(Former Name, Former Address and Former Fiscal Year, if Changed Since Last Report)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (Section 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x ¨ No¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “large accelerated filer” and “accelerated filer” Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No x

On ~~October 23, 2012,~~May 8, 2013, the number of shares set forth below was outstanding with respect to each of the issuer’s classes of common stock:

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME AND OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME – UNAUDITED


	September 30,			December 31,			March 31,			December 31,
	2012			2011			2013			2012
	(Unaudited)						(Unaudited)
Assets
Cash and due from banks	$	88,220		$	79,248		$	80,440		$	111,938
Interest-bearing deposits		60,971			31,310			86,003			94,410
Federal funds sold and securities purchased under resale agreements								25,000			—
Securities, available-for-sale		107,288			143,710			87,527			100,195
Loans held for sale		2,818,622			2,080,081			2,577,830			3,175,272
Loans held for sale from discontinued operations		304			393			301			302
Loans held for investment (net of unearned income)		6,549,089			5,572,371			6,920,011			6,785,535
Less: Allowance for loan losses		73,722			70,295			75,000			74,337

Loans held for investment, net		6,475,367			5,502,076			6,845,011			6,711,198
Premises and equipment, net		11,280			11,457			11,249			11,445
Accrued interest receivable and other assets		299,582			268,863			287,771			316,201
Goodwill and intangible assets, net		20,032			20,480			19,734			19,883

Total assets	$	9,881,666		$	8,137,618		$	10,020,866		$	10,540,844

Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity
Liabilities:
Deposits:
Non-interest bearing	$	2,114,279		$	1,751,944		$	2,628,446		$	2,535,375
Interest bearing		4,171,405			3,324,040			4,739,067			4,576,120
Interest bearing in foreign branches		431,895			480,273			378,318			329,309

Total deposits		6,717,579			5,556,257			7,745,831			7,440,804

Accrued interest payable		1,039			599			1,013			650
Other liabilities		90,067			82,909			98,287			91,581
Federal funds purchased		473,330			412,249			452,998			273,179
Repurchase agreements		22,788			23,801			35,095			23,936
Other borrowings		1,550,051			1,332,066			450,041			1,650,046
Subordinated notes		111,000			—			111,000			111,000
Trust preferred subordinated debentures		113,406			113,406			113,406			113,406

Total liabilities		9,079,260			7,521,287			9,007,671			9,704,602

Stockholders’ equity:
Preferred stock, $.01 par value, $1,000 liquidation value:
Authorized shares – 10,000,000
Preferred stock								150,000			—
Common stock, $.01 par value:
Authorized shares – 100,000,000
Issued shares – 40,580,700 and 37,666,708 at September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011		406			376
Issued shares – 40,771,831 and 40,727,996 at March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively								408			407
Additional paid-in capital		447,104			349,458			444,477			450,116
Retained earnings		351,026			261,783			415,517			382,455
Treasury stock (shares at cost: 417 at September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011)		(8	)		(8	)
Treasury stock (shares at cost: 417 at March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012)								(8	)		(8	)
Accumulated other comprehensive income, net of taxes		3,878			4,722			2,801			3,272

Total stockholders’ equity		802,406			616,331			1,013,195			836,242

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	9,881,666		$	8,137,618		$	10,020,866		$	10,540,844


	Preferred Stock				Common Stock				Additional Paid-in Capital				Retained Earnings			Treasury Stock							Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income, Net of Taxes				Total				Preferred Stock						Common Stock				Additional Paid-in Capital			Retained Earnings				Treasury Stock							Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income, Net of Taxes				Total
	Shares		Amount		Shares		Amount					Shares					Amount																											Retained Earnings											Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income, Net of Taxes				Total

Balance at December 31, 2010		—	$	—		36,957,104	$	369	Additional Paid-in Capital		$	336,796	Retained Earnings		$	185,807			(417	)		$	Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income, Net of Taxes			(8	Total			)		$	5,355		$	528,319
Comprehensive income:
Net income (unaudited)		—		—		—		—		—				50,236			—			—				—				50,236
Change in unrealized gain on available-for-sale securities, net of taxes of $121 (unaudited)		—		—		—		—		—				—			—			—				(225	)			(225	)

Total comprehensive income (unaudited)																												50,011
Tax expense related to exercise of stock-based awards (unaudited)		—		—		—		—		2,196				—			—			—				—				2,196
Stock-based compensation expense recognized in earnings (unaudited)		—		—		—		—		5,802				—			—			—				—				5,802
Issuance of stock related to stock-based awards (unaudited)		—		—		501,075		5		1,611				—			—			—				—				1,616

Balance at September 30, 2011 (unaudited)		—	$	—		37,458,179	$	374	$	346,405			$	236,043			(417	)	$	(8	)		$	5,130			$	587,944
																															Shares			Amount			Shares		Amount		Additional Paid-in Capital		Additional Paid-in Capital			Retained Earnings				Shares			Amount				Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income, Net of Taxes				Total
																																														Retained Earnings											Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income, Net of Taxes				Total
Balance at December 31, 2011		—	$	—		37,666,708	$	376	$	349,458			$	261,783			(417	)	$	(8	)		$	4,722			$	616,331				—		$	—			37,666,708	$	376	$	349,458	Additional Paid-in Capital				$	261,783			(417	)		$	(8	)		$	4,722			$	616,331
Comprehensive income:
Net income (unaudited)		—		—		—		—		—				89,243			—			—				—				89,243				—			—			—		—		—			27,085				—			—				—				27,085
Change in unrealized gain on available-for-sale securities, net of taxes of $454 (unaudited)		—		—		—		—		—				—			—			—				(844	)			(844	)
Change in unrealized gain on available-for-sale securities, net of taxes of $101 (unaudited)																																—			—			—		—		—			—				—			—				(187	)			(187	)

Total comprehensive income (unaudited)																																																												26,898
Tax benefit related to exercise of stock-based awards (unaudited)																																—			—			—		—		1,521			—				—			—				—				1,521
Stock-based compensation expense recognized in earnings (unaudited)																																—			—			—		—		1,952			—				—			—				—				1,952
Issuance of stock related to stock-based awards (unaudited)																																—			—			245,763		3		636			—				—			—				—				639

Balance at March 31, 2012 (unaudited)																																—		$	—			37,912,471	$	379	$	353,567		$	288,868				(417	)	$	(8	)		$	4,535			$	647,341


Balance at December 31, 2012																																—		$	—			40,727,996	$	407	$	450,116		$	382,455				(417	)	$	(8	)		$	3,272			$	836,242
Comprehensive income:
Net income (unaudited)																																—			—			—		—		—			33,143				—			—				—				33,143
Change in unrealized gain on available-for-sale securities, net of taxes of $254 (unaudited)																																—			—			—		—		—			—				—			—				(471	)			(471	)

Total comprehensive income (unaudited)																												88,399																																32,672
Tax expense related to exercise of stock-based awards (unaudited)		—		—		—		—		5,773				—			—			—				—				5,773				—			—			—		—		(1,362	)		—				—			—				—				(1,362	)
Stock-based compensation expense recognized in earnings (unaudited)		—		—		—		—		4,648				—			—			—				—				4,648				—			—			—		—		905			—				—			—				—				905
Issuance of preferred stock (unaudited)																																6,000,000			150,000			—		—		(4,922	)		—				—			—				—				145,078
Preferred stock dividend (unaudited)																																—			—			—		—		—			(81	)			—			—				—				(81	)
Issuance of stock related to stock-based awards (unaudited)		—		—		613,992		7		261				—			—			—				—				268				—			—			43,835		1		(260	)		—				—			—				—				(259	)
Issuance of stock (unaudited)		—		—		2,300,000		23		86,964				—			—			—				—				86,987

Balance at September 30, 2012 (unaudited)		—	$	—		40,580,700	$	406	$	447,104			$	351,026			(417	)	$	(8	)		$	3,878			$	802,406
Balance at March 31, 2013 (unaudited)																																6,000,000		$	150,000			40,771,831	$	408	$	444,477		$	415,517				(417	)	$	(8	)		$	2,801			$	1,013,195


	Nine months ended September 30,						Three months ended March 31,
	2012			2011			2013			2012
Operating activities
Net income from continuing operations	$	89,274		$	50,357		$	33,144		$	27,081
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash used in operating activities:
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:
Provision for credit losses		7,000			22,500			2,000			3,000
Depreciation and amortization		3,569			4,114			1,225			1,186
Amortization and accretion on securities		31			63			7			14
Bank owned life insurance (BOLI) income		(1,658	)		(1,595	)		(498	)		(521	)
Stock-based compensation expense		9,886			5,802			1,944			1,952
Tax benefit from stock option exercises		5,773			2,196
Tax benefit (expense) from stock-based award exercises								(1,362	)		1,521
Excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation arrangements		(16,493	)		(6,274	)		3,890			(4,345	)
Originations of loans held for sale		(36,239,859	)		(17,790,459	)		(13,173,476	)		(10,334,353	)
Proceeds from sales of loans held for sale		35,501,320			17,075,496			13,770,918			10,159,156
Gain on sale of assets		(357	)		(145	)		(52	)		(33	)
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Accrued interest receivable and other assets		(41,625	)		(59,388	)		27,725			(2,555	)
Accrued interest payable and other liabilities		2,814			15,026			6,200			(5,134	)

Net cash used in operating activities of continuing operations		(680,325	)		(682,307	)
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities of discontinued operations		57			(26	)
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities of continuing operations								671,665			(153,031	)
Net cash provided by operating activities of discontinued operations								1			7

Net cash used in operating activities		(680,268	)		(682,333	)
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities								671,666			(153,024	)

Investing activities
Purchases of available-for-sale securities		(6	)		—			—			(6	)
Maturities and calls of available-for-sale securities		14,260			7,575			6,185			12,420
Principal payments received on available-for-sale securities		20,839			34,544			5,318			7,167
Net increase in loans held for investment		(980,292	)		(617,762	)		(135,812	)		(221,284	)
Purchase of premises and equipment, net		(2,505	)		(2,539	)		(709	)		(885	)
Proceeds from sale of foreclosed assets		12,482			19,741			1,518			1,267
Cash paid for acquisition		—			(11,482	)

Net cash used in investing activities of continuing operations		(935,222	)		(569,923	)		(123,500	)		(201,321	)

Financing activities
Net increase in deposits		1,161,322			31,062			305,027			507,301
Proceeds from issuance of stock related to stock-based awards		268			1,616			(259	)		639
Proceeds from issuance of stock		86,987			—
Net increase in other borrowings		216,972			1,115,858
Proceeds from issuance of preferred stock								145,078			—
Net decrease in other borrowings								(1,188,846	)		(82,066	)
Excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation arrangements		16,493			6,274			(3,890	)		4,345
Net increase in federal funds purchased		61,081			38,149
Issuance of subordinated notes		111,000			—
Net increase (decrease) in federal funds purchased								179,819			(28,322	)

Net cash provided by financing activities of continuing operations		1,654,123			1,192,959
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities of continuing operations								(563,071	)		401,897

Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents		38,633			(59,297	)		(14,905	)		47,552
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period		110,558			179,866			206,348			101,258

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	149,191			120,569		$	191,443		$	148,810


Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information:
Cash paid during the period for interest	$	14,524		$	15,210		$	5,774		$	4,608
Cash paid during the period for income taxes		56,552			19,516			2,694			8,806
Non-cash transactions:
Transfers from loans/leases to OREO and other repossessed assets		3,410			19,254			—			2,534

Texas Capital Bancshares, Inc. (“the Company”), a Delaware financial holding company, was incorporated in November 1996 and commenced doing business in March 1998, but did not commence banking operations until December 1998. The consolidated financial statements of the Company include the accounts of Texas Capital Bancshares, Inc. and its wholly owned subsidiary, Texas Capital Bank, National Association (“the Bank”). The Bank currently provides commercial banking services to its customers largely in Texas and concentrates on middle market commercial businesses and successful professionals and entrepreneurs.

The accounting and reporting policies of Texas Capital Bancshares, Inc. conform to accounting principles generally accepted in the United States and to generally accepted practices within the banking industry. Our consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Texas Capital Bancshares, Inc. and its subsidiary, the Bank. Certain prior period balances have been reclassified to conform to the current period presentation.

The consolidated interim financial statements have been prepared without audit. Certain information and footnote disclosures presented in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States have been condensed or omitted. In the opinion of management, the interim financial statements include all normal and recurring adjustments and the disclosures made are adequate to make interim financial information not misleading. The consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“GAAP”) for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q adopted by the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). Accordingly, the financial statements do not include all of the information and footnotes required by GAAP for complete financial statements and should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements, and notes thereto, for the year ended December 31, ~~2011,~~2012, included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on February ~~23, 2012~~21, 2013 (the ~~“2011~~“2012 Form 10-K”). Operating results for the interim periods disclosed herein are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for a full year or any future period.

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements. Actual results could differ from those estimates. The allowance for loan losses, the fair value of stock-based compensation awards, the fair values of financial instruments and the status of contingencies are particularly susceptible to significant change in the near term.

Securities are classified as trading, available-for-sale or held-to-maturity. Management classifies securities at the time of purchase and re-assesses such designation at each balance sheet date; however, transfers between categories from this re-assessment are rare.

Securities acquired for resale in anticipation of short-term market movements are classified as trading, with realized and unrealized gains and losses recognized in income. To date, we have not had any activity in our trading account.

Debt securities are classified as held-to-maturity when we have the positive intent and ability to hold the securities to maturity. Held-to-maturity securities are stated at amortized cost. Debt securities not classified as held-to-maturity or trading and marketable equity securities not classified as trading are classified as available-for-sale.

Available-for-sale securities are stated at fair value, with the unrealized gains and losses reported in a separate component of accumulated other comprehensive income, net of tax. The amortized cost of debt securities is adjusted for amortization of premiums and accretion of discounts to maturity, or in the case of mortgage-backed securities, over the estimated life of the security. Such amortization and accretion is included in interest income from securities. Realized gains and losses and declines in value judged to be other-than-temporary are included in gain (loss) on sale of securities. The cost of securities sold is based on the specific identification method.

All securities are available-for-sale as of ~~September 30, 2012~~March 31, 2013 and December 31, ~~2011.~~2012.

Loans held for investment (which include equipment leases accounted for as financing leases) are stated at the amount of unpaid principal reduced by deferred income (net of costs). Interest on loans is recognized using the simple-interest method on the daily balances of the principal amounts outstanding. Loan origination fees, net of direct loan origination costs, and commitment fees, are deferred and amortized as an adjustment to yield over the life of the loan, or over the commitment period, as applicable.

A loan held for investment is considered impaired when, based on current information and events, it is probable that we will be unable to collect all amounts due (both principal and interest) according to the terms of the loan agreement. Reserves on impaired loans are measured based on the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate or the fair value of the underlying collateral. Impaired loans, or portions thereof, are charged off when deemed uncollectible.

The accrual of interest on loans is discontinued when there is a clear indication that the borrower’s cash flow may not be sufficient to meet payments as they become due, which is generally when a loan is 90 days past due. When a loan is placed on non-accrual status, all previously accrued and unpaid interest is reversed. Interest income is subsequently recognized on a cash basis as long as the remaining book balance of the asset is deemed to be collectible. If collectability is questionable, then cash payments are applied to principal. A loan is placed back on accrual status when both principal and interest are current and it is probable that we will be able to collect all amounts due (both principal and interest) according to the terms of the loan agreement.

We purchase ~~participations~~legal ownership interests in mortgage loans ~~primarily~~ for sale in the secondary market through our mortgage warehouse lending division. ~~These~~The ownership interests are ~~participations~~ purchased from ~~non-bank~~unaffiliated mortgage originators who are seeking additional funding through ~~participation~~sale of the undivided ownership interests to facilitate their ability to originate ~~loans in their own name.~~loans. The mortgage originator has no obligation to offer and we have no obligation to purchase these ~~participation~~ interests. The originator closes mortgage loans consistent with underwriting standards established by approved investors, and, ~~once~~at the ~~loan closes,~~time of the sale to the investor, our ownership interest and that of the originator ~~delivers~~are delivered by us to the ~~loan to a third party investor.~~investor selected by the originator and approved by us. We typically purchase up to a 99% ~~participation~~ownership interest with the originator financing the remaining percentage. ~~The loan participations~~These loans are ~~highly liquid and~~ held by us for ~~a short~~an interim period, usually less than 30 days and more typically 10-20 days. Accordingly, ~~these~~because we intend to sell the loans, they are classified as held for sale and are carried at the lower of cost or fair value, determined on an ~~aggregate~~individual loan basis. Because of conditions in agreements with originators designed to reduce transaction risks, under the form-based rules of Accounting Standards Codification 860,Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets (“ASC 860”), the ownership interests do not qualify as participating interests. Under ASC 860, the ownership interests are deemed to be loans to the originator, although we have an actual, legal ownership interest in the underlying residential mortgage loans to individual borrowers.

Due to market conditions or events of default by the ~~terms of~~investor or the ~~agreements, loans~~originator, we could be ~~transferred~~required to purchase the remaining interests in the underlying mortgage loans and transfer them to our loans held for investment portfolio at ~~the lower of cost or market.~~fair value. Mortgage ~~warehouse lending~~ loans transferred to our loans held for investment portfolio could require future allocations of the allowance for loan losses or be subject to charge off in the event the loans become impaired.

We sell participations in our ownership interests to other financial institutions. These qualify as participating interests under ASC 860 and are appropriately netted from our loans held for sale balance on the balance sheet.

The allowance for loan losses is established through a provision for loan losses charged against income. The allowance for loan losses includes specific reserves for impaired loans and a general reserve for estimated losses inherent in the loan portfolio at the balance sheet date, but not yet identified with specific loans. Loans deemed to be uncollectible are charged against the allowance when management believes that the ~~collectability~~collectibility of the principal is unlikely and subsequent recoveries, if any, are credited to the allowance. Management’s periodic evaluation of the adequacy of the allowance is based on an assessment of the current loan portfolio, including known inherent risks, adverse situations that may affect the borrowers’ ability to repay, the estimated value of any underlying collateral and current economic conditions.

Repossessed assets, which are included in other assets on the balance sheet, consist of collateral that has been repossessed. Collateral that has been repossessed is recorded at fair value less selling costs through a charge to the allowance for loan losses, if necessary. Write-downs are provided for subsequent permanent declines in value and are recorded in ~~allowance and~~ other ~~carrying costs expense included in allowance and other carrying costs for OREO in~~ non-interest expense.

Other ~~Real Estate Owned~~real estate owned (“OREO”), which is included in other assets on the balance sheet, consists of real estate that has been foreclosed. Real estate that has been foreclosed is recorded at the fair value of the real estate, less selling costs, through a charge to the allowance for loan losses, if necessary. Subsequent write-downs required for declines in value are recorded through a valuation allowance, or taken directly to the asset, ~~and~~ charged to other non-interest expense.

Premises and equipment are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation. Depreciation is computed using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets, which range from three to ten years. Gains or losses on disposals of premises and equipment are included in results of operations.

Marketing costs are expensed as incurred. Ongoing maintenance and enhancements of websites are expensed as incurred. Costs incurred in connection with development or purchase of internal use software are capitalized and amortized over a period not to exceed five years. Capitalized internal use software costs are included in other assets in the consolidated financial statements.

Intangible assets are acquired assets that lack physical substance but can be distinguished from goodwill because of contractual or other legal rights or because the asset is capable of being sold or exchanged either on its own or in combination with a related contract, asset, or liability. Our intangible assets relate primarily to loan customer relationships. Intangible assets with definite useful lives are amortized on an accelerated basis over their estimated life. Intangible assets are tested for impairment annually or whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying amount of the assets may not be recoverable from future undiscounted cash flows. If impaired, the assets are recorded at fair value.

We have determined that all of our lending divisions and subsidiaries meet the aggregation criteria of ASC 280,Segment Reporting, since all offer similar products and services, operate with similar processes, and have similar customers.

We account for all stock-based compensation transactions in accordance with ASC 718,Compensation – Stock Compensation(“ASC 718”), which requires that stock compensation transactions be recognized as compensation expense in the statement of operations based on their fair values on the measurement date, which is the date of the grant.

Unrealized gains or losses on our available-for-sale securities (after applicable income tax expense or benefit) are included in accumulated other comprehensive income, net. Accumulated comprehensive income, net for the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2013 and 2012 ~~and 2011~~ is reported in the accompanying consolidated statements of changes in stockholders’ equity and consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income.

The Company and its subsidiary file a consolidated federal income tax return. We utilize the liability method in accounting for income taxes. Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based upon the difference between the values of the assets and liabilities as reflected in the financial statements and their related tax basis using enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which the differences are expected to be recovered or settled. As changes in tax law or rates are enacted, deferred tax assets and liabilities are adjusted through the provision for income taxes. A valuation reserve is provided against deferred tax assets unless it is more likely than not that such deferred tax assets will be realized.

Basic earnings per common share is based on net income available to common stockholders divided by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the period excluding non-vested stock. Diluted earnings per common share include the dilutive effect of stock options and non-vested stock awards granted using the treasury stock method. A reconciliation of the weighted-average shares used in calculating basic earnings per common share and the weighted average common shares used in calculating diluted earnings per common share for the reported periods is provided in Note 2 – Earnings Per Common Share.

ASC 820,Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (“ASC 820”), defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value under GAAP and enhances disclosures about fair value measurements. In general, fair values of financial instruments are based upon quoted market prices, where available. If such quoted market prices are not available, fair value is based on estimates using present value or other valuation techniques. Those techniques are significantly affected by the assumptions used, including the discount rate and estimates of future cash flows.

The following table presents the computation of basic and diluted earnings per share (in thousands except per share data):


	Three months ended September 30,						Nine months ended September 30,						Three months ended March 31,
	2012			2011			2012			2011			2013			2012
Numerator:
Net income from continuing operations	$	32,570		$	21,710		$	89,274		$	50,357		$	33,144		$	27,081
Loss from discontinued operations		(34	)		(7	)		(31	)		(121	)
Preferred stock dividends														81			—

Net income from continuing operations available to common shareholders														33,063			27,081
Income (loss) from discontinued operations														(1	)		4

Net income	$	32,536		$	21,703		$	89,243		$	50,236		$	33,062		$	27,085

Denominator:
Denominator for basic earnings per share - weighted average shares		39,618,007			37,411,851			38,513,515			37,262,658			40,473,857			37,795,230
Effect of employee stock-based awards⁽¹⁾		632,790			714,192			677,782			888,027			456,996			699,271
Effect of warrants to purchase common stock		504,936			309,343			459,898			304,199			498,391			419,740

Denominator for dilutive earnings per share - adjusted weighted average shares and assumed conversions		40,755,733			38,435,386			39,651,195			38,454,884			41,429,244			38,914,241


Basic earnings per common share from continuing operations	$	0.82		$	0.58		$	2.32		$	1.35		$	0.82		$	0.72

Basic earnings per common share	$	0.82		$	0.58		$	2.32		$	1.35		$	0.82		$	0.72


Diluted earnings per share from continuing operations	$	0.80		$	0.56		$	2.25		$	1.31		$	0.80		$	0.70

Diluted earnings per common share	$	0.80		$	0.56		$	2.25		$	1.31		$	0.80		$	0.70

Securities are identified as either held-to-maturity or available-for-sale based upon various factors, including asset/liability management strategies, liquidity and profitability objectives, and regulatory requirements. Held-to-maturity securities are carried at cost, adjusted for amortization of premiums or accretion of discounts. Available-for-sale securities are securities that may be sold prior to maturity based upon asset/liability management decisions. Securities identified as available-for-sale are carried at fair value. Unrealized gains or losses on available-for-sale securities are recorded as accumulated other comprehensive income in stockholders’ equity, net of taxes. Amortization of premiums or accretion of discounts on mortgage-backed securities is periodically adjusted for estimated prepayments. Realized gains and losses and declines in value judged to be other-than-temporary are included in gain (loss) on sale of securities. The cost of securities sold is based on the specific identification method.

At ~~September 30, 2012,~~March 31, 2013, our net unrealized gain on the available-for-sale securities portfolio value was ~~$6.0~~$4.3 million ~~which represented 5.89% of the amortized cost. At~~compared to $5.0 million at December 31, ~~2011, the unrealized gain was $7.3 million, or 5.32% of the amortized cost.~~2012. As indicated by the difference in the gain as a percent of the amortized cost, the reduction in the total unrealized gain was due almost entirely to the reduction in the balances of the securities held.


	September 30, 2012								March 31, 2013
	Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized Gains		Gross Unrealized Losses		Estimated Fair Value		Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized Gains		Gross Unrealized Losses		Estimated Fair Value
Available-for-Sale Securities:
Residential mortgage-backed securities	$	63,507	$	4,847	$	—	$	68,354	$	51,584	$	3,779	$	—	$	55,363
Corporate securities		5,000		150		—		5,150		5,000		—		—		5,000
Municipals		25,302		761		—		26,063		19,115		457		—		19,572
Equity securities⁽¹⁾		7,513		208		—		7,721		7,519		73		—		7,592

	$	101,322	$	5,966	$	—	$	107,288	$	83,218	$	4,309	$	—	$	87,527


	December 31, 2011								December 31, 2012
	Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized Gains		Gross Unrealized Losses		Estimated Fair Value		Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized Gains		Gross Unrealized Losses		Estimated Fair Value
Available-for-Sale Securities:
Residential mortgage-backed securities	$	84,363	$	5,720	$	—	$	90,083	$	57,342	$	4,239	$	—	$	61,581
Corporate securities		5,000		225		—		5,225		5,000		80		—		5,080
Municipals		29,577		1,165		—		30,742		25,300		594		—		25,894
Equity securities⁽¹⁾		7,506		154		—		7,660		7,519		121		—		7,640
Other		10,000		—		—		10,000

	$	136,446	$	7,264	$	—	$	143,710	$	95,161	$	5,034	$	—	$	100,195

The amortized cost and estimated fair value of securities are presented below by contractual maturity (in thousands, except percentage data):


	September 30, 2012															March 31, 2013
	Less Than One Year			After One Through Five Years			After Five Through Ten Years			After Ten Years			Total			Less Than One Year			After One Through Five Years			After Five Through Ten Years			After Ten Years			Total
Available-for-sale:
Residential mortgage-backed securities:⁽¹⁾
Amortized cost	$	1,059		$	6,657		$	23,037		$	32,754		$	63,507		$	318		$	5,474		$	24,808		$	20,984		$	51,584
Estimated fair value		1,113			7,164			25,000			35,077			68,354			333			5,830			26,815			22,385			55,363
Weighted average yield⁽³⁾		4.19	%		5.26	%		4.74	%		3.63	%		4.21	%		4.16	%		5.32	%		4.93	%		2.94	%		4.16	%
Corporate securities:
Amortized cost		—			5,000			—			—			5,000			5,000			—			—			—			5,000
Estimated fair value		—			5,150			—			—			5,150			5,000			—			—			—			5,000
Weighted average yield⁽³⁾		—			7.38	%		—			—			7.38	%		7.38	%		0.00	%		—			—			7.38	%
Municipals:⁽²⁾
Amortized cost		5,493			16,872			2,937			—			25,302			8,059			9,854			1,202			—			19,115
Estimated fair value		5,583			17,429			3,051			—			26,063			8,216			10,103			1,253			—			19,572
Weighted average yield⁽³⁾		5.75	%		5.59	%		5.92	%		—			5.66	%		5.58	%		5.66	%		6.08	%		—			5.66	%
Equity securities:
Equity securities:⁽⁴⁾
Amortized cost		7,513			—			—			—			7,513			7,519			—			—			—			7,519
Estimated fair value		7,721			—			—			—			7,721			7,592			—			—			—			7,592

Total available-for-sale securities:
Amortized cost													$	101,322														$	83,218

Estimated fair value													$	107,288														$	87,527


	December 31, 2011
	Less Than One Year			After One Through Five Years			After Five Through Ten Years			After Ten Years			Total
Available-for-sale:
Residential mortgage-backed securities:⁽¹⁾
Amortized cost	$	13		$	10,420		$	31,502		$	42,428		$	84,363
Estimated fair value		13			11,095			33,745			45,230			90,083
Weighted average yield⁽³⁾		6.50	%		4.85	%		4.71	%		3.79	%		4.26	%
Corporate securities:
Amortized cost		—			5,000			—			—			5,000
Estimated fair value		—			5,225			—			—			5,225
Weighted average yield⁽³⁾		—			7.38	%		—			—			7.38	%
Municipals:⁽²⁾
Amortized cost		4,184			18,980			6,413			—			29,577
Estimated fair value		4,213			19,784			6,745			—			30,742
Weighted average yield⁽³⁾		5.36	%		5.51	%		5.86	%		—			5.57	%
Equity securities:
Amortized cost		7,506			—			—			—			7,506
Estimated fair value		7,660			—			—			—			7,660
Other:⁽³⁾
Amortized cost		10,000			—			—			—			10,000
Estimated fair value		10,000			—			—			—			10,000
Weighted average yield⁽³⁾		0.10	%		—			—			—			0.10	%
Total available-for-sale securities:

Amortized cost													$	136,446

Estimated fair value													$	143,710



	December 31, 2012
	Less Than One Year			After One Through Five Years			After Five Through Ten Years			After Ten Years			Total
Available-for-sale:
Residential mortgage-backed securities:⁽¹⁾
Amortized cost	$	656		$	5,698		$	23,111		$	27,877		$	57,342
Estimated fair value		690			6,113			24,948			29,830			61,581
Weighted average yield⁽³⁾		4.20	%		5.29	%		4.86	%		3.41	%		4.19	%
Corporate securities:
Amortized cost		5,000			—			—			—			5,000
Estimated fair value		5,080			—			—			—			5,080
Weighted average yield⁽³⁾		7.38	%		—			—			—			7.38	%
Municipals:⁽²⁾
Amortized cost		6,575			16,448			2,277			—			25,300
Estimated fair value		6,646			16,895			2,353			—			25,894
Weighted average yield⁽³⁾		5.75	%		5.66	%		6.01	%		—			5.72	%
Equity securities:⁽⁴⁾
Amortized cost		7,519			—			—			—			7,519
Estimated fair value		7,640			—			—			—			7,640
Total available-for-sale securities:

Amortized cost													$	95,161	��

Estimated fair value													$	100,195

Securities with carrying values of approximately ~~$48.6~~$72.9 million were pledged to secure certain borrowings and deposits at ~~September 30, 2012.~~March 31, 2013. Of the pledged securities at ~~September 30, 2012,~~March 31, 2013, approximately ~~$22.1~~$33.4 million were pledged for certain deposits, and approximately ~~$26.5~~$39.5 million were pledged for repurchase agreements.

At ~~September 30, 2012~~March 31, 2013 and December 31, ~~2011,~~2012, we did not have any investment securities in an unrealized loss position.

At ~~September 30, 2012~~March 31, 2013 and December 31, ~~2011,~~2012, loans were as follows (in thousands):


	September 30, 2012			December 31, 2011			March 31, 2013			December 31, 2012
Commercial	$	4,038,955		$	3,275,150		$	4,155,683		$	4,106,419
Construction		649,375			422,026			760,964			737,637
Real estate		1,804,434			1,819,251			1,959,808			1,892,451
Consumer		19,975			24,822			17,464			19,493
Leases		74,207			61,792			66,603			69,470

Gross loans held for investment		6,586,946			5,603,041			6,960,522			6,825,470
Deferred income (net of direct origination costs)		(37,857	)		(30,670	)		(40,511	)		(39,935	)
Allowance for loan losses		(73,722	)		(70,295	)		(75,000	)		(74,337	)

Total loans held for investment, net		6,475,367			5,502,076			6,845,011			6,711,198
Loans held for sale		2,818,622			2,080,081			2,577,830			3,175,272

Total	$	9,293,989		$	7,582,157		$	9,422,841		$	9,886,470

Commercial Loans and Leases. Our commercial loan and lease portfolio is comprised of lines of credit for working capital and term loans and leases to finance equipment and other business assets. Our energy production loans are generally collateralized with proven reserves based on appropriate valuation standards. Our commercial loans and leases are underwritten after carefully evaluating and understanding the borrower’s ability to operate profitably. Our underwriting standards are designed to promote relationship banking rather than making loans on a transaction basis. Our lines of credit typically are limited to a percentage of the value of the assets securing the line. Lines of credit and term loans typically are reviewed annually and are supported by accounts receivable, inventory, equipment and other assets of our clients’ businesses.

Real Estate Loans. A portion of our real estate loan portfolio is comprised of loans secured by properties other than market risk or investment-type real estate. Market risk loans are real estate loans where the primary source of repayment is expected to come from the sale or lease of the real property collateral. We generally provide temporary financing for commercial and residential property. These loans are viewed primarily as cash flow loans and secondarily as loans secured by real estate. Our real estate loans generally have maximum terms of five to seven years, and we provide loans with both floating and fixed rates. We generally avoid long-term loans for commercial real estate held for investment. Real estate loans may be more adversely affected by conditions in the real estate markets or in the general economy. Appraised values may be highly variable due to market conditions and the impact of the inability of potential purchasers and lessees to obtain financing and lack of transactions at comparable values.

Construction Loans. Our construction loan portfolio consists primarily of single- and multi-family residential properties and commercial projects used in manufacturing, warehousing, service or retail businesses. Our construction loans generally have terms of one to three years. We typically make construction loans to developers, builders and contractors that have an established record of successful project completion and loan repayment and have a substantial investment in the borrowers’ equity. However, construction loans are generally based upon estimates of costs and value associated with the completed project. Sources of repayment for these types of loans may be pre-committed permanent loans from other lenders, sales of developed property, or an interim loan commitment from us until permanent financing is obtained. The nature of these loans makes ultimate repayment extremely sensitive to overall economic conditions. Borrowers may not be able to correct conditions of default in loans, increasing risk of exposure to classification, non-performing status, reserve allocation and actual credit loss and foreclosure. These loans typically have floating rates and commitment fees.

Loans Held for Sale. Our loans held for sale consist of ~~participations~~ownership interests purchased in single-family residential mortgages funded through our warehouse lending group. These loans are ~~highly liquid and held by us~~typically on our balance sheet for ~~a short period, usually less than 30 days and more typically~~ 10 to 20 ~~days.~~days or less. We have agreements with mortgage lenders and ~~participate~~purchase legal interests in individual loans they originate. All loans are underwritten consistent with established programs for permanent financing with financially sound investors. Substantially all loans are conforming loans. Loans held for sale as of March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012 are net of $351.9 million and $436.0 of participations sold, respectively.

As of ~~September 30, 2012,~~March 31, 2013, a substantial majority of the principal amount of the loans held for investment in our portfolio was to businesses and individuals in Texas. This geographic concentration subjects the loan portfolio to the general economic conditions within this area. The risks created by this concentration have been considered by management in the determination of the ~~adequacy~~appropriateness of the allowance for loan losses. Management believes the allowance for loan losses is appropriate to cover estimated losses on loans at each balance sheet date.

At ~~September 30, 2012,~~March 31, 2013, we had a blanket floating lien based on certain real estate loans used as collateral for FHLB borrowings.

The reserve for loan losses is comprised of specific reserves for impaired loans and ~~a general reserve for estimated~~an estimate of losses inherent in the portfolio at the balance sheet date, but not yet identified with specified loans. We regularly evaluate our reserve for loan losses to maintain an appropriate level to absorb estimated loan losses inherent in the loan portfolio. Factors contributing to the determination of reserves include the credit worthiness of the borrower, changes in the value of pledged collateral, and general economic conditions. All loan commitments rated substandard or worse and greater than $500,000 are specifically reviewed for loss potential. For loans deemed to be impaired, a specific allocation is assigned based on the losses expected to be realized from those loans. For purposes of determining the general reserve, the portfolio is segregated by product types to recognize differing risk profiles among categories, and then further segregated by credit grades. Credit grades are assigned to all loans. Each credit grade is assigned a risk factor, or reserve allocation percentage. These risk

factors are multiplied by the outstanding principal balance and risk-weighted by product type to calculate the required reserve. A similar process is employed to calculate a reserve assigned to off-balance sheet commitments, specifically unfunded loan commitments and letters of credit, and any needed reserve is recorded in other liabilities. Even though portions of the allowance may be allocated to specific loans, the entire allowance is available for any credit that, in management’s judgment, should be charged off.

We have several pass credit grades that are assigned to loans based on varying levels of risk, ranging from credits that are secured by cash or marketable securities, to watch credits which have all the characteristics of an acceptable credit risk but warrant more than the normal level of monitoring. Within our criticized/classified credit grades are special mention, substandard, and doubtful. Special mention loans are those that are currently protected by sound worth and paying capacity of the borrower, but that are potentially weak and constitute an additional credit risk. The loan has the potential to deteriorate to a substandard grade due to the existence of financial or administrative deficiencies. Substandard loans have a well-defined weakness or weaknesses that jeopardize the liquidation of the debt. They are characterized by the distinct possibility that we will sustain some loss if the deficiencies are not corrected. Some substandard loans are inappropriately protected by sound worth and paying capacity of the borrower and of the collateral pledged and may be considered impaired. Substandard loans can be accruing or can be on nonaccrual depending on the circumstances of the individual loans. Loans classified as doubtful have all the weaknesses inherent in substandard loans with the added characteristics that the weaknesses make collection or liquidation in full highly questionable and improbable. The possibility of loss is extremely high. All doubtful loans are on nonaccrual.

The reserve allocation percentages assigned to each credit grade have been developed based primarily on an analysis of our historical loss rates. The allocations are adjusted for certain qualitative factors for such things as general economic conditions, changes in credit policies and lending standards. Historical loss rates are adjusted to account for current environmental conditions which we believe are likely to cause loss rates to be higher or lower than past experience. Each quarter we produce an adjustment range for environmental factors unique to us and our market. Changes in the trend and severity of problem loans can cause the estimation of losses to differ from past experience. In addition, the reserve considers the results of reviews performed by independent third party reviewers as reflected in their confirmations of assigned credit grades within the portfolio. The portion of the allowance that is not derived by the allowance allocation percentages compensates for the uncertainty and complexity in estimating loan and lease losses including factors and conditions that may not be

fully reflected in the determination and application of the allowance allocation percentages. We evaluate many factors and conditions in determining the unallocated portion of the allowance, including the economic and business conditions affecting key lending areas, credit quality trends and general growth in the portfolio. The allowance is considered appropriate, given management’s assessment of potential losses within the portfolio as of the evaluation date, the significant growth in the loan and lease portfolio, current economic conditions in the Company’s market areas and other factors.

The methodology used in the periodic review of reserve adequacy, which is performed at least quarterly, is designed to be dynamic and responsive to changes in portfolio credit quality. The changes are reflected in the general reserve and in specific reserves as the collectability of larger classified loans is evaluated with new information. As our portfolio has matured, historical loss ratios have been closely monitored, and our reserve adequacy relies primarily on our loss history. Currently, the review of reserve adequacy is performed by executive management and presented to our board of directors for their review, consideration and ratification on a quarterly basis.

The following tables summarize the credit risk profile of our loan portfolio by internally assigned grades and nonaccrual status as of ~~September 30, 2012~~March 31, 2013 and December 31, ~~2011~~2012 (in thousands):


March 31, 2013
	Commercial		Construction		Real Estate		Consumer		Leases		Total
Grade:
Pass	$	4,068,700	$	750,496	$	1,861,378	$	17,427	$	65,661	$	6,763,662
Special mention		18,366		5,783		20,973		—		766		45,888
Substandard-accruing		47,803		4,685		54,953		—		107		107,548
Non-accrual		20,814		—		22,504		37		69		43,424

Total loans held for investment	$	4,155,683	$	760,964	$	1,959,808	$	17,464	$	66,603	$	6,960,522


December 31, 2012
	Commercial		Construction		Real Estate		Consumer		Leases		Total
Grade:
Pass	$	4,013,538	$	703,673	$	1,816,027	$	19,436	$	68,327	$	6,621,001
Special mention		33,137		11,957		12,461		—		919		58,474
Substandard-accruing		44,371		4,790		40,897		—		104		90,162
Non-accrual		15,373		17,217		23,066		57		120		55,833

Total loans held for investment	$	4,106,419	$	737,637	$	1,892,451	$	19,493	$	69,470	$	6,825,470

The following table details activity in the reserve for loan losses by portfolio segment for the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September 30, 2012~~March 31, 2013 and ~~September 30, 2011.~~March 31, 2012. Allocation of a portion of the reserve to one category of loans does not preclude its availability to absorb losses in other categories.


September 30, 2012
March 31, 2013
(in thousands)	Commercial		Construction			Real Estate			Consumer		Leases		Unallocated		Total		Commercial		Construction			Real Estate		Consumer			Leases			Unallocated			Total
Beginning balance	$	17,337	$	7,845		$	33,721		$	223	$	2,356	$	8,813	$	70,295	$	21,547	$	12,097		$	30,893	$	226		$	2,460		$	7,114		$	74,337
Provision for loan losses		4,575		3,258			(2,840	)		6		417		602		6,018		3,567		(3,614	)		4,183		(24	)		(474	)		(1,759	)		1,879
Charge-offs		2,664		—			899			49		170		—		3,782		1,648		—			105		19			—			—			1,772
Recoveries		482		10			586			26		87		—		1,191		397		—			8		30			121			—			556

Net charge-offs (recoveries)		2,182		(10	)		313			23		83		—		2,591		1,251		—			97		(11	)		(121	)		—			1,216

Ending balance	$	19,730	$	11,113		$	30,568		$	206	$	2,690	$	9,415	$	73,722	$	23,863	$	8,483		$	34,979	$	213		$	2,107		$	5,355		$	75,000

Period end amount allocated to:
Loans individually evaluated for impairment	$	5,149	$	—		$	775		$	18	$	42	$	—	$	5,984	$	5,069	$	—		$	812	$	15		$	10		$	—		$	5,906
Loans collectively evaluated for impairment		—		—			—			—		—		—		—		—		—			—		—			—			—			—

Ending balance	$	5,149	$	—		$	775		$	18	$	42	$	—	$	5,984	$	5,069	$	—		$	812	$	15		$	10		$	—		$	5,906


September 30, 2011
March 31, 2012
(in thousands)	Commercial		Construction			Real Estate			Consumer		Leases		Unallocated		Total		Commercial		Construction			Real Estate		Consumer			Leases			Unallocated			Total
Beginning balance	$	15,918	$	7,336		$	38,049		$	306	$	5,405	$	4,496	$	71,510	$	17,337	$	7,845		$	33,721	$	223		$	2,356		$	8,813		$	70,295
Provision for loan losses		11,289		3,024			(7,379	)		3,616		7,135		4,438		22,123		727		1,074			710		67			(29	)		(24	)		2,525
Charge-offs		7,170		—			18,837			317		980		—		27,304		462		—			559		—			95			—			1,116
Recoveries		798		248			305			5		212		—		1,568		159		—			108		5			16			—			288

Net charge-offs		6,372		(248	)		18,532			312		768		—		25,736		303		—			451		(5	)		79			—			828

Ending balance	$	20,835	$	10,608		$	12,138		$	3,610	$	11,772	$	8,934	$	67,897	$	17,761	$	8,919		$	33,980	$	295		$	2,248		$	8,789		$	71,992

Period end amount allocated to:
Loans individually evaluated for impairment	$	3,064	$	312		$	2,568		$	52	$	353	$	—	$	6,349	$	2,827	$	300		$	1,298	$	55		$	61		$	—		$	4,541
Loans collectively evaluated for impairment		—		—			—			—		—		—		—		—		—			—		—			—			—			—

Ending balance	$	3,064	$	312		$	2,568		$	52	$	353	$	—	$	6,349	$	2,827	$	300		$	1,298	$	55		$	61		$	—		$	4,541

We have traditionally maintained an unallocated reserve component to allow for uncertainty in economic and other conditions affecting the quality of the loan portfolio. The unallocated portion of our loan loss reserve has ~~increased~~decreased since ~~September 30, 2011.~~March 31, 2012. We believe the level of unallocated reserves at ~~September 30, 2012~~March 31, 2013 is warranted due to the ongoing weak economic environment which has produced more frequent losses, including those resulting from fraud by borrowers, that do not correlate to historical loss rates for specific product types or credit risk grades. Our methodology used to calculate the allowance considers historical losses, however, the historical loss rates for specific product types or credit risk grades may not fully incorporate the effects of continued weakness in the economy. In addition, a substantial portion of losses realized over the past several years were related to commercial real estate loans. Continuing uncertainty and illiquidity in the commercial real estate market has produced and continues to cause material changes in appraised values that can influence our impairment calculations on currently impaired loans and on pass-rated loans that may experience weakness if economic conditions and valuations do not stabilize.

Generally we place loans on non-accrual when there is a clear indication that the borrower’s cash flow may not be sufficient to meet payments as they become due, which is generally when a loan is 90 days past due. When a loan is placed on non-accrual status, all previously accrued and unpaid interest is reversed. Interest income is subsequently recognized on a cash basis as long as the remaining unpaid principal amount of the loan is deemed to be fully collectible. If collectability is questionable, then cash payments are applied to principal. The table below summarizes our non-accrual loans by type and purpose as of ~~September 30, 2012~~March 31, 2013 (in thousands):


			March 31,		December 31,
			2013		2012
Commercial
Business loans	$	17,653	$	17,316	$	15,373
Energy loans				3,498		—
Construction
Market risk		19,249		—		17,217
Real estate
Market risk		10,236		9,679		11,054
Commercial		6,374		9,605		8,617
Secured by 1-4 family		3,490		3,220		3,395
Consumer		60		37		57
Leases		213		69		120

Total non-accrual loans	$	57,275	$	43,424	$	55,833

As of ~~September 30, 2012,~~March 31, 2013, non-accrual loans included in the table above included ~~$14.7~~$16.9 million related to loans that met the criteria for restructured.

A loan held for investment is considered impaired when, based on current information and events, it is probable that we will be unable to collect all amounts due (both principal and interest) according to the terms of the loan agreement. In accordance withFASB ASC 310 Receivables, we have also included all restructured loans in our impaired loan totals. The following tables detail our impaired loans, by portfolio class as of ~~September 30, 2012~~March 31, 2013 and December 31, ~~2011~~2012 (in thousands):


September 30, 2012
March 31, 2013
	Recorded Investment		Unpaid Principal Balance		Related Allowance		Average Recorded Investment		Interest Income Recognized		Recorded Investment			Unpaid Principal Balance		Related Allowance		Average Recorded Investment		Interest Income Recognized
With no related allowance recorded:
Commercial
Business loans	$	644	$	644	$	—	$	649	$	—	$	2,569		$	2,569	$	—	$	2,815	$	—
Energy												—			—		—		—		—
Construction
Market risk		19,248		19,248		—		19,722		510		729			729		—		11,721		114
Real estate
Market risk		7,385		7,385		—		5,079		—		8,744			8,744		—		8,955		—
Commercial		6,374		6,374		—		6,375		—		9,039			9,039		—		7,416		—
Secured by 1-4 family		1,424		1,424		—		1,436		—		2,591			2,591		—		2,619		—
Consumer		—		—		—		—		—		—			—		—		—		—
Leases		—		—		—		—		—		—			—		—		—		—

Total impaired loans with no allowance recorded	$	35,075	$	35,075	$	—	$	33,261	$	510	$	23,672		$	23,672	$	—	$	33,526	$	114

With an allowance recorded:
Commercial
Business loans	$	17,009	$	21,966	$	5,149	$	18,068	$	—	$	17,286		$	20,186	$	4,069	$	14,052	$	—
Energy												3,498			3,498		1,000		1,166		—
Construction
Market risk												—			—		—		641		—
Real estate
Market risk		11,997		11,997		563		14,883		—		9,422			9,422		472		10,767		—
Commercial		—		—		—		25		—		566	��		566		88		1,531		—
Secured by 1-4 family		2,066		2,066		212		2,382		—		629			629		252		718		—
Consumer		60		110		18		199		—		37			37		15		50		—
Leases		213		213		42		239		—		69			69		10		103		—

Total impaired loans with an allowance recorded	$	31,345	$	36,352	$	5,984	$	35,796	$	—	$	31,507		$	34,407	$	5,906	$	29,028	$	—

Combined:
Commercial
Business loans	$	17,653	$	22,610	$	5,149	$	18,717	$	—	$	19,855		$	22,755	$	4,069	$	16,867	$	—
Energy												3,498			3,498		1,000		1,166		—
Construction
Market risk		19,248		19,248		—		19,722		510		729			729		—		12,362		114
Real estate
Market risk		19,382		19,382		563		19,962		—		18,166			18,166		472		19,722		—
Commercial		6,374		6,374		—		6,400		—		9,605			9,605		88		8,947		—
Secured by 1-4 family		3,490		3,490		212		3,818		—		3,220			3,220		252		3,337		—
Consumer		60		110		18		199		—		37			37		15		50		—
Leases		213		213		42		239		—		69			69		10		103		—

Total impaired loans	$	66,420	$	71,427	$	5,984	$	69,057	$	510	$	55,179		$	58,079	$	5,906	$	62,554	$	114


December 31, 2011
December 31, 2012
	Recorded Investment		Unpaid Principal Balance		Related Allowance		Average Recorded Investment		Interest Income Recognized		Recorded Investment		Unpaid Principal Balance		Related Allowance		Average Recorded Investment		Interest Income Recognized
With no related allowance recorded:
Commercial
Business loans	$	1,716	$	10,378	$	—	$	1,697	$	—	$	2,938	$	2,938	$	—	$	1,409	$	—
Construction
Market risk		19,236		19,236		—		19,315		291		17,217		17,217		—		18,571		677
Real estate
Market risk		5,711		11,217		—		7,064		—		9,061		9,061		—		7,944		—
Commercial		4,575		4,575		—		5,111		—		6,604		6,604		—		6,451		—
Secured by 1-4 family		—		—		—		899		—		2,632		2,632		—		1,827		—
Consumer		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—
Leases		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—

Total impaired loans with no allowance recorded	$	31,238	$	45,406	$	—	$	34,086	$	291	$	38,452	$	38,452	$	—	$	36,202	$	677

With an allowance recorded:
Commercial
Business loans	$	11,197	$	11,197	$	3,124	$	11,056	$	—	$	12,435	$	18,391	$	2,983	$	15,484	$	—
Construction
Market risk		1,883		1,882		298		1,916		—		962		962		14		321		—
Real estate
Market risk		30,533		34,275		1,131		19,146		—		11,439		11,439		535		11,811		—
Commercial		1,809		1,809		271		730		—		2,013		2,013		89		671		—
Secured by 1-4 family		2,279		2,279		330		1,465		—		763		763		275		1,632		—
Consumer		313		313		52		310		—		57		57		16		59		—
Leases		432		432		65		2,328		—		120		120		18		182		—

Total impaired loans with an allowance recorded	$	48,446	$	52,187	$	5,271	$	36,951	$	—	$	27,789	$	33,745	$	3,930	$	30,160	$	—

Combined:
Commercial
Business loans	$	12,913	$	21,575	$	3,124	$	12,753	$	—	$	15,373	$	21,329	$	2,983	$	16,893	$	—
Construction
Market risk		21,119		21,118		298		21,231		291		18,179		18,179		14		18,892		677
Real estate
Market risk		36,244		45,492		1,131		26,210		—		20,500		20,500		535		19,755		—
Commercial		6,384		6,384		271		5,841		—		8,617		8,617		89		7,122		—
Secured by 1-4 family		2,279		2,279		330		2,364		—		3,395		3,395		275		3,459		—
Consumer		313		313		52		310		—		57		57		16		59		—
Leases		432		432		65		2,328		—		120		120		18		182		—

Total impaired loans	$	79,684	$	97,593	$	5,271	$	71,037	$	291	$	66,241	$	72,197	$	3,930	$	66,362	$	677

Average impaired loans outstanding during the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2013 and 2012 ~~and 2011~~ totaled ~~$69.1~~$62.6 million and ~~$74.2~~$74.0 million, respectively.

The table below provides an age analysis of our past due loans that are still accruing as of ~~September 30, 2012~~March 31, 2013 (in thousands):


	30-59 Days Past Due		60-89 Days Past Due		Greater Than 90 Days and Accruing⁽¹⁾		Total Past Due		Current		Total		30-59 Days Past Due		60-89 Days Past Due		Greater Than 90 Days and Accruing⁽¹⁾		Total Past Due		Current		Total
Commercial
Business loans	$	16,654	$	2,261	$	2,864	$	21,779	$	3,001,668	$	3,023,447	$	15,666	$	10,647	$	4,400	$	30,713	$	3,247,226	$	3,277,939
Energy		—		—		—		—		997,855		997,855		3,334		1,880		—		5,214		851,716		856,930
Construction
Market risk		—		—		—		—		626,223		626,223		2,309		—		—		2,309		752,295		754,604
Secured by 1-4 family		1,300		—		—		1,300		2,603		3,903		—		—		—		—		6,360		6,360
Real estate
Market risk		22,957		4,960		758		28,675		1,396,666		1,425,341		12,113		15,171		7,942		35,226		1,489,043		1,524,269
Commercial		—		—		—		—		284,281		284,281		2,970		—		—		2,970		323,381		326,351
Secured by 1-4 family		—		925		—		925		73,787		74,712		243		276		176		695		85,989		86,684
Consumer		105		—		—		105		19,810		19,915		—		12		75		87		17,340		17,427
Leases		481		—		—		481		73,513		73,994		281		—		21		302		66,232		66,534

Total loans held for investment	$	41,497	$	8,146	$	3,622	$	53,265	$	6,476,406	$	6,529,671	$	36,916	$	27,986	$	12,614	$	77,516	$	6,839,582	$	6,917,098

Restructured loans are loans on which, due to the borrower’s financial difficulties, we have granted a concession that we would not otherwise consider for borrowers orof similar credit quality. This may include a transfer of real estate or other assets from the borrower, a modification of loan terms, or a combination of the two. Modifications of terms that could potentially qualify as a restructuring include reduction of contractual interest rate, extension of the maturity date at a contractual interest rate lower than the current rate for new debt with similar risk, or a reduction of the face amount of debt, or forgiveness of either principal or accrued interest. As of ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, we have ~~$9.1~~$11.8 million and $10.4 million, respectively, in loans considered restructured that are not on nonaccrual. ~~These~~As of March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, these loans have ~~$1.1~~$1.0 million and $599,000, respectively, in unfunded commitments. Of the nonaccrual loans at ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2013, $16.9 million met the criteria for restructured. These loans have no unfunded commitments. Of the nonaccrual loans at December 31, 2012, ~~$14.7~~$19.6 million met the criteria for restructured. These loans have no unfunded commitments. A loan continues to qualify as restructured until a consistent payment history or change in borrower’s financial condition has been evidenced, generally no less than twelve months. Assuming that the restructuring agreement specifies an interest rate at the time of the restructuring that is greater than or equal to the rate that we are willing to accept for a new extension of credit with comparable risk, then the loan no longer has to be considered a restructuring if it is in compliance with modified terms in calendar years after the year of the restructure.

The following tables summarize, for the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2013 and 2012, ~~and 2011,~~ loans that have been restructured during ~~2012~~2013 and ~~2011,~~2012, respectively, (in thousands):

The restructured loans generally include terms to reduce the interest rate and extend payment terms. We have not forgiven any principal on the above loans. ~~At September 30, 2012, $1.7 million of the above loans restructured in 2012 are on non-accrual.~~ The restructuring of the loans did not have a significant impact on our allowance for loan losses at ~~September 30, 2012.~~March 31, 2013.

The following tables provide information on how loans were modified as a TDR during the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2013 and 2012 ~~and 2011~~ (in thousands):


	September 30,				March 31,
	2012		2011		2013		2012
Extended maturity	$	1,939	$	10,725	$	—	$	1,742
Adjusted payment schedule		1,424		26,144
Combination of maturity extension and payment schedule adjustment		—		4,011		1,945		—
Other		—		1,937

Total	$	3,363	$	42,817	$	1,945	$	1,742

The following table summarizes, as of ~~September 30, 2012,~~March 31, 2013, loans that were restructured within the last 12 months that have subsequently defaulted (in thousands):


					Number of		Recorded
	Number of Contracts		Recorded Investment		Contracts		Investment
Commercial - secured by real estate		1	$	875		1	$	814
Real estate - market risk		1		2,453		1		2,453

The loans above were subsequently foreclosed and are included in the ~~September 30, 2012~~March 31, 2013 OREO balance.

The table below presents a summary of the activity related to OREO (in thousands):


	Three months ended September 30,						Nine months ended September 30,						Three months ended March 31,
	2012			2011			2012			2011			2013			2012
Beginning balance	$	27,882		$	27,285		$	34,077		$	42,261		$	15,991		$	34,077
Additions		—			12,661			3,397			19,254			—			2,522
Sales		(8,739	)		(2,488	)		(12,467	)		(20,012	)		(1,494	)		(1,257	)
Valuation allowance for OREO		—			(1,601	)		(3,556	)		(3,522	)		—			(856	)
Direct write-downs		(64	)		(61	)		(2,372	)		(2,185	)		(71	)		(1,885	)

Ending balance	$	19,079		$	35,796		$	19,079		$	35,796		$	14,426		$	32,601

The Bank is a party to financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk in the normal course of business to meet the financing needs of its customers. These financial instruments include commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit which involve varying degrees of credit risk in excess of the amount recognized in the consolidated balance sheets. The Bank’s exposure to credit loss in the event of non-performance by the other party to the financial instrument for commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit is represented by the contractual amount of these instruments. The Bank uses the same credit policies in making commitments and conditional obligations as it does for on-balance sheet instruments. The amount of collateral obtained, if deemed necessary, is based on management’s credit evaluation of the borrower.

Commitments to extend credit are agreements to lend to a customer as long as there is no violation of any condition established in the contract. Commitments generally have fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses and may require payment of a fee. Since many of the commitments may expire without being drawn upon, the total commitment amounts do not necessarily represent future cash requirements. The Bank evaluates each customer’s credit-worthiness on a case-by-case basis.

Standby letters of credit are conditional commitments issued by the Bank to guarantee the performance of a customer to a third party. Those guarantees are primarily issued to support public and private borrowing arrangements. The credit risk involved in issuing letters of credit is essentially the same as that involved in extending loan facilities to customers.

The table below summarizes our financial instruments whose contract amounts represent credit risk at ~~September 30, 2012~~March 31, 2013 (in thousands):


Commitments to extend credit	$	2,263,389	$	2,884,324
Standby letters of credit		74,461		89,039

The Company and the Bank are subject to various regulatory capital requirements administered by the federal banking agencies. Failure to meet minimum capital requirements can initiate certain mandatory (and possibly additional discretionary) actions by regulators that, if undertaken, could have a direct material effect on the Company’s and the Bank’s financial statements. Under capital adequacy guidelines and the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action, the Company and the Bank must meet specific capital guidelines that involve quantitative measures of the Company’s and the Bank’s assets, liabilities, and certain off-balance sheet items as calculated under regulatory accounting practices. The Company’s and the Bank’s capital amounts and classification are also subject to qualitative judgments by the regulators about components, risk weightings and other factors.

Quantitative measures established by regulation to ensure capital adequacy require the Company and the Bank to maintain minimum amounts and ratios (set forth in the table below) of total and Tier I capital (as defined in the regulations) to risk-weighted assets (as defined), and of Tier I capital (as defined) to average assets (as defined). Management believes, as of ~~September 30, 2012,~~March 31, 2013, that the Company and the Bank meet all capital adequacy requirements to which they are subject.

Financial institutions are categorized as well capitalized or adequately capitalized, based on minimum total risk-based, Tier I risk-based and Tier I leverage ratios as set forth in the tables below. As shown in the table below, the Company’s capital ratios exceed the regulatory definition of ~~well~~adequately capitalized as of ~~September 30, 2012~~March 31, 2013 and 2011. As of June 30, 2012, the most recent notification from the OCC categorized the Bank as well capitalized under the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action. There have been no conditions or events since the notification that management believes have changed the Bank’s category.2012. Based upon the information in its most recently filed call report for March 31, 2013, the Bank ~~continues to meet~~meets the capital ratios necessary to be well ~~capitalized under~~capitalized.

We believe we have at all times applied the appropriate risk weights (i.e., a 50%, or 20% for FHA/VA, risk weighting) to the ownership interests in mortgage loans owned by us. However, there can be no assurances that we will not ultimately be required to change the applicable risk weight on these assets, either retroactively or prospectively. Changes in risk weights applicable to these assets held by the Bank could cause our Bank to report historical deficiencies relative to well-capitalized or minimum capital standards and cause us to raise additional capital or reduce asset balances to maintain minimum and well-capitalized levels of regulatory ~~framework for prompt corrective action~~capital that could adversely affect future operating results. We will determine if our business practices could be

changed to maintain the risk weights historically applied, if necessary, and ~~continues~~if those changes would be consistent with operating and financial risks acceptable to ~~meet~~the Bank. The Company’s ownership in mortgage loans, in the capital ratios ~~necessary~~ to be included in regulatory filings and reflected below beginning with the first quarter of 2013, utilize 100% risk weighting consistent with our understanding of the OCC’s current interpretation of the supplemental call reports instructions issued in early April that require reporting of such assets as loans to nondepository financial institutions.

During the first quarter of 2013, we downstreamed an additional $125 million to the Bank and applied a 100% risk weight to the loans held for sale portfolio. With the 100% risk weighting for March 31, 2013 the Bank remains well capitalized ~~under~~and we have $157 million in the ~~regulatory framework~~parent company and $50 million in an available line of credit to support the Bank’s future capital needs. As is typical in the mortgage business, month-end and quarter-end balances are generally much higher than average balances. The difference between the quarter-end balance and the average balance for ~~prompt corrective action.~~the first quarter required approximately $22 million in additional capital using the 100% risk weight applied.


	September 30,						March 31,
	2012			2011			2013			2012
Risk-based capital:
Tier 1 capital		10.35	%		9.67	%		10.20	%		9.46	%
Total capital		12.55	%		10.68	%		11.96	%		10.43	%
Leverage		9.63	%		9.77	%		11.33	%		8.95	%

On August 1, 2012 we completed a sale of 2.3 million shares of our common stock in a public offering. Net proceeds from the sale totaled $87.0 million. The additional equity ~~is being~~was used for general corporate purposes, including retirement of $15.0 million of debt and additional capital to support continued loan growth at our bank.

On September 21, 2012, we issued $111.0 million of subordinated notes. The notes mature in September 2042 and bear interest at a rate of 6.50% per annum, payable quarterly. The proceeds ~~may be~~were used for general corporate purposes including funding regulatory capital infusions into the Bank. The ~~loan agreement~~indenture contains customary financial covenants and restrictions.

On March 28, 2013, we completed a sale of 6.0 million shares of 6.5% non-cumulative preferred stock in a public offering. Net proceeds from the sale totaled $145.1 million. The additional equity is being used for general corporate purposes, which may include funding regulatory capital infusions into the Bank.

The fair value of our stock option and stock appreciation right (“SAR”) grants are estimated at the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. The Black-Scholes option valuation model was developed for use in estimating the fair value of traded options which have no vesting restrictions and are fully transferable. In addition, option valuation models require the input of highly subjective assumptions including the expected stock price volatility. Because our employee stock options have characteristics significantly different from those of traded options, and because changes in the subjective input assumptions can materially affect the fair value estimate, in management’s opinion, the existing models do not necessarily provide the best single measure of the fair value of its employee stock options.

Stock-based compensation consists of SARs and RSUs that were granted from 2006 through 2010.


	Three months ended September 30,				Nine months ended September 30,				Three months ended March 31,
(in thousands)	2012		2011		2012		2011		2013		2012
Stock- based compensation expense recognized:
SARs	$	179	$	303		554		1,028	$	148	$	187
RSUs		916		1,312		4,094		4,774		757		1,765

Total compensation expense recognized	$	1,095	$	1,615	$	4,648	$	5,802	$	905	$	1,952


	September 30, 2012				March 31, 2013
(in thousands)	Options		SARs and RSUs		Options		SARs and RSUs
Unrecognized compensation expense related to unvested awards	$	—	$	9,577	$	—	$	9,257
Weighted average period over which expense is expected to be recognized, in years		—		3.24		N/A		3.25

In connection with the 2010 Long-term Incentive Plan, the Company has issued cash-based performance units. A summary of the compensation cost for these units is as follows (in thousands):

Subsequent to the end of the first quarter of 2007, we and the purchaser of our residential mortgage loan division (“RML”) agreed to terminate and settle the contractual arrangements related to the sale of the division, which had been completed as of the end of the third quarter of 2006. Historical operating results of RML are reflected as discontinued operations in the financial statements.

During the three months ended ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2013 and 2012, ~~and 2011,~~ the loss and income from discontinued operations was ~~$34,000~~$1,000 and ~~$7,000, net of taxes, respectively. During the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, the loss from discontinued operations was $31,000 and $121,000,~~$4,000, net of taxes, respectively. The ~~2012 and 2011 losses are~~2013 loss is primarily related to continuing legal and salary expenses incurred in dealing with the remaining loans and requests from investors related to the repurchase of previously sold loans. We still have approximately ~~$304,000~~$301,000 in loans held for sale from discontinued operations that are carried at the estimated market value at quarter-end, which is less than the original cost. We plan to sell these loans, but timing and price to be realized cannot be determined at this time due to market conditions. In addition, we continue to address requests from investors related to repurchasing loans previously sold. While the balances as of ~~September 30, 2012~~March 31, 2013 include a liability for exposure to additional contingencies, including risk of having to repurchase loans previously sold, we recognize that market conditions may result in additional exposure to loss and the extension of time necessary to complete the discontinued mortgage operation.

ASC 820,Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (“ASC 820”), defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value under GAAP and enhances disclosures about fair value measurements. Fair value is defined under ASC 820 as the price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date.

We determine the fair market values of our financial instruments based on the fair value hierarchy as prescribed in ASC 820. The standard describes three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value as provided below.

Level 3

Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities. Level 3 assets and liabilities include financial instruments whose value is determined using pricing models, discounted cash flow methodologies, or similar techniques, as well as instruments for which the determination of fair values requires significant management judgment or estimation. This category also includes impaired loans and OREO where collateral values have been based on third party appraisals; however, due to current economic conditions, comparative sales data typically used in appraisals may be unavailable or more subjective due to lack of market activity.

Assets and liabilities measured at fair value at ~~September 30, 2012~~March 31, 2013 and December 31, ~~2011~~2012 are as follows (in thousands):


September 30, 2012
March 31, 2013
	Fair Value Measurements Using							Fair Value Measurements Using
	Level 1		Level 2			Level 3		Level 1		Level 2			Level 3
Available for sale securities:⁽¹⁾
Residential mortgage-backed securities	$	—	$	68,354		$	—	$	—	$	55,363		$	—
Corporate securities		—		5,150			—		—		5,000			—
Municipals		—		26,063			—		—		19,572			—
Equity securities		—		7,721			—		—		7,592			—
Loans^{(2) (4)}		—		—			10,671		—		—			12,265
OREO^{(3) (4)}		—		—			19,079		—		—			14,426
Derivative asset⁽⁵⁾		—		29,031			—		—		27,491			—
Derivative liability⁽⁵⁾		—		(29,031	)		—		—		(27,491	)		—

December 31, 2011
December 31, 2012
Available for sale securities:⁽¹⁾
Residential mortgage-backed securities	$	—	$	90,083		$	—	$	—	$	61,581		$	—
Corporate securities		—		5,225			—		—		5,080			—
Municipals		—		30,742			—		—		25,894			—
Equity securities		—		7,660			—		—		7,640			—
Other		—		10,000			—
Loans^{(2) (4)}		—		—			12,448		—		—			11,639
OREO^{(3) (4)}		—		—			34,077		—		—			15,991
Derivative asset⁽⁵⁾		—		20,071			—		—		28,465			—
Derivative liability⁽⁵⁾		—		(20,071	)		—		—		(28,465	)		—

Financial instruments are considered Level 3 when their values are determined using pricing models, discounted cash flow methodologies or similar techniques and at least one significant model assumption or input is unobservable. Level 3 financial instruments also include those for which the determination of fair value requires significant management judgment or estimation. Currently, we measure fair value for certain loans on a nonrecurring basis as described below.

During the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30, 2012,~~March 31, 2013, certain impaired loans were reevaluated and reported at fair value through a specific ~~valuation allowance~~ allocation of the allowance for loan losses based upon the fair value of the underlying collateral. The ~~$10.7~~$12.3 million total above includes impaired loans at

~~September 30, 2012~~ March 31, 2013 with a carrying value of ~~$12.1~~$12.7 million that were reduced by specific ~~valuation~~ allowance allocations totaling ~~$1.4 million~~$450,000 for a total reported fair value of ~~$10.7~~$12.3 million based on collateral valuations utilizing Level 3 valuation inputs. Fair values were based on third party appraisals; however, based on the current economic conditions, comparative sales data typically used in the appraisals may be unavailable or more subjective due to the lack of real estate market activity.

Certain foreclosed assets, upon initial recognition, are valued based on third party appraisals less estimated selling costs. At ~~September 30, 2012,~~March 31, 2013, OREO with a carrying value of ~~$23.8~~$18.9 million was reduced by specific valuation allowance allocations totaling ~~$4.7~~$4.5 million for a total reported fair value of ~~$19.1~~$14.4 million based on valuations utilizing Level 3 valuation inputs. Fair values are based on third party appraisals; however, based on the current economic conditions, comparative sales data typically used in the appraisals may be unavailable or more subjective due to the lack of real estate market activity.

Generally accepted accounting principles require disclosure of fair value information about financial instruments, whether or not recognized on the balance sheet, for which it is practical to estimate that value. In cases where quoted market prices are not available, fair values are based on estimates using present value or other valuation techniques. Those techniques are significantly affected by the assumptions used, including the discount rate and estimates of future cash flows. This disclosure does not and is not intended to represent the fair value of the Company.

A summary of the carrying amounts and estimated fair values of financial instruments is as follows (in thousands):


									March 31, 2013				December 31, 2012
	September 30, 2012				December 31, 2011				Carrying		Estimated		Carrying		Estimated
	Carrying Amount		Estimated Fair Value		Carrying Amount		Estimated Fair Value		Amount		Fair Value		Amount		Fair Value
Cash and cash equivalents	$	149,191	$	149,191	$	101,258	$	101,258	$	191,443	$	191,443	$	206,348	$	206,348
Securities, available-for-sale		107,288		107,288		143,710		143,710		87,527		87,527		100,195		100,195
Loans held for sale		2,818,622		2,818,622		2,080,081		2,080,081		2,577,830		2,577,830		3,175,272		3,175,272
Loans held for sale from discontinued operations		304		304		393		393		301		301		302		302
Loans held for investment, net		6,475,367		6,480,374		5,502,076		5,506,899		6,845,011		6,851,752		6,711,198		6,714,031
Derivative asset		29,031		29,031		20,071		20,071		27,491		27,491		28,465		28,465
Deposits		6,717,579		6,718,017		5,556,257		5,557,062		7,745,831		7,746,191		7,440,804		7,441,240
Federal funds purchased		473,330		473,330		412,249		412,249		452,998		452,998		273,179		273,179
Borrowings		1,572,839		1,572,840		1,355,867		1,355,869		485,136		485,138		1,673,982		1,673,983
Subordinated notes		111,000		113,468		—		—		111,000		111,759		111,000		112,757
Trust preferred subordinated debentures		113,406		113,406		113,406		113,406		113,406		113,406		113,406		113,406
Derivative liability		29,031		29,031		20,071		20,071		27,491		27,491		28,465		28,465

The following methods and assumptions were used by the Company in estimating its fair value disclosures for financial instruments:

The carrying amounts reported in the consolidated balance sheet for cash and cash equivalents approximate their fair value, which is characterized as a Level 1 asset in the fair value hierarchy.

The fair value of investment securities is based on prices obtained from independent pricing services which are based on quoted market prices for the same or similar securities, which is characterized as a Level 2 asset in the fair value hierarchy. We have obtained documentation from the primary pricing service we use about their processes and controls over pricing. In addition, on a quarterly basis we independently verify the prices that we receive from the service provider using two additional independent pricing sources. Any significant differences are investigated and resolved.

Loans are characterized as Level 3 assets in the fair value hierarchy. For variable-rate loans that reprice frequently with no significant change in credit risk, fair values are generally based on carrying values. The fair value for all other loans is estimated using discounted cash flow analyses, using interest rates currently being offered for loans with similar terms to borrowers of similar credit quality. The carrying amount of accrued interest approximates its fair value. The carrying amount of loans held for sale approximates fair value.

The estimated fair value of the interest rate swaps ~~and caps~~ are obtained from independent pricing services, which is characterized as a Level 2 asset in the fair value hierarchy. On a quarterly basis, we independently verify the fair value using an additional independent pricing source.

Deposits are characterized as Level 3 ~~assets~~liabilities in the fair value hierarchy. The carrying amounts for variable-rate money market accounts approximate their fair value. Fixed-term certificates of deposit fair values are estimated using a discounted cash flow calculation that applies interest rates currently being offered on certificates to a schedule of aggregated expected monthly maturities.

Federal funds purchased, other borrowings, subordinated notes and trust preferred subordinated debentures

The carrying value reported in the consolidated balance sheet for federal funds purchased and other borrowings approximates their fair value. The fair value of federal funds purchased, other borrowings and trust preferred subordinated debentures isare estimated using a discounted cash flow calculation that applies interest rates currently being offered on similar borrowings, which is characterized as a Level 3 liability in the fair value hierarchy. The subordinated notes are publicly traded and are valued based on market prices, which is characterized as a Level 2 liability in the fair value hierarchy.

The fair value of derivative positions outstanding is included in other assets and other liabilities in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.

During ~~2012~~2013 and ~~2011,~~2012, we entered into certain interest rate derivative positions that are not designated as hedging instruments. These derivative positions relate to transactions in which we enter into an interest rate swap, cap and/or floor with a customer while at the same time entering into an offsetting interest rate swap, cap and/or floor with another financial institution. In connection with each swap transaction, we agree to pay interest to the customer on a notional amount at a variable interest rate and receive interest from the customer on a similar notional amount at a fixed interest rate. At the same time, we agree to pay another financial institution the same fixed interest rate on the same notional amount and receive the same variable interest rate on the same notional amount. The transaction allows our customer to effectively convert a variable rate loan to a fixed rate. Because we act as an intermediary for our customer, changes in the fair value of the underlying derivative contracts substantially offset each other and do not have a material impact on our results of operations.

The notional amounts and estimated fair values of interest rate derivative positions outstanding at ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2013 and 2012 ~~and 2011~~ are presented in the following tables (in thousands):


	September 30, 2012						September 30, 2011						March 31, 2013						December 31, 2012
	Notional Amount			Estimated Fair Value			Notional Amount			Estimated Fair Value			Notional Amount			Estimated Fair Value			Notional Amount			Estimated Fair Value
Non-hedging interest rate derivative:
Commercial loan/lease interest rate swaps	$	436,265		$	29,038		$	254,063		$	19,193		$	637,437		$	27,497		$	523,216		$	28,469
Commercial loan/lease interest rate swaps		(436,265	)		(29,038	)		(254,063	)		(19,193	)		(637,437	)		(27,497	)		(523,216	)		(28,469	)
Commercial loan/lease interest rate caps		(37,465	)		(7	)		—			—			(45,495	)		(6	)		(42,380	)		(4	)
Commercial loan/lease interest rate caps		37,465			7			—			—			45,495			6			42,380			4

The weighted-average receive and pay interest rates for interest rate swaps outstanding at ~~September 30, 2012~~March 31, 2013 were as follows:

The weighted-average strike rate for outstanding interest rate caps was ~~2.21%~~1.98% at ~~September 30, 2012.~~March 31, 2013.

Our credit exposure on interest rate swaps and caps is limited to the net favorable value and interest payments of all swaps and caps by each counterparty. In such cases collateral may be required from the counterparties involved if the net value of the swaps and caps exceeds a nominal amount considered to be immaterial. Our credit exposure, net of any collateral pledged, relating to interest rate swaps and caps was approximately ~~$29.0~~$27.5 million at ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2013 and approximately $28.5 million at December 31, 2012, all of which relates to bank customers. Collateral levels are monitored and adjusted on a regular basis for changes in interest rate swap and cap values. At ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, we had ~~$15.9~~$17.4 million and $17.1 million, respectively, in cash collateral pledged for these derivatives included in interest-bearing deposits.

WeOn March 28, 2013, we completed a sale of 6.0 million shares of 6.5% non-cumulative preferred stock, par value $0.01, with a liquidation preference of $25 per share, in a public offering. Dividends on the preferred stock are ~~aggressively defending against a $65.4 million jury verdict that was rendered in August 2011, in rural southeastern Oklahoma. Post-trial motions were denied without comment in early July 2012,~~not cumulative and ~~an appeal has been filed in the Oklahoma Supreme Court.~~

~~The Oklahoma case was filed in May 2010~~will be paid when declared by ~~one~~our board of the guarantors of a defaulted loan to an auto dealership in Hugo, Oklahoma, after we already had filed suit in Texas against the debtor and the three co-guarantors to recover the debt, and despite a forum selection clause in the guaranty requiring that any lawsuits be brought in Texas. The guarantor conceded he had signed the guaranty and that the guaranty was valid, but complained that he later had been defrauded because we had failed to notify him about on-going fraud at the dealership. We disputed that we had any such duty to him as guarantor under Oklahoma law, particularly since the guaranty expressly disclaimed such a duty and since he was a co-owner and salaried employee of the dealership. We repeatedly objecteddirectors to the case proceeding in Oklahoma in view of the clause requiring any lawsuit to be brought in Texas, but these objections were rejected. We then obtained an injunction from the Texas court against the guarantor proceeding with the Oklahoma suit, but the guarantor nevertheless continued to trial in the Oklahoma suit in violation of that injunction.

Lacking much arguable economic loss, if any, the guarantor repeatedly emphasized to the jury in the Oklahoma case that we were claiming about $6.7 million, plus accumulating interest, on the debt and guaranty in the Texas lawsuit, and that we were asking for those damages to be trebled because of RICO violations. The Oklahoma jury proceeded to award the guarantor a total of $21.8 million in money damages, which was almost exactly three times his estimated prospective liability on his guaranty, and went on to award twice that amount in punitive damages.

Subsequent to the verdict in the Oklahoma case, the Texas Court of Appeals upheld the injunction and specifically ruled that the guaranty’s forum selection clause required any claims by the guarantor to be brought in the Texas court.

~~We have been advised by counsel~~extent that we have ~~numerous grounds~~lawfully available funds to ~~reverse~~pay dividends. If declared, dividends will accrue and be payable quarterly, in arrears, on the ~~Oklahoma verdict entirely~~liquidation preference amount, on a non-cumulative basis, at a rate of 6.50% per annum. Holders of preferred stock will not have voting rights, except with respect to authorizing or ~~substantially reduce~~increasing the authorized amount ~~such as~~of senior stock, certain changes in the ~~guarantor’s pursuit~~terms of the ~~Oklahoma case in violation of~~preferred stock, certain dividend non-payments and as otherwise required by applicable law. Net proceeds from the ~~forum selection clause in~~sale totaled $145.1 million. The additional equity is being used for general corporate purposes, including funding regulatory capital infusions into the guaranty and the Texas court’s injunction, the absence of any alleged contractual or other legal duty to the guarantor, and the lack of proof of actual economic damages. In addition, we continued to pursue the Texas lawsuit over the guaranty, and on April 18, 2012, we received summary judgment ordering the guarantor to pay us approximately $7 million on the debt, which could offset a portion of any arguable liability in the Oklahoma case.

In reaction to these post-trial developments, the guarantor has re-asserted the same claims that are the basis for his Oklahoma judgment as counterclaims in the Texas action. We have moved for summary judgment against the guarantor on these claims.

We believe that the foregoing orders and judgments, when finalized by the Texas trial court, would constitute final binding and immediately enforceable judgments which would constitute a legal bar to the Oklahoma judgment.

In light of these factors, we currently believe a materially negative outcome in this matter is not probable, despite the uncertainties inherent in litigation. We further have not been able to determine the amount or range of amounts, as likely for any liability. We thus have not established a reserve related to any potential exposure. The loss related to the loan was recognized in the second quarter of 2010 and we have no remaining balance sheet exposure on the principal balance of the loan.Bank.

ASU ~~2011-04, “Fair Value Measurement~~2013-01, “Balance Sheet (Topic ~~820)~~210) – ~~Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurements~~Clarifying the Scope of Disclosures about Offsetting Assets and ~~Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP and IFRSs”~~Liabilities” (“ASU ~~2011-04”~~2013-01”) amends Topic ~~820, “Fair Value Measurements~~210, “Balance Sheet” to clarify that the scope of ASU 2011-11, “Balance Sheet (Topic 210): Disclosures about Offsetting Assets and ~~Disclosures,”~~Liabilities” would apply to ~~converge the fair value measurement guidance~~derivatives including bifurcated embedded derivatives, repurchase agreements and reverse repurchase agreements and securities borrowing and securities lending transactions that are either offset in ~~U.S. generally accepted accounting principles~~accordance with Topic 815, “Derivatives and ~~International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”)~~Hedging”. ASU ~~2011-04 clarifies the application of existing fair value measurement requirements, changes certain principles in Topic 820 and requires additional fair value disclosures. ASU 2011-04 is~~2013-01 was effective ~~for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2011,~~January 1, 2013 and did not have a significant impact on our financial statements.

ASU ~~2011-05,~~2013-02, “Comprehensive Income (Topic 220) – ~~Presentation~~Reporting of ~~Comprehensive Income”~~ (“ASU 2011-05”) amends Topic 220, “Comprehensive Income,” to require that all non-owner changes in stockholders’ equity be presented in either a single continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two separate but consecutive statements. Additionally, ASU 2011-05 requires entities to present, on the face of the financial statements, reclassification adjustments for items that are reclassified from other comprehensive income to net income in the statement or statements where the components of net income and the components of other comprehensive income are presented. The option to present components of other comprehensive income as part of the statement of changes in stockholders’ equity was eliminated. ASU 2011-05 is effective for annual and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2011; however certain provisions related to the presentation of reclassification adjustments have been deferred by ASU 2011-12 “Comprehensive Income (Topic 820) – Deferral of the Effective Date for Amendments to the Presentation of Reclassifications of ItemsAmounts Reclassified Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive ~~Income in Accounting Standards Update No. 2011-05.” ASU 2011-05 did not have a significant impact on our financial statements.~~

~~ASU 2011-08, “Intangibles – Goodwill and Other (Topic 350) – Testing Goodwill for Impairment”~~Income” (“ASU ~~2011-08”~~2013-02”) amends Topic ~~350, “Intangibles – Goodwill and Other,”~~220, “Comprehensive Income” to ~~give entities~~improve the ~~option to first assess qualitative factors to determine whether the existence~~reporting of ~~events or circumstances leads to a determination that it is more likely than not that the fair value~~reclassifications out of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount. If, after assessing the totality of events or circumstances, an entity determines it is not more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount, then performing the two-step impairment test is unnecessary. However, if an entity concludes otherwise, then it isaccumulated other comprehensive income. Entities are required to ~~perform~~separately present significant amounts reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income for each component of accumulated other comprehensive income and to disclose, for each affected line item in the ~~first step of~~income statement, the ~~two-step impairment test by calculating the fair value of the reporting unit and comparing the fair value with the carrying~~ amount of ~~the reporting unit.~~accumulated other comprehensive income that has been reclassified into that line item. ASU ~~2011-08 is~~2013-02 was effective ~~of annual~~for fiscal years, and interim ~~impairment tests~~periods within those years, beginning after December ~~15, 2011,~~13, 2012 and did not have a significant impact on our financial statements.


	For the three months ended September 30, 2012							For the three months ended September 30, 2011							For the three months ended March 31, 2013							For the three months ended March 31, 2012
	Average Balance		Revenue/ Expense⁽¹⁾		Yield/ Rate			Average Balance		Revenue/ Expense⁽¹⁾		Yield/ Rate			Average Balance		Revenue/ Expense⁽¹⁾		Yield/ Rate			Average Balance		Revenue/ Expense⁽¹⁾		Yield/ Rate
Assets
Securities – taxable	$	84,583	$	881		4.14	%	$	115,871	$	1,214		4.16	%	$	71,220	$	729		4.15	%	$	109,003	$	1,041		3.84	%
Securities – non-taxable⁽²⁾		25,717		376		5.82	%		33,051		477		5.73	%		22,174		323		5.91	%		28,506		409		5.77	%
Federal funds sold		9,360		2		0.09	%		20,864		3		0.06	%		24,785		6		0.10	%		6,848		1		0.06	%
Deposits in other banks		64,859		54		0.33	%		36,495		44		0.48	%		78,718		52		0.27	%		49,470		49		0.40	%
Loans held for sale		2,432,027		24,433		4.00	%		1,191,375		13,340		4.44	%		2,362,646		22,641		3.89	%		2,036,622		21,315		4.21	%
Loans		6,313,263		76,397		4.81	%		5,219,496		68,352		5.20	%		6,842,766		80,541		4.77	%		5,660,993		70,459		5.01	%
Less reserve for loan losses		72,373		—		—			66,215		—		—			74,442		—		—			70,261		—		—

Loans, net of reserve		8,672,917		100,830		4.63	%		6,344,656		81,692		5.11	%		9,130,970		103,182		4.58	%		7,627,354		91,774		4.84	%

Total earning assets		8,857,436		102,143		4.59	%		6,550,937		83,430		5.05	%		9,327,867		104,292		4.53	%		7,821,181		93,274		4.80	%
Cash and other assets		399,428							333,563							401,692							388,009

Total assets	$	9,256,864						$	6,884,500						$	9,729,559						$	8,209,190


Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity
Transaction deposits	$	803,776	$	247		0.12	%	$	412,203	$	52		0.05	%	$	1,003,735	$	253		0.10	%	$	565,319	$	140		0.10	%
Savings deposits		2,922,852		2,185		0.30	%		2,253,123		1,664		0.29	%		3,246,675		2,297		0.29	%		2,535,412		2,083		0.33	%
Time deposits		491,783		576		0.47	%		468,196		1,032		0.87	%		403,113		414		0.42	%		624,823		920		0.59	%
Deposits in foreign branches		431,412		370		0.34	%		588,221		443		0.30	%		335,265		281		0.34	%		409,422		329		0.32	%

Total interest bearing deposits		4,649,823		3,378		0.29	%		3,721,743		3,191		0.34	%		4,988,788		3,245		0.26	%		4,134,976		3,472		0.34	%
Other borrowings		1,639,953		878		0.21	%		894,073		240		0.11	%		1,041,573		429		0.17	%		1,554,716		719		0.19	%
Subordinated notes		12,065		208		6.86	%		—		—		—			111,000		1,829		6.68	%		—		—		—
Trust preferred subordinated debentures		113,406		692		2.43	%		113,406		634		2.22	%		113,406		634		2.27	%		113,406		711		2.52	%

Total interest bearing liabilities		6,415,247		5,156		0.32	%		4,729,222		4,065		0.34	%		6,254,767		6,137		0.40	%		5,803,098		4,902		0.34	%
Demand deposits		2,010,694							1,525,087							2,529,927							1,700,390
Other liabilities		80,810							53,233							90,538							78,108
Stockholders’ equity		750,113							576,958							854,327							627,594

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	9,256,864						$	6,884,500						$	9,729,559						$	8,209,190



Net interest income			$	96,987						$	79,365						$	98,155						$	88,372

Net interest margin						4.36	%						4.81	%						4.27	%						4.54	%
Net interest spread						4.27	%						4.71	%						4.13	%						4.46	%

Additional information from discontinued operations:
Loans held for sale	$	384						$	396						$	302						$	392
Borrowed funds		384							396							302							392
Net interest income			$	5						$	8						$	6						$	8
Net interest margin - consolidated						4.36	%						4.81	%						4.27	%						4.54	%

ITEM 2.

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Statements and financial analysis contained in this document that are not historical facts are forward looking statements made pursuant to the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (the “Act”). In addition, certain statements may be contained in our future filings with SEC, in press releases, and in oral and written statements made by or with our approval that are not statements of historical fact and constitute forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Act. Forward looking statements describe our future plans, strategies and expectations and are based on certain assumptions. Words such as “believes”, “anticipates”, “expects”, “intends”, “targeted”, “continue”, “remain”, “will”, “should”, “may” and other similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements but are not the exclusive means of identifying such statements.

Forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties, many of which are beyond our control that may cause actual results to differ materially from those in such statements. The important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from the forward looking statements include, but are not limited to, the following:

Forward-looking statements speak only as of the date on which such statements are made. We have no obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements as a result of new information or future events. In light of these assumptions, risks and uncertainties, the events discussed in any forward-looking statements in this quarterly report might not occur.

Except as otherwise noted, all amounts and disclosures throughout this document reflect continuing operations. See Part I, Item 1 herein for a discussion of discontinued operations at Note (9) – Discontinued Operations.

We reported net income and net income available to common shareholders of ~~$32.6~~$33.1 million, or $0.80 per diluted common share, for the ~~third~~first quarter of ~~2012~~2013 compared to ~~$21.7~~$27.1 million, or ~~$0.56~~$0.70 per diluted common share, for the ~~third~~first quarter of ~~2011.~~2012. The dividend on preferred shares reduced income available to common shareholders by $81,000 during the first quarter of 2013. Return on average common equity was 17.27% and return on average assets was 1.40% for the third quarter of 2012, compared to 14.93% and 1.25%, respectively, for the third quarter of 2011. Net income for the nine months ended September 30,

~~2012 totaled $89.3 million, or $2.25 per diluted common share, compared to $50.4 million, or $1.31 per diluted common share, for the same period in 2011. Return on average equity was 17.56%~~15.82% and return on average assets was 1.38% for the ~~nine months ended September 30, 2012,~~first quarter of 2013, compared to ~~12.07%~~17.36% and ~~1.05%~~1.33%, respectively, for the ~~nine months ended September 30, 2011.~~first quarter of 2012.

Net income increased ~~$10.9~~$6.0 million, or ~~50%~~22%, for the three months ended ~~September 30, 2012~~March 31, 2013 as compared to the same period in ~~2011.~~2012. The ~~$10.9~~$6.0 million increase during the three months ended ~~September 30, 2012,~~March 31, 2013, was primarily the result of a ~~$17.7~~$9.8 million increase in net interest income, a ~~$4.0~~$1.0 million decrease in the provision for credit losses and a $2.9 million increase in non-interest income, offset by an $7.3 million increase in non-interest expense and a $6.4 million increase in income tax expense. The $38.9 million increase during the nine months ended September 30, 2012 was primarily the result of a $60.9 million increase in net interest income, a $15.5 million decrease in the provision for credit losses and a $7.0$2.1 million increase in non-interest income, offset by a ~~$22.0~~$3.4 million increase in non-interest expense and a ~~$22.5~~$3.4 million increase in income tax expense.

Details of the changes in the various components of net income are further discussed below.

Net interest income was ~~$96.9~~$98.0 million for the ~~third~~first quarter of ~~2012,~~2013, compared to ~~$79.2~~$88.2 million for the ~~third~~first quarter of ~~2011.~~2012. The increase was due to an increase in average earning assets of ~~$2.3~~$1.5 billion as compared to the ~~third~~first quarter of ~~2011.~~2012. The increase in average earning assets included a ~~$1.1~~$1.2 billion increase in average loans held for investment and a ~~$1.2 billion~~$326.0 million increase in loans held for sale, offset by a ~~$38.6~~$44.1 million decrease in average securities. For the quarter ended ~~September 30, 2012,~~March 31, 2013, average net loans and securities represented 98% and 1%, respectively, of average earning assets compared to ~~97%~~98% and 2% in the same quarter of ~~2011.~~2012.

Average interest bearing liabilities increased ~~$1.7 billion~~$451.7 million from the ~~third~~first quarter of ~~2011,~~2012, which included a ~~$928.1~~$853.8 million increase in interest bearing deposits and a ~~$745.9 billion~~$111.0 million increase in subordinated notes, offset by a $513.1 million decrease in other borrowings. ~~The increase in average other borrowings was directly related to the growth in loans held for sale.~~ Demand deposits increased from ~~$1.5~~$1.7 billion at ~~September 30, 2011~~March 31, 2012 to ~~$2.0~~$2.5 billion at ~~September 30, 2012.~~March 31, 2013. The average cost of interest bearing deposits decreased from .34% for the quarter ended ~~September 30, 2011~~March 31, 2012 to ~~.29%~~.26% for the same period of ~~2012.~~2013. The change in funding composition ~~reduced~~decreased the cost of interest bearing deposits and borrowed funds to ~~.28%~~.25% in the ~~third~~first quarter of ~~2012~~2013 compared to ~~.29%~~.30% in the ~~third~~first quarter of ~~2011.~~

Net interest income was $275.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2012, compared to $214.8 million for the same period of 2011. The increase was due to an increase in average earning assets of $2.1 billion as compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2011. The increase in average earning assets included a $1.0 billion increase in average loans held for investment and a $1.3 billion increase in loans held for sale, offset by a $40.9 million decrease in average securities. For the nine months ended September 30, 2012, average net loans and securities represented 98% and 1%, respectively, of average earning assets compared to 95% and 3% in the same period of 2011.

Average interest bearing liabilities increased $1.7 billion compared to the first nine months of 2011, which included a $585.6 million increase in interest bearing deposits and a $1.1 billion increase in other borrowings. The increase in average other borrowings was directly related to the growth in loans held for sale. Demand deposits increased from $1.5 billion at September 30, 2011 to $1.9 billion at September 30, 2012. The average cost of interest bearing deposits decreased from .40% for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 to .31% for the same period of 2012. The change in funding composition reduced the cost of deposits and borrowed funds to .29% for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 compared to .38% in the same period of 2011.

The following table presents the changes (in thousands) in taxable-equivalent net interest income and identifies the changes due to differences in the average volume of earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities and the changes due to changes in the average interest rate on those assets and liabilities.


	Three months ended September 30, 2012/2011									Nine months ended September 30, 2012/2011									Three months ended March 30, 2013/2012
	Net			Change Due To						Net			Change Due To⁽¹⁾						Net			Change Due To
	Change			Volume			Yield/Rate			Change			Volume			Yield/Rate			Change			Volume			Yield/Rate
Interest income:
Securities⁽²⁾	$	(434	)	$	(437	)	$	3		$	(1,535	)	$	(1,392	)	$	(143	)	$	(398	)	$	(460	)	$	62
Loans held for sale		11,093			13,808			(2,715	)		35,227			43,836			(8,609	)		1,326			2,985			(1,659	)
Loans held for investment		8,045			13,961			(5,916	)		28,427			40,211			(11,784	)		10,082			13,781			(3,699	)
Federal funds sold		(1	)		(2	)		1			(29	)		(25	)		(4	)		5			3			2
Deposits in other banks		10			34			(24	)		(155	)		(168	)		13			3			22			(19	)

Total		18,713			27,364			(8,651	)		61,935			82,462			(20,527	)		11,018			16,331			(5,313	)
Transaction deposits		195			49			146			423			133			290			113			107			6
Savings deposits		521			489			32			640			757			(117	)		214			535			(321	)
Time deposits		(456	)		52			(508	)		(1,977	)		(41	)		(1,936	)		(506	)		(329	)		(177	)
Deposits in foreign branches		(73	)		(120	)		47			(233	)		(90	)		(143	)		(48	)		(63	)		15
Borrowed funds		904			200			704			2,268			1,179			1,089			1,462			(239	)		1,701

Total		1,091			670			421			1,121			1,938			(817	)		1,235			11			1,224

Net interest income	$	17,622		$	26,694		$	(9,072	)	$	60,814		$	80,524		$	(19,710	)	$	9,783		$	16,320		$	(6,537	)

Net interest margin from continuing operations, the ratio of net interest income to average earning assets from continuing operations, was ~~4.36%~~4.27% for the ~~third~~first quarter of ~~2012~~2013 compared to ~~4.81%~~4.54% for the ~~third~~first quarter of ~~2011.~~2012. This 4527 basis point decrease was a result of a decrease in interest income as a percent of earning assets offset by a reduction in funding costs. Funding cost including demand deposits and borrowed funds decreased from

..23% for the first quarter of 2012 to .17% for the first quarter of 2013. The cost of subordinated debt issued in September 2012 and the trust preferred as a percent of total earning assets was ..11% for the first quarter of 2013. Total cost of funding, including ~~demand~~all deposits and stockholders’ equity ~~decreased~~increased from ~~.23%~~.24% for the ~~third~~first quarter of ~~2011~~2012 to ~~.22%~~.26% for the ~~third~~first quarter of ~~2012.~~2013.


	Three months ended September 30,				Nine months ended September 30,				Three months ended March 31,
	2012		2011		2012		2011		2013		2012
Service charges on deposit accounts	$	1,684	$	1,585	$	4,912	$	4,976	$	1,701	$	1,604
Trust fee income		1,216		1,091		3,562		3,111		1,241		1,114
Bank owned life insurance (BOLI) income		549		533		1,658		1,595		498		521
Brokered loan fees		4,839		2,849		12,618		7,927		4,744		3,651
Swap fees										1,652		797
Other		2,264		1,545		7,454		5,629		1,445		1,503

Total non-interest income	$	10,552	$	7,603	$	30,204	$	23,238	$	11,281	$	9,190

Non-interest income increased ~~$2.9~~$2.1 million during the three months ended ~~September 30, 2012~~March 31, 2013 compared to the same period of ~~2011.~~2012. This increase is primarily related to an increase of ~~$2.0~~$1.1 million in brokered loan fees ~~which relates~~due to an increase in our mortgage warehouse lending ~~business.~~

~~Non-interest~~volume. Swap fee income increased ~~$7.0 million~~$855,000 during the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September 30, 2012~~March 31, 2013 compared to the same period of ~~2011. This increase is primarily related~~2012 due to an increase ~~of $4.7 million~~ in ~~brokered loan~~swap transactions. Swap fees ~~which relates~~are fees related to customer swap transactions and are received from the institution that is our ~~mortgage warehouse lending business and a $1.9 million increase in other non-interest income, primarily due to swap fee income.~~counterparty on the transaction. See Note 11 – Derivative Financial Instruments for further discussion.

While management expects continued growth in non-interest income, the future rate of growth could be affected by increased competition from nationwide and regional financial institutions. In order to achieve continued growth in non-interest income, we may need to introduce new products or enter into new lines of business or expand existing lines of business. Any new product introduction or new market entry could place additional demands on capital and managerial resources.


	Three months ended September 30,				Nine months ended September 30,				Three months ended March 31,
	2012		2011		2012		2011		2013		2012
Salaries and employee benefits	$	31,009	$	25,596	$	90,258	$	73,877	$	33,541	$	29,019
Net occupancy expense		3,653		3,367		10,936		10,120		3,857		3,604
Marketing		3,472		2,455		9,469		7,311		3,972		2,823
Legal and professional		4,916		3,647		12,237		10,634		3,940		3,991
Communications and technology		2,885		2,210		8,088		7,141		3,122		2,483
FDIC insurance assessment		1,332		1,465		4,497		5,948
Allowance and other carrying costs for OREO		552		2,150		7,706		7,203		430		3,342
Other		5,702		5,296		16,579		15,614		6,838		7,014

Total non-interest expense	$	53,521	$	46,186	$	159,770	$	137,848	$	55,700	$	52,276

Non-interest expense for the ~~third~~first quarter of ~~2012~~2013 increased ~~$7.3~~$3.4 million, or ~~16%~~7%, to ~~$53.5~~$55.7 million from ~~$46.2~~$52.3 million in the ~~second~~first quarter of ~~2011.~~2012. The increase is primarily attributable to a ~~$5.4~~$4.5 million increase in salaries and employee benefits, which was primarily due to general business growth and incentive expense directly related to our performance and the increase in the price of our common stock.

Marketing expense for the three months ended ~~September 30, 2012~~March 31, 2013 increased ~~$1.0~~$1.1 million, or ~~41%~~39%, compared to the same quarter in ~~2011,~~2012, which was primarily due to general business growth and treasury management programs.

Legal and professional expense for the three months ended September 30, 2012 increased $1.3 million, or 35%, compared to same quarter in 2011. Our legal and professional expense will continue to fluctuate from quarter to quarter and could increase in the future as we respond to continued regulatory changes, strategic initiatives, litigation and other developments.

For the three months ended ~~September 30, 2012,~~March 31, 2013, allowance and other carrying costs for OREO decreased ~~$1.6~~$2.9 million, to ~~$552,000, $64,000~~$430,000, $71,000 of which related to deteriorating values of assets held in OREO. The ~~$64,000~~$71,000 valuation expense in the ~~third~~first quarter of ~~2012~~2013 related to direct write-downs of the OREO balance.

Non-interest expense for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 increased $22.0 million, or 16%, to $159.8 million from $137.8 million compared to the same period in 2011. The increase is primarily attributable to an $16.4 million increase in salaries and employee benefits, which was primarily due to general business growth and incentive expense directly related to our performance and the increase in the price of our common stock.

Marketing expense for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 increased $2.2 million, or 30%, compared to the same quarter in 2011, which was primarily due to general business growth and treasury management programs.

Legal and professional expense for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 increased $1.6 million, or 15%, compared to same quarter in 2011. Our legal and professional expense will continue to fluctuate from quarter to quarter and could increase in the future as we respond to continued regulatory changes, strategic initiatives, litigation and other developments.

FDIC insurance assessment expense for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 decreased by $1.5 million from $5.9 million in 2011 to $4.5 million as a result of changes to the FDIC assessment method in 2011.

For the nine months ended September 30, 2012, allowance and other carrying costs for OREO increased $503,000, to $7.7 million, $5.9 million of which related to deteriorating values of assets held in OREO. Of the $5.9 million valuation expense in the first nine months of 2012, $3.6 million related to increasing the valuation allowance and $2.3 million related to direct write-downs of the OREO balance.

Total loans net of allowance for loan losses at ~~September 30, 2012 increased $1.7 billion~~March 31, 2013 decreased $592.5 million from December 31, ~~2011~~2012 to ~~$9.3~~$9.4 billion. Combined commercial, construction and real estate loans ~~and leases~~ increased ~~$1.0 billion,~~$139.9 million, offset by a combined decrease in ~~real estate and~~ consumer loans and leases of ~~$19.7~~$4.9 million. Loans held for sale ~~increased $738.5~~decreased $597.4 million from December 31, ~~2011~~2012 as a result of ~~continued low mortgage rates.~~seasonal trends.


							March 31,			December 31,
	September 30, 2012			December 31, 2011			2013			2012
Commercial	$	4,038,955		$	3,275,150		$	4,155,683		$	4,106,419
Construction		649,375			422,026			760,964			737,637
Real estate		1,804,434			1,819,251			1,959,808			1,892,451
Consumer		19,975			24,822			17,464			19,493
Leases		74,207			61,792			66,603			69,470

Gross loans held for investment		6,586,946			5,603,041			6,960,522			6,825,470
Deferred income (net of direct origination costs)		(37,857	)		(30,670	)		(40,511	)		(39,935	)
Allowance for loan losses		(73,722	)		(70,295	)		(75,000	)		(74,337	)

Total loans held for investment, net		6,475,367			5,502,076			6,845,011			6,711,198
Loans held for sale		2,818,622			2,080,081			2,577,830			3,175,272

Total	$	9,293,989		$	7,582,157		$	9,422,841		$	9,886,470

We continue to lend primarily in Texas. As of ~~September 30, 2012,~~March 31, 2013, a substantial majority of the principal amount of the loans held for investment in our portfolio was to businesses and successful professionals and entrepreneurs in Texas. This geographic concentration subjects the loan portfolio to the general economic conditions in Texas. The risks created by these concentrations have been considered by management in the determination of the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses. Management believes the allowance for loan losses is ~~adequate~~appropriate to cover estimated losses on loans at each balance sheet date.

We originate a substantial majority of all the loans held for investment. We also participate in syndicated loan relationships, both as a participant and as an agent. As of ~~September 30, 2012,~~March 31, 2013, we have ~~$1.3~~$1.2 billion in syndicated loans, ~~$357.1~~$323.1 million of which we acted as agent. All syndicated loans, whether we act as agent or participant, are underwritten to the same standards as all other loans originated by us. In addition, as of ~~September 30, 2012, $18.1 million~~March 31, 2013, none of our syndicated loans were on ~~non-accrual, with $17.8 million earning on a cash basis.~~non-accrual.

Loans held for sale ~~relates to~~consist of legal ownership interests purchased in single-family residential mortgages funded through our ~~mortgage~~ warehouse lending ~~operations where we invest in mortgage loan participations that~~group. These loans are ~~highly liquid and held by us~~typically on our balance sheet for ~~a short period, usually less than 30 days and more typically sold within~~ 10 to 20 ~~days.~~days or less. We have agreements with mortgage lenders and purchase ~~participations~~legal ownership interest in ~~mortgage~~individual loans from regional mortgage originators throughout the country. Volumes fluctuate based on the level of market demand in the product and the number of days between purchase and sale of the participated loans. Ifthey originate. All loans are ~~not sold in accordance~~underwritten consistent with ~~the terms of the agreements, loans could be transferred to the loans held~~established programs for ~~investment portfolio at a lower of cost or fair value. The~~permanent financing with financially sound investors. Substantially all loans are ~~then subject~~conforming loans or loans eligible for sale to ~~normal loan review, grading and reserve allocation requirements. During 2012 and 2011, no loan participations have been transferred to loans held for investment and there has been no loss on sale~~federal agencies or ~~disposition of any loan participation.~~government sponsored entities.

The provision for credit losses is a charge to earnings to maintain the reserve for loan losses at a level consistent with management’s assessment of the loan portfolio in light of current economic conditions and market trends. We recorded a provision of ~~$3.0~~$2.0 million during the ~~third~~first quarter of 2013 compared to $3.0 million in the first quarter of 2012 ~~compared to $7.0~~and $4.5 million in the ~~third quarter of 2011 and $1.0 million in the second~~fourth quarter of 2012. The amount of reserves and provision required to support the reserve generally increased in 2009 and 2010 as a result of credit deterioration in our loan portfolio driven by negative changes in national and regional economic conditions and

~~the impact of those conditions on the financial condition of borrowers and the values of assets, including real estate assets, pledged as collateral. However, in 2011 and continuing in 2012 we~~We have experienced improvements in credit quality and seen levels of reserves and provision decrease. We do continue to maintain

an unallocated reserve component to allow for continued uncertainty in economic and other conditions affecting the quality of the loan portfolio. We believe the level of unallocated reserves at March 31, 2013 continues to be warranted due to the ongoing weak economic environment which has produced more frequent losses, including those resulting from fraud by borrowers.

The reserve for loan losses is comprised of specific reserves for impaired loans and an estimate of losses inherent in the portfolio at the balance sheet date, but not yet identified with specified loans. We regularly evaluate our reserve for loan losses to maintain an appropriate level to absorb estimated loan losses inherent in the loan portfolio. Factors contributing to the determination of reserves include the credit worthiness of the borrower, changes in the value of pledged collateral, and general economic conditions. All loan commitments rated substandard or worse and greater than $500,000 are specifically reviewed for loss potential. For loans deemed to be impaired, a specific allocation is assigned based on the losses expected to be realized from those loans. For purposes of determining the general reserve, the portfolio is segregated by product types to recognize differing risk profiles among categories, and then further segregated by credit grades. Credit grades are assigned to all loans. Each credit grade is assigned a risk factor, or reserve allocation percentage. These risk factors are multiplied by the outstanding principal balance and risk-weighted by product type to calculate the required reserve. A similar process is employed to calculate a reserve assigned to off-balance sheet commitments, specifically unfunded loan commitments and letters of credit. Even though portions of the allowance may be allocated to specific loans, the entire allowance is available for any credit that, in management’s judgment, should be charged off.

The reserve allocation percentages assigned to each credit grade have been developed based primarily on an analysis of our historical loss rates. The allocations are adjusted for certain qualitative factors for such things as general economic conditions, changes in credit policies and lending standards. Changes in the trend and severity of problem loans can cause the estimation of losses to differ from past experience. In addition, the reserve considers the results of reviews performed by independent third party reviewers as reflected in their confirmations of assigned credit grades within the portfolio. The portion of the allowance that is not derived by the allowance allocation percentages compensates for the uncertainty and complexity in estimating loan and lease losses including factors and conditions that may not be fully reflected in the determination and application of the allowance allocation percentages. We evaluate many factors and conditions in determining the unallocated portion of the allowance, including the economic and business conditions affecting key lending areas, credit quality trends and general growth in the portfolio. The allowance is considered appropriate, given management’s assessment of potential losses within the portfolio as of the evaluation date, the significant growth in the loan and lease portfolio, current economic conditions in the Company’s market areas and other factors.

The methodology used in the periodic review of reserve adequacy, which is performed at least quarterly, is designed to be dynamic and responsive to changes in portfolio credit quality. The changes are reflected in the general reserve and in specific reserves as the collectability of larger classified loans are evaluated with new information. As our portfolio has matured, historical loss ratios have been closely monitored, and our reserve adequacy relies primarily on our loss history. The review of reserve adequacy is performed by executive management and presented to our board of directors for their review, consideration and ratification on a quarterly basis.

The combined reserve for credit losses, which includes a liability for losses on unfunded commitments, totaled ~~$77.2~~$79.0 million at ~~September 30, 2012, $72.8~~March 31, 2013, $78.2 million at December 31, ~~2011~~2012 and ~~$70.2~~$74.9 million at ~~September 30, 2011.~~March 31, 2012. Due to the growth in loans, the total reserve percentage decreased to ~~1.18%~~1.14% at ~~September 30, 2012~~March 31, 2013 from ~~1.31%~~1.15% and 1.29% of loans held for investment at December 31, ~~2011~~2012 and ~~decreased from 1.32% of loans held for investment at September 30, 2011.~~March 31, 2012, respectively. The total reserve percentage had increased in ~~2009 and~~ 2010 as a result of the effects of national and regional economic conditions on borrowers and values of assets pledged as collateral. The combined reserve percentage is starting to trend down as we recognize losses on loans for which there were specific or general allocations of reserves and see improvement in our overall credit quality. The overall reserve for loan losses continues to result from consistent application of the loan loss reserve methodology as described above. At ~~September 30, 2012,~~March 31, 2013, we believe the reserve is sufficient to cover all expected losses in the portfolio and has been derived from consistent application of the methodology described above. Should any of the factors considered by management in evaluating the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses change, our estimate of expected losses in the portfolio could also change, which would affect the level of future provisions for loan losses.

Activity in the reserve for loan losses is presented in the following table (in thousands):


	Nine months ended September 30,			Nine months ended September 30,			Year ended December 31,			Three months ended March 31,			Year ended December 31,			Three months ended March 31,
	2012			2011			2011			2013			2012			2012
Reserve for loan losses:
Beginning balance	$	70,295		$	71,510		$	71,510		$	74,337		$	70,295		$	70,295
Loans charged-off:
Commercial		2,664			7,170			8,518			1,648			6,708			462
Real estate - term		899			18,837			21,275			105			899			559
Consumer		49			317			317			19			49			—
Equipment leases		170			980			1,218			—			204			95

Total charge-offs		3,782			27,304			31,328			1,772			7,860			1,116
Recoveries:
Commercial		482			798			1,188			397			832			159
Real estate - construction		10			248			248			—			10			—
Real estate - term		586			305			350			8			812			108
Consumer		26			5			9			30			33			5
Equipment leases		87			212			383			121			108			16

Total recoveries		1,191			1,568			2,178			556			1,795			288

Net charge-offs		2,591			25,736			29,150			1,216			6,065			828
Provision for loan losses		6,018			22,123			27,935			1,879			10,107			2,525

Ending balance	$	73,722		$	67,897		$	70,295		$	75,000		$	74,337		$	71,992

Reserve for off-balance sheet credit losses:
Beginning balance	$	2,462		$	1,897		$	1,897		$	3,855		$	2,462		$	2,462
Provision for off-balance sheet credit losses		982			377			565			121			1,393			475

Ending balance	$	3,444		$	2,274		$	2,462		$	3,976		$	3,855		$	2,937


Total reserve for credit losses	$	77,166		$	70,171		$	72,757		$	78,976		$	78,192		$	74,929

Total provision for credit losses	$	7,000		$	22,500		$	28,500		$	2,000		$	11,500		$	3,000

Reserve for loan losses to loans held for investment⁽²⁾		1.13	%		1.28	%		1.26	%		1.08	%		1.10	%		1.24	%
Net charge-offs to average loans^{(1) (2)}		0.06	%		0.70	%		0.58	%		0.07	%		0.10	%		0.06	%
Total provision for credit losses to average loans⁽²⁾		0.24	%		0.61	%		0.56	%		0.12	%		0.19	%		0.21	%
Recoveries to total charge-offs		31.49	%		5.74	%		6.95	%		31.38	%		22.84	%		25.81	%
Reserve for off-balance sheet credit losses to off-balance sheet credit commitments		0.15	%		0.13	%		0.14	%		0.13	%		0.14	%		0.14	%
Combined reserves for credit losses to loans held for investment⁽²⁾		1.18	%		1.32	%		1.31	%		1.14	%		1.15	%		1.29	%

Non-performing assets:
Non-accrual loans⁽⁵⁾	$	57,275		$	66,714		$	54,580		$	43,424		$	55,833		$	50,160
OREO⁽⁴⁾		19,079			35,796			34,077			14,426			15,991			32,601
Other repossessed assets		—			579			1,516			—			42			54

Total	$	76,354		$	103,089		$	90,173		$	57,850		$	71,866		$	82,815



Restructured loans	$	9,145		$	24,963		$	25,104		$	11,755		$	10,407		$	12,582

Loans past due 90 days and still accruing⁽³⁾		3,622			3,003			5,467			12,614			3,674			5,941

Reserve as a percent of non-performing loans		1.3x			1.0x			1.3x			1.7x			1.3x			1.4x

Non-performing assets include non-accrual loans and leases and repossessed assets. The table below summarizes our non-accrual loans by type (in thousands):


	September 30, 2012		September 30, 2011		December 31, 2011		March 31, 2013		December 31, 2012		March 31, 2012
Non-accrual loans
Commercial	$	17,653	$	12,674	$	12,913	$	20,814	$	15,373	$	9,485
Construction		19,249		21,288		21,119		—		17,217		20,699
Real estate		20,100		29,167		19,803		22,504		23,066		19,346
Consumer		60		309		313		37		57		293
Leases		213		3,276		432		69		120		337

Total non-accrual loans	$	57,275	$	66,714	$	54,580	$	43,424	$	55,833	$	50,160

The table below summarizes the non-accrual loans as segregated by loan type and type of property securing the credit as of ~~September 30, 2012~~March 31, 2013 (in thousands):


Non-accrual loans:
Commercial
Lines of credit secured by the following:
Various single family residences and notes receivable	$	3,332	$	2,936
Oil and gas properties				3,498
Assets of the borrowers		12,993		13,143
Other		1,328		1,237

Total commercial		17,653		20,814
Construction
Secured by:
Unimproved land and/or undeveloped residential lots		19,249

Total construction		19,249
Real estate
Secured by:
Commercial property		6,808		9,170
Unimproved land and/or undeveloped residential lots		8,023		9,099
Single family residences		2,174		2,105
Other		3,095		2,130

Total real estate		20,100		22,504
Consumer		60		37
Leases (commercial leases primarily secured by assets of the lessor)		213		69

Total non-accrual loans	$	57,275	$	43,424

Generally, we place loans on non-accrual when there is a clear indication that the borrower’s cash flow may not be sufficient to meet payments as they become due, which is generally when a loan is 90 days past due. When a loan is placed on non-accrual status, all previously accrued and unpaid interest is reversed. Interest income is subsequently recognized on a cash basis as long as the remaining unpaid principal amount of the loan is deemed to be fully collectible. If collectability is questionable, then cash payments are applied to principal. As of ~~September 30, 2012, $17.8 million~~March 31, 2013, none of our non-accrual loans were earning on a cash basis.

A loan is considered impaired when, based on current information and events, it is probable that we will be unable to collect all amounts due (both principal and interest) according to the terms of the original loan agreement. All loans classified as TDRs are also considered impaired. Reserves on impaired loans are measured based on the present value of the expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate or the fair value of the underlying collateral.

At ~~September 30, 2012,~~March 31, 2013, we had ~~$3.6~~$12.6 million in loans past due 90 days and still accruing interest. At ~~September 30, 2012, $2.7~~March 31, 2013, $4.4 million of the loans past due 90 days and still accruing are premium finance loans. These loans are primarily secured by obligations of insurance carriers to refund premiums on cancelled insurance policies. The refund of premiums from the insurance carriers can take 180 days or longer from the cancellation date. The refund of premiums from the insurance carriers can take 180 days or longer from the cancellation date. In addition, the total includes a $7.9 million loan that is expected to pay off during the second quarter of 2013.

Restructured loans are loans on which, due to the borrower’s financial difficulties, we have granted a concession that we would not otherwise consider. This may include a transfer of real estate or other assets from the borrower, a modification of loan terms, or a combination of the two. Modifications of terms that could potentially qualify as a restructuring include reduction of contractual interest rate, extension of the maturity date at a contractual interest rate lower than the current rate for new debt with similar risk, or a reduction of the face amount of debt, or forgiveness of either principal or accrued interest. As of ~~September 30, 2012,~~March 31, 2013, we have ~~$9.1~~$11.8 million in loans considered restructured that are not on nonaccrual. Of the nonaccrual loans at ~~September 30, 2012, $14.7~~March 31, 2013, $16.9 million met the criteria for restructured. A loan continues to qualify as restructured until a consistent payment history or change in borrower’s financial condition has been evidenced, generally no less than twelve months. A loan is placed back on accrual status when both principal and interest are current and it is probable that we will be able to collect all amounts due (both principal and interest) according to the terms of the loan agreement.

Potential problem loans consist of loans that are performing in accordance with contractual terms but for which we have concerns about the borrower’s ability to comply with repayment terms because of the borrower’s potential financial difficulties. We monitor these loans closely and review their performance on a regular basis. At ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2013 and March 31, 2012, we ~~did not have any potential problem loans compared to $18.1~~had $21.1 million ~~at September 30, 2011,~~and $26.3 million, respectively, in loans of this type which were not included in either non-accrual or 90 days past due categories.

The table below presents a summary of the activity related to OREO (in thousands):


	Three months ended September 30,						Nine months ended September 30,						Three months ended March 31,
	2012			2011			2012			2011			2013			2012
Beginning balance	$	27,882		$	27,285		$	34,077		$	42,261		$	15,991		$	34,077
Additions		—			12,661			3,397			19,254			—			2,522
Sales		(8,739	)		(2,488	)		(12,467	)		(20,012	)		(1,494	)		(1,257	)
Valuation allowance for OREO		—			(1,601	)		(3,556	)		(3,522	)		—			(856	)
Direct write-downs		(64	)		(61	)		(2,372	)		(2,185	)		(71	)		(1,885	)

Ending balance	$	19,079		$	35,796		$	19,079		$	35,796		$	14,426		$	32,601

The following table summarizes the assets held in OREO at ~~September 30, 2012~~March 31, 2013 (in thousands):


Unimproved commercial real estate lots and land	$	4,594	$	3,116
Undeveloped land and residential lots		10,421		7,364
Multifamily lots and land		501		501
Single family residences		2,453		2,453
Other		1,110		992

Total OREO	$	19,079	$	14,426

When foreclosure occurs, fair value, which is generally based on appraised values, may result in partial charge-off of a loan upon taking property, and so long as property is retained, subsequent reductions in appraised values will result in valuation adjustment taken as non-interest expense. In addition, if the decline in value is believed to be permanent and not just driven by market conditions, a direct write-down to the OREO balance may be taken. We generally pursue sales of OREO when conditions warrant, but we may choose to hold certain properties for a longer term, which can result in additional exposure related to the appraised values during that holding period. During the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2013 and March 31, 2012, ~~and September 30, 2011,~~ we recorded ~~$5.9 million~~$71,000 and ~~$5.7~~$2.7 million in valuation expense, respectively. Of the ~~$5.9 million~~$71,000 recorded for the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September 30, 2012, $3.6 million related to increases to the valuation allowance and $2.3 million~~March 31, 2013, $71,000 related to direct write-downs.

In general terms, liquidity is a measurement of our ability to meet our cash needs. Our objective in managing our liquidity is to maintain our ability to meet loan commitments, purchase securities or repay deposits and other liabilities in accordance with their terms, without an adverse impact on our current or future earnings. Our liquidity strategy is guided by policies, which are formulated and monitored by our senior management and our Balance Sheet Management Committee (“BSMC”), and which take into account the demonstrated marketability of assets, the sources and stability of funding and the level of unfunded commitments. We regularly evaluate all of our various funding sources with an emphasis on accessibility, stability, reliability and cost-effectiveness. For the year ended December 31, ~~2011~~2012 and for ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September 30, 2012,~~March 31, 2013, our principal source of funding has been our customer deposits, supplemented by our short-term and long-term borrowings, primarily from federal funds purchased and Federal Home Loan Bank (“FHLB”) borrowings.

Our liquidity needs for support of growth in loans held for investment have ~~typically~~ been fulfilled through growth in our core customer ~~deposits and supplemented with brokered deposits and borrowings as needed.~~deposits. Our goal is to obtain as much of our funding for loans held for investment and other earnings assets as possible from deposits of these core customers. These deposits are generated principally through development of long-term relationships with customers and stockholders, ~~and our retail network, which is mainly through BankDirect.~~with a significant focus on treasury management products. In addition to deposits from our core customers, we ~~also~~ have access to incremental deposits through brokered retail certificates of deposit, or CDs. These CDs are generally of short maturities, 30 to 90 days, and are used to supplement temporary differences in the growth in loans, including growth in loans held for sale or other specific categories of loans, compared to customer deposits. The following table summarizes our period-end and average year-to-date core customer deposits and brokered deposits (in millions):


	September 30,			September 30,			December 31,
	2012			2011			2011			March 31, 2013			March 31, 2012			December 31, 2012

Deposits from core customers	$	6,649.9		$	5,486.5		$	5,391.1		$	7,745.8		$	5,802.5		$	7,440.8
Deposits from core customers as a percent of total deposits		99.0	%		100.0	%		97.0	%		100.0	%		95.7	%		100.0	%
Brokered deposits	$	67.7		$	—		$	165.1		$	—		$	261.00		$	—
Brokered deposits as a percent of total deposits		1.0	%		0.0	%		3.0	%		0.0	%		4.3	%		0.0	%

Average deposits from core customers⁽¹⁾	$	6,113.7		$	5,272.8		$	5,344.2		$	7,518.7		$	5,648.6		$	6,336.0
Average deposits from core customers as a percent of total quarterly average deposits⁽¹⁾		97.8	%		100.0	%		99.7	%		100.0	%		96.8	%		98.3	%

Average brokered deposits⁽¹⁾	$	137.3		$	—		$	17.3		$	—		$	186.70		$	108.0
Average brokered deposits as a percent of total quarterly average deposits⁽¹⁾		2.2	%		0.0	%		0.3	%		0.0	%		3.2	%		1.7	%

We have access to, and have periodically utilized, sources of brokered deposits of not less than an additional ~~$3.4~~$3.5 billion. Customer deposits (total deposits minus brokered CDs) increased by ~~$1.2~~$1.9 billion from ~~September 30, 2011~~March 31, 2012 and increased ~~$1.3 billion~~by $305.0 million from December 31, ~~2011.~~2012.

Additionally, we have borrowing sources available to supplement deposits and meet our funding needs. Such borrowings are generally used to fund our loans held for sale, due to their liquidity, short duration and interest spreads available. These borrowing sources typically include federal funds purchased from our downstream correspondent bank relationships (which consist of banks that are smaller than our bank) and from our upstream correspondent bank relationships (which consist of banks that are larger than our bank), customer repurchase agreements, treasury, tax and loan notes, and advances from the FHLB and the Federal Reserve. The following table summarizes our borrowings as of ~~September 30, 2012~~March 31, 2013 (in thousands):


Federal funds purchased	$	473,330	$	452,998
Customer repurchase agreements		22,788		35,095
FHLB borrowings		1,550,051		450,041
Subordinated notes		111,000		111,000
Trust preferred subordinated debentures		113,406		113,406

Total borrowings	$	2,270,575	$	1,162,540

Maximum outstanding at any month-end during the year	$	2,270,575	$	1,703,771

The following table summarizes our other borrowing capacities in excess of balances outstanding at ~~September 30, 2012~~March 31, 2013 (in thousands):


FHLB borrowing capacity relating to loans	$	747,549	$	908,198
FHLB borrowing capacity relating to securities		36,467		5,850

Total FHLB borrowing capacity	$	784,016	$	914,048

Unused federal funds lines available from commercial banks	$	511,500	$	575,000

Our equity capital averaged ~~$679.2~~$854.3 million for the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September 30, 2012,~~March 31, 2013, as compared to ~~$557.8~~$627.6 million for the same period in ~~2011. This increase reflects our retention of net earnings during this period.~~2012. We have not paid any cash dividends on our common stock since we commenced operations and have no plans to do so in the near future.

Our capital ratios remain above the levels required to be well capitalized and have been enhanced with the additional capital raised since 2008 and will allow us to grow organically with the addition of loan and deposit relationships.

On March 27, 2012 we entered into a loan agreement which provides for a non-revolving amortizing line of credit up to $50 million that matures on March 27, 2014. ~~This~~At December 31, 2012, we had $35.0 million of unused capacity on this line. During the first quarter of 2013, we modified the line of credit to increase the capacity to $50.0 million. The loan proceeds may be used for general corporate purposes including funding regulatory capital infusions into the Bank. The loan agreement ~~was paid in full in August 2012.~~contains customary financial covenants and restrictions. At March 31, 2013, no borrowings were outstanding.

During the second quarter of 2012, we filed ~~an S-3~~a Registration Statement on Form S-3 with the SEC which was effective June 25, 2012. The registration statement covers issuances of up to $250.0 million of debt or equity securities. On August 1, 2012 we completed a sale of 2.3 million shares of our common stock in a public offering. Net proceeds from the sale totaled $87.0 million. The additional equity ~~is being~~was used for general corporate purposes, including retirement of $15.0 million of debt discussed above and additional capital to support continued loan growth at our bank.

On September 21, 2012, we issued $111.0 million of subordinated notes. The notes mature in September 2042 and bear interest at a rate of 6.50% per annum, payable quarterly. The proceeds ~~may be~~were used for general corporate purposes including funding regulatory capital infusions into the Bank. The loan agreement contains customary financial covenants and restrictions.

During the fourth quarter of 2012, we filed a Registration Statement on Form S-3 with the SEC which was effective October 25, 2012. The registration statement covers issuances of up to $250.0 million of debt or equity securities. On March 28, 2013 we completed a sale of 6.0 million shares of our preferred stock in a public offering. Net proceeds from the sale totaled $145.1 million. The additional equity is being used for general corporate purposes, including funding regulatory capital infusions into the Bank.

The following table presents significant fixed and determinable contractual obligations to third parties by payment date. Payments for borrowings do not include interest. Payments related to leases are based on actual payments specified in the underlying contracts. As of ~~September 30, 2012,~~March 31, 2013, our significant fixed and determinable contractual obligations to third parties were as follows (in thousands):


	Within One Year		After One but Within Three Years		After Three but Within Five Years		After Five Years		Total		Within One Year		After One but Within Three Years		After Three but Within Five Years		After Five Years		Total
Deposits without a stated maturity⁽¹⁾	$	5,815,823	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	5,815,823	$	6,976,949	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	6,976,949
Time deposits⁽¹⁾		822,415		63,150		16,101		90		901,756		696,663		69,595		2,553		71		768,882
Federal funds purchased⁽¹⁾		473,330		—		—		—		473,330		452,998		—		—		—		452,998
Customer repurchase agreements⁽¹⁾		22,788		—		—		—		22,788		35,095		—		—		—		35,095
FHLB borrowings⁽¹⁾		1,550,000		—		51		—		1,550,051		450,000		—		41		—		450,041
Operating lease obligations^{(1) (2)}		9,951		10,089		28,134		40,022		88,196		10,671		20,953		19,855		35,928		87,407
Subordinated notes⁽¹⁾		—		—		—		111,000		111,000		—		—		—		111,000		111,000
Trust preferred subordinated debentures⁽¹⁾		—		—		—		113,406		113,406		—		—		—		113,406		113,406

Total contractual obligations	$	8,694,307	$	73,239	$	44,286	$	264,518	$	9,076,350	$	8,622,376	$	90,548	$	22,449	$	260,405	$	8,995,778

SEC guidance requires disclosure of “critical accounting policies.” The SEC defines “critical accounting policies” as those that are most important to the presentation of a company’s financial condition and results, and require management’s most difficult, subjective or complex judgments, often as a result of the need to make estimates about the effect of matters that are inherently uncertain.

We follow financial accounting and reporting policies that are in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. The more significant of these policies are summarized in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements. Not all these significant accounting policies require management to make difficult, subjective or complex judgments. However, the policy noted below could be deemed to meet the SEC’s definition of critical accounting policies.

Management considers the policies related to the allowance for loan losses as the most critical to the financial statement presentation. The total allowance for loan losses includes activity related to allowances calculated in accordance with Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 310,Receivables, and ASC 450,Contingencies. The allowance for loan losses is established through a provision for loan losses charged to current earnings. The amount maintained in the allowance reflects management’s continuing evaluation of the loan losses inherent in the loan portfolio. The allowance for loan losses is comprised of specific reserves assigned to certain classified loans and general reserves. Factors contributing to the determination of specific reserves include the credit-worthiness of the borrower, and more specifically, changes in the expected future receipt of principal and interest payments and/or in the value of pledged collateral. A reserve is recorded when the carrying amount of the loan exceeds the discounted estimated cash flows using the loan’s initial effective interest rate or the fair value of the collateral for certain collateral dependent loans. For purposes of determining the general reserve, the portfolio is segregated by product types in order to recognize differing risk profiles among categories, and then further segregated by credit grades. See “Summary of Loan Loss Experience” for further discussion of the risk factors considered by management in establishing the allowance for loan losses.

Market risk is a broad term for the risk of economic loss due to adverse changes in the fair value of a financial instrument. These changes may be the result of various factors, including interest rates, foreign exchange rates, commodity prices, or equity prices. Additionally, the financial instruments subject to market risk can be classified either as held for trading purposes or held for other than trading.

We are subject to market risk primarily through the effect of changes in interest rates on our portfolio of assets held for purposes other than trading. The effect of other changes, such as foreign exchange rates, commodity prices, and/or equity prices do not pose significant market risk to us.

The responsibility for managing market risk rests with the BSMC, which operates under policy guidelines established by our board of directors. The negative acceptable variation in net interest revenue due to a 200 basis point increase or decrease in interest rates is generally limited by these guidelines to +/- 5%. These guidelines also establish maximum levels for short-term borrowings, short-term assets and public and brokered deposits. They also establish minimum levels for unpledged assets, among other things. Compliance with these guidelines is the ongoing responsibility of the BSMC, with exceptions reported to our board of directors on a quarterly basis.

Our interest rate sensitivity is illustrated in the following table. The table reflects rate-sensitive positions as of ~~September 30, 2012,~~March 31, 2013, and is not necessarily indicative of positions on other dates. The balances of interest rate sensitive assets and liabilities are presented in the periods in which they next reprice to market rates or mature and are aggregated to show the interest rate sensitivity gap. The mismatch between repricings or maturities within a time period is commonly referred to as the “gap” for that period. A positive gap (asset sensitive), where interest rate sensitive assets exceed interest rate sensitive liabilities, generally will result in the net interest margin increasing in a rising rate environment and decreasing in a falling rate environment. A negative gap (liability sensitive) will generally have the opposite results on the net interest margin. To reflect anticipated prepayments, certain asset and liability categories are shown in the table using estimated cash flows rather than contractual cash flows. The Company employs interest rate floors in certain variable rate loans to enhance the yield on those loans at times when market interest rates are extraordinarily low. The degree of asset sensitivity, spreads on loans and net interest margin may be reduced until rates increase by an amount sufficient to eliminate the effects of floors. The adverse effect of floors as market rates increase may also be offset by the positive gap, the extent to which rates on deposits and other funding sources lag increasing market rates and changes in composition of funding.


	0-3 mo Balance		4-12 mo Balance		1-3 yr Balance		3+ yr Balance			Total Balance		0-3 mo Balance		4-12 mo Balance		1-3 yr Balance		3+ yr Balance			Total Balance

Assets:
Securities⁽¹⁾	$	21,614	$	33,806	$	28,475	$	23,393		$	107,288	$	25,032	$	21,368	$	24,054	$	17,073		$	87,527

Total variable loans		8,225,196		16,883		7,034		8,406			8,257,519		8,291,208		17,275		439		315			8,309,237
Total fixed loans		594,793		289,787		171,519		92,254			1,148,353		621,182		301,625		178,652		127,957			1,229,416

Total loans⁽²⁾		8,819,989		306,670		178,553		100,660			9,405,872		8,912,390		318,900		179,091		128,272			9,538,653

Total interest sensitive assets	$	8,841,603	$	340,476	$	207,028	$	124,053		$	9,513,160	$	8,937,422	$	340,268	$	203,145	$	145,345		$	9,626,180


Liabilities:
Interest bearing customer deposits	$	4,133,440	$	—	$	—	$	—		$	4,133,440	$	4,726,822	$	—	$	—	$	—		$	4,726,822
CDs & IRAs		150,967		171,884		63,150		16,191			402,192		141,274		177,071		69,595		2,623			390,563
Wholesale deposits		67,668		—		—		—			67,668

Total interest bearing deposits		4,352,075		171,884		63,150		16,191			4,603,300		4,868,096		177,071		69,595		2,623			5,117,385

Repurchase agreements, Federal funds purchased, FHLB borrowings		2,046,118		—		51		—			2,046,169		938,093		—		41		—			938,134
Subordinated notes		—		—		—		111,000			111,000		—		—		—		111,000			111,000
Trust preferred subordinated debentures		—		—		—		113,406			113,406		—		—		—		113,406			113,406

Total borrowings		2,046,118		—		51		224,406			2,270,575		938,093		—		41		224,406			1,162,540

Total interest sensitive liabilities	$	6,398,193	$	171,884	$	63,201	$	240,597		$	6,873,875	$	5,806,189	$	177,071	$	69,636	$	227,029		$	6,279,925


GAP	$	2,443,410	$	168,592	$	143,827	$	(116,544	)	$	—	$	3,131,233	$	163,197	$	133,509	$	(81,684	)	$	—
Cumulative GAP		2,443,410		2,612,002		2,755,829		2,639,285			2,639,285		3,131,233		3,294,430		3,427,939		3,346,255			3,346,255

Demand deposits										$	2,114,279										$	2,628,446
Stockholders’ equity											802,406											1,013,195

Total										$	2,916,685										$	3,641,641

The table above sets forth the balances as of ~~September 30, 2012~~March 31, 2013 for interest bearing assets, interest bearing liabilities, and the total of non-interest bearing deposits and stockholders’ equity. While a gap interest table is useful in analyzing interest rate sensitivity, an interest rate sensitivity simulation provides a better illustration of the sensitivity of earnings to changes in interest rates. Earnings are also affected by the effects of changing interest rates on the value of funding derived from demand deposits and stockholders’ equity. We perform a sensitivity analysis to identify interest rate risk exposure on net interest income. We quantify and measure interest rate risk exposure using a model to dynamically simulate the effect of changes in net interest income relative to changes in interest rates and account balances over the next twelve months based on three interest rate scenarios. These are a “most likely” rate scenario and two “shock test” scenarios.

The “most likely” rate scenario is based on the consensus forecast of future interest rates published by independent sources. These forecasts incorporate future spot rates and relevant spreads of instruments that are actively traded in the open market. The Federal Reserve’s Federal Funds target affects short-term borrowing; the prime lending rate and the LIBOR are the basis for most of our variable-rate loan pricing. The 10-year mortgage rate is also monitored because of its effect on prepayment speeds for mortgage-backed securities. These are our primary interest rate exposures. We are currently not using derivatives to manage our interest rate exposure.

The two “shock test” scenarios assume a sustained parallel 200 basis point increase or decrease, respectively, in interest rates. As short-term rates continued to fall during 2009 and remained low through 2012, we could not assume interest rate decreases of any amount as the results of the decreasing rates scenario would not be meaningful. We will continue to evaluate these scenarios as interest rates change, until short-term rates rise above 3.0%.

Our interest rate risk exposure model incorporates assumptions regarding the level of interest rate or balance changes on indeterminable maturity deposits (demand deposits, interest bearing transaction accounts and savings accounts) for a given level of market rate changes. These assumptions have been developed through a combination of historical analysis and future expected pricing behavior. Changes in prepayment behavior of mortgage-backed securities, residential and commercial mortgage loans in each rate environment are captured using industry estimates of prepayment speeds for various coupon segments of the portfolio. The impact of planned growth and new business activities is factored into the simulation model. This modeling indicated interest rate sensitivity as follows (in thousands):

The simulations used to manage market risk are based on numerous assumptions regarding the effect of changes in interest rates on the timing and extent of repricing characteristics, future cash flows, and customer behavior. These assumptions are inherently uncertain and, as a result, the model cannot precisely estimate net interest income or precisely predict the impact of higher or lower interest rates on net interest income. Actual results will differ from simulated results due to timing, magnitude and frequency of interest rate changes as well as changes in market conditions and management strategies, among other factors.

Our management, including our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, have evaluated our disclosure controls and procedures as of ~~September 30, 2012,~~March 31, 2013, and concluded that those disclosure controls and procedures are effective. There have been no changes in our internal controls or in other factors known to us that could materially affect these controls subsequent to their evaluation, nor any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses. While we believe that our existing disclosure controls and procedures have been effective to accomplish these objectives, we intend to continue to examine, refine and formalize our disclosure controls and procedures and to monitor ongoing developments in this area.

We are aggressively defending against a $65.4 million jury verdict that was rendered in August 2011, in rural southeastern Oklahoma. Post-trial motions were denied without comment in early July 2012, and an appeal has been filed in the Oklahoma Supreme Court.

The Oklahoma case was filed in May 2010 by one of the guarantors of a defaulted loan to an auto dealership in Hugo, Oklahoma, after we already had filed suit in Texas against the debtor and the three co-guarantors to recover the debt, and despite a forum selection clause in the guaranty requiring that any lawsuits be brought in Texas. The guarantor conceded he had signed the guaranty and that the guaranty was valid, but complained that he later had been defrauded because we had failed to notify him about on-going fraud at the dealership. We disputed that we had any such duty to him as guarantor under Oklahoma law, particularly since the guaranty expressly disclaimed such a duty and since he was a co-owner and salaried employee of the dealership. We repeatedly objected to the case proceeding in Oklahoma in view of the clause requiring any lawsuit to be brought in Texas, but these objections were rejected. We then obtained an injunction from the Texas court against the guarantor proceeding with the Oklahoma suit, but the guarantor nevertheless continued to trial in the Oklahoma suit in violation of that injunction.

We have been advised by counsel that we have numerous grounds to reverse the Oklahoma verdict entirely or substantially reduce the amount, such as the guarantor’s pursuit of the Oklahoma case in violation of the forum selection clause in the guaranty and the Texas court’s injunction, the absence of any alleged contractual or other legal duty to the guarantor, and the lack of proof of actual economic damages. In addition, we continued to pursue the Texas lawsuit over the guaranty, and on April 18, 2012, we received summary judgment ordering the guarantor to pay us approximately $7 million on the debt, which could offset a portion of any arguable liability in the Oklahoma case.

~~There has not~~Except as set forth below, there have been ~~any~~no material change in the risk factors previously disclosed in the Company’s ~~2011~~2012 Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, ~~2011. Additionally,~~2012. Additional risk factors relating to the ~~following risks associated with our industry were included~~Subordinated Notes issued September 21, 2012 previously disclosed in ~~our prospectus supplement~~the Prospectus Supplement dated September 18, ~~2012.~~2012 and to the Preferred Stock offering completed on March 28, 2013 previously disclosed in the Prospectus Supplement dated March 21, 2013 and the 8-K filed on March 22, 2013 are incorporated by reference.

~~The earnings~~Our growth plans are dependent on the availability of capital and funding. Our historical ability to raise capital through the sale of common stock and debt securities may become limited by market conditions beyond our control, as has been evidenced with the economic downturn and issues affecting the financial services industry. Due to changes in regulation, trust preferred securities are no longer viable as a source of long-term debt capital, and treatment of trust preferred as capital may be changed by regulation prior to the maturity of the trust preferred. Change in capital treatment of trust preferred may require the Company to issue securities at times and with maturity, conditions, and rates that are disadvantageous. Pricing of capital, in terms of interest or dividend requirements or dilutive impact on earnings available to shareholders, has increased dramatically, and an increase in costs of capital and availability of funding can have a direct impact on operating performance and the ability to achieve growth objectives. Costs of funding could also increase dramatically and affect our growth objectives, as well as our financial performance. Additionally, the FDIC’s guarantee on non-interest bearing deposits was not extended past December 31, 2012; as a result, we could be adversely affected in our ability to attract and maintain non-interest bearing deposits as a source of cost-effective funding. Adverse changes in operating performance or financial condition or changes in statutory or regulatory requirements could make raising additional capital difficult or extremely expensive. Regulators may change capital and liquidity requirements including previous interpretations of practices related to risk weights that could require an increase to the allocation of capital to assets held by the Bank, and they could require banks to make retroactive adjustment to financial statements to reflect such changes. Changes in risk weights applicable to assets held by the Bank, if applied retroactively could cause our Bank to report historical deficiencies relative to well-capitalized or minimum capital standards and cause us to raise additional capital or reduce asset balances to maintain minimum and well-capitalized levels of regulatory capital. Balances shown as “loans held for sale” are comprised of ownership interests in mortgage loans to which we have historically assigned a risk weight to mortgage loans of 50% (or 20% for loans guaranteed by the FHA or VA). The Company will pursue all available remedies to any determination by the OCC that the mortgage loan interests owned should be assigned to the 100% risk weight category associated with loans to mortgage companies that are ~~significantly affected~~secured by ~~general business~~a pledge of mortgage loans as collateral. There can be no assurances that the Company will be successful in challenging any such determination, and ~~economic conditions.~~ Asthe OCC could require a ~~financial services company, our operations and profitability are impacted by general business and economic conditions~~change in the ~~United States and abroad. These conditions include short-term and long-term interest rates, inflation, money supply, economic conditions~~applicable risk weight on these assets retroactively. It is not certain that any change that the Company may make in ~~foreign markets, political issues, legislative and regulatory changes, fluctuation in both debt and equity capital markets, broad trends in industry and finance and~~ the strength of the U.S. economy and the local economies in which we operate, all of which are beyond our control. Continued weakness or further deterioration in economic conditions could result in decreases in loan collateral values and increases in loan delinquencies, non-performing assets and losses on loans and other real estate acquired through foreclosure of loans. Industry conditions, competition and the performancestructure of our ~~bank could also~~program would result in a ~~decrease~~return to historical risk weights applied to the ownership interests in ~~demand for our products and services, among other things, any of which could have a material adverse impact on our results of operations~~mortgage assets or that such change would not increase operating and financial ~~condition.~~

~~We are subject~~risks related to ~~extensive government regulation and supervision.~~ ~~We are subject to extensive federal and state regulation and supervision. Banking regulations are primarily intended to protect depositors’ funds, federal deposit insurance funds~~this business and the ~~banking system~~assets generated by it.

During the first quarter of 2013, we downstreamed an additional $125 million to the Bank and applied a 100% risk weight to the loans held for sale portfolio. We believe we have at all times applied the appropriate risk weights to the ownership interests in mortgage loans owned by us and are prepared to defend that position. Based on the facts and circumstances related to the structure of our program, we believe it supports a 50% (or 20% for

FHA/VA) risk weighting. We will determine if our business practices could be changed to maintain the risk weights historically applied and if those changes would be consistent with operating and financial risks acceptable to the Bank. Beginning with the reports for March 31, 2013, the risk weight applied to the Company’s ownership in mortgage loans, in the capital ratios included herein and in regulatory filings, will be shown using a 100% risk weight. That presentation, which is being challenged by the Company, is consistent with our understanding of the OCC’s current interpretation of the supplemental call reports instructions issued in early April that require reporting of such assets as ~~a whole, not shareholders or debtholders. Federal regulation is also designed~~loans to ~~cause~~nondepository financial institutions. At March 31, 2013 we had $157 million in the ~~banking system~~parent company and an available line of credit of $50 million to support ~~governmental policies that may not be beneficial to our bank. These regulations affect our lending practices,~~the Bank’s future capital ~~structure, investment practices, accounting, financial reporting, dividend policy, operations~~needs. As is typical in the mortgage business, month-end and ~~growth, among other things. These regulations also impose obligations to maintain appropriate policies, procedures~~quarter-end balances are generally much higher than average balances. The difference between the quarter-end balance and ~~controls, among other things, to detect, prevent and report money laundering and terrorist financing and to verify~~ the ~~identities~~average balance for the first quarter of our customer. Congress and federal regulatory agencies continually review banking laws, regulations and policies for possible changes. Changes to statutes, regulations or regulatory policies, including changes2013 required approximately $22 million in interpretation or implementation of statutes, regulations or policies, could affect us in substantial and unpredictable ways. The changes in regulation and requirements imposed on financial institutions, such as the Dodd-Frank Act and Basel III accords, could subject us to additional costs, impose requirements for additional capital ~~limit~~using the types of financial services and products we may offer and/or increase the ability of non-banks to offer competing financial services and products, among other things. Over a year after the adoption of the Dodd-Frank Act, there are still many related regulations that have not been written, so the effects of those are unknown at this time. In addition, from time to time we receive inquiries from our regulators regarding, among other things, lending practices, reserve methodology, interest rate and operational100% risk management, regulatory and financial accounting practices and policies and related matters. Any change to our practices or policies requested or required by our regulators, or any changes in interpretation of regulatory policy applicable to our businesses, may have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition, credit quality or regulatory capital.

We expend substantial effort and incur costs to improve our systems, controls, accounting, operations, information security, compliance, audit capabilities, staffing and training in order to satisfy regulatory requirements, but the regulatory authorities may determine that such efforts are insufficient. Failure to comply with relevant laws, regulations or policies could result in sanctions by regulatory agencies, civil money penalties and/or reputation damage, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. While we have policies and procedures designed to prevent any such violations, there can be no assurance that such violations will not occur. In addition, the FDIC has imposed higher general and special assessments on deposits based on general industry conditions and as a result of changes in specific programs, and there is no restriction on the amount by which the FDIC may increase deposit assessments in the future. Any increase in FDIC assessments could affect our earnings to a significant degree, and the industry may be subject to additional assessments, fees or taxes.

Furthermore, Sarbanes-Oxley, and the related rules and regulations promulgated by the SEC and Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (“FINRA”) that are applicable to us, have increased the scope, complexity and cost of corporate governance, reporting and disclosure practices. As a result, we have experienced, and may continue to experience, greater compliance costs.weight applied.

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.


Delaware		75-2679109
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification Number)

2000 McKinney Avenue, Suite 700, Dallas, Texas, U.S.A.		75201
(Address of principal executive officers)		(Zip Code)


Part I. Financial Information

Item 1.	Financial Statements
	Consolidated Statements of Income and Other Comprehensive Income - Unaudited	3
	Consolidated Balance Sheets - Unaudited	4
	Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity - Unaudited	5
	Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows - Unaudited	6
	Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements - Unaudited	7
	Financial Summaries - Unaudited	3129

Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	3330

Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk	4541

Item 4.	Controls and Procedures	4844

Part II. Other Information		48

~~Item 1.~~	~~Legal Proceedings~~	48

Item 1A.	Risk Factors	4944

Item 5.	Exhibits	5046

Signatures		5147


September 30, 2012
	Number of Contracts		Pre-Restructuring Outstanding Recorded Investment		Post- Restructuring Outstanding Recorded Investment
Commercial business loans		1	$	802	$	777
Real estate market risk		2		1,726		1,162
Real estate – 1-4 family		1		1,424		1,424

Total new restructured loans in 2012		4	$	3,952	$	3,363

September 30, 2011
	Number of Contracts		Pre-Restructuring Outstanding Recorded Investment		Post- Restructuring Outstanding Recorded Investment
Commercial business loans		3	$	2,140	$	1,984
Construction market risk		1		2,620		1,915
Real estate market risk		9		43,374		37,569
Real estate – 1-4 family		1		1,217		1,349

Total new restructured loans in 2011		14	$	49,351	$	42,817


	Weighted-Average
	Interest Rate Received			Interest Rate Paid
Non-hedging interest rate swaps		4.94	%		2.39	%


Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share			~~40,587,532~~40,781,322


		For the nine months ended September 30, 2012							For the nine months ended September 30, 2011
		Average Balance		Revenue/ Expense⁽¹⁾		Yield/ Rate			Average Balance		Revenue/ Expense⁽¹⁾		Yield/ Rate
Assets
Securities – taxable		$	95,031	$	2,870		4.03	%	$	127,627	$	4,060		4.25	%
Securities – non-taxable⁽²⁾			27,009		1,178		5.83	%		35,321		1,523		5.76	%
Federal funds sold			8,100		7		0.12	%		26,410		36		0.18	%
Deposits in other banks	��		58,272		151		0.35	%		129,669		306		0.32	%
Loans held for sale			2,177,963		66,835		4.10	%		913,410		31,608		4.63	%
Loans			5,976,291		220,060		4.92	%		4,945,863		191,633		5.18	%
Less reserve for loan losses			71,474		—		—			68,115		—		—

Loans, net of reserve			8,082,780		286,895		4.74	%		5,791,158		223,241		5.15	%

Total earning assets			8,271,192		291,101		4.70	%		6,110,186		229,166		5.01	%
Cash and other assets			391,464							312,464

Total assets		$	8,662,656						$	6,422,650


Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity
Transaction deposits		$	688,276	$	585		0.11	%	$	377,998	$	162		0.06	%
Savings deposits			2,708,406		6,375		0.31	%		2,395,100		5,735		0.32	%
Time deposits			566,788		2,327		0.55	%		572,161		4,304		1.01	%
Deposits in foreign branches			428,448		1,045		0.33	%		461,038		1,278		0.37	%

Total interest bearing deposits			4,391,918		10,332		0.31	%		3,806,297		11,479		0.40	%
Other borrowings			1,538,915		2,333		0.20	%		431,661		459		0.14	%
Subordinated notes			4,051		208		6.86	%		—		—		—
Trust preferred subordinated debentures			113,406		2,091		2.46	%		113,406		1,905		2.25	%

Total interest bearing liabilities			6,048,290		14,964		0.33	%		4,351,364		13,843		0.43	%
Demand deposits			1,859,069							1,466,456
Other liabilities			76,145							47,074
Stockholders’ equity			679,152							557,756

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity		$	8,662,656						$	6,422,650



Net interest income				$	276,137						$	215,323

Net interest margin							4.46	%						4.71	%
Net interest spread							4.37	%						4.59	%

Additional information from discontinued operations:
Loans held for sale		$	388						$	433
Borrowed funds			388							433
Net interest income				$	19						$	25
Net interest margin - consolidated							4.46	%						4.71	%


		Anticipated Impact Over the Next Twelve Months as Compared to Most Likely Scenario
		200 bp Increase ~~September 30, 2012~~March 31, 2013

Change in net interest income		$~~55,175~~66,314


Exhibit Number

31.1		Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Exchange Act, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

31.2		Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Exchange Act, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

32.1		Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) of the Exchange Act and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, filed herewith.

32.2		Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) of the Exchange Act and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, filed herewith.

101		The following materials from Texas Capital Bancshares, Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, ~~2012,~~2013, formatted in XBRL (eXtensible Business Reporting Language): (i) Consolidated Statements of Income, (ii) Consolidated Balance Sheets, (iii) Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, and (iv) Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements ***

Large Accelerated Filer

Accelerated Filer

Non-Accelerated Filer

¨ (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Small Reporting Company