UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark one)

For the quarterly period ended March 31,June 30, 2012

or

For the transition period fromto.

Commission File Number: 000-24248

LRAD CORPORATION

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

15378 Avenue of Science, Ste. 100, San Diego, California 92128

(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

(858) 676-1112

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    x  Yes    ¨  No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).    x  Yes    ¨  No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    ¨  Yes    x  No

The number of shares of Common Stock, $0.00001 par value, outstanding on April 26,July 31, 2012 was 32,374,499.

LRAD CORPORATION

INDEX

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

LRAD Corporation

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

See accompanying notes

1

LRAD Corporation

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(Unaudited)

See accompanying notes

2

LRAD Corporation

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(Unaudited)

See accompanying notes

3

LRAD Corporation

Notes to Interim Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)

1. OPERATIONS

LRAD Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), is engaged in the design, development and commercialization of directed sound technologies and products. The principal markets for the Company’s proprietary sound reproduction technologies and products are in North and South America, Europe, Middle East and Asia.

2. BASIS OF PRESENTATION AND SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

General

The accompanying unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for interim financial information, the instructions to Form 10-Q and applicable sections of Regulation S-X. Certain information and note disclosures normally included in annual financial statements prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles have been condensed or omitted pursuant to those rules and regulations, although, in the opinion of management, the interim financial statements reflect all adjustments necessary and that disclosures included therein are adequate in order to make the financial statements not misleading. The condensed consolidated balance sheet as of September 30, 2011 was derived from the Company’s most recent audited financial statements. Operating results for the three and sixnine month periods are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year. The interim condensed financial statements and notes thereto should be read in conjunction with the Company’s audited financial statements and notes thereto for the year ended September 30, 2011 included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) on December 5, 2011.

Principles of Consolidation

The Company has a currently inactive wholly owned subsidiary, American Technology Holdings, Inc., which the Company formed to conduct international marketing, sales and distribution activities. The condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of this subsidiary after elimination of intercompany transactions and accounts.

Discontinued Operations

The financial statements presented herein reflect the spin-off of the Company’s Hypersonic Sound (“HSS”) business as a stand-alone company on September 27, 2010. The results of operationsaccompanying financial statements include some continued activity by the Company, designated as discontinued operations, to fulfill remaining sales and warranty obligations following the spin-off, are designated as discontinued operations in the accompanying financial statements.spin-off. Amounts reflected as discontinued operations in the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations include direct and allocated costs attributable to the former HSS business, but do not include allocations of general corporate overhead costs.

Reclassifications

Where necessary, the prior year’s information has been reclassified to conform to the current year presentation. These reclassifications had no effect on previously reported results of operations or retained earnings.

3. FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

At March 31,June 30, 2012, there was no difference between the carrying value and fair market value of the Company’s cash equivalents. For certain financial instruments, including accounts receivable, accounts payable and accrued expenses, the carrying amounts approximate fair value due to their relatively short maturities.

The Company does not have any financial assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis.

4. RESTRICTED CASH

Restricted cash was reported as follows:

4

The Company’s assets included restrictedRestricted cash which was pledged to support bank guarantees for product warranty of product delivered on a sales contract in the quarter ended March 31, 2011. The current portion covered the first year of product warranty, and the noncurrent portion was recently issued and will be renewed annually for seven years to cover each year of the extended warranty and maintenance agreement. The first year warranty term has been successfully completed and once proper approval for release is received, the current portion will become unrestricted and transferred to cash and cash equivalents in the current fiscal year, upon completion of the first year warranty term, and the noncurrent portion will remain for the duration of the seven year term. These assets are carried at cost, which approximates market value.

5. INVENTORIES

Inventories consisted of the following:

6. PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT

Property and equipment consisted of the following:

7. INTANGIBLE ASSETS

Intangible assets consisted of the following:

Each quarter, the Company reviews the ongoing value of its capitalized patent costs. In the first sixnine months of fiscal 2012 and 2011, some of these assets were identified as being associated with patents that are no longer consistent with itsthe Company’s business strategy. As a result of this review, the Company recorded a loss as shown above from the impairment of patents that were previously capitalized.

5

8. PREPAID MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT

At March 31, 2011, prepaid expenses included $1,500,000 paid to a third party provider in connection with the Company’s obligations under a sales contract to a foreign military service to provide repair and maintenance services over an eight year period for products sold under this contract. The total prepaid expense is being amortized on a straight-line basis at an annual rate of $187,500 over this eight-year period, and is being recognized as a component of cost of sales. Accordingly, as of March 31,June 30, 2012, $187,500 of the total prepayment was classified as a current asset and $1,125,000$1,078,125 was classified as noncurrent.

9. ACCRUED LIABILITIES AND OTHER LIABILITIES—NONCURRENT

Accrued liabilities consisted of the following:

The other current liabilities consists of accrued expenses for contracted services to fulfill the repair and maintenance agreement obligations required under the contract with the foreign military for units sold last year. Payment to the service provider will be made annually upon completion of each year of services. These services are being recorded in cost of revenues to correspond with the revenues for these services.

Deferred Revenue

Deferred revenue at March 31,June 30, 2012 and September 30, 2011 included $270,559 and $270,941, respectively, collected from a license agreement in advance of recognized revenue, and $2,106$23,301 and $0 of customer prepayments, respectively.

Warranty Reserve

Changes in the warranty reserve during the sixthree and nine months ended March 31,June 30, 2012 and 2011 were as follows:

10. INCOME TAXES

At March 31,June 30, 2012, the Company had federal net operating losses (“NOLs”) and related state NOLs. In accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 740, “Accounting for Income Taxes” (“ASC 740”), the Company recorded a full valuation allowance as it is more likely than not that some or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized in the future.

6

The Company did not record a tax provision during the sixnine months ended March 31,June 30, 2012 as the Company expects its annual effective tax rate to be zero. During the quarter ended June 30, 2012, the Company amended its federal tax return for the year ended September 30, 2008 to make an election to carry back its fiscal year ended September 30, 2008 applicable NOL for a period of 3 years, and carry forward the loss for up to 20 years, as per Section 172(b)(1)(H) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (“Section 172”), as amended per the American Recovery and Reinvestment Tax Act of 2009 for eligible small businesses. The Company also amended its federal tax returns for the years ended September 30, 2009 and 2010 and filed its federal tax return for the year ended September 30, 2011, during the quarter ended June 30, 2012, resulting in a federal income tax benefit of $152,333 and a federal income tax receivable of $166,339. The federal income tax benefit and federal income tax receivable were the result of the election made during the quarter ended June 30, 2012 to carry back NOLs and apply them against taxable income during those applicable tax years.

6

ASC 740 requires the Company to recognize in its financial statements uncertainties in tax positions taken that may not be sustained upon examination by the taxing authorities. If interest or penalties are assessed, the Company would recognize these charges as income tax expense. The Company has not recorded any income tax expense or benefit for uncertain tax positions.

The Company is subject to taxation in the U.S. and various state jurisdictions. All of the Company’s historical tax years are subject to examination by the Internal Revenue Service and various state jurisdictions due to the generation of NOL and credit carryforwards.

11. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

Bank and Other Cash Equivalent Deposits in Excess of FDIC Insurance Limits

The Company maintains cash and cash equivalent accounts with Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) insured financial institutions. Under provisions of the Dodd Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (“Dodd Frank Act”), unlimited FDIC insurance is provided for all funds in non-interest bearing transaction accounts through December 31, 2012. In addition, certain of the Company’s interest bearing collateral money market and savings accounts are each insured up to $250,000 by the FDIC. The Company’s exposure for amounts in excess of FDIC insured limits at March 31,June 30, 2012 was approximately $10,800,000.$10,788,000. The Company has not experienced any losses in such accounts.

Litigation

The Company may at times be involved in litigation in the ordinary course of business. The Company will, from time to time, when appropriate in management’s estimation, record adequate reserves in the Company’s financial statements for pending litigation. Currently, there are no pending material legal proceedingsThe Company was served with a complaint filed in the Delaware Court of Chancery captionedIroquois Master Fund Ltd., Plaintiff, v. Raymond C. Smith, Laura M. Clague, Helen C. Adams, Thomas R. Brown, and Katherine McDermott, Defendants, and LRAD Corporation, Nominal Defendant on July 24, 2012, subsequent to which the Company is a party or to which anyend of its property is subject.the quarter as more fully described in Note 16.

Bonus Plan

The Company has an incentive bonus plan for fiscal year 2012 designed to motivate its employees to achieve the Company’s financial objectives. All of the Company’s employees are entitled to participate in the incentive plan. Target Bonus Amountsbonus amounts (“Target”) vary based on a percentage of the employee’s base salary, which range from 10% to 50% of base salary, and a bonus payment may be made at three levels, including at 50% of Target, at 100% of Target and at 200% of Target, depending upon the achievement by the Company of specified earnings per share goals. Included in such calculation is the cost of the incentive plan. For purposes of the earnings per share calculation, the number of shares outstanding will also be held constant as of October 1, 2011. During the sixnine months ended March 31,June 30, 2012, the Company did not record any bonus expense in connection with the 2012 plan, compared to $583,202$193,598 and $773,535 recorded during the three and sixnine months ended March 31,June 30, 2011 in connection with the 2011 plan.

12. SHARE-BASED COMPENSATION

Stock Option Plans

At March 31,June 30, 2012, the Company had one equity incentive plan, the 2005 Equity Incentive Plan (“2005 Equity Plan”). The 2005 Equity Plan, as amended, authorizes for issuance as stock options, stock appreciation rights, or stock awards for an aggregate of 3,250,000 new shares of common stock to employees, directors or consultants. The total plan reserve includes these new shares and shares reserved under prior plans, allowing for the issuance of up to 4,999,564 shares. At March 31,June 30, 2012, there were options outstanding covering 3,969,7143,514,339 shares of common stock under the 2005 Equity Plan and an additional 963,602918,977 shares of common stock available for grant.

7

Stock Option Activity

The following table summarizes information about stock option activity during the sixnine months ended March 31,June 30, 2012:

Options outstanding are exercisable at prices ranging from $0.46 to $3.58$3.43 and expire over the period from 2012 to 2022 with an average remaining life of 2.075.11 years. The aggregate intrinsic value of options outstanding and exercisable at March 31,June 30, 2012 was $1,029,372$530,592 and $1,007,699,$529,860, respectively.

7

Share-Based Compensation

The Company recorded share-based compensation expense and classified it in the condensed consolidated statements of operations as follows:

The weighted-average estimated fair value of employee stock options granted during the periods below were calculated using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following weighted-average assumptions above (annualized percentages).

The Company has never paid cash dividends and has no present intentiondoes not intend to pay cash dividends. Expected volatility is based on the historical volatility of the Company’s common stock over the period commensurate with the expected life of the options. The risk-free interest rate is based on rates published by the Federal Reserve Board. The expected life is based on observed and expected time to post-vesting exercise. The expected forfeiture rate is based on past experience and employee retention data. Forfeitures are estimated at the time of the grant and revised in subsequent periods if actual forfeitures differ from those estimates or if the Company updates its estimated forfeiture rate. Such amounts will be recorded as a cumulative adjustment in the period in which the estimate is changed.

Since the Company has a NOL carryforward as of March 31,June 30, 2012, no excess tax benefit for the tax deductions related to share-based awards was recognized for the sixnine months ended March 31,June 30, 2012 and 2011. As of March 31,June 30, 2012, there was approximately $500,000$1,300,000 of total unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested share-based employee compensation arrangements. The cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 1.31.8 years.

13. STOCK PURCHASE WARRANTS

At March 31, 2012, the Company had 1,627,945 shares purchasable under outstanding warrants (the “2011 Warrants”) at an exercise price of $2.67, which are exercisable through February 4, 2016. The Company entered into a Registration Rights Agreement with the holders of the 2011 Warrants (“Warrant Holders”). Under this agreement, if the Warrant Holders are unable to re-sell the shares purchased upon exercise of the 2011 Warrants, the Company will be obligated to pay liquidated damages to the purchasers in the amount of $0.0267 per day per applicable share, but not to exceed a total of $0.534 per applicable share or a maximum of $869,323. This obligation will be effective for the five year term of the Warrants, or until all 2011 Warrants have been exercised.

8

14.13. INCOME (LOSS) INCOME PER SHARE

The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted earnings per share:

15.14. MAJOR CUSTOMERS

For the three months ended March 31,June 30, 2012, revenues from twoone customer accounted for 39% of revenues, and for the nine months ended June 30, 2012, revenues from three customers accounted for 22%18%, 11% and 10% of revenues, respectively, and for the six months ended March 31, 2012, revenues from two customers accounted for 14% and 16% of revenues, with no other single customer accounting for more than 10% of revenues. At March 31,June 30, 2012, accounts receivable from two customers accounted for 46%24% and 11%19% of total accounts receivable, respectively, with no other single customer accounting for more than 10% of the accounts receivable balance.

For the three and six months ended March 31,June 30, 2011, revenues from one customertwo customers accounted for 78%13% and 68%12% of revenues, respectively, with no other single customer accounting for more than 10% of revenues, and for the nine months ended June 30, 2011, revenues from one customer accounted for 60% of revenues, with no other single customer accounting for more than 10% of revenues. At March 31,June 30, 2011, accounts receivable from threefour customers accounted for 25%19%, 17%14%, 13% and 11% of total accounts receivable, respectively, with no other single customer accounting for more than 10% of the accounts receivable balance.

9

16.15. DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS REPORTING

The Company spun-off its wholly-owned subsidiary Parametric Sound Corporation (“Parametric”) effective September 27, 2010. The prior year results of operations relating to the HSS business for the nine months ended June 30, 2011 have been presented as discontinued operations in the Condensed Consolidated StatementStatements of Operations. The prior year Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets at September 30, 2011 also identifyinclude assets and liabilities retained by the Company tothat fulfill remaining warranty obligations for previous HSS shipments. There were no discontinued operations financing or investing activities in the prior year. Current year resultsnine months ended June 30, 2011. Results of operations and the assets and liabilities related to the HSS business for the current year are immaterial and are not reported as discontinued operations. The components of the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations, which are presented as discontinued operations, are as follows:

The components of the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets, which are presented as discontinued operations are as follows:

16. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

On July 24, 2012, the Company was served with a complaint filed in the Delaware Court of Chancery captionedIroquois Master Fund Ltd., Plaintiff, v. Raymond C. Smith, Laura M. Clague, Helen C. Adams, Thomas R. Brown, and Katherine McDermott, Defendants, and LRAD Corporation, Nominal Defendant. The derivative action claims that the defendants breached their fiduciary duties to the Company, caused the Company to waste its corporate assets and were unjustly enriched as a result of obtaining and approving the issuance of stock options to themselves with exercise prices that the plaintiff alleges were below fair market value on the date of grant in violation of the terms of the Company’s 2005 Equity Incentive Plan. The Company was also named in the action as a nominal defendant against which no recovery is sought. The plaintiff seeks rescission or repricing of the applicable stock options and other damages on behalf of the Company. The defendants and the Company believe the plaintiff’s claims are without merit and intend to defend against them vigorously.

The discussion and analysis set forth below is presented to show the results of continuing operations only, and does not discuss the results of discontinued operations from our former HSS business (see Note 1615 for further information on the discontinued operations). It should be read in conjunction with the accompanying unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements and the related notes included under Item 1 of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, together with Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2011.

Forward Looking Statements

This report contains certain statements of a forward-looking nature relating to future events or future performance. Words such as “expects,” “anticipates,” “intends,” “plans,” “believes,” “seeks,” “estimates” and similar expressions or variations of such words are intended to identify forward-looking statements, but are not the only means of identifying forward-looking statements. Prospective investors are cautioned that such statements are only predictions and that actual events or results may differ materially. In evaluating such statements, prospective investors should specifically consider various factors identified in this report and any matters set forth under Part I, Item 1A (Risk Factors) of our Annual Report on Form 10-K, which could cause actual results to differ materially from those indicated by such forward-looking statements.

10

Overview

We are a pioneer of highly intelligible, long range directed sound technologies and products. We aggressively seek to create markets for our products, and we are increasing our focus and investment in worldwide sales and marketing activities as we also continue to invest in product development.

In the quarter ended March 31,June 30, 2012, we had revenues of $2,400,441$3,160,911 compared to $15,503,075$2,381,883 in the quarter ended March 31,June 30, 2011. The quarter ended March 31, 2011 included delivery of a $12.1 million order to a foreign military customer, which was not repeated in the current year. We continue to pursue global opportunities, but orders have been slow due to military budget constraints. Gross margin for the quarter was 55%50% of net revenues, compared to 70%38% of net revenues for the quarter ended March 31, 2011, which was driven by higher margins on the foreign military order, which also resulted in a large commission payment of $3,062,000 in operating expenses.June 30, 2011. On a quarter over quarter basis, our revenues are expected to remain uneven.

10

Our LRAD-X product line uses directionality and focused acoustic output to clearly transmit critical information, instructions and warnings 1,500 meters and beyond. The LRAD-X product line features clear voice intelligibility and is available in a number of packages and form factors that meet stringent military environmental requirements. Through the use of powerful voice commands and deterrent tones, large safety zones can be created while determining the intent and influencing the behavior of potential security threats. Our LRAD-X product line provides a complete range of systems from single user portable to permanently installed, remotely operated. In fiscal 2011, we added wireless capability to our LRAD 100X product. Our LRAD products have been competitively selected over other commercially available systems by U.S. and several foreign militaries. Our LRAD-X product line includes the following:

Overall Business Outlook

We continue to experience positive responses to our expanding LRAD-X product line and increased global acceptance of our LRAD products. We believe we have a solid technology and product foundation for business growth. We have strong market opportunities within the government, military and commercial maritime sectors due to increasingongoing terrorist and piracy activity and growing global unrest. We are also experiencing growing interest from wind farms and mining operations with wildlife safety and control issues. We have continued to strengthen our selling network through the addition of in-house business development talent as well as key integrators and sales representatives within the U.S. and in a number of worldwide locations. However, we continue to face challenges in fiscal 2012 due to international market conditions that severely restrict credit and disrupt major economies, as well as uncertainty within the U.S. government budgeting process and restrictions that may be placed on military spending. A further or continued deterioration in financial markets and confidence in major economies, continued delays in U.S. government spending or extended reductions in military spending could negatively impact the expected continued growth of our business.

11

Critical Accounting Policies

We have identified a number of accounting policies as critical to our business operations and the understanding of our results of operations. These are described in our consolidated financial statements located in Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2011. The impact and any associated risks related to these policies on our business operations is discussed below and throughout Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations when such policies affect our reported and expected financial results.

The methods, estimates and judgments we use in applying our accounting policies, in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles in the U.S., have a significant impact on the results we report in our financial statements. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances. The estimates affect the carrying values of assets and liabilities. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.

11

Comparison of Results of Operations for the Three Months Ended March 31,June 30, 2012 and 2011

Revenues

The following table sets forth for the periods indicated certain items of our condensed consolidated statement of operations expressed in dollars and as a percentage of net revenues. The financial information and the discussion below should be read in conjunction with the condensed consolidated financial statements and notes contained in this report.