(Former Name, Former Address and Former Fiscal year, if changed since last report)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No x

The number of shares outstanding of the registrant’s common stock as of October ~~26, 2015~~24, 2016 was ~~39,906,001.~~41,626,782.


	September 30, 2015			December 31, 2014			September 30, 2016			December 31, 2015
Assets
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	86,315		$	90,325		$	97,583		$	87,520
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $300 at September 30, 2015 and $164 at December 31, 2014		18,460			9,279
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $331 at September 30, 2016 and $264 at December 31, 2015								18,091			15,179
Income tax refunds receivable		2,845			2,593			2,457			2,558
Deferred income taxes		2,409			2,898
Prepaid expense and other current assets		3,590			4,361			7,392			3,846

Total current assets		113,619			109,456			125,523			109,103
Property and equipment, net		15,305			10,578			14,551			15,204
Goodwill		187,136			176,999			275,134			185,735
Intangible assets, net		71,611			73,862			96,454			69,264
Restricted cash								18,331			9,304
Other assets		2,490			3,563			2,872			3,177

Total assets	$	390,161		$	374,458		$	532,865		$	391,787

Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable	$	1,779		$	1,156		$	1,376		$	1,385
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities		21,775			24,570			26,058			21,422
Accrued income taxes payable		1,069			640			2,193			2,395
Deferred revenue		11,180			7,107			11,083			10,086

Total current liabilities		35,803			33,473			40,710			35,288
Revolving line of credit								110,000			—
Other long-term liabilities		3,655			2,326			9,655			6,914
Contingent acquisition consideration		5,055			270
Deferred income taxes		35,218			32,960			41,669			35,159
Reserve for income taxes, net of current portion		3,392			4,637			2,423			2,316
Accrued pension benefits		5,418			5,679			5,197			4,928
Commitments and contingencies(Note 15)
Commitments and contingencies(Note 13)
Stockholders’ equity:
Preferred stock, $0.001 par value, Authorized shares: 10,000,000; Issued and outstanding: none		—			—			—			—
Common stock, $0.001 par value, Authorized shares: 250,000,000; Issued: 41,875,191 shares at September 30, 2015 and 40,770,197 shares at December 31, 2014		41			39
Common stock, $0.001 par value, Authorized shares: 250,000,000; Issued: 43,670,938 shares at September 30, 2016 and 42,019,646 shares at December 31, 2015								43			42
Additional paid-in capital		250,764			232,522			270,664			256,215
Treasury stock, at cost, 1,991,848 shares at September 30, 2015 and 1,303,737 shares at December 31, 2014		(50,455	)		(31,946	)
Treasury stock, at cost, 2,078,965 shares at September 30, 2016 and 1,999,354 shares at December 31, 2015								(50,481	)		(50,455	)
Retained earnings		108,013			98,672			109,810			108,908
Accumulated other comprehensive loss		(6,743	)		(4,174	)		(6,825	)		(7,528	)

Total stockholders’ equity		301,620			295,113			323,211			307,182

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	390,161		$	374,458		$	532,865		$	391,787

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.


	Three Months Ended September 30,						Nine Months Ended September 30,						Three Months Ended September 30,						Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2015			2014			2015			2014			2016			2015			2016			2015
Revenue	$	49,352		$	47,063		$	141,803		$	138,098		$	52,229		$	49,352		$	150,804		$	141,803
Costs and expenses:
Cost of revenue		7,351			7,227			22,314			21,057			8,534			7,351			24,441			22,314
Cost of revenue—amortization of acquired technology		1,048			1,144			3,315			3,435			1,327			1,048			3,589			3,315

Total cost of revenue		8,399			8,371			25,629			24,492			9,861			8,399			28,030			25,629

Gross profit		40,953			38,692			116,174			113,606			42,368			40,953			122,774			116,174
Operating expenses:
Marketing and selling		15,472			13,361			42,980			36,466			16,538			15,472			45,273			42,980
Research and development		5,155			5,227			16,244			15,890			7,781			5,155			21,108			16,244
General and administrative		8,171			6,491			22,080			18,075			11,353			8,171			28,840			22,080
Amortization of other intangible assets		862			1,587			2,354			4,450			941			862			2,418			2,354

Total operating expenses		29,660			26,666			83,658			74,881			36,613			29,660			97,639			83,658

Income from operations		11,293			12,026			32,516			38,725			5,755			11,293			25,135			32,516
Other (income) expense:
Interest expense		253			298			801			832			429			253			753			801
Interest income		(16	)		(33	)		(26	)		(41	)		(78	)		(16	)		(204	)		(26	)
Loss on foreign exchange		44			817			656			987			360			44			794			656
Gain on derivatives		(120	)		(247	)		(48	)		(33	)		(93	)		(120	)		(299	)		(48	)
Loss on extinguishment of debt		112			—			112			—			—			112			—			112
Other expense, net		6			50			4			46			5			6			(16	)		4

Total other expense		279			885			1,499			1,791			623			279			1,028			1,499

Income before provision for income taxes		11,014			11,141			31,017			36,934			5,132			11,014			24,107			31,017
Provision for income taxes		2,975			4,102			9,717			13,759			2,707			2,975			9,671			9,717

Net income	$	8,039		$	7,039		$	21,300		$	23,175		$	2,425		$	8,039		$	14,436		$	21,300

Net income available to common shareholders—basic	$	7,837		$	6,899		$	20,799		$	22,745		$	2,341		$	7,837		$	13,982		$	20,799

Net income available to common shareholders—diluted	$	7,838		$	6,899		$	20,802		$	22,745		$	2,340		$	7,838		$	13,983		$	20,802

Net income per common share:
Basic	$	0.20		$	0.18		$	0.54		$	0.59		$	0.06		$	0.20		$	0.36		$	0.54

Diluted	$	0.20		$	0.17		$	0.53		$	0.57		$	0.06		$	0.20		$	0.35		$	0.53

Weighted average number of shares:
Basic		38,770,626			38,431,031			38,808,446			38,543,401			39,977,120			38,770,626			39,348,437			38,808,446
Diluted		39,230,783			39,487,302			39,382,558			39,663,807			40,261,247			39,230,783			39,699,790			39,382,558
Dividends declared per common share	$	0.10		$	0.08		$	0.30		$	0.24		$	0.11		$	0.10		$	0.33		$	0.30

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.


	Three Months Ended September 30,						Nine Months Ended September 30,						Three Months Ended September 30,					Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2015			2014			2015			2014			2016		2015			2016		2015
Net income	$	8,039		$	7,039		$	21,300		$	23,175		$	2,425	$	8,039		$	14,436	$	21,300
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax:
Foreign currency translation adjustments		(23	)		(2,868	)		(2,569	)		(3,029	)
Unrecognized actuarial gain, net of tax of $4, $0, $12 and $0, respectively														9		—			26		—
Foreign currency translation adjustments, net of tax of $118, $546, $688 and $(932), respectively														131		(23	)		677		(2,569	)

Comprehensive income	$	8,016		$	4,171		$	18,731		$	20,146		$	2,565	$	8,016		$	15,139	$	18,731

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.


	Nine Months Ended September 30,						Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2015			2014			2016			2015
Cash flows from operating activities
Net income	$	21,300		$	23,175		$	14,436		$	21,300
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization		7,906			9,147			9,114			7,906
Loss on retirement of fixed assets		20			78			—			20
Loss on debt extinguishment		112			—			—			112
Amortization of deferred financing costs and accreted interest		374			337			165			374
Adjustment to contingent consideration		—			(1,152	)
Share based compensation		9,841			7,835			12,705			9,841
Excess tax benefit on stock options		(1,692	)		(3,011	)		(404	)		(1,692	)
Provision for doubtful accounts		210			29			216			210
Deferred income taxes		2,578			2,202			2,312			2,578
Unrealized currency loss on foreign denominated intercompany transactions		161			423			422			161
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable		(9,385	)		(366	)		(372	)		(9,385	)
Prepaid expenses and other assets		1,500			934			(2,778	)		1,500
Restricted cash								(9,027	)		—
Accounts payable		653			996			(12	)		653
Accrued income taxes payable		1,111			6,493			942			1,111
Accrued expenses and other liabilities		885			(808	)		2,359			885
Deferred revenue		4,678			86			1,869			4,678

Net cash provided by operating activities		40,252			46,398			31,947			40,252

Cash flows from investing activities
Purchases of property and equipment		(7,805	)		(4,474	)		(1,600	)		(7,805	)
Purchases of exclusive license		—			(100	)
Acquisition of business, net of cash acquired		(14,289	)		(10,621	)
Acquisition of businesses, net of cash acquired								(120,444	)		(14,289	)

Net cash used in investing activities		(22,094	)		(15,195	)		(122,044	)		(22,094	)

Cash flows from financing activities
Proceeds from line of credit								110,000			—
Payment of contingent consideration		(289	)		—			—			(289	)
Purchase of treasury stock		(18,601	)		(26,065	)		—			(18,601	)
Common stock dividends paid		(11,128	)		(8,670	)		(12,961	)		(11,128	)
Excess tax benefit on stock options		1,692			3,011			404			1,692
Proceeds from exercises of common stock options		6,627			5,285			2,390			6,627

Net cash used in financing activities		(21,699	)		(26,439	)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities								99,833			(21,699	)
Effect of exchange rates on cash and cash equivalents		(469	)		(587	)		327			(469	)

(Decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents		(4,010	)		4,177
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents								10,063			(4,010	)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period		90,325			78,411			87,520			90,325

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	86,315		$	82,588		$	97,583		$	86,315

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

Monotype Imaging Holdings Inc. (the “Company” or “we”) is a leading provider of type, technology and expertise for creative ~~applications~~professionals and consumer ~~devices.~~device manufacturers. Our end-user and embedded solutions for print, web and mobile environments enable ~~people~~consumers and professionals to create and consume dynamic content ~~on any~~across multiple devices and ~~every device.~~mediums. Our technologies and fonts enable the display and printing of high quality digital text. Our ~~technologies and fonts have been widely deployed across, and embedded in,~~solutions power the visual expression of the leading makers of a wide range of ~~consumer~~ devices, including laser printers, digital copiers, mobile phones, e-book readers, tablets, automotive displays, digital cameras, navigation devices, digital televisions, set-top boxes, ~~and~~ consumer appliances and Internet of Things devices, as well as provide a high-quality text experience in numerous software applications and operating systems. We also provide printer drivers ~~page description language interpreters,~~and printer user interface technology ~~and color imaging solutions~~ to printer manufacturers and OEMs (original equipment manufacturers). We license our fonts and technologies to consumer device manufacturers, independent software vendors and creative and business professionals and we are headquartered in Woburn, Massachusetts. We operate in one business segment: the development, marketing and licensing of technologies and fonts. We also maintain various offices worldwide for selling and marketing, research and development and administration. We conduct our operations through ~~four~~five domestic operating subsidiaries, Monotype Imaging Inc., Monotype ITC Inc., MyFonts Inc. ~~and~~, Swyft Media Inc. and Olapic, Inc., and ~~five~~seven foreign operating subsidiaries, Olapic Argentina S.A., Monotype Ltd., Olapic UK Ltd., Monotype GmbH ~~and its wholly-owned subsidiary, FontShop International Inc.~~(“Monotype Germany”), Monotype Solutions India Pvt. Ltd., Monotype Hong Kong Ltd. and Monotype KK.

The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated interim financial statements as of September 30, ~~2015~~2016 and for the three and nine months ended September 30, ~~2015~~2016 and ~~2014~~2015 include the accounts of the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiaries and have been prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“GAAP”) for interim financial reporting and pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) for Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, such financial statements do not include all of the information and footnotes required by GAAP for complete financial statements. GAAP requires the Company’s management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements. Actual results could differ from those estimates. The results for interim periods are not necessarily indicative of results to be expected for the year or for any future periods.

In management’s opinion, these unaudited condensed consolidated interim financial statements contain all adjustments of a normal recurring nature necessary for a fair presentation of the financial statements for the interim periods presented.

These unaudited condensed consolidated interim financial statements should be read in conjunction with the Company’s audited consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, ~~2014~~2015 as reported in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K.

The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements reflect the application of certain significant accounting policies as described below and elsewhere in these notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements. As of September 30, ~~2015,~~2016, the Company’s significant accounting policies and estimates, which are detailed in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, ~~2014,~~2015, have not changed.

In ~~April 2015,~~March 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board, or FASB, issued Accounting Standards Update, or ASU, ~~2015-05,~~2016-09,~~Intangibles – Goodwill and Other – Internal-Use Software (Subtopic 350-40)~~Compensation—Stock Compensation (Topic 718), ~~Customer’s Accounting~~Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting. ASU 2016-09 identifies areas for ~~Fees Paid in a Cloud Computing Arrangement.~~ASU 2015-05 provides guidance to customers about whether a cloud computing arrangement includes a software license. If a cloud computing arrangement includes a software license, then the customer should account for the software license elementsimplification involving several aspects of the arrangement consistent with the acquisition of other software licenses. If a cloud computing arrangement does not include a software license, the customer should account for the arrangement as a service contract. The guidance will not change GAAP for a customer’s accounting for ~~service contracts. The ASU aims~~share based payments, including income tax consequences, classification of awards as either equity, or liabilities, an option to ~~reduce complexity and diversity in practice. The standard~~make a policy election to recognize gross share based compensation expense with actual forfeitures recognized as they occur as well as certain classification changes on the statement of cash flows. This guidance is effective for ~~the Company on January 1,~~annual and interim reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016, with early adoption permitted. The Company is currently ~~evaluating~~assessing the impact ~~of the adoption of~~that adopting ASU ~~2015-03 on its consolidated financial statements.~~

~~In April 2015, the FASB, issued ASU 2015-03,~~~~Interest – Imputation of Interest (Subtopic 835-30), Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs,~~which provides that debt issuance costs related to a recognized debt liability be presented in the balance sheet as a direct reduction from the carrying amount of the related debt liability, rather than classifying the costs separately in the balance sheet as a deferred charge. The ASU aims to reduce complexity. The standard is effective for the Company on January 1, 2017. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of the adoption of ASU 2015-032016-09 will have on its consolidated financial statements ~~but does not expect the adoption of this standard to have any impact.~~and related disclosures.

In February ~~2015,~~2016, the FASB issued ~~updated accounting guidance on consolidation requirements. This update changes the guidance with respect~~ASU 2016-02,Leases (Topic 842), Amendments to the ~~analysis~~FASB Accounting Standards Codification,which replaces the existing guidance for leases. ASU 2016-02 requires the identification of arrangements that should be accounted for as leases by lessees. In general, for lease arrangements exceeding a ~~reporting entity~~twelve month term, these arrangements must ~~perform~~now be recognized as assets and liabilities on the balance sheet of the lessee. Under ASU 2016-02, a right-of-use asset and lease obligation will be recorded for all leases, whether operating or financing, while the income statement will reflect lease expense for operating leases and amortization/interest expense for financing leases. The balance sheet amount recorded for existing leases at the date of adoption of ASU 2016-02 must be calculated using the applicable incremental borrowing rate at the date of adoption. In addition, ASU 2016-02 requires the use of the modified retrospective method, which will require adjustment to ~~determine whether it should consolidate certain types of legal entities.~~all comparative periods presented in the consolidated financial statements. This guidance is effective for annual ~~periods,~~ and interim ~~periods within those annual~~ periods beginning after December 15, ~~2015, with early adoption permitted.~~2018 and requires retrospective application. The Company ~~does not expect adoption of this guidance to~~is currently assessing the impact that adopting ASU 2016-02 will have ~~a material impact~~ on ~~our~~its consolidated financial ~~statements.~~statements and related disclosures.

In August 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-15,Presentation of Financial ~~Statements –~~ Statements—Going Concern (Subtopic 205-40); Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entity’s Ability to Continue as a Going Concern, which requires management of a company to evaluate whether there is substantial doubt about the company’s ability to continue as a going concern. The ASU provides guidance on evaluating an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern and the content of any required footnote disclosure based on that evaluation. The assessment period is one year after the date of the financial statements are issued. The standard is effective for the Company on January 1, ~~2017. Early~~2017, with early adoption is permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of the adoption of ASU 2014-15, but we do not expect the adoption of this standard to have any impact on ~~its~~our consolidated financial statements.

In May 2014, the FASB and the International Accounting Standards Board jointly issued ASU 2014-9,Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606), which provides a comprehensive new revenue recognition model that requires revenue to be recognized in a manner to depict the transfer of goods or services to a customer at an amount that reflects the consideration expected to be received in exchange for those goods or services. This guidance was effective for annual reporting and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2016 and allows for either full retrospective or modified retrospective application, with early adoption not permitted. In August 2015, the FASB deferred the effective date of this guidance; accordingly, theThe guidance is effective for annual reporting and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2017. Early adoption is permitted for annual and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2016. The Company is currently evaluating the adoption method it will apply, and the impact that this ~~guidance~~standard will have on its financial statements and related disclosures.

On ~~January 30, 2015,~~August 9, 2016, the Company purchased all of the outstanding ~~stock~~shares of ~~TextPride,~~Olapic, Inc. ~~operating under the name of Swyft Media,~~, a privately-held ~~mobile messaging~~ company located in New York, New ~~York. In connection with the acquisition, TextPride, Inc. was renamed Swyft Media Inc.~~York; its wholly-owned subsidiaries Olapic UK Ltd., based in London, England; and ~~became~~Olapic Argentina S.A., based in Córdoba, Argentina (collectively, “Olapic”). Olapic is a ~~wholly-owned subsidiary~~provider of ~~the registrant. Swyft Media’s expertise~~a leading visual commerce platform for collecting, curating, showcasing and measuring crowd sourced photos and videos. Olapic’s Earned Content Platform helps brands collect, curate, use and analyze user-generated content in the ~~emerging world~~form of ~~branded, in-app mobile messaging content is expected~~images and videos in their ecommerce experiences and across multiple marketing channels. This allows consumers to make more educated purchasing decisions, discover new products and connect to the brand’s community. The Company leverages photos and videos from social network sites to help ~~Monotype reach new customers, with an opportunity~~ to ~~add value by including some of the world’s largest~~create powerful branded experiences that drive consumer engagement and ~~most popular collections of fonts. The impact of this acquisition was not material to our condensed consolidated financial statements.~~

increase conversions. The Company acquired ~~Swyft Media~~Olapic for an aggregate purchase price of approximately ~~$17.0~~$123.7 million, consisting of ~~$12.1~~approximately $13.7 million in cash ~~plus~~and borrowed $110.0 million from its line of credit, net of cash acquired. The Merger Agreement included an additional $9.0 million of consideration that has been placed in escrow and will be paid to the founders of Olapic contingent ~~consideration~~upon continued employment with the Company. Accordingly, this amount will be recognized as compensation expense over the service period contractually required to earn such amounts, which is $3.0 million after twenty four months and the remainder after thirty six months from the acquisition date. Monotype issued approximately $17.1 million of upa combination of restricted stock awards or restricted stock units to ~~$15.0 million payable through 2018, which had an~~the founders and employees of Olapic. These awards will vest over time based on continued employment, and accordingly will be accounted for as compensation expense. Seventy four employees from Olapic’s U.S. operations, eighty four employees from Olapic’s Argentina operations and forty UK and European employees joined the Company in connection with the acquisition. The results of operations of Olapic have been included in our consolidated results and revenue is included within the Creative Professional market beginning on August 9, 2016, the date of acquisition.

The table below provides the Olapic employees by functional area who have joined the Company in connection with the acquisition:

The purchase price was allocated to the assets and liabilities based upon their estimated ~~net present~~fair value ~~of $4.9 million~~ at the date of ~~acquisition. We paid $11.6 million from cash on hand at the time~~acquisition, as noted below (in thousands):

The estimated fair value of ~~the acquisition, net~~intangible assets acquired were recorded as follows:

A portion of ~~cash acquired. Of~~ the purchase price ~~approximately $4.7 million and $13.6 million have~~has been allocated to intangible assets and goodwill, ~~respectively.~~respectively, and is reflected in the tables above. The fair value of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed is less than the purchase price, resulting in the recognition of goodwill. The goodwill reflects the value of the synergies we expect to realize and the assembled workforce. The acquisition of ~~Swyft Media~~Olapic was structured in such a manner that the goodwill is not expected to be deductible for tax purposes. The purchase price has been allocated to the tangible and intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed based upon the respective estimates of fair value as of the date of the acquisition, which remains preliminary as of September 30, ~~2015,~~2016, and using assumptions that the Company’s management believes are reasonable given the information currently available. The final allocation of the purchase price to intangible assets, goodwill and deferred tax assets and liabilities may differ materially from the information presented in these condensed

consolidated financial statements. Twelve employees joined the Company in connection with the acquisition. See Note 6 for additional information on the fair value measurements for all financial assets and liabilities, including contingent consideration, which is measured at fair value on a recurring basis.

We ~~incur foreign currency exchange gains~~recorded revenue of $2.0 million and ~~losses related to certain customers that are invoiced in U.S. dollars, but who have~~a net loss of $4.6 million from Olapic, since the ~~option to make an equivalent payment in their own functional currencies at a specified exchange rate as of a specified date. In the period from that~~acquisition date, until payment in the customer’s functional currency is received and converted into U.S. dollars, we can incur realized gains and losses. We also incur foreign currency exchange gains and losses on certain intercompany assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies. We are currently utilizing 30-day forward contracts to mitigate our exposure on these currency fluctuations. These contracts are generally set to expire and are settled at month end. The instruments are not designated as hedging instruments, and accordingly, the gain or loss is recognized upon cash settlement andwhich is included in loss on derivatives in the accompanying condensed consolidated statements of income. At September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014 we had one forward foreign exchange contract outstanding which was entered into on those dates. See Note 6 for details regarding the fair value of these instruments.

~~The following table presents the losses and (gains) on~~ our ~~derivative financial instruments which are included in gain on derivatives in our accompanying~~ condensed consolidated statements of income, in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016. Transaction costs of $0.7 million and $1.1 million are included in general and administrative expenses in our condensed consolidated statements of income for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016, respectively.

The following table shows unaudited pro forma results of operations as if we had acquired Olapic at the beginning of the periods presented (in ~~thousands)~~thousands, except per share amounts):

6.The unaudited pro forma results of operations are not necessarily indicative of the actual results that would have occurred had the transactions actually taken place at the beginning of the periods indicated.

Fair value is ~~based on~~defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. In order to increase consistency and comparability in fair value measurements, the Codification ~~establishes~~established a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes observable and unobservable inputs used to measure fair value into three broad levels, which are described below:

Level 1: Quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets that are accessible at the measurement date for assets or liabilities. The fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority to Level 1 inputs.

Level 2: ~~Other~~Observable inputs ~~that are observable directly or indirectly,~~other than quoted prices included in Level 1, such as quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets; quoted prices for identical or similar assets and liabilities in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market ~~corroborated inputs.~~data.

Level 3: Unobservable inputs that are ~~used when~~supported by little or no market ~~data is available~~activity and ~~requires~~that are significant to the ~~Company to develop its own assumptions about how market participants would price~~fair value of the assets or liabilities. This includes certain pricing models, discounted cash flow methodologies and similar techniques that use significant unobservable inputs. The fair value hierarchy gives the lowest priority to Level 3 inputs.

In determining fair value, the Company utilizes valuation techniques that maximize the use of observable inputs and minimizes the use of unobservable inputs to the extent possible as well as considers counterparty and our own credit risk in its assessment of fair value.

The following table presents our financial assets and liabilities that are carried at fair value, classified according to the three categories described above (in thousands):


	Fair Value Measurement at September 30, 2015								Fair Value Measurement at September 30, 2016
	Total		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)		Total		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
Assets:
Cash equivalents—money market funds	$	20,626	$	20,626	$	—	$	—	$	30,722	$	30,722	$	—	$	—
Cash equivalents—U.S. government and agency securities		1,535		—		1,535		—
Cash equivalents—commercial paper		3,905		—		3,905		—		14,641		—		14,641		—
Cash equivalents—corporate bonds		13,971		—		13,971		—		4,782		—		4,782		—

Total assets	$	40,037	$	20,626	$	19,411	$	—	$	50,145	$	30,722	$	19,423	$	—

Liabilities:
Contingent acquisition consideration	$	5,055	$	—	$	—	$	5,055

Total liabilities	$	5,055	$	—	$	—	$	5,055


	Fair Value Measurement at December 31, 2014								Fair Value Measurement at December 31, 2015
	Total		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)		Total		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
Assets:
Cash equivalents—money market funds	$	34,309	$	34,309	$	—	$	—	$	21,808	$	21,808	$	—	$	—
Cash equivalents—commercial paper		3,000		—		3,000		—		8,920		—		8,920		—
Cash equivalents—U.S. government and agency securities		2,700		—		2,700		—
Cash equivalents—corporate bonds										9,293		—		9,293		—

Total assets	$	40,009	$	34,309	$	5,700	$	—	$	40,021	$	21,808	$	18,213	$	—

Liabilities:
Contingent acquisition consideration	$	270	$	—	$	270	$	—

Total liabilities	$	270	$	—	$	270	$	—

The Company’s recurring fair value measures relate to short-term investments, which are classified as cash equivalents, derivative instruments and from time-to-time contingent consideration. The fair value of our cash equivalents are either based on quoted prices for similar assets or other observable inputs such as yield curves at commonly quoted intervals and other market corroborated inputs. The fair value of our derivatives is based on quoted market prices from various banking institutions or an independent ~~third party~~third-party provider for similar instruments. In determining the fair value, we consider our non-performance risk and that of our counterparties. At September 30, ~~2015,~~2016, we had one 30-day forward contract to sell ~~2.3~~2.6 million British pound sterling and purchase $3.4 million that together, had an immaterial fair value. ~~At December 31, 2014, we had one 30-day~~There were no outstanding forward ~~contract outstanding to sell 2.3 million British pound sterling and purchase $3.5 million that together, had an immaterial fair value.~~

~~For the contingent acquisition consideration classified as Level 2~~contracts at December 31, ~~2014, fair value approximated book value, and represented the amount to be paid based on actual achievement of the criteria.~~2015.

At September 30, 2015, the Company had recorded approximately $5.1 million in contingent consideration related to the January 2015 acquisition of Swyft Media. The contingent consideration is payable in cash based on the achievement of certain revenue and EBITDA margin targets for the years ending December 31, 2015 through 2016, with a catch-up period for the year ending December 31, 2017, and subject to a cap of $15.0 million. The fair value of this liability was estimated using a Monte Carlo simulation model, relying on significant inputs that are not observable in the market and thus represent a Level 3 fair value measurement. The significant inputs in the Level 3 measurement not supported by market activity included our expected revenues and EBITDA for each of the measurement periods and the estimated level of risk and volatility around the forecast. The Monte Carlo

simulation was relied on to estimate the projected revenues, EBITDA margins, and contingent acquisition consideration payments for each measurement period. The average contingent acquisition consideration payments for the years 2015 through 2017, following 100,000 simulation trials, were discounted to present value to capture the time value of money and counterparty risk, based upon an assessment of the Company’s borrowing risk, and applying its credit rating to adjust the risk free rate.

~~The changes in the estimated fair value for our liabilities measured on a recurring basis using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) are as follows (in thousands):~~

The Company’s non-financial assets and non-financial liabilities subject to non-recurring measurements include goodwill and intangible assets.

The changes in the carrying value of ~~the following~~goodwill are as follows (in thousands):


	Weighted-	September 30, 2015							December 31, 2014							Weighted- Average Amortization Period (Years)				September 30, 2016												December 31, 2015
	Average Amortization Period (Years)	Gross Carrying Amount		Accumulated Amortization			Net Balance		Gross Carrying Amount		Accumulated Amortization			Net Balance					Gross Carrying Amount				Accumulated Amortization				Net Balance				Gross Carrying Amount				Accumulated Amortization				Net Balance
Customer relationships	10	$	60,167	$	(48,339	)	$	11,828	$	57,488	$	(47,018	)	$	10,470			10			$	67,844			$	(50,315	)		$	17,529			$	59,994			$	(48,767	)		$	11,227
Acquired technology	11		54,542		(38,118	)		16,424		55,064		(34,411	)		20,653		11				70,938				(43,355	)			27,583				54,424				(39,336	)			15,088
Non-compete agreements	4		12,981		(12,050	)		931		12,172		(11,862	)		310		4				14,625				(12,575	)			2,050				12,946				(12,111	)			835
Indefinite-lived intangible assets:
Trademarks			38,028		—			38,028		38,029		—			38,029						44,892				—				44,892				37,714				—				37,714
Domain names			4,400		—			4,400		4,400		—			4,400						4,400				—				4,400				4,400				—				4,400

Total		$	170,118	$	(98,507	)	$	71,611	$	167,153	$	(93,291	)	$	73,862					$	202,699			$	(106,245	)		$	96,454			$	169,478			$	(100,214	)		$	69,264

On September 15, 2015, the Company entered into a new credit agreement (the “New Credit Agreement”) by and among the Company, the Company’s subsidiary, Monotype Imaging Inc., any financial institution that becomes a Lender (as defined therein) and Silicon Valley Bank, (“~~SVB”),~~ as agent which provides for a five-year $150.0 million secured revolving credit facility (the “Credit Facility”).

The Credit Facility permits the Company to request that the Lenders, at their election, increase the secured credit facility to a maximum of $200.0 million. The Credit Facility is available to the Company on a revolving basis through September 15, 2020. Repayment of any amounts borrowed are not required until maturity of the Credit Facility. However, the Company may repay any amounts borrowed at any time, without premium or penalty. The New Credit Agreement replaced the Company’s existing $120.0 million revolving credit facility (the “Original Credit Agreement”) by and between the Company and Wells Fargo Capital Finance, LLC. The Original Credit Agreement was terminated effective September 15, 2015 and was scheduled to expire on July 13, 2016. At September 30, 2016, the Company had $110.0 million outstanding under the Credit Facility.

Borrowings under the Credit Facility bear interest ~~through September 15, 2020~~ at a variable rate not less than zero based upon, at the Company’s option, either LIBOR or the higher of (i) the prime rate as published in the Wall Street Journal, and (ii) 0.5% plus the overnight federal funds rate, plus in each case, an applicable margin. The applicable margin for LIBOR loans, based on the applicable leverage ratio, is 1.25%, 1.50% or 1.75% per annum, and the applicable margin for base rate loans, based on the applicable leverage ratio, is either 0.25%, 0.50% or 0.75%% per annum. At September 30, ~~2015~~2016 our rate, inclusive of applicable margins, was ~~1.4%~~1.8% for LIBOR. ~~At September 30, 2015, the Company had no outstanding borrowings under the Credit Facility.~~ The Company is required to pay a commitment fee, based on the applicable leverage ratio, equal to 0.20%, 0.25% or 0.30% per annum on the undrawn portion available under the revolving credit facility and variable per annum fees in respect of outstanding letters of credit. In connection with the New Credit Agreement, the Company incurred closing and legal fees of ~~approximately $0.8~~$1.0 million, which have been accounted for as deferred financing costs and will be amortized to interest expense over the term of the New Credit Agreement. In addition, $0.1 million of unamortized deferred financing costs associated with the pro-rata share of prior loan syndicate lenders that did not participate in the new facility were written off and charged to other expense in the third quarter of 2015.

In addition to other covenants, the New Credit Agreement places limits on the Company and its subsidiaries’ ability to incur debt or liens and engage in sale-leaseback transactions, make loans and investments, incur additional indebtedness, engage in mergers, acquisitions and asset sales, transact with affiliates and alter its business. The New Credit Agreement also contains events of default, and affirmative covenants, including financial maintenance covenants which include (i) a maximum ratio of consolidated total debt to consolidated adjusted EBITDA of 3.00 to 1.00, and (ii) a minimum consolidated fixed charge coverage ratio of 1.25 to 1.00. At September 30, 2016, our leverage ratio was 1.69:1.00 and our fixed charge ratio was 4.19:1.00. Adjusted EBITDA, under the Credit Facility, is defined as consolidated net income (or loss), plus net interest expense, income taxes, depreciation and amortization, and share based compensation expense, plus acquisition expenses not to exceed $2.0 million on a trailing twelve month basis, plus restructuring, issuance costs, cash non-operating costs and other expenses or losses minus cash non-operating gains and other non-cash gains. Failure to comply with these covenants, or the occurrence of an event of default, could permit the Lenders under the New Credit Agreement to declare all amounts borrowed under the New Credit Agreement, together with accrued interest and fees, to be immediately due and payable. In addition, the Credit Facility is secured by a lien on substantially all of the Company’s and its domestic subsidiaries’ tangible and intangible property by a pledge of all of the equity interests of the Company’s direct and indirect domestic subsidiaries and by a pledge by the Company’s domestic subsidiaries of 65% of the equity of their direct foreign subsidiaries, subject to limited exceptions. The Company was in compliance with all covenants under our Credit Facility as of September 30, ~~2015.~~2016.

Our German subsidiary maintains an unfunded defined benefit pension plan which covers substantially all employees who joined the company prior to the plan’s closure to new participants in 2006. Participants are entitled to benefits in the form of retirement, disability and surviving dependent pensions. Benefits generally depend on years of service and the salary of the employees.

The components of net periodic benefit cost included in the accompanying condensed consolidated statements of income were as follows (in thousands):


	Three Months Ended September 30,				Nine Months Ended September 30,				Three Months Ended September 30,				Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2015		2014		2015		2014		2016		2015		2016		2015
Service cost	$	30	$	27	$	89	$	86	$	23	$	30	$	71	$	89
Interest cost		29		41		87		129		31		29		91		87
Amortization		20		1		58		1		13		20		38		58

Net periodic benefit cost	$	79	$	69	$	234	$	216	$	67	$	79	$	200	$	234

A reconciliation of income taxes computed at federal statutory rates to income tax expense is as follows (dollar amounts in thousands):


	Three Months Ended September 30,										Three Months Ended September 30,
	2015					2014					2016					2015
Provision for income taxes at statutory rate	$	3,855		35.0	%	$	3,899		35.0	%	$	1,796		35.0	%	$	3,855		35.0	%
State and local income taxes, net of federal tax benefit		132		1.2	%		205		1.8	%		559		10.9	%		132		1.2	%
Stock compensation		39		0.4	%		78		0.7	%		86		1.7	%		39		0.4	%
Foreign rate differential		(76	)	(0.7	)%		448		4.0	%		(255	)	(4.9	)%		(76	)	(0.7	)%
Reversal of reserve for income taxes		(689	)	(6.3	)%		(131	)	(1.2	)%		—		—			(689	)	(6.3	)%
Research credits												(141	)	(2.8	)%		—		—
Permanent non-deductible acquisition related expense												905		17.6	%		—		—
Disqualifying dispositions on incentive stock options		(6	)	(0.1	)%		(62	)	(0.6	)%		(33	)	(0.6	)%		(6	)	(0.1	)%
Other, net		(280	)	(2.5	)%		(335	)	(2.9	)%		(210	)	(4.2	)%		(280	)	(2.5	)%

Reported income tax provision	$	2,975		27.0	%	$	4,102		36.8	%	$	2,707		52.7	%	$	2,975		27.0	%


	Nine Months Ended September 30,										Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2015					2014					2016					2015
Provision for income taxes at statutory rate	$	10,856		35.0	%	$	12,927		35.0	%	$	8,437		35.0	%	$	10,856		35.0	%
State and local income taxes, net of federal tax benefit		419		1.3	%		686		1.9	%		830		3.4	%		419		1.3	%
Stock compensation		101		0.3	%		243		0.7	%		181		0.8	%		101		0.3	%
Foreign rate differential		(262	)	(0.8	)%		626		1.7	%		(512	)	(2.1	)%		(262	)	(0.8	)%
Reversal of reserve for income taxes		(1,031	)	(3.3	)%		(131	)	(0.4	)%		—		—			(1,031	)	(3.3	)%
Research credits												(300	)	(1.2	)%		—		—
Permanent non-deductible acquisition related expense												1,324		5.5	%		—		—
Disqualifying dispositions on incentive stock options		(25	)	(0.1	)%		(104	)	(0.3	)%		(44	)	(0.2	)%		(25	)	(0.1	)%
Other, net		(341	)	(1.1	)%		(488	)	(1.4	)%		(245	)	(1.1	)%		(341	)	(1.1	)%

Reported income tax provision	$	9,717		31.3	%	$	13,759		37.2	%	$	9,671		40.1	%	$	9,717		31.3	%

At September 30, ~~2015,~~2016, the reserve for uncertain tax positions was approximately $6.0 million. Of this amount, ~~$2.7~~$3.6 million is recorded as a reduction of deferred tax assets and ~~$3.3~~$2.4 million is classified as long term liabilities.

The permanent non-deductible acquisition related expense consists of purchase consideration primarily from the Olapic and Swyft acquisitions that is contingent on continued employment of key employees. For financial reporting purposes, these amounts are treated as compensation expense recognized ratably over the minimum required employment periods, which range from January 2018 to August 2019. Since these transactions were accounted for as stock acquisitions, such amounts are not deductible for tax purposes. During the first quarter of 2015, the Company settled a tax audit related to its Japan subsidiary. As a result of this settlement, the Company recognized a tax benefit of $0.3 million. During the third quarter of 2015, the Company settled a tax audit related to its 2012 U.S. federal tax return. As a result of this settlement, the Company recognized a tax benefit of $0.2 million. Additionally, the Company recognized a tax benefit of $0.5 million in the quarter ended September 30, 2015, as a result of the expiration of the 2011 U.S. federal statute of limitations. The effect of foreign income and dividends resulted in a tax benefit of $0.1 million in the quarter ended September 2015, as compared to $0.4 million expense in the same period in 2014, due to changes in the profitability of the Company’s UK subsidiary, to an income position in 2015 from a loss position in 2014.

Basic and diluted earnings per share are computed pursuant to the two-class method. The two-class method determines earnings per share for each class of common stock and participating security according to their respective participation rights in undistributed earnings. Unvested restricted stock awards granted to employees are considered participating securities as they receive non-forfeitable rights to cash dividends at the same rate as common stock. In accordance with ASC Topic No. 260,Earnings Per Share,diluted net income per share is calculated using the more dilutive of the following two approaches:

For ~~the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015,~~all periods presented, the two-class ~~method was used in the computation of diluted net income per share as this approach was more dilutive. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014, the treasury stock~~ method was used in the computation of diluted net income per share as this approach was more dilutive. The following presents a reconciliation of the numerator and denominator used in the calculation of basic and diluted net income per share (in thousands, except share and per share data):


	Three Months Ended September 30,						Nine Months Ended September 30,						Three Months Ended September 30,						Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2015			2014			2015			2014			2016			2015			2016			2015
Numerator:
Net income, as reported	$	8,039		$	7,039		$	21,300		$	23,175		$	2,425		$	8,039		$	14,436		$	21,300
Less: net income attributable to participating securities		(202	)		(140	)		(501	)		(430	)		(84	)		(202	)		(454	)		(501	)

Net income available to common shareholders—basic	$	7,837		$	6,899		$	20,799		$	22,745		$	2,341		$	7,837		$	13,982		$	20,799

Denominator:
Basic:
Weighted-average shares of common stock outstanding		39,797,638			39,222,580			39,771,986			39,290,673			41,687,590			39,797,638			40,730,524			39,771,986
Less: weighted-average shares of unvested restricted common stock outstanding		(1,027,012	)		(791,549	)		(963,540	)		(747,272	)		(1,710,470	)		(1,027,012	)		(1,382,087	)		(963,540	)

Weighted-average number of common shares used in computing basic net income per common share		38,770,626			38,431,031			38,808,446			38,543,401			39,977,120			38,770,626			39,348,437			38,808,446

Net income per share applicable to common shareholders—basic	$	0.20		$	0.18		$	0.54		$	0.59		$	0.06		$	0.20		$	0.36		$	0.54


	Three Months Ended September 30,						Nine Months Ended September 30,						Three Months Ended September 30,						Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2015			2014			2015			2014			2016			2015			2016			2015
Numerator:
Net income available to common shareholders—basic	$	7,837		$	6,899		$	20,799		$	22,745		$	2,341		$	7,837		$	13,982		$	20,799
Add-back: undistributed earnings allocated to unvested shareholders⁽¹⁾		105			N/A			227			N/A			(88	)		105			33			227
Less: undistributed earnings reallocated to unvested shareholders⁽¹⁾		(104	)		N/A			(224	)		N/A			87			(104	)		(32	)		(224	)

Net income available to common shareholders—diluted	$	7,838		$	6,899		$	20,802		$	22,745		$	2,340		$	7,838		$	13,983		$	20,802

Denominator:
Diluted:
Weighted-average shares of common stock outstanding														41,687,590			39,797,638			40,730,524			39,771,986
Less: weighted-average shares of unvested restricted common stock outstanding														(1,710,470	)		(1,027,012	)		(1,382,087	)		(963,540	)
Weighted-average number of common shares issuable upon exercise of outstanding stock options, based on the treasury stock method														284,127			460,157			351,353			574,112

Weighted-average number of common shares used in computing diluted net income per common share														40,261,247			39,230,783			39,699,790			39,382,558

Net income per share applicable to common shareholders—diluted													$	0.06		$	0.20		$	0.35		$	0.53

Three Months Ended
September 30, Nine Months Ended
September 30,
2015 2014 2015 2014
Denominator:

Diluted:

Weighted-average shares of common stock outstanding
39,797,638    39,222,580    39,771,986    39,290,673
Less: weighted-average shares of unvested restricted common stock outstanding
(1,027,012 ) (791,549 ) (963,540 ) (747,272 )
Weighted-average number of common shares issuable upon exercise of outstanding stock options, based on the treasury stock method
460,157    893,081    574,112    946,674
Weighted-average number of restricted stock outstanding, based on the treasury stock method⁽²⁾
N/A    163,190    N/A    173,732

Weighted-average number of common shares used in computing diluted net income per common share
39,230,783    39,487,302    39,382,558    39,663,807

Net income per share applicable to common shareholders—diluted
$ 0.20    $ 0.17    $ 0.53    $ 0.57

The following common share equivalents have been excluded from the computation of diluted weighted-average shares outstanding, as their effect would have been anti-dilutive:

On ~~October 23, 2013,~~August 30, 2016, the Company’s Board of Directors approved a share ~~repurchase~~purchase program permitting repurchases of up to ~~$50.0~~$25.0 million of the Company’s outstanding shares of common ~~shares for a maximum period~~stock through December 31, 2017. During the third quarter of ~~two years.~~2016, there were no purchases of common stock under the program. Intended to offset shareholder dilution, the Company ~~made~~expects to make repurchases periodically, either on the open market or in privately negotiated transactions, subject to availability, as business and market conditions ~~warranted, through June 5, 2015, at which date the maximum amount of repurchases was reached. During the nine months ended September 30, 2015,~~warrant. The share repurchase program does not obligate the Company ~~repurchased a total of 657,028 shares of its common stock for an aggregate purchase price of $18.5 million, including brokers’ fees. Of that~~to acquire any particular amount ~~the Company purchased 14,278 shares~~ of common stock, ~~for an aggregate purchase price~~and the program may be suspended or discontinued at management’s and/or the Board of ~~$0.4 million, including brokers’ fees, in excess of its publicly announced share repurchase program upon the conclusion of the program.~~Director’s discretion.

We account for share based compensation in accordance with ASC Topic No. 718,Compensation—Stock Compensation, which requires the measurement of compensation costs at fair value on the date of grant and recognition of compensation expense over the service period for awards expected to vest. The following presents the impact of share based compensation expense on our condensed consolidated statements of income (in thousands):


	Three Months Ended September 30,				Nine Months Ended September 30,				Three Months Ended September 30,				Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2015		2014		2015		2014		2016		2015		2016		2015
Marketing and selling	$	1,693	$	1,257	$	4,568	$	3,553	$	2,164	$	1,693	$	5,349	$	4,568
Research and development		633		620		1,819		1,747		1,180		633		2,869		1,819
General and administrative		1,274		942		3,454		2,535		1,962		1,274		4,487		3,454

Total expensed	$	3,600	$	2,819	$	9,841	$	7,835	$	5,306	$	3,600	$	12,705	$	9,841
Property and equipment		—		39		82		102		—		—		—		82

Total share based compensation	$	3,600	$	2,858	$	9,923	$	7,937	$	5,306	$	3,600	$	12,705	$	9,923

In the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015, approximately $0 and $82 ~~thousand, respectively, and in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014, approximately $39 thousand and $102~~ thousand, respectively, of share based compensation was capitalized as part of an internal software project, and this amount is included in property and equipment, net in our condensed consolidated balance sheet.

As of September 30, ~~2015,~~2016, the Company had ~~$29.7~~$42.3 million of unrecognized compensation expense, which is net of expected forfeitures, related to employees and directors’ unvested stock options, restricted stock units and restricted stock awards that are expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of ~~2.8~~2.9 years. As of September 30, 2016, most of the performance criteria was not met on the performance-based restricted stock units; however, if the Company had determined achievement of those performance criteria was probable, the Company would have $5.5 million of unrecognized compensation expense related to these awards.

We view our operations and manage our business as one segment: the development, marketing and licensing of technologies and fonts. Factors used to identify our single segment include the financial information available for evaluation by our chief operating decision maker in making decisions about how to allocate resources and assess performance. While our technologies and services are sold into two principal markets, Creative Professional and OEM, expenses and assets are not formally allocated to these market segments, and operating results are assessed on an aggregate basis to make decisions about the allocation of resources. Olapic’s revenue has been included in our Creative Professional market. The following table presents revenue for these two major markets (in thousands):


	Three Months Ended September 30,				Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2016		2015		2016		2015
Creative Professional	$	27,798	$	22,472	$	75,170	$	63,654
OEM		24,431		26,880		75,634		78,149

Total	$	52,229	$	49,352	$	150,804	$	141,803

The Company attributes ~~revenues~~revenue to geographic areas based on the location of our subsidiary receiving such revenue. For example, licenses may be sold to large international companies which may be headquartered in ~~South~~the Republic of Korea, but the sales are received and recorded by our subsidiary located in the United States. In this example, the revenue would be reflected in the United States totals in the table below. We market our products and services through offices in the U.S., United Kingdom, Germany, ~~Hong Kong, South~~China, Republic of Korea and Japan. The following summarizes revenue by location:


	Three Months Ended September 30,										Three Months Ended September 30,
	2015					2014					2016					2015
	Sales		% of Total			Sales		% of Total			Sales		% of Total			Sales		% of Total
	(In thousands, except percentages)										(In thousands, except percentages)
United States	$	27,154		55.0	%	$	25,041		53.2	%	$	32,230		61.7	%	$	27,154		55.0	%
United Kingdom		4,029		8.2			2,248		4.8			2,105		4.0			4,029		8.2
Germany		5,877		11.9			7,131		15.2			6,139		11.8			5,877		11.9
Japan		12,235		24.8			12,449		26.4			11,625		22.3			12,235		24.8
Other Asia		57		0.1			194		0.4			130		0.2			57		0.1

Total	$	49,352		100.0	%	$	47,063		100.0	%	$	52,229		100.0	%	$	49,352		100.0	%


	Nine Months Ended September 30,										Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2015					2014					2016					2015
	Sales		% of Total			Sales		% of Total			Sales		% of Total			Sales		% of Total
	(In thousands, except percentages)										(In thousands, except percentages)
United States	$	78,517		55.4	%	$	73,579		53.3	%	$	85,991		57.0	%	$	78,517		55.4	%
United Kingdom		7,407		5.2			7,577		5.5			8,677		5.8			7,407		5.2
Germany		17,110		12.1			15,818		11.5			18,706		12.4			17,110		12.1
Japan		38,215		26.9			40,530		29.3			36,973		24.5			38,215		26.9
Other Asia		554		0.4			594		0.4			457		0.3			554		0.4

Total	$	141,803		100.0	%	$	138,098		100.0	%	$	150,804		100.0	%	$	141,803		100.0	%

Long-lived assets, which include property and equipment, goodwill and ~~intangibles~~intangible assets, but exclude other assets ~~long-term investments~~ and deferred tax assets, are attributed to geographic areas in which Company assets reside and is shown below (in thousands):


	September 30, 2015		December 31, 2014		September 30, 2016		December 31, 2015
Long-lived assets:
United States	$	208,580	$	189,927	$	323,142	$	206,822
United Kingdom		4,736		5,138		4,004		4,581
Germany		57,262		62,917		55,571		55,269
Asia (including Japan)		3,474		3,457
Other						3,422		3,531

Total	$	274,052	$	261,439	$	386,139	$	270,203

We conduct operations in facilities under operating leases expiring through 2025. In accordance with the lease terms, we pay real estate taxes and other operating costs. Our leases in California, New York, Massachusetts, Germany, India and Republic of Korea contain renewal options. The Company’s future minimum payments under non-cancelable operating leases as of September 30, 2016 are approximately as follows (in thousands):

From time to time, we may be a party to various claims, suits and complaints. We do not believe that there are claims or legal proceedings that, if determined adversely to us, would have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations or financial condition.

Under our standard license agreement with our OEM customers, we warrant that the licensed technologies are free of infringement claims of intellectual property rights and will meet the specifications as defined in the licensing agreement for a specified period, typically one year. Under the licensing agreements, liability for such indemnity obligations is limited, generally to the total arrangement fee; however, exceptions have been made on a case-by-case basis, increasing the maximum potential liability to agreed upon amounts at the time the contract is entered into or unlimited liability. We believe the estimated fair value of these warranties is minimal. Accordingly, there are no liabilities recorded for these warranties as of September 30, ~~2015~~2016 and December 31, ~~2014.~~2015.

On October 26, ~~2015~~2016 the Company’s Board of Directors declared a ~~$0.10~~$0.11 per share quarterly cash dividend on our outstanding common stock. The record date is set for January ~~4, 2016~~2, 2017 and the dividend is payable to shareholders of record on January ~~22, 2016.~~20, 2017. Dividends are declared at the discretion of the Company’s Board of Directors and depend on actual cash from operations, the Company’s financial condition and capital requirements and any other factors the Company’s Board of Directors may consider relevant. Future dividend declarations, as well as the record and payment dates for such dividends, will be determined by the Company’s Board of Directors on a quarterly basis.

Subsequent to September 30, 2016, the Company purchased 8,000 shares of common stock for $0.2 million, at an average price per share of $21.84 through October 20, 2016. The Company purchased these shares on the open market at prevailing market prices and in accordance with its previously announced share purchase program. At October 20, 2016, $24.8 million remains for future purchase under the Plan.

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains forward looking statements. Forward looking statements relate to future events or our future financial performance. We generally identify forward looking statements by terminology such as “may,” “will,” “should,” “expects,” “plans,” “anticipates,” “could,” “intends,” “target,” “projects,” “contemplates,” “believes,” “estimates,” “predicts,” “potential” or “continue” or the negative of these terms or other similar words. These statements are only predictions. We have based these forward looking statements largely on our current expectations and projections about future events and financial trends that we believe may affect our business, results of operations and financial condition. The outcome of the events described in these forward looking statements is subject to risks, uncertainties and other factors described in “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” “Risk Factors” and elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. Accordingly, you should not rely upon forward looking statements as predictions of future events. We cannot assure you that the events and circumstances reflected in the forward looking statements will be achieved or occur, and actual results could differ materially from those projected in the forward looking statements. The forward looking statements made in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q relate only to events as of the date on which the statements are made. We undertake no obligation to update any forward looking statement to reflect events or circumstances after the date on which the statement is made or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events.

We are a leading provider of type, technology and expertise for creative ~~applications~~professionals and consumer ~~devices.~~device manufacturers. Our vision is that our fonts and technology empower every word and experience. ~~We strive to enable the best user experience and ensure brand integrity, regardless of device, platform or language.~~ We help creative professionals, consumer device manufacturers and independent software vendors connect their brands, content, products and services to consumers and businesses ~~everywhere, from content creation to consumption.~~everywhere. Monotype is home to some of the world’s ~~best known~~most well-known typeface collections. Along with our custom type services, our solutions enable ~~customers~~consumers and professionals to express their creativity, while our tools and technologies improve creative workflows and maximize efficiency as content is published or distributed. Our solutions provide worldwide language coverage and high-quality text, and our embedded solutions support compelling user ~~interfaces and brand fidelity by providing for the display of content on any device or platform, as the author intended.~~interfaces. We offer more than ~~25,000~~16,000 typeface designs, and include some of the world’s most widely used designs, such as the Times New Roman^®, Helvetica^®, Frutiger^®, ITC Franklin Gothic™, FF Meta^® and Droid™ typefaces, and support more than 250 Latin and non-Latin languages. Our e-commerce websites, includingmyfonts.com, fonts.com, fontshop.com, ~~linotype.com~~and ~~fontfont.com,~~linotype.com, which attracted more than 7780 million visits in ~~2014~~2015 from over 200 countries and territories, offer thousands of high-quality font products ~~in some cases more than 127,000,~~ including our own fonts from the Monotype Libraries, as well as fonts from third parties.

On August 9, 2016, the Company purchased all of the outstanding shares of Olapic, Inc., a privately-held company located in located in New York, New York; its wholly-owned subsidiaries Olapic UK Ltd., based in London, England; and Olapic Argentina S.A., based in Córdoba, Argentina. Olapic is a provider of a leading visual commerce platform for collecting, curating, showcasing and measuring crowd sourced photos and videos. Olapic’s Earned Content Platform helps brands collect, curate, use and analyze user-generated content in the form of images and videos in their ecommerce experiences and across multiple marketing channels. This allows consumers to make more educated purchasing decisions, discover new products and connect to the brand’s community. The Company leverages photos and videos from social network sites to help to create powerful branded experiences that drive consumer engagement and increase conversions. The Company acquired Olapic for an aggregate purchase price of approximately $123.7 million, consisting of approximately $13.7 million in cash and borrowed $110.0 million from its line of credit, net of cash acquired. The merger agreement included an additional $9.0 million of consideration that has been placed in escrow and will be paid to the founders of Olapic contingent upon continued employment with the Company. Accordingly, this amount will be recognized as compensation expense over the service period contractually required to earn such amounts, which is $3.0 million after twenty four months and the remainder after thirty six months from the acquisition date. Monotype issued approximately $17.1 million of a combination of restricted stock awards or restricted stock units to the founders and employees of Olapic. These awards will vest over time based on continued employment, and accordingly will be accounted for as compensation expense. Seventy five employees from Olapic’s U.S. operations, eighty five employees from Olapic’s Argentina operations and forty one UK and European employees joined the Company in connection with the acquisition. The results of operations of Olapic have been included in our consolidated results and revenue is included within the Creative Professional market beginning on August 9, 2016, the date of acquisition. In connection with the acquisition, we recorded $88.7 million of goodwill. The goodwill reflects the value of the synergies we expect to realize and the assembled workforce. The acquisition of Olapic was structured in such a manner that the goodwill is not expected to be deductible for tax purposes. The purchase price has been allocated to the tangible and intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed based upon the respective estimates of fair value as of the date of the acquisition, which remains preliminary as of September 30, 2016, and using assumptions that the Company’s management believes are reasonable given the information currently available. The final allocation of the purchase price to intangible assets, goodwill and deferred tax assets and liabilities may differ materially from the information presented in these condensed consolidated financial statements.

We derive revenue from two principal sources: primarily licensing our fonts and font related services to creative and business professionals, which we refer to as our Creative Professional revenue, and licensing our text imaging solutions to consumer device manufacturers and independent software vendors, which we refer to as our OEM revenue. We derive our Creative Professional revenue primarily from brands, agencies, publishers, corporations, enterprises, small businesses and individuals. Some of our revenue streams, particularly custom font design ~~service revenue~~services where spending is largely discretionary in nature, have historically been and we expect them to continue to be in the future, susceptible to weakening economic conditions.

Geographic revenue, which is based on the location of our subsidiary receiving such revenue, is in the table below:


	Three Months Ended September 30,										Three Months Ended September 30,
	2015					2014					2016					2015
	Sales		% of Total			Sales		% of Total			Sales		% of Total			Sales		% of Total
	(In thousands, except percentages)										(In thousands, except percentages)
United States	$	27,154		55.0	%	$	25,041		53.2	%	$	32,230		61.7	%	$	27,154		55.0	%
United Kingdom		4,029		8.2			2,248		4.8			2,105		4.0			4,029		8.2
Germany		5,877		11.9			7,131		15.2			6,139		11.8			5,877		11.9
Japan		12,235		24.8			12,449		26.4			11,625		22.3			12,235		24.8
Other Asia		57		0.1			194		0.4			130		0.2			57		0.1

Total	$	49,352		100.0	%	$	47,063		100.0	%	$	52,229		100.0	%	$	49,352		100.0	%


	Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2015					2014
	Sales		% of Total			Sales		% of Total
	(In thousands, except percentages)
United States	$	78,517		55.4	%	$	73,579		53.3	%
United Kingdom		7,407		5.2			7,577		5.5
Germany		17,110		12.1			15,818		11.5
Japan		38,215		26.9			40,530		29.3
Other Asia		554		0.4			594		0.4

Total	$	141,803		100.0	%	$	138,098		100.0	%

For the three months ended September 30, ~~2015~~2016 and ~~2014,~~2015, sales by our subsidiaries located outside the United States comprised ~~45.0%~~38.3% and ~~46.8%~~45.0%, respectively, of our total revenue. For the nine months ended September 30, ~~2015~~2016 and ~~2014,~~2015, sales by our subsidiaries located outside the United States comprised ~~44.6%~~43.0% and ~~46.7%~~44.6%, respectively, of our total revenue. In the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016, U.S. revenue as a percent of total revenue increased due to the Olapic acquisition. We expect that sales by our international subsidiaries will continue to represent a substantial portion of our revenue for the foreseeable future. Future international revenue will depend on the continued use and expansion of our fonts and font technology worldwide.

We derive a significant portion of our OEM revenue from a limited number of customers, in particular manufacturers of laser printers and consumer electronics. For the three months ended September 30, ~~2015~~2016 and ~~2014,~~2015, our top ten licensees by revenue, most of which are OEM customers, accounted for approximately ~~34.5%~~33.5% and ~~35.5%~~34.5% of our total revenue, respectively. For the nine months ended September 30, ~~2015~~2016 and ~~2014,~~2015, our top ten licensees by revenue, most of which are OEM customers, accounted for approximately ~~34.4%~~30.9% and ~~36.3%~~34.4% of our total revenue, respectively. Although no one customer accounted for more than 10% of our total revenue for the three or nine months ended September 30, ~~2015~~2016 or ~~2014,~~2015, if we are unable to maintain relationships with major customers or establish relationships with new customers, our licensing revenue will be adversely affected.

Our Creative Professional revenue is derived primarily from font licenses, font related services and from custom font design services. We license fonts directly to end-users through our e-commerce websites, via telephone, ~~email~~e-mail and indirectly through third-party resellers. Font related services refer to our web font services and web design tools. We also license fonts and provide custom font design services to graphic designers, advertising agencies, media organizations and corporations. Through our recent acquisition, we also license access to Olapic’s Earned Content Platform, application software, to brands. We refer to direct, indirect and custom ~~revenue,~~font design services, as non-web revenue, and refer to revenue that is derived from our websites, as web revenue.

Revenue from font licenses to our e-commerce customers is recognized upon payment by the customer and ~~when~~ the software embodying the font is shipped or made available. Revenue from font licenses to other customers is recognized upon shipment of the software embodying the font and when all other revenue recognition criteria have been met. Revenue from resellers is recognized upon notification from the reseller that our font product has been licensed and when all other revenue recognition criteria have been met. Custom font design services ~~revenue is~~are generally recognized upon delivery, unless it is part of a bundled services arrangement, in which case, it is recognized over the longest service period. Font related service revenue is mainly subscription based and it may

contain software as a service. ~~The subscription~~Substantially all of Olapic’s revenue consists of subscription-based software as a service (“SaaS”). Subscription revenue is recognized ratably over the subscription period.

We consider web server and commercial rights to online fonts as recurring revenue and it is recognized upon ~~invoicing~~payment by the customer and proof of font delivery, when all other revenue recognition criteria have been met. Contract accounting, completed contract for short-term projects and percentage-of-completion for long-term projects, is used where services are deemed essential to the software. We consider both the completed contract and percentage-of-completion method of revenue recognition for contract accounting arrangements. We have the ability to make reasonable estimates, and therefore, typically use the percentage-of-completion method in arrangements subject to contract accounting applying input or output measures, where appropriate. We make certain judgments by estimating the amount of expenses to be recognized, together with the percent of revenue earned in each particular period.

Our OEM revenue is derived substantially from per-unit royalties received for printer imaging and printer driver, or printer products, and display imaging products. Under our licensing arrangements we typically receive a royalty for each product unit incorporating our ~~text imaging solutions~~fonts and technology that is shipped by our OEM customers. We also receive OEM revenue from fixed fee licenses with certain of our OEM customers. Fixed fee licensing arrangements are not based on units shipped by the customer, ~~ships,~~ but instead, customers pay us on a periodic basis for the right to embed our ~~typefaces~~fonts and ~~technology.~~technology in their products. Although significantly less than royalties from per-unit shipments and fixed fees from OEM customers, we also receive revenue from software application and operating systems vendors, who include our ~~typefaces~~fonts and technology in their products, and for font development. Many of our per-unit royalty licenses continue for the duration that our OEM customers ship products that include our technology, unless terminated for breach. Other licenses have terms that typically range from one to five years, and usually provide for automatic or optional renewals. We recognize revenue from per-unit royalties in the period during which we receive a royalty report from a customer, typically one quarter after royalty-bearing units are shipped, as we do not have the ability to estimate the number of units shipped by our customers. Revenue from fixed fee licenses is generally recognized when it is billed to the customer, so long as the product has been delivered, the license fee is fixed and non-refundable and collection is probable. OEM revenue also includes project-related agreements for which contract accounting, completed contract for short-term projects and percentage-of-completion for long-term projects, may be used.

Our cost of revenue consists of font license fees that we pay on certain fonts that are owned by third parties, allocated internal engineering expense and overhead costs directly related to custom font design services. Our cost of revenue also consists of server and hosting fees and moderating fees related to delivery of Olapic’s SaaS services. License fees that we pay to third parties are typically based on a percentage of our Creative Professional and OEM revenue and do not involve minimum fees. Our cost of OEM revenue ishas typically had a lower cost than our cost of Creative Professional revenue because we own a higher percentage of the fonts licensed to our OEM customers, provide value-added technology and have negotiated lower royalty rates on the fonts we license from third parties because of volume. ~~The cost~~We have achieved improved margins on our Creative Professional revenue as a result of ~~our~~product mix and lower royalty rates. In addition, Creative Professional revenue includes custom font design service revenue, iswhich has a substantially higher cost than our other revenue. Our gross profit margin may vary depending on the ~~cost~~mix of revenue between sales of our ~~other revenue~~fonts and ~~as a result, our gross margin varies from period-to-period~~sales of third party fonts, and depending on the level of custom font design service ~~revenue recorded.~~revenue.

Cost of revenue also includes amortization of acquired technology, which we amortize over 8 to 15 years. For purposes of amortizing acquired technology we estimate the remaining useful life of the technology based upon various considerations, including our knowledge of the technology and the way our customers use it. We use the straight-line method to amortize our acquired ~~technology as there~~technology. There is no reliable evidence to suggest that we should expect any other pattern of amortization than an even pattern, and we believe this best reflects the expected pattern of economic usage.

Our gross profit percentage is influenced by a number of factors including product mix, pricing and volume at any particular time. However, our cost of OEM revenue is typically lower than our cost of Creative Professional revenue because we own a higher percentage of the fonts licensed to our OEM customers, provide value-added technology and have negotiated lower royalty rates on the fonts we license from third parties because of volume. ~~Within~~In addition, within our Creative Professional business, the cost of our custom font design service revenue is substantially higher than the cost of our other revenue. ~~As a result,~~The relative cost of our Creative Professional revenue has decreased in recent periods, as efforts to sell more of our fonts have been successful, and because we have recently experienced success in our effort to sell certain license rights that carry lower royalty rates to Creative Professional customers. Our gross profit ~~varies~~is subject to variability from period-to-period, depending on the product mix ~~between,~~ and ~~within, Creative Professional and OEM~~the level of custom font design service revenue.

The preparation of financial statements and related disclosures in conformity with GAAP and our discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations requires us to make judgments, assumptions and estimates that affect the amounts

reported in our consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that we believe are reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities. Actual results may differ from these estimates.

There has been no material change in our critical accounting policies since December 31, ~~2014.~~2015. Information about our critical accounting policies may be found in Part II, Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” under the heading “Critical Accounting Policies,” of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, ~~2014.~~2015.

Results of Operations for the Three Months Ended September 30, ~~2015~~2016 Compared to Three Months Ended September 30, ~~2014~~2015

The following table sets forth items in the condensed consolidated quarterly ~~statement~~statements of income as a percentage of sales for the periods indicated:


	Three Months Ended September 30,						Three Months Ended September 30,
	2015			2014			2016			2015
Revenue:
Creative Professional		45.5	%		42.7	%		53.2	%		45.5	%
OEM		54.5			57.3			46.8			54.5

Total revenue		100.0			100.0			100.0			100.0
Cost of revenue		14.9			15.4			16.3			14.9
Cost of revenue—amortization of acquired technology		2.1			2.4			2.6			2.1

Total cost of revenue		17.0			17.8			18.9			17.0

Gross profit		83.0			82.2			81.1			83.0
Marketing and selling		31.4			28.4			31.7			31.4
Research and development		10.4			11.1			14.9			10.4
General and administrative		16.6			13.8			21.7			16.6
Amortization of other intangible assets		1.7			3.3			1.8			1.7

Total operating expenses		60.1			56.6			70.1			60.1

Income from operations		22.9			25.6			11.0			22.9
Interest expense, net		0.5			0.6			0.6			0.5
Loss on foreign exchange		0.1			1.7			0.7			0.1
Gain on derivatives		(0.2	)		(0.5	)		(0.2	)		(0.2	)
Loss on extinguishment of debt		0.2			0.1			—			0.2

Total other expense		0.6			1.9			1.1			0.6
Income before provision for income taxes		22.3			23.7			9.9			22.3
Provision for income taxes		6.0			8.7			5.3			6.0

Net income		16.3	%		15.0	%		4.6	%		16.3	%

Revenues by Market. We view our operations and manage our business as one segment: the development, marketing and licensing of technologies and fonts. Factors used to identify our single segment include the financial information available for evaluation by our chief operating decision maker in making decisions about how to allocate resources and assess performance. While our technologies and services are sold to customers in two principal markets, Creative Professional and consumer device manufacturers and independent software vendors, together OEM, expenses and assets are not formally allocated to these markets, and operating results are assessed on an aggregate basis to make decisions about the allocation of resources.

The following table presents revenue for these two principal markets (in thousands):


	Three Months Ended September 30,				Increase (Decrease)			Three Months Ended September 30,				Increase (Decrease)
	2015		2014					2016		2015
Creative Professional	$	22,472	$	20,118	$	2,354		$	27,798	$	22,472	$	5,326
OEM		26,880		26,945		(65	)		24,431		26,880		(2,449	)

Total revenue	$	49,352	$	47,063	$	2,289		$	52,229	$	49,352	$	2,877

Revenue was ~~$49.4~~$52.2 million and ~~$47.1~~$49.4 million for the three months ended September 30, ~~2015~~2016 and ~~2014,~~2015, respectively, an increase of ~~$2.3~~$2.8 million, or ~~4.9%~~5.8%.

Creative Professional revenue ~~was~~increased $5.3 million, or 23.7%, to $27.8 million in the three months ended September 30, 2016, as compared to $22.5 ~~million and $20.1~~ million in the three months ended September 30, 2015, ~~and 2014, respectively, an increase of $2.4 million, or 11.7%,~~ mainly due to increased direct ~~revenue.~~revenue and revenue from Olapic. Direct revenue increased partially due to ~~increased sales~~licenses of ~~our web font services~~digital ads and partially due to increased recurring ~~royalties and~~ licenses of fonts for web server applications to enterprise customers. Olapic subscription sales also contributed to the increase in Creative Professional revenue period over period.

OEM revenue was ~~consistent at~~$24.4 million and $26.9 million in the three months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015, ~~and 2014.~~respectively, a decrease of $2.5 million, or 9.1%. Decreased ~~printer product~~ royalty revenue ~~was offset by increased license revenue~~ from our printer OEM customers and display imaging consumer electronic OEM customers was mainly due to lower volume of shipments and decreased license revenue from our independent software vendor ~~customers in the third quarter of 2015, as compared to the same period in 2014.~~customers.

Cost of revenue, excluding amortization of acquired technology, was ~~$7.4~~$8.5 million and ~~$7.2~~$7.4 million for the three months ended September 30, ~~2015~~2016 and ~~2014,~~2015, respectively, an increase of ~~$0.2~~$1.1 million, or ~~1.7%~~16.1%. AsThe increase in cost of revenue in the third quarter of 2016 is a ~~percentage~~result of a higher proportion of Creative Professional revenue in our mix of total revenue, which typically has a higher associated cost than OEM, partially offset by improved margins on our Creative Professional revenue with enterprise customers, as compared to the third quarter of 2015. Further, our Creative Professional revenue ~~excluding amortization~~has grown organically and from the acquisition of ~~acquired technology, was 14.9% and 15.4% for the three months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively, mainly due to product mix.~~Olapic, while our OEM revenue has declined as described above. In the three months ended September 30, ~~2015,~~2016, Creative Professional revenue was ~~45.5%~~53.2% of total revenue, as compared to ~~42.7%~~45.5% of total revenue in the same period in 2014. Our Creative Professional revenue has a higher associated cost than our OEM revenue because Creative Professional revenue typically contains a higher proportion of third party fonts. Accordingly, when Creative Professional revenue increases as a percentage of total revenue, we would normally expect our overall gross profit percentage to decrease. However, in the three months ended September 30, 2015, as compared to the same period in 2014, our Creative Professional revenue included several large contracts with enterprise customers that did not include third party fonts.2015.

The portion of cost of revenue consisting of amortization of acquired technology ~~was~~increased $0.3 million, or 26.6%, to $1.3 million for the three months ended September 30, 2016, as compared to $1.0 ~~million and $1.1~~ million for the three months ended September 30, 2015, ~~and 2014, respectively, a decrease~~primarily due to our acquisition of ~~$0.1 million, or 8.4%.~~Olapic.

Gross profit was ~~83.0%~~81.1% of sales in the three months ended September 30, ~~2015,~~2016, as compared to ~~82.2%~~83.0% in the three months ended September 30, ~~2014, an increase~~2015, a decrease of ~~0.8~~1.9 percentage ~~points. We achieved an improved gross profit on our Creative Professional revenue~~points due to variations in ~~the three months ended September 30, 2015,~~product mix, as detailed above.

Marketing and Selling.Marketing and selling expense was $16.5 million and $15.5 million, an increase of $1.0 million, or 6.9%, in the three months ended September 30, 2016 and ~~$13.4~~2015, respectively. Personnel expenses increased $1.6 million in the three months ended September 30, ~~2015 and 2014, respectively, an increase of $2.1 million, or 15.8%. Personnel expenses increased $1.1 million in the third quarter of 2015,~~2016, as compared to the same period in ~~2014,~~2015, primarily due to additional headcount ~~primarily~~ from our acquisition of Olapic and due to additional compensation expense in connection with an amendment to the Swyft Media ~~key hiring and higher share based compensation expense. Targeted~~Merger Agreement executed in November 2015. Other marketing related expenses decreased $0.7 million, mainly due to the timing of targeted spending, ~~including branding campaigns and website redesign increased $0.5 million~~ in the three months ended September 30, ~~2015,~~2016, as compared to the same period in ~~2014.~~2015.

Research and Development. Research and development expense ~~was consistent at~~increased $2.6 million, or 50.9% to $7.8 million in the three months ended September 30, 2016, as compared to $5.2 million in the three months ended September 30, 2015. Personnel and personnel related expenses increased $2.2 million in the third quarter of 2016, as compared to the same period in 2015, mainly due to additional headcount from our acquisition of Olapic. External consulting and ~~2014.~~related software development accounted for $0.2 million of the overall increase.

General and Administrative. General and administrative expense increased ~~$1.7~~$3.2 million, or ~~25.9%~~38.9%, to $11.4 million in the three months ended September 30, 2016, as compared to $8.2 million in the three months ended September 30, ~~2015, as compared to $6.5~~2015. Personnel and personnel related expenses increased $2.5 million in the three months ended September 30, ~~2014. Personnel and personnel related expenses increased $1.0 million in the three months ended September 30, 2015,~~2016, as compared to the same period in

~~2014, mainly~~ 2015, due to ~~key hiring~~additional headcount from our acquisition of Olapic and ~~higher share based compensation expense.~~other targeted hiring. Higher infrastructure expenses ~~primarily depreciation and~~generally resulting from the increased headcount, such as software ~~maintenance associated with our new ERP systems, and~~licenses, facilities related expenses ~~primarily associated with our new corporate office,~~and depreciation, contributed $0.6 million to the overall increase in general and administrative expense. In the three months ended September 30, 2014, we recognized a $0.6 million reduction in expense due to an estimate revision for contingent acquisition consideration. There was no similar item in the same period in 2015. These increases were partially offset by a $0.4 million decrease in professional service expenses in the third quarter of 2015, as compared to the same period in 2014, due to the timing of acquisition related expenses.

Amortization of Other Intangible Assets. Amortization of other intangible assets ~~decreased $0.7~~was $0.9 million ~~or 45.7%, to~~and $0.9 million in the three months ended September 30, 2016, and 2015, ~~as compared to $1.6 million in the three months ended September 30, 2014 mainly the result of an asset becoming fully amortized in the fourth quarter of 2014.~~respectively.

Interest expense, net of interest income was ~~$0.2~~$0.4 million and ~~$0.3~~$0.2 million in the three months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015, ~~and 2014,~~ respectively, ~~a decrease~~an increase of ~~$0.1~~$0.2 million, or ~~10.6%~~48.1%. Interest expense in the three months ended September 30, 2016 was primarily due to outstanding debt and unused line fees. Total debt outstanding at September 30, 2016 was $110.0 million, which was drawn on our revolving credit facility in connection with our acquisition of Olapic Inc. on August 9, 2016. There was no debt outstanding during the three months ended September 30, ~~2015 or during the same period in 2014.~~2015. Interest expense in ~~both time periods consists~~the three months ended September 30, 2015 consisted mainly of unused line fees in connection with our ~~previous~~original credit facility.

Loss on extinguishment of debt was $0.1 million in the three months ended September 30, 2015, which was incurred in connection with the refinancing of our Credit ~~Facility.~~Facility in September 2015. There was no similar item in the same period in 2016.

Losses on foreign exchange were $0.4 million and $44 thousand in the three months ended September 30, 2016 and ~~$0.8~~2015, respectively, an increase of $0.4 million, primarily due to the strengthening of the Japanese Yen as compared to the US dollar.

Gain on derivatives was $0.1 million and $0.1 million in the three months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015, ~~and 2014,~~ respectively, ~~a decrease of $0.8 million~~ primarily due to ~~the revaluation of foreign denominated liabilities.~~

~~Gain on derivatives were $0.1 million and $0.2 million in the three months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively, a decrease of $0.1 million, or 51.4%, resulting from~~ our ~~short term~~30-day forward currency contracts.

During the three months ended September 30, ~~2015~~2016 and ~~2014,~~2015, our effective tax rate was ~~27.0%~~52.7% and ~~36.8%~~27.0%, respectively. The increase in our effective rate is primarily due to a charge of 17.6% for non-deductible acquisition related expenses primarily from Olapic and Swyft that is contingent on continued employment. This is treated as compensation expense for GAAP purposes and is not deductible for tax purposes. This was partially offset by a benefit of 2.8% for research credits. There were no similar items in the same period in 2015. The legislation for the research credit for 2015 had not yet been passed as of September 30, 2015. The effective tax rate for the three months ended September 30, 2016 included a benefit of 4.9% for foreign rate differential, an increased benefit of 4.2% resulting from increased pretax net income in our UK subsidiaries, which is taxed at a lower rate than the applicable U.S. statutory rate. The effective tax rate for the three months ended September 30, 2015 included a benefit of ~~6.4%~~6.3% for the reversal of reserves in connection with a settlement of a U.S. federal tax audit of the Company’s 2012 tax return and the expiration of the statute of limitations on reserves related to the Company’s 2011 tax ~~returns,~~returns. There was no similar item in the same period in 2016. The effective tax rate included a charge of 3.0% for the third quarter of 2016 for state and local income taxes, net of federal benefit, as compared to a ~~benefit~~charge of 1.2% ~~for the reversal of reserves~~ in the 2014 effective tax rate. In addition, the effect of foreign income and dividends resulted in a 0.7% decrease in the 2015 effective tax rate, as compared to an increase of 4.0% in the 2014 effective tax rate, due to the changes in the profitability of the Company’s UK subsidiary, to an income position in 2015 from a loss position in 2014.2015.

Results of Operations for the Nine Months Ended September 30, ~~2015~~2016 Compared to Nine Months Ended September 30, ~~2014~~2015

The following table sets forth items in the condensed consolidated year-to-date ~~statement~~statements of income as a percentage of sales for the periods indicated:


	Nine Months Ended September 30,						Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2015			2014			2016			2015
Revenue:
Creative Professional		44.9	%		40.6	%		49.8	%		44.9	%
OEM		55.1			59.4			50.2			55.1

Total revenue		100.0			100.0			100.0			100.0
Cost of revenue		15.8			15.2			16.2			15.8
Cost of revenue—amortization of acquired technology		2.3			2.5			2.4			2.3

Total cost of revenue		18.1			17.7			18.6			18.1

Gross profit		81.9			82.3			81.4			81.9
Marketing and selling		30.3			26.5			30.0			30.3
Research and development		11.5			11.5			14.0			11.5
General and administrative		15.5			13.1			19.1			15.5
Amortization of other intangible assets		1.7			3.2			1.6			1.7

Total operating expenses		59.0			54.3			64.7			59.0

Income from operations		22.9			28.0			16.7			22.9
Interest expense, net		0.5			0.6			0.4			0.5
Loss on foreign exchange		0.4			0.7			0.5			0.4
Gain on derivatives								(0.2	)		—
Loss on extinguishment of debt		0.1			—			—			0.1

Total other expense		1.0			1.3			0.7			1.0
Income before provision for income taxes		21.9			26.7			16.0			21.9
Provision for income taxes		6.9			9.9			6.4			6.9

Net income		15.0	%		16.8	%		9.6	%		15.0	%

Revenue by Market. The following table presents revenue for these two principal markets (in thousands):


	Nine Months Ended September 30,				Increase (Decrease)			Nine Months Ended September 30,				Increase (Decrease)
	2015		2014					2016		2015
Creative Professional	$	63,654	$	56,103	$	7,551		$	75,170	$	63,654	$	11,516
OEM		78,149		81,995		(3,846	)		75,634		78,149		(2,515	)

Total revenue	$	141,803	$	138,098	$	3,705		$	150,804	$	141,803	$	9,001

Revenue was ~~$141.8~~$150.8 million and ~~$138.1~~$141.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, ~~2015~~2016 and ~~2014,~~2015, respectively, an increase of ~~$3.7~~$9.0 million, or ~~2.7%~~6.3%.

Creative Professional revenue increased ~~$7.6~~$11.5 million, or ~~13.5%~~18.1%, to ~~$63.7~~$75.2 million for the nine months ended September 30, ~~2015,~~2016, as compared to ~~$56.1~~$63.7 million in the same period in ~~2014,~~2015, mainly due to increased ~~web~~direct revenue and ~~direct revenue. Web~~revenue from Olapic. Direct revenue increased ~~mainly~~ due to licenses of digital ads and increased ~~desktop license revenue, together with increased sales~~recurring licenses of ~~our~~ web font services and fonts for web server applications to enterprise customers, in the nine months ended September 30, ~~2015,~~2016, as compared to the same period in ~~2014. Direct revenue increased partially due to increased~~2015. Olapic subscription sales of our web server applications licenses to enterprise customers, and partially due to increased web font services and recurring royalty revenues in the nine months ended September 30, 2015, as comparedalso contributed to the ~~same~~increase in Creative Professional revenue, period ~~in 2014.~~over period.

OEM revenue was ~~$78.1~~$75.6 million and ~~$82.0~~$78.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, ~~2015~~2016 and ~~2014,~~2015, respectively, a decrease of ~~$3.9~~$2.5 million, or ~~4.7%~~3.2%. Decreased revenue from per unit royalty arrangements with our printer imaging electronic OEM customers, primarily due to lower volume of shipments, and decreased revenue from our ~~printer and display imaging consumer electronic OEM~~independent software vendor customers, mainly due to the timing of revenue, was partially offset by increased revenue from our ~~independent software vendor customers.~~automotive display imaging OEM customers, period over period.

Cost of revenue, excluding amortization of acquired technology, was $24.4 million and $22.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively, an increase of $2.1 million, or 9.5%. The increase in cost of revenue in the nine months ended September 30, 2016 is a result of a higher proportion of Creative Professional revenue in our mix of total revenue which typically has a higher associated cost than OEM, partially offset by improved margins on our Creative Professional revenue with enterprise customers, as compared to ~~$21.1~~the third quarter of 2015. Further, our Creative Professional revenue has grown organically and from the acquisition of Olapic, while our OEM revenue has declined as described above. In the nine months ended September 30, 2016, Creative Professional revenue was 49.8% of total revenue, as compared to 44.9% of total revenue in the same period in 2015.

Amortization of acquired technology was $3.6 million and $3.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, ~~2014,~~2016 and 2015, respectively, an increase of ~~$1.2~~$0.3 million, or 6.0%. As a percentage of total revenue, cost of revenue, excluding amortization of acquired technology, was 15.8% and 15.2% for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively. The increase in cost of revenue, excluding amortization of acquired technology, was mainly8.3%, primarily due to ~~variations in product mix. In the nine months ended September 30, 2015, Creative Professional revenue was 44.9%~~our acquisition of total revenue, as compared to 40.6% of total revenue in the same period in 2014. Our Creative Professional revenue typically has a higher associated cost than our OEM revenue because Creative Professional revenue contains a higher proportion of third party fonts.

~~Amortization of acquired technology was $3.3 million and $3.4 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively, a decrease of $0.1 million, or 3.5%.~~Olapic.

Gross profit ~~decreased to~~was 81.4% and 81.9% in the nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015, ~~as compared to 82.3% in the nine months ended September 30, 2014,~~respectively, a decrease of 0.5 percentage points, due to variations in product ~~mix. In the nine months ended September 30, 2015, we had a higher percentage of Creative Professional revenue in total revenue,~~mix as ~~compared to the same period in 2014, which typically has a higher associated cost than our OEM revenue.~~detailed above.

Marketing and Selling.Marketing and selling expense ~~increased $6.5~~was $45.3 million and $43.0 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively, an increase of $2.3 million, or ~~17.9%, to $43.0~~5.3%. Personnel expenses increased $4.6 million in the nine months ended September 30, ~~2015,~~2016, as compared to ~~$36.5 million in~~ the same period in ~~2014. Personnel expenses increased $3.8 million~~2015 due to additional headcount ~~primarily~~ from our ~~acquisitions~~acquisition of Olapic and other targeted hiring, and additional compensation expense in connection with an amendment to the Swyft Media Merger Agreement executed in November 2015. The increase was partially offset by a reduction in headcount due to a redeployment of certain employees at the beginning of 2016 to development related activities from our sales and ~~FontShop, and increased share based compensation~~marketing organization. The increase was also partially offset by decreased marketing related expenses of $1.8 million due to the timing of targeted spending, in the nine months ended September 30, ~~2015,~~2016, as compared to the same period in ~~2014. Targeted marketing spending, including, branding campaigns, website redesign~~2015. Lower bank fees on web sales and ~~the development~~a decrease in bad debt together contributed a decrease of ~~marketing materials increased $1.7~~$0.6 million, period over period. Increased infrastructure expenses, primarily rent and depreciation, which is mainly associated with our new corporate office, contributed $0.6 million to the increase in the nine months ended September 30, 2015, as compared to the same period in 2014.

Research and Development. Research and development expense ~~was~~increased $4.9 million, or 29.9%, to $21.1 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2016, as compared to $16.2 ~~million and $15.9~~ million for the nine months ended September 30, 2015. Personnel and personnel related expenses increased $4.3 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2016, as compared to the same period in 2015, mainly due to additional headcount from our acquisition of Olapic. Higher infrastructure expenses, primarily software licenses and ~~2014, respectively, an increase of $0.3~~facilities related expenses, contributed $0.5 million ~~or 2.2%, mainly from an~~to the increase in research and development in the nine months ended September 30, 2016, as compared to the same period in 2015, a result of increased headcount. External consulting and related software ~~license and consulting expenses.~~development increased $0.4 million period over period. These increases were partially offset by a grant received related to the Company’s development work within Northern Ireland which contributed a decrease of $0.5 million.

General and Administrative. General and administrative expense increased ~~$4.0~~$6.7 million, or ~~22.2%~~30.6%, to $28.8 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2016, as compared to $22.1 million in the nine months ended September 30, ~~2015, as compared to $18.1~~2015. Personnel and personnel related expenses increased $5.2 million in the nine months ended September 30, ~~2014. Personnel~~2016, as compared to the same period in 2015, mainly due to additional headcount from our acquisition of Olapic and other targeted hiring. In the nine months ended September 30, 2015, approximately $0.6 million of personnel ~~related~~ expenses were capitalized in connection with our new ERP system. As the system was placed into service in the third quarter of 2015, there was no capitalization benefit in the same period in 2016, and associated depreciation expense contributed an additional $0.9 million to the overall increase in general and administrative expense. Professional service expense increased ~~$2.0~~$0.4 million in the nine months ended September 30, ~~2015, as compared to the same period in 2014, mainly~~2016, primarily due to increased share based compensation and key hiring. Higher infrastructure expenses contributed $1.1 million to the overall increase, mainly resulting from increased software maintenance and depreciation expenses, primarily associated with our newongoing ERP systems. In the nine months ended September 30, 2014, we recognized a $1.2 million reduction in expense resulting from an estimate revision of contingent acquisition consideration. There was no similar item in 2015. This was partially offset by a $0.6 million decrease in professional service expenses in the nine months ended September 30, 2015, resulting from the timing of acquisitions and non-recurring expenses.system support.

Amortization of Other Intangible Assets. Amortization of other intangible assets ~~decreased $2.1~~was $2.4 million ~~or 47.1%, to~~and $2.4 million for the nine months ended September, 30, 2016 and 2015, ~~as compared to $4.5 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2014, mainly the result of an asset becoming fully amortized in the fourth quarter of 2014.~~respectively.

Interest expense, net of interest income, was $0.5 million and $0.8 million in ~~both~~the nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively, a decrease of $0.3 million, or 29.2%. The decrease in interest expense in the nine months ended September 30, 2016, was partially due to a reduction in the unused line fee rate, in connection with the refinancing of our revolving credit facility in September 2015, and was partially offset by interest expense on the borrowings under our revolving line of credit. Total debt outstanding at September 30, 2016 was $110.0 million, which was drawn on our revolving credit facility in connection with our acquisition of Olapic Inc. on August 9, 2016. Prior to August 9, 2016, there was no debt outstanding. In the nine months ended September 30, 2015, ~~and 2014. Interest~~interest expense ~~in both periods~~ consisted mainly of unused line fees in connection with our ~~previous~~original credit facility, as there was no debt outstanding.

Loss on extinguishment of debt was $0.1 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2015, which was incurred in connection with the refinancing of our Credit ~~Facility.~~Facility in September 2015. There was no ~~debt outstanding during either period.~~similar item in the same period in 2016.

Loss on foreign exchange was ~~$0.7~~$0.8 million and ~~$1.0~~$0.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015, ~~and 2014,~~ respectively, ~~a decrease~~an increase of ~~$0.3~~$0.1 million, or ~~33.4%~~21.0%, mainly due to the revaluation of foreign denominated liabilities.

Gain on derivatives was $0.3 million and $48 thousand and ~~$33 thousand~~ for the nine months ended September 30, ~~2015~~2016 and ~~2014,~~2015, respectively, resulting from our ~~short term~~30-day forward currency contracts.

Our effective tax rate was ~~31.3%~~40.1% and ~~37.2%~~31.3% for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively. The increase in our effective rate is primarily due to a charge of 5.5% for non-deductible acquisition related expenses, partially offset by a benefit of 1.2% for research credits. The non-deductible acquisition related expense consists of purchase consideration primarily from Olapic and ~~2014, respectively.~~Swyft that is contingent on continued employment. This is compensation expense for GAAP purposes and is not deductible for tax purposes. There were no similar items in the same period in 2015 as the legislation for the research credit for 2015 had not yet been passed as of September 30, 2015. The effective tax rate for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 included a benefit of 2.1% for foreign income and dividends, as compared to a benefit of 0.8% in 2015, primarily resulting from the proportion of income increased in our UK subsidiary, which is taxed at a lower rate than the applicable U.S. statutory rate. The effective tax rate for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 included a benefit of 3.3% for the reversal of reserves related to the settlements of tax audits in the U.S. and Japan, as well as the expiration of the statute of limitations on reserves related to the Company’s 2011 tax ~~returns, as compared to a benefit of 0.4%~~returns. There was no similar item in the ~~2014 effective tax rate. Additionally, the effect of foreign income and dividends resulted~~same period in a 0.8% decrease in the 2015 effective tax rate, as compared to an increase of 1.7% in the 2014 effective tax rate, due to changes in the profitability of the Company’s UK subsidiary from a loss position in 2014, to an income position in 2015. The effective tax rate included a charge of 1.3% for state and local income taxes, net of federal benefit, as compared to a charge of 1.9% in 2014.2016.

Cash Flows for the Nine Months Ended September 30, ~~2015~~2016 and ~~2014~~2015

Since our inception, we have financed our operations primarily through cash from operations, private and public stock sales and long-term debt arrangements, as described below. We believe our existing cash and cash equivalents, our cash flow from operating activities and available bank borrowings will be sufficient to meet our anticipated cash needs for at least the next twelve months. At September 30, ~~2015,~~2016, our principal sources of liquidity were cash and cash equivalents totaling ~~$86.3~~$97.6 million and a $150.0 million revolving Credit Facility, of which we have borrowed $110.0 million for the acquisition of Olapic Inc. on August 9, 2016. On August 30, 2016, our Board of Director’s approved a $25.0 million share purchase program, with purchases permitted through December 31, 2017. At September 30, 2016, there ~~were~~have been no ~~outstanding borrowings.~~purchases under the plan. In the nine months ended September 30, 2015, we used $18.2 million in cash to repurchase shares in connection with our share repurchase program approved in October 2013 and completed in June 2015, after reaching the maximum cumulative spend. We also used $0.4 million in cash to repurchase shares in excess of our previously approved share repurchase program. Our future working capital requirements will depend on many factors, including the operations of our existing business, our potential strategic expansion and future acquisitions we might undertake.

The following table presents our cash flows from operating activities, investing activities and financing activities for the periods presented (in thousands):


	Nine Months Ended September 30,						Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2015			2014			2016			2015
Net cash provided by operating activities	$	40,252		$	46,398		$	31,947		$	40,252
Net cash used in investing activities		(22,094	)		(15,195	)		(122,044	)		(22,094	)
Net cash used in financing activities		(21,699	)		(26,439	)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities								99,833			(21,699	)
Effect of exchange rates on cash and cash equivalents		(469	)		(587	)		327			(469	)

(Decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents	$	(4,010	)	$	4,177
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents							$	10,063		$	(4,010	)

Significant variations in operating cash flows may occur because, from time-to-time, our customers make prepayments against future royalties. Prepayments may be required under the terms of our license agreements and are occasionally made on an elective basis and often cause large fluctuations in accounts receivable and deferred revenue. The timing and extent of such prepayments significantly impacts our cash balances.

We generated $31.9 million in cash from operations during the nine months ended September 30, 2016. Net income, after adjusting for depreciation and amortization, amortization of deferred financing costs and accretion of interest, share based compensation, excess tax benefit on stock options, provision for doubtful accounts, deferred income taxes and unrealized currency gain on foreign denominated intercompany transactions generated $38.9 million in cash. In connection with the acquisition of Olapic Inc. on August 9, 2016, we used $9.0 million to fund an escrow account to be used for future payments due in 2018 and 2019 under the agreement. Accrued income taxes generated $0.9 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2016. Deferred revenue, net of increased accounts receivable generated $1.5 million net in cash, which is mainly due to the timing of a large contract signing. Increases in accrued expenses and other liabilities, and prepaid expenses and other assets, combined with a decrease in accounts payable used $0.4 million net in cash, which is mainly due to the timing of payments.

We generated $40.3 million in cash from operations during the nine months ended September 30, 2015. Net income, after adjusting for depreciation and amortization, loss on retirement of fixed assets, loss on debt extinguishment, amortization of deferred financing costs and accretion of interest, share based compensation, excess tax benefit on stock options, provision for doubtful accounts, deferred income taxes and unrealized currency gain on foreign denominated intercompany transactions generated $40.8 million in cash. Increases in accrued expenses and other liabilities, and accounts payable, combined with a decrease in prepaid expenses and other assets generated $3.0 million, which is mainly due to the timing of payments including a higher dividend accrual. Accrued income taxes generated $1.1 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2015. Increased accounts receivable, and decreased deferred revenue used $4.7 million net in cash, which is mainly due to the timing of a large contract signing.

~~We generated $46.4 million in cash from operations during~~During the nine months ended September 30, 2014. Net income, after adjusting for depreciation and amortization, adjustment to contingent consideration, loss on retirement of fixed assets, amortization of deferred financing costs and accretion of interest, share based compensation, excess tax benefit on stock options, provision for doubtful accounts, deferred income taxes and unrealized currency gain on foreign denominated intercompany transactions generated $39.12016, we used $122.0 million in ~~cash. A decrease in accrued expenses and other liabilities used $0.8 million, primarily a result~~investing activities for the purchase of the payment of 2013 accrued variable compensation amounts. Accrued income taxes generated $6.5 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2014. Increases in accounts receivable, deferred revenue and accounts payable combined with decreases in prepaid expenses and other assets generated $1.6 million ~~in cash, which is mainly due to the timing~~ of ~~payments.~~

property and equipment and $120.4 million for acquisitions. During the nine months ended September 30, 2015, we used $22.1 million in investing activities mainly for the purchase of $7.8 million of property and equipment and $14.3 million for acquisitions. ~~During~~

Cash generated from financing activities for the nine months ended September 30, ~~2014, we used $15.2~~2016 was $99.8 million. Cash borrowed from our revolving Credit Facility for the acquisition of Olapic Inc. generated $110.0 million. We received cash from the exercises of stock options of $2.4 million and the excess tax benefit on stock options provided $0.4 million. We paid cash dividends of $13.0 million in ~~investing activities mainly for~~ the ~~purchase of $4.5 million of property and equipment and $10.7 million for acquisitions.~~

Cash used in financing activities for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 was $21.7 million. We received cash from the exercises of stock options of $6.6 million and the excess tax benefit on stock options provided $1.7 million. We paid cash dividends of $11.1 million, contingent consideration payments of $0.3 million, and purchased $18.6 million in treasury stock in the nine months ended September 30, 2015.

Cash used in financing activities for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 was $26.4 million. We received cash from the exercises of stock options of $5.3 million and the excess tax benefit on stock options provided $3.0 million. We paid cash dividends of $8.7 million. We also purchased $26.1 million in treasury stock in the nine months ended September 30, 2014.

On July ~~22, 2015~~26, 2016 our Board of Directors approved a ~~$0.10~~$0.11 per share or ~~$4.0~~$4.6 million, quarterly cash dividend on our outstanding common stock. The record date was October ~~1, 2015~~3, 2016 and the dividend was paid to shareholders of record on October 21, ~~2015.~~2016. We anticipate this to be a recurring quarterly dividend with future payments and record dates, subject to board approval. On October 26, ~~2015,~~2016, the Company’s Board of Directors approved a ~~$0.10~~$0.11 per share quarterly cash dividend on our outstanding common stock. The record date is set for January ~~4, 2016~~2, 2017 and the dividend is payable to shareholders of record on January ~~22, 2016.~~20, 2017.

On September 15, 2015, the Company entered into a new credit agreement (the “~~New~~“New Credit ~~Agreement~~”Agreement”) by and among the Company, the Company’s subsidiary, Monotype Imaging Inc., any financial institution that becomes a Lender (as defined therein) and Silicon Valley Bank, (“~~SVB”),~~ as agent which provides for a five-year $150.0 million secured revolving credit facility (the “~~Credit Facility~~”“Credit Facility”). The Credit Facility permits the Company to request that the Lenders, at their election, increase the secured credit facility to a maximum of $200.0 million. The Credit Facility is available to the Company on a revolving basis through September 15, 2020. Repayment of any amounts borrowed are not required until maturity of the Credit Facility. However, the Company may repay any amounts borrowed at any time, without premium or penalty. The Credit Facility provides more attractive interest rates and a lower commitment fee than those under the Original Credit Agreement, as defined below. The New Credit Agreement replaced the Company’s existing $120.0 million revolving credit facility (the “~~Original~~“Original Credit ~~Agreement~~”Agreement”) by and between the Company and Wells Fargo Capital Finance, LLC. The Original Credit Agreement was terminated effective September 15, 2015 and was scheduled to expire on July 13, 2016. At September 30, 2016, the Company had $110.0 million outstanding under the Credit Facility.

Borrowings under the Credit Facility bear interest through September 15, 2020 at a variable rate not less than zero based upon, at the Company’s option, either LIBOR or the higher of (i) the prime rate as published in the Wall Street Journal and (ii) 0.5% plus the overnight federal funds rate, plus in each case, an applicable margin. The applicable margin for LIBOR loans, based on the applicable leverage ratio, is 1.25%, 1.50% or 1.75% per annum, and the applicable margin for base rate loans, based on the applicable leverage ratio, is either 0.25%, 0.50% or 0.75%% per annum. At September 30, ~~2015~~2016 our rate, inclusive of applicable margins, was ~~1.4%~~1.8% for LIBOR. ~~At September 30, 2015, the Company had no outstanding debt under the Credit Facility.~~ The Company is required to pay a commitment fee, based on the applicable leverage ratio, equal to 0.20%, 0.25% or 0.30% per annum on the undrawn portion available under the revolving credit facility and variable per annum fees in respect of outstanding letters of credit. In connection with the New Credit Agreement, the Company incurred closing and legal fees of ~~approximately $0.8~~$1.0 million, which have been accounted for as deferred financing costs and will be amortized to interest expense over the term of the New Credit Agreement. In addition, $0.1 million of unamortized deferred financing costs associated with the pro-rata share of prior loan syndicate lenders that did not participate in the new facility were written off and charged to other expense in the third quarter of 2015.

In addition to other covenants, the New Credit Agreement places limits on the Company and its subsidiaries’ ability to incur debt or liens and engage in sale-leaseback transactions, make loans and investments, incur additional indebtedness, engage in mergers, acquisitions and asset sales, transact with affiliates and alter its business. The New Credit Agreement also contains events of default, and affirmative covenants, including financial maintenance covenants which include (i) a maximum ratio of consolidated total debt to consolidated adjusted EBITDA of 3.00 to 1.00, and (ii) a minimum consolidated fixed charge coverage ratio of 1.25 to 1.00. Adjusted EBITDA, under the Credit Facility, is defined as consolidated net income (or loss), plus net interest expense, income taxes, depreciation and amortization, and share based compensation expense, plus acquisition expenses not to exceed $2.0 million on a trailing twelve month basis, plus restructuring, issuance costs, cash non-operating costs and other expenses or losses minus cash non-operating gains and other non-cash gains. As of September 30, ~~2015,~~2016, the maximum leverage ratio permitted was 3.00:1.00 and our leverage ratio was ~~0.00:~~1.69:1.00 and the minimum fixed charge coverage ratio was 1.25:1.00 and our fixed charge ratio was ~~4.10:~~4.19:1.00. Failure to comply with these covenants, or the occurrence of an event of default, could permit the Lenders under the New Credit Agreement to declare all amounts borrowed under the New Credit Agreement, together with accrued interest and fees, to be immediately due and payable. In addition, the Credit Facility is secured by a lien on substantially all of the Company’s and its domestic subsidiaries’ tangible and intangible property by a pledge of all of the equity interests of the Company’s direct and indirect domestic subsidiaries and by a pledge by the Company’s domestic subsidiaries of 65% of the equity of their direct foreign subsidiaries, subject to limited exceptions. ~~We were in compliance with all covenants under our Credit Facility as of September 30, 2015.~~

The following table presents a reconciliation from net income, which is the most directly comparable GAAP operating performance measure, to EBITDA and from EBITDA to Adjusted EBITDA as defined in our Credit Facility (in thousands):


	Three Months Ended September 30,					Nine Months Ended September 30,					Three Months Ended September 30,				Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2015		2014			2015		2014			2016		2015		2016		2015
Net income	$	8,039	$	7,039		$	21,300	$	23,175		$	2,425	$	8,039	$	14,436	$	21,300
Provision for income taxes		2,975		4,102			9,717		13,759			2,707		2,975		9,671		9,717
Interest expense, net		237		265			775		791			351		237		549		775
Depreciation and amortization		2,810		3,177			7,906		9,147			3,343		2,810		9,114		7,906

EBITDA	$	14,061	$	14,583		$	39,698	$	46,872		$	8,826	$	14,061	$	33,770	$	39,698
Share based compensation		3,600		2,819			9,841		7,835			5,306		3,600		12,705		9,841
Non-cash add backs		112		(600	)		112		(1,152	)		—		112		—		112
Restructuring, issuance and cash non-operating costs		285		753			484		792			19		285		497		484
Acquisition expenses		—		986			339		1,384			1,125		—		1,125		339

Adjusted EBITDA⁽¹⁾	$	18,058	$	18,541		$	50,474	$	55,731		$	15,276	$	18,058	$	48,097	$	50,474

The Credit Facility also contains provisions for an increased interest rate during periods of default. We do not believe that these covenants will affect our ability to operate our business, and we were in compliance with the covenants under our Credit Facility as of September 30, ~~2015.~~2016.

In addition to Adjusted EBITDA as discussed above, we rely internally on certain measures that are not calculated according to GAAP. This non-GAAP measure is net adjusted EBITDA, which is defined as income (loss) from operations before depreciation, amortization of acquired intangible assets and share based compensation expenses. We use net adjusted EBITDA as a principal indicator of the operating performance of our business. We use net adjusted EBITDA in internal forecasts and models when establishing internal operating budgets, supplementing the financial results and forecasts reported to our board of directors, determining bonus compensation for our employees based on operating performance and evaluating short-term and long-term operating trends in our operations. We believe that net adjusted EBITDA permits a comparative assessment of our operating performance, relative to our performance based on our GAAP results, while isolating the effects of charges that may vary from period-to-period without direct correlation to underlying operating performance. We believe that these non-GAAP financial adjustments are useful to investors because they allow investors to evaluate the effectiveness of the methodology and information used by management in our financial and operational decision-making. We believe that trends in our net adjusted EBITDA may be valuable indicators of our operating performance.

In November 2015, we revised our definition of non-GAAP net adjusted EBITDA to exclude the impact of acquisition-related contingent consideration adjustments. The impact of these adjustments has been added back in calculating non-GAAP net adjusted EBITDA. This change more accurately reflects management’s view of the Company’s business and financial performance.

The following table presents a reconciliation from net income, ~~from operations,~~ which is the most directly comparable GAAP operating financial measure, to net adjusted EBITDA as used by management (in thousands):


	Three Months Ended September 30,				Nine Months Ended September 30,				Three Months Ended September 30,				Nine Months Ended September 30,
									2016		2015⁽¹⁾		2016		2015⁽¹⁾
Net income									$	2,425	$	8,039	$	14,436	$	21,300
Interest expense, net										351		237		549		775
Other (income) expense, net										272		42		479		724
Provision for income taxes										2,707		2,975		9,671		9,717
	2015		2014		2015		2014
Income from operations	$	11,293	$	12,026	$	32,516	$	38,725	$	5,755	$	11,293	$	25,135	$	32,516
Depreciation and amortization		2,810		3,177		7,906		9,147		3,343		2,810		9,114		7,906
Share based compensation		3,600		2,819		9,841		7,835		5,306		3,600		12,705		9,841
Contingent consideration adjustment⁽²⁾										1,077		—		2,233		—

Net adjusted EBITDA⁽¹⁾	$	17,703	$	18,022	$	50,263	$	55,707
Net adjusted EBITDA⁽³⁾									$	15,481	$	17,703	$	49,187	$	50,263

In our quarterly earnings press releases and conference calls, in addition to Adjusted EBITDA and net adjusted EBITDA as discussed above, we discuss a key measure that is not calculated according to GAAP. This non-GAAP measure is non-GAAP earnings per diluted share, which is defined as earnings per diluted share before amortization of acquired intangible assets and share based compensation expenses. We use non-GAAP earnings per diluted share as one of our principal indicators of the operating performance of our business. We use non-GAAP earnings per diluted share in internal forecasts, supplementing the financial results and forecasts reported to our board of directors and evaluating short-term and long-term operating trends in our operations. We believe that non-GAAP earnings per diluted share permits a comparative assessment of our operating performance, relative to our performance based on our GAAP results, while isolating the effects of charges that may vary from period-to-period without direct correlation to underlying operating performance. We believe that these non-GAAP financial adjustments are useful to investors because they allow investors to evaluate the effectiveness of the methodology and information used by management in our financial and operational decision-making. We believe that trends in our non-GAAP earnings per diluted share may be valuable indicators of our operating performance.

In November 2015, we revised our definition of non-GAAP earnings per diluted share to exclude the impact of acquisition-related contingent consideration adjustments. The impact of these adjustments has been added back in calculating non-GAAP earnings per diluted share. This change more accurately reflects management’s view of the Company’s business and financial performance.

The following table presents a reconciliation from earnings per diluted share, which is the most directly comparable GAAP measure, to non-GAAP earnings per diluted share as used by management:

The table below summarizes our operating lease contractual obligations at September 30, 2016 and the effects of such obligations on liquidity and cash flow in future years (in thousands). There is no change in our other contractual obligations from those disclosed in Part II, Item 7 of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015.

Information concerning recently issued accounting pronouncements may be found in Note 3 to our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

We are exposed to financial market risk, including interest rate risk and foreign currency exchange risk.

Financial instruments that potentially subject us to concentrations of credit risk consist principally of cash and cash equivalents and trade receivables. Cash equivalents consist primarily of bank deposits and certain investments, such as commercial paper, corporate securities and municipal securities, with maturities less than 90 days or containing seven day guaranteed put features to the issuer. Deposits of cash held outside the United States totaled approximately ~~$11.0~~$23.6 million and ~~$10.3~~$15.3 million at September 30, ~~2015~~2016 and December 31, ~~2014,~~2015, respectively.

We grant credit to customers in the ordinary course of business. Credit evaluations are performed on an ongoing basis to reduce credit risk, and no collateral is required from our customers. An allowance for uncollectible accounts is provided for those accounts receivable considered to be uncollectible based upon historical experience and credit evaluation. One customer individually accounted for ~~29.4%~~14.8% of our gross accounts receivable as of September 30, ~~2015.~~2016. At December 31, ~~2014, one customer~~2015, none of our customers individually accounted for ~~10.1%~~10% or more of our gross accounts receivable. Due to the nature of our quarterly revenue streams derived from royalty revenue, it is not unusual for our accounts receivable balances to include a few customers with large balances. Historically, we have not recorded material losses due to customers’ nonpayment. Our Creative Professional business consists of a higher volume of lower dollar value transactions. Accordingly, as the percent of Creative Professional revenue increases in relation to total revenue, we expect the average time to collect our accounts receivables, and our overall accounts receivables balances, to increase.

For the three and nine months ended September 30, ~~2015~~2016 and ~~2014,~~2015, no one customer accounted for more than 10% of our revenue.

In the past we have used interest rate derivative instruments to hedge our exposure to interest rate volatility resulting from our variable rate debt. ASC Topic No.815,Derivatives and Hedging, or ASC 815, requires that all derivative instruments be reported on

the balance sheet at fair value and establishes criteria for designation and effectiveness of hedging relationships, including a requirement that all designations must be made at the inception of each instrument. As we did not make such initial designations, ASC 815 requires changes in the fair value of the derivative instrument to be recognized as current period income or expense.

The fair value of derivative instruments is estimated based on the amount that we would receive or pay to terminate the agreements at the reporting date. Our exposure to market risk associated with changes in interest rates relates primarily to our long term debt. The interest rate on our Credit Facility fluctuates with either the prime rate or the LIBOR interest rate. At September 30, ~~2015 and~~2016, the Company had $110.0 million outstanding under our revolving credit facility. At December 31, ~~2014,~~2015, the Company had no borrowings under our revolving Credit Facility. Historically, we have purchased interest rate swap instruments to hedge our exposure to interest rate fluctuations on our debt obligations.

In accordance with ASC Topic No. 830,Foreign Currency Matters, or ASC 830, all assets and liabilities of our foreign subsidiaries whose functional currency is a currency other than U.S. dollars are translated into U.S. dollars at an exchange rate as of the balance sheet date. Revenue and expenses of these subsidiaries are translated at the average monthly exchange rates. The resulting translation adjustments as calculated from the translation of our foreign subsidiaries to U.S. dollars are recorded as a separate component of stockholders’ equity. For the three months ended September 30, ~~2015~~2016 and ~~2014,~~2015, sales by our subsidiaries located outside North America, particularly the U.K, Germany and Japan, comprised ~~45.0%~~38.3% and ~~46.8%~~45.0%, respectively, of our total revenue. For the nine months ended September 30, ~~2015~~2016 and ~~2014,~~2015, sales by our subsidiaries located outside North America comprised ~~44.6%~~43.0% and ~~46.7%~~44.6%, respectively, of our total revenue. An effect of a 10% strengthening of the British pound sterling, the Euro orand Japanese yen, relative to the U.S. dollar, would have decreased our revenues by ~~$4.9~~$2.5 million, ~~increased~~decreased expenses by ~~$3.0~~$1.9 million and decreased operating income by ~~$1.1~~$0.6 million for the three months ended September 30, ~~2015.~~2016. For the nine months ended September 30, ~~2015,~~2016, a 10% strengthening of the British pound sterling, the Euro orand Japanese yen, relative to the U.S. dollar, would have decreased our revenues by ~~$14.2~~$7.8 million, ~~increased~~decreased expenses by ~~$8.4~~$6.1 million and decreased operating income by ~~$3.3~~$1.7 million. The sensitivity analysis assumes that all currencies move in the same direction at the same time and the ratio of non-U.S. dollar denominated revenue and expenses to U.S. dollar denominated revenue and expenses does not change from current levels.

We incur foreign currency exchange gains and losses related to certain customers that are invoiced in U.S. dollars, but who have the option to make an equivalent payment in their own functional currencies at a specified exchange rate as of a specified date. In the period from that date until payment in the customer’s functional currency is received and converted into U.S. dollars, we can incur realized gains and losses. We also incur foreign currency exchange gains and losses on certain intercompany assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies. We are currently utilizing 30-day forward contracts to mitigate our exposure on these currency fluctuations. Any increase or decrease in the fair value of the forward contracts is offset by the change in the value of the hedged assets of our consolidated foreign affiliate. At ~~both~~ September 30, ~~2015 and December 31, 2014~~2016 there was one currency contract outstanding, to purchase and sell two different currencies, which was entered into on those dates, and accordingly, the fair value was materially equivalent to its book value. There were no outstanding forward contracts at December 31, 2015.

Our management, with the participation of our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of September 30, ~~2015.~~2016. The term “disclosure controls and procedures,” as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Exchange Act, means controls and other procedures of a company that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by a company in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by a company in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to the company’s management, including its principal executive and principal financial officers, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Management recognizes that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving their objectives, and management necessarily applies its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures. Our disclosure controls and procedures are designed to provide a reasonable assurance of achieving their objectives.

Based on the evaluation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of September 30, ~~2015,~~2016, our principal executive officer and principal financial officer concluded that, as of such date, the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective at the reasonable assurance level.

There was no change in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) that occurred during the fiscal quarter ended September 30, ~~2015~~2016 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

Except as noted below, there are no material changes in our risk factors from those disclosed in Part I, Item 1A of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, ~~2014.~~2015.

We conduct a substantial portion of our business outside North America and, as a result, we face diverse risks related to engaging in international business.

We have offices in six foreign countries and we are dedicating a significant portion of our sales efforts in countries outside North America. We are dependent on international sales for a substantial amount of our total revenue. In 2015, 2014 and 2013, approximately 45.5%, 47.6% and 45.3%, respectively, of our total revenue was derived from operations outside the U.S. and we expect that international sales will continue to represent a substantial portion of our revenue for the foreseeable future. This future international revenue will depend on the continued use and expansion of our type and technologies, including the licensing of our solutions worldwide.

If we are unsuccessful in managing these risks, our business and results of operations could be adversely affected.

The following table provides information about purchases by the Company during the quarter ended September 30, ~~2015~~2016 of equity securities that are registered by the Company pursuant to Section 12 of the Exchange Act:

The exhibits listed in the Exhibit Index immediately preceding the exhibits are filed as part of this Quarterly Report onForm 10-Q and such Exhibit Index is incorporated herein by reference.

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.


Delaware		20-3289482
(State of incorporation)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

600 Unicorn Park Drive Woburn, Massachusetts		01801
(Address of principal executive offices)		(Zip Code)


					Page
Part I. Financial Information			23

Item 1.	Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)		23

	•	Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of September 30, ~~2015~~2016 and December 31, ~~2014~~2015		23

	•	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income for the three and nine months ended September 30, ~~2015~~2016 and ~~2014~~		3

	•	~~Condensed Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income for the three and nine months ended September 30,~~ 2015 ~~and 2014~~		4

	• Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015		5

	•	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015 ~~and 2014~~		56

	•	Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements		67

Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations		18

Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk		3031

Item 4.	Controls and Procedures		3133

Part II. Other Information			3233

Item 1.	Legal Proceedings		3233

Item 1A.	Risk Factors		3233

Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds		3234

Item 3.	Defaults Upon Senior Securities		3234

Item 4.	Mine Safety Disclosures		3235

Item 5.	Other Information		3335

Item 6.	Exhibits		3335

Signatures			3436

Exhibit Index			3537


	Estimated Fair Value at Acquisition Date
Cash	$	5,942
Accounts receivable and other current assets		3,125
Property and equipment and other assets		1,029
Goodwill		88,745
Identifiable intangible assets		33,000
Accounts payable and other accrued expenses		(6,176	)
Deferred tax liability		(1,966	)

Total purchase price		123,699


	Three Months Ended September 30, 2015		Nine Months Ended September 30, 2015
Fair value measurement at the beginning of period	$	4,997	$	—
Contingent consideration recorded upon acquisition		—		4,900
Accreted interest		58		155

Fair value measurement at end of period	$	5,055	$	5,055


	Number of employees
Marketing and selling		117
Research and development		68
General and administration		13

Total		198


	Estimated Fair Value at Acquisition Date (in thousands)		Estimated Useful Life (in years)
Developed technology	$	16,600		10
Customer relationships		7,900		10
Non-compete agreements		1,500		4
Indefinite-lived intangible assets:
Trademarks and tradenames		7,000

Total	$	33,000


	September 30, 2015			December 31, 2014
Computer equipment and software	$	15,885		$	12,084
Furniture and fixtures		1,691			1,093
Leasehold improvements		5,479			3,498

Total cost		23,055			16,675
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization		(7,750	)		(6,097	)

Property and equipment, net	$	15,305		$	10,578


Balance at December 31, 2015	$	185,735
Acquisition		88,745
Foreign currency exchange rate changes		654

Balance at September 30, 2016	$	275,134


Years ending September 30:
2017	$	4,655
2018		4,010
2019		3,465
2020		2,684
2021		2,659
Thereafter		6,490

Total	$	23,963


Contractual Obligations	Total		October 2016 - September 2017		October 2017 - September 2019		October 2019 - September 2021		Thereafter
Operating leases	$	23,963	$	4,655	$	7,475	$	5,343	$	6,490


Period	Total Number of Shares Purchased⁽¹⁾		Average Price Paid per Share		Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs		Maximum Number (or Approximate Dollar Value) of Shares that May Yet be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs
July 14, 2015 to July 29, 2015		1,275	$	0.00		—	$	—
August 6, 2015		375		0.00		—		—
September 1, 2015 to September 30, 2015		7,834		0.00		—		—

Total		9,484	$	0.00		—	$	—


Period	Total Number of Shares Purchased⁽¹⁾		Average Price Paid per Share		Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs		Maximum Number (or Approximate Dollar Value) of Shares that May Yet be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs
July 1, 2016 to July 15, 2016		2,995	$	0.00		—	$	—
August 5, 2016 to August 23, 2016		2,000		0.00		—		—
September 2, 2016 to September 30, 2016		11,870		0.00		—		—

Total		16,865	$	0.00		—	$	—


	MONOTYPE IMAGING HOLDINGS INC.

Date: ~~November 2, 2015~~October 31, 2016	By:	/S/ DS~~OUGLAS~~COTT ~~J. S~~E. L~~HAW~~ANDERS
		~~Douglas J. Shaw~~Scott E. Landers
		President, Chief Executive Officer, ~~and~~ Director,
		~~(Principal Executive Officer)~~

~~Date: November 2, 2015~~	~~By:~~	/S~~/ JOSEPH~~ ~~D. HILL~~
		~~Joseph D. Hill~~
		~~Executive Vice President and~~ Interim Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer (Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer)


Exhibit No.		Description

~~10.1~~2.1		~~Employment agreement~~Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of July 20, 2016 by and ~~between Joseph D. Hill and~~among Monotype Imaging Inc., ~~effective~~Project Wave Acquisition Sub Inc., Olapic, Inc. and Shareholder Representative Services LLC as the Stockholders’ Representative (1)

10.1		Form of ~~September 8, 2015 (1)~~Restricted Stock Agreement under the Second Amended and Restated 2007 Stock Option and Incentive Plan *

10.2		~~Credit Agreement by and among~~First Amendment to Monotype Imaging Holdings Inc.~~, as Guarantor, Monotype Imaging Inc., as Borrower, the Lenders (as defined herein) and Silicon Valley Bank, dated as of September 15, 2015.~~ 2010 Inducement Stock Plan (2)

10.3		~~Guarantee~~Form of Non-Qualified Option Agreement under the 2010 Inducement Plan *

10.4		Form of Restricted Stock Agreement under the 2010 Inducement Plan *

10.5		Form of Restricted Stock Unit Agreement under the 2010 Inducement Plan (2)

10.6		Lease, dated October 8, 2015, between WFP Tower D Co. L.P. and ~~Collateral Agreement by~~Olapic, Inc.*

10.7		Lease, dated October 14, 2016, between Pawan Impex Private Limited and ~~among the Guarantors (as defined therein) and Silicon Valley Bank, dated as of September 15, 2015. (2)~~Monotype Solutions India Private Limited*

31.1		Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, by Chief Executive Officer. *

~~31.2~~		~~Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, by~~Officer and Chief Financial Officer. Officer

32.1		Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, by Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial ~~Officer.~~Officer **

101.INS		XBRL Instance Document

101.SCH		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document

101.CAL		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document

101.DEF		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document

101.LAB		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document

101.PRE		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document

Large accelerated filer

Accelerated filer

Non-accelerated filer

Smaller reporting company