Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act:

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No x

As of ~~January 2,~~March 25, 2014, ~~12,922,029~~12,856,249 shares of the registrant’s common stock were outstanding.


	Three months ended						Three months ended						Six months ended
	November 30,			November 30,			February 28,			February 28,			February 28,			February 28,
($ and shares in thousands, except per share amounts)	2013			2012			2014			2013			2014			2013
Operating revenues	$	147,671		$	147,370		$	152,804		$	175,539		$	300,475		$	322,909
Cost of operating revenues		107,520			104,513			110,132			125,175			217,652			229,688

Gross profit		40,151			42,857			42,672			50,364			82,823			93,221

Operating expenses:
Selling expense		9,756			7,321			9,534			8,000			19,290			15,321
General and administrative expense		11,743			10,118			9,354			10,155			21,097			20,273
Engineering and research expense		2,660			3,154			2,871			2,763			5,531			5,917

Total operating expenses		24,159			20,593			21,759			20,918			45,918			41,511

Operating income		15,992			22,264			20,913			29,446			36,905			51,710
Other income (expense):
Interest expense		(39	)		(143	)		(56	)		(83	)		(95	)		(226	)
Interest income		135			138			157			129			292			267
Other income (expense), net		(271	)		124			(225	)		(4	)		(496	)		120

Earnings before income taxes		15,817			22,383			20,789			29,488			36,606			51,871
Income tax expense		5,583			7,655			7,339			10,137			12,922			17,792

Net earnings	$	10,234		$	14,728		$	13,450		$	19,351		$	23,684		$	34,079

Earnings per share:
Basic	$	0.79		$	1.15		$	1.04		$	1.51		$	1.84		$	2.66
Diluted	$	0.79		$	1.15		$	1.04		$	1.50		$	1.83		$	2.65
Shares used in computing earnings per share:
Basic		12,889			12,756			12,910			12,842			12,899			12,799
Diluted		12,951			12,853			12,942			12,882			12,947			12,867
Cash dividends declared per share	$	0.130		$	0.115		$	0.260		$	0.115		$	0.390		$	0.230

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the condensed consolidated financial statements.


	Three months ended					Three months ended						Six months ended
	November 30,		November 30,			February 28,			February 28,			February 28,		February 28,
($ in thousands)	2013		2012			2014			2013			2014		2013
Net earnings	$	10,234	$	14,728		$	13,450		$	19,351		$	23,684	$	34,079

Other comprehensive income (loss):
Defined benefit pension plan adjustment, net of tax		28		33			28			33			56		66
Unrealized gain on cash flow hedges, net of tax		—		26			—			(35	)		—		(9	)
Foreign currency translation adjustment, net of hedging activities and tax		877		(41	)		(25	)		1,148			852		1,107

Total other comprehensive income, net of tax (benefit) of ($357) and ($393)		905		18
Total other comprehensive income, net of tax (benefit) expense of ($237), $275, ($595) and ($118)							3			1,146			908		1,164

Total comprehensive income	$	11,139	$	14,746		$	13,453		$	20,497		$	24,592	$	35,243

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the condensed consolidated financial statements.


	November 30,			November 30,			August 31,			February 28,			February 28,			August 31,
($ and shares in thousands, except par values)	2013			2012			2013			2014			2013			2013
ASSETS
Current Assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	151,803		$	152,173		$	151,927		$	165,509		$	159,583		$	151,927
Receivables, net of allowance of $3,349, $1,645 and $2,853		122,093			88,893			120,291
Receivables, net of allowance of $3,520, $1,915 and $2,853											111,211			105,399			120,291
Inventories, net		75,614			67,250			68,607			80,994			78,071			68,607
Deferred income taxes		13,469			8,171			12,705			13,916			9,110			12,705
Other current assets		15,989			10,719			15,261			18,216			15,020			15,261

Total current assets		378,968			327,206			368,791			389,846			367,183			368,791

Property, Plant and Equipment:
Cost		156,299			139,032			153,422			158,948			141,973			153,422
Less accumulated depreciation		(91,047	)		(82,947	)		(88,358	)		(93,502	)		(85,104	)		(88,358	)

Property, plant and equipment, net		65,252			56,085			65,064			65,446			56,869			65,064

Intangibles, net		35,029			24,410			36,007			34,084			23,729			36,007
Goodwill		37,193			30,114			37,414			37,282			30,211			37,414
Other noncurrent assets		5,261			5,063			5,020			3,961			4,490			5,020

Total assets	$	521,703		$	442,878		$	512,296		$	530,619		$	482,482		$	512,296

LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Current Liabilities:
Accounts payable	$	45,902		$	50,662		$	42,276		$	53,954		$	63,651		$	42,276
Current portion of long-term debt		—			3,214			—			—			2,143			—
Other current liabilities		57,132			39,141			59,816			54,204			45,724			59,816

Total current liabilities		103,034			93,017			102,092			108,158			111,518			102,092

Pension benefits liabilities		6,263			6,749			6,324			6,202			6,676			6,324
Deferred income taxes		14,715			9,622			15,415			13,975			9,716			15,415
Other noncurrent liabilities		8,022			7,417			7,827			7,590			7,415			7,827

Total liabilities		132,034			116,805			131,658			135,925			135,325			131,658

Shareholders’ Equity:
Preferred stock of $1 par value-
Authorized 2,000 shares; none issued		—			—			—
Authorized 2,000 shares; no shares issued											—			—			—
Common stock of $1 par value-
Authorized 25,000 shares; 18,620 issued		18,620			18,531			18,571
Authorized 25,000 shares; 18,633 issued											18,633			18,553			18,571
Capital in excess of stated value		49,288			44,995			49,764			50,794			47,036			49,764
Retained earnings		414,133			354,367			405,580			424,241			372,242			405,580
Less treasury stock (at cost, 5,698 shares)		(90,961	)		(90,961	)		(90,961	)
Accumulated other comprehensive loss, net		(1,411	)		(859	)		(2,316	)
Less treasury stock (at cost, 5,777 shares)											(97,566	)		(90,961	)		(90,961	)
Accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income, net											(1,408	)		287			(2,316	)

Total shareholders’ equity		389,669			326,073			380,638			394,694			347,157			380,638

Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity	$	521,703		$	442,878		$	512,296		$	530,619		$	482,482		$	512,296

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the condensed consolidated financial statements.


	Three months ended						Six months ended
	November 30,			November 30,			February 28,			February 28,
($ in thousands)	2013			2012			2014			2013
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net earnings	$	10,234		$	14,728		$	23,684		$	34,079
Adjustments to reconcile net earnings to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization		3,707			3,130			7,384			6,240
Provision for uncollectible accounts receivable		442			199			618			530
Deferred income taxes		(1,365	)		(782	)		(2,696	)		(2,104	)
Share-based compensation expense		1,180			1,219			2,191			2,351
Other, net		(244	)		157			250			144
Changes in assets and liabilities:
Receivables		(1,608	)		(6,441	)		9,010			(22,880	)
Inventories		(6,608	)		(14,341	)		(12,192	)		(24,827	)
Other current assets		(431	)		(357	)		(2,400	)		(4,222	)
Accounts payable		3,356			19,210			11,422			32,066
Other current liabilities		(5,986	)		(4,396	)		(5,410	)		5,331
Current taxes payable		3,140			1,312
Current income taxes payable								(168	)		(789	)
Other noncurrent assets and liabilities		111			(181	)		754			273

Net cash provided by operating activities		5,928			13,457			32,447			26,192

CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Purchases of property, plant and equipment		(2,387	)		(2,215	)		(5,353	)		(5,342	)
Proceeds from sale of property, plant and equipment		34			—			35			14
Proceeds from settlement of net investment hedges		101			—			280			—
Payments for settlement of net investment hedges		(1,035	)		(1,093	)		(1,846	)		(1,919	)

Net cash used in investing activities		(3,287	)		(3,308	)		(6,884	)		(7,247	)

CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Proceeds from exercise of stock options		—			1,082			371			1,619
Common stock withheld for payroll tax withholdings		(2,027	)		(2,441	)		(2,027	)		(2,441	)
Principal payments on long-term debt		—			(1,072	)		—			(2,142	)
Excess tax benefits from share-based compensation		465			2,185			695			2,629
Repurchase of common shares								(6,605	)		—
Dividends paid		(1,681	)		(1,476	)		(5,023	)		(2,952	)

Net cash used in financing activities		(3,243	)		(1,722	)		(12,589	)		(3,287	)

Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents		478			302			608			481

Net change in cash and cash equivalents		(124	)		8,729			13,582			16,139
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period		151,927			143,444			151,927			143,444

Cash and cash equivalents, end of period	$	151,803		$	152,173		$	165,509		$	159,583

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the condensed consolidated financial statements.

The condensed consolidated financial statements are presented in accordance with the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) and do not include all of the disclosures normally required by U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“U.S. GAAP”) as contained in Lindsay Corporation’s (the “Company”) Annual Report on Form 10-K. Accordingly, these condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in the Company’s most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended August 31, 2013.

In the opinion of management, the condensed consolidated financial statements of the Company reflect all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) necessary to present fairly the financial position and the results of operations and cash flows for the periods presented. The results for interim periods are not necessarily indicative of trends or results expected by the Company for a full year.

The condensed consolidated financial statements were prepared using U.S. GAAP. These principles require us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses. Actual results could differ from these estimates. Certain reclassifications have been made to prior financial statements and notes to conform to the current year presentation. These reclassifications were not material to the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements.

In December 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2011-11,Amendments to Disclosures about Offsetting Assets and Liabilities and in January 2013, the FASB issued ASU No. 2013-01,Clarifying the Scope of Disclosures about Offsetting Assets and Liabilities. The objective of ASU No. 2011-11 and ASU No. 2013-01 is to provide enhanced disclosures that will enable users of an entity’s financial statements to evaluate the effect or potential effect of netting arrangements on its financial position. Derivative instruments accounted for in accordance with Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 815, repurchase agreements, reverse repurchase agreements, securities borrowing, and securities lending transactions are subject to ASU No. 2011-11 disclosure requirements. ASU No. 2011-11 and ASU No. 2013-01 became effective for the Company beginning the first quarter of fiscal year 2014. The adoption of these standards did not have a material impact on the condensed consolidated financial statements.

In February 2013, the FASB issued ASU No. 2013-02,Reporting of Amounts Reclassified Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income.The objective of ASU No. 2013-02 is to improve the reporting of reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive income (“AOCI”). Entities are required to disclose changes in AOCI balances by component and significant items reclassified out of AOCI. ASU No. 2013-02 became effective for the Company beginning the first quarter of fiscal year 2014. The ~~reclassification disclosures were~~adoption of these standards did not ~~included in this Quarterly Report~~have a material impact on ~~Form 10-Q as~~ the ~~reclassifications out of AOCI were immaterial for the three months ended November 30, 2013 and 2012.~~condensed consolidated financial statements.

In March 2013, the FASB issued ASU No. 2013-05,Parent’s Accounting for the Cumulative Translation Adjustment upon Derecognition of Certain Subsidiaries or Groups of Assets within a Foreign Entity or of an Investment in a Foreign Entity. The objective of ASU No. 2013-05 is to clarify the applicable guidance for the release of the cumulative translation adjustment under U.S. GAAP. The effective date for ASU No. 2013-05 will be the first quarter of fiscal year 2015. The Company does not expect the adoption of this standard to impact its condensed consolidated financial statements.

The following table shows the computation of basic and diluted net earnings per share for the three and six months ended ~~November 30, 2013~~February 28, 2014 and ~~2012:~~2013:


	Three months ended				Three months ended				Six months ended
	November 30,		November 30,		February 28,		February 28,		February 28,		February 28,
($ and shares in thousands, except per share amounts)	2013		2012		2014		2013		2014		2013
Numerator:
Net earnings	$	10,234	$	14,728	$	13,450	$	19,351	$	23,684	$	34,079
Denominator:
Weighted average shares outstanding		12,889		12,756		12,910		12,842		12,899		12,799
Diluted effect of stock equivalents		62		97		32		40		48		68

Weighted average shares outstanding assuming dilution		12,951		12,853		12,942		12,882		12,947		12,867

Basic net earnings per share	$	0.79	$	1.15	$	1.04	$	1.51	$	1.84	$	2.66
Diluted net earnings per share	$	0.79	$	1.15	$	1.04	$	1.50	$	1.83	$	2.65

Certain stock options and restricted stock units are excluded from the computation of diluted net earnings per share because their effect is anti-dilutive. Performance stock units are excluded from the calculation of dilutive potential common shares until the threshold performance conditions have been satisfied. Items excluded from the calculation were not significant for the three and six months ended ~~November 30, 2013~~February 28, 2014 and ~~2012.~~2013.

It is the Company’s policy to report income tax expense for interim periods using an estimated annual effective income tax rate. However, the tax effects of significant or unusual items are not considered in the estimated annual effective income tax rate. The tax effects of such discrete events are recognized in the interim period in which the events occur. The Company recorded no material discrete items for the three and six months ended ~~November 30, 2013~~February 28, 2014 and ~~2012.~~2013.

The Company recorded income tax expense of ~~$5.6~~$7.3 million and ~~$7.7~~$12.9 million for the three and six months ended ~~November 30,~~February 28, respectively. The Company recorded income tax expense of $10.1 million and $17.8 million for the three and six months ended February 28, 2013, ~~and 2012,~~ respectively. The estimated annual effective income tax rate ~~used to calculate income tax expense before discrete items~~ was 35.3 percent and ~~34.2~~34.3 percent for the ~~three months~~year-to-date periods ended ~~November 30,~~February 28, 2014 and 2013, ~~and 2012,~~ respectively. The increase in the estimated annual effective income tax rate from ~~November 2012~~February 2013 to ~~November 2013~~February 2014 primarily relates to incremental increases in taxes due to the earnings mix among jurisdictions.

Inventories consisted of the following as of ~~November 30,~~February 28, 2014, February 28, 2013 ~~November 30, 2012~~ and August 31, 2013:


	November 30,			November 30,			August 31,			February 28,			February 28,			August 31,
($ in thousands)	2013			2012			2013			2014			2013			2013
Raw materials and supplies	$	20,386		$	14,447		$	19,369		$	19,614		$	19,102		$	19,369
Work in process		7,045			5,040			5,665			7,722			6,571			5,665
Finished goods and purchased parts		54,540			54,675			50,038			59,928			59,448			50,038

Total inventory value before LIFO adjustment		81,971			74,162			75,072			87,264			85,121			75,072
Less adjustment to LIFO value		(6,357	)		(6,912	)		(6,465	)		(6,270	)		(7,050	)		(6,465	)

Inventories, net	$	75,614		$	67,250		$	68,607		$	80,994		$	78,071		$	68,607

~~At November 30, 2013 and 2012 and August 31, 2013, the Company was in compliance with all loan covenants. There have been no changes made to credit arrangements since August 31, 2013.~~ The Company has no outstanding long-term debt and was in compliance with all loan covenants as of ~~November 30, 2013.~~

~~- 8 -~~The Company has an unsecured $30.0 million Revolving Credit Note and Credit Agreement with Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., which was amended on January 22, 2014 to revise letter of credit expiry dates and cash collateralization procedures (“the “Revolving Credit Agreement”). The borrowings from the Revolving Credit Agreement may primarily be used for working capital purposes and funding acquisitions. At February 28, 2014 and 2013 and August 31, 2013, the Company had no outstanding borrowings on the Revolving Credit Agreement. The amount of borrowings available at any time under the Revolving Credit Agreement is reduced by the amount of standby letters of credit then outstanding. At February 28, 2014, the Company had the ability to borrow $24.5 million under this facility, after consideration of standby letters of credit of $5.5 million. Borrowings under the Revolving Credit Agreement bear interest at a rate equal to LIBOR plus 90 basis points (1.06 percent as of February 28, 2014), subject to adjustment as set forth in the Revolving Credit Agreement. Interest is paid on a monthly to quarterly basis depending on loan type. The Company also pays an annual commitment fee of 0.25 percent on the unused portion of the Revolving Credit Agreement. Any unpaid principal and interest is due by February 13, 2016.

The Company’s wholly-owned European subsidiary, Lindsay Europe SAS, had an unsecured revolving line of credit with Societe Generale, a European commercial bank, under which it could borrow for working capital purposes up to 2.3 million Euros (the “Euro Line of Credit”). The Euro Line of Credit expired on January 31, 2014.

The Company uses certain financial derivatives to mitigate its exposure to volatility in interest rates and foreign currency exchange rates. The Company uses these derivative instruments to hedge exposures in the ordinary course of business and does not invest in derivative instruments for speculative purposes. The Company manages market and credit risks associated with its derivative instruments by establishing and monitoring limits as to the types and degree of risk that may be undertaken, and by entering into transactions with high-quality counterparties. As of ~~November 30, 2013,~~February 28, 2014, the Company’s derivative counterparty had investment grade credit ratings. Financial derivatives consist of the following:


	Fair Values of Derivative Instruments										Fair Values of Derivative Instruments
	Asset (Liability)										Asset (Liability)
		November 30,			November 30,			August 31,				February 28,			February 28,			August 31,
($ in thousands)	Balance Sheet Classification	2013			2012			2013			Balance Sheet Classification	2014			2013			2013
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments:
Foreign currency forward contracts	Other current assets	$	18		$	—		$	151		Other current assets	$	59		$	921		$	151
Foreign currency forward contracts	Other current liabilities		(287	)		(359	)		(258	)	Other current liabilities		(172	)		(234	)		(258	)
Interest rate swap	Other current liabilities		—			(45	)		—		Other current liabilities		—			(18	)		—

Total derivatives designated as hedging instruments		$	(269	)	$	(404	)	$	(107	)		$	(113	)	$	669		$	(107	)

Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments:
Foreign currency forward contracts	Other current assets	$	132		$	128		$	78		Other current assets	$	—		$	32		$	78
Foreign currency forward contracts	Other current liabilities		(1	)		—			(33	)	Other current liabilities		(106	)		(103	)		(33	)

Total derivatives not designated as hedging instruments		$	131		$	128		$	45			$	(106	)	$	(71	)	$	45

Accumulated other comprehensive income (“AOCI”) included realized and unrealized after-tax gains of ~~$1.4~~$1.1 million, ~~$1.7~~$1.8 million and $2.0 million at ~~November 30,~~February 28, 2014 and 2013 ~~and 2012~~ and August 31, 2013, respectively, related to derivative contracts designated as hedging instruments.

For the three months ended ~~November 30,~~February 28, 2014 and 2013, ~~and 2012,~~ the Company settled foreign currency forward contracts resulting in an after-tax net loss of ~~$0.6~~$0.4 million and ~~$0.7~~$0.5 million, which were included in OCI as part of a currency translation adjustment. For the six months ended February 28, 2014 and 2013, the Company settled foreign currency forward contracts resulting in an after-tax net loss of $0.9 million and $1.2 million, which were included in OCI as part of a currency translation adjustment.

There were no amounts recorded in the condensed consolidated statement of operations related to ineffectiveness of foreign currency forward contracts related to net investment hedges for the three and six months ended ~~November 30, 2013~~February 28, 2014 and ~~2012.~~2013. Accumulated currency translation adjustments from net investment hedges in AOCI at ~~November 30,~~February 28, 2014 and 2013 ~~and 2012~~ and August 31, 2013 reflected realized and unrealized after-tax gains of ~~$1.4~~$1.1 million, ~~$1.8~~$1.9 million and $2.0 million, respectively.

At ~~November 30,~~February 28, 2014 and 2013 ~~and 2012~~ and August 31, 2013, the Company had outstanding Euro foreign currency forward contracts to sell ~~29.1~~28.9 million Euro, ~~13.0~~29.5 million Euro and 29.2 million Euro, respectively, at fixed prices to settle during the next fiscal quarter. At ~~November 30,~~February 28, 2014 and 2013 and August 31, 2013, the Company had an outstanding South African Rand foreign currency forward contract to sell 43.0 million South African Rand at fixed prices to settle during the next fiscal quarter. The Company’s foreign currency forward contracts qualify as hedges of a net investment in foreign operations.

The following table presents the Company’s financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value based upon the level within the fair value hierarchy in which the fair value measurements fall, as of ~~November 30,~~February 28, 2014 and 2013 ~~and 2012~~ and August 31, 2013, respectively.


	November 30, 2013										February 28, 2014
($ in thousands)	Level 1		Level 2			Level 3		Total			Level 1		Level 2			Level 3		Total
Cash and cash equivalents	$	151,803	$	—		$	—	$	151,803		$	165,509	$	—		$	—	$	165,509
Derivative assets		—		150			—		150			—		59			—		59
Derivative liabilities		—		(288	)		—		(288	)		—		(278	)		—		(278	)

	November 30, 2012										February 28, 2013
($ in thousands)	Level 1		Level 2			Level 3		Total			Level 1		Level 2			Level 3		Total
Cash and cash equivalents	$	152,173	$	—		$	—	$	152,173		$	159,583	$	—		$	—	$	159,583
Derivative assets		—		128			—		128			—		953			—		953
Derivative liabilities		—		(404	)		—		(404	)		—		(355	)		—		(355	)

	August 31, 2013										August 31, 2013
($ in thousands)	Level 1		Level 2			Level 3		Total			Level 1		Level 2			Level 3		Total
Cash and cash equivalents	$	151,927	$	—		$	—	$	151,927		$	151,927	$	—		$	—	$	151,927
Derivative assets		—		229			—		229			—		229			—		229
Derivative liabilities		—		(291	)		—		(291	)		—		(291	)		—		(291	)

The carrying amount of long-term debt (including current portion), which represented fair value, was zero, ~~$3.2~~$2.1 million and zero as of ~~November 30,~~February 28, 2014 and 2013 ~~and 2012~~ and August 31, 2013, respectively. Fair value of long-term debt (including current portion) is estimated (using level 2 inputs) by discounting the future estimated cash flows of each instrument at current market interest rates for similar debt instruments of comparable maturities and credit quality.

The Company also measures the fair value of certain assets on a non-recurring basis, generally quarterly, annually, or when events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the assets may not be recoverable. These assets include fixed assets, goodwill, and other intangible assets. There were no required fair value adjustments for assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis for the three and six months ended ~~November 30, 2013~~February 28, 2014 and 2012. While the Company currently expects improvement in the infrastructure segment’s revenues and operating income, the increases involve certain matters that are outside of the Company’s control. To the extent that forecasted cash flows are not realized, the Company may be subject to further considerations of impairment exposures.2013.

In the ordinary course of its business operations, the Company is involved, from time to time, in commercial litigation, employment disputes, administrative proceedings and other legal proceedings. The Company has established accruals for certain proceedings based on an assessment of probability of loss. The Company believes that any potential loss in excess of the amounts accrued would not have a material effect on the business or its condensed consolidated financial statements. Such proceedings are exclusive of environmental remediation matters which are discussed separately below.

In 1992, the Company entered into a consent decree with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (the “EPA”) in which the Company committed to remediate environmental contamination of the groundwater that was discovered in 1982 through 1990 at and adjacent to its Lindsay, Nebraska facility (the “site”). The site was added to the EPA’s list of priority superfund sites in 1989. Between 1993 and 1995, remediation plans for the site were approved by the EPA and fully implemented by the Company. Since 1998, the primary remaining contamination at the site has been the presence of volatile organic chemicals in the soil and groundwater. To date, the remediation process has consisted primarily of drilling wells into the aquifer and pumping water to the surface to allow these contaminants to be removed by aeration.

In fiscal 2012, the Company undertook an investigation to assess further potential site remediation and containment actions. In connection with the receipt of preliminary results of this investigation and other evaluations, the Company estimated that it would incur $7.2 million in remediation of source area contamination and operating costs and accrued that undiscounted amount as an operating expense in the first quarter of fiscal 2012. The EPA has not approved the Company’s remediation plan.

In addition to the source area noted above, the Company has determined that volatile organic chemicals also exist under one of the manufacturing buildings on the site. Due to the location, the Company has not yet determined the extent of these chemicals or whether they are contributing, if at all, to groundwater contamination. Due to the current stage of discussions with the EPA and the uncertainty of the remediation actions that may be required with respect to this affected area, the Company believes that meaningful estimates of costs or range of costs cannot currently be made and accordingly have not been accrued.

In fiscal 2013, the Company and the EPA conducted a periodic five-year review of the status of the remediation of the contamination site. This review resulted in no findings that affected the Company’s environmental liability accrual. The ~~Company intends~~EPA has agreed with the Company’s plan to complete ~~additional~~ investigation of the soil and groundwater on the site, including the area under the building, during fiscal 2014 ~~with the expectation~~and early 2015. The Company expects that ~~the Company~~once this additional testing is complete, it will ~~then~~ come to an agreement with the EPA on how to proceed. During the first ~~three~~six months of fiscal 2014, the Company did not accrue any additional incremental costs related to environmental remediation liabilities.

The Company accrues the anticipated cost of investigation and remediation when the obligation is probable and can be reasonably estimated. Although the Company has accrued all reasonably estimable costs associated with the site, it anticipates there could be revisions to the current remediation plan as ~~a result of these activities and~~well as additional ~~information is obtained.~~testing and environmental monitoring as part of the Company’s ongoing discussions with the EPA regarding the development and implementation of the remedial action plans. Any revisions could be material to the operating results of any fiscal quarter or fiscal year. The Company does not expect such additional expenses would have a material adverse effect on its liquidity or financial condition.

The Company accrues the anticipated cost of investigation and remediation when the obligation is probable and can be reasonably estimated. Although the Company has accrued all reasonably estimable costs associated with remediation of the site, it is expected that additional testing and environmental monitoring and remediation could be required in the future as part of the Company’s ongoing discussions with the EPA regarding the development and implementation of the remedial action plans. In addition, the current investigation has not yet been completed and does not include all potentially affected areas on the site. Due to the current stage of discussions with the EPA and the uncertainty of the remediation actions that may be required with respect to these affected areas, the Company believes that meaningful estimates of costs or range of costs cannot currently be made and accordingly have not been accrued.

~~The~~ following table summarizes the undiscounted environmental remediation liability classifications included in the balance sheet as of ~~November 30,~~February 28, 2014 and 2013 ~~and 2012~~ and August 31, 2013:


Environmental Remediation Liabilities	Environmental Remediation Liabilities							Environmental Remediation Liabilities
($ in thousands) Balance Sheet Classification		November 30, 2013		November 30, 2012		August 31, 2013
($ in thousands)									February 28,		February 28,		August 31,
Balance Sheet Classification									2014		2013		2013
Other current liabilities		$	1,516	$	2,391	$	1,740		$	1,346	$	2,244	$	1,740
Other noncurrent liabilities			5,200		5,200		5,200			5,200		5,200		5,200

Total environmental remediation liabilities		$	6,716	$	7,591	$	6,940		$	6,546	$	7,444	$	6,940


	Three months ended						Three months ended
	November 30,			November 30,			February 28,			February 28,
($ in thousands)	2013			2012			2014			2013
Warranties:
Product warranty accrual balance, beginning of period	$	6,695		$	4,848		$	8,622		$	5,052
Liabilities accrued for warranties during the period		3,042			1,292			703			1,234
Warranty claims paid during the period		(1,115	)		(1,088	)		(908	)		(714	)

Product warranty accrual balance, end of period	$	8,622		$	5,052		$	8,417		$	5,572


							Six months ended
($ in thousands)							February 28, 2014			February 28, 2013
Product warranty accrual balance, beginning of period							$	6,695		$	4,848
Liabilities accrued for warranties during the period								3,745			2,526
Warranty claims paid during the period								(2,023	)		(1,802	)

Product warranty accrual balance, end of period							$	8,417		$	5,572

The Company’s current share-based compensation plans, approved by the stockholders of the Company, provides for awards of stock options, restricted shares, restricted stock units (“RSUs”), stock appreciation rights, performance shares and performance stock units (“PSUs”) to employees and non-employee directors of the Company. The Company measures and recognizes compensation expense for all share-based payment awards made to employees and directors based on estimated fair values. Share-based compensation expense was $1.0 million and $1.2 million for ~~each of~~ the three months ended ~~November 30,~~February 28, 2014 and 2013, respectively. Share-based compensation expense was $2.2 million and ~~2012.~~$2.4 million for the six months ended February 28, 2014 and 2013, respectively.

~~The following table illustrates~~During the ~~type and~~second quarter of fiscal 2014, the Company awarded its annual grant of RSUs to independent members of the Board of Directors at a grant date fair value of $83.17 per share, which resulted in a total of 5,831 RSUs being granted. These RSUs are scheduled to become fully vested on November 1, 2014 and were issued from the ~~share-based compensation awards granted during the three month periods ended November 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively:~~Company’s 2010 Long-Term Incentive Plan.

The RSUs granted in 2013 and 2012 consisted of 2,977 and 2,057, respectively, of awards that will be settled in cash. The weighted average stock price on the date of grant was $76.39 and $75.68 for 2013 and 2012, respectively.

~~The following table provides the assumptions used in determining the fair value of the option awards for the three month periods ended November 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively:~~

Irrigation—This reporting segment includes the manufacture and marketing of center pivot, lateral move, and hose reel irrigation systems as well as various water pumping stations, controls, and filtration solutions. The irrigation reporting segment consists of thirteen operating segments that have similar economic characteristics and meet the aggregation criteria, including similar products, production processes, type or class of customer and methods for distribution.

Infrastructure—This reporting segment includes the manufacture and marketing of Road Zipper Systems^TM, moveable barriers, specialty barriers and crash cushions; providing outsource manufacturing services and the manufacturing and selling of large diameter steel tubing and railroad signals and structures. The infrastructure reporting segment consists of two operating segments that have similar economic characteristics and meet the aggregation criteria, including similar products, production processes, type or class of customer and methods for distribution.

The Company evaluates the performance of its reportable segments based on segment sales, gross profit, and operating income, with operating income for segment purposes excluding unallocated corporate general and administrative expenses, interest income, interest expense, other income and expenses, and income taxes. Operating income for segment purposes does include general and administrative expenses, selling expenses, engineering and research expenses, environmental remediation expenses and other overhead charges directly attributable to the segment.

The Company had no single major customer who represented 10 percent or more of its total revenues during the three and six months ended ~~November 30, 2013~~February 28, 2014 and ~~2012.~~2013.

Summarized financial information concerning the Company’s reportable segments is shown in the following tables:


	Three months ended						Three months ended						Six months ended
	November 30,			November 30,			February 28,			February 28,			February 28,			February 28,
($ in thousands)	2013			2012			2014			2013			2014			2013
Operating revenues:
Irrigation	$	129,183		$	134,217		$	135,884		$	162,677		$	265,067		$	296,894
Infrastructure		18,488			13,153			16,920			12,862			35,408			26,015

Total operating revenues	$	147,671		$	147,370		$	152,804		$	175,539		$	300,475		$	322,909

Operating income (loss):
Irrigation	$	20,311		$	27,468		$	24,548		$	35,267		$	44,859		$	62,735
Infrastructure		508			(1,318	)		6			(2,066	)		514			(3,384	)

Segment operating income		20,819			26,150			24,554			33,201			45,373			59,351
Unallocated general and administrative expenses		(4,827	)		(3,886	)		(3,641	)		(3,755	)		(8,468	)		(7,641	)
Interest and other income (expense), net		(175	)		119			(124	)		42			(299	)		161

Earnings before income taxes	$	15,817		$	22,383		$	20,789		$	29,488		$	36,606		$	51,871

Capital Expenditures:
Irrigation	$	2,228		$	2,085		$	2,709		$	2,965		$	4,937		$	5,051
Infrastructure		159			130			257			162			416			291

	$	2,387		$	2,215		$	2,966		$	3,127		$	5,353		$	5,342

Depreciation and Amortization:
Irrigation	$	2,358		$	1,704		$	2,341		$	1,692		$	4,699		$	3,396
Infrastructure		1,349			1,426			1,336			1,418			2,685			2,844

	$	3,707		$	3,130		$	3,677		$	3,110		$	7,384		$	6,240


	November 30,		November 30,		August 31,
($ in thousands)	2013		2012		2013		February 28, 2014		February 28, 2013		August 31, 2013
Total Assets:
Irrigation	$	395,981	$	331,872	$	391,527	$	404,828	$	371,755	$	391,527
Infrastructure		125,722		111,006		120,769		125,791		110,727		120,769

	$	521,703	$	442,878	$	512,296	$	530,619	$	482,482	$	512,296


	November 30,		November 30,		August 31,		February 28,		February 28,		August 31,
($ in thousands)	2013		2012		2013		2014		2013		2013
Other current liabilities:
Compensation and benefits	$	11,962	$	10,772	$	18,471	$	13,299	$	13,790	$	18,471
Warranties		8,622		5,052		6,695		8,417		5,572		6,695
Dealer related liabilities		6,588		3,405		7,134
Income tax liabilities		6,367		4,129		3,550
Dealer liabilities								6,749		4,313		7,134
Deferred revenues		5,677		2,555		4,790		6,525		2,540		4,790
Customer deposits								5,611		6,248		4,580
Other		17,916		13,228		19,176		13,603		13,261		18,146

Total other current liabilities	$	57,132	$	39,141	$	59,816	$	54,204	$	45,724	$	59,816

On January 3, 2014, the Company announced that its Board of Directors replaced its existing share repurchase authorization with an increased authorization to repurchase up to $150.0 million of common stock with an authorization effective through January 2, 2016. During the three and six months ended February 28, 2014, the Company repurchased 78,520 shares of common stock for an aggregate purchase price of $6.6 million. During the three and six months ended February 28, 2013, the Company did not repurchase shares of common stock. The remaining amount available under the repurchase program was $143.4 million as of February 28, 2014.

~~The Company pursues primarily synergistic water related acquisitions that provide attractive returns to shareholders. The Company accounts for business combinations in accordance with ASC 805 –~~~~Business Combinations,~~which requires the recognition of the identifiable assets acquired, liabilities assumed, goodwill, and any noncontrolling interest in the acquiree. In addition, the Company expenses all acquisition-related costs in the period in which the costs are incurred and the services received.

~~On August 16, 2013, the Company acquired 100 percent of the outstanding common shares of Claude Laval Corporation (“CLC”), a California corporation that manufactures and distributes LAKOS~~^® separators and filtration solutions for groundwater, agriculture, industrial and heat transfer markets, worldwide. Total consideration paid was $29.0 million which was financed with cash on hand. The allocation of purchase price for CLC was finalized in the first quarter of fiscal 2014. The allocation of purchase price for CLC below changed from the allocation of purchase price disclosed in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the Company’s fiscal year ended August 31, 2013 because the closing balance sheet under the terms of the purchase agreement and the valuation of the identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed was finalized in November 2013. The Company determined the changes to be immaterial.

~~The following table summarizes the consideration paid for CLC and the amounts of fair value of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the acquisition date.~~

The acquired intangible assets include amortizable intangible assets of $7.1 million and indefinite-lived intangible assets of $6.5 million related to tradenames. The amortizable intangible assets have a weighted-average useful life of approximately 8 years. The following table summarizes the identifiable intangible assets at fair value.

Goodwill related to the acquisition of CLC primarily relates to intangible assets that do not qualify for separate recognition, including the experience and knowledge of CLC management, its assembled workforce, and its intellectual capital and specialization within the filtration solutions industry. Goodwill recorded in connection with this acquisition is non-deductible for income tax purposes. Pro forma information related to this acquisition was not included because the impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements was not considered to be material.

ITEM 2- – Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains not only historical information, but also forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Statements that are not historical are forward-looking and reflect expectations for future Company conditions or performance. In addition, forward-looking statements may be made orally or in press releases, conferences, reports, on the Company’s worldwide web site, or otherwise, in the future by or on behalf of the Company. When used by or on behalf of the Company, the words “expect,” “anticipate,” “estimate,” “believe,” “intend,” “will,” “plan,” “project,” and similar expressions generally identify forward-looking statements. The entire section entitled “Market Conditions and Outlook” should be considered forward-looking statements. For these statements, the Company claims the protection of the safe harbor for forward-looking statements contained in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995.

Forward-looking statements involve a number of risks and uncertainties, including but not limited to those discussed in the “Risk Factors” section in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended August 31, 2013. Readers should not place undue reliance on any forward-looking statement and should recognize that the statements are predictions of future results or conditions, which may not occur as anticipated. Actual results or conditions could differ materially from those anticipated in the forward-looking statements and from historical results, due to the risks and uncertainties described herein and in the Company’s other public filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, including the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the Company’s fiscal year ended August 31, 2013, as well as other risks and uncertainties not now anticipated. The risks and uncertainties described herein and in the Company’s other public filings are not exclusive and further information concerning the Company and its businesses, including factors that potentially could materially affect the Company’s financial results, may emerge from time to time. Except as required by law, the Company assumes no obligation to update forward-looking statements to reflect actual results or changes in factors or assumptions affecting such forward-looking statements.

In preparing the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP, management must make a variety of decisions which impact the reported amounts and the related disclosures. These decisions include the selection of the appropriate accounting principles to be applied and the assumptions on which to base accounting estimates. In making these decisions, management applies its judgment based on its understanding and analysis of the relevant circumstances and the Company’s historical experience.

The Company’s accounting policies that are most important to the presentation of its results of operations and financial condition, and which require the greatest use of judgments and estimates by management, are designated as its critical accounting policies. See discussion of the Company’s critical accounting policies under Item 7 in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the Company’s fiscal year ended August 31, 2013. Management periodically re-evaluates and adjusts its critical accounting policies as circumstances change. There were no changes in the Company’s critical accounting policies during the three and six months ended ~~November 30, 2013.~~February 28, 2014.

See Note 2 – New Accounting Pronouncements to the condensed consolidated financial statements set forth in Part I, Item 1 of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

~~Operating revenues~~Net earnings for the three months ended ~~November 30, 2013~~February 28, 2014 were ~~$147.7~~$13.5 million ~~versus~~or $1.04 per diluted share compared with $19.4 million or $1.50 per diluted share in the ~~$147.4 million of~~prior year. The decrease in earnings was primarily attributable to a 13 percent decline in operating revenues ~~for the three months ended November 30, 2012. Total irrigation equipment revenues decreased 4 percent~~ to ~~$129.2~~$152.8 million from ~~$134.2~~$175.5 million in the prior ~~fiscal year’s first quarter.~~year period. Gross margin declined to 27.9 percent of sales from 28.7 percent in the prior year due to a shift in sales mix and deleverage of fixed costs on lower sales. In addition, operating expenses increased by $0.8 million, including an incremental $2.2 million of expenses associated with the newly acquired LAKOS^® business. Excluding the LAKOS^® acquisition, operating expenses declined $1.4 million.

The primary driver to consolidated results in the quarter was the irrigation segment, where sales decreased by 16 percent to $135.9 million from $162.7 million in the prior year and operating margins declined to 18.1 percent of sales from 21.7 percent last year. The lower sales were primarily attributable to a $23.4 million sales decline in U.S. irrigation ~~revenues decreased and were partially offset by increased demand in international~~ markets ~~and the addition~~as a result of ~~Claude Laval Corporation (“CLC”). U.S. irrigation revenues of $79.3 million decreased 18 percent primarily due to significantly~~ lower ~~agricultural commodity~~crop prices and a ~~reduction~~decreasing impact of drought conditions in the ~~drought driven sales increases that occurred~~U.S. Corn Belt, while the lower operating margins are due to the deleveraging of fixed expenses on lower revenue.

Infrastructure segment results improved in the ~~Corn Belt last year, while international irrigation~~quarter as revenues ~~of $49.9 million~~ increased 32 percent ~~led by growth~~to $16.9 million and operating profit improved to break-even as compared to an operating loss of $2.1 million in ~~South America~~the prior year. Sales and ~~Australia. Infrastructure revenues increased 41 percent to $18.5 million with increases in nearly all of the Company’s infrastructure product lines.~~

Net earnings were $10.2 million or $0.79 per diluted share for the three months ended November 30, 2013 compared with $14.7 million or $1.15 per diluted share for the same prior year period. Lower profits on similar revenues resulted primarily from lower gross marginsprofit improvements are due to a ~~$2.3 million charge related~~more aggressive approach to asales growth in the infrastructure product ~~warranty matter~~lines while improving gross margins and ~~higher operating expenses associated with incremental expenses~~reducing SG&A expenses.

During the second quarter, the Company began to execute the capital allocation plan that it had announced in January 2014, doubling its quarterly cash dividend to $0.26 per common share and repurchasing 78,520 shares of ~~CLC and higher personnel expenses.~~common stock for $6.6 million.

The Company’s irrigation revenues are highly dependent upon the need for irrigated agricultural crop production, which, in turn, depends upon many factors, including the primary drivers of agricultural commodity prices, net farm income, weather conditions and governmental policies regarding the agricultural sector. The degree to which each of these factors impact ~~customer’s~~the irrigation equipment purchase decisions of the Company’s customers is difficult to predict.

Farm commodity prices have declined during the past year on indications of strong yields and a decreasing impact of drought conditions in the U.S. Corn Belt. ~~Corn~~As of February 2014, corn prices have decreased 4335 percent and soybeans have decreased 103 percent compared to the same time last year. As of February 2014, the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) estimated U.S. 2014 net farm income to be $95.8 billion, down 27 percent from USDA’s estimate of U.S. 2013 net farm income of $130.5 billion. The U.S. 2014 net farm income forecast would be the lowest since 2010, but would remain 9% above the 10-year average.

A number of recent and potential regulatory ~~environment remains uncertain although certain~~actions could further impact the Company’s business.

At this point, the Company anticipates ~~significantly~~ lower ~~U.S.~~ irrigation segment revenues for the remainder of fiscal 2014 primarily due to the significant decrease in ~~relevant~~ agricultural commodity prices. The U.S. irrigation market has slowed significantly as compared to the past several years of record crop prices and the ~~decrease of certain tax incentives, although strong farmer balance sheets and net farm income could mitigate~~significant drought. The potential for an increase in international irrigation revenues will be challenging for the ~~negative impacts. The Company does not expect to have more visibility into the primary selling season~~remainder of fiscal 2014 ~~until later~~since prior year irrigation revenues included $33.4 million from the equipment purchases in ~~the second fiscal quarter.~~Iraq. The current political environment regarding Russia and Ukraine may further limit international irrigation equipment growth.

While the Company anticipates a decline from peak irrigation revenues ~~for~~during the near-term, drivers for the Company’s markets of population growth, expanded food production and efficient water use, support the Company’s expectation for long-term growth. The Company believes the most significant opportunities for growth over the next several years are in international markets, where irrigation use is significantly less developed and demand is driven primarily by food security, water scarcity and population growth. The Company’s capital expenditure plan includes investments in a manufacturing operation in Turkey, which is planned to be operational early in fiscal 2015 and should accommodate long-term growth plans for several international markets.

Infrastructure demand ~~including for Road Zipper System~~^TM ~~projects,~~ has ~~proven~~increased in recent quarters as the Company has aggressively pursued market expansion. However, the infrastructure business remains dependent on government spending on highway and other infrastructure projects. In addition, the current U.S. highway bill is scheduled to ~~be challenging due to constricted government funding and project delays. The~~expire in the fall of 2014. While the infrastructure segment continues to experience revenue and profit volatility due to the project nature of the Road Zipper Systems^TM and the fixed nature of some operating ~~expenses. The Company believes the Road Zipper Systems~~^TM ~~has an opportunity to drive profitability over the long term as a superior solution to worldwide traffic congestion, lost productivity and energy waste.~~

~~For the infrastructure business, government spending on highway and other infrastructure projects remains an impediment to achieving consistent market growth, although~~expenses, the Company believes it has sizeable market penetration opportunities for road safety products and Road Zipper Systems^TM~~, worldwide, and has seen some positive signs of increased infrastructure activity.~~ worldwide. Demand for the Company’s transportation safety products continues to be driven by population growth and the need for improved road safety.

As of ~~November 30, 2013,~~February 28, 2014, the Company had an order backlog of ~~$86.6~~$89.3 million compared with ~~$85.1~~$159.3 million at ~~November 30, 2012~~February 28, 2013 and $66.5 million at August 31, 2013. ~~Current year~~Order backlog at February 28, 2014 declined from the same time in 2013 in U.S. ~~irrigation markets~~ and ~~was offset by an increase in backlog in~~ international irrigation markets, and ininfrastructure segment backlog increased over the ~~infrastructure segment.~~same time last year. The ~~increase in~~current year infrastructure backlog ~~included~~includes a ~~$12.7~~$12.8 million Road Zipper System^TM order ~~from~~for the Golden Gate Bridge ~~Highway & Transportation District.~~which will be recognized in revenue in fiscal 2015. The prior year irrigation backlog included a $39.1 million equipment and installation contract in Iraq, of which $3.0 million remained in backlog at February 28, 2014. The Company’s backlog can fluctuate from period to period due to the seasonality, cyclicality, timing and execution of contracts. Typically, the Company’s backlog at any point in time represents only a portion of the revenue it expects to realize during the following three-month period. However, the timing related to certain project oriented contracts may extend longer than three months.

For the business overall, the global, long-term drivers of water conservation, population growth, increasing importance of biofuels, and the need for safer, more efficient transportation solutions remain positive. The Company is ~~pursuing a variety of actions~~committed to ~~achieve long-term earnings growth and~~increasing shareholder ~~value:~~

For the Three Months ended ~~November 30, 2013~~February 28, 2014 compared to the Three Months ended ~~November 30, 2012~~February 28, 2013

The following section presents an analysis of the Company’s operating results displayed in the condensed consolidated statements of operations for the three months ended ~~November 30, 2013~~February 28, 2014 and ~~2012.~~2013. It should be read together with the industry segment information in Note 12 to the condensed consolidated financial statements:


	Three months ended						Percent			Three months ended						Percent
	November 30,			November 30,			Increase			February 28,			February 28,			Increase
($ in thousands)	2013			2012			(Decrease)			2014			2013			(Decrease)
Consolidated
Operating revenues	$	147,671		$	147,370			0	%	$	152,804		$	175,539			(13	%)
Gross profit	$	40,151		$	42,857			(6	%)	$	42,672		$	50,364			(15	%)
Gross margin		27.2	%		29.1	%					27.9	%		28.7	%
Operating expenses⁽¹⁾	$	24,159		$	20,593			17	%	$	21,759		$	20,918			4	%
Operating income	$	15,992		$	22,264			(28	%)	$	20,913		$	29,446			(29	%)
Operating margin		10.8	%		15.1	%					13.7	%		16.8	%
Other income (expense), net	$	(175	)	$	119			(247	%)
Other (expense) income, net										$	(124	)	$	42			(395	%)
Income tax expense	$	5,583		$	7,655			(27	%)	$	7,339		$	10,137			(28	%)
Effective income tax rate		35.3	%		34.2	%					35.3	%		34.4	%
Net earnings	$	10,234		$	14,728			(31	%)	$	13,450		$	19,351			(30	%)
Irrigation Equipment Segment
Segment operating revenues	$	129,183		$	134,217			(4	%)	$	135,884		$	162,677			(16	%)
Segment operating income⁽²⁾	$	20,311		$	27,468			(26	%)	$	24,548		$	35,267			(30	%)
Segment operating margin⁽²⁾		15.7	%		20.5	%					18.1	%		21.7	%
Infrastructure Products Segment
Segment operating revenues	$	18,488		$	13,153			41	%	$	16,920		$	12,862			32	%
Segment operating income⁽²⁾	$	508		$	(1,318	)		139	%
Segment operating income (loss)⁽²⁾										$	6		$	(2,066	)		100	%
Segment operating margin⁽²⁾		2.7	%		(10.0	%)					0.0	%		(16.1	%)

Operating revenues for the three months ended ~~November 30, 2013 were $147.7~~February 28, 2014 declined 13 percent to $152.8 million ~~versus the $147.4~~from $175.5 million ~~of operating revenues~~ for the three months ended ~~November 30, 2012~~February 28, 2013 as ~~infrastructure~~irrigation revenues ~~increased by $5.3~~decreased $26.8 million partially offset by ~~a $5.0~~the $4.1 million ~~decrease in irrigation~~increase of infrastructure revenues. The irrigation segment provided 8789 percent of ~~Company~~the Company’s revenue for the three months ended ~~November 30, 2013~~February 28, 2014 as compared to 9193 percent of the same prior year period. Total Company revenues remained at record levels in the first fiscal quarter while U.S. irrigation market sales declined as expected, on significantly lower agricultural commodity prices. Meanwhile, the infrastructure segment made significant progress with sales increases in nearly all product lines.

U.S. irrigation revenues for the three months ended ~~November 30, 2013~~February 28, 2014 of ~~$79.3~~$92.8 million decreased 1821 percent compared to the three months ended ~~November 30, 2012.~~February 28, 2013. The decrease in U.S. irrigation revenues is primarily due to a 3135 percent decrease in the number of irrigation systems sold and a 10 percent decrease in irrigation parts volume compared to the second fiscal quarter of the prior year, with the largest decreases in the Corn Belt where ~~sales were bolstered~~the drought conditions in 2012 led to high demand in fiscal ~~2013 by drought conditions.~~2013. Lower commodity prices, with corn decreasing 4335 percent and soybeans decreasing 103 percent over the same period last year, contributed to lower demand for U.S. irrigation equipment. The revenues generated from the newly acquired LAKOS^® business in August 2013 partially offset the volume decreases in ~~pivot volume were partially offset by sales of Lakos water filtration~~irrigation systems ~~sold through Claude Laval Corporation, which was acquired during the end of fiscal 2013.~~and parts.

International irrigation revenues for the three months ended ~~November 30, 2013~~February 28, 2014 of ~~$49.9~~$43.1 million ~~increased 32~~decreased 5 percent from ~~$37.7~~$45.5 million in the three months ended ~~November 30, 2012.~~February 28, 2013. The ~~increase~~decrease in international irrigation revenues is primarily due to volume ~~increases~~decreases in the number of irrigation systems ~~irrigation parts, and pump stations~~ sold compared to the prior year. ~~The international irrigation revenues also increased from incremental export sales of Lakos water filtration systems sold through Claude Laval Corporation.~~ Operating revenues ~~increased~~decreased most significantly in ~~South America~~the Middle East and ~~Australia.~~Russia/Ukraine partially offset by increases in Australia, Africa, and water filtration system sales from the newly acquired LAKOS^® business.

Infrastructure segment revenues were ~~$18.5~~$16.9 million for the three months ended ~~November 30, 2013~~February 28, 2014 increasing 4132 percent from ~~$13.2~~$12.9 million for the three months ended ~~November 30, 2012~~February 28, 2013 primarily due to sales increases across all product lines and most significantly in road safety products and railroad signals and ~~structures, and Road Zipper Systems~~^TM. Although the Company experienced sales increases over the prior year, infrastructure sales continue to be constrained by the uncertainty of longer-term plans for highway projects and government fundingstructures.

Gross profit for the three months ended ~~November 30, 2013~~February 28, 2014 of ~~$40.2~~$42.7 million decreased ~~6 percent compared to $42.9~~from $50.4 million for three months ended ~~November 30, 2012.~~February 28, 2013. The decrease in gross profit was primarily ~~attributable~~due to the decline in sales and a decrease in gross margin ~~generated by the irrigation segment. Gross margin was 27.2~~to 27.9 percent for the three months ended ~~November 30, 2013 compared to 29.1~~February 28, 2014 from 28.7 percent for the three months ended ~~November 30, 2012.~~February 28, 2013. Gross margins in irrigation declined by approximately ~~two~~one percentage ~~points as core U.S. margins improved but were offset by a $2.3 million charge related~~point due to ~~a product warranty matter~~fixed cost deleverage on lower sales and a higher percentage of sales being made in international markets that typically have lower margins than U.S. sales. Infrastructure gross margins improved by approximately ~~five~~seven percentage points primarily due to a combination of mix shift to higher ~~percentage of~~margin products and fixed cost leverage on higher sales ~~being attributed to high margin sales of Road Zipper Systems~~^TM.volume.

The Company’s operating expenses of ~~$24.2~~$21.8 million for the three months ended ~~November 30, 2013~~February 28, 2014 increased by ~~$3.6~~$0.8 million over operating expenses incurred during the three months ended ~~November 30, 2012.~~February 28, 2013. The ~~acquisition of Claude Laval Corporation~~newly acquired LAKOS^® business in August 2013 ~~resulted in a $2.1 million increase in~~increased operating expenses ~~for~~by $2.2 million. Excluding the ~~period. In addition, the Company incurred approximately $1.2~~LAKOS^® acquisition, operating expenses declined $1.4 million primarily due to reductions of ~~higher personnel~~$0.9 million in incentive compensation and $0.5 million in advertising expenses. Operating expenses were ~~16.4~~14.2 percent of sales for the three months ended ~~November 30, 2013~~February 28, 2014 compared to ~~14.0~~11.9 percent of sales for the three months ended ~~November 30, 2012.~~February 28, 2013.

~~Operating~~The combination of lower gross margins and higher operating expenses resulted in a reduction in operating margin ~~was 10.8~~for the three months ended February 28, 2014 to 13.7 percent as compared to 16.8 percent for the three months ended ~~November 30, 2013 as compared to 15.1 percent for the three months ended November 30, 2012.~~February 28, 2013.

The Company recorded income tax expense of ~~$5.6~~$7.3 million and ~~$7.7~~$10.1 million for the three months ended ~~November 30,~~February 28, 2014 and 2013, ~~and 2012,~~ respectively. The estimated annual effective income tax rate ~~used to calculate income tax expense~~ was 35.3 percent and ~~34.2~~34.4 percent for the three months ended ~~November 30,~~February 28, 2014 and 2013, respectively. The increase in the estimated annual effective income tax rate primarily relates to an incremental increase in taxes due to the earnings mix among jurisdictions.

For the Six Months ended February 28, 2014 compared to the Six Months ended February 28, 2013

The following section presents an analysis of the Company’s operating results displayed in the condensed consolidated statements of operations for the six months ended February 28, 2014 and 2013. It should be read together with the industry segment information in Note 12 to the condensed consolidated financial statements:

Operating revenues for the six months ended February 28, 2014 decreased 7 percent to $300.5 million from $322.9 million for the six months ended February 28, 2013. The decrease is attributable to a $31.8 million decrease in irrigation revenues offset in part by a $9.4 million increase in infrastructure revenues. The irrigation segment provided 88 percent of Company revenue for the six months ended February 28, 2014 as compared to 92 percent of the same prior year period.

U.S. irrigation revenues for the six months ended February 28, 2014 of $172.6 million decreased 19 percent compared to the six months ended February 28, 2013. The decrease in U.S. irrigation revenues is primarily due to a 33 percent decrease in the number of irrigation systems sold and an 11 percent decrease in irrigation parts volume compared to the first half of the prior year, with the largest decreases in the Corn Belt where the drought conditions in 2012 led to high demand in fiscal 2013. Lower agricultural commodity prices contributed to lower demand for U.S. irrigation equipment. The revenues generated from the newly acquired LAKOS^® business in August 2013 partially offset the volume decreases in irrigation systems and parts.

International irrigation revenues for the six months ended February 28, 2014 of $92.4 million increased 11 percent from $83.3 million in the six months ended February 28, 2013. The increase in international irrigation revenues is primarily due to volume increases in the number of irrigation systems sold and water filtration system sales from the newly acquired LAKOS^® business. Operating revenues increased most significantly in Australia and South America partially offset by decreases in the Middle East.

Infrastructure segment revenues were $35.4 million for the six months ended February 28, 2014 increasing 36 percent from $26.0 million for the six months ended February 28, 2013 primarily due to sales increases in nearly all product lines and most significantly in road safety products and railroad signals and structures.

Gross profit for the six months ended February 28, 2014 of $82.8 million decreased from $93.2 million for the six months ended February 28, 2013. The decrease in gross profit was primarily due to the decline in sales and a decrease in gross margin to 27.6 percent for the six months ended February 28, 2014 compared from 28.9 percent for the six months ended February 28, 2013. Gross margins in irrigation declined by approximately two percentage points due to a $2.3 million charge related to a product warranty matter, fixed cost deleverage on lower volume, and a higher percentage of irrigation sales being made in international markets that typically have lower margins than U.S. sales. Infrastructure gross margins improved by approximately six percentage points primarily due to a combination of mix shift to higher margin products and fixed cost leverage on higher sales volume.

The Company’s operating expenses of $45.9 million for the six months ended February 28, 2014 increased by $4.4 million over operating expenses incurred during the six months ended February 28, 2013. The newly acquired LAKOS^® business in August 2013 increased operating expenses by $4.3 million. Operating expenses were 15.3 percent of sales for the six months ended February 28, 2014 compared to 12.9 percent of sales for the six months ended February 28, 2013.

The combination of lower gross margins and higher operating expenses resulted in a reduction in operating margin for the six months ended February 28, 2014 to 12.3 percent as compared to 16.0 percent for the six months ended February 28, 2013.

The Company recorded income tax expense of $12.9 million and $17.8 million for the six months ended February 28, 2014 and 2013, respectively. The estimated annual effective income tax rate was 35.3 percent and 34.3 percent for the six months ended February 28, 2014 and 2013, respectively. The increase in the estimated annual effective income tax rate from ~~November 2012~~February 2013 to ~~November 2013~~February 2014 primarily relates to an incremental increase in taxes due to the earnings mix among jurisdictions.

The Company’s cash and cash equivalents totaled ~~$151.8~~$165.5 million at ~~November 30, 2013~~February 28, 2014 compared with ~~$152.2~~$159.6 million at ~~November 30, 2012~~February 28, 2013 and $151.9 million at August 31, 2013. The Company requires cash for financing its receivables and inventories, paying operating expenses and capital expenditures, and for dividends and share repurchases. The Company meets its liquidity needs and finances its capital expenditures from its available cash and funds provided by operations along with borrowings under ~~two~~its revolving credit ~~arrangements that are~~arrangement described below. The Company believes its current cash resources, projected operating cash flow, and remaining capacity under its continuing bank lines of credit are sufficient to cover all of its expected working capital needs, planned capital expenditures, dividends, and other cash requirements, excluding potential acquisitions.

The Company’s total cash and cash equivalents held by foreign subsidiaries ~~in which earnings are considered indefinitely reinvested,~~ was approximately ~~$27.0~~$28.6 million and ~~$17.5~~$13.4 million as of ~~November 30,~~February 28, 2014 and 2013, ~~and 2012,~~ respectively. ~~The Company considers these funds to be permanently reinvested, and would need to accrue and pay taxes if these funds were repatriated.~~ The Company does not intend to repatriate the funds, and does not expect these funds to have a significant impact on the Company’s overall liquidity. The Company considers its earnings in foreign subsidiaries to be permanently reinvested and would need to accrue and pay taxes if these funds were repatriated.

Net working capital was ~~$275.9~~$281.7 million at ~~November 30, 2013,~~February 28, 2014, as compared with ~~$234.2~~$255.7 million at ~~November 30, 2012.~~February 28, 2013. The increase in net working capital primarily resulted from increased cash generated by earnings and receivables driven by the timing of collections on large ~~project related~~ international ~~sales. In addition, the working capital increased due to the Claude Laval Corporation, which was acquired during the end of fiscal 2013.~~sales projects.

Cash flows provided by operations totaled ~~$5.9~~$32.4 million during the ~~three~~six months ended ~~November 30, 2013~~February 28, 2014 compared to ~~$13.5~~$26.2 million provided by operations during the same prior year period. Cash provided by operations decreased by ~~$7.5~~$6.3 million compared to the prior year period primarily as a result of decreased earnings ($~~4.5~~10.4 million) and negative cash flow changes in payables ($~~15.9~~20.6 million) offset in part by increases due to positive cash flow changes in receivables ($~~4.8~~31.9 million) and inventories ($~~7.7~~12.6 million).

Cash flows used in investing activities totaled ~~$3.3~~$6.9 million during the ~~three~~six months ended ~~November 30, 2013 and 2012.~~February 28, 2014 compared to $7.2 million used in investing activities during the same prior year period. Capital spending of ~~$2.4~~$5.4 million in fiscal 2014 increased compared to the prior year capital spending of ~~$2.2~~$5.3 million. The capital spending increase was offset by ~~$0.2~~$0.4 million ~~decrease~~increase from net settlements of net investment hedges.

Cash flows used in financing activities totaled ~~$3.2~~$12.6 million during the ~~three~~six months ended ~~November 30, 2013~~February 28, 2014 compared to cash flows used in financing activities of ~~$1.7~~$3.3 million during the same prior year period. The increase in cash used in financing activities was primarily ~~due~~related to ~~a $2.4~~share repurchases of $6.6 million ~~change in share-based compensation activities~~ and ~~$0.2 million increase in cash dividends paid offset by a $1.1 million reduction in interest bearing debt payments.~~dividend increases of $2.1 million. The Company’s total interest-bearing debt decreased from ~~$3.2~~$2.3 million at ~~November 30, 2012~~February 28, 2013 to none at ~~November 30, 2013.~~February 28, 2014.

The Company’s capital allocation plan articulates the Company’s plans to continue to invest in attaining revenue and earnings growth, combined with a defined process for enhancing returns to ~~shareholders through dividends and share repurchases.~~shareholders. Under the Company’s announced capital allocation plan in January 2014, the priorities for uses of cash include:

Capital expenditures for fiscal 2014 are estimated to be approximately $15.0 million to $20.0 million largely focused on manufacturing capacity expansion and productivity improvements. The Company’s ~~Board~~capital expenditure plan includes investments in a manufacturing operation in Turkey, which is planned to be operational early in fiscal 2015 and should accommodate long-term growth plans for several international markets. The Company’s management does maintain flexibility to modify the amount and timing of ~~Directors increased~~some of the planned expenditures in response to economic conditions.

In the second quarter of fiscal 2014, the Company doubled its ~~regular~~ quarterly cash dividend ~~by 100%~~ to $0.26 per ~~share, payable February 28, 2014,~~common share. The Company expects to continue paying quarterly dividends and provide annual dividend increases to shareholders, subject to declaration by the Board of ~~record on February 14, 2014.~~Directors.

~~The Company’s~~On January 3, 2014, the Company announced that its Board of Directors ~~replaced~~terminated its existing share repurchase authorization to purchase up to a maximum of 881,139 shares of its common stock, effective as of January 2, 2014, and replaced it with an increased authorization to repurchase up to ~~$150~~$150.0 million of common stock through January 2, 2016. During the three and six months ended February 28, 2014, the Company repurchased 78,520 shares of common stock for an aggregate purchase price of $6.6 million. During the three and six months ended February 28, 2013, the Company did not repurchase shares of common stock. The ~~authorization is in support of~~remaining amount available under the ~~Company’s plans to opportunistically~~ repurchase ~~$100~~program was $143.4 million ~~to $150 million of common stock over the next 24 months.~~

The Company’s wholly-owned European subsidiary, Lindsay Europe SAS, has an unsecured revolving line of credit with Societe Generale, a European commercial bank, under which it may borrow for working capital purposes up to 2.3 million Euros, which equates to approximately $3.1 million U.S. dollars as of November 30, 2013 (the “Euro Line of Credit”). There were no borrowings outstanding on this credit agreement at November 30, 2013 and 2012 and August 31, 2013. Under the terms of the Euro Line of Credit, borrowings, if any, bear interest at a floating rate in effect from time to time designated by the commercial bank as the Euro Interbank Offered Rate plus 110 basis points (1.33 percent at November 30, 2013). Unpaid principal and interest is due by January 31,February 28, 2014. ~~The Company intends to replace the Euro Line of Credit upon expiration of its term.~~

The Company has an unsecured $30.0 million Revolving Credit Note and Credit Agreement with Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., which was amended on ~~February 13, 2013 in order to extend the termination date from~~ January ~~23,~~22, 2014 to ~~February 13, 2016~~revise letter of credit expiry dates and cash collateralization procedures (“the “Revolving Credit Agreement”). The borrowings from the Revolving Credit Agreement may primarily be used for working capital purposes and funding acquisitions. At ~~November 30,~~February 28, 2014 and 2013 ~~and 2012~~ and August 31, 2013, ~~there was~~the Company had no outstanding ~~balance~~borrowings on the Revolving Credit Agreement. The amount of borrowings available at any time under the Revolving Credit Agreement is reduced by the amount of standby letters of credit then outstanding. At February 28, 2014, the Company had the ability to borrow $24.5 million under this facility, after consideration of standby letters of credit of $5.5 million. Borrowings under the Revolving Credit Agreement bear interest at a rate equal to LIBOR plus 90 basis points ~~(1.07~~(1.06 percent as of ~~November 30, 2013)~~February 28, 2014), subject to adjustment as set forth in the Revolving Credit Agreement. Interest is paid on a monthly to quarterly basis depending on loan type. The Company also pays an annual commitment fee of 0.25 percent on the unused portion of the Revolving Credit Agreement. Any unpaid principal and interest is due by February 13, 2016.

The Revolving Credit Agreement contains certain covenants relating to the Company’s financial condition. These include maintaining a funded debt to EBITDA ratio, a fixed charge coverage ratio, a current ratio and a tangible net worth requirement at specified levels. Upon the occurrence of any event of default of these covenants, including a change in control of the Company, all amounts due thereunder may be declared to be immediately due and payable. ~~The BSI Term Note contained substantially similar covenants.~~ At ~~November 30,~~February 28, 2014 and 2013 ~~and 2012~~ and August 31, 2013, the Company was in compliance with all loan covenants.

The Company’s wholly-owned European subsidiary, Lindsay Europe SAS, had an unsecured revolving line of credit with Societe Generale, a European commercial bank, under which it could borrow for working capital purposes up to 2.3 million Euros. This line of credit expired on January 31, 2014. The Company intends to put a new credit arrangement in place during the second half of fiscal 2014.

There have been no material changes in the Company’s contractual obligations and commercial commitments as described in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended August 31, 2013.

ITEM 3- – Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

There have been no material changes from the Company’s quantitative and qualitative disclosures about market risk previously disclosed in the Company’s most recent Annual Report filed on Form 10-K. See discussion of the Company’s quantitative and qualitative disclosures about market risk under Part II, Item 7A in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the Company’s fiscal year ended August 31, 2013.

The Company carried out an evaluation under the supervision and the participation of the Company’s management, including the Company’s Chief Executive Officer (CEO) and Chief Financial Officer (CFO), of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e). Based upon that evaluation, the CEO and CFO concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of ~~November 30, 2013.~~February 28, 2014.

Additionally, the CEO and CFO determined that there has not been any change to the Company’s internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) during the last fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

See the disclosure in Note 9 – Commitments and Contingencies to the condensed consolidated financial statements set forth in Part I, Item 1 of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, which disclosure is hereby incorporated herein by reference.

There have been no material changes from risk factors previously disclosed in the Company’s most recent Annual Report ~~filed~~ on Form 10-K. See the discussion of the Company’s risk factors under Part I, Item 1A in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the Company’s fiscal year ended August 31, 2013.

ITEM 2 – Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

The table below sets forth information with respect to purchases of the Company’s common stock made by or on behalf of the Company during the three months ended February 28, 2014:

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized on this 628^th day of ~~January~~March 2014.


Delaware		47-0554096
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		(I.R.S. Employer
~~incorporation or organization)~~		Identification No.)


2222 N. 111th Street, Omaha, Nebraska		68164
(Address of principal executive offices)		(Zip Code)


				Page No.

Part I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION

	ITEM 1–*Financial Statements*

			Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three and six months ended ~~November 30,~~February 28, 2014 and 2013 ~~and 2012~~		3

			Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the three and six months ended ~~November 30,~~February 28, 2014 and 2013 ~~and 2012~~		4

			Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of ~~November 30,~~February 28, 2014 and 2013 ~~and 2012~~ and August 31, 2013		5

			Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the ~~three~~six months ended ~~November 30,~~February 28, 2014 and 2013 ~~and 2012~~		6

			Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements		7

	*ITEM 2 –Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Conditionand Results of Operations*				1514

	*ITEM 3 –Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk***				22

	*ITEM 4 –Controls and Procedures***				22

*~~ITEM 3 –~~~~Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk~~***					20

*~~ITEM 4 –~~~~Controls and Procedures~~***		20

Part II – OTHER INFORMATION

	*ITEM 1 –Legal Proceedings***				2023

	*ITEM 1A –Risk Factors***				23

	*ITEM 2 –Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds***				23

	*ITEM 6 –Exhibits***				24

*~~ITEM 1A –~~SIGNATURES~~Risk Factors~~***					20

*~~ITEM 6 –~~~~Exhibits~~***		21

~~SIGNATURES~~		2225


	Three months ended November 30,
	2013				2012
			Grant-Date Fair Value				Grant-Date Fair Value
	# Granted		Per Award		# Granted		Per Award
Stock options		25,394	$	40.42		24,684	$	40.09
RSUs		29,619	$	74.84		25,279	$	74.31
PSUs		13,434	$	74.84		13,072	$	74.31


	Amount of Gain/(Loss) Recognized in OCI on Derivatives
	Three months ended
	November 30,			November 30,
($ in thousands)	2013			2012
Foreign currency forward contracts, net of tax expense (benefit) of ($403) and ($385)	$	(695	)	$	(631	)


	Amount of Gain/(Loss) Recognized in OCI on Derivatives
	Three months ended					Six months ended
	February 28,			February 28,		February 28,			February 28,
($ in thousands)	2014			2013		2014			2013
Foreign currency forward contracts, net of tax expense (benefit) of ($196), $169, ($599) and ($216)	$	(245	)	$	133	$	(940	)	$	(498	)


	Grant Year
	2013			2012
Weighted-average dividend yield		0.68	%		0.61	%
Weighted-average volatility		55.23	%		56.26	%
Range of risk-free interest rates		1.91	%		1.21	%
Weighted-average expected lives		7 years			7 years


$ in thousands	Amount
Identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed:
Current assets	$	8,656
Property and equipment		7,867
Intangible assets		13,600
Other long-term assets		738
Current liabilities		(1,808	)
Long-term debt		(1,400	)
Other long-term liabilities		(5,500	)

Total identifiable net assets acquired		22,153
Goodwill		6,854

Total	$	29,007


$ in thousands	Weighted Average Useful Life in Years		Fair Value of Identifiable Asset
Intangible assets:
Tradenames		N/A	$	6,500
Patents		10.0		4,600
Customer relationships		5.0		1,600
Non-compete agreements		5.0		500
Other		1.3		400

Total intangible assets			$	13,600


Period	Total Number of Shares Purchased		Average Price Paid Per Share		Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs		Maximum Number or Approximate Dollar Value of Shares That May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs⁽¹⁾ ($ in thousands)
December 1, 2013 to December 31, 2013		—	$	—		—		881,139 Shares
January 1, 2014 to January 31, 2014		66,027	$	84.03		66,027	$	144,452
February 1, 2014 to February 28, 2014		12,493	$	84.60		12,493	$	143,395

Total		78,520	$	84.12		78,520	$	143,395


Exhibit No.		Description

3.1		Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Company, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on December 14, 2006.

3.2		Amended and RestatedBy-Laws of the Company, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on February 3, 2011.

4.1		Specimen Form of Common Stock Certificate, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4(a) of the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended November 30, 2006.

10.1*		~~Lindsay Corporation Management Incentive Plan (“MIP”),~~Fourth Amendment to Credit Agreement, dated January 22, 2014, Plan Year. † **by and between the Company and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association.

10.2*		Lindsay Corporation ~~Policy~~Management Incentive Umbrella Plan, approved by the stockholders on ~~Payment of Directors Fees and Expenses. †~~January 27, 2014.

31.1*		Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 18 U.S.C. Section 1350.

31.2*		Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 18 U.S.C. Section 1350.

32.1*		Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 18 U.S.C. Section 1350.

101.INS*** 101*		~~XBRL Instance Document~~

101.SCH***		~~XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document~~

101.CAL***		~~XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document~~

101.DEF***		~~XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document~~

101.LAB***		~~XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document~~

101.PRE***		~~XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document~~ Interactive Data Files.


		LINDSAY CORPORATION

		By:		~~/s/~~ /s/ JAMES C. RAABE
		Name:		James C. Raabe
		Title:		Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
				(on behalf of the registrant and as principal financial officer)

Large accelerated filer

Accelerated filer

Non-accelerated filer

¨ (Do not check if smaller reporting company)

Smaller reporting company