See accompanying notes.

Under Armour, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to the Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements

1. Description of the Business

Under Armour, Inc. is a developer, marketer and distributor of branded performance apparel, footwear and accessories. These products are sold worldwide and worn by athletes at all levels, from youth to professional on playing fields around the globe, as well as by consumers with active lifestyles.

2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Basis of Presentation

The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Under Armour, Inc. and its wholly owned subsidiaries (the “Company”). Certain information in footnote disclosures normally included in annual financial statements was condensed or omitted for the interim periods presented in accordance with the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) and accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for interim consolidated financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments consisting of normal, recurring adjustments considered necessary for a fair statement of the financial position and results of operations were included. All intercompany balances and transactions were eliminated. The consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2010 is derived from the audited financial statements included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC for the year ended December 31, 2010 (the “2010 Form 10-K”), which should be read in conjunction with these consolidated financial statements. The results for the three and sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2011 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the year ending December 31, 2011 or any other portions thereof.

Concentration of Credit Risk

Financial instruments that subject the Company to a significant concentration of credit risk consist primarily of accounts receivable. The majority of the Company’s accounts receivable are due from large sporting goods retailers. Credit is extended based on an evaluation of the customer’s financial condition, and generally collateral is not required. The most significant customers that accounted for a large portion of net revenues and accounts receivable were as follows:

Allowance for Doubtful Accounts

As of JuneSeptember 30, 2011, December 31, 2010 and JuneSeptember 30, 2010, the allowance for doubtful accounts was $3.6$3.7 million, $4.9 million and $4.8$4.6 million, respectively.

Shipping and Handling Costs

The Company charges certain customers shipping and handling fees. These fees are recorded in net revenues. The Company includes the majority of outbound handling costs as a component of selling, general and administrative expenses. Outbound handling costs include costs associated with preparing goods to ship to customers and certain costs to operate the Company’s distribution facilities. These costs, included within selling, general and administrative expenses, were $5.4$8.0 million and $3.4$5.0 million for the three months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively, and $10.2$18.2 million and $7.0$12.0 million for the sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. The Company includes outbound freight costs associated with shipping goods to customers as a component of cost of goods sold.

Minority Investment

Beginning in January 2011, the Company has held a minority equity investment in Dome Corporation (“Dome”), its Japanese licensee. As of JuneSeptember 30, 2011, the carrying value of the Company’s investment was $16.1$14.8 million, and was

included in other long term assets on the consolidated balance sheet. The investment is accounted for under the cost method and is subject to foreign currency exchangetranslation rate fluctuations as it is held by the Company’s European subsidiary.

Management Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates, including estimates relating to assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from these estimates.

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

In June 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”)FASB issued an Accounting Standards Update which eliminates the option to report other comprehensive income and its components in the statement of changes in stockholders’ equity. It requires an entity to present total comprehensive income, which includes the components of net income and the components of other comprehensive income, either in a single continuous statement or in two separate but consecutive statements. This pronouncement is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2011. The Company believes the adoption of this pronouncement will not have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.

In May 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued an Accounting Standards Update which clarifies requirements for how to measure fair value and for disclosing information about fair value measurements common to accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and International Financial Reporting Standards. This guidance is effective for interim and annual periods beginning on or after December 15, 2011. The Company believes the adoption of this guidance will not have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.

3. Inventories

Inventories consisted of the following:

4. Acquisitions

In July 2011, the Company acquired approximately 400.0 thousand square feet of office space comprising part of its corporate headquarters for $60.5 million. The acquisition included land, buildings, building equipment and improvements, and third party lease related intangible assets. Prior to the acquisition, the Company leased approximately 170.0 thousand square feet of the acquired space, and the Company now leases an additional 66.4 thousand square feet. The Company intends to use this space for future expansion of its corporate headquarters. Since the acquisition, the Company has invested $1.9 million in additional improvements.

The acquisition included the assumption of a $38.6 million loan secured by the property and the remaining purchase price was paid in cash funded by the $25.0 million term loan borrowed in May 2011. The carrying value of the assumed loan approximated its fair value on the date of the acquisition. Refer to Note 5 for a discussion of the assumed loan and term loan. A $1.0 million deposit was paid upon signing the purchase agreement in November 2010.

The aggregate fair value of the acquisition was $63.8 million. The fair value was estimated using a combination of market, income and cost approaches. The acquisition was accounted for as a business combination, and as such the Company recognized a bargain purchase gain of $3.3 million as the amount by which the fair value of the net assets acquired exceeded the fair value of the purchase price.

In connection with this acquisition, the Company incurred acquisition related expenses of approximately $1.9 million. Both the acquisition related expenses and pre-tax bargain purchase gain were included in selling, general and administrative expenses on the consolidated statements of income during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011. This transaction is not expected to have a material impact to the Company’s consolidated statements of income in future periods.

The Company believes that it was able to negotiate the acquisition of the net assets for less than fair value because the seller marketed the property in a limited manner, and thus the property did not have adequate exposure to the market prior to the measurement date to allow for marketing activities that are usual and customary for real estate transactions. In addition, the Company was the majority tenant immediately prior to the acquisition and was willing and qualified to assume the secured loan. The recorded amounts are provisional and subject to change. The Company continues to evaluate the purchase price allocation, including the opening fair value allocation of property and equipment, and the value of lease related intangible assets.

5. Credit Facility and Long Term Debt

Credit Facility

In March 2011, the Company entered into a new $325.0 million credit facility with certain lending institutions and terminated its prior $200.0 million revolving credit facility in order to increase the Company’s available financing and to expand its lending syndicate. The credit facility has a term of four years and provides for a committed revolving credit line of up to $300.0 million, in addition to a $25.0 million term loan facility. The commitment amount under the revolving credit facility may be increased by an additional $50.0 million, subject to certain conditions and approvals as set forth in the credit agreement. The Company incurred and capitalized $1.6 million in deferred financing costs in connection with the credit facility.

In May 2011, the Company borrowed $25.0 million under the term loan facility to finance a portion of the purchase price for the acquisition of part of the Company’s corporate headquarters. The acquisition closed in July 2011.

The credit facility may be used for working capital and general corporate purposes and is collateralized by substantially all of the assets of the Company and certain of its domestic subsidiaries (other than their trademarks and the corporate headquarters that the Company purchased in July 2011) and by a pledge of 65% of the equity interests of certain of the Company’s foreign subsidiaries. Up to $5.0 million of the facility may be used to support letters of credit, of which none were outstanding as of JuneSeptember 30, 2011. The Company is required to maintain a certain leverage ratio and interest coverage ratio as set forth in the credit agreement. As of September 30, 2011, the Company was in compliance with these ratios. The credit agreement also provides the lenders with the ability to reduce the borrowing base, even if the Company is in compliance with all conditions of the credit agreement, upon a material adverse change to the business, properties, assets, financial condition or results of operations of the Company. The credit agreement contains a number of restrictions that limit the Company’s ability, among other things, and subject to certain limited

exceptions, to incur additional indebtedness, pledge its assets as security, guaranty obligations of third parties, make investments, undergo a merger or consolidation, dispose of assets, or materially change its line of business. In addition, the credit agreement includes a cross default provision whereby an event of default under other debt obligations, as defined in the credit agreement, will be considered an event of default under the credit agreement.

Borrowings under the credit facility bear interest based on the daily balance outstanding at LIBOR (with no rate floor) plus an applicable margin (varying from 1.25% to 1.75%) or, in certain cases a base rate (based on a certain lending institution’s Prime Rate or as otherwise specified in the credit agreement, with no rate floor) plus an applicable margin (varying from 0.25% to 0.75%). The credit facility also carries a commitment fee equal to the available but unused borrowings multiplied by an applicable margin (varying from 0.25% to 0.35%). The applicable margins are calculated quarterly and vary based on the Company’s leverage ratio as set forth in the credit agreement.

Upon entering into the credit facility in March 2011, the Company terminated its prior $200.0 million revolving credit facility. The prior revolving credit facility was collateralized by substantially all of the Company’s assets, other than its trademarks, and included covenants, conditions and other terms similar to the Company’s new credit facility.

No balances were outstandingIn May 2011, the Company borrowed $25.0 million under the current credit facility or prior revolving credit facility during the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, with the exception of the $25.0 million term loan facility previously mentioned.to finance a portion of the purchase price for the acquisition of part of the Company’s corporate headquarters. The interest rate on the $25.0 million term loan was 1.5% during the three and sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2011. The maturity date of the $25.0 million term loan is March 2015, which is the end of the credit facility term. In addition to the term loan, the Company borrowed $30.0 million under the revolving credit facility to fund seasonal working capital requirements. The $30.0 million balance is expected to be fully repaid prior to December 31, 2011. The interest rate under the revolving credit facility was 1.5% during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011. No balances were outstanding under the prior revolving credit facility during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010.

Long Term Debt

The Company has long term debt agreements with various lenders to finance the acquisition or lease of qualifying capital investments. Loans under these agreements are collateralized by a first lien on the related assets acquired. As these agreements are not committed facilities, each advance is subject to approval by the lenders. Additionally, these agreements include a cross default provision whereby an event of default under other debt obligations, including the Company’s credit

facility, will be considered an event of default under these agreements. These agreements require a prepayment fee if the Company pays outstanding amounts ahead of the scheduled terms. The terms of the credit facility limit the total amount of additional financing under these agreements to $40.0 million, of which $27.1$21.5 million was remaining as of JuneSeptember 30, 2011. At JuneSeptember 30, 2011, December 31, 2010 and JuneSeptember 30, 2010, the outstanding principal balance under these agreements was $11.9$16.1 million, $15.9 million and $15.6$18.5 million, respectively. Currently, advances under these agreements bear interest rates which are fixed at the time of each advance. The weighted average interest raterates on outstanding borrowings was 3.9%were 3.1% and 5.9%5.3% for the three months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively, and 4.0%4.2% and 5.9%5.7% for the sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

The Company monitors the financial health and stability of its lenders under the credit and long term debt facilities, however instability in the credit markets could negatively impact lenders and their ability to perform under their facilities.

In July 2011, in connection with the Company’s acquisition of a portion of its corporate headquarters, the Company assumed a $38.6 million nonrecourse loan secured by a mortgage on the acquired property. The acquisition of a portion of the Company’s corporate headquarters was accounted for as a business combination, and the carrying value of the loan secured by the acquired property approximates fair value. The assumed loan had an original term of approximately ten years with a scheduled maturity date of March 1, 2013. The loan includes a balloon payment of $37.3 million due at maturity, and may not be prepaid. The assumed loan is a nonrecourse loan with the lender’s remedies for non-performance limited to action against the acquired property and certain required reserves and a cash collateral account, except for nonrecourse carveouts related to fraud, breaches of certain representations, warranties or covenants, including those related to environmental matters, and other standard carveouts for a loan of this type. The loan requires certain minimum cash flows and financial results from the property, and if those requirements are not met, additional reserves may be required. The Company leases approximately 236.0 thousand square feet of the approximately 400.0 thousand square feet of office space on the property through an intercompany lease, and leases the remaining space to third party tenants. The Company will continue to expand and occupy additional space as it becomes available. The assumed loan requires prior approval of the lender for certain matters related to the property, including material leases, changes to property management, transfers of any part of the property and material alterations to the property. The loan has an interest rate of 6.73%. In connection with the assumed loan, the Company incurred and capitalized $0.8 million in deferred financing costs. As of September 30, 2011, the outstanding balance on the loan was $38.4 million. In addition, in connection with the assumed loan for the acquisition of its corporate headquarters, the Company was required to set aside $4.9 million in restricted cash in reserve and cash collateral accounts. As of September 30, 2011, $1.9 million was included in prepaid expenses and other current assets, and the remaining $3.0 million was included in other long term assets.

Interest expense was $0.3$1.6 million and $0.6$0.5 million for the three months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively, and $0.9$2.5 million and $1.1$1.7 million for the sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. Interest expense includes the amortization of deferred financing costs and interest expense under the credit and long term debt facilities.facilities, as well as the assumed loan discussed above.

5.6. Commitments and Contingencies

In July 2011, in connection with the acquisition of part of its corporate headquarters, the Company assumed a $38.6 million in debt attached toloan secured by the acquired property. The remaining purchase price was funded through a $25.0 million term loan. Refer to Note 135 for a discussion of the assumed debtloan and Note 4 for a discussion of the term loan.

There were no additional significant changes to the contractual obligations reported in the 2010 Form 10-K other than those which occur in the normal course of business.

6.7. Fair Value Measurements

Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date (an exit price). The fair value accounting guidance outlines a valuation framework, creates a fair value hierarchy in order to increase the consistency and comparability of fair value measurements and the related disclosures, and prioritizes the inputs used in measuring fair value as follows:

Level 1: Observable inputs such as quoted prices in active markets;

Level 2: Inputs, other than quoted prices in active markets, that are observable either directly or indirectly; and

Level 3: Unobservable inputs for which there is little or no market data, which require the reporting entity to

develop its own assumptions.

Financial assets and (liabilities) measured at fair value as of JuneSeptember 30, 2011 are set forth in the table below:

Fair values of the financial assets and liabilities listed above are determined using inputs that use as their basis readily observable market data that are actively quoted and are validated through external sources, including third-partythird party pricing services and brokers. The foreign currency forward contracts represent gains and losses on derivative contracts, which are the net difference between the currency to be received or paid at each contract’s settlement date and the value of the foreign currency to be sold or purchased at the current forward exchange rate. The fair value of the TOLI held by the Rabbi Trust is based on the cash-surrender value of the life insurance policies, which are invested primarily in mutual funds and a separately managed fixed income fund. These investments are in the same funds and purchased in substantially the same amounts as the selected investments of participants in the Deferred Compensation Plan, which represent the underlying liabilities to participants in this plan. Obligations under the Deferred Compensation Plan are recorded at amounts due to participants, based on the fair value of participants’ selected investments.

7.8. Stock-Based Compensation

In February 2011, 0.3 million performance-based restricted stock units were awarded to certain executives and key employees under the 2005 Amended and Restated Omnibus Long-Term Incentive Plan. The performance-based restricted stock units have vesting that is tied to the achievement of a certain combined annual operating income target for 2012 and 2013. Upon the achievement of the combined operating income target, 50% of the restricted stock units will vest on February 15, 2014 and the remaining 50% will vest on February 15, 2015. If certain lower levels of combined operating income for 2012 and 2013 are achieved, fewer or no restricted stock units will vest at that time and one year later, and the remaining restricted stock units will be forfeited. As of JuneSeptember 30, 2011, the Company had not begun recording stock-based compensation expense for these performance-based restricted stock units as the Company determined the achievement of the combined operating income targets was not probable. The Company will assess the probability of the achievement of the operating income targets at the end of each reporting period. If it becomes probable that the performance targets related to these performance-based restricted stock units will be achieved, a cumulative adjustment will be recorded as if ratable stock-based compensation expense had been recorded since the grant date. Additional stock based compensation of up to $2.6$3.8 million would have been recorded through JuneSeptember 30, 2011 for these performance-based restricted stock units had the achievement of these operating income targets been deemed probable.

As of JuneSeptember 30, 2011, the Company had not begun recordinghas recorded stock-based compensation expense for a portionall of the performance-based stock options granted during 2010 as the Company determined the achievement of certain combined operating income targets for 2011 and 2012 was not probable. AdditionalDuring the three months ended September 30, 2011, a cumulative adjustment of $2.1 million was recorded as if ratable stock-based compensation of up to $2.1 million would havehad been recorded at June 30, 2011 hadsince the achievement of these operating income targets been deemed probable.grant date.

8.9. Foreign Currency Risk Management and Derivatives

The Company is exposed to gains and losses resulting from fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates relating to transactions generated by its international subsidiaries in currencies other than their local currencies. These gains and losses are primarily driven by intercompany transactions. From time to time, the Company may elect to enter into foreign currency forward contracts to reduce the risk associated with foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations on intercompany transactions and projected inventory purchases for its European and Canadian subsidiaries. In addition, the Company may elect to enter into foreign currency forward contracts to reduce the risk associated with foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations on Pound Sterling denominated balance sheet items.

As of JuneSeptember 30, 2011, the notional value of the Company’s outstanding foreign currency forward contractcontracts used to mitigate the foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations on its Canadian subsidiary’s intercompany transactions was $23.0$79.5 million with a contract maturitymaturities of 1 month. As of JuneSeptember 30, 2011, the notional value of the Company’s outstanding foreign currency forward contracts used to mitigate the foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations on its European subsidiary’s intercompany transactions was $45.0$48.0 million with contract maturities of 1 month. As of JuneSeptember 30, 2011, the notional value of the Company’s outstanding foreign currency forward contractscontract used to mitigate the foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations on Pounds Sterling denominated balance sheet items was $4.8€3.5 million, or $4.6 million, with a contract maturitiesmaturity of 1 month. The foreign currency forward contracts are not designated as cash flow hedges, and accordingly, changes in their fair value are recorded in other expense, net. As of JuneSeptember 30, 2011, and December 31, 2010, the fair values of the Company’s foreign

currency forward contracts were liabilities of $1.1 million and $0.6 million, respectively, and were included in accrued expenses on the consolidated balance sheets. As of June 30, 2010, the fair values of the Company’s foreign currency forward contracts were assets of $0.6$0.5 million, and were included in prepaid expenses and other current assets on the consolidated balance sheet. As of December 31, 2010 and September 30, 2010, the fair values of the Company’s foreign currency forward contracts were liabilities of $0.6 million and $0.3 million, respectively, and were

included in accrued expenses on the consolidated balance sheets. Refer to Note 67 for a discussion of the fair value measurements. Included in other expense, net were the following amounts related to changes in foreign currency exchange rates and derivative foreign currency forward contracts:

The Company enters into foreign currency forward contracts with major financial institutions with investment grade credit ratings and is exposed to credit losses in the event of non-performance by these financial institutions. This credit risk is generally limited to the unrealized gains in the foreign currency forward contracts. However, the Company monitors the credit quality of these financial institutions and considers the risk of counterparty default to be minimal.

9.10. Provision for Income Taxes

The Company recorded $4.5$26.2 million and $2.6$21.1 million of income tax expense for the three months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively, and $12.4$38.6 million and $7.8$28.9 million of income tax expense for the sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

As of September 30, 2011, the Company had $11.4 million in deferred tax assets associated with foreign net operating loss carryforwards for its European subsidiary which will begin to expire in 4 to 9 years. During 2010, the Company recorded a valuation allowance against a portion of this foreign net operating loss carryforward. As of September 30, 2011, the Company believed it was more likely than not that the full amount of the foreign net operating loss carryforwards would be realized due to favorable developments in the Company’s ongoing tax planning strategies. As a result the Company has reversed the valuation allowance resulting in a decrease of $1.8 million to income tax expense for the three and nine months ending September 30, 2011. Although realization of these foreign net operating loss carryforwards is not assured, the Company believes it is more likely than not that the full $11.4 million will be realized. This realizable amount could be decreased if future taxable income during the carryforward periods is increased or reduced.

The effective rates for income taxes were 40.2%37.5% and 42.3%38.9% for the sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. The effective tax rate for the sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2011 was lower than the effective tax rate for the sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2010 primarily due to decreased losses in foreign subsidiaries, federal tax credits forecasted in 2011 which were not forecasted during the second quarterreversal of 2010 and a reduction in the portion of income subject to state taxes.valuation allowance discussed above. The Company’s annual 2011 effective tax rate is expected to be approximately 40.0%38.4%.

10. Comprehensive Income

Comprehensive income by period is stated below:

11. Earnings per Share

The following represents a reconciliation from basic earnings per share to diluted earnings per share:

Effects of potentially dilutive securities are presented only in periods in which they are dilutive. Stock options and restricted stock units representing 47.546.5 thousand and 82.0755.2 thousand shares of common stock outstanding for the three and six months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively, were excluded from the computation of diluted earnings per share because their effect would have been anti-dilutive. Stock options and restricted stock units representing 58.7 thousand shares of common stock outstanding for the nine months ended September 30, 2011, and stock options, restricted stock units and warrants representing 1.31.1 million shares of common stock outstanding for each of the three and sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2010, were excluded from the computation of diluted earnings per share because their effect would have been anti-dilutive.

12. Segment Data and Related Information

The Company’s operating segments are based on how the Chief Operating Decision Maker (“CODM”) makes decisions about allocating resources and assessing performance. As such, the CODM receives discrete financial information by geographic region based on the Company’s strategy to become a global brand. These geographic regions include North America; Latin America; Europe, the Middle East and Africa (“EMEA”); and Asia. The Company’s operating segments are based on these geographic regions. Each geographic segment operates exclusively in one industry: the development, marketing and distribution of branded performance apparel, footwear and accessories. Due to the insignificance of the EMEA, Latin America and Asia operating segments, they have been combined into other foreign countries for disclosure purposes.

The geographic distribution of the Company’s net revenues, operating income and total assets are summarized in the following tables based on the location of its customers and operations. Net revenues represent sales to external customers for each segment. In addition to net revenues, operating income is a primary financial measure used by the Company to evaluate performance of each segment. Intercompany balances were eliminated for separate disclosure and corporate expenses from North America have not been allocated to other foreign countries.