UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2011March 31, 2012

OR

For the transition period from                     to

Commission File Number 001-34221

The Providence Service Corporation

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

(520) 747-6600

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    x  Yes    ¨  No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).    x  Yes    ¨  No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    ¨  Yes    x  No

As of November 1, 2011,May 7, 2012, there were outstanding 12,993,67313,026,829 shares (excluding treasury shares of 623,576)631,013) of the registrant’s Common Stock, $0.001 par value per share.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PART I—FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements.

The Providence Service Corporation

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets

See accompanying notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements

The Providence Service Corporation

Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income

See accompanying notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements

The Providence Service Corporation

Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income

See accompanying notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements

The Providence Service Corporation

Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

See accompanying notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements

The Providence Service Corporation

Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

September 30, 2011March 31, 2012

1. Basis of Presentation, Description of Business, Summary of Significant Accounting Policies and Critical Accounting Estimates

Basis of Presentation

The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements (the “consolidated financial statements”) include the accounts of The Providence Service Corporation and its wholly-owned subsidiaries, including its foreign wholly-owned subsidiary WCG International Ltd. (“WCG”). Unless the context otherwise requires, references to the “Company”, “our”, “we” and “us” mean The Providence Service Corporation and its wholly-owned subsidiaries.

The Company follows accounting standards set by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”). The FASB establishes accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“GAAP”). Rules and interpretive releases of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) under authority of federal securities laws are also sources of authoritative GAAP for SEC registrants, which the Company is required to follow. References to GAAP issued by the FASB in these footnotes are to the FASBAccounting Standards Codification (“ASC”), which serves as a single source of authoritative non-SEC accounting and reporting standards to be applied by nongovernmental entities.

The Company’s consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with GAAP for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by GAAP for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) considered necessary for fair presentation have been included. Operating results for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011March 31, 2012 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2011.2012. Management has evaluated events and transactions that occurred after the balance sheet date and through the date these consolidated financial statements were issued and considered the effect of such events in the preparation of these consolidated financial statements.

The consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 20102011 has been derived from the audited financial statements at that date but does not include all of the information and footnotes required by GAAP for complete financial statements. The consolidated financial statements contained herein should be read in conjunction with the audited financial statements and notes included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010.

Certain amounts have been reclassified in prior periods in order to conform with the current period presentation with no affect on net income or stockholders’ equity.2011.

Description of Business

The Company is a government outsourcing privatization company. The Company operates in the following two segments: Social Services and Non-Emergency Transportation Services (“NET Services”). As of September 30, 2011, the Company operated in 42 states, and the District of Columbia, United States, and British Columbia, Canada.

The Social Services operating segment responds to governmental privatization initiatives in adult and juvenile justice, corrections, social services, welfare systems, education and workforce development by providing home-based and community-based counseling services and foster care services to at-risk families and children. These services are purchased primarily by state, county and city levels of government, and are delivered under block purchase, cost based and fee-for-service arrangements. The Company also contracts with not-for-profit organizations to provide management services for a fee.

The NET Services operating segment provides non-emergency transportation management services to Medicaid and Medicare beneficiaries. The entities that pay for non-emergency medical transportation services primarily include state Medicaid programs, health maintenance organizations and commercial insurers. MostAs of the Company’s non-emergency transportation services are delivered under capitated contracts whereMarch 31, 2012, the Company assumesoperated in 43 states, the responsibilityDistrict of meeting the transportation needs of beneficiaries residing in a specific geographic region.Columbia, United States, and British Columbia and Alberta, Canada.

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies and Critical Accounting Estimates

Foreign Currency Translation

The financial position and results of operations of WCG are measured using WCG’s local currency (Canadian Dollar) as the functional currency. Revenues and expenses of WCG have been translated into U.S. dollars at average exchange rates prevailing during the period. Assets and liabilities have been translated at the rates of exchange on the balance sheet date. The resulting translation gain and loss adjustments are recorded directly as a separate component of stockholders’ equity. At present and for the foreseeable future, the Company intends to reinvest any undistributed earnings of its foreign subsidiary in foreign operations. As a result, the Company is not providing for U.S. or additional foreign withholding taxes on its foreign subsidiary’s undistributed earnings. Generally, such earnings become subject to U.S. tax upon the remittance of dividends and under certain other circumstances. It is not practicable to estimate the amount of unrecognized deferred tax liability for temporary differences that are essentially permanent in duration on such undistributed earnings.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

Cash and cash equivalents include all cash balances and highly liquid investments with an initial maturity of three months or less. Investments in cash equivalents are carried at cost, which approximates fair value. The Company places its temporary cash investments with high credit quality financial institutions. At times such investments may be in excess of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) and the Canada Deposit Insurance Corporation (CDIC) insurance limits.

At December 31, 2010 and September 30, 2011, approximately $3.8 million and $2.9 million, respectively, of cash was held by WCG and is not freely transferable without unfavorable tax consequences between the Company and WCG.

Restricted CashSignificant Accounting Policies

The Company had approximately $16.4 millionhas established and $16.3 millionfollowed a number of accounting policies in the preparation of these consolidated financial statements in conformity with GAAP. Significant among these policies are policies related to cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash, atdeferred financing costs, non-controlling interest and stock-based compensation arrangements. These accounting policies are more fully described in the notes to the Company’s audited financial statements included in its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 and September 30, 2011, respectively, as follows:

Of the restricted cash amount at December 31, 2010 and September 30, 2011:

At September 30, 2011, approximately $5.1 million, $5.1 million, $3.9 million and $250,000 of the restricted cash was held in custody by the Bank of Tucson, Wells Fargo, Fifth Third Bank and Bank of America, respectively. The cash is restricted as to withdrawal or use and is currently invested in certificates of deposit or short-term marketable securities. Approximately $965,000 was restricted as to withdrawal or use, and was held in various non-interest bearing bank accounts related to Correctional Services and approximately $1.0 million was held at Susquehanna Bank related to restricted cash of the Company’s newly acquired subsidiary in Pennsylvania (see Note 6. Acquisitions).

Deferred Financing Costs

The Company capitalizes direct expenses incurred in connection with its borrowings or establishment of credit facilities and amortizes such expenses over the life of the respective borrowing or credit facility. The Company incurred approximately $2.2 million in deferred financing costs in connection with the credit facility it entered into in March 2011 (“Senior Credit Facility”). The Company also retains certain deferred financing costs of approximately $1.1 million related to its prior amended credit facility (“Old Credit Facility”), as certain lenders who participated in the Old Credit Facility also participate in the Company’s Senior Credit Facility. In addition, the Company incurred approximately $2.3 million in deferred financing costs in connection with its senior subordinated notes issued in November 2007. Deferred financing costs for the senior subordinated notes are amortized to interest expense on a straight-line basis and deferred financing costs for the Senior Credit Facility and the Old Credit Facility are amortized to interest expense based upon the effective interest method over the life of the credit facilities. Deferred financing costs, net of amortization, totaling approximately $5.1 million and $3.5 million at December 31, 2010 and September 30, 2011, respectively, are included in “Other assets” in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.

Non-Controlling Interest

In connection with the Company’s acquisition of WCG in August 2007, PSC of Canada Exchange Corp. (“PSC”), a subsidiary established by the Company to facilitate the purchase of all of the equity interest in WCG, issued 287,576 exchangeable shares as part of the purchase price consideration. The exchangeable shares were valued at approximately $7.8 million in accordance with the provisions of the purchase agreement ($7.6 million for accounting purposes). The shares are exchangeable at each shareholder’s option, for no additional consideration, into shares of the Company’s common stock on a one-for-one basis (“Exchangeable Shares”). Of the 287,576 Exchangeable Shares, 25,882 were exchanged as of December 31, 2010 and September 30, 2011.

The Exchangeable Shares are non-participating such that they are not entitled to any allocation of income or loss of PSC. The Exchangeable Shares represent ownership in PSC and are accounted for as “Non-controlling interest” included in stockholders’ equity in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets in the amount of approximately $7.0 million at December 31, 2010 and September 30, 2011.

The Exchangeable Shares and the 25,882 shares of the Company’s common stock issued upon the exchange of the same number of Exchangeable Shares noted above are subject to a Settlement and Indemnification Agreement dated November 17, 2009 (“Indemnification Agreement”) by and between the Company and the sellers of WCG. The Indemnification Agreement secures the Company’s claims for indemnification and associated rights and remedies provided by the Share Purchase Agreement (under which the Company acquired all of the equity interest in WCG on August 1, 2007) arising from actions taken by British Columbia to strictly enforce a contractually imposed revenue cap on a per client basis and contractually mandated pass-throughs subsequent to August 1, 2007. The actions taken by British Columbia resulted in an approximate CAD $3.0 million dispute and termination of one of its six provincial contracts with WCG, which the Company is disputing. Under the Indemnification Agreement, the sellers have agreed to transfer their rights to the Exchangeable Shares and 25,882 shares of the Company’s common stock issued upon the exchange of the same number of Exchangeable Shares to the Company to indemnify the Company against any losses suffered by the Company as the result of an unfavorable ruling upon the conclusion of arbitration. Alternatively, at their option, the sellers may pay cash in lieu of stock in satisfaction of their obligation under the Indemnification Agreement provided payment is made before or concurrently with the execution of any settlement with British Columbia.

Effective April 14, 2010, an arbitrator issued an award with respect to the dispute between WCG and British Columbia regarding British Columbia’s actions to strictly enforce a contractually imposed revenue cap on a per client basis and contractually mandated pass-throughs subsequent to August 1, 2007. Under the arbitration award, essentially all amounts disputed shall be paid to WCG (except for approximately CAD $13,000 which will be subject to the terms of the Indemnification Agreement) plus interest. The award affirmed the termination of one of the six provincial contracts that had been terminated effective October 31, 2008. During the second quarter of 2010, British Columbia filed a petition for leave to appeal the arbitration award. On October 11, 2011, the leave to appeal was granted to British Columbia. There is no financial statement impact related to these events included in our financial results for the nine months ended September 30, 2011.

Stock-Based Compensation Arrangements

Stock-based compensation expense charged against income for stock options and stock grants for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2011 was based on the grant-date fair value adjusted for estimated forfeitures based on awards expected to vest in accordance with the provisions of ASC Topic 718-Compensation-Stock Compensationand totaled approximately $946,000 (net of tax of $91,000) and $2.1 million (net of tax of $585,000), respectively.

For the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2011, the amount of excess tax benefits resulting from the exercise of stock options was approximately $62,000 and $3,000. These amounts are reflected as cash flows from financing activities for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2011 in the accompanying condensed consolidated statements of cash flows.

As of September 30, 2011, there was approximately $6.8 million of unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested stock-based compensation arrangements granted under the Company’s 2006 Long-Term Incentive Plan (“2006 Plan”). The cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 1.82 years.

Summary of Critical Accounting Estimates

The Company has made a number of estimates relating to the reporting of assets and liabilities, revenues and expenses and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities to prepare these consolidated financial statements in conformity with GAAP. The Company based its estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions the Company believes to be reasonable under the circumstances. However, actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions. Some of the more significant estimates impact revenue recognition, accounts receivable and allowance for doubtful accounts, accounting for business combinations, goodwill and other intangible assets, accrued transportation costs, accounting for management agreement relationships, loss reserves for reinsurance and self-funded insurance programs, stock-based compensation and income taxes. The Company has reviewed its critical accounting estimates with the Company’s board of directors, audit committee and disclosure committee.

New and Pending Accounting Pronouncements

New Accounting Pronouncements

In January 2010, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2010-06-Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (Topic 820): Improving Disclosures about Fair Value Measurements (“ASU 2010-06”). ASU 2010-06 amends certain disclosure requirements of Subtopic 820-10 and provides additional disclosures for transfers in and out of Levels 1 and 2 and for activity in Level 3. This ASU also clarifies certain other existing disclosure requirements including level of desegregation and disclosures around inputs and valuation techniques. The final amendments to the ASC are effective for annual or interim reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2009, except for the requirement to provide the Level 3 activity for purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements on a gross basis. That requirement is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2010, and for interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted. ASU 2010-06 does not require disclosures for earlier periods presented for comparative purposes at initial adoption. The Company adopted ASU 2010-06 as of January 1, 2010 with respect to the provisions required to be adopted as of January 1, 2010, and adopted the remaining provisions as of January 1, 2011. The adoption of ASU 2010-06 did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In December 2010, the FASB issued ASU No. 2010-28-Intangibles - Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): When to Perform Step 2 of the Goodwill Impairment Test for Reporting Units with Zero or Negative Carrying Amounts (“ASU 2010-28”). The amendments in this ASU modify Step 1 of the goodwill impairment test for reporting units with zero or negative carrying amounts. For those reporting units, an entity is required to perform Step 2 of the goodwill impairment test if it is more likely than not that a goodwill impairment exists. In determining whether it is more likely than not that a goodwill impairment exists, an entity should consider whether there are any adverse qualitative factors indicating that an impairment may exist. The qualitative factors are consistent with the existing guidance and examples, which require that goodwill of a reporting unit be tested for impairment between annual tests if an event occurs or circumstances change that would more likely than not reduce the fair value of a reporting unit below its carrying amount. For public entities, the amendments in this ASU are effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2010. The Company adopted ASU 2010-28 as of January 1, 2011. The adoption of ASU 2010-28 did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In December 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-29-Business Combinations (Topic 805): Disclosure of Supplementary Pro Forma Information for Business Combinations (“ASU 2010-29”). The amendments in this ASU affect any public entity as defined by Topic 805,Business Combinations, that enters into business combinations that are material on an individual or aggregate basis. The amendments in this ASU specify that if a public entity presents comparative financial statements, the entity should disclose revenue and earnings of the combined entity as though the business combination(s) that occurred during the current year had occurred as of the beginning of the comparable prior annual reporting period only. The amendments also expand the supplemental pro forma disclosures to include a description of the nature and amount of material, nonrecurring pro forma adjustments directly attributable to the business combination included in the reported pro forma revenue and earnings. The amendments are effective prospectively for business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after the beginning of the first annual reporting period beginning on or after December 15, 2010. The Company adopted ASU 2010-29 as of January 1, 2011. The adoption of ASU 2010-29 has only impacted disclosures in the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

Pending Accounting Pronouncements

In June 2011, the FASB issued ASUAccounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2011-05-Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Presentation of Comprehensive Income(“ASU 2011-05”). This ASU amends ASC Topic 220 to allow an entity the option to present the total of comprehensive income, the components of net income, and the components of other comprehensive income either in a single continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two separate but consecutive statements. In both choices, an entity is required to present each component of net income along with total net income, each component of other comprehensive income along with a total for other comprehensive income, and a total amount for comprehensive income. ASU 2011-05 eliminates the option to present the components of other comprehensive income as part of the statement of changes in stockholders’ equity. The amendments to the ASC inby the ASU do not change the items that must be reported in other comprehensive income or when an item of other comprehensive income must be reclassified to net income. Additionally, the FASB issued ASU 2011-12-Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Deferral of the Effective Date for Amendments to the Presentation of Reclassifications of Items Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income in Accounting Standards Update No. 2011-05(“ASU 2011-12”) in December 2011. ASU 2011-12 defers the effective date of the requirement of ASU 2011-05 to present separate line items on the income statement for reclassification adjustments of items out of accumulated other comprehensive income into net income for all periods presented. The deferral of the requirement for the presentation of reclassification adjustments is intended to be temporary until the Board reconsiders the operational concerns and needs of financial statement users. The amendments are effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2011, with early adoption permitted. The Company adopted ASU 2011-05 and ASU 2011-12 effective January 1, 2012. The adoption of ASU 2011-05 will impactand ASU 2011-12 impacted the presentation of other comprehensive income as the Company currently presentspreviously presented the components of other comprehensive income as part of the statement of changes in stockholders’ equity.

In September 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-08-Intangibles—Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Testing Goodwill for Impairment(“ASU 2011-08”). ASU 2011-08 is intended to simplify how entities test goodwill for impairment. ASU 2011-08 permits an entity to first assess qualitative factors to determine whether it is “more likely than not” that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount as a basis for determining whether it is necessary to perform the two-step goodwill impairment test described in ASC Topic 350,Intangibles-Goodwill and Other. ASU 2011-08 is effective for annual and interim goodwill impairment tests performed for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2011. Early adoption is permitted, including for annual and interim goodwill impairment tests performed as of a date before September 15, 2011, if an entity’s financial statements for the most recent annual or interim period have not yet been issued. The Company believes thatadopted ASU 2011-08 willeffective January 1, 2012. The adoption of ASU 2011-08 has not have an impact on itsimpacted the consolidated financial statements.

Pending Accounting Pronouncements

Other accounting standards and exposure drafts, such as exposure drafts related to revenue recognition, leases and fair value measurements, that have been issued or proposed by the FASB or other standards setting bodies that do not require adoption until a future date are being evaluated by the Company to determine whether adoption will have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

2. Concentration of Credit Risk

Contracts with governmental agencies and other entities that contract with governmental agencies accounted for approximately 81% and 80% of the Company’s revenue for the ninethree months ended September 30, 2010March 31, 2011 and 2011.2012, respectively. The contracts are subject to possible statutory and regulatory changes, rate adjustments, administrative rulings, rate freezes and funding reductions. Reductions in amounts paid under these contracts for the Company’s services or changes in methods or regulations governing payments for the Company’s services could materially adversely affect its revenue and profitability.

For the ninethree months ended September 30, 2010March 31, 2011 and 2011,2012, the Company conducted a portion of its operations in Canada through WCG. At December 31, 2010 and September 30, 2011, approximately $13.8 million, or 15.6%, and $13.6 million, or 13.3%,The amount of the Company’s net assets respectively, were located in Canada. In addition, approximately $17.3 million, or 2.6%,Canada at December 31, 2011 and $17.1 million, or 2.5%,March 31, 2012 and the amount of the Company’s consolidated revenue generated from its Canadian operations for the ninethree months ended September 30, 2010March 31, 2011 and 2011, respectively, was generated from the Company’s Canadian operations. 2012 were as follows:

The Company is subject to the risks inherent in conducting business across national boundaries, any one of which could adversely impact its business. In addition to currency fluctuations, these risks include, among other things: (i) economic downturns; (ii) changes in or interpretations of local law, governmental policy or regulation; (iii) restrictions on the transfer of funds into or out of the country; (iv) varying tax systems; (v) delays from doing business with governmental agencies; (vi) nationalization of foreign assets; and (vii) government protectionism. The Company intends to continue to evaluate opportunities to establish additional operations in Canada. One or more of the foregoing factors could impair the Company’s current or future Canadian operations and, as a result, harm its overall business.

3. Other Receivables and Other Assets

At December 31, 2010Other receivables and September 30, 2011, insurance premiums of approximately $3.1 million and $1.1 million, respectively, were receivable from third parties related to the reinsurance activitiesother assets consisted of the Company’s two captive subsidiaries. The insurance premiums receivable is classified as “Other receivables” in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets. In addition, the Company’s expected losses related to workers’ compensation and general and professional liability in excess of the Company’s liability under its associated reinsurance programs at December 31, 2010 were approximately $2.9 million, of which approximately $698,000 was classified as “Other receivables” and approximately $2.2 million was classified as “Other assets” in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet. The Company’s expected losses related to workers’ compensation and general and professional liability in excess of the Company’s liability under its associated reinsurance programs at September 30, 2011 were approximately $3.3 million, of which approximately $670,000 was classified as “Other receivables” and approximately $2.7 million was classified as “Other assets” in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet. The Company recorded a corresponding liability, which offset these expected losses. This liability was classified as “Reinsurance liability reserve” in current liabilities and “Other long-term liabilities” in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets.

4. Prepaid Expenses and Other

Prepaid expenses and other were comprised of the following:

5. Property and EquipmentLong-Term Obligations

Property and equipmentThe Company’s long-term obligations consisted of the following:

Depreciation expense was approximately $3.7 million and $4.2 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2011, respectively.

6. Acquisitions

On June 1, 2011, the Company acquired all of the equity interest of The ReDCo Group, Inc. (“ReDCo”). ReDCo is a Pennsylvania corporation that provides home and community based services. The purchase price of $605,000 was funded by the Company’s cash flow from operations. Additionally, the Company repaid ReDCo’s debt of approximately $8.0 million. Historically, the Company provided various management services to ReDCo for a fee under a management services agreement. This acquisition further expands the Company’s home and community based services in Pennsylvania.

The initial accounting of the purchase price allocation is not complete as the Company acquired various assets, including real estate, that require appraisal. Additionally, the Company is in the process of valuing acquired intangible assets and income tax related assets and liabilities. The Company expects to finalize the valuation and complete the purchase price allocation before December 31, 2011 but no later than one year from the acquisition date. The Company has recognized approximately $88,000 of acquisition related expenses, of which approximately $57,000 was recognized during the nine months ended September 30, 2011.

The amounts of ReDCo’s unaudited revenue and net income included in the Company’s condensed consolidated statements of income for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011, and the unaudited proforma revenue and net income of the combined entity had the acquisition date been January 1, 2010, are:

The pro forma information above includes adjustments for acquisition costs as well as the elimination of management fee revenue and expenses to provide management services to ReDCo under the historical management services agreement. The pro forma financial information is not necessarily indicative of the results of operations that would have occurred had the transaction been affected on January 1, 2010. Additionally, the pro forma financial information does not include amortization expense for any intangibles that were acquired as the intangible assets have not yet been valued.

7. Long-Term Obligations

On March 11, 2011, the Company replaced the Old Credit Facility with the Senior Credit Facility and paid all amounts due under the Old Credit Facility with cash in the amount of $12.3 million and proceeds from the Senior Credit Facility as discussed in further detail below.

On March 11, 2011, the Company entered into a Credit Agreement, representing the Senior Credit Facility, with Bank of America, N.A., as administrative agent, swing line lender and letter of credit issuer, SunTrust Bank, as syndication agent, Bank of Arizona, Alliance Bank of Arizona and Royal Bank of Canada, as co-documentation agents, Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated and SunTrust Robinson Humphrey, Inc., as joint lead arrangers and joint book managers and other lenders party thereto (“New Credit Agreement”).

The New Credit Agreement provides the Company with the Senior Credit Facility in aggregate principal amount of $140.0 million, comprised of a $100.0 million term loan facility and a $40.0 million revolving credit facility. There is an option to increase the amount of the term loan facility and/or the revolving credit facility by an aggregate amount of up to $85.0 million as described below. The Senior Credit Facility includes sublimits for swingline loans and letters of credit in amounts of up to $10.0 million and $25.0 million, respectively. On March 11, 2011, the Company borrowed the entire amount available under the term loan facility and used the proceeds thereof to repay amounts outstanding under the Old Credit Facility. Prospectively, the proceeds of the Senior Credit Facility may be used to (i) fund ongoing working capital requirements; (ii) make capital expenditures; (iii) repay the 6.5% convertible senior subordinate notes (“Notes”); and (iv) other general corporate purposes.

Under the Senior Credit Facility the Company has an option to request an increase in the amount of the revolving credit facility and/or the term loan facility from time to time (on substantially the same terms as apply to the existing facilities) by an aggregate amount of up to $85.0 million with either additional commitments from lenders under the New Credit Agreement at such time or new commitments from financial institutions acceptable to the administrative agent in its reasonable discretion, so long as no default or event of default exists at the time of any such increase. The Company may not be able to access additional funds under this increase option as no lender is obligated to participate in any such increase under the Senior Credit Facility.

The Senior Credit Facility matures on March 11, 2016; provided, however that, if there are more than $25.0 million of the Company’s Notes outstanding on September 30, 2013, the Senior Credit Facility will terminate and all amounts outstanding thereunder will be due and payable in full on November 15, 2013, unless the Company has provided the administrative agent with cash collateral on or before September 30, 2013 in an amount sufficient to repay the aggregate outstanding principal amount of the Notes. In the event that there are more than $25.0 million of the Company’s Notes outstanding on September 30, 2013, the maturity date will be automatically reinstated to March 11, 2016 if: (i) we reduce the principal amount of the Notes to an aggregate amount of no more than $25.0 million on a date prior to November 15, 2013, (ii) we have availability under the revolving credit facility plus unrestricted cash in an amount at least equal to the aggregate outstanding principal amount of the Notes on such date and (iii) there is no default or event of default under the Senior Credit Facility on such date. The Company may prepay the Senior Credit Facility in whole or in part, at any time without premium or penalty, subject to reimbursement of the lenders’ breakage and redeployment costs in connection with prepayments of LIBOR loans. The unutilized portion of the commitments under the Senior Credit Facility may be irrevocably reduced or terminated by the Company at any time without penalty.

Interest on the outstanding principal amount of the loans accrues, at the Company’s election, at a per annum rate equal to the London Interbank Offering Rate (“LIBOR”), plus an applicable margin or the base rate plus an applicable margin. The applicable margin ranges from 2.25% to 3.00% in the case of LIBOR loans and 1.25% to 2.00% in the case of the base rate loans, in each case, based on the Company’s consolidated leverage ratio as defined in the New Credit Agreement. Interest on the loans is payable at least once every three months in arrears. In addition, the Company is obligated to pay a quarterly commitment fee based on a percentage of the unused portion of each lender’s commitment under the revolving credit facility and quarterly letter of credit fees based on a percentage of the maximum amount available to be drawn under each outstanding letter of credit. The commitment fee and letter of credit fee ranges from 0.35% to 0.50% and 2.25% to 3.00%, respectively, in each case, based on the Company’s consolidated leverage ratio.

The term loan facility is subject to quarterly amortization payments, commencing on June 30, 2011, so that the following percentages of the term loan outstanding on the closing date plus the principal amount of any term loans funded pursuant to the increase option are repaid as follows: 10% in each of the first two years, 15% in each of the third and fourth years and the remaining balance in the fifth year. The Senior Credit Facility also requires the Company (subject to certain exceptions as set forth in the New Credit Agreement) to prepay the outstanding loans in an aggregate amount equal to 100% of the net cash proceeds received from certain asset dispositions, debt issuances, insurance and casualty awards and other extraordinary receipts.

The New Credit Agreement contains customary representations and warranties, affirmative and negative covenants and events of default. The negative covenants include restrictions on the Company’s ability to, among other things, incur additional indebtedness, create liens, make investments, give guarantees, pay dividends, sell assets and merge and consolidate. The Company is subject to financial covenants, including consolidated net leverage and consolidated net senior leverage covenants as well as a consolidated fixed charge covenant. The Company was in compliance with all financial covenants as of September 30, 2011.

The Company’s obligations under the Senior Credit Facility are guaranteed by all of its present and future domestic subsidiaries, excluding certain domestic subsidiaries, which include its insurance captives and not-for-profit subsidiaries. The Company’s obligations under, and each guarantor’s obligations under its guaranty of the Senior Credit Facility are secured by a first priority lien on substantially all of its respective assets, including a pledge of 100% of the issued and outstanding stock of its domestic subsidiaries and 65% of the issued and outstanding stock of its first tier foreign subsidiaries. If an event of default occurs, the required lenders may cause the administrative agent to declare all unpaid principal and any accrued and unpaid interest and all fees and expenses under the Senior Credit Facility to be immediately due and payable. All amounts outstanding under the Senior Credit Facility will automatically become due and payable upon the commencement of any bankruptcy, insolvency or similar proceedings. The New Credit Agreement also contains a cross default to any of the Company’s indebtedness having a principal amount in excess of $7.5 million.

Additionally, the Company incurred financing fees of approximately $2.6 million to refinance the Old Credit Facility and is accounting for such fees, as well as unamortized deferred financing fees related to the Old Credit Facility, under ASC 470-50 –Debt Modifications and Extinguishments. As both credit facilities were loan syndications, and a number of lenders participated in both credit facilities, the Company evaluated the accounting for financing fees on a lender by lender basis. Of the total amount of unamortized deferred financing fees related to the Old Credit Facility as of March 11, 2011, approximately $1.1 million will continue to be deferred and amortized to interest expense and approximately $2.5 million was expensed in the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and is included in “Loss on extinguishment of debt” in the accompanying condensed consolidated statement of income. Of the $2.6 million of fees incurred related to the Senior Credit Facility, approximately $2.2 million was deferred and will be amortized to interest expense and approximately $389,000 was expensed as interest expense in the nine months ended September 30, 2011.

During the nine months ended September 30, 2011, the Company repurchased approximately $20.0 million of the Notes.31, 2012.

The carrying amount of the long-term obligations approximated its fair value at December 31, 20102011 and September 30, 2011.March 31, 2012. The fair value of the Company’s long-term obligations was estimated based on interest rates for the same or similar debt offered to the Company having same or similar remaining maturities and collateral requirements.

The terms of the Notes, revolving loan and term loan are more fully described in the notes to the Company’s audited financial statements included in its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011.

8.6. Business Segments

The Company’s operations are organized and reviewed by management along its services lines. The Company operates in two reportable segments as separate divisions and differentiates the segments based on the nature of the services they offer.offer and the criteria in ASC Topic 280, “Segment Reporting”. The following describes each of the Company’s segments and its corporate services area.

Social Services. Social Services includes government sponsored social services consisting of home and community based, foster care and not-for-profit management services. Through Social Services the Company providesThese services to a common customer group, principally individualsare purchased primarily by state, county and families. Allcity levels of the operating entities within Social Services follow similar operating proceduresgovernment, and methods in managing their operationsare delivered under block purchase, cost based and each operating entity works within a similar regulatory environment, primarily under Medicaid regulations.fee-for-service arrangements. The Company manages the activities of Social Services by actualalso contracts with not-for-profit organizations to budget comparisons within each operating entity rather than by comparison between entities. The Company’s budget related to Social Services is prepared on an entity-by-entity basis which represents the aggregation of individual location operating budgets within each Social Services entity and is comprised of:

The actual operating contribution margins of the operating entities that comprise Social Services ranged from approximately 1.3% to 12.3%provide management services for the year ended December 31, 2010. The Company believes that the long term operating contribution margins of the operating entities that comprise Social Services will approximate between 8% and 12% as the respective entities’ markets mature, the Company cross sells its services within markets, and standardizes its operating model among entities including acquisitions.

In evaluating the financial performance and economic characteristics of Social Services, the Company’s chief operating decision maker regularly reviews the following types of financial and non-financial information for each operating entity within Social Services:

While the Company’s chief operating decision maker evaluates performance in comparison to budget based on the operating results of the individual operating entities within Social Services, the operating entities are aggregated into one reporting segment for financial reporting purposes because the Company believes that the operating entities exhibit similar long term financial performance. In conjunction with the financial performance trends, the Company believes the similar qualitative characteristics of the operating entities it aggregates within Social Services and budgetary constraints of the Company’s payers in each market provide a foundation to conclude that the entities that the Company aggregates within Social Services have similar economic characteristics. Thus, the Company believes the economic characteristics of its operating entities within Social Services meet the criteria for aggregation into a single reporting segment under ASC Topic 280, “Segment Reporting”.fee.

NET Services. NET Services is comprised primarily of managing the delivery of non-emergency transportation services.services to Medicaid and Medicare beneficiaries. The Company operates NET Services as a separate divisionentities that pay for non-emergency medical transportation services are primarily state Medicaid programs, health maintenance organizations and commercial insurers. Most of the Company’s non-emergency transportation services are delivered under capitated contracts where the Company with operational management and service offerings distinct fromassumes the Company’s Social Services operating segment. Financial and operating performance reporting is conducted atresponsibility of meeting the transportation needs of a contract level and reviewed weekly at both the operating entity level as well as the corporate level by the Company’s chief operating decision maker. Gross margin performance of individual contracts is consolidated under the associated operating entity and direct general and administrative expenses are allocated to the operating entity.specific geographic population.

Corporate. Corporate includes corporate accounting and finance, information technology, external audit, tax compliance, business development, compliance, internal audit, employee training, legal and various other overhead costs, all of which are directly allocated to the operating segments.

Segment asset disclosures include propertyThe basis of segmentation and equipment and other intangible assets. The accounting policiesmeasurement of segment profit or loss has not changed from that disclosed in the Company’s segments areaudited financial statements and notes included in its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the same as those of the consolidated Company. The Company evaluates performance based on operating income. Operating income is revenue less operating expenses (including client service expense, cost of non-emergency transportation services, general and administrative expense and depreciation and amortization) but is not affected by other income/expense or by income taxes. Other income/expense consists principally of interest expense, loss on extinguishment of debt and interest income. In calculating operating income for each segment, general and administrative expenses incurred at the corporate level are allocated to each segment based upon their relative direct expense levels excluding costs for purchased services. All intercompany transactions have been eliminated.year ended December 31, 2011.

The following table sets forth certain financial information attributable to the Company’s business segments for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010March 31, 2011 and 2011.2012. In addition, none of the segments have significant non-cash items other than depreciation and amortization and loss on extinguishment of debt in reportedoperating income.

			$217,151,296				$217,151,296				$217,151,296				$217,151,296
		For the nine months ended September 30, 2010
		Social Services (c)				NET Services				Corporate (a)(b)				Consolidated Total
Revenues		$	258,917,623			$	401,513,512			$	—			$	660,431,135
Depreciation and amortization		$	4,583,704			$	4,844,314			$	—			$	9,428,018
Operating income		$	7,482,077			$	38,597,341			$	—			$	46,079,418
Net interest expense (income)		$	(136,373	)		$	12,322,524			$	—			$	12,186,151
Total assets		$	152,563,758			$	205,856,237			$	39,626,634			$	398,046,629
Capital expenditures		$	1,144,189			$	2,157,869			$	5,115,206			$	8,417,264
		For the nine months ended September 30, 2011
		Social Services (c)				NET Services				Corporate (a)(b)				Consolidated Total
Revenues		$	271,686,054			$	426,982,486			$	—			$	698,668,540
Depreciation and amortization		$	5,133,530			$	4,845,960			$	—			$	9,979,490
Operating income		$	10,881,194			$	18,704,386			$	—			$	29,585,580
Net interest expense (income)		$	98,282			$	8,006,936			$	—			$	8,105,218
Loss on extinguishment of debt		$	1,857,029			$	606,453			$	—			$	2,463,482
Total assets		$	154,796,304			$	199,292,650			$	23,994,320			$	378,083,274
Capital expenditures		$	1,848,534			$	3,166,164			$	3,660,656			$	8,675,354

		For the three months ended March 31,
		2011				2012
Revenues:
Social Services		$	88,840,480			$	95,475,361
NET Services			138,965,856				164,671,756
Consolidated		$	227,806,336			$	260,147,117
Operating income:
Social Services		$	4,928,345			$	3,306,121
NET Services			8,782,799				3,287,175
Consolidated (a)		$	13,711,144			$	6,593,296

9. Stockholders’ Equity and Other Comprehensive Income7. Stock-Based Compensation Arrangements

The Company’s second amendedCompany issues both option awards and restated certificate of incorporation provides that the Company’s authorized capitalrestricted stock consists of 40,000,000 shares of common stock, $0.001 par value per share, and 10,000,000 shares of preferred stock, $0.001 par value per share.

During the nine months ended September 30, 2011, the Company granted options to purchase an aggregate of 247,000 shares of the Company’s common stock under its 2006 Plan at exercise prices equal to the market value of the Company’s common stock on the date of grant. The options were granted to executive officers, certain key employees and non-employee directors of the Company. The options vest in equal installments at various times over the next three yearsdirectors. Option awards and have a term of ten years. The weighted-average fair value of the options granted during the nine months ended September 30, 2011 totaled $10.40 per share.

The Company granted a total of 100,100 shares of restricted stock to its executive officers and non-employee directors of the Company during the nine months ended September 30, 2011. These awardsgenerally vest in three equal annual installments on the first, second and third anniversaries of the date of grant. The weighted-average fair value of option awards was estimated on the restricteddate of grant using the Black-Scholes-Merton option-pricing formula and amortized over the option’s vesting periods, while that of a non-vested stock awards granted duringgrant was determined based on the nine months ended September 30, 2011 totaled $14.57 per share.

The Company issued 33,694 shares of its common stock to its executive officers and non-employee directors of the Company upon the vesting of certain restricted stock awards granted in 2009 and 2010 under the Company’s 2006 Plan. In connection with the vesting of these restricted stock awards, 3,808 sharesclosing market price of the Company’s common stock were surrendered toon the Company bydate of grant. The following table summarizes the recipients to pay their associated taxes due tostock option activity:

The following table summarizes the Federalactivity of the shares and state taxing authorities. These shares were placed in treasury.

At December 31, 2010 and September 30, 2011, there were 13,580,385 and 13,617,249 sharesweighted-average grant date fair value of the Company’s non-vested common stock outstanding, respectively, (including 619,768 and 623,576 treasury shares at December 31, 2010 and September 30, 2011, respectively) and no shares of preferred stock outstanding.

Other comprehensive income included foreign currency translation adjustments which amounted to a loss of approximately $377,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2011.

The components of comprehensive income, net of taxes, for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2011 were as follows:stock:

The following table reflects changes in common stock, additional paid-in capital, treasury stock and accumulated other comprehensive loss for the nine months ended September 30, 2011:

10.8. Performance Restricted Stock Units

On March 14, 2011,January 13, 2012, the Company granted 122,144113,891 performance restricted stock units (“PRSUs”) to its executive officers that may be settled in cash. The number of PRSUs eligible to be settled in cash will be based on the achievement of return on equity (determined by the quotient resulting from dividing the Company’s audited consolidated net income for 2011the performance period by the Company’s average of its beginning of the year and end of the year stockholders’ equity for 2011)equity) (“ROE”), and will not be determinable until March 1, 2012 or soon thereafter, but in no event later than March 15, 2012 (“Settlement Date”) when targets established by the Compensation Committee (“Committee”) for the performance periods described below. Payment of the Company’s Boardaward, if earned, will be divided into two tranches (each tranche representing half of Directorsthe total number of PRSUs) corresponding to the required performance period where the first tranche will be paid on or between March 1, 2014 and March 15, 2014 based on the ROE level achieved by the Company for the period beginning January 1, 2012 and ending December 31, 2013. The second tranche will be paid on or between March 1, 2015 and March 15, 2015 based on the ROE level achieved by the Company for the period beginning January 1, 2012 and ending December 31, 2014.

In both cases, the Committee will certify in writing the ROE level achieved for 2011.the performance periods on March 1, 2014 related to the first tranche and March 1, 2015 related to the second tranche, or as soon thereafter as the Committee is provided with the Company’s audited financial statements, but in no event in either case later than March 15, 2014 and 2015, respectively (such date referred to as the Settlement Date). In addition, such certification will occur immediately prior to each of the respective cash settlements. The following are the payout percentages for the ROE target levels are as follows:set by the Committee.

If the Company’s actual ROE falls between the 14%Threshold and 18%Target levels, the payout amount will be determined by linear interpolation.interpolation on the Settlement Date.

If the Threshold or Target payout level is achieved, then the amount of the award will be determined by multiplying the number of PRSUs corresponding to the ROE level achieved by the fair market value (at closing market price) of the Company’s common stock on the Settlement Date. Payment of the award will be equally divided into three tranches corresponding to the required vesting period where the first tranche will be paid on the Settlement Date and the remaining tranches will be paid to vested participants on or between March 1 and March 15, 2013 and 2014, respectively. Vesting criteria for PRSU awards require employment with the Company throughout 2011the performance periods as well as achievement of the performance goal, and employment up through each applicable service vesting date which will be December 31, 2011, 20122013 and 20132014 for each of the threetwo respective tranches.

The Company applies a graded vesting expense methodology when accounting for the PRSUs and the fair value of the liability is remeasured at the end of each reporting period through the Settlement Date. Compensation expense associated with the PRSUs is based upon the closing market price of the Company’s common stock on the measurement date and the number of units expected to be earned after assessing the probability that certain performance criteria will be met and the associated targeted payout level that is forecasted will be achieved, net of estimated forfeitures. Cumulative adjustments are recorded each quarter to reflect changes in the stock price and estimated outcome of the performance-related conditions until the Settlement Date. Compensation expense of approximately $596,000$105,000 was recorded by the Company for the ninethree months ended September 30, 2011March 31, 2012 related to the PRSUs.PRSUs discussed above. Additionally, compensation expense of approximately $280,000 and $237,000 was recorded for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2012, respectively, for the PRSUs granted in 2011.

9. Stockholders’ Equity

The following table reflects changes in common stock, additional paid-in capital, treasury stock and accumulated other comprehensive loss for the three months ended March 31, 2012:

										Additional												Accumulated Other
		Common Stock								Paid-In				Treasury Stock								Comprehensive
		Shares				Amount				Capital				Shares				Amount				Loss
Balance at December 31, 2011			13,621,951			$	13,622			$	176,172,365				623,576			$	(11,435,033	)		$	(1,127,559	)
Stock-based compensation			—				—				1,066,833				—				—				—
Exercise of employee stock options, including net tax windfall of $14,373			8,467				8				94,192				—				—				—
Restricted stock issued			24,495				25				(25	)			7,437				(117,727	)			—
Foreign currency translation adjustments			—				—				—				—				—				279,041
Balance at March 31, 2012			13,654,913			$	13,655			$	177,333,365				631,013			$	(11,552,760	)		$	(848,518	)