(Address, including zip code, and telephone number, including area code, of registrant’s principal executive offices)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No x

The number of shares outstanding of the registrant’s common stock outstanding as of ~~June~~September 30, 2014 was ~~51,482,390.~~51,950,714.

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. All statements contained in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q other than statements of historical fact, including statements regarding our future results of operations and financial position, our business strategy and plans, and our objectives for future operations, are forward-looking statements. The words “believe,” “may,” “will,” “potentially,” “estimate,” “continue,” “anticipate,” “intend,” “could,” “would,” “project,” “plan,” “expect” and the negative and plural forms of these words and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, statements concerning the following:

We have based these forward-looking statements largely on our current expectations and projections about future events and trends that we believe may affect our financial condition, results of operations, business strategy, short-term and long-term business operations and

objectives and financial needs; however, these forward-looking statements are subject to a number of risks, uncertainties and assumptions, including those described in Part I, Item 1A, of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended February 28, 2014. Moreover, we operate in a very competitive and rapidly changing environment and new risks emerge from time to time. It is not possible for us to predict all risks, nor can we assess the impact of all factors on our business or the extent to which any factor, or combination of factors, may cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in any forward-looking statements we may make. In light of these risks, uncertainties and assumptions, the future events and trends discussed in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q may not occur and actual results could differ materially and adversely from those anticipated or implied in the forward-looking statements.

We undertake no obligation to revise or publicly release the results of any revision to these forward-looking statements, except as required by law. Given these risks and uncertainties, readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on such forward-looking statements. You should read this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and the documents that we reference in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and have filed with the SEC as exhibits to this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q with the understanding that our actual future results, levels of activity, performance and events and circumstances may be materially different from what we expect.

Unless expressly indicated or the context requires otherwise, the terms “we,” “our,” “us,” “Barracuda” and “the Company” in this document refer to Barracuda Networks, Inc., a Delaware corporation, and, where appropriate, its wholly owned subsidiaries. The term “Barracuda” may also refer to our products, regardless of the manner in which they are accessed.


	May 31, 2014			February 28, 2014			August 31, 2014			February 28, 2014
Assets
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	141,558		$	135,879		$	156,559		$	135,879
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $2,194 and $2,134 as of May 31, 2014 and February 28, 2014, respectively		32,965			27,836
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $1,367 and $2,134 as of August 31, 2014 and February 28, 2014, respectively								36,739			27,836
Inventories, net		4,918			5,648			5,183			5,648
Prepaid income taxes		1,222			1,147			1,337			1,147
Deferred costs		27,003			25,707			28,157			25,707
Deferred income taxes		31,940			30,156			33,840			30,156
Other current assets		3,853			3,753			4,300			3,753

Total current assets		243,459			230,126			266,115			230,126
Property and equipment, net		21,317			20,558			22,230			20,558
Deferred costs, non-current		25,546			24,572			26,425			24,572
Deferred income taxes, non-current		29,985			28,515			31,198			28,515
Other non-current assets		2,461			1,851			2,033			1,851
Intangible assets, net		7,440			8,420			10,652			8,420
Goodwill		35,969			36,014			41,025			36,014

Total assets	$	366,177		$	350,056		$	399,678		$	350,056

Liabilities and stockholders’ equity (deficit)
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable	$	9,502		$	13,743		$	12,708		$	13,743
Accrued payroll and related benefits		7,797			8,494			8,048			8,494
Other accrued liabilities		8,646			9,374			10,473			9,374
Deferred revenue		177,472			167,562			187,153			167,562
Deferred income taxes		260			260			291			260
Note payable		240			237			244			237

Total current liabilities		203,917			199,670			218,917			199,670
Long-term liabilities:
Deferred revenue, non-current		151,016			145,595			156,525			145,595
Deferred income taxes, non-current		83			84			951			84
Note payable, non-current		4,572			4,635			4,510			4,635
Other long-term liabilities		5,748			5,727			7,664			5,727
Commitments and contingencies (Note 7)
Commitments and contingencies (Note 8)
Stockholders’ equity (deficit):
Preferred stock, $0.001 par value; 20,000,000 shares authorized; zero shares issued and outstanding as of May 31, 2014 and February 28, 2014		—			—
Common stock, $0.001 par value; 1,000,000,000 shares authorized; 51,430,238 and 51,045,196 shares issued and outstanding as of May 31, 2014 and February 28, 2014, respectively		52			52
Preferred stock, $0.001 par value; 20,000,000 shares authorized; zero shares issued and outstanding as of August 31, 2014 and February 28, 2014								—			—
Common stock, $0.001 par value; 1,000,000,000 shares authorized; 51,920,115 and 51,045,196 shares issued and outstanding as of August 31, 2014 and February 28, 2014, respectively								52			52
Additional paid-in capital		284,865			278,551			295,003			278,551
Accumulated other comprehensive loss		(786	)		(817	)		(1,392	)		(817	)
Accumulated deficit		(283,290	)		(283,441	)		(282,552	)		(283,441	)

Total stockholders’ equity (deficit)		841			(5,655	)		11,111			(5,655	)

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity (deficit)	$	366,177		$	350,056		$	399,678		$	350,056


	Three Months Ended May 31,						Three Months Ended August 31,						Six Months Ended August 31,
	2014			2013			2014			2013			2014			2013
Revenue:
Appliance	$	20,836		$	17,503		$	20,676		$	17,906		$	41,512		$	35,409
Subscription		45,373			38,774			47,976			39,884			93,349			78,658

Total revenue		66,209			56,277			68,652			57,790			134,861			114,067
Cost of revenue		14,406			13,074			14,044			13,407			28,450			26,481

Gross profit		51,803			43,203			54,608			44,383			106,411			87,586
Operating expenses:
Research and development		12,952			10,842			13,826			11,638			26,778			22,480
Sales and marketing		29,479			28,836			31,031			28,392			60,510			57,228
General and administrative		8,564			6,678			8,624			7,827			17,188			14,505

Total operating expenses		50,995			46,356			53,481			47,857			104,476			94,213

Income (loss) from operations		808			(3,153	)		1,127			(3,474	)		1,935			(6,627	)
Other expense, net		(57	)		(457	)
Other income (expense), net								(681	)		7			(738	)		(450	)

Income (loss) before income taxes and non-controlling interest		751			(3,610	)		446			(3,467	)		1,197			(7,077	)
Benefit (provision) for income taxes		(600	)		1,047			292			1,089			(308	)		2,136

Consolidated net income (loss)		151			(2,563	)		738			(2,378	)		889			(4,941	)
Net loss attributable to non-controlling interest		—			159			—			203			—			362

Net income (loss) attributable to Barracuda Networks, Inc. (Note 8)	$	151		$	(2,404	)
Net income (loss) attributable to Barracuda Networks, Inc.							$	738		$	(2,175	)	$	889		$	(4,579	)

Net income (loss) per share attributable to Barracuda Networks, Inc.:
Basic	$	0.00		$	(0.09	)	$	0.01		$	(0.08	)	$	0.02		$	(0.16	)
Diluted	$	0.00		$	(0.09	)	$	0.01		$	(0.08	)	$	0.02		$	(0.16	)
Weighted-average shares used to compute net income (loss) per share attributable to Barracuda Networks, Inc.:
Basic		51,156			28,100			51,667			28,182			51,412			28,141
Diluted		53,605			28,100			53,743			28,182			53,675			28,141


	Three Months Ended May 31,					Three Months Ended August 31,						Six Months Ended August 31,
	2014		2013			2014			2013			2014			2013
Net income (loss) attributable to Barracuda Networks, Inc.	$	151	$	(2,404	)	$	738		$	(2,175	)	$	889		$	(4,579	)
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax:
Change in net foreign currency translation adjustment		31		(315	)		(606	)		281			(575	)		(34	)
Available-for-sale investments:
Change in net unrealized gains (losses) (net of tax effect of $0 and $41)		—		(67	)
Change in net unrealized gains (losses) (net of tax effect of $0, $85, $0 and $126)							—			(138	)		—			(205	)
Less: reclassification adjustment for net (gains) losses included in net income		—		—			—			—			—			—

Net change		—		(67	)		—			(138	)		—			(205	)

Other comprehensive income (loss)		31		(382	)		(606	)		143			(575	)		(239	)

Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to Barracuda Networks, Inc.	$	182	$	(2,786	)	$	132		$	(2,032	)	$	314		$	(4,818	)


	Three Months Ended May 31,						Six Months Ended August 31,
	2014			2013			2014			2013
Operating activities
Consolidated net income (loss)	$	151		$	(2,563	)	$	889		$	(4,941	)
Adjustments to reconcile consolidated net income (loss) to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization		2,087			2,245			4,422			4,734
Stock-based compensation		3,082			2,497			6,818			5,128
Excess tax benefits from equity incentive plan		(1,772	)		(11	)		(4,338	)		(226	)
Loss on disposal of property and equipment		12			14			31			36
Deferred income taxes		(3,254	)		47			(6,198	)		(5,467	)
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable, net		(5,094	)		(1,200	)		(8,527	)		(1,016	)
Inventories, net		730			(363	)		463			(1,515	)
Income taxes, net		1,024			(4,746	)		3,073			(514	)
Deferred costs		(2,282	)		(3,086	)		(4,412	)		(6,588	)
Other current assets		(29	)		(513	)		(247	)		(902	)
Other non-current assets		(1	)		(207	)		100			211
Accounts payable		(4,579	)		(3,490	)		(1,267	)		(264	)
Accrued payroll and related benefits		23			(1,119	)		(29	)		(1,883	)
Other accrued liabilities		(52	)		(554	)		476			(303	)
Other long-term liabilities		21			21			55			71
Deferred revenue		15,340			13,222			29,573			25,522

Net cash provided by operating activities		5,407			194			20,882			12,083
Investing activities
Purchase of investment in non-marketable equity and debt securities		(600	)		—			(600	)		(310	)
Purchase of property and equipment		(1,589	)		(1,663	)		(3,775	)		(4,529	)
Purchase of intangible assets								—			(28	)
Business combinations, net of cash acquired		—			(6,176	)		(4,791	)		(8,475	)

Net cash used in investing activities		(2,189	)		(7,839	)		(9,166	)		(13,342	)
Financing activities
Proceeds from issuance of common stock		2,340			7			7,246			441
Taxes paid related to net share settlement of equity awards		(1,125	)		(465	)		(2,340	)		(1,191	)
Dividends paid		—			(1,419	)		—			(1,419	)
Repurchase of common stock		—			(138	)		—			(723	)
Excess tax benefits from equity incentive plan		1,772			11			4,338			226
Extended (repayment of) employee loans		(463	)		246			(70	)		3,119
Repayment of note payable		(60	)		(56	)		(118	)		(111	)
Transaction costs related to initial public offering								—			(147	)

Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities		2,464			(1,814	)
Net cash provided by financing activities								9,056			195
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents		(3	)		(105	)		(92	)		(35	)

Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents		5,679			(9,564	)		20,680			(1,099	)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period		135,879			30,095			135,879			30,095

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	141,558		$	20,531		$	156,559		$	28,996

Barracuda Networks, Inc., also referred to in this report as “we,” “our,” “us,” “Barracuda” or “the Company,” is headquartered in Campbell, California, and designs and delivers powerful yet easy-to-use security and storage solutions. We offer cloud-connected solutions that help our customers address security threats, improve network performance and protect and store their data. Our solutions are designed to simplify IT operations for our customers, allowing them to enhance their return on technology investments.

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States (“GAAP”) requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period. We evaluate our estimates on an ongoing basis, including those related to the fair values of stock-based awards, income taxes and contingent liabilities, among others. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that we believe to be reasonable, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with GAAP, and follow the requirements of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) for interim reporting. As permitted under those rules, certain footnotes or other financial information that are normally required by GAAP are condensed or omitted. In management’s opinion, the unaudited condensed financial statements have been prepared on the same basis as the audited financial statements and include all adjustments, which include only normal recurring adjustments, necessary for the fair presentation of our financial information. The results for the three and six months ended ~~May~~August 31, 2014 are not necessarily indicative of the results expected for the full fiscal year. The condensed consolidated balance sheet as of February 28, 2014 has been derived from audited financial statements at that date but does not include all of the information required by GAAP.

The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Barracuda Networks, Inc. and our wholly and majority-owned subsidiaries. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated.

The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements and related financial information should be read in conjunction with the audited financial statements and related footnotes included in our most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K. There have been no material changes in our significant accounting policies from those that were disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended February 28, 2014.

We have reclassified certain immaterial prior period amounts within our condensed consolidated statements of cash flows to conform to our current fiscal year presentation.

In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (the “FASB”) issued an accounting standard which completes the joint effort by the FASB and the International Accounting Standards Board to clarify the principles for recognizing revenue and improve financial reporting by creating common revenue recognition guidance for GAAP and International Financial Reporting Standards. The core principle of this update is that an entity should recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. ~~This~~We intend to adopt this update ~~will effect for us beginning~~ in the first quarter of fiscal year 2018 ~~and~~at which point it will begin to affect us. The standard allows for full retrospective adoption applied to all periods presented or retrospective adoption with the cumulative effect of initially applying this update recognized at the date of initial application. ~~The method of adoption has not been determined yet by us.~~ We are currently evaluating the impact of adopting this update on our consolidated financial statements.


	May 31, 2014		February 28, 2014		August 31, 2014		February 28, 2014
Cash	$	46,954	$	41,331	$	61,904	$	41,331
Money market funds		94,604		94,548		94,655		94,548

	$	141,558	$	135,879	$	156,559	$	135,879

We determine ~~the~~ fair ~~values of our financial instruments~~value based on the fair value hierarchy, which requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. The fair value assumes that the transaction to sell the asset or transfer the liability occurs in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability and establishes that the fair value of an asset or liability shall be determined based on the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability. The classification of a financial asset or liability within the hierarchy is based upon the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement. The fair value hierarchy prioritizes the inputs into three levels that may be used to measure fair value:

Cash equivalents are classified within Level 1 because they are valued using quoted market prices or alternative pricing sources and models utilizing market observable inputs. We have no financial assets or liabilities measured, on a recurring basis, utilizing Level 2 inputs. We estimated the fair value of our Level 3 contingent consideration liability based a weighted probability assessment of achieving the earnout related to the acquisition of C2C Systems Limited (“C2C”). Significant increases (decreases) in the probability assumptions in isolation would result in a significantly higher (lower) fair value measurement. In developing these estimates, we considered unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and reflect our own assumptions. Refer to Note 3 ~~inputs.~~to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for further information.

~~Financial~~The following table summarizes, for assets or liabilities measured at fair value, ~~on a recurring basis are summarized below~~the respective classification by level of input within the fair value hierarchy (in thousands):


	May 31, 2014								August 31, 2014
	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total
Cash equivalents:
Money market funds	$	94,604	$	—	$	—	$	94,604	$	94,655	$	—	$	—	$	94,655
Other accrued liabilities (current):
Contingent consideration liability									$	—	$	—	$	1,035	$	1,035
Other long-term liabilities:
Contingent consideration liability									$	—	$	—	$	1,889	$	1,889

	February 28, 2014								February 28, 2014
	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total
Cash equivalents:
Money market funds	$	94,548	$	—	$	—	$	94,548	$	94,548	$	—	$	—	$	94,548


	August 31, 2014			February 28, 2014
Raw materials	$	2,677		$	3,038
Finished goods		3,500			3,759
Reserves		(994	)		(1,149	)

	$	5,183		$	5,648


	May 31, 2014		February 28, 2014		August 31, 2014		February 28, 2014
Appliance	$	37,033	$	35,000	$	38,491	$	35,000
Commissions		15,516		15,279		16,091		15,279

	$	52,549	$	50,279	$	54,582	$	50,279


	May 31, 2014			February 28, 2014			August 31, 2014			February 28, 2014
Land	$	5,100		$	5,100		$	5,100		$	5,100
Building		6,549			6,549			6,549			6,549
Computer hardware and software		13,015			11,711			14,796			11,711
Vehicles, machinery and equipment		2,471			2,462			2,685			2,462
Leasehold improvements		2,996			2,560			2,989			2,560

		30,131			28,382			32,119			28,382
Accumulated depreciation and amortization		(8,814	)		(7,824	)		(9,889	)		(7,824	)

	$	21,317		$	20,558		$	22,230		$	20,558

Depreciation and amortization expense related to property and equipment was ~~$1.1~~$1.2 million and ~~$0.8~~$2.3 million for the three and six months ended ~~May~~August 31, 2014, respectively, and $0.8 million and $1.6 million for the three and six months ended August 31, 2013, respectively.

The components of accumulated other comprehensive ~~income (loss),~~loss, net of tax, were as follows (in thousands):


	Foreign Currency Translation Adjustments			Unrealized Gains (Losses) on Available-for- Sale Investments			Total			Foreign Currency Translation Adjustments			Unrealized Gains (Losses) on Available-for- Sale Investments		Total
Balance as of February 28, 2014	$	(817	)	$	—		$	(817	)	$	(817	)	$	—	$	(817	)
Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications		31			—			31			(575	)		—		(575	)
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)		—			—			—			—			—		—

Other comprehensive income (loss)		31			—			31			(575	)		—		(575	)

Balance as of May 31, 2014	$	(786	)	$	—		$	(786	)
Balance as of August 31, 2014										$	(1,392	)	$	—	$	(1,392	)


	Foreign Currency Translation Adjustments			Unrealized Gains (Losses) on Available-for- Sale Investments			Total
Balance as of February 28, 2013	$	(1,169	)	$	57		$	(1,112	)
Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications		(315	)		(67	)		(382	)
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)		—			—			—

Other comprehensive income (loss)		(315	)		(67	)		(382	)

Balance as of May 31, 2013	$	(1,484	)	$	(10	)	$	(1,494	)

In August 2014, we completed our acquisition of C2C, a provider of personal storage table file (“PST”) management, email archiving and information management solutions based in the United Kingdom. The acquisition of C2C will better position us to offer customers a more complete archiving and information management product portfolio to simplify IT and control storage costs. We acquired all of the issued and outstanding stock of C2C for aggregate consideration of $9.6 million. In connection with the acquisition, contingent consideration is payable up to $4.9 million upon the attainment of certain billings levels and performance integration targets through August 2017. At the acquisition date, we estimated fair value for contingent consideration to be $2.9 million.

We recorded the assets acquired and liabilities assumed from C2C, with the difference between the fair value of the net assets acquired and the purchase consideration reflected as goodwill. The following table reflects the fair values of assets acquired and liabilities assumed as of the acquisition date (in thousands):

The fair values of assets acquired and liabilities assumed were based on a preliminary valuation and our estimates and assumptions are subject to change within the measurement period. The primary areas of the purchase price allocation that are not yet finalized are related to accrued expenses, income taxes and residual goodwill.

As of the acquisition date, developed technology, customer relationships and the C2C trade name had weighted-average useful lives of 6.4 years, 7.3 years and 2.0 years, respectively. The total weighted-average useful life of these acquired intangible assets is 6.7 years. The goodwill is primarily attributed to the synergies expected to be realized following the acquisition. No goodwill was deemed to be deductible for income tax purposes. Pro forma results of operations for C2C have not been presented because they are not material to our consolidated results of operations.

The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill are summarized as follows (in thousands):


	May 31,			August 31,
	2014			2014
Balance at February 28, 2014	$	36,014		$	36,014
Goodwill acquired					5,376
Effect of foreign exchange rates		(45	)		(365	)

Balance at May 31, 2014	$	35,969
Balance at August 31, 2014				$	41,025

Intangible assets subject to amortization are summarized as follows (in thousands):


	May 31, 2014							August 31, 2014
	Gross Carrying Amount		Accumulated Amortization			Net Carrying Value		Gross Carrying Amount		Accumulated Amortization			Net Carrying Value
Acquired developed technology	$	26,300	$	(21,860	)	$	4,440	$	29,184	$	(22,517	)	$	6,667
Software license		400		(400	)		—		400		(400	)		—
Customer relationships		7,448		(5,939	)		1,509		8,677		(6,016	)		2,661
Patents		1,625		(919	)		706		1,625		(965	)		660
Trade name		663		(315	)		348
Trade names									513		(145	)		368
Acquired developed software		200		(200	)		—		200		(200	)		—

	$	36,636	$	(29,633	)	$	7,003	$	40,599	$	(30,243	)	$	10,356


	February 28, 2014							February 28, 2014
	Gross Carrying Amount		Accumulated Amortization			Net Carrying Value		Gross Carrying Amount		Accumulated Amortization			Net Carrying Value
Acquired developed technology	$	26,315	$	(21,111	)	$	5,204	$	26,315	$	(21,111	)	$	5,204
Software license		400		(400	)		—		400		(400	)		—
Customer relationships		7,463		(5,794	)		1,669		7,463		(5,794	)		1,669
Patents		1,625		(873	)		752		1,625		(873	)		752
Trade name		663		(305	)		358
Trade names									663		(305	)		358
Acquired developed software		200		(200	)		—		200		(200	)		—

	$	36,666	$	(28,683	)	$	7,983	$	36,666	$	(28,683	)	$	7,983

In addition to the above, we maintained other intangible assets not subject to amortization of $296,000 and $437,000 as of ~~May~~August 31, 2014 and February 28, ~~2014.~~2014, respectively.

Amortization expense was ~~$1.0~~$1.1 million and ~~$1.4~~$2.1 million for the three and six months ended ~~May~~August 31, 2014, respectively, and $1.7 million and $3.1 million for the three and six months ended August 31, 2013, respectively.

As of ~~May~~August 31, 2014, amortization expense for intangible assets in future periods was as follows: ~~$2.0~~$1.4 million for the remainder of fiscal year 2015, ~~$1.7~~$2.4 million for fiscal year 2016, ~~$1.5~~$2.2 million for fiscal year 2017, ~~$1.2~~$1.9 million for fiscal year 2018, ~~$0.3~~$1.0 million for fiscal year 2019 and ~~$0.3~~$1.6 million thereafter.

Our 2012 Equity Incentive Plan (the “2012 Plan”) authorized the board of directors to grant stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock and restricted stock units (“RSUs”) to employees, directors and consultants. Options granted are exercisable for periods not to exceed 10 years. Options and RSUs granted vest over four years contingent upon employment or service with us onthrough the vesting date.

As of ~~May~~August 31, 2014, net of forecasted forfeitures, there was ~~$13.9~~$19.1 million of unrecognized compensation cost related to outstanding stock options, expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of ~~2.65~~2.89 years and ~~$14.9~~$20.6 million of unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested RSUs, expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of ~~2.72~~3.00 years. To the extent the actual forfeiture rate is different from what management has anticipated, stock-based compensation related to these equity awards will be different from management’s expectations.

Total stock-based compensation expense has been classified as follows in the accompanying condensed consolidated statements of operations (in thousands):


	Three Months Ended May 31,				Three Months Ended August 31,				Six Months Ended August 31,
	2014		2013		2014		2013		2014		2013
Cost of revenue	$	52	$	45	$	73	$	43	$	125	$	88
Research and development		748		630		902		635		1,650		1,265
Sales and marketing		582		334		821		366		1,403		700
General and administrative		1,700		1,488		1,940		1,587		3,640		3,075

	$	3,082	$	2,497	$	3,736	$	2,631	$	6,818	$	5,128

For the three and six months ended ~~May~~August 31, 2014, ~~and 2013,~~ we recorded an income tax ~~provision~~benefit of ~~$0.6~~$0.3 million and income tax ~~benefit~~provision of ~~$1.0~~$0.3 million, respectively. For the three and six months ended August 31, 2013, we recorded income tax benefits of $1.1 million and $2.1 million, respectively.

The difference between the income tax benefit (provision) that would be derived by applying the statutory rate to our year-to-date income (loss) before tax and the income tax benefit (provision) actually recorded is primarily due to the impact of non-deductible stock-based compensation expenses and other currently non-deductible items and various discrete items.


	Three Months Ended May 31,				Three Months Ended August 31,				Six Months Ended August 31,
	2014		2013		2014		2013		2014		2013
North America	$	48,319	$	40,832	$	50,219	$	41,997	$	98,538	$	82,829
United States		45,330		38,237		47,234		39,291		92,564		77,528
Other		2,989		2,595		2,985		2,706		5,974		5,301
Latin America		809		975		786		961		1,595		1,936
Asia-Pacific		4,487		4,049		4,503		4,093		8,990		8,142
EMEA		12,594		10,421		13,144		10,739		25,738		21,160

	$	66,209	$	56,277	$	68,652	$	57,790	$	134,861	$	114,067

Our chief operating decision maker reviews the financial information presented on a consolidated basis for the purposes of allocating resources and evaluating our financial performance. Accordingly, we have determined that we operate in a single reporting segment.

In late 2011, following a voluntary internal review of our compliance with U.S. export control and sanctions laws, our management team became aware that certain of our physical appliances had been sold indirectly into embargoed countries via our distributors and resellers, potentially in violation of U.S. export control and economic sanctions laws. In addition, certain of our solutions incorporate encryption components and may be exported from the U.S. only with the required approvals; in the past, we may have exported products prior to receiving these required authorizations. After completion of a comprehensive internal investigation conducted by outside counsel, we submitted voluntary disclosures regarding these matters to the U.S. Commerce Department, Bureau of Industry and Security (“BIS”), and to the U.S. Treasury Department, Office of Foreign Assets Control (“OFAC”). These disclosures summarized potential violations of export controls and

economic sanctions laws, including reexports by third parties and provision of services to end users in embargoed countries including Iran, Sudan and Syria. ~~If we are found~~

The Company received a Proposed Charging Letter from BIS on August 21, 2014 (“Letter”), which asserts certain export violations against the Company and its UK subsidiary. Based on discussions with BIS, the Company expects a one-time monetary penalty to ~~have violated U.S.~~be imposed, and does not currently expect any criminal charges, denial of export ~~control laws, we may~~privileges, or ongoing monitoring actions. As requested by BIS in the Letter, the Company has contacted BIS within thirty days of the date of the Letter to indicate that supplemental information will be ~~subject~~provided by the Company. The Company intends to ~~various penalties available under~~continue cooperating with BIS in an effort to resolve this matter. However, given the ~~laws,~~early stage of our discussions, the Company is unable at this time to estimate the timing or amount of ~~which is currently not estimable.~~any final resolution.

On August 13, 2013, Parallel Networks, LLC (“Parallel Networks”), which we believe is a non-practicing entity, filed a lawsuit against us in the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware, Parallel Networks, LLC v. Barracuda Networks, Inc.,Case No. 1:13-cv-01412-UNA, alleging that certain of our appliances infringe two of their U.S. patents: U.S. Pat. No. 7,571,217, titled “Method and System for Uniform Resource Locator Transformation,” and U.S. Pat. No. 8,352,570, titled “Method and System for Uniform Resource Locator Transformation.” Parallel Networks has asserted similar claims against other companies. This matter is in its early stages, but we intend to vigorously defend the lawsuit. Given the early stage of the litigation, we are unable to estimate a possible loss or range of possible loss, if any.

On April 23, 2014, Selene Communication Technologies, LLC (“Selene”) filed a lawsuit against us in the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware, Selene Communication Technologies, LLC v. Barracuda Networks, Inc., Case No. 1:99-mc-09999, alleging that certain of our appliances infringe U.S. patent number 7,143,444, titled “Application-Layer Anomaly and Misuse Detection.” ~~Selene has asserted similar claims against other companies. This matter is in its early stages, but we intend to vigorously defend the lawsuit. Given the early stage~~Dismissal of the ~~litigation, we are unable~~lawsuit with prejudice is pending. The Company did not incur any loss related to ~~estimate a possible loss or range of possible loss, if any.~~this matter.

From time to time, we are party to litigation and subject to claims that arise in the ordinary course of our business, including actions with respect to employment claims and other matters. Although the results of litigation and claims are inherently unpredictable, we believe that the final outcome of such matters will not have a material adverse effect on our business, consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

Basic and diluted net income (loss) per share attributable to common stockholders was presented in conformity with the two-class method required for participating securities. Prior to the date of our initial public offering, we considered our Series A and Series B redeemable convertible preferred stock as participating securities. In the event a dividend was declared or paid on our common stock, holders of Series A and Series B redeemable convertible preferred stock were entitled to a proportionate share of such dividend in proportion to the holders of common stock on an as-if converted basis. Immediately after the completion of our initial public offering in November 2013, all outstanding shares of redeemable convertible preferred stock were converted into common stock.

Through the date of our initial public offering, we utilized the two-class method to compute net income (loss) per share. Under the two-class method, basic net income (loss) per share attributable to common stockholders was computed by dividing the net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders was determined by allocating undistributed earnings between common and redeemable convertible preferred stockholders. Diluted net income (loss) per share attributable to common stockholders was computed by using the weighted-average number of shares of common stock outstanding, including potential dilutive common shares assuming the dilutive effect of outstanding stock options, RSUs, common stock subject to repurchase or forfeiture and redeemable convertible preferred stock using the treasury stock method. For periods in which there was a net loss, the number of shares used in the computation of diluted net loss per share was the same as that used for the computation of basic net loss per share, as the inclusion of dilutive securities would be anti-dilutive. Under the two-class method, the net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders was not allocated to the convertible redeemable preferred stock as the convertible redeemable preferred stock did not have a contractual obligation to share in our losses.

The following table presents the calculation of basic and diluted net income (loss) per share attributable to Barracuda Networks, Inc. (in thousands, except per share amounts):


	Three Months Ended May 31,					Three Months Ended August 31,					Six Months Ended August 31,
	2014		2013			2014		2013			2014		2013
Basic:
Net income (loss) attributable to Barracuda Networks, Inc.	$	151	$	(2,404	)	$	738	$	(2,175	)	$	889	$	(4,579	)
Weighted-average shares used to compute net income (loss) per share, basic		51,156		28,100			51,667		28,182			51,412		28,141

Net income (loss) per share attributable to Barracuda Networks, Inc., basic	$	0.00	$	(0.09	)	$	0.01	$	(0.08	)	$	0.02	$	(0.16	)

Diluted:
Net income (loss) attributable to Barracuda Networks, Inc.	$	151	$	(2,404	)	$	738	$	(2,175	)	$	889	$	(4,579	)
Weighted-average shares used to compute net income (loss) per share, basic		51,156		28,100			51,667		28,182			51,412		28,141
Add weighted-average effect of dilutive securities:
Stock options and RSUs		2,449		—			2,076		—			2,263		—

Weighted-average shares used to compute net income (loss) per share, diluted		53,605		28,100			53,743		28,182			53,675		28,141

Net income (loss) per share attributable to Barracuda Networks, Inc., diluted	$	0.00	$	(0.09	)	$	0.01	$	(0.08	)	$	0.02	$	(0.16	)

Item 2.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

You should read the following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations together with the condensed consolidated financial statements and related notes that are included elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended February 28, 2014. The last day of our fiscal year is February 28/29. Our fiscal quarters end on May 31, August 31, November 30 and February 28/29. This discussion contains forward-looking statements based upon current expectations that involve risks and uncertainties. Our actual results may differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements as a result of various factors, including those set forth in Part I, Item 1A, of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended February 28, 2014.

Barracuda designs and delivers powerful yet easy-to-use security and storage solutions. We offer cloud-connected solutions that help our customers address security threats, improve network performance and protect and store their data. Our solutions are designed to simplify IT operations for our customers, allowing them to enhance their return on technology investment. Our business model is built on the core values of speed and agility, which we apply to all aspects of our approach, including our technology innovations, the delivery and deployment of our solutions and responses to customer inquiries.

We derive revenue from sales of appliances and subscriptions. Revenue from the sale of our appliances includes hardware and a perpetual license. Subscription revenue is generated primarily from our subscription services such as our Barracuda Energize Updates as well as our cloud solutions. Subscription revenue also includes revenue from fixed term licenses of our virtual appliance software support and maintenance. Our subscription terms range from one to five years, the substantial majority of which are for one-year periods. Subscriptions are billed in advance of the purchased subscription period. ~~Renewal rates from subscriptions, on a dollars basis, have been 94% and 97% for the three months ended May 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively.~~

The growth of our business and our future success depend on many factors, including our ability to continue to expand our customer base, pursue cross-sale opportunities and grow revenues from our existing customer base, expand our distribution channels, particularly internationally, and continue to develop new solutions to promptly respond to our customers’ needs. Our sales and marketing initiatives are primarily focused on higher-growth segments within the security and storage markets, such as next generation firewall appliances and purpose-built backup appliances. Although the mix of solutions sold can vary from period to period, in recent periods we have experienced stronger growth in sales of storage and application security solutions. Our future success will depend in part on our ability to continue to expand our sales in these higher-growth segments. While these areas represent significant opportunities for us, they also pose risks and challenges that we must successfully address in order to sustain the growth of our business and improve our operating results.

We invoice at the time of sale for the total price of the solutions we deliver, and we typically collect cash in 30 to 60 days. We refer to the total amount of invoices we issue in a period as gross billings. All of the gross billings we record are recognized as revenue ratably under GAAP, once all revenue recognition criteria have been met. Gross billings are initially recorded as deferred revenue, less reserves. The appliance component of our gross billings is recognized ratably as revenue over the estimated customer relationship period, which is typically three years, commencing upon the activation of the unit by the end customer. The subscription component of our gross billings is recognized ratably as revenue over the contractual period of the subscription. Because we bill in advance for the entire term, substantially all of our new and renewal gross billings increase our deferred revenue balance, which contributes significantly to our cash flow.

We believe that our future success will be dependent on many factors, including our ability to increase sales of our solutions to new customers as well as to increase sales of additional solutions to our existing customers and to add incremental capabilities that will solve emerging customer issues. While these areas present significant opportunity, they also present risks that we must manage to ensure successful results. Additionally, we face significant competition across all of our market segments and must continue to execute across all functions and add qualified personnel to succeed in these markets. If we are unable to address these challenges, our business could be adversely affected.

Investment in Sales and Marketing. In order to support future sales, we will need to continue to invest significant resources devoted to our sales force and global network of partners and resellers. We have made and plan to continue to make significant investments in expanding our sales teams and distribution programs with our channel partners and increasing our brand awareness. Any investments we make in our sales and marketing will occur in advance of our experiencing any benefits from such investments, and so it may be difficult for us to determine if we are efficiently allocating our resources in this area. We cannot assure that the investments we have made, or intend to make, to strengthen our sales and marketing efforts will result in an increase in revenue or an improvement in our results of operations. We believe that our

investment in sales and marketing will help us grow our revenue and improve our results of operations in the long-term. However, the resulting increase in operating expenses attributable to sales and marketing may impact our profitability in the near-term.

Investment in Product Development. Our performance is significantly dependent on the investments we make in our research and development efforts, and in our ability to continue to innovate, improve functionality, adapt to new technologies or changes to existing technologies. We intend to continue to invest in new solution development and enhancements to our existing solutions. We cannot be assured that we will realize increased revenues from our development initiatives. We believe that our investment in product development will contribute to long-term revenue growth, but it may impact our near-term profitability.

Investment in Infrastructure. In order to support our operations, we have made and expect to continue to make substantial investments in our infrastructure in connection with enhancing and expanding our operations domestically and internationally. For example, we intend to continue to invest in our software systems and additional data center resources to keep pace with the growth in the cloud and cloud-based solutions markets. We also expect to make additional investments in our infrastructure, which will result in increased general and administrative expenses. We believe that our investment in infrastructure will contribute to improvements in our operating results in the long-term; however, it will limit our available capital resources and impact profitability in the near-term.

Renewal Rates. Our solutions include a required subscription to our Barracuda Energize Updates subscription service. Customers also purchase subscriptions to virtual appliance software, cloud services and enhanced support services. The renewal rate of our subscriptions will affect our gross billings and recognized revenue in future periods. Renewal rates from subscriptions, on a dollars basis, have been 96% and 95% for the three and six months ended August 31, 2014, respectively, and 95% and 96% for the three and six months ended August 31, 2013, respectively.

We believe the renewal rate is an important metric to measure long-term value of customer agreements and our ability to retain our customers. We calculate our renewal rate by comparing the actual dollar amount of contracts renewed in a period to the dollar amount of the expiring contracts in that period, less the value of the expiring contracts that are upgraded to a higher model of the same product in lieu of a renewal. Changes in our renewal rates will have an impact on our revenue growth and operating results.

Cross-sell Opportunity. The continued growth of our business partially depends on our ability to sell additional solutions to our existing customers. We define a solution as a distinct product line that we ~~offer, such as Web Filter or Message Archiver.~~offer. As our existing customers’ IT buying needs evolve, or as our customers realize the benefits of the solutions that they previously purchased, our portfolio of solutions provides us an opportunity to cross-sell additional solutions. Customers who successfully deploy more than one type of solution provide substantially more customer lifetime value to us, and can derive greater value from our solutions as they benefit from synergies in management, support and functionality. To support our cross-sell efforts, we intend to continue adding higher touch sales and marketing field resources to liaise with our channel partners as we continue to grow our sales both domestically and internationally. We expect that our continued investment in resources to expand our cross-sell efforts to existing customers will result in longer-term revenue growth opportunities.

We monitor the following key metrics to help us evaluate growth trends, establish budgets and assess operational efficiencies. In addition to our results determined in accordance with GAAP, we believe the following non-GAAP and operational measures are useful in evaluating our operating performance.

The following presents our key metrics and provides reconciliations of the most directly comparable GAAP financial measure to each non-GAAP financial measure (dollars in thousands):


	Three Months Ended May 31,						Three Months Ended August 31,						Six Months Ended August 31,
	2014			2013			2014			2013			2014			2013
Gross billings	$	87,600		$	74,865		$	89,035		$	75,623		$	176,635		$	150,488
Year-over-year percentage increase		17	%					18	%					17	%
Year-over-year percentage increase on a constant currency basis ⁽¹⁾		16	%					17	%					16	%
Adjusted EBITDA	$	19,427		$	12,053		$	19,980		$	11,372		$	39,407		$	23,425
Adjusted EBITDA as a percentage of total revenue		29	%		21	%		29	%		20	%		29	%		21	%
Free cash flow	$	4,203		$	1,607		$	13,679		$	9,416		$	17,882		$	11,023
Free cash flow as a percentage of total revenue		6	%		3	%		20	%		16	%		13	%		10	%
Active subscribers at period end		214,339			184,232			225,600			190,700			225,600			190,700

Gross billings. We define gross billings as total revenue plus the change in deferred revenue and other adjustments which primarily reflect returns and reserves with respect to the 30-day right to return we provide to our customers, as well as rebates for certain channel partner activities, during a particular period. We use gross billings as a performance measurement, based on our business model of invoicing our customers at the time of sale of our solutions and recognizing revenue ratably over subsequent periods. Accordingly, we believe gross billings provide valuable insight into the sales of our solutions and the performance of our business. The gross billings we record in any period reflect sales to new customers plus renewals and additional sales to existing customers adjusted for returns, rebates and other offsets, which we do not expect to be recognized as revenue in future periods. In many cases, these returns, rebates and other offsets occur in periods different from the period of sale, and are unrelated to the marketing efforts leading to the initial sale, and therefore by adjusting for such offsets, we believe our computation of gross billings better reflects the effectiveness of our sales and marketing efforts.

The following table reconciles total revenue to gross billings (dollars in thousands):


							Three Months						Six Months
	Three Months Ended May 31,						Ended August 31,						Ended August 31,
	2014			2013			2014			2013			2014			2013
Total revenue	$	66,209		$	56,277		$	68,652		$	57,790		$	134,861		$	114,067
Total deferred revenue, end of period		328,488			274,444
Total deferred revenue, end of period⁽¹⁾								342,663			286,792			342,663			286,792
Less: total deferred revenue, beginning of period		(313,157	)		(261,243	)		(328,488	)		(274,444	)		(313,157	)		(261,243	)
Add: deferred revenue adjustments		6,060			5,387			6,208			5,485			12,268			10,872

Total change in deferred revenue and adjustments		21,391			18,588			20,383			17,833			41,774			36,421

Gross billings	$	87,600		$	74,865		$	89,035		$	75,623		$	176,635		$	150,488

Year-over-year percentage increase		17	%					18	%					17	%
Year-over-year percentage increase on a constant currency basis⁽¹⁾		16	%
Year-over-year percentage increase on a constant currency basis⁽²⁾								17	%					16	%

In the three and six months ended ~~May~~August 31, 2014, gross billings increased 18% and 17% over the prior year’s comparative ~~period.~~periods, respectively. The increase in gross billings was primarily driven by our continued ability to cross-sell additional solutions to existing customers and ~~the growth in our renewal subscriptions as a result of our high level of customer retention as well as~~ additional lead generation opportunities ~~and~~resulting in associated new customer billings. When evaluating our gross billings from period to period, we also evaluate our gross billings for the two comparable periods using a fixed exchange rate, thereby excluding the effect of currency fluctuations.

Adjusted EBITDA. We define adjusted EBITDA as net income (loss) plus non-cash and non-operating charges, which includes acquisition and other non-recurring charges. Because of our business model, where revenue from gross billings is recognized ratably over subsequent periods, substantially all of our gross billings increase deferred revenue. Therefore, we believe that adjusting net income (loss) for increases in deferred revenue and increases in the associated deferred costs provides another indication of profitability from our operations. We use adjusted EBITDA to measure our performance, prepare our budgets and establish metrics for variable compensation. Because adjusted EBITDA excludes certain non-cash and non-operating charges, this measure enables us to eliminate the impact of items we do not consider indicative of our core operating performance and to better measure our performance on a consistent basis from period to period.

The following table reconciles net income (loss) attributable to Barracuda Networks, Inc. to adjusted EBITDA (dollars in thousands):


							Three Months						Six Months
	Three Months Ended May 31,						Ended August 31,						Ended August 31,
	2014			2013			2014			2013			2014			2013
Net income (loss) attributable to Barracuda Networks, Inc.	$	151		$	(2,404	)	$	738		$	(2,175	)	$	889		$	(4,579	)
Total deferred revenue, end of period		328,488			274,444
Total deferred revenue, end of period⁽¹⁾								342,663			286,792			342,663			286,792
Less: total deferred revenue, beginning of period		(313,157	)		(261,243	)		(328,488	)		(274,444	)		(313,157	)		(261,243	)
Less: total deferred costs, end of period		(52,549	)		(42,556	)		(54,582	)		(46,058	)		(54,582	)		(46,058	)
Total deferred costs, beginning of period		50,279			39,470			52,549			42,556			50,279			39,470
Other expense, net		57			457
Other (income) expense, net								681			(7	)		738			450
Provision (benefit) for income taxes		600			(1,047	)		(292	)		(1,089	)		308			(2,136	)
Depreciation and amortization⁽¹⁾		2,087			2,245
Depreciation and amortization⁽²⁾								2,335			2,489			4,422			4,734
Stock-based compensation		3,082			2,497			3,736			2,631			6,818			5,128
Acquisition and other non-recurring charges⁽²⁾		389			190
Acquisition and other non-recurring charges⁽³⁾								640			677			1,029			867

Adjusted EBITDA	$	19,427		$	12,053		$	19,980		$	11,372		$	39,407		$	23,425

Adjusted EBITDA as a percentage of total revenue		29	%		21	%		29	%		20	%		29	%		21	%

~~(2)~~⁽³⁾

Adjusted EBITDA increased to ~~$19.4~~$20.0 million in the three months ended ~~May~~August 31, 2014 from ~~$12.1~~$11.4 million in the three months ended ~~May~~August 31, 2013. ~~The fluctuations~~Adjusted EBITDA increased to $39.4 million in the six months ended August 31, 2014 from $23.4 million in the six months ended August 31, 2013.The increases in adjusted EBITDA from period to period were ~~based~~ primarily ~~upon changes~~driven by increases in our gross billings and ~~our investments~~decreases in ~~research~~sales and ~~development.~~marketing expense as a percentage of revenue.

Free cash flow. We define free cash flow as cash provided by operating activities, less purchases of property and equipment plus acquisition and other non-recurring charges. We consider free cash flow to be a useful liquidity measure that considers the investment in cloud and corporate infrastructure required to support our business and the impact of acquisition related expenses and other non-recurring charges. We use free cash flow to assess our business performance and evaluate the amount of cash generated by our business after adjusting for purchases of property and equipment and acquisition and other non-recurring charges.

The following table reconciles cash provided by operating activities to free cash flow (dollars in thousands):


	Three Months Ended May 31,						Three Months Ended August 31,						Six Months Ended August 31,
	2014			2013			2014			2013			2014			2013
Net cash provided by operating activities		5,407			194		$	15,475		$	11,889		$	20,882		$	12,083
Less: purchases of property and equipment		(1,589	)		(1,663	)		(2,186	)		(2,866	)		(3,775	)		(4,529	)
Acquisition and other non-recurring charges⁽¹⁾		385			3,076			390			393			775			3,469

Free cash flow	$	4,203		$	1,607		$	13,679		$	9,416		$	17,882		$	11,023

Free cash flow as a percentage of total revenue		6	%		3	%		20	%		16	%		13	%		10	%

Free cash flow increased to ~~$4.2~~$13.7 million in the three months ended ~~May~~August 31, 2014 from ~~$1.6~~$9.4 million in the three months ended ~~May~~August 31, 2013. The increase in free cash flow was driven primarily by a ~~$7.1 million increase in our net operating assets and liabilities primarily due to increased deferred revenue and lower tax payments in the three months ended May 31, 2014 and a $2.7~~$3.1 million change from a net loss in the three months ended ~~May~~August 31, 2013 to a net profit in the three months ended ~~May~~August 31, 2014 primarily due to increased revenue and a decline in sales and marketing expense as a percentage of total revenue in the three months ended ~~May~~August 31, 2014. Free cash flow increased to $17.9 million in the six months ended August 31, 2014 from $11.0 million in the six months ended August 31, 2013. The increase in free cash flow was driven

primarily by a $6.4 million increase in our net operating assets and liabilities in the six months ended August 31, 2014 and a $5.8 million change from a net loss in the six months ended August 31, 2013 to a net profit in the six months ended August 31, 2014 primarily due to increased revenue and a decline in sales and marketing expense as a percentage of total revenue in the six months ended August 31, 2014. The increases in free cash flow for the six months ended August 31, 2014 were partially offset by greater excess tax benefits from equity activity of $4.1 million and a $2.7 million decrease in non-recurring charges mainly associated with the transition of our CEO in the ~~three~~six months ended ~~May~~August 31, 2013.

Active subscribers. We define an active subscriber as a discrete appliance, virtual appliance or cloud-only service that has activated at least one valid subscription that has not been terminated. We monitor the total number of active subscribers as a measure of the growth in our installed base, the success of our sales and marketing activities and the value that our solutions bring to our customers. As of ~~May~~August 31, 2014 and 2013, we had ~~214,339~~225,600 and ~~184,232~~190,700 active subscribers, respectively. The increase in active subscribers over this period is primarily related to our ability to attract and retain new customers.

Our non-GAAP measures have limitations as analytical tools and you should not consider them in isolation or as a substitute for an analysis of our results under GAAP. There are a number of limitations related to the use of these non-GAAP financial measures versus their nearest GAAP equivalents. First, gross billings, adjusted EBITDA and free cash flow are not substitutes for total revenue, net income (loss) and cash provided by operating activities, respectively. Second, other companies may calculate non-GAAP financial measures differently or may use other measures to evaluate their performance, all of which could reduce the usefulness of our non-GAAP financial measures as tools for comparison. Finally, adjusted EBITDA excludes some costs, namely, non-cash stock-based compensation and depreciation and amortization expense, which are recurring. Therefore adjusted EBITDA does not reflect the non-cash impact of stock-based compensation or working capital needs that will continue for the foreseeable future.

In calculating adjusted EBITDA and free cash flow, we also adjust for acquisition and other charges that we do not expect to recur in our continuing operating results. We believe that adjusting for these charges allows us to better compare adjusted EBITDA and free cash flow from period to period in order to assess the ongoing operating results of our business. We refer to costs related to our CEO transition, export compliance and acquisitions as our “acquisition and other non-recurring charges” throughout this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. These costs consist of the following:

CEO transition. Prior to fiscal year 2014, we incurred CEO transition costs including severance payments made to our former chief executive officer and related legal expenses, as well as recruitment and other fees related to the hiring of our current chief executive officer. These costs also included costs and bonuses related to the office of the CEO and bonuses for certain executives paid in connection with the transition. These costs were classified primarily as general and administrative expenses in our condensed consolidated statements of operations. We did not incur such costs in the ~~three~~six months ended ~~May~~August 31, 2014 and 2013. In the ~~three~~six months ended ~~May~~August 31, 2013, free cash flow included certain executive bonuses paid in connection with the transition.

Export compliance. Export compliance costs include legal expenses incurred in connection with an internal investigation of our export controls compliance procedures and the submission of our voluntary self-disclosures to the U.S. government in this regard. These costs are classified as general and administrative expenses in our condensed consolidated statements of operations.

Acquisition costs. Acquisition costs include legal, valuation consulting and other expenses incurred in connection with acquisitions as well as contingent consideration payments made under the terms of certain acquisition agreements. The ~~acquisition-related~~acquisition related legal expenses are classified as general and administrative expenses and the contingent consideration payments are primarily classified as research and development expenses in our condensed consolidated statements of operations.

The following tables present the details of our acquisition and other non-recurring charges and their impact on adjusted EBITDA (in thousands):


	Three Months Ended May 31,				Three Months Ended August 31,				Six Months Ended August 31,
	2014		2013		2014		2013		2014		2013
Export compliance	$	17		—	$	52	$	211	$	69	$	211
Acquisition costs		372		190		588		466		960		656

Total	$	389	$	190	$	640	$	677	$	1,029	$	867

The following tables present the details of our acquisition and other non-recurring charges and their impact on free cash flow (in thousands):


	Three Months Ended May 31,				Three Months Ended August 31,				Six Months Ended August 31,
	2014		2013		2014		2013		2014		2013
CEO transition	$	—	$	1,946	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	1,946
Export compliance		13		940		18		—		31		940
Acquisition costs		372		190		372		393		744		583

Total	$	385	$	3,076	$	390	$	393	$	775	$	3,469

•

Subscription Revenue. Subscription revenue is generated primarily from our subscription services such as our Barracuda Energize Updates as well as our cloud solutions. Subscription revenue also includes revenue from fixed term licenses of our virtual appliance software support and maintenance. Our subscription terms range from one to five years, the substantial majority of which are for one-year periods. We recognize revenue from subscriptions and support and maintenance over the contractual service period.

Cost of revenue consists of costs related to our appliance and subscription revenue. Such costs include hardware, manufacturing, shipping and logistics, customer support, warranty, personnel costs, data center costs and amortization of intangible assets related to acquired technology. We expect our cost of revenue to increase in absolute dollars, although it may fluctuate as a percentage of total revenue from period to period, as we continue to grow.

Gross profit as a percentage of total revenue, or gross margin, has been and will continue to be affected by a variety of factors, including manufacturing costs, cost of technical support and the mix of our solutions sold. We expect our gross profit to fluctuate over time depending on the factors described above.

Our operating expenses consist of research and development, sales and marketing and general and administrative expenses. Personnel costs are the most significant component of operating expenses and consist of salaries, benefits, bonuses, stock-based compensation and travel-related expenses. Operating expenses also include allocated overhead costs for facilities, IT and depreciation. We expect operating expenses to increase in absolute dollars, although they may fluctuate as a percentage of total revenue from period to period, as we continue to grow. In particular, we expect our stock-based compensation expense to increase in absolute dollars as a result of our existing stock-based compensation to be recognized as options and restricted stock units (“RSUs”) vest and as we issue additional stock-based awards to attract and retain employees.

distributors. We capitalize and amortize the direct and incremental portion of our sales commissions over the period the related revenue is recognized. We expect sales and marketing expenses to continue to increase in absolute dollars as we increase the size of our sales and marketing organizations, although our sales and marketing expenses may fluctuate as a percentage of total revenue.

Other income (expense), net consists primarily of foreign exchange gains and losses, interest expense on our outstanding debt and interest income earned on our cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities. We expect interest income will vary each reporting period depending on our average investment balances during the period, types and mix of investments, and market interest rates.

Our ~~provision~~benefit (provision) for income taxes consists primarily of federal and state income taxes in the United States and income taxes in foreign jurisdictions in which we conduct business. We estimate income taxes in each of the jurisdictions in which we operate. This process involves determining income tax expense together with calculating the deferred income tax expense related to temporary differences resulting from the differing treatment of items for tax and accounting purposes. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. These temporary differences result in deferred tax assets and liabilities, which are included within the consolidated balance sheets. Deferred tax assets are recognized for deductible temporary differences, along with net operating loss and credits carryforwards, if it is more likely than not that the tax benefits will be realized.

The following table summarizes our condensed consolidated results of operations for the periods presented and as a percentage of our total revenue for those periods (dollars in thousands):


	Three Months Ended May 31,															Three Months Ended August 31,
	2014			% of Total Revenue			2013			% of Total Revenue			Change			2014			% of Total Revenue			2013			% of Total Revenue			Change
Revenue:
Appliance	$	20,836			31	%	$	17,503			31	%	$	3,333		$	20,676			30	%	$	17,906			31	%	$	2,770
Subscription		45,373			69			38,774			69			6,599			47,976			70			39,884			69			8,092

Total revenue		66,209			100			56,277			100			9,932			68,652			100			57,790			100			10,862
Cost of revenue		14,406			22			13,074			23			1,332			14,044			20			13,407			23			637

Gross profit		51,803			78			43,203			77			8,600			54,608			80			44,383			77			10,225
Operating expenses:
Research and development		12,952			20			10,842			19			2,110			13,826			20			11,638			20			2,188
Sales and marketing		29,479			44			28,836			51			643			31,031			45			28,392			49			2,639
General and administrative		8,564			13			6,678			12			1,886			8,624			13			7,827			14			797

Total operating expenses		50,995			77			46,356			82			4,639			53,481			78			47,857			83			5,624

Income (loss) from operations		808			1			(3,153	)		(5	)		3,961			1,127			2			(3,474	)		(6	)		4,601
Other expense, net		(57	)		—			(457	)		(1	)		400
Other income (expense), net																	(681	)		(1	)		7			—			(688	)

Income (loss) before income taxes and non-controlling interest		751			1			(3,610	)		(6	)		4,361			446			1			(3,467	)		(6	)		3,913
Benefit (provision) for income taxes		(600	)		(1	)		1,047			2			(1,647	)
Benefit for income taxes																	292			—			1,089			2			(797	)

Consolidated net income (loss)		151			—			(2,563	)		(4	)		2,714			738			1			(2,378	)		(4	)		3,116
Net loss attributable to non-controlling interest		—			—			159			—			(159	)		—			—			203			—			(203	)

Net income (loss) attributable to Barracuda Networks, Inc.	$	151			—	%	$	(2,404	)		(4	)%	$	2,555		$	738			1	%	$	(2,175	)		(4	)%	$	2,913

Total revenue increased ~~$9.9~~$10.9 million, or ~~18%~~19%, for the three months ended ~~May~~August 31, 2014 compared to the three months ended ~~May~~August 31, 2013. Subscription revenue increased by ~~$6.6~~$8.1 million, or ~~17%~~20%, primarily due to an increase in active subscribers during the period of ~~30,107,~~34,900, or ~~16%~~18%, from ~~184,232~~190,700 active subscribers as of ~~May~~August 31, 2013 to ~~214,339~~225,600 active subscribers as of ~~May~~August 31, 2014. This increase primarily resulted from our high level of customer retention and an increase in the number of customers purchasing subscriptions from us. Total appliance revenue increased by ~~$3.3~~$2.8 million, or ~~19%~~15%, primarily due to increased demand for our solutions.

Cost of revenue increased for the three months ended ~~May~~August 31, 2014 compared to the three months ended ~~May~~August 31, 2013 commensurate with the increase in appliance and subscription revenue for the comparable periods. Gross margin ~~remained relatively consistent for~~increased in the three months ended ~~May~~August 31, 2014 compared to the three months ended ~~May~~August 31, ~~2013.~~2013 primarily due to certain acquisition related intangible assets becoming fully amortized in prior periods resulting in a $0.5 million decrease in amortization expense and a $0.3 million decrease in warranty costs.

Research and development expense increased ~~$2.1~~$2.2 million, or 19%, for the three months ended ~~May~~August 31, 2014 compared to the three months ended ~~May~~August 31, 2013, primarily due to a ~~$1.9~~$1.5 million increase in compensation and personnel related costs primarily attributable to a ~~16%~~19% increase in research and development headcount, as we continued to invest in our solutions to innovate and improve functionality and increased costs associated with the expansion of our employee benefits ~~programs.~~programs, a $0.3 million increase in stock-based compensation expense and a $0.3 million increase in IT-related infrastructure expense. As a percentage of total revenue, research and development expense remained ~~relatively~~ consistent for the comparable periods.

Sales and marketing expense increased ~~$0.6~~$2.6 million, or 2%9%, for the three months ended ~~May~~August 31, 2014 compared to the three months ended ~~May~~August 31, 2013, primarily due to a ~~$1.3~~$1.4 million increase in compensation and personnel related costs attributable to increased commissions expense from higher gross billings, ~~and~~ increased costs associated with the expansion of our employee benefits programs ~~partially offset by~~and a 12% increase in sales and marketing headcount, a $0.5 million ~~decrease~~increase in marketing ~~expenses.~~expenses and a $0.5 million increase in stock-based compensation expense. As a percentage of total revenue, sales and marketing expense have declined as we aligned marketing spend with salesforce capacity and product initiatives.

General and administrative expense increased ~~$1.9~~$0.8 million, or ~~28%~~10%, for the three months ended ~~May~~August 31, 2014 compared to the three months ended ~~May~~August 31, 2013, primarily due to a ~~$0.7~~$0.9 million increase in compensation and personnel related costs ~~primarily~~ attributable to a ~~17%~~20% increase in general and administrative headcount and a $0.6 million increase in compliance and other costs associated with becoming a public company, ~~and~~partially offset by a ~~$0.2~~$0.5 million ~~increase~~decrease in ~~stock-based compensation.~~bad debt expense. As a percentage of total revenue, general and administrative expense remained relatively consistent for the comparable periods.

The change in other ~~expense,~~income (expense), net was primarily due to a ~~$0.4~~$0.8 million ~~decrease~~increase in foreign exchange losses ~~(mainly~~(primarily related to the ~~Euro~~British Pound and ~~GBP currencies)~~Japanese Yen) during the three months ended ~~May~~August 31, 2014 compared to the three months ended ~~May~~August 31, 2013.

We recorded an income tax ~~provision~~benefit of ~~$0.6~~$0.3 million for the three months ended ~~May~~August 31, 2014. The difference between the income tax benefit (provision) that would be derived by applying the statutory rate to our year-to-date income before tax and the income tax benefit (provision) actually recorded is primarily due to the impact of non-deductible stock-based compensation ~~expenses~~expense and other currently non-deductible items, and various discrete items. For the three months ended ~~May~~August 31, 2013, we recorded an income tax benefit of $1.1 million.

The following table summarizes our condensed consolidated results of operations for the periods presented and as a percentage of our total revenue for those periods (dollars in thousands):

Total revenue increased $20.8 million, or 18%, for the six months ended August 31, 2014 compared to the six months ended August 31, 2013. Subscription revenue increased by $14.7 million, or 19%, primarily due to an increase in active subscribers during the period of 34,900,

or 18%, from 190,700 active subscribers as of August 31, 2013 to 225,600 active subscribers as of August 31, 2014. This increase primarily resulted from our high level of customer retention and an increase in the number of customers purchasing subscriptions from us. Total appliance revenue increased by $6.1 million, or 17%, primarily due to increased demand for our solutions.

Cost of revenue increased for the six months ended August 31, 2014 compared to the six months ended August 31, 2013 commensurate with the increase in appliance and subscription revenue for the comparable periods. Gross margin increased in the six months ended August 31, 2014 compared to the six months ended August 31, 2013 primarily due to certain acquisition related intangible assets becoming fully amortized in prior periods resulting in a $0.8 million decrease in amortization expense and a $0.7 million decrease in warranty costs.

Research and development expense increased $4.3 million, or 19%, for the six months ended August 31, 2014 compared to the six months ended August 31, 2013, primarily due to a $3.5 million increase in compensation and personnel related costs primarily attributable to a 19% increase in research and development headcount, as we continued to invest in our solutions to innovate and improve functionality and increased costs associated with the expansion of our employee benefits programs, a $0.4 million increase in stock-based compensation expense and a $0.4 million increase in IT-related infrastructure expense. As a percentage of total revenue, research and development expense remained consistent for the comparable periods.

Sales and marketing expense increased $3.3 million, or 6%, for the six months ended August 31, 2014 compared to the six months ended August 31, 2013, primarily due to a $2.7 million increase in compensation and personnel related costs attributable to increased commissions expense from higher gross billings and increased costs associated with the expansion of our employee benefits programs and a $0.7 million increase in stock-based compensation expense, partially offset by a $0.2 million decrease in amortization expense due to certain acquisition related intangible assets became fully amortized in prior periods. As a percentage of total revenue, sales and marketing expense have declined as we aligned marketing spend with salesforce capacity and product initiatives.

General and administrative expense increased $2.7 million, or 18%, for the six months ended August 31, 2014 compared to the six months ended August 31, 2013, primarily due to a $1.6 million increase in compensation and personnel related costs attributable to a 20% increase in general and administrative headcount, a $1.0 million increase in compliance and other costs associated with becoming a public company and a $0.6 million increase in stock-based compensation expense, partially offset by a $0.5 million decrease in bad debt expense. As a percentage of total revenue, general and administrative expense remained consistent for the comparable periods.

The change in other expense, net was primarily due to a $0.5 million increase in foreign exchange losses (primarily related to the British Pound and Japanese Yen) during the six months ended August 31, 2014 compared to the six months ended August 31, 2013.

We recorded an income tax provision of $0.3 million for the six months ended August 31, 2014. The difference between the income tax benefit (provision) that would be derived by applying the statutory rate to our year-to-date income before tax and the income tax benefit (provision) actually recorded is primarily due to the impact of non-deductible stock-based compensation expense and other currently non-deductible items, and various discrete items. For the six months ended August 31, 2013, we recorded an income tax benefit of $2.1 million.


	Three Months Ended May 31,						Six Months Ended August 31,
	2014			2013			2014			2013
	(in thousands)						(in thousands)
Cash provided by operating activities	$	5,407		$	194		$	20,882		$	12,083
Cash used in investing activities		(2,189	)		(7,839	)	$	(9,166	)	$	(13,342	)
Cash provided by (used in) financing activities		2,464			(1,814	)
Cash provided by financing activities							$	9,056		$	195

As of ~~May~~August 31, 2014, we had cash and cash equivalents of ~~$141.6~~$156.6 million, of which ~~$5.2~~$8.7 million was held outside of the United States and not presently available to fund domestic operations and obligations. If we were to repatriate cash held outside of the United States, it could be subject to U.S. income taxes, less any previously paid foreign income taxes.

We believe that our existing cash and cash equivalents, together with our existing credit facility of $25.0 million, will be sufficient to meet our anticipated cash needs for at least the next 12 months. Our future capital requirements will depend on many factors including our growth rate, the timing and extent of spending to support development efforts, the expansion of sales and marketing activities, the introduction

of new and enhanced solutions and service offerings, and the continuing market acceptance of our solutions. In the event that additional financing is required from outside sources, we may not be able to raise it on terms acceptable to us or at all. If we are unable to raise additional capital when desired, our business, operating results and financial condition would be adversely affected.

Our primary source of cash from operating activities has been from cash collections from our customers. We expect cash inflows from operating activities to be affected by increases in sales and timing of collections. Our primary uses of cash from operating activities have been for personnel costs and investment in sales and marketing and research and development infrastructure. We expect cash outflows from operating activities to be affected by increases in sales and increases in personnel costs as we grow our business.

For the ~~three~~six months ended ~~May~~August 31, 2014, operating activities provided ~~$5.4~~$20.9 million in cash primarily due to a positive change of ~~$5.1~~$19.3 million in our net operating assets and ~~liabilities.~~liabilities, consolidated net income of $0.9 million and non-cash charges of $0.7 million.

For the ~~three~~six months ended ~~May~~August 31, 2013, operating activities provided ~~$0.2~~$12.1 million in cash primarily due to ~~non-cash charges of $4.8 million, while partially offset by our net loss of $2.6 million and~~ a ~~negative~~positive change of ~~$2.0~~$12.8 million in our net operating assets and ~~liabilities.~~liabilities and non-cash charges of $4.2 million, partially offset by our consolidated net loss of $4.9 million.

Our investing activities have consisted primarily of purchases of property and equipment related to providing cloud subscriptions, purchases and sales of short-term marketable securities, and activity in connection with prior acquisitions. We expect to continue to make purchases of property and equipment to support continued growth of our business.

Cash used in investing activities of ~~$2.2~~$9.2 million in the ~~three~~six months ended ~~May~~August 31, 2014 was primarily related to our acquisition of C2C and acquisition related escrow payments of $4.8 million, purchases of property and equipment of ~~$1.6~~$3.8 million and investments of $0.6 million in non-marketable equity and debt securities.

Cash used in investing activities of ~~$7.8~~$13.3 million in the ~~three~~six months ended ~~May~~August 31, 2013 was primarily related to our acquisition of SignNow, Inc. ~~in April 2013 resulting in a use of $6.2~~and acquisition related contingent consideration payments totaling $8.5 million as well as purchases of property and equipment of ~~$1.7~~$4.5 million.

We believe future capital expenditures are likely to be consistent with historical experience with variations above or below the range depending upon our need to make additional investments for facilities expansion.

Our financing activities primarily consisted of proceeds from the exercises of stock options, repurchases of common stock and payment of dividends declared on our common stock and redeemable convertible preferred stock.

For the ~~three~~six months ended ~~May~~August 31, 2014, financing activities provided ~~$2.5~~$9.1 million in cash primarily from various equity related transactions, including proceeds from stock option exercises of ~~$2.3~~$7.2 million and excess tax benefits from equity ~~incentive plans~~activity of ~~$1.8~~$4.3 million. These cash inflows were partially offset by tax payments related to ~~$1.1~~$2.3 million of net share settlements of equity awards.

For the ~~three~~six months ended ~~May~~August 31, 2013, financing activities ~~used $1.8~~provided $0.2 million of ~~cash primarily for the payment of dividends of $1.4 million.~~cash.

There have been no ~~significant~~material changes tooutside the ordinary course of our business in the contractual obligations disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended February 28, ~~2014.~~2014, except in connection with our acquisition of C2C, we agreed to contingent consideration payments up to $4.9 million upon the attainment of certain billings levels and performance integration targets through August 2017. At the acquisition date, we estimated fair value for contingent consideration to be $2.9 million.

As of ~~May~~August 31, 2014, we did not have any relationships with unconsolidated organizations or financial partnerships, such as structured finance or special purpose entities that would have been established for the purpose of facilitating off-balance sheet arrangements or other contractually narrow or limited purposes.

Our consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with GAAP. The preparation of these consolidated financial statements requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenue, expenses and related disclosures. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that we believe are reasonable under the circumstances. We evaluate our estimates and assumptions on an ongoing basis. Actual results may differ from these estimates. To the extent that there are material differences between these estimates and our actual results, our future financial statements will be affected.

There have been no significant changes to our critical accounting policies and estimates as disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended February 28, 2014.

We are an “emerging growth company,” as defined in the Jumpstart Our Business Startup Act of 2012 (the “JOBS Act”). Under the JOBS Act, emerging growth companies can delay adopting new or revised accounting standards issued subsequent to the enactment of the JOBS Act until such time as those standards apply to private companies. We have irrevocably elected not to avail ourselves of this exemption from new or revised accounting standards, and, therefore, will be subject to the same new or revised accounting standards as other public companies that are not emerging growth companies.

Refer to “Recent Accounting Pronouncements” in Note 1 to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part I, Item 1 of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

A portion of our revenue and operating expenses are incurred outside the United States and are denominated in foreign currencies, which are subject to foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations, particularly changes in the euro. Our reported revenues and operating results may be impacted by fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates. Fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates may also cause us to recognize transaction gains and losses in our statement of operations. To date, foreign currency transaction gains and losses have not been material to our financial statements, and we have not engaged in any foreign currency hedging transactions.

We had cash and cash equivalents of ~~$141.6~~$156.6 million and $135.9 million as of ~~May~~August 31, 2014 and February 28, 2014, respectively. We hold our cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities for working capital purposes. Our cash and cash equivalents are primarily held in cash deposits and money market funds, and we did not have any marketable securities as of ~~May~~August 31, 2014 and February 28, ~~2014.~~2014, respectively. Due to the short-term nature of these instruments, we believe that we do not have any material exposure to changes in the fair value of our investment portfolio as a result of changes in interest rates. Declines in interest rates, however, would reduce future interest income. The effect of a hypothetical 10% increase or decrease in overall interest rates would not have had a material impact on the fair value of our investment portfolio as of ~~May~~August 31, 2014 and February 28, 2014, respectively, or our interest income for the three and six months ended ~~May~~August 31, 2014 and ~~2013.~~2013, respectively.

Our management, with the participation of our chief executive officer (“CEO”) and chief financial officer (“CFO”), has evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), as of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. Based upon the controls evaluation, our CEO and CFO have concluded that as of such date, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed in our Exchange Act reports is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified by the SEC and to ensure that material information relating to us and our consolidated subsidiaries is made known to management, including our CEO and CFO.

Disclosure controls and procedures are designed to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act, such as this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed such that information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our CEO and CFO, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the three months ended ~~May~~August 31, 2014 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act). Internal control over financial reporting means a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with GAAP.

Our management, including our CEO and CFO, does not expect that our disclosure controls and procedures or our internal controls over financial reporting will prevent or detect all error and all fraud. A control system, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within the Company have been detected. These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty, and that breakdowns can occur because of a simple error or mistake. Additionally, controls can be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people, or by management override of the controls. The design of any system of controls also is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions. Over time, controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. Because of the inherent limitations in a cost-effective control system, misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected.

In late 2011, following a voluntary internal review of our compliance with U.S. export control and sanctions laws, our management team became aware that certain of our physical appliances had been sold indirectly into embargoed countries via our distributors and resellers, potentially in violation of U.S. export control and economic sanctions laws. In addition, certain of our solutions incorporate encryption components and may be exported from the U.S. only with the required approvals; in the past, we may have exported products prior to receiving these required authorizations. We believe that these potential violations were inadvertent and occurred because we and certain of our resellers did not have sufficient compliance procedures in place to prevent the transactions at issue. As a result, we were unable to preclude certain of our channel partners and resellers from selling our solutions into countries subject to a U.S. embargo until late 2011. After completion of a comprehensive internal investigation conducted by outside counsel, we submitted voluntary disclosures regarding these matters to BIS and to OFAC. These disclosures summarized potential violations of export controls and economic sanctions laws, including reexports by third parties and provision of services to end users in embargoed countries including Iran, Sudan and Syria.

The ~~reviews~~review of our voluntary disclosures by ~~BIS and~~ OFAC ~~are~~is still in process.

The Company received a Proposed Charging Letter from BIS on August 21, 2014 (“Letter”), which asserts certain export violations against the Company and ~~OFAC may conclude~~its UK subsidiary. Based on discussions with BIS, the Company currently expects a one-time monetary penalty is to be imposed, and does not expect any criminal charges, denial of export privileges, or ongoing monitoring actions. As requested by BIS in the Letter, the Company has contacted BIS within thirty days of the date of the letter to indicate that ~~our actions resulted~~supplemental information will be provided by the Company. The Company intends to continue cooperating with BIS in ~~violations of U.S. export control and economic sanctions laws and warrant~~an effort to resolve this matter. However, given the ~~imposition of penalties that could include fines, termination~~early stage of our ~~ability~~discussions, the Company is unable at this time to ~~export our products, and/~~estimate the timing or ~~referral for criminal prosecution.~~ amount of any final resolution.

Any such penalties may be material to our financial results in the period in which they are imposed and could significantly affect our quarterly operating results for that quarter. The penalties may be imposed against us and/or our management. Also, disclosure of our conduct and any fines or other action relating to this conduct could harm our reputation and indirectly have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results and financial condition.

On August 13, 2013, Parallel Networks, LLC (“Parallel Networks”) which we believe is a non-practicing entity, filed a lawsuit against us in the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware,Parallel Networks, LLC v. Barracuda Networks, Inc., Case No. 1:13-cv-01412-UNA, alleging that certain of our appliances infringe two of their U.S. patents: Pat. No. 7,571,217, titled “Method and System for Uniform Resource Locator Transformation,” and Pat. No. 8,352,570, titled “Method and System for Uniform Resource Locator Transformation.” Parallel Networks has asserted similar claims against other companies. This matter is in its early stages, but we intend to vigorously defend the lawsuit.

On April 23, 2014, Selene Communication Technologies, LLC (“Selene”) filed a lawsuit against us in the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware,Selene Communication Technologies, LLC v. Barracuda Networks, Inc., Case No. 1:99-mc-09999, alleging that certain of our appliances infringe U.S. patent number 7,143,444, titled “Application-Layer Anomaly and Misuse Detection.” ~~Selene has asserted similar claims against other companies. This matter~~Dismissal of the lawsuit with prejudice is ~~in its early stages, but we intend~~pending. The Company did not incur any loss related to ~~vigorously defend the lawsuit.~~this matter.

We may, from time to time, be party to litigation and subject to claims that arise in the ordinary course of business. In addition, third parties may, from time to time, assert claims against us in the form of letters and other communications. We currently believe that these ordinary course matters will not have a material adverse effect on our business; however, the results of litigation and claims are inherently unpredictable. Regardless of the outcome, litigation can have an adverse impact on us because of defense and settlement costs, diversion of management resources and other factors.

Our operations and financial results are subject to various risks and uncertainties, including those described below. The risks and uncertainties described below are not the only ones we face. Additional risks and uncertainties that we are unaware of, or that we currently believe are not material, may also become important factors that affect us. If any of the following risks occur, our business, financial condition, operating results and prospects could be materially and adversely affected. In that event, the price of our common stock could decline.

If we are unable to increase sales of our solutions to new customers and sell additional distinct solutions from our portfolio of solutions to our existing customers, our future revenue and operating results will be harmed.

Our future success depends on our ability to increase sales of our solutions to new customers as well as to increase sales of additional solutions to our existing customers. The rate at which new and existing customers purchase solutions depends on a number of factors, including those outside of our control, such as customers’ perceived need for security and storage solutions and general economic conditions. If our efforts to sell our solutions to new customers and additional solutions to our existing customers are not successful, our business and operating results may suffer.

Furthermore, customers that purchase our subscriptions have no contractual obligation to renew their contracts after the initial contract period, which typically ranges from one to five years, and we may not maintain our historical subscription renewal rates. The substantial majority of our subscriptions are for one-year periods. If renewal subscriptions decline, our revenue or revenue growth may decline and our business may suffer.

A substantial majority of our billings in any particular period are derived from sales to customers with whom we began to engage during that same period and therefore our sales may be variable and difficult to predict. Given this unpredictability, we may be unable to accurately forecast our sales in any given period. A failure to accurately predict the level of demand for our solutions may adversely impact our future revenue and operating results, and we are unlikely to forecast such effects with any certainty in advance.

We rely significantly on revenue from subscriptions, which may decline, and, because we recognize revenue from subscriptions over the term of the relevant subscription period, downturns or upturns in sales are not immediately reflected in full in our operating results.

Our subscription revenue accounted for 69% of our total revenue for the ~~three~~six months ended ~~May~~August 31, 2014. Customers that purchase our subscriptions have no contractual obligation to renew their contracts after the initial contract period, which typically ranges from one to five years, and we may not maintain our historical subscription renewal rates. The substantial majority of our subscriptions are for one-year periods. New or renewal subscriptions may decline or fluctuate as a result of a number of factors, including our customers’ level of satisfaction with our solutions and our customer support, the frequency and severity of subscription outages, our solution functionality and performance, the timeliness and success of product enhancements and introductions by us and those of our competitors, the prices of our solutions, the prices of solutions offered by our competitors or reductions in our customers’ spending levels. If new or renewal subscriptions decline, our revenue or revenue growth may decline, and our business may suffer. In addition, we recognize subscription revenue ratably over the term of the relevant subscription period, which typically ranges from one to five years. As a result, much of the revenue we report each quarter is the recognition of billings from subscriptions entered into during previous quarters. Consequently, a decline in new or renewal subscriptions in any one quarter will not be fully reflected in revenue in that quarter, but will negatively affect our revenue in future quarters. Accordingly, the effect of significant downturns in new or renewed sales of our solutions would not be reflected in full in our results of operations until future periods.

We have experienced net losses on a GAAP basis in recent periods and may not achieve or maintain profitability in the future. If we cannot achieve or maintain profitability, our financial performance will be harmed.

We have not been profitable on a quarterly or annual basis in recent periods and while we have generated net income on a U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) basis for the three and six months ended ~~May~~August 31, 2014, we experienced net losses on a GAAP basis for fiscal 2014. While we have experienced revenue growth over these same periods, we may not be able to sustain or increase our growth or achieve profitability in the future or on a consistent basis. Over the past year, we have spent substantial amounts of time and money to develop new security and storage solutions and enhanced versions of our existing security and storage solutions to position us for future growth. Additionally, we have incurred substantial expenses and expended significant resources upfront to market, promote and sell our solutions. We also expect to continue to invest for future growth. In addition, as a public company, we have incurred and expect to continue to incur, significant accounting, legal and other expenses that we did not incur as a private company.

As a result of our increased expenditures, we will have to generate and sustain increased revenue to achieve future profitability. Achieving profitability will require us to increase revenues, manage our cost structure and avoid significant liabilities. Revenue growth may slow, revenue may decline, or we may incur significant losses in the future for a number of possible reasons, including general macroeconomic conditions, increasing competition, a decrease in the growth of the markets in which we operate, or if we fail for any reason to continue to capitalize on growth opportunities. Additionally, we may encounter unforeseen operating expenses, difficulties, complications, delays and other unknown factors that may result in losses in future periods. If these losses exceed our expectations or our revenue growth expectations are not met in future periods, our financial performance will be harmed and our stock price could be volatile or decline.

If we cannot successfully execute on our strategy and continue to develop, manufacture and market solutions that respond promptly to the security and storage needs of our customers’ needs, our business and operating results may suffer.

The security and storage markets are characterized by constant change and innovation, and we expect them to continue to evolve rapidly. Moreover, many of our customers operate in markets characterized by rapidly changing technologies and business models, which require them to develop and manage increasingly complex enterprise networks, incorporating a variety of hardware, software applications, operating systems and networking protocols. Our historical success has been based on our ability to identify common customer needs and design solutions to address complex IT problems in email security and web security, and more recently in backup. Furthermore, our sales and marketing initiatives are primarily focused on higher-growth segments within the security and storage markets, such as next generation firewall appliances and purpose-built backup appliances. Although the mix of solutions sold can vary from period to period, in recent periods we have experienced stronger growth in sales of storage and application security solutions. To the extent we are not able to continue to identify IT challenges and execute our business model to timely and effectively design and market solutions to address these challenges, as well as to continue to expand our sales to higher-growth segments within the security and storage markets, our business, operating results and financial condition will be adversely affected.

Although the market expects rapid introduction of new solutions or enhancements to respond to new threats and address evolving customer needs, the development of these solutions is difficult, and the timetable for commercial release and availability is uncertain as there are periods of delay between releases and the availability of new solutions. We may experience delays in the development and availability of new solutions and fail to timely meet customer needs. If we do not respond to the rapidly changing and rigorous needs of our customers by developing and making available on a timely basis new solutions or enhancements that can respond adequately to new security threats and address evolving customer needs, particularly in the higher-growth segments within the security and storage markets, our competitive position and business prospects will be harmed.

Additionally, the process of developing new technology is complex and uncertain, and if we fail to accurately predict customers’ changing needs and emerging technological trends or if we fail to achieve the benefits expected from our investments, our business could be harmed. We believe that we must continue to dedicate a significant amount of resources to our research and development efforts to maintain our competitive position and we must commit significant resources to developing new solutions before knowing whether our investments will result in solutions the market will accept. Our new solutions or solution enhancements could fail to attain sufficient market acceptance for many reasons, including:

There can be no assurance that we will successfully identify new opportunities, develop and bring new solutions to market on a timely basis or achieve market acceptance of our solutions, or that solutions and technologies developed by others will not render our solutions or technologies obsolete or noncompetitive, all of which could adversely affect our business and operating results. If our new solutions or enhancements do not achieve adequate acceptance in the market, or if our new solutions do not result in increased subscriptions, our competitive position will be impaired, our revenue will be diminished and the negative impact on our operating results may be particularly acute because of the upfront research, development, marketing, sales and other expenses we incurred in connection with the new solution or enhancement.

We have recently introduced, and will continue to introduce, new security and storage solutions and we may not gain broad market acceptance for these new solutions.

Over the past year, we have released several new security and storage solutions and enhanced versions of our existing security and storage solutions, which address the higher-growth segments of the security and storage markets, to incorporate additional features, improve functionality or deliver other enhancements in order to meet our customers’ rapidly evolving demands. The return on our investments in these development efforts may be lower, or may develop more slowly, than we expect. Further, given their recent introduction, we cannot assure you that these solutions will gain broad market acceptance and that they will prove to be profitable in the longer term. Additionally, we intend to continue introducing new security and storage solutions to respond to the needs of our customers. If we fail to achieve high levels of market acceptance for these solutions or if market acceptance is delayed, or if the market segments we address with our new solutions do not grow as expected, we may fail to justify the amount of our investment in developing and bringing them to market, and our business, operating results and financial performance could be adversely affected.

Our business is substantially dependent on sales leads from Internet search engines and if we are unable to generate significant volumes of such leads, traffic to our websites and our revenue may decrease.

We generate a substantial portion of our sales leads through visits to our websites by potential customers interested in our solutions. Many of these potential customers find our websites by searching for security and storage

solutions through Internet search engines, particularly Google. A critical factor in attracting potential customers to our websites is how prominently our websites are displayed in response to search inquiries. If we are listed less prominently or fail to appear in search result listings for any reason, visits to our websites by customers and potential customers could decline significantly and we may not be able to replace this traffic. Furthermore, if the costs of search engine marketing services, such as Google AdWords, increase we may be required to increase our sales and marketing expenses, which may not be offset by additional revenue, and our business and operating results could be adversely affected.

Our quarterly and annual operating results and key metrics have varied in the past and may continue to vary and be unpredictable, which may cause our stock price to fluctuate.

Our quarterly and annual operating results and key metrics have varied from period to period in the past, and we expect that they may continue to fluctuate as a result of a number of factors, many of which are outside of our control, including:

Any one of the factors above, or the cumulative effect of some of the factors referred to above, may result in significant fluctuations in our quarterly or annual operating results, including fluctuations in our key financial metrics. This variability and unpredictability could result in our failing to meet our revenue, billings or operating results expectations or those of securities analysts or investors for any period. In addition, a significant percentage of our operating expenses are fixed in nature and based on forecasted revenue trends. Accordingly, in the event of revenue shortfalls, we are generally unable to mitigate the negative impact on operating results in the short term. If we fail to meet or exceed such expectations for these or any other reasons, our business and stock price could be materially adversely affected and we could face costly lawsuits, including securities class action suits.

We believe that our brand is integral to our success and if we fail to cost-effectively promote or protect our brand, our business and competitive position may be harmed.

We believe that cost-effectively promoting and maintaining awareness and integrity of our company and our brand are vital to achieving widespread acceptance of our existing and future solutions and are important elements in attracting new customers and retaining our existing customers, particularly as we seek to expand internationally. We believe that the importance of brand recognition will increase as competition in our market further intensifies. We have invested and expect to continue to invest substantial resources to promote and maintain our brand and generate sales leads, both domestically and internationally, but there is no guarantee that our brand development strategies will enhance the recognition of our brand or lead to increased sales. For example, we use signs and billboards in key locations such as airports where target customers often travel and vehicles wrapped in highly-visible branding. We also engage in activities such as promotional events and attending trade shows. Some of our existing and potential competitors have well-established brands with equal or greater recognition than we have. If our efforts to cost-effectively promote and maintain our brand are not successful, our operating results and our ability to attract and retain customers may be adversely affected. In addition, even if our brand recognition and loyalty increases, this may not result in increased use of our solutions or higher revenue. Moreover, if we fail to generate a sufficient volume of leads from these various activities, they may not be offset by revenues and our business and operating results could be adversely affected.

In addition, independent industry analysts often provide reviews of our solutions, as well as those of our competitors, and perception of our solutions in the marketplace may be significantly influenced by these reviews. We have no control over what these industry analysts report, and because industry analysts may influence current and potential customers, our brand could be harmed if they do not provide a positive review of our solutions or view us as a market leader.

We face intense competition in the security and storage markets and other markets in which we compete, which are characterized by constant change and innovation, and we may lack sufficient financial or other resources to maintain or improve our competitive position.

The markets for security and storage solutions are intensely competitive and are characterized by constant change and innovation, and we expect competition to increase in the future from larger, well-established competitors and new market entrants. Changes in the application, threat and technology landscape result in evolving customer requirements. Our main competitors in these markets fall into two categories:

In addition, we compete with companies that offer point solutions that compete with some of the features present in our platform. As our market grows, we believe it will attract more highly specialized vendors as well as larger vendors that may continue to acquire or bundle their solutions more effectively.

Many of our existing competitors have, and some of our potential competitors could have, substantial competitive advantages such as:

In addition, our larger competitors have substantially broader solution offerings and leverage their relationships based on other solutions or incorporate functionality into existing solutions to gain business in a manner that discourages customers and potential customers from purchasing our solutions, including through selling at low or negative margins, product bundling or closed technology platforms. Potential customers may also prefer to purchase from their existing suppliers rather than a new supplier regardless of solution performance, price or features. These larger competitors often have broader product lines and market focus and will therefore not be as susceptible to downturns in our markets, thereby reducing their overall risk profile as compared to ours. Many of our smaller competitors that specialize in providing protection from a single type of network security threat are often able to deliver these specialized network security solutions to the market more quickly than we can, which could reduce the addressable market for our new solutions or enhancements to existing solutions. Conditions in our market could change rapidly and significantly as a result of technological advancements, partnering by our competitors or continuing market consolidation. New start-up companies that innovate and large competitors that are making significant investments in research and development may invent similar or superior solutions and technologies that compete with our solutions and technology. Our current and potential competitors may also establish cooperative relationships among themselves or with third parties that may further enhance their ability to compete.

Some of our competitors have made acquisitions of businesses that may allow them to offer more directly competitive and comprehensive solutions than they had previously offered, such as Intel’s acquisition of McAfee. As a result of such acquisitions, our current or potential competitors might be able to adapt more quickly to new technologies and customer needs, devote greater resources to the promotion or sale of their solutions and services, initiate or withstand substantial price competition, take advantage of acquisition or other opportunities more readily, or develop and expand their solution offerings more quickly than we do.

Organizations may be more willing to incrementally add solutions to their existing IT infrastructure from competitors than to replace it with our solutions. These competitive pressures in our market or our failure to compete effectively may result in price reductions, fewer orders, reduced revenue and gross profits and loss of market share. Any failure to meet and address these factors could seriously harm our business and operating results.

Our business is dependent on overall demand for security and storage solutions and therefore reduced security and storage solution spending or overall adverse economic conditions may negatively impact our business and operating results.

Our business depends on the overall demand for security and storage solutions. In addition, the purchase of our solutions is often discretionary. Weak global economic conditions, or a reduction in security and storage solution spending even if economic conditions improve, could adversely impact our business, financial condition and operating results in a number of ways, including longer sales cycles, lower prices for our solutions, higher default rates among our customers and channel partners, reduced subscription renewals and lower our sales levels. Market and financial uncertainty and instability in the United States and Europe could intensify or spread further, particularly if ongoing stabilization efforts prove insufficient. Deterioration of economic conditions, as well as economic uncertainty in the United States and Europe, may harm our business and operating results in the future.

We have made significant investments in recent periods to support our growth, including investments in our information technology, infrastructure and management team, and these investments may achieve delayed or lower than expected benefits, which could harm our operating results. Furthermore, if we do not effectively manage any future growth, or are unable to improve our systems and processes, our operating results will be adversely affected.

We continue to increase the breadth and scope of our offerings and, correspondingly, the breadth and scope of our operations. To support this growth, and to manage any future growth effectively, we must continue to improve and expand our information technology and financial

infrastructure, our operating and administrative systems and our ability to manage headcount, capital and processes in an efficient manner. We have incurred, and will continue to incur, expenses as we invest in international operations and infrastructure such as the expansion of our sales and marketing presence in Asia-Pacific, the addition of higher touch sales and marketing field resources to liaise with our channel partners as we continue to grow our sales both domestically and internationally and investments in software systems and additional data center resources to keep pace with the growth in the cloud and cloud-based solutions markets. In fiscal 2013, we made significant incremental investments in product development, corporate infrastructure and broadened distribution, including hiring a new chief executive officer and a number of other key executives across our organization, and we intend to continue to invest in development of our solutions, our infrastructure and sales and marketing. We have recognized, and are likely to continue to recognize, the costs associated with these investments earlier than some of the anticipated benefits, and the return on these investments may be lower, or may develop more slowly, than we expect. If we do not achieve the benefits anticipated from these investments, or if the achievement of these benefits is delayed, our operating results may be adversely affected.

We may be subject to fines or other penalties for ~~potential~~ past violations of U.S. export control and economic sanctions laws.

In late 2011, following a voluntary internal review of our compliance with U.S. export control and sanctions laws, our management team became aware that certain of our physical appliances had been sold indirectly into embargoed countries via our distributors and resellers, potentially in violation of U.S. export control and economic sanctions laws. These laws restrict or prohibit the sale of certain products, including our solutions, into certain countries, including Iran, Sudan and Syria. In addition, certain of our solutions incorporate encryption components and may be exported from the U.S. only with the required approvals; in the past, we may have exported products prior to receiving these required authorizations. We believe that these ~~potential~~ violations were inadvertent and occurred because we and certain of our resellers did not have sufficient compliance procedures in place to prevent the transactions at issue. As a result, we were unable to preclude certain of our channel partners and resellers from selling our solutions into countries subject to a U.S. embargo until late 2011.

Commencing in late 2011, we took a series of corrective actions intended to remediate the effect of any unauthorized past actions, including actions to permanently disable appliances located in sanctioned countries and termination of certain distributors and resellers. In addition, we believe that we have implemented systematic and process changes to our sales and distribution processes to block and prohibit sale or use of our solutions in sanctioned countries or to denied parties.

After completion of a comprehensive internal investigation conducted by outside counsel, we submitted voluntary disclosures regarding these matters to BIS and to OFAC. These disclosures summarized potential violations of export controls and economic sanctions laws, including reexports by third parties and provision of services to end users in embargoed countries including Iran, Sudan and Syria. The voluntary disclosures also summarized the remedial actions we have taken, including those described above, as well as the hiring of an export compliance manager and a general counsel with export controls experience, and the enhancement of employee training programs, periodic notices to our resellers and company-wide policies and procedures designed to help us comply with these laws.

The reviews of our voluntary disclosures by BIS and OFAC are still in process. BIS has identified and communicated to the Company a list of proposed violations, and OFAC may also conclude that our actions resulted in violations of U.S. export control and economic sanctions ~~laws~~laws. BIS and ~~warrant the imposition of~~OFAC may impose penalties that could include fines, termination of our ability to export our products and/or referral for criminal prosecution. Any such penalties may be material to our financial results in the period in which they are imposed and could significantly affect our quarterly operating results for that quarter. The penalties may be imposed against us and/or our management. Also, disclosure of our conduct and any fines or other action relating to this conduct could harm our reputation and indirectly have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results and financial condition. ~~We cannot make any determinations regarding the imposition of possible penalties.~~ We also cannot assure you that additional violations will not be discovered or that our policies and procedures will be effective to prevent future violations.

Failure to comply with governmental laws and regulations could harm our business.

Our business is subject to regulation by various federal, state, local and foreign governmental agencies, including agencies responsible for monitoring and enforcing employment and labor laws, workplace safety, product safety, environmental laws, consumer protection laws, anti-bribery laws, import/export controls, federal securities laws and tax laws and regulations. In certain foreign jurisdictions, these regulatory requirements may be more stringent than those in the United States. Noncompliance with applicable regulations or requirements could subject us to investigations, sanctions, mandatory product recalls, enforcement actions, disgorgement of profits, fines, damages, civil and criminal penalties or injunctions. If any governmental sanctions are imposed, or if we do not prevail in any possible civil or criminal litigation, our business, operating results, and financial condition could be materially adversely affected. In addition, responding to any action will likely result in a significant diversion of management’s attention and resources and an increase in professional fees. Enforcement actions and sanctions could harm our business, operating results and financial condition.

We generate a significant amount of revenue from sales outside of North America, and we are therefore subject to a number of risks associated with international sales and operations.

Sales outside of North America represented 27% of our total revenue for the ~~three~~six months ended ~~May~~August 31, 2014. As a result, we must continue to hire and train experienced personnel to staff and manage our foreign operations. To the extent that we experience difficulties in recruiting, training, managing and retaining an international staff, and specifically staff related to sales management and sales personnel, we may experience difficulties in sales productivity in foreign markets. If we are not able to maintain successful channel partner and distributor relationships internationally or recruit additional companies to enter into strategic channel partner and distributor relationships, our future success in these international markets could be limited.

Additionally, our international sales and operations are subject to a number of risks, including the following:

In addition, the expansion of our existing international operations and entry into additional international markets have required and will continue to require significant management attention and financial resources. These factors and other factors could harm our ability to gain future international revenues and, consequently, materially impact our business, operating results and financial condition.

We may acquire other businesses which could require significant management attention, disrupt our business, dilute stockholder value and adversely affect our operating results.

As part of our business strategy, we have in the past made, and may in the future make, acquisitions or investments in complementary companies, solutions and technologies that we believe fit within our business model and can address the needs of IT professionals. With respect to our previous acquisitions, we cannot ensure that we will be able to successfully integrate the technology and resources to increase subscriptions and grow revenue derived from these acquisitions. In the future, we may not be able to acquire and integrate other companies, solutions or technologies in a successful manner. We may not be able to find suitable acquisition candidates, and we

may not be able to complete such acquisitions on favorable terms, if at all. Furthermore, we may not be able to find suitable acquisition candidates that enhance our subscription offerings. If we do complete acquisitions, we may not ultimately strengthen our competitive position or achieve our goals, including increases in subscriptions, and any acquisitions we complete could be viewed negatively by our customers, investors and industry analysts.

Future acquisitions may reduce our cash available for operations and other uses and could result in an increase in amortization expense related to identifiable assets acquired. We may have to pay cash, incur debt or issue equity securities to pay for any such acquisition, each of which could adversely affect our financial condition or the value of our common stock. The sale of equity or issuance of debt to finance any such acquisitions could result in dilution to our stockholders. The incurrence of indebtedness would result in increased fixed obligations and could also include covenants or other restrictions that would impede our ability to manage our operations. In addition, our future operating results may be impacted by performance earnouts or contingent bonuses. Furthermore, acquisitions may require large one-time charges and can result in increased debt or contingent liabilities, adverse tax consequences, additional stock-based compensation expense and the recording and subsequent amortization of amounts related to certain purchased intangible assets, any of which items could negatively impact our future results of operations. We may also record goodwill in connection with an acquisition and incur goodwill impairment charges in the future.

In addition, if we are unsuccessful at integrating such acquisitions, or the technologies associated with such acquisitions, into our company, the revenue and operating results of the combined company could be adversely affected. Any integration process may result in unforeseen operating difficulties and require significant time and resources, and we may not be able to manage the process successfully. In particular, we may encounter difficulties assimilating or integrating the companies, solutions, technologies, personnel or operations we acquire, particularly if the key personnel are geographically dispersed or choose not to work for us. Acquisitions may also disrupt our core business, divert our resources and require significant management attention that would otherwise be available for development of our business. We may not successfully evaluate or utilize the acquired technology or personnel, or accurately forecast the financial impact of an acquisition transaction, including accounting charges. If we fail to properly evaluate, execute or integrate acquisitions or investments, the anticipated benefits may not be realized, we may be exposed to unknown or unanticipated liabilities, and our business and prospects could be harmed.

Defects, errors or vulnerabilities in our solutions, the failure of our solutions to block a virus or prevent a security breach or a false detection of applications, viruses, spyware, vulnerability exploits, data patterns or URL categories could harm our reputation and adversely impact our operating results.

Because our solutions are complex, they have contained and may in the future contain design or manufacturing defects or errors that are not detected until after their commercial release and deployment by our customers. For example, from time to time, certain of our customers have reported defects in our solutions related to performance, functionality and compatibility that were not detected before shipping the solution. Additionally, defects may cause our solutions to be vulnerable to security attacks, cause them to fail to help secure networks or temporarily interrupt customers’ networking traffic. Because the techniques used by computer hackers to access or sabotage networks change frequently and generally are not recognized until launched against a target, our solutions may not be able to protect our customers’ networks. Our security solutions may also fail to detect or prevent viruses, worms or similar threats due to a number of reasons such as the evolving nature of such threats and the continual emergence of new threats that we may fail to add to our threat intelligence database or other virus databases in time to protect our customers’ networks. In addition, defects or errors in our subscription updates or our solutions could result in a failure to effectively update customers’ solutions and thereby leave our customers vulnerable to attacks. Our data centers and networks may experience technical failures and downtime, may fail to distribute appropriate updates, or may fail to meet the increased requirements of a growing customer base, any of which could temporarily or permanently expose our customers’ networks, leaving their networks unprotected against the latest security threats. Any defects, errors or vulnerabilities in our solutions could result in:

Furthermore, our security solutions may falsely detect applications, content or threats that do not actually exist based on our classifications of application type, virus, malware, vulnerability exploits, data or URL categories. This risk is increased by the inclusion of “heuristics” analysis in our solutions, which attempts to identify threats not based on any known signatures but based on characteristics or anomalies which indicate that a particular item may be a threat. These false positives, while typical in our industry, may impair the perceived reliability of our solutions and may therefore adversely affect market acceptance of our solutions. Also, our anti-spam and anti-malware solutions may falsely identify emails or programs as unwanted spam or potentially unwanted programs, or alternatively fail to properly identify unwanted emails or programs, particularly as spam emails or malware are often designed to circumvent anti-spam or anti-malware solutions. Parties whose emails or programs are blocked by our solutions may seek redress against us for labeling them as spammers or malware or for interfering with their business. In addition, false identification of emails or programs as unwanted spam or potentially unwanted programs may reduce the adoption of our solutions. If our solutions restrict important files or applications based on falsely identifying them as malware or some other item that should be restricted, this could adversely affect customers’ systems and cause material system failures. Any such false identification of important files or applications could result in damage to our reputation, negative publicity, loss of customers and sales, increased costs to remedy any problem and risk of litigation.

If our security measures are breached or unauthorized access to customer data is otherwise obtained or our customers experience data losses, our brand, reputation and business could be harmed and we may incur significant liabilities.

Our customers rely on our security and storage solutions to secure and store their data, which may include financial records, credit card information, business information, customer information, health information, other personally identifiable information or other sensitive personal information. A breach of our network security and systems or other events that cause the loss or public disclosure of, or access by third parties to, our customers’ stored files or data could have serious negative consequences for our business, including possible fines, penalties and damages, reduced demand for our solutions, an unwillingness of our customers to use our solutions, harm to our brand and reputation, and time-consuming and expensive litigation. The techniques used to obtain unauthorized access, disable or degrade service, or sabotage systems change frequently, often are not recognized until launched against a target, and may originate from less regulated or remote areas around the world. As a result, we may be unable to proactively prevent these techniques, implement adequate preventative or reactionary measures, or enforce the laws and regulations that govern such activities. In addition, because of the large amount of data that we store for our customers, it is possible that hardware failures, human errors or errors in our systems could result in data loss or corruption, or cause the information that we collect to be incomplete or contain inaccuracies that our customers regard as significant. If our customers experience any data loss, or any data corruption or inaccuracies, whether caused by security breaches or otherwise, our brand, reputation and business could be harmed. Moreover, if a high profile security breach occurs with respect to another provider of cloud services, our clients and potential clients may lose trust in the security of the cloud business model generally, which could adversely impact our ability to retain existing clients or attract new ones.

If an actual or perceived breach of network security occurs in our internal systems, our services may be perceived as not being secure and clients may curtail or stop using our solutions.

As a provider of network security solutions, we are a high profile target and our networks and solutions may have vulnerabilities that may be targeted by hackers and could be targeted by attacks specifically designed to disrupt our business and harm our reputation. We will not succeed unless the marketplace continues to be confident that we provide effective network and security protection. If an actual or perceived breach of network security occurs in our internal systems it could adversely affect the market perception of our solutions. We may not be able to correct any security flaws or vulnerabilities promptly, or at all. In addition, such a security breach could impair our ability to operate our business, including our ability to provide subscription and support services to our customers. If this happens, our business and operating results could be adversely affected.

Because our solutions could be used to collect and store personal information of our customers’ employees or customers, privacy concerns could result in additional cost and liability to us or inhibit sales of our solutions.

Personal privacy has become a significant issue in the United States and in many other countries where we offer our solutions. The regulatory framework for privacy issues worldwide is currently complex and evolving, and it is likely to remain uncertain for the foreseeable future. Many federal, state and foreign government bodies and agencies have adopted or are considering adopting laws and regulations regarding the collection, use and disclosure of personal information. In the United States, these include rules and regulations promulgated under the authority of the Federal Trade Commission, the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 and state breach notification laws. Internationally, virtually every jurisdiction in which we operate has established its own data security and privacy legal framework with which we or our customers must comply, including the Data Protection Directive established in the European Union (the “EU”) and the Federal Data Protection Act recently passed in Germany.

In addition to government regulation, privacy advocacy and industry groups may propose new and different self-regulatory standards that either legally or contractually apply to us. Because the interpretation and application of privacy and data protection laws are still uncertain, it is possible that these laws may be interpreted and applied in a manner that is in conflict with one another, and is inconsistent our existing data management practices or the features of our solutions. If so, in addition to the possibility of fines, lawsuits and other claims, we could be required to fundamentally change our business activities and practices or modify our software, which could have an adverse effect on our business. Any inability to adequately address privacy concerns, even if unfounded, or comply with applicable privacy or data protection laws, regulations and policies, could result in additional cost and liability to us, damage our reputation, inhibit sales and harm our business.

Furthermore, the costs of compliance with, and other burdens imposed by, the laws, regulations, and policies that are applicable to the businesses of our customers may limit the use and adoption of, and reduce the overall demand for, our solutions. Privacy concerns, whether valid or not valid, may inhibit market adoption of our solutions particularly in certain industries and foreign countries.

Our business is subject to the risks of warranty claims and product liability claims and given our 30-day right to return policy on many of our solutions, we may experience increased frequency of returns, any of which may adversely affect our operating results and financial performance.

Our solutions have contained and may contain undetected defects or errors, especially when first introduced or when new versions are released. Defects or errors could affect the performance of our solutions and could delay the development or release of new solutions or new versions of solutions, adversely affect our reputation and our customers’ willingness to buy solutions from us and adversely affect market

acceptance or perception of our offerings. Any such errors or delays in releasing new solutions or new versions of solutions or allegations of unsatisfactory performance could cause us to lose revenue or market share, increase our service costs, cause us to incur substantial costs in redesigning the solutions, cause us to lose significant customers, subject us to liability for damages and divert our resources from other tasks, any one of which could materially and adversely affect our business, operating results and financial condition. Furthermore, we offer customers a 30-day right to return for

many of our solutions which is integral to our sales model. If we experience appliance defects, or if we experience increased frequency of returns, our sales cycles, operating results and financial performance may be adversely affected.

In addition, the occurrence of hardware or software errors which resulted in increased warranty or support claims could result in increased expenses or require us to maintain greater warranty reserves which would have an adverse effect on our business and financial performance.

Our ability to increase sales of our solutions is highly dependent on the quality of our customer support, and our failure to offer high-quality support would have an adverse effect on our business, reputation and operating results.

Our solutions are designed to be deployed by customers in resource-constrained IT environments. Our customers depend on our support services to assist them with questions as they implement our solutions within their IT infrastructure, and after deployment, our customers depend on our support organization to quickly resolve any issues relating to those solutions. A significant level of high-quality support is critical to ensure high rates of renewals and cross-selling of our solutions. If we do not effectively assist our customers in deploying our solutions, succeed in helping them quickly resolve post-deployment issues or provide effective ongoing support, it could adversely affect our ability to sell our solutions to existing customers, decrease our subscription renewal rates and harm our reputation with potential new customers, all of which would have an adverse effect on our business, reputation and operating results.

If we are unable to hire, retain, train and motivate qualified personnel and senior management, or if our senior management team is unable to perform effectively, our business could suffer.

Our future success depends, in part, on our ability to continue to attract and retain highly skilled personnel and the continued services of our senior management and other key personnel to execute on our business plan and to identify and pursue new opportunities and solution innovations. The loss of the services of our senior management or any of our key personnel, the inability to attract or retain qualified personnel, or delays in hiring required personnel, particularly in engineering and sales and marketing, could significantly delay or prevent the achievement of our development and strategic objectives, and may adversely affect our business, financial condition and operating results. Although we have entered into employment offer letters with our key personnel, these agreements have no specific duration and constitute at-will employment. Our productivity and the quality of our solutions may be adversely affected if we do not integrate and train our new employees quickly and effectively. Furthermore, if we are not effective in retaining our key personnel, our business could be adversely impacted and our operating results and financial condition could be harmed.

Competition for highly skilled personnel is often intense, especially in the San Francisco Bay Area where we have a substantial presence and need for highly skilled personnel. We may not be successful in attracting, integrating or retaining qualified personnel to fulfill our current or future needs. Also, to the extent we hire personnel from competitors, we may be subject to allegations that they have been improperly solicited, or that they have divulged proprietary or other confidential information, or that their former employers own their inventions or other work product.

We may be unsuccessful in managing or expanding our operations, which could adversely affect our operating results.

We have office locations throughout the United States and in various international locations, including Austria, India and the United Kingdom. If we are unable to effectively manage a large and geographically dispersed group of employees or to anticipate our future growth and personnel needs, our business may be adversely affected. As we expand our business, we add complexity to our organization and must expand and adapt our operational infrastructure and effectively coordinate throughout our organization. For example, we recently leased additional office space in San Jose, California, and intend to hire new employees and have relocated our manufacturing facility

to this location from our headquarters in Campbell, California. We recently relocated our manufacturing to this new facility. As a result, we have incurred and expect to continue to incur additional expense and the additional location may disrupt our operations and distract our management team. Failure to manage any future growth effectively could result in increased costs, negatively impact our customers’ satisfaction with our solutions, and harm our operating results.

Our customer-centric and collaborative corporate culture has contributed to our success, and if we cannot maintain this culture as we grow, we could lose the innovation, creativity and teamwork fostered by our culture, and our business may be harmed.

We believe that a critical contributor to our success has been our corporate culture, which we believe fosters innovation, creativity, a customer-centric focus, collaboration and loyalty. As we grow and change, we may find it difficult to maintain these important aspects of our corporate culture, which could limit our ability to innovate and operate effectively. Any failure to preserve our culture could also negatively affect our ability to retain and recruit personnel, continue to perform at current levels or execute on our business strategy.

We rely on third-party distributors and channel partners to fulfill substantially all of our sales orders. If our distributors and reseller channel partners fail to perform, our ability to sell our solutions will be limited, and, if we fail to optimize our distributor and reseller channel partner model going forward, our operating results will be harmed.

Substantially all of our sales orders are fulfilled by our channel partners, which include distributors and resellers. We also depend upon our channel partners to manage the customer sales process and to generate sales opportunities. To the extent our channel partners are unsuccessful in fulfilling our sales, managing the sales process or selling our solutions, or we are unable to enter into arrangements with, and retain a sufficient number of high-quality, motivated channel partners in each of the regions in which we sell our offerings, our ability to sell our solutions and operating results will be harmed. In order to support our growth strategy, we recently entered into an agreement with an additional distributor in North America. If we are unable to successfully develop our relationship with the new distributor, or if we experience reseller shifts between distributors or any channel conflict occurs, it could negatively impact our ability to meet our revenue and profitability goals.

We provide our channel partners with specific programs to assist them in selling our solutions, but there can be no assurance that these programs will be effective. In addition, our channel partners may be unsuccessful in marketing, selling and supporting our solutions. Our channel partners do not have minimum purchase requirements. They may also market, sell and support solutions that are competitive with ours, and may devote more resources to the marketing, sales and support of such solutions. Our agreements with our channel partners may generally be terminated for any reason by either party with advance written notice and our channel partners may stop selling our solutions at any time. We cannot assure you that we will retain these channel partners, that channel partners will sell our solutions effectively or that we will be able to secure additional or replacement channel partners. The loss of one or more of our significant channel partners or a decline in the number or size of orders from them could harm our operating results. In addition, our channel partner sales structure could subject us to lawsuits, potential liability, and reputational harm if, for example, any of our channel partners misrepresent the functionality of our solutions to customers or violate laws or our corporate policies.

We are exposed to fluctuations in currency exchange rates, which could negatively affect our financial condition and operating results.

Given our volume of international sales, a substantial portion of our total revenue is subject to foreign currency risk. For example, in the ~~three~~six months ended ~~May~~August 31, 2014, ~~32%~~31% of our total revenue was generated from sales to customers located outside of the United States. Additionally, a strengthening of the U.S. dollar could increase the real cost of our solutions to our customers outside of the United States, which could adversely affect our financial condition and operating results. In addition, an increasing portion of our operating expenses is incurred outside of the United States, is denominated in foreign currencies, and is subject to fluctuations due to changes in foreign currency exchange rates. If we are not able to successfully manage or hedge against the risks associated with currency fluctuations, our financial condition and operating results could be adversely affected.

We rely on a single source or a limited number of sources for some of our components. Insufficient supply and inventory may result in lost sales opportunities or delayed revenue, while excess inventory may harm our gross profit.

Our inventory management systems and related supply chain visibility tools may be inadequate to enable us to forecast accurately and effectively manage the supply of our components. Additionally, we carry very little inventory of our appliances or components, and we rely on our suppliers to deliver necessary components in a timely manner. Insufficient supply levels may lead to shortages that result in delayed revenue or loss of sales opportunities altogether as potential customers turn to competitors’ solutions that could be more readily available. Additionally, any increases in the time required to manufacture our solutions could adversely affect our business, brand, sales cycle and reputation. If we are unable to effectively manage our supply and inventory, our operating results could be adversely affected.

We currently depend on a single source or a limited number of sources for certain components used in the manufacture of our solutions. We are therefore subject to the risk of shortages in supply of these components and the risk that component suppliers discontinue or modify components used in our solutions. If these suppliers were to discontinue production of a necessary part or component, we would be required to expend resources and time in locating and integrating replacement parts or components from another vendor. In addition, the introduction by component suppliers of new versions of their components, particularly if not anticipated by us, could require us to expend resources to incorporate these new components into our solutions. Our reliance on a single source or a limited number of suppliers involves a number of additional risks, including risks related to:

In addition, for certain components, we are subject to potential price increases and limited availability as a result of market demand for these components. In the past, unexpected demand for computer and network products has caused worldwide shortages of certain electronic parts. If similar shortages occur in the future, our business could be adversely affected. We rely on purchase orders rather than long-term contracts with these suppliers, and as a result we might not be able to secure sufficient components, even if they were available, at reasonable prices or of acceptable quality to build appliances in a timely manner and, therefore, might not be able to meet customer demands for our solutions, which would have a material and adverse effect on our business, operating results and financial condition.

Assertions by third parties of infringement or other violations by us of their intellectual property rights, or other lawsuits brought against us, could result in significant costs and substantially harm our business and operating results.

Patent and other intellectual property disputes are common in the IT markets in which we compete. Some companies in the IT markets in which we compete, including some of our competitors, own large numbers of patents, copyrights, trademarks and trade secrets, which they may use to assert claims of infringement, misappropriation or other violations of intellectual property rights against us. There also is a market for intellectual property rights and a competitor, or other entity, could acquire intellectual property rights and assert similar claims based on the acquired intellectual property. They may also assert such claims against our customers or channel partners. As the number of patents and competitors in our market increase and overlaps occur, claims of infringement, misappropriation and other violations of intellectual property rights may increase. From time to time, we face allegations that we, our customers or our channel partners have infringed, misappropriated and violated intellectual property rights, including allegations made by our competitors or by non-practicing entities. Our broad solution portfolio and the number of network and IT markets in which we compete further exacerbate this risk. Any claim of infringement, misappropriation or other violation of intellectual property rights by a third party, even those without merit, could cause us to incur substantial costs defending against the claim and could distract our management from our business.

In addition, future assertions of patent rights by third parties, and any resulting litigation, may involve non-practicing entities or other adverse patent owners who have no relevant revenue and against whom our own patents may therefore provide little or no deterrence or protection. We cannot assure you that we are not infringing or otherwise violating any third-party intellectual property rights.

An adverse outcome of a dispute may require us to pay substantial damages including treble damages if we are found to have willfully infringed a third party’s patents or copyrights; cease making, using, selling, licensing, importing or otherwise commercializing solutions that are alleged to infringe or misappropriate the intellectual property of others; expend additional development resources to attempt to redesign our solutions or otherwise to develop non-infringing technology, which may not be successful; enter into potentially unfavorable royalty or license agreements in order to obtain the right to use necessary technologies or intellectual property rights or have royalty obligations imposed by a court; and indemnify our customers, partners and other third parties. Furthermore, we have agreed in certain instances to defend our channel partners against third-party claims asserting infringement of certain intellectual property rights, which may include patents, copyrights, trademarks or trade secrets, and to pay judgments entered on such claims. Any damages or royalty obligations we may become subject to, any prohibition against our commercializing our solutions and any third-party indemnity we may need to provide, as a result of an adverse outcome could harm our operating results.

Our use of open source technology could impose limitations on our ability to commercialize our solutions.

We use open source software in our solutions, and although we monitor our use of open source software to avoid subjecting our solutions to conditions we do not intend, the terms of many open source licenses have not been interpreted by U.S. courts. As a result, there is a risk that these licenses could be construed in a way that could impose unanticipated conditions or restrictions on our ability to commercialize our solutions. In such an event, we could be required to seek licenses from third parties to continue offering our solutions, to make our proprietary code generally available in source code form, to re-engineer our solutions or to discontinue the sale of our solutions if re-engineering could not be accomplished on a timely basis, any of which could adversely affect our business, operating results and financial condition.

Failure to protect our proprietary technology and intellectual property rights could substantially harm our business and operating results.

The success of our business depends on our ability to protect and enforce our patents, trademarks, copyrights, trade secrets and other intellectual property rights. We attempt to protect our intellectual property under patent, trademark, copyright and trade secret laws, and through a combination of confidentiality procedures, contractual provisions and other methods, all of which offer only limited protection.

As of ~~May~~August 31, 2014, we had 5054 issued patents in the United States, but this number of patents is relatively small in comparison to some of our competitors and potential competitors. Additionally, as of ~~May~~August 31, 2014, we had

42 34 pending U.S. patent applications, and may file additional patent applications in the future. The process of obtaining patent protection is expensive and time-consuming, and we may not be able to prosecute all necessary or desirable patent applications at a reasonable cost or in a timely manner. We may choose not to seek patent protection for certain innovations and may choose not to pursue patent protection in certain jurisdictions. Furthermore, it is possible that our patent applications may not issue as granted patents, that the scope of our issued patents will be insufficient or not have the coverage originally sought, that our issued patents will not provide us with any competitive advantages, and that our patents and other intellectual property rights may be challenged by others or invalidated through administrative process or litigation. In addition, issuance of a patent does not guarantee that we have an absolute right to practice the patented invention, or that we have the right to exclude others from practicing the claimed invention. As a result, we may not be able to obtain adequate patent protection or to enforce our issued patents effectively.

In addition to patented technology, we rely on our unpatented proprietary technology and trade secrets. Despite our efforts to protect our proprietary technology and trade secrets, unauthorized parties may attempt to misappropriate, reverse engineer or otherwise obtain and use them. The contractual provisions that we enter into with employees, consultants, partners, vendors and customers may not prevent unauthorized use or disclosure of our proprietary technology or intellectual property rights and may not provide an adequate remedy in the event of unauthorized use or disclosure of our proprietary technology or intellectual property rights. Moreover, policing unauthorized use of our technologies, solutions and intellectual property is difficult, expensive and time-consuming, particularly in foreign countries where the laws may not be as protective of intellectual property rights as those in the United States and where mechanisms for enforcement of intellectual property rights may be weak. We may be unable to determine the extent of any unauthorized use or infringement of our solutions, technologies or intellectual property rights.

From time to time, legal action by us may be necessary to enforce our patents and other intellectual property rights, to protect our trade secrets, to determine the validity and scope of the intellectual property rights of others or to defend against claims of infringement or invalidity. Such litigation could result in substantial costs and diversion of resources and could negatively affect our business, operating results, financial condition and cash flows. If we are unable to protect our intellectual property rights, we may find ourselves at a competitive disadvantage to others who need not incur the additional expense, time and effort required to create the innovative solutions that have enabled us to be successful to date.

We rely on the availability of third-party licenses for some of our solutions.

Some of our solutions include software or other intellectual property licensed from third parties. It may be necessary in the future to renew licenses relating to various aspects of these solutions or to seek new licenses for existing or new solutions. There can be no assurance that the necessary licenses will be available on acceptable terms, if at all. The inability to obtain certain licenses or other rights or to obtain such licenses or rights on favorable terms, could result in delays in solution releases until equivalent technology can be identified, licensed or developed, if at all, and integrated into our solutions and may have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results and financial condition. In addition, third parties may allege that additional licenses are required for our use of their software or intellectual property, and we may be unable to obtain such licenses on commercially reasonable terms or at all. Moreover, the inclusion in our solutions of software or other intellectual property licensed from third parties on a nonexclusive basis could limit our ability to differentiate our solutions from those of our competitors.

As a public company, we are obligated to develop and maintain proper and effective internal c~~ontrol~~ control over financial reporting. We may not complete our analysis of our internal control over financial reporting in a timely manner, or these internal controls may not be determined to be effective, which may adversely affect investor confidence in our company and, as a result, the value of our common stock.

Ensuring that we have adequate internal financial and accounting controls and procedures in place so that we can produce accurate financial statements on a timely basis is a costly and time-consuming effort. Our internal control over financial reporting is designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements in accordance with GAAP. We are in the early stages of the

costly and challenging process of compiling the system and processing documentation necessary to perform the evaluation needed to comply with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (the “Sarbanes-Oxley Act”). We may not be able to complete our evaluation, testing and any required remediation in a timely fashion. During the evaluation and testing process, if we identify one or more material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting, we will be unable to assert that our internal controls are effective.

If we are unable to assert that our internal control over financial reporting is effective, we could lose investor confidence in the accuracy and completeness of our financial reports, which would cause the price of our common stock to decline, and we may be subject to investigation or sanctions by the SEC.

We are required, pursuant to Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act to furnish a report by management on, among other things, the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of the end of our fiscal year 2015. This assessment will need to include disclosure of any material weaknesses identified by our management in our internal control over financial reporting.

We are required to disclose changes made in our internal control and procedures on a quarterly basis. However, our independent registered public accounting firm will not be required to report on the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting pursuant to Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act until the later of the year following our first annual report required to be filed with the SEC, or the date we are no longer an “emerging growth company” as defined in the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act of 2012 (the “JOBS Act”) if we take advantage of the exemptions contained in the JOBS Act. At such time, our independent registered public accounting firm may issue a report that is adverse in the event it is not satisfied with the level at which our controls are documented, designed or operating. Our remediation efforts may not enable us to avoid a material weakness in the future.

Additionally, to comply with the requirements of being a public company, we may need to undertake various actions, such as implementing new internal controls and procedures and hiring accounting or internal audit staff, which may adversely affect our operating results and financial condition.

There are limitations on the effectiveness of controls, and the failure of our control systems may materially and adversely impact us.

We do not expect that disclosure controls or internal controls over financial reporting will prevent all errors and all fraud. A control system, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the control system’s objectives will be met. Further, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, have been detected. Failure of our control systems to prevent error or fraud could materially and adversely impact us.

Significant developments in IT infrastructure deployments, particularly cloud computing and other alternative IT infrastructure technologies, may materially adversely affect the demand for our products.

Developments or changes in IT infrastructure, such as the emergence of hosted cloud storage, software as a service and mobile data access are driving significant changes in storage and compute architectures and solution requirements as well as presenting significant challenges in the security market, which may materially and adversely affect our business and prospects in ways we do not currently anticipate. The impact of these trends on overall long-term growth patterns is uncertain, especially in resource-constrained environments. The emergence of cloud computing and other alternative IT infrastructure technologies, in which technology services are provided on a remote-access basis, may have a significant impact on the market for security and storage solutions and may result in rapid changes in customer demands. This could be the case even if such advances do not deliver all of the benefits of our solutions. If alternative models gain traction, any failure by us to develop new or enhanced technologies or processes, or to react to changes or advances in existing technologies, could adversely affect our business and operating results.

If our solutions do not interoperate with our end-customers’ infrastructure, sales of our solutions could be negatively affected, which would harm our business.

Our solutions must interoperate with our end-customers’ existing infrastructure, which often have different specifications, utilize multiple protocol standards, deploy products from multiple vendors, and contain multiple generations of products that have been added over time. As a result, when problems occur in a network, it may be difficult to identify the sources of these problems. Any delays in identifying the sources of problems or in providing necessary modifications to our software or hardware could have a negative impact on our reputation and our customers’ satisfaction with our solutions, and our ability to sell solutions could be adversely affected. In addition, customers may require our solutions to comply with certain security or other certifications and standards. If our solutions are late in achieving or fail to achieve compliance with these certifications and standards, or our competitors achieve compliance with these certifications and standards, we may be disqualified from selling our solutions to such end-customers, or at a competitive disadvantage, which would harm our business, operating results and financial condition.

If our solutions fail to help our customers achieve and maintain compliance with government regulations and industry standards, our business and operating results could be materially adversely affected.

We generate a portion of our revenues from our solutions because they help organizations achieve and maintain compliance with government regulations and industry standards. For example, many of our customers purchase our security and storage solutions to help them comply with the security standards developed and maintained by the Payment Card Industry Security Standards Council (the “PCI Council”), which apply to companies that process or store credit card information. Industry organizations like the PCI Council may significantly change their security standards with little or no notice, including changes that could make their standards more or less onerous for businesses. Governments may also adopt new laws or regulations, or make changes to existing laws or regulations, that could impact whether our solutions enable our customers to demonstrate, maintain or audit their compliance. If we are unable to adapt our solutions to changing regulatory standards in a timely manner, or if our solutions fail to expedite our customers’ compliance initiatives, our customers may lose confidence in our solutions and could switch to solutions offered by our competitors. In addition, if regulations and standards related to data security are changed in a manner that makes them less onerous, our customers may view government and industry regulatory compliance as less critical to their businesses, and our customers may be less willing to purchase our solutions. In either case, our business, financial condition and operating results may suffer.

Our sales to government entities are subject to a number of challenges and risks.

We sell to state and local governmental agency customers, particularly schools, and we may in the future increase sales to government entities. Sales to government entities are subject to a number of challenges and risks. Selling to government entities can be highly competitive, expensive and time consuming, often requiring significant upfront time and expense without any assurance that these efforts will generate a sale. Government certification requirements for solutions like ours may change and in doing so restrict our ability to sell into the federal government sector until we have attained the revised certification. Government demand and payment for our solutions may be impacted by public sector budgetary cycles and funding authorizations, with funding reductions or delays adversely affecting public sector demand for our solutions. Government entities may have statutory, contractual or other legal rights to terminate contracts with our distributors and resellers for convenience or due to a default, and any such termination may adversely impact our future operating results.

Our failure to generate the significant capital necessary to expand our operations and invest in new solutions could reduce our ability to compete and could harm our business.

We may need to raise additional funds in the future, and we may not be able to obtain additional debt or equity financing on favorable terms, if at all. If we raise additional equity financing, our stockholders may experience significant dilution of their ownership interests and the per share value of our common stock could decline. Furthermore, if we engage in debt financing, the holders of debt would have priority over the holders of our common stock, and we may be required to accept terms that restrict our ability to incur additional indebtedness. We may also be required to take other actions that would otherwise be in the interests of the debt holders and force us to maintain specified liquidity or other ratios, any of which could harm our business, operating results and financial condition. If we need additional capital and cannot raise it on acceptable terms, we may not be able to, among other things:

Our failure to do any of these things could adversely affect our business, financial condition and operating results.

The terms of our existing credit facility with Silicon Valley Bank and future indebtedness could restrict our operations, particularly our ability to respond to changes in our business or to take specified actions.

Our existing credit facility with Silicon Valley Bank (“SVB”) contains, and any future indebtedness would likely contain, a number of restrictive covenants that impose significant operating and financial restrictions on us, including restrictions on our ability to take actions that may be in our best interests. Our credit facility requires us to satisfy specified financial covenants. Our ability to meet those financial covenants can be affected by events beyond our control, and we may not be able to continue to meet those covenants. A breach of any of these covenants or the occurrence of other events specified in the credit facility could result in an event of default under the credit facility. Upon the occurrence of an event of default, SVB could elect to declare all amounts outstanding under the credit facility to be immediately due and payable and terminate all commitments to extend further credit. If we were unable to repay those amounts, SVB could proceed against the collateral granted to them to secure such indebtedness. We have pledged all of our assets, including our intellectual property, as collateral under the credit facility. If SVB accelerates the repayment of borrowings, if any, we may not have sufficient funds to repay our existing debt.

We are exposed to the credit risk of some of our distributors, resellers and customers and to credit exposure in weakened markets, which could result in material losses.

Most of our sales are on an open credit basis. Although we have programs in place that are designed to monitor and mitigate these risks, and our broad customer base and channel partner network mitigate these risks, we cannot assure you these programs will be effective in reducing our credit risks, especially as we expand our business internationally. If we are unable to adequately control these risks, our business, operating results and financial condition could be adversely affected.

If our estimates or judgments relating to our critical accounting policies are based on assumptions that change or prove to be incorrect, our operating results could fall below expectations of securities analysts and investors, resulting in a decline in our stock price.

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Our operating results may be adversely affected if our assumptions change or if actual circumstances differ from those in our assumptions, which could cause our operating results to fall below the expectations of securities analysts and investors, resulting in a decline in our stock price. Significant assumptions and estimates used in preparing our consolidated financial statements include those related to revenue recognition, stock-based compensation, valuation of inventory ~~warranty liabilities~~ and accounting for income taxes.

Unanticipated changes in effective tax rates or adverse outcomes resulting from examination of our income or other tax returns could adversely affect our operating results and financial condition.

We are subject to income taxes in the United States and various foreign jurisdictions, and our domestic and international tax liabilities will be subject to the allocation of expenses in differing jurisdictions. Our future effective tax rates could be subject to volatility or adversely affected by a number of factors, including:

In addition, we may be subject to audits of our income and sales taxes by the Internal Revenue Service and other foreign and state tax authorities. Outcomes from these audits could have an adverse effect on our operating results and financial condition.

Changes in financial accounting standards or practices may cause adverse, unexpected financial reporting fluctuations and affect our reported results of operations.

Changes in financial accounting standards or practices can have a significant effect on our reported results and may even affect our reporting of transactions completed before the change is effective. New accounting pronouncements and varying interpretations of accounting pronouncements have occurred and may occur in the future. Changes to existing rules or the questioning of current practices may adversely affect our business and financial results.

Our business is subject to the risks of earthquakes, fire, power outages, floods and other catastrophic events and to interruption by man-made problems such as terrorism.

A significant natural disaster, such as an earthquake, fire, flood or significant power outage could have a material adverse impact on our business, operating results and financial condition. Both our corporate headquarters and the location where our solutions are manufactured are located in the San Francisco Bay Area, a region known for seismic activity. In addition, natural disasters could affect our supply chain, manufacturing vendors, logistics providers’ or data center hosting providers’ ability to provide materials and perform services on a timely basis. In the event our or our service providers’ IT systems or manufacturing or logistics abilities are hindered by any of the events discussed

above, shipments could be delayed, and our solutions could become unavailable resulting in missed financial targets, such as revenue and shipment targets, for a particular quarter. In addition, acts of terrorism and other geo-political unrest could cause disruptions in our business or the business of our supply chain, manufacturers, logistics providers, partners or customers or the economy as a whole. Any disruption in the business of our supply chain, manufacturers, logistics providers, data center hosting partners or customers that impacts sales at the end of a fiscal quarter could have a significant adverse impact on our quarterly results. All of the aforementioned risks may be further increased if the disaster recovery plans for us and our suppliers prove to be inadequate. To the extent that any of the above should result in delays or cancellations of customer orders, or the delay in the manufacture, deployment or shipment of our solutions, our business, financial condition and operating results would be adversely affected.

If we fail to comply with environmental requirements, our business, financial condition, operating results and reputation could be adversely affected.

We are subject to various environmental laws and regulations including laws governing the hazardous material content of our solutions and laws relating to the collection of and recycling of electrical and electronic equipment. Examples of these laws and regulations include the EU Restrictions of Hazardous Substances Directive (the “RoHS Directive”) and the EU Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment Directive (the “WEEE Directive”), as well as the implementing legislation of the EU member states. Similar laws and regulations have been passed or are pending in China, South Korea, Norway and Japan and may be enacted in other regions, including in the United States, and we are, or may in the future be, subject to these laws and regulations.

The RoHS Directive and the similar laws of other jurisdictions ban the use of certain hazardous materials such as lead, mercury and cadmium in the manufacture of electrical equipment, including our solutions. Currently, we and other manufacturers of our hardware appliances and major component part suppliers comply with the RoHS Directive requirements. However, if there are changes to this or other laws (or their interpretation) or if new similar laws are passed in other jurisdictions, we may be required to re-engineer our solutions to use components compatible with these regulations. This re-engineering and component substitution could result in additional costs to us or disrupt our operations or logistics.

The WEEE Directive requires electronic goods producers to be responsible for the collection, recycling and treatment of such solutions. Changes in interpretation of the directive may cause us to incur costs or have additional regulatory requirements to meet in the future in order to comply with this directive, or with any similar laws adopted in other jurisdictions.

Our failure to comply with past, present and future similar laws could result in reduced sales of our solutions, inventory write-offs, reputational damage, penalties and other sanctions, any of which could harm our business and financial condition. We also expect that our solutions will be affected by new environmental laws and regulations on an ongoing basis. To date, our expenditures for environmental compliance have not had a material impact on our results of operations or cash flows, and although we cannot predict the future impact of such laws or regulations, they will likely result in additional costs and may increase penalties associated with violations or require us to change the content of our solutions or how they are manufactured, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results and financial condition.

New regulations related to conflict minerals may cause us to incur additional expenses and could limit the supply and increase the costs of certain metals used in the manufacturing of our appliances.

As a public company, we are subject to new requirements under the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 (the “Dodd-Frank Act”) that require us to diligence, disclose and report whether or not our appliances contain conflict minerals. The implementation of these new requirements could adversely affect the sourcing, availability and pricing of the materials used in the manufacture of components used in our solutions. In addition, we will incur additional costs to comply with the disclosure requirements, including costs related to conducting diligence procedures to determine the sources of conflict minerals that may be used or necessary to the production of our appliances and, if applicable, potential changes to appliances, processes or sources of supply as a consequence of such verification activities. It is also possible that we may face reputational harm if we determine that certain of our appliances contain minerals not determined to be conflict free or if we are unable to alter our appliances, processes or sources of supply to avoid such materials.

From time to time, we have released, and may continue to release guidance in our quarterly earnings conference call, quarterly earnings releases, or otherwise, regarding our future performance that represents our management’s estimates as of the date of release. This guidance, which includes forward-looking statements, has been and will be based on projections prepared by our management. These projections are not prepared with a view toward compliance with published guidelines of the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, and neither our registered public accountants nor any other independent expert or outside party compiles or examines the projections. Accordingly, no such person expresses any opinion or any other form of assurance with respect to the projections.

Projections are based upon a number of assumptions and estimates that, while presented with numerical specificity, are inherently subject to significant business, economic and competitive uncertainties and contingencies, many of which are beyond our control and are based upon specific assumptions with respect to future business decisions, some of which will change. We intend to state possible outcomes as high and low ranges which are intended to provide a sensitivity analysis as variables are changed but are not intended to imply that actual results could not fall outside of the suggested ranges. The principal reason that we release guidance is to provide a basis for our management to discuss our business outlook with analysts and investors. We do not accept any responsibility for any projections or reports published by any such third parties.

Guidance is necessarily speculative in nature, and it can be expected that some or all of the assumptions underlying the guidance furnished by us will not materialize or will vary significantly from actual results. Accordingly, our guidance is only an estimate of what management believes is realizable as of the date of release. Actual results may vary from our guidance and the variations may be material. We undertake no obligation to make revisions or publicly update our guidance in advance of actual results unless required by law. In light of the foregoing, investors are urged to consider all of the information we make publicly available in making an investment decision regarding our common stock and not rely solely upon our guidance.

Any failure to successfully implement our operating strategy or the occurrence of any of the events or circumstances set forth in this “Risk Factors” section could result in the actual operating results being different from our guidance, and the differences may be adverse and material.

Our share price has been and may continue to be volatile, and you may be unable to sell your shares at or above the price at which you purchased your stock.

Technology stocks have historically experienced high levels of volatility. The trading price of our common stock has been and is likely to continue to be highly volatile and subject to wide fluctuations in response to various factors, some of which are beyond our control and may not be related to our operating performance. Since shares of our common stock were sold in our initial public offering (“IPO”) in November 2013 at a price of $18.00 per share, the reported high and low sales prices of our common stock have ranged from $18.63 to $44.40 through ~~May~~August 31,

2014. These fluctuations could cause you to lose all or part of your investment in our common stock. Factors that may cause the market price of our common stock to fluctuate include:

In addition, if the market for technology stocks, or the stock market in general, experiences a loss of investor confidence, the trading price of our common stock could decline for reasons unrelated to our business, operating results or financial condition. The trading price of our common stock might also decline in reaction to events that affect other companies in our industry even if these events do not directly affect us.

In the past, following periods of volatility in the market price of a company’s securities, securities class action litigation has often been brought against that company. If our stock price is volatile, we may become the target of securities litigation. Securities litigation could result in substantial costs and divert our management’s attention and resources from our business, and this could have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results and financial condition.

Sales of outstanding shares of our common stock into the market in the future could cause the market price of our common stock to drop significantly.

If our existing stockholders sell, or indicate an intent to sell, substantial amounts of our common stock in the public market, the trading price of our common stock could decline. As of ~~May~~August 31, 2014, there were ~~51,430,238~~51,920,115 shares of common stock outstanding. All outstanding shares are freely tradable, unless such shares are held by “affiliates,” as that term is defined in Rule 144 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”).

In addition, we have filed a registration statement on Form S-8 to register all shares subject to options outstanding or reserved for future issuance under our equity compensation plans. If these additional shares are sold, or if it is perceived that they will be sold, in the public market, the trading price of our common stock could decline.

If securities analysts do not publish research or reports about our business, or if they downgrade our stock, the price of our stock could decline.

The trading market for our common stock could be influenced by any research and reports that securities or industry analysts publish about us or our business. Securities analysts have only recently commenced research coverage of our company. In the event securities analysts who cover our company downgrade our stock or publish inaccurate or unfavorable research about our business, our stock price would likely decline. If one or more of these analysts cease coverage of our company or fail to publish reports on us regularly, demand for our stock could decrease, which could cause our stock price and trading volume to decline.

The concentration of ownership among our existing directors, executive officers and principal stockholders provides them, collectively, with substantial control over us, which could limit your ability to influence the outcome of key transactions, including a change of control.

Our directors, executive officers and each of our stockholders who own greater than 5% of our outstanding common stock and their affiliates, in the aggregate, own a substantial majority of the outstanding shares of our common stock. As a result, these stockholders, if acting together, are able to influence or control matters requiring approval by our stockholders, including the election of directors and the approval of mergers, acquisitions or other extraordinary transactions. They may also have interests that differ from yours and may vote in a way with which you disagree and which may be adverse to your interests. This concentration of ownership may have the effect of delaying, preventing or deterring a change of control of our company, could deprive our stockholders of an opportunity to receive a premium for their common stock as part of a sale of our company and might ultimately affect the market price of our common stock.

The requirements of being a public company may strain our resources, divert management’s attention and affect our ability to attract and retain executive management and qualified board members.

As a public company, we are subject to the reporting requirements of the Exchange Act, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, the Dodd-Frank Act, the listing requirements of the New York Stock Exchange (the “NYSE”) and other applicable securities rules and regulations. Compliance with these rules and regulations will increase our legal and financial compliance costs, make some activities more difficult, time-consuming or costly and increase demand on our systems and resources, particularly after we are no longer an “emerging growth company,” as defined in the JOBS Act. The Exchange Act requires, among other things, that we file annual, quarterly and current reports with respect to our business and operating results. The Sarbanes-Oxley Act requires, among other things, that we maintain effective disclosure controls and procedures and internal control over financial reporting. In order to maintain and, if required, improve our disclosure controls and procedures and internal control over financial reporting to meet this standard, significant resources and management oversight may be required. As a result, management’s attention may be diverted from other business concerns, which could adversely affect our business and operating results. Although we have already hired additional employees to comply with these requirements, we may need to hire more employees in the future or engage outside consultants, which will increase our costs and expenses.

In addition, changing laws, regulations and standards relating to corporate governance and public disclosure are creating uncertainty for public companies, increasing legal and financial compliance costs and making some activities more time consuming. These laws, regulations and standards are subject to varying interpretations, in many cases due to their lack of specificity, and, as a result, their application in practice may evolve over time as new guidance is provided by regulatory and governing bodies. This could result in continuing uncertainty regarding compliance matters and higher costs necessitated by ongoing revisions to disclosure and governance practices. We intend to invest resources to

comply with evolving laws, regulations and standards, and this investment may result in increased general and administrative expenses and a diversion of management’s time and attention from revenue-generating activities to compliance activities. If our efforts to comply with new laws, regulations and standards differ from the activities intended by regulatory or governing bodies due to ambiguities related to their application and practice, regulatory authorities may initiate legal proceedings against us, and our business may be adversely affected.

However, for as long as we remain an “emerging growth company,” we may take advantage of certain exemptions from various reporting requirements that are applicable to public companies that are not “emerging growth companies” including, but not limited to, not being required to comply with the auditor attestation requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, reduced disclosure obligations regarding executive compensation in our periodic reports and proxy statements, and exemptions from the requirements of holding a nonbinding advisory vote on executive compensation and shareholder approval of any golden parachute payments not previously approved. We may take advantage of these reporting exemptions until we are no longer an “emerging growth company.”

We will cease to be an “emerging growth company” upon the earliest of: (i) the end of our fiscal year 2019, (ii) the beginning of our first fiscal year after our annual gross revenues are $1.0 billion or more, (iii) the date on which we have, during the previous three-year period, issued more than $1.0 billion in non-convertible debt securities or (iv) as of the end of any fiscal year in which the market value of our common stock held by non-affiliates exceeded $700 million as of the end of the second quarter of that fiscal year.

We also expect that these new rules and regulations will make it more expensive for us to obtain director and officer liability insurance, and we may be required to accept reduced coverage or incur substantially higher costs to obtain coverage. These factors could also make it more difficult for us to attract and retain qualified members of our board of directors, particularly to serve on our audit committee and compensation committee, and qualified executive officers.

As a public company, our business and financial condition ~~has~~have become more visible, which we believe may result in threatened or actual litigation, including by competitors and other third parties. If such claims are successful, our business and operating results could be adversely affected, and even if the claims do not result in litigation or are resolved in our favor, these claims, and the time and resources necessary to resolve them, could divert the resources of our management and adversely affect our business and operating results.

We are an “emerging growth company,” and we cannot be certain if the reduced disclosure requirements applicable to emerging growth companies will make our common stock less attractive to investors.

We are an “emerging growth company,” as defined in the JOBS Act, and we may take advantage of certain exemptions from various reporting requirements that are applicable to public companies that are not “emerging growth companies” including, but not limited to, not being required to comply with the auditor attestation requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, reduced disclosure obligations regarding executive compensation in our periodic reports and proxy statements, and exemptions from the requirements of holding a nonbinding advisory vote on executive compensation and shareholder approval of any golden parachute payments not previously approved. We cannot predict if investors will find our common stock less attractive because we may rely on these exemptions. If some investors find our common stock less attractive as a result, there may be a less active trading market for our common stock, and our stock price may be more volatile.

We anticipate that we will retain all of our future earnings for use in the development of our business and for general corporate purposes. Any determination to pay dividends in the future will be at the discretion of our board of directors. In addition, our existing credit facility restricts and any future indebtedness may restrict our ability to pay dividends. Accordingly, investors must rely on sales of their common stock after price appreciation, which may never occur, as the only way to realize any future gains on their investments. Investors seeking cash dividends should not purchase our common stock.

We have incurred and will continue to incur increased costs as a result of being a public company.

As a public company, we have incurred and will continue to incur significant legal, accounting and other expenses that we did not incur as a private company. In addition, rules implemented by the SEC and the NYSE require certain corporate governance practices by public companies. These rules and regulations increase our legal and financial compliance costs and make some activities more time-consuming and costly. We also incur additional costs associated with our public company reporting requirements. These rules and regulations may also make it more difficult and more expensive for us to obtain director and officer liability insurance, and we may be required to accept reduced policy limits and coverage or incur substantially higher costs to obtain the same or similar coverage. As a result, it may be more difficult for us to attract and retain qualified people to serve on our board of directors or as executive officers.

Provisions in our certificate of incorporation and bylaws and under Delaware law might discourage, delay or prevent a change of control of our company or changes in our management and, therefore, depress the trading price of our common stock.

Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and amended and restated bylaws contain provisions that could depress the trading price of our common stock by acting to discourage, delay or prevent a change of control of our company or changes in our management that the stockholders of our company may deem advantageous. These provisions:

Additionally, we are subject to Section 203 of the Delaware General Corporation Law, which generally prohibits a Delaware corporation from engaging in any of a broad range of business combinations with any “interested” stockholder for a period of three years following the date on which the stockholder became an “interested” stockholder and which may discourage, delay or prevent a change of control of our company.

The provisions of our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and amended and restated bylaws may frustrate or prevent attempts by our stockholders to replace or remove our current management by making it more difficult for stockholders to replace members of our board of directors, which is responsible for appointing the members of our management. The provisions of our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and amended and restated bylaws or Delaware law may also have the effect of delaying or deterring a change in control, which could limit the opportunity for our stockholders to receive a premium for their shares of our common stock, and could also affect the price that some investors are willing to pay for our common stock.

The exhibits listed in the accompanying Exhibit Index are filed or incorporated by reference as part of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.


		Page

	PART I—FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1.	Financial Statements		53
	Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets		53
	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations		64
	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income ~~(Loss)~~(Loss)		75
	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows		86

	Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements		97

Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations		15

Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk		2426

Item 4.	Controls and Procedures		2426

	PART II—OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1.	Legal Proceedings		2628

Item 1A.	Risk Factors		2728

Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds		5549

Item 3.	Defaults Upon Senior Securities		5549

Item 4.	Mine Safety Disclosures		5549

Item 5.	Other Information		5549

Item 6.	Exhibits		5549


Level 1:		Inputs are unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.

Level 2:		Inputs are quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets or inputs that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly through market corroboration, for substantially the full term of the financial instrument.

Level 3:		Inputs are unobservable inputs based on our assumptions.


Cash	$	1,355
Net other tangible assets		290
Developed technology		2,990
Customer relationships		1,340
Trade name		30
Goodwill		5,376
Deferred revenue		(1,015	)
Deferred tax liability		(736	)

Total value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed	$	9,630


	BARRACUDA NETWORKS, INC.

Date: ~~July 11,~~October 10, 2014	By:	/s/ William D. Jenkins, Jr.
		William D. Jenkins, Jr.
		Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)

Date: ~~July 11,~~October 10, 2014	By:	/s/ David Faugno
		David Faugno
		Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)


Exhibit Number		Description

31.1*		Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act

31.2*		Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act

32.1*		Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act

32.2*		Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act

101.INS**		XBRL Instance Document

101.SCH**		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document

101.CAL**		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document

101.DEF**		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document

101.LAB**		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document

101.PRE**		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document

Large accelerated filer

Accelerated filer

Non-accelerated filer

x (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Smaller reporting company