(Former name, former address and former fiscal year if changed since last report)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x☑ No ¨☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x☑ No ¨☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, ~~or a~~ smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated ~~filer”~~filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and ~~“smaller reporting~~“emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨☐ No x☑

As of August ~~2, 2016,~~4, 2017, the registrant had ~~74,992,196~~124,031,856 shares of common stock outstanding.


	Three Months Ended						Six Months Ended						Three Months Ended						Six Months Ended
	June 30, 2016			June 30, 2015			June 30, 2016			June 30, 2015			June 30, 2017			June 30, 2016			June 30, 2017			June 30, 2016
Revenues	$	548,350		$	445,945		$	1,058,535		$	873,314		$	577,070		$	548,350		$	1,127,684		$	1,058,535
Operating expenses		416,837			333,930			805,343			651,839			438,445			416,837			853,152			805,343
Depreciation and amortization		28,652			26,560			57,103			51,501			31,866			28,652			60,815			57,103
General and administrative expenses		36,904			32,174			70,965			64,022			52,206			36,904			94,792			70,965

Operating income		65,957			53,281			125,124			105,952			54,553			65,957			118,925			125,124
Interest income		5,902			2,868			10,459			4,941			12,346			5,902			24,323			10,459
Interest expense		(31,089	)		(26,651	)		(60,455	)		(51,297	)		(35,983	)		(31,089	)		(70,983	)		(60,455	)
Loss on extinguishment of debt		(15,866	)		—			(15,866	)		—			—			(15,866	)		—			(15,866	)

Income before income taxes and equity in earnings of affiliates		24,904			29,498			59,262			59,596			30,916			24,904			72,265			59,262
Provision for income taxes		3,879			2,369			7,030			5,196			1,400			3,879			3,870			7,030
Equity in earnings of affiliates, net of income tax provision of $728, $516, $1,199 and $1,128, respectively		2,131			1,124			3,250			2,610
Equity in earnings of affiliates, net of income tax provision of $597, $728, $1,208 and $1,199, respectively														1,426			2,131			2,913			3,250

Net income		23,156			28,253			55,482			57,010			30,942			23,156			71,308			55,482
Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interests		53			38			77			58			50			53			87			77

Net income attributable to The GEO Group, Inc.	$	23,209		$	28,291		$	55,559		$	57,068		$	30,992		$	23,209		$	71,395		$	55,559

Weighted-average common shares outstanding:
Basic		74,044			73,665			73,960			73,607			122,125			111,066			117,885			110,940
Diluted		74,319			73,903			74,254			73,894			122,895			111,479			118,702			111,381
Net income per common share attributable to The GEO Group, Inc.:
Basic:
Net income per common share attributable to The GEO Group, Inc. - basic	$	0.31		$	0.38		$	0.75		$	0.78
Net income per common share attributable to The GEO Group, Inc. – basic													$	0.25		$	0.21		$	0.61		$	0.50

Diluted:
Net income per common share attributable to The GEO Group, Inc. - diluted	$	0.31		$	0.38		$	0.75		$	0.77
Net income per common share attributable to The GEO Group, Inc. – diluted													$	0.25		$	0.21		$	0.60		$	0.50

Dividends declared per share	$	0.65		$	0.62		$	1.30		$	1.24		$	0.47		$	0.43		$	0.94		$	0.87

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited consolidated financial statements.


	Three Months Ended						Six Months Ended						Three Months Ended					Six Months Ended
	June 30, 2016			June 30, 2015			June 30, 2016			June 30, 2015			June 30, 2017		June 30, 2016			June 30, 2017		June 30, 2016
Net income	$	23,156		$	28,253		$	55,482		$	57,010		$	30,942	$	23,156		$	71,308	$	55,482
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax:
Foreign currency translation adjustments		(413	)		(287	)		1,101			(1,968	)		513		(413	)		2,206		1,101
Pension liability adjustment, net of tax provision of $20, $21, $41 and $42, respectively		33			40			65			77
Unrealized (loss) gain on derivative instrument classified as cash flow hedge, net of tax (provision) benefit of $391, $(869), $817 and $(150), respectively		(2,198	)		5,097			(4,642	)		1,017
Pension liability adjustment, net of tax provision of $25, $20, $51 and $41, respectively														64		33			111		65
Unrealized gain (loss) on derivative instrument classified as cash flow hedge, net of tax (provision) benefit of $(229), $391, $(144) and $817, respectively														1,295		(2,198	)		816		(4,642	)

Total other comprehensive (loss) income, net of tax		(2,578	)		4,850			(3,476	)		(874	)
Total other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax														1,872		(2,578	)		3,133		(3,476	)

Total comprehensive income		20,578			33,103			52,006			56,136			32,814		20,578			74,441		52,006
Comprehensive loss attributable to noncontrolling interests		52			43			68			81			51		52			85		68

Comprehensive income attributable to The GEO Group, Inc.	$	20,630		$	33,146		$	52,074		$	56,217		$	32,865	$	20,630		$	74,526	$	52,074

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited consolidated financial statements.


	June 30, 2016			December 31, 2015			June 30, 2017			December 31, 2016
	(Unaudited)						(Unaudited)
ASSETS
*Current Assets*
Cash and cash equivalents	$	38,865		$	59,638		$	65,901		$	68,038
Restricted cash and investments		72,453			8,489			17,378			17,133
Accounts receivable, less allowance for doubtful accounts of $4,092 and $3,088, respectively		297,253			314,097
Current deferred income tax assets		—			27,914
Accounts receivable, less allowance for doubtful accounts of $4,373 and $3,664, respectively								342,361			356,255
Contract receivable, current portion								238,958			224,033
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		29,072			28,208			42,467			32,210

Total current assets		437,643			438,346			707,065			697,669

*Restricted Cash and Investments*		22,536			20,236			23,020			20,848
*Property and Equipment, Net*		1,913,670			1,916,386			2,049,613			1,897,241
*Contract Receivable*		302,575			174,141
*Direct Finance Lease Receivable*		—			1,826
*Non-Current Deferred Income Tax Assets*		24,154			7,399
*Non-Current Contract Receivable*								358,727			219,783
*Deferred Income Tax Assets*								32,262			30,039
*Goodwill*		615,446			615,438			787,803			615,433
*Intangible Assets, Net*		214,023			224,148			268,345			203,884
*Other Non-Current Assets*		70,399			64,307			66,933			64,512

Total Assets	$	3,600,446		$	3,462,227		$	4,293,768		$	3,749,409

LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
*Current Liabilities*
Accounts payable	$	92,636		$	77,523		$	98,027		$	79,637
Accrued payroll and related taxes		50,533			48,477			63,192			55,260
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities		128,549			135,483			153,930			131,096
Current portion of capital lease obligations, long-term debt and non-recourse debt		17,150			17,141			255,404			238,065

Total current liabilities		288,868			278,624			570,553			504,058

*Non-Current Deferred Income Tax Liabilities*		—			11,471
*Other Non-Current Liabilities*		92,291			87,694			98,741			88,656
*Capital Lease Obligations*		8,075			8,693			6,787			7,431
*Long-Term Debt*		1,869,281			1,855,810			2,107,208			1,935,465
*Non-Recourse Debt*		374,434			213,098			283,780			238,842
*Commitments, Contingencies and Other* (Note 10)
*Commitments, Contingencies and Other* (Note 11)
*Shareholders’ Equity*
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value, 30,000,000 shares authorized, none issued or outstanding		—			—			—			—
Common stock, $0.01 par value, 125,000,000 shares authorized, 74,972,436 and 74,642,859 issued and outstanding, respectively		750			747
Common stock, $0.01 par value, 187,500,000 shares authorized, 123,976,106 and 112,547,544 issued and outstanding, respectively								1,240			1,125
Additional paid-in capital		885,497			879,599			1,180,038			891,993
Earnings in excess of distributions		117,108			158,796			73,299			112,763
Accumulated other comprehensive loss		(35,889	)		(32,404	)		(27,694	)		(30,825	)

Total shareholders’ equity attributable to The GEO Group, Inc.		967,466			1,006,738			1,226,883			975,056
Noncontrolling interests		31			99			(184	)		(99	)

Total shareholders’ equity		967,497			1,006,837			1,226,699			974,957

Total Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity	$	3,600,446		$	3,462,227		$	4,293,768		$	3,749,409

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited consolidated financial statements.


	Six Months Ended						Six Months Ended
	June 30, 2016			June 30, 2015			June 30, 2017			June 30, 2016
Cash Flow from Operating Activities:
Net income	$	55,482		$	57,010		$	71,308		$	55,482
Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interests		77			58			87			77

Net income attributable to The GEO Group, Inc.		55,559			57,068			71,395			55,559
Adjustments to reconcile net income attributable to The GEO Group, Inc. to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization expense		57,103			51,501			60,815			57,103
Stock-based compensation		6,489			5,578			9,993			6,489
Loss on extinguishment of debt		15,866			—			—			15,866
Amortization of debt issuance costs, discount and/or premium and other non-cash interest		5,027			3,216			7,676			5,027
Provision for doubtful accounts		1,170			323			1,227			1,170
Equity in earnings of affiliates, net of tax		(3,250	)		(2,610	)		(2,913	)		(3,250	)
Income tax deficiency (benefit) related to equity compensation		791			(651	)
Loss on sale/disposal of property and equipment		172			(745	)
Dividends received from unconsolidated joint venture								2,359			—
Income tax deficiency related to equity compensation								—			791
Loss on sale/disposal of property and equipment, net								1,909			172
Changes in assets and liabilities, net of effects of acquisitions:
Changes in accounts receivable, prepaid expenses and other assets		14,047			13,955			44,336			14,047
Changes in contract receivable		(124,273	)		(46,600	)		(122,006	)		(124,273	)
Changes in accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities		9,551			(1,237	)		(24,077	)		9,551

Net cash provided by operating activities		38,252			79,798			50,714			38,252

Cash Flow from Investing Activities:
Acquisition of LCS, cash consideration		—			(307,403	)
Acquisition of SoberLink, cash consideration		—			(24,402	)
Insurance proceeds - damaged property		548			901
Acquisition of CEC, net of cash acquired								(354,466	)		—
Insurance proceeds – damaged property								—			548
Proceeds from sale of property and equipment		43			123			648			43
Change in restricted cash and investments		(65,853	)		(5,417	)		(1,835	)		(65,853	)
Capital expenditures		(46,014	)		(71,694	)		(67,508	)		(46,014	)

Net cash used in investing activities		(111,276	)		(407,892	)		(423,161	)		(111,276	)

Cash Flow from Financing Activities:
Proceeds from long-term debt		641,000			518,000			1,158,574			641,000
Payments on long-term debt		(627,506	)		(134,744	)		(972,500	)		(627,506	)
Payments on non-recourse debt		(3,044	)		(4,513	)		(67,885	)		(3,044	)
Proceeds from non-recourse debt		159,068			49,731			91,076			159,068
Taxes paid related to net share settlements of equity awards		(2,257	)		(1,784	)		(4,092	)		(2,257	)
Proceeds from issuance of common stock under prospectus supplement								275,867			—
Proceeds from issuance of common stock in connection with ESPP		224			218			242			224
Debt issuance costs		(19,497	)		(2,438	)		(7,587	)		(19,497	)
Income tax (deficiency) benefit related to equity compensation		(791	)		651
Income tax deficiency related to equity compensation								—			(791	)
Proceeds from the exercise of stock options		2,057			2,037			6,150			2,057
Cash dividends paid		(97,247	)		(92,254	)		(110,859	)		(97,247	)

Net cash provided by financing activities		52,007			334,904			368,986			52,007
Effect of Exchange Rate Changes on Cash and Cash Equivalents		244			(1,103	)		1,324			244

Net (Decrease) Increase in Cash and Cash Equivalents		(20,773	)		5,707
Net Decrease in Cash and Cash Equivalents								(2,137	)		(20,773	)
Cash and Cash Equivalents, beginning of period		59,638			41,337			68,038			59,638

Cash and Cash Equivalents, end of period	$	38,865		$	47,044		$	65,901		$	38,865

Supplemental Disclosures:
Non-cash Investing and Financing activities:
Capital expenditures in accounts payable and accrued expenses	$	2,204		$	2,536		$	8,450		$	2,204

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited consolidated financial statements.

The GEO Group, Inc., a Florida corporation, and subsidiaries (the “Company” or “GEO”) is a fully-integrated real estate investment trust (“REIT”) specializing in the ownership, leasing and management of correctional, detention and reentry facilities and the provision of community-based services and youth services in the United States, Australia, South Africa and the United Kingdom. The Company owns, leases and operates a broad range of correctional and detention facilities including maximum, medium and minimum security prisons, immigration detention centers, minimum security detention centers, as well as community based reentry facilities and offers an expanded delivery of offender rehabilitation services under its ‘GEO Continuum of Care’ platform. The ‘GEO Continuum of Care’ program integrates enhanced in-prison programs, which are evidence-based and include cognitive behavioral treatment and post-release services, provides academic and vocational classes to life skills and treatment programs while helping individuals reintegrate into their communities. The Company develops new facilities based on contract awards, using its project development expertise and experience to design, construct and finance what it believes are state-of-the-art facilities that maximize security and efficiency. The Company provides innovative compliance technologies, industry-leading monitoring services, and evidence-based supervision and treatment programs for community-based parolees, probationers and pretrial defendants. The Company also provides secure transportation services for offender and detainee populations as contracted domestically and in the United Kingdom through its joint venture GEO Amey PECS Ltd. (“GEOAmey”). ~~The~~At June 30, 2017, after its acquisition of Community Education Centers (“CEC”) (Refer to Note 2 – Business Combinations), the Company’s worldwide operations include the management and/or ownership of approximately ~~87,000~~100,000 beds at ~~104~~143 correctional and detention facilities, including idle facilities, projects under development and recently awarded contracts, and also include the provision of community supervision services for more than ~~127,000~~185,000 offenders and ~~pre-trial~~pretrial defendants, including approximately ~~83,000~~100,000 individuals through an array of technology products including radio frequency, GPS, and alcohol monitoring devices.

In March 2017, the Company’s Board of Directors declared a 3-for-2 stock split of its common stock. The stock split was completed on April 24, 2017 with respect to shareholders of record on April 10, 2017. Outstanding share and per-share amounts disclosed for all periods presented have been retroactively adjusted to reflect the effects of the stock split. On April 24, 2017, the Company amended its articles of incorporation to increase the number of authorized shares of common stock to take into effect the stock split.

The Company’s unaudited consolidated financial statements included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States and the instructions to Form 10-Q and consequently do not include all disclosures required by Form 10-K. The accounting policies followed for quarterly financial reporting are the same as those disclosed in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February ~~26, 2016~~27, 2017 for the year ended December 31, ~~2015.~~2016. The accompanying December 31, ~~2015~~2016 consolidated balance sheet has been derived from those audited financial statements. Additional information may be obtained by referring to the Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, ~~2015.~~2016. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring items) necessary for a fair presentation of the financial information for the interim periods reported in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q have been made. Results of operations for the six months ended June 30, ~~2016~~2017 are not necessarily indicative of the results for the entire year ending December 31, ~~2016,~~2017, or for any other future interim or annual periods.

On April 5, 2017, the Company completed its acquisition of CEC, pursuant to a definitive merger agreement entered into on February 12, 2017 between the Company, GEO/DE/MC/01 LLC, and CEC Parent Holdings LLC. CEC is a private provider of rehabilitation services for offenders in reentry and in-prison treatment facilities as well as management services for county, state and federal correctional and detention facilities, CEC’s operations encompass over 12,000 beds nationwide. Under the terms of the merger agreement, the Company acquired 100% of the voting interests in CEC for $354.5 million, net of cash acquired of $3.0 million, in an all cash transaction, excluding transaction related expenses paid at closing of $4.1 million. At the time of the acquisition, approximately $115 million of CEC indebtedness, including accrued interest, was outstanding. All indebtedness of CEC was repaid by the Company with a portion of the $354.5 million merger consideration. Subsequently, the purchase price was reduced by $2.6 million as a result of the final working capital target settlement received by the Company in July 2017. Additionally, for tax periods ending on or prior to December 31, 2018, the purchase price may be adjusted for any tax benefits realized by the Company attributable to certain transaction tax deductions if such deductions are able to be taken by the Company and will result in an incremental tax benefit. The Company has estimated a maximum potential adjustment of approximately $1.9 million but has preliminarily estimated this contingency at zero at the acquisition date. The Company is still reviewing the various tax implications of the acquisition which may impact the ultimate fair value of this contingency.

GEO is identified as the acquiring company for US GAAP accounting purposes. Under the acquisition method of accounting, the purchase price for CEC was allocated to CEC’s net tangible and intangible assets based on their estimated fair values as of April 5, 2017, the date of closing and the date that the Company obtained control of CEC. In order to determine the fair values of certain tangible and intangible assets acquired, the Company engaged a third party independent valuation specialist. For all other assets acquired and liabilities assumed, the recorded fair value was determined by the Company’s management and represents an estimate of the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants.

The allocation of the purchase price for this transaction at April 5, 2017 has not been finalized. The primary areas of the preliminary purchase price allocations that are not finalized relate to the fair values of certain tangible assets and liabilities acquired, the valuation of certain intangible assets acquired and income taxes. The Company expects to continue to obtain information to assist in determining the fair value of the net assets acquired at the acquisition date during the measurement period. Measurement period adjustments that the Company determines to be material will be recorded in the reporting period in which the adjustment amounts are determined. The purchase price of $354.5 million has been preliminarily allocated to the estimated fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed as of April 5, 2017 as follows (in ‘000’s):

As shown above, the Company recorded $172.3 million of goodwill related to the purchase of CEC. The strategic benefit of the merger includes the Company’s ability to further position itself to meet the demand for increasingly diversified correctional, detention and community reentry facilities and services and will allow the Company to expand the delivery of enhanced in-prison rehabilitation including evidence-based treatment, integrated with post-release support services through GEO’s Continuum of Care platform. These factors contributed to the goodwill that was recorded upon consummation of the transaction. The Company does not believe that any of the goodwill recorded as a result of the CEC acquisition will be deductible for federal income tax purposes. Identifiable intangible assets purchased in the acquisition and their weighted average amortization periods in total and by major intangible asset class, as applicable, are included in the table below:

The results of operations of CEC are included in the Company’s results of operations from April 5, 2017. The following unaudited pro forma information combines the consolidated results of operations of the Company and CEC as if the acquisition had occurred at January 1, 2016, which is the beginning of the earliest period presented. The pro forma amounts are included for comparative purposes and may not necessarily reflect the results of operations that would have resulted had the acquisition been completed at the beginning of the applicable period and may not be indicative of the results that will be attained in the future (in thousands):

The unaudited pro forma combined financial information presented above is compiled from the financial statements of the combined companies and includes pro forma adjustments for: (i) estimated changes in depreciation expense, interest expense and amortization expense; (ii) adjustments to eliminate intercompany transactions; (iii) adjustments to remove $7.8 million and $10.4 million, for the three months and six months ended June 30, 2017, respectively, of non-recurring transaction and merger related costs directly related to the acquisition that are included in the combined companies’ financial results; and (iv) the income tax impact of the adjustments.The unaudited pro forma financial information does not include any adjustments to reflect the impact of cost savings or other synergies that may result from this acquisition. As noted above, the unaudited pro forma financial information does not purport to be indicative of the actual results that would have been achieved by the combined companies for the periods presented or that may be achieved by the combined companies in the future.

The Company has included revenue and earnings of $56.7 million and $2.6 million, respectively, in its consolidated statements of operations for both the three and six months ended June 30, 2017 for CEC activity since April, 5, 2017, the date of acquisition.

The Company has recorded goodwill as a result of its business combinations. On April 5, 2017, the Company completed its acquisition of CEC. Refer to Note 2 – Business Combinations. Goodwill is recorded as the difference, if any, between the aggregate consideration paid for an acquisition and the fair value of the tangible assets and intangible assets acquired net of liabilities assumed, including noncontrolling interests. Changes in the Company’s goodwill balances from December 31, ~~2015~~2016 to June 30, ~~2016~~2017 are as follows (in thousands):


	December 31, 2016		Acquisitions		Foreign Currency Translation		June 30, 2017
U.S. Corrections & Detention	$	277,774	$	43,086	$	—	$	320,860
GEO Care		337,257		129,257		—		466,514
International Services		402		—		27		429

Total Goodwill	$	615,433		172,343	$	27	$	787,803

The Company has also recorded other finite and indefinite-lived intangible assets as a result of its various business combinations. Refer to Note 2 – Business Combinations for a discussion of the Company’s recent acquisition of CEC. The Company’s intangible assets include ~~customer relationships,~~ facility management contracts, covenants not to compete, trade names and technology, as follows (in thousands):


	June 30, 2016									December 31, 2015							June 30, 2017									December 31, 2016
	Weighted Average Useful Life (years)		Gross Carrying Amount		Accumulated Amortization			Net Carrying Amount		Gross Carrying Amount		Accumulated Amortization			Net Carrying Amount		Weighted Average Useful Life (years)		Gross Carrying Amount		Accumulated Amortization			Net Carrying Amount		Gross Carrying Amount		Accumulated Amortization			Net Carrying Amount
Facility management contracts and customer relationships		15.6	$	233,076	$	(79,377	)	$	153,699	$	233,041	$	(71,538	)	$	161,503
Facility management contracts																		16.3	$	308,474	$	(96,345	)	$	212,129	$	233,136	$	(87,256	)	$	145,880
Covenants not to compete																		1		700		(167	)		533		—		—			—
Technology		7.3		33,700		(18,576	)		15,124		33,700		(16,255	)		17,445		7.3		33,700		(23,217	)		10,483		33,700		(20,896	)		12,804
Trade name (Indefinite lived)		Indefinite		45,200		—			45,200		45,200		—			45,200		Indefinite		45,200		—			45,200		45,200		—			45,200

Total acquired intangible assets			$	311,976	$	(97,953	)	$	214,023	$	311,941	$	(87,793	)	$	224,148			$	388,074	$	(119,729	)	$	268,345	$	312,036	$	(108,152	)	$	203,884

Amortization expense was $6.5 million and $11.6 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017, respectively. Amortization expense was $5.1 million and $10.2 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2016, ~~respectively. Amortization expense was $4.8 million and $9.1 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015,~~ respectively. Amortization expense was primarily related to the U.S. Corrections & Detention and GEO Care segments’ amortization of acquired facility management contracts. As of June 30, ~~2016,~~2017, the weighted average period before the next contract renewal or extension for the acquired facility management contracts was approximately 1.6 years. Although the facility management contracts acquired have renewal and extension terms in the near term, the Company has historically maintained these relationships beyond the current contractual periods.

Estimated amortization expense related to the Company’s finite-lived intangible assets for the remainder of ~~2016~~2017 through ~~2020~~2021 and thereafter is as follows (in thousands):


Fiscal Year	Total Amortization Expense		Total Amortization Expense
Remainder of 2016	$	10,160
2017		20,323
Remainder of 2017			$	13,102
2018		17,463		22,821
2019		17,135		22,310
2020		17,135		22,310
2021				20,090
Thereafter		86,607		122,512

	$	168,823	$	223,145

The following tables provide a summary of the Company’s significant financial assets and liabilities carried at fair value and measured on a recurring basis as of June 30, ~~2016~~2017 and December 31, ~~2015~~2016 (in thousands):


			Fair Value Measurements at June 30, 2016								Fair Value Measurements at June 30, 2017
	Carrying Value at June 30, 2016		Quoted Prices in Active Markets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)		Carrying Value at June 30, 2017		Quoted Prices in Active Markets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
Assets:
Restricted investment:
Rabbi Trust	$	14,973	$	—	$	14,973	$	—	$	18,624	$	—	$	18,624	$	—
Fixed income securities		1,833		—		1,833		—		1,853		—		1,853		—
Interest rate cap derivatives		13		—	$	13		—
Liabilities:
Interest rate swap derivatives	$	26,288	$	—	$	26,288	$	—	$	19,248	$	—	$	19,248	$	—

      Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2015
   Carrying
Value at
December 31,
2015    Quoted Prices in
Active Markets
(Level 1)    Significant Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)    Significant
Unobservable
Inputs (Level 3)
Assets:

Restricted investments:

Rabbi Trust
   $ 13,071       $ —         $ 13,071       $ —
Fixed income securities
   1,717       —         1,717       —
Interest rate cap derivatives
   93       —         93       —
Liabilities:

Interest rate swap derivatives
   $ 20,835       $ —         $ 20,835       $ —

The Company’s Level 2 financial instruments included in the tables above as of June 30, ~~2016~~2017 and December 31, ~~2015~~2016 consist of interest rate swap derivative liabilities and interest rate cap derivative assets held by the Company’s Australian subsidiary, the Company’s rabbi trust established for GEO employee and employer contributions to The GEO Group, Inc. Non-qualified Deferred Compensation Plan and an investment in Canadian dollar denominated fixed income securities. The balance of the interest rate cap derivative assets at June 30, 2017 was not significant.

The Australian subsidiary’s interest rate swap derivative liabilities and interest rate cap derivative assets are valued using a discounted cash flow model based on projected Australian borrowing rates. The Company’s restricted investment in the rabbi trust is invested in Company owned life insurance policies which are recorded at their cash surrender values. These investments are valued based on the underlying investments held in the policies’ separate account. The underlying assets are equity and fixed income pooled funds that are comprised of Level 1 and Level 2 securities. The Canadian dollar denominated securities, not actively traded, are valued using quoted rates for these and similar securities.

The Company’s consolidated balance sheets reflect certain financial assets and liabilities at carrying value. The carrying value of certain debt instruments, if applicable, is net of unamortized discount. The following tables present the carrying values of those financial instruments and the estimated corresponding fair values at June 30, ~~2016~~2017 and December 31, ~~2015~~2016 (in thousands):


			Estimated Fair Value Measurements at June 30, 2016										Estimated Fair Value Measurements at June 30, 2017
	Carrying Value as of June 30, 2016		Total Fair Value		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Carrying Value as of June 30, 2017		Total Fair Value		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
Assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	38,865	$	38,865	$	38,865	$	—	$	—	$	65,901	$	65,901	$	65,901	$	—	$	—
Restricted cash and investments		80,016		80,016		75,160		4,856		—		21,774		21,774		19,727		2,047		—
Liabilities:
Borrowings under senior credit facility	$	741,000	$	741,728	$	—	$	741,728	$	—	$	992,168	$	996,158	$	—	$	996,158	$	—
5.875% Senior Notes due 2024		250,000		253,438		—		253,438		—		250,000		259,930		—		259,930		—
5.125% Senior Notes		300,000		292,500		—		292,500		—		300,000		303,234		—		303,234		—
5.875% Senior Notes due 2022		250,000		253,438		—		253,438		—		250,000		260,793		—		260,793		—
6.00% Senior Notes		350,000		351,313		—		351,313		—		350,000		364,854		—		364,854		—
Non-recourse debt, Australian subsidiary		366,164		366,120		—		366,120		—		508,109		508,109		—		508,109		—
Other non-recourse debt, including current portion		42,668		45,047		—		45,047		—		36,680		37,555		—		37,555		—

			Estimated Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2015
	Carrying Value as of December 31, 2015		Total Fair Value		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
Assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	59,638	$	59,638	$	59,638	$	—	$	—
Restricted cash and investments		15,654		15,654		11,536		4,118		—
Liabilities:
Borrowings under senior credit facility	$	777,500	$	777,500	$	—	$	777,500	$	—
5.875% Senior Notes due 2024		250,000		245,783		—		245,783		—
5.125% Senior Notes		300,000		285,189		—		285,189		—
5.875% Senior Notes due 2022		250,000		248,125		—		248,125		—
6.625% Senior Notes		300,000		308,625		—		308,625		—
Non-recourse debt, Australian subsidiary		204,539		204,531		—		204,531		—
Other non-recourse debt, including current portion		42,592		43,353		—		43,353		—

The fair values of the Company’s cash and cash equivalents, and restricted cash approximates the carrying values of these assets at June 30, ~~2016~~2017 and December 31, ~~2015.~~2016. Restricted cash consists of money market funds, bank deposits, commercial paper and time deposits used for ~~payments on the Company’s non-recourse debt,~~ asset replacement funds contractually required to be maintained at the Company’s Australian subsidiary and contractual commitments related to the design and construction of a new facility in Ravenhall Australia. The fair value of the money market funds and bank deposits is based on quoted market prices (Level 1) and the fair value of commercial paper and time deposits is based on market prices for similar instruments (Level 2).

The fair values of the Company’s 5.875% senior unsecured notes due 2022 (“5.875% Senior Notes due 2022”), 5.875% senior unsecured notes due 2024 (“5.875% Senior Notes due 2024”), ~~6.625% senior unsecured notes due 2021 (“6.625 Senior Notes”),~~ 6.00% senior unsecured notes due 2026 (“6.00% Senior Notes”), and the 5.125% senior unsecured notes due 2023 (“5.125% Senior Notes”), although not actively traded, are based on published financial data for these instruments. On April 18, 2016, the Company completed an offering of $350 million aggregate principal amount of the 6.00% Senior Notes. The Company used part of the net proceeds to fund the tender offer or the repurchase, redemption or other discharge of any and all of its 6.625% Senior Notes. Refer to Note 9 - Debt. The fair values of the Company’s non-recourse debt related to the Washington Economic Development Finance Authority (“WEDFA”) is based on market prices for similar instruments. The fair value of the non-recourse debt related to the Company’s Australian subsidiary is estimated ~~using a discounted cash flow model~~ based on ~~current Australian borrowing rates for~~market prices of similar instruments. The fair value of borrowings under the senior credit facility is based on an estimate of trading value considering the Company’s borrowing rate, the undrawn spread and similar instruments.

The following table presents the changes in shareholders’ equity that are attributable to the Company’s shareholders and to noncontrolling interests (in thousands):


	Common shares					Additional Paid-In			Earnings in Excess of			Accumulated Other Comprehensive			Noncontrolling			Total Shareholders’			Common shares						Additional Paid-In Capital				Earnings in Excess of Distributions				Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss				Noncontrolling Interests				Total Shareholders’ Equity
	Shares			Amount		Capital			Distributions			Loss			Interests			Equity			Shares			Amount							Earnings in Excess of Distributions				Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss				Noncontrolling Interests				Total Shareholders’ Equity
*Balance, December 31, 2015*		74,643		$	747	$	879,599		$	158,796		$	(32,404	)	$	99		$	1,006,837
*Balance, December 31, 2016*																						112,548		$	1,125		Additional Paid-In Capital			$	891,993			$	112,763			$	(30,825	)		$	(99	)		$	974,957
Proceeds from exercise of stock options		93			—		2,057			—			—			—			2,057			307			3			6,147				—				—				—				6,150
Tax deficiency related to equity compensation		—			—		(791	)		—			—			—			(791	)
Stock-based compensation expense		—			—		6,489			—			—			—			6,489			—			—			9,993				—				—				—				9,993

Restricted stock granted		349			3		(3	)		—			—			—			—			924			9			(9	)			—				—				—				—

Restricted stock canceled		(48	)		—		—			—			—			—			—			(27	)		—			—				—				—				—				—

Dividends paid		—			—		—			(97,247	)		—			—			(97,247	)		—			—			—				(110,859	)			—				—				(110,859	)

Issuance of common stock – prospectus supplement																						10,350			104			275,763				—				—				—				275,867
Shares withheld for net settlements of share-based awards		(72	)		—		(2,257	)		—			—			—			(2,257	)		(134	)		(1	)		(4,091	)			—				—				—				(4,092	)
Other adjustments to additional paid-in-capital		—			—		179			—			—			—			179
Issuance of common stock - ESPP		7			—		224			—			—			—			224
Issuance of common stock – ESPP																						8			—			242				—				—				—				242
Net income (loss)		—			—		—			55,559			—			(77	)		55,482			—			—			—				71,395				—				(87	)			71,308
Other comprehensive (loss) income		—			—		—			—			(3,485	)		9			(3,476	)
Other comprehensive income																						—			—			—				—				3,131				2				3,133

*Balance, June 30, 2016*		74,972		$	750	$	885,497		$	117,108		$	(35,889	)	$	31		$	967,497
Balance, June 30, 2017																						123,976		$	1,240		$	1,180,038			$	73,299			$	(27,694	)		$	(184	)		$	1,226,699

During the six months ended June 30, ~~2016,~~2017, the Company withheld shares through net share settlements to satisfy ~~minimum~~ statutory tax withholding requirements upon vesting of shares of restricted stock held by employees.

Outstanding share and per-share amounts disclosed for all periods presented have been retroactively adjusted to reflect the effects of the stock split. Refer to Note 1 – Basis of Presentation.

As a REIT, GEO is required to distribute annually at least 90% of its REIT taxable income (determined without regard to the dividends paid deduction and by excluding net capital gain) and began paying regular quarterly REIT dividends in 2013. The amount, timing and frequency of future dividends, however, will be at the sole discretion of GEO’s Board of Directors (the “Board”) and will be declared based upon various factors, many of which are beyond GEO’s control, including, GEO’s financial condition and operating cash flows, the amount required to maintain REIT status, limitations on distributions in GEO’s existing and future debt instruments, limitations on GEO’s ability to fund distributions using cash generated through GEO’s taxable REIT subsidiaries (“TRSs”) and other factors that GEO’s Board may deem relevant.

During the six months ended June 30, ~~2016~~2017 and the year ended December 31, ~~2015,~~2016, respectively, GEO declared and paid the following regular cash distributions to its shareholders as follows:

Distributions per share above have been adjusted to reflect the effects of the stock split.

On ~~May~~March 7, 2017, the Company entered into an underwriting agreement related to the issuance and sale of 9,000,000 shares of common stock, par value $.01 per share, of the Company. The offering price to the public was $27.80 per share and the underwriters agreed to purchase the shares from the Company pursuant to the underwriting agreement at a price of $26.70 per share. In addition, under the terms of the underwriting agreement, the Company granted the underwriters an option, exercisable for 30 days, to purchase up to an additional 1,350,000 shares of common stock. On March 8, ~~2013,~~2017, the underwriters exercised in full their option to purchase the additional 1,350,000 shares of common stock. On March 13, 2017, the Company announced that it had completed the sale of 10,350,000 shares of common stock with its previously announced underwritten public offering. GEO received gross proceeds (before underwriting discounts and estimated offering expenses) of approximately $288.1 million from the offering, including approximately $37.6 million in connection with the sale of the additional shares. Fees paid in connection with the offering were not significant and have been netted against additional paid-in capital. The 10,350,000 shares of common stock were issued under GEO’s currently effective shelf registration filed with the Securities and Exchange ~~Commission a prospectus supplement related~~Commission. The net proceeds of this offering were used to repay amounts outstanding under the ~~offer and sale from time to time~~revolver portion of the Company’s ~~common stock at an aggregate offering price of up to $100.0 million through sales agents. Sales~~senior credit facility and for general corporate purposes. The number of shares and per-share amounts herein have been adjusted to reflect the effects of the ~~Company’s common~~ stock ~~under the prospectus supplement and equity distribution agreements entered into with the sales agents, if any, were~~split. Refer to ~~be made in negotiated transactions or transactions that were deemed to be “at the market” offerings as defined in Rule 415 under the Securities Act~~Note 1 – Basis of 1933. On July 18, 2014, the Company filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission a post-effective amendment to its shelf registration statement on Form S-3 (pursuant to which the prospectus supplement had been filed) as a result of the merger of the Company into GEO REIT effective June 27, 2014. There were no shares of the Company’s common stock sold under the prospectus supplement during the year ended December 31, 2015 nor the six months ended June 30, 2016.Presentation

In September 2014, the Company filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission ~~a new~~an automatic shelf registration statement on Form S-3. On November 10, 2014, in connection with the ~~new~~ shelf registration, the Company filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission a ~~new~~ prospectus supplement related to the offer and sale from time to time of the Company’s common stock at an aggregate offering price of up to $150.0 million through sales agents. Sales of shares of the Company’s common stock under the prospectus supplement and the equity distribution agreements entered into with the sales agents, if any, may be made in negotiated transactions or transactions that are deemed to be “at the market” offerings as defined in Rule 415 under the Securities Act of 1933. There were no shares of ~~the Company’s~~common stock ~~issued~~sold under this prospectus supplement during the ~~year ended December 31, 2015 nor the~~ six months ended June 30, 2017 or during the year ended December 31, 2016.

Comprehensive income (loss) represents the change in shareholders’ equity from transactions and other events and circumstances arising from non-shareholder sources. The Company’s total comprehensive income (loss) is comprised of net income attributable to GEO, net income attributable to noncontrolling interests, foreign currency translation adjustments that arise from consolidating foreign operations that do not impact cash flows, net unrealized gains and/or losses on derivative instruments, and pension liability adjustments within shareholders’ equity and comprehensive income (loss).

The components of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) attributable to GEO within shareholders’ equity are as follows:

   Six Months Ended June 30, 2016
   (In thousands)
   Foreign currency
translation adjustments,
net of tax attributable to
The GEO Group, Inc. (1) Unrealized (loss)/gain on
derivatives, net of tax Pension adjustments, net
of tax Total
Balance, December 31, 2015
   $ (11,747 ) $ (17,697 ) $ (2,960 ) $ (32,404 )
Current-period other comprehensive (loss) income
   1,092    (4,642 ) 65    (3,485 )


Balance, June 30, 2016
   $ (10,655 ) $ (22,339 ) $ (2,895 ) $ (35,889 )


	Six Months Ended June 30, 2017 (In thousands)
	Foreign currency translation adjustments, net of tax attributable to The GEO Group, Inc. (1)			Unrealized (loss)/gain on derivatives, net of tax			Pension adjustments, net of tax			Total
Balance, December 31, 2016	$	(11,284	)	$	(15,877	)	$	(3,664	)	$	(30,825	)
Current-period other comprehensive (loss) income		2,204			816			111			3,131

Balance, June 30, 2017	$	(9,080	)	$	(15,061	)	$	(3,553	)	$	(27,694	)

The Board has adopted The GEO Group, Inc. 2014 Stock Incentive Plan (the “2014 Plan”), which was approved by the Company’s shareholders on May 2, 2014. The 2014 Plan replaced the 2006 Stock Incentive Plan (the “2006 Plan”). As of the date the 2014 Plan was adopted, it provided for a reserve of ~~3,083,353~~4,625,030 shares, which consisted of ~~2,000,000~~3,000,000 new shares of common stock available for issuance and ~~1,083,353~~1,625,030 shares of common stock that were available for issuance under the 2006 Plan prior to the 2014 Plan replacing ~~it.~~it adjusted to reflect the effects of the stock split. The Company filed a Form S-8 registration statement related to the 2014 Plan on June 4, 2014, which was amended on July 18, 2014.

Outstanding share and per-share amounts disclosed for all periods presented have been retroactively adjusted to reflect the effects of the stock split. Refer to Note 1 – Basis of Presentation.

The Company uses a Black-Scholes option valuation model to estimate the fair value of each time based or performance based option awarded. For options granted during the six months ended June 30, ~~2016,~~2017, the fair value was estimated using the following assumptions: (i) volatility of ~~25%~~35.72%; (ii) expected term of 5.00 years; (iii) risk free interest rate of ~~1.45%~~1.53%; and (iv) expected dividend yield of ~~8.85%~~5.79%. A summary of the activity of stock option awards issued and outstanding under Company plans is as follows for the six months ended June 30, ~~2016:~~2017:

During the six months ended June 30, ~~2016,~~2017, the Company granted approximately ~~295,000~~461,000 options to certain employees which had a weighted-average grant-date fair value of ~~$2.08~~$5.91 per share. For the six months ended June 30, ~~2016~~2017 and June 30, ~~2015,~~2016, the amount of stock-based compensation expense related to stock options was ~~$0.3~~$0.9 million and ~~$0.5~~$0.3 million, respectively. As of June 30, ~~2016,~~2017, the Company had ~~$1.1~~$2.2 million of unrecognized compensation costs related to non-vested stock option awards that are expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of ~~3.0~~3.4 years.

Compensation expense for nonvested stock awards is recorded over the vesting period based on the fair value at the date of grant. Generally, the restricted stock awards vest in equal increments over either a three or four-year period. The fair value of restricted stock awards, which do not contain a market-based vesting condition, is determined using the closing price of the Company’s common stock on the date of grant. The Company has issued share-based awards with service-based, performance-based and market-based vesting criteria.

A summary of the activity of restricted stock outstanding is as follows for the six months ended June 30, ~~2016:~~2017:


	Shares			Wtd. Avg. Grant Date Fair Value		Shares			Wtd. Avg. Grant Date Fair Value
	(in thousands)					(in thousands)
Restricted stock outstanding at December 31, 2015		863		$	39.74
Restricted stock outstanding at December 31, 2016							1,346		$	24.37
Granted		349			30.21		924			35.40
Vested		(248	)		36.29		(435	)		23.16
Forfeited/canceled		(48	)		39.14		(27	)		24.42

Restricted stock outstanding at June 30, 2016		916		$	36.26
Restricted stock outstanding at June 30, 2017							1,808		$	30.44

During the six months ended June 30, ~~2016,~~2017, the Company granted approximately ~~349,000~~924,000 shares of restricted stock to certain employees and executive officers. Of these awards, ~~115,000~~295,000 are market and performance-based awards which will be forfeited if the Company does not achieve certain annual metrics during ~~2016,~~ 2017, 2018 and ~~2018.~~2019.

The vesting of these performance-based restricted stock grants are subject to the achievement by GEO of two annual performance metrics as follows: (i) up to 50% of the shares of restricted stock (“TSR Target Award”) can vest at the end of a three year performance period if GEO meets certain total shareholder return (“TSR”) performance targets, as compared to the total shareholder return of a peer group of companies, over a three year period from January 1, ~~2016~~2017 to December 31, ~~2018~~2019 and (ii) up to 50% of the shares of restricted stock (“ROCE Target Award”) can vest at the end of a three year period if GEO meets certain return on capital employed (“ROCE”) performance targets over a three year period from January 1, ~~2016~~2017 to December 31, ~~2018.~~2019. These market and performance awards can vest at between 0% and 200% of the target awards for both metrics. The number of shares shown for the performance-based awards is based on the target awards for both metrics.

The metric related to ROCE is considered to be a performance condition. For share-based awards that contain a performance condition, the achievement of the targets must be probable before any share-based compensation expense is recorded. The Company reviews the likelihood of which the target in the range will be achieved and if deemed probable, compensation expense is recorded at that time. If subsequent to initial measurement there is a change in the estimate of the probability of meeting the performance condition, the effect of the change in the estimated quantity of awards expected to vest is recognized by cumulatively adjusting compensation expense. If ultimately the performance targets are not met, for any awards where vesting was previously deemed probable, previously recognized compensation expense will be reversed in the period in which vesting is no longer deemed probable. The fair value of these awards was determined based on the closing price of the Company’s common stock on the date of grant.

The metric related to TSR is considered to be a market condition. For share-based awards that contain a market condition, the probability of satisfying the market condition must be considered in the estimate of grant-date fair value and previously recorded compensation expense is not reversed if the market condition is never met. The fair value of these awards was determined based on a Monte Carlo simulation, which calculates a range of possible outcomes and the probabilities that they will occur, using the following average key assumptions: (i) volatility of ~~23.5%~~42.2%; (ii) beta of ~~1.04;~~1.11; and (iii) risk free rates of ~~1.08%~~1.46%.

For the six months ended June 30, ~~2016~~2017 and June 30, ~~2015,~~2016, the Company recognized ~~$6.1~~$9.1 million and ~~$5.0~~$6.1 million, respectively, of compensation expense related to its restricted stock awards. As of June 30, ~~2016,~~2017, the Company had ~~$26.0~~$41.6 million of unrecognized compensation costs related to non-vested restricted stock awards, including non-vested restricted stock awards with performance-based and market-based vesting, that are expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of ~~2.6~~2.9 years.

The Company previously adopted The GEO Group Inc. 2011 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the “Plan”) which was approved by the Company’s shareholders. The purpose of the Plan, which is qualified under Section 423 of the Internal Revenue Service Code of 1986, as amended, is to encourage stock ownership through payroll deductions by the employees of GEO and designated subsidiaries of GEO in order to increase their identification with the Company’s goals and secure a proprietary interest in the Company’s success. These deductions are used to purchase shares of the Company’s common stock at a 5% discount from the then current market price. The Company has made available up to ~~500,000~~750,000, as split adjusted, shares of its common stock, which were registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 4, 2012, as amended on July 18, 2014, for sale to eligible employees under the Plan.

The Plan is considered to be non-compensatory. As such, there is no compensation expense required to be recognized. Share purchases under the Plan are made on the last day of each month. During the six months ended June 30, ~~2016, 7,362~~2017, 4,060 shares of the Company’s common stock were issued in connection with the Plan.

Basic earnings per common share is computed by dividing the net income from continuing operations attributable to The GEO Group, Inc. by the weighted average number of outstanding shares of common stock. The calculation of diluted earnings per share is similar to that of basic earnings per share except that the denominator includes dilutive common stock equivalents such as stock options and shares of restricted stock. Basic and diluted earnings per share were calculated for the three and six months ended June 30, ~~2016~~2017 and ~~June 30, 2015~~2016 as follows (in thousands, except per share data):


	Three Months Ended				Six Months Ended				Three Months Ended				Six Months Ended
	June 30, 2016		June 30, 2015		June 30, 2016		June 30, 2015		June 30, 2017		June 30, 2016		June 30, 2017		June 30, 2016
Net income	$	23,156	$	28,253	$	55,482	$	57,010	$	30,942	$	23,156	$	71,308	$	55,482
Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interests		53		38		77		58		50		53		87		77
Net income attributable to The GEO Group, Inc.		23,209		28,291		55,559		57,068		30,992		23,209		71,395		55,559
Basic earnings per share attributable to The GEO Group, Inc.:
Weighted average shares outstanding		74,044		73,665		73,960		73,607		122,125		111,066		117,885		110,940

Per share amount	$	0.31	$	0.38	$	0.75	$	0.78	$	0.25	$	0.21	$	0.61	$	0.50

Diluted earnings per share attributable to The GEO Group, Inc.:
Weighted average shares outstanding		74,044		73,665		73,960		73,607		122,125		111,066		117,885		110,940
Dilutive effect of equity incentive plans		275		238		294		287		770		413		817		441
Weighted average shares assuming dilution		74,319		73,903		74,254		73,894		122,895		111,479		118,702		111,381

Per share amount	$	0.31	$	0.38	$	0.75	$	0.77	$	0.25	$	0.21	$	0.60	$	0.50

Outstanding share and per-share amounts disclosed for all periods presented have been retroactively adjusted to reflect the effects of the stock split.

For the three months ended June 30, ~~2016, 255,463~~2017, 486,018 weighted average shares of common stock underlying options were excluded from the computation of diluted earnings per share (“EPS”) because the effect would be anti-dilutive. There were ~~178,574~~175,385 common stock equivalents from restricted shares that were anti-dilutive.

For the three months ended June 30, ~~2015, 249,506~~2016, 383,195 weighted average shares of common stock underlying options were excluded from the computation of diluted EPS because the effect would be anti-dilutive. There were ~~264,500~~267,861 common stock equivalents from restricted shares that were anti-dilutive.

For the six months ended June 30, 2016, 543,098 weighted average shares of common stock underlying options were excluded from the computation of diluted earnings per share because the effect would be anti-dilutive. There were 265,089 common stock equivalents from restricted shares that were anti-dilutive.

~~For the six months ended June 30, 2015, 166,860~~2017, 561,129 weighted average shares of common stock underlying options were excluded from the computation of diluted EPS because the effect would be anti-dilutive. There were ~~176,319~~554,201 common stock equivalents from restricted shares that were anti-dilutive.

8.For the six months ended June 30, 2016, 814,647 weighted average shares of common stock underlying options were excluded from the computation of diluted EPS because the effect would be anti-dilutive. There were 397,634 common stock equivalents from restricted shares that were anti-dilutive.

The Company’s primary objective in holding derivatives is to reduce the volatility of earnings and cash flows associated with changes in interest rates. The Company measures its derivative financial instruments at fair value.

The Company’s Australian subsidiary is a party to an interest rate swap agreement to fix the interest rate on its variable rate non-recourse debt (related to its Fulham facility) to 9.7%. The Company ~~has~~had determined the ~~swap, which has a notional amount of AUD 50.9 million, or $37.9 million, based on exchange rates in effect as of June 30, 2016,~~swap’s payment and expiration dates, and call provisions that ~~coincide~~coincided with the terms of the non-recourse debt, to be an effective cash flow hedge. Accordingly, the Company ~~records~~recorded the change in the fair value of the interest rate swap in accumulated other comprehensive income, net of applicable income taxes. Total unrealized gains recorded in other comprehensive income, net of tax, related to this cash flow hedge were not significant for the six months ended June 30, ~~2016~~2017 and ~~2015.~~2016. The ~~total fair value of~~associated non-recourse debt was paid off during the six months ended June 30, 2017 and the interest rate swap ~~liability was not significant~~is no longer in existence as of June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively, and is recorded as a component of other non-current liabilities within the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. There was no material ineffectiveness of this interest rate swap for the periods presented. The Company does not expect to enter into any transactions during the next twelve months which would result in the reclassification into earnings or losses associated with this swap currently reported in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss).2017.

The Company’s Australian subsidiary has entered into interest rate swap agreements to fix the interest rate on its variable rate non-recourse debt related to a prison project in Ravenhall, a locality near Melbourne, Australia to 3.3% during the design and construction phase and 4.2% during the project’s operating phase. The swaps’ notional amounts coincide with construction draw fixed commitments throughout the project. At June 30, ~~2016,~~2017, the swaps had a notional amount of approximately AUD ~~483~~671 million, or ~~$359~~$516 million, based on exchange rates at June 30, ~~2016,~~2017, related to the outstanding draws for the design and construction phase and approximately AUD 466 million, or ~~$347~~$358 million, based on exchange rates at June 30, ~~2016~~2017 related to future construction draws. ~~The~~At the onset, the Company ~~has~~had determined that the swaps have payment, expiration dates, and provisions that coincide with the terms of the non-recourse debt scheduled construction draw commitments and ~~are~~were therefore considered to be effective cash flow hedges. During 2017, certain of the critical terms of the swap agreements no longer coincided with the scheduled construction draw commitments. However, the swaps are still considered to be highly effective and the measurement of any ineffectiveness was not significant during the six months ended June 30, 2017. Accordingly, the Company records the change in the fair value of the interest rate swaps in accumulated other comprehensive income, net of applicable income taxes. Total unrealized ~~loss~~gain recorded in other comprehensive income, net of tax, related to this cash flow hedge was ~~approximately $4.6~~$0.8 million during the six months ended June 30, ~~2016.~~2017. The total fair value of the swap liability as of June 30, ~~2016~~2017 was ~~$26.2~~$17.7 million and is recorded as a component of Other Non-Current liabilities within the accompanying consolidated balance sheet. There was no material ineffectiveness for the periods presented. The Company does not expect to enter into any transactions during the next twelve months which would result in the reclassification into earnings or losses associated with these swaps currently reported in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss).

Additionally, upon completion and commercial acceptance of the prison project, the Department of Justice in the State of Victoria (the “State”) in accordance with the prison contract, will make a lump sum payment of AUD 310 million, or approximately ~~$231~~$238 million, based on exchange rates at June 30, ~~2016,~~2017, towards a portion of the outstanding principal of the non-recourse debt. The Company’s Australian subsidiary also entered into interest rate cap agreements ~~in September 2014~~ giving the Company the option to cap the interest rate on its variable non-recourse debt related to the project in the event that the completion of the prison project is delayed which could delay the State’s payment. ~~The Company paid $1.7 million for the interest rate cap agreements.~~ These instruments do not meet the requirements for hedge accounting, and therefore, changes in fair value of the interest rate caps are recorded in earnings. Total losses related to a decrease in the fair value of the interest rate cap assets were not significant during the six months ended June 30, 2017 or 2016. The total fair value of the interest rate cap assets was not significant as of June 30, ~~2016~~2017 and December 31, ~~2015,~~2016, respectively, and is recorded as a component of other non-current assets within the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.

Debt outstanding as of June 30, ~~2016~~2017 and December 31, ~~2015~~2016 consisted of the following (in thousands):

~~In April 2015, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued ASU No. 2015-03,~~~~“Interest-Imputation of Interest,”~~ which is intended to simplify the presentation of debt issuance costs. The amendments require that debt issuance costs related to a recognized debt liability be presented as a direct reduction from the carrying amount of that debt liability, consistent with debt discounts. In accordance with ASU No. 2015-03, the Company adopted the new standard during the six months ended June 30, 2016 and has applied the new guidance on a retrospective basis. Refer to Note 13 - Recent Accounting Pronouncements.


	June 30, 2017			December 31, 2016
Senior Credit Facility:
Term loan	$	798,000		$	289,500
Unamortized discount on term loan		(3,822	)		(375	)
Unamortized debt issuance costs on term loan		(8,313	)		—
Revolver		194,168			515,000

Total Senior Credit Facility	$	980,033		$	804,125
6.00% Senior Notes:
Notes Due in 2026		350,000			350,000
Unamortized debt issuance costs		(5,567	)		(5,770	)

Total 6.00% Senior Notes Due in 2026		344,433			344,230
5.875% Senior Notes:
Notes Due in 2024		250,000			250,000
Unamortized debt issuance costs		(3,584	)		(3,773	)

Total 5.875% Senior Notes Due in 2024		246,416			246,227
5.125% Senior Notes:
Notes Due in 2023		300,000			300,000
Unamortized debt issuance costs		(4,492	)		(4,786	)

Total 5.125% Senior Notes Due in 2023		295,508			295,214
5.875% Senior Notes
Notes Due in 2022		250,000			250,000
Unamortized debt issuance costs		(3,590	)		(3,923	)

Total 5.875% Senior Notes Due in 2022		246,410			246,077

Non-Recourse Debt		544,789			490,902
Unamortized debt issuance costs on non-recourse debt		(15,018	)		(18,295	)
Unamortized discount on non-recourse debt		(334	)		(400	)

Total Non-Recourse Debt		529,437			472,207
Capital Lease Obligations		8,076			8,693
Other debt		2,866			3,030

Total debt		2,653,179			2,419,803
Current portion of capital lease obligations, long-term debt and non-recourse debt		(255,404	)		(238,065	)
Capital Lease Obligations, long-term portion		(6,787	)		(7,431	)
Non-Recourse Debt, long-term portion		(283,780	)		(238,842	)

Long-Term Debt	$	2,107,208		$	1,935,465

On ~~May 19, 2016 (the “Amendment Effective Date”),~~March 23, 2017, the Company executed a third amended and restated credit agreement by and among The GEO ~~executed Amendment No. 1, among GEO~~Group, Inc. and GEO Corrections Holdings, Inc. ~~(together~~, (“Corrections” and, together with The GEO Group, Inc., the “Borrowers”), ~~GEO Australasia Holdings Pty Ltd (“GEO Australasia Holdings”), GEO Australasia Finance Holdings Pty Ltd as trustee for~~ the GEO Australasia Finance Holding Trust (the “Australian Trust”) (the “Australian Trustee”, and together with GEO Australasia Holdings, collectively, the “Australian Borrowers”), the guarantors party thereto, the issuing lenders party thereto, the lenders party thereto andAustralian Borrowers named therein, BNP Paribas, as ~~administrative agent (the “Amendment”), to the Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of August 27, 2014, by and among the Borrowers, BNP Paribas, as administrative agent,~~Administrative Agent, and the lenders who are, or may from time to time become, a party thereto (the ~~“Existing Credit~~“Credit Agreement”).

The ~~Amendment amends certain terms of the Existing~~ Credit Agreement refinances GEO’s prior $291.0 million term loan, reestablishes GEO’s ability to ~~effect~~implement at a ~~revolving~~later date an Australian Dollar Letter of Credit Facility (the “Australian LC Facility”) providing for the issuance of financial letters of credit and performance letters of credit, in each case denominated in Australian Dollars up to AUD275 million, an increase infrom the ~~amount of $200.0~~prior AUD225 million ~~increases to the total leverage thresholds used in the determination of the applicable interest rates,~~Australian LC Facility, and certain other modifications ~~(the Existing~~to the prior credit agreement. Loan costs of approximately $7.0 million were incurred and capitalized in connection with the transaction.

The Amendment further provides that each Revolving Credit Lender (including each applicable Increasing Lender and each Assuming Lender) that executed a lender addendum as a multicurrency subfacility lender agrees to provide a multicurrency subfacility commitment to the Borrowers and the Australian Borrowers at the Amendment Effective Time in an aggregate principal amount equal to $100.0 million (the “Multicurrency Subfacility Commitment”) on the terms set forth in the Amended Credit Agreement. The aggregate amount of loans and letters of credit that may be issued under the Revolving Credit Commitment and the Multicurrency Subfacility Commitment may not exceed $900.0 million.

~~Giving effect to the Amendment, the Amended Credit Agreement currently~~ evidences a ~~Credit Facility~~credit facility (the “Credit Facility”) consisting of ~~a $291.0~~an $800 million ~~Term Loan~~term loan (the “Term Loan”) bearing interest at LIBOR plus ~~2.50%~~2.25% (with a LIBOR floor of ~~.75%~~0.75%), and a ~~$900.0~~$900 million revolving credit facility (the “Revolver”) initially bearing interest at LIBOR plus 2.25% (with ano LIBOR ~~floor of 0.00%)~~floor) together with ~~AUD225.0~~AUD275 million available solely for the issuance of financial letters of credit and performance letters of credit, in each case denominated in Australian Dollars ~~(the “Australian~~under the Australian LC ~~Facility”). The Amended~~Facility. As of June 30, 2017, there were no letters of credit issued under the Australian LC Facility. Amounts to be borrowed by GEO under the Credit Agreement ~~also includes~~are subject to the satisfaction of customary conditions to borrowing. The Term Loan component is scheduled to mature on March 23, 2024. The revolving credit commitment component is scheduled to mature on May 19, 2021; provided, that if on October 3, 2019 both the maturity dates of all term loans and incremental term loans have not been extended to a ~~$100.0 million Multicurrency Subfacility Commitment~~date that is ~~part of~~5¹⁄₂ years after March 23, 2017 or a later date, and the ~~Revolver and a $300.0 million letter of credit subfacility that is part of~~senior secured leverage ratio exceeds 2.50 to 1.00, then the ~~Revolver.~~termination date will be October 3, 2019. The ~~Amended~~ Credit Agreement also has an accordion feature of $450.0 million, subject to lender demand and prevailing market conditions and satisfying the relevant borrowing conditions. The Term Loan Maturity Date under the Amended Credit Agreement did not change from the Existing Credit Agreement and is April 3, 2020. The Amendment amended the termination date for the Revolving Credit Commitment component to May 19, 2021; provided, that if on October 3, 2019 both the maturity dates of all Term Loans and Incremental Term Loans have not been extended to November 19, 2021 or a later date, and the senior secured leverage ratio exceeds 2.50 to 1.00, then the termination date of the Revolving Credit Commitments will be October 3, 2019. The Amendment amended the maturity date for the performance letter of credit component of the Australian LC Facility to October 1, 2016, and the maturity date for the financial letter of credit component of the Australian LC Facility to February 15, 2017.

The ~~Amended~~ Credit Agreement contains certain customary representations and warranties, and certain customary covenants that restrict GEO’s ability to, among other things (i) create, incur or assume any indebtedness, (ii) create, incur, assume or permit liens, (iii) make loans and investments, (iv) engage in mergers, acquisitions and asset sales, (v) make certain restricted payments, (vi) issue, sell or otherwise dispose of capital stock, (vii) engage in transactions with affiliates, (viii) allow the total leverage ratio

to exceed 6.25 to 1.00, allow the senior secured leverage ratio to exceed 3.50 to 1.00, or allow the interest coverage ratio to be less than 3.00 to 1.00, (ix) cancel, forgive, make any voluntary or optional payment or prepayment on, or redeem or acquire for value any senior notes, except as permitted, (x) allow the Australian Trustee to resign or retire as trustee of the Australian Trust or cause or permit any other person to become an additional trustee of the Australian Trust or take, or omit to take any action, which might or would result in the retirement, removal or replacement of the Australian Trustee as trustee of the Australian Trust, except as permitted, (xi) alter the business GEO conducts, and ~~(xii)~~(xi) materially impair GEO’s lenders’ security interests in the collateral for its loans.

Events of default under the ~~Amended~~ Credit Agreement include, but are not limited to, (i) GEO’s ~~or any Australian Borrower’s~~ failure to pay principal or interest when due, (ii) GEO’s material breach of any representation or warranty, (iii) covenant defaults, (iv) liquidation, reorganization or other relief relating to bankruptcy or insolvency, (v) cross default under certain other material indebtedness, (vi) unsatisfied final judgments over a specified threshold, (vii) certain material environmental liability claims ~~which have been~~ asserted against GEO, (viii) unless the Australian Borrower Resignation Date (as defined in the Amended Credit Agreement) has occurred, certain events involving the Australian Trustee or the Australian Trust occur including the Australian Trustee ceases to be the trustee of the Australian Trust or the Australian Trust is terminated, and ~~(ix)~~(viii) a change in control.

All of the obligations under the ~~Amended~~ Credit Agreement are unconditionally guaranteed by certain domestic subsidiaries of GEO and the ~~Amended~~ Credit Agreement and the related guarantees are secured by a perfected first-priority pledge of substantially all of GEO’s present and future tangible and intangible domestic assets and all present and future tangible and intangible domestic assets of each guarantor, including but not limited to a first-priority pledge of all of the outstanding capital stock owned by GEO and each guarantor in their domestic subsidiaries.

The Australian Borrowers are wholly owned foreign subsidiaries of GEO. GEO ~~and became party to the Amended Credit Agreement by executing the Amendment. Pursuant to the Amendment, GEO~~has designated each of the Australian Borrowers as restricted subsidiaries under the ~~Amended~~ Credit Agreement. However, the Australian Borrowers are not obligated to pay or perform any obligations under the ~~Amended~~ Credit Agreement other than their own obligations as Australian Borrowers under the ~~Amended~~ Credit Agreement. The Australian Borrowers do not pledge any of their assets to secure any obligations under the ~~Amended~~ Credit Agreement.

On August 18, 2016, the Company executed a Letter of Offer by and among GEO and HSBC Bank Australia Limited (the “Letter of Offer”) providing for a bank guarantee line and bank guarantee/standby sub-facility in an aggregate amount of AUD100 million, or $76.9 million, based on exchange rates in effect as of June 30, 2017 (collectively, the “Bank Guarantee Facility”). The Bank Guarantee Facility allows GEO to provide letters of credit to assure performance of certain obligations of its wholly owned subsidiary relating to its prison project in Ravenhall, located near Melbourne, Australia. The Bank Guarantee Facility is unsecured. The issuance of letters of credit under the Bank Guarantee Facility is subject to the satisfaction of the conditions precedent specified in the Letter of Offer. Letters of credit issued under the bank guarantee lines are due on demand and letters of credit issued under the bank guarantee/standby sub-facility cannot have a duration exceeding twelve months. The Bank Guarantee Facility may be terminated by HSBC on 90 days written notice. As of June 30, 2017, there was AUD100 million in letters of credit issued under the Bank Guarantee Facility.

As of June 30, ~~2016,~~2017, the Company had ~~$291.0~~$798 million in aggregate borrowings outstanding under the Term Loan, ~~$450.0~~$194 million in borrowings under the Revolver, and approximately ~~$54.2~~$64 million in letters of credit which left ~~$395.8~~$642 million in additional borrowing capacity under the Revolver. The weighted average interest rate on outstanding borrowings under the ~~Amended~~ Credit Agreement as of June 30, ~~2016~~2017 was ~~2.9%~~3.4%.

On April 18, 2016, the Company completed an offering of $350 million aggregate principal amount of 6.00% senior notes due 2026. The 6.00% Senior Notes were offered and sold in a registered offering pursuant to an underwriting agreement, dated as of April 11, 2016 (the “Underwriting Agreement”) among the Company, certain of the Company’s domestic subsidiaries, as guarantors and Wells Fargo Securities, LLC, as representative for the underwriters named therein. The 6.00% Senior Notes were issued by the Company pursuant to the Indenture, dated as of September 25, 2014 (the “Base Indenture”), by and between the Company and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as trustee, as supplemented by a Second Supplemental Indenture, dated as of April 18, 2016 (the “Second Supplemental Indenture” and together with the Base Indenture, the “Indenture”), by and among the Company, the guarantors and the trustee which governs the terms of the 6.00% Senior Notes. The sale of the 6.00% Senior Notes was registered under GEO’s existing shelf registration statement on Form S-3 filed on September 12, 2014, as amended (File No. 333-198729). The 6.00% Senior Notes were issued at a coupon rate and yield to maturity of 6.00%. Interest on the 6.00% Senior Notes ~~is payable~~due 2026 accrues at the stated rate. The Company pays interest semi-annually in arrears on April 15 and October 15 of each ~~year, commencing on October~~year. On or after April 15, ~~2016. The~~2019, the Company may, at its option, redeem all or part of the 6.00% Senior Notes mature on April 15, 2026. The Company used part of the net proceeds to fund the tender offer or the repurchase, redemption or other discharge of any and all of its 6.625% Senior Notes (see discussion below), to pay all related fees, costs and expenses and for general corporate purposes including repaying borrowings under the Company’s Revolver. Loan costs of approximately $6 million were incurred and capitalized in connection with the offering.

~~On February 10, 2011, the Company completed a private offering of $300.0 million in aggregate principal amount of its 6.625% Senior Notes. Interest on the 6.625% Senior Notes accrued~~2026 at the ~~stated rate. The Company paid interest semi-annually~~redemption prices set forth in ~~arrears on February 15 and August 15 of each year.~~

On April 11, 2016, the Company announced that it had commenced a cash tender offer for any and all of its $300.0 million aggregate principal amount of its 6.625% Senior Notes due 2021. On April 18, 2016, the Company completed the purchase of $231.0 million in aggregate principal amount of its 6.625% Senior Notes validly tendered in connection with the Company’s tender offer on or prior to the expiration time. On May 20, 2016, the Company completed the redemption of the remaining 6.625% Senior Notes in connection with the terms of the notice of redemption delivered to the note holders on April 20, 2016 pursuant to the terms of the indenture governing the ~~6.625% Senior Notes. The Company financed the purchase of the 6.625% Senior Notes under the tender offer with part of the net cash proceeds from the~~ 6.00% Senior Notes ~~(see discussion above). As a result of the tender offer~~due 2026. The indenture contains certain covenants, including limitations and ~~redemption,~~restrictions on the Company ~~incurred a $15.9 million loss on extinguishment of debt related~~and its subsidiary guarantors. Refer to ~~the tender premium and deferred costs associated with the 6.625% Senior Notes.~~Note 15-Condensed Consolidating Financial Information.

Interest on the 5.875% Senior Notes due 2024 accrues at the stated rate. The Company pays interest semi-annually in arrears on April 15 and October 15 of each year. On or after October 15, 2019, the Company may, at its option, redeem all or part of the 5.875% Senior Notes due 2024 at the redemption prices set forth in the indenture governing the 5.875% Senior Notes due 2024. The indenture contains certain covenants, including limitations and restrictions on the Company and its subsidiary guarantors. Refer to Note ~~14-Condensed~~15-Condensed Consolidating Financial Information.

Interest on the 5.125% Senior Notes accrues at the stated rate. The Company pays interest semi-annually in arrears on April 1 and October 1 of each year. On or after April 1, 2018, the Company may, at its option, redeem all or part of the 5.125% Senior Notes at the redemption prices set forth in the indenture governing the 5.125% Senior Notes. The indenture contains certain covenants, including limitations and restrictions on the Company and its subsidiary guarantors. Refer to Note ~~14-Condensed~~15-Condensed Consolidating Financial Information.

Interest on the 5.875% Senior Notes due 2022 accrues at the stated rate. The Company pays interest semi-annually in arrears on January 15 and July 15 of each year. On or after January 15, 2017, the Company may, at its option, redeem all or part of the 5.875% Senior Notes due 2022 at the redemption prices set forth in the indenture governing the 5.875% Senior Notes due 2022. The indenture contains certain covenants, including limitations and restrictions on the Company and its subsidiary guarantors. Refer to Note ~~14-Condensed~~15-Condensed Consolidating Financial Information.

The remaining balance of the original debt service requirement under the $54.4 million note payable (“2011 Revenue Bonds”) to WEDFA will mature in October 2021 with fixed coupon rates of 5.25%, is ~~$43.1~~$36.7 million, of which ~~$6.5~~$6.7 million is classified as current in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet as of June 30, ~~2016.~~2017. The payment of principal and interest on the 2011 Revenue Bonds issued by WEDFA is non-recourse to GEO.

As of June 30, ~~2016,~~2017, included in current restricted cash and investments ~~and non-current restricted cash and investments~~ is ~~$8.4~~$8.0 million of funds held in trust for debt service and other reserves with respect to the above mentioned note payable to WEDFA.

~~The~~At December 31, 2016, the non-recourse obligation of the Company totaled ~~$6.2~~$2.8 million (AUD ~~8.3 million) and $9.0 million (AUD 12.4~~3.6 million), based on the exchange rates in effect at ~~June 30, 2016 and~~ December 31, ~~2015, respectively.~~2016. The term of the non-recourse debt iswas through 2017 and it ~~bears~~bore interest at a variable rate quoted by certain Australian banks plus 140 basis points. Any obligations or liabilities of the subsidiary ~~are~~were matched by a similar or corresponding commitment from the government of the State of Victoria. ~~As a condition of~~During the ~~loan, the Company is required to maintain a restricted cash balance of AUD 5.0 million, which, based on exchange rates as of~~six months ended June 30, ~~2016,~~2017, the remaining balance was ~~$3.7 million. This amount is included~~paid in ~~non-current restricted cash and investments and the annual maturities of the future debt obligation are included in Non-Recourse Debt in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.~~full.

In connection with a new design and build prison project agreement with the State, the Company entered into a syndicated facility agreement (the “Construction Facility”) with National Australia Bank Limited to provide debt financing for construction of the project. The Construction Facility provides for non-recourse funding up to AUD 791.0 million, or approximately ~~$589.0~~$608.0 million, based on exchange rates as of June 30, ~~2016.~~2017. Construction draws ~~will be~~are funded throughout the project according to a fixed utilization schedule as defined in the syndicated facility agreement. The term of the Construction Facility is through October 2019 and bears interest at a variable rate quoted by certain Australian banks plus 200 basis points. ~~Upon completion~~The project is being developed under a public-private partnership financing structure with a capital contribution from the Company, which was made in January 2017, of ~~the prison,~~approximately AUD115 million, or $88.4 million, based on exchange rates as of June 30, 2017. After October 2019, the Construction Facility will be converted to a term loan with payments due quarterly beginning in ~~2018~~2019 through 2041. In accordance with the terms of the Construction Facility, upon completion and commercial acceptance of the prison, in accordance with the prison contract, the State will make a lump sum payment of ~~AUD 310~~AUD310 million, or approximately ~~$231~~$238 million, based on exchange rates as of June 30, ~~2016,~~2017, towards a portion of the outstanding principal. The remaining outstanding principal balance will be repaid over the term of the operating agreement. As of June 30, ~~2016,~~2017, approximately ~~$359~~$508 million was outstanding under the Construction Facility. The Company also entered into interest rate swap and interest rate cap agreements related to its non-recourse debt in connection with the project. Refer to Note ~~8 -~~9 – Derivative Financial Instruments.

The Company has entered into certain guarantees in connection with the financing and construction performance of a facility in Australia. The obligations amounted to approximately AUD ~~215.0~~100.0 million, or ~~$160.1~~$76.9 million, based on exchange rates as of June 30, ~~2016.~~2017. These guarantees are secured by outstanding letters of credit under the Company’s Revolver as of June 30, ~~2016.~~2017.

At June 30, ~~2016,~~2017, the Company also had ~~thirteen~~ten other letters of credit outstanding under separate international facilities relating to performance guarantees of its Australian subsidiary totaling ~~$19.6~~$15.6 million.

In connection with the creation of South African Custodial Services Pty. Limited (“SACS”), the Company entered into certain guarantees related to the financing, construction and operation of the prison. As of June 30, ~~2016,~~2017, the Company guaranteed obligations amounting to ~~15.0~~7.4 million South African Rand, or ~~$1.0~~$0.6 million based on exchange rates as of June 30, ~~2016.~~2017. In the event SACS is unable to maintain the required funding in a rectification account maintained for the payment of certain costs in the event of contract termination, a previously existing guarantee by the Company for the shortfall will need to be re-instated. The remaining guarantee of ~~15.0~~7.4 million South African Rand is secured by outstanding letters of credit under the Company’s Revolver as of June 30, ~~2016.~~2017.

In addition to the above, the Company has also agreed to provide a loan, if required, of up to 20 million South African Rand, or ~~$1.4~~$1.5 million based on exchange rates as of June 30, ~~2016,~~2017, referred to as the Shareholder’s Loan, to SACS for the purpose of financing SACS’ obligations under its contract with the South African government. No amounts have been funded under the standby facility, and the Company does not currently anticipate that such funding will be required by SACS in the future. The Company’s obligations under the Shareholder’s Loan expire upon the earlier of full funding or SACS’s release from its obligations under its debt agreements. SACS’ ability to draw on the Shareholder’s Loan is limited to certain circumstances, including termination of the contract.

The Company has also guaranteed certain obligations of SACS to the security trustee for SACS’ lenders. The Company secured its guarantee to the security trustee by ceding its rights to claims against SACS in respect of any loans or other finance agreements, and by pledging the Company’s shares in SACS. The Company’s liability under the guarantee is limited to the cession and pledge of shares. The guarantee expires upon expiration of the cession and pledge agreements.

In connection with a design, build, finance and maintenance contract for a facility in Canada, the Company guaranteed certain potential tax obligations of a trust. The potential estimated exposure of these obligations is Canadian Dollar ~~1.5~~1.4 million, or ~~$1.2~~$1.1 million, based on exchange rates as of June 30, ~~2016,~~2017, commencing in 2017. The liability related to this exposure is included in Other Non-Current Liabilities as of June 30, ~~2016~~2017 and December 31, ~~2015,~~2016, respectively. To secure this guarantee, the Company purchased Canadian Dollar denominated securities with maturities matched to the estimated tax obligations in 2017 to 2021. The Company has recorded an asset equal to the current fair value of those securities included in Other Non-Current Assets as of June 30, ~~2016~~2017 and December 31, ~~2015~~2016 on its consolidated balance sheets. The Company maintains the facility but does not currently operate or manage ~~this facility.~~it.

In connection with the creation of GEOAmey, the Company and its joint venture partner guarantee the availability of working capital in equal proportion to ensure that GEOAmey can comply with current and future contractual commitments related to the performance of its operations. The Company and the 50% joint venture partner have each extended a £12 million line of credit, or ~~$16.1~~$15.6 million, based on exchange rates as of June 30, ~~2016,~~2017, of which ~~£6.0~~£2.5 million, or ~~$8.0~~$3.3 million, based on exchange rates as of June 30, ~~2016,~~2017, was outstanding as of June 30, ~~2016. On June 29, 2016, GEOAmey made a principal payment in the amount of £2.5 million.~~2017 to each joint venture partner. The Company’s maximum exposure relative to the joint venture is its note receivable of approximately $8$3.3 million, which is included in Other Non-Current Assets in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets, and future financial support necessary to guarantee performance under the contract.

Except as discussed above, the Company does not have any off balance sheet arrangements.

On August 25, 2016, a purported shareholder class action lawsuit was filed against the Company, its Chief Executive Officer, George C. Zoley (“Mr. Zoley”), and its Chief Financial Officer, Brian R. Evans (“Mr. Evans”), in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida. The complaint alleged that the Company and Messrs. Zoley and Evans made false and misleading statements regarding the Company’s business, operational and compliance policies. The lawsuit alleged that it was brought by John J. Mulvaney individually and on behalf of a class consisting of all persons other than the defendants who purchased or otherwise acquired the Company’s securities during the alleged class period between March 1, 2012 through and including August 17, 2016. The complaint alleged that the Company and Messrs. Zoley and Evans violated Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder, and alleged that Messrs. Zoley and Evans violated Section 20(a) of the Exchange Act. On December 21, 2016, the appointed lead plaintiffs filed an Amended Class Action Complaint, which reasserted the claims against the Company and Messrs. Zoley and Evans, and asserted new claims for alleged false and misleading statements in violation of Section 20(a) of the Exchange Act against the Company’s former Senior Vice President, GEO Detention & Corrections Services, John Hurley (“Mr. Hurley”) and the Company’s Senior Vice President and President, GEO Corrections & Detention, David Donahue (“Mr. Donahue”). The amended complaint sought damages, interest, attorneys’ fees, expert fees, other costs, and such other relief as the court may deem proper. On February 23, 2017, the Court entered an order granting the Company’s motion to dismiss the Amended Class Action Complaint. On March 17, 2017, the case was dismissed with prejudice and resulted in no liability to the Company.

On February 8, 2017, the Attorney General of the State of Mississippi filed a lawsuit in the Circuit Court for the First Judicial District of Hinds County, Mississippi against the Company, Cornell Companies, Inc., a subsidiary of the Company, Christopher B. Epps, the former Commissioner of the Mississippi Department of Corrections, and Cecil McCrory, a former consultant of the Company. The complaint alleges several statutory and common law claims, including violations of various public servant statutes, racketeering activity, antitrust law, civil conspiracy, unjust enrichment and fraud. The complaint seeks compensatory damages, punitive damages, exemplary damages, forfeiture of all money received by the defendants, restitution, interest, attorneys’ fees, other costs, and such other expenses or damages as the court may deem proper. The complaint claims that between 2007 and 2014, the Company and Cornell Companies, Inc. received approximately $256 million in proceeds from public contracts paid for by the State of Mississippi. The Company intends to take all necessary steps to vigorously defend itself and Cornell Companies, Inc. The Company has not recorded an accrual relating to this matter at this time, as a loss is not considered probable nor reasonably estimable at this preliminary stage of the lawsuit.

On October 22, 2014, nine current and former civil immigration detainees who were detained at the Aurora Immigration Detention Center filed a purported class action lawsuit against the Company in the United States District Court for the District of Colorado (the “Court”). The complaint alleged that the Company was in violation of the Colorado Minimum Wages of Workers Act and the Trafficking Victims Protection Act, and claimed that the Company was unjustly enriched as a result of the level of payment that the detainees received for work performed at the facility, even though the voluntary work program as well as the wage rates and standards associated with the program that are at issue in this case are authorized by the Federal government under guidelines approved by the United States Congress. On July 6, 2015, the Court granted the Company’s motion to dismiss the claim against the Company under the Colorado Minimum Wages of Workers Act but otherwise denied the Company’s motion to dismiss. On February 27, 2017, the Court granted the plaintiffs’ motion for class certification. The Court ordered the parties to file a revised Proposed Stipulated Scheduling and Discovery Order by March 27, 2017 to proceed with the case. On March 13, 2017, GEO filed for permission to appeal this class certification order directly to the 10th Circuit Court of Appeal. On April 11, 2017, the 10th Circuit Court of Appeal granted GEO’s petition to hear the case. As a result, GEO has filed a motion to stay the proceedings in the trial court. Fact discovery in the case has not yet begun. The plaintiffs seek actual damages, compensatory damages, exemplary damages, punitive damages, restitution, attorneys’ fees and costs, and such other relief as the Court may deem proper. The Company intends to take all necessary steps to vigorously defend itself and has consistently refuted the allegations and claims in the lawsuit. The Company has not recorded an accrual relating to this matter at this time, as a loss is not considered probable nor reasonably estimable at this state of the lawsuit. If the Company had to change the level of compensation under the voluntary work program, or to substitute employee work for voluntary work, this could increase costs of operating these facilities.

The nature of the Company’s business exposes it to various types of third-party legal claims or litigation against the Company, including, but not limited to, civil rights claims relating to conditions of confinement and/or mistreatment, sexual misconduct claims brought by prisoners or detainees, medical malpractice claims, product liability claims, intellectual property infringement claims, claims relating to employment matters (including, but not limited to, employment discrimination claims, union grievances and wage and hour claims), property loss claims, environmental claims, automobile liability claims, indemnification claims by its customers and other third parties, contractual claims and claims for personal injury or other damages resulting from contact with the Company’s facilities, programs, electronic monitoring products, personnel or prisoners, including damages arising from a prisoner’s escape or from a disturbance or riot at a facility. The Company does not expect the outcome of any pending claims or legal proceedings to have a material adverse effect on its financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

A recently completed state non-income tax audit included tax periods for which a state tax authority had a number of years ago processed a substantial tax refund. At the completion of the audit fieldwork, the Company received a notice of audit findings disallowing deductions that were previously claimed by the Company, approved by the state tax authority and served as the basis for the approved refund claim. In early January 2017, the Company received a formal Notice of Assessment of Taxes and Demand for Payment from the taxing authority disallowing the deductions. The total tax, penalty and interest assessed is approximately $19.6 million. The Company has filed an administrative protest and disagrees with the assessment and intends to take all necessary steps to vigorously defend its position. The Company has established a reserve based on its estimate of the most probable loss based on the facts and circumstances known to date and the advice of outside counsel in connection with this matter.

The Company currently has contractual commitments for a number of projects using Company financing. The Company’s management estimates that the cost of these existing capital projects will be approximately ~~$109~~$196.3 million of which $6$46.8 million

was spent through the first ~~half~~six months of ~~2016.~~2017. The Company estimates the remaining capital requirements related to these capital projects will be ~~$103~~$149.5 million which will be spent through 2017. Included in these commitments is a contractual commitment to provide a capital contribution towards the design and construction of a prison project in Ravenhall, a locality near Melbourne, Australia, which is estimated to be approximately $84 million as of June 30, 2016. This capital contribution is expected to be made in January 2017.

Additionally, in connection with the Ravenhall Prison Project, the Company has a contractual commitment for construction of the facility and has entered into a syndicated facility agreement with National Australia Bank Limited to provide funding for the project up to AUD 791 million, or approximately $589 million, based on exchange rates as of June 30, 2016. Refer to Note 9 - Debt.2018.

~~The~~As of June 30, 2017, the Company is ~~currently~~ marketing approximately ~~3,300~~6,600 vacant beds at ~~four~~six of its idle facilities to potential customers. The carrying values of these idle facilities, which are included in Property and Equipment, Net in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets, totaled ~~$34.6~~$164.2 million as of June 30, ~~2016,~~2017, excluding equipment and other assets that can be easily transferred for use at other facilities. There was no indication of impairment related to the Company’s idle facilities at June 30, 2017.

The Company conducts its business through four reportable business segments: the U.S. Corrections & Detention segment; the GEO Care segment; the International Services segment; and the Facility Construction & Design segment. The Company’s segment revenues from external customers and a measure of segment profit are as follows (in thousands):


	Three Months Ended				Six Months Ended				Three Months Ended					Six Months Ended
	June 30, 2016		June 30, 2015		June 30, 2016		June 30, 2015		June 30, 2017			June 30, 2016		June 30, 2017			June 30, 2016
Revenues:
U.S. Corrections & Detention	$	341,573	$	304,329	$	679,943	$	589,938	$	360,838		$	341,573	$	708,769		$	679,943
GEO Care		96,529		82,658		189,943		162,014		139,364			96,529		243,130			189,943
International Services		38,497		38,543		76,052		79,197		42,928			38,497		84,620			76,052
Facility Construction & Design (1)		71,751		20,415		112,597		42,165		33,940			71,751		91,165			112,597

Total revenues	$	548,350	$	445,945	$	1,058,535	$	873,314	$	577,070		$	548,350	$	1,127,684		$	1,058,535

Operating income:
Operating income from segments:
U.S. Corrections & Detention	$	74,989	$	62,617	$	142,427	$	126,213	$	69,801		$	74,989	$	144,697		$	142,427
GEO Care		26,580		19,218		50,551		37,724		36,533			26,580		65,359			50,551
International Services		1,074		3,270		2,836		5,085		2,117			1,074		5,003			2,836
Facility Construction & Design (1)		218		350		275		952		(1,692	)		218		(1,342	)		275

Operating income from segments	$	102,861	$	85,455	$	196,089	$	169,974	$	106,759		$	102,861	$	213,717		$	196,089

The following is a reconciliation of the Company’s total operating income from its reportable segments to the Company’s income before income taxes and equity in earnings of affiliates (in thousands):


	Three Months Ended						Six Months Ended						Three Months Ended						Six Months Ended
	June 30, 2016			June 30, 2015			June 30, 2016			June 30, 2015			June 30, 2017			June 30, 2016			June 30, 2017			June 30, 2016
Total operating income from segments	$	102,861		$	85,455		$	196,089		$	169,974		$	106,759		$	102,861		$	213,717		$	196,089
Unallocated amounts:
General and Administrative Expenses		(36,904	)		(32,174	)		(70,965	)		(64,022	)		(52,206	)		(36,904	)		(94,792	)		(70,965	)
Net Interest Expense		(25,187	)		(23,783	)		(49,996	)		(46,356	)		(23,637	)		(25,187	)		(46,660	)		(49,996	)
Loss on Extinguishment of Debt		(15,866	)		—			(15,866	)		—			—			(15,866	)		—			(15,866	)

Income before income taxes and equity in earnings of affiliates	$	24,904		$	29,498		$	59,262		$	59,596		$	30,916		$	24,904		$	72,265		$	59,262

Equity in earnings of affiliates includes the Company’s 50% owned joint ventures in SACS, located in South Africa, and GEOAmey, located in the United Kingdom. The Company’s investments in these entities are accounted for under the equity method of accounting. The Company’s investments in these entities are presented as a component of Other Non-Current Assets in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.

The Company has recorded $1.2 million and $2.3 million in earnings, net of tax, for SACS operations during the three and six months ended June 30, 2017, and $0.9 million and $1.8 million in earnings, net of tax, for SACS operations during the three and six months ended June 30, 2016, ~~and $1.1 million and $2.2 million in earnings, net of tax, for SACS operations during the three and six months ended June 30, 2015,~~ respectively, which are included in equity in earnings of affiliates, net of income tax provision in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations. As of June 30, ~~2016~~2017 and December 31, ~~2015,~~2016, the Company’s investment in SACS was ~~$10.9~~$12.3 million and ~~$9.0~~$11.8 million, respectively.

The Company has recorded ~~$1.1~~$0.3 million and ~~$1.4~~$0.6 million in earnings, net of tax, for GEO Amey’s operation during the the three and six months ended June 30, ~~2016~~2017, and ~~less than $0.1~~$1.1 million and ~~$0.4~~$1.4 million in earnings, net of tax, ~~for GEOAmey’s operations~~ during the three and six months ended June 30, ~~2015,~~2016, respectively, ~~net of income tax provision,~~ in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations. As of June 30, ~~2016~~2017 and December 31, ~~2015,~~2016, the Company’s investment in GEOAmey was ~~$0.2~~$2.0 million and ~~$(1.2)~~$1.3 million, respectively, and represents its share of cumulative reported ~~losses. Losses in excess of the Company’s investment have been recognized as the Company has provided certain loans and guarantees to provide financial support to GEOAmey. Refer to Note 9 - Debt.~~earnings.

The following table summarizes key information related to the Company’s pension plans and retirement agreements (in thousands):

   Six Months Ended
June 30, 2016    Year Ended
December 31, 2015
Change in Projected Benefit Obligation

Projected benefit obligation, beginning of period
   $ 25,935       $ 25,826
Service cost
   497       1,173
Interest cost
   578       1,082
Actuarial gain
   —         (1,818 )
Benefits paid
   (168 )    (328 )




Projected benefit obligation, end of period
   $ 26,842       $ 25,935




Change in Plan Assets

Plan assets at fair value, beginning of period
   $ —         $ —
Company contributions
   168       328
Benefits paid
   (168 )    (328 )
Plan assets at fair value, end of period
   $ —         $ —




Unfunded Status of the Plan
   $ (26,842 )    $ (25,935 )

The long-term portion of the pension liability as of June 30, ~~2016~~2017 and December 31, ~~2015~~2016 was ~~$26.5~~$29.1 million and ~~$25.1~~$28.3 million, respectively, and is included in Other Non-Current Liabilities in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.

The Company implemented the following accounting standards during the six months ended June 30, ~~2016:~~

~~In April 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-03,~~~~“Interest-Imputation of Interest,”~~ which is intended to simplify the presentation of debt issuance costs. The amendments require that debt issuance costs related to a recognized debt liability be presented as a direct reduction from the carrying amount of that debt liability, consistent with debt discounts. The guidance in this update does not address presentation or subsequent measurement of debt issuance costs related to line-of-credit arrangements. Given the absence of authoritative guidance for debt issuance costs related to line-of-credit arrangements, the SEC staff would not object to an entity deferring and presenting debt issuance costs as an asset and subsequently amortizing the debt issuance costs ratable over the term of the line-of-credit agreement, regardless of whether there are any outstanding borrowings on the line-of-credit arrangement. In accordance with ASU No. 2015-03, the Company has applied the new guidance on a retrospective basis. As a result, the Company has reclassified debt issuance costs of $41.4 million and $41.1 million from Other Non-Current Assets to a direct reduction of Long-Term Debt and Non-Recourse Debt in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets at June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively. In accordance with the SEC guidance discussed above, the Company continues to present debt issuance costs related to its Revolver as an asset which is included in Other Non-Current Assets. The implementation of this standard during the six months ended June 30, 2016 did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows. Refer to Note 9 - Debt.

~~In November 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-17,~~~~“Income Taxes,”~~ which simplifies the presentation of deferred income taxes by requiring that all deferred income tax assets and liabilities be classified as non-current in a classified statement of financial position. ASU No. 2015-17 is effective for public companies for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016, and interim periods within those annual periods with earlier application permitted. The Company early adopted this standard during the six months ended June 30, 2016 on a prospective basis. Adoption of this ASU resulted in a reclassification of the Company’s net current deferred tax asset and net non-current deferred tax liability to the net non-current deferred tax asset in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet as of June 30, 2016. The prior reporting period was not retroactively adjusted. The implementation of this standard during the six months ended June 30, 2016 did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

~~In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-13, “~~~~Financial Instruments - Credit Losses,~~” which changes the methodology for recognizing credit losses for entities holding financial assets that are not accounted for at fair value through net income. The amendments in this update affect loans, debt securities, trade receivables, net investments in leases, off-balance sheet credit exposures, reinsurance receivables, and any other financial assets not excluded from the scope that have the contractual right to receive cash. The main objective of this update is to provide financial statement users with more decision-useful information about the expected credit losses on financial instruments and other commitments to extend credit held by a reporting entity at each reporting date. To achieve this objective, the amendments in this update replace the current incurred loss methodology with a methodology that reflects expected credit losses and requires consideration in a broader range of reasonable and supportable information to inform credit loss estimates. The amendments in ASU No. 2016-13 are effective for public companies for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2019, including interim periods within those fiscal years. The implementation of this standard is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

~~In April 2016, the FASB amended ASU No. 2016-10, “~~~~Revenue from Contracts with Customers~~,” which clarifies the implementation guidance on identifying performance obligations and the licensing implementation guidance, while retaining the related principles for those areas. This amendment clarifies that before an entity can identify its performance obligations in a contract with a customer, the entity first identifies the promised goods or services in the contract. An entity is not required to assess whether promised goods or services are performance obligations if they are immaterial in the context of the contract with the customer. Also, an entity is permitted, as an accounting policy to account for shipping and handling activities that occur after the customer has obtained control of a good as an activity to fulfill the promise to transfer the good rather than as an additional promised service. The amendment also includes implementation guidance on determining whether an entity’s promise to grant a license provides a customer with either a right to use the entity’s intellectual property (which is satisfied at a point in time) or a right to access the entity’s intellectual property (which is satisfied over time). The amendments in ASU No. 2016-08 are effective for public companies for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017. The Company is in the process of evaluating whether this standard would have a material impact on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows.2017:

In March 2016, the ~~FASB~~Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued ~~ASU~~Accounting Standard Update (“ASU”) No. 2016-09, ~~“Compensation-Stock~~“Compensation – Stock Compensation (Topic 718),” as a part of its ~~Simplification Initiative.~~simplification initiative. The Company adopted this ASU during the six months ended June 30, 2017. Key areas of the amendments in this standard are (i) all excess tax benefits (deficiencies) from stock plan transactions should be recognized in the income statement as opposed to being recognized in additional paid-in capital; (ii) the tax withholding threshold for triggering liability accounting on a net settlement transaction has been increased from the minimum statutory rate to the maximum statutory rate; and (iii) an entity can make an entity-wide accounting policy election to either estimate the number of awards that are expected to vest or account for forfeitures as they occur. The ~~amendments~~guidance also provides clarification of the presentation of certain components of share-based awards in ~~ASU No. 2016-09 are effective for public companies for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016, and interim periods within those annual periods. Earlier application is permitted.~~the statement of cash flows. The ~~implementation of this standard is not~~Company has elected to continue estimating forfeitures expected to ~~have~~occur in order to determine the amount of compensation cost to be recognized each period and to apply the cash flow classification guidance prospectively. As a ~~material impact on~~result, excess tax benefits are now classified as an operating activity rather than a financing activity and the ~~Company’s financial position, results~~Company has recorded $1.4 million of excess tax benefits from stock plan transactions as a component of income tax expense in the consolidated statement of operations ~~or cash flows.~~for the six months ended June 30, 2017. The Company has excluded the excess tax benefits from the assumed proceeds available to repurchase shares in the computation of its diluted earnings per share for the six months ended June 30, 2017.

In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU ~~No. 2016-08,~~2016-05, “~~Revenue from Contracts with Customers—Principal versus Agent Considerations (Reporting Revenue Gross versus Net),~~Derivatives and Hedging,” which clarifies that a change in the ~~implementation guidance on principal versus agent considerations. This amendment clarifies that when another~~counter party ~~is involved in providing goods or services~~ to a ~~customer, an entity is required to determine whether the nature~~derivative instrument that has been designated as a hedging instrument does not, in and of ~~its promise is to provide the specified good or service~~ itself, ~~(entity is a principal) or to arrange for~~require dedesignation of that ~~good or service~~hedging relationship provided that all other hedge accounting criteria continue to be ~~provided by~~met. The Company adopted this ASU during the ~~other party (entity is an agent). When (or as) an entity that is a principal satisfies a performance obligation,~~six months ended June 30, 2017 and elected to apply the entity recognizes revenue in the gross amount of consideration it expects to be entitled in exchange for the specified good or service transferred to the customer. When (or as) an entity that is an agent satisfies a performance obligation, the entity recognizes revenue in the amount of any fee or commission to which it expects to be entitled in exchange for arranging the specified good or service to be provided by the other party. An entity is a principal if it controls the specified good or service before that good or service is transferred to the customer. The guidance includes indicators to assist an entity in determining whether it controls a specified good or service before it is transferred to the customer. The amendments in ~~ASU No. 2016-08 are effective for public companies for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017. The Company is in the process of evaluating whether~~ this standard ~~would~~on a prospective basis. The implementation of this standard did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-07, “~~Investments-Equity~~Investments – Equity Method and Joint Ventures,” as a part of its ~~Simplification Initiative.~~simplification initiative. The amendments in this standard eliminate the requirement that when an investment qualifies for use of the equity method as a result of an increase in the level of ownership interest or degree of influence, an investor must adjust the investment, results of operations, and retained earnings retroactively on a step-by step basis as if the equity method had been in effect during all previous periods that the investment had been held. The amendments require that the equity method investor add the cost of acquiring the additional interest in the investee to the current basis of the investor’s previously held interest and adopt the equity method of accounting as of the date the investment becomes qualified for equity method accounting. Therefore, upon qualifying for the equity method of accounting, no retroactive adjustment of the investment is required. The amendments in ASU 2016-07 also require that an entity that has an available-for-sale equity security that becomes qualified for the equity method of accounting recognize through earnings the unrealized holding gain or loss in accumulated other comprehensive income at the date the investment becomes qualified for use of the equity method. The Company adopted this ASU during the six months ended June 30, 2017 and elected to apply the amendments in this standard on a prospective basis. The implementation of this standard did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

In October 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-17, “Consolidation – Interest Held through Related Parties that are Under Common Control,” which amends the current consolidation guidance on how a reporting entity that is the single decision maker of a variable interest entity (“VIE”) should treat indirect interests in the entity held through related parties that are under common control with the reporting entity when determining whether it is the primary beneficiary of that VIE. The primary beneficiary of a VIE is the reporting entity that has a controlling financial interest in a VIE, and therefore consolidates the VIE. A reporting entity has an indirect interest in a VIE if it has a direct interest in a related party that, in turn, has a direct interest in the VIE. The Company adopted this ASU during the six months ended June 30, 2017. The implementation of this standard did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

In May 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-10 “Service Concession Arrangements – Determining the Customer of the Operation Services”. The objective of this guidance is to reduce diversity in practice and provide clarification on how an operating entity determines the customer of the operation services for transactions within the scope of Topic 853, Service Concessions Arrangements. The amendments in this update clarify that the grantor is the customer of the operation services in all cases for such arrangements. The new standard is effective for the Company beginning on January 1, 2018. The adoption of this standard is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

In May 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-09 “Compensation – Stock Compensation”. The objective of this guidance is to provide clarity and reduce both (1) diversity in practice and (2) cost and complexity when applying modification accounting for changes in the terms or conditions of share-based payment awards. An entity should account for the effects of a modification unless all of the following factors are met: (i) the fair value of the modified award is the same as the fair value of the original award immediately before the award is modified; (ii) the vesting conditions of the modified award are the same as the vesting conditions of the original award immediately before the original award is modified; and (iii) the classification of the modified award as an equity instrument or a liability instrument is the same as the classification of the original award immediately before the original award is modified. The new standard will be effective for all entities for fiscal years ~~and interim periods within those fiscal years,~~ beginning after December 15, ~~2016.~~2017 with early adoption permitted for public companies for reporting periods for which financial statements have not yet been issued. The amendments in this update should be applied prospectively ~~upon their effective date~~ to ~~increases in the level of ownership interest~~an award modified on or ~~degree of influence that result in~~after the adoption ~~of the equity method. Earlier application is permitted.~~date. The ~~implementation~~adoption of this standard is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

In March ~~2016,~~2017, the FASB issued ASU ~~2016-05,~~No. 2017-07 “~~Derivatives~~Compensation – Retirement Benefits (Topic 715)-Improving the Presentation of Net Periodic Pension Cost and ~~Hedging,~~Net Periodic Postretirement Benefit Cost” ~~which clarifies~~. This guidance revises how employers that ~~a change~~sponsor defined benefit pension and other postretirement plans present the net periodic benefit cost in their income statement and requires that the service cost component of net periodic benefit cost be presented in the ~~counter party to a derivative instrument~~same income statement line items as other employee compensation costs from services rendered during the period. Of the components of net periodic benefit cost, only the service cost component will be eligible for asset capitalization. The other components of the net periodic benefit cost must be presented separately from the line items that ~~has been designated as~~include the ~~hedging instrument does not, in~~service cost and outside of ~~itself, require dedesignation~~any subtotal of ~~that hedging relationship provided that all other hedge accounting criteria continue to~~operating income on the income statement. The new standard will be ~~met. The amendments in ASU 2016-05 are~~ effective for public companies ~~for financial statements issued~~ for fiscal years beginning after December 15, ~~2016, and interim periods within those fiscal years. An entity has an option to apply the amendments in this standard~~2017 on ~~either~~ a ~~prospective basis or a modified retrospective basis, with early~~retroactive basis. Early adoption is permitted. The ~~implementation~~adoption of this standard is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

In February 2016, FASB issued ASU 2016-02, “Leases,” which requires entities to recognize lease assets and lease liabilities on the balance sheet and to disclose key information about leasing arrangements. For finance leases and operating leases, a lessee should recognize in the statement of financial position a liability to make lease payments (the lease liability) and a right-of-use asset representing its right to use the underlying asset for the lease term with each initially measured at the present value of the lease payments. The amendments in ASU 2016-02 are effective for public companies for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within those fiscal years. In transition, lessees and lessors are required to recognize and measure leases at the beginning of the earliest period presented using a modified retrospective approach. The Company has implemented a lease management software application tool and is currently assessing the impact that the adoption of ASU 2016-02 will have on its consolidated financial position or results of operations, but expects that it will result in a significant increase in its long-term assets and liabilities given the significant number of leases the Company is a party to.

In May 2014, the FASB issued a new standard related to revenue recognition (ASU 2014-09,“Revenue from Contracts with Customers.”) Under the new standard, revenue is recognized when a customer obtains control of promised goods or services and is recognized in an amount that reflects the consideration which the entity expects to receive in exchange for those goods or services. In addition, the standard requires disclosure of the nature, amount, timing, and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising from contracts with customers. The FASB has recently issued several amendments to the standard, including clarification on accounting for licenses of intellectual property and identifying performance obligations. The guidance permits two methods of adoption: retrospectively to each prior reporting period presented (full retrospective method), or retrospectively with the cumulative effect of initially applying the guidance recognized at the date of initial application (the modified retrospective transition method). The new standard is effective for the Company beginning on January 1, 2018. The Company is currently in the process of evaluating whether ~~this standard~~these standards would have a material impact on the Company’s financial position, results of operation or cash flows. However, upon its initial assessment, the Company believes that the timing of revenue recognition could potentially be affected as it relates to certain variable consideration arrangements with certain of its customers. However, at this time, the Company does not believe this would result in a material impact on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows. The Company has also initially determined that it will likely use the modified retrospective transition method to implement this standard, however, that election, as well as its analysis of any impacts related to variable consideration arrangements, may change once the Company’s final assessment is completed.

As of June 30, ~~2016,~~2017, the Company’s 6.00% Senior Notes, 5.125% Senior Notes, ~~and each of~~ the 5.875% Senior Notes due 2022 and the 5.875% Senior Notes due 2024 were fully and unconditionally guaranteed on a joint and several senior unsecured basis by the Company and certain of its wholly-owned domestic subsidiaries (the “Subsidiary Guarantors”). The following condensed consolidating financial information, which has been prepared in accordance with the requirements for presentation ofRule 3-10(d) of Regulation S-X promulgated under the Securities Act, presents the condensed consolidating financial information separately for:


	For the Three Months Ended June 30, 2016															For the Three Months Ended June 30, 2016
	The GEO Group, Inc.			Combined Subsidiary Guarantors			Combined Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries			Eliminations			Consolidated			The GEO Group, Inc.			Combined Subsidiary Guarantors			Combined Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries			Eliminations			Consolidated
Revenues	$	174,414		$	404,798		$	112,811		$	(143,673	)	$	548,350		$	174,414		$	404,798		$	112,811		$	(143,673	)	$	548,350
Operating expenses		135,603			323,791			101,116			(143,673	)		416,837			135,603			323,791			101,116			(143,673	)		416,837
Depreciation and amortization		6,265			21,424			963			—			28,652			6,265			21,424			963			—			28,652
General and administrative expenses		14,846			15,250			6,808			—			36,904			14,846			15,250			6,808			—			36,904

Operating income		17,700			44,333			3,924			—			65,957			17,700			44,333			3,924			—			65,957
Interest income		5,440			409			6,013			(5,960	)		5,902			5,440			409			6,013			(5,960	)		5,902
Interest expense		(16,369	)		(13,932	)		(6,748	)		5,960			(31,089	)		(16,369	)		(13,932	)		(6,748	)		5,960			(31,089	)
Loss on extinguishment of debt		(15,866	)		—			—			—			(15,866	)
Loss on early extinguishment of debt																	(15,866	)		—			—			—			(15,866	)

Income before income taxes and equity in earnings of affiliates		(9,095	)		30,810			3,189			—			24,904
Income tax provision		(101	)		3,099			881			—			3,879
Income (loss) before income taxes and equity in earnings of affiliates																	(9,095	)		30,810			3,189			—			24,904
Income tax provision (benefit)																	(101	)		3,099			881			—			3,879
Equity in earnings of affiliates, net of income tax provision		—			—			2,131			—			2,131			—			—			2,131			—			2,131

Income before equity in income of consolidated subsidiaries		(8,994	)		27,711			4,439			—			23,156
Income (loss) before equity in income of consolidated subsidiaries																	(8,994	)		27,711			4,439			—			23,156
Income from consolidated subsidiaries, net of income tax provision		32,150			—			—			(32,150	)		—			32,150			—			—			(32,150	)		—

Net income		23,156			27,711			4,439			(32,150	)		23,156			23,156			27,711			4,439			(32,150	)		23,156
Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interests		—			—			53			—			53			—			—			53			—			53

Net income attributable to The GEO Group, Inc.	$	23,156		$	27,711		$	4,492		$	(32,150	)	$	23,209		$	23,156		$	27,711		$	4,492		$	(32,150	)	$	23,209

Net income	$	23,156		$	27,711		$	4,439		$	(32,150	)	$	23,156		$	23,156		$	27,711		$	4,439		$	(32,150	)	$	23,156
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax		—			33			(2,611	)		—			(2,578	)		—			33			(2,611	)		—			(2,578	)

Total comprehensive income	$	23,156		$	27,744		$	1,828		$	(32,150	)	$	20,578		$	23,156		$	27,744		$	1,828		$	(32,150	)	$	20,578
Comprehensive loss attributable to noncontrolling interests		—			—			52			—			52			—			—			52			—			52

Comprehensive income attributable to The GEO Group, Inc.	$	23,156		$	27,744		$	1,880		$	(32,150	)	$	20,630		$	23,156		$	27,744		$	1,880		$	(32,150	)	$	20,630

~~CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)~~


	For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2017
	The GEO Group, Inc.			Combined Subsidiary Guarantors			Combined Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries			Eliminations			Consolidated
Revenues	$	349,433		$	878,480		$	180,920		$	(281,149	)	$	1,127,684
Operating expenses		267,411			711,398			155,492			(281,149	)		853,152
Depreciation and amortization		12,215			46,781			1,819			—			60,815
General and administrative expenses		29,240			50,413			15,139			—			94,792

Operating income		40,567			69,888			8,470			—			118,925
Interest income		10,105			1,229			24,304			(11,315	)		24,323
Interest expense		(33,243	)		(28,260	)		(20,795	)		11,315			(70,983	)

Income before income taxes and equity in earnings of affiliates		17,429			42,857			11,979			—			72,265
Income tax provision (benefit)		294			2,247			1,329			—			3,870
Equity in earnings of affiliates, net of income tax provision		—			—			2,913			—			2,913

Income before equity in income of consolidated subsidiaries		17,135			40,610			13,563			—			71,308
Income from consolidated subsidiaries, net of income tax provision		57,749			—			—			(57,749	)		—

Net income		74,884			40,610			13,563			(57,749	)		71,308
Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interests		—			—			87			—			87

Net income attributable to The GEO Group, Inc.	$	74,884		$	40,610		$	13,650		$	(57,749	)	$	71,395

Net income	$	74,884		$	40,610		$	13,563		$	(57,749	)	$	71,308
Other comprehensive income, net of tax		—			111			3,022			—			3,133

Total comprehensive income	$	74,884		$	40,721		$	16,585		$	(57,749	)	$	74,441
Comprehensive loss attributable to noncontrolling interests		—			—			85			—			85

Comprehensive income attributable to The GEO Group, Inc.	$	74,884		$	40,721		$	16,670		$	(57,749	)	$	74,526

~~CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)~~


	For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2015															For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2016
	The GEO Group, Inc.			Combined Subsidiary Guarantors			Combined Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries			Eliminations			Consolidated			The GEO Group, Inc.			Combined Subsidiary Guarantors			Combined Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries			Eliminations			Consolidated
Revenues	$	305,748		$	707,369		$	126,488		$	(266,291	)	$	873,314		$	342,051		$	805,140		$	193,776		$	(282,432	)	$	1,058,535
Operating expenses		257,548			555,195			105,387			(266,291	)		651,839			273,513			643,695			170,567			(282,432	)		805,343
Depreciation and amortization		12,585			36,879			2,037			—			51,501			12,527			42,657			1,919			—			57,103
General and administrative expenses		21,372			33,808			8,842			—			64,022			22,821			35,216			12,928			—			70,965

Operating income (loss)		14,243			81,487			10,222			—			105,952
Operating income																	33,190			83,572			8,362			—			125,124
Interest income		11,914			2,078			5,319			(14,370	)		4,941			10,881			1,018			10,670			(12,110	)		10,459
Interest expense		(29,847	)		(29,379	)		(6,441	)		14,370			(51,297	)		(32,726	)		(27,876	)		(11,963	)		12,110			(60,455	)
Loss on early extinguishment of debt																	(15,866	)		—			—			—			(15,866	)

Income (loss) before income taxes and equity in earnings of affiliates		(3,690	)		54,186			9,100			—			59,596			(4,521	)		56,714			7,069			—			59,262
Income tax (benefit) provision		(61	)		3,328			1,929			—			5,196
Income tax provision (benefit)																	(91	)		5,290			1,831			—			7,030
Equity in earnings of affiliates, net of income tax provision		—			—			2,610			—			2,610			—			—			3,250			—			3,250
Income (loss) from continuing operations before equity in income of consolidated subsidiaries		(3,629	)		50,858			9,781			—			57,010

Income (loss) before equity in income of consolidated subsidiaries																	(4,430	)		51,424			8,488			—			55,482
Income from consolidated subsidiaries, net of income tax provision		60,639			—			—			(60,639	)		—			59,912			—			—			(59,912	)		—

Net income	$	57,010		$	50,858		$	9,781		$	(60,639	)	$	57,010			55,482			51,424			8,488			(59,912	)		55,482
Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interests		—			—			58			—			58			—			—			77			—			77

Net income attributable to The GEO Group, Inc.	$	57,010		$	50,858		$	9,839		$	(60,639	)	$	57,068		$	55,482		$	51,424		$	8,565		$	(59,912	)	$	55,559

Net income	$	57,010		$	50,858		$	9,781		$	(60,639	)	$	57,010		$	55,482		$	51,424		$	8,488		$	(59,912	)	$	55,482
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax		—			77			(951	)		—			(874	)		—			65			(3,541	)		—			(3,476	)

Total comprehensive income	$	57,010		$	50,935		$	8,830		$	(60,639	)	$	56,136			55,482			51,489			4,947			(59,912	)		52,006
Comprehensive loss attributable to noncontrolling interests		—			—			81			—			81			—			—			68			—			68

Comprehensive income attributable to The GEO Group, Inc.	$	57,010		$	50,935		$	8,911		$	(60,639	)	$	56,217		$	55,482		$	51,489		$	5,015		$	(59,912	)	$	52,074


		As of June 30, 2016
		The GEO Group, Inc.		Combined Subsidiary Guarantors		Combined Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries		Eliminations			Consolidated			As of June 30, 2017
														The GEO Group, Inc.			Combined Subsidiary Guarantors		Combined Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries			Eliminations			Consolidated
ASSETS	ASSETS												ASSETS
Cash and cash equivalents		$	14,727	$	—	$	24,138	$	—		$	38,865		$	30,576		$	6,882	$	28,443		$	—		$	65,901
Restricted cash and investments			—		—		72,453		—			72,453			1,849			—		15,529			—			17,378
Accounts receivable, less allowance for doubtful accounts			110,299		172,229		14,725		—			297,253			112,978			213,596		15,787			—			342,361
Current deferred income tax assets			—		—		—		—			—
Contract receivable, current portion															—			—		238,958			—			238,958
Prepaid expenses and other current assets			3,982		18,983		7,419		(1,312	)		29,072			2,249			34,588		5,630			—			42,467

Total current assets			129,008		191,212		118,735		(1,312	)		437,643			147,652			255,066		304,347			—			707,065

Restricted Cash and Investments			150		17,951		4,435		—			22,536			(1,659	)		22,632		2,047			—			23,020
Property and Equipment, Net			738,819		1,093,039		81,812		—			1,913,670			744,674			1,217,685		87,254			—			2,049,613
Contract Receivable			—		—		302,575		—			302,575
Non-Current Contract Receivable															—			—		358,727			—			358,727
Intercompany Receivable			1,000,004		101,871		3,087		(1,104,962	)		—			1,122,898			93,918		28,658			(1,245,474	)		—
Non-Current Deferred Income Tax Assets			713		11,898		11,543		—			24,154			763			19,685		11,814			—			32,262
Goodwill			79		614,941		426		—			615,446			79			787,284		440			—			787,803
Intangible Assets, Net			—		213,281		742		—			214,023			—			267,580		765			—			268,345
Investment in Subsidiaries			1,098,855		453,636		2,190		(1,554,681	)		—			1,315,016			457,591		2,190			(1,774,797	)		—
Other Non-Current Assets			16,298		110,789		23,317		(80,005	)		70,399			13,417			112,567		20,589			(79,640	)		66,933

Total Assets		$	2,983,926	$	2,808,618	$	548,862	$	(2,740,960	)	$	3,600,446		$	3,342,840		$	3,234,008	$	816,831		$	(3,099,911	)	$	4,293,768


LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY	LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Accounts payable		$	8,368	$	53,802	$	30,466	$	—		$	92,636		$	20,438		$	60,099	$	17,490		$	—		$	98,027
Accrued payroll and related taxes			—		36,849		13,684		—			50,533			—			47,674		15,518			—			63,192
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities			39,067		77,585		13,209		(1,312	)		128,549			37,066			100,691		16,173			—			153,930
Current portion of capital lease obligations, long-term debt and non-recourse debt			3,000		1,532		12,618		—			17,150			8,000			1,746		245,658			—			255,404

Total current liabilities			50,435		169,768		69,977		(1,312	)		288,868			65,504			210,210		294,839			—			570,553

Non-Current Deferred Income Tax Liabilities			—		—		—		—			—
Intercompany Payable			92,498		1,000,527		11,937		(1,104,962	)		—			35,092			1,174,881		35,501			(1,245,474	)		—
Other Non-Current Liabilities			4,246		142,534		25,516		(80,005	)		92,291			4,725			155,895		17,761			(79,640	)		98,741
Capital Lease Obligations			—		8,075		—		—			8,075			—			6,787		—			—			6,787
Long-Term Debt			1,869,281		—		—		—			1,869,281			2,018,040			—		89,168			—			2,107,208
Non-Recourse Debt			—		—		374,434		—			374,434			—			—		283,780			—			283,780
Commitments & Contingencies and Other
Shareholders’ Equity:
The GEO Group, Inc. Shareholders’ Equity			967,466		1,487,714		66,967		(1,554,681	)		967,466			1,219,479			1,686,235		95,966			(1,774,797	)		1,226,883
Noncontrolling Interests			—		—		31		—			31			—			—		(184	)		—			(184	)

Total Shareholders’ Equity			967,466		1,487,714		66,998		(1,554,681	)		967,497			1,219,479			1,686,235		95,782			(1,774,797	)		1,226,699

Total Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity		$	2,983,926	$	2,808,618	$	548,862	$	(2,740,960	)	$	3,600,446		$	3,342,840		$	3,234,008	$	816,831		$	(3,099,911	)	$	4,293,768


		As of December 31, 2015
		The GEO Group, Inc.		Combined Subsidiary Guarantors			Combined Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries		Eliminations			Consolidated		As of December 31, 2016
														The GEO Group, Inc.		Combined Subsidiary Guarantors		Combined Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries			Eliminations			Consolidated
ASSETS	ASSETS
Cash and cash equivalents		$	37,077	$	—		$	22,561	$	—		$	59,638	$	45,566	$	842	$	21,630		$	—		$	68,038
Restricted cash and investments			—		—			8,489		—			8,489		—		—		17,133			—			17,133
Accounts receivable, less allowance for doubtful accounts			131,747		162,538			19,812		—			314,097		139,571		200,239		16,445			—			356,255
Current deferred income tax assets			—		23,120			4,794		—			27,914
Contract receivable, current portion															—		—		224,033			—			224,033
Prepaid expenses and other current assets			1,190		17,917			10,310		(1,209	)		28,208		677		24,096		7,437			—			32,210

Total current assets			170,014		203,575			65,966		(1,209	)		438,346		185,814		225,177		286,678			—			697,669

Restricted Cash and Investments			138		16,386			3,712		—			20,236		170		19,742		936			—			20,848
Property and Equipment, Net			746,478		1,088,417			81,491		—			1,916,386		735,104		1,078,220		83,917			—			1,897,241
Direct Finance Lease Receivable			—		—			1,826		—			1,826
Contract Receivable			—		—			174,141					174,141
Non-Current Contract Receivable															—		—		219,783						219,783
Intercompany Receivable			971,291		86,519			—		(1,057,810	)		—		918,527		141,987		27,290			(1,087,804	)		—
Non-Current Deferred Income Tax Assets			710		(102	)		6,791		—			7,399		764		17,918		11,357			—			30,039
Goodwill			79		614,941			418		—			615,438		79		614,941		413			—			615,433
Intangible Assets, Net			—		223,426			722		—			224,148		—		203,138		746			—			203,884
Investment in Subsidiaries			1,106,546		453,636			—		(1,560,182	)		—		1,238,772		453,635		2,190			(1,694,597	)		—
Other Non-Current Assets			2,387		116,561			25,486		(80,127	)		64,307		15,011		108,434		20,933			(79,866	)		64,512

Total Assets		$	2,997,643	$	2,803,359		$	360,553	$	(2,699,328	)	$	3,462,227	$	3,094,241	$	2,863,192	$	654,243		$	(2,862,267	)	$	3,749,409


LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY	LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Accounts payable		$	9,731	$	54,675		$	13,117	$	—		$	77,523	$	8,402	$	50,200	$	21,035		$	—		$	79,637
Accrued payroll and related taxes			—		35,516			12,961		—			48,477		—		41,230		14,030			—			55,260
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities			43,043		78,510			15,139		(1,209	)		135,483		36,792		83,906		10,398			—			131,096
Current portion of capital lease obligations, long-term debt and non-recourse debt			3,000		1,477			12,664		—			17,141		3,000		1,700		233,365			—			238,065

Total current liabilities			55,774		170,178			53,881		(1,209	)		278,624		48,194		177,036		278,828			—			504,058

Non-Current Deferred Income Tax Liabilities					11,120			351		—			11,471
Intercompany Payable			76,427		967,048			14,335		(1,057,810	)		—		133,039		920,825		33,940			(1,087,804	)		—
Other Non-Current Liabilities			2,894		143,887			21,040		(80,127	)		87,694		2,487		144,383		21,652			(79,866	)		88,656
Capital Lease Obligations			—		8,693			—		—			8,693		—		7,431		—			—			7,431
Long-Term Debt			1,855,810		—			—		—			1,855,810		1,935,465		—		—			—			1,935,465
Non-Recourse Debt			—		—			213,098		—			213,098		—		—		238,842			—			238,842
Commitments & Contingencies and Other
Shareholders’ Equity:
The GEO Group, Inc. Shareholders’ Equity			1,006,738		1,502,433			57,749		(1,560,182	)		1,006,738		975,056		1,613,517		81,080			(1,694,597	)		975,056
Noncontrolling Interests			—		—			99		—			99		—		—		(99	)		—			(99	)

Total Shareholders’ Equity			1,006,738		1,502,433			57,848		(1,560,182	)		1,006,837		975,056		1,613,517		80,981			(1,694,597	)		974,957

Total Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity		$	2,997,643	$	2,803,359		$	360,553	$	(2,699,328	)	$	3,462,227	$	3,094,241	$	2,863,192	$	654,243		$	(2,862,267	)	$	3,749,409


	For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2016												For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2017
	The GEO Group, Inc.			Combined Subsidiary Guarantors			Combined Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries			Consolidated			The GEO Group, Inc.			Combined Subsidiary Guarantors			Combined Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries			Consolidated
Cash Flow from Operating Activities:
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities	$	84,523		$	40,602		$	(86,873	)	$	38,252

Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities													$	2,389		$	62,559		$	(14,234	)	$	50,714

Cash Flow from Investing Activities:
Acquisition of CEC, net of cash acquired														(354,466	)		—			—			(354,466	)
Proceeds from sale of property and equipment		—			41			2			43			648			—			—			648
Insurance proceeds - damaged property		—			—			548			548
Change in restricted cash and investments		(12	)		(1,565	)		(64,276	)		(65,853	)		—			(2,890	)		1,055			(1,835	)
Capital expenditures		(5,137	)		(39,078	)		(1,799	)		(46,014	)		(9,709	)		(53,629	)		(4,170	)		(67,508	)

Net cash used in investing activities		(5,149	)		(40,602	)		(65,525	)		(111,276	)
Net (cash used) provided by in investing activities														(363,527	)		(56,519	)		(3,115	)		(423,161	)

Cash Flow from Financing Activities:
Proceeds from long-term debt		641,000			—			—			641,000			1,158,574			—			—			1,158,574
Payments on long-term debt		(627,506	)		—			—			(627,506	)		(972,500	)		—			—			(972,500	)
Payments on non-recourse debt		—			—			(3,044	)		(3,044	)		—			—			(67,885	)		(67,885	)
Proceeds from non-recourse debt		—			—			159,068			159,068			—			—			91,076			91,076
Taxes paid related to net share settlements of equity awards		(2,257	)		—			—			(2,257	)		(4,092	)		—			—			(4,092	)
Proceeds from issuance of common stock in connection with ESPP		—						224			224			—						242			242
Proceeds from issuance of common stock under prospectus supplement														275,867			—			—			275,867
Debt issuance costs		(16,980	)		—			(2,517	)		(19,497	)		(6,992	)		—			(595	)		(7,587	)
Tax deficiency related to equity compensation		(791	)		—			—			(791	)
Proceeds from stock options exercised		2,057			—			—			2,057			6,150			—			—			6,150
Cash dividends paid		(97,247	)					—			(97,247	)
Dividends paid														(110,859	)					—			(110,859	)

Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities		(101,724	)		—			153,731			52,007			346,148			—			22,838			368,986

Effect of Exchange Rate Changes on Cash and Cash Equivalents		—			—			244			244			—			—			1,324			1,324

Net Decrease in Cash and Cash Equivalents		(22,350	)		—			1,577			(20,773	)
Net (Decrease) Increase in Cash and Cash Equivalents														(14,990	)		6,040			6,813			(2,137	)
Cash and Cash Equivalents, beginning of period		37,077			—			22,561			59,638			45,566			842			21,630			68,038

Cash and Cash Equivalents, end of period	$	14,727		$	—		$	24,138		$	38,865		$	30,576		$	6,882		$	28,443		$	65,901


	For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2015												For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2016
	The GEO Group, Inc.			Combined Subsidiary Guarantors			Combined Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries			Consolidated			The GEO Group, Inc.			Combined Subsidiary Guarantors			Combined Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries			Consolidated
Cash Flow from Operating Activities:
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities	$	39,103		$	62,486		$	(21,791	)	$	79,798

Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities													$	84,523		$	40,602		$	(86,873	)	$	38,252

Cash Flow from Investing Activities:
Acquisition of SoberLink, cash consideration					(24,402	)					(24,402	)
Acquisition of LCS, net of cash acquired		(307,403	)					—			(307,403	)
Proceeds from sale of property and equipment		—			123			—			123			—			41			2			43
Insurance proceeds - damaged property		—			901			—			901
Acquisition of LCS, net of cash acquired		(307,403	)					—			(307,403	)
Insurance proceeds – damaged property														—			—			548			548
Change in restricted cash and investments		(97	)		2,396			(7,716	)		(5,417	)		(12	)		(1,565	)		(64,276	)		(65,853	)
Capital expenditures		(36,367	)		(34,273	)		(1,054	)		(71,694	)		(5,137	)		(39,078	)		(1,799	)		(46,014	)

Net cash used in investing activities		(343,867	)		(55,255	)		(8,770	)		(407,892	)		(5,149	)		(40,602	)		(65,525	)		(111,276	)

Cash Flow from Financing Activities:
Taxes paid related to net share settlements of equity awards		(1,784	)		—			—			(1,784	)		(2,257	)		—			—			(2,257	)
Proceeds from long-term debt		518,000			—			—			518,000			641,000			—			—			641,000
Payments on long-term debt		(134,744	)					—			(134,744	)		(627,506	)					—			(627,506	)
Payments on non-recourse debt		—			—			(4,513	)		(4,513	)		—			—			(3,044	)		(3,044	)
Proceeds from non-recourse debt		—			—			49,731			49,731			—			—			159,068			159,068
Proceeds from issuance of common stock in connection with ESPP		218			—			—			218			—			—			224			224
Debt issuance costs					—			(2,438	)		(2,438	)		(16,980	)		—			(2,517	)		(19,497	)
Tax benefit related to equity compensation		651			—			—			651			(791	)		—			—			(791	)
Proceeds from stock options exercised		2,037			—			—			2,037			2,057			—			—			2,057
Cash dividends paid		(92,254	)		—			—			(92,254	)
Dividends paid														(97,247	)		—			—			(97,247	)

Net cash provided by financing activities		292,124			—			42,780			334,904
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities														(101,724	)		—			153,731			52,007

Effect of Exchange Rate Changes on Cash and Cash Equivalents		—			—			(1,103	)		(1,103	)		—			—			244			244

Net Increase (Decrease) in Cash and Cash Equivalents		(12,640	)		7,231			11,116			5,707
Net Decrease in Cash and Cash Equivalents														(22,350	)		—			1,577			(20,773	)
Cash and Cash Equivalents, beginning of period		18,492			782			22,063			41,337			37,077			—			22,561			59,638

Cash and Cash Equivalents, end of period	$	5,852		$	8,013		$	33,179		$	47,044		$	14,727		$	—		$	24,138		$	38,865

On July ~~20, 2016,~~10, 2017, the Board of Directors declared a quarterly cash dividend of ~~$0.65~~$0.47 per share of common stock which ~~is to be~~was paid on ~~August 12, 2016~~July 28, 2017 to shareholders of record as of the close of business on ~~August 1, 2016.~~July 21, 2017.

~~ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS.~~

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and the documents incorporated by reference herein contain “forward-looking” statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. “Forward-looking” statements are any statements that are not based on historical information. Statements other than statements of historical facts included in this report, including, without limitation, statements regarding our future financial position, business strategy, budgets, projected costs and plans and objectives of management for future operations, are “forward-looking” statements. Forward-looking statements generally can be identified by the use of forward-looking terminology such as “may,” “will,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “intend,” “plan,” “believe,” “seek,” “estimate” or “continue” or the negative of such words or variations of such words and similar expressions. These statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve certain risks, uncertainties and assumptions, which are difficult to predict. Therefore, actual outcomes and results may differ materially from what is expressed or forecasted in such forward-looking statements and we can give no assurance that such forward-looking statements will prove to be correct. Important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements, or “cautionary statements,” include, but are not limited to:

We undertake no obligation to update publicly any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. All subsequent written and oral forward-looking statements attributable to us, or persons acting on our behalf, are expressly qualified in their entirety by the cautionary statements included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

The following discussion and analysis provides information which management believes is relevant to an assessment and understanding of our consolidated results of operations and financial condition. This discussion contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. Our actual results may differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements as a result of numerous factors including, but not limited to, those described above under “Forward-Looking Information”, those described below under “Part II -– Item 1A. Risk Factors” and under “Part I -– Item 1A. Risk Factors” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, ~~2015.~~2016. The discussion should be read in conjunction with our unaudited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

We are a real estate investment trust (“REIT”) specializing in the ownership, leasing and management of correctional, detention and reentry facilities and the provision of community-based services and youth services in the United States, Australia, South Africa, and the United Kingdom. We own, lease and operate a broad range of correctional and detention facilities including maximum, medium and minimum security prisons, immigration detention centers, minimum security detention centers, and community based reentry facilities and we offer an expanded delivery of offender rehabilitation services under our ‘GEO Continuum of Care’ platform. We offer counseling, education and/or treatment to inmates with alcohol and drug abuse problems at most of the domestic facilities we manage. We are also a provider of innovative compliance technologies, industry-leading monitoring services, and evidence-based supervision and treatment programs for community-based parolees, probationers and pretrial defendants.

At June 30, 2017, after our acquisition of CEC, our worldwide operations include the management and/or ownership of approximately ~~87,000~~100,000 beds at ~~104~~143 correctional, detention and reentry facilities, including idle facilities, projects under development and recently awarded contracts, and also include the provision of community supervision services for more than ~~139,000~~185,000 offenders and pre-trial defendants, including approximately ~~83,000~~100,000 individuals through an array of technology products including radio frequency, GPS, and alcohol monitoring devices.

For the six months ended June 30, ~~2016~~2017 and June 30, ~~2015,~~2016, we had consolidated revenues of ~~$1,058.5~~$1,127.7 million and ~~$873.3~~$1,058.5 million, respectively, and we maintained an average company wide facility occupancy rate of ~~92.4%~~91.8% including ~~83,943~~91,777 active beds and excluding ~~3,426~~8,170 idle beds (including those being marketed to potential customers) and beds under development for the six months ended June 30, ~~2016,~~2017, and ~~93.1%~~92.4% including ~~82,646~~82,643 active beds and excluding ~~3,740~~4,726 idle beds (including those being marketed to potential customers) and beds under development for the six months ended June 30, ~~2015.~~2016.

As a REIT, we are required to distribute annually at least 90% of our REIT taxable income (determined without regard to the dividends paid deduction and by excluding net capital gain) and we began paying regular quarterly REIT dividends in 2013. The amount, timing and frequency of future dividends, however, will be at the sole discretion of our Board of Directors (the “Board”) and will be declared based upon various factors, many of which are beyond our control, including, our financial condition and operating cash flows, the amount required to maintain REIT status, limitations on distributions in our existing and future debt instruments, limitations on our ability to fund distributions using cash generated through our taxable REIT subsidiaries (“TRSs”) and other factors that our Board may deem relevant.

During the six months ended June 30, ~~2016~~2017 and the year ended December 31, ~~2015,~~2016, respectively, we declared and paid the following regular cash distributions to our shareholders as follows:

On July ~~20, 2016,~~10, 2017, our Board of Directors declared a quarterly cash dividend of ~~$0.65~~$0.47 per share of common stock, which ~~is to be~~was paid on ~~August 12, 2016~~July 28, 2017 to shareholders of record as of the close of business on ~~August 1, 2016.~~July 21, 2017.

Reference is made to Part II, Item 7 of our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on February ~~26, 2016,~~27, 2017, for further discussion and analysis of information pertaining to our financial condition and results of operations as of and for the fiscal year ended December 31, ~~2015.~~2016.

In March 2017, our Board of Directors declared a 3-for-2 stock split of our common stock. The stock split was effective on April 24, 2017 with respect to shareholders of record on April 10, 2017. Outstanding share and per-share amounts disclosed for all periods presented have been retroactively adjusted to reflect the effects of the stock split. On April 24, 2017, the Company amended its articles of incorporation to increase the number of authorized shares of common stock to take into effect the stock split.

On March 7, 2017, we entered into an underwriting agreement related to the issuance and sale of 9,000,000 shares of our common stock, par value $.01 per share. The offering price to the public was $27.80 per share and the underwriters agreed to purchase the shares from us pursuant to the underwriting agreement at a price of $26.70 per share. In addition, under the terms of the underwriting agreement, we granted the underwriters an option, exercisable for thirty days, to purchase up to an additional 1,350,000 shares of common stock. On March 8, 2017, the underwriters exercised in full their option to purchase the additional 1,350,000 shares of common stock. On March 13, 2017, we completed the sale of 10,350,000 shares of common stock pursuant to our underwritten public offering. We received gross proceeds (before underwriting discounts and estimated offering expenses) of approximately $288.1 million from the offering, including approximately $37.6 million in connection with the sale of the additional shares. The 10,350,000 shares of common stock were issued under our currently effective shelf registration filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The net proceeds of this offering were used to repay amounts outstanding under our revolver portion of our senior credit facility and for general corporate purposes. The number of shares and per-share amounts herein have been adjusted to reflect the effects of the stock split.

On ~~May 19, 2016 (the “Amendment Effective Date”~~April 5, 2017, we closed on our previously announced acquisition of Community Education Centers (“CEC”), ~~we executed Amendment No. 1, among GEO~~a leading private provider of rehabilitation services for offenders in reentry and ~~GEO Corrections Holdings, Inc. (together with GEO, the “Borrowers”), GEO Australasia Holdings Pty Ltd (“GEO Australasia Holdings”), GEO Australasia Finance Holdings Pty Ltd~~in-prison treatment facilities as ~~trustee~~well as management services for ~~the GEO Australasia Finance Holding Trust (the “Australian Trust”) (the “Australian Trustee”,~~county, state and ~~together with GEO Australasia Holdings, collectively, the “Australian Borrowers”), the guarantors party thereto, the issuing lenders party thereto, the lenders party thereto~~federal correctional and BNP Paribas, as administrative agent (the “Amendment”), to the Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of August 27, 2014, by and among the Borrowers, BNP Paribas, as administrative agent, and the lenders who are, or may from time to time become, a party thereto (the “Existing Credit Agreement”).

~~The Amendment amends certain terms of the Existing Credit Agreement to effect a revolving credit increase in the amount of $200.0~~detention facilities. We acquired CEC for $360 million increases to the total leverage thresholds used in the determination of the applicable interest rates, and certain other modifications (the Existing Credit Agreement as so modified, the “Amended Credit Agreement”).

The Amendment provides that each lender (including each Increasing Lender and each Assuming Lender as defined in the Amended Credit Agreement) that executed a lender addendum as a revolving credit lender agrees to provide a revolving credit commitment, inclusive of letters of credit issued thereunder, to the Borrowers at the Amendment Effective Time in an aggregate principal amount equal to $900.0 million (the“Revolving Credit Commitment”) on the terms set forth in the Amended Credit Agreement. In addition, the Amendment increases the principal amount of letters of credit that may be issued under the Revolving Credit Commitment from $175.0 million to $300.0 million.all cash transaction, excluding transaction related expenses. CEC’s operations encompass over 12,000 beds nationwide. Refer to Note ~~9 - Debt of~~2-Business Combinations in the Notes to the Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part I, Item 1 of this Quarterly Report onForm ~~10-Q for further discussion.~~10-Q.

On April 18, 2016, we completed an offering of $350 million aggregate principal amount of 6.00% senior notes due 2026 (the “6.00% Senior Notes”). The 6.00% Senior Notes were offered and sold in a registered offering pursuant to an underwriting agreement, dated as of April 11, 2016 (the “Underwriting Agreement”) among GEO, certain of the Company’s domestic subsidiaries, as guarantors and Wells Fargo Securities, LLC, as representative for the underwriters named therein. The 6.00% Senior Notes were issued by us pursuant to the Indenture, dated as of September 25, 2014 (the “Base Indenture”), by and between GEO and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as trustee, as supplemented by a Second Supplemental Indenture, dated as of April 18, 2016 (the “Second Supplemental Indenture” and together with the Base Indenture, the “Indenture”), by and among GEO, the guarantors and the trustee which governs the terms of the 6.00% Senior Notes. The sale of the 6.00% Senior Notes was registered under our existing shelf registration statement on Form S-3 filed on September 12, 2014, as amended (File No. 333-198729). The 6.00% Senior Notes were issued at a coupon rate and yield to maturity of 6.00%. Interest on the 6.00% Senior Notes is payable semi-annually on April 15 and October 15 of each year, commencing on October 15, 2016. The 6.00% Senior Notes mature on April 15, 2026. We used part of the net proceeds to fund the tender offer or the repurchase, redemption or other discharge of any and all of our 6.625% Senior Notes (see discussion below), to pay all related fees, costs and expenses and for general corporate purposes including repaying borrowings under our Revolver. Loan costs of $6 million were incurred and capitalized in connection with the offering. Refer to Note 9 - Debt of the Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part I, Item 1 of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for further discussion.

~~On April 11, 2016,~~13, 2017, we announced that we ~~had commenced~~have been awarded a ~~cash tender offer~~contract by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (“ICE”) for ~~any~~the development and ~~all~~operation of ~~our $300.0 million aggregate principal amount~~a new company-owned 1,000-bed detention facility to be located in Conroe,

Texas. We expect to design, finance, build and operate the facility under a ten-year contract with ICE, inclusive of ~~our 6.625% senior unsecured notes due 2021 (“6.625% Senior Notes”). On April 18, 2016, we completed~~renewal option periods. The facility is scheduled for completion in the ~~purchase~~fourth quarter of ~~$231.0~~2018 and is expected to generate approximately $44 million in ~~aggregate principal amount of our 6.625% Senior Notes validly tendered in connection~~annual revenues and returns on investment consitent with our ~~tender offer on or prior to the expiration time.~~ company-owned facilities.

On May ~~20, 2016,~~26, 2017, we ~~completed~~announced that we were awarded two ten-year contracts, inclusive of renewal option periods, by the ~~redemption~~Federal Bureau of Prisons (“BOP”) for the continued housing of criminal aliens under the custody of the ~~remaining 6.625% Senior Notes~~BOP at the company- owned1,800-bed Big Spring Facility and the company-owned 1,732-bed Flight Line Facility, which on a combined basis were previously referred to as the Big Spring Correctional Center in ~~connection with~~Texas. The two ten-year contracts were awarded to GEO under a long-standing procurement commonly referred to as Criminal Alien Requirement (CAR) 16, which was issued by the ~~terms~~BOP in 2015. The contracts are expected to generate total combined revenues of approximately $664 million over their full ten-year terms. Additionally, only one of the ~~notice of redemption delivered to~~two contracts held by Reeves County, Texas was extended by the note holders on April 20, 2016 pursuant to the terms of the indenture governing the 6.625% Senior Notes. We financed the purchase of the 6.625% Senior Notes under the tender offer with part of the net cash proceeds from the 6.00% Senior Notes (see discussion above). As a result of the tender offer and redemption, we incurred a $15.9 million loss on extinguishment of debt related to the tender premium and deferred costs associated with the 6.625% Senior Notes. Refer to Note 9 - Debt of the Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part I, Item 1 of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-QBOP for ~~further discussion.~~one year.

WeAs of June 30, 2017, we are ~~currently~~ marketing approximately ~~3,300~~6,600 vacant beds at ~~four~~six of our idle facilities to potential customers. The carrying values of these idle facilities totaled approximately ~~$34.6~~$164.2 million as of June 30, ~~2016,~~2017, excluding equipment and other assets that can be easily transferred for use at other facilities.

On March 6, 2017, we acquired the 688-bed Maverick County Detention Center in Texas for approximately $15 million. The center, which is currently idle, was originally built by Maverick County and previously provided services for the U.S. Marshals Service.

The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements are prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. As such, we are required to make certain estimates, judgments and assumptions that we believe are reasonable based upon the information available. These estimates and assumptions affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities as of the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period. We routinely evaluate our estimates based on historical experience and on various other assumptions that management believes are reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions. During the six months ended June 30, ~~2016,~~2017, we did not experience any significant changes in estimates or judgments inherent in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements. A summary of our significant accounting policies is contained in Note 1 to our consolidated financial statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, ~~2015.~~2016.

The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with our unaudited consolidated financial statements and the notes to our unaudited consolidated financial statements included in Part I, Item 1, of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.


	2016		% of Revenue			2015		% of Revenue			$ Change			% Change			2017		% of Revenue			2016		% of Revenue			$ Change			% Change
	(Dollars in thousands)																(Dollars in thousands)
U.S. Corrections & Detention	$	341,573		62.3	%	$	304,329		68.3	%	$	37,244			12.2	%	$	360,838		62.5	%	$	341,573		62.3	%	$	19,265			5.6	%
GEO Care		96,529		17.6	%		82,658		18.5	%		13,871			16.8	%		139,364		24.2	%		96,529		17.6	%		42,835			44.4	%
International Services		38,497		7.0	%		38,543		8.6	%		(46	)		(0.1	)%		42,928		7.4	%		38,497		7.0	%		4,431			11.5	%
Facility Construction & Design		71,751		13.1	%		20,415		4.6	%		51,336			251.5	%		33,940		5.9	%		71,751		13.1	%		(37,811	)		(52.7	)%

Total	$	548,350		100.0	%	$	445,945		100.0	%	$	102,405			23.0	%	$	577,070		100.0	%	$	548,350		100.0	%	$	28,720			5.2	%

Revenues increased in Second Quarter ~~2016~~2017 compared to Second Quarter ~~2015~~2016 primarily due to aggregate increases of ~~$25.2~~$24.4 million ~~resulting from: (i)~~as a result of our acquisition of CEC on April 5, 2017 as well as the activation and intake of detainees related to our new contract at our company-owned ~~Great Plains~~Folkston ICE Processing Center correctional facility in ~~June 2015; (ii)~~January 2017. Refer to Note 2- Business Combinations of the ~~activation and intake~~Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part I, Item 1 of ~~inmates at~~this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for further discussion on our ~~company-owned North Lake correctional facility in May 2015; (iii) the activation and intake of inmates at our company-owned Mesa Verde facility; (iv) the~~ acquisition of ~~the LCS Facilities in February 2015; and (v) our assumption~~CEC. These increases were partially offset by net decreases of ~~the management of the 3,400-bed Arizona State Prison facility in Kingman, Arizona in December 2015. We also experienced aggregate increases in revenues of $20.3~~$5.1 million at certain of our facilities ~~primarily~~ due to aggregate net ~~increases~~decreases in population, transportation services and/or rates. ~~These increases were partially offset by a decrease of $8.3 million primarily due to contract terminations.~~

The number of compensated mandays in U.S. Corrections & Detention facilities was approximately 5.7 million in Second Quarter 2017 and 5.5 million in Second Quarter ~~2016 and 5.1 million in Second Quarter 2015.~~2016. We experienced an aggregate net increase of approximately ~~379,000~~207,000 mandays as a result of our ~~new contracts~~acquisition of CEC and ~~business acquisition~~contract activation discussed above. ~~These increases were partially offset by decreases resulting from lower populations at certain facilities.~~ We look at the average occupancy in our facilities to determine how we are managing our available beds. The average occupancy is calculated by taking compensated mandays as a percentage of capacity. The average occupancy in our U.S. Corrections & Detention facilities was ~~93.3%~~92.2% and ~~93.2%~~93.3% of capacity in the Second Quarter ~~2016~~2017 and Second Quarter ~~2015,~~2016, respectively, excluding idle facilities.

Revenues increased ~~by $13.9 million for GEO Care~~ in Second Quarter ~~2016~~2017 compared to Second Quarter ~~2015~~2016 primarily due to aggregate increases of $36.6 million from our acquisition of CEC on April 5, 2017. We also experienced increases of $7.1 million primarily due to increases in average client and participant counts under our Intensive Supervision Appearance Program (“ISAP”) and electronic monitoring ~~contracts and ISAP~~ services. ~~We also experienced~~These increases ~~from new contracts and program growth~~were partially offset by $0.9 million related to net decreases in census levels at certain of our community based and reentry ~~centers, including our new contract for community-based case management services under a new pilot program in September 2015 by the Department of Homeland Security.~~centers.

Revenues for International Services in Second Quarter ~~2016~~2017 compared to Second Quarter ~~2015 in total remained fairly consistent.~~2016 increased by $4.4 million We experienced a ~~decrease~~net increase of ~~$6.8~~$3.8 million primarily attributable to net population increases at our ~~South African subsidiary related~~Australian subsidiary. Additionally, we had an increase due to ~~temporary labor related matters. These decreases were partially offset by~~ foreign exchange rate fluctuations of ~~$6.8~~$0.6 million resulting from the weakening of the U.S. dollar against certain international currencies.

Revenues for our Facility Construction & Design services relate to the commencement of design and construction activity for our new Ravenhall Prison Contract executed in September 2014 with the Department of Justice in the State of Victoria, Australia. The ~~increase~~decrease is due to ~~increased~~decreased construction activity during ~~2015 and into 2016.~~2017 as the project gets closer to completion. These construction revenues have little to no margin.


	2016		% of Segment Revenues			2015		% of Segment Revenues			$ Change		% Change			2017		% of Segment Revenues			2016		% of Segment Revenues			$ Change			% Change
	(Dollars in thousands)															(Dollars in thousands)
U.S. Corrections & Detention	$	248,019		72.6	%	$	223,719		73.5	%	$	24,300		10.9	%	$	268,972		74.5	%	$	248,019		72.6	%	$	20,953			8.4	%
GEO Care		60,381		62.6	%		55,426		67.1	%		4,955		8.9	%		93,498		67.1	%		60,381		62.6	%		33,117			54.8	%
International Services		36,904		95.9	%		34,720		90.1	%		2,184		6.3	%		40,343		94.0	%		36,904		95.9	%		3,439			9.3	%
Facility Construction & Design		71,533		99.7	%		20,065		98.3	%		51,468		256.5	%		35,632		105.0	%		71,533		99.7	%		(35,901	)		(50.2	)%

Total	$	416,837		76.0	%	$	333,930		74.9	%	$	82,907		24.8	%	$	438,445		76.0	%	$	416,837		76.0	%	$	21,608			5.2	%

Operating expenses consist of those expenses incurred in the operation and management of our correctional, detention and community based facilities.

The increase in operating expenses for U.S. Corrections & Detention reflects an increase of ~~$16.4~~$20.5 million ~~due to (i)~~resulting from our acquisition of CEC on April 5, 2017 as well as the activation and intake of detainees related to our new contract at our company-owned ~~Great Plains~~Folkston ICE Processing Center correctional facility in June 2015; (ii) the activation and intake of inmates at our company-owned North Lake correctional facility in May 2015; (iii) the activation and intake of inmates at our company-owned Mesa Verde facility; (iv) the acquisition of the LCS Facilities in February 2015; and (v) our assumption of the management of the 3,400-bed Arizona State Prison facility in Kingman, Arizona in December 2015.January 2017. We also ~~experienced~~had aggregate net increases in operating expenses of ~~$11.6~~$0.4 million at certain of our facilities primarily ~~attributable~~due to ~~expenditures related to the expansion of the delivery of offender rehabilitation services under our GEO Continuum of Care platform,~~ net ~~population~~ increases ~~increased~~in population, transportation services and the variable costs associated with those increases. ~~These increases were partially offset by~~Operating expenses as a ~~decrease~~percentage of ~~$3.7 million~~revenues have increased during Second Quarter 2017 which is primarily related to ~~contract terminations.~~our acquisition of CEC. As we continue to integrate CEC into our operations, we expect to realize cost savings and other synergies in line with our other domestic correctional facilities.

Operating expenses for GEO Care increased by ~~$5.0~~$33.1 million during Second Quarter ~~2016~~2017 from Second Quarter ~~2015~~2016 primarily due to $28.6 million from our acquisition of CEC on April 5, 2017. We also experienced increases of $4.5 million primarily due to increases in average client and participant counts under our ISAP and electronic monitoring ~~contracts and ISAP services. We also experienced increases from new contracts~~services and program growth at our community based and reentry ~~centers, including~~centers. Operating expenses as a percentage of revenues have increased during Second Quarter 2017 which is primarily related to our ~~new contract for community-based case management services under a new pilot program~~acquisition of CEC. As we continue to integrate CEC into our operations, we expect to realize cost savings and other synergies in ~~September 2015 by the Department of Homeland Security.~~line with our other community based and reentry centers.

Operating expenses for International Services in Second Quarter ~~2016~~2017 compared to Second Quarter ~~2015~~2016 increased by ~~$2.2~~$3.4 million. ~~The~~We experienced a net increase ~~was~~of $2.6 million primarily attributable to net population increases at our Australian subsidiary. Additionally, we had an increase due to foreign exchange rate fluctuations of ~~$5.5~~$0.8 million resulting from the weakening of the U.S. dollar against certain international currencies. ~~This increase was partially offset by~~Operating expenses have decreased as a ~~decrease~~percentage of ~~$3.4 million~~revenue primarily ~~attributable~~due to certain nonrecurring labor related issues at our South African ~~subsidiary. Overall, our international segment experienced a slight decline~~subsidiary in ~~financial performance primarily driven by temporary labor related matters affecting our South African operation during~~ Second Quarter 2016.

Operating expenses for our Facility Construction & Design services relate to the commencement of design and construction activity for our new Ravenhall Prison Contract executed in September 2014 with the Department of Justice in the State of Victoria, Australia. The ~~increase~~decrease is due to ~~increased~~decreased construction activity during ~~2015~~2017 as the project gets closer to completion. We experienced an increase in operating expenses as a percentage of revenue due to a loss related to construction overruns recorded during Second Quarter 2017. Refer to Note 12- Business Segments and ~~into 2016.~~Geographic Information of the Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part I, Item 1 of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.


	2016		% of Segment Revenue			2015		% of Segment Revenue			$ Change			% Change			2017		% of Segment Revenue			2016		% of Segment Revenue			$ Change			% Change
	(Dollars in thousands)																(Dollars in thousands)
U.S. Corrections & Detention	$	18,565		5.4	%	$	17,994		5.9	%	$	571			3.2	%	$	19,475		5.4	%	$	18,565		5.4	%	$	910			4.9	%
GEO Care		9,568		9.9	%		8,014		9.7	%		1,554			19.4	%		11,923		8.6	%		9,568		9.9	%		2,355			24.6	%
International Services		519		1.3	%		552		1.4	%		(33	)		(6.0	)%		468		1.1	%		519		1.3	%		(51	)		(9.8	)%

Total	$	28,652		5.2	%	$	26,560		6.0	%	$	2,092			7.9	%	$	31,866		5.5	%	$	28,652		5.2	%	$	3,214			11.2	%

U.S. Corrections & Detention depreciation and amortization expense increased ~~slightly~~ in Second Quarter ~~2016~~2017 compared to Second Quarter ~~2015~~2016 primarily due to renovations made at several of our ~~facilities.~~facilities as well as our acquisition of CEC on April 5, 2017.

GEO Care depreciation and amortization expense increased in Second Quarter ~~2016~~2017 compared to Second Quarter ~~2015~~2016 primarily due to ~~renovations made at several~~new facilities and intangible assets acquired in our acquisition of ~~our locations.~~CEC on April 5, 2017.

Depreciation and amortization expense ~~decreased slightly~~remained relatively consistent in Second Quarter ~~2016~~2017 compared to Second Quarter ~~2015~~2016 as a result of certain assets becoming fully depreciated and there were no significant additions or renovations during ~~2015~~2016 or ~~2016~~2017 at our international subsidiaries.

General and administrative expenses comprise substantially all of our other unallocated operating expenses which primarily includes corporate management salaries and benefits, professional fees and other administrative expenses. The increase in general and administrative expenses in Second Quarter ~~2016~~2017 compared to Second Quarter ~~2015~~2016 was primarily attributable to (i) ~~expenditures~~merger and acquisition expenses of $10.3 million related to ~~the expansion~~our acquisition of ~~the delivery of offender rehabilitation services under our GEO Continuum of Care platform of $0.3 million;~~CEC; (ii) higher non-cash stock-based compensation expense of ~~$0.3 million;~~$1.8 million compared to the prior year and (iii) increases related to normal personnel and compensation adjustments, professional, consulting, business development and other administrative fees in the aggregate of ~~$2.6 million; and (iv) professional fees of $1.1~~$3.2 million.


	2016		% of Revenue			2015		% of Revenue			$ Change		% Change			2017		% of Revenue			2016		% of Revenue			$ Change		% Change
	(Dollars in thousands)															(Dollars in thousands)
Interest Income	$	5,902		1.1	%	$	2,868		0.6	%	$	3,034		105.8	%	$	12,346		2.1	%	$	5,902		1.1	%	$	6,444		109.2	%
Interest Expense	$	31,089		5.7	%	$	26,651		6.0	%	$	4,438		16.7	%	$	35,983		6.2	%	$	31,089		5.7	%	$	4,894		15.7	%

Interest income increased in the Second Quarter ~~2016~~2017 compared to Second Quarter ~~2015~~2016 primarily due to interest income earned on our contract receivable related to our prison project in Ravenhall, Australia. Refer to Note ~~11 -~~ 12—Business Segments and Geographic Information of the Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part I, Item 1 of this Quarterly Report onForm 10-Q.

Interest expense increased in Second Quarter ~~2016~~2017 compared to Second Quarter ~~2015~~2016 primarily due to additional interest incurred on higher debt balances resulting from our acquisition of CEC on April 5, 2017. Also contributing to the increase was the construction loan interest related to our prison project in Ravenhall, Australia. Refer to Note ~~9 -~~ 10—Debt of the Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part I, Item 1 of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

During Second Quarter 2016, we completed a tender offer and redemption of our 6.625% Senior Notes due 2021 which resulted in a loss of $15.9 million related to the tender premium and deferred costs associated with the 6.625% Senior ~~Notes. Refer to Note 9 - Debt of the~~ Notes ~~to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part I, Item 1 of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.~~due 2021.

The provision for income taxes during Second Quarter ~~2016 increased~~2017 decreased compared to Second Quarter ~~2015~~2016 along with the effective tax rate. The ~~increase~~decrease is primarily due to the tax benefit on the merger and acquisition expenses of $10.3 million related to our acquisition of CEC incurred in Second Quarter 2017 as well as the debt extinguishment costs incurred by the REIT in Second Quarter 2016 which ~~carry~~carried no tax ~~benefit.~~benefit but had the result of increasing the effective rate in that quarter. As a REIT, we are required to distribute at least 90% of our taxable income to shareholders and in turn are allowed a deduction for the distribution at the REIT level. Our wholly-owned taxable REIT subsidiaries continue to be fully subject to federal, state and foreign income taxes, as applicable. We estimate our annual effective tax rate to be in the range of approximately ~~10%~~7% to ~~12%~~9% exclusive of any ~~non-recurring~~discrete items.

Equity in earnings of affiliates, presented net of income taxes, represents the earnings of SACS and GEOAmey in the aggregate. Equity in earnings of affiliates during Second Quarter ~~2016~~2017 compared to Second Quarter ~~2015 increased primarily as a result of~~2016 decreased due to nonrecurring favorable ~~performance~~contract adjustments received in Second Quarter 2016 by ~~GEOAmey during the periods.~~GEOAmey.


	2017		% of Revenue			2016		% of Revenue			$ Change			% Change
	(Dollars in thousands)
U.S. Corrections & Detention	$	708,769		62.8	%	$	679,943		64.3	%	$	28,826			4.2	%
GEO Care		243,130		21.6	%		189,943		17.9	%		53,187			28.0	%
International Services		84,620		7.5	%		76,052		7.2	%		8,568			11.3	%
Facility Construction & Design		91,165		8.1	%		112,597		10.6	%		(21,432	)		(19.0	)%

Total	$	1,127,684		100.0	%	$	1,058,535		100.0	%	$	69,149			6.5	%

Revenues increased in First Half ~~2016~~2017 compared to First Half ~~2015~~2016 primarily due to aggregate increases of ~~$63.0~~$29.2 million ~~resulting from: (i)~~as a result of our acquisition of CEC on April 5, 2017 as well as the activation, ~~and~~ intake of detainees related to our new contract at our company-owned ~~Great Plains~~Folkston ICE Processing Center correctional facility in ~~June 2015; (ii) the activation and intake~~January 2017. These increases were partially offset by net decreases of inmates at our company-owned North Lake correctional facility in May 2015; (iii) the activation and intake of inmates at our company-owned Mesa Verde facility; (iv) the acquisition of the LCS Facilities in February 2015; and (v) our assumption of the management of the 3,400-bed Arizona State Prison facility in Kingman, Arizona in December 2015. We also experienced aggregate increases in revenues of $40.7$0.4 million at certain of our facilities ~~primarily~~ due to aggregate net ~~increases~~decreases in population, transportation services and/or rates. ~~These increases were partially offset by a decrease of $13.7 million primarily due to contract terminations.~~

The number of compensated mandays in U.S. Corrections & Detention facilities was approximately 11.2 million in First Half 2017 and 10.9 million in First Half ~~2016 and 9.9 million in First Half 2015.~~2016. We experienced an aggregate net increase of approximately ~~1,059,000~~278,000 mandays as a result of our ~~new contracts~~acquisition of CEC and ~~business acquisition~~contract activation discussed above. ~~These increases were partially offset by decreases resulting from lower populations at certain facilities.~~ We look at the average occupancy in our facilities to determine how we are managing our available beds. The average occupancy is calculated by taking compensated mandays as a percentage of capacity. The average occupancy in our U.S. Corrections & Detention facilities was ~~92.6%~~93.5% and ~~93.3%~~92.6% of capacity in ~~the~~First Half 2017 and First Half 2016, ~~and First Half 2015,~~ respectively, excluding idle facilities.

Revenues increased ~~for GEO Care~~ in First Half ~~2016~~2017 compared to First Half ~~2015~~2016 primarily due to aggregate increases of $36.6 million from our acquisition of CEC on April 5, 2017. We also experienced increases of $17.6 million primarily due to increases in average client and participant counts under our ISAP and electronic monitoring ~~contracts and ISAP~~ services. ~~We also experienced~~These increases ~~from new contracts and program growth~~were partially offset by $1.0 million related to net decreases in census levels at certain of our community based and reentry ~~centers, including our new contract for community-based case management services under a new pilot program in September 2015 by the Department of Homeland Security.~~centers.

Revenues for International Services in First Half ~~2016~~2017 compared to First Half ~~2015 decreased~~2016 increased by ~~$3.1 million. The decrease was primarily the result~~$8.6 million We experienced a net increase of ~~a decrease of $18.5~~$5.9 million primarily attributable to net population increases at our ~~South African subsidiary related~~Australian subsidiary. Additionally, we had an increase due to ~~temporary labor related matters. These decreases were partially offset by~~ foreign exchange rate fluctuations of ~~$15.3~~$2.7 million resulting from the weakening of the U.S. dollar against certain international currencies.


	2016		% of Segment Revenues			2015		% of Segment Revenues			$ Change			% Change			2017		% of Segment Revenues			2016		% of Segment Revenues			$ Change			% Change
	(Dollars in thousands)																(Dollars in thousands)
U.S. Corrections & Detention	$	500,358		73.6	%	$	429,228		72.8	%	$	71,130			16.6	%	$	524,009		73.9	%	$	500,358		73.6	%	$	23,651			4.7	%
GEO Care		120,478		63.4	%		108,436		66.9	%		12,042			11.1	%		157,985		65.0	%		120,478		63.4	%		37,507			31.1	%
International Services		72,184		94.9	%		72,962		92.1	%		(778	)		(1.1	)%		78,651		92.9	%		72,184		94.9	%		6,467			9.0	%
Facility Construction & Design		112,323		99.8	%		41,213		97.7	%		71,110			172.5	%		92,507		101.5	%		112,323		99.8	%		(19,816	)		(17.6	)%

Total	$	805,343		76.1	%	$	651,839		74.6	%	$	153,504			23.5	%	$	853,152		75.7	%	$	805,343		76.1	%	$	47,809			5.9	%

Operating expenses consist of those expenses incurred in the operation and management of our correctional, detention and community based facilities.

The increase in operating expenses for U.S. Corrections & Detention reflects an increase of ~~$50.1~~$23.9 million ~~due to (i)~~resulting from our acquisition of CEC on April 5, 2017 as well as the activation and intake of detainees related to our new contract at our company-owned ~~Great Plains~~Folkston ICE Processing Center correctional facility in ~~June 2015; (ii) the activation and~~

~~intake of inmates at our company-owned North Lake correctional facility~~January 2017. These increases were partially offset by aggregate decreases in May 2015; (iii) the activation and intake of inmates at our company-owned Mesa Verde facility; (iv) the acquisition of the LCS Facilities in February 2015; and (v) our assumption of the management of the 3,400-bed Arizona State Prison facility in Kingman, Arizona in December 2015. The timing of these activations and the corresponding start-up expenses resulted in an increase in our operating expenses ~~as a percentage~~ of ~~segment revenue in First Half 2016. We also experienced increases of $28.4~~$0.3 million at certain of our facilities primarily ~~attributable~~due to ~~expenditures related to the expansion of the delivery of offender rehabilitation services under our GEO Continuum of Care platform,~~ net decreases in population, ~~increases, increased~~ transportation services and the variable costs associated with those ~~increases. These increases were partially offset by a decrease of $7.4 million primarily related to contract terminations.~~decreases.

Operating expenses for GEO Care increased by ~~$12.0~~$37.5 million during First Half ~~2016~~2017 from First Half ~~2015~~2016 primarily due to $28.6 million from our acquisition of CEC on April 5, 2017. We also experienced increases of $8.9 million primarily due to increases in average client and participant counts under our ISAP and electronic monitoring ~~contracts and ISAP services. We also experienced increases from new contracts~~services and program growth at our community based and reentry ~~centers, including our new contract for community-based case management services under a new pilot program in September 2015 by the Department of Homeland Security.~~centers.

Operating expenses for International Services in First Half ~~2016~~2017 compared to First Half ~~2015 decreased~~2016 increased by ~~$0.8~~$6.5 million. ~~The decrease was primarily the result~~We experienced a net increase of ~~a decrease of $13.8~~$3.7 million primarily attributable to net population increases at our ~~South African~~Australian subsidiary. Overall, our international segment experienced a slight decline in financial performance primarily driven by temporary labor related matters affecting our South African operation during Second Quarter 2016. These decreases were partially offset byAdditionally, we had an increase due to foreign exchange rate fluctuations of ~~$13.0~~$2.8 million resulting from the weakening of the U.S. dollar against certain international currencies. Operating expenses have decreased as a percentage of revenue primarily due to certain nonrecurring labor related issues at our South African subsidiary in First Half 2016.

Operating expenses for our Facility Construction & Design services relate to the commencement of design and construction activity for our new Ravenhall Prison Contract executed in September 2014 with the Department of Justice in the State of Victoria, Australia. The ~~increase~~decrease is due to ~~increased~~decreased construction activity during ~~2015~~2017. We experienced an increase in operating expenses as a percentage of revenue due to a loss related to construction overruns recorded during First Half 2017. Refer to Note 12- Business Segments and ~~into 2016.~~Geographic Information of the Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part I, Item 1 of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.


	2016		% of Segment Revenue			2015		% of Segment Revenue			$ Change			% Change			2017		% of Segment Revenue			2016		% of Segment Revenue			$ Change			% Change
	(Dollars in thousands)																(Dollars in thousands)
U.S. Corrections & Detention	$	37,157		5.5	%	$	34,497		5.8	%	$	2,660	��		7.7	%	$	37,473		5.3	%	$	37,157		5.5	%	$	316			0.9	%
GEO Care		18,914		10.0	%		15,854		9.8	%		3,060			19.3	%		22,376		9.2	%		18,914		10.0	%		3,462			18.3	%
International Services		1,032		1.4	%		1,150		1.5	%		(118	)		(10.3	)%		966		1.1	%		1,032		1.4	%		(66	)		(6.4	)%

Total	$	57,103		5.4	%	$	51,501		5.9	%	$	5,602			10.9	%	$	60,815		5.4	%	$	57,103		5.4	%	$	3,712			6.5	%

U.S. Corrections & Detention depreciation and amortization expense increased slightly in First Half ~~2016~~2017 compared to First Half ~~2015~~2016 primarily due to renovations made at several of our ~~facilities.~~facilities as well as our acquisition of CEC on April 5, 2017.

GEO Care depreciation and amortization expense increased in First Half ~~2016~~2017 compared to First Half ~~2015~~2016 primarily due to ~~renovations made at several~~new facilities and intangible assets acquired in our acquisition of ~~our locations.~~CEC on April 5, 2017.

Depreciation and amortization expense decreased slightly in First Half ~~2016~~2017 compared to First Half ~~2015~~2016 as a result of certain assets becoming fully depreciated and there were no significant additions or renovations during ~~2015~~2016 or ~~2016~~2017 at our international subsidiaries.

General and administrative expenses comprise substantially all of our other unallocated operating expenses which primarily includes corporate management salaries and benefits, professional fees and other administrative expenses. The increase in general and administrative expenses in First Half ~~2016~~2017 compared to First Half ~~2015~~2016 was primarily attributable to (i) ~~expenditures~~merger and acquisition expenses of $13.0 million related to ~~the expansion~~our acquisition of ~~the delivery of offender rehabilitation services under our GEO Continuum of Care platform of $0.6 million;~~CEC; (ii) non-cash stock-based compensation expense of ~~$0.9 million;~~$3.5 million and (iii) increases related to normal personnel and compensation adjustments, ~~of $4.1 million; and (iv) and~~ professional, ~~fees of $2.2 million. These increases were partially offset by decreases in~~consulting, business development ~~costs~~ and ~~non-recurring legal~~other administrative fees ~~incurred~~ in ~~connection with our acquisition~~the aggregate of ~~Soberlink and the LCS Facilities in 2015.~~$7.3 million.


	2016		% of Revenue			2015		% of Revenue			$ Change		% Change			2017		% of Revenue			2016		% of Revenue			$ Change		% Change
	(Dollars in thousands)															(Dollars in thousands)
Interest Income	$	10,459		1.0	%	$	4,941		0.6	%	$	5,518		111.7	%	$	24,323		2.2	%	$	10,459		1.0	%	$	13,864		132.6	%
Interest Expense	$	60,455		5.7	%	$	51,297		5.9	%	$	9,158		17.9	%	$	70,983		6.3	%	$	60,455		5.7	%	$	10,528		17.4	%

Interest income increased in the First Half ~~2016~~2017 compared to First Half ~~2015~~2016 primarily due to interest income earned on our contract receivable related to our prison project in Ravenhall, Australia. Refer to Note ~~11 -~~ 12—Business Segments and Geographic Information of the Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part I, Item 1 of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

Interest expense increased in First Half ~~2016~~2017 compared to First Half ~~2015~~2016 primarily due to additional interest incurred on higher debt balances resulting from our acquisition of CEC on April 5, 2017. Also contributing to the increase was the construction loan interest related to our prison project in Ravenhall, ~~Australia as well as additional Revolver interest incurred in connection with our acquisition of the LCS Facilities.~~Australia. Refer to Note ~~9 - Debt of the Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part I, Item 1 of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.~~

During First Half 2016, we completed a tender offer and redemption of our 6.625% Senior Notes which resulted in a loss of $15.9 million related to the tender premium and deferred costs associated with the 6.625% Senior Notes. Refer to Note 9 - 10—Debt of the Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part I, Item 1 of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

During First Half 2016, we completed a tender offer and redemption of our 6.625% Senior Notes due 2021 which resulted in a loss of $15.9 million related to the tender premium and deferred costs associated with the 6.625% Senior Notes due 2021.

The provision for income taxes during First Half ~~2016 increased~~2017 decreased compared to First Half ~~2015~~2016 along with the effective tax rate. The ~~increase~~decrease is primarily due to the tax benefit on the merger and acquisition expenses of $10.3 million related to our acquisition of CEC incurred in First Half 2017 as well as the debt extinguishment costs incurred by the REIT in First Half 2016 which ~~carry~~carried no tax ~~benefit.~~benefit but had the result of increasing the effective rate in that half. Additionally, we had a $1.4 million discrete tax benefit related to the adoption of ASU No. 2016-09,Compensation—Stock Compensation (Topic 718).Refer to Note 14—Recent Accounting Pronouncements of the Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part I, Item 1 of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. As a REIT, we are required to distribute at least 90% of our taxable income to shareholders and in turn are allowed a deduction for the distribution at the REIT level. Our wholly-owned taxable REIT subsidiaries continue to be fully subject to federal, state and foreign income taxes, as applicable. We estimate our annual effective tax rate to be in the range of approximately ~~10%~~7% to ~~12%~~9% exclusive of any ~~non-recurring~~discrete items.

Equity in earnings of affiliates, presented net of income taxes, represents the earnings of SACS and GEOAmey in the aggregate. Equity in earnings of affiliates during First Half ~~2016~~2017 compared to First Half ~~2015 increased~~2016 decreased primarily ~~as a result of~~due to nonrecurring favorable ~~performance~~contract adjustments received in First Half 2016 by ~~GEOAmey during the periods.~~GEOAmey.

Our current cash requirements consist of amounts needed for working capital, distributions of our REIT taxable income in order to maintain our REIT qualification, debt service, supply purchases, investments in joint ventures, and capital expenditures related to either the development of new correctional, detention and reentry facilities, or the maintenance of existing facilities. In addition, some of our management contracts require us to make substantial initial expenditures of cash in connection with opening or renovating a facility. Generally, these initial expenditures are subsequently fully or partially recoverable as pass-through costs or are billable as a component of the per diem rates or monthly fixed fees to the contracting agency over the original term of the contract. In connection with GEOAmey, our joint venture in the United Kingdom, we and our joint venture partner have each provided a line of credit of £12 million, or ~~$16.1~~$15.6 million, based on exchange rates as of June 30, ~~2016,~~2017, for GEOAmey’s operations. As of June 30, ~~2016, $8.0~~2017, $3.3 million was ~~outstanding.~~outstanding to each of the joint ventures.

We currently have contractual commitments for a number of projects using Company financing. We estimate that the cost of these existing capital projects will be approximately ~~$109~~$196.3 million of which $6$46.8 million was spent through June 30, ~~2016.~~2017. We estimate that the remaining capital requirements related to these capital projects will be ~~$103~~$149.5 million which will be spent through 2017. Included in these commitments is a contractual commitment to provide a capital contribution towards the design and construction of a prison project in Ravenhall, a locality near Melbourne, Australia, which is estimated to be approximately $84 million as of June 30, 2016. This capital contribution is expected to be made in January 2017.2018. Additionally, in connection with the Ravenhall Prison Project, we have a contractual commitment for construction of the facility and have entered into a syndicated facility agreement with National Australia Bank Limited to provide funding for the project up to AUD 791.0 million, or ~~$589.0~~$608.0 million, based on exchange rates as of June 30, ~~2016.~~2017.

On ~~May 19, 2016 (the “Amendment Effective Date”),~~March 23, 2017, we executed ~~Amendment No. 1,~~a third amended and restated credit agreement by and among The GEO Group, Inc. and GEO Corrections Holdings, Inc. ~~(together~~, (“Corrections” and, together with GEO, the “Borrowers”), ~~GEO Australasia Holdings Pty Ltd (“GEO Australasia Holdings”), GEO Australasia Finance Holdings Pty Ltd as trustee for~~ the GEO Australasia Finance Holding Trust (the “Australian Trust”) (the “Australian Trustee”, and together with GEO Australasia Holdings, collectively, the “Australian Borrowers”), the guarantors party thereto, the issuing lenders party thereto, the lenders party thereto andAustralian Borrowers named therein, BNP Paribas, as ~~administrative agent (the “Amendment”), to the Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of August 27, 2014, by and among the Borrowers, BNP Paribas, as administrative agent,~~Administrative Agent, and the lenders who are, or may from time to time become, a party thereto (the ~~“Existing Credit~~“Credit Agreement”).

The ~~Amendment amends certain terms of the Existing~~ Credit Agreement refinances our prior $291.0 million term loan, reestablishes our ability to ~~effect~~implement at a ~~revolving~~later date an Australian Dollar Letter of Credit Facility (the “Australian LC Facility”) providing for the issuance of financial letters of credit and performance letters of credit, in each case denominated in Australian Dollars up to AUD275 million, an increase infrom the ~~amount of $200.0~~prior AUD225 million ~~increases to the total leverage thresholds used in the determination of the applicable interest rates,~~Australian LC Facility, and certain other modifications ~~(the Existing~~to the prior credit agreement. Loan costs of approximately $7.0 million were incurred and capitalized in connection with the transaction.

The Credit Agreement ~~as so modified, the “Amended Credit Agreement”~~evidences a credit facility (the “Credit Facility”).

~~The Amendment provides that each lender (including each Increasing Lender~~ consisting of an $800 million term loan (the “Term Loan”) bearing interest at LIBOR plus 2.25% (with a LIBOR floor of 0.75%), and ~~each Assuming Lender as defined in the Amended Credit Agreement) that executed~~ a ~~lender addendum as a~~$900 million revolving credit ~~lender agrees~~facility (the “Revolver”) initially bearing interest at LIBOR plus 2.25%% (with no LIBOR floor) together with AUD275 million under the Australian LC Facility. As of June 30, 2017, there were no letters of credit issued under the Australian LC Facility. Amounts to ~~provide a~~be borrowed by GEO under the Credit Agreement are subject to the satisfaction of customary conditions to borrowing. The Term Loan component is scheduled to mature on March 23, 2024. The revolving credit commitment ~~inclusive~~component is scheduled to mature on May 19, 2021; provided, that if on October 3, 2019 both the maturity dates of all term loans and incremental term loans have not been extended to a date that is 5¹⁄₂ years after March 23, 2017 or a later date, and the senior secured leverage ratio exceeds 2.50 to 1.00, then the termination date will be October 3, 2019. The Credit Agreement also has an accordion feature of $450.0 million, subject to lender demand and prevailing market conditions and satisfying the relevant borrowing conditions.

The Credit Agreement contains certain customary representations and warranties, and certain customary covenants that restrict our ability to, among other things (i) create, incur or assume any indebtedness, (ii) create, incur, assume or permit liens, (iii) make loans and investments, (iv) engage in mergers, acquisitions and asset sales, (v) make certain restricted payments, (vi) issue, sell or otherwise dispose of capital stock, (vii) engage in transactions with affiliates, (viii) allow the total leverage ratio to exceed 6.25 to 1.00, allow the senior secured leverage ratio to exceed 3.50 to 1.00, or allow the interest coverage ratio to be less than 3.00 to 1.00, (ix) cancel, forgive, make any voluntary or optional payment or prepayment on, or redeem or acquire for value any senior notes, except as permitted, (x) alter the business we conduct, and (xi) materially impair our lenders’ security interests in the collateral for its loans.

Events of default under the Credit Agreement include, but are not limited to, (i) our failure to pay principal or interest when due, (ii) our material breach of any representation or warranty, (iii) covenant defaults, (iv) liquidation, reorganization or other relief relating to bankruptcy or insolvency, (v) cross default under certain other material indebtedness, (vi) unsatisfied final judgments over a specified threshold, (vii) certain material environmental liability claims which have been asserted against us, and (viii) a change in control.

All of the obligations under the Credit Agreement are unconditionally guaranteed by certain domestic subsidiaries of GEO and the Credit Agreement and the related guarantees are secured by a perfected first-priority pledge of substantially all of our present and future tangible and intangible domestic assets and all present and future tangible and intangible domestic assets of each guarantor, including but not limited to a first-priority pledge of all of the outstanding capital stock owned by us and each guarantor in our domestic subsidiaries.

The Australian Borrowers are wholly owned foreign subsidiaries of GEO. We have designated each of the Australian Borrowers as restricted subsidiaries under the Credit Agreement. However, the Australian Borrowers are not obligated to pay or perform any obligations under the Credit Agreement other than their own obligations as Australian Borrowers under the Credit Agreement. The Australian Borrowers do not pledge any of their assets to secure any obligations under the Credit Agreement.

On August 18, 2016, the Company executed a Letter of Offer by and among GEO and HSBC Bank Australia Limited (the “Letter of Offer”) providing for a bank guarantee line and bank guarantee/standby sub-facility in an aggregate amount of AUD100 million, or $76.9 million, based on exchange rates in effect as of June 30, 2017 (collectively, the “Bank Guarantee Facility”). The Bank Guarantee Facility allows GEO to provide letters of credit to assure performance of certain obligations of its wholly owned subsidiary relating to its prison project in Ravenhall, located near Melbourne, Australia. The Bank Guarantee Facility is unsecured. The issuance of letters of credit ~~issued thereunder,~~under the Bank Guarantee Facility is subject to the ~~Borrowers at~~satisfaction of the ~~Amendment Effective Time in an aggregate principal amount equal to $900.0 million (the“Revolving Credit Commitment”) on the terms set forth~~conditions precedent specified in the ~~Amended Credit Agreement. In addition,~~Letter of Offer. Letters of credit issued under the ~~Amendment increases the principal amount of~~bank guarantee lines are due on demand and letters of credit ~~that may be~~ issued under the ~~Revolving Credit Commitment from $175.0~~bank guarantee/standby sub-facility cannot have a duration exceeding twelve months. The Bank Guarantee Facility may be terminated by HSBC on 90 days written notice. As of June 30, 2017, there was AUD100 million, ~~to $300.0 million.~~or 76.9 million based on exchange rates at June 30, 2017, in letters of credit issued under the Bank Guarantee Facility.

As of June 30, ~~2016,~~2017, we had ~~$291.0~~$798.0 million in aggregate borrowings outstanding, net of discount, under the Term Loan and ~~$450.0~~$194.0 million in borrowings under the Revolver, and approximately ~~$54.2~~$64.0 million in letters of credit which left ~~$395.8~~$642.0 million in additional borrowing capacity under the Revolver. Refer to Note ~~9 -~~10 – Debt of the Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part I, Item 1 of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for further discussion.

On April 18, 2016, we completed an offering of $350 million aggregate principal amount of 6.00% Senior ~~Notes.~~Notes due 2026. The ~~6.00% Senior Notes were offered~~notes will mature on April 15, 2026 and sold in a registered offering pursuant to an underwriting agreement, dated as of April 11, 2016 (the “Underwriting Agreement”) among GEO, certain of the Company’s domestic subsidiaries, as guarantors and Wells Fargo Securities, LLC, as representative for the underwriters named therein. The 6.00% Senior Notes were issued by us pursuant to the Indenture, dated as of September 25, 2014 (the “Base Indenture”), by and between GEO and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as trustee, as supplemented by a Second Supplemental Indenture, dated as of April 18, 2016 (the “Second Supplemental Indenture” and together with the Base Indenture, the “Indenture”), by and among GEO, the guarantors and the trustee which governs the terms of the 6.00% Senior Notes. The sale of the 6.00% Senior Notes was registered under our existing shelf registration statement on Form S-3 filed on September 12, 2014, as amended (File No. 333-198729). The 6.00% Senior Notes were issued athave a coupon rate and yield to maturity of 6.00%. Interest ~~on the 6.00% Senior Notes~~ is payable semi-annually cash in arrears on April 15 and October 15 of each ~~year, commencing on October 15, 2016.~~year. The ~~6.00% Senior Notes mature on April 15, 2026. We~~proceeds were used ~~part of the net proceeds~~ to fund the tender offer orand the ~~repurchase,~~ redemption ~~or other discharge~~ of ~~any and~~ all of our 6.625% Senior Notes ~~(see discussion below),~~due 2021, to pay all related fees, costs and expenses and for general corporate purposes including repaying borrowings under our Revolver. Loan costs of approximately $6 million were incurred and capitalized in connection with the offering. Refer to Note 9 - Debt of the Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part I, Item 1 of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for further discussion.

On April 11, 2016, we announced that we had commenced a cash tender offer for any and all of our $300.0 million aggregate principal amount of its 6.625% Senior Notes. On April 18, 2016, we completed the purchase of $231.0 million in aggregate principal amount of its 6.625% Senior Notes validly tendered in connection with our tender offer on or prior to the expiration time. On May 20, 2016, we completed the redemption of the remaining 6.625% Senior Notes in connection with the terms of the notice of redemption delivered to the note holders on April 20, 2016 pursuant to the terms of the indenture governing the 6.625% Senior Notes. We financed the purchase of the 6.625% Senior Notes under the tender offer with part of the net cash proceeds from the 6.00% Senior Notes (see discussion above). As a result of the tender offer and redemption, we incurred a $15.9 million loss on extinguishment related to the tender premium and deferred costs associated with the 6.625% Senior Notes. Refer to Note 9 - Debt of the Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part I, Item 1 of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for further discussion.

On September 25, 2014, we completed an offering of $250.0 million aggregate principal amount of ~~senior unsecured notes.~~5.875% Senior Notes due 2024. The notes will mature on October 15, 2024 and have a coupon rate and yield to maturity of 5.875%. Interest is payable semi-annually in cash in arrears on April 15 and October 15, which commenced on April 15, 2015. The 5.875% Senior Notes due 2024 are guaranteed on a senior unsecured basis by all our restricted subsidiaries that guarantee obligations. The 5.875% Senior Notes due 2024 rank equally in right of payment with any unsecured, unsubordinated indebtedness of the Company and the guarantors, including our 5.875% senior notes due 2022, the 5.125% senior notes due 2023, and the guarantors’ guarantees thereof, senior in right of payment to any future indebtedness of ours and the guarantors that is expressly subordinated toproceeds received from the 5.875% Senior Notes due 2024 ~~and the guarantees, effectively junior~~were used to ~~any secured indebtedness of ours and the guarantors, including indebtedness~~pay down outstanding borrowings under our ~~Credit Facility, to the extent of the value of the assets securing such indebtedness,~~Revolver and structurally junior to all obligations of our subsidiaries that are not guarantors. The sale of the 5.875% Senior Notes due 2024 was registered under our automatic shelf registration statement on Form S-3 filed on September 12, 2014.pay related fees, costs and expenses. Refer to Note ~~9 -~~10 – Debt of the Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part I, Item 1 of this Quarterly Report onForm 10-Q for further discussion.

In connection with a new design and build prison project agreement in Ravenhall, Australia with the State of Victoria, in September 2014, we entered into a syndicated facility agreement (the “Construction Facility”) with National Australia Bank Limited to provide debt financing for construction of the project. The Construction Facility provides for non-recourse funding up to AUD 791 million, or approximately ~~$589~~$608 million, based on exchange rates as of June 30, ~~2016.~~2017. Construction draws ~~will be~~are funded throughout the project according to a fixed utilization schedule as defined in the syndicated facility agreement. The term of the Construction Facility is through October 2019 and bears interest at a variable rate quoted by certain Australian banks plus 200 basis points. After October 2019, the Construction Facility will be converted to a term loan with payments due quarterly beginning in 2019 through 2041. In accordance with the terms of the Construction Facility, upon completion and commercial acceptance of the prison, in accordance with the prison contract, the State will make a lump sum payment of AUD 310 million, or approximately ~~$231~~$238 million, based on exchange rates as of June 30, ~~2016,~~2017, towards a portion of the outstanding principal. The remaining outstanding principal balance will be repaid over the term of the operating agreement. As of June 30, ~~2016,~~2017, approximately ~~$359~~$508 million was outstanding under the Construction Facility. We also entered into interest rate swap and interest rate cap agreements related to our non-recourse debt in connection with the project. Refer to Note ~~8 -~~9 – Derivative Financial Instruments of the Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part I, Item 1 of this Quarterly Report onForm 10-Q for further discussion.

On October 3, 2013, we completed an offering of $250.0 million aggregate principal amount of 5.875% Senior Notes due 2022. The 5.875% Senior Notes due 2022 will mature on January 15, 2022 and have a coupon rate and yield to maturity of 5.875%. Interest is payable semi-annually on January 15 and July 15 each year, which commenced on January 15, 2014. The proceeds received from the 5.875% Senior Notes due 2022 were used, together with cash on hand, to fund the repurchase, redemption or other discharge of our 7.75% senior notes due 2017 and to pay related transaction fees and expenses. ~~Refer to Note 9 - Debt of the Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part I, Item 1 of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for further discussion.~~

On March 19, 2013, we completed an offering of $300.0 million aggregate principal amount of 5.125% Senior Notes. The 5.125% Senior Notes will mature on April 1, 2023 and have a coupon rate and yield to maturity of 5.125%. Interest is payable semi-annually on April 1 and October 1 each year, which commenced on October 1, 2013. A portion of the proceeds received from the 5.125% Senior Notes were used ~~on the date of the financing~~ to repay the prior revolver credit draws outstanding under the prior senior credit facility. Refer to Note ~~9 -~~10 – Debt of the Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part I, Item 1 of this Quarterly Report onForm 10-Q for further discussion.

In addition to the debt outstanding under the Credit Facility, the 6.00% Senior Notes, the 5.125% Senior Notes, the 5.875^.% Senior Notes due 2022 and the 5.875% Senior Notes due 2024 discussed above, we also have significant debt obligations which, although these obligations are non-recourse to us, require cash expenditures for debt service. Our significant debt

obligations could have material consequences. See “Risk Factors-Risks Related to Our High Level of Indebtedness” in Item 1A of our Annual Report onForm 10-K for the year ended December 31, ~~2015.~~2016. We are exposed to various commitments and contingencies which may have a material adverse effect on our liquidity. We also have guaranteed certain obligations for certain of our international subsidiaries. These non-recourse obligations, commitments and contingencies and guarantees are further discussed in our Annual Report onForm 10-K for the year ended December 31, ~~2015.~~2016.

We consider opportunities for future business and/or asset acquisitions as we deem appropriate when market conditions present opportunities. If we are successful in our pursuit of any new projects, our cash on hand, cash flows from operations and borrowings under the existing Credit Facility may not provide sufficient liquidity to meet our capital needs and we could be forced to seek additional financing or refinance our existing indebtedness. There can be no assurance that any such financing or refinancing would be available to us on terms equal to or more favorable than our current financing terms, or at all. In the future, our access to capital and ability to compete for future capital intensive projects will also be dependent upon, among other things, our ability to meet certain financial covenants in the indenture governing the 5.125% Senior Notes, the indenture governing the 5.875% Senior Notes due 2022, the indenture governing the 5.875% Senior Notes due 2024, the indenture governing the 6.00% Senior Notes due 2026 and our Credit Agreement. A substantial decline in our financial performance could limit our access to capital pursuant to these covenants and have a material adverse affect on our liquidity and capital resources and, as a result, on our financial condition and results of operations. In addition to these foregoing potential constraints on our capital, a number of state government agencies have been suffering from budget deficits and liquidity issues. While we expect to be in compliance with our debt covenants, if these constraints were to intensify, our liquidity could be materially adversely impacted as could our ability to remain in compliance with these debt covenants.

On March 7, 2017, we entered into an underwriting agreement related to the issuance and sale of 9,000,000 shares of our common stock, par value $.01 per share. The offering price to the public was $27.80 per share and the underwriters agreed to purchase the shares from us pursuant to the underwriting agreement at a price of $26.70 per share. In addition, under the terms of the underwriting agreement, we granted the underwriters an option, exercisable for 30 days, to purchase up to an additional 1,350,000 shares of common stock. On March 8, 2017, the underwriters exercised in full their option to purchase the additional 1,350,000 shares of common stock. On March 13, 2017, we announced that we had completed the sale of 10,350,000 shares of common stock with its previously announced underwritten public offering. We received gross proceeds (before underwriting discounts and estimated offering expenses) of approximately $288.1 million from the offering, including approximately $37.6 million in connection with the sale of the additional shares. The 10,350,000 shares of common stock were issued under our currently effective shelf registration filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission as discussed below. The net proceeds of this offering were used to repay amounts outstanding under the revolver portion of our senior credit facility and for general corporate purposes.

In September 2014, we filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission an automatic shelf registration statement onForm S-3.On ~~May 8, 2013,~~November 10, 2014, in connection with the ~~Company~~shelf registration, we filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission a prospectus supplement related to the offer and sale from time to time of the Company’s common stock at an aggregate offering price of up to $100.0 million through sales agents. Sales of shares of the Company’s common stock under the prospectus supplement and equity distribution agreements entered into with the sales agents, if any, were to be made in negotiated transactions or transactions that were deemed to be “at the market” offerings as defined in Rule 415 under the Securities Act of 1933. On July 18, 2014, the Company filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission a post-effective amendment to its shelf registration statement on Form S-3 (pursuant to which the prospectus supplement had been filed) as a result of the merger of the Company into The GEO Group REIT, Inc. effective June 27, 2014. There were no shares of the Company’s common stock sold under the prospectus supplement during the year ended December 31, 2015 nor the six months ended June 30, 2016.

In September 2014, the Company filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission a new automatic shelf registration statement on Form S-3. On November 10, 2014, in connection with the new shelf registration, the Company filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission a new prospectus supplement related to the offer and sale from time to time of the Company’sour common stock at an aggregate offering price of up to $150.0 million through sales agents. Sales of shares of ~~the Company’s~~our common stock under the prospectus supplement and the equity distribution agreements entered into with the sales agents, if any, may be made in negotiated transactions or transactions that are deemed to be “at the market” offerings as defined in Rule 415 under the Securities Act of 1933. There were no shares of ~~the Company’s~~common stock ~~issued~~sold under this prospectus supplement during the six months ended June 30, 2017 or during the year ended December 31, ~~2015 nor~~2016. We sold 10,350,000 shares of common stock in a public offering during the six months ended June 30, ~~2016.~~2017 pursuant to this automatic shelf registration statement under the preliminary prospectus supplement filed on March 7, 2017 and the final prospectus supplement filed on March 9, 2017.

As a REIT, we are subject to a number of organizational and operational requirements, including a requirement that we annually distribute to our shareholders an amount equal to at least 90% of our REIT taxable income (determined before the deduction for dividends paid and by excluding any net capital gain). Generally, we expect to distribute all or substantially all of our REIT taxable income so as not to be subject to the income or excise tax on undistributed REIT taxable income. The amount, timing and frequency of distributions will be at the sole discretion of our Board of Directors and will be based upon various factors.

We plan to fund all of our capital needs, including distributions of our REIT taxable income in order to maintain our REIT qualification, and capital expenditures, from cash on hand, cash from operations, borrowings under our Credit Facility and any

other financings which our management and Board of Directors, in their discretion, may consummate. Currently, our primary source of liquidity to meet these requirements is cash flow from operations and borrowings under the ~~$700.0~~$900.0 million Revolver. Our management believes that cash on hand, cash flows from operations and availability under our Credit Facility will be adequate to support our capital requirements for ~~2016 through~~ 2017 as disclosed under “Capital Requirements” above.

We have a non-qualified deferred compensation agreement with our Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”). The current agreement, as amended, provides for a lump sum payment upon retirement, no sooner than age 55. As of January 1, 2013, our CEO had reached age 55 and was eligible to receive the payment upon retirement. If our CEO had retired as of June 30, ~~2016,~~2017, we would have had to pay him ~~$7.7~~approximately $8.0 million. Based on our current capitalization, we do not believe that making this payment would materially adversely impact our liquidity.

Except as discussed above, and in the notes to our Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part I, Item 1 of this quarterly report on Form 10-Q, we do not have any off-balance sheet arrangements.

Cash and cash equivalents as of June 30, ~~2016~~2017 was ~~$38.9~~$65.9 million, compared to ~~$59.6~~$68.0 million as of December 31, ~~2015.~~2016.

Cash provided by operating activities amounted to $50.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2017 versus cash provided by operating activities of $38.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2016. Cash provided by operating activities during the six months ended June 30, 2017 was positively impacted by net income attributable to GEO, non-cash expenses such as depreciation and amortization, amortization of debt issuance costs, and stock-based compensation expense. Equity in earnings of affiliates negatively impacted cash. Changes in accounts receivable, prepaid expenses and other assets decreased in total by $44.3 million, representing a positive impact on cash. The decrease was primarily driven by the timing of billings and collections. Changes in accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities decreased by $24.1 million which negatively impacted cash. The decrease was primarily driven by the timing of payments.

Additionally, cash provided by operating activities for the six months ended June 30, 2017 was negatively impacted by an increase in changes in contract receivable of $122.0 million. This increase relates to costs incurred and estimated earnings in excess of billings related to the prison project in Ravenhall, Australia. The contract receivable is expected to grow as construction services are performed and will continue to have a negative impact on cash from operating activities until the balance is ultimately settled. In accordance with the contract, the project will not be billed out until completion and commercial acceptance of the facility.

Cash provided by operating activities amounted to $38.3 million for the six months ended June 30, ~~2016 versus cash provided by operating activities of $79.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2015.~~2016. Cash provided by operating activities during the six months ended June 30, 2016 was positively impacted by net income attributable to GEO, non-cash expenses such as depreciation and amortization, ~~loss on extinguishment of debt,~~ amortization of debt issuance costs, and stock-based compensation expense. Equity in earnings of affiliates negatively impacted cash. Changes in accounts receivable, prepaid expenses and other assets decreased in total by $14.0 million, representing a positive impact on cash. The decrease was primarily driven by the timing of billings and collections. Changes in accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities increased by $9.6 million which positively impacted cash. The increase was primarily driven by the timing of payments.

Additionally, cash provided by operating activities for the six months ended June 30, 2016 was negatively impacted by an increase in changes in contract receivable of $124.3 million. This increase relates to costs incurred and estimated earnings in excess of billings related to the prison project in Ravenhall, Australia. The contract receivable is expected to grow as construction services are performed and will continue to have a negative impact on cash from operating activities until the balance is ultimately ~~settled with the State.~~settled. In accordance with the contract, the project will not be billed out until completion and commercial acceptance of the ~~facility by the State.~~facility.

Cash ~~provided by operating~~used in investing activities of $423.2 million during the six months ended June 30, 2015 was positively impacted by net income attributable to GEO, non-cash expenses such as depreciation and amortization, amortization of debt issuance costs, and stock-based compensation expense. Equity in earnings of affiliates negatively impacted cash. Changes in accounts receivable, prepaid expenses and other assets decreased in total by $14.0 million, representing a positive impact on cash. The decrease2017 was primarily ~~driven by~~ the ~~timing~~result of ~~billings~~capital expenditures of $67.5 million and ~~collections. Changes in accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities decreased by $1.2 million which negatively impacted cash. The decrease was primarily driven by the timing~~our acquisition of ~~payments.~~

~~Additionally,~~CEC, net of cash ~~provided by operating activities for the six months ended June 30, 2015 was negatively impacted by an increase in changes in contract receivable~~acquired, of ~~$46.6~~$354.5 million. ~~This increase relates to costs incurred and estimated earnings in excess of billings related to the prison project in Ravenhall, Australia. The contract receivable is expected to grow as~~

construction services are performed and will continue to have a negative impact on cash from operating activities until the balance is ultimately settled with the State. In accordance with the contract, the project will not be billed out until completion and commercial acceptance of the facility by the State.

Cash used in investing activities of $111.3 million during the six months ended June 30, 2016 was primarily the result of capital expenditures of $46.0 million and changes in restricted cash ofand investmentsof $65.9 million. Cash used in investing activities of $407.9 million during the six months ended June 30, 2015 was primarily the result of our business acquisitions of the LCS Facilities and Soberlink in the amount of $307.4 million and $24.4 million, respectively, and capital expenditures of $71.7 million.

Cash provided by financing activities during the six months ended June 30, ~~2016~~2017 amounted to ~~$52.0~~$369.0 million compared to cash provided by financing activities of ~~$334.9~~$52.0 million during the six months ended June 30, ~~2015.~~2016. Cash provided by financing activities during the six months ended June 30, 2017 was primarily the result of proceeds from long-term debt of $1,158.6 million which included proceeds received from the Company’s Term Loan which was modified on March 23, 2017. Additionally, we had proceeds from non-recourse debt of $91.1 million related to construction draws for our prison project in Ravenhall, Australia. These increases were partially offset by a decrease for dividends paid of $110.9 million, payments on long-term debt of $972.5 million and payments on non-recourse debt of $67.9 million. Cash provided by financing activities during the six months ended June 30, 2016 amounted to $52.0 million. Cash provided by financing activities during the six months ended June 30, 2016 was primarily the result of proceeds from long-term debt of $641.0 million which included the issuance of our 6.00% Senior Notes. Additionally, we had proceeds from non-recourse debt of $159.1 million related to construction draws for our prison project in Ravenhall, Australia. These increases were partially offset by a decrease for dividends paid of $97.2 million and payments on long-term debt of $627.5 million which included the redemption of our 6.625% Senior Notes. Cash provided by financing activities during the six months ended June 30, 2015 was primarily the result of proceeds from long-term debt of $518.0 million under our Revolver which was primarily used to fund the acquisition of the LCS Facilities. Additionally, we had proceeds from non-recourse debt of $49.7 million related to construction draws for our prison project in Ravenhall, Australia. These increases were partially offset by a decrease for dividends paid of $92.3 million and payments on long-term debt of $134.7 million.Notes due 2021.

Funds from Operations (“FFO”) is a widely accepted supplemental non-GAAP measure utilized to evaluate the operating performance of real estate investment trusts. It is defined in accordance with the standards established by the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts, or NAREIT, which defines FFO as net income (loss) attributable to common shareholders (computed in accordance with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles), excluding real estate related depreciation and amortization, excluding gains and losses from the cumulative effects of accounting changes, extraordinary items and sales of properties, and including adjustments for unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures.

We also present Normalized Funds From Operations, or Normalized FFO, and Adjusted Funds from Operations, or AFFO, supplemental non-GAAP financial measures of real estate investment trusts’ operating performances.

Normalized FFO is defined as FFO adjusted for certain items which by their nature are not comparable from period to period or that tend to obscure the Company’s actual operating performance, including for the periods presented loss on extinguishment of debt, start-up expenses, ~~net of tax,~~ mergers and acquisitions (“M&A”) related expenses ~~net~~and the tax effect of ~~tax and loss on extinguishment of debt, net of tax.~~those adjustments.

AFFO is defined as Normalized FFO adjusted by adding non-cash expenses such as non-real estate related depreciation and amortization, stock based compensation expense, the amortization of debt issuance costs, discount and/or premium and other non-cash interest, and by subtracting recurring consolidated maintenance capital expenditures.

Because of the unique design, structure and use of our correctional facilities, we believe that assessing the performance of our correctional facilities without the impact of depreciation or amortization is useful and meaningful to investors. Although NAREIT has published its definition of FFO, companies often modify this definition as they seek to provide financial measures that meaningfully reflect their distinctive operations. We have modified FFO to derive Normalized FFO and AFFO that meaningfully reflect our operations. Our assessment of our operations is focused on long-term sustainability. The adjustments

we make to derive the non-GAAP measures of Normalized FFO and AFFO exclude items which may cause short-term fluctuations in income from continuing operations but have no impact on our cash flows, or we do not consider them to be fundamental attributes or the primary drivers of our business plan and they do not affect our overall long-term operating performance.

We may make adjustments to FFO from time to time for certain other income and expenses that do not reflect a necessary component of our operational performance on the basis discussed above, even though such items may require cash settlement. Because FFO, Normalized FFO and AFFO exclude depreciation and amortization unique to real estate as well as non-operational items and certain other charges that are highly variable from year to year, they provide our investors with performance measures that reflect the impact to operations from trends in occupancy rates, per diem rates, operating costs and interest costs, providing a perspective not immediately apparent from income from continuing operations. We believe the presentation of FFO, Normalized FFO and AFFO provide useful information to investors as they provide an indication of our ability to fund capital expenditures and expand our business. FFO, Normalized FFO and AFFO provide disclosure on the same basis as that used by our management and provide consistency in our financial reporting, facilitate internal and external comparisons of our historical operating performance and our business units and provide continuity to investors for comparability purposes. Additionally, FFO, Normalized FFO and AFFO are widely recognized measures in our industry as a real estate investment trust.

Our reconciliation of net income attributable to The GEO Group, Inc. to FFO, Normalized FFO and AFFO for the three and six months ended June 30, ~~2016~~2017 and ~~2015~~2016 is as follows (in thousands):


	Three Months Ended						Six Months Ended						Three Months Ended						Six Months Ended
	June 30, 2016			June 30, 2015			June 30, 2016			June 30, 2015			June 30, 2017			June 30, 2016			June 30, 2017			June 30, 2016
Funds From Operations
Net income attributable to The GEO Group, Inc.	$	23,209		$	28,291		$	55,559		$	57,068		$	30,992		$	23,209		$	71,395		$	55,559
Real estate related depreciation and amortization		15,221			14,492			30,363			28,377			16,550			15,221			31,936			30,363
Gain on sale of real estate assets *														—			—			(261	)		—

NAREIT Defined FFO		38,430			42,783			85,922			85,445			47,542			38,430			103,070			85,922
Loss on extinguishment of debt, net of tax		15,866			—			15,866
Start-up expenses, net of tax		—			2,912			1,190			2,912
M&A related expenses, net of tax		—			673			—			2,232
Loss on extinguishment of debt														—			15,866			—			15,866
Start-up expenses														—			—			—			1,939
M&A related expenses														10,336			—			12,956			—
Tax effect of adjustments to Funds From Operations **														(2,487	)		—			(2,523	)		(749	)

Normalized Funds from Operations	$	54,296		$	46,368		$	102,978		$	90,589		$	55,391		$	54,296		$	113,503		$	102,978

Non-real estate related depreciation and amortization		13,431			12,068			26,740			23,124			15,316			13,431			28,879			26,740
Consolidated maintenance capital expenditures		(5,954	)		(5,425	)		(11,194	)		(12,086	)		(4,934	)		(5,954	)		(11,367	)		(11,194	)
Stock-based compensation expense		3,248			2,956			6,489			5,578			5,030			3,248			9,993			6,489
Amortization of debt issuance costs, discount and/or premium and other non-cash interest		2,661			1,521			5,027			3,216			3,870			2,661			7,676			5,027

Adjusted Funds from Operations	$	67,682		$	57,488		$	130,040		$	110,421		$	74,673		$	67,682		$	148,684		$	130,040

The following discussion contains statements that are not historical statements and, therefore, constitute forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Our forward-looking statements are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those stated or implied in the forward-looking statements. Please refer to “Part I -– Item 1A. Risk Factors” and the “Forward Looking Statements -– Safe Harbor” sections in our Annual Report onForm 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, ~~2015,~~2016, as well as the “Forward-Looking Statements -– Safe Harbor” section and other disclosures contained in thisForm 10-Q for further discussion on forward-looking statements and the risks and other factors that could prevent us from achieving our goals and cause the assumptions underlying the forward-looking statements and the actual results to differ materially from those expressed in or implied by those forward-looking statements.

Domestically, we continue to pursue a number of opportunities for corrections and detention facilities. Continued need for corrections facilities in various states and the need for bed space at the federal level are two of the factors that have contributed to these opportunities.

During the first quarter of 2016, we completed the activation of the 3,400-bed Arizona State Prison in Kingman, Arizona under an assignment, from the previous operator, of the existing managed-only contract with the State of Arizona.

We continue to be encouraged by the current landscape of growth opportunities; however any positive trends may, to some extent, be adversely impacted by government budgetary constraints or any changes to the government’s willingness to maintain or grow public-private partnerships in the future. While state finances overall are stable, future budgetary pressures may cause state correctional agencies to pursue a number of cost savings initiatives which may include reductions in per diem rates and/or the scope of services provided by private operators. These potential cost savings initiatives could have a material adverse impact on our current operations and/or our ability to pursue new business opportunities. Additionally, if state budgetary constraints, as discussed above, persist or intensify, our state customers’ ability to pay us may be impaired and/or we may be forced to renegotiate our management contracts on less favorable terms and our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows could be materially adversely impacted. We plan to actively bid on any new projects that fit our target profile for profitability and operational risk. Although we are pleased with the overall industry outlook, positive trends in the industry may be offset by several factors, including budgetary constraints, ~~unanticipated~~contract modifications, contract terminations, contract non-renewals, and/or contract ~~re-bids.~~ re-bids and the impact of any other potential changes to the willingness to maintain or grow public-private partnerships on the part of other government agencies. We believe we have a strong relationship with our government partners and we believe that we operate facilities that maximize security and efficiency while offering our suite of GEO Continuum of Care services and resources. During the second quarter of 2017, we experienced lower utilization rates across U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (“ICE”) facilities compared to the same period last year. During the first half of 2017, Southwest border crossings and apprehensions have declined compared to the first half of 2016 according to data from U.S. Customs and Border Protection. Policy changes implemented at the federal level have resulted in increased border enforcement and are expected to result in increased enforcement in the interior of the country over time. During the third and fourth quarters of 2017, we expect utilization rates across ICE facilities to begin to increase sequentially from the second quarter 2017 but to be below previously projected levels.

Although we have historically had a relatively high contract renewal rate, there can be no assurance that we will be able to renew our expiring management contracts on favorable terms, or at all. Also, while we are pleased with our track record in re-bid situations, we cannot assure that we will prevail in any such future situations.

Internationally, we are exploring a number of opportunities in our current markets and will continue to actively bid on any opportunities that fit our target profile for profitability and operational risk. In September 2014, we announced that a consortium led by us and comprised of The GEO Group Australia Pty. Ltd., John Holland Construction and Honeywell signed a contract with the Department of Justice in the State of Victoria for the development and operation of a 1,300-bed capacity prison in Ravenhall, Australia. The Ravenhall facility will be developed under a public-private partnership financing structure with a capital contribution from us, which was made in January 2017, of approximately AUD 115 million, or ~~$85.6~~$88.4 million, based on exchange rates as of June 30, ~~2016,~~2017, and we anticipate returns on investment consistent with our company-owned facilities.

With respect to our reentry services, electronic monitoring services, and youth services business conducted through our GEO Care business segment, we are currently pursuing a number of business development opportunities. Relative to opportunities for community-based reentry services, we are working with our existing federal, state, and local correctional clients to leverage new opportunities for both residential reentry facilities as well as non-residential day reporting centers. We continue to expend resources on informing federal, state and local governments about the benefits of public-private partnerships, and we anticipate that there will be new opportunities in the future as those efforts ~~begin~~continue to yield results. We believe we are well positioned to capitalize on any suitable opportunities that become available in this area.

Operating expenses consist of those expenses incurred in the operation and management of our contracts to provide services to our governmental clients. Labor and related ~~cost~~costs represented ~~50.0%~~52.9% of our operating expenses during the six months ended June 30, ~~2016.~~2017. Additional significant operating expenses include food, utilities and inmate medical costs. During the six months ended June 30, ~~2016,~~2017, operating expenses totaled ~~76.1%~~75.7% of our consolidated revenues. Our operating expenses as a percentage of revenues in ~~2016~~2017 will be impacted by the opening of any new or existing idle facilities as a result of the cost of transitioning and/or start-up operations related to a facility opening. During ~~2016,~~2017, we will incur carrying costs for facilities that are currently vacant. As of June 30, ~~2016,~~2017, our worldwide operations include the management and/or ownership of approximately ~~87,000~~100,000 beds at ~~104~~143 correctional and detention facilities, including idle facilities, projects under development and recently awarded contracts, and also include the provision of community supervision services for more than ~~127,000~~185,000 offenders and ~~pre-trial~~pretrial defendants, including approximately ~~83,000~~100,000 individuals through an array of technology products including radio frequency, GPS, and alcohol monitoring devices.

General and administrative expenses consist primarily of corporate management salaries and benefits, professional fees and other administrative expenses. During the six months ended June 30, ~~2016,~~2017, general and administrative expenses totaled ~~6.7%~~8.4% of our consolidated revenues. We expect general and administrative expenses as a percentage of revenues in ~~2016~~2017 to remain consistent or decrease as a result of cost savings initiatives. We expect business development costs to remain consistent or increase slightly as we pursue additional business development opportunities in all of our business lines. We also plan to continue expending resources from time to time on the evaluation of potential acquisition targets.

WeAs of June 30, 2017, we are ~~currently~~ marketing approximately ~~3,300~~6,600 vacant beds at ~~four~~six of our idle facilities to potential customers. The annual carrying cost of our idle facilities in ~~2016~~2017 is estimated to be ~~$12.7~~$11.7 million, including depreciation expense of $1.5 million. As of June 30, ~~2016,~~2017, these facilities had a net book value of ~~$34.6~~$164.2 million. We currently do not have any firm commitment or agreement in place to activate these facilities. Historically, some facilities have been idle for multiple years before they received a new contract award. These idle facilities are included in the U.S. Corrections & Detention segment. The per diem rates that we charge our clients often vary by contract across our portfolio. However, if all of these idle facilities were to be activated using our U.S. Corrections & Detention average per diem rate in ~~2015~~2017 (calculated as the U.S. Corrections & Detention revenue divided by the number of U.S. Corrections & Detention mandays) and based on the average occupancy rate in our U.S. Corrections & Detention facilities through June 30, ~~2016,~~2017, we would expect to receive incremental annualized revenue of approximately ~~$70~~$140 million and an annualized increase in earnings per share of approximately $0.20 to $0.25 per share based on our average U.S. Corrections and Detention operating margin.

We are exposed to market risks related to changes in interest rates with respect to our Credit Facility. Payments under the Credit Facility are indexed to a variable interest rate. Based on borrowings outstanding under the Credit Facility of ~~$740.6~~$992.2 million and ~~$54.2~~$64.0 million in outstanding letters of credit, as of June 30, ~~2016,~~2017, for every one percent increase in the average interest rate applicable to the Credit Facility, our total annual interest expense would increase by ~~$7.4~~$10.0 million.

We have ~~entered into certain interest rate swap arrangements for hedging purposes, fixing the interest rate on our Australian non-recourse debt related to the Fulham facility to 9.7%. We have also~~ entered into certain interest rate swap arrangements for hedging purposes, fixing the interest rates on our Australian non-recourse debt related to our Ravenhall Project to 3.3% during the design and construction phase and 4.2% during the operating phase. The difference between the floating rate and the swap rate on these instruments is recognized in interest expense within the respective entity. Because the interest rates with respect to these instruments are fixed, a hypothetical one percent change in the current interest rate would not have a material impact on our financial condition or results of operations.

Additionally, we invest our cash in a variety of short-term financial instruments to provide a return. These instruments generally consist of highly liquid investments with original maturities at the date of purchase of three months or less. While these instruments are subject to interest rate risk, a hypothetical 100 basis point increase or decrease in market interest rates would not have a material impact on our financial condition or results of operations.

We are also exposed to market risks related to fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates between the U.S. dollar, and the Australian dollar, the ~~Canadian dollar, the~~ South African Rand and the British Pound currency exchange rates. Based upon our foreign currency exchange rate exposure at June 30, ~~2016,~~2017, every 10 percent change in historical currency rates would have approximately a ~~$1.3~~$2.7 million effect on our financial position and approximately a ~~$0.6~~$0.9 million impact on our results of operations during the ~~three~~six months ended June 30, ~~2016.~~2017.

Our management, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, referred to as the Exchange Act), as of the end of the period covered by this report. On the basis of this review, our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer, has concluded that as of the end of the period covered by this report, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective to give reasonable assurance that the information required to be disclosed in our reports filed with the SEC, under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the rules and forms of the SEC, and to ensure that the information required to be disclosed in the reports filed or submitted under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer, in a manner that allows timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

It should be noted that the effectiveness of our system of disclosure controls and procedures is subject to certain limitations inherent in any system of disclosure controls and procedures, including the exercise of judgment in designing, implementing and evaluating the controls and procedures, the assumptions used in identifying the likelihood of future events, and the inability to eliminate misconduct completely. Accordingly, there can be no assurance that our disclosure controls and procedures will detect all errors or fraud. As a result, by its nature, our system of disclosure controls and procedures can provide only reasonable assurance regarding management’s control objectives.

Our management is responsible to report any changes in our internal control over financial reporting (as such term is defined inRules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) during the period to which this report relates that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting. Management believes that there have not been any changes in our internal control over financial reporting (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) during the period to which this report relates that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

The information required herein is incorporated by reference from Note ~~10 -~~11 – Commitments, Contingencies and Other in the Notes to the Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part I, Item 1 of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

Item 1A of Part I of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, ~~2015~~2016 includes a detailed discussion of the risk factors that could materially affect our business, financial condition or future prospects.

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.


Florida		65-0043078
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		(IRS Employer Identification No.)

One Park Place, 621 NW 53rd Street, Suite 700, Boca Raton, Florida		33487
(Address of principal executive offices)		(Zip Code)


Large accelerated filer	x☑	Accelerated filer		¨
			☐
Non-accelerated filer	¨ ~~(Do~~☐(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)	Smaller reporting company		¨☐
		Emerging growth company		☐


PART I -– FINANCIAL INFORMATION			3

ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS			3

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (UNAUDITED) FOR THE THREE AND SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, ~~2016~~2017 AND ~~2015~~2016			3

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS) (UNAUDITED) FOR THE THREE AND SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, ~~2016~~2017 AND ~~2015~~2016			4

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AS OF JUNE 30, ~~2016~~2017 (UNAUDITED) AND DECEMBER 31, ~~2015~~2016			5

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (UNAUDITED) FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, ~~2016~~2017 AND ~~2015~~2016			6

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS			7

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS			3841

ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK			6064

ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES			6064

PART II -– OTHER INFORMATION			6165

ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS			6165

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS			6165

ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS			6165

ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES			6165

ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES			6165

ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION			6165

ITEM 6. EXHIBITS			6266

SIGNATURES			6367


Accounts Receivable	$	29,936
Prepaid and other current assets		5,032
Property and equipment		126,510
Intangible assets		76,000
Favorable lease assets		3,110
Deferred income tax assets		2,223
Other non-current assets		4,327

Total assets acquired	$	247,138

Accounts payable and accrued expenses		53,800
Unfavorable lease liabilities		1,299
Other non-current liabilities		9,917

Total liabilities assumed	$	65,016

Total identifiable net assets		182,122
Goodwill		172,343

Total consideration paid, net of cash acquired	$	354,465


	Three Months Ended				Six Months Ended
	June 30, 2017		June 30, 2016		June 30, 2017		June 30, 2016
Pro forma revenues	$	579,681	$	610,512	$	1,189,890	$	1,183,502
Pro forma net income attributable to the GEO Group, Inc.	$	38,960	$	23,999	$	80,800	$	55,850


	Weighted Average Useful Life (years)		Fair Value as of April 5, 2017
Facility management contracts		18.3	$	75,300
Covenants not to compete		1		700

Total acquired intangible assets			$	76,000


			Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2016
	Carrying Value at December 31, 2016		Quoted Prices in Active Markets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
Assets:
Restricted investments:
Rabbi Trust	$	15,662	$	—	$	15,662	$	—
Fixed income securities		1,782		—		1,782		—
Interest rate cap derivatives		15		—		15		—
Liabilities:
Interest rate swap derivatives	$	18,679	$	—	$	18,679	$	—


			Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2015
	Carrying Value at December 31, 2015		Quoted Prices in Active Markets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
Assets:
Restricted investments:
Rabbi Trust	$	13,071	$	—	$	13,071	$	—
Fixed income securities		1,717		—		1,717		—
Interest rate cap derivatives		93		—		93		—
Liabilities:
Interest rate swap derivatives	$	20,835	$	—	$	20,835	$	—


			Estimated Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2016
	Carrying Value as of December 31, 2016		Total Fair Value		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
Assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	68,038	$	68,038	$	68,038	$	—	$	—
Restricted cash and investments		22,319		22,319		19,614		2,705		—
Liabilities:
Borrowings under senior credit facility	$	804,500	$	795,008	$	—	$	795,008	$	—
5.875% Senior Notes due 2024		250,000		247,813		—		247,813		—
5.125% Senior Notes		300,000		292,125		—		292,125		—
5.875% Senior Notes due 2022		250,000		254,688		—		254,688		—
6.00% Senior Notes		350,000		346,938		—		346,938		—
Non-recourse debt, Australian subsidiary		454,222		454,185		—		454,185		—
Other non-recourse debt, including current portion		36,280		37,550		—		37,550		—


Declaration Date	Record Date	Payment Due	Distribution Per Share		Aggregate Payment Amount (in millions)
February 6, 2015	February 17, 2015	February 27, 2015	$	0.62	$	46.0
April 29, 2015	May 11, 2015	May 21, 2015	$	0.62	$	46.3
July 31, 2015	August 14, 2015	August 24, 2015	$	0.62	$	46.3
November 3, 2015	November 16, 2015	November 25, 2015	$	0.65	$	48.5
February 3, 2016	February 16, 2016	February 26, 2016	$	0.65	$	48.5
April 20, 2016	May 2, 2016	May 12, 2016	$	0.65	$	48.7


Declaration Date	Record Date	Payment Date	Distribution Per Share		Aggregate Payment Amount (in millions)
February 3, 2016	February 16, 2016	February 26, 2016	$	0.43	$	48.5
April 20, 2016	May 2, 2016	May 12, 2016	$	0.43	$	48.7
July 20, 2016	August 1, 2016	August 12, 2016	$	0.43	$	48.7
October 18, 2016	October 31, 2016	November 10, 2016	$	0.43	$	48.8
February 6, 2017	February 17, 2017	February 27, 2017	$	0.47	$	52.5
April 25, 2017	May 9, 2017	May 19, 2017	$	0.47	$	58.4


	Six Months Ended June 30, 2016
	(In thousands)
	Foreign currency translation adjustments, net of tax attributable to The GEO Group, Inc. (1)			Unrealized (loss)/gain on derivatives, net of tax			Pension adjustments, net of tax			Total
Balance, December 31, 2015	$	(11,747	)	$	(17,697	)	$	(2,960	)	$	(32,404	)
Current-period other comprehensive (loss) income		1,092			(4,642	)		65			(3,485	)

Balance, June 30, 2016	$	(10,655	)	$	(22,339	)	$	(2,895	)	$	(35,889	)


	Shares			Wtd. Avg. Exercise Price		Wtd. Avg. Remaining Contractual Term (years)		Aggregate Intrinsic Value
	(in thousands)							(in thousands)
Options outstanding at December 31, 2015		749		$	29.98		6.85	$	3,057
Options granted		295			29.39
Options exercised		(93	)		21.20
Options forfeited/canceled/expired		(46	)		35.14

Options outstanding at June 30, 2016		905		$	30.42		7.45	$	5,323

Options vested and expected to vest at June 30, 2016		848		$	30.23		7.34	$	5,136

Options exercisable at June 30, 2016		472		$	27.45		6.09	$	3,955


	Six Months Ended June 30, 2016			Year Ended December 31, 2015
Change in Projected Benefit Obligation
Projected benefit obligation, beginning of period	$	25,935		$	25,826
Service cost		497			1,173
Interest cost		578			1,082
Actuarial gain		—			(1,818	)
Benefits paid		(168	)		(328	)

Projected benefit obligation, end of period	$	26,842		$	25,935

Change in Plan Assets
Plan assets at fair value, beginning of period	$	—		$	—
Company contributions		168			328
Benefits paid		(168	)		(328	)
Plan assets at fair value, end of period	$	—		$	—

Unfunded Status of the Plan	$	(26,842	)	$	(25,935	)


		Six Months Ended June 30, 2017			Year Ended December 31, 2016
Change in Projected Benefit Obligation
Projected benefit obligation, beginning of period		$	28,624		$	25,935
Service cost			501			995
Interest cost			617			1,155
Actuarial loss			—			1,031
Benefits paid			(301	)		(492	)

Projected benefit obligation, end of period		$	29,441		$	28,624

Change in Plan Assets
Plan assets at fair value, beginning of period	��	$	—		$	—
Company contributions			301			492
Benefits paid			(301	)		(492	)

Plan assets at fair value, end of period		$	—		$	—

Unfunded Status of the Plan		$	(29,441	)	$	(28,624	)


	For the Three Months Ended June 30, 2017
	The GEO Group, Inc.			Combined Subsidiary Guarantors			Combined Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries			Eliminations			Consolidated
Revenues	$	171,260		$	465,286		$	79,436		$	(138,912	)	$	577,070
Operating expenses		135,244			373,399			68,714			(138,912	)		438,445
Depreciation and amortization		6,065			24,906			895			—			31,866
General and administrative expenses		15,573			29,432			7,201			—			52,206

Operating income		14,378			37,549			2,626			—			54,553
Interest income		6,751			409			12,476			(7,290	)		12,346
Interest expense		(17,451	)		(15,775	)		(10,047	)		7,290			(35,983	)

Income before income taxes and equity in earnings of affiliates		3,678			22,183			5,055			—			30,916
Income tax provision		147			793			460			—			1,400
Equity in earnings of affiliates, net of income tax provision		—			—			1,426			—			1,426

Income before equity in income of consolidated subsidiaries		3,531			21,390			6,021			—			30,942
Income from consolidated subsidiaries, net of income tax provision		27,411			—			—			(27,411	)		—

Net income		30,942			21,390			6,021			(27,411	)		30,942
Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interests		—			—			50			—			50

Net income attributable to The GEO Group, Inc.	$	30,942		$	21,390		$	6,071		$	(27,411	)	$	30,992

Net income	$	30,942		$	21,390		$	6,021		$	(27,411	)	$	30,942
Other comprehensive income, net of tax		—			64			1,808			—			1,872

Total comprehensive income	$	30,942		$	21,454		$	7,829		$	(27,411	)	$	32,814
Comprehensive loss attributable to noncontrolling interests		—			—			51			—			51

Comprehensive income attributable to The GEO Group, Inc.	$	30,942		$	21,454		$	7,880		$	(27,411	)	$	32,865


	For the Three Months Ended June 30, 2015
	The GEO Group, Inc.			Combined Subsidiary Guarantors			Combined Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries			Eliminations			Consolidated
Revenues	$	161,365		$	367,482		$	61,521		$	(144,423	)	$	445,945
Operating expenses		141,323			286,414			50,616			(144,423	)		333,930
Depreciation and amortization		6,381			19,182			997			—			26,560
General and administrative expenses		11,049			16,928			4,197			—			32,174

Operating income		2,612			44,958			5,711			—			53,281
Interest income		5,735			847			3,183			(6,897	)		2,868
Interest expense		(15,537	)		(14,743	)		(3,268	)		6,897			(26,651	)

Income before income taxes and equity in earnings of affiliates		(7,190	)		31,062			5,626			—			29,498
Income tax provision		(61	)		1,588			842			—			2,369
Equity in earnings of affiliates, net of income tax provision		—			—			1,124			—			1,124

Income before equity in income of consolidated subsidiaries		(7,129	)		29,474			5,908			—			28,253
Income from consolidated subsidiaries, net of income tax provision		35,382			—			—			(35,382	)		—

Net income		28,253			29,474			5,908			(35,382	)		28,253
Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interests		—			—			38			—			38

Net income attributable to The GEO Group, Inc.	$	28,253		$	29,474		$	5,946		$	(35,382	)	$	28,291

Net income	$	28,253		$	29,474		$	5,908		$	(35,382	)	$	28,253
Other comprehensive income, net of tax		—			40			4,810			—			4,850

Total comprehensive income	$	28,253		$	29,514		$	10,718		$	(35,382	)	$	33,103
Comprehensive loss attributable to noncontrolling interests		—			—			43			—			43

Comprehensive income attributable to The GEO Group, Inc.	$	28,253		$	29,514		$	10,761		$	(35,382	)	$	33,146


	2016		Effective Rate			2015		Effective Rate			$ Change		% Change
	(Dollars in thousands)
Income Taxes	$	3,879		15.5	%	$	2,369		8.0	%	$	1,510		63.7	%


Period	Total Number of Shares Purchased (1)		Average Price Paid per Share		Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs		Approximate Dollar Value of Shares that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs
April 1, 2016 - April 30, 2016		—	$	—		—	$	—
May 1, 2016 - May 31, 2016		394	$	32.02		—	$	—
June 1, 2016 - June 30, 2016		15,375	$	33.29		—	$	—

Total		15,769				—	$	—


Period	Total Number of Shares Purchased (1)		Average Price Paid per Share		Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs		Approximate Dollar Value of Shares that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs
April 1, 2017 – April 30, 2017		—	$	—		—	$	—
May 1, 2017 – May 31, 2017		—	$	—		—	$	—
June 1, 2017 – June 30, 2017		21,377	$	30.55		—	$	—

Total		21,377				—	$	—



~~4.1~~3.1		~~Second Supplemental Indenture, dated as~~Articles of ~~April 18, 2016, by~~Amendment to the Amended and ~~among~~Restated Articles of Incorporation of The GEO Group, Inc.~~, the subsidiary guarantors named therein and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Trustee (incorporated~~ (Incorporated by reference from Exhibit ~~4.1~~3.1 to the Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April ~~18, 2016)~~26, 2017).

~~4.2~~3.2		~~Form~~Second Amended and Restated Bylaws of ~~6.00% Senior Notes due 2026 (incorporated~~The GEO Group, Inc. (Incorporated by reference from Exhibit ~~4.2~~3.1 to the Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April ~~18, 2016).~~

~~10.1~~		~~The GEO Group, Inc. Senior Management Performance Award Plan, as Amended and Restated (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.1 to the Form 8-K filed on May 2, 2016).~~

~~10.2~~		Amendment No. 1 to Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of May 19, 2016, among The GEO Group, Inc., GEO Corrections Holdings, Inc., GEO Australasia Holdings Pty Ltd, GEO Australasia Finance Holdings Pty Ltd as trustee for the GEO Australasia Finance Holding Trust, the Guarantors party thereto, the Issuing Lenders party thereto, the Lenders party thereto and BNP Paribas, as Administrative Agent (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.1 to the Form 8-K filed May 25, 2016)17, 2017).

31.1		SECTION 302 CEO Certification.

31.2		SECTION 302 CFO Certification.

32.1		SECTION 906 CEO Certification.

32.2		SECTION 906 CFO Certification.

101.INS		XBRL Instance Document

101.SCH		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema

101.CAL		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase

101.DEF		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase

101.LAB		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase

101.PRE		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase


						THE GEO GROUP, INC.

Date: August ~~4, 2016~~7, 2017						~~/s/ Brian R. Evans~~
						/s/ Brian R. Evans
						Brian R. Evans
						Senior Vice President & Chief Financial Officer
						~~(duly~~(duly authorized officer and principal financial officer)