UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

x	QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended: ~~June~~September 30, 2012

¨	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period fromto

Commission file number: 000-53604

NOBLE CORPORATION

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)


Switzerland		98-0619597
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		(I.R.S. employer identification number)

~~Dorfstrasse 19A, Baar, Switzerland~~		~~6340~~
~~(Address of principal executive offices)~~		~~(Zip Code)~~

Dorfstrasse 19A, Baar, Switzerland 6340

(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)

Registrant’s Telephone Number, Including Area Code: 41 (41) 761-65-55

Commission file number: 001-31306

NOBLE CORPORATION

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Cayman Islands

98-0366361

(State or other jurisdiction of

incorporation or organization)

(I.R.S. employer

identification number)

Suite 3D, Landmark Square, 64 Earth Close, P.O. Box 31327 George Town, Grand Cayman, Cayman Islands, KY1-1206

(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)

Registrant’s Telephone Number, Including Area Code: (345) 938-0293

Indicate by check mark whether each registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether each registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether each registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):


Noble-Swiss:	Large accelerated filer x	Accelerated filer ¨	Non-accelerated filer ¨	Smaller reporting company ¨
Noble-Cayman:	Large accelerated filer¨	Accelerated filer¨	Non-accelerated filerx	Smaller reporting company¨

Indicate by check mark whether each registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes ¨ No x

Number of shares outstanding and trading at ~~July~~October 31, 2012: Noble Corporation (Switzerland) — ~~252,604,007~~252,720,353

Number of shares outstanding at ~~July~~October 31, 2012: Noble Corporation (Cayman Islands) — 261,245,693

Noble Corporation, a Cayman Islands company and a wholly owned subsidiary of Noble Corporation, a Swiss corporation, meets the conditions set forth in General Instructions H(1) (a) and (b) to Form 10-Q and is therefore filing this Form 10-Q with the reduced disclosure format contemplated by paragraphs (b) and (c) of General Instruction H(2) of Form 10-Q.

TABLE OF CONTENTS


			Page
PART I	~~PART I~~ FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1	Financial Statements

Noble Corporation (Noble-Swiss) Financial Statements:
	Consolidated Balance Sheet as of ~~June~~September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011			3
	Consolidated Statement of Income for the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2012 and 2011			4
	Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income for the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2012 and 2011			5
	Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2012 and 2011			6
	Consolidated Statement of Equity for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2012 and 2011			7

Noble Corporation (Noble-Cayman) Financial Statements:
	Consolidated Balance Sheet as of ~~June~~September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011			8
	Consolidated Statement of Income for the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2012 and 2011			9
	Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income for the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2012 and 2011			10
	Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2012 and 2011			11
	Consolidated Statement of Equity for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2012 and 2011			12

Notes to Combined Consolidated Financial Statements		13
Item 2
~~Item 2~~ Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations		36
Item 3	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk			50
Item 4	Controls and Procedures			51
PART II	~~PART II~~ OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1	Legal Proceedings			52
Item 2	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds			52
Item 6	Exhibits			52
	SIGNATURES			53
	Index to Exhibits			54

This combined Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q is separately filed by Noble Corporation, a Swiss corporation (“Noble-Swiss”), and Noble Corporation, a Cayman Islands company (“Noble-Cayman”). Information in this filing relating to Noble-Cayman is filed by Noble-Swiss and separately by Noble-Cayman on its own behalf. Noble-Cayman makes no representation as to information relating to Noble-Swiss (except as it may relate to Noble-Cayman) or any other affiliate or subsidiary of Noble-Swiss. Since Noble-Cayman meets the conditions specified in General Instructions H(1)(a) and (b) to Form 10-Q, it is permitted to use the reduced disclosure format for wholly owned subsidiaries of reporting companies. Accordingly, Noble-Cayman has omitted from this report the information called for by Item 3 (Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk) of Part I of Form 10-Q and the following items of Part II of Form 10-Q: Item 2 (Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds) and Item 3 (Defaults upon Senior Securities).

This report should be read in its entirety as it pertains to each Registrant. Except where indicated, the Consolidated Financial Statements and related Notes are combined. References in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q to “Noble,” the “Company,” “we,” “us,” “our” and words of similar meaning refer collectively to Noble-Swiss and its consolidated subsidiaries, including Noble-Cayman.

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements

~~Item 1.~~

~~Financial Statements~~

NOBLE CORPORATION (NOBLE-SWISS) AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET

(In thousands)

(Unaudited)


	June 30,			December 31,
	2012			2011			September 30, 2012			December 31, 2011
ASSETS
Current assets
Cash and cash equivalents	$	275,293		$	239,196		$	218,467		$	239,196
Accounts receivable		693,533			587,163			791,408			587,163
Taxes receivable		97,900			75,284			118,540			75,284
Prepaid expenses		78,463			35,796			64,644			35,796
Other current assets		142,541			122,173			111,433			122,173

Total current assets		1,287,730			1,059,612			1,304,492			1,059,612

Property and equipment, at cost		16,055,168			15,540,178			16,637,626			15,540,178
Accumulated depreciation		(3,632,532	)		(3,409,833	)		(3,825,482	)		(3,409,833	)

Property and equipment, net		12,422,636			12,130,345			12,812,144			12,130,345

Other assets		325,650			305,202			343,770			305,202

Total assets	$	14,036,016		$	13,495,159		$	14,460,406		$	13,495,159

LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
Current liabilities
Accounts payable	$	277,647		$	436,006		$	298,363		$	436,006
Accrued payroll and related costs		125,603			117,907			145,595			117,907
Interest payable		73,208			54,419			23,851			54,419
Taxes payable		89,262			94,920			130,551			94,920
Dividends payable		132,679			—			99,582			—
Other current liabilities		108,714			123,928			144,267			123,928

Total current liabilities		807,113			827,180			842,209			827,180

Long-term debt		4,444,294			4,071,964			4,639,429			4,071,964
Deferred income taxes		238,045			242,791			235,851			242,791
Other liabilities		306,397			255,372			353,595			255,372

Total liabilities		5,795,849			5,397,307			6,071,084			5,397,307

Commitments and contingencies

Shareholders’ equity
Shares; 253,076 and 252,639 shares outstanding		709,368			766,595
Treasury shares, at cost; 569 and 287 shares		(20,318	)		(10,553	)
Shares; 253,299 and 252,639 shares outstanding								709,993			766,595
Treasury shares, at cost; 586 and 287 shares								(20,986	)		(10,553	)
Additional paid-in capital		60,991			48,356			75,696			48,356
Retained earnings		6,823,758			6,676,444			6,938,434			6,676,444
Accumulated other comprehensive loss		(75,461	)		(74,321	)		(72,077	)		(74,321	)

Total shareholders’ equity		7,498,338			7,406,521			7,631,060			7,406,521
Noncontrolling interests		741,829			691,331			758,262			691,331

Total equity		8,240,167			8,097,852			8,389,322			8,097,852

Total liabilities and equity	$	14,036,016		$	13,495,159		$	14,460,406		$	13,495,159

See accompanying notes to the unaudited consolidated financial statements.

NOBLE CORPORATION (NOBLE-SWISS) AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME

(In thousands, except per share amounts)

(Unaudited)


	Three Months Ended						Six Months Ended
	June 30,						June 30,						Three Months Ended September 30,						Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2012			2011			2012			2011			2012			2011			2012			2011
Operating revenues
Contract drilling services	$	848,237		$	589,550		$	1,594,547		$	1,132,155		$	833,212		$	704,892		$	2,427,759		$	1,837,047
Reimbursables		30,812			24,122			65,953			46,413			28,137			17,438			94,090			63,851
Labor contract drilling services		19,863			14,012			35,871			27,559			22,667			15,564			58,538			43,123
Other		11			313			242			758			16			8			258			766

		898,923			627,997			1,696,613			1,206,885			884,032			737,902			2,580,645			1,944,787

Operating costs and expenses
Contract drilling services		423,502			336,728			843,513			643,091			449,125			358,547			1,292,638			1,001,638
Reimbursables		24,970			18,723			55,571			35,826			21,047			13,971			76,618			49,797
Labor contract drilling services		11,847			8,750			21,079			17,273			12,991			8,053			34,070			25,326
Depreciation and amortization		183,615			163,119			354,692			321,241			195,087			166,213			549,779			487,454
Selling, general and administrative		25,404			21,632			48,530			45,347			26,858			27,536			75,388			72,883
Loss on impairment		18,345			—			18,345			—			—			—			18,345			—
Gain on contract settlements/extinguishments, net		(33,255	)		—			(33,255	)		(21,202	)		—			—			(33,255	)		(21,202	)

		654,428			548,952			1,308,475			1,041,576			705,108			574,320			2,013,583			1,615,896

Operating income		244,495			79,045			388,138			165,309			178,924			163,582			567,062			328,891

Other income (expense)
Interest expense, net of amount capitalized		(20,652	)		(14,829	)		(31,148	)		(33,870	)		(25,635	)		(11,530	)		(56,783	)		(45,400	)
Interest income and other, net		1,188			(534	)		2,973			2,058			1,553			1,117			4,526			3,175

Income before income taxes		225,031			63,682			359,963			133,497			154,842			153,169			514,805			286,666
Income tax provision		(46,356	)		(9,508	)		(67,945	)		(24,867	)		(25,162	)		(17,614	)		(93,107	)		(42,481	)

Net income		178,675			54,174			292,018			108,630			129,680			135,555			421,698			244,185
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests		(18,857	)		(91	)		(12,025	)		(52	)		(14,906	)		(238	)		(26,931	)		(290	)

Net income attributable to Noble Corporation	$	159,818		$	54,083		$	279,993		$	108,578		$	114,774		$	135,317		$	394,767		$	243,895

Net income per share
Basic	$	0.63		$	0.21		$	1.10		$	0.43		$	0.45		$	0.53		$	1.55		$	0.96
Diluted	$	0.63		$	0.21		$	1.10		$	0.43		$	0.45		$	0.53		$	1.55		$	0.96

See accompanying notes to the unaudited consolidated financial statements.

NOBLE CORPORATION (NOBLE-SWISS) AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

(In thousands)

(Unaudited)


	Three Months Ended						Six Months Ended
	June 30,						June 30,						Three Months Ended September 30,						Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2012			2011			2012			2011			2012			2011			2012			2011
Net income	$	178,675		$	54,174		$	292,018		$	108,630		$	129,680		$	135,555		$	421,698		$	244,185

Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax
Foreign currency translation adjustments		(6,949	)		1,375			(7,027	)		4,382			2,033			(4,929	)		(4,994	)		(547	)
Gain on foreign currency forward contracts		644			2,351			3,061			2,513
Gain (loss) on foreign currency forward contracts														—			(9,654	)		3,061			(7,141	)
Loss on interest rate swaps		—			—			—			(366	)		—			—			—			(366	)
Amortization of deferred pension plan amounts (net of tax provision of $647 and $353 for the three months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively, and $1,367 and $705 for the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively)		1,404			689			2,826			1,375
Amortization of deferred pension plan amounts (net of tax provision of $790 and $356 for the three months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively, and $2,157 and $1,061 for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively)														1,351			687			4,177			2,062

Other comprehensive income/(loss), net		(4,901	)		4,415			(1,140	)		7,904			3,384			(13,896	)		2,244			(5,992	)

Net comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interests		(18,857	)		(91	)		(12,025	)		(52	)		(14,906	)		(238	)		(26,931	)		(290	)

Comprehensive income attributable to Noble Corporation	$	154,917		$	58,498		$	278,853		$	116,482		$	118,158		$	121,421		$	397,011		$	237,903

See accompanying notes to the unaudited consolidated financial statements.

NOBLE CORPORATION (NOBLE-SWISS) AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS

(In thousands)

(Unaudited)


	Six Months Ended
	June 30,						Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2012			2011			2012			2011
Cash flows from operating activities
Net income	$	292,018		$	108,630		$	421,698		$	244,185
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash from operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization		354,692			321,241			549,779			487,454
Loss on impairment		18,345			—			18,345			—
Gain on contract extinguishments, net		—			(21,202	)		—			(21,202	)
Deferred income taxes		(7,765	)		(1,753	)		(16,090	)		(34,549	)
Amortization of share-based compensation		17,840			16,388			28,782			26,857
Net change in other assets and liabilities		(139,184	)		(190,536	)		(71,010	)		(243,715	)

Net cash from operating activities		535,946			232,768			931,504			459,030

Cash flows from investing activities
Capital expenditures		(665,140	)		(1,416,215	)		(1,247,139	)		(1,972,572	)
Change in accrued capital expenditures		(159,134	)		(51,500	)		(195,044	)		(48,782	)
Refund from contract extinguishments		—			18,642			—			18,642

Net cash from investing activities		(824,274	)		(1,449,073	)		(1,442,183	)		(2,002,712	)

Cash flows from financing activities
Borrowings on bank credit facilities		325,000			625,000
Repayments on bank credit facilities		(1,150,000	)		(240,000	)
Change in bank credit facilities, net								(630,000	)		675,000
Proceeds from issuance of senior notes, net of debt issuance costs		1,186,636			1,087,833			1,186,636			1,087,833
Contributions from joint venture partners		40,000			436,000			40,000			481,000
Payments of joint venture debt		—			(693,494	)		—			(693,494	)
Settlement of interest rate swaps		—			(29,032	)		—			(29,032	)
Par value reduction payments		(71,897	)		(72,141	)
Par value reduction/dividend payments								(105,092	)		(114,453	)
Financing costs on credit facilities		(5,014	)		(2,835	)		(5,014	)		(2,835	)
Proceeds from employee stock transactions		9,465			7,357			13,853			9,018
Repurchases of employee shares surrendered for taxes		(9,765	)		(9,377	)		(10,433	)		(10,211	)

Net cash from financing activities		324,425			1,109,311			489,950			1,402,826

Net change in cash and cash equivalents		36,097			(106,994	)		(20,729	)		(140,856	)
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period		239,196			337,871			239,196			337,871

Cash and cash equivalents, end of period	$	275,293		$	230,877		$	218,467		$	197,015

See accompanying notes to the unaudited consolidated financial statements.

NOBLE CORPORATION (NOBLE-SWISS) AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF EQUITY

(In thousands)

(Unaudited)


																Accumulated
							Additional									Other
	Shares						Paid-in			Retained			Treasury			Comprehensive			Noncontrolling			Total			Shares						Additional Paid-in			Retained			Treasury			Accumulated Other Comprehensive			Noncontrolling		Total
	Balance			Par Value			Capital			Earnings			Shares			Loss			Interests			Equity			Balance			Par Value			Capital			Earnings			Shares			Loss			Interests		Equity
Balance at December 31, 2010		262,415		$	917,684		$	39,006		$	6,630,500		$	(373,967	)	$	(50,220	)	$	124,631		$	7,287,634			262,415		$	917,684		$	39,006		$	6,630,500		$	(373,967	)	$	(50,220	)	$	124,631	$	7,287,634

Employee related equity activity
Amortization of share-based compensation		—			—			16,388			—			—			—			—			16,388			—			—			26,857			—			—			—			—		26,857
Issuance of share-based compensation shares		176			606			(599	)		—			—			—			—			7			248			844			(837	)		—			—			—			—		7
Exercise of stock options		389			1,294			5,782			—			—			—			—			7,076			490			1,629			7,104			—			—			—			—		8,733
Tax benefit of stock options exercised		—			—			274			—			—			—			—			274			—			—			278			—			—			—			—		278
Restricted shares forfeited or repurchased for taxes		(312	)		(1,084	)		1,084			—			(9,377	)		—			—			(9,377	)		(319	)		(1,107	)		1,107			—			(10,211	)		—			—		(10,211	)
Retirement of treasury shares																										(10,116	)		(33,035	)					(340,612	)		373,647			—			—		—
Settlement of FIN48 provision																										—			—						15,658			—			—			—		15,658
Net income		—			—			—			108,578			—			—			52			108,630			—			—			—			243,895			—			—			290		244,185
Par value reduction payments		—			(60,705	)		(11,436	)		—			—			—			—			(72,141	)		—			(89,948	)		(24,505	)		—			—			—			—		(114,453	)
Equity contribution by joint venture partner		—			—			—			—			—			—			473,973			473,973			—			—			—			—			—			—			518,973		518,973
Other comprehensive income, net		—			—			—			—			—			7,904			—			7,904
Other comprehensive loss, net																										—			—			—			—			—			(5,992	)		—		(5,992	)

Balance at June 30, 2011		262,668		$	857,795		$	50,499		$	6,739,078		$	(383,344	)	$	(42,316	)	$	598,656		$	7,820,368
Balance at September 30, 2011																										252,718		$	796,067		$	49,010		$	6,549,441		$	(10,531	)	$	(56,212	)	$	643,894	$	7,971,669

Balance at December 31, 2011		252,639		$	766,595		$	48,356		$	6,676,444		$	(10,553	)	$	(74,321	)	$	691,331		$	8,097,852			252,639		$	766,595		$	48,356		$	6,676,444		$	(10,553	)	$	(74,321	)	$	691,331	$	8,097,852

Employee related equity activity
Amortization of share-based compensation		—			—			17,840			—			—			—			—			17,840			—			—			28,782			—			—			—			—		28,782
Issuance of share-based compensation shares		364			1,104			(1,099	)		—			—			—			—			5			428			1,284			(1,276	)		—			—			—			—		8
Exercise of stock options		447			1,277			8,735			—			—			—			—			10,012			606			1,722			10,949			—			—			—			—		12,671
Tax benefit of stock options exercised		—			—			(552	)		—			—			—			—			(552	)		—			—			1,174			—			—			—			—		1,174
Restricted shares forfeited or repurchased for taxes		(374	)		(1,138	)		1,138			—			(9,765	)		—			—			(9,765	)		(374	)		(1,138	)		1,138			—			(10,433	)		—			—		(10,433	)
Net income		—			—			—			279,993			—			—			12,025			292,018			—			—			—			394,767			—			—			26,931		421,698
Equity contribution by joint venture partner		—			—			—			—			—			—			40,000			40,000			—			—			—			—			—			—			40,000		40,000
Other		—			—			—			—			—			—			(1,527	)		(1,527	)
Par value reduction payments		—			(58,470	)		(13,427	)		—			—			—			—			(71,897	)
Par value reduction/dividend payments																										—			(58,470	)		(13,427	)		(33,195	)		—			—			—		(105,092	)
Dividends payable		—			—			—			(132,679	)		—			—			—			(132,679	)		—			—			—			(99,582	)		—			—			—		(99,582	)
Other comprehensive loss, net		—			—			—			—			—			(1,140	)		—			(1,140	)
Other comprehensive income, net																										—			—			—			—			—			2,244			—		2,244

Balance at June 30, 2012		253,076		$	709,368		$	60,991		$	6,823,758		$	(20,318	)	$	(75,461	)	$	741,829		$	8,240,167
Balance at September 30, 2012																										253,299		$	709,993		$	75,696		$	6,938,434		$	(20,986	)	$	(72,077	)	$	758,262	$	8,389,322

See accompanying notes to the unaudited consolidated financial statements.

NOBLE CORPORATION (NOBLE-CAYMAN) AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET

(In thousands)

(Unaudited)


	June 30,			December 31,
	2012			2011			September 30, 2012			December 31, 2011
ASSETS
Current assets
Cash and cash equivalents	$	267,870		$	235,056		$	213,681		$	235,056
Accounts receivable		693,533			587,163			791,408			587,163
Taxes receivable		97,745			75,284			118,354			75,284
Prepaid expenses		76,630			33,105			61,536			33,105
Other current assets		142,541			120,109			111,433			120,109

Total current assets		1,278,319			1,050,717			1,296,412			1,050,717

Property and equipment, at cost		16,019,544			15,505,994			16,601,975			15,505,994
Accumulated depreciation		(3,626,272	)		(3,404,589	)		(3,818,729	)		(3,404,589	)

Property and equipment, net		12,393,272			12,101,405			12,783,246			12,101,405

Other assets		325,733			305,283			343,852			305,283

Total assets	$	13,997,324		$	13,457,405		$	14,423,510		$	13,457,405

LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
Current liabilities
Accounts payable	$	276,398		$	435,729		$	297,969		$	435,729
Accrued payroll and related costs		117,037			108,908			134,010			108,908
Interest payable		73,208			54,419			23,851			54,419
Taxes payable		84,893			91,190			126,112			91,190
Other current liabilities		108,676			123,399			144,267			123,399

Total current liabilities		660,212			813,645			726,209			813,645

Long-term debt		4,444,294			4,071,964			4,639,429			4,071,964
Deferred income taxes		238,045			242,791			235,851			242,791
Other liabilities		306,397			255,372			353,595			255,372

Total liabilities		5,648,948			5,383,772			5,955,084			5,383,772

Commitments and contingencies

Shareholder equity
Ordinary shares; 261,246 shares outstanding		26,125			26,125			26,125			26,125
Capital in excess of par value		461,054			450,616			466,028			450,616
Retained earnings		7,194,829			6,979,882			7,290,088			6,979,882
Accumulated other comprehensive loss		(75,461	)		(74,321	)		(72,077	)		(74,321	)

Total shareholder equity		7,606,547			7,382,302			7,710,164			7,382,302

Noncontrolling interests		741,829			691,331			758,262			691,331

Total equity		8,348,376			8,073,633			8,468,426			8,073,633

Total liabilities and equity	$	13,997,324		$	13,457,405		$	14,423,510		$	13,457,405

See accompanying notes to the unaudited consolidated financial statements.

NOBLE CORPORATION (NOBLE-CAYMAN) AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME

(In thousands)

(Unaudited)


	Three Months Ended						Six Months Ended
	June 30,						June 30,						Three Months Ended September 30,						Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2012			2011			2012			2011			2012			2011			2012			2011
Operating revenues
Contract drilling services	$	848,237		$	589,550		$	1,594,547		$	1,132,155		$	833,212		$	704,892		$	2,427,759		$	1,837,047
Reimbursables		30,812			24,122			65,953			46,413			28,137			17,438			94,090			63,851
Labor contract drilling services		19,863			14,012			35,871			27,559			22,667			15,564			58,538			43,123
Other		11			313			242			758			16			8			258			766

		898,923			627,997			1,696,613			1,206,885			884,032			737,902			2,580,645			1,944,787

Operating costs and expenses
Contract drilling services		421,598			330,204			836,744			631,036			444,225			349,626			1,280,969			980,662
Reimbursables		24,970			18,723			55,571			35,826			21,047			13,971			76,618			49,797
Labor contract drilling services		11,847			8,750			21,079			17,273			12,991			8,053			34,070			25,326
Depreciation and amortization		183,103			162,636			353,676			320,291			194,595			165,719			548,271			486,010
Selling, general and administrative		15,467			14,642			29,477			31,173			15,487			17,637			44,964			48,810
Loss on impairment		18,345			—			18,345			—			—			—			18,345			—
Gain on contract settlements/extinguishments, net		(33,255	)		—			(33,255	)		(21,202	)		—			—			(33,255	)		(21,202	)

		642,075			534,955			1,281,637			1,014,397			688,345			555,006			1,969,982			1,569,403

Operating income		256,848			93,042			414,976			192,488			195,687			182,896			610,663			375,384

Other income (expense)
Interest expense, net of amount capitalized		(20,652	)		(14,829	)		(31,148	)		(33,870	)		(25,635	)		(11,530	)		(56,783	)		(45,400	)
Interest income and other, net		1,608			(147	)		3,007			2,094			1,361			1,884			4,368			3,978

Income before income taxes		237,804			78,066			386,835			160,712			171,413			173,250			558,248			333,962
Income tax provision		(45,977	)		(9,157	)		(67,188	)		(24,182	)		(24,784	)		(17,298	)		(91,972	)		(41,480	)

Net income		191,827			68,909			319,647			136,530			146,629			155,952			466,276			292,482
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests		(18,857	)		(91	)		(12,025	)		(52	)		(14,906	)		(238	)		(26,931	)		(290	)

Net income attributable to Noble Corporation	$	172,970		$	68,818		$	307,622		$	136,478		$	131,723		$	155,714		$	439,345		$	292,192

See accompanying notes to the unaudited consolidated financial statements.

NOBLE CORPORATION (NOBLE-CAYMAN) AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

(In thousands)

(Unaudited)


	Three Months Ended						Six Months Ended
	June 30,						June 30,						Three Months Ended September 30,						Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2012			2011			2012			2011			2012			2011			2012			2011
Net income	$	191,827		$	68,909		$	319,647		$	136,530		$	146,629		$	155,952		$	466,276		$	292,482

Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax
Foreign currency translation adjustments		(6,949	)		1,375			(7,027	)		4,382			2,033			(4,929	)		(4,994	)		(547	)
Gain on foreign currency forward contracts		644			2,351			3,061			2,513
Gain (loss) on foreign currency forward contracts														—			(9,654	)		3,061			(7,141	)
Loss on interest rate swaps		—			—			—			(366	)		—			—			—			(366	)
Amortization of deferred pension plan amounts (net of tax provision of $647 and $353 for the three months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively, and $1,367 and $705 for the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively)		1,404			689			2,826			1,375
Amortization of deferred pension plan amounts (net of tax provision of $790 and $356 for the three months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively, and $2,157 and $1,061 for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively)														1,351			687			4,177			2,062

Other comprehensive income/(loss), net		(4,901	)		4,415			(1,140	)		7,904			3,384			(13,896	)		2,244			(5,992	)

Net comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interests		(18,857	)		(91	)		(12,025	)		(52	)		(14,906	)		(238	)		(26,931	)		(290	)

Comprehensive income attributable to Noble Corporation	$	168,069		$	73,233		$	306,482		$	144,382		$	135,107		$	141,818		$	441,589		$	286,200

See accompanying notes to the unaudited consolidated financial statements.

NOBLE CORPORATION (NOBLE-CAYMAN) AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS

(In thousands)

(Unaudited)


	Six Months Ended
	June 30,						Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2012			2011			2012			2011
Cash flows from operating activities
Net income	$	319,647		$	136,530		$	466,276		$	292,482
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash from operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization		353,676			320,291			548,271			486,010
Loss on impairment		18,345			—			18,345			—
Gain on contract extinguishments, net		—			(21,202	)		—			(21,202	)
Deferred income taxes		(7,765	)		(1,753	)		(16,090	)		(34,549	)
Capital contribution by parent — share-based compensation		10,438			10,228
Capital contribution by parent- shared-based compensation								15,412			15,150
Net change in other assets and liabilities		(142,640	)		(197,617	)		(75,357	)		(250,433	)

Net cash from operating activities		551,701			246,477			956,857			487,458

Cash flows from investing activities
Capital expenditures		(663,700	)		(1,411,282	)		(1,245,671	)		(1,967,618	)
Change in accrued capital expenditures		(159,134	)		(51,500	)		(195,044	)		(48,782	)
Refund from contract extinguishments		—			18,642			—			18,642

Net cash from investing activities		(822,834	)		(1,444,140	)		(1,440,715	)		(1,997,758	)

Cash flows from financing activities
Borrowings on bank credit facilities		325,000			625,000
Repayments on bank credit facilities		(1,150,000	)		(240,000	)
Change in bank credit facilities, net								(630,000	)		675,000
Proceeds from issuance of senior notes, net of debt issuance costs		1,186,636			1,087,833			1,186,636			1,087,833
Contributions from joint venture partners		40,000			436,000			40,000			481,000
Payments of joint venture debt		—			(693,494	)		—			(693,494	)
Settlement of interest rate swaps		—			(29,032	)		—			(29,032	)
Financing costs on credit facilities		(5,014	)		(2,835	)		(5,014	)		(2,835	)
Distributions to parent company, net		(92,675	)		(94,291	)		(129,139	)		(149,566	)

Net cash from financing activities		303,947			1,089,181			462,483			1,368,906

Net change in cash and cash equivalents		32,814			(108,482	)		(21,375	)		(141,394	)
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period		235,056			333,399			235,056			333,399

Cash and cash equivalents, end of period	$	267,870		$	224,917		$	213,681		$	192,005

See accompanying notes to the unaudited consolidated financial statements.

NOBLE CORPORATION (NOBLE-CAYMAN) AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF EQUITY

(In thousands)

(Unaudited)


										Accumulated																		Accumulated
					Capital in					Other													Capital in					Other
	Shares				Excess of		Retained			Comprehensive			Noncontrolling			Total			Shares				Excess of		Retained			Comprehensive			Noncontrolling		Total
	Balance		Par Value		Par Value		Earnings			Loss			Interests			Equity			Balance		Par Value		Par Value		Earnings			Loss			Interests		Equity
Balance at December 31, 2010		261,246	$	26,125	$	416,232	$	6,743,887		$	(50,220	)	$	124,631		$	7,260,655			261,246	$	26,125	$	416,232	$	6,743,887		$	(50,220	)	$	124,631	$	7,260,655
Net income		—		—		—		136,478			—			52			136,530			—		—		—		292,192			—			290		292,482
Capital contributions by parent — share-based compensation		—		—		10,228		—			—			—			10,228
Capital contributions by parent— share-based compensation																				—		—		15,150		—			—			—		15,150
Distributions to parent		—		—		—		(94,291	)		—			—			(94,291	)		—		—		—		(149,566	)		—			—		(149,566	)
Settlement of FIN48 provision																				—		—		15,658		—			—			—		15,658
Noncontrolling interest contributions		—		—		—		—			—			473,973			473,973			—		—		—		—			—			518,973		518,973
Other comprehensive income, net		—		—		—		—			7,904			—			7,904			—		—		—		—			(5,992	)		—		(5,992	)

Balance at June 30, 2011		261,246	$	26,125	$	426,460	$	6,786,074		$	(42,316	)	$	598,656		$	7,794,999
Balance at September 30, 2011																				261,246	$	26,125	$	447,040	$	6,886,513		$	(56,212	)	$	643,894	$	7,947,360

Balance at December 31, 2011		261,246	$	26,125	$	450,616	$	6,979,882		$	(74,321	)	$	691,331		$	8,073,633			261,246	$	26,125	$	450,616	$	6,979,882		$	(74,321	)	$	691,331	$	8,073,633
Net income		—		—		—		307,622			—			12,025			319,647			—		—		—		439,345			—			26,931		466,276
Capital contributions by parent — share-based compensation		—		—		10,438		—			—			—			10,438
Capital contributions by parent— share-based compensation																				—		—		15,412		—			—			—		15,412
Distributions to parent		—		—		—		(92,675	)		—			—			(92,675	)		—		—		—		(129,139	)		—			—		(129,139	)
Other		—		—		—		—			—			(1,527	)		(1,527	)
Noncontrolling interest contributions		—		—		—		—			—			40,000			40,000			—		—		—		—			—			40,000		40,000
Other comprehensive loss, net		—		—		—		—			(1,140	)		—			(1,140	)		—		—		—		—			2,244			—		2,244

Balance at June 30, 2012		261,246	$	26,125	$	461,054	$	7,194,829		$	(75,461	)	$	741,829		$	8,348,376
Balance at September 30, 2012																				261,246	$	26,125	$	466,028	$	7,290,088		$	(72,077	)	$	758,262	$	8,468,426

See accompanying notes to the unaudited consolidated financial statements.

NOBLE CORPORATION (NOBLE-SWISS) AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOBLE CORPORATION (NOBLE-CAYMAN) AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unless otherwise indicated, dollar amounts in tables are in thousands, except per share data)

Note 1 — Organization and Basis of Presentation

Noble Corporation, a Swiss corporation (“Noble-Swiss”), is a leading provider of offshore contract drilling services for the oil and gas industry. Our fleet of 79 mobile offshore drilling units consists of 14 semisubmersibles, 14 drillships, 49 jackups and two submersibles. Additionally, we have one floating production storage and offloading unit. Our fleet includes 11 units under construction as follows:

five dynamically positioned, ultra-deepwater, harsh environment drillships and

six high-specification heavy-duty, harsh environment jackup rigs.

Our global fleet is currently located in the following areas: the U.S. Gulf of Mexico and Alaska, Mexico, Brazil, the North Sea, the Mediterranean, West Africa, the Middle East, India, Australia and the Asian Pacific. Noble and its predecessors have been engaged in the contract drilling of oil and gas wells since 1921.

Noble Corporation, a Cayman Islands company (“Noble-Cayman”) is a direct, wholly-owned subsidiary of Noble-Swiss, our publicly-traded parent company. Noble-Swiss’ principal asset is all of the shares of Noble-Cayman. Noble-Cayman has no public equity outstanding. The consolidated financial statements of Noble-Swiss include the accounts of Noble-Cayman, and Noble-Swiss conducts substantially all of its business through Noble-Cayman and its subsidiaries.

The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements of Noble-Swiss and Noble-Cayman have been prepared pursuant to the rules and regulations of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) as they pertain to Form 10-Q. Accordingly, certain information and disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) have been condensed or omitted pursuant to such rules and regulations. The unaudited financial statements reflect all adjustments which are, in the opinion of management, necessary for a fair statement of the financial position and results of operations for the interim periods, on a basis consistent with the annual audited consolidated financial statements. All such adjustments are of a recurring nature. The December 31, 2011 Consolidated Balance Sheets presented herein are derived from the December 31, 2011 audited consolidated financial statements. These interim financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011, filed by both Noble-Swiss and Noble-Cayman. The results of operations for interim periods are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full year.

Certain amounts in prior periods have been reclassified to conform to the current year presentation. In connection with a review of the “Other Assets” caption in our financial statements, we determined that drilling equipment replacements and upgrades should be included in “Property and equipment”. As a result, we reclassified these amounts in our consolidated balance sheet for the year ended December 31, 2011. This reclassification is immaterial to the prior period financial statements.

Note 2 — Consolidated Joint Ventures

We own a 50 percent ~~interest~~interests in two joint ventures, each with a subsidiary of Royal Dutch Shell, PLC (“Shell”), for the construction and operation of our two Bully-class drillships. Since these entities’ equity at risk is insufficient to permit them to carry on their activities without additional financial support, they each meet the criteria for a variable interest entity. We have determined that we are the primary beneficiary for accounting purposes. Accordingly, we consolidate the entities in our consolidated financial statements after eliminating intercompany transactions. Shell’s equity interests are presented as noncontrolling interests on our Consolidated Balance Sheets.

In April 2011, the Bully joint venture partners entered into capital contribution agreements whereby capital calls up to a total of $360 million can be made for funds needed to complete the construction of the drillships. All contributions under these agreements were made during 2011 and the first quarter of 2012. No amounts remain available under these agreements.

At ~~June~~September 30, 2012, the combined carrying amount of the drillships was ~~$1.4~~$1.5 billion, which was primarily funded through partners’ equity contributions.

NOBLE CORPORATION (NOBLE-SWISS) AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOBLE CORPORATION (NOBLE-CAYMAN) AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unless otherwise indicated, dollar amounts in tables are in thousands, except per share data)

Note 3 — Share Data

Share capital

The following is a detail of Noble-Swiss’ authorized share capital as of ~~June~~September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011:


	June 30,		December 31,
	2012		2011		September 30, 2012		December 31, 2011
Shares outstanding and trading		252,507		252,352		252,713		252,352
Treasury shares		569		287		586		287

Total shares outstanding		253,076		252,639		253,299		252,639

Treasury shares held for share-based compensation plans		13,074		13,511		12,851		13,511

Total shares authorized for issuance		266,150		266,150		266,150		266,150

Par value per share (in Swiss Francs)		3.15		3.41		3.15		3.41

Repurchased treasury shares are recorded at cost, and include both shares repurchased pursuant to our Board of Directors approved share repurchase program and shares surrendered by employees for taxes payable upon the vesting of restricted stock. The number of shares that we may hold in treasury is limited under Swiss law. At ~~June~~September 30, 2012, 6.8 million shares remained available for repurchase under the authorization by the Board of Directors noted above. No shares were repurchased under this authorization during the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2012.

Our Board of Directors may further increase Noble-Swiss’ share capital through the issuance of up to 133.1 million authorized registered shares without obtaining shareholder approval. The issuance of these authorized registered shares is subject to certain conditions regarding their use.

In April 2012, our shareholders approved the payment of a dividend ~~funded from our capital contribution reserve~~ aggregating $0.52 per share to be paid in four equal installments ~~scheduled for~~the first of which was paid in August 2012, with the remaining three installments to be paid in November 2012, February 2013 and May ~~2013.~~2013, respectively. These dividends will require us to make cash payments of approximately ~~$66~~$33 million induring the fourth quarter of 2012, based on the number of shares currently outstanding. ~~In connection with this approval and the resulting obligation to shareholders,~~As of September 30, 2012, we ~~recorded~~had $100 million of dividends payable ~~of approximately $133 million during the second quarter of 2012.~~outstanding on this obligation. Any additional issuances of shares would further increase our obligation.

NOBLE CORPORATION (NOBLE-SWISS) AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOBLE CORPORATION (NOBLE-CAYMAN) AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unless otherwise indicated, dollar amounts in tables are in thousands, except per share data)

Earnings per share

The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted earnings per share for Noble-Swiss:


	Three months ended						Six months ended						Three months ended						Nine months ended
	June 30,						June 30,						September 30,						September 30,
	2012			2011			2012			2011			2012			2011			2012			2011
Allocation of net income
Basic
Net income attributable to Noble Corporation	$	159,818		$	54,083		$	279,993		$	108,578		$	114,774		$	135,317		$	394,767		$	243,895
Earnings allocated to unvested share-based payment awards		(1,694	)		(572	)		(2,797	)		(1,083	)		(1,192	)		(1,415	)		(4,008	)		(2,487	)

Net income to common shareholders — basic	$	158,124		$	53,511		$	277,196		$	107,495
Net income to common shareholders—basic													$	113,582		$	133,902		$	390,759		$	241,408

Diluted
Net income attributable to Noble Corporation	$	159,818		$	54,083		$	279,993		$	108,578		$	114,774		$	135,317		$	394,767		$	243,895
Earnings allocated to unvested share-based payment awards		(1,692	)		(572	)		(2,793	)		(1,082	)		(1,190	)		(1,412	)		(4,002	)		(2,481	)

Net income to common shareholders — diluted	$	158,126		$	53,511		$	277,200		$	107,496
Net income to common shareholders—diluted													$	113,584		$	133,905		$	390,765		$	241,414

Weighted average shares outstanding — basic		252,387			251,368			252,179			251,198
Weighted average shares outstanding—basic														252,657			251,580			252,339			251,327
Incremental shares issuable from assumed exercise of stock options		358			700			425			737			317			449			385			640

Weighted average shares outstanding — diluted		252,745			252,068			252,604			251,935
Weighted average shares outstanding—diluted														252,974			252,029			252,724			251,967

Weighted average unvested share-based payment awards		2,704			2,688			2,555			2,554			2,651			2,658			2,588			2,589

Earnings per share
Basic	$	0.63		$	0.21		$	1.10		$	0.43		$	0.45		$	0.53		$	1.55		$	0.96
Diluted	$	0.63		$	0.21		$	1.10		$	0.43		$	0.45		$	0.53		$	1.55		$	0.96

Only those items having a dilutive impact on our basic earnings per share are included in diluted earnings per share. At ~~June~~both September 30, 2012 and 2011, stock options totaling approximately ~~1.2~~1.1 million were excluded from the diluted earnings per share as they were not ~~dilutive as compared to 0.7 million at June 30, 2011.~~dilutive.

Note 4 — Property and Equipment

Property and equipment, at cost, as of ~~June~~September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011 consisted of the following:


	June 30,		December 31,		September 30,		December 31,
	2012		2011		2012		2011
Drilling equipment and facilities	$	12,572,630	$	10,974,943	$	13,449,855	$	10,974,943
Construction in progress		3,289,005		4,367,750		2,991,487		4,367,750
Other		193,533		197,485		196,284		197,485

	$	16,055,168	$	15,540,178	$	16,637,626	$	15,540,178

Capital expenditures, including capitalized interest, totaled ~~$665 million~~$1.2 billion and ~~$1.4~~$2.0 billion for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively. Capital expenditures for the first nine months of 2012 consisted of the following:

$~~162~~441 million for newbuild construction;

$~~327~~548 million for major projects, including ~~$34~~$50 million in subsea related expenditures and ~~$24~~$29 million to upgrade two drillships currently operating in Brazil;

$99150 million for other capitalized expenditures, including upgrades and replacements to drilling equipment, ~~replacements and upgrades which~~that generally have a useful ~~lives~~life ranging from 3 to 5 years; and

$77108 million in capitalized interest.

NOBLE CORPORATION (NOBLE-SWISS) AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOBLE CORPORATION (NOBLE-CAYMAN) AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unless otherwise indicated, dollar amounts in tables are in thousands, except per share data)

Interest is capitalized on construction-in-progress at the weighted average cost of debt outstanding during the period of construction. Capitalized interest was ~~$36~~$31 million and ~~$77~~$108 million for the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2012, respectively, as compared to ~~$29~~$32 million and ~~$56~~$88 million for the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2011.

Note 5 — Loss on Impairment

During the second quarter of 2012, we determined that our submersible rig fleet, consisting of two cold stacked rigs, was partially impaired due to the declining market outlook for drilling services for this rig type. We estimated the fair value of the rigs based on the salvage value of the rigs and a recent transaction involving a similar unit owned by a peer company (Level 2 fair value measurement). Based on these estimates, we recognized a charge of approximately $13 million for the ~~three~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2012.

Also, during the second quarter of 2012, we determined that certain corporate assets were partially impaired due to a declining market for, and the potential disposal of, the assets. We estimated the fair value of the asset based on recent transactions involving similar units in the market (Level 2 fair value measurement). Based on these estimates, we recognized a charge of approximately $5 million for the ~~three~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2012.

Note 6 — Gain on Contract Settlements/Extinguishments, net

During the second quarter of 2012, we received approximately $5 million from the settlement of a claim relating to theNoble David Tinsley, which had experienced a “punch-through” while being positioned on location in 2009. We had originally recorded a $17 million charge during 2009 related to this incident. Additionally, during the second quarter of 2012, we settled an action against certain vendors for damages sustained during Hurricane Ike. We recognized a net gain of approximately $28 million related to this settlement. We also resolved all outstanding matters with Anadarko Petroleum Company (“Anadarko”) related to the previously disclosed force majeure action, Hurricane Ike matters and receivables relating to theNoble Amos Runner ~~during the quarter.~~.

In January 2011, we announced the signing of a Memorandum of Understanding (“MOU”) with Petroleo Brasileiro S.A. (“Petrobras”) regarding operations in Brazil. Under the terms of the MOU, we agreed to substitute theNoble Phoenix, then under contract with Shell in Southeast Asia, for theNoble Muravlenko. In connection with the cancellation of the contract on theNoble Phoenix, we recognized a non-cash gain of approximately $52.5 million during the first quarter of 2011, which represented the unamortized fair value of the in-place contract at acquisition. As a result of the substitution, we reached a decision not to proceed with the previously announced reliability upgrade to theNoble Muravlenko that was scheduled to take place in ~~2013. As a result, we~~2013, and therefore, incurred a non-cash charge of approximately $32.6 million related to the termination of outstanding shipyard contracts. ~~We expect~~The substitution was completed during the ~~actual substitution to take place in the third~~fourth quarter of ~~2012 after the~~~~Noble Phoenix~~ ~~completes its shipyard work.~~2012.

In February 2011, the outstanding balances of the Bully joint venture credit facilities, which totaled $693 million, were repaid in full and the credit facilities terminated using a portion of the proceeds from our February 2011 debt offering and equity contributions from our joint venture partner. In addition, the related interest rate swaps were settled and terminated concurrent with the repayment and termination of the credit facilities. As a result of these transactions, we recognized a gain of approximately $1.3 million during the first quarter of 2011.

Note 7 — Receivables from Customers

In June 2010, a subsidiary of Frontier, which we acquired in July 2010, entered into a charter contract with a subsidiary of BP PLC (“BP”) for theSeillean with a term of a minimum of 100 days. The unit went on hire on July 23, 2010. In October 2010, BP initiated an arbitration proceeding against us claiming the contract was voidab initio, or never existed, due to a fundamental breach and has made other claims and ~~is demanding~~demanded that we reimburse the amounts already paid to us under the charter. We believe BP owes us the amounts due under the charter. The charter ~~contains~~contained a “hell or high water” provision requiring payment, and we believe we ~~have~~ satisfied our obligations under the charter. Outstanding receivables related to this charter totaled $35 million as of ~~June~~September 30, 2012. ~~While we~~We recently received a favorable ~~arbitration~~summary judgment ruling upholding the charter agreement and requiring BP to pay us the outstanding amounts, however, this matter has not been finally resolved ~~and these~~because the ruling allows BP the opportunity to make a damages claim under the charter agreement. These receivables continue to be classified as long-term and are included in “Other assets” on our Consolidated Balance ~~Sheet at June 30, 2012. We believe that if BP were to be successful in claiming the contract~~~~void ab initio~~~~, we may have an indemnity claim against the former shareholders of Frontier. We have put the former shareholders of Frontier on notice of this potential claim.~~Sheet. We can make no assurances as to the outcome of this dispute.

NOBLE CORPORATION (NOBLE-SWISS) AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOBLE CORPORATION (NOBLE-CAYMAN) AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unless otherwise indicated, dollar amounts in tables are in thousands, except per share data)

At ~~June~~September 30, 2012, we had receivables of approximately $14 million related to theNoble Max Smith, which are being disputed by our customer, Pemex Exploracion y Produccion (“Pemex”). These receivables have been classified as long-term and are included in “Other assets” on our Consolidated Balance ~~Sheet at June 30, 2012.~~Sheet. The disputed amount relates to lost revenues ~~due from Pemex~~ for downtime that occurred after our rig was damaged when one of Pemex’s supply boats collided with our rig. In January 2012, we filed a lawsuit against Pemex in Mexican court seeking recovery of these amounts. While we can make no assurances as to the outcome of this dispute, we believe we are entitled to the disputed amounts.

Note 8 — Debt

Total debt consisted of the following at ~~June~~September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011:


	June 30,		December 31,
	2012		2011		September 30, 2012		December 31, 2011
Wholly-owned debt instruments:
5.875% Senior Notes due 2013	$	299,966	$	299,949	$	299,975	$	299,949
7.375% Senior Notes due 2014		249,722		249,647		249,760		249,647
3.45% Senior Notes due 2015		350,000		350,000		350,000		350,000
3.05% Senior Notes due 2016		299,945		299,938		299,948		299,938
2.50% Senior Notes due 2017		299,836		—		299,844		—
7.50% Senior Notes due 2019		201,695		201,695		201,695		201,695
4.90% Senior Notes due 2020		498,840		498,783		498,870		498,783
4.625% Senior Notes due 2021		399,503		399,480		399,515		399,480
3.95% Senior Notes due 2022		399,054		—		399,075		—
6.20% Senior Notes due 2040		399,891		399,890		399,891		399,890
6.05% Senior Notes due 2041		397,598		397,582		397,605		397,582
5.25% Senior Notes due 2042		498,244		—		498,251		—
Credit facilities		150,000		975,000		345,000		975,000

Total long-term debt	$	4,444,294	$	4,071,964	$	4,639,429	$	4,071,964

During June 2012, we replaced our $575 million credit facility ~~which was~~ scheduled to mature in 2013, with a new $1.2 billion credit facility, which matures in 2017. ~~We continue to maintain~~The new facility, combined with our existing $600 million credit facility ~~which~~that matures in 2015, ~~which combined with our new facility,~~ gives us a total borrowing capacity under the two facilities (together referred to as the “Credit Facilities”) of $1.8 billion. The covenants and events of default under the Credit Facilities are substantially similar, and each facility contains a covenant that limits our ratio of debt to total tangible capitalization, as defined in the Credit Facilities, to 0.60. At ~~June~~September 30, 2012, our ratio of debt to total tangible capitalization was ~~0.35.~~less than 0.36. We were in compliance with all covenants under the Credit Facilities as of ~~June~~September 30, 2012.

The Credit Facilities provide us with the ability to issue up to $375 million in letters of credit in the aggregate. ~~While the~~The issuance of letters of credit does not increase our borrowings outstanding under the Credit Facilities, but it does reduce the amount available. At ~~June~~September 30, 2012, we had no letters of credit outstanding under the Credit Facilities.

During September 2012, we established a commercial paper program, which will allow us to issue up to $1.8 billion in unsecured commercial paper notes. Amounts issued under the commercial paper program are supported by the unused committed capacity under our Credit Facilities and, as such, are classified as long-term on our balance sheet. Subsequent to September 30, 2012, we began issuing notes under the program and had outstanding notes totaling $328 million as of October 31, 2012.

NOBLE CORPORATION (NOBLE-SWISS) AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOBLE CORPORATION (NOBLE-CAYMAN) AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unless otherwise indicated, dollar amounts in tables are in thousands, except per share data)

In February 2012, we issued, through our indirect wholly-owned subsidiary, Noble Holding International Limited (“NHIL”), $1.2 billion aggregate principal amount of senior notes in three separate tranches, with $300 million of 2.50% Senior Notes due 2017, $400 million of 3.95% Senior Notes due 2022, and $500 million of 5.25% Senior Notes due 2042. The weighted average coupon of all three tranches is 4.13%. The net proceeds of approximately $1.19 billion, after expenses, were primarily used to repay the then outstanding balance on our Credit Facilities.

~~NOBLE CORPORATION (NOBLE-SWISS) AND SUBSIDIARIES~~

~~NOBLE CORPORATION (NOBLE-CAYMAN) AND SUBSIDIARIES~~

~~NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS~~

~~(Unless otherwise indicated, dollar amounts in tables are in thousands, except per share data)~~

Our 5.875% Senior Notes mature during the second quarter of 2013. We anticipate using availability under our Credit Facilities to repay the outstanding balance; therefore, we ~~have continued~~continue to report the balance as long-term ~~on our June~~at September 30, ~~2012 Consolidated Balance Sheet.~~2012.

The indentures governing our outstanding senior unsecured notes contain covenants that place restrictions on certain merger and consolidation transactions, unless we are the surviving entity or the other party assumes the obligations under the indenture, and on the ability to sell or transfer all or substantially all of our assets. In addition, there are restrictions on incurring or assuming certain liens and sale and lease-back transactions. At ~~June~~September 30, 2012, we were in compliance with all our debt covenants. We continually monitor compliance with the covenants under our Credit Facilities and senior notes and, based on our expectations for 2012, expect to remain in compliance during the year.

Fair Value of Debt

Fair value represents the amount at which an instrument could be exchanged in a current transaction between willing parties. The estimated fair value of our senior notes was based on the quoted market prices for similar issues or on the current rates offered to us for debt of similar remaining maturities (Level 2 measurement). The following table presents the estimated fair value of our long-term debt as of ~~June~~September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011.


	June 30, 2012				December 31, 2011				September 30, 2012				December 31, 2011
	Carrying		Estimated		Carrying		Estimated		Carrying		Estimated		Carrying		Estimated
	Value		Fair Value		Value		Fair Value		Value		Fair Value		Value		Fair Value
Wholly-owned debt instruments
5.875% Senior Notes due 2013	$	299,966	$	312,362	$	299,949	$	317,586	$	299,975	$	308,949	$	299,949	$	317,586
7.375% Senior Notes due 2014		249,722		274,275		249,647		278,966		249,760		272,063		249,647		278,966
3.45% Senior Notes due 2015		350,000		367,465		350,000		363,571		350,000		369,921		350,000		363,571
3.05% Senior Notes due 2016		299,945		309,804		299,938		306,057		299,948		314,142		299,938		306,057
2.50% Senior Notes due 2017		299,836		303,649		—		—		299,844		309,118		—		—
7.50% Senior Notes due 2019		201,695		248,719		201,695		248,623		201,695		249,768		201,695		248,623
4.90% Senior Notes due 2020		498,840		538,532		498,783		531,437		498,870		559,783		498,783		531,437
4.625% Senior Notes due 2021		399,503		424,232		399,480		416,847		399,515		440,799		399,480		416,847
3.95% Senior Notes due 2022		399,054		404,017		—		—		399,075		420,137		—		—
6.20% Senior Notes due 2040		399,891		444,713		399,890		450,017		399,891		466,331		399,890		450,017
6.05% Senior Notes due 2041		397,598		436,205		397,582		443,308		397,605		461,733		397,582		443,308
5.25% Senior Notes due 2042		498,244		496,435		—		—		498,251		533,637		—		—
Credit Facilities		150,000		150,000		975,000		975,000		345,000		345,000		975,000		975,000

Total long-term debt	$	4,444,294	$	4,710,408	$	4,071,964	$	4,331,412	$	4,639,429	$	5,051,381	$	4,071,964	$	4,331,412

Note 9 — Income Taxes

At December 31, 2011, the reserves for uncertain tax positions totaled $118 million (net of related tax benefits of $8 million). At ~~June~~September 30, 2012, the reserves for uncertain tax positions totaled ~~$115~~$124 million (net of related tax benefits of $8$10 million). If the ~~June~~September 30, 2012 reserves are not realized, the provision for income taxes would be reduced by ~~$115~~$124 million in future periods.

NOBLE CORPORATION (NOBLE-SWISS) AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOBLE CORPORATION (NOBLE-CAYMAN) AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unless otherwise indicated, dollar amounts in tables are in thousands, except per share data)

It is possible that our existing liabilities related to our reserve for uncertain tax positions may increase or decrease in the next twelve months primarily due to the completion of open audits or the expiration of statutes of limitation. However, we cannot reasonably estimate a range of changes in our existing liabilities due to various uncertainties, such as the unresolved nature of various audits.

~~NOBLE CORPORATION (NOBLE-SWISS) AND SUBSIDIARIES~~

~~NOBLE CORPORATION (NOBLE-CAYMAN) AND SUBSIDIARIES~~

~~NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS~~

~~(Unless otherwise indicated, dollar amounts in tables are in thousands, except per share data)~~

Note 10 — Employee Benefit Plans

Pension costs include the following components:


	Three Months Ended June 30,												Three Months Ended September 30,
	2012						2011						2012						2011
	Non-U.S.			U.S.			Non-U.S.			U.S.			Non-U.S.			U.S.			Non-U.S.			U.S.
Service cost	$	1,111		$	2,375		$	1,153		$	2,152		$	1,072		$	2,431		$	1,141		$	2,152
Interest cost		1,350			2,164			1,440			2,143			1,317			2,196			1,433			2,143
Return on plan assets		(1,342	)		(2,793	)		(1,454	)		(2,768	)		(1,313	)		(2,793	)		(1,449	)		(2,768	)
Amortization of prior service cost		—			57			—			57			—			57			—			57
Amortization of transition obligation		—			—			19			—			—			—			19			—
Recognized net actuarial loss		201			1,793			123			843			199			1,885			123			844

Net pension expense	$	1,320		$	3,596		$	1,281		$	2,427		$	1,275		$	3,776		$	1,267		$	2,428


	Six Months Ended June 30,												Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2012						2011						2012						2011
	Non-U.S.			U.S.			Non-U.S.			U.S.			Non-U.S.			U.S.			Non-U.S.			U.S.
Service cost	$	2,234		$	4,806		$	2,246		$	4,304		$	3,306		$	7,237		$	3,387		$	6,456
Interest cost		2,708			4,360			2,823			4,286			4,025			6,556			4,256			6,428
Return on plan assets		(2,688	)		(5,586	)		(2,857	)		(5,536	)		(4,001	)		(8,379	)		(4,306	)		(8,304	)
Amortization of prior service cost		—			114			—			113			—			171			—			170
Amortization of transition obligation		—			—			37			—			—			—			56			—
Recognized net actuarial loss		401			3,678			243			1,687			600			5,563			366			2,531

Net pension expense	$	2,655		$	7,372		$	2,492		$	4,854		$	3,930		$	11,148		$	3,759		$	7,281

During the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2012, we made contributions to our pension plans totaling $6$3 million and ~~$10~~$13 million, respectively. We expect the funding to our non-U.S. and U.S. plans in 2012, subject to applicable law, to be approximately ~~$21~~$17 million.

Note 11 — Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities

We periodically enter into derivative instruments to manage our exposure to fluctuations in interest rates and foreign currency exchange rates. We have documented policies and procedures to monitor and control the use of derivative instruments. We do not engage in derivative transactions for speculative or trading purposes, nor are we a party to leveraged derivatives. During the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2011, we maintained certain foreign currency forward contracts that did not qualify under the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) standards for hedge accounting treatment and therefore, changes in fair values were recognized as either income or loss in our consolidated income statement.

For foreign currency forward contracts, hedge effectiveness is evaluated at inception based on the matching of critical terms between derivative contracts and the hedged item. For interest rate swaps, we evaluate all material terms between the swap and the underlying debt obligation, known in FASB standards as the “long-haul method.” Any change in fair value resulting from ineffectiveness is recognized immediately in earnings.

NOBLE CORPORATION (NOBLE-SWISS) AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOBLE CORPORATION (NOBLE-CAYMAN) AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unless otherwise indicated, dollar amounts in tables are in thousands, except per share data)

Cash Flow Hedges

Our North Sea and Brazil operations have a significant amount of their cash operating expenses payable in local currencies. To limit the potential risk of currency fluctuations, we have historically maintained short-term forward contracts settling monthly in their respective local currencies. At ~~June~~September 30, 2012, we had no outstanding derivative contracts.

~~NOBLE CORPORATION (NOBLE-SWISS) AND SUBSIDIARIES~~

~~NOBLE CORPORATION (NOBLE-CAYMAN) AND SUBSIDIARIES~~

~~NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS~~

~~(Unless otherwise indicated, dollar amounts in tables are in thousands, except per share data)~~

The balance of the net unrealized gain/(loss) related to our cash flow hedges included in “Accumulated other comprehensive loss” (“AOCL”) and related activity is as follows:


	Three Months Ended						Six Months Ended						Three Months Ended					Nine Months Ended
	June 30,						June 30,						September 30,					September 30,
	2012			2011			2012			2011			2012		2011			2012			2011
Net unrealized gain/(loss) at beginning of period	$	(644	)	$	1,766		$	(3,061	)	$	1,970		$	—	$	4,117		$	(3,061	)	$	1,970
Activity during period:
Settlement of foreign currency forward contracts during the period		644			(801	)		3,061			(1,382	)		—		(2,054	)		3,061			(1,604	)
Settlement of interest rate swaps during the period		—			—			—			(366	)		—		—			—			(366	)
Net unrealized gain on outstanding foreign currency forward contracts		—			3,152			—			3,895
Net unrealized loss on outstanding foreign currency forward contracts														—		(7,600	)		—			(5,537	)

Net unrealized gain/(loss) at end of period	$	—		$	4,117		$	—		$	4,117		$	—	$	(5,537	)	$	—		$	(5,537	)

Financial Statement Presentation

The following tables, together with Note 12, summarize the financial statement presentation and fair value of our derivative positions as of ~~June~~September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011:

Estimated fair value

Balance sheet
classification

June 30, 2012

December 31,
2011

Balance sheet classification

September 30,
2012

December 31,
2011

Liability derivatives

Cash flow hedges

Short-term foreign currency forward contracts

Other current liabilities

—

3,061

Other current liabilities

—

3,061

To supplement the fair value disclosures in Note 12, the following summarizes the recognized gains and losses of cash flow hedges and non-designated derivatives through AOCL or through “other income” for the three months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2012 and 2011:


	Gain/(loss) recognized through AOCL				Gain/(loss) reclassified from AOCL to “other income”					Gain/(loss) recognized through “other income”				Gain/(loss) recognized through AOCL					Gain/(loss) reclassified from AOCL to “other income”					Gain/(loss) recognized through “other income”
	2012		2011		2012			2011		2012		2011		2012		2011			2012		2011			2012		2011
Cash flow hedges
Foreign currency forward contracts	$	—	$	3,152	$	(644	)	$	801	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	(7,600	)	$	—	$	(2,054	)	$	—	$	—

NOBLE CORPORATION (NOBLE-SWISS) AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOBLE CORPORATION (NOBLE-CAYMAN) AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unless otherwise indicated, dollar amounts in tables are in thousands, except per share data)

To supplement the fair value disclosures in Note 12, the following summarizes the recognized gains and losses of cash flow hedges and non-designated derivatives through AOCL or through “other income” for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2012 and 2011:


	Gain/(loss) recognized through AOCL				Gain/(loss) reclassified from AOCL to “other income”					Gain/(loss) recognized through “other income”					Gain/(loss) recognized through AOCL					Gain/(loss) reclassified from AOCL to “other income”					Gain/(loss) recognized through “other income”
	2012		2011		2012			2011		2012		2011			2012		2011			2012		2011			2012		2011
Cash flow hedges
Foreign currency forward contracts	$	—	$	3,895	$	(3,061	)	$	1,382	$	—	$	—		$	—	$	(5,537	)	$	3,061	$	(1,604	)	$	—	$	—
Interest rate swaps																—		—			—		(366	)		—		—
Non-designated derivatives
Foreign currency forward contracts	$	—	$	—	$	—		$	—	$	—	$	(546	)	$	—	$	—		$	—	$	—		$	—	$	(546	)

Note 12 — Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The following table presents the carrying amount and estimated fair value of our financial instruments recognized at fair value on a recurring basis:


	June 30, 2012								December 31, 2011				September 30, 2012								December 31, 2011
			Estimated Fair Value Measurements												Estimated Fair Value Measurements
			Quoted		Significant										Quoted		Significant
			Prices in		Other		Significant								Prices in		Other		Significant
			Active		Observable		Unobservable								Active		Observable		Unobservable
	Carrying		Markets		Inputs		Inputs		Carrying		Estimated		Carrying		Markets		Inputs		Inputs		Carrying		Estimated
	Amount		(Level 1)		(Level 2)		(Level 3)		Amount		Fair Value		Amount		(Level 1)		(Level 2)		(Level 3)		Amount		Fair Value
Assets -
Assets—
Marketable securities	$	5,247	$	5,247	$	—	$	—	$	4,701	$	4,701	$	5,745	$	5,745	$	—	$	—	$	4,701	$	4,701
Liabilities -
Liabilities—
Foreign currency forward contracts	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	3,061	$	3,061	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	3,061	$	3,061

At the time of valuation, the derivative instruments were valued using actively quoted prices and quotes obtained from the counterparties to the derivative instruments. Our cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable and accounts payable are by their nature short-term. As a result, the carrying values included in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets approximate fair value.

Note 13 — Commitments and Contingencies

TheNoble Homer Ferrington was under contract with a subsidiary of ExxonMobil Corporation (“ExxonMobil”), which entered into an assignment agreement with BP for a ~~two well~~two-well farmout of the rig in Libya after successfully drilling two wells with the rig for ExxonMobil. In August 2010, BP attempted to terminate the assignment agreement claiming that the rig was not in the required ~~condition.~~condition, and ExxonMobil ~~has~~ informed us that we must look to BP for payment of the dayrate during the assignment period. In August 2010, we initiated arbitration proceedings under the drilling contract against both BP and ExxonMobil. We do not believe BP had the right to terminate the assignment agreement and believe the rig was ~~fully~~ ready to operate under the drilling contract. The rig operated under farmout arrangements from March 2011 to the conclusion of the contract in the second quarter of 2012. We believe we are owed dayrate by either or both of these clients. The operating dayrate was approximately $538,000 per day for the work in Libya. The arbitration process is proceeding, and we intend to vigorously pursue these claims. As a result of the uncertainties noted above, we have not recognized any revenue during the assignment period and the matter could have a material positive effect on our results of operations or cash flows in the period the matter is resolved should the arbitration panel ultimately rule in our favor.

NOBLE CORPORATION (NOBLE-SWISS) AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOBLE CORPORATION (NOBLE-CAYMAN) AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unless otherwise indicated, dollar amounts in tables are in thousands, except per share data)

In August 2007, we entered into a drilling contract with Marathon Oil Company (“Marathon”) for theNoble Jim Day to operate in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico. On January 1, 2011, Marathon provided notice that it was terminating the contract. Marathon’s stated reason for the termination was that the rig had not been accepted by Marathon by December 31, 2010, and Marathon also maintained that a force majeure condition existed under the contract. The contract contained a provision allowing Marathon to terminate if the rig had not commenced operations by December 31, 2010. We believe the rig was ready to commence operations and should have been accepted by Marathon. The contract term was for four years. No revenue has been recognized under this contract. We have contracted the rig for much of the original term with other customers. In March 2011, we filed suit in Texas State District Court against Marathon seeking damages for its ~~actions, and the~~actions. The suit is ~~proceeding.~~proceeding and is currently in the discovery phase. We cannot provide assurance as to the outcome of this lawsuit.

We are from time to time a party to various lawsuits that are incidental to our operations in which the claimants seek an unspecified amount of monetary damages for personal injury, including injuries purportedly resulting from exposure to asbestos on drilling rigs and associated facilities. At ~~June~~September 30, 2012, there were 2629 asbestos related lawsuits in which we are one of many defendants. These lawsuits have been filed in the United States in the states of Louisiana, Mississippi and Texas. We intend to vigorously defend against the litigation. We do not believe the ultimate resolution of these matters will have a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

We are a defendant in certain claims and litigation arising out of operations in the ordinary course of business, including certain disputes with customers over receivables discussed in Note 7, the resolution of which, in the opinion of management, will not be material to our financial position, results of operations or cash flows. There is inherent risk in any litigation or dispute and no assurance can be given as to the outcome of these claims.

We operate in a number of countries throughout the world and our income tax returns filed in those jurisdictions are subject to review and examination by tax authorities within those jurisdictions. The U.S. Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) has completed its audit examination of our 2008 U.S. tax return and proposed adjustments and deficiencies with respect to certain items that were reported by us for the 2008 tax year. We believe that we have accurately reported all amounts in our 2008 tax return, and have filed protests with the IRS Office of Appeals contesting the examination team’s proposed adjustments. A conference has been scheduled in December 2012 to discuss these items. We intend to vigorously defend our reported positions. Our 2009 tax return is under audit, and we expect to receive additional Information Document Requests in the coming months. ~~In addition,~~During the third quarter, a U.S. subsidiary of Frontier ~~is also under~~concluded its audit bywith the IRS for its 2007 and 2008 tax ~~returns.~~returns, resulting in no change to income tax expense. Furthermore, we are currently contesting several non-U.S. tax assessments and may contest future assessments when we disagree with those assessments based on the technical merits of the positions established at the time of the filing of the tax return. We believe the ultimate resolution of the outstanding assessments, for which we have not made any accrual, will not have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial statements. We recognize uncertain tax positions that we believe have a greater than 50 percent likelihood of being sustained. We cannot predict or provide assurance as to the ultimate outcome of the existing or future assessments.

Our Mexican income tax returns have been examined for the 2002 through 2007 periods and audit claims have been assessed for approximately ~~$297~~$326 million (including interest and penalties). During 2011, we received from the Regional Chamber of the Federal Tax Court adverse decisions with respect to approximately $5$6 million in assessments related to depreciation deductions, which we are appealing. We are also contesting all other assessments in Mexico. Tax authorities in Mexico and other jurisdictions may issue additional assessments or pursue legal actions as a result of tax audits and we cannot predict or provide assurance as to the ultimate outcome of such assessments and legal actions.

Additional audit claims of approximately ~~$75~~$91 million attributable to income, customs and other business taxes have been assessed against us in other jurisdictions. We have contested, or intend to contest, these assessments, including through litigation if necessary, and we believe the ultimate resolution, for which we have not made any accrual, will not have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial statements.

NOBLE CORPORATION (NOBLE-SWISS) AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOBLE CORPORATION (NOBLE-CAYMAN) AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unless otherwise indicated, dollar amounts in tables are in thousands, except per share data)

We maintain certain insurance coverage against specified marine perils which includes physical damage and loss of hire. Damage caused by hurricanes has negatively impacted the energy insurance market, resulting in more restrictive and expensive coverage for U.S. named windstorm perils. Accordingly, we have elected to significantly reduce the named windstorm insurance on our rigs operating in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico. Presently we insure theNoble Jim Thompson,Noble Amos Runner andNoble Driller for “total loss only” when caused by a named windstorm. Our customer assumes the risk of loss on theNoble Bully I due to a named windstorm event up to $450 million per occurrence pursuant to the terms of the drilling contract relating to such vessel, provided that we are responsible for the first $25 million per occurrence for such named windstorm events. The remaining rigs in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico are self-insured for named windstorm perils. Our rigs located in the Mexico portion of the Gulf of Mexico remain covered by commercial insurance for windstorm damage. In addition, we maintain physical damage deductibles on our rigs ranging from $15 million to $25 million per occurrence, depending on location. The loss of hire coverage applies only to our rigs operating under contract with a dayrate equal to or greater than $200,000 a day and is subject to a 45-day waiting period for each unit and each occurrence.

Although we maintain insurance in the geographic areas in which we operate, pollution, reservoir damage and environmental risks generally are not fully insurable. Our insurance policies and contractual rights to indemnity may not adequately cover our losses or may have exclusions of coverage for some losses. We do not have insurance coverage or rights to indemnity for all risks, including loss of hire insurance on most of the rigs in our fleet. Uninsured exposures may include expatriate activities prohibited by U.S. laws and regulations, radiation hazards, certain loss or damage to property on board our rigs and losses relating to shore-based terrorist acts or strikes. If a significant accident or other event occurs and is not fully covered by insurance or contractual indemnity, it could materially adversely affect our financial position, results of operations or cash flows. Additionally, there can be no assurance that those parties with contractual obligations to indemnify us will necessarily be financially able to indemnify us against all these risks.

In January 2012, we were assessed a fine by the Brazilian government in the amount of R$1.8 million (approximately ~~$900,000)~~$887,000) in connection with the inadvertent discharge of drilling fluid from one of our rigs offshore Brazil in September 2011. We have accepted the assessment.

In October 2011, we were assessed a fine by the Brazilian government in the amount of R$238,000 (approximately ~~$120,000)~~$117,000) in connection with the inadvertent discharge of drilling fluid from one of our rigs offshore Brazil in November 2010. We have accepted the assessment.

We carry protection and indemnity insurance covering marine third party liability exposures, which also includes coverage for employer’s liability resulting from personal injury to our offshore drilling crews. Our protection and indemnity policy currently has a standard deductible of $10 million per occurrence, with maximum liability coverage of $750 million.

In connection with our capital expenditure program, we had outstanding commitments, including shipyard and purchase commitments of approximately ~~$3.1~~$3.0 billion at ~~June~~September 30, 2012.

We have entered into agreements with certain of our executive officers, as well as certain other employees. These agreements become effective upon a change of control of Noble-Swiss (within the meaning set forth in the agreements) or a termination of employment in connection with or in anticipation of a change of control, and remain effective for three years thereafter. These agreements provide for compensation and certain other benefits under such circumstances.

NOBLE CORPORATION (NOBLE-SWISS) AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOBLE CORPORATION (NOBLE-CAYMAN) AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unless otherwise indicated, dollar amounts in tables are in thousands, except per share data)

Nigerian Operations

During the fourth quarter of 2007, our Nigerian subsidiary received letters from the Nigerian Maritime Administration and Safety Agency (“NIMASA”) seeking to collect a ~~two~~2 percent surcharge on contract amounts under contracts performed by “vessels,” within the meaning of Nigeria’s cabotage laws, engaged in the Nigerian coastal shipping trade. Although we do not believe that these laws apply to our ownership of drilling units, NIMASA is seeking to apply a provision of the Nigerian cabotage laws (which became effective on May 1, 2004) to our offshore drilling units by considering these units to be “vessels” within the meaning of those laws and therefore subject to the surcharge, which is imposed only upon “vessels.” Our offshore drilling units are not engaged in the Nigerian coastal shipping trade and are not in our view “vessels” within the meaning of Nigeria’s cabotage laws. In January 2008, we filed an originating summons against NIMASA and the Minister of Transportation in the Federal High Court of Lagos, Nigeria seeking, among other things, a declaration that our drilling operations do not constitute “coastal trade” or “cabotage” within the meaning of Nigeria’s cabotage laws and that our offshore drilling units are not “vessels” within the meaning of those laws. In February 2009, NIMASA filed suit against us in the Federal High Court of Nigeria seeking collection of the cabotage surcharge. In August 2009, the court issued a favorable ruling in response to our originating summons stating that drilling operations do not fall within the cabotage laws and that drilling rigs are not vessels for purposes of those laws. The court also issued an injunction against the defendants prohibiting their interference with our drilling rigs or drilling operations. NIMASA has appealed the court’s ruling, although the court dismissed NIMASA’s lawsuit filed against us in February 2009. We intend to take all further appropriate legal action to resist the application of Nigeria’s cabotage laws to our drilling units. The outcome of any such legal action and the extent to which we may ultimately be responsible for the surcharge is uncertain. If it is ultimately determined that offshore drilling units constitute vessels within the meaning of the Nigerian cabotage laws, we may be required to pay the surcharge and comply with other aspects of the Nigerian cabotage laws, which could adversely affect our operations in Nigerian waters and require us to incur additional costs of compliance.

NIMASA had previously informed the Nigerian Content Division of its position that we were not in compliance with the cabotage laws. The Nigerian Content Division makes determinations of companies’ compliance with applicable local content regulations for purposes of government contracting, including contracting for services in connection with oil and gas concessions where the Nigerian national oil company is a partner. The Nigerian Content Division had previously barred us from participating in new tenders as a result of NIMASA’s allegations, although the Division reversed its actions based on the favorable Federal High Court ruling. However, no assurance can be given with respect to our ability to bid for future work in Nigeria until our dispute with NIMASA is resolved.

As previously disclosed, in November 2010 we finalized settlements with the SEC and the Department of Justice as the result of an internal investigation of the legality under the United States Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (“FCPA”) and local laws of certain reimbursement payments made by our Nigerian affiliate to our customs agents in Nigeria. In January 2011, a subsidiary of Noble-Swiss resolved an investigation by the Nigerian Economic and Financial Crimes Commission and the Nigerian Attorney General Office into these same activities. Any additional investigation by these or other agencies could damage our reputation and result in substantial fines, sanctions, civil and/or criminal penalties and curtailment of operations in certain jurisdictions and might adversely affect our business, results of operations or financial condition. Further, resolving any additional investigations could be expensive and consume significant time and attention of our senior management.

Under the Nigerian Industrial Training Fund Act of 2004, as amended, (the “Act”), Nigerian companies with five or more employees must contribute annually one percent of their payroll to the Industrial Training Fund (“ITF”) established under the Act to be used for the training of Nigerian nationals with a view towards generating a pool of indigenously trained manpower. We have not paid this amount on our expatriate workers employed by our non-Nigerian employment entity in the past as we did not believe the contribution obligation was applicable to them. In October 2012, we received a demand from the ITF for payments going back to 2004 and associated penalties in respect of these expatriate employees. We do not believe that we owe the amount claimed and that, in the event we were to have any liability, it would be for an immaterial amount. We continue to investigate the matter and are also engaged in discussions with the ITF to resolve the issue.

Note 14 — Segment and Related Information

We report our contract drilling operations as a single reportable ~~segment:~~segment, Contract Drilling ~~Services. The consolidation of our contract drilling operations into one reportable segment is attributable to~~Services, which reflects how we manage our business, and the fact that all of our drilling fleet is dependent upon the worldwide oil and gas industry. The mobile offshore drilling units comprising our offshore rig fleet operate in a single, global market for contract drilling services and are often redeployed globally in response to changing demands of our customers, which consist largely of major non-U.S. and government owned/controlled oil and gas companies throughout the world. Our Contract Drilling Services segment currently conducts contract drilling operations principally in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico, Mexico, Brazil, the North Sea, the Mediterranean, West Africa, the Middle East, India, Australia and the Asian Pacific.

NOBLE CORPORATION (NOBLE-SWISS) AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOBLE CORPORATION (NOBLE-CAYMAN) AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unless otherwise indicated, dollar amounts in tables are in thousands, except per share data)

We evaluate the performance of our operating segment primarily based on operating revenues and net income. Summarized financial information of our reportable segments for the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2012 and 2011 for Noble-Swiss and Noble-Cayman are shown in the following table. The “Other” column includes results of labor contract drilling services in Canada and Alaska, as well as corporate related items.


	Noble-Swiss																		Noble-Swiss
	Three Months Ended June 30,																		Three Months Ended September 30,
	2012									2011									2012									2011
	Contract									Contract									Contract									Contract
	Drilling									Drilling									Drilling									Drilling
	Services			Other			Total			Services			Other			Total			Services			Other			Total			Services			Other			Total
Revenues from external customers	$	878,372		$	20,551		$	898,923		$	612,845		$	15,152		$	627,997		$	860,315		$	23,717		$	884,032		$	719,546		$	18,356		$	737,902
Depreciation and amortization		180,112			3,503			183,615			159,843			3,276			163,119			191,638			3,449			195,087			162,837			3,376			166,213
Segment operating income / (loss)		246,161			(1,666	)		244,495			77,309			1,736			79,045
Segment operating income																				173,285			5,639			178,924			159,588			3,994			163,582
Interest expense, net of amount capitalized		(105	)		(20,547	)		(20,652	)		(683	)		(14,146	)		(14,829	)		(121	)		(25,514	)		(25,635	)		(122	)		(11,408	)		(11,530	)
Income tax (provision) / benefit		(51,098	)		4,742			(46,356	)		(11,418	)		1,910			(9,508	)		(28,307	)		3,145			(25,162	)		(18,380	)		766			(17,614	)
Segment profit / (loss)		178,094			(18,276	)		159,818			64,939			(10,856	)		54,083			130,983			(16,209	)		114,774			141,199			(5,882	)		135,317
Total assets (at end of period)		13,483,083			552,933			14,036,016			12,046,536			391,702			12,438,238			13,983,223			477,183			14,460,406			12,472,018			479,515			12,951,533


	Noble-Cayman																		Noble-Cayman
	Three Months Ended June 30,																		Three Months Ended September 30,
	2012									2011									2012									2011
	Contract									Contract									Contract									Contract
	Drilling									Drilling									Drilling									Drilling
	Services			Other			Total			Services			Other			Total			Services			Other			Total			Services			Other			Total
Revenues from external customers	$	878,372		$	20,551		$	898,923		$	612,845		$	15,152		$	627,997		$	860,315		$	23,717		$	884,032		$	719,546		$	18,356		$	737,902
Depreciation and amortization		180,112			2,991			183,103			159,843			2,793			162,636			191,638			2,957			194,595			162,837			2,882			165,719
Segment operating income		248,065			8,783			256,848			83,833			9,209			93,042			178,185			17,502			195,687			168,509			14,387			182,896
Interest expense, net of amount capitalized		(105	)		(20,547	)		(20,652	)		(683	)		(14,146	)		(14,829	)		(121	)		(25,514	)		(25,635	)		(122	)		(11,408	)		(11,530	)
Income tax (provision) / benefit		(51,098	)		5,121			(45,977	)		(11,418	)		2,261			(9,157	)		(28,307	)		3,523			(24,784	)		(18,380	)		1,082			(17,298	)
Segment profit / (loss)		179,998			(7,028	)		172,970			71,463			(2,645	)		68,818			135,883			(4,160	)		131,723			150,120			5,594			155,714
Total assets (at end of period)		13,483,083			514,241			13,997,324			12,046,536			353,149			12,399,685			13,983,223			440,287			14,423,510			12,472,018			439,780			12,911,798

NOBLE CORPORATION (NOBLE-SWISS) AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOBLE CORPORATION (NOBLE-CAYMAN) AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unless otherwise indicated, dollar amounts in tables are in thousands, except per share data)


	Noble-Swiss																		Noble-Swiss
	Six Months Ended June 30,																		Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2012									2011									2012									2011
	Contract									Contract									Contract									Contract
	Drilling									Drilling									Drilling									Drilling
	Services			Other			Total			Services			Other			Total			Services			Other			Total			Services			Other			Total
Revenues from external customers	$	1,659,615		$	36,998		$	1,696,613		$	1,177,499		$	29,386		$	1,206,885		$	2,519,930		$	60,715		$	2,580,645		$	1,897,045		$	47,742		$	1,944,787
Depreciation and amortization		348,060			6,632			354,692			314,731			6,510			321,241			539,698			10,081			549,779			477,568			9,886			487,454
Segment operating income		386,428			1,710			388,138			162,025			3,284			165,309			559,713			7,349			567,062			321,613			7,278			328,891
Interest expense, net of amount capitalized		(194	)		(30,954	)		(31,148	)		(1,768	)		(32,102	)		(33,870	)		(315	)		(56,468	)		(56,783	)		(1,890	)		(43,510	)		(45,400	)
Income tax (provision) / benefit		(73,698	)		5,753			(67,945	)		(30,281	)		5,414			(24,867	)		(102,005	)		8,898			(93,107	)		(48,661	)		6,180			(42,481	)
Segment profit / (loss)		303,578			(23,585	)		279,993			131,819			(23,241	)		108,578			434,561			(39,794	)		394,767			272,488			(28,593	)		243,895
Total assets (at end of period)		13,483,083			552,933			14,036,016			12,046,536			391,702			12,438,238			13,983,223			477,183			14,460,406			12,472,018			479,515			12,951,533


	Noble-Cayman																		Noble-Cayman
	Six Months Ended June 30,																		Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2012									2011									2012									2011
	Contract									Contract									Contract									Contract
	Drilling									Drilling									Drilling									Drilling
	Services			Other			Total			Services			Other			Total			Services			Other			Total			Services			Other			Total
Revenues from external customers	$	1,659,615		$	36,998		$	1,696,613		$	1,177,499		$	29,386		$	1,206,885		$	2,519,930		$	60,715		$	2,580,645		$	1,897,045		$	47,742		$	1,944,787
Depreciation and amortization		348,060			5,616			353,676			314,731			5,560			320,291			539,698			8,573			548,271			477,568			8,442			486,010
Segment operating income		393,197			21,779			414,976			174,080			18,408			192,488			571,382			39,281			610,663			342,589			32,795			375,384
Interest expense, net of amount capitalized		(194	)		(30,954	)		(31,148	)		(1,768	)		(32,102	)		(33,870	)		(315	)		(56,468	)		(56,783	)		(1,890	)		(43,510	)		(45,400	)
Income tax (provision) / benefit		(73,698	)		6,510			(67,188	)		(30,281	)		6,099			(24,182	)		(102,005	)		10,033			(91,972	)		(48,661	)		7,181			(41,480	)
Segment profit / (loss)		310,347			(2,725	)		307,622			143,874			(7,396	)		136,478			446,230			(6,885	)		439,345			293,464			(1,272	)		292,192
Total assets (at end of period)		13,483,083			514,241			13,997,324			12,046,536			353,149			12,399,685			13,983,223			440,287			14,423,510			12,472,018			439,780			12,911,798

Note 15 — Accounting Pronouncements

In May 2011, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2011-04, which amends FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 820, “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures.” This amended guidance clarifies the wording used to describe many of the requirements in accounting literature for measuring fair value and for disclosing information about fair value measurements. The goal of the amendment is to create consistency between the United States and international accounting standards. The guidance is effective for annual and interim reporting periods beginning on or after December 15, 2011. Our adoption of this guidance did not have a material impact on our financial condition, results of operations, cash flows or financial disclosures.

In June 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-05, which amends ASC Topic 220, “Comprehensive Income.” This ASU allows an entity to present the total of comprehensive income, the components of net income, and the components of other comprehensive income either in a single continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two separate but consecutive statements. The amendment no longer allows an entity to show changes to other comprehensive income solely through the statement of equity. For publicly traded entities, the guidance is effective for annual and interim reporting periods beginning on or after December 15, 2011. In December 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-12, which defers only those changes in ASU 2011-05 that relate to the presentation of reclassification adjustments. Our adoption of this guidance did not have a material impact on our financial condition, results of operations, cash flows or financial disclosures.

NOBLE CORPORATION (NOBLE-SWISS) AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOBLE CORPORATION (NOBLE-CAYMAN) AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unless otherwise indicated, dollar amounts in tables are in thousands, except per share data)

Note 16 — Net Change in Other Assets and Liabilities

The net effect of changes in other assets and liabilities on cash flows from operating activities is as follows:


	Noble-Swiss						Noble-Cayman						Noble-Swiss						Noble-Cayman
	Six months ended						Six months ended						Nine months ended						Nine months ended
	June 30,						June 30,						September 30,						September 30,
	2012			2011			2012			2011			2012			2011			2012			2011
Accounts receivable	$	(87,244	)	$	(122,605	)	$	(87,244	)	$	(122,572	)	$	(163,051	)	$	(213,747	)	$	(163,051	)	$	(213,747	)
Other current assets		(82,590	)		(55,141	)		(85,357	)		(46,895	)		(58,303	)		(23,900	)		(59,764	)		(20,578	)
Other assets		(10,452	)		(13,344	)		(10,454	)		(15,821	)		(25,543	)		(37,171	)		(25,546	)		(39,649	)
Accounts payable		9,776			(17,020	)		8,804			(17,050	)		29,470			(23,744	)		29,353			(23,654	)
Other current liabilities		(2,282	)		1,544			(1,997	)		(11,283	)		76,035			21,281			79,436			13,655
Other liabilities		33,608			16,030			33,608			16,004			70,382			33,566			64,215			33,540

	$	(139,184	)	$	(190,536	)	$	(142,640	)	$	(197,617	)	$	(71,010	)	$	(243,715	)	$	(75,357	)	$	(250,433	)

Note 17 — Guarantees of Registered Securities

Noble-Cayman, or one or more subsidiaries of Noble-Cayman, are a co-issuer or guarantor or otherwise obligated as of ~~June~~September 30, 2012 as follows:


	Issuer
Notes	(Co-Issuer(s))	Guarantor(s)
$300 million 5.875% Senior Notes due 2013	Noble-Cayman	Noble Drilling Corporation (“NDC”);
		NHIL
$250 million 7.375% Senior Notes due 2014	NHIL	Noble-Cayman
$350 million 3.45% Senior Notes due 2015	NHIL	Noble-Cayman
$300 million 3.05% Senior Notes due 2016	NHIL	Noble-Cayman
$300 million 2.50% Senior Notes due 2017	NHIL	Noble-Cayman
$202 million 7.50% Senior Notes due 2019	~~NDC~~NDC;	~~Noble-Cayman~~Noble-Cayman;
	Noble Drilling Services 6 LLC (“NDS6”)	Noble Holding (U.S.) Corporation (“NHC”);
		Noble Drilling Holding LLC (“NDH”)
$500 million 4.90% Senior Notes due 2020	NHIL	Noble-Cayman
$400 million 4.625% Senior Notes due 2021	NHIL	Noble-Cayman
$400 million 3.95% Senior Notes due 2022	NHIL	Noble-Cayman
$400 million 6.20% Senior Notes due 2040	NHIL	Noble-Cayman
$400 million 6.05% Senior Notes due 2041	NHIL	Noble-Cayman
$500 million 5.25% Senior Notes due 2042	NHIL	Noble-Cayman

The following consolidating financial statements of Noble-Cayman, NHC and NDH combined, NDC, NHIL, NDS6 and all other subsidiaries present investments in both consolidated and unconsolidated affiliates using the equity method of accounting.

NOBLE CORPORATION (NOBLE-CAYMAN) AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING BALANCE SHEET

~~June~~September 30, 2012

(in thousands)


													Other
													Non-guarantor
	Noble-		NHC and NDH										Subsidiaries			Consolidating
	Cayman		Combined			NDC			NHIL		NDS6		of Noble			Adjustments			Total			Noble- Cayman		NHC and NDH Combined			NDC			NHIL		NDS6		Other Non-guarantor Subsidiaries of Noble			Consolidating Adjustments			Total
ASSETS
Current assets
Cash and cash equivalents	$	95	$	331		$	—		$	4	$	—	$	267,440		$	—		$	267,870		$	—	$	435		$	—		$	19	$	—	$	213,227		$	—		$	213,681
Accounts receivable		—		15,595			3,325			—		—		674,613			—			693,533			—		10,560			1,584			—		—		779,264			—			791,408
Taxes receivable		—		4,566			—			—		—		93,179			—			97,745			—		25,502			—			—		—		92,852			—			118,354
Prepaid expenses		—		502			9			—		—		76,119			—			76,630			—		444			20			—		—		61,072			—			61,536
Short-term notes receivable from affiliates		—		119,476			—			—		—		234,992			(354,468	)		—			—		119,476			—			—		—		252,138			(371,614	)		—
Accounts receivable from affiliates		761,630		130,097			973,381			563,640		39,829		5,340,324			(7,808,901	)		—			852,466		153,146			970,918			502,287		42,675		5,570,469			(8,091,961	)		—
Other current assets		516		641			196			—		—		141,188			—			142,541			375		640			196			—		—		110,222			—			111,433

Total current assets		762,241		271,208			976,911			563,644		39,829		6,827,855			(8,163,369	)		1,278,319			852,841		310,203			972,718			502,306		42,675		7,079,244			(8,463,575	)		1,296,412

Property and equipment, at cost		—		2,326,256			74,856			—		—		13,618,432			—			16,019,544			—		2,616,145			75,591			—		—		13,910,239			—			16,601,975
Accumulated depreciation		—		(285,259	)		(56,410	)		—		—		(3,284,603	)		—			(3,626,272	)		—		(300,637	)		(57,520	)		—		—		(3,460,572	)		—			(3,818,729	)

Property and equipment, net		—		2,040,997			18,446			—		—		10,333,829			—			12,393,272			—		2,315,508			18,071			—		—		10,449,667			—			12,783,246

Notes receivable from affiliates		3,816,463		1,206,000			—			3,524,814		479,107		2,578,007			(11,604,391	)		—			3,816,463		1,206,000			—			3,524,814		479,107		2,171,875			(11,198,259	)		—
Investments in affiliates		7,322,022		9,407,807			3,418,778			7,016,530		2,219,318		—			(29,384,455	)		—			7,484,253		9,078,691			3,412,070			7,188,893		2,348,479		—			(29,512,386	)		—
Other assets		6,745		554			435			27,584		820		289,595			—			325,733			6,296		535			654			26,740		790		308,837			—			343,852

Total assets	$	11,907,471	$	12,926,566		$	4,414,570		$	11,132,572	$	2,739,074	$	20,029,286		$	(49,152,215	)	$	13,997,324		$	12,159,853	$	12,910,937		$	4,403,513		$	11,242,753	$	2,871,051	$	20,009,623		$	(49,174,220	)	$	14,423,510

LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
Current liabilities
Short-term notes payables from affiliates	$	73,168	$	51,054		$	110,770		$	—	$	—	$	119,476		$	(354,468	)	$	—		$	90,314	$	51,054		$	110,770		$	—	$	—	$	119,476		$	(371,614	)	$	—
Accounts payable		—		3,141			555			—		—		272,702			—			276,398			—		2,720			644			—		—		294,605			—			297,969
Accrued payroll and related costs		—		4,530			7,223			—		—		105,284			—			117,037			—		5,478			7,857			—		—		120,675			—			134,010
Accounts payable to affiliates		900,919		4,342,182			3,741			138,782		53,235		2,370,042			(7,808,901	)		—			848,091		4,628,552			4,593			152,009		68,819		2,389,897			(8,091,961	)		—
Interest payable		1,548		—			—			67,248		4,412		—			—			73,208			6,093		—			—			17,128		630		—			—			23,851
Taxes payable		—		9,595			—			—		—		75,298			—			84,893			—		9,007			—			—		—		117,105			—			126,112
Other current liabilities		—		—			241			—		—		108,435			—			108,676			—		—			240			—		—		144,027			—			144,267

Total current liabilities		975,635		4,410,502			122,530			206,030		57,647		3,051,237			(8,163,369	)		660,212			944,498		4,696,811			124,104			169,137		69,449		3,185,785			(8,463,575	)		726,209

Long-term debt		449,966		—			—			3,792,633		201,695		—			—			4,444,294			644,975		—			—			3,792,759		201,695		—			—			4,639,429
Notes payable to affiliates		2,855,394		1,039,500			—			975,000		1,342,000		5,392,497			(11,604,391	)		—			2,840,287		648,475			—			975,000		1,342,000		5,392,497			(11,198,259	)		—
Deferred income taxes		—		—			15,731			—		—		222,314			—			238,045			—		—			15,731			—		—		220,120			—			235,851
Other liabilities		19,929		17,361			—			—		—		269,107			—			306,397			19,929		17,475			—			—		—		316,191			—			353,595

Total liabilities		4,300,924		5,467,363			138,261			4,973,663		1,601,342		8,935,155			(19,767,760	)		5,648,948			4,449,689		5,362,761			139,835			4,936,896		1,613,144		9,114,593			(19,661,834	)		5,955,084

Commitments and contingencies

Total shareholder equity		7,606,547		7,459,203			4,276,309			6,158,909		1,137,732		10,352,302			(29,384,455	)		7,606,547			7,710,164		7,548,176			4,263,678			6,305,857		1,257,907		10,136,768			(29,512,386	)		7,710,164
Noncontrolling interest		—		—			—			—		—		741,829			—			741,829			—		—			—			—		—		758,262			—			758,262

Total equity		7,606,547		7,459,203			4,276,309			6,158,909		1,137,732		11,094,131			(29,384,455	)		8,348,376			7,710,164		7,548,176			4,263,678			6,305,857		1,257,907		10,895,030			(29,512,386	)		8,468,426

Total liabilities and equity	$	11,907,471	$	12,926,566		$	4,414,570		$	11,132,572	$	2,739,074	$	20,029,286		$	(49,152,215	)	$	13,997,324		$	12,159,853	$	12,910,937		$	4,403,513		$	11,242,753	$	2,871,051	$	20,009,623		$	(49,174,220	)	$	14,423,510

NOBLE CORPORATION (NOBLE-CAYMAN) AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING BALANCE SHEET

December 31, 2011

(in thousands)


													Other
													Non-guarantor
	Noble-		NHC and NDH										Subsidiaries			Consolidating
	Cayman		Combined			NDC			NHIL		NDS6		of Noble			Adjustments			Total			Noble- Cayman		NHC and NDH Combined			NDC			NHIL		NDS6		Other Non-guarantor Subsidiaries of Noble			Consolidating Adjustments			Total
ASSETS
Current assets
Cash and cash equivalents	$	146	$	385		$	—		$	—	$	—	$	234,525		$	—		$	235,056		$	146	$	385		$	—		$	—	$	—	$	234,525		$	—		$	235,056
Accounts receivable		—		10,810			3,371			—		—		572,982			—			587,163			—		10,810			3,371			—		—		572,982			—			587,163
Taxes receivable		—		4,566			—			—		—		70,718			—			75,284			—		4,566			—			—		—		70,718			—			75,284
Prepaid expenses		—		453			19			—		—		32,633			—			33,105			—		453			19			—		—		32,633			—			33,105
Short-term notes receivable from affiliates		—		119,476			—			—		—		122,298			(241,774	)		—			—		119,476			—			—		—		122,298			(241,774	)		—
Accounts receivable from affiliates		1,683,740		99,202			879,581			159,132		33,905		6,372,657			(9,228,217	)		—			1,683,740		99,202			879,581			159,132		33,905		6,372,657			(9,228,217	)		—
Other current assets		—		643			196			93		—		119,177			—			120,109			—		643			196			93		—		119,177			—			120,109

Total current assets		1,683,886		235,535			883,167			159,225		33,905		7,524,990			(9,469,991	)		1,050,717			1,683,886		235,535			883,167			159,225		33,905		7,524,990			(9,469,991	)		1,050,717

Property and equipment, at cost		—		2,737,764			75,001			—		—		12,693,229			—			15,505,994			—		2,737,764			75,001			—		—		12,693,229			—			15,505,994
Accumulated depreciation		—		(232,621	)		(54,599	)		—		—		(3,117,369	)		—			(3,404,589	)		—		(232,621	)		(54,599	)		—		—		(3,117,369	)		—			(3,404,589	)

Property and equipment, net		—		2,505,143			20,402			—		—		9,575,860			—			12,101,405			—		2,505,143			20,402			—		—		9,575,860			—			12,101,405

Notes receivable from affiliates		3,842,062		675,000			—			2,336,527		572,107		2,678,192			(10,103,888	)		—			3,842,062		675,000			—			2,336,527		572,107		2,678,192			(10,103,888	)		—
Investments in affiliates		6,969,201		9,101,938			3,450,212			6,605,771		2,141,450		—			(28,268,572	)		—			6,969,201		9,101,938			3,450,212			6,605,771		2,141,450		—			(28,268,572	)		—
Other assets		3,230		473			483			18,548		880		281,669			—			305,283			3,230		473			483			18,548		880		281,669			—			305,283

Total assets	$	12,498,379	$	12,518,089		$	4,354,264		$	9,120,071	$	2,748,342	$	20,060,711		$	(47,842,451	)	$	13,457,405		$	12,498,379	$	12,518,089		$	4,354,264		$	9,120,071	$	2,748,342	$	20,060,711		$	(47,842,451	)	$	13,457,405

LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
Current liabilities
Short-term notes payables from affiliates	$	72,298	$	50,000		$	—		$	—	$	—	$	119,476		$	(241,774	)	$	—		$	72,298	$	50,000		$	—		$	—	$	—	$	119,476		$	(241,774	)	$	—
Accounts payable		—		5,577			985			—		—		429,167			—			435,729			—		5,577			985			—		—		429,167			—			435,729
Accrued payroll and related costs		—		2,897			6,518			—		—		99,493			—			108,908			—		2,897			6,518			—		—		99,493			—			108,908
Accounts payable to affiliates		2,079,719		4,166,021			27,341			112,953		34,107		2,808,076			(9,228,217	)		—			2,079,719		4,166,021			27,341			112,953		34,107		2,808,076			(9,228,217	)		—
Interest payable		1,891		—			—			48,116		4,412		—			—			54,419			1,891		—			—			48,116		4,412		—			—			54,419
Taxes payable		—		10,032			—			—		—		81,158			—			91,190			—		10,032			—			—		—		81,158			—			91,190
Other current liabilities		—		—			240			—		—		123,159			—			123,399			—		—			240			—		—		123,159			—			123,399

Total current liabilities		2,153,908		4,234,527			35,084			161,069		38,519		3,660,529			(9,469,991	)		813,645			2,153,908		4,234,527			35,084			161,069		38,519		3,660,529			(9,469,991	)		813,645

Long-term debt		1,274,949		—			—			2,595,320		201,695		—			—			4,071,964			1,274,949		—			—			2,595,320		201,695		—			—			4,071,964
Notes payable to affiliates		1,667,291		1,147,500			85,000			975,000		811,000		5,418,097			(10,103,888	)		—			1,667,291		1,147,500			85,000			975,000		811,000		5,418,097			(10,103,888	)		—
Deferred income taxes		—		—			15,731			—		—		227,060			—			242,791			—		—			15,731			—		—		227,060			—			242,791
Other liabilities		19,929		24,878			—			—		—		210,565			—			255,372			19,929		24,878			—			—		—		210,565			—			255,372

Total liabilities		5,116,077		5,406,905			135,815			3,731,389		1,051,214		9,516,251			(19,573,879	)		5,383,772			5,116,077		5,406,905			135,815			3,731,389		1,051,214		9,516,251			(19,573,879	)		5,383,772

Commitments and contingencies

Total shareholder equity		7,382,302		7,111,184			4,218,449			5,388,682		1,697,128		9,853,129			(28,268,572	)		7,382,302			7,382,302		7,111,184			4,218,449			5,388,682		1,697,128		9,853,129			(28,268,572	)		7,382,302
Noncontrolling interest		—		—			—			—		—		691,331			—			691,331			—		—			—			—		—		691,331			—			691,331

Total equity		7,382,302		7,111,184			4,218,449			5,388,682		1,697,128		10,544,460			(28,268,572	)		8,073,633			7,382,302		7,111,184			4,218,449			5,388,682		1,697,128		10,544,460			(28,268,572	)		8,073,633

Total liabilities and equity	$	12,498,379	$	12,518,089		$	4,354,264		$	9,120,071	$	2,748,342	$	20,060,711		$	(47,842,451	)	$	13,457,405		$	12,498,379	$	12,518,089		$	4,354,264		$	9,120,071	$	2,748,342	$	20,060,711		$	(47,842,451	)	$	13,457,405

NOBLE CORPORATION (NOBLE-CAYMAN) AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF INCOME

Three Months Ended ~~June~~September 30, 2012

(in thousands)


																Other
																Non-guarantor
	Noble-			NHC and NDH												Subsidiaries			Consolidating
	Cayman			Combined			NDC			NHIL			NDS6			of Noble			Adjustments			Total			Noble- Cayman			NHC and NDH Combined			NDC			NHIL			NDS6			Other Non-guarantor Subsidiaries of Noble			Consolidating Adjustments			Total
Operating revenues
Contract drilling services	$	—		$	38,348		$	4,819		$	—		$	—		$	824,684		$	(19,614	)	$	848,237		$	—		$	36,149		$	5,061		$	—		$	—		$	809,858		$	(17,856	)	$	833,212
Reimbursables		—			502			—			—			—			30,310			—			30,812			—			389			—			—			—			27,748			—			28,137
Labor contract drilling services		—			—			—			—			—			19,863			—			19,863			—			—			—			—			—			22,667			—			22,667
Other		—			—			—			—			—			943			(932	)		11			—			—			—			—			—			16			—			16

Total operating revenues		—			38,850			4,819			—			—			875,800			(20,546	)		898,923			—			36,538			5,061			—			—			860,289			(17,856	)		884,032

Operating costs and expenses
Contract drilling services		1,256			14,375			1,839			18,779			—			405,895			(20,546	)		421,598			1,355			13,948			1,919			19,636			—			425,223			(17,856	)		444,225
Reimbursables		—			338			—			—			—			24,632			—			24,970			—			216			—			—			—			20,831			—			21,047
Labor contract drilling services		—			—			—			—			—			11,847			—			11,847			—			—			—			—			—			12,991			—			12,991
Depreciation and amortization		—			15,238			1,061			—			—			166,804			—			183,103			—			15,500			1,181			—			—			177,914			—			194,595
Selling, general and administrative		454			1,465			—			9,618			—			3,930			—			15,467			426			1,447			—			9,700			1			3,913			—			15,487
Loss on impairment		—			—			—			—			—			18,345			—			18,345
Gain on contract settlements/extinguishments, net		—			(4,869	)		—			—			—			(28,386	)		—			(33,255	)

Total operating costs and expenses		1,710			26,547			2,900			28,397			—			603,067			(20,546	)		642,075			1,781			31,111			3,100			29,336			1			640,872			(17,856	)		688,345

Operating income (loss)		(1,710	)		12,303			1,919			(28,397	)		—			272,733			—			256,848			(1,781	)		5,427			1,961			(29,336	)		(1	)		219,417			—			195,687

Other income (expense)
Equity earnings in affiliates, net of tax		197,409			154,580			10,078			230,830			69,542			—			(662,439	)		—			162,311			69,069			36,463			172,364			129,161			—			(569,368	)		—
Interest expense, net of amounts capitalized		(25,294	)		(14,003	)		(842	)		(29,494	)		(11,405	)		(20,076	)		80,462			(20,652	)		(30,496	)		(8,964	)		(852	)		(33,509	)		(11,832	)		(20,221	)		80,239			(25,635	)
Interest income and other, net		2,565			10,867			(21	)		32,925			2,815			32,919			(80,462	)		1,608			1,689			11,080			9			37,430			2,846			28,546			(80,239	)		1,361

Income before income taxes		172,970			163,747			11,134			205,864			60,952			285,576			(662,439	)		237,804			131,723			76,612			37,581			146,949			120,174			227,742			(569,368	)		171,413
Income tax provision		—			(13,487	)		—			—			—			(32,490	)		—			(45,977	)		—			(8,639	)		—			—			—			(16,145	)		—			(24,784	)

Net Income		172,970			150,260			11,134			205,864			60,952			253,086			(662,439	)		191,827			131,723			67,973			37,581			146,949			120,174			211,597			(569,368	)		146,629
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests		—			—			—			—			—			(18,857	)		—			(18,857	)		—			—			—			—			—			(14,906	)		—			(14,906	)

Net income attributable to Noble Corporation		172,970			150,260			11,134			205,864			60,952			234,229			(662,439	)		172,970			131,723			67,973			37,581			146,949			120,174			196,691			(569,368	)		131,723

Other comprehensive loss, net		(4,901	)		—			—			—			—			(4,901	)		4,901			(4,901	)
Other comprehensive income, net																										3,384			—			—			—			—			3,384			(3,384	)		3,384

Comprehensive income attributable to Noble Corporation	$	168,069		$	150,260		$	11,134		$	205,864		$	60,952		$	229,328		$	(657,538	)	$	168,069		$	135,107		$	67,973		$	37,581		$	146,949		$	120,174		$	200,075		$	(572,752	)	$	135,107

NOBLE CORPORATION (NOBLE-CAYMAN) AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF INCOME

~~Six~~Nine Months Ended ~~June~~September 30, 2012

(in thousands)


																Other
																Non-guarantor
	Noble-			NHC and NDH												Subsidiaries			Consolidating
	Cayman			Combined			NDC			NHIL			NDS6			of Noble			Adjustments			Total			Noble- Cayman			NHC and NDH Combined			NDC			NHIL			NDS6			Other Non-guarantor Subsidiaries of Noble			Consolidating Adjustments			Total
Operating revenues
Contract drilling services	$	—		$	81,339		$	9,880		$	—		$	—		$	1,542,760		$	(39,432	)	$	1,594,547		$	—		$	117,488		$	14,941		$	—		$	—		$	2,352,618		$	(57,288	)	$	2,427,759
Reimbursables		—			5,810			—			—			—			60,143			—			65,953			—			6,199			—			—			—			87,891			—			94,090
Labor contract drilling services		—			—			—			—			—			35,871			—			35,871			—			—			—			—			—			58,538			—			58,538
Other		—			—			—			—			—			1,174			(932	)		242			—			—			—			—			—			1,190			(932	)		258

Total operating revenues		—			87,149			9,880			—			—			1,639,948			(40,364	)		1,696,613			—			123,687			14,941			—			—			2,500,237			(58,220	)		2,580,645

Operating costs and expenses
Contract drilling services		2,439			28,694			3,610			36,412			—			805,953			(40,364	)		836,744			3,794			42,642			5,529			56,048			—			1,231,176			(58,220	)		1,280,969
Reimbursables		—			5,425			—			—			—			50,146			—			55,571			—			5,641			—			—			—			70,977			—			76,618
Labor contract drilling services		—			—			—			—			—			21,079			—			21,079			—			—			—			—			—			34,070			—			34,070
Depreciation and amortization		—			30,077			2,097			—			—			321,502			—			353,676			—			45,577			3,278			—			—			499,416			—			548,271
Selling, general and administrative		811			2,811			—			18,437			—			7,418			—			29,477			1,237			4,258			—			28,137			1			11,331			—			44,964
Loss on impairment		—			—			—			—			—			18,345			—			18,345			—			—			—			—			—			18,345			—			18,345
Gain on contract settlements/extinguishments, net		—			(4,869	)		—			—			—			(28,386	)		—			(33,255	)		—			(4,869	)		—			—			—			(28,386	)		—			(33,255	)

Total operating costs and expenses		3,250			62,138			5,707			54,849			—			1,196,057			(40,364	)		1,281,637			5,031			93,249			8,807			84,185			1			1,836,929			(58,220	)		1,969,982

Operating income (loss)		(3,250	)		25,011			4,173			(54,849	)		—			443,891			—			414,976			(5,031	)		30,438			6,134			(84,185	)		(1	)		663,308			—			610,663

Other income (expense)
Equity earnings in affiliates, net of tax		352,821			289,165			55,880			410,758			145,403			—			(1,254,027	)		—			515,132			358,234			92,343			583,122			274,564			—			(1,823,395	)		—
Interest expense, net of amounts capitalized		(45,900	)		(28,917	)		(2,188	)		(50,466	)		(19,188	)		(39,972	)		155,483			(31,148	)		(76,396	)		(37,881	)		(3,040	)		(83,975	)		(31,020	)		(60,193	)		235,722			(56,783	)
Interest income and other, net		3,951			18,691			(5	)		62,179			5,925			67,749			(155,483	)		3,007			5,640			29,771			4			99,609			8,771			96,295			(235,722	)		4,368

Income before income taxes		307,622			303,950			57,860			367,622			132,140			471,668			(1,254,027	)		386,835			439,345			380,562			95,441			514,571			252,314			699,410			(1,823,395	)		558,248
Income tax provision		—			(22,263	)		—			—			—			(44,925	)		—			(67,188	)		—			(30,902	)		—			—			—			(61,070	)		—			(91,972	)

Net Income		307,622			281,687			57,860			367,622			132,140			426,743			(1,254,027	)		319,647			439,345			349,660			95,441			514,571			252,314			638,340			(1,823,395	)		466,276
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests		—			—			—			—			—			(12,025	)		—			(12,025	)		—			—			—			—			—			(26,931	)		—			(26,931	)

Net income attributable to Noble Corporation		307,622			281,687			57,860			367,622			132,140			414,718			(1,254,027	)		307,622			439,345			349,660			95,441			514,571			252,314			611,409			(1,823,395	)		439,345

Other comprehensive loss, net		(1,140	)		—			—			—			—			(1,140	)		1,140			(1,140	)
Other comprehensive income, net																										2,244			—			—			—			—			2,244			(2,244	)		2,244

Comprehensive income attributable to Noble Corporation	$	306,482		$	281,687		$	57,860		$	367,622		$	132,140		$	413,578		$	(1,252,887	)	$	306,482		$	441,589		$	349,660		$	95,441		$	514,571		$	252,314		$	613,653		$	(1,825,639	)	$	441,589

NOBLE CORPORATION (NOBLE-CAYMAN) AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF INCOME

Three Months Ended ~~June~~September 30, 2011

(in thousands)


																Other
																Non-guarantor
	Noble-			NHC and NDH												Subsidiaries			Consolidating
	Cayman			Combined			NDC			NHIL			NDS6			of Noble			Adjustments			Total			Noble- Cayman			NHC and NDH Combined			NDC			NHIL			NDS6			Other Non-guarantor Subsidiaries of Noble			Consolidating Adjustments			Total
Operating revenues
Contract drilling services	$	—		$	35,090		$	4,705		$	—		$	—		$	566,145		$	(16,390	)	$	589,550		$	—		$	38,955		$	5,105		$	—		$	—		$	680,617		$	(19,785	)	$	704,892
Reimbursables		—			1,778			—			—			—			22,344			—			24,122			—			691			—			—			—			16,747			—			17,438
Labor contract drilling services		—			—			—			—			—			14,012			—			14,012			—			4			—			—			—			15,560			—			15,564
Other		—			—			—			—			—			313			—			313			—			—			—			—			—			8			—			8

Total operating revenues		—			36,868			4,705			—			—			602,814			(16,390	)		627,997			—			39,650			5,105			—			—			712,932			(19,785	)		737,902

Operating costs and expenses
Contract drilling services		1,598			12,085			1,975			8,236			—			322,700			(16,390	)		330,204			1,759			10,485			1,883			9,819			—			345,465			(19,785	)		349,626
Reimbursables		—			2,007			—			—			—			16,716			—			18,723			—			420			—			—			—			13,551			—			13,971
Labor contract drilling services		—			—			—			—			—			8,750			—			8,750			—			—			—			—			—			8,053			—			8,053
Depreciation and amortization		—			13,068			935			—			—			148,633			—			162,636			—			13,138			937			—			—			151,644			—			165,719
Selling, general and administrative		1,792			1,209			—			7,626			1			4,014			—			14,642			2,094			1,488			—			9,253			—			4,802			—			17,637
Gain on contract extinguishments, net		—			—			—			—			—			—			—			—

Total operating costs and expenses		3,390			28,369			2,910			15,862			1			500,813			(16,390	)		534,955			3,853			25,531			2,820			19,072			—			523,515			(19,785	)		555,006

Operating income (loss)		(3,390	)		8,499			1,795			(15,862	)		(1	)		102,001			—			93,042			(3,853	)		14,119			2,285			(19,072	)		—			189,417			—			182,896

Other income (expense)
Equity earnings in affiliates, net of tax		88,486			64,434			19,176			122,310			71,736			—			(366,142	)		—			174,673			226,079			45,818			172,153			(20,624	)		—			(598,099	)		—
Interest expense, net of amounts capitalized		(17,903	)		(15,323	)		(1,719	)		(23,530	)		(7,271	)		(886	)		51,803			(14,829	)		(16,721	)		(15,612	)		(1,285	)		(21,641	)		(7,106	)		(267	)		51,102			(11,530	)
Interest income and other, net		1,625			6,932			37			11,435			2,252			29,375			(51,803	)		(147	)		1,615			6,906			(40	)		15,813			2,277			26,415			(51,102	)		1,884

Income before income taxes		68,818			64,542			19,289			94,353			66,716			130,490			(366,142	)		78,066			155,714			231,492			46,778			147,253			(25,453	)		215,565			(598,099	)		173,250
Income tax provision		—			6,658			—			—			—			(15,815	)		—			(9,157	)
Income tax (provision) / benefit																										—			487			—			—			—			(17,785	)		—			(17,298	)

Net Income		68,818			71,200			19,289			94,353			66,716			114,675			(366,142	)		68,909			155,714			231,979			46,778			147,253			(25,453	)		197,780			(598,099	)		155,952
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests		—			—			—			—			—			(91	)		—			(91	)		—			—			—			—			—			(238	)		—			(238	)

Net income attributable to Noble Corporation		68,818			71,200			19,289			94,353			66,716			114,584			(366,142	)		68,818
Net income attributable to Noble Corporation																										155,714			231,979			46,778			147,253			(25,453	)		197,542			(598,099	)		155,714

Other comprehensive income, net		4,415			—			—			—			—			4,415			(4,415	)		4,415
Other comprehensive loss, net																										(13,896	)		—			—			—			—			(13,896	)		13,896			(13,896	)

Comprehensive income attributable to Noble Corporation	$	73,233		$	71,200		$	19,289		$	94,353		$	66,716		$	118,999		$	(370,557	)	$	73,233		$	141,818		$	231,979		$	46,778		$	147,253		$	(25,453	)	$	183,646		$	(584,203	)	$	141,818

NOBLE CORPORATION (NOBLE-CAYMAN) AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF INCOME

~~Six~~Nine Months Ended ~~June~~September 30, 2011

(in thousands)


																Other
																Non-guarantor
	Noble-			NHC and NDH												Subsidiaries			Consolidating
	Cayman			Combined			NDC			NHIL			NDS6			of Noble			Adjustments			Total			Noble- Cayman			NHC and NDH Combined			NDC			NHIL			NDS6			Other Non-guarantor Subsidiaries of Noble			Consolidating Adjustments			Total
Operating revenues
Contract drilling services	$	—		$	61,054		$	9,695		$	—		$	—		$	1,089,739		$	(28,333	)	$	1,132,155		$	—		$	100,009		$	14,800		$	—		$	—		$	1,770,356		$	(48,118	)	$	1,837,047
Reimbursables		—			2,690			12			—			—			43,711			—			46,413			—			3,381			12			—			—			60,458			—			63,851
Labor contract drilling services		—			—			—			—			—			27,559			—			27,559			—			4			—			—			—			43,119			—			43,123
Other		—			—			—			—			—			758			—			758			—			—			—			—			—			766			—			766

Total operating revenues		—			63,744			9,707			—			—			1,161,767			(28,333	)		1,206,885			—			103,394			14,812			—			—			1,874,699			(48,118	)		1,944,787

Operating costs and expenses
Contract drilling services		3,059			21,069			3,798			16,806			—			614,637			(28,333	)		631,036			4,818			31,554			5,681			26,625			—			960,102			(48,118	)		980,662
Reimbursables		—			2,911			—			—			—			32,915			—			35,826			—			3,331			—			—			—			46,466			—			49,797
Labor contract drilling services		—			—			—			—			—			17,273			—			17,273			—			—			—			—			—			25,326			—			25,326
Depreciation and amortization		—			23,192			1,844			—			—			295,255			—			320,291			—			36,330			2,781			—			—			446,899			—			486,010
Selling, general and administrative		3,303			2,718			—			15,503			1			9,648			—			31,173			5,397			4,206			—			24,756			1			14,450			—			48,810
Gain on contract extinguishments, net		—			—			—			—			—			(21,202	)		—			(21,202	)		—			—			—			—			—			(21,202	)		—			(21,202	)

Total operating costs and expenses		6,362			49,890			5,642			32,309			1			948,526			(28,333	)		1,014,397			10,215			75,421			8,462			51,381			1			1,472,041			(48,118	)		1,569,403

Operating income (loss)		(6,362	)		13,854			4,065			(32,309	)		(1	)		213,241			—			192,488			(10,215	)		27,973			6,350			(51,381	)		(1	)		402,658			—			375,384

Other income (expense)
Equity earnings in affiliates, net of tax		175,766			102,373			34,977			172,371			107,556			—			(593,043	)		—			350,439			328,452			80,795			344,524			86,932			—			(1,191,142	)		—
Interest expense, net of amounts capitalized		(36,264	)		(29,915	)		(3,539	)		(46,026	)		(14,942	)		(3,017	)		99,833			(33,870	)		(52,985	)		(45,527	)		(4,824	)		(67,667	)		(22,048	)		(3,284	)		150,935			(45,400	)
Interest income and other, net		3,338			12,470			48			22,744			4,044			59,283			(99,833	)		2,094			4,953			19,376			8			38,557			6,321			85,698			(150,935	)		3,978

Income before income taxes		136,478			98,782			35,551			116,780			96,657			269,507			(593,043	)		160,712			292,192			330,274			82,329			264,033			71,204			485,072			(1,191,142	)		333,962
Income tax provision		—			5,800			—			—			—			(29,982	)		—			(24,182	)
Income tax (provision) / benefit																										—			6,287			—			—			—			(47,767	)		—			(41,480	)

Net Income		136,478			104,582			35,551			116,780			96,657			239,525			(593,043	)		136,530			292,192			336,561			82,329			264,033			71,204			437,305			(1,191,142	)		292,482
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests		—			—			—			—			—			(52	)		—			(52	)		—			—			—			—			—			(290	)		—			(290	)

Net income attributable to Noble Corporation		136,478			104,582			35,551			116,780			96,657			239,473			(593,043	)		136,478			292,192			336,561			82,329			264,033			71,204			437,015			(1,191,142	)		292,192

Other comprehensive income, net		7,904			—			—			—			—			7,904			(7,904	)		7,904
Other comprehensive loss, net																										(5,992	)		—			—			—			—			(5,992	)		5,992			(5,992	)

Comprehensive income attributable to Noble Corporation	$	144,382		$	104,582		$	35,551		$	116,780		$	96,657		$	247,377		$	(600,947	)	$	144,382		$	286,200		$	336,561		$	82,329		$	264,033		$	71,204		$	431,023		$	(1,185,150	)	$	286,200

NOBLE CORPORATION (NOBLE-CAYMAN) AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS

~~Six~~Nine Months Ended ~~June~~September 30, 2012

(in thousands)


																Other
																Non-guarantor
	Noble-			NHC and NDH												Subsidiaries			Consolidating
	Cayman			Combined			NDC			NHIL			NDS6			of Noble			Adjustments			Total			Noble- Cayman			NHC and NDH Combined			NDC			NHIL			NDS6			Other Non-guarantor Subsidiaries of Noble			Consolidating Adjustments			Total
Cash flows from operating activities
Net cash from operating activities	$	(39,135	)	$	8,929		$	4,457		$	(32,947	)	$	(13,203	)	$	623,600		$	—		$	551,701		$	(59,614	)	$	7,563		$	8,989		$	(107,638	)	$	(25,942	)	$	1,133,499		$	—		$	956,857

Cash flows from investing activities
Capital expenditures		—			(182,619	)		(306	)		—			—			(480,775	)		—			(663,700	)
Change in accrued capital expenditures		—			—			—			—			—			(159,134	)		—			(159,134	)
New construction and capital expenditures																										—			(499,141	)		(1,040	)		—			—			(940,534	)		—			(1,440,715	)
Notes receivable from affiliates		—			—			—			(1,188,287	)		—			—			1,188,287			—			—			—			—			(1,188,287	)		—			—			1,188,287			—

Net cash from investing activities		—			(182,619	)		(306	)		(1,188,287	)		—			(639,909	)		1,188,287			(822,834	)		—			(499,141	)		(1,040	)		(1,188,287	)		—			(940,534	)		1,188,287			(1,440,715	)

Cash flows from financing activities
Borrowings on bank credit facilities		325,000			—			—			—			—			—			—			325,000
Repayments on bank credit facilities		(1,150,000	)		—			—			—			—			—			—			(1,150,000	)
Change in bank credit facilities, net																										(630,000	)		—			—			—			—			—			—			(630,000	)
Proceeds from issuance of senior notes, net		—			—			—			1,186,636			—			—			—			1,186,636			—			—			—			1,186,636			—			—			—			1,186,636
Contributions from joint venture partners		—			—			—			—			—			40,000			—			40,000			—			—			—			—			—			40,000			—			40,000
Financing costs on credit facilities		(5,014	)		—			—			—			—			—			—			(5,014	)		(5,014	)		—			—			—			—			—			—			(5,014	)
Distributions to parent		(92,675	)		—			—			—			—			—			—			(92,675	)		(129,139	)		—			—			—			—			—			—			(129,139	)
Advances (to) from affiliates		(226,514	)		173,636			(4,151	)		34,602			13,203			9,224			—			—			(364,666	)		491,628			(7,949	)		109,308			25,942			(254,263	)		—			—
Notes payable to affiliates		1,188,287			—			—			—			—			—			(1,188,287	)		—			1,188,287			—			—			—			—			—			(1,188,287	)		—

Net cash from financing activities		39,084			173,636			(4,151	)		1,221,238			13,203			49,224			(1,188,287	)		303,947			59,468			491,628			(7,949	)		1,295,944			25,942			(214,263	)		(1,188,287	)		462,483

Net change in cash and cash equivalents		(51	)		(54	)		—			4			—			32,915			—			32,814			(146	)		50			—			19			—			(21,298	)		—			(21,375	)
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period		146			385			—			—			—			234,525			—			235,056			146			385			—			—			—			234,525			—			235,056

Cash and cash equivalents, end of period	$	95		$	331		$	—		$	4		$	—		$	267,440		$	—		$	267,870		$	—		$	435		$	—		$	19		$	—		$	213,227		$	—		$	213,681

NOBLE CORPORATION (NOBLE-CAYMAN) AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS

~~Six~~Nine Months Ended ~~June~~September 30, 2011

(in thousands)

Other
Non-guarantor
Noble- NHC and NDH Subsidiaries Consolidating
Cayman Combined NDC NHIL NDS6 of Noble Adjustments Total
Cash flows from operating activities

Net cash from operating activities
$ (30,984 ) $ 23,361    $ 2,591    $ (43,770 ) $ (10,840 ) $ 306,119    $ —      $ 246,477

Cash flows from investing activities

Capital expenditures
—      (846,292 ) (197 ) —      —      (564,793 ) —      (1,411,282 )
Change in accrued capital expenditures
—      —      —      —      —      (51,500 ) —      (51,500 )
Notes receivable from affiliates
20,000    —      —      —      —      91,000    (111,000 ) —
Refund from contract extinguishments
—      —      —      —      —      18,642    —      18,642

Net cash from investing activities
20,000    (846,292 ) (197 ) —      —      (506,651 ) (111,000 ) (1,444,140 )

Cash flows from financing activities

Borrowings on bank credit facilities
625,000    —      —      —      —      —      —      625,000
Repayments on bank credit facilities
(240,000 ) —      —      —      —      —      —      (240,000 )
Proceeds from issuance of senior notes, net
—      —      —      1,087,833    —      —      —      1,087,833
Contributions from joint venture partners
—      —      —      —      —      436,000    —      436,000
Payments of joint venture debt
—      —      —      —      —      (693,494 ) —      (693,494 )
Settlement of interest rate swaps
—      —      —      —      —      (29,032 ) —      (29,032 )
Financing costs on credit facilities
(2,835 ) —      —      —      —      —      —      (2,835 )
Distributions to parent
(94,291 ) —      —      —      —      —      —      (94,291 )
Advances (to) from affiliates
(238,391 ) 840,576    32,606    (1,044,063 ) 10,840    398,432    —      —
Notes payable to affiliates
(38,500 ) (17,500 ) (35,000 ) —      —      (20,000 ) 111,000    —

Net cash from financing activities
10,983    823,076    (2,394 ) 43,770    10,840    91,906    111,000    1,089,181

Net change in cash and cash equivalents
(1 ) 145    —      —      —      (108,626 ) —      (108,482 )
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period
42    146    —      —      —      333,211    —      333,399

Cash and cash equivalents, end of period
$ 41    $ 291    $ —      $ —      $ —      $ 224,585    $ —      $ 224,917


	Noble- Cayman			NHC and NDH Combined			NDC			NHIL			NDS6			Other Non-guarantor Subsidiaries of Noble			Consolidating Adjustments			Total
Cash flows from operating activities
Net cash from operating activities	$	(40,060	)	$	30,944		$	6,889		$	(105,014	)	$	(19,420	)	$	614,119		$	—		$	487,458

Cash flows from investing activities
New construction and capital expenditures		—			(1,135,054	)		(475	)		—			—			(880,871	)		—			(2,016,400	)
Notes receivable from affiliates		20,000			—			—			(1,096,927	)		—			200,000			876,927			—
Refund from contract extinguishments		—			—			—			—			—			18,642			—			18,642

Net cash from investing activities		20,000			(1,135,054	)		(475	)		(1,096,927	)		—			(662,229	)		876,927			(1,997,758	)

Cash flows from financing activities
Change in bank credit facilities, net		675,000			—			—			—			—			—			—			675,000
Proceeds from issuance of senior notes, net		—			—			—			1,087,833			—			—			—			1,087,833
Contributions from joint venture partners		—			—			—			—			—			481,000			—			481,000
Payments of joint venture debt		—			—			—			—			—			(693,494	)		—			(693,494	)
Settlement of interest rate swaps		—			—			—			—			—			(29,032	)		—			(29,032	)
Financing costs on credit facilities		(2,835	)		—			—			—			—			—			—			(2,835	)
Distributions to parent		(149,566	)		—			—			—			—			—			—			(149,566	)
Advances (to) from affiliates		(355,081	)		1,121,756			28,586			114,108			19,420			(928,789	)		—			—
Notes payable to affiliates		(147,500	)		(17,500	)		(35,000	)		—			—			1,076,927			(876,927	)		—

Net cash from financing activities		20,018			1,104,256			(6,414	)		1,201,941			19,420			(93,388	)		(876,927	)		1,368,906

Net change in cash and cash equivalents		(42	)		146			—			—			—			(141,498	)		—			(141,394	)
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period		42			146			—			—			—			333,211			—			333,399

Cash and cash equivalents, end of period	$	—		$	292		$	—		$	—		$	—		$	191,713		$	—		$	192,005

~~Item 2.~~ ~~Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations~~

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

The following discussion is intended to assist you in understanding our financial position at ~~June~~September 30, 2012, and our results of operations for the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2012 and 2011. The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and related notes contained in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011 filed by Noble Corporation, a Swiss corporation (“Noble-Swiss”), and Noble Corporation, a Cayman Islands company (“Noble-Cayman”).

Forward-Looking Statements

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q includes “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the U.S. Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. All statements other than statements of historical facts included in this report regarding contract backlog, fleet status, our financial position, business strategy, timing or results of acquisitions or dispositions, repayment of debt, borrowings under our Credit Facilities (as defined below), issuance of commercial paper notes, completion and acceptance of our newbuild rigs, future capital expenditures, contract commitments, dayrates, contract commencements, extension or renewals, contract tenders, the outcome of any dispute, litigation or investigation, plans and objectives of management for future operations, foreign currency requirements, results of joint ventures, indemnity and other contract claims, construction and upgrade of rigs, industry conditions including the effect of disruptions of drilling in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico, access to financing, impact of competition, governmental regulations and permitting, availability of labor, worldwide economic conditions, taxes and tax rates, indebtedness covenant compliance, and timing for compliance with any new regulations are forward-looking statements. When used in this report, the words “anticipate,” “believe,” “estimate,” “expect,” “intend,” “may,” “plan,” “project,” “should” and similar expressions are intended to be among the statements that identify forward-looking statements. Although we believe that the expectations reflected in such forward-looking statements are reasonable, we cannot assure you that such expectations will prove to be correct. These forward-looking statements speak only as of the date of this report on Form 10-Q and we undertake no obligation to revise or update any forward-looking statement for any reason, except as required by law. We have identified factors including but not limited to operating hazards and delays, risks associated with operations outside the U.S., actions by regulatory authorities, customers, joint venture partners, contractors, lenders and other third parties, legislation and regulations affecting drilling operations, costs and difficulties relating to the integration of businesses, factors affecting the level of activity in the oil and gas industry, supply and demand of drilling rigs, factors affecting the duration of contracts, the actual amount of downtime, factors that reduce applicable dayrates, violations of anti-corruption laws, hurricanes and other weather conditions and the future price of oil and gas that could cause actual plans or results to differ materially from those included in any forward-looking statements. These factors include those referenced or described in Part I, Item 1A. “Risk Factors” of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011, our Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q and in our other filings with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). We cannot control such risk factors and other uncertainties, and in many cases, we cannot predict the risks and uncertainties that could cause our actual results to differ materially from those indicated by the forward-looking statements. You should consider these risks and uncertainties when you are evaluating us.

Executive Overview

Noble-Swiss is a leading provider of offshore contract drilling services for the oil and gas industry. Our fleet of 79 mobile offshore drilling units consists of 14 semisubmersibles, 14 drillships, 49 jackups and two submersibles. Additionally, we have one floating production storage and offloading unit. Our fleet includes 11 units under construction as follows:

five dynamically positioned, ultra-deepwater, harsh environment drillships and

six high-specification heavy-duty, harsh environment jackup rigs.

Outlook

During the first ~~six~~nine months of 2012, we continued to see stability in the offshore drilling market even as the underlying commodity markets were ~~volatile.~~subject to short-term volatility. In the U.S. Gulf of Mexico, the granting of permits and publication of new safety rules has led to more stable activity levels within the industry, especially as it relates to the deepwater markets. The continued ~~stable activity~~stability reflects the positive long-term outlook for commodity prices, which has led to greater investment and ~~has~~ contributed to ~~an improvement in~~improved dayrates for deepwater and ultra-deepwater rigs worldwide. While there are still risks, including potential ~~third party~~third-party environmental lawsuits targeting the permitting process, possible new drilling regulations, a failure of the federal agencies of the U.S. government to issue permits in a timely manner and the adoption by individual operators of new drilling or equipment standards exceeding those required by regulatory bodies, we believe the potential for these risks will be reduced as long as rigs continue to work without incident in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico.

There continues to be uncertainty regarding the sustainability of the global economic recovery, which is proceeding unevenly in different geographic regions. In addition to political instability in certain oil producing nations in the Middle East and North Africa, there is also uncertainty regarding recovery in the credit markets, particularly in Europe, which some analysts predict could be the catalyst for a worldwide recession. As a result, oil prices during 2012 have been ~~volatile.~~volatile for short-term pricing. Supply side concerns in response to continued political unrest in the Middle East and North Africa are weighed against global recession fears. Natural gas prices in the United States continue to be at low levels based on current oversupply. We believe these competing factors will impact the volatility in the offshore drilling market and the prices of oil and gas commodities for the foreseeable future.

Despite the instability in the global economy and commodity prices noted above, the market for offshore drilling services has continued the upward trend that began in 2011. We believe both the short-term and long-term outlook for the deep and ultra-deepwater markets continues to strengthen. Market dayrates for new ultra-deepwater units remain ~~generally~~ above $500,000, which is higher than rates seen in recent years. A number of fixtures have exceeded $550,000, and in certain cases even exceeded $600,000. Our market analysis indicates that there is little, if any, availability of ultra-deepwater units for 2012, and 2013 availability is rapidly decreasing. Utilization rates for jackup units stabilized in 2011, and improved in most regions during the first ~~half~~nine months of 2012. While we currently have ~~certain~~three jackup rigs ~~idle,~~available, we have seen tangible market activity and anticipate a favorable environment for these rigs in the short-term. We continue to see differentiation in the jackup market, with newer units having utilization rates and dayrates exceeding those for units that entered service before 2000. However, we continue to see improvement in the older jack-up market with increased utilization and competitive dayrates. ~~While we have several of these units idle, we have seen tangible market activity and are actively pursuing a number of opportunities for these rigs.~~

Demand for our drilling services generally depends on a variety of economic and political factors, including worldwide demand for oil and gas, the ability of the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries (“OPEC”) to set and maintain production levels and pricing, the level of production of non-OPEC countries and the policies of various governments regarding access to their oil and gas reserves. Our results of operations depend on offshore drilling activity worldwide. Historically, oil and gas prices and market expectations of potential changes in these prices have significantly affected that level of activity. Generally, higher oil and natural gas prices, or our customers’ expectations of higher prices, result in greater demand for our services and lower oil and gas prices result in reduced demand for our services. Demand for our services is also a function of the worldwide supply of mobile offshore drilling units. Industry analysts widely report that a significant expansion of industry supply of both jackups and ultra-deepwater units is underway. ~~The~~This increased supply and the introduction of additional non-contracted rigs into the marketplace could have an adverse effect on demand for our services or the dayrates we are able to achieve.

We currently have ~~twelve~~12 rigs contracted in Mexico with Pemex Exploracion y Produccion (“Pemex”), and three of these rigs have contracts scheduled to expire in the fourth quarter of 2012. Pemex continues to tender for additional jackup rigs as it attempts to increase the number of working rigs. Some previous tenders published by Pemex contained a requirement that certain units must have entered service since the year 2000. While Pemex did not succeed in securing a significant number of newer rigs from those published tenders, we cannot predict whether this age requirement will be present in future Pemex tenders. If this requirement is present in future tenders, it could require us to seek work for our rigs in other locations, as the ages of our rigs currently operating in Mexico do not meet this requirement. If such work is not available, it could lead to additional idle time on some of our rigs. We cannot predict how many rigs might be affected or how long they could remain idle. ~~We remain optimistic that many, if not all,~~Given the current market conditions and availability of rigs, we believe our rigs ~~currently operating~~will either receive contract extensions with PEMEX or will find additional work in ~~Mexico will continue to secure long-term work with Pemex.~~the future.

In connection with our existing drilling contracts with Petrobras for two of our drillships operating in Brazil, we approved certain shipyard reliability upgrade projects for these drillships, theNoble Leo Segerius and theNoble Roger Eason. These upgrade projects are designed to enhance the reliability and operational performance of these drillships. During the first quarter of 2012, theNoble Leo Segerius completed the shipyard portion of its reliability upgrade and departed the shipyard in Brazil for seatrials, final commissioning and customer acceptance activities. TheNoble Leo Segerius ~~is currently scheduled to return~~returned to work in the ~~third~~fourth quarter of 2012. TheNoble Roger Eason entered the shipyard for its reliability upgrade in the second quarter of 2012, which is expected to take approximately ~~300~~270 days to complete. There are a number of risks associated with shipyard projects of this nature, particularly in Brazil, including potential project delays and cost overruns because of labor, customs, local shipyard, local content and other issues. For example, recently a number of labor issues within the operational and regulatory support infrastructure in Brazil caused two rigs to be delayed in returning to operations following the completion of shipyard projects. In addition, the drilling contracts for these vessels provide Petrobras with certain rights of termination in the event of excessive downtime, and it is possible that Petrobras could exercise this right in the future with respect to one or both of these drillships. We intend to continue to closely monitor and discuss with Petrobras the status of these projects and plan to take appropriate steps to mitigate identified risks, which depending upon the circumstances, could involve a variety of options.

Results and Strategy

Our business strategy focuses on the active expansion of our fleet through construction ~~upgrades and modifications,~~ and acquisitions of drilling units, ~~as well as the deployment~~coupled with upgrades and modifications of existing units. We seek to deploy our drilling assets in important oil and gas producing areas. We have actively expanded our offshore drilling and deepwater capabilities in recent years through the construction of new rigs, and as part of this technical and operational expansion, we plan to continue pursuing opportunities to upgrade our fleet to achieve greater technological capability, which we believe will lead to increased drilling ~~efficiencies.~~efficiencies and the ability to complete increasingly more complex well programs.

We believe modernizing our overall fleet is an important element of our strategy. We may dispose of some, or all, of our lower specification units and related assets and operations in one or more transactions. These dispositions may include sales of assets to third parties, a spin-off or other distribution or separation of assets. In analyzing any disposition, we will consider the strategic benefit of the potential transaction while seeking to secure what we consider appropriate value to our shareholders. To date, no potential disposition has provided the results we seek. The drilling market for lower specification units has recently improved. While we expect the increased utilization and dayrates experienced in most regions for these assets to contribute positively to our overall results under current market conditions, we do continue to analyze strategic options for these lower specification ~~units.~~units in a manner that we believe will maximize shareholder value. We can provide no assurance as to whether, or when, any disposition transaction will occur or what form it may take.

At ~~June~~September 30, 2012, we continued our newbuild strategy with the following 11 projects:

one dynamically positioned, ultra-deepwater, harsh environment Globetrotter-class drillship, which is scheduled to be delivered to our customer in the fourth quarter of 2013;

four dynamically positioned, ultra-deepwater, harsh environment drillships at Hyundai Heavy Industries Co. Ltd. (“HHI”), the first of which is estimated to be delivered from the shipyard to begin acceptance testing in the second quarter of 2013; and

six high-specification heavy duty, harsh environment jackup rigs, the first of which is estimated to be delivered from the shipyard to begin acceptance testing in the first quarter of 2013.

Of our 11 rigs under construction as of ~~June~~September 30, 2012, two of the drillships are committed for five years or ~~more. We also recently received an 18-month contract on one jackup, the~~~~Noble Regina Allen,~~more and ~~a three-year contract on~~ one drillship is committed for three years. Additionally, two of the ~~Noble Bob Douglas~~. jackup rigs have received commitments for contracts. The remaining rigs are currently being constructed without contracts.

While we cannot predict the future level of demand or dayrates for our drilling services or future conditions in the offshore contract drilling industry, we continue to believe we are well positioned within the industry and our newbuild program will further strengthen our position, especially in the ultra-deepwater and high-specification ~~jackup~~ markets.

In the ~~second~~third quarter of 2012, we recognized net income attributable to Noble-Swiss of ~~$160~~$115 million, or ~~$0.63~~$0.45 per diluted share, on total revenues of ~~$899~~$884 million. Sequential results of key metrics are as follows:


	Three Months Ended						Three Months Ended
	June 30,			March 31,			September 30,			June 30,
	2012			2012			2012			2012
Average dayrate	$	181,663		$	167,124		$	168,608		$	181,663
Average utilization		76	%		74	%		78	%		76	%
Daily contract drilling services costs	$	90,699		$	94,055		$	90,885		$	90,699
Contract drilling services margin		50	%		44	%		46	%		50	%

Contract Drilling Services Backlog

We maintain a backlog (as defined below) of commitments for contract drilling services. The following table sets forth, as of ~~June~~September 30, 2012, the amount of our contract drilling services backlog and the percent of available operating days committed for the periods indicated:


			Year Ending December 31,																	Year Ending December 31,
	Total		2012⁽¹⁾			2013			2014			2015			2016-2023			Total		2012 ⁽¹⁾			2013			2014			2015			2016-2023
	(In millions)																	(In millions)
Contract Drilling Services Backlog
Semisubmersibles/Drillships^{(2) (4) (6)}	$	12,255	$	1,219		$	2,591		$	2,459		$	1,613		$	4,373		$	12,495	$	651		$	2,607		$	2,614		$	1,878		$	4,745
Jackups/Submersibles⁽³⁾		2,159		639			927			496			97			—			2,302		344			1,229			631			98			—

Total⁽⁴⁾	$	14,414	$	1,858		$	3,518		$	2,955		$	1,710		$	4,373		$	14,797	$	995		$	3,836		$	3,245		$	1,976		$	4,745

Percent of Available Operating Days Committed⁽⁵⁾				79	%		61	%		40	%		17	%		4	%
Percent of Available Operating Days
Committed⁽⁵⁾																					83	%		69	%		45	%		19	%		5	%

(1)	Represents a ~~six-month~~three-month period beginning ~~July~~October 1, 2012.

(2)

Our drilling contracts with Petrobras provide an opportunity for us to earn performance bonuses based on downtime experienced for our rigs operating offshore Brazil. With respect to our semisubmersibles operating offshore Brazil for Petrobras, we have included in our backlog an amount equal to 75 percent of potential performance bonuses for such semisubmersibles, which amount is based on and generally consistent with our historical earnings of performance bonuses for these rigs. With respect to our drillships presently operating offshore Brazil for Petrobras, we (a) have not included in our backlog any performance bonuses for periods prior to the commencement of certain upgrade projects planned for 2012 and 2013, which projects are designed to enhance the reliability and operational performance of these drillships, and (b) have included in our backlog an amount equal to 75 percent of potential performance bonuses for periods after the estimated completion of such upgrade projects. Our backlog for semisubmersibles/drillships includes approximately ~~$220~~$219 million attributable to these performance bonuses.

The drilling contracts with Shell for theNoble Globetrotter I,Noble Globetrotter II,Noble Jim Thompson,~~Noble Jim Day~~ ~~and~~Noble Clyde BoudreauxandNoble Max Smith, as well as the letters of intent for theNoble ~~Don Taylor~~Jim Day andNoble ~~Max Smith~~Don Taylor, provide opportunities for us to earn performance bonuses based on key performance indicators as defined by Shell. With respect to these contracts, we have included in our backlog an amount equal to 50 percent of the potential performance bonuses for these ~~rigs, except for the~~~~Noble Clyde Boudreaux,~~~~while it is working in Brazil, where limited bonus is expected.~~rigs. Our backlog for these rigs includes approximately ~~$418~~$414 million attributable to these performance bonuses.

~~(3)~~

Pemex has the ability to cancel its drilling contracts on 30 days or less notice without requiring an early termination payment by Pemex. As of June 30, 2012, we had 12 rigs contracted to Pemex in Mexico, and our backlog includes approximately $790 million related to such contracts at June

(3)

Pemex has the ability to cancel its drilling contracts on 30 days or less notice without requiring an early termination payment by Pemex. As of September 30, 2012, we had 12 rigs contracted to Pemex in Mexico, and our backlog includes approximately $693 million related to such contracts at September 30, 2012.

(4) Our drilling contracts generally provide the customer an early termination right in the event we fail to meet certain performance standards, including downtime thresholds. For example, Petrobras has the right to terminate its contracts in the event of excessive downtime. While we have exceeded downtime thresholds in the past on certain rigs contracted with Petrobras, ~~has the right to terminate its contracts in the event of excessive downtime. While we have exceeded downtime thresholds on the~~~~Noble Dave Beard~~ ~~and the~~~~Noble Paul Wolff,~~we have not received any notification concerning contract cancellations to date nor do we anticipate receiving any such notifications.
~~(5)~~ ~~Percentages take into account additional capacity from the estimated dates of deployment of our newbuild rigs that are scheduled to commence operations during 2012 through 2015.~~
~~(6)~~ ~~Noble and a subsidiary of Shell are involved in joint venture agreements to own and operate both the~~~~Noble Bully I~~ ~~and the~~ ~~Noble Bully II~~~~. Pursuant to these agreements, each party has an equal 50 percent share in both vessels. As of June 30, 2012, the combined amount of backlog for these rigs totaled $2.5~~
(5) Percentages take into account additional capacity from the estimated dates of deployment of our newbuild rigs that are scheduled to commence operations during 2012 through 2015.
(6) Noble and a subsidiary of Shell are involved in joint venture agreements to own and operate both theNoble Bully I and the Noble Bully II. Pursuant to these agreements, each party has an equal 50 percent share in both vessels. As of September 30, 2012, the combined amount of backlog for these rigs totaled $2.4 billion, all of which is included in our backlog. Noble’s proportionate interest in the backlog for these rigs was $1.2 billion.
Our contract drilling services backlog reported above reflects estimated future revenues attributable to both signed drilling contracts and letters of intent that we expect will become binding contracts. A letter of intent is generally subject to customary conditions, including the execution of a definitive drilling contract. For a number of reasons, it is possible that some customers that have entered into letters of intent will not enter into signed drilling contracts. We calculate backlog for any given unit and period by multiplying the full contractual operating dayrate for such unit by the number of days remaining in the period. The reported contract drilling services backlog does not include amounts representing revenues for mobilization, demobilization and contract preparation, which are not expected to be significant to our contract drilling services revenues, amounts constituting reimbursables from customers or amounts attributable to uncommitted option periods under drilling contracts or letters of intent.
The amount of actual revenues earned and the actual periods during which revenues are earned may be different than the backlog amounts and backlog periods set forth in the table above for various factors, including, but not limited to, shipyard and maintenance projects, operational downtime, weather conditions, bonuses and other factors that result in applicable dayrates lower than the full contractual operating dayrate. In addition, amounts included in the backlog may change as a result of government-imposed restrictions or delays in the issuance of drilling permits. Furthermore, drilling contracts may be varied or modified by mutual consent or customers may exercise early termination rights contained in some of our drilling contracts or decline to enter into a drilling contract after executing a letter of intent. As a result, our backlog as of any particular date may not be indicative of our actual operating results for the subsequent periods for which the backlog is calculated.
As of September 30, 2012, we estimate Shell and Petrobras represented approximately 61% and 15%, respectively, of our backlog.
Nigerian Operations
As previously disclosed, in November 2010 we finalized settlements with the SEC and the Department of Justice as the result of an internal investigation of the legality under the United States Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (“FCPA”) and local laws of certain reimbursement payments made by our Nigerian affiliate to our customs agents in Nigeria. In January 2011, a subsidiary of Noble-Swiss resolved an investigation by the Nigerian Economic and Financial Crimes Commission and the Nigerian Attorney General Office into these same activities. Any additional investigation by these or other agencies could damage our reputation and result in substantial fines, sanctions, civil and/or criminal penalties and curtailment of operations in certain jurisdictions and might adversely affect our business, results of operations or financial condition. Further, resolving any additional investigations could be expensive and consume significant time and attention of our senior management.
In April 2010, the Nigerian Oil and Gas Industry Content Development Bill was signed into law. The law is designed to create Nigerian content in operations and transactions within the Nigerian oil and gas industry. The law sets forth certain requirements for the utilization of Nigerian human resources and goods and services in oil and gas projects and creates a Nigerian Content Development and Monitoring Board (“NCDMB”) to implement and monitor the law and develop regulations pursuant to the law. The NCDMB has indicated that it will require all non-Nigerian offshore drilling companies to reorganize their local operations to include Nigerian indigenous minority interests in the operating assets and to obtain the approval of the NCDMB for future work in Nigeria. The NCDMB actively monitors awards for future work and reviews plans for local content and development of Nigerian interests. The law also established a Nigerian Content Development Fund to fund the implementation of the law, and requires that 1 percent of the value of every contract awarded in the Nigerian oil and gas industry be paid into the fund. We cannot predict what impact the law may have on our existing or future operations in Nigeria, but the effect on our operations there could be significant.
Results of Operations
For the Three Months Ended September 30, 2012 and 2011
Net income attributable to Noble Corporation (“Noble-Swiss”) for the three months ended September 30, 2012 (the “Current Quarter”) was $115 million, or $0.45 per diluted share, on operating revenues of $884 million, compared to net income for the three months ended September 30, 2011 (the “Comparable Quarter”) of $135 million, or $0.53 per diluted share, on operating revenues of $738 million.
The consolidated financial statements of Noble-Swiss include the accounts of Noble-Cayman; Noble-Swiss conducts substantially all of its business through Noble-Cayman and its subsidiaries. As a result, the financial position and results of operations for Noble-Cayman, and the reasons for material changes in the amount of revenue and expense items between 2012 and 2011, would be the same as the information presented below regarding Noble-Swiss in all material respects, except operating income for Noble-Cayman for the three months ended September 30, 2012 was $17 million higher than operating income for Noble-Swiss for the same period. The operating income difference is primarily a result of executive costs directly attributable to Noble-Swiss for operations support and stewardship related services.
Rig Utilization, Operating Days and Average Dayrates
Operating revenues and operating costs and expenses for our contract drilling services segment are dependent on three primary metrics — rig utilization, operating days and dayrates. The following table sets forth the average rig utilization, operating days and average dayrates for our rig fleet for the three months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011:
   Average Rig
Utilization (1) Operating
Days (2) Average
Dayrates
   Three Months Ended
September 30, Three Months Ended
September 30,    Three Months Ended
September 30,
   2012 2011 2012    2011    % Change 2012    2011    % Change
Jackups
   83 % 82 % 3,285       3,229       2 % $ 97,857       $ 89,352       10 %
Semisubmersibles
   83 % 84 % 1,067       1,086       -2 % 331,900       315,034       5 %
Drillships
   73 % 60 % 590       329       79 % 267,166       225,669       18 %
Other
   0 % 0 % —         —         —      —         —         —





Total
   78 % 76 % 4,942       4,644       6 % $ 168,608       $ 151,782       11 %





(1) Information reflects our policy of reporting on the basis of the number of rigs in our fleet, excluding newbuild rigs under construction.
(2) Information reflects the number of days remaining in the period. The reported contract drilling services backlog does not include amounts representing revenues for mobilization, demobilization and contract preparation, which are not expected to be significant tothat our ~~contract drilling services revenues, amounts constituting reimbursables from customers or amounts attributable to uncommitted option periods under drilling contracts or letters of intent.~~
The amount of actual revenues earned and the actual periods during which revenues are earned may be different than the backlog amounts and backlog periods set forth in the table above for various factors, including, but not limited to, shipyard and maintenance projects, operational downtime, weather conditions, bonuses and other factors that result in applicable dayrates lower than the full contractual operating dayrate. In addition, amounts included in the backlog may change as a result of government-imposed restrictions or delays in the issuance of drilling permits. Furthermore, drilling contracts may be varied or modified by mutual consent or customers may exercise early termination rights contained in some of our drilling contracts or decline to enter into a drilling contract after executing a letter of intent. As a result, our backlog as of any particular date may not be indicative of our actual operating results for the subsequent periods for which the backlog is calculated.
~~As of June 30, 2012, we estimate Shell and Petrobras represented approximately 64% and 16%, respectively, of our backlog.~~
~~Nigerian Operations~~
As previously disclosed, in November 2010 we finalized settlements with the SEC and the Department of Justice as the result of an internal investigation of the legality under the United States Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (“FCPA”) and local laws of certain reimbursement payments made by our Nigerian affiliate to our customs agents in Nigeria. In January 2011, a subsidiary of Noble-Swiss resolved an investigation by the Nigerian Economic and Financial Crimes Commission and the Nigerian Attorney General Office into these same activities. Any additional investigation by these or other agencies could damage our reputation and result in substantial fines, sanctions, civil and/or criminal penalties and curtailment of operations in certain jurisdictions and might adversely affect our business, results of operations or financial condition. Further, resolving any additional investigations could be expensive and consume significant time and attention of our senior management.
~~As of June 30, 2012, our three~~ rigs ~~operating in Nigeria~~ were operating under temporary import permits. To date, we have been successful in obtaining new, or extending existing, temporary import permits. However, there can be no assurance that we will be able to obtain new permits or further extensions of permits necessary to continue the operation of our rigs in Nigeria. If we cannot obtain a new permit or an extension necessary to continue operations of any rig, we may need to cease operations under the drilling contract for such rig and relocate such rig from Nigerian waters. We cannot predict what impact these events may have on any such contract or our business in Nigeria, and we could face additional fines and sanctions in Nigeria. Furthermore, we cannot predict what changes, if any, relating to temporary import permit policies and procedures may be established or implemented in Nigeria in the future, or how any such changes may impact our business there.contract.
Contract Drilling Services
The following table sets forth the operating revenues and the operating costs and expenses for our contract drilling services segment for the three months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011 (in thousands):
In April 2010, the Nigerian Oil and Gas Industry Content Development Bill was signed into law. The law is designed to create Nigerian content in operations and transactions within the Nigerian oil and gas industry. The law sets forth certain requirements for the utilization of Nigerian human resources and goods and services in oil and gas projects and creates a Nigerian Content Development and Monitoring Board (“NCDMB”) to implement and monitor the law and develop regulations pursuant to the law. The NCDMB has indicated that it will require all non-Nigerian offshore drilling companies to reorganize their local operations to include Nigerian indigenous minority interests in the operating assets and to obtain the approval of the NCDMB for future work in Nigeria. The NCDMB actively monitors awards for future work and reviews plans for local content and development of Nigerian interests. The law also established a Nigerian Content Development Fund to fund the implementation of the law, and requires that one percent of the value of every contract awarded in the Nigerian oil and gas industry be paid into the fund. We cannot predict what impact the law may have on our existing or future operations in Nigeria, but the effect on our operations there could be significant.
~~Results of Operations~~
~~For the Three Months Ended June 30, 2012 and 2011~~
Net income attributable to Noble Corporation (“Noble-Swiss”) for the three months ended June 30, 2012 (the “Current Quarter”) was $160 million, or $0.63 per diluted share, on operating revenues of $899 million, compared to net income for the three months ended June 30, 2011 (the “Comparable Quarter”) of $54 million, or $0.21 per diluted share, on operating revenues of $628 million.
The consolidated financial statements of Noble-Swiss include the accounts of Noble-Cayman; Noble-Swiss conducts substantially all of its business through Noble-Cayman and its subsidiaries. As a result, the financial position and results of operations for Noble-Cayman, and the reasons for material changes in the amount of revenue and expense items between 2012 and 2011, would be the same as the information presented below regarding Noble-Swiss in all material respects, except operating income for Noble-Cayman for the three months ended June 30, 2012 was $12 million higher than operating income for Noble-Swiss for the same period. The operating income difference is primarily a result of executive costs directly attributable to Noble-Swiss for operations support and stewardship related services.
~~Rig Utilization, Operating Days and Average Dayrates~~
Operating revenues and operating costs and expenses for our contract drilling services segment are dependent on three primary metrics — rig utilization, operating days and dayrates. The following table sets forth the average rig utilization, operating days and average dayrates for our rig fleet for the three months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011:

   Average Rig Operating Average
   Utilization (1) Days (2) Dayrates
   Three Months Ended
June 30, Three Months Ended
June 30,    Three Months Ended
June 30,
   2012 2011 2012    2011    % Change 2012    2011    % Change
Jackups
   79 % 71 % 3,073       2,797       10 % $ 97,612       $ 80,742       21 %
Semisubmersibles
   88 % 85 % 1,127       1,088       4 % 349,163       269,798       29 %
Drillships
   65 % 58 % 469       317       48 % 329,761       220,953       49 %
Other
   0 % 0 % —         —         —      —         —         —





Total
   76 % 70 % 4,669       4,202       11 % $ 181,663       $ 140,296       29 %






~~(1)~~ ~~Information reflects our policy of reporting on the basis of the number of rigs in our fleet, excluding newbuild rigs under construction.~~
~~(2)~~ ~~Information reflects the number of days that our rigs were operating under contract.~~
~~Contract Drilling Services~~
~~The following table sets forth the operating revenues and the operating costs and expenses for our contract drilling services segment for the three months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 (in thousands):~~
   Three Months Ended
   June 30,    Change    Three Months Ended
September 30,    Change
   2012 2011    $ %    2012    2011    $ %
Operating revenues:

Contract drilling services
   $ 848,237    $ 589,550       $ 258,687    44 %    $ 833,212       $ 704,892       $ 128,320    18 %
Reimbursables (1)
   30,124    22,982       7,142    31 %    27,087       14,646       12,441    85 %
Other
   11    313       (302 ) -96 %    16       8       8    100 %










   $ 878,372    $ 612,845       $ 265,527    43 %    $ 860,315       $ 719,546       $ 140,769    20 %










Operating costs and expenses:

Contract drilling services
   $ 423,502    $ 336,728       $ 86,774    26 %    $ 449,125       $ 358,547       $ 90,578    25 %
Reimbursables (1)
   24,307    17,606       6,701    38 %    20,039       11,362       8,677    76 %
Depreciation and amortization
   180,112    159,843       20,269    13 %    191,638       162,837       28,801    18 %
Selling, general and administrative
   24,835    21,359       3,476    16 %    26,228       27,212       (984 ) -4 %
Loss on impairment
   12,710    —         12,710    **
Gain on contract settlements/extinguishments, net
   (33,255 ) —         (33,255 ) **










   632,211    535,536       96,675    18 %    687,030       559,958       127,072    23 %










Operating income
   $ 246,161    $ 77,309       $ 168,852    218 %    $ 173,285       $ 159,588       $ 13,697    9 %










(1) We record reimbursements from customers for out-of-pocket expenses as operating revenues and the related direct costs as operating expenses. Changes in the amount of these reimbursables generally do not have a material effect on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
** ~~Not a meaningful percentage.~~
~~Operating Revenues~~ — Changes in contract drilling services revenues for the Current Quarter as compared to the Comparable Quarter were driven by increases in both average dayrates and operating days. The 29 percent increase in average dayrates increased revenue by $193 million while the 11 percent increase in operating days increased revenues by approximately $66 million.
The change in contract drilling services revenues relates to our semisubmersibles, drillships and jackups, which generated approximately $100 million, $85 million and $74 million more revenue, respectively, in the Current Quarter.
The 29 percent increase in semisubmersible average dayrates resulted in an $89 million increase in revenues from the Comparable Quarter while the four percent increase in operating days resulted in an additional $11 million increase in revenues. The increase in semisubmersibles revenue is a result of our rigs returning to standard operating dayrates after experiencing lower standby rates due to drilling restrictions in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico in the Comparable Quarter, as well as the~~Noble Paul Romano~~ ~~returning to work after being stacked in the Comparable Quarter. The increase in operating days is primarily from the~~~~Noble Jim Day,~~ ~~the~~~~Noble Homer Ferrington,~~~~the~~~~Noble Paul Romano~~~~and the~~ ~~Noble Clyde Boudreaux~~~~, which all operated at full capacity during the Current Quarter after being off contract for the majority of the Comparable Quarter.~~
The increase in drillship revenues was driven by a 49 percent increase in average dayrates and a 48 percent increase in operating days, resulting in a $51 million and a $34 million increase in revenues, respectively, from the Comparable Quarter. The increase in both average dayrates and operating days was the result of the~~Noble Bully I~~ ~~and~~~~Noble Bully II~~~~, which commenced their contracts with Shell in March 2012 and April 2012, respectively.~~
The 21 percent increase in jackup average dayrates resulted in a $52 million increase in revenues, which was coupled with a 10 percent increase in jackup operating days, resulting in a $22 million increase in revenues from the Comparable Quarter. The increase in average dayrates resulted from improved market conditions in the global shallow water market throughout the jackup fleet. The increase in utilization primarily related to rigs in Mexico and the Middle East, which experienced increased operating days during the Current Quarter.
~~Operating Costs and Expenses~~ — Contract drilling services operating costs and expenses increased $87 million for the Current Quarter as compared to the Comparable Quarter. A portion of the increase is due to the crew-up and operating expenses for the recently completed rigs, which added approximately $25 million in expense during the Current Quarter. Excluding the additional expenses related to these rigs, our contract drilling costs increased $62 million in the Current Quarter from the Comparable Quarter. This change was primarily driven by a $16 million increase in labor, a $14 million increase related to shorebase support, a $7 million increase in insurance costs related to increased premiums on our new policy renewed in March 2012, a $7 million increase in mobilization due to the commencement of amortization of certain rig moves and the demobilization of rigs in Mexico, a $5 million increase in repair and maintenance, a $5 million increase in rig communications, transportation and rotation costs, a $5 million increase in rig catering and other miscellaneous expenses and a $3 million increase in safety, training and regulatory inspections.
~~The increase in depreciation and amortization in the Current Quarter from the Comparable Quarter was primarily attributable to assets placed in service, including the~~~~Noble Bully I~~ ~~and~~~~Noble Bully II~~.
~~Loss on impairment during the Current Quarter related to an impairment charge on our submersible fleet, primarily as a result of the declining market outlook for drilling services for this rig type.~~
Gain on contract settlements/extinguishments during the Current Quarter related to a $28 million gain on the settlement of an action with certain vendors for damages sustained during Hurricane Ike. Additionally, we received $5 million from a claims settlement on the~~Noble David Tinsley, which had experienced a “punch-through” while being positioned on location in 2009.~~
~~Other~~
~~The following table sets forth the operating revenues and the operating costs and expenses for our other services for the three months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011:~~

   Three Months Ended
   June 30,    Change
   2012 2011    $ %
Operating revenues:

Labor contract drilling services
   $ 19,863    $ 14,012       $ 5,851    42 %
Reimbursables (1)
   688    1,140       (452 ) -40 %




   $ 20,551    $ 15,152       $ 5,399    36 %




Operating costs and expenses:

Labor contract drilling services
   $ 11,847    $ 8,750       $ 3,097    35 %
Reimbursables (1)
   663    1,117       (454 ) -41 %
Depreciation and amortization
   3,503    3,276       227    7 %
Selling, general and administrative
   569    273       296    108 %
Loss on impairment
   5,635    —         5,635    **




   22,217    13,416       8,801    66 %




Operating (loss) income
   $ (1,666 ) $ 1,736       $ (3,402 ) **




Operating Revenues—Changes in contract drilling services revenues for the Current Quarter as compared to the Comparable Quarter were driven by increases in both average dayrates and operating days. The 11 percent increase in average dayrates increased revenue by $83 million while the 6 percent increase in operating days increased revenues by approximately $45 million.
The change in contract drilling services revenues relates to our drillships, jackups and semisubmersibles, which generated approximately $83 million, $33 million and $12 million more revenue, respectively, in the Current Quarter.
The increase in drillship revenues was driven by a 79 percent increase in operating days and an 18 percent increase in average dayrates, resulting in a $59 million and a $24 million increase in revenues, respectively, from the Comparable Quarter. The increase in both operating days and average dayrates was the result of theNoble Bully I,Noble Bully IIandNoble Globetrotter I, which commenced their contracts with Shell in March 2012, April 2012, and July 2012, respectively.
The 10 percent increase in jackup average dayrates resulted in a $28 million increase in revenues, which was coupled with a 2 percent increase in jackup operating days, resulting in a $5 million increase in revenues from the Comparable Quarter. The increase in average dayrates resulted from improved market conditions in the global shallow water market throughout the jackup fleet. The slight increase in utilization primarily related to rigs in Mexico, the North Sea and the Middle East, which experienced increased operating days during the Current Quarter.
The 5 percent increase in semisubmersible average dayrates resulted in an $18 million increase in revenues from the Comparable Quarter, which was partially offset by the 2 percent decrease in operating days, which resulted in a $6 million decrease in revenues. The increase in average dayrates is a result of theNoble Paul Romano returning to work at a higher than average dayrate after being stacked in the Comparable Quarter, as well as favorable dayrate changes on new contracts across the semisubmersible fleet. The slight decrease in operating days is primarily from theNoble Dave Beard, theNoble Max Smithand the Noble Clyde Boudreaux, which all experienced mobilization time and/or shipyard time to undergo contract preparations and/or repairs and regulatory inspections during the Current Quarter after operating at full capacity during the Comparable Quarter.
Operating Costs and Expenses—Contract drilling services operating costs and expenses increased $91 million for the Current Quarter as compared to the Comparable Quarter. A portion of the increase is due to the crew-up and operating expenses for the recently completed rigs noted above, which added approximately $40 million in expense during the Current Quarter. Excluding the additional expenses related to these rigs, our contract drilling costs increased $51 million in the Current Quarter from the Comparable Quarter. This change was primarily driven by a $20 million increase in repair and maintenance, a $12 million increase in labor, a $9 million increase related to shorebase support, a $5 million increase in insurance costs related to increased premiums on our new policy renewed in March 2012, a $3 million increase in safety, training and regulatory inspections and a $2 million increase in rig catering and other miscellaneous expenses.
The increase in depreciation and amortization in the Current Quarter from the Comparable Quarter was primarily attributable to assets placed in service, including theNoble Bully I,Noble Bully IIandNoble Globetrotter I.
Other
The following table sets forth the operating revenues and the operating costs and expenses for our other services for the three months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011:
   Three Months Ended
September 30,    Change
   2012    2011    $ %
Operating revenues:

Labor contract drilling services
   $ 22,667       $ 15,564       $ 7,103    46 %
Reimbursables (1)
   1,050       2,792       (1,742 ) -62 %






   $ 23,717       $ 18,356       $ 5,361    29 %






Operating costs and expenses:

Labor contract drilling services
   $ 12,991       $ 8,053       $ 4,938    61 %
Reimbursables (1)
   1,008       2,609       (1,601 ) -61 %
Depreciation and amortization
   3,449       3,376       73    2 %
Selling, general and administrative
   630       324       306    94 %






   18,078       14,362       3,716    26 %






Operating income
   $ 5,639       $ 3,994       $ 1,645    41 %






(1) We record reimbursements from customers for out-of-pocket expenses as operating revenues and the related direct costs as operating expenses. Changes in the amount of these reimbursables generally do not have a material effect on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
** ~~Not a meaningful percentage.~~
~~Operating Revenues and Costs and Expenses~~ — The change in both revenue and expense primarily relate to the commencement of a refurbishment project with our customer, Shell, for one of its rigs to be operated under a labor contract in Alaska, combined with operational increases and foreign currency fluctuations in our Canadian operations.
~~Loss on impairment during the Current Quarter related to an impairment charge on certain corporate assets, as a result of a declining market for, and the potential disposal of, the assets.~~
Operating Revenues and Costs and Expenses—The change in both revenue and expense primarily relate to the commencement of a refurbishment project with our customer, Shell, for one of its rigs to be operated under a labor contract in Alaska.
Other Income and Expenses
Interest Expense, net of amount capitalized—Interest expense, net of amount capitalized, increased $14 million in the Current Quarter as compared to the Comparable Quarter. The increase is a result of the $1.2 billion of senior notes issued in February 2012, coupled with lower capitalized interest due primarily to the completion of construction on three of our newbuild drillships. During the Current Quarter, we capitalized approximately 55 percent of total interest charges versus approximately 74 percent during the Comparable Quarter.
Income Tax Provision—Our income tax provision increased $8 million in the Current Quarter as a result of a higher effective tax rate during the Current Quarter. The increase in the income tax rate was primarily due to fewer discrete tax benefits recognized during the Current Quarter.
For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2012 and 2011
Net income attributable to Noble Corporation (“Noble-Swiss”) for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 (the “Current Period”) was $395 million, or $1.55 per diluted share, on operating revenues of $2.6 billion, compared to net income for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 (the “Comparable Period”) of $244 million, or $0.96 per diluted share, on operating revenues of $1.9 billion.
~~Other Income and Expenses~~
~~Interest Expense, net of amount capitalized~~ — Interest expense, net of amount capitalized, increased $6 million in the Current Quarter as compared to the Comparable Quarter. The increase is a result of the $1.2 billion of senior notes issued in February 2012, partially offset by higher capitalized interest related to the continued construction under our newbuild program.
~~Income Tax Provision~~ — Our income tax provision increased $37 million in the Current Quarter as a result of increased pre-tax income and a higher effective tax rate during the Current Quarter. The increase in pre-tax earnings generated a $24 million increase in tax expense while the increase in the income tax rate during the Current Quarter increased the income tax provision by $13 million. The increase in the income tax rate was primarily due to the net gain from the settlements and impairment charges, primarily subject to tax in the United States, coupled with other discrete tax items recognized during the Current Quarter.
~~For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2012 and 2011~~
Net income attributable to Noble Corporation (“Noble-Swiss”) for the six months ended June 30, 2012 (the “Current Period”) was $280 million, or $1.10 per diluted share, on operating revenues of $1.7 billion, compared to net income for the six months ended June 30, 2011 (the “Comparable Period”) of $109 million, or $0.43 per diluted share, on operating revenues of $1.2 billion.
The consolidated financial statements of Noble-Swiss include the accounts of Noble-Cayman; Noble-Swiss conducts substantially all of its business through Noble-Cayman and its subsidiaries. As a result, the financial position and results of operations for Noble-Cayman, and the reasons for material changes in the amount of revenue and expense items between 2012 and 2011, would be the same as the information presented below regarding Noble-Swiss in all material respects, except operating income for Noble-Cayman for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 was $44 million higher than operating income for Noble-Swiss for the same period. The operating income difference is primarily a result of executive costs directly attributable to Noble-Swiss for operations support and stewardship related services.
Rig Utilization, Operating Days and Average Dayrates
Operating revenues and operating costs and expenses for our contract drilling services segment are dependent on three primary metrics — rig utilization, operating days and dayrates. The following table sets forth the average rig utilization, operating days and average dayrates for our rig fleet for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011:
   Average Rig
Utilization (1) Operating
Days (2) Average
Dayrates
   Nine Months Ended
September 30, Nine Months Ended
September 30,    Nine Months Ended
September 30,
   2012 2011 2012    2011    % Change 2012    2011    % Change
Jackups
   80 % 72 % 9,447       8,407       12 % $ 95,333       $ 84,084       13 %
Semisubmersibles
   86 % 80 % 3,286       3,042       8 % 345,530       288,246       20 %
Drillships
   64 % 61 % 1,344       1,007       33 % 291,448       251,421       16 %
Other
   0 % 0 % —         —         —      —         —         —





Total
   76 % 69 % 14,077       12,456       13 % $ 172,466       $ 147,476       17 %





(1) Information reflects our policy of reporting on the basis of the number of rigs in our fleet, excluding newbuild rigs under construction.
(2) Information reflects the number of days that our rigs were operating under contract.
Contract Drilling Services
The following table sets forth the operating revenues and the operating costs and expenses for our contract drilling services segment for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011 (in thousands):
   Nine Months Ended
September 30, Change
   2012 2011 $ %
Operating revenues:

Contract drilling services
   $ 2,427,759    $ 1,837,047    $ 590,712    32 %
Reimbursables (1)
   91,913    59,232    32,681    55 %
Other
   258    766    (508 ) -66 %


   $ 2,519,930    $ 1,897,045    $ 622,885    33 %


Operating costs and expenses:

Contract drilling services
   $ 1,292,638    $ 1,001,638    $ 291,000    29 %
Reimbursables (1)
   74,519    45,408    29,111    64 %
Depreciation and amortization
   539,698    477,568    62,130    13 %
Selling, general and administrative
   73,907    72,020    1,887    3 %
Loss on impairment
   12,710    —      12,710    **
Gain on contract settlements/extinguishments, net
   (33,255 ) (21,202 ) (12,053 ) 57 %


   1,960,217    1,575,432    384,785    24 %


Operating income
   $ 559,713    $ 321,613    $ 238,100    74 %


(1) We record reimbursements from customers for out-of-pocket expenses as operating revenues and the related direct costs as operating expenses. Changes in the amount of ~~revenue and expense items between 2012 and 2011, would be the same as the information presented below regarding Noble-Swiss in all~~these reimbursables generally do not have a material respects, except operating income for Noble-Cayman for the six months ended June 30, 2012 was $27 million higher than operating income for Noble-Swiss for the same period. The operating income difference is primarilyeffect on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
** Not a ~~result of executive costs directly attributable to Noble-Swiss for operations support and stewardship related services.~~
~~Rig Utilization, Operating Days and Average Dayrates~~
Operating revenues and operating costs and expenses for our contract drilling services segment are dependent on three primary metrics — rig utilization, operating days and dayrates. The following table sets forth the average rig utilization, operating days and average dayrates for our rig fleet for the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011:

   Average Rig Operating Average
   Utilization (1) Days (2) Dayrates
   Six Months Ended
June 30, Six Months Ended
June 30,    Six Months Ended
June 30,
   2012 2011 2012    2011    % Change 2012    2011    % Change
Jackups
   79 % 67 % 6,162       5,178       19 % $ 93,988       $ 80,799       16 %
Semisubmersibles
   87 % 77 % 2,219       1,956       13 % 352,084       273,374       29 %
Drillships
   59 % 62 % 754       678       11 % 310,463       263,905       18 %
Other
   0 % 0 % —         —         —      —         —         —





Total
   75 % 65 % 9,135       7,812       17 % $ 174,555       $ 144,916       20 %





~~(1)~~ ~~Information reflects our policy of reporting on the basis of the number of rigs in our fleet, excluding newbuild rigs under construction.~~meaningful percentage.
~~(2)~~ ~~Information reflects the number of days that our rigs were operating under contract.~~
~~Contract Drilling Services~~
Operating Revenues—Changes in contract drilling services revenues for the Current Period as compared to the Comparable Period were driven by increases in both average dayrates and operating days. The 17 percent increase in average dayrates increased revenues by approximately $352 million while the 13 percent increase in operating days increased revenue by $239 million.
The change in contract drilling services revenues relates to our semisubmersibles, jackups and drillships, which generated approximately $259 million, $194 million and $138 million more revenue, respectively, in the Current Period.
The 20 percent increase in semisubmersible average dayrates resulted in a $188 million increase in revenues from the Comparable Period while the increase in operating days of 8 percent resulted in an additional $71 million increase in revenues. The increase in semisubmersibles revenue is a result of our rigs returning to standard operating dayrates after experiencing lower standby rates due to drilling restrictions in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico in the Comparable Period, as well as theNoble Paul Romano returning to work after being stacked for most of the Comparable Period. The increase in operating days is primarily from theNoble Jim Day, theNoble Homer Ferrington,theNoble Paul Romanoand the Noble Amos Runner, which all operated at full capacity during the Current Period after being off contract for the majority of the Comparable Period.
The 13 percent increase in jackup average dayrates resulted in a $106 million increase in revenues, which was coupled with a 12 percent increase in jackup operating days, resulting in an $88 million increase in revenues from the Comparable Period. The increase in average dayrates resulted from improved market conditions in the global shallow water market throughout the jackup fleet. The increase in utilization primarily related to rigs in Mexico, West Africa and the Middle East, which experienced increased operating days during the Current Period.
The increase in drillship revenues was driven by a 33 percent increase in operating days and a 16 percent increase in average dayrates, resulting in an $84 million and a $54 million increase in revenues, respectively, from the Comparable Period. The increase in both average dayrates and operating days was the result of theNoble Bully I,Noble Bully IIandNoble Globetrotter I, which commenced their contracts with Shell in March 2012, April 2012 and July 2012, respectively. These increases were partially offset by theNoble Phoenix, which completed its shipyard project during the Current Period in preparation for its substitution for theNoble Muravlenko in Brazil and theNoble Leo Segerius, which was undergoing its reliability upgrade project during the Current Period but operated during a portion of the Comparable Period.
Operating Costs and Expenses—Contract drilling services operating costs and expenses increased $291 million for the Current Period as compared to the Comparable Period. A portion of the increase is due to the crew-up and operating expenses for the recently completed rigs noted above, which have added approximately $90 million in expense during the Current Period. Excluding the additional expenses related to these rigs, our contract drilling costs increased $201 million in the Current Period from the Comparable Period. This change was primarily driven by a $59 million increase in labor due to rigs returning, or preparing to return, to work and salary increases effective in the second and third quarters of the prior year, a $37 million increase in shorebase support, a $30 million increase in maintenance and rig-related expense, a $23 million increase in mobilization due to the amortization of certain rig moves and the demobilization of rigs primarily in Mexico, a $14 million increase in rig catering, communications and other miscellaneous expenses, a $14 million increase in insurance costs related to increased premiums on our policy renewed in March 2012, an $11 million increase in safety, training and regulatory inspections, a $5 million increase in rig communications and rental equipment, a $4 million increase in rotation costs and a $4 million increase in fuel and transportation costs.
The increase in depreciation and amortization in the Current Period from the Comparable Period was attributable to assets placed in service during the Current Period, including theNoble Bully I, Noble Bully IIand the Noble Globetrotter I.
Loss on impairment during the Current Period related to an impairment charge on our submersible fleet, primarily as a result of the declining market outlook for drilling services for this rig type.
Gain on contract settlements/extinguishments during the Current Period related to a $28 million gain on the settlement of an action with certain vendors for damages sustained during Hurricane Ike. Additionally, we received $5 million from a claims settlement on theNoble David Tinsley, which had experienced a “punch-through” while being positioned on location in 2009.
Other
The following table sets forth the operating revenues and the operating costs and expenses for our other services for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011:

   Nine Months Ended
September 30,    Change
   2012    2011    $ %
Operating revenues:

Labor contract drilling services
   $ 58,538       $ 43,123       $ 15,415    36 %
Reimbursables (1)
   2,177       4,619       (2,442 ) -53 %






   $ 60,715       $ 47,742       $ 12,973    27 %






Operating costs and expenses:

Labor contract drilling services
   $ 34,070       $ 25,326       $ 8,744    35 %
Reimbursables (1)
   2,099       4,389       (2,290 ) -52 %
Depreciation and amortization
   10,081       9,886       195    2 %
Selling, general and administrative
   1,481       863       618    72 %
Loss on impairment
   5,635       —         5,635    **






   53,366       40,464       12,902    32 %






Operating income
   $ 7,349       $ 7,278       $ 71    1 %






(1) We record reimbursements from customers for out-of-pocket expenses as operating revenues and the ~~operating costs and expenses for our contract drilling services segment for the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 (in thousands):~~

   Six Months Ended
   June 30, Change
   2012 2011 $ %
Operating revenues:

Contract drilling services
   $ 1,594,547    $ 1,132,155    $ 462,392    41 %
Reimbursables (1)
   64,826    44,586    20,240    45 %
Other
   242    758    (516 ) -68 %


   $ 1,659,615    $ 1,177,499    $ 482,116    41 %


Operating costs and expenses:

Contract drilling services
   $ 843,513    $ 643,091    $ 200,422    31 %
Reimbursables (1)
   54,480    34,046    20,434    60 %
Depreciation and amortization
   348,060    314,731    33,329    11 %
Selling, general and administrative
   47,679    44,808    2,871    6 %
Loss on impairment
   12,710    —      12,710    **
Gain on contract settlements/extinguishments, net
   (33,255 ) (21,202 ) (12,053 ) 57 %


   1,273,187    1,015,474    257,713    25 %


Operating income
   $ 386,428    $ 162,025    $ 224,403    138 %


~~(1)~~ ~~We record reimbursements from customers for out-of-pocket expenses as operating revenues and the~~ related direct costs as operating expenses. ~~Changes in the amount of these reimbursables generally do not have a material effect on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.~~
** ~~Not a meaningful percentage.~~
~~Operating Revenues~~ — Changes in ~~contract drilling services revenues for~~ the Current Period as compared to the Comparable Period were driven by increases in both average dayrates and operating days. The 20 percent increase in average dayrates increased revenues by approximately $270 million while the 17 percent increase in operating days increased revenue by $192 million.
The change in contract drilling services revenues relates to our semisubmersibles, jackups and drillships, which generated approximately $247 million, $161 million and $55 million more revenue, respectively, in the Current Period.
~~The 29 percent increase in semisubmersible average dayrates resulted in~~amount of these reimbursables generally do not have a $175 million increase in revenues from the Comparable Period while the increase in operating days of 13 percent resulted in an additional $72 million increase in revenues. The increase in semisubmersibles revenue is a result of our rigs returning to standard operating dayrates after experiencing lower standby rates due to drilling restrictions in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico in the Comparable Period, as well as the~~Noble Paul Romano~~ ~~returning to work after being stacked in the Comparable Period. The increase in operating days is primarily from the~~~~Noble Jim Day,~~ ~~the~~~~Noble Homer Ferrington,~~~~the~~~~Noble Paul Romano~~~~and the~~ ~~Noble Clyde Boudreaux~~~~, which all operated at full capacity during the Current Period after being off contract for the majority of the Comparable Period.~~
The 16 percent increase in jackup average dayrates resulted in an $81 million increase in revenues, which was coupled with a 19 percent increase in operating days, resulting in an $80 million increase in revenues from the Comparable Period. The increase in average dayrates resulted from improved market conditions in the global shallow water market throughout the jackup fleet. The increase in utilization primarily related to rigs in Mexico and the Middle East, which experienced increased operating days during the Current Period.
The increase in drillship revenues was driven by an 18 percent increase in average dayrates and an 11 percent increase in operating days, resulting in a $35 million and a $20 million increase in revenues, respectively, from the Comparable Period. The increase in both average dayrates and operating days was the result of the~~Noble Bully I~~ ~~and~~~~Noble Bully II~~~~, which commenced their contracts with Shell in March 2012 and April 2012, respectively, partially offset by the~~~~Noble Phoenix~~~~, which is completing its shipyard project in anticipation of substitution for the~~~~Noble Muravlenko~~ ~~in Brazil.~~
~~Operating Costs and Expenses~~ — Contract drilling services operating costs and expenses increased $200 million for the Current Period as compared to the Comparable Period. A portion of the increase is due to the crew-up and operating expenses for the recently completed rigs, which have added approximately $53 million in expense during the Current Period. Excluding the additional expenses related to these rigs, our contract drilling costs increased $147 million in the Current Period from the Comparable Period. This change was primarily driven by a $46 million increase in labor, the majority of which is due to salary increases effective in the second quarter of the prior year, a $29 million increase in mobilization due to the amortization of certain rig moves and the demobilization of rigs in Mexico, a $25 million increase related to shorebase support, an $11 million increase in repair and maintenance, a $9 million increase in rig catering and other miscellaneous expenses, a $9 million increase in insurance costs related to increased premiumsmaterial effect on our ~~new policy renewed in March 2012, an $8 million increase in safety, training and regulatory inspections,~~financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
** Not a ~~$5 million increase in rotation costs and a $5 million increase for rig communications and rental equipment.~~
~~The increase in depreciation and amortization in the Current Period from the Comparable Period was primarily attributable to assets placed in service during the Current Period, including the~~~~Noble Bully I~~ ~~and~~~~Noble Bully II~~.
~~Loss on impairment during the Current Period related to an impairment charge on our submersible fleet, primarily as a result of the declining market outlook for drilling services for this rig type.~~
Gain on contract settlements/extinguishments during the Current Period related to a $28 million gain on the settlement of an action with certain vendors for damages sustained during Hurricane Ike. Additionally, we received $5 million from a claims settlement on the~~Noble David Tinsley, which had experienced a “punch-through” while being positioned on location in 2009.~~
~~Other~~
~~The following table sets forth the operating revenues and the operating costs and expenses for our other services for the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011:~~

   Six Months Ended
   June 30,    Change
   2012    2011    $ %
Operating revenues:

Labor contract drilling services
   $ 35,871       $ 27,559       $ 8,312    30 %
Reimbursables (1)
   1,127       1,827       (700 ) -38 %






   $ 36,998       $ 29,386       $ 7,612    26 %






Operating costs and expenses:

Labor contract drilling services
   $ 21,079       $ 17,273       $ 3,806    22 %
Reimbursables (1)
   1,091       1,780       (689 ) -39 %
Depreciation and amortization
   6,632       6,510       122    2 %
Selling, general and administrative
   851       539       312    58 %
Loss on impairment
   5,635       —         5,635    **






   35,288       26,102       9,186    35 %






Operating (loss) income
   $ 1,710       $ 3,284       $ (1,574 ) **






~~(1)~~ We record reimbursements from customers for out-of-pocket expenses as operating revenues and the related direct costs as operating expenses. Changes in the amount of these reimbursables generally do not have a material effect on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.meaningful percentage.
** ~~Not a meaningful percentage.~~
~~Operating Revenues and Costs and Expenses~~ — The change in both revenue and expense primarily relate to the commencement of a refurbishment project with our customer, Shell, for one of its rigs to be operated under a labor contract in Alaska, combined with operational increases and foreign currency fluctuations in our Canadian operations.
Operating Revenues and Costs and Expenses—The change in both revenue and expense primarily relate to the commencement of a refurbishment project with our customer, Shell, for one of its rigs to be operated under a labor contract in Alaska.
Loss on impairment during the Current Period related to an impairment charge on certain corporate assets, as a result of a declining market for, and the potential disposal of, the assets.
Other Income and Expenses
Interest Expense, net of amount capitalized—Interest expense, net of amount capitalized, increased $11 million in the Current Period as compared to the Comparable Period. The increase is primarily the result of the issuance of $1.2 billion in senior notes in February 2012.
Income Tax Provision—Our income tax provision increased $51 million in the Current Period primarily as a result of a higher pre-tax income and effective tax rate during the Current Period. The increase in pre-tax earnings generated a $34 million increase in tax expense while the increase in the income tax rate during the Current Period increased the income tax provision by $17 million. The increase in the income tax rate was primarily due to the net gain from U.S. settlement and impairment charges, coupled with various discrete tax items recognized in the Current Period in other taxing jurisdictions.
~~Loss on impairment during the Current Period related to an impairment charge on certain corporate assets, as a result of a declining market for, and the potential disposal of, the assets.~~
~~Other Income and Expenses~~
~~Interest Expense, net of amount capitalized~~ — Interest expense, net of amount capitalized, decreased $3 million in the Current Period as compared to the Comparable Period. The decrease is a result of higher capitalized interest in the Current Period as compared to the Comparable Period due primarily to the continued construction under our newbuild program, which was partially offset by the issuance of $1.2 billion in senior notes in February 2012. During the Current Period, we capitalized approximately 71 percent of total interest charges versus approximately 62 percent during the Comparable Period.
~~Income Tax Provision~~ — Our income tax provision increased $43 million in the Current Period primarily as a result of a higher pre-tax income and effective tax rate during the Current Period. The increase in pre-tax earnings generated a $42 million increase in tax expense while the increase in the income tax rate during the Current Period increased the income tax provision by $1 million. The increase in the income tax rate was primarily due to the net gain from the settlements and impairment charges, primarily subject to tax in the United States, coupled with other discrete tax items recognized in the Current Period.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Overview
Net cash from operating activities for the Current Period increased to ~~$536~~$932 million from ~~$233~~$459 million in the Comparable Period. The increase in net cash from operating activities in the Current Period was primarily attributable to a significant increase in net income. We had working capital of ~~$481~~$462 million and $232 million at ~~June~~September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively. As a result of our $1.2 billion debt offering in February 2012 ~~and~~partially offset by a reduction in borrowings outstanding ~~borrowings of $150 million~~ on our Credit Facilities, ~~at June 30, 2012,~~ total debt as a percentage of total debt plus equity increased to 3536 percent at ~~June~~September 30, 2012 from 34 percent at December 31, 2011.
At June 30, 2012, we had a total contract drilling services backlog of approximately $14.4 billion. Our backlog as of June 30, 2012 reflects a commitment of 79 percent of available operating days for the remainder of 2012 and 61 percent for 2013. See additional information regarding our backlog at “Contract Drilling Services Backlog.”
Our principal source of capital ~~resource~~ in the Current Period was cash generated from our $1.2 billion senior notes offering and net cash from operating activities of ~~$536~~$932 million. Cash generated during the Current Period was primarily used to repay borrowings outstanding under our Credit Facilities and to fund our capital expenditure program.
Our currently anticipated future cash flow needs include the following:

committed capital expenditures, including expenditures for newbuild projects currently underway;

normal recurring operating expenses;

discretionary capital expenditures, including various capital upgrades;

~~potential newbuild projects and acquisitions;~~
payments of dividends; and

repayment of maturing debt.
We currently expect to fund these cash flow needs with cash generated by our operations, cash on hand and borrowings under our existing Credit ~~Facilities.~~Facilities and commercial paper program.
At September 30, 2012, we had a total contract drilling services backlog of approximately $14.8 billion. Our backlog as of September 30, 2012 reflects a commitment of 83 percent of available operating days for the remainder of 2012 and 69 percent for 2013. See additional information regarding our backlog at “Contract Drilling Services Backlog.”
Capital Expenditures
Our primary use of available liquidity during 2012 is for capital expenditures. Capital expenditures, including capitalized interest, totaled ~~$665 million~~$1.2 billion and ~~$1.4~~$2.0 billion for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively.
At ~~June~~September 30, 2012, we had 11 rigs under construction, and capital expenditures, excluding capitalized interest, for new construction during the first ~~six~~nine months of 2012 totaled ~~$162~~$441 million, as follows (in millions):

Rig type/name

Currently under construction

Drillships

Noble Globetrotter II
   $ 187.3
Noble Don Taylor (formerly HHI Drillship I)
   $ 56.2       63.0
Noble Globetrotter II
   37.7
Noble Bob Douglas (formerly HHI Drillship II)
   4.2       57.0
Noble Sam Croft (formerly HHI Drillship III)
   1.8       2.4
HHI Drillship IV
   1.2       2.4
Jackups

Noble Sam Turner (formerly Noble Jackup IV)
   47.2
Noble Regina Allen (formerly Noble Jackup I)
   3.4       6.0
Noble Mick O’Brien (formerly Noble Jackup II)
   2.7       4.0
Noble Houston Colbert (formerly Noble Jackup III)
   1.8       3.0
Noble Sam Turner (formerly Noble Jackup IV)
   1.5
Noble Tom Prosser (formerly Noble Jackup V)
   1.5       1.7
Noble Jackup VI
   1.5       1.6
Recently completed construction projects

Noble Globetrotter I
   41.5
Noble Bully II
   17.9       18.7
Noble Globetrotter I
   25.4
Noble Bully I
   4.7       4.7




Total Newbuild Capital Expenditures
   $ 161.5       $ 440.5




In addition to the newbuild expenditures noted above, capital expenditures for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2012 consisted of the following:

$~~327~~548 million for major projects, including ~~$34~~$50 million in subsea related expenditures and ~~$24~~$29 million to upgrade two drillships currently operating in Brazil;

$99150 million for other capitalized expenditures, including upgrades and replacements to drilling equipment ~~upgrades which~~that generally have a useful ~~lives~~life ranging from 3 to 5 years; and

$77108 million in capitalized interest.
Our total capital expenditure estimate for 2012 is approximately ~~$1.9~~$1.8 billion, including capitalized interest, which may fluctuate as a result of the timing of completion of ongoing projects.
In connection with our capital expenditure program, as of ~~June~~September 30, 2012, we had outstanding commitments, including shipyard and purchase commitments, for approximately ~~$3.1~~$3.0 billion, of which we expect to spend approximately ~~$1.6~~$1.8 billion within the next twelve months.
From time to time we consider possible projects that would require expenditures that are not included in our capital budget, and such unbudgeted expenditures could be significant. In addition, we will continue to evaluate acquisitions of drilling units from time to time. Other factors that could cause actual capital expenditures to materially exceed expected amounts include delays and cost overruns in shipyards (including costs attributable to labor shortages), shortages of equipment, latent damage or deterioration to hull, equipment and machinery in excess of engineering estimates and assumptions, changes in governmental regulations and requirements and changes in design criteria or specifications during repair or construction.
Dividends
Our most recent quarterly payment to shareholders, totaling approximately ~~$36~~$33 million (or ~~0.13 CHF~~$0.13 per share)~~, in the form of a par value reduction,~~ was declared on ~~April~~July 27, 2012 and paid on ~~May~~August 16, 2012 to holders of record on ~~May 7,~~August 6, 2012. This payment represented the ~~final~~first tranche of our previously approved payment to shareholders ~~in the form of a par value reduction.~~discussed below.
In April 2012, our shareholders approved the payment of a dividend ~~funded from our capital contribution reserve~~ aggregating $0.52 per share to be paid in four equal installments ~~scheduled for~~the first of which was paid in August 2012, with the remaining three installments to be paid in November 2012, February 2013 and May ~~2013.~~2013, respectively. These dividends will require us to make cash payments of approximately ~~$66~~$33 million in the fourth quarter of 2012, based on the number of shares currently outstanding. ~~In connection with this approval and the resulting obligation to shareholders,~~As of September 30, 2012, we ~~recorded~~had $100 million of dividends payable ~~of approximately $133 million during the second quarter of 2012.~~outstanding on this obligation. Any additional issuances of shares would further increase our obligation.
The declaration and payment of dividends in the future by Noble-Swiss or the distributions of capital, including returns of capital in the form of par value reductions, require authorization of the shareholders of Noble-Swiss. The amount of such dividends, distributions and returns of capital will depend on our results of operations, financial condition, cash requirements, future business prospects, contractual restrictions and other factors deemed relevant by our Board of Directors and shareholders.
Credit Facilities and Long-Term Debt
During June 2012, we replaced our $575 million credit facility ~~which was~~ scheduled to mature in 2013, with a new $1.2 billion credit facility, which matures in 2017. ~~We continue to maintain~~The new facility, combined with our existing $600 million credit facility ~~which~~that matures in 2015, ~~which combined with our new facility,~~ gives us a total borrowing capacity under the two facilities (together referred to as the “Credit Facilities”) of $1.8 billion. The covenants and events of default under the Credit Facilities are substantially similar, and each facility contains a covenant that limits our ratio of debt to total tangible capitalization, as defined in the Credit Facilities, to 0.60. At ~~June~~September 30, 2012, our ratio of debt to total tangible capitalization was ~~0.35.~~less than 0.36. We were in compliance with all covenants under the Credit Facilities as of ~~June~~September 30, 2012.
The Credit Facilities provide us with the ability to issue up to $375 million in letters of credit in the aggregate. ~~While the~~The issuance of letters of credit does not increase our borrowings outstanding under the Credit Facilities, but it does reduce the amount available. At ~~June~~September 30, 2012, we had no letters of credit outstanding under the Credit Facilities. ~~We believe that~~
During September 2012, we ~~maintain good relationships with our lenders~~established a commercial paper program, which will allow us to issue up to $1.8 billion in unsecured commercial paper notes. Amounts issued under the commercial paper program are supported by the unused committed capacity under our Credit Facilities and, as such, are classified as long-term on our balance sheet. Subsequent to September 30, 2012, we ~~believe that our lenders have~~began issuing notes under the ~~liquidity~~program and ~~capability to perform should the need arise for us to draw on the Credit Facilities.~~had outstanding notes totaling $328 million as of October 31, 2012.
In February 2012, we issued, through our indirect wholly-owned subsidiary, Noble Holding International Limited (“NHIL”), $1.2 billion aggregate principal amount of senior notes in three separate tranches, with $300 million of 2.50% Senior Notes due 2017, $400 million of 3.95% Senior Notes due 2022, and $500 million of 5.25% Senior Notes due 2042. The weighted average coupon of all three tranches is 4.13%. The net proceeds of approximately $1.19 billion, after expenses, were primarily used to repay the then outstanding balance on our Credit Facilities.
Our 5.875% Senior Notes mature during the second quarter of 2013. We anticipate using availability under our Credit Facilities to repay the outstanding balance; therefore, we ~~have continued~~continue to report the balance as long-term ~~on our June~~at September 30, ~~2012 Consolidated Balance Sheet.~~2012.
The indentures governing our outstanding senior unsecured notes contain covenants that place restrictions on certain merger and consolidation transactions, unless we are the surviving entity or the other party assumes the obligations under the indenture, and on the ability to sell or transfer all or substantially all of our assets. In addition, there are restrictions on incurring or assuming certain liens and sale and lease-back transactions. At ~~June~~September 30, 2012, we were in compliance with all our debt covenants. We continually monitor compliance with the covenants under our Credit Facilities and senior notes and, based on our expectations for 2012, expect to remain in compliance during the year.
At ~~June~~September 30, 2012, we had letters of credit of ~~$50~~$36 million and performance and tax assessment bonds totaling ~~$306~~$318 million supported by surety bonds outstanding. ~~Of the letters of credit outstanding, $19 million were issued to support bank bonds in connection with our drilling units in Nigeria.~~ Additionally, certain of our subsidiaries issue, from time to time, guarantees of the temporary import status of rigs or equipment imported into certain countries in which we operate. These guarantees are issued in lieu of payment of custom, value added or similar taxes in those countries.
Our long-term debt was ~~$4.4~~$4.6 billion at ~~June~~September 30, 2012 as compared to $4.1 billion at December 31, 2011. The increase in debt is a result of the issuance of $1.2 billion aggregate principal amount of senior notes, partially offset by the net repayment of ~~$825~~$630 million on the Credit ~~Facilities.~~Facilities during the current year. For additional information on our long-term debt, see Note 8 to our consolidated financial statements.
New Accounting Pronouncements
In May 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2011-04, which amends FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 820, “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures.” This amended guidance clarifies the wording used to describe many of the requirements in accounting literature for measuring fair value and for disclosing information about fair value measurements. The goal of the amendment is to create consistency between the United States and international accounting standards. The guidance is effective for annual and interim reporting periods beginning on or after December 15, 2011. Our adoption of this guidance did not have a material impact on our financial condition, results of operations, cash flows or financial disclosures.
In June 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-05, which amends ASC Topic 220, “Comprehensive Income.” This ASU allows an entity to present the total of comprehensive income, the components of net income, and the components of other comprehensive income either in a single continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two separate but consecutive statements. The amendment no longer allows an entity to show changes to other comprehensive income solely through the statement of equity. For publicly traded entities, the guidance is effective for annual and interim reporting periods beginning on or after December 15, 2011. In December 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-12, which defers only those changes in ASU 2011-05 that relate to the presentation of reclassification adjustments. Our adoption of this guidance did not have a material impact on our financial condition, results of operations, cash flows or financial disclosures.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
~~Item 3.~~ ~~Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk~~
Market risk is the potential for loss from a change in the value of a financial instrument as a result of fluctuations in interest rates, currency exchange rates or equity prices, as further described below.
Interest Rate Risk
We are subject to market risk exposure related to changes in interest rates on borrowings under the Credit Facilities. Interest on borrowings under the Credit Facilities is at an agreed upon percentage point spread over LIBOR, or a base rate stated in the agreements. At ~~June~~September 30, 2012, we had ~~$150~~$345 million outstanding under the Credit Facilities. Assuming our current level of debt, a change in LIBOR rates of ~~one~~1 percent would increase our interest charges by approximately $2$3 million per year.
We maintain certain debt instruments at a fixed rate whose fair value will fluctuate based on changes in interest rates and market perceptions of our credit risk. The fair value of our long-term debt was ~~$4.7~~$5.1 billion and $4.3 billion at ~~June~~September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively. The increase was primarily a result of our issuance of $1.2 billion in debt in February 2012, partially offset by the net repayment of ~~$825~~$630 million on our Credit Facilities, coupled with changes in fair value related to changes in interest rates and market perceptions of our credit risk.
Foreign Currency Risk
As a multinational company, we conduct business worldwide. Our functional currency is primarily the U.S. dollar, which is consistent with the oil and gas industry. However, outside the United States, a portion of our expenses are incurred in local currencies. Therefore, when the U.S. dollar weakens (strengthens) in relation to the currencies of the countries in which we operate, our expenses reported in U.S. dollars will increase (decrease).
We are exposed to risks on future cash flows to the extent that local currency expenses exceed revenues denominated in local currency that are different than the functional currency. To help manage this potential risk, we periodically enter into derivative instruments to manage our exposure to fluctuations in currency exchange rates, and we may conduct hedging activities in future periods to mitigate such exposure. These contracts are primarily accounted for as cash flow hedges, with the effective portion of changes in the fair value of the hedge recorded on the Consolidated Balance Sheet and in “Accumulated other comprehensive loss” (“AOCL”). Amounts recorded in AOCL are reclassified into earnings in the same period or periods that the hedged item is recognized in earnings. The ineffective portion of changes in the fair value of the hedged item is recorded directly to earnings. We have documented policies and procedures to monitor and control the use of derivative instruments. We do not engage in derivative transactions for speculative or trading purposes, nor are we a party to leveraged derivatives.
At ~~June~~September 30, 2012, we had no outstanding derivative contracts. Depending on market conditions, we may elect to utilize short-term forward currency contracts in the future.
Market Risk
We have a U.S. noncontributory defined benefit pension plan that covers certain salaried employees and a U.S. noncontributory defined benefit pension plan that covers certain hourly employees, whose initial date of employment is prior to August 1, 2004 (collectively referred to as our “qualified U.S. plans”). These plans are governed by the Noble Drilling Corporation Retirement Trust. The benefits from these plans are based primarily on years of service and, for the salaried plan, employees’ compensation near retirement. These plans are designed to qualify under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”), and our funding policy is consistent with funding requirements of ERISA and other applicable laws and regulations. We make cash contributions, or utilize credits available to us, for the qualified U.S. plans when required. The benefit amount that can be covered by the qualified U.S. plans is limited under ERISA and the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 as amended. Therefore, we maintain an unfunded, nonqualified excess benefit plan designed to maintain benefits for all employees at the formula level in the qualified salary U.S. ~~plans.~~plan.
In addition to the U.S. plans, each of Noble Drilling (Land Support) Limited, Noble Enterprises Limited and Noble Drilling (Nederland) B.V., all indirect, wholly-owned subsidiaries of Noble-Swiss, maintains a pension plan that covers all of its salaried employees. Benefits are based on credited service and employees’ compensation near retirement, as defined by the plans.
Changes in market asset values related to the pension plans noted above could have a material impact upon our “Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income” and could result in material cash expenditures in future periods.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
~~Item 4.~~ ~~Controls and Procedures~~
David W. Williams, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of Noble-Swiss, and James A. MacLennan, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Noble-Swiss, have evaluated the disclosure controls and procedures of Noble-Swiss as of the end of the period covered by this report. On the basis of this evaluation, Mr. Williams and Mr. MacLennan have concluded that Noble-Swiss’ disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of ~~June~~September 30, 2012. Noble-Swiss’ disclosure controls and procedures are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by Noble-Swiss in the reports that it files with or submits to the SEC is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms and is accumulated and communicated to management as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
David W. Williams, President and Chief Executive Officer of Noble-Cayman, and Dennis J. Lubojacky, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Noble-Cayman, have evaluated the disclosure controls and procedures of Noble-Cayman as of the end of the period covered by this report. On the basis of this evaluation, Mr. Williams and Mr. Lubojacky have concluded that Noble-Cayman’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of ~~June~~September 30, 2012. Noble-Cayman’s disclosure controls and procedures are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by Noble-Cayman in the reports that it files with or submits to the SEC is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms and is accumulated and communicated to management as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
There was no change in either ~~Noble-Swiss��~~Noble-Swiss’ or Noble-Cayman’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the quarter ended ~~June~~September 30, 2012 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the internal control over financial reporting of each of Noble-Swiss or Noble-Cayman, respectively.
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
~~Item 1.~~ ~~Legal Proceedings~~
Information regarding legal proceedings is set forth in Notes 6, 7 and 13 to our consolidated financial statements included in Item 1 of Part I of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and is incorporated herein by reference.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
~~Item 2.~~ ~~Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds~~
The following table sets forth for the periods indicated certain information with respect to purchases of shares by Noble-Swiss:

      Total Number of    Maximum Number
      Shares Purchased    of Shares that May
   Total Number    Average as Part of Publicly    Yet Be Purchased
   of Shares    Price Paid Announced Plans    Under the Plans
Period
   Purchased    per Share or Programs    or Programs
April 2012
   1,532       $ 37.96 ⁽¹⁾ —         6,769,891
May 2012
   156       $ 37.94 ⁽¹⁾ —         6,769,891
June 2012
   103,693       $ 31.34 ⁽¹⁾ —         6,769,891
Period
   Total Number
of Shares
Purchased    Average
Price Paid
per Share Total Number of
Shares Purchased
as Part of Publicly
Announced Plans
or Programs    Maximum Number
of Shares that May
Yet Be Purchased
Under the Plans or
Programs
July 2012
   16,997       $ 37.46 ⁽¹⁾ —         6,769,891
August 2012
   835       $ 38.25 ⁽¹⁾ —         6,769,891
September 2012
   —         n/a    —         6,769,891

(1) Amounts represent shares surrendered by employees for withholding taxes payable upon the vesting of restricted stock or exercise of stock options and were not made pursuant to the share repurchase program which our Board of Directors authorized and adopted. Our repurchase program has no date of expiration.
Item 6. Exhibits
~~Item 6.~~ ~~Exhibits~~
The information required by this Item 6 is set forth in the Index to Exhibits accompanying this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and is incorporated herein by reference.
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
Noble Corporation, a Swiss corporation

~~Noble Corporation~~~~, a Swiss corporation~~
/s/ David W. Williams
~~August 6, 2012~~
David W. Williams
~~Date~~
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)

November 6, 2012
Date
/s/ James A. MacLennan
James A. MacLennan
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)

~~(Principal Financial Officer)~~
Noble Corporation, a Cayman Islands company
/s/ David W. Williams
~~August 6, 2012~~
David W. Williams
~~Date~~
President and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)

November 6, 2012
Date
/s/ Dennis J. Lubojacky
Dennis J. Lubojacky
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)

Index to Exhibits

Exhibit

Number

Exhibit
2.1    Agreement and Plan of Merger, Reorganization and Consolidation, dated as of December 19, 2008, among Noble Corporation, a Swiss corporation (“Noble-Swiss”), Noble Corporation, a Cayman Islands company (“Noble-Cayman”), and Noble Cayman Acquisition Ltd. (filed as Exhibit 1.1 to Noble-Cayman’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on December 22, 2008 and incorporated herein by reference).
2.2    Amendment No. 1 to Agreement and Plan of Merger, Reorganization and Consolidation, dated as of February 4, 2009, among Noble-Swiss, Noble-Cayman and Noble Cayman Acquisition Ltd. (filed as Exhibit 2.2 to Noble-Cayman’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on February 4, 2009 and incorporated herein by reference).
3.1    Articles of Association of ~~Noble-Swiss.~~Noble-Swiss (filed as Exhibit 3.1 to Noble-Swiss’ Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on August 6, 2012 and incorporated herein by reference).
3.2    By-laws of Noble-Swiss (filed as Exhibit 3.2 to Noble-Swiss’ Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March 27, 2009 and incorporated herein by reference).
3.3    Memorandum and Articles of Association of Noble-Cayman (filed as Exhibit 3.1 to Noble-Cayman’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March 30, 2009 and incorporated herein by reference).
~~4.1~~10.1    ~~Revolving Credit~~Form of Commercial Paper Dealer Agreement dated as of ~~June 8,~~September 19, 2012 ~~among~~between Noble Corporation, a Cayman Islands ~~company; the Lenders from time to time parties thereto; Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Administrative Agent, Swingline Lender~~company, Noble Holding International Limited, a Cayman Islands company, Noble Drilling Corporation, a Delaware corporation, and an Issuing Bank; SunTrust Bank, as Syndication Agent; Barclays Bank PLC, HSBC Securities (USA) Inc. and The Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ, Ltd., as Co-Documentation Agents; and Wells Fargo Securities, LLC, SunTrust Robinson Humphrey, Inc., Barclays Bank PLC, HSBC Securities (USA) Inc. and The Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ, Ltd., as Joint Lead Arrangers and Joint Lead Bookrunnerscertain investment banks (filed as Exhibit ~~4.1~~10.1 to Noble-Swiss’ Current Report on Form 8-K filed on ~~June 11,~~September 19, 2012 and incorporated herein by reference).
~~4.2~~10.2    ~~Guaranty~~Form of Issuing and Paying Agent Agreement dated as of ~~June 8,~~September 19, 2012 between Noble ~~Drilling~~ Corporation, a ~~Delaware corporation,~~Cayman Islands company and ~~Wells Fargo Bank, National Association~~the Issuing and Paying Agent (filed as Exhibit ~~4.2~~10.2 to Noble-Swiss’ Current Report on Form 8-K filed on ~~June 11, 2012 and incorporated herein by reference).~~
~~4.3~~ Guaranty Agreement dated as of June 8, 2012 between Noble Holding International Limited, a Cayman Islands company, and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association (filed as Exhibit 4.3 to Noble-Swiss’ Current Report on Form 8-K filed on June 11, 2012 and incorporated herein by reference).
10.1* ~~Amended and Restated 1991 Stock Option and Restricted Stock Plan (filed as Exhibit 10.2 to Noble Cayman’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on April 30,~~September 19, 2012 and incorporated herein by reference).
31.1    Certification of David W. Williams pursuant to the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(a), for Noble-Swiss and for Noble-Cayman.
31.2    Certification of James A. MacLennan pursuant to the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, Rule 13a- 14(a) or Rule 15d-14(a), for Noble-Swiss.
31.3    Certification of Dennis J. Lubojacky pursuant to the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, Rule 13a- 14(a) or Rule 15d-14(a), for Noble-Cayman.
32.1+    Certification of David W. Williams pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, for Noble-Swiss and for Noble-Cayman.
32.2+    Certification of James A. MacLennan pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, for Noble-Swiss.
32.3+    Certification of Dennis J. Lubojacky pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, for Noble-Cayman.
101+    Interactive Data File

* Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement
+ Furnished in accordance with Item 601(b)(32)(ii) of Regulation S-K.

54