Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x☒ No ¨☐

Indicate by checkmark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of RegulationS-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter time period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x☒ No ¨☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, anon-accelerated filer, ~~or a~~ smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See ~~definition~~definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated ~~filer” and~~filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule12b-2 of the Exchange Act. ~~(Check one):~~

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☒

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨☐ No x☒

Number of shares of common stock, par value $0.0001 per share, of the registrant issued and outstanding as of November 2, ~~2016~~2017 was ~~37,616,243~~38,140,801 shares.


	September 30, 2016 (Unaudited)			December 31, 2015			September 30, 2017 (Unaudited)			December 31, 2016
Assets
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	121,953		$	96,185		$	182,662		$	187,371
Commissions receivable		4,501			3,342			4,215			4,809
Prepaid expenses		6,987			7,542			5,828			8,094
Income tax receivable		—			4,049			—			1,182
Marketable securities, available-for-sale		48,377			79,860			82,813			27,454
Other assets, net		3,826			5,136			4,944			5,102

Total current assets		185,644			196,114			280,462			234,012
Prepaid rent		12,628			9,075			15,116			13,285
Property and equipment, net		15,585			11,579			17,130			16,355
Marketable securities, available-for-sale		94,279			54,395			45,444			77,475
Assets held in rabbi trust		7,309			5,661			8,545			7,337
Deferred tax assets, net		35,495			35,285			33,821			35,571
Other assets		9,056			9,116			23,034			9,981

Total assets	$	359,996		$	321,225		$	423,552		$	394,016


Liabilities and stockholders’ equity
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable and accrued expenses	$	9,865		$	9,135		$	8,571		$	10,133
Notes payable to former stockholders		986			939			1,035			986
Deferred compensation and commissions		29,644			34,091			29,477			44,754
Income tax payable		4,181			—			1,295			—
Accrued bonuses and other employee related expenses		20,152			30,846			20,297			22,303

Total current liabilities		64,828			75,011			60,675			78,176
Deferred compensation and commissions		40,278			43,678			43,591			44,455
Notes payable to former stockholders		8,686			9,671			7,651			8,686
Deferred rent and other liabilities		4,291			3,875			4,321			3,845

Total liabilities		118,083			132,235			116,238			135,162


Commitments and contingencies								—			—

Stockholders’ equity:
Preferred stock, $0.0001 par value:
Authorized shares – 25,000,000; issued and outstanding shares – none at September 30, 2016, and December 31, 2015, respectively		—			—
Authorized shares – 25,000,000; issued and outstanding shares – none at September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively								—			—
Common stock, $0.0001 par value:
Authorized shares – 150,000,000; issued and outstanding shares – 37,616,243 and 37,396,456 at September 30, 2016, and December 31, 2015, respectively		4			4
Authorized shares – 150,000,000; issued and outstanding shares – 38,140,801 and 37,882,266 at September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively								4			4
Additional paid-in capital		84,949			80,591			90,653			85,445
Stock notes receivable from employees		(4	)		(4	)		(4	)		(4	)
Retained earnings		155,425			107,942			215,591			172,599
Accumulated other comprehensive income		1,539			457			1,070			810

Total stockholders’ equity		241,913			188,990			307,314			258,854

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	359,996		$	321,225		$	423,552		$	394,016


	Three Months Ended September 30,						Nine Months Ended September 30,						Three Months Ended September 30,						Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2016			2015			2016			2015			2017			2016			2017			2016
Revenues:
Real estate brokerage commissions	$	165,695		$	151,942		$	489,477		$	446,356		$	169,357		$	165,695		$	472,069		$	489,477
Financing fees		11,320			10,865			30,779			30,046			11,368			11,320			34,131			30,779
Other revenues		3,619			3,069			8,037			9,497			2,616			3,619			10,724			8,037

Total revenues		180,634			165,876			528,293			485,899			183,341			180,634			516,924			528,293

Operating expenses:
Cost of services		113,852			102,010			323,131			293,725			114,803			113,852			314,827			323,131
Selling, general, and administrative expense		40,728			35,646			123,403			109,064
Selling, general and administrative expense														42,480			40,728			129,393			123,403
Depreciation and amortization expense		1,149			802			3,164			2,389			1,375			1,149			3,975			3,164

Total operating expenses		155,729			138,458			449,698			405,178			158,658			155,729			448,195			449,698

Operating income		24,905			27,418			78,595			80,721			24,683			24,905			68,729			78,595
Other income (expense), net		719			(464	)		1,567			23			1,172			719			3,005			1,567
Interest expense		(380	)		(380	)		(1,155	)		(1,349	)		(370	)		(380	)		(1,126	)		(1,155	)

Income before provision for income taxes		25,244			26,574			79,007			79,395			25,485			25,244			70,608			79,007
Provision for income taxes		10,100			11,398			31,524			32,994			10,010			10,100			27,564			31,524

Net income		15,144			15,176			47,483			46,401			15,475			15,144			43,044			47,483
Other comprehensive (loss) income:
Unrealized (loss) gain on marketable securities, net of tax of $(37), $47, $684 and $(159) for the three months ended September 30, 2016, and 2015 and the nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively		(56	)		56			1,050			(249	)
Foreign currency translation (loss) gain, net of tax of $0, $140, $0 and $226 for the three months ended September 30, 2016, and 2015 and the nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively		(3	)		234			32			361
Other comprehensive income:
Unrealized gains (losses) on marketable securities, net of tax of $66, $(37), $242 and $684 for the three months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 and the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively														104			(56	)		325			1,050
Foreign currency translation (loss) gain, net of tax of $0 for each of the three months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 and each of the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016														(40	)		(3	)		(65	)		32

Total other comprehensive (loss) income		(59	)		290			1,082			112
Total other comprehensive income														64			(59	)		260			1,082

Comprehensive income	$	15,085		$	15,466		$	48,565		$	46,513		$	15,539		$	15,085		$	43,304		$	48,565

Earnings per share:
Basic	$	0.39		$	0.39		$	1.22		$	1.19		$	0.40		$	0.39		$	1.10		$	1.22
Diluted	$	0.39		$	0.39		$	1.22		$	1.19		$	0.39		$	0.39		$	1.10		$	1.22
Weighted average common shares outstanding:
Basic		38,939			38,890			38,916			38,868			39,033			38,939			38,995			38,916
Diluted		39,122			39,160			39,034			39,051			39,204			39,122			39,136			39,034


	Preferred Stock				Common Stock					Additional Paid-In Capital			Stock Notes Receivable From Employees				Retained Earnings							Total				Preferred Stock						Common Stock						Additional Paid-In Capital				Stock Notes Receivable From Employees				Retained Earnings							Total
	Shares		Amount		Shares			Amount		Additional Paid-In Capital							Retained Earnings			Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income				Total			Shares			Amount			Shares				Amount						Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income					Retained Earnings							Total
Balance as of December 31, 2015		—	$	—		37,396,456		$	4	$	80,591		Stock Notes Receivable From Employees	$	(4	)		$	107,942			$	457		$	188,990
Balance as of December 31, 2016																													—		$	—			37,882,266			$	4	Additional Paid-In Capital		$	85,445	Stock Notes Receivable From Employees			$	(4	)		$	172,599		$	810			$	258,854

Cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle, net of tax																													—			—			—				—		85				—				(52	)			—			33

Balance at January 1, 2017, as adjusted																													—			—			37,882,266				4		85,530				(4	)			172,547				810			258,887
Net and comprehensive income		—		—		—			—		—			—				47,483				1,082			48,565				—			—			—				—		—				—				43,044				260			43,304

Stock-based award activity
Stock-based compensation		—		—		—			—		4,933			—				—				—			4,933				—			—			—				—		6,173				—				—				—			6,173
Shares issued pursuant to employee stock purchase plan		—		—		17,940			—		402			—				—				—			402				—			—			18,155				—		392				—				—				—			392
Issuance of common stock for unvested restricted stock awards		—		—		14,742			—		—			—				—				—			—				—			—			17,538				—		—				—				—				—			—
Issuance of common stock for vesting of restricted stock units		—		—		228,398			—		—			—				—				—			—				—			—			277,251				—		—				—				—				—			—
Shares withheld related to net share settlement of stock-based awards		—		—		(41,293	)		—		(1,134	)		—				—				—			(1,134	)			—			—			(54,409	)			—		(1,442	)			—				—				—			(1,442	)
Windfall tax benefit from stock-based award activity		—		—		—			—		157			—				—				—			157

Balance as of September 30, 2016		—	$	—		37,616,243		$	4	$	84,949		$	(4	)		$	155,425			$	1,539		$	241,913
Balance as of September 30, 2017																													—		$	—			38,140,801			$	4	$	90,653			$	(4	)		$	215,591			$	1,070		$	307,314


	Nine Months Ended September 30,				Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2016		2015		2017			2016
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information
Interest paid during the period	$	613	$	853	$	1,896		$	613

Income taxes paid, net	$	24,032	$	26,370	$	23,546		$	24,032

Supplemental disclosures of noncash investing and financing activities
Reduction of accrued bonuses and other employee related expenses in settlement of employee notes receivable	$	199	$	208	$	243		$	199

Change in property and equipment included in accounts payable and accrued expenses	$	421	$	729	$	(203	)	$	421

Settlements of deferred compensation obligation with trust assets	$	—	$	28

Marcus & Millichap, Inc., (the “Company”, “Marcus & Millichap”, or “MMI”), a Delaware corporation, is a brokerage firm specializing in commercial real estate investment sales, financing, research and advisory services. As of September 30, ~~2016,~~2017, MMI operates 8179 offices in the United States and Canada through its wholly-owned subsidiary, Marcus & Millichap Real Estate Investment Services, Inc. (“MMREIS”), which includes the operations of Marcus & Millichap Capital Corporation (“MMCC”).

MMI was formed in June 2013 in preparation for Marcus & Millichap Company (“MMC”) tospin-off its majority owned subsidiary, MMREIS(“Spin-Off”). Prior to the initial public offering (“IPO”) of MMI, all of the preferred and common stockholders of MMREIS (including MMC and employees of MMREIS) contributed all of their outstanding shares to MMI, in exchange for new MMI common stock. As a result, MMREIS became a wholly-owned subsidiary of MMI. Thereafter, MMC distributed 80.0% of the shares of MMI common stock to MMC’s shareholders and exchanged the remaining portion of its shares of MMI common stock for cancellation of indebtedness of MMC. MMI completed its IPO on October 30, 2013.

The financial information presented in the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements, has been prepared in accordance with rules and regulations of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) for quarterly reports on Form10-Q andArticle 10-01 ofRegulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“U.S. GAAP”) for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements and notes include all adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring adjustments) necessary for a fair presentation of the condensed consolidated financial position, results of operations and cash flows for the periods presented. These unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the annual audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto for the year ended December 31, ~~2015~~2016 included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form10-K filed on March ~~15, 2016~~16, 2017 with the SEC. The results of the three and nine months ended September 30, ~~2016~~2017 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the fiscal year ending December 31, ~~2016,~~2017, or for other interim periods or future years.

The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiaries. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

The preparation of condensed consolidated financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the related disclosures at the date of the condensed consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Certain prior-period amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current period presentation. These changes had no impact on the previously reported condensed consolidated results of operations, financial condition, stockholders’ equity or on cash flows subtotals.

Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to a concentration of credit risk principally consist of cash and cash equivalents, due from independent contractors (included under other assets, net current and other assetsnon-current captions), investments in marketable securities,available-for-sale, security deposits (included under other assets,non-current caption) and commissions receivables. Cash isand cash equivalents are placed with high-credit quality financial institutions and invested in high-credit quality money market ~~funds.~~

To reduce its credit risk, the Company monitors the credit standing of the financial institutions that hold the Company’s cash and cash equivalents. The Company historically has not experienced any significant losses related to cash and cash equivalents.

The Company derives its revenues from a broad range of real estate investors, owners and users in the United States and Canada, none of which individually represents a significant concentration of credit risk. The Company ~~performs credit evaluations of its customers and debtors and~~ requires collateral on acase-by-case basis. The Company maintains allowances, as needed, for estimated credit losses based on management’s assessment of the likelihood of collection. For the three and nine months ended September 30, ~~2016~~2017 and ~~2015,~~2016, no transaction represented 10% or more of total revenues. Further, while one or more transactions may represent 10% or more of commissions receivable at any reporting date, amounts due are typically collected within 10 days of settlement and, therefore, do not expose the Company to significant credit risk.

~~The Company’s Canadian operations represented less than 1.0% of total revenues in each period presented.~~

For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, ~~one office~~the Company’s Canadian operations represented ~~approximately 10.9% and 10.1%~~less than 1% of ~~real estate brokerage commissions revenue, respectively. No~~total revenues.

For the three months ended September 30, 2017, one office represented 10% or more of ~~real estate brokerage commissions revenue during~~total revenues. For the three months ended September 30, 2016 and nine months ended September 30, ~~2015.~~2017 and 2016, no office represented 10% or more of total revenues.

The Company follows the guidance for segment reporting, which requires reporting information on operating segments in interim and annual financial statements. An operating segment is defined as a component of an enterprise that engages in business activities from which it may earn revenues and incur expenses whose separate financial information is available and is evaluated regularly by the Chief Operating Decision Maker (“CODM”) or decision making group, to perform resource allocations and performance assessments. The CODMs are the Chief Executive Officer, Chief Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer. The CODMs review aggregated financial information presented on anoffice-by-office basis for purposes of making operating decisions, assessing financial performance and allocating resources. Based on the evaluation of the Company’s financial information, management believes that the Company’s offices on a consolidated basis represent individual operating segments with similar economic characteristics that meet the criteria for aggregation into a single reportable segment for financial reporting purposes.

In ~~May 2014,~~March 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”)No. 2016-09,Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting (“ASU2016-09”). ASU2016-09 changes the accounting for share-based payment awards issued to employees. The Company adopted this new standard effective on January 1, 2017. The Company adopted the provisions of ASU2016-09 on a prospective basis except for the change in the accounting for forfeitures, where the Company adopted the provision on a modified retrospective basis with a cumulative-effect adjustment as of January 1, 2017. The adoption of the new standard did not have a material impact on the Company’s condensed consolidated financial position or results of operations.

As a result of the adoption, in periods subsequent to December 31, 2016, windfall tax benefits, net are recorded as a discrete item in the Company’s provision for income taxes. See Note 10 – “Income Taxes” for additional information. Prior to the adoption, any windfall tax benefits, net were recorded in additional paid in capital. Additionally, in periods subsequent to December 31, 2016, excess tax benefits for share-based payments were included in cash flows from operating activities rather than cash flows from financing activities. Further, the Company changed its accounting for forfeitures from estimating awards that are not expected to vest to recording forfeitures when they actually occur. The cumulative effect adjustment as of January 1, 2017 related to forfeitures was a charge to retained earnings of approximately $52,000 (net of tax) and is expected to have a minor impact on the timing of stock based compensation subsequent to January 1, 2017. See Note 9 – “Stock-Based Compensation Plans” for additional information.

In May 2017, the FASB issued ASU No.2017-09, Compensation - Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Scope of Modification Accounting(“ASU2017-09”), which provides guidance about which changes to the terms or conditions of a share-based payment award require an entity to apply modification accounting in Topic 718. ASU2017-09 clarifies when changes to the terms or conditions of a share-based payment award must be accounted for as modifications. The guidance clarifies that modification accounting will be applied if the value, vesting conditions or classification of the award changes. ASU2017-09 is effective for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017 and early adoption is permitted. The Company adopted ASU2017-09 during the nine months ended September 30, 2017. The adoption did not have any impact on the Company’s condensed consolidated financial position or results of operations.

In May 2014, the FASB issued ASUNo. 2014-09,Revenue from Contracts with Customers (“ASU2014-09”), which supersedes virtually all of the current revenue recognition guidance under U.S. GAAP, and requires entities to recognize revenue for transfer to customer of promised goods or services in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled to receive in exchange for those goods or services. Subsequent to the issuance of ASU2014-09, the FASB issued ASUNo. 2015-14,Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Deferral of the Effective Date, ASUNo. 2016-08,Revenue from Contacts with Customers: Principal Versus Agent Considerations, ASUNo. 2016-10,Revenue from Contracts with Customers: Identifying Performance Obligations and Licensing, and ASUNo. 2016-12,Revenue from Contracts with Customers: Narrow-Scope Improvements and Practical Expedients. The additional ASU’s clarified certain provisions of ASU2014-09 in response to recommendations from the Transition Resources Group established by the FASB and extended the required adoption of ASU2014-09 which is now effective for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017 and early adoption is permitted as of the original effective date.

ASU2014-09 permits two implementation approaches, one requiring retrospective application of the new standard with restatement of prior years and one requiring prospective application of the new standard with disclosure of results under old standards. For the Company, the new standard will be effective January 1, 2018. The Company does not have multiple-element arrangements, variable consideration, licenses ~~and~~or long-term contracts with customers. Accordingly, the ~~Company does~~adoption of ASU2014-09, as clarified, will not ~~expect this standard to~~ have a significant effect in the manner or timing of its revenue recognition. ~~The Company is in the process of completing the evaluation of the impact of this new standard and will select a transition method when the effect is determined.~~

~~In August 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-15,~~~~Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entity’s Ability to Continue as a Going Concern~~ (“ASU 2014-15”). Currently, there is no guidance under U.S. GAAP regarding management’s responsibility to assess whether there is substantial doubt about an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern. Under ASU 2014-15, the Company will be required to assess its ability to continue as a going concern each interim and annual reporting period and provide certain disclosures if there is substantial doubt about the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern, including management’s plan to alleviate the substantial doubt. ASU 2014-15 is effective for reporting periods ending after December 15, 2016 and early adoption is permitted. For the Company, the new standard will be effective December 31, 2016. The Company does not anticipate that the adoption will have an impact on the Company’s condensed consolidated financial position or results of operations.

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASUNo. 2016-02,Leases, to increase transparency and comparability by recognizing lease assets and lease liabilities on the balance sheet and disclosing key information about leasing arrangements. The Company is still evaluating the impact of the new standard. The Company will be required to adopt the new standard in 2019, and the Company’s condensed consolidated balance sheets will be impacted by the recording of a lease liability and right of use asset for virtually all of its current operating leases. As of September 30, 2017, the Company has remaining contractual obligations for operating leases (autos and office), which aggregate approximately $83.2 million. Accordingly, we anticipate that the adoption of the new standard will have a material impact on the Company’s condensed consolidated balance sheet. The amount of which and the potential impact on the condensed consolidated statements of net and comprehensive income and condensed consolidated statements of cash flows has yet to be determined. As of September 30, 2016, the Company has remaining contractual obligations for operating leases (autos and office), which aggregate approximately $77.1 million. Accordingly, we anticipate that the adoption of the new standard will have a material impact on the Company’s condensed consolidated balance sheet.

~~In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-09,~~~~Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting~~ ~~(“ASU 2016-09”). The ASU changes the accounting for share-based payment awards issued to employees in the following areas:~~

ASU 2016-09 is effective for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016 and early adoption is permitted. For the Company, the new standard will be effective on January 1, 2017. The Company is finalizing its evaluation of the impact of ASU 2016-09. The Company intends to adopt the provisions of ASU 2016-09 as of January 1, 2017. Since the Company issues stock-based awards to its employees and independent contractors and has recognized windfall tax benefits in additional paid in capital, it is anticipated that the ASU, when adopted, will impact (i) the Company’s provision for income taxes, and therefore net and comprehensive income and related earnings per share amounts, (ii) amounts presented in the condensed consolidated statement of stockholders’ equity and condensed consolidated statements of cash flows and (iii) to a lesser extent the timing of our stock-based compensation expense. In accordance with the provision of ASU 2016-09, the Company intends to change its accounting for forfeitures from awards that are not expected to vest to when forfeitures occur. The Company anticipates adopting the majority of the provision of ASU 2016-09 on a prospective basis except for the change in the accounting for forfeitures, where the Company anticipates adopting the provision on a modified retrospective basis with a cumulative-effect adjustment as of January 1, 2017. Since the impact of the adoption of ASU 2016-09 is dependent on the future share price of the Company’s stock, the Company cannot determine what the future impact will be for the forfeitures; however, based on the closing stock price on September 30, 2016, the cumulative-effect adjustment as of January 1, 2017 is not expected to be material. See Note 9 – “Stock-Based Compensation Plans” for additional information.

In June 2016, the FASB issued ASUNo. 2016-13,Financial Instruments - Credit Losses(“ASU2016-13”). ASU2016-13 is effective for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2019 and early adoption is permitted. For the Company, the new standard will be effective January 1, 2020. Under ASU2016-13, the Company will be required to use an expected-loss model for its marketable securities,available-for sale, which requires that credit losses be presented as an allowance rather than as aan impairment write-down. Reversals of credit losses (in situations in which the estimate of credit losses declines) is permitted in the reporting period the change occurs. Current U.S. GAAP prohibits reflecting reversals of credit losses in current period earnings. At September 30, 2017, the Company had $128.3 million in marketable securities, available for sale which would be subject to this new standard. As of September 30, 2017, these marketable securities, available for sale have an average credit rating of AA and no impairment write-downs have been recorded. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of this new ~~standard.~~

~~In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-15,~~~~Classification of Certain Cash Receipts~~standard on its investment policy and ~~Cash Payments~~(“ASU 2016-15”), to reduce diversity in practice in the classification of cash activity related to eight specific areas. ASU 2016-15 is effective for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017 and interim periods within those years and early adoption is permitted. The Company adopted ASU 2016-15 during the nine months ended September 30, 2016. The Company evaluated the impact of this new standard and determined its historical classifications, where applicable, were in accordance with ASU 2016-15. Accordingly, the adoption did not have an impact on the Company’s condensed consolidated financial position or results of operations.investments.

Property and equipment, net ~~consist~~consisted of the following (in thousands):


	September 30, 2016			December 31, 2015			September 30, 2017			December 31, 2016
Computer software and hardware equipment	$	13,502		$	10,973		$	15,449		$	14,583
Furniture, fixtures, and equipment		19,252			17,047			21,101			20,066
Less: accumulated depreciation and amortization		(17,169	)		(16,441	)		(19,420	)		(18,294	)

	$	15,585		$	11,579		$	17,130		$	16,355

During the nine months ended September 30, ~~2016~~2017 and ~~2015,~~2016, the Company wrote off approximately ~~$2.7~~$2.9 million and ~~$2.6~~$2.7 million, respectively, of fully depreciated computer software and hardware and furniture, fixtures and equipment.

The Company leases all of its facilities under operating lease agreements. Lease agreements may contain periods of free rent or reduced rent or contain predetermined fixed increases in the minimum rent. The Company recognizes the minimum lease payments as rent expense on a straight-line basis over the noncancellable term of the lease. The Company records the difference between the amount charged to rent expense and the rent paid as a deferred rent obligation. The Company typically leases general purpose built-out office space, which reverts to the lessor upon termination of the lease. Any payments for improvements, net of incentives received, are recorded as prepaid rent. Prepaid rent is amortized using the straight-line method over the expected lease term as a charge to rent expense.


	Current				Non-Current
	September 30,		December 31,		September 30,		December 31,		Current				Non-Current
	2016		2015		2016		2015		September 30, 2017		December 31, 2016		September 30, 2017		December 31, 2016
Due from independent contractors, net^{(1) (2)}	$	1,783	$	2,545	$	7,678	$	7,358	$	1,846	$	2,231	$	21,535	$	8,702
Security deposits		—		—		1,054		1,425		—		—		1,158		1,059
Employee notes receivable⁽³⁾		434		224		112		158		337		314		268		132
Customer trust accounts and other		1,609		2,367		212		175		2,761		2,557		73		88

	$	3,826	$	5,136	$	9,056	$	9,116	$	4,944	$	5,102	$	23,034	$	9,981

Deferred compensation and commissions consisted of the following (in thousands):


	Current				Non-Current				Current				Non-Current
	September 30,		December 31,		September 30,		December 31,		September 30, 2017		December 31, 2016		September 30, 2017		December 31, 2016
	2016		2015		2016		2015
SARs liability⁽¹⁾	$	1,366	$	—	$	20,719	$	21,399
Stock appreciation rights (“SARs”) liability⁽¹⁾									$	1,734	$	1,366	$	19,913	$	20,949
Commissions payable to investment sales and financing professionals		28,140		34,091		12,755		17,015		26,347		42,781		16,417		17,101
Deferred compensation liability⁽¹⁾		138		—		6,804		5,264		1,396		607		7,261		6,405

	$	29,644	$	34,091	$	40,278	$	43,678	$	29,477	$	44,754	$	43,591	$	44,455

Prior to the IPO, certain employees of the Company were granted ~~stock appreciation rights (“SARs”)~~SARs under a stock-based compensation program assumed by MMC. In connection with the IPO, the SARs agreements were revised, the MMC liability of $20.0 million for the SARs was frozen atas of March 31, 2013, and was transferred to MMI through a capital distribution. The SARs liability will be settled with each participant in ten annual installments in January of each year upon retirement or termination from service. Under the revised agreements, MMI is required to accrue interest on the outstanding balance beginning on January 1, 2014 at a rate based on the10-year treasury note plus 2%. The rate resets annually. The rates at January 1, 2017 and 2016 were 4.446% and ~~2015 were~~ 4.273% ~~and 4.173%~~, respectively. MMI recorded interest expense related to this liability of ~~$229,000~~$233,000 and ~~$214,000,~~$229,000 for the three months ended September 30, ~~2016~~2017 and ~~2015,~~2016, respectively and ~~$686,000~~$699,000 and ~~$642,000~~$686,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, ~~and 2015,~~ respectively.

Estimated payouts within the next twelve months for participants that have separated from service have been classified as current. During the nine months ended September 30, 2017, the Company made total payments (consisting of accumulated interest) of $1.4 million classified as an operating cash flow in the deferred compensation and commissions caption in the accompanying condensed consolidated statements of cash flows.

Certain investment sales professionals have the ability to earn additional commissions after meeting certain annual revenue thresholds. These commissions are recognized as cost of services in the period in which they are ~~earned.~~earned as they relate to specific transactions closed. The Company has the ability to defer payment of certain commissions, at its election, for up to three years. Commissions payable that are not expected to be paid within twelve months are classified as long-term.

A select group of management is eligible to participate in a Deferred Compensation Plan. The plan is a 409A plan and permits the participant to defer compensation up to limits as determined by the plan. Amounts are paid out generally when the participant is no longer a service provider; however, anin-service payout election is available to participants. Participants may elect to receive payouts as a lump sum or quarterly over a two to ~~fifteen year~~fifteen-year period. The Company elected to fund the Deferred Compensation Plan through company owned variable life insurance policies. The Deferred Compensation Plan is managed by a third-party institutional fund manager, and the deferred compensation and investment earnings are held as a Company asset in a rabbi trust, which is recorded in assets held in rabbi trust in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets. The assets in the trust are restricted unless the Company becomes insolvent, as defined in the Deferred Compensation Plan, in which case the trust assets are subject to the claims of MMI’s creditors. The Company may also, in its sole and absolute discretion, elect to withdraw at any time a portion of the trust assets by an amount by which the fair market value of the trust assets exceeds 110% of the aggregate deferred compensation liability represented by the participants’ accounts. Estimated payouts within the next twelve months for participants that have separated from service have been classified as current. During the nine months ended September 30, 2017, the Company made total payments to participants of $110,000.

The net change in the carrying value of the assets held in the rabbi trust and the net change in the carrying value of the deferred compensation liability, each exclusive of additional contributions, distributions and trust expenses consisted of the following (in thousands):

Amortized cost and fair value of marketable securities,available-for-sale, by type of security consisted of the following (in thousands):


	September 30, 2016									December 31, 2015									September 30, 2017									December 31, 2016
	Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized Gains		Gross Unrealized Losses			Fair Value		Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized Gains		Gross Unrealized Losses			Fair Value		Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized Gains		Gross Unrealized Losses			Fair Value		Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized Gains		Gross Unrealized Losses			Fair Value
Short-term investments:
U.S. treasuries	$	24,864	$	15	$	(1	)	$	24,878	$	62,343	$	—	$	(71	)	$	62,272	$	65,457	$	—	$	(92	)	$	65,365	$	24,987	$	—	$	(30	)	$	24,957
U.S. government sponsored entities		11,508		5		—			11,513		17,571		—		(12	)		17,559		7,034		—		(8	)		7,026		2,497		—		—			2,497
Corporate debt securities		11,982		4		—			11,986		—		—		—			—		10,422		—		—			10,422		—		—		—			—
Asset-backed securities and other		—		—		—			—		29		—		—			29

	$	48,354	$	24	$	(1	)	$	48,377	$	79,943	$	—	$	(83	)	$	79,860	$	82,913	$	—	$	(100	)	$	82,813	$	27,484	$	—	$	(30	)	$	27,454

Long-term investments:
U.S. treasuries	$	50,535	$	172	$	(9	)	$	50,698	$	15,283	$	—	$	(112	)	$	15,171	$	10,062	$	12	$	(99	)	$	9,975	$	40,865	$	—	$	(229	)	$	40,636
U.S. government sponsored entities		15,989		25		—			16,014		12,107		—		(85	)		12,022		5,372		—		(45	)		5,327		12,618		—		(58	)		12,560
Corporate debt securities		18,261		529		(21	)		18,769		17,219		5		(519	)		16,705		22,503		358		(29	)		22,832		17,841		74		(165	)		17,750
Asset-backed securities and other		8,729		118		(49	)		8,798		10,649		—		(152	)		10,497		7,281		39		(10	)		7,310		6,557		18		(46	)		6,529

	$	93,514	$	844	$	(79	)	$	94,279	$	55,258	$	5	$	(868	)	$	54,395	$	45,218	$	409	$	(183	)	$	45,444	$	77,881	$	92	$	(498	)	$	77,475

The amortized cost and fair value of the Company’s ~~investments in~~ marketable securities,available-for-sale securities that have been in a continuous unrealized loss position consisted of the following (in thousands):


	September 30, 2016					December 31, 2015					September 30, 2017					December 31, 2016
	Unrealized Loss			Fair Value		Unrealized Loss			Fair Value		Unrealized Losses			Fair Value		Unrealized Losses			Fair Value
Less than 12 months	$	(33	)	$	39,367	$	(951	)	$	129,117	$	(172	)	$	72,509	$	(491	)	$	86,105

12 months or longer	$	(47	)	$	2,747	$	—		$	—	$	(111	)	$	21,354	$	(37	)	$	721

Gross realized gains and gross realized losses from the sales of the Company’s marketable securities,available-for-sale securities consisted of the following (in thousands):

The Company may sell certain of its marketable securities,available-for-sale prior to their stated maturities for strategic reasons including, but not limited to, ~~anticipation of~~anticipated capital requirements, anticipated credit deterioration, duration management ~~and~~or when a security no longer meets the criteria of the Company’s investment policy. ~~During the nine months ended September 30, 2016, the Company sold one security, which no longer met the requirements of its investment policy for a loss of $152,000.~~

As of September 30, ~~2016,~~2017, the Company considers the declines in market value of its marketable securities,available-for-sale to be temporary in nature and does not consider any of its investments other-than-temporarily impaired. The Company typically invests in highly-rated securities, and its investment policy generally limits the amount of credit exposure to any one issuer. The policy generally requires investments to be investment grade, with the primary objective of minimizing the potential risk of principal loss and matching long-term liabilities. When evaluating an investment for other-than-temporary impairment the Company reviews factors such as the length of time and extent to which fair value has been below its cost basis, the financial condition of the issuer and any changes thereto, changes in market interest rates and the Company’s intent to sell, or whether it is more likely than not it will be required to sell the investment before recovery of the investment’s cost basis.

Amortized cost and fair value of marketable securities,available-for-sale, by contractual maturity consisted of the following (in thousands):


	September 30, 2016				December 31, 2015				September 30, 2017				December 31, 2016
	Amortized Cost		Fair Value		Amortized Cost		Fair Value		Amortized Cost		Fair Value		Amortized Cost		Fair Value
Due in one year or less	$	48,354	$	48,377	$	79,943	$	79,860	$	82,913	$	82,813	$	27,484	$	27,454
Due after one year through five years		70,627		70,758		28,634		28,465		23,572		23,556		57,309		57,144
Due after five years through ten years		14,998		15,537		18,020		17,466		15,166		15,370		14,992		14,841
Due after ten years		7,889		7,984		8,604		8,464		6,480		6,518		5,580		5,490

	$	141,868	$	142,656	$	135,201	$	134,255	$	128,131	$	128,257	$	105,365	$	104,929


Weighted average contractual maturity		3.2 years				3.3 years				2.6 years				3.5 years

Actual maturities may differ from contractual maturities because certain borrowers have the right to prepay certain obligations with or without prepayment penalties.

In conjunction with theSpin-Off and IPO, notes payable to certain former stockholders of MMREIS were issued in settlement of restricted stock and SARs awards that were redeemed by MMREIS upon the termination of employment by ~~these~~the former stockholders (“the Notes”)~~, which~~. Such notes had been previously assumed by MMC, and were transferred to the Company. The Notes are unsecured and bear interest at 5% with annual principal and interest installments ~~and~~with a final principal payment due during the second quarter of 2020. During each of the nine months ended September 30, ~~2016~~2017 and ~~2015,~~2016, the Company made total payments on the Notes of $1.5 ~~million.~~million, including principal and interest.

Accrued interest included in accounts payable and accrued expenses in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets pertaining to the Notes consisted of the following (in thousands):

Interest expense pertaining to the Notes consisted of the following (in thousands):

Prior to October 2013, the Company operated under a shared services arrangement with MMC whereby the Company was charged for actual costs specifically incurred on behalf of the Company or allocated to the Company on a pro rata basis. Beginning in October 2013, certain services are provided to the Company under a Transition Services Agreement (“TSA”) between MMC and the Company, which replaced thepre-IPO shared services arrangement. The TSA is intended to provide certain services until the Company acquires the services separately. During the three months ended September 30, ~~2016~~2017 and ~~2015,~~2016, the Company incurred ~~$61,000~~net costs of $43,000 and ~~$56,000~~$61,000 under the ~~TSA.~~TSA, respectively. During the nine months ended September 30, ~~2016~~2017 and ~~2015,~~2016, the Company incurred net costs of $168,000 and $185,000 ~~and $165,000~~ under ~~the TSA.~~TSA, respectively. These amounts are included in selling, general and administrative expense in the accompanying condensed consolidated statements of net and comprehensive income.

As of September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, $661,000 and $96,000, respectively, remains unpaid and is included in accounts payable and accrued expenses in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets.

MMC has wholly or majority owned subsidiaries that buy and sell commercial real estate properties. The Company performs certain brokerage and financing services related to transactions of the subsidiaries of MMC. For the three months ended September 30, ~~2016~~2017 and ~~2015,~~2016, the Company generated real estate brokerage commissions and financing fees of $309,000 and $1.1 million, ~~and $305,000,~~ respectively, from subsidiaries of MMC. The Company incurred cost of services of ~~$674,000~~$181,000 and ~~$173,000,~~$674,000, respectively, related to these revenues. For the nine months ended September 30, ~~2016~~2017 and ~~2015,~~2016, the Company generated real estate brokerage commissions and financing fees of ~~$3.5 million~~$632,000 and ~~$1.6~~$3.5 million, respectively, from subsidiaries of ~~MMCs.~~MMC. The Company incurred cost of services of $368,000 and $2.1 million, ~~and $943,000,~~ respectively, related to these revenues.

The Company has an operating lease with MMC for a single story office building located in Palo Alto, California, which ~~was amended in 2016 to extend the expiration date to~~expires on May 31, 2022. Rent expense for this lease aggregated $253,000 ~~and $219,000~~ for each of the three months ended September 30, ~~2016~~2017 and ~~2015, respectively.~~2016. Rent expense for this lease aggregated $759,000 ~~and $474,500~~ for each of the nine months ended September 30, ~~2016~~2017 and ~~2015, respectively.~~2016. Rent expense is included in selling, general and administrative expense in the accompanying condensed consolidated statements of net and comprehensive income.

As of September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, accounts payable and accrued expenses with MMC totaling $91,000 and $303,000, respectively, remain unpaid and are included in accounts payable and accrued expenses in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets.

The Company makes advances tonon-executive employees fromtime-to-time. At September 30, ~~2016~~2017 and December 31, ~~2015,~~2016, the aggregate principal amount for employee ~~loans outstanding~~notes receivable was ~~$546,000~~$605,000 and ~~$382,000,~~$446,000, respectively, which is included in other assets, net current and other assetsnon-current captions in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets. See Note 3 – “Selected Balance Sheet Data” for additional information.

As of September 30, ~~2016,~~2017, George M. Marcus, the Company’s founder andCo-Chairman, beneficially owned ~~55.2%~~approximately 53% of the Company’s issued and outstanding common stock, including shares owned by Phoenix Investments Holdings, LLC ~~(“Phoenix”)~~ and the ~~George and Judy~~ Marcus Family Foundation.

U.S. GAAP defines the fair value of a financial instrument as the amount that would be received from the sale of an asset in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. The Company is responsible for the determination of the value of the investment carried ~~and~~at fair value and the supporting methodologies and assumptions. The Company uses various pricing sources to validate the values utilized.

The degree of judgment used in measuring the fair value of financial instruments is generally inversely correlates with the level of observable valuation inputs. Financial instruments with quoted prices in active markets generally have more pricing observability and less judgment is used in measuring fair value. Financial instruments for which no quoted prices are available have less observability and are measured at fair value using valuation models or other pricing techniques that require more judgment.

Assets recorded at fair value are measured and classified in accordance with a fair value hierarchy consisting of the three “levels” based on the observability of inputs available in the marketplace used to measure the fair values as discussed below:

Level 1: Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets that are accessible at the measurement date for identical, unrestricted assets or liabilities;

Level 2: Quoted prices in markets that are not active, or inputs which are observable, either directly or indirectly, for substantially the full term of the asset or liability; or

Level 3: Inputs reflect management’s best estimate of what market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability at the measurement date. Consideration is given to the risk inherent in the valuation technique and the risk inherent in the inputs to the model.

Investment in marketable securities,available-for-sale and assets held in the rabbi trust are carried at fair value based on observable inputs available. All these securities are measured as Levels 1 or 2 as appropriate. The Company has no investments measured as Level 3.

The Company values its investments including assets held in rabbi trust, commercial paper, money market funds and investments in marketable securities,available-for-sale at fair value on a recurring basis. Fair values were determined for each individual security in the investment portfolio.

Assets carried at fair value are categorized into one of the three categories described above and consisted of the following (in thousands):


	September 30, 2016								December 31, 2015								September 30, 2017								December 31, 2016
	Fair Value		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Fair Value		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Fair Value		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Fair Value		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
Assets held in rabbi trust	$	7,309	$	—	$	7,309	$	—	$	5,661	$	—	$	5,661	$	—	$	8,545	$	—	$	8,545	$	—	$	7,337	$	—	$	7,337	$	—

Money market funds⁽¹⁾	$	60,513	$	60,513	$	—	$	—	$	5,987	$	5,987	$	—	$	—
Cash equivalents⁽¹⁾:
Commercial paper																	$	9,947	$	—	$	9,947	$	—	$	9,987	$	—	$	9,987	$	—
Money market funds																		131,956		131,956		—		—		142,503		142,503		—		—

																	$	141,903	$	131,956	$	9,947	$	—	$	152,490	$	142,503	$	9,987	$	—
																				��
Marketable securities, available-for-sale:
Short-term investments:
U.S. Treasuries	$	24,878	$	24,878	$	—	$	—	$	62,272	$	62,272	$	—	$	—
U.S. Government Sponsored Entities		11,513		—		11,513		—		17,559		—		17,559		—
U.S. treasuries																	$	65,365	$	65,365	$	—	$	—	$	24,957	$	24,957	$	—	$	—
U.S. government sponsored entities																		7,026		—		7,026		—		2,497		—		2,497		—
Corporate debt securities																		10,422		—		10,422		—		—		—		—		—

																	$	82,813	$	65,365	$	17,448	$	—	$	27,454	$	24,957	$	2,497	$	—

Long-term investments:
U.S. treasuries																	$	9,975	$	9,975	$	—	$	—	$	40,636	$	40,636	$	—	$	—
U.S. government sponsored entities																		5,327		—		5,327		—		12,560		—		12,560		—
Corporate debt securities		11,986		—		11,986		—		—		—		—		—		22,832		—		22,832		—		17,750		—		17,750		—
Asset-backed securities and other		—		—		—		—		29		—		29		—		7,310		—		7,310		—		6,529		—		6,529		—

	$	48,377	$	24,878	$	23,499	$	—	$	79,860	$	62,272	$	17,588	$	—	$	45,444	$	9,975	$	35,469	$	—	$	77,475	$	40,636	$	36,839	$	—

Long-term investments:
U.S. Treasuries	$	50,698	$	50,698	$	—	$	—	$	15,171	$	15,171	$	—	$	—
U.S. Government Sponsored Entities		16,014		—		16,014		—		12,022		—		12,022		—
Corporate debt securities		18,769		—		18,769		—		16,705		—		16,705		—
Asset-backed securities and other		8,798		—		8,798		—		10,497		—		10,497		—

	$	94,279	$	50,698	$	43,581	$	—	$	54,395	$	15,171	$	39,224	$	—

There were no transfers in or out of Level 1 and Level 2 during the three and nine months ended September 30, ~~2016.~~2017.

The Company’s cash ~~and cash equivalents,~~held in financial institutions, commissions receivable, amounts due from employees ~~(included in other assets, net current and other assets non-current captions)~~ and investment sales and financing professionals (included in other assets, net current ~~caption)~~and other assetsnon-current captions), accounts payable and accrued expenses and commissions payable (included in deferred compensation and commissions current and deferred compensation and commissionsnon-current captions) are carried at cost, which approximates fair value based on their immediate or short-term maturities and terms which approximate current market ~~rates and are considered to be in the Level 1 classification.~~rates.

~~As the~~The Company’s obligations under notes payable to former stockholders bear fixed interest ~~rates that approximate current interest rates for debt instruments with similar terms and maturities, the~~rates. The Company has determined that the carrying value on these instruments approximates fair value. As the Company’s obligations under SARs liability (included in deferred compensation and ~~commission’s caption)~~commissions current andnon-current captions) bear interest at a variable rate based on U.S. Treasuries, the Company has determined that the carrying value approximates the fair value. ~~These are considered to be in the Level 2 classification.~~

As of September 30, ~~2016~~2017 and December 31, ~~2015,~~2016, there were ~~37,616,243~~38,140,801 and ~~37,396,456~~37,882,266 shares of common stock, $0.0001 par value, issued and outstanding, which includes unvested restricted stock awards issued tonon-employee directors, respectively. See Note 11 – “Earnings per Share” for additional information.

The Company currently does not intend to pay a regular dividend. The Company will evaluate its dividend policy in the future. Any declaration and payment of future dividends to holders of the Company’s common stock will be at the discretion of the board of directors and will depend on many factors, including the Company’s financial condition, earnings, cash flows, capital requirements, level of indebtedness, statutory and contractual restrictions applicable to the payment of dividends and other considerations that the board of directors deems relevant.

The Company has 25,000,000 authorized shares of preferred stock with a par value $0.0001 per share. At September 30, ~~2016~~2017 and December 31, ~~2015,~~2016, there were no preferred shares issued or outstanding.

The components of accumulated other comprehensive income as of September 30, ~~2016,~~2017, by component, net of income taxes consisted of the following (in thousands):

~~In October 2013, the~~The board of directors adopted the 2013 Omnibus Equity Incentive Plan (“2013 Plan”), which became effective upon the Company’s IPO. ~~The~~In February 2017, the board of directors approved an amendment to the 2013 Plan, which was approved by the shareholders in general, authorizes for the granting of incentive stock options, nonstatutory stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock awards (“RSAs”), restricted stock units (“RSUs”), performance units and performance shares to the Company’s and subsidiary corporations’ employees, independent contractors, directors and consultants.May 2017. Grants are made from time to time by the Company’s board of directors at its discretion subject to certain restrictions as to the number and value of shares that may be granted to any individual.

Upon adoption of the 2013 Plan, 5,500,000 shares of common stock were initially reserved for the issuance of ~~awards under the 2013 Plan.~~awards. Pursuant to the automatic ~~increase~~increases previously provided for in the 2013 Plan, the board of directors ~~have~~ approved share reserve increases aggregating ~~2,200,000.~~3,300,000. Pursuant to the amendment to the 2013 Plan referenced above, the automatic share increase provision was removed. At September 30, ~~2016,~~2017, there were ~~4,352,735~~5,459,345 shares available for future grants under the Plan.

In November 2013, MMI issued the following equity awards under the 2013 Plan: (i) Deferred stock units (“DSUs”) for an aggregate of 2,192,413 shares granted as replacement awards related to the prior SARs program to the MMREIS managing directors and (ii) DSUs for 83,334 shares granted to the Company’s Co-chairman of the board of directors, William A. Millichap. The DSU’s are fully vested and shares will be issued ratably over 5 years (see “Amendments to Restricted Stock and SARs” section below). In addition, 30,000 shares, in the form of RSAs, were granted to the Company’s non-employee directors. The shares vest ratably over 3 years. All the above awards were granted based on the IPO price of $12.00.

Under the 2013 Plan, the Company has issued ~~RSA’s~~restricted stock awards (“RSAs”) tonon-employee directors and ~~RSU’s~~restricted stock units (“RSUs”) to employees and independent contractors. ~~All~~Substantially all RSAs vest in equal annual installments over a ~~three year~~three-year period from the date of grant. All RSUs vest in equal annual installments over a ~~five year~~five-year period from the date of grant. Any unvested awards are canceled upon termination of service. Awards accelerate upon death subject to approval by the compensation committee.

During the nine months ended September 30, ~~2016, 239,396~~2017, 272,093 shares of ~~stock-based awards~~RSUs vested of which 277,251 shares of common stock were delivered and ~~41,293~~54,409 shares of common stock were withheld to pay applicable required employee statutory withholding taxes based on the market value of the shares on the vesting date. The amount remitted to the tax authorities for the employees’ tax obligation was reflected in the taxes paid related to net share settlement of stock-based awards caption in the financing section of the condensed consolidated statements of cash flows. The shares withheld for taxes were returned to the share reserve and are available for future issuance in accordance with provisions of the 2013 Plan.

During the nine months ended September 30, 2017, as a result of the adoption of ASU2016-09, any windfall tax benefits, net were recorded as a discrete item in the Company’s provision for income taxes. During the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company recorded windfall tax benefits, net in the amount of $2.7 million, including $157,000 recorded during the nine months ended September 30, 2016 resulting from settlement of stock-based award activity. ~~Such~~Prior to January 1, 2017, such windfall tax benefits, net ~~are~~were excluded from the provision for income taxes and included as a component of additionalpaid-in capital inwhen the ~~accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets and in cash flows provided by (used in) financing activities in the accompanying condensed consolidated statement of cash flows.~~awards were settled. See Note 10 – “Income Taxes” for additional information.

Activity under the 2013 Plan consisted of the following (dollars in thousands, except per share data):

As of September 30, ~~2016, 1,365,445~~2017, 930,419 fully vested ~~DSUs~~deferred stock units (“DSUs”) remained outstanding. See “Amendments to Restricted Stock and SARs” section below and Note 11 – “Earnings Per Share” for additional information. Future share settlements of DSUs by year consisted of the following:

In 2013, the Company adopted the 2013 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (“ESPP Plan”). The ESPP Plan qualifies under Section 423 of the IRS Code and provides for consecutive, ~~non-overlapping 6-month~~non-overlapping6-month offering periods. The offering periods generally start on the first trading day on or after May 15 and November 15 of each year. ~~The first offering period began on May 15, 2014.~~ Qualifying employees may purchase shares of the ~~Company’s~~Company stock at a 10% discount based on the lower of the market price at the beginning or end of the offering period, subject to IRS limitations. The Company determined that the ESPP Plan was a compensatory plan and is required to expense the fair value of the awards over each6-month offering period.

The ESPP Plan ~~has~~initially had 366,667 shares of common stock reserved and ~~289,244~~258,949 shares of common stock remain available for issuance ~~as of~~at September 30, ~~2016.~~2017. The ESPP Plan provides for annual increases in the number of shares available for issuance under the ~~ESPP.~~ESPP, equal to the least of (i) 366,667 shares, (ii) 1% of the outstanding shares on such date, or (iii) an amount determined by the board. Pursuant to the provisions of the ESPP Plan, the board of directors determined a share reserve increase was not ~~needed~~required in ~~2015.~~the prior years. At September 30, ~~2016,~~2017, total unrecognized compensation cost related to the ESPP Plan was ~~$27,000~~$16,000 and is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of ~~0.13~~0.12 years.

In connection with the IPO, the formula settlement value of all outstanding shares of stock held by the plan participants was removed, and all such shares of stock are subject to sales restrictions that lapse at a rate of 20% per year for five years if the participant remains employed by the Company. In the event of death or termination of employment after reaching the age of 67, 100% of the shares of stock will be released from the resale restriction. Further, 100% of the shares of stock will be released from the resale restriction upon the consummation of a change of control of the Company. Of the original 3,689,326 shares subject to resale restriction, 1,455,558 shares remain subject to sales restriction at September 30, 2017.

Prior to the IPO, certain employees were granted SARs. As of March 31, 2013, the outstanding SARs were frozen at the liability amount, and will be paid out to each participant in installments upon retirement or departure under the terms of the revised SARs agreements. To replace beneficial ownership in the SARs, the difference between the book value liability and the fair value of the awards was granted to plan participants in the form of DSUs, which were fully vested upon receipt and will be settled in actual stock at a rate of 20% per year if the participant remains employed by the Company during that period (otherwise all unsettled shares of stock upon termination from service will be settled five years from the termination ~~date)~~date, unless otherwise agreed to by the Company). In the event of death or termination of service after reaching the age of 67, 100% of the DSUs will be settled.

The Company adopted ASU2016-09 on January 1, 2017 and changed its accounting for forfeitures on a prospective basis from estimating awards that are not expected to vest to recording forfeitures when they actually occur. Components of stock-based compensation are included in selling, general and administrative expense in the condensed consolidated statements of net and comprehensive income consisted of the following (in thousands, except common stock price):


	Three Months Ended September 30,					Nine Months Ended September 30,					Three Months Ended September 30,				Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2016		2015			2016			2015		2017		2016		2017		2016
Employee stock purchase plan	$	54	$	56		$	162		$	184	$	31	$	54	$	106	$	162
RSAs – non-employee directors		121		91			319			228		105		121		284		319
RSUs – employees		734		547			2,210			1,626		975		734		2,841		2,210
RSUs – independent contractors⁽¹⁾		924		1,474			2,242			4,712		1,081		924		2,942		2,242

	$	1,833	$	2,168		$	4,933		$	6,750	$	2,192	$	1,833	$	6,173	$	4,933

Common stock price at beginning of period	$	25.41	$	46.14		$	29.14		$	33.25	$	26.36	$	25.41	$	26.72	$	29.14
Common stock price at end of period	$	26.15	$	45.99		$	26.15		$	45.99	$	26.99	$	26.15	$	26.99	$	26.15
Increase (decrease) in stock price	$	0.74	$	(0.15	)	$	(2.99	)	$	12.74	$	0.63	$	0.74	$	0.27	$	(2.99	)

The Company’s effective tax rate for the three and nine months ended September 30, ~~2016~~2017 was 39.3% and 39.0%, compared to 40.0% and 39.9%~~, compared to 42.9% and 41.6%~~ for the three and nine months ended September 30, ~~2015.~~2016. The Company provides for the effects of income taxes in interim financial statements based on the Company’s estimate of its annual effective tax rate for the full year, which is based on forecasted income by jurisdiction where the Company operates, adjusted for the tax effects of items that relate discretely to the period, if any. The difference between the statutory tax rate and the Company’s effective tax rate is largely attributable to state income taxes and a full valuation allowance with respect to the deferred tax assets of the Company’s Canadian operations.

The provision for income taxes differs from the amount computed by applying the statutory federal corporate income tax rate of 35% to income before provision for income taxes and consisted of the following (in thousands):

~~The following table sets forth the computation of basic~~Basic and diluted earnings per share for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, ~~and 2015,~~ respectively, consisted of the following (in thousands, except per share data):


	Three Months Ended September 30,						Nine Months Ended September 30,						Three Months Ended September 30,						Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2016			2015			2016			2015			2017			2016			2017			2016
Numerator (Basic and Diluted):
Net income	$	15,144		$	15,176		$	47,483		$	46,401		$	15,475		$	15,144		$	43,044		$	47,483

Denominator:
Basic
Weighted average common shares issued and outstanding		37,613			37,114			37,588			37,091			38,132			37,613			38,094			37,588
Deduct: Unvested RSAs⁽¹⁾		(39	)		(45	)		(37	)		(44	)		(29	)		(39	)		(29	)		(37	)
Add: Fully vested DSUs⁽²⁾		1,365			1,821			1,365			1,821			930			1,365			930			1,365

Weighted Average Common Shares Outstanding		38,939			38,890			38,916			38,868			39,033			38,939			38,995			38,916


Basic earnings per common share	$	0.39		$	0.39		$	1.22		$	1.19		$	0.40		$	0.39		$	1.10		$	1.22

Diluted
Weighted Average Common Shares Outstanding from above		38,939			38,890			38,916			38,868			39,033			38,939			38,995			38,916
Add: Dilutive effect of RSUs, RSAs & ESPP		183			270			118			183			171			183			141			118

Weighted Average Common Shares Outstanding		39,122			39,160			39,034			39,051			39,204			39,122			39,136			39,034


Diluted earnings per common share	$	0.39		$	0.39		$	1.22		$	1.19		$	0.39		$	0.39		$	1.10		$	1.22


Antidilutive shares excluded from diluted earnings per common share⁽³⁾		94			31			489			77			205			94			381			489

On June 18, 2014, the Company entered into a Credit Agreement with Wells Fargo Bank, National Association (“Bank”), dated as of June 1, 2014 (the “Credit Agreement”). The Credit Agreement provides for a $60.0 million principal amount senior secured revolving credit facility that is guaranteed by all of the Company’s domestic subsidiaries (the “Credit Facility”), which, as amended, matures on June 1, 2019. The Company may borrow, repay and reborrow amounts under the Credit Facility until its maturity date, at which time all amounts outstanding under the Credit Facility must be repaid in full.

Borrowings under the Credit Agreement are available for general corporate purposes and working capital. The Credit Facility includes a $10.0 million sublimit for the issuance of standby letters of credit of which $533,000 was utilized at September 30, ~~2016.~~2017. Borrowings under the Credit Facility will bear interest, at the Company’s option, at either the (i) Base Rate (defined as the highest of (a) the Bank’s prime rate, (b) the Federal Funds Rate plus 1.5% and(c) one-month LIBOR plus 1.5%), or (ii) at a variable rate between 0.875% and 1.125% above LIBOR, based upon the total funded debt to EBITDA ratio. In connection with executing the Credit Agreement, as amended the Company paid bank fees and other expenses, which are being amortized over the remaining term of the Credit Agreement. The Company pays a commitment fee of up to 0.1% per annum, payable quarterly, based on the amount of unutilized commitments under the Credit Facility. The amortization and commitment fee is included in interest expense in the accompanying condensed consolidated statements of net and comprehensive income and was ~~$29,000~~$28,000 and ~~$32,000~~$29,000 during the three months ended September 30, ~~2016~~2017 and ~~2015,~~2016, respectively and ~~$88,000~~$83,000 and ~~$100,000~~$88,000 during the nine months ended September 30, ~~2016~~2017 and ~~2015,~~2016, respectively. As of September 30, ~~2016,~~2017, there were no amounts outstanding under the Credit Agreement.

The Credit Facility contains customary covenants, including financial and other covenant reporting requirements and events of default. Financial covenants require the Company, on a combined basis with its guarantors, to maintain (i) an EBITDAR Coverage Ratio (as defined in the Credit Agreement) of not less than 1.25:1.0 as of each quarter end and (ii) total funded debt to EBITDA not greater than 2.0:1.0 as of each quarter end both on a rolling4-quarter basis. The Credit Facility is secured by substantially all assets of the Company, including pledges of 100% of the stock or other equity interest of each subsidiary except for the capital stock of a controlled foreign corporation (as defined in the Internal Revenue Code). As of September 30, ~~2016,~~2017, the Company was in compliance with all financial andnon-financial covenants.

The Company is subject to various legal proceedings and claims that arise in the ordinary course of business, some of which involve claims for damages that are substantial in amount. Most of these litigation matters are covered by insurance which contain deductibles, exclusions, claim limits and aggregate policy limits. While the ultimate liability for these legal proceeding cannot be determined, the Company reviews the need for its accrual for loss contingencies quarterly and records an accrual for litigation related losses where the likelihood of loss is both probable and estimable. The Company believes that the ultimate resolution of the legal proceedings will not have a material adverse effect on its financial condition or results of operations. The Company accrues legal fees for litigation as the legal services are provided.

21In connection with certain agreements with investment sales and financing professionals, the Company may agree to advance amounts to its investment sales and financing professionals upon reaching certain performance goals. Such commitments as of September 30, 2017 aggregated $1.1 million.

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Unless the context requires otherwise, the words “Marcus & Millichap,” “Marcus & Millichap Real Estate Investment Services,” “MMREIS,” “we,” the “Company,” “us” and “our” refer to Marcus & Millichap, Inc., Marcus & Millichap Real Estate Investment Services, Inc. and its other consolidated subsidiaries.

The following discussion contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. Our actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements as a result of many factors. The results of operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, ~~2016~~2017 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the full year ending December 31, ~~2016,~~2017, or for any other future period. The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto included in Item 1 of this Form10-Q and in conjunction with our Annual Report on Form10-K for the year ended December 31, ~~2015~~2016 filed with the SEC on March ~~15, 2016,~~16, 2017, including the “Risk Factors” section and the consolidated financial statements and notes included therein.

We are a leading national brokerage firm specializing in commercial real estate investment sales, financing, research and advisory services. We have been the top commercial real estate investment broker in the United States based on the number of investment transactions over the last 10 years.

As of September 30, ~~2016,~~2017, we had ~~1,671~~1,757 investment sales and financing professionals that are primarily exclusive independent contractors operating in 8179 offices who provide real estate brokerage and financing services to sellers and buyers of commercial real estate. We also offer market research, consulting and advisory services to our clients. During the three and nine months ended September 30, ~~2016,~~2017, we closed ~~2,391~~2,278 and ~~6,686~~6,536 investment sales, financing and other transactions with total volume of approximately ~~$11.1~~$10.1 billion and ~~$31.4~~$29.9 billion, respectively. During the year ended December 31, ~~2015,~~2016, we closed ~~8,715~~8,995 sales, financing and other transactions with total volume of approximately ~~$37.8~~$42.3 billion.

We generate revenues by collecting real estate brokerage commissions upon the sale, and fees upon the financing, of commercial properties and by providing consulting and advisory services. Real estate brokerage commissions are typically based upon the value of the property, and financing fees are typically based upon the size of the loan. For the three months ended September 30, ~~2016,~~2017, approximately 92% of our revenues were generated from real estate brokerage commissions, 6% from financing fees and 2% from other ~~revenues.~~revenues, including consulting and advisory services. For the nine months ended September 30, ~~2016,~~2017, approximately ~~93%~~91% of our revenues were generated from real estate brokerage commissions, 6%7% from financing fees and 1%2% from other ~~revenues.~~revenues, including consulting and advisory services. During the year ended December 31, ~~2015,~~2016, approximately 92% of our revenues were generated from real estate brokerage commissions, 6% from financing fees and 2% from other revenues, including consulting and advisory services.

We divide commercial real estate into four major market segments, characterized by price:

Our strength is in serving private clients in the ~~$1-~~$1-$10 million private client market segment, which contributed approximately 68% ~~and 70%~~ of our real estate brokerage commissions during each of the three months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, and ~~2015, respectively~~approximately 69% and ~~approximately~~ 67% ~~and 69%~~ of our real estate brokerage commissions during the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, ~~and 2015,~~ respectively.

The following tables set forth the number of transactions, sales volume and ~~revenue~~revenues by commercial real estate market segment for real estate brokerage:

We continue to increase our presence in the United States and Canada through execution of our growth strategies by targeting markets based on population, employment, level of commercial real estate sales, inventory and competitive ~~landscape~~ opportunities where we believe the markets will benefit from our business model. The following charts set forth the percentage of transactions by region for real estate brokerage.

We continue to see consistent increases in the number of brokerage transactions (8.1%) and volumes (6.3%) in the private client market segment during the first nine months of 2016, compared to the same period in the prior year. Our focused and targeted office expansion and an increase in the number of our specialized investment sales professionals, continues to expand our position in this significant market segment.

We achieved an overall increase in the number of transactions (8.9%) and volume (13.6%) in our specialty property types in the first nine months of 2016, compared to the same period in the prior year due to the work of our specialty directors in partnership with our regional managers supporting our sales force and driving growth of activities in these property types. The brokerage, financing and other activities in the middle market and larger transaction market segments continued to show growth in the number of transactions (8.0% and 35.2%, respectively) and volume (9.0% and 43.7%, respectively) during the first nine months of 2016 as a result of deployment of our proprietary marketing tools and development of strong credentials of our Institutional Property Advisors (IPA) division.

Continued expansion and integration of our financing services at the office level has provided our clients with a broad range of financing opportunities. This strategy has produced growth both in the number of transactions (6.6%) and volume (10.1%) of financings during the first nine months of 2016, compared to the same period in the prior year.

Our business and our operating results, financial condition and liquidity are significantly affected by the number and size of commercial real estate investment sales and financing transactions we close in any period. The number and size of these transactions are affected by our ability to recruit and retain investment sales and financing professionals, identify and contract properties for sale and those that need financing and refinancing. We principally monitor the commercial real estate market through ~~the~~ four factors, which generally drive our business. ~~They include~~The factors are the economy, commercial real estate supply and demand, the capital markets and investment sentiment and investment activity.

Our business is dependent on economic conditions within the markets in which we operate. Changes in the economy on a global, national, regional or local basis can have a positive or a negative impact on our business. Economic indicators and projections related to job growth, unemployment, interest rates, ~~and~~ construction and vacancies can have a positive or a negative impact on our business. Overall market conditions can have an effect on investor sentiment and, ultimately, the demand for our services from investors in real estate. Significant disasters such as the hurricanes that recently struck Texas and Florida can also affect local economies and investor behavior. The post-disaster assessment and recovery process can delayin-process transactions or change investor decisions to hold, buy or sell commercial real estate. Our national footprint allows us to support our clients in balancing the opportunities and risks of changing regional economic conditions. We believe the U.S. economy ~~once again showed durability~~remains durable, given the moderate economic gains through the first three quarters of 2017. Job creation through the first nine months of 2017 has been marginally slower than the same period in 2016. Most notably, the ~~face of international~~preliminary post-hurricane job losses reported for September raise questions about continued employment growth, ~~concerns, including~~but the ~~Brexit vote. The U.S. saw a continued~~reported losses could be revised and/or offset as Texas and Florida recover from the disasters. Unemployment has tightened, supporting moderate wage growth and total job openings remain elevated. We believe sentiment about economic expansion in ~~jobs~~2017 remains cautiously optimistic, but still faces some uncertainty surrounding fiscal policy, taxes, deregulation and ~~GDP during 2016.~~other initiatives by the Trump administration that continue to weigh on sentiment.

Our business is dependent on the willingness of investors to invest in or sell commercial real estate, which is affected by factors beyond our control. These factors include the supply of commercial real estate coupled with user demand for ~~those~~these properties and the performance of real estate assets when compared with ~~the performance of~~ other ~~investments~~investment alternatives, such as stocks and bonds. Despite the generally moderate pace of economic ~~recovery~~growth over the past eight years, we believe ~~the investment in~~commercial real estate ~~continues to be~~offers a compelling ~~investment~~option for investors, as real estate fundamentals generally remain ~~strong. Vacancies remain tight~~balanced. Theslow-but-steady economic gains have generated demand while keeping construction levels limited for most property ~~types. Construction is modest relative~~types on a national scale, although construction has begun to elevate for some property types in certain metropolitan areas. We believe the maturing cycle, combined with the current ~~stage~~uncertainty around forecasted growth, inflation trends and interest rates have caused investors and lenders to assume more cautious underwriting assumptions resulting in a slowdown in sales. Furthermore, many investors are delaying transactions in anticipation of ~~expansion. These~~more clarity regarding tax reform, regulatory easing and economic initiatives. We believe a boost to investor sentiment is possible with clarity on government policies and growth initiatives. We believe that these factors should continue to support ~~market~~long-term commercial real estate investor demand ~~and;~~and, therefore, demand for our brokerage and financing ~~service offerings.~~services.

Credit and liquidity issues in the financial markets have a direct impact on the flow of capital to the commercial real estate market. Real estate purchases are often financed with debt and, as a result, credit and liquidity impact transaction activity and prices. Changes in interest rates, as well as steady and protracted movements of interest rates in one direction, ~~(increases~~whether increase or ~~decreases),~~decrease, could adversely or positively affect the operations and income potential of commercial real estate properties. These changes also ~~have an~~ influence on the demand ~~from~~of investors for commercial real estate investments. ~~Mixed~~We believe indications from the U.S. Federal Reserve ~~global concerns about economic growth~~of future interest rate increases, a reduction of the Federal Reserve balance sheet, uncertainty as to the impact of new fiscal policies and ~~the continued downward trend of long-term~~volatility in longer term interest rates ~~globally~~has created a short-term headwind for real estate transactions. In addition, a change of the Chairperson of the Federal Reserve could alter Federal Reserve policies and have ~~created uncertainty about the future of~~a meaningful impact on interest ~~rates.~~rates and investor activity. We continue to see disciplined underwriting from lenders as well as ample liquidity in the market. However, we have seen transactions taking longer to close since late 2016, with buyers exhibiting increased caution in late 2015 and in 2016. We believe the additional due diligence will result in a more stable environment for investors with capital continuing to be available for properties with good economic fundamentals over the long-term but will continue to limit transaction velocity in the short-term.their acquisition process.

We rely on investors to buy and sell properties in order to generate commissions. Investors’ desires to engage in real estate transactions are dependent on many factors that are beyond our control. The economy, supply and demand for properly positioned properties, available credit and market events impact investor sentiment ~~and;~~and, therefore, transaction velocity. In addition, our private clients are often motivated to buy, sell and/or refinance properties due to personal circumstances such as death, divorce, partnership breakups and estate planning. We believe ~~stock market and commodity price volatility and interest rate policy along with the Brexit vote during the first nine months of 2016, have created heightened uncertainty~~that we are in ~~the domestic and the global markets. In addition,~~ a maturing real estate ~~cycle~~cycle. Through the first three quarters of 2017, the sales transaction market has continued to step-down from peak levels set in 2015. The combination of interest rate volatility together with uncertainty surrounding the Trump administration’s tax reform, regulatory easing and ~~buyers and lenders exercising heightened underwriting caution are contributing~~infrastructure initiatives have caused a portion of the active investors to assume a ~~flattening trend in~~morewait-and-see attitude toward investment decisions. Once additional clarity regarding these policies emerges, we believe investors will begin to revive their activity levels based on their ability to better understand the market ~~sales.~~for commercial real estate. We believe ~~an attractive investment backdrop continues in~~that the ~~commercial real estate market despite these events; however, with lower growth rates than experienced in the past.~~

~~Our real estate brokerage commissions~~healthy property fundamentals and ~~financing fees have tended to be seasonal and, combined with other factors, can affect an investor’s ability to compare our financial condition and results~~lack of operations on a quarter-by-quarter basis. Historically, this seasonality has generally caused our revenue, operating income, net income and cash flows from operating activities to be lower in the first half of the year and higher in the second half of the year, particularly in the fourth quarter. The concentration of earnings and cash flows in the last six months of the year, particularly in the fourth quarter, is due to an industrywide focus of clients to complete transactions towards the end of the calendar year. This historical trend can be disrupted both positively and negatively by major economic or political events impacting investor sentiment for a particular property type or location, volatility in financial markets, current and future projections of interest rates, attractiveness of other asset classes, market liquidity and the extent of limitations or availability of capital allocations for larger property buyers, among others. Private client investors may accelerate or delay transactions due to personal or business related reasons unrelated to economic events. In addition, our operating margins are typically lowerover-leveraging during the second half of each year due to our commission structure for some of our senior investment sales and financing professionals. These senior investment sales and financing professionals are on a graduated commission schedule that resets annually in which higher commissions are paid for higher sales volumes. Our historical pattern of seasonality may or may not continue to the same degree experienced in prior years.past several years support an active, but more tempered, market environment.

Management has determined that each of the Company’s offices on a consolidated basis represent individual operating segments with similar economic characteristics that meet the criteria for aggregation into a single reportable segment for financial statement purposes. ~~The Company’s financing operations do not meet the thresholds to be presented as a separate reportable segment.~~

Our revenues are primarily generated from our real estate investment sales business. In addition to real estate brokerage commissions, we generate revenues from financing fees and from other revenues, which are primarily comprised of consulting and advisory fees.

Our business is transaction oriented and, as such, we rely on investment sales and financing professionals to continually develop leads, identify properties to sell, market those properties and close the sale timely to generate a consistent flow of revenue. While our sales volume is impacted by ~~the~~ seasonality factors, ~~discussed above,~~ the timing of closings is also dependent on many market and personal factors unique to a particular client or transaction, particularly clients transacting in the ~~$1-~~$1-$10 million private client market segment. These factors can cause transactions to be accelerated or delayed beyond our control. Further, commission rates earned are generally inversely related to the value of the property sold. As a result of our expansion into the middle and larger transaction market segments, we have seen our overall commission rates fluctuate fromperiod-to-period as a result of changes in the relative mix of the number and volume of transactions closed in the middle and larger transaction market segments as compared to the ~~$1-~~$1-$10 million private client market segment. These factors may result inperiod-to-period variations in our revenues ~~different~~that differ from historical patterns.

A small percentage of our transactions include retainer fees and/or breakage fees. Retainer fees are credited against a success-based fee upon the closing of a transaction or a breakage fee. Transactions that are terminated before completion will sometimes generate breakage fees, which are usually calculated as a set amount or a percentage of the fee we would have received had the transaction closed.

We earn real estate brokerage commissions by acting as a broker for commercial real estate owners seeking to sell or investors seeking to buy properties. Revenues from real estate brokerage commissions are typically recognized at the close of escrow.

We earn financing fees by securing financing on purchase transactions or by securing refinancing of our clients’ existing mortgage debt. We recognize financing fee revenues at the time the loan closes and we have no remaining significant obligations for performance in connection with the transaction. To a lesser extent, we also earn ancillary fees associated with financing activities.

Other revenues include fees generated from consulting and advisory services performed by our investment sales professionals, as well as referral fees from other real estate brokers. Revenues from these services are recognized as they are performed and completed.

Our operating expenses consist of cost of services, selling, general and administrative expenses and depreciation and amortization. The significant components of our expenses are further described below.

The majority of our cost of services expense is ~~commission expense.~~predominately variable commissions paid to our investment sales professionals and compensation-related costs related to our financing activities. Commission expenses are directly attributable to providing services to our clients for investment sales and financing services. Most of our investment sales and financing professionals are independent contractors and are paid commissions; however, there are some who are initially paid a salary and certain of our financing professionals are employees and, as such, costs of services also include employee-related compensation, employer taxes and benefits for those employees. The commission rates we pay to our investment sales and financing professionals vary based on individual contracts negotiated and are generally higher for the more experienced professionals. Some of our most senior investment sales and financing professionals also have the ability to earn additional commissions after meeting certain annual revenue thresholds. These additional commissions are recognized as cost of services in the period in which they are earned. Payment of a portion of these additional commissions are generally deferred for a period of three years, at the Company’s election and paid at the beginning of the fourth calendar year. Cost of services also includes referral fees paid to other real estate brokers where the Company is the principal service provider. Cost of services, therefore, can vary based on the commission structure of the independent contractors that closed transactions in any particular period.

The largest expense component within selling, general and administrative expenses is personnel expenses for our management team and sales and support staff. In addition, these costs include facilities costs (excluding depreciation and amortization), staff related expenses, sales, marketing, legal, telecommunication, network, data sources and other administrative expenses. Also included in selling, general and administrative are expenses for stock-based compensation tonon-employee directors, employees and independent contractors (i.e. investment sales and financing professionals) under the 2013 Omnibus Equity Incentive Plan, as amended (“2013 Plan”) and the 2013 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (“2013 ESPP Plan”).

Depreciation and amortization expense consists of depreciation and amortization recorded on our computer software and hardware and furniture, fixture and equipment. Depreciation and amortization are provided over estimated useful lives ranging from three to seven years for owned assets or over the lesser of the asset estimated useful lives or the related lease term for leasehold improvements.

Other income (expense), net primarily consists of net gains or losses on our deferred compensation plan assets, interest income and realized gains and losses on our marketable securities,available-for-sale, foreign currency gains and losses and othernon-operating gains and losses.

Interest expense primarily consists of interest expense associated with the ~~SARs~~stock appreciation rights (“SARs”) liability, notes payable to former stockholders and our credit agreement.

We are subject to U.S. and Canadian federal taxes and individual state and local taxes based on the income generated in the jurisdictions in which we operate. Our effective tax rate fluctuates as a result of the change in the mix of our activities in the jurisdictions we operate due to differing tax rates in those ~~jurisdictions. Our provision for income taxes excludes the~~jurisdictions and other permanent items. Prior to December 31, 2016, windfall benefits, net from shares issued in connection with our 2013 Plan and 2013 ESPP ~~Plan.~~Plan were recorded to additional paid in capital. Effective January 1, 2017, as a result of the adoption of ASU2016-09,Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting(“ASU2016-09”), any windfall tax benefits, net are recorded in our provision for income taxes.

We have a long history and significant expertise in our core property types of multifamily, retail, office and industrial. We have expanded our expertise in the specialty property types by hiring and assigning specialty directors to coordinate our national presence in these property types and expand our market share. The following tables set forth the number and sales volume (dollars in billions) of investment sales, financing and other transactions for the three and nine months ended September 30, ~~2016~~2017 compared to the same periods in ~~2015~~2016 by property type:


	Nine Months Ended September 30,														Three Months Ended September 30,
	2016				2015				Change						2017				2016				Change
	Number		Volume		Number		Volume		Number			Volume			Number		Volume		Number		Volume		Number			Volume
Core Property Types:
Multifamily		2,491	$	15.2		2,501	$	12.6		(10	)	$	2.6			780	$	5.0		929	$	5.6		(149	)	$	(0.6	)
Retail		2,660		8.8		2,357		7.5		303			1.3			966		2.7		914		3.1		52			(0.4	)
Office		432		1.7		389		1.6		43			0.1			154		0.7		154		0.6		—			0.1
Industrial		184		0.7		164		0.8		20			(0.1	)		96		0.3		62		0.2		34			0.1

Total Core Property Types		5,767	$	26.4		5,411	$	22.5		356		$	3.9			1,996	$	8.7		2,059	$	9.5		(63	)	$	(0.8	)

Specialty Property Types:
Seniors Housing		65	$	1.3		59	$	0.6		6			0.7
Hospitality		173		0.9		158		1.2		15			(0.3	)		62	$	0.3		48	$	0.2		14		$	0.1
Self-Storage		151		0.8		150		0.7		1			0.1			48		0.3		58		0.3		(10	)		—
Land		203		0.6		206		0.5		(3	)		0.1			70		0.2		81		0.2		(11	)		—
Manufactured Housing																24		0.2		29		0.1		(5	)		0.1
Seniors Housing																18		0.1		34		0.4		(16	)		(0.3	)
Mixed - Use / Other																60		0.3		82		0.4		(22	)		(0.1	)

Total Specialty Property Types																282	$	1.4		332	$	1.6		(50	)	$	(0.2	)

																2,278	$	10.1		2,391	$	11.1		(113	)	$	(1.0	)


															Nine Months Ended September 30,
															2017				2016				Change
															Number		Volume		Number		Volume		Number			Volume
Core Property Types:
Multifamily																2,357	$	15.0		2,491	$	15.2		(134	)	$	(0.2	)
Retail																2,651		8.5		2,660		8.8		(9	)		(0.3	)
Office																484		2.0		432		1.7		52			0.3
Industrial																255		0.9		184		0.7		71			0.2

Total Core Property Types																5,747	$	26.4		5,767	$	26.4		(20	)	$	—

Specialty Property Types:
Hospitality																164	$	0.8		173	$	0.9		(9	)	$	(0.1	)
Self-Storage																143		0.8		151		0.8		(8	)		—
Land																210		0.5		203		0.6		7			(0.1	)
Seniors Housing																41		0.4		65		1.3		(24	)		(0.9	)
Manufactured Housing		91		0.4		65		0.3		26			0.1			63		0.4		91		0.4		(28	)		—
Mixed - Use / Other		236		1.0		206		1.1		30			(0.1	)		168		0.6		236		1.0		(68	)		(0.4	)

Total Specialty Property Types		919	$	5.0		844	$	4.4		75		$	0.6			789	$	3.5		919	$	5.0		(130	)	$	(1.5	)

		6,686	$	31.4		6,255	$	26.9		431		$	4.5			6,536	$	29.9		6,686	$	31.4		(150	)	$	(1.5	)

We regularly review a number of key metrics to evaluate our business, measure our performance, identify trends affecting our business, formulate financial projections and make strategic decisions. During the three months ended September 30, ~~2016~~2017 and ~~2015,~~2016, we closed more than 2,200 and 2,300 ~~and 2,200~~investment sales, financing and other transactions with total volume of approximately ~~$11.1~~$10.1 billion and ~~$9.4~~$11.1 billion, respectively. During the nine months ended September 30, ~~2016~~2017 and ~~2015,~~2016, we closed more than 6,500 and 6,600 ~~and 6,200~~investment sales, financing and other transactions with total volume of approximately ~~$31.4~~$29.9 billion and ~~$26.9~~$31.4 billion, respectively. Such key metrics for real estate brokerage and financing activities are as follows:


	Three Months Ended September 30,						Nine Months Ended September 30,						Three Months Ended September 30,						Nine Months Ended September 30,
Real Estate Brokerage	2016			2015			2016			2015			2017			2016			2017			2016
Average Number of Investment Sales Professionals		1,540			1,415			1,504			1,416			1,658			1,540			1,638			1,504
Average Number of Transactions per Investment Sales Professional		1.06			1.13			3.19			3.19			1.02			1.06			2.94			3.19
Average Commission per Transaction	$	101,591		$	95,202		$	101,868		$	98,708		$	99,798		$	101,591		$	98,143		$	101,868
Average Commission Rate		2.18	%		2.37	%		2.07	%		2.25	%		2.12	%		2.18	%		2.17	%		2.07	%
Average Transaction Size (in thousands)	$	4,663		$	4,009		$	4,926		$	4,395		$	4,714		$	4,663		$	4,525		$	4,926
Total Number of Transactions		1,631			1,596			4,805			4,522			1,697			1,631			4,810			4,805
Total Sales Volume (in millions)	$	7,605		$	6,398		$	23,670		$	19,875		$	8,000		$	7,605		$	21,764		$	23,670

	Three Months Ended September 30,						Nine Months Ended September 30,						Three Months Ended September,						Nine Months Ended September 30,
Specialty Property Types:	2016			2015			2016			2015
Financing													2017			2016			2017			2016
Average Number of Financing Professionals		99			84			98			83			92			99			95			98
Average Number of Transactions per Financing Professional		4.39			4.87			12.35			13.67			4.45			4.39			12.72			12.35
Average Fee per Transaction	$	26,023		$	26,565		$	25,437		$	26,472		$	27,795		$	26,023		$	28,254		$	25,437
Average Fee Rate		0.86	%		0.88	%		0.83	%		0.89	%		0.85	%		0.86	%		0.88	%		0.83	%
Average Transaction Size (in thousands)	$	3,009		$	3,029		$	3,064		$	2,966		$	3,274		$	3,009		$	3,224		$	3,064
Total Number of Transactions		435			409			1,210			1,135			409			435			1,208			1,210
Total Dollar Volume (in millions)	$	1,309		$	1,239		$	3,708		$	3,366
Total Sales Volume (in millions)													$	1,339		$	1,309		$	3,895		$	3,708

Following is a discussion of our results of operations for the three ~~and nine~~ months ended September 30, ~~2016~~2017 and ~~2015.~~2016. The tables included in the period comparisons below provide summaries of our results of operations. Theperiod-to-period comparisons of financial results are not necessarily indicative of future results.

Comparison of Three Months Ended September 30, ~~2016~~2017 and ~~2015~~2016

Below are key operating results for the three months ended September 30, ~~2016~~2017 compared to the three months ended September 30, ~~2015~~2016 (dollar and share amounts in thousands, except per share amounts):


	Three Months Ended September 30,			Percentage of			Three Months Ended September 30,			Percentage of			Change						Three Months Ended September 30, 2017			Percentage of Revenue				Three Months Ended September 30, 2016			Percentage of Revenue				Change
	2016			Revenue			2015			Revenue			Dollar			Percentage									Dollar							Percentage
Revenues:
Real estate brokerage commissions	$	165,695			91.7	%	$	151,942			91.6	%	$	13,753			9.1	%	$	169,357			92.4	%			$	165,695				91.7	%		$	3,662			2.2	%
Financing fees		11,320			6.3			10,865			6.6			455			4.2			11,368			6.2				11,320			6.3				48			0.4
Other revenues		3,619			2.0			3,069			1.8			550			17.9			2,616			1.4				3,619			2.0				(1,003	)		(27.7	)

Total revenues		180,634			100.0			165,876			100.0			14,758			8.9			183,341			100.0				180,634			100.0				2,707			1.5

Operating expenses:
Cost of services		113,852			63.0			102,010			61.5			11,842			11.6			114,803			62.6				113,852			63.0				951			0.8
Selling, general, and administrative expense		40,728			22.6			35,646			21.5			5,082			14.3			42,480			23.2				40,728			22.6				1,752			4.3
Depreciation and amortization expense		1,149			0.6			802			0.5			347			43.3			1,375			0.7				1,149			0.6				226			19.7

Total operating expenses		155,729			86.2			138,458			83.5			17,271			12.5			158,658			86.5				155,729			86.2				2,929			1.9

Operating income		24,905			13.8			27,418			16.5			(2,513	)		(9.2	)		24,683			13.5				24,905			13.8				(222	)		(0.9	)
Other income (expense), net		719			0.4			(464	)		(0.3	)		1,183			(255.0	)		1,172			0.6				719			0.4				453			63.0
Interest expense		(380	)		(0.2	)		(380	)		(0.2	)		—			—			(370	)		(0.2	)			(380	)		(0.2	)			10			(2.6	)

Income before provision for income taxes		25,244			14.0			26,574			16.0			(1,330	)		(5.0	)		25,485			13.9				25,244			14.0				241			1.0
Provision for income taxes		10,100			5.6			11,398			6.9			(1,298	)		(11.4	)		10,010			5.5				10,100			5.6				(90	)		(0.9	)

Net income	$	15,144			8.4	%	$	15,176			9.1	%	$	(32	)		(0.2	)%	$	15,475			8.4	%		$	15,144			8.4	%			331			2.2	%

Adjusted EBITDA⁽¹⁾	$	28,092			15.6	%	$	29,601			17.8	%	$	(1,509	)		(5.1	)%	$	28,499			15.5	%		$	28,092			15.6	%		$	407			1.4	%

Earnings per share:
Basic	$	0.39					$	0.39											$	0.40						$	0.39
Diluted	$	0.39					$	0.39											$	0.39						$	0.39
Weighted average common shares outstanding:
Basic		38,939						38,890												39,033							38,939
Diluted		39,122						39,160												39,204							39,122

Our total revenues were ~~$180.6~~$183.3 million for the three months ended September 30, ~~2016~~2017 compared to ~~$165.9~~$180.6 million for the same period in ~~2015,~~2016, an increase of ~~$14.8~~$2.7 million, or ~~8.9%~~1.5%. Total revenues increased primarily as a result of ~~increases~~an increase in real estate brokerage commissions, ~~which contributed substantially all of the total increase. An increase~~partially offset by a decrease in ~~financing fees and an increase in~~ other ~~revenues contributed the remaining change in total~~ revenues.

Real estate brokerage commissions.Revenues from real estate brokerage commissions increased to ~~$165.7~~$169.4 million for the three months ended September 30, ~~2016~~2017 from ~~$151.9~~$165.7 million for the same period in ~~2015,~~2016, an increase of ~~$13.8~~$3.7 million, or ~~9.1%~~2.2%. The increase was driven by ~~growth~~the increase in ~~the average transaction size (16.3%) and to a lesser extent, number of investment~~ sales ~~transactions (2.2%~~volume (5.2%),. This increase was partially offset by a decrease in average commission rates ~~(19~~(6 basis points) due to a larger proportion of ~~our~~ transactions ~~that closed in~~from the>~~$20 million~~ larger transaction market segment, ~~which generate lower commission rates.~~net of improved rates in the private client market and middle market segments.

Financing fees. Revenues from financing fees increased to ~~$11.3~~$11.4 million for the three months ended September 30, ~~2016~~2017 from ~~$10.9~~$11.3 million for the same period in ~~2015,~~2016, an increase of ~~$0.5 million~~$48,000, or ~~4.2%~~0.4%. The increase was driven by an increase in the number of loan transactions (6.4%) due to an increase in the average number of financing professionals (17.9%), partially offset by a decrease in average commission rate per transaction (2 basis points) due in part to fees from certain larger loan transactions during the three months ended September 30, 2016 as compared to the same period in 2015. Larger loan transactions generally earn a lower fee percentage.

Other revenues.Other revenues ~~increased~~decreased to ~~$3.6~~$2.6 million for the three months ended September 30, ~~2016~~2017 from ~~$3.1~~$3.6 million for the same period in ~~2015, an increase~~2016, a decrease of ~~$0.6~~$1.0 million, or ~~17.9%~~27.7%. The decrease was primarily driven by a decrease in consulting and advisory services during the three months ended September 30, 2017 as compared to the same period in 2016.

Our total operating expenses were ~~$155.7~~$158.7 million for the three months ended September 30, ~~2016~~2017 compared to ~~$138.5~~$155.7 million for the same period in ~~2015,~~2016, an increase of ~~$17.3~~$2.9 million, or ~~12.5%~~1.9%. ~~Expenses increased~~The increase was primarily ~~due to an increase~~driven by increases in ~~cost of services, which is predominantly variable commissions paid to our investment sales professionals and compensation-related costs related to our financing activities. Selling,~~selling, general and administrative ~~costs~~costs. Cost of services and, to a lesser extent, depreciation and amortization increased as well, as described below.

Cost of services.Cost of services for the three months ended September 30, ~~2016~~2017 increased ~~$11.8~~$1.0 million, or ~~11.6%~~0.8% to ~~$113.9~~$114.8 million from ~~$102.0~~$113.9 million for the same period in ~~2015.~~2016. The increase was primarily due to increased commission expenses driven by the related increased revenues noted above. Cost of services as a percent of total revenues ~~increased~~decreased to ~~63.0% for the three months ended September 30, 2016~~62.6% compared to ~~61.5%~~63.0% for the same period in ~~2015~~2016 primarily due to ~~an increase~~a decrease in the proportion of transactions closed by our more senior investment sales professionals who are compensated generally at higher commissions rates, partially offset by ~~a reduction~~an increase in referral fees.

Selling, general and administrative expense.Selling, general and administrative expense for the three months ended September 30, ~~2016~~2017 increased ~~$5.1~~$1.8 million, or ~~14.3%~~4.3%, to ~~$40.7~~$42.5 million from ~~$35.7~~$40.7 million for the same period in ~~2015.~~2016. Increases in our selling, general and administrative expense have been driven by our growth plans and investments in technology, sales and marketing tools and marketing and expansion of our services supporting our investment sales and financing professionals. These initiatives have primarily driven (i) a ~~$1.9~~$1.7 million increase in ~~salaries~~sales operations support and ~~related benefits as a result of increases in headcount in corporate~~promotional marketing expenses to support sales activity and ~~sales office support in connection with our growth and expansion of services supporting our investment sales and financing professionals;~~ (ii) a ~~$1.9~~$0.3 million increase in facilities expenses due to expansion of existing offices; (iii) a $1.2 million increase in sales and promotional marketing expenses to support increased sales activity; and (iv) a $1.1 million increase in other expense categories, net, primarily driven by our expansion and growth.offices. In addition, selling, general and administrative expense increased ~~$1.2~~due to a (i) a $0.4 million increase in stock-based compensation due to fluctuations in our stock price and incremental stock-based awards since third quarter of 2016 and (ii) a $0.2 million increase in legal costs and ~~accruals, primarily driven by a settlement of outstanding litigation during the three months ended September 30, 2015, which reduced legal costs in that period; and decreased~~accruals. These increases were partially offset by (i) a ~~$1.9~~$0.5 million decrease in compensation related costs, including salaries and related benefits and management performance ~~related~~ compensation ~~driven by reduced bonus accruals due to management exceeding performance criteria during three months ended September 30, 2015~~ and (ii) a $0.3 million decrease in ~~stock-based compensation~~other expense ~~due to a decline in the Company’s stock price partially offset by incremental stock-based awards granted since the third quarter of 2015.~~categories, net.

Depreciation and amortization expense.Depreciation and amortization expense increased to ~~$1.1~~$1.4 million for the three months ended September 30, ~~2016~~2017 from ~~$0.8~~$1.1 million for the same period in ~~2015,~~2016, an increase of ~~$0.3~~$0.2 million, or ~~43.3%~~19.7%. The increase is primarily driven by our expansion and growth.

Other income (expense), net increased to ~~$0.7~~$1.2 million for the three months ended September 30, ~~2016~~2017 from ~~$(0.5)~~$0.7 million for the same period in ~~2015.~~2016. The increase was primarily driven by an increase in ~~the value of our deferred compensation plan assets held in the rabbi trust,~~ interest income on our investments in marketable securities, ~~available-for-sale and foreign currency gains related to our Canadian operations.~~available-for-sale.

~~Interest~~There were no significant changes in interest expense ~~was $0.4 million~~ for ~~each of~~ the three months ended September 30, ~~2016 and 2015.~~2017 compared to the same period in 2016.

The provision for income taxes was ~~$10.1~~$10.0 million for the three months ended September 30, ~~2016 as~~2017 compared to ~~$11.4~~$10.1 million in the same period in ~~2015,~~2016, a decrease of ~~$1.3~~$0.1 million, or ~~11.4%~~0.9%. The effective income tax rate for the three months ended September 30, ~~2016~~2017 was ~~40.0%,~~39.3% compared with ~~42.9%~~40.0% for the same period in ~~2015.~~2016. The decrease in the effective tax rate was primarily due to a lower valuation allowance required for our Canadian operations in 2017 and an increase in discrete tax benefits, including the effect of tax windfalls, net from shares issued in connection with our 2013 Plan and 2013 ESPP Plan.

We calculate our provision for income taxes using an annual effective tax rate based on projected taxable income for the year adjusted for the effects of permanent and discrete items. Deferred taxes are adjusted for significant changes in temporary items in the period in which they occur. The future effective tax rate may vary from this estimated annual effective rate due to several factors, including but not limited to, the level of state and foreign jurisdiction activity, future changes in tax laws, the amount of future book versus income tax items that are permanent in nature and changes, if any, in a valuation allowance related to deferred tax assets.

As a result of the adoption of ASU2016-09, effective as of January 1, 2017, the provision for income taxes for the three months ended September 30, 2017 includes the difference in book and tax deductions associated with the settlement of shares under the Company’s 2013 Plan and certain disqualifying dispositions of shares issued under our 2013 ESPP Plan. Such tax benefits were recorded directly to additionalpaid-in capital for the three months ended September 30, 2016.

Below are key operating results for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2016 (dollar and share amounts in thousands, except per share amounts):

Our total revenues were $516.9 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 compared to $528.3 million for the same period in 2016, a decrease of $11.4 million, or 2.2%. Total revenues decreased primarily as a result of a decrease in real estate brokerage commissions, partially offset by increases in financing fees and other revenues.

Real estate brokerage commissions. Revenues from real estate brokerage commissions decreased to $472.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 from $489.5 million for the same period in 2016, a decrease of $17.4 million, or 3.6%. The decrease was driven by the decrease in sales volume (8.1%). This decrease was partially offset by an increase in average commission rates (10 basis points) primarily due to improved rates in the middle market transaction segment.

Financing fees. Revenues from financing fees increased to $34.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 from $30.8 million for the same period in 2016, an increase of $3.4 million, or 10.9%. The increase was driven by growth in sales volume (5.0%) primarily due to an increase in refinancing transactions and an increase in average fee rates (5 basis points).

Other revenues. Other revenues increased to $10.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 from $8.0 million for the same period in 2016, an increase of $2.7 million, or 33.4%. The increase was primarily driven by an increase in consulting and advisory services during the nine months ended September 30, 2017 as compared to the same period in 2016.

Our total operating expenses were $448.2 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 compared to $449.7 million for the same period in 2016, a decrease of $1.5 million, or 0.3%. The decrease was primarily due to a decrease in cost of services. This decrease was partially offset by increases in selling, general and administrative costs and to a lesser extent depreciation and amortization expense, as described below.

Cost of services.Cost of services for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 decreased approximately $8.3 million, or 2.6% to $314.8 million from $323.1 million for the same period in 2016. The decrease was primarily due to decreased commission expenses driven by the related decreased revenues noted above. Cost of services as a percent of total revenues decreased to 60.9% for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 compared to 61.2% for the same period in 2016 primarily due to a decrease in the proportion of transactions closed by our more senior investment sales professionals who are compensated generally at higher commissions rates, partially offset by an increase in referral fees.

Selling, general and administrative expense. Selling, general and administrative expense for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 increased $6.0 million, or 4.9%, to $129.4 million from $123.4 million for the same period in 2016. Increases in our selling, general and administrative expense have been driven by our growth plans and investments in technology, sales and marketing tools and marketing and expansion of our services supporting our investment sales and financing professionals. These initiatives have primarily driven (i) a $4.8 million increase in sales operations support and promotional marketing expenses to support sales activity and (ii) a $1.7 million increase in facilities expenses due to expansion of existing offices. In addition, selling, general and administrative expense increased due to (i) a $1.2 million increase in stock-based compensation due to fluctuations in our stock price and incremental stock-based awards since third quarter of 2016 and (ii) a $0.6 million increase in legal costs and accruals. These increases were partially offset by (i) a $1.6 million decrease in compensation related costs, including salaries and related benefits and management performance compensation primarily due to internal realignments and (ii) a $0.7 million decrease in other expense categories, net.

Depreciation and amortization expense.Depreciation and amortization expense increased to $4.0 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 from $3.2 million for the same period in 2016, an increase of $0.8 million, or 25.6%. The increase is primarily driven by our expansion and growth.

Other income (expense), net increased to $3.0 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 from $1.6 million for the same period in 2016. The increase was primarily driven by an increase in interest income on our investments in marketable securities,available-for-sale and value of our deferred compensation plan assets held in the rabbi trust. The increase was partially offset by realized losses on our investments in marketable securities,available-for-sale, primarily due to a security sold during the first quarter of 2016, which no longer met our investment policy criteria.

There were no significant changes in interest expense for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 compared to the same period in 2016.

The provision for income taxes was $27.6 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 compared to $31.5 million in the same period in 2016, a decrease of $4.0 million, or 12.6%. The effective ~~state~~income tax rate ~~primarily as a result of changes~~for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 was 39.0%, compared with 39.9%, for the same period in 2016. The decrease in the ~~Company’s state apportionment~~effective tax rate was primarily due to a lower valuation allowance required for our Canadian operations in 2017 and ~~the associated~~an increase in discrete tax ~~expense recognized~~benefits, including the effect of tax windfalls, net from shares issued in ~~2015.~~connection with our 2013 Plan and 2013 ESPP Plan.

~~The provisions~~As a result of the adoption of ASU2016-09, effective as of January 1, 2017, the provision for income taxes ~~excludes~~for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 includes the difference in book and tax deductions associated with the settlement of shares under the Company’s 2013 Plan and certain disqualifying dispositions of shares issued ~~from~~under our 2013 ESPP Plan. Such tax benefits were recorded directly to additionalpaid-in ~~capital.~~

~~Below are key operating results~~ capital for the nine months ended September 30, ~~2016 compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2015 (dollar and share amounts in thousands, except per share amounts):~~2016.

Our total revenues were $528.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 compared to $485.9 million for the same period in 2015, an increase of $42.4 million, or 8.7%. Total revenues increased primarily as a result of increases in real estate brokerage commissions, which contributed substantially all of the total increase. A slight increase in financing fees, partially offset by a decrease in other revenues contributed the remaining change in total revenues.

~~Real estate brokerage commissions.~~Revenues from real estate brokerage commissions increased to $489.5 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 from $446.4 million for the same period in 2015, an increase of $43.1 million, or 9.7%. The increase was driven by a combination of the growth in the number of investment sales transactions (6.3%) and average transaction size (12.1%), partially offset by a decrease in average commission rates (18 basis points) due to a larger proportion of our transactions that closed in the>~~$20 million larger transaction market segment, which generate lower commission rates.~~

~~Financing fees.~~ Revenues from financing fees increased to $30.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 from $30.0 million for the same period in 2015, an increase of $0.7 million or 2.4%. The increase was driven by an increase in the number of loan transactions (6.6%) due to an increase in the average number of financing professionals (18.1%), partially offset by a decrease in average fee rates (6 basis points) due in part to fees from certain larger loan transactions during the nine months ended September 30, 2016 as compared to the same period in 2015. Larger loan transactions generally earn a lower fee percentage.

~~Other revenues.~~Other revenues decreased to $8.0 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 from $9.5 million for the same period in 2015, a decrease of $1.5 million or 15.4%. The decrease was primarily driven by a decrease in consulting and advisory services during the nine months ended September 30, 2016 as compared to the same period in 2015.

Our total operating expenses were $449.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 compared to $405.2 million for the same period in 2015, an increase of $44.5 million, or 11.0%. Expenses increased primarily due to an increase in cost of services, which is predominantly variable commissions paid to our investment sales professionals and compensation-related costs related to our financing activities. Selling, general and administrative costs and to a lesser extent depreciation and amortization increased as well, as described below.

~~Cost of services.~~Cost of services for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 increased $29.4 million, or 10.0% to $323.1 million from $293.7 million for the same period in 2015. The increase was primarily due to increased commission expenses driven by the related increased revenues noted above. Cost of services as a percent of total revenues increased to 61.2% for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 compared to 60.4% for the same period in 2015 primarily due to an increase in proportion of transactions closed by our more senior investment sales professionals who are compensated generally at higher commissions rates, partially offset by a reduction in referral fees.

~~Selling, general and administrative expense.~~ Selling, general and administrative expense for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 increased $14.3 million, or 13.1%, to $123.4 million from $109.1 million for the same period in 2015. Increases in our selling, general and administrative expense have been driven by our growth and investments in technology, sales and marketing tools and marketing and expansion of our services supporting our investment sales and financing professionals. These initiatives have primarily driven (i) a $5.7 million increase in salaries and related benefits as a result of increases in headcount in corporate and sales office support in connection with our growth and expansion of services supporting our investment sales and financing professionals; (ii) a $5.1 million increase in facilities expenses due to expansion of existing offices; (iii) a $4.5 million increase in sales and promotional marketing expenses to support increased sales activity and our annual sales recognition event; and (iv) a $2.4 million increase in other expense categories, net, primarily driven by our expansion and growth. In addition, selling, general and administrative expense increased $1.7 million due to legal costs and accruals, partly driven by settlement of outstanding litigation and recoveries from a settlement with an insurance carrier during the nine months ended September 30, 2015, which reduced legal costs in that period; and decreased by (i) a $3.3 million in management performance related compensation driven by reduced bonus accruals due to management exceeding performance criteria during the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and (ii) a $1.8 million in stock-based compensation expense due to a decline in the Company’s stock price partially offset by incremental stock-based awards granted since the third quarter of 2015.

~~Depreciation and amortization~~~~expense~~.Depreciation and amortization expense increased to $3.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 from $2.4 million for the same period in 2015, an increase of $0.8 million, or 32.4%. The increase is primarily driven by our expansion and growth and investment in technology to improve the sales and marketing tools.

Other income (expense), net increased to $1.6 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 from $23,000 for the same period in 2015. The increase was primarily driven by an increase in the value of our deferred compensation plan assets held in the rabbi trust, foreign currency gains related to our Canadian operations and interest income on our investments in marketable securities, available-for-sale. The increase was partially offset by realized losses on our investments in marketable securities, available-for-sale, due to a security sold during the nine months ended September 30, 2016, which no longer met criteria our investment policy.

~~Interest expense decreased to $1.2 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 from $1.3 million for the same period in 2015, a decrease of $0.2 million, or 14.4%.~~

The provision for income taxes was $31.5 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 as compared to $33.0 million in the same period in 2015, a decrease of $1.5 million or 4.5%. The effective income tax rate for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 was 39.9%, compared with 41.6% for the same period in 2015. The decrease in the effective tax rate was due to a decrease in the effective state tax rate primarily as a result of changes in the Company’s state apportionment and the associated discrete tax expense recognized in 2015.

The provisions for income taxes excludes the difference in book and tax deductions associated with the settlement of shares under the Company’s 2013 Plan and disqualifying dispositions of shares issued from our 2013 ESPP Plan. Such tax benefits, which aggregated $157,000 and $534,000 during the nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively, were recorded directly to additional paid-in capital.

In this quarterly report on Form10-Q, we include anon-GAAP financial measure, adjusted earnings before interest income/expense, taxes, depreciation and amortization and stock-based compensation, or Adjusted EBITDA. We define Adjusted EBITDA as net income before (i) interest ~~income/expense, (ii)~~income and other, including net realized gains (losses) on marketable securities,available-for-sale and cash and cash equivalents, (ii) interest expense, (iii) provision for income ~~tax expense,~~taxes, (iv) depreciation and amortization and (v) stock-based compensation expense. We use Adjusted EBITDA in our business operations to ~~among other things,~~ evaluate the performance of our business, develop budgets and measure our performance against those ~~budgets.~~budgets, among other things. We also believe that analysts and investors use Adjusted EBITDA as a supplemental ~~measures~~measure to evaluate our overall operating performance. However, Adjusted EBITDA has material limitations as an analytical tool and should not be considered in isolation, or as a substitute for analysis of our results as reported under U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“U.S. GAAP”). We find Adjusted EBITDA as a useful tool to assist in evaluating performance because itAdjusted EBITDA eliminates items related to capital structure, ~~and~~ taxes andnon-cash stock-based compensation charges. In light of the foregoing limitations, we do not rely solely on Adjusted EBITDA as a performance measure and also consider our U.S. GAAP results. Adjusted EBITDA is not a measurement of our financial performance under U.S. GAAP and should not be considered as an alternative to net income, operating income or any other measures calculated in accordance with U.S. GAAP. Because Adjusted EBITDA is not calculated in the same manner by all companies, it may not be comparable to other similarly titled measures used by other companies.

A reconciliation of the most directly comparable U.S. GAAP financial measure, net income, to Adjusted EBITDA is as follows (in thousands):


	Three Months Ended September 30,						Nine Months Ended September 30,						Three Months Ended September 30,						Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2016			2015			2016			2015			2017			2016			2017			2016
Net income	$	15,144		$	15,176		$	47,483		$	46,401		$	15,475		$	15,144		$	43,044		$	47,483
Adjustments:
Interest income and other⁽¹⁾		(514	)		(323	)		(1,245	)		(997	)		(923	)		(514	)		(2,293	)		(1,245	)
Interest expense		380			380			1,155			1,349			370			380			1,126			1,155
Provision for income taxes		10,100			11,398			31,524			32,994			10,010			10,100			27,564			31,524
Depreciation and amortization		1,149			802			3,164			2,389			1,375			1,149			3,975			3,164
Stock-based compensation		1,833			2,168			4,933			6,750			2,192			1,833			6,173			4,933

Adjusted EBITDA⁽²⁾	$	28,092		$	29,601		$	87,014		$	88,886		$	28,499		$	28,092		$	79,589		$	87,014

Our primary sources of liquidity are cash and cash equivalents, cash flows from operations, marketable securities,available-for-sale and, if necessary, borrowings under our credit agreement. In order to enhance yield to us, we have invested a portion of our cash in money market funds and in fixed and variable income debt securities, in accordance with our investment policy approved by the board of directors. Certain of our investments in money market funds may not maintain a stable net asset value and may impose fees on redemptions and/or gate fees. Although we have historically funded our operations through operating cash flows, there can be no assurance that we can continue to meet our cash requirements entirely through our operations, cash and cash equivalents, proceeds from the sale of marketable securities,available-for-sale or availability under our credit agreement.

The Company invests excess cash in money market funds. In October 2016, new regulations issued by the SEC in July 2014 went into effect. As a result, certain of the investments in money market funds in which the Company invests may no longer maintain a stable NAV and may impose fees on redemptions and/or gate fees. The Company has evaluated all its investments in money market funds and determined based on current facts and circumstances that they continue to meet the criteria to be classified as cash and cash equivalents.

Cash held in our Canadian operations aggregated ~~$526,000~~$377,000 and ~~$763,000~~$404,000 at September 30, ~~2016~~2017 and December 31, ~~2015,~~2016, respectively.

Our total cash and cash equivalents balance ~~increased~~decreased by ~~$25.8~~$4.7 million to ~~$122.0~~$182.7 million at September 30, ~~2016,~~2017, compared to ~~$96.2~~$187.4 million at December 31, ~~2015.~~2016. The following table sets forth our summary cash flows for the nine months ~~ended~~ September 30, ~~2016~~2017 and ~~2015~~2016 (in thousands):


	Nine Months Ended September 30,						Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2016			2015			2017			2016
Net cash provided by operating activities	$	41,518		$	38,582		$	25,338		$	41,518
Net cash used in investing activities		(14,237	)		(123,805	)		(28,011	)		(14,237	)
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities		(1,513	)		3,696
Net cash used in financing activities								(2,036	)		(1,513	)

Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents		25,768			(81,527	)
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents								(4,709	)		25,768
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period	$	96,185			149,159		$	187,371		$	96,185
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	121,953		$	67,632		$	182,662		$	121,953

Cash flows provided by operating activities were ~~$41.5~~$25.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, ~~2016, as~~2017 compared to ~~$38.6~~$41.5 million for the same period in ~~2015.~~2016. Net cash provided by operating activities is driven by our net income adjusted fornon-cash items and changes in operating assets and liabilities. The ~~$2.9~~$16.2 million ~~increase~~decrease in cash flows provided by operating activities for the nine months ended September 30, ~~2016~~2017 compared to the same period in ~~2015~~2016 was primarily due to ~~the net effect of our growth of business,~~ differences in timing of payments and receipts, an increase in advances to the Company’s investment sales and financing professionals, a decrease in bonus payments due to reduced bonus accruals and a reduction in the deferral of certain discretionary ~~commissions~~ and ~~lower bonus accruals.~~other commissions. Additionally, the Company made distributions of $1.4 million of the SARs liability during the first quarter of 2017 with no such comparable payments during the nine months ended September 30, 2016.

Cash flows used in investing activities were ~~$14.2~~$28.0 million for the nine months ended September 30, ~~2016, as~~2017 compared to ~~$123.8~~$14.2 million cash flows used in investing activities for the same period in ~~2015.~~2016. The ~~decrease~~change in cash flows used in investing activities for the nine months ended September 30, ~~2016, as~~2017 compared to the same period in ~~2015~~2016 was primarily due to ~~$6.8~~$22.6 million in net purchases of marketable securities,available-for-sale for the nine months ended September 30, ~~2016~~2017 compared to ~~$119.9~~$6.8 million net purchases of marketable securities,available-for sale for the same period in ~~2015.~~2016.

Cash flows used in financing activities were ~~$1.5~~$2.0 million for the nine months ended September 30, ~~2016, as~~2017 compared to ~~cash flows provided by financing activities of $3.7~~$1.5 million for the same period in ~~2015.~~2016. The change in cash flows ~~provided by~~used in financing activities for the nine months ended September 30, ~~2016~~2017 compared to the same period in ~~2015,~~2016 was primarily impacted by net changes in stock-based award activity ~~including excess tax benefit from~~and taxes paid related to net share settlement of stock-based ~~award activity.~~awards. See Note 9 – “Stock-Based Compensation Plans” of our Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information.

We believe that our existing balances of cash and cash equivalents, cash flows expected to be generated from our operations, proceeds from the sale of marketable securities,available-for-sale and borrowings available under the credit agreement will be sufficient to satisfy our operating requirements for at least the next twelve months. If we need to raise additional capital through public or private debt or equity financings, strategic relationships or other arrangements, this capital might not be available to us in a timely manner, on acceptable terms, or at all. Our failure to raise sufficient capital when needed could prevent us from, among other factors, to fund acquisitions or to otherwise finance our growth or operations. In addition, our notes payable to former stockholders and SARs liability have provisions, which could accelerate repayment of outstanding principal and accrued interest and adversely impact our liquidity.

There have been no material changes in our commitments under contractual obligations, as disclosed in our Annual Report on Form10-K for the year ended December 31, ~~2015~~2016 other than an ~~acceleration~~increase of ~~payments~~operating lease obligations of ~~the SARs liability and Deferred Compensation Plan liability~~$6.9 million due to the retirement of certain participants. Anticipated payments increased $3.8 million (1-3 years) and $3.6 million (3-5 years) and decreased $7.3 million (more than 5 years) and $3.6 million (other) from those reported as of December 31, 2015.new or extended leases.

Our commissions and other variable costs related to revenue are primarily affected by real estate market supply and demand, which may be affected by general economic conditions including inflation. However, to date, we do not believe that general inflation has had a material impact upon our operations.

We prepare our financial statements in accordance with U.S. GAAP. In applying many of these accounting principles, we make assumptions, estimates and/or judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses in our consolidated financial statements. We base our estimates and judgments on historical experience and other assumptions that we believe are reasonable under the circumstances. These assumptions, estimates and/or judgments, however, are often subjective and our actual results may change based on changing circumstances or changes in our analyses. If actual amounts are ultimately different from our estimates, the revisions are included in our results of operations for the period in which the actual amounts become known. There were no material changes in our critical accounting policies, as disclosed in in our Annual Report on Form10-K for the year ended December 31, ~~2015.~~2016.

For information regarding recent accounting pronouncements, see Note 1 – “Description of ~~business, basis~~Business, Basis of ~~presentation~~Presentation and ~~recent accounting pronouncements”~~Recent Accounting Pronouncements” of our Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

We maintain a portfolio of investments in a variety of fixed and variable rate debt securities, including U.S. government and federal agency securities, corporate debt securities and asset backed securities. As of September 30, ~~2016,~~2017, the fair value of investments in marketable securities,available-for-sale was ~~$142.7~~$128.3 million. The primary objective of our investment activity is to maintain the safety of principal, provide for future liquidity requirements while maximizing yields without significantly increasing risk. While some investments may be securities of companies in foreign countries, all investments are denominated and payable in U.S. Dollars. We do not enter into investments for trading or speculative purposes. While our intent is not to sell these investment securities prior to ~~maturity,~~their stated maturities, we may choose to sell any of the securities ~~based on market opportunities~~for strategic reasons including, but not limited to, ~~enhance our overall yield or maintain compliance with our~~anticipated capital requirements, anticipation of credit deterioration, duration management and when a security no longer meets the criteria of the Company’s investment policy. We do not use derivatives or similar instruments to manage our interest rate risk. We seek to invest in high quality ~~investments, with a~~investments. The weighted average rating (exclusive of cash and cash equivalents) ~~of AA+~~was AA as of September 30, ~~2016.~~2017. Maturities are maintained consistent with our ~~short, medium~~short-, medium- and long-term liquidity objectives.

Currently, our portfolio of investments predominantly consists of fixed interest rate debt securities; however, a portion of our investment portfolio may consist of variable interest rate debt securities. Our investments in fixed interest rate debt securities are subject to market risk. Changes in prevailing interest rates may adversely impact their fair market value should interest rates generally rise or fall. Accordingly, we also may have interest rate risk with the variable rate debt securities as the income produced may decrease if interest rates fall. The following table sets forth the impact on the fair value of our investments from changes in interest rates based on the duration of the securities (dollars in thousands):

Due to the nature of our business and the manner in which we conduct our operations, we believe we do not face any material interest rate risk with respect to other assets and liabilities, equity price risk or other market risks. The functional currency of our Canadian operations is the Canadian dollar. We are exposed to foreign currency exchange rate risk for the settlement of transactions of the Canadian operations as well as unrealized translation adjustments. To date, realized foreign currency exchange rate gains and losses have not been material.

As of September 30, ~~2016,~~2017, our management, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures defined in Rules13a-15(e) and15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act. Based upon that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that, as of September 30, ~~2016,~~2017, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective in ensuring that material information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms, including ensuring that such material information is accumulated by and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

The design of any system of control is based upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated objectives under all future events, no matter how remote, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may not deteriorate. Because of its inherent limitations, disclosure controls and procedures may not prevent or detect all misstatements. Accordingly, even effective disclosure controls and procedures can only provide reasonable assurance of achieving their control objectives.

There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the quarter ended September 30, ~~2016~~2017 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

We are involved in claims and legal actions arising in the ordinary course of our business some of which involve claims for damages that are substantial in amount. Most of these litigation matters are covered by insurance which contain deductibles, exclusions, claim limits and aggregate policy limits. Such litigation and other proceedings may include, but are not limited to, actions relating to commercial relationships, standard brokerage disputes like the alleged failure to disclose physical or environmental defects or property expenses or contracts, the alleged inadequate disclosure of matters relating to the transaction like the relationships among the parties to the transaction, potential claims or losses pertaining to the asset, vicarious liability based upon conduct of individuals or entities outside of our control, general fraud claims, conflicts of interest claims, employment law claims, including claims challenging the classification of our investment sales professionals as independent contractors, claims alleging violations of state consumer fraud statutes and intellectual property. While the ultimate liability for these legal proceeding cannot be determined, the Company reviews the need for its accrual for loss contingencies quarterly and records an accrual for litigation related losses where the likelihood of loss is both probable and estimable. We do not believe, based on information currently available to us, that the final outcome of these proceedings will have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

For information on our legal proceedings, see Note 12 – “Commitments and Contingencies” of our Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

There have been no material changes from the risk factors described in our Annual Report on Form10-K for the year ended December 31, ~~2015.~~2016.

The documents listed in the Exhibit Index of this quarterly report on Form 10-Q are incorporated by reference or are filed with this quarterly report on Form 10-Q, in each case as indicated therein (numbered in accordance with Item 601 of Regulation S-K).

~~Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.~~

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.


Delaware		35-2478370
(State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

23975 Park Sorrento, Suite 400 Calabasas, California		91302
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)		(Zip Code)


		Page

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1.	Financial Statements

	Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets at September 30, ~~2016~~2017 (Unaudited) and December 31, ~~2015~~2016		3
	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Net and Comprehensive Income for the Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, ~~2016~~2017 and ~~2015~~2016 (Unaudited)		4
	Condensed Consolidated Statement of Stockholders’ Equity for the Nine Months Ended September 30, ~~2016~~2017 (Unaudited)		5
	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Nine Months Ended September 30, ~~2016~~2017 and ~~2015~~2016 (Unaudited)		6
	Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)		8

Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations		22
Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk		3635
Item 4.	Controls and Procedures		3736

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1.	Legal Proceedings		3837
Item 1A.	Risk Factors		3837
Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds		3837
Item 3.	Defaults upon Senior Securities		3837
Item 4.	Mine Safety Disclosures		3837
Item 5.	Other Information		3837
Item 6.	Exhibits		38

SIGNATURES

EXHIBIT INDEX


	Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2016			2015
Cash flows from operating activities
Net income	$	47,483		$	46,401
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization expense		3,164			2,389
Provision for bad debt expense		15			127
Stock-based compensation		4,933			6,750
Deferred taxes, net		(894	)		(3,160	)
Net realized losses (gains) on marketable securities, available-for-sale		119			(130	)
Tax benefit from stock-based award activity		157			4,844
Excess tax benefit from stock-based award activity		(157	)		(4,844	)
Other non-cash items		359			295
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Commissions receivable		(1,159	)		(470	)
Prepaid expenses		555			1,144
Prepaid rent		(3,553	)		(4,538	)
Contributions to rabbi trust		(1,263	)		(1,448	)
Other assets		1,544			(3,993	)
Accounts payable and accrued expenses		309			(2,650	)
Income tax receivable/payable		8,230			4,939
Accrued bonuses and other employee related expenses		(10,495	)		(4,885	)
Deferred compensation and commissions		(8,245	)		(3,191	)
Deferred rent obligation and other liabilities		416			1,002

Net cash provided by operating activities		41,518			38,582
Cash flows from investing activities
Purchases of marketable securities, available-for-sale		(97,311	)		(130,500	)
Proceeds from sales and maturities of marketable securities, available-for-sale		90,476			10,608
Payments received on employee notes receivable		3			15
Issuances of employee notes receivable		(381	)		(175	)
Purchase of property and equipment		(7,049	)		(3,753	)
Proceeds from sale of property and equipment		25			—

Net cash used in investing activities		(14,237	)		(123,805	)
Cash flows from financing activities
Proceeds from issuance of shares pursuant to employee stock purchase plan		402			502
Taxes paid related to net share settlement of stock-based awards		(1,134	)		(756	)
Excess tax benefit from stock-based award activity		157			4,844
Principal payments on notes payable to former stockholders		(938	)		(894	)

Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities		(1,513	)		3,696

Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents		25,768			(81,527	)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period		96,185			149,159

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	121,953		$	67,632


	Unrealized gains and (losses) of available-for- sale securities			Foreign currency translation ⁽²⁾		Total
Beginning balance, December 31, 2015	$	(568	)	$	1,025	$	457
Other comprehensive income before reclassifications		1,152			32		1,184
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income⁽¹⁾		(102	)		—		(102	)

Net current-period other comprehensive income		1,050			32		1,082

Ending balance, September 30, 2016	$	482		$	1,057	$	1,539


	September 30, 2016		December 31, 2015
Accrued interest⁽¹⁾	$	216	$	367


	RSA Grants to Non-employee Directors			RSU Grants to Employees			RSU Grants to Independent Contractors			Total			Weighted- Average Grant Date Fair Value Per Share
Nonvested shares at December 31, 2015		35,364			468,969			521,780			1,026,113		$	21.17

Granted
February 2016		—			172,496			8,856			181,352
March 2016		—			30,000			—			30,000
May 2016		14,742			11,051			8,188			33,981
August 2016		—			12,781			49,608			62,389

Total Granted		14,742			226,328			66,652			307,722			23.79
Vested		(10,998	)		(103,428	)		(124,970	)		(239,396	)		20.03
Forfeited/canceled		—			(37,299	)		(4,135	)		(41,434	)		21.64

Nonvested shares at September 30, 2016⁽¹⁾		39,108			554,570			459,327			1,053,005		$	22.18


Unrecognized stock-based compensation expense as of September 30, 2016⁽²⁾	$	584		$	10,836		$	9,183		$	20,603


Weighted average remaining vesting period (years) as of September 30, 2016		1.97			3.60			2.86			3.22


	September 30, 2017
2017		351,801
2018		351,796
2021		60,373
2022		166,449

		930,419


	Nine Months Ended September 30, 2017			Percentage of Revenue			Nine Months Ended September 30, 2016			Percentage of Revenue			Change
	Nine Months Ended September 30, 2017			Percentage of Revenue			Nine Months Ended September 30, 2016			Percentage of Revenue			Dollar			Percentage
Revenues:
Real estate brokerage commissions	$	472,069			91.3	%	$	489,477			92.7	%	$	(17,408	)		(3.6	)%
Financing fees		34,131			6.6			30,779			5.8			3,352			10.9
Other revenues		10,724			2.1			8,037			1.5			2,687			33.4

Total revenues		516,924			100.0			528,293			100.0			(11,369	)		(2.2	)

Operating expenses:
Cost of services		314,827			60.9			323,131			61.2			(8,304	)		(2.6	)
Selling, general, and administrative expense		129,393			25.0			123,403			23.3			5,990			4.9
Depreciation and amortization expense		3,975			0.8			3,164			0.6			811			25.6

Total operating expenses		448,195			86.7			449,698			85.1			(1,503	)		(0.3	)

Operating income		68,729			13.3			78,595			14.9			(9,866	)		(12.6	)
Other income (expense), net		3,005			0.6			1,567			0.3			1,438			91.8
Interest expense		(1,126	)		(0.2	)		(1,155	)		(0.2	)		29			(2.5	)

Income before provision for income taxes		70,608			13.7			79,007			15.0			(8,399	)		(10.6	)
Provision for income taxes		27,564			5.4			31,524			6.0			(3,960	)		(12.6	)

Net income	$	43,044			8.3	%	$	47,483			9.0	%	$	(4,439	)		(9.3	)%

Adjusted EBITDA⁽¹⁾	$	79,589			15.4	%	$	87,014			16.5	%	$	(7,425	)		(8.5	)%

Earnings per share:
Basic	$	1.10					$	1.22
Diluted	$	1.10					$	1.22
Weighted average common shares outstanding:
Basic		38,995						38,916
Diluted		39,136						39,034


	Nine Months Ended September 30,			Percentage of			Nine Months Ended September 30,			Percentage of			Change
	2016			Revenue			2015			Revenue			Dollar			Percentage
Revenues:
Real estate brokerage commissions	$	489,477			92.7	%	$	446,356			91.9	%	$	43,121			9.7	%
Financing fees		30,779			5.8			30,046			6.2			733			2.4
Other revenues		8,037			1.5			9,497			1.9			(1,460	)		(15.4	)

Total revenues		528,293			100.0			485,899			100.0			42,394			8.7

Operating expenses:
Cost of services		323,131			61.2			293,725			60.4			29,406			10.0
Selling, general, and administrative expense		123,403			23.3			109,064			22.5			14,339			13.1
Depreciation and amortization expense		3,164			0.6			2,389			0.5			775			32.4

Total operating expenses		449,698			85.1			405,178			83.4			44,520			11.0

Operating income		78,595			14.9			80,721			16.6			(2,126	)		(2.6	)
Other income (expense), net		1,567			0.3			23			—			1,544			na
Interest expense		(1,155	)		(0.2	)		(1,349	)		(0.3	)		194			(14.4	)

Income before provision for income taxes		79,007			15.0			79,395			16.3			(388	)		(0.5	)
Provision for income taxes		31,524			6.0			32,994			6.8			(1,470	)		(4.5	)

Net income	$	47,483			9.0	%	$	46,401			9.5	%	$	1,082			2.3	%

Adjusted EBITDA⁽¹⁾	$	87,014			16.5	%	$	88,886			18.3	%	$	(1,872	)		(2.1	)%

Earnings per share:
Basic	$	1.22					$	1.19
Diluted	$	1.22					$	1.19
Weighted average common shares outstanding:
Basic		38,916						38,868
Diluted		39,034						39,051


Change in Interest Rates	Approximate Change in Fair Value of Investments
2% Decrease	$	3,903
1% Decrease	$	2,465
1% Increase	$	(2,749	)
2% Increase	$	(5,501	)


			~~Marcus & Millichap, Inc~~.

~~Date:~~	~~November 7, 2016~~	~~By:~~	~~/s/ Hessam Nadji~~
			~~Hessam Nadji~~ ~~President and Chief Executive Officer~~ ~~(Principal Executive Officer)~~

~~Date:~~	~~November 7, 2016~~	~~By:~~	~~/s/ Martin E. Louie~~
			~~Martin E. Louie~~ ~~Chief Financial Officer~~ ~~(Principal Financial Officer)~~


Exhibit No.		Description

10.23*		~~Second Amendment to Credit Agreement and Amended and Restated Revolving Line of Credit Note, between the Company and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association dated as of August 10, 2016~~

31.1*		Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule13a-14(a) under the Exchange Act, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

31.2*		Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule13a-14(a) under the Exchange Act, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

32.1*		Certifications of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule13a-14(b) under the Exchange Act and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

101.INS*		XBRL Instance Document

101.SCH*		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document

101.CAL*		XBRL Taxonomy Calculation Linkbase Document

101.DEF*		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Document

101.LAB*		XBRL Taxonomy Label Linkbase Document

101.PRE*		XBRL Taxonomy Presentation Linkbase Document


			Marcus & Millichap, Inc.

Date:	November 9, 2017	By:	/s/ Hessam Nadji
			Hessam Nadji President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)

Date:	November 9, 2017	By:	/s/ Martin E. Louie
			Martin E. Louie Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)

Large accelerated filer

Accelerated filer

Non-accelerated filer

¨☐ (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Smaller reporting company

Emerging growth company