UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

Form 10-Q

(Mark One)

QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended ~~December 31, 2011~~June 30, 2012

TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Commission File Number: 001-13057

Ralph Lauren Corporation

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)


Delaware		13-2622036
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
650 Madison Avenue, New York, New York		10022 (Zip Code)
(Address of principal executive offices)

(212) 318-7000

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes þ No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.


Large accelerated filer	þ	Accelerated filer	¨
Non-accelerated filer	¨ (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)	Smaller reporting company	¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No þ

At ~~February~~August 3, 2012, ~~61,509,688~~60,322,531 shares of the registrant’s Class A common stock, $.01 par value, and 30,831,276 shares of the registrant’s Class B common stock, $.01 par value, were outstanding.

RALPH LAUREN CORPORATION

INDEX


		Page
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION (Unaudited)

Item 1.	Financial Statements:
	Consolidated Balance Sheets		3
	Consolidated Statements of Operations		4
	Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income		5
	Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows		56
	Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements		67
Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations		3130
Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk		5546
Item 4.	Controls and Procedures		5546

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1.	Legal Proceedings		5648
Item 1A.	Risk Factors		5749
Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds		5749
Item 6.	Exhibits		5750
Signatures			5851
EX-31.1
EX-31.2
EX-32.1
EX-32.2
EX-101	INSTANCE DOCUMENT
EX-101	SCHEMA DOCUMENT
EX-101	CALCULATION LINKBASE DOCUMENT
EX-101	LABELS LINKBASE DOCUMENT
EX-101	PRESENTATION LINKBASE DOCUMENT
EX-101	DEFINITION LINKBASE DOCUMENT

RALPH LAUREN CORPORATION

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

			$000,000,0			$000,000,0
		December 31, 2011			April 2, 2011				June 30, 2012			March 31, 2012
		(millions)							(millions)
		(unaudited)							(unaudited)
ASSETS	ASSETS							ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents		$	815.8		$	453.0			$	468.5		$	671.6
Short-term investments			386.3			593.9				563.0			515.7
Accounts receivable, net of allowances of $242.5 million and $230.9 million			440.2			442.8
Accounts receivable, net of allowances of $243.5 million and $262.7 million										395.3			547.2
Inventories			894.7			702.1				964.1			841.6
Income tax receivable			9.8			57.8				19.7			17.2
Deferred tax assets			101.9			92.1				126.8			125.6
Prepaid expenses and other			177.8			136.3				181.9			181.0

Total current assets			2,826.5			2,478.0				2,719.3			2,899.9
Non-current investments			72.5			83.6				82.1			99.9
Property and equipment, net			826.5			788.8				869.7			884.1
Deferred tax assets			72.2			76.7				33.3			39.8
Goodwill			1,013.4			1,016.3				1,002.7			1,004.0
Intangible assets, net			370.2			387.7				354.9			359.0
Other assets			145.2			150.0				132.1			129.7

Total assets		$	5,326.5		$	4,981.1			$	5,194.1		$	5,416.4


LIABILITIES AND EQUITY	LIABILITIES AND EQUITY							LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable		$	169.7		$	141.3			$	206.5		$	180.6
Income tax payable			142.8			8.9				65.1			71.9
Accrued expenses and other			666.7			681.8				661.4			693.7

Total current liabilities			979.2			832.0				933.0			946.2
Long-term debt			265.6			291.9				261.0			274.4
Non-current liability for unrecognized tax benefits			162.8			156.4				164.2			168.0
Other non-current liabilities			389.2			396.1				364.1			375.3

Commitments and contingencies (Note 13)
Commitments and contingencies (Note 12)

Total liabilities			1,796.8			1,676.4				1,722.3			1,763.9

Equity:
Class A common stock, par value $.01 per share; 90.7 million and 89.5 million shares issued; 61.5 million and 63.7 million shares outstanding			0.9			0.9
Class A common stock, par value $.01 per share; 91.9 million and 91.1 million shares issued; 60.3 million and 61.9 million shares outstanding										0.9			0.9
Class B common stock, par value $.01 per share; 30.8 million shares issued and outstanding			0.3			0.3				0.3			0.3
Additional paid-in-capital			1,567.0			1,444.7				1,668.1			1,624.0
Retained earnings			3,966.5			3,435.3				4,199.3			4,042.4
Treasury stock, Class A, at cost (29.2 million and 25.8 million shares)			(2,211.7	)		(1,792.3	)
Treasury stock, Class A, at cost (31.6 million and 29.2 million shares)										(2,558.2	)		(2,211.7	)
Accumulated other comprehensive income			206.7			215.8				161.4			196.6

Total equity			3,529.7			3,304.7				3,471.8			3,652.5

Total liabilities and equity		$	5,326.5		$	4,981.1			$	5,194.1		$	5,416.4

See accompanying notes.

RALPH LAUREN CORPORATION

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

		$000,000,000			$000,000,000			$000,000,000			$000,000,000
	Three Months Ended						Nine Months Ended						Three Months Ended
	December 31, 2011			January 1, 2011			December 31, 2011			January 1, 2011			June 30, 2012			July 2, 2011
	(millions, except per share data) (unaudited)												(millions, except per share data) (unaudited)
Net sales	$	1,756.0		$	1,497.9		$	5,099.3		$	4,099.0		$	1,551.4		$	1,486.5
Licensing revenue		49.6			50.1			137.3			134.4			42.0			39.9

Net revenues		1,805.6			1,548.0			5,236.6			4,233.4			1,593.4			1,526.4
Cost of goods sold^(a)		(774.0	)		(640.1	)		(2,164.9	)		(1,725.4	)		(601.3	)		(564.9	)

Gross profit		1,031.6			907.9			3,071.7			2,508.0			992.1			961.5

Other costs and expenses:
Selling, general and administrative expenses^(a)		(754.3	)		(655.3	)		(2,146.9	)		(1,761.6	)		(693.4	)		(672.3	)
Amortization of intangible assets		(7.2	)		(6.3	)		(21.8	)		(18.5	)		(6.7	)		(7.1	)

Total other costs and expenses		(761.5	)		(661.6	)		(2,168.7	)		(1,780.1	)		(700.1	)		(679.4	)

Operating income		270.1			246.3			903.0			727.9			292.0			282.1
Foreign currency gains (losses)		(2.2	)		(2.6	)		(4.2	)		(1.2	)		(2.6	)		(3.8	)
Interest expense		(6.3	)		(4.3	)		(18.8	)		(13.2	)		(5.5	)		(6.1	)
Interest and other income, net		2.7			1.8			9.3			5.2			1.3			4.2
Equity in income (loss) of equity-method investees		(2.2	)		(2.8	)		(5.2	)		(4.8	)		(1.3	)		(1.9	)

Income before provision for income taxes		262.1			238.4			884.1			713.9			283.9			274.5
Provision for income taxes		(93.1	)		(70.0	)		(297.5	)		(219.5	)		(90.5	)		(90.4	)

Net income attributable to RLC	$	169.0		$	168.4		$	586.6		$	494.4		$	193.4		$	184.1

Net income per common share attributable to RLC:
Basic	$	1.83		$	1.76		$	6.32		$	5.15		$	2.10		$	1.96

Diluted	$	1.78		$	1.72		$	6.14		$	5.01		$	2.03		$	1.90

Weighted average common shares outstanding:
Basic		92.2			95.5			92.8			96.0			92.2			93.9

Diluted		94.9			98.1			95.6			98.7			95.1			96.8

Dividends declared per share	$	0.20		$	0.10		$	0.60		$	0.30		$	0.40		$	0.20

^(a)Includes total depreciation expense of:	$	(49.6	)	$	(44.1	)	$	(146.4	)	$	(124.3	)	$	(49.4	)	$	(48.3	)

See accompanying notes.

RALPH LAUREN CORPORATION

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF ~~CASH FLOWS~~COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

$000,000,000 $000,000,000
Nine Months Ended
December 31,
2011 January 1,
2011

(millions)
(unaudited)
Cash flows from operating activities:

Net income
$ 586.6    $ 494.4
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:

Depreciation and amortization expense
168.2    142.8
Deferred income tax benefit
(21.5 ) (33.2 )
Equity in losses of equity-method investees, net of dividends received
5.2    4.8
Non-cash stock-based compensation expense
55.2    48.9
Excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation arrangements
(25.5 ) (34.2 )
Other non-cash charges (benefits), net
5.9    (5.5 )
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:

Accounts receivable
(8.6 ) 47.0
Inventories
(203.1 ) (179.4 )
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
0.5    45.0
Income tax receivables and payables
208.0    21.1
Deferred income
(12.0 ) (18.1 )
Other balance sheet changes
25.3    60.7

Net cash provided by operating activities
784.2    594.3

Cash flows from investing activities:

Acquisitions and ventures, net of cash acquired and purchase price settlements
(10.1 ) (67.8 )
Purchases of investments
  (1,070.0 )   (1,019.5 )
Proceeds from sales and maturities of investments
1,248.4    1,002.1
Capital expenditures
(160.1 ) (171.5 )
Change in restricted cash deposits
1.0    15.9

Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities
9.2    (240.8 )

Cash flows from financing activities:

Proceeds from credit facilities
107.7    —
Repayments of borrowings on credit facilities
(107.7 ) —
Payments of capital lease obligations
(5.6 ) (6.6 )
Payments of dividends
(55.8 ) (28.9 )
Repurchases of common stock, including shares surrendered for tax withholdings
(419.4 ) (347.7 )
Proceeds from exercise of stock options
41.6    67.7
Excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation arrangements
25.5    34.2
Payment on interest rate swap termination
(7.6 ) —
Other financing activities
0.2    (0.5 )

Net cash used in financing activities
(421.1 ) (281.8 )

Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents
(9.5 ) 8.6

Net increase in cash and cash equivalents
362.8    80.3
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
453.0    563.1

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
$ 815.8    $ 643.4


	Three Months Ended
	June 30, 2012			July 2, 2011
	(millions) (unaudited)
Net income attributable to RLC	$	193.4		$	184.1

Other comprehensive income, net of tax:
Foreign currency translation adjustments		(41.3	)		32.4
Net realized and unrealized gains (losses) on derivatives		5.9			(8.1	)
Net realized and unrealized gains (losses) on available-for-sale investments		0.1			—
Net realized and unrealized gains (losses) on defined benefit plans		0.1			(0.1	)

Other comprehensive income, net of tax		(35.2	)		24.2

Total comprehensive income attributable to RLC	$	158.2		$	208.3

See accompanying notes.

RALPH LAUREN CORPORATION

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS


	Three Months Ended
	June 30, 2012			July 2, 2011
	(millions) (unaudited)
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income	$	193.4		$	184.1
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization expense		56.1			55.4
Deferred income tax benefit		(6.3	)		(7.1	)
Equity in loss of equity-method investees, net of dividends received		1.3			1.9
Non-cash stock-based compensation expense		21.6			17.9
Excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation arrangements		(19.7	)		(10.6	)
Other non-cash charges, net		2.6			5.2
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable		148.8			58.0
Inventories		(130.7	)		(183.0	)
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities		7.5			18.0
Income tax receivables and payables		6.7			96.2
Deferred income		(8.0	)		(1.1	)
Other balance sheet changes		(4.6	)		(22.5	)

Net cash provided by operating activities		268.7			212.4

Cash flows from investing activities:
Acquisitions and ventures, net of cash acquired and purchase price settlements		(6.7	)		(7.9	)
Purchases of investments		(278.3	)		(377.5	)
Proceeds from sales and maturities of investments		218.0			516.3
Capital expenditures		(61.6	)		(39.3	)
Change in restricted cash deposits		7.4			0.3

Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities		(121.2	)		91.9

Cash flows from financing activities:
Proceeds from credit facilities		—			7.7
Payments of capital lease obligations		(3.1	)		(1.4	)
Payments of dividends		(18.5	)		(18.9	)
Repurchases of common stock, including shares surrendered for tax withholdings		(346.5	)		(324.5	)
Proceeds from exercise of stock options		2.8			3.2
Excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation arrangements		19.7			10.6
Payment on interest rate swap termination		—			(7.6	)
Other financing activities		—			0.2

Net cash used in financing activities		(345.6	)		(330.7	)

Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents		(5.0	)		4.9

Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents		(203.1	)		(21.5	)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period		671.6			453.0

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	468.5		$	431.5

See accompanying notes.

RALPH LAUREN CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(In millions, except per share data and where otherwise indicated)

(Unaudited)

1. Description of Business

Ralph Lauren Corporation (“RLC”) is a global leader in the design, marketing and distribution of premium lifestyle products, including men’s, women’s and children’s apparel, accessories (including footwear), fragrances and home furnishings. RLC’s long-standing reputation and distinctive image have been consistently developed across an expanding number of products, brands and international markets. RLC’s brand names includePolo Ralph Lauren, Purple Label, Ralph Lauren Women’s Collection, Black Label, Blue Label, Lauren by Ralph Lauren, RRL, RLX Ralph Lauren, Denim & Supply Ralph Lauren, Rugby, Ralph Lauren, Ralph Lauren Childrenswear, American Living, Chaps andClub Monaco, among others. RLC and its subsidiaries are collectively referred to herein as the “Company,” “we,” “us,” “our” and “ourselves,” unless the context indicates otherwise.

The Company classifies its businesses into three segments: Wholesale, Retail and Licensing. The Company’s wholesale sales are made principally to major department stores and specialty stores located throughout ~~the U.S., Canada,~~North America, Europe, Asia and South America. The Company also sells directly to consumers through ~~full-price and factory~~ retail stores located throughout ~~the U.S., Canada,~~North America, Europe, Asia and South America; through concessions-based shop-within-shops located primarily in Asia; and through its retail e-commerce channel, which includes ~~domestic sites located at www.RalphLauren.com and www.Rugby.com,~~its North American and European ~~sites for the United Kingdom and France (including the surrounding countries of Belgium, Luxembourg and the Netherlands) located at www.RalphLauren.co.uk and www.RalphLauren.fr, respectively.~~sites. In ~~October 2011,~~April 2012, the Company expanded its e-commerce presence ~~in Europe~~ by launching a new retail e-commerce site for itsClub Monaco business in ~~Germany~~Canada located at ~~www.RalphLauren.de, which also ships products to Austria.~~www.ClubMonaco.ca. The Company also licenses the right to unrelated third parties to use its various trademarks in connection with the manufacture and sale of designated products, such as apparel, eyewear and fragrances, in specified geographical areas for specified periods.

On August 11, 2011, at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders, the Company’s stockholders approved an amendment to the Company’s Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation to change the Company’s name from Polo Ralph Lauren Corporation to Ralph Lauren Corporation. The Company’s name change became effective on August 15, 2011.

2. Basis of Presentation

Interim Financial Statements

The interim consolidated financial statements have been prepared pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”). The interim consolidated financial statements are unaudited. In the opinion of management, however, such consolidated financial statements contain all normal and recurring adjustments necessary to present fairly the consolidated financial condition, results of operations, comprehensive income and changes in cash flows of the Company for the interim periods presented. In addition, certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the U.S. (“US GAAP”) have been condensed or omitted from this report as is permitted by the SEC’s rules and regulations. However, the Company believes that the disclosures herein are adequate to make the information presented not misleading.

The consolidated balance sheet data as of ~~April 2, 2011~~March 31, 2012 is derived from the audited consolidated financial statements included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC for the fiscal year ended ~~April 2, 2011~~March 31, 2012 (the “Fiscal ~~2011~~2012 10-K”), which should be read in conjunction with these unaudited interim ~~unaudited~~ consolidated financial statements. Reference is made to the Fiscal ~~2011~~2012 10-K for a complete set of financial statements.

~~RALPH LAUREN CORPORATION~~

~~NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)~~

Basis of Consolidation

The unaudited interim consolidated financial statements present the financial position, results of operations, comprehensive income and cash flows of the Company, including all entities in which the Company has a

RALPH LAUREN CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

controlling financial interest and is determined to be the primary beneficiary. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

Fiscal Year

The Company utilizes a 52-53 week fiscal year ending on the Saturday closest to March 31. As such, fiscal year ~~2012~~2013 will end on March ~~31, 2012~~30, 2013 and will be a 52-week period (“Fiscal ~~2012”~~2013”). Fiscal year ~~2011~~2012 ended on ~~April 2, 2011~~March 31, 2012 and also reflected a 52-week period (“Fiscal ~~2011”~~2012”). Accordingly, the ~~third~~first quarter of Fiscal 2013 ended on June 30, 2012 and was a 13-week period. The first quarter of Fiscal 2012 ended on ~~December 31, 2011 and was a 13-week period. The third quarter of Fiscal 2011 ended on January 1,~~July 2, 2011 and was also a 13-week period.

Prior to the first quarter of Fiscal 2012, the financial position and operating results of the Company’s Japanese subsidiary, Ralph Lauren Corporation Japan (formerly “Polo Ralph Lauren Kabushiki Kaisha”) were reported on a one-month lag. During the first quarter of Fiscal 2012, the Company’s Japanese subsidiary changed its fiscal year to conform to the Company’s fiscal-year basis. The previously existing reporting lag was eliminated, as the lag was no longer required to achieve a timely consolidation due to the Company’s investments in technology to enhance its financial statement close process. The Company believes this change is preferable as it resulted in contemporaneous reporting of the subsidiary’s operating results. The Company has not retrospectively applied this change in accounting principle as the effect was not material to its previously reported annual and interim consolidated financial statements. The cumulative effect of this change was reflected within “Interest and other income, net” in the Company’s consolidated statement of operations, and increased the Company’s pretax income and net income by $1.0 million and $0.6 million, respectively, for the nine months ended December 31, 2011.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with US GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and footnotes thereto. Actual results could differ materially from those estimates.

Significant estimates inherent in the preparation of the consolidated financial statements include reserves for bad debt, customer returns, discounts, end-of-season markdowns and operational chargebacks; the realizability of inventory; reserves for litigation and other contingencies; useful lives and impairments of long-lived tangible and intangible assets; accounting for income taxes and related uncertain tax positions; the valuation of stock-based compensation and related expected forfeiture rates; reserves for restructuring; and accounting for business combinations.

Reclassifications

Certain reclassifications have been made to the prior periods’ financial information in order to conform to the current period’s presentation.

~~RALPH LAUREN CORPORATION~~

~~NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)~~

Seasonality of Business

The Company’s business is typically affected by seasonal trends, with higher levels of wholesale sales generated in its second and fourth quarters and higher retail sales generated in its second and third quarters. These trends result primarily from the timing of seasonal wholesale shipments and key vacation travel, back-to-school and holiday shopping periods in the Retail segment. In addition, fluctuations in sales, operating income and cash flows in any fiscal quarter may be influenced by other events affecting retail sales, such as changes in weather patterns. Accordingly, the Company’s operating results and cash flows for the three-month ~~and nine-month periods~~period ended ~~December 31, 2011~~June 30, 2012 are not necessarily indicative of the results and cash flows that may be expected for the full Fiscal ~~2012.~~2013.

3. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Revenue Recognition

Revenue is recognized across all segments of the business when there is persuasive evidence of an arrangement, delivery has occurred, price has been fixed or is determinable and collectability is reasonably assured.

RALPH LAUREN CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Revenue within the Company’s Wholesale segment is recognized at the time title passes and risk of loss is transferred to customers. Wholesale revenue is recorded net of estimates of returns, discounts, end-of-season markdown allowances, operational chargebacks and certain cooperative advertising allowances. Returns and allowances require pre-approval from management and discounts are based on trade terms. Estimates for end-of-season markdown reserves are based on historical trends, actual and forecasted seasonal results, an evaluation of current economic and market conditions, retailer performance and, in certain cases, contractual terms. Estimates for operational chargebacks are based on actual notifications of order fulfillment discrepancies and historical trends. The Company reviews and refines these estimates on at least a quarterly basis. The Company’s historical estimates of these costs have not differed materially from actual results.

Retail store and concessions-based shop-within-shop revenue is recognized net of estimated returns at the time of sale to consumers. E-commerce revenue from sales of products ordered through the Company’s retail Internet sites is recognized upon delivery and receipt of the shipment by its customers. Such revenue is also reduced by an estimate of returns.

Gift cards issued by the Company are recorded as a liability until they are redeemed, at which point revenue is recognized. The Company recognizes income for unredeemed gift cards when the likelihood of a gift card being redeemed by a customer is remote and the Company determines that it does not have a legal obligation to remit the value of the unredeemed gift card to the relevant jurisdiction as unclaimed or abandoned property.

Revenue from licensing arrangements is recognized when earned in accordance with the terms of the underlying agreements, generally based upon the higher of (a) contractually guaranteed minimum royalty levels or (b) actual sales and royalty data, or estimates thereof, received from the Company’s licensees.

The Company accounts for sales and other related taxes on a net basis, excluding such taxes from revenue.

Shipping and Handling Costs

The costs associated with shipping goods to customers are reflected as a component of selling, general and administrative (“SG&A”) expenses in the consolidated statements of operations. Shipping costs were ~~$8.3~~$7.6 million and ~~$26.6~~$8.2 million during the three-month ~~and nine-month~~ periods ended ~~December 31, 2011,~~

~~RALPH LAUREN CORPORATION~~

~~NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)~~

~~respectively,~~June 30, 2012 and ~~$7.8 million and $21.8 million during the three-month and nine-month periods ended January 1,~~July 2, 2011, respectively. The costs of preparing merchandise for sale, such as picking, packing, warehousing and order charges (“handling costs”) are also included in SG&A expenses. Handling costs were ~~$39.4~~$35.8 million and ~~$104.9~~$30.5 million during the three-month ~~and nine-month~~ periods ended ~~December 31, 2011, respectively,~~June 30, 2012 and ~~$28.6 million and $78.4 million during the three-month and nine-month periods ended January 1,~~July 2, 2011, respectively. Shipping and handling costs billed to customers are included in revenue.

Net Income per Common Share

Basic net income per common share is computed by dividing the net income applicable to common shares after preferred dividend requirements, if any, by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Weighted-average common shares include shares of the Company’s Class A and Class B common stock. Diluted net income per common share adjusts basic net income per common share for the effects of outstanding stock options, restricted stock, restricted stock units and any other potentially dilutive financial instruments, only in the periods in which such effect is dilutive under the treasury stock method.

RALPH LAUREN CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

The weighted-average number of common shares outstanding used to calculate basic net income per common share is reconciled to those shares used in calculating diluted net income per common share as follows:

		$000,000		$000,000		$000,000		$000,000
	Three Months Ended				Nine Months Ended				Three Months Ended
	December 31, 2011		January 1, 2011		December 31, 2011		January 1, 2011		June 30, 2012		July 2, 2011
	(millions)								(millions)
Basic		92.2		95.5		92.8		96.0		92.2		93.9
Dilutive effect of stock options, restricted stock and restricted stock units		2.7		2.6		2.8		2.7		2.9		2.9

Diluted shares		94.9		98.1		95.6		98.7		95.1		96.8

Options to purchase shares of common stock at an exercise price greater than the average market price of the common stock during the reporting period are anti-dilutive and therefore not included in the computation of diluted net income per common share. In addition, the Company has outstanding restricted stock units that are issuable only upon the achievement of certain service and/or performance goals. Performance-based restricted stock units are included in the computation of diluted shares only to the extent that the underlying performance conditions (a) are satisfied ~~prior to~~as of the end of the reporting period or (b) would be satisfied if the end of the reporting period were the end of the related contingency period and the result would be dilutive under the treasury stock method. As of ~~December 31, 2011~~each of June 30, 2012 and ~~January 1,~~July 2, 2011, there was an aggregate of approximately ~~0.8 million and~~ 0.4 million ~~respectively,~~ of additional shares issuable as of the end of each period upon the exercise of anti-dilutive options and the contingent vesting of performance-based restricted stock units that were excluded from the diluted share calculations.

Accounts Receivable

In the normal course of business, the Company extends credit to wholesale customers that satisfy defined credit criteria. Accounts receivable, net, ~~as shown~~is recorded at carrying value which approximates fair value, and is presented in the Company’s consolidated balance sheets is net of certain reserves and allowances. These reserves and allowances consist of (a) reserves for returns, discounts, end-of-season markdowns and operational chargebacks (seeRevenue Recognition for further discussion of the related accounting policies) and (b) allowances for doubtful accounts. ~~These reserves and allowances are discussed in further detail below.~~

A reserve for sales returns is determined based on an evaluation of current market conditions, historical returns experience and, in certain cases, contractual terms. Charges to increase the reserve are treated as reductions of revenue.

~~RALPH LAUREN CORPORATION~~

~~NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)~~

~~A reserve for trade discounts is determined based on open invoices where trade discounts have been extended to customers, and charges to increase the reserve are treated as reductions of revenue.~~

Estimated end-of-season markdown charges are included as reductions of revenue. The related markdown provisions are based on retail sales performance, seasonal negotiations with customers, historical and forecasted deduction trends, an evaluation of current economic and market conditions and, in certain cases, contractual terms.

A reserve for operational chargebacks represents various deductions by customers relating to individual shipments. Charges to increase this reserve, net of expected recoveries, are included as reductions of revenue. The reserve is based on actual notifications of order fulfillment discrepancies and past experience.

A rollforward of the activity in the Company’s ~~aggregate reserve~~reserves for returns, discounts, end-of-season markdowns and operational chargebacks is presented below:

		December 31,			December 31,			December 31,			December 31,
	Three Months Ended						Nine Months Ended						Three Months Ended
	December 31, 2011			January 1, 2011			December 31, 2011			January 1, 2011			June 30, 2012			July 2, 2011
	(millions)												(millions)
Beginning reserve balance	$	231.0		$	202.1		$	213.2		$	186.0		$	246.7		$	213.2
Amount charged against revenue to increase reserve		162.1			128.6			444.2			357.2			138.0			113.0
Amount credited against customer accounts to decrease reserve		(162.7	)		(123.9	)		(424.4	)		(337.2	)		(151.3	)		(131.8	)
Foreign currency translation		(4.5	)		(2.3	)		(7.1	)		(1.5	)		(5.7	)		2.7

Ending reserve balance	$	225.9		$	204.5		$	225.9		$	204.5		$	227.7		$	197.1

An allowance for doubtful accounts is determined through analysis of periodic aging of accounts receivable, assessments of collectability based on an evaluation of historical and anticipated trends, the financial condition of the Company’s customers and an evaluation of the impact of economic conditions, among other factors.

RALPH LAUREN CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

A rollforward of the activity in the Company’s allowance for doubtful accounts is presented below:

		December 31			December 31			December 31			December 31
	Three Months Ended						Nine Months Ended						Three Months Ended
	December 31, 2011			January 1, 2011			December 31, 2011			January 1, 2011			June 30, 2012			July 2, 2011
	(millions)												(millions)
Beginning reserve balance	$	17.2		$	20.1		$	17.7		$	20.1		$	16.0		$	17.7
Amount recorded to expense to increase (decrease) reserve^(a)		1.1			(0.6	)		2.0			0.7
Amount recorded to expense to increase reserve^(a)														1.0			0.3
Amount written off against customer accounts to decrease reserve		(1.2	)		(0.3	)		(2.3	)		(1.6	)		(0.6	)		(0.6	)
Foreign currency translation		(0.5	)		(0.3	)		(0.8	)		(0.3	)		(0.6	)		0.3

Ending reserve balance	$	16.6		$	18.9		$	16.6		$	18.9		$	15.8		$	17.7

^(a)

Amounts recorded to bad debt expense are included within SG&A expenses in the unaudited interim consolidated statements of operations.

~~RALPH LAUREN CORPORATION~~

~~NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)~~

Concentration of Credit Risk

The Company sells its wholesale merchandise primarily to major department and specialty stores across ~~the U.S., Canada,~~North America, Europe, Asia and South America, ~~and Asia,~~ and extends credit based on an evaluation of each customer’s financial capacity and condition, usually without requiring collateral. In the Company’s wholesale business, concentration of credit risk is relatively limited due to the large number of customers and their dispersion across many geographic areas. However, the Company has ~~four~~three key wholesale customers that generate significant sales volume. For Fiscal ~~2011,~~2012, these customers in the aggregate contributed approximately 40% of all ~~wholesale~~Wholesale revenues. Further, as of ~~December 31, 2011,~~June 30, 2012, the Company’s ~~four~~three key wholesale customers represented approximately ~~30%~~25% of gross accounts receivable.

Derivative Financial Instruments

The Company records all derivative instruments on the consolidated balance sheets at fair value. In addition, for derivative instruments that qualify for hedge accounting, the effective portion of changes in their fair value is either (a) offset against the changes in fair value of the hedged assets, liabilities or firm commitments through earnings or (b) recognized in equity as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) (“AOCI”) until the hedged item is recognized in earnings, depending on whether the derivative is being used to hedge changes in fair value or cash flows, respectively.

Each derivative instrument entered into by the Company which qualifies for hedge accounting is expected to be highly effective at reducing the risk associated with the exposure being hedged. For each derivative that is designated as a hedge, the Company formally documents the related risk management objective and strategy, including the identification of the hedging instrument, the hedged item and the risk exposure, as well as how effectiveness ~~is to~~will be assessed prospectively and retrospectively. To assess the effectiveness of derivative instruments that are designated as hedges, the Company uses non-statistical methods, including the dollar-offset method, which compare the change in the fair value of the derivative to the change in the fair value or cash flows of the hedged item. The extent to which a hedging instrument has been and is expected to continue to be effective at achieving offsetting changes in fair value or cash flows is assessed and documented by the Company on at least a quarterly basis.

To the extent that a derivative contract designated as a cash flow hedge is not considered to be effective, any changes in fair value relating to the ineffective portion are immediately recognized in earnings within foreign currency gains (losses). If it is determined that a derivative has not been highly effective, and will continue not to be highly effective at hedging the designated exposure, hedge accounting is discontinued. If a hedge relationship

RALPH LAUREN CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

is terminated, the change in fair value of the derivative previously recorded in AOCI is recognized when the hedged item affects earnings consistent with the original hedging strategy, unless the forecasted transaction is no longer probable of occurring in which case the accumulated amount is immediately recognized in ~~earnings.~~earnings within foreign currency gains (losses).

As a result of the use of derivative instruments, the Company is exposed to the risk that counterparties to derivative contracts will fail to meet their contractual obligations. To mitigate the counterparty credit risk, the Company has a policy of only entering into contracts with carefully selected financial institutions based upon an evaluation of their credit ratings and certain other financial factors, adhering to established limits for credit exposure. The Company’s established policies and procedures for mitigating credit risk onfrom derivative transactions include continually reviewing and assessing the creditworthiness of counterparties. The Company also enters into master netting arrangements with counterparties when possible to mitigate credit risk associated with its derivative instruments, which in certain instances allow the Company to net settle amounts owed under multiple derivative transactions with the same counterparty. However, the fair values of the Company’s derivative instruments are recorded on its consolidated balance sheets on a gross basis.

For cash flow reporting purposes, the Company classifies proceeds received or amounts paid upon the settlement of a derivative instrument in the same manner as the related item being hedged.

~~RALPH LAUREN CORPORATION~~

~~NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)~~

Forward Foreign Currency Exchange Contracts

The Company primarily enters into forward foreign currency exchange contracts as hedges to reduce its risk from exchange rate fluctuations on inventory purchases, intercompany royalty payments made by certain of its international operations, intercompany contributions to fund certain marketing efforts of its international operations, interest payments made in connection with outstanding debt and other foreign currency-denominated operational cash flows. To the extent foreign currency exchange contracts designated as cash flow hedges ~~at hedge inception~~ are highly effective in offsetting the change in the value of the hedged item, the related gains (losses) are initially deferred in equity as a component of AOCI and subsequently recognized in the consolidated statements of operations as follows:

•

Forecasted Inventory Purchases — Recognized as part of the cost of the inventory purchases being hedged within cost of goods sold when the related inventory is sold.

•

Intercompany Royalty Payments and Marketing Contributions — Recognized within foreign currency gains (losses) generally in the period in which the related royalties or marketing contributions being hedged are received or paid.

•

Interest Payments on Euro Debt — Recognized within foreign currency gains (losses) in the period in which the recorded liability impacts earnings due to foreign currency exchange remeasurement.

Hedge of a Net Investment in a Foreign Operation

Changes in the fair value of a derivative instrument or a non-derivative financial instrument (such as debt) that is designated as a hedge of a net investment in a foreign operation are reported in the same manner as a translation adjustment to the extent it is effective as a hedge. In assessing the effectiveness of a non-derivative financial instrument that has been designated as a hedge of a net investment, the Company uses the spot rate method of accounting to value foreign currency exchange rate changes in both its foreign subsidiaries and the financial instrument. If the notional amount of the financial instrument designated as a hedge of a net investment

RALPH LAUREN CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

is greater than the portion of the net investment being hedged, hedge ineffectiveness is recognized immediately in earnings within foreign currency gains (losses). To the extent the financial instrument remains effective, changes in its fair value are recorded in equity as a component of AOCI until the sale or liquidation of the hedged net investment.

Fair Value Hedges

Changes in the fair value of a derivative instrument that has been designated as a fair value hedge, along with offsetting changes in the fair value of the hedged item attributable to the hedged risk, are recorded in earnings. Hedge ineffectiveness is recorded in earnings to the extent that the change in the fair value of the hedged item does not offset the change in the fair value of the hedging instrument.

Undesignated Hedges

All of the Company’s undesignated hedges are entered into to hedge specific economic risks, such as foreign currency exchange rate risk. Changes in the fair value of undesignated derivative instruments are immediately recognized in earnings within foreign currency gains (losses).

See Note 1211 for further discussion of the Company’s derivative financial instruments.

For a summary of all of the Company’s significant accounting policies, refer to Note 3 to the audited consolidated financial statements included in the Company’s Fiscal ~~2011~~2012 10-K.

4. Recently Issued Accounting Standards

Disclosure of Offsetting Assets and Liabilities

In December 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued new, expanded disclosure requirements for financial instruments surrounding an entity’s rights of offset and related counterparty

~~RALPH LAUREN CORPORATION~~

~~NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)~~

arrangements as Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2011-11, “Disclosures about Offsetting Assets and Liabilities” (“ASU 2011-11”). ASU 2011-11 requires disclosure of both “gross” and “net” information for recognized financial instruments (including derivatives) that are (i) eligible for offset and presented “net” in the balance sheet or (ii) subject to enforceable master netting agreements, irrespective of whether an entity actually offsets and “net presents” such instruments in the balance sheet. ASU 2011-11 also requires disclosure of any collateral received or posted in connection with master netting agreements or similar arrangements. ASU 2011-11 requires retrospective application, and is effective for the Company as of the beginning of ~~fiscal year~~Fiscal 2014. The application of ASU 2011-11 is expected to expand the Company’s quarterly and annual financial instrument disclosures, but will not have an impact on its consolidated financial statements.

Goodwill Impairment Testing

In September 2011, the FASB issued revised guidance for goodwill impairment testing as ASU No. 2011-08, “Testing Goodwill for Impairment” (“ASU 2011-08”). ASU 2011-08 simplifies goodwill impairment testing by providing entities with the option of performing a qualitative assessment to determine whether it is ~~more likely than not~~more-likely-than-not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount. The results of such assessment may be used as a basis for determining whether it is necessary to perform the two-step quantitative impairment test ~~currently~~ required under Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) topic 350, “Intangibles –— Goodwill and Other.” ASU 2011-08 is effective for the Company’s Fiscal 2013 annual goodwill impairment testing, ~~beginning in~~which will be performed during the second fiscal ~~year 2013.~~quarter. The application of ASU 2011-08 is not expected to have an impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

RALPH LAUREN CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Presentation of Comprehensive Income

In June 2011, the FASB issued revised guidance on the presentation of comprehensive income as ASU No. 2011-05, “Comprehensive Income: Presentation of Comprehensive Income” (“ASU 2011-05”). ASU 2011-05 eliminates the option to present the components of other comprehensive income (“OCI”) as part of the consolidated statement of equity and provides two alternatives for presenting the components of net income and OCI, either: (i) in a single continuous statement of comprehensive income or (ii) in two separate but consecutive financial statements, consisting of an income statement followed by a separate statement of comprehensive income. Additionally, this guidance requires items that are reclassified from AOCI to net income to be presented on the face of the financial statements. However, in December 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-12, “Deferral of the Effective Date for Amendments to the Presentation of Reclassifications of Items Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income in Accounting Standards Update No. 2011-05,” which deferred this ~~requirement. ASU 2011-05 requires retrospective application,~~requirement and ~~is effective for~~plans to issue a new exposure draft on this issue. The Company adopted the ~~Company as of the beginning of fiscal year 2013. The application~~provisions of ASU 2011-05 ~~is not expected to have an impact on~~during the ~~Company’s consolidated financial statements, but will result in a change in the presentation of the Company’s consolidated statements of operations and equity.~~

~~Fair Value Measurements~~

In May 2011, the FASB issued new guidance to improve and align fair value measurement and disclosure requirements as ASU No. 2011-04, “Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP and IFRSs” (“ASU 2011-04”). ASU 2011-04 amends and clarifies certain existing fair value measurements guidance, including limiting the “highest and best use” concept to nonfinancial assets, permitting certain financial assets and liabilities with offsetting positions in market or counterparty credit risks to be measured on a net basis and providing guidance on the use of premiums and discounts. ASU 2011-04 also expands the disclosure requirements for Level 3 fair value measurements, including for transfers into and out of Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy, and in instances where the use of a nonfinancial asset differs from its “highest

~~RALPH LAUREN CORPORATION~~

~~NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)~~

and best use.” In addition, ASU 2011-04 requires disclosure of the fair value hierarchy level for financial instruments not measured at fair value but for which disclosure of fair value is required. ASU 2011-04 requires prospective application, and is effective for the Company beginning in the fourthfirst quarter of Fiscal ~~2012. The application~~2013, which resulted in the inclusion of ~~ASU 2011-04 is expected to expand the Company’s quarterly and annual disclosures, but will not have an impact on~~separate statements of comprehensive income for all periods presented within its consolidated financial statements.

Proposed Amendments to Current Accounting Standards

The FASB is currently working on amendments to existing accounting standards governing a number of areas including, but not limited to, accounting for leases. In August 2010, the FASB issued an exposure draft, “Leases” (the “Exposure Draft”), which would replace the existing guidance in ASC topic 840, “Leases.” Under the Exposure Draft, among other changes in practice, a lessee’s rights and obligations under all leases, including existing and new arrangements, would be recognized as assets and liabilities, respectively, on the balance sheet. Subsequent to the end of the related comment period, the FASB made several amendments to the Exposure Draft, including (i) revising the definition of the “lease term” to include the non-cancelable lease term plus only those option periods for which there is significant economic incentive for the lessee to extend or not terminate the ~~lease. The FASB also redefined~~lease; (ii) redefining the initial lease liability to be recorded on the Company’s balance sheet to contemplate only those variable lease payments that are in substance ~~“fixed.”~~“fixed”; and (iii) developing a principle to determine whether lease expense will be recognized on a straight-line or accelerated basis, which considers the nature of the underlying leased asset. The FASB ~~is continuing~~continues to ~~re-deliberate its tentative decisions made to date~~deliberate on this matter and ~~is planning~~currently plans to issue a revised exposure draft for comment in ~~mid-2012. When and if~~November 2012. If effective as currently planned, this proposed standard will likely have a significant impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements. However, as the standard-setting process is still ongoing, the Company is unable at this time to determine the impact this proposed change in accounting will have on its consolidated financial ~~statements at this time.~~statements.

5. ~~Acquisitions~~Inventories

~~South Korea Licensed Operations Acquisition~~

~~On January 1, 2011, in connection with the transition~~Inventories consist of the Ralph Lauren-branded apparel and accessories business in South Korea (the “Ralph Lauren South Korea business”) from a licensed to a wholly owned operation, the Company acquired certain net assets (including inventory) and employees from Doosan Corporation (“Doosan”) in exchange for an initial payment of approximately $25 million plus an additional aggregate payment of approximately $22 million (the “South Korea Licensed Operations Acquisition”). Doosan was the Company’s licensee for the Ralph Lauren South Korea business. The Company funded the South Korea Licensed Operations Acquisition with available cash on-hand. In conjunction with the South Korea Licensed Operations Acquisition, the Company also entered into a transition services agreement with Doosan for the provision of certain financial and information systems services, which was subsequently extended through June 30, 2012.following:

The Company accounted for the South Korea Licensed Operations Acquisition as a business combination during the third quarter of Fiscal 2011. The acquisition cost of $47 million (excluding transaction costs) has been allocated to the net assets acquired based on their respective fair values as follows: inventory of $8 million; property and equipment of $7 million; customer relationship intangible asset of $26 million; other net assets of $3 million; and non tax-deductible goodwill of $3 million. Goodwill represents the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of net tangible and identifiable intangible assets acquired. Transaction costs of $3 million were expensed as incurred and classified within SG&A expenses in the consolidated statement of operations during Fiscal 2011.


	June 30, 2012		March 31, 2012		July 2, 2011
	(millions)
Raw materials	$	9.4	$	5.1	$	9.2
Work-in-process		1.5		1.1		1.5
Finished goods		953.2		835.4		885.6

Total inventories	$	964.1	$	841.6	$	896.3

RALPH LAUREN CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

The customer relationship intangible asset was valued using the excess earnings method. This approach discounts the estimated after tax cash flows associated with the existing base of customers as of the acquisition date, factoring in expected attrition of the existing customer base. The customer relationship intangible asset is being amortized over its estimated useful life of ten years.

~~The operating results for the Ralph Lauren South Korea business have been consolidated in the Company’s operating results commencing on January 1, 2011.~~

6. ~~Inventories~~

~~Inventories consist of the following:~~

$000,000,00 $000,000,00 $000,000,00
   December 31,
2011    April 2,
2011    January 1,
2011

(millions)

Raw materials
   $ 6.8       $ 7.5       $ 5.7
Work-in-process
   0.8       1.8       1.4
Finished goods
   887.1       692.8       690.6






Total inventories
   $ 894.7       $ 702.1       $ 697.7

7. Property and Equipment

Property and equipment, net, ~~consist~~consists of the following:

		$000,000,00			$000,000,00
	December 31, 2011			April 2, 2011			June 30, 2012			March 31, 2012
	(millions)						(millions)
Land and improvements	$	9.9		$	9.9		$	9.9		$	9.9
Buildings and improvements		117.4			115.3			116.3			115.9
Furniture and fixtures		558.8			490.9			566.9			561.8
Machinery and equipment		155.2			144.4			170.5			157.4
Capitalized software		186.8			165.4			226.5			213.6
Leasehold improvements		879.6			826.3			923.9			915.0
Construction in progress		56.7			58.1			66.3			84.9

		1,964.4			1,810.3			2,080.3			2,058.5
Less: accumulated depreciation		(1,137.9	)		(1,021.5	)		(1,210.6	)		(1,174.4	)

Property and equipment, net	$	826.5		$	788.8		$	869.7		$	884.1

~~RALPH LAUREN CORPORATION~~

~~NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)~~

~~8. Other Current Assets~~7. Accrued Expenses and Other Current Liabilities

~~Prepaid expenses and other current assets consist of the following:~~

December 31, December 31,
December 31,
2011       April 2,
2011
(millions)
Prepaid rent expense
$ 23.3       $ 23.9
Restricted cash
14.4       8.5
Derivative financial instruments
30.3       2.0
Other taxes receivable
19.4       30.5
Prepaid samples
19.8       17.1
Other prepaid expenses and current assets
70.6       54.3



Total prepaid expenses and other current assets
$ 177.8       $ 136.3

Accrued expenses and other current liabilities consist of the following:

		December 31,		December 31,
	December 31, 2011		April 2, 2011		June 30, 2012		March 31, 2012
	(millions)				(millions)
Accrued operating expenses	$	168.3	$	167.0	$	163.7	$	175.7
Accrued payroll and benefits		180.5		209.3		112.5		227.7
Accrued inventory		148.8		132.0		201.8		108.0
Accrued capital expenditures		48.7		8.6		30.2		45.4
Deferred income		40.9		46.8		47.3		50.3
Other taxes payable		51.1		66.2		47.9		47.1
Other accrued expenses and current liabilities		28.4		51.9		58.0		39.5

Total accrued expenses and other current liabilities	$	666.7	$	681.8	$	661.4	$	693.7

9.8. Income Taxes

Uncertain Income Tax Benefits

A reconciliation of the beginning and ending amounts of unrecognized tax benefits, excluding interest and penalties, for the three-month ~~and nine-month~~ periods ended ~~December 31, 2011~~June 30, 2012 and ~~January 1,~~July 2, 2011 is presented below:

		December 31,			December 31,			December 31,			December 31,
	Three Months Ended						Nine Months Ended						Three Months Ended
	December 31, 2011			January 1, 2011			December 31, 2011			January 1, 2011			June 30, 2012			July 2, 2011
				(millions)									(millions)
Unrecognized tax benefits beginning balance	$	124.8		$	118.7		$	125.0		$	96.2		$	129.0		$	125.0
Additions related to current period tax positions		0.7			0.4			2.6			2.5			0.8			1.0
Additions related to prior period tax positions		3.1			2.7			3.3			30.0			0.2			0.1
Reductions related to prior period tax positions		(0.3	)		(5.8	)		(1.0	)		(14.0	)		(1.2	)		(0.4	)
Reductions related to settlements with taxing authorities		—			(2.1	)		—			(2.1	)
Additions (reductions) related to foreign currency translation		(2.3	)		(1.0	)		(3.9	)		0.3			(2.7	)		1.3

Unrecognized tax benefits ending balance	$	126.0		$	112.9		$	126.0		$	112.9		$	126.1		$	127.0

RALPH LAUREN CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

The Company classifies interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits as part of its provision for income taxes. A reconciliation of the beginning and ending amounts of accrued interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits for the three-month ~~and nine-month~~ periods ended ~~December 31, 2011~~June 30, 2012 and ~~January 1,~~July 2, 2011 is presented below:

		December 31,			December 31,			December 31,			December 31,
	Three Months Ended						Nine Months Ended						Three Months Ended
	December 31, 2011			January 1, 2011			December 31, 2011			January 1, 2011			June 30, 2012			July 2, 2011
				(millions)									(millions)
Accrued interest and penalties beginning balance	$	35.4		$	32.6		$	31.4		$	29.8		$	39.0		$	31.4
Net additions charged to expense		1.8			1.8			5.9			6.5			1.5			2.0
Reductions related to prior period tax positions		—			(2.4	)		—			(4.5	)		(2.1	)		—
Additions (reductions) related to foreign currency translation		(0.4	)		(0.2	)		(0.5	)		—			(0.3	)		0.4

Accrued interest and penalties ending balance	$	36.8		$	31.8		$	36.8		$	31.8		$	38.1		$	33.8

The total amount of unrecognized tax benefits, including interest and penalties, was ~~$162.8~~$164.2 million as of ~~December 31, 2011~~June 30, 2012 and ~~$156.4~~$168.0 million as of ~~April 2, 2011~~March 31, 2012 and is included within non-current liability for unrecognized tax benefits in the consolidated balance sheets. The total amount of unrecognized tax benefits that, if recognized, would affect the Company’s effective tax rate was ~~$115.8~~$116.4 million as of ~~December 31, 2011.~~June 30, 2012.

Future Changes in Unrecognized Tax Benefits

The total amount of unrecognized tax benefits relating to the Company’s tax positions is subject to change based on future events including, but not limited to, the settlements of ongoing audits and/or the expiration of applicable statutes of limitations. Although the outcomes and timing of such events are highly uncertain, it is reasonably possible that the balance of gross unrecognized tax benefits, excluding interest and penalties, could potentially be reduced by up to approximately $30 million during the next 12 months. However, changes in the occurrence, expected outcomes and timing of those events could cause the Company’s current estimate to change materially in the future.

The Company files tax returns in the U.S. federal and various state, local and foreign jurisdictions. With few exceptions for those tax returns, the Company is no longer subject to examinations by the relevant tax authorities for years prior to Fiscal 2004.

~~10.~~9. Debt

Euro Debt

As of ~~December 31, 2011,~~June 30, 2012, the Company had outstanding €209.2 million principal amount of 4.5% notes due October 4, 2013 (the “Euro Debt”). The Company has the option to redeem all of the outstanding Euro Debt at any time at a redemption price equal to the principal amount plus a premium. The Company also has the option to redeem all of the outstanding Euro Debt at any time at par plus accrued interest in the event of certain developments involving U.S. tax law. Partial redemption of the Euro Debt is not permitted in either instance. In the event of a change of control of the Company, each holder of the Euro Debt has the option to require the Company to redeem the Euro Debt at its principal amount plus accrued interest. The indenture governing the Euro Debt (the “Indenture”) contains certain limited covenants that restrict the Company’s ability, subject to specified exceptions, to incur liens or enter into a sale and leaseback transaction for any principal property. The Indenture does not contain any financial covenants.

As of June 30, 2012, the carrying value of the Euro Debt was $261.0 million, compared to $274.4 million as of March 31, 2012.

RALPH LAUREN CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

~~As of December 31, 2011, the carrying value of the Euro Debt was $265.6 million, compared to $291.9 million as of April 2, 2011.~~

Revolving Credit Facilities

Global Credit Facility

The Company has a credit facility that provides for a $500 million senior unsecured revolving line of credit through March 2016, also used to support the issuance of letters of credit (the “Global Credit Facility”). Borrowings under the Global Credit Facility may be denominated in U.S. ~~dollars~~Dollars and other currencies, including Euros, Hong Kong Dollars and Japanese Yen. The Company has the ability to expand its borrowing availability to $750 million, subject to the agreement of one or more new or existing lenders under the facility to increase their commitments. There are no mandatory reductions in borrowing ability throughout the term of the Global Credit Facility.

~~In November 2011, the Company repaid $100.0 million in borrowings that were previously outstanding under the Global Credit Facility.~~ As of ~~December 31, 2011,~~June 30, 2012, there were no borrowings outstanding under the Global Credit Facility and the Company was contingently liable for ~~$15.8~~$15.0 million of outstanding letters of credit.

The Global Credit Facility contains a number of covenants that, among other things, restrict the Company’s ability, subject to specified exceptions, to incur additional debt; incur liens, sell or dispose of assets; merge with or acquire other companies; liquidate or dissolve itself; engage in businesses that are not in a related line of business; make loans, advances, or guarantees; engage in transactions with affiliates; and make investments. The Global Credit Facility also requires the Company to maintain a maximum ratio of Adjusted Debt to Consolidated EBITDAR (the “leverage ratio”) of no greater than 3.75 as of the date of measurement for the four most recent consecutive fiscal quarters. Adjusted Debt is defined generally as consolidated debt outstanding plus 8 times consolidated rent expense for the last four consecutive fiscal quarters. Consolidated EBITDAR is defined generally as consolidated net income plus (i) income tax expense, (ii) net interest expense, (iii) depreciation and amortization expense and (iv) consolidated rent expense. As of ~~December 31, 2011,~~June 30, 2012, no Event of Default (as such term is defined pursuant to the Global Credit Facility) has occurred under the Company’s Global Credit Facility.

Chinese Credit Facility

~~The~~On April 11, 2012, Ralph Lauren Trading (Shanghai) Co., Ltd., a subsidiary of the Company, ~~also has an~~entered into a new uncommitted credit facility ~~in China~~with JPMorgan Chase Bank (China) Company Limited, Shanghai Branch (the “Bank”) that provides for a revolving line of credit of up to 100 million Chinese Renminbi (approximately $16 million) through April 10, 2013 (the “Chinese Credit Facility”). The Chinese Credit Facility replaced the Company’s previous credit facility, which provided for a revolving line of credit of up to 70 million Chinese Renminbi (approximately $11 ~~million as of December 31, 2011) through February 9, 2012~~million) (the ~~“Chinese~~“Prior Chinese Credit Facility”). ~~The~~Consistent with the Prior Chinese Credit Facility, isthe Chinese Credit Facility will be used to fund general working capital needs of the Company’s operations in China. The Chinese Credit Facility may also be used to support bank guarantees. As of June 30, 2012, there were no borrowings outstanding under the Chinese Credit Facility.

The borrowing availability under the Chinese Credit Facility is determined at the sole discretion of ~~JPMorgan Chase~~the Bank ~~(China) Company Limited, Shanghai Branch (the “Bank”)~~ and is subject to availability of the Bank’s funds and satisfaction of certain regulatory requirements. Borrowings under the Chinese Credit Facility are guaranteed by ~~RLC~~the Company and bear interest at either (i) at least ~~90%~~95% of the short-term interest rate published by the People’s Bank of China or (ii) a rate determined by the Bank at its discretion based on prevailing market conditions. The Chinese Credit Facility does not contain any financial covenants. ~~There were no borrowings outstanding under the Chinese Credit Facility as of December 31, 2011.~~

~~The Company plans to renew the Chinese Credit Facility at or around its maturity date of February 9, 2012 on similar terms as the existing facility, subject to prevailing market conditions.~~

Refer to Note 14 of the Fiscal ~~2011~~2012 10-K for detailed disclosure of the terms and conditions of the Company’s debt and credit facilities.

RALPH LAUREN CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

~~11.~~10. Fair Value Measurements

US GAAP establishes a three-level valuation hierarchy for disclosure of fair value measurements. The determination of the applicable level within the hierarchy of a particular asset or liability depends on the inputs used in its valuation as of the measurement date, notably the extent to which the inputs are market-based (observable) or ~~internally derived~~internally-derived (unobservable). The three levels are defined as follows:

•

Level 1 — inputs to the valuation methodology based on quoted prices (unadjusted) for identical assets or liabilities in active markets.

•

Level 2 — inputs to the valuation methodology based on quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets for substantially the full term of the financial instrument; quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active for substantially the full term of the financial instrument; and model-derived valuations whose inputs or significant value drivers are observable.

•

Level 3 — inputs to the valuation methodology based on unobservable prices or valuation techniques that are significant to the fair value measurement.

A financial instrument’s categorization within the valuation hierarchy is based upon the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement.

The following table summarizes the Company’s financial assets and liabilities that are measured and recorded at fair value on a recurring basis:


	December 31, 2011		April 2, 2011		June 30, 2012		March 31, 2012
	(millions)				(millions)
Financial assets carried at fair value^(a) :
Financial assets recorded at fair value^(a) :
Government bonds — U.S.	$	11.0	$	100.4	$	66.9	$	59.4
Government bonds — non-U.S.		85.2		—		111.5		96.0
Corporate bonds — non-U.S.		85.3		—		74.0		99.0
Variable rate municipal securities — U.S.		42.9		14.5		84.0		69.2
Auction rate securities		2.3		2.3		2.3		2.3
Other securities		0.4		0.5		0.4		0.5
Derivative financial instruments		39.7		2.0		35.6		32.5

Total	$	266.8	$	119.7	$	374.7	$	358.9

Financial liabilities carried at fair value^(b) :
Financial liabilities recorded at fair value^(b) :
Derivative financial instruments	$	4.9	$	17.8	$	7.5	$	2.6

Total	$	4.9	$	17.8	$	7.5	$	2.6

^(a)

Based on Level 1 measurements, except for auction rate securities and derivative financial instruments, which are based on Level 2 measurements.

^(b)

Based on Level 2 measurements.

Certain of the Company’s government bonds, and all of ~~the Company’s~~its corporate bonds and variable rate municipal securities (“VRMS”) are classified as available-for-sale securities and are recorded at fair value in the Company’s consolidated balance sheets based upon quoted ~~market~~ prices in active markets.

RALPH LAUREN CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

The Company’s auction rate securities are classified as available-for-sale securities and are recorded at fair value in the Company’s consolidated balance sheets. Third-party pricing institutions may value auction rate securities at par, which may not necessarily reflect prices that would be obtained in the current market. When quoted market prices are unobservable, fair value is estimated based on a number of known factors and external pricing data, including known maturity dates, the coupon rate based upon the most recent reset market clearing rate, the price/yield representing the average rate of ~~recently successful~~recent successfully traded securities and the total principal balance of each security.

~~Derivative~~The Company’s derivative financial instruments are recorded at fair value in the Company’s consolidated balance sheets and are valued using a pricing model, primarily based on market observable external inputs including forward and spot rates for foreign currencies, which considers the impact of the Company’s own credit risk, if any. Changes in counterparty credit risk are also considered in the valuation of derivative financial instruments.

~~Cash~~The Company’s cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash ~~investments classified as~~and held-to-maturity ~~and accounts receivable~~investments are recorded at carrying value, which approximates fair ~~value.~~ value, based on Level 1 measurements.

The Company’s Euro Debt ~~(adjusted~~is recorded at carrying value in the Company’s consolidated balance sheets, adjusted for foreign currency fluctuations, any unamortized discount, and changes in the ~~loss on~~fair value of any outstanding interest rate swaps and unamortized gains (losses) incurred upon the termination of such swaps (see Note 11), which may differ from its fair value. The fair value of the ~~Company’s preexisting~~Euro Debt is estimated based on external pricing data, including available quoted market prices of the Euro Debt and of comparable European debt instruments with similar interest ~~rate swap, as discussed in Note 12)~~rates, credit ratings and ~~investments in equity method investees are also reported at~~trading frequency, among other factors. The following table summarizes the carrying ~~value. However, other than differences in~~value and the estimated fair value of the Company’s Euro Debt:


	June 30, 2012				March 31, 2012
	Carrying Value		Fair Value^(a)		Carrying Value		Fair Value^(a)
	(millions)
Euro Debt	$	261.0	$	269.2	$	274.4	$	289.4

^(a)

Based on Level 2 measurements.

Unrealized gains or losses on the Company’s Euro Debt do not result in the ~~differences between fair value and carrying value were not significant as~~realization or expenditure of ~~December 31, 2011 or April 2, 2011.~~cash, unless the debt is retired prior to its maturity.

The Company’s non-financial instruments, which primarily consist of goodwill, other intangible assets and property and equipment, are not required to be measured at fair value on a recurring basis and are reported at carrying value. However, on a periodic basis whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that their carrying value may not be fully recoverable (and at least annually for goodwill), non-financial instruments are assessed for impairment and, if applicable, written-down to and recorded at fair value, considering external market participant assumptions.

~~12.~~11. Financial Instruments

Derivative Financial Instruments

The Company is primarily exposed to changes in foreign currency exchange rates relating to certain anticipated cash flows from its international operations and potential declines in the value of reported net assets of certain of its foreign operations, as well as changes in the fair value of its fixed-rate debt relating to changes in interest rates. Consequently, the Company periodically uses derivative financial instruments to manage such risks. The Company does not enter into derivative transactions for speculative or trading purposes.

RALPH LAUREN CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

The following table summarizes the Company’s outstanding derivative instruments on a gross basis as recorded ~~on its~~in the consolidated balance sheets as of ~~December~~June 30, 2012 and March 31, ~~2011 and April 2, 2011:~~2012:


	Notional Amounts				Derivative Assets							Derivative Liabilities								Notional Amounts				Derivative Assets							Derivative Liabilities
Derivative Instrument^(a)	December 31, 2011		April 2, 2011		Balance Sheet Line^(b)	Fair Value		Balance Sheet Line^(b)		Fair Value		Balance Sheet Line^(b)	Fair Value			Balance Sheet Line^(b)	Fair Value			June 30, 2012		March 31, 2012		Balance Sheet Line^(b)	Fair Value		Balance Sheet Line^(b)		Fair Value		Balance Sheet Line^(b)	Fair Value			Balance Sheet Line^(b)	Fair Value
					December 31, 2011			April 2, 2011				December 31, 2011				April 2, 2011								June 30, 2012			March 31, 2012				June 30, 2012				March 31, 2012
	(millions)																										(millions)
Designated Hedges:
FC — Inventory purchases	$	499.7	$	342.4	^(c)	$	34.6		PP	$	1.1	AE	$	(3.1	)	AE	$	(9.4	)	$	450.0	$	482.2	PP	$	32.6		PP	$	26.6	^(c)	$	(2.7	)	AE	$	(1.4	)
FC — I/C royalty payments		97.3		46.8	PP		3.3		—		—	^(d)		(0.4	)	AE		(3.6	)		106.3		70.0	PP		1.3		PP		4.8	AE		(1.2	)	—		—
FC — Interest payments		12.6		9.3	—		—		PP		0.4	AE		(0.3	)	—		—			12.6		12.6	—		—		—		—	AE		(0.6	)	AE		—	^(d)
FC — Other		27.2		29.6	PP		0.1		PP		0.5	AE		(0.6	)	AE		(0.1	)		39.3		8.3	PP		0.3		—		—	AE		(0.2	)	AE		(0.3	)
IRS — Euro Debt		—		295.5	—		—		—		—	—		—		ONCL		(3.3	)
NI — Euro Debt		265.6		291.9	—		—		—		—	LTD		(280.0	)^(e)	LTD		(305.0	)^(e)		261.0		274.4	—		—		—		—	LTD		(269.2	)^(e)	LTD		(289.4	)^(e)
NI — Other																					1.2		—	—		—		—		—	AE		—	^(f)	—		—

Total Designated Hedges	$	902.4	$	1,015.5		$	38.0			$	2.0		$	(284.4	)		$	(321.4	)	$	870.4	$	847.5		$	34.2			$	31.4		$	(273.9	)		$	(291.1	)

Undesignated Hedges:
FC — Other	$	60.2	$	40.0	^(f)	$	1.7		—	$	—	AE	$	(0.5	)	^(g)	$	(1.4	)	$	180.7	$	158.1	^(g)	$	1.4		^(h)	$	1.1	⁽ⁱ⁾	$	(2.8	)	^(j)	$	(0.9	)

Total Hedges	$	962.6	$	1,055.5		$	39.7			$	2.0		$	(284.9	)		$	(322.8	)	$	1,051.1	$	1,005.6		$	35.6			$	32.5		$	(276.7	)		$	(292.0	)

^(a)	FC = Forward exchange contracts for the sale or purchase of foreign currencies; ~~IRS = Interest Rate Swap;~~ NI = Net Investment Hedge; Euro Debt = Euro-denominated 4.5% notes due October 4, 2013.

^{^(b)}

PP = Prepaid expenses and other; OA = Other assets; AE = Accrued expenses and other; ONCL = Other non-current liabilities; LTD = Long-term debt.

^{^(c)}

$~~26.6 million included within PP and $8.0 million included within OA.~~

^(d)	~~$0.3~~2.2 million included within AE and ~~$0.1~~$0.5 million included within ONCL.

^{^(e)(d)}

The fair value of the interest payment-related derivative instrument was less than $0.1 million as of March 31, 2012.

^(e)	The Company’s Euro Debt is reported at carrying value in the Company’s consolidated balance sheets. The carrying value of the Euro Debt was ~~$265.6~~$261.0 million as of ~~December 31, 2011~~June 30, 2012 and ~~$291.9~~$274.4 million as of ~~April 2, 2011.~~March 31, 2012.

^(f^(f))

The fair value of the net investment hedge was less than $0.1 million as of June 30, 2012.

^(g⁾	$~~0.3~~0.9 million included within PP and ~~$1.4~~$0.5 million included within OA.

^(g)(h⁾

$0.7 million included within PP and $0.4 million included within OA.

⁽ⁱ⁾	$~~0.4~~2.7 million included within AE and ~~$1.0~~$0.1 million included within ONCL.

^(j)	$0.8 million included within AE and $0.1 million included within ONCL.

RALPH LAUREN CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

The following tables summarize the impact of the Company’s derivative instruments on its unaudited interim consolidated financial statements for the three-month ~~and nine-month~~ periods ended ~~December 31, 2011~~June 30, 2012 and ~~January 1,~~July 2, 2011:

000000000000 000000000000 000000000000 000000000000
Derivative Instrument^(a)
Gains (Losses) Recognized in OCI^(b)
Three Months Ended Nine Months Ended
December 31,
2011 January 1,
2011 December 31,
2011 January 1,
2011

(millions)
Designated Cash Flow Hedges:


FC — Inventory purchases
$ 11.3    $ 1.2    $ 35.1    $ (0.6 )
FC — I/C royalty payments
1.3    0.7    5.4    (6.8 )
FC — Interest payments
(0.1 ) 0.6    (0.5 ) 0.6
FC — Other
—    (0.3 ) (1.0 ) 0.3

$ 12.5    $ 2.2    $ 39.0    $ (6.5 )

Designated Hedge of Net Investment:

Euro Debt
$ 8.9    $ 8.5    $ 24.3    $ 5.8

Total Designated Hedges
$ 21.4    $ 10.7    $ 63.3    $ (0.7 )

000000000000 000000000000 000000000000 000000000000 000000000000
Gains (Losses) Reclassified from AOCI^(b)to Earnings
Location of Gains (Losses)
    Reclassified from AOCI^(b)to Earnings
Three Months Ended Nine Months Ended
December 31,
2011   January 1,
2011 December 31,
2011   January 1,
2011
Derivative Instrument^(a)

(millions)
Designated Cash Flow Hedges:


FC — Inventory purchases
$ (3.2 ) $ 5.7    $ (2.3 ) $ 11.8    Cost of goods sold
FC — I/C royalty payments
(0.4 ) (0.9 ) (3.9 ) (2.1 ) Foreign currency gains (losses)
FC — Interest payments
(0.3 ) (1.0 ) (0.7 ) (0.7 ) Foreign currency gains (losses)
FC — Other
(0.3 ) (0.1 ) 0.6    —    Foreign currency gains (losses)

Total Designated Hedges
$ (4.2 ) $ 3.7    $ (6.3 ) $ 9.0

000000000000 000000000000 000000000000 000000000000 000000000000
Gains (Losses) Recognized in Earnings
Location of Gains (Losses)
                Recognized in Earnings
Three Months Ended Nine Months Ended
December 31,
2011   January 1,
2011 December 31,
2011   January 1,
2011
Derivative Instrument^(a)

(millions)
Undesignated Hedges:

FC — Other
$ (0.7 ) $ (0.9 ) $ 1.9    $ 0.4    Foreign currency gains (losses)

Total Undesignated Hedges
$ (0.7 ) $ (0.9 ) $ 1.9    $ 0.4


	Gains (Losses) Recognized in OCI^(b)						Gains (Losses) Reclassified from AOCI^(b)to Earnings
	Three Months Ended						Three Months Ended						Location of Gains (Losses) Reclassified from AOCI^(b)to Earnings
Derivative Instrument^(a)	June 30, 2012			July 2, 2011			June 30, 2012			July 2, 2011
				(millions)
Designated Cash Flow Hedges:
FC — Inventory purchases	$	5.7		$	(8.7	)	$	3.0		$	3.2		Cost of goods sold
FC — I/C royalty payments		(4.6	)		0.9			2.3			(2.5	)	Foreign currency gains (losses)
FC — Interest payments		(0.3	)		(0.4	)		(0.3	)		0.6		Foreign currency gains (losses)
FC — Other		0.4			(0.4	)		(0.3	)		0.3		Foreign currency gains (losses)

	$	1.2		$	(8.6	)	$	4.7		$	1.6

Designated Hedges of Net Investment:
Euro Debt	$	14.2		$	(8.3	)	$	—		$	—		^(c)
Other		(0.1	)		—			—			—		^(c)

	$	14.1		$	(8.3	)	$	—		$	—

Total Designated Hedges	$	15.3		$	(16.9	)	$	4.7		$	1.6


							Gains (Losses) Recognized in Earnings
							Three Months Ended
Derivative Instrument^(a)							June 30, 2012			July 2, 2011			Location of Gains (Losses) Recognized in Earnings
							(millions)
Undesignated Hedges:
FC — Other							$	(2.2	)	$	(0.1	)	Foreign currency gains (losses)

Total Undesignated Hedges							$	(2.2	)	$	(0.1	)

^(a)	FC = Forward exchange contracts for the sale or purchase of foreign currencies; Euro Debt = Euro-denominated 4.5% notes due October 4, 2013.

^(b)	AOCI, including the respective fiscal period’s OCI, is classified as a component of total equity.

~~RALPH LAUREN CORPORATION~~

~~NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)~~

^(c)
To the extent applicable, to be recognized as a gain (loss) on the sale or liquidation of the hedged net investment.

Over the next twelve months, it is expected that approximately ~~$26~~$33 million of net gains deferred in AOCI related to derivative financial instruments ~~outstanding~~ as of ~~December 31, 2011~~June 30, 2012 will be recognized in earnings. No material gains or losses relating to ineffective hedges were recognized during any of the fiscal periods presented.

The following is a summary of the Company’s risk management strategies and the effect of those strategies on the consolidated financial statements.

Foreign Currency Risk Management

Forward Foreign Currency Exchange Contracts

RALPH LAUREN CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

operations, interest payments made in connection with outstanding debt and other foreign currency-denominated operational cash flows. As part of its overall strategy to manage the level of exposure to the risk of foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations, primarily to changes in the value of the Euro, the Japanese Yen, the Hong Kong Dollar, the South Korean Won, the Swiss Franc and the British Pound Sterling, the Company hedges a portion of its foreign currency exposures anticipated over the ensuing twelve-month to two-year periods. In doing so, the Company uses foreign currency exchange forward contracts that generally have maturities of three months to two years to provide continuing coverage throughout the hedging period.

Hedge of a Net Investment in Certain European Subsidiaries

The Company ~~designated~~designates the entire principal amount of its outstanding Euro Debt as a hedge of its net investment in certain of its European subsidiaries. To the extent this hedge remains effective, changes in the carrying value of the Euro Debt resulting from fluctuations in the Euro exchange rate will continue to be reported in equity as a component of AOCI.

Interest Rate Risk Management

Interest Rate Swap Contracts

During the first quarter of Fiscal 2011, the Company entered into a fixed-to-floating interest rate swap with an aggregate notional value of €209.2 million, which was designated as a fair value hedge to mitigate its exposure to changes in the fair value of its Euro Debt due to changes in the benchmark interest rate. The interest rate swap was executed to swap the 4.5% fixed interest rate on the Company’s Euro Debt for a variable interest rate. On April 11, 2011, the interest rate swap agreement was terminated by the Company at a loss of $7.6 million. This loss ~~has been~~was recorded as an adjustment to the carrying value of the Company’s Euro Debt and ~~will be~~is being recognized within interest expense over the remaining term of the debt, through October 4, 2013. During each of the three-month ~~and nine-month~~ periods ended ~~December 31,~~June 30, 2012 and July 2, 2011, $0.8 million ~~and $2.3 million~~ of this loss ~~respectively,~~ was recognized as interest expense within the Company’s ~~unaudited~~ consolidated statements of operations.

See Note 3 for further discussion of the Company’s accounting policies relating to its derivative financial instruments.

RALPH LAUREN CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

Investments

The following table summarizes the Company’s short-term and non-current investments recorded in the consolidated balance sheets as of ~~December~~June 30, 2012 and March 31, ~~2011 and April 2, 2011:~~2012:


	June 30, 2012						March 31, 2012
Type of Investment	Short-term < 1 year		Non-current 1 - 3 years		Total		Short-term < 1 year		Non-current 1 - 3 years		Total
					(millions)
Held-to-Maturity:
Government bonds — U.S.	$	2.7	$	—	$	2.7	$	3.2	$	—	$	3.2

Total held-to-maturity investments	$	2.7	$	—	$	2.7	$	3.2	$	—	$	3.2

Available-for-Sale:
Government bonds — U.S.	$	58.2	$	8.7	$	66.9	$	52.1	$	7.3	$	59.4
Government bonds — non-U.S.		53.6		57.9		111.5		40.4		55.6		96.0
Corporate bonds — non-U.S.		61.2		12.8		74.0		64.8		34.2		99.0
Variable rate municipal securities — U.S.		84.0		—		84.0		69.2		—		69.2
Auction rate securities		—		2.3		2.3		—		2.3		2.3
Other securities		—		0.4		0.4		—		0.5		0.5

Total available-for-sale investments	$	257.0	$	82.1	$	339.1	$	226.5	$	99.9	$	326.4

Other:
Time deposits	$	303.3	$	—	$	303.3	$	286.0	$	—	$	286.0

Total Investments	$	563.0	$	82.1	$	645.1	$	515.7	$	99.9	$	615.6

Held-to-maturity investments consist of debt securities that the Company has the intent and ability to retain until maturity. These securities are recorded at cost, adjusted for the amortization of premiums and discounts, which approximates fair value.

$000,000, $000,000, $000,000, $000,000, $000,000, $000,000,
December 31, 2011 April 2, 2011
Type of Investment
Short-term
< 1 year Non-current
1 - 3 years Total Short-term
< 1 year Non-current
1 - 3 years Total
(millions)
Held-to-Maturity:

Government bonds — U.S.
$ 5.0    $ 0.6    $ 5.6    $ 90.8    $ 12.7    $ 103.5

Total held-to-maturity investments
$ 5.0    $ 0.6    $ 5.6    $ 90.8    $ 12.7    $ 103.5

Available-for-Sale:

Government bonds — U.S.
$ 8.6    $ 2.4    $ 11.0    $ 32.3    $ 68.1    $ 100.4
Government bonds — non-U.S.
41.5    43.7    85.2    —    —    —
Corporate bonds — non-U.S.
62.2    23.1    85.3    —    —    —
Variable rate municipal securities — U.S.
42.9    —    42.9    14.5    —    14.5
Auction rate securities
—    2.3    2.3    —    2.3    2.3
Other securities
—    0.4    0.4    —    0.5    0.5

Total available-for-sale investments
$ 155.2    $ 71.9    $ 227.1    $ 46.8    $ 70.9    $ 117.7

Other:

Time deposits and other
$ 226.1    $ —    $ 226.1    $ 456.3    $ —    $ 456.3

Total Investments
$ 386.3    $ 72.5    $ 458.8    $ 593.9    $ 83.6    $ 677.5

Available-for-sale investments primarily consist of government and corporate bonds, VRMS and auction rate securities. The Company’s government and corporate bonds are diversified across a wide range of high-credit quality U.S. and non-U.S. issuers. The Company does not hold any investments in sovereign debt securities issued by Greece, Ireland, Portugal, Spain or Italy. VRMS investments represent long-term municipal bonds with interest rates that reset at pre-determined short-term intervals, and can typically be put to the issuer and redeemed for cash upon demand, or shortly thereafter. Auction rate securities also have characteristics similar to short-term investments. However, the Company has classified these securities as non-current investments in its consolidated balance sheets as current market conditions call into question its ability to redeem these investments for cash within the next twelve months.

No significant realized or unrealized gains or losses on available-for-sale investments or other-than-temporary impairment charges were recorded in any of the fiscal periods presented.

See Note 3 to the Company’s Fiscal ~~2011~~2012 10-K for further discussion of the Company’s accounting policies relating to its investments.

~~13.~~RALPH LAUREN CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

12. Commitments and Contingencies

Wathne Imports Litigation

On August 19, 2005, Wathne Imports, Ltd. (“Wathne”), the Company’s then domestic licensee for luggage and handbags, filed a complaint in the U.S. District Court in the Southern District of New York against the Company and Mr. Ralph Lauren, its Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, asserting, among other things, federal trademark law violations, breach of contract, breach of obligations of good faith and fair dealing, fraud and negligent misrepresentation. The complaint sought, among other relief, injunctive relief, compensatory damages in excess of $250 million and punitive damages of not less than $750 million. On September 13, 2005, Wathne withdrew this complaint from the U.S. District Court and filed a complaint in the Supreme Court of the State of New York, New York County, making substantially the same allegations and claims (excluding the federal trademark claims), and seeking similar relief. On February 1, 2006, the Court granted the Company’s motion to dismiss all of the causes of action, including the cause of action against Mr. Lauren, except for breach of contract related claims, and denied Wathne’s motion for a preliminary injunction. Following some discovery, the Company moved for summary judgment on the remaining claims. Wathne cross-moved for partial summary

~~RALPH LAUREN CORPORATION~~

~~NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)~~

judgment. In an April 11, 2008 Decision and Order, the Court granted Ralph Lauren’s summary judgment motion to dismiss most of the claims against the Company, and denied Wathne’s cross-motion for summary judgment. Wathne appealed the dismissal of its claims to the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court. Following a hearing on May 19, 2009, the Appellate Division issued a Decision and Order on June 9, 2009 which, in large part, affirmed the lower Court’s ruling. On January 23, 2012, the Court granted the Company’s motion to exclude Wathne’s proposed damages report thereby limiting Wathne’s presently asserted damages theory and the amount of damages that may be asserted to a jury. The Court has permitted Wathne to revise its alleged damages analysis. ~~Accordingly, while~~Wathne has appealed the order of inclusion. While a trial ~~has~~had been scheduled for April 2012, at this time it is uncertain ~~whether~~when the matter will be reached for ~~trial at such time.~~trial. The Company intends to continue to contest the remaining claims in this lawsuit vigorously. Management does not expect that the ultimate resolution of this matter will have a material adverse effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

Other Matters

The Company is otherwise involved, from time to time, in litigation, other legal claims and proceedings involving matters associated with or incidental to its business, including, among other things, matters involving credit card fraud, trademark and other intellectual property, licensing, and employee relations. The Company believes that the resolution of currently pending matters will not individually or in the aggregate have a material adverse effect on its financial statements. However, the Company’s assessment of the current litigation or other legal claims could change in light of the discovery of facts not presently known or determinations by judges, juries or other finders of fact which are not in accord with management’s evaluation of the possible liability or outcome of such litigation or claims.

~~14.~~RALPH LAUREN CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

13. Equity

Summary of Changes in Equity

Nine Months Ended
December 31,
2011 January 1,
2011
(millions)
Balance at beginning of period
$ 3,304.7    $ 3,116.6
Comprehensive income:

Net income attributable to RLC
586.6    494.4
Foreign currency translation adjustments
(60.2 ) 29.0
Net realized and unrealized gains (losses) on derivatives
52.0    (0.9 )
Net unrealized gains (losses) on available-for-sale investments
(0.1 ) (0.1 )
Net unrealized gains (losses) on defined benefit plans
(0.8 ) —

Total comprehensive income
577.5    522.4

Cash dividends declared
(55.4 ) (28.7 )
Repurchases of common stock
(419.4 ) (347.7 )
Shares issued and equity grants made pursuant to stock-based compensation plans
122.3    150.4

Balance at end of period
$ 3,529.7    $ 3,413.0


	Three Months Ended
	June 30, 2012			July 2, 2011
	(millions)
Balance at beginning of period	$	3,652.5		$	3,304.7
Comprehensive income		158.2			208.3
Cash dividends declared		(36.5	)		(18.5	)
Repurchases of common stock		(346.5	)		(324.5	)
Shares issued and equity grants made pursuant to stock-based compensation plans		44.1			31.7

Balance at end of period	$	3,471.8		$	3,201.7

Common Stock Repurchase Program

On May 24, 2011, the Company’s Board of Directors approved an expansion of the Company’s existing common stock repurchase program that allows it to repurchase up to an additional $500 million of Class A common stock. Repurchases of shares of Class A common stock are subject to overall business and market conditions.

~~RALPH LAUREN CORPORATION~~

~~NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)~~

During the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~December 31, 2011, 3.2~~June 30, 2012, 2.0 million shares of Class A common stock were repurchased by the Company at a cost of ~~$395.1~~$300.0 million under its repurchase program. The remaining availability under the Company’s common stock repurchase program was approximately ~~$577~~$277 million as of ~~December 31, 2011.~~June 30, 2012. In addition, ~~0.2~~0.4 million shares of Class A common stock at a cost of ~~$24.3~~$46.5 million were surrendered to, or withheld by, the Company in satisfaction of withholding taxes in connection with the vesting of awards under the Company’s 1997 Long-Term Stock Incentive Plan, as amended (the “1997 Incentive Plan”) and its 2010 Long-Term Stock Incentive Plan (the “2010 Incentive Plan”).

During the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~January 1,~~July 2, 2011, ~~4.0~~2.5 million shares of Class A common stock were repurchased by the Company at a cost of ~~$331.0~~$301.7 million under its repurchase program, including a repurchase of 1.0 million shares of Class A common stock from its principal stockholder, Mr. Ralph Lauren, at a cost of $81.0 million in connection with the Company’s secondary public offerings of 10 million shares of Class A common stock on behalf of Mr. Lauren on June 14, 2010.program. In addition, ~~0.2~~0.1 million shares of Class A common stock at a cost of ~~$16.7~~$22.8 million were surrendered to, or withheld by, the Company in satisfaction of withholding taxes in connection with the vesting of awards under the 1997 Incentive Plan and the 2010 Incentive Plan.

Repurchased and surrendered shares are accounted for as treasury stock at cost and ~~will be~~ held in treasury for future use.

On August 9, 2012, the Company’s Board of Directors approved a further expansion of the Company’s existing common stock repurchase program that will allow it to repurchase up to an additional $500 million of Class A common stock.

Dividends

Since 2003, the Company has maintained a regular quarterly cash dividend program on its common stock. On ~~February 8, 2011,~~May 21, 2012, the Company’s Board of Directors approved an increase to the Company’s quarterly cash dividend on its common stock from ~~$0.10~~$0.20 per share to ~~$0.20~~$0.40 per share. The ~~third~~first quarter Fiscal ~~2012~~2013 dividend of ~~$0.20~~$0.40 per share was declared on ~~December 19, 2011,~~May 22, 2012, was payable to stockholders of record at the close of business on ~~December 30, 2011,~~June 29, 2012, and was paid on ~~January~~July 13, 2012. Dividends paid amounted to ~~$55.8~~$18.5 million during the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~December 31, 2011~~June 30, 2012 and ~~$28.9~~$18.9 million during the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~January 1,~~July 2, 2011.

~~15.~~RALPH LAUREN CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

14. Stock-based Compensation

Long-term Stock Incentive Plans

On August 5, 2010, the Company’s stockholders approved the 2010 Incentive Plan, which replaced the Company’s 1997 Incentive Plan. The 2010 Incentive Plan provides for up to ~~3.0~~3 million of new shares authorized for issuance to participants, in addition to the shares that remained available for issuance under the 1997 Incentive Plan as of August 5, 2010 that are not subject to outstanding awards under the 1997 Incentive Plan. In addition, any outstanding awards under the 1997 Incentive Plan that expire, are forfeited, or are surrendered to the Company in satisfaction of taxes, will be transferred to the 2010 Incentive Plan and be available for issuance. Any new grants are being issued under the 2010 Incentive Plan. However, awards that were outstanding as of August 5, 2010 continue to remain subject to the terms of the 1997 Incentive Plan.

Under both the 2010 Incentive Plan and the 1997 Incentive Plan (the “Plans”), there are limits as to the number of shares available for certain awards and to any one participant. Equity awards that may be made under the Plans include, but are not limited to (a) stock options, (b) restricted stock and (c) restricted stock units (“RSUs”).

~~RALPH LAUREN CORPORATION~~

~~NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)~~

Impact on Results

A summary of the total compensation expense recorded within SG&A expenses and the associated income tax benefits recognized related to stock-based compensation arrangements is as follows:

		December 31, 0			December 31, 0			December 31, 0			December 31, 0
	Three Months Ended						Nine Months Ended						Three Months Ended
	December 31, 2011			January 1, 2011			December 31, 2011			January 1, 2011			June 30, 2012			July 2, 2011
	(millions)												(millions)
Compensation expense	$	21.2		$	18.1		$	55.2		$	48.9		$	21.6		$	17.9

Income tax benefit	$	(7.3	)	$	(6.4	)	$	(19.2	)	$	(17.7	)	$	(7.1	)	$	(6.4	)

The Company issues its annual grant of stock-based compensation awards in the second quarter of its fiscal year. Due to the timing of the annual grant, stock-based compensation cost recognized during the ~~three-month and nine-month periods~~three months ended ~~December 31, 2011~~June 30, 2012 is not indicative of the level of compensation cost expected to be incurred for the full Fiscal ~~2012.~~2013.

Stock Options

Stock options are granted to employees and non-employee directors with exercise prices equal to the fair market value of the Company’s ~~unrestricted~~ Class A common stock on the date of grant. Generally, ~~the~~ options become exercisable ratably ~~(a graded-vesting~~(graded-vesting schedule) over a three-year vesting period. Stock options generally expire seven years from the date of grant. The Company recognizes compensation expense for share-based awards that have graded vesting and no performance conditions on an accelerated basis.

The Company uses the Black-Scholes option pricing model to estimate the fair value of stock options granted, which requires the input of both subjective and objective assumptions. The Company develops its assumptions by analyzing the historical exercise behavior of employees and non-employee directors. The Company’s weighted-average assumptions used to estimate the fair value of stock options granted during the nine months ended December 31, 2011 and January 1, 2011 were as follows:

RALPH LAUREN CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

December 31, 0 December 31, 0
   Nine Months Ended
   December 31,
2011 January 1,
2011
Expected term (years)
   4.7    4.6
Expected volatility
   44.7 % 44.3 %
Expected dividend yield
   0.73 % 0.51 %
Risk-free interest rate
   1.3 % 1.6 %
Weighted-average option grant date fair value
   $ 49.06    $ 28.16

A summary of the stock option activity under all plans during the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~December 31, 2011~~June 30, 2012 is as follows:

		~~December 31, 0~~
	Number of Shares
	(thousands)
Options outstanding at ~~April 2, 2011~~March 31, 2012		~~3,804~~3,178
Granted		~~554~~19
Exercised		(~~711~~72	)
Cancelled/Forfeited		(8611	)

Options outstanding at ~~December 31, 2011~~June 30, 2012		~~3,561~~3,114

~~RALPH LAUREN CORPORATION~~

~~NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)~~

Restricted Stock and RSUs

The Company grants restricted shares of Class A common stock and service-based RSUs to certain of its senior executives and non-employee directors. In addition, the Company grants performance-based RSUs to such senior executives and other key executives, as well as certain other employees of the Company. The fair values of restricted stock shares and RSUs are based on the fair value of ~~unrestricted~~ Class A common stock on the date of grant, as adjusted to reflect the absence of dividends for those restricted securities that are not entitled to dividend equivalents. The Company’s weighted-average grant date fair values of performance-based RSUs granted during the nine months ended December 31, 2011 and January 1, 2011 were $124.43 and $74.95, respectively. The Company’s weighted-average grant date fair value of service-based RSUs granted during the nine months ended December 31, 2011 was $132.94. The Company did not grant any service-based RSUs during the nine months ended January 1, 2011, and there was no restricted stock granted during the nine months ended December 31, 2011 or January 1, 2011.

Restricted stock shares granted to non-employee directors vest over a three-year period of time. Service-based RSUs generally vest over a three to five-year period of time, subject to the executive’s continuing employment. Performance-based RSUs generally vest (a) upon the completion of a three-year period of time (cliff vesting), subject to the employee’s continuing employment and the Company’s achievement of certain performance goals over the three-year period or (b) ratably, over a three-year period of time (graded vesting), subject to the employee’s continuing employment during the applicable vesting period and the achievement by the Company of certain performance goals in the initial year of the three-year vesting period.

A summary of the restricted stock and RSU activity during the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~December 31, 2011~~June 30, 2012 is as follows:

		Restricted Stock		Restricted Stock			Restricted Stock
	Restricted Stock		Service- based RSUs			Performance- based RSUs			Restricted Stock			Service- based RSUs			Performance- based RSUs
	Number of Shares		Number of Shares			Number of Shares			Number of Shares			Number of Shares			Number of Shares
			(thousands)									(thousands)
Nonvested at April 2, 2011		8		342			1,416
Nonvested at March 31, 2012										8			235			1,302
Granted		—		34			429			2			—			176
Vested		—		(120	)		(468	)		(5	)		(1	)		(754	)
Cancelled		—		—			(53	)		—			—			(8	)

Nonvested at December 31, 2011		8		256			1,324
Nonvested at June 30, 2012										5			234			716

~~16.~~15. Segment Information

The Company has three reportable segments based on its business activities and organization: Wholesale, Retail and Licensing. Such segments offer a variety of products through different channels of distribution. The Wholesale segment consists of women’s, men’s and children’s apparel, accessories, home furnishings, and

RALPH LAUREN CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

related products which are sold to major department stores, specialty stores, golf and pro shops and the Company’s owned, licensed and ~~licensed~~franchised retail stores in the U.S. and overseas. The Retail segment consists of the Company’s worldwide retail operations, which sell products through its ~~full-price and factory~~retail stores, its concessions-based shop-within-shops, and its e-commerce websites. The stores, concessions-based shop-within-shops and websites sell products purchased from the Company’s licensees, suppliers and Wholesale segment. The Licensing segment generates revenues from royalties earned on the sale of the Company’s apparel, home and other products internationally and domestically through licensing alliances. The licensing agreements grant the

~~RALPH LAUREN CORPORATION~~

~~NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)~~

licensees rights to use the Company’s various trademarks in connection with the manufacture and sale of designated products in specified geographical areas for specified periods.

The accounting policies of the Company’s segments are consistent with those described in Notes 2 and 3 to the Company’s consolidated financial statements included in the Fiscal ~~2011~~2012 10-K. Sales and transfers between segments generally are recorded at cost and treated as transfers of inventory. All intercompany revenues, including such sales between segments, are eliminated in consolidation and are not reviewed when evaluating segment performance. Each segment’s performance is evaluated based upon operating income before restructuring charges and certain other one-time items, such as legal charges, if any. Corporate overhead expenses (exclusive of certain expenses for senior management, overall branding-related expenses and certain other corporate-related expenses) are allocated to the segments based upon specific usage or other allocation methods.

Net revenues and operating income for each of the Company’s segments are as follows:


	Three Months Ended
	June 30, 2012		July 2, 2011
	(millions)
Net revenues:
Wholesale	$	694.1	$	673.0
Retail		857.3		813.5
Licensing		42.0		39.9

Total net revenues	$	1,593.4	$	1,526.4

December 31, 0 December 31, 0 December 31, 0 December 31, 0
   Three Months Ended    Nine Months Ended
   December 31,
2011    January 1,
2011    December 31,
2011    January 1,
2011
      (millions)
Net revenues:

Wholesale
   $ 750.0       $ 676.3       $ 2,418.5       $ 2,026.1
Retail
   1,006.0       821.6       2,680.8       2,072.9
Licensing
   49.6       50.1       137.3       134.4








Total net revenues
   $ 1,805.6       $ 1,548.0       $ 5,236.6       $ 4,233.4

December 31, 0 December 31, 0 December 31, 0 December 31, 0
   Three Months Ended Nine Months Ended
   December 31,
2011 January 1,
2011 December 31,
2011 January 1,
2011
   (millions)
Operating income:

Wholesale
   $ 115.5    $ 130.3    $ 513.1    $ 475.9
Retail
   194.4    152.9    513.5    362.0
Licensing
   31.9    29.7    86.8    80.8


   341.8    312.9    1,113.4    918.7
Unallocated corporate expenses
   (71.7 ) (66.6 ) (210.4 ) (190.8 )


Total operating income
   $    270.1    $    246.3    $    903.0    $    727.9

~~Depreciation and amortization expense for each segment is as follows:~~

		December 31, 0		December 31, 0		December 31, 0		December 31, 0
	Three Months Ended				Nine Months Ended				Three Months Ended
	December 31, 2011		January 1, 2011		December 31, 2011		January 1, 2011		June 30, 2012			July 2, 2011
	(millions)								(millions)
Depreciation and amortization:
Operating income:
Wholesale	$	16.7	$	12.5	$	48.5	$	42.7	$	155.5		$	151.1
Retail		29.6		28.0		86.1		66.6		180.2			173.1
Licensing		0.2		0.4		0.8		1.0		26.6			25.2

										362.3			349.4
Unallocated corporate expenses		10.3		9.5		32.8		32.5		(70.3	)		(67.3	)

Total depreciation and amortization	$	56.8	$	50.4	$	168.2	$	142.8
Total operating income									$	292.0		$	282.1

RALPH LAUREN CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

Depreciation and amortization expense for each of the Company’s segments is as follows:


	Three Months Ended
	June 30, 2012		July 2, 2011
	(millions)
Depreciation and amortization:
Wholesale	$	17.1	$	15.5
Retail		27.1		28.3
Licensing		0.3		0.4
Unallocated corporate expenses		11.6		11.2

Total depreciation and amortization	$	56.1	$	55.4

Net revenues by geographic location of the reporting subsidiary are as follows:


	Three Months Ended
	June 30, 2012		July 2, 2011
	(millions)
Net revenues:
The Americas^(a)	$	1,075.2	$	972.9
Europe^(a)		299.8		321.8
Asia^(b)		218.4		231.7

Total net revenues	$	1,593.4	$	1,526.4

^(a)

Net revenues for certain of the Company’s licensed operations are included within the geographic location of the reporting subsidiary which holds the respective license.

^(b)

Includes South Korea, Japan, China, Hong Kong, Indonesia, Malaysia, the Philippines, Singapore, Taiwan, Thailand and Australia.

~~17.~~16. Additional Financial Information

Cash Interest and Taxes

   Three Months Ended Nine Months Ended
   December 31,
2011    January 1,
2011 December 31,
2011    January 1,
2011
   (millions)
Cash paid for interest
   $ 14.4       $ 15.3 ^(a) $ 21.5       $ 18.1 ^(a)






Cash paid for income taxes
   $ 69.8       $ 56.5    $ 95.1       $ 180.4

^(a)	~~Net of $0.4 million cash received related to the interest rate swap on the Company’s Euro Debt, which was terminated in April 2011 (see Note 12).~~


	Three Months Ended
	June 30, 2012		July 2, 2011
	(millions)
Cash paid for interest	$	1.8	$	4.9

Cash paid for income taxes	$	78.1	$	11.4

Non-cash Transactions

Significant non-cash investing activities included the capitalization of fixed assets and recognition of related obligations in the net amount of ~~$48.7~~$30.2 million for the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~December 31, 2011~~June 30, 2012 and ~~$19.2~~$7.6 million for the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~January 1,~~July 2, 2011. Significant non-cash investing activities also included the non-cash allocation of fair value of the net assets acquired in connection with the South Korea Licensed Operations Acquisition on January 1, 2011. See Note 5 for further discussion of this acquisition.

Significant non-cash financing activities during the nine months ended January 1, 2011 included the conversion of 11.3 million shares of Class B common stock into an equal number of shares of Class A common stock by Mr. Ralph Lauren, pursuant to the terms of the security.

There were no other significant non-cash investing or financing activities for the fiscal periods presented.

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of ~~Operations~~Operations.

Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements

Various statements in this Form 10-Q or incorporated by reference into this Form 10-Q, in future filings by us with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”), in our press releases and in oral statements made from time to time by us or on our behalf constitute “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward-looking statements are based on current expectations and are indicated by words or phrases such as “anticipate,” “estimate,” “expect,” “project,” “we believe,” “is or remains optimistic,” “currently envisions” and similar words or phrases and involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors which may cause actual results, performance or achievements to be materially different from the future results, performance or achievements expressed in or implied by such forward-looking statements. ~~Although we believe that our expectations are based on reasonable assumptions within the bounds of our knowledge of our business and operations, certain~~These risks, uncertainties, and other factors ~~may cause results to differ materially from expectations and may also affect our forward-looking statements, including,~~include, among ~~other items:~~others:

the loss of key personnel, including Mr. Ralph Lauren;

the impact of global economic conditions, including the ongoing sovereign debt crisis and ~~the recent~~credit downgrades, ~~in Europe,~~on us, our customers, our suppliers and our vendors, and on our ability ~~as well as the~~and their ability ~~of our customers, suppliers and vendors~~ to access sources of liquidity;

our ability to ~~maintain~~successfully implement our ~~credit profile~~anticipated growth strategies;

our ability to continue to expand or grow our business internationally, and ~~ratings with~~ the ~~financial community;~~impact of related changes in our geographic sales mix as a result;

our ability to secure our facilities and systems and those of our third party service providers from, among other things, cybersecurity breaches, acts of vandalism, computer viruses or similar Internet or email events;

our efforts to improve the efficiency of our distribution system and to continue to enhance our global information technology systems;

~~changes to our anticipated growth strategies;~~

~~our ability to continue to expand or grow our business internationally;~~

our exposure to domestic and foreign currency fluctuations and risks associated with raw materials, transportation and labor costs;

the impact of fluctuations in the U.S. or global economy on consumer purchases of premium lifestyle products that we offer for sale and our ability to forecast consumer demand;

our ability to open new retail stores, concession shops and e-commerce websites, and expand our direct-to-consumer presence;

our ability to make certain strategic acquisitions of certain selected licenses held by our licensees and successfully integrate ~~recently~~ acquired businesses, including our ~~recently acquired Asian~~ operations ~~(such as~~in Asia and South ~~Korea), and certain of our operations relating to our home products;~~America;

our intention to introduce new products or enter into or renew alliances and exclusive relationships;

our ability to continue to pay dividends and repurchase Class A common stock;

changes in the competitive marketplace, including the introduction of new products or pricing changes by our competitors and consolidations, liquidations, restructurings and other ownership changes in the retail industry;

changes to our anticipated effective tax rates in future years;

our ability to continue to ~~pay dividends and repurchase Class A common stock;~~

~~our ability to continue to~~ maintain our brand image and reputation and protect our trademarks;

changes in our relationships with department store customers and licensing partners;

our ability to maintain our credit profile and ratings with the impact of the downgrade by Standard & Poor’s (“S&P”) on the credit ratings of the United States and other countries and the risk of further downgrades by S&P or other credit agencies on the credit ratings of such countries;financial community;

the potential impact on our operations and customers resulting from natural or man-made ~~disasters, such as the recent earthquake, tsunami and infrastructure disasters in Japan;~~disasters;

the impact to our business of events that are currently taking place in the Middle East, as well as from any terrorist action, retaliation and the threat of further action or retaliation; and

a variety of legal, regulatory, political and economic risks, including risks related to the importation and exportation of products, tariffs and other trade barriers, to which our international operations are subject and other risks associated with our international operations, such as violations of laws prohibiting improper payments, and the burdens of complying with a variety of foreign laws and regulations, including trade and labor restrictions and related laws that may reduce the flexibility of our business.

These forward-looking statements are based largely on our expectations and judgments and are subject to a number of risks and uncertainties, many of which are unforeseeable and beyond our control. A detailed discussion of significant risk factors that have the potential to cause our actual results to differ materially from our expectations is included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended ~~April 2, 2011~~March 31, 2012 (the “Fiscal ~~2011~~2012 10-K”). There are no material changes to such risk factors, nor are there any identifiable previously undisclosed risks as set forth in Part II, Item 1A —“Risk Factors”of this Form 10-Q. We undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

On August 11, 2011, at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders of the Company, our stockholders approved an amendment to the Company’s Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation to change the Company’s name from Polo Ralph Lauren Corporation to Ralph Lauren Corporation. The Company’s name change became effective on August 15, 2011. In this Form 10-Q, references to “Ralph Lauren,” “ourselves,” “we,” “our,” “us” and the “Company” refer to Ralph Lauren Corporation and its subsidiaries (“RLC”), unless the context indicates otherwise. ~~Due to the collaborative and ongoing nature of our relationships with our licensees, such licensees are sometimes referred to in this Form 10-Q as “licensing alliances.”~~ We utilize a 52-53 week fiscal year ending on the Saturday closest to March 31. As such, fiscal year ~~2012~~2013 will end on March ~~31, 2012~~30, 2013 and will be a 52-week period (“Fiscal ~~2012”~~2013”). Fiscal year ~~2011~~2012 ended on ~~April 2, 2011~~March 31, 2012 and also reflected a 52-week period (“Fiscal ~~2011”~~2012”). The ~~third~~first quarter ~~for~~of Fiscal ~~2012~~2013 ended on ~~December 31, 2011~~June 30, 2012 and was a 13-week period. The ~~third~~first quarter of Fiscal ~~2011~~2012 ended on ~~January 1,~~July 2, 2011 and was also a 13-week period.

INTRODUCTION

Management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations (“MD&A”) is provided as a supplement to the accompanying unaudited interim consolidated financial statements and footnotes to help provide an understanding of our financial condition and liquidity, changes in our financial position, and results of our operations. MD&A is organized as follows:

•

Overview. This section provides a general description of our business, global economic developments, and a summary of our financial performance for the three-month ~~and nine-month periods~~period ended ~~December 31, 2011 and January 1, 2011.~~June 30, 2012. In addition, this section includes a discussion of recent developments and transactions affecting comparability that we believe are important in understanding our results of operations and financial condition, and in anticipating future trends.

•

Results of operations. This section provides an analysis of our results of operations for the three-month ~~and nine-month~~ periods ended ~~December 31, 2011~~June 30, 2012 and ~~January 1,~~July 2, 2011.

•
Financial condition and liquidity. This section provides an analysis of our cash flows for the ~~nine-month~~three-month periods ended ~~December 31, 2011~~June 30, 2012 and ~~January 1,~~July 2, 2011, as well as a discussion of our financial condition and liquidity as of ~~December 31, 2011~~June 30, 2012 as compared to the end of Fiscal ~~2011.~~2012. The discussion of our financial condition and liquidity includes (i) a discussion of our financial position compared to the end of Fiscal ~~2011,~~2012, (ii) the available financial capacity under our credit facilities, (iii) a summary of our key debt compliance measures, and (iv) any material changes in our financial condition and contractual obligations since the end of Fiscal ~~2011.~~2012.

•

Market risk management. This section discusses any significant changes in our interest rate, foreign currency and investment risk exposures, the types of derivative instruments used to hedge those exposures, and/or underlying market conditions since the end of Fiscal ~~2011.~~2012.

•

Critical accounting policies. This section discusses any significant changes in our accounting policies since the end of Fiscal ~~2011.~~2012. Significant changes include those considered to be important to our

financial condition and results of operations and which require significant judgment and estimation on the part of management in their application. In addition, all of our significant accounting policies, including our critical accounting policies, are summarized in Note 3 to our audited consolidated financial statements as included in our Fiscal ~~2011~~2012 10-K.

•

Recently issued accounting standards. This section discusses the potential impact to our ~~reported~~consolidated financial statements of certain accounting standards that have been recently issued or proposed.

OVERVIEW

Our Business

Our Company is a global leader in the design, marketing and distribution of premium lifestyle products, including men’s, women’s and children’s apparel, accessories (including footwear), fragrances and home furnishings. Our long-standing reputation and distinctive image have been consistently developed across an expanding number of products, brands and international markets. Our brand names includePolo Ralph Lauren, Purple Label, Ralph Lauren Women’s Collection, Black Label, Blue Label, Lauren by Ralph Lauren, RRL, RLX Ralph Lauren, Denim & Supply Ralph Lauren, Rugby, Ralph Lauren, Ralph Lauren Childrenswear, American Living, ChapsandClub Monaco, among others.

We classify our businesses into three segments: Wholesale, Retail and Licensing. Our Wholesale business, ~~(representing~~representing approximately ~~49%~~47% of Fiscal ~~2011~~2012 net ~~revenues)~~revenues, consists of wholesale-channel sales made principally to major department stores and specialty stores located throughout ~~the U.S., Canada,~~North America, Europe, Asia and South America. Our ~~retail~~Retail business, ~~(representing~~representing approximately ~~48%~~50% of Fiscal ~~2011~~2012 net ~~revenues)~~revenues, consists of retail-channel sales directly to consumers through ~~full-price and factory~~ retail stores located throughout ~~the U.S., Canada,~~North America, Europe, Asia and South America; through concessions-based shop-within-shops located primarily in Asia; and through our retail e-commerce channel, which includes our ~~domestic sites located at www.RalphLauren.com~~North American and ~~www.Rugby.com, and our~~ European ~~sites for the United Kingdom and France (including the surrounding countries of Belgium, Luxembourg and the Netherlands) located at www.RalphLauren.co.uk and www.RalphLauren.fr, respectively.~~sites. In ~~October 2011,~~April 2012, we expanded our e-commerce presence ~~in Europe~~ by launching a new retail e-commerce site for ourClub Monaco business in ~~Germany~~Canada located at ~~www.RalphLauren.de, which also ships products to Austria.~~www.ClubMonaco.ca. Our ~~licensing~~Licensing business, ~~(representing~~representing approximately 3% of Fiscal ~~2011~~2012 net ~~revenues)~~revenues, consists of royalty-based arrangements under which we license the right to third parties to use our various trademarks in connection with the manufacture and sale of designated products, such as apparel, eyewear and fragrances, in specified geographical areas for specified periods. Approximately ~~33%~~38% of our Fiscal ~~2011~~2012 net revenues were earned in international regions outside of the U.S. ~~and Canada.~~

Our business is typically affected by seasonal trends, with higher levels of wholesale sales in our second and fourth quarters and higher retail sales in our second and third quarters. These trends result primarily from the

timing of seasonal wholesale shipments and key vacation travel, back-to-school and holiday shopping periods in the Retail segment. In addition, fluctuations in sales, operating income and cash flows in any fiscal quarter may be influenced by other events affecting retail sales, such as changes in weather patterns. Accordingly, our operating results ~~for the three-month and nine-month periods ended December 31, 2011,~~ and cash flows for the ~~nine-month~~three-month period ended ~~December 31, 2011~~June 30, 2012 are not necessarily indicative of the results and cash flows that may be expected for the full Fiscal ~~2012.~~2013.

Global Economic Developments

As discussed in our Fiscal 2012 Form 10-K, the state of the global economy continues to influence the level of consumer spending for discretionary items. This affects our business as it is highly dependent on consumer demand for our products. The current political and economic global environments, most notably in the U.S., Europe and Asia, have resulted in significant macroeconomic risks including high rates of unemployment, currency volatility and continued global economic uncertainty driven in part by the European debt crisis and the slowdown in economic growth in the U.S. and Asia, among other factors. These risks, combined with

expectations of slower global economic growth and increased austerity measures, have adversely affected consumer and business sentiment resulting in a highly promotional global retail environment. Despite the challenging economic environment, we continued to experience reported revenue growth during the first quarter of Fiscal 2013. However, as a result of the current economic environment and decrease in consumer confidence worldwide, current trends show softness in certain of our European wholesale businesses. If the global macroeconomic environment, including the economic situations in the U.S., Europe and Asia, continues to be weak or worsens, the related constrained level of worldwide consumer spending and modified consumption behavior we expect will have a negative effect on our sales and operating margin for at least the remainder of the fiscal year.

In addition, we continue to experience the cost of goods inflation that began during the second half of Fiscal 2011 and peaked during Fiscal 2012 as a result of increased raw material, transportation and labor costs, as well as labor shortages in certain regions where our products are manufactured. During the first quarter of Fiscal 2013, the impact of such cost of goods inflation primarily affected our Retail operations and was mitigated to some extent by targeted pricing actions. While the peak costs of goods inflation levels have subsided and we expect to experience margin recovery during Fiscal 2013, sourcing pressures will continue to impact the cost of our products and the related gross profit percentages in the normal course of our business.

We continue to monitor these risks and evaluate our operating strategies in order to adjust to changes in economic conditions, including fluctuations in global labor rates and commodity pricing.

For a detailed discussion of significant risk factors that have the potential to cause our actual results to differ materially from our expectations, see Part I, Item 1A — “Risk Factors” in our Fiscal 2012 10-K.

Summary of Financial Performance

~~Global Economic Developments~~

The state of the global economy continues to influence the level of consumer spending for discretionary items. This affects our business as it is highly dependent on consumer demand for our products. The current political and economic global environments, most notably in the U.S. and Europe, have resulted in significant macroeconomic risks including high rates of unemployment, high fuel prices and continued global economic uncertainty driven in part by the European debt crisis, among other factors. These risks, combined with expectations of slower global economic growth and increased austerity measures, have adversely affected consumer and business sentiment. Despite the challenging economic environment, we continued to experience reported revenue growth during the first nine months of Fiscal 2012. However, if the global macroeconomic environment continues to be weak or worsens, the related constrained level of worldwide consumer spending and modified consumption behavior will likely have a negative effect on the Company’s sales and operating margin growth rates for the remainder of the current fiscal year and into fiscal year 2013.

In addition, we continue to experience the cost of goods inflation that began during the second half of Fiscal 2011 as a result of rising raw material, transportation and labor costs, as well as labor shortages in certain regions where our products are manufactured. The impact of such cost of goods inflation has been most pronounced on our Wholesale operations and was mitigated to some extent on a consolidated basis by targeted pricing actions and a more favorable channel mix during the current year-to-date period. However, these sourcing pressures are expected to continue to have a negative effect on the cost of most of our products and the related gross profit percentages at least for the remainder of Fiscal 2012.

~~We continue to monitor these risks and evaluate our operating strategies in order to adjust to changes in economic conditions, including increases in global labor rates and commodity pricing.~~

Operating Results

~~Three Months Ended December 31, 2011 Compared to Three Months Ended January 1, 2011~~

During the ~~third~~first quarter of Fiscal ~~2012,~~2013, we reported revenues of ~~$1.806~~$1.593 billion, net income attributable to RLC of ~~$169.0~~$193.4 million and net income per diluted share attributable to RLC of ~~$1.78.~~$2.03. This compares to revenues of ~~$1.548~~$1.526 billion, net income attributable to RLC of ~~$168.4~~$184.1 million and net income per diluted share attributable to RLC of ~~$1.72~~$1.90 during the ~~third~~first quarter of Fiscal ~~2011.~~2012.

Our operating performance for the three months ended ~~December 31, 2011~~June 30, 2012 was driven by ~~16.6%~~4.4% revenue growth, primarily due to increased ~~comparable global retail store sales and the inclusion of~~ revenues from our ~~South Korea business acquired on January 1, 2011 (see~~~~“Recent Developments”~~~~for further discussion), as well as higher~~domestic wholesale and retail businesses, partially offset by lower revenues from our ~~U.S. and~~ European wholesale ~~businesses.~~business and net unfavorable foreign currency effects. Our gross margin percentage declined by ~~150~~70 basis points to ~~57.1%~~62.3% during the ~~third~~first quarter of Fiscal ~~2012, primarily due to substantial~~2013, reflecting sourcing cost ~~increases experienced~~pressures across most of our global retail businesses, ~~particularly in our Wholesale segment,~~ as well as ~~the effect of an unfavorable channel mix within~~lower gross margins from our European wholesale ~~business.~~businesses driven by a less favorable customer mix. The ~~decrease~~decline was offset in part by higher gross ~~margin percentage was partially mitigated by consolidated targeted pricing actions,~~margins from our domestic wholesale businesses, as well as ~~a more favorable geographic and channel mix driven by~~from our retail ~~businesses~~operations in ~~Europe and~~ Asia ~~(including~~reflecting improved inventory management as we reposition our recently acquired ~~business in~~

~~South Korea).~~businesses. Selling, general and administrative (“SG&A”) expenses increased largely due to higher compensation-related costs and additional expenses to support our growth in sales, as well as our new business ~~initiatives and recent acquisitions.~~initiatives.

Net income attributable to RLC increased ~~slightly~~ during the ~~third~~first quarter of Fiscal 2013 as compared to the first quarter of Fiscal 2012, ~~as compared to the third quarter of Fiscal 2011,~~ primarily due to a ~~$23.8~~$9.9 million increase in operating income ~~which was largely offset by~~and a ~~$23.1 million increase~~decrease in ~~the provision for income taxes. The increase in the provision for income taxes reflected a 610 basis point increase in~~ our reported effective tax rate ~~primarily driven by the absence~~ of ~~prior period tax reserve reductions, as well as higher pretax income.~~100 basis points. Net income per diluted share attributable to RLC also increased, primarily ~~due to lower weighted-average diluted shares outstanding during the third quarter of Fiscal 2012.~~

~~Nine Months Ended December 31, 2011 Compared to Nine Months Ended January 1, 2011~~

During the nine months ended December 31, 2011, we reported revenues of $5.237 billion, net income attributable to RLC of $586.6 million and net income per diluted share attributable to RLC of $6.14. This compares to revenues of $4.233 billion, net income attributable to RLC of $494.4 million and net income per diluted share attributable to RLC of $5.01 during the nine months ended January 1, 2011.

Our operating performance for the nine months ended December 31, 2011 was driven by 23.7% revenue growth, primarily due to increased comparable global retail store sales and the inclusion of revenues from our South Korea business acquired on January 1, 2011, as well as higher revenues from our global wholesale businesses and the net favorable foreign currency effects. Our gross margin percentage declined by 50 basis points to 58.7% during the nine months ended December 31, 2011, primarily due to sourcing cost increases experienced across our global businesses, particularly in our Wholesale segment, partially mitigated by consolidated targeted pricing actions. The decrease in gross margin percentage was also partially offset by a more favorable geographic and channel mix and stronger levels of full-price sell-throughs driven by our retail businesses in Asia. SG&A expenses increased largely due to higher compensation-related costs and additional expenses to support our growth in sales, as well as our new business initiatives and recent acquisitions.

Net income attributable to RLC increased during the nine months ended December 31, 2011 as compared to the nine months ended January 1, 2011, primarily due to a $175.1 million increase in operating income, partially offset by a $78.0 million increase in the provision for income taxes. The increase in the provision for income taxes was driven by the overall increase in pretax income, along with a 300 basis point increase in our effective tax rate. Net income per diluted share attributable to RLC also increased due to the effect of higher net income coupled with lower weighted-average diluted shares outstanding during the ~~nine months ended December 31, 2011.~~first quarter of Fiscal 2013.

Financial Condition and Liquidity

Our financial position reflects the overall relative strength of our business results. We ended the ~~third~~first quarter of Fiscal ~~2012~~2013 in a net cash and investments position (cash and cash equivalents plus short-term and non-current

investments, less total debt) of ~~$1.009 billion,~~$852.6 million, compared to ~~$838.6 million~~$1.013 billion as of ~~the end of Fiscal 2011.~~March 31, 2012. The ~~increase~~decrease in our net cash and investments position was primarily due to our ~~operating cash flows, partially offset by our~~ treasury stock repurchases, capital expenditures and dividend payments, partially offset by our operating cash flows during the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~December 31, 2011.~~June 30, 2012. Our equity ~~increased~~decreased to ~~$3.530~~$3.472 billion as of ~~December 31, 2011~~June 30, 2012 compared to ~~$3.305~~$3.653 billion as of ~~April 2, 2011,~~March 31, 2012 primarily due to our ~~net income and equity issuances made pursuant to stock-based compensation arrangements,~~share repurchase activity, partially offset by our ~~share repurchase activity~~net income during the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~December 31, 2011.~~June 30, 2012.

We generated ~~$784.2~~$268.7 million of cash from operations during the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~December 31, 2011,~~June 30, 2012, compared to ~~$594.3~~$212.4 million during the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~January 1,~~July 2, 2011. The increase in operating cash flows

primarily relates to ~~the increase~~changes in ~~net income before non-cash expenses~~working capital, including cash flow increases related to accounts receivable and ~~lower~~inventories, partially offset by higher income tax payments during the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~December 31, 2011, partially offset by changes in working capital.~~June 30, 2012. We used some of our available cash ~~availability~~ to support our common stock repurchase program, to reinvest in our business through capital spending and to pay dividends on our common stock. In particular, we used ~~$419.4~~$346.5 million to repurchase ~~3.4~~2.4 million shares of Class A common stock, including shares surrendered for tax withholdings. We also used ~~$160.1~~$61.6 million for capital expenditures primarily associated with our global retail store expansion, construction and renovation of department store shop-in-shops, and investments in our facilities and technological infrastructure, and made cash dividend payments of ~~$55.8 million.~~$18.5 million during the three months ended June 30, 2012.

Transactions Affecting Comparability of Results of Operations and Financial Condition

The comparability of our operating results for the three-month ~~and nine-month~~ periods ended ~~December 31, 2011~~June 30, 2012 and ~~January 1,~~July 2, 2011 has been affected by certain transactions, including:

•

the assumption of control over the distribution of our previously licensed bedding and bath business on May 1, 2011 (see “Recent Developments”);

the restructuring plan initiated in May 2011 to reposition and upgrade our existing distribution network and merchandising operations in the Asia-Pacific region, which includes mainland China, Macau, Hong Kong, Taiwan, Malaysia, Singapore, Japan and South Korea ~~Licensed Operations Acquisition (as defined~~(the “Asia-Pacific Restructuring Plan”). This plan included the closure of approximately 95 stores and ~~discussed under~~~~“Recent Developments”~~)concession shops in the Greater China and Southeast Asia region that ~~occurred on January 1, 2011.~~do not support the new merchandising strategy, primarily during the fourth quarter of Fiscal 2012; and

•

the planned discontinuance of the majority of the products sold under the American Living brand effective for the Fall 2012 selling season (see “Recent Developments”).

The following discussion highlights, as necessary, the significant changes in operating results arising from ~~the above acquisition.~~transactions affecting comparability. However, unusual items or transactions may occur in any period. Accordingly, investors and other financial statement users individually should consider the types of events and transactions that have affected operating trends.

Recent Developments

Discontinuance of American Living

~~Subsequent to~~During the ~~third~~fourth quarter of Fiscal 2012, ~~the Company~~we decided ~~in connection~~ with ~~its exclusive~~our wholesale partner J.C. Penney Company, Inc. (“JCPenney”) to discontinue the majority of ~~its~~the products sold under theAmerican Living brand created for and exclusively sold to JCPenney, effective for the Fall 2012 wholesale selling season. The discontinuance of these American Living product lines is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated ~~or Wholesale results~~statement of operations.

~~Greater China Restructuring Plan~~Assumption of Bedding and Bath Operations

In May 2011, the license for ourLauren by Ralph Lauren bedding and bath products previously held by WestPoint Home, Inc. (“WPH”) expired in accordance with the underlying agreement and we initiated a restructuring plan to reposition and upgrade our existing distribution network in the Greater China region, which is comprised of mainland China, Macau, Hong Kong, Taiwan, Malaysia and Singapore. This plan includes a reduction in workforce and the closure of certain retail stores and concession shops that do not support the new merchandising strategy. Actionsassumed control over this wholesale business. No significant payment or other consideration was provided related to this license expiration. WPH remains the ~~restructuring plan continue to be refined and are anticipated to result in pretax charges of approximately $5 million to $10 million, primarily in the fourth quarter of Fiscal 2012.~~

~~South Korea Licensed Operations Acquisition~~

On January 1, 2011, in connection with the transition of the Ralph Lauren-branded apparel and accessories business in South Korea (the “Ralph Lauren South Korea Business”) from a licensed to a wholly owned operation, we acquired certain net assets (including inventory) and employees from Doosan Corporation (“Doosan”) in exchange for an initial payment of approximately $25 million plus an additional aggregate payment of approximately $22 million (the “South Korea Licensed Operations Acquisition”). Doosan was ourexclusive licensee for ~~the Ralph~~our Lauren South Korea business. We funded the South Korea Licensed Operations Acquisition with available cash on-hand. In conjunction with the South Korea Licensed Operations Acquisition, we also entered into a transition services agreement with Doosan for the provision of certain financialbasic bedding program, which includes utility and ~~information systems services, which was subsequently extended through June 30, 2012.~~blanket products.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Three Months Ended ~~December 31, 2011~~June 30, 2012 Compared to Three Months Ended ~~January 1,~~July 2, 2011

The following table summarizes our results of operations and expresses the percentage relationship to net revenues of certain financial statement captions:


	Three Months Ended						$ Change			% / bps Change		Three Months Ended
	December 31, 2011			January 1, 2011						% / bps Change	June 30, 2012				July 2, 2011				$ Change				% / bps Change
	(millions, except per share data)											(millions, except per share data)
Net revenues	$	1,805.6		$	1,548.0		$ Change	$	257.6		16.6%		$	1,593.4			$	1,526.4			$	67.0			4.4%
Cost of goods sold^(a)		(774.0	)		(640.1	)		(133.9	)	20.9%			(601.3	)			(564.9	)			(36.4	)		6.4%

Gross profit		1,031.6			907.9			123.7		13.6%			992.1				961.5				30.6			3.2%
Gross profit as % of net revenues		57.1	%		58.6	%				(150) bps			62.3	%			63.0	%						(70 bps)
Selling, general and administrative expenses^(a)		(754.3	)		(655.3	)		(99.0	)	15.1%			(693.4	)			(672.3	)			(21.1	)		3.1%
SG&A expenses as % of net revenues		41.8	%		42.3	%				(50) bps			43.5	%			44.0	%						(50 bps)
Amortization of intangible assets		(7.2	)		(6.3	)		(0.9	)	14.3%			(6.7	)			(7.1	)			0.4			(5.6%)

Operating income		270.1			246.3			23.8		9.7%			292.0				282.1				9.9			3.5%
Operating income as % of net revenues		15.0	%		15.9	%				(90) bps			18.3	%			18.5	%						(20 bps)
Foreign currency gains (losses)		(2.2	)		(2.6	)		0.4		(15.4)%			(2.6	)			(3.8	)			1.2			(31.6%)
Interest expense		(6.3	)		(4.3	)		(2.0	)	46.5%			(5.5	)			(6.1	)			0.6			(9.8%)
Interest and other income, net		2.7			1.8			0.9		50.0%			1.3				4.2				(2.9	)		(69.0%)
Equity in income (loss) of equity-method investees		(2.2	)		(2.8	)		0.6		(21.4)%			(1.3	)			(1.9	)			0.6			(31.6%)

Income before provision for income taxes		262.1			238.4			23.7		9.9%			283.9				274.5				9.4			3.4%
Provision for income taxes		(93.1	)		(70.0	)		(23.1	)	33.0%			(90.5	)			(90.4	)			(0.1	)		0.1%

Effective tax rate^(b)		35.5	%		29.4	%				610 bps			31.9	%			32.9	%						(100 bps)
Net income attributable to RLC	$	169.0		$	168.4		$	0.6		0.4%		$	193.4			$	184.1			$	9.3			5.1%

Net income per common share attributable to RLC:
Basic	$	1.83		$	1.76		$	0.07		4.0%		$	2.10			$	1.96			$	0.14			7.1%

Diluted	$	1.78		$	1.72		$	0.06		3.5%		$	2.03			$	1.90			$	0.13			6.8%

^(a)

Includes total depreciation expense of ~~$49.6~~$49.4 million and ~~$44.1~~$48.3 million for the three-month periods ended ~~December 31,~~June 30, 2012 and July 2, 2011, ~~and January 1, 2011,~~ respectively.

^(b)

Effective tax rate is calculated by dividing the provision for income taxes by income before provision for income taxes.

Net Revenues. Net revenues increased by ~~$257.6~~$67.0 million, or ~~16.6%~~4.4%, to ~~$1.806~~$1.593 billion in the ~~third~~first quarter of Fiscal ~~2012~~2013 from ~~$1.548~~$1.526 billion in the ~~third~~first quarter of Fiscal ~~2011.~~2012. The increase was primarily due to higher revenues from our ~~global~~ retail and wholesale businesses, which ~~included favorable~~were partially offset by net unfavorable foreign currency effects. Excluding the effect of foreign currency, net revenues increased by ~~$251.2~~$97.1 million, or ~~16.2%~~6.4%.

Net revenues for our three business segments are provided below:


	Three Months Ended				$ Change			% Change			Three Months Ended
	December 31, 2011		January 1, 2011		$ Change			% Change			June 30, 2012		July 2, 2011		$ Change		% Change
	(millions)										(millions)
Net Revenues:
Wholesale	$	750.0	$	676.3	$	73.7			10.9	%	$	694.1	$	673.0	$	21.1		3.1	%
Retail		1,006.0		821.6		184.4			22.4	%		857.3		813.5		43.8		5.4	%
Licensing		49.6		50.1		(0.5	)		(1.0)	%		42.0		39.9		2.1		5.3	%

Total net revenues	$	1,805.6	$	1,548.0	$	257.6			16.6	%	$	1,593.4	$	1,526.4	$	67.0		4.4	%

Wholesale net revenues — The net increase primarily reflects:

a ~~$77~~$63 million net increase in our domestic businesses ~~driven~~due in part byto incremental ~~home~~Home product revenues related to ~~the~~our assumption of control over the distribution of ~~our~~the previously licensed bedding and bath business ~~as of~~on May 1, 2011. The increase was also ~~reflected~~driven by higher menswear and womenswear revenues reflecting an increased ~~menswear revenues, including sales from~~presence at department store locations (including our newly ~~launched Ralph Lauren~~introduced business in Canada) and additional product line offerings (including the Denim & Supply Ralph Lauren product line ~~as well as higher childrenswear revenues; and~~launched during the second quarter of Fiscal 2012), partially offset by declines in certain of the related American Living product categories planned for discontinuance.

This increase was partially offset by:

~~a $25~~an $18 million net ~~increase in~~decrease related to our European businesses on a constant currency basis ~~primarily~~ driven by ~~increased revenues from~~reduced shipments across our core menswear, womenswear and ~~accessories (including footwear)~~childrenswear product lines due to timing and also reflecting ~~new product offerings~~the challenging European retail environment and ~~an increased presence at department stores. This sales growth was achieved despite a~~ continued softening in the specialty store business, particularly in Southern Europe.

These ~~increases~~decreases were partially offset ~~by:~~by increased sales from our accessories product lines (including footwear), driven by new product offerings and an increased department store presence;

a ~~$23~~$15 million net decrease in revenues due to net unfavorable foreign currency effects primarily related to the weakening of the Euro in comparison to the U.S. Dollar during the first quarter of Fiscal 2013;

a $6 million net decrease related to our Japanese businesses on a constant currency basis, ~~including~~primarily due to increased promotional activity and the effect of a business model shift to the Retail concessions-based channel; and

a $5$3 million net decrease inrelated to our businesses in the Greater China and Southeast Asia region ~~which is comprised of China, Hong Kong, Indonesia, Malaysia, the Philippines, Singapore, Taiwan and Thailand,~~ on a constant currency ~~basis.~~basis, primarily due to the elimination of certain third-party distribution in connection with our repositioning efforts in the region as part of the Asia-Pacific Restructuring Plan, largely during the fourth quarter of Fiscal 2012.

Retail net revenues — For purposes of the discussion of Retail operating performance below, we refer to the measure “comparable store sales.” Comparable store sales refer to the growth of sales in stores that are open for at least one full fiscal year. Sales for stores that are closing during a fiscal year are excluded from the calculation of comparable store sales. Sales for stores that are either relocated, enlarged (as defined by gross square footage expansion of 25% or greater) or generally closed for 30 or more consecutive days for renovation are also excluded from the calculation of comparable store sales until such stores have been in their new location or in a newly renovated state for at least one full fiscal year. ~~Comparable~~Consolidated comparable store sales information includes our ~~full-price~~ Ralph Lauren stores (including concession-based shop-within-shops, as well as Rugby and ~~Rugby~~RRL stores), factory stores, Club Monaco stores and Ralph Lauren e-commerce sites, which include RalphLauren.com, ~~(including Rugby.com).~~Rugby.com and RalphLauren.co.uk.

Beginning in Fiscal 2013, we have presented our comparable store sales growth as a single, consolidated metric. We believe this combined measure is better aligned with the integrated, multi-channel approach that we employ in managing our Retail business on a global basis. This change has no effect on our total comparable store sales.

The net increase in Retail net revenues primarily reflects:

~~a $105 million aggregate net increase in non-comparable store sales primarily driven by:~~

ana $7 million, or 1%, aggregate net increase in consolidated comparable store sales, primarily driven by increases from our global factory stores and Ralph Lauren e-commerce operations, largely offset by decreases in comparable store sales from our Ralph Lauren stores in Europe and concession shops in Asia. Our consolidated comparable store sales included a net aggregate unfavorable foreign currency effect of approximately ~~$55~~$13 million, ~~related~~primarily due to the weakening of the Euro in comparison to the U.S. Dollar during the first quarter of Fiscal 2013. Excluding the effect of foreign currency, our consolidated comparable store sales increased by 3% during the first quarter of Fiscal 2013 as compared to the first quarter of Fiscal 2012; and

Ø
a $37 million, or 41%, aggregate net increase in non-comparable store sales driven by a number of new ~~full-price~~brick and ~~factory~~mortar store openings ~~within~~over the past twelve months, as well as our recently launched European ~~retail~~Ralph Lauren e-commerce sites in ~~the United Kingdom,~~ France and ~~Germany.~~Germany and Club Monaco e-commerce sites in North America, which more than offset the impact of store closings in the Asia-Pacific region due to our network repositioning initiative. This increase ~~includes~~is net of an aggregate ~~favorable~~unfavorable foreign currency effect of approximately $3$2 million, primarily related to the ~~strengthening~~weakening of the ~~Yen~~Euro in comparison to the U.S. ~~dollar~~Dollar during the ~~third~~first quarter of Fiscal ~~2012. Excluding those stores and shops assumed in connection with the South Korea Licensed Operations Acquisition, there was a net increase in our average global brick and mortar store~~

count of 13 stores and concession shops as compared to the third quarter of Fiscal 2011. Our total brick and mortar store count as of December 31, 2011 included 378 freestanding stores and 508 concession shops, including 6 freestanding stores and 172 concession shops in South Korea; and2013.

~~the inclusion of approximately $50 million of revenues from stores and concession-based shop-within-shops assumed in connection with the South Korea Licensed Operations Acquisition.~~

~~a $53 million aggregate net increase in comparable~~The following table details our Retail brick and mortar store ~~sales primarily driven by our global factory stores. This increase includes an aggregate favorable foreign currency effect~~and e-commerce presence as of approximately $4 million primarily related to the strengthening of the Yen in comparison to the U.S. dollar during the third quarter of Fiscal 2012. The increase in Retail net revenues was also due to a $26 million increase in RalphLauren.com sales. Comparable store sales are presented below:June 30, 2012:


		~~Three Months Ended~~June 30, 2012
		~~December 31, 2011~~
~~Increases in comparable store sales as reported:~~Brick and Mortar Stores:
~~Full-price Ralph Lauren store sales~~Freestanding stores			379	7	%
~~Full-price Club Monaco store sales .~~Concession shops			478	17
	%
~~Factory store sales~~Total brick and mortar stores				9	%
~~RalphLauren.com sales~~ 857				31	%
~~Total increase in comparable store sales as reported~~				12	%

~~Increases in comparable store sales excluding the effect of foreign currency:~~E-commerce Sites:
~~Full-price Ralph Lauren store sales~~				5	%
~~Full-price Club Monaco store sales~~				17	%
~~Factory store sales~~				9	%
~~RalphLauren.com sales~~				31	%
~~Total increase in comparable store sales excluding the effect of foreign currency~~North American sites^(a)			4	12
European sites^(b)	%		3

Total e-commerce sites			7

^(a)

Servicing the U.S. and Canada.

^(b⁾

Servicing the U.K., France, Belgium, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Germany and Austria.

Licensing revenues — The ~~slight~~ net ~~decrease~~increase in revenues primarily ~~reflects:~~

~~an approximate $1~~reflects a $3 million ~~decrease~~increase in ~~international~~domestic product licensing royalties primarily due to ~~the South Korea Licensed Operations Acquisition;~~higher apparel and

~~an approximate~~ fragrance-related royalties, partially offset by a $1 million decrease in ~~home~~Home licensing revenues ~~primarily due to~~driven by the transition of our previously licensed bedding and bath business to directly controlled operations as of May 1, 2011.

~~The above decreases were largely offset by:~~

~~an approximate $2 million increase in domestic product licensing royalties primarily driven by higher apparel and fragrance-related royalties.~~

Gross Profit. Cost of goods sold includes the expenses incurred to acquire and produce inventory for sale, including product costs, freight-in and import costs, as well as changes in reserves for shrinkage and inventory realizability. The costs of selling merchandise, including those associated with preparing the merchandise for sale, such as picking, packing, warehousing and order charges, are included in SG&A expenses.

Gross profit increased by ~~$123.7~~$30.6 million, or ~~13.6%~~3.2%, to ~~$1.032 billion~~$992.1 million in the ~~third~~first quarter of Fiscal ~~2012~~2013 from ~~$907.9~~$961.5 million in the ~~third~~first quarter of Fiscal ~~2011.~~2012. Gross profit as a percentage of net revenues decreased by ~~150~~70 basis points to ~~57.1%~~62.3% in the ~~third~~first quarter of Fiscal ~~2012~~2013 from ~~58.6%~~63.0% in the ~~third~~first quarter of Fiscal ~~2011.~~2012. This decrease was primarily due to lower ~~global Wholesale~~Retail gross margins reflecting ~~substantial~~ sourcing cost ~~increases which more than~~pressures across most of our global retail businesses, partially offset by targeted pricing actions and increased gross margins from our operations in Asia reflecting improved inventory management and lower reductions in the carrying cost of our retail inventory as ~~well as~~we reposition our recently acquired businesses in the ~~effect of an unfavorable channel mix within our European wholesale businesses.~~region. The overall decline in gross profit margin was also due to lower Wholesale gross profit margins reflecting a less favorable customer mix in our European businesses due in part to the current economic environment, as ~~a percentage of net revenues was~~well as unfavorable foreign currency effects, partially offset by ~~slightly higher Retail~~increased gross margins ~~as elevated promotional activity across~~from our domestic businesses ~~and global sourcing cost pressures were more than offset by the effects of a more favorable geographic and product mix~~ driven by ~~our retail businesses~~lower sourcing costs compared to higher cost benchmarks created in ~~Europe and Asia (including our recently acquired business in South Korea) and targeted pricing actions.~~the prior year period.

Gross profit as a percentage of net revenues is dependent upon a variety of factors, including changes in the relative sales mix among distribution channels, changes in the mix of products sold, the timing and level of promotional activities, foreign currency exchange rates, and fluctuations in material costs. These factors, among others, may cause gross profit as a percentage of net revenues to fluctuate from period to period.

We expect that current macroeconomic challenges, including inflationary pressures on raw materials and labor costs and labor shortages in certain regions where our products are manufactured, will continue to negatively affect the cost of most of our products and related gross profit percentages for at least the remainder of Fiscal 2012. See “~~Global Economic Developments~~~~” for further discussion of the current macroeconomic environment.~~

Selling, General and Administrative Expenses. SG&A expenses primarily include compensation and benefits, marketing, distribution, bad debts, information technology, facilities, legal and other costs associated with finance and administration. SG&A expenses increased by ~~$99.0~~$21.1 million, or ~~15.1%~~3.1%, to ~~$754.3~~$693.4 million in the ~~third~~first quarter of Fiscal ~~2012~~2013 from ~~$655.3~~$672.3 million in the ~~third~~first quarter of Fiscal ~~2011.~~2012. This increase included ~~an unfavorable~~a net favorable foreign currency effect of approximately $8$12 million, primarily related to the ~~strengthening~~weakening of the ~~Yen~~Euro in comparison to the U.S. ~~dollar~~Dollar during the ~~third~~first quarter of Fiscal ~~2012.~~2013. SG&A expenses as a percentage of net revenues decreased to ~~41.8%~~43.5% in the ~~third~~first quarter of Fiscal ~~2012~~2013 from ~~42.3%~~44.0% in the ~~third~~first quarter of Fiscal ~~2011.~~2012. The 50 basis point ~~decline~~improvement was primarily due to operating leverage on higher net revenues, partially offset by an increase in operating expenses ~~attributable~~ to support the growth of our ~~recent acquisitions~~retail business and new business ~~initiatives.~~initiatives, as well as the shift in channel mix to a greater retail concentration. The ~~$99.0~~$21.1 million increase in SG&A expenses was primarily driven by:

~~the inclusion of incremental SG&A costs of approximately $30 million related to our acquired business in South Korea (see “Recent Developments” for further discussion);~~

higher compensation-related costs of approximately ~~$22~~$11 million primarily related to anhigher salaries associated with the increase in ~~incentive-based~~retail sales and higher stock-based compensation ~~expenses;~~costs;

an approximate $13 million increase in rent and occupancy costs primarily to support the ongoing growth of our global businesses, including an increase in concessions-based rent expense primarily due to a business model change in Japan;

~~increased~~higher shipping, warehousing and distribution expenses of approximately $9$5 million to support increased sales;

~~an approximate $5~~higher selling costs of approximately $2 million ~~increase in depreciation expense primarily associated with global retail store expansion;~~to support our business growth; and

increased ~~consulting~~ costs of approximately $5$2 million ~~including costs~~ relating to new global information technology systems.

Amortization of Intangible Assets. Amortization of intangible assets ~~increased~~decreased by ~~$0.9~~$0.4 million, or ~~14.3%~~5.6%, to ~~$7.2~~$6.7 million in the ~~third~~first quarter of Fiscal ~~2012~~2013 from ~~$6.3~~$7.1 million in the ~~third~~first quarter of Fiscal ~~2011.~~2012. This ~~increase was primarily due to~~decrease reflected the ~~amortization~~absence of ~~the~~expense for certain intangible assets ~~acquired in connection with the South Korea Licensed Operations Acquisition at~~that were fully amortized as of the end of ~~the third quarter of~~ Fiscal ~~2011.~~2012.

Operating Income. Operating income increased by ~~$23.8~~$9.9 million, or ~~9.7%~~3.5%, to ~~$270.1~~$292.0 million in the ~~third~~first quarter of Fiscal ~~2012~~2013 from ~~$246.3~~$282.1 million in the ~~third~~first quarter of Fiscal ~~2011.~~2012. Operating income as a percentage of net revenues declined 9020 basis points, to ~~15.0%~~18.3% in the ~~third~~first quarter of Fiscal ~~2012~~2013 from ~~15.9%~~18.5% in the ~~third~~first quarter of Fiscal ~~2011.~~2012. The decrease in operating income as a percentage of net revenues primarily reflected the decline in gross profit margin, partially offset by the decrease in SG&A expenses as a percentage of net revenues, both as previously discussed.

Operating income and margin for our three business segments is provided below:


	Three Months Ended												$ Change			Margin Change		Three Months Ended
	December 31, 2011						January 1, 2011										June 30, 2012							July 2, 2011
	Operating Income			Operating Margin			Operating Income			Operating Margin							Operating Income				Operating Margin			Operating Income				Operating Margin			$ Change				Margin Change
	(millions)						(millions)							(millions)					(millions)							(millions)							(millions)
Segment:
Wholesale	$	115.5			15.4	%	$	130.3			19.3	%	$	(14.8	)	(390) bps		$	155.5			22.4	%		$	151.1			22.5	%		$	4.4			(10 bps)
Retail		194.4			19.3	%		152.9			18.6	%		41.5		70 bps			180.2			21.0	%			173.1			21.3	%			7.1			(30 bps)
Licensing		31.9			64.3	%		29.7			59.3	%		2.2		500 bps			26.6			63.3	%			25.2			63.2	%			1.4			10 bps

		341.8						312.9						28.9					362.3							349.4							12.9
Unallocated corporate expenses		(71.7	)					(66.6	)					(5.1	)				(70.3	)						(67.3	)						(3.0	)

Total operating income	$	270.1			15.0	%	$	246.3			15.9	%	$	23.8		(90) bps		$	292.0			18.3	%		$	282.1			18.5	%		$	9.9			(20 bps)

Wholesale operating margindecreased by ~~390~~10 basis points, primarily due to lower ~~global~~ gross profit margins ~~reflecting significant sourcing cost increases which more than offset pricing actions, as well as the effect of an unfavorable channel~~driven by a less favorable customer mix in ~~Europe during~~our European businesses, partially offset by increased gross profit margins from our domestic businesses reflecting decreased sourcing costs compared to the ~~third quarter of Fiscal 2012.~~higher cost benchmarks created in the prior year period. The ~~decline~~decrease in ~~operating margin~~gross profit margins was ~~also due to~~largely offset by an ~~increase~~improvement in SG&A expenses as a percentage of net revenues ~~largely~~as a result of improved operating leverage driven by ~~additional costs to support~~ our ~~new business initiatives, including the recent assumption of our previously licensed bedding and bath business and the global launch of our new Denim & Supply product line.~~domestic businesses.

Retail operating margin~~increased~~ decreased by 7030 basis points, primarily due to ~~a decline~~lower gross profit margins reflecting cost of goods increases across most of our global retail businesses, partially offset by the effect of targeted pricing actions and increased gross margins from our operations in Asia driven by improved inventory management and lower reductions in the carrying cost of our retail inventory as we reposition our recently acquired businesses in the region. The decrease in gross profit margins was offset in part by an improvement in SG&A ~~expense~~expenses as a percentage of net revenues ~~due to~~as a result of improved operating leverage on a global basis. The improvement in operating margin also reflected slightly higher gross margins, as global sourcing cost pressures and elevated domestic promotional activity were more than offset by targeted global pricing actions and the effect of a more favorable geographic and product mix driven by our ~~retail~~ businesses in Europe and ~~Asia.~~Asia, which more than offset the additional operating expenses incurred to support the ongoing growth of our international retail businesses, including e-commerce.

Licensing operating marginincreased by ~~500~~10 basis points, primarily ~~due to lower net costs associated with the transition~~as a result of ~~our licensed businesses to wholly owned operations, including our recently acquired business in South Korea, partially offset by a slight decline in~~higher revenues.

Unallocated corporate expensesincreased by ~~$5.1~~$3.0 million, primarily due to increased compensation-related costs, including ~~higher~~stock-based compensation, and increased information ~~technology-related~~technology related costs.

Foreign Currency Gains (Losses). The effect of foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations resulted in a loss of ~~$2.2~~$2.6 million in the ~~third~~first quarter of Fiscal ~~2012,~~2013, compared to a loss of ~~$2.6~~$3.8 million in the ~~third~~first quarter of Fiscal ~~2011.~~2012. The decline primarily reflected ~~$1.2 million of~~ lower losses relating to foreign currency hedge contracts, partially offset by an increase in foreign currency losses due to the timing of the settlement of foreign currency-denominated third party and intercompany receivables and payables (that were not of a long-term investment nature).contracts. Foreign currency gains and losses are unrelated to the impact of changes in the value of the U.S. ~~dollar~~Dollar when operating results of our foreign subsidiaries are translated to U.S. ~~dollars.~~Dollars.

Interest Expense. Interest expense includes the borrowing costs of our outstanding debt, including amortization of debt issuance costs, interest related to our capital lease obligations and amortization of certain deferred gains or losses on derivative instruments. Interest expense ~~increased~~decreased by ~~$2.0~~$0.6 million, or ~~46.5%~~9.8%, to ~~$6.3~~$5.5 million in the ~~third~~first quarter of Fiscal ~~2012~~2013 from ~~$4.3~~$6.1 million in the ~~third~~first quarter of Fiscal ~~2011.~~2012. The ~~increase~~decrease in interest expense was primarily due to ~~amortization~~the favorable foreign currency effects due to the weakening of the ~~loss associated with the termination of an interest rate swap~~Euro during the ~~first quarter of Fiscal~~three months ended June 30, 2012 ~~(see Note 12~~as compared to the ~~accompanying unaudited interim consolidated financial statements).~~three months ended July 2, 2011.

Interest and Other Income, net. Interest and other income, net, ~~increased~~decreased by ~~$0.9~~$2.9 million, or ~~50.0%~~69.0%, to ~~$2.7~~$1.3 million in the ~~third~~first quarter of Fiscal ~~2012~~2013 from ~~$1.8~~$4.2 million in the ~~third~~first quarter of Fiscal ~~2011.~~2012. The ~~increase~~decrease was ~~primarily~~principally due to ~~higher yields, particularly related to~~lower rates of interest and lower investment balances associated with our European investment portfolio, ~~during~~as well as the ~~third quarter~~inclusion of ~~Fiscal 2012.~~pre-tax income of approximately $1.0 million in the prior year related to the change in fiscal year of the Company’s Japanese subsidiary to conform to our consolidated fiscal-year basis.

Equity in Income (Loss) of Equity-Method Investees. The equity in losses of equity-method investees of ~~$2.2~~$1.3 million and ~~$2.8~~$1.9 million ~~during~~recognized in the ~~third quarter~~first quarters of Fiscal ~~2012~~2013 and Fiscal ~~2011,~~2012, respectively, related to our share of losses from our joint venture, the Ralph Lauren Watch and Jewelry Company, S.A.R.L. ~~(the “RL Watch Company”)~~, which is accounted for under the equity method of accounting.

Provision for Income Taxes. The provision for income taxes represents federal, foreign, state and local income taxes. The provision for income taxes increased slightly by ~~$23.1~~$0.1 million, or ~~33.0%~~0.1%, to ~~$93.1~~$90.5 million in the ~~third~~first quarter of Fiscal ~~2012~~2013 from ~~$70.0~~$90.4 million in the ~~third~~first quarter of Fiscal ~~2011.~~2012. The slight increase in the provision for income taxes was primarily due to a higher overall level of pretax income, ~~as well as an increase~~largely offset by a decrease in our reported effective tax rate of ~~610~~100 basis points, to ~~35.5%~~31.9% for the ~~third~~first quarter of Fiscal ~~2012~~2013 from ~~29.4%~~32.9% for the ~~third~~first quarter of Fiscal ~~2011.~~2012. The ~~higher~~lower effective tax rate was primarily due to the absence of tax reserve reductions associated with the conclusion of tax examinations and certain favorable adjustments related to intercompany charges during the third quarter of Fiscal 2011, as well as the greater impact of unfavorable permanent items during the current period. The higher effective tax rate was partially offset by a greater proportion of earnings generated in lower-taxed jurisdictions during the ~~third~~first quarter of Fiscal ~~2012.~~2013. The effective tax rate differs from statutory rates due to the effect of state and local taxes, tax rates in foreign jurisdictions and certain nondeductible expenses. Our effective tax rate will change from period to period based on various factors including, but not limited to, the geographic mix of earnings, the timing and amount of foreign dividends, enacted tax legislation, state and local taxes, tax audit findings and settlements, and the interaction of various global tax strategies.

Net Income Attributable to RLC. Net income increased ~~slightly~~ by ~~$0.6~~$9.3 million, or ~~0.4%~~5.1%, to ~~$169.0~~$193.4 million in the ~~third~~first quarter of Fiscal ~~2012~~2013 from ~~$168.4~~$184.1 million in the ~~third~~first quarter of Fiscal ~~2011.~~2012. The ~~increase in~~higher net income primarily related to the ~~$23.8~~$9.9 million increase in operating income ~~largely offset by~~and the ~~$23.1 million increase~~decrease in ~~the provision for income taxes,~~our effective tax rate of 100 basis points, both as previously discussed.

Net Income per Diluted Share Attributable to RLC. Net income per diluted share increased by ~~$0.06,~~$0.13, or ~~3.5%~~6.8%, to ~~$1.78~~$2.03 per share in the ~~third~~first quarter of Fiscal ~~2012~~2013 from ~~$1.72~~$1.90 per share in the ~~third~~first quarter of Fiscal ~~2011.~~2012. The increase in diluted per share results was primarily ~~due to the lower weighted-average diluted shares outstanding during the third quarter of Fiscal 2012 driven by our share repurchases over the last twelve months.~~

~~Nine Months Ended December 31, 2011 Compared to Nine Months Ended January 1, 2011~~

~~The following table summarizes our results of operations and expresses the percentage relationship to net revenues of certain financial statement captions:~~

December 31, December 31, December 31, December 31,
   Nine Months Ended $ Change
% / bps
Change
   December 31,
2011 January 1,
2011
   (millions, except per share data)
Net revenues
   $ 5,236.6    $ 4,233.4    $ 1,003.2    23.7%
Cost of goods sold^(a)
   (2,164.9 ) (1,725.4 ) (439.5 ) 25.5%


Gross profit
   3,071.7    2,508.0    563.7    22.5%
Gross profit as % of net revenues
   58.7 % 59.2 % (50) bps
Selling, general and administrative expenses^(a)
   (2,146.9 ) (1,761.6 ) (385.3 ) 21.9%
SG&A expenses as % of net revenues
   41.0 % 41.6 % (60) bps
Amortization of intangible assets
   (21.8 ) (18.5 ) (3.3 ) 17.8%


Operating income
   903.0    �� 727.9    175.1    24.1%
Operating income as % of net revenues
   17.2 % 17.2 % 0 bps
Foreign currency gains (losses)
   (4.2 ) (1.2 ) (3.0 ) NM
Interest expense
   (18.8 ) (13.2 ) (5.6 ) 42.4%
Interest and other income, net
   9.3    5.2    4.1    78.8%
Equity in income (loss) of equity-method investees
   (5.2 ) (4.8 ) (0.4 ) 8.3%


Income before provision for income taxes
   884.1    713.9    170.2    23.8%
Provision for income taxes
   (297.5 ) (219.5 ) (78.0 ) 35.5%


Effective tax rate^(b)
   33.7 % 30.7 % 300 bps
Net income attributable to RLC
   $ 586.6    $ 494.4    $ 92.2    18.6%


Net income per common share attributable to RLC:

Basic
   $ 6.32    $ 5.15    $ 1.17    22.7%


Diluted
   $ 6.14    $ 5.01    $ 1.13    22.6%

^(a)	~~Includes total depreciation expense of $146.4 million and $124.3 million for the nine-month periods ended December 31, 2011 and January 1, 2011, respectively.~~

^(b)	~~Effective tax rate is calculated by dividing the provision for income taxes by income before provision for income taxes.~~

NM	~~Not meaningful.~~

~~Net Revenues.~~ Net revenues increased by $1.003 billion, or 23.7%, to $5.237 billion for the nine months ended December 31, 2011 from $4.233 billion for the nine months ended January 1, 2011. The increase was primarily due to higher revenues from our global retail and wholesale businesses, which included favorable foreign currency effects. Excluding the effect of foreign currency, net revenues increased by $894.3 million, or 21.1%.

~~Net revenues for our three business segments are provided below:~~

   Nine Months Ended    $
Change    %
Change
   December 31,
2011    January 1,
2011

(millions)

Net Revenues:

Wholesale
   $ 2,418.5       $ 2,026.1       $ 392.4       19.4 %
Retail
   2,680.8       2,072.9       607.9       29.3 %
Licensing
   137.3       134.4       2.9       2.2 %







Total net revenues
   $ 5,236.6       $ 4,233.4       $ 1,003.2       23.7 %

~~Wholesale net revenues~~ ~~— The net increase primarily reflects:~~

a $276 million net increase in our domestic businesses primarily due to increased menswear revenues, including sales from our newly launched Ralph Lauren Denim & Supply product line, higher childrenswear revenues, and incremental home product revenues related to the assumption of control over the distribution of our previously licensed bedding and bath business;

a $101 million net increase in our European businesses on a constant currency basis primarily driven by increased revenues from our menswear, womenswear and accessories (including footwear) product lines, reflecting new product offerings and an increased presence at department stores; and

a $49 million net increase in revenues due to favorable foreign currency effects primarily related to the strengthening of the Euro and the Yen, both in comparison to the U.S. dollar during the nine months ended December 31, 2011.

~~These increases were partially offset by:~~

~~a $37 million net decrease related to our Japanese businesses on a constant currency basis, including the effect of a business model shift to the Retail concessions-based channel.~~

~~Retail net revenues~~ ~~— The net increase primarily reflects:~~

~~a $362 million aggregate net increase in non-comparable store sales primarily driven by:~~

an increase of approximately $212 million related to a number of new full-price and factory store openings within the past twelve months, as well as our recently launched European retail e-commerce sites in the United Kingdom, France and Germany. This increase includes an aggregate favorable foreign currency effect of approximately $20 million primarily related to the favorable performance of the Euro and the Yen, both in comparison to the U.S. dollar during the nine months ended December 31, 2011. Excluding those stores and shops assumed in connection with the South Korea Licensed Operations Acquisition, there was a net increase in our average global brick and mortar store count of 36 stores and concession shops as compared to the nine months ended January 1, 2011. Our total brick and mortar store count as of December 31, 2011 included 378 freestanding stores and 508 concession shops, including 6 freestanding stores and 172 concession shops in South Korea; and

~~the inclusion of approximately $150 million of revenues from stores and concession-based shop-within-shops assumed in connection with the South Korea Licensed Operations Acquisition.~~

a $192 million aggregate net increase in comparable brick and mortar store sales primarily driven by our global factory and Club Monaco stores. This increase includes an aggregate favorable foreign currency effect of approximately $39 million, primarily related to the favorable performance of the Euro and the Yen, both in comparison to the U.S. dollar during the nine months ended December 31, 2011. The increase in Retail net revenues was also due to a $54 million increase in RalphLauren.com sales. Comparable store sales are presented below:


	~~Nine Months Ended~~
	~~December 31, 2011~~
~~Increases in comparable store sales as reported:~~
~~Full-price Ralph Lauren store sales~~		8	%
~~Full-price Club Monaco store sales~~		19	%
~~Factory store sales~~		14	%
~~RalphLauren.com sales~~		29	%
~~Total increase in comparable store sales as reported~~		14	%

~~Increases in comparable store sales excluding the effect of foreign currency:~~
~~Full-price Ralph Lauren store sales~~		4	%
~~Full-price Club Monaco store sales~~		19	%
~~Factory store sales~~		12	%
~~RalphLauren.com sales~~		29	%
~~Total increase in comparable store sales excluding the effect of foreign currency~~		12	%

~~Licensing revenues~~ ~~— The net increase in revenues primarily reflects:~~

~~a $10 million increase in domestic product licensing royalties, including higher apparel, accessories and fragrance-related royalties.~~

~~The above increase was partially offset by:~~

~~a $5 million decrease in international licensing royalties primarily due to the recent South Korea Licensed Operations Acquisition; and~~

~~a $2 million decrease in home licensing revenues primarily due to the transition of our previously licensed bedding and bath business to directly controlled operations.~~

~~Gross Profit.~~ Gross profit increased by $563.7 million, or 22.5%, to $3.072 billion for the nine months ended December 31, 2011 from $2.508 billion for the nine months ended January 1, 2011. Gross profit as a percentage of net revenues declined by 50 basis points to 58.7% for the nine months ended December 31, 2011 from 59.2% for the nine months ended January 1, 2011. This decrease was primarily due to sourcing cost increases experienced across our global businesses, particularly in our Wholesale segment, partially mitigated by consolidated targeted pricing actions. The decline in gross profit as a percentage of net revenues was also offset in part by a more favorable geographic and channel mix and stronger levels of full-price sell-throughs driven by our retail businesses in Asia.

~~Selling, General and Administrative Expenses.~~ SG&A expenses increased by $385.3 million, or 21.9%, to $2.147 billion for the nine months ended December 31, 2011 from $1.762 billion for the nine months ended January 1, 2011. This increase included an unfavorable foreign currency effect of approximately $53 million, primarily related to the performance of the Euro and the Yen, both in comparison to the U.S. dollar during the nine months ended December 31, 2011. SG&A expenses as a percentage of net revenues decreased to 41.0% in the nine months ended December 31, 2011 from 41.6% in the nine months ended January 1, 2011. The 60 basis point decrease was primarily due to operating leverage related to the increase in net revenues, which more than

offset the increase in operating expenses attributable to our recent acquisitions and new business initiatives and the shift in channel mix to a greater Retail concentration. The $385.3 million increase in SG&A expenses was primarily driven by:

~~higher compensation-related costs of approximately $124 million primarily due to higher incentive and stock-based compensation expenses;~~

~~the inclusion of SG&A costs of approximately $90 million related to our newly acquired business in South Korea (see “Recent Developments” for further discussion);~~

an approximate $49 million increase in rent and occupancy costs primarily to support the ongoing growth of our international businesses, including an increase in concessions-based rent expense primarily due to a business model change in Japan;

~~increased shipping, warehousing and distribution expenses of approximately $28 million to support increased sales;~~

~~an approximate $20 million increase in depreciation expense primarily associated with global retail store expansion;~~

~~increased consulting costs of approximately $20 million, including costs relating to new global information technology systems; and~~

~~increased brand-related marketing and advertising costs of approximately $10 million.~~

~~Amortization of Intangible Assets.~~ Amortization of intangible assets increased by $3.3 million, or 17.8%, to $21.8 million for the nine months ended December 31, 2011 from $18.5 million for the nine months ended January 1, 2011. This increase was primarily due to the amortization of the intangible assets acquired in connection with the South Korea Licensed Operations Acquisition at the end of the third quarter of Fiscal 2011.

~~Operating Income.~~ Operating income increased by $175.1 million, or 24.1%, to $903.0 million for the nine months ended December 31, 2011 from $727.9 million for the nine months ended January 1, 2011. Operating income as a percentage of net revenues remained consistent with the prior year-to-date period at 17.2% for the nine months ended December 31, 2011, as the decline in gross profit margin was offset by the decrease in SG&A expenses as a percentage of net revenues, as previously discussed.

~~Operating income and margin for our three business segments is provided below:~~

Nine Months Ended $
Change
Margin
Change
December 31, 2011 January 1, 2011
Operating
Income Operating
Margin Operating
Income Operating
Margin
(millions) (millions) (millions)
Segment:

Wholesale
$ 513.1    21.2 % $ 475.9    23.5 % $ 37.2    (230) bps
Retail
513.5    19.2 % 362.0    17.5 % 151.5    170 bps
Licensing
86.8    63.2 % 80.8    60.1 % 6.0    310 bps

1,113.4    918.7    194.7
Unallocated corporate expenses
(210.4 ) (190.8 ) (19.6 )

Total operating income
$ 903.0    17.2 % $ 727.9    17.2 % $ 175.1    —  bps

~~Wholesale operating margin~~decreased by 230 basis points, primarily due to lower gross profit margins in the U.S. and Europe, reflecting sourcing cost increases which more than offset pricing actions, as well as additional costs to support our new business initiatives (including the assumption of our previously licensed bedding and bath business during the nine months ended December 31, 2011). This decrease in Wholesale

~~operating margin was partially offset by a decrease in SG&A expenses as a percentage of net revenues due to improved operating leverage on global sales.~~

~~Retail operating margin~~increased by 170 basis points, primarily as a result of higher gross profit margins due to stronger full-price sell-throughs and a more favorable product and geographic mix driven by our retail businesses in Asia (including our recently acquired business in South Korea), as well as the effect of targeted global pricing actions, which more than offset the sourcing cost pressures experienced during the nine months ended December 31, 2011. The increase in Retail operating margin was partially offset by a net increase in SG&A expenses as a percentage of net revenues, primarily driven by an increase in operating expenses to support the ongoing growth of our international retail businesses, largely in South Korea.

~~Licensing operating margin~~increased by 310 basis points, primarily as a result of lower net costs associated with the transition of our licensed businesses to wholly owned operations, including our recently acquired business in South Korea, as well as increased revenues.

~~Unallocated corporate expenses~~~~increased by $19.6 million, primarily as a result of higher compensation related expenses and information technology related costs.~~

~~Foreign Currency Gains (Losses).~~ The effect of foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations resulted in a loss of $4.2 million for the nine months ended December 31, 2011, compared to a loss of $1.2 million for the nine months ended January 1, 2011. The higher foreign currency losses were primarily due to the timing of the settlement of foreign currency-denominated third party and intercompany receivables and payables (that were not of a long-term investment nature), partially offset by $0.3 million of lower losses relating to foreign currency hedge contracts. Foreign currency gains and losses are unrelated to the impact of changes in the value of the U.S. dollar when operating results of our foreign subsidiaries are translated to U.S. dollars.

~~Interest Expense.~~ Interest expense increased by $5.6 million, or 42.4%, to $18.8 million for the nine months ended December 31, 2011 from $13.2 million for the nine months ended January 1, 2011. The increase in interest expense was primarily due to amortization of the loss associated with the termination of an interest rate swap during the first quarter of Fiscal 2012 (see Note 12 to the accompanying unaudited interim consolidated financial statements), the unfavorable foreign currency effects due to the performance of the Euro during the nine months ended December 31, 2011 compared to the same prior year period, and interest on borrowings under the Global Credit Facility (as defined in Note 12 to the accompanying interim unaudited consolidated financial statements).

~~Interest and Other Income, net.~~ Interest and other income, net, increased by $4.1 million, or 78.8%, to $9.3 million for the nine months ended December 31, 2011 from $5.2 million for the nine months ended January 1, 2011. This increase was primarily due to higher yields, particularly related to our European investment portfolio, during the nine months ended December 31, 2011, as well as the inclusion of pretax income of approximately $1.0 million related to the change in fiscal year of the Company’s Japanese subsidiary, Ralph Lauren Corporation Japan (formerly “Polo Ralph Lauren Kabushiki Kaisha”), to conform to our consolidated fiscal-year basis during the first quarter of Fiscal 2012 (see Note 2 to the accompanying interim unaudited consolidated financial statements).

~~Equity in Income (Loss) of Equity-Method Investees.~~ The equity in losses of equity-method investees of $5.2 million and $4.8 million for the nine months ended December 31, 2011 and January 1, 2011, respectively, related to our share of losses from our joint venture, the RL Watch Company, which is accounted for under the equity method of accounting.

~~Provision for Income Taxes.~~ The provision for income taxes increased by $78.0 million, or 35.5%, to $297.5 million for the nine months ended December 31, 2011 from $219.5 million for the nine months ended January 1, 2011. The increase in provision for income taxes was primarily due to a higher overall level of pretax income, as well as an increase in our reported effective tax rate of 300 basis points to 33.7% for the nine months

ended December 31, 2011 from 30.7% for the nine months ended January 1, 2011. The higher effective tax rate was primarily due to the absence of tax reserve reductions associated with the conclusion of tax examinations and certain other discrete items during the nine months ended January 1, 2011, partially offset by a greater proportion of earnings generated in lower-taxed jurisdictions during the current year-to-date period. The effective tax rate differs from statutory rates due to the effect of state and local taxes, tax rates in foreign jurisdictions and certain nondeductible expenses. Our effective tax rate will change from period to period based on various factors including, but not limited to, the geographic mix of earnings, the timing and amount of foreign dividends, enacted tax legislation, state and local taxes, tax audit findings and settlements, and the interaction of various global tax strategies.

~~Net Income Attributable to RLC.~~ Net income increased by $92.2 million, or 18.6%, to $586.6 million for the nine months ended December 31, 2011 from $494.4 million for the nine months ended January 1, 2011. The increase in net income primarily related to the $175.1 million increase in operating income, partially offset by the $78.0 million increase in the provision for income taxes, both as previously discussed.

~~Net Income per Diluted Share Attributable to RLC.~~ Net income per diluted share increased by $1.13, or 22.6%, to $6.14 per share for the nine months ended December 31, 2011 from $5.01 per share for the nine months ended January 1, 2011. The increase in diluted per share results was due to the higher level of net income, as previously discussed, and the lower weighted-average diluted shares outstanding during the ~~nine months ended December 31, 2011~~first quarter of Fiscal 2013 driven by our share ~~repurchases.~~repurchases over the last twelve months.

FINANCIAL CONDITION AND LIQUIDITY

Financial Condition


	December 31, 2011			April 2, 2011			$ Change			June 30, 2012			March 31, 2012			$ Change
	(millions)												(millions)
Cash and cash equivalents	$	815.8		$	453.0		$	362.8		$	468.5		$	671.6		$	(203.1	)
Short-term investments		386.3			593.9			(207.6	)		563.0			515.7			47.3
Non-current investments		72.5			83.6			(11.1	)		82.1			99.9			(17.8	)
Long-term debt		(265.6	)		(291.9	)		26.3			(261.0	)		(274.4	)		13.4

Net cash and investments^(a)	$	1,009.0		$	838.6		$	170.4		$	852.6		$	1,012.8		$	(160.2	)

Equity	$	3,529.7		$	3,304.7		$	225.0		$	3,471.8		$	3,652.5		$	(180.7	)

^(a(a))

“Net cash and investments” is defined as cash and cash equivalents plus short-term and non-current investments, less total debt.

The ~~increase~~decrease in our net cash and investments position at ~~December 31, 2011~~June 30, 2012 as compared to ~~April 2, 2011~~March 31, 2012 was primarily due to ~~our operating cash flows, partially offset by~~ our use of cash to support treasury stock repurchases, capital expenditures and dividend ~~payments. We~~payments, partially offset by our operating cash flows during the three months ended June 30, 2012. Particularly, in the first quarter of Fiscal 2013, we used ~~$419.4~~$346.5 million to repurchase ~~3.4~~2.4 million shares of Class A common stock, including shares surrendered for tax withholdings, spent ~~$160.1~~$61.6 million for capital expenditures, and made cash dividend payments of ~~$55.8~~$18.5 million.

The ~~increase~~decrease in equity was primarily attributable to our ~~net income and equity issuances made pursuant to stock-based compensation arrangements,~~share repurchase activity, partially offset by our ~~share repurchase activity~~net income during the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~December 31, 2011.~~June 30, 2012.

Cash Flows

		December 31,			December 31,			December 31,
	Nine Months Ended						$ Change			Three Months Ended
	December 31, 2011			January 1, 2011			$ Change			June 30, 2012			July 2, 2011			$ Change
	(millions)												(millions)
Net cash provided by operating activities	$	784.2		$	594.3		$	189.9		$	268.7		$	212.4		$	56.3
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities		9.2			(240.8	)		250.0			(121.2	)		91.9			(213.1	)
Net cash used in financing activities		(421.1	)		(281.8	)		(139.3	)		(345.6	)		(330.7	)		(14.9	)
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents		(9.5	)		8.6			(18.1	)		(5.0	)		4.9			(9.9	)

Net increase in cash and cash equivalents	$	362.8		$	80.3		$	282.5
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents										$	(203.1	)	$	(21.5	)	$	(181.6	)

Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities. Net cash provided by operating activities increased to ~~$784.2~~$268.7 million during the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~December 31, 2011,~~June 30, 2012, as compared to ~~$594.3~~$212.4 million during the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~January 1,~~July 2, 2011. This net increase in operating cash flow was primarily driven by:

an increase ~~in net income before depreciation, amortization, stock-based compensation and other non-cash expenses;~~related to accounts receivable primarily due to higher cash collections during the three months ended June 30, 2012; and

an increase related to inventories primarily attributable to the timing of inventory receipts and the effects of ongoing inventory management across most of our businesses. The increase in operating cash flows also reflects subsiding sourcing costs during the three months ended June 30, 2012 as compared to the higher cost benchmarks created in the prior year period.

The above increases in operating cash flow were partially offset by a decrease related to income taxes due to the timing of income tax payments.

~~The above increases in operating cash flow were partially offset by:~~

a decrease related to accounts receivable primarily due to lower cash collections during the nine months ended December 31, 2011, which resulted in an increase in days sales outstanding compared to the prior year-to-date period;

~~a decrease related to accounts payable and accrued liabilities primarily due to the timing of payments; and~~

a decrease related to inventories primarily attributable to an increase in inventory levels to support our sales growth and product expansion, new store openings and recently acquired businesses, as well as the timing of inventory receipts. The higher inventory levels also reflect increased sourcing costs during the nine months ended December 31, 2011.

Other than the items described above, the changes in operating assets and liabilities were attributable to normal operating fluctuations.

Net Cash Provided by (Used in) Investing Activities. Net cash used in investing activities was $121.2 million during the three months ended June 30, 2012, as compared to $91.9 million of net cash provided by investing activities ~~was $9.2 million~~ during the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~December 31, 2011, as compared to $240.8 million of net cash used in investing activities during the nine months ended January 1,~~July 2, 2011. The net increase in cash ~~from~~used in investing activities was primarily driven by:

an increase in cash used to purchase investments, less proceeds from sales and maturities of ~~investments, less cash used to purchase~~ investments. During the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~December 31,~~June 30, 2012, we used $278.3 million to purchase investments and received $218.0 million of proceeds from sales and maturities of investments. On a comparative basis, during the three months ended July 2, 2011, we received ~~$1.248 billion~~$516.3 million of proceeds from sales and maturities of investments and used $1.070 billion to purchase investments. On a comparative basis, during the nine months ended January 1, 2011, we received $1.002 billion of proceeds from sales and maturities of investments and used $1.020 billion$377.5 million to purchase investments; and

~~a decrease~~an increase in ~~net~~ cash used in connection with capital expenditures. During the three months ended June 30, 2012, we spent $61.6 million for capital expenditures as compared to ~~fund our acquisitions and ventures from $67.8~~$39.3 million during the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~January 1, 2011~~July 2, 2011. Our capital expenditures were primarily associated with global retail store expenditures, store renovations, investments in our facilities and enhancements to $10.1 million during the nine months ended December 31, 2011. During the nine months ended January 1, 2011, we used $47.0 million to fund the South Korea Licensed Operations Acquisition and $17.0 million to fund the acquisition of certain finite-lived intellectual property rights.our global information technology systems.

Net Cash Used in Financing Activities. Net cash used in financing activities was ~~$421.1~~$345.6 million during the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~December 31, 2011,~~June 30, 2012, as compared to ~~$281.8~~$330.7 million during the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~January 1,~~July 2, 2011. The increase in net cash used in financing activities was primarily driven by:

an increase in cash used in connection with repurchases of our Class A common stock. During the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~December 31, 2011, 3.2~~June 30, 2012, 2.0 million shares of Class A common stock at a cost of ~~$395.1~~$300.0 million were repurchased pursuant to our common stock repurchase program and ~~0.2~~0.4 million shares of Class A common stock at a cost of ~~$24.3~~$46.5 million were surrendered or withheld in satisfaction of withholding taxes in connection with the vesting of awards under our 1997 Long-Term Stock Incentive Plan, as amended (the “1997 Incentive Plan”), and our 2010 Long-Term Stock Incentive Plan (the “2010 Incentive Plan”). On a comparative basis, during the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~January 1,~~July 2, 2011, ~~4.0~~2.5 million shares of Class A common stock at a cost of ~~$331.0~~$301.7 million were repurchased pursuant to our common stock repurchase program and ~~0.2~~0.1 million shares of Class A common stock at a cost of ~~$16.7~~$22.8 million were surrendered or withheld for ~~taxes;~~taxes.

anThe above increase in net cash used ~~to pay dividends. During the nine months ended December 31, 2011, we used $55.8~~in financing activities was partially offset by higher excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation arrangements of $9.1 million, ~~to pay dividends, as compared to $28.9 million during the nine months ended January 1, 2011, largely~~primarily due to an increase in the ~~quarterly cash dividend on~~number of shares vested and the overall increase in the price of our common stock ~~from $0.10 per share to $0.20 per share in February 2011; and~~

~~a decrease in cash received from exercise~~during the first quarter of ~~stock options. During the nine months ended December 31, 2011, we received $41.6 million from the exercise of employee stock options,~~Fiscal 2013 as compared to ~~$67.7 million during~~ the ~~nine months ended January 1, 2011.~~first quarter of Fiscal 2012.

Liquidity

Our primary sources of liquidity are the cash flows generated from our operations, the $500 million of availability under our Global Credit Facility (as defined below), our available cash and cash equivalents (most of which is considered permanently reinvested outside the U.S.) and investments, and our other available financing options. These sources of liquidity are used to fund our ongoing cash requirements, including working capital requirements, global retail store expansion and renovation, construction and renovation of shop-in-shops, investment in technological infrastructure, acquisitions, joint ventures, dividends, debt repayment/repurchase, stock repurchases, contingent liabilities (including uncertain tax positions) and other corporate activities. Management believes that our existing sources of cash, as well as our ability to access capital markets, will be sufficient to support our operating, capital and debt service requirements for the foreseeable future, including the ongoing development of our recently acquired businesses and our plans for further business expansion.

As discussed in the“Debt and Covenant Compliance”section below, we had no revolving credit borrowings outstanding under our Global Credit Facility as of ~~December 31, 2011.~~June 30, 2012. As discussed further below, we may elect to draw on our Global Credit Facility or other potential sources of financing for, among other things, a material acquisition, settlement of a material contingency (including uncertain tax positions) or a material adverse business or macroeconomic development, as well as for other general corporate business purposes. We believe that our Global Credit Facility is adequately diversified with no undue concentrations in any one financial institution. In particular, as of ~~December 31, 2011,~~June 30, 2012, there were nine financial institutions participating in the Global Credit Facility, with no one participant maintaining a maximum commitment percentage in excess of approximately 16%. Management has no reason at this time to believe that the participating institutions will be unable to fulfill their obligations to provide financing in accordance with the terms of the Global Credit Facility in the event of our election to draw funds in the foreseeable future.

Common Stock Repurchase Program

On May 24, 2011, our Board of Directors approved an expansion of our existing common stock repurchase program that allows us to repurchase up to an additional $500 million of Class A common stock. Repurchases of shares of Class A common stock are subject to overall business and market conditions.

During the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~December 31, 2011,~~June 30, 2012, we repurchased ~~3.2~~2.0 million shares of Class A common stock at a cost of ~~$395.1~~$300.0 million under our share repurchase program. The remaining availability under our common stock repurchase program was approximately ~~$577~~$277 million as of ~~December 31, 2011.~~

June 30, 2012. In addition, during the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~December 31, 2011, 0.2~~June 30, 2012, 0.4 million shares of Class A common stock at a cost of ~~$24.3~~$46.5 million were surrendered to, or withheld by, us in satisfaction of taxes in connection with the vesting of awards under the 1997 Incentive Plan and the 2010 Incentive Plan.

Repurchased and surrendered shares are accounted for as treasury stock at cost and ~~will be~~ held in treasury for future use.

On August 9, 2012, our Board of Directors approved a further expansion of our existing common stock repurchase program that will allow us to repurchase up to an additional $500 million of Class A common stock.

Dividends

Since 2003, we have maintained a regular quarterly cash dividend program on our common stock. On ~~February 8, 2011,~~May 21, 2012, our Board of Directors approved an increase to ~~our~~the quarterly cash dividend on our common stock from ~~$0.10~~$0.20 per share to ~~$0.20~~$0.40 per share. The ~~third~~first quarter Fiscal ~~2012~~2013 dividend of ~~$0.20~~$0.40 per share was declared on ~~December 19, 2011,~~May 22, 2012, was payable to stockholders of record at the close of business on ~~December 30, 2011,~~June 29, 2012, and was paid on ~~January~~July 13, 2012. Dividends paid amounted to ~~$55.8~~$18.5 million during the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~December 31, 2011~~June 30, 2012 and ~~$28.9~~$18.9 million during the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~January 1,~~July 2, 2011.

We intend to continue to pay regular quarterly dividends on our outstanding common stock. However, any decision to declare and pay dividends in the future will be made at the discretion of our Board of Directors and will depend on, among other things, our results of operations, cash requirements, financial condition and other factors that ~~our~~the Board of Directors may deem relevant.

Debt and Covenant Compliance

Euro Debt

As of ~~December 31, 2011,~~June 30, 2012, we had outstanding €209.2 million principal amount of 4.5% notes due October 4, 2013 (the “Euro Debt”). We have the option to redeem all of the outstanding Euro Debt at any time at a redemption price equal to the principal amount plus a premium. We also have the option to redeem all of the outstanding Euro Debt at any time at par plus accrued interest in the event of certain developments involving U.S. tax law. Partial redemption of the Euro Debt is not permitted in either instance. In the event of a change of control, each holder of the Euro Debt has the option to require us to redeem the Euro Debt at its principal amount plus accrued interest. The indenture governing the Euro Debt (the “Indenture”) contains certain limited covenants that restrict our ability, subject to specified exceptions, to incur liens or enter into a sale and leaseback transaction for any principal property. The Indenture does not contain any financial covenants.

As of ~~December 31, 2011,~~June 30, 2012, the carrying value of our Euro Debt was ~~$265.6~~$261.0 million, compared to ~~$291.9~~$274.4 million as of ~~April 2, 2011.~~March 31, 2012.

Revolving Credit Facilities

Global Credit Facility

We have a credit facility that provides for a $500 million senior unsecured revolving line of credit through March 2016, also used to support the issuance of letters of credit (the “Global Credit Facility”). Borrowings

under the Global Credit Facility may be denominated in U.S. ~~dollars~~Dollars and other currencies, including Euros, Hong Kong Dollars and Japanese Yen. We have the ability to expand the borrowing availability to $750 million, subject to the agreement of one or more new or existing lenders under the facility to increase their commitments. There are no mandatory reductions in borrowing ability throughout the term of the Global Credit Facility.

~~In August 2011, we borrowed $100.0 million under the Global Credit Facility to be used for general corporate purposes, which we subsequently repaid in November 2011.~~ As of ~~December 31, 2011,~~June 30, 2012, there were no borrowings outstanding under the Global Credit Facility and we were contingently liable for ~~$15.8~~$15.0 million of outstanding letters of credit.

The Global Credit Facility contains a number of covenants that, among other things, restrict our ability, subject to specified exceptions, to incur additional debt; incur liens, sell or dispose of assets; merge with or acquire other companies; liquidate or dissolve; engage in businesses that are not in a related line of business; make loans, advances, or guarantees; engage in transactions with affiliates; and make investments. The Global Credit Facility also requires us to maintain a maximum ratio of Adjusted Debt to Consolidated EBITDAR (the “leverage ratio”) of no greater than 3.75 as of the date of measurement for the four most recent consecutive fiscal quarters. Adjusted Debt is defined generally as consolidated debt outstanding plus 8 times consolidated rent expense for the last four consecutive fiscal quarters. Consolidated EBITDAR is defined generally as consolidated net income plus (i) income tax expense, (ii) net interest expense, (iii) depreciation and amortization expense and (iv) consolidated rent expense. As of ~~December 31, 2011,~~June 30, 2012, no Event of Default (as such term is defined pursuant to the Global Credit Facility) has occurred under our Global Credit Facility.

Chinese Credit Facility

~~We also have an~~On April 11, 2012, Ralph Lauren Trading (Shanghai) Co., Ltd., one of our subsidiaries, entered into a new uncommitted credit facility ~~in China~~with JPMorgan Chase Bank (China) Company Limited, Shanghai Branch (the “Bank”) that provides for a revolving line of credit of up to 100 million Chinese Renminbi (approximately $16 million) through April 10, 2013 (the “Chinese Credit Facility”). The Chinese Credit Facility replaced our previous credit facility, which provided for a revolving line of credit of up to 70 million Chinese Renminbi (approximately $11 ~~million as of December 31, 2011) through February 9, 2012~~million) (the ~~“Chinese~~“Prior Chinese Credit Facility”). ~~The~~Consistent with the Prior Chinese Credit Facility, isthe Chinese Credit Facility will be used to fund general working capital needs of our operations in China. The Chinese Credit Facility may also be used to support bank guarantees. As of June 30, 2012, there were no borrowings outstanding under the Chinese Credit Facility.

The borrowing availability under the Chinese Credit Facility is determined at the sole discretion of ~~JPMorgan Chase~~the Bank ~~(China) Company Limited, Shanghai Branch (the “Bank”)~~ and is subject to availability of the Bank’s funds and satisfaction of certain regulatory requirements. Borrowings under the Chinese Credit Facility are guaranteed by RLC and bear interest at either (i) at least ~~90%~~95% of the short-term interest rate published by the People’s Bank of China or (ii) a rate determined by the Bank at its discretion based on prevailing market conditions. The Chinese Credit Facility does not contain any financial covenants. ~~There were no borrowings outstanding under the Chinese Credit Facility as of December 31, 2011.~~

~~We plan to renew the Chinese Credit Facility at or around its maturity date of February 9, 2012 on similar terms as the existing facility, subject to prevailing market conditions.~~

Refer to Note 14 of the Fiscal ~~2011~~2012 10-K for detailed disclosure of the terms and conditions of our debt and our credit facilities.

MARKET RISK MANAGEMENT

As discussed in Note 16 to our audited consolidated financial statements included in our Fiscal ~~2011~~2012 10-K and Note 1211 to the accompanying unaudited interim consolidated financial statements, we are exposed to a variety of risks, including changes in foreign currency exchange rates relating to certain anticipated cash flows from our international operations and possible declines in the value of reported net assets of certain of our foreign operations, as well as changes in the fair value of our fixed-rate debt relating to changes in interest rates. Consequently, in the normal course of business we employ established policies and procedures, including the use of derivative financial instruments, to manage such risks. We do not enter into derivative transactions for speculative or trading purposes.

As a result of the use of derivative instruments, we are exposed to the risk that counterparties to our derivative contracts will fail to meet their contractual obligations. To mitigate the counterparty credit risk, we have a policy of only entering into contracts with carefully selected financial institutions based upon evaluation of their credit ratings and other financial factors. Our established policies and procedures for mitigating credit risk on derivative transactions include reviewing and assessing the creditworthiness of counterparties. We also enter into master netting arrangements with counterparties when possible to mitigate credit risk associated with our derivative instruments. As a result of the above considerations, we do not believe that we are exposed to any undue concentration of counterparty risk with respect to our derivative contracts as of ~~December 31, 2011.~~June 30, 2012. However, we do have in aggregate approximately $30 million of derivative instruments in net asset positions placed across three creditworthy financial institutions.

Foreign Currency Risk Management

We manage our exposure to changes in foreign currency exchange rates through the use of foreign currency exchange contracts. ~~Refer to~~See Note 1211 to the accompanying unaudited interim consolidated financial statements for a summarization of the notional amounts and fair values of our foreign currency exchange contracts outstanding as of ~~December 31, 2011.~~June 30, 2012.

Forward Foreign Currency Exchange Contracts

From time to time, we may enter into forward foreign currency exchange contracts as hedges to reduce our risk from exchange rate fluctuations on inventory purchases, intercompany royalty payments made by certain of our international operations, intercompany contributions made to fund certain marketing efforts of our international operations, interest payments made in connection with outstanding debt, and other foreign currency-denominated operational cash flows. As part of our overall strategy to manage the level of exposure to the risk of foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations, primarily to changes in the value of the Euro, the Japanese Yen, the Hong Kong Dollar, the ~~Swiss Franc and~~South Korean Won, the British Pound Sterling and the Swiss Franc, we hedge a portion of our foreign currency exposures anticipated over the ensuing twelve-month to two-year periods. In doing so, we use forward foreign currency exchange contracts that generally have maturities of three months to two years to provide continuing coverage throughout the hedging period.

Our foreign exchange risk management activities are governed by policies and procedures approved by our Audit Committee. ~~Our~~These policies and procedures provide a framework that allows for the management of currency exposures while ensuring the activities are conducted within our established guidelines. Our policies include guidelines for the organizational structure of our risk management function and for internal controls over foreign exchange risk management activities, including but not limited to authorization levels, transactional limits, and credit quality controls, as well as various measurements for monitoring compliance. We monitor foreign exchange risk using different techniques, including a periodic review of market value and sensitivity analyses.

Hedge of a Net Investment in Certain European Subsidiaries

We designate the entire principal amount of our outstanding Euro Debt as a hedge of our net investment in certain of our European subsidiaries. To the extent this hedge remains effective, changes in the carrying value of the Euro Debt resulting from fluctuations in the Euro exchange rate are reported in equity as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income.

Interest Rate Risk Management

During the first quarter of Fiscal 2011, we entered into a fixed-to-floating interest rate swap with an aggregate notional value of €209.2 million, which was designated as a fair value hedge to mitigate our exposure to changes in the fair value of our Euro Debt due to changes in the benchmark interest rate. The interest rate swap was executed to swap the 4.5% fixed interest rate on our Euro Debt for a variable interest rate. On April 11, 2011, we terminated the interest rate swap agreement at a loss of $7.6 million. This loss ~~has been~~was recorded as an adjustment to the carrying value of our Euro Debt and is being recognized within interest expense over the remaining term of the debt, through October 4, 2013. During each of the three-month ~~and nine-month~~ periods ended ~~December 31,~~June 30, 2012 and July 2, 2011, $0.8 million ~~and $2.3 million~~ of this loss ~~respectively,~~ was recognized as interest expense within our consolidated statements of operations.

As of ~~December 31, 2011,~~June 30, 2012, there have been no other significant changes in our interest rate and foreign currency exposures or in the types of derivative instruments used to hedge those exposures.

See Note 3 to the accompanying unaudited interim consolidated financial statements for further discussion of our interest rate and foreign currency exposures, and the types of derivative instruments used to hedge those exposures.

Investment Risk Management

As of ~~December 31, 2011,~~June 30, 2012, we had cash and cash equivalents on-hand of ~~$815.8~~$468.5 million, primarily invested in money market funds, time deposits and treasury bills with original maturities of 90 days or less. Our other significant investments included ~~$386.3~~$563.0 million of short-term investments, primarily in time deposits, ~~municipal~~government bonds, corporate bonds and ~~corporate bonds~~variable rate municipal securities with original maturities greater than 90 days; ~~$47.5~~$38.3 million of restricted cash placed in escrow with certain banks as collateral primarily to secure guarantees in connection with certain international tax matters; ~~$69.8~~$79.4 million of investments with maturities greater than one ~~year in municipal bonds and corporate bonds;~~year; $2.3 million of auction rate securities issued through a municipality; and $0.4 million of other securities.

We actively monitor our exposure to changes in the fair value of our global investment portfolio in accordance with our established policies and procedures, which include monitoring both general and issuer-specific economic conditions, as discussed further below. As of ~~December 31, 2011,~~June 30, 2012, we do not hold any investments in sovereign debt securities issued by Greece, Ireland, Portugal, Spain or Italy. See Note 1211 to the accompanying unaudited interim consolidated financial statements for further detail of the composition of our investment portfolio as of ~~December 31, 2011.~~June 30, 2012.

We evaluate investments held in unrealized loss positions for other-than-temporary impairment on a quarterly basis. Such evaluation involves a variety of considerations, including assessments of risks and uncertainties associated with general economic conditions and distinct conditions affecting specific issuers. We consider the following factors: (i) the length of time and the extent to which the fair value has been below cost, (ii) the financial condition, credit worthiness and near-term prospects of the issuer, (iii) the length of time to maturity, (iv) future economic conditions and market forecasts, (v) our intent and ability to retain our investment for a period of time sufficient to allow for recovery of market value, and (vi) an assessment of whether it is more-likely-than-not that we will be required to sell our investment before recovery of market value. No significant realized or unrealized gains or losses on available-for-sale investments or other-than-temporary impairment charges were recorded in any of the fiscal periods presented.

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Our significant accounting policies are described in Note 3 to the audited consolidated financial statements included in our Fiscal ~~2011~~2012 10-K. Our estimates are often based on complex judgments, probabilities and assumptions that our management believes to be reasonable, but that are inherently uncertain and unpredictable. It is also possible that other professionals, applying reasonable judgment to the same facts and circumstances, could develop and support a range of alternative estimated amounts. For a complete discussion of our critical accounting policies, see the “Critical Accounting Policies” section of the MD&A in our Fiscal ~~2011~~2012 10-K. The following discussion is only is intended to update our critical accounting policies for any significant changes in policy implemented during the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~December 31, 2011.~~June 30, 2012.

There have been no significant changes in the application of our critical accounting policies since ~~April 2, 2011.~~March 31, 2012.

~~Goodwill Impairment Assessment~~

We performed our annual impairment assessment of goodwill as of the beginning of the second quarter of Fiscal 2012. Based on the results of the impairment assessment as of July 3, 2011, we confirmed that the fair value of our reporting units significantly exceeded their respective carrying values and there are no reporting units at risk of impairment.

RECENTLY ISSUED ACCOUNTING STANDARDS

See Note 4 to the accompanying unaudited interim consolidated financial statements for a description of certain recently issued or proposed accounting standards which may impact our consolidated financial statements in future reporting periods.

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.

For a discussion of the Company’s exposure to market risk, see “Market Risk Management” presented in Part I, Item 2 —“MD&A”of this Form 10-Q and incorporated herein by reference.

Item 4. Controls and Procedures.

The Company maintains disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed in the reports that the Company files or submits under the Securities and Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to the Company’s management, including its Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures.

The Company carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of its management, including its Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to Rules 13(a)-15(e) and 15(d)-15(e) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934. Based on that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures are effective at the reasonable assurance level as of ~~December 31, 2011.~~June 30, 2012. Except as discussed below, there has been no change in the

Company’s internal control over financial reporting during the fiscal quarter ended ~~December 31, 2011,~~June 30, 2012, that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

~~South Korea Licensed Operations Acquisition~~

On January 1, 2011, the Company acquired control of the Ralph Lauren-branded apparel business in South Korea from Doosan that was formerly conducted under a licensed arrangement (the “South Korea Licensed Operations Acquisition”, as discussed in Note 5 to the accompanying unaudited interim consolidated financial statements). In connection with the South Korea Licensed Operations Acquisition, the Company has continued to develop supporting infrastructure covering all critical operations, including but not limited to, merchandising, sales, inventory management, customer service, distribution, store operations, real estate management, financeGlobal Operating and other administrative areas. As part of the continued development of this infrastructure, the Company has implemented and enhanced various processes, systems, and internal controls to support this business during the third quarter of Fiscal 2012.

~~Global~~ Financial ~~and~~ Reporting System Implementation

We are in the process of implementing a new global operating and financial ~~and~~ reporting system as part of a multi-year plan to integrate and upgrade our operational and financial systems and processes. The implementation of this global system is scheduled to occur in phases over the next several years. During the ~~third~~first quarter of Fiscal ~~2012,~~2013, we continued to develop and enhance those ~~domestic~~ operational and financial systems previously transitioned to the new global operating and financial ~~and~~ reporting system. The next phase of this implementation effort involves the migration of certain core areas of our domestic business to the new system, including customer order-to-cash settlement and global merchandise procurement to payment processing, beginning in the second half of Fiscal 2013. As the phased implementation of this new system occurs, we are experiencing certain changes to our processes and procedures which, in turn, result in changes in internal control over financial reporting. While we expect this new system to strengthen our internal financial controls by automating manual processes and standardizing business processes across our organization, management will continue to evaluate and monitor our internal controls as processes and procedures in each of the affected areas evolve. For a discussion of risks related to the implementation of new systems, see Item 1A — ~~“Risk~~“Risk Factors — Risks Related to Our Business — ~~Our business could suffer if~~Implementation of management information systems may negatively impact our ~~computer systems and websites are disrupted or cease to operate effectively”~~business” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended ~~April 2, 2011.~~March 31, 2012.

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings.

Reference is made to the information disclosed under Item 3 — “LEGAL PROCEEDINGS” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended ~~April 2, 2011.~~March 31, 2012. The following is a summary of recent litigation developments.

Derivative Action

On November 22, 2011, a shareholder derivative action was filed by City Pension Fund for Firefighters and Police Officers in the City of Pembroke Pines (the “Plaintiff”), an alleged shareholder purportedly acting on behalf of the Company, in the Supreme Court of the State of New York, County of New York, naming the Company, as a nominal defendant, and naming ~~each of the~~ members of the Board of Directors and certain members of Company management as defendants. The complaint alleges, among other claims, breaches of fiduciary duty and waste of corporate assets by the Company’s directors for permitting excessive compensation to, and alleged related party transactions with, the Company’s Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and certain other executives, and unjust enrichment by these executives. The Plaintiff seeks damages on behalf of the Company in an unspecified amount sustained from the alleged breaches of fiduciary duty and waste of corporate assets and seeks disgorgement of excessive compensation and benefits of related party transactions. The Plaintiff also demands it be awarded the costs and disbursements of the derivative action, including reasonable attorneys’ fees. On January 12, 2012, the Company and all defendants moved to dismiss the complaint. On June 19, 2012, the Court entered an order dismissing the action due to the Plaintiff’s failure to make a pre-suit demand on the Company’s Board of Directors. On July 5, 2012, the Plaintiff made a demand on the Company’s Board of Directors to investigate and take action to remedy the alleged wrongdoing detailed in the complaint.

Wathne Imports Litigation

On August 19, 2005, Wathne Imports, Ltd. (“Wathne”), Ralph Lauren’s then domestic licensee for luggage and handbags, filed a complaint in the U.S. District Court in the Southern District of New York against our Company and Mr. Ralph Lauren, our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, asserting, among other things, federal trademark law violations, breach of contract, breach of obligations of good faith and fair dealing, fraud and negligent misrepresentation. The complaint sought, among other relief, injunctive relief, compensatory damages in excess of $250 million and punitive damages of not less than $750 million. On September 13, 2005, Wathne withdrew this complaint from the U.S. District Court and filed a complaint in the Supreme Court of the State of New York, New York County, making substantially the same allegations and claims (excluding the federal trademark claims), and seeking similar relief. On February 1, 2006, the Court granted our motion to dismiss all of the causes of action, including the cause of action against Mr. Lauren, except for breach of contract related claims, and denied Wathne’s motion for a preliminary injunction. Following some discovery, we moved for summary judgment on the remaining claims. Wathne cross-moved for partial summary judgment. In an April 11, 2008 Decision and Order, the Court granted Ralph Lauren’s summary judgment motion to dismiss most of the claims against our Company, and denied Wathne’s cross-motion for summary judgment. Wathne appealed the dismissal of its claims to the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court. Following a hearing on May 19, 2009, the Appellate Division issued a Decision and Order on June 9, 2009 which, in large part, affirmed the lower Court’s ruling. On January 23, 2012, the Court granted our motion to exclude Wathne’s proposed damages report thereby limiting Wathne’s presently asserted damages theory and the amount of damages that may be asserted to a jury. The Court has permitted Wathne to revise its alleged damages analysis. ~~Accordingly, while~~Wathne has appealed the order of exclusion. While a trial ~~has~~had been scheduled for April 2012, at this time it is uncertain ~~whether~~when the matter will be reached for ~~trial at such time.~~trial. We intend to continue to contest the remaining claims in this lawsuit vigorously. Management does not expect that the ultimate resolution of this matter will have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial statements.

Other Matters

We are involved, from time to time, in litigation, other legal claims and proceedings involving matters associated with or incidental to our business, including, among other things, matters involving credit card fraud, trademark and other intellectual property, licensing, and employee relations. We believe that the resolution of

currently pending matters will not individually or in the aggregate have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial statements. However, our assessment of the current litigation or other legal claims could change in light of the discovery of facts not presently known or determinations by judges, juries or other finders of fact which are not in accord with management’s evaluation of the possible liability or outcome of such litigation or claims.

Item 1A.Risk Factors.

The Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended ~~April 2, 2011~~March 31, 2012 contains a detailed discussion of certain risk factors that could materially adversely affect the Company’s business, operating results and/or financial condition. There are no material changes to the risk factors previously disclosed, nor has the Company identified any previously undisclosed risks that could materially adversely affect the Company’s business, operating results and/or financial condition.

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.

Items 2(a) and (b) are not applicable.

(c)	Stock Repurchases

The following table sets forth the repurchases of shares of the Company’s Class A common stock during the fiscal quarter ended ~~December 31, 2011:~~June 30, 2012:

Total Number of
Shares
Purchased⁽¹⁾ Average
Price
Paid per
Share Total Number of
Shares Purchased
as Part of Publicly
Announced Plans
or Programs Approximate Dollar Value
of Shares That May Yet be
Purchased Under the Plans
or Programs
(millions)
October 2, 2011 to October 29, 2011
12,718    $ 123.45    12,718    $ 577
October 30, 2011 to December 3, 2011
—    —    —    577
December 4, 2011 to December 31, 2011
—    —    —    577

12,718    12,718


	Total Number of Shares Purchased⁽¹⁾			Average Price Paid per Share		Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs		Approximate Dollar Value of Shares That May Yet be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs⁽⁴⁾
								(millions)
April 1, 2012 to April 28, 2012		270	⁽²⁾	$	175.11		—	$	577
April 29, 2012 to May 26, 2012		1,339,851			149.27		1,339,851		377
May 27, 2012 to June 30, 2012		1,039,958	⁽³⁾		140.79		710,061		277

		2,380,079					2,049,912

⁽¹⁾

~~These~~Except as noted below, these repurchases were made onin the open market under the Company’s Class A common stock repurchase program.

⁽²⁾

Represents shares surrendered to, or withheld by the Company in satisfaction of withholding taxes in connection with the vesting of awards issued under the 2010 Long-Term Stock Incentive Plan and the 1997 Long-Term Stock Incentive Plan.

⁽³⁾

Includes approximately 0.4 million shares surrendered to, or withheld by the Company in satisfaction of withholding taxes in connection with the vesting of awards issued under the 2010 Long-Term Stock Incentive Plan and the 1997 Long-Term Stock Incentive Plan.

⁽⁴⁾

On August 9, 2012, the Company’s Board of Directors approved an expansion of the Company’s existing common stock repurchase program that will allow it to repurchase up to an additional $500 million of Class A common stock.

Item 6. Exhibits.


10.1		Amended and Restated Employment Agreement, made effective as of June 26, 2012, between Ralph Lauren Corporation and Ralph Lauren (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Form 8-K dated July 2, 2012).

10.2		Cliff Restricted Performance Share Unit with TSR Modifier Award Overview containing the standard terms of cliff restricted performance share unit awards under the 2010 Long-Term Stock Incentive Plan (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Form 8-K dated July 13, 2012).

31.1		Certification of Ralph Lauren, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, pursuant to 17 CFR 240.13a-14(a).

31.2		Certification of ~~Tracey T. Travis,~~Robert L. Madore, Senior Vice President and Interim Chief Financial Officer, pursuant to 17 CFR 240.13a-14(a).

32.1		Certification of Ralph Lauren, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

32.2		Certification of ~~Tracey T. Travis,~~Robert L. Madore, Senior Vice President and Interim Chief Financial Officer, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

101		Interactive data files pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T: (i) the Consolidated Balance Sheets at ~~December~~June 30, 2012 and March 31, ~~2011 and April 2, 2011,~~2012, (ii) the Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three-month ~~and nine-month~~ periods ended ~~December 31,~~June 30, 2012 and July 2, 2011, (iii) the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the three-month periods ended June 30, 2012 and ~~January 1,~~July 2, 2011, ~~(iii)~~(iv) the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the ~~nine months~~three-month periods ended ~~December 31,~~June 30, 2012 and July 2, 2011 and ~~January 1, 2011 and (iv)~~(v) the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

Exhibits 32.1 ~~32.2~~ and ~~101~~32.2 shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or otherwise subject to the liability of that Section. Such exhibits shall not be deemed incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.


		RALPH LAUREN CORPORATION

By:		/s/ ~~TRACEY T. TRAVIS~~ROBERT L. MADORE
		~~Tracey T. Travis~~Robert L. Madore
		Senior Vice President and Interim Chief Financial Officer
		(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)

Date: ~~February 8,~~August 9, 2012

5851

		000000000000			000000000000			000000000000			000000000000
Derivative Instrument^(a)	Gains (Losses) Recognized in OCI^(b)
	Three Months Ended						Nine Months Ended
	December 31, 2011			January 1, 2011			December 31, 2011			January 1, 2011
	December 31, 2011			January 1, 2011			December 31, 2011			January 1, 2011
				(millions)
Designated Cash Flow Hedges:
FC — Inventory purchases	$	11.3		$	1.2		$	35.1		$	(0.6	)
FC — I/C royalty payments		1.3			0.7			5.4			(6.8	)
FC — Interest payments		(0.1	)		0.6			(0.5	)		0.6
FC — Other		—			(0.3	)		(1.0	)		0.3

	$	12.5		$	2.2		$	39.0		$	(6.5	)

Designated Hedge of Net Investment:
Euro Debt	$	8.9		$	8.5		$	24.3		$	5.8

Total Designated Hedges	$	21.4		$	10.7		$	63.3		$	(0.7	)

		$000,000,		$000,000,		$000,000,		$000,000,		$000,000,		$000,000,
	December 31, 2011						April 2, 2011
Type of Investment	Short-term < 1 year		Non-current 1 - 3 years		Total		Short-term < 1 year		Non-current 1 - 3 years		Total
					(millions)
Held-to-Maturity:
Government bonds — U.S.	$	5.0	$	0.6	$	5.6	$	90.8	$	12.7	$	103.5

Total held-to-maturity investments	$	5.0	$	0.6	$	5.6	$	90.8	$	12.7	$	103.5

Available-for-Sale:
Government bonds — U.S.	$	8.6	$	2.4	$	11.0	$	32.3	$	68.1	$	100.4
Government bonds — non-U.S.		41.5		43.7		85.2		—		—		—
Corporate bonds — non-U.S.		62.2		23.1		85.3		—		—		—
Variable rate municipal securities — U.S.		42.9		—		42.9		14.5		—		14.5
Auction rate securities		—		2.3		2.3		—		2.3		2.3
Other securities		—		0.4		0.4		—		0.5		0.5

Total available-for-sale investments	$	155.2	$	71.9	$	227.1	$	46.8	$	70.9	$	117.7

Other:
Time deposits and other	$	226.1	$	—	$	226.1	$	456.3	$	—	$	456.3

Total Investments	$	386.3	$	72.5	$	458.8	$	593.9	$	83.6	$	677.5


	Total Number of Shares Purchased⁽¹⁾		Average Price Paid per Share		Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs		Approximate Dollar Value of Shares That May Yet be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs
							(millions)
October 2, 2011 to October 29, 2011		12,718	$	123.45		12,718	$	577
October 30, 2011 to December 3, 2011		—		—		—		577
December 4, 2011 to December 31, 2011		—		—		—		577

		12,718				12,718