Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ¨ No x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definition of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No x

All of the outstanding capital stock of the registrant is held by Century Intermediate Holding Company. As of ~~January 8,~~July 14, 2014, 100 shares of the registrant’s common stock, par value $0.01 per share, were outstanding.


	(Unaudited)												(Unaudited)
	Three Months Ended						Nine Months Ended						Three Months Ended
	November 29, 2013			November 23, 2012			November 29, 2013			November 23, 2012			May 30, 2014			May 31, 2013
Net sales	$	502,107		$	499,368		$	1,406,319		$	1,275,139		$	497,274		$	490,545
Other revenue		5,409			7,446			18,921			18,617			6,310			6,758

Total revenue		507,516			506,814			1,425,240			1,293,756			503,584			497,303

Material, labor and other production costs		244,829			244,071			625,340			584,667			200,786			203,837
Selling, distribution and marketing expenses		177,154			190,041			502,500			466,199			172,259			170,339
Administrative and general expenses		74,814			74,483			228,578			225,521			69,295			71,080
Other operating (income) expense – net		(2,368	)		(1,977	)		(6,647	)		9,017

Other operating income – net														(1,968	)		(3,318	)

Operating income		13,087			196			75,469			8,352			63,212			55,365

Interest expense		8,454			4,504			18,199			13,314			8,994			4,312
Interest income		(29	)		(65	)		(222	)		(297	)		(111	)		(120	)
Other non-operating expense (income) – net		1,047			(2,144	)		(4,351	)		(6,915	)
Other non-operating income – net														(1,107	)		(1,373	)

Income before income tax expense														55,436			52,546
Income tax expense														11,697			19,153

Income (loss) before income tax expense (benefit)		3,615			(2,099	)		61,843			2,250
Net income													$	43,739		$	33,393

Income tax expense (benefit)		310			(1,290	)		30,366			63


Net income (loss)	$	3,305		$	(809	)	$	31,477		$	2,187


	(Unaudited)											(Unaudited)
	Three Months Ended					Nine Months Ended						Three Months Ended
	November 29, 2013		November 23, 2012			November 29, 2013			November 23, 2012			May 30, 2014			May 31, 2013
Net income (loss)	$	3,305	$	(809	)	$	31,477		$	2,187

Net income												$	43,739		$	33,393
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax:
Foreign currency translation adjustments		9,996		2,680			8,336			(91	)		1,866			(2,155	)
Pension and postretirement benefit adjustments		192		145			1,009			643			(23	)		377
Unrealized loss on securities		—		—			(4	)		(1	)
Unrealized gain on securities													—			1

Other comprehensive income, net of tax		10,188		2,825			9,341			551
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax													1,843			(1,777	)

Comprehensive income	$	13,493	$	2,016		$	40,818		$	2,738		$	45,582		$	31,616


	(Unaudited)			(Note 1)			(Unaudited)			(Unaudited)		(Note 1)		(Unaudited)
	November 29, 2013			February 28, 2013			November 23, 2012			May 30, 2014		February 28, 2014		May 31, 2013
ASSETS

Current assets
Cash and cash equivalents	$	15,775		$	86,059		$	63,291		$	64,990	$	63,963	$	63,997
Trade accounts receivable, net		201,392			105,497			197,844			134,185		97,925		122,303
Inventories		291,372			242,447			264,330			259,837		254,761		237,824
Deferred and refundable income taxes		47,252			72,560			80,502			43,862		46,996		59,181
Prepaid expenses and other		151,277			155,343			155,543			139,337		146,164		150,779

Total current assets		707,068			661,906			761,510			642,211		609,809		634,084

Other assets		421,326			456,751			460,647			537,453		542,766		449,770
Deferred and refundable income taxes		98,646			92,354			120,870			71,232		74,103		88,920

Property, plant and equipment – at cost		848,233			821,759			809,439			876,634		855,141		834,272
Less accumulated depreciation		468,015			449,307			447,747			491,621		479,376		459,192

Property, plant and equipment – net		380,218			372,452			361,692			385,013		375,765		375,080

	$	1,607,258		$	1,583,463		$	1,704,719		$	1,635,909	$	1,602,443	$	1,547,854


LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDER’S EQUITY

Current liabilities
Debt due within one year	$	20,000		$	—		$	—		$	20,000	$	20,000	$	—
Accounts payable		124,163			119,777			194,945			103,701		120,568		111,180
Accrued liabilities		64,792			80,098			82,893			68,012		68,838		82,171
Accrued compensation and benefits		63,910			69,309			60,702			40,514		74,017		34,942
Income taxes payable		2,745			4,968			14,641			3,706		14,866		4,952
Deferred revenue		25,438			31,851			26,404			30,360		31,288		31,872
Other current liabilities		68,408			62,593			44,287			82,679		85,785		64,585

Total current liabilities		369,456			368,596			423,872			348,972		415,362		329,702

Long-term debt		622,328			286,381			356,832			596,702		539,114		260,281
Other liabilities		231,585			225,044			259,787			303,937		301,815		225,101
Deferred income taxes and noncurrent income taxes payable		19,921			21,565			21,008			13,270		18,705		21,730

Shareholder’s equity
Common shares – par value $.01 per share: 100 shares issued and outstanding		—			—			—			—		—		—
Common shares – Class A		—			29,088			28,849			—		—		29,398
Common shares – Class B		—			2,883			2,860			—		—		2,912
Capital in excess of par value		240,000			522,425			520,119			240,000		240,000		525,234
Treasury stock		—			(1,093,782	)		(1,093,789	)		—		—		(1,093,407	)
Accumulated other comprehensive loss		(7,792	)		(17,133	)		(11,279	)
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)											2,595		752		(18,910	)
Retained earnings		131,760			1,238,396			1,196,460			130,433		86,695		1,265,813

Total shareholder’s equity		363,968			681,877			643,220			373,028		327,447		711,040

	$	1,607,258		$	1,583,463		$	1,704,719		$	1,635,909	$	1,602,443	$	1,547,854

Three ~~and Nine~~ Months Ended ~~November 29,~~May 30, 2014 and May 31, 2013 ~~and November 23, 2012~~

The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements of American Greetings Corporation and its subsidiaries (the “Corporation”) have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and notes required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring adjustments) considered necessary to fairly present financial position, results of operations and cash flows for the periods have been included. On August 9, 2013, the Corporation completed a merger whereby the Corporation was acquired by Century Intermediate Holding Company, a company that was formed by the Chairman of the Board, the co-Chief Executive Officers of the Corporation and certain other members of the Weiss family and related ~~entities. See Note 3 for further information.~~entities (the “Merger”). As a result of the ~~merger,~~Merger, the Corporation’s equity is no longer publicly traded. As such, earnings per share information is not required, and therefore prior period earnings per share information is not included in this Form 10-Q.

The Corporation’s fiscal year ends on February 28 or 29. References to a particular year refer to the fiscal year ending in February of that year. For example, ~~2013~~2014 refers to the year ended February 28, ~~2013.~~2014. The Corporation’s subsidiary, AG Retail Cards Limited ~~which operates the recently acquired retail stores in the United Kingdom (also referred to herein as “UK”),~~ is consolidated on a one-month lag corresponding with its fiscal year-end of ~~February 1~~January 31 for ~~2014. See Note 4 for further information.~~

The Corporation’s first fiscal quarter begins each year on March 1. The Corporation’s fiscal quarters generally end on the last Friday of the month in which the fiscal quarter ends. In the current year, the first quarter ended on May 31, 2013 and consisted of 92 days. The prior year first quarter ended on May 25, 2012 and consisted of 86 days. This resulted in six additional selling days in the current year first quarter. This fiscal timing will not impact the full year results as the current year fourth quarter will consist of six less days compared to the prior year fourth quarter.2015.

These interim financial statements should be read in conjunction with the Corporation’s financial statements and notes thereto included in its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended February 28, ~~2013,~~2014, from which the Consolidated Statement of Financial Position at February 28, ~~2013,~~2014, presented herein, has been derived. Certain amounts in the prior year financial statements have been reclassified to conform to the 2014 presentation. These reclassifications had no material impact on financial position, earnings or cash flows.

The Corporation’s investments in less than majority-owned companies in which it has the ability to exercise significant influence over the operation and financial policies are accounted for using the equity method except when they qualify as variable interest entities (“VIE”) and the Corporation is the primary beneficiary, in which case, the investments are consolidated in accordance with Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 810 (“ASC 810”), “Consolidation.” Investments that do not meet the above criteria are accounted for under the cost method.

AsPrior to the fourth quarter of ~~November 29, 2013,~~2014, the Corporation held an ~~approximately~~approximate 15% equity interest in Schurman Fine Papers (“Schurman”), which is a VIE as defined in ASC 810. Schurman owns and operates specialty card and gift retail stores in the United States and Canada. The stores are primarily located in malls and strip shopping centers. During the ~~current period,~~third quarter of 2014, the Corporation ~~reassessed~~determined that, due to continued operating losses, shareholders’ deficit and lack of return on the ~~variable interests~~Corporation’s investment, the cost method investment was permanently impaired. As a result, the Corporation recorded an impairment charge in the amount of $1.9 million which reduced the carrying amount of the investment to zero. In addition, during the fourth quarter of 2014, in order to mitigate ongoing risks to the Corporation that may arise from retaining an equity interest in Schurman, the Corporation transferred to Schurman its 15% equity interest and, ~~determined that~~as a ~~third party holder of variable interests~~result, no longer has ~~the controlling financial~~an equity interest in the VIE and thus, the third party, not the Corporation, is the primary beneficiary. In completing this assessment, the Corporation identified the activities that it considers most significant to the future economic success of the VIE and determined that it does not have the power to direct those activities. As such, Schurman is not consolidated in the Corporation’s results. The Corporation’s maximum exposure to loss as it relates to Schurman as of November 29, 2013 includes:Schurman.

The Corporation provides Schurman limited credit support through the provision of a liquidity guaranty (“Liquidity ~~Guaranty~~Guaranty”) in favor of the lenders under Schurman’s senior revolving credit facility (the “Senior Credit Facility”). Pursuant to the terms of the Liquidity Guaranty, the Corporation has guaranteed the repayment of up to $10.0 million of Schurman’s borrowings under the Senior Credit Facility to help ensure that Schurman has sufficient borrowing availability under this facility. The Liquidity Guaranty is required to be backed by a letter of credit for the term of the Liquidity Guaranty, which is currently anticipated to end in July 2016. The Corporation’s obligations under the Liquidity Guaranty generally may not be triggered unless Schurman’s lenders under its Senior Credit Facility have substantially completed the liquidation of the collateral under Schurman’s Senior Credit Facility, or 91 days after the liquidation is started, whichever is earlier, and will be limited to the deficiency, if any, between the amount owed and the amount collected in connection with the liquidation. There was no triggering event or liquidation of collateral as of ~~November 29, 2013~~May 30, 2014 requiring the use of the Liquidity Guaranty.

During the current period, the Corporation assessed the variable interests in Schurman and determined that a third party holder of variable interests has the controlling financial interest in the VIE and thus, the third party, not the Corporation, is the primary beneficiary. In completing this assessment, the Corporation identified the activities that it considers most significant to the future economic success of the VIE and determined that it does not have the power to direct those activities. As such, Schurman is not consolidated in the Corporation’s results. The Corporation’s maximum exposure to loss as it relates to Schurman as of May 30, 2014 includes:

During the quarter ended ~~November 29, 2013,~~May 30, 2014, the Corporation ~~determined~~identified and corrected errors in the accounting for income taxes that ~~due~~related to ~~continued~~the year ended February 28, 2014. These errors primarily related to the Corporation’s failure to consider all sources of available taxable income when assessing the need for a valuation allowance against certain deferred tax assets and the recognition of a liability for an uncertain tax position. These errors were the result of the significant complexity created as a result of the Merger and related transactions. The impact of correcting these items had a non-cash effect, decreasing tax expense and increasing net income by $4.1 million. Based on its evaluation as discussed more fully below, the Corporation concluded that the corrections to the financial statements were immaterial to its financial results for the year ended February 28, 2014 and its expected financial results for the year ending February 28, 2015.

In accordance with ASC Topic 250, Accounting Changes and Error Corrections, the Corporation evaluated the effects of the errors on its financial statements for the year ended February 28, 2014 and the expected full year financial results for the year ending February 28, 2015 and concluded that the results of operations for these periods are not materially misstated. In reaching its conclusion, the Corporation considered numerous qualitative and quantitative factors, including but not limited to the following:

Based on its evaluation, the Corporation concluded that it is not probable that the judgment of a reasonable person relying on the financial statements would have been changed or influenced by the error or correction of the current year third quarter, in order to mitigate ongoing risks to the Corporation that may arise from retaining an equity interest in Schurman, the Corporation transferred to Schurman its 15% equity interest and, as a result, no longer has an equity interest in Schurman.error.

In addition, the Corporation held an $8.8 million investment in the common stock of Party City Holdings, Inc (“Party City”), which was accounted for under the cost method. On August 1, 2013, the Corporation received a cash distribution from Party City totaling $12.1 million, which was in part a return of capital that reduced the carrying amount of the investment to zero, the remainder of which is included in “Other non-operating (income) expense – net” on the Consolidated Statement of Operations. See Note 7 for further information.

A significant portion of the Corporation’s business is seasonal in nature. Therefore, the results of operations for interim periods are not necessarily indicative of the results for the fiscal year taken as a whole.

At a special meeting of the Corporation’s shareholders held on August 7, 2013, the shareholders voted to adopt the Agreement and Plan of Merger, as amended, dated March 29, 2013, among the Corporation, Century Intermediate Holding Company, a Delaware corporation (“Parent”), and Century Merger Company, an Ohio corporation and a wholly-owned subsidiary of Parent (“Merger Sub”), and the merger contemplated thereby (the “Merger”). On August 9, 2013, the Corporation completed the Merger. As a result of the Merger, the Corporation is now wholly owned by Parent, which is owned by Morry Weiss, the Chairman of the Board of the Corporation, Zev Weiss, a co-Chief Executive Officer of the Corporation, Jeff Weiss, a co-Chief Executive Officer of the Corporation, and certain other members of the Weiss family and related entities (“Family Shareholders”).

In connection with the Merger, common shares held by the shareholders of the Corporation, other than the Family Shareholders, were converted into the right to receive $19.00 per share in cash. Common shares held by the Family Shareholders were contributed to Parent as equity and thereafter cancelled for no consideration. As a result of the Merger, all formerly outstanding and treasury Class A and Class B common shares have been cancelled. As described in the Agreement and Plan of Merger, all stock based compensation plans of the Corporation were modified, settled or cancelled as a result of the Merger. All outstanding stock based compensation related to the Family Shareholders was cancelled without consideration. For employee stock based compensation, other than Family Shareholder employees, all outstanding stock options were settled for cash and the performance share and restricted stock unit programs were converted into cash programs, with any performance shares and restricted stock units being converted to the right to receive $19.00 per share in the event that the performance share or restricted stock units are earned by the employee at a future date.

The Corporation incurred costs associated with the Merger which included transaction costs and incremental compensation expense related to the settlement of stock options and modification and cancellation of outstanding restricted stock units and performance shares. The charges incurred in the nine months ended November 29, 2013 associated with the Merger that do not have comparative amounts in the prior year period are reflected on the Consolidated Statement of Operations as follows:

The Corporation will continue to apply its historical basis of accounting in its stand-alone financial statements after the Merger. This is based on the determination under Accounting Standards Codification Topic 805, “Business Combinations,” that Parent is the acquiring entity and the determination under SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 54, codified as Topic 5J, “Push Down Basis of Accounting Required In Certain Limited Circumstances,” that while the push down of Parent’s basis in the Corporation is permissible, it is not required due to the existence of significant outstanding public debt securities of the Corporation before and after the Merger. In concluding that the outstanding public debt is significant, the Corporation considered both quantitative and qualitative factors, including both the book value and fair value of the outstanding public debt securities, as well as a number of provisions contained within the securities which impacted Parent’s ability to control their form of ownership of the Corporation.

In connection with the Merger, Parent issued $245 million of preferred stock. Parent may elect to either accrue or pay cash for dividends on the preferred stock. The preferred stock carries a cash dividend rate of LIBOR plus 11.5%. Prior to the payment of dividends by Parent, it is expected that the Corporation will provide Parent with the cash flow for Parent to pay dividends on the preferred stock. Assuming the dividends are paid regularly in cash, rather than accrued, the annual cash required to pay the dividend is expected to be approximately $29 million while

the entire issuance of the preferred stock is outstanding. During the three months ended November 29, 2013, the Corporation made a cash dividend payment of $18.2 million to Parent of which $4.2 million was used for the payment of dividends on the preferred stock.

Also in connection with the Merger, the Corporation paid approximately $14 million of stock issuance and transaction related expenses on behalf of Parent. Parent repaid this amount on October 1, 2013.

During the first quarter of 2013, the Corporation acquired all of the outstanding senior secured debt of Clinton Cards for $56.6 million (£35 million) through Lakeshore Lending Limited (“Lakeshore”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Corporation organized under the laws of the UK. Subsequently, on May 9, 2012, Clinton Cards was placed into administration, a procedure similar to Chapter 11 bankruptcy in the United States. Prior to entering into administration, Clinton Cards had approximately 750 stores and annual revenues of approximately $600 million across its two primary retail brands, Clinton Cards and Birthdays. The legacy Clinton Cards business had been an important customer to the Corporation’s international business for approximately forty years and was one of the Corporation’s largest customers.

As part of the administration process, the administrators (“Administrators”) of Clinton Cards and certain of its subsidiaries (the “Sellers”) conducted an auction of certain assets of the business of the Sellers that they believed constituted a viable ongoing business. Lakeshore bid $37.2 million (£23 million) for certain of these remaining assets. The bid took the form of a “credit bid,” where the Corporation used a portion of the outstanding senior secured debt owed to Lakeshore by Clinton Cards to pay the purchase price for the assets. The bid was accepted by the Administrators and on June 6, 2012 the Corporation entered into an agreement with the Sellers and the Administrators for the purchase of certain assets and the related business of the Sellers.

Under the terms of the agreement, the Corporation originally expected to acquire approximately 400 stores from the Sellers, together with related inventory and overhead, as well as the Clinton Cards and related brands. As of November 29, 2013, the Corporation had completed 388 lease assignments. The number of stores that the Corporation is operating, including both lease assignments and new stores, is 403. The estimated future minimum rental payments for noncancelable operating leases related to the 403 stores is approximately $370 million.

The stores and assets not acquired by the Corporation remain part of the administration process. It is anticipated that these remaining assets not purchased by the Corporation will be liquidated and the proceeds will be used to repay the creditors of the Sellers, including the Corporation. The Corporation will seek to recover the remaining senior secured debt claim held by it through the liquidation process. However, based on the estimated recovery information provided by the Administrators, the Corporation recorded an aggregate charge of $8.1 million in 2013 relating to the senior secured debt it acquired in the first quarter of the prior year. In the nine months ended November 29, 2013, based on updated estimated recovery information provided by the Administrators, the Corporation recorded adjustments to the charge resulting in first, second and third quarter gains of $2.0 million, $0.4 million and $1.8 million, respectively. In the second quarter of 2014 the Corporation received a cash distribution from the Administrators of $5.0 million. The remaining balance of the senior secured debt is $10.4 million (£6.4 million) as of November 29, 2013 and is included in “Prepaid expenses and other” on the Consolidated Statement of Financial Position. The liquidation process was originally expected to take approximately twelve months from the closing of the transaction on June 6, 2012. The process is currently expected to be completed during fiscal year 2015.

~~The prior year nine month period included charges of $37.5 million associated with the aforementioned acquisition and are reflected on the Consolidated Statement of Operations as follows:~~

~~These charges are reflected in the Corporation’s reportable segments as follows:~~

The fair value of the consideration given has been allocated to the assets acquired and the liabilities assumed based upon their fair values at the date of acquisition. The following represents the final purchase price allocation:

The financial results of this acquisition are included in the Corporation’s consolidated results from the date of acquisition. Pro forma results of operations have not been presented because the effect of this acquisition was not deemed material at the date of acquisition. The acquired business is included in the Corporation’s Retail Operations segment.

In ~~July 2013,~~May 2014, the ~~FASB~~Financial Accounting Standards Board (the “FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2014-09, (“ASU 2014-09”), “Revenue from Contracts with Customers”. The objective ofASU 2014-19 is to establish a single comprehensive model for entities to use in accounting for revenue arising from contracts with customers and will supersede most of the existing revenue recognition guidance, including industry-specific guidance. The core principle of ASU 2014-09 is that an entity recognizes revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. In applying the new guidance, an entity will (1) identify the contract(s) with a customer; (2) identify the performance obligations in the contract; (3) determine the transaction price; (4) allocate the transaction price to the contract’s performance obligations; and (5) recognize revenue when (or as) the entity satisfies a performance obligation. ASU 2014-09 applies to all contracts with customers except those that are within the scope of other topics in the FASB Accounting Standards Codification. The new guidance is effective for annual reporting periods (including interim periods within those periods) beginning after December 15, 2016 for public companies. Early adoption is not permitted. Entities have the option of using either a full retrospective or modified approach to adopt ASU 2014-09. The Corporation is currently evaluating the new guidance and has not determined the impact this standard may have on its financial statements nor decided upon the method of adoption.

In April 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-08 (“ASU 2014-08”), “Reporting Discontinued Operations and Disclosures of Disposals of Components of an Entity.” ASU 2014-08 changes the criteria for determining which disposals can be presented as discontinued operations and modifies the related disclosure requirements. Under the new guidance, a disposal of a component of an entity or a group of components of an entity is required to be reported in discontinued operations if the disposal represents a strategic shift that has (or will have) a major effect on an entity’s operations and financial results and is disposed of or classified as held for sale. The standard also introduces several new disclosures. The guidance applies prospectively to new disposals and new classifications of disposal groups as held for sale after the effective date. ASU 2014-08 is effective for annual and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2014, with early adoption permitted. The Corporation does not expect that the adoption of this standard will have a material effect on its financial statements.

In July 2013, the FASB issued ASU No. 2013-11 (“ASU 2013-11”), “Presentation of an Unrecognized Tax Benefit When a Net Operating Loss Carryforward, a Similar Tax Loss, or a Tax Credit Carryforward Exists.” ASU 2013-11 requires an unrecognized tax benefit, or a portion of an unrecognized tax benefit, to be presented in the financial statements as a reduction to a deferred tax asset for a net operating loss carryforward, a similar tax loss, or a tax credit carryforward, except as follows. To the extent a net operating loss carryforward, a similar tax loss, or a tax credit carryforward is not available at the reporting date, the unrecognized tax benefit should be presented in the financial statements as a liability and not combined with deferred tax assets. ASU 2013-11 is effective for annual and interim periods beginning after December 15, ~~2014,~~2013 for public companies, with early adoption permitted. The Corporation ~~does not expect that the adoption of this standard will have a material effect on its financial statements.~~

~~In February 2013, the FASB issued~~adopted ASU No. 2013-02 (“ASU 2013-02”), “Reporting of Amounts Reclassified Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income.” ASU 2013-02 requires entities to disclose additional information about changes in other comprehensive income by component. In addition, an entity is required to present, either on the face of the statement where income is presented or in the notes, significant amounts reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income and the income statement line items affected. The provisions of this guidance are effective prospectively for annual and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2012. The Corporation adopted this standard2013-11 on March 1, ~~2013. See Note 8 for further information.~~2014.

In July 2012, the FASB issued ASU No. 2012-02 (“ASU 2012-02”), “Testing Indefinite-Lived Intangible Assets for Impairment.” ASU 2012-02 gives entities an option to first assess qualitative factors to determine whether the existence of events and circumstances indicate that it is more likely than not that an indefinite-lived intangible asset is impaired. If based on its qualitative assessment an entity concludes that it is more likely than not that the fair value of an indefinite-lived intangible asset is less than its carrying amount, quantitative impairment testing is required. However, if an entity concludes otherwise, quantitative impairment testing is not required. ASU 2012-02 is effective for annual and interim impairment tests performed for fiscal years beginning after September 15, 2012. The Corporation adopted this standard on March 1, 2013. The adoption of this standard did not have a material effect on the Corporation’s financial statements.

The Corporation has agreements for licensing the Care Bears and Strawberry Shortcake characters and other intellectual property. These license agreements provide for royalty revenue to the Corporation, which is recorded in “Other revenue” on the Consolidated Statement of ~~Operations.~~Income. These license agreements may include the receipt of upfront advances, which are recorded as deferred revenue and earned during the period of the agreement. Revenues and expenses associated with the servicing of these agreements, primarily relating to the licensing activities included in non-reportable segments, are summarized as follows:

In addition to the expenses disclosed above, during the prior year first quarter, the Corporation incurred charges of $2.1 million associated with its licensing business. See Note 7 for further information.

~~The~~During the three months ended May 30, 2014, the Corporation recorded ~~a loss~~an impairment recovery of ~~$10.0~~$3.4 million ~~during the nine months ended November 23, 2012,~~ related to the senior secured debt of Clinton ~~Cards.~~ Cards that the Corporation acquired in May 2012 and subsequently impaired. This recovery, which was based on current estimated recovery information provided by the bankruptcy administrators of the Clinton Cards liquidation (“Administrators”), represents the final amount of a full recovery of the prior impairment. The liquidation process is expected to be completed during fiscal 2015.

During the three ~~and nine month periods~~months ended ~~November 29,~~May 31, 2013 the impairment of the secured debt of Clinton Cards, ~~was adjusted~~ based on ~~current estimated~~updated recovery information provided by the Administrators, was also adjusted, resulting in a gain of ~~$1.8 million and $4.2 million, respectively. See Note 4 for further information.~~

~~In May 2012, the Corporation recorded expenses totaling $2.1 million related to the termination of certain agency agreements associated with its licensing business.~~$2.0 million.

~~During the quarter ended November 29, 2013, the Corporation recognized an impairment loss of $1.9 million associated with its investment in Schurman. See Note 1 for further information.~~

In July 2013, the Corporation recognized a gain totaling $3.3 million related to a cash distribution from Party City. See Note 1 for further information. During the three and nine month periods ended November 29, 2012, the Corporation realized a gain of $1.1 million and $4.3 million, respectively, from the sale of a portion of its investment in Party City.

The changes in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) ~~for the nine months ended November 29, 2013~~ are as follows.


(In thousands)	Foreign Currency Translation Adjustments		Pensions and Other Postretirement Benefits			Unrealized Investment Gain			Total			Foreign Currency Translation Adjustments		Pensions and Other Postretirement Benefits			Unrealized Investment Gain		Total
Balance at February 28, 2013	$	12,594	$	(29,731	)	$	4		$	(17,133	)
Balance at February 28, 2014												$	25,139	$	(24,387	)	$	—	$	752
Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications		8,336		202			(4	)		8,534			1,866		(132	)		—		1,734
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)		—		807			—			807			—		109			—		109

Net current period other comprehensive income (loss)		8,336		1,009			(4	)		9,341			1,866		(23	)		—		1,843

Balance at November 29, 2013	$	20,930	$	(28,722	)	$	—		$	(7,792	)
Balance at May 30, 2014												$	27,005	$	(24,410	)	$	—	$	2,595

The reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) are as follows.


(In thousands)	Nine Months Ended November 29, 2013			Classification on Consolidated Statement of Operations	Three Months Ended May 30, 2014			Consolidated Statement of Income Classification
Amortization of pension and other postretirement benefits items
Amortization of pensions and other postretirement benefits items
Actuarial losses, net	$	(1,919	)	Administrative and general expenses	$	(481	)	Administrative and general expenses
Prior service cost		807		Administrative and general expenses
Prior service credit, net						324		Administrative and general expenses

		(1,112	)			(157	)
Tax benefit		305		Income tax expense		48		Income tax expense

Total, net of tax		(807	)			(109	)


Total reclassifications	$	(807	)		$	(109	)

Trade accounts receivable isare reported net of certain allowances and discounts. The most significant of these are as follows:


(In thousands)	November 29, 2013		February 28, 2013		November 23, 2012		May 30, 2014		February 28, 2014		May 31, 2013
Allowance for seasonal sales returns	$	30,028	$	24,574	$	35,506	$	23,214	$	26,613	$	29,296
Allowance for outdated products		9,848		11,156		11,850		10,313		9,692		11,971
Allowance for doubtful accounts		3,934		3,419		5,670		2,115		2,488		3,443
Allowance for marketing funds		28,416		28,610		29,599		33,027		28,277		27,305
Allowance for rebates		29,191		31,771		30,012		29,236		27,369		30,276

	$	101,417	$	99,530	$	112,637	$	97,905	$	94,439	$	102,291

Certain customer allowances and discounts are settled in cash. These accounts, primarily rebates, which are classified as “Accrued liabilities” on the Consolidated Statement of Financial Position, totaled ~~$15.4~~$14.6 million, ~~$13.5~~$16.5 million and ~~$14.0~~$14.3 million as of ~~November 29, 2013,~~May 30, 2014, February 28, ~~2013~~2014 and ~~November 23, 2012,~~May 31, 2013, respectively.


(In thousands)	November 29, 2013		February 28, 2013		November 23, 2012		May 30, 2014		February 28, 2014		May 31, 2013
Raw materials	$	22,447	$	21,303	$	18,803	$	27,109	$	20,915	$	25,187
Work in process		8,178		6,683		7,051		12,774		8,093		12,843
Finished products		323,204		278,573		302,101		284,415		287,481		265,262

		353,829		306,559		327,955		324,298		316,489		303,292
Less LIFO reserve		85,617		84,166		82,976		82,746		82,140		84,252

		268,212		222,393		244,979		241,552		234,349		219,040
Display materials and factory supplies		23,160		20,054		19,351		18,285		20,412		18,784

	$	291,372	$	242,447	$	264,330	$	259,837	$	254,761	$	237,824

The valuation of inventory under the Last-In, First-Out (“LIFO”) method is made at the end of each fiscal year based on inventory levels and costs at that time. Accordingly, interim LIFO calculations, by necessity, are based on estimates of expected fiscal year-end inventory levels and costs, and are subject to final fiscal year-end LIFO inventory calculations.

Inventory held on location for retailers with scan-based trading arrangements, which is included in finished products, totaled ~~$82.0~~$76.2 million, ~~$59.7~~$66.8 million and ~~$72.5~~$68.6 million as of ~~November 29, 2013,~~May 30, 2014, February 28, 2014 and May 31, 2013, ~~and November 23, 2012,~~ respectively.

Deferred costs and future payment commitments for retail supply agreements are included in the following financial statement captions:


(In thousands)	November 29, 2013			February 28, 2013			November 23, 2012			May 30, 2014			February 28, 2014			May 31, 2013
Prepaid expenses and other	$	103,173		$	93,873		$	98,211		$	93,125		$	100,282		$	88,912
Other assets		301,844			332,159			346,056			420,358			428,090			328,063

Deferred cost assets		405,017			426,032			444,267			513,483			528,372			416,975

Other current liabilities		(64,652	)		(61,282	)		(43,654	)		(81,154	)		(84,860	)		(63,378	)
Other liabilities		(83,100	)		(92,153	)		(124,353	)		(144,762	)		(149,190	)		(91,359	)

Deferred cost liabilities		(147,752	)		(153,435	)		(168,007	)		(225,916	)		(234,050	)		(154,737	)

Net deferred costs	$	257,265		$	272,597		$	276,260		$	287,567		$	294,322		$	262,238

The Corporation maintains an allowance for deferred costs related to supply agreements of ~~$5.6~~$3.6 million, ~~$7.9~~$4.1 million and ~~$7.8~~$7.2 million at ~~November 29, 2013,~~May 30, 2014, February 28, ~~2013~~2014 and ~~November 23, 2012,~~May 31, 2013, respectively. This allowance is included in “Other assets” inon the Consolidated Statement of Financial Position.

~~Debt due within one year totaled $20.0~~As of May 30, 2014, the Corporation was a party to a $600 million ~~as of November 29, 2013,~~senior secured credit agreement, which ~~represented the current maturity of~~provides for a $350 million term loan facility and a $250 million revolving credit facility. The outstanding borrowings under the term ~~loan.~~loan facility were $335.0 million and $340.0 million at May 30, 2014 and February 28, 2014, respectively. There was no ~~debt due within one year as of~~term loan at May 31, 2013. The outstanding borrowings under the revolving credit facility were $66.6 million, $4.5 million and $35.1 million at May 30, 2014, February 28, 2014 and May 31, 2013, ~~and November 23, 2012.~~

~~Long-term debt and their related calendar year due dates as of November 29, 2013, February 28, 2013 and November 23, 2012, respectively, were as follows:~~

respectively. At ~~November 29, 2013,~~May 30, 2014, the balances outstanding on the revolving credit facility and the term loan facility bear interest at a rate of approximately ~~3.2%~~3.1% and 4.0%, respectively. In addition to the balances outstanding on the aforementioned agreements, the Corporation also finances certain transactions with some of its vendors, which include a combination of various guaranties and letters of credit. At November 29, 2013, the Corporation had credit arrangements under a credit facility and an accounts receivable facility (as described below) to support the letters of credit in the amount of $150.0 million with $27.3 million of credit outstanding.

On November 30, 2011, the Corporation closed a public offering of $225.0 million aggregate principal amount of 7.375% senior notes due 2021 (the “2021 Senior Notes”). The net proceeds from this offering were used to finance other existing debt.

The 2021 Senior Notes will mature on December 1, 2021 and bear interest at a fixed rate of 7.375% per year. The 2021 Senior Notes constitute general unsecured senior obligations of the Corporation. The 2021 Senior Notes rank senior in right of payment to all future obligations of the Corporation that are, by their terms, expressly subordinated in right of payment to the 2021 Senior Notes and pari passu in right of payment with all existing and future unsecured obligations of the Corporation that are not so subordinated. The 2021 Senior Notes are effectively

subordinated to secured indebtedness of the Corporation, including borrowings under its revolving credit facility described below, to the extent of the value of the assets securing such indebtedness. The 2021 Senior Notes also contain certain restrictive covenants that are customary for similar credit arrangements, including covenants that limit the Corporation’s ability to incur additional debt; declare or pay dividends; make distributions on or repurchase or redeem capital stock; make certain investments; enter into transactions with affiliates; grant or permit liens; sell assets; enter into sale and leaseback transactions; and consolidate, merge or sell all or substantially all of the Corporation’s assets. These restrictions are subject to customary baskets and financial covenant tests.

The total fair value of the Corporation’s publicly traded debt, which was considered a Level 1 valuation as it was based on quoted market prices, was $228.8 million (at a carrying value of $225.2 million), $233.6 million (at a carrying value of $225.2 million) and $241.9 million (at a carrying value of $225.2 million) at November 29, 2013, February 28, 2013 and November 23, 2012, respectively.

In connection with the closing of the Merger, on August 9, 2013, the Corporation entered into a $600 million secured credit agreement (“Credit Agreement”), which provides for a $350 million term loan facility (“Term Loan Facility”) and a $250 million revolving credit facility (“Revolving Credit Facility”). The Term Loan Facility was fully drawn on August 9, 2013, the closing date (“Closing Date”) of the Merger. The Corporation issued the Term Loan Facility at a discount of $10.8 million. Installment payments will be made on the Term Loan Facility. The first payment of $10 million will be made by February 28, 2014. Thereafter, payments are scheduled to be made quarterly in the amount of $5 million. The Corporation may elect to increase the commitments under each of the Term Loan Facility and the Revolving Credit Facility (together referred to herein as the “Credit Facilities”) up to an aggregate amount of $150 million. The proceeds of the term loans and the revolving loans borrowed on the Closing Date were used to fund a portion of the Merger consideration and pay fees and expenses associated therewith. After the Closing Date, revolving loans borrowed under the Credit Agreement will be used for working capital and general corporate purposes.

The obligations under the Credit Agreement are guaranteed by the Corporation’s Parent and material domestic subsidiaries and secured by substantially all of the assets of the Corporation and the guarantors.

The interest rate per annum applicable to the loans under the Credit Facilities will be, at the Corporation’s election, equal to either (i) the base rate plus the applicable margin or (ii) the relevant adjusted Eurodollar rate for an interest period of one, two, three or six months, at the Corporation’s election, plus the applicable margin.

The Credit Agreement contains certain customary covenants, including covenants that limit the ability of the Corporation, its subsidiaries and the Parent to, among other things, incur or suffer to exist certain liens; make investments; enter into consolidations, mergers, acquisitions and sales of assets; incur or guarantee additional indebtedness; make distributions; enter into agreements that restrict the ability to incur liens or make distributions; and engage in transactions with affiliates. In addition, the Credit Agreement contains financial covenants that require the Corporation to maintain a total leverage ratio and interest coverage ratio in accordance with the limits set forth therein.

The Credit Agreement contains customary events of default including, without limitation, the representations and warranties made in or in connection with the loan documents entered into in connection with the Credit Agreement prove to have been untrue in any material respect when made, the failure to make required payments, the failure to comply with certain agreements or covenants, cross-defaults to certain other indebtedness in excess of specified amounts, certain events of bankruptcy and insolvency, the failure to pay certain judgments and a Change of Control (as defined therein). If such an event of default occurs, the lenders under the Credit Agreement would be entitled to take various actions, including the acceleration of amounts due thereunder and all actions permitted to be taken by a secured creditor.

The Corporation is also a party to an accounts receivable facility that provides funding of up to $50 million, under which there were no borrowings outstanding as of ~~November 29, 2013,~~May 30, 2014, February 28, 2014 and May 31, 2013, ~~and November 23, 2012.~~

~~Under the terms~~respectively. As of ~~the accounts receivable facility,~~May 30, 2014, the Corporation ~~sells accounts receivable to AGC Funding Corporation (a wholly-owned, consolidated subsidiary~~had, in the aggregate, $27.7 million outstanding under letters of credit under these borrowing agreements, which reduces the ~~Corporation), which in turn sells undivided interests in eligible accounts receivable to third party financial institutions as part of a process that provides funding~~total credit available to the Corporation ~~similar to a revolving credit facility.~~thereunder.

~~On August 9, 2013,~~Debt due within one year, which represented the ~~Corporation amended its accounts receivable facility. The amendment modifies the accounts receivable facility by providing for a scheduled termination date that is 364 days following the date~~current maturity of the ~~amendment, subject to two additional, consecutive 364-day terms with the consent~~term loan, totaled $20.0 million as of May 30, 2014 and February 28, 2014. There was no debt due within one year as of May 31, 2013.

Long-term debt and their related calendar year due dates as of May 30, 2014, February 28, 2014 and May 31, 2013, respectively, were as follows:

The total fair value of the parties thereto. The amendment also, among other things, permits the Merger and changes the definition of the base rate to equal the higher of the prime rate as announced by the applicable purchaser financial institution, and the federal funds rate plus 0.50%.

AGC Funding pays an annual facility fee of 80 basis points on the commitment of the accounts receivable securitization facility, together with customary administrative fees on letters of credit that have been issued and on outstanding amounts funded under the facility. Funding under the facility may be used for working capital, general corporate purposes and the issuance of letters of credit.

The accounts receivable facility contains representations, warranties, covenants and indemnities customary for facilities of this type, including the obligation of the Corporation to maintain the same consolidated leverage ratioCorporation’s publicly traded debt, which was considered a Level 1 valuation as it ~~is required to maintain under its Credit Agreement.~~was based on quoted market prices, was $236.4 million (at a carrying value of $225.2 million), $234.7 million (at a carrying value of $225.2 million) and $227.4 million (at a carrying value of $225.2 million) at May 30, 2014, February 28, 2014 and May 31, 2013, respectively.

The total fair value of the Corporation’s non-publicly traded debt, which was considered a Level 2 valuation as it was based on comparable privately traded debt prices, was ~~$427.3~~$401.6 million (at a principal carrying value of $401.6 million), $344.5 million (at a principal carrying value of $344.5 million), and $35.1 million (at a carrying value of ~~$427.3 million), $61.2 million (at a carrying value of $61.2 million) and $131.7 million (at a carrying value of $131.7~~$35.1 million) at ~~November 29, 2013,~~May 30, 2014, February 28, ~~2013~~2014 and ~~November 23, 2012,~~May 31, 2013, respectively.

At ~~November 29, 2013,~~May 30, 2014, the Corporation was in compliance with the financial covenants under its borrowing agreements.

The components of periodic benefit cost for the Corporation’s defined benefit pension and postretirement ~~benefit~~benefits plans are as follows:


	Postretirement Benefits												Defined Benefit Pension Plans						Postretirement Benefits
	Three Months Ended						Nine Months Ended						Three Months Ended						Three Months Ended
(In thousands)	November 29, 2013			November 23, 2012			November 29, 2013			November 23, 2012			May 30, 2014			May 31, 2013			May 30, 2014			May 31, 2013
Service cost	$	48		$	88		$	323		$	513		$	144		$	320		$	100		$	138
Interest cost		572			531			1,797			2,131			1,837			1,742			675			613
Expected return on plan assets		(775	)		(893	)		(2,300	)		(2,573	)		(1,623	)		(1,574	)		(700	)		(763	)
Amortization of prior service credit		(327	)		(519	)		(977	)		(1,557	)
Amortization of actuarial gain		(357	)		(339	)		(782	)		(339	)
Amortization of prior service cost (credit)														1			51			(325	)		(325	)
Amortization of actuarial loss (gain)														706			917			(225	)		(213	)

	$	(839	)	$	(1,132	)	$	(1,939	)	$	(1,825	)	$	1,065		$	1,456		$	(475	)	$	(550	)

The Corporation has a discretionary profit-sharing plan with a 401(k) provision covering most of its United States employees. The profit-sharing plan expense for the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~November 29, 2013~~May 30, 2014 was ~~$4.9~~$4.1 million, compared to ~~$3.9~~$4.0 million in the prior year period. The Corporation also matches a portion of 401(k) employee contributions. The ~~expenses~~expense recognized for the ~~three and nine month periods ended November 29, 2013 were~~401(k) match was $1.3 million ~~and $4.0 million ($2.3 million and $4.9 million for~~in each of the three months ended May 30, 2014 and ~~nine month periods ended November 23, 2012), respectively.~~May 31, 2013. The profit-sharing plan and 401(k) matching expenses for the ~~nine~~three month periods are estimates as actual contributions are determined after fiscal year-end.

At ~~November 29, 2013,~~May 30, 2014, February 28, ~~2013~~2014 and ~~November 23, 2012,~~May 31, 2013, the liability for postretirement benefits other than pensions was ~~$18.6~~$18.7 million, ~~$15.7~~$17.9 million and ~~$28.6~~$16.8 million, respectively, and is included in “Other liabilities” on the Consolidated Statement of Financial Position. At ~~November 29, 2013,~~May 30, 2014, February 28, ~~2013~~2014 and ~~November 23, 2012,~~May 31, 2013, the long-term liability for pension benefits was ~~$81.0~~$76.0 million, ~~$81.4~~$77.3 million and ~~$75.7~~$81.2 million, respectively, and is included in “Other liabilities” on the Consolidated Statement of Financial Position.

Assets and liabilities measured at fair value are classified using the fair value hierarchy based upon the transparency of inputs as of the measurement date. The classification of fair value measurements within the hierarchy is based upon the lowest level of input that is significant to the measurement. The three levels are defined as follows:

The following table summarizes the financial assets ~~and liabilities~~ measured at fair value as of ~~November 29, 2013:~~May 30, 2014:


(In thousands)	November 29, 2013		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		May 30, 2014		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
Assets measured on a recurring basis:
Deferred compensation plan assets	$	12,129	$	8,814	$	3,315	$	—	$	12,218	$	10,243	$	1,975	$	—

Liabilities measured on a recurring basis:
Deferred compensation plan liabilities	$	13,295	$	8,814	$	4,481	$	—	$	13,214	$	10,243	$	2,971	$	—

The following table summarizes the assets and liabilities measured at fair value as of February 28, ~~2013:~~2014:


(In thousands)	February 28, 2013		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		February 28, 2014		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
Assets measured on a recurring basis:
Deferred compensation plan assets	$	10,636	$	9,175	$	1,461	$	—	$	12,285	$	10,289	$	1,996	$	—

Liabilities measured on a recurring basis:
Deferred compensation plan liabilities	$	10,636	$	9,175	$	1,461	$	—	$	13,230	$	10,289	$	2,941	$	—

The following table summarizes the assets and liabilities measured at fair value as of ~~November 23, 2012:~~May 31, 2013:


(In thousands)	November 23, 2012		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		May 31, 2013		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
Assets measured on a recurring basis:
Deferred compensation plan assets	$	10,177	$	8,645	$	1,532	$	—	$	11,104	$	8,683	$	2,421	$	—

Liabilities measured on a recurring basis:
Deferred compensation plan liabilities	$	10,177	$	8,645	$	1,532	$	—	$	11,104	$	8,683	$	2,421	$	—

The deferred compensation plan includes investments in mutual funds and a money market fund. Assets held in mutual funds ~~were~~are recorded at fair value, which ~~was~~is considered a Level 1 valuation as it is based on each fund’s quoted market value per share in an active market. The money market fund ~~was~~is classified as Level 2 as substantially all of the fund’s investments ~~were~~are determined using amortized cost. The fair value of the ~~nonqualified~~ deferred compensation plan liabilities is based on the fair value of: (i) the plan’s assets for invested deferrals and (ii) hypothetical investments for unfunded deferrals resulting from the conversion of ~~memorandum~~deferred restricted stock units to future cash-settled obligations pursuant to the Merger. Prior to the Merger, the assets and related obligation associated with deferred ~~memorandum~~ restricted stock units were carried at cost in equity and offset each other.

The Corporation is presently involved in various judicial, administrative, regulatory and arbitration proceedings concerning matters arising in the ordinary course of business, including but not limited to, employment, commercial disputes and other contractual ~~matters, some of which are described below.~~matters. These matters are inherently subject to many uncertainties regarding the possibility of a loss to the Corporation. These uncertainties will ultimately be resolved when one or more future events occur or fail to occur, confirming the incurrence of a liability or reduction of a liability. In accordance with ASC Topic 450, “Contingencies,” the Corporation accrues for these contingencies by a charge to income when it is both probable that one or more future events will occur confirming the fact of a loss and the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated. Due to this uncertainty, the actual amount of any loss may ultimately prove to be larger or smaller than the amounts reflected in the Corporation’s Consolidated Financial Statements. Some of these proceedings are at preliminary stages and some of these cases seek an indeterminate amount of damages.

American Greetings Corporation is a defendant in two putative class action lawsuits involving corporate-owned life insurance policies (the “Insurance Policies”): one filed in the Northern District of Ohio on January 11, 2012 by Theresa Baker as the personal representative of the estate of Richard Charles Wolfe (the “Baker Litigation”); and the other filed in the Northern District of Oklahoma on October 1, 2010 by Keith Collier as the personal representative of the estate of Ruthie Collier (the “Collier Litigation”).

interest in Mr. Wolfe’s life. The plaintiff seeks damages in the amount of all pecuniary benefits associated with the subject Insurance Policies, including investment returns, interest and life insurance policy benefits that American Greetings Corporation received from the deaths of the former employees whose estates form the putative class.

In the Collier Litigation, the plaintiff claims that American Greetings Corporation did not have an insurable interest when it obtained the subject Insurance Policies and wrongfully received the benefits from those policies. The plaintiff seeks damages in the amount of policy benefits received by American Greetings Corporation from the subject Insurance Policies, as well as attorney’s fees, costs and interest. On April 2, 2012, the plaintiff filed its First Amended Complaint, adding misappropriation of employee information and breach of fiduciary duty claims as well as seeking punitive damages. On April 20, 2012, American Greetings Corporation moved to transfer the Collier Litigation to the Northern District of Ohio, where the Baker Litigation is pending. On July 6, 2012, the Court granted American Greetings Corporation’s Motion to Transfer and transferred the case to the Northern District of Ohio, where the Baker Litigation is pending.

On May 22, 2013, the Court preliminarily approved a full and final settlement of all the claims of the Wolfe and Collier estates, as well as the classes they seek to represent. As a result of the preliminary approval, the Court consolidated the two cases and certified a single class that consists of the heirs or estates of the estates and heirs of all former American Greetings Corporation employees (i) who are deceased; (ii) who were not officers or directors of American Greetings Corporation; (iii) who were insured under one of the following corporate-owned life insurance plans: Provident Life & Accident 61153, Provident Life & Accident 61159, Mutual Benefit Life Insurance Company 111, Connecticut General ENX219, and Hartford Life Insurance Company 361; and (iv) for whom American Greetings Corporation has received a death benefit on or before the date on which the Court enters the Order of Preliminary Approval. Required notices to potential class members and to state attorney generals as required under the Class Action Fairness Act of 2005 were mailed on May 30, 2013. On September 20, 2013, the Court entered a final order approving the settlement in the amount of $12.5 million. This amount was accrued prior to the first quarter of 2014. One half of the settlement amount was deposited by American Greetings Corporation into a settlement fund account on September 27, 2013, and the remaining half of the settlement amount was deposited by American Greetings Corporation into the same settlement fund account on November 12, 2013. The settlement fund will be distributed in its entirety to those members of the class who present valid claims, their counsel, and a settlement administration vendor.

On September 26, 2012, we announced that our Board of Directors received a non-binding proposal from Zev Weiss, the Corporation’s Chief Executive Officer, and Jeffrey Weiss, the Corporation’s President and Chief Operating Officer, on behalf of themselves and certain other members of the Weiss family and related parties to acquire all of the outstanding Class A common shares and Class B common shares of the Corporation not currently owned by them (the “Going Private Proposal”). On September 27, 2012, Dolores Carter, a purported shareholder, filed a putative shareholder derivative and class action lawsuit (the “Carter Action”) in the Court of Common Pleas in Cuyahoga County, Ohio (the “Cuyahoga County Court”), against American Greetings Corporation and all of the members of the Board of Directors. The Carter Action alleges, among other things, that the directors of the Corporation breached their fiduciary duties owed to shareholders in evaluating and pursuing the proposal. The Carter Action further alleges claims for aiding and abetting breaches of fiduciary duty. Among other things, the Carter Action seeks declaratory relief. Subsequently, six more lawsuits were filed in the Cuyahoga County Court purporting to advance substantially similar claims on behalf of American Greetings Corporation against the members of the Board of Directors and, in certain cases, additional direct claims against American Greetings Corporation. One lawsuit was voluntarily dismissed. The other lawsuits were consolidated by Judge Richard J. McMonagle on December 6, 2012 (amended order dated December 18, 2012) as In re American Greetings Corp. Shareholder Litigation, Lead Case No. CV 12 792421 (the “State Court Action”). Lead plaintiffs and lead plaintiffs’ counsel also were appointed.

necessary to permit the Corporation’s shareholders to determine if the Merger is in their best interest, that the controlling shareholders have abused their control of the Corporation, that the special committee appointed to oversee the transaction is not independent, and that the other members of the Board of Directors are also not independent. On June 13, 2013, defendants filed motions to dismiss the Consolidated Class Action Complaint based on plaintiffs’ failure to properly plead their claims as derivative actions, to exercise their statutory appraisal rights as the sole remedy for dissatisfaction with the proposed share price, and to overcome the business judgment rule with respect to their breach of fiduciary duty claims. The motions remain pending.

On July 16, 2013, the parties entered into a Memorandum of Understanding (“MOU”) agreeing in principle to settle the State Court Action on behalf of themselves and the putative settlement class, which includes all persons who owned any interest in the common stock of American Greetings Corporation (either of record or beneficially) at any time between and including September 26, 2012 and the effective date of the Merger. A Stipulation of Settlement subsequently was filed with the Cuyahoga County Court on August 8, 2013, and the Cuyahoga County Court preliminarily approved the settlement on August 15, 2013 (amended order dated September 4, 2013). The settlement provides for dismissal with prejudice of the State Court Action and a release of claims against defendants and released parties. As consideration to class members, the Corporation agreed to and did disclose additional information via a Form 8-K relating to the Merger, which was filed with the SEC on July 18, 2013. In addition, defendants acknowledge that the State Court Action contributed to the Weiss family shareholders’ decision to increase the Merger consideration from $18.20 per share to $19.00 per share. The settlement also contemplates the payment of attorneys’ fees and reimbursement of expenses to class counsel, which the Corporation expects will be fully paid by the Corporation’s insurer.

The settlement is conditioned upon, among other things, final certification of the settlement class and final approval of the proposed settlement by the Cuyahoga County Court. On December 12, 2013, the Cuyahoga County Court granted Plaintiff’s Motion for Final Approval of the Settlement.

On November 6, 2012, R. David Wolfe, a purported shareholder, filed a putative class action (the “Wolfe Action”) in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio (the “Federal Court”) against certain members of the Weiss Family and the Irving I. Stone Oversight Trust, the Irving Stone Limited Liability Company, the Irving I. Stone Support Foundation, and the Irving I. Stone Foundation (“Stone Entities”) alleging breach of fiduciary duties in proposing and pursuing the proposal, as well as against American Greetings, seeking, among other things, declaratory relief. Shortly thereafter, on November 9, 2012, the Louisiana Municipal Police Employees’ Retirement System also filed a purported class action in the Federal Court (the “LMPERS Action”) asserting substantially similar claims against the same defendants and seeking substantially similar relief.

On November 30, 2012, plaintiffs in the Wolfe and LMPERS Actions filed motions (1) to consolidate the Wolfe and LMPERS Actions, (2) for appointment as co-lead plaintiffs, (3) for appointment of co-lead counsel, and, in the Wolfe Action only, (4) for partial summary judgment. On December 14, 2012, the Corporation filed its oppositions to the motions (a) to consolidate the Wolfe and LMPERS Actions, (b) for appointment as co-lead plaintiffs, and (c) for appointment of co-lead counsel. On the same day, the Corporation also moved to dismiss both the Wolfe and LMPERS Actions. The Corporation answered both complaints on January 8, 2013, and on January 11, 2013, it filed its opposition to the motion for partial summary judgment. On February 14, 2013, the Federal Court dismissed both the Wolfe and LMPERS Actions for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. On March 15, 2013, plaintiffs in both the Wolfe and LMPERS Actions filed notices of appeal with the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals. On April 18, 2013, plaintiff Wolfe moved to dismiss his appeal, which motion was granted on April 19, 2013. On May 8, 2013, plaintiff LMPERS’s moved to dismiss its appeal as well, which motion was granted.

Plaintiffs in the Wolfe and LMPERS Actions alleged, in part, that Article Seventh of the Corporation’s articles of incorporation prohibited the special committee from, among other things, evaluating the Merger. The Corporation considered these allegations and concluded that the Article is co-extensive with Ohio law and thus allows the Corporation to engage in any activity authorized by Ohio law. The Corporation also has consistently construed Article Seventh as permitting directors to approve a transaction so long as they are both disinterested and independent.

On April 17, 2013, R. David Wolfe filed a new derivative and putative class action (“Wolfe Action II”) in the Federal Court against the Corporation’s directors, certain members of the Weiss Family, and the Stone Entities, as well as the Corporation as a nominal defendant, challenging the Merger as financially and procedurally unfair to the Corporation and its minority shareholders. Mr. Wolfe subsequently filed an Amended Complaint on April 29, 2013. The Wolfe Action II sought a declaratory judgment that Article Seventh precludes the Board of Directors and special committee from approving the Merger. In addition, the Wolfe Action II included a derivative claim for breach of fiduciary duty against the Corporation’s directors for allegedly violating Article Seventh. Finally, the Wolfe Action II included both a derivative and class action claim for breach of fiduciary duty against the Weiss Family defendants and the Stone Entities for allegedly seeking to acquire the minority shareholders’ interests at an unfair price. Defendants filed their Motions to Dismiss the Wolfe Action II amended Complaint on July 8, 2013. On August 1, 2013, the Federal Court granted the parties’ joint motion to defer briefings on defendants’ motions to dismiss and to stay the action pending resolution of the settlement of the State Court Action. Given the entry of Final Approval of the settlement of the State Court Action, the parties filed a Stipulation and Dismissal of the Wolfe Action II on December 23, 2013. The Federal Court entered the Dismissal of the Wolfe Action II on the same date.

In addition to the foregoing, we are involved in various judicial, administrative, regulatory and arbitration proceedings concerning matters arising in the ordinary course of business operations, including, but not limited to, employment, commercial disputes and other contractual matters. We, however, do not believe that any of the litigation in which we are currently engaged, either individually or in the aggregate, will have a material adverse effect on our business, consolidated financial position or results of operations.

The Corporation’s provision for income taxes in interim periods is computed by applying its estimated annual effective tax rate against income ~~(loss)~~ before income tax expense ~~(benefit)~~ for the period. In addition, non-recurring or discrete items are recorded during the period in which they occur. The magnitude of the impact that discrete items have on the Corporation’s quarterly effective tax rate is dependent on the level of income in the period. The effective tax rate was ~~8.6%~~21.1% and ~~49.1%~~36.4% for the three month periods ended May 30, 2014 and ~~nine months ended November 29,~~May 31, 2013, ~~respectively, and 61.5% and 2.8% for the three and nine months ended November 23, 2012,~~ respectively. The lower than statutory rate for the three months ended November 29, 2013 is due primarily to the release of reserves upon lapse of the applicable statutes and related to positions that have been effectively settled under audit. The higher than statutory rate for the nine months ended November 29, 2013 isMay 30, 2014 was due primarily to the recording of ~~an $8.0~~a net $3.1 million federal tax refund and related interest attributable to fiscal 2000 and the error corrections recorded in accordance with ASC Topic 250, Accounting Changes and Error Corrections. The net impact of the error corrections was a reduction to income tax expense of $4.1 million. During the three months ended May 30, 2014, the Corporation identified and corrected errors in the accounting for income taxes that related to the year ended February 28, 2014. These errors primarily related to the Corporation’s failure to consider all sources of available taxable income when assessing the need for a valuation allowance against certain ~~net operating loss~~deferred tax assets and ~~foreign~~the recognition of a liability for an uncertain tax ~~credit carryforwards which~~position. These errors were the ~~Corporation believes will expire unused. The valuation allowance was recorded in accordance with Internal Revenue Code section 382 and 383 due to~~result of the significant complexity created as a result of the Merger ~~as previously disclosed~~and related transactions in fiscal 2014. See Note ~~3. The lower than statutory rate~~1 for ~~the nine months ended November 23, 2012 is due primarily to the release of reserves upon lapse of the applicable statutes and lower taxable income.~~further information.

At ~~November 29, 2013,~~May 30, 2014, the Corporation had unrecognized tax benefits of ~~$19.8~~$21.4 million that, if recognized, would have a favorable effect on the Corporation’s income tax expense of ~~$16.8~~$18.5 million. During the ~~third~~first quarter of ~~2014,~~2015, the Corporation’s unrecognized tax benefits ~~decreased $1.9~~increased $2.4 million ~~due~~as a result of the error correction related to the ~~release of reserves upon expiration of the applicable statutes and positions that have been effectively settled under audit.~~uncertain tax position as discussed above. It is reasonably

possible that the Corporation’s unrecognized tax positions as of ~~November 29, 2013~~May 30, 2014 could decrease ~~$3.1~~$2.9 million during the next twelve months due to anticipated settlements and resulting cash payments related to open years after ~~1996,~~1998, which are currently under examination.

The Corporation recognizes interest and penalties accrued on unrecognized tax benefits and refundable income taxes as a component of income tax expense. During the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~November 29, 2013,~~May 30, 2014, the ~~Corporation’s~~Corporation recognized a net ~~expense netted to zero related to~~benefit of $1.9 million for interest and penalties on unrecognized tax benefits and refundable income taxes. As of ~~November 29, 2013,~~May 30, 2014, the total amount of gross accrued interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits less refundable income taxes was a net payable of ~~$4.5~~$2.4 million.

The Corporation is subject to examination by the ~~Internal Revenue Service~~IRS for tax years 2010 to the present and various U.S. state and local jurisdictions for tax years ~~1996~~1998 to the present. The Corporation is also subject to tax examination in various international tax jurisdictions, including ~~Australia,~~ Canada, ~~New Zealand and~~ the United Kingdom, Australia, Italy, Mexico and New Zealand for tax years 2006 to the present.

In May 2011, the Corporation announced that it will be relocating its world headquarters to a new location in the City of Westlake, Ohio, in a mixed-use development known as Crocker Park (the “Crocker Park Development”), which offers a vibrant urban setting, with retail stores and restaurants, offices and apartments. After putting the project on hold pending the outcome of the proposal to go private, the Corporation announced plans in October 2013 to resume the project and, on March 26, 2014, the Corporation purchased from Crocker Park, LLC, the owner of the Crocker Park Development, 14.48 acres of land at the south end of the Crocker Park Development (the “Crocker Park Site”) on which the new world headquarters will be built. The purchase price for the land was $7.4 million (based on a per acre price of $510 thousand). Morry Weiss, the Chairman of the board of the Corporation, Zev Weiss and Jeffrey Weiss, the Co-Chief Executive Officers of the Corporation, and Gary and Elie Weiss, directors and non-executive officers of the Corporation, together with members of their family (collectively, the “Weiss Family”), indirectly own a minority stake in Crocker Park, LLC through their indirect ownership of approximately 37% of the membership interests in Crocker Park, LLC. In addition, Morry Weiss and other members of the Weiss Family have guaranteed certain of Crocker Park, LLC’s obligations, and are expected to guarantee additional obligations of Crocker Park, LLC, incurred in connection with the Crocker Park Development. The authority to conduct, manage and control the business of Crocker Park, LLC, including operating the Crocker Park Development and the decision whether to sell the Crocker Park Site to American Greetings, was reserved to the manager of Crocker Park, LLC, who is not an affiliate of the Weiss Family and that is an affiliate of Stark Enterprises, Inc.

The Corporation is leasing a portion of the Crocker Park Site to H L & L Property Company, a Delaware corporation and indirect affiliate of American Greetings indirectly owned by members of the Weiss family (“H L & L”), that will construct the new world headquarters on the Crocker Park Site and sublease the new world headquarters back to the Corporation. The Corporation has also entered into an operating lease with H L & L for the use of the new world headquarters building, anticipated to be available for occupancy in approximately two years. Due to the common ownership of the Corporation and H L & L, along with the nature of the arrangement, the Corporation is required to be treated, for accounting purpose only, as the “deemed owner” of the new world headquarters building. Accordingly, the Corporation will record an asset and associated offsetting liability during the construction of the building, even though the Corporation does not own the asset and is not the obligor on the corresponding construction debt. At May 30, 2014, the balance of the asset and corresponding liability was $0.9 million. Please refer to the Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended February 28, 2014 for a description of the transactions associated with the World headquarters relocation.

From time to time employees of the Corporation may provide services to its parent companies as well as companies that are owned or controlled by members of the Weiss family, in each case provided that such services do not

interfere with the Corporation’s employees’ ability to perform services on its behalf. When providing such services, the affiliated companies reimburse the Corporation for such services, based on the costs of employing the individual (including salary and benefits) and the amount of time spent by such employee in providing services to the affiliated company.

The Corporation has North American Social Expression Products, International Social Expression Products, Retail Operations, AG Interactive and non-reportable segments. The North American Social Expression Products and International Social Expression Products segments primarily design, manufacture and sell greeting cards and other related products through various channels of distribution with mass merchandising as the primary channel. At ~~November 29, 2013,~~May 30, 2014, the Retail Operations segment operated ~~403~~400 card and gift retail stores in the United Kingdom. The stores sell products purchased from the International Social Expression Products segment as well as products purchased from other vendors. AG Interactive distributes social expression products, including electronic greetings and a broad range of graphics and digital services and products, through a variety of electronic channels, including Web sites, Internet portals ~~instant messaging services~~ and electronic mobile devices. The Corporation’s non-reportable operating segments primarily include licensing activities and the design, manufacture and sale of display fixtures.


	Three Months Ended						Nine Months Ended
(In thousands)	November 29, 2013			November 23, 2012			November 29, 2013			November 23, 2012			Three Months Ended
													May 30, 2014			May 31, 2013
Total Revenue:

North American Social Expression Products	$	342,185		$	333,852		$	932,166		$	908,267		$	329,057		$	328,287

International Social Expression Products		94,639			101,972			228,812			239,486			75,039			70,801
Intersegment items		(24,200	)		(25,538	)		(44,029	)		(39,080	)		(10,065	)		(11,092	)

Net		70,439			76,434			184,783			200,406			64,974			59,709

Retail Operations		64,875			67,635			202,325			107,519			79,164			74,718

AG Interactive		15,935			15,982			45,139			47,255			14,499			14,700

Non-reportable segments		14,082			12,911			60,827			30,309
Non-reportable segment														15,890			19,889

	$	507,516		$	506,814		$	1,425,240		$	1,293,756		$	503,584		$	497,303

   Three Months Ended Nine Months Ended
(In thousands)    November 29,
2013 November 23,
2012 November 29,
2013 November 23,
2012
Segment Earnings (Loss):

North American Social Expression Products
   $ 22,894    $ 22,099    $ 124,286    $ 98,757
International Social Expression Products
   8,539    3,413    13,278    (18,855 )
Intersegment items
   (2,297 ) (4,123 ) (6,022 ) (11,525 )


Net
   6,242    (710 ) 7,256    (30,380 )
Retail Operations
   (12,825 ) (11,473 ) (25,261 ) (16,579 )
AG Interactive
   3,477    5,331    9,955    13,713
Non-reportable segments
   5,710    3,259    23,151    5,501
Unallocated

Interest expense
   (8,454 ) (4,504 ) (18,199 ) (13,314 )
Profit-sharing plan expense
   (407 ) (423 ) (4,872 ) (3,852 )
Stock-based compensation expense
   —      (2,965 ) (13,596 ) (7,806 )
Corporate overhead expense
   (13,022 ) (12,713 ) (40,877 ) (43,790 )


   (21,883 ) (20,605 ) (77,544 ) (68,762 )


   $ 3,615    $ (2,099 ) $ 61,843    $ 2,250

For the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~November 29,~~May 31, 2013, stock-based compensation in the table above includes non-cash stock-based compensation prior to the Merger and the impact of the settlement of stock options and the cancellation or modification of outstanding restricted stock units and performance shares concurrent with the Merger, a portion of which is non-cash.Merger. There is no stock-based compensation subsequent to the Merger as these plans were converted into cash compensation plans at the time of the Merger. ~~See Note 3 for further information.~~

“Corporate overhead expense” includes costs associated with corporate operations including, among other costs, senior management, corporate finance, legal, and insurance programs.

~~Refer to Note 4 for segment information related to certain~~In the prior year ~~charges associated with activities and transactions in connection with~~first quarter, the ~~acquisition~~Corporation’s Unallocated segment included approximately $4.5 million of ~~Clinton Cards that do not have comparative amounts in the current year; and to Note 3 for current year charges~~non-recurring transaction costs associated with the ~~Merger that do not have comparative amounts in the prior year.~~Merger.

Termination benefits are primarily considered part of an ongoing benefit arrangement, accounted for in accordance with ASC Topic 712, “Compensation – Nonretirement Postemployment Benefits,” and are recorded when payment of the benefits is probable and can be reasonably estimated.

The balance of the severance accrual was ~~$2.5~~$3.9 million, ~~$6.0~~$4.0 million and ~~$4.7~~$4.5 million at ~~November 29, 2013,~~May 30, 2014, February 28, ~~2013~~2014 and ~~November 23, 2012,~~May 31, 2013, respectively. The payments expected within the next twelve months are included in “Accrued liabilities” while the remaining payments beyond the next twelve months are included in “Other liabilities” on the Consolidated Statement of Financial Position.

Subsequent to quarter end, on July 1, 2014, the Corporation sold its current world headquarters location and entered into an operating lease arrangement with the new owner of the building. The Corporation expects to remain in this current location until the completion of the new world headquarters, which the Corporation anticipates will occur in approximately two years. Net of transaction costs, the Corporation received approximately $13.5 million cash from the sale, and expects to record a non-cash loss on disposal of approximately $14 million to $16 million during our second fiscal quarter.

On June 13, 2014, the Corporation paid a cash dividend in the aggregate amount of $9.9 million to Century Intermediate Holding Company, its parent and sole shareholder. In addition, H L & L paid $9.9 million to the Corporation to acquire certain assets previously purchased by Corporation related to the new world headquarters project.

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

This Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations should be read in conjunction with our unaudited consolidated financial statements. This discussion and analysis, and other statements made in this Report, contain forward-looking ~~statements, see~~statements. See “Factors That May Affect Future Results” at the end of this discussion and analysis for a description of the uncertainties, risks and assumptions associated with these statements. Unless otherwise indicated or the context otherwise requires, the “Corporation,” “we,” “our,” “us” and “American Greetings” are used in this Report to refer to the businesses of American Greetings Corporation and its consolidated subsidiaries.

~~On September 26, 2012, we announced that our Board~~Total revenue for the current year first quarter was $503.6 million, an increase of Directors received a non-binding proposal from Zev Weiss, the Corporation’s then Chief Executive Officer, and Jeffrey Weiss, the Corporation’s then President and Chief Operating Officer, on behalf of themselves and certain other members of the Weiss family and related parties to acquire all of the outstanding Class A common shares and Class B common shares of the Corporation not currently owned by them (the “Going Private Proposal”). In connection with the Going Private Proposal, on March 29, 2013, we signed an agreement and plan of merger (as amended on July 3, 2013, the “Merger Agreement”), among the Corporation, Century Intermediate Holding Company, a Delaware corporation (“Parent”), and Century Merger Company, an Ohio corporation and a wholly-owned subsidiary of Parent (“Merger Sub”). At a special meeting of shareholders held on August 7, 2013, the shareholders of the Corporation voted to adopt the Merger Agreement, and the merger contemplated thereby (the “Merger”). On August 9, 2013, the Corporation completed the Merger. As a result of the Merger, the Corporation is now wholly owned by Parent, which is indirectly owned by Morry Weiss, the Chairman of the Board of the Corporation, Zev Weiss, Jeffrey Weiss and certain other members of the Weiss family and related entities (the “Family Shareholders”). At the effective time of the Merger, each issued and outstanding share of the Corporation (other than shares owned by the Corporation, Parent (which at the effective time of the Merger included all shares previously held by the Family Shareholders) or Merger Sub) was converted into the right to receive $19.00 per share in cash. All other shares of the Corporation were cancelled without consideration.

~~Net sales in the third quarter increased $2.7~~approximately $6.3 million, or ~~0.5%~~1.3% compared to the prior year period. ~~Increased net~~This improvement was primarily the result of increased sales of greeting cards ~~gift packaging products, party goods~~ and ~~fixtures~~the impact of favorable foreign currency movements. These improvements were partially offset by lower ~~net sales in~~revenues from our ~~retail~~fixtures business, gift packaging products and ~~the unfavorable impact of foreign currency translation.~~party goods.

~~Third~~First quarter operating income was ~~$13.1~~$63.2 million, ~~compared to $0.2 million in the prior year period,~~ an increase of $12.9 million. This improvement was primarily due to lower expenses associated with marketing, legal, retail operations, and our information systems refresh project, partially offset by higher variable compensation expense compared to the prior year period. Gross margin dollars were flat compared to the prior year quarter.

~~Net sales in the nine month period ended November 29, 2013 increased $131.2~~approximately $7.8 million, or 14.2% compared to the prior year period. The increase was driven by the prior year second quarter acquisition of certain assets of Clinton Cards PLC (“Clinton Cards”) and an unusually large contract in the fixtures business. The increase in net sales due to Clinton Cards was approximately $100 million and the fixtures business added about $32 million. During the current year first quarter, our fixtures business obtained a contract to supply fixtures to a large consumer electronics company. This contract, which was completed in the second quarter, contributed approximately $26 million of net sales during the year. The fixtures business is included in the Non-reportable section of our segment reporting.

Due to our fiscal calendar cycle, the current year nine month period ended on November 29, 2013, compared to November 23, 2012 in the prior year. This difference in fiscal quarter cut-off dates equates to six additional days, or 2.2% more selling days in the current year nine months. This timing did not significantly impact the third quarter results and is not expected to impact the full year results, but will result in fewer selling days in the current year fourth quarter compared to the prior year fourth quarter. We estimate that the additional six days equates to approximately $18 million of net sales, primarily greeting cards.

In addition, net sales in the nine month period ended November 29, 2013 were unfavorably impacted by foreign currency translation and lower sales of greeting cards and other ancillary products, which in total decreased net sales approximately $19 million compared to the prior year nine month period.

Operating income in the nine months ended November 29, 2013 was $75.5 million compared to $8.4 million in the prior year period, an improvement of approximately $67 million. The prior year period included costs of $37.5 million related to the Clinton Cards acquisition and approximately $2 million of costs related to the Merger. The nine months ended November 29, 2013 included approximately $28 million of costs related to the Merger and a gain of approximately $4 million related to the Clinton’s acquisition. The remaining improvement was driven ~~by the~~within our International Social Expression Products segment due to higher revenue and lower supply chain costs; and within our North American Social Expression Products segment due primarily to ~~higher net sales~~cost savings initiatives. The current year included the unfavorable impact of approximately $3 million related to scan-based trading (“SBT”) implementations which was about flat compared to the prior year. The prior year included approximately $5 million of costs related to the going private transaction.

Subsequent to quarter end, on July 1, 2014, we sold our current world headquarters location and ~~lower spending~~entered into an operating lease arrangement with the new owner of the building. We expect to remain in our current location until the completion of our new world headquarters, which we anticipate will occur in approximately two years. Net of transaction costs, we received approximately $13.5 million cash from the sale, and expect to record a non-cash loss on ~~marketing and the information systems refresh project, the fixtures business due~~disposal of approximately $14 million to ~~higher sales, and the International Social Expression Products segment due to favorable product mix, lower supply chain and scrap expense, and other costs savings.~~$16 million during our second fiscal quarter.

Three months ended ~~November 29,~~May 30, 2014 and May 31, 2013 ~~and November 23, 2012~~

Net income was ~~$3.3~~$43.7 million in the ~~third~~first quarter compared to ~~net loss of $0.8~~$33.4 million in the prior year ~~third~~first quarter.

Our results for the three months ended ~~November 29,~~May 30, 2014 and May 31, 2013 ~~and November 23, 2012~~ are summarized below:


(Dollars in thousands)	2013			% Total Revenue			2012			% Total Revenue			2014			% Total Revenue			2013			% Total Revenue
Net sales	$	502,107			98.9	%	$	499,368			98.5	%	$	497,274			98.7	%	$	490,545			98.6	%
Other revenue		5,409			1.1	%		7,446			1.5	%		6,310			1.3	%		6,758			1.4	%

Total revenue		507,516			100.0	%		506,814			100.0	%		503,584			100.0	%		497,303			100.0	%

Material, labor and other production costs		244,829			48.2	%		244,071			48.2	%		200,786			39.9	%		203,837			41.0	%
Selling, distribution and marketing expenses		177,154			34.9	%		190,041			37.5	%		172,259			34.2	%		170,339			34.3	%
Administrative and general expenses		74,814			14.7	%		74,483			14.7	%		69,295			13.8	%		71,080			14.3	%
Other operating income – net		(2,368	)		(0.4	%)		(1,977	)		(0.4	%)		(1,968	)		(0.4	%)		(3,318	)		(0.7	%)

Operating income		13,087			2.6	%		196			0.0	%		63,212			12.5	%		55,365			11.1	%

Interest expense		8,454			1.7	%		4,504			0.9	%		8,994			1.8	%		4,312			0.9	%
Interest income		(29	)		(0.0	%)		(65	)		(0.0	%)		(111	)		(0.0	%)		(120	)		(0.0	%)
Other non-operating expense (income) – net		1,047			0.2	%		(2,144	)		(0.4	%)
Other non-operating income – net														(1,107	)		(0.3	%)		(1,373	)		(0.3	%)

Income (loss) before income tax expense (benefit)		3,615			0.7	%		(2,099	)		(0.4	%)
Income tax expense (benefit)		310			0.0	%		(1,290	)		(0.3	%)
Income before income tax expense														55,436			11.0	%		52,546			10.5	%
Income tax expense														11,697			2.3	%		19,153			3.8	%

Net income (loss)	$	3,305			0.7	%	$	(809	)		(0.2	%)
Net income													$	43,739			8.7	%	$	33,393			6.7	%

For the three months ended ~~November 29, 2013,~~May 30, 2014, consolidated net sales were ~~$502.1~~$497.3 million, ~~an increase of $2.7 million, or 0.5%,~~up from ~~$499.4~~$490.5 million in the prior year ~~third~~first quarter. ~~The~~This 1.4%, or approximately $7 million, increase was ~~primarily related to increases in~~driven by higher sales of greeting cards of approximately $9 million and the favorable impact of foreign currency of approximately $7 million. These increases were partially offset by lower sales in our fixtures business of approximately $4 million, decreased sales of other ancillary products of approximately $3 million and lower sales of gift packaging and party goods of approximately ~~$4 million, $4 million and~~ $2 million, respectively. In addition, net sales in our fixtures business increased by approximately $3 million. These increases were partially offset by decreases in sales of other ancillary products and sales through our retail stores of approximately $3 million each. Foreign currency translation had an unfavorable impact on net sales for the quarter ended November 29, 2013 of approximately $4 million.

Other revenue, primarily royalty revenue from our Strawberry Shortcake and Care Bears properties, decreased ~~$2.0~~$0.4 million during the three months ended ~~November 29, 2013 compared to the prior year third quarter.~~May 30, 2014.

Unit and pricing comparatives (on a sales less returns basis) for the three months ended ~~November 29,~~May 30, 2014 and May 31, 2013 ~~and November 23, 2012~~ are summarized below:


	Increase (Decrease) From the Prior Year																		Increase (Decrease) From the Prior Year
	Everyday Cards						Seasonal Cards						Total Greeting Cards						Everyday Cards						Seasonal Cards						Total Greeting Cards
	2013			2012			2013			2012			2013			2012			2014			2013			2014			2013			2014			2013
Unit volume		(4.5	%)		(0.7	%)		8.2	%		(4.1	%)		(1.7	%)		(1.4	%)		(3.9	%)		6.4	%		6.9	%		2.0	%		(0.3	%)		4.8	%
Selling prices		2.5	%		1.6	%		0.0	%		(1.4	%)		1.9	%		0.8	%		5.5	%		3.8	%		(1.5	%)		3.6	%		3.2	%		3.5	%
Overall increase / (decrease)		(2.1	%)		0.9	%		8.2	%		(5.5	%)		0.2	%		(0.7	%)		1.4	%		10.4	%		5.4	%		5.6	%		2.9	%		8.5	%

During the ~~third~~first quarter, combined everyday and seasonal greeting card sales less returns increased ~~0.2%~~2.9% compared to the prior year quarter, ~~including an increase~~as a result of increases in selling prices of ~~1.9%,~~3.2% partially offset by a decrease in unit volume of ~~1.7%~~0.3%. The overall increase was driven by selling price increases of everyday cards within our North American Social Expression Products segment and unit volume improvement of seasonal cards in both our North American Social Expression Products and our International Social Expression Products segments. These increases were substantially offset by the decrease in unit volume of everyday greeting cards in both our North American Social Expression Products and our International Social Expression Products segments.

Everyday card sales less returns for the third quarter decreased 2.1% compared to the prior year period due to unit decline of 4.5% partially offset by improvement in selling prices of 2.5%. The unit volume decline in the North American Social Expression Products segment was primarily driven by generally soft sales across most distribution channels and in the International Social Expression Products segment primarily due to lower sales to our Retail Operations segment. The selling price improvement was driven by our North American Social Expression Products segment.

Seasonal card sales less returns increased 8.2% during the third quarter compared to the prior year period, driven by an 8.2% increase in unit volume. The increase in unit volume during the current year quarter was partially driven by our Christmas programs in both our North American Social Expression Products and our International Social Expression Products segments due to year-over-year timing of seasonal shipments. Also contributing to the unit volume improvement was our Fall seasonal program within the North American Social Expression Products segment.

Material, labor and other production costs (“MLOPC”) for the three months ended November 29, 2013 were $244.8 million, compared to $244.1 million in the prior year three months, an increase of $0.7 million. As a percentage of total revenue, these costs were 48.2% in both periods. The $0.7 million increase was driven by an unfavorable volume variance of approximately $2 million due to the impact of higher sales in the current year third quarter, partially offset by the favorable impact of foreign currency translation of approximately $1 million. In addition, higher product content costs of approximately $3 million were offset by lower scrap expense of approximately $3 million.

Selling, distribution and marketing (“SDM”) expenses for the three months ended November 29, 2013 were $177.2 million compared to $190.0 million in the prior year third quarter, a decrease of $12.8 million. The decrease was driven primarily by lower marketing and product management expenses of approximately $10 million and a decrease in operating costs related to our retail stores of approximately $4 million. Partially offsetting these decreases were higher supply chain costs of approximately $1 million.

Administrative and general expenses were $74.8 million for the three months ended November 29, 2013, a slight increase from $74.5 million for the three months ended November 23, 2012. The current year quarter includes approximately $11 million of higher variable compensation expense related to a combination of an adjustment to the current year expected variable compensation program payout and the establishment during the current quarter of a

long-term incentive program to replace the prior stock-based compensation programs. The adjustment to the current year variable compensation program was necessary as it is probable, based on current year-to-date operating results, that we will exceed previously established performance targets. These amounts were substantially offset by lower legal expense of approximately $5 million, a decrease in costs related to our information technology systems refresh project of approximately $3 million, a decrease in costs related to the Going Private Proposal and Merger of approximately $1 million and other general cost savings, of which no items were individually significant, of approximately $2 million.

Other operating income – net was $2.4 million for the three months ended November 29, 2013 compared to $2.0 million for the prior year third quarter. In the current year third quarter, based on updated estimated recovery information provided in connection with the Clinton Cards bankruptcy administration, we recorded an adjustment to the Clinton Cards debt impairment resulting in a gain of $1.8 million.

Other non-operating expense (income) – net was $1.0 million of expense for the three months ended November 29, 2013 compared to $2.1 million of income for the three months ended November 23, 2012. The current year three month period includes a non-cash impairment of $1.9 million related to our investment in Schurman Fine Papers (“Schurman”). Refer to Note 1, “Basis of Presentation,” to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further information. The prior year included a gain of $1.1 million associated with the sale of a portion of our investment in Party City.

The Corporation’s effective tax rate was 8.6% and 61.5% for the three months ended November 29, 2013 and November 23, 2012, respectively. The lower than statutory rate for the current year quarter is due primarily to the release of reserves upon lapse of the applicable statutes and related to positions that have been effectively settled under audit. The higher than statutory rate in the prior year quarter was due primarily to the low pretax loss, which magnified the impact that discrete items have on the effective tax rate.

~~Net income was $31.5 million in the nine months ended November 29, 2013 compared to $2.2 million in the prior year nine months.~~

~~Our results for the nine months ended November 29, 2013 and November 23, 2012 are summarized below:~~

For the nine months ended November 29, 2013, consolidated net sales were $1.41 billion, up from $1.28 billion in the prior year nine months. This 10.3%, or $131.2 million, increase was primarily related to the purchase of Clinton Cards retail operations during the prior year second quarter. The current year period includes nine months of sales through Clinton Cards retail stores, while the prior year period includes sales for slightly less than five months. In total, net sales related to Clinton Cards for the nine months ended November 29, 2013 increased approximately $100 million compared to the prior year period. Also contributing to the increase in net sales during the nine months ended November 29, 2013 were higher sales in our fixtures business of approximately $32 million, of which approximately $26 million was related to a large contract obtained in the current year first quarter, as mentioned in the overview section of this Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations. In addition, as discussed in the overview section, the nine month period ended November 29, 2013 includes six additional selling days compared to the prior year period. We estimate that the additional six selling days improved net sales, primarily everyday greeting cards, approximately $18 million compared to the to the prior year. The remaining year over year improvement was due to higher sales of gift packaging products of approximately $6 million and the prior year impairment of deferred costs of approximately $4 million related to the supply agreement associated with Clinton Cards’ Birthdays stores. Partially offsetting these increases were reduced greeting cards sales of approximately $6 million, lower other ancillary product sales of approximately $7 million and the unfavorable impact of foreign currency translation of approximately $16 million.

Other revenue, primarily royalty revenue from our Strawberry Shortcake and Care Bears properties, increased $0.3 million in the nine months ended November 29, 2013 compared to the same period in the prior year.

~~Unit and pricing comparatives (on a sales less returns basis) for the nine months ended November 29, 2013 and November 23, 2012 are summarized below:~~

~~During the nine months ended November 29, 2013, combined everyday and seasonal greeting card sales less returns increased 2.2% compared to the prior year nine months.~~ The overall increase was primarily driven by increases in selling prices from our everyday greeting cards in both our North American Social Expression Products and ~~our~~ International Social Expression Products ~~segments and unit volume improvement from our seasonal greeting cards in our North American Social Expression Products segment.~~segments.

Everyday card sales less returns during the three months ended May 30, 2014 were up ~~1.6% during the nine months ended November 29, 2013~~1.4%, compared to the prior year ~~nine months, as a result of increases~~quarter. Increases in selling prices of ~~2.6%~~5.5% were partially offset by a decrease in unit volume of ~~1.0%~~3.9%. The selling price increase was a result of general price ~~increases outpacing the continued shift to a higher proportion of value card sales.~~increases. The unit volume decline was primarily driven by ~~generally~~ soft sales across most distribution channels. ~~This was substantially offset by a unit volume increase as a result of additional selling days in the current year nine months.~~

Seasonal card sales less returns increased ~~3.6%~~5.4% during the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~November 29, 2013,~~May 30, 2014 compared to the prior year quarter, with ~~unit volume increasing 3.7% and selling prices declining 0.1%. The~~an increase in unit volume ~~during the current year quarter~~of 6.9% partially offset by a decline in selling prices of 1.5%. The unit volume improvement was ~~partially~~ driven by our ~~Christmas programs~~Mother’s Day program in both our North American Social Expression Products and ~~our~~ International Social Expression Products segments ~~due to year-over-year timing of seasonal shipments. Also contributing to the unit volume improvement were~~and our ~~Mother’s~~Easter, Father’s Day ~~Graduation~~ and ~~Fall~~Graduation programs within ~~the~~our North American Social Expression Products segment. The decrease in selling prices was primarily attributable to our Father’s Day and Graduation programs in our North American Social Expression Products segment and our Mother’s Day program in our International Social Expression Products segment.

~~MLOPC for the nine months ended November 29, 2013~~Material, labor and other production costs were ~~$625.3 million, an increase of $40.6 million from $584.7~~$200.8 million for the ~~comparable period~~three months ended May 30, 2014, a decrease of $3.0 million from $203.8 million in the prior ~~year.~~year first quarter. As a percentage of total revenue, these costs were ~~43.9%~~39.9% in the current period compared to ~~45.2%~~41.0% for the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~November 23, 2012.~~May 31, 2013. The ~~retail operations we purchased from Clinton Cards in the prior year second quarter caused a net increase in MLOPC of approximately $41 million in the nine months ended November 29, 2013 compared~~decrease was due to ~~the prior year nine month period. In addition, the combination of higher sales volume,~~lower costs primarily related to product display material costs, partially offset by ~~favorable~~unfavorable product ~~mix, caused an increase in MLOPC of approximately $5 million. These increases were~~mix. Also partially ~~offset by~~offsetting the ~~favorable~~decrease was the unfavorable impact of foreign currency translation of approximately $5$4 million.

~~SDM~~Selling, distribution and marketing expenses ~~for the nine months ended November 29, 2013~~ were ~~$502.5 million, increasing $36.3 million from $466.2~~$172.3 million for the ~~comparable period~~three months ended May 30, 2014, increasing $2.0 million from $170.3 million in the prior ~~year.~~year first quarter. As a percentage of total revenue, these costs were ~~35.3%~~34.2% in the current period compared to 34.3% for the prior year period. The dollar increase in the current year ~~compared to 36.0% in the prior year nine month period. The increase~~first quarter was ~~primarily~~ driven by ~~higher expenses of approximately $59 million within our Retail Operations segment due to~~ the timing of the Clinton Cards acquisition in the prior year second quarter. The current year period includes nine months of activity related to Clinton Cards retail stores while the prior year period includes activity for slightly less than five months. This increase was partially offset by lower marketing and product management expenses of approximately $16 million, the majority of which related to Cardstore.com and the favorableunfavorable impact of foreign currency translation of approximately $6$4 million and higher supply chain costs of approximately $1 million. Partially offsetting these increases were lower sales, marketing and product management expenses and lower retail store expenses of approximately $2 million and $1 million, respectively.

Administrative and general expenses were ~~$228.6~~$69.3 million for the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~November 29, 2013, an increase~~May 30, 2014, a decrease of ~~$3.1~~$1.8 million from ~~$225.5~~$71.1 million ~~for~~in the ~~nine months ended November 23, 2012. The increase~~prior year first quarter. This decrease was driven primarily by ~~higher~~prior year costs and fees related to the ~~Merger~~proposal to go private of approximately ~~$26 million compared to the prior year period and~~$5 million. The decrease was partially offset by higher ~~expenses of approximately $9 million within our Retail Operations segment primarily due to the timing of the Clinton Cards acquisition~~costs in ~~the prior year second quarter. The current year nine months includes approximately $10 million of higher variable compensation expense related to a combination of an adjustment to~~ the current year ~~expected variable compensation program payout and the establishment during the current quarter~~ of approximately $2 million related to a long-term incentive program that we established in the third quarter of the prior year as a replacement to ~~replace the~~our prior stock-based compensation ~~programs. The adjustment to~~programs and the current year variable compensation program was necessary as it is probable, based on current year-to-date operating results, that we will exceed previously established performance targets. These increases were substantially offset by lower bad debt expense, whereby the prior year period included approximately $17 million related to increased unsecured accounts receivable exposure as a result of Clinton Cards being placed into administration. In addition, the prior year period included transaction costs in connection with the acquisition of the Clinton Cards retail operations of approximately $6 million that did not recur in the current year. Also partially offsetting the increases were lower legal related expenses of approximately $9 million, a year-over-year decrease in costs related to our information technology systems refresh project of approximately $5 million, the favorableunfavorable impact of foreign currency translation of approximately $1 ~~million and general cost savings, of which no items were individually significant, of approximately $4~~ million.

Other operating ~~(income) expense~~income – net was ~~$6.6~~$2.0 million ~~of income~~ during the current year quarter compared to ~~$9.0~~$3.3 million ~~of expense~~ in the prior year. In both the current year ~~period. The prior year nine months included expenses of $2.1 million related to the termination of certain agency agreements associated with our licensing business~~ and ~~an impairment of $10.0 million related to the senior secured debt of Clinton Cards that we acquired in the~~ prior year first ~~quarter. In the current year nine month period,~~quarter, based on updated estimated recovery information provided in connection with the Clinton Cards bankruptcy administration, we recorded ~~adjustments~~an impairment recovery related to the senior secured debt of Clinton Cards that we acquired in May 2012 and subsequently impaired. The recovery was $3.4 million for the three months ended May 30, 2014 and $2.0 million for three months ended May 31, 2013. The current quarter recovery represents the final amount of a full recovery of the prior impairment. The income related to the impairment recovery in the current year first quarter was partially offset by other expenses of $2.1 million related to the Clinton Cards ~~debt impairment resulting in a gain totaling $4.2 million.~~bankruptcy administration.

~~Other non-operating income – net was $4.4 million for the nine months ended November 29, 2013 compared to $6.9 million for the nine months ended November 23, 2012.~~ The current year period includes a non-cash impairment of $1.9 million related to our investment in Schurman. Refer to Note 1, “Basis of Presentation,” to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further information. In addition, the current and prior year periods included gains associated with our investment in Party City in the amounts of $3.3 million and $4.3 million, respectively.

~~The Corporation’s~~ effective tax rate was ~~49.1%~~21.1% and ~~2.8%~~36.4% for the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~November 29,~~May 30, 2014 and May 31, 2013, ~~and November 23, 2012,~~ respectively. The ~~higher~~lower than statutory rate in the current period is due primarily to the recording of ~~an $8.0~~a net $3.1 million federal tax refund and related interest attributable to fiscal 2000 and the error corrections recorded in accordance with Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 250, Accounting Changes and Error Corrections. The net impact of the error corrections was a reduction to income tax expense of $4.1 million. During the three months ended May 30, 2014, we identified and corrected errors in the accounting for income taxes that related to the year ended February 28, 2014. These errors primarily related to our failure to consider all sources of available income when assessing the need for a valuation allowance against certain ~~net operating loss~~deferred tax assets and ~~foreign~~the recognition of a liability for an uncertain tax ~~credit carryforwards that we believe will expire unused. The valuation allowance was recorded~~position. These errors were the result of the significant complexity created as a result of the Merger and related transactions in ~~accordance with Internal Revenue Code sections 382 and 383 due~~fiscal 2014. See Note 1, “Basis of Presentation,” to the ~~Merger. The lower than statutory rate~~Consolidated Financial Statements for the nine months ended November 23, 2012 is due primarily to lower taxable income, which magnified the impact that discrete items have on the effective tax rate, and the release of reserves upon lapse of the applicable statutes.further information.

Our operations are organized and managed according to a number of factors, including product categories, geographic locations and channels of distribution. Our North American Social Expression Products and International Social Expression Products segments primarily design, manufacture and sell greeting cards and other related products through various channels of distribution, with mass retailers as the primary channel. As permitted under ~~Accounting Standards Codification~~ASC Topic 280 (“ASC 280”), “Segment Reporting,” certain operating segments have been aggregated into the International Social Expression Products segment. The aggregated operating ~~segments~~divisions have similar economic characteristics, products, production processes, types of customers and distribution methods. ~~As of November 29, 2013,~~At May 30, 2014, we ~~were operating 403~~operated 400 card and gift retail stores in the ~~United Kingdom (“UK”)~~UK through our Retail Operations segment. These stores sell products purchased from the International Social Expression Products segment as well as products purchased from other vendors. The AG Interactive segment distributes social expression products, including electronic greetings, and a broad range of graphics and digital services and products, through a variety of electronic channels, including Web sites, Internet portals ~~instant messaging services~~ and electronic mobile devices. The Non-reportable segments primarily include licensing activities and the design, manufacture and sales of display fixtures.

Segment results are reported using actual foreign exchange rates for the periods presented. Refer to Note ~~17,~~16, “Business Segment Information,” to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further information and a reconciliation of total segment revenue to consolidated “Total revenue” and total segment earnings (loss) before tax to consolidated “Income ~~(loss)~~ before income tax ~~expense (benefit).~~expense.”


(Dollars in thousands)	Three Months Ended November				% Change				Nine Months Ended November							% Change
(Dollars in thousands)														Three Months Ended
(Dollars in thousands)	29, 2013		23, 2012		% Change			% Change			29, 2013				23, 2012					% Change	May 30, 2014		May 31, 2013			% Change
(Dollars in thousands)	$	342,185	$	333,852		$	932,166	% Change				$	908,267			% Change		$	329,057	% Change	$	328,287		0.2	%
Segment earnings		22,894		22,099		3.6	%			124,286			98,757				25.9	%		69,364	66,347		4.5	%

Total revenue of our North American Social Expression Products segment for the ~~three and nine months~~quarter ended November 29, 2013 increased $8.3 million and $23.9 million, respectively, compared to the prior year periods. The increase during the current quarter was primarily driven by higher sales of gift packaging and greeting cards of approximately $7 million and $2 million, respectively. The increase in total revenue for the nine months ended November 29, 2013 was primarily driven by the additional six selling days compared to the prior year period. We estimate that the additional six days equates to approximately $15 million of net sales. In addition, sales of gift packaging, party goods and other ancillary products increased by approximately $11 million. These increases were partially offset by the unfavorable impact of foreign currency translation of approximately $3 million.

~~Segment earnings~~May 30, 2014, increased $0.8 million, in the current three months compared to the three months ended November 23, 2012. In addition to the impact of higher sales, the increase in earnings was primarily driven by decreases in marketing and product management expenses of approximately $9 million and lower costs related to our information technology systems refresh project of approximately $3 million. These favorable variances were substantially offset by higher costs related to variable compensation expense (as noted above) of approximately $8 million, increased supply chain costs of approximately $3 million and higher product display costs of approximately $2 million.

~~Segment earnings increased $25.5 million in the current nine months~~or 0.2%, compared to the prior year period. The increase was primarily driven by higher sales of greetings cards of approximately $6 million, partially offset by lower sales of gift packaging and party goods of approximately $2 million and the unfavorable impacts of foreign currency translation and higher SBT implementations of approximately $2 million and $1 million, respectively.

Segment earnings increased $3.0 million in the current year three months compared to the three months ended May 31, 2013. The increase was driven primarily by the impact of ~~higher revenues as well as decreases in marketing~~favorable product mix and lower product ~~management expenses and costs related to our information technology systems refresh project of approximately $15 million and $5 million, respectively.~~display material costs. These favorable ~~variances~~items were partially offset by higher supply chain costs ~~related to unfavorable product mix as well as variable compensation expense (as noted above)~~ of approximately ~~$7 million.~~$2 million and the unfavorable impact of higher SBT implementations.


																			Three Months Ended
(Dollars in thousands)	Three Months Ended November					% Change				Nine Months Ended November						% Change			May 30, 2014				May 31, 2013				% Change
(Dollars in thousands)	29, 2013		23, 2012						29, 2013			23, 2012
Total revenue	$	70,439	$	76,434			(7.8	%)		$	184,783		$	200,406				(7.8	%)		$	64,974			$	59,709				8.8	%
Segment earnings (loss)		6,242		(710	)		—				7,256			(30,380	)		—
Segment earnings																				1,452				330				340.0	%

Total revenue of our International Social Expression Products segment ~~decreased $6.0~~increased $5.3 million, ~~and $15.6 million~~or 8.8% for the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~November 29, 2013, respectively,~~May 30, 2014, compared to the same period in the prior ~~year periods.~~year. The ~~decreases were~~increase was primarily ~~due to lower~~driven by higher sales of ~~gift packaging of approximately $3 million for both the current year three and nine month periods and lower sales of other ancillary products~~greetings cards of approximately $2 million and ~~$7 million for~~ the ~~current year three and nine month periods, respectively, primarily due to the prior year disposition~~favorable impacts of ~~a small non-card product line. In addition, greeting card sales were lower in the current nine month period by approximately $3 million. Foreign~~foreign currency translation ~~had an unfavorable impact~~and fewer SBT implementations of approximately $2 million and $7$1 million, ~~for the current year three and nine month periods,~~ respectively. Partially offsetting the decreases in the nine months ended November 29, 2013 was the prior year impairment of deferred costs of approximately $4 million related to the supply agreement associated with the Clinton Cards’ Birthdays stores that were closed as part of the Clinton Cards bankruptcy administration process that did not recur in the current year.

Segment earnings increased ~~$7.0~~$1.1 million in the three months ended ~~November 29, 2013,~~May 30, 2014 compared to the same period in the prior ~~year period.~~year. The increased earnings were primarily driven by the impact ~~on earnings from decreased revenue was more than offset by favorable product mix~~of higher sales volume as well as slightly lower year-over-year scrap ~~expenses~~expense and supply chain ~~costs of approximately $3 million and $2 million, respectively.~~

Segment earnings increased $37.6 million in the nine months ended November 29, 2013, compared to the nine months ended November 23, 2012. The improvement in earnings was primarily driven by prior year period costs of approximately $21 million related to Clinton Cards that do not have comparative amounts in the current year period. In the first quarter of the prior year, Clinton Cards, a significant third-party customer at the time, was placed into administration. As a result, we incurred bad debt expense of approximately $17 million and an impairment of deferred costs related to the supply agreement associated with the Clinton Cards’ Birthdays stores of approximately $4 million. The impact on earnings from decreased revenue was more thancosts. These favorable items were partially offset by ~~favorable~~unfavorable product mix as well as lower supply chain costs and scrap expenses of approximately $4 million and $3 million, respectively. Also contributing to the increased earnings were decreases in administrative and general expenses of approximately $3 million.mix.


(Dollars in thousands)	Three Months Ended November						% Change				Nine Months Ended November								% Change
																	Three Months Ended
(Dollars in thousands)	29, 2013			23, 2012						% Change				29, 2013				23, 2012					% Change		May 30, 2014		May 31, 2013			% Change
	$	64,875		$	67,635			$	202,325						$	107,519					$	79,164			$	74,718		6.0	%
Segment loss		(12,825	)		(11,473	)		(11.8	%)			(25,261	)			(16,579	)			—			(4,040	)	(3,452	)	(17.0	%)

InTotal revenue of our Retail Operations segment increased $4.4 million compared to the prior year, ~~second~~driven by the impact of favorable foreign exchange translation of approximately $6 million. During the first quarter we acquired retail stores in the UK that we are operating under the “Clintons” brand. As of November 29, 2013, we were operating 403 stores. As with many retail businesses, the Retail Operations segment’s business is extremely seasonal in nature. As such, the overall profitability of this segment is highly dependent on success during the December holiday season. Due to the timing of the Clinton Cards acquisition, the operating results of the Retail Operations segment for the nine month period ended November 23, 2012 included slightly less than five months of activity. During the third quarter,current year, net sales at stores open one year or more were down approximately ~~2.2%~~3.5% compared to the prior year period.


(Dollars in thousands)	Three Months Ended November				% Change				Nine Months Ended November							% Change
(Dollars in thousands)														Three Months Ended
(Dollars in thousands)	29, 2013		23, 2012		% Change			% Change			29, 2013				23, 2012					% Change	May 30, 2014		May 31, 2013			% Change
(Dollars in thousands)	$	15,935	$	15,982		$	45,139	% Change				$	47,255			% Change		$	14,499	% Change	$	14,700		(1.4	%)
Segment earnings		3,477		5,331		(34.8	%)			9,955			13,713				(27.4	%)		5,412	3,313		63.4	%

Total revenue of ~~our~~ AG Interactive ~~segment for the three months ended November 29, 2013 was essentially flat~~decreased $0.2 million compared to the prior year ~~third~~ quarter. ~~Total revenue of our AG Interactive segment for the nine months ended November 29, 2013 was $45.1 million compared to $47.3 million in the prior year nine months. The~~This decrease in revenue ~~in the nine month period~~ was driven primarily by slightly lower advertising ~~revenue~~ and ~~lower~~ subscription revenue ~~related~~compared to the ~~disposition of a minor photo sharing business in the~~ prior ~~fiscal~~ year. At the end of the ~~third~~first quarter of fiscal ~~2014~~2015 and ~~2013,~~2014, AG Interactive had approximately 3.7 million online paid subscriptions.

Segment earnings ~~decreased $1.9~~increased $2.1 million ~~and $3.8 million for the three and nine months ended November 29, 2013, respectively,~~ compared to the prior year ~~periods,~~quarter primarily due to cost savings initiatives initiated in the ~~impact of lower~~prior year.

Total revenue from our Non-reportable segment decreased $4.0 million compared to the prior year ~~gain recognized~~quarter. This decrease in ~~connection with~~revenue was driven primarily by our fixtures business, where, during the ~~disposition~~first quarter of the prior year, we obtained a ~~minor photo sharing business that~~contract to supply fixtures to a large consumer electronics company. This contract, which was completed during the second quarter of the prior year, contributed $9.6 million of revenue in the prior year first quarter and did not recur in the ~~current period and severance expense incurred in~~first quarter of the current year. This decrease in revenue was partially offset by other fixtures business revenue growth.

Segment earnings decreased $3.4 million compared to the prior year ~~third~~ quarter. This decrease was primarily due lower sales volume and unfavorable product mix.

Centrally incurred and managed costs are not allocated back to the operating segments. The unallocated items include interest expense for ~~centrally incurred~~centrally-incurred debt, domestic profit-sharing expense, and in the three months ended May 31, 2013, stock-based compensation expense. Unallocated items also ~~include~~included costs associated with corporate operations such as the senior management, corporate finance, legal and insurance programs.


	Three Months Ended November						Nine Months Ended November						Three Months Ended
(Dollars in thousands)	29, 2013			23, 2012			29, 2013			23, 2012			May 30, 2014			May 31, 2013
Interest expense	$	(8,454	)	$	(4,504	)	$	(18,199	)	$	(13,314	)	$	(8,994	)	$	(4,312	)
Profit-sharing plan expense		(407	)		(423	)		(4,872	)		(3,852	)
Profit-sharing expense														(4,079	)		(3,981	)
Stock-based compensation expense		—			(2,965	)		(13,596	)		(7,806	)		—			(2,475	)
Corporate overhead expense		(13,022	)		(12,713	)		(40,877	)		(43,790	)		(7,694	)		(10,606	)

Total Unallocated	$	(21,883	)	$	(20,605	)	$	(77,544	)	$	(68,762	)	$	(20,767	)	$	(21,374	)

Interest expense for the three and nine month periods ended November 29, 2013 increased approximately $4 million and $5 million, respectively, primarily due to increased borrowings in connection with the Merger. For further information, refer to the discussion of our borrowing arrangements as disclosed in Note 12, “Debt,” to the Consolidated Financial Statements. In the prior year ~~nine months,~~first quarter, corporate overhead expense included ~~legal and advisory fees~~$4.5 million of ~~approximately $6 million related to the Clinton Cards~~non-recurring transaction an impairment of $10 million related to the senior secured debt of Clinton Cards and higher legal expenses of approximately $9 million primarily related to two class action lawsuits involving corporate-owned life insurance policies. The current year nine months included an adjustment to the Clinton Cards debt impairment, based on current estimated recovery information provided in connectioncosts associated with the ~~Clinton Cards bankruptcy administration, which resulted~~going private transaction. Also in ~~a gain of approximately $4 million and higher expenses related to~~ the ~~Merger of approximately $26 million. For~~prior year, the ~~three and nine month periods ended November 29, 2013,~~ stock-based compensation in the table above includes non-cash stock-based compensation prior to the ~~Merger and the impact~~closing of the ~~settlement of stock options and the cancellation or modification of outstanding restricted stock units and performance shares concurrent with the Merger, a portion of which is non-cash.~~going private transaction. There is no stock-based compensation subsequent to the ~~Merger,~~closing of the going private transaction as these plans were converted into ~~cash~~cash-based compensation ~~plans at the time of the Merger. Refer to Note 3, “Merger,” to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further information.~~plans.

The seasonal nature of our business precludes a useful comparison of the current period and the fiscal year-end financial statements; therefore, a Consolidated Statement of Financial Position as of ~~November 23, 2012,~~May 31, 2013 has been included.

Operating activities used ~~$33.1~~$34.9 million of cash during the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~November 29, 2013,~~May 30, 2014, compared to providing ~~$32.1~~$24.3 million in the prior year period.

Accounts receivable used ~~$94.6~~$32.1 million of cash during the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~November 29, 2013,~~May 30, 2014, compared to ~~$101.4~~$17.2 million of cash used during the same period in the prior ~~year period.~~year. The year-over-year change in cash flow of ~~$6.8~~approximately $14.9 million occurred primarily within our ~~Retail Operations and~~ North American Social Expression ~~Products segments. The North American~~and International Social Expression ~~Products segment increase is~~segments and was due to the timing of collections from, or credits issued to, certain customers occurring in a different pattern in the current year period compared to the prior year period. In the prior year period, accounts receivable increased in the Retail Operations segment, a use of cash, due to amounts outstanding from the bankruptcy administrator related to retail cash receipts during the transition period. These amounts were partially offset by growth in accounts receivable, a use of cash, within our fixtures business which was driven by growth in accounts receivable related to higher sales levels compared to the prior year period.

Inventory used ~~$43.6~~$4.6 million of cash during the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~November 29, 2013,~~May 30, 2014, compared to ~~$39.1~~providing $4.2 million inof cash during the prior year ~~nine months. Historically, the~~ first ~~nine months of our fiscal year is a period of inventory build, and thus a~~quarter. The use of cash in ~~preparation for~~ the ~~winter seasonal holidays.~~current year quarter was primarily due to inventory builds in our fixtures business.

Deferred costs -– net generally represents payments under agreements with retailers, net of the related amortization of those payments. During the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~November 29,~~May 30, 2014, amortization exceeded payments by $6.9 million. During the three months ended May 31, 2013, amortization exceeded payments by ~~$15.0 million. During the nine months ended November 23, 2012, amortization exceeded payments by $23.7~~$10.2 million. See Note ~~11,~~9, “Deferred Costs,” to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further detail of deferred costs related to customer agreements.

Accounts payable and other liabilities used ~~$21.9~~$58.5 million of cash during the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~November 29, 2013,~~May 30, 2014, compared to ~~providing $112.3~~using $42.4 million in the prior year ~~period.~~first quarter. The year-over-year change in cash usage was ~~primarily~~ attributable to ~~the timing of payments compared to the prior year period. The prior year period growth~~a decrease in accounts payable ~~and other liabilities, and thus the increase in cash flow for the prior year period, was~~ due to ~~our new Retail Operations segment~~normal year-over-year timing of business transactions and related payments as well as ~~activities related~~the impact of our former stock-based compensation converting to ~~our information technology systems refresh project.~~cash based-compensation.

Investing activities used ~~$26.6~~$21.6 million of cash during the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~November 29, 2013,~~May 30, 2014, compared to ~~$137.9~~$15.2 million inof cash during the ~~prior year period.~~three months ended May 31, 2013. In the current year ~~period,~~first quarter, the cash usage was primarily driven by ~~$45.3~~$22.2 million of cash paid for capital ~~expenditures. The current year period also included the receipt of a cash distribution of $12.1~~expenditures as compared to $15.5 million ~~related to our investment~~ in ~~Party City.~~

~~During~~ the prior year first ~~quarter, we paid $56.6 million of cash to acquire all of the outstanding senior secured debt of Clinton Cards. In addition, cash paid for capital expenditures was $87.4 million.~~quarter.

Financing activities ~~used $11.5~~provided $57.1 million of cash during the ~~current year nine~~three months ended May 30, 2014, compared to ~~providing $36.9~~using $31.0 million during the three months ended May 31, 2013. During the current year first quarter, this source of cash was primarily driven by borrowings, net of repayments, under our revolving credit facility of $62.1 million. In addition, we made a payment of $5.0 million on our term loan. In the first quarter of the prior year, ~~period. The primary~~the use of cash ~~in the current year period~~ was ~~in connection with activities~~primarily related to ~~the Merger. These activities included~~dividend payments and repayments of borrowings under our ~~new~~revolving credit ~~agreement, net of~~

repayments and debt issuance costs, which provided cash of $348.8 million, the contribution from Parent, which provided cash of $240.0 million, and payment of cash of $568.3 million to complete the Merger and cancel outstanding shares. In addition, wefacility. We paid cash dividends of ~~$27.8~~$4.8 million and made payments, net of ~~which $9.6 million was paid to common shareholders prior to the Merger and $18.2 million was paid to Parent after the Merger.~~

~~The prior year period source of cash relates to~~borrowings, reducing our outstanding borrowings under our credit agreement, which provided $131.7 million of cash during the prior year nine months. Partially offsetting this source of cash were share repurchases and dividend payments. We paid $78.7 million to repurchase approximately 5.3 million Class A common shares under our repurchase program in the prior year nine months. In addition, we paid cash dividends of $15.2 million in the prior year nine months.by $26.1 million.

Substantial credit sources are available to us. In total, we had available sources of credit of approximately ~~$650~~$635 million at ~~November 29, 2013,~~May 30, 2014, which included ~~a $350~~$335 million outstanding on our term loan facility, a $250 million revolving credit facility ~~each provided by our credit agreement,~~ and a $50 million accounts receivable securitization facility, of which ~~$195.4~~$205.7 million in the aggregate was unused as of ~~November 29, 2013.~~May 30, 2014. Borrowings under the accounts receivable securitization facility are limited based on our eligible receivables outstanding. ~~The term loan facility was fully drawn on August 9, 2013, the closing date of the Merger.~~ At ~~November 29, 2013,~~May 30, 2014, we had ~~$77.3~~$66.6 million of borrowings outstanding under our revolving credit facility and we had no borrowings outstanding under ~~the~~our accounts receivable securitization facility. We had, in the aggregate, ~~$27.3~~$27.7 million outstanding under letters of credit, which reduced the total credit availability thereunder as of ~~November 29, 2013.~~May 30, 2014.

~~For further information,~~Please refer to the discussion of our borrowing arrangements as disclosed in ~~Note 12, “Debt,” to~~ the ~~Consolidated Financial Statements.~~“Credit Sources” section under Part II, Item 7 of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended February 28, 2014 for further information.

At ~~November 29, 2013,~~May 30, 2014, we were in compliance with our financial covenants under the borrowing agreements described above.

~~In connection with~~On February 10, 2014, Century Intermediate Holding Company 2 (“CIHC2”), an indirect parent of American Greetings, issued $285 million aggregate principal amount of 9.75%/10.50% Senior PIK Toggle Notes due 2019 (the “PIK Notes”). Excluding the ~~Merger, Parent issued $245 million of preferred stock. Parent~~first and last interest payment periods, which must be paid in cash, CIHC2 may elect to either accrue or pay cash ~~for dividends~~interest on the ~~preferred stock.~~PIK Notes. The ~~preferred stock carries~~PIK Notes carry a cash ~~dividend~~interest rate of ~~LIBOR plus 11.5%~~9.75%. Prior to the payment of ~~dividends~~interest by ~~Parent,~~CIHC2, it is expected that we will provide ~~Parent~~CIHC2 with the cash flow for ~~Parent~~CHIC2 to pay ~~dividends~~interest on the ~~preferred stock.~~PIK Notes. Assuming ~~the dividends are~~interest is paid regularly in cash, rather than accrued, the annual cash required to pay the ~~dividend~~interest is expected to be approximately ~~$29~~$27.8 million while the entire issuance of PIK Notes are outstanding. For further information, refer to the ~~preferred stock is outstanding.~~discussion of the PIK Notes as disclosed in “Transactions with Parent Companies and Other Affiliated Companies” in Note 18, “Related Party Information,” to the Consolidated Financial Statements under Part II, Item 18 of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended February 28, 2014.

Throughout fiscal ~~2014~~2015 and thereafter, we will continue to consider all options for capital deployment including growth opportunities, acquisitions and other investments in third parties, expanding customer relationships, expenditures or investments related to our current product leadership initiatives or other future strategic initiatives, capital expenditures, the information technology systems refresh project, paying down debt, paying dividends and, as appropriate, preserving cash. Our future operating cash flow and borrowing availability under our credit agreement and our accounts receivable securitization facility are expected to meet these and other currently anticipated funding requirements. The seasonal nature of our business results in peak working capital requirements that may be financed through short-term borrowings when cash on hand is insufficient.

Over roughly the next five or six years, we expect to allocate resources, including capital, to refresh our information technology systems by modernizing our systems, redesigning and deploying new processes, and evolving new organization structures, all of which are intended to drive efficiencies within the business and add new capabilities. Amounts that we spend could be material in any fiscal year and over the life of the project. The total amount spent through fiscal ~~2013~~2014 on this project was approximately ~~$84~~$109 million. During the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~November 29, 2013,~~May 30, 2014, we spent approximately ~~$22~~$3 million, including capital of approximately ~~$19~~$2 million and expense of approximately $3$1 million, on these information technology systems. We currently expect to spend a total of at least an additional $150 million on these information technology systems over the remaining life of the project, the

majority of which we expect will be capital expenditures. We believe these investments are important to our business, help us drive further efficiencies and add new capabilities; however, there can be no assurance that we will not spend more or less than $150 million over the remaining life of the project, or that we will achieve the anticipated efficiencies or any cost savings.

~~During March~~In May 2011, we announced ~~that in fiscal 2012 we expected that we would begin~~plans to ~~invest in the development of a~~relocate our world headquarters to the Crocker Park mixed use development in ~~the Northeast~~Westlake, Ohio, ~~area. The state of Ohio~~which offers a vibrant urban setting, with retail stores and ~~the city of Westlake have committed certain tax credits, loans~~restaurants, offices and ~~other incentives to assist us in the development of a new headquarters in Ohio. We are required to make certain investments and meet other criteria to receive these incentives over time. Although~~apartments. After putting the project ~~to build a new world headquarters had been put~~ on hold pending the outcome of the proposal to go private, we announced plans in ~~connection with the Going Private Proposal, now that the Merger has closed,~~October 2013 to resume the project ~~has resumed. Under~~and on March 26, 2014, we purchased the ~~structure currently being proposed for~~land on which the new world headquarters ~~however, we~~ will ~~not~~ be ~~responsible for building~~built. We are leasing a portion of the real property to H L & L Property Company, a Delaware corporation and indirect affiliate of American Greetings (“H L & L”), that will build the new world headquarters ~~building.~~on the site. We ~~expect that, although American Greetings will acquire~~have also entered into an operating lease with H L & L for the ~~land upon which~~use of the new world headquarters building, will be built (the “Crocker Park Site”), a single-purpose entity that is affiliated with American Greetings through common ownership will lease the Crocker Park Site from us, construct the world headquarters on the Crocker Park Site and lease the world headquarters to us under the terms of an operating lease. Althoughwhich we ~~continue to~~ expect to ~~benefit from~~be ready for occupancy in approximately two years. Further details of the ~~state and local tax credits originally offered to us~~relocation undertaking are provided in ~~connection with the project, the cost to construct the world headquarters is expected to be borne by our affiliate.~~

In connection with our acquisition of Clinton Cards, we originally expected to acquire approximately 400 stores from the Sellers, together with related inventory and overhead, as well as the Clinton Cards and related brands. As of November 29, 2013, we completed 388 lease assignments. The number of stores that the Corporation is operating, including both lease assignments and new stores, is 403. The estimated future minimum rental payments for noncancelable operating leases related to the 403 stores is approximately $370 million. Refer to Note ~~4, “Acquisition,~~18, “Related Party Information,” to the Consolidated Financial Statements ~~for further information.~~

~~Our future operating cash flow and borrowing availability~~ under ~~our credit agreement and our accounts receivable securitization facility are expected to meet currently anticipated funding requirements. The seasonal nature~~Part II, Item 18 of our ~~business results~~Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended February 28, 2014 and Note 15, “Related Party Information,” to the Consolidated Financial Statements of this Form 10-Q.

On June 13, 2014, we paid a cash dividend in ~~peak working capital requirements that may be financed through short-term borrowings when cash on hand is insufficient.~~the aggregate amount of $9.9 million to Century Intermediate Holding Company, our parent and sole shareholder. In addition, H L & L paid to us $9.9 million to acquire certain assets previously purchased by us related to the new world headquarters project.

Our consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. The preparation of these financial statements requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the periods presented. Please refer to the discussion of our Critical Accounting Policies ~~as disclosed in~~under Part II, Item 7 of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended February 28, ~~2013.~~2014.

Certain statements in this report may constitute forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Federal securities laws. These statements can be identified by the fact that they do not relate strictly to historic or current facts. They use such words as “anticipate,” “estimate,” “expect,” “project,” “intend,” “plan,” ~~“believe,”~~“believe” and other words and terms of similar meaning in connection with any discussion of future operating or financial performance. These forward-looking statements are based on currently available information, but are subject to a variety of uncertainties, unknown risks and other factors concerning our operations and business environment, which are difficult to predict and may be beyond our control. Important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those suggested by these forward-looking statements, and that could adversely affect our future financial performance, include, but are not limited to, the following:

~~Risks pertaining specifically to AG Interactive include the viability of subscriptions as a revenue generator and the ability to adapt to rapidly changing social media.~~

The risks and uncertainties identified above are not the only risks we face. Additional risks and uncertainties not presently known to us or that we believe to be immaterial also may adversely affect us. Should any known or unknown risks or uncertainties develop into actual events, or underlying assumptions prove inaccurate, these developments could have material adverse effects on our business, financial condition and results of operations. For further information concerning the risks we face and issues that could materially affect our financial performance related to forward-looking statements, refer to our periodic filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, including the “Risk Factors” section included in Part I, Item 1A of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended February 28, ~~2013 and included in Part II, Item 1A of our Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q.~~2014.

For further information, refer to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended February 28, ~~2013.~~2014. There were no material changes in market risk, specifically interest rate and foreign currency exposure, for us from February 28, ~~2013,~~2014, the end of our preceding fiscal year, to ~~November 29, 2013,~~May 30, 2014, the end of our most recent fiscal quarter.

American Greetings maintains disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in its reports under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the ~~Securities and Exchange~~ Commission’s rules and forms and that such information is accumulated and communicated to the Corporation’s management, including its ~~co-Chief~~Co-Chief Executive Officers and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow for timely decisions regarding required disclosure. In designing and evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures, management recognizes that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives.

American Greetings carries out a variety of on-going procedures, under the supervision and with the participation of the Corporation’s management, including its ~~co-Chief~~Co-Chief Executive Officers and Chief Financial Officer, to evaluate the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Corporation’s disclosure controls and procedures. Based onupon the ~~foregoing,~~procedures performed during the ~~co-Chief~~current fiscal quarter, our Co-Chief Executive Officers and Chief Financial Officer ~~of American Greetings~~ concluded that ~~the Corporation’s~~our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective as of the end of the period covered by this ~~report.~~report because of the material weakness described below, which has not been remediated as of such date.

~~There~~As previously reported in the “Controls and Procedures” section included in Part II, Item 9A of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended February 28, 2014, we identified a material weakness in internal control over financial reporting surrounding our accounting for income taxes. The principal factors contributing to the material weakness in accounting for income taxes were as follows:

In order to remediate this material weakness and further strengthen the overall controls surrounding our accounting for income taxes, we plan to take the following steps to improve the overall processes and controls in our tax function:

Subsequent to the quarter ended May 30, 2014, we began the remediation process outlined above. Specifically related to the preparation of the tax accounts for the quarter ended May 30, 2014, and to ensure that the consolidated financial statements filed with this quarterly report on Form 10-Q are presented fairly in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, we utilized external resources and advisors as discussed above. In utilizing the external resources and advisors, we identified additional errors which were corrected during the period. See Note 1, “Basis of Presentation,” to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further information.

We intend that the remediation of the material weakness related to controls over the accounting for income taxes will be completed as of the end of fiscal 2015, however, it will not be considered remediated until the remedial controls operate for a sufficient period of time and management has concluded, through testing, that these controls are operating effectively. We cannot make any assurances that we will successfully remediate this material weakness within the anticipated timeframe and thus reduce to remote the likelihood that material misstatements concerning accounting for income taxes will not be prevented or detected in a timely manner.

Except for the remedial actions taken to date with respect to the material weakness described above, there has been no change in the Corporation’s internal control over financial reporting during the Corporation’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Corporation’s internal control over financial reporting.

~~Baker/Collier Litigation~~. American Greetings Corporation is a defendant in two putative class action lawsuits involving corporate-owned life insurance policies (the “Insurance Policies”): one filed in the Northern District of Ohio on January 11, 2012 by Theresa Baker as the personal representative of the estate of Richard Charles Wolfe (the “Baker Litigation”); and the other filed in the Northern District of Oklahoma on October 1, 2010 by Keith Collier as the personal representative of the estate of Ruthie Collier (the “Collier Litigation”).

In the Baker Litigation, the plaintiff claims that American Greetings Corporation (1) misappropriated its employees’ names and identities to benefit itself; (2) breached its fiduciary duty by using its employees’ identities and personal information to benefit itself; (3) unjustly enriched itself through the receipt of corporate-owned life insurance policy benefits, interest and investment returns; and (4) improperly received insurance policy benefits for the insurable interest in Mr. Wolfe’s life. The plaintiff seeks damages in the amount of all pecuniary benefits associated with the subject Insurance Policies, including investment returns, interest and life insurance policy benefits that American Greetings Corporation received from the deaths of the former employees whose estates form the putative class.

On May 22, 2013, the Court preliminarily approved a full and final settlement of all of the claims of the Wolfe and Collier estates, as well as the classes they seek to represent. As a result of the preliminary approval, the Court consolidated the two cases and certified a single class that consists of the heirs or estates of the estates and heirs of all former American Greetings Corporation employees (i) who are deceased; (ii) who were not officers or directors of American Greetings; (iii) who were insured under one of the following corporate-owned life insurance plans: Provident Life & Accident 61153, Provident Life & Accident 61159, Mutual Benefit Life Insurance Company 111, Connecticut General ENX219, and Hartford Life Insurance Company 361; and (iv) for whom American Greetings has received a death benefit on or before the date on which the Court enters the Order of Preliminary Approval. Required notices to potential class members and to state attorney generals as required under the Class Action Fairness Act of 2005 were mailed May 30, 2013. On September 20, 2013, the Court entered a final order approving the settlement in the amount of $12.5 million. One half of the settlement amount was deposited by American Greetings Corporation into a settlement fund account on September 27, 2013, and the remaining half of the settlement amount was deposited by American Greetings Corporation into the same settlement fund account on November 12, 2013. The settlement fund will be distributed in its entirety to those members of the class who present valid claims, their counsel, and a settlement administration vendor.

~~Carter/Wolfe/LMPERS Litigation~~. On September 26, 2012, the Corporation announced that the Board of Directors had received the Going Private Proposal. On September 27, 2012, Dolores Carter, a purported shareholder, filed a putative shareholder derivative and class action lawsuit (the “Carter Action”) in the Court of Common Pleas in Cuyahoga County, Ohio (the “Cuyahoga County Court”), against American Greetings Corporation and all of the members of the Board of Directors. The Carter Action alleges, among other things, that the directors of the Corporation breached their fiduciary duties owed to shareholders in evaluating and pursuing the proposal. The Carter Action further alleges claims for aiding and abetting breaches of fiduciary duty. Among other things, the Carter Action seeks declaratory relief. Subsequently, six more lawsuits were filed in the Cuyahoga County Court purporting to advance substantially similar claims on behalf of American Greetings against the members of the Board of Directors and, in certain cases, additional direct claims against American Greetings. One lawsuit was voluntarily dismissed. The other lawsuits were consolidated by Judge Richard J. McMonagle on December 6, 2012 (amended order dated December 18, 2012) as In re American Greetings Corp. Shareholder Litigation, Lead Case No. CV 12 792421 (the “State Court Action”). Lead plaintiffs and lead plaintiffs’ counsel also were appointed.

On April 30, 2013, lead plaintiffs’ counsel filed a Consolidated Class Action Complaint. The Consolidated Complaint brings a single class claim against the members of the Corporation’s Board of Directors for alleged breaches of fiduciary duty and aiding and abetting. The plaintiffs allege that the preliminary proxy statement on Schedule 14A filed with the SEC on April 17, 2013 omits information necessary to permit the Corporation’s shareholders to determine if the Merger is in their best interest, that the controlling shareholders have abused their control of the Corporation, that the special committee appointed to oversee the transaction is not independent, and that the other members of the Board of Directors are also not independent. On June 13, 2013, defendants filed motions to dismiss the Consolidated Class Action Complaint based on plaintiffs’ failure to properly plead their claims as derivative actions, to exercise their statutory appraisal rights as the sole remedy for dissatisfaction with the proposed share price, and to overcome the business judgment rule with respect to their breach of fiduciary duty claims. The motions remain pending.

On July 16, 2013, the parties entered into a Memorandum of Understanding (“MOU”) agreeing in principle to settle the State Court Action on behalf of themselves and the putative settlement class, which includes all persons who owned any interest in the common stock of American Greetings Corporation (either of record or beneficially) at any time between and including September 26, 2012 and the effective date of the Merger. A Stipulation of Settlement subsequently was filed with the Cuyahoga County Court on August 8, 2013, and the Cuyahoga County Court preliminarily approved the settlement on August 15, 2013 (amended order dated September 4, 2013). The settlement provides for dismissal with prejudice of the State Court Action and a release of claims against defendants and released parties. As consideration to class members, the Corporation agreed to and did disclose additional information via a Form 8-K relating to the Merger, which was filed with the SEC on July 18, 2013. In addition, defendants acknowledge that the State Court Action contributed to the Weiss family Shareholders’ decision to increase the Merger consideration from $18.20 per share to $19.00 per share. The settlement also contemplates the payment of attorneys’ fees and reimbursement of expenses to class counsel, which the Corporation expects will be fully paid by the Corporation’s insurer.

On November 30, 2012, plaintiffs in the Wolfe and LMPERS Actions filed motions (1) to consolidate the Wolfe and LMPERS Actions, (2) for appointment as co-lead plaintiffs, (3) for appointment of co-lead counsel, and, in the Wolfe Action only, (4) for partial summary judgment. On December 14, 2012, the Corporation filed its oppositions to the motions (a) to consolidate the Wolfe and LMPERS Actions, (b) for appointment as co-lead plaintiffs, and (c) for appointment of co-lead counsel. On the same day, the Corporation also moved to dismiss both the Wolfe and LMPERS Actions. The Corporation answered both complaints on January 8, 2013, and on January 11, 2013, it filed its opposition to the motion for partial summary judgment. On February 14, 2013, the Federal Court dismissed both the Wolfe and LMPERS Actions for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. On March 15, 2013, plaintiffs in both the Wolfe and LMPERS Actions filed notices of appeal with the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals. On April 18, 2013, plaintiff Wolfe moved to dismiss his appeal, which motion was granted on April 19, 2013. On May 8, 2013, plaintiff LMPERS’ moved to dismiss its appeal as well, which motion was granted.

Plaintiffs in the Wolfe and LMPERS Actions alleged, in part, that Article Seventh of the Corporation’s articles of incorporation prohibited the special committee from, among other things, evaluating the merger. The Corporation considered these allegations and concluded that the Article is co-extensive with Ohio law and thus allows the Corporation to engage in any activity authorized by Ohio law. The Corporation also has consistently construed Article Seventh as permitting directors to approve a transaction so long as they are both disinterested and independent.

On April 17, 2013, R. David Wolfe filed a new derivative and putative class action (“Wolfe Action II”) in the Federal Court against the Corporation’s directors, certain members of the Weiss Family, and the Stone Entities, as well as the Corporation as a nominal defendant, challenging the Merger as financially and procedurally unfair to the Corporation and its minority shareholders. Mr. Wolfe subsequently filed an Amended Complaint on April 29, 2013. The Wolfe Action II sought a declaratory judgment that Article Seventh precludes the Board of Directors and special committee from approving the Merger. In addition, the Wolfe Action II included a derivative claim for breach of fiduciary duty against the Corporation’s directors for allegedly violating Article Seventh. Finally, the Wolfe Action II included both a derivative and class action claim for breach of fiduciary duty against the Weiss Family defendants and the Stone Entities for allegedly seeking to acquire the minority shareholders’ interests at an unfair price. Defendants filed their Motions to Dismiss the Wolfe Action II Amended Complaint on July 8, 2013. On August 1, 2013, the Federal Court granted the parties’ joint motion to defer briefing on defendants’ motions to dismiss and to stay the action pending resolution of the settlement of the State Court Action. Given the entry of Final Approval of the settlement of the State Court Action, the parties filed a Stipulation and Dismissal of the Wolfe Action II on December 23, 2013. The Federal Court entered the Dismissal of the Wolfe Action II on the same date.

~~In addition to the foregoing, we~~We are involved in various judicial, administrative, regulatory and arbitration proceedings concerning matters arising in the ordinary course of business operations, including, but not limited to, employment, commercial disputes and other contractual matters. We, however, do not believe that any of the litigation in which we are currently engaged, either individually or in the aggregate, will have a material adverse effect on our business, consolidated financial position or results of operations.

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.


One American Road, Cleveland, Ohio		44144
(Address of principal executive offices)		(Zip Code)


				Page Number

PART ~~I -~~ I—FINANCIAL INFORMATION

~~Item 1.~~	Item 1.	Financial Statements			3

~~Item 2.~~	Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations			2619

~~Item 3.~~	Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk			3927

~~Item 4.~~	Item 4.	Controls and Procedures			3928

PART ~~II -~~ II—OTHER INFORMATION

~~Item 1.~~	Item 1.	Legal Proceedings			4029

	Item 6.	Exhibits			29

~~Item 6.~~ SIGNATURES		~~Exhibits~~			43

~~SIGNATURES~~			4430

EXHIBITS


	(Unaudited)
	Nine Months Ended
	November 29, 2013			November 23, 2012
OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net income	$	31,477		$	2,187
Adjustments to reconcile net income to cash flows from operating activities:
Stock-based compensation		8,090			7,806
Net loss on disposal of fixed assets		559			394
Depreciation and intangible assets amortization		40,450			36,095
Provision for doubtful accounts		513			17,771
Clinton Cards secured debt (recovery) impairment		(4,232	)		10,043
Deferred income taxes		10,988			809
Gain related to Party City investment		(3,262	)		(4,293	)
Other non-cash charges		2,090			892
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of acquisitions:
Trade accounts receivable		(94,636	)		(101,363	)
Inventories		(43,588	)		(39,105	)
Other current assets		14,817			(17,877	)
Income taxes		6,465			(15,336	)
Deferred costs – net		15,021			23,702
Accounts payable and other liabilities		(21,935	)		112,283
Other – net		4,053			(1,913	)

Total Cash Flows From Operating Activities		(33,130	)		32,095

INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Property, plant and equipment additions		(45,336	)		(87,408	)
Cash payments for business acquisitions, net of cash acquired		—			621
Proceeds from sale of fixed assets		1,630			559
Purchase of Clinton Cards debt		—			(56,560	)
Proceeds from Clinton Cards administration		4,982			—
Proceeds related to Party City investment		12,105			4,920

Total Cash Flows From Investing Activities		(26,619	)		(137,868	)

FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Proceeds from revolving lines of credit		311,336			355,601
Repayments on revolving lines of credit		(295,236	)		(223,950	)
Proceeds from term loan		339,250			—
Issuance, exercise or settlement of share-based payment awards		(4,487	)		(496	)
Tax benefit (deficiency) from share-based payment awards		279			(376	)
Contribution from parent		240,000			—
Purchase of treasury shares		—			(78,742	)
Payments to shareholders to effect merger		(568,303	)		—
Dividends to shareholders		(27,809	)		(15,182	)
Debt issuance costs		(6,545	)		—

Total Cash Flows From Financing Activities		(11,515	)		36,855
EFFECT OF EXCHANGE RATE CHANGES ON CASH		980			(229	)


DECREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS		(70,284	)		(69,147	)

Cash and Cash Equivalents at Beginning of Year		86,059			132,438

Cash and Cash Equivalents at End of Period	$	15,775		$	63,291


	(Unaudited)
	Three Months Ended
	May 30, 2014			May 31, 2013
OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net income	$	43,739		$	33,393
Adjustments to reconcile net income to cash flows from operating activities:
Stock-based compensation		—			2,475
Net loss (gain) on disposal of fixed assets		23			(235	)
Depreciation and intangible assets amortization		15,222			13,057
Clinton Cards secured debt recovery		(3,390	)		(2,000	)
Provision for doubtful accounts		233			17
Deferred income taxes		(441	)		6,002
Other non-cash charges		1,063			306
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of acquisitions:
Trade accounts receivable		(32,066	)		(17,162	)
Inventories		(4,596	)		4,229
Other current assets		2,542			1,514
Income taxes		(8,785	)		11,313
Deferred costs – net		6,947			10,217
Accounts payable and other liabilities		(58,499	)		(42,446	)
Other – net		3,081			3,646

Total Cash Flows From Operating Activities		(34,927	)		24,326
INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Property, plant and equipment additions		(22,194	)		(15,472	)
Proceeds from sale of fixed assets		17			244
Proceeds from Clinton Cards administration		582			—

Total Cash Flows From Investing Activities		(21,595	)		(15,228	)
FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Proceeds from revolving line of credit and long-term borrowings		168,000			160,800
Repayments on revolving line of credit and long-term borrowings		(105,900	)		(186,900	)
Repayments on term loan		(5,000	)		—
Issuance or exercise of share-based payment awards		—			(390	)
Tax benefit from share-based payment awards		—			247
Dividends to shareholders		—			(4,784	)

Total Cash Flows From Financing Activities		57,100			(31,027	)
EFFECT OF EXCHANGE RATE CHANGES ON CASH		449			(133	)

INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS		1,027			(22,062	)
Cash and Cash Equivalents at Beginning of Year		63,963			86,059

Cash and Cash Equivalents at End of Period	$	64,990		$	63,997


															Accumulated
									Capital in						Other
	Common Shares								Excess of			Treasury			Comprehensive			Retained
	Common		Class A			Class B			Par Value			Stock			Loss			Earnings			Total
BALANCE MARCH 1, 2013	$	—	$	29,088		$	2,883		$	522,425		$	(1,093,782	)	$	(17,133	)	$	1,238,396		$	681,877
Net income		—		—			—			—			—			—			31,477			31,477
Other comprehensive income		—		—			—			—			—			9,341			—			9,341
Cash dividends to common shareholders - $.30 per share (pre-merger)		—		—			—			—			—			—			(9,614	)		(9,614	)
Cash dividends to parent		—		—			—			—			—			—			(18,195	)		(18,195	)
Sale of shares under benefit plans, including tax benefits		—		223			28			560			342			—			(1,080	)		73
Contribution from parent		—		—			—			240,000			—			—			—			240,000
Payments to shareholders to effect merger		—		(29,305	)		(606	)		—			(538,392	)		—			—			(568,303	)
Cancellation of Family Shareholders’ shares		—		(5	)		(2,307	)		—			—			—			2,312			—
Stock compensation expense		—		—			—			4,125			—			—			—			4,125
Stock grants and other		—		(1	)		2			2			25			—			(5	)		23
Conversion of restricted stock and performance share programs to cash-settled/liability-based		—		—			—			(6,498	)		—			—			—			(6,498	)
Settlement of stock options		—		—			—			(3,933	)		—			—			—			(3,933	)
Settlement of non-executive director awards		—		—			—			(371	)		—			—			—			(371	)
Cancellation of Family Shareholders’ restricted stock and performance shares		—		—			—			3,966			—			—			—			3,966
Cancellation of treasury shares		—		—			—			(520,276	)		1,631,807			—			(1,111,531	)		—

BALANCE NOVEMBER 29, 2013	$	—	$	—		$	—		$	240,000		$	—		$	(7,792	)	$	131,760		$	363,968


	Nine Months Ended
	November 29, 2013
(In millions)	Incremental compensation expense		Transaction- related costs		Total
Administrative and general expenses	$	10.4	$	17.4	$	27.8


(In millions)	Contract asset impairment		Bad debt expense		Legal and advisory fees		Impairment of debt purchased		Total
Net sales	$	4.0	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	4.0
Administrative and general expenses		—		17.2		6.3		—		23.5
Other operating (income) expense - net		—		—		—		10.0		10.0

	$	4.0	$	17.2	$	6.3	$	10.0	$	37.5


Purchase price (in millions):
Credit bid	$	37.2
Effective settlement of pre-existing relationships with the legacy Clinton Cards business		6.4
Cash acquired		(0.6	)

	$	43.0

Allocation (in millions):
Inventory	$	5.5
Property, plant and equipment		18.4
Intangible assets		22.5
Current liabilities assumed		(3.4	)

	$	43.0


	Defined Benefit Pension
	Three Months Ended						Nine Months Ended
(In thousands)	November 29, 2013			November 23, 2012			November 29, 2013			November 23, 2012
Service cost	$	315		$	386		$	955		$	1,053
Interest cost		1,766			1,864			5,244			5,547
Expected return on plan assets		(1,577	)		(1,632	)		(4,718	)		(4,854	)
Amortization of prior service cost		68			61			170			184
Amortization of actuarial loss		871			1,005			2,701			2,636

	$	1,443		$	1,684		$	4,352		$	4,566


Exhibit Number		Description

10.1		Executive Incentive Plan (Fiscal Year ~~2014)~~2015 and Fiscal Year 2016 Description).

~~10.2~~		~~Long-Term Incentive Plan (FY14 - FY15 - FY16)~~

~~10.3~~		~~FY2014-16 Long-Term Incentive Plan Enhancement Program~~

~~31 (a)~~31(a)		Certification of ~~co-Chief~~Co-Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

~~31 (b)~~31(b)		Certification of ~~co-Chief~~Co-Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

~~31 (c)~~31(c)		Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

32		Certification of ~~co-Chief~~Co-Chief Executive Officers and Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

101		The following materials from the Corporation’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended ~~November 29, 2013,~~May 30, 2014, formatted in XBRL (Extensible Business Reporting Language): (i) Consolidated Statement of ~~Operations~~Income for the quarters ended ~~November 29,~~May 30, 2014 and May 31, 2013, ~~and November 23, 2012,~~ (ii) Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income (Loss) ~~Income~~ for the quarters ended ~~November 29,~~May 30, 2014 and May 31, 2013, ~~and November 23, 2012,~~ (iii) Consolidated Statement of Financial Position at ~~November 29, 2013,~~May 30, 2014, February 28, ~~2013~~2014 and ~~November 23, 2012,~~May 31, 2013, (iv) Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows for the ~~nine months~~quarters ended ~~November 29,~~May 30, 2014 and May 31, 2013, and ~~November 23, 2012,~~ (v) ~~Consolidated Statement of Shareholder’s Equity for the nine month period ended November 29, 2013 and (vi)~~ Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for the quarter ended ~~November 29, 2013.~~May 30, 2014.


AMERICAN GREETINGS CORPORATION

By:		/s/ Robert D. Tyler
		Robert D. Tyler
		Corporate Controller and
		Chief Accounting Officer *

Large accelerated filer

Accelerated filer

Non-accelerated filer

¨x (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Smaller reporting company