Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act:

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No x

As of ~~March 15,~~June 5, 2012 there were ~~28,177,203~~28,185,610 shares of the registrant’s common stock outstanding.

We file reports with the Securities and Exchange Commission, including annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q and current reports on Form 8-K. The public may read and copy any materials we file with the SEC at its Public Reference Room at 100 F Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549. The public may obtain information on the operation of the Public Reference Room by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. We are an electronic filer, and the SEC maintains an Internet site at http://www.sec.gov that contains the reports, proxy and information statements, and other information that we file electronically. Our website address is http://www.lubys.com. Please note that our website address is provided as an inactive textual reference only. We make available free of charge through our website our annual report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, and all amendments to those reports as soon as reasonably practicable after such material is electronically filed with or furnished to the SEC. The information provided on our website is not part of this report, and is therefore not incorporated by reference unless such information is specifically referenced elsewhere in this report.


	February 15, 2012			August 31, 2011			May 9, 2012			August 31, 2011
	(Unaudited)						(Unaudited)
ASSETS
Current Assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	1,248		$	1,252		$	1,308		$	1,252
Trade accounts and other receivables, net		3,865			4,429			3,355			4,429
Food and supply inventories		4,881			4,191			5,047			4,191
Prepaid expenses		2,225			1,960			1,739			1,960
Assets related to discontinued operations		54			67			37			67
Deferred income taxes		2,883			2,865			2,875			2,865

Total current assets		15,156			14,764			14,361			14,764
Note receivable		197			0			187			—
Property held for sale		596			1,046			596			1,046
Assets related to discontinued operations		6,526			7,837			5,341			7,837
Property and equipment, net		168,482			166,963			171,211			166,963
Intangible assets, net		27,443			28,098			27,115			28,098
Goodwill		195			195			195			195
Deferred incomes taxes		7,246			7,680			6,066			7,680
Other assets		1,642			1,437			1,571			1,437

Total assets	$	227,483		$	228,020		$	226,643		$	228,020

LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Current Liabilities:
Accounts payable	$	14,812		$	14,226		$	14,412		$	14,226
Liabilities related to discontinued operations		462			608			521			608
Accrued expenses and other liabilities		16,535			18,588			18,490			18,588

Total current liabilities		31,809			33,422			33,423			33,422
Credit facility debt		19,500			21,500			14,500			21,500
Liabilities related to discontinued operations		1,256			1,220			1,287			1,220
Other liabilities		8,185			6,841			8,073			6,841

Total liabilities		60,750			62,983			57,283			62,983

Commitments and Contingencies
SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Common stock, $0.32 par value; 100,000,000 shares authorized; Shares issued were 28,677,203 and 28,651,277, respectively; Shares outstanding were 28,177,203 and 28,151,277, respectively		9,177			9,168
Common stock, $0.32 par value; 100,000,000 shares authorized; Shares issued were 28,685,610 and 28,651,277, respectively; Shares outstanding were 28,185,610 and 28,151,277, respectively								9,179			9,168
Paid-in capital		24,168			23,772			24,370			23,772
Retained earnings		138,163			136,872			140,586			136,872
Less cost of treasury stock, 500,000 shares		(4,775	)		(4,775	)		(4,775	)		(4,775	)

Total shareholders’ equity		166,733			165,037			169,360			165,037

Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity	$	227,483		$	228,020		$	226,643		$	228,020

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.


	Quarter Ended						Two Quarters Ended						Quarter Ended						Three Quarters Ended
	February 15, 2012			February 9, 2011			February 15, 2012			February 9, 2011			May 9, 2012			May 4, 2011			May 9, 2012			May 4, 2011
	*(12 weeks)*			*(12 weeks)*			*(24 weeks)*			*(24 weeks)*			*(12 weeks)*			*(12 weeks)*			*(36 weeks)*			*(36 weeks)*
SALES:
Restaurant sales	$	73,434		$	71,757		$	146,592		$	142,047		$	77,943		$	78,077		$	224,535		$	220,124
Culinary contract services		4,197			3,127			8,733			6,459			4,336			3,560			13,069			10,018
Franchise revenue		1,653			1,520			3,135			3,021			1,702			1,602			4,838			4,622
Vending revenue		131			132			278			285			148			160			426			445

TOTAL SALES		79,415			76,536			158,738			151,812			84,129			83,399			242,868			235,209
COSTS AND EXPENSES:
Cost of food		20,758			21,399			41,263			42,259			21,379			22,011			62,642			64,270
Payroll and related costs		25,400			25,190			50,487			50,234			25,708			26,259			76,195			76,493
Other operating expenses		16,147			16,835			33,660			35,038			17,412			17,219			51,073			52,256
Opening costs		42			38			77			144			33			34			110			178
Cost of culinary contract services		4,137			2,879			8,243			5,864			3,979			3,316			12,222			9,180
Depreciation and amortization		4,132			3,967			8,246			8,148			4,322			3,875			12,568			12,022
General and administrative expenses		6,737			6,491			13,547			13,004			7,195			6,981			20,742			19,985
Provision for asset impairments, net		0			84			175			84			—			—			175			84
Net loss (gain) on disposition of property and equipment		72			(35	)		81			(28	)
Net loss on disposition of property and equipment														124			28			205			—

Total costs and expenses		77,425			76,848			155,779			154,747			80,152			79,723			235,932			234,468

INCOME (LOSS) FROM OPERATIONS		1,990			(312	)		2,959			(2,935	)
INCOME FROM OPERATIONS														3,977			3,676			6,936			741
Interest income		2			1			3			4			3			—			6			4
Interest expense		(215	)		(553	)		(494	)		(1,171	)		(201	)		(579	)		(694	)		(1,751	)
Other income, net		190			290			407			514			265			356			672			870

Income (loss) before income taxes and discontinued operations		1,967			(574	)		2,875			(3,588	)		4,044			3,453			6,920			(136	)
Provision (benefit) for income taxes		603			(310	)		928			(1,216	)
Provision for income taxes														1,535			1,393			2,464			177

Income (loss) from continuing operations		1,364			(264	)		1,947			(2,372	)		2,509			2,060			4,456			(313	)
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of income taxes		(276	)		981			(656	)		801			(86	)		(369	)		(742	)		432

NET INCOME (LOSS)	$	1,088		$	717		$	1,291		$	(1,571	)
NET INCOME													$	2,423		$	1,691		$	3,714		$	119

Income (loss) per share from continuing operations:
Basic	$	0.05		$	(0.01	)	$	0.07		$	(0.09	)	$	0.09		$	0.07		$	0.16		$	(0.01	)
Assuming dilution		0.05			(0.01	)		0.07			(0.09	)		0.09			0.07			0.16			(0.01	)

Income (loss) per share from discontinued operations:
Basic	$	(0.01	)	$	0.04		$	(0.02	)	$	0.03		$	—		$	(0.01	)	$	(0.03	)	$	0.01
Assuming dilution		(0.01	)		0.04			(0.02	)		0.03			—			(0.01	)		(0.03	)		0.01

Net income (loss) per share:
Net income per share:
Basic	$	0.04		$	0.03		$	0.05		$	(0.06	)	$	0.09		$	0.06		$	0.13		$	—
Assuming dilution		0.04			0.03			0.05			(0.06	)		0.09			0.06			0.13			—

Weighted average shares outstanding:
Basic		28,365			28,172			28,329			28,168			28,377			28,257			28,344			28,224
Assuming dilution		28,410			28,172			28,359			28,168			28,445			28,304			28,396			28,224

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.


	Common Stock										Paid-In Capital		Retained Earnings			Total Shareholders’ Equity				Common Stock															Paid-In Capital				Retained Earnings				Total Shareholders’ Equity
	Issued				Treasury														Issued								Treasury
	Shares		Amount		Shares			Amount											Shares				Amount				Shares			Amount
BALANCE AT AUGUST 31, 2011		28,651	$	9,168		(500	)	$	(4,775	)	$	23,772		$	136,872		$	165,037				28,651			$	9,168			(500	)		$	(4,775	)			$	23,772			$	136,872			$	165,037
Net income		0		0		0			0			0			1,291			1,291				—				—			—				—					—				3,714				3,714
Share-based compensation expense		26		9		0			0			396		0			405				34				11			—				—				598				—				609

BALANCE AT FEBRUARY 15, 2012		28,677	$	9,177		(500	)	$	(4,775	)	$	24,168	$	138,163		$	166,733
BALANCE AT MAY 9, 2012																					28,686			$	9,179			(500	)		$	(4,775	)		$	24,370			$	140,586			$	169,360

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.


	Two Quarters ended						Three Quarters ended
	February 15, 2012			February 9, 2011			May 9, 2012			May 4, 2011
	*(24 weeks)*			*(24 weeks)*			(36 weeks)			(36 weeks)
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net income (loss)	$	1,291		$	(1,571	)
Net income							$	3,714		$	119
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by operating activities:
Provision for asset impairments, net of gains and losses on property sales		778			(1,705	)		907			(1,501	)
Depreciation and amortization		8,247			8,182			12,570			12,072
Amortization of debt issuance cost		52			417			77			619
Non-cash compensation expense		108			129			185			135
Share-based compensation expense		297			202			424			355
Tax benefit on stock options		0			(2	)
Reduction in tax benefit on stock options								—			61
Deferred tax expense (benefit)		415			(1,195	)		1,604			(26	)

Cash provided by operating activities before changes in operating assets and liabilities		11,188			4,457			19,481			11,834
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
(Increase) decrease in trade accounts and other receivables, net		571			(293	)		1,081			(1,521	)
Increase in food and supply inventories		(690	)		(551	)		(856	)		(913	)
Increase in prepaid expenses and other assets		(503	)		(521	)
Decrease in accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities		(441	)		(3,010	)
(Increase) decrease in prepaid expenses and other assets								49			(715	)
Increase (decrease) in accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities								959			(2,087	)

Net cash provided by operating activities		10,125			82			20,714			6,598

CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Increase in note receivable		(197	)		0			(187	)		—
Proceeds from disposal of assets and property held for sale		1,316			7,541			2,586			8,494
Acquisition of Fuddruckers assets		0			(265	)		—			(265	)
Purchases of property and equipment		(9,247	)		(2,985	)		(16,056	)		(5,140	)

Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities		(8,128	)		4,291			(13,657	)		3,089

CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Credit facility borrowings		19,200			88,100			31,400			95,750
Credit facility repayments		(21,200	)		(93,600	)		(38,400	)		(106,250	)
Debt issuance costs		(1	)		(225	)		(1	)		(221	)
Tax benefit on stock options		0			2			—			(61	)
Proceeds received on the exercise of stock options		0			27			—			27

Net cash used in financing activities		(2,001	)		(5,696	)		(7,001	)		(10,755	)

Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents		(4	)		(1,323	)
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents								56			(1,068	)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period		1,252			2,300			1,252			2,300

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	1,248		$	977		$	1,308		$	1,232

Cash paid for:
Income taxes	$	0		$	0		$	—		$	—
Interest		423			876			600			1,185

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements of Luby’s, Inc. (the “Company” or “Luby’s”) have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by GAAP for complete financial statements that are prepared for the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring adjustments) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. Operating results for the period ended ~~February 15,~~May 9, 2012 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the fiscal year ending August 29, 2012.

The consolidated balance sheet dated August 31, 2011, included in this Form 10-Q, has been derived from the audited consolidated financial statements at that date. However, this Form 10-Q does not include all of the information and footnotes required by GAAP for an annual filing of complete financial statements. Therefore, these financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and footnotes included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended August 31, 2011.

The results of operations, assets and liabilities for all units included in the cash flow improvement and capital redeployment plan discussed in Note 6 have been reclassified to discontinued operations in the statements of operations and balance sheets for all periods presented.

The Company’s fiscal year ends on the last Wednesday in August. Accordingly, each fiscal year normally consists of 13 four-week periods, or accounting periods, accounting for 364 days in the aggregate. However, every fifth or sixth year, the fiscal year consists of 53 weeks, accounting for 371 days in the aggregate; fiscal year 2011 was such a year. Each of the first three quarters of each fiscal year consists of three four-week periods, while the fourth quarter normally consists of four four-week periods. However, the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2011, as a result of the additional week, consisted of three four-week periods and one five-week period, accounting for 17 weeks, or 119 days, in the aggregate. Fiscal year 2012 contains 52 weeks. Comparability between quarters may be affected by the varying lengths of the quarters, as well as the seasonality associated with the restaurant business. Seasonality factors affecting a quarter include timing of holidays, weather and school years. Interim results may not be indicative of full year results.

GAAP establishes a framework for using fair value to measure assets and liabilities, and expands disclosure about fair value measurements. Fair value measurements guidance applies whenever other statements require or permit asset or liabilities to be measured at fair value.

GAAP establishes a three-tier fair value hierarchy, which prioritizes the inputs used to measure fair value. These tiers include:

Non-recurring fair value measurements related to impaired property and equipment consisted of the following:


			Fair Value Measurement Using											Fair Value Measurement Using
	Two Quarters Ended February 15, 2012		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)		Total Impairments			Three Quarters Ended May 9, 2012		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)		Total Impairments
Long-lived assets related to continuing operations	$	57	$	0	$	0	$	57	$	(175	)	$	57	$	0	$	0	$	57	$	(175	)
Long-lived assets related to discontinued operations	$	1,875	$	0	$	0	$	1,875	$	(510	)	$	1,875	$	0	$	0	$	1,875	$	(510	)

									$	(685	)									$	(685	)


			Fair Value Measurement Using											Fair Value Measurement Using
	Two Quarters Ended February 9, 2011		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)		Total Impairments			Three Quarters Ended May 4, 2011		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)		Total Impairments
Long-lived assets related to continuing operations	$	1,900	$	0	$	0	$	1,900	$	(84	)	$	1,900	$	0	$	0	$	1,900	$	(84	)
Long-lived assets related to discontinued operations	$	3,318	$	0	$	0	$	3,318	$	(383	)	$	3,193	$	0	$	0	$	3,193	$	(508	)

									$	(467	)									$	(592	)

No cash payments of estimated federal income taxes were made during the ~~two~~three quarters ended ~~February 15,~~May 9, 2012.

Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recorded based on differences between the financial reporting basis and the tax basis of assets and liabilities using currently enacted rates and laws that will be in effect when the differences are expected to reverse. Deferred tax assets are recognized to the extent future taxable income is expected to be sufficient to utilize those assets prior to their expiration. If current available information and projected future results raises doubt about the realization of the deferred tax assets, a valuation allowance is necessary. Such a valuation allowance was established in the fourth quarter ended August 26, 2009 through a charge to income tax expense which adversely affected the Company’s reported operating results. No adjustments were made to the valuation allowance for the ~~two~~three quarters ended ~~February 15,~~May 9, 2012. The valuation allowance partially offsets the Company’s deferred tax assets related to carryovers to future years of employment tax credits.

Management believes that adequate provisions for income taxes have been reflected in the financial statements and is not aware of any significant exposure items that have not been reflected in the financial statements. Amounts considered probable of settlement within one year have been included in the accrued expenses and other liabilities in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet. The Company does not anticipate any material change in the total amount of unrecognized tax benefits to occur within the next ~~seven~~four four-week periods prior to the end of fiscal year 2012.

The cost, net of impairment, and accumulated depreciation of property and equipment at ~~February 15,~~May 9, 2012 and August 31, 2011, together with the related estimated useful lives used in computing depreciation and amortization, were as follows:


	February 15, 2012			August 31, 2011			Estimated Useful Lives	May 9, 2012			August 31, 2011			Estimated Useful Lives
	*(In thousands)*							*(In thousands)*
Land	$	57,893		$	56,487		—	$	59,285		$	56,487			—
Restaurant equipment and furnishings		106,926			105,263		3 to 15 years		110,697			105,263			3 to 15 years
Buildings		162,967			162,327		20 to 33 years		164,687			162,327			20 to 33 years
Leasehold and leasehold improvements		30,067			31,026		Lesser of lease term or estimated useful life		30,124			31,026			Lesser of lease term or estimated useful life
Office furniture and equipment		6,844			6,823		3 to 10 years		6,910			6,823			3 to 10 years
Construction in progress		1,316			336		—		552			336			—

		366,013			362,262				372,255			362,262
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization		(197,531	)		(195,299	)			(201,044	)		(195,299	)

Property and equipment, net	$	168,482		$	166,963			$	171,211		$	166,963

Intangible assets, net	$	27,443		$	28,098		21 years	$	27,115		$	28,098			21 years

Goodwill	$	195		$	195		—	$	195		$	195			—

Intangible assets, net consist of the Fuddruckers trade name and franchise agreements and will be amortized. The Company believes the Fuddruckers’ brand name has an expected useful life of 21 years based on the expected use of its assets and the restaurant environment in which it is being used. The trade name represents a respected brand with customer loyalty and the Company intends to cultivate and protect the use of the trade name. The franchise agreements, after considering renewal periods, have an estimated useful life of 21 years and will be amortized over this period of time. The Company ~~has~~ recorded ~~$2.2~~$2.5 million of accumulated amortization expense as of ~~February 15,~~May 9, 2012 and $1.5 million of accumulated amortization expense as of August 31, 2011.

The Company recorded an intangible asset for goodwill in the amount of $0.2 million related to the acquisition of substantially all of the assets of Fuddruckers. Goodwill is considered to have an indefinite useful life and is not amortized. Goodwill was $0.2 million as of ~~February 15,~~May 9, 2012 and August 31, 2011.

Note 6. Impairment of Long-Lived Assets, Discontinued Operations and Property Held for Sale

The Company periodically evaluates long-lived assets held for use and held for sale whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of those assets may not be recoverable. The Company analyzes historical cash flows of operating locations and compares results of poorer performing locations to more profitable locations. The Company also analyzes lease terms, condition of the assets and related need for capital expenditures or repairs, as well as construction activity and the economic and market conditions in the surrounding area.

For assets held for use, the Company estimates future cash flows using assumptions based on possible outcomes of the areas analyzed. If the undiscounted future cash flows are less than the carrying value of the location’s assets, the Company records an impairment loss based on an estimate of discounted cash flows. The estimates of future cash flows, based on reasonable and supportable assumptions and projections, require management’s subjective judgments. Assumptions and estimates used include operating results, changes in working capital, discount rate, growth rate, anticipated net proceeds from disposition of the property and if applicable, lease terms. The span of time for which future cash flows are estimated is often lengthy, increasing the sensitivity to assumptions made. The time span could be 20 to 25 years for newer properties, but only 5 to 10 years for older properties. Depending on the assumptions and estimates used, the estimated future cash flows projected in the evaluation of long-lived assets can vary within a wide range of outcomes. The Company considers the likelihood of possible outcomes in determining the best estimate of future cash flows. The measurement for such an impairment loss is then based on the fair value of the asset as determined by discounted cash flows.

The Company recognized the following impairment charges ~~(credits)~~ to income from operations:


	Two Quarters ended					Three Quarters Ended
	February 15, 2012		February 9, 2011			May 9, 2012		May 4, 2011
	*(24 weeks)*		*(24 weeks)*			(36 weeks)		(36 weeks)
	*(In thousands, except per share data)*					*(In thousands, except per share data)*
Provision for asset impairments	$	175	$	84		$	175	$	84
Net (gain) loss on disposition of property and equipment		81		(28	)
Net loss on disposition of property and equipment							205		—

	$	256	$	56		$	380	$	84

Effect on EPS:
Basic	$	0.01	$	0.01		$	0.01		—
Assuming dilution	$	0.01	$	0.01		$	0.01		—

~~The net loss for the two quarters ended February 15, 2012 includes the results of normal asset retirements.~~ The impairment charge is related to a culinary contract services agreement. The net loss for the three quarters ended May 9, 2012 includes the results of normal asset retirements and the loss on disposals of assets at two closed locations.

The net ~~gain~~loss from normal asset retirement activity for the ~~two~~three quarters ended ~~February 9,~~May 4, 2011 ~~reflects the sale~~and net loss on disposal of ~~one previously~~equipment at two closed ~~restaurant property that~~units was ~~held for sale,~~ offset by ~~normal asset retirements. The impairment charge is related to~~the gain on a property ~~that was previously for sale but is now under development.~~sold in the first quarter of fiscal year 2011.

As a result of the first quarter fiscal year 2010 adoption of the Company’s Cash Flow Improvement and Capital Redeployment Plan (“the Plan”), the Company reclassified 23 stores to discontinued operations. The results of operations, assets and liabilities for all units included in the Plan have been reclassified to discontinued operations in the statement of operations and balance sheets for all periods presented.

The following table sets forth the assets and liabilities for all discontinued operations:


	February 15, 2012		August 31, 2011		May 9, 2012		August 31, 2011
	*(in thousands)*				*(in thousands)*
Trade accounts and other receivable, net	$	0	$	8	$	0	$	8
Prepaid expenses		54		59		37		59

Assets related to discontinued operations—current	$	54	$	67	$	37	$	67

Property and equipment	$	6,518	$	7,829	$	5,333	$	7,829
Other assets		8		8		8		8

Assets related to discontinued operations—non-current	$	6,526	$	7,837	$	5,341	$	7,837

Deferred income taxes	$	241	$	241	$	241	$	241
Accrued expenses and other liabilities		221		367		280		367

Liabilities related to discontinued operations—current	$	462	$	608	$	521	$	608

Other liabilities	$	601	$	565	$	632	$	565
Deferred income taxes		655		655		655		655

Liabilities related to discontinued operations—non-current	$	1,256	$	1,220	$	1,287	$	1,220

As of August 31, 2011, the Company had 12 properties classified as discontinued operations assets. The carrying value of the owned properties was $7.8 million. The carrying values of the ground leases were previously impaired to zero.

In the first quarter of fiscal year 2012, one property was impaired by $0.4 million and subsequently sold.

In the second quarter of fiscal year 2012, one property was impaired by $0.1 million.

In the third quarter of fiscal year 2012, one property was sold and no properties were impaired.

As of ~~February 15,~~May 9, 2012, the Company had 1110 properties classified as discontinued operations assets. The carrying value of the owned properties was ~~$6.5~~$5.3 million. The carrying values of the ground leases were previously impaired to zero.

The Company is actively marketing these properties for lease or sale and the Company’s results of discontinued operations will be affected by the disposal of properties related to discontinued operations to the extent proceeds from the sales exceed or are less than net book value.

The following table sets forth the sales and pretax income (losses) reported for discontinued operations:

~~The Company incurred no employee settlement costs in the first two quarters of fiscal years 2012 and 2011, respectively.~~

The following table summarizes discontinued operations for the first ~~two~~three quarters of fiscal years 2012 and 2011:


	Two Quarters ended						Three Quarters Ended
	February 15, 2012			February 9, 2011			May 9, 2012			May 4, 2011
	*(24 weeks)*			*(24 weeks)*			(36 weeks)			(36 weeks)
	*(In thousands, except per share data)*						*(In thousands, except per share data)*
Impairments	$	(510	)	$	(383	)	$	(510	)	$	(508	)
Gains (losses)		(12	)		2,144			(17	)		2,093

Net gains (losses)		(522	)		1,761			(527	)		1,585
Other		(134	)		(960	)		(215	)		(1,153	)

Discontinued operations	$	(656	)	$	801		$	(742	)	$	432

Effect on EPS from discontinued operations—basic	$	(0.02	)	$	0.03		$	(0.03	)	$	0.01

Within discontinued operations, the Company offsets gains from applicable property disposals against total impairments. The amounts in the table described as “Other” include employment termination and shut-down costs, as well as operating losses through each restaurant’s closing date and carrying costs until the locations are finally ~~disposed.~~disposed of.

The impairment charges included above relate to properties closed and designated for immediate disposal. The assets of these individual operating units have been written down to their net realizable values. In turn, the related properties have either been sold or are being actively marketed for sale. All dispositions are expected to be completed within one to three years. Within discontinued operations, the Company also recorded the related fiscal year-to-date net operating results, employee terminations and ~~basic~~ carrying costs of the closed units.

The Company periodically reviews long-lived assets against its plans to retain or ultimately dispose of properties. If the Company decides to dispose of a property, it will be moved to property held for sale and actively marketed. The Company analyzes market conditions each reporting period and records additional impairments due to declines in market values of like assets. The fair value of the property is determined by observable inputs such as appraisals and prices of comparable properties in active markets for assets like the Company’s. Gains are not recognized until the properties are sold.

Property held for sale includes unimproved land, closed restaurant properties and related equipment for locations not classified as discontinued operations. The specific assets are valued at the lower of net depreciable value or net realizable value.

At ~~February 15,~~May 9, 2012, the Company had one owned property recorded at approximately $0.6 million in property held for sale. At August 31, 2011, the Company had two owned properties recorded at approximately $1.0 million in property held for sale. The Company is actively marketing the location currently classified as property held for sale.

The Company sold one property held for sale during the ~~two~~three quarters ended ~~February 15,~~May 9, 2012 resulting in no gain or loss.

The Company’s results of continuing operations will be affected to the extent proceeds from sales exceed or are less than net book value.

From time to time, the Company is subject to various private lawsuits, administrative proceedings and claims that arise in the ordinary course of its business. A number of these lawsuits, proceedings and claims may exist at any given time. These matters typically involve claims from guests, employees and others related to issues common to the restaurant industry. The Company currently believes that the final disposition of these types of lawsuits, proceedings and claims will not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or liquidity. It is possible, however, that the Company’s future results of operations for a particular quarter or fiscal year could be impacted by changes in circumstances relating to lawsuits, proceedings or claims.

From time to time, the Company enters into non-cancelable contracts for the construction of its new restaurants. This construction activity exposes the Company to the risks inherent in new construction, including but not limited to rising material prices, labor shortages, delays in getting required permits and inspections, adverse weather conditions, and injuries sustained by workers. The Company had no non-cancelable contracts as of ~~February 15,~~May 9, 2012.

Christopher J. Pappas, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, and Harris J. Pappas, director and former Chief Operating Officer of the Company, own two restaurant entities (the “Pappas entities”) that from time to time may provide services to the Company and its subsidiaries, as detailed in the Amended and Restated Master Sales Agreement ~~dated December 9, 2005~~effective November 16, 2011 among the Company and the Pappas entities.

Under the terms of the Amended and Restated Master Sales Agreement, the Pappas entities may provide specialized (customized) equipment fabrication and basic equipment maintenance, including stainless steel stoves, shelving, rolling carts, and chef tables. The total costs under the Amended and Restated Master Sales Agreement of custom-fabricated and refurbished equipment in the ~~two~~three quarters ended ~~February 15,~~May 9, 2012 and ~~February 9,~~May 4, 2011 were ~~$63,300~~$87,000 and ~~$22,700,~~$27,000, respectively. Services provided under this agreement are subject to review and approval by the Finance and Audit Committee of the Company’s Board of Directors.

In the third quarter of fiscal year 2004, Messrs. Pappas became partners in a limited partnership which purchased a retail strip center in Houston, Texas. Messrs. Pappas collectively own a 50% limited partnership interest and a 50% general partnership interest in the limited partnership. A third party company manages the center. One of the Company’s restaurants has rented and occupied space in that center since July 1969.

On November 22, 2006, the Company executed a new lease agreement in connection with the replacement and relocation of the existing restaurant with a new prototype restaurant in the retail strip center described above. The new restaurant opened in July 2008 and the new lease agreement provides for a primary term of approximately twelve years with two subsequent five-year options. The new lease also gives the landlord an option to buy out the agreement on or after the calendar year 2015 by paying the unamortized cost of the Company’s improvements. The Company is currently obligated to pay rent of $20.00 per square foot ($22.00 per square foot beginning January 2014) plus maintenance, taxes, and insurance during the primary term of the lease. Thereafter, the lease provides for increases in rent at set intervals. The new lease agreement was approved by the Finance and Audit Committee and full Board of Directors. The Company made payments of ~~$133,000~~$220,000 and ~~$175,000~~$263,000 in the ~~two~~three quarters ended ~~February 15,~~May 9, 2012 and ~~February 9,~~May 4, 2011, respectively.

Affiliated rents paid for this restaurant property lease represented ~~2.3%~~2.5% and ~~3.0%~~3.1% of total rents for continuing operations for the ~~two~~three quarters ended ~~February 15,~~May 9, 2012 and ~~February 9,~~May 4, 2011, respectively.


	Two Quarters Ended						Three Quarters Ended
	February 15, 2012			February 9, 2011			May 9, 2012			May 4, 2011
	*(24 weeks)*			*(24 weeks)*			*(36 weeks)*			*(36 weeks)*
	*(In thousands, except percentages)*						*(In thousands, except percentages)*
AFFILIATED COSTS INCURRED:
General and administrative expenses – professional and other costs	$	25		$	29
Capital expenditures – custom-fabricated and refurbished equipment and furnishings		63			23
General and administrative expenses—professional and other costs							$	38		$	42
Capital expenditures—custom-fabricated and refurbished equipment and furnishings								87			27
Other operating expenses and opening costs, including property leases		108			149			220			266

Total	$	196		$	201		$	345		$	335

RELATIVE TOTAL COMPANY COSTS:
General and administrative expenses	$	13,547		$	13,004		$	20,742		$	19,985
Capital expenditures		9,247			2,985			16,056			5,140
Other operating expenses and opening costs		33,737			35,182			51,183			52,434

Total	$	56,531		$	51,171		$	87,981		$	77,559

AFFILIATED COSTS INCURRED AS A PERCENTAGE OF RELATIVE TOTAL COMPANY COSTS		0.35	%		0.39	%		0.39	%		0.43	%

Pursuant to the terms of a Purchase Agreement dated March 9, 2001, entered into by and among the Company, Christopher J. Pappas and Harris J. Pappas, the Company agreed to submit three persons designated by Christopher J. Pappas and Harris J. Pappas as nominees for election at the 2002 Annual Meeting of Shareholders. Messrs. Pappas designated themselves and Frank Markantonis as their nominees for directors, all of whom were subsequently elected. Christopher J. Pappas and Harris J. Pappas are brothers and Frank Markantonis is an attorney whose principal client is Pappas Restaurants, Inc., an entity owned by Harris J. Pappas and Christopher J. Pappas.

Christopher J. Pappas is a member of the Advisory Board of Amegy Bank, National Association, which is a lender and syndication agent under the Company’s revolving credit facility.

In November 2005, Christopher Pappas entered into a new employment agreement that was subsequently amended in April 2011 to extend the termination date thereof to August 2012. Mr. Pappas continues to devote his primary time and business efforts to the Company while maintaining his role at Pappas Restaurants, Inc.

On December 20, 2011, the Board of Directors of the Company approved the renewal of a consultant agreement with Ernest Pekmezaris, the Company’s former Chief Financial Officer. Under the agreement, Mr. Pekmezaris will continue to furnish to the Company advisory and consulting services related to finance and accounting matters and other related consulting services. The agreement was renewed for twelve months at the same monthly rate, expiring on January 31, 2013. Mr. Pekmezaris is also the Treasurer of Pappas Restaurants, Inc. Compensation for the services provided by Mr. Pekmezaris to Pappas Restaurants, Inc. is paid entirely by that entity.

On April 20, 2011, Harris Pappas retired as Chief Operating Officer of the Company but continues to serve as a member of the Company’s Board of Directors. In addition, pursuant to the Company’s plan of succession, the Board of Directors appointed Peter Tropoli as Chief Operating Officer of the Company. Mr. Tropoli formerly served as Senior Vice President, Administration, General Counsel and Secretary of the Company. In the past, Mr. Tropoli provided litigation services to entities controlled by Christopher J. Pappas and Harris J. Pappas. Mr. Tropoli is the stepson of Frank Markantonis, who is a director of the Company.

Paulette Gerukos, Vice President of Human Resources of the Company, is the sister-in-law of Harris J. Pappas, who is a director of the Company and the former Chief Operating Officer.

The Company has an Incentive Stock Plan for officers and employees (“Employee Stock ~~Plans”~~Plan”) and a Non-employee Director Stock Option Plan for non-employee directors. These plans authorize the granting of stock options, restricted stock and other types of awards consistent with the purpose of the plans. Approximately 2.9 million shares were authorized for issuance under the Company’s plans as of ~~February 15,~~May 9, 2012, of which approximately 1.2 million shares were available for future issuance. Stock options granted under the Incentive Stock Plan and the Non-employee Director Stock Option Plan have an exercise price equal to the market price of the Company’s common stock at the date of grant. Option awards under the Employee Stock ~~Plans~~Plan generally vest 25% each year on the anniversary of the grant date and expire six to ten years from the grant date. Option awards under the Non-employee Director Stock Option Plan generally vest 100% on the first anniversary of the grant date and expire ten years from the grant date.

A summary of the Company’s stock option activity for the ~~two~~three quarters ended ~~February 15,~~May 9, 2012 is presented below:


	Shares Under Fixed Options			Weighted-Average Exercise Price		Weighted-Average Remaining Contractual Term		Aggregate Intrinsic Value		Shares Under Fixed Options			Weighted-Average Exercise Price		Weighted-Average Remaining Contractual Term		Aggregate Intrinsic Value
						*(Years)*		*(In thousands)*							*(Years)*		*(In thousands)*
Outstanding at August 31, 2011		1,371,926		$	7.33		3.9	$	375		1,371,926		$	7.33		3.9	$	375
Granted		59,426			4.42		9.7		—		59,426			4.42		7.5		—
Exercised		0			—		—		—		—			—		—		—
Forfeited or Expired		(256,128	)		11.36		—		—		(256,128	)		11.36		—		—

Outstanding at February 15, 2012		1,175,224		$	6.31		4.3	$	579
Outstanding at May 9, 2012											1,175,224		$	6.31		4.1	$	1,240

Exercisable at February 15, 2012		803,607		$	7.17		3.4	$	292
Exercisable at May 9, 2012											806,133		$	7.16		3.2	$	647

The Company issues restricted stock awards of the Company’s common stock to nonemployee directors in lieu of cash payments for director fees. These restricted stock awards vest when granted, but are issued with a restriction that the stock ~~can not~~cannot be sold or transferred. The restriction is removed three years from its issuance or upon termination of the director. Restricted stock awards are valued at the average of the high and low market price of the Company’s common stock at the date of grant and expense is recognized on the date of the grant. The Company issued approximately ~~26,000~~34,000 restricted stock awards in the ~~two~~three quarters ended ~~February 15,~~May 9, 2012.

The Company also issues restricted stock units under the Non-employee Director Stock Option plan and the Employee Stock Plan. Restricted stock units also consist of the Company’s common stock and vest after three years. All restricted stock units are cliff-vested. Restricted stock units are also valued at the average of the high and low market price of the Company’s common stock at the date of grant. However, expense is recognized each quarter over the three year vesting period.

A summary of the Company’s activity related to restricted stock units for the ~~two~~three quarters ended ~~February 15,~~May 9, 2012 is presented in the following table:

Basic net income per share is computed by dividing net income available to common shareholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding and unvested restricted stock for the reporting period. Diluted net income per share reflects the potential dilution that could occur if securities or other contracts to issue common stock were exercised or converted into common stock. For the calculation of diluted net income per share, the basic weighted average number of shares is increased by the dilutive effect of stock options determined using the treasury stock method. Stock options ~~with exercise prices exceeding current market prices that were~~

excluded from the ~~computations~~computation of net income per share ~~amounted to approximately 765,000 shares~~ for the ~~two~~

three quarters ended ~~February 15, 2012.~~May 9, 2012 include approximately 373,000 shares with exercise prices exceeding market prices and approximately 17,000 shares whose inclusion would also be antidilutive. Due to losses from continuing operations for the ~~first quarter and two~~three quarters ended ~~February 9,~~May 4, 2011, the denominator for earnings per share assuming dilution is equal to the denominator for basic earnings per share.


	Quarter Ended						Two Quarters Ended						Quarter Ended						Three Quarters Ended
	February 15, 2012			February 9, 2011			February 15, 2012			February 9, 2011			May 9, 2012			May 4, 2011			May 9, 2012			May 4, 2011
	*(12 weeks)*			*(12 weeks)*			*(24 weeks)*			*(24 weeks)*			*(12 weeks)*			*(12 weeks)*			*(36 weeks)*			*(36 weeks)*
	*(In thousands except share data)*												*(In thousands except per share data)*
Numerator:
Income (loss) from continuing operations	$	1,364		$	(264	)	$	1,947		$	(2,372	)	$	2,509		$	2,060		$	4,456		$	(313	)
Loss from discontinued operations		(276	)		981			(656	)		801
Income (loss) from discontinued operations														(86	)		(369	)		(742	)		432

Net income (loss)	$	1,088		$	717		$	1,291		$	(1,571	)
Net income													$	2,423		$	1,691		$	3,714		$	119

Denominator:
Denominator for basic earnings per share – weighted-average shares		28,365			28,172			28,329			28,168
Denominator for basic earnings per share—weighted-average shares														28,377			28,257			28,344			28,224
Effect of potentially dilutive securities:
Employee and non-employee stock options		45			0			30			0			68			47			52			—

Denominator for earnings per share assuming dilution		28,410			28,172			28,359			28,168			28,445			28,304			28,396			28,224

Income (loss) per share from continuing operations:
Basic	$	0.05		$	(0.01	)	$	0.07		$	(0.09	)	$	0.09		$	0.07		$	0.16		$	(0.01	)
Assuming dilution	$	0.05		$	(0.01	)	$	0.07		$	(0.09	)	$	0.09		$	0.07		$	0.16		$	(0.01	)
											��
Loss per share from discontinued operations:
Income (loss) per share from discontinued operations:
Basic	$	(0.01	)	$	0.04		$	(0.02	)	$	0.03		$	—		$	(0.01	)	$	(0.03	)	$	0.01
Assuming dilution	$	(0.01	)	$	0.04		$	(0.02	)	$	0.03		$	—		$	(0.01	)	$	(0.03	)	$	0.01

Net income (loss) per share:
Basic	$	0.04		$	0.03		$	0.05		$	(0.06	)	$	0.09		$	0.06		$	0.13		$	—
Assuming dilution	$	0.04		$	0.03		$	0.05		$	(0.06	)	$	0.09		$	0.06		$	0.13		$	—

In July 2010, the FASB issued ASU No. 2010-20, Receivables (Topic 310), which provides guidance to enhance disclosures about the credit quality of a creditor’s financing receivables and the adequacy of its allowance for credit loses. The guidance became effective as of November 23, 2011 and its implementation had no material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In December 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-29, Business Combinations (Topic 805): Disclosure of supplemental pro forma information for business combinations. The guidance is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2010 and the Company adopted ASU 2010-29 in the first quarter of fiscal year 2012 without a material impact on ~~our~~its consolidated financial statements.

In December 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-28, Intangibles – Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): When to perform step two of the goodwill impairment test for reporting units with zero or negative carrying amounts. The guidance is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2010. The Company adopted the guidance in the first quarter of fiscal year 2012 and the guidance did not have a material impact on ~~our~~its consolidated financial statements.

In September 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-08, Intangibles—Goodwill and Other (Topic 350), which simplifies how entities test goodwill for impairment and permits an entity to first assess qualitative factors to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount as a basis for determining whether it is necessary to perform the two-step goodwill impairment test. The guidance is effective for annual and interim goodwill impairment tests performed for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2011. However, the Company early adopted the guidance for fiscal year 2011 and implementation did not have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with the unaudited consolidated financial statements and footnotes for the period ended ~~February 15,~~May 9, 2012 included in Item 1 of Part I of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, and the audited consolidated financial statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended August 31, 2011.

The following presents an analysis of the results and financial condition of our continuing operations. Except where indicated otherwise, the results of discontinued operations are excluded from this discussion.

Luby’s, Inc. is a multi-branded company operating in the restaurant industry and the contract food services industry. Our primary brands include Luby’s Cafeterias, Luby’s Culinary Contract Services and Fuddruckers. Also included in our brands are Bob Luby’s Seafood, Luby’s, Etc. and Koo Koo Roo Chicken Bistro. We purchased substantially all of the assets of Fuddruckers, Inc., Magic Brands, LLC and certain of their affiliates (collectively, “Fuddruckers”) in July 2010; accordingly, the quarter ended November 17, 2010 was the first full fiscal quarter in which the operations of Fuddruckers branded restaurants were included in our results of operations.

As of ~~February 15,~~May 9, 2012, we owned and operated ~~153~~154 restaurants, including 92 traditional cafeterias, 5758 gourmet hamburger restaurants, 3 upscale fast serve chicken restaurants, and 1 seafood restaurant. These establishments are located in close proximity to retail centers, business developments and residential areas mostly throughout the United States.

Also as of ~~February 15,~~May 9, 2012, we operated 1918 culinary contract service facilities. These facilities are located within healthcare and education settings in Texas and Louisiana. These facilities provide food service options to varied populations including in-hospital-room patient meal service, retail food-court style restaurant dining, and coffee/snack kiosks.

Also as of ~~February 15,~~May 9, 2012, we are a franchisor for a network of ~~122~~124 Fuddruckers restaurants. The owners of these franchise units pay royalty revenue to us as a franchisor.

Our fiscal year ends on the last Wednesday in August. As such, each fiscal year normally consists of 13 four-week periods, or accounting periods, accounting for 364 days in the aggregate. Each of the first three quarters of each fiscal year consists of three four-week periods, while the fourth quarter normally consists of four four-week periods. Comparability between quarters may be affected by varying lengths of the quarters, as well as the seasonality associated with the restaurant business.

The restaurant business is highly competitive with respect to food quality, concept, location, price, and service, all of which may have an effect on same-store sales. Our same-store sales calculation measures the relative performance of a certain group of restaurants. To qualify for inclusion in this group, a store must have been in operation for 18 consecutive accounting periods. Our Fuddruckers units ~~will be~~were included in this measurement beginning with our fiscal third quarter of 2012. Stores that close on a permanent basis are removed from the group in the fiscal quarter when operations cease at the restaurant, but remain in the same-store group for previously reported fiscal quarters. Although management believes this approach leads to more effective year-over-year comparisons, neither the time frame nor the exact practice may be similar to those used by other restaurant companies.

For the ~~Second~~Third Quarter and Year-to-Date Fiscal Year 2012 versus the ~~Second~~Third Quarter and Year-to-Date Fiscal Year 2011

Total sales increased ~~$2.9~~$0.7 million, or ~~3.8%,~~0.9 %, in the quarter ended ~~February 15,~~May 9, 2012 compared to the quarter ended ~~February 9,~~May 4, 2011, ~~consisting~~ primarily ~~of a $1.7~~due to an increase in culinary contract sales. The $0.1 million ~~increase~~decrease in restaurant sales ~~and~~included a $1.2 million decrease in sales at our Luby’s Cafeteria restaurants offset by a $1.1 million increase in ~~culinary contract services sales. The $1.7 million increase in restaurant sales included a $0.3 million increase in sales at Luby’s Cafeteria-branded restaurants and a $1.3 million increase in~~ sales from ~~Fuddruckers-branded~~our Fuddruckers restaurants in the quarter ended ~~February 15,~~May 9, 2012. The ~~$1.1~~$0.8 million increase in culinary contract services sales resulted primarily from larger sales volume facilities replacing smaller facilities where contracts ended as well as growth in sales volume at facilities that have been in operation for more than one year. ~~While~~On a same store basis, restaurant sales increased 1.1% in the quarter ended May 9, 2012 compared to the quarter ended May 4, 2011. Luby’s Cafeterias included in the same-store metric increased 0.1% and Fuddruckers restaurants included in the same-store metric increased 4.6%. The fiscal quarter ended May 9, 2012 was the first fiscal quarter in which the Fuddruckers ~~units do not meet~~and Koo Koo Roo restaurants were included in our ~~current definition of same-stores, total~~same store sales ~~at stores that we acquired and have operated for over one year increased 6.8%.~~calculation.

Total sales increased approximately ~~$6.9~~$7.7 million, or ~~4.6%~~3.3%, in the ~~two~~three quarters ended ~~February 15,~~May 9, 2012 compared to the ~~two~~three quarters ended ~~February 9,~~May 4, 2011, consisting of a ~~$4.5~~$4.4 million increase in restaurant sales, ~~$0.1~~a $0.2 million increase in Fuddruckers franchise revenue, and a ~~$2.3~~$3.1 million increase in culinary contract services sales. The ~~$4.5~~$4.4 million increase in restaurant sales included a ~~$1.9~~$0.6 million increase in sales at our Luby’s ~~Cafeteria-branded~~Cafeteria restaurants and ~~$2.7~~a $3.8 million increase in sales from ~~Fuddruckers-branded~~our Fuddruckers and Koo Koo Roo restaurants in the ~~two~~three quarters ended ~~February~~May 9, ~~2011.~~2012. On a same-store basis, restaurant sales atincreased 2.1% during the ~~Luby’s Cafeteria restaurants increased 2.8% during the~~

~~two~~three quarters ended ~~February 15,~~May 9, 2012 compared to the ~~two~~three quarters ended ~~February~~May 4, 2011. The Luby’s Cafeteria-branded restaurants were included in the same store sales definition for each of the three quarters ended May 9, ~~2011.~~2012, but the Fuddruckers restaurants only met the definition in the quarter ended May 9, 2012. The improved same-store sales was primarily due to improving economic conditions, ~~and~~ our focus on various marketing media avenues, complemented with continued momentum with local restaurant marketing efforts, as well as customer acceptance of our remodeling initiatives at select restaurants and ~~limited time offers used to generate customer traffic~~a rebuild at ~~the Luby’s Cafeteria restaurant units.~~one location.

Food costs decreased ~~$1.0~~$0.6 million, or ~~3.0%~~2.9%, in the quarter ended ~~February 15,~~May 9, 2012 compared to the quarter ended ~~February 9,~~May 4, 2011, due primarily to careful food cost management, ~~and~~ menu mix management, ~~partially offset by higher~~and moderating food commodity prices, ~~on a year-over-year basis,~~ particularly ~~with respect to~~in the area of beef and ~~shortening and oils.~~seafood. As a percentage of restaurant sales, food costs decreased ~~1.5%~~0.8%, to ~~28.3%~~27.4%, in the quarter ended ~~February 15,~~May 9, 2012 compared to ~~29.8%~~28.2% in the quarter ended ~~February 9,~~May 4, 2011. Food costs as a percentage of sales also decreased due to a higher average spend per customer as a result of modest menu price increases taken at both of our core restaurant brands prior to the quarter ended ~~February 15,~~May 9, 2012 and a reduction in the frequency and breadth of discounted limited time offers at our Luby’s Cafeteria restaurants used to generate customer traffic.

Food costs decreased approximately ~~$1.0~~$1.6 million, or ~~2.4%~~2.5%, in the ~~two~~three quarters ended ~~February 15,~~May 9, 2012 compared to the ~~two~~three quarters ended ~~February 9,~~May 4, 2011. As a percentage of restaurant sales, food costs decreased ~~1.6%~~1.3%, to ~~28.1%~~27.9% in the ~~two~~three quarters ended ~~February 15,~~May 9, 2012 compared to ~~29.7%~~29.2% in the ~~two~~three quarters ended ~~February 9,~~May 4, 2011, primarily due to a higher average spend per customer as a result of modest menu price increases taken at both of our core restaurant brands prior to the quarter ended ~~February 15,~~May 9, 2012 and a reduction in the frequency and breadth of discounted limited time offers at our Luby’s Cafeteria restaurants used to generate customer traffic.

Payroll and related costs ~~increased $0.2~~decreased $0.6 million in the quarter ended ~~February 15,~~May 9, 2012 compared to the quarter ended ~~February 9,~~May 4, 2011. Hourly labor costs decreased significantly as we improved productivity from further refinement of our labor scheduling processes, with particular emphasis on shift ~~scheduling.~~scheduling and increased flexibility to adjust daily to changing customer traffic. The quarter ended ~~February 9,~~May 4, 2011 was a period of increased guest traffic generated from ~~extensive~~significant use of limited time offers. The higher guest traffic in the prior year required deployment of more hourly crew members. Management labor costs increased in the quarter ended ~~February 15,~~May 9, 2012 compared to the quarter ended ~~February 9,~~May 4, 2011 as we deployed more restaurant management personnel into our units to support sales building initiatives. As a percentage of restaurant sales, payroll and related costs decreased ~~0.5%~~0.6%, to ~~34.6%~~33.0%, in the quarter ended ~~February 15,~~May 9, 2012 compared to ~~35.1%~~33.6% in the quarter ended ~~February 9,~~May 4, 2011, due in part to leveraging our labor costs on a higher volume of sales.

Payroll and related costs ~~increased~~decreased approximately $0.3 million in the ~~two~~three quarters ended ~~February 15,~~May 9, 2012 compared to the ~~two~~three quarters ended ~~February 9,~~May 4, 2011, due to ~~higher management~~lower hourly labor costs ~~partially~~ offset by ~~lower hourly~~higher management labor costs. Management labor costs increased as we deployed more restaurant management personnel into our units at a higher average salary in our efforts to support sales building initiatives. Hourly labor costs decreased as we improved productivity from further refinement of our labor scheduling processes, with particular emphasis on shift ~~scheduling.~~scheduling and increased flexibility to adjust daily to changing customer traffic. The ~~two~~three quarters ended ~~February 9,~~May 4, 2011 were also a period of increased guest traffic generated from extensive use of limited time offers. The higher guest traffic in the prior year quarters required deployment of more hourly crew members. As a percentage of restaurant sales, ~~these~~payroll and related costs decreased ~~0.9%~~0.8%, to ~~34.4%~~33.9%, in the ~~two~~three quarters ended ~~February 15,~~May 9, 2012 compared to ~~35.3%~~34.7% in the ~~two~~three quarters ended ~~February 9,~~May 4, 2011, due in part to leveraging our labor costs on a higher volume of sales.

Other operating expenses primarily include restaurant-related expenses for utilities, repairs and maintenance, advertising, insurance, restaurant services, restaurant supplies and occupancy costs. Other operating expenses ~~decreased~~increased by ~~$0.7~~$0.2 million, or ~~4.1%~~1.1%, for the quarter ended ~~February 15,~~May 9, 2012 compared to the quarter ended February 9, 2011, primarily due to (1) a ~~$0.4~~$0.2 million ~~reduction~~increase in ~~repairs~~marketing and ~~maintenance expenses;~~advertising expense; (2) a ~~$0.2~~$0.1 million ~~reduction~~increase in utility costs; ~~and (3) a $0.2 million reduction in insurance costs;~~ offset by ~~(4)~~(3) a $0.1 million net ~~increase~~reduction in restaurant services, supplies, ~~and services, marketing and advertising,~~ occupancy costs, insurance costs, and other operating ~~costs.~~expenses in the aggregate. As a percentage of restaurant sales, other operating expenses ~~decreased 1.5%~~increased 0.2%, to ~~22.0%~~22.3%, in the quarter ended ~~February 15,~~May 9, 2012 compared to ~~23.5%~~22.1% in the quarter ended ~~February 9,~~May 4, 2011, due to the cost reductions enumerated above as well as the ability to leverage the fixed cost components of certain operating costs over an increased sales volume.

Other operating expenses decreased by approximately ~~$1.4~~$1.2 million, or ~~3.9%~~2.3%, in the ~~two~~three quarters ended ~~February 15,~~May 9, 2012 compared to the ~~two~~three quarters ended ~~February 9,~~May 4, 2011, primarily due to (1) a $0.3 million reduction in ~~all cost categories: (1)~~ utilities ~~cost decreased approximately $0.4 million~~expense on lower usage and electric utility rates; (2) a reduction of $0.5 million in repairs and maintenance costs ~~decreased approximately $0.3 million~~ in part due to some post-Fuddruckers acquisition costs in the prior year not recurring in the current year; (3) a $0.3 million reduction in insurance ~~cost decreased approximately $0.3 million;~~costs; and (4) a net $0.1 million reduction restaurant services and supplies, occupancy, marketing and advertising ~~costs, restaurant supplies~~expenses, and ~~services, and occupancy costs decreased approximately $0.4 million in the aggregate.~~other operating expenses.

Opening costs include labor, supplies, occupancy, and other costs necessary to support the restaurant through its opening period. Opening costs were ~~$42~~$33 thousand in the quarter ended ~~February 15,~~May 9, 2012 compared to ~~$38~~$34 thousand in the quarter ended ~~February 9,~~May 4, 2011. The quarter ended ~~February 15,~~May 9, 2012 and the quarter ended ~~February 9,~~May 4, 2011 included carrying costs of locations to be developed for future restaurant openings.

Opening costs were approximately ~~$77~~$110 thousand in the ~~two~~three quarters ended ~~February 15,~~May 9, 2012 compared to approximately ~~$144~~$178 thousand in the ~~two~~three quarters ended ~~February 9,~~May 4, 2011. Opening costs in the ~~two~~three quarters ended ~~February 15,~~May 9, 2012 and the ~~two~~three quarters ended ~~February 9,~~May 4, 2011 included the carrying costs of locations to be developed for future restaurant openings. The ~~two~~three quarters ended ~~February 9,~~May 4, 2011 also included the opening costs for one Company-operated unit that was previously operated as a franchisee unit, and the support costs associated with franchisees opening two units.

~~During the quarter ended February 15,~~At May 9, 2012 and May 4, 2011, culinary contract services operated ~~19 facilities, the same as during the quarter ended February 9, 2011.~~18 facilities. Cost of culinary contract services includes the food, labor, and other direct operating expenses associated with generating culinary contract services revenue. Cost of culinary contract services increased ~~$1.3~~$0.7 million in the quarter ended ~~February 15,~~May 9, 2012 compared to the quarter ended May 4, 2011 and ~~$2.4~~$3.0 million in the ~~two~~three quarters ended ~~February~~May 9, 2012 compared to the three quarters ended May 4, 2011. The increases reflect the higher costs associated with operating at some larger volume facilities, and the growth in volume at certain facilities that have been operating for the whole year. Also included in the cost of culinary contract services for the three quarters ended May 9, 2012 is a provision for possible uncollectible amounts at ~~one facility.~~two facilities.

Depreciation and amortization expense increased ~~$0.2~~$0.4 million to ~~$4.1~~$4.3 million in the quarter ended ~~February 15,~~May 9, 2012 compared to the quarter ended ~~February 9,~~May 4, 2011 as new assets were placed in service from remodel activity and ~~from~~due to the shortening of the depreciable life of assets in a few leased units.

Depreciation and amortization expense increased by approximately ~~$0.1~~$0.5 million, or ~~1.2%~~4.5%, in the ~~two~~three quarters ended ~~February 15,~~May 9, 2012 compared to the ~~two~~three quarters ended ~~February 9,~~May 4, 2011 as new assets were placed in service due to remodel activity and ~~from~~due to the shortening of the depreciable life of assets in a few leased units, offset by certain assets reaching the end of their depreciable lives.

General and administrative expenses include corporate salaries and benefits-related costs, including restaurant area leaders, share-based compensation, professional fees, travel and recruiting expenses and other office expenses. General and administrative expenses increased by $0.2 million, or ~~3.8%~~3.1%, in the quarter ended ~~February 15,~~May 9, 2012 compared to the quarter ended ~~February 9,~~May 4, 2011. The increase was primarily due to higher salary and benefits expenses. As a percentage of total sales, general and administrative expenses ~~was 8.5%~~increased 0.2% to 8.6% in the quarter ended ~~February 15,~~May 9, 2012 ~~and~~from 8.4% in the quarter ended ~~February 9,~~May 4, 2011.

General and administrative expenses increased by approximately ~~$0.5~~$0.8 million, or ~~4.2%~~3.8%, in the ~~two~~three quarters ended ~~February 15,~~May 9, 2012 compared to the ~~two~~three quarters ended ~~February 9,~~May 4, 2011. The increase was primarily due to higher salary and benefits expense. ~~As a percentage~~General and administrative expenses were 8.5% of total sales ~~general and administrative expenses was 8.5%~~ in the ~~two~~three quarters ended ~~February 15,~~May 9, 2012 and ~~8.6%~~ in the ~~two~~three quarters ended ~~February 9,~~May 4, 2011.

There were no asset impairment charges in the quarter ended May 9, 2012 or in the quarter ended May 4, 2011.

An impairment charge of $175 thousand for the ~~two~~three quarters ended ~~February 15,~~May 9, 2012 ~~was~~ related to one culinary contract services location.

~~An impairment charge~~Impairment charges of $84 thousand infor the ~~quarter~~three quarters ended ~~February 9,~~May 4, 2011 related to a reduction to net realizable value for one property previously classified as property held for sale that is now under development.

The net loss on disposition of property and equipment in the quarter ended ~~February 15,~~May 9, 2012 of ~~$72~~$124 thousand reflects normal asset retirement activity and the loss on disposal of equipment at one closed Fuddruckers unit. The net loss on dispositions of property and equipment in the quarter ended May 4, 2011, of $28 thousand reflects normal asset retirement activity.

The net loss on disposition of property and equipment was approximately $205 thousand in the three quarters ended May 9, 2012 and primarily reflects normal asset retirement activity and loss on disposal of equipment of two closed units.

~~The~~For the three quarters ended May 4, 2011, the net loss ~~on disposition of property and equipment was approximately $81 thousand in the two quarters ended February 15, 2012 and reflects~~from normal asset retirement activity and net loss on disposal of equipment ofat two closed ~~units.~~

~~The net~~units was exactly offset by the gain ~~on dispositions of property and equipment for the two quarters ended February 9, 2011 of approximately $28 thousand included normal asset retirement activity and a gain of $35 thousand~~ on a property sold in the first quarter of fiscal year 2011.

Interest income was ~~comparable~~$3 thousand in the quarter ended ~~February 15,~~May 9, 2012 and less than $1 thousand in the quarter ended ~~February 9,~~May 4, 2011.

Interest income was ~~comparable~~$6 thousand in the ~~two~~three quarters ended ~~February 15,~~May 9, 2012 and $4 thousand in the ~~two~~three quarters ended ~~February 9,~~May 4, 2011, primarily related to ~~lower~~marginally higher average cash ~~and cash equivalents.~~balances.

Interest expense in the quarter ended ~~February 15,~~May 9, 2012 decreased ~~$0.3~~$0.4 million compared to the interest expense in the quarter ended ~~February 9,~~May 4, 2011, due to lower outstanding debt balances resulting from the application of cash from operations and property sales to our debt balance.

Interest expense in the ~~two~~three quarters ended ~~February 15,~~May 9, 2012 decreased approximately ~~$0.7~~$1.1 million compared to the ~~two~~three quarters ended ~~February 9,~~May 4, 2011, due to lower outstanding debt balances resulting from the application of cash from operations and property sales to our debt balance.

Other income, net consists primarily of the following components: net rental property income and expenses relating to property for which we are the landlord; prepaid sales tax discounts earned through our participation in state tax prepayment programs; and oil and gas royalty income. Other income, net decreased $0.1 million in the quarter ended ~~February 15,~~May 9, 2012 compared to the quarter ended ~~February 9,~~May 4, 2011.

Other income, net decreased ~~$0.1~~$0.2 million in the ~~two~~three quarters ended ~~February 15,~~May 9, 2012 compared to the ~~two~~three quarters ended ~~February 9,~~May 4, 2011.

For the quarter ended ~~February 15,~~May 9, 2012, the income taxes related to continuing operations resulted in a tax provision of ~~$0.6~~$1.5 million compared to a net tax ~~benefit~~provision of ~~$0.3~~$1.4 million for the quarter ended ~~February 9,~~May 4, 2011. For the quarter ended ~~February 15,~~May 9, 2012, there was no change to the valuation allowance related to deferred tax assets. For the quarter ended ~~February 9,~~May 4, 2011, there was no change to the valuation allowance. Income tax benefits from employment tax credits, and adjusting these to tax return filings, resulted in a higher effective tax rate for the quarter ended May 4, 2011 relative to the quarter ended May 9, 2012.

For the ~~two~~three quarters ended ~~February 15,~~May 9, 2012, the income taxes related to continuing operations resulted in a net tax provision of ~~$0.9~~$2.5 million compared to a ~~net~~ tax ~~benefit~~provision of ~~$1.2~~$0.2 million for the ~~two~~three quarters ended ~~February 9,~~May 4, 2011. For the ~~two~~three quarters ended ~~February 15,~~May 9, 2012, there was no change to the valuation allowance related to deferred tax assets. For the ~~two~~three quarters ended ~~February 9,~~May 4, 2011, ~~there was no change to~~ the valuation allowance related to deferred taxes increased by $0.1 million and resulted in a higher effective tax ~~assets.~~rate for the three quarters ended May 4, 2011 relative to the three quarters ended May 9, 2012.

The loss from discontinued operations was ~~$0.3~~$0.1 million in the quarter ended ~~February 15,~~May 9, 2012 compared to ~~income~~a loss of ~~$1.0~~$0.4 million in the quarter ended ~~February 9,~~May 4, 2011. The loss for the quarter ended ~~February 15,~~May 9, 2012 included (1) $0.2 million in carrying costs associated with assets that ~~are~~were related to discontinued ~~operations and~~operations; offset by (2) ~~an impairment charge of~~a net $0.1 ~~million.~~million income tax benefit related to discontinued operations.

The ~~income~~loss in the quarter ended ~~February 9,~~May 4, 2011 included ~~$1.9~~(1) $0.1 million in ~~gains~~losses on sales of assets that were classified as discontinued ~~operations assets, offset by (1)~~operation assets; (2) $0.3 million in carrying costs associated with assets that ~~are classified as discontinued operations assets; (2) a $0.2 million impairment charge for assets that are~~were classified as discontinued operations assets; and (3) $0.1 million impairment charge for assets that were classified as discontinued operations assets; offset by (4) a net ~~$0.4~~$0.1 million income tax ~~provision~~benefit related to discontinued operations.

The loss from discontinued operations was $0.7 million in the ~~two~~three quarters ended ~~February 15,~~May 9, 2012 compared to income of ~~$0.8~~$0.4 million in the ~~two~~three quarters ended ~~February 9,~~May 4, 2011. The loss for the ~~two~~three quarters ended ~~February 15,~~May 9, 2012 included (1) ~~$0.4~~$0.6 million in carrying costs associated with assets that ~~are~~were classified as discontinued operations assets; and (2) a $0.5 million impairment charge for assets that ~~are~~were classified as discontinued operations assets; ~~and~~offset by (3) a net ~~$0.2~~$0.4 million income tax benefit related to discontinued operations.

The income of ~~$0.8~~$0.4 million in the ~~two~~three quarters ended ~~February 9,~~May 4, 2011 included $2.1 million in gains on sales of assets classified as discontinued operations assets, offset by (1) ~~$0.6~~$1.0 million in carrying costs associated with assets that ~~are~~were classified as discontinued operations assets; (2) a ~~$0.4~~$0.5 million impairment charge for assets that ~~are~~were classified as discontinued operations assets; and (3) a net ~~$0.3~~$0.2 million income tax provision related to discontinued operations.

General. Our primary sources of short-term and long-term liquidity are cash flows from operations and our revolving credit facility. Cash flow from operations during the first ~~two~~three quarters of fiscal year 2012 was significantly improved over cash flow from operations during the first ~~two~~three quarters of fiscal year 2011. Due to the improved cash flow from operations, we increased our capital expenditures. Net cash provided by operating activities was ~~$10.1~~$20.7 million for the ~~two~~three quarters ended ~~February 15,~~May 9, 2012 compared to ~~$0.1~~$6.6 million for the ~~two~~three quarters ended ~~February 9,~~May 4, 2011. We plan to continue the level of capital and repair and maintenance expenditures necessary to keep our restaurants attractive and operating efficiently.

Cash from operations and proceeds from the sale of assets allowed for debt repayments and capital expenditures during the ~~two~~three quarters ended ~~February 15,~~May 9, 2012. Under the current terms of our revolving credit facility, as amended through October 20, 2011, capital expenditures and the amount of borrowings are limited based on our EBITDA, as defined in the credit agreement, as amended, governing the revolving credit facility. Based upon our level of past and projected capital requirements, we expect that proceeds from the sale of assets and cash flows from operations, combined with other financing alternatives in place or available, will be sufficient to meet our capital expenditures and working capital requirements during the next twelve months.

As is common in the restaurant industry, we maintain relatively low levels of accounts receivable and inventories and our vendors grant trade credit for purchases such as food and supplies. However, higher levels of accounts receivable are typical for culinary contract services and franchises. We also continually invest in our business through the addition of new units and refurbishment of existing units, which are reflected as long-term assets.

Cash provided by operating activities of ~~$10.1~~$20.7 million was offset by cash used in financing activities of ~~$8.1~~$7.0 million and cash used in investing activities of ~~$2.0~~$13.7 million during the ~~two~~three quarters ended ~~February 15,~~May 9, 2012.

The following table summarizes our cash flows from operating, investing and financing activities:


	Two Quarters ended						Three Quarters ended
	February 15, 2012			February 9, 2011			May 9, 2012			May 4, 2011
	*(24 weeks)*			*(24 weeks)*			*(36 weeks)*			*(36 weeks)*
	(In thousands)						*(In thousands)*
Total cash provided by (used in):
Operating activities	$	10,125		$	82		$	20,714		$	6,598
Investing activities		(8,128	)		4,291			(13,657	)		3,089
Financing activities		(2,001	)		(5,696	)		(7,001	)		(10,755	)

Decrease in cash and cash equivalents	$	(4	)	$	(1,323	)
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents							$	56		$	(1,068	)

Operating Activities. In the ~~two~~three quarters ended ~~February 15,~~May 9, 2012, cash provided by operating activities was ~~$10.1~~$20.7 million compared to ~~$0.1~~$6.6 million for the ~~two~~three quarters ended ~~February 9,~~May 4, 2011, an increase of ~~$10.0~~$14.1 million. Cash provided by operating activities before changes in operating assets and liabilities was ~~$11.2~~$19.5 million for the ~~two~~three quarters ended ~~February 15,~~May 9, 2012 compared to ~~$4.5~~$11.8 million for the ~~two~~three quarters ended ~~February 9,~~May 4, 2011, an increase of ~~$6.7~~$7.6 million. The ~~$6.7~~$7.6 million increase was primarily due to improved operating results from ~~the~~our Luby’s Cafeteria and Fuddruckers restaurants.

Changes in operating assets and liabilities was a net ~~use~~source of ~~$1.0~~$1.3 million in cash for the ~~two~~three quarters ended ~~February 15,~~May 9, 2012 compared to a net use of cash of ~~$4.3~~$5.2 million for the ~~two~~three quarters ended ~~February 9,~~May 4, 2011, a ~~$3.3~~$6.5 million ~~decrease.~~change. Cash provided by changes in operating assets and liabilities is the result of the net changes in asset and liability balances during the quarters. The ~~$3.3~~$6.5 million decrease in the use of cash during the ~~two~~three quarters ended ~~February 15,~~May 9, 2012 compared to the ~~two~~three quarters ended ~~February 9,~~May 4, 2011 was ~~primarily~~ due to a $2.6 million change in trade and other receivables, a $0.8 million change in prepayments, a $1.6 million change in the collection of rent incentives and a change in the timing of accruals and payments of payroll ~~property and sales~~of $3.0 million, offset by a $1.7 million reduction in accrued payables of taxes ~~($0.5 million, $2.5 million and $0.3 million, respectively) between the first two quarters of fiscal years 2012 and 2011.~~other than income taxes.

Investing Activities. We generally reinvest available cash flows from operations to develop new restaurants, enhance existing restaurants and support our culinary contract services business. Cash used by investing activities was ~~$8.1~~$13.7 million in the ~~two~~three quarters ended ~~February 15,~~May 9, 2012 compared to cash provided by investing activities of ~~$4.3~~$3.1 million in the ~~two~~three quarters ended ~~February 9,~~May 4, 2011. In the first quarter of fiscal year 2011, we acquired one franchised location for $0.3 million. Proceeds from property sales were ~~$7.5~~$8.5 million in the ~~two~~three quarters ended ~~February 9,~~May 4, 2011 and ~~$1.3~~$2.6 million in the ~~two~~three quarters ended ~~February 15,~~May 9, 2012. We increased our purchases of equipment and new restaurant construction from ~~$3.0~~$5.1 million in the ~~two~~three quarters ended ~~February 9,~~May 4, 2011 to ~~$9.2~~$16.1 million in the ~~two~~three quarters ended ~~February 15,~~May 9, 2012. Our capital expenditure program includes, among other things, investments in new restaurant and culinary contract services locations, restaurant remodeling, ~~and~~ information technology ~~enhancements.~~enhancements and purchase of property for development.

Financing Activities.Cash used in financing activities was ~~$2.0~~$7.0 million during the ~~two~~three quarters ended ~~February 15,~~May 9, 2012, primarily due to reducing our debt from $21.5 million at August 31, 2011 to ~~$19.5~~$14.5 million at ~~February 15,~~May 9, 2012. Cash used in financing activities was ~~$5.7~~$10.8 million in the ~~two~~three quarters ended ~~February 9,~~May 4, 2011, primarily due to reducing our debt from $41.5 million at August 25, 2010 to ~~$36.0~~$31.0 million at ~~February 9,~~May 4, 2011.

We monitor the aging of our receivables, including Fuddruckers franchising-related receivables, and record provisions for uncollectability as appropriate. Credit terms of accounts receivable associated with our culinary contract services business vary from 30 to 60 days based on contract terms.

We had a working capital deficit of ~~$16.7~~$19.1 million as of ~~February 15,~~May 9, 2012, compared to a working capital deficit of $18.7 million as of August 31, 2011. The ~~$2.0~~$0.4 million ~~decrease~~increase in the deficit was due to a $0.4 million ~~increase in current assets and a $1.6 million~~ decrease in current ~~liabilities.~~assets.

The $0.4 million ~~increase~~decrease in current assets was due to ~~an increase in inventories of $0.7 million and prepaid expenses of $0.3 million, offset by a $0.6~~$1.1 million decrease in accounts ~~receivables.~~receivable and $0.2 million in prepaid expenses, offset by a $0.9 million increase in inventories.

~~The $1.6 million decrease~~There was no significant change in current liabilities ~~was due to a $2.1~~for the three quarters ended May 9, 2012. Increases of $2.7 million ~~decrease~~ in accrued ~~expenses which include~~ payroll related expenses and $0.2 million in accounts payable were offset by decreases of $1.7 million in taxes other than income, ~~offset by a~~ $0.6 million ~~increase~~ in ~~accounts payable.~~accrued claims and insurance and $0.6 million in accrued income taxes.

Capital expenditures consist of purchases of real estate for future restaurant sites, purchase of property for rental income, new unit construction, purchases of new and replacement restaurant furniture and equipment, and ongoing remodeling programs. Capital expenditures for the ~~two~~three quarters ended ~~February 15,~~May 9, 2012 were ~~$9.2~~$16.1 million, and related to maintaining our investment in existing operating ~~units.~~units, acquiring new properties and new construction. We expect to continue to be able to fund all capital expenditures in fiscal year 2012 using cash flows from operations and availability under our revolving credit facility. We expect to spend ~~$15~~$20 million to ~~$20~~$25 million on capital expenditures in fiscal year 2012.

In November 2009, we entered into a revolving credit facility with Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Administrative Agent, and Amegy Bank, National Association, as Syndication Agent. The following description summarizes the material terms of the revolving credit facility, as subsequently amended as of January 31, 2010, July 26, 2010, September 30, 2010, October 31, 2010, August 25, 2011, and October 20, 2011 (the revolving credit facility, together with all amendments thereto, is referred to as the “2009 Credit Facility”). The 2009 Credit Facility is governed by the Credit Agreement dated as of November 9, 2009 (as amended to date, the “Credit Agreement”) among us, the lenders from time to time party thereto, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Administrative Agent, and Amegy Bank, National Association, as Syndication Agent. The maturity date of the 2009 Credit Facility is September 1, 2014.

The aggregate amount of the lenders’ commitments under the 2009 Credit Facility was $50.0 million as of ~~February 15,~~May 9, 2012. The 2009 Credit Facility also provides for the issuance of letters of credit in a maximum aggregate amount of $15.0 million outstanding at any one time. At ~~February 15,~~May 9, 2012, ~~$29.6~~$34.6 million was available under the 2009 Credit Facility.

The 2009 Credit Facility is guaranteed by all of our present or future subsidiaries. In addition, in connection with the expansion of the 2009 Credit Facility that accompanied our acquisition of substantially all of the assets of Fuddruckers in July 2010, Christopher J. Pappas, our President and Chief Executive Officer, and Harris J. Pappas, a member of our Board of Directors, guaranteed the payment of up to $13.0 million of our indebtedness under the 2009 Credit Facility. The maximum amount of this guaranty was reduced to $9.5 million on February 28, 2011, further reduced to $6.0 million on May 31, 2011 and reduced to zero as of August 25, 2011.

At any time throughout the term of the 2009 Credit Facility, we have the option to elect one of two bases of interest rates. One interest rate option is the greater of (a) the Federal Funds Effective Rate plus 0.50%, or (b) prime, plus, in either case, an applicable spread that ranges from 1.00% to 2.00% per annum. The other interest rate option is the London InterBank Offered Rate plus a spread that ranges from 2.75% to 3.75% per annum. The applicable spread under each option is dependent upon the ratio of our debt to EBITDA at the most recent determination date.

We are obligated to pay to the Administrative Agent for the account of each lender a quarterly commitment fee based on the average daily unused amount of the commitment of such lender, ranging from 0.30% to 0.40% per annum depending on our Total Leverage Ratio (as defined in the Credit Agreement) at the most recent determination date.

The proceeds of the 2009 Credit Facility are available for our general corporate purposes and general working capital purposes.

Borrowings under the 2009 Credit Facility are subject to mandatory repayment with the proceeds of sales of certain of our real property, subject to certain exceptions.

The 2009 Credit Facility is secured by a perfected first priority lien on certain of our real property and all of the material personal property owned by us or any of our subsidiaries, other than certain excluded assets (as defined in the Credit Agreement). At ~~February 15,~~May 9, 2012, the carrying value of the collateral securing the 2009 Credit Facility was ~~$87.3~~$87.5 million.

We were in compliance with the covenants contained in the Credit Agreement as of ~~February 15,~~May 9, 2012.

The Credit Agreement also includes customary events of default. If a default occurs and is continuing, the lenders’ commitments under the Credit Facility may be immediately terminated and/or we may be required to repay all amounts outstanding under the Credit Facility.

As of ~~February 15,~~May 9, 2012, we had ~~$19.5~~$14.5 million in outstanding loans and $0.9 million committed under letters of credit, which were issued as security for the payment of insurance obligations.

The Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 1 of Part 1 of this report were prepared in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Preparation of the financial statements requires us to make judgments, estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts of assets and liabilities in the financial statements and revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. Due to the significant, subjective and complex judgments and estimates used when preparing our consolidated financial statements, management regularly reviews these assumptions and estimates with the Finance and Audit Committee of our Board of Directors. Management believes the following are critical accounting policies used in the preparation of these financial statements.

The estimated future tax effects of temporary differences between the tax bases of assets and liabilities and amounts reported in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets, as well as operating loss and tax credit carrybacks and carryforwards are recorded. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on differences between financial reporting and tax bases of assets and liabilities (temporary differences) and are measured using the enacted tax rates and laws that will be in effect when the differences are expected to reverse. We periodically review the recoverability of tax assets recorded on the balance sheet and provide valuation allowances as management deems necessary.

If the future consequences of differences between financial reporting bases and tax bases of our assets and liabilities result in a net deferred tax asset, management will evaluate the probability of our ability to realize the future benefits of such asset. A valuation allowance related to a deferred tax asset is recorded when it is more likely than not that all or some portion of the deferred tax asset will not be realized. The realization of such net deferred tax will generally depend on whether we will have sufficient taxable income of an appropriate character within the carryforward period permitted by the tax law.

Management evaluates both positive and negative evidence, including its forecasts of our future taxable income adjusted by varying probability factors, in making a determination as to whether it is more likely than not that all or some portion of the deferred tax asset will be realized. Based on its analysis, management concluded that a valuation allowance was necessary.

The valuation allowance partially offsets our carryover of general business tax credits. These credits may be carried over up to twenty years ~~in the future~~ for possible utilization in the future. The carryover of the general business credits began in fiscal year 2006 and will begin to expire at the end of fiscal year 2026 through the end of fiscal year 2032 if not utilized by then.

Management makes judgments regarding the interpretation of tax laws that might be challenged upon an audit and cause changes to previous estimates of tax liability. We operate within multiple taxing jurisdictions and are subject to audit in these jurisdictions as well as by the Internal Revenue Service. In management’s opinion, adequate provisions for income taxes have been made for all open tax years. The potential outcomes of examinations are regularly assessed in determining the adequacy of the provision for income taxes and income tax liabilities. Management believes that adequate provisions have been made for reasonable and foreseeable outcomes related to uncertain tax matters. The Company is currently being audited by the State of Texas for franchise taxes and the State of Louisiana for income taxes and franchise taxes for report years 2008 through 2011 based on accounting years 2007 through 2010. There are no other audits or reviews at this time.

We periodically evaluate long-lived assets held for use and held for sale, whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of those assets may not be recoverable. We analyze historical cash flows of operating locations and compare results of poorer performing locations to more profitable locations. We also analyze lease terms, condition of the assets and related need for capital expenditures or repairs, construction activity in the surrounding area as well as the economic and market conditions in the surrounding area.

For assets held for use, we estimate future cash flows using assumptions based on possible outcomes of the areas analyzed. If the undiscounted future cash flows are less than the carrying value of our location’s assets, we record an impairment based on an estimate of discounted cash flows. The estimates of future cash flows, based on reasonable and supportable assumptions and projections, require management’s subjective judgments. Assumptions and estimates used include operating results, changes in working capital, discount rate, growth rate, anticipated net proceeds from disposition of the property and if applicable, lease terms. The span of time for

which future cash flows are estimated is often lengthy, increasing the sensitivity to assumptions made. The time span is longer and could be 20 to 25 years for newer properties, but only 5 to 10 years for older properties. Depending on the assumptions and estimates used, the estimated future cash flows projected in the evaluation of long-lived assets can vary within a wide range of outcomes. We consider the likelihood of possible outcomes in determining the best estimate of future cash flows. The measurement for such an impairment loss is then based on the fair value of the asset as determined by discounted cash flows. We operated 154 restaurants as of ~~February 15,~~May 9, 2012 and periodically experience unanticipated changes in our assumptions and estimates. Those changes could have a significant impact on discounted cash flow models with a corresponding significant impact on the measurement of an impairment. We believe we have ~~four~~two locations, with an aggregate net carrying value of assets held for use of ~~$2.9 million where~~$315,000, with respect to which it is possible that an impairment charge could be taken over the next 12 months.

We evaluate the useful lives of our intangible assets, primarily the Fuddruckers trade name and franchise agreements, to determine if they are definite or indefinite-lived. Reaching a determination of useful life requires significant judgments and assumptions regarding the future effects of obsolescence, contract term, demand, competition, other economic factors (such as the stability of the industry, legislative action that results in an uncertain or changing regulatory environment, and expected changes in distribution channels), the level of required maintenance expenditures, and the expected lives of other related groups of assets.

We periodically review long-lived assets against our plans to retain or ultimately dispose of properties. If we decide to dispose of a property, it will be moved to property held for sale and actively marketed. Property held for sale is recorded at amounts not in excess of what management currently expects to receive upon sale, less costs of disposal. We analyze market conditions each reporting period and record additional impairments due to declines in market values of like assets. The fair value of the property is determined by observable inputs such as appraisals and prices of comparable properties in active markets for assets like ours. Gains are not recognized until the properties are sold.

We self-insure a significant portion of risks and associated liabilities under our employee injury, workers’ compensation and general liability programs. We maintain insurance coverage with third party carriers to limit our per-occurrence claim exposure. We have recorded accrued liabilities for self-insurance based upon analysis of historical data and actuarial estimates, and we review these amounts on a quarterly basis to ensure that the liability is appropriate.

The significant assumptions made by the actuary to estimate self-insurance reserves, including incurred but not reported claims, are as follows: (1) historical patterns of loss development will continue in the future as they have in the past (Loss Development Method), (2) historical trend patterns and loss cost levels will continue in the future as they have in the past (Bornhuetter-Ferguson Method), and (3) historical claim counts and exposures are used to calculate historical frequency rates and average claim costs are analyzed to get a projected severity (Frequency and Severity Method). The results of these methods are blended by the actuary to provide the reserves estimates.

Actual workers’ compensation and employee injury claims expense may differ from estimated loss provisions. The ultimate level of claims under the in-house safety program are not known, and declines in incidence of claims as well as claims costs experiences or reductions in reserve requirements under the program may not continue in future periods.

Share-based compensation is recognized as compensation expense in the income statement utilizing the fair value on the date of the grant. The fair value of restricted stock units is valued at the closing market price of the Company’s common stock at the date of grant. The fair value of each option award is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. Assumptions for volatility, expected option life, risk free interest rate and dividend yield are used in the model.

In May 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-04, Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820), which amends the fair value measurement and disclosure requirements. The amendment is effective during interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2011. We are currently evaluating the impact on our consolidated financial statements.

It is generally our policy is to maintain stable menu prices without regard to seasonal variations in food costs. Certain increases in costs of food, wages, supplies, transportation and services may require us to increase our menu prices from time to time. To the extent prevailing market conditions allow, we intend to adjust menu prices to maintain profit margins.

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains statements that are “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. All statements contained in this Form 10-Q, other than statements of historical facts, are “forward-looking statements” for purposes of these provisions, including any statements regarding:

In some cases, investors can identify these statements by forward-looking words such as “anticipate,” “believe,” “could,” “estimate,” “expect,” “intend,” “outlook,” “may” “should,” “will,” and “would” or similar words. Forward-looking statements are based on certain assumptions and analyses made by management in light of their experience and perception of historical trends, current conditions, expected future developments and other factors we believe are relevant. Although management believes that our assumptions are reasonable based on information currently available, those assumptions are subject to significant risks and uncertainties, many of which are outside of our control. The following factors, as well as the factors set forth in Item 1A of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended August 31, 2011 and any other cautionary language in this Form 10-Q, provide examples of risks, uncertainties, and events that may cause our financial and operational results to differ materially from the expectations described in our forward-looking statements:

Each forward-looking statement speaks only as of the date of this Form 10-Q, and we undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. Investors should be aware that the occurrence of the events described above and elsewhere in this Form 10-Q could have material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, cash flows and financial condition.

We are exposed to market risk from changes in interest rates affecting our variable-rate debt. As of ~~February 15,~~May 9, 2012, the total amount of debt subject to interest rate fluctuations outstanding under our 2009 Credit Facility was ~~$19.5~~$14.5 million. Assuming an average debt balance of ~~$19.5~~$14.5 million, a 1.0% increase in prevailing interest rates would increase our annual interest expense by ~~$0.2~~$0.1 million.

Although we are not currently using interest rate swaps, we have previously used and may in the future use these instruments to manage cash flow risk on a portion of our variable-rate debt.

Many ingredients in the products sold in our restaurants are commodities, subject to unpredictable price fluctuations. We attempt to minimize price volatility by negotiating fixed price contracts for the supply of key ingredients and in some cases by passing increased commodity costs through to the customer by adjusting menu prices or menu offerings. Our ingredients are available from multiple suppliers so we are not dependent on a single vendor for our ingredients.

Management, under the supervision and with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as such term is defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”)), as of ~~February 15,~~May 9, 2012. Based on that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that, as of ~~February 15,~~May 9, 2012, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective in providing reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms.

There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the ~~two~~three quarters ended ~~February 15,~~May 9, 2012 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

There have been no material changes to our legal proceedings as disclosed in “Legal Proceedings” in Item 3 of Part I of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended August 31, 2011.

There have been no material changes during the quarter ended ~~February 15,~~May 9, 2012 to the Risk Factors discussed in Item 1A of Part I of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended August 31, 2011.

On June 13, 2012, we entered into an Amended and Restated Master Sales Agreement, effective November 16, 2011, with entities (the “Pappas entities”) controlled by Christopher J. Pappas, our Chief Executive Officer and a director, and Harris J. Pappas, our former Chief Operating Officer and a director. Pursuant to the agreement, the Pappas entities may provide specialized (customized) equipment fabrication and basic equipment maintenance, including stainless steel stoves, shelving, rolling carts and chef tables. The amended and restated agreement has substantially similar terms as the original Master Sales Agreement and will expire on November 16, 2013. Consistent with past practices, the Finance and Audit Committee of the Board of Directors (composed entirely of nonemployee directors) will review on a quarterly basis all amounts paid or payable under the Amended and Restated Master Sales Agreement. A copy of the Amended and Restated Master Sales Agreement is attached as Exhibit 10.1 to this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and is incorporated herein by reference.

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.


Delaware		74-1335253
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		(IRS Employer Identification No.)

13111 Northwest Freeway, Suite 600 Houston, Texas		77040
(Address of principal executive offices)		(Zip Code)


	Page
Part I—Financial Information

Item 1 Financial Statements		3

Item 2 Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations		16

Item 3 Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk		2726

Item 4 Controls and Procedures		2726

Part II—Other Information

Item 1 Legal Proceedings		2827

Item 1A Risk Factors		2827

Item 5 Other Information		27

Item 6 Exhibits		2827

Signatures		2928


	Restricted Stock Units			Weighted-Average Fair Value		Weighted-Average Remaining Contractual Term
				*(Per share)*		*(Years)*
Unvested at August 31, 2011		96,822		$	5.11		2.1
Granted		69,713			4.46		2.7
Vested		0			—		—
Forfeited		(2,589	)		—		—

Unvested at February 15, 2012		163,946		$	4.83		2.3


	Restricted Stock Units			Weighted-Average Fair Value		Weighted-Average Remaining Contractual Term
				*(Per share)*		*(Years)*
Unvested at August 31, 2011		96,822		$	5.11		2.1
Granted		69,713			4.46		2.5
Vested		—			—		—
Forfeited		(2,589	)		5.39		—

Unvested at May 9, 2012		163,946		$	4.83		1.9



10.1		Amended and Restated Master Sales Agreement effective November 16, 2011, by and among Luby’s, Inc., Pappas Restaurants, L.P., and Pappas Restaurants, Inc.

31.1		Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) certification of the Principal Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

31.2		Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) certification of the Principal Financial and Accounting Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

32.1		Section 1350 certification of the Principal Executive Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

32.2		Section 1350 certification of the Principal Financial and Accounting Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

101.INS		XBRL Instance Document

101.SCH		XBRL Schema Document

101.CAL		XBRL Calculation Linkbase Document

101.DEF		XBRL Definition Linkbase Document

101.LAB		XBRL Label Linkbase Document

101.PRE		XBRL Presentation Linkbase Document


	LUBY’S, INC. (Registrant)

Date: ~~March 23,~~June 15, 2012	By:	/s/ Christopher J. Pappas

		Christopher J. Pappas
		President and Chief Executive Officer
		(Principal Executive Officer)

Date: ~~March 23,~~June 15, 2012	By:	/s/ K. Scott Gray

		K. Scott Gray
		Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
		(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)

Large accelerated filer

Accelerated filer

Non-accelerated filer

Smaller reporting company