LOGO

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

x	QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended ~~August 31,~~November 30, 2015

¨	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from to

Commission File Number 001-08399

WORTHINGTON INDUSTRIES, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)


Ohio		31-1189815
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

200 Old Wilson Bridge Road, Columbus, Ohio		43085
(Address of principal executive offices)		(Zip Code)

(614) 438-3210

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

~~(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)~~

Not applicable

(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

~~(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)~~

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

YES x NO ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).

YES x NO ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.


Large accelerated filer	x	Accelerated filer	¨
Non-accelerated filer	¨ (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)	Smaller reporting company	¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

YES ¨ NO x

APPLICABLE ONLY TO CORPORATE ISSUERS:

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the Issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date. On ~~October 1,~~December 31, 2015, the number of Common Shares, without par value, issued and outstanding was ~~64,248,529.~~63,228,138.

TABLE OF CONTENTS


Safe Harbor Statement		ii

Part I. Financial Information

Item 1.	Financial Statements (Unaudited)

	Consolidated Balance Sheets – ~~August 31,~~November 30, 2015 and May 31, 2015	1

	Consolidated Statements of Earnings – Three and Six Months Ended ~~August 31,~~November 30, 2015 and 2014	2

	Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income – Three and Six Months Ended ~~August 31,~~November 30, 2015 and 2014	3

	Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows – Three and Six Months Ended ~~August 31,~~November 30, 2015 and 2014	4

	Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements	5

Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	2023

Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	3038

Item 4.	Controls and Procedures	3038

Part II. Other Information

Item 1.	Legal Proceedings	3138

Item 1A.	Risk Factors	3138

Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	3139

Item 3.	Defaults Upon Senior Securities (Not applicable)	3239

Item 4.	Mine Safety Disclosures (Not applicable)	3239

Item 5.	Other Information (Not applicable)	3239

Item 6.	Exhibits	3240

Signatures		3441

Index to Exhibits		3542

SAFE HARBOR STATEMENT

Selected statements contained in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, including, without limitation, in “PART I – Item 2. – Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” constitute “forward-looking statements” as that term is used in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (the “Act”). Forward-looking statements reflect our current expectations, estimates or projections concerning future results or events. These statements are often identified by the use of forward-looking words or phrases such as “believe,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “may,” “could,” “intend,” “estimate,” “plan,” “foresee,” “likely,” “will,” “should” or other similar words or phrases. These forward-looking statements include, without limitation, statements relating to:

•

outlook, strategy or business plans;

•

the ability to correct performance issues at operations;

•

future or expected growth, forward momentum, performance, sales, volumes, cash flows, earnings, balance sheet strengths, debt, financial condition or other financial measures;

•

projected profitability potential, capacity, and working capital needs;

•

demand trends for us or our markets;

•

additions to product lines and opportunities to participate in new markets;

•

pricing trends for raw materials and finished goods and the impact of pricing changes;

•

anticipated capital expenditures and asset sales;

•

anticipated improvements and efficiencies in costs, operations, sales, inventory management, sourcing and the supply chain and the results thereof;

•

the ability to make acquisitions and the projected timing, results, benefits, costs, charges and expenditures related to acquisitions, newly-created joint ventures, headcount reductions and facility dispositions, shutdowns and consolidations;

•

the alignment of operations with demand;

•

the ability to operate profitably and generate cash in down markets;

•

the ability to maintain margins and capture and maintain market share and to develop or take advantage of future opportunities, customer initiatives, new businesses, new products and new markets;

•

expectations for Company and customer inventories, jobs and orders;

•

expectations for the economy and markets or improvements therein;

•

expected benefits from transformation plans, cost reduction efforts and other new initiatives;

•

expectations for increasing volatility or improving and sustainable earnings, earnings potential, margins or shareholder value;

•

effects of judicial rulings; and

•

other non-historical matters.

Because they are based on beliefs, estimates and assumptions, forward-looking statements are inherently subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those projected. Any number of factors could affect actual results, including, without limitation, those that follow:

•

the effect of national, regional and worldwide economic conditions generally and within major product markets, including a recurrent slowing economy;

•

the effect of conditions in national and worldwide financial markets;

•

lower oil prices as a factor in demand for products;

•

product demand and pricing;

•

changes in product mix, product substitution and market acceptance of our products;

•

fluctuations in the pricing, quality or availability of raw materials (particularly steel), supplies, transportation, utilities and other items required by operations;

•

effects of facility closures and the consolidation of operations;

•

the effect of financial difficulties, consolidation and other changes within the steel, automotive, construction, oil and gas, and other industries in which we participate;

•

failure to maintain appropriate levels of inventories;

•

financial difficulties (including bankruptcy filings) of original equipment manufacturers, end-users and customers, suppliers, joint venture partners and others with whom we do business;

•

the ability to realize targeted expense reductions from headcount reductions, facility closures and other cost reduction efforts;

•

the ability to realize other cost savings and operational, sales and sourcing improvements and efficiencies, and other expected benefits from transformation initiatives, on a timely basis;

•

the overall success of, and the ability to integrate, newly-acquired businesses and joint ventures, maintain and develop their customers, and achieve synergies and other expected benefits and cost savings therefrom;

•

capacity levels and efficiencies, within facilities, within major product markets and within the ~~industry~~industries as a whole;

•

the effect of disruption in the business of suppliers, customers, facilities and shipping operations due to ~~labor strikes or negotiations,~~ adverse weather, casualty events, equipment breakdowns, acts of war or terrorist activities or other causes;

•

changes in customer demand, inventories, spending patterns, product choices, and supplier choices;

•

risks associated with doing business internationally, including economic, political and social instability, foreign currency exposure and the acceptance of our products in these markets;

•

the ability to improve and maintain processes and business practices to keep pace with the economic, competitive and technological environment;

•

the outcome of adverse claims experience with respect to workers’ compensation, product recalls or product liability, casualty events or other matters;

•

deviation of actual results from estimates and/or assumptions used by us in the application of our significant accounting policies;

•

level of imports and import prices in our markets;

•

the impact of judicial rulings and governmental regulations, both in the United States and abroad, including those adopted by the United States Securities and Exchange Commission and other governmental agencies as contemplated by the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010;

•

the effect of changes to healthcare laws in the United States, which may increase our healthcare and other costs and negatively impact our operations and financial results; and

•

other risks described from time to time in our filings with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission, including those described in “PART I – Item 1A. — Risk Factors” of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended May 31, ~~2015~~2015..

We note these factors for investors as contemplated by the Act. It is impossible to predict or identify all potential risk factors. Consequently, you should not consider the foregoing list to be a complete set of all potential risks and uncertainties. Any forward-looking statements in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q are based on current information as of the date of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, and we assume no obligation to correct or update any such statements in the future, except as required by applicable law.

iii

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. – Financial Statements

WORTHINGTON INDUSTRIES, INC.

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(In thousands)

(Unaudited)


	August 31, 2015		May 31, 2015		November 30, 2015		May 31, 2015
Assets
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	18,772	$	31,067	$	27,354	$	31,067
Receivables, less allowances of $2,909 and $3,085 at August 31, 2015 and May 31, 2015, respectively		431,586		474,292
Receivables, less allowances of $3,163 and $3,085 at November 30, 2015 and May 31, 2015, respectively						407,371		474,292
Inventories:
Raw materials		195,695		181,975		177,044		181,975
Work in process		104,775		107,069		89,877		107,069
Finished products		82,329		85,931		84,232		85,931

Total inventories		382,799		374,975		351,153		374,975
Income taxes receivable		2,868		12,119		3,491		12,119
Assets held for sale		23,450		23,412		12,646		23,412
Deferred income taxes		21,731		22,034		21,356		22,034
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		53,630		54,294		48,525		54,294

Total current assets		934,836		992,193		871,896		992,193
Investments in unconsolidated affiliates		201,383		196,776		210,116		196,776
Goodwill		239,632		238,999		237,110		238,999
Other intangible assets, net of accumulated amortization of $51,831 and $47,547 at August 31, 2015 and May 31, 2015, respectively		114,799		119,117
Other intangible assets, net of accumulated amortization of $42,744 and $47,547 at November 30, 2015 and May 31, 2015, respectively						92,119		119,117
Other assets		24,500		24,867		25,676		24,867
Property, plant & equipment:
Land		15,842		16,017		14,367		16,017
Buildings and improvements		218,809		218,182		224,104		218,182
Machinery and equipment		889,290		872,986		898,384		872,986
Construction in progress		59,061		40,753		52,174		40,753

Total property, plant & equipment		1,183,002		1,147,938		1,189,029		1,147,938
Less: accumulated depreciation		652,242		634,748		664,941		634,748

Property, plant and equipment, net		530,760		513,190		524,088		513,190

Total assets	$	2,045,910	$	2,085,142	$	1,961,005	$	2,085,142


Liabilities and equity
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable	$	317,552	$	294,129	$	265,984	$	294,129
Short-term borrowings		22,039		90,550		49,538		90,550
Accrued compensation, contributions to employee benefit plans and related taxes		63,823		66,252		59,016		66,252
Dividends payable		12,712		12,862		13,293		12,862
Other accrued items		67,250		56,913		61,039		56,913
Income taxes payable		11,217		2,845		2,049		2,845
Current maturities of long-term debt		846		841		851		841

Total current liabilities		495,439		524,392		451,770		524,392
Other liabilities		56,575		58,269		63,429		58,269
Distributions in excess of investment in unconsolidated affiliate		58,728		61,585		58,214		61,585
Long-term debt		580,901		579,352		579,016		579,352
Deferred income taxes		15,376		21,495		4,802		21,495

Total liabilities		1,207,019		1,245,093		1,157,231		1,245,093
Shareholders’ equity - controlling interest		749,884		749,112		713,006		749,112
Noncontrolling interests		89,007		90,937		90,768		90,937

Total equity		838,891		840,049		803,774		840,049

Total liabilities and equity	$	2,045,910	$	2,085,142	$	1,961,005	$	2,085,142

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

WORTHINGTON INDUSTRIES, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EARNINGS

(In thousands, except per share amounts)

(Unaudited)


	Three Months Ended August 31,						Three Months Ended November 30,						Six Months Ended November 30,
	2015			2014			2015			2014			2015			2014
Net sales	$	758,147		$	862,414		$	699,816		$	871,012		$	1,457,963		$	1,733,426
Cost of goods sold		645,131			732,907			590,637			745,789			1,235,768			1,478,696

Gross margin		113,016			129,507			109,179			125,223			222,195			254,730
Selling, general and administrative expense		75,951			75,255			72,722			77,308			148,673			152,563
Impairment of long-lived assets		3,000			1,950			22,962			14,235			25,962			16,185
Restructuring and other expense		3,069			100			1,523			488			4,592			588

Operating income		30,996			52,202			11,972			33,192			42,968			85,394
Other income (expense):
Miscellaneous income (expense)		(578	)		323
Miscellaneous income, net								996			1,220			418			1,543
Interest expense		(7,854	)		(9,516	)		(7,799	)		(9,676	)		(15,653	)		(19,192	)
Equity in net income of unconsolidated affiliates		26,581			27,924			29,247			22,319			55,828			50,243

Earnings before income taxes		49,145			70,933			34,416			47,055			83,561			117,988
Income tax expense		14,708			22,113			8,800			15,600			23,508			37,713

Net earnings		34,437			48,820			25,616			31,455			60,053			80,275
Net earnings attributable to noncontrolling interests		3,027			4,652			2,375			1,993			5,402			6,645

Net earnings attributable to controlling interest	$	31,410		$	44,168		$	23,241		$	29,462		$	54,651		$	73,630


Basic
Average common shares outstanding		63,993			67,567			62,676			67,105			63,338			67,337

Earnings per share attributable to controlling interest	$	0.49		$	0.65		$	0.37		$	0.44		$	0.86		$	1.09


Diluted
Average common shares outstanding		65,729			69,738			64,527			69,181			65,015			69,780

Earnings per share attributable to controlling interest	$	0.48		$	0.63		$	0.36		$	0.43		$	0.84		$	1.06


Common shares outstanding at end of period		63,343			67,424			62,101			66,912			62,101			66,912

Cash dividends declared per share	$	0.19		$	0.18		$	0.19		$	0.18		$	0.38		$	0.36

See notes to consolidated financial ~~statements.~~statements

WORTHINGTON INDUSTRIES, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

(In thousands)

(Unaudited)


	Three Months Ended August 31,						Three Months Ended November 30,						Six Months Ended November 30,
	2015			2014			2015			2014			2015			2014
Net earnings	$	34,437		$	48,820		$	25,616		$	31,455		$	60,053		$	80,275
Other comprehensive income (loss):
Other comprehensive loss:
Foreign currency translation		1,823			(9,592	)		(9,214	)		(7,270	)		(7,391	)		(16,862	)
Pension liability adjustment, net of tax		(8	)		-			-			-			(8	)		-
Cash flow hedges, net of tax		630			961			(2,523	)		(1,881	)		(1,893	)		(920	)

Other comprehensive income (loss)		2,445			(8,631	)
Other comprehensive loss								(11,737	)		(9,151	)		(9,292	)		(17,782	)

Comprehensive income		36,882			40,189			13,879			22,304			50,761			62,493
Comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interests		2,971			3,472			1,760			1,559			4,731			5,031

Comprehensive income attributable to controlling interest	$	33,911		$	36,717		$	12,119		$	20,745		$	46,030		$	57,462

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

WORTHINGTON INDUSTRIES, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(In thousands)

(Unaudited)


	Three Months Ended August 31,						Three Months Ended November 30,						Six Months Ended November 30,
	2015			2014			2015			2014			2015			2014
Operating activities
Net earnings	$	34,437		$	48,820		$	25,616		$	31,455		$	60,053		$	80,275
Adjustments to reconcile net earnings to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization		21,440			20,367			20,547			21,200			41,987			41,567
Impairment of long-lived assets		3,000			1,950			22,962			14,235			25,962			16,185
Provision for deferred income taxes		(5,540	)		(535	)		(9,851	)		(5,492	)		(15,391	)		(6,027	)
Bad debt expense (income)		10			(203	)		(2	)		143			8			(60	)
Equity in net income of unconsolidated affiliates, net of distributions		(5,513	)		(6,990	)		(10,389	)		(813	)		(15,902	)		(7,803	)
Net loss (gain) on sale of assets		1,606			(2,830	)		(5,854	)		2,370			(4,248	)		(460	)
Stock-based compensation		3,777			4,355			3,880			4,498			7,657			8,853
Excess tax benefits - stock-based compensation		(824	)		(5,132	)		(434	)		(621	)		(1,258	)		(5,753	)
Changes in assets and liabilities, net of impact of acquisitions:
Receivables		42,629			12,752			23,474			(6,916	)		66,103			5,836
Inventories		(7,824	)		(51,217	)		31,645			16,087			23,821			(35,130	)
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		11,166			(2,872	)		17,467			(5,232	)		28,633			(8,104	)
Other assets		442			121			(3,245	)		3,095			(2,803	)		3,216
Accounts payable and accrued expenses		42,184			41,890			(72,711	)		(72,095	)		(30,527	)		(30,205	)
Other liabilities		(3,187	)		(5,991	)		7,487			(505	)		4,300			(6,496	)

Net cash provided by operating activities		137,803			54,485			50,592			1,409			188,395			55,894


Investing activities
Investment in property, plant and equipment		(38,497	)		(23,873	)		(21,995	)		(23,273	)		(60,492	)		(47,146	)
Investment in notes receivable		-			(5,000	)		-			(2,300	)		-			(7,300	)
Acquisitions, net of cash acquired		-			(36,550	)		(2,950	)		(14,543	)		(2,950	)		(51,093	)
Investments in unconsolidated affiliates		(1,687	)		(3,800	)
Distributions from (investments in) unconsolidated affiliates								(226	)		129			(1,913	)		(3,671	)
Proceeds from sale of assets and insurance		131			265			9,325			921			9,456			1,186

Net cash used by investing activities		(40,053	)		(68,958	)		(15,846	)		(39,066	)		(55,899	)		(108,024	)


Financing activities
Net proceeds from (repayments of) short-term borrowings		(68,511	)		555			27,499			(196	)		(41,012	)		359
Proceeds from long-term debt		921			-			-			20,480			921			20,480
Principal payments on long-term debt		(208	)		(302	)		(220	)		(511	)		(428	)		(813	)
Payments for issuance of common shares		(602	)		(1,020	)
Proceeds from (payments for) issuance of common shares								3,666			566			3,064			(454	)
Excess tax benefits - stock-based compensation		824			5,132			434			621			1,258			5,753
Payments to noncontrolling interest		(3,336	)		(2,867	)		(1,564	)		-			(4,900	)		(2,867	)
Repurchase of common shares		(27,582	)		(20,071	)		(43,914	)		(21,549	)		(71,496	)		(41,620	)
Dividends paid		(11,551	)		(10,112	)		(12,065	)		(12,138	)		(23,616	)		(22,250	)

Net cash used by financing activities		(110,045	)		(28,685	)		(26,164	)		(12,727	)		(136,209	)		(41,412	)


Decrease in cash and cash equivalents		(12,295	)		(43,158	)
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents								8,582			(50,384	)		(3,713	)		(93,542	)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period		31,067			190,079			18,772			146,921			31,067			190,079

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	18,772		$	146,921		$	27,354		$	96,537		$	27,354		$	96,537

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

WORTHINGTON INDUSTRIES, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

NOTE A – Basis of Presentation

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Worthington Industries, Inc. and consolidated subsidiaries (collectively, “we,” “our,” “Worthington,” or the “Company”). Investments in unconsolidated affiliates are accounted for using the equity method. Significant intercompany accounts and transactions are eliminated.

dHybrid Systems, LLC (“dHybrid”), Spartan Steel Coating, LLC (“Spartan”), TWB Company, L.L.C. (“TWB”), Worthington Arıtaş Basınçlı Kaplar Sanayi (“Worthington Aritas”), Worthington Energy Innovations, LLC (“WEI”), and Worthington Nitin Cylinders Limited (“Worthington Nitin Cylinders”) in which we own controlling interests of 79.59%, 52%, 55%, 75%, 75%, and 60%, respectively, are consolidated with the equity owned by the other joint venture members shown as noncontrolling interests in our consolidated balance sheets, and the other joint venture members’ portions of net earnings and other comprehensive income (loss) shown as net earnings or comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interests in our consolidated statements of earnings and consolidated statements of comprehensive income, respectively.

These unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”) for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and notes required by U.S. GAAP for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments, which are of a normal and recurring nature, except those which have been disclosed elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, necessary for a fair presentation of the consolidated financial statements for these interim periods, have been included. Operating results for the three and six months ended ~~August 31,~~November 30, 2015 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the fiscal year ending May 31, 2016 (“fiscal 2016”). For further information, refer to the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2015 (“fiscal 2015”) of Worthington Industries, Inc. (the “2015 Form 10-K”).

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

In May 2014, amended accounting guidance was issued that replaces most existing revenue recognition guidance under U.S. GAAP. The amended guidance requires an entity to recognize the amount of revenue to which it expects to be entitled for the transfer of promised goods or services to customers. The amended guidance is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within that reporting period. ~~Early application is not permitted.~~ We are in the process of evaluating the effect this guidance will have on our consolidated financial position and results of operations. The amended guidance permits the use of either the retrospective or cumulative effect transition method. We have not selected a transition method nor have we determined the effect of the amended guidance on our ongoing financial reporting.

In April 2015, amended accounting guidance was issued to simplify the presentation of debt issuance costs by requiring that such costs be presented in the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the carrying amount of the corresponding debt liability itself. For public business entities, the amended guidance is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2015, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Early application is permitted for financial statements that have not been issued. The revised guidance is to be applied on a retrospective basis, and entities are to comply with the applicable disclosures for a change in an accounting principle accordingly. We are in the process of evaluating the effect this guidance will have on our consolidated financial position and results of operations, and we have not determined the effect of the amended guidance on our ongoing financial reporting.

price of inventory in the ordinary course of business, less reasonably predictable costs of completion, disposal, and transportation. The amended guidance has no impact on inventory accounted for under the last-in, first-out (LIFO) or retail inventory methods. For public business entities, the amended guidance is effective prospectively for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Early application is permitted as of the beginning of an interim or annual reporting period. We are in the process of evaluating the effect this guidance will have on our consolidated financial position and results of operations, and we have not determined the effect of the amended guidance on our ongoing financial reporting.

In September 2015, amended accounting guidance was issued regarding adjustments to provisional amounts reported in conjunction with a business combination. The amended guidance requires that an acquirer in a business combination recognize adjustments to provisional amounts identified during the measurement period in the reporting period in which the adjustment amounts are determined. The amendment also requires that the acquirer record, in the same period’s financial statements, the effect on earnings of changes in depreciation, amortization, or other income effects, if any, as a result of the change, calculated as if the accounting had been completed at the acquisition date. Additionally, the amendment requires the acquirer to present separately on the face of the income statement or disclose in the notes the portion of the amount recorded in current-period earnings by line item that would have been recorded in previous reporting periods if the adjustment to the provisional amounts had been recognized as of the acquisition date. For public business entities, the amended guidance is effective prospectively for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2015, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Early application is permitted for financial statements that have not been issued. We are in the process of evaluating the effect this guidance will have on our consolidated financial position and results of operations, and we have not determined the effect of the amended guidance on our ongoing financial reporting.

In November 2015, amended accounting guidance was issued that simplifies the presentation of deferred income taxes. The amended guidance requires that all deferred income tax assets and liabilities be classified as noncurrent on a classified statement of financial position. For public business entities, the amended guidance is effective for financial statements issued for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016, including interim periods within those annual periods. Early application is permitted as of the beginning of an interim or annual reporting period, and the change may be applied either prospectively or retrospectively. We are in the process of evaluating the effect this guidance will have on our consolidated financial position and results of operations, and we have not determined the effect of the amended guidance on our ongoing financial reporting.

NOTE B – Investments in Unconsolidated Affiliates

Our investments in affiliated companies that we do not control, either through majority ownership or otherwise, are accounted for using the equity method. These include ArtiFlex Manufacturing, LLC (“ArtiFlex”) (50%), Clarkwestern Dietrich Building Systems LLC (“ClarkDietrich”) (25%), Samuel Steel Pickling Company (31.25%), Serviacero Planos, S. de R. L. de C.V. (“Serviacero”) (50%), Worthington Armstrong Venture (“WAVE”) (50%), Worthington Specialty Processing (“WSP”) (51%), and Zhejiang Nisshin Worthington Precision Specialty Steel Co., Ltd. (10%). WSP is considered to be jointly controlled and not consolidated due to substantive participating rights of the minority partner.

We received distributions from unconsolidated affiliates totaling ~~$21,068,000~~$39,926,000 during the ~~three~~six months ended ~~August 31,~~November 30, 2015. We have received cumulative distributions from WAVE in excess of our investment balance totaling ~~$58,728,000~~$58,214,000 at ~~August 31,~~November 30, 2015. In accordance with the applicable accounting guidance, these excess distributions are reclassified to the liabilities section of our consolidated balance sheet. We will continue to record our equity in the net income of WAVE as a debit to the investment account, and if it becomes positive, it will again be shown as an asset on our consolidated balance sheet. If it becomes obvious that any excess distribution may not be returned (upon joint venture liquidation or otherwise), we will recognize any balance classified as a liability as income immediately.

We use the “cumulative earnings” approach for determining cash flow presentation of distributions from our unconsolidated joint ventures. Distributions received are included in our consolidated statements of cash flows as operating activities, unless the cumulative distributions exceed our portion of the cumulative equity in the net earnings of the joint venture, in which case the excess distributions are deemed to be returns of the investment and are classified as investing activities in our consolidated statements of cash flows.

Combined financial information for our unconsolidated affiliates is summarized as follows:


(in thousands)	August 31, 2015		May 31, 2015		November 30, 2015		May 31, 2015
Cash	$	96,400	$	101,011	$	95,214	$	101,011
Receivable from member (1)		10,213		11,092		8,383		11,092
Other current assets		477,072		491,507		467,747		491,507
Noncurrent assets		331,811		318,939		347,783		318,939

Total assets	$	915,496	$	922,549	$	919,127	$	922,549

Current liabilities	$	141,720	$	184,028	$	130,169	$	184,028
Short-term borrowings		25,483		-		15,503		-
Current maturities of long-term debt		4,460		4,489		4,156		4,489
Long-term debt		270,771		272,861		270,451		272,861
Other noncurrent liabilities		20,205		20,471		19,488		20,471
Equity		452,857		440,700		479,360		440,700

Total liabilities and equity	$	915,496	$	922,549	$	919,127	$	922,549


	Three Months Ended August 31,
(in thousands)	2015		2014
Net sales	$	404,463	$	392,550
Gross margin		89,018		88,751
Operating income		61,246		63,479
Depreciation and amortization		8,097		9,122
Interest expense		2,159		2,162
Income tax expense		2,560		2,753
Net earnings		62,926		59,440


	Three Months Ended November 30,					Six Months Ended November 30,
(in thousands)	2015		2014			2015		2014
Net sales	$	389,185	$	388,712		$	793,648	$	781,262
Gross margin		84,767		76,193			173,785		164,945
Operating income		55,810		49,864			117,057		113,343
Depreciation and amortization		8,068		8,983			16,165		18,105
Interest expense		2,136		2,173			4,295		4,335
Other income (expense) (2)		18,663		(59	)		23,564		(129	)
Income tax expense		2,164	��	2,799			4,723		5,552
Net earnings		71,144		44,490			134,070		103,930

(1)	Represents cash owed from a joint venture partner as a result of centralized cash management.

(2)	The increase in other income as compared to the comparable period in the prior year is primarily attributable to the impact of ClarkDietrich’s legal settlement related to successful disparagement litigation against several competitors in an industry trade association.

NOTE C – Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

We review the carrying value of our long-lived assets, including intangible assets with finite useful lives, for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of an asset or asset group may not be recoverable.

Impairment testing of long-lived assets with definite useful lives involves a comparison of the sum of the undiscounted future cash flows of the asset or asset group to its respective carrying amount. If the sum of the undiscounted future cash flows exceeds the carrying amount, then no impairment exists. If the carrying amount exceeds the sum of the undiscounted future cash flows, then a second step is performed to determine the amount of impairment, which would be recorded as an impairment charge in our consolidated ~~statements~~statement of earnings.

~~On March 24, 2015, the Company announced its decision to close its Engineered Cabs facility in Florence, South Carolina.~~ During the first quarter of fiscal 2016, management finalized its plan to close the Engineered Cabs facility in Florence, South Carolina, and transfer the majority of the business to ~~its~~the Engineered Cabs facility in Greeneville, Tennessee. ~~Certain~~Under the plan, certain machinery and equipment will ~~be transferred~~transfer to the Greeneville facility to support the higher volume requirements and the remaining long-lived assets will be liquidated. ~~For the assets to be liquidated, this represents a change in intended use.~~ As a result of these developments, management ~~evaluated~~reevaluated the recoverability of ~~these assets~~the asset group and determined that long-lived assets with a carrying value of $4,059,000 were ~~no longer recoverable and were in fact~~ impaired. As a result, these long-lived assets were written down to their estimated fair value of $1,059,000 resulting in an impairment charge of $3,000,000 during the ~~three~~six months ended ~~August 31,~~November 30, 2015. The Company ceased production at the Florence facility on September 30, 2015.

As a result of the ~~substantial fall~~decline in oil prices and resulting reduced demand for products, management determined that an impairment indicator was present for the long-lived assets ~~related to~~of its ~~oil~~facilities in the Oil & Gas Equipment business within Pressure Cylinders. The Company had tested the four asset groups in its Oil & Gas Equipment business for impairment during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2015 and ~~gas equipment business~~again in ~~Pressure Cylinders might be impaired. However,~~the first quarter of fiscal 2016. In each of these tests, the Company’s estimate of the undiscounted future cash flows for each ~~of its five oil and gas equipment facilities~~asset group indicated that the carrying amounts were expected to be ~~recovered. The~~recovered as of those measurement dates.

During the second quarter of fiscal 2016, the continued decline of oil prices further reduced the demand for our Oil & Gas Equipment products, causing a significant decrease in the Company’s long-term cash flow projections of the business. Based on these revised cash flow projections, the Company determined that two of the asset groups with a total carrying amount of $59,895,000 were impaired and wrote them down to their estimated ~~undiscounted~~fair value of $36,933,000. Fair value was based on expected future cash flows ~~for each plant were significantly higher than their respective carrying values except~~using Level 3 inputs under Accounting Standard Codification (“ASC”) 820. The cash flows are those expected to be generated by market participants, discounted at a 13% discount rate to account for the ~~Garden City, Kansas, location, which had total long-lived assets~~risks inherent in those cash flow projections. Because of ~~$36,687,000 at August 31, 2015. The estimated undiscounted future cash flows for this location exceeded book value by less than 5%. It~~deteriorating market conditions (i.e. rising interest rates and lower marketplace demand), it is reasonably possible that ~~in the future the~~our estimate of ~~undiscounted~~discounted cash flows may change resulting in the need to ~~write down these~~perform additional impairment testing.

As a result of the impairment of the Oil & Gas Equipment assets noted above, the Company also performed an impairment review of the goodwill of the Pressure Cylinders reporting unit during the second quarter of fiscal 2016. The Company first reviewed the reporting unit structure and determined that it was no longer appropriate to aggregate the Oil & Gas Equipment component with the rest of the Pressure Cylinders components for purposes of goodwill impairment testing. This determination was driven by changes in the economic characteristics of the Oil & Gas Equipment business as a result of sustained low oil prices, which now indicate that the risk profile and prospects for growth and profitability of the Oil & Gas Equipment component are no longer similar to the other components of our Pressure Cylinders businesses. In accordance with the applicable accounting guidance, the Company allocated a portion of Pressure Cylinders goodwill totaling $25,982,000 to the Oil & Gas Equipment reporting unit using a relative fair ~~value.~~value approach. A subsequent comparison of the fair values of the Oil & Gas Equipment and Pressure Cylinders reporting units, determined using discounted cash flows, to their respective carrying values indicated that a step 2 calculation to quantify a potential impairment was not required. The key assumptions that drive the fair value calculations are projected cash flows and the discount rate. Prior to the allocation of goodwill, the Company tested the goodwill of the old Pressure Cylinders reporting unit for impairment and determined that fair value exceeded carrying value by a significant amount.

NOTE D – Restructuring and Other Expense

We consider restructuring activities to be programs whereby we fundamentally change our operations such as closing and consolidating manufacturing facilities, moving manufacturing of a product to another location, and employee severance (including rationalizing headcount or other significant changes in personnel).

A progression of the liabilities associated with our restructuring activities, combined with a reconciliation to the restructuring and other expense financial statement caption in our consolidated statement of earnings for the ~~three~~six months ended ~~August 31,~~November 30, 2015 is summarized as follows:


(in thousands)	Beginning Balance		Expense		Payments			Adjustments			Ending Balance		Beginning Balance		Expense			Payments			Adjustments			Ending Balance
Early retirement and severance	$	2,170	$	3,030	$	(686	)	$	(15	)	$	4,499	$	2,170	$	4,247		$	(3,244	)	$	(157	)	$	3,016
Facility exit and other costs		371		39		(53	)		-			357		371		4,767			(4,171	)		(11	)		956

													$	2,541		9,014		$	(7,415	)	$	(168	)	$	3,972

Net gain on sale of assets																(4,422	)

Restructuring and other expense	$	2,541	$	3,069	$	(739	)	$	(15	)	$	4,856			$	4,592

~~Severance expense in~~During fiscal 2016, the ~~current year consisted primarily of $1,891,000~~following activities were taken related to the ~~pending~~Company’s restructuring activities:

In connection with the closure of the Engineered Cabs facility in Florence, South Carolina, the Company recognized severance expense of $2,343,000 and ~~$690,000~~facility exit costs of $300,000.

The Company recognized severance expense of $643,000 related to workforce reductions in our ~~oil and gas equipment~~Oil & Gas Equipment business within Pressure Cylinders announced on September 22, 2015.

In connection with the closure of the Company’s stainless steel business, Precision Specialty Metals, Inc. (“PSM”), the Company recognized $4,296,000 of facility exit costs and severance expense of $1,000,000.

In connection with the pending closure of the steel packaging facility in York, Pennsylvania, the Company recognized severance expense of $416,000.

The Company sold the remaining fixed assets of its legacy Baltimore steel processing facility at a gain of $2,938,000. The Company also recorded a $240,000 credit to severance expense and recognized facility exit costs of $101,000 during fiscal 2016 related to this matter.

The Company sold the remaining land and building of its legacy metal framing business at a gain of $1,484,000.

The Company incurred severance expense and facility costs totaling $85,000 and $70,000, respectively, related to other non-significant restructuring activities.

The total liability as of ~~August 31,~~November 30, 2015 is expected to be paid in the next twelve months.

NOTE E – Contingent Liabilities and Commitments

We are defendants in certain legal actions. In the opinion of management, the outcome of these actions, which is not clearly determinable at the present time, would not significantly affect our consolidated financial position or future results of operations. We believe that environmental issues will not have a material effect on our capital expenditures, consolidated financial position or future results of operations.

NOTE F – Guarantees

We do not have guarantees that we believe are reasonably likely to have a material current or future effect on our consolidated financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources. However, as of ~~August 31,~~November 30, 2015, we were party to an operating lease for an aircraft in which we have guaranteed a residual value at the termination of the lease. The maximum obligation under the terms of this guarantee was approximately ~~$11,433,000~~$11,128,000 at ~~August 31,~~November 30, 2015. We have also guaranteed the repayment of a term loan entered into by our unconsolidated affiliate, ArtiFlex, which had ~~$1,250,000~~$833,000 outstanding at August 31, 2015. We also have in place approximately $16,189,000 of outstanding letters of credit. These letters of credit are issued to third-party service providers and had no amounts drawn against them at August 31,November 30, 2015. Based on current facts and circumstances, we have estimated the likelihood of payment pursuant to these guarantees, and determined that the fair value of our obligation under each guarantee based on those likely outcomes is not material and, therefore, no amounts have been recognized in our consolidated financial statements.

NOTE G – Debt and Receivables Securitization

We maintain a $500,000,000 multi-year revolving credit facility (the “Credit Facility”) with a group of lenders that matures in April 2020. Borrowings under the Credit Facility have maturities of less than one year. However, we can extend the term of amounts borrowed by renewing these borrowings for the term of the Credit Facility. We have the option to borrow at rates equal to an applicable margin over the LIBOR, Prime or Fed Funds rates. The applicable margin is determined by our credit rating. The applicable interest rate at ~~August 31,~~November 30, 2015 was ~~1.257%~~1.301%. Borrowings outstanding under the Credit Facility totaled ~~$18,694,000~~$25,191,000 at ~~August 31,~~November 30, 2015, leaving ~~$481,306,000~~$474,809,000 available for future use.

We also maintain a $100,000,000 revolving trade accounts receivable securitization facility (the “AR Facility”) which expires in January 2018. The AR Facility has been available throughout fiscal 2016 to date, and was available throughout fiscal 2015. Pursuant to the terms of the AR Facility, certain of our subsidiaries sell their accounts receivable without recourse, on a revolving basis, to Worthington Receivables Corporation (“WRC”), a wholly-owned, consolidated, bankruptcy-remote subsidiary. In turn, WRC may sell without recourse, on a revolving basis, up to $100,000,000 of undivided ownership interests in this pool of accounts receivable to a multi-seller, asset-backed commercial paper conduit (the “Conduit”). Purchases by the Conduit are financed with the sale of A1/P1 commercial paper. We retain an undivided interest in this pool and are subject to risk of loss based on the collectability of the receivables from this retained interest. Because the amount eligible to be sold excludes receivables more than 90 days past due, receivables offset by an allowance for doubtful accounts due to bankruptcy or other cause, concentrations over certain limits with specific customers and certain reserve amounts, we believe additional risk of loss is minimal. The book value of the retained portion of the pool of accounts receivable approximates fair value. As of ~~August 31,~~November 30, 2015, nothe pool of eligible accounts receivable exceeded the $100,000,000 limit, and $20,000,000 of undivided ~~ownership~~ interests in this pool of accounts receivable had been sold.

The remaining balance of short-term borrowings at ~~August 31,~~November 30, 2015 consisted of ~~$1,249,000~~an aggregate of $2,257,000 outstanding under various credit facilities maintained by our consolidated affiliate, Worthington Aritas, and ~~$2,096,000~~$2,090,000 outstanding under a ~~$9,500,000~~ credit facility maintained by our consolidated affiliate, Worthington Nitin Cylinders. Borrowings outstanding under the Nitin credit facility are currently in default; however, the lender has not called the note and the Company has settled its portion of the obligation.

We also have stand-by letters of credit totaling $15,216,000 outstanding as of November 30, 2015. These letters of credit are issued to third-party service providers and had no amounts drawn against them at November 30, 2015.

NOTE H – Comprehensive Income (Loss)

The following table summarizes the tax effects on each component of other comprehensive ~~income (loss)~~loss for the three months ended ~~August 31:~~November 30:


	2015									2014									2015								2014
	Before-Tax			Tax			Net-of-Tax			Before-Tax			Tax			Net-of-Tax			Before-Tax			Tax		Net-of-Tax			Before-Tax			Tax		Net-of-Tax
(in thousands)
Foreign currency translation	$	1,823		$	-		$	1,823		$	(9,592	)	$	-		$	(9,592	)	$	(9,214	)	$	-	$	(9,214	)	$	(7,270	)	$	-	$	(7,270	)
Pension liability adjustment		(8	)		-			(8	)		-			-			-			-			-		-			-			-		-
Cash flow hedges		1,238			(608	)		630			1,543			(582	)		961			(3,805	)		1,282		(2,523	)		(2,973	)		1,092		(1,881	)

Other comprehensive income (loss )	$	3,053		$	(608	)	$	2,445		$	(8,049	)	$	(582	)	$	(8,631	)	$	(13,019	)	$	1,282	$	(11,737	)	$	(10,243	)	$	1,092	$	(9,151	)

The following table summarizes the tax effects on each component of other comprehensive loss for the six months ended November 30:


	2015								2014
	Before-Tax			Tax		Net-of-Tax			Before-Tax			Tax		Net-of-Tax
(in thousands)
Foreign currency translation	$	(7,391	)	$	-	$	(7,391	)	$	(16,862	)	$	-	$	(16,862	)
Pension liability adjustment		(8	)		-		(8	)		-			-		-
Cash flow hedges		(2,567	)		674		(1,893	)		(1,430	)		510		(920	)

Other comprehensive income (loss)	$	(9,966	)	$	674	$	(9,292	)	$	(18,292	)	$	510	$	(17,782	)

NOTE I – Changes in Equity

The following table provides a summary of the changes in total equity, shareholders’ equity attributable to controlling interest, and equity attributable to noncontrolling interests for the ~~three~~six months ended ~~August 31,~~November 30, 2015:


	Controlling Interest																		Controlling Interest
(in thousands)	Additional Paid-in Capital			Cumulative Other Comprehensive Income (Loss), Net of Tax			Retained Earnings			Total			Non- controlling Interests			Total			Additional Paid-in Capital			Cumulative Other Comprehensive Loss, Net of Tax			Retained Earnings			Total			Non- controlling Interests			Total
Balance at May 31, 2015	$	289,078		$	(50,704	)	$	510,738		$	749,112		$	90,937		$	840,049		$	289,078		$	(50,704	)	$	510,738		$	749,112		$	90,937		$	840,049
Net earnings		-			-			31,410			31,410			3,027			34,437			-			-			54,651			54,651			5,402			60,053
Other comprehensive income (loss)		-			2,501			-			2,501			(56	)		2,445
Other comprehensive loss																				-			(8,621	)		-			(8,621	)		(671	)		(9,292	)
Common shares issued, net of withholding tax		(602	)		-			-			(602	)		-			(602	)		3,064			-			-			3,064			-			3,064
Common shares in NQ plans		550			-			-			550			-			550			854			-			-			854			-			854
Stock-based compensation		5,965			-			-			5,965			-			5,965			9,636			-			-			9,636			-			9,636
Purchases and retirement of common shares		(4,680	)		-			(22,902	)		(27,582	)		-			(27,582	)		(11,580	)		-			(59,916	)		(71,496	)		-			(71,496	)
Cash dividends declared		-			-			(11,470	)		(11,470	)		-			(11,470	)		-			-			(24,194	)		(24,194	)		-			(24,194	)
Payments to noncontrolling interest		-			-			-			-			(4,901	)		(4,901	)		-			-			-			-			(4,900	)		(4,900	)

Balance at August 31, 2015	$	290,311		$	(48,203	)	$	507,776		$	749,884		$	89,007		$	838,891
Balance at November 30, 2015																			$	291,052		$	(59,325	)	$	481,279		$	713,006		$	90,768		$	803,774

The components of the changes in other comprehensive loss were as follows:


	Foreign Currency Translation			Pension Liability Adjustment			Cash Flow Hedges			Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss			Foreign Currency Translation			Pension Liability Adjustment			Cash Flow Hedges			Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss
(in thousands)
Balance as of May 31, 2015	$	(20,717	)	$	(15,003	)	$	(14,984	)	$	(50,704	)	$	(20,717	)	$	(15,003	)	$	(14,984	)	$	(50,704	)
Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications		1,879			(8	)		(8,092	)		(6,221	)		(6,720	)		(8	)		(18,503	)		(25,231	)
Reclassification adjustments to income (a)		-			-			9,330			9,330			-			-			15,936			15,936
Income taxes		-			-			(608	)		(608	)		-			-			674			674

Balance as of August 31, 2015	$	(18,838	)	$	(15,011	)	$	(14,354	)	$	(48,203	)
Balance as of November 30, 2015													$	(27,437	)	$	(15,011	)	$	(16,877	)	$	(59,325	)

(a)	The statement of earnings classification of amounts reclassified to income for cash flow hedges is disclosed in “NOTE N – Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities.”

NOTE J – Stock-Based Compensation

Non-Qualified Stock Options

During the ~~three~~six months ended ~~August 31,~~November 30, 2015, we granted non-qualified stock options covering a total of 153,500 common shares under our stock-based compensation plans. The option price of $30.92 per share was equal to the market price of the underlying common shares at the grant date. The fair value of these stock options, based on the Black-Scholes option-pricing model, calculated at the grant date, was $9.55 per share. The calculated pre-tax stock-based compensation expense for these stock options, after an estimate for forfeitures, is $1,305,000 and will be recognized on a straight-line basis over the three-year vesting period. The following assumptions were used to value these stock options:


Dividend yield	2.33	%
Expected volatility	38.40	%
Risk-free interest rate	1.98	%
Expected term (years)	6.0

Expected volatility is based on the historical volatility of our common shares and the risk-free interest rate is based on the United States Treasury strip rate for the expected term of the stock options. The expected term was developed using historical exercise experience.

Service-Based Restricted Common Shares

During the ~~three~~six months ended ~~August 31,~~November 30, 2015, we granted an aggregate of ~~148,850~~204,550 service-based restricted common shares under our stock-based compensation plans. The fair value of these restricted common shares was equal to the closing market price of the underlying common shares on the date of grant, or ~~$30.92~~$29.32 per share. The calculated pre-tax stock-based compensation expense for these restricted common shares, after an estimate for forfeitures, is ~~$4,096,000~~$5,446,000 and will be recognized on a straight-line basis over the three-year service-based vesting period.

Performance Share Awards

We have awarded performance shares to certain key employees that are earned based on the level of achievement with respect to corporate targets for cumulative corporate economic value added, earnings per share growth and, in the case of business unit executives, business unit operating income targets for the three-year periods ending May 31, 2016, 2017 and 2018. These performance share awards will be paid, to the extent earned, in common shares of the Company in the fiscal quarter following the end of the applicable three-year performance period. The fair values of our performance shares are determined by the closing market prices of the underlying common shares at their respective grant dates and the pre-tax stock-based compensation expense is based on our periodic assessment of the probability of the targets being achieved and our estimate of the number of common shares that will ultimately be issued. During the ~~three~~six months ended ~~August 31,~~November 30, 2015, we granted performance share awards covering an aggregate of ~~94,700~~92,096 common shares (at target levels). The calculated pre-tax stock-based compensation expense for these performance shares is ~~$2,852,000~~$2,774,000 and will be recognized over the three-year performance period.

NOTE K – Income Taxes

Income tax expense for the ~~three~~six months ended ~~August 31,~~November 30, 2015 and ~~August 31,~~November 30, 2014 reflected estimated annual effective income tax rates of ~~31.8%~~31.2% and ~~32.8%~~33.5%, respectively. The annual effective income tax rates exclude any impact from the inclusion of net earnings attributable to noncontrolling interests in our consolidated statements of earnings. Net earnings attributable to noncontrolling interests ~~are~~is primarily a result of our Spartan, Worthington Nitin Cylinders, Worthington Aritas, and TWB consolidated joint ventures. The earnings attributable to the noncontrolling ~~interests~~interest in Spartan and TWB’s U.S. operations do not generate tax expense to Worthington since the investors in Spartan and TWB’s U.S. operations are taxed directly based on the earnings attributable to them. The tax expense of Worthington Aritas and Worthington Nitin Cylinders ~~both~~(both foreign ~~corporations,~~corporations), and TWB’s wholly-owned foreign corporations, is reported in our consolidated tax expense. Management is required to estimate the annual effective income tax rate based upon its forecast of annual pre-tax income for domestic and foreign operations. Our actual effective income tax rate for fiscal 2016 could be materially different from the forecasted rate as of ~~August 31,~~November 30, 2015.

NOTE L – Earnings Per Share

The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted earnings per share for the three and six months ended ~~August 31,~~November 30, 2015 and 2014:


	Three Months Ended August 31,				Three Months Ended November 30,				Six Months Ended November 30,
(in thousands, except per share amounts)	2015		2014		2015		2014		2015		2014
Numerator (basic & diluted):
Net earnings attributable to controlling interest – income available to common shareholders	$	31,410	$	44,168	$	23,241	$	29,462	$	54,651	$	73,630
Denominator:
Denominator for basic earnings per share attributable to controlling interest – weighted average common shares		63,993		67,567		62,676		67,105		63,338		67,337
Effect of dilutive securities		1,736		2,171		1,851		2,076		1,677		2,443

Denominator for diluted earnings per share attributable to controlling interest – adjusted weighted average common shares		65,729		69,738		64,527		69,181		65,015		69,780

Basic earnings per share attributable to controlling interest	$	0.49	$	0.65	$	0.37	$	0.44	$	0.86	$	1.09
Diluted earnings per share attributable to controlling interest	$	0.48	$	0.63	$	0.36	$	0.43	$	0.84	$	1.06

Stock options ~~covering 318,904~~ and ~~87,976~~restricted common shares covering 367,094 and 147,859 common shares for the three months ended November 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively, and 346,557 and 113,744 common shares for the six months ended November 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively, have been excluded from the computation of diluted earnings per share ~~for the three months ended August 31, 2015 and August 31, 2014, respectively,~~ because the effect would have been anti-dilutive as the exercise price of the stock options was greater than the average market price of the common shares during the period.

NOTE M – Segment Operations

Summarized financial information for our reportable segments is shown in the following table:


	Three Months Ended August 31,						Three Months Ended November 30,						Six Months Ended November 30,
(in thousands)	2015			2014			2015			2014			2015			2014
Net sales
Steel Processing	$	490,800		$	552,331		$	467,812		$	552,756		$	958,612		$	1,105,087
Pressure Cylinders		224,394			248,959			201,173			252,744			425,567			501,703
Engineered Cabs		38,617			49,554			28,699			51,540			67,316			101,094
Other		4,336			11,570			2,132			13,972			6,468			25,542

Total net sales	$	758,147		$	862,414		$	699,816		$	871,012		$	1,457,963		$	1,733,426

Operating income (loss)
Steel Processing	$	23,638		$	35,869		$	26,642		$	33,877		$	50,280		$	69,746
Pressure Cylinders		16,819			19,606			(10,309	)		9,580			6,510			29,186
Engineered Cabs		(9,291	)		(2,145	)		(4,290	)		(5,609	)		(13,581	)		(7,754	)
Other		(170	)		(1,128	)		(71	)		(4,656	)		(241	)		(5,784	)

Total operating income	$	30,996		$	52,202		$	11,972		$	33,192		$	42,968		$	85,394

Impairment of long-lived assets
Steel Processing	$	-		$	1,950		$	-		$	1,100		$	-		$	3,050
Pressure Cylinders		-			-			22,962			9,567			22,962			9,567
Engineered Cabs		3,000			-			-			2,389			3,000			2,389
Other		-			-			-			1,179			-			1,179

Total impairment of long-lived assets	$	3,000		$	1,950		$	22,962		$	14,235		$	25,962		$	16,185

Restructuring and other expense (income)
Steel Processing	$	462		$	(30	)	$	2,258		$	-		$	2,720		$	(30	)
Pressure Cylinders		731			23			(16	)		405			715			428
Engineered Cabs		1,878			-			765			-			2,643			-
Other		(2	)		107			(1,484	)		83			(1,486	)		190

Total restructuring and other expense	$	3,069		$	100		$	1,523		$	488		$	4,592		$	588


(in thousands)	August 31, 2015			May 31, 2015			November 30, 2015			May 31, 2015
Total assets
Steel Processing	$	818,834		$	829,116		$	768,791		$	829,116
Pressure Cylinders		791,752			804,799			750,809			804,799
Engineered Cabs		89,018			94,506			80,451			94,506
Other		346,306			356,721			360,954			356,721

Total assets	$	2,045,910		$	2,085,142		$	1,961,005		$	2,085,142

NOTE N – Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities

We utilize derivative ~~financial~~ instruments to manage exposure to certain risks related to our ongoing operations. The primary risks managed through the use of derivative instruments include interest rate risk, currency exchange risk and commodity price risk. While certain of our derivative instruments are designated as hedging instruments, we also enter into derivative instruments that are designed to hedge a risk, but are not designated as hedging instruments and therefore do not qualify for hedge accounting. These derivative instruments are adjusted to current fair value through earnings at the end of each period.

Interest Rate Risk Management – We are exposed to the impact of interest rate changes. Our objective is to manage the impact of interest rate changes on cash flows and the market value of our borrowings. We utilize a mix of debt maturities along with both fixed-rate and variable-rate debt to manage changes in interest rates. In addition, we enter into interest rate swaps to further manage our exposure to interest rate variations related to our borrowings and to lower our overall borrowing costs.

Currency Exchange Risk Management – We conduct business in several major international currencies and are therefore subject to risks associated with changing foreign exchange rates. We enter into various contracts that change in value as foreign exchange rates change to manage this exposure. Such contracts limit exposure to both favorable and unfavorable currency fluctuations. The translation of foreign currencies into United States dollars also subjects us to exposure related to fluctuating exchange rates; however, derivative instruments are not used to manage this risk.

Commodity Price Risk Management – We are exposed to changes in the price of certain commodities, including steel, natural gas, zinc and other raw materials, and our utility requirements. Our objective is to reduce earnings and cash flow volatility associated with forecasted purchases and sales of these commodities to allow management to focus its attention on business operations. Accordingly, we enter into derivative contracts to manage the associated price risk.

We are exposed to counterparty credit risk on all of our derivative instruments. Accordingly, we have established and maintain strict counterparty credit guidelines and enter into derivative instruments only with major financial institutions. We have credit support agreements in place with certain counterparties to limit our credit exposure. These agreements require either party to post cash collateral if its cumulative market position exceeds a predefined liability threshold. At ~~August 31,~~November 30, 2015, we had posted total cash collateral of ~~$2,711,000~~$9,670,000 to our margin accounts. Amounts posted to the margin accounts accrue interest at market rates and are required to be refunded in the period in which the cumulative market position falls below the required threshold. We do not have significant exposure to any one counterparty and management believes the risk of loss is remote and, in any event, would not be material.

Refer to “Note OQ – Fair ~~Value”~~Value Measurements” for additional information regarding the accounting treatment for our derivative instruments, as well as how fair value is determined.

The following table summarizes the fair value of our derivative instruments and the respective financial statement caption in which they were recorded in our consolidated balance sheet at ~~August 31,~~November 30, 2015:


	Asset Derivatives			Liability Derivatives			Asset Derivatives			Liability Derivatives
(in thousands)	Balance Sheet Location	Fair Value		Balance Sheet Location	Fair Value		Balance Sheet Location	Fair Value		Balance Sheet Location	Fair Value
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments:
Commodity contracts	Receivables	$	-	Accounts payable	$	16,557	Receivables	$	-	Accounts payable	$	16,349
	Other assets		-	Other liabilities		424	Other assets		-	Other liabilities		974

			-			16,981			-			17,323
Interest rate contracts	Receivables		-	Accounts payable		81	Receivables		-	Accounts payable		124
	Other assets		-	Other liabilities		79	Other assets		-	Other liabilities		238

			-			160			-			362

Totals		$	-		$	17,141		$	-		$	17,685

Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments:
Commodity contracts	Receivables	$	-	Accounts payable	$	4,852	Receivables	$	-	Accounts payable	$	6,998
	Other assets		-	Other liabilities		119	Other assets		-	Other liabilities		285

			-			4,971			-			7,283

Foreign exchange contracts	Receivables		11	Accounts payable		-	Receivables		5	Accounts payable		-

			11			-			5			-

Totals		$	11		$	4,971		$	5		$	7,283

Total Derivative Instruments		$	11		$	22,112		$	5		$	24,968

The amounts in the table above reflect the fair value of the Company’s derivative contracts on a net basis. Had these amounts been recognized on a gross basis, the impact would have been a ~~$310,000 decrease~~$57,000 increase in receivables with a corresponding ~~decrease~~increase in accounts payable.

The following table summarizes the fair value of our derivative instruments and the ~~respective line~~financial statement caption in which they were recorded in the consolidated balance sheet at May 31, 2015:


	Asset Derivatives					Liability Derivatives				Asset Derivatives			Liability Derivatives
(in thousands)	Balance Sheet Location			Fair Value		Balance Sheet Location		Fair Value		Balance Sheet Location	Fair Value		Balance Sheet Location		Fair Value
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments:			��
Commodity contracts		Receivables		$	-		Accounts payable	$	17,241	Receivables	$	-		Accounts payable	$	17,241
		Other assets			-		Other liabilities		592	Other assets		-		Other liabilities		592

					-				17,833			-				17,833
Interest rate contracts		Receivables			-		Accounts payable		81	Receivables		-		Accounts payable		81
		Other assets			-		Other liabilities		113	Other assets		-		Other liabilities		113

					-				194			-				194

Foreign exchange contracts		Receivables			75		Accounts payable			Receivables		75		Accounts payable		-

Totals				$	75			$	18,027		$	75			$	18,027

Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments:
Commodity contracts		Receivables		$	96		Accounts payable	$	4,104	Receivables	$	96		Accounts payable	$	4,104
		Other assets			-		Other liabilities		-	Other assets		-		Other liabilities		-

Totals				$	96			$	4,104		$	96			$	4,104

Total Derivative Instruments				$	171			$	22,131		$	171			$	22,131

The amounts in the table above reflect the fair value of the Company’s derivative contracts on a net basis. Had these amounts been recognized on a gross basis, the impact would have been a $500,000 increase in receivables with a corresponding increase in accounts payable.

Cash Flow Hedges

We enter into derivative instruments to hedge our exposure to changes in cash flows attributable to interest rates, foreign exchange rates, and commodity price fluctuations associated with certain forecasted transactions. These derivative instruments are designated and qualify as cash flow hedges. Accordingly, the effective portion of the gain or loss on the derivative instrument is reported as a component of other comprehensive income (loss) (“OCI”) and reclassified into earnings in the same financial statement caption associated with the forecasted transaction and in the same period during which the hedged transaction affects earnings. The ineffective portion of the gain or loss on the derivative instrument is recognized in earnings immediately.

The following table summarizes our cash flow hedges outstanding at ~~August 31,~~November 30, 2015:

(in thousands)    Notional
Amount    Maturity Date
Commodity contracts
   $ 78,081       September 2015 - December 2016
Interest rate contracts
   17,153       September 2019

(in thousands)    Notional
Amount    Maturity Date
Commodity contracts
   $ 73,757       December 2015 - November 2017
Interest rate contracts
   16,163       September 2019

The following table summarizes the gain (loss) recognized in OCI and the gain (loss) reclassified from accumulated OCI into earnings for derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedges during the three months ended ~~August 31,~~November 30, 2015 and 2014:


(in thousands)	Gain (Loss) Recognized in OCI (Effective Portion)			Location of Gain (Loss) Reclassified from Accumulated OCI (Effective Portion)	Gain (Loss) Reclassified from Accumulated OCI (Effective Portion)			Location of Gain (Loss) (Ineffective Portion) and Excluded from Effectiveness Testing	Gain (Loss) (Ineffective Portion) and Excluded from Effectiveness Testing		Gain (Loss) Recognized in OCI (Effective Portion)			Location of Gain (Loss) Reclassified from Accumulated OCI (Effective Portion)	Gain (Loss) Reclassified from Accumulated OCI (Effective Portion)			Location of Gain (Loss) (Ineffective Portion) and Excluded from Effectiveness Testing	Gain (Loss) (Ineffective Portion) and Excluded from Effectiveness Testing
For the three months ended August 31, 2015:
For the three months ended November 30, 2015:
Interest rate contracts											$	(201	)	Interest expense	$	(146	)	Interest expense	$	-
Commodity contracts	$	(8,126	)	Cost of goods sold	$	(9,187	)	Cost of goods sold	$	-		(10,210	)	Cost of goods sold		(6,460	)	Cost of goods sold		-

Totals											$	(10,411	)		$	(6,606	)		$	-

For the three months ended November 30, 2014:
Interest rate contracts		34		Interest expense		(139	)	Interest expense		-	$	-		Interest expense	$	(1,137	)	Interest expense	$	-
Commodity contracts												(4,362	)	Cost of goods sold		(356	)	Cost of goods sold		-
Foreign currency contracts		-		Miscellaneous income		(4	)	Miscellaneous income		-		(103	)	Miscellaneous income		-		Miscellaneous income		-

Totals	$	(8,092	)		$	(9,330	)		$	-	$	(4,465	)		$	(1,493	)		$	-

For the three months ended August 31, 2014:
Commodity contracts	$	(413	)	Cost of goods sold	$	(796	)	Cost of goods sold	$	-
Interest rate contracts		-		Interest expense		(1,148	)	Interest expense		-

Totals	$	(413	)		$	(1,944	)		$	-


(in thousands)	Gain (Loss) Recognized in OCI (Effective Portion)			Location of Gain (Loss) Reclassified from Accumulated OCI (Effective Portion)	Gain (Loss) Reclassified from Accumulated OCI (Effective Portion)			Location of Gain (Loss) (Ineffective Portion) and Excluded from Effectiveness Testing	Gain (Loss) (Ineffective Portion) and Excluded from Effectiveness Testing
For the six months ended November 30, 2015:
Interest rate contracts	$	(167	)	Interest expense	$	(285	)	Interest expense	$	-
Commodity contracts		(18,336	)	Cost of goods sold		(15,647	)	Cost of goods sold		-
Foreign currency contracts		-		Miscellaneous income		(4	)	Miscellaneous income		-

Totals	$	(18,503	)		$	(15,936	)		$	-

For the six months ended November 30, 2014:
Interest rate contracts	$	-		Interest expense	$	(2,285	)	Interest expense	$	-
Commodity contracts		(4,775	)	Cost of goods sold		(1,152	)	Cost of goods sold		-
Foreign currency contracts		(103	)	Miscellaneous income		-		Miscellaneous income		-

Totals	$	(4,878	)		$	(3,437	)		$	-

The estimated net amount of the losses recognized in accumulated OCI at ~~August 31,~~November 30, 2015 expected to be reclassified into net earnings within the succeeding twelve months is ~~$12,131,000~~$14,346,000 (net of tax of ~~$7,029,000)~~$8,161,000). This amount was computed using the fair value of the cash flow hedges at ~~August 31,~~November 30, 2015, and will change before actual reclassification from OCI to net earnings during the fiscal years ending May 31, 2016 and 2017.

Economic (Non-designated) Hedges

We enter into foreign currency contracts to manage our foreign exchange exposure related to inter-company and financing transactions that do not meet the requirements for hedge accounting treatment. We also enter into certain commodity contracts that do not qualify for hedge accounting treatment. Accordingly, these derivative instruments are adjusted to current market value at the end of each period through earnings.

The following table summarizes our economic (non-designated) derivative instruments outstanding at ~~August 31,~~November 30, 2015:

(in thousands)

Notional
Amount

Maturity Date(s)

Notional
Amount

Maturity Date(s)

Commodity contracts

31,275

September 2015 - February 2017

31,169

December 2015 - May 2017

Foreign currency contracts

774

November 2015

1,090

February 2016

The following table summarizes the gain (loss) recognized in earnings for economic (non-designated) derivative financial instruments during the three months ended ~~August 31,~~November 30, 2015 and 2014:


	Location of Gain (Loss)	Gain (Loss) Recognized in Earnings for the Three Months Ended August 31,						Location of Gain (Loss)	Gain (Loss) Recognized in Earnings for the Three Months Ended November 30,
(in thousands)	Recognized in Earnings	2015			2014			Recognized in Earnings	2015			2014
Commodity contracts	Cost of goods sold	$	(2,755	)	$	(57	)	Cost of goods sold	$	(5,390	)	$	(2,360	)
Foreign exchange contracts	Miscellaneous income (expense)		-			261
Foreign currency contracts								Miscellaneous income (expense)		70			(218	)

Total		$	(2,755	)	$	204			$	(5,320	)	$	(2,578	)

The following table summarizes the gain (loss) recognized in earnings for economic (non-designated) derivative financial instruments during the six months ended November 30, 2015 and 2014:


	Location of Gain (Loss)	Gain (Loss) Recognized in Earnings for the Six Months Ended November 30,
(in thousands)	Recognized in Earnings	2015			2014
Commodity contracts	Cost of goods sold	$	(8,145	)	$	(2,417	)
Foreign currency contracts	Miscellaneous income (expense)		70			43

Total		$	(8,075	)	$	(2,374	)

The gain (loss) on the foreign currency derivatives significantly offsets the gain (loss) on the hedged item.

NOTE O – Fair Value

Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. Fair value is an exit price concept that assumes an orderly transaction between willing market participants and is required to be based on assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset or a liability. Current accounting guidance establishes a three-tier fair value hierarchy as a basis for considering such assumptions and for classifying the inputs used in the valuation methodologies. This hierarchy requires entities to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs. The three levels of inputs used to measure fair values are as follows:


Level 1	–	Observable prices in active markets for identical assets and liabilities.

Level 2	–	Observable inputs other than quoted prices in active markets for identical or similar assets and liabilities.

Level 3	–	Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets and liabilities.

Recurring Fair Value Measurements

At ~~August 31,~~November 30, 2015, our financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis were as follows:

(in thousands)    Quoted Prices
in Active
Markets
(Level 1)    Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)    Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)    Totals
Assets

Derivative contracts (1)
   $ -       $ 11       $ -       $ 11








Total assets
   $ -       $ 11       $ -       $ 11








Liabilities

Derivative contracts (1)
   $ -       $ 22,112       $ -       $ 22,112
Contingent consideration obligations (2)
   -       -       3,979       3,979








Total liabilities
   $ -       $ 22,112       $ 3,979       $ 26,091

(in thousands)    Quoted Prices
in Active
Markets
(Level 1)    Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)    Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)    Totals
Assets

Derivative contracts (1)
   $ -       $ 5       $ -       $ 5








Total assets
   $ -       $ 5       $ -       $ 5








Liabilities

Derivative contracts (1)
   $ -       $ 24,968       $ -       $ 24,968








Total liabilities
   $ -       $ 24,968       $ -       $ 24,968

At May 31, 2015, our financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis were as follows:


(in thousands)	Quoted Prices in Active Markets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)		Totals		Quoted Prices in Active Markets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)		Totals
Assets
Derivative contracts (1)	$	-	$	171	$	-	$	171	$	-	$	171	$	-	$	171

Total assets	$	-	$	171	$	-	$	171	$	-	$	171	$	-	$	171

Liabilities
Derivative contracts (1)	$	-	$	22,131	$	-	$	22,131	$	-	$	22,131	$	-	$	22,131
Contingent consideration obligation (2)		-		-		3,979		3,979
Contingent consideration obligations (2)										-		-		3,979		3,979

Total liabilities	$	-	$	22,131	$	3,979	$	26,110	$	-	$	22,131	$	3,979	$	26,110

(1)

The fair value of our derivative contracts is based on the present value of the expected future cash flows considering the risks involved, including non-performance risk, and using discount rates appropriate for the respective maturities. Market observable, Level 2 inputs are used to determine the present value of the expected future cash flows. Refer to “Note N – Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities” for additional information regarding our use of derivative instruments.

(2)

The fair value of the contingent consideration ~~obligation~~obligations is determined using a probability weighted cash flow approach based on management’s projections of future cash flows of the acquired ~~business.~~businesses. The fair value measurement was based on Level 3 inputs not observable in the market.

Non-Recurring Fair Value Measurements

At ~~August 31,~~November 30, 2015, our ~~financial~~ assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis were as follows:


(in thousands)	Quoted Prices in Active Markets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)		Totals		Quoted Prices in Active Markets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)		Totals
Assets
Long-lived assets held and used (1)	$	-	$	1,059	$	-	$	1,059	$	-	$	-	$	36,933	$	36,933

Total assets	$	-	$	1,059	$	-	$	1,059	$	-	$	-	$	36,933	$	36,933

(1)

During the ~~first~~second quarter of fiscal 2016, management reviewed certain long-lived assets of its ~~Engineered Cabs facility~~Oil & Gas Equipment business in ~~Florence, South Carolina,~~Pressure Cylinders for impairment. In accordance with the applicable accounting guidance, ~~long-lived assets~~two asset groups within Oil & Gas Equipment with a total carrying value of ~~$4,059,000~~$59,895,000 were written down to their estimated fair value of ~~$1,059,000~~$36,933,000 resulting in an impairment charge of ~~$3,000,000~~$22,962,000 during the three months ended ~~August 31,~~November 30, 2015. ~~Comparable~~Fair value was based on expected future cash flows using Level 3 inputs under ASC 820. The cash flows are those expected to be generated by market ~~transactions were used~~participants, discounted at a 13% discount rate to ~~measure fair value.~~account for the risks inherent in those cash flow projections. Because of deteriorating market conditions (i.e. rising interest rates and lower marketplace demand), it is reasonably possible that our estimate of discounted cash flows may change resulting in the need to perform additional impairment testing. Refer to “NOTE C – Impairment of Long-Lived Assets” for additional information.

At May 31, 2015, our assets measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis were categorized as follows:


(in thousands)	Quoted Prices in Active Markets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)		Totals		Quoted Prices in Active Markets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)		Totals
Assets
Long-lived assets held and used (1)	$	-	$	-	$	12,403	$	12,403	$	-	$	-	$	12,403	$	12,403

Total assets	$	-	$	-	$	12,403	$	12,403	$	-	$	-	$	12,403	$	12,403

(1)

During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2015, management reviewed certain intangible assets related to our CNG fuel systems joint venture, dHybrid, for impairment. In accordance with the applicable accounting guidance, the intangible assets were written down to their fair value of $600,000, resulting in an impairment charge of $2,344,000. The key assumptions that drove the fair value calculation were projected cash flows and the discount rate.

During the third quarter of fiscal 2015, the Company concluded that an interim impairment test of the goodwill of its Engineered Cabs operating segment was necessary. Prior to conducting the goodwill impairment test, the Company first evaluated the other long-lived assets of the Engineered Cabs operating segment for recoverability. Recoverability was tested using future cash flow projections based on management’s long-range estimates of market conditions. The sum of the undiscounted future cash flows for the customer relationship intangible asset and the property, plant and equipment of the Florence, South Carolina facility were less than their respective carrying values. As a result, these assets were written down to their respective fair values of $2,000,000 and $9,803,000. The fair value measurements were based on Level 3 inputs not observable in the market. The key assumptions that drove the fair value calculations were projected cash flows and the discount rate.

The fair value of non-derivative financial instruments included in the carrying amounts of cash and cash equivalents, receivables, notes receivable, income taxes receivable, other assets, accounts payable, short-term borrowings, accrued compensation, contributions to employee benefit plans and related taxes, other accrued items,

income taxes payable and other liabilities approximate carrying value due to their short-term nature. The fair value of long-term debt, including current maturities, based upon models utilizing market observable (Level 2) inputs and credit risk, was ~~$596,651,000~~$603,198,000 and $610,028,000 at ~~August 31,~~November 30, 2015 and May 31, 2015, respectively. The carrying amount of long-term debt, including current maturities, was ~~$581,747,000~~$579,867,000 and $580,193,000 at ~~August 31,~~November 30, 2015 and May 31, 2015, respectively.

NOTE P – Subsequent Events

On December 7, 2015, the Company completed the acquisition of the global CryoScience business of Taylor Wharton, including a manufacturing facility in Theodore, Alabama, for $31,400,000, after adjusting for estimated working capital. The asset purchase was made pursuant to the Chapter 11 bankruptcy proceedings of Taylor Wharton. The purchase price allocation will be completed in the third quarter of fiscal 2016. The acquired business will be reported within the Pressure Cylinders operating segment.

Item 2. — Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Selected statements contained in this “Item 2. – Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” constitute “forward-looking statements” as that term is used in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Such forward-looking statements are based, in whole or in part, on management’s beliefs, estimates, assumptions and currently available information. For a more detailed discussion of what constitutes a forward-looking statement and of some of the factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from such forward-looking statements, please refer to the “Safe Harbor Statement” in the beginning of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and “Part I - Item 1A. - Risk Factors” of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2015.

Introduction

The following discussion and analysis of market and industry trends, business developments, and the results of operations and financial position of Worthington Industries, Inc., together with its subsidiaries (collectively, “we,” “our,” “Worthington,” or our “Company”), should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in “Item 1. – Financial Statements” of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. Our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2015 (“fiscal 2015”) includes additional information about Worthington, our operations and our consolidated financial position and should be read in conjunction with this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

As of ~~August 31,~~November 30, 2015, excluding our joint ventures, we operated 3331 manufacturing facilities worldwide, principally in three operating segments, which correspond with our reportable business segments: Steel Processing, Pressure Cylinders and Engineered Cabs. Our remaining operating segments, which do not meet the applicable aggregation criteria or quantitative thresholds for separate disclosure, are combined and reported in the “Other” category. These include Construction Services and Worthington Energy Innovations (“WEI”). The Company is in the process of exiting the businesses within Construction Services.

We also held equity positions in 13 active joint ventures, which operated 51 manufacturing facilities worldwide, as of ~~August 31,~~November 30, 2015. Six of these joint ventures are consolidated with the equity owned by the other joint venture member(s), shown as noncontrolling interests in our consolidated balance sheets, and the other joint venture member(s)’ portion of net earnings and other comprehensive income (loss), shown as net earnings or comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interests in our consolidated statements of earnings and consolidated statements of comprehensive income, respectively. The remaining seven of these joint ventures are accounted for using the equity method.

Overview

The Company ~~generated solid earnings during~~delivered a steady performance in the ~~first~~second quarter of fiscal 2016 despite challenging market conditions resulting from declining steel and oil prices. Inventory holding losses in Steel Processing and lower volume in the oil and gas equipment business in Pressure Cylinders weighed on earnings; however, lower overall2016. Lower manufacturing costs, improved profitability in Industrial Products and ~~improved operations~~Consumer Products and strong contributions from our unconsolidated joint ventures highlighted the quarter. Demand remains healthy in ~~the industrial gas and consumer product end markets in Pressure Cylinders helped to offset the impact. Demand remained steady in most~~many of our key end markets with the exception of Oil & Gas and Agriculture. The quarter included several unique items including $23.0 million of non-cash charges related to the ~~oil and gas equipment, construction and agriculture end markets. The Company continues to take action to reduce the cost structure~~impairment of certain ~~facilities serving these markets~~long-lived assets in ~~order~~our Oil & Gas Equipment business; net restructuring charges of $2.3 million in Steel Processing tied to ~~remain cash flow positive. During~~ the ~~current~~ongoing closure of PSM, our stainless business, and the disposal of the remaining fixed assets of our legacy Baltimore steel processing facility; and $1.5 million of gains from the sale of real estate in our legacy metal framing business.

Pressure Cylinders’ operating income was down $19.9 million. The decline was driven by significant declines in the Oil & Gas Equipment business. Operating margins for the quarter were essentially flat as compared to the ~~Company announced~~prior year quarter helped by lower manufacturing costs and improvements in operations in Industrial Products and Consumer Products.

Steel Processing operating income was down $7.3 million from the prior year quarter to $26.6 million. The decline was driven primarily by lower tolling volume at our Spartan joint venture and steel price declines, however, lower freight costs combined with contributions from the Rome acquisition led to an ~~additional workforce reduction at three~~increase in gross margin as a percent of ~~its five oil~~sales.

Revenue in Engineered Cabs was down 44% to $28.7 million and ~~gas equipment facilities.~~operating losses were $4.3 million. The ~~previously announced~~ closure of the ~~Company’s Engineered Cabs~~Florence facility ~~in Florence, South Carolina, remains on track, as~~and transition of the ~~Company ceased production at the facility on September 30, 2015, and is in the process of transferring certain~~ business to the ~~Engineered Cabs~~Greeneville facility is complete and despite the revenue decline, profitability improved by $1.3 million from the comparable quarter in ~~Greeneville, Tennessee.~~the prior year.

Equity in net income of unconsolidated affiliates (“equity income”) was ~~down 5%~~up $6.9 million, or 31%, from the prior year ~~quarter driven by $1.7~~quarter. WAVE and ArtiFlex were up $1.4 million and $0.9 million respectively. ClarkDietrich was $6.0 million better and still up $2.0 million after excluding the impact of ~~product development expenses~~a $4.0 million legal settlement related to ~~the alternative fuels business~~successful disparagement litigation against several competitors in an industry trade association. Serviacero fell $800,000 due to falling steel prices and lower earnings at Serviacero, which was negatively impacted by lower steel prices. Record earnings at WAVE and higher contributions from ClarkDietrich, Samuel and ArtiFlex partially offset the overall decrease in equity income.WSP declined $400,000. We received ~~cash distributions~~dividends from unconsolidated joint ventures of ~~$21.1~~$18.9 million ~~from our unconsolidated affiliates~~ during the ~~first quarter of fiscal 2016.~~quarter.

Recent Business Developments

On December 7, 2015, subsequent to quarter-end, the Company completed the acquisition of the global CryoScience business of Taylor Wharton, including a manufacturing facility in Theodore, Alabama, for $31.4 million after adjusting for estimated working capital. The asset purchase was made pursuant to the Chapter 11 bankruptcy proceedings of Taylor Wharton. The acquired business will be reported within the Pressure Cylinders operating segment.

During the quarter, the Company repurchased a total of ~~1,000,000~~1,500,000 common shares for ~~$27.6~~$43.9 million at an average price of ~~$27.58.~~$29.26.

On ~~September 23,~~December 16, 2015, the ~~board~~Board of ~~directors~~Directors of Worthington Industries, Inc. (the “Board”) declared a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share payable on ~~December~~March 29, ~~2015~~2016 to shareholders of record on ~~December~~March 15, ~~2015.~~2016.

Market & Industry Overview

We sell our products and services to a diverse customer base and a broad range of end markets. The breakdown of our net sales by end market for the ~~first three months~~second quarter of each of fiscal 2016 and fiscal 2015 is illustrated in the following chart:

LOGO

The automotive industry is one of the largest consumers of flat-rolled steel, and thus the largest end market for our Steel Processing operating segment. Approximately ~~60%~~66% of the net sales of our Steel Processing operating segment are to the automotive market. North American vehicle production, primarily by Chrysler, Ford and General Motors (the “Detroit Three automakers”), has a considerable impact on the activity within this operating segment. The majority of the net sales of four of our unconsolidated joint ventures are also to the automotive end market.

Approximately ~~10%~~9% of the net sales of our Steel Processing operating segment, ~~60%~~50% of the net sales of our Engineered Cabs operating segment and substantially all of the net sales of our Construction Services operating segment are to the construction market. The construction market is also the predominant end market for two of our unconsolidated joint ventures: WAVE and ClarkDietrich. While the market price of steel significantly impacts these businesses, there are other key indicators that are meaningful in analyzing construction market demand, including U.S. gross domestic product (“GDP”), the Dodge Index of construction contracts and, in the case of ClarkDietrich, trends in the relative price of framing lumber and steel.

Substantially all of the net sales of our Pressure Cylinders operating segment, and approximately ~~30%~~25% and ~~40%~~50% of the net sales of our Steel Processing and Engineered Cabs operating segments, respectively, are to other markets such as consumer products, industrial, lawn and garden, agriculture, oil and gas equipment, heavy truck, mining, forestry and appliance. Given the many different products that make up these net sales and the wide variety of end markets, it is very difficult to detail the key market indicators that drive ~~this portion~~these portions of our business. However, we believe that the trend in U.S. GDP growth is a good economic indicator for analyzing these operating segments.

We use the following information to monitor our costs and demand in our major end markets:


	Three Months Ended August 31,									Three Months Ended November 30,									Six Months Ended November 30,
	2015			2014			Inc / (Dec)			2015			2014			Inc / (Dec)			2015			2014			Inc / (Dec)
U.S. GDP (% growth year-over-year)¹		1.4	%		2.8	%		-1.4	%		1.0	%		2.4	%		-1.4	%		1.2	%		2.6	%		-1.4	%
Hot-Rolled Steel ($ per ton)²	$	461		$	671		($	210	)	$	419		$	651		($	232	)	$	440		$	662		($	222	)
Detroit Three Auto Build (000’s vehicles)³		2,355			2,238			117			2,460			2,350			110			4,778			4,588			190
No. America Auto Build (000’s vehicles)³		4,446			4,172			274			4,598			4,485			113			8,989			8,401			588
Zinc ($ per pound)⁴	$	0.88		$	0.99		($	0.11	)	$	0.75		$	1.04		($	0.29	)	$	0.82		$	1.01		($	0.19	)
Natural Gas ($ per mcf)⁵	$	2.78		$	4.61		($	1.83	)	$	2.59		$	3.98		($	1.39	)	$	2.69		$	4.30		($	1.61	)
On-Highway Diesel Fuel Prices ($ per gallon)⁶	$	2.75		$	3.88		($	1.13	)	$	2.50		$	3.71		($	1.21	)	$	2.63		$	3.80		($	1.17	)

¹	2014 figures based on revised actuals² CRU Hot-Rolled Index; period average³ IHS Global⁴ LME Zinc; period average⁵ NYMEX Henry Hub Natural Gas; period average⁶ Energy Information Administration; period average

U.S. GDP growth rate trends are generally indicative of the strength in demand and, in many cases, pricing for our products. A year-over-year increase in U.S. GDP growth rates is indicative of a stronger economy, which generally increases demand and pricing for our products. Conversely, decreasing U.S. GDP growth rates generally indicate a weaker economy. Changes in U.S. GDP growth rates can also signal changes in conversion costs related to production and in selling, general and administrative (“SG&A”) expense.

The market price of hot-rolled steel is one of the most significant factors impacting our selling prices and operating results. When steel prices fall, we typically have higher-priced material flowing through cost of goods sold, while selling prices compress to what the market will bear, negatively impacting our results. On the other hand, in a rising price environment, our results are generally favorably impacted, as lower-priced material purchased in previous periods flows through cost of goods sold, while our selling prices increase at a faster pace to cover current replacement costs.

The following table presents the average quarterly market price per ton of hot-rolled steel during fiscal 2016 (first and second quarters), fiscal 2015 and fiscal 2014:


(Dollars per ton¹)
	Fiscal Year						Fiscal Year						Inc / (Dec)
	2016		2015		2014		2016		2015		2014		2016 vs. 2015					2015 vs. 2014
1st Quarter	$	461	$	671	$	627	$	461	$	671	$	627	($	210	)	-31.3	%	$	44		7.0	%
2nd Quarter		N/A	$	651	$	651	$	419	$	651	$	651	($	232	)	-35.6	%	$	0		0.0	%
3rd Quarter		N/A	$	578	$	669		N/A	$	578	$	669		N/A		N/A		($	91	)	-13.6	%
4th Quarter		N/A	$	464	$	655		N/A	$	464	$	655		N/A		N/A		($	191	)	-29.2	%
Annual Avg.		N/A	$	591	$	651		N/A	$	591	$	651		N/A		N/A		($	60	)	-9.2	%

¹	CRU Hot-Rolled Index, period average

No single customer contributed more than 10% of our consolidated net sales during the ~~first~~second quarter of fiscal 2016. While our automotive business is largely driven by the production schedules of the Detroit Three automakers, our customer base is much broader and includes other domestic manufacturers and many of their suppliers. During the ~~first~~second quarter of fiscal 2016, overall vehicle production for the Detroit Three automakers was up 5% and North American vehicle production as a whole increased 7%3%.

Certain other commodities, such as zinc, natural gas and diesel fuel, represent a significant portion of our cost of goods sold, both directly through our plant operations and indirectly through transportation and freight expense.

Results of Operations

~~First~~Second Quarter - Fiscal 2016 Compared to Fiscal 2015

Consolidated Operations

The following table presents consolidated operating results for the periods indicated:


		Three Months Ended August 31,															Three Months Ended November 30,
(Dollars in millions)		2015			% of Net sales			2014			% of Net sales			Increase/ (Decrease)			2015			% of Net sales			2014			% of Net sales			Increase/ (Decrease)
Net sales		$	758.1			100.0	%	$	862.4			100.0	%	$	(104.3	)	$	699.9			100.0	%	$	871.0			100.0	%	$	(171.1	)
Cost of goods sold			645.1			85.1	%		732.9			85.0	%		(87.8	)		590.7			84.4	%		745.8			85.6	%		(155.1	)

Gross margin			113.0			14.9	%		129.5			15.0	%		(16.5	)		109.2			15.6	%		125.2			14.4	%		(16.0	)
Selling, general and administrative expense			75.9			10.0	%		75.3			8.7	%		0.6			72.7			10.4	%		77.3			8.9	%		(4.6	)
Impairment of long-lived assets			3.0			0.4	%		1.9			0.2	%		1.1			23.0			3.3	%		14.2			1.6	%		8.8
Restructuring and other expense			3.1			0.4	%		0.1			0.0	%		3.0			1.5			0.2	%		0.5			0.1	%		1.0

Operating income			31.0			4.1	%		52.2			6.1	%		(21.2	)		12.0			1.7	%		33.2			3.8	%		(21.2	)
Miscellaneous income (expense)			(0.6	)		-0.1	%		0.3			0.0	%		(0.9	)
Miscellaneous income																		1.0			0.1	%		1.2			0.1	%		(0.2	)
Interest expense			(7.9	)		-1.0	%		(9.5	)		-1.1	%		1.6			(7.8	)		-1.1	%		(9.7	)		-1.1	%		1.9
Equity in net income of unconsolidated affiliates(1)	��		26.6			3.5	%		27.9			3.2	%		(1.3	)		29.2			4.2	%		22.3			2.6	%		6.9
Income tax expense			(14.7	)		-1.9	%		(22.1	)		-2.6	%		7.4			(8.8	)		-1.3	%		(15.6	)		-1.8	%		(6.8	)

Net earnings			34.4			4.5	%		48.8			5.7	%		(14.4	)		25.6			3.7	%		31.4			3.6	%		(5.8	)
Net earnings attributable to noncontrolling interests			3.0			0.4	%		4.6			0.5	%		1.6			2.4			0.3	%		1.9			0.2	%		(0.5	)

Net earnings attributable to controlling interest		$	31.4			4.1	%	$	44.2			5.1	%	$	(12.8	)	$	23.2			3.3	%	$	29.5			3.4	%	$	(6.3	)


(1) Equity income by unconsolidated affiliate
WAVE																	$	19.1					$	17.7					$	1.4
ClarkDietrich																		6.4						0.4						6.0
Serviacero																		0.4						1.2						(0.8	)
ArtiFlex																		2.6						1.7						0.9
WSP																		0.7						1.1						(0.4	)
Other																		-						0.2						(0.2	)

Total																	$	29.2					$	22.3					$	6.9

Net earnings attributable to controlling interest for the three months ended ~~August 31,~~November 30, 2015 decreased ~~$12.8~~$6.3 million from the comparable period in the prior year. Net sales and operating highlights were as follows:

Net sales decreased ~~$104.3~~$171.1 million from the comparable period in the prior year. The decrease was driven by lower volume in nearly all business segments, ~~which reduced net sales by $79.4 million,~~ combined with lower average selling prices in Steel Processing driven by the market decline in ~~the market price of steel.~~steel prices.

Gross margin decreased ~~$16.5~~$16.0 million from the comparable period in the prior year on lower volume, ~~and the unfavorable impact of inventory holding losses in Steel Processing in the current period compared to gains in the prior year period. Lower~~partially offset by lower manufacturing expenses ~~partially offset the overall decrease in gross margin.~~and a favorable pricing spread.

SG&A expense ~~increased slightly~~decreased $4.6 million over the comparable prior year period to ~~$75.9~~$72.7 million ~~as the impact of acquisitions was partially offset by~~on lower profit sharing and bonus expense.

Impairment charges of ~~$3.0~~$23.0 million in the current period related to the ~~pending closure~~impairment of ~~the Engineered Cabs facility~~certain long-lived assets in ~~Florence, South Carolina. Impairment charges in the comparable prior year period related to the Company’s stainless steel business, Precision Specialty Metals, Inc. (“PSM”).~~our Oil & Gas Equipment business. For additional information, refer to “Item 1. – Financial Statements – Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements – NOTE C – Impairment of Long-Lived Assets” of this Quarterly Report onForm 10-Q.

Restructuring and other expense of ~~$3.1~~$1.5 million in the current period consisted of $2.3 million in net restructuring charges in Steel Processing primarily tied to the ongoing closure of ~~accruals for employee severance costs~~PSM ($4.9 million) and a net gain related to the ~~pending closure~~disposal of the ~~Florence facility in Engineered Cabs ($1.9 million) and the recently announced workforce reductions in~~remaining fixed assets of our ~~oil and gas equipment businesses ($690,000).~~legacy Baltimore steel processing

facility ($3.0 million). The remaining restructuring activity in the current quarter consisted of $1.5 million of gains from the sale of real estate in our legacy metal framing business and $765,000 of facility exit costs related to the closure of the Florence facility in Engineered Cabs.

Interest expense of ~~$7.9~~$7.8 million was ~~$1.6~~$1.9 million lower than the comparable period in the prior year. The decrease was driven by lower average debt ~~levels.~~levels, partially due to the lower market price of steel favorably impacting working capital, combined with the repayment of $100 million of unsecured floating rate notes in December 2014.

Equity income ~~decreased $1.3~~increased $6.9 million from the comparable period in the prior year. ~~The decrease~~WAVE and ArtiFlex were up $1.4 million and $0.9 million, respectively. ClarkDietrich was ~~driven by $1.7~~$6.0 million better and still up $2.0 million after excluding the impact of ~~product development expenses~~a $4.0 million legal settlement related to successful disparagement litigation against several competitors in an industry trade association. Serviacero fell $800,000 from falling steel prices and WSP declined $400,000. We received dividends from unconsolidated joint ventures of $18.9 million during the ~~alternative fuels business and lower earnings at Serviacero,~~quarter. For additional financial information regarding our unconsolidated affiliates, refer to “Item 1. – Financial Statements – Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements – NOTE B – Investments in Unconsolidated Affiliates” of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

which was negatively impacted by lower steel prices. Record earnings at WAVE and higher contributions from ClarkDietrich, Samuel and ArtiFlex partially offset the overall decrease in equity income. For additional financial information regarding our unconsolidated affiliates, refer to “Item 1. – Financial Statements – Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements – NOTE B – Investments in Unconsolidated Affiliates” of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

Income tax expense decreased ~~$7.4~~$6.8 million from the comparable period in the prior year due ~~primarily~~ to lower ~~earnings.~~earnings, primarily resulting from the impact of impairment charges recorded in the current year. The current quarter expense of ~~$14.7~~$8.8 million was calculated using an estimated annual effective income tax rate of ~~31.8%~~31.2% versus ~~32.8%~~33.5% in the prior year quarter. Refer to “Item 1. – Financial Statements – Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements – NOTE K – Income Taxes” of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for more information on our tax rates.

Segment Operations

Steel Processing

The following table presents a summary of operating results for our Steel Processing operating segment for the periods indicated:


	Three Months Ended August 31,													Three Months Ended November 30,
(Dollars in millions)	2015		% of Net sales			2014		% of Net sales			Increase/ (Decrease)			2015		% of Net sales			2014		% of Net sales			Increase/ (Decrease)
Net sales	$	490.8		100.0	%	$	552.3		100.0	%	$	(61.5	)	$	467.8		100.0	%	$	552.8		100.0	%	$	(85.0	)
Cost of goods sold		433.8		88.4	%		482.6		87.4	%		(48.8	)		406.0		86.8	%		487.6		88.2	%		(81.6	)

Gross margin		57.0		11.6	%		69.7		12.6	%		(12.7	)		61.8		13.2	%		65.2		11.8	%		(3.4	)
Selling, general and administrative expense		32.9		6.7	%		31.9		5.8	%		1.0			32.9		7.0	%		30.2		5.5	%		2.7
Impairment of long-lived assets		-		0.0	%		1.9		0.3	%		(1.9	)		-		0.0	%		1.1		0.2	%		(1.1	)
Restructuring and other expense		0.5		0.1	%		-		0.0	%		0.5			2.3		0.5	%		-		0.0	%		2.3

Operating income	$	23.6		4.8	%	$	35.9		6.5	%	$	(12.3	)	$	26.6		5.7	%	$	33.9		6.1	%	$	(7.3	)

Material cost	$	348.2				$	394.9				$	(46.7	)	$	322.5				$	400.7				$	(78.2	)
Tons shipped (in thousands)		866					905					(39	)		828					899					(70	)

Net sales and operating highlights were as follows:

Net sales decreased ~~$61.5~~$85.0 million from the comparable period in the prior ~~year.~~year on lower volume and lower average selling prices. Declining steel prices led to lower average selling prices, which reduced net sales by ~~$41.8~~$66.7 million. Volume also declined in the current period reducing net sales by an additional ~~$19.7~~$18.3 million as lower tolling volume more than offset contributions from the recent acquisition of Rome Strip Steel. The mix of direct versus toll tons processed was ~~63%~~65% to ~~37%~~35% compared to 60% to 40% in the ~~first~~second quarter of fiscal 2015.

Operating income decreased ~~$12.3~~$7.3 million from the comparable period in the prior ~~year. The decrease was driven primarily by the unfavorable impact of inventory holding losses in the current period compared to inventory holding gains in the prior~~ year ~~period. Restructuring and other expense in the current period consisted of severance accruals related~~due primarily to the ~~closure~~combined impact of ~~PSM.~~lower volume and a decrease in spread between average selling prices and material cost. However, a $2.6 million credit in material cost related to successful price-fixing litigation against

certain steel mills combined with lower freight costs and contributions from the Rome acquisition led to an increase in gross margin as a percent of sales. Restructuring and other expense in the current quarter consisted primarily of costs related to the ongoing closure of PSM ($4.9 million) and a net gain related to the disposal of the remaining fixed assets of our legacy Baltimore steel processing facility ($3.0 million).

Pressure Cylinders

The following table presents a summary of operating results for our Pressure Cylinders operating segment for the periods indicated:


	Three Months Ended August 31,													Three Months Ended November 30,
(Dollars in millions)	2015		% of Net sales			2014		% of Net sales			Increase/ (Decrease)			2015			% of Net sales			2014		% of Net sales			Increase/ (Decrease)
Net sales	$	224.4		100.0	%	$	249.0		100.0	%	$	(24.6	)	$	201.2			100.0	%	$	252.7		100.0	%	$	(51.5	)
Cost of goods sold		170.0		75.8	%		194.4		78.1	%		(24.4	)		154.6			76.8	%		197.2		78.0	%		(42.6	)

Gross margin		54.4		24.2	%		54.6		21.9	%		(0.2	)		46.6			23.2	%		55.5		22.0	%		(8.9	)
Selling, general and administrative expense		36.9		16.4	%		35.0		14.1	%		1.9			33.9			16.8	%		35.9		14.2	%		(2.0	)
Impairment of long-lived assets															23.0			11.4	%		9.6		3.8	%		13.4
Restructuring and other expense		0.7		0.3	%		-		0.0	%		0.7			(0.0	)		0.0	%		0.4		0.2	%		(0.4	)

Operating income	$	16.8		7.5	%	$	19.6		7.9	%	$	(2.8	)
Operating income (loss)														$	(10.3	)		-5.1	%	$	9.6		3.8	%	$	(19.9	)


Material cost	$	99.1				$	118.4				$	(19.3	)	$	85.5					$	115.8				$	(30.3	)

Net sales by principal class of products:
Consumer Products	$	55.0				$	55.6				$	(0.6	)	$	49.5					$	51.3				$	(1.8	)
Industrial Products		105.1					109.1					(4.0	)
Industrial Products*															97.6						99.2					(1.6	)
Mississippi*															-						6.3					(6.3	)
Alternative Fuels		24.8					21.8					3.0			24.0						22.8					1.2
Oil and Gas Equipment		32.9					57.3					(24.4	)
Oil & Gas Equipment															25.0						66.9					(41.9	)
Cryogenics		6.6					5.2					1.4			5.1						6.2					(1.1	)

Total Pressure Cylinders	$	224.4				$	249.0				$	(24.6	)	$	201.2					$	252.7				$	(51.5	)


Units shipped by principal class of products:
Consumer Products		11,977,945					12,346,630					(368,685	)		10,523,692						11,240,094					(716,402	)
Industrial Products		7,147,952					7,916,492					(768,540	)
Industrial Products*															5,926,739						6,161,759					(235,020	)
Mississippi*															-						1,577,717					(1,577,717	)
Alternative Fuels		91,956					104,089					(12,133	)		107,121						107,300					(179	)
Oil and Gas Equipment		1,320					2,987					(1,667	)
Oil & Gas Equipment															1,044						2,994					(1,950	)
Cryogenics		237					187					50			227						182					45

Total Pressure Cylinders		19,219,410					20,370,385					(1,150,975	)		16,558,823						19,090,046					(2,531,223	)

*	Mississippi, an industrial gas facility, was sold in May 2015. It has been broken out so as not to distort the Industrial Products comparisons as the products previously produced at the Mississippi facility have been discontinued.

Net sales and operating highlights were as follows:

Net sales decreased ~~$24.6~~$51.5 million from the comparable period in the prior year on lower volume, particularly in the ~~oil and gas equipment businesses.~~Oil & Gas Equipment business where volumes decreased 65%. Volumes in the current quarter were also negatively impacted by the May 2015 disposition of our high-pressure cylinders business in Mississippi.

Operating income decreased ~~$2.8~~$19.9 million from the comparable period in the prior year as declines in ~~oil and gas equipment~~Oil & Gas Equipment more than offset improvements in the ~~industrial gas~~Industrial Products and ~~consumer products~~Consumer Products businesses resulting from lower manufacturing costs and an improved product mix. ~~Restructuring expense~~Impairment charges in the current ~~period consisted of an accrual for employee severance costs~~quarter related to the ~~recently announced workforce reductions~~write-off of certain long-lived assets in ~~our oil and gas equipment businesses.~~the Oil & Gas Equipment business.

Engineered Cabs

The following table presents a summary of operating results for our Engineered Cabs operating segment for the periods indicated:


	Three Months Ended August 31,															Three Months Ended November 30,
(Dollars in millions)	2015			% of Net sales			2014			% of Net sales			Increase/ (Decrease)			2015			% of Net sales			2014			% of Net sales			Increase/ (Decrease)
Net sales	$	38.6			100.0	%	$	49.6			100.0	%	$	(11.0	)	$	28.7			100.0	%	$	51.5			100.0	%	$	(22.8	)
Cost of goods sold		37.6			97.4	%		44.9			90.5	%		(7.3	)		27.4			95.5	%		47.6			92.4	%		(20.2	)

Gross margin		1.0			2.6	%		4.7			9.5	%		(3.7	)		1.3			4.5	%		3.9			7.6	%		(2.6	)
Selling, general and administrative expense		5.4			14.0	%		6.8			13.7	%		(1.4	)		4.9			17.1	%		7.1			13.8	%		(2.2	)
Impairment of long-lived assets		3.0			7.8	%		-			0.0	%		3.0			-			0.0	%		2.4			4.7	%		(2.4	)
Restructuring and other expense		1.9			4.9	%		-			0.0	%		1.9			0.7			2.4	%		-			0.0	%		0.7

Operating loss	$	(9.3	)		-24.1	%	$	(2.1	)		-4.2	%	$	(7.2	)	$	(4.3	)		-15.0	%	$	(5.6	)		-10.9	%	$	1.3


Material cost	$	18.0					$	22.0					$	(4.0	)	$	13.4					$	23.7					$	(10.3	)

Net sales and operating highlights were as follows:

Net sales decreased ~~$11.0~~$22.8 million from the comparable period in the prior year due to declines in market demand in most lines of business combined with the impact of the January 2015 sale of the assets of Advanced Component Technologies, Inc. ~~and lower volume in the construction and agriculture end markets.~~

Operating loss ~~increased $7.2~~decreased $1.3 million ~~due to higher impairment and restructuring charges and~~as efficiencies gained from the ~~unfavorable impact of lower volume. Impairment and restructuring charges totaled $4.9 million in the current period and related to the previously announced closure~~transition of the Engineered Cabs business from the Florence facility ~~in Florence, South Carolina.~~to the Greeneville facility helped to reduce the operating loss.

Other

The Other category includes the Construction Services and WEI operating segments, which do not meet the quantitative thresholds for separate disclosure. Certain income and expense items not allocated to our operating segments are also included in the Other category. The following table presents a summary of operating results for the Other category for the periods indicated:


	Three Months Ended August 31,															Three Months Ended November 30,
(Dollars in millions)	2015			% of Net sales			2014			% of Net sales			Increase/ (Decrease)			2015			% of Net sales			2014			% of Net sales			Increase/ (Decrease)
Net sales	$	4.3			100.0	%	$	11.6			100.0	%	$	(7.3	)	$	2.2			100.0	%	$	14.0			100.0	%	$	(11.8	)
Cost of goods sold		3.7			86.0	%		11.1			95.7	%		(7.4	)		2.7			122.7	%		13.4			95.7	%		(10.7	)

Gross margin		0.6			14.0	%		0.5			4.3	%		0.1			(0.5	)		-22.7	%		0.6			4.3	%		(1.1	)
Selling, general and administrative expense		0.8			18.6	%		1.5			12.9	%		(0.7	)		1.1			50.0	%		4.0			28.6	%		(2.9	)
Restructuring and other expense		-			0.0	%		0.1			0.9	%		(0.1	)
Impairment of long-lived assets																	-			0.0	%		1.2			8.6	%		(1.2	)
Restructuring and other expense (income)																	(1.5	)		-68.2	%		0.1			0.7	%		(1.6	)

Operating loss	$	(0.2	)		-4.7	%	$	(1.1	)		-9.5	%	$	0.9		$	(0.1	)		-4.5	%	$	(4.7	)		-33.6	%	$	4.6

Net sales and operating highlights were as follows:

Net sales decreased ~~$7.3~~$11.8 million from the comparable period in the prior year on lower volume in Construction Services, which the Company is exiting.

Operating loss of $0.1 million in the current period was driven primarily by losses within Construction Services.

Six Months Year-to-Date - Fiscal 2016 Compared to Fiscal 2015

Consolidated Operations

The following table presents consolidated operating results for the periods indicated:


	Six Months Ended November 30,
(Dollars in millions)	2015			% of Net sales			2014			% of Net sales			Increase/ (Decrease)
Net sales	$	1,458.0			100.0	%	$	1,733.4			100.0	%	$	(275.4	)
Cost of goods sold		1,235.8			84.8	%		1,478.7			85.3	%		(242.9	)

Gross margin		222.2			15.2	%		254.7			14.7	%		(32.5	)
Selling, general and administrative expense		148.6			10.2	%		152.6			8.8	%		(4.0	)
Impairment of long-lived assets		26.0			1.8	%		16.2			0.9	%		9.8
Restructuring and other expense		4.6			0.3	%		0.5			0.0	%		4.1

Operating income		43.0			2.9	%		85.4			4.9	%		(42.4	)
Miscellaneous income		0.5			0.0	%		1.5			0.1	%		(1.0	)
Interest expense		(15.7	)		-1.1	%		(19.2	)		-1.1	%		3.5
Equity in net income of unconsolidated affiliates (1)		55.8			3.8	%		50.2			2.9	%		5.6
Income tax expense		(23.5	)		-1.6	%		(37.7	)		-2.2	%		(14.2	)

Net earnings		60.1			4.1	%		80.2			4.6	%		(20.1	)
Net earnings attributable to noncontrolling interests		5.4			0.4	%		6.6			0.4	%		1.2

Net earnings attributable to controlling interest	$	54.7			3.8	%	$	73.6			4.2	%	$	(18.9	)


(1) Equity income by unconsolidated affiliate
WAVE	$	41.2					$	38.7					$	2.5
ClarkDietrich		9.0						2.2						6.8
Serviacero		1.2						3.6						(2.4	)
ArtiFlex		4.2						3.2						1.0
WSP		1.5						2.1						(0.6	)
Other		(1.3	)					0.4						(1.7	)

Total	$	55.8					$	50.2					$	5.6

Net earnings attributable to controlling interest for the six months ended November 30, 2015 decreased $18.9 million from the comparable period in the prior year. Net sales and operating highlights were as follows:

Net sales decreased $275.4 million from the comparable period in the prior year. The decrease was driven by lower volume in nearly all business segments, combined with lower average selling prices in Steel Processing driven by the market decline in steel prices and an unfavorable change in product mix in Engineered Cabs.

Gross margin decreased $32.5 million from the comparable period in the prior year on lower volume and the unfavorable impact of inventory holding losses in Steel Processing in the current period compared to gains in the prior year period. Lower manufacturing expenses partially offset the overall decrease in gross margin.

SG&A expense decreased $4.0 million from the comparable period in the prior year on lower profit sharing and bonus expense.

Impairment charges of $26.0 million consisted of $23.0 million related to the impairment of certain long-lived assets in our Oil & Gas Equipment business and $3.0 million related to the September 30, 2015 closure of the Engineered Cabs facility in Florence, South Carolina. For additional information, refer to “Item 1. – Financial Statements – Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements – NOTE C – Impairment of Long-Lived Assets” of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

Restructuring and other expense of $4.6 million in the current period consisted of $2.3 million in net restructuring charges in Steel Processing primarily tied to the ongoing closure of PSM ($5.3 million) and a net gain related to the disposal of the remaining fixed assets of our legacy Baltimore steel processing facility ($3.0 million). The remaining restructuring activity in the current quarter consisted of $1.5 million of gains from the sale of real estate in our legacy metal framing business and $2.6 million of severance and facility exit costs related to the closure of the Florence facility in Engineered Cabs.

Interest expense of $15.7 million was $3.5 million lower than the comparable period in the prior year. The decrease was driven by lower average debt levels, partially due to the lower market price of steel favorably impacting working capital, combined with the repayment of $100 million of unsecured floating rate notes in December 2014.

Equity income increased $5.6 million over the prior year period to $55.8 million on net sales of $793.6 million. The equity portion of income from WAVE, ClarkDietrich and ArtiFlex exceeded the prior year period by $2.5 million, $6.8 million and $1.0 million, respectively, and ClarkDietrich was still up $2.8 million after excluding the impact of a $4.0 million legal settlement related to successful disparagement litigation against several competitors in an industry trade association. These increases were partially offset by $1.7 million of product development expenses related to the alternative fuels business and lower earnings at Serviacero, which fell $2.4 million as a result of declining steel prices. For additional financial information regarding our unconsolidated affiliates, refer to “Item 1. – Financial Statements – Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements – NOTE B – Investments in Unconsolidated Affiliates” of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

Income tax expense decreased $14.2 million from the comparable period in the prior year due to lower earnings resulting primarily from the impact of impairment charges recorded in the current year. Tax expense of $23.5 million for the six months was calculated using an estimated annual effective rate of 31.2% versus 33.5% in the prior year comparable period. See “Item 1. – Financial Statements – Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements – NOTE K – Income Taxes” of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for more information on our tax rates.

Segment Operations

Steel Processing

The following table presents a summary of operating results for our Steel Processing operating segment for the periods indicated:


	Six Months Ended November 30,
(Dollars in millions)	2015		% of Net sales			2014			% of Net sales			Increase/ (Decrease)
Net sales	$	958.6		100.0	%	$	1,105.1			100.0	%	$	(146.5	)
Cost of goods sold		839.8		87.6	%		970.2			87.8	%		(130.4	)

Gross margin		118.8		12.4	%		134.9			12.2	%		(16.1	)
Selling, general and administrative expense		65.8		6.9	%		62.2			5.6	%		3.6
Impairment of long-lived assets		-		0.0	%		3.1			0.3	%		(3.1	)
Restructuring and other expense (income)		2.7		0.3	%		(0.1	)		0.0	%		2.8

Operating income	$	50.3		5.2	%	$	69.7			6.3	%	$	(19.4	)

Material cost	$	670.8				$	795.6					$	(124.8	)
Tons shipped (in thousands)		1,695					1,804						(109	)

Net sales and operating highlights were as follows:

Net sales decreased $146.5 million from the comparable period in the prior year on lower volume and lower average selling prices. Declining steel prices led to lower average selling prices, which reduced net sales by $126.7 million. Volume also declined in the current period reducing net sales by an additional $19.8 million as lower tolling volume more than offset contributions from the recent acquisition of Rome Strip Steel. The mix of direct versus toll tons processed was 64% to 36% compared to 60% to 40% in the comparable period of fiscal 2015.

Operating income decreased $19.4 million from the comparable period in the prior year due primarily to the combined impact of lower volume and a decrease in spread between average selling prices and material cost and the unfavorable impact of inventory holding losses in Steel Processing in the current period

compared to gains in the prior year period. However, a $2.6 million credit in material cost related to successful price-fixing litigation against certain steel mills led to an increase in gross margin as a percent of sales. Restructuring and other expense in the current period consisted primarily of costs related to the ongoing closure of PSM ($5.3 million) and a net gain related to the disposal of the remaining fixed assets of our legacy Baltimore steel processing facility ($3.0 million). The $3.1 million impairment charge in the prior year period related to the ongoing closure of the PSM facility.

Pressure Cylinders

The following table presents a summary of operating results for our Pressure Cylinders operating segment for the periods indicated:


	Six Months Ended November 30,
(Dollars in millions)	2015		% of Net sales			2014		% of Net sales			Increase/ (Decrease)
Net sales	$	425.6		100.0	%	$	501.7		100.0	%	$	(76.1	)
Cost of goods sold		324.6		76.3	%		391.6		78.1	%		(67.0	)

Gross margin		101.0		23.7	%		110.1		21.9	%		(9.1	)
Selling, general and administrative expense		70.8		16.6	%		70.9		14.1	%		(0.1	)
Impairment of long-lived assets		23.0		5.4	%		9.6		1.9	%		13.4
Restructuring and other expense		0.7		0.2	%		0.4		0.1	%		0.3

Operating income	$	6.5		1.5	%	$	29.2		5.8	%	$	(22.7	)


Material cost	$	184.6				$	234.3				$	(49.7	)

Net sales by principal class of products:
Consumer Products	$	104.5				$	107.0				$	(2.5	)
Industrial Products*		202.7					201.3					1.4
Mississippi*		-					13.2					(13.2	)
Alternative Fuels		48.8					44.6					4.2
Oil & Gas Equipment		57.9					124.2					(66.3	)
Cryogenics		11.7					11.4					0.3

Total Pressure Cylinders	$	425.6				$	501.7				$	(76.1	)


Units shipped by principal class of products:
Consumer Products		22,501,637					23,586,725					(1,085,088	)
Industrial Products*		13,074,691					12,668,561					406,130
Mississippi*		-					2,987,407					(2,987,407	)
Alternative Fuels		199,077					211,389					(12,312	)
Oil & Gas Equipment		2,364					5,981					(3,617	)
Cryogenics		464					369					95

Total Pressure Cylinders		35,778,233					39,460,432					(3,682,199	)

*	Mississippi, an industrial gas facility, was sold in May 2015. It has been broken out so as not to distort the Industrial Products comparisons as the products previously produced at the Mississippi facility have been discontinued.

Net sales and operating highlights were as follows:

Net sales decreased $76.1 million over the comparable period in the prior year on lower volume, particularly in the Oil & Gas Equipment business. Volumes in the current quarter were also negatively impacted by the May 2015 disposition of our high-pressure cylinders business in Mississippi.

Operating income decreased $22.7 million from the comparable period in the prior year as declines in Oil & Gas Equipment more than offset improvements in the Industrial Products and Consumer Products businesses resulting from lower manufacturing costs and an improved product mix. Impairment charges in the current period related to the write-off of certain long-lived assets in the Oil & Gas Equipment business.

Engineered Cabs

The following table presents a summary of operating results for our Engineered Cabs operating segment for the periods indicated:


	Six Months Ended November 30,
(Dollars in millions)	2015			% of Net sales			2014			% of Net sales			Increase/ (Decrease)
Net sales	$	67.3			100.0	%	$	101.1			100.0	%	$	(33.8	)
Cost of goods sold		65.0			96.6	%		92.6			91.6	%		(27.6	)

Gross margin		2.3			3.4	%		8.5			8.4	%		(6.2	)
Selling, general and administrative expense		10.3			15.3	%		13.9			13.7	%		(3.6	)
Impairment of long-lived assets		3.0			4.5	%		2.4			2.4	%		0.6
Restructuring and other expense		2.6			3.9	%		-			0.0	%		2.6

Operating loss	$	(13.6	)		-20.2	%	$	(7.8	)		-7.7	%	$	(5.8	)


Material cost	$	31.4					$	45.7					$	(14.3	)

Net sales and operating highlights were as follows:

Net sales decreased $33.8 million over the comparable period in the prior year due to declines in market demand in most lines of business combined with the impact of the January 2015 sale of the assets of Advanced Component Technologies, Inc.

Operating loss increased $5.8 million to $13.6 million due to higher impairment and restructuring charges and the unfavorable impact of lower volume. Impairment and restructuring charges totaled $5.6 million in the current period and related to the closure of the Florence facility.

Other


	Six Months Ended November 30,
(Dollars in millions)	2015			% of Net sales			2014			% of Net sales			Increase/ (Decrease)
Net sales	$	6.5			100.0	%	$	25.5			100.0	%	$	(19.0	)
Cost of goods sold		6.4			98.5	%		24.4			95.7	%		(18.0	)

Gross margin		0.1			1.5	%		1.1			4.3	%		(1.0	)
Selling, general and administrative expense		1.8			27.7	%		5.5			21.6	%		(3.7	)
Impairment of long-lived assets		-			0.0	%		1.2			4.7	%		(1.2	)
Restructuring and other expense (income)		(1.5	)		-23.1	%		0.2			0.8	%		(1.7	)

Operating loss	$	(0.2	)		-3.1	%	$	(5.8	)		-22.7	%	$	5.6

Net sales and operating highlights were as follows:

Net sales decreased $19.0 million from the comparable period in the prior year on lower volume in Construction Services, which the Company is exiting.

Operating loss of $0.2 million in the current period was driven primarily by losses within Construction Services.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

During the ~~three~~six months ended ~~August 31,~~November 30, 2015, we generated ~~$137.8~~$188.4 million of cash from operating activities, invested ~~$38.5~~$60.5 million in property, plant and equipment and paid dividends of ~~$11.6~~$23.6 million on our common shares.

Additionally, we paid ~~$27.6~~$71.5 million to repurchase ~~1,000,000~~2,500,000 of our common shares. The following table summarizes our consolidated cash flows for the ~~three~~six months ended ~~August 31,~~November 30, 2015 and 2014:


	Three Months Ended August 31,						Six Months Ended November 30,
(in millions)	2015			2014			2015			2014
Net cash provided by operating activities	$	137.8		$	54.5		$	188.4		$	55.9
Net cash used by investing activities		(40.1	)		(69.0	)		(55.9	)		(108.0	)
Net cash used by financing activities		(110.0	)		(28.7	)		(136.2	)		(41.4	)

Decrease in cash and cash equivalents		(12.3	)		(43.2	)		(3.7	)		(93.5	)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period		31.1			190.1			31.1			190.1

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	18.8		$	146.9		$	27.4		$	96.6

We believe we have access to adequate resources to meet our needs for normal operating costs, mandatory capital expenditures and debt redemptions, dividend payments and working capital for our existing businesses. These resources include cash and cash equivalents, cash provided by operating activities and unused lines of credit. We also believe that we have adequate access to the financial markets to allow us to be in a position to sell long-term debt or equity securities. However, uncertainty and volatility in the financial markets may impact our ability to access capital and the terms under which we can do so.

The cash and cash equivalents balance at August 31, 2015 included $4.4 million of cash held by subsidiaries outside of the United States that the Company intends to indefinitely reinvest. Although the majority of this cash is available for repatriation, bringing the money into the United States could trigger federal, state and local income tax obligations. We do not have any intentions to repatriate this cash.

Operating Activities

Our business is cyclical and cash flows from operating activities may fluctuate during the year and from year to year due to economic conditions. We rely on cash and short-term borrowings to meet cyclical increases in working capital needs. These needs generally rise during periods of increased economic activity or increasing raw material prices due to higher levels of inventory and accounts receivable. During economic slowdowns, or periods of decreasing raw material costs, working capital needs generally decrease as a result of the reduction of inventories and accounts receivable.

Net cash provided by operating activities was ~~$137.8~~$188.4 million during the ~~three~~six months ended ~~August 31,~~November 30, 2015 compared to ~~$54.5~~$55.9 million in the comparable period of fiscal 2015. The increase was driven primarily by declining working capital levels as a result of lower steel prices.

Investing Activities

Net cash used by investing activities was ~~$40.1~~$55.9 million during the ~~three~~six months ended ~~August 31,~~November 30, 2015 compared to ~~$69.0~~$108.0 million in the prior year period. The decrease from the prior year period was driven primarily by the absence of acquisitions partially offset by higher capital expenditures. There were no acquisitions completed in the first quarter of fiscal 2016; however, in the comparable period in the prior year, the Company spent a combined $36.6 million, net of cash acquired, for the net assets of Midstream Equipment Fabrication LLC and James Russell Engineering Works, Inc.

Investment activities are largely discretionary, and future investment activities could be reduced significantly, or eliminated, as economic conditions warrant. We assess acquisition opportunities as they arise, and such opportunities may require additional financing. There can be no assurance, however, that any such opportunities will arise, that any such acquisitions will be consummated, or that any needed additional financing will be available on satisfactory terms when required.

Financing Activities

Net cash used by financing activities was ~~$110.0~~$136.2 million during the ~~three~~six months ended ~~August 31,~~November 30, 2015 compared to ~~$28.7~~$41.4 million in the prior year period. ~~Short-term borrowings declined $68.5 million during~~During the first ~~quarter~~six months of fiscal 2016, ~~as the $60.0 million outstanding under our revolving trade accounts receivable securitization facility (the “AR Facility”) at May 31, 2015, was paid in full. Additionally,~~ we paid ~~$27.6~~$71.5 million to repurchase ~~1,000,000~~2,500,000 of our common shares, reduced short-term borrowings by $41.0 million and paid dividends of ~~$11.6~~$23.6 million on our common shares.

As of ~~August 31,~~November 30, 2015, we were in compliance with our short-term and long-term debt covenants. These debt agreements do not include credit rating triggers or material adverse change provisions. Our credit ratings at ~~August 31,~~November 30, 2015 were unchanged from those reported as of May 31, 2015.

Common shares - The Board declared a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per common share ~~for~~during the first ~~quarter~~and second quarters of fiscal 2016 compared to $0.18 per common share ~~for~~during the ~~first quarter~~comparable periods of fiscal 2015. Dividends paid on our common shares totaled ~~$11.6~~$23.6 million and $22.3 million during the ~~three~~six months ended ~~August 31,~~November 30, 2015 ~~compared to $10.1 million in the prior year period.~~and 2014, respectively. On ~~September 23,~~December 16, 2015, the Board declared a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per common share payable on ~~December~~March 29, ~~2015~~2016 to shareholders of record on ~~December~~March 15, ~~2015.~~2016.

On June 25, 2014, the Board authorized the repurchase of up to 10,000,000 of our outstanding common shares. A total of ~~3,453,855~~4,953,855 common shares have been repurchased under this authorization, including ~~1,000,000~~2,500,000 during the first ~~quarter~~six months of fiscal 2016, leaving ~~6,546,145~~5,046,145 common shares available for repurchase.

The common shares available for repurchase under this authorization may be purchased from time to time, with consideration given to the market price of the common shares, the nature of other investment opportunities, cash flows from operations, general economic conditions and other relevant considerations. Repurchases may be made on the open market or through privately negotiated transactions.

Dividend Policy

We currently have no material contractual or regulatory restrictions on the payment of dividends. Dividends are declared at the discretion of the Board. The Board reviews the dividend quarterly and establishes the dividend rate based upon our consolidated financial condition, results of operations, capital requirements, current and projected cash flows, business prospects and other relevant factors. While we have paid a dividend every quarter since becoming a public company in 1968, there is no guarantee that payments will continue in the future.

Contractual Cash Obligations and Other Commercial Commitments

Our contractual cash obligations and other commercial commitments have not changed significantly from those disclosed in “Part II – Item 7. – Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Contractual Cash Obligations and Other Commercial Commitments” of our 2015 Form 10-K, other than the changes in borrowings, as described in “Part I – Item 1. – Financial Statements - NOTE G – Debt and Receivables Securitization” of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We do not have guarantees or other off-balance sheet financing arrangements that we believe are reasonably likely to have a material current or future effect on our consolidated financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources. However, as of ~~August 31,~~November 30, 2015, we were party to an operating lease for an aircraft in which we have guaranteed a residual value at the termination of the lease. The maximum obligation under the terms of this guarantee was approximately ~~$11.4~~$11.1 million at ~~August 31,~~November 30, 2015. We have also guaranteed the repayment of a $0.8 million term loan ~~entered into~~held by ~~our~~ArtiFlex, an unconsolidated affiliate, ArtiFlex, which had $1.3 million outstanding at August 31, 2015. In addition, we had in place approximately $16.2 million of outstanding letters of credit at August 31, 2015. These letters of credit were issued to third-party service providers and had no amounts drawn against them at August 31, 2015.joint venture. Based on current facts and circumstances, we have estimated the likelihood of payment pursuant to these guarantees and determined that the fair value of our obligation under each guarantee based on those likely outcomes is not material.

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

In July 2015, amended accounting guidance was issued regarding the measurement of inventory. The amended guidance requires that inventory accounted for under the first-in, first-out (FIFO) or average cost methods be measured at the lower of cost and net realizable value, where net realizable value represents the estimated selling price of inventory in the ordinary course of business, less reasonably predictable costs of completion, disposal, and transportation. The amended guidance has no impact on inventory accounted for under the last-in, first-out (LIFO) or retail inventory methods. For public business entities, the amended guidance is effective prospectively for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Early application is permitted as of the beginning of an interim or annual reporting period. We are in the process of evaluating the effect this guidance will have on our consolidated financial position and results of operations, and we have not determined the effect of the amended guidance on our ongoing financial reporting.

Critical Accounting Policies

The discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations is based upon our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP. The preparation of these consolidated financial statements requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. We continually evaluate our estimates, including those related to our valuation of receivables, intangible assets, accrued liabilities, income and other tax accruals, and contingencies and litigation. We base our estimates on historical experience and various other assumptions that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances. These results form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily obtained from other sources. Critical accounting policies are defined as those that require our significant judgments and involve uncertainties that could

potentially result in materially different results under different assumptions and conditions. Although actual results historically have not deviated significantly from those determined using our estimates, our financial position or results of operations could be materially different if we were to report under different conditions or to use different assumptions in the application of such policies. Our critical accounting policies have not significantly changed from those discussed in “Part II – Item 7. – Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Critical Accounting Policies” of our 2015 Form 10-K.

We review our receivables on an ongoing basis to ensure they are properly valued. Based on this review, we believe our reserve for doubtful accounts is adequate. However, if the economic environment and market conditions deteriorate, particularly in the automotive and construction markets where our exposure is greatest, additional reserves may be required. We recognize revenue upon transfer of title and risk of loss provided evidence of an arrangement exists, pricing is fixed and determinable, and the ability to collect is probable. In circumstances where the collection of payment is not probable at the time of shipment, we defer recognition of revenue until payment is collected.

~~On March 24, 2015, the Company announced its decision to close its Engineered Cabs facility in Florence, South Carolina.~~ During the first quarter of fiscal 2016, management finalized its plan to close the Engineered Cabs facility in Florence, South Carolina, and transfer the majority of the business to ~~its~~the Engineered Cabs facility in Greeneville, Tennessee. ~~Certain~~Under the plan, certain machinery and equipment will ~~be transferred~~transfer to the Greeneville facility to support the higher volume requirements and the remaining long-lived assets will be liquidated. ~~For the assets to be liquidated, this represents a change in intended use.~~ As a result of these developments, management ~~evaluated~~reevaluated the recoverability of ~~these assets~~the asset group and determined that long-lived assets with a carrying value of $4.1 million were ~~no longer recoverable and were in fact~~ impaired. As a result, these long-lived assets were written down to their estimated fair value of $1.1 million resulting in an impairment charge of $3.0 million during the ~~three~~six months ended ~~August 31,~~November 30, 2015. The Company ceased production at the Florence facility on September 30, 2015.

recovered as of those measurement dates.

~~The~~During the second quarter of fiscal 2016, the continued decline of oil prices further reduced the demand for our Oil & Gas Equipment products, causing a significant decrease in the Company’s long-term cash flow projections of the business. Based on these revised cash flow projections, the Company determined that two of the asset groups with a total carrying amount of $59.9 million were impaired and wrote them down to their estimated ~~undiscounted~~fair value of $36.9 million. Fair value was based on expected future cash flows ~~for each plant were significantly higher than their respective carrying values except~~using Level 3 inputs under Accounting Standard Codification (“ASC”) 820. The cash flows are those expected to be generated by market participants, discounted at a 13% discount rate to account for the ~~Garden City, Kansas, location, which had total long-lived assets~~risks inherent in those cash flow projections. Because of ~~$36.7 million at August 31, 2015. The estimated undiscounted future cash flows for this location exceeded book value by less than 5%. It~~deteriorating market conditions (i.e. rising interest rates and lower marketplace demand), it is reasonably possible that ~~in the future the~~our estimate of ~~undiscounted~~discounted cash flows may change resulting in the need to ~~write down these~~perform additional impairment testing.

As a result of the impairment of the Oil & Gas Equipment assets ~~to fair value.~~

~~Goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite lives are not amortized, but instead are tested for~~noted above, the Company also performed an impairment ~~annually,~~review of the goodwill of the Pressure Cylinders reporting unit during the ~~fourth~~second quarter ~~or more frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate~~of fiscal 2016. The Company first reviewed the reporting unit structure and determined that ~~impairment may be present. Application~~it was no longer appropriate to aggregate the Oil & Gas Equipment component with the rest of the Pressure Cylinders components for purposes of goodwill impairment ~~testing involves judgment, including but not limited to,~~testing. This determination was driven by changes in the identification of reporting units and the estimation of the fair value of each reporting unit. A reporting unit is defined as an operating segment or one level below an operating segment. We test goodwill at the operating segment level as we have determined that theeconomic characteristics of the ~~reporting units within each operating segment~~Oil & Gas Equipment business as a result of sustained low oil prices, which now indicate that the risk profile and prospects for growth and profitability of the Oil & Gas Equipment component are no longer similar ~~and allow for their aggregation in~~to the other components of our Pressure Cylinders businesses. In accordance with the applicable accounting ~~guidance.~~

~~The~~guidance, the Company allocated a portion of Pressure Cylinders goodwill ~~impairment test consists~~totaling $26.0 million to Oil & Gas Equipment using a relative fair value approach. A subsequent comparison of ~~comparing~~ the fair ~~value~~values of ~~each operating segment,~~the Oil & Gas Equipment and Pressure Cylinders reporting units, determined using discounted cash flows, to ~~each operating segment’s~~their respective carrying ~~value. If the estimated fair value of an operating segment exceeds its carrying value, there is no impairment. If the carrying amount of the operating segment exceeds its estimated fair value,~~values indicated that a ~~goodwill~~step 2 calculation to quantify a potential impairment ~~is indicated.~~was not required. The ~~amount of the impairment is determined by comparing~~key assumptions that drive the fair value calculations are projected cash flows and the discount rate. Prior to the allocation of goodwill, the Company tested the goodwill of the ~~net assets of the operating segment, excluding goodwill, to its estimated~~old Pressure Cylinders reporting unit for impairment and determined that fair value ~~with the difference representing the implied fair value of the goodwill. If the implied fair value of the goodwill is lower than its~~exceeded carrying value the difference is recorded as an impairment charge in the applicable consolidated statement of earnings. We performed our annual impairment evaluation of goodwill and other indefinite-lived intangible assets during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2015 and concluded that the fair value of each reporting unit exceeded its carrying value; therefore, no impairment charges were recognized. Additionally, no impairment indicators were present with regard to our goodwill or intangible assets with indefinite useful lives during the three months ended August 31, 2015.by a significant amount.

Item 3. - Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

Market risks have not changed significantly from those disclosed in “Part II - Item 7A. – Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk” of our 2015 Form 10-K.

Item 4. - Controls and Procedures

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

We maintain disclosure controls and procedures [as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”)] that are designed to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our principal executive officer and our principal financial officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

Management, with the participation of our principal executive officer and our principal financial officer, performed an evaluation of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (the fiscal quarter ended ~~August 31,~~November 30, 2015). Based on that evaluation, our principal executive officer and our principal financial officer have concluded that such disclosure controls and procedures were effective at a reasonable assurance level as of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

During the fiscal quarter ended August 31, 2015, the Company implemented a new enterprise performance management system. This system was implemented to increase the overall efficiency of the consolidation and financial reporting processes and not in response to any deficiency or material weakness in internal control over financial reporting. While the Company has not completed the testing of the operating effectiveness of all key controls in the new system, we believe that effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained during and after the conversion. There were no other changes that occurred during the ~~period~~periods covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (the ~~fiscal quarter~~three and six month periods ended ~~August 31,~~November 30, 2015) in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1.- Legal Proceedings

Various legal actions, which generally have arisen in the ordinary course of business, are pending against the Company. None of this pending litigation, individually or collectively, is expected to have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

Item 1A. – Risk Factors

There are certain risks and uncertainties in our business that could cause our actual results to differ materially from those anticipated. In “PART I – Item 1A. — Risk Factors” of the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Worthington Industries, Inc. for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2015 (the “2015 Form 10-K”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on July 30, 2015, and available at www.sec.gov or at www.worthingtonindustries.com, we included a detailed discussion of our risk factors. Our risk factors have not changed significantly from those disclosed in our 2015 Form 10-K. These risk factors should be read carefully in connection with evaluating our business and in connection with the forward-looking statements and other information contained in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. Any of the risks described in our 2015 Form 10-K could materially affect our business, consolidated financial condition or future results and the actual outcome of matters as to which forward-looking statements are made. The risk factors described in our 2015 Form 10-K are not the only risks we face. Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to us, or that we currently deem to be immaterial, also may materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and/or future results.

Item 2. – Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

The following table provides information about purchases made by, or on behalf of, Worthington Industries, Inc. or any “affiliated purchaser” (as defined in Rule 10b-18(a) (3) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) of common shares of Worthington Industries, Inc. during each month of the fiscal quarter ended ~~August 31,~~November 30, 2015:

Period
   Total Number
of Common
Shares
Purchased    Average Price
Paid per
Common
Share    Total Number of
Common Shares
Purchased as
Part of Publicly
Announced
Plans or
Programs    Maximum Number of
Common Shares that
May Yet Be
Purchased Under the
Plans or Programs (1)
June 1-30, 2015 (2)
   70,408       $ 29.32       -       7,546,145
July 1-31, 2015
   280,000       $ 27.97       280,000       7,266,145
August 1-31, 2015 (2)
   726,212       $ 27.43       720,000       6,546,145







Total
   1,076,620       $ 27.69       1,000,000


Period	Total Number of Common Shares Purchased		Average Price Paid per Common Share		Total Number of Common Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs		Maximum Number of Common Shares that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs (1)
September 1-30, 2015		288,300	$	25.89		288,300		6,257,845
October 1-31, 2015		1,050,000	$	29.75		1,050,000		5,207,845
November 1-30, 2015 (2)		168,866	$	32.08		161,700		5,046,145

Total		1,507,166	$	29.27		1,500,000

(1)

The number shown represents, as of the end of each period, the maximum number of common shares that could be purchased under the publicly announced repurchase authorization then in effect. On June 25, 2014, Worthington Industries, Inc. announced that the Board authorized the repurchase of up to 10,000,000 of Worthington Industries’ outstanding common shares. A total of ~~6,546,145~~5,046,145 common shares were available under this repurchase authorization at ~~August 31,~~November 30, 2015.

The common shares available for repurchase under this authorization may be purchased from time to time, with consideration given to the market price of the common shares, the nature of other investment opportunities, cash flows from operations, general economic conditions and other appropriate factors. Repurchases may be made on the open market or through privately negotiated transactions.

(2)

Includes an aggregate of ~~70,408 and 6,212~~7,166 common shares surrendered by employees in ~~June~~November 2015 ~~and August 2015, respectively,~~ to satisfy tax withholding obligations upon exercise of stock ~~options and vesting of restricted common shares.~~options. These common shares were not counted against the share repurchase authorization in effect throughout the ~~first~~second quarter of fiscal 2016 and discussed in footnote (1) above.

Item 3. – Defaults Upon Senior Securities

Not applicable

Item 4. – Mine Safety Disclosures

Not applicable

Item 5. – Other Information

Not applicable

Item 6. – Exhibits



		~~4.1~~		Amendment No. 1 to Note Agreement, dated June 10, 2015, among Worthington Industries, Inc., on the one hand, and The Prudential Insurance Company of America, Pruco Life Insurance Company of New Jersey, Pruco Life Insurance Company, Prudential Arizona Reinsurance Universal Company, Prudential Annuities Life Assurance Corporation, The Prudential Life Assurance Company, Ltd. and The Gibraltar Life Insurance Co., Ltd., on the other hand (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.9 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Worthington Industries, Inc. for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2015 (SEC File No. 1-8399))

		~~10.1~~		Summary of Annual Base Salaries Approved for Named Executive Officers of Worthington Industries, Inc. (effective September 2015) (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.69 to the Annual Report on Form~~10-K~~ ~~of Worthington Industries, Inc. for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2015 (SEC File No. 1-8399))~~

		~~10.2~~		Summary of Annual Cash Incentive Bonus Awards, Long-Term Performance Awards, Stock Options and Restricted Common Shares Granted in Fiscal 2016 for Named Executive Officers (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.74 to the Annual Report on Form~~10-K~~ ~~of Worthington Industries, Inc. for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2015 (SEC File No. 1-8399))~~

		31.1		Rule 13a - 14(a) / 15d - 14(a) Certifications (Principal Executive Officer) *

		31.2		Rule 13a - 14(a) / 15d - 14(a) Certifications (Principal Financial Officer) *

		32.1		Certifications of Principal Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

		32.2		Certifications of Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

		101.INS		XBRL Instance Document #

		101.SCH		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document #

		101.PRE		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document #

		101.LAB		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document #

		101.CAL		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document #

		101.DEF		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document #

*	Filed herewith.

**	Furnished herewith.

#
Attached as Exhibit 101 to this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Worthington Industries, Inc. are the following documents formatted in XBRL (Extensible Business Reporting Language):
(i)
Consolidated Balance Sheets at ~~August 31,~~November 30, 2015 and May 31, 2015;
(ii)
Consolidated Statements of Earnings for the three months and six months ended ~~August 31,~~November 30, 2015 and ~~August 31,~~November 30, 2014;
(iii)
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the three months and six months ended ~~August 31,~~November 30, 2015 and ~~August 31,~~November 30, 2014;
(iv)
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the three months and six months ended ~~August 31,~~November 30, 2015 and ~~August 31,~~November 30, 2014; and
(v)
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.


	WORTHINGTON INDUSTRIES, INC.

Date: ~~October 13, 2015~~January 11, 2016	By:	/s/ B. Andrew Rose
	B. Andrew Rose, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (On behalf of the Registrant and as Principal Financial Officer)

INDEX TO EXHIBITS


Exhibit No.	Description	Location

~~4.1~~	Amendment No. 1 to Note Agreement, dated June 10, 2015, among Worthington Industries, Inc., on the one hand, and The Prudential Insurance Company of America, Pruco Life Insurance Company of New Jersey, Pruco Life Insurance Company, Prudential Arizona Reinsurance Universal Company, Prudential Annuities Life Assurance Corporation, The Prudential Life Assurance Company, Ltd. and The Gibraltar Life Insurance Co., Ltd., on the other hand	~~Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.9 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Worthington Industries, Inc. for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2015 (SEC File No. 1-8399)~~

~~10.1~~	~~Summary of Annual Base Salaries Approved for Named Executive Officers of Worthington Industries, Inc. (effective September 2015)~~	~~Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.69 to the Annual Report on Form10-K~~ ~~of Worthington Industries, Inc. for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2015 (SEC File No. 1-8399)~~

~~10.2~~	~~Summary of Annual Cash Incentive Bonus Awards, Long-Term Performance Awards, Stock Options and Restricted Common Shares Granted in Fiscal 2016 for Named Executive Officers~~	~~Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.74 to the Annual Report on Form10-K~~ ~~of Worthington Industries, Inc. for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2015 (SEC File No. 1-8399)~~

31.1	Rule 13a - 14(a) / 15d - 14(a) Certifications (Principal Executive Officer)	Filed herewith

31.2	Rule 13a - 14(a) / 15d - 14(a) Certifications (Principal Financial Officer)	Filed herewith

32.1	Certifications of Principal Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002	Furnished herewith

32.2	Certifications of Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002	Furnished herewith

101.INS	XBRL Instance Document	Submitted electronically herewith #

101.SCH	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document	Submitted electronically herewith #

101.PRE	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document	Submitted electronically herewith #

101.LAB	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document	Submitted electronically herewith #

101.CAL	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document	Submitted electronically herewith #

101.DEF	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document	Submitted electronically herewith #

#
Attached as Exhibit 101 to this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Worthington Industries, Inc. are the following documents formatted in XBRL (Extensible Business Reporting Language):

(i)

Consolidated Balance Sheets at ~~August 31,~~November 30, 2015 and May 31, 2015;

(ii)

Consolidated Statements of Earnings for the three months and six months ended ~~August 31,~~November 30, 2015 and ~~August 31,~~November 30, 2014;

(iii)

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the three months and six months ended ~~August 31,~~November 30, 2015 and ~~August 31,~~November 30, 2014;

(iv)

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the three months and six months ended ~~August 31,~~November 30, 2015 and ~~August 31,~~November 30, 2014; and

(v)

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

3642


(in thousands)	Notional Amount		Maturity Date
Commodity contracts	$	78,081	September 2015 - December 2016
Interest rate contracts		17,153	September 2019