Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. YES x NO ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T(§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). YES x NO ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definition of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). YES ¨ NO x

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date: ~~2,712,616~~3,217,434 shares of Common Stock, with no par value per share, outstanding as of ~~November 13, 2015.~~May 5, 2016.


	September 30,		December 31,
(In thousands, except share data)	2015		2014		March 31, 2016		December 31, 2015
	(Unaudited)		(Audited)		(Unaudited)		(Audited)
Assets
Cash and due from banks	$	6,514	$	8,477	$	13,145	$	14,679
Interest bearing deposits		7,748		6,103		11,204		7,018

Cash and cash equivalents		14,262		14,580		24,349		21,697
Interest bearing time deposits with banks		991		992		990		991
Investment securities available for sale		53,853		48,818		73,317		75,850
Mortgage loans held for sale		—		216		594		1,094
Loans, net of allowance for loan losses of $3,994 - 2015; $3,792 - 2014		348,314		338,901
Loans, net of allowance for loan losses of $3,717 - 2016; $4,365 - 2015						397,765		405,480
Premises and equipment		11,696		11,440		12,349		12,373
Accrued interest receivable		1,368		1,237		1,610		1,594
Restricted investments in bank stocks		1,478		1,002		1,596		2,315
Cash value of life insurance		8,782		8,587		11,846		11,764
Foreclosed assets		1,057		1,022		1,043		885
Goodwill		2,297		2,297		4,757		4,757
Intangible assets		1,175		1,381		1,425		1,501
Deferred tax assets						7,097		7,444
Other assets		6,692		5,673		2,177		1,704

Total Assets	$	451,965	$	436,146	$	540,915	$	549,449

Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity
Liabilities
Deposits:
Demand, non-interest bearing	$	54,020	$	53,620	$	69,935	$	70,106
Demand, interest bearing		139,396		132,860		135,663		131,564
Savings and money market		93,294		83,748		114,753		110,526
Time		92,025		102,034		135,153		136,146

Total deposits		378,735		372,262		455,504		448,342
Capital lease payable		—		1,655
Short-term borrowings		23,333		12,500		25,000		42,575
Long-term borrowings		7,350		7,000		11,400		9,350
Accrued interest payable		93		154		267		236
Other liabilities		5,734		4,367		5,766		6,643

Total Liabilities		415,245		397,938		497,937		507,146

Shareholders’ Equity
Preferred stock, 2015 and 2014, no par value; authorized 3,000,000 shares		—		—
Common stock, 2015 and 2014, no par value; authorized 5,000,000 shares; issued and outstanding 2015 2,711,258 shares; 2014 2,708,840 shares		22,077		22,077
Preferred stock, 2016 and 2015, no par value; authorized 3,000,000 shares						—		—
Common stock, 2016 and 2015 no par value; authorized 5,000,000 shares; issued and outstanding 2016 3,206,927 shares and 2015 3,205,544 shares						22,077		22,077
Surplus		254		201		6,812		6,784
Retained earnings		14,329		15,795		13,861		13,550
Accumulated other comprehensive income		60		135
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)						228		(108	)

Total Shareholders’ Equity		36,720		38,208		42,978		42,303

Total Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity	$	451,965	$	436,146	$	540,915	$	549,449

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.


	Three Months Ended						Nine Months Ended
(In thousands, except share data)	September 30,						September 30,						Three Months Ended March 31,
	2015			2014			2015			2014			2016			2015
Interest and Dividend Income
Loans, including fees	$	3,899		$	3,839		$	11,606		$	12,090		$	4,513		$	3,833
Investment securities - taxable		228			313			699			897			401			243
Investment securities - tax exempt		133			159			335			523			136			94
Federal funds sold		—			—			—			1			1			—
Interest-bearing deposits		9			9			27			29			15			9
Dividends		22			11			75			30			29			43

Total Interest Income		4,291			4,331			12,742			13,570
Total Interest and Dividend Income														5,095			4,222

Interest Expense
Deposits		419			432			1,294			1,400			466			439
Short-term borrowings		15			9			48			14			43			15
Long-term debt		29			63			134			194			56			55

Total Interest Expense		463			504			1,476			1,608			565			509

Net Interest Income		3,828			3,827			11,266			11,962			4,530			3,713
Provision for Loan Losses		—			126			450			126			99			—

Net Interest Income after Provision for Loan Losses		3,828			3,701			10,816			11,836			4,431			3,713

Noninterest Income
Service charges on deposit accounts		104			114			299			341			111			98
Other service charges and fees		140			188			430			679			165			137
Earnings on cash value of life insurance		42			71			167			172			82			51
Fees and commissions from securities brokerage		201			218			627			636			177			209
Gain/(loss) on sale of available for sale securities		11			135			(30	)		182
Loss on sale and valuation of other real estate owned		(25	)		(78	)		(92	)		(311	)
Gain/(loss) on other assets		1			—			(52	)		(2	)
Loss on sale of available for sale securities														(2	)		—
Gain (loss) on sale and valuation of other real estate owned														6			(26	)
Gain on sale of mortgage loans		111			64			305			213			78			78

Total Noninterest Income		585			712			1,654			1,910			617			547

Noninterest Expenses
Salaries and employee benefits		1,765			1,867			7,636			5,636			2,151			2,078
Occupancy expenses		633			335			1,648			1,032			381			436
Equipment expenses		161			155			487			461			172			161
Telecommunication and processing charges		314			309			917			857			347			293
Postage and office supplies		83			95			269			289			102			88
Loan prepayment penalty		—			—			238			—
FDIC premiums		81			93			236			276			120			68
Bank shares tax expense		86			56			258			216			105			85
Directors’ compensation		186			171			361			338			90			86
Professional services		67			109			357			243			93			168
Amortization of intangible assets		72			70			206			218			77			67
Other expenses		201			312			954			1,228			483			328

Total Noninterest Expenses		3,649			3,572			13,567			10,794			4,121			3,858

Income (Loss) before Income Taxes		764			841			(1,097	)		2,952
Applicable Federal Income Tax Expense (Benefit)		142			182			(749	)		741
Income before Income Taxes														927			402
Applicable Federal Income Tax Expense														174			28

Net Income (Loss)	$	622		$	659		($	348	)	$	2,211
Net Income													$	753		$	374

Basic Earnings (Loss) Per Share	$	0.23		$	0.25		($	0.13	)	$	0.82
Basic and Diluted Earnings Per Share													$	0.23		$	0.14

Diluted Earnings (Loss) Per Share	$	0.23		$	0.25		($	0.13	)	$	0.82
Dividends Per Share													$	0.14		$	0.14

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

Three ~~and Nine~~ Months Ended ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2016 and 2015 ~~and 2014~~

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

~~The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.~~

OnEffective November 1, 2013, Riverview ~~Financial Corporation~~ and Union Bancorp, Inc. (“Union”) consolidated to form a new Pennsylvania corporation under the name of Riverview Financial Corporation (the “Company”). ~~The Company and its wholly-owned bank subsidiary,~~ Riverview Bank (the “Bank”)~~, provide loan, deposit and a full range~~ is the wholly-owned subsidiary of banking services to individuals, businesses and municipalities through two full service offices in Marysville and Duncannon, Perry County, Pennsylvania, one full service office in Enola, Cumberland County, Pennsylvania, six full service offices in Tower City, Cressona, Pottsville and Orwigsburg, Schuylkill County, Pennsylvania, three full service and one drive-up office in Halifax, Millersburg and Elizabethville, Dauphin County, Pennsylvania and a full service branch office in Wyomissing, Berks County, Pennsylvania.the Company. Effective December 27, 2012, Riverview Bank purchased a wealth management company located in Orwigsburg, Schuylkill County, Pennsylvania that provides financial advisory, insurance, trust and investment services relating to non-deposit type investment products. The wealth management company is a division of the Bank. The Bank competes with several other financial institutions within its geographic footprint to provide its services to individuals, businesses, municipalities and other organizations.

~~The Company and~~31, 2015, The Citizens National Bank of Meyersdale PA (“Citizens”) ~~entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated October 30, 2014 (the “Merger Agreement”), pursuant to which Citizens will merge~~merged with and into Riverview Bank, with Riverview Bank ~~surviving (the “Merger”).~~surviving. The balance sheet as of December 31, 2015, includes the former Citizens’ ~~shareholders have approved~~assets and liabilities.

The Company’s financial results reflect the ~~Merger, subject to receipt~~consolidation of ~~approval~~Riverview and Union with and into Riverview Bank and the merger of Citizens with and into Riverview Bank under the purchase method of accounting, with the Company treated as the acquirer from an accounting standpoint. In the ~~Board of Governors~~case of the ~~Federal Reserve System (the “Federal Reserve”), which was received in October, 2015, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”)~~consolidation of Riverview and ~~the Pennsylvania Department of Banking and Securities (“DOB”). In July, 2015,~~Union, the Company ~~withdrew its previously filed merger applications~~was formed and treated as a recapitalization of Riverview, with ~~these bank regulators, but re-submitted the applications during September 2015. On October 20, 2015, the Federal Reserve gave its approval, followed by the FDIC’s approval, dated November 5, 2015,~~Riverview’s assets and ~~the DOB’s approval, dated November 9, 2015. Completion~~liabilities recorded at their historical values, and Union’s assets and liabilities recorded at their fair values as of the ~~merger is subject to customary closing conditions, and is expected to occur by year-end 2015.~~effective date of the consolidation.

The Bank is a Pennsylvania ~~state-chartered financial institution.~~state chartered bank. The Company and the Bank are subject to ~~regulations~~regulation by certain state and federal ~~agencies, including the DOB, Federal Reserve and FDIC.~~agencies. These regulatory agencies periodically examine the Company and the Bank for adherence to laws and ~~regulations as well as safety and soundness.~~regulations.

The accounting and reporting policies followed by the Company conform to generally accepted accounting principles and to general practices within the banking industry. The following paragraphs briefly describe the ~~Company’s most~~more significant accounting policies.

The Company’s unaudited consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly-owned ~~bank~~ subsidiary, the Bank and its operating ~~divisions.~~ divisions, Marysville Bank, Halifax Bank, Citizens Neighborhood Bank and Riverview Financial Wealth Management.All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. The Company uses the accrual basis of accounting.

The Company’s unaudited financial statements have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles for interim financial information and predominant practices within the banking industry, and are presented in accordance with instructions for Form 10-Q and Rule 10-01 of Securities and Exchange Commission Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by generally accepted accounting principles for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments considered necessary for a fair presentation are of a normal and recurring nature and have been included. Operating results for the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30, 2015~~March 31, 2016 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ended December 31, ~~2015~~2016 or any other future period.

The consolidated financial statements presented in this report should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and the accompanying notes for the year ended December 31, ~~2014,~~2015, included in the Company’s Form 10-K, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 30, ~~2015.~~

These consolidated financial statements have been prepared in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) and predominant practices within the banking industry. The preparation of these consolidated financial statements requires the Company to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities.

The Company evaluates estimates on an ongoing basis. Material estimates that are particularly susceptible to significant change in the near term relate to the determination of the allowance for loan losses, the potential impairment of goodwill, the valuation of deferred tax assets, the determination of other-than-temporary impairment on securities and the valuation of real estate acquired by foreclosure

or in satisfaction of loans. The determination of the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses is based on estimates that are particularly ~~susceptible to~~affected by significant changes in the economic environment and market conditions. In connection with the determination of the estimated losses on loans and foreclosed real estate, management obtains independent appraisals ~~for~~of the value of significant collateral.

While management uses available information to recognize losses on loans, further reductions in the carrying amounts of loans may be necessary based on changes in local economic conditions. In addition, regulatory agencies, as an integral part of their examination process, periodically review the estimated losses on loans. Such agencies may require the Bank to recognize additional losses based on their judgments about information available to them at the time of their examination. Because of these factors, it is reasonably possible that the estimated losses on loans may change materially in the near term. However, the amount of any such change ~~that is reasonably possible~~ cannot be estimated.

The accounting policies of the Company as applied in the interim consolidated financial statements presented, are substantially the same as those followed on an annual basis, as applied in the Company’s annual consolidated audited financial statements included in the Company’s Form 10-K. These consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto for Riverview Financial Corporation for the year ended December 31, ~~2014.~~2015. The results of interim periods presented are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2016.

The Company operates in a single business segment consisting of traditional banking activities.

Generally accepted accounting principles establish general standards for accounting for and disclosure of events that occur after the balance sheet date but before the financial statements are issued. In preparing these consolidated financial statements, the Company evaluated the events and transactions that occurred from the date of the financial statements through ~~November~~May 13, ~~2015,~~2016, the date this Form 10-Q was filed, and has not identified ~~the following event~~any events, that ~~requires~~require recognition or disclosure in the consolidated financial ~~statements:~~statements.

The Company and Citizens National Bank of Meyersdale (“Citizens”) entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated October 30, 2014 (the “Merger Agreement”), pursuant to which Citizens will merge with and into Riverview Bank, with Riverview Bank surviving (the “Merger”). In the Merger, each share of Citizens common stock that is outstanding, other than treasury stock, will be converted into either (1) $38.46 in cash or (2) 2.9586 shares of the Company’s common stock, at the election of each Citizens shareholder, subject to proration in order to ensure that no more than 20% of the outstanding Citizens shares are converted into cash consideration. Riverview Bank and Citizens will be combined in a statutory merger under the provisions of the Pennsylvania Banking Code, and Riverview Bank will survive as the resulting institution.

Citizens’ shareholders have approved the Merger, subject to receipt of approval from the Federal Reserve, the FDIC and the DOB. In July 2015, the Company withdrew its previously filed applications with the FDIC, DOB and the Federal Reserve seeking approval to merge with Citizens but re-filed those applications during September 2015. The Federal Reserve gave its approval on October 20, 2015, followed by the FDIC’s approval, dated November 5, 2015, and the DOB’s approval, dated November 9, 2015. Completion of the merger is subject to customary closing conditions, and is expected to occur by year-end 2015.

Basic earnings per share represent income available to common stockholders divided by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the period. For diluted earnings per share, net income is divided by the weighted average number of shares outstanding plus the incremental number of shares that would have been outstanding if dilutive potential common shares had been issued. The Company’s potential common stock equivalents consist of outstanding common stock options, for ~~322,200~~344,250 shares of Riverview common stock as of ~~September 30, 2015~~March 31, 2016 and ~~September 30, 2014.~~322,200 shares as of March 31, 2015.

The following table presents the computation of earnings per share for the ~~periods presented.~~three months ended March 31, 2016 and 2015.


									Income Numerator		Common Shares Denominator		EPS
									(In thousands, except share data)
2016:
Basic EPS									$	753		3,206,501	$	0.23
Dilutive effect of potential common stock options												15,504

Diluted EPS									$	753		3,222,005	$	0.23
	Nine Months ended September 30,
	Income Numerator			Common Shares Denominator		EPS
	(In thousands, except share data)								Income Numerator		Common Shares Denominator		EPS
2015:
Basic EPS	($	348	)		2,709,887	($	0.13	)	$	374		2,708,840	$	0.14
Dilutive effect of potential common stock options					8,855							50,632

Diluted EPS	($	348	)		2,718,742	($	0.13	)	$	374		2,759,472	$	0.14

2014:
Basic EPS	$	2,211			2,704,609	$	0.82
Dilutive effect of potential common stock options					7,615

Diluted EPS	$	2,211			2,712,224	$	0.82

Comprehensive income is divided into net income and other comprehensive income. The components of the Company’s accumulated other comprehensive income are unrealized gains and (losses) on securities available for sale and unrecognized gains and (losses) associated with the defined benefit postretirement plan. Changes to other comprehensive income are presented net of tax in the Statements of Comprehensive Income. Reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive income are recorded in the Consolidated Statements of Income.

The following tables illustrate the ~~disclosure of~~ changes in the balances of each component of accumulated other comprehensive income for the periods presented:


	Three Months Ended September 30,
	2015									2014								March 31, 2016
(In thousands)	Unrealized Gains and Losses on Available- for-Sale			Defined Benefit Pension Items			Total			Unrealized Gains and Losses on Available- for-Sale			Defined Benefit Pension Items		Total			Unrealized Gains and Losses on Available-for- Sale			Defined Benefit Pension Items			Total
Beginning balance	$	256		($	342	)	($	86	)	$	440		$	9	$	449		$	461		($	569	)	($	108	)

Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications		232			—			232			54			—		54			507			—			507
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income⁽¹⁾		(11	)		—			(11	)		(135	)		—		(135	)		2			—			2
Tax effect of current period changes⁽²⁾		(75	)		—			(75	)		28			—		28			(173	)		—			(173	)

Net current-period other comprehensive income (loss)		146			—			146			(53	)		—		(53	)		336			—			336

Ending balance	$	402		($	342	)	$	60		$	387		$	9	$	396		$	797		($	569	)	$	228

The following tables present the amortized cost and estimated fair values of investment securities at ~~September 30, 2015~~March 31, 2016 and December 31, ~~2014,~~2015, all of which were available-for-sale:


	Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized Gains		Gross Unrealized Losses		Fair Value		March 31, 2016
	(In thousands)								Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized Gains			Gross Unrealized Losses		Fair Value
September 30, 2015:
U.S Government agencies	$	776	$	31	$	—	$	807
										(In thousands)
U.S. Government agency securities									$	3,895	$	85		$	—	$	3,980
State and municipal		27,089		430		77		27,442		33,530		724			17		34,237
U.S. Government agencies and sponsored enterprises (GSEs) - residential:
U.S. Government agencies and sponsored enterprises (GSEs) – residential:
Mortgage-backed securities		18,551		157		7		18,701		24,565		252			1		24,816
Collateralized mortgage obligations (CMOs)		1,867		43		1		1,909		1,659		44			1		1,702
Corporate debt obligations		4,490		19		—		4,509		7,991		99			—		8,090
Equity securities, financial services		471		14		—		485		470		38			16		492

	$	53,244	$	694	$	85	$	53,853	$	72,110	$	1,242		$	35	$	73,317


	Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized Gains		Gross Unrealized Losses		Fair Value		December 31, 2015
	(In thousands)								Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized Gains			Gross Unrealized Losses		Fair Value
December 31, 2014:
U.S Government agencies	$	798	$	20	$	1	$	817
										(In thousands)
U.S. Treasuries									$	103	$	—		$	—	$	103
U.S. Government agency securities										4,708		29			—		4,737
State and municipal		23,296		474		62		23,708		34,197		587			14		34,770
U.S. Government agencies and sponsored enterprises (GSEs) - residential:
U.S. Government agencies and sponsored enterprises (GSEs) – residential:
Mortgage-backed securities		20,676		229		3		20,902		25,942		116			35		26,023
Collateralized mortgage obligations (CMOs)		2,364		28		1		2,391		1,741		35			3		1,773
Corporate debt obligations		489		16		—		505		7,989		17			62		7,945
Equity securities, financial services		471		24		—		495		471		31			2		499

	$	48,094	$	791	$	67	$	48,818	$	75,151	$	815	��	$	116	$	75,850

The amortized cost and fair value of debt securities available-for-sale at ~~September 30, 2015,~~March 31, 2016, by contractual maturity, are shown below. Expected maturities ~~may~~will differ from contractual maturities because issuers may have the right to prepay obligations with or without call or prepayment penalties:


	Amortized Cost		Fair Value		Amortized Cost		Fair Value
	(In thousands)					(In thousands)
Due in one year or less	$	—	$	—	$	232	$	235
Due after one year through five years		2,234		2,290		2,509		2,546
Due after five years through ten years		10,472		10,654		18,799		19,130
Due after ten years		19,649		19,814		23,876		24,396

		32,355		32,758		45,416		46,307

Mortgage-backed securities		18,551		18,701		24,565		24,816
CMOs		1,867		1,909		1,659		1,702
Equity securities		471		485		470		492

		20,889		21,095		26,694		27,010

	$	53,244	$	53,853	$	72,110	$	73,317

Securities with an amortized cost of ~~$48,696,000~~$50,128,000 and a fair value of ~~$49,305,000~~$51,127,000 were pledged at ~~September 30, 2015~~March 31, 2016 as collateral for public fund deposits and for other purposes as required or permitted by law. In comparison, at December 31, ~~2014,~~2015, securities with an ~~amortized cost of $47,084,000 and a fair value of $47,768,000 were pledged for the same purposes.~~

amortized cost of $52,384,000 and a fair value of $53,039,000 were pledged for the same purposes. Information ~~with respect~~pertaining to securities with gross unrealized losses at ~~September 30, 2015~~March 31, 2016 and December 31, ~~2014~~2015 aggregated by investment category and length of time that individual securities have been in a continuous loss position ~~are~~were as follows:


	Less Than 12 Months				More Than 12 Months				Total				Less Than 12 Months				More Than 12 Months				Total
	Fair Value		Unrealized Losses		Fair Value		Unrealized Losses		Fair Value		Unrealized Losses		Fair Value		Unrealized Losses		Fair Value		Unrealized Losses		Fair Value		Unrealized Losses
	(In thousands)													(In thousands)
September 30, 2015:
March 31, 2016:
Available-for-sale:
U.S. Government agency securities	$	—	$	—	$	23	$	—	$	23	$	—
State and municipal		6,623		59		650		18		7,273		77	$	1,030	$	7	$	654	$	10	$	1,684	$	17
Mortgage-backed securities		6,812		7		—		—		6,812		7		2,432		1		—		—		2,432		1
Collateralized mortgage obligations (CMOs)		444		1		—		—		444		1		712		1		—		—		712		1
Equity securities, financial services														179		16		—		—		179		16

	$	13,879	$	67	$	673	$	18	$	14,552	$	85	$	4,353	$	25	$	654	$	10	$	5,007	$	35

December 31, 2014:

													Less Than 12 Months				More Than 12 Months				Total
													Fair Value		Unrealized Losses		Fair Value		Unrealized Losses		Fair Value		Unrealized Losses
														(In thousands)
December 31, 2015:
Available-for-sale:
U.S. Government agency securities	$	49	$	1	$	—	$	—	$	49	$	1
State and municipal		2,034		5		3,455		57		5,489		62	$	—	$	—	$	652	$	14	$	652	$	14
Mortgage-backed securities		3,699		3		—		—		3,699		3		9,513		35		—		—		9,513		35
Collateralized mortgage obligations (CMOs)		423		1		100		—		523		1		725		3		—		—		725		3
Corporate debt obligations														3,937		62		—		—		3,937		62
Equity securities, financial services														164		2		—		—		164		2

	$	6,205	$	10	$	3,555	$	57	$	9,760	$	67	$	14,339	$	102	$	652	$	14	$	14,991	$	116

Management evaluates securities for other-than-temporary impairment on at least a quarterly basis. It is management’s intent to hold all investments until maturity unless market, economic, credit quality or specific investment concerns warrant a sale of securities. Consideration is given to (1) the length of time and the extent to which the fair value of securities has been less than cost, (2) the credit quality or financial condition and near-term prospects of the issuer, and (3) the intent and ability of the ~~corporation~~Company to retain its investment in the issuer for a period of time sufficient to allow for any anticipated recovery in fair value.

At ~~September 30, 2015, twenty-six~~March 31, 2016, fourteen securities ~~comprised of one U.S. Government agency, seventeen state and municipal securities, four mortgage-backed securities and four CMOs,~~ had unrealized losses as compared with a total of sixteen securities with unrealized losses at December 31, ~~2014.~~2015. Management believes the unrealized losses relate to changes in interest rates since the time the individual securities were purchased as opposed to underlying credit issues. AsBecause the Company does not intend to sell any of these debt securities, and it is more likely than not that the Company will not be required to sell any debt securities before the cost bases are recovered, no declines were deemed to be other-than-temporary.

During the three months ended March 31, 2016, one U.S Treasury note, twelve mortgage-backed securities and eight municipal bonds were sold, with no gains or losses from the sale. However, a loss of $2,000 was recorded during the three months ended March 31, 2016 due to one municipal bond that was called. There were no securities sold during the three months ~~and nine months~~ ended ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2015. However, a gain of $15,000 and a loss of $4,000, resulting in a net gain of $11,000 was recorded during the three months ended September 30, 2015 due to two municipal bonds that were called. For the nine months ended September 30, 2015, gains of $17,000 and losses of $47,000, resulting in a net loss of $30,000 were recorded due to several municipal bonds that were either fully or partially called. During the three months ended September 30, 2014, five municipal bonds totaling $3,688,000 were either sold, called or pre-refunded, resulting in a gross gain of $140,000, gross loss of $5,000, and a resulting net gain of $135,000. During the first nine months of 2014, the Bank sold one available-for-sale mortgage-backed security and seven municipal bonds totaling $4,423,000. In addition, there were five municipal bonds and one equity security, totaling $1,585,000, which were partially or entirely called or pre-refunded. For the nine months ended September 30, 2014, gross realized gains from the sales and the calls amounted to $224,000, while gross realized losses were $42,000, resulting in an $182,000 net gain on the sale.

Note 65 - Loans Receivable, Credit Quality for Loans and the Allowance for Loan Losses

The loan portfolio comprises the major component of ~~Riverview’s~~the Company’s earning assets and is the highest yielding asset category. Loans receivable are summarized as follows for the periods presented:


(Dollars in thousands)	September 30, 2015			December 31, 2014			March 31, 2016			December 31, 2015
Commercial	$	42,393		$	37,301		$	45,420		$	46,076
Commercial real estate		203,235			199,782			208,720			205,500
Commercial land and land development		15,791			11,441			9,527			18,599
Residential real estate		71,012			73,453			115,282			117,669
Home equity lines of credit		17,134			18,235			18,047			17,437
Consumer installment		2,743			2,481			4,486			4,564

Total loans		352,308			342,693		$	401,482		$	409,845
Allowance for loan losses		(3,994	)		(3,792	)		(3,717	)		(4,365	)

Total loans, net	$	348,314		$	338,901		$	397,765		$	405,480

The Bank takes a balanced approach to its lending activities, by managing risk associated with its loan ~~portfolio. This risk management is achieved~~portfolio by maintaining diversification within the portfolio, consistently applying prudent underwriting standards, ~~ensuring that~~engaging in ongoing monitoring efforts ~~are ongoing~~ with attention to portfolio dynamics and mix, and ~~following~~using procedures that are consistently applied and updated on an annual basis. The Bank ~~utilizes~~contracts with an independent third party each year to conduct a credit review of the loan portfolio to provide an independent assessment of asset quality through, among other things, an evaluation of how the Bank’s established underwriting criteria ~~used~~is applied in originating credits. Separately, every loan booked and every ~~rejected~~ loan application turned down undergoes an ~~audit~~internal review for conformity with established policies and compliance with ~~current regulatory~~ lending laws. The Bank has ~~not changed~~maintained its loan underwriting criteria, and management believes its standards ~~continue to remain~~are conservative. All of the Bank’s loans are to domestic borrowers.

The Bank’s management monitors the loan portfolio on a regular basis, ~~with consideration given to~~performing a detailed analysis of loans by portfolio segment. Portfolio segments represent pools of loans with similar risk characteristics. There are eight portfolio ~~segments:~~segments - commercial loans; non-owner occupied commercial real estate loans; owner occupied commercial real estate loans; one-to-four family investment property loans; commercial land/land development/construction loans; residential real estate loans; home equity lines of credit; and consumer loans. For the purpose of estimating the allowance for loan losses, purchased loan participations in the segments for commercial loans, non-owner occupied commercial real estate loans, owner occupied commercial real estate loans, one-to-four family investment property loans, and commercial land/land development/construction loans are also separately evaluated for loan participations bought and loans generated by the branches and commercial offices in Schuylkill and Berks Counties, which are new market areas adjacent to the Bank’s traditional geographic footprint.evaluated. In addition, the Company ~~undertakes separate evaluations for~~separately evaluates the acquired Union Bank ~~portfolio.~~and Citizens portfolios.

Internal policy requires that the Chief Credit Officer make a quarterly report to the Board of Directors ~~on a quarterly basis~~ to discuss the status of the loan portfolio and any related credit quality issues. These reports include, but are not limited to, information on past due and nonaccrual loans, impaired loans, the allowance for loan losses, changes in the allowance for loan losses, credit quality indicators and foreclosed assets.

Loans are considered to be past due when they are not paid in accordance with contractual terms. Past due loans are monitored by portfolio segment and by severity of delinquency: 30-59 days past due; 60-89 days past due; and 90 days and greater past due. The accrual of interest is discontinued when the contractual payment of principal or interest has become 90 days past due or management has serious doubts about further collectability of principal or interest, even though the loan is currently performing. A loan may remain on accrual status if it can be documented that it is well secured and in the process of collection. When a loan is placed on nonaccrual status, all unpaid interest credited to income in the current calendar year is reversed and all unpaid interest accrued in prior calendar years is charged against the allowance for loan losses. Interest payments received on nonaccrual loans are either applied against principal or reported as interest income according to management’s judgment as to the collectability of principal. Generally, loans are restored to accrual status when the obligation is brought current, has performed in accordance with contractual terms for a reasonable period of time and the ultimate collectability of the total contractual principal and interest is no longer in doubt.

Note 65 - Loans Receivable, Credit Quality for Loans and the Allowance for Loan Losses (continued)

The following table presents an aging of loans receivable by loan portfolio segments as of ~~September 30, 2015~~March 31, 2016 and December 31, ~~2014,~~2015, and includes nonaccrual loans and loans past due 90 days or more and still accruing:


	30-59 Days Past Due		60-89 Days Past Due		90 Days and Greater			Total Past Due		Current		Total		Recorded Investment Greater Than 90 Days & Accruing
December 31, 2014							��
(In thousands)																30-59 Days Past Due		60-89 Days Past Due		90 Days and Greater		Total Past Due		Current		Total		Recorded Investment Greater Than 90 Days & Accruing
March 31, 2016:
Commercial	$	24	$	41	$	364		$	429	$	36,872	$	37,301	$	—	$	174	$	—	$	293	$	467	$	44,953	$	45,420	$	34
Commercial real estate:
Non-owner occupied		15		5,426		162			5,603		97,823		103,426		—		144		2,134		—		2,278		105,463		107,741		—
Owner occupied		621		—		758			1,379		70,178		71,557		294		276		102		282		660		74,974		75,634		—
1-4 family investment		—		515		446			961		23,838		24,799		132		130		—		318		448		24,897		25,345		—
Commercial land and land development		16		—		215			231		11,210		11,441		—		—		—		—		—		9,527		9,527		—
Residential real estate		739		425		1,805			2,969		70,484		73,453		214		3,221		215		396		3,832		111,450		115,282		165
Home equity lines of credit		103		59		436			598		17,637		18,235		—		419		—		36		455		17,592		18,047		—
Consumer		6		5		3			14		2,467		2,481		3		3		—		—		3		4,483		4,486		—

Total	$	1,524	$	6,471	$	4,189		$	12,184	$	330,509	$	342,693	$	643	$	4,367	$	2,451	$	1,325	$	8,143	$	393,339	$	401,482	$	199


																30-59 Days Past Due		60-89 Days Past Due		90 Days and Greater		Total Past Due		Current		Total		Recorded Investment Greater Than 90 Days & Accruing
December 31, 2015
Commercial																$	34	$	—	$	1,007	$	1,041	$	45,035	$	46,076	$	—
Commercial real estate:
Non-owner occupied																	—		—		24		24		110,431		110,455		—
Owner occupied																	172		447		270		889		68,758		69,647		—
1-4 family investment																	131		—		265		396		25,002		25,398		—
Commercial land and land development																	—		250		—		250		18,349		18,599		—
Residential real estate																	1,163		1,025		595		2,783		114,886		117,669		89
Home equity lines of credit																	46		412		36		494		16,943		17,437		—
Consumer																	10		—		1		11		4,553		4,564		—

Total																$	1,556	$	2,134	$	2,198	$	5,888	$	403,957	$	409,845	$	89

Loan balances presented above include net deferred loan fees of ~~$722,000~~$821,000 and ~~$716,000~~$764,000 at ~~September 30, 2015~~March 31, 2016 and December 31, ~~2014,~~2015, respectively.

Included within the loan portfolio are loans infor which the Bank discontinued the accrual of interest due to the deterioration in the financial condition of the borrower. Such loans approximated ~~$3,744,000~~$1,949,000 and ~~$4,245,000~~$3,182,000 at ~~September 30, 2015~~March 31, 2016 and December 31, ~~2014,~~2015, respectively. If the nonaccrual loans had performed in accordance with their original terms, interest income would have increased by ~~$50,000~~$47,000 and $43,000 for the three months ended ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2016 and March 31, 2015, and $138,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2015. These amounts compare to an increase in interest income of $101,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2014 and $256,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2014.respectively.

Note 65 - Loans Receivable, Credit Quality for Loans and the Allowance for Loan Losses (continued)

The following table presents loans by loan portfolio segments that were on a nonaccrual status as of ~~September 30, 2015~~March 31, 2016 and December 31, ~~2014:~~2015:


(In thousands)	September 30, 2015		December 31, 2014		March 31, 2016		December 31, 2015
Commercial	$	1,547	$	515	$	394	$	1,143
Commercial real estate:
Non-owner occupied		23		162		—		24
Owner occupied		1,093		701		496		766
1-4 family investment		329		384		318		328
Commercial land and land development		—		215		—		—
Residential real estate		716		1,735		705		885
Home equity lines of credit		36		533		36		36

Total	$	3,744	$	4,245	$	1,949	$	3,182

A loan is considered impaired when, based on current information and events, it is probable that the Bank will be unable to collect the scheduled payments of principal or interest when due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. Factors considered by management in determining impairment include payment status, collateral value, and the probability of collecting scheduled principal and interest payments when due. Loans that experience insignificant payment delays and payment shortfalls generally are not classified as impaired. Management determines the significance of payment delays and payment shortfalls on a case-by-case basis, taking into consideration all of the circumstances surrounding the loan and the borrower, including the length of the delay, the reasons for the delay, the borrower’s prior payment record, and the amount of the shortfall in relation to the principal and interest owed. The Bank further identifies all loans in nonaccrual status and troubled debt restructured loans as impaired loans, except for large groups of smaller balance homogeneous loans that are collectively evaluated for impairment. Accordingly, the Bank does not separately identify individual consumer and residential loans for impairment disclosures, unless the loans are the subject of a restructuring agreement. Impairment is measured on a ~~loan by loan~~loan-by-loan basis for commercial and construction loans by either the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate, or the loan’s obtainable market price, or the fair value of the collateral if the loan is collateral dependent. When the measure of an impaired loan results in a realizable value that is less than the recorded investment in the loan, the difference is recorded as a specific valuation allowance against that loan, and the Bank then makes the appropriate adjustment to the allowance for loan losses.

Note 65 - Loans Receivable, Credit Quality for Loans and the Allowance for Loan Losses (continued)

The following ~~table~~ presents impaired loans by loan portfolio segments for the periods presented:


	September 30, 2015						Three Months Ended September 30, 2015				Nine Months Ended September 30, 2015				March 31, 2016										March 31, 2015
(In thousands)	Recorded Investment in Impaired Loans		Unpaid Principal Balance of Impaired Loans		Related Allowance		Average Recorded Investment in Impaired Loans		Interest Income Recognized		Average Recorded Investment in Impaired Loans		Interest Income Recognized		Recorded Investment in Impaired Loans		Unpaid Principal Balance of Impaired Loans		Related Allowance		Average Recorded Investment in Impaired Loans		Interest Income Recognized		Average Recorded Investment in Impaired Loans		Interest Income Recognized
Loans with no related allowance recorded:
Commercial	$	1,011	$	1,011	$	—	$	1,014	$	22	$	1,023	$	22	$	898	$	2,021	$	—	$	1,395	$	7	$	1,183	$	7
Commercial real estate:
Non-owner occupied		2,193		2,193		—		2,183		23		2,183		62		2,156		2,156		—		2,163		19		2,203		19
Owner occupied		1,716		1,716		—		1,725		23		1,215		69		975		975		—		978		19		914		15
1-4 family investment		670		670		—		675		2		681		13		866		873		—		875		7		819		5
Commercial land and land development																—		—		—		—		—		218		—
Residential real estate		2,197		2,197		—		2,345		30		2,414		116		2,383		2,520		—		2,574		31		2,343		19
Home equity lines of credit		400		400		—		443		3		446		19		398		398		—		441		3		416		—

	$	8,187	$	8,187	$	—	$	8,385	$	103	$	7,962	$	301	$	7,676	$	8,943	$	—	$	8,426	$	86	$	8,096	$	65

Loans with an allowance recorded:
Commercial	$	1,193	$	1,193	$	120	$	1,193	$	—	$	530	$	27	$	135	$	135	$	1	$	136	$	—	$	—	$	—
Commercial real estate:
Owner occupied																214		214		1		214		—		—		—
1-4 family investment		186		186		7		188		—		191		—		187		187		6		186		—		192		—
Residential real estate		122		122		6		122		2		123		4		120		120		33		121		1		124		1

	$	1,501	$	1,501	$	133	$	1,503	$	2	$	844	$	31	$	656	$	656	$	41	$	657	$	1	$	316	$	1

Total
Commercial	$	2,204	$	2,204	$	120	$	2,207	$	22	$	1,553	$	49	$	1,033	$	2,156	$	1	$	1,531	$	7	$	1,183	$	7
Commercial real estate:
Non-owner occupied		2,193		2,193		—		2,183		23		2,183		62		2,156		2,156		—		2,163		19		2,203		19
Owner occupied		1,716		1,716		—		1,725		23		1,215		69		1,189		1,189		1		1,192		19		914		15
1-4 family investment		856		856		7		863		2		872		13		1,053		1,060		6		1,061		7		1,011		5
Commercial land and land development																—		—		—		—		—		218		—
Residential real estate		2,319		2,319		6		2,467		32		2,537		120		2,503		2,640		33		2,695		32		2,467		20
Home equity lines of credit		400		400		—		443		3		446		19		398		398		—		441		3		416		—

	$	9,688	$	9,688	$	133	$	9,888	$	105	$	8,806	$	332	$	8,332	$	9,599	$	41	$	9,083	$	87	$	8,412	$	66

Note 65 - Loans Receivable, Credit Quality for Loans and the Allowance for Loan Losses (continued)

The recorded investment in impaired loans ~~increased~~decreased by ~~$1,280,000~~$1,216,000 at ~~September 30, 2015~~March 31, 2016 as compared to December 31, ~~2014.~~2015. This ~~increase~~decrease resulted primarily from the ~~addition~~charge-off of ~~three residential loans, which became impaired~~one large commercial loan in the ~~first quarter,~~amount of $722,000, and the ~~addition~~transfer of one commercial ~~loan and three owner-occupied commercial~~ real estate ~~loans, which became impaired~~loan in the ~~second quarter. These levels were partially~~amount of $270,000 to other real estate owned, offset by payments and payoffs received on impaired ~~loans along with the transfer of six impaired loans to other real estate owned during the first nine months of 2015.~~loans.

Impaired loans also include all loans modified and identified as troubled debt restructurings (“TDRs”). A loan is deemed to be a TDR when the Bank agrees to a modification to the terms of a loan resulting in a concession made by the Bank in an effort to mitigate potential loss arising from a borrower’s financial difficulty. As of ~~September 30, 2015,~~March 31, 2016, there were ~~twenty five~~thirty-two restructured loans, totaling ~~$6,842,000,~~$6,998,000, involving ~~nineteen~~twenty-six separate and unrelated borrowers who were experiencing financial difficulty. The modifications to these loans included reductions in interest rates, extension of maturity dates, lengthening of amortization schedules and provisions for interest only payments. There are no commitments to extend additional funds to any of these borrowers. At December 31, ~~2014,~~2015, there were ~~twenty-two~~thirty-two restructured loans, totaling ~~$6,596,000,~~$7,083,000, each involving ~~fifteen~~ separate and unrelated ~~borrowers.~~borrowers who were experiencing financial difficulty.

Note 65 - Loans Receivable, Credit Quality for Loans and the Allowance for Loan Losses (continued)

The following ~~tables present~~table presents the number of loans and recorded investment in loans restructured and identified as TDRs for the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2015. There were no troubled debt restructurings at March 31, 2016 and none of the loans classified as TDRs at March 31, 2015 ~~and 2014, as well as the number and recorded investment in these loans that~~ subsequently ~~defaulted.~~went into default. Defaulted loans are those for which payment is 30 days or more past due under the modified terms.

~~There were no new troubled debt restructurings during the three or nine months ended September 30, 2014.~~

The allowance for loan losses is composed of individual valuation allowances deemed necessary to absorb probable and quantifiable losses based upon current knowledge of the loan portfolio, and loan pool valuation allowances, allocated and unallocated, deemed necessary to absorb losses which are not specifically identified but are inherent in the portfolio. Management evaluates the adequacy of the allowance on a quarterly basis. If the allowance for loan losses is not sufficient to cover actual loan losses, provisions for loan losses may be recorded and, as a result, the Bank’s earnings may be reduced.

Individual valuation allowances are established in connection with specific loan reviews and the asset classification process, including the procedures for impairment testing. Such a valuation, which includes a review of loans for which full collectability in accordance with contractual terms is not reasonably assured, considers the estimated fair value of the underlying collateral less the costs to sell, or the present value of expected future cash flows, or the loan’s observable market value. Any shortfall that exists from this analysis results in a specific allowance for the loan. Pursuant to policy, loan losses must be ~~charged off~~recognized in the period the loans, or portions thereof, are deemed uncollectible. Assumptions and judgments by management in conjunction with outside sources are used to determine whether full collectability of a loan is ~~not~~ reasonably ~~assured.~~assured or not. These assumptions and judgments are also used to determine the estimates of the fair value of the underlying collateral or the present value of expected future cash flows or the loan’s observable market value. Individual valuation allowances could differ materially as a result of changes in these assumptions and judgments.

Individual loan analyses are performed quarterly on specific loans considered to be impaired. The results of the individual valuation allowances are aggregated and included in the overall allowance for loan losses.

Loan pool valuation allowances represent loss allowances that have been established to recognize the inherent risks associated with the Bank’s lending activity, but which, unlike individual allowances, have been allocated to unimpaired loans within the following eight portfolio segments: commercial loans; non-owner occupied commercial real estate loans; owner occupied commercial real estate loans; one-to-four family investment property loans; commercial land/land development/construction loans; residential real estate loans; home equity lines of credit; and consumer loans. ~~Each~~Loan participations purchased in each of the segments for commercial loans, non-owner occupied commercial real estate loans, owner occupied commercial real estate loans, one-to-four family investment property loans, and commercial land/land development/ construction loans are also separately evaluated for loan participations bought, and for loans generated by the branches and commercial offices in Schuylkill and Berks counties, which are newer market areas adjacent to the Bank’s original geographic footprint.evaluated. In addition, ~~there are~~ separate evaluations are made for the acquired Union Bank and Citizens loan ~~portfolio.~~

~~Note 6 - Loans Receivable, Credit Quality for Loans and the Allowance for Loan Losses (continued)~~

The Bank measures estimated credit losses in each of these groups of loans based, in part, on the historical loss rate of each group. The historical loss rate is calculated based on the average annualized net charge-offs over the most recent eight calendar quarters. ~~In the case of the acquired Union Bank loan portfolio, the historical loss rate is calculated based on the average annualized net charge-offs over the eight calendar quarters since the acquisition.~~

Loss factors are ~~assigned~~ascribed to loan segments based on the relative risk in each segment as indicated by historical loss ratios, the level of criticized/classified assets, and the nature of each segment in terms of collateral and inherent risk of the loan type. Management believes that historical losses or even recent trends in losses do not, by themselves, form a sufficient basis to determine the appropriate level for the allowance. Management therefore also considers the following qualitative factors that are likely to cause estimated credit losses associated with each of the portfolio segments to differ from historical loss experience:

Note 5 - Loans Receivable, Credit Quality for Loans and the Allowance for Loan Losses (continued)

Each portfolio segment is examined quarterly with regard to the impact of each of these factors on the quality and risk profile of the pool, and adjustments ranging from zero to fifty basis points per factor are calculated. The sum of these qualitative factor adjustments are added to the historical loss ratio for each segment, and the resulting percentage is applied to the loan balance of the segment to arrive at the required loan pool valuation allowance. An unallocated valuation allowance estimate is also made. Management determines the unallocated portion, which represents the difference between the reported allowance for loan losses and the calculated allowance for loan losses, based generally on the following criteria:

The loan pool valuation allowance for each segment, along with the unallocated valuation allowance, is totaled and added to the individual valuation allowance for impaired loans to arrive at the total allowance for loan losses.

These evaluations are inherently subjective because, even though they are based on objective data, it is management’s interpretation of the data that determines the amount of the appropriate allowance. If the evaluations prove to be incorrect, the allowance for loan losses may not be sufficient to cover losses inherent in the loan portfolio, resulting in additions to the allowance for loan losses and a reduction in the Bank’s earnings.

Charge offs of commercial and industrial loans and commercial real estate and construction loans are recorded promptly upon determination that all or a portion of any loan balance is uncollectible. A loan is considered uncollectible when the borrower is 90 days or more delinquent in principal or interest repayment and the following conditions exist:

All unsecured consumer loans are charged-off when they become 120 days delinquent or when it is determined that the debt is uncollectible. Overdrafts are charged off when it is determined that recovery is not likely, or the overdraft becomes 45 days old, whichever comes first.

~~Note 6 - Loans Receivable, Credit Quality for Loans and the Allowance for Loan Losses (continued)~~

All secured consumer loans, except those secured by a primary or secondary residence, are charged off when they become 120 days delinquent, or when it is determined that the debt is ~~uncollectible~~uncollectible.

Uncollateralized portions of residential real estate loans and consumer loans secured by real estate are charged off no later than when they are 180 days past due. Current appraisals are obtained to determine the appropriate carrying balance with any exposed portion of the loan principal balance being charged off.

Note 5 - Loans Receivable, Credit Quality for Loans and the Allowance for Loan Losses (continued)

The allowance for loan losses is presented by loan portfolio segments with the outstanding balances of loans for the periods presented:


				Commercial Real Estate																									Commercial Real Estate
(In thousands)	Commercial			Non-Owner Occupied		Owner Occupied			1-4 Family Investment			Commercial – Land and Land Development		Residential Real Estate		Home Equity Lines of Credit			Consumer		Unallocated		Total			Commercial			Non-Owner Occupied			Owner Occupied			1-4 Family Investment			Commercial – Land and Land Development			Residential Real Estate			Home Equity Lines of Credit		Consumer		Unallocated			Total
Allowance for Loan Losses for the Three Months Ended September 30, 2015:
Allowance for Loan Losses as of March 31, 2016:																									Allowance for Loan Losses as of March 31, 2016:
Beginning balance	$	640		$	1,291	$	719		$	398		$	116	$	680	$	116		$	22	$	163	$	4,145		$	1,298		$	1,372		$	552		$	303		$	202		$	520		$	93	$	25	$	—		$	4,365
Charge-offs		—			131		—			7			—		—		24			10		—		172			723			24			—			—			—			—			—		11		—			758
Recoveries		—			—		19			—			—		—		—			2		—		21			9			—			—			—			—			1			—		1		—			11
Provision		(182	)		220		(18	)		(74	)		43		3		(8	)		12		4		—			(18	)		(28	)		69			(33	)		(109	)		129			11		15		63			99

Ending balance	$	458		$	1,380	$	720		$	317		$	159	$	683	$	84		$	26	$	167	$	3,994		$	566		$	1,320		$	621		$	270		$	93		$	650		$	104	$	30	$	63		$	3,717

Ending balance: individually evaluated for impairment	$	120		$	—	$	—		$	7		$	—	$	6	$	—		$	—	$	—	$	133		$	1		$	—		$	1		$	6		$	—		$	33		$	—	$	—	$	—		$	41

Ending balance: collectively evaluated for impairment	$	338		$	1,380	$	720		$	310		$	159	$	677	$	84		$	26	$	167	$	3,861		$	565		$	1,320		$	620		$	264		$	93		$	617		$	104	$	30	$	63		$	3,676

Loans as of March 31, 2016:																									Loans as of March 31, 2016:
Ending balance																										$	45,420		$	107,741		$	75,634		$	25,345		$	9,527		$	115,282		$	18,047	$	4,486				$	401,482

Ending balance: individually evaluated for impairment																										$	1,033		$	2,156		$	1,189		$	1,053		$	—		$	2,503		$	398	$	—				$	8,332

Ending balance: collectively evaluated for impairment																										$	44,387		$	105,585		$	74,445		$	24,292		$	9,527		$	112,779		$	17,649	$	4,486				$	393,150

Allowance for Loan Losses as of December 31, 2015:
Beginning balance																										$	330		$	1,380		$	713		$	369		$	115		$	701		$	104	$	15	$	65		$	3,792
Charge-offs																											650			130			39			18			—			26			34		35		—			932
Recoveries																											8			—			19			—			—			—			—		6		—			33
Provision																											1,610			122			(141	)		(48	)		87			(155	)		23		39		(65	)		1,472

Ending balance																										$	1,298		$	1,372		$	552		$	303		$	202		$	520		$	93	$	25	$	—		$	4,365

Ending balance: individually evaluated for impairment																										$	700		$	1		$	—		$	7		$	—		$	7		$	—	$	—				$	715

Ending balance: collectively evaluated for impairment																										$	598		$	1,371		$	552		$	296		$	202		$	513		$	93	$	25				$	3,650

Loans as of December 31, 2015:
Ending balance																										$	46,076		$	110,455		$	69,647		$	25,398		$	18,599		$	117,669		$	17,437	$	4,564				$	409,845

Ending balance: individually evaluated for impairment																										$	1,787		$	2,187		$	1,462		$	1,065		$	—		$	2,647		$	400	$	—				$	9,548

Ending balance: collectively evaluated for impairment																										$	44,289		$	108,268		$	68,185		$	24,333		$	18,599		$	115,022		$	17,037	$	4,564				$	400,297

Allowance for Loan Losses as of March 31, 2015:
Beginning balance																										$	330		$	1,380		$	713		$	369		$	115		$	701		$	104	$	15	$	65		$	3,792
Charge-offs																											—			—			39			—			—			15			—		6		—			60
Recoveries																											—			—			—			—			—			0			—		3		—			3
Provision																											33			(83	)		57			26			(2	)		(14	)		3		7		(27	)		—

Ending balance																										$	363		$	1,297		$	731		$	395		$	113		$	672		$	107	$	19	$	38		$	3,735

Note 65 - Loans Receivable, Credit Quality for Loans and the Allowance for Loan Losses (continued)

~~Note 6 - Loans Receivable, Credit Quality for Loans and the Allowance for Loan Losses (continued)~~

The Bank has established a credit risk rating system to quantify the risk in the Bank’s loan portfolio. This system is a critical tool for managing the Bank’s lending activities and for evaluating appropriate loan loss reserves. This rating system is dynamic, and risk ratings are subject to change at any time when circumstances warrant. The system rates the strength of the borrower and is designed to be a tool for management to manage the Bank’s credit risk and provide an early warning system for negative migration of credits. The system also provides for recognition of improvement in credits. Risk ratings move dynamically, both negatively and positively.

Each new, renewed or modified credit facility is given a risk rating that takes into consideration factors that affect credit quality. The primary determinants of the risk rating assigned are based upon the reliability of the primary source of repayment and the past, present, and projected financial condition of the borrower. The rating also reflects current economic and industry conditions. Major factors used in determining the rating include the following variables:

~~Note 6 - Loans Receivable, Credit Quality for Loans and the Allowance for Loan Losses (continued)~~

In addition, the following factors may affect the risk rating derived from the above factors:

Collateral: The rating may be affected by the type and quality of collateral, the level of coverage, the economic life of the collateral, liquidation value, and the Bank’s ability to dispose of the collateral.

Guarantors: Guarantees can differ substantially in enhancing the risk rating assigned to a loan or lending commitment. In order to provide enough support to impact the assigned rating by one or more levels, the guarantee must be unconditional and must be from an individual or entity with substantial financial strength and a vested interest in the success of the borrower.

The Bank assigns risk ratings based on a scale from 1 to 8 with 1 being the highest quality rating and 8 being the lowest quality grade.

This category is reserved for loans that contain a virtual absence of any credit risk. The loan is secured by properly margined cash collateral (in accordance with loan policy). Loans that are ~~unquestionably~~fully guaranteed by the U.S. government, or any agency thereof, would also fit this category.

Loans in this category would be characterized by nominal risk and strong repayment certainty. This category includes loans to companies or individuals that are paying as agreed and that are either unsecured or secured where reliance is placed on non-liquid or less than good quality liquid collateral.

Loans in this category are considered to exhibit an average level of credit risk. However, these loans have certain risk characteristics, whether due to management, industry, economic or financial concerns. Credits with satisfactory liquidity and leverage, with losses considered to be of a temporary nature for which there is only minor concern, are included in this category. Loans for start-up businesses or loans to firms exhibiting high leverage may receive this rating. Loans in this category also include borrowers whose underlying financial strength may be relatively weak. However, risk of loss of loans in this category is considered minimal due to adequate, well-margined and controlled collateral.

Note 5 - Loans Receivable, Credit Quality for Loans and the Allowance for Loan Losses (continued)

Loans in this category typically are experiencing some negative trends due to financial, operational, economic, or regulatory reasons. A deteriorating collateral position or guarantor, in isolation, may also justify this rating. Such loans must have elevated monitoring as a result of negative trends which, if not addressed, could result in an unacceptable increase in credit risk.

A special mention loan has potential weaknesses that deserve management’s close attention. If left uncorrected, these potential weaknesses may result in a deterioration of the repayment prospects for the loan or in the Bank’s credit position at some future date. Special mention loans are not adversely classified and do not expose the Bank to sufficient risk to warrant an adverse classification. Loans for which economic or market conditions are beginning to adversely affect the borrower may be so rated. An adverse trend in the borrower’s operations or an imbalanced position in the balance sheet which has not reached a point where the liquidation is jeopardized may be best handled by this rating. Loans in which actual weaknesses are evident and significant are considered for more serious criticism. In cases where the credit is weak but trends are improving, and/or collateral support is within normal advance margins, consideration is given for the next higher rating.

A substandard loan is inadequately protected by the current sound worth and paying capacity of the borrower or by the collateral pledged, if any. Loans so classified must have a well-defined weakness or weaknesses that jeopardize the liquidation of the debt. These loans, even if apparently protected by collateral value, have well-defined weaknesses related

~~Note 6 - Loans Receivable, Credit Quality for Loans and the Allowance for Loan Losses (continued)~~

to adverse financial, managerial, economic, market, or political conditions which have clearly jeopardized repayment of principal and interest as originally intended. These loans are characterized by the distinct possibility that the Bank will sustain some loss if the deficiencies are not corrected. ~~All loans in~~Loans rated below this category are placed on nonaccrual ~~status may be rated no higher than substandard.~~status.

A doubtful loan has all of the weaknesses inherent in a loan classified as substandard with the added characteristic that the weaknesses make collection or liquidation in full, on the basis of current facts, conditions, and values, highly questionable and improbable. The possibility of loss is extremely high, but because of certain important and reasonably specific pending events that may work to strengthen the asset, its classification as a loss is deferred until its most exact status may be determined. Generally, pending events should be resolved within a relatively short period and the rating will be adjusted based on the new information. Because of high probability of loss, loans rated doubtful ~~must be~~are placed in non-accrual status.

Loans classified loss are considered uncollectible and of such little value that their continuance as a bankable asset is not warranted. This classification does not mean that the asset has absolutely no recovery or salvage value, but rather it is not practical or desirable to defer writing off this basically worthless asset even though a partial recovery may be effected in the future. When access to collateral, rather than the value of the collateral, is a problem, a less severe classification may be appropriate. However, the Bank will not maintain an asset on the balance sheet if realizing its value would require long-term litigation or other lengthy recovery efforts. Losses are recorded in the period the asset becomes uncollectible.

The following table presents the credit quality indicators and total credit exposure for each segment in the loan portfolio by internally assigned grades as of ~~September 30, 2015~~March 31, 2016 and December 31, ~~2014:~~2015:


			Commercial Real Estate																		Commercial Real Estate
(In thousands)	Commercial		Non- Owner Occupied		Owner Occupied		1-4 Family Investment		Commercial – Land and Land Development		Residential Real Estate		Home Equity Lines of Credit		Consumer		Total		Commercial		Non- Owner Occupied		Owner Occupied		1-4 Family Investment		Commercial – Land and Land Development		Residential Real Estate		Home Equity Lines of Credit		Consumer		Total
December 31, 2014:
March 31, 2016
1 – Excellent	$	275	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	161	$	436	$	245	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	106	$	351
2 – Good		3,975		169		1,682		46		183		—		—		—		6,055		2,663		88		1,144		30		163		—		—		—		4,088
3 – Satisfactory		30,593		93,180		61,916		18,445		10,671		68,288		16,894		2,320		302,307		39,485		96,542		68,542		17,749		8,905		111,570		17,285		4,380		364,458
4 – Watch		722		4,697		5,743		3,704		154		1,728		489		—		17,237		1,120		5,449		2,909		5,450		209		401		336		—		15,874
5 – Special Mention		145		3,031		1,031		1,741		218		124		319		—		6,609		434		2,260		1,498		1,261		—		165		28		—		5,646
6 – Substandard		1,591		2,349		1,185		863		215		3,313		533		—		10,049		1,473		3,402		1,541		855		250		3,146		398		—		11,065
7 – Doubtful		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—
8 – Loss		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—

Total	$	37,301	$	103,426	$	71,557	$	24,799	$	11,441	$	73,453	$	18,235	$	2,481	$	342,693	$	45,420	$	107,741	$	75,634	$	25,345	$	9,527	$	115,282	$	18,047	$	4,486	$	401,482

Note 65 - Loans Receivable, Credit Quality for Loans and the Allowance for Loan Losses (continued)

The adequacy of the allowance is analyzed quarterly, and adjusted to the level deemed appropriate by ~~credit administration~~ management, based upon its risk assessment of the entire portfolio. Based upon credit administration’s review of the classified loans and the overall allowance levels as they relate to the entire loan portfolio at ~~September 30, 2015,~~March 31, 2016, management believes the allowance for loan losses has been established at a level sufficient to cover the probable incurred losses in the loan portfolio.

Purchased loans are initially recorded at their acquisition date fair values. The carryover of the allowance for loan losses is prohibited as any credit losses in the loans are included in the determination of the fair value of the loans at the acquisition date. Fair values for purchased loans are based on a cash flow methodology that involves assumptions and judgments as to credit risk, default rates, loss severity, collateral values, discount rates, payment speeds, and prepayment risk.

As part of its acquisition due diligence process, the Bank ~~reviewed~~reviews the acquired institution’s loan grading system and the associated risk rating for loans. In performing this review, the Bank ~~considered~~considers cash flows, debt service coverage, delinquency status, accrual status, and collateral for the loan. This process ~~allowed Riverview~~allows the Bank to clearly identify the population of acquired loans that had evidence of deterioration in credit quality since origination and for which it was probable, at acquisition, that the Bank would be unable to collect all contractually required payments. All such loans identified by the Bank ~~were~~are considered to be within the scope of ASC 310-30, Loan and Debt Securities Acquired with Deteriorated Credit Quality and are identified as “Purchased Credit Impaired Loans”.

As a result of the merger with Citizens, effective December 31, 2015, the Bank identified ten purchased credit impaired (“PCI”) loans. As part of the consolidation with Union, effective November 1, 2013, the Bank identified fourteen purchased credit impaired (“PCI”) loans. For all PCI loans, the excess of cash flows expected at acquisition over the estimated fair value is referred to as the accretable discount and is recognized asinto interest income over the remaining life of the loan. The difference between contractually required payments at acquisition and the cash flows expected to be collected at acquisition is referred to as the non-accretable discount. The non-accretable discount represents estimated future credit losses expected to be incurred over the life of the loan. Subsequent decreases to the expected cash flows require the Bank to evaluate the need for an allowance for loan losses on these loans. Subsequent improvements in expected cash flows result in the reversal of a corresponding amount of the non-accretable discount which the Bank then reclassifies as an accretable discount that is recognized asinto interest income over the remaining life of the loan. The Bank’s evaluation of the amount of future cash flows that it expects to collect is based on a cash flow methodology that involves assumptions and judgments as to credit risk, collateral values, discount rates, payment speeds, and prepayment risk. Charge-offs of the principal amount on purchased impaired loans isare first applied to the non-accretable discount.

As a result of this accounting methodology, certain credit-related ratios of the Bank, including, for example, the growth rate in non-performing assets, may not necessarily be directly comparable with periods prior to the acquisition of the PCI loans.

For purchased loans that are not deemed impaired at acquisition, credit discounts representing principal losses expected over the life of the loans are a component of the initial fair value, and the discount is accreted to interest income over the life of the asset. Subsequent to the purchase date, the method used to evaluate the sufficiency of the credit discount is similar to originated loans, and if necessary, additional reserves are recognized in the allowance for loan losses.

Note 5 - Loans Receivable, Credit Quality for Loans and the Allowance for Loan Losses (continued)

The following is a summary of the loans ~~purchased~~acquired in the Union transaction as of November 1, 2013, the date of the consolidation:


										Purchased Credit Impaired Loans			Purchased Non- Impaired Loans			Total Purchased Loans
	Purchased Credit Impaired Loans			Purchased Non- Impaired Loans			Total Purchased Loans			(In thousands)
Union	(In thousands)
Contractually required principal and interest at acquisition	$	10,290		$	92,704		$	102,994		$	10,290		$	92,704		$	102,994
Contractual cash flows not expected to be collected		(5,487	)		(9,492	)		(14,979	)		(5,487	)		(9,492	)		(14,979	)

Expected cash flows at acquisition		4,803			83,212			88,015			4,803			83,212			88,015
Interest component of expected cash flows		(386	)		(12,278	)		(12,664	)		(386	)		(12,278	)		(12,664	)

Basis in acquired loans at acquisition – estimated fair value	$	4,417		$	70,934		$	75,351		$	4,417		$	70,934		$	75,351

The unpaid principal balances and the related carrying amount of Union acquired loans as of March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015 were as follows:

The changes in the accretable discount related to the Union purchased credit impaired loans were as follows:

The following is a summary of the loans acquired in the Citizens’ merger as of December 31, 2015, the effective date of the merger:

Note 65 - Loans Receivable, Credit Quality for Loans and the Allowance for Loan Losses (continued)

The unpaid principal balances and the related carrying ~~amounts~~amount of Citizens acquired loans as of ~~September 30, 2015~~March 31, 2016 and December 31, ~~2014~~2015 were as follows:


	September 30, 2015		December 31, 2014		March 31, 2016		December 31, 2015
	(In thousands)				(In thousands)
Credit impaired purchased loans evaluated individually for incurred credit losses
Outstanding balance	$	1,496	$	2,672	$	620	$	608
Carrying Amount		678		713		437		440
Other purchased loans evaluated collectively for incurred credit losses
Outstanding balance		52,188		59,808		56,603		57,581
Carrying Amount		50,569		57,920		56,209		57,422
Total Purchased Loans
Outstanding balance		53,684		62,480		57,223		58,189
Carrying Amount		51,247		58,633		56,646		57,862

~~As of the indicated dates, the~~The changes in the accretable discount related to the Citizens purchased credit impaired loans were as follows:


	Three Months Ended						Nine Months Ended						March 31, 2016
(In thousands)	September 30, 2015			September 30, 2014			September 30, 2015			September 30, 2014
													(In thousands)
Balance – beginning of period	$	326		$	332		$	310		$	378		$	217
Accretion recognized during the period		(48	)		(58	)		(104	)		(719	)		(6	)
Net reclassification from non-accretable to accretable		38			48			110			663			2

Balance – end of period	$	316		$	322		$	316		$	322		$	213

In January 2009, ~~the Company~~Riverview implemented a nonqualified stock option plan. The purpose of the 2009 Stock Option Plan was to advance the development, growth and financial condition of ~~the Company~~Riverview by providing incentives through participation in the appreciation of the common stock of ~~the Company~~Riverview to secure, retain and motivate its directors, officers and key employees and to align ~~those persons’~~such person’s interests with those of ~~the Company’s~~Riverview’s shareholders. Originally, ~~170,000 shares of the Company’s common stock were authorized to be issued under~~ the 2009 Stock Option ~~Plan.~~Plan authorized the issuance of 170,000 shares of Riverview common stock. On January 4, 2012, the 2009 Stock Option Plan was amended and restated to increase the total number of shares of common stock that may be issued under the Plan to ~~a total of~~ 220,000 ~~shares.~~shares in the aggregate. On April 16, 2014, the 2009 ~~Stock Option~~ Plan was again amended and restated to increase the total number of shares of common stock ~~by 130,000 shares, thus increasing the total number of available shares~~that may be issued under the Plan to 350,000 ~~shares.~~shares in the aggregate.

The vesting schedule for all ~~options~~option grants is a seven year cliff, which means that the options are 100% vested in the seventh year following the grant date and the expiration date of all options is ten years following the grant date. The Plan states that, upon the date of death of a participant, all awards granted pursuant to the agreement for that participant shall become fully vested and remain exercisable for the option grant’s remaining term. As of ~~September 30, 2015,~~March 31, 2016, there were ~~174,250~~171,000 option grants fully vested and exercisable. This vesting status was the result of the Board of Director’s approval as of December 31, 2013 to accelerate the vesting period for these options. There was no acceleration of vesting during 2016 or 2015.

Information pertaining to options outstanding at ~~September 30, 2015~~March 31, 2016 is as follows:

Options Outstanding

Options Exercisable

Options Outstanding

Options Exercisable

Range of
exercise
price

Number
Outstanding

Weighted
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Life

Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price

Number
Exercisable

Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price

Weighted
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Life

Number
Outstanding

Weighted
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Life

Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price

Number
Exercisable

Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price

Weighted
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Life

9.75 - $12.25

324,700

6.5 years

10.30

174,250

10.59

2.2 years

$9.75 - $13.05

344,250

6 years

10.48

171,000

9.83

2.2 years

There was intrinsic value associated with 318,950 stock options out of 344,250 outstanding stock options at March 31, 2016 considering that the market value of the stock ~~options outstanding~~as of the close of business at ~~September 30, 2015 because~~year end was $11.10 per share as compared with the option exercise ~~prices for the options were lower than the trading~~ price of ~~the stock.~~$10.00 for 107,200 options, $9.75 for 40,750 options, $10.35 for 9,250 options, and $10.60 for 161,750 options.

The Company accounts for these options in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles related toShare Based Payments, which requires that the fair value of the equity awards be recognized as compensation expense over the period during which the employee is required to provide service in exchange for such an award. ~~The Company~~Riverview amortizes compensation expense over the vesting period ~~or seven years.~~(seven years). Total compensation expense relating to the options that ~~has~~have been recognized ~~since inception of the Plan through September 30, 2015 was $320,000,~~is $339,000, of which ~~$8,000~~$11,000 was recorded for the three months ended ~~September 30, 2015 and $23,000 was recorded for the nine months ended September 30, 2015.~~March 31, 2016. The remaining unrecognized compensation expense as of ~~September 30, 2015~~March 31, 2016 was ~~$170,000.~~$222,000. In comparison with ~~2014,~~2015, $8,000 in option compensation expense was recorded for the three months ended ~~September 30, 2014 and $16,000 for~~March 31, 2015. The increase in option compensation expense in 2016 was due to the ~~nine months ended September 30, 2014.~~granting of 25,300 options during the fourth quarter of 2015.

During the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2016 and 2015, ~~2,500~~no options were granted ~~and no options were~~or exercised. In comparison, 147,950 options were granted during the nine months ended September 30, 2014, of which none were granted during the third quarter of 2014. Other than the 5,000 options exercised during the three months ended September 30, 2014, no other options were exercised during the nine months ended September 30, 2014.

~~In the ordinary course of business, the~~The Bank is party to financial instruments with off balance sheet risk in the normal course of business to meet the financing needs of its customers. These financial instruments consist primarily of commitments to extend credit, typically residential mortgage loans and commercial loans and, to a lesser extent, letters of credit. These instruments involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit and interest rate risk in excess of the amount recognized on the balance sheet.

The Bank’s exposure to credit loss in the event of nonperformance by the other party to the financial instrument for commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit is represented by the contractual amount of those instruments. The Bank uses the same credit policies in making such commitments and conditional obligations as it does for on balance sheet instruments. The Bank does not anticipate any material losses from those commitments.

The Bank’s exposure to credit loss for loan commitments (unfunded loans and unused lines of credit, including home equity lines of credit) and standby and performance letters of credit was as follows for the periods indicated:


	Contract or Notional Amount				Contract or Notional Amount
	September 30, 2015		December 31, 2014		March 31, 2016		December 31, 2015
	(In thousands)				(In thousands)
Commitments to grant loans	$	21,207	$	17,046	$	18,974	$	19,602
Unfunded commitments of existing loans		26,362		33,603		28,584		26,479
Standby and performance letters of credit		3,299		2,667		3,330		3,316

	$	50,868	$	53,316	$	50,888	$	49,397

Because these instruments have fixed maturity dates, and because many of them will expire without being drawn upon, they do not generally present any significant liquidity risk.

The ability of the Bank to transfer funds to the Company in the form of cash dividends, loans or advances is restricted by applicable regulations. Regulatory approval is required if the total of all dividends declared by a state-chartered bank in any calendar year exceeds net profits (as defined) for that year combined with the retained net profits for the two preceding years. At ~~September 30, 2015, $759,000~~March 31, 2016, $812,000 of undistributed earnings of the Bank, included in consolidated shareholders’ equity, was available for distribution to the Company as dividends without prior regulatory approval.

The Bank is subject to various regulatory capital requirements administered by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC). Failure to meet the minimum regulatory capital requirements can result in certain mandatory and possibly additional discretionary actions by regulators that if undertaken, could have a direct material adverse effect on the Company and the consolidated financial statements. Under the ~~Basel III~~ regulatory capital adequacy guidelines and the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action, the Bank must meet specific capital guidelines involving quantitative measures of its assets, liabilities and certain off-balance-sheet items as calculated under regulatory accounting practices. The capital amounts and classification under the prompt corrective action guidelines are also subject to qualitative judgments by the regulators about components, risk-weightings and other factors.

Quantitative measures established by regulation to ensure capital adequacy require the Bank to maintain minimum amounts and ratios of: total risk-based capital and Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets (as defined in the regulations), and Tier 1 capital to average total assets (as defined). Management believes that as of ~~September 30, 2015,~~March 31, 2016, the Bank met all ~~the~~applicable capital adequacy ~~requirements to which it~~requirements.

As of March 31, 2016, the Bank was ~~subject and meets~~categorized as well capitalized under the ~~criteria to be well capitalized.~~regulatory framework for prompt corrective action. To remain categorized as well capitalized, the Bank will have to maintain minimum total risk-based, Tier 1 risk-based and Tier 1 leverage ratios as disclosed in the table below. There are no conditions or events since ~~year end~~quarter-end that management believes have changed the Bank’s category.

The Federal Reserve Board approved a final rule in 2006 that expands the definition of a small bank holding company (“BHC”) under the Board’s Small Bank Holding Company Policy Statement and the Board’s risk-based and leverage capital guidelines for bank holding companies. ~~Based on~~In 2015, the ~~ruling,~~Federal Reserve increased the asset limit to qualify as a small bank holding company from $500 million to $1 billion. Currently, the Company meets the eligibility criteria of a small BHC and is exempt from ~~certain regulatory requirements administered by~~risk-based capital and leverage rules (including Basel III). However, the ~~federal banking agencies.~~Bank is not exempt from those requirements.

The Bank’s actual capital ratios, which include the impact of the merger of Citizens at ~~September 30, 2015~~March 31, 2016 and December 31, ~~2014,~~2015, and the minimum ratios required for capital adequacy purposes ~~and~~ to be considered well capitalized under the prompt corrective action provisions, are summarized ~~as follow:~~below for the periods presented:


	Actual					Minimum Regulatory Capital Ratios under Basel III (without 2.5% capital conservation buffer phase-in)						Well Capitalized under Basel III					Actual					Minimum Regulatory Capital Ratios under Basel III (with 2016 0.625% capital conservation buffer phase-in*)					Well Capitalized under Basel III
	Amount		Ratio			Amount		Ratio				Amount		Ratio			Amount		Ratio			Amount		Ratio			Amount		Ratio
	(Dollars in thousands)																(Dollars in thousands)
As of September 30, 2015:
As of March 31, 2016:
Total risk-based capital (to risk-weighted assets)*																	$	43,517		11.1	%	$	33,668	³	8.625	%	$	39,035	³	10.0	%
Tier 1 capital (to risk-weighted assets)*																		39,745		10.2	%		25,861	³	6.625	%		31,228	³	8.0	%
Tier 1 capital (to average total assets)																		39,745		7.4	%		21,420	³	4.0	%		26,775	³	5.0	%
Common equity tier 1 risk-based capital (to risk-weighted assets)*																		39,745		10.2	%		20,005	³	5.125	%		25,373	³	6.5	%

																	Actual					Minimum Regulatory Capital Ratios under Basel III (without 2.5% capital conservation buffer phase-in)					Well Capitalized under Basel III
																	Amount		Ratio			Amount		Ratio			Amount		Ratio
As of December 31, 2015:
Total risk-based capital (to risk-weighted assets)	$	38,605		10.8	%	$	28,574	³8.0%				$	35,718		³10.0	%	$	43,128		10.7	%	$	32,296	³	8.0	%	$	40,370	³	10.0	%
Tier 1 capital (to risk-weighted assets)		34,605		9.7	%		21,431	³6.0%					28,574		³8.0	%		38,710		9.6	%		24,222	³	6.0	%		32,296	³	8.0	%
Tier 1 capital (to average total assets)		34,605		7.8	%		17,755	³4.0%					22,194		³5.0	%		38,710		7.2	%		21,611	³	4.0	%		27,014	³	5.0	%
Common equity tier 1 risk-based capital (to risk-weighted assets)		34,605		9.7	%		16,073	³4.5%					23,217		³6.5	%		38,710		9.6	%		18,167	³	4.5	%		26,241	³	6.5	%

	Actual					Minimum Regulatory Capital Ratios						Well Capitalized under Prompt Corrective Action Provisions
	Amount		Ratio			Amount			Ratio			Amount		Ratio
As of December 31, 2014:
Total risk-based capital (to risk-weighted assets)	$	37,899		11.5	%		$26,385			³8.0	%	$	32,982		³10.0	%
Tier 1 capital (to risk-weighted assets)		34,096		10.3	%		13,193			³4.0	%		19,789		³6.0	%
Tier 1 capital (to average total assets)		34,096		8.0	%		17,103			³4.0	%		21,378		³5.0	%

The Basel III capital rules became effective for the Bank on January 1, 2015. A new capital ratio - Common equity tier 1 risk-based capital – was introduced under the Basel III capital rules. The presentation does not take into account the 2.5% capital conservation buffer phase-in because the buffer does not apply until 2016, with full phase-in to be effective by 2019.

Management uses its best judgment in estimating the fair value of the Company’s financial instruments. However, there are inherent weaknesses in any estimation technique. Therefore, for substantially all financial instruments, the fair value estimates set forth herein

Note 9 – Fair Value Measurements and Fair Values of Financial Instruments (continued)

are not necessarily indicative of the amounts the Company could have realized in sales transactions on the dates indicated. The estimated fair value amounts have been measured as of their respective ~~year-ends~~period-ends and have not been re-evaluated or updated for purposes of these financial statements subsequent to those respective dates. As such, the estimated fair values of these financial instruments subsequent to the respective reporting dates may be different than the amounts reported at each ~~year-end.~~

~~Note 10 - Fair Value Measurements and Fair Values of Financial Instruments (continued)~~

TheFair Value Measurements standard establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation methods used to measure fair value. The hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1 measurements) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3 measurements). The three levels of the fair value hierarchy under this standard are as follows:

An asset’s or liability’s level within the fair value hierarchy is based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. At ~~September 30, 2015~~March 31, 2016 and December 31, ~~2014,~~2015, the Company had no liabilities subject to fair value reporting measurement requirements.

The fair value of securities available for sale are determined by matrix pricing (Level 2), which is a mathematical technique used widely in the industry to value debt securities without relying exclusively on quoted market prices for specific securities, but rather by relying on the securities’ relationship to other benchmark quoted prices. For these securities, the Company obtains fair value measurements from an independent pricing service. For financial assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis, the fair value measurements by level within the fair value hierarchy used at ~~September 30, 2015~~March 31, 2016 and December 31, ~~2014~~2015 were as follows:

~~Note 10 - Fair Value Measurements and Fair Values of Financial Instruments (continued)~~

Certain financial assets are measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Adjustments to the fair value of these assets usually results from the application of lower-of-cost-or-market accounting or write-downs of individual assets. The following discussion describes the valuation techniques used by the Company to measure certain financial assets recorded at fair value on a nonrecurring basis in the financial statements.

Note 9 – Fair Value Measurements and Fair Values of Financial Instruments (continued)

Loans held for sale are carried at the lower of cost or fair value. These loans typically consist of one-to-four family residential loans originated for sale in the secondary market. Fair value is based on the price secondary markets are currently offering for similar loans using observable market data which is not materially different than cost due to the short duration between origination and sale (Level 2). As such, the Company records any fair value adjustments on a nonrecurring basis.

Certain assets such as other real estate owned (OREO) are measured at fair value of real estate acquired through foreclosure at an estimated fair value less cost to sell. At or near the time of foreclosure, real estate appraisals are obtained on the properties acquired through foreclosure. The real estate is then valued at the lesser of the appraised value or the loan balance, including interest receivable, at the time of foreclosure less an estimate of costs to sell the property. Appraised values are typically determined utilizing an income or market valuation approach based on an appraisal conducted by an independent, licensed appraiser outside of the Company using observable market data (Level 2). However, if the acquired property is a house or building in the process of construction or if an appraisal of the real estate property is over two years old, then the fair value is considered a Level 3. The estimate of costs to sell the property is based on historical transactions of similar holdings.

ASC 820 applies to loans measured for impairment using the practical expedients permitted by generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), including impaired loans measured at an observable market price (if available), or at the fair value of the loan’s collateral (if the loan is collateral dependent). Fair value of the loan’s collateral, when the loan is dependent on collateral, is determined by appraisals or independent valuation which is then adjusted for the cost related to liquidation of collateral. The value of the collateral is typically determined utilizing an income or market valuation approach based on an appraisal conducted by an independent, licensed appraiser outside of the Company using observable market data (Level 2). However, if the collateral is a house or building in the process of construction or if an appraisal of the real estate property is over two years old, then the fair value is considered Level 3. The value of business equipment is based upon an outside appraisal if deemed significant, or the net book value of the applicable business’ financial statements if not considered significant using observable market data. Likewise, values for inventory and accounts receivable collateral are based on financial statement balances or aging reports (Level 3). Impaired loans are measured at the lower of cost or fair value of the underlying collateral less estimated costs to sell on a nonrecurring basis. Any fair value adjustments are recorded in the period incurred as a provision for loan losses on the Consolidated Statements of Income. The Company had impaired loans of ~~$9,688,000~~$8,332,000 at ~~September 30, 2015,~~March 31, 2016, of which ~~$1,501,000~~$656,000 required a valuation allowance of ~~$133,000.~~$41,000. This level compares with impaired loans of ~~$8,408,000~~$9,548,000 at December 31, ~~2014,~~2015, of which ~~$738,000~~$1,124,000 required a valuation allowance of ~~$82,000.~~$715,000.

The fair value of goodwill is determined in the same manner as goodwill recognized in a business combination and uses standard valuation methodologies. Fair value may be determined using market prices, comparison to similar assets, market multiples, discounted cash flow analysis and other factors. Estimated cash flows may extend far into the future and by their nature are difficult to determine over an extended time frame. Factors that may significantly affect the estimates include specific industry or market sector conditions, changes in revenue growth trends, customer behavior, competitive forces, cost structures and changes in discount rates. The Company did not record any goodwill impairment during the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30, 2015~~March 31, 2016 or ~~2014.~~2015.

Note ~~10 -~~9 – Fair Value Measurements and Fair Values of Financial Instruments (continued)

A summary of assets at ~~September 30, 2015~~March 31, 2016 and December 31, ~~2014,~~2015, measured at estimated fair value on a nonrecurring basis follows:


	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total		Total Gains/(Losses)			Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total		Total Gains/(Losses)
	(In thousands)											(In thousands)
September 30, 2015:
March 31, 2016:
Loans held for sale	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—		$	—	$	594	$	—	$	594	$	—
Other real estate owned		—		1,057		—		1,057		(92	)		—		1,043		—		1,043		—
Impaired loans, net of related allowance		—		1,368		—		1,368		—			—		615		—		615		—

Total	$	—	$	2,425	$	—	$	2,425	$	(92	)	$	—	$	2,252	$	—	$	2,252	$	—


	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total		Total Gains/(Losses)			Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total		Total Gains/(Losses)
	(In thousands)											(In thousands)
December 31, 2014:
December 31, 2015:
Loans held for sale	$	—	$	216	$	—	$	216	$	—		$	—	$	1,094	$	—	$	1,094	$	—
Other real estate owned		—		1,022		—		1,022		(317	)		—		885		—		885		(220	)
Impaired loans, net of related allowance		—		656		—		656		—			—		316		93		409		—

Total	$	—	$	1,894		—	$	1,894	($	317	)	$	—	$	2,295	$	93	$	2,388	($	220	)

The following table presents additional quantitative information about assets measures at fair value on a nonrecurring basis and for which Level 3 inputs have been used to determine fair value (in thousands):

The following information should not be interpreted as an estimate of the fair value of the Company since a fair value calculation is only provided for a limited portion of the Company’s assets and liabilities. Due to a wide range of valuation techniques and the degree of subjectivity used in making the estimates, comparisons between the Company’s disclosures and those of other companies may not be meaningful. The following methods and assumptions were used to estimate the fair values of the Company’s financial instruments at ~~September 30, 2015~~March 31, 2016 and December 31, ~~2014.~~2015.

The carrying amount reported in the balance sheet for cash, due from banks, federal funds sold and interest-bearing deposits approximate those assets’ fair values.

Fair values for fixed-rate time certificates of deposit approximate cost. The Company generally purchases amounts below the insured limit, thus limiting the amount of credit risk on these time deposits.

The fair value of securities available-for-sale (carried at fair value) are determined by obtaining quoted market prices on nationally recognized securities exchanges (Level 1), or matrix pricing (Level 2), which is a mathematical technique used widely in the industry to value debt securities without relying exclusively on quoted market prices for the specific securities but rather by relying on the

Note 9 – Fair Value Measurements and Fair Values of Financial Instruments (continued)

securities’ relationship to other benchmark quoted prices. For certain securities which are not traded in active markets or are subject to transfer restrictions, valuations are adjusted to reflect illiquidity and/or non-transferability, and such adjustments are generally based on available market evidence (Level 3). In the absence of such evidence, management’s best estimate is used. Management’s best estimate consists of both internal and external support on certain Level 3 investments. Internal cash flow models using a present value formula that include assumptions market participants would use along with indicative exit pricing obtained from broker/dealers (where available) are used to support fair values of certain Level 3 investments, if applicable.

The fair value of mortgages held for sale is determined, when possible, using quoted secondary market prices. If no such quoted prices exist, the fair value of the loan is determined using quoted market prices for a similar loan or loans, adjusted for the specific attributes of that loan.

~~Note 10 - Fair Value Measurements and Fair Values of Financial Instruments (continued)~~

The fair values of loans are estimated using discounted cash flow analysis, using market rates at the balance sheet date that reflect the credit and interest rate-risk inherent in the loans. Projected future cash flows are calculated based upon contractual maturities or call dates, projected repayments and prepayments of principal. Generally, for variable rate loans that reprice frequently and with no significant change in credit risk, fair values are based on carrying values.

~~Impaired loans are those that are accounted for under the standard regarding~~~~Accounting by Creditors for Impairment of a Loan~~, in which the Company has measured impairment generally based on the fair value of the loan’s collateral. Fair value is generally determined based upon independent third-party appraisals of the properties, or discounted cash flows based upon the expected proceeds. These assets are included as Level 2 fair values, based upon the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement.

The carrying amount of restricted investment in Bank stock approximates fair value, and considers the limited marketability of such securities.

The carrying amount of accrued interest receivable and accrued interest payable approximates its fair value.

The fair values disclosed for demand deposits (e.g., interest and noninterest checking, passbook savings and money market accounts) are, by definition, equal to the amount payable on demand at the reporting date (i.e., their carrying amounts). Fair values for fixed-rate certificates of deposit are estimated using a discounted cash flow calculation that applies interest rates currently being offered in the market on certificates to a schedule of aggregated expected monthly maturities on time deposits.

Fair values of FHLB advances are estimated using discounted cash flow analysis, based on quoted prices for new FHLB advances with similar credit risk characteristics, terms and remaining maturity. The prices were obtained from an active market and represent a fair value that is deemed to represent the transfer price if the liability were assumed by a third party.

Fair values for the Company’s off-balance sheet financial instruments (lending commitments and letters of credit) are based on fees currently charged in the market to enter into similar agreements, taking into account the remaining terms of the agreements and the counterparties’ credit standing.

Note ~~10 -~~9 – Fair Value Measurements and Fair Values of Financial Instruments (continued)

The estimated fair values of the Company’s financial instruments at ~~September 30, 2015~~March 31, 2016 and December 31, ~~2014~~2015 are presented as follows:


			Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2014 Using:										Fair Value Measurements at March 31, 2016 Using:
	Carrying Amount		Fair Value		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
(In thousands)											Carrying Amount		Fair Value		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
Financial assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	14,580	$	14,580	$	14,580	$	—	$	—	$	24,349	$	24,349	$	24,349	$	—	$	—
Interest-bearing time deposits		992		992		992		—		—		990		990		990		—		—
Investment securities		48,818		48,818		495		48,323		—		73,317		73,317		492		72,825		—
Mortgage loans held for sale		216		216		—		216		—		594		594		—		594		—
Loans, net		338,901		341,121		—		341,121		—		397,765		398,630		—		398,630		—
Accrued interest receivable		1,237		1,237		—		1,237		—		1,610		1,610		1,610		—		—
Restricted investments in bank stocks		1,002		1,002		—		—		1,002		1,596		1,596		—		—		1,596
Financial liabilities:
Deposits		372,262		366,510		—		366,510		—		455,504		457,791		—		457,791		—
Capital lease payable		1,655		1,655		—		1,655		—
Short-term borrowings		12,500		12,499		—		12,499		—		25,000		25,000		—		25,000		—
Long-term borrowings		7,000		7,283		—		7,283		—		11,400		11,412		—		11,412		—
Accrued interest payable		154		154		—		154		—		267		267		267		—		—
Off balance sheet financial instruments		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—

													Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2015 Using:
(In thousands)											Carrying Amount		Fair Value		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
Financial assets:
Cash and cash equivalents											$	21,697	$	21,697	$	21,697	$	—	$	—
Interest-bearing time deposits												991		991		991		—		—
Investment securities												75,850		75,850		499		75,351		—
Mortgage loans held for sale												1,094		1,094		—		1,094		—
Loans, net												405,480		411,521		—		411,428		93
Accrued interest receivable												1,594		1,594		1,594		—		—
Restricted investments in bank stocks												2,315		2,315		—		—		2,315
Financial liabilities:
Deposits												448,342		441,413		—		441,413		—
Short-term borrowings												42,275		42,275		—		42,275		—
Long-term borrowings												9,350		9,343		—		9,343		—
Accrued interest payable												236		236		236		—		—
Off balance sheet financial instruments												—		—		—		—		—

In June 2014, the FASB issued ASC Update 2014-12, “Accounting for Share-Based Payments When the Terms of an Award Provide That a Performance Target Could Be Achieved after the Requisite Service Period”. ASC Update 2014-12 clarifies guidance related to accounting for share-based payment awards with terms that allow an employee’s award to vest regardless of whether the employee is rendering service on the date a performance target is achieved. ASC Update 2014-12 requires that a performance target that affects vesting, and that could be achieved after the requisite service period, be treated as a performance condition. As such, the performance target should not be reflected in estimating the grant-date fair value of the award. ASC Update 2014-12 is effective for public business entities’ interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2015, with earlier adoption permitted. The adoption of ASC Update 2014-12 is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In August 2014, the FASB issued ASC Update 2014-15, “Presentation of Financial Statements - Going Concern”. ASC Update 2014-15 provides guidance regarding management’s responsibility to evaluate whether there is substantial doubt about an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern and to provide related disclosures. The standards update describes how an entity’s management should

assess whether there are conditions and events, considered in the aggregate, that raise substantial doubt about an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern within one year after the date that the financial statements are issued. ASC Update 2014-15 is effective for public business entities’ annual reporting periods ending after December 15, 2016, with earlier adoption permitted. The adoption of ASC Update 2014-15 is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In January 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-01, “Income Statement—Extraordinary and Unusual Items (Subtopic 225-20): Simplifying Income Statement Presentation by Eliminating the Concept of Extraordinary Items”. The amendments in this ASU eliminate from GAAP the concept of extraordinary items. Subtopic 225-20, Income Statement—Extraordinary and Unusual Items, required that an entity separately classify, present, and disclose extraordinary events and transactions. Presently, an event or transaction is presumed to be an ordinary and usual activity of the reporting entity unless evidence clearly supports its classification as an extraordinary item. If an event or transaction meets the criteria for extraordinary classification, an entity is required to segregate the extraordinary item from the results of ordinary operations and show the item separately in the income statement, net of tax, after income from continuing operations. The entity also is required to disclose applicable income taxes and either present or disclose earnings-per-share data applicable to the extraordinary item. The amendments in this ASU are effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2015. Early adoption is permitted provided that the guidance is applied from the beginning of the fiscal year of adoption. The Company does not expect the adoption of ASU 2015-01 to have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.

In February 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-02, “Consolidation (Topic 810): Amendments to the Consolidation Analysis”. The amendments in this ASU are intended to improve targeted areas of consolidation guidance for legal entities such as limited partnerships, limited liability corporations, and securitization structures (collateralized debt obligations, collateralized loan obligations, and mortgage-backed security transactions). In addition to reducing the number of consolidation models from four to two, the new standard simplifies the FASB Accounting Standards Codification and improves current GAAP by placing more emphasis on risk of loss when determining a controlling financial interest, reducing the frequency of the application of related-party guidance when determining a controlling financial interest in a variable interest entity (“VIE”) and changing consolidation conclusions for public and private companies in several industries that typically make use of limited partnerships or VIEs. The amendments in this ASU are effective for public business entities for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2015. Early adoption is permitted, including adoption in an interim period. ASU 2015-02 may be applied retrospectively in previously issued financial statements for one or more years with a cumulative-effect adjustment to retained earnings as of the beginning of the first year restated. The Company does not expect the adoption of ASU 2015-02 to have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.

In April 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-05, “Intangibles—Goodwill and Other—Internal-Use Software (Subtopic 350-40): Customer’s Accounting for Fees Paid in a Cloud Computing Arrangement.” The amendments in this ASU provide guidance to customers about whether a cloud computing arrangement includes a software license. If a cloud computing arrangement includes a software license, then the customer should account for the software license element of the arrangement consistent with the acquisition of other software licenses. If a cloud computing arrangement does not include a software license, the customer should account for the arrangement as a service contract. The amendments do not change the accounting for a customer’s accounting for service contracts. As a result of the amendments, all software licenses within the scope of Subtopic 350-40 will be accounted for consistent with other licenses of intangible assets. The amendments in this ASU are effective for public business entities for annual periods, including interim periods within those annual periods, beginning after December 15, 2015. Early adoption is permitted. An entity can elect to adopt the amendments either: (1) prospectively to all arrangements entered into or materially modified after the effective date; or (2) retrospectively. The Company is currently assessing the impact that ASU 2015-05 will have on its consolidated financial statements.

In July 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-12, “Plan Accounting: Defined Benefit Pension Plans (Topic 960), Defined Contribution Pension Plans (Topic 962), and Health and Welfare Benefit Plans (Topic 965) – 1. Fully Benefit -Responsive Investment Contracts, 2. Plan Investment Disclosures, and 3. Measurement Date Practical Expedient”. The amendments within this ASU are in 3 parts. Among other things, Part 1 amendments designate contract value as the only required measure for fully benefit-responsive investment contracts; Part II amendments eliminate the requirement that plans disclose: (a) individual investments that represent 5 percent or more of net assets available for benefits; and (b) the net appreciation or depreciation for investments by general type requirements for both participant-directed investments and nonparticipant-directed investments. Part III amendments provide a practical expedient to permit plans to measure investments and investment- related accounts (e.g., a liability for a pending trade with a broker) as of a month-end date that is closest to the plan’s fiscal year-end, when the fiscal period does not coincide with month-end. The amendments in Parts 1 and 2 of this ASU are effective on a retrospective basis and Part 3 is effective on a prospective basis, for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2015. Early adoption is permitted. The Company is currently assessing the impact that ASU 2015-12 will have on its consolidated financial statements.

In August 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-14, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Deferral of Effective Date”. The amendments in ASU 2015-14 defer the effective date of ASU 2014-09 for all entities by one year. Public business entities, certain not-for-profit entities, and certain employee benefit plans should apply the guidance in ASU 2014-09 to annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim reporting periods within that reporting period. Earlier application is permitted only as of annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016, including interim reporting periods within that reporting period. All other entities should apply the guidance in ASU 2014-09 to annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2018, and interim reporting periods within annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2019. All other entities may apply the guidance in ASU 2014-09 earlier as of an annual reporting period beginning after December 15, 2016, including interim reporting periods within that reporting period. All other entities also may apply the guidance in ASU 2014-09 earlier as of an annual reporting period beginning after December 15, 2016, and interim reporting periods within annual reporting periods beginning one year after the annual reporting period in which the entity first applies the guidance in ASU 2014-09. The Company ~~does not expect~~is currently assessing the ~~adoption of~~impact that ASU 2015-14 (or ASU ~~2014-09) to~~2014-19) will have ~~a material impact~~ on its consolidated financial statements.

In ~~August 2015,~~January 2016, the FASB issued ASU ~~2015-15, “Interest – Imputation of Interest~~2016-01, “Financial Instruments - Overall (Subtopic ~~835-30) – Presentation~~825-10): Recognition and ~~Subsequent~~ Measurement of Debt Issuance Costs Associated with Line-of-Credit Arrangements (Amendments to SEC Paragraphs Pursuant to Staff Announcement at June 18, 2015 EITF Meeting)”. On April 7, 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-03, Interest—Imputation of Interest (Subtopic 835-30): Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs, which requires entities to present debt issuance costs related to a recognized debt liability as a direct deduction from the carrying amount of that debt liability. The guidance in ASU 2015-03 (see paragraph 835-30-45-1A) does not address presentation or subsequent measurement of debt issuance costs related to line-of-credit arrangements. Given the absence of authoritative guidance within ASU 2015-03 for debt issuance costs related to line-of-credit arrangements, the SEC staff stated that they would not object to an entity deferringFinancial Assets and presenting debt issuance costs as an asset and subsequently amortizing the deferred debt issuance costs ratably over the term of the line- of-credit arrangement, regardless of whether there are any outstanding borrowings on the line-of-credit arrangement. ASU 2015-15 adds these SEC comments to the “S” section of the Codification. The Company does not expect the adoption of ASU 2015-15 to have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.

~~In September 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-16, “Business Combinations (Topic 805): Simplifying the Accounting for Measurement-Period Adjustments”.~~Financial Liabilities.” The amendments in ASU ~~2015-16 require~~2016-01, among other things: (1) Requires equity investments (expect those accounted for under the equity method of accounting, or those that ~~an acquirer recognize adjustments~~result in consolidation of the investee) to estimated amounts that are identified during the measurement period in the reporting period in which the adjustment amounts are determined. The amendments require that the acquirer record, in the same period’s financial statements, the effect on earnings ofbe measured at fair value with changes in ~~depreciation, amortization,~~fair value recognized in net income; (2) Requires public business entities to use the exit price notion when measuring the fair value of financial instruments for disclosure purposes; (3) Requires separate presentation of financial assets and liabilities by measurement category and form of financial asset (i.e., securities or ~~other income effects, if any, as a result of~~loans and receivables); and (4) Eliminates the ~~change~~requirement for public business entities to disclose the ~~estimated amounts, calculated as if~~method(s) and significant assumptions used to estimate the ~~accounting had been completed~~fair value that is required to be disclosed for financial instruments measured at the acquisition date. The amendments also require an entity to present separately on the face of the income statement or disclose in the notes the portion of the amount recorded in current-period earnings by line item that would have been recorded in previous reporting periods if the adjustment to the estimated amounts had been recognized as of the acquisition date.amortized cost. The amendments in this ASU are effective for public ~~business entities~~companies for fiscal years beginning after December 15, ~~2015,~~2017, including interim periods within those fiscal years. ~~For~~The Company is currently assessing the impact that ASU 2016-01 will have on its consolidated financial statements.

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, “Leases (Topic 842).” Among other things, in the amendments in ASU 2016-02, lessees will be required to recognize the following for all ~~other entities,~~leases (with the exception of short-term leases) at the commencement date: (1) A lease liability, which is a lessee’s obligation to make lease payments arising from a lease, measured on a discounted basis; and (2) A right-of-use asset, which is an asset that represents the lessee’s right to use, or control the use of, a specified asset for the lease term. Under the new guidance, lessor accounting is largely unchanged. Certain targeted improvements were made to align, where necessary, lessor accounting with the lessee accounting model and Topic 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers. The amendments in this ASU are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, ~~2016, and~~2018, including interim periods within those fiscal ~~years beginning after December 15, 2017. The amendments should be applied prospectively to adjustments to provisional amounts that occur~~years. Early application is permitted upon issuance. Lessees (for capital and operating leases) and lessors (for sales-type, direct financing, and operating leases) must apply a modified retrospective transition approach for leases existing at, or entered into after, the ~~effective date with earlier application permitted~~beginning of the earliest comparative period presented in the financial statements. The modified retrospective approach would not require any transition accounting for ~~financial statements~~leases that ~~have~~expired before the earliest comparative period presented. Lessees and lessors may not ~~been issued.~~apply a full retrospective transition approach. The Company ~~does not expect~~is currently assessing the ~~adoption of~~impact that ASU ~~2015-16 to~~2016-02 will have ~~a material impact~~ on its consolidated financial statements.

ITEM 2.

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSIONAND ANALYSISOF FINANCIAL CONDITIONAND RESULTSOF OPERATIONSOF RIVERVIEW FINANCIAL CORPORATION

The following discussion and analysis summarizes the Company’s results of operations and highlights material changes for the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2016 and March 31, 2015 ~~and September 30, 2014~~ and its financial condition as of ~~September 30, 2015.~~March 31, 2016. This discussion is intended to provide additional information which may not be readily apparent from the consolidated selected financial data included in this report.

This discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and related footnotes presented in the Company’s December 31, ~~2014~~2015 Annual Report contained in the Form 10-K. Current performance does not guarantee and may not be indicative of similar performance in the future. Other than as described herein, management does not believe there are any trends, events or uncertainties that are reasonably expected to have a material impact on future results of operations, liquidity or capital resources.

Certain of the matters discussed in this document and in documents incorporated by reference herein, including matters discussed below, may constitute forward-looking statements for purposes of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and as such may involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors which may cause the actual results, performance or achievements of the Company to be materially different from future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. The words “expect,” “anticipate,” “intend,” “plan,” “believe,” “estimate,” and similar expressions are intended to identify such forward-looking statements.

The Company’s actual results may differ materially from the results anticipated in these forward-looking statements due to a variety of factors, including, without limitation:

All written or oral forward-looking statements attributable to the Company are expressly qualified in their entirety by these cautionary statements. ~~The Company does not undertake any obligation to update forward looking statements.~~

The consolidated financial statements include Riverview Financial Corporation and its wholly-owned subsidiary, Riverview Bank. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated.

The accounting and reporting policies followed by the Company conform, in all material respects, to accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. In preparing the consolidated financial statements, management has made estimates, judgments and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities as of the date of the consolidated balance sheets and results of operations for the periods indicated. Actual results could differ significantly from those estimates.

The Company has adopted various accounting policies that govern the application of accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and that are consistent with general practices within the banking industry in the preparation of its consolidated financial statements. The Company’s significant accounting policies are described in Note 1 of the Notes to ~~unaudited consolidated financial statements~~Consolidated Financial Statements for the period ended ~~September 30, 2015 herein~~March 31, 2016 contained in Part I, Item 1, “Notes to Consolidated Financial ~~Statements.~~Statements”.

Certain accounting policies involve significant judgments and assumptions by the Company that have a material impact on the carrying value of certain assets and liabilities. The Company considers these accounting policies to be critical accounting policies. The judgment and assumptions used are based on historical experience and other factors, which the Company believes to be reasonable under the circumstances. Because of the nature of the judgments and assumptions made, actual results could differ from these estimates, which could have a material impact on the carrying values of its assets and liabilities and its results of operations.

~~Effective~~On November 1, 2013, Riverview Financial Corporation (the ~~“effective date”~~“Company”)~~, and pursuant to the Amended and Restated Agreement and Plan of Consolidation (the “Agreement”), dated, April 24, 2013, by and between Riverview~~ and Union ~~Riverview and Union~~Bancorp, Inc. (“Union”) consolidated to form a new Pennsylvania corporation under the name of Riverview Financial Corporation (the ~~“consolidation”~~“Company”). Riverview Bank (the “Bank”) is the wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company.

On December 31, 2015, The Citizens National Bank of Meyersdale (“Citizens”) merged with and into Riverview Bank, with Riverview Bank surviving.

The Company’s financial results reflect the ~~consolidation. The combined financial information reflects the impact of the~~ consolidation of ~~Riverview’s~~Union and ~~Union’s combined financial condition~~the merger of Citizens under the purchase method of accounting with the Company treated as the acquirer from an accounting standpoint. ~~Under this method,~~The balance sheet as of December 31, 2015, includes the ~~Company’s formation was treated as a recapitalization of Riverview, with Riverview’s~~former Citizens’ assets and ~~liabilities recorded~~liabilities.

Consolidated total assets were $540,915,000 at ~~their historical values, and Union’s assets and liabilities recorded~~March 31, 2016, a decrease of $8,534,000, or 1.5%, from $549,449,000 at ~~their fair values as~~December 31, 2015, which was attributable to a decrease in loans of ~~the date the consolidation was completed.~~$7,715,000 to $397,765,000, which were not yet reinvested in new loans due to loan payoffs. The ~~transaction was effective on November 1, 2013.~~Company’s deposits increased $7,162,000, or 1.6%, to $455,504,000.

As a community-focused financial institution, the Company, through its wholly-owned banking subsidiary, generates the majority of its revenues from net interest income derived from its core banking activities, which totaled ~~$11,266,000~~$4,530,000 at ~~September 30, 2015~~March 31, 2016 as compared with ~~$11,962,000~~$3,713,000 at ~~September 30, 2014. Consolidated total assets were $451,965,000 at September 30, 2015, an increase of $15,819,000, or 3.6%, from $436,146,000 at December~~March 31, ~~2014. The Company’s loans increased $9,413,000, or 2.8%, to $348,314,000 at September 30, 2015, while deposits increased $6,473,000, or 1.7%, to $378,735,000.~~2015. For the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September 30, 2015,~~March 31, 2016, the Company ~~experienced a~~recorded net ~~loss~~income of ~~$348,000~~$753,000 as compared with net income of ~~$2,211,000~~$374,000 for the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September 30, 2014.~~March 31, 2015. The ~~decrease~~increase in ~~2015~~2016 earnings was attributable to the ~~implementation~~added volume of ~~restructuring, branch closures~~interest earning assets and ~~other~~interest bearing liabilities from the Citizens merger, which resulted in increased net interest income. Operating results were further enhanced by the effects of strategic efficiency initiatives ~~which negatively affected earnings thus far, but are expected~~completed during 2015. Partially offsetting the increase in net interest income, the provision for loan losses in the first quarter of 2016 was $99,000 compared with no provision in the first quarter of 2015, driven primarily by an increase in the historical loss factor due to ~~enhance future profitability. It is management’s intent to continue to grow while improving productivity throughout~~ the ~~Company.~~charge-off of one large commercial loan and an increase in the unallocated portion of the allowance. Basic and diluted earnings per share of ~~($0.13)~~$0.23 per share for the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September 30, 2015 decreased~~March 31, 2016 increased from basic and diluted earnings per share of ~~$0.82 per share~~$0.14 for the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September 30, 2014.~~March 31, 2015. The ~~decrease~~increase in earnings per share was attributable to the ~~decrease~~increase in net income ~~year~~period over ~~year,~~period, which also ~~negatively~~positively impacted the return on average assets, which was ~~(0.10%) at September 30,~~0.56% for the three months ended March 31, 2016, an increase from 0.34% for the three months ended March 31, 2015, ~~a decrease from 0.68% at September 30, 2014,~~ and the return on average equity, which was ~~(1.23%) at September 30, 2015~~7.13% for the period ended March 31, 2016 as compared to ~~7.81% as of September 30, 2014.~~

The Company’s income is primarily derived from income generated on the spread between the interest received on its interest-earning assets and the interest paid on its interest-bearing liabilities, which was 3.69%3.97% for the ~~nine months~~period ended September 30, 2015 on a fully tax equivalent basis, as compared with 4.06% for the nine months ended September 30, 2014. Changes in net interest income are not only affected by changes in interest rates, but are also impacted by changes in the make-up and volume of the balance sheet as well as the level of yield generated from interest-earning assets versus the costs associated with interest-bearing liabilities. March 31, 2015.

The Company also generates non-interest income from fees associated with various products and services offered to customers, mortgage banking activities, bank owned life insurance (“BOLI”), wealth management and trust operations, and from the sale of assets, such as loans or investments. Offsetting these revenues are provisions for potential losses on loans, administrative expenses and income taxes.

The following table presents Riverview’s average balances, interest rates, interest income and expense, interest rate spread and net interest margin, adjusted to a fully-tax equivalent basis (a non-GAAP financial measurement), for the three months ended ~~September 30, 2015~~March 31, 2016 and ~~2014.~~


	For the Three Months Ended
Average Balances and Average Interest Rates (Dollars in thousands)
	September 30,																For the Three Months Ended March 31,
	2015								2014								2016								2015
	Average Balance		Interest			Average Rate			Average Balance		Interest			Average Rate			Average Balance		Interest			Average Rate			Average Balance		Interest			Average Rate
Assets
Interest earning assets:
Securities:
Taxable	$	31,786	$	228			2.85	%	$	40,808	$	313			3.04	%	$	53,276	$	401			3.03	%	$	33,538	$	243			2.94	%
Tax-exempt		18,132		202			4.42	%		20,206		241			4.73	%		19,244		206			4.31	%		13,419		142			4.29	%

Total securities		49,918		430			3.42	%		61,014		554			3.60	%		72,520		607			3.37	%		46,957		385			3.33	%

Loans:
Consumer		2,392		31			5.14	%		1,979		33			6.62	%		3,807		83			8.77	%		2,068		31			6.08	%
Commercial		41,658		439			4.18	%		37,167		460			4.91	%		46,273		457			3.97	%		38,888		403			4.20	%
Real estate		307,056		3,468			4.48	%		289,341		3,369			4.62	%		356,412		4,018			4.53	%		305,708		3,431			4.55	%

Total loans		351,106		3,938			4.45	%		328,487		3,862			4.66	%		406,492		4,558			4.51	%		346,664		3,865			4.52	%

Other interest earning assets		11,034		31			1.11	%		11,248		20			0.71	%		12,076		45			1.50	%		10,738		52			1.96	%

Total earning assets		412,058		4,399			4.24	%		400,749		4,436			4.39	%		491,088	$	5,210			4.27	%		404,359	$	4,302			4.32	%

Non-interest earning assets		36,195								37,675								53,986								36,632

Total assets	$	448,253							$	438,424							$	545,074							$	440,991

Liabilities and shareholders’ equity
Interest-bearing liabilities:
Deposit accounts:
Interest-bearing demand	$	138,436	$	125			0.36	%	$	131,521	$	122			0.37	%	$	139,933	$	113			0.32	%	$	132,815	$	116			0.35	%
Savings		90,557		53			0.23	%		87,460		50			0.23	%		112,473		74			0.26	%		84,291		48			0.23	%
Time deposits		93,413		241			1.02	%		104,149		260			0.99	%		135,911		279			0.83	%		100,818		275			1.11	%

Total deposits		322,406		419			0.52	%		323,130		432			0.53	%		388,317		466			0.48	%		317,924		439			0.56	%

Borrowings:
Short-term borrowings		17,058		15			0.35	%		13,569		9			0.26	%		29,593		43			0.58	%		19,524		15			0.31	%
Long-term borrowings		6,359		29			1.75	%		7,000		63			3.57	%		9,440		56			2.39	%		7000		55			3.19	%

Total borrowings		23,417		44			0.73	%		20,569		72			1.39	%		39,033		99			1.02	%		26,524		70			1.07	%

Total interest bearing liabilities		345,823		463			0.53	%		343,699		504			0.58	%		427,350	$	565			0.53	%		344,448	$	509			0.60	%

Demand deposits		59,836								52,161								68,274								53,782
Other liabilities		6,034								4,120								6,613								4,522
Shareholders’ equity		36,560								38,444								42,837								38,239

Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity	$	448,253							$	438,424							$	545,074							$	440,991

Net interest income (non-GAAP)			$	3,936							$	3,932							$	4,645							$	3,793
Tax benefit on tax-exempt securities				(69	)							(82	)							(70	)							(48	)
Tax benefit on tax-exempt loans				(39	)							(23	)							(45	)							(32	)

Total tax-equivalent adjustment				(108	)							(105	)							(115	)							(80	)

Net interest income (GAAP)			$	3,828							$	3,827							$	4,530							$	3,713

Net interest spread							3.71	%							3.81	%							3.74	%							3.72	%

Net interest margin							3.79	%							3.89	%							3.80	%							3.80	%

Tax-exempt income is presented on a fully tax-equivalent basis assuming a tax rate of 34%.

For yield computation purposes, non-accruing loans are included in average loan balances and any income recognized on these loans is included in interest income.

Securities held as available-for-sale are carried at amortized cost for purposes of calculating average yield.

For the three months ended ~~September 30, 2015,~~March 31, 2016, total interest income ~~decreased~~increased on a fully tax equivalent basis (as adjusted for the tax benefit derived from tax-exempt assets) by ~~$37,000,~~$908,000, to ~~$4,399,000~~$5,210,000 from ~~$4,436,000,~~$4,302,000, for the three months ended ~~September 30, 2014. Although~~March 31, 2015. The increase was attributable to higher total interest-earning assets, which increased ~~2.8%~~$86,729,000, or 21.4%, due to ~~$412,058,000, for~~ the ~~third quarter of 2015, rate compression caused the~~Citizens merger. The yield on interest earning assets decreased to ~~decline to 4.24%~~4.27% for the three months ended ~~September 30, 2015~~March 31, 2016 from ~~4.39%~~4.32% for the three months ended ~~September 30, 2014.~~March 31, 2015.

Total interest expense ~~decreased $41,000,~~increased $56,000, or ~~8.1%~~11%, to ~~$463,000~~$565,000 for the three months ended ~~September 30, 2015~~March 31, 2016 from ~~$504,000~~$509,000 for the three months ended ~~September 30, 2014.~~March 31, 2015. This ~~decrease~~increase was attributable to ~~a five basis point decline in~~higher total interest-bearing liabilities, which increased $82,902,000, or 24.1%, due to the Citizens’ merger. The cost of funds ~~which decreased~~declined to 0.53% for the ~~third~~three months ended March 31, 2016 from 0.60% for the three months ended March 31, 2015. The decrease was due to a decline in interest rates paid on deposits and borrowings in comparing the first quarter of ~~2015 from 0.58% for~~2016 with the ~~same period in 2014. The decline in the cost~~first quarter of funds offset the $2,124,000, or 0.6 %, increase in the volume of average interest-bearing liabilities. In addition, there was a shift within interest-bearing liabilities, with total interest bearing deposits, which bear a higher cost of funds, declining, while short-term borrowings and non interest demand deposits increased.2015.

Net interest income calculated on a fully tax equivalent basis ~~decreased~~increased to ~~$3,936,000~~$4,645,000 for the three months ended ~~September 30, 2015~~March 31, 2016 from ~~$3,932,000~~$3,793,000 for the three months ended ~~September 30, 2014.~~March 31, 2015. Riverview’s net interest spread ~~decreased~~increased to ~~3.71%~~3.74% for the three months ended ~~September 30, 2015~~March 31, 2016 from ~~3.81%~~3.72% for the three months ended ~~September 30, 2014,~~March 31, 2015, while its net interest margin ~~decreased to 3.79%~~remained at 3.80% for the three months ended ~~September 30, 2015 from 3.89% for~~March 31, 2016 as compared with the three months ended ~~September 30, 2014. The decrease in the yield on interest-earning assets negatively impacted the net interest spread and margin.~~

The following table presents the Company’s average balances, interest rates, interest income and expense, interest rate spread and net interest margin, adjusted to a fully-tax equivalent basis (a non-GAAP financial measurement), for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and September 30, 2014:

~~Tax-exempt income is presented on a fully tax-equivalent basis assuming a tax rate of 34%.~~

~~For yield computation purposes, non-accruing loans are included in average loan balances and any income recognized on these loans is included in interest income.~~

~~Securities held as available-for-sale are carried at amortized cost for purposes of calculating average yield.~~

For the nine months ended September 30, 2015, total interest income decreased on a fully tax equivalent basis (as adjusted for the tax benefit derived from tax-exempt assets) by $877,000, to $13,025,000 from $13,902,000, for the nine months ended September 30, 2014. While total interest-earning assets increased $12,671,000, or 3.2%, the total yield on earning assets declined 43 basis points to 4.26% for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 from 4.69% for the first nine months of 2014. Total interest

income for the first nine months of 2014 was higher than normal due to the one-time recovery of loan interest income in the amount of $770,000. If this one-time recovery was excluded, total interest income as of September 30, 2014 would have been $13,132,000 as compared with interest income of $13,025,000 as of September 30,March 31, 2015. While yields declined for most of the interest-earning assets for the nine months ended September 30, 2015, the one-time recovery of loan interest income had the impact of inflating total interest income and yield for the nine months ended September 30, 2014.

Total interest expense decreased $132,000, to $1,476,000, for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 from $1,608,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2014. This decrease was attributable to a 6 basis-point decline in total cost of funds, which decreased to 0.57% for the period ended September 30, 2015 from 0.63% for the period ended September 30, 2014. The decline in the cost of funds offset the 1.5% increase in the volume of total average interest bearing liabilities. Riverview achieved a lower cost of funds by replacing higher fixed rate borrowings with the FHLB with short-term borrowings from the FHLB that have a lower interest rate. Further contributing to lower cost of funds was a $5,752,000 decline in interest bearing deposits and an increase of $5,731,000 in non-interest bearing demand deposits.

Net interest income calculated on a fully tax equivalent basis decreased $745,000, to $11,549,000, for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 from $12,294,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2014. Riverview’s net interest spread decreased to 3.69% for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 from 4.06% for the nine months ended September 30, 2014, while its net interest margin also decreased to 3.77% for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 from 4.15% for the nine months ended September 30, 2014. The decrease in cost of funds helped to offset some of the interest rate compression on the asset side of the balance sheet, which was further mitigated by the increased volume of total earning assets.

The provision for loan losses represents management’s determination of the amount necessary to be charged to operations in order to maintain the allowance for loan losses at a level that represents management’s best estimate of the known and inherent losses in the existing loan portfolio. Credit exposures deemed uncollectible are charged against the allowance for loan losses. Recoveries of previously charged-off loans are credited to the allowance for loan losses. Management performs periodic evaluations of the allowance for loan losses with consideration given to historical, internal and external factors. In evaluating the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses, management considers historical loss experience, delinquency trends and charge-off activity, status of past due and non-performing loans, growth within the portfolio, the amount and types of loans comprising the loan portfolio, adverse situations that may affect a borrower’s ability to pay, the estimated value of underlying collateral, peer group information and prevailing economic conditions. This evaluation is inherently subjective as it requires estimates that are caused to undergo interpretation and possible revision as events occur or as more information becomes available. Loans are also reviewed for impairment based on discounted cash flows using the loans’ initial effective interest rates or the fair value of the collateral for certain collateral dependent loans as provided under the accounting standard relating toAccounting by Creditors for Impairment of a Loan.

After an evaluation of these factors, noa provision of $99,000 was recorded for the three months ended ~~September 30, 2015, resulting in a total~~March 31, 2016 as compared with no provision ~~of $450,000~~recorded for the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2015. ~~This compares with a $126,000~~The higher provision recorded during ~~both~~ the ~~three and nine months ended September 30, 2014. The higher provision during the nine months ended September 30, 2015~~first quarter of 2016 as compared with the same period in ~~2014,~~2015 was driven primarily by an ~~increased specific allocation for impaired loans~~increase in the historical loss factor due ~~primarily~~ to the charge-off of one large commercial loan ~~to a business that became impaired during the second quarter,~~and an increase in the unallocated portion of the ~~allowance, increased historical loss ratios in certain commercial real estate pools and the application of the loss ratios to certain pools of acquired Union Bank and Trust Company loans.~~allowance. The allowance for loan losses was ~~$3,994,000,~~$3,717,000, or ~~1.13%~~0.93% of total loans outstanding, at ~~September 30, 2015,~~March 31, 2016, as compared with ~~$3,792,000,~~$4,365,000, or ~~1.11%~~1.07% of total loans, at December 31, ~~2014,~~2015, and ~~$3,501,000,~~$3,735,000, or ~~1.06%~~1.07% of total loans, at ~~September 30, 2014.~~March 31, 2015.

Management assesses the allowance for loan losses on a quarterly basis and makes provisions for loan losses, if necessary, in order to maintain the adequacy of the allowance. Management believes the allowance for loan losses at ~~September 30, 2015 is maintained at a level that is~~March 31, 2016 was adequate to absorb probable and potential losses inherent in the loan portfolio. Notwithstanding this belief, management continues to allocate dedicated resources to continue to manage at-risk credits.

The following table sets forth changes in non-interest income for the three months ended ~~September 30, 2015~~March 31, 2016 and ~~2014.~~


Non-Interest Income
	Three Months Ended September 30,												Three Months Ended March 31,
				Increase/(Decrease)												Increase/(Decrease)
(Dollars in thousands)	2015			Amount			%			2014			2016			Amount			%			2015
Service charges on deposit accounts	$	104		($	10	)		(8.7	%)	$	114		$	111		$	13			13.3	%	$	98
Other service charges and fees		140			(48	)		(25.5	%)		188			165			28			20.4	%		137
Earnings on cash value of life insurance		42			(29	)		(40.8	%)		71			82			31			60.8	%		51
Fees and commissions from securities brokerage		201			(17	)		(7.8	%)		218			177			(32	)		(15.3	%)		209
Gain (loss) on sale of available for sale securities		11			(124	)		(91.9	%)		135			(2	)		(2	)		(100.0	%)		—
Gain (loss) on sale and valuation of other real estate owned		(25	)		53			67.9	%		(78	)		6			32			123.1	%		(26	)
Gain on other assets		1			1			100.0	%		—
Gain on sale of mortgage loans		111			47			73.4	%		64			78			—			—			78

	$	585		($	127	)		(17.8	%)	$	712		$	617		$	70			12.8	%	$	547

Non-interest income continues to be an important source of income for the Company, representing 13.3% of total revenues (comprised of net interest income and non-interest income) for the third quarter of 2015 as compared with 15.7% for the third quarter of 2014. Non-interest income decreased 17.8% in comparing the financial results for the third quarter of 2015 with the results for the same period in 2014. A substantial portion of the decrease in non-interest income was attributable to recording lower gains from the sale of available for sale securities during the third quarter of 2015 as compared with the third quarter of 2014.

~~The following table sets forth changes in non-interest income for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014.~~

~~Non-interest income represented 12.8%~~12% of total revenues (comprised of net interest income and non-interest income) for the first ~~nine months~~quarter of ~~2015~~2016 as compared with ~~13.8%~~12.8% for the first ~~nine months~~quarter of ~~2014. Total~~2015. Non-interest income increased 12.8% in comparing the financial results for the first quarter of 2016 with the results for the same period in 2015. A substantial portion of the increase in non-interest income was 13.4% lower at September 30, 2015 as compared with September 30, 2014. Included in other services charges and fees for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 was a one-time entry for $229,000 relatingattributable to the restoration of a Union Bank purchased loan that was previously charged off, which made up a majority of the $249,000 decrease period over period. Losses, totaling $30,000, recorded during 2015 related to the sale or call of available for sale securities further added to the decrease in non-interest income year over year. The 2015 amount compares to gains of $182,000 recorded during 2014. These items were partially offset by increased gains on the sale of mortgage loans in 2015,additional earnings from life insurance as well as ~~lower losses on~~service charges and fee income associated with the ~~sale and valuation~~deposit accounts acquired as part of ~~other real estate owned.~~the Citizens’ merger.

The following table presents the components of non-interest expense for the three months ended ~~September 30, 2015~~March 31, 2016 and ~~2014.~~


	Three Months Ended September 30,
Non-Interest Expense
			Increase/(Decrease)								Three Months Ended March 31,
(Dollars in thousands)	2015		Amount			%			2014				Increase/(Decrease)
											2016		Amount			%			2015
Salaries and employee benefits	$	1,765	($	102	)		(5.5	%)	$	1,867	$	2,151	$	73			3.5	%	$	2,078
Occupancy expense		633		298			89.0	%		335		381		(55	)		(12.6	%)		436
Equipment expense		161		6			3.9	%		155		172		11			6.8	%		161
Telecommunications and processing charges		314		5			1.6	%		309		347		54			18.4	%		293
Postage and office supplies		83		(12	)		(12.6	%)		95		102		14			15.9	%		88
FDIC premium		81		(12	)		(12.9	%)		93		120		52			76.5	%		68
Bank shares tax expense		86		30			53.6	%		56		105		20			23.5	%		85
Directors’ compensation		186		15			8.8	%		171		90		4			4.7	%		86
Professional services		67		(42	)		(38.5	%)		109		93		(75	)		(44.6	%)		168
Amortization of intangibles		72		(2	)		(2.9	%)		70		77		10			14.9	%		67
Other expenses		201		(111	)		(35.6	%)		312		483		155			47.3	%		328

	$	3,649	$	77			2.2	%	$	3,572	$	4,121	$	263			6.8	%	$	3,858

Non-interest expenses increased ~~2.2%~~6.8% in the ~~third~~first quarter of ~~2015~~2016 in comparison to the same period in ~~2014.~~2015. The increase quarter over quarter was ~~marginal and was~~mostly attributable to the ~~impact~~inclusion of three months of Citizens’ expenses following completion of the ~~restructuring~~merger in 2015, particularly higher salaries and ~~efficiency~~benefits, equipment, telecommunications, FDIC premium, bank shares tax and other general types of expenses. The increased expenses of 2016 were tempered by the strategic cost-savings initiatives ~~that were recorded~~completed during ~~the second quarter~~2015. Occupancy expenses decreased 12.6% as of 2015. These initiatives included the departure of the former CEO, which resulted in lower salary expenses in the third quarter of 2015. In addition to the branch closure announced in the second quarter of 2015, Riverview decided to close two Bank offices in the Schuylkill County area due to the purchase of a building within the area that will be used to house the departments that currently occupy the office spaces that will be closed. These branch and office closures resulted in increased occupancy expenses in the third quarter ofMarch 31, 2016 as compared with March 31, 2015 due to the payment of lease termination fees of $84,000, accelerating leasehold improvement expense of $120,000, and the recording of a $98,000 expense based upon an estimate for the restoration of the Bank branch that was closed.

~~The following table presents the components of non-interest expense for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014.~~

Non-interest expenses increased $2,773,000, or 25.7%, in comparing the first nine months of 2015 with the same period in 2014. While non-interest expenses, in general, increased because of the Bank’s growth, the majority of the period to period increase was directly attributable to restructuring and other efficiency initiatives implemented in the second quarter of 2015 involving:

Income tax expense was ~~$142,000~~$174,000 for the ~~third~~first quarter of ~~2015,~~2016, as compared with income tax expense of ~~$182,000~~$28,000 for the ~~third~~first quarter of ~~2014.~~2015. The ~~decline~~increase in the ~~third~~first quarter tax provision was attributable to ~~there being less~~higher net income before tax expense for the ~~third~~first quarter of ~~2015~~2016 as compared with the ~~third~~first quarter of ~~2014.~~

For the nine months ended September 30, 2015, the tax benefit was $749,000, compared to a $741,000 tax expense for the nine months ended September 30, 2014. The decline in the 2015 tax accrual was attributable to a before tax net loss of $1,097,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2015, as compared with before tax net income of $2,952,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2014.2015.

Financial Condition as of ~~September 30, 2015~~March 31, 2016 and December 31, ~~2014~~2015

The following table sets forth the composition of the investment securities portfolio as of ~~September 30, 2015~~March 31, 2016 and December 31, ~~2014:~~2015:


	Amortized Cost as of
	March 31, 2016		December 31, 2015
U.S. Government agencies and sponsored enterprises (GSEs) - residential:
Mortgage-backed securities		24,565		25,942
Collateralized mortgage obligations (CMOs)		1,659		1,741
Corporate debt obligations		7,991		7,989
Equity securities, financial services		470		471

	$	72,110	$	75,151

Since ~~year end 2014,~~year-end 2015, total investment securities ~~have increased~~decreased as a result of ~~purchases which offset~~ security sales, calls, ~~maturities,~~ and repayments. None of the mortgage-backed securities in the portfolio are private label, ~~rather they~~but are comprised of residential mortgage pass-through securities either guaranteed or issued by the Federal National Mortgage Association (“FNMA”) or the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (“FHLMC”). Securities issued by these agencies contain additional guarantees that make them among the most creditworthy investments available.

No securities are considered other-than-temporarily impaired based on management’s evaluation of the individual securities, including the extent and length of any unrealized losses, the Company’s ability to hold the securities until maturity or until the fair values recover, and management’s opinion that it will not have to sell the securities prior to recovery of value. The Company invests in securities for the cash flow and yields they produce and not to profit from trading. The Company holds no trading securities in its portfolio, and the portfolio did not contain high risk securities or derivatives as of ~~September 30, 2015~~March 31, 2016 or December 31, ~~2014.~~2015.

The Bank’s investment in restricted stocks reflects a required investment in the common stock of correspondent banks, consisting of Atlantic Central Bankers Bank and the Federal Home Loan Bank of Pittsburgh (“FHLB”). These stocks have no readily available market values and are carried at cost since they are not actively traded. Management evaluates restricted stock for impairment based upon its assessment of the ultimate recoverability of the cost rather than by recognizing temporary declines in value. Management believes no impairment charge is necessary with regard to such restricted stock investments.

The loan portfolio comprises the major component of the Company’s earning assets and is the highest yielding asset category. The following table presents the composition of the total loan portfolio at ~~September 30, 2015~~March 31, 2016 and December 31, ~~2014:~~2015:


	September 30, 2015						December 31, 2014						March 31, 2016						December 31, 2015
(Dollars in thousands)	Balance			% of Total			Balance			% of Total			Balance			% of Total			Balance			% of Total
Commercial	$	42,393			12.03	%	$	37,301			10.88	%	$	45,420			11.31	%	$	46,076			11.24	%
Commercial real estate		203,235			57.69	%		199,782			58.29	%		208,720			51.99	%		205,500			50.14	%
Commercial land and land development		15,791			4.48	%		11,441			3.34	%		9,527			2.37	%		18,599			4.54	%
Residential real estate		71,012			20.16	%		73,453			21.43	%		115,282			28.71	%		117,669			28.71	%
Home equity lines of credit		17,134			4.86	%		18,235			5.34	%		18,047			4.50	%		17,437			4.26	%
Consumer installment		2,743			0.78	%		2,481			0.72	%		4,486			1.12	%		4,564			1.11	%

Total loans		352,308			100.00	%		342,693			100.00	%		401,482			100.00	%		409,845			100.00	%
Allowance for loan losses		(3,994	)					(3,792	)					(3,717	)					(4,365	)

Total loans, net	$	348,314					$	338,901					$	397,765					$	405,480

~~Since the 2014 year end, there has been modest growth in the loan portfolio.~~ At ~~September 30, 2015,~~March 31, 2016, total loans receivable (net of the allowance for loan losses, unearned fees and origination costs) ~~amounted to $348,314,000, an increase~~were $397,765,000, a decrease of ~~$9,413,000,~~$7,715,000, or ~~2.8%~~1.9%, as compared with ~~$338,901,000~~$405,480,000 as of December 31, ~~2014.~~2015. The decrease in total loans was attributable primarily to an increase in ~~the loan portfolio was attributable to continuing growth~~participations sold in the commercial ~~and commercial~~ real estate ~~portfolios, particularly in~~portfolio and the ~~Berks/Schuylkill market.~~payoff of a large commercial construction loan.

Partially offsetting new loans recorded during the first ~~nine~~three months of ~~2015,~~2016 were scheduled loan payments and increased prepayments and payoffs that impacted loan growth. In addition, the Bank originated mortgage loans which it continued to sell to Freddie Mac on a service released basis. The decision to sell mortgage loans was generally based upon the Bank’s relationship with the customer, with further consideration given to the interest rate environment, interest rate risk and overall economic conditions.

Loans receivable, net of the allowance for loan losses, represented ~~77.1%~~73.5% of total assets and ~~92.0%~~87.3% of total deposits as of ~~September 30, 2015,~~March 31, 2016, as compared to ~~77.7%~~73.8% and ~~91.0%~~90.4%, respectively, at December 31, ~~2014.~~2015. All of the Bank’s loans are to domestic borrowers.

The Bank focuses its lending activities on making loans to small and medium sized businesses, entrepreneurs, professionals and consumers in our primary market area. Our lending activities consist of commercial loans, commercial real estate loans, commercial land and land development loans, residential real estate loans, home equity lines of credit, and consumer installment loans. Riverview also makes residential real estate loans which are sold to Freddie Mac with servicing rights released.

The Bank has established a comprehensive lending policy, which includes rigorous underwriting standards for all types of loans. Our lending staff follows pricing guidelines established periodically by our management team. In an effort to manage risk, individual lending officer lending authorities are relatively low. All credit requests in excess of an individual lending officer’s authority, up to $750,000, are approved by dual signature of two of the following officers: Chief Executive Officer, President, Chief Credit Officer, Chief Lending Officer and President – Berks Region. Credit requests in excess of $750,000 are approved by the majority vote of a Loan Committee, consisting of the Chief Executive Officer, President, Chief Credit Officer, Chief Lending Officer and six members of the Bank’s Board of Directors. Credit requests in excess of $2,000,000 are approved by a majority vote of the entire Board of Directors. Management believes that the Bank employs experienced lending officers, requires appropriate collateral, carefully assesses the repayment ability of all borrowers and adequately monitors both the financial condition of our borrowers and the concentration of loans in the portfolio.

As of ~~September 30, 2015,~~March 31, 2016, the Bank’s legal lending limit for loans to one borrower was ~~$5,739,000.~~$5,715,000. As part of our risk management strategy, we may attempt to participate a portion of larger loans to other financial institutions. This strategy allows the Bank to maintain customer relationships while reducing credit exposure. However, this strategy may not always be available.

In addition to the normal repayment risks, all loans in the portfolio are subject to the state of the economy and the related effects on the borrower and/or real estate market. Longer term loans have periodic interest rate adjustments and/or call provisions. Senior management monitors the loan portfolio closely to promptly identify past due loans and attempt to address potential problem loans early.

The Bank also retains an outside, independent firm to review the loan portfolio. This firm performs a detailed annual review. We use the results of the firm’s report to validate our internal loan risk ratings and we review their commentary on specific loans and on our loan administration activities in order to improve our operations.

The Bank’s commercial loans consist of revolving and non- revolving lines of credit, term loans, equipment loans, standby letters of credit and unsecured loans. We originate commercial loans to established businesses for any legitimate business purpose, including the financing of machinery, equipment, leasehold improvements, inventory, carrying accounts receivable, general working capital and acquisition activities. We have a diverse customer base, and we have no concentration in these types of loans in any specific industry segment. We generally secure commercial business loans with accounts receivable, equipment, real estate and other collateral such as marketable securities, cash value of life insurance and time deposits at the Bank.

Commercial business loans generally have a higher degree of risk. These loans typically involve higher average balances, increased difficulty in monitoring and a higher risk of default since repayment primarily depends on the successful operation of the borrower’s business. To help manage this risk, we typically limit these loans to proven businesses, and we obtain appropriate collateral and personal guarantees from the principal owners of the business. We monitor the financial condition of the business by requiring submission of periodic financial statements and annual tax returns.

The Bank finances both owner occupied and non-owner occupied commercial real estate for its customers. Our underwriting policies and process focus on the customer’s ability to repay the loan as well as an assessment of the underlying real estate collateral. We originate commercial real estate loans on a fixed rate or floating rate basis. Fixed rates typically are committed for a three to five year time period, after which the rate will become floating unless an additional fixed rate period is negotiated. Repayment terms include amortization schedules from three years to a maximum of 25 years, with the majority of loans amortized over 15 to 20 years. Principal and interest payments are due monthly, with all remaining unpaid principal and interest due at maturity.

Risks inherent in managing a commercial real estate portfolio relate to sudden or gradual declines in property values as well as changes in the economic climate that may detrimentally impact the borrower’s ability to repay. We attempt to mitigate risk by carefully underwriting these loans. Our underwriting includes a cash flow analysis which is conducted by thoroughly examining leases and building operating expenses. A minimum debt coverage ratio of 1.2:1.0 is generally required. The character of the borrower and current and prospective conditions in the market are considered. We generally limit loans in this category to a maximum loan to value ratio of 80%, and require personal guarantees of the principal owners and/or corporate guarantees. We monitor the financial condition and operating performance of these borrowers by a thorough review of annual tax returns, property operating data and periodic financial statements.

The Bank’s commercial land and land development loan portfolio consists of funds advanced for construction of multifamily housing, commercial buildings, single family homes and site acquisition and development. This segment is relatively small compared to most other portfolios of the Bank. All of these loans are concentrated in our primary market area and the Bank is highly selective in making loans in this segment.

Construction and site acquisition and development lending entails significant risks. These loans generally involve large loan balances concentrated with single borrowers with funds advanced upon the security of the land or the project under construction. The value of the project is estimated prior to completion of construction, thus it is more difficult to accurately evaluate the total funds required to complete a project and related loan to value ratios. To mitigate risk, we generally limit construction loans to the lesser of 80% of cost or appraised value. Loan to value ratios for site acquisition and development loans is limited to 75%. A first lien position on the property is required. These loans are offered only to experienced builders and commercial entities or individuals who have demonstrated the ability to successfully and profitably complete these types of projects. Loans for multifamily and commercial buildings are typically made with the intent that upon completion of construction, the loan will convert to a permanent loan with the Bank. Loans for site acquisition and development are structured so that all funds advanced for the project are repaid upon the sale of not more than 75% of the total available lots in the development. A complete analysis of borrower and the project is performed, including a review of costs to construct, cash flow available to support the required interest payments during construction, the feasibility of the project based on market conditions, the borrower’s liquidity and ability to absorb any cost overruns, and, in the case of multifamily and commercial buildings, an assessment of the borrower’s ability to repay the loan on an amortizing basis upon completion of construction. Advances for construction are made based on work completed in accordance with budget and subject to inspection by the Bank.

The Bank offers a fixed and adjustable rate residential real estate secured loans to homeowners in our primary market area. These loans are made for the purchase or refinance of a borrower’s primary or secondary residence. These loans also include home equity installment loans granted for a variety of purposes. Our customer base is geographically diverse, reducing our potential risk. The loans are secured with a security interest in the borrower’s primary or secondary residence with a loan to value ratio of no more than 80%. Our underwriting includes an analysis of the borrower’s debt to income ratio which generally may not exceed ~~40%~~43%, collateral value, length and stability of employment and prior credit history. We do not originate, nor do we have, any subprime residential real estate loans.

The Bank offers variable rate residential real estate secured revolving lines of credit to homeowners. These home equity lines of credit are made to individuals in our primary market area. Our customer base is geographically diverse, reducing our potential risk. The loans are secured with a security interest in the borrower’s primary or secondary residence with a required loan to value limit of no more than 80%. Our underwriting includes an analysis of the borrower’s debt to income ratio which generally may not exceed ~~40%~~43%, collateral value, length and stability of employment and prior credit history.

The Bank offers various types of secured and unsecured consumer purpose installment loans. Consumer purpose non-real estate secured lines of credit also fall into this category. Our underwriting includes an analysis of the borrower’s debt to income ratio which generally may not exceed 40% (35% for unsecured loans), collateral value if any, length and stability of employment and prior credit history. These consumer loans may present greater credit risk than residential real estate loans because some are unsecured or

secured by rapidly depreciating assets. Repossessed collateral for a defaulted consumer loan may not provide an adequate source of repayment of the outstanding loan balance because of the greater likelihood of damage, loss or depreciation. Consumer loan collections depend on the borrower’s continuing financial stability. If a borrower suffers personal financial difficulty, the loan may not be repaid. Also, various federal and state laws, including bankruptcy laws, may limit the amount that can be recovered on such loans.

In summary, the Bank takes a balanced approach to its lending activities and manages risk associated with its loan portfolio by maintaining diversification within the portfolio, consistently applying prudent underwriting standards, ongoing monitoring efforts with attention to portfolio dynamics and mix, and procedures that are consistently applied and updated on an annual basis. The Bank contracts with an independent third party each year to conduct a credit review of the loan portfolio to provide an independent assessment of asset quality through, among other things, an evaluation of how the established underwriting criteria ~~used~~in applied in originating credits. Separately, every loan booked and every loan ~~turndown~~application turned down undergoes a review for conformity with established policies and compliance with ~~current regulatory~~ lending laws. The Bank has not ~~relaxed~~maintained its loan underwriting criteria ~~during this time,~~across its portfolio, and management believes its underwriting standards ~~continue to remain~~are conservative.

The following table presents non-performing loans and assets as of ~~September 30, 2015~~March 31, 2016 and December 31, ~~2014:~~2015:


Non-Performing Assets
(Dollars in thousands)
Non-Performing Assets (Dollars in thousands)
	September 30, 2015			December 31, 2014			March 31, 2016			December 31, 2015
Accruing loans past due 90 days	$	1,020		$	643		$	199		$	89
Non-accrual loans		3,744			4,245			1,949			3,182

Total non-performing loans		4,764			4,888			2,148			3,271
Foreclosed real estate		1,057			1,022			1,043			885

Total non-performing assets	$	5,821		$	5,910		$	3,191		$	4,156

Non-performing loans to total loans		1.35	%		1.43	%		0.54	%		0.80	%
Non-performing assets to total assets		1.29	%		1.36	%		0.59	%		0.76	%
Allowance to non-performing loans		83.84	%		77.58	%		173.04	%		133.45	%

The non-performing asset ratios presented in the table above reflect ~~little change~~improvement in the credit quality of the loan portfolio since December 31, ~~2014.~~2015. During the first ~~nine~~three months of ~~2015,~~2016, the Bank experienced a decrease of ~~$124,000~~$1,123,000 in total non-performing loans attributable to a decrease in non-accrual loans of $1,233,000, partially offset by an increase in accruing loans past due 90 days of ~~$377,000, offset by a decrease of $501,000 in non-accrual loans.~~$110,000. The decrease in non-accrual loans was primarily the result of the ~~return to accrual status~~charge-off of ~~four loans, payoff of three loans,~~one large commercial loan, and the transfer to foreclosed real estate of six loans and charge off of two loans, offset by the addition of six loans to non-accrual status. Each of the loans that returned to accruing status had been performing and paying as agreed for a period in excess of the time limits established by

~~Bank policy for return to accrual status.~~one commercial real estate loan. The ~~$89,000~~$965,000 decrease in total non-performing assets as of ~~September 30, 2015~~March 31, 2016 as compared with December 31, ~~2014~~2015 was attributable to a ~~$124,000~~$1,123,000 decrease in non-performing loans ~~and~~partially offset by a ~~$35,000~~$158,000 increase in foreclosed real estate. Management continues to be vigilant in its efforts to identify, evaluate and minimize credit risk and potential losses. Management is proactive in addressing and managing risk appropriate to the level of loan volume and delinquencies in the loan portfolio through its implementation of an enhanced credit administration ~~process—~~process - including a structured loan collection process and close monitoring of compliance with underwriting and loan to value guidelines.

The Bank had ~~$1,057,000~~$1,043,000 in real estate acquired through foreclosure as of ~~September 30, 2015,~~March 31, 2016, as compared with ~~$1,022,000~~$885,000 as of December 31, ~~2014.~~2015. The foreclosed real estate as of ~~September 30, 2015~~March 31, 2016 consisted of ~~four~~three mixed use properties totaling ~~$305,000, one~~$271,000, three commercial ~~property~~properties totaling ~~$231,000, two~~$403,000, three single family residential properties totaling ~~$145,000~~$105,000 and three parcels of vacant land totaling ~~$376,000.~~$264,000. The increase in foreclosed real estate at ~~September 30, 2015~~March 31, 2016 from December 31, ~~2014~~2015 was due to the addition of two commercial properties totaling $197,000, and one residential single family property totaling $71,000, offset by the sale of one ~~residential development property totaling $707,000, and the sale of five~~ single family residential ~~properties totaling $269,000, offset by the addition of one commercial~~ property totaling ~~$231,000, three mixed use properties totaling $259,000,~~$95,000, and the write down of two single family residential properties, totaling ~~$145,000, and three parcels of vacant land totaling $376,000.~~$15,000. Each of the foreclosed properties has been marked to the appropriate realizable value, and, at this time, no material loss is anticipated upon the ultimate sale of these assets.

A loan concentration is considered to exist when the total amount of loans to any one or multiple number of borrowers engaged in similar activities or with similar economic characteristics, exceeds 10% of loans outstanding.

The following table presents loan concentrations as of ~~September 30, 2015~~March 31, 2016 and December 31, ~~2014.~~2015.


(Dollars in thousands)	September 30, 2015		December 31, 2014		March 31, 2016		December 31, 2015
Loans to Lessors of:
Residential buildings and dwellings	$	50,294	$	51,248	$	50,846	$	50,773
Nonresidential buildings		65,558		56,626		61,132		68,535

Although the loans listed above were not made to any one particular borrower or industry, the quality of these loans could be affected by the region’s economy and overall real estate market. The performance of these portfolios continues to be ~~acceptable, with no losses for the quarter.~~acceptable.

Demand for office space and residential apartment space was solid in ~~2014~~2015 in the Bank’s market area. This level of demand ~~has~~ continued through the ~~third~~first quarter of ~~2015.~~2016. Absorption rates of available space continue to be positive and occupancy and rental rates have become increasingly more stable. As such, management does not believe that this concentration is an adverse condition to the Bank at this time.

The Bank’s lending policy is executed through the assignment of tiered loan limit authorities to individual officers of the Bank and the Board of Directors. Although the Bank maintains sound credit policies, certain loans may deteriorate for a variety of reasons. The Bank’s policy is to place all loans in a non-accrual status upon becoming 90 days delinquent in payments, unless the loan is well secured and there is documented, reasonable expectation of the collection of the delinquent amount. Loans are reviewed daily as to their status. Management is not aware of any potentially material loan problems that have not been disclosed in this report.

As a result of management’s ongoing assessment as to the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses in consideration of the risks and trends associated with the loan portfolio, the Bank ~~did not record~~recorded a provision ~~to the allowance for loan losses~~of $99,000 for the three months ended ~~September 30, 2015 and recorded a~~March 31, 2016, as compared with no provision ~~of $450,000~~ for ~~the nine months ended September 30, 2015. For 2014, we recorded a provision of $126,000 for both~~ the three months ~~and nine months~~ ended ~~September 30, 2014.~~March 31, 2015. Management determined that the total of the allocated and unallocated allowance for loan losses was adequate to absorb any losses inherent in the portfolio. Although management believes that it uses the best information available to make such determinations, future adjustments to the allowance for loan losses may be necessary, and the results of operations could be significantly and adversely affected if circumstances differ substantially from the assumptions used in making these determinations. Because future events affecting borrowers and collateral cannot be predicted with certainty, there can be no assurance that the existing allowance for loan losses is adequate or that material increases will not be necessary should the quality of the loans deteriorate as a result of factors previously discussed.

The ~~increase~~decrease in the allowance for loan losses as a percentage of total loans as of ~~September 30, 2015~~March 31, 2016 as compared with ~~September 30, 2014 primarily reflected an increased specific allocation for impaired loans~~March 31, 2015 was due primarily to the charge off of one large commercial loan and the addition of Citizens loans with no corresponding allowance for loan losses. Despite this slight decline, management believes that the March 31, 2016 allowance for loan losses to ~~a business that became impaired during~~total loans is adequate given the ~~second quarter, an increase~~improvement in the ~~unallocated portion~~credit quality of the ~~allowance, increased historical loss ratios in certain commercial real estate pools and the application of loss rations to certain pools of acquired Union Bank loans.~~loan portfolio. Although management is proactive in identifying and dealing with credit issues that it can control, it anticipates that, going forward, additional provisions to its allowance for loan losses may be warranted as a result of factors the Bank cannot control.

Deposits are the major source of the Bank’s funds for lending and investing purposes. Total deposits at ~~September 30, 2015~~March 31, 2016, were ~~$378,735,000,~~$455,504,000, an increase of ~~$6,473,000,~~$7,162,000, or ~~1.7%~~1.6%, from total deposits of ~~$372,262,000~~$448,342,000 at December 31, ~~2014. There~~2015. The increase in total deposits was ~~a shift in~~attributable to opportunities created by significant disruption through multiple in-market competitor acquisitions, where Riverview was able to attract and meet the deposit mix since December 31, 2014, as time deposits decreased $10,009,000 and other interest bearing deposits increased $16,082,000. In addition, noninterest bearing deposits increased $400,000 since December 31, 2014. As a resultneeds of the low interest rate environment, the Bank’s cost of funds associated with interest bearing deposits declined to 0.57% at September 30, 2015 from 0.62% at December 31, 2014 and 0.63% at September 30, 2014.displaced customers.

Short-term borrowings are generally used to meet temporary funding needs and consist of federal funds purchased, securities sold under agreements to repurchase, and overnight and short-term borrowings from the Federal Home Loan Bank of Pittsburgh (“FHLB”). As of ~~September 30, 2015,~~March 31, 2016, short-term borrowings totaled ~~$23,333,000,~~$25,000,000, all of which were borrowed under the Bank’s Open Repo Plus line with the FHLB. This level of short-term borrowings compared with ~~$12,500,000~~$42,575,000 in outstanding short-term borrowings at December 31, ~~2014,~~2015, all of which were borrowed under the Bank’s FHLB Open Repo Plus line.

Long-term borrowings totaled ~~$7,350,000~~$11,400,000 at ~~September 30, 2015~~March 31, 2016 as compared with ~~$7,000,000~~$9,350,000 outstanding at December 31, ~~2014,~~2015, and are summarized as follows:

At ~~September 30, 2015,~~March 31, 2016, shareholders’ equity for the Company totaled ~~$36,720,000, a decrease~~$42,978,000, an increase of ~~$1,488,000~~$675,000 as compared with shareholder equity of ~~$38,208,000~~$42,303,000 at December 31, ~~2014.~~2015. The ~~decrease~~increase was due to aafter tax net ~~loss~~income of ~~$348,000,~~$753,000, the payment of dividends of ~~$1,118,000, and a decrease~~$442,000, an increase in the net unrealized gains/losses on securities available for sale, which net of tax, ~~decreased~~increased equity by ~~$75,000,~~$336,000, and ~~was offset by an increase~~increases to surplus of ~~$23,000~~$11,000 to reflect the compensation cost associated with option grants and ~~$30,000~~$17,000 representing the proceeds of shares issued under the Company’s Employee Stock Purchase Plan.

The Company meets the eligibility criteria of a small bank holding company in accordance with the Federal Reserve Board’s Small Bank Holding Company Policy Statement. Accordingly, the Company is exempt from certain regulatory requirements administered by the federal banking agencies. However, the Bank is still subject to various regulatory capital adequacy requirements administered by the Federal Reserve Board. On January 1, 2015, the Basel III capital rules became effective for the Bank. The table that follows presents the Bank’s capital ratios as determined and reported to its regulator. The Bank’s capital ratios exceed both the regulatory minimums and the requirements necessary for designation as a “well-capitalized” institution under the new Basel III rules.


	September 30, 2015			December 31, 2014			Regulatory Minimum			“Well Capitalized” Requirement			March 31, 2016			December 31, 2015			Regulatory Minimum (before 2016 Conservation Buffer)			“Well Capitalized” Requirement			Regulatory Minimum (with 2016 Conservation Buffer)
Tier 1 capital (to average assets)		7.8	%		8.0	%		4.0	%		5.0	%		7.4	%		7.2	%		4.0	%		5.0	%		4.0	%
Tier 1 capital (to risk-weighted assets)		9.7	%		10.3	%		6.0	%		8.0	%		10.2	%		9.6	%		6.0	%		8.0	%		6.625	%
Total risk-based capital (to risk-weighted assets)		10.8	%		11.5	%		8.0	%		10.0	%		11.1	%		10.7	%		8.0	%		10.0	%		8.625	%
Common equity tier 1 risk based capital (to risk-weighted assets)		9.7	%		n/a			4.5	%		6.5	%		10.2	%		9.6	%		4.5	%		6.5	%		5.125	%

The ratios presented ~~do not~~for March 31, 2016 reflect additional ~~future~~ Basel III requirements, including ~~a 2.5%~~the transitional capital conservation buffer ~~that will apply~~phase-in of 0.625% applied to the minimum regulatory capital ratios ~~beginning~~ in 2016, ~~through~~with full implementation of a 2.5% conservation buffer by 2019. The buffer phase-in was not applicable to the December 31, 2015 capital ratios, since it became effective in 2016.

Banking laws and regulations limit the ability of the Bank to transfer cash to the Company in the form of dividends, loans or advances. Regulatory approval is required if the total of all dividends declared by a state bank in any calendar year exceeds net profits (as defined) for that year combined with the retained net profits for the two preceding years. At ~~September 30, 2015, $759,000~~March 31, 2016, $812,000 of undistributed earnings of the Bank, included in consolidated shareholders’ equity, was available for distribution to the Company as dividends without prior regulatory approval.

The following table presents the details of quarterly cash dividends paid to the Company’s shareholders during the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September 30, 2015~~March 31, 2016 as compared with the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September 30, 2014:~~March 31, 2015:

During March 2011, the Company approved and implemented a Dividend Reinvestment and Stock Purchase Plan (the “DRP Plan”). The Plan enables registered shareholders to automatically reinvest all or a portion of their cash dividends into the purchase of additional common shares of the Company. Shareholders enrolled in the Plan also have the option to make voluntary cash contributions to the Plan on a quarterly basis in order to purchase additional shares of common stock. A 5% discount is applied to the purchase price of all shares purchased by the Plan. Shares purchased by the DRP Plan are made in open market or privately negotiated transactions (or a combination of both), and are administered by the Company’s transfer agent. The Company does not offer or sell any of its authorized but unissued shares to the DRP, and therefore does not receive any proceeds from the purchase of common stock by this Plan.

In June 2014, the Board of Directors and shareholders of the Company approved an Employee Stock Purchase Plan (“ESPP”), giving eligible employees the opportunity to purchase common stock at a 15% discount from the market price. A total of 75,000 shares were reserved for the issuance under the ESPP. Shares to be issued by the ESPP, which are administered by the Company’s transfer agent, may either be acquired from the open market or privately negotiated transactions, or may be issued from authorized but unissued shares. In the event ESPP shares are issued from authorized but unissued shares, the Company would receive the proceeds from the purchase of such common stock. During the first ~~nine~~three months of ~~2015,~~2016, the Company issued ~~2,418~~1,383 shares ~~acquired~~ from authorized but unissued shares under the ESPP for a total of ~~$30,000,~~$17,000, which was recorded as an increase to the surplus account. During the quarter ended March 31, 2015, the Company did not issue any authorized / unissued shares for the ESPP.

In addition to the authorized but unissued shares reserved for the ESPP, a total of 75,000 shares were reserved for issuance under the Riverview Financial Corporation 401(k) Retirement Plan (“401(k) Plan”). During ~~2015,~~2016, no shares were issued ~~under the~~by Riverview to 401(k) Plan ~~reserve.~~participants.

The Company is party to financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk in the normal course of business to meet the financing needs of its customers. These financial instruments include commitments to extend credit, and to a lesser extent, letters of credit. At ~~September 30, 2015,~~March 31, 2016, the Company had unfunded outstanding commitments to extend credit of ~~$47,569,000~~$47,558,000 and outstanding letters of credit of ~~$3,299,000.~~$3,330,000. Because these commitments generally have fixed expiration dates and many will expire without being drawn upon, the total commitment level does not necessarily represent future cash requirements. Refer to Note 12 of the ~~2014~~2015 Consolidated Financial Statements for a discussion of the nature, business purpose and importance of the Company’s off-balance sheet arrangements.

Interest rate risk is the exposure of a bank’s current and future earnings and capital arising from adverse movements in interest rates. Interest rate risk can create exposure for the Bank in two primary areas. Changes in rates may have an impact on the Bank’s liquidity position, and movements in interest rates can create fluctuations in net interest income and changes in the economic value of equity.

The Bank employs various management techniques and analytical tools to monitor and minimize its exposure to interest rate risk. The guidelines used by the Bank are designed to limit exposure to changes in interest rates that affect the underlying economic value of assets and liabilities, earnings and capital. The Asset/Liability Committee (“ALCO Committee”), consisting of key financial and senior management personnel and directors, meets on a quarterly basis. The ALCO Committee is responsible for reviewing the interest rate sensitivity position of the Bank, approving asset and liability management policies and overseeing the formulation and implementation of strategies regarding balance sheet positions, liquidity and earnings.

The ALCO Committee examines the extent to which the Bank’s assets and liabilities are interest rate sensitive and reviews a variety of strategies that project changes in asset or liability mix and the impact of those changes on projected net interest income. The Committee also reviews the interest rate sensitivity gap, which is the difference between interest earning assets and interest bearing liabilities scheduled to mature or re-price within specific time periods using flat rates as a base and rising and declining rates. A positive gap occurs when the amount of interest sensitive assets exceed the amount of interest sensitive liabilities, while a negative gap occurs when the amount of interest sensitive liabilities exceed the amount of interest sensitive assets. During a period of declining interest rates, a negative gap position tends to result in an increase in net interest income, while a positive gap in that particular rate environment tends to adversely affect net interest income. If re-pricing of assets and liabilities were equally flexible and moved concurrently, the impact of any increase or decrease in interest rates on net interest income would be minimal.

The Bank’s balance sheet at ~~September 30, 2015~~March 31, 2016 was positively gapped, which suggests that the net yield on interest earning assets may increase during periods of rising rates. However, a simple interest rate gap analysis alone may not be an accurate indicator of how changes in interest rates will affect net interest income. Changes in interest rates may not uniformly affect income associated with interest earning assets and costs associated with interest bearing liabilities. In addition, the magnitude and duration of changes in interest rates may have a significant impact on net interest income. Although certain assets and liabilities may have similar maturities or periods of re-pricing, they may react differently to changes in market interest rates. Interest rates on certain types of assets and liabilities fluctuate in advance of changes in general market interest rates, while interest rates on other types may lag behind changes in general market rates. In the event of a change in interest rates, customer behavior or competition, prepayments and early withdrawal levels could also deviate from those assumed in evaluating the interest rate gap.

Liquidity refers to the Company’s ability to generate adequate amounts of cash to meet financial obligations to its customers in order to fund loans, to respond to deposit outflows and to cover operating expenses. Maintaining a level of liquid funds through asset/liability management seeks to ensure that these needs are met at a reasonable cost. Liquidity is essential to compensate for fluctuations in the balance sheet and provide funds for growth and normal operating expenditures. Sources of liquidity are provided on a continuous basis through scheduled and unscheduled principal reductions and interest payments on outstanding loans and investment securities. Liquidity needs may also be met by converting assets into cash or obtaining sources of additional funding, whether through deposit growth, securities sold under agreements to repurchase, borrowings under lines of credit with correspondent banks or raising additional capital.

Liquidity from the asset category is provided through cash, amounts due from banks, interest-bearing deposits with banks and federal funds sold, which totaled ~~$15,253,000~~$25,339,000 at ~~September 30, 2015,~~March 31, 2016, and was ~~$319,000 lower~~$2,651,000 higher than the ~~$15,572,000~~$22,688,000 that was outstanding at December 31, ~~2014.~~2015. While liquidity sources generated from assets include scheduled payments and prepayments of principal and interest from securities and loans in the Company’s portfolios, longer-term liquidity needs may be met by selling securities available-for-sale, selling loans or raising additional capital. At ~~September 30, 2015,~~March 31, 2016, there was ~~$5,064,000~~$22,190,000 of unpledged available-for-sale securities readily available for sale for liquidity purposes as compared with ~~$555,000~~$22,811,000 at December 31, ~~2014. The increase in the volume of unpledged securities was attributable to the increase in the amount of investment securities since the 2014 year-end.~~2015.

On the liability side, the primary source of funds available to meet liquidity needs is deposits. The Bank’s core deposits, which exclude certificates of deposit over $250,000, were ~~$370,529,000~~$445,465,000 at ~~September 30, 2015~~March 31, 2016 as compared to ~~$365,137,000~~$440,776,000 at December 31, ~~2014.~~2015. Core deposits have historically provided a source of relatively stable and low cost liquidity. Short-term and long-term borrowings utilizing the federal funds line and credit facilities established with a correspondent financial institution and the FHLB are also considered to be reliable sources for funding. As of ~~September 30, 2015,~~March 31, 2016, the Bank had access to two formal borrowing lines with its correspondent banks totaling ~~$164,720,000,~~$156,721,000, net of the aggregate amounts outstanding on these lines totaling ~~$28,333,000~~$30,000,000 in the form of short-term and long-term borrowings. In addition to the Bank’s borrowing capacity, Riverview has a $2,000,000 secured term loan and a $5,000,000 secured guidance line of credit available from ACNB Bank, with ~~$350,000~~$4,400,000 in outstanding ~~draws~~borrowings as of ~~September 30, 2015~~March 31, 2016 and ~~none~~$2,350,000 as of December 31, ~~2014.~~2015.

There are a number of factors that may impact the Company’s liquidity position. Changes in interest rates, local economic conditions and the competitive marketplace can influence prepayments on investment securities, loan fundings and payments, and deposit flows. Management is of the opinion that its liquidity position at ~~September 30, 2015~~March 31, 2016 was adequate to respond to fluctuations “on” and “off” the balance sheet since it manages liquidity on a daily basis and expects to have sufficient funds to meet all of its funding requirements.

Except as discussed above, there are no known demands, trends, commitments, events or uncertainties that may result in, or that are reasonably likely to result in the Company’s inability to meet anticipated or unexpected needs.

The impact of inflation upon financial institutions can affect assets and liabilities through the movement of interest rates. The exact impact of inflation on the Company is difficult to measure. Inflation may cause operating expenses to change at a rate not matched by the change in earnings. Inflation may affect the borrowing needs of consumer and commercial customers, in turn affecting the growth of the Company’s assets. Inflation may also affect the level of interest rates in the general market, which in turn can affect the Company’s profitability and the market value of assets held. The Company actively manages its interest rate sensitive assets and liabilities, to attempt to counter the effects of inflation.

I~~TEM~~ ~~3. QUANTITATIVEAND~~ Q~~UALITATIVE~~ D~~ISCLOSURES~~ A~~BOUT~~ M~~ARKET~~ R~~ISK~~

As of ~~September 30, 2015,~~March 31, 2016, the Company carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of the Company’s management, including its Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Accounting Officer), of the effectiveness of the design and the operation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act) as of ~~September 30, 2015,~~March 31, 2016, pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 15d-15. Disclosure controls and procedures are controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the

Company’s reports filed or submitted under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms. These controls and procedures include, without limitations, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by an issuer in the reports that it files under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to the issuer’s management, including its principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding disclosure. Based upon the evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer along with the Chief Financial Officer (Principal Accounting Officer) concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report.

It should be noted that any system of controls, however well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable and not absolute assurance that the objectives of the system are met. In addition, the design of any control system is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events. Because of these and other inherent limitations of control systems, there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential conditions, regardless of how remote.

There have been no changes in the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting that occurred during the most recent fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

In the opinion of the Company, after review with legal counsel, there are no proceedings pending to which the Company is a party or to which its property is subject, which, if determined adversely to the Company, would be material in relation to the Company’s consolidated financial condition. There are no proceedings pending other than ordinary, routine litigation incident to the business of the Company. In addition, no material proceedings are pending or are known to be threatened or contemplated against the Company by governmental authorities.

The following Exhibits are filed as part of this filing on Form 10-Q, or incorporated by reference hereto:



3.2		Amended and Restated Bylaws of Riverview Financial Corporation. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3(ii) to Riverview’s Current Report on Form 8-K (Registration No. 333-188193 filed March 4, 2015.)

21.1		Subsidiaries of Registrant.

31.1		Section 302 Certification of the Chief Executive Officer (Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a)).



31.2		Section 302 Certification of the Chief Financial Officer (Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a)).

32.1		Chief Executive Officer’s §1350 Certification (Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b)/15d-14(b)).

32.2		Chief Financial Officer’s §1350 Certification (Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b)/15d-14(b)).

101		Interactive Data File (XBRL).

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.


		PAGE

PART I.	Financial Information

Item 1.	Financial Statements:

	Consolidated Balance Sheets at ~~September 30, 2015~~March 31, 2016 (unaudited) and December 31, ~~2014~~2015		3

	Consolidated Statements of Income for the Three ~~and Nine~~ Months Ended ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2016 and 2015 ~~and 2014~~ (unaudited)		4

	Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the Three ~~and Nine~~ Months Ended ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2016 and 2015 ~~and 2014~~ (unaudited)		5

	Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity for the ~~Nine~~Three Months Ended ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2016 and 2015 ~~and 2014~~ (unaudited)		65

	Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the ~~Nine~~Three Months Ended ~~September 30, 2015~~March 31, 2016 and ~~2014 (unaudited)~~2015(unaudited)		76

	Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements		97

Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations		3833

Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk		5446

Item 4.	Controls and Procedures		5446

PART II.	Other Information

Item 1.	Legal Proceedings		5547

Item 1A.	Risk Factors		5547

Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds		5547

Item 3.	Defaults Upon Senior Securities		5547

Item 4.	Mine Safety Disclosures		5547

Item 5.	Other Information		5547

Item 6.	Exhibits		5547

SIGNATURES			5749

Exhibit Index			5850


	Three Months Ended March 31,
(In thousands)	2016			2015
Cash Flows from Operating Activities
Net income	$	753		$	374
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:
Depreciation		175			154
Provision for loan losses		99			—
Granting of stock options		11			8
Net amortization of premiums on securities available for sale		138			108
Net (gain) loss from write-down or sale of foreclosed real estate and other assets		(6	)		26
Net loss on sale of securities – available for sale		2			—
Accretion of purchase adjustment on loans		(115	)		(49	)
Amortization of intangible assets		77			67
Deferred income taxes		186			(76	)
Proceeds from sale of mortgage loans		4,769			3,993
Net gain on sale of mortgage loans		(78	)		(78	)
Mortgage loans originated for sale		(4,191	)		(4,115	)
Earnings on cash value of life insurance, net		(82	)		(51	)
Increase in accrued interest receivable and other assets		(502	)		(179	)
Decrease in accrued interest payable and other liabilities		(846	)		(499	)

Net Cash Provided by (Used in) Operating Activities		390			(317	)

Cash Flows from Investing Activities
Net maturities of interest bearing time deposits		1			—
Securities available for sale:
Purchases		(1,038	)		—
Proceeds from maturities, calls and principal repayments		1,845			1,463
Proceeds from sales		2,095			—
Proceeds from the sale of foreclosed real estate		724			244
Net (increase) decrease in restricted investments in bank stock		719			(460	)
Net (increase) decrease in loans		6,855			(7,203	)
Purchases of premises and equipment		(151	)		(209	)

Net Cash Provided by (Used in) Investing Activities		11,050			(6,165	)

Cash Flows from Financing Activities
Net increase in deposits		7,162			633
Increase (decrease) in short-term borrowings		(17,575	)		9,500
Proceeds from long-term debt		2,050			—
Payment of capital lease		—			(1,655	)
Proceeds from issuance of common stock		17			—
Dividends paid		(442	)		(373	)

Net Cash Provided by (Used in) Financing Activities		(8,788	)		8,105

Net Increase in Cash and Cash Equivalents		2,652			1,623
Cash and Cash Equivalents - Beginning		21,697			14,580

Cash and Cash Equivalents - Ending	$	24,349		$	16,203

Supplemental Disclosures of Cash Flows Information
Interest paid	$	534		$	509

Income taxes paid	$	—		$	—

Supplemental Schedule of Noncash Investing and Financing Activities
Other real estate acquired in settlement of loans	$	876		$	369


	Nine Months Ended September 30,
(In thousands)	2015			2014
Cash Flows from Operating Activities
Net income (loss)	($	348	)	$	2,211
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:
Depreciation		780			495
Provision for loan losses		450			126
Granting of stock options		23			16
Net amortization of premiums on securities available for sale		326			298
Net realized loss from write-down or sale of foreclosed real estate and other assets		144			313
Net realized (gain) loss on sale or calls of securities available for sale		30			(182	)
Amortization of intangible assets		206			218
Deferred income taxes		(473	)		234
Amortization of deferred income		—			31
Proceeds from sale of mortgage loans		18,607			9,059
Net gain on sale of mortgage loans		(305	)		(213	)
Mortgage loans originated for sale		(18,086	)		(10,214	)
Earnings on cash value of life insurance, net		(167	)		(172	)
(Increase) decrease in accrued interest receivable and other assets		(638	)		27
Increase (decrease) in accrued interest payable and other liabilities		1,306			(365	)

Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities		1,855			1,882

Cash Flows from Investing Activities
Net maturities of interest bearing time deposits		1			251
Securities available for sale:
Purchases		(11,007	)		(11,046	)
Proceeds from maturities, calls and principal repayments		5,502			6,304
Proceeds from sales		—			4,423
Proceeds from the sale of foreclosed real estate		956			133
Net increase in restricted investments in bank stock		(476	)		(317	)
Net increase in loans		(10,998	)		(6,735	)
Purchases of premises and equipment		(1,036	)		(3,482	)
Purchase of life insurance		(28	)		(26	)

Net Cash Used in Investing Activities		(17,086	)		(10,495	)

Cash Flows from Financing Activities
Net increase (decrease) in deposits		6,473			(7,559	)
Increase in short-term borrowings		10,833			10,684
Repayment of long-term debt		(5,000	)		(3,000	)
Proceeds from long-term debt		5,350			—
Payment of capital lease		(1,655	)		—
Exercise of option		—			53
Issuance of common stock to ESPP		30			—
Dividends paid		(1,118	)		(1,102	)

Net Cash Provided by (Used in) Financing Activities		14,913			(924	)

Net Decrease in Cash and Cash Equivalents		(318	)		(9,537	)
Cash and Cash Equivalents - Beginning		14,580			24,062

Cash and Cash Equivalents - Ending	$	14,262		$	14,525


	Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2015		2014
	(In thousands)
Supplemental Disclosures of Cash Flows Information
Interest paid	$	1,516	$	1,614

Income taxes paid	$	275	$	510

Supplemental Schedule of Noncash Investing and Financing Activities
Other real estate acquired in settlement of loans	$	1,135	$	353


	Three Months Ended September 30,						Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2015			2014			2015			2014
	(In thousands)
Net income (loss)	$	622		$	659		($	348	)	$	2,211
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax:
Unrealized gains and losses on securities available for sale:
Net unrealized gains (losses) arising during the period, net of tax of $79 and $18 for the three months ended and ($49) and $541 for the nine months ended		153			36			(95	)		1,050
Reclassification adjustment for (gains) losses included in net income, net of tax of ($4) and ($46) for the three months ended and $10 and ($62) for the nine months ended		(7	)		(89	)		20			(120	)

Total other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax		146			(53	)		(75	)		930

Total comprehensive income (loss)	$	768		$	606		($	423	)	$	3,141


	Three Months Ended March 31,
(In thousands)	2016		2015
	(In thousands)
Net income	$	753	$	374
Other comprehensive income, net of tax:
Unrealized gains and losses on securities available for sale:
Net unrealized gains arising during the period, net of tax of ($173) and ($45)		334		86
Reclassification adjustment for losses included in net income		2		—

Net change in unrealized gains		336		86

Total other comprehensive income, net of tax		336		86

Total comprehensive income	$	1,089	$	460


(In thousands, except share data)	Common Stock		Surplus		Retained Earnings			Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)			Total Shareholders’ Equity
Balance – January 1, 2015	$	22,077	$	201	$	15,795		$	135		$	38,208
Net income		—		—		374			—			374
Other comprehensive income		—		—		—			86			86
Compensation cost of option grants		—		8		—			—			8
Cash dividends, $0.1375 per share		—		—		(373	)		—			(373	)

Balance – March 31, 2015	$	22,077	$	209	$	15,796		$	221		$	38,303

Balance – January 1, 2016	$	22,077	$	6,784	$	13,550		($	108	)	$	42,303
Net income		—		—		753			—			753
Other comprehensive income		—		—		—			336			336
Compensation cost of option grants		—		11		—			—			11
Issuance of 1,383 shares of common stock to ESPP		—		17		—			—			17
Cash dividends, $0.1375 per share		—		—		(442	)		—			(442	)

Balance – March 31, 2016	$	22,077	$	6,812	$	13,861		$	228		$	42,978


	December 31, 2014						Three Months Ended September 30, 2014				Nine Months Ended September 30, 2014
(In thousands)	Recorded Investment in Impaired Loans		Unpaid Principal Balance of Impaired Loans		Related Allowance		Average Recorded Investment in Impaired Loans		Interest Income Recognized		Average Recorded Investment in Impaired Loans		Interest Income Recognized
Loans with no related allowance recorded:
Commercial	$	1,193	$	1,193	$	—	$	1,065	$	11	$	1,029	$	34
Commercial real estate:
Non-owner occupied		1,893		1,893		—		1,902		25		1,905		76
Owner occupied		904		904		—		1,032		23		1,078		69
1-4 family investment		857		857		—		947		10		1,004		30
Commercial land and land development		215		215		—		215		—		215		—
Residential real estate		1,834		1,834		—		1,760		24		1,780		71
Home equity lines of credit		774		774		—		762		4		761		13

	$	7,670	$	7,670	$	—	$	7,683	$	97	$	7,772	$	293

Loans with an allowance recorded:
Commercial real estate:
Non-owner occupied	$	141	$	141	$	50	$	48	$	1	$	16	$	2
Owner occupied		282		282		22		—		—		—		—
1-4 family investment		191		191		5		330		—		185		—
Residential real estate		124		124		5		125		3		126		8

	$	738	$	738	$	82	$	503	$	4	$	327	$	10

Total
Commercial	$	1,193	$	1,193	$	—	$	1,065	$	11	$	1,029	$	34
Commercial real estate:
Non-owner occupied		2,034		2,034		50		1,950		26		1,921		78
Owner occupied		1,186		1,186		22		1,032		23		1,078		69
1-4 family investment		1,048		1,048		5		1,277		10		1,189		30
Commercial land and land development		215		215		—		215		—		215		—
Residential real estate		1,958		1,958		5		1,885		27		1,906		79
Home equity lines of credit		774		774		—		762		4		761		13

	$	8,408	$	8,408	$	82	$	8,186	$	101	$	8,099	$	303


(In thousands)	Recorded Investment in Impaired Loans		Unpaid Principal Balance of Impaired Loans		Related Allowance		Average Recorded Investment in Impaired Loans		Interest Income Recognized
December 31, 2015:
Loans with no related allowance recorded:
Commercial	$	994	$	994	$	—	$	1,018	$	28
Commercial real estate:
Non-owner occupied		2,163		2,163		—		2,178		78
Owner occupied		1,462		1,462		—		999		100
1-4 family investment		879		879		—		892		29
Residential real estate		2,526		2,644		—		2,325		122
Home equity lines of credit		400		400		—		445		11

		8,424		8,562		—		7,857		368
Loans with an allowance recorded:
Commercial		793		1,193		700		663		21
Commercial real estate:
Non-owner occupied		24		155		1		8		4
1-4 family investment		186		193		7		190		—
Residential real estate		121		121		7		123		5

		1,124		1,662		715		984		30
Total
Commercial		1,787		2,187		700		1,681		49
Commercial real estate:
Non-owner occupied		2,187		2,318		1		2,186		82
Owner occupied		1,462		1,462		—		999		100
1-4 family investment		1,065		1,072		7		1,082		29
Residential real estate		2,647		2,785		7		2,448		127
Home equity lines of credit		400		400		—		445		11

	$	9,548	$	10,224	$	715	$	8,841	$	398


	Three Months Ended September 30, 2015						Nine Months Ended September 30, 2015
(In thousands, except contracts data)	Number of Contracts		Pre-Modification Outstanding Recorded Investment		Post- Modification Outstanding Recorded Investment		Number of Contracts		Pre-Modification Outstanding Recorded Investment		Post- Modification Outstanding Recorded Investment
Troubled Debt Restructurings:
Commercial real estate:
Owner occupied		—	$	—	$	—		1	$	149	$	149
Residential real estate		—		—		—		3	$	473	$	473

	Number of Contracts		Recorded Investment				Number of Contracts		Recorded Investment
Troubled Debt Restructurings That Subsequently Defaulted:
Commercial real estate:
Owner occupied		1	$	148				1	$	148
Residential real estate		1		10				1		10


(In thousands, except contracts data)	Number of Contracts		Pre-Modification Outstanding Recorded Investment		Post-Modification Outstanding Recorded Investment
March 31, 2015:
Troubled Debt Restructurings:
Commercial real estate:
Owner occupied		1	$	149	$	149
Residential real estate		3		473		473


		Level 1:		Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets that are accessible at the measurement date for identical, unrestricted assets or liabilities.

		Level 2:		Quoted prices in markets that are not active, or inputs that are observable either directly or indirectly, for substantially the full term of the asset or liability.

		Level 3:		Prices or valuation techniques that require inputs that are both significant to the fair value measurement and unobservable (i.e., supported with little or no market activity).


Description	Balance		(Level 1) Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets		(Level 2) Significant Other Observable Inputs		(Level 3) Significant Unobservable Inputs
	(In thousands)
September 30, 2015:
U.S. Government agency securities	$	807	$	—	$	807	$	—
State and municipal		27,442		—		27,442		—
U.S. Government agencies and sponsored enterprises (GSEs) – residential:
Mortgage-backed securities		18,701		—		18,701		—
Collateralized mortgage obligations (CMOs)		1,909		—		1,909		—
Corporate debt obligations		4,509		—		4,509		—
Equity securities, financial services		485		485		—		—

Securities available-for- sale	$	53,853	$	485	$	53,368	$	—

December 31, 2014:
U.S. Government agency securities	$	817	$	—	$	817	$	—
State and municipal		23,708		—		23,708		—
U.S. Government agencies and sponsored enterprises (GSEs) – residential:
Mortgage-backed securities		20,902		—		20,902		—
Collateralized mortgage obligations (CMOs)		2,391		—		2,391		—
Corporate debt obligations		505		—		505		—
Equity securities, financial services		495		495		—		—

Securities available-for- sale	$	48,818	$	495	$	48,323	$	—


			Fair Value Measurements at September 30, 2015 Using:
(In thousands)	Carrying Amount		Fair Value		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
Financial assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	14,262	$	14,262	$	14,262	$	—	$	—
Interest-bearing time deposits		991		991		991		—		—
Investment securities		53,853		53,853		485		53,368		—
Loans, net		348,314		350,554		—		350,554		—
Accrued interest receivable		1,368		1,368		—		1,368		—
Restricted investments in bank stocks		1,478		1,478		—		—		1,478
Financial liabilities:
Deposits		378,735		375,788		—		375,788		—
Short-term borrowings		23,333		23,353		—		23,353		—
Long-term borrowings		7,350		7,354		—		7,354		—
Accrued interest payable		93		93		—		93		—
Off balance sheet financial instruments		—		—		—		—		—


	For the Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2015								2014
	Average Balance		Interest			Average Rate			Average Balance		Interest			Average Rate
Assets
Interest earning assets:
Securities:
Taxable	$	32,823	$	699			2.85	%	$	36,345	$	897			3.30	%
Tax-exempt		15,568		508			4.36	%		21,820		792			4.85	%

Total securities		48,391		1,207			3.33	%		58,165		1,689			3.88	%

Loans:
Consumer		2,242		85			5.07	%		1,948		94			6.45	%
Commercial		40,513		1,232			4.07	%		38,758		1,448			5.00	%
Real estate		307,028		10,399			4.53	%		285,991		10,611			4.96	%

Total loans		349,783		11,716			4.48	%		326,697		12,153			4.97	%

Other interest earning assets		11,034		102			1.24	%		11,675		60			0.69	%

Total earning assets		409,208		13,025			4.26	%		396,537		13,902			4.69	%

Non-interest earning assets		36,107								37,034

Total assets	$	445,315							$	433,571

Liabilities and shareholders’ equity
Interest-bearing liabilities:
Deposit accounts:
Interest-bearing demand	$	134,747	$	362			0.36	%		128,427		380			0.40	%
Savings		87,973		153			0.23	%		90,267		189			0.28	%
Time deposits		97,227		779			1.07	%		107,005		831			1.04	%

Total deposits		319,947		1,294			0.54	%		325,699		1,400			0.57	%

Borrowings:
Short-term borrowings		19,581		48			0.33	%		8,095		14			0.23	%
Long-term borrowings		6,528		134			2.72	%		7,099		194			3.65	%

Total borrowings		26,109		182			0.93	%		15,194		208			1.83	%

Total interest bearing liabilities		346,056		1,476			0.57	%		340,893		1,608			0.63	%

Demand deposits		56,622								50,891

Other liabilities		4,944								3,933

Shareholders’ equity		37,693								37,854

Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity	$	445,315							$	433,571

Net interest income (Non-GAAP)			$	11,549							$	12,294
Tax benefit on tax-exempt securities				(173	)							(269	)
Tax benefit on tax-exempt loans				(110	)							(63	)

Total tax-equivalent adjustment				(283	)							(332	)

Net interest income (GAAP)			$	11,266							$	11,962

Net interest spread							3.69	%							4.06	%

Net interest margin							3.77	%							4.15	%


	Fair Values as of
	September 30, 2015		December 31, 2014
Available-for-sale securities:
U.S. Government agencies securities	$	807	$	817
State and municipal		27,442		23,708
U.S. Government agencies and sponsored enterprises (GSEs) - residential:
Mortgage-backed securities		18,701		20,902
Collateralized mortgage obligations (CMOs)		1,909		2,391
Corporate debt obligations		4,509		505
Equity securities, financial services		485		495

	$	53,853	$	48,818


Analysis of the Allowance for Loan Losses (Dollars in thousands)
	Three Months Ended
	March 31, 2016			March 31, 2015
Beginning balance	$	4,365		$	3,792
Provision for loan losses		99			—
Charge-offs:
Commercial, financial, agricultural		723			—
Real estate commercial		24			39
Real estate mortgage		0			15
Installments		11			6

Total charge-offs		758			60

Recoveries:
Commercial, financial, agricultural		9			—
Real estate commercial		0			—
Real estate mortgage		1			—
Installments		1			3

Total recoveries		11			3

Net (charge-offs)/recoveries		(747	)		(57	)

Ending balance	$	3,717		$	3,735

Net (charge-offs)/recoveries to average loans (annualized)		(0.74	%)		(0.07	%)
Allowance for loan losses to total loans		0.93	%		1.07	%



2.1		Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated October 30, 2014, between Riverview Financial Corporation and The Citizens National Bank of Meyersdale. (Incorporated by reference to Annex A included in Riverview’s Registration Statement on Form S-4 (Registration No. 333-201017 filed December 17, 2014.)

3.1		Articles of Incorporation of Riverview Financial Corporation. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit D of Annex A included in Riverview’s Amendment No. 2 to Registration Statement on Form S-4 (Registration No. 333-188193 filed August 5, 2013.)


By:		/s/ Kirk D. Fox
		Kirk D. Fox
		Chief Executive Officer
		(Principal Executive Officer)

Date:		~~November~~May 13, ~~2015~~2016

By:		/s/ Theresa M. Wasko
		Theresa M. Wasko
		Chief Financial Officer
		(Principal Financial Officer)

Date:		~~November~~May 13, ~~2015~~2016


~~Exhibit~~ ~~No.~~ ExhibitNo.		Description

2.1		Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated October 30, 2014, between Riverview Financial Corporation and The Citizens National Bank of Meyersdale. (Incorporated by reference to Annex A included in Riverview’s Registration Statement on Form S-4 (Registration No. 333-201017 filed December 17, 2014.)

3.1		Articles of Incorporation of Riverview Financial Corporation. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit D of Annex A included in Riverview’s Amendment No. 2 to Registration Statement on Form S-4 (Registration No. 333-188193 filed August 5, 2013.)

3.2		Amended and Restated Bylaws of Riverview Financial Corporation. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3(ii) to Riverview’s Current Report on Form 8-K (Registration No. 333-188193 filed March 4, 2015.)

21.1		Subsidiaries of Registrant.

31.1		Section 302 Certification of the Chief Executive Officer (Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a)).

31.2		Section 302 Certification of the Chief Financial Officer (Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a)).

32.1		Chief Executive Officer’s §1350 Certification (Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b)/15d-14(b)).

32.2		Chief Financial Officer’s §1350 Certification (Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b)/15d-14(b)).

101		Interactive Data File (XBRL).

Large accelerated filer

Accelerated filer

Non-accelerated filer

Smaller reporting company