(Former name, former address and formal fiscal year, if changed since last report)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No x

The number of shares of the registrant’s Common Stock, $0.001 par value, outstanding as of ~~November 1, 2013~~April 28, 2014 was ~~14,258,492.~~16,105,958.


	September 30, 2013			December 31, 2012			March 31, 2014			December 31, 2013
ASSETS
Real estate, at cost	$	622,481		$	533,753		$	627,993		$	642,353
Less: accumulated depreciation		76,923			65,730			84,008			81,241

Total real estate, net		545,558			468,023			543,985			561,112

Lease intangibles, net		75,345			57,254			78,284			79,632
Real estate and related assets held for sale, net								9,932			—
Cash and cash equivalents		4,531			5,546			5,813			8,546
Restricted cash		6,406			2,935			3,506			5,051
Funds held in escrow		8,986			7,591			9,417			8,653
Deferred rent receivable, net		17,998			15,124			19,520			18,905
Deferred financing costs, net		6,643			6,569			6,814			6,840
Other assets		945			1,737			1,611			1,786

TOTAL ASSETS	$	666,412		$	564,779		$	678,882		$	690,525

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

LIABILITIES
Mortgage notes payable	$	409,762		$	359,185		$	426,847		$	422,602
Borrowings under line of credit		28,900			25,000			24,100			24,400
Series C mandatorily redeemable preferred stock, par value $0.001 per share; $25 per share liquidation preference; 1,700,000 shares authorized; and 1,540,000 shares issued and outstanding at September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively		38,500			38,500
Series C mandatorily redeemable preferred stock, par value $0.001 per share; $25 per share liquidation preference; 1,700,000 shares authorized; and 1,540,000 shares issued and outstanding at March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively								38,500			38,500
Deferred rent liability, net		6,117			5,379			5,862			6,015
Asset retirement obligation liability		3,851			3,755
Asset retirement obligation								3,704			3,884
Accounts payable and accrued expenses		3,552			4,715			2,186			2,359
Other liabilities related to assets held for sale								178			—
Due to Adviser and Administrator⁽¹⁾		999			1,175			1,160			1,360
Other liabilities		9,874			4,705			6,495			8,259

Total Liabilities	$	501,555		$	442,414		$	509,032		$	507,379

Commitments and contingencies⁽²⁾

STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Series A and B redeemable preferred stock, par value $0.001 per share; $25 per share liquidation preference; 2,300,000 shares authorized and 2,150,000 shares issued and outstanding at September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively	$	2		$	2
Senior common stock, par value $0.001 per share; 7,500,000 shares authorized and 338,571 and 179,511 shares issued and outstanding at September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively		—			—
Common stock, par value $0.001 per share, 38,500,000 shares authorized and 14,258,492 and 11,083,584 shares issued and outstanding at September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively		14			11
Series A and B redeemable preferred stock, par value $0.001 per share; $25 per share liquidation preference; 2,300,000 shares authorized and 2,150,000 shares issued and outstanding at March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively							$	2		$	2
Senior common stock, par value $0.001 per share; 7,500,000 shares authorized and 402,811 and 374,484 shares issued and outstanding at March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively								—			—
Common stock, par value $0.001 per share, 38,500,000 shares authorized and 16,081,365 and 15,662,414 shares issued and outstanding at March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively								16			16
Additional paid in capital		274,159			215,470			305,994			298,751
Notes receivable - employee		(375	)		(410	)		(375	)		(375	)
Distributions in excess of accumulated earnings		(108,943	)		(92,708	)		(135,787	)		(115,248	)

Total Stockholders’ Equity		164,857			122,365			169,850			183,146

TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY	$	666,412		$	564,779		$	678,882		$	690,525

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.


	For the three months ended September 30,						For the nine months ended September 30,						For the three months ended March 31,
	2013			2012			2013			2012			2014			2013
Operating revenues
Rental income	$	15,807		$	12,878		$	43,663		$	37,214
Rental revenue													$	16,585		$	13,666
Tenant recovery revenue		383			92			819			264			551			369

Total operating revenues		16,190			12,970			44,482			37,478			17,136			14,035

Operating expenses
Depreciation and amortization		6,253			4,276			16,374			12,172			6,720			4,901
Property operating expenses		864			345			2,164			1,031			1,330			737
Acquisitions related expense		163			117			622			805
Acquisition related expenses														110			185
Base management fee⁽¹⁾		559			355			1,363			1,120			625			353
Incentive fee⁽¹⁾		1,138			927			3,001			2,614			1,240			931
Administration fee⁽¹⁾		274			272			1,004			846			492			362
General and administrative		377			343			1,243			1,130			466			389
Impairment charge														13,958			—

Total operating expenses before credit to incentive fee		9,628			6,635			25,771			19,718			24,941			7,858

Credit to incentive fee⁽¹⁾		(989	)		(535	)		(2,491	)		(1,794	)		(1,205	)		(585	)

Total operating expenses		8,639			6,100			23,280			17,924			23,736			7,273

Other income (expense)
Interest expense		(6,573	)		(5,229	)		(17,998	)		(14,687	)		(6,275	)		(5,661	)
Distributions attributable to Series C mandatorily redeemable preferred stock		(686	)		(686	)		(2,057	)		(1,829	)		(686	)		(686	)
Other income		17			37			47			109			47			18

Total other expense		(7,242	)		(5,878	)		(20,008	)		(16,407	)		(6,914	)		(6,329	)

Net income		309			992			1,194			3,147
Net (loss) income														(13,514	)		433

Distributions attributable to Series A and B preferred stock		(1,023	)		(1,023	)		(3,070	)		(3,070	)		(1,023	)		(1,023	)
Distributions attributable to senior common stock		(83	)		(30	)		(204	)		(71	)		(100	)		(53	)

Net (loss) income available to common stockholders	$	(797	)	$	(61	)	$	(2,080	)	$	6
Net loss attributable to common stockholders													$	(14,637	)	$	(643	)

Earnings per weighted average share of common stock - basic & diluted													$	(0.93	)	$	(0.06	)
(Loss) income from continuing operations (net of dividends attributable to preferred stock)	$	(0.06	)	$	(0.01	)	$	(0.16	)	$	0.00

Net (loss) income available to common stockholders	$	(0.06	)	$	(0.01	)	$	(0.16	)	$	0.00

Dividends declared per share of common stock	$	0.375		$	0.375		$	1.125		$	1.125

Weighted average shares of common stock outstanding
Basic		14,196,423			10,945,379			12,613,354			10,945,379

Diluted		14,196,423			10,945,379			12,613,354			11,022,682
Weighted average shares of common stock outstanding - basic & diluted														15,746,714			11,230,647

Earnings per weighted average share of senior common stock	$	0.26		$	0.26		$	0.78		$	0.80		$	0.26		$	0.26

Weighted average shares of senior common stock outstanding - basic		313,239			112,873			260,693			89,720			385,875			204,582

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.


	For the nine months ended September 30,						For the three months ended March 31,
	2013			2012			2014			2013
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income	$	1,194		$	3,147
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Net (loss) income							$	(13,514	)	$	433
Adjustments to reconcile net (loss) income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization		16,374			12,172			6,720			4,901
Impairment charge								13,958			—
Amortization of deferred financing costs		1,410			1,103			386			405
Amortization of deferred rent asset and liability, net		(243	)		(533	)		(92	)		(98	)
Amortization of discount and premium on assumed debt		(128	)		45			(44	)		(42	)
Asset retirement obligation expense		96			124			(180	)		31
Increase (decrease) in other assets		242			(261	)		298			(465	)
Increase in deferred rent liability		—			2,510
Increase in deferred rent receivable		(2,724	)		(1,189	)		(906	)		(826	)
(Decrease) increase in accounts payable, accrued expenses, and amount due Adviser and Administrator		(1,339	)		2,810
Decrease in accounts payable, accrued expenses, and amount due Adviser and Administrator								(372	)		(637	)
Decrease in other liabilities		1,698			240			(41	)		(264	)
Leasing commissions paid		(1,008	)		(1,538	)		(54	)		(384	)

Net cash provided by operating activities		15,572			18,630			6,159			3,054

Cash flows from investing activities:
Acquisition of real estate and related intangible assets		(104,806	)		(47,307	)		(3,718	)		(5,650	)
Improvements of existing real estate		(5,355	)		(5,526	)		(1,673	)		(121	)
Receipts from lenders for funds held in escrow		5,764			1,286			496			1,228
Payments to lenders for funds held in escrow		(7,159	)		(3,406	)		(1,260	)		(830	)
Receipts from tenants for reserves		5,657			2,156			790			1,456
Payments to tenants from reserves		(2,167	)		(1,647	)		(2,335	)		(541	)
Increase in restricted cash		(3,472	)		(642	)
Decrease (increase) in restricted cash								1,545			(915	)
Deposits on future acquisitions		(2,125	)		(1,625	)		(250	)		—
Deposits applied against real estate investments		2,675			1,125			127			50

Net cash used in investing activities		(110,988	)		(55,586	)		(6,278	)		(5,323	)

Cash flows from financing activities:
Proceeds from issuance of equity		62,139			1,103			7,707			6,484
Offering costs		(3,533	)		(125	)		(503	)		(398	)
Proceeds from issuance of mandatorily redeemable preferred stock		—			38,500
Borrowings under mortgage notes payable		56,108			46,455			—			3,700
Payments for deferred financing costs		(1,484	)		(3,483	)		(360	)		(141	)
Principal repayments on mortgage notes payable		(5,403	)		(5,544	)		(2,172	)		(1,808	)
Principal repayments on employee notes receivable		35			12			—			35
Borrowings from line of credit		58,900			19,300			12,700			7,900
Repayments on line of credit		(55,000	)		(32,500	)		(13,000	)		(6,500	)
(Decrease) increase in security deposits		(18	)		134
Distributions paid for common, senior common and preferred stock		(17,343	)		(15,443	)		(6,986	)		(5,270	)

Net cash provided by financing activities		94,401			48,409
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities								(2,614	)		4,002

Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents		(1,015	)		11,453			(2,733	)		1,733

Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period		5,546			3,329			8,546			5,546

Cash and cash equivalents, end of period							$	5,813		$	7,279

Cash and cash equivalents, end of period	$	4,531		$	14,782
NON-CASH OPERATING, INVESTING AND FINANCING INFORMATION

Fixed rate debt assumed in connection with acquisitions	$	—		$	10,758		$	6,330		$	—

Senior common dividend issued in the dividend reinvestment program	$	85		$	11		$	39		$	22

Capital improvements included in accounts payable							$	671		$	—

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

Gladstone Commercial Corporation, is a real estate investment trust, or REIT, that was incorporated under the General Corporation Laws of the State of Maryland on February 14, 2003 primarily for the purpose of investing in and owning net leased industrial, commercial and retail real property and selectively making long-term industrial and commercial mortgage loans. Subject to certain restrictions and limitations, our business is managed by Gladstone Management Corporation, a Delaware corporation, or the ~~Adviser. We~~Adviser, and administrative services are ~~externally managed pursuant to contractual arrangements with our Adviser and~~provided by Gladstone Administration, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, or the Administrator, ~~which~~each pursuant to a contractual arrangement with us. Our Adviser and Administrator collectively employ all of our personnel and pay their salaries, benefits, and general expenses directly.

We conduct substantially all of our operations through a subsidiary, Gladstone Commercial Limited Partnership, a Delaware limited partnership, or the Operating Partnership. As we currently own all of the general and limited partnership interests of the Operating Partnership through two of our subsidiaries, GCLP Business Trust I and II, the financial position and results of operations of the Operating Partnership are consolidated with those of the Company.

Gladstone Commercial Lending, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, or Gladstone Commercial Lending, a subsidiary of ours, was created to conduct all operations related to real estate mortgage loans of the Company. As the Operating Partnership currently owns all of the membership interests of Gladstone Commercial Lending, the financial position and results of operations of Gladstone Commercial Lending are consolidated with those of the Company.

Gladstone Commercial Advisers, Inc., a Delaware corporation, or Commercial Advisers, and a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, is a taxable REIT subsidiary, or TRS, which was created to collect any non-qualifying income related to our real estate portfolio. There has been no such income earned to date. Since the Company owns 100% of the voting securities of Commercial Advisers, the financial position and results of operations of Commercial Advisers are consolidated with those of the Company.

GCLP Business Trust I and GCLP Business Trust II, each a subsidiary and business trust of the Company, were formed under the laws of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts on December 28, 2005. We transferred our 99% limited partnership interest in the Operating Partnership to GCLP Business Trust I in exchange for 100 shares of the trust. Gladstone Commercial Partners, LLC transferred its 1% general partnership interest in the Operating Partnership to GCLP Business Trust II in exchange for 100 trust shares.

All further references herein to “we,” “our,” “us” and the “Company” mean Gladstone Commercial Corporation and its consolidated subsidiaries, except where it is made clear that the term means only Gladstone Commercial Corporation.

Our interim financial statements are prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, or GAAP, for interim financial information and pursuant to the requirements for reporting on Form 10-Q and in accordance with Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, certain disclosures accompanying annual financial statements prepared in accordance with GAAP are omitted. The year-end balance sheet data presented herein was derived from audited financial

statements, but does not include all disclosures required by GAAP. In the opinion of our management, all adjustments, consisting solely of normal recurring accruals, necessary for the fair ~~statement~~presentation of financial statements for the interim period have been included. The interim financial statements and notes thereto should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and notes thereto included in our Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, ~~2012,~~2013, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February ~~19, 2013.~~18, 2014. The results of operations for the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30, 2013~~March 31, 2014 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for other interim periods or for the full fiscal year.

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. Actual results could materially differ from those estimates.

Certain line items on the condensed consolidated statements of operations and condensed consolidated statements of cash flows from prior year’s financial statements have been reclassified to conform to the current year presentation. These reclassifications had no effect on previously reported net income.

We record investments in real estate at cost and capitalize improvements and replacements when they extend the useful life or improve the efficiency of the asset. We expense costs of repairs and maintenance as such costs are incurred. We compute depreciation using the straight-line method over the estimated useful life or 39 years for buildings and improvements, 5 to 720 years for equipment and fixtures, and the shorter of the useful life or the remaining lease term for tenant improvements and leasehold interests.

Certain of our acquisitions involve sale-leaseback transactions with newly-originated leases, which we account for as asset acquisitions under Accounting Standards Codification, or ASC, 805, “Business Combinations.” In the case of an asset acquisition, we will capitalize the transaction costs incurred in connection with the acquisition. Other of our acquisitions involve the acquisition of properties that are already being operated as rental property, which we will generally consider to be a business combination under ASC 805. Business combination guidance is generally applicable to us when properties are acquired with leases in place at the time of acquisition. When an acquisition is considered a business combination, ASC 805 requires that the purchase price of real estate be allocated to the acquired tangible assets and liabilities, consisting of land, building, tenant improvements, long-term debt assumed and identified intangible assets and liabilities, typically the value of above-market and below-market leases, the value of in-place leases, the value of unamortized lease origination costs and the value of tenant relationships, based in each case on their fair values. ASC 805 also requires that all expenses related to ~~the~~an acquisition accounted for as a business combination to be expensed as incurred, rather than capitalized into the cost of the acquisition.

Management’s estimates of fair value are made using methods similar to those used by independent appraisers (e.g. discounted cash flow analysis). Factors considered by management in its analysis include an estimate of carrying costs during hypothetical expected lease-up periods considering current market conditions and costs to execute similar leases. We also consider information obtained about each property as a result of our pre-acquisition due diligence, marketing and leasing activities in estimating the fair value of the tangible and intangible assets and liabilities acquired. In estimating carrying costs, management also includes real estate taxes, insurance and other operating expenses and estimates of lost rentals at market rates during the hypothetical expected lease-up periods, which primarily range from 9 to 18 months, depending on specific local market conditions. Management also estimates costs to execute similar leases, including leasing commissions, legal and other related expenses to the extent that such costs are not already incurred in connection with a new lease origination as part of the transaction.

We allocate purchase price to the fair value of the tangible assets of an acquired property by valuing the property as if it were vacant. The “as-if-vacant” value is allocated to land, building and tenant improvements based on management’s determination of the relative fair values of these assets. Real estate depreciation expense on these tangible assets was ~~$4.2~~$4.4 million and ~~$11.2~~$3.4 million for the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively ~~and $3.0 million and $8.7 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012, respectively.~~

Above-market and below-market in-place lease fair values for owned properties are recorded based on the present value (using an interest rate which reflects the risks associated with the leases acquired) of the difference between (i) the contractual amounts to be paid pursuant to the in-place leases and (ii) management’s estimate of fair market lease rates for the corresponding in-place leases, measured over a period equal to the remaining non-cancelable term of the lease. When determining the non-cancelable term of the lease, we evaluate if fixed-rate renewal options, if any, should be included. The capitalized above-market lease values, included in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets as part of deferred rent receivable, are amortized as a reduction of rental income over the remaining non-cancelable terms of the respective leases. Total amortization related to above-market lease values was $0.1 million, ~~and $0.2 million~~ for both the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2014 and 2013, ~~respectively, and $0.1 million and $0.3 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012,~~ respectively. The capitalized below-market lease values, included in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets as part of deferred rent liability, are amortized as an increase to rental income over the remaining non-cancelable terms of the respective ~~leases.~~leases including any below market renewal periods. Total amortization related to below-market lease values was $0.2 million ~~and $0.4 million~~ for both the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2014 and 2013, ~~respectively, and $0.3 million and $0.8 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012,~~ respectively.

The total amount of the remaining intangible assets acquired, which consists of in-place lease values, unamortized lease origination costs, and customer relationship intangible values, are allocated based on management’s evaluation of the specific characteristics of each tenant’s lease and our overall relationship with that respective tenant. Characteristics to be considered by management in determining these values include the nature and extent of our existing business relationships with the tenant, growth prospects for developing new business with the tenant, the tenant’s credit quality and our expectations of lease renewals (including those existing under the terms of the lease agreement), among other factors.

The value of in-place leases and lease origination costs are amortized to expense over the remaining term of the respective leases, which generally range from 10 to 15 years. The value of customer relationship intangibles, which is the benefit to us resulting from the likelihood of an existing tenant renewing its lease, are amortized to expense over the remaining term and any anticipated renewal periods in the respective leases, but in no event does the amortization period for intangible assets exceed the remaining depreciable life of the building. Should a tenant terminate its lease, the unamortized portion of the above-market and below-market lease values would be charged to rental income and the unamortized portion of in-place lease values, lease origination costs and customer relationship intangibles will be immediately charged to ~~the related income or~~amortization expense. Total amortization expense related to these intangible assets and liabilities was ~~$2.0~~$2.3 million and ~~$5.2~~$1.5 million for the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2014 and 2013, ~~respectively, and $1.2 million and $3.5 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012,~~ respectively.

ASC 360-10, “Property, Plant, and Equipment,” requires that any properties which have are held for sale, be presented separately in the condensed consolidated balance sheet. Real estate assets held for sale are measured at the lower of the carrying amount or the fair value, less the cost to sell, and are listed separately on our condensed consolidated balance sheet. Once properties are classified as held for sale, no further depreciation is recorded.

We account for the impairment of real estate, including intangible assets, in accordance with ASC 360-10-35, “Property, Plant, and Equipment,” which requires us to periodically review the carrying value of each property to determine if circumstances indicate impairment of the carrying value of the investment exists or that depreciation periods should be modified. If circumstances indicate the possibility of impairment, we prepare a projection of the undiscounted future cash flows, without interest charges, of the specific property and determine if the carrying value of the investment in such property is recoverable. In performing the analysis, we consider such factors as the tenants’ payment history and financial condition, the likelihood of lease renewal, business conditions in the industry in which the tenants operate, ~~and~~ whether there are indications that the fair value of the real estate has ~~decreased.~~decreased and our intended holding period of the property. If the carrying amount is more than the aggregate undiscounted future cash flows, we would recognize an impairment loss to the extent the carrying amount exceeds the estimated fair value, less cost to sell, of the property.

We evaluate our entire portfolio of properties each quarter for any impairment indicators and perform an impairment analysis on those select properties that have an indication of impairment. We performed this evaluation and analysis and concluded that none of our properties were impaired as of September 30, 2013; however, we determined that our property located in South Hadley, Massachusetts may become impaired in the future. We recently extended the lease on this property for one year, and it now expires in January 2015. There may be a possibility we would have to impair the property in 2014 if we do not negotiate another lease extension on this building or find a replacement tenant

~~We will continue to monitor our portfolio for any other indicators of impairment. There have been no impairments recognized on our real estate assets since inception.~~

Deferred financing costs consist of costs incurred to obtain financing, including legal fees, origination fees and administrative fees. The costs are deferred and amortized using the straight-line method, which approximates the effective interest method, over the term of the secured financing. We made payments of ~~$1.3~~$0.4 million and ~~$1.5~~$0.1 million for deferred financing costs during the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2014 and 2013, ~~respectively, and payments of $0.5 million and $3.5 million during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012,~~ respectively. The decrease in payments incurred during the nine months ended September 30, 2013 was primarily related to the issuance of our 7.125% Series C Cumulative Term Preferred Stock in January 2012, or the Term Preferred Stock, discussed in further detail in Note 6 “Mandatorily Redeemable Preferred Stock.” Total amortization expense related to deferred financing costs is included in interest expense and was ~~$0.6 million and $1.4~~$0.4 million for both the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2014 and 2013, ~~respectively, and $0.4 million and $1.1 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012,~~ respectively.

Rental revenue includes rents that each tenant pays in accordance with the terms of its respective lease reported evenly over the non-cancelable term of the lease. Most of our leases contain rental increases at specified intervals. We recognize such revenues on a straight-line basis. Deferred rent receivable in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet includes the cumulative difference between rental revenue, as recorded on a straight-line basis, and rents received from the tenants in accordance with the lease terms, along with the capitalized above-market in-place lease values of certain acquired properties. Accordingly, we determine, in our judgment, to what extent the deferred rent receivable applicable to each specific tenant is collectable. We review deferred rent receivable, as it relates to straight line rents, on a quarterly basis and take into consideration the tenant’s payment history, the financial condition of the tenant, business conditions in the industry in which the tenant operates and economic conditions in the geographic area in which the property is located. In the event that the collectability of deferred rent with respect to any given tenant is in doubt, we record an allowance for uncollectable accounts or record a direct write-off of the specific rent receivable. No such reserves or direct write-offs have been recorded to date.

Tenant recovery revenue includes payments from tenants as reimbursements for franchise taxes, management fees, insurance, and ground lease payments. We recognize tenant recovery revenue in the same periods that we incur the related expenses.

ASC 410, “Asset Retirement and Environmental Obligation,” requires an entity to recognize a liability for a conditional asset retirement obligation when incurred if the liability can be reasonably estimated. ASC 410-20-20 clarifies that the term “Conditional Asset Retirement Obligation” refers to a legal obligation (pursuant to existing laws or by contract) to perform an asset retirement activity in which the timing and/or method of settlement are conditional on a future event that may or may not be within the control of the entity. ASC 410-20-25-6 clarifies when an entity would have sufficient information to reasonably estimate the fair value of an asset retirement obligation. We have accrued a liability and corresponding increase to the cost of the related properties for disposal related to all properties constructed prior to 1985 that have, or

may have, asbestos present in the building. The liabilities are accreted over the life of the leases for the respective properties. There were no liabilities accrued during the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September 30, 2013. There were $0.3 million in liabilities accrued in connection with acquisitions for the nine months ended September 30, 2012.~~March 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively. We recorded expenses of $0.03 million ~~and $0.1 million~~ during both the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively, to general and ~~recorded expenses of $0.04 million and $0.12 million during the three and nine months ended September 30 2012, respectively.~~administrative expense. Costs of future expenditures for obligations are discounted to their present value. The aggregate undiscounted obligation on all properties is $9.2 million and the discount rates used in the calculations range from 2.5% to 7.6%. We do not expect to make any payments in conjunction with these obligations in each of the next five years.

For the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2014 and 2013, ~~and 2012,~~ comprehensive income (loss) equaled net ~~income;~~income (loss); therefore, a separate statement of comprehensive income (loss) is not included in the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements.

The Financial Accounting Standards Board, or FASB, issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-08, “Presentation of Financial Statements (Topic 205) and Property, Plant, and Equipment (Topic 360): Reporting Discontinued Operations and Disclosures of Disposals of Components of an Entity.” Under this revised guidance, only disposals representing a strategic shift in operations, such as a disposal of a major geographic area, a major line of business or a major equity method investment, will be presented as discontinued operations. This standard is effective for our fiscal year beginning January 1, 2015; however, the FASB has permitted early adoption beginning with the first quarter of 2014. We adopted this standard during the quarter ended March 31, 2014, and accordingly we did not present our assets classified as held for sale during the quarter ended March 31, 2014 as discontinued operations.

We are externally managed pursuant to contractual arrangements with our Adviser and our Administrator which collectively employ all of our personnel and pay their salaries, benefits, and general expenses directly. We have an advisory agreement with our Adviser, or the Advisory Agreement, and an administration agreement with our Administrator, or the Administration Agreement. The management and administrative services and fees under the Advisory and Administration Agreements are described below. ~~As of September 30, 2013~~At March 31, 2014 and December 31, ~~2012, $1.0~~2013, $1.2 million and ~~$1.2~~$1.4 million, respectively, was collectively due to our Adviser and Administrator.

The Advisory Agreement provides for an annual base management fee equal to 2% of our total stockholders’ equity, less the recorded value of any preferred stock and adjusted to exclude the effect of any unrealized gains, losses or other items that do not affect realized net income (including impairment charges), or common stockholders’ equity, and an incentive fee based on funds from operations, or FFO. For the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2014 and 2013, we recorded a base management fee of $0.6 million and ~~$1.4 million, respectively, and for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012, we recorded a base management fee of~~ $0.4 ~~million and $1.1~~ million, respectively.

For purposes of calculating the incentive fee, FFO includes any realized capital gains and capital losses, less any distributions paid on preferred stock and senior common stock, but FFO does not include any unrealized capital gains or ~~losses.~~losses (including impairment charges). The incentive fee rewards the Adviser if our quarterly FFO, before giving effect to any incentive fee, or pre-incentive fee FFO, exceeds 1.75%, or 7% annualized, or the hurdle rate, of total common stockholders’ equity. The Adviser receives 100% of the amount of the pre-incentive fee FFO that exceeds the hurdle rate, but is less than 2.1875% of our common stockholders’ equity. The Adviser also receives an incentive fee of 20% of the amount of our pre-incentive fee FFO that exceeds 2.1875% of common stockholders’ equity.

For the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2014 and 2013, we recorded an incentive fee of ~~$1.1~~$1.2 million and ~~$3.0~~$0.9 million, respectively, offset by credits related to unconditional, voluntary and irrevocable waivers issued by the Adviser of ~~$1.0~~$1.2 million and ~~$2.5~~$0.6 million, respectively, resulting in a net incentive fee for the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2014 and 2013, of ~~$0.1 million~~$40,000 and $0.5 million, respectively. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012, we recorded an incentive fee of $0.9 million and $2.6 million, respectively, offset by credits related to unconditional, voluntary and irrevocable waivers issued by the Adviser of $0.5 million and $1.8 million, respectively, resulting in a net incentive fee for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012, of $0.4 million and $0.8$0.3 million, respectively. Our Board of Directors accepted the Adviser’s offer to waive, on a quarterly basis, a portion of the incentive fee for the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2014 and 2013, ~~and 2012,~~ in order to support the current level of distributions to all classes of our stockholders. This waiver may not be recouped by the Adviser in the future.

Pursuant to the Administration Agreement, we pay for our allocable portion of the Administrator’s overhead expenses in performing its obligations to us, including, but not limited to, rent and the salaries and benefits of its personnel, including our chief financial officer and treasurer, chief compliance officer, internal counsel and secretary and their respective staffs. Our allocable portion of expenses is derived by multiplying the Administrator’s total allocable expenses by the percentage of our total assets at the beginning of each quarter in comparison to the total assets of all companies managed by the Adviser under similar agreements. For the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2014 and 2013, we recorded an administration fee of ~~$0.3~~$0.5 million and ~~$1.0 million, respectively, and for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012, we recorded an administration fee of $0.3 million and $0.8~~$0.4 million, respectively.

Gladstone Securities, LLC, or Gladstone Securities, is a privately held broker dealer registered with The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority and insured by the Securities Investor Protection Corporation. Gladstone Securities is an affiliate of ours, as its parent company is controlled by Mr. David Gladstone, our chairman and chief executive officer. Mr. Gladstone also serves on the board of managers of Gladstone Securities.

In connection with the offering of our senior common stock (see Note 8,9, “Stockholders’ Equity,” for further details) we entered into a Dealer Manager Agreement, dated March 25, 2011, or the Dealer Manager Agreement, with Gladstone Securities pursuant to which Gladstone Securities agreed to act as our exclusive dealer manager in connection with the offering. Pursuant to the terms of the Dealer Manager Agreement, Gladstone Securities is entitled to receive a sales commission in the amount of 7.0% of the gross proceeds of the shares of senior common stock sold, plus a dealer manager fee in the amount of 3.0% of the gross proceeds of the shares of senior common stock sold. Gladstone Securities, in its sole and absolute discretion, may re-allocate all of its selling commissions attributable to a participating broker-dealer and may also re-allocate a portion of its dealer manager fee earned in respect of the proceeds generated by the participating broker-dealer to any participating broker-dealer as a non-accountable marketing allowance. In addition, we have agreed to indemnify Gladstone Securities against various liabilities, including certain liabilities arising under the federal securities laws. We made approximately ~~$0.05 million~~$40,000 and ~~$0.2 million~~$60,000 of payments during the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2014 and 2013 ~~respectively, and we made approximately $0.06 million and $0.1 million of payments during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012,~~ respectively, to Gladstone Securities pursuant to this agreement, which are reflected as a component of senior common stock costs in the statement of stockholders’ equity. The Dealer Manager Agreement currently is scheduled to terminate on the earlier of (i) March 28, 2015 or (ii) the date on which 3,000,000 shares of ~~Senior Common Stock~~senior common stock are sold pursuant to the Dealer Manager Agreement.

We also entered into an agreement with Gladstone Securities, effective June 18, 2013, for it to act as our non-exclusive agent to assist us with arranging mortgage financing for properties we own. In connection with this engagement, Gladstone Securities may from time to time solicit the interest of various commercial real estate lenders or recommend to us third party lenders offering credit products or packages that are responsive to our needs. We will pay Gladstone Securities a financing fee in connection with the services it provides to us for securing mortgage financing on any of our properties. The amount of these financing fees which are payable upon closing of the financing, will be based on a percentage of the amount of the mortgage, generally ranging from 0.5% to a maximum of 1.0% of the mortgage obtained. The amount of the financing fees may be reduced or eliminated, as determined by us and Gladstone Securities, after taking into consideration various factors, including, but not limited to, the involvement of any third party brokers and market conditions. We ~~paid~~did not pay any financing fees to Gladstone Securities ~~of $0.04 million~~ during ~~both~~ the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30, 2013 on total mortgages secured of $52.4 million,~~March 31, 2014 or ~~0.08%.~~2013. The agreement is scheduled to terminate on August 31, 2014, unless renewed or earlier terminated pursuant to the provisions contained therein.

The following tables set forth the computation of basic and diluted ~~earnings (loss)~~loss per share of common stock for the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2014 and 2013, ~~and 2012.~~respectively. We computed basic ~~earnings (loss)~~loss per share for the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2014 and 2013, ~~and 2012~~respectively, using the weighted average number of shares outstanding during the periods. Diluted ~~earnings~~loss per share for the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2014 and 2013, ~~and 2012, reflects~~would have reflected additional shares of common stock, related to our convertible senior common stock, that would have been outstanding if dilutive potential shares of common stock had been issued, as well as

an adjustment to net income available to common stockholders as applicable to common stockholders that would result from their assumed ~~issuance~~issuance; however, the convertible senior common stock was excluded from the calculation of diluted loss per share for the three months ended March 31, 2014, and 2013 respectively, because it was anti-dilutive (dollars in thousands, except share or per share amounts).

The following table sets forth the components of our investments in real estate as of ~~September 30, 2013~~March 31, 2014 and December 31, ~~2012 (in~~2013 (dollars in thousands):


	September 30, 2013			December 31, 2012			March 31, 2014 ⁽¹⁾			December 31, 2013
Real estate:
Land	$	77,299		$	69,126		$	77,062		$	79,153
Building and improvements		511,335			442,451			514,719			527,230
Tenant improvements		33,847			22,176			36,212			35,970
Accumulated depreciation		(76,923	)		(65,730	)		(84,008	)		(81,241	)

Real estate, net	$	545,558		$	468,023		$	543,985		$	561,112

During the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September 30, 2013,~~March 31, 2014, we acquired ~~five~~two properties, ~~and completed an expansion of one property,~~ which are summarized in the table below (dollars in thousands):

In accordance with ASC 805, we determined the fair value of the acquired assets related to the ~~five~~two properties acquired during the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September 30, 2013~~March 31, 2014 as follows (in thousands):

Below is a summary of the total revenue and earnings recognized on the ~~five~~two properties acquired during the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2014 (dollars in thousands):

The following table reflects pro-forma consolidated statements of operations as if the two properties acquired during the three months ended March 31, 2014 were acquired as of the beginning of the previous period. The pro-forma earnings for the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013 were adjusted to assume that acquisition-related costs were incurred as of the beginning of the previous period (dollars in thousands, except per share amounts):

During the three months ended March 31, 2013, we acquired one property, which is summarized below (dollars in thousands):

In accordance with ASC 805, we determined the fair value of acquired assets related to the one property acquired during the three months ended March 31, 2013 as follows (in thousands):

Below is a summary of the total revenue and earnings recognized on the one property acquired during the three months ended March 31, 2013 (dollars in thousands):

We acquired five properties during the nine months ended September 30, 2013. The following table reflects pro-forma condensed consolidated statements of operations as if the properties were acquired as of the beginning of the previous period. The pro-forma earnings for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013, were adjusted to exclude $0.2 million and $0.6 million, respectively, of acquisition-related costs incurred during 2013 (dollars in thousands, except per share data):

~~During the nine months ended September 30, 2012, we acquired six properties, which are summarized below (dollars in thousands):~~

~~In accordance with ASC 805, we determined the fair value of acquired assets related to the six properties acquired during the nine months ended September 30, 2012 as follows (in thousands):~~

~~Below is a summary of the total revenue and earnings recognized on the six properties acquired during the nine months ended September 30, 2012 (dollars in thousands):~~

~~The weighted average amortization periods in years for the intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed during the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively, were as follows:~~

Future operating lease payments from tenants under non-cancelable leases, excluding tenant reimbursement of expenses, for the remainder of ~~2013~~2014 and each of the five succeeding fiscal years and thereafter is as follows ~~(in~~(dollars in thousands):


Year	Tenant Lease Payments		Tenant Lease Payments⁽¹⁾
Three Months ending December 31, 2013	$	14,727
2014		59,940
Nine Months ending December 31, 2014			$	46,572
2015		59,267		59,564
2016		56,272		55,853
2017		54,641		55,356
2018		52,850		53,551
2019				53,776
Thereafter		279,421		240,010

In accordance with the lease terms, substantially all operating expenses are required to be paid by the tenant; however, we would be required to pay property taxes on the respective properties in the event the tenants fail to pay them. The total annual property taxes for all properties owned by us as of ~~September 30, 2013,~~March 31, 2014, were ~~$10.2~~$11.0 million.

On January 14, 2013, we extended the lease with the tenant occupying our property located in Champaign, Illinois. The lease covering this property was extended for an additional 11 years through December 2024. The lease was originally set to expire in December 2013. The lease provides for prescribed rent escalations over the life of the lease, with annualized straight line rents of approximately $1.4 million. In connection with the extension of the lease and the modification of certain terms under the lease, we paid $0.4 million in leasing commissions.

On April 10, 2013, we extended the lease with the tenant occupying our property located in Akron, Ohio. The lease covering this property was extended for an additional 10 years, through January 2024. The lease was originally set to expire in January 2014. The lease provides for prescribed rent escalations over the life of the lease, with annualized straight line rents of approximately $0.3 million. In connection with the extension of the lease and the modification of certain terms under the lease, we provided a tenant allowance of $0.5 million.

On April 11, 2013, we funded a $3.3 million 102,400 square foot recently completed expansion of our property located in Clintonville, Wisconsin. In connection with the expansion of the property, we executed a lease amendment to extend the lease for an additional eight years, through October 2028. The lease was originally set to expire in October 2020. The lease was also amended to provide for an increase to the rental income over the life of the lease, with annualized straight line rents of approximately $1.0 million, up from $0.6 million under the original lease.

On May 14, 2013, our tenant occupying our Dayton, Ohio property notified us of their intention to exercise their early termination option. The lease requires the tenant to continue to pay monthly rent through the effective termination date of June 30, 2015.

On July 17, 2013, we executed a revised lease with a tenant to occupy our previously vacant property located in Hazelwood, Missouri. The lease commenced on August 1, 2013 and expires in May 2023. The tenant has two options to purchase the property: one option in March 2017 and the other option in May 2023. The lease provides for prescribed rent escalations over the life of the lease, with annualized straight line rents of approximately $0.2 million. In connection with the extension of the lease and the modification of certain terms under the lease, we paid $0.1 million in leasing commissions and $0.3 million in tenant improvements.

On August 7, 2013, we extended the lease with the tenant occupying our property located in South Hadley, Massachusetts. The lease covering this property was extended for an additional year through January 2015. The lease was originally set to expire in January 2014. The lease provides a scheduled rent increase over the previous lease, with annualized straight line rents of approximately $0.3 million. In connection with the extension of the lease and the modification of certain terms under the lease, we paid $3,400 in leasing commissions.

On August 15, 2013, we extended the lease with the tenant occupying our property located in Lexington, North Carolina. The lease covering this property was extended for an additional 12 years through April 2026. The lease was originally set to expire in April 2014. The lease provides for prescribed rent escalations over the life of the lease, with annualized straight line rents of approximately $0.4 million. In connection with the extension of the lease and the modification of certain terms under the lease, we provided a tenant allowance of $0.05 million, and we paid $0.2 million in leasing commissions

On August 15, 2013, we extended the lease with the tenant occupying our property located in Crenshaw, Pennsylvania. The lease covering this property was extended for an additional 12 years through April 2026. The lease was originally set to expire in April 2014. The lease provides for prescribed rent escalations over the life of the lease, with annualized straight line rents of approximately $0.7 million. In connection with the extension of the lease and the modification of certain terms under the lease, we provided a tenant allowance of $0.08 million, and we paid $0.4 million in leasing commissions.

The following table summarizes the carrying value of intangible assets and the accumulated amortization for each intangible asset class ~~(in~~(dollars in thousands):


	September 30, 2013					December 31, 2012					March 31, 2014					December 31, 2013
	Lease Intangibles		Accumulated Amortization			Lease Intangibles		Accumulated Amortization			Lease Intangibles ⁽¹⁾		Accumulated Amortization ⁽¹⁾			Lease Intangibles		Accumulated Amortization
In-place leases	$	44,743	$	(14,237	)	$	34,085	$	(12,125	)	$	48,418	$	(16,166	)	$	47,442	$	(15,158	)
Leasing costs		29,692		(8,694	)		24,071		(7,103	)		31,529		(10,005	)		31,339		(9,323	)
Customer relationships		33,664		(9,823	)		26,671		(8,345	)		35,529		(11,021	)		35,739		(10,407	)

	$	108,099	$	(32,754	)	$	84,827	$	(27,573	)	$	115,476	$	(37,192	)	$	114,520	$	(34,888	)

The weighted average amortization periods in years for the intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed during the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively, were as follows

The estimated aggregate amortization expense for the remainder of ~~2013~~2014 and for each of the five succeeding fiscal years and thereafter is as follows ~~(in~~(dollars in thousands):


Year	Estimated Amortization Expense		Estimated Amortization Expense
Three Months ending December 31, 2013	$	2,456
2014		9,643
Nine Months ending December 31, 2014			$	7,880
2015		9,077		9,892
2016		8,278		8,995
2017		8,078		8,811
2018		7,510		8,523
2019				8,515
Thereafter		30,303		25,668

As of March 31, 2014, we classified our property located in Sterling Heights, Michigan as held for sale under the provisions of ASC 360-10, which requires that the assets and liabilities of any properties which are held for sale, be presented separately in our condensed consolidated balance sheet in the current period presented. We received an unsolicited offer from a buyer for this property and the tenant in this building had a right of first refusal. The tenant exercised their right to purchase the building and we are currently negotiating a purchase and sale agreement for this property and we anticipate the sale to close during the second quarter of 2014. In accordance with ASC 360-10, the agreed upon purchase price with the current tenant is in excess of the carrying value of the property as of March 31, 2104, and thus the property was measured at its carrying value in our condensed consolidated balance sheet as of March 31, 2014.

The table below summarizes the components of income from real estate and related assets held for sale:

5.The table below summarizes the components of the assets and liabilities held for sale reflected on the accompanying consolidated balance sheet:

We performed the evaluation and analysis of our portfolio and concluded that our Roseville, Minnesota property was impaired as of March 31, 2014. We determined that the expected undiscounted cash flows based upon a revised estimated holding period of this property was below the current carrying value. The estimated holding period was revised after a potential tenant that we were anticipating to lease a large portion of the vacant space, during the three months ended March 31, 2014, did not execute a lease on the property. Consequently, we revised the holding period to coincide with the maturity of the mortgage loan in June 2014. Accordingly, we reduced the carrying value of this property to its estimated fair value, less cost to sell, and we recognized an impairment loss of $14.0 million during the three months ended March 31, 2014.

We also determined our property located in South Hadley, Massachusetts is at risk to become impaired in the future. We recently extended the lease on the property in South Hadley Massachusetts for one year, and it now expires in January 2015. There is a possibility we may have to impair this property in 2014 if we do not negotiate another lease extension on this building or find a replacement tenant.

We will continue to monitor our portfolio for any other indicators of impairment.

Our mortgage notes payable and line of credit as of ~~September 30, 2013~~March 31, 2014 and December 31, ~~2012~~2013 are summarized below (dollars in thousands):

As of ~~September 30, 2013,~~March 31, 2014, we had ~~34 fixed-rate~~37 mortgage notes payable, which were collateralized by a total of ~~68 properties.~~72 with a net book value of $553.4 million. Gladstone Commercial Corporation has limited recourse liabilities that could result from any one or more of the following circumstances: a borrower voluntarily filing for bankruptcy, improper conveyance of a property, fraud or material misrepresentation, misapplication or misappropriation of rents, security deposits, insurance proceeds or condemnation proceeds, or physical waste or damage to the property resulting from a borrower’s gross negligence or willful misconduct. We will also indemnify lenders against claims resulting from the presence of hazardous substances or activity involving hazardous substances in violation of environmental laws on a property. The weighted-average interest rate on the mortgage notes payable as of ~~September 30, 2013~~March 31, 2014 was ~~5.5%~~5.4%.

During the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September 30, 2013,~~March 31, 2014, we ~~issued four~~assumed one long-term ~~mortgages,~~mortgage, collateralized by two properties, which ~~are~~is summarized below (dollars in thousands):

Scheduled principal payments of mortgage notes payable for the remainder of 2014, and each of the five succeeding fiscal years and thereafter are as follows (dollars in thousands):

In November 2013, we entered into an interest rate cap agreement with Wells Fargo that caps the interest rate on the note payable for our Champaign, Illinois property. The agreement provides that the interest rate on the note payable for our Champaign, Illinois property is capped at a certain interest rate when one-month LIBOR is in excess of 3.0%. The fair value of the interest rate cap agreement is recorded in other assets on our accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets. We record changes in the fair value of the interest rate cap agreement quarterly based on the current market valuations at quarter end as other income (loss) on our accompanying condensed consolidated statements of operations. Generally, we will estimate the fair value of our interest rate cap using estimates of value provided by the counterparty and our own assumptions in the absence of observable market data, including estimated remaining life, counterparty credit risk, current market yield and interest rate spreads of similar securities as of the measurement date. At March 31, 2014, our interest rate cap agreement was valued using Level 3 inputs of the hierarchy established by ASC 820, “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures.” The following table summarizes the key terms of each interest rate cap agreement (dollars in thousands):


										As of March 31, 2014
Interest Rate Cap	Notional Amount		LIBOR Cap			Effective Date		Maturity Date		Cost		Fair Value
November 26, 2013	$	8,200		3.00	%		March 31, 2014		December 1, 2016	$	31	$	18

The fair value of all ~~fixed-rate~~ mortgage notes payable outstanding as of ~~September 30, 2013,~~March 31, 2014, was ~~$409.8~~$429.6 million, as compared to the carrying value stated above of ~~$409.0~~$426.8 million. The fair value is calculated based on a discounted cash flow analysis, using interest rates based on management’s estimate of market interest rates on long-term debt with comparable ~~terms.~~terms and loan to value ratios. The fair value was calculated using Level 3 inputs of the hierarchy established by ASC 820, “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures.”

~~Scheduled principal payments of mortgage notes payable for the remainder of 2013 and each of the five succeeding fiscal years and thereafter are as follows (in thousands):~~

In August 2013, we procured a ~~new~~ $60.0 million senior unsecured revolving credit facility, or the ~~New~~ Line of Credit, with Keybank National Association serving as a revolving lender, a letter of credit issuer and an administrative agent and Citizens Bank of Pennsylvania as an additional lender. On December 16, 2013, Comerica Bank was also added as an additional lender. On March 28, 2014, we amended our Line of Credit to extend the maturity date one additional year to August 2017. We also modified certain terms under the Line of Credit, including the calculation of the total asset value and unencumbered asset value. The ~~New~~applicable LIBOR margins were also reduced by 25 basis points at each pricing level. As a result of these modifications, the availability under our line of credit increased by $1.3 million.

The Line of Credit initially matures in August ~~2016;~~2017; however, we have a one-year extension option subject to the payment of an extension fee equal to 25 basis points on the initial maturity date and certain other customary conditions. The New Line of Credit replaced the Credit Agreement, dated as of December 28, 2010 with Capital One, N.A., as administrative agent, and the other lenders party thereto, or the Prior Line of Credit. The Prior Line of Credit provided for a senior secured revolving credit facility in the amount of $75.0 million and was originally scheduled to mature on December 28, 2013.

The ~~New~~ Line of Credit has a letter of credit sublimit of up to $20.0 million. In addition, we may expand the ~~New~~ Line of Credit up to a total of $75.0 million upon satisfaction of certain conditions, including obtaining commitments from any one or more lenders, whether or not currently a party to the ~~New~~ Line of Credit, to provide such increased amounts and payment of the associated up front and arrangement fees at the time of such increase. The interest rate per annum applicable to the ~~New~~ Line of Credit is equal to the ~~London Interbank Offered Rate, or~~ LIBOR plus an applicable margin of up to ~~3.25%~~3.0%, depending upon our leverage. The leverage ratio used in determining the applicable margin for interest on the ~~New~~ Line of Credit is recalculated quarterly. We are subject to an annual maintenance fee of $0.03 million per year and an unused commitment fee of 25 basis points per year, which accrues quarterly. Our ability to access this source of financing is subject to our continued ability to meet customary lending requirements, such as compliance with financial and operating covenants and our meeting certain lending limits. One such covenant requires us to limit distributions to our stockholders to 100% of our FFO, with acquisition-related costs required to be expensed under ASC 805 added back to FFO. In addition, the maximum amount we may draw under the ~~New~~ Line of Credit is based on a percentage of the value of a pool of unencumbered properties which must meet agreed upon eligibility standards.

If and when long-term mortgages are arranged for properties in the unencumbered pool, the banks will reduce the availability under the ~~New~~ Line of Credit by the amount advanced against that property’s value. Conversely, as we purchase new properties meeting the eligibility standards, we may add these new properties to the unencumbered pool to obtain additional availability under the ~~New~~ Line of Credit. The availability under the ~~New~~ Line of Credit is also reduced by letters of credit used in the ordinary course of business. We may use the advances under the ~~New~~ Line of Credit for both general corporate purposes and the acquisition of new investments.

As of ~~September 30, 2013,~~March 31, 2014, there was ~~$28.9~~$24.1 million outstanding under our ~~New~~ Line of Credit at an interest rate of approximately 3.2% and ~~$6.4~~$10.3 million outstanding under letters of credit at a weighted average interest rate of 3.0%. As of ~~September 30, 2013,~~March 31, 2014, the maximum additional amount we could draw was ~~$16.2~~$18.9 million. We were in compliance with all covenants under the ~~New~~ Line of Credit as of ~~September 30, 2013.~~March 31, 2014. The amount outstanding on the ~~New~~ Line of Credit as of ~~September 30, 2013~~March 31, 2014 approximates fair value, because the debt is ~~short-term.~~subject to a variable interest rate, determined by market forces, as well as a recently negotiated interest rate spread.

In February 2012, we completed a public offering of 1,540,000 shares of 7.125% Series C Cumulative Term Preferred Stock, par value $0.001 per share, or the Term Preferred Stock, at a public offering price of $25.00 per share. Gross proceeds of the offering totaled $38.5 million and net proceeds, after deducting offering expenses borne by us, were $36.7 million and were used to repay a portion of outstanding borrowings under our Line of Credit, for ~~acquistions~~acquisitions of real estate and for working capital. The Term Preferred Stock is traded under the ticker symbol GOODN on the NASDAQ Global Select Market, or the NASDAQ. The Term Preferred Stock is not convertible into our common stock or any other security of ours. Generally, we may not redeem shares of the Term Preferred Stock prior to January 31, 2016, except in limited circumstances to preserve our status as a REIT. On or after January 31, 2016, we may redeem the shares at a redemption price of $25.00 per share, plus any accumulated and unpaid dividends to and

including the date of redemption. The shares of the Term Preferred Stock have a mandatory redemption date of January 31, 2017. We incurred $1.8 million in total offering costs related to these transactions, which have been recorded as deferred financing costs on the condensed consolidated balance sheet and will be amortized over the redemption period ending January 31, 2017.

The Term Preferred Stock is recorded as liability in accordance with ASC 480, “Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity,” which states that mandatorily redeemable financial instruments should be classified as liabilities and therefore the related dividend payments are treated as a component of interest expense in the ~~statement~~condensed consolidated statements of operations.

The fair value of our Term Preferred Stock as of ~~September 30, 2013,~~March 31, 2014, was ~~$40.5~~$40.7 million, as compared to the carrying value stated above of $38.5 million. The fair value is calculated based on the closing share price as of ~~September 30, 2013~~March 31, 2014 of ~~$26.32.~~$26.40. The fair value was calculated using Level 1 inputs of the hierarchy established by ASC 820, “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures.”

We are obligated as lessee under three ground leases. Future minimum rental payments due under the terms of these leases for the remainder of ~~2013~~2014 and each of the five succeeding years and thereafter, are as follows ~~(in~~(dollars in thousands):


			For the three months ending December 31,		For the year ended December 31,													For the year ended December 31,
Location	Lease End Date		2013		2014		2015		2016		2017		2018		Thereafter		Lease End Date	2014		2015		2016		2017		2018		2019		Thereafter
Tulsa, OK		Apr-21	$	38	$	153	$	153	$	153	$	153	$	153	$	381	Apr-21	$	114	$	153	$	153	$	153	$	153	$	153	$	229
Dartmouth, MA		May-36		44		174		174		174		174		174		3,474	May-36		131		174		174		174		174		174		3,300
Springfield, MA		Feb-30		21		86		86		86		89		90		1,064	Feb-30		64		86		86		89		90		90		972

			$	103	$	413	$	413	$	413	$	416	$	417	$	4,919		$	309	$	413	$	413	$	416	$	417	$	417	$	4,501

Expenses recorded in connection ~~with~~to rental expense incurred for the properties listed above during both the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2014 and 2013, ~~and 2012 was $0.3 million.~~were $0.1 million, respectively. Rental expenses are reflected in property operating expenses on the condensed consolidated statements of operations.

We have committed to provide tenant improvement funding for certain properties. In addition, we have committed to provide financing to expand our building located in Canton, North Carolina. Future tenant improvement payments due on these properties for the remainder of 2014 and each of the five succeeding years and thereafter, are as follows (dollars in thousands):


		For the year ended December 31,
Location	Lease End Date	2014		2015		2016		2017		2018		2019		Thereafter
Canton, NC	Jul-24⁽¹⁾	$	3,325	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—
Concord Township, OH	Aug-34		150		—		—		—		—		—		—
Austin, TX	Jun-15		125		—		—		—		—		—		—
Hialeah, FL	Mar-27		35		—		—		—		—		—		—

		$	3,635	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—

The following table summarizes the changes in our stockholders’ equity for the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September 30, 2013 (in~~March 31, 2014 (dollars in thousands):


	Preferred Stock		Senior Common Stock		Common Stock		Capital in Excess of Par Value		Notes Receivable from Employees			Distributions in Excess of Accumulated Earnings			Total Stockholders’ Equity
Balance at December 31, 2013	$	2	$	—	$	16	$	298,751	$	(375	)	$	(115,248	)	$	183,146
Issuance of senior common stock and common stock, net		—		—		—		7,243		—			—			7,243
Distributions declared to common, senior common and preferred stockholders		—		—		—		—		—			(7,025	)		(7,025	)
Net loss		—		—		—		—		—			(13,514	)		(13,514	)

Balance at March 31, 2014	$	2	$	—	$	16	$	305,994	$	(375	)	$	(135,787	)	$	169,850

Our Board of Directors declared the following distributions per share for the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30, 2013~~March 31, 2014 and ~~2012:~~2013:


	For the three months ended September 30,				For the nine months ended September 30,				For the three months ended March 31,
	2013		2012		2013		2012		2014		2013
Common Stock	$	0.375	$	0.375	$	1.125	$	1.125	$	0.38	$	0.38
Senior Common Stock		0.2625		0.2625		0.7875		0.7875		0.26		0.26
Series A Preferred Stock		0.4843749		0.4843749		1.4531247		1.4531247		0.4843749		0.4843749
Series B Preferred Stock		0.46875		0.46875		1.4063		1.4063		0.4688		0.4688
Series C Preferred Stock⁽¹⁾		0.4453125		0.4453125		1.3359		1.1875		0.4453		0.4453

On April 29, 2013, we completed a public offering of 1,265,000 shares of our common stock at a public offering price of $18.90 per share. Gross proceeds of the offering totaled $23.9 million and net proceeds, after deducting offering expenses borne by us, were $22.6 million, which we used to acquire real estate.

On June 24, 2013, we completed a public offering of 1,320,000 shares of our common stock at a public offering price of $18.82 per share. On July 11, 2013, the underwriters partially exercised their option to purchase an additional 158,000 shares of common stock. Gross proceeds of the offering were $27.8 million and net proceeds, after deducting offering expenses borne by us, were $26.3 million, which we used to acquire real estate.

We have an open market sale agreement, or the ATM Program, with Jefferies LLC, or Jefferies, under which we may, from time to time, offer to sell shares of our common stock with an aggregate sales price of up to $25.0 million on the open market through Jefferies, as agent, or to Jefferies, as principal. During the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September 30, 2013,~~March 31, 2014, we raised approximately ~~$7.8~~$7.2 million in ~~gross~~net proceeds under the ATM Program. As of ~~September 30, 2013,~~March 31, 2014, under the existing program, we ~~had~~have sold a total of ~~762,478~~1.2 million shares with aggregate gross proceeds of ~~$14.0~~$21.4 million, and have a remaining capacity to sell up to ~~$11.0~~$3.6 million of common stock under the ATM Program with Jefferies.

In March 2011, we commenced an offering of an aggregate of 3,500,000 shares of our senior common stock, par value $0.001 per share, at a price to the public of $15.00 per share, of which 3,000,000 shares are intended to be offered pursuant to the primary offering and 500,000 shares are intended to be offered pursuant to our senior common distribution reinvestment plan, or the DRIP. We, however, reserve the right to reallocate the number of shares being offered between the primary offering and the DRIP. As of ~~September 30, 2013,~~March 31, 2014, we ~~have~~had sold ~~331,830~~333,604 shares of senior common stock in this ongoing offering, for gross proceeds of ~~$4.1~~$5.0 million, and issued an additional ~~6,741~~12,047 shares of senior common stock under the DRIP program.

The following table is a summary of the outstanding note ~~issued to~~receivable from an employee of the Adviser for the exercise of stock options (dollars in thousands):


Date Issued	Outstanding Balance of Employee Loan at September 30, 2013		Outstanding Balance of Employee Loans at December 31, 2012		Maturity Date of Note		Interest Rate on Note			Outstanding Balance of Employee Loan at March 31, 2014		Outstanding Balance of Employee Loan at December 31, 2013		Maturity Date of Note		Interest Rate on Note
Nov 2006	$	375	$	410		Nov 2015		8.15	%	$	375	$	375		Nov 2015		8.15	%

In accordance with ASC 505-10-45-2, “Equity,” receivables from employees for the issuance of capital stock to employees prior to the receipt of cash payment should be reflected in the balance sheet as a reduction to stockholders’ equity. Therefore, this note was recorded as a full recourse loan to the employee and is included in the equity section of the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets. As of ~~September 30, 2013,~~March 31, 2014, this loan maintained its full recourse status.

On ~~October~~April 4, 2014, our tenant occupying our Newburyport, Massachusetts property notified us of their intention not to exercise their renewal option. The tenant will continue paying rent and operating expenses through the lease termination date of April 30, 2015.

On April 8, ~~2013,~~2014, our Board of Directors declared the following monthly distributions:

On April 22, 2014, we acquired a 61,358 square foot office building located in Rancho Cordova, California for $8.2 million, excluding related acquisition expenses of $0.05 million. We funded this acquisition with existing cash on hand and the issuance of $4.9 million of mortgage debt on the property. The tenant has leased the property for 10 years and has 1 option to renew the lease for an additional 5 years. The lease provides for prescribed rent escalations over the life of the lease, with annualized straight line rents of $0.7 million.

~~Item 2.~~

~~Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations~~

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

All statements contained herein, other than historical facts, may constitute “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Exchange Act. These statements may relate to, among other things, future events or our future performance or financial condition. In some cases, you can identify forward-looking statements by terminology such as “may,” “might,” “believe,” “will,” “provided,” “anticipate,” “future,” “could,” “growth,” “plan,” “intend,” “expect,” “should,” “would,” “if,” “seek,” “possible,” “potential,” “likely” or the negative of such terms or comparable terminology. These forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause our business, financial condition, liquidity, results of operations, funds from operations or prospects to be materially different from any future business, financial condition, liquidity, results of operations, funds from operations or prospects expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. For further information about these and other factors that could affect our future results, please see the captions titled “Forward-Looking Statements” and “Risk Factors” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, ~~2012.~~2013. We caution readers not to place undue reliance on any such forward-looking statements, which are made pursuant to the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and, as such, speak only as of the date made. We undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, after the date of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

All references to “we,” “our,” “us” and the “Company” in this Report mean Gladstone Commercial Corporation and its consolidated subsidiaries, except where the context indicates that the term means only Gladstone Commercial Corporation.

We are an externally-advised real estate investment trust, or REIT, that was incorporated under the General Corporation Law of the State of Maryland on February 14, 2003, primarily for the purpose of investing in and owning net leased industrial, commercial and retail real property and selectively making long-term industrial and commercial mortgage loans. Our portfolio of real estate is leased to a wide cross section of tenants ranging from small businesses to large public companies, many of which are corporations that do not have publicly-rated debt. We have historically entered into, and intend in the future to enter into, purchase agreements for real estate having triple net leases with terms of approximately 10 to 15 years and built in rental rate increases. Under a triple net lease, the tenant is required to pay all operating, maintenance and insurance costs and real estate taxes with respect to the leased property. We actively communicate with buyout funds, real estate brokers and other third parties to locate properties for potential acquisition or to provide mortgage financing in an effort to build our portfolio. We currently own 8589 properties totaling ~~9.0~~9.3 million square feet, which have a total gross and net carrying value, including intangible assets and properties held for sale, of ~~$730.6~~$754.8 million and ~~$620.9~~$632.0 million, respectively. We do not currently have any mortgage loan receivables outstanding.

The United States, or U.S., ~~has been seeing~~continues to see long-term signs of recovery as the unemployment rate ~~has decreased over the last several months,~~continues to decline, housing starts and building permits have increased, and prices for single-family homes ~~increased across 20 U.S. cities~~continue to increase because of a dwindling surplus in the housing market. However, various signs of weakness are still present in the U.S economy. Vacancy rates in certain markets are still higher than pre-recessionary levels as job growth has yet to return to all areas of the country. Although interest rates have risen significantly ~~since~~in the ~~beginning of the~~past year, they still remain near their historic lows. This continued low interest rate environment is leading to increasing competition for new

~~acquisitions and cap rate compression.~~ acquisitions. However; ~~recent~~concerns linger over the ability of the U.S. ~~budget deficit concerns and~~Congress to pass additional debt ceiling legislation prior to March 2015 given the budget impasse that resulted in the partial shutdown of the U.S. government in October ~~2013, have increased the possibility of credit-rating downgrades of the U.S. and economic slowdowns.~~2013. The continued uncertainty surrounding the outcome ~~of these decisions and the ability~~ of the U.S. government to raise the federal debt ceiling could cause the ratings agencies to lower the long-term sovereign credit rating on the U.S. again. The sovereign credit rating was previously lowered from “AAA” to “AA+” by Standard and Poor’s in August 2011. The impact

of this or any further downgrades to the U.S. government’s sovereign credit rating, or its perceived creditworthiness, is inherently unpredictable and could adversely affect the U.S. and global financial markets and economic conditions. There can be no assurance that governmental or other measures to aid economic recovery will be effective. These developments and the government’s credit concerns in general, could cause interest rates and borrowing costs to rise, which may negatively impact our ability to access both the debt and equity markets on favorable terms. In addition, a further decrease to the U.S. credit rating could create broader financial turmoil and uncertainty, which may weigh heavily on our stock price. Continued adverse economic conditions could have a material adverse effect on one or more of our tenants, or our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We continue to focus on increasing our funds from operations, or FFO, by re-leasing vacant space in our ~~portfolio.~~portfolio and acquiring additional properties. As of ~~September 30, 2013,~~March 31, 2014, we had two fully vacant buildings ~~and one partially vacant building. Our vacant buildings are~~ located in Baytown, Texas and Richmond, Virginia. ~~Our building located in Roseville, Minnesota remains partially vacant.~~ The ~~leases on~~available space at these ~~three vacancies~~two properties comprised ~~3.3%~~less than 1.0% of our total square footage as of ~~September 30, 2013~~March 31, 2014 and the annual carrying costs are approximately ~~$1.0~~$0.3 million. We continue to actively seek new tenants for ~~our Richmond, Virginia, Baytown, Texas and Roseville, Minnesota buildings.~~both of these properties.

Our ability to make new investments is highly dependent upon our ability to procure external financing. Our principal sources of external financing generally include the issuance of equity securities, long-term mortgage loans secured by properties and borrowings under our line of credit, or the ~~New~~ Line of Credit. The market for long-term mortgages continues to improve and long-term mortgages have become more obtainable. The collateralized mortgage backed securities, or CMBS, market has ~~made a comeback,~~recovered, but it is more conservative and restrictive than it was prior to the recession and uncertainty with regard to interest rates has made the CMBS market less predictable. ~~Consequently, we~~We continue to look to regional banks, insurance companies and other non-bank lenders, in addition to the CMBS market to issue mortgages to finance our real estate activities.

In addition to leverage, we ~~have been~~were active in the equity markets during ~~2013~~the first quarter of 2014 by issuing shares of common stock ~~in two separate follow-on public offerings, issuing shares of our senior common stock and issuing shares and~~ under our at-the-market program, or ATM Program, pursuant to an open market sale agreement with Jefferies, LLC, or Jefferies, discussed in more detail below.

~~Egg Harbor Township, New Jersey:~~Allen and Colleyville, Texas: On March ~~28, 2013,~~27, 2014, we acquired two office buildings, totaling 42,000 square feet, located in Allen and Colleyville, Texas for a total of $10.0 million, excluding related acquisition expenses of $0.05 million. We funded these acquisitions with existing cash on hand as well as assuming $6.3 million of existing mortgage debt on the properties. The tenant has leased both properties for 12 years and has 4 options to renew the lease for additional periods of 5 years each. The lease provides for prescribed rent escalations over the life of the lease, with annualized straight line rents of $1.0 million.

Rancho Cordova, California: On April 22, 2014, we acquired a ~~29,257~~61,358 square foot office building located in ~~Egg Harbor Township, New Jersey~~Rancho Cordova, California for ~~$5.7~~$8.2 million, excluding related acquisition expenses of ~~$0.2~~$0.05 million. We funded this acquisition with existing cash on hand and the issuance of ~~$3.7~~$4.9 million of mortgage debt on the property. The tenant has leased the property for 10 years and has 1 option to renew the lease for an additional ~~period of~~ 5 years. The lease provides for prescribed rent escalations over the life of the lease, with annualized straight line rents of ~~$0.5~~$0.7 million.

~~Clintonville, Wisconsin~~2014 Sale Activity~~: On April 11, 2013, we funded a $3.3 million, 102,400 square foot expansion of~~

Sterling Heights, Michigan: The tenant in our property located in ~~Clintonville, Wisconsin. In connection~~Sterling Heights, Michigan exercised their right of first refusal, after receiving an unsolicited offer from a third party, to acquire this property. We expect the transaction to close in the next 60 days and have accordingly classified this property as held for sale. We considered this asset to be non-core to our long-term strategy and plan to re-deploy the proceeds consistent with ~~the expansion of the property, we executed a lease amendment to extend the lease for an additional eight years, through October 2028.~~our current acquisition strategy.

The lease was originally set to expire in October 2020. The lease was also amended to provide for an increase to the rental income over the life of the lease, with annualized straight line rents of approximately $1.0 million, up from $0.6 million today.

~~Vance, Alabama:~~ On May 9, 2013, we acquired a 170,000 square foot industrial building located in Vance, Alabama for $13.4 million, excluding related acquisition expenses of $0.2 million. We funded this acquisition with existing cash on hand. The tenant has leased the property for 10 years and has 2 options to renew the lease for additional periods of 5-years each. The lease provides for prescribed rent escalations over the life of the lease, with annualized straight line rents of $1.2 million.

~~Blaine, Minnesota~~: On May 10, 2013, we acquired a 92,275 square foot office building located in Blaine, Minnesota for $14.4 million, excluding related acquisition expenses of $0.1 million. We funded this acquisition with existing cash on hand. The tenant has seven years remaining on the lease and has two options to renew the lease for additional periods of five-years each. The lease provides for prescribed rent escalations over the life of the lease, with annualized straight line rents of $1.5 million.

~~Austin, Texas~~: On July 9, 2013, we acquired a 320,000 square foot office building located in Austin, Texas for $57.0 million, excluding related acquisition expenses of $0.2 million. We funded this acquisition with cash proceeds from our recent common stock offering and the issuance of $35.3 million of mortgage debt on the property. The tenant has seven years remaining on the lease and has three options to renew the lease for additional periods of three years each. The lease provides for prescribed rent escalations over the life of the lease, with annualized straight line rents of $4.7 million.

~~Allen, Texas~~: On July 10, 2013, we acquired an 115,200 square foot office building located in Allen, Texas for $15.2 million, excluding related acquisition expenses of $0.1 million. We funded this acquisition with existing cash on hand and the issuance of $8.9 million of mortgage debt on the property. There are two tenants in this property, the largest of which occupies 73% of the space and has nine years remaining on the lease and has two options to renew the lease for additional periods of five years each. The other tenant has eight years remaining on the lease and also has two options to renew the lease for additional periods of five years each. These two leases provide for prescribed rent escalations over the life of the leases, with annualized straight line rents of $1.5 million.

~~Citigroup~~Wells Fargo: On March ~~28, 2013,~~27, 2014, through atwo wholly-owned ~~subsidiary,~~subsidiaries, we ~~borrowed $3.7~~assumed $6.3 million pursuant to a long-term note payable from ~~Citigroup Global Markets Realty Corp.,~~Wells Fargo, which is collateralized by a security interest in two of our properties. The note accrues interest at a fixed rate of 5.583% per year and the note has a maturity date of February 2016. We assumed the note in connection with the acquisition of the two properties located in Allen and Colleyville, Texas.

KeyBank Line of Credit: On March 28, 2014, we amended our Line of Credit to extend the maturity date one additional year to August 2017. We also modified certain terms under the Line of Credit, including the calculation of the total asset value and unencumbered asset value. The applicable LIBOR margins were also reduced by 25 basis points at each pricing level. As a result of these modifications, the availability under our line of credit increased by $1.3 million.

KeyBank: On April 22, 2014, through a wholly-owned subsidiary, we borrowed $4.9 million pursuant to a long-term note payable from KeyBank National Association, which is collateralized by a security interest in one of our properties. The note accrues interest at a fixed rate of 4.16% per year and we may not repay this note prior to the last two months of the term, or we would be subject to a prepayment penalty. The note has a maturity date of April 6, 2023. We used the proceeds from the note to acquire the property in Egg Harbor Township, New Jersey on the same date.

~~Prudential~~: On July 3, 2013, through a wholly-owned subsidiary, we borrowed $8.2 million pursuant to a long-term note payable from Prudential Mortgage Capital Company, LLC, which is collateralized by a security interest in one of our properties. The note accrues interest at a fixed rate of 5.0%4.9% per year and we may not repay this note prior to the last three months of the term, or we would be subject to a prepayment penalty. The note has a maturity date of ~~August~~May 1, ~~2023. We used the proceeds from the note to acquire properties.~~

~~Cantor Commercial Real Estate~~: On July 9, 2013, through a wholly-owned subsidiary, we borrowed $35.3 million pursuant to a long-term note payable from Cantor Commercial Real Estate Lending, L.P., which is collateralized by a security interest in one of our properties. The note accrues interest at a fixed rate of 4.81% per year and we may not repay this note prior to the last three months of the term, or we would be subject to a prepayment penalty. The note has a maturity date of August 6, 2023.2024. We used the proceeds from the note to acquire the property in ~~Austin, Texas on the same date.~~

~~Synovus Bank~~: On July 10, 2013, through a wholly-owned subsidiary, we borrowed $8.9 million pursuant to a long-term note payable from Synovus Bank, which is collateralized by a security interest in one of our properties. The note accrues interest at a fixed rate of 4.2% per year and we may prepay this note prior to maturity without penalty. The note has a maturity date of August 1, 2023. We used the proceeds from the note to acquire the property in Allen, TexasRancho Cordova, California on the same date.

~~Keybank Line of Credit:~~On August 7, 2013, we procured a new $60.0 million senior unsecured revolving credit facility, or the New Line of Credit, with Keybank National Association serving as a revolving lender, a letter of credit issuer and an administrative agent, and Citizens Bank of Pennsylvania as an additional lender. This New Line of Credit has an initial maturity of August 2016, with a one-year extension option contingent upon an extension fee equal to 25 basis points on the initial maturity date, and certain other customary conditions. The interest rate per annum is equal to the London Interbank Offered Rate, or LIBOR, plus an applicable margin of up to 3.25%, depending upon our leverage.

~~Champaign, Illinois~~Newburyport, Massachusetts: On ~~January 14, 2013, we extended the lease with the~~April 4, 2014, our tenant occupying our Newburyport, Massachusetts property ~~located in Champaign, Illinois.~~notified us of their intention not to exercise their renewal option. The ~~lease covering this property was extended for an additional 11 years,~~tenant will continue paying rent and operating expenses through ~~December 2024. The lease was originally set to expire in December 2013. The lease provides for prescribed rent escalations over the life of~~ the lease ~~with annualized straight line rents~~termination date of ~~approximately $1.4 million. In connection with the extension of the lease and the modification of certain terms under the lease, we paid $0.4 million in leasing commissions.~~April 30, 2015.

~~Akron, Ohio:~~ On April 10, 2013, we extended the lease with the tenant occupying our property located in Akron, Ohio. The lease covering this property was extended for an additional 10 years, through January 2024. The lease was originally set to expire in January 2014. The lease provides for prescribed rent escalations over the life of the lease, with annualized straight line rents of approximately $0.3 million. In connection with the extension of the lease and the modification of certain terms under the lease, we provided a tenant allowance of $0.5 million.

~~Hazelwood, Missouri~~: On July 17, 2013, we executed a revised lease with a tenant to occupy our previously vacant property located in Hazelwood, Missouri. The lease commences on August 1, 2013 and expires in May 2023. The tenant has two options to purchase the property: one in March 2017 and the other in May 2023. The lease provides for prescribed rent escalations over the life of the lease, with annualized straight line rents of approximately $0.2 million. In connection with the extension of the lease and the modification of certain terms under the lease, we paid $0.1 million in leasing commissions and $0.3 million in tenant improvements.

~~South Hadley, Massachusetts~~: On August 7, 2013, we extended the lease with the tenant occupying our property located in South Hadley, Massachusetts. The lease covering this property was extended for an additional year, through January 2015. The lease was originally set to expire in January 2014. The lease provides a scheduled rent increase over the previous lease, with annualized straight line rents of approximately $0.3 million. In connection with the extension of the lease and the modification of certain terms under the lease, we paid $3,400 in leasing commissions.

~~Lexington, North Carolina~~: On August 15, 2013, we extended the lease with the tenant occupying our property located in Lexington, North Carolina. The lease covering this property was extended for an additional 12 years, through April 2026. The lease was originally set to expire in April 2014. The lease provides for prescribed rent escalations over the life of the lease, with annualized straight line rents of approximately $0.4 million. In connection with the extension of the lease and the modification of certain terms under the lease, we provided a tenant allowance of $0.05 million, and we paid $0.2 million in leasing commissions.

~~Crenshaw, Pennsylvania~~: On August 15, 2013, we extended the lease with the tenant occupying our property located in Crenshaw, Pennsylvania. The lease covering this property was extended for an additional 12 years, through April 2026. The lease was originally set to expire in April 2014. The lease provides for prescribed rent escalations over the life of the lease, with annualized straight line rents of approximately $0.7 million. In connection with the extension of the lease and the modification of certain terms under the lease, we provided a tenant allowance of $0.08 million, and we paid $0.4 million in leasing commissions.

The equity issuances summarized below were issued under our universal shelf registration statement (File No. ~~333-169290)~~333-190931) that was effective and on file with the Securities and Exchange Commission at the time of each respective issuance.

~~Common Equity~~: During the nine months ended September 30, 2013, we completed two separate public offerings for a total of 2,743,000 shares of our common stock. We issued 1,265,000 shares of common stock in the first offering, which closed on April 29, 2013, at a public offering price of $18.90 per share. Gross proceeds of this offering totaled $23.9 million and net proceeds, after deducting offering expenses and underwriter discounts, were $22.6 million. We issued 1,478,000 shares of common stock in the second offering, which closed on June 24, 2013, with a partial exercise of the over-allotment option closing on July 11, 2013, at a public offering price of $18.82 per share. Gross proceeds of this offering totaled $27.8 million and net proceeds, after deducting offering expenses and underwriter discounts, were $26.3 million. Proceeds from these offerings were used to acquire real estate and for general corporate purposes.

ATM Program: During the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September 30, 2013,~~March 31, 2014, we raised approximately ~~$7.7~~$7.2 million in net proceeds under our ATM Program with Jefferies. ~~We used the proceeds~~Proceeds from this offering were used to ~~fund our acquisition in Egg Harbor Township, New Jersey~~acquire real estate and for general corporate purposes. Under this agreement we may, from time to time, offer to sell shares of our common stock with an aggregate sales price of up to $25.0 million on the open market through Jefferies, as agent, or to Jefferies, as principal, based upon our instructions (including any price, time or size limits or other customary parameters or conditions that we may impose). Sales of shares of our common stock through Jefferies will be executed by means of ordinary brokers’ transactions on the NASDAQ Global Select Market, or the NASDAQ, or otherwise at market prices, in privately negotiated transactions, crosses or block transactions, as may be agreed between us and Jefferies, including a combination of any of these transactions.

Senior Common Equity: During the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September 30, 2013,~~March 31, 2014, we sold ~~155,873,~~25,625 shares of our senior common stock at $15.00 per share in an ongoing best-efforts public offering and issued ~~5,346~~2,795 shares of our senior common stock under the Dividend Reinvestment Plan, or DRIP, program. The net proceeds, after deducting the underwriting discount and commission were ~~$2.1~~$0.3 million. We can issue up to 3,000,000 shares of senior common stock and the offering will continue until the earlier of March 28, 2015 or the date on which a total of 3,000,000 shares of senior common stock are sold. ~~We have~~Proceeds from this offering were used ~~the proceeds of the offering~~to acquire real estate and for general corporate ~~purposes and to acquire additional real estate.~~purposes.

Gladstone Management Corporation, or our Adviser, seeks to diversify our portfolio to avoid dependence on any one particular tenant, industry or geographic market. By diversifying our portfolio, our Adviser intends to reduce the adverse effect on our portfolio of a single under-performing investment or a downturn in any particular industry or geographic market. The table below reflects the breakdown of our total rental income by tenant industry classification for the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2014 and 2013, ~~and 2012,~~ respectively (dollars in thousands):


	For the nine months ended September 30,										For the three months ended March 31,
	2013					2012					2014					2013
Industry Classification	Rental Income		Percentage of Rental Income			Rental Income		Percentage of Rental Income			Rental Income		Percentage of Rental Income			Rental Income		Percentage of Rental Income
Telecommunications	$	7,322		16.8	%	$	5,370		14.3	%	$	3,069		18.5	%	$	2,334		17.0	%
Automobile												2,296		13.8			632		4.6
Healthcare		5,605		12.8			3,856		10.4			1,875		11.3			1,379		10.1
Electronics												1,378		8.3			1,009		7.4
Personal, Food & Miscellaneous Services		3,899		8.9			1,411		3.8			1,332		8.0			1,235		9.0
Electronics		3,604		8.3			4,656		12.5
Automobile		3,455		7.9			1,314		3.5
Diversified/Conglomerate Manufacturing		2,748		6.3			2,747		7.4			916		5.5			914		6.7
Chemicals, Plastics & Rubber		2,399		5.5			2,366		6.4			839		5.1			789		5.8
Beverage, Food & Tobacco		2,260		5.2			2,062		5.5			748		4.5			761		5.6
Personal & Non-Durable Consumer Products		1,937		4.4			1,851		5.0			651		3.9			644		4.7
Machinery		1,696		3.9			1,694		4.6			583		3.5			565		4.1
Buildings and Real Estate												542		3.3			538		3.9
Containers, Packaging & Glass		1,650		3.8			1,758		4.7			521		3.1			586		4.3
Buildings and Real Estate		1,618		3.7			1,601		4.3
Printing & Publishing		1,389		3.2			1,420		3.8			460		2.8			473		3.5
Oil & Gas		956		2.2			953		2.6			319		1.9			319		2.3
Diversified/Conglomerate Services		933		2.1			933		2.5			311		1.9			311		2.3
Banking		866		2.0			862		2.3			289		1.7			287		2.1
Education		492		1.1			1,526		4.1			164		1.0			612		4.5
Childcare		437		1.0			437		1.2			160		1.0			146		1.1
Home & Office Furnishings		397		0.9			397		1.1			132		0.8			132		1.0

	$	43,663		100.0	%	$	37,214		100.0	%	$	16,585		100.0	%	$	13,666		100.0	%

The table below reflects the breakdown of our total rental income by state for the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2014 and 2013, ~~and 2012,~~ respectively (dollars in thousands):


	For the nine months ended September 30,							For the nine months ended September 30,							For the three months ended March 31,							For the three months ended March 31,
	2013							2012							2014							2013
State	Number of Leases		Rental Revenue		% of Base Rent			Number of Leases		Rental Revenue		% of Base Rent			Number of Leases		Rental Revenue		% of Base Rent			Number of Leases		Rental Revenue		% of Base Rent
Texas																9	$	2,535		15.3	%		5	$	1,041		7.6	%
Ohio		14	$	6,965		16.0	%		14	$	6,333		17.0	%		14		2,319		14.0	%		14		2,332		17.1	%
Texas		7		4,414		10.1	%		5		1,965		5.3	%
North Carolina		7		3,584		8.2	%		7		3,585		9.6	%		7		1,210		7.3	%		7		1,198		8.8	%
Minnesota																4		1,180		7.1	%		3		812		5.9	%
South Carolina		2		3,346		7.7	%		1		1,441		3.9	%		2		1,115		6.7	%		2		1,116		8.2	%
Minnesota		4		3,011		6.9	%		3		4,023		10.8	%
All Other States		37		22,343		51.1	%		33		19,867		53.4	%		39		8,226		49.6	%		35		7,167		52.4	%

Total		71	$	43,663		100	%		63	$	37,214		100	%		75	$	16,585		100	%		66	$	13,666		100	%

Our Adviser is led by a management team with extensive experience purchasing real estate and originating mortgage loans. Our Adviser is controlled by Mr. David Gladstone, our chairman and chief executive officer. Mr. Gladstone is also the chairman and chief executive officer of our Adviser. Terry Lee Brubaker, our vice chairman and chief operating officer, is also the vice chairman and chief operating officer of our Adviser. Gladstone Administration, LLC, or our Administrator, employs our chief financial officer and

treasurer, chief compliance officer, internal counsel and secretary and their respective staffs. Mr. Gladstone is also the chairman and chief executive officer of our Administrator. Terry Lee Brubaker is also the vice chairman and chief operating officer of our Administrator.

Our Adviser and Administrator also provide investment advisory and administrative services, respectively, to certain of our affiliates, including, but not limited to, Gladstone Capital Corporation and Gladstone Investment Corporation, both publicly-traded business development companies, as well as Gladstone Land

Corporation, a ~~publicly traded~~publicly-traded, agricultural real estate company. With the exception of Ms. Danielle Jones, our chief financial officer and treasurer, and Mr. Robert Cutlip, our president, all of our executive officers and all of our directors serve as either directors or executive officers, or both, of Gladstone Capital Corporation and Gladstone Investment Corporation. In addition, with the exception of our president, all of our executive officers and all of our directors, with the exception of Mr. David Dullum, serve as either directors or executive officers, or both, of Gladstone Land Corporation. In the future, our Adviser may provide investment advisory services to other companies, both public and private.

We are externally managed pursuant to contractual arrangements with our Adviser and our Administrator. Our Adviser and Administrator employ all of our personnel and pay their payroll, benefits and general expenses directly. We have an investment advisory agreement with our Adviser, or the Advisory Agreement, and an administration agreement with our Administrator, or the Administration Agreement.

Under the terms of the Advisory Agreement, we are responsible for all expenses incurred for our direct benefit. Examples of these expenses include legal, accounting, interest on short-term debt and mortgages, tax preparation, directors’ and officers’ insurance, stock transfer services, stockholder-related fees, consulting and related fees. In addition, we are also responsible for all fees charged by third parties that are directly related to our business, which include real estate brokerage fees, mortgage placement fees, lease-up fees and transaction structuring fees (although we may be able to pass some or all of such fees on to our tenants and borrowers).

The Advisory Agreement provides for an annual base management fee equal to 2.0% of our total stockholders’ equity, less the recorded value of any preferred stock and adjusted to exclude the effect of any unrealized gains, losses or other items that do not affect realized net income (including impairment charges), or total common stockholders’ equity, and for an incentive fee based on FFO. Our Adviser does not charge acquisition or disposition fees when we acquire or dispose of properties as is common with other externally-advised REITs; however, our Adviser may earn fee income from our borrowers or tenants or other sources.

For purposes of calculating the incentive fee, FFO includes any realized capital gains and capital losses, less any distributions paid on preferred stock and senior common stock, but FFO does not include any unrealized capital gains or ~~losses.~~losses (including impairment charges). The incentive fee would reward our Adviser if our quarterly FFO, before giving effect to any incentive fee, or pre-incentive fee FFO, exceeds 1.75%, or the hurdle rate, of total common stockholders’ equity. We pay our Adviser an incentive fee with respect to our pre-incentive fee FFO quarterly as follows:

The incentive fee may be reduced because of a covenant which exists in our Line of Credit agreement which limits distributions to our stockholders to 100% of FFO with acquisition-related costs that are required to be expensed under ASC 805, Business Combinations, added back to FFO. In order to comply with this covenant, our Board of Directors accepted our Adviser’s offer to unconditionally, irrevocably and voluntarily waive on a quarterly basis a portion of the incentive fee for the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2014 and 2013, ~~and 2012,~~ which allowed us to maintain the current level of distributions to our stockholders. These waived fees may not be recouped by our Adviser in the future. Our Adviser has indicated that it intends to continue to waive all or a portion of the incentive fee in order to support the current level of distributions to our stockholders; however, our Adviser is not required to issue any such waiver, either in whole or in part.

Pursuant to the Administration Agreement, we pay for our allocable portion of our Administrator’s overhead expenses incurred while performing its obligations to us, including, but not limited to, rent and the salaries and benefits expenses of our personnel, including our chief financial officer and treasurer, chief compliance officer, internal counsel and secretary, ~~investor relations department~~ and their respective staffs. Our allocable portion of expenses is generally derived by multiplying our Administrator’s total expenses by the percentage of our total assets at the beginning of each quarter in comparison to the total assets of all companies managed by our Adviser under similar agreements.

The preparation of our financial statements in accordance with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles in the U.S., or GAAP, requires management to make judgments that are subjective in nature in order to make certain estimates and assumptions. Application of these accounting policies involves the exercise of judgment regarding the use of assumptions as to future uncertainties, and as a result, actual results could materially differ from these estimates. A summary of all of our significant accounting policies is provided in Note 1 to our condensed consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this Form 10-Q. Below is a summary of accounting polices involving estimates and assumptions that require complex, subjective or significant judgments in their application and that materially affect our results of operations. There were no material changes to our critical accounting policies during the quarter ended ~~September 30, 2013.~~March 31, 2014.

When we acquire real estate, we allocate the purchase price to (i) the acquired tangible assets and liabilities, consisting of land, building, tenant improvements and long-term debt and (ii) the identified intangible assets and liabilities, consisting of the value of above-market and below-market leases, in-place leases, unamortized lease origination costs, tenant relationships and capital lease obligations, based in each case on their fair values in accordance with ASC 805, Business Combinations. All expenses related to the acquisition are expensed as incurred.

Our Adviser estimates value using methods similar to those used by independent appraisers (e.g., discounted cash flow analysis). Factors considered by management in its analysis include an estimate of

carrying costs during hypothetical expected lease-up periods, considering current market conditions and costs to execute similar leases. Our Adviser also considers information obtained about each property as a

result of our pre-acquisition due diligence, marketing and leasing activities in estimating the fair value of the tangible and intangible assets and liabilities acquired. In estimating carrying costs, management also includes real estate taxes, insurance and other operating expenses and estimates of lost rentals at market rates during the hypothetical expected lease-up periods, which primarily range from 9 to 18 months, depending on specific local market conditions. Our Adviser also estimates costs to execute similar leases, including leasing commissions, legal and other related expenses to the extent that such costs are not already incurred in connection with a new lease origination as part of the transaction. Our Adviser also considers the nature and extent of our existing business relationships with the tenant, growth prospects for developing new business with the tenant, the tenant’s credit quality and management’s expectations of lease renewals (including those existing under the terms of the lease agreement), among other factors. A change in any of the assumptions above, which are very subjective, could have a material impact on our results of operations.

The allocation of the purchase price directly affects the following in our condensed consolidated financial statements:

We periodically review the carrying value of each property to determine if circumstances that indicate impairment in the carrying value of the investment exist or that depreciation periods should be modified. In determining if impairment exists, our Adviser considers such factors as our tenants’ payment histories, the financial condition of our tenants, including calculating the current leverage ratios of tenants, the likelihood of lease renewal, business conditions in the industries in which our tenants operate and whether the carrying value of our real estate has decreased. If any of the factors above indicate the possibility of impairment, we prepare a projection of the undiscounted future cash flows, without interest charges, of the specific property and determine if the carrying amount of such property is recoverable. In preparing the projection of undiscounted future cash flows, we estimate the holding periods of the properties and cap rates using information that we obtain from market comparability studies and other comparable sources. If impairment were indicated, the carrying value of the property would be written down to its estimated fair value, less cost to sell, based on our best estimate of the property’s discounted future cash flows using assumptions from market participants. Any material changes to the estimates and assumptions used in this analysis could have a significant impact on our results of operations, as the changes would impact our determination of whether impairment is deemed to have occurred and the amount of impairment loss that we would recognize.

Using the methodology discussed above we evaluated our entire portfolio as of ~~September 30, 2013~~March 31, 2014 for any impairment indicators and performed an impairment analysis on those select properties that had an indication of impairment. WeSubsequently, we concluded that ~~none of~~ our ~~properties were~~Roseville, Minnesota property was impaired as of ~~September 30, 2013; however, we~~March 31, 2014. We determined that ~~our~~the expected undiscounted cash flows based upon a revised estimated holding period of this property was below the current carrying value. The estimated holding

period was revised after a potential tenant that we were anticipating to lease a large portion of the vacant space, during the three months ended March 31, 2014, did not execute a lease on the property. Consequently, we revised the holding period to coincide with maturity of the mortgage loan on the property in June 2014. Accordingly, we reduced the carrying value of this property to its estimated fair value, less cost to sell, and we recognized an impairment loss of $14.0 million during the three months ended March 31, 2014.

Our property located in South Hadley, Massachusetts ~~may~~is at risk to become impaired in the future. We recently extended the lease on ~~this~~the property in South Hadley Massachusetts for one year, and it now expires in January 2015. There is a possibility we may have to impair ~~the~~this property in 2014 if we do not negotiate another lease extension on this building or find a replacement tenant.

We will continue to monitor our portfolio for any other indicators of impairment. There have been no other impairments recognized on our real estate assets since inception.

The weighted-average yield on our total portfolio, which was ~~8.8%~~9.0% as of ~~September 30, 2013,~~March 31, 2014, is calculated by taking the annualized straight-line rents, reflected as rental income on our condensed consolidated statements of operations, of each acquisition as a percentage of the acquisition. The weighted-average yield does not account for the interest expense incurred on the mortgages placed on our properties.

A comparison of our operating results for the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2014 and 2013 ~~and 2012~~ is below (dollars in thousands, except per share ~~data)~~amounts):

   For the nine months ended September 30,
   2013 2012 $ Change % Change
Operating revenues

Rental income
   $ 43,663    $ 37,214    $ 6,449    17 %
Tenant recovery revenue
   819    264    555    210 %


Total operating revenues
   44,482    37,478    7,004    19 %


Operating expenses

Depreciation and amortization
   16,374    12,172    4,202    35 %
Property operating expenses
   2,164    1,031    1,133    110 %
Acquisition related expense
   622    805    (183 ) -23 %
Base management fee
   1,363    1,120    243    22 %
Incentive fee
   3,001    2,614    387    15 %
Administration fee
   1,004    846    158    19 %
General and administrative
   1,243    1,130    113    10 %


Total operating expenses before credit to incentive fee
   25,771    19,718    6,053    31 %


Credit to incentive fee
   (2,491 ) (1,794 ) (697 ) 39 %


Total operating expenses
   23,280    17,924    5,356    30 %


Other income (expense)

Interest expense
   (17,998 ) (14,687 ) (3,311 ) 23 %
Distributions attributable to Series C mandatorily redeemable preferred stock
   (2,057 ) (1,829 ) (228 ) 12 %
Other income
   47    109    (62 ) -57 %


Total other expense
   (20,008 ) (16,407 ) (3,601 ) 22 %


Net income
   1,194    3,147    (1,953 ) -62 %


Distributions attributable to Series A and B preferred stock
   (3,070 ) (3,070 ) —      0 %
Distributions attributable to senior common stock
   (204 ) (71 ) (133 ) 187 %


Net (loss) income available to common stockholders
   $ (2,080 ) $ 6    $ (2,086 ) -34767 %


Net (loss) income available to common stockholders per weighted average share of common stock - diluted
   $ (0.16 ) $ 0.00    $ (0.16 ) NM ⁽¹⁾


FFO available to common stockholders
   $ 14,294    $ 12,178    $ 2,116    17 %


FFO per weighted average share of common stock - diluted
   $ 1.11    $ 1.10    $ 0.01    1 %

Rental ~~income~~revenues increased for ~~both~~ the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30, 2013,~~March 31, 2014, as compared to the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30, 2012,~~March 31, 2013, because of the ~~seven~~eight properties acquired subsequent to ~~September 30, 2012, partially offset by a loss of rental income due to vacancies in our portfolio subsequent to September 30, 2012.~~March 31, 2013.

Tenant recovery revenue increased for ~~both~~ the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30, 2013,~~March 31, 2014, as compared to the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30, 2012.~~March 31, 2013. This increase was primarily due to reimbursements from our tenant in our partially vacant building located in Roseville, Minnesota.

Depreciation and amortization expenses increased for the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30, 2013,~~March 31, 2014, as compared to the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30, 2012,~~March 31, 2013, because of the ~~seven~~eight properties acquired subsequent to ~~September 30, 2012.~~March 31, 2013.

Property operating expenses consist of franchise taxes, management fees, insurance, ground lease payments and overhead expenses paid on behalf of certain of our properties. Property operating expenses increased for ~~both~~ the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30, 2013,~~March 31, 2014, as compared to the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30, 2012,~~March 31, 2013, primarily because of an increase in overhead (maintenance, repair and utilities) expenses at our partially vacant Roseville, Minnesota building.

Acquisition related ~~expense~~expenses primarily ~~consists~~consist of legal fees and fees incurred for third-party reports prepared in connection with potential acquisitions and our due diligence analyses related thereto. Acquisition related ~~expense increased~~expenses decreased for the three months ended ~~September 30, 2013,~~March 31, 2014, as compared to the

three months ended ~~September 30, 2012, as a result~~March 31, 2013, because of ~~acquiring two properties during the three months ended September 30, 2013,~~lower costs incurred for acquisitions in 2014 as compared to acquiring only one property during the three months ended September 30, 2012. Acquisition related expense decreased for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 as compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2012, as a result of acquiring five properties during the nine months ended September 30, 2013, as compared to the six properties acquired during the nine months ended September 30, 2012.2013.

The base management fee increased for the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30, 2013,~~March 31, 2014, as compared to the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30, 2012,~~March 31, 2013, due to an increase in total common stockholders’ equity, the main component of the calculation. The calculation of the base management fee is described in detail above under“Advisory and Administration Agreements.”

The incentive fee increased for ~~both~~ the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30, 2013,~~March 31, 2014, as compared to the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30, 2012,~~March 31, 2013, because of an increase in pre-incentive fee FFO. The increase in pre-incentive fee FFO was due to an increase in rental revenues from the ~~acquisitions~~properties acquired ~~subsequent to September 30, 2012,~~over the past year, which was partially offset by an increase in property operating and interest expenses during the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30, 2013,~~March 31, 2014, as compared to the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30, 2012.~~March 31, 2013. The impairment loss recorded during the three months ended March 31, 2014 is not included in the calculation of the incentive fee because it is an unrealized loss.

The incentive fee credit increased for ~~both~~ the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30, 2013,~~March 31, 2014, as compared to the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30, 2012,~~March 31, 2013, because of an increase in the amount of common dividends paid from the shares issued during ~~2013.~~the past year coupled with higher expenses at our vacant properties. The calculation of the incentive fee is described in detail above within“Advisory and Administration Agreements.”

The administration fee increased for ~~both~~ the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30, 2013,~~March 31, 2014, as compared to the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30, 2012,~~March 31, 2013, as a result of an increase in the amount of the total expenses our Administrator incurred during the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30, 2013,~~March 31, 2014, coupled with a larger percentage of the fee being allocated to us as a result of ~~the increase in~~ our higher total assets in comparison to the other funds managed by our Administrator during the ~~last 12 months.~~three months ended March 31, 2014. The calculation of the administration fee is described in detail above within “Advisory and Administration Agreements.”

General and administrative expenses increased for ~~both~~ the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30, 2013,~~March 31, 2014, as compared to the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30, 2012,~~March 31, 2013, as a result of an increase in professional fees related to tax and audit ~~work~~services from the increase in our ~~portfolio.~~portfolio and timing of fees incurred related to our annual report and proxy.

Interest expense increased for the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30, 2013,~~March 31, 2014, as compared to the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30, 2012.~~March 31, 2013. This increase was primarily a result of interest on the ~~$123.3~~$82.6 million of mortgage

debt assumed and issued induring the past 12 months, partially offset by reduced interest expense on our long-term financings from amortizing and balloon principal payments made during the ~~last 12~~three months March 31, 2013.

Other income increased during the three months ended March 31, 2014, as compared to the year ended March 31, 2013, because of an increase in ~~connection with~~management fees collected from certain of our ~~acquisitions made during that time.~~tenants.

~~Distributions on our mandatorily redeemable preferred stock remained flat~~Net Loss Attributable to Common Stockholders

Net loss attributable to common stockholders increased for the three months ended ~~September 30, 2013,~~March 31, 2014, as compared to the three months ended September 30, 2012, because our mandatorily redeemable preferred stock was outstanding during both periods. Distributions for our mandatorily redeemable preferred stock increased for the nine months ended September 30,March 31, 2013, as compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2012, because the public offering of shares of our Term Preferred Stock was completed in February 2012, and thus was not outstanding for the full nine months ended September 30, 2012.

~~Other income decreased during both the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013, as compared to the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012,~~primarily because of ~~lower interest income on employee loans earned~~the impairment loss recognized during the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30, 2013, as compared~~March 31, 2014 and, to ~~the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012~~a lesser extent, due to ~~principal repayments made by employees of our Adviser during the past 12 months.~~

Net (loss) income available to common stockholders decreased for both the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013, as compared to the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012, primarily because of increased interest expense, property operating expenses and depreciation expense, ~~and increased distributions to our preferred stockholders from the issuance of our 7.125% Series C Cumulative Term Preferred Stock, or the Term Preferred Stock,~~ partially offset by an increase in rental income earned from the 7eight properties acquired induring the past 12 months.

Our sources of liquidity include cash flows from operations, cash and cash equivalents, borrowings under our ~~New~~ Line of Credit, obtaining mortgages on our unencumbered properties and issuing additional equity securities. Our available liquidity at ~~September 30, 2013,~~March 31, 2014, was ~~$20.7~~$24.7 million, including ~~$4.5~~$5.8 million in cash and cash equivalents and an available borrowing capacity of ~~$16.2~~$18.9 million under our ~~New~~ Line of Credit.

We actively seek conservative investments that are likely to produce income to pay distributions to our stockholders. We intend to use the proceeds received from future equity raised and debt capital borrowed to continue to invest in industrial, commercial and retail real property, make mortgage loans, or pay down outstanding borrowings under our ~~New~~ Line of Credit. Accordingly, to ensure that we are able to effectively execute our business strategy, we routinely review our liquidity requirements and continually evaluate all potential sources of liquidity. Our short-term liquidity needs include proceeds necessary to fund our distributions to stockholders, pay the debt service costs on our existing long-term mortgages and on borrowings under our Line of Credit, and fund our current operating costs. Our long-term liquidity needs include proceeds necessary to grow and maintain our portfolio of investments.

We believe that our available liquidity is sufficient to fund our distributions to stockholders, pay the debt service costs on our existing long-term mortgages and borrowings under our Line of Credit and fund our current operating costs in the near term. Additionally, to satisfy our short-term obligations, we may request credits to our management fees that are issued from our Adviser, although our Adviser is under no obligation to provide any such credits, either in whole or in part. Historically, our Adviser has provided such partial credits to our management fees on a quarterly basis. We further believe that our cash flow from operations coupled with the financing capital available to us in the future are sufficient to fund our long-term liquidity needs.

During ~~2013,~~the three months ended March 31, 2014, we raised ~~$51.7~~$7.3 million of common equity ~~in two follow-on public offerings,~~under our ATM Program, or ~~$48.9~~$7.2 million in net proceeds, at an average share price of ~~$18.86. We also raised $7.8 million of common equity under our ATM Program, or $7.7 million in net proceeds, at an average share price of $18.72.~~$17.48. Furthermore, we raised ~~$2.1~~$0.3 million in net proceeds of senior common equity. We used these proceeds to acquire additional real estate ~~repay a portion of the outstanding balance of the New Line of Credit, with the remainder used~~and for general corporate ~~and working capital needs.~~purposes.

As of today, we have the ability to raise up to ~~$299.5~~$266.0 million of additional equity capital through the sale and issuance of securities that are registered under our universal shelf registration statement on Form S-3 (File No. 333-190931), or the Universal Shelf, in one or more future public offerings. Of the ~~$299.5~~$266.0 million of available capacity under our Universal Shelf, ~~$11.0~~$3.6 million of common stock is reserved for additional sales under our ATM Program and ~~$47.3~~$47.5 million is reserved for sales of our senior common stock.

As of ~~September 30, 2013,~~March 31, 2014, we had ~~fixed-rate~~ mortgage notes payable in the aggregate principal amount of ~~$409.0~~$426.8 million, collateralized by a total of 6872 properties with terms at issuance ranging from 54 years to 1725 years. The weighted-average interest rate on the mortgage notes payable as of ~~September 30, 2013~~March 31, 2014 was ~~5.5%~~5.4%.

The CMBS market has ~~returned,~~recovered; see the discussion in “~~Overview –~~ Business Environment” above. Specifically, we continue to see banks and other non-bank lenders willing to issue 10-year mortgages. Consequently, we are focused on obtaining mortgages through regional banks, non-bank lenders and ~~CMBS.~~the CMBS market.

We have mortgage debt in the aggregate principal amount of ~~$10.5~~$22.8 million payable during the remainder of ~~2013~~2014 and ~~$25.2~~$42.6 million payable during ~~2014.~~2015. The ~~2013 and~~ 2014 principal amounts payable include both amortizing principal payments and a balloon principal ~~payments~~payment due in ~~December 2013 of $8.5 million and~~ June 2014 of $17.5 ~~million. We have signed a term sheet with a lender to refinance~~million on our property that we impaired during the ~~debt that matures in December of 2013, and anticipate closing on this in the near-term.~~quarter. We are ~~also initiating~~currently in conversations with ~~other lenders~~the lender in advance of the maturity in June 2014 ~~and anticipate being able to extend the maturity dates or refinance with new lenders.~~for a mutually acceptable solution. We intend to pay the ~~2013 and~~remaining 2014 debt amortization payments from operating cash flow and borrowings under our ~~New~~ Line of Credit.

Net cash provided by operating activities during the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September 30, 2013,~~March 31, 2014, was ~~$15.6~~$6.2 million, as compared to net cash provided by operating activities of ~~$18.6~~$3.1 million for the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September 30, 2012.~~March 31, 2013. This ~~decrease~~increase was primarily a result of ~~a decrease in our account payables and leasing commissions paid, partially offset by~~ an increase in rental income received from the properties acquired in the past 12 ~~months.~~months, partially offset by the loss of rental income from vacancies in our portfolio and property operating expenses we are responsible for at certain of our vacant properties. The majority of cash from operating activities is generated from the rental payments that we receive from our tenants. We utilize this cash to fund our property-level operating expenses and use the excess cash primarily for debt and interest payments on our mortgage notes payable, interest payments on our ~~New~~ Line of Credit, distributions to our stockholders, management fees to our Adviser, and other entity-level expenses.

Net cash used in investing activities during the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September 30, 2013,~~March 31, 2014, was ~~$111.0~~$6.3 million, which primarily consisted of the acquisition of ~~five~~two properties ~~the expansion at another property~~ and tenant improvements performed at certain of our properties during the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September 30, 2013,~~March 31, 2014, as compared to net cash used in investing activities during the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September 30, 2012,~~March 31, 2013, of ~~$55.6~~$5.3 million, which primarily consisted of the acquisition of ~~six properties,~~one property, coupled with tenant improvements performed at certain of our ~~properties and net payments to our lenders for reserves.~~properties.

Net cash used in financing activities during the three months ended March 31, 2014, was $2.6 million, which primarily consisted of distributions paid to our stockholders and principal repayments on mortgage notes payable, partially offset by proceeds from the sale of common stock. Net cash provided by financing activities ~~during~~for the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2013, was ~~$94.4~~$4.0 million, which primarily consisted of proceeds from the sale of common stock, ~~and proceeds from the issuance~~net borrowings on our Line of mortgage notes payable, partially offset by the increase in distributions paid to our stockholders and principal repayments on mortgage notes payable. Net cash provided by financing activities for the nine months ended September 30, 2012, was $48.4 million, which primarily consisted of proceeds from the sale of our Term Preferred StockCredit and proceeds from the issuance of mortgage notes payable, partially offset by distributions paid to our stockholders and principal repayments on mortgage notes ~~payable and net repayments on our Prior Line of Credit.~~payable.

In August 2013, we procured the $60.0 million ~~New~~ Line of Credit, with Keybank National Association serving as a revolving lender, a letter of credit issuer and an administrative agent and Citizens Bank of Pennsylvania as an additional lender. Comerica Bank was subsequently added as an additional lender in

December 2013. On March 28, 2014, we amended our Line of Credit to extend the maturity date a year to August 2017. We also modified certain terms under the Line of Credit, including the calculation of the total asset value and unencumbered asset value. The ~~New~~applicable LIBOR margins were also reduced 25 basis points at each pricing level. As a result of these modifications, the availability under our line of credit increased by $1.3 million.

The ~~New~~ Line of Credit has a letter of credit sublimit of up to $20.0 million. In addition, we may expand the ~~New~~ Line of Credit up to a total of $75.0 million upon satisfaction of certain conditions ~~including obtaining commitments from any one or more lenders, whether or not currently party to the New Line of Credit, to provide such increased amounts~~ and payment of the associated up front and arrangement fees at the time of such increase. The interest rate per annum applicable to the ~~New~~ Line of Credit is equal to the London Interbank Offered Rate, or LIBOR, plus an applicable margin of up to ~~3.25%~~3.0%, depending upon our leverage. The leverage ratio used in determining the applicable margin for interest on the ~~New~~ Line of Credit is recalculated quarterly. We are subject to an annual maintenance fee of $0.03 million per year and an unused commitment fee of 25 basis points per year, which accrues quarterly. Our ability to access this source of financing is subject to our continued ability to meet customary lending requirements, such as compliance with financial and operating covenants and our meeting certain lending limits. One such covenant requires us to limit distributions to our stockholders to 100% of our FFO, with acquisition-related costs required to be expensed under ASC 805 added back to FFO. In addition, the maximum amount we may draw under the ~~New~~ Line of Credit is based on a percentage of the value of a pool of unencumbered properties, which must meet agreed upon eligibility standards.

As of ~~September 30, 2013,~~March 31, 2014, there was ~~$28.9~~$24.1 million outstanding under our ~~New~~ Line of Credit at an interest rate of approximately 3.2% and ~~$6.4~~$10.3 million outstanding under letters of credit at a weighted average interest rate of 3.0%. ~~Subsequent to the end of the quarter, we received $2.8 million of letters of credit back, and our current outstanding letters of credit are now $3.6 million.~~ As of ~~November 4, 2013,~~April 28, 2014, the maximum additional amount we could draw was ~~$17.6~~$21.8 million. Our ability to increase the availability under our ~~New~~ Line of Credit is dependent upon us adding additional properties to the unencumbered pool, which must meet predetermined eligibility standards. We were in compliance with all covenants under the ~~New~~ Line of Credit as of ~~September 30, 2013.~~March 31, 2014.

The following table reflects our material contractual obligations as of ~~September 30, 2013 (in~~March 31, 2014 (dollars in thousands):


	Payments Due by Period										Payments Due by Period
Contractual Obligations	Total		Less than 1 Year		1-3 Years		3-5 Years		More than 5 Years		Total		Less than 1 Year		1-3 Years		3-5 Years		More than 5 Years
Debt Obligations⁽¹⁾	$	476,395	$	62,665	$	110,023	$	133,017	$	170,690	$	488,635	$	24,934	$	208,404	$	77,046	$	178,251
Interest on Debt Obligations⁽²⁾		127,727		25,617		43,228		22,836		36,046		122,050		24,369		42,944		21,177		33,560
Operating Lease Obligations⁽³⁾		7,094		413		825		831		5,025		6,886		369		825		833		4,859
Purchase Obligations⁽⁴⁾												3,635		3,635		—		—		—

Total	$	611,216	$	88,695	$	154,076	$	156,684	$	211,761	$	621,206	$	53,307	$	252,173	$	99,056	$	216,670

We did not have any off-balance sheet arrangements as of ~~September 30, 2013.~~March 31, 2014.

The National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts, or NAREIT, developed FFO as a relevant non-GAAP supplemental measure of operating performance of an equity REIT, to recognize that income-producing real estate historically has not depreciated on the same basis determined under GAAP. FFO, as defined by NAREIT, is net income (computed in accordance with GAAP), excluding gains or losses from sales of property and impairment losses on property, plus depreciation and amortization of real estate assets, and after adjustments for unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures.

FFO does not represent cash flows from operating activities in accordance with GAAP, which, unlike FFO, generally reflects all cash effects of transactions and other events in the determination of net income and should not be considered an alternative to net income as an indication of our performance or to cash flows from operations as a measure of liquidity or ability to make distributions. Comparison of FFO, using the NAREIT definition, to similarly titled measures for other REITs may not necessarily be meaningful due to possible differences in the application of the NAREIT definition used by such REITs.

FFO available to common stockholders is FFO adjusted to subtract distributions made to holders of preferred and senior common stock. We believe that net income available to common stockholders is the most directly comparable GAAP measure to FFO available to common stockholders.

Basic funds from operations per share, or Basic FFO per share, and diluted funds from operations per share, or Diluted FFO per share, is FFO available to common stockholders divided by the number of weighted average shares of common stock outstanding and FFO available to common stockholders divided by the number of weighted average shares of common stock outstanding on a diluted basis, respectively, during a period. We believe that FFO available to common stockholders, Basic FFO per share and Diluted FFO per share are useful to investors because they provide investors with a further context for evaluating our FFO results in the same manner that investors use net income and earnings per share, or EPS, in evaluating net income available to common stockholders. In addition, because most REITs provide FFO available to common stockholders, Basic FFO and Diluted FFO per share information to the investment community, we believe these are useful supplemental measures when comparing us to other REITs. We believe that net

income is the most directly comparable GAAP measure to FFO, Basic EPS is the most directly comparable GAAP measure to Basic FFO per share, and that diluted EPS is the most directly comparable GAAP measure to Diluted FFO per share.

The following table provides a reconciliation of our FFO available to common stockholders for the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2014 and 2013, ~~and 2012,~~ to the most directly comparable GAAP measure, net income available to common stockholders, and a computation of basic and diluted FFO per weighted average share of common stock:


	For the three months ended September 30,						For the nine months ended September 30,						For the three months ended March 31, (Dollars in Thousands, Except Per Share Amounts)
	2013			2012			2013			2012			2014			2013
	(Dollars in Thousands, Except Per Share Data)						(Dollars in Thousands, Except Per Share Data)
Net income	$	309		$	992		$	1,194		$	3,147
Net (loss) income													$	(13,514	)	$	433
Less: Distributions attributable to preferred and senior common stock		(1,106	)		(1,053	)		(3,274	)		(3,141	)		(1,123	)		(1,076	)

Net (loss) income available to common stockholders	$	(797	)	$	(61	)	$	(2,080	)	$	6
Net loss attributable to common stockholders													$	(14,637	)	$	(643	)

Adjustments:
Add: Real estate depreciation and amortization		6,253			4,276			16,374			12,172			6,720			4,901
Add: Impairment charge														13,958			—

FFO available to common stockholders	$	5,456		$	4,215		$	14,294		$	12,178		$	6,041		$	4,258

Weighted average common shares outstanding - basic		14,196,423			10,945,379			12,613,354			10,945,379			15,746,714			11,230,647
Weighted average common shares outstanding - diluted		14,453,852			11,039,250			12,830,364			11,022,682			16,063,693			11,362,666
Diluted net (loss) income per weighted average share of common stock	$	(0.06	)	$	(0.01	)	$	(0.16	)	$	0.00

Basic FFO per weighted average share of common stock	$	0.38		$	0.39		$	1.13		$	1.11		$	0.38		$	0.38

Diluted FFO per weighted average share of common stock	$	0.38		$	0.38		$	1.11		$	1.10		$	0.38		$	0.37

Distributions declared per share of common stock	$	0.375		$	0.375		$	1.125		$	1.125		$	0.375		$	0.375

We are subject to market risks. Market risk includes risks that arise from changes in interest rates, foreign currency exchange rates, commodity prices, equity prices and other market changes that affect market sensitive instruments. The primary risk that we believe we are and will be exposed to is interest rate risk. Certain of our leases contain escalations based on market indices, and the interest rate on our ~~New~~ Line of Credit is variable. Although we seek to mitigate this risk by structuring such provisions of our loans and leases to contain a minimum interest rate or escalation rate, as applicable, these features do not eliminate this risk. To ~~date,~~that end, we have ~~not~~ entered into ~~any~~a derivative ~~contracts~~contract with Wells Fargo to ~~attempt~~cap interest rates for the variable rate note payable on our Champaign, Illinois property. We paid a fee of $0.03 million to ~~further manage~~cap LIBOR rates at 3.0%, to limit our exposure to interest ~~rate fluctuations.~~rates on this note payable.

To illustrate the potential impact of changes in interest rates on our net income for the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30, 2013,~~March 31, 2014, we have performed the following analysis, which assumes that our balance sheet remains constant and that no further actions beyond a minimum interest rate or escalation rate are taken to alter our existing interest rate sensitivity.

The following table summarizes the annual impact of a 1%, 2% and 3% increase in the one month LIBOR as of ~~September 30, 2013.~~March 31, 2014. As of ~~September 30, 2013,~~March 31, 2014, our effective average LIBOR was ~~0.18%~~0.152%; thus, a 1%, 2% or 3% decrease could not occur.


	(Dollars in Thousands)							(Dollars in Thousands)
Interest Rate Change	Increase to Rental Income		Increase to Interest Expense		Net Decrease to Net Income			Increase to Interest Expense		Net Decrease to Net Income
1% Increase to LIBOR	$	—	$	293	$	(293	)	$	327	$	(327	)
2% Increase to LIBOR		—		586		(586	)		655		(655	)
3% Increase to LIBOR		—		879		(879	)		941		(941	)

As of ~~September 30, 2013,~~March 31, 2014, the fair value of our ~~fixed rate~~ mortgage debt outstanding was ~~$409.8~~$429.6 million. Interest rate fluctuations may affect the fair value of our ~~fixed rate~~ debt instruments. If interest rates on our ~~fixed rate~~ debt instruments, using rates at ~~September 30, 2013,~~March 31, 2014, had been one percentage point higher or lower, the fair value of those debt instruments on that date would have decreased or increased by ~~$22.0~~$21.7 million and ~~$12.7~~$12.8 million, respectively.

In the future, we may be exposed to additional effects of interest rate changes, primarily as a result of our ~~New~~ Line of Credit or long-term mortgage debt, which we use to maintain liquidity and fund expansion of our real estate investment portfolio and operations. Our interest rate risk management objectives are to limit the impact of interest rate changes on earnings and cash flows and to lower overall borrowing costs. To achieve these objectives, we will borrow primarily at fixed rates or variable rates with the lowest margins available and, in some cases, with the ability to convert variable rates to fixed rates. We may also enter into derivative financial instruments such as interest rate swaps and caps in order to mitigate the interest rate risk on a related financial instrument. We will not enter into derivative or interest rate transactions for speculative purposes.

In addition to changes in interest rates, the value of our real estate is subject to fluctuations based on changes in local and regional economic conditions and changes in the creditworthiness of lessees and borrowers, all of which may affect our ability to refinance debt, if necessary.

As of ~~September 30, 2013,~~March 31, 2014, our management, including our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, ~~and treasurer,~~ evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and ~~procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)).~~procedures. Based on that evaluation, management, including the chief executive officer and chief financial officer, concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of ~~September 30, 2013,~~March 31, 2014 in providing a reasonable level of assurance that information we are required to disclose in reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in applicable ~~Securities and Exchange Commission~~SEC rules and forms, including providing a reasonable level of assurance that information required to be disclosed by us in such reports is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our chief executive officer and our chief financial officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. However, in evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures, management recognized that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated can provide only reasonable assurance of necessarily achieving the desired control objectives, and management was required to apply its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures.

There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the quarter ended ~~September 30, 2013,~~March 31, 2014, that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

~~Neither we nor any of our subsidiaries~~We are not currently subject to any material legal proceedings, nor, to our knowledge, is any material legal proceeding threatened against ~~us or our subsidiaries.~~us.

Our business is subject to certain risks and events that, if they occur, could adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations and the trading price of our securities. For a discussion of these risks, please refer to the section captioned “Item 1A. Risk Factors” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, ~~2012,~~2013, filed by us with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February ~~19, 2013.~~18, 2014.

~~The failure~~Item 2. Unregistered Sales of ~~U.S. lawmakers to reach an agreement on the national debt ceiling or a budget could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition~~Equity Securities and ~~results~~Use of ~~operations.~~Proceeds

On October 16, 2013, the U.S. Congress passed legislation to reopen the government through January 15, 2014 and effectively suspend the debt ceiling through February 7, 2014 to permit broader negotiations over budget issues. In the event U.S. lawmakers fail to reach a viable agreement on the national debt ceiling or a budget, the U.S. could default on its obligations, which could negatively impact the trading market for U.S. government securities. This may, in turn, negatively affect our ability to obtain financing for our investments. As a result, it may materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and resultsSales of ~~operations.~~Unregistered Securities

On August 5, 2011, Standard & Poor’s downgraded its long-term sovereign credit rating on the U.S. to AA+ for the first time due to the U.S. Congress’ inability to reach an effective agreement on the national debt ceiling and a budget in a timely manner. The current U.S. debt ceiling and budget deficit concerns have increased the possibility of the credit-rating agencies further downgrading the U.S. credit rating. On October 15, 2013, Fitch Ratings Service placed the U.S. credit rating on negative watch, warning that a failure by the U.S. Government to honor interest or principal payments on U.S. treasury securities would impact its decision on whether to downgrade the U.S. credit rating. Fitch also stated that the manner and duration of an agreement to raise the debt ceiling and resolve the budget impasse, as well as the perceived risk of such events occurring in the future, would weigh on its ratings.

The impact of any further downgrades to the U.S. government’s sovereign credit rating, or its perceived creditworthiness, and deteriorating sovereign debt conditions in Europe, is inherently unpredictable and could adversely affect the U.S. and global financial markets and economic conditions. There can be no assurance that governmental or other measures to aid economic recovery will be effective. These developments and the government’s credit concerns in general could cause interest rates and borrowing costs to rise, which may negatively impact our ability to access the debt markets on favorable terms. In addition, the decreased credit rating could create broader financial turmoil and uncertainty, which may weigh heavily on our stock price. Continued adverse economic conditions could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.



31.2		Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herewith).

32.1		Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (furnished herewith).



32.2		Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (furnished herewith).

101.INS***		XBRL Instance Document

101.SCH***		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document

101.CAL***		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document

101.LAB***		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document

101.PRE***		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document

101.DEF***		XBRL Definition Linkbase

Pursuant to Rule 406T of Regulation S-T, the Interactive Data Files on Exhibit 101 hereto are deemed not filed or part of a registration statement or prospectus for purposes of Sections 11 or 12 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, are deemed not filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and otherwise are not subject to liability under those sections.

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.


MARYLAND		02-0681276
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

1521 WESTBRANCH DRIVE, SUITE ~~200~~100 MCLEAN, VIRGINIA		22102
(Address of principal executive offices)		(Zip Code)


~~PART I~~
	~~FINANCIAL INFORMATION~~	PAGE

~~Item 1.~~ PART I	~~Financial Statements (Unaudited)~~

	~~Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012~~FINANCIAL INFORMATION	3

	~~Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012~~	4

	~~Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012~~	5

	~~Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements~~	6

~~Item 2.~~	~~Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations~~	24

~~Item 3.~~	~~Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk~~	42

~~Item 4.~~	~~Controls and Procedures~~	43

~~PART II~~	~~OTHER INFORMATION~~

Item 1.	~~Legal Proceedings~~Financial Statements (Unaudited)

	Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013	443

	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013	4

	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013	5

	Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements	6

Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	23

Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	37

Item 4.	Controls and Procedures	38

PART II	OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1.	Legal Proceedings	39

Item 1A.	Risk Factors	4439

Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	4439

Item 3.	Defaults Upon Senior Securities	4439

Item 4.	Mine Safety Disclosures	4539

Item 5.	Other Information	4539

Item 6.	Exhibits	4539

SIGNATURES		4842


Location	Acquisition/ Expansion Date		Square Footage		Lease Term	Renewal Options		Total Purchase/ Expansion Price		Acquisition Expenses		Annualized Straight Line Rent		Debt Issued
Egg Harbor Township, NJ		3/28/2013		29,257	10 years		1 (5 years)	$	5,650	$	152	$	490	$	3,700
Clintonville, WI⁽¹⁾		4/11/2013		102,400	15 years		N/A		3,250		N/A		961		—
Vance, AL		5/8/2013		170,000	10 years		2 (5 year options)		13,388		186		1,173		—
Blaine, MN		5/10/2013		92,275	6.9 years		2 (5 year options)		14,450		79		1,475		8,200
Austin, TX		7/9/2013		320,000	8 years		3 (3 year options)		57,000		155		4,641		35,300
Allen, TX		7/10/2013		115,200	11.5 years		2 (5 year options)		15,150		81		1,478		8,900

Total				829,132				$	108,888	$	653	$	10,218	$	56,100


Location	Acquisition Date		Square Footage		Lease Term		Renewal Options	Total Purchase Price		Acquisition Expenses		Annualized Straight Line Rent		Debt Assumed
Allen, TX		3/27/2014		21,154		12 Years	4 (5 years each)	$	5,525	$	26	$	570	$	3,481
Colleyville, TX		3/27/2014		20,355		12 Years	4 (5 years each)		4,523		26		467		2,849

Total				41,509				$	10,048	$	52	$	1,037	$	6,330


	Land		Building		Tenant Improvements		In-place Leases		Leasing Costs		Customer Relationships		Above Market Leases		Below Market Leases			Total Purchase Price
Egg Harbor Township, NJ	$	1,627	$	2,735	$	282	$	558	$	189	$	259	$	—	$	—		$	5,650
Vance, AL		457		9,721		808		1,097		678		627		—		—			13,388
Blaine, MN		1,060		9,347		1,172		1,361		694		816		—		—			14,450
Austin, TX		2,330		37,207		6,814		6,118		1,906		3,793		—		(1,168	)		57,000
Allen, TX		2,699		5,758		2,187		1,525		1,146		1,499		336		—			15,150

	$	8,173	$	64,768	$	11,263	$	10,659	$	4,613	$	6,994	$	336	$	(1,168	)	$	105,638


			For the three months ended March 31, 2013
Location	Acquisition Date		Rental Revenue		Earnings⁽¹⁾
Egg Harbor Township, NJ		3/28/2013	$	5	$	3

			$	5	$	3


Intangible Assets & Liabilities	2013		2012
In-place leases		8.8		10.7
Leasing costs		8.8		10.7
Customer relationships		13.5		15.1
Above market leases		8.8		10.1
Below market leases		7.2		11.3

All intangible assets & liabilities		9.9		12.1


						Principal Balance Outstanding
Date of Issuance/ Assumption	Principal Maturity Date		Stated Interest Rate at September 30, 2013 ⁽¹⁾			September 30, 2013		December 31, 2012
02/21/06		12/01/13		5.91	%	$	8,511	$	8,658
02/21/06		06/30/14		5.20	%		17,603		17,930
08/25/05		09/01/15		5.33	%		19,793		20,074
09/12/05		09/01/15		5.21	%		11,664		11,821
09/06/07		12/11/15		5.81	%		4,080		4,141
12/21/05		01/08/16		5.71	%		17,922		18,155
03/29/06		04/01/16		5.92	%		16,507		16,669
04/27/06		05/05/16		6.58	%		12,817		13,080
08/29/08		06/01/16		6.80	%		5,744		5,866
06/20/11		06/30/16		6.08	%		11,210		11,341
11/22/06		12/01/16		5.76	%		13,397		13,558
12/22/06		01/01/17		5.79	%		20,487		20,731
02/08/07		03/01/17		6.00	%		13,775		13,775
06/05/07		06/08/17		6.11	%		14,042		14,163
10/15/07		11/08/17		6.63	%		14,906		15,072
09/26/12		07/01/18		5.75	%		10,550		10,707
11/18/11		11/01/18		4.50	%		4,180		4,256
12/06/11		12/06/19		6.00	%		8,099		8,272
10/28/11		11/01/21		6.00	%		6,971		7,068
04/05/12		05/01/22		6.10	%		18,578		18,821
06/21/12		07/06/22		5.05	%		4,641		4,712
08/03/12		07/31/22		5.00	%		2,932		2,979
07/24/12		08/01/22		5.60	%		9,455		9,661
10/01/12		10/01/22		4.86	%		33,369		33,888
11/21/12		12/06/22		4.04	%		18,673		19,000
03/28/13		04/06/23		4.16	%		3,666		—
07/03/13		08/01/23		5.00	%		8,191		—
07/10/13		08/01/23		4.20	%		8,889		—
07/09/13		08/06/23		4.81	%		35,261		—
12/15/10		12/10/26		6.63	%		9,650		9,983
05/16/12		12/31/26		4.30	%		2,846		2,897
11/08/12		02/01/27		5.69	%		13,936		14,145
05/30/12		05/10/27		6.50	%		4,725		4,883
06/27/12		07/01/29		5.10	%		1,925		1,984

Contractual Fixed-Rate Mortgage Notes Payable:						$	408,995	$	358,290

Premiums and (Discounts), net:							767		895

Total Fixed-Rate Mortgage Notes Payable:						$	409,762	$	359,185

Variable-Rate Line of Credit:
08/07/13		08/07/16		LIBOR +3.00	%	$	28,900	$	25,000

Total Mortgage Notes Payable and Line of Credit						$	438,662	$	384,185


			Carrying Value at
	Encumbered properties at March 31, 2014		March 31, 2014		December 31, 2013		Stated Interest Rates at March 31, 2014⁽⁴⁾	Scheduled Maturity Dates at March 31, 2014
Mortgage and Other Secured Loans:
Fixed rate mortgage loans		68	$	417,837	$	413,678	(1)	(2)
Variable rate mortgage loans		4		8,200		8,200	LIBOR + 2.15%⁽³⁾	12/1/2016
Premiums and discounts (net)		N/A		810		724	N/A	N/A

Total Mortgage Notes Payable		72	$	426,847	$	422,602

Variable rate Line of Credit		16		24,100		24,400	LIBOR + 3.00%⁽³⁾	8/1/2017

Total Mortgage Notes Payable and Line of Credit		88	$	450,947	$	447,002


Date of Issuance	Issuing Bank	Borrowings		Interest Rate			Maturity Date
3/28/2013	Citigroup Global Markets Realty Corp.	$	3,700		4.16	%		4/6/2023
7/3/2013	Prudential Mortgage Capital Company LLC		8,200		5.00	%		8/1/2023
7/9/2013	Cantor Commercial Real Estate Lending		35,300		4.81	%		8/6/2023
7/10/2013	Synovus Bank		8,900		4.20	%		8/1/2023

		$	56,100


Year	Scheduled Principal Payments
Nine Months ending December 31, 2014	$	22,764
2015		42,564
2016		94,787
2017		66,749
2018		19,317
2019		12,681
Thereafter		167,175

	$	426,037


	Preferred Stock		Senior Common Stock		Common Stock		Capital in Excess of Par Value		Notes Receivable from Employees			Distributions in Excess of Accumulated Earnings			Total Stockholders’ Equity
Balance at December 31, 2012	$	2	$	—	$	11	$	215,470	$	(410	)	$	(92,708	)	$	122,365

Issuance of senior common stock and common stock, net		—		—		3		58,689		—			—			58,692
Repayment of principal on employee notes receivable		—		—		—		—		35			—			35
Distributions declared to common, senior common and preferred stockholders		—		—		—		—		—			(17,429	)		(17,429	)
Net income		—		—		—		—		—			1,194			1,194

Balance at September 30, 2013	$	2	$	—	$	14	$	274,159	$	(375	)	$	(108,943	)	$	164,857


Record Date	Payment Date	Common Stock Distributions per Share		Series A Preferred Distributions per Share		Series B Preferred Distributions per Share		Series C Preferred Distributions per Share
October 22, 2013	October 31, 2013	$	0.125	$	0.1614583	$	0.15625	$	0.1484375
November 14, 2013	November 29, 2013		0.125		0.1614583		0.15625		0.1484375
December 16, 2013	December 31, 2013		0.125		0.1614583		0.15625		0.1484375

Total		$	0.375	$	0.4843749	$	0.46875	$	0.4453125


Senior Common Stock Distributions
Payable to the Holders of Record During the Month of:	Payment Date	Distribution per Share
October	November 7, 2013	$	0.0875
November	December 6, 2013		0.0875
December	January 8, 2014		0.0875

Total		$	0.2625


	Land		Building		Tenant Improvements		In-place Leases		Leasing Costs		Customer Relationships		Above Market Leases		Below Market Leases			Discount on Assumed Debt			Total Purchase Price
Ashburn, VA	$	706	$	6,551	$	1,307	$	804	$	908	$	499	$	—	$	—		$	—		$	10,775
Ottumwa, IA		212		4,743		329		940		484		499		—		(107	)		—			7,100
New Albany, OH		1,658		7,511		1,235		1,122		857		903		47		—			—			13,333
Columbus, GA		1,378		3,894		626		574		473		375		—		—			—			7,320
Columbus, OH		542		1,856		597		391		213		325		113		—			—			4,037
Jupiter, FL		1,160		11,249		745		1,603		701		909		—		—			(867	)		15,500

	$	5,656	$	35,804	$	4,839	$	5,434	$	3,636	$	3,510	$	160	$	(107	)	$	(867	)	$	58,065


Senior Common Stock Distributions
Payable to the Holders of Record During the Month of:	Payment Date	Distribution per Share
April	May 7, 2014	$	0.0875
May	June 6, 2014		0.0875
June	July 8, 2014		0.0875

Total		$	0.2625


Exhibit Number		Exhibit Description

3.1		Articles of Restatement of the Registrant, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (File No. 001-33097), filed April 30, 2012.

3.2		Bylaws of the Registrant, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-11 (File No. 333-106024), filed June 11, 2003.

3.3		First Amendment to Bylaws of the Registrant, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 ofto the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 001-33097), filed July 10, 2007.

4.1		Form of Certificate for Common Stock of the Registrant, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Pre-Effective Amendment No. 2 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-11 (File No. 333-106024), filed August 8, 2003.

4.2		Form of Certificate for 7.75% Series A Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock of the Registrant, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 ofto the Registrant’s Form 8-A12G (File No. 000-50363), filed January 19, 2006.

4.3		Form of Certificate for 7.50% Series B Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock of the Registrant, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 ofto the Registrant’s Form 8-A12B (File No. 001-33097), filed October 19, 2006.

4.4		Form of Certificate for 7.125% Series C Cumulative Term Preferred Stock of the Registrant, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.4 ofto the Registrant’s ~~Current Report on~~ Form 8-A12B (File No. 001-33097), filed January 31, 2012.

10.1		First Amendment to Credit Agreement, dated as of ~~August 7, 2013,~~March 28, 2014, by and among Gladstone Commercial Limited Partnership, as borrower, the Registrant and certain of its wholly owned subsidiaries, as guarantors, each of the financial institutions initially a signatory thereto together with their successors and assignees, as lenders, and KeyBank National Association, as lender and administrative agent, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 ofto the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 001-33097), filed ~~August 9, 2013.~~

~~10.2~~		Unconditional Guaranty of Payment and Performance, dated as of August 7, 2013, by the Registrant, AL13 Brookwood LLC, CMS06-3 LLC, EI07 Tewksbury MA LLC, NJT06 Sterling Heights MI LLC, RB08 Concord OH LLC, DBPI07 Bolingbrook IL LLC, RCOG07 Georgia LLC, APML07 Hialeah FL LLC for the benefit of KeyBank National Association, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 001-33097), filed August 9, 2013.March 31, 2014.

11		Computation of Per Share Earnings from Operations (included in the notes to the unaudited financial statements contained in this Report).

12		Statements re: computation of ratios (filed herewith).

31.1		Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herewith).


	Gladstone Commercial Corporation

Date: ~~November 4, 2013~~April 28, 2014	By:	/s/ Danielle Jones
		Danielle Jones
		~~Danielle Jones~~ Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer

Date: ~~November 4, 2013~~April 28, 2014	By:	/s/ David Gladstone
		David Gladstone
		~~David Gladstone~~ Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of Directors

Large accelerated filer

~~Accelerated~~Non-accelerated filer

~~Non-accelerated~~Accelerated filer

¨x (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Smaller reporting company