(Former name, former address and formal fiscal year, if changed since last report)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No x

The number of shares of the registrant’s Common Stock, $0.001 par value, outstanding as of ~~July~~October 29, 2014 was ~~17,715,958~~18,928,422.


	June 30, 2014			December 31, 2013
							September 30, 2014			December 31, 2013
ASSETS
Real estate, at cost	$	684,001		$	642,353		$	700,574		$	642,353
Less: accumulated depreciation		88,520			81,241			93,401			81,241

Total real estate, net		595,481			561,112			607,173			561,112

Lease intangibles, net		92,129			79,632			94,642			79,632
Mortgage note receivable								5,600			—
Cash and cash equivalents		2,367			8,546			5,237			8,546
Restricted cash		3,116			5,051			3,541			5,051
Funds held in escrow		12,811			8,653			13,377			8,653
Deferred rent receivable, net		20,590			18,905			21,387			18,905
Deferred financing costs, net		6,678			6,840			6,342			6,840
Other assets		2,358			1,786			2,108			1,786


TOTAL ASSETS	$	735,530		$	690,525		$	759,407		$	690,525


LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

LIABILITIES
Mortgage notes payable	$	456,237		$	422,602		$	460,358		$	422,602
Borrowings under line of credit		25,650			24,400			45,600			24,400
Series C mandatorily redeemable preferred stock, par value $0.001 per share; $25 per share liquidation preference; 1,700,000 shares authorized; and 1,540,000 shares issued and outstanding at June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively		38,500			38,500
Series C mandatorily redeemable preferred stock, par value $0.001 per share; $25 per share liquidation preference; 1,700,000 shares authorized; and 1,540,000 shares issued and outstanding at September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively								38,500			38,500
Deferred rent liability, net		5,703			6,015			5,861			6,015
Asset retirement obligation		3,747			3,884			3,950			3,884
Accounts payable and accrued expenses		6,498			2,359			7,267			2,359
Due to Adviser and Administrator⁽¹⁾		1,737			1,360			1,688			1,360
Other liabilities		6,908			8,259			6,987			8,259


Total Liabilities	$	544,980		$	507,379		$	570,211		$	507,379


Commitments and contingencies⁽²⁾

STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Series A and B redeemable preferred stock, par value $0.001 per share; $25 per share liquidation preference; 2,300,000 shares authorized and 2,150,000 shares issued and outstanding at June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively	$	2		$	2
Senior common stock, par value $0.001 per share; 7,500,000 shares authorized and 441,774 and 374,484 shares issued and outstanding at June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively		—			—
Common stock, par value $0.001 per share, 38,500,000 shares authorized and 17,715,958 and 15,662,414 shares issued and outstanding at June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively		18			16
Series A and B redeemable preferred stock, par value $0.001 per share; $25 per share liquidation preference; 2,300,000 shares authorized and 2,150,000 shares issued and outstanding at September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively							$	2		$	2
Senior common stock, par value $0.001 per share; 7,500,000 shares authorized and 659,537 and 374,484 shares issued and outstanding at September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively								1			—
Common stock, par value $0.001 per share, 38,500,000 shares authorized and 17,907,652 and 15,662,414 shares issued and outstanding at September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively								18			16
Additional paid in capital		332,850			298,751			339,083			298,751
Notes receivable - employee		(375	)		(375	)
Notes receivable—employee								(375	)		(375	)
Distributions in excess of accumulated earnings		(141,945	)		(115,248	)		(149,533	)		(115,248	)


Total Stockholders’ Equity		190,550			183,146			189,196			183,146


TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY	$	735,530		$	690,525		$	759,407		$	690,525

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.


	For the three months ended June 30,						For the six months ended June 30,						For the three months ended September 30,						For the nine months ended September 30,
	2014			2013			2014			2013			2014			2013			2014			2013
Operating revenues
Rental revenue	$	17,620		$	14,190		$	34,205		$	27,856		$	18,368		$	15,807		$	52,573		$	43,663
Interest income from mortgage note receivable														97			—			97			—
Tenant recovery revenue		770			68			1,321			437			549			383			1,870			819

Total operating revenues		18,390			14,258			35,526			28,293			19,014			16,190			54,540			44,482


Operating expenses
Depreciation and amortization		6,871			5,220			13,591			10,121			7,516			6,253			21,107			16,374
Property operating expenses		1,302			564			2,632			1,300			1,202			864			3,834			2,164
Acquisition related expenses		859			274			970			459			233			163			1,202			622
Base management fee⁽¹⁾		666			451			1,291			804			741			559			2,031			1,363
Incentive fee⁽¹⁾		1,527			933			2,767			1,864			1,538			1,138			4,305			3,001
Administration fee⁽¹⁾		485			367			977			730			260			274			1,238			1,004
General and administrative		490			477			957			866			538			377			1,495			1,243
Impairment charge		—			—			13,958			—			280			—			14,238			—

Total operating expenses before credit to incentive fee		12,200			8,286			37,143			16,144			12,308			9,628			49,450			25,771


Credit to incentive fee⁽¹⁾		(957	)		(917	)		(2,162	)		(1,502	)		(851	)		(989	)		(3,013	)		(2,491	)

Total operating expenses		11,243			7,369			34,981			14,642			11,457			8,639			46,437			23,280


Other income (expense)
Interest expense		(6,509	)		(5,764	)		(12,784	)		(11,425	)		(6,679	)		(6,573	)		(19,463	)		(17,998	)
Distributions attributable to Series C mandatorily redeemable preferred stock		(686	)		(686	)		(1,372	)		(1,372	)		(686	)		(686	)		(2,057	)		(2,057	)
Gain on sale of real estate		1,240			—			1,240			—			—			—			1,240			—
Other income		27			12			74			29			37			17			111			47

Total other expense		(5,928	)		(6,438	)		(12,842	)		(12,768	)		(7,328	)		(7,242	)		(20,169	)		(20,008	)


Net income (loss)		1,219			451			(12,297	)		883			229			309			(12,066	)		1,194


Distributions attributable to Series A and B preferred stock		(1,023	)		(1,023	)		(2,047	)		(2,047	)		(1,023	)		(1,023	)		(3,070	)		(3,070	)
Distributions attributable to senior common stock		(110	)		(69	)		(210	)		(122	)		(137	)		(83	)		(347	)		(204	)

Net income (loss) available (attributable) to common stockholders	$	86		$	(641	)	$	(14,554	)	$	(1,286	)
Net loss attributable to common stockholders													$	(931	)	$	(797	)	$	(15,483	)	$	(2,080	)

Loss per weighted average share of common stock—basic & diluted
Loss from continuing operations (net of dividends attributable to preferred stock)													$	(0.05	)	$	(0.06	)	$	(0.93	)	$	(0.16	)

Earnings (loss) per weighted average share of common stock - basic & diluted
Income (loss) from continuing operations (net of dividends attributable to preferred stock)	$	0.01		$	(0.05	)	$	(0.90	)	$	(0.11	)

Net income (loss) available to common stockholders	$	0.01		$	(0.05	)	$	(0.90	)	$	(0.11	)

Loss attributable to common stockholders													$	(0.05	)	$	(0.06	)	$	(0.93	)	$	(0.16	)

Weighted average shares of common stock outstanding
Basic		16,547,793			12,380,402			16,149,467			11,808,701			17,739,084			14,196,423			16,685,162			12,613,354

Diluted		16,894,973			12,380,402			16,149,467			11,808,701			17,739,084			14,196,423			16,685,162			12,613,354


Earnings per weighted average share of senior common stock	$	0.26		$	0.26		$	0.52		$	0.52		$	0.26		$	0.26		$	0.79		$	0.78

Weighted average shares of senior common stock outstanding - basic		421,312			261,754			404,243			233,633
Weighted average shares of senior common stock outstanding—basic														518,592			313,239			438,196			260,693

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.


	For the six months ended June 30,						For the nine months ended September 30,
	2014			2013			2014			2013
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net (loss) income	$	(12,297	)	$	883		$	(12,066	)	$	1,194
Adjustments to reconcile net (loss) income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization		13,591			10,121			21,107			16,374
Impairment charge		13,958			—			14,238			—
Gain on sale of real estate		(1,240	)		—			(1,240	)		—
Amortization of deferred financing costs		795			817			1,209			1,410
Amortization of deferred rent asset and liability, net		(178	)		(157	)		(266	)		(243	)
Amortization of discount and premium on assumed debt		(114	)		(85	)		(190	)		(128	)
Asset retirement obligation expense		(137	)		64			(96	)		96
Increase in other assets		(372	)		(218	)
(Decrease) increase in other assets								(322	)		242
Increase in deferred rent liability								311			—
Increase in deferred rent receivable		(1,778	)		(1,689	)		(2,808	)		(2,724	)
Decrease in accounts payable, accrued expenses, and amount due Adviser and Administrator		(1,004	)		(1,664	)		(538	)		(1,339	)
Increase (decrease) in other liabilities		585			(139	)
Decrease in other liabilities								238			1,698
Leasing commissions paid		(765	)		(394	)		(898	)		(1,008	)

Net cash provided by operating activities		11,044			7,539			18,679			15,572


Cash flows from investing activities:
Acquisition of real estate and related intangible assets		(64,764	)		(33,488	)		(83,564	)		(104,806	)
Improvements of existing real estate		(2,934	)		(3,999	)		(5,416	)		(5,355	)
Proceeds from sale of real estate		11,162			—			11,162			—
Issuance of mortgage note receivable								(5,600	)		—
Receipts from lenders for funds held in escrow		1,287			1,529			1,670			5,764
Payments to lenders for funds held in escrow		(5,445	)		(1,645	)		(6,394	)		(7,159	)
Receipts from tenants for reserves		1,519			2,261			2,484			5,657
Payments to tenants from reserves		(3,423	)		(1,158	)		(3,892	)		(2,167	)
Decrease (increase) in restricted cash		1,935			(1,103	)		1,510			(3,472	)
Deposits on future acquisitions		(1,500	)		(725	)		(2,000	)		(2,125	)
Deposits applied against real estate investments		1,300			—			2,000			2,675

Net cash used in investing activities		(60,863	)		(38,328	)		(88,040	)		(110,988	)


Cash flows from financing activities:
Proceeds from issuance of equity		36,042			57,219			42,636			62,139
Offering costs		(2,028	)		(3,183	)		(2,443	)		(3,533	)
Borrowings under mortgage notes payable		27,535			3,700			33,635			56,108
Payments for deferred financing costs		(633	)		(209	)		(711	)		(1,484	)
Principal repayments on mortgage notes payable		(4,182	)		(3,560	)		(6,085	)		(5,403	)
Principal repayments on employee notes receivable		—			35			—			35
Borrowings from line of credit		44,250			23,700			67,250			58,900
Repayments on line of credit		(43,000	)		(37,500	)		(46,050	)		(55,000	)
Decrease in security deposits		(31	)		—			(103	)		(18	)
Distributions paid for common, senior common and preferred stock		(14,313	)		(10,936	)		(22,077	)		(17,343	)

Net cash provided by financing activities		43,640			29,266			66,052			94,401


Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents		(6,179	)		(1,523	)		(3,309	)		(1,015	)
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period		8,546			5,546			8,546			5,546

Cash and cash equivalents, end of period	$	2,367		$	4,023		$	5,237		$	4,531

NON-CASH INVESTING AND FINANCING INFORMATION
Increase in asset retirement obligation							$	162		$	—

NON-CASH OPERATING, INVESTING AND FINANCING INFORMATION
Fixed rate principal debt assumed in connection with acquisitions	$	10,147		$	—		$	10,147		$	—

Senior common dividend issued in the dividend reinvestment program	$	87		$	52		$	142		$	85

Capital improvements included in accounts payable and accrued expenses	$	5,521		$	—		$	5,774		$	—

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

Gladstone Commercial Corporation is a real estate investment trust, or REIT, that was incorporated under the General Corporation Laws of the State of Maryland on February 14, 2003 primarily for the purpose of investing in and owning net leased industrial, commercial and retail real property and selectively making long-term industrial and commercial mortgage loans. Subject to certain restrictions and limitations, our business is managed by Gladstone Management Corporation, a Delaware corporation, or the Adviser, and administrative services are provided by Gladstone Administration, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, or the Administrator, each pursuant to a contractual arrangement with us. Our Adviser and Administrator collectively employ all of our personnel and pay their salaries, benefits, and general expenses directly.

All further references herein to “we,” “our,” “us” and the “Company” mean Gladstone Commercial Corporation and its consolidated subsidiaries, except where it is made clear that the term means only Gladstone Commercial Corporation.

We conduct substantially all of our operations through a subsidiary, Gladstone Commercial Limited Partnership, a Delaware limited partnership, or the Operating Partnership. As we currently own all of the general and limited partnership interests of the Operating Partnership through two of our subsidiaries, GCLP Business Trust I and II, the financial position and results of operations of the Operating Partnership are consolidated with those of the Company.

Gladstone Commercial Lending, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, or Gladstone Commercial Lending, a subsidiary of ours, was created to conduct all operations related to real estate mortgage loans of the Company. As the Operating Partnership currently owns all of the membership interests of Gladstone Commercial Lending, the financial position and results of operations of Gladstone Commercial Lending are consolidated with ours.

Gladstone Commercial Advisers, Inc., a Delaware corporation, or Commercial Advisers, and a wholly-owned subsidiary of ours, is a taxable REIT subsidiary, or TRS, which was created to collect any non-qualifying income related to our real estate portfolio. There has been no such income earned to date. Since we own 100% of the voting securities of Commercial Advisers, the financial position and results of operations of Commercial Advisers are consolidated with ours.

GCLP Business Trust I and GCLP Business Trust II, each a subsidiary and business trust of ours, were formed under the laws of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts on December 28, 2005. We transferred our 99% limited partnership interest in the Operating Partnership to GCLP Business Trust I in exchange for 100 shares of the trust. Gladstone Commercial Partners, LLC transferred its 1% general partnership interest in the Operating Partnership to GCLP Business Trust II in exchange for 100 trust shares.

Our interim financial statements are prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, or GAAP, for interim financial information and pursuant to the requirements for reporting on Form 10-Q and in accordance with Article 10 of RegulationS-X. Accordingly, certain disclosures

accompanying annual financial statements prepared in accordance with GAAP are omitted. The year-end balance sheet data presented herein was derived from audited financial statements, but does not include all disclosures required by GAAP. In the opinion of our management, all adjustments, consisting solely of normal recurring accruals, necessary for the fair presentation of financial statements for the interim period, have been included. The interim financial statements and notes thereto should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and notes thereto included in our Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013, as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on February 18, 2014. The results of operations for the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2014 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for other interim periods or for the full fiscal year.

During the three months ended September 30, 2014, we recorded an adjustment to our impairment charge and to deferred rent receivable that were related to the impairment of our Roseville, Minnesota property in March 2014. As a result of the correction of these errors, we understated net income by $0.3 million for the three months ended September 30, 2014, there was no impact to the net income for the nine months ended September 30, 2014. We concluded that these adjustments were not material to the results of operations for any interim period presented.

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. Actual results could materially differ from those estimates.

We record investments in real estate at cost and capitalize improvements and replacements when they extend the useful life or improve the efficiency of the asset. We expense costs of repairs and maintenance as such costs are incurred. We compute depreciation using the straight-line method over the estimated useful life, or 39 years, for buildings and improvements, 5 to 20 years for equipment and fixtures, and the shorter of the useful life or the remaining lease term for tenant improvements and leasehold interests.

Certain of our acquisitions involve sale-leaseback transactions with newly-originated leases, which we account for as asset acquisitions under Accounting Standards Codification, or ASC, 805, “Business Combinations.” In the case of an asset acquisition, we will capitalize the transaction costs incurred in connection with the acquisition. Other of our acquisitions involve the acquisition of properties that are already being operated as rental properties, which we will generally consider to be a business combination under ASC 805. Business combination guidance is generally applicable to us when properties are acquired with leases in place at the time of acquisition. When an acquisition is considered a business combination, ASC 805 requires that the purchase price of real estate be allocated to the acquired tangible assets and liabilities, consisting of land, building, tenant improvements, long-term debt assumed and identified intangible assets and liabilities, typically the value of above-market and below-market leases, the value of in-place leases, the value of unamortized lease origination costs and the value of tenant relationships, based in each case on their fair values. ASC 805 also requires that all expenses related to an acquisition accounted for as a business combination to be expensed as incurred, rather than capitalized into the cost of the acquisition.

Management’s estimates of fair value are made using methods similar to those used by independent appraisers (e.g. discounted cash flow analysis). Factors considered by management in its analysis include an estimate of carrying costs during hypothetical expected lease-up periods considering current market conditions and costs to execute similar leases. We also consider information obtained about each property as a result of our pre-acquisition due diligence, marketing and leasing activities in estimating the fair value of the tangible and intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed. In estimating carrying costs, management also includes lost reimbursement of real estate taxes, insurance and other operating expenses

as well as estimates of lost rentals at market rates during the hypothetical expected lease-up periods, which primarily range from 9 to 18 months, depending on specific local market conditions. Management also estimates costs to execute similar leases, including leasing commissions, legal and other related expenses to the extent that such costs are not already incurred in connection with a new lease origination as part of the transaction.

We allocate purchase price to the fair value of the tangible assets of an acquired property by valuing the property as if it were vacant. The “as-if-vacant” value is allocated to land, building and tenant improvements based on management’s determination of the relative fair values of these assets. Real estate

depreciation expense on these tangible assets was ~~$4.6~~$4.8 million and ~~$9.0~~$13.8 million for the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2014, respectively, and ~~$3.6~~$4.2 million and ~~$7.0~~$11.2 million for the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2013, respectively.

Above-market and below-market in-place lease fair values for owned properties are recorded based on the present value (using an interest rate which reflects the risks associated with the leases acquired) of the difference between (i) the contractual amounts to be paid pursuant to the in-place leases and (ii) management’s estimate of fair market lease rates for the corresponding in-place leases, measured over a period equal to the remaining non-cancelable term of the lease. When determining the non-cancelable term of the lease, we evaluate if fixed-rate renewal options, if any, should be included. The capitalized above-market lease values, included in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets as part of deferred rent receivable, are amortized as a reduction of rental income over the remaining non-cancelable terms of the respective leases. Total amortization related to above-market lease values was $0.1 million and $0.2 million for both the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively. The capitalized below-market lease values, included in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets as part of deferred rent liability, are amortized as an increase to rental income over the remaining non-cancelable terms of the respective leases, including any below market renewal periods. Total amortization related to below-market lease values was $0.2 million and ~~$0.3~~$0.5 million for the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2014, respectively, and ~~$0.1~~$0.2 million and ~~$0.3~~$0.4 million for the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2013, respectively.

The total amount of the remaining intangible assets acquired, which consists of in-place lease values, unamortized lease origination costs, and customer relationship intangible values, are allocated based on management’s evaluation of the specific characteristics of each tenant’s lease and our overall relationship with that respective tenant. Characteristics to be considered by management in determining these values include the nature and extent of our existing business relationships with the tenant, growth prospects for developing new business with the tenant, the tenant’s credit quality and our expectations of lease renewals (including those existing under the terms of the lease agreement), among other factors.

The value of in-place leases and lease origination costs are amortized to expense over the remaining term of the respective leases, which generally range from 10 to 15 years. The value of customer relationship intangibles, which is the benefit to us resulting from the likelihood of an existing tenant renewing its lease, are amortized to expense over the remaining term and any anticipated renewal periods in the respective leases, but in no event does the amortization period for intangible assets exceed the remaining depreciable life of the building. Should a tenant terminate its lease, the unamortized portion of the above-market and below-market lease values would be charged to rental income and the unamortized portion of in-place lease values, lease origination costs and customer relationship intangibles will be immediately charged to amortization expense. Total amortization expense related to these intangible assets and liabilities was ~~$2.3~~$2.6 million and ~~$4.7~~$7.2 million for the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2014, respectively, and ~~$1.6~~$2.0 million and ~~$3.1~~$5.2 million for the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2013, respectively.

We account for the impairment of real estate, including intangible assets, in accordance with ASC 360-10-35, “Property, Plant, and Equipment,” which requires us to periodically review the carrying value of each property to determine if circumstances indicate impairment of the carrying value of the investment exists or that depreciation periods should be modified. If circumstances indicate the possibility of impairment, we

prepare a projection of the undiscounted future cash flows, without interest charges, of the specific property and determine if the carrying value of the investment in such property is recoverable. In performing the analysis, we consider such factors as each tenant’s payment history and financial condition, the likelihood of lease renewal, business conditions in the industry in which the tenants operate, whether there are indications that the fair value of the real estate has decreased and our intended holding period of the property. If the carrying amount is more than the aggregate undiscounted future cash flows, we would recognize an impairment loss to the extent the carrying amount exceeds the estimated fair value, less cost to sell, of the property. We evaluate our entire portfolio of properties each quarter for any impairment indicators and perform an impairment analysis on those select properties that have an indication of impairment.

Deferred financing costs consist of costs incurred to obtain financing, including legal fees, origination fees and administrative fees. The costs are deferred and amortized using the straight-line method, which approximates the effective interest method, over the term of the secured financing. We made payments of ~~$0.3~~$0.1 million and ~~$0.6~~$0.7 million for deferred financing costs during the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2014, respectively, and payments of ~~$0.1~~$1.3 million and ~~$0.2~~$1.5 million during the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2013, respectively. Total amortization expense related to deferred financing costs is included in interest expense and was $0.4 million and ~~$0.8~~$1.2 million for ~~both~~ the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2014, respectively, and $0.6 million and $1.4 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013, respectively.

Rental revenue includes rents that each tenant pays in accordance with the terms of its respective lease reported evenly over the non-cancelable term of the lease. Most of our leases contain rental increases at specified intervals. We recognize such revenues on a straight-line basis. Deferred rent receivable in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet includes the cumulative difference between rental revenue, as recorded on a straight-line basis, and rents received from the tenants in accordance with the lease terms, along with the capitalized above-market in-place lease values of certain acquired properties. Accordingly, we determine, in our judgment, to what extent the deferred rent receivable applicable to each specific tenant is collectable. We review deferred rent receivable, as it relates to straight line rents, on a quarterly basis and take into consideration the tenant’s payment history, the financial condition of the tenant, business conditions in the industry in which the tenant operates and economic conditions in the geographic area in which the property is located. In the event that the collectability of deferred rent with respect to any given tenant is in doubt, we record an allowance for uncollectable accounts or record a direct write-off of the specific rent receivable. No such reserves or direct write-offs have been recorded to date.

Management considers its loans and other lending investments to be held-for-investment. We reflect our loans classified as long-term investments at amortized cost, less allowance for loan losses, acquisition premiums or discounts, and deferred loan fees. On occasion, we may acquire loans at small premiums or discounts based on the credit characteristics of such loans. These premiums or discounts would be recognized as yield adjustments over the lives of the related loans. Loan origination fees, as well as direct loan origination costs, are also deferred and recognized over the lives of the related loans as yield adjustments. If loans with premiums, discounts, or loan origination fees are prepaid, we would immediately recognize the unamortized portion as a decrease or increase in the prepayment gain or loss. Interest income is recognized using the effective interest method applied on a loan-by-loan basis. Prepayment penalties or yield maintenance payments from borrowers are recognized as additional income when received.

Tenant recovery revenue includes payments from tenants as reimbursements for franchise taxes, management fees, insurance, and ground lease payments. We recognize tenant recovery revenue in the same periods that we incur the related expenses.

ASC 410, “Asset Retirement and Environmental Obligation,” requires an entity to recognize a liability for a conditional asset retirement obligation when incurred if the liability can be reasonably estimated. ASC 410-20-20 clarifies that the term “Conditional Asset Retirement Obligation” refers to a legal obligation (pursuant to existing laws or by contract) to perform an asset retirement activity in which the timing and/or method of settlement are conditional on a future event that may or may not be within the control of the entity. ASC 410-20-25-6 clarifies when an entity would have sufficient information to reasonably estimate the fair value of an asset retirement obligation. We have accrued a liability and corresponding increase to the cost of the related properties for disposal related to all properties constructed prior to 1985 that have, or may have, asbestos present in the building. The liabilities are accreted over the life of the leases for the respective properties. We accrued $0.2 million in liabilities in connection with acquisitions during the nine months ended September 30, 2014. There were no liabilities accrued during the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, ~~2014 and 2013, respectively.~~2013. We recorded expenses of $0.04 million and ~~$0.07~~$0.1 million during the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2014, respectively, and $0.03 million and ~~$0.06~~$0.1 million during the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2013, respectively, to general and administrative expense. Costs of future expenditures for obligations are discounted to their present value. The aggregate undiscounted obligation on all properties is ~~$9.2~~$9.5 million and the discount rates used in the calculations range from 2.5% to 7.6%. We do not expect to make any payments in conjunction with these obligations in each of the next five years.

For the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2014 and 2013, comprehensive ~~loss~~income (loss) equaled net ~~loss;~~income (loss); therefore, a separate statement of comprehensive ~~loss~~income (loss) is not included in the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements.

The Financial Accounting Standards Board, or FASB, issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-08, “Presentation of Financial Statements (Topic 205) and Property, Plant, and Equipment (Topic 360): Reporting Discontinued Operations and Disclosures of Disposals of Components of an Entity.” Under this revised guidance, only disposals representing a strategic shift in operations, such as a disposal of a major geographic area, a major line of business or a major equity method investment, will be presented as discontinued operations. This standard is effective for our fiscal year beginning January 1, 2015; however, the FASB has permitted early adoption beginning with the first quarter of 2014. We adopted this standard as of March 31, 2014. We anticipate the adoption will result in most disposals not qualifying for discontinued operations presentation.

In May 2014, the ~~Financial Accounting Standards Board, or~~ FASB issued ~~Accounting Standards,~~a new accounting standard, or ASC, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (ASC 606).” The revenue standard contains principles that an entity will apply to determine the measurement of revenue and timing of when it is recognized. This standard is effective for our fiscal year beginning January 1, 2017 and we are currently evaluating any impact from adoption.

We are externally managed pursuant to contractual arrangements with our Adviser and our Administrator which collectively employ all of our personnel and pay their salaries, benefits, and general expenses directly. Both our Adviser and Administrator are affiliates of ours as their parent company is controlled by Mr. David Gladstone, our chairman and chief executive officer. We have an advisory agreement with our Adviser, or the Advisory Agreement, and an administration agreement with our Administrator, or the Administration Agreement. The management and administrative services and fees under the Advisory and Administration Agreements are described below. At ~~June~~September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, $1.7 million and $1.4 million, respectively, was collectively due to our Adviser and Administrator.

The Advisory Agreement provides for an annual base management fee equal to 2% of our total stockholders’ equity, less the recorded value of any preferred stock and adjusted to exclude the effect of any unrealized gains, losses or other items that do not affect realized net income (including impairment charges), or common stockholders’ equity, and an incentive fee based on funds from operations, or FFO. For the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2014, we recorded a base management fee of $0.7 million and ~~$1.3~~$2.0 million, respectively, and for the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2013, we recorded a base management fee of ~~$0.5~~$0.6 million and ~~$0.8~~$1.4 million, respectively.

For purposes of calculating the incentive fee, FFO includes any realized capital gains and capital losses, less any distributions paid on preferred stock and senior common stock, but FFO does not include any unrealized capital gains or losses (including impairment charges). The incentive fee rewards the Adviser if our quarterly FFO, before giving effect to any incentive fee, or pre-incentive fee FFO, exceeds 1.75%, or 7% annualized, or the hurdle rate, of total common stockholders’ equity. The Adviser receives 100% of the amount of the pre-incentive fee FFO that exceeds the hurdle rate, but is less than 2.1875% of our common stockholders’ equity. The Adviser also receives an incentive fee of 20% of the amount of our pre-incentive fee FFO that exceeds 2.1875% of common stockholders’ equity.

For the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2014, we recorded an incentive fee of $1.5 million and ~~$2.8~~$4.3 million, respectively, offset by credits related to unconditional, voluntary and irrevocable waivers issued by the Adviser of $0.8 million and $3.0 million, respectively, resulting in a net incentive fee for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014, of $0.7 million and $1.3 million, respectively. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013, we recorded an incentive fee of $1.1 million and $3.0 million, respectively, offset by credits related to unconditional, voluntary and irrevocable waivers issued by the Adviser of $1.0 million and ~~$2.2~~$2.5 million, respectively, resulting in a net incentive fee for the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June 30, 2014, of $0.5 million and $0.6 million, respectively. For the three and six~~

months ended June 30, 2013, we recorded an incentive fee of $0.9 million and $1.9 million, respectively, offset by credits related to unconditional, voluntary and irrevocable waivers issued by the Adviser of $0.9 million and $1.5 million, respectively, resulting in a net incentive fee for the three and six months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2013, of ~~$0.0~~$0.1 million and ~~$0.4~~$0.5 million, respectively. Our Board of Directors accepted the Adviser’s offer to waive, on a quarterly basis, a portion of the incentive fee for the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2014 and 2013, to support the current level of distributions to all classes of our stockholders. This waiver may not be recouped by the Adviser in the future.

Pursuant to the Administration Agreement, we pay for our allocable portion of the Administrator’s ~~overhead~~ expenses in performing ~~its obligations~~services to us, including, but not limited to, rent and the salaries and benefits of its personnel, including our chief financial officer and treasurer, chief compliance officer, general counsel and secretary ~~and their respective staffs. Our general counsel and secretary~~(who also serves as our Administrator’s ~~president. Our~~president), and their respective staffs. Prior to July 1, 2014, our allocable portion ~~of expenses is~~was derived by multiplying that portion of the Administrator’s ~~total~~expenses allocable ~~expenses~~to allfunds managed by the Adviser by the percentage of our total assets at the beginning of each quarter in comparison to the total assets of all ~~companies~~funds managed by the ~~Adviser~~Adviser. As approved by our Board of Directors, effective July 1, 2014, our allocable portion of the Administrator’s expenses will be derived by multiplying our Administrator’s total expenses by the approximate percentage of time the Administrator’s employees perform services for us in relation to their time spent performing services for allcompanies serviced by our Administrator under ~~similar~~contractual agreements. For the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2014, we recorded an administration fee of ~~$0.5~~$0.3 million and ~~$1.0~~$1.2 million, respectively, and for the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2013, we recorded an administration fee of ~~$0.4~~$0.3 million and ~~$0.7~~$1.0 million, respectively.

Gladstone Securities, LLC, or Gladstone Securities, is a privately held broker dealer registered with The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority and insured by the Securities Investor Protection Corporation. Gladstone Securities is an affiliate of ours, as its parent company is controlled by Mr. David Gladstone, our chairman and chief executive officer. Mr. Gladstone also serves on the board of managers of Gladstone Securities.

In connection with the offering of our senior common stock (see Note 9,10, “Stockholders’ Equity,” for further details) we entered into a Dealer Manager Agreement, dated March 25, 2011, or the Dealer Manager Agreement, with Gladstone Securities pursuant to which Gladstone Securities agreed to act as our exclusive dealer manager in connection with the offering. Pursuant to the terms of the Dealer Manager Agreement, Gladstone Securities is entitled to receive a sales commission in the amount of 7.0% of the gross proceeds of the shares of senior common stock sold, plus a dealer manager fee in the amount of 3.0% of the gross proceeds of the shares of senior common stock sold. Gladstone Securities, in its sole and absolute discretion, may re-allocate all of its selling commissions attributable to a participating broker-dealer and may also re-allocate a portion of its dealer manager fee earned in respect of the proceeds generated by the participating broker-dealer to any participating broker-dealer as a non-accountable marketing allowance. In addition, we have agreed to indemnify Gladstone Securities against various liabilities, including certain liabilities arising under the federal securities laws. We made approximately ~~$0.05~~$0.3 million and ~~$0.1~~$0.4 million of payments during the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2014 respectively, and we made approximately ~~$0.1~~$0.05 million and $0.2 million of payments during the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2013, respectively, to Gladstone Securities pursuant to this agreement, which are reflected as a component of senior common stock costs in the statement of stockholders’ equity. The Dealer Manager Agreement currently is scheduled to terminate on the earlier of (i) March 28, 2015 or (ii) the date on which 3,000,000 shares of senior common stock are sold pursuant to the Dealer Manager Agreement.

We also entered into an agreement with Gladstone Securities, effective June 18, 2013, for it to act as our non-exclusive agent to assist us with arranging mortgage financing for properties we own. In connection with this engagement, Gladstone Securities may from time to time solicit the interest of various commercial real estate lenders or recommend to us third party lenders offering credit products or packages that are

responsive to our needs. We pay Gladstone Securities a financing fee in connection with the services it provides to us for securing mortgage financing on any of our properties. The amount of these financing fees, which are payable upon closing of the financing, are based on a percentage of the amount of the mortgage, generally ranging from 0.5% to a maximum of 1.0% of the mortgage obtained. The amount of the financing fees may be reduced or eliminated, as determined by us and Gladstone Securities, after taking into consideration various factors, including, but not limited to, the involvement of any third party brokers and market conditions. We paid financing fees to Gladstone Securities of ~~$0.07~~$0.02 million and $0.1 million during the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, ~~2014.~~2014, respectively. We ~~did not pay any~~paid financing fees to Gladstone Securities of $0.04 million during both the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2013. The agreement ~~which was scheduled to terminate on August 31, 2014, was renewed for another year at the approval of our Board of Directors. It~~ is ~~now~~ scheduled to terminate on August 31, 2015, unless renewed or earlier terminated.

The following tables set forth the computation of basic and diluted ~~earnings (loss)~~loss per share of common stock for the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively. We computed basic ~~earnings (loss)~~loss per share for the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively, using the weighted average number of shares outstanding during the periods. Diluted ~~earnings (loss)~~loss per share for the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2014 and 2013, reflects additional shares of common stock, related to our convertible senior common stock, that would have been outstanding if dilutive potential shares of common stock had been issued, as well as an adjustment to net income available to common stockholders as applicable to common stockholders that would result from their assumed ~~issuance(dollars~~issuance (dollars in thousands, except per share amounts).

The following table sets forth the components of our investments in real estate as of ~~June~~September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013 (dollars in thousands):


	September 30, 2014			December 31, 2013
Real estate:
Land	$	86,737		$	79,153
Building and improvements		573,149			527,230
Tenant improvements		40,688			35,970
Accumulated depreciation		(93,401	)		(81,241	)

Real estate, net	$	607,173		$	561,112

During the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2014, we acquired ~~six~~eight properties, which are summarized in the table below (dollars in thousands):


Location	Acquisition Date		Square Footage		Lease Term	Renewal Options	Total Purchase Price		Acquisition Expenses		Annualized Straight Line Rent		Debt Issued & Assumed		Acquisition Date		Square Footage		Lease Term			Renewal Options			Total Purchase Price		Acquisition Expenses		Annualized Straight Line Rent			Debt Issued & Assumed

Allen, TX		3/27/2014		21,154	12 Years	4 (5 years each)	$	5,525	$	29	$	570	$	3,481		3/27/2014		21,154		12 Years			4 (5 years each)		$	5,525	$	33	$	570		$	3,481
Colleyville, TX		3/27/2014		20,355	12 Years	4 (5 years each)		4,523		29		467		2,849		3/27/2014		20,355		12 Years			4 (5 years each)			4,523		33		467			2,849
Rancho Cordova, CA		4/22/2014		61,358	10 Years	1 (5 year)		8,225		65		902		4,935
Rancho Cordova, CA⁽⁴⁾																4/22/2014		61,358		10 Years			1 (5 year)			8,225		73		902			4,935
Coppell, TX		5/8/2014		21,171	12 Years	4 (5 years each)		5,838		22		601		3,816		5/8/2014		21,171		12 Years			4 (5 years each)			5,838		26		601			3,816
Columbus, OH		5/13/2014		114,786	9.5 Years	N/A		11,800		65		1,278		N/A		5/13/2014		114,786		9.5 Years	⁽¹⁾		N/A	⁽¹⁾		11,800		70		1,278	⁽³⁾		N/A
Taylor, PA		6/9/2014		955,935	10 Years	4 (5 years each)		39,000		714		3,400		22,600		6/9/2014		955,935		10 Years			4 (5 years each)			39,000		730		3,400			22,600
Aurora, CO																7/1/2014		124,800		15 Years			2 (5 years each)			8,300		91		768			N/A
Indianapolis, IN⁽⁴⁾																9/3/2014		86,495		11.5 Years	⁽²⁾		2 (5 years each)	⁽²⁾		10,500		58		1,504	⁽³⁾		6,100

Total				1,194,759			$	74,911	$	924	$	7,218	$	37,681				1,406,054							$	93,711	$	1,114	$	9,490		$	43,781

In accordance with ASC 805, we determined the fair value of the acquired assets and liabilities assumed related to the ~~six~~eight properties acquired during the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2014 as follows (in thousands):


	Land		Building		Tenant Improvements		In-place Leases		Leasing Costs		Customer Relationships		Above Market Leases		Below Market Leases			Premium on Assumed Debt			Total Purchase Price
																							Land		Building		Tenant Improvements		In-place Leases		Leasing Costs		Customer Relationships		Above Market Leases		Below Market Leases			Premium on Assumed Debt			Total Purchase Price
Allen, TX	$	874	$	3,509	$	125	$	598	$	273	$	218	$	—	$	—		$	(72	)	$	5,525	$	874	$	3,509	$	125	$	598	$	273	$	218	$	—	$	—		$	(72	)	$	5,525
Colleyville, TX		1,277		2,307		117		486		220		181		—		(6	)		(59	)		4,523		1,277		2,307		117		486		220		181		—		(6	)		(59	)		4,523
Rancho Cordova, CA		752		5,898		278		473		546		278		—		—			—			8,225		752		5,898		278		473		546		278		—		—			—			8,225
Coppell, TX		1,448		3,221		128		636		293		230		—		—			(118	)		5,838		1,448		3,221		128		636		293		230		—		—			(118	)		5,838
Columbus, OH		990		6,080		1,937		823		719		990		261		—			—			11,800		990		6,080		1,937		823		719		990		261		—			—			11,800
Taylor, PA		3,102		24,449		956		6,171		1,452		2,870		—		—			—			39,000		3,102		24,449		956		6,171		1,452		2,870		—		—			—			39,000
Aurora, CO																								2,882		3,825		92		413		806		282		—		—			—			8,300
Indianapolis, IN																								502		5,334		1,088		1,990		741		732		126		(13	)		—			10,500

	$	8,443	$	45,464	$	3,541	$	9,187	$	3,503	$	4,767	$	261	$	(6	)	$	(249	)	$	74,911	$	11,827	$	54,623	$	4,721	$	11,590	$	5,050	$	5,781	$	387	$	(19	)	$	(249	)	$	93,711

Below is a summary of the total revenue and earnings recognized on the ~~six~~eight properties acquired during the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2014 (dollars in thousands):


			For the three months ended June 30,				For the six months ended June 30,						For the three months ended September 30,				For the nine months ended September 30,
			2014				2014				Acquisition		2014				2014
Location	Acquisition Date		Rental Revenue		Earnings ⁽¹⁾		Rental Revenue		Earnings ⁽¹⁾		Date		Rental Revenue		Earnings⁽¹⁾		Rental Revenue		Earnings⁽¹⁾

Allen, TX		3/27/2014	$	142	$	81	$	150	$	86		3/27/2014	$	143	$	101	$	293	$	167
Colleyville, TX		3/27/2014		117		67		123		71		3/27/2014		117		83		240		138
Rancho Cordova, CA		4/22/2014		173		65		173		65		4/22/2014		226		104		399		168
Coppell, TX		5/8/2014		89		52		89		52		5/8/2014		150		116		239		139
Columbus, OH		5/13/2014		167		68		167		68
Columbus, OH⁽²⁾												5/13/2014		311		115		479		184
Taylor, PA		6/9/2014		208		98		208		98		6/9/2014		850		395		1,058		493
Aurora, CO												7/1/2014		192		124		192		124
Indianapolis, IN⁽²⁾												9/3/2014		116		9		116		9

													$	2,105	$	1,047	$	3,016	$	1,422
			$	896	$	431	$	910	$	440

⁽²⁾	Rental revenue and earnings is reflective of aggregate rent and operating expenses among all tenants occupying the building.

The following table reflects pro-forma consolidated statements of operations as if the ~~six~~eight properties acquired during the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2014 were acquired as of the beginning of the previous period. The pro-forma earnings for the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2014 and 2013 were adjusted to assume that acquisition-related costs were incurred as of the beginning of the previous period (dollars in thousands, except per share amounts):


	For the three months ended June 30,						For the six months ended June 30,
	2014			2013			2014			2013			For the three months ended September 30,						For the nine months ended September 30,
	(unaudited)						(unaudited)						2014			2013			2014			2013
													(unaudited)						(unaudited)
Operating Data:
Total operating revenue	$	19,339		$	18,822		$	38,316		$	37,628		$	19,086		$	19,060		$	58,050		$	56,906
Total operating expenses		(10,986	)		(11,090	)		(35,799	)⁽¹⁾		(21,608	)		(11,434	)		(10,538	)		(47,780	)⁽¹⁾		(32,479	)
Other expenses		(6,202	)		(7,566	)		(13,655	)		(15,355	)		(7,283	)		(8,215	)		(21,269	)		(24,347	)

Net income (loss)		2,151			166			(11,138	)		665			369			307			(10,999	)		80
Dividends attributable to preferred and senior common stock		(1,133	)		(1,092	)		(2,257	)		(2,169	)		(1,160	)		(1,106	)		(3,417	)		(3,274	)

Net income (loss) available (attributable) to common stockholders	$	1,018		$	(926	)	$	(13,395	)	$	(1,504	)

Net loss attributable to common stockholders													$	(791	)	$	(799	)	$	(14,416	)	$	(3,194	)

Share and Per Share Data:
Basic and diluted earnings (loss) per share of common stock	$	0.06		$	(0.07	)	$	(0.83	)	$	(0.13	)
Basic and diluted loss per share of common stock													$	(0.04	)	$	(0.06	)	$	(0.86	)	$	(0.25	)
Weighted average shares outstanding-basic		16,547,793			12,380,402			16,149,467			11,808,701			17,739,084			14,196,423			16,685,162			12,613,354
Weighted average shares outstanding-diluted		16,894,973			12,380,402			16,149,467			11,808,701			17,739,084			14,196,423			16,685,162			12,613,354

During the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2013, we acquired ~~three~~five properties and completed an expansion of one property, which are summarized below (dollars in thousands):


Location	Acquisition/ Expansion Date		Square Footage		Lease Term	Renewal Options	Total Purchase/ Expansion Price		Acquistion Expenses		Annualized Straight Line Rent		Debt Issued		Acquisition/ Expansion Date		Square Footage		Lease Term			Renewal Options			Total Purchase/ Expansion Price		Acquistion Expenses		Annualized Straight Line Rent			Debt Issued

Egg Harbor Township, NJ		3/28/2013		29,257	10 years	1 (5 years)	$	5,650	$	152	$	490	$	3,700		3/28/2013		29,257		10 years			1 (5 years)		$	5,650	$	152	$	490		$	3,700

Clintonville, WI⁽¹⁾		4/11/2013		102,400	15 years	N/A		3,250		N/A		961		—		4/11/2013		102,400		15 years			N/A			3,250		N/A		961			—

Vance, AL		5/8/2013		170,000	10 years	2 (5 year options)		13,388		186		1,173		—		5/8/2013		170,000		10 years			2 (5 year options)			13,388		186		1,173			—

Blaine, MN		5/10/2013		92,275	6.9 years	2 (5 year options)		14,450		79		1,475		—		5/10/2013		92,275		6.9 years			2 (5 year options)			14,450		79		1,475			8,200

Austin, TX																7/9/2013		320,000		8 years			3 (3 year options)			57,000		155		4,641			35,300
Allen, TX⁽⁴⁾																7/10/2013		115,200		11.5 years	⁽²⁾		2 (5 year options)	⁽²⁾		15,150		81		1,918	⁽³⁾		8,900

Total				393,932			$	36,738	$	417	$	4,099	$	3,700				829,132							$	108,888	$	653	$	10,658		$	56,100

In accordance with ASC 805, we determined the fair value of acquired assets related to the ~~three~~five properties acquired during the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2013 as follows (in thousands):

Below is a summary of the total revenue and earnings recognized on the ~~three~~five properties acquired during the ~~six~~three and nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2013 (dollars in thousands):


													Rental Revenue				Net Income
Location	Acquisition Date		For the three months ended June 30, 2013				For the six months ended June 30, 2013				Acquisition Date		For the three months ended September 30, 2013		For the nine months ended September 30, 2013		For the three months ended September 30, 2013⁽¹⁾		For the nine months ended September 30, 2013⁽¹⁾
			Rental Revenue		Earnings⁽¹⁾		Rental Revenue		Earnings⁽¹⁾

Egg Harbor Township, NJ		3/28/2013	$	122	$	69	$	128	$	72		3/28/2013	$	122	$	250	$	61	$	130
Vance, AL		5/8/2013		170		70		170		70		5/8/2013		293		464		147		218
Blaine, MN		5/10/2013		210		94		210		94		5/10/2013		369		579		161		256
Austin, TX												7/9/2013		1,098		1,098		297		297
Allen, TX												7/10/2013		325		325		136		136

													$	2,207	$	2,716	$	802	$	1,037
			$	502	$	233	$	508	$	236

Future operating lease payments from tenants under non-cancelable leases, excluding tenant reimbursement of expenses, for the remainder of 2014 and each of the five succeeding fiscal years and thereafter is as follows (dollars in thousands):


Year	Tenant Lease Payments		Tenant Lease Payments
Six Months ending December 31, 2014	$	34,255
Three Months ending December 31, 2014			$	16,929
2015		65,830		68,254
2016		63,228		65,416
2017		62,763		64,689
2018		61,125		64,103
2019		61,469		64,403
Thereafter		274,216		290,868

On April 4, 2014, our tenant occupying our Newburyport, Massachusetts property notified us of their intention not to exercise their renewal option, as the tenant is relocating to Rhode Island. The tenant will continue paying rent and operating expenses through the lease termination date of April 30, 2015.

On May 6, 2014, we extended the lease with the tenant occupying our property located in Austin, Texas. The lease covering this property was extended for an additional eight years, through June 2022. The lease was originally set to expire in June 2015. The lease provides for prescribed rent escalations over the life of the lease, with annualized straight line rents of approximately $0.7 million. In connection with the extension of the lease and modification of certain terms of the lease, we paid $0.2 million in leasing commissions, and will pay a total of approximately $1.3 million in tenant improvements between now and second quarter 2015.

On June 11, 2014, we extended the lease with the tenant occupying our property located in Burnsville, Minnesota. The new lease covers approximately two-thirds of the space and was extended for an additional eight years, through January 2023. The lease was originally set to expire in June 2015. The tenant in this property will continue to pay rent on the entire building through June 2015, and we are working to identify tenants to lease the ~~remainder~~remaining one-third of the building. The new lease provides for prescribed rent escalations over the life of the lease, with annualized straight line rents of $1.0 million. Rental income per square foot increased 14% from the previous lease. The lease grants the tenant two options to extend the lease for an additional 3three years each. In connection with the extension of the lease and the modification of certain terms under the lease, we paid $0.5 million in leasing commissions, and will pay $3.3 million in tenant improvements between now and first quarter 2015.

On July 7, 2014, we extended the lease with one of the tenants occupying our property located in Akron, Ohio. The new lease covers approximately two-thirds of the space and was extended for an additional five years, through March 2020. The lease was originally set to expire in March 2015. This tenant will continue to pay its existing rent through March 2015. The new lease provides for prescribed rent escalations over the life of the lease, with annualized straight line rents of $0.6 million. The lease grants the tenant two options to extend the lease for an additional five years each. In connection with the extension of the lease and the modification of certain terms under the lease, we paid $0.2 million in leasing commissions, and $0.9 million in tenant improvements.

On August 1, 2014, we modified the leases with the tenants occupying our properties located in Austin and San Antonio, Texas. The leases covering these respective properties were adjusted to defer rental payments covering the period September 1, 2014 through November 30, 2014. The tenants are current on their rental payments through the quarter ended September 30, 2014.

On September 25, 2014, we modified the lease with the tenant occupying our property located in Concord Township, Ohio. The lease covering this property was adjusted to defer a portion of rental payments covering the period August 2014 through December 2014. The tenant will repay the deferred rent balance monthly during calendar year 2015. This rental deferral has no impact on the annualized straight line rents recognized on this property. The tenant is current on its rental payments through the quarter ended September 30, 2014.

The following table summarizes the carrying value of intangible assets and the accumulated amortization for each intangible asset class as of September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively (dollars in thousands):


	September 30, 2014					December 31, 2013
	Lease Intangibles		Accumulated Amortization			Lease Intangibles		Accumulated Amortization
In-place leases	$	58,925	$	(18,391	)	$	47,442	$	(15,158	)
Leasing costs		36,969		(11,419	)		31,339		(9,323	)
Customer relationships		40,909		(12,351	)		35,739		(10,407	)

	$	136,803	$	(42,161	)	$	114,520	$	(34,888	)

The weighted average amortization periods in years for the intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed during the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively, were as follows


Intangible Assets & Liabilities	2014			2013		2014		2013
In-place leases		10.7	��		9.3		10.2		8.8
Leasing costs		10.7			9.3		10.2		8.8
Customer relationships		15.6			14.2		14.6		13.5
Above market leases		8.2			—		9.3		8.8
Below market leases		11.9			—		9.9		7.2

All intangible assets & liabilities		12.2			10.9		11.5		9.9

The estimated aggregate amortization expense for the remainder of 2014 and for each of the five succeeding fiscal years and thereafter is as follows (dollars in thousands):


Year	Estimated Amortization Expense		Estimated Amortization Expense
Six Months ending December 31, 2014	$	5,834
Three Months ending December 31, 2014			$	3,049
2015		11,395		11,931
2016		10,732		11,224
2017		10,539		11,018
2018		10,251		10,719
2019		10,243		10,711
Thereafter		33,135		35,990

~~As of March 31,~~On June 6, 2014, we ~~classified~~sold our property located in Sterling Heights, Michigan as held for sale under the provisions of ASC 360-10, which requires that the assets and liabilities of any properties which are held for sale, be presented separately in our condensed consolidated balance sheet in the current period presented. On June 6, 2014, we sold the property to the tenant currently occupying the building for $11.4 million and recognized a gain of $1.2 million on the sale.

The table below summarizes the components of income from real estate and related assets held for sale for the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2014 and ~~June~~September 30, 2013, ~~respectively:~~respectively (dollars in thousands):


	For the three months ended June 30,				For the six months ended June 30,
	2014		2013		2014		2013		For the three months ended September 30,				For the nine months ended September 30,
									2014		2013		2014		2013
Operating revenue	$	215	$	292	$	507	$	583	$	—	$	292	$	507	$	875

Operating expense		1		57		40		114		—		57		40		172


Income from real estate and related assets held for sale	$	214	$	235	$	467	$	469	$	—	$	235	$	467	$	703

We performed the evaluation and analysis of our portfolio and concluded that our Roseville, Minnesota property was impaired as of March 31, 2014. We determined that the expected undiscounted cash flows based upon a revised estimated holding period of this property was below the current carrying value. The estimated holding period was revised after a potential tenant that we were anticipating to lease a large

portion of the vacant space, during the three months ended March 31, 2014, did not execute a lease on the property. Consequently, we revised the holding period to coincide with the maturity of the mortgage loan in June 2014. Accordingly, we reduced the carrying value of this property to its estimated fair value, less cost to sell, and we recognized an impairment loss of ~~$14.0~~$14.2 million during the ~~three~~nine months ended ~~March~~September 30, 2014. This property is in the process of being returned to the lender in a deed in lieu transaction, which is anticipated to occur during the quarter ending December 31, 2014.

We ~~also determined~~had previously reported that our property located in South Hadley, Massachusetts iswas at risk ~~to become~~of becoming impaired in the future. We recently ~~extended~~received notification from the existing tenant that they will extend the lease on the property for ~~one year,~~two years, and it will now ~~expires~~expire in January ~~2015. There is a possibility~~2017. Because of this lease extension, we ~~may have~~are no longer at risk at having to impair this ~~150,000 square foot industrial~~ property in ~~2014 if we do not negotiate another lease extension on this building or find a replacement tenant.~~the next year.

We ~~will~~ continue to monitor our portfolio for any other indicators of impairment.

On July 25, 2014, we closed a $5.6 million second mortgage development loan for the construction of an 81,371 square foot, build-to-suit transitional care facility located on a major hospital campus in Phoenix, Arizona. Construction is scheduled to be completed in July 2015 and we will earn 9.0% interest, paid currently in cash, on the loan during construction and through maturity. Prior to completion of the facility, we will be granted a right of first offer to purchase the property at fair value. If we do not purchase the property we will receive an exit fee when the property is sold and the loan is repaid in an amount sufficient for us to earn an internal rate of return of 22% on the second mortgage development loan. The loan is scheduled to mature in July 2016, but has a one year extension option.

Our mortgage notes payable and line of credit as of ~~June~~September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013 are summarized below (dollars in thousands):


			Carrying Value at								Carrying Value at
	Encumbered properties at June 30, 2014		June 30, 2014		December 31, 2013		Stated Interest Rates at June 30, 2014⁽⁴⁾	Scheduled Maturity Dates at June 30, 2014	Encumbered properties at September 30, 2014		September 30, 2014		December 31, 2013		Stated Interest Rates at September 30, 2014⁽⁴⁾	Scheduled Maturity Dates at September 30, 2014
Mortgage and Other Secured Loans:
Fixed rate mortgage loans		71	$	447,178	$	413,678	(1)	(2)		72	$	451,375	$	413,678	(1)	(2)
Variable rate mortgage loans		4		8,200		8,200	LIBOR+2.15% ⁽³⁾	12/1/2016		4		8,200		8,200	LIBOR + 2.15%⁽³⁾	12/1/2016
Premiums and discounts (net)		N/A		859		724	N/A	N/A		N/A		783		724	N/A	N/A

Total Mortgage Notes Payable		75	$	456,237	$	422,602				76	$	460,358	$	422,602


Variable rate Line of Credit		16		25,650		24,400	LIBOR+3.00%⁽³⁾	8/1/2017		17		45,600		24,400	LIBOR + 2.75%⁽³⁾	8/1/2017

Total Mortgage Notes Payable and Line of Credit		91	$	481,887	$	447,002				93	$	505,958	$	447,002

As of ~~June~~September 30, 2014, we had 4041 mortgage notes payable, which were collateralized by a total of 7576 properties with a net book value of ~~$607.8~~$614.5 million. Gladstone Commercial Corporation has limited recourse liabilities that could result from any one or more of the following circumstances: a borrower voluntarily filing for bankruptcy, improper conveyance of a property, fraud or material misrepresentation, misapplication or misappropriation of rents, security deposits, insurance proceeds or condemnation proceeds, or physical waste or damage to the property resulting from a borrower’s gross negligence or willful misconduct. We will also indemnify lenders against claims resulting from the presence of hazardous substances or activity involving hazardous substances in violation of environmental laws on a property. The weighted-average interest rate on the mortgage notes payable as of ~~June~~September 30, 2014 was ~~5.36%~~5.35%.

During the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2014, we assumed two long-term mortgages, collateralized by three properties, and issued ~~two~~three long-term mortgages, collateralized by ~~two~~three properties, which are summarized below (dollars in thousands):


Date of Issuance	Issuing Bank	Debt Issued		Interest Rate			Maturity Date	Issuing Bank	Debt Issued		Interest Rate			Maturity Date

3/27/2014	Wells Fargo N.A.	$	6,330		5.58	%	2/1/2016	Wells Fargo N.A.	$	6,330		5.58	%		2/1/2016

4/22/2014	Keybank N.A.		4,935		4.90	%	5/1/2024	Keybank N.A.		4,935		4.90	%		5/1/2024

5/8/2014	Wells Fargo N.A.		3,816		6.25	%	6/1/2016	Wells Fargo N.A.		3,816		6.25	%		6/1/2016

6/9/2014	Prudential Mortgage Capital Company		22,600		4.23	%	7/1/2019	Prudential Mortgage Capital Company		22,600		4.23	%		7/1/2019
9/3/2014								Everbank		6,100		4.40	%		10/1/2024

		$	37,681						$	43,781

Scheduled principal payments of mortgage notes payable for the remainder of 2014, and each of the five succeeding fiscal years and thereafter are as follows (dollars in thousands):


Year	Scheduled Principal Payments		Scheduled Principal Payments
Six Months ending December 31, 2014	$	20,798
Three Months ending December 31, 2014			$	18,898
2015		42,683		42,683
2016		98,702		98,720
2017		67,201		67,315
2018		19,789		19,909
2019		34,449		34,570
Thereafter		171,756		177,480

	$	455,378	$	459,575

In November 2013, we entered into an interest rate cap agreement with Wells Fargo that caps the interest rate on the note payable for our Champaign, Illinois property. The agreement provides that the interest rate on the note payable for this property is capped at a certain interest rate when one-month LIBOR is in excess of 3.0%. The fair value of the interest rate cap agreement is recorded in other assets on our accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets. We record changes in the fair value of the interest rate cap agreement quarterly based on the current market valuations at quarter end as other income (loss) on our accompanying condensed consolidated statements of operations. Generally, we will estimate the fair value of our interest rate cap using estimates of value provided by the counterparty and our own assumptions in

the absence of observable market data, including estimated remaining life, counterparty credit risk, current market yield and interest rate spreads of similar securities as of the measurement date. At ~~June~~September 30, 2014, our interest rate cap agreement was valued using Level 3 inputs of the hierarchy established by ASC 820, “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures.” The following table summarizes the key terms of each interest rate cap agreement (dollars in thousands):


								As of September 30,				As of December 31,
	Notional							2014				2013
Interest Rate Cap	Amount		LIBOR Cap			Maturity Date		Cost		Fair Value		Cost		Fair Value
November 26, 2013	$	8,200		3.00	%		December 1, 2016	$	31	$	7	$	31	$	22

The fair value of all mortgage notes payable outstanding as of ~~June~~September 30, 2014, was ~~$462.1~~$467.5 million, as compared to the carrying value stated above of ~~$456.2~~$460.4 million. The fair value is calculated based on a discounted cash flow analysis, using interest rates based on management’s estimate of market interest rates on long-term debt with comparable terms and loan to value ratios. The fair value was calculated using Level 3 inputs of the hierarchy established by ASC 820, “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures.”

In August 2013, we procured a $60.0 million senior unsecured revolving credit facility, or the Line of Credit, with KeyBank National Association (serving as a revolving lender, a letter of credit issuer and administrative agent) and Citizens Bank of Pennsylvania as an additional lender. On December 16, 2013, Comerica Bank was also added as an additional lender. On March 28, 2014, we amended our Line of Credit to extend the maturity date one additional year to August 2017. We also modified certain terms under the Line of Credit, including the calculation of the total asset value and unencumbered asset value. The applicable LIBOR margins were also reduced by 25 basis points at each pricing level. As a result of these modifications, the availability under our line of credit increased by $1.3 million.

The Line of Credit initially matures in August 2017; however, we have a one-year extension option subject to the payment of an extension fee equal to 25 basis points on the initial maturity date and certain other customary conditions.

The Line of Credit has a letter of credit sublimit of up to $20.0 million. In addition, we may expand the Line of Credit up to a total of $75.0 million upon satisfaction of certain conditions, including obtaining commitments from any one or more lenders, whether or not currently a party to the Line of Credit, to provide such increased amounts and payment of the associated up front and arrangement fees at the time of such increase. The interest rate per annum applicable to the Line of Credit is equal to the LIBOR plus an applicable margin of up to 3.0%, depending upon our leverage. The leverage ratio used in determining the applicable margin for interest on the Line of Credit is recalculated quarterly. We are subject to an annual maintenance fee of $0.03 million per year and an unused commitment fee of 25 basis points per year, which accrues quarterly. Our ability to access this source of financing is subject to our continued ability to meet customary lending requirements, such as compliance with financial and operating covenants and our meeting certain lending limits. One such covenant requires us to limit distributions to our stockholders to 100% of our FFO, with acquisition-related costs required to be expensed under ASC 805 added back to FFO. In addition, the maximum amount we may draw under the Line of Credit is based on a percentage of the value of a pool of unencumbered properties which must meet agreed upon eligibility standards.

If and when long-term mortgages are arranged for properties in the unencumbered pool, the banks will reduce the availability under the Line of Credit by the amount advanced against that property’s value. Conversely, as we purchase new properties meeting the eligibility standards, we may add these new properties to the unencumbered pool to obtain additional availability under the Line of Credit. The availability under the Line of Credit is also reduced by letters of credit used in the ordinary course of business. We may use the advances under the Line of Credit for both general corporate purposes and the acquisition of new investments.

As of ~~June~~September 30, 2014, there was ~~$25.7~~$45.6 million outstanding under our Line of Credit at an interest rate of approximately ~~3.2%~~2.9% and ~~$6.8~~$5.8 million outstanding under letters of credit at a weighted average interest rate of ~~3.0%~~2.75%. As of ~~June~~September 30, 2014, the maximum additional amount we could draw was ~~$19.7~~$5.3 million. We were in compliance with all covenants under the Line of Credit as of ~~June~~September 30, 2014. The amount outstanding on the Line of Credit as of ~~June~~September 30, 2014 approximates fair value, because the debt is subject to a variable interest rate, determined by market forces, as well as a recently negotiated interest rate spread.

In February 2012, we completed a public offering of 1,540,000 shares of 7.125% Series C Cumulative Term Preferred Stock, par value $0.001 per share, or the Term Preferred Stock, at a public offering price of $25.00 per share. Gross proceeds of the offering totaled $38.5 million and net proceeds, after deducting offering expenses borne by us, were $36.7 million and were used to repay a portion of outstanding

borrowings under our Line of Credit, for acquisitions of real estate and for working capital. The Term Preferred Stock is traded under the ticker symbol GOODN on the NASDAQ Global Select Market, or the NASDAQ. The Term Preferred Stock is not convertible into our common stock or any other security of ours. Generally, we may not redeem shares of the Term Preferred Stock prior to January 31, 2016, except in limited circumstances to preserve our status as a REIT. On or after January 31, 2016, we may redeem the shares at a redemption price of $25.00 per share, plus any accumulated and unpaid dividends to and including the date of redemption. The shares of the Term Preferred Stock have a mandatory redemption date of January 31, 2017. We incurred $1.8 million in total offering costs related to these transactions, which have been recorded as deferred financing costs on the condensed consolidated balance ~~sheet~~sheets and will be amortized over the redemption period ending January 31, 2017.

The Term Preferred Stock is recorded as liability in accordance with ASC 480, “Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity,” which states that mandatorily redeemable financial instruments should be classified as liabilities and therefore the related dividend payments are treated as a component of interest expense in the condensed consolidated statements of operations.

The fair value of our Term Preferred Stock as of ~~June~~September 30, 2014, was ~~$40.2~~$40.5 million, as compared to the carrying value stated above of $38.5 million. The fair value is calculated based on the closing share price as of ~~June~~September 30, 2014 of ~~$26.10.~~$26.28. The fair value was calculated using Level 1 inputs of the hierarchy established by ASC 820, “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures.”

We are obligated as lessee under three ground leases. Future minimum rental payments due under the terms of these leases for the remainder of 2014 and each of the five succeeding years and thereafter, are as follows (dollars in thousands):


			For the year ended December 31,																For the year ended December 31,
Location	Lease End Date		2014		2015		2016		2017		2018		2019		Thereafter		Lease End Date		2014		2015		2016		2017		2018		2019		Thereafter

Tulsa, OK		Apr-21	$	76	$	153	$	153	$	153	$	153	$	153	$	229		Apr-21	$	38	$	153	$	153	$	153	$	153	$	153	$	229
Dartmouth, MA		May-36		87		174		174		174		174		174		3,300		May-36		44		174		174		174		174		174		3,300
Springfield, MA		Feb-30		43		86		86		89		90		90		972		Feb-30		21		86		86		89		90		90		972

			$	206	$	413	$	413	$	416	$	417	$	417	$	4,501			$	103	$	413	$	413	$	416	$	417	$	417	$	4,501

Rental expense for the properties listed above is recorded straight-line over the term of the lease and was ~~$0.2~~$0.3 million during both the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2014 and 2013. Rental expenses are reflected in property operating expenses on the condensed consolidated statements of operations.

We have committed to provide tenant improvement funding for certain properties. The following table reflects unconditional purchase obligations which have not been recognized on the balance sheet as of ~~June~~September 30, 2014. ~~In addition, we have committed to provide financing to expand our building located in Canton, North Carolina.~~ Future tenant improvement payments due on these properties for the remainder of 2014 and each of the five succeeding years and thereafter, are as follows (dollars in thousands):

The following table summarizes the changes in our stockholders’ equity for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2014 (dollars in thousands):


																													Distributions in
																								Additional		Notes			Excess of			Total
	Preferred Stock		Senior Common Stock		Common Stock		Additional Paid in Capital		Notes Receivable from Employees			Distributions in Excess of Accumulated Earnings			Total Stockholders’ Equity			Preferred		Senior Common		Common		Paid in		Receivable			Accumulated			Stockholders’
																		Stock		Stock		Stock		Capital		from Employees			Earnings			Equity
Balance at December 31, 2013	$	2	$	—	$	16	$	298,751	$	(375	)	$	(115,248	)	$	183,146		$	2	$	—	$	16	$	298,751	$	(375	)	$	(115,248	)	$	183,146

Issuance of senior common stock and common stock, net		—		—		2		34,099		—			—			34,101			—		1		2		40,332		—			—			40,335

Distributions declared to common, senior common and preferred stockholders		—		—		—		—		—			(14,400	)		(14,400	)		—		—		—		—		—			(22,219	)		(22,219	)

Net loss		—		—		—		—		—			(12,297	)		(12,297	)		—		—		—		—		—			(12,066	)		(12,066	)

Balance at September 30, 2014																		$	2	$	1	$	18	$	339,083	$	(375	)	$	(149,533	)	$	189,196

Balance at June 30, 2014	$	2	$	—	$	18	$	332,850	$	(375	)	$	(141,945	)	$	190,550

Our Board of Directors declared the following distributions per share for the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2014 and 2013:


	For the three months ended June 30,				For the six months ended June 30,
	2014		2013		2014		2013		For the three months ended September 30,				For the nine months ended September 30,
									2014		2013		2014		2013
Common Stock	$	0.38	$	0.38	$	0.75	$	0.75	$	0.375	$	0.375	$	1.125	$	1.125
Senior Common Stock		0.26		0.26		0.53		0.53		0.2625		0.2625		0.7875		0.7875
Series A Preferred Stock		0.4843749		0.4843749		0.9687498		0.9687498		0.4843749		0.4843749		1.4531247		1.4531247
Series B Preferred Stock		0.4688	��	0.4688		0.9375		0.9375		0.4688		0.4688		1.4063		1.4063
Series C Preferred Stock		0.4453		0.4453		0.8906		0.8906		0.4453		0.4453		1.3359		1.3359

On June 6, 2014, we completed a public offering of 1,610,000 shares of our common stock at a public offering price of $17.00 per share. Gross proceeds of the offering totaled $27.4 million and net proceeds, after deducting offering expenses borne by us, were $26.0 million, which we used to acquire real estate.

~~We have~~On September 2, 2014, we entered into an open market sale ~~agreement,~~arrangement, or the ATM Program, with Cantor Fitzgerald & Co., or Cantor Fitzgerald, pursuant to which we may, from time to time, offer to sell shares of our common stock with an aggregate sales price of up to $100.0 million on the open market through Cantor Fitzgerald, acting as sales agent and/or principal. Under the open market sales arrangement, Cantor Fitzgerald is entitled to compensation equal to up to 2.0% of the gross proceeds of the common shares it sells. During the three months ended September 30, 2014, we sold a total of 0.2 million shares with aggregate net proceeds of $3.3 million, and have a remaining capacity to sell up to $96.6 million of common stock under the ATM program with Cantor Fitzgerald.

On August 26, 2014, we provided notice of our termination of our prior open market sale arrangement, or the Prior ATM program, with Jefferies LLC, or Jefferies, under which we ~~may, from time to time, offer~~offered to sell shares of our common stock with an aggregate sales price of up to $25.0 million on the open market through Jefferies, as agent, or to Jefferies, as principal. From November 2009 through August 2014, we issued and sold $21.8 million in gross proceeds under the Prior ATM program. During the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2014, we raised approximately $7.6 million in net proceeds under the Prior ATM Program. As of June 30, 2014, under the existing program, we have sold a total of 1.2 million shares with aggregate gross proceeds of $21.8 million, and have a remaining capacity to sell up to $3.2 million of common stock under the ATM Program with Jefferies.program.

In March 2011, we commenced an offering of an aggregate of 3,500,000 shares of our senior common stock, par value $0.001 per share, at a price to the public of $15.00 per share, of which 3,000,000 shares are intended to be offered pursuant to the primary offering and 500,000 shares are intended to be offered pursuant to our senior common distribution reinvestment plan, or the DRIP. We, however, reserve the right to reallocate the number of shares being offered between the primary offering and the DRIP. As of ~~June~~September 30, 2014, we had sold ~~369,553~~593,659 shares of senior common stock in this ongoing offering, for gross proceeds of ~~$5.5~~$8.9 million, and issued an additional ~~15,008~~18,479 shares of senior common stock under the DRIP ~~program, and have a remaining capacity to sell up to $47.0 million of senior common stock.~~program.

The following table is a summary of the outstanding note receivable from an employee of the Adviser for the exercise of stock options (dollars in thousands):


Date Issued	Outstanding Balance of Employee Loan at June 30, 2014		Outstanding Balance of Employee Loan at December 31, 2013		Maturity Date of Note	Interest Rate on Note			Outstanding Balance of Employee Loan at September 30, 2014		Outstanding Balance of Employee Loan at December 31, 2013		Maturity Date of Note		Interest Rate on Note

Nov 2006	$	375	$	375	Nov 2015		8.15	%	$	375	$	375		Nov 2015		8.15	%

In accordance with ASC 505-10-45-2, “Equity,” receivables from employees for the issuance of capital stock to employees prior to the receipt of cash payment should be reflected in the balance sheet as a reduction to stockholders’ equity. Therefore, this note was recorded as a full recourse loan to the employee and is included in the equity section of the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets. As of ~~June~~September 30, 2014, this loan maintained its full recourse status.

On ~~July 1,~~October 7, 2014, our Board of Directors declared the following monthly distributions:


Senior Common Stock Distributions
Payable to the Holders of Record During the Month of:	Payment Date	Distribution per Share
October	November 7, 2014	$	0.0875
November	December 5, 2014		0.0875
December	January 8, 2015		0.0875

Total		$	0.2625

On October 16, 2014, we ~~acquired~~executed a ~~124,800 square foot building~~lease with a tenant to occupy our previously vacant property located in ~~Aurora, Colorado for $8.3 million, excluding related acquisition expenses~~Richmond, Virginia. The lease was effective as of ~~$0.08 million. We funded this acquisition with existing cash on hand.~~September 8, 2014 and has a three-year term. The tenant has ~~leased~~an early termination option at any time after July 31, 2016, contingent upon the ~~property for 15 years and has 2 options~~tenant losing a contract with the vendor supporting their operations in our building. The tenant is subject to ~~renew the lease for an additional 5 years each.~~a termination payment of approximately $0.03 million if they exercise this option. The lease provides for prescribed rent escalations over the life of the lease, with annualized straight line rents of ~~$0.8~~approximately $0.2 million. The ~~accounting~~tenant has one option to renew the lease for ~~this transaction has not been completed. As a result,~~an additional period of three years. In connection with the ~~required ASC 805 disclosures have not been made.~~extension of the lease and modification of certain terms of the lease, we paid $0.1 million in leasing commissions, no tenant improvements were paid in connection with the lease extension.

On ~~July 7,~~October 22, 2014, we extended the lease with ~~one of~~ the ~~tenants~~tenant occupying our property located in ~~Akron, Ohio.~~Canton, North Carolina. We financed a $5.5 million expansion project on this property, which added an additional 150,000 square feet to the building, which was completed in September 2014. The ~~new~~ lease ~~covers approximately two-thirds of the space and~~covering this property was extended for an additional ~~five~~10 years, through ~~March 2020.~~September 2034. The lease was originally set to expire in ~~March 2015. This tenant will continue to pay its existing rent through March 2015.~~July 2024. The ~~new~~ lease provides for prescribed rent escalations over the life of the lease, with annualized straight line rents of approximately $1.4 million, as compared to straight line rents of $0.6 million under the previous lease.

On October 27, 2014, we extended the lease with the tenant occupying our property located in South Hadley, Massachusetts. The lease covering this property was extended for an additional two years through January 2017. The lease was originally set to expire in January 2015. The lease provides a scheduled rent increase over the previous lease, with annualized straight line rents of approximately $0.3 million. The ~~lease grants the~~ tenant has two options to ~~extend~~renew the lease for an additional ~~five years each. In connection with the extension~~periods of ~~the lease and the modification of certain terms under the lease, we paid $0.1 million in leasing commissions, and $0.9 million in tenant improvements.~~

~~On July 15, 2014, our Board of Directors declared the following monthly distributions:~~

Senior Common Stock Distributions

Payable to the Holders of Record During the Month of:
   Payment Date    Distribution per Share
July
   August 7, 2014    $ 0.0875
August
   September 8, 2014    0.0875
September
   October 7, 2014    0.0875


Total
      $ 0.2625

On July 25, 2014, we closed a $5.6 million second mortgage development loan for the construction of an 81,371 square foot, build-to-suit transitional care facility located on a major hospital campus in Phoenix, Arizona. Construction is scheduled to be completed in approximately twelve months and we will earn 9.0% interest, paid currently in cash, on the loan during construction and through maturity. Prior to completion of the facility, we will be granted a right of first offer to purchase the property. If we do not purchase the property we will receive an exit fee when the property is sold and the loan is repaid in an amount sufficient for us to earn an internal rate of return of 22% on the second mortgage development loan. The loan is scheduled to mature in July 2016, but has a one year ~~extension option.~~each.

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

All statements contained herein, other than historical facts, may constitute “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Exchange Act. These statements may relate to, among other things, future events or our future performance or financial condition. In some cases, you can identify forward-looking statements by terminology such as “may,” “might,” “believe,” “will,” “provided,” “anticipate,” “future,” “could,” “growth,” “plan,” “intend,” “expect,” “should,” “would,” “if,” “seek,” “possible,” “potential,” “likely” or the negative of such terms or comparable terminology. These forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause our business, financial condition, liquidity, results of operations, funds from operations or prospects to be materially different from any future business, financial condition, liquidity, results of operations, funds from operations or prospects expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. For further information about these and other factors that could affect our future results, please see the captions titled “Forward-Looking Statements” and “Risk ~~Factors��~~Factors” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013. We caution readers not to place undue reliance on any such forward-looking statements, which are made pursuant to the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and, as such, speak only as of the date made. We undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, after the date of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

All references to “we,” “our,” “us” and the “Company” in this Report mean Gladstone Commercial Corporation and its consolidated subsidiaries, except where the context indicates that the term means only Gladstone Commercial Corporation.

We are an externally-advised real estate investment trust, or REIT, that was incorporated under the General Corporation Law of the State of Maryland on February 14, 2003, primarily for the purpose of investing in and owning net leased industrial, commercial and retail real property and selectively making long-term industrial and commercial mortgage loans. Our portfolio of real estate is leased to a wide cross section of tenants ranging from small businesses to large public companies, many of which are corporations that do not have publicly-rated debt. We have historically entered into, and intend in the future to enter into, purchase agreements for real estate having triple net leases with terms of approximately 10 to 15 years and built in rental rate increases. Under a triple net lease, the tenant is required to pay all operating, maintenance and insurance costs and real estate taxes with respect to the leased property. We actively communicate with buyout funds, real estate brokers and other third parties to locate properties for potential acquisition or to provide mortgage financing in an effort to build our portfolio. We currently own 93 properties totaling ~~10.0~~9.8 million square feet, which have a total gross and net carrying value, including intangible assets, of ~~$825.0~~$816.4 million and ~~$696.9~~$692.0 million, respectively. These amounts are not inclusive of our Roseville, Minnesota property that is currently in receivership and will be returned to our lender via a deed in lieu transaction. We ~~do not~~also currently have ~~any~~one mortgage loan ~~receivables outstanding.~~receivable outstanding for $5.6 million.

The ~~United States, or~~strength of the global economy and the U.S., economy in particular, continues to ~~see~~be uncertain and volatile, and we remain cautious about a long-term signs of recovery as the unemployment rate continues to decline, housing starts and building permits have increased, and prices for single-family homes continue to increase because of a dwindling surplus in the housing market. However, various signs of weakness are still present in the U.S economy.economic recovery. Vacancy rates in certain markets are still higher than pre-recessionary levels, as job growth has yet to return to all areas of the country. Major markets however, have experienced reductions in vacancy rates over the past 12 months for both office and industrial properties. These vacancy reductions are the result of increased demand combined with construction activity that is well below prior market peaks. Interest rates have ~~declined~~increased since the beginning of the year, but remain at historic lows and this continued low interest rate environment is leading to increasing competition for new acquisitions. ~~Concerns continue to linger over~~In addition, the federal government shutdown in October 2013 combined with the uncertainty surrounding the ability of the U.S. Congress to pass additional debt ceiling legislation prior to March 2015 given the budget impasse that resulted in the partial shutdown of the U.S. government in October 2013. The continued uncertainty surrounding the outcome of the U.S.federal government to ~~raise~~address its fiscal condition in both the federal debt ceiling could cause the ratings agencies to lower the long-term sovereign credit rating on the U.S. again. The sovereign credit rating was previously lowered from “AAA” to “AA+” by Standardnear and ~~Poor’s in August 2011. The impact of this or any further downgrades to the U.S.~~long term have increased domestic and global economic instability.

government’s sovereign credit rating, or its perceived creditworthiness, is inherently unpredictable and could adversely affect the U.S. and global financial markets and economic conditions. There can be no assurance that governmental or other measures to aid economic recovery will be effective. These developments and the government’s credit concerns in general, could cause interest rates and borrowing costs to rise, which may negatively impact our ability to access both the debt and equity markets on favorable terms. In addition, a further decrease to the U.S. credit rating could create broader financial turmoil and uncertainty, which may weigh heavily on our stock price. Continued adverse economic conditions could have a material adverse effect on one or more of our tenants, or our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We continue to focus on re-leasing vacant space, renewing upcoming lease maturities and acquiring additional properties. ~~As of June 30, 2014, we had two fully~~We now only have one vacant ~~buildings~~building located in Baytown, ~~Texas and~~Texas. We signed a three-year lease on our Richmond, ~~Virginia.~~Virginia property with a new tenant, which was effective September 8, 2014. The available space at ~~these two properties comprised~~the Baytown, Texas property comprises less than 1.0% of our total square footage as of ~~June~~September 30, 2014 and the annual carrying costs are approximately ~~$0.3~~$0.1 million. We continue to actively seek a new ~~tenants~~tenant for ~~these properties.~~this property.

Our ability to make new investments is highly dependent upon our ability to procure external financing. Our principal sources of external financing generally include the issuance of equity securities, long-term mortgage loans secured by properties and borrowings under our line of credit, or the Line of Credit. The market for long-term mortgages continues to improve and long-term mortgages ~~have become more~~are readily obtainable. The collateralized mortgage backed securities, or CMBS, market ~~has recovered,~~remains active but it is more conservative and restrictive than it was prior to the recession and uncertainty with regard to interest rates has made the CMBS market less predictable. We continue to look to regional banks, insurance companies and other non-bank lenders, in addition to the CMBS market to issue mortgages to finance our real estate activities.

In addition to leverage, we have been active in the equity markets during 2014. We have issued shares of common stock in both an overnight offering in June and through our at-the-market ~~program,~~programs, or ATM ~~Program,~~Programs, pursuant to anour former open market sale agreement with Jefferies, LLC, or Jefferies, and our recent agreement with Cantor Fitzgerald & Co., or Cantor Fitzgerald, each discussed in more detail below. In addition, we have issued shares of our convertible senior common stock, also discussed in more detail below.

Allen and Colleyville, Texas: On March 27, 2014, we acquired two office buildings, totaling 42,000 square feet, located in Allen and Colleyville, Texas for a total of $10.0 million, excluding related acquisition expenses of ~~$0.06~~$0.07 million. We funded these acquisitions with existing cash on hand as well as assuming $6.3 million of existing mortgage debt on the properties. The same tenant has leased both properties for 12 years and has 4 options to renew the lease for additional periods of 5 years each. The leases provide for prescribed rent escalations over the life of the lease, with annualized straight line rents of $1.0 million.

Rancho Cordova, California: On April 22, 2014, we acquired a 61,358 square foot office building located in Rancho Cordova, California for $8.2 million, excluding related acquisition expenses of $0.07 million. We funded this acquisition with existing cash on hand and the issuance of $4.9 million of mortgage debt on the property. The tenant has leased the property for 10 years and has 1 option to renew the lease for an additional 5 years. The lease provides for prescribed rent escalations over the life of the lease, with annualized straight line gross rents of $0.9 million.

Coppell, Texas: On May 8, 2014, we acquired an office building, totaling 21,171 square feet, located in Coppell, Texas for a total of $5.8 million, excluding related acquisition expenses of ~~$0.02~~$0.03 million. We funded these acquisitions with existing cash on hand as well as assuming $3.8 million of existing mortgage debt on this property. The tenant has leased this property for 12 years and has 4 options to renew the lease for additional periods of 5 years each. The lease provides for prescribed rent escalations over the life of the lease, with annualized straight line rents of $0.6 million.

Columbus, Ohio: On May 13, 2014, we acquired a 114,786 square foot office building located in Columbus, Ohio for $11.8 million, excluding related acquisition expenses of ~~$0.06~~$0.07 million. We funded this acquisition with existing cash on hand. There are 2 tenants in this property, the largest of which occupies 92% of the space and has 9.5 years remaining on the lease. The other tenant has 2.5 years remaining on the lease. The two leases provide for prescribed rent escalations over the life of the respective leases, with annualized straight line rents of $1.3 million.

Taylor, Pennsylvania: On June 9, 2014, we acquired a 955,935 square foot bulk distribution warehouse located in a submarket of Scranton, Pennsylvania for $39.0 million, excluding related acquisition expenses of $0.7 million. We funded this acquisition with existing cash on hand as well as the issuance of $22.6 million of mortgage debt on the property. The tenant has leased the property for 10 years and has 3 options to renew the lease for an additional 5 years each and a fourth successive term of 4 years and 11 months. The lease provides for prescribed rent escalations over the life of the lease, with annualized straight line rents of $3.4 million.

Aurora, Colorado:On July 1, 2014, we acquired a 124,800 square foot building located in Aurora, Colorado, an eastern submarket of Denver near the Denver International Airport, for $8.3 million, excluding related acquisition expenses of ~~$0.08~~$0.09 million. We funded this acquisition with existing cash on hand. The tenant has leased the property for 15 years and has 2 options to renew the lease for an additional 5 years each. The lease provides for prescribed rent escalations over the life of the lease, with annualized straight line rents of $0.8 million.

Phoenix, Arizona: On July 25, 2014, we closed a $5.6 million second mortgage development loan for the construction of an 81,371 square foot, build-to-suit transitional care facility located on a major hospital campus in Phoenix, Arizona. Construction is scheduled to be completed ~~in approximately twelve months~~by July 2015 and we will earn 9.0% interest, paid currently in cash, on the loan during construction and through maturity. Prior to completion of the facility, we will be granted a right of first offer to purchase the ~~property.~~property at fair value. If we do not purchase the property we will receive an exit fee when the property is sold and the loan is repaid in an amount sufficient for us to earn an internal rate of return of 22% on the second mortgage development loan. The loan is scheduled to mature in July 2016, but has a one year extension option.

Indianapolis, Indiana:On September 3, 2014, we acquired an 86,495 square foot office building located in Indianapolis, Indiana for $10.5 million, excluding related acquisition expenses of $0.06 million. We funded this acquisition with existing cash on hand as well as the issuance of $6.1 million of mortgage debt on the property. There are 7 tenants in this property, the largest of which occupies 71% of the space and has 11.5 years remaining on the lease. This tenant has 2 options to renew the lease for an additional 5 years each. The remaining tenants are occupying between 1,427 and 7,639 square feet in their respective suites, with lease terms expiring from December 2015 through October 2018. Six out of seven leases provide for prescribed rent escalations over the life of the respective leases, with annualized straight line gross rents for all leases of $1.5 million.

Sterling Heights, Michigan: On June 6, 2014, we completed the sale of our Sterling Heights, Michigan property for $11.4 million and recognized a gain on sale of $1.2 million. We considered this industrial asset to be non-core to our long term strategy, and we re-deployed the proceeds from this sale into new acquisitions described above.

Wells Fargo: On March 27, 2014, through two wholly-owned subsidiaries, we assumed $6.3 million pursuant to a long-term note payable from Wells Fargo, which is collateralized by a security interest in two of our properties. The note accrues interest at a fixed rate of 5.583% per year and the note has a maturity date of February 2016. We assumed the note in connection with the acquisition of the two properties located in Allen and Colleyville, Texas.

KeyBank Line of Credit: On March 28, 2014, we amended our Line of Credit to extend the maturity date one additional year to August 2017. We also modified certain terms under the Line of Credit, including the calculation of the total asset value and unencumbered asset value. The applicable London Interbank Offered Rate, or LIBOR, margins were also reduced by 25 basis points at each pricing level. As a result of these modifications, the availability under our ~~line~~Line of ~~credit~~Credit increased by $1.3 million.

KeyBank: On April 22, 2014, through a wholly-owned subsidiary, we borrowed $4.9 million pursuant to a long-term note payable from KeyBank National Association, which is collateralized by a security interest in one of our properties. The note accrues interest at a fixed rate of 4.9% per year and we may not repay this note prior to the last three months of the term, or we would be subject to a prepayment penalty. The note has a maturity date of May 1, 2024. We used the proceeds from the note to acquire the property in Rancho Cordova, California on the same date.

Wells Fargo: On May 8, 2014, through a wholly-owned subsidiary, we assumed $3.8 million pursuant to a long-term note payable from Wells Fargo, which is collateralized by a security interest in one of our properties. The note accrues interest at a fixed rate of 6.3% per year and ~~the note~~ has a maturity date of June 2016. We assumed the note in connection with the acquisition of the property located in Coppell, Texas on the same date.

Prudential: On June 9, 2014, through a wholly-owned subsidiary, we borrowed $22.6 million pursuant to a long-term note payable from Prudential Mortgage Capital Company, which is collateralized by a security interest in one of our properties. The note accrues interest at a fixed rate of 4.23% per year and ~~the note~~ has a maturity date of July 1, 2019. We used the proceeds from the note to acquire the property in Taylor, Pennsylvania on the same date.

Everbank: On September 3, 2014, through a wholly-owned subsidiary, we borrowed $6.1 million pursuant to a long-term note payable from Everbank, which is collateralized by a security interest in one of our properties. The note accrues interest at a fixed rate of 4.4% per year and has a maturity date of October 1, 2024. We used the proceeds from the note to acquire the property in Indianapolis, Indiana on the same date.

Newburyport, Massachusetts: On April 4, 2014, our tenant occupying our Newburyport, Massachusetts property notified us of their intention not to exercise their renewal option as the tenant is relocating to Rhode Island. The tenant will continue paying rent and operating expenses through the lease termination date of April 30, 2015. A marketing representative has been hired and re-leasing activity is currently underway.

Austin, Texas: On May 6, 2014, we extended the lease with the tenant occupying our property located in Austin, Texas. The lease covering this property was extended for an additional eight years, through June 2022. The lease was originally set to expire in June 2015. The lease provides for prescribed rent escalations over the life of the lease, with annualized straight line rents of approximately $0.7 million. In connection with the extension of the lease and modification of certain terms of the lease, we paid $0.2 million in leasing commissions, and will pay $1.3 million in tenant improvements prior to second quarter 2015.

Burnsville, Minnesota: On June 11, 2014, we extended the lease with the tenant occupying our property located in Burnsville, Minnesota. The new lease covers approximately two-thirds of the space and was extended for an additional eight years, through January 2023. The lease was originally set to expire in June 2015. The tenant in this property will continue to pay rent on the entire building through June 2015, and we are working to identify tenants to lease the ~~remainder~~remaining one-third of the building. The new lease provides for prescribed rent escalations over the life of the lease, with annualized straight line rents of $1.0 million. Rental income per square foot increased 14% from the previous lease. The lease grants the tenant two options to extend the lease for an additional 3three years each. In connection with the extension of the lease and the modification of certain terms under the lease, we paid $0.5 million in leasing commissions, and will pay $3.3 million in tenant improvements prior to the end of first quarter 2015.

Akron, Ohio: On July 7, 2014, we extended the lease with one of the tenants occupying our property located in Akron, Ohio. The new lease covers approximately two-thirds of the space and was extended for an additional five years, through March 2020. ~~The second tenant in the property continues to occupy the remaining one-third of space.~~ The lease was originally set to expire in March 2015. This tenant will continue to pay its existing rent through March 2015. The new lease provides for prescribed rent escalations over the life of the lease, with annualized straight line rents of $0.6 million. The lease grants the tenant two options to extend the lease for an additional five years each. In connection with the extension of the lease and the modification of certain terms under the lease, we paid ~~$0.1~~$0.2 million in leasing commissions, and will pay $0.9 million in tenant improvements prior to the end of second quarter 2015. The second tenant in the property continues to occupy the remaining one-third of space.

Austin and San Antonio, Texas:On August 1, 2014, we modified the lease with the tenant occupying two of our properties located in Austin and San Antonio, Texas. The leases covering these respective properties were adjusted to defer rental payments covering the period September 1, 2014 through November 30, 2014. The tenants are current on their rental payments through the quarter ended September 30, 2014.

Concord Township, Ohio: On September 25, 2014, we modified the lease with the tenant occupying our property located in Concord Township, Ohio. The lease covering this property was adjusted to defer a portion of rental payments covering the period August 2014 through December 2014. The tenant will repay the deferred rent balance monthly during calendar year 2015. This rental deferral has no impact on the annualized straight line rents recognized on this property. The tenant is current on their rental payments through the quarter ended September 30, 2014.

Richmond, Virginia: On October 16, 2014, we executed a lease with a tenant to occupy our previously vacant property located in Richmond, Virginia. The lease became effective as of September 8, 2014 and has a three-year term. The tenant has an early termination option at any time after July 31, 2016, contingent upon the tenant losing a contract with the vendor supporting their operations in our building. The tenant is subject to a termination payment of approximately $0.03 million if they exercise this option. The lease provides for prescribed rent escalations over the life of the lease, with annualized straight line rents of approximately $0.2 million. The tenant has one option to renew the lease for an additional period of three years. In connection with the extension of the lease and modification of certain terms of the lease, we paid $0.1 million in leasing commissions, no tenant improvements were paid in connection with the lease extension.

Canton, North Carolina: On October 22, 2014, we extended the lease with the tenant occupying our property located in Canton, North Carolina. We financed a $5.5 million expansion project on this property, which added an additional 150,000 square feet to the building, which was completed in September 2014. The lease covering this property was extended for an additional 10 years, through September 2034. The lease was originally set to expire in July 2024. The lease provides for prescribed rent escalations over the life of the lease, with annualized straight line rents of approximately $1.4 million, as compared to straight line rents of $0.6 million under the previous lease.

South Hadley, Massachusetts: On October 27, 2014, we extended the lease with the tenant occupying our property located in South Hadley, Massachusetts. The lease covering this property was extended for an additional two years through January 2017. The lease was originally set to expire in January 2015. The lease provides a scheduled rent increase over the previous lease, with annualized straight line rents of approximately $0.3 million. The tenant has two options to renew the lease for additional periods of one year each.

The equity issuances summarized below were issued under our universal shelf registration statement (File No. 333-190931) that was effective and on file with the Securities and Exchange Commission at the time of each respective issuance.

Common Equity: We completed a public offering totaling 1,610,000 shares of common stock, which closed on June 6, 2014, at a public offering price of $17.00 per share. Gross proceeds of this offering totaled $27.4 million and net proceeds, after deducting offering expenses and underwriter discounts, were $26.0 million. The proceeds from this offering were used to acquire real estate.

ATM ~~Program:~~Programs: During ~~the six months ended June 30,~~ 2014, we have raised ~~approximately $7.6~~an aggregate of $28.1 million in net proceeds under our ATM ~~Program~~Programs with ~~Jefferies.~~both Jefferies and Cantor Fitzgerald. Proceeds from ~~this offering~~these offerings were used to acquire real estate, repay indebtedness and for other general corporate purposes. ~~Under this~~On August 26, 2014, we provided notice of termination of our prior open market sale agreement with Jefferies LLC, or Jefferies, under which we ~~may, from time to time, offer~~offered to sell shares of our common stock with an aggregate sales price of up to $25.0 million on the open market through Jefferies, as agent, or to Jefferies, as principal. We raised $7.6 million in net proceeds under the Prior ATM sales agreement during the nine months ended September 30, 2014. On September 2, 2014, we entered into a new At the Market sales agreement with Cantor Fitzgerald, or the New ATM program. Under this agreement we may, from time to time, offer to sell shares of our common stock with an aggregate sales price of up to $100.0 million on the open market through Cantor Fitzgerald, as agent, or to Cantor Fitzgerald, as principal, based upon our instructions (including any price, time or size limits or other customary parameters or conditions that we may impose). We have raised $20.5 million in net proceeds under the New ATM program. Sales of shares of our common stock through ~~Jefferies~~our New ATM Program will be executed by means of ordinary brokers’ transactions on the NASDAQ Global Select Market, or the NASDAQ, or otherwise at market prices, in privately negotiated transactions, crosses or block transactions, as may be agreed between us and ~~Jefferies,~~Cantor Fitzgerald, including a combination of any of these transactions.

Senior Common Equity: During ~~the six months ended June 30,~~ 2014, we have sold ~~61,574~~285,680 shares of our senior common stock at $15.00 per share in an ongoing best-efforts public offering and issued ~~5,756~~9,226 shares of our senior common stock under the Dividend Reinvestment Plan, or DRIP, program. The net proceeds, after deducting the underwriting discount and commission were ~~$0.8~~$3.9 million. We can issue up to 3,000,000 shares of senior common stock and the offering will continue until the earlier of March 28, 2015 or the date on which a total of 3,000,000 shares of senior common stock are sold. Proceeds from this offering were used to acquire real estate and for general corporate purposes.

Gladstone Management Corporation, or our Adviser, seeks to diversify our portfolio to avoid dependence on any one particular tenant, industry or geographic market. By diversifying our portfolio, our Adviser intends to reduce the adverse effect on our portfolio of a single under-performing investment or a downturn in any particular industry or geographic market. The table below reflects the breakdown of our total rental income by tenant industry classification for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively (dollars in thousands):


	For the six months ended June 30,										For the nine months ended September 30,
	2014					2013					2014					2013
Industry Classification	Rental Income		Percentage of Rental Income			Rental Income		Percentage of Rental Income			Rental Income		Percentage of Rental Income			Rental Income		Percentage of Rental Income
Telecommunications	$	6,338		18.5	%	$	4,665		16.7	%	$	9,453		18.0	%	$	7,322		16.8	%
Automobile		4,516		13.2			1,431		5.1			6,522		12.3			3,455		7.9
Healthcare		3,912		11.4			3,729		13.4			6,199		11.7			5,605		12.8
Electronics		2,755		8.1			2,228		8.0			4,414		8.4			3,604		8.3
Personal, Food & Miscellaneous Services		2,663		7.8			2,566		9.2			3,996		7.6			3,899		8.9
Diversified/Conglomerate Manufacturing		2,006		5.9			1,833		6.6			2,940		5.6			2,748		6.3
Chemicals, Plastics & Rubber		1,675		4.9			1,576		5.7			2,467		4.7			2,399		5.5
Beverage, Food & Tobacco		1,497		4.4			1,510		5.4			2,246		4.3			2,260		5.2
Diversified/Conglomerate Services												1,992		3.8			933		2.1
Personal & Non-Durable Consumer Products		1,302		3.8			1,290		4.6			1,953		3.7			1,937		4.4
Machinery		1,203		3.5			1,130		4.1			1,878		3.6			1,696		3.9
Buildings and Real Estate		1,084		3.2			1,076		3.9			1,631		3.1			1,618		3.7
Containers, Packaging & Glass		1,042		3.0			1,171		4.2			1,563		3.0			1,650		3.8
Printing & Publishing		920		2.7			929		3.3			1,397		2.7			1,389		3.2
Diversified/Conglomerate Services		830		2.4			622		2.2
Childcare		654		1.9			292		1.0			1,209		2.3			437		1.0
Oil & Gas		638		1.9			638		2.3			956		1.8			956		2.2
Banking		577		1.7			577		2.1			868		1.7			866		2.0
Education		328		1.0			328		1.2			492		0.9			492		1.1
Home & Office Furnishings		265		0.7			265		1.0			397		0.8			397		0.9

	$	34,205		100.0	%	$	27,856		100.0	%	$	52,573		100.0	%	$	43,663		100.0	%

The table below reflects the breakdown of our total rental income by state for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively (dollars in thousands):


	For the six months ended June 30,							For the six months ended June 30,							For the nine months ended September 30,							For the nine months ended September 30,
	2014							2013							2014							2013
State	Number of Leases		Rental Revenue		% of Base Rent			Number of Leases		Rental Revenue		% of Base Rent			Number of Leases		Rental Revenue		% of Base Rent			Number of Leases		Rental Revenue		% of Base Rent
Texas		10	$	5,618		16.4	%		5	$	2,028		7.3	%		10	$	8,646		16.4	%		7	$	4,414		10.1	%
Ohio		16		4,804		14.0			14		4,646		16.7			16		7,380		14.0			14		6,965		16.0
North Carolina		7		2,458		7.2			7		2,399		8.6			7		3,766		7.2			7		3,584		8.2
Minnesota		4		2,338		6.8			4		1,831		6.6			4		3,340		6.4			4		3,011		6.9
South Carolina		2		2,231		6.5			2		2,231		8.0			2		3,346		6.4			2		3,346		7.7
All Other States		40		16,756		49.1			36		14,721		52.8			49		26,095		49.6			37		22,343		51.1


Total		79	$	34,205		100	%		68	$	27,856		100	%		88	$	52,573		100	%		71	$	43,663		100	%

Our Adviser is led by a management team with extensive experience purchasing real estate and originating mortgage loans. Our Adviser is controlled by Mr. David Gladstone, our chairman and chief executive officer. Mr. Gladstone is also the chairman and chief executive officer of our Adviser. Terry Lee Brubaker, our vice chairman and chief operating officer, is also the vice chairman and chief operating officer of our Adviser. Gladstone Administration, LLC, or our Administrator, employs our chief financial officer and treasurer, chief compliance officer, general counsel and secretary ~~and their respective staffs. Our general counsel and secretary~~(who also serves as our Administrator’s ~~president.~~president), and their respective staffs. Mr. Gladstone is also the chairman and chief executive officer of our Administrator. Terry Lee Brubaker is also the vice chairman and chief operating officer of our Administrator.

Our Adviser and Administrator also provide investment advisory and administrative services, respectively, to certain of our affiliates, including, but not limited to, Gladstone Capital Corporation and Gladstone Investment Corporation, both publicly-traded business development companies, as well as Gladstone Land Corporation, a publicly-traded, ~~agricultural~~ real estate ~~company.~~investment trust. All of our directors are directors of Gladstone Capital Corporation, Gladstone Investment Corporation and Gladstone Land Corporation, with the exception of Mr. David Dullum, who is not a director of Gladstone Land Corporation. ~~In addition,~~With the exception of Danielle Jones, our Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer, and Robert Cutlip, our President, our other two ~~of our~~ executive officers, David Gladstone and Terry Brubaker, also serve as executive officers of Gladstone Capital Corporation, Gladstone Investment Corporation and Gladstone Land Corporation. In the future, our Adviser may provide investment advisory services to other companies, both public and private.

We are externally managed pursuant to contractual arrangements with our Adviser and our Administrator. Our Adviser and Administrator employ all of our personnel and pay their payroll, benefits and general expenses directly. We have an investment advisory agreement with our Adviser, or the Advisory Agreement, and an administration agreement with our Administrator, or the Administration Agreement.

Under the terms of the Advisory Agreement, we are responsible for all expenses incurred for our direct benefit. Examples of these expenses include legal, accounting, interest on short-term debt and mortgages, tax preparation, directors’ and officers’ insurance, stock transfer services, stockholder-related fees, consulting and related fees. In addition, we are also responsible for all fees charged by third parties that are directly related to our business, which include real estate brokerage fees, mortgage placement fees, lease-up fees and transaction structuring fees (although we may be able to pass some or all of such fees on to our tenants and borrowers).

The Advisory Agreement provides for an annual base management fee equal to 2.0% of our total stockholders’ equity, less the recorded value of any preferred stock and adjusted to exclude the effect of any unrealized gains, losses or other items that do not affect realized net income (including impairment charges), or total common stockholders’ equity, and for an incentive fee based on FFO. Our Adviser does not charge acquisition or disposition fees when we acquire or dispose of properties as is common with other externally-advised REITs; however, our Adviser may earn fee income from our borrowers or tenants or other sources.

For purposes of calculating the incentive fee, FFO includes any realized capital gains and capital losses, less any distributions paid on preferred stock and senior common stock, but FFO does not include any unrealized capital gains or losses (including impairment charges). The incentive fee would reward our Adviser if our quarterly FFO, before giving effect to any incentive fee, or pre-incentive fee FFO, exceeds 1.75%, or the hurdle rate, of total common stockholders’ equity. We pay our Adviser an incentive fee with respect to our pre-incentive fee FFO quarterly as follows:

The incentive fee may be reduced because of a covenant which exists in our Line of Credit agreement which limits distributions to our stockholders to 100% of FFO with acquisition-related costs that are required to be expensed under ASC 805, Business Combinations, added back to FFO. In order to comply with this covenant, our Board of Directors accepted our Adviser’s offer to unconditionally, irrevocably and voluntarily waive on a quarterly basis a portion of the incentive fee for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2014 and 2013, which allowed us to maintain the current level of distributions to our stockholders. These waived fees may not be recouped by our Adviser in the future. Our Adviser has indicated that it intends to continue to waive all or a portion of the incentive fee in order to support the current level of distributions to our stockholders; however, our Adviser is not required to issue any such waiver, either in whole or in part.

Pursuant to the Administration Agreement, we pay for our allocable portion of our Administrator’s ~~overhead~~ expenses incurred while performing ~~its obligations~~services to us, including, but not limited to, rent and the salaries and benefits expenses of our personnel, including our chief financial officer and treasurer, chief compliance officer, general counsel and secretary ~~and their respective staffs. Our general counsel and secretary~~(who also serves as ~~our~~the Administrator’s ~~president. Our~~president), and their

respective staffs. Prior to July 1, 2014, our allocable portion ~~of expenses is generally~~

was derived by multiplying ~~our~~that portion of the Administrator’s ~~total~~ expenses allocable to all funds managed by the Adviser by the percentage of our total assets at the beginning of each quarter in comparison to the total assets of all ~~companies~~funds managed by the Adviser. As approved by our ~~Adviser~~Board of Directors, effective July 1, 2014, our allocable portion of the Administrator’s expenses will be derived by multiplying our Administrator’s total expenses by the approximate percentage of time the Administrator’s employees perform services for us in relation to their time spent performing services for all companies serviced by our Administrator under ~~similar~~contractual agreements. Management believes that the current methodology of allocating the Administrator’s total expenses among all companies serviced by our Administrator is currently a more enhanced method, primarily due to the current personnel employed by the Administrator in relation to their time spent performing services for all companies serviced by our Administrator.

The preparation of our financial statements in accordance with U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles, ~~in the U.S.,~~ or GAAP, requires management to make judgments that are subjective in nature in order to make certain estimates and assumptions. Application of these accounting policies involves the exercise of judgment regarding the use of assumptions as to future uncertainties, and as a result, actual results could materially differ from these estimates. A summary of all of our significant accounting policies is provided in Note 1 to our condensed consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this Form 10-Q. Below is a summary of accounting polices involving estimates and assumptions that require complex, subjective or significant judgments in their application and that materially affect our results of operations. There were no material changes to our critical accounting policies during the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2014.

When we acquire real estate, we allocate the purchase price to (i) the acquired tangible assets and liabilities, consisting of land, building, tenant improvements and long-term debt and (ii) the identified intangible assets and liabilities, consisting of the value of above-market and below-market leases, in-place leases, unamortized lease origination costs, tenant relationships and capital lease obligations, based in each case on their fair values in accordance with ASC 805, Business Combinations. All expenses related to the acquisition are expensed as incurred.

Our Adviser estimates value using methods similar to those used by independent appraisers (e.g., discounted cash flow analysis). Factors considered by management in its analysis include an estimate of carrying costs during hypothetical expected lease-up periods, considering current market conditions and costs to execute similar leases. Our Adviser also considers information obtained about each property as a result of our pre-acquisition due diligence, marketing and leasing activities in estimating the fair value of the tangible and intangible assets and liabilities acquired. In estimating carrying costs, management also includes real estate taxes, insurance and other operating expenses and estimates of lost rentals at market rates during the hypothetical expected lease-up periods, which primarily range from 9 to 18 months, depending on specific local market conditions. Our Adviser also estimates costs to execute similar leases, including leasing commissions, legal and other related expenses to the extent that such costs are not already incurred in connection with a new lease origination as part of the transaction. Our Adviser also considers the nature and extent of our existing business relationships with the tenant, growth prospects for developing new business with the tenant, the tenant’s credit quality and management’s expectations of lease renewals (including those existing under the terms of the lease agreement), among other factors. A change in any of the assumptions above, which are very subjective, could have a material impact on our results of operations.

The allocation of the purchase price directly affects the following in our condensed consolidated financial statements:

operations. Intangible assets are generally amortized over the respective life of the leases, which normally range from 10 to 15 years. Also, we depreciate our buildings over 39 years, but do not depreciate our land. These differences in timing could have a material impact on our results of operations.

We periodically review the carrying value of each property to determine if circumstances that indicate impairment in the carrying value of the investment exist or that depreciation periods should be modified. In determining if impairment exists, our Adviser considers such factors as our tenants’ payment histories, the financial condition of our tenants, including calculating the current leverage ratios of tenants, the likelihood of lease renewal, business conditions in the industries in which our tenants operate and whether the carrying value of our real estate has decreased. If any of the factors above indicate the possibility of impairment, we prepare a projection of the undiscounted future cash flows, without interest charges, of the specific property and determine if the carrying amount of such property is recoverable. In preparing the projection of undiscounted future cash flows, we estimate the holding periods of the properties and cap rates using information that we obtain from market comparability studies and other comparable sources. If impairment were indicated, the carrying value of the property would be written down to its estimated fair value, less cost to sell, based on our best estimate of the property’s discounted future cash flows using assumptions from market participants. Any material changes to the estimates and assumptions used in this analysis could have a significant impact on our results of operations, as the changes would impact our determination of whether impairment is deemed to have occurred and the amount of impairment loss that we would recognize.

Using the methodology discussed above, we evaluated our entire portfolio as of ~~June~~September 30, 2014, for any impairment indicators and performed an impairment analysis on those select properties that had an indication of impairment. We concluded that our Roseville, Minnesota property was impaired as of March 31, 2014. We determined that the expected undiscounted cash flows, based upon a revised estimated holding period of this property, were below the current carrying value. The estimated holding period was revised after a potential tenant that we were anticipating to lease a large portion of the vacant space, during the three months ended March 31, 2014, did not execute a lease on the property. Consequently, we revised the holding period to coincide with maturity of the mortgage loan on the property in June 2014. Accordingly, we reduced the carrying value of this property to its estimated fair value, less cost to sell, and we recognized an impairment loss of ~~$14.0~~$14.2 million during the ~~three~~nine months ended ~~March~~September 30, 2014. This property is in the process of being returned to the lender in a deed in lieu transaction, which is anticipated to occur during the quarter ending December 31, 2014.

~~Our~~We had previously reported that our property located in South Hadley, Massachusetts iswas at risk ~~to become~~of becoming impaired in the future. We recently ~~extended~~received notification from the existing tenant that they will extend the lease on the property ~~in South Hadley Massachusetts~~ for ~~one year,~~two years, and it will now ~~expires~~expire in January ~~2015. There is a possibility~~2017. Because of this lease extension, we ~~may have~~are no longer at risk at having to impair this property in ~~2014 if we do not negotiate another lease extension on this building or find a replacement tenant.~~the next year.

We will continue to monitor our portfolio for any other indicators of impairment. There have been no other impairments recognized on our real estate assets since inception.

The weighted-average yield on our total portfolio, which was 9.0% as of ~~June~~September 30, 2014, is calculated by taking the annualized straight-line rents, reflected as rental income on our condensed consolidated statements of operations, of each acquisition as a percentage of the acquisition. The weighted-average yield does not account for the interest expense incurred on the mortgages placed on our properties.

A comparison of our operating results for the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2014 and 2013 is below (dollars in thousands, except per share amounts):


	For the three months ended June 30,												For the three months ended September 30,
	2014			2013			$ Change			% Change			2014			2013			$ Change			% Change
Operating revenues
Rental revenue	$	17,620		$	14,190		$	3,430			24	%	$	18,368		$	15,807		$	2,561			16	%
Interest income from mortgage note receivable														97			—			97			NM
Tenant recovery revenue		770			68			702			1032	%		549			383		��	166			43

Total operating revenues		18,390			14,258			4,132			29	%		19,014			16,190			2,824			17


Operating expenses
Depreciation and amortization		6,871			5,220			1,651			32	%		7,516			6,253			1,263			20
Property operating expenses		1,302			564			738			131	%		1,202			864			338			39
Acquisition related expenses		859			274			585			214	%		233			163			70			43
Base management fee		666			451			215			48	%		741			559			182			33
Incentive fee		1,527			933			594			64	%		1,538			1,138			400			35
Administration fee		485			367			118			32	%		260			274			(14	)		(5	)
General and administrative		490			477			13			3	%		538			377			161			43
Impairment charge														280			—			280			NM

Total operating expenses before credit to incentive fee		12,200			8,286			3,914			47	%		12,308			9,628			2,680			28


Credit to incentive fee		(957	)		(917	)		(40	)		4	%		(851	)		(989	)		138			(14	)

Total operating expenses		11,243			7,369			3,874			53	%		11,457			8,639			2,818			33


Other income (expense)
Interest expense		(6,509	)		(5,764	)		(745	)		13	%		(6,679	)		(6,573	)		(106	)		2
Distributions attributable to Series C mandatorily redeemable preferred stock		(686	)		(686	)		—			0	%		(686	)		(686	)		—			—
Gain on sale of real estate		1,240			—			1,240			NM
Other income		27			12			15			125	%		37			17			20			118

Total other expense		(5,928	)		(6,438	)		510			–8	%		(7,328	)		(7,242	)		(86	)		1


Net income		1,219			451			768			170	%		229			309			(80	)		(26	)


Distributions attributable to Series A and B preferred stock		(1,023	)		(1,023	)		—			0	%		(1,023	)		(1,023	)		—			—
Distributions attributable to senior common stock		(110	)		(69	)		(41	)		59	%		(137	)		(83	)		(54	)		65

Net loss attributable to common stockholders													$	(931	)	$	(797	)	$	(134	)		17

Net income (loss) available (attributable) to common stockholders	$	86		$	(641	)	$	727			–113	%


Net income (loss) available (attributable) to common stockholders per weighted average share of common stock - diluted	$	0.01		$	(0.05	)	$	0.06			–120	%

Net loss attributable to common stockholders per weighted average share of common stock—diluted													$	(0.05	)	$	(0.06	)	$	0.01			(17	)

FFO available to common stockholders	$	5,717		$	4,579		$	1,138			25	%	$	6,865		$	5,456		$	1,409			26

FFO per weighted average share of common stock—diluted													$	0.38		$	0.38		$	0.00			0

FFO per weighted average share of common stock - diluted	$	0.34		$	0.36		$	(0.02	)		–6	%


	For the six months ended June 30,												For the nine months ended September 30,
	2014			2013			$ Change			% Change			2014			2013			$ Change			% Change
Operating revenues
Rental revenue	$	34,205		$	27,856		$	6,349			23	%	$	52,573		$	43,663		$	8,910			20	%
Interest income from mortgage note receivable														97			—			97			NM
Tenant recovery revenue		1,321			437			884			202	%		1,870			819			1,051			128

Total operating revenues		35,526			28,293			7,233			26	%		54,540			44,482			10,058			23


Operating expenses
Depreciation and amortization		13,591			10,121			3,470			34	%		21,107			16,374			4,733			29
Property operating expenses		2,632			1,300			1,332			102	%		3,834			2,164			1,670			77
Acquisition related expenses		970			459			511			111	%		1,202			622			580			93
Base management fee		1,291			804			487			61	%		2,031			1,363			668			49
Incentive fee		2,767			1,864			903			48	%		4,305			3,001			1,304			43
Administration fee		977			730			247			34	%		1,238			1,004			234			23
General and administrative		957			866			91			11	%		1,495			1,243			252			20
Impairment charge		13,958			—			13,958			NM			14,238			—			14,238			NM

Total operating expenses before credit to incentive fee		37,143			16,144			20,999			130	%		49,450			25,771			23,679			92


Credit to incentive fee		(2,162	)		(1,502	)		(660	)		44	%		(3,013	)		(2,491	)		(522	)		21

Total operating expenses		34,981			14,642			20,339			139	%		46,437			23,280			23,157			99


Other income (expense)
Interest expense		(12,784	)		(11,425	)		(1,359	)		12	%		(19,463	)		(17,998	)		(1,465	)		8
Distributions attributable to Series C mandatorily redeemable preferred stock		(1,372	)		(1,372	)		—			0	%		(2,057	)		(2,057	)		—			—
Gain on sale of real estate		1,240			—			1,240			NM			1,240			—			1,240			NM
Other income		74			29			45			155	%		111			47			64			136

Total other expense		(12,842	)		(12,768	)		(74	)		1	%		(20,169	)		(20,008	)		(161	)		1


Net (loss) income		(12,297	)		883			(13,180	)		–1493	%		(12,066	)		1,194			(13,260	)		(1,111	)


Distributions attributable to Series A and B preferred stock		(2,047	)		(2,047	)		—			0	%		(3,070	)		(3,070	)		—			—
Distributions attributable to senior common stock		(210	)		(122	)		(88	)		72	%		(347	)		(204	)		(143	)		70


Net loss attributable to common stockholders	$	(14,554	)	$	(1,286	)	$	(13,268	)		1032	%	$	(15,483	)	$	(2,080	)	$	(13,403	)		644


Net loss attributable to common stockholders per weighted average share of common stock - diluted	$	(0.90	)	$	(0.11	)	$	(0.79	)		718	%

Net loss attributable to common stockholders per weighted average share of common stock—diluted													$	(0.93	)	$	(0.16	)	$	(0.77	)		481

FFO available to common stockholders	$	11,755		$	8,835		$	2,920			33	%	$	18,622		$	14,294		$	4,328			30

FFO per weighted average share of common stock—diluted													$	1.09		$	1.11		$	(0.02	)		(2	)

FFO per weighted average share of common stock - diluted	$	0.71		$	0.74		$	(0.03	)		–4	%

Rental revenues increased for the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2014, as compared to the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2013, because of the 10 properties acquired subsequent to ~~June~~September 30, 2013.

Interest income from mortgage note receivable increased for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014, as compared to the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013, because of interest earned on the mortgage loan issued in July 2014 that was not outstanding during 2013.

Tenant recovery revenue increased for the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2014, as compared to the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2014. This increase was primarily due to reimbursements from our tenant in our partially vacant building located in Roseville, Minnesota, coupled with operating expense recoveries from certain tenants in properties acquired over the past year that are subject to a gross lease.

Depreciation and amortization expenses increased for the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2014, as compared to the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2013, because of the 10 properties acquired subsequent to ~~June~~September 30, 2013.

Property operating expenses consist of franchise taxes, management fees, insurance, ground lease payments and overhead expenses paid on behalf of certain of our properties. Property operating expenses increased for the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2014, as compared to the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2013, primarily because of an increase in overhead (maintenance, repair and utilities) expenses at our partially vacant Roseville, Minnesota building, coupled with expenses at certain properties acquired over the past year that are subject to a gross lease.

Acquisition related expenses primarily consist of legal fees and fees incurred for third-party reports prepared in connection with potential acquisitions and our due diligence analyses related thereto. Acquisition related expenses increased for the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2014, as compared to the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2013, because of larger acquisition volume in 2014 as compared to 2013.

The base management fee increased for the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2014, as compared to the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2013, due to an increase in total common stockholders’ equity, the main component of the calculation. The calculation of the base management fee is described in detail above under “Advisory and Administration Agreements.”

The incentive fee increased for the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2014, as compared to the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2013, because of an increase in pre-incentive fee FFO. The increase in pre-incentive fee FFO was due to an increase in rental revenues from the properties acquired over the past year, which was partially offset by an increase in property operating and interest expenses during the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2014, as compared to the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2013. The impairment loss recorded during the ~~three~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2014 is not included in the calculation of the incentive fee because it is an unrealized loss.

The incentive fee credit ~~increased~~decreased for the three ~~and six~~ months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2014, as compared to the three ~~and six~~ months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2013, because of an increase in total operating revenues from the properties acquired in the past year partially offset by the amount of common dividends paid on the shares issued during the past year coupled with higher expenses at our vacant properties. The incentive fee credit increased for the nine months ended September 30, 2014, as compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2013, because of an increase in the amount of common dividends paid ~~from~~on the shares issued during the past year coupled with higher expenses at our vacant properties. The calculation of the incentive fee is described in detail above within “Advisory and Administration Agreements.”

The administration fee ~~increased~~decreased for the three ~~and six~~ months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2014, as compared to the three ~~and six~~ months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2013, as a result of a change during the three months ended September 30, 2014 in how the administration fee is allocated to us in relation to the other funds managed by our Administrator. During the three months ended September 30, 2014, the allocation of the fee was revised such that the fee is now based upon the percentage of time employees of the Administrator spend on our matters versus the prior methodology whereby we were allocated the fee based upon our total assets in relation to other funds managed by our Administrator. The administration fee increased for the nine months ended September 30, 2014, as compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2013, as a result of an increase in the amount of the ~~total expenses our Administrator incurred during the three and six months ended June 30, 2014, coupled with a larger percentage of the~~ fee ~~being~~ allocated to us ~~as a result of~~during that period; however, we anticipate our ~~higher total assets in comparison~~future administration fees to be lower under the ~~other funds managed by our Administrator during the three and six months ended June 30, 2014.~~new methodology. The calculation of the administration fee is described in detail above within “Advisory and Administration Agreements.”

General and administrative expenses increased for the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2014, as compared to the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2013, as a result of an increase in professional fees related to tax and audit services from the increase in our portfolio.

~~Impairment~~The impairment charge is a result of the impairment of our Roseville, Minnesota property ~~during the quarter ended March 31, 2014.~~ We did not recognize an impairment charge during the three and nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, ~~2014 and 2013, respectively.~~2013.

Interest expense increased for the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2014, as compared to the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2013. This increase was primarily a result of interest on the ~~$114.0~~$59.5 million of mortgage debt assumed and issued during the past 12 months, partially offset by reduced interest expense on our long-term financings from amortizing and balloon principal payments made during over the past year.

The gain on sale of real estate is a result of our property we sold located in Sterling Heights, Michigan in June 2014.

Other income increased during the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2014, as compared to the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2013, because of an increase in management fees collected from certain of our tenants.

Net ~~Income (Loss) Available (Attributable)~~Loss Attributable to Common Stockholders

Net ~~income available~~loss attributable to common stockholders increased for the three and nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2014, as compared to the three and nine months ended ~~June 30, 2013, primarily because of the gain on sale recognized during the three months ended June 30, 2014 and, to a lesser extent, due to an increase in rental income earned~~

from the 10 properties acquired during the past 12 months, partially offset by increased interest expense, property operating expenses and depreciation expense. Net loss attributable to common stockholders decreased for the six months ended June 30, 2014, as compared to the six months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2013, primarily because of the impairment loss recognized during the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2014, and, to a lesser extent, due to increased interest expense, property operating expenses and depreciation expense, partially offset by an increase in rental income earned from the 10 properties acquired during the past 12 months.

Our sources of liquidity include cash flows from operations, cash and cash equivalents, borrowings under our Line of Credit, obtaining mortgages on our unencumbered properties and issuing additional equity securities. Our available liquidity at ~~June 30,~~October 29, 2014, was ~~$22.1~~$29.8 million, including ~~$2.4~~$5.3 million in cash and cash equivalents and an available borrowing capacity of ~~$19.7~~$24.5 million under our Line of Credit.

We actively seek conservative investments that are likely to produce income to pay distributions to our stockholders. We intend to use the proceeds received from future equity raised and debt capital borrowed to continue to invest in industrial, commercial and retail real property, make mortgage loans, or pay down outstanding borrowings under our Line of Credit. Accordingly, to ensure that we are able to effectively execute our business strategy, we routinely review our liquidity requirements and continually evaluate all potential sources of liquidity. Our short-term liquidity needs include proceeds necessary to fund our distributions to stockholders, pay the debt service costs on our existing long-term mortgages and on borrowings under our Line of Credit, and fund our current operating costs. Our long-term liquidity needs include proceeds necessary to grow and maintain our portfolio of investments.

We believe that our available liquidity is sufficient to fund our distributions to stockholders, pay the debt service costs on our existing long-term mortgages and borrowings under our Line of Credit and fund our current operating costs in the near term. Additionally, to satisfy our short-term obligations, we may request credits to our management fees that are issued from our Adviser, although our Adviser is under no obligation to provide any such credits, either in whole or in part. Historically, our Adviser has provided such partial credits to our management fees on a quarterly basis. We further believe that our cash flow from operations coupled with the financing capital available to us in the future are sufficient to fund our long-term liquidity needs.

~~During the six months ended June 30,~~Thus far in 2014, we have raised net proceeds of $26.0 million in common equity in aan underwritten follow-on public offering, at a share price of ~~$17.00, we~~$17.00. We also raised net proceeds of $7.6 million of common equity under our Prior ATM Program with Jefferies, at an average share price of ~~$17.47.~~$17.47, and net proceeds of $20.5 million of common equity under our New ATM Program with Cantor at an average share price of $17.17. Furthermore, we raised ~~$0.8~~$3.9 million in net proceeds of senior common equity. We used these proceeds to acquire additional real estate and for general corporate purposes.

As of today, we have the ability to raise up to ~~$237.7~~$213.4 million of additional equity capital through the sale and issuance of securities that are registered under our universal shelf registration statement on Form S-3 (File No. 333-190931), or the Universal Shelf, in one or more future public offerings. Of the ~~$237.7~~$213.4 million of available capacity under our Universal Shelf, ~~$3.2~~$79.2 million of common stock is reserved for additional sales under our ATM Program and ~~$47.0~~$43.4 million is reserved for sales of our senior common stock.

As of ~~June~~September 30, 2014, we had mortgage notes payable in the aggregate principal amount of ~~$456.2~~$460.4 million, collateralized by a total of 7576 properties with terms at issuance ranging from 4 years to 25 years. The weighted-average interest rate on the mortgage notes payable as of ~~June~~September 30, 2014 was ~~5.36%~~5.35%.

The CMBS market has recovered; see the discussion in “Business Environment” above. Specifically, we continue to see banks and other non-bank lenders willing to issue 10-year mortgages. Consequently, we are focused on obtaining mortgages through regional banks, non-bank lenders and the CMBS market.

We have mortgage debt in the aggregate principal amount of ~~$20.8~~$18.9 million payable during the remainder of 2014 and $42.7 million payable during 2015. The 2014 principal amounts payable include both amortizing principal payments and a balloon principal payment that was due in June 2014 of $17.5 million on our property that we impaired this year. We are currently in the process ~~to return~~of returning this property to the lender in a deed in lieu transaction and we are not subject to any cross default provisions from this mortgage loan. We intend to pay the remaining 2014 debt amortization payments from operating cash flow and borrowings under our Line of Credit. We anticipate being able to refinance the mortgages that come due during 2015 with new mortgage debt.

Net cash provided by operating activities during the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2014, was ~~$11.0~~$18.7 million, as compared to net cash provided by operating activities of ~~$7.5~~$15.6 million for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2013. This increase was primarily a result of an increase in rental income received from the properties acquired in the past 12 months, partially offset by the loss of rental income from vacancies in our portfolio and property operating expenses we are responsible for at certain of our vacant properties. The majority of cash from operating activities is generated from the rental payments that we receive from our tenants. We utilize this cash to fund our property-level operating expenses and use the excess cash primarily for debt and interest payments on our mortgage notes payable, interest payments on our Line of Credit, distributions to our stockholders, management fees to our Adviser, and other entity-level expenses.

Net cash used in investing activities during the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2014, was ~~$60.9~~$88.0 million, which primarily consisted of the acquisition of ~~six~~eight properties, the funding of a mortgage loan and tenant improvements performed at certain of our properties, partially offset by proceeds received from the sale of one of our properties, as compared to net cash used in investing activities during the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2013, of ~~$38.3~~$111.0 million, which primarily consisted of the acquisition of ~~three~~five properties, ~~coupled with~~the expansion at another property and tenant improvements performed at certain of our properties.

Net cash provided by financing activities during the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2014, was ~~$43.6~~$66.1 million, which primarily consisted of proceeds from the sale of common stock and borrowings under mortgage notes payable, partially offset by distributions paid to our stockholders and principal repayments on mortgage notes payable. Net cash provided by financing activities for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2013, was ~~$29.3~~$94.4 million, which primarily consisted of proceeds from the sale of common stock ~~net borrowings on our Line of Credit~~ and proceeds from the issuance of mortgage notes payable, partially offset by the increase in distributions paid to our stockholders and principal repayments on mortgage notes payable.

In August 2013, we procured the $60.0 million Line of Credit, with KeyBank National Association (serving as a revolving lender, a letter of credit issuer and an administrative agent) and Citizens Bank of Pennsylvania as an additional lender. Comerica Bank was subsequently added as an additional lender in December 2013. On March 28, 2014, we amended our Line of Credit to extend the maturity date a year to August 2017. We also modified certain terms under the Line of Credit, including the calculation of the total

asset value and unencumbered asset value. The applicable LIBOR margins were also reduced 25 basis points at each pricing level. As a result of these modifications, the availability under our ~~line~~Line of ~~credit~~Credit increased by $1.3 million.

The Line of Credit has a letter of credit sublimit of up to $20.0 million. In addition, we may expand the Line of Credit up to a total of $75.0 million upon satisfaction of certain conditions and payment of the associated up front and arrangement fees at the time of such increase. The interest rate per annum applicable to the Line of Credit is equal to ~~the London Interbank Offered Rate, or~~ LIBOR, plus an applicable margin of up to 3.0%, depending upon our leverage. The leverage ratio used in determining the applicable margin for interest on the Line of Credit is recalculated quarterly. We are subject to an annual maintenance fee of $0.03 million per year and an unused commitment fee of 25 basis points per year, which accrues quarterly. Our ability to access this source of financing is subject to our continued ability to meet customary lending requirements, such as compliance with financial and operating covenants and our meeting certain lending limits. One such covenant requires us to limit distributions to our stockholders to 100% of our FFO, with acquisition-related costs required to be expensed under ASC 805 added back to FFO. In addition, the maximum amount we may draw under the Line of Credit is based on a percentage of the value of a pool of unencumbered properties, which must meet agreed upon eligibility standards.

As of ~~June~~September 30, 2014, there was ~~$25.7~~$45.6 million outstanding under our Line of Credit at an interest rate of approximately ~~3.2%~~2.9% and ~~$6.8~~$5.8 million outstanding under letters of credit at a weighted average interest rate of ~~3.0%~~2.75%. As of ~~July~~October 29, 2014, the maximum additional amount we could draw was ~~$14.6~~$24.5 million. Our ability to increase the availability under our Line of Credit is dependent upon us adding additional properties to the unencumbered pool, which must meet predetermined eligibility standards. We were in compliance with all covenants under the Line of Credit as of ~~June~~September 30, 2014.

The following table reflects our material contractual obligations as of ~~June~~September 30, 2014 (dollars in thousands):


	Payments Due by Period										Payments Due by Period
Contractual Obligations	Total		Less than 1 Year		1-3 Years		3-5 Years		More than 5 Years		Total		Less than 1 Year		1-3 Years		3-5 Years		More than 5 Years
Debt Obligations⁽¹⁾	$	519,528	$	25,128	$	225,477	$	66,148	$	202,775	$	543,675	$	55,606	$	240,522	$	62,126	$	185,421
Interest on Debt Obligations⁽²⁾		123,146		25,693		42,514		22,543		32,396		120,452		26,569		40,462		22,241		31,180
Operating Lease Obligations⁽³⁾		6,783		413		825		834		4,711		6,680		413		826		834		4,607
Purchase Obligations⁽⁴⁾		5,053		5,053		—		—		—		5,757		4,461		1,296		—		—

Total	$	654,510	$	56,287	$	268,816	$	89,525	$	239,882	$	676,564	$	87,049	$	283,106	$	85,201	$	221,208

We did not have any off-balance sheet arrangements as of ~~June~~September 30, 2014.

The National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts, or NAREIT, developed FFO as a relevant non-GAAP supplemental measure of operating performance of an equity REIT, to recognize that income-producing real estate historically has not depreciated on the same basis determined under GAAP. FFO, as defined by NAREIT, is net income (computed in accordance with GAAP), excluding gains or losses from sales of property and impairment losses on property, plus depreciation and amortization of real estate assets, and after adjustments for unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures.

FFO does not represent cash flows from operating activities in accordance with GAAP, which, unlike FFO, generally reflects all cash effects of transactions and other events in the determination of net income and should not be considered an alternative to net income as an indication of our performance or to cash flows from operations as a measure of liquidity or ability to make distributions. Comparison of FFO, using the NAREIT definition, to similarly titled measures for other REITs may not necessarily be meaningful due to possible differences in the application of the NAREIT definition used by such REITs.

FFO available to common stockholders is FFO adjusted to subtract distributions made to holders of preferred and senior common stock. We believe that net income available to common stockholders is the most directly comparable GAAP measure to FFO available to common stockholders.

Basic funds from operations per share, or Basic FFO per share, and diluted funds from operations per share, or Diluted FFO per share, is FFO available to common stockholders divided by the number of weighted average shares of common stock outstanding and FFO available to common stockholders divided by the number of weighted average shares of common stock outstanding on a diluted basis, respectively, during a period. We believe that FFO available to common stockholders, Basic FFO per share and Diluted FFO per share are useful to investors because they provide investors with a further context for evaluating our FFO results in the same manner that investors use net income and earnings per share, or EPS, in evaluating net income available to common stockholders. In addition, because most REITs provide FFO available to common stockholders, Basic FFO and Diluted FFO per share information to the investment community, we believe these are useful supplemental measures when comparing us to other REITs. We believe that net income is the most directly comparable GAAP measure to FFO, Basic EPS is the most directly comparable GAAP measure to Basic FFO per share, and that ~~diluted~~Diluted EPS is the most directly comparable GAAP measure to Diluted FFO per share.

The following table provides a reconciliation of our FFO available to common stockholders for the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2014 and 2013, to the most directly comparable GAAP measure, net income available to common stockholders, and a computation of basic and diluted FFO per weighted average share of common stock:


	For the three months ended June 30, (Dollars in Thousands, Except Per Share Amounts)						For the six months ended June 30, (Dollars in Thousands, Except Per Share Amounts)
	2014			2013			2014			2013			For the three months ended September 30, (Dollars in Thousands, Except Per Share Amounts)						For the nine months ended September 30, (Dollars in Thousands, Except Per Share Amounts)
													2014			2013			2014			2013
Net income (loss)	$	1,219		$	451		$	(12,297	)	$	883		$	229		$	309		$	(12,066	)	$	1,194
Less: Distributions attributable to preferred and senior common stock		(1,133	)		(1,092	)		(2,257	)		(2,169	)		(1,160	)		(1,106	)		(3,417	)		(3,274	)

Net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders	$	86		$	(641	)	$	(14,554	)	$	(1,286	)

Net loss attributable to common stockholders													$	(931	)	$	(797	)	$	(15,483	)	$	(2,080	)
Adjustments:
Add: Real estate depreciation and amortization		6,871			5,220			13,591			10,121			7,516			6,253			21,107			16,374
Add: Impairment charge		—			—			13,958			—			280			—			14,238			—
Less: Gain on sale of real estate		(1,240	)		—			(1,240	)		—			—			—			(1,240	)		—

FFO available to common stockholders	$	5,717		$	4,579		$	11,755		$	8,835		$	6,865		$	5,456		$	18,622		$	14,294

Weighted average common shares outstanding - basic		16,547,793			12,380,402			16,149,467			11,808,701
Weighted average common shares outstanding - diluted		16,894,973			12,576,161			16,482,075			11,989,454

Weighted average common shares outstanding—basic														17,739,084			14,196,423			16,685,162			12,613,354
Weighted average common shares outstanding—diluted														18,168,757			14,453,852			17,047,325			12,830,364
Basic FFO per weighted average share of common stock	$	0.35		$	0.37		$	0.73		$	0.75		$	0.39		$	0.38		$	1.12		$	1.13

Diluted FFO per weighted average share of common stock	$	0.34		$	0.36		$	0.71		$	0.74		$	0.38		$	0.38		$	1.09		$	1.11


Distributions declared per share of common stock	$	0.375		$	0.375		$	0.750		$	0.750		$	0.375		$	0.375		$	1.125		$	1.125

We are subject to market risks. Market risk includes risks that arise from changes in interest rates, foreign currency exchange rates, commodity prices, equity prices and other market changes that affect market sensitive instruments. The primary risk that we believe we are and will continue to be exposed to is interest rate risk. Certain of our leases contain escalations based on market indices, and the interest rate on our Line of Credit is variable. Although we seek to mitigate this risk by structuring such provisions of our loans and leases to contain a minimum interest rate or escalation rate, as applicable, these features do not eliminate this risk. To that end, we have entered into a derivative contract with Wells Fargo to cap interest rates for the variable rate note payable on our Champaign, Illinois property. We paid a fee of $0.03 million to cap LIBOR rates at 3.0%, to limit our exposure to interest rates on this note payable.

To illustrate the potential impact of changes in interest rates on our net income for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2014, we have performed the following analysis, which assumes that our balance sheet remains constant and that no further actions beyond a minimum interest rate or escalation rate are taken to alter our existing interest rate sensitivity.

The following table summarizes the annual impact of a 1%, 2% and 3% increase in the one month LIBOR as of ~~June~~September 30, 2014. As of ~~June~~September 30, 2014, our effective average LIBOR was ~~0.16%~~0.15%; thus, a 1%, 2% or 3% decrease could not occur.


	(Dollars in Thousands)					(Dollars in Thousands)
Interest Rate Change	Increase to Interest Expense		Net Decrease to Net Income			Increase to Interest Expense		Net Decrease to Net Income

1% Increase to LIBOR	$	343	$	(343	)	$	545	$	(545	)
2% Increase to LIBOR		686		(686	)		1,091		(1,091	)
3% Increase to LIBOR		988		(988	)		1,595		(1,595	)

As of ~~June~~September 30, 2014, the fair value of our mortgage debt outstanding was ~~$462.1~~$467.5 million. Interest rate fluctuations may affect the fair value of our debt instruments. If interest rates on our debt instruments, using rates at ~~June~~September 30, 2014, had been one percentage point higher or lower, the fair value of those debt instruments on that date would have decreased or increased by ~~$25.4~~$24.7 million and ~~$10.1~~$10.3 million, respectively.

In the future, we may be exposed to additional effects of interest rate changes, primarily as a result of our Line of Credit or long-term mortgage debt, which we use to maintain liquidity and fund expansion of our real estate investment portfolio and operations. Our interest rate risk management objectives are to limit the impact of interest rate changes on earnings and cash flows and to lower overall borrowing costs. To achieve these objectives, we will borrow primarily at fixed rates or variable rates with the lowest margins available and, in some cases, with the ability to convert variable rates to fixed rates. We may also enter into derivative financial instruments such as interest rate swaps and caps in order to mitigate the interest rate risk on a related financial instrument. We will not enter into derivative or interest rate transactions for speculative purposes.

In addition to changes in interest rates, the value of our real estate is subject to fluctuations based on changes in local and regional economic conditions and changes in the creditworthiness of lessees and borrowers, all of which may affect our ability to refinance debt, if necessary.

As of ~~June~~September 30, 2014, our management, including our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures. Based on that evaluation, management, including the chief executive officer and chief financial officer, concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of ~~June~~September 30, 2014 in providing a reasonable level of assurance that information we are required to disclose in reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in applicable SEC rules and forms, including providing a reasonable level of assurance that information required to be disclosed by us in such reports is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our chief executive officer and our chief financial officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. However, in evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures, management recognized that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated can provide only reasonable assurance of necessarily achieving the desired control objectives, and management was required to apply its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures.

There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the quarter ended ~~June~~September 30, 2014 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

We are not currently subject to any material legal proceedings, nor, to our knowledge, is any material legal proceeding threatened against us.

Our business is subject to certain risks and events that, if they occur, could adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations and the trading price of our securities. For a discussion of these risks, please refer to the section captioned “Item 1A. Risk Factors” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013, filed by us with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 18, 2014.



101.CAL***		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document

101.LAB***		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document

101.PRE***		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document

101.DEF***		XBRL Definition Linkbase

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.


MARYLAND		02-0681276
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

1521 WESTBRANCH DRIVE, SUITE 100 MCLEAN, VIRGINIA		22102
(Address of principal executive offices)		(Zip Code)



		PAGE

PART I	FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1.	Financial Statements (Unaudited)

	Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of ~~June~~September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013		3

	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2014 and 2013		4

	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2014 and 2013		5

	Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements		6

Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations		2427

Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk		4246

Item 4.	Controls and Procedures		4347

PART II	OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1.	Legal Proceedings		4448

Item 1A.	Risk Factors		4448

Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds		4448

Item 3.	Defaults Upon Senior Securities		4448

Item 4.	Mine Safety Disclosures		4448

Item 5.	Other Information		4448

Item 6.	Exhibits		4448

SIGNATURES			4751


Record Date	Payment Date	Common Stock Distributions per Share		Series A Preferred Distributions per Share		Series B Preferred Distributions per Share		Series C Preferred Distributions per Share
October 22, 2014	October 31, 2014	$	0.125	$	0.1614583	$	0.15625	$	0.1484375
November 17, 2014	November 26, 2014		0.125		0.1614583		0.15625		0.1484375
December 19, 2014	December 31, 2014		0.125		0.1614583		0.15625		0.1484375

Total		$	0.375	$	0.4843749	$	0.46875	$	0.4453125


Record Date	Payment Date	Common Stock Distributions per Share		Series A Preferred Distributions per Share		Series B Preferred Distributions per Share		Series C Preferred Distributions per Share

July 25, 2014	August 5, 2014	$	0.125	$	0.1614583	$	0.15625	$	0.1484375
August 20, 2014	August 29, 2014		0.125		0.1614583		0.15625		0.1484375
September 19, 2014	September 30, 2014		0.125		0.1614583		0.15625		0.1484375


Total		$	0.375	$	0.4843749	$	0.46875	$	0.4453125


										As of June 30, 2014
Interest Rate Cap	Notional Amount		LIBOR Cap			Effective Date		Maturity Date		Cost		Fair Value
November 26, 2013	$	8,200		3.00	%		June 30, 2014		December 1, 2016	$	31	$	7


Senior Common Stock Distributions
Payable to the Holders of Record During the Month of:	Payment Date	Distribution per Share

July	August 7, 2014	$	0.0875
August	September 8, 2014		0.0875
September	October 7, 2014		0.0875


Total		$	0.2625


Exhibit Number		Exhibit Description

3.1		Articles of Restatement of the Registrant, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (File No. 001-33097), filed April 30, 2012.

3.2		Bylaws of the Registrant, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-11 (File No. 333-106024), filed June 11, 2003.

3.3		First Amendment to Bylaws of the Registrant, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 001-33097), filed July 10, 2007.

4.1		Form of Certificate for Common Stock of the Registrant, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Pre-Effective Amendment No. 2 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-11 (File No. 333-106024), filed August 8, 2003.

4.2		Form of Certificate for 7.75% Series A Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock of the Registrant, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Registrant’s Form 8-A12G (File No. 000-50363), filed January 19, 2006.

4.3		Form of Certificate for 7.50% Series B Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock of the Registrant, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to the Registrant’s Form 8-A12B (File No. 001-33097), filed October 19, 2006.

4.4		Form of Certificate for 7.125% Series C Cumulative Term Preferred Stock of the Registrant, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.4 to the Registrant’s Form 8-A12B (File No. 001-33097), filed January 31, 2012.

11		Computation of Per Share Earnings from Operations (included in the notes to the unaudited financial statements contained in this Report).

12		Statements re: computation of ratios (filed herewith).

31.1		Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herewith).

31.2		Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herewith).

32.1		Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (furnished herewith).

32.2		Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (furnished herewith).

101.INS***		XBRL Instance Document

101.SCH***		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document


	Gladstone Commercial Corporation

Date: ~~July~~October 29, 2014	By:	/s/ Danielle Jones

		Danielle Jones
		Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer

Date: ~~July~~October 29, 2014	By:	/s/ David Gladstone

		David Gladstone
		Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of Directors


	Land		Building		Tenant Improvements		In-place Leases		Leasing Costs		Customer Relationships		Total Purchase Price

Egg Harbor Township, NJ	$	1,627	$	2,735	$	282	$	558	$	189	$	259	$	5,650
Vance, AL		457		9,721		808		1,097		678		627		13,388
Blaine, MN		1,060		9,347		1,172		1,361		694		816		14,450

	$	3,144	$	21,803	$	2,262	$	3,016	$	1,561	$	1,702	$	33,488


	Land		Building		Tenant Improvements		In-place Leases		Leasing Costs		Customer Relationships		Above Market Leases		Below Market Leases			Total Purchase Price
Egg Harbor Township, NJ	$	1,627	$	2,735	$	282	$	558	$	189	$	259	$	—	$	—		$	5,650
Vance, AL		457		9,721		808		1,097		678		627		—		—			13,388
Blaine, MN		1,060		9,347		1,172		1,361		694		816		—		—			14,450
Austin, TX		2,330		37,207		6,814		6,118		1,906		3,793		—		(1,168	)		57,000
Allen, TX		2,699		5,758		2,187		1,525		1,146		1,499		336		—			15,150

	$	8,173	$	64,768	$	11,263	$	10,659	$	4,613	$	6,994	$	336	$	(1,168	)	$	105,638

Large accelerated filer

Accelerated filer

Non-accelerated filer

¨ (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Smaller reporting company