Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No x

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the registrant’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practical date.

Common Stock Issued and Outstanding: ~~28,115,248~~56,251,423 shares as of ~~May 1,~~August 2, 2013.

Some of our statements contained in this document, including matters discussed under the caption “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operation” are “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Forward-looking statements relate to future events or our future financial performance and include statements about the competitiveness of the banking industry, potential regulatory obligations, our entrance and expansion into other markets, our other business strategies and other statements that are not historical facts. Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of performance or results. When we use words like “may,” “plan,” “contemplate,” “anticipate,” “believe,” “intend,” “continue,” “expect,” “project,” “predict,” “estimate,” “could,” “should,” “would,” and similar expressions, you should consider them as identifying forward-looking statements, although we may use other phrasing. These forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties and are based on our beliefs and assumptions, and on the information available to us at the time that these disclosures were prepared. These forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties and may not be realized due to a variety of factors, including, but not limited to, the following:

All written or oral forward-looking statements attributable to us are expressly qualified in their entirety by this Cautionary Note. Our actual results may differ significantly from those we discuss in these forward-looking statements. For other factors, risks and uncertainties that could cause our actual results to differ materially from estimates and projections contained in these forward-looking statements, see the “Risk Factors” section of our Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 4, 2013.


(In thousands, except share data)	March 31, 2013			December 31, 2012			June 30, 2013			December 31, 2012
	(Unaudited)						(Unaudited)
Assets
Cash and due from banks	$	95,604		$	101,972		$	75,148		$	101,972
Interest-bearing deposits with other banks		206,753			129,883			97,576			129,883

Cash and cash equivalents		302,357			231,855			172,724			231,855
Federal funds sold		2,850			17,148			2,475			17,148
Investment securities – available-for-sale		724,929			726,223			736,406			726,223
Loans receivable not covered by loss share		2,309,146			2,331,199			2,339,242			2,331,199
Loans receivable covered by FDIC loss share		358,669			384,884			329,802			384,884
Allowance for loan losses		(45,935	)		(50,632	)		(41,450	)		(50,632	)

Loans receivable, net		2,621,880			2,665,451			2,627,594			2,665,451
Bank premises and equipment, net		117,534			113,883			119,737			113,883
Foreclosed assets held for sale not covered by loss share		18,861			20,393			15,985			20,393
Foreclosed assets held for sale covered by FDIC loss share		29,928			31,526			27,073			31,526
FDIC indemnification asset		126,275			139,646			116,071			139,646
Cash value of life insurance		59,185			59,219			59,401			59,219
Accrued interest receivable		14,367			16,305			14,424			16,305
Deferred tax asset, net		40,907			46,998			46,655			46,998
Goodwill		85,681			85,681			85,681			85,681
Core deposit and other intangibles		11,259			12,061			10,457			12,061
Other assets		69,494			75,741			56,654			75,741

Total assets	$	4,225,507		$	4,242,130		$	4,091,337		$	4,242,130

Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity
Deposits:
Demand and non-interest-bearing	$	717,830		$	666,414		$	733,374		$	666,414
Savings and interest-bearing transaction accounts		1,810,957			1,784,047			1,735,280			1,784,047
Time deposits		936,649			1,032,991			856,581			1,032,991

Total deposits		3,465,436			3,483,452			3,325,235			3,483,452
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase		77,194			66,278			73,461			66,278
FHLB borrowed funds		130,369			130,388			130,251			130,388
Accrued interest payable and other liabilities		21,020			17,672			25,787			17,672
Subordinated debentures		3,093			28,867			3,093			28,867

Total liabilities		3,697,112			3,726,657			3,557,827			3,726,657

Stockholders’ equity:
Common stock, par value $0.01; shares authorized 50,000,000; shares issued and outstanding 28,114,297 in 2013 and 28,106,527 in 2012		281			281
Common stock, par value $0.01; shares authorized 100,000,000 in 2013 and 50,000,000 shares in 2012; shares issued and outstanding 56,243,423 in 2013 and 56,213,054 (split adjusted) in 2012								562			281
Capital surplus		416,741			416,354			416,795			416,354
Retained earnings		100,730			86,837			114,172			86,837
Accumulated other comprehensive income		10,643			12,001			1,981			12,001

Total stockholders’ equity		528,395			515,473			533,510			515,473

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	4,225,507		$	4,242,130		$	4,091,337		$	4,242,130


	Three Months Ended March 31,						Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
(In thousands, except per share data)	2013			2012
(In thousands, except per share data⁽¹⁾)							2013			2012			2013			2012
	(Unaudited)						(Unaudited)
Interest income:
Loans	$	44,159		$	38,506		$	44,036		$	40,365		$	88,195		$	78,871
Investment securities
Taxable		2,403			2,860			2,490			3,060			4,893			5,920
Tax-exempt		1,481			1,535			1,467			1,534			2,948			3,069
Deposits – other banks		98			85			86			127			184			212
Federal funds sold		7			2			6			3			13			5

Total interest income		48,148			42,988			48,085			45,089			96,233			88,077

Interest expense:
Interest on deposits		2,485			4,660			2,129			4,164			4,614			8,824
FHLB borrowed funds		1,004			1,160			1,012			1,134			2,016			2,294
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase		80			110			86			111			166			221
Subordinated debentures		230			524			17			521			247			1,045

Total interest expense		3,799			6,454			3,244			5,930			7,043			12,384

Net interest income		44,349			36,534			44,841			39,159			89,190			75,693
Provision for loan losses		—			—			850			1,333			850			1,333

Net interest income after provision for loan losses		44,349			36,534			43,991			37,826			88,340			74,360

Non-interest income:
Service charges on deposit accounts		3,709			3,505			4,088			3,668			7,797			7,173
Other service charges and fees		3,437			3,024			3,479			3,223			6,916			6,247
Mortgage lending income		1,372			904			1,619			1,277			2,991			2,181
Insurance commissions		679			551			444			438			1,123			989
Income from title services		109			88			136			129			245			217
Increase in cash value of life insurance		180			257			218			214			398			471
Dividends from FHLB, FRB, Bankers’ bank & other		175			175			401			175			576			350
Gain on sale of SBA loans		56			—			—			198			56			198
Gain (loss) on sale of premises and equipment, net		15			—			394			359			409			359
Gain (loss) on OREO, net		86			(107	)		441			159			527			52
Gain (loss) on securities, net		—			19			111			(9	)		111			10
FDIC indemnification accretion		(1,992	)		670
FDIC indemnification accretion/amortization, net								(2,283	)		449			(4,275	)		1,119
Other income		1,199			1,017			757			773			1,956			1,790

Total non-interest income		9,025			10,103			9,805			11,053			18,830			21,156

Non-interest expense:
Salaries and employee benefits		12,952			11,386			12,957			11,903			25,909			23,289
Occupancy and equipment		3,594			3,431			3,894			3,552			7,488			6,983
Data processing expense		1,510			1,091			1,231			1,371			2,741			2,462
Other operating expenses		7,807			8,478			7,773			7,598			15,580			16,076

Total non-interest expense		25,863			24,386			25,855			24,424			51,718			48,810

Income before income taxes		27,511			22,251			27,941			24,455			55,452			46,706
Income tax expense		9,963			7,753			10,282			8,965			20,245			16,718

Net income	$	17,548		$	14,498		$	17,659		$	15,490		$	35,207		$	29,988

Basic earnings per common share	$	0.62		$	0.51		$	0.32		$	0.28		$	0.63		$	0.53

Diluted earnings per common share	$	0.62		$	0.51		$	0.31		$	0.27		$	0.62		$	0.53


	Three Months Ended March 31,						Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
(In thousands, except per share data)	2013			2012
(In thousands)							2013			2012			2013			2012
	(unaudited)						(unaudited)
Net income	$	17,548		$	14,498		$	17,659		$	15,490		$	35,207		$	29,988
Net unrealized gain (loss) on available-for-sale securities		(2,235	)		(896	)		(14,142	)		4,417			(16,377	)		3,521
Less: reclassification adjustment for realized (gains) losses included in income		—			(19	)		(111	)		9			(111	)		(10	)

Other comprehensive income (loss), before tax effect		(2,235	)		(915	)		(14,253	)		4,426			(16,488	)		3,511
Tax effect		877			359			5,591			(1,736	)		6,468			(1,377	)

Other comprehensive income (loss)		(1,358	)		(556	)		(8,662	)		2,690			(10,020	)		2,134

Comprehensive income	$	16,190		$	13,942		$	8,997		$	18,180		$	25,187		$	32,122


(In thousands, except share data)	Preferred Stock		Common Stock			Capital Surplus			Retained Earnings			Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income			Total
(In thousands, except share data⁽¹⁾)																		Common Stock			Capital Surplus			Retained Earnings			Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income			Total
Balance at January 1, 2012	$	—	$	283		$	425,649		$	40,130		$	8,004		$	474,066		$	283		$	425,649		$	40,130		$	8,004		$	474,066
Comprehensive income:
Net income		—		—			—			14,498			—			14,498			—			—			29,988			—			29,988
Other comprehensive income (loss)		—		—			—			—			(556	)		(556	)		—			—			—			2,134			2,134
Net issuance of 16,291 shares of common stock from exercise of stock options plus issuance of 4,761 bonus shares of unrestricted common stock		—		—			394			—			—			394
Repurchase of 205,600 shares of common stock		—		(2	)		(5,204	)		—			—			(5,206	)
Net issuance of 73,466 shares of common stock from exercise of stock options plus issuance of 9,522 bonus shares of unrestricted common stock																			—			545			—			—			545
Repurchase of 476,468 shares of common stock																			(2	)		(6,109	)		—			—			(6,111	)
Tax benefit from stock options exercised		—		—			51			—			—			51			—			221			—			—			221
Share-based compensation		—		—			116			—			—			116			—			232			—			—			232
Cash dividends – Common Stock, $0.10 per share		—		—			—			(2,828	)		—			(2,828	)		—			—			(5,640	)		—			(5,640	)

Balances at March 31, 2012 (unaudited)		—		281			421,006			51,800			7,448			480,535
Balances at June 30, 2012 (unaudited)																			281			420,538			64,478			10,138			495,435
Comprehensive income:
Net income		—		—			—			48,524			—			48,524			—			—			33,034			—			33,034
Other comprehensive income (loss)		—		—			—			—			4,553			4,553			—			—			—			1,863			1,863
Net issuance of 161,416 shares of common stock from exercise of stock options		—		2			1,562			—			—			1,564
Repurchase of 249,848 shares of common stock		—		(3	)		(8,340	)		—			—			(8,343	)
Net issuance of 281,948 shares of common stock from exercise of stock options																			2			1,411			—			—			1,413
Repurchase of 434,428 shares of common stock																			(3	)		(7,435	)		—			—			(7,438	)
Tax benefit from stock options exercised		—		—			1,326			—			—			1,326			—			1,156			—			—			1,156
Share-based compensation		—		1			800			—			—			801			1			684			—			—			685
Cash dividends – Common Stock, $0.48 per share		—		—			—			(13,487	)		—			(13,487	)
Cash dividends – Common Stock, $0.19 per share																			—			—			(10,675	)		—			(10,675	)

Balances at December 31, 2012		—		281			416,354			86,837			12,001			515,473			281			416,354			86,837			12,001			515,473
Comprehensive income:
Net income		—		—			—			17,548			—			17,548			—			—			35,207			—			35,207
Other comprehensive income (loss)		—		—			—			—			(1,358	)		(1,358	)		—			—			—			(10,020	)		(10,020	)
Net issuance of 3,603 shares of common stock from exercise of stock options		—		—			126			—			—			126
Net issuance of 11,701 shares of common stock from exercise of stock options																			—			79			—			—			79
Two for one stock split during June 2013																			281			(281	)		—			—			—
Tax benefit from stock options exercised		—		—			24			—			—			24			—			48			—			—			48
Share-based compensation		—		—			237			—			—			237			—			595			—			—			595
Cash dividends – Common Stock, $0.13 per share		—		—			—			(3,655	)		—			(3,655	)
Cash dividends – Common Stock, $0.14 per share																			—			—			(7,872	)		—			(7,872	)

Balances at March 31, 2013 (unaudited)	$	—	$	281		$	416,741		$	100,730		$	10,643		$	528,395
Balances at June 30, 2013 (unaudited)																		$	562		$	416,795		$	114,172		$	1,981		$	533,510


	Three Months Ended March 31,						Six Months Ended June 30,
(In thousands)	2013			2012			2013			2012
	(Unaudited)						(Unaudited)
Operating Activities
Net income	$	17,548		$	14,498		$	35,207		$	29,988
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:
Depreciation		1,610			1,453			3,212			2,956
Amortization/(accretion)		365			1,172			290			2,568
Share-based compensation		237			116			595			232
Tax benefits from stock options exercised		(24	)		(51	)		(48	)		(221	)
(Gain) loss on assets		(483	)		88			(1,318	)		(420	)
Provision for loan losses		—			—			850			1,333
Deferred income tax effect		6,968			(224	)		6,811			1,605
Increase in cash value of life insurance		(180	)		(257	)		(398	)		(471	)
Originations of mortgage loans held for sale		(46,476	)		(28,232	)		(66,673	)		(74,377	)
Proceeds from sales of mortgage loans held for sale		46,307			29,530			58,567			68,959
Changes in assets and liabilities:
Accrued interest receivable		1,938			(294	)		1,881			717
Indemnification and other assets		20,836			20,344			46,165			27,637
Accrued interest payable and other liabilities		3,372			(210	)		8,163			(11,476	)

Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities		52,018			37,933			93,304			49,030

Investing Activities
Net (increase) decrease in federal funds sold		14,298			(275	)		14,673			525
Net (increase) decrease in loans net, excluding loans acquired		37,440			72,037			38,923			103,961
Purchases of investment securities – available-for-sale		(76,991	)		(162,878	)		(153,852	)		(254,059	)
Proceeds from maturities of investment securities – available-for-sale		74,495			70,981			123,942			212,375
Proceeds from sale of investment securities – available-for-sale		—			1,051			278			1,243
Proceeds from foreclosed assets held for sale		8,980			3,482			15,042			18,119
Proceeds from sale of SBA loans		592			—			592			3,000
Purchases of premises and equipment, net		(5,246	)		(1,166	)		(8,657	)		(2,330	)
Death benefits received		540			—			540			—
Net cash proceeds received in market acquisitions		—			140,234			—			140,234

Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities		54,108			123,466			31,481			223,068

Financing Activities
Net increase (decrease) in deposits net, excluding deposits acquired		(18,016	)		(2,064	)		(158,217	)		(88,934	)
Net increase (decrease) in securities sold under agreements to repurchase		10,916			10,212			7,183			4,301
Net increase (decrease) in FHLB and other borrowed funds		(19	)		(24	)		(137	)		(2,254	)
Retirement of subordinated debentures		(25,000	)		—			(25,000	)		—
Repurchase of common stock		—			(5,206	)		—			(6,111	)
Proceeds from exercise of stock options		126			394			79			545
Tax benefits from stock options exercised		24			51			48			221
Dividends paid on common stock		(3,655	)		(2,828	)		(7,872	)		(5,640	)

Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities		(35,624	)		535			(183,916	)		(97,872	)

Net change in cash and cash equivalents		70,502			161,934			(59,131	)		174,226
Cash and cash equivalents – beginning of year		231,855			184,304			231,855			184,304

Cash and cash equivalents – end of period	$	302,357		$	346,238		$	172,724		$	358,530

Home BancShares, Inc. (the “Company” or “HBI”) is a bank holding company headquartered in Conway, Arkansas. The Company is primarily engaged in providing a full range of banking services to individual and corporate customers through its wholly owned community bank subsidiary – Centennial Bank (the “Bank”). The Bank has locations in Central Arkansas, North Central Arkansas, Southern Arkansas, the Florida Keys, Central Florida, Southwestern Florida, the Florida Panhandle and South Alabama. The Company is subject to competition from other financial institutions. The Company also is subject to the regulation of certain federal and state agencies and undergoes periodic examinations by those regulatory authorities.

Operating segments are components of an enterprise about which separate financial information is available that is evaluated regularly by the chief operating decision maker in deciding how to allocate resources and in assessing performance. The Bank is the only significant subsidiary upon which management makes decisions regarding how to allocate resources and assess performance. Each of the branches of the Bank provide a group of similar community banking services, including such products and services as commercial, real estate and consumer loans, time deposits, checking and savings accounts. The individual bank branches have similar operating and economic characteristics. While the chief decision maker monitors the revenue streams of the various products, services and branch locations, operations are managed and financial performance is evaluated on a Company-wide basis. Accordingly, all of the community banking services and branch locations are considered by management to be aggregated into one reportable operating segment, community banking.

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Material estimates that are particularly susceptible to significant change relate to the determination of the allowance for loan losses, the valuation of investment securities, the valuation of foreclosed assets, the valuations of assets acquired and liabilities assumed in business combinations, covered loans and the related indemnification asset. In connection with the determination of the allowance for loan losses and the valuation of foreclosed assets, management obtains independent appraisals for significant properties.

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of HBI and its subsidiaries. Significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

Various items within the accompanying consolidated financial statements for previous periods have been reclassified to provide more comparative information. These reclassifications had no effect on net earnings or stockholders’ equity.

The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements as of ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2013 and 2012 have been prepared in condensed format, and therefore do not include all of the information and footnotes required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for complete financial statements.

The information furnished in these interim statements reflects all adjustments, which are, in the opinion of management, necessary for a fair statement of the results for each respective period presented. Such adjustments are of a normal recurring nature. The results of operations in the interim statements are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for any other quarter or for the full year. The interim financial information should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in the Company’s 2012 Form 10-K, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Basic earnings per common share are computed based on the weighted average number of shares outstanding during each ~~year.~~year, which have been restated to reflect the effect of the 2-for-1 stock split during June 2013. Diluted earnings per common share are computed using the weighted average common shares and all potential dilutive common shares outstanding during the period. The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted earnings per common share (EPS) for the following periods:


	Three Months Ended March 31,				Three Months Ended June 30,				Six Months Ended June 30,
	2013		2012		2013		2012		2013		2012
	(In thousands)				(In thousands)
Net income available to common stockholders	$	17,548	$	14,498
Net income					$	17,659	$	15,490	$	35,207	$	29,988
Average shares outstanding		28,111		28,230		56,234		56,190		56,228		56,325
Effect of common stock options		156		181		343		376		327		366

Diluted shares outstanding		28,267		28,411		56,577		56,566		56,555		56,691

Basic earnings per common share	$	0.62	$	0.51	$	0.32	$	0.28	$	0.63	$	0.53
Diluted earnings per common share	$	0.62	$	0.51	$	0.31	$	0.27	$	0.62	$	0.53

On February 16, 2012, Centennial Bank completed the acquisition of operating assets and liabilities of Vision Bank, a Florida state-chartered bank with its principal office located in Panama City, Florida (“Vision”), pursuant to a Purchase and Assumption Agreement (the “Vision Agreement”), dated November 16, 2011, between the Company, Centennial, Park National Corporation, parent company of Vision (“Park”), and Vision. As a result of the acquisition, the Company had an opportunity to increase its deposit base and reduce transaction costs. The Company also reduced costs through economies of scale.

Vision operated 17 banking centers, including eight locations in Baldwin County, Alabama, and nine locations in the Florida Panhandle counties of Bay, Gulf, Okaloosa, Santa Rosa and Walton. Pursuant to the Vision Agreement, Centennial assumed approximately $522.8 million in customer deposits and acquired approximately $355.8 million in performing loans from Vision for the purchase price of approximately $27.9 million. Centennial did not purchase certain Vision performing loans nor any of its non-performing loans or other real estate owned. In addition, pursuant to the Vision Agreement, Park granted Centennial a put option to sell an aggregate of $7.5 million of the purchased loans back to Park at cost for a period of up to six months after the closing date. During 2012, the Company exercised its option to sell back 45 loans totaling approximately $7.5 million. On the closing date, Park made a cash payment to Centennial of approximately $119.5 million.

See Note 2 “Business Combinations” in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012 for an additional discussion of the acquisition of Vision.

On November 2, 2012, Centennial Bank acquired all the deposits and substantially all the assets of Heritage Bank of Florida (“Heritage”) from the FDIC. This transaction did not include any non-performing loans or other real estate owned of Heritage. In connection with the Heritage acquisition, Centennial Bank opted not to enter into a loss-sharing agreement with the FDIC.

Heritage operated three banking offices located in Tampa, Lutz and Wesley Chapel, Florida. Excluding the effects of the purchase accounting adjustments, Centennial Bank acquired approximately $184.6 million in assets plus a cash settlement to balance the transaction, approximately $135.8 million in performing loans excluding loan discounts and approximately $219.5 million of deposits.

See Note 2 “Business Combinations” in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012 for an additional discussion of the acquisition of Heritage.

On December 1, 2012, Home BancShares, Inc. completed the acquisition of all of the issued and outstanding shares of common stock of Premier Bank, a Florida state-chartered bank with its principal office located in Tallahassee, Florida (“Premier”), pursuant to an Asset Purchase Agreement (the “Premier Agreement”) with Premier Bank Holding Company, a Florida corporation and bank holding company (“PBHC”), dated August 14, 2012. The Company has merged Premier with and into the Company’s wholly-owned subsidiary, Centennial Bank, an Arkansas state-chartered bank.

Premier conducted banking business from six locations in the Florida panhandle cities of Tallahassee (five) and Quincy (one). The Company paid a purchase price to PBHC of $1,415,000 for the Premier acquisition.

The acquisition was conducted in accordance with the provisions of Section 363 of the United States Bankruptcy Code (the “Bankruptcy Code”) pursuant to a voluntary petition for relief under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code filed by PBHC with the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Florida (the “Bankruptcy Court”) on August 14, 2012. The sale of Premier by PBHC was subject to certain bidding procedures approved by the Bankruptcy Court. No qualifying competing bids were received. The Bankruptcy Court entered a final order on November 29, 2012 approving the sale of Premier to the Company pursuant to and in accordance with the Premier Agreement.

See Note 2 “Business Combinations” in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012 for an additional discussion of the acquisition of Premier.

~~FDIC-Assisted Acquisitions—Other Matters~~Acquisition Liberty Bancshares, Inc.

~~In an FDIC-assisted acquisition, we may acquire certain assets and assume certain liabilities~~On June 25, 2013, Home BancShares, Inc. announced the signing of a definitive agreement for Liberty Bancshares, Inc. (“Liberty”), parent company of Liberty Bank of Arkansas, to merge into Home BancShares, Inc. Under the terms of the ~~former institution with~~agreement, shareholders of Liberty will receive $250 million of HBI stock plus $30 million in cash.

Upon completion of the transaction, the combined company will have approximately $7.0 billion in total assets, $5.6 billion in deposits, $4.4 billion in net loans, 151 branches, 186 ATMs, and 1,500 employees across Arkansas, Florida and Southern Alabama. The merger will significantly increase the Company’s deposit market share in Arkansas making it the 2nd largest bank holding company headquartered in Arkansas.

The acquisition is expected to close late in the third quarter or ~~without a loss share agreement with~~early in the ~~Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”). Any~~fourth quarter of 2013 and is subject to Home and Liberty shareholder approval, regulatory ~~agreements or orders that existed for~~approval, and other conditions set forth in the ~~former institution do not apply~~merger agreement. Pursuant to the ~~assuming institution. We, as the assuming institution, are evaluated separately by our regulators and any weaknesses~~terms of the ~~former institution are considered in~~merger agreement, Liberty Bank will merge with and into Centennial Bank immediately after the ~~separate evaluation. Also,~~merger of Liberty with and into Home. Subject to the ~~loss share agreement helps~~receipt of requisite approvals, Home expects to ~~mitigate any weaknesses that may have existed in~~repurchase all of Liberty’s Small Business Lending Fund preferred stock held by the ~~former institution.~~U.S. Treasury shortly after the closing.

The amortized cost and estimated fair value of investment securities were as follows:


	March 31, 2013									June 30, 2013
	Available-for-sale									Available-for-sale
	Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized Gains		Gross Unrealized (Losses)			Estimated Fair Value		Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized Gains		Gross Unrealized (Losses)			Estimated Fair Value
	(In thousands)									(In thousands)
U.S. government-sponsored enterprises	$	188,993	$	2,805	$	(91	)	$	191,707	$	196,050	$	1,741	$	(1,520	)	$	196,271
Mortgage-backed securities		316,149		7,815		(229	)		323,735		304,839		3,975		(2,349	)		306,465
State and political subdivisions		179,352		7,188		(244	)		186,296		194,643		4,211		(2,787	)		196,067
Other securities		22,922		323		(54	)		23,191		37,614		257		(268	)		37,603

Total	$	707,416	$	18,131	$	(618	)	$	724,929	$	733,146	$	10,184	$	(6,924	)	$	736,406


	December 31, 2012
	Available-for-sale
	Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized Gains		Gross Unrealized (Losses)			Estimated Fair Value
	(In thousands)
U.S. government-sponsored enterprises	$	187,811	$	3,011	$	(76	)	$	190,746
Mortgage-backed securities		316,770		8,751		(180	)		325,341
State and political subdivisions		182,515		8,219		(96	)		190,638
Other securities		19,379		138		(19	)		19,498

Total	$	706,475	$	20,119	$	(371	)	$	726,223

Assets, principally investment securities, having a carrying value of approximately ~~$543.0~~$538.4 million and $532.8 million at ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively, were pledged to secure public deposits and for other purposes required or permitted by law. Also, investment securities pledged as collateral for repurchase agreements totaled approximately ~~$77.2~~$73.5 million and $66.3 million at ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively.

The amortized cost and estimated fair value of securities at ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2013, by contractual maturity, are shown below. Expected maturities will differ from contractual maturities because issuers may have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without call or prepayment penalties.


	Available-for-Sale				Available-for-Sale
	Amortized		Estimated		Amortized		Estimated
	Cost		Fair Value		Cost		Fair Value
	(In thousands)				(In thousands)
Due in one year or less	$	215,936	$	218,237	$	227,905	$	227,939
Due after one year through five years		236,905		242,540		257,389		258,735
Due after five years through ten years		224,755		233,273		220,568		221,645
Due after ten years		29,820		30,879		27,284		28,087

Total	$	707,416	$	724,929	$	733,146	$	736,406

For purposes of the maturity tables, mortgage-backed securities, which are not due at a single maturity date, have been allocated over maturity groupings based on anticipated maturities. The mortgage-backed securities may mature earlier than their weighted-average contractual maturities because of principal prepayments.

During the three-month period ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2013, ~~no available-for-sale securities were sold.~~

~~During the three-month period ended March 31, 2012, $1.1 million~~$167,000 in available-for-sale securities were sold. The gross realized gains on these sales totaled approximately ~~$19,000.~~$111,000. The income tax expense/benefit to net security gains and losses was 39.225% of the gross amounts.

During the three-month and six-month periods ended June 30, 2012, $192,000 and $1.2 million, respectively, in available-for-sale securities were sold. The gross realized losses on the sales for the three month period ended June 30, 2012 totaled approximately $9,000. The gross realized gains and losses on the sales for the six month period ended June 30, 2012 totaled approximately $21,000 and $11,000, respectively. The income tax expense/benefit to net security gains and losses was 39.225% of the gross amounts.

The Company evaluates all securities quarterly to determine if any unrealized losses are deemed to be other than temporary. In completing these evaluations the Company follows the requirements of FASB ASC 320,Investments—Debt and Equity Securities. Certain investment securities are valued less than their historical cost. These declines are primarily the result of the rate for these investments yielding less than current market rates. Based on evaluation of available evidence, management believes the declines in fair value for these securities are temporary. The Company does not intend to sell or believe it will be required to sell these investments before recovery of their amortized cost bases, which may be maturity. Should the impairment of any of these securities become other than temporary, the cost basis of the investment will be reduced and the resulting loss recognized in net income in the period the other-than-temporary impairment is identified.

During the ~~three~~six month period ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2013, no securities were deemed to have other-than-temporary impairment besides securities for which impairment was taken in prior periods.

As of ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2013, the Company had approximately ~~$30,000~~$26,000 in unrealized losses, which have been in continuous loss positions for more than twelve months. Excluding impairment write downs taken in prior periods, the Company’s assessments indicated that the cause of the market depreciation was primarily the change in interest rates and not the issuer’s financial condition, or downgrades by rating agencies. In addition, approximately ~~64.0%~~66.1% of the Company’s investment portfolio matures in five years or less. As a result, the Company has the ability and intent to hold such securities until maturity.

The following shows gross unrealized losses and estimated fair value of investment securities available-for-sale, aggregated by investment category and length of time that individual investment securities have been in a continuous loss position as of ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012:


	March 31, 2013															June 30, 2013
	Less Than 12 Months					12 Months or More					Total					Less Than 12 Months					12 Months or More					Total
	Fair		Unrealized			Fair		Unrealized			Fair		Unrealized			Fair		Unrealized			Fair		Unrealized			Fair		Unrealized
	Value		Losses			Value		Losses			Value		Losses			Value		Losses			Value		Losses			Value		Losses
	(In thousands)															(In thousands)
U.S. government-sponsored enterprises	$	15,560	$	(61	)	$	5,204	$	(30	)	$	20,764	$	(91	)	$	89,660	$	(1,494	)	$	5,087	$	(26	)	$	94,747	$	(1,520	)
Mortgage-backed securities		40,985		(229	)		—		—			40,985		(229	)		139,122		(2,349	)		—		—			139,122		(2,349	)
State and political subdivisions		19,819		(244	)		—		—			19,819		(244	)		57,584		(2,787	)		—		—			57,584		(2,787	)
Other securities		6,531		(54	)		—		—			6,531		(54	)		16,104		(268	)		—		—			16,104		(268	)

Total	$	82,895	$	(588	)	$	5,204	$	(30	)	$	88,099	$	(618	)	$	302,470	$	(6,898	)	$	5,087	$	(26	)	$	307,557	$	(6,924	)


	December 31, 2012
	Less Than 12 Months					12 Months or More					Total
	Fair		Unrealized			Fair		Unrealized			Fair		Unrealized
	Value		Losses			Value		Losses			Value		Losses
	(In thousands)
U.S. government-sponsored enterprises	$	26,002	$	(22	)	$	10,477	$	(54	)	$	36,479	$	(76	)
Mortgage-backed securities		36,675		(180	)		—		—			36,675		(180	)
State and political subdivisions		15,797		(96	)		—		—			15,797		(96	)
Other securities		1,973		(19	)		—		—			1,973		(19	)

Total	$	80,447	$	(317	)	$	10,477	$	(54	)	$	90,924	$	(371	)


	December 31, 2012
	Less Than 12 Months					12 Months or More					Total
	Fair		Unrealized			Fair		Unrealized			Fair		Unrealized
	Value		Losses			Value		Losses			Value		Losses
	(In thousands)
U.S. government-sponsored enterprises	$	26,002	$	(22	)	$	10,477	$	(54	)	$	36,479	$	(76	)
Mortgage-backed securities		36,675		(180	)		—		—			36,675		(180	)
State and political subdivisions		15,797		(96	)		—		—			15,797		(96	)
Other securities		1,973		(19	)		—		—			1,973		(19	)

Total	$	80,447	$	(317	)	$	10,477	$	(54	)	$	90,924	$	(371	)

The various categories of loans not covered by loss share are summarized as follows:


	March 31,		December 31,		June 30,		December 31,
	2013		2012		2013		2012
	(In thousands)				(In thousands)
Real estate:
Commercial real estate loans
Non-farm/non-residential	$	1,014,301	$	1,019,039	$	1,003,391	$	1,019,039
Construction/land development		254,673		254,800		281,994		254,800
Agricultural		34,288		32,513		31,119		32,513
Residential real estate loans
Residential 1-4 family		531,698		549,269		528,260		549,269
Multifamily residential		122,998		129,742		120,899		129,742

Total real estate		1,957,958		1,985,363		1,965,663		1,985,363
Consumer		33,823		37,462		32,671		37,462
Commercial and industrial		269,463		256,908		287,351		256,908
Agricultural		16,573		19,825		26,462		19,825
Other		31,329		31,641		27,095		31,641

Loans receivable not covered by loss share	$	2,309,146	$	2,331,199	$	2,339,242	$	2,331,199

During the three ~~-month period~~and six-month periods ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2013, the Company sold $536,000 of the guaranteed portion of an SBA loan, which resulted in a gain of approximately $56,000. ~~The~~During the three and six-month periods ended June 30, 2012, the Company ~~did not sell any~~sold $2.8 million of the guaranteed portions of SBA loans, ~~during the three-month period ended March 31, 2012.~~which resulted in a gain of approximately $198,000.

Mortgage loans held for sale of approximately $20.6 million and $22.0 million at ~~both March 31,~~June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively, are included in residential 1-4 family loans. Mortgage loans held for sale are carried at the lower of cost or fair value, determined using an aggregate basis. Gains and losses resulting from sales of mortgage loans are recognized when the respective loans are sold to investors. Gains and losses are determined by the difference between the selling price and the carrying amount of the loans sold, net of discounts collected or paid. The Company obtains forward commitments to sell mortgage loans to reduce market risk on mortgage loans in the process of origination and mortgage loans held for sale. The forward commitments acquired by the Company for mortgage loans in process of origination are not mandatory forward commitments. These commitments are structured on a best efforts basis; therefore, the Company is not required to substitute another loan or to buy back the commitment if the original loan does not fund. Typically, the Company delivers the mortgage loans within a few days after the loans are funded. These commitments are derivative instruments and their fair values at ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012 were not material.

The Company evaluated loans purchased in conjunction with the acquisition of Vision described in Note 2, Business Combinations, in accordance with the provisions of FASB ASC Topic 310-20,Nonrefundable Fees and Other Costs. None of the purchased non-covered loans were considered impaired at the date of acquisition. The fair value discount is being accreted into interest income over the weighted average life of the loans using a constant yield method.

The Company evaluated loans purchased in conjunction with the acquisitions of Heritage and Premier described in Note 2, Business Combinations, for impairment in accordance with the provisions of FASB ASC Topic 310-30,Loans and Debt Securities Acquired with Deteriorated Credit Quality. These purchased non-covered loans are considered impaired if there is evidence of credit deterioration since origination and if it is probable that not all contractually required payments will be collected.

The Company evaluated loans purchased in conjunction with the 2010 acquisitions under purchase and assumption agreements with the FDIC for impairment in accordance with the provisions of FASB ASC Topic 310-30,Loans and Debt Securities Acquired with Deteriorated Credit Quality. Purchased covered loans are considered impaired if there is evidence of credit deterioration since origination and if it is probable that not all contractually required payments will be collected.

The following table reflects the carrying value of all purchased FDIC covered impaired loans as of ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012 for the Company:


	March 31,		December 31,
	2013		2012		June 30, 2013		December 31, 2012
	(In thousands)				(In thousands)
Real estate:
Commercial real estate loans
Non-farm/non-residential	$	155,345	$	164,723	$	143,922	$	164,723
Construction/land development		58,384		66,713		56,447		66,713
Agricultural		2,256		2,282		1,784		2,282
Residential real estate loans
Residential 1-4 family		120,246		125,625		107,612		125,625
Multifamily residential		9,443		9,567		10,644		9,567

Total real estate		345,674		368,910		320,409		368,910
Consumer		28		39		20		39
Commercial and industrial		11,712		14,668		8,193		14,668
Other		1,255		1,267		1,180		1,267

Loans receivable covered by FDIC loss share (1)	$	358,669	$	384,884	$	329,802	$	384,884

The acquired loans were grouped into pools based on common risk characteristics and were recorded at their estimated fair values, which incorporated estimated credit losses at the acquisition dates. These loan pools are systematically reviewed by the Company to determine material changes in cash flow estimates from those identified at the time of the acquisition. Techniques used in determining risk of loss are similar to the Centennial Bank non-covered loan portfolio, with most focus being placed on those loan pools which include the larger loan relationships and those loan pools which exhibit higher risk characteristics.

The following table presents a summary of changes in the allowance for loan losses for the non-covered and covered loan portfolios for the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2013:


	For Loans Not Covered by Loss Share			For Loans Covered by FDIC Loss Share			Total			For Loans Not Covered by Loss Share			For Loans Covered by FDIC Loss Share			Total
	(In thousands)									(In thousands)
Allowance for loan losses:
Beginning balance	$	45,170		$	5,462		$	50,632		$	45,170		$	5,462		$	50,632
Loans charged off		(3,318	)		(1,840	)		(5,158	)		(6,679	)		(5,027	)		(11,706	)
Recoveries of loans previously charged off		450			11			461			1,257			17			1,274

Net loans recovered (charged off)		(2,868	)		(1,829	)		(4,697	)		(5,422	)		(5,010	)		(10,432	)

Balance, March 31	$	42,302		$	3,633		$	45,935
Provision for loan losses for non-covered loans											750			—			750
Provision for loan losses before benefit attributable to FDIC loss share agreements											—			500			500
Benefit attributable to FDIC loss share agreements											—			(400	)		(400	)

Net provision for loan losses											—			100			100
Increase in FDIC indemnification asset											—			400			400

Balance, June 30										$	40,498		$	952		$	41,450

The following tables present the balance in the allowance for loan losses for the non-covered loan portfolio for the ~~three-month period~~three and six-month periods ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2013 and the allowance for loan losses and recorded investment in loans not covered by loss share based on portfolio segment by impairment method as of ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2013. Allocation of a portion of the allowance to one type of loans does not preclude its availability to absorb losses in other categories. Additionally, the Company’s discount for credit losses on non-covered loans acquired was $80.3 million and $81.7 million at ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively.


	As of June 30, 2013
	Construction/ Land Development		Other Commercial Real Estate		Residential Real Estate		Commercial & Industrial		Consumer & Other		Unallocated		Total
	(In thousands)
Allowance for loan losses:
Period end amount allocated to:
Loans individually evaluated for impairment	$	3,959	$	11,184	$	2,408	$	1	$	—	$	—	$	17,552
Loans collectively evaluated for impairment		2,497		6,977		6,007		2,696		1,053		3,716		22,946

Loans evaluated for impairment, balance, June 30		6,456		18,161		8,415		2,697		1,053		3,716		40,498

Purchased credit impaired loans acquired		—		—		—		—		—		—		—

Balance, June 30	$	6,456	$	18,161	$	8,415	$	2,697	$	1,053	$	3,716	$	40,498

Loans receivable:
Period end amount allocated to:
Loans individually evaluated for impairment	$	28,509	$	79,030	$	17,840	$	1,799	$	403	$	—	$	127,581
Loans collectively evaluated for impairment		241,405		870,594		556,213		266,317		82,525		—		2,017,054

Loans evaluated for impairment balance, June 30		269,914		949,624		574,053		268,116		82,928		—		2,144,635

Purchased credit impaired loans acquired		12,080		84,886		75,106		19,235		3,300		—		194,607

Balance, June 30	$	281,994	$	1,034,510	$	649,159	$	287,351	$	86,228	$	—	$	2,339,242

The following tables present the balance in the allowance for loan losses for the non-covered loan portfolio for the year ended December 31, 2012, and the allowance for loan losses and recorded investment in loans not covered by loss share based on portfolio segment by impairment method as of December 31, 2012. Allocation of a portion of the allowance to one type of loans does not preclude its availability to absorb losses in other categories.


	Year Ended December 31, 2012
	Construction/ Land Development			Other Commercial Real Estate			Residential Real Estate			Commercial & Industrial			Consumer & Other			Unallocated			Total
	(In thousands)
Allowance for loan losses:
Beginning balance	$	7,945		$	20,368		$	12,196		$	6,308		$	3,258		$	2,054		$	52,129
Loans charged off		(313	)		(271	)		(1,195	)		(209	)		(1,082	)		—			(3,070	)
Recoveries of loans previously charged off		7			272			108			87			313			—			787

Net loans recovered (charged off)		(306	)		1			(1,087	)		(122	)		(769	)		—			(2,283	)
Provision for loan losses		(2,343	)		789			1,233			1,752			91			(1,522	)		—

Balance, June 30		5,296			21,158			12,342			7,938			2,580			532			49,846
Loans charged off		(773	)		(1,113	)		(3,228	)		(1,133	)		(1,476	)		—			(7,723	)
Recoveries of loans previously charged off		2			932			570			37			256			—			1,797

Net loans recovered (charged off)		(771	)		(181	)		(2,658	)		(1,096	)		(1,220	)		—			(5,926	)
Provision for loan losses		1,291			(1,003	)		4,129			(2,972	)		(72	)		(123	)		1,250

Balance, December 31	$	5,816		$	19,974		$	13,813		$	3,870		$	1,288		$	409		$	45,170


	Year Ended December 31, 2012
	Construction/ Land Development			Other Commercial Real Estate			Residential Real Estate			Commercial & Industrial			Consumer & Other			Unallocated			Total
	(In thousands)
Allowance for loan losses:
Beginning balance	$	7,945		$	20,368		$	12,196		$	6,308		$	3,258		$	2,054		$	52,129
Loans charged off		(46	)		(59	)		(715	)		(206	)		(443	)		—			(1,469	)
Recoveries of loans previously charged off		4			24			40			80			206			—			354

Net loans recovered (charged off)		(42	)		(35	)		(675	)		(126	)		(237	)		—			(1,115	)
Provision for loan losses		1,505			(1,554	)		1,176			762			79			(1,968	)		—

Balance, March 31		9,408			18,779			12,697			6,944			3,100			86			51,014
Loans charged off		(1,040	)		(1,325	)		(3,708	)		(1,136	)		(2,115	)		—			(9,324	)
Recoveries of loans previously charged off		5			1,180			638			44			363			—			2,230

Net loans recovered (charged off)		(1,035	)		(145	)		(3,070	)		(1,092	)		(1,752	)		—			(7,094	)
Provision for loan losses		(2,557	)		1,340			4,186			(1,982	)		(60	)		323			1,250

Balance, December 31	$	5,816		$	19,974		$	13,813		$	3,870		$	1,288		$	409		$	45,170

																						As of December 31, 2012
	As of December 31, 2012																					Construction/ Land Development		Other Commercial Real Estate		Residential Real Estate		Commercial & Industrial		Consumer & Other		Unallocated		Total
	Construction/ Land Development			Other Commercial Real Estate			Residential Real Estate			Commercial & Industrial			Consumer & Other			Unallocated			Total			(In thousands)
Allowance for loan losses:
Period end amount allocated to:
Loans individually evaluated for impairment	$	4,070		$	14,215		$	9,365		$	1,421		$	338		$	—		$	29,409		$	4,070	$	14,215	$	9,365	$	1,421	$	338	$	—	$	29,409
Loans collectively evaluated for impairment		1,746			5,759			4,448			2,449			950			409			15,761			1,746		5,759		4,448		2,449		950		409		15,761

Loans evaluated for impairment balance, December 31																							5,816		19,974		13,813		3,870		1,288		409		45,170

Purchased credit impaired loans acquired																							—		—		—		—		—		—		—

Balance, December 31	$	5,816		$	19,974		$	13,813		$	3,870		$	1,288		$	409		$	45,170		$	5,816	$	19,974	$	13,813	$	3,870	$	1,288	$	409	$	45,170

Loans receivable:
Period end amount allocated to:
Loans individually evaluated for impairment	$	28,181		$	93,610		$	33,994		$	3,690		$	746		$	—		$	160,221		$	28,181	$	93,610	$	33,994	$	3,690	$	746	$	—	$	160,221
Loans collectively evaluated for impairment		210,333			862,128			559,066			227,447			83,932			—			1,942,906			210,333		862,128		559,066		227,447		83,932		—		1,942,906

Loans evaluated for impairment balance, December 31		238,514			955,738			593,060			231,137			84,678			—			2,103,127			238,514		955,738		593,060		231,137		84,678		—		2,103,127

Acquired loans from Heritage and Premier		16,286			95,814			85,951			25,771			4,250			—			228,072
Purchased credit impaired loans acquired																							16,286		95,814		85,951		25,771		4,250		—		228,072

Balance, December 31	$	254,800		$	1,051,552		$	679,011		$	256,908		$	88,928		$	—		$	2,331,199		$	254,800	$	1,051,552	$	679,011	$	256,908	$	88,928	$	—	$	2,331,199

The following is an aging analysis for the non-covered loan portfolio as of ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012:


	March 31, 2013														June 30, 2013
	Loans Past Due 30-59 Days		Loans Past Due 60-89 Days		Loans Past Due 90 Days or More		Total Past Due		Current Loans		Total Loans Receivable		Accruing Loans Past Due 90 Days or More		Loans Past Due 30-59 Days		Loans Past Due 60-89 Days		Loans Past Due 90 Days or More		Total Past Due		Current Loans		Total Loans Receivable		Accruing Loans Past Due 90 Days or More
	(In thousands)														(In thousands)
Real estate:
Commercial real estate loans
Non-farm/non-residential	$	1,014	$	4,088	$	5,144	$	10,246	$	1,004,055	$	1,014,301	$	2,401	$	3,537	$	715	$	8,529	$	12,781	$	990,610	$	1,003,391	$	5,073
Construction/land development		1,829		122		3,808		5,759		248,914		254,673		1,210		1,579		99		4,856		6,534		275,460		281,994		1,906
Agricultural		—		—		118		118		34,170		34,288		—		—		—		108		108		31,011		31,119		—
Residential real estate loans
Residential 1-4 family		4,467		3,274		12,618		20,359		511,339		531,698		2,456		3,344		1,109		12,810		17,263		510,997		528,260		3,601
Multifamily residential		8		—		1,596		1,604		121,394		122,998		—		—		10		340		350		120,549		120,899		—

Total real estate		7,318		7,484		23,284		38,086		1,919,872		1,957,958		6,067		8,460		1,933		26,643		37,036		1,928,627		1,965,663		10,580
Consumer		362		157		447		966		32,857		33,823		27		333		317		406		1,056		31,615		32,671		85
Commercial and industrial		1,235		432		2,039		3,706		265,757		269,463		598		500		679		2,263		3,442		283,909		287,351		849
Agricultural and other		191		16		—		207		47,695		47,902		—		165		15		—		180		53,377		53,557		—

Total	$	9,106	$	8,089	$	25,770	$	42,965	$	2,266,181	$	2,309,146	$	6,692	$	9,458	$	2,944	$	29,312	$	41,714	$	2,297,528	$	2,339,242	$	11,514


	December 31, 2012														December 31, 2012
	Loans Past Due 30-59 Days		Loans Past Due 60-89 Days		Loans Past Due 90 Days or More		Total Past Due		Current Loans		Total Loans Receivable		Accruing Loans Past Due 90 Days or More		Loans Past Due 30-59 Days		Loans Past Due 60-89 Days		Loans Past Due 90 Days or More		Total Past Due		Current Loans		Total Loans Receivable		Accruing Loans Past Due 90 Days or More
	(In thousands)														(In thousands)
Real estate:
Commercial real estate loans
Non-farm/non-residential	$	8,670	$	399	$	5,096	$	14,165	$	1,004,874	$	1,019,039	$	1,437	$	8,670	$	399	$	5,096	$	14,165	$	1,004,874	$	1,019,039	$	1,437
Construction/land development		374		732		3,976		5,082		249,718		254,800		1,296		374		732		3,976		5,082		249,718		254,800		1,296
Agricultural		—		—		140		140		32,373		32,513		—		—		—		140		140		32,373		32,513		—
Residential real estate loans
Residential 1-4 family		3,724		1,978		12,561		18,263		531,006		549,269		2,589		3,724		1,978		12,561		18,263		531,006		549,269		2,589
Multifamily residential		157		4,439		3,215		7,811		121,931		129,742		—		157		4,439		3,215		7,811		121,931		129,742		—

Total real estate		12,925		7,548		24,988		45,461		1,939,902		1,985,363		5,322		12,925		7,548		24,988		45,461		1,939,902		1,985,363		5,322
Consumer		780		187		688		1,655		35,807		37,462		95		780		187		688		1,655		35,807		37,462		95
Commercial and industrial		1,310		254		1,597		3,161		253,747		256,908		520		1,310		254		1,597		3,161		253,747		256,908		520
Agricultural and other		262		116		—		378		51,088		51,466		—		262		116		—		378		51,088		51,466		—

Total	$	15,277	$	8,105	$	27,273	$	50,655	$	2,280,544	$	2,331,199	$	5,937	$	15,277	$	8,105	$	27,273	$	50,655	$	2,280,544	$	2,331,199	$	5,937

Non-accruing loans not covered by loss share at ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012 were ~~$19.1~~$17.8 million and $21.3 million, respectively.

The following is a summary of the non-covered impaired loans as of ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012:


	March 31, 2013										June 30, 2013
	Unpaid				Allocation		Three Months Ended										Three Months Ended				Six Months Ended
	Contractual Principal Balance		Total Recorded Investment		of Allowance for Loan Losses		Average Recorded Investment		Interest Recognized		Unpaid Contractual Principal Balance		Total Recorded Investment		Allocation of Allowance for Loan Losses		Average Recorded Investment		Interest Recognized		Average Recorded Investment		Interest Recognized
	(In thousands)										(In thousands)
Loans without a specific valuation allowance
Real estate:
Commercial real estate loans
Non-farm/non-residential	$	57,390	$	56,379	$	11,323	$	65,005	$	620	$	5,825	$	5,825	$	—	$	3,978	$	77	$	5,176	$	109
Construction/land development		23,680		23,680		3,773		22,023		193		—		—		—		264		—		176		8
Agricultural		118		118		—		59		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—
Residential real estate loans
Residential 1-4 family		16,161		16,011		1,430		17,751		58		1,665		1,368		—		1,672		16		1,232		34
Multifamily residential		3,653		3,653		2,269		7,084		15		1,335		69		—		668		1		445		1

Total real estate		101,002		99,841		18,795		111,922		886		8,825		7,262		—		6,582		94		7,029		152
Consumer		448		448		—		597		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—
Commercial and industrial		2,409		2,409		2		2,422		6		6		6		—		6		—		101		—
Agricultural and other		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—

Total	$	103,859	$	102,698	$	18,797	$	114,941	$	892


	December 31, 2012
	Unpaid				Allocation		Year Ended
	Contractual Principal Balance		Total Recorded Investment		of Allowance for Loan Losses		Average Recorded Investment		Interest Recognized
	(In thousands)
Total loans without a specific valuation allowance												8,831		7,268		—		6,588		94		7,130		152
Loans with a specific valuation allowance
Real estate:
Commercial real estate loans
Non-farm/non-residential	$	74,952	$	73,631	$	14,215	$	74,360	$	3,828		52,336		51,311		11,184		51,579		613		56,406		1,201
Construction/land development		20,592		20,366		4,070		20,803		956		25,080		25,038		3,959		23,490		222		22,448		406
Agricultural		—		—		—		7		1		108		108		—		113		—		75		—
Residential real estate loans
Residential 1-4 family		19,717		19,491		6,852		21,230		810		10,524		10,499		1,278		11,134		70		13,802		111
Multifamily residential		10,515		10,515		2,513		7,716		353		2,327		2,327		1,130		2,357		15		5,076		30

Total real estate		125,776		124,003		27,650		124,116		5,948		90,375		89,283		17,551		88,673		920		97,807		1,748
Consumer		752		746		338		1,078		51		403		402		—		416		2		526		2
Commercial and industrial		2,511		2,436		1,421		7,366		413		1,793		1,793		1		1,799		6		1,914		12
Agricultural and other		—		—		—		962		21		—		—		—		—		—		—		—

Total	$	129,039	$	127,185	$	29,409	$	133,522	$	6,433
Total loans with a specific valuation allowance												92,571		91,478		17,552		90,888		928		100,247		1,762
Total impaired loans
Real estate:
Commercial real estate loans
Non-farm/non-residential												58,161		57,136		11,184		55,557		690		61,582		1,310
Construction/land development												25,080		25,038		3,959		23,754		222		22,624		414
Agricultural												108		108		—		113		—		75		—
Residential real estate loans
Residential 1-4 family												12,189		11,867		1,278		12,806		86		15,034		145
Multifamily residential												3,662		2,396		1,130		3,024		16		5,521		31

Total real estate												99,200		96,545		17,551		95,254		1,014		104,836		1,900
Consumer												403		402		—		416		2		526		2
Commercial and industrial												1,799		1,799		1		1,805		6		2,015		12
Agricultural and other												—		—		—		—		—		—		—

Total impaired loans											$	101,402	$	98,746	$	17,552	$	97,475	$	1,022	$	107,377	$	1,914

Note: Purchased non-covered loans acquired with deteriorated credit quality are accounted for on a pooled basis under ASC 310-30. All of these pools are currently considered to be performing resulting in none of the ~~Company’s~~purchased non-covered loans acquired with deteriorated credit quality being classified as non-covered impaired loans ~~have~~as of June 30, 2013.


	December 31, 2012
							Year Ended
	Unpaid Contractual Principal Balance		Total Recorded Investment		Allocation of Allowance for Loan Losses		Average Recorded Investment		Interest Recognized
	(In thousands)
Loans without a specific valuation allowance
Real estate:
Commercial real estate loans
Non-farm/non-residential	$	7,574	$	7,571	$	—	$	2,478	$	73
Construction/land development		—		—		—		1,314		—
Agricultural		—		—		—		—		—
Residential real estate loans
Residential 1-4 family		353		353		—		712		4
Multifamily residential		—		—		—		—		—

Total real estate		7,927		7,924		—		4,504		77
Consumer		—		—		—		—		—
Commercial and industrial		292		292		—		134		2
Agricultural and other		—		—		—		—		—

Total loans without a specific valuation allowance		8,219		8,216		—		4,638		79
Loans with a specific valuation allowance
Real estate:
Commercial real estate loans
Non-farm/non-residential		67,378		66,060		14,215		71,882		3,755
Construction/land development		20,592		20,366		4,070		19,489		956
Agricultural		—		—		—		7		1
Residential real estate loans
Residential 1-4 family		19,364		19,138		6,852		20,518		806
Multifamily residential		10,515		10,515		2,513		7,716		353

Total real estate		117,849		116,079		27,650		119,612		5,871
Consumer		752		746		338		1,078		51
Commercial and industrial		2,219		2,144		1,421		7,232		411
Agricultural and other		—		—		—		962		21

Total loans with a specific valuation allowance		120,820		118,969		29,409		128,884		6,354
Total impaired loans
Real estate:
Commercial real estate loans
Non-farm/non-residential		74,952		73,631		14,215		74,360		3,828
Construction/land development		20,592		20,366		4,070		20,803		956
Agricultural		—		—		—		7		1
Residential real estate loans
Residential 1-4 family		19,717		19,491		6,852		21,230		810
Multifamily residential		10,515		10,515		2,513		7,716		353

Total real estate		125,776		124,003		27,650		124,116		5,948
Consumer		752		746		338		1,078		51
Commercial and industrial		2,511		2,436		1,421		7,366		413
Agricultural and other		—		—		—		962		21

Total impaired loans	$	129,039	$	127,185	$	29,409	$	133,522	$	6,433

Note: Purchased non-covered loans acquired with deteriorated credit quality are accounted for on a ~~specific allocation~~pooled basis under ASC 310-30. All of these pools are currently considered to be performing resulting in none of the ~~allowance for loan losses,~~purchased non-covered loans acquired with ~~the exception~~deteriorated credit quality being classified as non-covered impaired loans as of ~~certain troubled debt restructurings (“TDR”) where the discounted cash flows under the restructuring are greater than or equal to those under the original terms of the loan.~~ December 31, 2012.

Interest recognized on non-covered impaired loans during the three months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2013 and 2012 was approximately ~~$892,000~~$1.0 million and ~~$1.8~~$1.6 million, respectively. Interest recognized on non-covered impaired loans during the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012 was approximately $1.9 million and $3.4 million, respectively. The amount of interest recognized on non-covered impaired loans on the cash basis is not materially different than the accrual basis.

Credit Quality Indicators. As part of the on-going monitoring of the credit quality of the Company’s loan portfolio, management tracks certain credit quality indicators including trends related to (i) the risk rating of loans, (ii) the level of classified loans, (iii) net charge-offs, (iv) non-performing loans and (v) the general economic conditions in Florida, Arkansas and Alabama.

The Company utilizes a risk rating matrix to assign a risk rating to each of its loans. Loans are rated on a scale from 1 to 8. Descriptions of the general characteristics of the 8 risk ratings are as follows:

The Company’s classified loans include loans in risk ratings 6, 7 and 8. The following is a presentation of classified non-covered loans (excluding loans accounted for under ASC Topic 310-30) by class as of ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012:


	March 31, 2013								June 30, 2013
	Risk Rated 6		Risk Rated 7		Risk Rated 8		Classified Total		Risk Rated 6		Risk Rated 7		Risk Rated 8		Classified Total
	(In thousands)								(In thousands)
Real estate:
Commercial real estate loans
Non-farm/non-residential	$	51,818	$	31	$	—	$	51,849	$	51,425	$	302	$	—	$	51,727
Construction/land development		17,858		—		—		17,858		20,985		—		—		20,985
Agricultural		118		—		—		118		108		—		—		108
Residential real estate loans
Residential 1-4 family		18,235		51		—		18,286		14,975		48		—		15,023
Multifamily residential		3,653		—		—		3,653		2,396		—		—		2,396

Total real estate		91,682		82		—		91,764		89,889		350		—		90,239
Consumer		880		—		—		880		757		—		—		757
Commercial and industrial		3,041		16		—		3,057		2,879		16		—		2,895
Agricultural and other		39		—		—		39		39		—		—		39

Total	$	95,642	$	98	$	—	$	95,740	$	93,564	$	366	$	—	$	93,930


	December 31, 2012
	Risk Rated 6		Risk Rated 7		Risk Rated 8		Classified Total
	(In thousands)
Real estate:
Commercial real estate loans
Non-farm/non-residential	$	55,906	$	14	$	—	$	55,920
Construction/land development		17,805		—		—		17,805
Agricultural		140		—		—		140
Residential real estate loans
Residential 1-4 family		19,172		319		—		19,491
Multifamily residential		5,272		—		—		5,272

Total real estate		98,295		333		—		98,628
Consumer		1,495		—		—		1,495
Commercial and industrial		3,226		15		—		3,241
Agricultural and other		39		—		—		39

Total	$	103,055	$	348	$	—	$	103,403

Loans may be classified, but not considered impaired, due to one of the following reasons: (1) The Company has established minimum dollar amount thresholds for loan impairment testing. All loans over $1.0 million that are rated 5 – 8 are individually assessed for impairment on a quarterly basis. Loans rated 5 – 8 that fall under the threshold amount are not individually tested for impairment and therefore are not included in impaired loans; (2) of the loans that are above the threshold amount and tested for impairment, after testing, some are considered to not be impaired and are not included in impaired loans.

The following is a presentation of non-covered loans by class and risk rating as of ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012:


	March 31, 2013															June 30, 2013
	Risk Rated 1		Risk Rated 2		Risk Rated 3		Risk Rated 4		Risk Rated 5		Classified Total		Total			Risk Rated 1		Risk Rated 2		Risk Rated 3		Risk Rated 4		Risk Rated 5		Classified Total		Total
	(In thousands)															(In thousands)
Real estate:
Commercial real estate loans
Non-farm/non-residential	$	6	$	52	$	493,771	$	344,290	$	32,413	$	51,849	$	922,381		$	5	$	50	$	499,892	$	332,516	$	35,252	$	51,727	$	919,442
Construction/land development		39		116		68,825		145,537		6,855		17,858		239,230			113		114		81,850		162,384		4,468		20,985		269,914
Agricultural		—		—		11,253		21,288		—		118		32,659			—		—		12,091		17,984		—		108		30,183
Residential real estate loans
Residential 1-4 family		446		151		297,376		127,190		14,752		18,286		458,201			440		150		307,499		123,851		12,287		15,023		459,250
Multifamily residential		—		—		22,778		88,122		1,231		3,653		115,784			—		—		22,922		88,261		1,224		2,396		114,803

Total real estate		491		319		894,003		726,427		55,251		91,764		1,768,255			558		314		924,254		724,996		53,231		90,239		1,793,592
Consumer		7,921		97		14,052		6,757		678		880		30,385			7,982		106		12,729		7,392		567		757		29,533
Commercial and industrial		10,326		804		143,052		86,303		1,912		3,057		245,454			12,386		798		161,535		87,921		2,581		2,895		268,116
Agricultural and other		181		2,378		28,856		16,203		—		39		47,657			148		1,987		24,810		26,410		—		39		53,394

Total	$	18,919	$	3,598	$	1,079,963	$	835,690	$	57,841	$	95,740	$	2,091,751
Total risk rated loans																$	21,074	$	3,205	$	1,123,328	$	846,719	$	56,379	$	93,930	$	2,144,635

Purchased credit impaired loans acquired															Purchased credit impaired loans acquired														194,607

Total non-covered loans																												$	2,339,242
	December 31, 2012
	Risk Rated 1		Risk Rated 2		Risk Rated 3		Risk Rated 4		Risk Rated 5		Classified Total		Total
	(In thousands)
Real estate:
Commercial real estate loans
Non-farm/non-residential	$	7	$	53	$	483,816	$	350,768	$	34,354	$	55,920	$	924,918
Construction/land development		41		116		65,215		147,908		7,429		17,805		238,514
Agricultural		—		—		10,920		19,761		—		140		30,821
Residential real estate loans
Residential 1-4 family		461		155		305,369		131,698		14,873		19,491		472,047
Multifamily residential		—		—		23,760		86,459		5,521		5,272		121,012

Total real estate		509		324		889,080		736,594		62,177		98,628		1,787,312
Consumer		8,785		105		14,771		7,865		658		1,495		33,679
Commercial and industrial		10,431		1,248		119,599		94,713		1,905		3,241		231,137
Agricultural and other		244		2,517		28,755		19,443		1		39		50,999

Total	$	19,969	$	4,194	$	1,052,205	$	858,615	$	64,741	$	103,403	$	2,103,127

The following is a presentation of non-covered TDR’s by class as of ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012:


	March 31, 2013												June 30, 2013
	Number of Loans		Pre-Modification Outstanding Balance		Rate Modification		Term Modification		Rate & Term Modification		Post- Modification Outstanding Balance		Number of Loans		Pre- Modification Outstanding Balance		Rate Modification		Term Modification		Rate & Term Modification		Post- Modification Outstanding Balance
	(In thousands)												(Dollars in thousands)
Real estate:
Commercial real estate loans
Non-farm/non-residential		28	$	44,959	$	19,017	$	9,674	$	11,968	$	40,659		26	$	44,772	$	18,969	$	9,667	$	11,735	$	40,371
Construction/land development		4		9,227		6,465		1,798		—		8,263		4		9,227		6,419		1,798		—		8,217
Residential real estate loans
Residential 1-4 family		11		4,426		3,054		348		794		4,196		11		4,426		2,902		340		778		4,020
Multifamily residential		2		4,213		3,395		—		—		3,395		2		4,213		2,126		—		—		2,126

Total real estate		45		62,825		31,931		11,820		12,762		56,513		43		62,638		30,416		11,805		12,513		54,734
Commercial and industrial		2		394		6		—		364		370		2		394		6		—		357		363

Total		47	$	63,219	$	31,937	$	11,820	$	13,126	$	56,883		45	$	63,032	$	30,422	$	11,805	$	12,870	$	55,097

   December 31, 2012
   Number
of Loans    Pre-Modification
Outstanding
Balance    Rate
Modification    Term
Modification    Rate
& Term
Modification    Post-
Modification
Outstanding
Balance
   (In thousands)
Real estate:

Commercial real estate loans

Non-farm/non-residential
   34       $ 48,672       $ 22,710       $ 11,198       $ 10,449       $ 44,357
Construction/land development
   3       9,117       6,489       1,688       —         8,177
Residential real estate loans

Residential 1-4 family
   11       4,621       3,337       348       623       4,308
Multifamily residential
   2       4,213       3,377       —         —         3,377












Total real estate
   50       66,623       35,913       13,234       11,072       60,219
Commercial and industrial
   5       683       6       272       385       663












Total
   55       $ 67,306       $ 35,919       $ 13,506       $ 11,457       $ 60,882

The following is a presentation of non-covered TDR’s on non-accrual status as of ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012 because they are not in compliance with the modified terms:


	March 31, 2013				December 31, 2012				June 30, 2013				December 31, 2012
	Number of Loans		Recorded Balance		Number of Loans		Recorded Balance		Number of Loans		Recorded Balance		Number of Loans		Recorded Balance
	(In thousands)								(Dollars in thousands)
Real estate:
Commercial real estate loans
Non-farm/non-residential		—	$	—		2	$	761		1	$	301		2	$	761
Residential real estate loans
Residential 1-4 family		6		1,417		5		2,665		5		884		5		2,665
Multifamily residential		1		1,338		—		—		1		69		—		—

Total real estate		7		2,755		7		3,426		7		1,254		7		3,426

Total		7	$	2,755		7	$	3,426		7	$	1,254		7	$	3,426

During the second quarter of 2013, impairment testing on the estimated cash flows of the covered loans established that one pool evaluated had experienced material projected credit deterioration. As a result, the Company recorded a $500,000 provision for loan losses to the allowance for loan losses related to the purchased impaired loans during the three month period ended June 30, 2013. Since these loans are covered by loss share with the FDIC, the Company was able to increase its indemnification asset by $400,000 resulting in a net provision for loan losses of $100,000.

During the second quarter of 2012, impairment testing on the estimated cash flows of the covered loans established that two pools evaluated had experienced material projected credit deterioration. As a result, the Company recorded a $6.6 million provision for loan losses to the allowance for loan losses related to the purchased impaired loans during the three month period ended June 30, 2012. Since these loans are covered by loss share with the FDIC, the Company was able to increase its indemnification asset by $5.3 million resulting in a net provision for loan losses of $1.3 million.

During the third quarter of 2012, impairment testing on the estimated cash flows of the covered loans established that two pools evaluated had experienced projected credit deterioration. As a result, the Company recorded an $837,000 provision for loan losses to the allowance for loan losses related to the purchased impaired loans during the three month period ended September 30, 2012. Since these loans are covered by loss share with the FDIC, the Company was able to increase its indemnification asset by $670,000 resulting in a net provision for loan losses of $167,000.

The following tables present the balance in the allowance for loan losses for the covered loan portfolio for the ~~three-month period~~three and six-month periods ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2013, and the allowance for loan losses and recorded investment in loans covered by FDIC loss share based on portfolio segment by impairment method as of ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2013.


	Three Months Ended March 31, 2013																			Three Months Ended June 30, 2013
	Construction/ Land Development			Other Commercial Real Estate			Residential Real Estate			Commercial & Industrial			Consumer & Other		Unallocated		Total			Construction/ Land Development			Other Commercial Real Estate			Residential Real Estate			Commercial & Industrial			Consumer & Other		Unallocated		Total
	(In thousands)																			(In thousands)
Allowance for loan losses:
Beginning balance	$	1,169		$	4,005		$	228		$	60		$	—	$	—	$	5,462		$	263		$	3,039		$	278		$	53		$	—	$	—	$	3,633
Loans charged off		(878	)		(409	)		(553	)		—			—		—		(1,840	)		—			(3,016	)		(171	)		—			—		—		(3,187	)
Recoveries of loans previously charged off		—			5			6			—			—		—		11			—			1			5			—			—		—		6

Net loans recovered (charged off)		(878	)		(404	)		(547	)		—			—		—		(1,829	)		—			(3,015	)		(166	)		—			—		—		(3,181	)
Provision for loan losses before benefit attributable to FDIC loss share agreements		(28	)		(562	)		597			(7	)		—		—		—			(102	)		448			174			(20	)		—		—		500
Benefit attributable to FDIC loss share agreements		22			450			(478	)		6			—		—		—			82			(359	)		(139	)		16			—		—		(400	)

Net provision for loan losses		(6	)		(112	)		119			(1	)		—		—		—			(20	)		89			35			(4	)		—		—		100
Increase in FDIC indemnification asset		(22	)		(450	)		478			(6	)		—		—		—			(82	)		359			139			(16	)		—		—		400

Balance, March 31	$	263		$	3,039		$	278		$	53		$	—	$	—	$	3,633
Balance, June 30																				$	161		$	472		$	286		$	33		$	—	$	—	$	952


																				Six Months Ended June 30, 2013
																				Construction/ Land Development			Other Commercial Real Estate			Residential Real Estate			Commercial & Industrial			Consumer & Other		Unallocated		Total
																				(In thousands)
Allowance for loan losses:
Beginning balance																				$	1,169		$	4,005		$	228		$	60		$	—	$	—	$	5,462
Loans charged off																					(720	)		(3,426	)		(724	)		(157	)		—		—		(5,027	)
Recoveries of loans previously charged off																					—			6			11			—			—		—		17

Net loans recovered (charged off)																					(720	)		(3,420	)		(713	)		(157	)		—		—		(5,010	)
Provision for loan losses before benefit attributable to FDIC loss share agreements																					(288	)		(113	)		771			130			—		—		500
Benefit attributable to FDIC loss share agreements																					230			90			(616	)		(104	)		—		—		(400	)

Net provision for loan losses																					(58	)		(23	)		155			26			—		—		100
Increase in FDIC indemnification asset																					(230	)		(90	)		616			104			—		—		400

Balance, June 30																				$	161		$	472		$	286		$	33		$	—	$	—	$	952


																				As of June 30, 2013
	As of March 31, 2013																			Construction/ Land Development			Other Commercial Real Estate			Residential Real Estate			Commercial & Industrial			Consumer & Other		Unallocated		Total
	Construction/ Land Development			Other Commercial Real Estate			Residential Real Estate			Commercial & Industrial			Consumer & Other		Unallocated		Total			(In thousands)
Allowance for loan losses:
Period end amount allocated to:
Loans individually evaluated for impairment	$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—	$	—	$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—	$	—	$	—
Loans collectively evaluated for impairment		263			3,039			278			53			—		—		3,633			—			—			—			—			—		—		—

Balance, March 31	$	263		$	3,039		$	278		$	53		$	—	$	—	$	3,633
Loans evaluated for impairment balance, June 30																					—			—			—			—			—		—		—

Purchased credit impaired loans acquired																					161			472			286			33			—		—		952

Balance, June 30																				$	161		$	472		$	286		$	33		$	—	$	—	$	952

Loans receivable:
Period end amount allocated to:
Loans individually evaluated for impairment	$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—	$	—	$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—	$	—	$	—
Loans collectively evaluated for impairment		58,384			157,601			129,689			11,712			1,283		—		358,669			—			—			—			—			—		—		—

Balance, March 31	$	58,384		$	157,601		$	129,689		$	11,712		$	1,283	$	—	$	358,669
Loans evaluated for impairment balance, June 30																					—			—			—			—			—		—		—

Purchased credit impaired loans acquired																					56,447			145,706			118,256			8,193			1,200		—		329,802

Balance, June 30																				$	56,447		$	145,706		$	118,256		$	8,193		$	1,200	$	—	$	329,802

The following tables present the balance in the allowance for loan losses for the covered loan portfolio for the period ended December 31, 2012, and the allowance for loan losses and recorded investment in loans covered by FDIC loss share based on portfolio segment by impairment method as of December 31, 2012.


	Year Ended December 31, 2012																				Year Ended December 31, 2012
	Construction/ Land Development			Other Commercial Real Estate			Residential Real Estate			Commercial & Industrial			Consumer & Other			Unallocated		Total			Construction/ Land Development			Other Commercial Real Estate			Residential Real Estate			Commercial & Industrial			Consumer & Other			Unallocated		Total
	(In thousands)																				(In thousands)
Allowance for loan losses:
Beginning balance	$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—	$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—	$	—
Loans charged off		(648	)		(970	)		(132	)		(14	)		(278	)		—		(2,042	)		—			—			—			—			—			—		—
Recoveries of loans previously charged off		—			—			2			—			—			—		2			—			—			—			—			—			—		—

Net loans recovered (charged off)		(648	)		(970	)		(130	)		(14	)		(278	)		—		(2,040	)		—			—			—			—			—			—		—
Provision for loan losses before benefit attributable to FDIC loss share agreements		1,817			4,975			358			74			278			—		7,502			1,527			4,391			533			59			155			—		6,665
Benefit attributable to FDIC loss share agreements		(1,454	)		(3,980	)		(286	)		(60	)		(222	)		—		(6,002	)		(1,222	)		(3,513	)		(426	)		(47	)		(124	)		—		(5,332	)

Net provision for loan losses		363			995			72			14			56			—		1,500			305			878			107			12			31			—		1,333
Increase in FDIC indemnification asset		1,454			3,980			286			60			222			—		6,002			1,222			3,513			426			47			124			—		5,332

Balance, June 30																						1,527			4,391			533			59			155			—		6,665
Loans charged off																						(648	)		(970	)		(132	)		(14	)		(278	)		—		(2,042	)
Recoveries of loans previously charged off																						—			—			2			—			—			—		2

Net loans recovered (charged off)																						(648	)		(970	)		(130	)		(14	)		(278	)		—		(2,040	)
Provision for loan losses before benefit attributable to FDIC loss share agreements																						290			584			(175	)		15			123			—		837
Benefit attributable to FDIC loss share agreements																						(232	)		(467	)		140			(13	)		(98	)		—		(670	)

Net provision for loan losses																						58			117			(35	)		2			25			—		167
Increase in FDIC indemnification asset																						232			467			(140	)		13			98			—		670

Balance, December 31	$	1,169		$	4,005		$	228		$	60		$	—		$	—	$	5,462		$	1,169		$	4,005		$	228		$	60		$	—		$	—	$	5,462


																					As of December 31, 2012
	As of December 31, 2012																				Construction/ Land Development			Other Commercial Real Estate			Residential Real Estate			Commercial & Industrial			Consumer & Other			Unallocated		Total
	Construction/ Land Development			Other Commercial Real Estate			Residential Real Estate			Commercial & Industrial			Consumer & Other			Unallocated		Total			(In thousands)
Allowance for loan losses:
Period end amount allocated to:
Loans individually evaluated for impairment	$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—	$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—	$	—
Loans collectively evaluated for impairment		1,169			4,005			228			60			—			—		5,462			—			—			—			—			—			—		—

Loans evaluated for impairment balance, December 31																						—			—			—			—			—			—		—

Purchased credit impaired loans acquired																						1,169			4,005			228			60			—			—		5,462

Balance, December 31	$	1,169		$	4,005		$	228		$	60		$	—		$	—	$	5,462		$	1,169		$	4,005		$	228		$	60		$	—		$	—	$	5,462

Loans receivable:
Period end amount allocated to:
Loans individually evaluated for impairment	$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—	$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—	$	—
Loans collectively evaluated for impairment		66,713			167,005			135,192			14,668			1,306			—		384,884			—			—			—			—			—			—		—

Loans evaluated for impairment balance, December 31																						—			—			—			—			—			—		—

Purchased credit impaired loans acquired																						66,713			167,005			135,192			14,668			1,306			—		384,884

Balance, December 31	$	66,713		$	167,005		$	135,192		$	14,668		$	1,306		$	—	$	384,884		$	66,713		$	167,005		$	135,192		$	14,668		$	1,306		$	—	$	384,884

Changes in the carrying amount of the accretable yield for purchased credit impaired ~~and non-impaired~~ loans acquired were as follows for the period ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2013 for the Company’s covered and non-covered acquisitions:


	Accretable Yield			Carrying Amount of Loans			Accretable Yield			Carrying Amount of Loans
	(In thousands)						(In thousands)
Balance at beginning of period	$	127,371		$	612,956		$	127,371		$	612,956
Reforecasted future interest payments for loan pools		1,519			—			4,737			—
Accretion		(14,269	)		14,269			(27,999	)		27,999
Adjustment to yield		15,566			—			15,566			—
Transfers to foreclosed assets held for sale covered by FDIC loss share		—			(4,512	)		—			(3,577	)
Payments received, net		—			(46,649	)		—			(112,969	)

Balance at end of period	$	130,187		$	576,064		$	119,675		$	524,409

The loan pools were evaluated by the Company and are currently forecasted to have a slower run-off than originally expected. As a result, the Company has reforecast the total accretable yield expectations for those loan pools by ~~$1.5~~$4.7 million. This updated forecast does not change the expected weighted average yields on the loan pools.

Five pools evaluated by the Company were determined to have a materially projected credit improvement. As a result of this improvement, the Company will recognize approximately $15.6 million as an adjustment to yield over the weighted average life of the loans. Improvements in credit quality decrease the basis in the related indemnification assets. This positive event will reduce the indemnification asset by approximately $12.5 million and increase our FDIC true-up liability by $1.6 million. The $12.5 million will be amortized over the weighted average life of the loans or the life of the shared-loss agreements, whichever is shorter. The amortization will be shown as a reduction to FDIC indemnification non-interest income. The $1.6 million will be expensed over the remaining true-up measurement date as other non-interest expense. This will result in approximately ~~$1.5~~$4.7 million of pre-tax net income being recognized going forward which may or may not be symmetrical depending on the weighted average life of the loans.

Changes in the carrying amount and accumulated amortization of the Company’s goodwill and core deposits and other intangibles at ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, were as follows:


	March 31, 2013			December 31, 2012			June 30, 2013			December 31, 2012
	(In thousands)						(In thousands)
Goodwill
Balance, beginning of period	$	85,681		$	59,663		$	85,681		$	59,663
Vision and Premier acquisitions		—			26,018			—			26,018

Balance, end of period	$	85,681		$	85,681		$	85,681		$	85,681


	2013			2012			2013			2012
	(In thousands)						(In thousands)
Core Deposit and Other Intangibles
Balance, beginning of period	$	12,061		$	8,620		$	12,061		$	8,620
Vision Bank acquisition		—			3,190			—			3,190
Amortization expense		(802	)		(630	)		(1,604	)		(1,324	)

Balance, March 31	$	11,259			11,180
Balance, June 30							$	10,457			10,486

Premier and Heritage acquisitions					3,012						3,012
Amortization expense					(2,131	)					(1,437	)

Balance, end of year				$	12,061					$	12,061

The carrying basis and accumulated amortization of core deposits and other intangibles at ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012 were:


	March 31, 2013			December 31, 2012			June 30, 2013			December 31, 2012
	(In thousands)						(In thousands)
Gross carrying basis	$	29,663		$	29,663		$	29,663		$	29,663
Accumulated amortization		(18,404	)		(17,602	)		(19,206	)		(17,602	)

Net carrying amount	$	11,259		$	12,061		$	10,457		$	12,061

Core deposit and other intangible amortization expense was approximately $802,000 and ~~$630,000~~$694,000 for ~~each of~~ the three-months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively. Core deposit and other intangible amortization expense was approximately $1.6 million and $1.3 million for the six-months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively. As of ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2013, HBI’s estimated amortization expense of core deposits and other intangibles for each of the years 2013 through 2017 is approximately: 2013—$3.2 million; 2014—$3.1 million; 2015—$2.2 million; 2016—$973,000; 2017—$884,000.

The carrying amount of the Company’s goodwill was $85.7 million at both ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012. Goodwill is tested annually for impairment during the fourth quarter. If the implied fair value of goodwill is lower than its carrying amount, goodwill impairment is indicated and goodwill is written down to its implied fair value. Subsequent increases in goodwill value are not recognized in the financial statements.

Other assets consists primarily of FDIC claims receivable, equity securities without a readily determinable fair value and other miscellaneous assets. As of ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012 other assets were ~~$69.5~~$56.7 million and $75.7 million, respectively.

An indemnification asset was created when the Company acquired FDIC covered loans. The indemnification asset represents the carrying amount of the right to receive payments from the FDIC for losses incurred on specified assets acquired from failed insured depository institutions or otherwise purchased from the FDIC that are covered by loss-sharing agreements with the FDIC. When the Company experiences a loss on the covered loans and subsequently requests reimbursement of the loss from the FDIC, the indemnification asset is reduced by the FDIC reimbursable amount. A corresponding claim receivable is consequently recorded in other assets until the cash is received from the FDIC. The FDIC claims receivable were ~~$42.9~~$27.6 million and $45.2 million at ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively.

The Company has equity securities without readily determinable fair values. These equity securities are outside the scope of ASC Topic 320,Investments-Debt and Equity Securities. They include items such as stock holding in Federal Home Loan Bank, Federal Reserve Bank, Bankers’ Bank and other miscellaneous holdings. The equity securities without a readily determinable fair value were ~~$20.3~~$20.4 million and $20.2 million at ~~both March 31,~~June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively.

The aggregate amount of time deposits with a minimum denomination of $100,000 was ~~$485.1~~$460.9 million and $549.1 million at ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively. Interest expense applicable to certificates in excess of $100,000 totaled ~~$1.1~~$1.0 million and ~~$2.5~~$2.1 million for the three months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively. Interest expense applicable to certificates in excess of $100,000 totaled $2.1 million and $4.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively. As of ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, brokered deposits were ~~$51.9~~$26.0 million and $56.9 million, respectively.

Deposits totaling approximately ~~$493.9~~$451.8 million and $484.4 million at ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively, were public funds obtained primarily from state and political subdivisions in the United States.

At ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, securities sold under agreements to repurchase totaled ~~$77.2~~$73.5 million and $66.3 million, respectively. For the ~~three month~~three-month periods ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2013 and 2012, securities sold under agreements to repurchase daily weighted average totaled ~~$69.7~~$72.6 million and ~~$69.1~~$71.5 million, respectively. For the six-month periods ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, securities sold under agreements to repurchase daily weighted average totaled $71.1 million and $70.3 million, respectively.

The Company’s Federal Home Loan Bank (“FHLB”) borrowed funds were $130.3 million and $130.4 million at ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2013 and December 31, ~~2012.~~2012, respectively. All of the outstanding balance at ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012 were long-term advances. The FHLB advances mature from the current year to 2025 with fixed interest rates ranging from 2.020% to 4.799% and are secured by loans and investments securities. Expected maturities will differ from contractual maturities, because FHLB may have the right to call or prepay certain obligations.

Additionally, the Company had ~~$45.5~~$30.0 million and $90.5 million at ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively, in letters of credit under a FHLB blanket borrowing line of credit, which are used to collateralize public deposits at ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively.

Subordinated debentures at ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012 consisted of guaranteed payments on trust preferred securities with the following components:


	March 31, 2013		December 31, 2012		June 30, 2013		December 31, 2012
	(In thousands)				(In thousands)
Subordinated debentures, issued in 2003, due 2033, fixed at 6.40%, during the first five years and at a floating rate of 3.15% above the three-month LIBOR rate, reset quarterly, thereafter. Retired during the first quarter of 2013.	$	—	$	20,619	$	—	$	20,619
Subordinated debentures, issued in 2003, due 2033, floating rate of 3.15% above the three-month LIBOR rate, reset quarterly. Retired during the first quarter of 2013.		—		5,155		—		5,155
Subordinated debentures, issued in 2006, due 2036, fixed rate of 6.75% during the first five years and at a floating rate of 1.85% above the three-month LIBOR rate, reset quarterly, thereafter, currently callable without penalty		3,093		3,093		3,093		3,093

Total	$	3,093	$	28,867	$	3,093	$	28,867

The trust preferred securities are tax-advantaged issues that qualify for Tier 1 capital treatment subject to certain limitations. Distributions on these securities are included in interest expense. Each of the trusts is a statutory business trust organized for the sole purpose of issuing trust securities and investing the proceeds in our subordinated debentures, the sole asset of each trust. The trust preferred securities of each trust represent preferred beneficial interests in the assets of the respective trusts and are subject to mandatory redemption upon payment of the subordinated debentures held by the trust. We wholly own the common securities of each trust. Each trust’s ability to pay amounts due on the trust preferred securities is solely dependent upon our making payment on the related subordinated debentures. Our obligations under the subordinated securities and other relevant trust agreements, in aggregate, constitute a full and unconditional guarantee by us of each respective trust’s obligations under the trust securities issued by each respective trust.

Presently, the funds raised from the trust preferred offerings qualify as Tier 1 capital for regulatory purposes, subject to the applicable limit, with the balance qualifying as Tier 2 capital.

The Company currently holds a $3.1 million trust preferred security which is currently callable without penalty based on the terms of the specific agreement.

During the first quarter of 2013, the Company made the election to pay off $25.8 million of subordinated debentures which had previously been approved by the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis. The Company is currently evaluating whether to pay off the remaining $3.1 million subordinated debenture currently at a floating rate of ~~2.13%~~2.12% during 2013.

The following is a summary of the components of the provision (benefit) for income taxes for the ~~three-month period~~three and six-month periods ended ~~March 31:~~June 30:


	Three Months Ended March 31,					Three Months Ended June 30,					Six Months Ended June 30,
	2013		2012			2013			2012		2013		2012
	(In thousands)					(In thousands)
Current:
Federal	$	2,494	$	6,935		$	8,719		$	5,777	$	11,213	$	12,712
State		501		1,042			1,720			1,359		2,221		2,401

Total current		2,995		7,977			10,439			7,136		13,434		15,113

Deferred:
Federal		5,814		(187	)		(148	)		1,526		5,666		1,339
State		1,154		(37	)		(9	)		303		1,145		266

Total deferred		6,968		(224	)		(157	)		1,829		6,811		1,605

Provision for income taxes	$	9,963	$	7,753		$	10,282		$	8,965	$	20,245	$	16,718

The reconciliation between the statutory federal income tax rate and effective income tax rate is as follows for the ~~three-month period~~three and six-month periods ended ~~March 31:~~June 30:


	Three Months Ended
	March 31,						Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2013			2012			2013			2012			2013			2012
Statutory federal income tax rate		35.00	%		35.00	%		35.00	%		35.00	%		35.00	%		35.00	%
Effect of nontaxable interest income		(2.12	)		(2.71	)		(2.04	)		(2.50	)		(2.08	)		(2.60	)
Cash value of life insurance		(0.20	)		(0.40	)		(0.21	)		(0.31	)		(0.20	)		(0.35	)
State income taxes, net of federal benefit		3.91			2.93			3.98			4.42			3.95			3.71
Other		(0.38	)		0.02			0.07			0.05			(0.16	)		0.03

Effective income tax rate		36.21	%		34.84	%		36.80	%		36.66	%		36.51	%		35.79	%

The types of temporary differences between the tax basis of assets and liabilities and their financial reporting amounts that give rise to deferred income tax assets and liabilities, and their approximate tax effects, are as follows:


	March 31, 2013		December 31, 2012		June 30, 2013		December 31, 2012
	(In thousands)				(In thousands)
Deferred tax assets:
Allowance for loan losses	$	18,044	$	19,999	$	16,383	$	19,999
Deferred compensation		1,254		1,331		1,479		1,331
Stock options		280		231		284		231
Real estate owned		8,915		9,211		8,591		9,211
Loan discounts		40,553		51,946		39,414		51,946
Tax basis premium/discount on acquisitions		21,813		23,914		21,559		23,914
Deposits		400		485		348		485
Other		5,311		7,239		5,442		7,239

Gross deferred tax assets		96,570		114,356		93,500		114,356

Deferred tax liabilities:
Accelerated depreciation on premises and equipment		1,269		377		1,226		377
Unrealized gain on securities		6,870		7,747		1,279		7,747
Core deposit intangibles		1,251		1,506		998		1,506
Indemnification asset		44,524		54,009		41,551		54,009
FHLB dividends		892		889		894		889
Other		857		2,830		897		2,830

Gross deferred tax liabilities		55,663		67,358		46,845		67,358

Net deferred tax assets	$	40,907	$	46,998	$	46,655	$	46,998

On April 18, 2013 at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders of the Company, the shareholders approved, as proposed in the Proxy Statement, an amendment to the Company’s Restated Articles of Incorporation to increase the number of authorized shares of common stock from 50,000,000 to 100,000,000.

On April 18, 2013, our Board of Directors declared a two-for-one stock split to be paid in the form of a 100% stock dividend on June 12, 2013 (the “Payment Date”) to shareholders of record at the close of business on May 22, 2013. The additional shares were distributed by the Company’s transfer agent, Computershare, and the Company’s common stock began trading on a split-adjusted basis on the NASDAQ Global Select Market on or about June 13, 2013. The stock split increased the Company’s total shares of common stock outstanding as of June 12, 2013 from 28,121,596 shares to 56,243,192 shares (split adjusted). All previously reported share and per share data included in filings subsequent to the Payment Date are restated to reflect the retroactive effect of this two-for-one stock split.

The Company has a stock option and performance incentive plan known as the Amended and Restated 2006 Stock Option and Performance Incentive Plan (“the Plan”). The purpose of the Plan is to attract and retain highly qualified officers, directors, key employees, and other persons, and to motivate those persons to improve our business results. The Plan provides for the granting of incentive nonqualified options to purchase stock or for the issuance of restricted shares up to ~~2,322,000~~4,644,000 shares (split adjusted) of common stock in the Company. ~~The~~At June 30, 2013, the Company has approximately ~~858,000~~1,625,000 shares of common stock remaining available for grants or issuance under the plan and approximately ~~1,325,000~~2,635,000 shares reserved for issuance of common stock.

The intrinsic value of the stock options outstanding and stock options vested at ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2013 was ~~$10.6~~$17.8 million and ~~$10.1~~$15.6 million, respectively. The intrinsic value of the stock options exercised during the three-month period ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2013 was approximately ~~$74,000.~~$62,000. The intrinsic value of the stock options exercised during the six-month period ended June 30, 2013 was approximately $136,000. Total unrecognized compensation cost, net of income tax benefit, related to non-vested awards, which are expected to be recognized over the vesting periods, was approximately ~~$424,000~~$662,000 as of ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2013. For the first ~~three~~six months of 2013, the Company has expensed ~~$27,000~~$67,500 for the non-vested awards.

The table below summarized the transactions under the Company’s stock option plans (split adjusted) at ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012 and changes during the ~~three-month~~six-month period and year then ended:


	For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2013					For the Year Ended December 31, 2012					For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2013					For the Year Ended December 31, 2012
	Shares (000)			Weighted Average Exercisable Price		Shares (000)			Weighted Average Exercisable Price		Shares (000)			Weighted Average Exercisable Price		Shares (000)			Weighted Average Exercisable Price
Outstanding, beginning of year		435		$	13.32		569		$	11.36		871		$	6.66		1,138		$	5.68
Granted		35			34.50		45			26.25		150			18.23		90			13.13
Forfeited		—			—		(1	)		9.29		—			—		(2	)		4.65
Exercised		(3	)		14.94		(178	)		10.33		(12	)		6.76		(355	)		5.17

Outstanding, end of period		467			14.90		435			13.32		1,009			8.38		871			6.66

Exercisable, end of period		395		$	12.10		383		$	11.72		786		$	6.05		766		$	5.86

Stock-based compensation expense for stock-based compensation awards granted is based on the grant date fair value. For stock option awards, the fair value is estimated at the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. This model requires the input of highly subjective assumptions, changes to which can materially affect the fair value estimate. Additionally, there may be other factors that would otherwise have a significant effect on the value of employee stock options granted but are not considered by the model. Accordingly, while management believes that the Black-Scholes option-pricing model provides a reasonable estimate of fair value, the model does not necessarily provide the best single measure of fair value for the Company’s employee stock options. The weighted-average fair value of options granted during the ~~three-months~~six-months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2013 was ~~$6.37.~~$3.32 per share (split adjusted). The weighted-average fair value of options granted during the year ended December 31, 2012 was ~~$7.18.~~$3.59 per share (split adjusted). The fair value of each option granted is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model based on the weighted-average assumptions for expected dividend yield, expected stock price volatility, risk-free interest rate, and expected life of options granted.


	For the Three Months Ended			For the Year Ended			For the Six Months Ended			For the Year Ended
	March 31, 2013			December 31, 2012			June 30, 2013			December 31, 2012
Expected dividend yield		1.51	%		1.52	%		1.54	%		1.52	%
Expected stock price volatility		20.90	%		30.56	%		20.93	%		30.56	%
Risk-free interest rate		1.26	%		1.47	%		1.19	%		1.47	%
Expected life of options		6.5 years			6.5 years			6.5 years			6.5 years

The following is a summary of currently outstanding and exercisable options (split adjusted) at ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2013:

The table below summarized the activity for the Company’s restricted stock issued and outstanding (split adjusted) at ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012 and changes during the period and year then ended:


	As of March 31, 2013			As of December 31, 2012			As of June 30, 2013			As of December 31, 2012
	(in thousands)						(In thousands)
Beginning of year		135			49			269			97
Issued		11			104			35			208
Vested		(14	)		(18	)		(32	)		(36	)
Forfeited		(7	)		—			(16	)		—

End of period		125			135			256			269

Amount of expense for three months and twelve months ended, respectively	$	209		$	780
Amount of expense for six months and twelve months ended, respectively							$	477		$	780

On August 2, 2012, ~~104,000~~208,000 shares (split adjusted) of restricted common stock were issued to our named executive officers and certain other employees of the Company. These shares include ~~43,000~~86,000 shares (split adjusted) subject to time vesting (“Restricted Shares”) and ~~61,000~~122,000 shares (split adjusted) subject to performance based vesting (“Performance Shares”).

The Restricted Shares will “cliff” vest on the third annual anniversary of the grant date. The Performance Shares will “cliff” vest on the third annual anniversary of the date that the performance goal is met. The performance goal will be met as of the end of the calendar quarter when the Company has averaged ~~$0.625~~$0.3125 diluted earnings per share (split adjusted) for four consecutive quarters or ~~$2.50~~$1.25 total diluted earnings per share (split adjusted) over a period of four consecutive quarters. The Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors will have final approval to determine whether the diluted earnings per share performance goal has been met and will exclude one-time and non-reoccurring gains in calculating the applicable diluted earnings per share.

On January 18, 2013, ~~9,000~~18,000 shares (split adjusted) of restricted common stock were issued to each non-employee member of our Board of Directors and ~~2,000~~4,000 shares (split adjusted) of restricted common stock to a regional president of our bank subsidiary for a total issuance of ~~11,000~~22,000 shares (split adjusted) of restricted common stock. The restricted stock issued will vest equally each year over three years beginning on the first anniversary of the issuance.

On June 4, 2013, 12,966 shares (split adjusted) of restricted common stock were issued to a regional president of our bank subsidiary. Of these issued shares, 9,666 shares (split adjusted) will vest equally each year over three years beginning on the first anniversary of the issuance. The remaining 3,000 shares (split adjusted) will be subject to the previously discussed performance-based vesting.

The Company did not utilize a portion of its previously approved stock repurchase program during 2013. This program authorized the repurchase of ~~1,188,000~~2,376,000 shares (split adjusted) of the Company’s common stock. Shares repurchased to date under the program total ~~755,448 shares.~~1,510,896 shares (split adjusted). The remaining balance available for repurchase is ~~432,552~~865,104 shares (split adjusted) at ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2013.

The table below shows the components of non-interest expense for the three and six months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2013 and 2012:


	Three Months Ended				Three Months Ended				Six Months Ended
	March 31,				June 30,				June 30,
	2013		2012		2013		2012		2013		2012
	(In thousands)				(In thousands)
Salaries and employee benefits	$	12,952	$	11,386	$	12,957	$	11,903	$	25,909	$	23,289
Occupancy and equipment		3,594		3,431		3,894		3,552		7,488		6,983
Data processing expense		1,510		1,091		1,231		1,371		2,741		2,462
Other operating expenses:
Advertising		693		460		120		904		813		1,364
Merger and acquisition expenses		28		1,692		1		—		29		1,692
Amortization of intangibles		802		630		802		694		1,604		1,324
Electronic banking expense		863		793		960		728		1,823		1,521
Directors’ fees		190		212		210		193		400		405
Due from bank service charges		133		116		168		159		301		275
FDIC and state assessment		630		638		677		516		1,307		1,154
Insurance		566		401		555		424		1,121		825
Legal and accounting		322		322		394		287		716		609
Other professional fees		473		498		490		354		963		852
Operating supplies		343		264		332		291		675		555
Postage		207		221		231		240		438		461
Telephone		303		246		291		276		594		522
Other expense		2,254		1,985		2,542		2,532		4,796		4,517

Total other operating expenses		7,807		8,478		7,773		7,598		15,580		16,076

Total non-interest expense	$	25,863	$	24,386	$	25,855	$	24,424	$	51,718	$	48,810

The Company’s primary market areas are in Central Arkansas, North Central Arkansas, Southern Arkansas, Central Florida, Southwest Florida, the Florida Panhandle, the Florida Keys (Monroe County) and South Alabama. The Company primarily grants loans to customers located within these geographical areas unless the borrower has an established relationship with the Company.

The diversity of the Company’s economic base tends to provide a stable lending environment. Although the Company has a loan portfolio that is diversified in both industry and geographic area, a substantial portion of its debtors’ ability to honor their contracts is dependent upon real estate values, tourism demand and the economic conditions prevailing in its market areas.

Accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America require disclosure of certain significant estimates and current vulnerabilities due to certain concentrations. Estimates related to the allowance for loan losses and certain concentrations of credit risk are reflected in Note 6, while deposit concentrations are reflected in Note 9.

Although the Company has a diversified loan portfolio, at ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, non-covered commercial real estate loans represented ~~56.4%~~56.3% and 56.0% of non-covered loans and ~~246.6%~~246.8% and 253.4% of total stockholders’ equity, respectively. Non-covered residential real estate loans represented ~~28.4%~~27.8% and 29.1% of non-covered loans and ~~123.9%~~121.7% and 131.7% of total stockholders’ equity at ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively.

The current economic environment presents financial institutions with unprecedented circumstances and challenges which in some cases have resulted in large declines in the fair values of investments and other assets, constraints on liquidity and significant credit quality problems, including severe volatility in the valuation of real estate and other collateral supporting loans. The financial statements have been prepared using values and information currently available to the Company.

Given the volatility of current economic conditions, the values of assets and liabilities recorded in the financial statements could change rapidly, resulting in material future adjustments in asset values, the allowance for loan losses and capital that could negatively impact the Company’s ability to meet regulatory capital requirements and maintain sufficient liquidity.

In the ordinary course of business, the Company makes various commitments and incurs certain contingent liabilities to fulfill the financing needs of its customers. These commitments and contingent liabilities include lines of credit and commitments to extend credit and issue standby letters of credit. The Company applies the same credit policies and standards as it does in the lending process when making these commitments. The collateral obtained is based on the assessed creditworthiness of the borrower.

At ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, commitments to extend credit of ~~$406.0~~$402.1 million and $407.1 million, respectively, were outstanding. A percentage of these balances are participated out to other banks; therefore, the Company can call on the participating banks to fund future draws. Since some of these commitments are expected to expire without being drawn upon, the total commitment amount does not necessarily represent future cash requirements.

Outstanding standby letters of credit are contingent commitments issued by the Company, generally to guarantee the performance of a customer in third-party borrowing arrangements. The term of the guarantee is dependent upon the credit worthiness of the borrower some of which are long-term. The amount of collateral obtained, if deemed necessary, is based on management’s credit evaluation of the counterparty. Collateral held varies but may include accounts receivable, inventory, property, plant and equipment, commercial real estate and residential real estate. Management uses the same credit policies in granting lines of credit as it does for on-balance-sheet instruments. The maximum amount of future payments the Company could be required to make under these guarantees at ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, is $16.5 million and $16.4 million, respectively.

The Company and/or its subsidiary bank have various unrelated legal proceedings, most of which involve loan foreclosure activity pending, which, in the aggregate, are not expected to have a material adverse effect on the financial position and results of operations of the Company.

The Bank is subject to a legal limitation on dividends that can be paid to the parent company without prior approval of the applicable regulatory agencies. Arkansas bank regulators have specified that the maximum dividend limit state banks may pay to the parent company without prior approval is 75% of the current year earnings plus 75% of the retained net earnings of the preceding year. Since the Bank is also under supervision of the Federal Reserve, it is further limited if the total of all dividends declared in any calendar year by the Bank exceeds the Bank’s net profits to date for that year combined with its retained net profits for the preceding two years. During the first ~~quarter~~six months of 2013, the Company requested approximately ~~$13.9~~$27.6 million in dividends from its banking subsidiary. This dividend is equal to approximately 75% of the current year earnings December 2012 through ~~February~~May 2013 from its banking subsidiary. The Company plans to continue to request dividends from its banking subsidiary during the remainder of 2013.

The Federal Reserve Board’s risk-based capital guidelines include the definitions for (1) a well-capitalized institution, (2) an adequately-capitalized institution, and (3) and undercapitalized institution. The criteria for a well-capitalized institution are: a 5% “Tier 1 leverage capital” ratio, a 6% “Tier 1 risk-based capital” ratio, and a 10% “total risk-based capital” ratio. As of ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2013, the Bank met the capital standards for a well-capitalized institution. The Company’s “Tier 1 leverage capital” ratio, “Tier 1 risk-based capital” ratio, and “total risk-based capital” ratio were ~~10.4%~~10.78%, ~~13.8%~~14.04%, and ~~15.0%~~15.29%, respectively, as of ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2013.

The following is summary of the Company’s additional cash flow information during the ~~three-month~~six-month periods ended:


	Six Months Ended June 30,
	2013		2012
	(in thousands)
Interest paid	$	7,373	$	12,985
Income taxes paid		5,550		17,170
Assets acquired by foreclosure		5,569		15,679

Fair value is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. Fair value measurements must maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable ~~inputs when measuring fair value.~~inputs. There is a hierarchy of three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value:

Available-for-sale securities are the only material instruments valued on a recurring basis which are held by the Company at fair value. The Company does not have any Level 1 securities. Primarily all of the Company’s securities are considered to be Level 2 securities. These Level 2 securities consist primarily of U.S. government-sponsored enterprises, mortgage-backed securities plus state and political subdivisions. For these securities, the Company obtains fair value measurements from an independent pricing service. The fair value measurements consider observable data that may include dealer quotes, market spreads, cash flows, the U.S. Treasury yield curve, live trading levels, trade execution data, market consensus prepayment speeds, credit information and the bond’s terms and conditions, among other things. As of ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, Level 3 securities were immaterial. In addition, there were no material transfers between hierarchy levels during 2013 and 2012.

The Corporation reviews the prices supplied by the independent pricing service, as well as their underlying pricing methodologies, for reasonableness and to ensure such prices are aligned with traditional pricing matrices. In general, the Company does not purchase investment portfolio securities with complicated structures. Pricing for the Company’s investment securities is fairly generic and is easily obtained.

Impaired loans that are collateral dependent are the only material financial assets valued on a non-recurring basis which are held by the Company at fair value. Loan impairment is reported when full payment under the loan terms is not expected. Impaired loans are carried at the net realizable value of the collateral if the loan is collateral dependent. A portion of the allowance for loan losses is allocated to impaired loans if the value of such loans is deemed to be less than the unpaid balance. If these allocations cause the allowance for loan losses to require an increase, such increase is reported as a component of the provision for loan losses. The fair value of loans with specific allocated losses was ~~$83.9~~$81.2 million and $97.8 million as of ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively. This valuation is considered Level 3, consisting of appraisals of underlying collateral. The Company reversed approximately ~~$129,000~~$177,000 and ~~$50,000~~$72,000 of accrued interest receivable when non-covered impaired loans were put on non-accrual status during the three months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively. The Company reversed approximately $306,000 and $121,000 of accrued interest receivable when non-covered impaired loans were put on non-accrual status during the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

Foreclosed assets held for sale are the only material non-financial assets valued on a non-recurring basis which are held by the Company at fair value, less estimated costs to sell. At foreclosure, if the fair value, less estimated costs to sell, of the real estate acquired is less than the Company’s recorded investment in the related loan, a write-down is recognized through a charge to the allowance for loan losses. Additionally, valuations are periodically performed by management and any subsequent reduction in value is recognized by a charge to income. The fair value of foreclosed assets held for sale is estimated using Level 3 inputs based on appraisals of underlying collateral. As of ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, the fair value of foreclosed assets held for sale not covered by loss share, less estimated costs to sell was ~~$18.9~~$16.0 million and $20.4 million, respectively.

The significant unobservable (Level 3) inputs used in the fair value measurement of collateral for collateral-dependent impaired loans and foreclosed assets primarily relate to customized discounting criteria applied to the customer’s reported amount of collateral. The amount of the collateral discount depends upon the condition and marketability of the underlying collateral. As the ~~Corporation’s~~Company’s primary objective in the event of default would be to monetize the collateral to settle the outstanding balance of the loan, less marketable collateral would receive a larger discount. During the reported periods, collateral discounts ranged from 20% to 50% for commercial and residential real estate collateral.

The following methods and assumptions were used by the Company in estimating fair values of financial instruments as disclosed in these notes:

Cash and cash equivalents and federal funds sold — For these short-term instruments, the carrying amount is a reasonable estimate of fair value.

Loans receivable not covered by loss share, net of non-covered impaired loans and allowance— For variable-rate loans that reprice frequently and with no significant change in credit risk, fair values are assumed to approximate the carrying amounts. The fair values for fixed-rate loans are estimated using discounted cash flow analysis, based on interest rates currently being offered for loans with similar terms to borrowers of similar credit quality. Loan fair value estimates include judgments regarding future expected loss experience and risk characteristics.

Loans receivable covered by FDIC loss share, net of allowance— Fair values for loans are based on a discounted cash flow methodology that considered factors including the type of loan and related collateral, classification status, fixed or variable interest rate, term of loan, ~~and~~ whether or not the loan was amortizing and current discount rates. Loans were grouped together according to similar characteristics and were treated in the aggregate when applying various valuation techniques. The discount rates used for loans are based on current market rates for new originations of comparable loans and include adjustments for liquidity concerns. The discount rate does not include a factor for credit losses as that has been included in the estimated cash flows.

FDIC indemnification asset— Although this asset is a contractual receivable from the FDIC, there is no effective interest rate. The Bank will collect this asset over the next several years. The amount ultimately collected will depend on the timing and amount of collections and charge-offs on the acquired assets covered by the loss sharing agreement. While this asset was recorded at its estimated fair value at acquisition date, it is not practicable to complete a fair value analysis on a quarterly or annual basis. This would involve preparing a fair value analysis of the entire portfolio of loans and foreclosed assets covered by the loss sharing agreement on a quarterly or annual basis in order to estimate the fair value of the FDIC indemnification asset.

Accrued interest receivable — The carrying amount of accrued interest receivable approximates its fair value.

Deposits and securities sold under agreements to repurchase — The fair values of demand, savings deposits and securities sold under agreements to repurchase are, by definition, equal to the amount payable on demand and therefore approximate their carrying amounts. The fair values for time deposits are estimated using a discounted cash flow calculation that utilizes interest rates currently being offered on time deposits with similar contractual maturities.

FHLB and other borrowed funds — For short-term instruments, the carrying amount is a reasonable estimate of fair value. The fair value of long-term debt is estimated based on the current rates available to the Company for debt with similar terms and remaining maturities.

Accrued interest payable — The carrying amount of accrued interest payable approximates its fair value.

Subordinated debentures — The fair value of subordinated debentures is estimated using the rates that would be charged for subordinated debentures of similar remaining maturities.

Commitments to extend credit, letters of credit and lines of credit— The fair value of commitments is estimated using the fees currently charged to enter into similar agreements, taking into account the remaining terms of the agreements and the present creditworthiness of the counterparties. For fixed rate loan commitments, fair value also considers the difference between current levels of interest rates and the committed rates. The fair values of letters of credit and lines of credit are based on fees currently charged for similar agreements or on the estimated cost to terminate or otherwise settle the obligations with the counterparties at the reporting date. The fair value of these commitments is not material.

The following table presents the estimated fair values of the Company’s financial instruments. The fair values of certain of these instruments were calculated by discounting expected cash flows, which involves significant judgments by management and uncertainties. Fair value is the estimated amount at which financial assets or liabilities could be exchanged in a current transaction between willing parties other than in a forced or liquidation sale. Because no market exists for certain of these financial instruments and because management does not intend to sell these financial instruments, the Company does not know whether the fair values shown below represent values at which the respective financial instruments could be sold individually or in the aggregate.


	March 31, 2013					June 30, 2013
	Carrying					Carrying
	Amount		Fair Value		Level	Amount		Fair Value		Level
	(In thousands)					(In thousands)
Financial assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	302,357	$	302,357	1	$	172,724	$	172,724		1
Federal funds sold		2,850		2,850	1		2,475		2,475		1
Loans receivable not covered by loss share, net of non-covered impaired loans and allowance		2,188,877		2,124,347	3		2,217,550		2,193,072		3
Loans receivable covered by FDIC loss share, net of allowance		355,036		355,036	3
Loans receivable covered by FDIC loss share							328,850		328,850		3
FDIC indemnification asset		126,275		126,275	3		116,071		116,071		3
Accrued interest receivable		14,367		14,367	1		14,424		14,424		1
Financial liabilities:
Deposits:
Demand and non-interest bearing	$	717,830	$	717,830	1	$	733,374	$	733,374		1
Savings and interest-bearing transaction accounts		1,810,957		1,810,957	1		1,735,280		1,735,280		1
Time deposits		936,649		936,216	3		856,581		854,961		3
Federal funds purchased		—		—	N/A		—		—		N/A
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase		77,194		77,194	1		73,461		73,461		1
FHLB and other borrowed funds		130,369		138,236	2
FHLB borrowed funds							130,251		135,698		2
Accrued interest payable		1,055		1,055	1		913		913		1
Subordinated debentures		3,093		3,099	3		3,093		3,100		3

   December 31, 2012
   Carrying
   Amount    Fair Value    Level
   (In thousands)
Financial assets:

Cash and cash equivalents
   $ 231,855       $ 231,855       1
Federal funds sold
   17,148       17,148       1
Loans receivable not covered by loss share, net of non-covered impaired loans and allowance
   2,188,253       2,202,859       3
Loans receivable covered by FDIC loss share
   379,422       379,422       3
FDIC indemnification asset
   139,646       139,646       3
Accrued interest receivable
   16,305       16,305       1
Financial liabilities:

Deposits:

Demand and non-interest bearing
   $ 666,414       $ 666,414       1
Savings and interest-bearing transaction accounts
   1,784,047       1,784,047       1
Time deposits
   1,032,991       1,037,235       3
Federal funds purchased
   —         —         N/A
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase
   66,278       66,278       1
FHLB and other borrowed funds
   130,388       139,654       2
Accrued interest payable
   1,243       1,243       1
Subordinated debentures
   28,867       28,911       3

In October 2012, the FASB issued an update, ASU 2012-06, “Business Combinations (Topic 805): Subsequent Accounting for an Indemnification Asset Recognized at the Acquisition Date as a Result of a Government-Assisted Acquisition of a Financial Institution”, to address the diversity in treatment with respect to indemnification assets recognized in connection with a government-assisted acquisition of a financial institution and the related asset subject to indemnification. When a reporting entity recognizes an indemnification asset as a result of a government-assisted acquisition of a financial institution, a change in the cash flows expected to be collected on the indemnified asset will result in a change in the value of such asset and should also result in a change in the respective indemnification asset. The update clarifies that the reporting entity should subsequently account for the change in the measurement of the indemnification asset on the same basis as the change in the assets subject to indemnification. Any amortization of changes in value should be limited to the contractual term of the indemnification agreement, which is the lesser of the term of the indemnification agreement or the remaining life of the indemnified assets. The new authoritative guidance became effective for reporting periods after January 1, 2013. ASU 2012-06 did not impact or change the ~~first quarter 2013~~ impairment tests or ~~results;~~results for the first half of 2013; the Company was already following the guidance provided for in this new standard.

In February 2013, the FASB issued an update, ASU 2013-02, “Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Reporting Items Reclassified Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income”, which requires disclosure of amounts reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income in their entirety, by component, on the face of the statement of comprehensive income or in the notes to the financial statements. Amounts that are not required to be classified in their entirety to net income must be cross-referenced to other disclosures that provide additional detail. ASU 2013-02 is effective prospectively for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after January 1, 2013, and did not have an impact on the Company’s financial position or results of operations.

Presently, the Company is not aware of any changes from the Financial Accounting Standards Board that will have a material impact on the Company’s present or future financial statements.

On April 18, 2013, our Board of Directors declared a two-for-one stock split to be paid in the form of a 100% stock dividend on June 12, 2013 (the “Payment Date”) to shareholders of record at the close of business on May 22, 2013. The additional shares will be distributed by the Company’s transfer agent, Computershare, and the Company’s common stock is expected to begin trading on a split-adjusted basis on the NASDAQ Global Select Market on or about June 13, 2013. The stock split is expected to increase the Company’s total shares of common stock outstanding as of April 18, 2013 from approximately 28,116,000 shares to approximately 56,232,000 shares. All previously reported share and per share data included in filings subsequent to the Payment Date will be restated to reflect the retroactive effect of this two-for-one stock split.

We have reviewed the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet of Home BancShares, Inc. (the Company) as of ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2013, and the related condensed consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income for the three-month and six-month periods ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, and condensed consolidated statements of stockholders’ equity and cash flows for the ~~three-month~~six-month periods ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2013 and 2012. These interim financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management.

We conducted our reviews in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). A review of interim financial information consists principally of applying analytical procedures to financial data and making inquiries of persons responsible for financial and accounting matters. It is substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, the objective of which is the expression of an opinion regarding the financial statements taken as a whole. Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion.

Based on our reviews, we are not aware of any material modifications that should be made to the condensed consolidated financial statements referred to above for them to be in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

We have previously audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2012, and the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, stockholders’ equity and cash flows for the year then ended (not presented herein); and in our report dated March 4, 2013, we expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements. In our opinion, the information set forth in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2012, is fairly stated, in all material respects, in relation to the consolidated balance sheet from which it has been derived.

Item 2:

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following discussion should be read in conjunction with our Form 10-K, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 4, 2013, which includes the audited financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2012.Unless the context requires otherwise, the terms “Company”, “us”, “we”, and “our” refer to Home BancShares, Inc. on a consolidated basis.

We are a bank holding company headquartered in Conway, Arkansas, offering a broad array of financial services through our wholly owned bank subsidiary, Centennial Bank. As of ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2013, we had, on a consolidated basis, total assets of ~~$4.23~~$4.09 billion, loans receivable, net of ~~$2.62~~$2.63 billion, total deposits of ~~$3.47~~$3.33 billion, and stockholders’ equity of ~~$528.4~~$533.5 million.

We generate most of our revenue from interest on loans and investments, service charges, and mortgage banking income. Deposits and FHLB borrowed funds are our primary sources of funding. Our largest expenses are interest on our funding sources and salaries and related employee benefits. We measure our performance by calculating our return on average common equity, return on average assets, and net interest margin. We also measure our performance by our efficiency ratio, which is calculated by dividing non-interest expense less amortization of core deposit intangibles by the sum of net interest income on a tax equivalent basis and non-interest income.


							Key Financial Measures
	As of or for the Three Months						As of or for the Three Months						As of or for the Six Months
	Ended March 31,						Ended June 30,						Ended June 30,
	2013			2012			2013			2012			2013			2012
	(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)						(Dollars in thousands, except per share data⁽²⁾)
Total assets	$	4,225,507		$	4,147,952		$	4,091,337		$	4,056,405		$	4,091,337		$	4,056,405
Loans receivable not covered by loss share		2,309,146			2,046,108			2,339,242			2,035,487			2,339,242			2,035,487
Loans receivable covered by FDIC loss share		358,669			455,435			329,802			432,422			329,802			432,422
Allowance for loan losses		45,935			51,014			41,450			56,511			41,450			56,511
FDIC claims receivable		42,885			25,229			27,550			40,912			27,550			40,912
Total deposits		3,465,436			3,380,399			3,325,235			3,293,529			3,325,235			3,293,529
Total stockholders’ equity		528,395			480,535			533,510			495,435			533,510			495,435
Net income		17,548			14,498			17,659			15,490			35,207			29,988
Basic earnings per common share		0.62			0.51			0.32			0.28			0.63			0.53
Diluted earnings per common share		0.62			0.51			0.31			0.27			0.62			0.53
Diluted earnings per common share excluding intangible amortization (1)		0.64			0.52			0.32			0.28			0.64			0.54
Annualized net interest margin – FTE		5.15	%		4.65	%		5.18	%		4.65	%		5.16	%		4.65	%
Efficiency ratio		46.03			49.75			44.98			46.22			45.50			47.92
Annualized return on average assets		1.70			1.52			1.71			1.53			1.70			1.53
Annualized return on average common equity		13.68			12.21			13.27			12.80			13.47			12.51

Results of Operations for Three Months Ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2013 and 2012

Our net income increased ~~$3.0~~$2.2 million or ~~21.0%~~14.0% to ~~$17.5~~$17.7 million for the three-month period ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2013, from ~~$14.5~~$15.5 million for the same period in 2012. On a diluted earnings per common share basis, our earnings were ~~$0.62~~$0.31 and ~~$0.51~~$0.27 (split adjusted) for the three-month periods ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively. The ~~$3.0~~$2.2 million increase in net income is primarily associated with the additional net interest income and other non-interest income resulting from our 2012 acquisitions of ~~Vision,~~ Heritage and ~~Premier and~~Premier. Additionally, there was a reduction in ~~merger expenses by $1.7 million.~~the provision for loan losses of $483,000 in second quarter of 2013 when compared to the second quarter of 2012. These improvements were partially offset by a modest increase in the costs associated with the asset growth from our acquisitions. ~~There was no provision for loan losses in first quarter of 2012 and 2013.~~

Impairment testing on the estimated cash flows of ~~the~~ covered loans during the first quarter of 2013 were determined to have a materially projected credit improvement. As a result of this improvement, the Company will recognize approximately $15.6 million as an adjustment to yield over the weighted average life of the loans with ~~$2.2~~$2.0 million of this amount being recognized during the ~~first~~second quarter of 2013. Improvements in credit quality decrease the basis in the related indemnification asset and increase our FDIC true up liability. This positive event will reduce the indemnification asset by approximately $12.5 million of which ~~$2.1~~$2.0 million was recognized for the ~~first~~second quarter of 2013, and increase our FDIC true-up liability by $1.6 million of which $57,000 was recognized for the ~~first~~second quarter of 2013. The $12.5 million will be amortized over the weighted average life of the shared-loss agreement. This amortization will be shown as a reduction to FDIC indemnification non-interest income. The $1.6 million will be expensed over the remaining true-up measurement date as other non-interest expense.

Our annualized return on average assets was ~~1.70%~~1.71% for the three months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2013, compared to ~~1.52%~~1.53% for the same period in 2012. Our annualized return on average common equity was ~~13.68%~~13.27% for the three months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2013, compared to ~~12.21%~~12.80% for the same period in 2012, respectively. The improvements in our ratios from 2012 to 2013 are consistent with the previously discussed changes in earnings for the three months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2013, compared to the same period in 2012.

Our annualized net interest margin, on a fully taxable equivalent basis, was ~~5.15%~~5.18% for the three months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2013, compared to 4.65% for the same period in 2012. Our ability to improve pricing on interest bearing deposits combined with additional yield on FDIC loss sharing loans which more than offset the lower interest rates on newly originated loans in the loan portfolio during this historically low rate environment allowed the Company to expand net interest margin. Our acquisitions have helped improve the yield on the loan portfolio. For the three months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2013, the effective yield on non-covered loans and covered loans was ~~6.11%~~6.04% and ~~10.30%~~10.78%, respectively. Excluding the ~~$2.2~~$2.0 million of additional yield for the first quarter, the pro-forma effective yield on covered loans was ~~7.94%~~8.46%.

Our efficiency ratio was ~~46.03%~~44.98% for the three months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2013, compared to ~~49.75%~~46.22% for the same period in 2012. The improvement in the efficiency ratio is primarily associated with additional net interest income and other non-interest income resulting from our 2012 acquisitions of Heritage and Premier offset by a modest increase in costs associated with the asset growth from our acquisitions.

Our net income increased $5.2 million or 17.4% to $35.2 million for the six-month period ended June 30, 2013, from $30.0 million for the same period in 2012. On a diluted earnings per common share basis, our earnings were $0.62 and $0.53 (split adjusted) for the six-month periods ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively. The $5.2 million increase in net income is primarily associated with the additional net interest income and other non-interest income resulting from our 2012 acquisitions of Vision, Heritage and Premier and a reduction in merger expenses by $1.7 million. Additionally, there was a reduction in the provision for loan losses of $483,000 in the first six months of 2013 when compared to the first six months 2012. These improvements were partially offset by a modest increase in the costs associated with the asset growth from our acquisitions.

As discussed in the preceding section, impairment testing on the estimated cash flows of the covered loans during the first quarter of 2013 were determined to have a materially projected credit improvement. As a result of this impairment testing, the Company recognized $4.2 million as an adjustment to yield over the weighted average life of the loans during the first six months of 2013. Conversely, the indemnification asset was amortized by approximately $4.1 million and the FDIC true-up expense was increased by $114,000 during the first six months of 2013, respectively.

Our annualized return on average assets was 1.70% for the six months ended June 30, 2013, compared to 1.53% for the same period in 2012. Our annualized return on average common equity was 13.47% for the six months ended June 30, 2013, compared to 12.51% for the same period in 2012, respectively. The improvements in our ratios from 2012 to 2013 are consistent with the previously discussed changes in earnings for the six months ended June 30, 2013, compared to the same period in 2012.

Our annualized net interest margin, on a fully taxable equivalent basis, was 5.16% for the six months ended June 30, 2013, compared to 4.65% for the same period in 2012. Our ability to improve pricing on interest bearing deposits combined with additional yield on FDIC loss sharing loans which more than offset the lower interest rates on newly originated loans in the loan portfolio during this historically low rate environment allowed the Company to expand net interest margin. Our acquisitions have helped improve the yield on the loan portfolio. For the six months ended June 30, 2013, the effective yield on non-covered loans and covered loans was 6.08% and 10.53%, respectively. Excluding the $4.2 million of additional yield for 2013, the pro-forma effective yield on covered loans was 8.19%.

Our efficiency ratio was 45.50% for the six months ended June 30, 2013, compared to 47.92% for the same period in 2012. The improvement in the efficiency ratio is primarily associated with additional net interest income and other non-interest income resulting from our 2012 acquisitions of Vision, Heritage and Premier offset by a modest increase in costs associated with the asset growth from our acquisitions.

Financial Condition as of and for the Period Ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012

Our total assets as of ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2013 decreased ~~$16.6~~$150.8 million to ~~$4.23~~$4.09 billion from the $4.24 billion reported as of December 31, 2012. Our loan portfolio not covered by loss share ~~decreased~~increased by ~~$22.1~~$8.0 million to ~~$2.31~~$2.34 billion as of ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2013, from $2.33 billion as of December 31, 2012. Our loan portfolio covered by loss share decreased by ~~$26.2~~$55.1 million, an annualized reduction of ~~27.6%~~28.9%, to ~~$358.7~~$329.8 million as of ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2013, from $384.9 million as of December 31, 2012. Stockholders’ equity increased ~~$12.9~~$18.0 million to ~~$528.4~~$533.5 million as of ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2013, compared to $515.5 million as of December 31, 2012. The annualized improvement in stockholders’ equity for the first ~~three~~six months of 2012 was ~~10.2%~~7.1%. The decrease in covered loans is primarily associated with ~~low loan demand~~pay-downs and payoffs in our ~~non-covered and~~ covered loan ~~portfolios.~~portfolio. The increase in stockholders’ equity is primarily associated with the ~~$16.2~~$25.2 million of comprehensive income less the ~~$3.7~~$7.9 million of dividends paid for 2013.

As of ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2013, our non-performing non-covered loans ~~decreased~~increased to ~~$25.8~~$29.3 million, or ~~1.12%~~1.25%, of total non-covered loans from $27.3 million, or 1.17%, of total non-covered loans as of December 31, 2012. The allowance for loan losses for non-covered loans as a percent of non-performing non-covered loans decreased to ~~164.15%~~138.16% as of ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2013, compared to 165.62% as of December 31, 2012. Non-performing non-covered loans in Arkansas were ~~$9.6~~$8.2 million at ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2013 compared to $12.1 million as of December 31, 2012. Non-performing non-covered loans in Florida were ~~$16.2~~$21.1 million at ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2013 compared to $15.2 million as of December 31, 2012. Non-performing non-covered loans in Alabama were $12,000 at June 30, 2013. As of ~~March 31, 2013 and~~ December 31, 2012, no loans in Alabama were non-performing.

As of ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2013, our non-performing non-covered assets improved to ~~$44.9~~$45.5 million, or ~~1.21%~~1.26%, of total non-covered assets from $47.8 million, or 1.30%, of total non-covered assets as of December 31, 2012. Non-performing non-covered assets in Arkansas were ~~$21.9~~$18.8 million at ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2013 compared to $24.6 million as of December 31, 2012. Non-performing non-covered assets in Florida were ~~$23.0~~$26.6 million at ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2013 compared to $23.2 million as of December 31, 2012. Non-performing non-covered assets in Alabama were ~~$17,000~~$12,000 at ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2013. As of December 31, 2012, no assets in Alabama were non-performing.

Overview. We prepare our consolidated financial statements based on the selection of certain accounting policies, generally accepted accounting principles and customary practices in the banking industry. These policies, in certain areas, require us to make significant estimates and assumptions. Our accounting policies are described in detail in the notes to our consolidated financial statements in Note 1 of the audited consolidated financial statements included in our Form 10-K, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

We consider a policy critical if (i) the accounting estimate requires assumptions about matters that are highly uncertain at the time of the accounting estimate; and (ii) different estimates that could reasonably have been used in the current period, or changes in the accounting estimate that are reasonably likely to occur from period to period, would have a material impact on our financial statements. Using these criteria, we believe that the accounting policies most critical to us are those associated with our lending practices, including the accounting for the allowance for loan losses, acquisition accounting for covered loans and related indemnification asset, investments, foreclosed assets held for sale, intangible assets, income taxes and stock options.

Investments. Securities available-for-sale are reported at fair value with unrealized holding gains and losses reported as a separate component of stockholders’ equity and other comprehensive income (loss), net of taxes. Securities that are held as available-for-sale are used as a part of our asset/liability management strategy. Securities that may be sold in response to interest rate changes, changes in prepayment risk, the need to increase regulatory capital, and other similar factors are classified as available-for-sale.

Loans Receivable Not Covered by Loss Share and Allowance for Loan Losses. ~~Substantially~~Except for loans acquired during our acquisitions, substantially all of our loans receivable not covered by loss share are reported at their outstanding principal balance adjusted for any charge-offs, as it is management’s intent to hold them for the foreseeable future or until maturity or payoff, except for mortgage loans held for sale. Interest income on loans is accrued over the term of the loans based on the principal balance outstanding.

The allowance for loan losses is established through a provision for loan losses charged against income. The allowance represents an amount that, in management’s judgment, will be adequate to absorb probable credit losses on identifiable loans that may become uncollectible and probable credit losses inherent in the remainder of the loan portfolio. The amounts of provisions for loan losses are based on management’s analysis and evaluation of the loan portfolio for identification of problem credits, internal and external factors that may affect collectability, relevant credit exposure, particular risks inherent in different kinds of lending, current collateral values and other relevant factors.

The allowance consists of allocated and general components. The allocated component relates to loans that are classified as impaired. For those loans that are classified as impaired, an allowance is established when the discounted cash flows, or collateral value or observable market price of the impaired loan is lower than the carrying value of that loan. The general component covers non-classified loans and is based on historical charge-off experience and expected loss given default derived from the Bank’s internal risk rating process. Other adjustments may be made to the allowance for pools of loans after an assessment of internal or external influences on credit quality that are not fully reflected in the historical loss or risk rating data.

Loans considered impaired, under FASB ASC 310-10-35, are loans for which, based on current information and events, it is probable that the Company will be unable to collect all amounts due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. The Company applies this policy even if delays or shortfalls in payment are expected to be insignificant. The aggregate amount of impairment of loans is utilized in evaluating the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses and amount of provisions thereto. Losses on impaired loans are charged against the allowance for loan losses when in the process of collection it appears likely that such losses will be realized. The accrual of interest on impaired loans is discontinued when, in management’s opinion the collection of interest is doubtful, or generally when loans are 90 days or more past due. When accrual of interest is discontinued, all unpaid accrued interest is reversed. Interest income is subsequently recognized only to the extent cash payments are received in excess of principal due. Loans are returned to accrual status when all the principal and interest amounts contractually due are brought current and future payments are reasonably assured.

Groups of loans with similar risk characteristics are collectively evaluated for impairment based on the group’s historical loss experience adjusted for changes in trends, conditions and other relevant factors that affect repayment of the loans.

Loans are placed on non-accrual status when management believes that the borrower’s financial condition, after giving consideration to economic and business conditions and collection efforts, is such that collection of interest is doubtful, or generally when loans are 90 days or more past due. Loans are charged against the allowance for loan losses when management believes that the collectability of the principal is unlikely. Accrued interest related to non-accrual loans is generally charged against the allowance for loan losses when accrued in prior years and reversed from interest income if accrued in the current year. Interest income on non-accrual loans may be recognized to the extent cash payments are received, although the majority of payments received are usually applied to principal. Non-accrual loans are generally returned to accrual status when principal and interest payments are less than 90 days past due, the customer has made required payments for at least six months, and we reasonably expect to collect all principal and interest.

Acquisition Accounting, ~~Covered~~Acquired Loans and Related Indemnification Asset.The Company accounts for its acquisitions under ASC Topic 805,Business Combinations, which requires the use of the ~~purchase~~acquisition method of accounting. All identifiable assets acquired, including loans, are recorded at fair value. No allowance for loan losses related to the acquired loans is recorded on the acquisition date as the fair value of the loans acquired incorporates assumptions regarding credit risk. ~~Loans~~All loans acquired are recorded at fair value in accordance with the fair value methodology prescribed in ASC Topic ~~820,~~820. For covered acquired loans fair value is exclusive of the shared-loss agreements with the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC). The fair value estimates associated with the loans include estimates related to expected prepayments and the amount and timing of undiscounted expected principal, interest and other cash flows.

Over the life of the purchased credit impaired loans acquired, ~~loans,~~ the Company continues to estimate cash flows expected to be collected on pools of loans sharing common risk characteristics, which are treated in the aggregate when applying various valuation techniques. The Company evaluates at each balance sheet date whether the present value of its pools of loans determined using the effective interest rates has decreased and if so, recognizes a provision for loan loss in its consolidated statement of income. For any increases in cash flows expected to be collected, the Company adjusts the amount of accretable yield recognized on a prospective basis over the pool’s remaining life.

Because the FDIC will reimburse the Company for certain acquired loans should the Company experience a loss, an indemnification asset is recorded at fair value at the acquisition date. The indemnification asset is recognized at the same time as the indemnified loans, and measured on the same basis, subject to collectability or contractual limitations. The shared-loss agreements on the acquisition date reflect the reimbursements expected to be received from the FDIC, using an appropriate discount rate, which reflects counterparty credit risk and other uncertainties.

For our FDIC-assisted transactions, shared-loss agreements continue to be measured on the same basis as the related indemnified loans. Because the acquired loans are subject to the accounting prescribed by ASC Topic 310, subsequent changes to the basis of the shared-loss agreements also follow that model. Deterioration in the credit quality of the loans (immediately recorded as an adjustment to the allowance for loan losses) would immediately increase the basis of the shared-loss agreements, with the offset recorded through the consolidated statement of income as a reduction of the provision for loan losses. Increases in the credit quality or cash flows of loans (reflected as an adjustment to yield and accreted into income over the weighted-average remaining life of the loans) decrease the basis of the shared-loss agreements, with such decrease being amortized into income over 1) the same period or 2) the life of the shared-loss agreements, whichever is shorter. Loss assumptions used in the basis of the indemnified loans are consistent with the loss assumptions used to measure the indemnification asset. Fair value accounting incorporates into the fair value of the indemnification asset an element of the time value of money, which is accreted back into income over the life of the shared-loss agreements.

Upon the determination of an incurred loss the indemnification asset will be reduced by the amount owed by the FDIC. A corresponding claim receivable is recorded until cash is received from the FDIC.

Foreclosed Assets Held for Sale.Real estate and personal properties acquired through or in lieu of loan foreclosure are to be sold and are initially recorded at fair value at the date of foreclosure, establishing a new cost basis. Valuations are periodically performed by management, and the real estate and personal properties are carried at fair value less cost to sell. Gains and losses from the sale of other real estate and personal properties are recorded in non-interest income, and expenses used to maintain the properties are included in non-interest expenses.

Intangible Assets. Intangible assets consist of goodwill and core deposit intangibles. Goodwill represents the excess purchase price over the fair value of net assets acquired in business acquisitions. The core deposit intangible represents the excess intangible value of acquired deposit customer relationships as determined by valuation specialists. The core deposit intangibles are being amortized over 48 to 114 months on a straight-line basis. Goodwill is not amortized but rather is evaluated for impairment on at least an annual basis. We perform an annual impairment test of goodwill and core deposit intangibles as required by FASB ASC 350,Intangibles—Goodwill and Other, in the fourth quarter.

Income Taxes. The Company accounts for income taxes in accordance with income tax accounting guidance (ASC 740,Income Taxes). The income tax accounting guidance results in two components of income tax expense: current and deferred. Current income tax expense reflects taxes to be paid or refunded for the current period by applying the provisions of the enacted tax law to the taxable income or excess of deductions over revenues. The Company determines deferred income taxes using the liability (or balance sheet) method. Under this method, the net deferred tax asset or liability is based on the tax effects of the differences between the book and tax bases of assets and liabilities, and enacted changes in tax rates and laws are recognized in the period in which they occur.

Deferred income tax expense results from changes in deferred tax assets and liabilities between periods. Deferred tax assets are recognized if it is more likely than not, based on the technical merits, that the tax position will be realized or sustained upon examination. The term more likely than not means a likelihood of more than 50 percent; the terms examined and upon examination also include resolution of the related appeals or litigation processes, if any. A tax position that meets the more-likely-than-not recognition threshold is initially and subsequently measured as the largest amount of tax benefit that has a greater than 50 percent likelihood of being realized upon settlement with a taxing authority that has full knowledge of all relevant information. The determination of whether or not a tax position has met the more-likely-than-not recognition threshold considers the facts, circumstances and information available at the reporting date and is subject to the management’s judgment. Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance if, based on the weight of evidence available, it is more likely than not that some portion or all of a deferred tax asset will not be realized.

The Company and its subsidiary file consolidated tax returns. Its subsidiary provides for income taxes on a separate return basis, and remits to the Company amounts determined to be currently payable.

Stock Options. In accordance with FASB ASC 718,Compensation—Stock Compensation,and FASB ASC 505-50,Equity-Based Payments to Non-Employees, the fair value of each option award is estimated on the date of grant. The Company recognizes compensation expense for the grant-date fair value of the option award over the vesting period of the award.

On February 16, 2012, we acquired 17 branch locations in the Gulf Coast communities of Baldwin County, Alabama, and the Florida Panhandle through the acquisition of Vision Bank. Including the effects of purchase accounting adjustments, we acquired total assets of $529.5 million, total performing loans (after discount) of $340.3 million, cash and due from banks of $140.2 million, goodwill of $17.4 million, fixed assets of $12.5 million, deferred taxes of $11.2 million, core deposit intangible of $3.2 million and total deposits of $524.4 million. The fair value discount on the $355.8 million of gross loans was $15.5 million. We did not purchase certain of Vision’s performing loans nor any of its non-performing loans or other real estate owned.

See Note 2 “Business Combinations” in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for an additional discussion for the acquisition of Vision Bank.

On November 2, 2012, Centennial Bank acquired all the deposits and substantially all the assets of Heritage Bank from the FDIC. This transaction did not include any non-performing loans or other real estate owned of Heritage. In connection with the Heritage acquisition, Centennial Bank opted to not enter into a loss-sharing agreement with the FDIC.

Heritage operated three banking offices located in Tampa, Lutz and Wesley Chapel, Florida. Including the effects of the purchase accounting adjustments, Centennial Bank acquired approximately $224.8 million in assets including a cash settlement of $82.3 million to balance the transaction, federal funds sold of $7.0 million, approximately $92.6 million in performing loans including loan discounts, core deposit intangible of $1.1 million and approximately $219.5 million of deposits.

See Note 2 “Business Combinations” in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for an additional discussion for the acquisition of Heritage Bank.

The Acquisition was conducted in accordance with the provisions of Section 363 of the Bankruptcy Code pursuant to a voluntary petition for relief under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code filed by PBHC with the Bankruptcy Court on August 14, 2012. The sale of Premier by PBHC was subject to certain bidding procedures approved by the Bankruptcy Court. No qualifying competing bids were received. The Bankruptcy Court entered a final order on November 29, 2012 approving the sale of Premier to the Company pursuant to and in accordance with the Premier Agreement.

Premier conducted banking business from six locations in the Florida panhandle cities of Tallahassee (five) and Quincy (one). Including the effects of the purchase accounting adjustments, Centennial Bank acquired approximately $264.8 million in assets, $12.5 million in investment securities, $4.0 million of federal funds sold, $138.1 million in loans including loan discounts, $5.1 million of bank premises and equipment, $7.6 million of foreclosed assets, $8.6 million of goodwill, $1.9 million of core deposit intangible, $5.7 million in cash value of life insurance, $246.3 million of deposits and $13.3 million of FHLB borrowed funds.

See Note 2 “Business Combinations” in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for an additional discussion for the acquisition of Premier Bank.

In conjunction with FDIC-assisted transactions, the Company entered into loss share agreements with the FDIC. These agreements cover realized losses on loans, foreclosed real estate and certain other assets. These loss share assets are measured separately from the loan portfolios because they are not contractually embedded in the loans and are not transferable with the loans should the Company choose to dispose of them. Fair values at the acquisition dates were estimated based on projected cash flows available for loss-share based on the credit adjustments estimated for each loan pool and the loss share percentages. The loss share assets are also separately measured from the related loans and foreclosed real estate and recorded as FDIC indemnification assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. Subsequent to the acquisition date, reimbursements received from the FDIC for actual incurred losses will reduce the loss share assets. Reductions to expected credit losses, to the extent such reductions to expected credit losses are the result of an improvement to the actual or expected cash flows from the covered assets, will also reduce the loss share assets. Increases in expected credit losses will require an increase to the allowance for loan losses and a corresponding increase to the loss share assets.

The following table summarizes the activity in the Company’s FDIC indemnification asset during the periods indicated:

Our purchase and assumption agreements in connection with our FDIC-assisted acquisitions allow the FDIC to recover a portion of the loss share funds previously paid out under the indemnification agreements in the event losses fail to reach the expected loss under a claw back provision. Should the markets associated with any of the banks we acquired through FDIC-assisted transactions perform better than initially projected, the Bank is required to pay this clawback (or “true-up”) payment to the FDIC on a specified date following the tenth anniversary of such acquisition (the “True-Up Measurement Date”).

Specifically, in connection with the Old Southern and Key West acquisitions, such “true-up” payments would be equal to 50% of the excess, if any, of (i) 20% of a stated threshold of $110.0 million in the case of Old Southern and $23.0 million in the case of Key West, less (ii) the sum of (A) 25% of the asset premium (discount) plus (B) 25% of the Cumulative Shared Loss Payments (defined as the aggregate of all of the payments made or payable to Centennial Bank minus the aggregate of all of the payments made or payable to the FDIC) plus (C) the Period Servicing Amounts for any twelve-month period prior to and ending on the True-Up Measurement Date (defined as the product of the simple average of the principal amount of shared loss loans and shared loss assets (other than shared loss securities) at the beginning and end of such period times 1%).

In connection with the Coastal-Bayside, Wakulla and Gulf State acquisitions, the “true-up” payments would be equal to 50% of the excess, if any, of (i) 20% of an intrinsic loss estimate of $121.0 million in the case of Coastal, $24.0 million in the case of Bayside, $73.0 million in the case of Wakulla and $35.0 million in the case of Gulf State, less (ii) the sum of (A) 20% of the net loss amount (the sum of all losses less the sum of all recoveries on covered assets) plus (B) 25% of the asset premium (discount) plus (C) 3.5% of the total loans subject to loss sharing under the loss sharing agreements as specified in the schedules to the agreements.

The amount of FDIC-assisted acquisitions true-up accrued at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012 was $7.4 million and $7.1 million, respectively.

Liberty Bancshares, Inc.On June 25, 2013, Home BancShares, Inc. announced the signing of a definitive agreement for Liberty Bancshares, Inc. (“Liberty”), parent company of Liberty Bank of Arkansas, to merge into Home BancShares, Inc. Under the terms of the agreement, shareholders of Liberty will receive $250 million of HBI stock plus $30 million in cash.

As of March 31, 2013, Liberty conducted banking business from 46 locations across Northeast, Northwest and Western Arkansas. Liberty held $2.85 billion in assets, $707.2 million in investment securities, $900,000 of federal funds sold, $1.84 billion in loans, $82.3 million of bank premises and equipment, $29.7 million of foreclosed assets, $88.5 million of goodwill, $2.0 million of core deposit intangible, $3.6 million in cash value of life insurance, $2.17 billion of deposits, $206.0 million of FHLB borrowed funds and $57.7 million of subordinated debentures.

Upon completion of the transaction, the combined company will have approximately $7.0 billion in total assets, $5.6 billion in deposits, $4.4 billion in loans, 151 branches, 186 ATMs, and 1,500 employees across Arkansas, Florida and Southern Alabama. The merger will significantly increase the Company’s deposit market share in Arkansas making it the 2nd largest bank holding company headquartered in Arkansas.

The acquisition is expected to close late in the third quarter or early in the fourth quarter of 2013 and is subject to Home and Liberty shareholder approval, regulatory approval, and other conditions set forth in the merger agreement. Pursuant to the terms of the merger agreement, Liberty Bank will merge with and into Centennial Bank immediately after the merger of Liberty with and into Home. Subject to the receipt of requisite approvals, Home expects to repurchase all of Liberty’s Small Business Lending Fund preferred stock held by the U.S. Treasury shortly after the closing.

See Note 2 “Business Combinations” in the Condensed Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for an additional discussion for the future acquisition of Liberty Bank.

In the near term, our ~~continuing evaluation~~principal acquisition focus will be closing on the Liberty acquisition. After closing, we will then immediately concentrate on the integration of the core banking systems and corporate culture to achieve the projected efficiencies. As we progress with our plans for the Liberty acquisition, we will continue to evaluate our growth plans for the ~~Company, we~~Company. We still believe properly priced future bank acquisitions can be a profitable growth strategy. InAt the ~~near term,~~appropriate time, our principal acquisition focus will once again be to expand our presence in Florida, Arkansas, South Alabama and other nearby ~~markets through pursuing additional FDIC-assisted~~markets. While we remain diligent in evaluating potential bank acquisition opportunities, ~~and non FDIC-assisted bank acquisitions. While we seek~~our objective is to be a successful bidder to the FDIC on one or more additional failed depository institutions within our targeted markets, there is no assurance that we will be the winning bidder on other FDIC-assisted transactions.

~~We will continue evaluating all types of potential bank acquisitions to determine~~do what is in the best interest of our Company. Our goal in making these decisions is to maximize the return to our investors.

We intend to continue opening new (commonly referred to as de novo) branches in our current markets and in other attractive market areas if opportunities arise. ~~Presently, the Company has plans in~~During the second quarter, ~~of 2013 to open~~the Company opened a loan production office in Pensacola, Florida ~~which will convert~~and subsequently converted it to a full-service ~~branch shortly thereafter. During the middle of 2013,~~branch. In addition, the Company ~~has plans for~~opened one ~~additional~~ de novo branch location on Highway 30A in Seagrove, ~~Florida. In January 2013, one branch~~Florida during the first part of July and has plans to open two additional de novo branches in ~~south Arkansas was closed to improve operational efficiency.~~the Florida Panhandle during the third quarter of 2013. As a result of our acquisition of Premier Bank in the fourth quarter of 2012, three branches ~~were~~ closed in the Tallahassee, Florida area ~~in April~~during the second quarter of 2013. ~~As the Company evaluates its operational efficiencies in the Tallahassee market, the Company may consider closing an additional branch location.~~

The Company has 46 branches in Arkansas, 5153 branches in Florida and ~~seven~~7 branches in Alabama as of ~~April~~July 18, 2013. Upon completion of the Liberty Bank transaction announced at the end of the second quarter, Centennial Bank will have 46 additional branch locations across Northeast Arkansas, Northwest Arkansas and Western Arkansas.

Our net income increased ~~21.0%~~$2.2 million or 14.0% to ~~$17.5~~$17.7 million for the three-month period ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2013, from ~~$14.5~~$15.5 million for the same period in 2012. On a diluted earnings per common share basis, our earnings were $0.31 and $0.27 (split adjusted) for the three-month periods ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively. The $2.2 million increase in net income is primarily associated with the additional net interest income and other non-interest income resulting from our 2012 acquisitions of Heritage and Premier. Additionally, there was a reduction in the provision for loan losses of $483,000 in second quarter of 2013 when compared to the second quarter of 2012. These improvements were partially offset by a modest increase in the costs associated with the asset growth from our acquisitions.

Our net income increased $5.2 million or 17.4% to $35.2 million for the six-month period ended June 30, 2013, from $30.0 million for the same period in 2012. On a diluted earnings per common share basis, our earnings were $0.62 and ~~$0.51~~$0.53 (split adjusted) for the ~~three-month~~six-month periods ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively. The ~~$3.0~~$5.2 million increase in net income is primarily associated with the additional net interest income and other non-interest income resulting from our 2012 acquisitions of Vision, Heritage and Premier and a reduction in merger expenses by $1.7 million. Additionally, there was a reduction in the provision for loan losses of $483,000 in the first six months of 2013 when compared to the first six months 2012. These improvements were partially offset by a modest increase in the costs associated with the asset growth from our acquisitions. ~~There was no provision for loan losses in first quarter of 2012 and 2013.~~

Net interest income, our principal source of earnings, is the difference between the interest income generated by earning assets and the total interest cost of the deposits and borrowings obtained to fund those assets. Factors affecting the level of net interest income include the volume of earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities, yields earned on loans and investments and rates paid on deposits and other borrowings, the level of non-performing loans and the amount of non-interest-bearing liabilities supporting earning assets. Net interest income is analyzed in the discussion and tables below on a fully taxable equivalent basis. The adjustment to convert certain income to a fully taxable equivalent basis consists of dividing tax-exempt income by one minus the combined federal and state income tax ~~rate.~~rate (39.225% for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2013 and 2012).

The Federal Reserve Board sets various benchmark rates, including the Federal Funds rate, and thereby influences the general market rates of interest, including the deposit and loan rates offered by financial institutions. The Federal Funds rate, which is the cost to banks of immediately available overnight funds, was lowered on December 16, 2008 to a historic low of 0.25% to 0% where it has remained since that time.

Impairment testing on the estimated cash flows of the covered loans during the first quarter of 2013 were determined to have a materially projected credit improvement. As a result of this improvement, the Company will recognize approximately $15.6 million as an adjustment to yield over the weighted average life of the loans with ~~$2.2~~$2.0 million and $4.2 million of this amount being recognized during the second quarter and first ~~quarter~~six months of ~~2013.~~2013, respectively.

Net interest income on a fully taxable equivalent basis increased ~~$7.8~~$5.6 million, or ~~20.7%~~13.9%, to ~~$45.4~~$45.9 million for the three-month period ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2013, from ~~$37.6~~$40.3 million for the same period in 2012. This increase in net interest income was the result of a ~~$5.1~~$2.9 million increase in interest income combined with a $2.7 million decrease in interest expense. The ~~$5.1~~$2.9 million increase in interest income was primarily the result of a higher level of earning assets. The $2.7 million decrease in interest expense for the three-month period ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2013, is primarily the result of our interest bearing liabilities repricing in the lower interest rate environment combined with a decrease in our average time deposits, FHLB and other borrowed funds and subordinated debentures. The repricing of our interest bearing liabilities in the lower interest rate environment resulted in a ~~$2.0~~$1.7 million decrease in interest expense. The lower level of our average time deposits, FHLB and other borrowed funds and subordinated debentures offset by increases in the remaining interest bearing liabilities resulted in a reduction in interest expense of approximately ~~$634,000.~~$957,000.

Net interest income on a fully taxable equivalent basis increased $13.4 million, or 17.2%, to $91.3 million for the six-month period ended June 30, 2013, from $77.9 million for the same period in 2012. This increase in net interest income was the result of an $8.0 million increase in interest income combined with a $5.3 million decrease in interest expense. The $8.0 million increase in interest income was primarily the result of a higher level of earning assets. The $5.3 million decrease in interest expense for the six-month period ended June 30, 2013, is primarily the result of our interest bearing liabilities repricing in the lower interest rate environment combined with a decrease in our average time deposits, FHLB and other borrowed funds and subordinated debentures. The repricing of our interest bearing liabilities in the lower interest rate environment resulted in a $3.7 million decrease in interest expense. The lower level of our average time deposits, FHLB and other borrowed funds and subordinated debentures offset by increases in the remaining interest bearing liabilities resulted in a reduction in interest expense of approximately $1.7 million.

Net interest margin, on a fully taxable equivalent basis, was ~~5.15%~~5.18% and 5.16% for the three and six months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2013 compared to 4.65% and 4.65% for the same periods in 2012, respectively. When adjusted for the previously discussed $2.2 million of additional yield for first quarter, net interest margin, on a fully taxable equivalent basis, was 4.91% for the quarter just ended compared to 4.65% in the first quarter of 2012. Our ability to improve pricing on interest bearing deposits combined with additional yield on FDIC loss sharing loans which more than offset the lower interest rates on newly originated loans in the loan portfolio during this historically low rate environment allowed the Company to expand net interest margin. The effective yield on non-covered loans for the three months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2013 and 2012 was ~~6.11%~~6.04% and 6.21%, respectively. The effective yield on non-covered loans for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012 was 6.08% and 6.21%, respectively. The effective yield on covered loans for the three months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2013 and 2012 was ~~10.30%~~10.78% and ~~7.78%~~7.91%, respectively. The effective yield on covered loans for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012 was 10.53% and 7.84%, respectively. Excluding the ~~$2.2~~$2.0 million and $4.2 million of additional yield for second quarter and first ~~quarter,~~six months of 2013, respectively, the pro-forma effective yield on covered loans was ~~7.94%.~~

When adjusted for the previously discussed $2.0 million of additional yield for first quarter, net interest margin, on a fully taxable equivalent basis, was 4.95% for the quarter just ended compared to 4.65% in the second quarter of 2012. When adjusted for the previously discussed $4.2 million of additional yield for first six months of 2013, net interest margin, on a fully taxable equivalent basis, was 4.93% for the six months just ended compared to 4.65% for the first six months of 2012.

Tables 1 and 2 reflect an analysis of net interest income on a fully taxable equivalent basis for the ~~three-month~~three and six-month periods ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2013 and 2012, as well as changes in fully taxable equivalent net interest margin for the ~~three-month period~~three and six-month periods ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2013, compared to the same periods in 2012.


	Three Months Ended March 31,						Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2013			2012			2013			2012			2013			2012
	(Dollars in thousands)						(Dollars in thousands)
Interest income	$	48,148		$	42,988		$	48,085		$	45,089		$	96,233		$	88,077
Fully taxable equivalent adjustment		1,075			1,115			1,051			1,126			2,126			2,241

Interest income – fully taxable equivalent		49,223			44,103			49,136			46,215			98,359			90,318
Interest expense		3,799			6,454			3,244			5,930			7,043			12,384

Net interest income – fully taxable equivalent	$	45,424		$	37,649		$	45,892		$	40,285		$	91,316		$	77,934

Yield on earning assets – fully taxable equivalent		5.58	%		5.44	%		5.54	%		5.33	%		5.56	%		5.39	%
Cost of interest-bearing liabilities		0.52			0.92			0.45			0.79			0.48			0.85
Net interest spread – fully taxable equivalent		5.06			4.52			5.09			4.54			5.08			4.54
Net interest margin – fully taxable equivalent		5.15			4.65			5.18			4.65			5.16			4.65


	Three Months Ended		Six Months Ended
	June 30,		June 30,
	2013 vs. 2012		2013 vs. 2012
	(In thousands)
Increase (decrease) in interest income due to change in earning assets	$	2,747	$	7,871
Increase (decrease) in interest income due to change in earning asset yields		174		170
(Increase) decrease in interest expense due to change in interest-bearing liabilities		957		1,665
(Increase) decrease in interest expense due to change in interest rates paid on interest-bearing liabilities		1,729		3,676

Increase (decrease) in net interest income	$	5,607	$	13,382

Table 3 shows, for each major category of earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities, the average amount outstanding, the interest income or expense on that amount and the average rate earned or expensed for the ~~three-month~~three and six-month periods ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2013 and ~~2012.~~2012, respectively. The table also shows the average rate earned on all earning assets, the average rate expensed on all interest-bearing liabilities, the net interest spread and the net interest margin for the same periods. The analysis is presented on a fully taxable equivalent basis. Non-accrual loans were included in average loans for the purpose of calculating the rate earned on total loans.


	Three Months Ended March 31,														Three Months Ended June 30,
	2013							2012							2013							2012
	Average Balance		Income / Expense		Yield / Rate			Average Balance		Income / Expense		Yield / Rate			Average Balance		Income / Expense		Yield / Rate			Average Balance		Income / Expense		Yield / Rate
	(Dollars in thousands)														(Dollars in thousands)
ASSETS
Earnings assets
Interest-bearing balances due from banks	$	148,744	$	98		0.27	%	$	151,569	$	85		0.23	%	$	135,431	$	86		0.25	%	$	222,822	$	127		0.23	%
Federal funds sold		15,724		7		0.18			2,964		2		0.27			10,169		6		0.24			6,875		3		0.18
Investment securities – taxable		561,056		2,403		1.74			568,890		2,860		2.02			572,997		2,490		1.74			599,585		3,060		2.05
Investment securities – non-taxable		165,411		2,419		5.93			151,289		2,495		6.63			172,439		2,394		5.57			155,317		2,498		6.47
Loans receivable		2,684,376		44,296		6.69			2,384,860		38,661		6.52			2,663,627		44,160		6.65			2,501,464		40,527		6.52

Total interest-earning assets		3,575,311		49,223		5.58			3,259,572		44,103		5.44			3,554,663		49,136		5.54			3,486,063		46,215		5.33

Non-earning assets		617,582							567,043							592,822							586,198

Total assets	$	4,192,893						$	3,826,615						$	4,147,485						$	4,072,261

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Liabilities
Interest-bearing liabilities
Savings and interest-bearing transaction accounts	$	1,771,631	$	814		0.19	%	$	1,328,139	$	1,011		0.31	%	$	1,779,269	$	741		0.17	%	$	1,519,151	$	1,003		0.27	%
Time deposits		986,787		1,671		0.69			1,241,210		3,649		1.18			900,809		1,388		0.62			1,228,764		3,161		1.03

Total interest-bearing deposits		2,758,418		2,485		0.37			2,569,349		4,660		0.73			2,680,078		2,129		0.32			2,747,915		4,164		0.61
Federal funds purchased		—		—		0.00			382		—		0.00			1		—		0.00			303		—		0.00
Securities sold under agreement to repurchase		69,664		80		0.47			69,051		110		0.64			72,599		86		0.48			71,485		111		0.62
FHLB borrowed funds		130,376		1,004		3.12			142,761		1,160		3.27			130,282		1,012		3.12			140,577		1,134		3.24
Subordinated debentures		27,149		230		3.44			44,331		524		4.75			3,093		17		2.20			44,331		521		4.73

Total interest-bearing liabilities		2,985,607		3,799		0.52			2,825,874		6,454		0.92			2,886,053		3,244		0.45			3,004,611		5,930		0.79

Non-interest bearing liabilities
Non-interest bearing deposits		668,222							497,634							704,847							559,554
Other liabilities		18,769							25,563							22,939							21,445

Total liabilities		3,672,598							3,349,071							3,613,839							3,585,610
Stockholders’ equity		520,295							477,544							533,646							486,651

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	4,192,893						$	3,826,615						$	4,147,485						$	4,072,261

Net interest spread						5.06	%						4.52	%						5.09	%						4.54	%
Net interest income and margin			$	45,424		5.15	%			$	37,649		4.65	%			$	45,892		5.18	%			$	40,285		4.65	%

Table 4 shows changes in interest income and interest expense resulting from changes in volume and changes in interest rates for the three-month ~~period~~and six-month periods ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2013 compared to the same periods in 2012, on a fully taxable basis. The changes in interest rate and volume have been allocated to changes in average volume and changes in average rates, in proportion to the relationship of absolute dollar amounts of the changes in rates and volume.


	Three Months Ended March 31,									Three Months Ended June 30,									Six Months Ended June 30,
	2013 over 2012									2013 over 2012									2013 over 2012
	Volume			Yield/Rate			Total			Volume			Yield/Rate			Total			Volume			Yield/Rate			Total
	(In thousands)									(In thousands)
Increase (decrease) in:
Interest income:
Interest-bearing balances due from banks	$	(2	)	$	15		$	13		$	(54	)	$	13		$	(41	)	$	(54	)	$	26		$	(28	)
Federal funds sold		6			(1	)		5			2			1			3			8			—			8
Investment securities – taxable		(38	)		(419	)		(457	)		(131	)		(439	)		(570	)		(170	)		(857	)		(1,027	)
Investment securities – non-taxable		221			(297	)		(76	)		258			(362	)		(104	)		481			(661	)		(180	)
Loans receivable		4,931			704			5,635			2,672			961			3,633			7,606			1,662			9,268

Total interest income		5,118			2			5,120			2,747			174			2,921			7,871			170			8,041

Interest expense:
Interest-bearing transaction and savings deposits		277			(474	)		(197	)		151			(413	)		(262	)		423			(883	)		(460	)
Time deposits		(645	)		(1,333	)		(1,978	)		(708	)		(1,065	)		(1,773	)		(1,366	)		(2,384	)		(3,750	)
Federal funds purchased		—			—			—			—			—			—			—			—			—
Securities sold under agreement to repurchase		1			(31	)		(30	)		2			(27	)		(25	)		3			(58	)		(55	)
FHLB borrowed funds		(97	)		(59	)		(156	)		(81	)		(41	)		(122	)		(179	)		(99	)		(278	)
Subordinated debentures		(170	)		(124	)		(294	)		(321	)		(183	)		(504	)		(546	)		(252	)		(798	)

Total interest expense		(634	)		(2,021	)		(2,655	)		(957	)		(1,729	)		(2,686	)		(1,665	)		(3,676	)		(5,341	)

Increase (decrease) in net interest income	$	5,752		$	2,023		$	7,775		$	3,704		$	1,903		$	5,607		$	9,536		$	3,846		$	13,382

Our management assesses the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses by applying the provisions of FASB ASC 310-10-35. Specific allocations are determined for loans considered to be impaired and loss factors are assigned to the remainder of the loan portfolio to determine an appropriate level in the allowance for loan losses. The allowance is increased, as necessary, by making a provision for loan losses. The specific allocations for impaired loans are assigned based on an estimated net realizable value after a thorough review of the credit relationship. The potential loss factors associated with the remainder of the loan portfolio are based on an internal net loss experience, as well as management’s review of trends within the portfolio and related industries.

While general economic trends have improved recently, we cannot be certain that the current economic conditions will considerably improve in the near future. Recent and ongoing events at the national and international levels can create uncertainty in the financial markets. Despite these economic uncertainties, we continue to follow our historically conservative procedures for lending and evaluating the provision and allowance for loan losses. Our practice continues to be primarily traditional real estate lending with strong loan-to-value ratios.

Generally, commercial, commercial real estate, and residential real estate loans are assigned a level of risk at origination. Thereafter, these loans are reviewed on a regular basis. The periodic reviews generally include loan payment and collateral status, the borrowers’ financial data, and key ratios such as cash flows, operating income, liquidity, and leverage. A material change in the borrower’s credit analysis can result in an increase or decrease in the loan’s assigned risk grade. Aggregate dollar volume by risk grade is monitored on an on-going basis.

Our management reviews certain key loan quality indicators on a monthly basis, including current economic conditions, delinquency trends and ratios, portfolio mix changes, and other information management deems necessary. This review process provides a degree of objective measurement that is used in conjunction with periodic internal evaluations. To the extent that this review process yields differences between estimated and actual observed losses, adjustments are made to the loss factors used to determine the appropriate level of the allowance for loan losses.

Our Company is primarily a real estate lender in the markets we serve. As such, we are subject to declines in asset quality when real estate prices fall during a recession. The recent recession harshly impacted the real estate market in Florida. The economic conditions particularly in our Florida market have improved recently, although not to pre-recession levels. Our Arkansas markets’ economies have been fairly stable over the past several years with no boom or bust. As a result, the Arkansas economy fared better with its real estate values during this time period.

The provision for loan losses represents management’s determination of the amount necessary to be charged against the current period’s earnings, to maintain the allowance for loan losses at a level that is considered adequate in relation to the estimated risk inherent in the loan portfolio. There was ~~zero~~$100,000 provision for covered loans for both the three and six months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2013. There was $1.3 million provision for covered loans for both the three and six months ended June 30, 2012.

The $100,000 of provision for loan losses for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 is a result of impairment testing on the estimated cash flows of the covered loans during the second quarter of 2013 which established that one pool evaluated had experienced material projected credit deterioration. As a result of this projection, we recorded a $500,000 provision for loan losses to the allowance for loan losses related to the purchased impaired loans at June 30, 2013. Since these loans are covered by loss share with the FDIC, we were able to increase the related indemnification asset by $400,000 resulting in a net provision for loan losses of $100,000.

The $1.3 million of provision for loan losses for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 is a result of impairment testing on the estimated cash flows of the covered loans during the second quarter of 2012 which established that two pools evaluated had experienced material projected credit deterioration. As a result of this projection, we recorded a $6.6 million provision for loan losses to the allowance for loan losses related to the purchased impaired loans at June 30, 2012. Since these loans are covered by loss share with the FDIC, we were able to increase the related indemnification asset by $5.3 million resulting in a net provision for loan losses of $1.3 million.

Our provision for loan losses for non-covered loans ~~remained~~increased $750,000 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 from zero for the three and six months ended ~~March 31, 2013 and~~June 30, 2012. The net loans charged off for non-covered loans for the three and six months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2013 were ~~$2.9~~$2.6 million and $5.4 million compared to ~~$1.1~~$1.2 million and $2.3 million for the same ~~period~~periods in ~~2012.~~2012, respectively. Of the ~~$2.9~~$2.6 million and $5.4 million net charged off for the non-covered impaired loans for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013, approximately $52,000 and $1.2 million isare from our Florida ~~market.~~market, respectively. The remaining ~~$1.7~~$2.5 million and $4.2 million predominately relates to net charge-offs on loans in our Arkansas ~~market.~~market for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013, respectively. See “Allowance for Loan Losses” in the Management’s Discussion and Analysis for an additional discussion of Arkansas and Florida charge-offs.

Our current or historical provision levels should not be relied upon as a predictor or indicator of future levels going forward.

Total non-interest income was ~~$9.0~~$9.8 million and $18.8 million for the three-month ~~period~~and six-month periods ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2013, respectively, compared to ~~$10.1~~$11.1 million and $21.2 million for the same ~~period~~periods in ~~2012.~~2012, respectively. Our recurring non-interest income includes service charges on deposit accounts, other service charges and fees, mortgage lending, insurance, title fees, increase in cash value of life insurance, dividends and FDIC indemnification ~~accretion.~~accretion/amortization.

Table 5 measures the various components of our non-interest income for the three-month and six-month periods ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively, as well as changes for the three-month ~~period~~and six-month periods ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2013 compared to the same periods in 2012.


	Three Months Ended											Three Months Ended											Six Months Ended
	March 31,						2013 Change					June 30,						2013 Change					June 30,					2013 Change
	2013			2012			from 2012					2013			2012			from 2012					2013			2012		from 2012
	(Dollars in thousands)											(Dollars in thousands)
Service charges on deposit accounts	$	3,709		$	3,505		$	204		5.8	%	$	4,088		$	3,668		$	420		11.5	%	$	7,797		$	7,173	$	624		8.7	%
Other service charges and fees		3,437			3,024			413		13.7			3,479			3,223			256		7.9			6,916			6,247		669		10.7
Mortgage lending income		1,372			904			468		51.8			1,619			1,277			342		26.8			2,991			2,181		810		37.1
Insurance commissions		679			551			128		23.2			444			438			6		1.4			1,123			989		134		13.5
Income from title services		109			88			21		23.9			136			129			7		5.4			245			217		28		12.9
Increase in cash value of life insurance		180			257			(77	)	(30.0	)		218			214			4		1.9			398			471		(73	)	(15.5	)
Dividends from FHLB, FRB, Bankers’ bank & other		175			175			—		0.0			401			175			226		129.1			576			350		226		64.6
Gain on sale of SBA loans		56			—			56		100.0			—			198			(198	)	(100.0	)		56			198		(142	)	(71.7	)
Gain (loss) on sale of premises and equipment, net		15			—			15		100.0			394			359			35		9.7			409			359		50		13.9
Gain (loss) on OREO, net		86			(107	)		193		(180.4	)		441			159			282		177.4			527			52		475		913.5
Gain (loss) on securities, net		—			19			(19	)	(100.0	)		111			(9	)		120		(1,333.3	)		111			10		101		1,010.0
FDIC indemnification accretion/amortization, net		(1,992	)		670			(2,662	)	(397.3	)		(2,283	)		449			(2,732	)	(608.5	)		(4,275	)		1,119		(5,394	)	(482.0	)
Other income		1,199			1,017			182		17.9			757			773			(16	)	(2.1	)		1,956			1,790		166		9.3

Total non-interest income	$	9,025		$	10,103		$	(1,078	)	(10.7	)%	$	9,805		$	11,053		$	(1,248	)	(11.3	)%	$	18,830		$	21,156	$	(2,326	)	(11.0	)%

Non-interest income decreased ~~$1.1~~$1.2 million, or ~~10.7%~~11.3%, to ~~$9.0~~$9.8 million for the three-month period ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2013 from ~~$10.1~~$11.1 million for the same period in 2012. Non-interest income decreased $2.3 million, or 11.0%, to $18.8 million for the six-month period ended June 30, 2013 from $21.2 million for the same period in 2012.

The primary ~~factor~~factors that resulted in this decrease was an increase in amortization on our FDIC indemnification asset offset by improvements related to service charges on deposits, other service charges and fees, mortgage lending income, dividends from FHLB, FRB, Bankers’ bank & other, changes in OREO gains and ~~losses,~~ gain on ~~sales and other income.~~securities.

Non-interest expense consists of salaries and employee benefits, occupancy and equipment, data processing, and other expenses such as advertising, merger and acquisition expenses, amortization of intangibles, electronic banking expense, FDIC and state assessment, insurance, other professional fees and legal and accounting fees.

Table 6 below sets forth a summary of non-interest expense for the three-month and six-month periods ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2013 and 2012, as well as changes for the three-month ~~period~~and six-month periods ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2013 compared to the same ~~period~~periods in 2012.


	Three Months Ended									Three Months Ended									Six Months Ended
	March 31,				2013 Change					June 30,				2013 Change					June 30,				2013 Change
	2013		2012		from 2012					2013		2012		from 2012					2013		2012		from 2012
	(Dollars in thousands)									(Dollars in thousands)
Salaries and employee benefits	$	12,952	$	11,386	$	1,566		13.8	%	$	12,957	$	11,903	$	1,054		8.9	%	$	25,909	$	23,289	$	2,620		11.2	%
Occupancy and equipment		3,594		3,431		163		4.8			3,894		3,552		342		9.6			7,488		6,983		505		7.2
Data processing expense		1,510		1,091		419		38.4			1,231		1,371		(140	)	(10.2	)		2,741		2,462		279		11.3
Other operating expenses:
Advertising		693		460		233		50.7			120		904		(784	)	(86.7	)		813		1,364		(551	)	(40.4	)
Merger and acquisition expenses		28		1,692		(1,664	)	(98.3	)		1		—		1		100.0			29		1,692		(1,663	)	(98.3	)
Amortization of intangibles		802		630		172		27.3			802		694		108		15.6			1,604		1,324		280		21.1
Electronic banking expense		863		793		70		8.8			960		728		232		31.9			1,823		1,521		302		19.9
Directors’ fees		190		212		(22	)	(10.4	)		210		193		17		8.8			400		405		(5	)	(1.2	)
Due from bank service charges		133		116		17		14.7			168		159		9		5.7			301		275		26		9.5
FDIC and state assessment		630		638		(8	)	(1.3	)		677		516		161		31.2			1,307		1,154		153		13.3
Insurance		566		401		165		41.1			555		424		131		30.9			1,121		825		296		35.9
Legal and accounting		322		322		—		0.0			394		287		107		37.3			716		609		107		17.6
Other professional fees		473		498		(25	)	(5.0	)		490		354		136		38.4			963		852		111		13.0
Operating supplies		343		264		79		29.9			332		291		41		14.1			675		555		120		21.6
Postage		207		221		(14	)	(6.3	)		231		240		(9	)	(3.8	)		438		461		(23	)	(5.0	)
Telephone		303		246		57		23.2			291		276		15		5.4			594		522		72		13.8
Other expense		2,254		1,985		269		13.6			2,542		2,532		10		0.4			4,796		4,517		279		6.2

Total non-interest expense	$	25,863	$	24,386	$	1,477		6.1	%	$	25,855	$	24,424	$	1,431		5.9	%	$	51,718	$	48,810	$	2,908		6.0	%

Non-interest expense increased $1.4 million, or 5.9%, to $25.9 million for the three-month period ended June 30, 2013, from $24.4 million for the same period in 2012. Non-interest expense, excluding merger expenses, increased ~~$3.1~~$4.6 million, or ~~13.8%~~9.7%, to ~~$25.8~~$51.7 million for the ~~three-month~~six-month period ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2013, from ~~$22.7~~$47.1 million for the same period in 2012.

The provision for income taxes increased ~~$2.2~~$1.3 million, or ~~28.5%~~14.7%, to ~~$10.0~~$10.3 million for the three-month period ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2013, from ~~$7.8~~$9.0 million as of ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2012. The provision for income taxes increased $3.5 million, or 21.1%, to $20.2 million for the six-month period ended June 30, 2013, from $16.7 million as of June 30, 2012. The effective income tax rate was ~~36.21%~~36.80% and 36.51% for the three-month ~~period~~and six-month periods ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2013, respectively, compared to ~~34.84%~~36.66% and 35.79% for the same ~~period~~periods in ~~2012.~~2012, respectively. The primary cause of the increase in taxes is the result of our higher earnings combined with our marginal tax rate of 39.225%.

Financial Condition as of and for the Period Ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012

Our non-covered loan portfolio averaged ~~$2.31~~$2.32 billion and ~~$1.91~~$2.06 billion during the three-month periods ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively. Our non-covered loan portfolio averaged $2.32 billion and $1.98 billion during the six-month periods ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively. Non-covered loans were ~~$2.31~~$2.34 billion as of ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2013, compared to $2.33 billion as of December 31, 2012. The relatively static state of the ~~legacy~~non-covered loan portfolio when compared to our historical expansion rates was not unexpected. This is primarily associated with ~~low~~lower loan demand and payoffs in our non-covered portfolios as our customers have grown more cautious in this weaker economy.

The most significant components of the non-covered loan portfolio were commercial real estate, residential real estate, consumer, and commercial and industrial loans. These non-covered loans are primarily originated within our market areas of Central Arkansas, North Central Arkansas, Southern Arkansas, the Florida Keys, Southwestern Florida, Central Florida, the Florida Panhandle and South Alabama, and are generally secured by residential or commercial real estate or business or personal property within our market areas.

As of ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2013, we had ~~$231.3~~$244.4 million of construction land development loans which were collateralized by land. This consisted of ~~$132.1~~$145.5 million for raw land and ~~$99.2~~$98.9 million for land with commercial and or residential lots.

Certain credit markets have experienced difficult conditions and volatility over the past several years, particularly Florida. Non-covered loans were ~~$1.5~~$1.54 billion, ~~$652.9~~$689.2 million and ~~$155.8~~$112.9 million as of ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2013 in Arkansas, Florida and Alabama, respectively.

Table 7 presents our loan balances not covered by loss share by category as of the dates indicated.


	As of		As of		As of		As of
	March 31, 2013		December 31, 2012		June 30, 2013		December 31, 2012
	(In thousands)				(In thousands)
Real estate:
Commercial real estate loans:
Non-farm/non-residential	$	1,014,301	$	1,019,039	$	1,003,391	$	1,019,039
Construction/land development		254,673		254,800		281,994		254,800
Agricultural		34,288		32,513		31,119		32,513
Residential real estate loans:
Residential 1-4 family		531,698		549,269		528,260		549,269
Multifamily residential		122,998		129,742		120,899		129,742

Total real estate		1,957,958		1,985,363		1,965,663		1,985,363
Consumer		33,823		37,462		32,671		37,462
Commercial and industrial		269,463		256,908		287,351		256,908
Agricultural		16,573		19,825		26,462		19,825
Other		31,329		31,641		27,095		31,641

Loans receivable not covered by loss share	$	2,309,146	$	2,331,199	$	2,339,242	$	2,331,199

Non-Covered Commercial Real Estate Loans. We originate non-farm and non-residential loans (primarily secured by commercial real estate), construction/land development loans, and agricultural loans, which are generally secured by real estate located in our market areas. Our commercial mortgage loans are generally collateralized by first liens on real estate and amortized over a 15 to 25 year period with balloon payments due at the end of one to five years. These loans are generally underwritten by assessing cash flow (debt service coverage), primary and secondary source of repayment, the financial strength of any guarantor, the strength of the tenant (if any), the borrower’s liquidity and leverage, management experience, ownership structure, economic conditions and industry specific trends and collateral. Generally, we will loan up to 85% of the value of improved property, 65% of the value of raw land and 75% of the value of land to be acquired and developed. A first lien on the property and assignment of lease is required if the collateral is rental property, with second lien positions considered on a case-by-case basis.

As of ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2013, non-covered commercial real estate loans totaled ~~$1.30~~$1.32 billion, or ~~56.4%~~56.3% of our non-covered loan portfolio, ~~compared~~which is comparable to $1.31 billion, or 56.0% of our non-covered loan portfolio, as of December 31, 2012. ~~This decrease is primarily related to normal loan pay downs combined with a level loan demand for these types of loans.~~ Our Florida and Alabama non-covered commercial real estate loans are approximately ~~15.8%~~16.6% and ~~3.5%~~2.2% of our non-covered loan portfolio, respectively.

Non-Covered Residential Real Estate Loans. We originate one to four family, owner occupied residential mortgage loans generally secured by property located in our primary market areas. The majority of our non-covered residential mortgage loans consist of loans secured by owner occupied, single family residences. Non-covered residential real estate loans generally have a loan-to-value ratio of up to 90%. These loans are underwritten by giving consideration to the borrower’s ability to pay, stability of employment or source of income, debt-to-income ratio, credit history and loan-to-value ratio.

As of ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2013, non-covered residential real estate loans totaled ~~$654.7~~$649.2 million, or ~~28.4%~~27.8% of our non-covered loan portfolio, compared to $679.0 million, or 29.1% of our non-covered loan portfolio, as of December 31, 2012. This decrease is primarily related to normal loan pay downs ~~combined with reduced loan demand~~ for these types of loans. Our Florida and Alabama non-covered residential real estate loans are approximately ~~9.4%~~10.4% and ~~2.4%~~2.0% of our non-covered loan portfolio, respectively.

Non-Covered Consumer Loans. Our non-covered consumer loan portfolio is composed of secured and unsecured loans originated by our banks. The performance of consumer loans will be affected by the local and regional economies as well as the rates of personal bankruptcies, job loss, divorce and other individual-specific characteristics.

As of ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2013, our non-covered consumer loan portfolio totaled ~~$33.8~~$32.7 million, or ~~1.5%~~1.4% of our total non-covered loan portfolio, compared to the $37.5 million, or 1.6% of our non-covered loan portfolio as of December 31, 2012. This decrease is associated with normal loan pay downs combined with reduced loan demand for these types of loans. Our Florida and Alabama non-covered consumer loans are ~~approximately 0.7% and 0.1%~~less than 1% of our non-covered loan ~~portfolio, respectively.~~portfolio.

Non-Covered Commercial and Industrial Loans. Commercial and industrial loans are made for a variety of business purposes, including working capital, inventory, equipment and capital expansion. The terms for commercial loans are generally one to seven years. Commercial loan applications must be supported by current financial information on the borrower and, where appropriate, by adequate collateral. Commercial loans are generally underwritten by addressing cash flow (debt service coverage), primary and secondary sources of repayment, the financial strength of any guarantor, the borrower’s liquidity and leverage, management experience, ownership structure, economic conditions and industry specific trends and collateral. The loan to value ratio depends on the type of collateral. Generally speaking, accounts receivable are financed at between 50% and 80% of accounts receivable less than 60 days past due. Inventory financing will range between 50% and 60% (with no work in process) depending on the borrower and nature of inventory. We require a first lien position for those loans.

As of ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2013, non-covered commercial and industrial loans outstanding totaled ~~$269.5~~$287.4 million, or ~~11.7%~~12.3% of our non-covered loan portfolio, compared to $256.9 million, or 11.0% of our non-covered loan portfolio, as of December 31, 2012. This increase is primarily related to expanded loan demand offset by normal loan pay ~~downs offset by expanded loan demand.~~downs. Our Florida and Alabama non-covered commercial and industrial loans are approximately ~~2.2%~~1.7% and ~~0.8%~~0.7% of our non-covered loan portfolio, respectively.


	Loans Receivable Not Covered by Loss Share		Loans Receivable Covered by FDIC Loss Share		Total Loans Receivable		Loans Receivable Not Covered by Loss Share		Loans Receivable Covered by FDIC Loss Share		Total Loans Receivable
	(In thousands)						(In thousands)
Real estate:
Commercial real estate loans
Non-farm/non-residential	$	1,014,301	$	155,345	$	1,169,646	$	1,003,391	$	143,922	$	1,147,313
Construction/land development		254,673		58,384		313,057		281,994		56,447		338,441
Agricultural		34,288		2,256		36,544		31,119		1,784		32,903
Residential real estate loans
Residential 1-4 family		531,698		120,246		651,944		528,260		107,612		635,872
Multifamily residential		122,998		9,443		132,441		120,899		10,644		131,543

Total real estate		1,957,958		345,674		2,303,632		1,965,663		320,409		2,286,072
Consumer		33,823		28		33,851		32,671		20		32,691
Commercial and industrial		269,463		11,712		281,175		287,351		8,193		295,544
Agricultural		16,573		—		16,573		26,462		—		26,462
Other		31,329		1,255		32,584		27,095		1,180		28,275

Total	$	2,309,146	$	358,669	$	2,667,815	$	2,339,242	$	329,802	$	2,669,044

We classify our non-covered problem loans into three categories: past due loans, special mention loans and classified loans (accruing and non-accruing).

When management determines that a loan is no longer performing, and that collection of interest appears doubtful, the loan is placed on non-accrual status. Loans that are 90 days past due are placed on non-accrual status unless they are adequately secured and there is reasonable assurance of full collection of both principal and interest. Our management closely monitors all loans that are contractually 90 days past due, treated as “special mention” or otherwise classified or on non-accrual status.

We first reported non-covered loans acquired with deteriorated credit quality in our December 31, 2012 financial statements following our acquisitions of Heritage and Premier in the fourth quarter of 2012. The credit metrics most heavily impacted by our acquisition of acquired non-covered loans with deteriorated credit quality in our acquisitions of Heritage and Premier were the following credit quality indicators listed in Table 9 below:

On the date of acquisition, acquired credit-impaired loans are initially recognized at fair value, which incorporates the present value of amounts estimated to be collectible. As a result of the application of this accounting methodology, certain credit-related ratios, including those referenced above, may not necessarily be directly comparable with periods prior to the acquisition of the credit-impaired non-covered loans and non-covered non-performing assets, or comparable with other institutions.

Table 9 sets forth information with respect to our non-performing non-covered assets as of ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012. As of these dates, all non-performing non-covered restructured loans are included in non-accrual non-covered loans.


	As of			As of
	March 31,			December 31,
	2013			2012			As of June 30, 2013			As of December 31, 2012
	(Dollars in thousands)						(Dollars in thousands)
Non-accrual non-covered loans	$	19,078		$	21,336		$	17,798		$	21,336
Non-covered loans past due 90 days or more (principal or interest payments)		6,692			5,937			11,514			5,937

Total non-performing non-covered loans		25,770			27,273			29,312			27,273

Other non-performing non-covered assets
Non-covered foreclosed assets held for sale, net		18,861			20,393			15,985			20,393
Other non-performing non-covered assets		285			164			172			164

Total other non-performing non-covered assets		19,146			20,557			16,157			20,557

Total non-performing non-covered assets	$	44,916		$	47,830		$	45,469		$	47,830

Allowance for loan losses for non-covered loans to non- performing non-covered loans		164.15	%		165.62	%
Allowance for loan losses for non-covered loans to non-performing non-covered loans								138.16	%		165.62	%
Non-performing non-covered loans to total non-covered loans		1.12			1.17			1.25			1.17
Non-performing non-covered assets to total non-covered assets		1.21			1.30			1.26			1.30

Note: Purchased impaired non-covered loans are not classified as non-performing non-covered assets for the recognition of interest income as the pools are considered to be performing. However, for the purpose of calculating the non-performing credit metrics presented above, the Company has included all of the non-covered loans which are contractually 90 days past due and still accruing, including those in performing pools.

Our non-performing non-covered loans are comprised of non-accrual non-covered loans and accruing non-covered loans that are contractually past due 90 days. Our bank subsidiary recognizes income principally on the accrual basis of accounting. When loans are classified as non-accrual, the accrued interest is charged off and no further interest is accrued, unless the credit characteristics of the loan improve. If a loan is determined by management to be uncollectible, the portion of the loan determined to be uncollectible is then charged to the allowance for loan losses. The Florida franchise contains approximately ~~62.8%~~72.0% and 55.6% of our non-performing non-covered loans as of ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively.

Total non-performing non-covered loans were ~~$25.8~~$29.3 million as of ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2013, compared to $27.3 million as of December 31, 2012 for ~~a decrease~~an increase of ~~$1.5~~$2.0 million. Of the ~~$1.5~~$2.0 million ~~decrease~~increase in non-performing loans, ~~$2.5~~$3.9 million is from a decrease in non-performing loans in our Arkansas market offset by a ~~$1.0~~$5.9 million increase in non-performing loans in our Florida market and noa $12,000 change in non-performing loans in Alabama. Non-performing loans at ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2013 are ~~$9.6~~approximately $8.2 million, $21.1 million and ~~$16.2 million~~$12,000 in the Arkansas, Florida and ~~Florida~~Alabama markets, respectively. ~~Alabama had zero non-performing loans at March 31, 2013.~~

Although the current state of the real estate market has improved, uncertainties still present in the national economy may continue to increase our level of non-performing non-covered loans. While we believe our allowance for loan losses is adequate at ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2013, as additional facts become known about relevant internal and external factors that affect loan collectability and our assumptions, it may result in us making additions to the provision for loan losses during 2013. Our current or historical provision levels should not be relied upon as a predictor or indicator of future levels going forward.

Troubled debt restructurings (“TDR”) generally occur when a borrower is experiencing, or is expected to experience, financial difficulties in the near term. As a result, the Bank will work with the borrower to prevent further difficulties, and ultimately to improve the likelihood of recovery on the loan.

During the recent real estate crisis, for the Nation in general and Florida in particular, it has become more common to restructure or modify the terms of certain loans under certain conditions. In those circumstances it may be beneficial to restructure the terms of a loan and work with the borrower for the benefit of both parties, versus forcing the property into foreclosure and having to dispose of it in an unfavorable and depressed real estate market. When we have modified the terms of a loan, we usually either reduce the monthly payment and/or interest rate for generally about three to twelve months. For our troubled debt restructurings that accrue interest at the time the loan is restructured, it would be a rare exception to have charged-off any portion of the loan. Only non-performing restructured loans are included in our non-performing non-covered loans. As of ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2013, we had ~~$54.1~~$53.5 million of non-covered restructured loans that are in compliance with the modified terms and are not reported as past due or non-accrual in Table 9. Our Florida market contains ~~$30.6~~$30.2 million of these non-covered restructured loans.

To facilitate this process, a loan modification that might not otherwise be considered may be granted resulting in classification as a troubled debt restructuring. These loans can involve loans remaining on non-accrual, moving to non-accrual, or continuing on an accrual status, depending on the individual facts and circumstances of the borrower. Generally, a non-accrual loan that is restructured remains on non-accrual for a period of six months to demonstrate that the borrower can meet the restructured terms. However, performance prior to the restructuring, or significant events that coincide with the restructuring, are considered in assessing whether the borrower can pay the new terms and may result in the loan being returned to an accrual status after a shorter performance period. If the borrower’s ability to meet the revised payment schedule is not reasonably assured, the loan will remain in a nonaccrual status.

The majority of the Bank’s loan modifications relate to commercial lending and involve reducing the interest rate, changing from a principal and interest payment to interest-only, a lengthening of the amortization period, or a combination of some or all of the three. In addition, it is common for the Bank to seek additional collateral or guarantor support when modifying a loan. At ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2013, the amount of troubled debt restructurings was ~~$56.9~~$55.1 million, a decrease of ~~6.6%~~9.5% from $60.9 million at December 31, 2012. ~~95.2%~~As of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, 97.1% and 94.4%, respectively, of all restructured loans were performing to the terms of the ~~restructure as of March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively.~~restructure.

Total foreclosed assets held for sale not covered by loss share were ~~$18.9~~$16.0 million as of ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2013, compared to $20.4 million as of December 31, 2012 for a decrease of ~~$1.5~~$4.4 million. The foreclosed assets held for sale not covered by loss share are comprised of ~~$6.6~~$5.4 million of assets located in Florida with the remaining ~~$12.3~~$10.6 million ~~and $17,000~~ of assets located in ~~Arkansas and Alabama, respectively.~~Arkansas. As of June 30, 2013, there were no foreclosed assets not covered by loss share in Alabama.

During the first three months of 2013, we had one non-covered foreclosed property greater than $1.0 million. This large development loan in northwest Arkansas has been in foreclosed assets since the first quarter of 2011. The carrying value was $3.7 million at ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2013. The Company does not currently anticipate any additional losses on this property. No other foreclosed assets held for sale not covered by loss share have a carrying value greater than $1.0 million.

At ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2013, total foreclosed assets held for sale were ~~$48.8~~$43.1 million. Table 10 shows the summary of foreclosed assets held for sale as of ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012.


	As of March 31, 2013						As of December 31, 2012						As of June 30, 2013						As of December 31, 2012
	Not Covered by Loss Share		Covered by FDIC Loss Share		Total		Not Covered by Loss Share		Covered by FDIC Loss Share		Total		Not Covered by Loss Share		Covered by FDIC Loss Share		Total		Not Covered by Loss Share		Covered by FDIC Loss Share		Total
	(In thousands)												(In thousands)
Commercial real estate loans
Non-farm/non-residential	$	7,537	$	8,742	$	16,279	$	7,532	$	9,024	$	16,556	$	7,664	$	8,680	$	16,344	$	7,532	$	9,024	$	16,556
Construction/land development		6,000		13,048		19,048		7,343		13,586		20,929		4,394		11,666		16,060		7,343		13,586		20,929
Agricultural		—		599		599		—		599		599		—		603		603		—		599		599
Residential real estate loans
Residential 1-4 family		5,324		7,539		12,863		5,518		8,317		13,835		3,927		6,124		10,051		5,518		8,317		13,835

Total foreclosed assets held for sale	$	18,861	$	29,928	$	48,789	$	20,393	$	31,526	$	51,919	$	15,985	$	27,073	$	43,058	$	20,393	$	31,526	$	51,919

A loan is considered impaired when it is probable that we will not receive all amounts due according to the contracted terms of the loans. Impaired loans include non-performing loans (loans past due 90 days or more and non-accrual loans), criticized and/or classified loans with a specific allocation, loans categorized as TDR’s and certain other loans identified by management that are still performing (loans included in multiple categories are only included once). As of ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2013, average non-covered impaired loans were ~~$114.9~~$107.4 million compared to $133.5 million as of December 31, 2012. As of ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2013, non-covered impaired loans were ~~$102.7~~$98.7 million compared to $127.2 million as of December 31, 2012 for a decrease of ~~$24.5~~$28.5 million. ~~A $30.6 million reduction~~This decrease is primarily associated with the improvements in loan balances ~~for both criticized and/or classified loans~~ with a specific allocation and ~~non-performing loans offset by a $6.1 million increase in impaired~~ loans categorized as ~~TDR’s as of March 31, 2013 when compared to December 31, 2012 primarily accounted for this decrease.~~TDR’s. As of ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2013, our Florida and Alabama markets accounted for approximately ~~$58.1~~$51.3 million and ~~$111,000~~$122,000 of the non-covered impaired loans, respectively.

We evaluated loans purchased in conjunction with the 2010 FDIC-assisted acquisitions and the 2012 acquisitions of Heritage and Premier for impairment in accordance with the provisions of FASB ASC Topic 310-30,Loans and Debt Securities Acquired with Deteriorated Credit Quality. Purchased loans are considered impaired if there is evidence of credit deterioration since origination and if it is probable that not all contractually required payments will be collected. All loans acquired in these transactions were deemed to be impaired loans. These loans were not classified as non-performing assets at ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, as the loans are accounted for on a pooled basis and the pools are considered to be performing. Therefore, interest income, through accretion of the difference between the carrying amount of the loans and the expected cash flows, is being recognized on all purchased impaired loans.

All non-covered loans acquired with deteriorated credit quality are considered impaired loans at the date of acquisition. Since the loans are accounted for on a pooled basis under ASC 310-30, individual loans are not classified as impaired.

Since the loans are accounted for on a pooled basis under ASC 310-30, individual loans subsequently restructured within the pools are not classified as TDRs in accordance with ASC 310-30-40. For non-covered loans acquired with deteriorated credit quality that were deemed TDRs prior to the Company’s acquisition of them, these loans are also not considered TDRs as they are accounted for under ASC 310-30.

As of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, there were no non-covered loans acquired with deteriorated credit quality on non-accrual status as a result of the loans being accounted for on the pool basis and the pools are considered to be performing for the accruing of interest income. Also, acquired loans contractually past due 90 days or more are accruing interest because the pools are considered to be performing for the purpose of accruing interest income.

Table 11 shows the summary non-accrual loans as of ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012:


	As of March 31, 2013						As of December 31, 2012						As of June 30, 2013						As of December 31, 2012
	Not Covered by Loss Share		Covered by FDIC Loss Share		Total		Not Covered by Loss Share		Covered by FDIC Loss Share		Total		Not Covered by Loss Share		Covered by FDIC Loss Share		Total		Not Covered by Loss Share		Covered by FDIC Loss Share		Total
	(In thousands)												(In thousands)
Real estate:
Commercial real estate loans
Non-farm/non-residential	$	2,743	$	—	$	2,743	$	3,659	$	—	$	3,659	$	3,456	$	—	$	3,456	$	3,659	$	—	$	3,659
Construction/land development		2,598		—		2,598		2,680		—		2,680		2,950		—		2,950		2,680		—		2,680
Agricultural		118		—		118		140		—		140		108		—		108		140		—		140
Residential real estate loans
Residential 1-4 family		10,162		—		10,162		9,972		—		9,972		9,209		—		9,209		9,972		—		9,972
Multifamily residential		1,596		—		1,596		3,215		—		3,215		340		—		340		3,215		—		3,215

Total real estate		17,217		—		17,217		19,666		—		19,666		16,063		—		16,063		19,666		—		19,666
Consumer		420		—		420		593		—		593		321		—		321		593		—		593
Commercial and industrial		1,441		—		1,441		1,077		—		1,077		1,414		—		1,414		1,077		—		1,077
Other		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—

Total non-accrual loans	$	19,078	$	—	$	19,078	$	21,336	$	—	$	21,336	$	17,798	$	—	$	17,798	$	21,336	$	—	$	21,336

If the non-accrual non-covered loans had been accruing interest in accordance with the original terms of their respective agreements, interest income of approximately ~~$333,000~~$306,000 and ~~$437,000~~$423,000 for the three-month periods ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2013 and 2012, would have been recorded. If the non-accrual non-covered loans had been accruing interest in accordance with the original terms of their respective agreements, interest income of approximately $647,000 and $832,000 for the six-month periods ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, would have been recorded. The interest income recognized on the non-covered non-accrual loans for the three-month and six-month periods ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2013 and 2012 was considered immaterial.

Table 12 shows the summary of accruing past due loans 90 days or more as of ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012:


	As of March 31, 2013						As of December 31, 2012						As of June 30, 2013						As of December 31, 2012
	Not Covered by Loss Share		Covered by FDIC Loss Share		Total		Not Covered by Loss Share		Covered by FDIC Loss Share		Total		Not Covered by Loss Share		Covered by FDIC Loss Share		Total		Not Covered by Loss Share		Covered by FDIC Loss Share		Total
	(In thousands)												(In thousands)
Real estate:
Commercial real estate loans
Non-farm/non-residential	$	2,401	$	27,135	$	29,536	$	1,437	$	32,227	$	33,664	$	5,073	$	27,484	$	32,557	$	1,437	$	32,227	$	33,664
Construction/land development		1,210		12,652		13,862		1,296		14,962		16,258		1,906		11,732		13,638		1,296		14,962		16,258
Agricultural		—		208		208		—		548		548		—		197		197		—		548		548
Residential real estate loans
Residential 1-4 family		2,456		20,909		23,365		2,589		20,005		22,594		3,601		15,685		19,286		2,589		20,005		22,594
Multifamily residential		—		351		351		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—

Total real estate		6,067		61,255		67,322		5,322		67,742		73,064		10,580		55,098		65,678		5,322		67,742		73,064
Consumer		27		—		27		95		—		95		85		—		85		95		—		95
Commercial and industrial		598		4,018		4,616		520		3,121		3,641		849		2,077		2,926		520		3,121		3,641
Other														—		656		656		—		—		—

Total loans accruing past due 90 days or more	$	6,692	$	65,273	$	71,965	$	5,937	$	70,863	$	76,800	$	11,514	$	57,831	$	69,345	$	5,937	$	70,863	$	76,800

The Company’s total past due and non-accrual covered loans to total covered loans was ~~18.2%~~17.5% and 18.4% as of ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively.

Overview. The allowance for loan losses for non-covered loans is maintained at a level which our management believes is adequate to absorb all probable losses on loans in the loan portfolio. The amount of the allowance is affected by: (i) loan charge-offs, which decrease the allowance; (ii) recoveries on loans previously charged off, which increase the allowance; and (iii) the provision of possible loan losses charged to income, which increases the allowance. In determining the provision for possible loan losses, it is necessary for our management to monitor fluctuations in the allowance resulting from actual charge-offs and recoveries and to periodically review the size and composition of the loan portfolio in light of current and anticipated economic conditions. If actual losses exceed the amount of allowance for loan losses for non-covered loans, our earnings could be adversely affected.

As we evaluate the allowance for loan losses for non-covered loans, we categorize it as follows: (i) specific allocations; (ii) allocations for criticized and classified assets with no specific allocation; (iii) general allocations for each major loan category; and (iv) miscellaneous allocations.

Specific Allocations.As a general rule, if a specific allocation is warranted, it is the result of an analysis of a previously classified credit or relationship. Typically, when it becomes evident through the payment history or a financial statement review that a loan or relationship is no longer supported by the cash flows of the asset and/or borrower and has become collateral dependent, we will use appraisals or other collateral analysis to determine if collateral impairment has occurred. The amount or likelihood of loss on this credit may not yet be evident, so a charge-off would not be prudent. However, if the analysis indicates that an impairment has occurred, then a specific allocation will be determined for this loan. If our existing appraisal is outdated or the collateral has been subject to significant market changes, we will obtain a new appraisal for this impairment analysis. The majority of the Company’s impaired loans are collateral dependent at the present time, so third-party appraisals were used to determine the necessary impairment for these loans. Cash flow available to service debt was used for the other impaired loans. This analysis is performed each quarter in connection with the preparation of the analysis of the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses for non-covered loans, and if necessary, adjustments are made to the specific allocation provided for a particular loan.

For collateral dependent loans, we do not consider an appraisal outdated simply due to the passage of time. However, if market or other conditions have deteriorated and we believe that the current market value of the property is not within approximately 20% of the appraised value, we will consider the appraisal outdated and order a new appraisal for the impairment analysis. The recognition of any provision or related charge-off on a collateral dependent loan is either through annual credit analysis or, many times, when the relationship becomes delinquent. If the borrower is not current, we will update our credit and cash flow analysis to determine the borrower’s repayment ability. If we determine this ability does not exist and it appears that the collection of the entire principal and interest is not likely, then the loan could be placed on non-accrual status. In any case, loans are classified as non-accrual no later than 105 days past due. If the loan requires a quarterly impairment analysis, this analysis is completed in conjunction with the completion of the analysis of the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses for non-covered loans. Any exposure identified through the impairment analysis is shown as a specific reserve on the individual impairment. If it is determined that a new appraisal is required, it is ordered and will be taken into consideration during the next completion of the impairment analysis.

Between the receipt of the original appraisal and the updated appraisal, we monitor the loan’s repayment history and subject the loan to examination by our internal loan review. If the loan is over $1.0 million, our policy requires an annual credit review. In addition, we update all financial information and calculate the global repayment ability of the borrower/guarantors.

In estimating the net realizable value of the collateral, management may deem it appropriate to discount the appraisal based on the applicable circumstances. In such case, the amount charged off may result in loan principal outstanding being below fair value as presented in the appraisal.

As a general rule, when it becomes evident that the full principal and accrued interest of a loan may not be collected, or by law at 105 days past due, we will reflect that loan as non-performing. It will remain non-performing until it performs in a manner that it is reasonable to expect that we will collect the full principal and accrued interest.

When the amount or likelihood of a loss on a loan has been determined, a charge-off should be taken in the period it is determined. If a partial charge-off occurs, the quarterly impairment analysis will determine if the loan is still impaired, and thus continues to require a specific allocation.

Allocations for Criticized and Classified Assets not Individually Evaluated for Impairment. We establish allocations for loans rated “special mention” through “loss” in accordance with the guidelines established by the regulatory agencies. A percentage rate is applied to each loan category to determine the level of dollar allocation.

General Allocations. We establish general allocations for each major loan category. This section also includes allocations to loans, which are collectively evaluated for loss such as residential real estate, commercial real estate, consumer loans and commercial and industrial loans. The allocations in this section are based on a historical review of loan loss experience and past due accounts. We give consideration to trends, changes in loan mix, delinquencies, prior losses, and other related information.

Miscellaneous Allocations. Allowance allocations other than specific, classified, and general are included in our miscellaneous section.

Loans Collectively Evaluated for Impairment. Non-covered loans collectively evaluated for impairment increased organically by approximately $74.1 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2013 from $1.94 billion at December 31, 2012 to $2.02 billion at June 30, 2013. The percentage of the allowance for loan losses for non-covered loans allocated to non-covered loans collectively evaluated for impairment to the total non-covered loans collectively evaluated for impairment increased from 0.81% at December 31, 2012 to 1.14% at June 30, 2013. This increase is the result of the normal changes associated with the calculation of the allocation of the allowance for loan losses and includes routine changes from the previous year end reporting period such as organic loan growth, unallocated allowance, individual loan impairments, asset quality and net charge-offs.

Charge-offs and Recoveries. Total charge-offs increased to ~~$3.3~~$3.4 million and $6.7 million for the three months and six months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2013, respectively, compared to ~~$1.5~~$1.6 million and $3.1 million for the same ~~period~~periods in ~~2012.~~2012, respectively. Total recoveries increased to ~~$450,000~~$807,000 and $1.3 million for the three months and six months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2013, respectively, compared to ~~$354,000~~$433,000 and $787,000 for the same ~~period~~periods in 2012. For the three months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2013, the net charge-offs were ~~$1.7~~$2.5 million for Arkansas, ~~$1.2 million~~$52,000 for Florida and ~~$3,000~~$8,000 for Alabama, respectively, equaling a net charge-off position of ~~$2.9~~$2.6 million. For the six months ended June 30, 2013, the net charge-offs were $4.2 million for Arkansas, $1.2 million for Florida and $11,000 for Alabama, respectively, equaling a net charge-off position of $5.4 million.

During the ~~first~~second quarter of 2013, there were ~~$3.3~~$3.4 million in charge-offs and ~~$450,000~~$807,000 in recoveries. During the first six months of 2013, there were $6.7 million in charge-offs and $1.3 million in recoveries. While the charge-offs and recoveries consisted of many relationships, there ~~were no~~was only one individual ~~relationships~~relationship consisting of charge-offs greater than $1.0 million. This was an Arkansas relationship consisting of real estate loans totaling $3.0 million of debt. The total amount of charge-offs related to these loans was $1.8 million, which consists of approximately $517,000 of residential 1-4 family, $1.3 million of multifamily residential and $46,000 of non-farm/non-residential during the second quarter of 2013.

We have not charged off an amount less than what was determined to be the fair value of the collateral as presented in the appraisal (for collateral dependent loans) for any period presented. Loans partially charged-off are placed on non-accrual status until it is proven that the borrower’s repayment ability with respect to the remaining principal balance can be reasonably assured. This is usually established over a period of 6-12 months of timely payment performance.

Table 13 shows the allowance for loan losses, charge-offs and recoveries for non-covered loans as of and for the three-month and six-month periods ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2013 and 2012.


	Three Months Ended March 31,						Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2013			2012			2013			2012			2013			2012
	(Dollars in thousands)						(Dollars in thousands)
Balance, beginning of period	$	45,170		$	52,129		$	42,302		$	51,014		$	45,170		$	52,129
Loans charged off
Real estate:
Commercial real estate loans:
Non-farm/non-residential		245			59			619			212			864			271
Construction/land development		118			46			50			267			168			313
Agricultural		—			—			—			—			—			—
Residential real estate loans:
Residential 1-4 family		1,027			620			899			480			1,926			1,100
Multifamily residential		1,026			95			1,265			—			2,291			95

Total real estate		2,416			820			2,833			959			5,249			1,779
Consumer		602			201			86			370			688			571
Commercial and industrial		35			206			146			3			181			209
Agricultural		—			—			—			—			—			—
Other		265			242			296			269			561			511

Total loans charged off		3,318			1,469			3,361			1,601			6,679			3,070

Recoveries of loans previously charged off
Real estate:
Commercial real estate loans:
Non-farm/non-residential		17			13			96			26			113			39
Construction/land development		15			4			—			3			15			7
Agricultural		—			11			—			222			—			233
Residential real estate loans:
Residential 1-4 family		114			40			542			65			656			105
Multifamily residential		66			—			4			3			70			3

Total real estate		212			68			642			319			854			387
Consumer		42			52			48			16			90			68
Commercial and industrial		15			80			18			7			33			87
Agricultural		—			—			—			—			—			—
Other		181			154			99			91			280			245

Total recoveries		450			354			807			433			1,257			787

Net loans charged off (recovered)		2,868			1,115			2,554			1,168			5,422			2,283
Provision for loan losses for non-covered loans		—			—			750			—			750			—

Balance, March 31	$	42,302		$	51,014
Balance, June 30							$	40,498		$	49,846		$	40,498		$	49,846

Discount for credit losses on non-covered loans acquired	$	80,305		$	17,154
Net charge-offs (recoveries) on loans not covered by loss share to average non-covered loans		0.50	%		0.23	%		0.44	%		0.23	%		0.47	%		0.23	%
Allowance for loan losses for non-covered loans to period end non-covered loans		1.83			2.49			1.73			2.45			1.73			2.45
Allowance for loan losses for non-covered loans plus discount for credit losses on non-covered loans acquired to total non-covered loans plus discount for credit losses on non-covered loans acquired		5.13			3.30
Allowance for loan losses for non-covered loans to net charge-offs (recoveries)		364			1,138			395			1,061			370			1,086

Allocated Allowance for Loan Losses for Non-Covered Loans. We use a risk rating and specific reserve methodology in the calculation and allocation of our allowance for loan losses for non-covered loans. While the allowance is allocated to various loan categories in assessing and evaluating the level of the allowance, the allowance is available to cover charge-offs incurred in all loan categories. Because a portion of our portfolio has not matured to the degree necessary to obtain reliable loss data from which to calculate estimated future losses, the unallocated portion of the allowance is an integral component of the total allowance. Although unassigned to a particular credit relationship or product segment, this portion of the allowance is vital to safeguard against the imprecision inherent in estimating credit losses.

The changes for the period ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2013 and the year ended December 31, 2012 in the allocation of the allowance for loan losses for non-covered loans for the individual types of loans are primarily associated with changes in the ASC 310 calculations, both individual and aggregate, and changes in the ASC 450 calculations. These calculations are affected by changes in individual loan impairments, changes in asset quality, net charge-offs during the period and normal changes in the outstanding loan portfolio, as well any changes to the general allocation factors due to changes within the actual characteristics of the loan portfolio.

Table 14 presents the allocation of allowance for loan losses for non-covered loans as of ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012.


	As of March 31, 2013					As of December 31, 2012					As of June 30, 2013					As of December 31, 2012
	Allowance Amount		% of loans(1)			Allowance Amount		% of loans(1)			Allowance Amount		% of loans⁽¹⁾			Allowance Amount		% of loans⁽¹⁾
	(Dollars in thousands)										(Dollars in thousands)
Real estate:
Commercial real estate loans:
Non-farm/non-residential	$	18,246		43.9	%	$	19,781		43.7	%	$	17,925		42.9	%	$	19,781		43.7	%
Construction/land development		6,197		11.0			5,816		10.9			6,456		12.0			5,816		10.9
Agricultural		265		1.5			193		1.4			236		1.3			193		1.4
Residential real estate loans:
Residential 1-4 family		6,468		23.0			10,467		23.6			6,000		22.6			10,467		23.6
Multifamily residential		3,361		5.3			3,346		5.6			2,415		5.2			3,346		5.6

Total real estate		34,537		84.7			39,603		85.2			33,032		84.0			39,603		85.2
Consumer		620		1.5			894		1.6			522		1.4			894		1.6
Commercial and industrial		2,827		11.7			3,870		11.0			2,697		12.3			3,870		11.0
Agricultural		417		0.7			394		0.8			531		1.1			394		0.8
Other		—		1.4			—		1.4			—		1.2			—		1.4
Unallocated		3,901		—			409		—			3,716		—			409		—

Total	$	42,302		100.0	%	$	45,170		100.0	%	$	40,498		100.0	%	$	45,170		100.0	%

Allowance for loan losses for covered loans were ~~$3.6 million~~$952,000 and $5.5 million at ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively.

Total charge-offs increased to ~~$1.8~~$3.2 million for the three months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2013, compared to zero for the same period in 2012. Total recoveries increased to ~~$11,000~~$6,000 for the three months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2013, compared to zero for the same period in 2012. There was no$100,000 and $1.3 million of provision for loan ~~loss~~losses taken on covered loans during the three months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

Total charge-offs increased to $5.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2013, compared to zero for the same period in 2012. Total recoveries increased to $17,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2013, compared to zero for the same period in 2012. There was $100,000 and $1.3 million of provision for loan losses taken on covered loans during the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

Our securities portfolio is the second largest component of earning assets and provides a significant source of revenue. Securities within the portfolio are classified as held-to-maturity, available-for-sale, or trading based on the intent and objective of the investment and the ability to hold to maturity. Fair values of securities are based on quoted market prices where available. If quoted market prices are not available, estimated fair values are based on quoted market prices of comparable securities. As of ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, we had no held-to-maturity or trading securities.

Securities available-for-sale are reported at fair value with unrealized holding gains and losses reported as a separate component of stockholders’ equity as other comprehensive income. Securities that are held as available-for-sale are used as a part of our asset/liability management strategy. Securities may be sold in response to interest rate changes, changes in prepayment risk, the need to increase regulatory capital, and other similar factors are classified as available-for-sale. Available-for-sale securities were ~~$724.9~~$736.4 million as of ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2013, compared to $726.2 million as of December 31, 2012. The estimated effective duration of our securities portfolio was ~~3.0~~3.3 years as of ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2013.

As of ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2013, ~~$323.7~~$306.5 million, or ~~44.7%~~41.6%, of our available-for-sale securities were invested in mortgage-backed securities, compared to $325.3 million, or 44.8%, of our available-for-sale securities as of December 31, 2012. To reduce our income tax burden, ~~$186.3~~$196.1 million, or ~~25.7%~~26.6%, of our available-for-sale securities portfolio as of ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2013, was primarily invested in tax-exempt obligations of state and political subdivisions, compared to $190.6 million, or 26.3%, of our available-for-sale securities as of December 31, 2012. Also, we had approximately ~~$191.7~~$196.3 million, or ~~26.4%~~26.7%, invested in obligations of U.S. Government-sponsored enterprises as of ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2013, compared to $190.7 million, or 26.3%, of our available-for-sale securities as of December 31, 2012.

Certain investment securities are valued at less than their historical cost. These declines are primarily the result of the rate for these investments yielding less than current market rates. Based on evaluation of available evidence, we believe the declines in fair value for these securities are temporary. It is our intent to hold these securities to recovery. Should the impairment of any of these securities become other than temporary, the cost basis of the investment will be reduced and the resulting loss recognized in net income in the period the other than temporary impairment is identified.

See Note 3 “Investment Securities” to the Condensed Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for the carrying value and fair value of investment securities.

Our deposits averaged ~~$3.43~~$3.38 billion and $3.41 billion for the three-month ~~period~~and six-month periods ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2013. Total deposits decreased ~~$18.0~~$158.2 million, or aan annualized decrease of ~~0.52%~~9.16%, to ~~$3.47~~$3.33 billion as of ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2013, from $3.48 billion as of December 31, 2012. Deposits are our primary source of funds. We offer a variety of products designed to attract and retain deposit customers. Those products consist of checking accounts, regular savings deposits, NOW accounts, money market accounts and certificates of deposit. Deposits are gathered from individuals, partnerships and corporations in our market areas. In addition, we obtain deposits from state and local entities and, to a lesser extent, U.S. Government and other depository institutions.

Our policy also permits the acceptance of brokered deposits. As of ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, brokered deposits were ~~$51.9~~$26.0 million and $56.9 million, respectively. Included in these brokered deposits are ~~$42.9~~$21.8 million and $52.5 million of Certificate of Deposit Account Registry Service (CDARS) as of ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively. CDARS are deposits of our customers we have swapped with other institutions. This gives our customers the potential for FDIC insurance of up to $50 million.

The interest rates paid are competitively priced for each particular deposit product and structured to meet our funding requirements. We will continue to manage interest expense through deposit pricing. We may allow higher rate deposits to run off during this current period of limited loan demand. We believe that additional funds can be attracted and deposit growth can be realized through deposit pricing if we experience increased loan demand or other liquidity needs.

Table 15 reflects the classification of the average deposits and the average rate paid on each deposit category, which is in excess of 10 percent of average total deposits, for the three-month and six-month periods ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2013 and 2012.


	Three Months Ended March 31,										Three Months Ended June 30,
	2013					2012					2013					2012
	Average Amount		Average Rate Paid			Average Amount		Average Rate Paid			Average Amount		Average Rate Paid			Average Amount		Average Rate Paid
	(Dollars in thousands)										(Dollars in thousands)
Non-interest-bearing transaction accounts	$	668,222		—	%	$	497,634		—	%	$	704,847		—	%	$	559,554		—	%
Interest-bearing transaction accounts		1,567,727		0.20			1,177,442		0.29			1,561,306		0.18			1,353,916		0.28
Savings deposits		203,904		0.11			150,697		0.45			217,963		0.09			165,235		0.17
Time deposits:
$100,000 or more		524,816		0.75			741,063		1.34			469,946		0.94			682,545		1.03
Other time deposits		461,971		0.61			500,147		0.95			430,863		0.27			546,219		1.04

Total	$	3,426,640		0.29	%	$	3,066,983		0.61	%	$	3,384,925		0.25	%	$	3,307,469		0.51	%

We enter into short-term purchases of securities under agreements to resell (resale agreements) and sales of securities under agreements to repurchase (repurchase agreements) of substantially identical securities. The amounts advanced under resale agreements and the amounts borrowed under repurchase agreements are carried on the balance sheet at the amount advanced. Interest incurred on repurchase agreements is reported as interest expense. Securities sold under agreements to repurchase increased ~~$10.9~~$7.2 million, or ~~16.5%~~10.8%, from $66.3 million as of December 31, 2012 to ~~$77.2~~$73.5 million as of ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2013.

Our FHLB borrowed funds were $130.3 million and $130.4 million at ~~both March 31,~~June 30, 2013 and December 31, ~~2012.~~2012, respectively. All of the outstanding balance for ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012 were issued as long-term advances. Our remaining FHLB borrowing capacity was ~~$759.3~~$753.1 million and $640.5 million as of ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively. Expected maturities will differ from contractual maturities, because FHLB may have the right to call or prepay certain obligations.

Subordinated debentures, which consist of guaranteed payments on trust preferred securities, were $3.1 million and $28.9 million as of ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively.

Presently, the funds raised from the trust preferred offerings qualify as Tier 1 capital for regulatory purposes, subject to the applicable limit, with the balance qualifying as Tier 2 capital. The Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System recently announced the planned implementation of Basel III capital rules. Under these rules trust preferred securities will be phased out as Tier 1 capital for future periods.

As of December 31, 2012, the Company held $28.9 million of trust preferred securities currently callable without penalty based on the terms of the specific agreements. Since these trust preferred securities are being phased out of Tier 1 capital, we have decided to begin the process of redeeming these instruments. During the first quarter of 2013, we redeemed approximately $25.8 million in trust preferred securities. WeAs a result of the Liberty acquisition, we are ~~evaluating~~not projecting the ~~remaining $3.1 million subordinated debenture and may pay off~~Company to pay-off the remaining balance during 2013.

Stockholders’ equity was ~~$528.4~~$533.5 million at ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2013 compared to $515.5 million at December 31, 2012, an increase of ~~2.5%~~3.5%. As of ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012 our equity to asset ratio was ~~12.5%~~13.0% and 12.2% respectively. Book value per share was ~~$18.79~~$9.49 at ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2013 compared to ~~$18.34~~$9.17 (split adjusted) at December 31, 2012, a ~~10.0%~~7.0% annualized increase.

Common Stock Cash Dividends. We declared cash dividends on our common stock of ~~$0.13~~$0.075 per share and ~~$0.10~~$0.05 per share for the three-month periods ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2013 and 2012 and $0.14 and $0.10 per share for the six-month periods ended June 30, 2013 and 2012. The common stock dividend payout ratio for the three months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2013 and 2012 was ~~20.8%~~23.88% and ~~19.5%~~18.14%, respectively. The common stock dividend payout ratio for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012 was 22.36% and 18.81%, respectively. For the ~~second~~third quarter of 2013, the Board of Directors declared a regular ~~$0.15~~$0.075 per share quarterly cash dividend payable ~~June 5,~~September 4, 2013, to shareholders of record ~~May 15,~~August 14, 2013.

Two-for-One Stock Split. On April 18, 2013, our Board of Directors declared a two-for-one stock split ~~to be~~ paid in the form of a 100% stock dividend on June 12, 2013 (the “Payment Date”) to shareholders of record at the close of business on May 22, 2013. The additional shares ~~will be~~were distributed by the Company’s transfer agent, Computershare, and the Company’s common stock ~~is expected to begin~~began trading on a split-adjusted basis on the NASDAQ Global Select Market on ~~or about~~ June 13, 2013. The stock split ~~is expected to increase~~increased the Company’s total shares of common stock outstanding as of ~~April 18,~~June 12, 2013 from ~~approximately 28,116,000~~28,121,596 shares to ~~approximately 56,232,000~~56,243,192 shares.

All previously reported share and per share ~~data included in filings subsequent to the Payment Date will be~~amounts have been restated to reflect the retroactive effect of ~~this two-for-one~~the stock split.

Risk-Based Capital. We as well as our bank subsidiary are subject to various regulatory capital requirements administered by the federal banking agencies. Failure to meet minimum capital requirements can initiate certain mandatory and other discretionary actions by regulators that, if enforced, could have a direct material effect on our financial statements. Under capital adequacy guidelines and the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action, we must meet specific capital guidelines that involve quantitative measures of our assets, liabilities and certain off-balance-sheet items as calculated under regulatory accounting practices. Our capital amounts and classifications are also subject to qualitative judgments by the regulators as to components, risk weightings and other factors.

Quantitative measures established by regulation to ensure capital adequacy require us to maintain minimum amounts and ratios (set forth in the table below) of total and Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets, and of Tier 1 capital to average assets. Management believes that, as of ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, we met all regulatory capital adequacy requirements to which we were subject.

Table 16 presents our risk-based capital ratios as of ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012.


	As of March 31, 2013			As of December 31, 2012			As of June 30, 2013			As of December 31, 2012
	(Dollars in thousands)						(Dollars in thousands)
Tier 1 capital
Stockholders’ equity	$	528,395		$	515,473		$	533,510		$	515,473
Qualifying trust preferred securities		3,000			28,000			3,000			28,000
Goodwill and core deposit intangibles, net		(96,032	)		(96,785	)		(95,279	)		(96,785	)
Unrealized (gain) loss on available-for-sale securities		(10,643	)		(12,001	)		(1,981	)		(12,001	)
Deferred tax assets		—			(3,529	)		(2,730	)		(3,529	)

Total Tier 1 capital		424,720			431,158			436,520			431,158

Tier 2 capital
Qualifying allowance for loan losses		38,607			38,807			38,909			38,807
Qualifying unrealized gains on available-for-sale securities		27			—

Total Tier 2 capital		38,634			38,807			38,909			38,807

Total risk-based capital	$	463,354		$	469,965		$	475,429		$	469,965

Average total assets for leverage ratio	$	4,096,861		$	3,939,206		$	4,049,476		$	3,939,206

Risk weighted assets	$	3,081,214		$	3,092,707		$	3,110,196		$	3,092,707

Ratios at end of period
Leverage ratio		10.37	%		10.95	%		10.78	%		10.95	%
Tier 1 risk-based capital		13.78			13.94			14.04			13.94
Total risk-based capital		15.04			15.20			15.29			15.20
Minimum guidelines
Leverage ratio		4.00	%		4.00	%		4.00	%		4.00	%
Tier 1 risk-based capital		4.00			4.00			4.00			4.00
Total risk-based capital		8.00			8.00			8.00			8.00

As of the most recent notification from regulatory agencies, our bank subsidiary was “well-capitalized” under the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action. To be categorized as “well-capitalized”, our banking subsidiary and we must maintain minimum leverage, Tier 1 risk-based capital, and total risk-based capital ratios as set forth in the table. There are no conditions or events since that notification that we believe have changed the bank subsidiary’s category.

We had ~~$96.9~~$96.1 million, $97.7 million, and ~~$88.3~~$87.6 million total goodwill, core deposit intangibles and other intangible assets as of ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2013, December 31, 2012 and ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2012, respectively. Because of our level of intangible assets and related amortization expenses, management believes diluted earnings per common share excluding intangible amortization, tangible book value per common share, return on average assets excluding intangible amortization, return on average tangible common equity excluding intangible amortization and tangible common equity to tangible assets are useful in evaluating our company. These calculations, which are similar to the GAAP calculation of diluted earnings per common share, book value, return on average assets, return on average common equity, and common equity to assets, are presented in Tables 17 through 21, respectively.


	Three Months Ended March 31,				Three Months Ended June 30,				Six Months Ended June 30,
	2013		2012		2013		2012		2013		2012
	(In thousands, except per share data)				(In thousands, except per share data)
GAAP net income available to common stockholders	$	17,548	$	14,498	$	17,659	$	15,490	$	35,207	$	29,988
Intangible amortization after-tax		487		383		488		422		975		805

Earnings available to common stockholders excluding intangible amortization	$	18,035	$	14,881	$	18,147	$	15,912	$	36,182	$	30,793

GAAP diluted earnings per common share	$	0.62	$	0.51	$	0.31	$	0.27	$	0.62	$	0.53
Intangible amortization after-tax		0.02		0.01		0.01		0.01		0.02		0.01

Diluted earnings per common share excluding intangible amortization	$	0.64	$	0.52	$	0.32	$	0.28	$	0.64	$	0.54


	As of March 31, 2013		As of December 31, 2012		As of June 30, 2013		As of December 31, 2012
	(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)				(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
Book value per common share: A/B	$	18.79	$	18.34	$	9.49	$	9.17
Tangible book value per common share: (A-C-D)/B		15.35		14.86		7.78		7.43
(A) Total common equity	$	528,395	$	515,473	$	533,510	$	515,473
(B) Common shares outstanding		28,114		28,107		56,243		56,213
(C) Goodwill	$	85,681	$	85,681	$	85,681	$	85,681
(D) Core deposit and other intangibles		11,259		12,061		10,457		12,061

Table 19: ~~Annualized~~ Return on Average Assets Excluding Intangible Amortization


	Three Months Ended March 31,						Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2013			2012			2013			2012			2013			2012
	(Dollars in thousands)						(Dollars in thousands)
Return on average assets: A/C		1.70	%		1.52	%		1.71	%		1.53	%		1.70	%		1.53	%
Return on average assets excluding intangible amortization: B/(C-D)		1.79			1.60			1.80			1.61			1.79			1.60
(A) Net income	$	17,548		$	14,498
(A) Net income available to all stockholders							$	17,659		$	15,490		$	35,207		$	29,988
Intangible amortization after-tax		487			383			488			422			975			805

(B) Earnings excluding intangible amortization	$	18,035		$	14,881		$	18,147		$	15,912		$	36,182		$	30,793

(C) Average assets	$	4,192,893		$	3,826,615		$	4,147,485		$	4,072,261		$	4,169,970		$	3,949,393
(D) Average goodwill, core deposits and other intangible assets		97,332			79,460			96,526			87,909			96,927			83,684

Table 20: ~~Annualized~~ Return on Average Tangible Common Equity Excluding Intangible Amortization


	Three Months Ended March 31,						Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2013			2012			2013			2012			2013			2012
	(Dollars in thousands)						(Dollars in thousands)
Return on average common equity: A/C		13.68	%		12.21	%		13.27	%		12.80	%		13.47	%		12.51	%
Return on average tangible common equity excluding intangible amortization: B/(C-D)		17.29			15.03			16.65			16.05			16.97			15.54
(A) Net income available to common stockholders	$	17,548		$	14,498		$	17,659		$	15,490		$	35,207		$	29,988
(B) Earnings available to common stockholders excluding intangible amortization after-tax		18,035			14,881
(B) Earnings available to common stockholders excluding intangible amortization								18,147			15,912			36,182			30,793
(C) Average common equity		520,295			477,544			533,646			486,651			527,008			482,098
(D) Average goodwill, core deposits and other intangible assets		97,332			79,460			96,526			87,909			96,927			83,684


	As of March 31, 2013			As of December 31, 2012			As of June 30, 2013			As of December 31, 2012
	(Dollars in thousands)						(Dollars in thousands)
Equity to assets: B/A		12.50	%		12.15	%		13.04	%		12.15	%
Tangible equity to tangible assets: (B-C-D)/(A-C-D)		10.45			10.08
Tangible common equity to tangible assets: (B-C-D)/(A-C-D)								10.95			10.08
(A) Total assets	$	4,225,507		$	4,242,130		$	4,091,337		$	4,242,130
(B) Total equity		528,395			515,473			533,510			515,473
(C) Goodwill		85,681			85,681			85,681			85,681
(D) Core deposit and other intangibles		11,259			12,061			10,457			12,061

We have $523.0 million of purchased non-covered loans, which includes $80.3 million of discount for credit losses on non-covered loans acquired at June 30, 2013. We had $569.7 million of purchased non-covered loans, which included $81.7 million of discount for credit losses on non-covered loans acquired at December 31, 2012. For purchased credit-impaired financial assets, GAAP requires a discount embedded in the purchase price that is attributable to the expected credit losses at the date of acquisition, which is a different approach from non-purchased-credit-impaired assets. While the discount for credit losses on purchased non-covered loans is not available for credit losses on non-purchased non-covered loans, management believes it is useful information to show the same accounting as if applied to all loans, including those acquired in a business combination. Therefore, management believes the allowance for loan losses for non-covered loans plus discount for credit losses on non-covered loans acquired to total non-covered loans plus discount for credit losses on non-covered loans acquired is useful in evaluating our Company. This calculation, which is similar to the GAAP calculation of allowance for loan losses for non-covered loans to total non-covered loans, is presented in Table 22 below.

Table 22: Allowance for Loan Losses for Non-Covered Loans to Total Non-Covered Loans

Note: Discount for credit losses on purchased credit impaired loans acquired are accounted for on a pool by pool basis and are not available to cover credit losses on non-acquired loans or other pools.


	As of December 31, 2012
	Non-Covered Loans			Purchased Non-Covered Loans			Total
	(Dollars in thousands)
Loan balance reported (A)	$	1,843,249		$	487,950		$	2,331,199
Loan balance reported plus discount (B)		1,843,249			569,667			2,412,916
Allowance for loan losses for non-covered loans (C)	$	45,170		$	—		$	45,170
Discount for credit losses on non-covered loans acquired (D)		—			81,717			81,717

Total allowance for loan losses for non-covered loans plus discount for credit losses on non-covered loans acquired (E)	$	45,170		$	81,717		$	126,887

Allowance for loan losses for non-covered loans to total non-covered loans (C/A)		2.45	%		N/A			1.94	%
Discount for credit losses on non-covered loans acquired to non-covered loans acquired plus discount for credit losses on non-covered loans acquired (D/B)		N/A			14.34	%		N/A
Allowance for loan losses for non-covered loans plus discount for credit losses on non-covered loans acquired to total non-covered loans plus discount for credit losses on non-covered loans acquired (E/B)		N/A			N/A			5.26	%

See Note 22 to the Condensed Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for a discussion of certain recently issued and recently adopted accounting pronouncements.

Liquidity Management. Liquidity refers to the ability or the financial flexibility to manage future cash flows to meet the needs of depositors and borrowers and fund operations. Maintaining appropriate levels of liquidity allows us to have sufficient funds available for reserve requirements, customer demand for loans, withdrawal of deposit balances and maturities of deposits and other liabilities. Our primary source of liquidity at our holding company is dividends paid by our bank subsidiary. Applicable statutes and regulations impose restrictions on the amount of dividends that may be declared by our bank subsidiary. Further, any dividend payments are subject to the continuing ability of the bank subsidiary to maintain compliance with minimum federal regulatory capital requirements and to retain its characterization under federal regulations as a “well-capitalized” institution.

Our bank subsidiary has potential obligations resulting from the issuance of standby letters of credit and commitments to fund future borrowings to our loan customers. Many of these obligations and commitments to fund future borrowings to our ~~loans~~loan customers are expected to expire without being drawn upon, therefore the total commitment amounts do not necessarily represent future cash requirements affecting our liquidity position.

Liquidity needs can be met from either assets or liabilities. On the asset side, our primary sources of liquidity include cash and due from banks, federal funds sold, available-for-sale investment securities and scheduled repayments and maturities of loans. We maintain adequate levels of cash and cash equivalents to meet our day-to-day needs. As of ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2013, our cash and cash equivalents were ~~$302.4~~$172.7 million, or ~~7.2%~~4.2% of total assets, compared to $231.9 million, or 5.5% of total assets, as of December 31, 2012. Our investment securities and federal funds sold were ~~$727.8~~$738.9 million as of ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2013 and $743.4 million as of December 31, 2012.

Our investment portfolio is comprised of approximately ~~64.0%~~66.1% or ~~$460.8~~$486.7 million of securities which mature in less than five years. As of ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, ~~$543.0~~$538.4 million and $532.8 million, respectively, of securities were pledged as collateral for various public fund deposits and securities sold under agreements to repurchase.

On the liability side, our principal sources of liquidity are deposits, borrowed funds, and access to capital markets. Customer deposits are our largest sources of funds. As of ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2013, our total deposits were ~~$3.47~~$3.33 billion, or ~~82.0%~~81.3% of total assets, compared to $3.48 billion, or 82.1% of total assets, as of December 31, 2012. We attract our deposits primarily from individuals, business, and municipalities located in our market areas.

We may occasionally use our Fed funds lines of credit in order to temporarily satisfy short-term liquidity needs. We have Fed funds lines with three other financial institutions pursuant to which we could have borrowed up to $35.0 million on an unsecured basis as of ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012. These lines may be terminated by the respective lending institutions at any time.

We also maintain lines of credit with the Federal Home Loan Bank. Our FHLB borrowed funds were $130.3 million and $130.4 million at ~~both March 31,~~June 30, 2013 and December 31, ~~2012.~~2012, respectively. All of the 2013 and 2012 outstanding balances were issued as long-term advances. Our FHLB borrowing capacity was ~~$759.3~~$753.1 million and $640.5 million as of ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2013 and December 31, ~~2012.~~2012, respectively.

Market Risk Management. Our primary component of market risk is interest rate volatility. Fluctuations in interest rates will ultimately impact both the level of income and expense recorded on a large portion of our assets and liabilities, and the market value of all interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities, other than those which possess a short term to maturity. We do not hold market risk sensitive instruments for trading purposes.

Asset/Liability Management. Our management actively measures and manages interest rate risk. The asset/liability committees of the boards of directors of our holding company and bank subsidiary are also responsible for approving our asset/liability management policies, overseeing the formulation and implementation of strategies to improve balance sheet positioning and earnings, and reviewing our interest rate sensitivity position.

One of the tools that our management uses to measure short-term interest rate risk is a net interest income simulation model. This analysis calculates the difference between net interest income forecasted using base market rates and using a rising and a falling interest rate scenario. The income simulation model includes various assumptions regarding the re-pricing relationships for each of our products. Many of our assets are floating rate loans, which are assumed to re-price immediately, and proportional to the change in market rates, depending on their contracted index. Some loans and investments include the opportunity of prepayment (embedded options), and accordingly the simulation model uses indexes to estimate these prepayments and reinvest their proceeds at current yields. Our non-term deposit products re-price more slowly, usually changing less than the change in market rates and at our discretion.

This analysis indicates the impact of changes in net interest income for the given set of rate changes and assumptions. It assumes the balance sheet remains static and that its structure does not change over the course of the year. It does not account for all factors that impact this analysis, including changes by management to mitigate the impact of interest rate changes or secondary impacts such as changes to our credit risk profile as interest rates change.

Furthermore, loan prepayment rate estimates and spread relationships change regularly. Interest rate changes create changes in actual loan prepayment rates that will differ from the market estimates incorporated in this analysis. Changes that vary significantly from the assumptions may have significant effects on our net interest income.

Interest Rate Sensitivity. Our primary business is banking and the resulting earnings, primarily net interest income, are susceptible to changes in market interest rates. It is management’s goal to maximize net interest income within acceptable levels of interest rate and liquidity risks.

A key element in the financial performance of financial institutions is the level and type of interest rate risk assumed. The single most significant measure of interest rate risk is the relationship of the repricing periods of earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities. The more closely the repricing periods are correlated, the less interest rate risk we assume. We use repricing gap and simulation modeling as the primary methods in analyzing and managing interest rate risk.

Gap analysis attempts to capture the amounts and timing of balances exposed to changes in interest rates at a given point in time. Our gap position as of ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2013 was asset sensitive with a one-year cumulative repricing gap of ~~9.4%~~6.1%. During these periods, the amount of change our asset base realizes in relation to the total change in market interest rate exceeds that of the liability base.

We have a portion of our securities portfolio invested in mortgage-backed securities. Mortgage-backed securities are included based on their final maturity date. Expected maturities may differ from contractual maturities because borrowers may have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without call or prepayment penalties.

Table 2223 presents a summary of the repricing schedule of our interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities (gap) as of ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2013.


	Interest Rate Sensitivity Period																							Interest Rate Sensitivity Period
	0-30 Days			31-90 Days			91-180 Days			181-365 Days			1-2 Years			2-5 Years			Over 5 Years			Total		0-30 Days			31-90 Days			91-180 Days			181-365 Days			1-2 Years			2-5 Years			Over 5 Years			Total
	(Dollars in thousands)																							(Dollars in thousands)
Earning assets
Interest-bearing deposits due from banks	$	206,753		$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—		$	206,753	$	97,576		$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—		$	97,576
Federal funds sold		2,850			—			—			—			—			—			—			2,850		2,475			—			—			—			—			—			—			2,475
Investment securities		50,413			70,643			51,549			96,508			93,918			136,685			225,213			724,929		52,989			70,366			46,596			77,252			91,848			146,159			250,836			736,406
Loans receivable		510,529			274,083			286,039			498,368			438,985			553,100			60,776			2,621,880		484,849			239,735			296,188			508,649			502,207			513,668			82,298			2,627,594

Total earning assets		770,545			344,726			337,588			594,876			532,903			689,785			285,989			3,556,412		637,889			310,101			342,784			585,901			594,055			660,187			333,134			3,464,051

Interest-bearing liabilities
Interest-bearing transaction and savings deposits		73,961			147,921			221,883			443,764			291,269			271,144			361,015			1,810,957		75,700			151,398			227,098			454,196			282,830			273,945			270,113			1,735,280
Time deposits		95,509			177,144			191,125			261,709			109,350			101,670			142			936,649		94,726			134,781			194,3355			237,826			98,533			96,327			33			856,581
Federal funds purchased		—			—			—			—			—			—			—			—		—			—			—			—			—			—			—			—
Securities sold under repurchase agreements		65,614			—			—			—			1,544			4,632			5,404			77,194		62,442			—			—			—			1,469			4,408			5,142			73,461
FHLB borrowed funds		105			12			30,019			135			279			44,361			55,458			130,369		15,006			15,012			117			137			283			44,261			55,435			130,251
Subordinated debentures		3,093			—			—			—			—			—			—			3,093		3,093			—			—			—			—			—			—			3,093

Total interest- bearing liabilities		238,282			325,077			443,027			705,608			402,442			421,807			422,019			2,958,262
Total interest-bearing liabilities																									250,967			301,191			421,570			692,159			383,115			418,941			330,723			2,798,666

Interest rate sensitivity gap	$	532,263		$	19,649		$	(105,439	)	$	(110,732	)	$	130,461		$	267,978		$	(136,030	)	$	598,150	$	386,922		$	8,910		$	(78,786	)	$	(106,258	)	$	210,940		$	241,246		$	2,411		$	665,385

Cumulative interest rate sensitivity gap	$	532,263		$	551,912		$	446,473		$	335,741		$	466,202		$	734,180		$	598,150				$	386,922		$	395,832		$	317,046		$	210,788		$	421,728		$	662,974		$	665,385
Cumulative rate sensitive assets to rate sensitive liabilities		323.4	%		198.0	%		144.4	%		119.6	%		122.0	%		128.9	%		120.2	%				254.2	%		171.7	%		132.6	%		112.7	%		120.6	%		126.9	%		123.8	%
Cumulative gap as a % of total earning assets		15.0	%		15.5	%		12.6	%		9.4	%		13.1	%		20.6	%		16.8	%				11.2	%		11.4	%		9.2	%		6.1	%		12.2	%		19.1	%		19.2	%

Based on their evaluation as of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that the disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) are effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in reports that we file or submit under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in Securities and Exchange Commission rules and forms. Additionally, our disclosure controls and procedures were also effective in ensuring that information required to be disclosed in our Exchange Act report is accumulated and communicated to our management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures.

There have not been any changes in the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting during the quarter ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2013, which have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

There are no material pending legal proceedings, other than ordinary routine litigation incidental to its business, to which Home BancShares, Inc. or its subsidiaries are a party or of which any of their property is the subject.

There were no material changes from the risk factors set forth in Part I, Item 1A, “Risk Factors,” of our Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012. See the discussion of our risk factors in the Form 10-K, as filed with the SEC. The risks described are not the only risks facing the Company. Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to us or that we currently deem to be immaterial also may materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and/or operating results.

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.


Arkansas		71-0682831
(State or other jurisdiction of		~~(I.R.S. Employer~~
incorporation or organization)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)


719 Harkrider, Suite 100, Conway, Arkansas		72032
(Address of principal executive offices)		(Zip Code)


			Page No.
Part I:	Financial Information
Item 1:	Financial Statements

~~Item 1. Financial Statements~~

Consolidated Balance Sheets — ~~March 31,~~ June 30, 2013 (Unaudited) and December 31, 2012		43

Consolidated Statements of Income (Unaudited) — Three and six months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2013 and 2012		4
	Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Unaudited) — Three and six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012			5

Consolidated Statements of ~~Comprehensive Income~~Stockholders’ Equity (Unaudited) — ~~Three~~ Six months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2013 and 2012		5
	Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited) – Six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012			6

~~Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity (Unaudited) —~~ ~~Three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012~~		6

~~Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited) —~~ ~~Three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012~~		7

Condensed Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)		~~8-39~~7-40

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm		4041
Item 2:
~~Item 2.~~ Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations		~~41-73~~42-78
Item 3:
~~Item 3.~~ Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk		~~73-75~~78-80
Item 4:
~~Item 4.~~ Controls and Procedures		7681

Part II:	Other Information
Item 1:
~~Item 1.~~ Legal Proceedings		7681
Item1A:
~~Item1A.~~ Risk Factors		7681
Item 2:
~~Item 2.~~ Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds		7681
Item 3:
~~Item 3.~~ Defaults Upon Senior Securities		7681
Item 4:
~~Item 4.~~ (Reserved)		7681
Item 5:
~~Item 5.~~ Other Information		7782
Item 6:
~~Item 6.~~ Exhibits		7782

Signatures		78		83


~~Exhibit List~~
12.1		Computation of Ratios of Earnings to Fixed Charges
15		Awareness of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
31.1		CEO Certification Pursuant to 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a)
31.2		CFO Certification Pursuant to 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a)
32.1		CEO Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
32.2		CFO Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
101		XBRL Documents


Options Outstanding							Options Exercisable
Exercise Prices	Options Outstanding Shares (000)		Weighted- Average Remaining Contractual Life (in years)		Weighted- Average Exercise Price		Options Exercisable Shares (000)		Weighted- Average Exercise Price
$ 6.17 to $7.01		19		1.62	$	6.42		19	$	6.42
$ 7.85 to $8.68		40		1.66		8.53		40		8.53
$ 9.55 to $9.83		48		2.17		9.62		48		9.62
$ 10.66 to $10.66		100		2.60		10.66		100		10.66
$ 11.09 to $11.09		101		2.95		11.09		101		11.09
$ 16.65 to $17.21		43		4.78		17.13		43		17.13
$ 18.50 to $18.62		9		4.27		18.59		9		18.59
$ 20.33 to $22.74		28		4.08		20.72		27		20.63
$ 26.25 to $26.25		44		8.81		26.25		8		26.25
$ 34.50 to $34.50		35		9.81		34.50		—		—

		467						395


		Level 1		Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities


		Level 2		Observable inputs other than Level 1 prices, such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities; quoted prices in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities


		Level 3		Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities


~~HOME BANCSHARES, INC.~~
~~(Registrant)~~

Date: ~~May~~August 7, 2013						/s/ C. Randall Sims
						C. Randall Sims, Chief Executive Officer

Date: ~~May~~August 7, 2013						/s/ Randy E. Mayor
						Randy E. Mayor, Chief Financial Officer

Large accelerated filer

Accelerated filer

Non-accelerated filer

Smaller reporting company