UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, DC 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

x	QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For The Quarterly Period Ended ~~September 30, 2011~~March 31, 2012

¨	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Commission File Number: 814-00702

HERCULES TECHNOLOGY GROWTH

CAPITAL, INC.

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)

Maryland

743113410

(State or Jurisdiction of

Incorporation or Organization)

(IRS Employer

Identification No.)

400 Hamilton Ave., Suite 310

Palo Alto, California

94301

(Address of Principal Executive Offices)

(Zip Code)

(650) 289-3060

(Registrant’s Telephone Number, Including Area Code)

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter periods that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this Chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes ¨ No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.


Large Accelerated Filer	¨	Accelerated Filer	x

Non-Accelerated Filer	¨	Smaller Reporting Company	¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No x

On ~~November 1, 2011,~~May 7, 2012, there were ~~43,811,939~~49,715,269 shares outstanding of the Registrant’s common stock, $0.001 par value.

HERCULES TECHNOLOGY GROWTH CAPITAL, INC.

FORM 10-Q TABLE OF CONTENTS


PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION		3

Item 1.	Consolidated Financial Statements	3

	Consolidated Statement of Assets and Liabilities as of ~~September 30, 2011~~March 31, 2012 (unaudited) and December 31, ~~2010~~2011	3

	Consolidated Schedule of Investments as of ~~September 30, 2011~~March 31, 2012 (unaudited)	4

	Consolidated Schedule of Investments as of December 31, ~~2010~~2011	1920

	Consolidated Statement of Operations for the ~~three~~three-month periods ended March 31, 2012 and ~~nine month period ended September 30,~~ 2011 ~~and 2010~~ (unaudited)	3234

	Consolidated Statement of Changes in Net Assets for the ~~nine-month~~three-month periods ended ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2012 and 2011 ~~and 2010~~ (unaudited)	3335

	Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows for the ~~nine-month~~three-month periods ended ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2012 and 2011 ~~and 2010~~ (unaudited)	3436

	Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)	3537

Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	5056

Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	7080

Item 4.	Controls and Procedures	7181

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION		7382

Item 1.	Legal Proceedings	7382

Item 1A.	Risk Factors	7382

Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	7785

Item 3.	Defaults Upon Senior Securities	7785

Item 4.	~~Reserved~~Mine Safety Disclosures	7785

Item 5.	Other Information	7785

Item 6.	Exhibits	7785

SIGNATURES		7886

PART I: FINANCIAL INFORMATION

In this Quarterly Report, the “Company,” “Hercules,” “we,” “us” and “our” refer to Hercules Technology Growth Capital, Inc. and its wholly owned subsidiaries and its affiliated securitization trusts unless the context otherwise requires.

ITEM 1.

CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

HERCULES TECHNOLOGY GROWTH CAPITAL, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF ASSETS AND LIABILITIES

(unaudited)

(dollars in thousands, except per share data)


	September 30,						March 31,
	2011			December 31,			2012			December 31,
	(unaudited)			2010			(unaudited)			2011
Assets
Investments:
Non-Control/Non-Affiliate investments (cost of $572,558 and $445,782, respectively)	$	573,494		$	428,782
Affiliate investments (cost of $3,236 and $2,880, respectively)		—			3,069
Control investments (cost of $11,611 and $31,743, respectively)		2,983			40,181
Non-control/Non-affiliate investments (cost of $681,242 and $642,038, respectively)							$	692,695		$	651,843
Affiliate investments (cost of $3,254 and $3,236, respectively)								1,094			—
Control investments (cost of $10,889 and $11,266, respectively)								675			1,027

Total investments, at value (cost of $587,405 and $480,405, respectively)		576,477			472,032
Total investments, at value (cost of $695,385 and $656,540, respectively)								694,464			652,870
Cash and cash equivalents		96,309			107,014			48,433			64,474
Interest receivable		4,667			4,520			5,962			5,820
Other assets		11,184			7,681			14,507			24,230

Total assets	$	688,637		$	591,247		$	763,366		$	747,394


Liabilities
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities	$	7,755		$	8,716		$	6,545		$	10,813
Wells Fargo Loan								—			10,187
Long-term Liabilities (Convertible Debt)								70,624			70,353
Long-term SBA Debentures		188,750			170,000			200,750			225,000
Long-term Liabilities (Convertible Debt)		70,082			—

Total liabilities		266,587			178,716			277,919			316,353
Commitments and Contingencies (Note 10)
Net assets consist of:
Common stock, par value		43			43			50			44
Capital in excess of par value		486,557			477,549			532,951			484,244
Unrealized depreciation on investments		(10,861	)		(8,038	)		(578	)		(3,431	)
Accumulated realized losses on investments		(47,604	)		(51,033	)		(40,165	)		(43,042	)
Distributions in excess of investment income		(6,085	)		(5,990	)		(6,811	)		(6,774	)

Total net assets	$	422,050		$	412,531			485,447			431,041

Total liabilities and net assets	$	688,637		$	591,247		$	763,366		$	747,394

Shares of common stock outstanding ($0.001 par value, 100,000,000 authorized)		43,908			43,444			49,721			43,853
Net asset value per share	$	9.61		$	9.50		$	9.76		$	9.83

See notes to ~~Consolidated Financial Statements~~consolidated financial statements (unaudited)

HERCULES TECHNOLOGY GROWTH CAPITAL, INC.

CONSOLIDATED SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS

~~September 30, 2011~~March 31, 2012

(unaudited)

(dollars in thousands)

Portfolio Company

Industry

Type of Investment⁽¹⁾

Principal
Amount

Cost⁽²⁾

Value⁽³⁾

Acceleron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
   Drug Discovery    Preferred Stock Warrants       $ 69       $ 878

Preferred Stock Warrants
      35       186

Preferred Stock Warrants
      39       85

Preferred Stock
      1,341       2,473




Total Acceleron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
            1,484       3,622
Anthera Pharmaceuticals Inc.
   Drug Discovery
Senior Debt
Matures September 2014
Interest rate Prime + 7.3% or
Floor rate of 10.55%
   $ 25,000       24,269       25,019

Common Stock Warrants
      541       378
Total Anthera Pharmaceuticals Inc.
      Common Stock Warrants       443       308




            25,253       25,705
Aveo Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
   Drug Discovery
Senior Debt
Matures June 2014
Interest rate Prime + 7.15% or
Floor rate of 11.9%
   $ 25,000       26,554       27,304

Common Stock
      842       2,583




Total Aveo Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
            27,396       29,887
Dicerna Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
   Drug Discovery
Senior Debt
Matures January 2015
Interest rate Prime + 5.75% or
Floor rate of 10.15%
   $ 7,000       6,986       6,986
      Preferred Stock Warrants       206       90

Preferred Stock Warrants
      31       26

Preferred Stock Warrants
      28       15

Preferred Stock Warrants
      187       143

Preferred Stock
      502       439




Total Dicerna Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
            7,940       7,699
EpiCept Corporation⁽⁵⁾
   Drug Discovery    Common Stock Warrants       4       13




Total EpiCept Corporation
            4       13
Horizon Therapeutics, Inc.
   Drug Discovery    Common Stock Warrants       231       1




Total Horizon Therapeutics, Inc.
            231       1
Inotek Pharmaceuticals Corp.
   Drug Discovery    Preferred Stock       1,500       —




Total Inotek Pharmaceuticals Corp.
            1,500       —
Merrimack Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
   Drug Discovery    Preferred Stock Warrants       155       1,115
      Preferred Stock       2,000       3,825




Total Merrimack Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
            2,155       4,940
Paratek Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
   Drug Discovery    Preferred Stock Warrants       137       140

Preferred Stock
      1,000       1,348




Total Paratek Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
            1,137       1,488


Portfolio Company	Industry	Type of Investment⁽¹⁾	Principal Amount		Cost⁽²⁾		Value⁽³⁾
Anthera Pharmaceuticals Inc.⁽³⁾	Drug Discovery & Development	Senior Debt Matures December 2014 Interest rate Prime + 7.30% or Floor rate of 10.55%	$	25,000	$	24,645	$	24,645
Aveo Pharmaceuticals, Inc.⁽³⁾	Drug Discovery & Development	Senior Debt Matures September 2015 Interest rate Prime + 7.15% or Floor rate of 11.90%	$	26,500		26,500		27,295
Cempra, Inc.⁽³⁾	Drug Discovery & Development	Senior Debt Matures December 2015 Interest rate Prime + 7.05% or Floor rate of 10.30%	$	10,000		9,757		9,757
Chroma Therapeutics, Ltd.⁽⁵⁾	Drug Discovery & Development	Senior Debt Matures November 2013 Interest rate Prime + 7.75% or Floor rate of 12.00%	$	6,693		7,131		7,271
Concert Pharmaceuticals, Inc.	Drug Discovery & Development	Senior Debt Matures October 2015 Interest rate Prime + 3.25% or Floor rate of 8.50%	$	20,000		19,478		19,478
Dicerna Pharmaceuticals, Inc.	Drug Discovery & Development	Senior Debt Matures January 2015 Interest rate Prime + 4.40% or Floor rate of 10.15%	$	12,000		11,706		11,806
NeurogesX, Inc.⁽³⁾	Drug Discovery & Development	Senior Debt Matures February 2015 Interest rate Prime + 6.25% or Floor rate of 9.50%	$	15,000		14,691		14,800
NextWave Pharmaceuticals, Inc.	Drug Discovery & Development	Senior Debt Matures June 2015 Interest rate Prime + 4.30% or Floor rate of 9.55%	$	6,000		5,940		5,940
Paratek Pharmaceuticals, Inc.	Drug Discovery & Development	Senior Debt Matures upon liquidation Interest rate Fixed 10.00%	$	45		45		45
PolyMedix, Inc.⁽³⁾	Drug Discovery & Development	Senior Debt Matures September 2013 Interest rate Prime + 7.10% or Floor rate of 12.35%	$	5,889		5,762		5,762

Total Debt Drug Discovery & Development (26.12%)*						125,655		126,799

See notes to ~~Consolidated Financial Statements~~consolidated financial statements (unaudited)

HERCULES TECHNOLOGY GROWTH CAPITAL, INC.

CONSOLIDATED SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS—(Continued)

~~September 30, 2011~~March 31, 2012

(unaudited)

(dollars in thousands)

Portfolio Company

Industry

Type of Investment⁽¹⁾
   Principal
Amount    Cost⁽²⁾    Value⁽³⁾
PolyMedix, Inc.
   Drug Discovery    Senior Debt

Matures September 2013
Interest rate Prime + 7.1% or
Floor rate of 12.35%
   $ 7,611       $ 7,394       $ 7,546

Common Stock Warrants
      480       78




Total PolyMedix, Inc.
            7,874       7,624
Portola Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
   Drug Discovery    Preferred Stock Warrants       152       285




Total Portola Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
            152       285




Total Drug Discovery (19.25%)*
            75,126       81,264




Affinity Videonet, Inc.
   Communications
& Networking    Preferred Stock Warrants       102       149




Total Affinity Videonet, Inc.
            102       149
E-band Communications, Corp.⁽⁶⁾
   Communications
& Networking
Convertible Senior Debt
Matures May 2013
Interest rate Fixed 6.00%
   $ 356       356       —

Preferred Stock
      2,880       —




Total E-Band Communications, Corp.
            3,236       —
IKANO Communications, Inc.
   Communications
& Networking    Preferred Stock Warrants       45       —

Preferred Stock Warrants
      72       —




Total IKANO Communications, Inc.
            117       —
Intelepeer, Inc.
   Communications
& Networking
Senior Debt
Matures May 2013
Interest rate Prime + 8.12% or
Floor rate of 11.37%
   $ 6,524       6,509       6,640

Senior Debt
Matures May 2012
Interest rate Prime + 4.25%
   $ 1,100       998       998

Preferred Stock Warrants
      102       123




Total Intelepeer, Inc.
            7,609       7,761
Neonova Holding Company
   Communications
& Networking    Preferred Stock Warrants       94       21

Preferred Stock
      250       197




Total Neonova Holding Company
            344       218
Pac-West Telecomm, Inc.
   Communications
& Networking
Senior Debt
Matures October 2014
Interest rate Prime + 7.50% or
Floor rate of 12.00%
   $ 4,369       4,164       4,164

Preferred Stock Warrants
      121       —




Total Pac-West Telecomm, Inc.
            4,285       4,164
PeerApp, Inc.
   Communications
& Networking
Senior Debt
Matures April 2013
Interest rate Prime + 7.5% or
Floor rate of 11.50%
   $ 2,072       2,091       2,112

Preferred Stock Warrants
      61       91




Total PeerApp, Inc.⁽⁵⁾
            2,152       2,203


Portfolio Company	Industry	Type of Investment⁽¹⁾	Principal Amount		Cost⁽²⁾		Value⁽³⁾
Intelepeer, Inc.	Communications & Networking	Senior Debt Matures May 2013 Interest rate Prime + 8.12%	$	4,146	$	4,014	$	4,097
		Senior Debt Matures December 2012 Interest rate Prime + 4.25%	$	1,100		1,100		1,058

Total Intelepeer, Inc.						5,114		5,155

OpenPeak, Inc.	Communications & Networking	Senior Debt Matures July 2015 Interest rate Prime + 8.75%	$	7,685		7,498		7,498
Pac-West Telecomm, Inc.	Communications & Networking	Senior Debt Matures October 2013 Interest rate Prime + 7.50% or Floor rate of 12.00%	$	4,074		3,943		3,885
PeerApp, Inc.⁽⁴⁾	Communications & Networking	Senior Debt Matures April 2013 Interest rate Prime + 7.50% or Floor rate of 11.50%	$	1,471		1,526		1,526
PointOne, Inc.	Communications & Networking	Senior Debt Matures April 2015 Interest rate Libor + 9.00% or Floor rate of 11.50%	$	7,733		7,559		7,375
		Senior Debt Matures September 2015 Interest rate Libor + 9.00% or Floor rate of 11.50%	$	375		369		355

Total PointOne, Inc.						7,928		7,730
Stoke, Inc.⁽⁴⁾	Communications & Networking	Senior Debt Matures May 2013 Interest rate Prime + 7.00% or Floor rate of 10.25%	$	2,192		2,164		2,186

Total Debt Communications & Networking (5.76%)*						28,173		27,980

See notes to ~~Consolidated Financial Statements~~consolidated financial statements (unaudited)

HERCULES TECHNOLOGY GROWTH CAPITAL, INC.

CONSOLIDATED SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS—(Continued)

~~September 30, 2011~~March 31, 2012

(unaudited)

(dollars in thousands)

Portfolio Company

Industry

Type of Investment⁽¹⁾
   Principal
Amount    Cost⁽²⁾    Value⁽³⁾
Peerless Network, Inc.
   Communications
& Networking    Preferred Stock Warrants       $ 95       $ 187

Preferred Stock
      1,000       2,370




Total Peerless Network, Inc.
            1,095       2,557
Ping Identity Corporation
   Communications
& Networking    Preferred Stock Warrants       52       410




Total Ping Identity Corporation
            52       410
PointOne, Inc.
   Communications
& Networking
Senior Debt
Matures April 2013
Interest rate Libor + 9.0% or
Floor rate of 11.50%
   $ 8,375       8,153       8,153
   Communications
& Networking    Common Stock Warrants       131       194




Total PointOne, Inc.
            8,284       8,347
Purcell Systems, Inc.
   Communications
& Networking    Preferred Stock Warrants       123       89




Total Purcell Systems, Inc.
            123       89
Seven Networks, Inc.
   Communications
& Networking    Preferred Stock Warrants       174       —




Total Seven Networks, Inc.
            174       —
Stoke, Inc⁽⁴⁾
   Communications
& Networking
Senior Debt
Matures May 2013
Interest rate Prime + 7.0% or
Floor rate of 10.25%
   $ 3,051       2,995       3,025
      Preferred Stock Warrants       53       68
      Preferred Stock Warrants       65       54
      Preferred Stock       500       500




Total Stoke, Inc.
            3,613       3,647
Tectura Corporation
   Communications
& Networking
Senior Debt
Matures December 2012
Interest rate 11%
   $ 8,125       9,324       9,209

Revolving Line of Credit
Matures July 2012
Interest rate 11%,
PIK interest 1.00%
   $ 17,207       17,332       17,332
      Preferred Stock Warrants       51       33




Total Tectura Corporation
            26,707       26,574




Total Communications & Networking (13.30%)*
            57,893       56,119




Atrenta, Inc.
   Software    Preferred Stock Warrants       102       368
      Preferred Stock Warrants       34       121
      Preferred Stock Warrants       95       174
      Preferred Stock       250       375




Total Atrenta, Inc.
            481       1,038
Blurb, Inc.
   Software    Preferred Stock Warrants       25       403
      Preferred Stock Warrants       298       400




Total Blurb, Inc.
            323       803


Portfolio Company	Industry	Type of Investment⁽¹⁾	Principal Amount		Cost⁽²⁾		Value⁽³⁾
Central Desktop, Inc.	Software	Senior Debt Matures April 2014 Interest rate Prime + 6.75% or Floor rate of 10.50%	$	2,713	$	2,628	$	2,669
Box.net, Inc.⁽⁴⁾	Software	Senior Debt Matures March 2015 Interest rate Prime + 3.75% or Floor rate of 7.50%	$	9,647		9,477		9,190
		Senior Debt Matures July 2014 Interest rate Prime + 5.25% or Floor rate of 8.50%	$	1,451		1,484		1,484
		Senior Debt Matures July 2016 Interest rate Prime + 5.13% or Floor rate of 8.88%	$	5,000		4,994		4,994

Total Box.net, Inc.						15,955		15,668

Clickfox, Inc.	Software	Senior Debt Matures July 2013 Interest rate Prime + 6.00% or Floor rate of 11.25%	$	3,416		3,359		3,387
Kxen, Inc.⁽⁴⁾	Software	Senior Debt Matures January 2015 Interest rate Prime + 5.08% or Floor rate of 8.33%	$	3,000		2,978		2,841
SugarSync Inc.	Software	Senior Debt Matures April 2015 Interest rate Prime + 4.50% or Floor rate of 8.25%	$	2,000		1,957		1,887
Tada Innovations, Inc.	Software	Senior Debt Matures June 2012 Interest rate Prime + 3.25% or Floor rate of 6.5%	$	100		95		95
White Sky, Inc.	Software	Senior Debt Matures June 2014 Interest rate Prime + 7.00% or Floor rate of 10.25%	$	1,293		1,254		1,267

Total Debt Software (5.73%)*						28,226		27,814

See notes to ~~Consolidated Financial Statements~~consolidated financial statements (unaudited)

HERCULES TECHNOLOGY GROWTH CAPITAL, INC.

CONSOLIDATED SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS—(Continued)

~~September 30, 2011~~March 31, 2012

(unaudited)

(dollars in thousands)

Portfolio Company

Industry

Type of Investment⁽¹⁾
   Principal
Amount    Cost⁽²⁾    Value⁽³⁾
Braxton Technologies, LLC.
   Software    Preferred Stock Warrants       $ 188       $ —




Total Braxton Technologies, LLC.
            188       —
Bullhorn, Inc.
   Software    Preferred Stock Warrants       43       188




Total Bullhorn, Inc.
            43       188
Central Desktop, Inc.
   Software
Senior Debt
Matures April 2014
Interest rate Prime + 6.75% or
Floor rate of 10.50%
   $ 3,000       2,872       2,872

Preferred Stock Warrants
      108       299




Total Central Desktop, Inc.
            2,980       3,171
Clickfox, Inc.
   Software    Senior Debt

Matures July 2013
Interest rate Prime + 6.00% or
Floor rate of 11.25%
   $ 4,565       4,462       4,553
      Preferred Stock Warrants       177       327
      Preferred Stock Warrants       152       296




Total Clickfox, Inc.
            4,791       5,176
Forescout Technologies, Inc.
   Software    Preferred Stock Warrants       99       47




Total Forescout Technologies, Inc.
            99       47
GameLogic, Inc.
   Software    Preferred Stock Warrants       92       —




Total GameLogic, Inc.
            92       —
HighRoads, Inc.
   Software    Preferred Stock Warrants       44       7




Total HighRoads, Inc.
            44       7
Kxen, Inc.
   Software
Senior Debt
Matures January 2015
Interest rate Prime + 5.08% or
Floor rate of 8.33%
   $ 3,000       2,938       2,938

Preferred Stock Warrants
      47       29




Total Kxen, Inc.
            2,985       2,967
RichRelevance, Inc.
   Software
Senior Debt
Matures January 2015
Interest rate Prime + 3.25% or
Floor rate of 7.50%
   $ 5,000       4,857       4,857

Preferred Stock Warrants
      98       23




Total RichRelevance, Inc.
            4,955       4,880
Rockyou, Inc.
   Software    Preferred Stock Warrants       117       7




Total Rockyou, Inc.
            117       7
Sportvision, Inc.
   Software    Preferred Stock Warrants       39       —




Total Sportvision, Inc.
            39       —
SugarSync Inc.
   Software
Senior Debt
Matures April 2015
Interest rate Prime + 4.50% or
Floor rate of 8.25%
   $ 2,000       1,946       1,946

Preferred Stock Warrants
      78       77




Total SugarSync Inc.
            2,024       2,023


Portfolio Company	Industry	Type of Investment⁽¹⁾	Principal Amount		Cost⁽²⁾		Value⁽³⁾
Maxvision Holding, LLC.⁽⁷⁾⁽⁸⁾	Electronics & Computer Hardware	Senior Debt Matures December 2013 Interest rate Prime + 8.25% or Floor rate of 12.00%, PIK interest 5.00%	$	4,048	$	3,999	$	—
		Senior Debt Matures December 2013 Interest rate Prime + 6.25% or Floor rate of 10.00%, PIK interest 2.00%	$	2,323		2,303		12

		Revolving Line of Credit Matures December 2013 Interest rate Prime + 6.25% or Floor rate of 10.00%	$	868		1,005		663

Total Maxvision Holding, LLC						7,307		675

Total Debt Electronics & Computer Hardware (0.14%)*						7,307		675

Althea Technologies, Inc.	Specialty Pharmaceuticals	Senior Debt Matures October 2013 Interest rate Prime + 7.70% or Floor rate of 10.95%	$	9,711		9,666		9,874
Pacira Pharmaceuticals, Inc.⁽³⁾⁽⁴⁾	Specialty Pharmaceuticals	Senior Debt Matures November 2014 Interest rate Prime + 6.25% or Floor rate of 11.00%	$	10,953		11,001		11,138
		Senior Debt Matures November 2014 Interest rate Prime + 8.65% or Floor rate of 12.65%	$	14,612		14,123		14,306

Total Pacira Pharmaceuticals, Inc.						25,124		25,444

Quatrx Pharmaceuticals Company	Specialty Pharmaceuticals	Convertible Senior Debt Matures March 2012 Interest rate 8.00%	$	1,888		1,888		2,354

Total Debt Specialty Pharmaceuticals (7.76%)*						36,678		37,672

Achronix Semiconductor Corporation	Semiconductors	Senior Debt Matures January 2015 Interest rate Prime + 10.60% or Floor rate of 13.85%	$	2,387		2,309		2,381
Kovio Inc.	Semiconductors	Senior Debt Matures March 2015 Interest rate Prime + 5.50% or Floor rate of 9.25%	$	1,250		1,221		1,156
		Senior Debt Matures March 2015 Interest rate Prime + 6.00% or Floor rate of 9.75%	$	3,000		2,923		2,805

Total Kovio Inc.						4,144		3,961

Total Debt Semiconductors (1.31%)*						6,453		6,342

See notes to ~~Consolidated Financial Statements~~consolidated financial statements (unaudited)

HERCULES TECHNOLOGY GROWTH CAPITAL, INC.

CONSOLIDATED SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS—(Continued)

~~September 30, 2011~~March 31, 2012

(unaudited)

(dollars in thousands)

Portfolio Company

Industry

Type of Investment⁽¹⁾
   Principal
Amount    Cost⁽²⁾    Value⁽³⁾
Unify Corporation
   Software    Common Stock Warrants       $ 1,434       $ 332




Total Unify Corporation
            1,434       332
White Sky, Inc.
   Software
Senior Debt
Matures June 2014
Interest rate Prime + 7.00% or
Floor rate of 10.25%
   $ 1,500       1,443       1,443
   Software    Preferred Stock Warrants       54       1




Total White Sky, Inc.
            1,497       1,444
WildTangent, Inc.
   Software    Preferred Stock Warrants       238       11




Total WildTangent, Inc.
            238       11




Total Software (5.23%)*
            22,330       22,094




Luminus Devices, Inc.
   Electronics &
Computer Hardware    Preferred Stock Warrants       183       —

Preferred Stock Warrants
      84       —

Preferred Stock Warrants
      334       —




Total Luminus Devices, Inc.
            601       —
Maxvision Holding, LLC⁽⁷⁾.
   Electronics &
Computer Hardware
Senior Debt
Matures December 2013
Interest rate Prime + 8.25% or
Floor rate of 12.00%,
PIK interest 5.00%
   $ 4,366       4,462       2,069

Senior Debt
Matures December 2013
Interest rate Prime + 6.25% or
Floor rate of 10.00%, PIK interest 2.00%
   $ 2,681       2,653       —

Revolving Line of Credit
Matures December 2013
Interest rate Prime + 6.25% or
Floor rate of 10.00%
   $ 923       914       914

Common Stock
      3,581       —




Total Maxvision Holding, LLC
            11,610       2,983
Shocking Technologies, Inc.
   Electronics &
Computer Hardware    Preferred Stock Warrants       63       57




Total Shocking Technologies, Inc.
            63       57
Spatial Photonics, Inc.⁽⁸⁾
   Electronics &
Computer Hardware    Preferred Stock Warrants       130       —

Preferred Stock
      768       —




Total Spatial Photonics Inc.
            898       —




Total Electronics & Computer Hardware (.72%)*
            13,172       3,040


Portfolio Company	Industry	Type of Investment⁽¹⁾	Principal Amount		Cost⁽²⁾		Value⁽³⁾
AcelRX Pharmaceuticals, Inc.⁽³⁾	Drug Delivery	Senior Debt Matures December 2014 Interest rate Prime + 3.25% or Floor rate of 8.50%	$	10,000	$	9,807	$	9,561
		Senior Debt Matures December 2014 Interest rate Prime + 3.25% or Floor rate of 8.50%	$	10,000		9,806		9,560

Total AcelRX Pharmaceuticals, Inc.						19,613		19,121

Alexza Pharmaceuticals, Inc.⁽³⁾⁽⁴⁾	Drug Delivery	Senior Debt Matures October 2013 Interest rate Prime + 6.5% or Floor rate of 10.75%	$	9,190		9,327		9,519
BIND Biosciences, Inc.	Drug Delivery	Senior Debt Matures July 2014 Interest rate Prime + 7.45% or Floor rate of 10.70%	$	4,707		4,510		4,651
Revance Therapeutics, Inc.	Drug Delivery	Senior Debt Matures March 2015 Interest rate Prime + 6.60% or Floor rate of 9.85%	$	22,000		21,510		21,641

Total Debt Drug Delivery (11.31%)*						54,960		54,932

Gelesis, Inc.	Therapeutic	Senior Debt Matures April 2013 Interest rate Prime + 8.75% or Floor rate of 12.00%	$	3,428		3,571		3,571
Gynesonics, Inc.	Therapeutic	Senior Debt Matures October 2013 Interest rate Prime + 8.25% or Floor rate of 11.50%	$	4,991		4,871		4,943
		Senior Debt Matures November 2012 Interest rate Fixed 8.00%	$	181		142		142

Total Gynesonics, Inc.						5,013		5,085

Oraya Therapeutics, Inc.⁽⁴⁾	Therapeutic	Senior Debt Matures March 2015 Interest rate Prime + 4.75% or Floor rate of 9.50%	$	7,500		7,236		7,236
Novasys Medical, Inc.	Therapeutic	Senior Debt Matures January 2013 Interest rate Fixed rate 8.00%	$	65		60		60

Total Debt Therapeutic (3.29%)*						15,880		15,952

See notes to ~~Consolidated Financial Statements~~consolidated financial statements (unaudited)

HERCULES TECHNOLOGY GROWTH CAPITAL, INC.

CONSOLIDATED SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS—(Continued)

~~September 30, 2011~~March 31, 2012

(unaudited)

(dollars in thousands)

Portfolio Company

Industry

Type of Investment⁽¹⁾
   Principal
Amount    Cost⁽²⁾    Value⁽³⁾
Aegerion Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
   Specialty
Pharmaceuticals
Senior Debt
Matures September 2014
Interest rate Prime + 5.65% or
Floor rate of 10.40%
   $ 10,000       $ 10,138       $ 10,325

Common Stock Warrants
      69       722

Common Stock
      1,093       1,825




Total Aegerion Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
            11,300       12,872
Althea Technologies, Inc.
   Specialty
Pharmaceuticals
Senior Debt
Matures October 2013
Interest rate Prime + 7.70% or
Floor rate of 10.95%
   $ 10,990       10,844       11,135

Preferred Stock Warrants
      309       362




Total Althea Technologies, Inc.
            11,153       11,497
Chroma Therapeutics, Ltd.⁽⁵⁾
   Specialty
Pharmaceuticals
Senior Debt
Matures September 2013
Interest rate Prime + 7.75% or
Floor rate of 12.00%
   $ 8,540       8,738       8,738

Preferred Stock Warrants
      490       344




Total Chroma Therapeutics, Ltd.
            9,228       9,082
Pacira Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
   Specialty
Pharmaceuticals
Senior Debt
Matures August 2014
Interest rate Prime + 6.25% or
Floor rate of 10.25%
   $ 11,250       11,237       11,237

Senior Debt
Matures August 2014
Interest rate Prime + 8.65% or
Floor rate of 12.65%
   $ 15,000       14,255       14,443

Common Stock Warrants
      1,086       584




Total Pacira Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
            26,578       26,264
Quatrx Pharmaceuticals Company
   Specialty
Pharmaceuticals
Convertible Senior Debt
Matures March 2012
Interest rate 8.00%
   $ 1,888       1,888       1,888

Preferred Stock Warrants
      220       —

Preferred Stock Warrants
      307       —

Preferred Stock
      750       —




Total Quatrx Pharmaceuticals Company             3,165       1,888




Total Specialty Pharmaceuticals (14.60%)*             61,424       61,603




Annie’s, Inc.    Consumer & Business
Products
Preferred Stock Warrants
      321       96




Total Annie’s, Inc.             321       96
IPA Holdings, LLC    Consumer & Business
Products
Preferred Stock Warrants
      275       24

Preferred Stock
      500       260




Total IPA Holding, LLC             775       284
Market Force Information, Inc.    Consumer & Business
Products
Preferred Stock Warrants
      24       105
      Preferred Stock       500       481




Total Market Force Information, Inc.             524       586


Portfolio Company	Industry	Type of Investment⁽¹⁾	Principal Amount		Cost⁽²⁾		Value⁽³⁾
Ahhha, Inc.	Internet Consumer & Business Services	Senior Debt Matures January 2015 Interest rate Fixed 10.00%	$	350	$	346	$	345
Blurb, Inc.	Internet Consumer & Business Services	Senior Debt Matures December 2015 Interest rate Prime + 5.25% or Floor rate 8.50%	$	8,000		7,589		7,589
NetPlenish	Internet Consumer & Business Services	Senior Debt Matures April 2015 Interest rate Fixed 10.00%	$	500		485		485
Reply! Inc.⁽⁴⁾	Internet Consumer & Business Services	Senior Debt Matures June 2015 Interest rate Prime + 6.87% or Floor rate of 10.12%	$	13,000		12,765		12,667
Tectura Corporation	Internet Consumer & Business Services	Senior Debt Matures December 2012 Interest rate 11.00%	$	5,625		6,829		6,829
		Revolving Line of Credit Senior Debt Matures August 2012 Interest rate 11.00%	$	1,802		1,889		1,889
		Revolving Line of Credit Matures July 2012 Interest rate 11.00% , PIK interest 1.00%	$	17,413		17,814		17,814

Total Tectura Corporation						26,532		26,532

Trulia, Inc.⁽⁴⁾	Internet Consumer & Business Services	Senior Debt Matures March 2015 Interest rate Prime + 2.75% or Floor rate of 6.00%	$	5,000		4,887		4,551
		Senior Debt Matures March 2015 Interest rate Prime + 5.50% or Floor rate of 8.75%	$	5,000		4,887		4,765

Total Trulia, Inc.						9,774		9,316

See notes to ~~Consolidated Financial Statements~~consolidated financial statements (unaudited)

HERCULES TECHNOLOGY GROWTH CAPITAL, INC.

CONSOLIDATED SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS—(Continued)

~~September 30, 2011~~March 31, 2012

(unaudited)

(dollars in thousands)

Portfolio Company

Industry

Type of Investment⁽¹⁾
   Principal
Amount    Cost⁽²⁾    Value⁽³⁾
TV Guide, Inc.    Consumer & Business
Products
Revolving Line of Credit
Matures October 2011
Interest rate Prime + 11.00% or
Floor rate of 13.00%
   $ 500       $ 479       $ 479




Total TV Guide, Inc.             479       479
Wageworks, Inc.    Consumer & Business
Products
Preferred Stock Warrants
      252       2,510
      Preferred Stock       250       390




Total Wageworks, Inc.             502       2,900




Total Consumer & Business Products (1.03%)*             2,601       4,345




Achronix Semiconductor Corporation    Semiconductors
Senior Debt
Matures January 2015
Interest rate Prime + 10.60% or
Floor rate of 13.85%
   $ 2,500       2,396       2,396
      Preferred Stock Warrants       160       152




Total Achronix Semiconductor Corporation             2,556       2,548
Enpirion, Inc.    Semiconductors
Preferred Stock Warrants
      157       —




Total Enpirion, Inc.             157       —
iWatt, Inc.    Semiconductors
Preferred Stock Warrants
      46       3
      Preferred Stock Warrants       51       1
      Preferred Stock Warrants       73       2
      Preferred Stock Warrants       458       7
      Preferred Stock       490       983




Total iWatt, Inc.             1,118       996
Kovio Inc.    Semiconductors
Senior Debt
Matures March 2015
Interest rate Prime + 5.50% or
Floor rate of 9.25%
   $ 1,250       1,213       1,213
      Preferred Stock Warrants       27       27




Total Kovio Inc.             1,240       1,240
NEXX Systems, Inc.    Semiconductors    Preferred Stock Warrants       297       1,330
      Preferred Stock       277       802




Total NEXX Systems, Inc.             574       2,132
Quartics, Inc.    Semiconductors    Preferred Stock Warrants       53       —




Total Quartics, Inc.             53       —


Portfolio Company	Industry	Type of Investment⁽¹⁾	Principal Amount		Cost⁽²⁾		Value⁽³⁾

Vaultlogix, Inc.	Internet Consumer & Business Services	Senior Debt Matures September 2016 Interest rate LIBOR + 8.50% or Floor rate of 10.00%, PIK interest 2.50%	$	7,500	$	7,484	$	7,370
		Senior Debt Matures September 2015 Interest rate LIBOR + 7.00% or Floor rate of 8.50%	$	11,350		11,211		10,950
		Revolving Line of Credit Matures September 2015 Interest rate Libor + 6.00% or Floor rate of 7.50%	$	300		285		280

Total Vaultlogix, Inc.						18,980		18,600

Votizen	Internet Consumer & Business Services	Senior Debt Matures February 2013 Interest rate Fixed 5.00%	$	100		100		100

Wavemarket, Inc.	Internet Consumer & Business Services	Senior Debt Matures September 2015 Interest rate Prime + 5.75% or Floor rate of 9.50%	$	10,000		9,759		9,759

Total Debt Internet Consumer & Business Services (17.59%)						86,330		85,393

Cha Cha Search, Inc.	Information Services	Senior Debt Matures February 2015 Interest rate Prime + 6.25% or Floor rate of 9.50%	$	3,000		2,935		2,822
InXpo, Inc.	Information Services	Senior Debt Matures March 2014 Interest rate Prime + 7.50% or Floor rate of 10.75%	$	2,875		2,812		2,812
Jab Wireless, Inc.	Information Services	Senior Debt Matures August 2016 Interest rate Prime + 5.25% or Floor rate of 6.75%	$	20,272		20,012		20,012
RichRelevance, Inc.	Information Services	Senior Debt Matures January 2015 Interest rate Prime + 3.25% or Floor rate of 7.50%	$	5,000		4,902		4,699

Total Debt Information Services (6.25%)						30,661		30,345

Optiscan Biomedical, Corp.	Medical Device & Equipment	Senior Debt Matures December 2013 Interest rate Prime + 8.20% or Floor rate of 11.45%	$	10,750		11,016		11,193

Total Debt Medical Device & Equipment (2.31%)*						11,016		11,193

Navidea Biopharmaceuticals, Inc. (pka Neoprobe)⁽³⁾	Diagnostic	Senior Debt Matures December 2014 Interest rate Prime + 6.75% or Floor rate of 10.00%	$	7,000		6,764		6,764

Total Debt Diagnostic (1.39%)						6,764		6,764

See notes to ~~Consolidated Financial Statements~~consolidated financial statements (unaudited)

HERCULES TECHNOLOGY GROWTH CAPITAL, INC.

CONSOLIDATED SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS—(Continued)

~~September 30, 2011~~March 31, 2012

(unaudited)

(dollars in thousands)

Portfolio Company

Industry

Type of Investment⁽¹⁾
   Principal
Amount    Cost⁽²⁾    Value⁽³⁾
Total Semiconductors (1.64%)*             $ 5,698       $ 6,916




AcelRX Pharmaceuticals, Inc.    Drug
Delivery
Senior Debt
Matures December 2014
Interest rate Prime + 3.25% or
Floor rate of 8.50%
   $ 5,000       4,889       4,889

Senior Debt
Matures December 2014
Interest rate Prime + 3.25% or
Floor rate of 8.50%
   $ 5,000       4,889       4,889
      Common Stock Warrants       178       102
      Common Stock Warrants       178       102




Total AcelRX Pharmaceuticals, Inc.             10,134       9,982
Alexza Pharmaceuticals, Inc.⁽⁴⁾    Drug
Delivery
Senior Debt
Matures October 2013
Interest rate Prime + 6.5% or
Floor rate of 10.75%
   $ 11,770       11,699       12,121
      Preferred Stock Warrants       645       103




Total Alexza Pharmaceuticals, Inc.             12,344       12,224
BIND Biosciences, Inc.    Drug
Delivery
Senior Debt
Matures July 2014
Interest rate Prime + 7.45% or
Floor rate of 10.70%
   $ 5,000       4,655       4,805
      Preferred Stock Warrants       53       75
      Preferred Stock Warrants       50       76
      Preferred Stock Warrants       188       312




Total BIND Biosciences, Inc.             4,946       5,268
Labopharm USA, Inc.⁽⁵⁾    Drug
Delivery
Senior Debt
Matures December 2012
Interest rate 10.95%
   $ 9,771       9,718       9,718

Senior Debt
Matures December 2012
Interest rate Prime + 3.20% or
Floor rate of 10.95%
   $ 3,257       3,417       3,417




Total Labopharm USA, Inc.             13,135       13,135
Merrion Pharmaceuticals, Inc.⁽⁵⁾    Drug
Delivery
Senior Debt
Matures January 2015
Interest rate Prime + 9.20% or
Floor rate of 12.45%
   $ 5,000       4,735       3,870
      Common Stock Warrants       213       23




Total Merrion Pharmaceuticals, Inc.             4,948       3,893
Transcept Pharmaceuticals, Inc.    Drug
Delivery    Common Stock Warrants       36       57
      Common Stock Warrants       51       86
      Common Stock       500       275




Total Transcept Pharmaceuticals, Inc.             587       418
Revance Therapeutics, Inc.    Drug
Delivery
Senior Debt
Matures March 2015
Interest rate Prime + 6.60% or
Floor rate of 9.85%
   $ 22,000       21,257       21,257

Preferred Stock Warrants
      557       557




Total Revance Therapeutics, Inc.
            21,814       21,814




Total Drug Delivery (15.81%)*
      67,908       66,734


Portfolio Company	Industry	Type of Investment⁽¹⁾	Principal Amount		Cost⁽²⁾			Value⁽³⁾
deCODE genetics ehf.⁽⁵⁾	Biotechnology Tools	Senior Debt Matures September 2014 Interest rate Prime + 10.25% or Floor rate of 13.50%, PIK interest 2.00%	$	5,000	$	4,750		$	4,900
Labcyte, Inc.	Biotechnology Tools	Senior Debt Matures May 2013 Interest rate Prime + 8.60% or Floor rate of 11.85%	$	2,020		2,051			2,090

Total Debt Biotechnology Tools (1.44%)*						6,801			6,990

ScriptSave (Medical Security Card Company, LLC)	Healthcare Services, Other	Senior Debt Matures January 2016 Interest rate Prime + 8.75% or Floor rate of 11.25%	$	19,133		18,826			19,180
MedCall	Healthcare Services, Other	Senior Debt Matures January 2016 Interest rate 7.79% or Floor rate of 9.50%	$	5,168		5,063			5,063
Pacific Child & Family Associates, LLC	Healthcare Services, Other	Senior Debt Matures January 2015 Interest rate LIBOR + 8.00% or Floor rate of 10.50%	$	4,319		4,327			4,465
		Revolving Line of Credit Matures January 2015 Interest rate LIBOR + 6.50% or Floor rate of 9.00%	$	1,500		1,486			1,385
		Senior Debt Matures January 2015 Interest rate LIBOR + 10.50% or Floor rate of 13.00%, PIK interest 3.75%	$	5,900		6,335			6,512

Total Pacific Child & Family Associates, LLC						12,148			12,362

Total Debt Health Services, Other (7.54%)						36,037	��		36,605

Entrigue Surgical, Inc.	Surgical Devices	Senior Debt Matures December 2014 Interest rate Prime + 5.90% or Floor rate of 9.65%	$	3,000		2,901			2,939
Transmedics, Inc.⁽⁴⁾	Surgical Devices	Senior Debt Matures February 2014 Interest rate Prime + 9.70% or Floor rate of 12.95%	$	8,375		8,647			8,647

Total Debt Surgical Devices (2.39%)*						11,548			11,586

See notes to ~~Consolidated Financial Statements~~consolidated financial statements (unaudited)

HERCULES TECHNOLOGY GROWTH CAPITAL, INC.

CONSOLIDATED SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS—(Continued)

~~September 30, 2011~~March 31, 2012

(unaudited)

(dollars in thousands)

Portfolio Company

Industry

Type of Investment⁽¹⁾
   Principal
Amount    Cost⁽²⁾    Value⁽³⁾
BARRX Medical, Inc.
   Therapeutic
Senior Debt
Matures December 2011
Interest rate 11.00%
   $ 768       $ 1,295       $ 1,295

Preferred Stock Warrants
      76       110

Preferred Stock
      1,501       2,607




Total BARRX Medical, Inc.
            2,872       4,012
EKOS Corporation
   Therapeutic
Preferred Stock Warrants
      175       —

Preferred Stock Warrants
      153       —




Total EKOS Corporation
            328       —
Gelesis, Inc.⁽⁸⁾
   Therapeutic
Senior Debt
Matures April 2013
Interest rate Prime + 4.65% or
Floor rate of 10.75%
   $ 2,771       2,820       —




Total Gelesis, Inc.
            2,820       —
Gynesonics, Inc.
   Therapeutic
Senior Debt
Matures October 2013
Interest rate Prime + 8.25% or
Floor rate of 11.50%
   $ 5,846       5,775       5,842

Preferred Stock Warrants
      228       240

Preferred Stock
      532       451




Total Gynesonics, Inc.
            6,535       6,533
Light Science Oncology, Inc.
   Therapeutic    Preferred Stock Warrants       99       176




Total Light Science Oncology, Inc.
            99       176
Novasys Medical, Inc.
   Therapeutic    Preferred Stock Warrants       71       —

Preferred Stock Warrants
      54       1
   Preferred Stock       1,000       1,001




Total Novasys Medical, Inc.
            1,125       1,002
Oraya Therapeutics, Inc.
   Therapeutic
Senior Debt
Matures March 2015
Interest rate Prime + 4.75% or
Floor rate of 9.50%
   $ 7,500       7,317       7,317
      Preferred Stock Warrants       232       232




Total Oraya Therapeutics, Inc.
            7,549       7,549
Pacific Child & Family Associates, LLC
   Therapeutic
Senior Debt
Matures January 2015
Interest rate LIBOR + 8.0% or
Floor rate of 10.50%
   $ 5,685       5,592       5,592

Revolving Line of Credit
Matures January 2015
Interest rate LIBOR + 6.5% or
Floor rate of 9.00%
   $ 1,500       1,483       1,396

Senior Debt
Matures January 2015
Interest rate LIBOR + 10.50% or
Floor rate of 13.0%, PIK
interest 3.75%
   $ 5,900       6,185       6,302




Total Pacific Child & Family Associates, LLC
            13,260       13,290
Total Therapeutic (7.72%)*
            34,588       32,562


Portfolio Company	Industry	Type of Investment⁽¹⁾	Principal Amount		Cost⁽²⁾		Value⁽³⁾
Women’s Marketing, Inc.	Media/ Content/ Info	Senior Debt Matures May 2016 Interest rate Libor + 9.50% or Floor rate of 12.00%, PIK interest 3.00%	$	10,000	$	10,046	$	10,246
		Senior Debt Matures November 2015 Interest rate Libor + 7.50% or Floor rate of 10.00%	$	9,464		9,276		9,475
		Senior Debt Matures November 2015 Interest rate Libor + 7.50% or Floor rate of 10.00%	$	9,703		9,511		9,312

Total Women’s Marketing, Inc.						28,833		29,033
Westwood One Communications	Media/Content/ Info	Senior Debt Matures October 2016 Interest rate of 8.00%	$	20,869		19,040		19,458

Total Debt Media/Content/Info (9.99%)*						47,873		48,491

Alphabet Energy, Inc.	Clean Tech	Senior Debt Matures February 2015 Interest rate Prime + 5.75% or Floor rate of 9.00%	$	104		100		100
BrightSource Energy, Inc.	Clean Tech	Senior Debt Matures November 2012 Interest rate Prime + 7.25% or Floor rate of 10.50%	$	35,000		35,551		35,551
EcoMotors, Inc.	Clean Tech	Senior Debt Matures February 2014 Interest rate Prime + 6.10% or Floor rate of 9.35%	$	4,364		4,321		4,362
Enphase Energy, Inc.⁽³⁾	Clean Tech	Senior Debt Matures June 2014 Interest rate Prime + 5.75% or Floor rate of 9.00%	$	4,898		4,812		4,724
Integrated Photovoltaics, Inc.	Clean Tech	Senior Debt Matures February 2015 Interest rate Prime + 7.38% or Floor rate of 10.63%	$	3,000		2,886		2,886
NanoSolar, Inc.	Clean Tech	Senior Debt Matures September 2014 Interest rate Prime + 7.75% or Floor rate of 11.00%	$	8,488		8,156		8,155
Propel Biofuels, Inc.	Clean Tech	Senior Debt Matures September 2013 Interest rate of 11.00%	$	1,155		1,201		1,179
SCIenergy, Inc.⁽⁴⁾	Clean Tech	Senior Debt Matures October 2014 Interest rate 6.25%	$	202		202		202
		Senior Debt Matures August 2015 Interest rate Prime + 4.90% or Floor rate of 8.15%	$	5,000		4,892		4,875

Total SCIenergy, Inc.						5,094		5,077
Solexel, Inc.	Clean Tech	Senior Debt Matures June 2013 Interest rate Prime + 8.25% or Floor rate of 11.50%	$	6,867		451		446
		Senior Debt Matures June 2013 Interest rate Prime + 7.25% or Floor rate of 10.50%	$	791		7,155		7,155

Total Solexel, Inc.						7,606		7,601

Stion Corporation	Clean Tech	Senior Debt Matures February 2015 Interest rate Prime + 6.75% or Floor rate of 10.00%	$	9,757		9,456		9,456

Total Debt Clean Tech (16.29%)*						79,183		79,091

Total Debt (126.61%)						619,545		614,624

See notes to ~~Consolidated Financial Statements~~consolidated financial statements (unaudited)

HERCULES TECHNOLOGY GROWTH CAPITAL, INC.

CONSOLIDATED SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS—(Continued)

~~September 30, 2011~~March 31, 2012

(unaudited)

(dollars in thousands)

Portfolio Company

Industry

Type of Investment⁽¹⁾
   Principal
Amount    Cost⁽²⁾    Value⁽³⁾
Cozi Group, Inc.
   Internet Consumer
& Business Services

Preferred Stock Warrants
      $ 147       $ —

Preferred Stock
      177       48




Total Cozi Group, Inc.
            324       48
Invoke Solutions, Inc.
   Internet Consumer
& Business Services

Preferred Stock Warrants
      56       —

Preferred Stock Warrants
      26       —




Total Invoke Solutions, Inc.
            82       —
InXpo, Inc.
   Internet Consumer
& Business Services

Senior Debt
Matures March 2014
Interest rate Prime + 7.5% or
Floor rate of 10.75%
   $ 3,500       3,403       3,403

Preferred Stock Warrants
      98       82




Total InXpo, Inc.
            3,501       3,485
Prism Education Group, Inc.
   Internet Consumer
& Business Services

Preferred Stock Warrants
      43       109




Total Prism Education Group, Inc.
            43       109
RazorGator Interactive Group, Inc.
   Internet Consumer
& Business Services

Preferred Stock Warrants
      13       —

Preferred Stock Warrants
      28       —

Preferred Stock Warrants
      1,183       —

Preferred Stock
      1,000       —




Total RazorGator Interactive Group, Inc.
            2,224       —
Reply! Inc.⁽⁴⁾
   Internet Consumer
& Business Services

Senior Debt
Matures June 2015
Interest rate Prime + 6.87% or
Floor rate of 10.12%
   $ 13,000       12,862       12,862

Preferred Stock Warrants
      320       206




Total Reply! Inc.
            13,182       13,068
ScriptSave
(Medical Security Card Company, LLC)
   Internet Consumer
& Business Services

Senior Debt
Matures February 2016
Interest rate Prime + 8.75% or
Floor rate of 11.25%
   $ 20,158       19,786       20,391




Total ScriptSave
            19,786       20,391
Trulia, Inc.
   Internet Consumer
& Business Services

Senior Debt
Matures March 2015
Interest rate Prime + 2.75% or
Floor rate of 6.00%
   $ 5,000       4,856       4,856

Senior Debt
Matures March 2015
Interest rate Prime + 5.50% or
Floor rate of 8.75%
   $ 5,000       4,857       4,857

Preferred Stock Warrants
      188       187




Total Trulia, Inc.
            9,901       9,900

Portfolio Company

Industry

Type of Investment⁽¹⁾

Principal
Amount

Cost⁽²⁾

Value⁽³⁾

Acceleron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Drug Discovery
& Development

Common Stock Warrants

Preferred Stock Warrants

Series A

273

Preferred Stock Warrants

Series B

Total Warrants Acceleron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

143

366

Anthera Pharmaceuticals Inc.⁽³⁾

Drug Discovery
& Development

Common Stock Warrants

984

250

Cempra, Inc.⁽³⁾

Drug Discovery
& Development

Common Stock Warrants

187

Chroma Therapeutics, Ltd.⁽⁵⁾

Drug Discovery
& Development

Preferred Stock Warrants

Series D

490

500

Concert Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Drug Discovery
& Development

Preferred Stock Warrants

Series C

367

260

Dicerna Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Drug Discovery
& Development

Common Stock Warrants

—

Preferred Stock Warrants

Series A

236

Preferred Stock Warrants

Series B

311

170

Total Warrants Dicerna Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

575

228

EpiCept Corporation⁽³⁾

Drug Discovery
& Development

Common Stock Warrants

Horizon Pharma, Inc.⁽³⁾

Drug Discovery
& Development

Preferred Stock Warrants

Series C

231

—

Merrimack Pharmaceuticals, Inc.⁽³⁾

Drug Discovery
& Development

Common Stock Warrants

155

446

NeurogesX, Inc.⁽³⁾

Drug Discovery
& Development

Common Stock Warrants

503

302

NextWave Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Drug Discovery
& Development

Preferred Stock Warrants

Series A-1

126

129

Paratek Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Drug Discovery
& Development

Preferred Stock Warrants

Series F

137

PolyMedix, Inc.⁽³⁾

Drug Discovery
& Development

Common Stock Warrants

480

247

Portola Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Drug Discovery
& Development

Preferred Stock Warrants

Series B

152

270

Total Warrants Drug Discovery & Development (0.64%)*

4,534

3,088

Affinity Videonet, Inc.

Communications
& Networking

Preferred Stock Warrants

Series A

102

167

IKANO Communications, Inc.

Communications
& Networking

Preferred Stock Warrants

Series D

118

—

Intelepeer, Inc.

Communications
& Networking

Preferred Stock Warrants

Series C

102

216

Neonova Holding Company

Communications
& Networking

Preferred Stock Warrants

Series A

OpenPeak, Inc.

Communications
& Networking

Preferred Stock Warrants

Series E

149

Pac-West Telecomm, Inc.

Communications
& Networking

Common Stock Warrants

121

—

PeerApp, Inc.⁽⁴⁾

Communications
& Networking

Preferred Stock Warrants

Series B

Peerless Network, Inc.

Communications
& Networking

Preferred Stock Warrants

Series A

252

Ping Identity Corporation

Communications
& Networking

Preferred Stock Warrants

Series B

109

PointOne, Inc.

Communications
& Networking

Common Stock Warrants

131

Purcell Systems, Inc.

Communications
& Networking

Preferred Stock Warrants

Series B

123

116

Stoke, Inc.⁽⁴⁾

Communications
& Networking

Preferred Stock Warrants

Series C

103

Preferred Stock Warrants

Series D

Total Stoke, Inc.

118

146

Total Warrants Communications & Networking (0.25%)*

1,266

1,235

See notes to ~~Consolidated Financial Statements~~consolidated financial statements (unaudited)

HERCULES TECHNOLOGY GROWTH CAPITAL, INC.

CONSOLIDATED SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS—(Continued)

~~September 30, 2011~~March 31, 2012

(unaudited)

(dollars in thousands)

Portfolio Company

Industry

Type of Investment⁽¹⁾
   Principal
Amount    Cost⁽²⁾    Value⁽³⁾
Vaultlogix, Inc.
   Internet Consumer
& Business Services

Senior Debt
Matures September 2016
Interest rate Libor + 8.50% or
Floor rate of 10.00%,
PIK interest 2.50%
   $ 7,500       $ 7,382       $ 7,382

Senior Debt
Matures September 2015
Interest rate Libor + 7.00% or
Floor rate of 8.50%
   $ 11,500       11,309       11,309

Revolving Line of Credit
Matures September 2015
Interest rate Libor + 6.00% or
Floor rate of 7.50%
   $ 300       283       283




Total Vaultlogix, Inc.
            18,974       18,974




Total Internet Consumer & Business Services (15.63%)
         68,017       65,975




Lilliputian Systems, Inc.
   Energy
Preferred Stock Warrants
      106       —

Common Stock Warrants
      48       —




Total Lilliputian Systems, Inc.
            154       —




Total Energy (0.00%)*
            154       —




Box.net, Inc.
   Information Services
Senior Debt
Matures March 2015
Interest rate Prime + 3.75% or
Floor rate of 7.50%
   $ 4,808       4,686       4,686

Senior Debt
Matures July 2014
Interest rate Prime + 5.25% or
Floor rate of 8.50%
   $ 1,590       1,602       1,634

Preferred Stock Warrants
      73       1,998

Preferred Stock Warrants
      117       1,352

Preferred Stock Warrants
      194       191

Preferred Stock
      500       3,137

Preferred Stock
      1,500       2,272




Total Box.net, Inc.
            8,672       15,270
Buzznet, Inc.
   Information Services    Preferred Stock Warrants       9       —

Preferred Stock
      250       34




Total Buzznet, Inc.
            259       34
Cha Cha Search, Inc.
   Information Services
Senior Debt
Matures February 2015
Interest rate Prime + 6.25% or
Floor rate of 9.50%
   $ 3,000       2,916       2,916

Preferred Stock Warrants
      58       10




Total Cha Cha Search, Inc.
            2,974       2,926
XL Education Corp.
   Information Services    Common Stock       880       880




Total XL Education Corp.
            880       880
hi5 Networks, Inc.
   Information Services    Preferred Stock Warrants       213       —

Preferred Stock
      250       741




Total hi5 Networks, Inc.
            463       741
Jab Wireless, Inc.
   Information Services
Senior Debt
Matures August 2016
Interest rate Prime + 6.25% or
Floor rate of 6.75%
   $ 18,121       17,858       17,858
Jab Wireless, Inc.
   Information Services    Preferred Stock Warrants       265       281




Total Jab Wireless, Inc.
            18,123       18,139

Portfolio Company

Industry

Type of Investment⁽¹⁾

Principal
Amount

Cost⁽²⁾

Value⁽³⁾

Atrenta, Inc.

Software

Preferred Stock Warrants

Series C

136

651

Preferred Stock Warrants

Series D

227

Total Atrenta, Inc.

231

878

Box.net, Inc.⁽⁴⁾

Software

Preferred Stock Warrants

Series C

117

1,557

Preferred Stock Warrants

Series B

2,313

Preferred Stock Warrants

Series D-1

193

516

Total Box.net, Inc.

383

4,386

Braxton Technologies, LLC.

Software

Preferred Stock Warrants

Series A

188

—

Bullhorn, Inc.

Software

Preferred Stock Warrants

Series C

253

Central Desktop, Inc.

Software

Preferred Stock Warrants

Series B

108

360

Clickfox, Inc.

Software

Preferred Stock Warrants

Series B

329

541

Daegis Inc. (pka Unify Corporation)⁽³⁾

Software

Common Stock Warrants

1,434

124

Forescout Technologies, Inc.

Software

Preferred Stock Warrants

Series D

169

HighRoads, Inc.

Software

Preferred Stock Warrants

Series B

Kxen, Inc.⁽⁴⁾

Software

Preferred Stock Warrants

Series D

Rockyou, Inc.

Software

Preferred Stock Warrants

Series B

117

Sportvision, Inc.

Software

Preferred Stock Warrants

Series B

—

SugarSync Inc.

Software

Preferred Stock Warrants

Series D

135

Tada Innovations, Inc.

Software

Preferred Stock Warrants

Series A

White Sky, Inc.

Software

Preferred Stock Warrants

Series B-2

WildTangent, Inc.

Software

Preferred Stock Warrants

Series A-3

238

Total Warrants Software (1.43%)*

3,457

6,952

Luminus Devices, Inc.

Electronics &
Computer Hardware

Common Stock Warrants

601

—

Shocking Technologies, Inc.

Electronics &
Computer Hardware

Preferred Stock Warrants

Series A-1

112

Total Warrant Electronics & Computer Hardware (0.02%)*

664

112

Althea Technologies, Inc.

Specialty
Pharmaceuticals

Preferred Stock Warrants

Series D

309

416

Pacira Pharmaceuticals, Inc.(3)

Specialty
Pharmaceuticals

Common Stock Warrants

1,086

696

Quatrx Pharmaceuticals Company

Specialty
Pharmaceuticals

Preferred Stock Warrants

Series E

528

—

Total Warrants Specialty Pharmaceuticals (0.23%)*

1,923

1,112

Annie’s, Inc.(3)

Consumer &
Business Products

Common Stock Warrants

321

2,158

IPA Holdings, LLC

Consumer & Business
Products

Common Stock Warrants

275

117

Market Force Information, Inc.

Consumer & Business
Products

Preferred Stock Warrants

Series A

132

Seven Networks, Inc.

Consumer & Business
Products

Preferred Stock Warrants

Series C

174

—

Wageworks, Inc.

Consumer & Business
Products

Preferred Stock Warrants

Series C

252

1,710

WaveMarket, Inc.

Consumer & Business
Products

Preferred Stock Warrants

Series E

106

104

Total Warrant Consumer & Business Products (0.87%)*

1,152

4,221

See notes to ~~Consolidated Financial Statements~~consolidated financial statements (unaudited)

HERCULES TECHNOLOGY GROWTH CAPITAL, INC.

CONSOLIDATED SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS—(Continued)

~~September 30, 2011~~March 31, 2012

(unaudited)

(dollars in thousands)

Portfolio Company

Industry

Type of Investment⁽¹⁾
   Principal
Amount    Cost⁽²⁾    Value⁽³⁾
Solutionary, Inc.
   Information Services    Preferred Stock Warrants       $ 94       $ —

Preferred Stock Warrants
      2       —

Preferred Stock
      250       42




Total Solutionary, Inc.
            346       42
Intelligent Beauty, Inc.
   Information Services    Preferred Stock Warrants       230       90




Total Intelligent Beauty, Inc.
            230       90
Good Technologies, Inc.
   Information Services    Common Stock       603       95




Total Good Technologies, Inc.
            603       95
Zeta Interactive Corporation
   Information Services    Preferred Stock Warrants       172       110

Preferred Stock
      501       485




Total Zeta Interactive Corporation
            673       595




Total Information Services (9.20%)             33,223       38,812
Novadaq Technologies, Inc.⁽⁵⁾
   Diagnostic    Common Stock       1,415       808




Total Novadaq Technologies, Inc.⁽⁵⁾
            1,415       808
Optiscan Biomedical, Corp.
   Diagnostic
Senior Debt
Matures December 2013
Interest rate Prime + 8.20% or
Floor rate of 11.45%
   $ 10,750       10,792       11,162

Preferred Stock Warrants
      1,069       668

Preferred Stock
      3,656       2,251




Total Optiscan Biomedical, Corp.
            15,517       14,081




Total Diagnostic (3.53%)*
            16,932       14,889




deCODE genetics ehf.
   Biotechnology Tools
Senior Debt
Matures September 2014
Interest rate Prime + 10.25% or
Floor rate of 13.50%,
PIK interest 2.00%
   $ 5,000       4,740       4,740

Preferred Stock Warrants
      305       358




Total deCODE genetics ehf.
            5,045       5,098
Kamada, LTD.
   Biotechnology Tools    Common Stock       427       398




Total Kamada, LTD.
            427       398
Labcyte, Inc.
   Biotechnology Tools
Senior Debt
Matures May 2013
Interest rate Prime + 8.6% or
Floor rate of 11.85%
   $ 2,800       2,774       2,849

Common Stock Warrants
      192       190

Common Stock Warrants
      5       5




Total Labcyte, Inc.
            2,971       3,044
NeurogesX, Inc.
   Drug Discovery
Senior Debt
Matures February 2015
Interest rate Prime + 6.25% or
Floor rate of 9.50%
   $ 15,000       14,433       14,433

Common Stock Warrants
      503       132




Total NeurogesX, Inc.
            14,936       14,565

Portfolio Company

Industry

Type of Investment⁽¹⁾

Principal
Amount

Cost⁽²⁾

Value⁽³⁾

Achronix Semiconductor Corporation

Semiconductors

Preferred Stock Warrants

Series D

160

142

Enpirion, Inc.

Semiconductors

Preferred Stock Warrants

Series D

157

—

iWatt, Inc.

Semiconductors

Preferred Stock Warrants

Series C

Preferred Stock Warrants

Series D

583

Total iWatt, Inc.

629

Kovio Inc.

Semiconductors

Preferred Stock Warrants

Series B

NEXX Systems, Inc.

Semiconductors

Preferred Stock Warrants

Series D

297

3,654

Quartics, Inc.

Semiconductors

Preferred Stock Warrants

Series C

—

Total Warrants Semiconductors (0.79%)*

1,388

3,815

AcelRX Pharmaceuticals, Inc.⁽³⁾

Drug Delivery

Common Stock Warrants

356

221

Alexza Pharmaceuticals, Inc.⁽³⁾⁽⁴⁾

Drug Delivery

Common Stock Warrants

645

BIND Biosciences, Inc.

Drug Delivery

Preferred Stock Warrants

Series C-1

291

427

Merrion Pharma, Plc.⁽³⁾⁽⁵⁾

Drug Delivery

Common Stock Warrants

214

150

Revance Therapeutics, Inc.

Drug Delivery

Preferred Stock Warrants

Series D

557

443

Transcept Pharmaceuticals, Inc.⁽³⁾

Drug Delivery

Common Stock Warrants

270

Total Warrant Drug Delivery (0.32%)*

2,150

1,552

EKOS Corporation

Therapeutic

Preferred Stock Warrants

Series C

327

—

Gelesis

Therapeutic

Preferred Stock Warrants

Series A-1

Light Science Oncology, Inc.

Therapeutic

Preferred Stock Warrants

Series B

—

Novasys Medical, Inc.

Therapeutic

Preferred Stock Warrants

Series D

131

Oraya Therapeutics, Inc.⁽⁴⁾

Therapeutic

Preferred Stock Warrants

Series C

551

496

Total Warrants Therapeutic (0.12%)*

1,185

581

Blurb, Inc.

Internet Consumer
& Business Services

Preferred Stock Warrants

Series B

323

616

Preferred Stock Warrants

Series C

636

Total Blurb, Inc.

959

1,252

Cozi Group, Inc.

Internet Consumer
& Business Services

Preferred Stock Warrants

Series A

147

—

Invoke Solutions, Inc.

Internet Consumer
& Business Services

Common Stock Warrants

—

Prism Education Group, Inc.

Internet Consumer
& Business Services

Preferred Stock Warrants

Series B

—

RazorGator Interactive Group, Inc.

Internet Consumer
& Business Services

Preferred Stock Warrants

Series C

1,224

—

Reply! Inc.⁽⁴⁾

Internet Consumer
& Business Services

Preferred Stock Warrants

Series B

320

683

Trulia, Inc.⁽⁴⁾

Internet Consumer
& Business Services

Preferred Stock Warrants

Series D

188

728

Tectura Corporation

Internet Consumer
& Business Services

Preferred Stock Warrants

Series B-1

Total Warrants Internet Consumer & Business Services (0.55%)

3,014

2,675

See notes to ~~Consolidated Financial Statements~~consolidated financial statements (unaudited)

HERCULES TECHNOLOGY GROWTH CAPITAL, INC.

CONSOLIDATED SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS—(Continued)

~~September 30, 2011~~March 31, 2012

(unaudited)

(dollars in thousands)

Portfolio Company

Industry

Type of Investment⁽¹⁾
   Principal
Amount    Cost⁽²⁾    Value⁽³⁾
NuGEN Technologies, Inc.
   Biotechnology Tools    Preferred Stock Warrants       $ 45       $ 203

Preferred Stock Warrants
      33       15

Preferred Stock
      500       473




Total NuGEN Technologies, Inc.
            578       691




Total Biotechnology Tools (5.64%)*
            23,957       23,796




Entrigue Surgical, Inc.
   Surgical Devices
Senior Debt
Matures December 2014
Interest rate Prime + 5.90% or
Floor rate of 9.65%
   $ 3,000       2,863       2,863

Preferred Stock Warrants
      87       87




Total Entrigue Surgical, Inc.
            2,950       2,950
Transmedics, Inc.⁽⁴⁾
   Surgical Devices
Senior Debt
Matures February 2014
Interest rate Prime + 9.70% or
Floor rate of 12.95%
   $ 8,375       9,115       4,733

Preferred Stock Warrants
      225       —

Preferred Stock
      1,169       —




Total Transmedics, Inc.
            10,509       4,733




Total Surgical Devices (1.82%)*
            13,459       7,683




Glam Media, Inc.
   Media/Content/Info    Preferred Stock Warrants       482       138




Total Glam Media, Inc.
            482       138
Everyday Health, Inc. (Waterfront Media, Inc.)
   Media/Content/Info    Preferred Stock Warrants       60       364
      Preferred Stock       1,000       945




Total Everyday Health
            1,060       1,309
Women’s Marketing, Inc.
   Media/Content/Info
Senior Debt
Matures May 2016
Interest rate Libor + 9.50% or
Floor rate of 12.00%,
PIK interest 3.00%
   $ 10,000       9,866       9,866

Senior Debt
Matures November 2015
Interest rate Libor + 7.50% or
Floor rate of 10.0%
   $ 9,875       9,648       9,648

Senior Debt
Matures November 2015
Interest rate Libor + 7.50% or
Floor rate of 10.0%
   $ 10,125       9,891       9,891




Total Women’s Marketing, Inc.
            29,405       29,405




Total Media/Content/Info (7.31%)*
            30,947       30,852

Portfolio Company

Industry

Type of Investment⁽¹⁾

Principal
Amount

Cost⁽²⁾

Value⁽³⁾

Buzznet, Inc.

Information Services

Preferred Stock Warrants

Series B

—

Cha Cha Search, Inc.

Information Services

Preferred Stock Warrants

Series F

Intelligent Beauty, Inc.

Information Services

Preferred Stock Warrants

Series B

230

544

InXpo, Inc.

Information Services

Preferred Stock Warrants

Series C

Magi.com (pka Hi5 Networks, Inc.)

Information Services

Preferred Stock Warrants

Series B

213

—

Jab Wireless, Inc.

Information Services

Preferred Stock Warrants

Series A

265

334

RichRelevance, Inc.

Information Services

Preferred Stock Warrants

Series D

Solutionary, Inc.

Information Services

Preferred Stock Warrants

Series E

Zeta Interactive Corporation

Information Services

Preferred Stock Warrants

Series A

172

268

Total Warrants Information Services (0.26%)

1,239

1,267

Optiscan Biomedical, Corp.

Medical Device
& Equipment

Preferred Stock Warrants

Series B

680

407

Preferred Stock Warrants

Series C

390

375

Total Optiscan Biomedical, Corp

1,070

782

Total Warrants Medical Device & Equipment (0.16%)*

1,070

782

Navidea Biopharmaceuticals, Inc.
(pka Neoprobe)⁽³⁾

Diagnostic

Common Stock Warrants

244

318

Total Warrants Diagnostic (0.07%)

244

318

deCODE genetics ehf.⁽⁵⁾

Biotechnology Tools

Preferred Stock Warrants

Series A-2

305

298

Labcyte, Inc.

Biotechnology Tools

Preferred Stock Warrants

Series C

197

265

NuGEN Technologies, Inc.

Biotechnology Tools

Preferred Stock Warrants

Series B

130

Preferred Stock Warrants

Series C

Total NuGEN Technologies, Inc.

137

Total Warrants Biotechnology Tools (0.14%)*

580

700

Entrigue Surgical, Inc.

Surgical Devices

Preferred Stock Warrants

Series B

Transmedics, Inc.⁽⁴⁾

Surgical Devices

Preferred Stock Warrants

Series B

225

—

Gynesonics, Inc.

Surgical Devices

Preferred Stock Warrants

Series A

Preferred Stock Warrants

Series C

365

357

383

372

Total Warrants Surgical Devices (0.08%)*

695

413

Everyday Health, Inc. (pka Waterfront Media, Inc.)

Media/Content/Info

Preferred Stock Warrants

Series C

302

Glam Media, Inc.

Media/Content/ Info

Preferred Stock Warrants

Series D

482

Total Warrants Media/Content/Info (0.06%)*

542

308

Alphabet Energy, Inc.

Clean Tech

Preferred Stock Warrants

Series A

BrightSource Energy, Inc.

Clean Tech

Preferred Stock Warrants

Series D

675

638

Calera, Inc.

Clean Tech

Preferred Stock Warrants

Series C

513

148

EcoMotors, Inc.

Clean Tech

Preferred Stock Warrants

Series B

308

651

Enphase Energy, Inc.⁽³⁾

Clean Tech

Common Stock Warrants

102

GreatPoint Energy, Inc.

Clean Tech

Preferred Stock Warrants

Series D-1

548

217

Integrated Photovoltaics, Inc.

Clean Tech

Preferred Stock Warrants

Series A-1

444

Lilliputian Systems, Inc.

Clean Tech

Preferred Stock Warrants

Series C

106

—

Common Stock Warrants

—

Total Lilliputian Systems, Inc.

154

—

Propel Biofuels, Inc.

Clean Tech

Preferred Stock Warrants

Series C

211

100

SCIenergy, Inc.⁽⁴⁾

Clean Tech

Preferred Stock Warrants

Series C

138

Solexel, Inc.

Clean Tech

Preferred Stock Warrants

Series B

1,161

146

Stion Corporation

Clean Tech

Preferred Stock Warrants

Series E

317

334

Trilliant, Inc.

Clean Tech

Preferred Stock Warrants

Series A

161

Total Warrants Clean Tech (0.59%)*

4,397

2,847

Total Warrants (6.59%)

29,500

31,978

See notes to ~~Consolidated Financial Statements~~consolidated financial statements (unaudited)

HERCULES TECHNOLOGY GROWTH CAPITAL, INC.

CONSOLIDATED SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS—(Continued)

~~September 30, 2011~~March 31, 2012

(unaudited)

(dollars in thousands)

Portfolio Company

Industry

Type of Investment⁽¹⁾
   Principal
Amount    Cost⁽²⁾    Value⁽³⁾
BrightSource Energy, Inc.⁽⁴⁾
   Clean Tech
Senior Debt
Matures December 2011
Interest rate Prime + 7.75% or
Floor rate of 11.0%
   $ 11,250       $ 11,096       $ 11,096

Senior Debt
Matures December 2012
Interest rate Prime + 9.55% or
Floor rate of 12.8%
   $ 13,750       13,542       13,542

Preferred Stock Warrants
      675       623




Total BrightSource Energy, Inc.
            25,313       25,261
Calera, Inc.
   Clean Tech    Preferred Stock Warrants       513       660




Total Calera, Inc.
            513       660
EcoMotors, Inc.
   Clean Tech
Senior Debt
Matures February 2014
Interest rate Prime + 6.1% or
Floor rate of 9.35%
   $ 5,383       5,260       5,421

Preferred Stock Warrants
      154       451

Common Stock Warrants
      154       451




Total EcoMotors, Inc.
            5,568       6,323
Enphase Energy, Inc.
   Clean Tech
Senior Debt
Matures June 2014
Interest rate Prime + 5.75% or
Floor rate of 9.0%
   $ 4,248       4,135       4,135

Preferred Stock Warrants
      102       17




Total Enphase Energy, Inc.
            4,237       4,152
GreatPoint Energy, Inc.
   Clean Tech    Preferred Stock Warrants       548       203




Total GreatPoint Energy, Inc.
            548       203
NanoSolar, Inc.
   Clean Tech
Senior Debt
Matures September 2014
Interest rate Prime + 7.75% or
Floor rate of 11.0%
   $ 10,000       9,515       9,515

Preferred Stock Warrants

      355       355
Total NanoSolar, Inc.
            9,870       9,870
Propel Biofuels, Inc.
   Clean Tech
Senior Debt
Matures September 2013
Interest rate 11.0%
   $ 1,540       1,562       1,570


Preferred Stock Warrants
      211       195




Total Propel Biofuels, Inc.
            1,773       1,765
Scientific Conservation, Inc.
   Clean Tech
Senior Debt
Matures October 2014
Interest rate 6.25%
   $ 202       196       196
      Preferred Stock Warrants       8       2




Total Scientific Conservation, Inc.
            204       198


Portfolio Company	Industry	Type of Investment⁽¹⁾		Principal Amount	Cost⁽²⁾		Value⁽³⁾
Aegerion Pharmaceuticals, Inc.⁽³⁾	Drug Discovery & Development	Common Stock			$	150	$	1,059
Aveo Pharmaceuticals, Inc.⁽³⁾	Drug Discovery & Development	Common Stock				842		2,083
Dicerna Pharmaceuticals, Inc.	Drug Discovery & Development	Preferred Stock	Series B			503		374
Inotek Pharmaceuticals Corp.	Drug Discovery & Development	Preferred Stock	Series C			1,500		—
Merrimack Pharmaceuticals, Inc.⁽³⁾	Drug Discovery & Development	Common Stock				2,000		3,383
Paratek Pharmaceuticals, Inc.	Drug Discovery & Development	Preferred Stock	Series H			1,000		577

Total Equity Drug Discovery & Development (1.54%)*						5,995		7,476

Acceleron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.	Drug Delivery	Preferred Stock	Series C			243		163
		Preferred Stock	Series E			98		138
		Preferred Stock	Series F			61		61
		Preferred Stock	Series B			1,000		724

Total Acceleron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.						1,402		1,086

Transcept Pharmaceuticals, Inc.⁽³⁾	Drug Delivery	Common Stock				500		437

Total Equity Drug Delivery (0.31%)*						1,902		1,523

E-band Communications, Corp.⁽⁶⁾	Communications & Networking	Preferred Stock	Series B			2,000		153
		Preferred Stock	Series C			372		175
		Preferred Stock	Series D			508		229
		Preferred Stock	Series E			374		537

Total E-band Communications, Corp.						3,254		1,094

Neonova Holding Company	Communications & Networking	Preferred Stock	Series A			250		255
Peerless Network, Inc.	Communications & Networking	Preferred Stock	Series A			1,000		2,851
Stoke, Inc.	Communications & Networking	Preferred Stock	Series E			500		480

Total Equity Communications & Networking (0.96%)*						5,004		4,680

Atrenta, Inc.	Software	Preferred Stock	Series D			250		379
Box.net, Inc.⁽⁴⁾	Software	Preferred Stock	Series C			500		3,777
		Preferred Stock	Series D			500		1,529
		Preferred Stock	Series D-1			1,000		1,204
		Preferred Stock	Series D-2			2,001		2,135

Total Box.net, Inc.						4,001		8,645

Total Equity Software (1.86%)*						4,251		9,024

Maxvision Holding, LLC.⁽⁷⁾⁽⁸⁾	Electronics & Computer Hardware	Preferred Stock	Series A			3,500		—
		Preferred Stock	LLC interest			81		—

Total Maxvision Holding, LLC.						3,581		—

Spatial Photonics, Inc.	Electronics & Computer Hardware	Preferred Stock	Series D			268		—

Total Equity Electronics & Computer Hardware (0.00%)*						3,849		—

Quatrx Pharmaceuticals Company	Specialty Pharmaceuticals	Preferred Stock	Series E			750		—

Total Equity Specialty Pharmaceuticals (0.00%)*						750		—

See notes to ~~Consolidated Financial Statements~~consolidated financial statements (unaudited)

HERCULES TECHNOLOGY GROWTH CAPITAL, INC.

CONSOLIDATED SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS—(Continued)

~~September 30, 2011~~March 31, 2012

(unaudited)

(dollars in thousands)

Portfolio Company

Industry

Type of Investment⁽¹⁾
   Principal
Amount    Cost⁽²⁾    Value⁽³⁾
Solexel, Inc.
   Clean Tech
Senior Debt
Matures June 2013
Interest rate Prime + 8.25% or
Floor rate of 11.50%
   $ 1,031       $ 966       $ 966

Senior Debt
Matures June 2013
Interest rate Prime + 7.25% or
Floor rate of 10.50%
   $ 8,927       9,660       9,660
      Preferred Stock Warrants       335       11
      Preferred Stock Warrants       259       71
      Preferred Stock Warrants       142       142
      Preferred Stock Warrants       426       427




Total Solexel, Inc.
            11,788       11,277
Trilliant, Inc.
   Clean Tech    Preferred Stock Warrants       89       46
      Preferred Stock Warrants       73       38




Total Trilliant, Inc.
            162       84




Total Clean Tech (14.17%)*
            59,976       59,793




Total Investments
            $ 587,405       $ 576,477


Portfolio Company	Industry	Type of Investment⁽¹⁾		Principal Amount	Cost⁽²⁾		Value⁽³⁾
Caivis Acquisition Corporation	Consumer & Business Products	Common Stock	Series A		$	880	$	—
Facebook, Inc.	Consumer & Business Products	Common Stock	Series B			9,557		13,453
IPA Holdings, LLC	Consumer & Business Products	Preferred Stock	LLC interest			500		484
Market Force Information, Inc.	Consumer & Business Products	Preferred Stock	Series B			500		500
Wageworks, Inc.	Consumer & Business Products	Preferred Stock	Series D			250		319

Total Equity Consumer & Business Products (3.04%)*						11,687		14,756

iWatt, Inc.	Semiconductors	Preferred Stock	Series E			490		1,361
NEXX Systems, Inc.	Semiconductors	Preferred Stock	Series D			277		1,955

Total Equity Semiconductors (0.68%)*						767		3,316

Gelesis, Inc.	Therapeutic	Common Stock				—		108
		Preferred Stock	Series A-1			425		519
		Preferred Stock	Series A-2			500		520

Total Gelesis, Inc.						925		1,147

Novasys Medical, Inc.	Therapeutic	Preferred Stock	Series D-1			1,000		799

Total Equity Therapeutic (0.40%)*						1,925		1,946

Cozi Group, Inc.	Internet Consumer & Business Services	Preferred Stock	Series B			177		26
RazorGator Interactive Group, Inc.	Internet Consumer & Business Services	Preferred Stock	Series A			1,000		—

Total Equity Internet Consumer & Business Services (0.01%)						1,177		26

Buzznet, Inc.	Information Services	Preferred Stock	Series C			250		—
Good Technologies, Inc. (pka Visto Corporation)	Information Services	Common Stock				603		90
Magi.com (pka Hi5 Networks, Inc.)	Information Services	Preferred Stock	Series C			250		247
Solutionary, Inc.	Information Services	Preferred Stock	Series A-1			326		86
		Preferred Stock	Series A-2			17		248

Total Solutionary, Inc.						343		334
Zeta Interactive Corporation	Information Services	Preferred Stock	Series A			500		543

Total Equity Information Services (0.25%)						1,946		1,214

Optiscan Biomedical, Corp.	Medical Device & Equipment	Preferred Stock	Series B			3,000		1,576
		Preferred Stock	Series C			655		638

Total Optiscan Biomedical, Corp.						3,655		2,214

Total Equity Medical Device & Equipment (0.46%)*						3,655		2,214

NuGEN Technologies, Inc.	Biotechnology Tools	Preferred Stock	Series C			500		484

Total Equity Biotechnology Tools (0.10%)*						500		484

Transmedics, Inc.⁽⁴⁾	Surgical Devices	Preferred Stock	Series C			300		—
		Preferred Stock	Series B			1,100		—

Total Transmedics, Inc.						1,400		—
Gynesonics, Inc.	Surgical Devices	Preferred Stock	Series B			250		180
		Preferred Stock	Series C			282		305

Total Gynesonics, Inc.						532		485

Total Equity Surgical Devices (0.10%)*						1,932		485

See notes to consolidated financial statements (unaudited)

HERCULES TECHNOLOGY GROWTH CAPITAL, INC.

CONSOLIDATED SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS—(Continued)

March 31, 2012

(unaudited)

(dollars in thousands)


Portfolio Company	Industry	Type of Investment⁽¹⁾		Principal Amount	Cost⁽²⁾		Value⁽³⁾
Everyday Health, Inc. (pka Waterfront Media, Inc.)	Media/ Content/ Info	Preferred Stock	Series D		$	1,000	$	718

Total Equity Media/Content/Info (0.15%)*						1,000		718

Total Equity (9.86%)						46,340		47,862

Total Investments (143.06%)					$	695,385	$	694,464

*	Value as a percent of net assets

(1)	Preferred and common stock, warrants, and equity interests are generally non-income producing.

(2)	Gross unrealized appreciation, gross unrealized depreciation, and net depreciation for federal income tax purposes totaled ~~$28,443, $40,649~~$24,315, $26,801 and ~~$12,205~~$2,486 respectively. The tax cost of investments is ~~$588,807.~~$696,383.

(3)

Except for warrants in ~~twelve~~16 publicly traded companies and common stock in ~~five~~four publicly traded companies, all investments are restricted at ~~September 30, 2011. No unrestricted securities of the same issuer are outstanding. The Company uses the Standard Industrial Code for classifying the industry grouping of its portfolio companies.~~

~~(4)~~

~~Debt investments of this portfolio company have been pledged as collateral under the Wells Facility.~~

~~(5)~~

~~Non-U.S. company or the company’s principal place of business is outside the United States.~~

~~(6)~~

~~Affiliate investment that is defined under the Investment Company Act of 1940 as companies in which HTGC owns at least 5% but not more than 25% of the voting securities of the company.~~

~~(7)~~

Control investment that is defined under the Investment Company Act of 1940 as companies in which HTGC owns at least 25% of the voting securities of the company, or has greater than 50% representation on its board.

~~(8)~~

~~Debt is on non-accrual status at September 30, 2011, and is therefore considered non-income producing.~~

~~See notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)~~

~~HERCULES TECHNOLOGY GROWTH CAPITAL, INC.~~

~~CONSOLIDATED SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS~~

~~December 31, 2010~~

~~(dollars in thousands)~~

Portfolio Company
   Industry
Type of Investment⁽¹⁾
   Principal
Amount    Cost⁽²⁾    Value⁽³⁾
Acceleron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
   Drug Discovery    Preferred Stock Warrants       $ 69       $ 922
      Preferred Stock Warrants       35       189
      Preferred Stock Warrants       39       99
      Preferred Stock       1,341       2,316




Total Acceleron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
            1,484       3,526
Aveo Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
   Drug Discovery
Senior Debt
Matures September 2013
Interest rate Prime + 7.15% or
Floor rate of 11.9%
   $ 25,000       26,108       26,108
      Preferred Stock Warrants       190       686
      Preferred Stock Warrants       104       165
      Preferred Stock Warrants       24       58
      Preferred Stock Warrants       288       770
      Preferred Stock Warrants       236       630




Total Aveo Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
            26,950       28,417
Dicerna Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
   Drug Discovery
Senior Debt
Matures July 2012
Interest rate Prime + 9.20% or
Floor rate of 12.95%
   $ 4,699       4,678       4,706
      Preferred Stock Warrants       205       182
      Preferred Stock Warrants       30       33
      Preferred Stock Warrants       28       25
      Preferred Stock       503       503




Total Dicerna Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
            5,444       5,449
EpiCept Corporation
   Drug Discovery    Common Stock Warrants       4       112
      Common Stock Warrants       40       10




Total EpiCept Corporation
            44       122
Horizon Therapeutics, Inc.
   Drug Discovery    Preferred Stock Warrants       231       —




Total Horizon Therapeutics, Inc.
            231       —
Inotek Pharmaceuticals Corp.
   Drug Discovery    Preferred Stock       1,500       —




Total Inotek Pharmaceuticals Corp.
            1,500       —
Merrimack Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
   Drug Discovery    Preferred Stock Warrants       155       170
      Preferred Stock       2,000       1,547




Total Merrimack Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
            2,155       1,717
Paratek Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
   Drug Discovery    Preferred Stock Warrants       137       155
      Preferred Stock       1,000       999




Total Paratek Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
            1,137       1,154
PolyMedix, Inc.
   Drug Discovery
Senior Debt
Matures September 2013
Interest rate Prime + 7.1% or
Floor rate of 12.35%
   $ 10,000       9,605       9,605
      Preferred Stock Warrants       480       248




Total PolyMedix, Inc.
            10,085       9,853

~~See notes to consolidated financial statements.~~

~~HERCULES TECHNOLOGY GROWTH CAPITAL, INC.~~

~~CONSOLIDATED SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS—(Continued)~~

~~December 31, 2010~~

~~(dollars in thousands)~~

Portfolio Company

Industry

Type of Investment⁽¹⁾
   Principal
Amount    Cost⁽²⁾    Value⁽³⁾
Portola Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
   Drug Discovery
Senior Debt
Matures April 2011
Interest rate Prime + 2.16%
   $ 1,666       $ 2,033       $ 2,033

Preferred Stock Warrants
      152       506




Total Portola Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
            2,185       2,539




Total Drug Discovery (12.79%)*

   51,215       52,777




Affinity Videonet, Inc.

Communications
& Networking
   Preferred Stock Warrants       102       180




Total Affinity Videonet, Inc.

   102       180
E-band Communications, Corp.⁽⁶⁾
   Communications & Networking    Preferred Stock       2,880       3,069




Total E-Band Communications, Corp.

   2,880       3,069
IKANO Communications, Inc.
   Communications & Networking
Senior Debt
Matures August 2011
Interest rate 12.00%
   $ 1,654       1,953       1,953

Preferred Stock Warrants
      45

Preferred Stock Warrants
      72



Total IKANO Communications, Inc.

   2,070       1,953
Intelepeer, Inc.
   Communications & Networking
Senior Debt
Matures May 2013
Interest rate Prime + 8.125%
   $ 7,624       7,468       7,459

Preferred Stock Warrants
      102       111




Total Intelepeer, Inc.

   7,570       7,570
Neonova Holding Company
   Communications & Networking    Preferred Stock Warrants       94       12

Preferred Stock
      250       140




Total Neonova Holding Company

   344       152
Opsource, Inc.⁽⁴⁾
   Communications & Networking
Senior Debt
Matures June 2013
Interest rate Prime + 7.75% or
Floor rate of 11.00%
   $ 5,000       4,888       4,888

Senior Debt
Matures October 2013
Interest rate Prime + 7.25%
or Floor rate of 10.50%
   $ 2,000       1,944       1,905

Revolving Line of Credit
Matures June 2011
Interest rate Prime + 5.25% or
Floor rate of 8.50%
   $ 1,500       1,458       1,458

Preferred Stock Warrants
      223       105




Total Opsource, Inc.

   8,513       8,356

~~See notes to consolidated financial statements.~~

~~HERCULES TECHNOLOGY GROWTH CAPITAL, INC.~~

~~CONSOLIDATED SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS—(Continued)~~

~~December 31, 2010~~

~~(dollars in thousands)~~

Portfolio Company

Industry

Type of Investment⁽¹⁾
   Principal
Amount    Cost⁽²⁾    Value⁽³⁾
Pac-West Telecomm, Inc.

Communications
& Networking

Senior Debt
Matures April 2014
Interest rate Prime + 7.5% or
Floor rate of 12.0%
   $ 10,000       $ 9,634       $ 9,634

Preferred Stock Warrants
      121       147




Total Pac-West Telecomm, Inc.
            9,755       9,781
PeerApp, Inc.

Communications
& Networking

Senior Debt
Matures April 2013
Interest rate Prime + 7.5% or
Floor rate of 11.50%
   $ 2,911       2,855       2,792

Preferred Stock Warrants
      61       65




Total PeerApp, Inc.
            2,916       2,857
Peerless Network, Inc.

Communications
& Networking

Preferred Stock Warrants
      95       138

Preferred Stock
      1,000       1,930




Total Peerless Network, Inc.
            1,095       2,068
Ping Identity Corporation

Communications
& Networking

Preferred Stock Warrants
      52       6




Total Ping Identity Corporation
            52       6
Purcell Systems, Inc.

Communications
& Networking

Preferred Stock Warrants
      123       330




Total Purcell Systems, Inc.
            123       330
Seven Networks, Inc.

Communications
& Networking

Preferred Stock Warrants
      174       40




Total Seven Networks, Inc.
            174       40
Stoke, Inc.⁽⁴⁾

Communications
& Networking

Senior Debt
Matures May 2013
Interest rate Prime + 7.0% or
Floor rate of 10.25%
   $ 4,000       3,883       3,883

Preferred Stock Warrants
      53       210

Preferred Stock Warrants
      65       133

Preferred Stock
      500       500




Total Stoke, Inc.
            4,501       4,726
Tectura Corporation

Communications
& Networking

Senior Debt
Matures December 2012
Interest rate 11%
   $ 5,625       5,512       5,512

Revolving Line of Credit
Matures July 2011
Interest rate 11%
   $ 17,477       18,488       18,488

Preferred Stock Warrants
      50       10




Total Tectura Corporation
            24,050       24,010




Total Communications & Networking (15.78%)*
            64,145       65,098

~~See notes to consolidated financial statements.~~

~~HERCULES TECHNOLOGY GROWTH CAPITAL, INC.~~

~~CONSOLIDATED SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS—(Continued)~~

~~December 31, 2010~~

~~(dollars in thousands)~~

Portfolio Company

Industry

Type of Investment⁽¹⁾
   Principal
Amount    Cost⁽²⁾    Value⁽³⁾
Atrenta, Inc.
   Software    Preferred Stock Warrants       $ 102       $ 46
      Preferred Stock Warrants       34       15
      Preferred Stock Warrants       95       22
      Preferred Stock       250       143




Total Atrenta, Inc.

   481       226
Blurb, Inc.
   Software
Senior Debt
Matures June 2011
Interest rate Prime + 3.50% or
Floor rate of 8.5%
   $ 1,162       1,392       1,392

Preferred Stock Warrants
      25       349

Preferred Stock Warrants
      299       228




Total Blurb, Inc.

   1,716       1,969
Braxton Technologies, LLC.
   Software    Preferred Stock Warrants       188



Total Braxton Technologies, LLC.

   188
Bullhorn, Inc.
   Software    Preferred Stock Warrants       43       234




Total Bullhorn, Inc.

   43       234
Clickfox, Inc.
   Software
Senior Debt
Matures July 2013
Interest rate Prime + 6.00% or
Floor rate of 11.25%
   $ 6,000       5,801       5,801

Revolving Line of Credit
Matures July 2011
Interest rate Prime + 5.00% or
Floor rate of 12.00%
   $ 2,000       1,997       1,996

Preferred Stock Warrants
      177       643

Preferred Stock Warrants
      152       643




Total Clickfox, Inc.

   8,127       9,083
Forescout Technologies, Inc.
   Software    Preferred Stock Warrants       99       14




Total Forescout Technologies, Inc.

   99       14
GameLogic, Inc.
   Software    Preferred Stock Warrants       92



Total GameLogic, Inc.

   92
HighJump Acquisition, LLC.
   Software
Senior Debt
Matures May 2013
Interest rate Libor + 9.25% or
Floor rate of 12.50%
   $ 17,500       17,386       17,386




Total HighJump Acquisition, LLC.

   17,386       17,386
HighRoads, Inc.
   Software    Preferred Stock Warrants       44       65




Total HighRoads, Inc.

   44       65

~~See notes to consolidated financial statements.~~

~~HERCULES TECHNOLOGY GROWTH CAPITAL, INC.~~

~~CONSOLIDATED SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS—(Continued)~~

~~December 31, 2010~~

~~(dollars in thousands)~~

Portfolio Company

Industry

Type of Investment⁽¹⁾
   Principal
Amount    Cost⁽²⁾    Value⁽³⁾
Infologix, Inc.⁽⁷⁾    Software
Senior Debt
Matures November 2013
Interest rate 18.00%
   $ 5,500       $ 5,162       $ 5,162

Convertible Senior
Debt Matures November 2014
Interest rate 12.00%
      1,111       1,127

Revolving Line of Credit
Matures May 2011
Interest rate 12.00%
   $ 12,317       12,317       12,317

Senior Debt
Matures December 2010
Interest rate 18.00%
   $ 2,178       2,178       2,178

Senior Debt
Matures April 2013
Interest rate 8.00%
   $ 1,350       1,350       1,350

Senior Debt
Matures September 2011
Interest rate 10.00%
   $ 500       509       509

Preferred Stock Warrants
      725       1,394

Common Stock
      5,000       9,620

Common Stock
      36       69

Common Stock
      3,355       6,455




Total Infologix, Inc.             31,743       40,181
PSS Systems, Inc.    Software
Preferred Stock Warrants
      51       17




Total PSS Systems, Inc.             51       17
Rockyou, Inc.    Software
Preferred Stock Warrants
      117       186




Total Rockyou, Inc.             117       186
Sportvision, Inc.    Software
Preferred Stock Warrants
      39



Total Sportvision, Inc.             39
Unify Corporation    Software
Senior Debt
Matures June 2015
Interest rate Libor + 8.50% or
Floor rate of 10.50%
   $ 24,000       22,248       22,968

Revolving Line of Credit
Matures June 2015
Interest rate Libor + 7.50% or
Floor rate of 9.50%
   $ 3,750       3,731       3,476

Preferred Stock Warrants
      1,434       693




Total Unify Corporation             27,413       27,137
WildTangent, Inc.    Software
Preferred Stock Warrants
      238       10




Total WildTangent, Inc.             238       10




Total Software (23.39%)*             87,777       96,508




Luminus Devices, Inc.
Electronics &
Computer Hardware

Senior Debt
Matures December 2011
Interest rate 11.875%
   $ 540       540       540

Preferred Stock Warrants
      183

Preferred Stock Warrants
      84

Preferred Stock Warrants
      334



Total Luminus Devices, Inc.             1,141       540

~~See notes to consolidated financial statements.~~

~~HERCULES TECHNOLOGY GROWTH CAPITAL, INC.~~

~~CONSOLIDATED SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS—(Continued)~~

~~December 31, 2010~~

~~(dollars in thousands)~~

Portfolio Company

Industry

Type of Investment⁽¹⁾
   Principal
Amount    Cost⁽²⁾    Value⁽³⁾
Maxvision Holding, LLC.

Electronics &
Computer Hardware

Senior Debt
Matures October 2012
Interest rate Prime + 7.25% or
Floor rate of 10.75%
   $ 5,000       $ 5,377       $ 377

Senior Debt
Matures April 2012
Interest rate Prime + 5.0% or
Floor rate of 8.5%
   $ 3,409       3,382       3,382

Revolving Line of Credit
Matures April 2012
Interest rate Prime + 5.0% or
Floor rate of 8.5%
   $ 3,100       3,163       3,163

Common Stock
      81



Total Maxvision Holding, LLC.

   12,003       6,922
Shocking Technologies, Inc.

Electronics &
Computer Hardware

Preferred Stock Warrants
      63       90




Total Shocking Technologies, Inc.

   63       90
Spatial Photonics, Inc.

Electronics &
Computer Hardware

Preferred Stock Warrants
      129       —

Preferred Stock
      767       267




Total Spatial Photonics, Inc.

   896       267
VeriWave, Inc.

Electronics &
Computer Hardware

Preferred Stock Warrants
      54

Preferred Stock Warrants
      46



Total VeriWave, Inc.

   100



Total Electronics & Computer Hardware (1.90%)*

   14,203       7,819




Aegerion Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Specialty
Pharmaceuticals

Preferred Stock Warrants
      69       761

Preferred Stock
      1,475       2,206




Total Aegerion Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

   1,544       2,967
Althea Technologies, Inc.

Specialty
Pharmaceuticals

Senior Debt
Matures October 2013
Interest rate Prime + 7.70% or
Floor rate of 10.95%
   $ 12,000       11,661       11,661

Preferred Stock Warrants
      309       276




Total Althea Technologies, Inc.

   11,970       11,937
Chroma Therapeutics, Ltd.⁽⁵⁾

Specialty
Pharmaceuticals

Senior Debt
Matures September 2013
Interest rate Prime + 7.75% or
Floor rate of 12.00%
   $ 10,000       9,797       10,021

Preferred Stock Warrants
      490       632




Total Chroma Therapeutics, Ltd.

   10,287       10,653

~~See notes to consolidated financial statements.~~

~~HERCULES TECHNOLOGY GROWTH CAPITAL, INC.~~

~~CONSOLIDATED SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS—(Continued)~~

~~December 31, 2010~~

~~(dollars in thousands)~~

Portfolio Company

Industry

Type of Investment⁽¹⁾
   Principal
Amount    Cost⁽²⁾    Value⁽³⁾
Pacira Pharmaceuticals, Inc.⁽⁴⁾

Specialty
Pharmaceuticals

Senior Debt
Matures May 2014
Interest rate Prime + 6.25% or
Floor rate of 10.25%
   $ 11,250       $ 11,105       $ 11,105

Senior Debt
Matures May 2014
Interest rate Prime + 8.65% or
Floor rate of 12.65%
   $ 15,000       13,749       13,749

Preferred Stock Warrants
      1,086       1,255




Total Pacira Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

   25,940       26,109
QuatRx Pharmaceuticals Company

Specialty
Pharmaceuticals

Senior Debt
Matures October 2011
Interest rate Prime + 8.90% or
Floor rate of 12.15%
   $ 9,306       9,474       9,474

Convertible Senior Debt
Interest Rate of 8.0%
Matures March 2012
   $ 1,888       1,888       2,467

Preferred Stock Warrants
      220

Preferred Stock Warrants
      307

Preferred Stock
      751



Total QuatRx Pharmaceuticals Company

   12,640       11,941




Total Specialty Pharmaceuticals (15.42%)*

   62,381       63,607




Annie’s, Inc.

Consumer &
Business Products
   Preferred Stock Warrants       321       75




Total Annie’s, Inc.

   321       75
IPA Holdings, LLC.⁽⁴⁾

Consumer &
Business Products

Senior Debt
Matures November 2012
Interest rate Prime + 6.75% or
Floor rate of 11.0%
   $ 8,250       8,505       8,160

Senior Debt
Matures May 2013
Interest rate Prime + 9.75% or
Floor rate of 14.0%
   $ 6,500       7,019       6,995

Revolving Line of Credit
Matures November 2012
Interest rate Prime + 6.25% or
Floor rate of 10.50%
   $ 856       761       761

Preferred Stock Warrants
      275

Common Stock
      500



Total IPA Holdings, LLC.

   17,060       15,916
Market Force Information, Inc.

Consumer &
Business Products
   Preferred Stock Warrants       24       60

Preferred Stock
      500       439




Total Market Force Information, Inc.

   524       499
Trading Machines, Inc.⁽⁸⁾

Consumer &
Business Products

Senior Debt
Matures January 2014
Interest rate Prime + 10.25% or
Floor rate of 13.50%
   $ 9,812       8,644       4,000

Preferred Stock Warrants
      878

Preferred Stock
      50



Total Trading Machines, Inc.

   9,572       4,000

~~See notes to consolidated financial statements.~~

~~HERCULES TECHNOLOGY GROWTH CAPITAL, INC.~~

~~CONSOLIDATED SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS—(Continued)~~

~~December 31, 2010~~

~~(dollars in thousands)~~

Portfolio Company

Industry

Type of Investment⁽¹⁾
   Principal
Amount    Cost⁽²⁾    Value⁽³⁾
Velocity Technology Solutions, Inc.

Consumer &
Business Products

Senior Debt
Matures February 2015
Interest rate LIBOR + 8% or
Floor rate of 11.00%
   $ 15,417       $ 15,072       $ 14,574

Senior Debt
Matures February 2015
Interest rate LIBOR + 10% or
Floor rate of 13.00%
   $ 8,333       8,317       �� 8,526




Total Velocity Technology Solutions, Inc.
            23,389       23,100
Wageworks, Inc.

Consumer &
Business Products

Preferred Stock Warrants
      253       1,443

Preferred Stock
      250       283
Total Wageworks, Inc.
            503       1,726




Total Consumer & Business Products (10.98%)*
            51,369       45,316




Enpirion, Inc.

Semiconductors

Preferred Stock Warrants
      157       1




Total Enpirion, Inc.
            157       1
iWatt, Inc.

Semiconductors

Preferred Stock Warrants
      46       1

Preferred Stock Warrants
      51       33

Preferred Stock Warrants
      73       44

Preferred Stock Warrants
      458       391

Preferred Stock
      490       940




Total iWatt, Inc.
            1,118       1,409
NEXX Systems, Inc.

Semiconductors

Preferred Stock Warrants
      297       1,113

Preferred Stock
      277       704




Total NEXX Systems, Inc.
            574       1,817
Quartics, Inc.

Semiconductors

Preferred Stock Warrants
      53
Total Quartics, Inc.
            53
Solarflare Communications, Inc.

Semiconductors

Preferred Stock Warrants
      83

Common Stock
      642



Total Solarflare Communications, Inc.
            725
Total Semiconductors (0.78%)*
            2,627       3,227




Alexza Pharmaceuticals, Inc.⁽⁴⁾

Drug Delivery

Senior Debt
Matures October 2013
Interest rate Prime + 6.5% or
Floor rate of 10.75%
   $ 15,000       14,526       14,472

Preferred Stock Warrants
      645       193




Total Alexza Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
            15,171       14,665
Labopharm USA, Inc.⁽⁵⁾

Drug Delivery

Senior Debt
Matures December 2012
Interest rate 10.95%
   $ 20,000       19,872       19,872

Common Stock Warrants
      635       329




Total Labopharm USA, Inc.
            20,507       20,201

~~See notes to consolidated financial statements.~~

~~HERCULES TECHNOLOGY GROWTH CAPITAL, INC.~~

~~CONSOLIDATED SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS—(Continued)~~

~~December 31, 2010~~

~~(dollars in thousands)~~

Portfolio Company

Industry

Type of Investment⁽¹⁾
   Principal
Amount    Cost⁽²⁾    Value⁽³⁾
Transcept Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Drug Delivery

Common Stock Warrants
      $ 36       $ 60

Common Stock Warrants
      51       16

Common Stock
      500       308




Total Transcept Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

   587       384




Total Drug Delivery (8.54%)*

   36,265       35,250




BARRX Medical, Inc.

Therapeutic

Senior Debt
Mature December 2011
Interest rate 11.00%
   $ 2,901       3,350       3,350

Preferred Stock Warrants
      76       70

Preferred Stock
      1,500       1,890




Total BARRX Medical, Inc.

   4,926       5,310
EKOS Corporation

Therapeutic

Preferred Stock Warrants
      174

Preferred Stock Warrants
      153



Total EKOS Corporation

   327
Gelesis, Inc.⁽⁸⁾

Therapeutic

Senior Debt
Matures May 2012
Interest rate Prime + 7.5% or
Floor rate of 10.75%
   $ 2,771       2,800       45




Total Gelesis, Inc.

   2,800       45
Gynesonics, Inc.

Therapeutic

Senior Debt
Mature October 2013
Interest rate Prime + 8.25% or
Floor rate of 11.50%
   $ 6,500       6,277       6,277

Preferred Stock Warrants
      228       221

Preferred Stock
      532       456




Total Gynesonics, Inc.

   7,037       6,954
Light Science Oncology, Inc.

Therapeutic

Preferred Stock Warrants
      99       26




Total Light Science Oncology, Inc.

   99       26
Novasys Medical, Inc.

Therapeutic

Preferred Stock Warrants
      71       1

Preferred Stock Warrants
      54       7

Preferred Stock
      1,000       1,159




Total Novasys Medical, Inc.

   1,125       1,167
Pacific Child & Family Associates, LLC.

Therapeutic

Senior Debt
Matures January 2015
Interest rate LIBOR + 8.0% or
Floor rate of 10.50%
   $ 6,539       6,392       5,802

Senior Debt
Matures January 2015
Interest rate LIBOR + 10.50% or
Floor rate of 13.0%
   $ 5,900       5,996       5,996




Total Pacific Child & Family Associates, LLC.

   12,388       11,798




Total Therapeutic (6.13%)*

   28,702       25,300

~~See notes to consolidated financial statements.~~

~~HERCULES TECHNOLOGY GROWTH CAPITAL, INC.~~

~~CONSOLIDATED SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS—(Continued)~~

~~December 31, 2010~~

~~(dollars in thousands)~~

Portfolio Company
   Industry
Type of Investment⁽¹⁾
   Principal
Amount    Cost⁽²⁾    Value⁽³⁾
Cozi Group, Inc.
   Internet Consumer &
Business Services

Preferred Stock Warrants
      $ 147       $ —

Preferred Stock
      177       292




Total Cozi Group, Inc.

   324       292
Invoke Solutions, Inc.
   Internet Consumer &
Business Services
Preferred Stock Warrants
      56       74

Preferred Stock Warrants
      26       18




Total Invoke Solutions, Inc.

   82       92
Prism Education Group, Inc.
   Internet Consumer &
Business Services
Preferred Stock Warrants
      43       50




Total Prism Education Group, Inc.

   43       50
RazorGator Interactive Group, Inc.⁽⁴⁾
   Internet Consumer &
Business Services
Revolving Line of Credit
Matures October 2011
Interest rate Prime + 9.50% or
Floor rate of 14.00%
   $ 2,108       1,855       1,855

Preferred Stock Warrants
      13

Preferred Stock Warrants
      28

Preferred Stock Warrants
      1,183

Preferred Stock
      1,000



Total RazorGator Interactive Group, Inc.
            4,079       1,855
Reply! Inc.⁽⁴⁾
   Internet Consumer &
Business Services
Senior Debt
Matures June 2013
Interest rate Prime + 6.5% or
Floor rate of 9.75%
   $ 5,000       4,646       4,646

Preferred Stock Warrants
      320       320




Total Reply! Inc.

   4,966       4,966




Total Internet Consumer & Business Services (1.76%)*

   9,494       7,255




Lilliputian Systems, Inc.
   Energy
Preferred Stock Warrants
      106       3

Common Stock Warrants
      49       —



Total Lilliputian Systems, Inc.

   155       3




Total Energy (0.00%)*

   155       3




Box.net, Inc.
   Information Services
Senior Debt
Matures May 2011
Interest rate Prime + 1.50% or
Floor rate of 7.50%
   $ 213       270       270

Senior Debt
Matures September 2011
Interest rate Prime + 0.50% or
Floor rate of 6.50%
   $ 127       139       139

Preferred Stock Warrants
      73       184

Preferred Stock Warrants
      117       117

Preferred Stock
      500       500




Total Box.net, Inc.

   1,099       1,210

~~See notes to consolidated financial statements.~~

~~HERCULES TECHNOLOGY GROWTH CAPITAL, INC.~~

~~CONSOLIDATED SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS—(Continued)~~

~~December 31, 2010~~

~~(dollars in thousands)~~

Portfolio Company

Industry

Type of Investment⁽¹⁾
   Principal
Amount    Cost⁽²⁾    Value⁽³⁾
Buzznet, Inc.
   Information Services
Preferred Stock Warrants
      $ 9       $ —

Preferred Stock
      250       37




Total Buzznet, Inc.

   259       37
XL Education Corp.
   Information Services
Common Stock
      880       880




Total XL Education Corp.

   880       880
hi5 Networks, Inc.
   Information Services
Preferred Stock Warrants
      213

Preferred Stock
      250       247




Total hi5 Networks, Inc.

   463       247
Jab Wireless, Inc.
   Information Services
Preferred Stock Warrants
      265       122




Total Jab Wireless, Inc.

   265       122
Solutionary, Inc.
   Information Services
Preferred Stock Warrants
      94

Preferred Stock Warrants
      2

Preferred Stock
      250       50




Total Solutionary, Inc.

   346       50
Intelligent Beauty, Inc.
   Information Services
Senior Debt
Matures March 2013
Interest rate Prime + 8.0% or
Floor rate of 11.25%
   $ 5,812       5,563       5,557

Senior Debt
Matures October 2013
Interest rate Prime + 8.0% or
Floor rate of 11.25%
   $ 2,000       1,942       1,942

Preferred Stock Warrants
      230       230




Total Intelligent Beauty, Inc.

   7,735       7,729
Good Technologies, Inc.
   Information Services
Common Stock
      603       150




Total Good Technologies, Inc.

   603       150
Coveroo, Inc.
   Information Services
Preferred Stock Warrants
      7       —



Total Coveroo, Inc.

   7
Zeta Interactive Corporation
   Information Services
Preferred Stock Warrants
      172       57

Preferred Stock
      500       375




Total Zeta Interactive Corporation

   672       432




Total Information Services (2.63%)*

   12,329       10,857




Novadaq Technologies, Inc.⁽⁵⁾
   Diagnostic
Common Stock
      1,415       675




Total Novadaq Technologies, Inc.

   1,415       675

~~See notes to consolidated financial statements.~~

~~HERCULES TECHNOLOGY GROWTH CAPITAL, INC.~~

~~CONSOLIDATED SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS—(Continued)~~

~~December 31, 2010~~

~~(dollars in thousands)~~

Portfolio Company

Industry

Type of Investment⁽¹⁾
   Principal
Amount    Cost⁽²⁾    Value⁽³⁾
Optiscan Biomedical Corp.

Diagnostic

Senior Debt
Matures December 2013
Interest rate Prime + 7.0% or
Floor rate of 10.25%
   $ 10,750       $ 10,392       $ 10,392

Preferred Stock Warrants
      1,069       637

Preferred Stock
      3,656       3,207




Total Optiscan Biomedical Corp.

   15,117       14,236




Total Diagnostic (3.61%)*

   16,532       14,911




Kamada, LTD.⁽⁵⁾

Biotechnology Tools

Preferred Stock Warrants
      159       164

Common Stock
      752       1,754




Total Kamada, LTD.

   911       1,918
Labcyte, Inc.

Biotechnology Tools

Senior Debt
Matures May 2013
Interest rate Prime + 8.6% or
Floor rate of 11.85%
   $ 3,885       3,761       3,821

Common Stock Warrants
      192



Total Labcyte, Inc.

   3,953       3,821
NuGEN Technologies, Inc.

Biotechnology Tools

Preferred Stock Warrants
      45       44

Preferred Stock Warrants
      33       1

Preferred Stock
      500       203




Total NuGEN Technologies, Inc.

   578       248




Total Biotechnology Tools (1.45%)*

   5,442       5,987




Crux Biomedical, Inc.

Surgical Devices

Preferred Stock Warrants
      37

Preferred Stock
      250



Total Crux Biomedical, Inc.

   287
Transmedics, Inc.⁽⁴⁾

Surgical Devices

Senior Debt
Matures February 2014
Interest rate Prime + 9.70% or
Floor rate of 12.95%
   $ 8,375       8,913       8,913

Preferred Stock Warrants
      224       159

Preferred Stock
      1,100       1,100




Total Transmedics, Inc.

   10,237       10,172




Total Surgical Devices (2.47%)*

   10,524       10,172




Glam Media, Inc.

Media/Content/ Info

Preferred Stock Warrants
      482       283




Total Glam Media, Inc.

   482       283
Everyday Health, Inc.

Media/Content/ Info

Preferred Stock Warrants
      60       630

Preferred Stock
      1,000       1,310




Total Everyday Health, Inc.

   1,060       1,940




Total Media/Content/Info (0.54%)*

   1,542       2,223

~~See notes to consolidated financial statements.~~

~~HERCULES TECHNOLOGY GROWTH CAPITAL, INC.~~

~~CONSOLIDATED SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS—(Continued)~~

~~December 31, 2010~~

~~(dollars in thousands)~~

Portfolio Company

Industry

Type of Investment⁽¹⁾
   Principal
Amount    Cost⁽²⁾    Value⁽³⁾
BrightSource Energy, Inc.⁽⁴⁾

Clean Tech

Senior Debt
Matures December 2011
Interest rate Prime + 7.75% or
Floor rate of 11.0%
   $ 3,750       $ 3,265       $ 3,265

Senior Debt
Matures June 2012
Interest rate Prime + 9.55% or
Floor rate of 12.80%
   $ 4,583       4,156       4,156
      Preferred Stock Warrants       675       674




Total BrightSource Energy, Inc.

   8,096       8,095
Calera, Inc.

Clean Tech

Senior Debt
Matures July 2013
Interest rate Prime + 7.0% or
Floor rate of 10.25%
   $ 3,621       3,109       3,109
      Preferred Stock Warrants       513       527




Total Calera, Inc.

   3,622       3,636
GreatPoint Energy, Inc.

Clean Tech

Senior Debt
Matures October 2013
Interest rate Prime + 8.2% or
Floor rate of 11.45%
   $ 5,000       4,322       4,322

Preferred Stock Warrants
      548       627




Total GreatPoint Energy, Inc.

   4,870       4,949
Propel Biofuels, Inc.

Clean Tech

Senior Debt
Matures September 2013
Interest rate 11.0%
   $ 2,118       1,880       1,850

Preferred Stock Warrants
      211       192




Total Propel Biofuels, Inc.

   2,091       2,042
Solexel, Inc.

Clean Tech

Senior Debt
Matures June 2013
Interest rate Prime + 8.25% or
Floor rate of 11.50%
   $ 1,109       1,010       1,010

Senior Debt
Matures June 2013
Interest rate Prime + 7.25% or
Floor rate of 10.50%
   $ 6,000       5,519       5,519

Preferred Stock Warrants
      335       292




Total Solexel, Inc.

   6,864       6,821
Trilliant, Inc.

Clean Tech

Preferred Stock Warrants
      88       99

Preferred Stock Warrants
      72       80




Total Trilliant, Inc.

   160       179




Total Clean Tech (6.24%)*

   25,703       25,722




Total Investments

   $ 480,405       $ 472,032

*	~~Value as a percent of net assets~~

~~(1)~~

~~Preferred and common stock, warrants, and equity interests are generally non-income producing.~~

~~(2)~~

Gross unrealized appreciation, gross unrealized depreciation, and net depreciation for federal income tax purposes totaled $22,458, $32,232 and $9,774 respectively. The tax cost of investments is $481,432.

~~(3)~~

~~Except for warrants in ten publicly traded companies and common stock in five publicly traded companies, all investments are restricted at December~~March 31, ~~2010~~2012 and were valued at fair value as determined in good faith by the Board of Directors. No unrestricted securities of the same issuer are outstanding. The Company uses the Standard Industrial Code for classifying the industry grouping of its portfolio companies.

(4)	Debt investments of this portfolio company have been pledged as collateral under the Wells Facility.

(5)	Non-U.S. company or the company’s principal place of business is outside the United States.

(6)	Affiliate investment that is defined under the Investment Company Act of 1940 as companies in which ~~HTGC~~the Company owns at least 5% but not more than 25% of the voting securities of the company.

(7)	Control investment that is defined under the Investment Company Act of 1940 as companies in which ~~HTGC~~the Company owns at least 25% of the voting securities of the company, or has greater than 50% representation on its board.

(8)	Debt is on non-accrual status at March 31, 2012, and is therefore considered non-income producing.

See notes to consolidated financial statements (unaudited)

HERCULES TECHNOLOGY GROWTH CAPITAL, INC.

CONSOLIDATED SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS

December 31, 2011

(dollars in thousands)


Portfolio Company	Industry	Type of Investment⁽¹⁾	Principal Amount		Cost⁽²⁾		Value⁽³⁾
Anthera Pharmaceuticals Inc.	Drug Discovery & Development	Senior Debt Matures September 2014 Interest rate Prime + 7.3% or Floor rate of 10.55%	$	25,000	$	24,433	$	25,183
Aveo Pharmaceuticals, Inc.	Drug Discovery & Development	Senior Debt Matures June 2014 Interest rate Prime + 7.15% or Floor rate of 11.9%	$	25,000		25,360		26,110
Dicerna Pharmaceuticals, Inc.	Drug Discovery & Development	Senior Debt Matures January 2015 Interest rate Prime + 4.40% or Floor rate of 10.15%	$	12,000		11,665		11,665
NextWave Pharmaceuticals, Inc.	Drug Discovery & Development	Senior Debt Matures June 2015 Interest rate Prime + 4.3% or Floor rate of 9.55%	$	6,000		5,925		5,926
Concert Pharmaceuticals	Drug Discovery & Development	Senior Debt Matures July 2015 Interest rate Prime + 3.25% or Floor rate of 8.25%	$	7,500		7,350		7,350
PolyMedix, Inc.	Drug Discovery & Development	Senior Debt Matures September 2013 Interest rate Prime + 7.1% or Floor rate of 12.35%	$	6,763		6,594		6,729
Aegerion Pharmaceuticals, Inc.	Drug Discovery & Development	Senior Debt Matures September 2014 Interest rate Prime + 5.65% or Floor rate of 10.40%	$	10,000		10,070		10,070
Chroma Therapeutics, Ltd.⁽⁵⁾	Drug Discovery & Development	Senior Debt Matures September 2013 Interest rate Prime + 7.75% or Floor rate of 12.00%	$	7,633		7,958		7,879
NeurogesX, Inc.	Drug Discovery & Development	Senior Debt Matures February 2015 Interest rate Prime + 6.25% or Floor rate of 9.50%	$	15,000		14,558		14,558

Total Debt Drug Discovery & Development (26.79%)*						113,913		115,470

E-band Communications, Corp.⁽⁶⁾	Communications & Networking	Convertible Senior Debt Due on demand Interest rate Fixed 6.00%	$	356		356		—
Intelepeer, Inc.	Communications & Networking	Senior Debt Matures May 2013 Interest rate Prime + 8.12% or Floor rate of 11.37%	$	6,524		6,346		6,476
		Senior Debt Matures May 2012 Interest rate Prime + 4.25%	$	1,100		1,100		1,070

Total Intelepeer, Inc.						7,446		7,546

Ahhha, Inc.	Communications & Networking	Senior Debt Matures January 2015 Interest rate Fixed 10.00%	$	350		345		345
Pac-West Telecomm, Inc.	Communications & Networking	Senior Debt Matures October 2014 Interest rate Prime + 7.50% or Floor rate of 12.00%	$	4,369		4,196		4,196
PeerApp, Inc.	Communications & Networking	Senior Debt Matures April 2013 Interest rate Prime + 7.5% or Floor rate of 11.50%	$	1,776		1,814		1,835
PointOne, Inc.	Communications & Networking	Senior Debt Matures April 2013 Interest rate Libor + 9.0% or Floor rate of 11.50%	$	8,308		8,107		8,100
Stoke, Inc⁽⁴⁾	Communications & Networking	Senior Debt Matures May 2013 Interest rate Prime + 7.0% or Floor rate of 10.25%	$	2,627		2,586		2,612

Total Debt Communications & Networking (5.71%)*						24,850		24,634

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

HERCULES TECHNOLOGY GROWTH CAPITAL, INC.

CONSOLIDATED SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS—(Continued)

December 31, 2011

(dollars in thousands)


Portfolio Company	Industry	Type of Investment⁽¹⁾	Principal Amount		Cost⁽²⁾		Value⁽³⁾
Central Desktop, Inc.	Software	Senior Debt Matures April 2014 Interest rate Prime + 6.75% or Floor rate of 10.50%	$	3,000	$	2,894	$	2,954
Clickfox, Inc.	Software	Senior Debt Matures July 2013 Interest rate Prime + 6.00% or Floor rate of 11.25%	$	3,999		3,920		4,000
Kxen, Inc.	Software	Senior Debt Matures January 2015 Interest rate Prime + 5.08% or Floor rate of 8.33%	$	3,000		2,958		2,858
RichRelevance, Inc.	Software	Senior Debt Matures January 2015 Interest rate Prime + 3.25% or Floor rate of 7.50%	$	5,000		4,879		4,879
Blurb, Inc	Software	Senior Debt Matures December 2015 Interest rate Prime +5.25% or Floor rate 8.5%	$	5,000		4,873		4,873
SugarSync Inc.	Software	Senior Debt Matures April 2015 Interest rate Prime + 4.50% or Floor rate of 8.25%	$	2,000		1,950		1,950
White Sky, Inc.	Software	Senior Debt Matures June 2014 Interest rate Prime + 7.00% or Floor rate of 10.25%	$	1,418		1,357		1,400
Tada Innovations, Inc.	Software	Senior Debt Matures June 2012 Interest rate Prime + 3.25% or Floor rate of 6.50%	$	100		90		90

Total Debt Software (5.34%)*						22,921		23,004

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

HERCULES TECHNOLOGY GROWTH CAPITAL, INC.

CONSOLIDATED SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS—(Continued)

December 31, 2011

(dollars in thousands)


Portfolio Company	Industry	Type of Investment⁽¹⁾	Principal Amount		Cost⁽²⁾		Value⁽³⁾
Maxvision Holding, LLC.⁽⁷⁾	Electronics & Computer Hardware	Senior Debt Matures December 2013 Interest rate Prime + 8.25% or Floor rate of 12.00%, PIK interest 5.00%	$	4,185	$	4,143	$	—
		Senior Debt Matures December 2013 Interest rate Prime + 6.25% or Floor rate of 10.00%, PIK interest 2.00%	$	2,539		2,515		—
		Revolving Line of Credit Matures December 2013 Interest rate Prime +5.00% or Floor rate of 8.50%	$	892		1,027		1,027

Total Maxvision Holding, LLC						7,685		1,027

Total Debt Electronics & Computer Hardware (0.24%)*						7,685		1,027

Althea Technologies, Inc.	Specialty Pharmaceuticals	Senior Debt Matures October 2013 Interest rate Prime + 7.70% or Floor rate of 10.95%	$	10,359		10,315		10,584
Pacira Pharmaceuticals, Inc.	Specialty Pharmaceuticals	Senior Debt Matures August 2014 Interest rate Prime + 6.25% or Floor rate of 10.25%	$	11,250		11,257		11,397
		Senior Debt Matures August 2014 Interest rate Prime + 8.65% or Floor rate of 12.65%	$	15,000		14,386		14,574

Total Pacira Pharmaceuticals, Inc.						25,643		25,971

Quatrx Pharmaceuticals Company	Specialty Pharmaceuticals	Convertible Senior Debt Matures March 2012 Interest rate 8.00%	$	1,888		1,888		1,888

Total Debt Specialty Pharmaceuticals (8.92%)*						37,846		38,443

Achronix Semiconductor Corporation	Semiconductors	Senior Debt Matures January 2015 Interest rate Prime + 7.75% or Floor rate of 11.00%	$	2,500		2,329		2,329
Kovio Inc.	Semiconductors	Senior Debt Matures March 2015 Interest rate Prime + 5.50% or Floor rate of 9.25%	$	1,250		1,218		1,218
		Senior Debt Matures March 2015 Interest rate Prime + 6.00% or Floor rate of 9.75%	$	3,000		2,910		2,910

Total Kovio Inc.						4,128		4,128

Total Debt Semiconductors (1.50%)*						6,457		6,457

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

HERCULES TECHNOLOGY GROWTH CAPITAL, INC.

CONSOLIDATED SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS—(Continued)

December 31, 2011

(dollars in thousands)


Portfolio Company	Industry	Type of Investment⁽¹⁾	Principal Amount		Cost⁽²⁾		Value⁽³⁾
AcelRX Pharmaceuticals, Inc.	Drug Delivery	Senior Debt Matures December 2014 Interest rate Prime + 3.25% or Floor rate of 8.50%	$	10,000	$	9,773	$	9,579
		Senior Debt Matures December 2014 Interest rate Prime + 3.25% or Floor rate of 8.50%	$	10,000		9,772		9,578

Total AcelRX Pharmaceuticals, Inc.						19,545		19,157
Alexza Pharmaceuticals, Inc.⁽⁴⁾	Drug Delivery	Senior Debt Matures October 2013 Interest rate Prime + 6.5% or Floor rate of 10.75%	$	10,497		10,537		10,695
BIND Biosciences, Inc.	Drug Delivery	Senior Debt Matures July 2014 Interest rate Prime + 7.45% or Floor rate of 10.70%	$	5,000		4,730		4,880

Total BIND Biosciences, Inc.						4,730		4,880
Merrion Pharma, Plc.⁽⁵⁾	Drug Delivery	Senior Debt Matures January 2015 Interest rate Prime + 9.20% or Floor rate of 12.45%	$	5,000		4,765		3,819
Revance Therapeutics, Inc.	Drug Delivery	Senior Debt Matures March 2015 Interest rate Prime + 6.60% or Floor rate of 9.85%	$	22,000		21,379		21,379

Total Debt Drug Delivery (13.90%)*						60,956		59,930

Gelesis, Inc.⁽⁸⁾	Therapeutic	Senior Debt Matures April 2013 Interest rate Prime + 8.75% or Floor rate of 12.00%	$	3,428		3,514		3,254
Gynesonics, Inc.	Therapeutic	Senior Debt Matures October 2013 Interest rate Prime + 8.25% or Floor rate of 11.50%	$	5,336		5,309		5,383
Oraya Therapeutics, Inc.	Therapeutic	Senior Debt Matures March 2015 Interest rate Prime + 4.75% or Floor rate of 9.50%	$	7,500		7,377		7,377
Pacific Child & Family Associates, LLC	Therapeutic	Senior Debt Matures January 2015 Interest rate LIBOR + 8.0% or Floor rate of 10.50%	$	4,965		4,932		4,932
		Revolving Line of Credit Matures January 2015 Interest rate LIBOR + 6.5% or Floor rate of 9.00%	$	1,500		1,485		1,412
		Senior Debt Matures January 2015 Interest rate LIBOR + 10.50% or Floor rate of 13.0%, PIK interest 3.75%	$	5,900		6,259		6,436

Total Pacific Child & Family Associates, LLC						12,676		12,780

Total Debt Therapeutic (6.68%)*						28,876		28,794

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

HERCULES TECHNOLOGY GROWTH CAPITAL, INC.

CONSOLIDATED SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS—(Continued)

December 31, 2011

(dollars in thousands)


Portfolio Company	Industry	Type of Investment⁽¹⁾	Principal Amount		Cost⁽²⁾		Value⁽³⁾
InXpo, Inc.	Internet Consumer & Business Services	Senior Debt Matures March 2014 Interest rate Prime + 7.5% or Floor rate of 10.75%	$	3,192	$	3,083	$	3,147
Westwood One Communications	Internet Consumer & Business Services	Senior Debt Matures October 2016 Interest rate of 8.00%	$	21,000		19,059		19,479
Reply! Inc.⁽⁴⁾	Internet Consumer & Business Services	Senior Debt Matures June 2015 Interest rate Prime + 6.87% or Floor rate of 10.12%	$	13,000		12,877		13,131
MedCall	Internet Consumer & Business Services	Senior Debt Matures January 2016 Interest rate LIBOR + 7.50% or Floor rate of 9.50%	$	5,168		5,051		5,051
ScriptSave (Medical Security Card Company, LLC)	Internet Consumer & Business Services	Senior Debt Matures February 2016 Interest rate Prime + 8.75%	$	19,646		19,307		19,896
Trulia, Inc.	Internet Consumer & Business Services	Senior Debt Matures March 2015 Interest rate Prime + 2.75% or Floor rate of 6.00%	$	5,000		4,871		4,871
		Senior Debt Matures March 2015 Interest rate Prime + 5.50% or Floor rate of 8.75%	$	5,000		4,871		4,871

Total Trulia, Inc.						9,742		9,742

Vaultlogix, Inc.	Internet Consumer & Business Services	Senior Debt Matures September 2016 Interest rate Libor + 8.50% or Floor rate of 10.00%, PIK interest 2.50%	$	7,500		7,441		7,441
		Senior Debt	$	11,500		11,335		11,335
		Revolving Line of Credit Matures September 2015 Interest rate Libor + 6.00% or Floor rate of 7.50%	$	300		284		284

Total Vaultlogix, Inc.						19,060		19,060

Tectura Corporation	Internet Consumer & Business Services	Senior Debt Matures December 2012 Interest rate 11%	$	5,625		6,834		6,834
		Revolving Line of Credit Senior Debt Matures August 2012 Interest rate 11%	$	2,500		2,556		2,556
		Revolving Line of Credit Matures July 2012 Interest rate 11%, PIK interest 1.00%	$	17,487		17,738		17,738

Total Tectura Corporation						27,128		27,128

Total Debt Internet Consumer & Business Services (27.06%)						115,307		116,634

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

HERCULES TECHNOLOGY GROWTH CAPITAL, INC.

CONSOLIDATED SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS—(Continued)

December 31, 2011

(dollars in thousands)


Portfolio Company	Industry	Type of Investment⁽¹⁾	Principal Amount		Cost⁽²⁾		Value⁽³⁾
Box.net, Inc.	Information Services	Senior Debt Matures March 2015 Interest rate Prime + 3.75% or Floor rate of 7.50%	$	9,647	$	9,432	$	9,432
		Senior Debt Matures July 2014 Interest rate Prime + 5.25% or Floor rate of 8.50%	$	1,590		1,613		1,645

Total Box.net, Inc.						11,045		11,077

Cha Cha Search, Inc.	Information Services	Senior Debt Matures February 2015 Interest rate Prime + 6.25% or Floor rate of 9.50%	$	3,000		2,926		2,903
Jab Wireless, Inc.	Information Services	Senior Debt Matures August 2016 Interest rate Prime + 6.25% or Floor rate of 6.75%	$	20,272		19,993		19,993

Total Debt Information Services (7.88%)						33,964		33,973

Optiscan Biomedical, Corp.	Diagnostic	Senior Debt Matures December 2013 Interest rate Prime + 8.20% or Floor rate of 11.45%	$	10,750		10,884		11,147

Total Debt Diagnostic (2.59%)*						10,884		11,147

deCODE genetics ehf.	Biotechnology Tools	Senior Debt Matures September 2014 Interest rate Prime + 10.25% or Floor rate of 13.50%, PIK interest 2.00%	$	5,000		4,664		4,664
Labcyte, Inc.	Biotechnology Tools	Senior Debt Matures May 2013 Interest rate Prime + 8.6% or Floor rate of 11.85%	$	2,416		2,425		2,479
Cempra Holdings LLC	Biotechnology Tools	Senior Debt Matures December 2015 Interest rate Prime + 7.05% or Floor rate of 10.30%	$	10,000		9,721		9,721

Total Debt Biotechnology Tools (3.91%)*						16,810		16,864

Entrigue Surgical, Inc.	Surgical Devices	Senior Debt Matures December 2014 Interest rate Prime + 5.90% or Floor rate of 9.65%	$	3,000		2,879		2,879
Transmedics, Inc.⁽⁴⁾	Surgical Devices	Senior Debt Matures February 2014 Interest rate Prime + 9.70% or Floor rate of 12.95%	$	8,375		8,602		8,602

Total Debt Surgical Devices (2.66%)*						11,481		11,481

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

HERCULES TECHNOLOGY GROWTH CAPITAL, INC.

CONSOLIDATED SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS—(Continued)

December 31, 2011

(dollars in thousands)


Portfolio Company	Industry	Type of Investment⁽¹⁾	Principal Amount		Cost⁽²⁾		Value⁽³⁾
Neoprobe Corporation	Media/Content/Info	Senior Debt Matures December 2014 Interest rate Prime + 6.75% or Floor rate of 10.00%	$	7,000	$	6,733	$	6,733
Women’s Marketing, Inc.	Media/Content/Info	Senior Debt Matures May 2016 Interest rate Libor + 9.50% or Floor rate of 12.00%, PIK interest 3.00%	$	10,000		9,956		10,156
		Senior Debt Matures November 2015 Interest rate Libor + 7.50% or Floor rate of 10.0%	$	9,710		9,503		9,896
		Senior Debt Matures November 2015 Interest rate Libor + 7.50% or Floor rate of 10.0%	$	9,956		9,744		9,744

Total Women’s Marketing, Inc.						29,203		29,796

Total Debt Media/Content/Info (8.47%)*						35,936		36,529

BrightSource Energy, Inc.⁽⁴⁾	Clean Tech	Senior Debt Matures December 2011 Interest rate Prime + 7.75% or Floor rate of 11.0%	$	11,250		11,122		11,122
		Senior Debt Matures December 2012 Interest rate Prime + 9.55% or Floor rate of 12.8%	$	13,750		13,593		13,593

Total BrightSource Energy, Inc.						24,715		24,715

EcoMotors, Inc.	Clean Tech	Senior Debt Matures February 2014 Interest rate Prime + 6.1% or Floor rate of 9.35%	$	4,879		4,713		4,859
Enphase Energy, Inc.	Clean Tech	Senior Debt Matures June 2014 Interest rate Prime + 5.75% or Floor rate of 9.0%	$	4,898		4,784		4,748
NanoSolar, Inc.	Clean Tech	Senior Debt Matures September 2014 Interest rate Prime + 7.75% or Floor rate of 11.0%	$	9,212		8,795		8,795
Integrated Photovoltaics	Clean Tech	Senior Debt Matures February 2015 Interest rate Prime + 7.375% or Floor rate of 10.625%	$	3,000		2,875		2,875
Propel Biofuels, Inc.	Clean Tech	Senior Debt Matures September 2013 Interest rate of 11.0%	$	1,348		1,356		1,320
SCIenergy, Inc.	Clean Tech	Senior Debt Matures October 2014 Interest rate 6.25%	$	202		202		202
		Senior Debt Matures August 2015 Interest rate 8.15%	$	5,000		4,883		4,883

Total SCIenergy, Inc.						5,085		5,085
Solexel, Inc.	Clean Tech	Senior Debt Matures June 2013 Interest rate Prime + 8.25% or Floor rate of 11.50%	$	937		594		594
		Senior Debt Matures June 2013 Interest rate Prime + 7.25% or Floor rate of 10.50%	$	8,120		8,389		8,389

Total Solexel, Inc.						8,983		8,983

Total Debt Clean Tech (14.24%)*						61,306		61,380

Total Debt (135.90%)						589,192		585,767

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

HERCULES TECHNOLOGY GROWTH CAPITAL, INC.

CONSOLIDATED SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS—(Continued)

December 31, 2011

(dollars in thousands)


Portfolio Company	Industry	Type of Investment⁽¹⁾	Principal Amount	Cost⁽²⁾		Value⁽³⁾
Acceleron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.	Drug Discovery & Development	Common Stock Warrants		$	39	$	42
		Preferred Stock Warrants			69		273
		Preferred Stock Warrants			35		51

Total Warrants Acceleron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.					143		366

Anthera Pharmaceuticals Inc.	Drug Discovery & Development	Common Stock Warrants			541		551
		Common Stock Warrants			443		451

Total Warrants Anthera Pharmaceuticals Inc.					984		1,002

Dicerna Pharmaceuticals, Inc.	Drug Discovery & Development	Preferred Stock Warrants			236		69
		Common Stock Warrants			28		—
		Preferred Stock Warrants			311		137

Total Warrants Dicerna Pharmaceuticals, Inc.					575		206

EpiCept Corporation⁽⁵⁾	Drug Discovery & Development	Common Stock Warrants			4		15
Concert Pharmaceuticals, Inc.	Drug Discovery & Development	Preferred Stock Warrants			234		233
NextWave Pharmaceuticals, Inc.	Drug Discovery & Development	Preferred Stock Warrants			126		125
Horizon Pharma, Inc.	Drug Discovery & Development	Common Stock Warrants			231		—
Merrimack Pharmaceuticals, Inc.	Drug Discovery & Development	Preferred Stock Warrants			155		1,116
Paratek Pharmaceuticals, Inc.	Drug Discovery & Development	Preferred Stock Warrants			137		68
PolyMedix, Inc.	Drug Discovery & Development	Common Stock Warrants			480		97
Portola Pharmaceuticals, Inc.	Drug Discovery & Development	Preferred Stock Warrants			152		207
Aegerion Pharmaceuticals, Inc.	Drug Discovery & Development	Common Stock Warrants			69		1,115
Chroma Therapeutics, Ltd.⁽⁵⁾	Drug Discovery & Development	Preferred Stock Warrants			490		387
NeurogesX, Inc.	Drug Discovery & Development	Preferred Stock Warrants			503		122

Total Warrants Drug Discovery & Development (1.17%)*					4,283		5,059

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

HERCULES TECHNOLOGY GROWTH CAPITAL, INC.

CONSOLIDATED SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS—(Continued)

December 31, 2011

(dollars in thousands)


Portfolio Company	Industry	Type of Investment⁽¹⁾	Principal Amount	Cost⁽²⁾		Value⁽³⁾
Affinity Videonet, Inc.	Communications & Networking	Preferred Stock Warrants		$	102	$	165
IKANO Communications, Inc.	Communications & Networking	Preferred Stock Warrants			45		—
		Preferred Stock Warrants			72		—

Total IKANO Communications, Inc.					117		—

Intelepeer, Inc.	Communications & Networking	Preferred Stock Warrants			101		92
Neonova Holding Company	Communications & Networking	Preferred Stock Warrants			94		28
Pac-West Telecomm, Inc.	Communications & Networking	Preferred Stock Warrants			121		—
PeerApp, Inc.	Communications & Networking	Preferred Stock Warrants			61		23
Peerless Network, Inc.	Communications & Networking	Preferred Stock Warrants			95		206
Ping Identity Corporation	Communications & Networking	Preferred Stock Warrants			52		109
PointOne, Inc.	Communications & Networking	Common Stock Warrants			131		5
Purcell Systems, Inc.	Communications & Networking	Preferred Stock Warrants			123		121
Stoke, Inc⁽⁴⁾	Communications & Networking	Preferred Stock Warrants			53		149
		Preferred Stock Warrants			65		81

Total Stoke, Inc.					118		230

Total Warrants Communications & Networking (0.23%)*					1,115		979

Atrenta, Inc.	Software	Preferred Stock Warrants			136		815
		Preferred Stock Warrants			95		284

Total Atrenta, Inc.					231		1,099

Blurb, Inc.	Software	Preferred Stock Warrants			323		855
		Preferred Stock Warrants			636		636

Total Blurb, Inc.					959		1,491

Braxton Technologies, LLC.	Software	Preferred Stock Warrants			189		—
Bullhorn, Inc.	Software	Preferred Stock Warrants			43		229
Central Desktop, Inc.	Software	Preferred Stock Warrants			108		398
Clickfox, Inc.	Software	Preferred Stock Warrants			329		522
Forescout Technologies, Inc.	Software	Preferred Stock Warrants			99		142
HighRoads, Inc.	Software	Preferred Stock Warrants			45		7
Kxen, Inc.	Software	Preferred Stock Warrants			47		22
RichRelevance, Inc.	Software	Preferred Stock Warrants			98		12
Rockyou, Inc.	Software	Preferred Stock Warrants			116		1
Sportvision, Inc.	Software	Preferred Stock Warrants			39		—
SugarSync Inc.	Software	Preferred Stock Warrants			78		162
Daegis Inc. (pka Unify Corporation)	Software	Common Stock Warrants			1,434		237
White Sky, Inc.	Software	Preferred Stock Warrants			54		3
Tada Innovations, Inc.	Software	Preferred Stock Warrants			25		25
WildTangent, Inc.	Software	Preferred Stock Warrants			238		22

Total Warrants Software (1.01%)*					4,132		4,372

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

HERCULES TECHNOLOGY GROWTH CAPITAL, INC.

CONSOLIDATED SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS—(Continued)

December 31, 2011

(dollars in thousands)


Portfolio Company	Industry	Type of Investment⁽¹⁾	Principal Amount	Cost⁽²⁾		Value⁽³⁾
Luminus Devices, Inc.	Electronics & Computer Hardware	Preferred Stock Warrants		$	334	$	—
		Preferred Stock Warrants			84		—
		Preferred Stock Warrants			183		—

Total Luminus Devices, Inc.					601		—

Shocking Technologies, Inc.	Electronics & Computer Hardware	Preferred Stock Warrants			63		196

Total Warrant Electronics & Computer Hardware (0.05%)*					664		196

Althea Technologies, Inc.	Specialty Pharmaceuticals	Preferred Stock Warrants			309		516
Pacira Pharmaceuticals, Inc.	Specialty Pharmaceuticals	Common Stock Warrants			1,086		425
Quatrx Pharmaceuticals Company	Specialty Pharmaceuticals	Preferred Stock Warrants			528		—

Total Warrants Specialty Pharmaceuticals (0.22%)*					1,923		941

Annie’s, Inc.	Consumer & Business Products	Preferred Stock Warrants			321		250
IPA Holdings, LLC	Consumer & Business Products	Preferred Stock Warrants			275		58
Market Force Information, Inc.	Consumer & Business Products	Preferred Stock Warrants			24		118
Wageworks, Inc.	Consumer & Business Products	Preferred Stock Warrants			252		2,495
Seven Networks, Inc.	Consumer & Business Products	Preferred Stock Warrants			174		—

Total Warrant Consumer & Business Products (0.68%)*					1,046		2,921

Achronix Semiconductor Corporation	Semiconductors	Preferred Stock Warrants			160		145
Enpirion, Inc.	Semiconductors	Preferred Stock Warrants			157		—
iWatt, Inc.	Semiconductors	Preferred Stock Warrants			46		3
		Preferred Stock Warrants			582		10

Total iWatt, Inc.					628		13

Kovio Inc.	Semiconductors	Preferred Stock Warrants			92		4
NEXX Systems, Inc.	Semiconductors	Preferred Stock Warrants			297		1,328
Quartics, Inc.	Semiconductors	Preferred Stock Warrants			53		—

Total Warrants Semiconductors (0.35%)*					1,387		1,490

AcelRX Pharmaceuticals, Inc.	Drug Delivery	Common Stock Warrants			178		41
		Common Stock Warrants			178		41

Total AcelRX Pharmaceuticals, Inc.					356		82

Alexza Pharmaceuticals, Inc.⁽⁴⁾	Drug Delivery	Preferred Stock Warrants			645		72
BIND Biosciences, Inc.	Drug Delivery	Preferred Stock Warrants			291		427
Merrion Pharma, Plc.⁽⁵⁾	Drug Delivery	Common Stock Warrants			214		194
Transcept Pharmaceuticals, Inc.	Drug Delivery	Common Stock Warrants			36		62
		Common Stock Warrants			51		93

Total Transcept Pharmaceuticals, Inc.					87		155

Revance Therapeutics, Inc.	Drug Delivery	Preferred Stock Warrants			557		565

Total Warrant Drug Delivery (0.35%)*					2,150		1,495

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

HERCULES TECHNOLOGY GROWTH CAPITAL, INC.

CONSOLIDATED SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS—(Continued)

December 31, 2011

(dollars in thousands)


Portfolio Company	Industry	Type of Investment⁽¹⁾	Principal Amount	Cost⁽²⁾		Value⁽³⁾
Gelesis, Inc.	Therapeutic	Preferred Stock Warrants		$	78	$	106
BARRX Medical, Inc.	Therapeutic	Preferred Stock Warrants			76		189
EKOS Corporation	Therapeutic	Preferred Stock Warrants			327		—
Gynesonics, Inc.	Therapeutic	Preferred Stock Warrants			228		233
Light Science Oncology, Inc.	Therapeutic	Preferred Stock Warrants			99		—
Novasys Medical, Inc.	Therapeutic	Preferred Stock Warrants			125		13
Oraya Therapeutics, Inc.	Therapeutic	Preferred Stock Warrants			551		551

Total Warrants Therapeutic (0.25%)*					1,484		1,092

Cozi Group, Inc.	Internet Consumer & Business Services	Preferred Stock Warrants			147		—
Invoke Solutions, Inc.	Internet Consumer & Business Services	Common Stock Warrants			6		—
		Common Stock Warrants			6		—
		Common Stock Warrants			11		—
		Common Stock Warrants			15		—
		Common Stock Warrants			44		—

Total Invoke Solutions, Inc.					82		—

InXpo, Inc.	Internet Consumer & Business Services	Preferred Stock Warrants			98		56
Prism Education Group, Inc.	Internet Consumer & Business Services	Preferred Stock Warrants			43		—
RazorGator Interactive Group, Inc.	Internet Consumer & Business Services	Preferred Stock Warrants			1,224		—
Reply! Inc.⁽⁴⁾	Internet Consumer & Business Services	Preferred Stock Warrants			320		395
Trulia, Inc.	Internet Consumer & Business Services	Preferred Stock Warrants			188		413
Tectura Corporation	Internet Consumer & Business Services	Preferred Stock Warrants			51		26

Total Warrants Internet Consumer & Business Services (0.21%)					2,153		890

Lilliputian Systems, Inc.	Energy	Preferred Stock Warrants			106		—
		Common Stock Warrants			49		—

Total Lilliputian Systems, Inc.					155		—

Total Warrants Energy (0.00%)*					155		—

Box.net, Inc.	Information Services	Preferred Stock Warrants			117		1,557
		Preferred Stock Warrants			73		2,280
		Preferred Stock Warrants			193		233

Total Box.net, Inc.					383		4,070

Buzznet, Inc.	Information Services	Preferred Stock Warrants			9		—
Cha Cha Search, Inc.	Information Services	Preferred Stock Warrants			58		1
Magi.com (pka Hi5 Networks, Inc.)	Information Services	Preferred Stock Warrants			213		—
Jab Wireless, Inc.	Information Services	Preferred Stock Warrants			265		332
Solutionary, Inc.	Information Services	Preferred Stock Warrants			96		—
Intelligent Beauty, Inc.	Information Services	Preferred Stock Warrants			230		83
Zeta Interactive Corporation	Information Services	Preferred Stock Warrants			172		237

Total Warrants Information Services (1.10%)					1,426		4,723

Optiscan Biomedical, Corp.	Diagnostic	Preferred Stock Warrants			1,069		872

Total Warrants Diagnostic (0.20%)*					1,069		872

deCODE genetics ehf.	Biotechnology Tools	Preferred Stock Warrants			305		305
Labcyte, Inc.	Biotechnology Tools	Common Stock Warrants			197		263
Cempra Holdings LLC	Biotechnology Tools	Preferred Stock Warrants			187		186
NuGEN Technologies, Inc.	Biotechnology Tools	Preferred Stock Warrants			45		203
		Preferred Stock Warrants			33		15

Total NuGEN Technologies, Inc.					78		218

Total Warrants Biotechnology Tools (0.23%)*					767		972

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

HERCULES TECHNOLOGY GROWTH CAPITAL, INC.

CONSOLIDATED SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS—(Continued)

December 31, 2011

(dollars in thousands)


Portfolio Company	Industry	Type of Investment⁽¹⁾	Principal Amount	Cost⁽²⁾		Value⁽³⁾
Entrigue Surgical, Inc.	Surgical Devices	Preferred Stock Warrants		$	87	$	85
Transmedics, Inc.⁽⁴⁾	Surgical Devices	Preferred Stock Warrants			225		—

Total Warrants Surgical Devices (0.02%)*					312		85

Glam Media, Inc.	Media/Content/Info	Preferred Stock Warrants			482		2
Neoprobe Corporation	Media/Content/Info	Common Stock Warrants			244		245
Everyday Health, Inc. (Waterfront Media, Inc.)	Media/Content/Info	Preferred Stock Warrants			60		504

Total Warrants Media/Content/Info (0.17%)*					786		751

BrightSource Energy, Inc.⁽⁴⁾	Clean Tech	Preferred Stock Warrants			675		834
Calera, Inc.	Clean Tech	Preferred Stock Warrants			513		475
EcoMotors, Inc.	Clean Tech	Preferred Stock Warrants			154		323
		Common Stock Warrants			154		323

Total EcoMotors, Inc.					308		646
Enphase Energy, Inc.	Clean Tech	Preferred Stock Warrants			102		49
GreatPoint Energy, Inc.	Clean Tech	Preferred Stock Warrants			548		208
NanoSolar, Inc.	Clean Tech	Preferred Stock Warrants			355		355
Propel Biofuels, Inc.	Clean Tech	Preferred Stock Warrants			211		170
SCIenergy, Inc.	Clean Tech	Preferred Stock Warrants			8		2
		Preferred Stock Warrants			130		30

Total SCIenergy, Inc.					138		32
Solexel, Inc.	Clean Tech	Preferred Stock Warrants			1,161		275
Trilliant, Inc.	Clean Tech	Preferred Stock Warrants			162		82
Integrated Photovoltaics	Clean Tech	Preferred Stock Warrants			82		81
Total Warrants Clean Tech (0.74%)*					4,255		3,207

Total Warrants (6.97%)					29,107		30,045

Aegerion Pharmaceuticals, Inc.	Drug Discovery & Development	Common Stock			1,092		2,411
Aveo Pharmaceuticals	Drug Discovery & Development	Common Stock			842		2,887
Dicerna Pharmaceuticals, Inc.	Drug Discovery & Development	Preferred Stock			503		374
Inotek Pharmaceuticals Corp.	Drug Discovery & Development	Preferred Stock			1,500		—
Merrimack Pharmaceuticals, Inc.	Drug Discovery & Development	Preferred Stock			2,000		3,825
Paratek Pharmaceuticals, Inc.	Drug Discovery & Development	Preferred Stock			1,000		1,231

Total Equity Drug Discovery & Development (2.49%)*					6,937		10,728

Acceleron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.	Drug Delivery	Preferred Stock			243		163
Acceleron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.		Preferred Stock			98		138
Acceleron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.		Preferred Stock			60		61
Acceleron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.		Preferred Stock			1,000		724

Total Acceleron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.					1,401		1,086
Transcept Pharmaceuticals, Inc.	Drug Delivery	Common Stock			500		325

Total Equity Drug Delivery (0.33%)*					1,901		1,411

E-band Communications, Corp.⁽⁶⁾	Communications & Networking	Preferred Stock			2,880		—
Neonova Holding Company	Communications & Networking	Preferred Stock			250		212
Peerless Network, Inc.	Communications & Networking	Preferred Stock			1,000		2,335
Stoke, Inc⁽⁴⁾	Communications & Networking	Preferred Stock			500		458

Total Equity Communications & Networking (0.70%)*					4,630		3,005

Atrenta, Inc.	Software	Preferred Stock			250		474

Total Equity Software (0.11%)*					250		474

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

HERCULES TECHNOLOGY GROWTH CAPITAL, INC.

CONSOLIDATED SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS—(Continued)

December 31, 2011

(dollars in thousands)


Portfolio Company	Industry	Type of Investment⁽¹⁾	Principal Amount	Cost⁽²⁾		Value⁽³⁾
Maxvision Holding, LLC.⁽⁷⁾	Electronics & Computer Hardware	Common Stock		$	3,581	$	—
Spatial Photonics, Inc.⁽⁸⁾	Electronics & Computer Hardware	Preferred Stock			268		—

Total Equity Electronics & Computer Hardware (0.00%)*					3,849		—

Quatrx Pharmaceuticals Company	Specialty Pharmaceuticals	Preferred Stock			750		—

Total Equity Specialty Pharmaceuticals (0.00%)*					750		—

IPA Holdings, LLC	Consumer & Business Products	Preferred Stock			500		360
Market Force Information, Inc.	Consumer & Business Products	Preferred Stock			500		491
Caivis Acquisition Corporation	Consumer & Business Products	Common Stock			880		—
Wageworks, Inc.	Consumer & Business Products	Preferred Stock			250		388

Total Equity Consumer & Business Products (0.29%)*					2,130		1,239

iWatt, Inc.	Semiconductors	Preferred Stock			490		984
NEXX Systems, Inc.	Semiconductors	Preferred Stock			277		802

Total Equity Semiconductors (0.41%)*					767		1,786

BARRX Medical, Inc.	Therapeutic	Preferred Stock			1,500		3,628
Gelesis, Inc.	Therapeutic	Common Stock			—		108
		Preferred Stock			425		519
		Preferred Stock			500		520

Total Gelesis, Inc.					925		1,147
Gynesonics, Inc.	Therapeutic	Preferred Stock			250		156
Gynesonics, Inc.		Preferred Stock			283		295

Total Gynesonics, Inc.					533		451
Novasys Medical, Inc.	Therapeutic	Preferred Stock			1,000		799

Total Equity Therapeutic (1.40%)*					3,958		6,025

Cozi Group, Inc.	Internet Consumer & Business Services	Preferred Stock			177		44
RazorGator Interactive Group, Inc.	Internet Consumer & Business Services	Preferred Stock			1,000		—

Total Equity Internet Consumer & Business Services (0.01%)					1,177		44

Box.net, Inc.	Information Services	Preferred Stock			500		3,543
		Preferred Stock			1,500		2,564

Total Box.net, Inc.					2,000		6,107
Buzznet, Inc.	Information Services	Preferred Stock			250		26
Magi.com (pka Hi5 Networks, Inc.)	Information Services	Preferred Stock			250		247
Solutionary, Inc.	Information Services	Preferred Stock			250		55
Good Technologies, Inc. (pka Visto Corporation)	Information Services	Common Stock			603		90
Zeta Interactive Corporation	Information Services	Preferred Stock			500		629

Total Equity Information Services (1.66%)					3,853		7,154

Novadaq Technologies, Inc.⁽⁵⁾	Diagnostic	Common Stock			1,057		671
Optiscan Biomedical, Corp.	Diagnostic	Preferred Stock			3,655		2,468

Total Equity Diagnostic (0.73%)*					4,712		3,139

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

HERCULES TECHNOLOGY GROWTH CAPITAL, INC.

CONSOLIDATED SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS—(Continued)

December 31, 2011

(dollars in thousands)


Portfolio Company	Industry	Type of Investment⁽¹⁾	Principal Amount	Cost⁽²⁾		Value⁽³⁾
Kamada, LTD.	Biotechnology Tools	Common Stock		$	427	$	384
NuGEN Technologies, Inc.	Biotechnology Tools	Preferred Stock			500		473

Total Equity Biotechnology Tools (0.20%)*					927		857

Transmedics, Inc.⁽⁴⁾	Surgical Devices	Preferred Stock			1,400		—

Total Equity Surgical Devices (0.00%)*					1,400		—

Everyday Health, Inc. (pka Waterfront Media, Inc.)	Media/Content/ Info	Preferred Stock			1,000		1,196

Total Equity Media/Content/Info (0.28%)*					1,000		1,196

Total Equity (8.60%)					38,241		37,058

Total Investments (151.47%)				$	656,540	$	652,870

*	Value as a percent of net assets

(1)	Preferred and common stock, warrants, and equity interests are generally non-income producing.

(2)	Gross unrealized appreciation, gross unrealized depreciation, and net depreciation for federal income tax purposes totaled $34,519, $39,387 and $4,868 respectively. The tax cost of investments is $658,010.

(3)

Except for warrants in thirteen publicly traded companies and common stock in five publicly traded companies, all investments are restricted at December 31, 2011 and were valued at fair value as determined in good faith by the Board of Directors. No unrestricted securities of the same issuer are outstanding. The Company uses the Standard Industrial Code for classifying the industry grouping of its portfolio companies.

(4)	Debt investments of this portfolio company have been pledged as collateral under the Wells Facility.

(5)	Non-U.S. company or the company’s principal place of business is outside the United States.

(6)	Affiliate investment that is defined under the Investment Company Act of 1940 as companies in which the Company owns at least 5% but not more than 25% of the voting securities of the company.

(7)	Control investment that is defined under the Investment Company Act of 1940 as companies in which the Company owns at least 25% of the voting securities of the company, or has greater than 50% representation on its board.

(8)	Debt is on non-accrual status at December 31, ~~2010,~~2011, and is therefore considered non-income producing.

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

HERCULES TECHNOLOGY GROWTH CAPITAL, INC.

CONSOLIDATED ~~STATEMENT~~STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(unaudited)

(in thousands, except per share data)


	Three Months Ended September 30,						Nine Months Ended September 30,						Three Months Ended March 31,
	2011			2010			2011			2010			2012		2011
Investment income:
Interest Income
Investment Income:
Interest income
Non Control/Non Affiliate investments	$	16,405		$	13,356		$	50,146		$	35,649		$	20,281	$	16,456
Affiliate investments		5			—			9			—			6		—
Control investments		—			766			777			2,487			13		—

Total interest income	$	16,410		$	14,122		$	50,932		$	38,136			20,300		16,456

Fees
Non Control/Non Affiliate investments		2,264			1,524			7,639			4,285			2,067		2,695
Control investments		10			—			84			246

Total fees		2,274			1,524			7,723			4,531			2,067		2,695

Total investment income		18,684			15,646			58,655			42,667


Total operating income														22,367		19,151
Operating expenses:
Interest		3,408			2,139			8,803			6,237			3,896		2,233
Loan fees		881			333			2,493			936			1,076		934
General and administrative		1,659			1,680			6,196			5,220			1,817		2,206
Employee Compensation:
Compensation and benefits		3,273			2,594			9,888			7,691			3,395		3,253
Stock-based compensation		870			752			2,518			1,959			808		721

Total employee compensation		4,143			3,346			12,406			9,650			4,203		3,974

Total operating expenses		10,091			7,498			29,898			22,043			10,992		9,347

Net investment income		8,593			8,148			28,757			20,624			11,375		9,804
Net realized gain (loss) on investments		(1,601	)		(18,865	)		3,429			(15,144	)
Net realized gains on investments
Non Control/Non Affiliate investments														2,877		4,370

Total net realized gain on investments														2,877		4,370

Net increase (decrease) in unrealized appreciation on investments		(769	)		2,894			(2,823	)		(12,218	)
Non Control/Non Affiliate investments														1,751		(14,315	)
Affiliate investments														1,076		(1,037	)
Control investments														26		—

Net realized and unrealized gain (loss)		(2,370	)		(15,971	)		606			(27,362	)
Total net unrealized (depreciation) appreciation on investments														2,853		(15,352	)

Total net realized (unrealized) gain														5,730		(10,982	)

Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from operations	$	6,223		$	(7,823	)	$	29,363		$	(6,738	)	$	17,105	$	(1,178	)


Net investment income before investment gains and losses per common share:
Net investment income before provision for income taxes and investment gains and losses per common share:
Basic	$	0.20		$	0.23		$	0.67		$	0.57		$	0.24	$	0.23


Change in net assets per common share:
Net increase in net assets resulting from operations per common share
Basic	$	0.14		$	(0.23	)	$	0.67		$	(0.20	)	$	0.36	$	(0.03	)

Diluted	$	0.14		$	(0.23	)	$	0.67		$	(0.20	)	$	0.36	$	(0.03	)


Weighted average shares outstanding:
Weighted average shares outstanding
Basic		43,071			35,208			42,920			35,227			47,018		42,737

Diluted		43,337			35,208			43,251			35,227			47,210		42,737

See notes to consolidated financial statements (unaudited).

HERCULES TECHNOLOGY GROWTH CAPITAL, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN NET ASSETS

(unaudited)

(dollars and shares in thousands)


	Common Stock					Capital in excess of par value				Unrealized Appreciation on Investments			Accumulated Realized Gains(Losses) on Investments				Distributions in Excess of Investment Income				Provision for Income Taxes on Investment Gains				Net Assets				Common Stock						Capital in excess of par value			Unrealized Appreciation on Investments			Accumulated Realized Gains (Losses) on Investments			Distributions in Excess of Investment Income			Provision for Income Taxes on Investment Gains			Net Assets
	Shares			Par Value									Accumulated Realized Gains(Losses) on Investments			Shares								Par Value											Capital in excess of par value			Unrealized Appreciation on Investments			Accumulated Realized Gains (Losses) on Investments			Distributions in Excess of Investment Income			Provision for Income Taxes on Investment Gains			Net Assets
Balance at December 31, 2009		35,634		$	35	Capital in excess of par value			$	Unrealized Appreciation on Investments	409,036		$	(10,029	)		Distributions in Excess of Investment Income	$	(28,129	)	Provision for Income Taxes on Investment Gains		$	(4,056	Net Assets	)		$	(342	)		$	366,515
Balance at December 31, 2010																														43,444			$	43	$	477,549		$	(8,038	)	$	(51,033	)	$	(5,648	)	$	(342	)	$	412,531
Net increase in net assets resulting from operations		—			—		—				(12,218	)		(15,144	)			20,624				—				(6,738	)			—				—		—			(15,352	)		4,370			9,804			—			(1,178	)
Issuance of common stock		413			—		1,856				—			—				—				—				1,856				3				—		15			—			—			—			—			15
Issuance of common stock under restricted stock plan		488			1		—				—			—				—				—				1				297				—		—			—			—			—			—			—
Acquisition of common stock under repurchase plan		(403	)		—		(3,699	)			—			—				—				—				(3,699	)
Issuance of common stock as stock dividend		140			—		1,332				—			—				—				—				1,332				61				—		668			—			—			—			—			668
Retired shares from net issuance		(114	)		—		(1,160	)			—			—				—				—				(1,160	)			(1	)			—		(9	)		—			—			—			—			(9	)
Dividends declared		—			—		—				—			—				(21,582	)			—				(21,582	)			—				—		—			—			—			(9,556	)		—			(9,556	)
Stock-based compensation		—			—		2,024				—			—				—				—				2,024				—				—		736			—			—			—			—			736

Balance at September 30, 2010		36,158		$	36	$	409,389			$	(22,247	)	$	(43,273	)		$	(5,014	)		$	(342	)		$	338,549
Balance at March 31, 2011																														43,804			$	43	$	478,959		$	(23,390	)	$	(46,663	)	$	(5,400	)	$	(342	)	$	403,207


Balance at December 31, 2010		43,444		$	43	$	477,549			$	(8,038	)	$	(51,033	)		$	(5,647	)		$	(342	)		$	412,532
Balance at December 31, 2011																														43,853			$	44	$	484,244		$	(3,431	)	$	(43,042	)	$	(6,432	)	$	(342	)	$	431,041

Net increase in net assets resulting from operations		—		$	—	$	—			$	(2,823	)	$	3,429			$	28,757			$	—			$	29,363				—				—		—			2,853			2,877			11,375			—			17,105
Issuance of common stock		167			—		893				—			—				—				—				893				5,425				5		49,773			—			—			—			—			49,778
Issuance of common stock under restricted stock plan		253			—		—				—			—				—				—				—				620				1		—			—			—			—			—			1
Issuance of common stock as stock dividend		123			—		1,245				—			—				—				—				1,245				62				—		670			—			—			—			—			670
Retired shares from net issuance		(79	)		—		(887	)			—			—				—				—				(887	)			(239	)			—		(2,562	)		—			—			—			—			(2,562	)
Issuance of the Convertible Senior Notes (see Note 4)		—			—		5,190				—			—				—				—				5,190
Dividends declared		—			—		—				—			—				(28,853	)			—				(28,853	)			—				—		—			—			—			(11,412	)		—			(11,412	)
Stock-based compensation		—			—		2,567				—			—				—				—				2,567				—				—		826			—			—			—			—			826

Balance at September 30, 2011		43,908		$	43	$	486,557			$	(10,861	)	$	(47,604	)		$	(5,743	)		$	(342	)		$	422,050
Balance at March 31, 2012																														49,721			$	50	$	532,951		$	(578	)	$	(40,165	)	$	(6,469	)	$	(342	)	$	485,447

See notes to consolidated financial statements (unaudited).

HERCULES TECHNOLOGY GROWTH CAPITAL, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS

(unaudited)

(dollars in thousands)


							For the Three Months Ended
	Nine Months Ended September 30,						March 31,
	2011			2010			2012			2011
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from operations	$	29,363		$	(6,738	)	$	17,105		$	(1,178	)
Adjustments to reconcile net increase in net assets resulting from operations to net cash used in and provided by
Adjustments to reconcile net increase in net assets resulting from operations to net cash used in and provided by operating activities:
Purchase of investments		(337,631	)		(242,360	)		(64,961	)		(85,024	)
Principal payments received on investments		223,193			180,754			35,533			85,988
Proceeds from sale of investments		17,053			7,295			8,726			16,897
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments		2,823			12,218			(2,853	)		15,352
Net realized (gain) loss on investments		(3,429	)		15,144
Net realized (gain) on investments								(2,877	)		(4,370	)
Accretion of paid-in-kind principal		(1,651	)		(2,366	)		(280	)		(890	)
Accretion of loan discounts		(5,752	)		(3,026	)		(916	)		(1,740	)
Accretion of loan exit fees								(2,685	)		—
Amortization of deferred loan origination revenue								(198	)		(1,852	)
Unearned fees related to unfunded commitments								(2,360	)		—
Accretion of loan discount on Convertible Senior Notes		496			—			271			—
Accretion of loan exit fees		—			(956	)
Amortization of debt fees and issuance costs								913			—
Depreciation		268			298			71			89
Stock-based compensation		480			553
Amortization of restricted stock grants		2,088			1,471
Amortization of deferred loan origination revenue		(1,755	)		(2,137	)
Stock-based compensation and amortization of restricted stock grants								826			736
Change in operating assets and liabilities:
Interest receivable		(147	)		(347	)
Interest and fees receivable								(143	)		22
Prepaid expenses and other assets		3,279			541			(75	)		2,071
Accounts payable		(810	)		(103	)		(51	)		(406	)
Income tax payable		—			8
Accrued liabilities		(429	)		(5,891	)		(3,733	)		(870	)


Net cash used in by operating activities		(72,561	)		(45,642	)
Net cash provided by (used in) by operating activities								(17,687	)		24,825
Cash flows from investing activities:
Purchases of capital equipment		(122	)		(218	)		(12	)		(27	)
Other long-term assets		—			(137	)		—			(1,788	)


Net cash used in investing activities		(122	)		(355	)
Net cash (used in) investing activities								(12	)		(1,815	)
Cash flows from financing activities:
Proceeds from issuance of common stock, net		6			1,856			47,218			6
Stock repurchase program		—			(3,699	)
Forfeiture of Stock due to Employee Option Exercises		—			(1,160	)
Dividends paid		(27,607	)		(20,250	)		(10,742	)		(8,890	)
Borrowings of credit facilities		43,750			29,400			—			18,750
Repayments of credit facilities		(25,000	)		—			(34,818	)		(25,000	)
Issuance of Convertible Senior Notes		75,000			—
Cash paid for issuance costs for Convertible Senior Notes		(3,110	)
Fees paid for credit facilities and debentures		(1,061	)		(1,967	)		—			(455	)


Net cash provided by financing activities		61,978			4,180
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities								1,658			(15,589	)

Net increase (decrease) in cash								(16,041	)		7,421

Net decrease in cash		(10,705	)		(41,817	)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period		107,014			124,828			64,474			107,014


Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	96,309		$	83,011		$	48,433		$	114,435

See notes to ~~Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited).~~consolidated financial statements (audited)

HERCULES TECHNOLOGY GROWTH CAPITAL, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(unaudited)

1. Description of Business and Unaudited Interim Consolidated Financial Statements Basis of Presentation

Hercules Technology Growth Capital, Inc. (the “Company”) is a specialty finance company that provides debt and equity growth capital to technology-related companies at various stages of development, from seed and emerging growth to expansion and established stages of development, which include select publicly listed companies and select lower middle market technology companies. The Company sources its investments through its principal office located in Silicon Valley, as well as through its additional offices in Boston, ~~Massachusetts,~~MA, Boulder, ~~Colorado~~CO and McLean, ~~Virginia.~~VA. The Company was incorporated under the General Corporation Law of the State of Maryland in December 2003.

The Company is an internally managed, non-diversified closed-end investment company that has elected to be regulated as a business development company (“BDC”) under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “1940 Act”). From incorporation through December 31, 2005, the Company was taxed as a corporation under Subchapter C of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, (the “Code”). Effective January 1, 2006, the Company has elected to be treated for tax purposes as a regulated investment company, or RIC, under the Code (see Note 5).

~~The Company formed~~ Hercules Technology II, L.P. (“HT II”), ~~which was licensed on September 27, 2006,~~Hercules Technology III, LP (“HT III”), and Hercules Technology ~~III,~~IV, L.P. (“HT ~~III”~~IV”), ~~which was~~are Delaware limited partnerships that were formed in January 2005, September 2009 and December 2010, respectively. HT II and HT III were licensed ~~on May 26, 2010~~ to operate as small business investment companies (“SBICs”), under the authority of the Small Business Administration (“SBA”)., on September 27, 2006 and May 26, 2010, respectively. As SBICs, HT II and HT III are subject to a variety of regulations concerning, among other things, the size and nature of the companies in which they may invest and the structure of those investments. The Company also formed Hercules Technology SBIC Management, LLC, ~~(“HTM”),~~or HTM, a limited liability ~~company.~~company in November 2003. HTM is a ~~wholly-owned~~wholly owned subsidiary of the ~~Company. The~~ Company isand serves as the ~~sole~~ limited partner ~~of HT II~~ and ~~HT III and HTM is the~~ general partner of HT II and HT III (see Note 4).

~~In aggregate,~~ HT II and HT III hold approximately ~~$334.9~~$198.4 million and $170.3 million in assets, respectively, and accounted for approximately ~~35.5%~~19.5% and 16.7% of our total assets prior to consolidation at ~~September 30, 2011.~~March 31, 2012.

The Company also established wholly owned subsidiaries, all of which are structured as Delaware corporations and limited liability companies, to hold portfolio companies organized as limited liability companies, or LLCs (or other forms of pass-through entities). The Company currently qualifies as a RIC for federal income tax purposes, which allows the Company to avoid paying corporate income taxes on any income or gains that the Company distributes to our stockholders. The purpose of establishing these entities is to satisfy the RIC tax requirement that at least 90% of the Company’s gross income for income tax purposes is investment income.

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its subsidiaries. All inter-company accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. In accordance with Article 6 of Regulation S-X under the Securities Act of 1933 and the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, the Company does not consolidate portfolio company investments. The accompanying consolidated interim financial statements are presented in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“U.S. GAAP”) for interim financial information, and pursuant to the requirements for reporting on Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X under the Securities Act of 1933 and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Accordingly, certain disclosures accompanying annual consolidated financial statements prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP are omitted. In the opinion of management, all adjustments consisting solely of normal recurring accruals considered necessary for the fair presentation of consolidated financial statements for the interim periods have been included. The current period’s results of operations are not necessarily indicative of results that ultimately may be achieved for the year. Therefore, the interim unaudited consolidated financial statements and notes should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto for the period ended December 31, ~~2010.~~2011. The year-end consolidated ~~balance sheet~~statement of assets and liabilities data was derived from audited financial statements, but does not include all disclosures required by U.S. GAAP. Financial statements prepared on a U.S. GAAP basis require management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts and disclosures reported in the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. Such estimates and assumptions could change in the future as more information becomes known, which could impact the amounts reported and disclosed herein.

~~Certain prior period information has been reclassified to conform to the current period presentation.~~

2. Valuation of Investments

The Company’s investments are carried at fair value in accordance with the 1940 Act and Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) topic 820 Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (formerly known as SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements). At ~~September 30, 2011, 83.7%~~March 31, 2012, 91.0% of the Company’s total assets represented investments in portfolio companies that are valued at fair value by the Board of Directors. Value, as defined in Section 2(a)(41) of the 1940 Act, is (i) the market price for those securities for which a market quotation is readily available and (ii) for all other securities and assets, fair value is as determined in good faith by the Board of Directors. The Company’s debt securities are primarily invested in equity sponsored technology-related companies including life science, clean technology and select lower middle market technology companies. Given the nature of lending to these types of businesses, the Company’s investments in these portfolio companies are considered Level 3 assets under ASC 820 because there is no known or accessible market or market indexes for these investment securities to be traded or exchanged. As such, the Company values substantially all of its investments at fair value as determined in good faith pursuant to a consistent valuation policy and the Company’s Board of Directors in accordance with the provisions of ASC 820 and the 1940 Act. Due to the inherent uncertainty in determining the fair value of investments that do not have a readily available market value, the fair value of the Company’s investments determined in good faith by its Board may differ significantly from the value that would have been used had a readily available market existed for such investments, and the differences could be material.

Our Board of Directors may from time to time engage an independent valuation firm to provide the Company with valuation assistance with respect to certain of the Company’s portfolio investments on a quarterly basis. The Company intends to continue to engage an independent valuation firm to provide management with assistance regarding the Company’s determination of the fair value of selected portfolio investments each quarter unless directed by the Board of Directors to cancel such valuation services. The scope of services rendered by an independent valuation firm is at the discretion of the Board of Directors. The Company’s Board of Directors is ultimately and solely responsible for determining the fair value of the Company’s investments in good faith.

With respect to investments for which market quotations are not readily available or when such market quotations are deemed not to represent fair value, the Company’s Board of Directors has approved a multi-step valuation process each quarter, as described below:

(1) the Company’s quarterly valuation process begins with each portfolio company or investment being initially valued by the investment professionals responsible for the portfolio investment;

(2) preliminary valuation conclusions are then documented and business based assumptions are discussed with the Company’s investment committee;

(3) the valuation committee of the Board of Directors reviews the preliminary valuation of the investment committee ~~and that~~which incorporates the results of the independent valuation firm ~~and responds to the valuation recommendation of the independent valuation firm to reflect any comments, if any; and~~as appropriate;

(4) the Board of Directors discusses valuations and determines the fair value of each investment in our portfolio in good faith based on the input of, where applicable, the respective independent valuation firm and the valuation committee.

The Company adopted ASC 820 on January 1, 2008. ASC 820 establishes a framework for measuring the fair value of the assets and liabilities and outlines a fair value hierarchy which prioritizes the inputs used to measure fair value and the effect of fair value measures on earnings. ASC 820 also enhances disclosure requirements for fair value measurements based on the level within the hierarchy of the information used in the valuation. ASC 820 applies whenever other standards require (or permit) assets or liabilities to be measured at fair value but does not expand the use of fair value in any new circumstances. ASC 820 defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date.

The Company has categorized all investments recorded at fair value in accordance with ASC 820 based upon the level of judgment associated with the inputs used to measure their fair value. Hierarchical levels, defined by ASC 820 and directly related to the amount of subjectivity associated with the inputs to fair valuation of these assets and liabilities, are as follows:

Level 1—Inputs are unadjusted, quoted prices in active markets for identical assets at the measurement date. The types of assets carried at Level 1 fair value generally are equities listed in active markets.

Level 2—Inputs (other than quoted prices included in Level 1) are either directly or indirectly observable for the asset in connection with market data at the measurement date and for the extent of the instrument’s anticipated life. Fair valued assets that are generally included in this category are warrants held in a public company.

Level 3—Inputs reflect management’s best estimate of what market participants would use in pricing the asset at the measurement date. It includes prices or valuations that require inputs that are both significant to the fair value measurement and unobservable. Generally, assets carried at fair value and included in this category are the debt investments and warrants and equities held in a private company.

In accordance with ASU 2011-04, the following table provides quantitative information about the Company’s Level 3 fair value measurements of the Company’s investments as of March 31, 2012. In addition to the techniques and inputs noted in the table below, according to the Company’s valuation policy the Company may also use other valuation techniques and methodologies when determining the Company’s fair value measurements. The below table is not intended to be all-inclusive, but rather provides information on the significant Level 3 inputs as they relate to the Company’s fair value measurements.

Quantitative Information about Level 3 Fair Value Measurements of Debt Investments


Investment Type - Level Three Debt Investments	Fair Value at March 31, 2012		Valuation Techniques/ Methodologies	Unobservable Input^(a)	Range
	(in thousands)
Pharmaceuticals - Debt	$	224,765	Market Comparable Companies	Market Yield Premium/(Discount)	12.2% - 20.0% (1.0%) - 2.0%
			Option Pricing Model^(b)	Average Industry Volatility^(c) Risk Free Interest Rate Estimated Time to Exit (in months)	60.92% 0.19% 12

Medical Devices - Debt		37,250	Market Comparable Companies	Market Yield	12.8%
				Premium	0.0% - 1.3%

Technology - Debt		101,114	Market Comparable Companies	Market Yield	11.1% - 14.3%
				Premium/(Discount)	(2.5%) - 1.0%

Clean Tech - Debt		79,091	Market Comparable Companies	Market Yield	12.8% - 19.5%
				Premium	0.0% - 1.0%

Lower Middle Market - Debt		172,404	Market Comparable Companies	Market Yield	11.1% - 17.6%
				Premium	0.0% - 5.0%
			Broker Quote^(d)	Price Quotes	93.0% - 99.5% of par
			Liquidation	Investment Collateral	$88 - $545
				Other Costs	$43 - $99

Total Level Three Debt Investments	$	614,624

(a)

The significant unobservable inputs used in the fair value measurement of the Company’s debt securities are hypothetical market yields and premiums/(discounts). The hypothetical market yield is defined as the exit price of an investment in a hypothetical market to hypothetical market participants where buyers and sellers are willing participants. The premiums (discounts) relate to company specific characteristics such as underlying investment performance, security liens, and other characteristics of the investment. Significant increases (decreases) in the inputs in isolation would result in a significantly lower (higher) fair value measurement, depending on the materiality of the investment. Debt investments in the industries noted in the Company’s Schedule of Investments are included in the industries noted above as follows:

Pharmaceuticals, above, is comprised of debt investments in the Therapeutic, Specialty Pharmaceuticals, Drug Discovery and Development, Drug Delivery, Diagnostic and Biotechnology Tools industries in the Schedule of Investments.

Medical Devices, above, is comprised of debt investments in the Therapeutic, Surgical Devices, Medical Devices and Equipment and Biotechnology Tools industries in the Schedule of Investments.

Technology, above, is comprised of debt investments in the Software, Semiconductors, Internet Consumer and Business Services, Information Services, and Communications and Networking industries in the Schedule of Investments.

Lower Middle Market, above, is comprised of debt investments in the Communications and Networking, Electronics and Computer Hardware, Healthcare Services - Other, Information Services, Internet Consumer and Business Services, Media/Content/Info, and Specialty Pharmaceuticals industries in the Schedule of Investments.

Clean Tech, above, aligns with the Clean Tech industry in the Schedule of Investments.

(b)	An option pricing model valuation technique was used to derive the value of the conversion feature of convertible notes.

(c)	Represents the range of industry volatility used by market participants when pricing the investment.

(d)	A broker quote valuation technique was used to derive the fair value of loans which are part of a syndicated facility.

Quantitative Information about Level 3 Fair Value Measurements of Warrants and Equity Investments


Investment Type -	Fair Value at March 31, 2012		Valuation Techniques/ Methodologies	Unobservable Input^(a)	Range
	(in thousands)
Level Three Warrant and Equity Investments	$	67,567	Market Comparable Companies	EBITDA Multiple^(b)	3.90x - 43.23x
				Revenue Multiple^(b)	0.63x - 15.47x
				Discount for Lack of Marketability^(c)	10.3% - 25.8%

Warrant positions additionally subject to:			Option Pricing Model	Average Industry Volatility^(d)	41.54% - 60.92%
				Risk-Free Interest Rate	0.17% - 0.77%
				Estimated Time to Exit (in months)	9 - 48

Total Level Three Warrant and EquityInvestments	$	67,567

(a)

The significant unobservable inputs used in the fair value measurement of the Company’s warrant and equity-related securities are revenue and/or EBITDA multiples and discounts for lack of marketability. Additional inputs used in the Black Scholes option pricing model include industry volatility, risk free interest rate and estimated time to exit. Significant increases (decreases) in the inputs in isolation would result in a significantly higher (lower) fair value measurement, depending on the materiality of the investment. For some investments, additional consideration may be given to data from the last round of financing or merger/acquisition events near the measurement date.

(b)	Represents amounts used when the Company has determined that market participants would use such multiples when pricing the investments.

(c)	Represents amounts used when the Company has determined market participants would take into account these discounts when pricing the investments.

(d)	Represents the range of industry volatility used by market participants when pricing the investment.

Debt Investments

The Company follows the guidance set forth in ASC 820 which establishes a framework for measuring the fair value of assets and liabilities and outlines a fair value hierarchy which prioritizes the inputs used to measure fair value and the effect of fair value measures on earnings. The Company’s debt securities are primarily invested in equity sponsored ~~technology,~~technology-related companies including life science, clean technology and ~~clean~~select lower middle market technology companies. Given the nature of lending to these types of businesses, the Company’s investments in these portfolio companies are considered Level 3 assets under ASC 820 because there is no known or accessible market or market indexes for these investment securities to be traded or exchanged.

The Company applies a procedure that assumes a sale of investment in a hypothetical market to a hypothetical market participant where buyers and sellers are willing participants. The hypothetical market does not include scenarios where the underlying security was simply repaid or extinguished, but includes an exit concept. Under this process, the Company also evaluates the collateral for recoverability of the debt investments as well as applies all of its historical fair value analysis. The Company uses pricing on recently issued comparable debt securities to determine the baseline hypothetical market yields as of the measurement date. The Company considers each portfolio company’s credit rating, security liens and other characteristics of the investment to adjust the baseline yield to derive a hypothetical yield for each investment as of the measurement date. The anticipated future cash flows from each investment are then discounted at the hypothetical yield to estimate each investment’s fair value as of the measurement date.

The Company’s process includes, among other things, the underlying investment performance, the current portfolio company’s financial condition and market changing events that impact valuation, estimated remaining life, current market yield and interest rate spreads of similar securities as of the measurement date. If there is a significant deterioration of the credit quality of a debt investment, the Company may consider other factors to estimate fair value, including the proceeds that would be received in a liquidation analysis.

The Company records unrealized depreciation on investments when it believes that an investment has decreased in value, including where collection of a loan is doubtful or if under the in exchange premise when the value of a debt security was to be less than amortized cost of the investment. Conversely, where appropriate, the Company records unrealized appreciation if it believes that the underlying portfolio company has appreciated in value and, therefore, that its investment has also appreciated in value or if under the in exchange premise the value of a debt security were to be greater than amortized cost.

When originating a debt instrument, the Company generally receives warrants or other equity-related securities from the borrower. The Company determines the cost basis of the warrants or other equity-related securities received based upon their respective fair values on the date of receipt in proportion to the total fair value of the debt and warrants or other equity-related securities received. Any resulting discount on the loan from recordation of the warrant or other equity instruments is accreted into interest income over the life of the loan.

Equity-Related Securities and Warrants

Securities that are traded in the over-the-counter markets or on a stock exchange will be valued at the prevailing bid price at period end. We have a limited number of equity securities in public companies. In accordance with the 1940 Act, unrestricted publicly traded securities for which market quotations are readily available are valued at the closing market quote on the ~~valuation~~measurement date.

The Company estimates the fair value of warrants using a Black Scholes pricing model. At each reporting date, privately held warrant and ~~equity related~~equity-related securities are valued based on an analysis of various factors including, but not limited to, the portfolio company’s operating performance and financial condition and general market conditions, price to enterprise value or price to equity ratios, discounted cash flow, valuation comparisons to comparable public companies or other industry benchmarks. When an external event occurs, such as a purchase transaction, public offering, or subsequent equity sale, the pricing indicated by that external event is utilized to corroborate the Company’s valuation of the warrant and ~~equity related.~~equity-related securities. The Company periodically reviews the valuation of its portfolio companies that have not been involved in a qualifying external event to determine if the enterprise value of the portfolio company may have increased or decreased since the last valuation measurement date.

Investments measured at fair value on a recurring basis are categorized in the tables below based upon the lowest level of significant input to the valuations as of ~~September 30, 2011~~March 31, 2012 (unaudited) and as of December 31, ~~2010:~~2011. We transfer investments in and out of Level 1, 2 and 3 securities as of the beginning balance sheet date, based on changes in the use of observable and unobservable inputs utilized to perform the valuation for the period. During the three-month period ended March 31, 2012, there were no transfers in between Levels 1 or 2.


			Investments at Fair Value as of September 30, 2011
(in thousands) Description									3/31/2012		Investments at Fair Value as of March 31, 2012
(in thousands) Description	9/30/2011		Quoted Prices In Active Markets For Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)		3/31/2012		Quoted Prices In Active Markets For Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
Senior secured debt	$	513,367	$	—	$	—	$	513,367	$	614,624	$	—	$	—	$	614,624
Preferred stock		28,928		—		—		28,928		27,249		—		—		27,249
Common stock		6,864		5,889		—		975		20,613		6,962		—		13,651
Warrants		27,318		—		3,023		24,295		31,978		—		5,311		26,667

	$	576,477	$	5,889	$	3,023	$	567,565	$	694,464	$	6,962	$	5,311	$	682,191


			Investments at Fair Value as of December 31, 2010								Investments at Fair Value as of December 31, 2011
(in thousands) Description	12/31/2010		Quoted Prices In Active Markets For Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)		12/31/2011		Quoted Prices In Active Markets For Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
Senior secured debt	$	394,198	$	—	$	—	$	394,198	$	585,767	$	—	$	—	$	585,767
Subordinated debt		7,420		—		—		7,420
Preferred stock		24,607		—		—		24,607		30,289		—		—		30,289
Common stock		22,117		4,943		16,144		1,030		6,769		6,679		—		90
Warrants		23,690		—		6,289		17,401		30,045		—		3,761		26,284

	$	472,032	$	4,943	$	22,433	$	444,656	$	652,870	$	6,679	$	3,761	$	642,430

The table below presents reconciliation for all financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis, excluding accrued interest components, using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) for the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September 30, 2011~~March 31, 2012 (unaudited) and for the year ended December 31, ~~2010.~~2011.

(in thousands)
Balance,
January 1, 2011 Net Realized Gains
(losses)⁽¹⁾ Net change in
unrealized
appreciation or
depreciation⁽²⁾ Purchases   Sales   Repayments   Exit   Gross
Transfers
into
Level 3⁽³⁾ Gross
Transfers
out of
Level 3⁽³⁾ Balances,
September 30, 2011
Senior Debt
$ 394,198    $ (4,302 ) $ 3,404    $ 362,866    $ —      $ (239,299 )$ —      $ —      $ (3,500 ) $ 513,367
Subordinated Debt
7,420    —      —      —      —      (7,420 ) —      —      —      —
Preferred Stock
24,607    (941 ) 193    1,569    —      —      —      3,500    —      28,928
Common Stock
1,030    —      (55 ) —      —      —      —      —      —      975
Warrants
17,401    (978 ) 5,034    4,505    —      —      (402 ) —      (1,265 ) 24,295

Total
$ 444,656    $ (6,221 ) $ 8,576    $ 368,940    $ —      $ (246,719 ) $ (402 )    $ 3,500    $ (4,765 ) $ 567,565


(in thousands)	Balance, January 1, 2012		Net Realized Gains (losses)⁽¹⁾		Net change in unrealized appreciation or (depreciation)⁽²⁾			Purchases		Sales			Repayments			Exit		Gross Transfers into Level 3⁽³⁾		Gross Transfers out of Level 3⁽³⁾			Balances, March 31, 2012
Senior secured debt	$	585,767	$	—	$	(1,496	)	$	66,242	$	—		$	(35,533	)	$	—	$	—	$	(356	)	$	614,624
Preferred stock		30,289		2,128		(182	)		2,111		(3,628	)		—			—		356		(3,825	)		27,249
Common stock		90		—		4,003			9,558		—			—			—		—		—			13,651
Warrants		26,284		113		1,522			893		(544	)		—			—		—		(1,601	)		26,667

Total	$	642,430	$	2,241	$	3,847		$	78,804	$	(4,172	)	$	(35,533	)	$	—	$	356	$	(5,782	)	$	682,191

(in thousands)
   Balance,
January 1,
2010    Net
Realized
Gains
(losses)⁽¹⁾ Net change in
unrealized
appreciation or
depreciation⁽²⁾ Purchases,
sales,
repayments,
and exit, net Transfer in
& out of
Level 3 Balances,
December 31, 2010
Senior Debt
   $ 319,129       $ (12,835 ) $ (3,076 ) $ 98,058    $ (7,078 ) $ 394,198
Subordinated Debt
   —         —      —      7,420    —      7,420
Senior Debt-Second Lien
   6,005       —      —��    (6,005 ) —      —
Preferred Stock
   22,875       (1,250 ) (995 ) 2,603    1,374    24,607
Common Stock
   1,773       (15,037 ) (743 ) 15,037    —      1,030
Warrants
   11,076       (1,225 ) 568    8,650    (1,668 ) 17,401




Total
   $ 360,858       $ (30,347 ) $ (4,246 ) $ 125,763    $ (7,372 ) $ 444,656


(in thousands)	Balance, January 1, 2011		Net Realized Gains (losses)⁽¹⁾			Net change in unrealized appreciation or (depreciation)⁽²⁾			Purchases		Sales			Repayments			Exit			Gross Transfers into Level 3		Gross Transfers out of Level 3			Balances, December 31, 2011
Senior secured debt	$	394,198	$	(4,301	)	$	9,050		$	454,640	$	—		$	(263,432	)	$	—		$	—	$	(4,388	)	$	585,767
Subordinated debt		7,420		—			—			—		—			(7,420	)		—			—		—			—
Preferred stock		24,607		(1,441	)		838			1,860		—			—			—			4,425		—			30,289
Common stock		1,030		—			(940	)		—		—			—			—			—		—			90
Warrants		17,401		(1,054	)		5,243			6,507		(497	)		—			(51	)		—		(1,265	)		26,284

Total	$	444,656	$	(6,796	)	$	14,191		$	463,007	$	(497	)	$	(270,852	)	$	(51	)	$	4,425	$	(5,653	)	$	642,430

⁽¹⁾	Includes net realized gains (losses) recorded as realized gains or losses in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.

⁽²⁾	Included in change in net unrealized appreciation or depreciation in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.

⁽³⁾

Transfers in/out of Level 3 relate to the conversion of ~~MaxVision Holding, LLC.~~E-Band Communications, Inc. debt to equity ~~during the second quarter~~ and the respective initial public ~~offering~~offerings of ~~Pacira~~Annie’s, Inc., Cempra, Inc., Enphase Energy, Inc. and Merrimack Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

For the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2012, approximately $5.9 million and $1.6 million in unrealized appreciation was recorded for equity and warrant Level 3 investments, respectively, relating to assets still held at the reporting date. For the same period, approximately $1.5 million in unrealized depreciation was recorded for Level 3 debt investments relating to assets still held at the reporting date.

For the year ended December 31, 2011, approximately ~~$3.4~~$9.1 million and $3.8 million in unrealized appreciation was recorded for debt and warrant Level 3 investments, respectively, relating to assets still held at the reporting date. For the same period, approximately ~~$747,000~~$480,000 in unrealized depreciation was recorded for equity Level 3 investments ~~relating to assets still held at the reporting date.~~

~~For the year ended December 31, 2010, approximately $3.1 million, $3.0 million and $461,000 in unrealized depreciation was recorded for debt, equity and warrant Level 3 investments, respectively,~~ relating to assets still held at the reporting date.

As required by the 1940 Act, the Company classifies its investments by level of control. “Control ~~Investments”~~investments” are defined in the 1940 Act as investments in those companies that the Company is deemed to ~~“Control”~~“control”. Generally, under the 1940 Act, the Company is deemed to ~~“Control”~~“control” a company in which it has invested if it owns 25% or more of the voting securities of such company or has greater than 50% representation on its board. “Affiliate ~~Investments”~~investments” are investments in those companies that are ~~“Affiliated Companies”~~“affiliated companies” of the Company, as defined in the 1940 Act, which are not ~~Control Investments.~~control investments. The Company is deemed to be an ~~“Affiliate”~~“affiliate” of a company in which it has invested if it owns 5% or more but less than 25% of the voting securities of such company. ~~“Non-Control/Non-Affiliate Investments”~~“Non-control/non-affiliate investments” are investments that are neither ~~Control Investments~~control investments nor ~~Affiliate Investments.~~affiliate investments.

The following table summarizes our realized and unrealized gain and loss and changes in our unrealized appreciation and depreciation on control and affiliate investments for the three ~~and nine~~ months ~~ended September 30, 2011 and September 30, 2010:~~

(in thousands) Three months ended September 30, 2011 Nine months ended September 30, 2011
Portfolio Company Type Fair Value at
September 30,
2011 Investment
Income Unrealized
(Depreciation )
/Appreciation Realized
Gain
/(Loss) Investment
Income Unrealized
(Depreciation)
/Appreciation Reversal of
Unrealized
(Depreciation)
/Appreciation Realized
Gain/
(Loss)
MaxVision Holding, LLC.
Control $ 2,983    $ 10    $ 14    $ —      $ 861    $ (3,546 ) —      $ —
E-Band Communiations, Corp.
Non-Controlled
Affiliate —      5    (53 ) —      9    (3,425 ) —      —

Total
$ 2,983    $ 15    $ (39 ) $ —      $ 870    $ (6,971 ) $ —      $ —

(in thousands)
Three months ended September 30, 2010 Nine months ended September 30, 2010
Portfolio Company Type Fair Value at
September 30,
2011 Investment
Income Unrealized
(Depreciation)
/Appreciation Realized
Gain
/(Loss) Investment
Income Unrealized
(Depreciation)
/Appreciation Reversal of
Unrealized
(Depreciation)
/Appreciation Realized
Gain
/(Loss)
InfoLogix, Inc.
Control $ 33,935    $ 796    $ (4,266 ) $ —      $ 2,448    $ (1,419 ) $ 128    $ 2,491
E-Band Communiations, Corp.
Non-Controlled
Affiliate 2,846    —      (371 ) —      —      572    —      —

Total
$ 36,781    $ 796    $ (4,637 ) $ —      $ 2,448    $ (847 ) $ 128    $ 2,491

The Company’s investment in InfoLogix, Inc., a company that was a Control Investment as of December 31, 2010, was sold to Stanley Black & Decker (NYSE:SWK) in January 2011. Approximately $8.3 million of realized gains and $8.4 million of net change in unrealized depreciation was recognized on this control investment during the three-month period ended March 31, ~~2011.~~2012 and March 31, 2011:


(in thousands)	March 31, 2012
Portfolio Company	Type	Fair Value at March 31, 2012		Investment Income		Unrealized (Depreciation) /Appreciation			Reversal of Unrealized (Depreciation) /Appreciation		Realized Gain/ (Loss)
MaxVision Holding, LLC.	Control	$	675	$	13	$	26		$	—	$	—
E-Band Communications, Corp.	Affiliate investment		1,094		6		1,076			—		—

Total		$	1,769	$	19	$	1,102		$	—	$	—


(in thousands)	March 31, 2011
Portfolio Company	Type	Fair Value at March 31, 2011		Investment Income		Unrealized (Depreciation) /Appreciation			Reversal of Unrealized (Depreciation) /Appreciation		Realized Gain/ (Loss)
E-Band Communications, Corp.	Affiliate investment		2,032		—		(1,037	)		—		—

Total		$	2,032	$	—	$	(1,037	)	$	—	$	—

A summary of the composition of the Company’s investment portfolio as of ~~September 30, 2011~~March 31, 2012 (unaudited) and December 31, ~~2010~~2011 at fair value is shown as follows:

   September 30, 2011 December 31, 2010
(in thousands)    Investments at Fair
Value    Percentage of Total
Portfolio Investments at Fair
Value    Percentage of Total
Portfolio
Senior secured debt with warrants
   $ 414,723       71.9 % $ 357,963       75.8 %
Senior secured debt
   125,962       21.9 % 59,251       12.6 %
Preferred stock
   28,928       5.0 % 26,813       5.7 %
Subordinated Debt
   —         0.0 % 8,094       1.7 %
Common Stock
   6,864       1.2 % 19,911       4.2 %






   $ 576,477       100.0 % $ 472,032       100.0 %

   March 31, 2012 December 31, 2011
(in thousands)    Investments at Fair
Value    Percentage of Total
Portfolio Investments at Fair
Value    Percentage of Total
Portfolio
Senior secured debt with warrants
   $ 552,415       79.5 % $ 482,268       73.9 %
Senior secured debt
   94,186       13.6 % 133,544       20.4 %
Preferred stock
   27,250       3.9 % 30,181       4.6 %
Common Stock
   20,613       3.0 % 6,877       1.1 %






   $ 694,464       100.0 % $ 652,870       100.0 %

A summary of the Company’s investment portfolio, at value, by geographic location as of ~~September 30, 2011~~March 31, 2012 (unaudited) and as of December 31, ~~2010~~2011 is shown as follows:


	September 30, 2011					December 31, 2010					March 31, 2012					December 31, 2011
(in thousands)	Investments at Fair Value		Percentage of Total Portfolio			Investments at Fair Value		Percentage of Total Portfolio			Investments at Fair Value		Percentage of Total Portfolio			Investments at Fair Value		Percentage of Total Portfolio
United States	$	562,296		97.5	%	$	438,585		92.9	%	$	681,345		98.1	%	$	634,736		97.2	%
England												7,771		1.1	%		8,266		1.3	%
Iceland												5,198		0.8	%		4,970		0.7	%
Ireland												150		0.0	%		3,842		0.6	%
Canada		808		0.1	%		20,876		4.4	%		—		0.0	%		672		0.1	%
England		9,082		1.6	%		10,653		2.3	%
Ireland		3,893		0.7	%		—		0.0	%
Israel		398		0.1	%		1,918		0.4	%		—		0.0	%		384		0.1	%

	$	576,477		100.0	%	$	472,032		100.0	%	$	694,464		100.0	%	$	652,870		100.0	%

The following table shows the fair value ~~of our~~the Company’s portfolio by industry sector at ~~September 30, 2011~~March 31, 2012 (unaudited) and December 31, ~~2010:~~2011:


	September 30, 2011						December 31, 2010					March 31, 2012					December 31, 2011
(in thousands)	Investments at Fair Value			Percentage of Total Portfolio			Investments at Fair Value		Percentage of Total Portfolio			Investments at Fair Value		Percentage of Total Portfolio			Investments at Fair Value		Percentage of Total Portfolio
Drug Discovery	$	81,264			14.1	%	$	52,777		11.2	%
Drug Discovery & Development												$	137,364		19.8	%	$	131,428		20.1	%
Internet Consumer & Business Services													88,094		12.7	%		117,542		18.0	%
Clean Tech													81,938		11.8	%		64,587		9.9	%
Drug Delivery		66,734			11.6	%		35,250		7.5	%		58,006		8.4	%		62,665		9.6	%
Internet Consumer & Business Services		65,975			11.4	%		7,255		1.5	%
Specialty Pharmaceuticals		61,603			10.7	%		63,607		13.5	%
Clean Tech		59,793	��		10.4	%		25,722		5.4	%
Media/Content/Info													49,518		7.1	%		38,476		5.9	%
Software													43,788		6.3	%		27,850		4.3	%
Specialty Pharma													38,783		5.6	%		39,384		6.0	%
Healthcare Services, Other													36,605		5.3	%		—		0.0	%
Communications & Networking		56,119			9.7	%		65,098		13.8	%		33,896		4.9	%		28,618		4.4	%
Information Services		38,812			6.7	%		10,857		2.3	%		32,827		4.7	%		45,850		7.0	%
Consumer & Business Products													18,977		2.7	%		4,186		0.6	%
Therapeutic		32,562			5.7	%		25,300		5.4	%		18,479		2.7	%		35,911		5.5	%
Media/Content/Info		30,852			5.4	%		2,223		0.5	%
Medical Device & Equipment													14,190		2.0	%		—		0.0	%
Semiconductors													13,473		1.9	%		9,733		1.5	%
Surgical Devices													12,484		1.8	%		11,566		1.8	%
Biotechnology Tools		23,796			4.1	%		5,987		1.3	%		8,173		1.2	%		18,693		2.9	%
Software		22,094			3.8	%		96,508		20.4	%
Diagnostic		14,889			2.6	%		14,911		3.2	%		7,082		1.0	%		15,158		2.3	%
Surgical Devices		7,683			1.3	%		10,172		2.1	%
Semiconductors		6,916			1.2	%		3,227		0.7	%
Consumer & Business Products		4,345			0.8	%		45,316		9.6	%
Electronics & Computer Hardware		3,040			0.5	%		7,819		1.6	%		787		0.1	%		1,223		0.2	%
Energy		—			0.0	%		3		0.0	%

	$	576,477			100.0	%	$	472,032		100.0	%	$	694,464		100.0	%	$	652,870		100.0	%

During the ~~three and nine-month~~three-month periods ended ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2012 and 2011, the Company ~~made~~funded investments in debt securities, ~~including restructured loans,~~ totaling approximately ~~$146.1~~$62.9 million and ~~$351.3~~$85.5 million, respectively. During the ~~three and nine-month~~three-month periods ended ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2012 and 2011, the Company funded equity investments of approximately ~~$1.1~~$2.1 million and ~~$1.6~~$500,000 respectively.

During the three-month period ended March 31, 2012, the Company converted approximately $356,000 of debt to equity in one portfolio company. In addition, in December 2011, Hercules entered into an agreement to acquire shares of Facebook, Inc. common stock for approximately $9.6 million ~~respectively.~~ through a secondary marketplace. The investments were subject to a Facebook, Inc. right of first refusal, which expired thirty days after the date of investment. At December 31, 2011 these assets were held as Other Assets. In February 2012, Hercules was notified that Facebook Inc. had not exercised its repurchase right with respect to any of the shares and had executed all documents necessary to fully transfer the ownership of the shares to Hercules. Accordingly, during the quarter ended March 31, 2012, the investment in Facebook, Inc. was transferred from Other Assets to Investments.

During the three ~~and nine-month periods~~months ended ~~September 30, 2010,~~March 31, 2012, the Company ~~made investments in debt securities, including restructured loans, totaling~~recognized net realized gains of approximately ~~$55.7~~$2.9 million on the portfolio. We recorded approximately $2.2 million and ~~$286.0~~$1.3 million ~~respectively,~~of realized gains from the sale of equity in BARRX Medical, Inc. and ~~funded equity investments, including restructured loans,~~Aegerion Pharmaceuticals, Inc., respectively. These gains were partially offset by realized losses of approximately ~~$187,000~~$460,000 from the sale of the Company’s common stock in two public portfolio companies and ~~$18.0 million for~~due to the ~~three and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2010.~~complete write off of warrants in one private portfolio company that had a cost basis of approximately $355,000.

During the three-months ended ~~September 30, 2011, the Company recognized no realized gains or losses and for the nine-months ended September 30,~~March 31, 2011, the Company recognized net realized gains of approximately ~~$10.1~~$9.6 million from the sale of common stock in its public portfolio companies. During the three ~~and nine-months~~months ended ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2011, the Company recognized realized losses of approximately ~~$1.6 million and $6.7~~$5.2 million from equity, loan, and warrant investments in portfolio companies that have been liquidated. During the nine months ended September 30, 2010, we recognized net realized gains of approximately $3.6 million from the sale of common stock in public portfolio companies, approximately $465,000 from mergers of private portfolio companies and realized losses of approximately $19.2 million from equity and warrant investments in portfolio companies that have been liquidated. During the three months ended September 30, 2010 we recognized realized losses of approximately $18.9 million from equity and loan investments in portfolio companies that have been liquidated.

Loan origination and commitment fees received in full at the inception of a loan are deferred and amortized into fee income as an enhancement to the related loan’s yield over the contractual life of the loan. Loan exit fees to be paid at the termination of the loan are accreted into interest income over the contractual life of the loan. The Company had approximately ~~$9.8~~$3.1 million and ~~$6.6~~$4.5 million of unamortized fees at ~~September 30, 2011~~March 31, 2012 and December 31, ~~2010,~~2011, respectively, and approximately ~~$7.2~~$5.4 million and ~~$5.1~~$4.4 million in exit fees receivable at ~~September 30, 2011~~March 31, 2012 and December 31, ~~2010,~~2011, respectively.

The Company has loans in its portfolio that contain a payment-in-kind (“PIK”) provision. The PIK interest, computed at the contractual rate specified in each loan agreement, is added to the principal balance of the loan and recorded as interest income. To maintain the Company’s status as a RIC, this non-cash source of income must be paid out to stockholders in the form of dividends even though the Company has not yet collected the cash. Amounts necessary to pay these dividends may come from available cash or the liquidation of certain investments. The Company recorded approximately ~~$285,000~~$298,000 and ~~$1.4 million~~$556,000 in PIK income in the ~~three and nine-month~~three-month periods ended ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2012 and 2011, ~~respectively. The Company recorded approximately $552,000 and $1.7 million in PIK income in the same periods ended September 30, 2010,~~ respectively.

In certain investment transactions, the Company may provide advisory services. For services that are separately identifiable and external evidence exists to substantiate fair value, income is recognized as earned, which is generally when the investment transaction closes. The Company had no income from advisory services in the three ~~and nine-month periods~~month period ended ~~September 30, 2011.~~March 31, 2012.

In some cases, the Company collateralizes its investments by obtaining a first priority security interest in a portfolio company’s assets, which may include their intellectual property. In other cases, the Company may obtain a negative pledge covering a company’s intellectual property. At ~~September 30, 2011,~~March 31, 2012, approximately ~~60.9%~~65.7% of the Company’s portfolio company loans were secured by a first priority security in all of the assets of the portfolio company, ~~38.3%~~33.5% of ~~the~~portfolio company loans were to ~~porfolio~~portfolio companies that were prohibited from pledging or encumbering their intellectual property and 0.8% of portfolio company loans had an equipment only lien.

3. Fair Value of Financial Instruments

Fair value estimates are made at discrete points in time based on relevant information. These estimates may be subjective in nature and involve uncertainties and matters of significant judgment and, therefore, cannot be determined with precision. The Company believes that the carrying amounts of its financial instruments, consisting of cash and cash equivalents, receivables, accounts payable and accrued liabilities approximate the fair values of such items due to the short maturity of such instruments. The Convertible Senior Notes and the ~~SBIC~~SBA debentures as sources of liquidity remain a strategic advantage due to their flexible structure, long-term duration, and low fixed interest rates. Based on market quotations on or around ~~September 30, 2011~~March 31, 2012, the Convertible Senior Notes were trading for ~~$0.875~~$1.035 per dollar at par value. Calculated based on the net present value of payments over the term of the notes using estimated market rates for similar notes and remaining terms, the fair value of ~~its SBIC~~the SBA debentures would be approximately ~~$211.6~~$216.0 million, compared to the carrying amount of ~~$188.8~~$200.7 million as of ~~September 30, 2011.~~March 31, 2012.

The liabilities of the Company below are recorded at amortized cost and not at fair value on the balance sheet. The following table provides additional information about the level in the fair value hierarchy of our liabilities:


	3/31/2011		Liabilities at Fair Value as of March 31, 2012
(in thousands) Description	3/31/2011		Quoted Prices In Active Markets For Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
Convertible Senior Notes	$	77,625	$	—	$	77,625	$	—
SBA Debentures	$	216,000	$	—	$	—	$	216,000

See the accompanying Consolidated Schedule of Investments for the fair value of the Company’s investments. The methodology for the determination of the fair value of the Company’s investments is discussed in Note 1.

4.Borrowings

Long-term SBA Debentures

On September 27, 2006, HT II received a license to operate as a SBIC under the SBIC program and is able to borrow funds from the SBA against eligible investments and regulatory capital. Under the Small Business Investment Company Act and current SBA policy applicable to SBICs, a SBIC can have outstanding at any time SBA guaranteed debentures up to twice the amount of its regulatory capital. As of ~~September 30, 2011,~~March 31, 2012, the maximum statutory limit on the dollar amount of outstanding SBA guaranteed debentures issued by a single SBIC is $150.0 million, subject to periodic adjustments by the SBA. The Company’s net investment of $75.0 million in HT II as of ~~September 30, 2011~~March 31, 2012 fully funds the required regulatory capital for HT II. HT II has a total of ~~$125.0~~$100.7 million of SBA guaranteed debentures outstanding as of ~~September 30, 2011~~March 31, 2012 and has paid the SBA commitment fees of approximately $1.5 million. As of ~~September 30, 2011,~~March 31, 2012, the Company held investments in HT II in 8454 companies with a fair value of approximately ~~$180.8~~$188.1 million, accounting for approximately ~~31.4%~~27.1% of the Company’s total portfolio.

On May 26, 2010, HT III received a license to operate as a SBIC under the SBIC program and is able to borrow funds from the SBA against eligible investments and additional contributions to regulatory capital. With the Company’s net investment of $50.0 million in HT III as of ~~September 30, 2011,~~March 31, 2012, HT III has the capacity to issue a total of $100.0 million of SBA guaranteed debentures, subject to SBA approval, of which ~~$63.75~~$100.0 million was outstanding as of ~~September 30, 2011.~~March 31, 2012. As of ~~September 30, 2011,~~March 31, 2012, HT III has paid commitment fees of approximately ~~$750,000.~~$1.0 million. As of ~~September 30, 2011,~~March 31, 2012, the Company held investments in HT III in 2025 companies with a fair value of approximately ~~$92.4~~$129.0 million, accounting for approximately ~~16.0%~~18.6% of the Company’s total portfolio. ~~See Note 12.~~

There is no assurance that HT II or HT III will be able to draw to the maximum limit available under the SBIC program.

A smaller concern is one that has a tangible net worth not exceeding $6.0 million and has average annual fully taxed net income not exceeding $2.0 million for the two most recent fiscal years. SBA regulations also provide alternative size standard criteria to determine eligibility, which depend on the industry in which the business is engaged and are based on such factors as the number of employees and gross sales. According to SBA regulations, SBICs may make long-term loans to small businesses, invest in the equity securities of such businesses and provide them with consulting and advisory services. Through its wholly-owned subsidiaries HT II and HT III, the Company plans to provide long-term loans to qualifying small businesses, and in connection therewith, make equity investments.

HT II and HT III are periodically examined and audited by the SBA’s staff to determine their compliance with SBA regulations. If HT II or HT III fails to comply with applicable SBA regulations, the SBA could, depending on the severity of the violation, limit or prohibit HT II’s or HT III’s use of debentures, declare outstanding debentures immediately due and payable, and/or limit HT II or HT III from making new investments. In addition, HT II or HT III may also be limited in their ability to make distributions to the Company if they do not have sufficient capital in accordance with SBA regulations. Such actions by the SBA would, in turn, negatively affect the Company because HT II and III are the Company’s wholly owned subsidiaries. HT II and HT III were in compliance with the terms of the SBIC’s leverage as of ~~September 30, 2011~~March 31, 2012 as a result of having sufficient capital as defined under the SBA regulations. ~~As of September 30, 2011, HT III could draw up to $36.25 million of additional leverage from SBA.~~

The rates of borrowings under various draws from the SBA beginning in April 2007 are set semiannually in March and September and range from ~~2.88%~~2.77% to 5.73%. Interest payments on SBA debentures are payable semi-annually. There are no principal payments required on these issues prior to maturity and no prepayment penalties. Debentures under the SBA generally mature ten years after being borrowed. Based on the initial draw down date of April 2007, the initial maturity of SBA debentures will occur in April 2017. In addition, the SBA charges a fee that is set annually, depending on the Federal fiscal year the leverage commitment was delegated by the SBA, regardless of the date that the leverage was drawn by the SBIC. The annual fees related to HT II debentures that pooled on September 22, 2010 were 0.406% and 0.285%, depending upon the year in which the underlying commitment was ~~closed in.~~closed. The annual ~~fee~~fees related to HT III debentures that pooled on ~~September~~March 21, ~~2011~~2012 were 0.285% and 0.515% depending upon the year in which the underlying commitment was ~~0.285%.~~closed. The annual fees on other debentures have been set at 0.906%. The average amount of debentures outstanding for the quarter ended ~~September 30, 2011~~March 31, 2012 for HT II was approximately ~~$125.0~~$115.4 million with an average interest rate of approximately ~~5.0%~~6.0%. The average amount of debentures outstanding for the quarter ended ~~September 30, 2011~~March 31, 2012 for HT III was approximately ~~$63.75~~$100.0 million with an average interest rate of approximately ~~3.5%~~2.9%.

~~In aggregate,~~ HT II and HT III hold approximately ~~$334.9~~$198.4 million and $170.3 million in assets, respectively, and accounted for approximately ~~35.5%~~19.5% and 16.7% of ~~our~~the Company’s total assets prior to consolidation at ~~September 30, 2011.~~March 31, 2012.

In January 2011, the Company repaid $25.0 million of SBA debentures under HT II, priced at approximately 6.63%, including annual fees. In February 2011, the Company submitted a request to the SBA to borrow $25.0 million under a new capital commitment and in April 2011, the SBA approved a $25.0 million dollar commitment for HT III bringing the total available borrowings to $225.0 million, of which $125.0 million was available in HT II and $100.0 million was available in HT III.

In February 2012, the Company repaid $24.3 million of SBA debentures under HT II, priced at 6.63%, including annual fees. In April 2012, the Company submitted a request to the SBA to borrow the $24.3 million under a new capital commitment under HT III, subject to SBA approval. There can be no assurances that the SBA will approve our new capital commitment request, what the pricing will be or that we will draw on any possible commitment.

As of March 31, 2012, the maximum statutory limit on the dollar amount of combined outstanding SBA guaranteed debentures is $225.0 million, subject to periodic adjustments by the SBA. In the aggregate, at March 31, 2012 there was $200.7 million principal amount of indebtedness outstanding incurred by our SBIC subsidiaries and we intend to seek an additional $24.3 million under HT III, which will bring us to the maximum statutory limit on the dollar amount of SBA guaranteed debentures under the SBIC program.

The Company reported the following SBA debentures outstanding on its Consolidated ~~Balance Sheet~~Statement of Assets and Liabilities as of ~~September 30, 2011~~March 31, 2012 (unaudited) and December 31, ~~2010:~~2011:


(in thousands) Issuance/Pooling Date	Maturity Date	Interest Rate⁽¹⁾			September 30, 2011		December 31, 2010		Maturity Date	Interest Rate⁽¹⁾			March 31, 2012		December 31, 2011
SBA Debentures:
September 26, 2007	September 1, 2017		6.43	%	$	12,000	$	12,000	September 1, 2017		6.43	%	$	12,000	$	12,000
March 26, 2008	March 1, 2018		6.38	%	$	58,050	$	58,050	March 1, 2018		6.38	%		47,550		58,050
September 24, 2008	September 1, 2018		6.63	%	$	13,750	$	38,750	September 1, 2018		6.63	%		—		13,750
March 25, 2009	March 1, 2019		5.53	%	$	18,400	$	18,400	March 1, 2019		5.53	%		18,400		18,400
September 23, 2009	September 1, 2019		4.64	%	$	3,400	$	3,400	September 1, 2019		4.64	%		3,400		3,400
September 22, 2010	September 1, 2020		3.62	%	$	6,500	$	6,500	September 1, 2020		3.62	%		6,500		6,500
September 22, 2010	September 1, 2020		3.50	%	$	22,900	$	32,900	September 1, 2020		3.50	%		22,900		22,900
March 29, 2011	March 1, 2021		4.37	%	$	28,750	$	—	March 1, 2021		4.37	%		28,750		28,750
September 21, 2011	September 1, 2021		3.16	%	$	25,000	$	—	September 1, 2021		3.16	%		25,000		25,000
March 21, 2012									March 1, 2022		3.05	%		11,250		11,250
March 21, 2012									March 1, 2022		3.28	%		25,000		25,000

Total SBA Debentures					$	188,750	$	170,000					$	200,750	$	225,000

⁽¹⁾	Interest rate includes annual charge

At ~~September 30, 2011~~March 31, 2012 (unaudited) and December 31, ~~2010,~~2011, the Company had the following borrowing capacity and outstanding borrowings:


	September 30, 2011				December 31, 2010				March 31, 2012				December 31, 2011
	Total Available		Carrying Value⁽¹⁾		Total Available		Carrying Value⁽¹⁾
(in thousands)									Total Available		Carrying Value⁽¹⁾		Total Available		Carrying Value⁽¹⁾
Union Bank Facility	$	20,000	$	—	$	20,000	$	—	$	55,000	$	—	$	55,000	$	—
Wells Facility		75,000		—		50,000		—		75,000		—		75,000		10,187
Convertible Senior Notes⁽²⁾		75,000		70,082		—		—		75,000		70,624		75,000		70,353
SBA Debenture⁽³⁾		225,000		188,750		225,000		170,000
SBA Debentures⁽³⁾										225,000		200,750		225,000		225,000

Total	$	395,000	$	258,832	$	295,000	$	170,000	$	430,000	$	271,374	$	430,000	$	305,540

⁽¹⁾	Except for the Convertible Senior Notes (as defined below), all carrying values are the same as the principal amount outstanding.

⁽²⁾

Represents the aggregate principal amount outstanding of the Convertible Senior Notes (as defined below) less the unaccreted discount initially recorded upon issuance of the Convertible Senior Notes. The total unaccreted discount for the Convertible Senior Notes was ~~$4,918~~$4,376 at ~~September 30, 2011.~~March 31, 2012.

⁽³⁾

~~The~~In February 2012, the Company ~~has~~repaid $24.3 million of SBA debentures under HT II, priced at approximately 6.63%, including annual fees. In April 2012, we submitted a request to the ~~ability~~SBA to borrow ~~an additional $36.3~~the $24.3 million under a new capital commitment under HT III, subject to SBA ~~approval and compliance with SBIC regulations for which they have received~~approval. There can be no assurances that the SBA will approve the new capital commitment request, what the pricing will be or that we will draw on any possible commitment.

~~Wells Facility~~

On August 25, 2008, the Company, through a special purpose wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, Hercules Funding II, LLC, entered into a two-year revolving senior secured credit facility with an optional one-year extension with total commitments of $50.0 million, with Wells Fargo Capital Finance as a lender and as an arranger and administrative agent (the “Wells Facility”). The Wells Facility has the capacity to increase to $300.0 million if additional lenders are added to the syndicate. The Wells Facility expired in August 2011. Borrowings under the Wells Facility will generally bear interest at a rate per annum equal to LIBOR plus 3.25% or PRIME plus 2.0%, but not less than 5.0%. The Wells Facility is collateralized by debt investments in our portfolio companies, and includes an advance rate equal to 50% of eligible loans placed in the collateral pool. The Wells Facility generally requires payment of interest on a monthly basis. All outstanding principal is due upon maturity. The Company has paid a total of approximately $1.1 million in structuring fees in connection with the Wells Facility which has been amortized through August 2011.

The Wells Facility requires various financial and operating covenants. These covenants require the Company to maintain certain financial ratios and a minimum tangible net worth of $250.0 million, contingent upon the Company’s total commitments under all lines of credit not exceeding $250.0 million. To the extent our total commitment exceeds $250.0 million, the minimum tangible net worth covenant will increase on a pro rata basis commensurate with our net worth on a dollar for dollar basis. In addition, the tangible net worth covenant will increase by 90 cents on the dollar for every dollar of equity capital subsequently raised by the Company. The Wells Facility provides for customary events of default, including, but not limited to, payment defaults, breach of representations or covenants, bankruptcy events and change of control. The Company was in compliance with all covenants at September 30, 2011.

On June 20, 2011, we renewed the Wells Facility. Under this three-year senior secured facility, Wells Fargo Capital Finance has made commitments of $75.0 million. Borrowings under the facility will generally bear interest at a rate per annum equal to LIBOR plus 3.50%, with a floor of 5.00% and an advance rate of 50% against eligible loans. The facility will be secured by loans in the borrowing base. The Wells Facility requires various financial and operating covenants. These covenants require the Company to maintain certain financial ratios and a minimum tangible net worth in an amount, when added to outstanding Subordinated Indebtedness, that is in excess of $314.0 million plus 90% of the cumulative amount of equity raised after March 31, 2011. The Wells Facility requires the monthly payment of a non-use fee of 0.3% for each payment date on or before September 1, 2011. The monthly payment of a non-use fee thereafter shall depend on the average balance that was outstanding on a scale between 0.0% and 0.75%. From September 1, 2011 through September 30, 2011, this non-use fee was 0.75%. The facility contains an accordion feature, in which we can increase the credit line up to an aggregate of $300.0 million, funded by additional lenders and with the agreement of Wells Fargo Capital Finance and subject to other customary conditions. This new arrangement replaced the previous $300.0 million Wells Facility under which Wells Fargo Capital Finance had committed $50.0 million in capital. On June 20, 2011, we paid an additional $1.1 million in structuring fees in connection with the Wells Facility which is being amortized through August 2014. There was no outstanding debt under the Wells Facility at September 30, 2011.

~~Union Bank Facility~~

On February 10, 2010, the Company entered a $20.0 million one-year revolving senior secured credit facility with Union Bank (the “Union Bank Facility”). Borrowings under the Union Bank Facility will generally bear interest at a rate per annum equal to LIBOR plus 2.25% with a floor of 4.0%, an advance rate of 50% against eligible loans, and secured by loans in the borrowing base. The Union Bank Facility required the payment of a non-use fee of 0.25% annually. The Union Bank Facility is collateralized by debt investments in the Company’s portfolio companies, and includes an advance rate equal to 50.0% of eligible loans placed in the collateral pool. The Union Bank Facility generally requires payment of interest on a monthly basis. All outstanding principal is due upon maturity. In February 2011, the maturity date of the facility was extended from May 1, 2011 to July 31, 2011. Union Bank Facility provides for customary events of default, including, but not limited to, payment defaults, breach of representations or covenants, bankruptcy events and change of control. The Company was in compliance with all covenants at September 30, 2011.

On June 7, 2011, the Company entered into an amendment to the Union Bank Facility which extended the borrowing termination date to September 30, 2011. The amendment to the Union Bank Facility also amends the maturity date of Union Bank’s $20.0 million commitment to mean the earliest of: (a) December 31, 2011; (b) the date on which Union Bank’s obligation to make loans is terminated and the obligations are declared to be due and payable or the commitment is terminated; or (c) the date of prepayment in full by the Company. There was no outstanding debt under the Union Bank Facility at September 30, 2011.

On November 2, 2011, the Company renewed and amended the Union Bank Facility. Union Bank and RBC Capital Markets have made commitments of $30.0 million and $25.0 million, respectively. The Union Bank Facility requires various financial and operating covenants. These covenants require the Company to maintain certain financial ratios and a minimum tangible net worth in an amount, when added to outstanding Subordinated Indebtedness, that is in excess of $314.0 million plus 90% of the amount of net cash proceeds received from the sale of common stock after March 31, 2011. The Union Bank Facility will mature on November 2, 2014, approximately three years from the date of issuance, revolving through the first 24 months with a term out provision for the remaining 12 months. The Union Bank Facility requires the payment of a non-use fee of 0.50% annually. The other terms of the Union Bank Facility generally remain unchanged, including the stated interest rate. The Union Bank Facility contains an accordion feature, in which we can increase the credit line up to an aggregate of $150.0 million, funded by additional lenders and with the agreement of Union Bank and subject to other customary conditions.

~~Citibank Credit Facility~~

The Company, through Hercules Funding Trust I, an affiliated statutory trust, had a securitized credit facility (the “Citibank Credit Facility”) with Citigroup Global Markets Realty Corp. During the first quarter of 2009, the Company paid off all remaining principal and interest owed under the Citibank Credit Facility. Citigroup has an equity participation right through a warrant participation agreement on the pool of loans and warrants collateralized under the Citibank Credit Facility. Pursuant to the warrant participation agreement, the Company granted to Citigroup a 10% participation in all warrants held as collateral. However, no additional warrants were included in collateral subsequent to the facility amendment on May 2, 2007. As a result, Citigroup is entitled to 10% of the realized gains on the warrants until the realized gains paid to Citigroup pursuant to the agreement equal $3,750,000 (the “Maximum Participation Limit”). The obligations under the warrant participation agreement continue even after the Citibank Credit Facility was terminated until the Maximum Participation Limit has been reached. The value of their participation right on unrealized gains in the related equity investments was approximately $727,000 as of September 30, 2011 and is included in accrued liabilities. There can be no assurances that the unrealized appreciation of the warrants will not be higher or lower in future periods due to fluctuations in the value of the warrants. Since inception of the agreement, the Company has paid Citigroup approximately $1.1 million under the warrant participation agreement thereby reducing its realized gains by this amount. The Company will continue to pay Citigroup under the warrant participation agreement until the Maximum Participation Limit is reached or the warrants expire.

Convertible Senior Notes

In April 2011, the Company issued $75.0 million in aggregate principal amount of 6.00% convertible senior notes (the “Convertible Senior Notes”) due 2016.

The Convertible Senior Notes mature on April 15, 2016 (the “Maturity Date”), unless previously converted or repurchased in accordance with their terms. The Convertible Senior Notes bear interest at a rate of 6.00% per year payable semiannually in arrears on April 15 and October 15 of each year, commencing on October 15, 2011. The Convertible Senior Notes are the Company’s senior unsecured obligations and rank senior in right of payment to the Company’s existing and future indebtedness that is expressly subordinated in right of payment to the Convertible Senior Notes; equal in right of payment to the Company’s existing and future unsecured indebtedness that is not so subordinated; effectively junior in right of payment to any of the Company’s secured indebtedness (including unsecured indebtedness that the Company later secures) to the extent of the value of the assets securing such indebtedness; and structurally junior to all existing and future indebtedness (including trade payables) incurred by the Company’s subsidiaries, financing vehicles or similar facilities.

Prior to the close of business on the business day immediately preceding October 15, 2015, holders may convert their Convertible Senior Notes only under certain circumstances set forth in the Indenture. On or after October 15, 2015 until the close of business on the scheduled trading day immediately preceding the Maturity Date, holders may convert their Convertible Senior Notes at any time. Upon conversion, the Company will pay or deliver, as the case may be, at its election, cash, shares of its common stock or a combination of cash and shares of its common stock. The conversion rate will initially be 84.0972 shares of common stock per $1,000 principal amount of Convertible Senior Notes (equivalent to an initial conversion price of approximately $11.89 per share of common stock). The conversion rate will be subject to adjustment in some events but will not be adjusted for any accrued and unpaid interest. In addition, if certain corporate events occur prior to the Maturity Date, the conversion rate will be increased for converting holders.

The Company may not redeem the Convertible Senior Notes prior to maturity. No sinking fund is provided for the Convertible Senior Notes. In addition, if certain corporate events occur, holders of the Convertible Senior Notes may require the Company to repurchase for cash all or part of their Convertible Senior Notes at a repurchase price equal to 100% of the principal amount of the Convertible Senior Notes to be repurchased, plus accrued and unpaid interest through, but excluding, the required repurchase date.

The Convertible Senior Notes are accounted for in accordance with ASC 470-20 (previously FASB Staff Position No. APB ~~14-1,~~14- 1, “Accounting for Convertible Debt Instruments That May Be Settled in Cash upon Conversion (Including Partial Cash Settlement)”). In accounting for the Convertible Senior Notes, we estimated at the time of issuance that the values of the debt and the embedded conversion feature of the Convertible Senior Notes were approximately 92.8% and 7.2%, respectively. The original issue discount of 7.2% attributable to the conversion feature of the Convertible Senior Notes was recorded in “capital in excess of par value” in the accompanying consolidated ~~balance sheet.~~statement of assets and liabilities. As a result, the Company records interest expense comprised of both stated interest expense as well as accretion of the original issue discount. Additionally, the issuance costs associated with the Convertible Senior Notes were allocated to the debt and equity components in proportion to the allocation of the proceeds and accounted for as debt issuance costs and equity issuance costs, respectively. At the time of issuance, the debt issuance costs and equity issuance costs were approximately $2.9 million and $224,000, respectively. At the time of issuance and as of ~~September 30, 2011,~~March 31, 2012, the equity component, net of issuance costs, as recorded in the “capital in excess of par value” in the balance sheet was approximately ~~$4.9~~$5.2 million.

As of ~~September 30, 2011,~~March 31, 2012, the components of the carrying value of the Convertible Senior Notes were as follows:


(in thousands)	As of September 30, 2011			As of March 31, 2012
Principal amount of debt	$	75,000		$	75,000
Original issue discount, net of accretion		(4,918	)		(4,376	)

Carrying value of debt	$	70,082		$	70,624

For the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30, 2011,~~March 31, 2012, the components of interest expense, fees and cash paid for interest expense for the Convertible Senior Notes were as follows:


(in thousands)	Three Months Ended September 30, 2011		Nine Months Ended September 30, 2011		Three Months Ended March 31, 2012
Stated interest expense	$	1,125	$	2,062	$	1,125
Accretion of original issue discount		270		496		271
Amortization of debt issuance cost		144		264		144

Total interest expense	$	1,539	$	2,822
Total interest expense and fees					$	1,540

Cash paid for interest expense	$	—	$	—	$	—

The estimated effective interest rate of the debt component of the Convertible Senior Notes, equal to the stated interest of 6.0% plus the accretion of the original issue discount, was approximately ~~7.9%~~8.2% for the three ~~and nine~~ months ended March 31, 2012. As of March 31, 2012, we are in compliance with the terms of the indentures governing the Convertible Senior Notes.

Wells Facility

In August 2008, the Company entered into a $50.0 million two-year revolving senior secured credit facility with Wells Fargo Capital Finance (the “Wells Facility”). On June 20, 2011, the Company renewed the Wells Facility. Under this three-year senior secured facility, Wells Fargo Capital Finance has made commitments of $75.0 million. The facility contains an accordion feature, in which we can increase the credit line up to an aggregate of $300.0 million, funded by additional lenders and with the agreement of Wells Fargo Capital Finance and subject to other customary conditions. We expect to continue discussions with various other potential lenders to join the new facility; however, there can be no assurances that additional lenders will join the Wells Facility.

Borrowings under the Wells Facility will generally bear interest at a rate per annum equal to LIBOR plus 3.50%, with a floor of 5.00% and an advance rate of 50% against eligible loans. The Wells Facility is secured by loans in the borrowing base. The Wells Facility requires the monthly payment of a non-use fee of 0.3% for each payment date on or before September 1, 2011. The monthly payment of a non-use fee thereafter shall depend on the average balance that was outstanding on a scale between 0.0% and 0.75%. For the three-month period ended March 31, 2012, this non-use fee was approximately $137,000. On June 20, 2011 we paid an additional $1.1 million in structuring fees in connection with the Wells Facility which is being amortized through June 2014. In January 2012, the Company repaid the entire principal balance outstanding as of December 31, 2011 under the Wells Facility of approximately $10.2 million. At March 31, 2012, there were no borrowings outstanding under the Wells Facility.

The Wells Facility includes various financial and operating covenants applicable to us and our subsidiaries, in addition to those applicable to Hercules Funding II, LLC. These covenants require us to maintain certain financial ratios and a minimum tangible net worth in an amount, when added to outstanding subordinated indebtedness, that is in excess of $314.0 million plus 90% of the cumulative amount of equity raised after March 31, 2011. In addition, the tangible net worth covenant will increase by 90 cents on the dollar for every dollar of equity capital subsequently raised by the Company. As of March 31, 2012, the minimum tangible net worth covenant has increased to $357.2 million as a result of the January 2012 follow-on public offering of 5.0 million shares of common stock for proceeds of approximately $48.05 million. The Wells Facility provides for customary events of default, including, but not limited to, payment defaults, breach of representations or covenants, bankruptcy events and change of control. We were in compliance with all covenants at March 31, 2012.

Union Bank Facility

On February 10, 2010, the Company entered a $20.0 million one-year revolving senior secured credit facility with Union Bank (the “Union Bank Facility”). On November 2, 2011, the Company renewed and amended the Union Bank Facility and added a new lender under the Union Bank Facility. Union Bank and RBC Capital Markets have made commitments of $30.0 million and $25.0 million, respectively. The Union Bank Facility contains an accordion feature, in which we can increase the credit line up to an aggregate of $150.0 million, funded by additional lenders and with the agreement of Union Bank and subject to other customary conditions. We expect to continue discussions with various other potential lenders to join the new facility; however, there can be no assurances that additional lenders will join the Union Bank Facility.

Borrowings under the Union Bank Facility will generally bear interest at a rate per annum equal to LIBOR plus 2.25% with a floor of 4.0%. At March 31, 2012, there were no borrowings outstanding on this facility. The Union Bank Facility requires the payment of a non-use fee of 0.50% annually. For the three-month period ended March 31, 2012, this non-use fee was approximately $70,000. The Union Bank Facility is collateralized by debt investments in our portfolio companies, and includes an advance rate equal to 50.0% of eligible loans placed in the collateral pool. The Union Bank Facility generally requires payment of interest on a monthly basis. All outstanding principal is due upon maturity.

The Union Bank Facility requires various financial and operating covenants. These covenants require us to maintain certain financial ratios and a minimum tangible net worth in an amount, when added to outstanding subordinated indebtedness, that is in excess of $314.0 million plus 90% of the amount of net cash proceeds received from the sale of common stock after March 31, 2011. As of March 31, 2012, the minimum tangible net worth covenant has increased to $356.5 million as a result of the January 2012 follow-on public offering of 5.0 million shares of common stock for net proceeds of approximately $47.2 million. The Union Bank Facility will mature on November 2, 2014, approximately three years from the date of issuance, revolving through the first 24 months with a term out provision for the remaining 12 months. Union Bank Facility also provides for customary events of default, including, but not limited to, payment defaults, breach of representations or covenants, bankruptcy events and change of control. On March 30, ~~2011.~~2012 the Company entered into an amendment to the Union Bank Facility which permitted the Company to issue additional senior notes relating to our offer and sale of $43.0 million aggregate principal amount of 7.00% senior notes due 2019 (the “2019 Notes”). The offering of the 2019 Notes closed on April 17, 2012. We were in compliance with all covenants at March 31, 2012.

Citibank Credit Facility

The Company, through Hercules Funding Trust I, an affiliated statutory trust, had a securitized credit facility (the “Citibank Credit Facility”) with Citigroup Global Markets Realty Corp. which expired under normal terms. During the first quarter of 2009, the Company paid off all principal and interest owed under the Citibank Credit Facility. Citigroup has an equity participation right through a warrant participation agreement on the pool of loans and warrants collateralized under the Citibank Credit Facility. Pursuant to the warrant participation agreement, the Company granted to Citigroup a 10% participation in all warrants held as collateral. However, no additional warrants were included in collateral subsequent to the facility amendment on May 2, 2007. As a result, Citigroup is entitled to 10% of the realized gains on the warrants until the realized gains paid to Citigroup pursuant to the agreement equal $3,750,000 (the “Maximum Participation Limit”). The obligations under the warrant participation agreement continue even after the Citibank Credit Facility was terminated until the Maximum Participation Limit has been reached. The value of their participation right on unrealized gains in the related equity investments was approximately $611,000 as of March 31, 2012 and is included in accrued liabilities. There can be no assurances that the unrealized appreciation of the warrants will not be higher or lower in future periods due to fluctuations in the value of the warrants. Since inception of the agreement, the Company has paid Citigroup approximately $1.1 million under the warrant participation agreement thereby reducing its realized gains by this amount. The Company will continue to pay Citigroup under the warrant participation agreement until the Maximum Participation Limit is reached or the warrants expire. Warrants subject to the Citigroup participation agreement are set to expire between April 2012 and January 2017.

5. Income taxes

The Company has elected to be taxed as a RIC under Subchapter M of the Code and intends to continue operate so as to qualify to be taxed as a RIC under Subchapter M of the Code and, as such, will not be subject to federal income tax on the portion of taxable income and gains distributed to stockholders.

To qualify as a RIC, the Company is required to meet certain income and asset diversification tests in addition to distributing at least 90% of its investment company taxable income, as defined by the Code. The amount to be paid out as a dividend is determined by the Board of Directors each quarter and is based upon the annual earnings estimated by the management of the Company. To the extent that the Company’s earnings fall below the amount of dividends declared, however, a portion of the total amount of the Company’s dividends for the fiscal year may be deemed a return of capital for tax purposes to the Company’s stockholders.

Taxable income includes the Company’s taxable interest, dividend and fee income, as well as taxable net capital gains. Taxable income generally differs from net income for financial reporting purposes due to temporary and permanent differences in the recognition of income and expenses, and generally excludes net unrealized appreciation or depreciation, as gains or losses are not included in taxable income until they are realized.

Taxable income includes non-cash income, such as changes in accrued and reinvested interest and dividends, which includes contractual payment-in-kind interest, and the amortization of discounts and fees. Cash collections of income resulting from contractual PIK interest or the amortization of discounts and fees generally occur upon the repayment of the loans or debt securities that include such items. Non-cash taxable income is reduced by non-cash expenses, such as realized losses and depreciation and amortization expense.

During the quarter ended ~~September 30, 2011,~~March 31, 2012, the Company declared a distribution of ~~$0.22~~$0.23 per share. The determination of the tax attributes of the Company’s distributions is made annually as of the end of the Company’s fiscal year based upon its taxable income for the full year and distributions paid for the full year. As a result, a determination made on a quarterly basis may not be representative of the actual tax attributes of the Company’s distributions for a full year. If the Company had determined the tax attributes of its distributions year-to-date as of ~~September 30, 2011,~~March 31, 2012, approximately ~~97%~~98% would be from ordinary income and spill over earnings from ~~2010~~2011 and approximately 3%2% would be a return of capital. However there can be no certainty to shareholders that this determination is representative of what the tax attributes of its ~~2011~~2012 distributions to shareholders will actually be.

As a RIC, the Company will be subject to a 4% nondeductible federal excise tax on certain undistributed income unless the Company distributes in a timely manner an amount at least equal to the sum of (1) 98% of ~~our~~its ordinary income for each calendar year, (2) 98.2% of ~~our~~its capital gain net income for the 1-year period ending October 31 in that calendar year and (3) any income realized, but not distributed, in the preceding year (the “Excise Tax Avoidance Requirements”). The Company will not be subject to excise taxes on amounts on which the Company is required to pay corporate income tax (such as retained net capital gains). Depending on the level of taxable income earned in a tax year, the Company may choose to carry over taxable income in excess of current year distributions from such taxable income into the next tax year and pay a 4% excise tax on such income, as required. The maximum amount of excess taxable income that may be carried over for distribution in the next year under the Code is the total amount of dividends paid in the following year, subject to certain declaration and payment guidelines. To the extent ~~we choose~~the Company chooses to carry over taxable income into the next tax year, dividends declared and paid by us in a year may differ from taxable income for that year as such dividends may include the distribution of current year taxable income, the distribution of prior year taxable income carried over into and distributed in the current year, or returns of capital.

Taxable income for the ~~nine-month~~three-month period ended ~~September 30, 2011~~March 31, 2012 was approximately ~~$27.1~~$10.7 million or ~~$0.63~~$0.23 per share. Taxable net realized gains for the same period were ~~$8.6~~$3.2 million or approximately ~~$0.20~~$0.07 per share. Taxable income for the ~~nine-month~~three-month period ended ~~September 30, 2010~~March 31, 2011 was approximately ~~$19.3~~$8.2 million or ~~$0.55~~$0.19 per share. Taxable net realized losses for the same period were approximately ~~$17.8~~$5.8 million or approximately ~~$0.51~~$0.13 loss per share.

6. Shareholders’ Equity

On January 20, 2012, the Company raised approximately $47.7 million, net of issuance costs, in a public offering of 5,000,000 shares of its common stock.

On February 12, 2012, the Company approved the extension of the stock repurchase plan under the same terms and conditions that allows the Company to repurchase up to $35.0 million of its common stock as previously approved on February 11, 2010 and extended for six month periods ending August 26, 2010, February 26, 2011, August 26, 2011 and February 26, 2012 for an additional six month period set to expire on August 26, 2012. During the three month period ended March 31, 2012, the Company did not repurchase any common stock.

At ~~September 30, 2011,~~March 31, 2012, the Company was authorized to issue ~~100 million~~100,000,000 shares of common stock with a par value of $0.001. Each share of common stock entitles the holder to one vote.

On August 2, 2011, the Company approved the extension of the stock repurchase plan as previously approved on February 8, 2010 under the same terms and conditions that allows the Company to repurchase up to $35.0 million of its common stock set to expire on February 11, 2011 for an additional twelve month period with a new expiration date of February 26, 2012. During the nine month period ended September 30, 2011, the Company did not repurchase any common stock.

The Company has issued stock options for common stock subject to future issuance, of which ~~4,366,535~~3,549,763 and ~~4,729,849~~4,231,444 were outstanding at ~~September 30, 2011~~March 31, 2012 and December 31, ~~2010,~~2011, respectively.

7. Equity Incentive Plan

The Company and its stockholders have authorized and adopted the 2004 Equity Incentive Plan (the “2004 Plan”) for purposes of attracting and retaining the services of its executive officers and key employees. Under the 2004 Plan, the Company is authorized to issue 7,000,000 shares of common stock. On June 1, 2011, stockholders approved an increase of 1,000,000 shares, authorizing the Company to issue 8,000,000 shares of common stock under the 2004 Plan. Unless terminated earlier by the Company’s Board of Directors, the 2004 Plan will terminate on June 9, 2014, and no additional awards may be made under the 2004 Plan after that date.

The Company and its stockholders have authorized and adopted the 2006 Non-Employee Director Plan (the “2006 Plan” and, together with the 2004 Plan, the “Plans”) for purposes of attracting and retaining the services of its Board of Directors. Under the 2006 Plan, the Company is authorized to issue 1,000,000 shares of common stock. Unless terminated earlier by the Company’s Board of Directors, the 2006 Plan will terminate on May 29, 2016 and no additional awards may be made under the 2006 Plan after that date. The Company filed an exemptive relief request with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) to allow options to be issued under the 2006 Plan which was approved on October 10, 2007.

On June 21, 2007, the ~~shareholders~~stockholders approved amendments to the 2004 Plan and the 2006 Plan allowing for the grant of restricted stock. The amended Plans limit the combined maximum amount of restricted stock that may be issued under both Plans to 10% of the outstanding shares of the Company’s stock on the effective date of the Plans plus 10% of the number of shares of stock issued or delivered by ~~Hercules~~the Company during the terms of the Plans. The amendments further specify that no one person shall be granted awards of restricted stock relating to more than 25% of the shares available for issuance under the 2004 Plan. Further, the amount of voting securities that would result from the exercise of all of the Company’s outstanding warrants, options and rights, together with any restricted stock issued pursuant to the Plans, at the time of issuance shall not exceed 25% of its outstanding voting securities, except that if the amount of voting securities that would result from such exercise of all of the Company’s outstanding warrants, options and rights issued to ~~Hercules~~the Company’s directors, officers and employees, together with any restricted stock issued pursuant to the Plans, would exceed 15% of the Company’s outstanding voting securities, then the total amount of voting securities that would result from the exercise of all outstanding warrants, options and rights, together with any restricted stock issued pursuant to the Plans, at the time of issuance shall not exceed 20% of our outstanding voting securities.

In conjunction with the amendment and in accordance with the exemptive order, on June 21, 2007 the Company made an automatic grant of shares of restricted common stock to Messrs. Badavas, Chow and Woodward, the independent members of its Board of Directors, in the amounts of 1,667, 1,667 and 3,334 shares, respectively. In May 2008, the Company issued restricted shares to Messrs. Badavas and Chow in the amount of 5,000 shares each. In June 2009, the Company issued 5,000 restricted stock shares to Mr. Woodward. The shares were issued pursuant to the 2006 Plan and vest 33% on an annual basis from the date of grant and deferred compensation cost will be recognized ratably over the three year vesting period.

A summary of common stock options activity under the Company’s 2006 and 2004 Plans for the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2012 and 2011 ~~and 2010 (unaudited)~~ is as follows:


	For Nine Months Ended September 30,						For the three month period ended March 31
	2011			2010			2012			2011
	Common Stock Options			Common Stock Options			Common Stock Options			Common Stock Options
Outstanding at Beginning of Period		4,729,849			4,924,405			4,231,444			4,729,849
Granted		526,700			368,250			18,000			295,700
Exercised		(156,994	)		(413,337	)		(424,667	)		(3,542	)
Cancelled		(733,020	)		(222,923	)		(275,014	)		(7,480	)

Outstanding at End of Period		4,366,535			4,656,395			3,549,763			5,014,527

Weighted-average exercise price	$	11.39		$	11.28		$	12.14		$	11.33

Options generally vest 33% one year after the date of grant and ratably over the succeeding 24 months. All options may be exercised for a period ending seven years after the date of grant. At ~~September 30, 2011,~~March 31, 2012, options for approximately ~~3.5~~3.1 million shares were exercisable at a weighted average exercise price of approximately ~~$11.92~~$12.44 per share with a weighted average remaining contractual term of ~~2.45~~1.87 years.

The Company determined that the fair value of options granted under the 2006 and 2004 Plans during the ~~nine-month~~three-month periods ended ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2012 and 2011 ~~and 2010~~ was approximately ~~$1.2 million~~$32,000 and ~~$652,000~~$568,000 million respectively. During the three month periods ended ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2012 and 2011, approximately $104,000 and 2010, approximately $126,000 and $182,000 of share-based cost due to stock option grants was expensed, respectively. During the nine-month periods ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, approximately $480,000 and $538,000$167,000 of share-based cost due to stock option grants was expensed, respectively. As of ~~September 30, 2011,~~March 31, 2012, there was approximately ~~$1.1 million~~$672,000 of total unrecognized compensation costs related to stock options. These costs are expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of ~~2.23~~2.04 years. The fair value of options granted is based upon a Black Scholes option pricing model using the assumptions in the following table for each of the ~~nine-month~~three-month periods ended ~~September 30, 2011~~March 31, 2012 and ~~2010 (unaudited):~~2011:

   For Nine Months Ended September
   2011 2010
Expected Volatility
   46.39 % 46.39 %
Expected Dividends
   10 % 10 %
Expected term (in years)
   4.5    4.5
Risk-free rate
   0.79% - 1.98 % 1.10% - 2.51 %

   For Three Months Ended March 31,
   2012 2011
Expected Volatility
   46.70 % 46.70 %
Expected Dividends
   10 % 10 %
Expected term (in years)
   4.5    4.5
Risk-free rate
   0.61% - 1.07 % 1.65% - 2.15 %

The following table summarizes stock options outstanding and exercisable at ~~September 30, 2011 (unaudited):~~March 31, 2012.

(Dollars in thousands, except exercise price)
   Options outstanding    Options exercisable
Range of exercise prices
   Number of
shares    Weighted
average
remaining
contractual
life    Aggregate
intrinsic
value    Weighted
average
exercise
price    Number of
shares    Weighted
average
remaining
contractual
life    Aggregate
intrinsic
value    Weighted
average
exercise
price
$4.21 - $6.74
   488,559       4.46       $ 2,105       $ 4.21       323,411       $ 4.46       $ 1,393       $ 4.21
$8.49 - $12.84
   2,232,726       4.16       1       11.43       1,516,925       3.08       —         11.90
$13.00 - $15.00
   1,645,250       1.47       —         13.46       1,645,250       1.47       —         13.46
















Total
   4,366,535       3.18       $ 2,106       $ 11.39       3,485,586       $ 2.45       $ 1,393       $ 11.92


(Dollars in thousands, except exercise price)	Options outstanding								Options exercisable
Range of exercise prices	Number of shares		Weighted average remaining contractual life		Aggregate intrinsic value		Weighted average exercise price		Number of shares		Weighted average remaining contractual life		Aggregate intrinsic value		Weighted average exercise price
$4.21 - $8.49		106,567		4.43	$	637,955	$	5.09		100,984		4.3	$	623,495	$	4.91
$8.67 - $13.40		2,746,946		2.55		636,339	$	11.93		2,268,067		1.77		212,612	$	12.30
$13.87 - $14.02		696,250		1.82		—	$	14.02		696,250		1.82		—	$	14.02

$4.21 - $14.02		3,549,763		2.47	$	1,274,294	$	12.14		3,065,301		1.87	$	836,107	$	12.44

During the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2012 and 2011, ~~and 2010,~~ respectively, the Company granted approximately ~~306,600~~672,000 and ~~491,500~~296,600 shares of restricted stock pursuant to the Plans. Each restricted stock award granted in ~~2011~~2012 and ~~2010~~2011 is subject to lapse as to 25% of the award one year after the date of grant and ratably over the succeeding 36 months subject to a four year forfeiture schedule. The restricted stock awarded in 2008 vests 25% annually on the anniversary date of the award. Share based compensation cost will be recognized ratably over the four year vesting period. No restricted stock was granted pursuant to the 2004 Plan prior to 2008. The Company determined that the fair value of restricted stock granted under the 2006 and 2004 Plans during the ~~nine-month~~three-month periods ended ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2012 and 2011, ~~and 2010,~~ was approximately ~~$3.4~~$7.3 million and ~~$5.1~~$3.3 million, respectively. During the three month periods ended ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2012 and 2011, ~~and 2010,~~ the Company expensed approximately ~~$762,000~~$722,000 and $582,000 of compensation expense related to restricted stock, respectively. During the nine-month periods ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, the Company expensed approximately $2.1 million and $1.5 million$569,000 of compensation expense related to restricted stock, respectively. As of ~~September 30, 2011,~~March 31, 2012, there was approximately ~~$6.8~~$11.8 million of total unrecognized compensation costs related to restricted stock. These costs are expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of ~~2.77~~3.33 years.

The SEC, through an exemptive order granted on June 22, 2010, approved amendments to the Plans which allow participants to elect to have the Company withhold shares of the Company’s common stock to pay for the exercise price and applicable taxes with respect to an option exercise (“net issuance exercise”). The exemptive order also permits the holders of restricted stock to elect to have the Company withhold shares of Hercules stock to pay the applicable taxes due on restricted stock at the time of vesting. Each individual can make, and does not preclude the participant from electing to make, a cash payment at the time of option exercise or to pay taxes on restricted stock.

8. Earnings Per Share

~~In 2008,~~Shares used in the ~~FASB issued ASC 260,~~~~Earnings Per Share~~ ~~formerly known as FASB Staff Position (FSP) EITF 03-6-1,~~~~Determining Whether Instruments Granted in Share-Based Payment Transactions Are Participating Securities.~~~~Under this standard, unvested awards~~computation of ~~share-based payments with non-forfeitable rights to receive dividends or dividend equivalents, such as~~ the Company’s restricted stock issued under the Plans, are considered participating securities for purposes of calculating change in net assets per share. Under the two-class method a portion of net increase in net assets resulting from operations is allocated to these participating securitiesbasic and ~~therefore is excluded from the calculation of change in net assets~~diluted earnings per share ~~allocated to common stock,~~are as shown in the table below. The standard was effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008. The Company adopted this standard beginning with financial statements ended March 31, 2009. The adoption of this standard did not result in a change to the previously reported basic change in net assets per share and diluted change in net assets per share.follows:

   Three Months Ended September 30, Nine Months Ended September 30,
(in thousands, except per share data)
   2011 2010 2011 2010
Numerator

Net increase in net assets resulting from operations
   $ 6,223    $ (7,823 ) $ 29,363    $ (6,738 )
Less: Dividends declared-common and restricted shares
   (9,648 ) (7,197 ) (28,853 ) (21,582 )


Undistributed earnings
   (3,425 ) (15,020 ) 510    (28,320 )


Undistributed earnings-common shares
   (3,425 ) (15,020 ) 510    (28,320 )
Add: Dividend declared-common shares
   9,473    7,034    28,329    21,152


Numerator for basic and diluted change in net assets per common share
   $ 6,048    $ (7,986 ) $ 28,839    $ (7,168 )


Denominator

Basic weighted average common shares outstanding
   43,071    35,208    42,920    35,227
Common shares issuable
   265    —      331    —


Weighted average common shares outstanding assuming dilution
   43,336    35,208    43,251    35,227
Change in net assets per common share

Basic
   $ 0.14    $ (0.23 ) $ 0.67    $ (0.20 )
Diluted
   $ 0.14    $ (0.23 ) $ 0.67    $ (0.20 )

   Quarter Ended March 31,
(in thousands, except per share data)
   2012 2011
Numerator

Net increase in net assets resulting from operations
   $ 17,105    $ (1,178 )
Less: Dividends declared-common and restricted shares
   (11,412 ) 9,558


Undistributed earnings
   5,693    (10,736 )


Undistributed earnings-common shares
   5,693    (10,736 )
Add: Dividend declared-common shares
   11,136    9,401


Numerator for basic and diluted change in net assets per common share
   $ 16,829    $ (1,335 )


Denominator

Basic weighted average common shares outstanding
   47,018    42,737


Common shares issuable
   192    —


Weighted average common shares outstanding assuming dilution
   47,210    42,737
Change in net assets per common share

Basic
   $ 0.36    $ (0.03 )
Diluted
   $ 0.36    $ (0.03 )

The calculation of change in net assets per common share—assuming dilution, excludes all anti-dilutive shares. For the three and ~~nine-month~~three-month periods ended ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2012 and 2011, ~~and 2010,~~ the number of anti-dilutive shares, as calculated based on the weighted average closing price of the Company’s common stock for the periods, were approximately ~~2.5~~2.6 million and ~~3.9~~2.4 million shares, respectively.

9. Financial Highlights

Following is a schedule of financial highlights for the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September 30, 2011~~March 31, 2012 and ~~2010:~~2011:

HERCULES TECHNOLOGY GROWTH CAPITAL, INC.

FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS

(unaudited)

(dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)


	Nine Months Ended September 30,						Three Months Ended March 31,
	2011			2010			2012			2011
Per share data:
Net asset value at beginning of period	$	9.50		$	10.29		$	9.83		$	9.50
Net investment income		0.67			0.59			0.24			0.23
Net realized gain (loss) on investments		0.08			(0.43	)		0.06			0.10
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments		(0.07	)		(0.35	)		0.06			(0.36	)

Total from investment operations		0.68			(0.19	)		0.36			(0.03	)
Net increase/(decrease) in net assets from capital share transactions		0.04			(0.19	)		(0.21	)		(0.07	)
Distributions		(0.67	)		(0.61	)		(0.24	)		(0.22	)
Stock-based compensation expense included in investment income⁽¹⁾		0.06			0.06			(0.02	)		0.02

Net asset value at end of period	$	9.61		$	9.36		$	9.76		$	9.20


Ratios and supplemental data:
Per share market value at end of period	$	8.52		$	10.11		$	11.08		$	11.00
Total return⁽²⁾		(-12.62	%)		(-0.65	%)		19.89	%		8.33	%
Shares outstanding at end of period		43,908			36,158			49,721			43,804
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding		42,920			35,208			47,018			42,737
Net assets at end of period	$	422,050		$	338,549		$	485,447		$	403,207
Ratio of operating expense to average net assets		9.53	%		7.01	%		9.41	%		9.17	%
Ratio of net investment income before provision for income tax expense and investment gains and losses to average net assets		9.17	%		7.62	%		9.73	%		9.62	%
Average debt outstanding	$	220,664		$	223,766		$	292,832		$	164,444
Weighted average debt per common share	$	5.14		$	6.36		$	6.23		$	3.85
Portfolio turnover		4.17	%		1.72	%

⁽¹⁾

Stock option expense is a non-cash expense that has no effect on net asset value. Pursuant to ASC 718, net investment loss includes the expense associated with the granting of stock options which is offset by a corresponding increase in paid-in capital. The total return equals the change in the ending market value over the beginning of period price per share plus dividends paid per share during the period, divided by the beginning price.

⁽²⁾	The total return equals the increase or decrease of ending market value over beginning market value, plus distributions, dividend by the beginning market value, assuming dividend reinvestment prices obtained under the Company’s dividend reinvestment plan.

10. Commitments and Contingencies

In the normal course of business, the Company is party to financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk. These instruments consist primarily of unused commitments to extend credit, in the form of loans to the Company’s portfolio companies. The balance of unfunded commitments to extend credit at ~~September 30, 2011~~March 31, 2012 totaled approximately ~~$148.2~~$125.4 million. Since a portion of these commitments may expire without being drawn, unfunded commitments do not necessarily represent future cash requirements. In addition, the Company had approximately ~~$136.0~~$59.3 million of non-binding term sheets outstanding to eight new and existing companies at ~~September 30, 2011.~~March 31, 2012. Non-binding outstanding term sheets are subject to completion of the Company’s due diligence and final approval process, as well as the negotiation of definitive documentation with the prospective portfolio companies. Not all non-binding term sheets are expected to close and do not necessarily represent future cash requirements.

Certain premises are leased under agreements which expire at various dates through ~~December 2013.~~October 2018. Total rent expense amounted to approximately ~~$278,000~~$285,000 and ~~$832,000~~$276,000 during the three ~~and nine~~ month ~~periods~~period ended ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively. ~~There was approximately $268,000 and $765,000 recorded in the same periods ended September 30, 2010.~~

Future commitments under operating leases as of ~~September 30, 2011 (unaudited)~~March 31, 2012 were as follows:

   Payments due by period
(in thousands)
Contractual Obligations
   Total    Less
than 1
year    1 - 3
years    3 - 5
years    After
5
years
Operating Lease Obligations⁽¹⁾
   $ 2,488       $ 1,242       $ 1,245       $ —         $ —










Total
   $ 2,488       $ 1,242       $ 1,245       $ —         $ —


	Payments due by period
	(in thousands)
Contractual Obligations⁽¹⁾⁽²⁾	Total		Less than 1 year		1 - 3 years		3 - 5 years		After 5 years
Borrowings^{(3) (4)}	$	271,374	$	—	$	—	$	70,624	$	200,750
Operating Lease Obligations⁽⁵⁾		8,186		1,248		2,288		2,538		2,112

Total	$	279,560	$	1,248	$	2,288	$	73,162	$	202,862

⁽¹⁾	Excludes commitments to extend credit to our portfolio companies.

⁽²⁾	The Company also has a warrant participation agreement with Citigroup. See Note 4.

⁽³⁾	Includes borrowings under the SBA debentures. There were no outstanding borrowings under the Wells Facility or Union Bank Facility at March 31, 2012.

⁽⁴⁾

Except for the Convertible Senior Notes, all carrying values are the same as the principal amount outstanding. The aggregate principal amount outstanding of the Convertible Senior Notes less the unaccreted discount initially recorded upon issuance of the Convertible Senior Notes was $4,376 at March 31, 2012.

⁽⁵⁾	Long-term facility leases.

The Company and its executives and directors are covered by Directors and Officers Insurance, with the directors and officers being indemnified by the Company to the maximum extent permitted by Maryland law subject to the restrictions in the 1940 Act.

11. Recent Accounting Pronouncements

~~In January 2010, the FASB issued ASU No. 2010-06,~~~~Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures~~ (“ASU 2010-06”), which amends ASC 820 and requires additional disclosure related to recurring and nonrecurring fair value measurements with respect to transfers in and out of Levels 1 and 2 and activity in Level 3 fair value measurements. The update also clarifies existing disclosure requirements related to the level of disaggregation and disclosure about inputs and valuation techniques. ASU 2010-06 is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2009 except for disclosures related to activity in Level 3 fair value measurements which are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2010 and for interim periods within those fiscal years. The Company adopted the requirements of ASU-2010-06 in the fourth quarter of 2009 and its adoption did not have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements.

In May 2011, the FASB issuedAccounting Standards Update No. 2011-04—Fair Value Measurement: Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP and IFRSs, or ASU 2011-04. ASU 2011-04 clarifies the application of existing fair value measurement and disclosure requirements, changes the application of some requirements for measuring fair value and requires additional disclosure for fair value measurements. The highest and best use valuation premise is only applicable to non-financial assets. In addition, the disclosure requirements are expanded to include for fair value measurements categorized in Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy: (1) a quantitative disclosure of the unobservable inputs and assumptions used in the measurement; (2) a description of the valuation processes in place; and (3) a narrative description of the sensitivity of the fair value to changes in unobservable inputs and interrelationships between those inputs. ASU 2011-04 is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2011, for public ~~entities. We are evaluating~~entitiesand as such the ~~impact that our adoption of~~Company has adopted this ~~update may have~~ASU beginning with the quarter ended March 31, 2012. The Company has increased the disclosures related to Level 3 fair value measurement, in addition to other required disclosures. There were no related impacts on our financial position or results of operations.

12. Subsequent Events

Liquidity and Capital Resources

7.00% Senior Notes Due 2019

On April 17, 2012, the Company and U.S. Bank, N.A. (the “Trustee”), entered into the First Supplemental Indenture (the “First Supplemental Indenture”) to the Indenture (the “Indenture”) between the Company and the Trustee, dated April 17, 2012, relating to the Company’s issuance, offer and sale of $43.0 million aggregate principal amount of 7.00% senior notes due 2019 (the “2019 Notes”). The sale of the 2019 Notes generated net proceeds of approximately $41.7 million.

The 2019 Notes will mature on April 30, 2019 and may be redeemed in whole or in part at the Company’s option at any time or from time to time on or after April 30, 2015, upon not less than 30 days nor more than 60 days written notice by mail prior to the date fixed for redemption thereof, at a redemption price of 100% of the outstanding principal amount thereof plus accrued and unpaid interest payments otherwise payable for the then-current quarterly interest period accrued to but not including the date fixed for redemption. The 2019 Notes bear interest at a rate of 7.00% per year payable quarterly on January 30, April 30, July 30 and October 30 of each year, commencing on July 30, 2012.

The 2019 Notes will be our direct unsecured obligations and will rank: (i) pari passu with the Company’s other outstanding and future senior unsecured indebtedness, including without limitation, the Convertible Senior Notes; (ii) senior to any of the Company’s future indebtedness that expressly provides it is subordinated to the 2019 Notes; (iii) effectively subordinated to all the Company’s existing and future secured indebtedness (including indebtedness that is initially unsecured to which the Company subsequently grants security), to the extent of the value of the assets securing such indebtedness, including without limitation, borrowings under the Company’s credit facilities; (iv) structurally subordinated to all existing and future indebtedness and other obligations of any of our subsidiaries, including without limitation, the indebtedness of HT II and HT III and any borrowings under the Company’s revolving senior secured credit facilities.

The Indenture, as supplemented by the First Supplemental Indenture, contains certain covenants including covenants requiring the Company to comply with (regardless of whether it is subject to) the asset coverage requirements set forth in Section 18(a)(1)(A) as modified by Section 61(a)(1) of the 1940 Act, to comply with the restrictions on dividends, distributions and purchase of capital stock set forth in Section 18(a)(1)(B) as modified by Section 61(a)(1) of the 1940 Act, and to provide financial information to the holders of the 2019 Notes and the Trustee if the Company should no longer be subject to the reporting requirements under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. These covenants are subject to important limitations and exceptions that are described in the Indenture, as supplemented by the First Supplemental Indenture. The Indenture provides for customary events of default and further provides that the Trustee or the holders of 25% in aggregate principal amount of the outstanding 2019 Notes in a series may declare such 2019 Notes immediately due and payable upon the occurrence of any event of default after expiration of any applicable grace period.

The 2019 Notes were sold pursuant to an underwriting agreement dated April 11, 2012 among the Company and Stifel, Nicolaus & Company, Incorporated, as representative of the several underwriters named in the underwriting agreement. The Company granted the underwriters an option to purchase up to an additional $6.45 million in aggregate principal amount of the 2019 Notes to cover over-allotments, if any. The transaction closed on April 17, 2012.

Dividend Declaration

On April 30, 2012 the Board of Directors increased the quarterly dividend by $0.01, or approximately 4%, and declared a cash dividend of $0.24 per share that will be payable on May 25, 2012 to shareholders of record as of May 18, 2012. This dividend represents the Company’s twenty-seventh consecutive dividend declaration since its initial public offering, bringing the total cumulative dividend declared to date to $7.16 per share.

Portfolio Company Developments

In ~~October 2011, Hercules’~~April 2012, the Company sold its equity investment in portfolio company ~~LaboPharm,~~Annie’s, Inc. ~~was~~In connection with the sale, the Company expects to realize a net gain of approximately $2.3-$2.4 million, representing an internal rate of return of approximately 28.0% on the Company’s total investments in Annie’s, Inc.

In April 2012, the Company’s portfolio company NEXX Systems, Inc, reached a definitive agreement to be acquired by ~~Paladin Labs resulting~~Tokyo Electron. In connection with the sale, the Company expects to realize a net gain of approximately $5.2 million for the sale of its warrant and equity investments in the second quarter.

In April 2012, the Company received full repayment of ~~Hercules’ debt of approximately $12.0~~its $24.2 million term loan with Pacira Pharmaceuticals, Inc., its $5.6 million term loan with PolyMedix, Inc. and ~~the cancellation of the remaining warrants.~~

~~Company Developments~~its $8.5 million in term loan investments with other portfolio companies.

In ~~October 2011, Hercules announced~~April 2012, the ~~opening~~Company transferred the listing of its ~~new office in McLean, Virginia, thereby expanding~~common stock from the NASDAQ Global Select Market to the ~~Mid-Atlantic~~New York Stock Exchange (the “NYSE”) and ~~South-Atlantic regions.~~began trading its common stock on the NYSE on April 30, 2012 under its ticker symbol “HTGC”.

On November 2, 2011, Hercules renewed and amended the Union Bank Facility. Union Bank and RBC Capital Markets have made commitments of $30.0 million and $25.0 million, respectively. The Union Bank Facility will mature on November 2, 2014, revolving through the first 24 months with a term out provision for the remaining 12 months. The Union Bank Facility requires the payment of a non-use fee of 0.50% annually. The other terms of the Union Bank Facility generally remain unchanged, including the stated interest rate.

ITEM 2.

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Forward-Looking Statements

The matters discussed in this report, as well as in future oral and written statements by management of Hercules Technology Growth Capital, Inc., that are forward-looking statements are based on current management expectations that involve substantial risks and uncertainties which could cause actual results to differ materially from the results expressed in, or implied by, these forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements relate to future events or our future financial performance. We generally identify forward-looking statements by terminology such as “may,” “will,” “should,” “expects,” “plans,” “anticipates,” “could,” “intends,” “target,” “projects,” “contemplates,” “believes,” “estimates,” “predicts,” “potential” or “continue” or the negative of these terms or other similar words. Important assumptions include our ability to originate new investments, achieve certain margins and levels of profitability, the availability of additional capital, and the ability to maintain certain debt to asset ratios. In light of these and other uncertainties, the inclusion of a projection or forward-looking statement in this report should not be regarded as a representation by us that our plans or objectives will be achieved. The forward-looking statements contained in this report include statements as to:

our future operating results;

our business prospects and the prospects of our prospective portfolio companies;

the impact of investments that we expect to make;

the impact of a protracted decline in the liquidity of ~~the~~ credit markets on our business;

our informal relationships with third parties including in the venture capital industry;

the expected market for venture capital investments and our addressable market;

the dependence of our future success on the general economy and its impact on the industries in which we invest;

our ability to access ~~the~~ debt markets and equity markets;

the ability of our portfolio companies to achieve their objectives;

our expected financings and investments;

our regulatory structure and tax status;

our ability to operate as a ~~business development company,~~BDC, a ~~small business investment company~~SBIC and a ~~regulated investment company;~~RIC;

the adequacy of our cash resources and working capital;

the timing of cash flows, if any, from the operations of our portfolio ~~companies.~~companies;

the timing, form and amount of any dividend distributions;

the impact of ~~fluctuation of~~fluctuations in interest rates on our business;

the valuation of any investments in portfolio companies, particularly those having no liquid trading market; and

our ability to recover unrealized losses.

For a discussion of factors that could cause our actual results to differ from forward-looking statements contained in this report, please see the discussion under Item 1A—“Risk Factors” of Part II of this quarterly report on Form 10-Q as well as Item 1A—“Risk Factors” of our annual report on Form 10-K. You should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements. The forward-looking statements made in this report relate only to events as of the date on which the statements are made. We undertake no obligation to update any forward-looking statement to reflect events or circumstances occurring after the date of this report.

The following discussion should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and related notes and other financial information appearing elsewhere in this report. In addition to historical information, the following discussion and other parts of this report contain forward-looking information that involves risks and uncertainties. Our actual results could differ materially from those anticipated by such forward-looking information due to the factors discussed under Item 1A—“Risk Factors” of Part II of this quarterly report on Form 10-Q, Item 1A—“Risk Factors” of our annual report on Form 10-K, and “Forward-Looking Statements” of this Item 2.

Overview

We are a specialty finance ~~company that provides debt~~firm providing customized loans to public and ~~equity growth capital to~~private technology-related companies, ~~at various stages of development from seed and emerging growth to expansion and established stages of development, which include select publicly listed companies~~including clean technology, life science and select lower middle market technology ~~companies.~~companies at all stages of development. We primarily finance privately-held companies backed by leading venture capital and private equity firms, and also may finance certain publicly-traded companies that lack access to public capital or are sensitive to equity ownership dilution. We source our investments through our principal office located in Silicon Valley, as well as through additional offices in Boston, ~~Massachusetts,~~MA, Boulder, ~~Colorado,~~CO, and McLean, ~~Virginia.~~VA.

Our goal is to be the leading structured debt financing provider of choice for venture capital and private equity backed technology-related companies requiring sophisticated and customized financing solutions. Our strategy is to evaluate and invest in a broad range of technology-related companies including clean technology, life ~~sciences~~science and select lower middle market technology companies and to offer a full suite of growth capital products up and down the capital structure. We invest primarily in structured debt with warrants and, to a lesser extent, in senior debt and equity investments. We use the term “structured debt with warrants” to refer to any debt investment, such as a senior or subordinated secured loan, that is coupled with an equity component, including warrants, options or rights to purchase common or preferred stock. Our structured debt with warrants investments will typically be secured by some or all of the assets of the portfolio ~~company.~~companies.

Our investment objective is to maximize our portfolio total return by generating current income from our debt investments and capital appreciation from our equity-related investments. Our primary business objectives are to increase our net income, net operating income and net asset value by investing in structured debt with warrants and equity of venture capital and private equity

backed technology-related companies with attractive current yields and the potential for equity appreciation and realized gains. Our structured debt investments typically include warrants or other equity interests, giving us the potential to realize equity-like returns on a portion of our investments. Our equity ownership in our portfolio companies may represent a controlling interest. In some cases, we receive the right to make additional equity investments in our portfolio companies in connection with future equity financing rounds. Capital that we provide directly to venture capital and private equity backed technology-related companies is generally used for growth and general working capital purposes as well as in select cases for acquisitions or recapitalizations.

We are an internally managed, non-diversified closed-end investment company that has elected to be regulated as a business development company under the 1940 Act. As a business development company, we are required to comply with certain regulatory requirements. For instance, we generally have to invest at least 70% of our total assets in “qualifying assets,” including securities of private U.S. companies, cash, cash equivalents, ~~U.S. government securities~~ and high-quality debt investments that mature in one year or less.

From incorporation through December 31, 2005, we were taxed as a corporation under Subchapter C of the Internal Revenue Code, or the Code. As of January 1, 2006, we have elected to be treated for federal income tax purposes as a regulated investment company, or a RIC, under Subchapter M of the Code. Pursuant to this election, we generally will not have to pay corporate-level taxes on any income that we distribute to our stockholders. However, such an election and qualification to be treated as a RIC requires that we comply with certain requirements contained in Subchapter M of the Code. For example, a RIC must meet certain requirements, including source-of income, asset diversification and income distribution requirements. The income source requirement mandates that we receive 90% or more of our income from qualified earnings, typically referred to as “good income.” Qualified earnings may exclude such income as management fees received in connection with our SBIC or other potential outside managed funds and certain other fees.

Our portfolio is comprised of, and we anticipate that our portfolio will continue to be comprised of, investments primarily in technology-related companies at various stages of their development. Consistent with regulatory requirements, we invest primarily in United States based companies and to a lesser extent in foreign companies. Our investing emphasis has been primarily on private companies following or in connection with a subsequent institutional round of equity financing, which we refer to as expansion-stage companies and private companies in later rounds of financing and certain public companies, which we refer to as established-stage companies and select lower middle market technology companies. We have focused our investment activities in private companies following or in connection with the first institutional round of financing, which we refer to as emerging-growth companies.

Portfolio and Investment Activity

The total value of our investment portfolio was ~~$576.5~~$694.5 million at ~~September 30, 2011~~March 31, 2012 as compared to ~~$472.0~~$652.9 million at December 31, ~~2010.~~2011.

During the three month period ended March 31, 2012 we made debt and equity commitments to new and existing portfolio companies, including restructured loans, totaling $101.3 million. Debt commitments for the ~~nine-month period~~quarter ended ~~September 30, 2011~~March 31, 2012 included commitments of approximately ~~$298.3~~$42.6 million to ~~twenty-five~~six new portfolio companies and ~~$164.8~~$46.8 million to ~~fourteen~~five existing companies.Equity commitments for the quarter ended March 31, 2012 included commitments of approximately $9.6 million to one new portfolio company and $2.3 million to two existing companies.

During the three ~~and nine~~ month ~~periods~~period ended ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2011 we made debt commitments to new and existing portfolio companies, including restructured loans, totaling ~~$214.7 million and $463.1 million and funded approximately $147.2 million and $356.4 million, respectively, of debt and equity investments. During~~$97.5 million. Debt commitments for the ~~three and nine-month periods~~quarter ended ~~September 30, 2011 we made and funded equity~~March 31, 2012 included commitments of ~~$1.1~~approximately $50.0 million to ~~two existing~~three new portfolio companies and ~~$1.6~~$47.5 million to three existing companies.

During the three-month periods ended March 31, 2012 and 2011, we funded investments in debt securities, totaling approximately $62.9 million and $85.5 million, respectively. During the three-month periods ended March 31, 2012 and 2011, we funded equity investments of approximately $2.1 million and $500,000 respectively. During the three-month period ended March 31, 2012, the Company converted approximately $356,000 of debt to equity in one portfolio company. In addition, in December 2011, Hercules entered into an agreement to acquire shares of Facebook, Inc. common stock for approximately $9.6 million through a secondary marketplace. The investments were subject to a Facebook, Inc. right of first refusal, which expired thirty days after the date of investment. At ~~September 30,~~December 31, 2011 these assets were held as Other Assets. In February 2012, Hercules was notified that Facebook Inc. had not exercised its repurchase right with respect to any of the shares and had executed all documents necessary to fully transfer the ownership of the shares to Hercules. Accordingly, during the quarter ended March 31, 2012, the investment in Facebook, Inc. was transferred from Other Assets to Investments.

At March 31, 2012, we had unfunded contractual commitments of approximately ~~$148.2~~$125.4 million to ~~twenty-six~~24 new and existing companies. Approximately $40.1 million of these unfunded origination activity commitments are dependent upon the portfolio ~~companies.~~ company reaching certain milestones before the Hercules debt commitment becomes available.

These commitments will be subject to the same underwriting and ongoing portfolio maintenance as the on-balance sheet financial instruments that we hold. Since these commitments may expire without being drawn, unfunded commitments do not necessarily represent future cash requirements. In addition, we have approximately ~~$136.0~~$59.3 million of non-binding term sheets outstanding to ~~nine~~eight new and existing companies at ~~September 30, 2011.~~March 31, 2012. Non-binding outstanding term sheets are subject to completion of our due diligence and final approval process, as well as the negotiation of definitive documentation with the prospective portfolio companies. Not all non-binding term sheets are expected to close and do not necessarily represent future cash requirements.

The fair value of the loan portfolio at ~~September 30, 2011~~March 31, 2012 was approximately ~~$513.4~~$614.6 million, compared to a fair value of approximately ~~$352.0~~$396.6 million at ~~September 30, 2010.~~March 31, 2011. The fair value of the equity portfolio at ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2012 and 2011 ~~and 2010~~ was approximately ~~$35.8~~$47.9 million and ~~$39.4~~$27.0 million, respectively. The fair value of our warrant portfolio at ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2012 and 2011 ~~and 2010~~ was approximately ~~$27.3~~$32.0 million and ~~$19.0~~$21.5 million, respectively.

We receive payments in our loan portfolio based on scheduled amortization of the outstanding balances. In addition, we receive repayments of some of our loans prior to their scheduled maturity date. The frequency or volume of these repayments may fluctuate significantly from period to period. During the ~~nine-month~~three-month period ended ~~September 30, 2011,~~March 31, 2012, we received approximately $35.5 million of principal repayments, including normal principal amortization repayments of approximately ~~$51.0~~$19.0 million, and early repayments and working line of credit pay-downs of approximately ~~$172.2~~$16.5 million. During the ~~nine-month period~~quarter ended ~~September 30, 2011,~~March 31, 2012, we restructured ~~the~~our debt ~~for three~~investments in one portfolio ~~companies~~company for approximately ~~$8.1 million, $4.7~~$22.8 million and ~~$3.3 million,~~ converted ~~$3.5 million~~$356,000 of debt to ~~equity, and received approximately $23.8 million in early repayments associated with the sale of Infologix, Inc.~~equity.

Total portfolio investment activity as of ~~September 30, 2011~~March 31, 2012 (unaudited) and for the year ended December 31, ~~2010~~2011 is as follows:


(in millions)	September 30, 2011			December 31, 2010			March 31, 2012			December 31, 2011
Beginning Portfolio	$	472.0		$	374.7		$	652.9		$	472.0
Purchase of debt investments		332.3			320.4			62.9			433.4
Equity Investments		6.3			2.3			2.1			1.9
Sale of Investments		(17.5	)		(34.2	)		(4.4	)		(18.5	)
Principal payments received on investments		(54.4	)		(81.6	)		(19.0	)		(65.2	)
Early pay-offs and recoveries		(168.8	)		(114.5	)		(16.5	)		(182.1	)
Accretion of loan discounts and paid-in-kind principal		9.2			3.3			4.1			6.6
Net change in unrealized depreciation in investments		(2.6	)		1.6			2.7			4.8
Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) in Citigroup participation								0.1			(0.2	)
Conversion of Debt and Other Assets to Equity								9.6			0.2
Restructure fundings		16.1			78.4			—			16.1
Restructure payoffs		(16.1)			(78.4)			—			(16.1	)

Ending Portfolio	$	576.5		$	472.0		$	694.5		$	652.9

The following table shows the fair value of our portfolio of investments by asset ~~class:~~class as of March 31, 2012 (unaudited) and December 31, 2011 (excluding unearned income).


	September 30, 2011					December 31, 2010					March 31, 2012					December 31, 2011
(in thousands)	Investments at Fair Value		Percentage of Total Portfolio			Investments at Fair Value		Percentage of Total Portfolio			Investments at Fair Value		Percentage of Total Portfolio			Investments at Fair Value		Percentage of Total Portfolio
Senior secured debt with warrants	$	414,723		71.9	%	$	357,963		75.8	%	$	552,415		79.5	%	$	482,268		73.9	%
Senior secured debt		125,962		21.9	%		59,251		12.6	%		94,186		13.6	%		133,544		20.4	%
Preferred stock		28,928		5.0	%		26,813		5.7	%		27,250		3.9	%		30,181		4.6	%
Subordinated Debt		—		0.0	%		8,094		1.7	%
Common Stock		6,864		1.2	%		19,911		4.2	%		20,613		3.0	%		6,877		1.1	%

	$	576,477		100.0	%	$	472,032		100.0	%	$	694,464		100.0	%	$	652,870		100.0	%

A summary of our investment portfolio at value by geographic location is as follows:


	September 30, 2011					December 31, 2010					March 31, 2012					December 31, 2011
(in thousands)	Investments at Fair Value		Percentage of Total Portfolio			Investments at Fair Value		Percentage of Total Portfolio			Investments at Fair Value		Percentage of Total Portfolio			Investments at Fair Value		Percentage of Total Portfolio
United States	$	562,296		97.5	%	$	438,585		92.9	%	$	681,345		98.1	%	$	634,736		97.2	%
England												7,771		1.1	%		8,266		1.3	%
Iceland												5,198		0.8	%		4,970		0.7	%
Ireland												150		0.0	%		3,842		0.6	%
Canada		808		0.1	%		20,876		4.4	%		—		0.0	%		672		0.1	%
England		9,082		1.6	%		10,653		2.3	%
Ireland		3,893		0.7	%		—		0.0	%
Israel		398		0.1	%		1,918		0.4	%		—		0.0	%		384		0.1	%

	$	576,477		100.0	%	$	472,032		100.0	%	$	694,464		100.0	%	$	652,870		100.0	%

Our portfolio companies are primarily ~~privately-held expansion and~~privately held expansion-and established-stage companies in the ~~biotechnology,~~ drug discovery, ~~drug delivery, specialty pharmaceuticals, therapeutics, clean technology, communications and networking, consumer and business products, electronics and computers, information services,~~ internet consumer and business services, clean technology, drug delivery, media/content/info, software, specialty pharmaceuticals, healthcare services, communications and networking, information services, consumer and business products, therapeutic, medical device and equipment, semiconductors, surgical devices, ~~semiconductor~~biotechnology tools, diagnostic, and ~~software~~electronics and computer hardware industry sectors. These sectors are characterized by high margins, high growth rates, consolidation and product and market extension opportunities. Value is often vested in intangible assets and intellectual property.

The largest portfolio companies vary as new loans are recorded and loans pay off. Loan revenue, consisting of interest, fees, and recognition of gains on equity interests, can fluctuate dramatically when a loan is paid off or a related equity interest is sold. Revenue recognition in any given year can be highly concentrated among several portfolio companies. As of both March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, our ten largest portfolio companies represented approximately 37.9% of the total fair value of our investments in portfolio companies. At both March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, we had seven investments that represented 5% or more of our net assets. At March 31, 2012, we had four equity investments representing approximately 59.2% of the total fair value of our equity investments, and each represented 5% or more of the total fair value of our equity investments. At December 31, 2011, we had three equity investments which represented approximately 48.0 % of the total fair value of our equity investments, and each represented 5% or more of the total fair value of such investments.

As of ~~September 30, 2011,~~March 31, 2012, approximately 52.7% of the fair value of our portfolio was composed of investments in four industries: 19.8% was composed of investments in the drug discovery and development industry, 12.7% was composed of investments in the internet consumer and business services industry; 11.8% was composed of investments in the clean technology industry and 8.4% was composed of investments in the drug delivery industry.

As of March 31, 2012, over ~~99.2%~~99% of our debt investments were in a senior secured first lien position, and more than 91.1% of the debt investment portfolio was priced at floating interest rates or floating interest rates with a Prime or LIBOR based interest rate floor. Our investments in senior secured debt with warrants have equity enhancement features, typically in the form of warrants or other equity-related securities designed to provide us with an opportunity for capital appreciation. Our warrant coverage generally ranges from 3% to 20% of the principal amount invested in a portfolio company, with a strike price equal to the most recent equity financing ~~round.~~round at the time of issuance. As of ~~September 30, 2011,~~March 31, 2012, we held warrants in ~~104~~110 portfolio companies, with a fair value of approximately ~~$27.3~~$32.0 million. The fair value of the warrant portfolio has increased by approximately 6.4% as compared to the fair value of $30.0 million at December 31, 2011. These warrant holdings would require us to invest approximately ~~$70.7~~$72.4 million to exercise such warrants.

Warrants may appreciate or depreciate in value depending largely upon the underlying portfolio company’s performance and overall market conditions. Of the warrants which have monetized since inception, we have realized warrant gain multiples in the range of approximately 1.04x to 8.74x based on the historical rate of return on our investments. However, ~~these~~our current warrants may not appreciate in value and, in fact, may decline in value. Accordingly, we may not be able to realize gains from our warrant interests. The value of our senior secured debt (without warrants) at ~~September 30, 2011~~March 31, 2012 was approximately ~~$126.0~~$94.2 million compared to approximately ~~$59.3~~$133.5 million at December 31, ~~2010.~~2011. The increase in 2011 was primarily attributable to two new investments in lower middle market technology companies, ~~in the nine month period ended September 30, 2011,~~ which typically do not have equity enhancement features.

As required by the 1940 Act, ~~the Company classifies its~~we classify our investments by level of control. “Control ~~Investments”~~investments” are defined in the 1940 Act as investments in those companies that ~~the Company is~~we are deemed to ~~“Control”.~~“control.” Generally, under the 1940 Act, ~~the Company is~~we are deemed to ~~“Control”~~“control” a company in which ~~it has~~we have invested if ~~it owns~~we own 25% or more of the voting securities of such company or ~~has~~have greater than 50% representation on its board. “Affiliate ~~Investments”~~investments” are investments in those companies that are ~~“Affiliated Companies”~~“affiliated companies” of ~~the Company,~~us, as defined in the 1940 Act, which are not ~~Control Investments. The Company is~~control investments. We are deemed to be an ~~“Affiliate”~~“affiliate” of a company in which ~~it has~~we have invested if ~~it owns~~we own 5% or more but less than 25% of the voting securities of such company. ~~“Non-Control/Non-Affiliate Investments”~~“Non-control/ non-affiliate investments” are investments that are neither ~~Control Investments~~control investments nor ~~Affiliate Investments.~~affiliate investments.

(in thousands) Three months ended September 30, 2011 Nine months ended September 30, 2011
Portfolio Company Type Fair Value at
September 30,
2011 Investment
Income Unrealized
(Depreciation )
/Appreciation Realized
Gain
/(Loss) Investment
Income Unrealized
(Depreciation)
/Appreciation Reversal of
Unrealized
(Depreciation)
/Appreciation Realized
Gain/
(Loss)
MaxVision Holding, LLC.
Control $ 2,983    $ 10    $ 14    $ —      $ 861    $ (3,546 ) —      $ —
E-Band Communiations, Corp.
Non-Controlled
Affiliate —      5    (53 ) —      9    (3,425 ) —      —

Total
$ 2,983    $ 15    $ (39 ) $ —      $ 870    $ (6,971 ) $ —      $ —

(in thousands)
Three months ended September 30, 2010 Nine months ended September 30, 2010
Portfolio Company Type Fair Value at
September 30,
2011 Investment
Income Unrealized
(Depreciation)
/Appreciation Realized
Gain
/(Loss) Investment
Income Unrealized
(Depreciation)
/Appreciation Reversal of
Unrealized
(Depreciation)
/Appreciation Realized
Gain
/(Loss)
InfoLogix, Inc.
Control $ 33,935    $ 796    $ (4,266 ) $ —      $ 2,488    $ (1,419 ) $ 128    $ 2,500
E-Band Communiations, Corp.
Non-Controlled
Affiliate 2,846    —      (371 ) —      —      572    —      —

Total
$ 36,781    $ 796    $ (4,637 ) $ —      $ 2,488    $ (847 ) $ 128    $ 2,500


(in thousands)	March 31, 2012
Portfolio Company	Type	Fair Value at March 31, 2012		Investment Income		Unrealized (Depreciation) /Appreciation			Reversal of Unrealized (Depreciation) /Appreciation		Realized Gain/ (Loss)
MaxVision Holding, LLC.	Control	$	675	$	13	$	26		$	—	$	—
E-Band Communications, Corp.	Affiliate investment		1,094		6		1,076			—		—

Total		$	1,769	$	19	$	1,102		$	—	$	—


(in thousands)	March 31, 2011
Portfolio Company	Type	Fair Value at March 31, 2011		Investment Income		Unrealized (Depreciation) /Appreciation			Reversal of Unrealized (Depreciation) /Appreciation		Realized Gain/ (Loss)
E-Band Communications, Corp.	Affiliate investment	$	2,032	$	—	$	(1,037	)	$	—	$	—

Total		$	2,032	$	—	$	(1,037	)	$	—	$	—

The following table shows the fair value of our portfolio by industry sector at ~~September 30, 2011~~March 31, 2012 (unaudited) and December 31, ~~2010:~~2011:


	September 30, 2011					December 31, 2010					March 31, 2012					December 31, 2011
(in thousands)	Investments at Fair Value		Percentage of Total Portfolio			Investments at Fair Value		Percentage of Total Portfolio			Investments at Fair Value		Percentage of Total Portfolio			Investments at Fair Value		Percentage of Total Portfolio
Drug Discovery	$	81,264		14.1	%	$	52,777		11.2	%
Drug Discovery & Development											$	137,364		19.8	%	$	131,428		20.1	%
Internet Consumer & Business Services												88,094		12.7	%		117,542		18.0	%
Clean Tech												81,938		11.8	%		64,587		9.9	%
Drug Delivery		66,734		11.6	%		35,250		7.5	%		58,006		8.4	%		62,665		9.6	%
Internet Consumer & Business Services		65,975		11.4	%		7,255		1.5	%
Specialty Phamaceuticals		61,603		10.7	%		63,607		13.5	%
Clean Tech		59,793		10.4	%		25,722		5.4	%
Media/Content/Info												49,518		7.1	%		38,476		5.9	%
Software												43,788		6.3	%		27,850		4.3	%
Specialty Pharma												38,783		5.6	%		39,384		6.0	%
Healthcare Services, Other												36,605		5.3	%		—		0.0	%
Communications & Networking		56,119		9.7	%		65,098		13.8	%		33,896		4.9	%		28,618		4.4	%
Information Services		38,812		6.7	%		10,857		2.3	%		32,827		4.7	%		45,850		7.0	%
Consumer & Business Products												18,977		2.7	%		4,186		0.6	%
Therapeutic		32,562		5.7	%		25,300		5.4	%		18,479		2.7	%		35,911		5.5	%
Media/Content/Info		30,852		5.4	%		2,223		0.5	%
Medical Device & Equipment												14,190		2.0	%		—		0.0	%
Semiconductors												13,473		1.9	%		9,733		1.5	%
Surgical Devices												12,484		1.8	%		11,566		1.8	%
Biotechnology Tools		23,796		4.1	%		5,987		1.3	%		8,173		1.2	%		18,693		2.9	%
Software		22,094		3.8	%		96,508		20.4	%
Diagnostic		14,889		2.6	%		14,911		3.2	%		7,082		1.0	%		15,158		2.3	%
Surgical Devices		7,683		1.3	%		10,172		2.1	%
Semiconductors		6,916		1.2	%		3,227		0.7	%
Consumer & Business Products		4,345		0.8	%		45,316		9.6	%
Electronics & Computer Hardware		3,040		0.5	%		7,819		1.6	%		787		0.1	%		1,223		0.2	%
Energy		—		0.0	%		3		0.0	%

	$	576,477		100.0	%	$	472,032		100.0	%	$	694,464		100.0	%	$	652,870		100.0	%

During the three months ended March 31, 2012, we recognized net realized gains of approximately $2.9 million on the portfolio. We recorded approximately $2.2 million and $1.3 million of realized gains from the sale of equity in BARRX Medical, Inc. and Aegerion Pharmaceuticals, Inc., respectively. These gains were partially offset by realized losses of approximately $460,000 from the sale of our common stock in two public portfolio companies and due to the complete write off of warrants in one private portfolio company that had a cost basis of approximately $355,000.

During the three-months ended March 31, 2011, we recognized net realized gains of approximately $9.6 million from the sale of common stock in our public portfolio companies. During the three months ended March 31, 2011, we recognized realized losses of approximately $5.2 million from equity, loan, and warrant investments in portfolio companies that have been liquidated.

We use an investment grading system, which grades each debt investment on a scale of 1 to 5, to characterize and monitor our expected level of risk on the debt investments in our portfolio with 1 being the highest quality. The following table shows the distribution of our outstanding debt investments on the 1 to 5 investment grading scale at fair value as of ~~September 30, 2011~~March 31, 2012 (unaudited) and December 31, ~~2010.~~2011, respectively.


	September 30, 2011					December 31, 2010					March 31, 2012					December 31, 2011
(in thousands)	Investments at Fair Value		Percentage of Total Portfolio			Investments at Fair Value		Percentage of Total Portfolio			Investments at Fair Value		Percentage of Total Portfolio			Investments at Fair Value		Percentage of Total Portfolio
Investment Grading
1	$	108,038		21.0	%	$	65,345		16.3	%	$	124,786		20.3	%	$	104,516		17.8	%
2		368,878		71.9	%		232,713		57.9	%		349,858		56.9	%		403,114		68.8	%
3		24,866		4.8	%		90,739		22.6	%		129,211		21.0	%		70,388		12.0	%
4		8,602		1.7	%		8,777		2.2	%		10,094		1.7	%		6,722		1.2	%
5		2,983		0.6	%		4,045		1.0	%		675		0.1	%		1,027		0.2	%

	$	513,367		100.0	%	$	401,619		100.0	%	$	614,624		100.0	%	$	585,767		100.0	%

As of ~~September 30, 2011,~~March 31, 2012, our investments had a weighted average investment grading of ~~1.96~~2.08 as compared to ~~2.21~~2.01 at December 31, ~~2010.~~2011. The ~~improvement~~downgrade in investment grading is primarily attributable to ~~one new investment rated 1 and the improvements~~seven companies being downgraded from ~~rated~~a 2 to ~~rated 1 of two investments, approximately 27 new investments~~a 3 and one company being downgraded from a 3 to ~~the portfolio rated~~a 4, partially offset by one company upgraded from a 3 to a 2 and ~~the improvement from level 3 to level 2~~a complete payoff of ~~four investments.~~a rated 4 company as of March 31, 2012. Our policy is to lower the grading on our portfolio companies as they approach the point in time when they will require additional equity capital. Additionally, we may downgrade our portfolio companies if they are not meeting our financing criteria and their respective business plans. Various companies in our portfolio will require additional funding in the near term or have not met their business plans and have therefore been downgraded until their funding is complete or their operations improve. At ~~September 30, 2011, four~~March 31, 2012, 43 portfolio companies that were graded 2, 17 portfolio companies were graded 3, ~~three~~two portfolio companies were graded 4, and ~~two~~one portfolio ~~companies were~~company was graded 5 as compared to ~~eight~~43 portfolio companies that were graded 2, 12 portfolio companies that were graded 3, two portfolio companies that were ~~graded~~grade 4, and two portfolio companies that were graded 5 at December 31, ~~2010.~~2011.

At ~~September 30, 2011,~~March 31, 2012, there was one portfolio company on non-accrual status with a fair value of ~~zero.~~$675,000. There ~~were two loans~~was one portfolio company on non-accrual status as of December 31, ~~2010~~2011 with a fair value of approximately ~~$4.0 million. During the three months ended March 31, 2011 we wrote off our warrant, equity and debt investments in one of these portfolio companies for a realized loss of approximately $5.2~~$1.0 million.

The effective yield on our debt investments for the ~~nine~~three month periods ended ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2012 and 2011 was 14.6% and ~~2010 was 17.8% and 16.2%~~18.1%, respectively. This yield was ~~higher~~lower period over period due to ~~unearned income~~fewer fee accelerations attributed to early ~~payoffs.~~payoffs and one-time events during the current quarter as compared to the prior year. The effective yield excluding payoffs on our debt investments for the ~~nine~~three month periods ended ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2012 and 2011 was 13.7% and ~~2010 excluding payoffs was 11.5% and 11.3%~~15.9%, respectively. The decline in rate is due primarily to the repayments of higher yielding investments over the course of the year which existed during the prior period.

The overall weighted average yield to maturity of our loan ~~obligations~~investments was approximately ~~13.0%~~13.4% and ~~13.9%~~12.6% at ~~September 30, 2011~~March 31, 2012 and December 31, ~~2010.~~2011. The weighted average yield to maturity is computed using the interest rates in effect at the inception of each of the loans, and includes amortization of the loan facility fees, commitment fees and market premiums or discounts over the expected life of the debt investments, weighted by their respective costs when averaged and based on the assumption that all contractual loan commitments have been fully funded and held to maturity.

We generate revenue in the form of interest income, primarily from our investments in debt securities, and commitment and facility fees. Fees generated in connection with our debt investments are recognized over the life of the loan or, in some cases, recognized as earned. In addition, we generate revenue in the form of capital gains, if any, on warrants or other equity-related securities that we acquire from our portfolio companies. Our investments generally range from $1.0 million to $25.0 million. Our debt investments have a term of between two and seven years and typically bear interest at a rate ranging from ~~PRIME~~Prime to ~~14%~~approximately 14.0 % as of ~~September 30, 2011.~~March 31, 2012. In addition to the cash yields received on our loans, in some instances, our loans may also include any of the following: end-of-term payments, exit fees, balloon payment fees, commitment fees, success fees, PIK provisions or prepayment ~~fees, and diligence~~ fees which may be required to be included in income prior to receipt.

Loan origination and commitment fees received in full at the inception of a loan are deferred and amortized into fee income as an enhancement to the related loan’s yield over the contractual life of the loan. We recognize nonrecurring fees amortized over the remaining term of the loan commencing in the quarter relating to specific loan modifications. Loan exit fees to be paid at the termination of the loan are accreted into interest income over the contractual life of the loan. We had approximately ~~$9.8~~$3.1 million and ~~$6.6~~$4.5 million of

unamortized fees at ~~September 30, 2011~~March 31, 2012 and December 31, ~~2010,~~2011, respectively, and approximately ~~$7.2~~$5.4 million and ~~$5.1~~$4.4 million in exit fees receivable at ~~September 30, 2011~~March 31, 2012 and December 31, ~~2010,~~2011, respectively. We recognize nonrecurring fees amortized over the remaining term of the loan relating to specific loan modifications. Certain fees may still be recognized as one-time fees, including prepayment penalties, fees related to select covenant default waiver fees and acceleration of previously deferred loan fees and original issue discount (“OID”) related to early loan pay-off or material modification of the specific debt outstanding.

We have loans in our portfolio that contain a PIK provision. The PIK interest, computed at the contractual rate specified in each loan agreement, is added to the principal balance of the loan and recorded as interest income. To maintain our status as a RIC, this non-cash source of income must be paid out to stockholders in the form of dividends even though we have not yet collected the cash. Amounts necessary to pay these dividends may come from available cash or the liquidation of certain investments. We recorded approximately ~~$1.4 million~~$298,000 and ~~$1.7 million~~$556,000 in PIK income in the ~~nine~~three month periods ended ~~September 30, 2011~~March 31, 2012 and ~~2010.~~2011. In certain investment transactions, we may provide advisory services. For services that are separately identifiable and external evidence exists to substantiate fair value, income is recognized as earned, which is generally when the investment transaction closes. We had no income from advisory services in the three month period ended March 31, 2012.

In some cases, ~~the Company collateralizes its~~we collateralize our investments by obtaining a first priority security interest in a portfolio company’s assets, which may include their intellectual property. In other cases, ~~the Company~~we may obtain a negative pledge covering a company’s intellectual property.

At ~~September 30, 2011,~~March 31, 2012, approximately ~~60.9%~~65.7% of our portfolio company loans were secured by a first priority security in all of the assets of the portfolio company, ~~38.3%~~33.5% of the loans were to portfolio companies that were prohibited from pledging or encumbering their intellectual property and 0.8% of portfolio company loans had an equipment only lien.

Interest on debt securities is generally payable monthly, with amortization of principal typically occurring over the term of the security for emerging-growth, expansion-stage and established-stage companies. In addition, certain loans may include an interest-only period ranging from three to eighteen months for emerging-growth and expansion-stage companies and longer for established-stage companies. In limited instances in which we choose to defer amortization of the loan for a period of time from the date of the initial investment, the principal amount of the debt securities and any accrued but unpaid interest become due at the maturity date.

Results of Operations

Comparison of the three ~~and nine-month~~month periods ended ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2012 and 2011 ~~and 2010~~

Investment Income

Total investment income in the first quarter of 2012 was approximately $22.4 million compared to approximately $19.2 million in the first quarter of 2011. Interest income ~~totaled approximately $16.4 and $50.9 million~~ for the three ~~and nine-month~~month periods ended ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2012 and 2011, ~~compared to $14.1 and $38.1 million for the three and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2010. Income from commitment, facility and loan related fees~~ totaled approximately ~~$2.3~~$20.3 million and ~~$7.7~~$16.5 million, ~~for the three and nine-month period ended September 30, 2011, compared with $1.5 and $4.5 million for the same periods ended September 30, 2010,~~ respectively. The increase in interest income is attributable to ~~a higher average~~an increase of loan interest ~~earning investment portfolio~~income and back end interest income ~~from early repayments.~~of approximately $3.2 million and $1.3 million, partially offset by decreases in default interest income and PIK interest income of approximately $324,000 and $258,000, respectively. Income from commitment, facility and loan related fees ~~are~~for the three month periods ended March 31, 2012 and 2011, totaled approximately $2.1 million and $2.7 million, respectively. The decrease in income from commitment, facility and loan related fees is primarily the result of a decrease in one time fees of approximately $585,000 and a decrease in amendment revenue of approximately $384,000 partially offset by an increase in ~~facilities~~facility fees of approximately ~~$1.4 million during the period ended September 30, 2011 compared to the same period ended September 30, 2010.~~$220,000.

~~PIK Income~~

The following table shows the PIK-related activity for the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2012 and 2011, ~~and 2010,~~at ~~cost~~:cost:


	Nine months ended September 30,						Three Months Ended March 31,
(in thousands)	2011			2010			2012		2011
Beginning PIK loan balance	$	3,955		$	2,315		$	2,041	$	3,955
PIK interest capitalized during the period		1,801			2,366			280		909
Payments received from PIK loans		(3,567	)		(1,087	)		—		(1,733	)
PIK converted to other securities		(440	)		—
Realized Loss		—			(327	)

Ending PIK loan balance	$	1,749		$	3,267		$	2,321	$	3,131

The ~~increase~~decrease in payments received from PIK loans during the ~~nine~~three months ~~September 30, 2011 includes~~March 31, 2012 is due to $1.5 million of PIK collected in conjunction with the sale of our investment in Infologix, Inc. in the first quarter of 2011.

In certain investment transactions, we may provide advisory services. For services that are separately identifiable and external evidence exists to substantiate fair value, income is recognized as earned, which is generally when the investment transaction closes. We had no income from advisory services in the three month period ended March 31, 2012.

Operating Expenses

Operating expenses, which are comprised of interest and fees, general and administrative and employee compensation, totaled approximately ~~$10.1~~$11.0 million and ~~$7.5~~$9.3 million during the three month periods ended ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2012 and 2011, ~~and 2010, respectively. Operating expenses totaled approximately $29.9 million and $22.0 million during the nine month periods ended September 30, 2011 and 2010,~~ respectively.

Interest and fees totaled approximately ~~$4.3~~$5.0 million and ~~approximately $11.3~~$3.2 million during the ~~three and nine month~~three-month periods ended ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2012 and 2011, ~~respectively, and approximately $2.5 million and $7.2 million during the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2010.~~respectively. The increase is primarily attributed to $1.3 ~~million and $2.3~~ million of interest and fee expenses during the three ~~and nine~~ month ~~periods~~period ended ~~September 30, 2011,~~March 31, 2012, respectively, related to the $75.0 million of Convertible Senior Notes issued on April 15, 2011. Additionally, ~~the Company~~we incurred approximately $271,000 ~~and $496,000~~ of non cash interest expense during the three ~~and nine~~ month ~~periods~~period ended ~~September 30, 2011, respectively,~~March 31, 2012 attributed to the accretion of the fair value of the conversion feature on the Convertible Senior Notes. ~~The Company~~Additionally, we recognized an acceleration of approximately $457,000 of unamortized fees in connection with the pay down of $24.3 million SBA debentures in February 2012. We had a weighted average cost of debt comprised of interest and fees of approximately ~~6.5%~~6.8% at ~~September 30, 2011,~~March 31, 2012, as compared to ~~6.2%~~7.7% during the ~~third~~first quarter of ~~2010.~~2011. The ~~increase~~decrease was primarily attributed to the ~~weighted average cost of debt on~~decline in the ~~senior convertible notes of 8.2% offset by a lower~~ weighted average cost of debt on outstanding SBA debentures at ~~5.2%~~5.8% in the ~~third~~first quarter of ~~2011~~2012 versus ~~6.1%~~7.3% in the ~~third~~first quarter of ~~2010.~~2011.

General and administrative expenses include legal fees, consulting ~~and~~fees, accounting fees, printer fees, insurance premiums, rent, workout and various other expenses. Expenses ~~remained relatively flat at approximately $1.7~~decreased to $1.8 million from $2.2 million for the three month periods ended ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2012 and 2011, ~~and 2010 and increased to $6.2 million from $5.2 million for the nine month periods ended September 30, 2011 and 2010,~~ respectively, primarily due to ~~increased recruiting, accounting~~decreases of approximately $191,000 and ~~legal expenses.~~$134,000 in auditing fees and workout related expenses, respectively.

Employee compensation and benefits totaled approximately ~~$3.3~~$3.4 million and ~~approximately $9.9~~$3.3 million during the three ~~and nine-month~~month periods ended ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2012, and 2011, respectively. Employee compensation and benefits totaled approximately $2.6 million and approximately $7.7 million during the three and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2010, respectively. This increase is primarily due to an increase in employee headcount and increased salary and executive severance costs as compared to the same period of 2010. We expect to continue to hire to meet our portfolio growth. Stock-based compensation totaled approximately ~~$870,000~~$826,000 and ~~approximately $2.5 million~~$721,000 during the three ~~and nine~~ month periods ended ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2012 and 2011, ~~respectively and approximately $752,000 and approximately $2.0 million during the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2010.~~respectively. These increases were due primarily to the expense on restricted stock grants issued in the first quarter of ~~2011.~~2012. See “Financial Condition, Liquidity, and Capital Resources” for disclosure of additional expenses.

Net Investment Income Before Investment Gains and Losses

Net investment income per share was ~~$0.20~~$0.24 for the quarter ended ~~September 30, 2011~~March 31, 2012 compared to $0.23 per share in the quarter ended ~~September 30, 2010.~~March 31, 2011, based on 47,018 and 42,737 weighted average shares outstanding, respectively. Net investment income before investment gains and losses for the three ~~and nine~~ month periods ended ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2012 and 2011, totaled ~~$8.6~~approximately $11.4 million and ~~$28.8~~$9.8 million, ~~respectively as compared to $8.1 million and $20.6 million in the three and nine month periods ended June 30, 2010,~~ respectively. The changes are made up of the items described above under “Investment Income” and “Operating Expenses.”

Net Investment Realized Gains and Losses and Unrealized Appreciation and Depreciation

Realized gains or losses are measured by the difference between the net proceeds from the repayment or sale and the cost basis of the investment without regard to unrealized appreciation or depreciation previously recognized, and includes investments charged off during the period, net of recoveries. Net change in unrealized appreciation or depreciation primarily reflects the change in portfolio investment values during the reporting period, including the reversal of previously recorded unrealized appreciation or depreciation when gains or losses are realized.

During the three ~~and nine-months~~months ended ~~September 30, 2011 the Company~~March 31, 2012, we recognized ~~total~~ net realized gains of approximately ~~$10.1~~$2.9 million on the portfolio. We recorded approximately $2.2 million and $1.3 million of realized gains from the sale of equity in BARRX Medical, Inc. and Aegerion Pharmaceuticals, Inc., respectively. These gains were partially offset by realized losses of approximately $460,000 from the sale of our common stock in ~~its~~two public portfolio companies and realized losses of approximately $1.6 million and approximately $6.7 million from equity, loan, and warrant investments in portfolio companies that have been liquidated. The loss is primarily attributeddue to the ~~termination~~complete write off of warrants in LaboPharm, Inc. of $0.6 million and the write-off of equity in Solarflare, Inc. of $0.6 million. During the three and nine-month period ended September 30, 2010 the Company recognized net realized lossesone private portfolio company that had a cost basis of approximately $18.9 million and approximately $19.2 million from equity, loan and warrant investments in portfolio companies that have been liquidated and realized gains of approximately $3.6 million from the sale of common stock in public companies and approximately $465,000 from the mergers of private portfolio companies.$355,000.

A summary of realized gains and losses for the three ~~and nine~~ month periods ended ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2012 and 2011 ~~and 2010~~ is as follows:

   Three Months Ended
September 30, Nine Months Ended
September 30,
   2011 2010 2011 2010
(in millions)
Realized gains
   $ 0.3    $ —      $ 10.6    $ 4.4
Realized losses
   (1.9 ) (18.9 ) (7.2 ) (19.5 )


Net realized gains (losses)
   $ (1.6 ) $ (18.9 ) $ 3.4    $ (15.1 )

During the three month period ended September 30, 2011 net change in unrealized depreciation totaled approximately $769,000 from loan, warrant and equity investments. Approximately $5.9 million was due to net unrealized appreciation on equity and loans, primarily attributed to the exercise of our warrants in Aveo Pharmaceuticals, Inc. to common shares. Approximately $6.6 million was due to unrealized depreciation on warrant investments, primarily attributable to the exercise of our warrants and the decrease in fair market value for public company holdings.
   Three Months Ended
March 31,
(in thousands)    2012 2011
Realized gains
   $ 3,690    $ 9,599
Realized losses
   (813 ) (5,229 )


Net realized gains (losses)
   $ 2,877    $ 4,370

During the nine month period ended September 30, 2011 net change in unrealized depreciation totaled approximately $2.8 from loan, warrant and equity investments. Approximately $4.0 million was due to net unrealized appreciation on debt and warrants, primarily attributable to the increase in fair market value for public company holdings. Approximately $6.8 million was due to unrealized depreciation on equity investments, primarily attributable to the sale of InfoLogix, Inc. in the first quarter of 2011. Approximately $8.3 million of realized gains and $8.4 million of net change in unrealized depreciation was recognized on this control investment during the three-month period ended March 31, 2011.

~~During the same periods ending September 30, 2010 net unrealized appreciation totaled approximately $2.9 million and net unrealized depreciation totaled approximately $12.2 million, respectively.~~

For the three month period ended September 30, 2011 approximately $2.2 million and $3.7 million of the net unrealized appreciation recognized was attributable to debt and equity investments, respectively, and approximately $6.6 million of net unrealized depreciation on our warrant investments. Included in this amount is unrealized appreciation of approximately $1.5 million attributable to the reversal of prior period net unrealized depreciation upon being realized as a loss and approximately $2.9 million in unrealized depreciation attributable to the exercise of warrants to equity. For the nine month period ended September 30, 2011 approximately $3.4 million and $616,000 of the net unrealized appreciation was attributable to debt and warrant investments, respectively, and approximately $6.8 million of depreciation was attributable to equity investments. As of September 30, 2011, the net unrealized depreciation recognized by the Company was increased by approximately $229,000 due to the warrant participation agreement with Citigroup. For a more detailed discussion of the warrant participation agreement, see the discussion set forth under Note 4 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

The net unrealized appreciation and depreciation of our investments is based on fair value of each investment determined in good faith by our Board of Directors. This net unrealized appreciation was primarily comprised of increases in the fair value of our portfolio companies due to positive company performance and market conditions.

The following table itemizes the change in net unrealized appreciation/depreciation of investments for the three ~~and nine-month~~month periods ended ~~September 30, 2011~~March 31, 2012 and ~~2010:~~2011:


	Three Months Ended September 30,
(in thousands)	2011			2010
Gross unrealized appreciation on portfolio investments	$	11,928		$	4,565
Gross unrealized depreciation on portfolio investments		(11,423	)		(15,824	)
Reversal of prior period net unrealized appreciation upon realization		(3,323	)		(3,912	)
Reversal of prior period net unrealized depreciation upon realization		1,913			17,888
Citigroup Warrant Participation		136			177

Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on portfolio investments	$	(769	)	$	2,894

							Three Months Ended March 31,
	Nine Months Ended September 30,						2012			2011
(in thousands)	2011			2010			Amount			Amount
Gross unrealized appreciation on portfolio investments	$	41,945		$	26,369		$	19,330		$	6,340
Gross unrealized depreciation on portfolio investments		(38,833	)		(52,867	)		(12,502	)		(17,889	)
Reversal of prior period net unrealized appreciation upon realization		(13,225	)		(3,902	)
Reversal of prior period net unrealized depreciation upon realization		7,519			18,048
Reversal of prior period net unrealized appreciation upon a realization								(4,508	)		(9,446	)
Reversal of prior period net unrealized depreciation upon a realization								429			5,606
Citigroup Warrant Participation		(229	)		134			104			37

Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on portfolio investments	$	(2,823	)	$	(12,218	)	$	2,853		$	(15,352	)

During the three-month period ended March 31, 2012, we recorded approximately $2.8 million of net unrealized appreciation from our loans, warrant and equity investments. Approximately $2.7 million and $1.6 million is attributed to net unrealized appreciation on equity and warrants, respectively, due to enterprise valuation appreciation for various portfolio companies, offset by approximately $1.5 million net unrealized depreciation on our debt investments related to fluctuations in current market interest rates.

Included in this amount is unrealized depreciation of approximately $3.5 million attributable to the reversal of prior period net unrealized appreciation upon being realized as a gain and approximately $1.1 million in unrealized depreciation attributable to the exercise of warrants to equity. As of March 31, 2012, the net unrealized depreciation recognized by us was increased by approximately $104,000 due to the warrant participation agreement with Citigroup. For a more detailed discussion of the warrant participation agreement, see the discussion set forth under Note 4 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

During the same periods ending March 31, 2011 net unrealized depreciation totaled approximately $11.4 million, $2.1 million and $1.8 million from equity, warrant and loan investments, respectively.

Income and Excise Taxes

We account for income taxes in accordance with the provisions of ASC 740, Income Taxes, which requires that deferred income taxes be determined based upon the estimated future tax effects of differences between the financial statement and tax basis of assets and liabilities given the provisions of the enacted tax law. Valuation allowances are used to reduce deferred tax assets to the amount likely to be realized.

Net Increase in Net Assets Resulting from Operations and Change in Net Assets per Share

For the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30, 2011,~~March 31, 2012, the net increase in net assets resulting from operations totaled approximately ~~$6.2 million and $29.4 million, respectively.~~$17.1 million. For the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30, 2010,~~March 31, 2011, the net decrease in net assets resulting from operations totaled approximately ~~$7.8 million and $6.7~~$1.2 million. These changes are made up of the items previously described.

Basic and fully diluted net change in net assets per common share for the three ~~and nine-month periods~~month period ended ~~September 30, 2011~~March 31, 2012 was ~~$0.14 and $0.67, respectively,~~$0.36 as compared to basic and fully diluted change in net assets per common share of ~~$(0.23) and $(0.20)~~$(0.03) for the three ~~and nine-month periods~~month period ended ~~September 30, 2010, respectively.~~March 31, 2011.

Financial Condition, Liquidity, and Capital Resources

Our liquidity and capital resources are derived from our credit facilities, SBA debentures, Convertible Senior Notes and cash flows from operations, including investment sales and repayments, and income earned. Our primary use of funds from operations includes investments in portfolio companies and payments of fees and other operating expenses we incur. We have used, and expect to continue to use, our credit facilities, SBA debentures and the proceeds from the rotation of our portfolio and from public and private offerings of securities to finance our investment objectives. We may raise additional equity or debt capital through both registered offerings off a shelf registration and private offerings of securities, by securitizing a portion of our investments or borrowing from the SBA through our SBIC subsidiaries, among other sources.

At ~~September 30, 2011,~~March 31, 2012, we had $75.0 million of Convertible Senior Notes payable and approximately ~~$96.3~~$200.7 million inSBA debentures payable. We had no borrowings outstanding under the Wells Facility and Union Bank Facility.

During the three months ended March 31, 2012, our operating activities used $17.7 million of cash and cash equivalents, ~~and available borrowing capacity~~compared to $24.8 million provided during the three months ended March 31, 2011. The $42.5 million decrease in cash provided by operating activities resulted primarily from a reduction of principal payments received on investments of approximately ~~$75.0~~$50.5 million ~~under~~during the ~~Wells Facility, $20.0~~quarter ended March 31, 2012. During the three months ended March 31, 2012, our financing activities provided $1.7 million ~~under~~of cash, compared to $15.6 million used during the ~~Union Bank Facility~~three months ended March 31, 2011. This $17.3 million increase in cash provided by financing activities was primarily attributed to net proceeds from the issuance of common stock of $47.2 million, offset by the repayments of borrowings of approximately $34.8 million and ~~$36.25 million under the SBA program, subject to existing terms and advance rates and regulatory requirements. We primarily invest~~by cash ~~on hand in interest bearing deposit accounts.~~dividend payments of $10.7 million.

As of ~~September 30, 2011,~~March 31, 2012, net assets totaled ~~$422.1~~$485.4 million, with a net asset value per share of ~~$9.61.~~$9.76. We intend to generate additional cash primarily from cash flows from operations, including income earned from investments in our portfolio companies and, to a lesser extent, from the temporary investment of cash in ~~U.S. government securities and~~ other high-quality debt investments that mature in one year or less as well as from future borrowings as required to meet our lending activities. Our primary use of funds will be investments in portfolio companies and cash distributions to holders of our common stock.

In January 2012, we completed a follow-on public offering of 5.0 million shares of common stock for proceeds of approximately $48.05 million, before deducting offering expenses, to us. Additionally, we expect to raise additional capital to support our future growth through future equity offerings, issuances of senior securities and/or future borrowings, to the extent permitted by the 1940 Act. To the extent we determine to raise additional equity through an offering of our common stock at a price below net asset value, existing investors will experience dilution. During our 2011 Annual Shareholder Meeting held on June 1, 2011, our ~~shareholders~~stockholders authorized us, with the approval of our Board of Directors, to sell up to 20% of our outstanding common stock at a price below our then current net asset value per share and to offer and issue debt with warrants or debt convertible into shares of our common stock at an exercise or conversion price that will not be less than the fair market value per share but may be below the then current net asset value per share. ~~However, there~~At our Annual Meeting of Stockholders scheduled for May 30, 2012, or any adjournment thereof, we will again seek to obtain such shareholder authorization. There can be no assurance that these capital resources will be ~~available given the credit constraints of the banking and capital markets.~~available.

As required by the 1940 Act, our asset coverage must be at least 200% after each issuance of senior securities. As of ~~September 30, 2011~~March 31, 2012 our asset coverage ratio under our regulatory requirements as a business development company was ~~971.5%~~1,009.1%, excluding our ~~SBIC~~SBA debentures as a result of our exemptive order from the SEC which allows us to exclude all SBA leverage from our asset coverage ratio. Total leverage when including our ~~SBIC~~SBA debentures was ~~263.1%~~274.5% at ~~September 30, 2011.~~March 31, 2012. As a result of the SEC exemptive order, our ratio of total assets on a consolidated basis to outstanding indebtedness may be less than 200%, which while providing increased investment flexibility, also may increase our exposure to risks associated with leverage.

During the nine months ended September 30, 2011, our operating activities used $72.5 million of cash and cash equivalents, compared to $45.6 million used during the nine months ended September 30, 2010. The $26.9 million increase in cash used in operating activities resulted primarily from increased investing activity. During the nine months ended September 30, 2011, our financing activities provided $62.0 million of cash, compared to $4.2 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2010. This $57.9 million increase in cash provided by financing activities was due primarily due to the issuance of $75.0 million of Convertible Senior Notes in April 2011.

At ~~September 30, 2011~~March 31, 2012 (unaudited) and December 31, ~~2010,~~2011, we had the following borrowing capacity and outstanding amounts:


	September 30, 2011				December 31, 2010				March 31, 2012				December 31, 2011
	Total Available		Carrying Value⁽¹⁾		Total Available		Carrying Value⁽¹⁾
(in thousands)									Total Available		Carrying Value⁽¹⁾		Total Available		Carrying Value⁽¹⁾
Union Bank Facility	$	20,000	$	—	$	20,000	$	—	$	55,000	$	—	$	55,000	$	—
Wells Facility		75,000		—		50,000		—		75,000		—		75,000		10,187
Convertible Senior Notes⁽²⁾		75,000		70,082		—		—		75,000		70,624		75,000		70,353
SBA Debenture⁽³⁾		225,000		188,750		225,000		170,000
SBA Debentures⁽³⁾										225,000		200,750		225,000		225,000

Total	$	395,000	$	258,832	$	295,000	$	170,000	$	430,000	$	271,374	$	430,000	$	305,540

⁽¹⁾	Except for the Convertible Senior Notes, ~~(as defined below),~~ all carrying values are the same as the principal amount outstanding.

⁽²⁾

Represents the aggregate principal amount outstanding of the Convertible Senior Notes ~~(as defined below)~~ less the unaccreted discount initially recorded upon issuance of the Convertible Senior Notes. The total unaccreted discount for the Convertible Senior Notes was ~~$4,918~~$4,376 at ~~September 30, 2011.~~March 31, 2012.

⁽³⁾

~~The Company has~~In February 2012, we repaid $24.3 million of SBA debentures under HT II, priced at approximately 6.63%, including annual fees. In April 2012, we submitted a request to the ~~ability~~SBA to borrow ~~an additional $36.3~~the $24.3 million under a new capital commitment under HT III, subject to SBA ~~approval and compliance with SBIC regulations.~~approval. There can be no assurances that the SBA will approve our new capital commitment request, what the pricing will be or that we will draw on any possible commitment.

On September 27, 2006, HT II received a license and on May 26, 2010 HT III received a license to operate as SBICs under the SBIC program and are able to borrow funds from the SBA against eligible investments. As of ~~September 30, 2011,~~March 31, 2012, all required contributed capital from the Company has been invested into HT II and HT III. ~~The Company is~~We are the sole limited partner of HT II and HT III and HTM is the general partner. HTM is aour wholly-owned ~~subsidiary of the Company.~~subsidiary. If HT II or HT III fails to comply with applicable SBA regulations, the SBA could, depending on the severity of the violation, limit or prohibit HT II’s or HT III’s use of debentures, declare outstanding debentures immediately due and payable, and/or limit HT II or HT III from making new investments. In addition, HT II or HT III may also be limited in their ability to make distributions to us if they do not have sufficient capital in accordance with SBA regulations. Such actions by the SBA would, in turn, negatively affect us because HT II and HT III are our wholly owned subsidiaries. HT II and HT III were in compliance with the terms of the SBIC’s leverage as of ~~September 30, 2011~~March 31, 2012 as a result of having sufficient capital as defined under the SBA regulations. ~~In aggregate,~~ HT II and HT III hold approximately ~~$334.9~~$198.4 million and $170.3 million in assets, respectively, and accounted for approximately ~~35.5%~~19.5% and 16.7% of our total assets prior to consolidation at ~~September 30, 2011.~~March 31, 2012.

With our net investment of $75.0 million in HT II as of ~~September 30, 2011,~~March 31, 2012, HT II has the capacity to issue a total of $125.0 million of SBA guaranteed debentures, of which ~~$125.0~~$100.7 million was outstanding at ~~September 30, 2011.~~March 31, 2012. As of ~~September 30, 2011,~~March 31, 2012, the maximum statutory limit on the dollar amount of outstanding SBA guaranteed debentures issued by a single SBIC is $150.0 million, subject to periodic adjustments by the SBA. As of ~~September 30, 2011,~~March 31, 2012, HT II has paid the SBA commitment fees of approximately $1.5 million. As of March 31, 2012, we held investments in HT II in 8454 companies with a fair value of approximately ~~$180.8~~$188.1 million, accounting for approximately ~~31.4%~~27.1% of our total portfolio at ~~September 30, 2011.~~March 31, 2012.

As of September 30, 2011, the maximum statutory limit on the dollar amount of combined outstanding SBA guaranteed debentures is $225.0 million, subject to periodic adjustments by the SBA. As of September 30, 2011,March 31, 2012, HT III had the potential to borrow up to $100.0 million of SBA-guaranteed debentures under the SBIC program. With our net investment of $50.0 million in HT III as of ~~September 30, 2011,~~March 31, 2012, HT III has the capacity to issue a total of $100.0 million of SBA guaranteed debentures, subject to SBA approval, of which ~~$63.75~~$100.0 million was outstanding at ~~September 30, 2011.~~March 31, 2012. As of ~~September 30, 2011,~~March 31, 2012, HT III has paid the SBA commitment fees of approximately ~~$750,000.~~$1.0 million. As of ~~September 30, 2011,~~March 31, 2012, we held investments in HT III in 2025 companies with a fair value of approximately ~~$92.4~~$129.0 million accounting for approximately ~~16.0%~~18.6% of our total portfolio at ~~September 30, 2011.~~March 31, 2012.



(in thousands) Issuance/Pooling Date	Maturity Date	Interest Rate⁽¹⁾			September 30, 2011		December 31, 2010		Maturity Date	Interest Rate⁽¹⁾			March 31, 2012		December 31, 2011
SBA Debentures:
September 26, 2007	September 1, 2017		6.43	%	$	12,000	$	12,000	September 1, 2017		6.43	%	$	12,000	$	12,000
March 26, 2008	March 1, 2018		6.38	%	$	58,050	$	58,050	March 1, 2018		6.38	%		47,550		58,050
September 24, 2008	September 1, 2018		6.63	%	$	13,750	$	38,750	September 1, 2018		6.63	%		—		13,750
March 25, 2009	March 1, 2019		5.53	%	$	18,400	$	18,400	March 1, 2019		5.53	%		18,400		18,400
September 23, 2009	September 1, 2019		4.64	%	$	3,400	$	3,400	September 1, 2019		4.64	%		3,400		3,400
September 22, 2010	September 1, 2020		3.62	%	$	6,500	$	6,500	September 1, 2020		3.62	%		6,500		6,500
September 22, 2010	September 1, 2020		3.50	%	$	22,900	$	32,900	September 1, 2020		3.50	%		22,900		22,900
March 29, 2011	March 1, 2021		4.37	%	$	28,750	$	—	March 1, 2021		4.37	%		28,750		28,750
September 21, 2011	September 1, 2021		3.16	%	$	25,000	$	—	September 1, 2021		3.16	%		25,000		25,000
March 21, 2012									March 1, 2022		3.05	%		11,250		11,250
March 21, 2012									March 1, 2022		3.28	%		25,000		25,000

Total SBA Debentures					$	188,750	$	170,000					$	200,750	$	225,000

⁽¹⁾	Interest rate includes annual charge

~~Current Market Conditions~~As of March 31, 2012, the maximum statutory limit on the dollar amount of combined outstanding SBA guaranteed debentures is $225.0 million, subject to periodic adjustments by the SBA. In the aggregate, at March 31, 2012 there was $200.7 million principal amount of indebtedness outstanding incurred by our SBIC subsidiaries and we intend to seek an additional $24.3 million under HT III, which will bring us to the maximum statutory limit on the dollar amount of SBA guaranteed debentures under the SBIC program.

~~Beginning in~~We believe that our current cash and cash equivalents, cash generated from operations, and funds available from the ~~fall of 2008, the global economy entered a financial crisis and recession. Volatile~~credit facilities will be sufficient to meet our working capital and credit markets, declining business and consumer confidence and increased unemployment precipitated a continuing economic slowdown. Although there have been signs of recovery in many regions, economic weakness could continue or worsen. For example,capital expenditure commitments for at least the current U.S. debt ceiling and budget deficit concerns, together with signs of deteriorating sovereign debt conditions in Europe, have increased the possibility of credit-rating downgrades and economic slowdowns. Although U.S. lawmakers passed legislation to raise the federal debt ceiling, Standard & Poor’s Ratings Services lowered its long-term sovereign credit rating on the United States from “AAA” to “AA+” on August 5, 2011. The impact of this or any further downgrades to the U.S. government’s sovereign credit rating, or its perceived creditworthiness, and the impact of the current crisis in Europe with respect to the ability of certain European Union countries to continue to service their sovereign debt obligations is inherently unpredictable and could adversely effect the U.S. and global financial markets and economic conditions. There can be no assurance that governmental or other measures to aid economic recovery will be effective. We anticipate that there may be yield compression as 2011 comes to an end, however, given our level of liquidity and pipeline, we believe that we are well positioned despite the uncertainty in the market. Continued adverse economic conditions could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.next 12 months.

We may acquire a portfolio of investments or sell a portion of our portfolio on an opportunistic basis. We, from time to time, engage in discussions with counterparties in respect of various potential transactions. Some of these transactions could be material to our business. Consummation of any such transaction will be subject to completion of due diligence finalization of key business and financial terms (including price) and negotiation of final definitive documentation as well as a number of other factors and conditions including, without limitation, the approval of our Board of Directors and required third party consents and, in certain cases, the approval of our stockholders. Accordingly, there can be no assurance that any such transaction would be consummated.

We periodically review and assess investment portfolio acquisition opportunities of target companies that would be accretive to us. In the future, we may determine to acquire such portfolios which could affect our liquidity position and necessitate our need to raise additional capital to fund our growth.

Commitments

In the normal course of business, we are party to financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk. These consist primarily of unfunded commitments to extend credit, in the form of loans, to our portfolio companies. Unfunded commitments to provide funds to portfolio companies are not reflected on our balance sheet. Our ~~origination activity~~ unfunded commitments may be significant from time to time. As of ~~September 30, 2011,~~March 31, 2012, we had unfunded commitments of approximately ~~$148.2~~$125.4 million. Approximately $40.1 million of these unfunded debt commitments are dependent upon the portfolio company reaching certain milestones before the debt commitment becomes available. These commitments will be subject to the same underwriting and ongoing portfolio maintenance as are the on-balance sheet financial instruments that we hold. Since these commitments may expire without being drawn upon, the total commitment amount does not necessarily represent future cash requirements. Closed commitments generally fund 70-80% of the committed amount in aggregate over the life of the commitment. We intend to use cash flow from normal and early principal repayments, SBA debentures, our Wells Facility, our Union Bank Facility and the proceeds from our Convertible Senior ~~Secured~~ Notes to fund these commitments. However, there can be no assurance that we will have sufficient capital available to fund these commitments as they come due.

In addition, we had approximately ~~$136.0~~$59.3 million of non-binding term sheets outstanding ~~with nine~~to eight new and existing companies, which generally convert to contractual commitments within approximately 45 to 60 days of signing. Non-binding outstanding term ~~from prior release~~sheets are subject to completion of our due diligence and final approval process, as well as the negotiation of definitive documentation with the prospective portfolio companies. Not all non-binding term sheets are expected to close and do not necessarily represent future cash requirements.

Contractual Obligations

The following table shows our contractual obligations as of ~~September 30, 2011:~~March 31, 2012:


	Payments due by period (in thousands)										Payments due by period (in thousands)
Contractual Obligations⁽¹⁾⁽²⁾	Total		Less than 1 year		1 - 3 years		3 - 5 years⁽³⁾		After 5 years⁽⁴⁾		Total		Less than 1 year		1 - 3 years		3 - 5 years		After 5 years
Borrowings⁽⁴⁾	$	258,832	$	—	$	—	$	70,082	$	188,750	$	271,374	$	—	$	—	$	70,624	$	200,750
Operating Lease Obligations⁽⁵⁾		2,488		1,242		1,245		—		—		8,186		1,248		2,288		2,538		2,112

Total	$	261,320	$	1,242	$	1,245	$	70,082	$	188,750	$	279,560	$	1,248	$	2,288	$	73,162	$	202,862

(1)	Excludes commitments to extend credit to our portfolio companies.

(2)	We also have a warrant participation ~~obligation~~agreement with Citigroup. See ~~“Borrowings.”~~Note 4 to our consolidated financial statements.

(3)	~~Represents~~Includes borrowings under the SBA debentures. There were no outstanding borrowings under the Wells Facility or Union Bank Facility at March 31, 2012.

(4)

Except for the Convertible Senior Notes, all carrying values are the same as the principal amount outstanding. The aggregate principal amount outstanding of the Convertible Senior Notes ~~(as defined below)~~ less the unaccreted discount initially recorded upon issuance of the Convertible ~~Notes. The total unaccreted discount for the Convertible~~ Senior Notes was ~~$4,918~~$4,376 at ~~September 30, 2011.~~

~~(4)~~

~~Borrowings under the SBA debentures~~March 31, 2012.

(5)	Long-term facility ~~leases~~leases.

~~Hercules~~

We and ~~its~~our executives and directors are covered by Directors and Officers Insurance, with the directors and officers being indemnified by ~~Hercules~~us to the maximum extent permitted by Maryland law subject to the restrictions in the 1940 Act.

Borrowings

Long-term SBA Debentures

On September 27, 2006, HT II received a license to operate as a SBIC under the SBIC program and is able to borrow funds from the SBA against eligible investments and regulatory capital. Under the Small Business Investment Company Act and current SBA policy applicable to SBICs, a SBIC can have outstanding at any time SBA guaranteed debentures up to twice the amount of its regulatory capital. As of ~~September 30, 2011,~~March 31, 2012, the maximum statutory limit on the dollar amount of outstanding SBA guaranteed debentures issued by a single SBIC is $150.0 million, subject to periodic adjustments by the SBA. HT II has a total of ~~$125.0~~$100.7 million of SBA guaranteed debentures outstanding as of ~~September 30, 2011~~March 31, 2012 and has paid the SBA commitment fees of approximately $1.5 million. As of ~~September 30, 2011,~~March 31, 2012, the Company held investments in HT II in 8454 companies with a fair value of approximately ~~$180.8~~$188.1 million, accounting for approximately ~~31.4%~~27.1% of our total portfolio at ~~September 30, 2011.~~March 31, 2012.

On May 26, 2010, HT III received a license to operate as a SBIC under the SBIC program and is able to borrow funds from the SBA against eligible investments and additional contributions to regulatory capital. With ~~the Company’s~~our net investment of $50.0 million in HT III as of ~~September 30, 2011,~~March 31, 2012, HT III has the capacity to issue a total of $100.0 million of SBA guaranteed debentures, subject to SBA approval, of which ~~$63.75~~$100.0 million was outstanding as of ~~September 30, 2011.~~March 31, 2012. As of ~~September 30, 2011,~~March 31, 2012, HT III has paid commitment fees of approximately ~~$750,000.~~$1.0 million. As of ~~September 30, 2011, the Company~~March 31, 2012, we held investments in HT III in 2025 companies with a fair value of approximately ~~$92.4~~$129.0 million accounting for approximately ~~16.0%~~18.6% of our total portfolio at ~~September 30, 2011.~~March 31, 2012.

There is no assurance that HT II or HT III will be able to draw up to the maximum limit available under the SBIC program.

SBICs are designed to stimulate the flow of private equity capital to eligible small businesses. Under present SBA regulations, eligible small businesses include businesses that have a tangible net worth not exceeding ~~$18~~$18.0 million and have average annual fully taxed net income not exceeding $6.0 million for the two most recent fiscal years. In addition, SBICs must devote 25.0% of its investment activity to “smaller” concerns as defined by the SBA. A smaller concern is one that has a tangible net worth not exceeding $6.0 million and has average annual fully taxed net income not exceeding $2.0 million for the two most recent fiscal years. SBA regulations also provide alternative size standard criteria to determine eligibility, which depend on the industry in which the business is engaged and are based on such factors as the number of employees and gross sales. According to SBA regulations, SBICs may make long-term loans to small businesses, invest in the equity securities of such businesses and provide them with consulting and advisory services. Through its wholly-owned subsidiaries HT II and HT III, ~~the Company plans~~we plan to provide long-term loans to qualifying small businesses, and in connection therewith, make equity investments.

HT II and HT III are periodically examined and audited by the SBA’s staff to determine their compliance with SBA regulations. If HT II or HT III fails to comply with applicable SBA regulations, the SBA could, depending on the severity of the violation, limit or prohibit HT II’s or HT III’s use of debentures, declare outstanding debentures immediately due and payable, and/or limit HT II or HT III from making new investments. In addition, HT II or HT III may also be limited in their ability to make distributions to ~~the Company~~us if they do not have sufficient capital in accordance with SBA regulations. Such actions by the SBA would, in turn, negatively affect ~~the Company~~us because HT II and III are ~~the Company’s~~our wholly owned subsidiaries. HT II and HT III were in compliance with the terms of the SBIC’s leverage as of ~~September 30, 2011~~March 31, 2012 as a result of having sufficient capital as defined under the SBA regulations. ~~As of September 30, 2011, HT III could draw up to $36.25 million, respectively, of additional leverage from SBA.~~

In January 2011, we repaid $25.0 million of SBA debentures under HT II, priced at approximately 6.63%, including annual fees. In February 2011, we submitted a request to the SBA to borrow $25.0 million under a new capital commitment and in April 2011, the SBA approved a $25.0 million dollar commitment for HT III bringing the total available borrowings to $225.0 million, of which $125.0 million was available in HT II and $100.0 million was available in HT III.

In February 2012, we repaid $24.3 million of SBA debentures under HT II, priced at 6.63%, including annual fees. In April 2012, we submitted a request to the SBA to borrow the $24.3 million under a new capital commitment under HT III, subject to SBA approval. There can be no assurances that the SBA will approve our new capital commitment request, what the pricing will be or that we will draw on any possible commitment.

Wells Facility

OnIn August ~~25,~~ 2008, ~~Hercules, through a special purpose wholly-owned subsidiary, Hercules Funding II, LLC,~~we entered into a $50.0 million two-year revolving senior secured credit facility with ~~an optional one-year extension with total commitments of $50.0 million, with~~ Wells Fargo Capital Finance ~~as a lender and as an arranger and administrative agent~~ (the “Wells Facility”). ~~The Wells Facility has the capacity to increase to $300.0 million if additional lenders are added to the syndicate. The Wells Facility expired in August 2011.~~

Borrowings under the Wells Facility will generally bear interest at a rate per annum equal to LIBOR plus 3.25% or PRIME plus 2.0%, but not less than 5.0%. The Wells Facility is collateralized by debt investments in our portfolio companies, and includes an advance rate equal to 50% of eligible loans placed in the collateral pool. The Wells Facility generally requires payment of interest on a monthly basis. All outstanding principal is due upon maturity. We have paid a total of $1.1 million in structuring fees in connection with the Wells Facility which has been amortized through August 2011.

The Wells Facility includes various financial and operating covenants applicable to the Company and its subsidiaries, in addition to those applicable to Hercules Funding II, LLC. These covenants require us to maintain certain financial ratios and a minimum tangible net worth in an amount, when added to outstanding Subordinated Indebtedness, that is in excess of $314.0 million plus 90% of the cumulative amount of equity raised after March 31, 2011. In addition, the tangible net worth covenant will increase by 90 cents on the dollar for every dollar of equity capital subsequently raised by the Company. The Wells Facility provides for customary events of default, including, but not limited to, payment defaults, breach of representations or covenants, bankruptcy events and change of control. We were in compliance with all covenants at September 30, 2011.

On June 20, 2011, we renewed the Wells Facility. Under this three-year senior secured facility, Wells Fargo Capital Finance has made commitments of $75.0 million. Borrowings under the facility will generally bear interest at a rate per annum equal to LIBOR plus 3.50%, with a floor of 5.00% and an advance rate of 50% against eligible loans. The facility will be secured by loans in the borrowing base. The Wells Facility requires the monthly payment of a non-use fee of 0.3% for each payment date on or before September 1, 2011. The monthly payment of a non-use fee thereafter shall depend on the average balance that was outstanding on a scale between 0.0% and 0.75%. From September 1, 2011 through September 30, 2011, this non-use fee was 0.75%. The facility contains an accordion feature, in which we can increase the credit line up to an aggregate of $300.0 million, funded by additional lenders and with the agreement of Wells Fargo Capital Finance and subject to other customary conditions. We expect to continue discussions with various other potential lenders to join the new facility; however, there can be no assurances that additional lenders will join the ~~new credit facility. This new arrangement replaced~~Wells Facility.

Borrowings under the ~~previous $300.0 million~~ Wells Facility ~~under which~~will generally bear interest at a rate per annum equal to LIBOR plus 3.50%, with a floor of 5.00% and an advance rate of 50% against eligible loans. The Wells ~~Fargo Capital Finance had committed $50.0 million~~Facility is secured by loans in ~~capital.~~the borrowing base. The Wells Facility requires the monthly payment of a non-use fee of 0.3% for each payment date on or before September 1, 2011. The monthly payment of a non-use fee thereafter shall depend on the average balance that was outstanding on a scale between 0.0% and 0.75%. For the three-month period ended March 31, 2012, this non-use fee was approximately $137,000. On June 20, 2011 we paid an additional $1.1 million in structuring fees in connection with the Wells Facility which is being amortized through June 2014. ~~There was no~~In January 2012, we repaid the entire principal balance outstanding ~~debt~~as of December 31, 2011 under the Wells Facility ~~at September 30, 2011.~~

~~We anticipate incurring a non-use fee expense~~ of approximately ~~$200,000 or $0.005 per share per quarter until we borrow~~$10.2 million. At March 31, 2012, there were no borrowings outstanding under the Wells Facility. ~~In total, we expect the expense from the Convertible Senior Notes~~

The Wells Facility includes various financial and ~~facility fees~~operating covenants applicable to ~~negatively impact earnings~~us and our subsidiaries, in ~~the near term by approximately $1.5~~addition to those applicable to Hercules Funding II, LLC. These covenants require us to maintain certain financial ratios and a minimum tangible net worth in an amount, when added to outstanding subordinated indebtedness, that is in excess of $314.0 million ~~or $0.04 per quarter until any~~plus 90% of the cumulative amount of equity raised after March 31, 2011. In addition, the tangible net worth covenant will increase by 90 cents on the dollar for every dollar of equity capital ~~is deployed.~~that we subsequently raise. As of March 31, 2012, the minimum tangible net worth covenant has increased to $357.2 million as a result of the January 2012 follow-on public offering of 5.0 million shares of common stock for proceeds of approximately $48.05 million. The Wells Facility provides for customary events of default, including, but not limited to, payment defaults, breach of representations or covenants, bankruptcy events and change of control. We were in compliance with all covenants at March 31, 2012.

Union Bank Facility

On February 10, 2010, we entered a $20.0 million one-year revolving senior secured credit facility with Union Bank (the “Union Bank Facility”). On November 2, 2011, we renewed and amended the Union Bank Facility and added a new lender under the Union Bank Facility. Union Bank and RBC Capital Markets have made commitments of $30.0 million and $25.0 million, respectively. The Union Bank Facility contains an accordion feature, in which we can increase the credit line up to an aggregate of $150.0 million, funded by additional lenders and with the agreement of Union Bank and subject to other customary conditions. We expect to continue discussions with various other potential lenders to join the new facility; however, there can be no assurances that additional lenders will join the Union Bank Facility.

Borrowings under the Union Bank Facility will generally bear interest at a rate per annum equal to LIBOR plus 2.25% with a floor of 4.0%~~, an advance rate of 50% against eligible loans, and secured by loans in the borrowing base.~~. The Union Bank Facility ~~required~~requires the payment of a non-use fee of ~~0.25%~~0.50% annually. For the three-month period ended March 31, 2012, this non-use fee was approximately $70,000. The Union Bank Facility is collateralized by debt investments in our portfolio companies, and includes an advance rate equal to 50.0% of eligible loans placed in the collateral pool. The Union Bank Facility generally requires payment of interest on a monthly basis. All outstanding principal is due upon maturity. ~~In February 2011, the maturity date of the facility was extended from May 1, 2011 to July~~At March 31, ~~2011. Union Bank Facility provides for customary events of default, including, but not limited to, payment defaults, breach of representations or covenants, bankruptcy events and change of control. We~~2012, there were ~~in compliance with all covenants at September 30, 2011.~~no borrowings outstanding on this facility.

On June 7, 2011, we entered into an amendment to the Union Bank Facility which extended the borrowing termination date to September 30, 2011. The amendment to the Union Bank Facility also amends the maturity date of Union Bank’s $20.0 million commitment to mean the earliest of: (a) December 31, 2011; (b) the date on which Union Bank’s obligation to make loans is terminated and the obligations are declared to be due and payable or the commitment is terminated; or (c) the date of prepayment in full by the Company. There was no outstanding debt under the Union Bank Facility at September 30, 2011.

~~On November 2, 2011, we renewed and amended the Union Bank Facility. Union Bank and RBC Capital Markets have made commitments of $30.0 million and $25.0 million, respectively.~~ The Union Bank Facility requires various financial and operating covenants. These covenants require us to maintain certain financial ratios and a minimum tangible net worth in an amount, when added to outstanding ~~Subordinated Indebtedness,~~subordinated indebtedness, that is in excess of $314.0 million plus 90% of the amount of net cash proceeds received from the sale of common stock after March 31, 2011. As of March 31, 2012, the minimum tangible net worth covenant has increased to $356.5 million as a result of the January 2012 follow-on public offering of 5.0 million shares of common stock for net proceeds of approximately $47.2 million. The Union Bank Facility will mature on November 2, 2014, approximately three years from the date of issuance, revolving through the first 24 months with a term out provision for the remaining 12 months. ~~The~~ Union Bank Facility ~~requires~~also provides for customary events of default, including, but not limited to, payment defaults, breach of representations or covenants, bankruptcy events and change of control. On March 30, 2012 the ~~payment of a non-use fee of 0.50% annually. The other terms of~~Company entered into an amendment to the Union Bank Facility ~~generally remain unchanged, including~~which permitted the ~~stated interest rate.~~Company to issue additional senior notes relating to our offer and sale of $43.0 million aggregate principal amount of 7.00% senior notes due 2019 (the “2019 Notes”). The ~~Union Bank Facility contains an accordion feature,~~offering of the 2019 Notes closed on April 17, 2012. We were in ~~which we can increase the credit line up to an aggregate of $150.0 million, funded by additional lenders and~~compliance with ~~the agreement of Union Bank and subject to other customary conditions.~~all covenants at March 31, 2012.

Convertible Senior Notes

In April 2011, we issued $75.0 million in aggregate ~~principle~~principal amount of 6.00% convertible senior notes (the “Convertible Senior Notes”) due 2016. As of ~~September 30, 2011,~~March 31, 2012, the carrying value of the Convertible Senior Notes, comprised of the aggregate principal amount outstanding less the unaccreted discount initially recorded upon issuance of the Convertible Senior Notes, is approximately ~~$70.1~~$70.6 million.

The Convertible Senior Notes mature on April 15, 2016 (the “Maturity Date”), unless previously converted or repurchased in accordance with their terms. The Convertible Senior Notes bear interest at a rate of 6.00% per year payable semiannually in arrears on April 15 and October 15 of each year, commencing on October 15, 2011. The Convertible Senior Notes are our senior unsecured obligations and rank senior in right of payment to our existing and future indebtedness that is expressly subordinated in right of payment to the Convertible Senior Notes; equal in right of payment to our existing and future unsecured indebtedness that is not so subordinated; effectively junior in right of payment to any of our secured indebtedness (including unsecured indebtedness that we later secure) to the extent of the value of the assets securing such indebtedness; and structurally junior to all existing and future indebtedness (including trade payables) incurred by our subsidiaries, financing vehicles or similar facilities.

Prior to the close of business on the business day immediately preceding October 15, 2015, holders may convert their Convertible Senior Notes only under certain circumstances set forth in the Indenture. On or after October 15, 2015 until the close of business on the scheduled trading day immediately preceding the Maturity Date, holders may convert their Convertible Senior Notes at any time. Upon conversion, we will pay or deliver, as the case may be, at our election, cash, shares of its common stock or a combination of cash and shares of its common stock. The conversion rate will initially be 84.0972 shares of common stock per $1,000 principal amount of Convertible Senior Notes (equivalent to an initial conversion price of approximately $11.89 per share of common stock). The conversion rate will be subject to adjustment in some events but will not be adjusted for any accrued and unpaid interest. In addition, if certain corporate events occur prior to the Maturity Date, the conversion rate will be increased for converting holders.

We may not redeem the Convertible Senior Notes prior to maturity. No sinking fund is provided for the Convertible Senior Notes. In addition, if certain corporate events occur, holders of the Convertible Senior Notes may require us to repurchase for cash all or part of their Convertible Senior Notes at a repurchase price equal to 100% of the principal amount of the Convertible Senior Notes to be repurchased, plus accrued and unpaid interest through, but excluding, the required repurchase date.

In accounting for the Convertible Senior Notes, we estimated that the values of the debt and the embedded conversion feature of the Convertible Senior Notes were approximately 92.8% and 7.2%, respectively. The original issue discount of 7.2% attributable to the conversion feature of the Convertible Senior Notes has initially bebeen recorded in “capital in excess of par value” in the consolidated statement of assets and liabilities. As a result, we record interest expense comprised of both stated interest expense as well as accretion of the original issue discount resulting in an estimated effective interest rate of approximately 7.9%.

As of ~~September 30, 2011,~~March 31, 2012, the components of the carrying value of the Convertible Senior Notes were as follows:


(in thousands)	As of September 30, 2011			As of March 31, 2012
Principal amount of debt	$	75,000		$	75,000
Original issue discount, net of accretion		(4,918	)		(4,376	)

Carrying value of debt	$	70,082		$	70,624


	Three Months Ended September 30, 2011		Nine Months Ended September 30, 2011
(in thousands)					Three Months Ended March 31, 2012
Stated interest expense	$	1,125	$	2,062	$	1,125
Accretion of original issue discount		270		496		271
Amortization of debt issuance cost		144		264		144

Total interest expense	$	1,539	$	2,822
Total interest expense and fees					$	1,540

Cash paid for interest expense	$	—	$	—	$	—

As of ~~September 30, 2011,~~March 31, 2012, we are in compliance with the terms of the indentures governing the Convertible Senior Notes. See Note 4 to our consolidated financial statements for ~~the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011 for~~ more detail on the Convertible Senior Notes.

Citibank Credit Facility

We, through Hercules Funding Trust I, an affiliated statutory trust, had a securitized credit facility (the “Citibank Credit Facility”) with Citigroup Global Markets Realty Corp. which expired under normal terms. During the first quarter of 2009, we paid off all ~~remaining~~ principal and interest owed under the Citibank Credit Facility. Citigroup has an equity participation right through a warrant participation agreement on the pool of loans and warrants collateralized under the Citibank Credit Facility. Pursuant to the warrant participation agreement, we granted to Citigroup a 10% participation in all warrants held as collateral. However, no additional warrants were included in collateral subsequent to the facility amendment on May 2, 2007. As a result, Citigroup is entitled to 10% of the realized gains on the warrants until the realized gains paid to Citigroup pursuant to the agreement equal $3,750,000 (the “Maximum Participation Limit”). The obligations under the warrant participation agreement continue even after the Citibank Credit Facility is terminated until the Maximum Participation Limit has been reached. The value of their participation right on unrealized gains in the related equity investments was approximately ~~$727,000~~$611,000 as of ~~September 30, 2011~~March 31, 2012 and is included in accrued liabilities. There can be no assurances that the unrealized appreciation of the warrants will not be higher or lower in future periods due to fluctuations in the value of the warrants, thereby increasing or reducing the effect on the cost of borrowing. Since inception of the agreement, we have paid Citigroup approximately $1.1 million under the warrant participation agreement thereby reducing its realized gains by this amount. We will continue to pay Citigroup under the warrant participation agreement until the Maximum Participation Limit is reached or the warrants expire.

Warrants subject to the Citigroup participation agreement are set to expire between April 2012 and January 2017.

Outstanding Borrowings

At ~~September 30, 2011~~March 31, 2012 (unaudited) and December 31, ~~2010,~~2011, we had the following borrowing capacity and outstanding borrowings:


	September 30, 2011				December 31, 2010				March 31, 2012				December 31, 2011
	Total Available		Carrying Value⁽¹⁾		Total Available		Carrying Value⁽¹⁾
(in thousands)									Total Available		Carrying Value⁽¹⁾		Total Available		Carrying Value⁽¹⁾
Union Bank Facility	$	20,000	$	—	$	20,000	$	—	$	55,000	$	—	$	55,000	$	—
Wells Facility		75,000		—		50,000		—		75,000		—		75,000		10,187
Convertible Senior Notes⁽²⁾		75,000		70,082		—		—		75,000		70,624		75,000		70,353
SBA Debenture⁽³⁾		225,000		188,750		225,000		170,000
SBA Debentures⁽³⁾										225,000		200,750		225,000		225,000

Total	$	395,000	$	258,832	$	295,000	$	170,000	$	430,000	$	271,374	$	430,000	$	305,540

⁽¹⁾	Except for the Convertible Senior Notes, ~~(as defined above),~~ all carrying values are the same as the principal amount outstanding.

⁽²⁾

Represents the aggregate principal amount outstanding of the Convertible Senior Notes ~~(as defined above)~~ less the unaccreted discount initially recorded upon issuance of the Convertible Senior Notes. The total unaccreted discount for the Convertible Senior Notes was ~~$4,918~~$4,376 at ~~September 30, 2011.~~March 31, 2012.

⁽³⁾

~~The Company has~~In February 2012, we repaid $24.3 million of SBA debentures under HT II, priced at approximately 6.63%, including annual fees. In April 2012, we submitted a request to the ~~ability~~SBA to borrow ~~an additional $36.3~~the $24.3 million under a new capital commitment under HT III, subject to SBA ~~approval and compliance with SBIC regulations for which they have received a~~approval. There can be no assurances that the SBA will approve our new capital commitment request, what or the pricing will be or that we will draw on any possible commitment.

Dividends

The following table summarizes our dividends declared and paid or to be paid on all shares, including restricted stock, to date:


~~Date Declared~~	~~Record Date~~	~~Payment Date~~	~~Amount Per Share~~
~~October 27, 2005~~	~~November 1, 2005~~	~~November 17, 2005~~	$	~~0.025~~
~~December 9, 2005~~	~~January 6, 2006~~	~~January 27, 2006~~		~~0.300~~
~~April 3, 2006~~	~~April 10, 2006~~	~~May 5, 2006~~		~~0.300~~
~~July 19, 2006~~	~~July 31, 2006~~	~~August 28, 2006~~		~~0.300~~
~~October 16, 2006~~	~~November 6, 2006~~	~~December 1, 2006~~		~~0.300~~
~~February 7, 2007~~	~~February 19, 2007~~	~~March 19, 2007~~		~~0.300~~
~~May 3, 2007~~	~~May 16, 2007~~	~~June 18, 2007~~		~~0.300~~
~~August 2, 2007~~	~~August 16, 2007~~	~~September 17, 2007~~		~~0.300~~
~~November 1, 2007~~	~~November 16, 2007~~	~~December 17, 2007~~		~~0.300~~
~~February 7, 2008~~	~~February 15, 2008~~	~~March 17, 2008~~		~~0.300~~
~~May 8, 2008~~	~~May 16, 2008~~	~~June 16, 2008~~		~~0.340~~
~~August 7, 2008~~	~~August 15, 2008~~	~~September 19, 2008~~		~~0.340~~
~~November 6, 2008~~	~~November 14, 2008~~	~~December 15, 2008~~		~~0.340~~
~~February 12, 2009~~	~~February 23, 2009~~	~~March 30, 2009~~		~~0.320~~	*
~~May 7, 2009~~	~~May 15, 2009~~	~~June 15, 2009~~		~~0.300~~
~~August 6, 2009~~	~~August 14, 2009~~	~~September 14, 2009~~		~~0.300~~
~~October 15, 2009~~	~~October 20, 2009~~	~~November 23, 2009~~		~~0.300~~
~~December 16, 2009~~	~~December 24, 2009~~	~~December 30, 2009~~		~~0.040~~
~~February 11, 2010~~	~~February 19, 2010~~	~~March 19, 2010~~		~~0.200~~
~~May 3, 2010~~	~~May 12, 2010~~	~~June 18, 2010~~		~~0.200~~
~~August 2, 2010~~	~~August 12, 2010~~	~~September 17, 2010~~		~~0.200~~
~~November 4, 2010~~	~~November 10, 2010~~	~~December 17, 2010~~		~~0.200~~
~~March 1, 2011~~	~~March 10, 2011~~	~~March 24, 2011~~		~~0.220~~
~~May 5, 2011~~	~~May 11, 2011~~	~~June 23, 2011~~		~~0.220~~
~~August 4, 2011~~	~~August 15, 2011~~	~~September 15, 2011~~		~~0.220~~
~~November 3, 2011~~	~~November 14, 2011~~	~~November 29, 2011~~		~~0.220~~

			$	~~6.685~~


Date Declared	Record Date	Payment Date	Amount Per Share
October 27, 2005	November 1, 2005	November 17, 2005	$	0.03
December 9, 2005	January 6, 2006	January 27, 2006		0.30
April 3, 2006	April 10, 2006	May 5, 2006		0.30
July 19, 2006	July 31, 2006	August 28, 2006		0.30
October 16, 2006	November 6, 2006	December 1, 2006		0.30
February 7, 2007	February 19, 2007	March 19, 2007		0.30
May 3, 2007	May 16, 2007	June 18, 2007		0.30
August 2, 2007	August 16, 2007	September 17, 2007		0.30
November 1, 2007	November 16, 2007	December 17, 2007		0.30
February 7, 2008	February 15, 2008	March 17, 2008		0.30
May 8, 2008	May 16, 2008	June 16, 2008		0.34
August 7, 2008	August 15, 2008	September 19, 2008		0.34
November 6, 2008	November 14, 2008	December 15, 2008		0.34
February 12, 2009	February 23, 2009	March 30, 2009		0.32	*
May 7, 2009	May 15, 2009	June 15, 2009		0.30
August 6, 2009	August 14, 2009	September 14, 2009		0.30
October 15, 2009	October 20, 2009	November 23, 2009		0.30
December 16, 2009	December 24, 2009	December 30, 2009		0.04
February 11, 2010	February 19, 2010	March 19, 2010		0.20
May 3, 2010	May 12, 2010	June 18, 2010		0.20
August 2, 2010	August 12, 2010	September 17,2010		0.20
November 4, 2010	November 10, 2010	December 17, 2010		0.20
March 1, 2011	March 10, 2011	March 24, 2011		0.22
May 5, 2011	May 11, 2011	June 23, 2011		0.22
August 4, 2011	August 15, 2011	September 15, 2011		0.22
November 3, 2011	November 14, 2011	November 29, 2011		0.22
February 27, 2012	March 12, 2012	March 15, 2012		0.23
April 30, 2012	May 18, 2012	May 25, 2012		0.24

			$	7.16

*	Dividend paid in cash and stock.

On ~~November 3, 2011,~~April 30, 2012 the Board of Directors ~~announced~~increased the quarterly dividend by $0.01, or approximately 4%, and declared a cash dividend of ~~$0.22~~$0.24 per share to be paid on ~~November 29, 2011~~May 25, 2012 to shareholders of record as of ~~November 14, 2011.~~May 18, 2012. This dividend isrepresents the Company’s ~~twenty-fifth~~twenty-seventh consecutive quarterly dividend declaration since its initial public offering, and will bring the total cumulative dividend declared to date to ~~$6.69~~$7.16 per share.

Our Board of Directors maintains a variable dividend policy with the objective of distributing four quarterly distributions in an amount that approximates 90 - 100% of our taxable quarterly income or potential annual income for a particular year. In addition, at the end of the year, we may also pay an additional special dividend or fifth dividend, such that we may distribute approximately all of our annual taxable income in the year it was earned, while maintaining the option to spill over our excess taxable income.

Distributions in excess of our current and accumulated earnings and profits would generally be treated first as a return of capital to the extent of the stockholder’s tax basis, and any remaining distributions would be treated as a capital gain. The determination of the tax attributes of our distributions is made annually as of the end of our fiscal year based upon our taxable income for the full year and distributions paid for the full year, therefore a determination made on a quarterly basis may not be representative of the tax attributes of our ~~2011~~2012 distributions to stockholders. If we had determined the tax attributes of our distributions year-to-date as of ~~September 30, 2011,~~March 31, 2012, approximately ~~97%~~98% would be from ordinary income and spillover earnings from ~~2010,~~2011, and 3%2% would be a return of capital.

Each year a statement on Form 1099-DIV identifying the source of the distribution (i.e., paid from ordinary income, paid from net capital gains on the sale of securities, and/or a return of paid-in-capital surplus which is a nontaxable distribution) is mailed to our stockholders. To the extent our taxable earnings fall below the total amount of our distributions for that fiscal year, a portion of those distributions may be deemed a tax return of capital to our stockholders.

We operate to qualify to be taxed as a RIC under the Code. Generally, a RIC is entitled to deduct dividends it pays to its shareholders from its income to determine “taxable income.” Taxable income includes our taxable interest, dividend and fee income, as well as taxable net capital gains. Taxable income generally differs from net income for financial reporting purposes due to temporary and permanent differences in the recognition of income and expenses, and generally excludes net unrealized appreciation or depreciation, as gains or losses are not included in taxable income until they are realized. In addition, gains realized for financial reporting purposes may differ from gains included in taxable income as a result of our election to recognize gains using installment sale treatment, which generally results in the deferment of gains for tax purposes until notes or other amounts, including amounts held in escrow, received as consideration from the sale of investments are collected in cash. Taxable income includes non-cash income, such as changes in accrued and reinvested interest and dividends, which includes contractual payment-in-kind interest, and the amortization of discounts and fees. Cash collections of income resulting from contractual PIK interest or the amortization of discounts and fees generally occur upon the repayment of the loans or debt securities that include such items. Non-cash taxable income is reduced by non-cash expenses, such as realized losses and depreciation and amortization expense.

We intend to distribute quarterly dividends to our stockholders. In order to avoid certain excise taxes imposed on RICs, we currently intend to distribute during each calendar year an amount at least equal to the sum of (1) 98% of our ordinary income for the calendar year, (2) 98.2% of our capital gains in excess of capital losses for the one year period ending on October 31 of the calendar year, and (3) any ordinary income and net capital gains for the preceding year that were not distributed during such year. We will not be subject to excise taxes on amounts on which we are required to pay corporate income tax (such as retained net capital gains). In order to obtain the tax benefits applicable to RICs, we will be required to distribute to our stockholders with respect to each taxable year at least 90% of our ordinary income and realized net short-term capital gains in excess of realized net long-term capital losses.

We can offer no assurance that we will achieve results that will permit the payment of any cash distributions and, if we issue senior securities, we will be prohibited from making distributions if doing so causes us to fail to maintain the asset coverage ratios stipulated by the 1940 Act or if distributions are limited by the terms of any of our borrowings. See “Regulation.”

We maintain an “opt-out” dividend reinvestment plan for our common stockholders. As a result, if we declare a dividend, cash dividends will be automatically reinvested in additional shares of our common stock unless the stockholder specifically “opts out” of the dividend reinvestment plan and chooses to receive cash dividends. See “Dividend Reinvestment Plan.”

Our ability to make distributions will be limited by the asset coverage requirements under the 1940 Act.

Critical Accounting Policies

The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements, and revenues and expenses during the period reported. On an ongoing basis, our management evaluates its estimates and assumptions, which are based on historical experience and on various other assumptions that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Changes in our estimates and assumptions could materially impact our results of operations and financial condition.

Valuation of Portfolio Investments.The most significant estimate inherent in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements is the valuation of investments and the related amounts of unrealized appreciation and depreciation of investments recorded.

Our investments are carried at fair value in accordance with the 1940 Act and Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) topic 820 Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (formerly known as SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements). At ~~September 30, 2011,~~March 31, 2012, approximately ~~83.7%~~91.0% of the Company’s total assets represented investments in portfolio companies that are valued at fair value by the Board of Directors. Value, as defined in Section 2(a)(41) of the 1940 Act, is (i) the market price for those securities for which a market quotation is readily available and (ii) for all other securities and assets, fair value is as determined in good faith by the Board of Directors. Our debt securities are primarily invested in equity sponsored technology-related companies including life science, clean technology and select lower middle market technology companies. Given the nature of lending to these types of businesses, our investments in these portfolio companies are generally considered Level 3 assets under ASC 820 because there is no known or accessible market or market indexes for these investment securities to be traded or exchanged. As such, it values substantially all of its investments at fair value as determined in good faith pursuant to a consistent valuation policy and our Board of Directors in accordance with the provisions of ASC 820 and the 1940 Act. Due to the inherent uncertainty in determining the fair value of investments that do not have a readily available market value, the fair value of our investments determined in good faith by our Board may differ significantly from the value that would have been used had a readily available market existed for such investments, and the differences could be material.

Our Board of Directors may from time to time engage an independent valuation firm to provide us with valuation assistance with respect to certain of our portfolio investments on a quarterly basis. We intend to continue to engage an independent valuation firm to provide us with assistance regarding our determination of the fair value of selected portfolio investments each quarter unless directed by the Board of Directors to cancel such valuation services. The scope of the services rendered by an independent valuation firm is at the discretion of the Board of Directors. Our Board of Directors is ultimately and solely responsible for determining the fair value of our investments in good faith.

With respect to investments for which market quotations are not readily available or when such market quotations are deemed not to represent fair value, our Board of Directors has approved a multi-step valuation process each quarter, as described below:

(1) our quarterly valuation process begins with each portfolio company or investment being initially valued by the investment professionals responsible for the portfolio investment;

(2) preliminary valuation conclusions are then documented and business based assumptions are discussed with our investment committee;

We adopted ASC 820 on January 1, 2008. ASC 820 establishes a framework for measuring the fair value of the assets and liabilities and outlines a fair value hierarchy which prioritizes the inputs used to measure fair value and the effect of fair value measures on earnings. ASC 820 also enhances disclosure requirements for fair value measurements based on the level within the hierarchy of the information used in the valuation. ASC 820 applies whenever other standards require (or permit) assets or liabilities to be measured at fair value but does not expand the use of fair value in any new circumstances. ASC 820 defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date.

We have categorized all investments recorded at fair value in accordance with ASC 820 based upon the level of judgment associated with the inputs used to measure their fair value. Hierarchical levels, defined by ASC 820 and directly related to the amount of subjectivity associated with the inputs to fair valuation of these assets and liabilities, are as follows:

In accordance with ASU 2011-04, the following table provides quantitative information about our Level 3 fair value measurements of our investments as of March 31, 2012. In addition to the techniques and inputs noted in the table below, according to our valuation policy we may also use other valuation techniques and methodologies when determining our fair value measurements. The below table is not intended to be all-inclusive, but rather provides information on the significant Level 3 inputs as they relate to our fair value measurements.

Quantitative Information about Level 3 Fair Value Measurements of Debt Investments


Investment Type - Level Three Debt Investments	Fair Value at March 31, 2012		Valuation Techniques/ Methodologies	Unobservable Input^(a)	Range
	(in thousands)
Pharmaceuticals - Debt	$	224,765	Market Comparable Companies	Market Yield Premium/(Discount)	12.2% - 20.0% (1.0%) - 2.0%
			Option Pricing Model^(b)	Average Industry Volatility^(c) Risk Free Interest Rate Estimated Time to Exit (in months)	60.92% 0.19% 12

Medical Devices - Debt		37,250	Market Comparable Companies	Market Yield	12.8%
				Premium	0.0% - 1.3%

Technology - Debt		101,114	Market Comparable Companies	Market Yield	11.1% - 14.3%
				Premium/(Discount)	(2.5%) - 1.0%

Clean Tech - Debt		79,091	Market Comparable Companies	Market Yield	12.8% - 19.5%
				Premium	0.0% - 1.0%

Lower Middle Market - Debt		172,404	Market Comparable Companies	Market Yield	11.1% - 17.6%
				Premium	0.0% - 5.0%
			Broker Quote^(d)	Price Quotes	93.0% - 99.5% of par
			Liquidation	Investment Collateral	$88 - $545
				Other Costs	$43 - $99

Total Level Three Debt Investments	$	614,624

(a)

Medical Devices, above, is comprised of debt investments in the Therapeutic, Surgical Devices, Medical Devices and Equipment and Biotechnology Tools industries in the Schedule of Investments.

Technology, above, is comprised of debt investments in the Software, Semiconductors, Internet Consumer and Business Services, Information Services, Communications and Networking industries in the Schedule of Investments.

Clean Tech, above, aligns with the Clean Tech industry in the Schedule of Investments.

(b)	An option pricing model valuation technique was used to derive the value of the conversion feature of convertible notes.

(c)	Represents the range of industry volatility used by market participants when pricing the investment.

(d)	A broker quote valuation technique was used to derive the fair value of loans which are part of a syndicated facility.

Quantitative Information about Level 3 Fair Value Measurements of Warrants and Equity Investments


Investment Type -	Fair Value at March 31, 2012		Valuation Techniques/ Methodologies	Unobservable Input^(a)	Range
	(in thousands)
Level Three Warrant and Equity Investments	$	67,567	Market Comparable Companies	EBITDA Multiple^(b)	3.90x - 43.23x
				Revenue Multiple^(b)	0.63x - 15.47x
				Discount for Lack of Marketability^(c)	10.3% - 25.8%

Warrant positions additionally subject to:			Option Pricing Model	Average Industry Volatility^(d)	41.54% - 60.92%
				Risk-Free Interest Rate	0.17% - 0.77%
				Estimated Time to Exit (in months)	9 - 48

Total Level Three Warrant and Equity Investments	$	67,567

(a)

(b)	Represents amounts used when the Company has determined that market participants would use such multiples when pricing the investments.

(c)	Represents amounts used when the Company has determined market participants would take into account these discounts when pricing the investments.

(d)	Represents the range of industry volatility used by market participants when pricing the investment.

Debt Investments

We follow the guidance set forth in ASC 820 which establishes a framework for measuring the fair value of assets and liabilities and outlines a fair value hierarchy which prioritizes the inputs used to measure fair value and the effect of fair value measures on earnings. Our debt securities are primarily invested in equity sponsored ~~technology,~~technology-related companies including life science, clean technology and ~~clean~~select lower middle market technology companies. Given the nature of lending to these types of businesses, our investments in these portfolio companies are considered Level 3 assets under ASC 820 because there is no known or accessible market or market indexes for these investment securities to be traded or exchanged.

We apply a procedure for debt investments that assumes a sale of investment in a hypothetical market to a hypothetical market participant where buyers and sellers are willing participants. The hypothetical market does not include scenarios where the underlying security was simply repaid or extinguished, but includes an exit concept. Under this process, we also evaluate the collateral for recoverability of the debt investments as well as apply all of its historical fair value analysis. We use pricing on recently issued comparable debt securities to determine the baseline hypothetical market yields as of the measurement date. We consider each portfolio company’s credit rating, security liens and other characteristics of the investment to adjust the baseline yield to derive a hypothetical yield for each investment as of the measurement date. The anticipated future cash flows from each investment are then discounted at the hypothetical yield to estimate each investment’s fair value as of the measurement date.

Our process includes, among other things, the underlying investment performance, the current portfolio company’s financial condition and market changing events that impact valuation, estimated remaining life, current market yield and interest rate spreads of similar securities as of the measurement date. If there is a significant deterioration of the credit quality of a debt investment, we may consider other factors than those a hypothetical market participant would use to estimate fair value, including the proceeds that would be received in a liquidation analysis.

We record unrealized depreciation on investments when ~~it believes~~we believe that an investment has decreased in value, including where collection of a loan is doubtful or if under the in exchange premise when the value of a debt security were to be less than amortized cost of the investment. Conversely, where appropriate, we record unrealized appreciation if we believe that the underlying portfolio company has appreciated in value and, therefore, that our investment has also appreciated in value or if under the in exchange premise the value of a debt security were to be greater than amortized cost.

When originating a debt instrument, we generally receive warrants or other equity-related securities from the borrower. We determine the cost basis of the warrants or other equity-related securities received based upon their respective fair values on the date of receipt in proportion to the total fair value of the debt and warrants or other equity-related securities received. Any resulting discount on the loan from recordation of the warrant or other equity instruments is accreted into interest income over the life of the loan.

Equity-Related Securities and Warrants

We estimate the fair value of warrants using a Black Scholes pricing model. At each reporting date, privately held warrant and ~~equity related~~equity-related securities are valued based on an analysis of various factors including, but not limited to, the portfolio company’s operating performance and financial condition and general market conditions, price to enterprise value or price to equity ratios, discounted cash flow, valuation comparisons to comparable public companies or other industry benchmarks. When an external event occurs, such as a purchase transaction, public offering, or subsequent equity sale, the pricing indicated by that external event is utilized to corroborate our valuation of the warrant and ~~equity related.~~equity-related securities. We periodically review the valuation of our portfolio companies that have not been involved in a qualifying external event to determine if the enterprise value of the portfolio company may have increased or decreased since the last valuation measurement date.

Income Recognition.

We record interest income on the accrual basis and we recognize it as earned in accordance with the contractual terms of the loan agreement to the extent that such amounts are expected to be collected. Original Issue Discount (“OID”) initially represents the value of detachable equity warrants obtained in conjunction with the acquisition of debt securities and is accreted into interest income over the term of the loan as a yield enhancement. When a loan becomes 90 days or more past due, or if management otherwise does not expect the portfolio company to be able to service its debt and other obligations, we will generally place the loan on non-accrual status

and cease recognizing interest income on that loan until all principal has been paid. Any uncollected interest related to prior periods is reversed from income in the period that collection of the interest receivable is determined to be doubtful. However, we may make exceptions to this policy if the investment has sufficient collateral value and is in the process of collection. As of ~~September 30, 2011,~~March 31, 2012, we had one portfolio company on non-accrual status with ~~a fair value~~an approximate cost of ~~zero. There were two loans on non-accrual status with~~$10.9 million and a fair value of approximately ~~$4.0~~$675,000. There was one portfolio company on non-accrual status with an approximate cost of $7.7 million and a fair value of approximately $1.0 million as of December 31, ~~2010. During the three months ended March 31, 2011 we wrote off our warrant, equity and debt investments in one of these portfolio companies for a realized loss of approximately $5.2 million.~~2011.

Paid-In-Kind and End of Term Income.

Contractual paid-in-kind (“PIK”) interest, which represents contractually deferred interest added to the loan balance that is generally due at the end of the loan term, is generally recorded on the accrual basis to the extent such amounts are expected to be collected. We will generally cease accruing PIK interest if there is insufficient value to support the accrual or we do not expect the portfolio company to be able to pay all principal and interest due. In addition, we may also be entitled to an end-of-term payment that we amortize into income over the life of the loan. To maintain our status as a RIC, PIK and end-of-term income must be paid out to stockholders in the form of dividends even though we have not yet collected the cash. Amounts necessary to pay these dividends may come from available cash or the liquidation of certain investments. ~~The Company~~We recorded approximately ~~$285,000~~$298,000 and ~~$1.4 million~~$556,000 in PIK income in the ~~three and nine-month~~three-month periods ended ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively. ~~The Company recorded approximately $552,000 and $1.7 million in the same periods ended September 30, 2010, respectively.~~

Fee Income.

Fee income, generally collected in advance, includes loan commitment and facility fees for due diligence and structuring, as well as fees for transaction services and management services rendered by us to portfolio companies and other third parties. Loan and commitment fees are amortized into income over the contractual life of the loan. Management fees are generally recognized as income when the services are rendered. Loan origination fees are capitalized and then amortized into interest income using the effective interest rate method. In certain loan arrangements, warrants or other equity interests are received from the borrower as additional origination fees.

We recognize nonrecurring fees amortized over the remaining term of the loan commencing in the quarter relating to specific loan modifications. Certain fees may still be recognized as one-time fees, including prepayment penalties, fees related to select covenant default waiver fees and acceleration of previously deferred loan fees and original issue discount (OID) related to early loan pay-off or material modification of the specific debt outstanding.

Equity Offering Expenses

Our offering costs ~~excluding underwriters’ fees,~~ are charged against the proceeds from equity offerings when received.

Debt Issuance Costs

Debt issuance costs are being amortized over the life of the related debt instrument using the straight line method, which closely approximates the effective yield method.

Stock-Based Compensation.

We have issued and may, from time to time, issue additional stock options and restricted stock to employees under our 2004 Equity Incentive Plan and Board members under our 2006 Equity Incentive Plan. We follow ASC 718, formally known as FAS 123R “Share-Based Payments” to account for stock options granted. Under ASC 718, compensation expense associated with stock-based compensation is measured at the grant date based on the fair value of the award and is ~~recognized.~~recognized over the vesting period.

Federal Income Taxes.

We intend to operate so as to qualify to be taxed as a RIC under Subchapter M of the Code and, as such, will not be subject to federal income tax on the portion of our taxable income and gains distributed to stockholders. To qualify as a RIC, we are required to distribute at least 90% of our investment company taxable income, as defined by the Code. We are subject to a non-deductible federal excise tax if we do not distribute at least 98% of our taxable income and 98.2% of our capital gain net income for each one year period ending on October 31. At December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, no excise tax was recorded. At December 31, 2008, we recorded a liability for excise tax of approximately $203,000 on income and capital gains of approximately $5.0 million which was distributed in 2009. Because federal income tax regulations differ from accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, distributions in accordance with tax regulations may differ from net investment income and realized gains recognized for financial reporting

purposes. Differences may be permanent or temporary. Permanent differences are reclassified among capital accounts in the financial statement to reflect their tax character. Temporary differences arise when certain items of income, expense, gain or loss are recognized at some time in the future. Differences in classification may also result from the treatment of short-term gains as ordinary income for tax purposes.

Recent Accounting Pronouncement

In ~~January 2010, the FASB issued ASU No. 2010-06,~~~~Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures~~(“ASU 2010-06”), which amends ASC 820 and requires additional disclosure related to recurring and nonrecurring fair value measurements with respect to transfers in and out of Levels 1 and 2 and activity in Level 3 fair value measurements. The update also clarifies existing disclosure requirements related to the level of disaggregation and disclosure about inputs and valuation techniques. ASU 2010-06 is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2009 except for disclosures related to activity in Level 3 fair value measurements which are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2010 and for interim periods within those fiscal years. The Company adopted the requirements of ASU-2010-06 in the fourth quarter of 2009 and its adoption did not have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements.

In May 2011, the ~~FASB~~Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issuedAccounting Standards Update No. 2011-04—Fair Value Measurement: Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP and IFRS, or ASU 2011-04. ASU 2011-04 clarifies the application of existing fair value measurement and disclosure requirements, changes the application of some requirements for measuring fair value and requires additional disclosure for fair value measurements. The highest and best use valuation premise is only applicable to non-financial assets. In addition, the disclosure requirements are expanded to include for fair value measurements categorized in Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy: (1) a quantitative disclosure of the unobservable inputs and assumptions used in the measurement; (2) a description of the valuation processes in place; and (3) a narrative description of the sensitivity of the fair value to changes in unobservable inputs and interrelationships between those inputs. ASU 2011-04 is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2011, for public ~~entities.~~entities and as such we have adopted this ASU beginning with our quarter ended March 31, 2012. We ~~are evaluating the impact that~~have increased our ~~adoption of this update may have~~disclosures related to Level 3 fair value measurement, in addition to other required disclosures. There were no related impacts on our financial position or results of operations.

Subsequent Events

Liquidity and Capital Resources

On April 17, 2012, we and U.S. Bank, N.A. (the “Trustee”), entered into the First Supplemental Indenture (the “First Supplemental Indenture”) to the Indenture (the “Indenture”) between us and the Trustee, dated April 17, 2012, relating to our issuance, offer and sale of $43.0 million aggregate principal amount of 7.00% senior notes due 2019 (the “2019 Notes”). The sale of the 2019 Notes generated net proceeds of approximately $41.7 million.

The 2019 Notes will mature on April 30, 2019 and may be redeemed in whole or in part at our option at any time or from time to time on or after April 30, 2015, upon not less than 30 days nor more than 60 days written notice by mail prior to the date fixed for redemption thereof, at a redemption price of 100% of the outstanding principal amount thereof plus accrued and unpaid interest payments otherwise payable for the then-current quarterly interest period accrued to but not including the date fixed for redemption. The 2019 Notes bear interest at a rate of 7.00% per year payable quarterly on January 30, April 30, July 30 and October 30 of each year, commencing on July 30, 2012.

The 2019 Notes will be our direct unsecured obligations and will rank: (i) pari passu with our other outstanding and future senior unsecured indebtedness, including without limitation, the Convertible Senior Notes; (ii) senior to any of our future indebtedness that expressly provides it is subordinated to the 2019 Notes; (iii) effectively subordinated to all our existing and future secured indebtedness (including indebtedness that is initially unsecured to which we subsequently grant security), to the extent of the value of the assets securing such indebtedness, including without limitation, borrowings under our credit facilities; (iv) structurally subordinated to all existing and future indebtedness and other obligations of any of our subsidiaries, including without limitation, the indebtedness of HT II and HT III and any borrowings under our revolving senior secured credit facilities.

The Indenture, as supplemented by the First Supplemental Indenture, contains certain covenants including covenants requiring us to comply with (regardless of whether we are subject to) the asset coverage requirements set forth in Section 18(a)(1)(A) as modified by Section 61(a)(1) of the 1940 Act, to comply with the restrictions on dividends, distributions and purchase of capital stock set forth in Section 18(a)(1)(B) as modified by Section 61(a)(1) of the 1940 Act, and to provide financial information to the holders of the 2019 Notes and the Trustee if we should no longer be subject to the reporting requirements under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. These covenants are subject to important limitations and exceptions that are described in the Indenture, as supplemented by the First Supplemental Indenture. The Indenture provides for customary events of default and further provides that the Trustee or the holders of 25% in aggregate principal amount of the outstanding 2019 Notes in a series may declare such 2019 Notes immediately due and payable upon the occurrence of any event of default after expiration of any applicable grace period.

The 2019 Notes were sold pursuant to an underwriting agreement dated April 11, 2012 among us and Stifel, Nicolaus & Company, Incorporated, as representative of the several underwriters named in the underwriting agreement. We granted the underwriters an option to purchase up to an additional $6.45 million in aggregate principal amount of the 2019 Notes to cover over-allotments, if any. The transaction closed on April 17, 2012.

Dividend Declaration

Portfolio Company Developments

In April 2012, we sold our equity investment in portfolio company Annie’s, Inc. In connection with the sale, we expect to realize a net gain of approximately $2.3-$2.4 million, representing an internal rate of return of approximately 28.0% on Hercules’ total investments in Annie’s, Inc.

In April 2012, our portfolio company NEXX Systems, Inc, reached a definitive agreement to be acquired by Tokyo Electron. In connection with the sale, we expect to realize a net gain of approximately $5.2 million for the sale of our warrant and equity investments in the second quarter.

In April 2012, we received full repayment of our $24.2 million term loan with Pacira Pharmaceuticals, Inc., our $5.6 million term loan with PolyMedix, Inc. and our $8.5 million in term loan investments with other portfolio companies.

In April 2012, we transferred the listing of our common stock from the NASDAQ Global Select Market to the New York Stock Exchange (the “NYSE”) and began trading our stock on the NYSE on April 30, 2012 under our ticker symbol “HTGC”.

Closed and Pending Commitments

As of November 3, 2011, we have closed commitments of approximately $45.0 million to new and existing portfolio companies, and funded approximately $30.0 million since the close of the third quarter. In addition, we have pending commitments (signed term sheets) of approximately $129.0 million.May 8, 2012, Hercules has:

Closed commitments of approximately $45.0 million to new and existing portfolio companies, and funded approximately $22.6 million since the close of the first quarter.

Pending commitments (signed non-binding term sheets) of approximately $129.7 million.

The table below summarizes our year-to-date closed and pending commitments as follows:

2011 Closed Commitments and Pending Commitments (in millions)

January 1 – September 30 Closed Commitments
   $ 465.0
Q4-11 Closed Commitments (as of November 3, 2011)
   $ 45.0


Total year to date 2011 Closed Commitments^(a)
   $ 510.0
Pending Commitments (as November 3, 2011)^(b)
   $ 129.0


Total year to date
   $ 639.0


Closed Commitments and Pending Commitments (in millions)
Q1-12 Closed Commitments	$	101.3
Q2-12 Closed Commitments (as of May 8, 2012)	$	45.0
Total 2012 Closed Commitments(a)	$	146.3
Pending Commitments (as of May 8, 2012)^(b)	$	129.7
Total	$	276.0

Notes:

A.a.	Not all Closed Commitments result in future cash requirements. Commitments generally fund over the two succeeding quarters from close.

B.b.	Not all ~~Pending Commitments~~pending commitments (signed non-binding term sheets) are expected to close and do not necessarily represent any future cash requirements.

~~Portfolio Company Developments~~

In October 2011, Hercules’ portfolio company LaboPharm, Inc. was acquired by Paladin Labs resulting in the full repayment of Hercules’ debt of approximately $12.0 million and the cancellation of the remaining warrants.

~~Company Developments~~

In October 2011, Hercules announced the opening of its new office in McLean, Virginia, thereby expanding to the Mid-Atlantic and South-Atlantic regions where the Company was previously under represented.

On November 2, 2011, the Company renewed and amended the Union Bank Facility. The Union Bank Facility will mature on November 2, 2014, revolving through the first 24 months with a term out provision for the remaining 12 months. The Union Bank Facility requires the payment of a non-use fee of 0.50% annually. The other terms of the Union Bank Facility generally remain unchanged, including the stated interest rate.

ITEM 3.

QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

We are subject to financial market risks, including changes in interest rates. Interest rate risk is defined as the sensitivity of our current and future earnings to interest rate volatility, variability of spread relationships, the difference in re-pricing intervals between our assets and liabilities and the effect that interest rates may have on our cash flows. Changes in the general level of interest rates can affect our net investment income, which is the difference between the interest income earned on interest earning assets and our interest expense incurred in connection with our interest bearing debt and liabilities. Changes in interest rates can also affect, among other things, our ability to acquire and originate loans and securities and the value of our investment portfolio.

As of ~~September 30, 2011,~~March 31, 2012, approximately 91.1% of our portfolio loans were at variable rates or variable rates with a floor and 8.9% of our loans were at fixed rates. Over time additional investments may be at variable rates. We do not currently engage in any hedging activities. However, we may, in the future, hedge against interest rate fluctuations by using standard hedging instruments such as futures, options, and forward contracts. While hedging activities may insulate us against changes in interest rates, they may also limit our ability to participate in the benefits of lower interest rates with respect to our borrowed funds and higher interest rates with respect to our portfolio of investments. Interest rates on our borrowings are based primarily on LIBOR. Borrowings under our SBA program are fixed at the ten year treasury rate every March and September for borrowings of the preceding six months. Borrowings under the program are charged interest based on ten year treasury rates plus a spread and the rates are generally set for a pool of debentures issued by the SBA in six-month periods. The rates of borrowings under the various draws from the SBA beginning in April 2007 and set semiannually in March and September range from ~~2.88%~~2.77% to 5.73%. In addition, the SBA charges a fee that is set annually, depending on the Federal fiscal year the leverage commitment was delegated by the SBA, regardless of the date that the leverage was drawn by the SBIC. The annual ~~fee related to HT III debentures that pooled on September 21, 2011 was 0.285%. The annual~~ fees related to HT II debentures that pooled on September 22, 2010 were 0.406% and 0.285%, depending upon the year in which the underlying commitment was ~~closed in.~~closed. The annual fees related to HT III debentures that pooled on March 21, 2012 were 0.285% and 0.515% depending upon the year in which the underlying commitment was closed. The annual fees on other debentures have been set at 0.906%. The average amount of debentures outstanding for the quarter ended ~~September 30, 2011~~March 31, 2012 for HT II was approximately ~~$125.0~~$115.4 million with an average interest rate of approximately ~~5.0%, and~~6.0%. The average amount of debentures outstanding for the quarter ended March 31, 2012 for HT III was approximately ~~$63.75~~$100.0 million with an average interest rate of approximately ~~3.5%~~2.9%. Interest is payable semiannually and there are no principal payments required on these issues prior to maturity. Debentures under the SBA generally mature ten years after being borrowed. Based on the initial draw down date of April 2007, the initial maturity of SBA debentures will occur in April 2017.

Borrowings under the Wells Facility will generally bear interest at a rate per annum equal to LIBOR plus 3.50%, with a floor of ~~5.0%.~~5.00% and an advance rate of 50% against eligible loans. The Wells Facility is ~~collateralized~~secured by ~~debt investment in our portfolio companies, and includes an advance rate equal to 50% of eligible~~ loans ~~placed~~ in the ~~collateral pool. The Wells Facility generally requires payment of interest on a monthly basis.~~borrowing base. The Wells Facility requires the monthly payment of a non-use fee of 0.3% for each payment date on or before September 1, 2011. ~~From September 1, 2011 through September 30, 2011, this non-use fee was 0.75%.~~ The monthly payment of a non-use fee thereafter shall depend on the average balance that was outstanding on a scale between 0.0% and 0.75%.~~All~~ For the three-month period ended March 31, 2012, this non-use fee was approximately $137,000. On June 20, 2011 we paid an additional $1.1 million in structuring fees in connection with the Wells Facility which is being amortized through June 2014. In January 2012, we repaid the entire principal balance outstanding ~~principal is due upon maturity. There~~as of December 31, 2011 under the Wells Facility, approximately $10.2 million. At March 31, 2012, there were no borrowings outstanding under ~~this facility at September 30, 2011. The facility expires in June 2014.~~the Wells Facility.

Borrowings under the Union Bank Facility will generally bear interest at a rate per annum equal to LIBOR plus 2.25% with a floor of 4.0%. The Union Bank Facility required the payment of an unused fee of ~~0.25%~~0.50% annually. For the three-month period ended March 31, 2012, this non-use fee was approximately $70,000. The Union Bank Facility is collateralized by debt investments in our portfolio companies, and includes an advance rate equal to 50% of eligible loans placed in the collateral pool. The Union Bank Facility generally requires payment of interest on a monthly basis. All outstanding principal is due upon maturity. There were no outstanding borrowings under this facility at ~~September 30, 2011. In June 2011, the maturity date under the credit facility was extended from July~~March 31, ~~2011 to December 31, 2011, subject to the same terms and conditions.~~2012. On November 2, 2011, we renewed and amended the Union Bank Facility. ~~The Union Bank Facility requires the payment of a non-use fee of 0.50% annually.~~ The other terms of the Union Bank Facility generally remain unchanged, including the stated interest rate. The Union Bank Facility will mature on November 2, 2014, revolving through the first 24 months with a term out provision for the remaining 12 months.

Borrowings under the Convertible Senior Notes mature on April 15, 2016 (the “Maturity Date”), unless previously converted or repurchased in accordance with their terms. The Convertible Senior Notes bear interest at a rate of 6.00% per year payable semiannually in arrears on April 15 and October 15 of each year, commencing on October 15, 2011. The Convertible Senior Notes are our senior unsecured obligations and rank senior in right of payment to the our existing and future indebtedness that is expressly subordinated in right of payment to the Convertible Senior Notes; equal in right of payment to our existing and future unsecured indebtedness that is not so subordinated; effectively junior in right of payment to any of our secured indebtedness (including unsecured indebtedness that we later secure) to the extent of the value of the assets securing such indebtedness; and structurally junior to all existing and future indebtedness (including trade payables) incurred by our subsidiaries, financing vehicles or similar facilities.

Because we currently borrow, and plan to borrow in the future, money to make investments, our net investment income is dependent upon the difference between the rate at which we borrow funds and the rate at which we invest the funds borrowed. Accordingly, there can be no assurance that a significant change in market interest rates will not have a material adverse effect on our net investment income. In periods of rising interest rates, our cost of funds would increase, which could reduce our net investment income if there is not a corresponding increase in interest income generated by variable rate assets in our investment portfolio.

ITEM 4.

CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Our chief executive and chief financial officers, under the supervision and with the participation of our management, conducted an evaluation of our disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. As of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report ~~the Company carried out an evaluation, under the supervision~~on Form 10-Q, our chief executive and ~~with the participation of its management, including its Chief Executive Officer (principal executive officer) and Chief Financial Officer (principal~~chief financial officer), of the effectiveness of the design and operation of these disclosure controls and procedures, as such term is defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e). Based on this evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer (principal executive officer) and Chief Financial Officer (principal financial officer)officers have concluded that our ~~current~~ disclosure controls and procedures were ~~not~~ effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in ~~timely alerting them~~reports that it files or submits under the Securities Exchange Act of ~~material~~1934 is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in SEC rules and forms, and that information ~~relating to the Company that is~~ required to be disclosed by us in the reports ~~we file~~that it files or ~~submit~~submits under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is accumulated and communicated to the company’s management, including its chief executive and chief financial officers, as ~~of September 30, 2011 because of the continuing remediation efforts discussed below.~~appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

~~As described~~There have been no other changes in ~~Item 9A~~our internal control over financing reporting, as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) of the ~~Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 and in~~Securities Exchange Act of 1934, that occurred during the Company’s ~~Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for~~most recently completed fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the three months ended March 31, 2011, management identified remedial steps that were implemented with respect to disclosed material weaknesses. In light of these material weaknesses, the Company refined its procedures to ensure its financial statements were prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. The status of the remediation efforts, as discussed below, was regularly reviewed with management and the Company’s Audit Committee of the Board of Directors. The Audit Committee was advised of issues encountered and key decisions reached by management relating to the remediation efforts. Accordingly, management believes that the financial statements included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q present fairly in all material respects the Company’s financial condition, results of operations and cash flows for the periods presented.

During the three month period ended December 31, 2010, and in connection with the year-end audit process, the Company corrected the valuation process to refine its application of ASC 820. The Company applied a new procedure that assumes a sale of an investment in a hypothetical market to a hypothetical market participant where buyers and sellers are willing participants. The hypothetical market does not include scenarios where the underlying security was simply repaid or extinguished, but includes an exit concept. Under the new process, the Company has continued to evaluate the collateral for recoverability of the debt investments as well as apply all of its historical fair value analysis. The Company uses pricing on recently issued comparable debt securities to determine the baseline hypothetical market yields as of the measurement date. The Company considers each portfolio company’s credit rating, security liens and other characteristics of the investment to adjust the baseline yield to derive a hypothetical yield for each investment. The anticipated future cash flows from each investment are then discounted at the hypothetical yield to estimate each investment’s fair value as of the measurement date. The Company has completed its evaluation and testing of these additional processes. During the three months ended March 31, 2011, management evaluated the remedial action, assessed the operating effectiveness of the remediated controls and concluded that it has remediated the material weakness described above.

~~In connection with the preparation of the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements for the three-month period ended March 31, 2011, the Company identified a material weakness in its~~ internal control over financial reporting. A material weakness is a deficiency, or combination of control deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the registrant’s annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. In particular, management became aware of matters where existing controls did not operate effectively to detect manual input errors in calculations used to derive the fair value of some investment portfolio holdings as of the measurement date, thereby impacting reported amounts with respect to investments and net increase (decrease) in unrealized appreciation on investments. This control deficiency could result in misstatements of the aforementioned accounts and disclosures that would result in a material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements that would not be prevented or detected. Because of this material weakness, management concluded that the Company did not maintain effective control over financial reporting as of March 31, 2011. The Company designed and implemented its remediation efforts, as outlined below, to address the material weakness identified as of March 31, 2011 and to strengthen its internal control over financial reporting. Beginning in the second quarter of 2011, the Company has implemented the following remediation steps to address the material weakness as it relates to manual input errors in calculations used and to improve its internal control over financial reporting:

~~adding additional layers of review to ensure accuracy, existence and completeness of the number of equity security holdings as of the measurement date;~~

~~adding additional review steps, particularly surrounding any manually input data, in the calculations used to support the fair value of investments as of the measurement date; and~~

~~seeking to recruit additional experienced professionals to augment and upgrade its financial staff to address issues of timeliness and completeness in financial reporting.~~

As of September 30, 2011, management believes it has placed in operation controls to address the material weakness, however given the timing of certain remediation activities there was not sufficient evidence to conclude upon their sustained effectiveness. As a result, during 2011, management will continue to monitor and test the controls that have been implemented to ensure sustained effectiveness and will further remediate should any evidence of ineffectiveness be found.

The Audit Committee has directed management to monitor and test the controls implemented and develop additional controls should any of these new controls require further enhancement. In addition, under the direction of the Audit Committee, management will continue to review and make necessary changes to the overall design of the Company’s internal control environment, as well as policies and procedures to improve the overall effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting.

Management believes the measures described above and others that will be implemented as necessary will remediate the control deficiencies the Company has identified and strengthen its internal control over financial reporting. Management is committed to continuous improvement of the Company’s internal control processes and will continue to diligently review the Company’s financial reporting controls and procedures. As management continues to evaluate and work to improve internal control over financial reporting, the Company may determine to take additional measures to address control deficiencies or to determine to modify, or in appropriate circumstances not to complete, certain of the remediation measures described above.

PART II: OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1.

LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

At ~~September 30, 2011,~~March 31, 2012, we were not a party to any legal proceedings. However, from time to time, we may be party to certain legal proceedings incidental to the normal course of our business including the enforcement of our rights under contracts with our portfolio companies. While the outcome of these legal proceedings cannot at this time be predicted, ~~with certainty,~~ we do not expect that these proceedings will have a material effect upon our financial condition or results of operations and cash flows.

ITEM 1A.

RISK FACTORS

In addition to the risks discussed below, important risk factors that could cause results or events to differ from current expectations are described in Part I, Item 1A “Risk Factors” of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, ~~2010.~~

~~We have identified a material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting, and our business and stock price may be adversely affected if we have not adequately addressed the weakness.~~

As a result of our evaluation of our internal control over financial reporting for the year ended December 31, 2010, management identified a material weakness related to our valuation process specifically involving debt investments. We have corrected the valuation process to refine our application of ASC 820 and believe that our audited consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2010 reflect the fair value of our debt investments in accordance with ASC 820 using the new valuation procedure. During the year ended December 31, 2010, we recognized additional unrealized depreciation of $803,000, which is not material to the 2010 consolidated financial statements. Management has evaluated the remedial action, assessed the operating effectiveness of the remediated controls and concluded that it has remediated the material weakness described above.

In connection with the preparation of our Consolidated Financial Statements for the three-month period ended March 31, 2011, we identified a material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting related to manual input errors in calculations used to derive the fair value of some investment portfolio holdings as of the measurement date, thereby impacting reported amounts with respect to investments and net increase (decrease) in unrealized appreciation on investments. Our consolidated financial statements for the quarter ended March 31, 2011 reflect the fair value of our investments and continue to take remediation steps to enhance the internal control procedures in order to effectively remediate the deficiencies in our internal control processes related to such errors.

If we cannot produce reliable financial reports, investors could lose confidence in our reported financial information, the market price of our stock and the Convertible Senior Notes could decline significantly, we may be unable to obtain additional financing to operate and expand our business, and our business and financial condition could be harmed. See Item 4—Controls and Procedures.2011.

It is likely that the terms of any long-term or revolving credit or warehouse facility we may enter into in the future could constrain our ability to grow our business.

OnIn August ~~25,~~ 2008, we ~~through a special purpose wholly-owned subsidiary,~~ entered into ~~a two-year revolving~~the Wells Facility, which we renewed on June 20, 2011. Under this three-year senior secured ~~credit~~ facility, ~~with an optional one-year extension with initial commitments of $50.0 million at closing with~~ Wells Fargo Capital Finance ~~(the “Wells Facility”).~~has made commitments of $75.0 million. The Wells Facility has the capacity to increase to $300.0 million if additional lenders are added to the lending syndicate. As of September 30, 2011, we had zero outstanding borrowings under the Wells Facility.

~~On June 20, 2011, we renewed the Wells Facility. The revolving credit facility will expire on June 20, 2014. The new~~ facility contains an accordion feature, in which we can increase the credit line up to an aggregate of $300.0 million, funded by additional lenders and with the agreement of Wells Fargo Capital Finance and subject to other customary conditions. ~~There~~We expect to continue discussions with various other potential lenders to join the new facility; however, there can be no assurances that additional lenders will join the ~~new credit facility. This new arrangement replaced the previous $300.0 million~~ Wells ~~Facility, under which Wells Fargo Capital Finance had committed $50.0 million in capital. Under the new three-year senior secured facility,~~

Facility.

~~Wells Fargo Capital Finance has a commitment of $75.0 million.~~ Borrowings under the Wells Facility will generally bear interest at a rate per annum equal to LIBOR plus 3.50%, with a floor of 5.00%. and an advance rate of 50% against eligible loans. The Wells Facility is secured by loans in the borrowing base. The Wells Facility requires the monthly payment of a ~~monthly~~ non-use fee of 0.3% for each payment date on or before September 1, 2011. The monthly payment of a non-use fee thereafter shall depend on the average balance that was outstanding on a scale between 0.0% and ~~has~~0.75%. For the three-month period ended March 31, 2012, this non-use fee was approximately $137,000. On June 20, 2011 we paid an ~~advance rate equal to 50%~~additional $1.1 million in structuring fees in connection with the Wells Facility which is being amortized through June 2014. In January 2012, we repaid the entire principal balance outstanding as of ~~eligible loans placed in~~December 31, 2011 under the ~~collateral pool.~~ Wells Facility of approximately $10.2 million. At March 31, 2012, there were no borrowings outstanding under the Wells Facility.

The Wells Facility ~~generally requires~~includes various financial and operating covenants applicable to us and our subsidiaries, in addition to those applicable to Hercules Funding II, LLC. These covenants require us to maintain certain financial ratios and a minimum tangible net worth in an amount, when added to outstanding subordinated indebtedness, that is in excess of $314.0 million plus 90% of the cumulative amount of equity raised after March 31, 2011. In addition, the tangible net worth covenant will increase by 90 cents on the dollar for every dollar of equity capital subsequently raised by us. As of March 31, 2012, the minimum tangible net worth covenant has increased to $357.2 million as a result of the January 2012 follow-on public offering of 5.0 million shares of common stock for proceeds of approximately $48.05 million. The Wells Facility provides for customary events of default, including, but not limited to, payment defaults, breach of ~~interest on a monthly basis. All outstanding principal is due upon maturity.~~representations or covenants, bankruptcy events and change of control.

On February 10, 2010, we entered ~~a $20.0 million one-year revolving senior secured credit facility with~~into the Union Bank ~~(the “Union~~Facility. On November 2, 2011, we renewed and amended the Union Bank ~~Facility”).~~ Facility and added a new lender under the Union Bank Facility. Union Bank and RBC Capital Markets have made commitments of $30.0 million and $25.0 million, respectively. The Union Bank Facility contains an accordion feature, in which we can increase the credit line up to an aggregate of $150.0 million, funded by additional lenders and with the agreement of Union Bank and subject to other customary conditions. We expect to continue discussions with various other potential lenders to join the new facility; however, there can be no assurances that additional lenders will join the Union Bank Facility. At March 31, 2012, we had no borrowings outstanding under the Union Bank Facility.

Borrowings under the Union Bank Facility will generally bear interest at a rate per annum equal to LIBOR plus 2.25% with a floor of 4.0%~~, an advance rate of 50% against eligible loans, and secured by loans in~~. At March 31, 2012, there were no borrowings outstanding under the ~~borrowing base.~~Union Bank Facility. The Union Bank Facility ~~required~~requires the payment of a non-use fee of ~~0.25%~~0.50% annually. For the three-month period ended March 31, 2012, this non-use fee was approximately $70,000. The Union Bank Facility is collateralized by debt investments in our portfolio companies, and includes an advance rate equal to 50.0% of eligible loans placed in the collateral pool. The Union Bank Facility generally requires payment of interest on a monthly basis. All outstanding principal is due upon maturity. In February 2011, the maturity date of the facility was extended from May 1, 2011 to July 31, 2011. Union Bank Facility provides for customary events of default, including, but not limited to, payment defaults, breach of representations or covenants, bankruptcy events and change of control. We were in compliance with all covenants at September 30, 2011.

The current lenders under the Wells Facility and the Union Bank Facility have, and any future lender or lenders will have, fixed dollar claims on our assets that are senior to the claims of our stockholders and, thus, will have a preference over our stockholders with respect to our assets in the collateral pool. In addition, we may grant a security interest in our assets in connection with any such borrowing. These facilities contain customary default provisions such as a minimum net worth amount, a profitability test, and a restriction on changing our business and loan quality standards. In addition, such facilities require or are expected to require the repayment of all outstanding debt on the maturity which may disrupt our business and potentially, the business of our portfolio companies that are financed through the facilities. An event of default under these facilities would likely result, among other things, in termination of the availability of further funds under that facility and an accelerated maturity date for all amounts outstanding under the facility, which would likely disrupt our business and, potentially, the business of the portfolio companies whose loans we financed through the facility. This could reduce our revenues and, by delaying any cash payment allowed to us under our facility until the lender has been paid in full, reduce our liquidity and cash flow and impair our ability to grow our business and maintain our status as a RIC.

The terms of future available financing may place limits on our financial and operating flexibility. If we are unable to obtain sufficient capital in the future, we may:

be forced to reduce or discontinue our operations;

not be able to expand or acquire complementary businesses; and

not be able to develop new services or otherwise respond to changing business conditions or competitive pressures.

There is no assurance that HT II or HT III will be able to draw up to the maximum limit available under the SBIC program.

On September 27, 2006, HT II received a license to operate as a SBIC under the SBIC program and is able to borrow funds from the SBA against eligible investments and additional contributions to regulatory capital. As of ~~September 30, 2011,~~March 31, 2012, HT II had the potential to borrow up to $125.0 million of SBA-guaranteed debentures under the SBIC program. With our net investment of $75.0 million in HT II as of ~~September 30, 2011,~~March 31, 2012, HT II has the capacity to issue a total of $125.0 million of SBA guaranteed debentures, subject to SBA approval, of which ~~$125.0~~$100.7 million is outstanding as of ~~September 30, 2011.~~March 31, 2012.

On May 26, 2010, HT III received a license to operate as a SBIC under the SBIC program and is able to borrow funds from the SBA against eligible investments and additional contributions to regulatory capital. As of ~~September 30, 2011,~~March 31, 2012, HT III had the potential to borrow up to $100.0 million of SBA-guaranteed debentures under the SBIC program. With our net investment of $50.0 million in HT III as of ~~September 30, 2011,~~March 31, 2012, HT III has the capacity to issue a total of $100.0 million of SBA guaranteed debentures, subject to SBA approval, of which ~~$63.75~~$100.0 million was outstanding as of ~~September 30, 2011.~~March 31, 2012.

As of ~~September 30, 2011,~~March 31, 2012, there was ~~$188.75~~$200.7 million principal amount of indebtedness outstanding incurred by our SBIC subsidiaries. Access to the remaining leverage is subject to SBA approval and compliance with SBA regulations.

There is no assurance that HT II or HT III will be able to draw up to the maximum limit available under the SBIC program.

In addition to regulatory restrictions that restrict our ability to raise capital, the Wells Facility, the Union Bank Facility and the Convertible Senior Notes contain various covenants which, if not complied with, could accelerate repayment under the facility or require us to repurchase the Convertible Senior Notes, thereby materially and adversely affecting our liquidity, financial condition, results of operations and ability to pay dividends.

The credit agreements governing the Wells Facility and the Union Bank Facility and the Convertible Senior Notes require us to comply with certain financial and operational covenants. These covenants require us to, among other things, maintain certain financial ratios, including asset coverage, debt to equity and interest coverage. Our ability to continue to comply with these covenants in the future depends on many factors, some of which are beyond our control. There are no assurances that we will be able to comply with these covenants. Failure to comply with these covenants would result in a default which, if we were unable to obtain a waiver from the lenders under the Wells Facility and the Union Bank facility or the trustee or holders under the Convertible Senior Notes, could accelerate repayment under the facilities or the Convertible Senior Notes and thereby have a material adverse impact on our liquidity, financial condition, results of operations and ability to pay dividends. In addition, holders of the Convertible Senior Notes will have the right to require us to repurchase the Convertible Senior Notes upon the occurrence of a fundamental change at a repurchase price equal to 100% of their principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any. We may not have enough available cash or be able to obtain financing at the time we are required to make repurchases. See “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Results of Operations and Financial Condition—Borrowings.”

~~Our investments in the life science industry are subject~~Depending on funding requirements, we may need to ~~extensive government regulation and certain other risks particular~~raise additional capital to ~~that industry.~~meet our unfunded commitments either through equity offerings or through additional borrowings.

We have invested and plan to continue investing in companies in the life science industry that are subject to extensive regulation by the Food and Drug Administration and to a lesser extent, other federal and state agencies. If anyAs of March 31, 2012, we had unfunded commitments of approximately $125.4 million. Approximately $40.1 million of these unfunded debt commitments are dependent upon the portfolio ~~companies fail to comply with applicable regulations, they could~~company reaching certain milestones before the debt commitment becomes available. These commitments will be subject to ~~significant penalties~~the same underwriting and ~~claims that could materially and adversely affect their operations. Portfolio companies that produce medical devices or drugs are subject to~~ongoing portfolio maintenance. Since these commitments may expire without being drawn upon, the ~~expense, delay and uncertainty~~total commitment amount does not necessarily represent future cash requirements. Closed commitments generally fund 70-80% of the ~~regulatory approval process for their products and, even if approved, these products may not be accepted~~committed amount in ~~the marketplace. In addition, new laws, regulations or judicial interpretations of existing laws and regulations might adversely affect a portfolio company in this industry. Portfolio companies in~~aggregate over the life ~~science industry may also have a limited number~~ of ~~suppliers of necessary components or a limited number of manufacturers for their products, and therefore face a risk of disruption~~the commitment. We intend to their manufacturing process if they are unable to find alternative suppliers when needed. Any of these factors could materially and adversely affect the operations of a portfolio company in this industry and, in turn, impair our ability to timely collect principal and interest payments owed to us.

~~Our investments in the clean technology industry are subject to many risks, including volatility, intense competition, shortened product life cycles and periodic downturns.~~

Our investments in clean technology companies are subject to substantial operational risks, such as failed drilling or well development, unscheduled outages, underestimated cost projections, unanticipated operation and maintenance expenses, failure to obtain the necessary permits to operate and failure of third-party contractors (~~e.g.~~~~, energy producers and shippers) to perform their contractual obligations. In addition, energy companies employ a variety of means of increasing~~use cash flow ~~including increasing utilization of existing facilities, expanding operations through new construction or acquisitions, or securing additional long-term contracts. Thus, some energy companies may~~from normal and early principal repayments, SBA debentures, our Wells Facility, our Union Bank Facility and proceeds from Convertible Senior Notes to fund these commitments. However, there can be ~~subject~~no assurance that we will have sufficient capital available to construction risk, acquisition risk or other risks arising from their specific business strategies. Furthermore, production levels for wind, solar and other renewable energies may be dependent upon adequate wind, sunlight, or biogas production, which can vary from period to period, resulting in volatility in production levels and profitability. In addition, any clean technology have narrow product lines and small market shares, which tend to render them more vulnerable to competitors’ actions and market conditions,fund these commitments as well as to general economic downturns. The revenues, income (or losses) and valuations of clean technology companies can and often do fluctuate suddenly and dramatically and the markets in which clean technology companies operate are generally characterized by abrupt business cycles and intense competition. Demand for clean technology and renewable energy is also influenced by the available supply and prices for other energy products, such as coal, oil and natural gases. A change in prices in these energy products could reduce demand for alternative energy. There is particular uncertainty about whether agreements providing incentives for reductions in greenhouse gas emissions, such as the Kyoto Protocol, will continue and whether countries around the world will enact or maintain legislation that provides incentives for reductions in greenhouse gas emissions, without which such investments in clean technology dependent portfolio companies may not be economical or financing for such projects may become unavailable. As a result, these portfolio company investments face considerable risk, including the risk that favorable regulatory regimes expire or are adversely modified. This could, in turn, materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.they come due.

Our financial results could be negatively affected if a significant portfolio investment fails to perform as expected.

Our total investment in companies may be significant individually or in the aggregate. As a result, if a significant investment in one or more companies fails to perform as expected, our financial results could be more negatively affected and the magnitude of the

loss could be more significant than if we had made smaller investments in more companies. The following table shows the fair value of the totals of investments held in portfolio companies at ~~September 30, 2011~~March 31, 2012 that represent greater than 5% of net assets:


	September 30, 2011					March 31, 2012
(in thousands)	Fair Value		Percentage of Net Assets			Fair Value		Percentage of Net Assets
BrightSource Energy, Inc.						$	36,189		7.5	%
Aveo Pharmaceuticals, Inc.	$	29,887		7.1	%	$	29,378		6.1	%
Women’s Marketing, Inc.	$	29,405		7.0	%	$	29,033		6.0	%
Box.net, Inc.						$	28,699		5.9	%
Tectura Corporation	$	26,574		6.3	%	$	26,544		5.5	%
Pacira Pharmaceuticals, Inc	$	26,264		6.2	%	$	26,140		5.4	%
Anthera Pharmaceuticals, Inc	$	25,705		6.1	%	$	24,895		5.1	%
Brightsource Energy, Inc	$	25,261		6.0	%
Revance Therapeutics, Inc	$	21,814		5.2	%

Brightsource Energy, Inc. designs, develops and sells solar thermal power systems that deliver reliable, clean energy to utilities and industrial companies.

Aveo Pharmaceuticals, Inc. is a biopharmaceutical company dedicated to the discovery and development of new, targeted cancer therapeutics.

Women’s Marketing, Inc. is a media solutions company, delivering premium media at value pricing across all platforms.

Box.Net, Inc. is an online storage and sharing service that gives users access to their files from anywhere.

Tectura Corporation is an IT services firm that specializes in Microsoft Business Solutions applications.

Pacira Pharmaceuticals, Inc. is an emerging specialty pharmaceutical company focused on the development, commercialization and manufacture of new pharmaceutical products.

Anthera Pharmaceuticals, Inc. is a biopharmaceutical company focused on developing and commercializing products to treat serious diseases, including cardiovascular and autoimmune diseases.

~~Brightsource Energy, Inc. designs, develops and sells solar thermal power systems that deliver reliable, clean energy to utilities and industrial companies.~~

Revance Therapeutics, Inc. is a privately held biopharmaceutical company developing products that will change the way that drugs are delivered by carrying active levels of drug across the skin to deliver at specific and targeted depths.

~~Tectura Corporation is an IT services firm that specializes in Microsoft Business Solutions applications.~~

Our financial results could be negatively affected if these portfolio companies or any of our other significant portfolio companies encounter financial difficulty and fail to repay their obligations or to perform as expected.

Economic downturns or recessions could impair the value of the collateral for our loans to our portfolio companies increase our funding costs, limit our access to the credit and capital markets, impair the ability of a portfolio company to satisfy covenants imposed by its lenders and consequently increase the possibility of an adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Many of our portfolio companies are susceptible to economic recessions and may be unable to repay our loans during such periods. Therefore, our non-performing assets are likely to increase and the value of our portfolio is likely to decrease during such periods. Adverse economic conditions may also decrease the value of collateral securing some of our loans and the value of our equity investments. In particular, intellectual property owned or controlled by our portfolio companies may constitute an important portion of the value of the collateral of our loans to our portfolio companies. Adverse economic conditions may decrease the demand for our portfolio companies’ intellectual property and consequently its value in the event of a bankruptcy or required sale through a foreclosure proceeding. As a result, our ability to fully recover the amounts owed to us under the terms of the loans may be impaired by such events.

Economic slowdowns or recessions could lead to financial losses in our portfolio and a decrease in revenues, net income and assets. Unfavorable economic conditions also could increase our funding costs, limit our access to the capital markets or result in a decision by lenders not to extend credit to us. A portfolio company’s failure to satisfy financial or operating covenants imposed by us or other lenders could lead to defaults and, potentially, termination of the portfolio company’s loans and foreclosure on its secured assets, which could trigger cross-defaults under other agreements and jeopardize the portfolio company’s ability to meet its obligations under the debt securities that we hold. We may incur expenses to the extent necessary to seek recovery upon default or to negotiate new terms with a defaulting portfolio company.

Beginning in the fall of 2008, the global economy entered a financial crisis and recession. Volatile capital and credit markets, declining business and consumer confidence and increased unemployment precipitated a continuing economic slowdown. Although there have been signs of recovery in many regions, economic weakness could continue or worsen. For example, the current U.S. debt ceiling and budget deficit concerns, together with signs of deteriorating sovereign debt conditions in Europe, have increased the possibility of credit-rating downgrades and economic slowdowns. Although U.S. lawmakers passed legislation to raise the federal debt ceiling, Standard & Poor’s Ratings Services lowered its long-term sovereign credit rating on the United States from “AAA” to “AA+” on August 5, 2011. The impact of this or any further downgrades to the U.S. government’s sovereign credit rating, or its perceived creditworthiness, and the impact of the current crisis in Europe with respect to the ability of certain European Union countries to continue to service their sovereign debt obligations is inherently unpredictable and could adversely effect the U.S. and global financial markets and economic conditions. There can be no assurance that governmental or other measures to aid economic recovery will be effective. Continued adverse economic conditions could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS

Not Applicable

ITEM 3.

DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES

Not Applicable

ITEM 4.

~~RESERVED~~MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES

Not Applicable

ITEM 5.

OTHER INFORMATION

Not Applicable

ITEM 6.

EXHIBITS


Exhibit Number		Description
10.1		First Amendment to Amended and Restated Loan and Security Agreement, dated March 30, 2012, by and among the Company and Union Bank, N.A.*

10.2		Indenture, dated March 6, 2012 between the Company and U.S. Bank National Association (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit (d)(7) of the Company’s Post-Effective Amendment No. 1 on Form N-2, File No. 333-179431, filed on April 17, 2012).

10.3		First Supplemental Indenture, dated April 17, 2012 between the Company and U.S. Bank, National Association (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit (d)(8) of the Company’s Post-Effective Amendment No. 1 on Form N-2, File No. 333-179431, filed on April 17, 2012).

31.1		Chief Executive Officer Certification Pursuant to ~~Rule 13a-14 of the Securities~~ Exchange Act ~~of 1934,~~Rule 13a-14(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of ~~2002~~2002*

31.2		Chief Financial Officer Certification Pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a-14 ~~of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,~~(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of ~~2002~~2002*

32.1		Chief Executive Officer Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, ~~Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code,~~ as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of ~~2002~~2002*

32.2		Chief Financial Officer Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, ~~Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code,~~ as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of ~~2002~~2002*

*	Filed herewith.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.


				HERCULES TECHNOLOGY GROWTH CAPITAL, INC. (Registrant)

Dated: ~~November 3, 2011~~May 8, 2012				/S/ MANUEL A. HENRIQUEZ
				Manuel A. Henriquez
				Chairman, President, and Chief Executive Officer

Dated: ~~November 3, 2011~~May 8, 2012				/S/ JESSICA BARON
				Jessica Baron
				~~Interim~~ Chief Financial Officer

EXHIBIT INDEX


Exhibit Number		Description
10.1		First Amendment to Amended and Restated Loan and Security Agreement, dated March 30, 2012, by and among the Company and Union Bank, N.A.*

31.1		Chief Executive Officer Certification Pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a-14 ~~of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,~~(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of ~~2002~~2002*

31.2		Chief Financial Officer Certification Pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a-14 ~~of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,~~(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of ~~2002~~2002*

32.1		Chief Executive Officer Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, ~~Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code,~~ as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of ~~2002~~2002*

32.2		Chief Financial Officer Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, ~~Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code,~~ as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of ~~2002~~2002*

*	Filed herewith.

7987


(in thousands)	Balance, January 1, 2010		Net Realized Gains (losses)⁽¹⁾			Net change in unrealized appreciation or depreciation⁽²⁾			Purchases, sales, repayments, and exit, net			Transfer in & out of Level 3			Balances, December 31, 2010
Senior Debt	$	319,129	$	(12,835	)	$	(3,076	)	$	98,058		$	(7,078	)	$	394,198
Subordinated Debt		—		—			—			7,420			—			7,420
Senior Debt-Second Lien		6,005		—			—��			(6,005	)		—			—
Preferred Stock		22,875		(1,250	)		(995	)		2,603			1,374			24,607
Common Stock		1,773		(15,037	)		(743	)		15,037			—			1,030
Warrants		11,076		(1,225	)		568			8,650			(1,668	)		17,401

Total	$	360,858	$	(30,347	)	$	(4,246	)	$	125,763		$	(7,372	)	$	444,656


(in thousands)	Three months ended September 30, 2011										Nine months ended September 30, 2011
Portfolio Company	Type	Fair Value at September 30, 2011		Investment Income		Unrealized (Depreciation ) /Appreciation			Realized Gain /(Loss)		Investment Income		Unrealized (Depreciation) /Appreciation			Reversal of Unrealized (Depreciation) /Appreciation		Realized Gain/ (Loss)
MaxVision Holding, LLC.	Control	$	2,983	$	10	$	14		$	—	$	861	$	(3,546	)		—	$	—
E-Band Communiations, Corp.	Non-Controlled Affiliate		—		5		(53	)		—		9		(3,425	)		—		—

Total		$	2,983	$	15	$	(39	)	$	—	$	870	$	(6,971	)	$	—	$	—

(in thousands)	Three months ended September 30, 2010										Nine months ended September 30, 2010
Portfolio Company	Type	Fair Value at September 30, 2011		Investment Income		Unrealized (Depreciation) /Appreciation			Realized Gain /(Loss)		Investment Income		Unrealized (Depreciation) /Appreciation			Reversal of Unrealized (Depreciation) /Appreciation		Realized Gain /(Loss)
InfoLogix, Inc.	Control	$	33,935	$	796	$	(4,266	)	$	—	$	2,448	$	(1,419	)	$	128	$	2,491
E-Band Communiations, Corp.	Non-Controlled Affiliate		2,846		—		(371	)		—		—		572			—		—

Total		$	36,781	$	796	$	(4,637	)	$	—	$	2,448	$	(847	)	$	128	$	2,491


	For Nine Months Ended September
	2011			2010
Expected Volatility		46.39	%		46.39	%
Expected Dividends		10	%		10	%
Expected term (in years)		4.5			4.5
Risk-free rate		0.79% - 1.98	%		1.10% - 2.51	%


	For Three Months Ended March 31,
	2012			2011
Expected Volatility		46.70	%		46.70	%
Expected Dividends		10	%		10	%
Expected term (in years)		4.5			4.5
Risk-free rate		0.61% - 1.07	%		1.65% - 2.15	%


	Quarter Ended March 31,
(in thousands, except per share data)	2012			2011
Numerator
Net increase in net assets resulting from operations	$	17,105		$	(1,178	)
Less: Dividends declared-common and restricted shares		(11,412	)		9,558

Undistributed earnings		5,693			(10,736	)

Undistributed earnings-common shares		5,693			(10,736	)
Add: Dividend declared-common shares		11,136			9,401

Numerator for basic and diluted change in net assets per common share	$	16,829		$	(1,335	)

Denominator
Basic weighted average common shares outstanding		47,018			42,737

Common shares issuable		192			—

Weighted average common shares outstanding assuming dilution		47,210			42,737
Change in net assets per common share
Basic	$	0.36		$	(0.03	)
Diluted	$	0.36		$	(0.03	)


	Payments due by period (in thousands)
Contractual Obligations	Total		Less than 1 year		1 - 3 years		3 - 5 years		After 5 years
Operating Lease Obligations⁽¹⁾	$	2,488	$	1,242	$	1,245	$	—	$	—

Total	$	2,488	$	1,242	$	1,245	$	—	$	—


2011 Closed Commitments and Pending Commitments (in millions)
January 1 – September 30 Closed Commitments	$	465.0
Q4-11 Closed Commitments (as of November 3, 2011)	$	45.0

Total year to date 2011 Closed Commitments^(a)	$	510.0

Pending Commitments (as November 3, 2011)^(b)	$	129.0

Total year to date	$	639.0