, for the three months ended June 30, 2011 as compared to the three months ended June 30, 2010. This was largely driven by higher asset management fees in the current year. Foreign currency translation had a $1.4 million positive impact on total revenue during the three months ended June 30, 2011.

Operating, administrative and other expenses increased by $18.0 million, or 45.1%, for the three months ended June 30, 2011 as compared to the three months ended June 30, 2010. This increase was primarily driven by a net accrual for carried interest incentive compensation of $5.3 million for dedicated Global Investment Management executives and team leaders with participation interests in certain real estate investments under management during the three months ended June 30, 2011 as compared to a net reversal of carried interest incentive compensation of $0.5 million in the prior year period. Also contributing to the increase ~~was aggressive hiring~~were higher bonus accruals and costs incurred in the ~~region in anticipation of improving transaction based revenues.~~current year associated with the REIM Acquisitions. Foreign currency translation had a $1.6 million negative impact on total operating expenses during the three months ended June 30, 2011.

Total AUM as of June 30, 2011 amounted to $39.1 billion, up 4.0% from year-end 2010 and 16.0% from the second quarter of 2010. The second-quarter 2011 total AUM does not yet include $21.1 billion of global listed real estate securities assets now managed by CBRE Clarion Securities, which were acquired from ING on July 1, 2011.

Revenue decreased by $1.5 million, or 8.1%, for the three months ended June 30, 2011 as compared to the three months ended June 30, 2010 primarily due to lower rental income as a result of property dispositions.

Operating, administrative and other expenses decreased by $5.6 million, or 22.4%, for the three months ended June 30, 2011 as compared to the three months ended June 30, 2010. This decrease was primarily driven by lower bonus accruals (largely due to prior-year property sales in excess of current-year property sales) and lower property operating expenses as a result of the property dispositions noted above.

Development projects in process as of June 30, 2011 totaled $4.9 billion, unchanged from year-end 2010 and up $0.5 billion from the second quarter of 2010. The inventory of deals in the pipeline as of June 30, 2011 was $1.4 billion, up $0.2 billion from year-end 2010 and $0.6 billion from the second quarter of 2010.

Revenue increased by $280.1 million, or 20.5%, for the six months ended June 30, 2011 as compared to the six months ended June 30, 2010. This improvement was primarily driven by higher sales and leasing activity as well as increased commercial mortgage brokerage and outsourcing activity. Foreign currency translation had a $13.3 million positive impact on total revenue during the six months ended June 30, 2011.

Cost of services increased by $185.4 million, or 21.6%, for the six months ended June 30, 2011 as compared to the six months ended June 30, 2010, primarily due to increased commission expense resulting from higher sales and lease transaction revenue. In addition, commission reinstatements to pre-recession levels in the third quarter of 2010 contributed to the increase. Higher salaries and related costs associated with our property and facilities management contracts also contributed to an increase in cost of services in the current year. Foreign currency translation had an $8.3 million negative impact on cost of services during the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2011. Cost of services as a percentage of revenue increased slightly to ~~64.0%~~63.4% for the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2011 from ~~63.5%~~62.8% for the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2010, primarily due to the commission reinstatements.

Operating, administrative and other expenses increased by $54.0 million, or 15.0%, for the six months ended June 30, 2011 as compared to the six months ended June 30, 2010. The increase was primarily driven by higher payroll-related costs, which resulted from increased headcount and improved operating performance as well as the restoration of salaries to pre-recession levels in the third quarter of 2010, substantially restored bonus target levels in the fourth quarter of 2010 and the reinstatement of our U.S. 401(k) company match in December 2010. Also contributing to the increase were higher marketing and travel costs in support of our growing revenue. Foreign currency translation had a $3.2 million negative impact on total operating expenses during the six months ended June 30, 2011.

Revenue increased by $52.5 million, or 12.7%, for the six months ended June 30, 2011 as compared to the six months ended June 30, 2010, driven by foreign currency translation, which had a $25.4 million positive impact on total revenue during the six months ended June 30, 2011. Also contributing to the increase was higher outsourcing activities throughout the region, and increased sales and leasing activity, led by France and the United Kingdom.

Cost of services increased by $35.4 million, or 14.1%, for the six months ended June 30, 2011 as compared to the six months ended June 30, 2010, driven by foreign currency translation, which had a $14.4 million negative impact on cost of services during the six months ended June 30, 2011. Also contributing to the increase were additions to headcount resulting from select hiring in 2010 and early 2011 in anticipation of improving transaction revenue and in support of new initiatives and recently won contracts that we believe should translate into meaningful revenue. Cost of services as a percentage of revenue increased to 61.6% for the six months ended June 30, 2011 from 60.8% for the six months ended June 30, 2010, primarily driven by a shift in the mix of revenue, with outsourcing revenue comprising a greater portion of the total than in the prior year, as well as the previously mentioned additions to headcount.

Operating, administrative and other expenses increased by ~~$5.8~~$17.2 million, or ~~8.9%~~12.5%, for the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2011 as compared to the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March 31, 2010. This~~June 30, 2010, driven by foreign currency translation, which had a $7.3 million negative impact on total operating expenses during the six months ended June 30, 2011. The increase was ~~primarily~~also driven by higher payroll-related costs ~~including bonuses,~~ largely resulting from additions to ~~headcount. Higher~~headcount and higher marketing

and travel costs in support of our growing revenue ~~also contributed to~~in the ~~increase. Foreign currency translation had a $0.2 million positive impact on total operating expenses during the three months ended March 31, 2011.~~current year.

Revenue increased by ~~$26.1~~$55.9 million, or ~~19.4%~~19.1%, for the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2011 as compared to the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March 31, 2010. This revenue increase was primarily~~June 30, 2010, driven by ~~higher~~foreign currency translation, which had a $31.8 million positive

impact on total revenue during the six months ended June 30, 2011. Higher sales activity, led by Australia and China, increased leasing activity, particularly in ~~Australia,~~ China, ~~Japan~~ and ~~Singapore. Higher~~higher outsourcing activity in Asia, most notably in India, also contributed to the increase. ~~Foreign currency translation had a $12.3 million positive impact on total revenue during the three months ended March 31, 2011.~~

Cost of services increased by ~~$19.7~~$38.8 million, or ~~23.0%~~21.2%, for the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2011 as compared to the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March 31, 2010. Cost~~June 30, 2010, driven by foreign currency translation, which had a $19.1 million negative impact on cost of services ~~as a percentage of revenue increased to 65.5% for~~during the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March 31, 2011 as compared to 63.6% for the three months ended March 31, 2010. These increases were primarily driven by higher~~June 30, 2011. Higher salaries and related costs associated with our property and facilities management contracts, ~~as well as~~ increases in headcount throughout the ~~region. Also contributing to the increase in cost of services was~~region and higher commission expense resulting from increased transaction ~~revenue. Foreign currency translation had a $7.8 million negative impact on cost~~revenue also contributed to the increase. Cost of services ~~during~~as a percentage of revenue increased to 63.6% for the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March 31, 2011.~~June 30, 2011 as compared to 62.5% for the six months ended June 30, 2010, primarily driven by additions to headcount.

Operating, administrative and other expenses increased by ~~$1.4~~$7.0 million, or ~~3.4%~~7.9%, for the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2011 as compared to the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2010. This increase was primarily due to foreign currency translation, which had a ~~$3.5~~$9.4 million negative impact on total operating expenses during the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2011 and higher payroll related costs due to increased headcount. These increases were partially offset by lower legal fees incurred in the current year.

Revenue increased by ~~$10.9~~$21.6 million, or ~~27.7%~~25.0%, for the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2011 as compared to the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2010. This was largely driven by higher asset management and acquisition fees in the current year. Foreign currency translation had a ~~negligible~~$1.4 million positive impact on total revenue during the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2011.

Operating, administrative and other expenses increased by ~~$4.6~~$22.6 million, or ~~11.3%~~28.0%, for the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2011 as compared to the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2010. This increase was primarily driven by costs incurred in the current year associated with the ~~anticipated~~ REIM ~~Acquisitions, partially offset by lower provisions for bad debt~~Acquisitions. Also contributing to the increase were higher carried interest incentive compensation and higher bonus accruals in the current year. Foreign currency translation had a ~~negligible~~$1.6 million negative impact on total operating expenses during the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2011.

~~Total AUM as of March 31, 2011 amounted to $37.9 billion, up 1% from year-end 2010 and 14% from the first quarter of 2010.~~

Revenue ~~increased by $0.9~~was relatively consistent at $36.4 million ~~or 5.1%,~~ for the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2011 ~~as compared to~~versus $37.0 million for the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March 31, 2010 primarily due to higher incentive fees, partially offset by lower rental income as a result of property dispositions.~~June 30, 2010.

Operating, administrative and other expenses ~~increased~~decreased by ~~$3.9~~$1.7 million, or ~~22.7%~~4.0%, for the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2011 as compared to the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2010. This ~~increase~~decrease was primarily driven ~~by higher bonus accruals resulting from improved business performance primarily from gains on property sales in the current year, partially offset~~ by lower property operating expenses as a result of ~~the~~ property ~~dispositions noted above.~~

Development projects in process as of March 31, 2011 totaled $4.9 billion, unchanged from year-end 2010 and up $0.2 billion from first-quarter 2010. The inventory of deals in the pipeline as of March 31, 2011 stood at $1.5 billion, up $0.3 billion from year-end 2010 and up $0.6 billion from first-quarter 2010.dispositions.

We believe that we can satisfy our working capital requirements and funding of investments with internally generated cash flow and, as necessary, borrowings under our revolving credit facility. Our 2011 expected capital requirements include up to ~~$100~~$100.0 million of anticipated net capital expenditures. During the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2011, we incurred ~~$13.0~~$35.3 million of net capital expenditures. As of ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2011, we had aggregate commitments of ~~$11.7~~$18.0 million to fund future co-investments in our Global Investment Management business, all of which is expected to be funded in 2011. Additionally, as of ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2011, we had committed to fund ~~$22.2~~$21.4 million of additional capital to unconsolidated subsidiaries within our Development Services business, which we may be required to fund at any time. In recent years, the global credit markets have experienced unprecedented tightening, which could affect both the availability and cost of our funding sources in the future.

During 2003 and 2006, we required substantial amounts of equity and debt financing to fund our acquisitions of Insignia and Trammell Crow Company. In the past two years, we also conducted two debt offerings. The first, in 2009, was part of a capital restructuring in response to the global economic recession, and the second, in 2010, was to take advantage of low interest rates and term availability. Absent extraordinary transactions such as these and the equity offerings we completed during the unprecedented recent global capital markets disruption in 2008 and 2009, we historically have not sought external sources of financing and have relied on our internally generated cash flow and our revolving credit facility to fund our working capital, capital expenditure and investment requirements. In the absence of such extraordinary events, our management anticipates that our cash flow from operations and our revolving credit facility would be sufficient to meet our anticipated cash requirements for the foreseeable future, but at a minimum for the next 12 months.

As evidenced above, from time to time, we consider potential strategic acquisitions. We believe that any future significant acquisitions that we make most likely would require us to obtain additional debt or equity financing. In the past, we have been able to obtain such financing for material transactions on terms that we believed to be reasonable. However, it is possible that we may not be able to find acquisition financing on favorable terms, or at all, in the future if we decide to make any further material acquisitions.

Our long-term liquidity needs, other than those related to ordinary course obligations and commitments such as operating leases, generally are comprised of ~~two~~three elements. The first is the repayment of the outstanding and anticipated principal amounts of our long-term indebtedness. We are unable to project with certainty whether our long-term cash flow from operations will be sufficient to repay our long-term debt when it comes due. If ~~this~~our cash flow is insufficient, then we expect that we would need to refinance such indebtedness or otherwise amend its terms to extend the maturity dates. We cannot make any assurances that such refinancing or amendments would be available on attractive terms, if at all.

The second long-term liquidity need is the repayment of obligations under our pension plans in the United Kingdom. Our subsidiaries based in the United Kingdom maintain two contributory defined benefit pension plans to provide retirement benefits to existing and former employees participating in the plans. With respect to these plans, our historical policy has been to contribute annually an amount to fund pension cost as actuarially determined and as required by applicable laws and regulations. Our contributions to these plans are invested and, if these investments do not perform in the future as well as we expect, we will be required to provide additional funding to cover the shortfall. The underfunded status of our pension plans included in pension liability in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets was ~~$40.6~~$40.1 million and $40.0 million at ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively. We expect to contribute a total of $3.7 million to fund our pension plans for the year ending December 31, 2011, of which ~~$0.9~~$1.8 million was funded as of ~~March~~June 30, 2011.

The third long-term liquidity need is the payment of deferred obligations related to acquisitions. As of June 30, 2011, we had $13.6 million of deferred purchase obligations outstanding related to in-fill acquisitions completed during the six months ended June 30, 2011. As of December 31, ~~2011.~~2010, there were no deferred purchase obligations outstanding.

Net cash used in operating activities totaled ~~$113.9~~$156.4 million for the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2011 as compared to net cash provided by operating activities of ~~$7.1~~$101.0 million for the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2010. The increase in cash used in operating activities in the current year versus the same period last year was primarily due to higher bonuses, commissions and income taxes paid in the current year. These items were partially offset by a ~~greater~~ decrease in ~~receivables~~real estate held for sale and under development and an increase in bonus accruals in the current year as well as improved operating performance in the current year.

Net cash provided by investing activities totaled ~~$65.3~~$47.7 million for the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2011, an increase of $43.7 million as compared to ~~net cash used in investing activities of $4.8 million for~~ the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2010. The increase ~~in cash provided by investing activities in the current year versus the prior year period~~ was primarily driven by higher net proceeds received from the disposition of real estate held for investment and higher distributions received from investments in unconsolidated ~~subsidiaries.~~subsidiaries in the current year as well as greater payments associated with in-fill acquisitions in the prior year. These increases were partially offset by higher capital expenditures and contributions to investments in unconsolidated subsidiaries in the current ~~year period.~~year.

Net cash provided by financing activities totaled $339.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011 as compared to net cash used in financing activities ~~totaled $39.2~~of $89.1 million for the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March 31, 2011, a decrease of $15.1 million as compared to the three months ended March 31,~~June 30, 2010. The ~~decrease~~increase in cash provided by financing activities in the current year versus the same period last year was primarily due to $400.0 million of tranche D term loan facilities drawn at June 30, 2011 used to finance the CRES portion of the REIM Acquisitions that closed on July 1, 2011. In addition, higher net borrowings under our revolving credit facility in the current year as well as higher repayments of our senior secured term loans in the prior year ~~as well as higher net borrowings under our revolving credit facility in~~also contributed to the ~~current year.~~increase. These items were partially offset by higher net repayments of notes payable on real estate and greater distributions to non-controlling interests ~~and an increase in financing costs paid~~ in the current year.

Our level of indebtedness increases the possibility that we may be unable to generate cash sufficient to pay when due, the principal of, interest on or other amounts due in respect of our indebtedness and other obligations. In addition, we may incur additional debt from time to time to finance strategic acquisitions, investments, joint ventures or for other purposes, subject to the restrictions contained in the documents governing our indebtedness. If we incur additional debt, the risks associated with our leverage, including our ability to service our debt, would increase.

Since 2001, we have maintained credit facilities with Credit Suisse Group AG, or CS, and other lenders to fund strategic acquisitions and to provide for our working capital needs. On November 10, 2010, we entered into a new credit agreement (as amended, the Credit Agreement) with a syndicate of banks led by CS, as administrative and collateral agent, to completely refinance our previous credit facilities. On March 4, 2011, we

entered into an amendment to our ~~credit agreement~~Credit Agreement to, among other things, increase flexibility to various covenants to accommodate the REIM Acquisitions and to maintain the availability of the $800.0 million incremental facility under the Credit Agreement. On March 4, 2011, we also entered into an incremental assumption agreement to allow for the establishment of new tranche C and tranche D term loan facilities.

Our Credit Agreement currently provides for the following: (1) a $700.0 million revolving credit facility, including revolving credit loans, letters of credit and a swingline loan facility, maturing on May 10, 2015; (2) a $350.0 million tranche A term loan facility requiring quarterly principal payments, ~~beginning~~which began on December 31, 2010 and ~~continuing~~continue through September 30, 2015, with the balance payable on November 10, 2015, (3) a $300.0 million tranche B term loan facility requiring quarterly principal payments, ~~beginning~~which began on December 31, 2010 and ~~continuing~~continue through September 30, 2016, with the balance payable on November 10, 2016; (4) a $400.0 million delayed draw seven year tranche C term loan facility with a maturity date of March 4, 2018; (5) a $400.0 million ~~delayed draw eight and one-half year~~ tranche D term loan facility requiring quarterly principal payments beginning September 30, 2011 and continuing through June 30, 2019, with ~~a maturity date of~~the balance payable on September 4, 2019 and (6) an accordion provision which provides the ability to borrow an additional $800.0 million, which can be further expanded, subject to the satisfaction of what we believe are customary conditions. In regards to the tranche C and tranche D term loan facilities, we have up to 180 days from the date we entered into the related incremental assumption agreement to draw on these facilities during which period we are required to pay a fee on the unused portions of each facility. After 180 days, any unused portions of these facilities will no longer be available for use. On June 30, 2011, we drew down $400.0 million of the tranche D term loan facility to finance the CRES portion of the REIM Acquisitions, which closed on July 1, 2011. The acquisition of ING REIM’s operations in Europe and Asia is expected to close in the second half of 2011 and we anticipate financing it primarily with the entire $400.0 million of the tranche C term loan facility and cash on hand.

The revolving credit facility allows for borrowings outside of the U.S., with sub-facilities of $5.0 million available to one of our Canadian subsidiaries, $35.0 million in aggregate available to one of our Australian and one of our New Zealand subsidiaries and $50.0 million available to one of our U.K. subsidiaries. Additionally, outstanding borrowings under these sub-facilities may be up to 5.0% higher as allowed under the currency fluctuation provision in the Credit Agreement. Borrowings under the revolving credit facility as of ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2011 bear interest at varying rates, based at our option, on either the applicable fixed rate plus 1.65% to 3.15% or the daily rate plus 0.65% to 2.15% as determined by reference to our ratio of total debt less available cash to EBITDA (as defined in the Credit Agreement). As of ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, we had ~~$60.7~~$111.2 million and $17.5 million, respectively, of revolving credit facility principal outstanding with related weighted average interest rates of ~~3.7%~~4.4% and 3.5%, respectively, which are included in short-term borrowings in the consolidated balance sheets set forth in Item 1 of this Quarterly Report. As of ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2011, letters of credit totaling ~~$20.0~~$13.6 million were outstanding under the revolving credit facility. These letters of credit were primarily issued in the normal course of business as well as in connection with certain insurance programs and reduce the amount we may borrow under the revolving credit facility.

Borrowings under the term loan facilities as of ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2011 bear interest, based at our option, on the following: for the tranche A term loan facility, on either the applicable fixed rate plus 2.00% to 3.75% or the daily rate plus 1.00% to 2.75%, as determined by reference to our ratio of total debt less available cash to EBITDA (as defined in the Credit Agreement), for the tranche B term loan facility, on either the applicable fixed rate plus 3.25% or the daily rate plus 2.25%, for the tranche C term loan facility, on either the applicable fixed rate plus 3.25% or the daily rate plus 2.25% and for the tranche D term loan facility, on either the applicable fixed rate plus 3.50% or the daily rate plus 2.50%. As of ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, we had ~~$332.5~~$323.8 million and $341.3 million, respectively, of tranche A term loan facility principal outstanding and ~~$298.5~~$297.7 million and $299.2 million, respectively, of tranche B term loan facility principal outstanding, which are included in the consolidated balance sheets set forth in Item 1 of this Quarterly Report. As of ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2011, ~~and December 31, 2010,~~we also had $400.0 million of tranche D term loan facility principal outstanding, which is included in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets set forth in Item 1 of this Quarterly Report. As of June 30, 2011, there were no amounts outstanding under our tranche C ~~and tranche D~~ term loan ~~facilities.~~facility.

In March 2011, we entered into five interest rate swap agreements, all with effective dates in October 2011, and immediately designated them as cash flow hedges in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board, or FASB, Accounting Standards Codification, or ASC, Topic 815, “Derivatives and Hedging.” The purpose of these interest rate swap agreements is to hedge potential changes to our cash flows due to the variable interest

nature of our senior secured term loan facilities. The total notional amount of these interest rate swap agreements is $400.0 million, with $200.0 million expiring on October 2, 2017 and $200.0 million expiring on September 4,

2019. There was no hedge ineffectiveness for the three and six months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2011. As of ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2011, the fair values of ~~four~~these interest rate swap agreements were reflected as a $2.0 million asset and were included in other long-term assets in the consolidated balance sheets set forth in Item 1 of this Quarterly Report. The fifth interest rate swap agreement was reflected as a $0.3an $11.5 million liability and ~~was~~were included in other long-term liabilities in the consolidated balance sheets set forth in Item 1 of this Quarterly Report.

On October 8, 2010, CB Richard Ellis Services, Inc., or CBRE, our wholly-owned subsidiary, issued $350.0 million in aggregate principal amount of 6.625% senior notes due October 15, 2020. The 6.625% senior notes are unsecured obligations of CBRE, senior to all of its current and future subordinated indebtedness, but effectively subordinated to all of its current and future secured indebtedness. The 6.625% senior notes are jointly and severally guaranteed on a senior basis by us and each subsidiary of CBRE that guarantees our Credit Agreement. Interest accrues at a rate of 6.625% per year and is payable semi-annually in arrears on April 15 and October 15, having commenced on April 15, 2011. The 6.625% senior notes are redeemable at our option, in whole or in part, on or after October 15, 2014 at a redemption price of 104.969% of the principal amount on that date and at declining prices thereafter. At any time prior to October 15, 2014, the 6.625% senior notes may be redeemed by us, in whole or in part, at a redemption price equal to 100% of the principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest and an applicable premium (as defined in the indenture governing these notes), which is based on the present value of the October 15, 2014 redemption price plus all remaining interest payments through October 15, 2014. In addition, prior to October 15, 2013, up to 35.0% of the original issued amount of the 6.625% senior notes may be redeemed at a redemption price of 106.625% of the principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest, solely with the net cash proceeds from public equity offerings. If a change of control triggering event (as defined in the indenture governing our 6.625% senior notes) occurs, we are obligated to make an offer to purchase the remaining 6.625% senior notes at a redemption price of 101.0% of the principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest. The amount of the 6.625% senior notes included in the consolidated balance sheets set forth in Item 1 of this Quarterly Report was $350.0 million at both ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010.

On June 18, 2009, CBRE issued $450.0 million in aggregate principal amount of 11.625% senior subordinated notes due June 15, 2017 for approximately $435.9 million, net of discount. The 11.625% senior subordinated notes are unsecured senior subordinated obligations of CBRE and are jointly and severally guaranteed on a senior subordinated basis by us and our domestic subsidiaries that guarantee our Credit Agreement. Interest accrues at a rate of 11.625% per year and is payable semi-annually in arrears on June 15 and December 15. The 11.625% senior subordinated notes are redeemable at our option, in whole or in part, on or after June 15, 2013 at 105.813% of par on that date and at declining prices thereafter. At any time prior to June 15, 2013, the 11.625% senior subordinated notes may be redeemed by us, in whole or in part, at a price equal to 100% of the principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest and an applicable premium (as defined in the indenture governing these notes), which is based on the present value of the June 15, 2013 redemption price plus all remaining interest payments through June 15, 2013. In addition, prior to June 15, 2012, up to 35.0% of the original issued amount of the 11.625% senior subordinated notes may be redeemed at 111.625% of par, plus accrued and unpaid interest, solely with the net cash proceeds from public equity offerings. In the event of a change of control (as defined in the indenture governing our 11.625% senior subordinated notes), we are obligated to make an offer to purchase the remaining 11.625% senior subordinated notes at a redemption price of 101.0% of the principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest. The amount of the 11.625% senior subordinated notes included in the consolidated balance sheets set forth in Item 1 of this Quarterly Report, net of unamortized discount, was ~~$438.0~~$438.3 million and $437.7 million at ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively.

Our Credit Agreement and the indentures governing our 6.625% senior notes and 11.625% senior subordinated notes contain numerous restrictive covenants that, among other things, limit our ability to incur additional indebtedness, pay dividends or make distributions to stockholders, repurchase capital stock or debt,

make investments, sell assets or subsidiary stock, create or permit liens on assets, engage in transactions with affiliates, enter into sale/leaseback transactions, issue subsidiary equity and enter into consolidations or mergers. Our Credit Agreement also currently requires us to maintain a minimum coverage ratio of EBITDA (as defined in the Credit Agreement) to total interest expense of 2.25x and a maximum leverage ratio of total debt less available cash to EBITDA (as defined in the Credit Agreement) of 3.75x. Our coverage ratio of EBITDA to total interest expense was ~~10.1x~~13.58x for the trailing twelve months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2011 and our leverage ratio of total debt less available cash to EBITDA was ~~1.07x~~1.25x as of ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2011. We may from time to time, in our sole discretion, look for opportunities to reduce our outstanding debt under our Credit Agreement and under our 6.625% senior notes and 11.625% senior subordinated notes.

From time to time, Moody’s Investor Service, Inc., or Moody’s, and Standard & Poor’s Ratings Services, or Standard & Poor’s, rate our senior debt. Neither the Moody’s nor the Standard & Poor’s ratings impact our ability to borrow under our Credit Agreement. However, these ratings may impact our ability to borrow under new agreements in the future and the interest rates of any such future borrowings.

We had short-term borrowings of ~~$338.4~~$413.7 million and $471.4 million with related average interest rates of ~~2.6%~~3.1% and 2.8% as of ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, ~~respectively.~~respectively, which are included in the consolidated balance sheets set forth in Item 1 of this Quarterly Report.

On March 2, 2007, we entered into a $50.0 million credit note with Wells Fargo Bank for the purpose of purchasing eligible investments, which include cash equivalents, agency securities, A1/P1 commercial paper and eligible money market funds. The proceeds of this note are not made generally available to us, but instead deposited in an investment account maintained by Wells Fargo Bank and used and applied solely to purchase eligible investment securities. This agreement has been amended several times and currently provides for a $40.0 million revolving credit note, bears interest at 0.25% and has a maturity date of December 1, 2011. As of ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, there were no amounts outstanding under this note.

On March 4, 2008, we entered into a $35.0 million credit and security agreement with Bank of America, or BofA, for the purpose of purchasing eligible financial instruments, which include A1/P1 commercial paper, U.S. Treasury securities, GSE discount notes (as defined in the credit and security agreement) and money market funds. The proceeds of this loan are not made generally available to us, but instead deposited in an investment account maintained by BofA and used and applied solely to purchase eligible financial instruments. This agreement has been amended several times and currently provides for a $5.0 million credit line, bears interest at 1% and has a maturity date of February 28, 2012. As of ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, there were no amounts outstanding under this agreement.

On August 19, 2008, we entered into a $15.0 million uncommitted facility with First Tennessee Bank for the purpose of purchasing investments, which include cash equivalents, agency securities, A1/P1 commercial paper and eligible money market funds. The proceeds of this facility are not made generally available to us, but instead are held in a collateral account maintained by First Tennessee Bank. This agreement has been amended several times and currently provides for a $4.0 million credit line, bears interest at 0.25% and has a maturity date of August 4, ~~2011.~~2012. As of ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, there were no amounts outstanding under this facility.

Our wholly-owned subsidiary, CBRE Capital Markets, has the following warehouse lines of credit: credit agreements with JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., or JP Morgan, BofA, TD Bank, N.A., or TD Bank, and Kemps Landing Capital Company, LLC, or Kemps Landing, for the purpose of funding mortgage loans that will be resold and a funding arrangement with Fannie Mae for the purpose of selling a percentage of certain closed multi-family loans.

On November 15, 2005, CBRE Capital Markets entered into a secured credit agreement with JP Morgan to establish a warehouse line of credit. Effective October 12, 2010 through January 10, 2011, the warehouse line of credit was temporarily increased from $210.0 million to $250.0 million. Effective November 22, 2010 through February 1, 2011, the warehouse line of credit was temporarily increased further from $250.0 million to $300.0 million. This agreement has been amended several times and currently provides for a $210.0 million senior secured revolving line of credit, bears interest at the daily ~~Chase-London~~ LIBOR plus 2.50% and has a maturity date of September 28, 2011.

On April 16, 2008, CBRE Capital Markets entered into a secured credit agreement with BofA to establish a warehouse line of credit. This agreement has been amended several times and currently provides for a $125.0 million senior secured revolving line of credit, bears interest at the daily one-month LIBOR plus ~~2.50%~~2.0% with a maturity date of May ~~31, 2011.~~30, 2012.

In August 2009, CBRE Capital Markets entered into a funding arrangement with Fannie Mae under its Multifamily As Soon As Pooled Plus Agreement and its Multifamily As Soon As Pooled Sale Agreement, or ASAP Program. Under the ASAP Program, CBRE Capital Markets may elect, on a transaction by transaction basis, to sell a percentage of certain closed multifamily loans to Fannie Mae on an expedited basis. After all contingencies are satisfied, the ASAP Program requires that CBRE Capital Markets repurchase the interest in the multifamily loan previously sold to Fannie Mae followed by either a full delivery back to Fannie Mae via whole loan execution or a securitization into a mortgage backed security. Under this agreement, the maximum outstanding balance under the ASAP Program cannot exceed $150.0 million and, between the sale date to Fannie Mae and the repurchase date by CBRE Capital Markets, the outstanding balance bears interest and is payable to Fannie Mae at the daily LIBOR rate plus 1.35% with a LIBOR floor of 0.35%.

On December 21, 2010, CBRE Capital Markets entered into a secured credit agreement with TD Bank to establish a warehouse line of credit. This agreement provides for a $75.0 million senior secured revolving line of credit, bears interest at the daily one-month LIBOR plus ~~2.00%~~2.0% with a maturity date of December 31, 2011.

On December 21, 2010, CBRE Capital Markets entered into an uncommitted funding arrangement with Kemps Landing providing CBRE Capital Markets with the ability to fund Freddie Mac multi-family loans. Under the agreement, the maximum outstanding balance cannot exceed $200.0 million, outstanding borrowings bear interest at LIBOR plus 2.75% with a LIBOR floor of 0.25% and the agreement expires on December 20, 2011.

During the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2011, we had a maximum of $557.0 million of warehouse lines of credit principal outstanding. As of ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, we had ~~$277.7~~$302.5 million and $453.8 million of warehouse lines of credit principal outstanding, respectively, which are included in short-term borrowings in the consolidated balance sheets set forth in Item 1 of this Quarterly Report. Additionally, we had ~~$285.7~~$308.2 million and $485.4 million of mortgage loans held for sale (warehouse receivables), which substantially represented mortgage loans funded through the lines of credit that, while committed to be purchased, had not yet been purchased as of ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively, and which are also included in the consolidated balance sheets set forth in Item 1 of this Quarterly Report.

subsidiaries’ outstanding reserves for claims under certain insurance programs as well as letters of credit related to operating leases. These letters of credit are primarily executed by us in the ordinary course of business as well as in connection with certain insurance programs. The letters of credit expire at varying dates through ~~May~~July 2012.

From time to time, we act as a general contractor with respect to construction projects. We do not consider these activities to be a material part of our business. In connection with these activities, we seek to subcontract construction work for certain projects to reputable subcontractors. Should construction defects arise relating to the underlying projects, we could potentially be liable to the client for the costs to repair such defects, although we would generally look to the subcontractor that performed the work to remedy the defect and also look to insurance policies that cover this work. While there can be no assurance, we do not expect to incur material losses with respect to construction defects.

In January 2008, CBRE Multifamily Capital, Inc., or CBRE MCI, a wholly-owned subsidiary of CBRE Capital Markets, Inc., entered into an agreement with Fannie Mae, under Fannie Mae’s Delegated Underwriting and Servicing Lender Program, or DUS Program, to provide financing for multifamily housing with five or more units. Under the DUS Program, CBRE MCI originates, underwrites, closes and services loans without prior approval by Fannie Mae, and in selected cases, is subject to sharing up to one-third of any losses on loans originated under the DUS Program. CBRE MCI has funded loans subject to such loss sharing arrangements with unpaid principal balances of ~~$2.3~~$2.5 billion at ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2011. Additionally, CBRE MCI has funded loans under the DUS Program that are not subject to loss sharing arrangements with unpaid principal balances of approximately ~~$464.7~~$522.7 million at ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2011. CBRE MCI, under its agreement with Fannie Mae, must post cash reserves under formulas established by Fannie Mae to provide for sufficient capital in the event losses occur. As of ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, CBRE MCI had ~~$2.6~~$3.3 million and $2.2 million, respectively, of cash deposited under this reserve arrangement, and had provided approximately ~~$4.4~~$4.7 million and $4.0 million, respectively, of loan loss accruals. Fannie Mae’s recourse under the DUS Program is limited to the assets of CBRE MCI, which totaled approximately ~~$195.0~~$104.3 million (including ~~$138.0~~$46.6 million of warehouse receivables, a substantial majority of which are pledged against warehouse lines of credit and are therefore not available to Fannie Mae) at ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2011.

An important part of the strategy for our Global Investment Management business involves investing our capital in certain real estate investments with our clients. These co-investments typically range from 2%2.0% to 5%5.0% of the equity in a particular fund. As of ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2011, we had aggregate commitments of ~~$11.7~~$18.0 million to fund future co-investments, all of which is expected to be funded in 2011. In addition to required future capital contributions, some of the co-investment entities may request additional capital from us and our subsidiaries holding investments in those assets and the failure to provide these contributions could have adverse consequences to our interests in these investments.

A significant portion of our revenue is seasonal, which can affect an investor’s ability to compare our financial condition and results of operations on a quarter-by-quarter basis. Historically, this seasonality has caused our revenue, operating income, net income and cash flow from operating activities to be lower in the first two quarters and higher in the third and fourth quarters of each year. Earnings and cash flow have historically been particularly concentrated in the fourth quarter due to investors and companies focusing on completing transactions prior to calendar year-end. This has historically resulted in lower profits or a loss in the first quarter, with revenue and profitability improving in each subsequent quarter.

In ~~January~~December 2010, the Financial Accounting Standards Board, or FASB, issued Accounting Standards Update, or ~~ASU, 2010-06, “~~~~Improving Disclosures about Fair Value Measurements~~,” which provides amendments to the FASB ASC Subtopic 820-10 that require new disclosures regarding (i) transfers in and out of Level 1 and Level 2 fair value measurements and (ii) activity in Level 3 fair value measurements. ASU 2010-06 also clarifies existing disclosures regarding (i) the level of asset and liability disaggregation and (ii) fair value measurement inputs and valuation techniques. As required, in 2010, we adopted the new disclosures and clarifications of existing disclosure requirements, except for the disclosures about purchases, sales, issuances and settlements in the roll forward of activity in Level 3 fair value measurements, which became effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2010, and for interim periods within those fiscal years. The complete adoption of ASU 2010-06 did not have a material impact on the disclosure requirements for our consolidated financial statements.

~~In December 2010, the FASB issued~~ ASU, 2010-29, “Business Combinations (Topic 805), Disclosure of Supplementary Pro Forma Information for Business Combinations.” ASU 2010-29 specifies that when a public company completes a business combination, the company should disclose revenue and earnings of the combined entity as though the business combination occurred as of the beginning of the comparable prior annual reporting period. The update also expands the supplemental pro forma disclosures under Topic 805 to include a description of the nature and amount of material, non-recurring pro forma adjustments directly attributable to the business combination included in the pro forma revenue and earnings. The requirements of ASU 2010-29 ~~will be~~are effective for business combinations that occur on or after the beginning of the first annual reporting period beginning on or after December 15, 2010. We do not believe the adoption of this update will have a material impact on the disclosure requirements for our consolidated financial statements.

fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2011, with early adoption permitted, and will require retrospective application for all periods presented. We do not believe the adoption of this update will have a material impact on the disclosure requirements for our consolidated financial statements.

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q includes forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The words “anticipate,” “believe,” “could,” “should,” “propose,” “continue,” “estimate,” “expect,” “intend,” “may,” “plan,” “predict,” “project,” “will” and similar terms and phrases are used in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q to identify forward-looking statements. Except for historical information contained herein, the matters addressed in this Quarterly Report are forward-looking statements. These statements relate to analyses and other information based on forecasts of future results and estimates of amounts not yet determinable. These statements also relate to our future prospects, developments and business strategies.

These forward-looking statements are made based on our management’s expectations and beliefs concerning future events affecting us and are subject to uncertainties and factors relating to our operations and business environment, all of which are difficult to predict and many of which are beyond our control. These uncertainties and factors could cause our actual results to differ materially from those matters expressed in or implied by these forward-looking statements.

The following factors are among those, but are not only those, that may cause actual results to differ materially from the forward-looking statements:

Forward-looking statements speak only as of the date the statements are made. You should not put undue reliance on any forward-looking statements. We assume no obligation to update forward-looking statements to reflect actual results, changes in assumptions or changes in other factors affecting forward-looking information,

except to the extent required by applicable securities laws. If we do update one or more forward-looking statements, no inference should be drawn that we will make additional updates with respect to those or other forward-looking statements. Additional information concerning these and other risks and uncertainties is contained in our other periodic filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

The information in this section should be read in connection with the information on market risk related to changes in interest rates and non-U.S. currency exchange rates in Part II, Item 7A, Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk, in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010. Our exposure to market risk consists of foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations related to our international operations and changes in interest rates on debt obligations.

During the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2011, approximately ~~39%~~40% of our business was transacted in local currencies of foreign countries, the majority of which includes the Euro, the British pound sterling, the Canadian dollar, the Hong Kong dollar, the Japanese yen, the Singapore dollar, the Australian dollar and the Indian rupee. We attempt to manage our exposure primarily by balancing assets and liabilities and maintaining cash positions in foreign currencies only at levels necessary for operating purposes. We routinely monitor our exposure to currency exchange rate changes in connection with transactions and sometimes enter into foreign currency exchange swap, option and forward contracts to limit our exposure to such transactions, as appropriate. In the normal course of business, we also sometimes utilize derivative financial instruments in the form of foreign currency exchange contracts to mitigate foreign currency exchange exposure resulting from inter-company loans,

expected cash flow and earnings. We apply the “Derivatives and Hedging” Topic of the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) (Topic 815) when accounting for any such contracts. In all cases, we view derivative financial instruments as a risk management tool and, accordingly, do not engage in any speculative activities with respect to foreign currency.

On February 2, 2011, we entered into four option agreements, including one to sell a notional amount of 0.4 million Euros, which expired on March 29, 2011, one to sell a notional amount of 6.5 million Euros, which ~~expires~~expired on June 28, 2011, one to sell a notional amount of 6.5 million Euros, which expires on September 28, 2011 and one to sell a notional amount of 22.0 million Euros, which expires on December 28, 2011. On February 3, 2011, we entered into an additional four option agreements, including one to sell a notional amount of 4.0 million British pounds sterling, which was exercised on March 29, 2011, one to sell a notional amount of 7.4 million British pounds sterling, which ~~expires~~was exercised on June 28, 2011, one to sell a notional amount of 6.8 million British pounds sterling, which expires on September 28, 2011 and one to sell a notional amount of 12.0 million British pounds sterling, which expires on December 28, 2011. On February 23, 2011, we entered into three additional option agreements, including one to sell a notional amount of 2.1 million British pounds sterling, which ~~expires~~was exercised on June 28, 2011, one to sell a notional amount of 2.0 million British pounds sterling, which expires on September 28, 2011 and one to sell a notional amount of 2.8 million British pounds sterling, which expires on December 28, 2011. Included in the consolidated statement of operations set forth in Item 1 of this Quarterly Report were charges of ~~$1.4~~$1.2 million and $2.6 million for the three and six months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2011, respectively, resulting from net losses on foreign currency exchange option agreements.

In March 2011, we entered into five interest rate swap agreements, all with effective dates in October 2011, and immediately designated them as cash flow hedges in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 815. The purpose of these interest rate swap agreements is to hedge potential changes to our cash flows due to the variable interest nature of our senior secured term loan facilities. The total notional amount of these interest rate swap agreements is $400.0 million, with $200.0 million expiring on October 2, 2017 and $200.0 million expiring on September 4, 2019. There was no hedge ineffectiveness for the three and six months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2011. As of ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2011, the fair values of ~~four~~these interest rate swap agreements were reflected as a $2.0 million asset and were included in other long-term assets in the consolidated balance sheets set forth in Item 1 of this Quarterly Report. The fifth interest rate swap agreement was reflected as a $0.3an $11.5 million liability and ~~was~~were included in other long-term liabilities in the consolidated balance sheets set forth in Item 1 of this Quarterly Report.

We also enter into loan commitments that relate to the origination or acquisition of commercial mortgage loans that will be held for resale. FASB ASC Topic 815 requires that these commitments be recorded at their fair values as derivatives. The net impact on our financial position and earnings resulting from these derivatives contracts has not been significant.

Based upon information from third-party banks, the estimated fair value of our senior secured term loans was approximately ~~$632.7 million~~$1.0 billion at ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2011. Based on dealers’ quotes, the estimated fair values of our 6.625% and 11.625% senior subordinated notes were ~~$364.0~~$359.6 million and ~~$516.8~~$509.0 million, respectively, at ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2011.

We utilize sensitivity analyses to assess the potential effect of our variable rate debt. If interest rates were to increase by ~~10%~~10.0% on our outstanding variable rate debt, excluding notes payable on real estate, at ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2011, the net impact of the additional interest cost would be a decrease of ~~$0.7~~$2.7 million on pre-tax income and an increase of ~~$0.7~~$2.7 million on cash used in operating activities for the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2011.

We also have ~~$571.4~~$520.0 million of notes payable on real estate as of ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2011. Interest costs relating to notes payable on real estate include both interest that is expensed and interest that is capitalized as part of the cost of real estate. If interest rates were to increase by ~~10%~~10.0%, our total estimated interest cost related to notes payable would increase by approximately ~~$0.8~~$1.4 million for the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2011. From time to time, we enter into interest rate swap and cap agreements in order to limit our interest expense related to our notes payable on real estate. If any of these agreements are not designated as effective hedges, then they are marked to market

each period with the change in fair value recognized in current period earnings. The net impact on our earnings resulting from gains and/or losses on interest rate swap and cap agreements associated with notes payable on real estate has not been significant.

Our policy for disclosure controls and procedures provides guidance on the evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures and is designed to ensure that all corporate disclosure is complete and accurate in all material respects and that all information required to be disclosed in the periodic reports submitted by us under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods and in the manner specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by a company in the reports that it files or submits under the Securities Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to the company’s management, including its principal executive and principal financial officers, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. As of the end of the period covered by this report, we carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures. Our Disclosure Committee consisting of the principal accounting officer, general counsel, chief communication officer, senior officers of each significant business line and other select employees assisted the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer in this evaluation. Based upon that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as required by the Securities Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(c) as of the end of the period covered by this report.

No changes in our internal control over financial reporting occurred during the fiscal quarter ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2011 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

There have been no material changes to our legal proceedings as previously disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the ~~annual period~~year ended December 31, 2010.

There have been no material changes to our risk factors as previously disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the ~~annual period~~year ended December 31, 2010.


Exhibit Number		Description

4.2(b)		Form of Supplemental Indenture among CB Richard Ellis Services, Inc., CB Richard Ellis Group, Inc., certain new U.S. subsidiaries from time-to-time, the other guarantors party thereto and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as trustee, for the 11.625% Senior Subordinated Notes Due June 15, 2017 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of the CB Richard Ellis Group, Inc. Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on September 10, 2009)

4.3(a)		Indenture, dated as of October 8, 2010, among CB Richard Ellis Services, Inc., CB Richard Ellis Group, Inc., the other guarantors party thereto and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as trustee, for the 6.625% Senior Notes Due October 15, 2020 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of the CB Richard Ellis Group, Inc. Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on October 12, 2010)

4.3(b)		Form of Supplemental Indenture among CB Richard Ellis Services, Inc., CB Richard Ellis Group, Inc., certain new U.S. subsidiaries from time-to-time, the other guarantors party thereto and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as trustee, for the 6.625% Senior Notes Due October 15, 2020 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of the CB Richard Ellis Group, Inc. Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on November 17, 2010)

~~10.1~~		Amendment No. 1 to the Credit Agreement, dated as of March 4, 2011, among CB Richard Ellis Group, Inc., CB Richard Ellis Services, Inc., certain subsidiaries of CB Richard Ellis Services, Inc., the lenders party thereto and Credit Suisse AG, as administrative agent and collateral agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the CB Richard Ellis Group, Inc. Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on March 10, 2011)

~~10.2~~		Incremental Assumption Agreement, dated as of March 4, 2011, among CB Richard Ellis Group, Inc., CB Richard Ellis Services, Inc., certain subsidiaries of CB Richard Ellis Services, Inc., the lenders party thereto and Credit Suisse AG, as administrative agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of the CB Richard Ellis Group, Inc. Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on March 10, 2011)

~~10.3~~		~~Executive Bonus Plan, amended and restated as of February 10, 2011*+~~

11		Statement concerning Computation of Per Share Earnings (filed as Note 11 of the Consolidated Financial Statements)

31.1		Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to §302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002*

31.2		Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to §302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002*

32		Certifications of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002*

101.INS		XBRL Instance Document**

101.SCH		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document**

101.CAL		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document**

101.DEF		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document**

101.LAB		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document**

101.PRE		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document**

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.


Delaware		94-3391143
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification Number)

11150 Santa Monica Boulevard, Suite 1600 Los Angeles, California		90025
(Address of principal executive offices)		(Zip Code)

(310) 405-8900
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)		(Former name, former address and former fiscal year if changed since last report)


		Page
PART I—FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1.	Financial Statements
	Consolidated Balance Sheets at ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2011 (Unaudited) and December 31, 2010		3
	Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three and six months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2011 and 2010 (Unaudited)		4
	Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2011 and 2010 (Unaudited)		5
	Consolidated Statement of Equity for the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2011 (Unaudited)		6
	Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)		7
Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations		2832
Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk		4957
Item 4.	Controls and Procedures		5059

PART II—OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1.	Legal Proceedings		5160
Item 1A.	Risk Factors		5160
Item 6.	Exhibits		5261
Signatures			5463


	Net Carrying Value as of June 30, 2010		Fair Value Measured and Recorded Using						Total Impairment Charges for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2010
	Net Carrying Value as of June 30, 2010		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
Investments in unconsolidated subsidiaries	$	32,803	$	—	$	—	$	32,803	$	6,947


Exhibit Number		Description

2.1		First Amendment, dated June 20, 2011, to Share Purchase Agreement (CRES), dated as of February 15, 2011, by and among ING Real Estate Investment Management Holding B.V. and others, and CB Richard Ellis, Inc. and ~~others (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 of the CB Richard Ellis Group, Inc. Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on February 18, 2011)~~others*

2.2		Second Amendment dated July 1, 2011, to Share Purchase Agreement (CRES), dated as of February 15, 2011, by and among ING Real Estate Investment Management Holding B.V. and others, and CB Richard Ellis, Inc. and others*

2.3		First Amendment, dated June 20, 2011, to Share Purchase Agreement (PERE), dated as of February 15, 2011, by and among ING Real Estate Investment Management Holding B.V. and others, ~~(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.2 of the~~and CB Richard Ellis, ~~Group,~~ Inc. ~~Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on February 18, 2011)~~and others*

3.1		Restated Certificate of Incorporation of CB Richard Ellis Group, Inc. filed on June 16, 2004, as amended by the Certificate of Amendment filed on June 4, 2009 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of the CB Richard Ellis Group, Inc. Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the SEC on August 10, 2009)

3.2		Amended and Restated By-laws of CB Richard Ellis Group, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 of the CB Richard Ellis Group, Inc. Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on December 5, 2008)

4.1(a)		Securityholders’ Agreement, dated as of July 20, 2001 ~~(“Securityholders’ Agreement”)~~(Securityholders’ Agreement), by and among, CB Richard Ellis Group, Inc., CB Richard Ellis Services, Inc., Blum Strategic Partners, L.P., Blum Strategic Partners II, L.P., Blum Strategic Partners II GmbH & Co. KG, FS Equity Partners III, L.P., FS Equity Partners International, L.P., Credit Suisse First Boston Corporation, DLJ Investment Funding, Inc., The Koll Holding Company, Frederic V. Malek, the management investors named therein and the other persons from time to time party thereto (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 25 to Amendment No. 9 to Schedule 13D with respect to CB Richard Ellis Services, Inc. filed with the SEC on July 25, 2001)

4.1(b)		Amendment and Waiver to Securityholders’ Agreement, dated as of April 14, 2004, by and among, CB Richard Ellis Group, Inc., CB Richard Ellis Services, Inc. and the other parties to the Securityholders’ Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2(b) of the CB Richard Ellis Group, Inc. Amendment No. 2 to Registration Statement on Form S-1 filed with the SEC (No. 333-112867) on April 30, 2004)

4.1(c)		Second Amendment and Waiver to Securityholders’ Agreement, dated as of November 24, 2004, by and among CB Richard Ellis Group, Inc., CB Richard Ellis Services, Inc. and certain of the other parties to the Securityholders’ Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2(c) of the CB Richard Ellis Group, Inc. Amendment No. 1 to Registration Statement on Form S-1 filed with the SEC (No. 333-120445) on November 24, 2004)

4.1(d)		Third Amendment and Waiver to Securityholders’ Agreement, dated as of August 1, 2005, by and among CB Richard Ellis Group, Inc., CB Richard Ellis Services, Inc. and certain of the other parties to the Securityholders’ Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of the CB Richard Ellis Group, Inc. Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on August 2, 2005)

4.2(a)		Indenture, dated as of June 18, 2009, among CB Richard Ellis Services, Inc., CB Richard Ellis Group, Inc., the other guarantors party thereto and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as trustee, for the 11.625% Senior Subordinated Notes Due June 15, 2017 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of the CB Richard Ellis Group, Inc. Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on June 23, 2009)


		CB RICHARD ELLIS GROUP, INC.

Date: ~~May 10,~~August 9, 2011		/s/ GIL BOROK
		Gil Borok
		Chief Financial Officer (principal financial officer)

Date: ~~May 10,~~August 9, 2011		/s/ ARLIN GAFFNER
		Arlin Gaffner
		Chief Accounting Officer (principal accounting officer)


	Net Carrying Value as of March 31, 2010		Fair Value Measured and Recorded Using						Total Impairment Charges for the Three Months Ended March 31, 2010


			Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
Investments in unconsolidated subsidiaries	$	38,172	$	—	$	—	$	38,172	$	6,947