UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM10-Q
☒ | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended March 31, 20172018
☐ | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission File Number1-15817
OLD NATIONAL BANCORP
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
INDIANA | 35-1539838 | |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) | (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) | |
One Main Street Evansville, Indiana | 47708 | |
(Address of principal executive offices) | (Zip Code) |
(812)464-1294(800) 731-2265
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to the filing requirements for at least the past 90 days. Yes ☒ No ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of RegulationS-T (s232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes ☒ No ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, anon-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” andfiler,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer | ☒ | Accelerated filer | ☐ | |||
Non-accelerated filer | ☐ (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) | Smaller reporting company | ☐ | |||
Emerging growth company | ☐ |
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule12b-2 of the Act). Yes ☐ No ☒
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock. The registrant has one class of common stock (no par value) with 135,435,000152,172,000 shares outstanding at March 31, 2017.2018.
OLD NATIONAL BANCORP
FORM10-Q
GLOSSARY OF ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS
As used in this report, references to “Old National,” “we,” “our,” “us,” and similar terms refer to the consolidated entity consisting of Old National Bancorp and its wholly-owned affiliates. Old National Bancorp refers solely to the parent holding company, and Old National Bank refers to Old National’s bank subsidiary.
The acronyms and abbreviations identified below are used in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited) as well as in the Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations. You may find it helpful to refer to this page as you read this report.
Anchor (MN): Anchor Bancorp, Inc.
Anchor Bank (MN): Anchor Bank, N.A.
Anchor (WI): Anchor BanCorp Wisconsin Inc.
AnchorBank (WI): AnchorBank, fsb
AOCI: accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)
AQR: asset quality rating
ASC: Accounting Standards Codification
ASU: Accounting Standards Update
ATM: automated teller machine
Common Stock: Old National Bancorp common stock, without par value
CReED: Indiana Community Revitalization Enhancement District Tax Credit
DTI: debt-to-income
Dodd-Frank Act: Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act
EITF: Emerging Issues Task Force
FASB: Financial Accounting Standards Board
FDIC: Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
FHLB: Federal Home Loan Bank
FHTC: Federal Historic Tax Credit
FICO: Fair Isaac Corporation
GAAP: generally accepted accounting principles in the United States
LGD: loss given default
LIBOR: London Interbank Offered Rate
LIHTC: Low Income Housing Tax Credit
LTV: loan-to-value
N/A: not applicable
N/M: not meaningful
NASDAQ: The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC
NOW: negotiable order of withdrawal
OTTI: other-than-temporary impairment
PCI: purchased credit impaired
PD: probability of default
Renewable Energy: investment tax credits for solar projects
SAB: Staff Accounting Bulletin
SEC: Securities and Exchange Commission
TBA: to be announced
TDR: troubled debt restructuring
OLD NATIONAL BANCORP
March 31, | December 31, | March 31, | March 31, | December 31, | March 31, | |||||||||||||||||||
(dollars and shares in thousands, except per share data) | 2017 | 2016 | 2016 | 2018 | 2017 | 2017 | ||||||||||||||||||
(unaudited) | (unaudited) | (unaudited) | (unaudited) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Assets | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash and due from banks | $ | 184,974 | $ | 209,381 | $ | 153,259 | $ | 192,022 | $ | 222,753 | $ | 184,974 | ||||||||||||
Money market and other interest-earning investments | 32,061 | 46,138 | 22,299 | 86,219 | 67,679 | 32,061 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||
Total cash and cash equivalents | 217,035 | 255,519 | 175,558 | 278,241 | 290,432 | 217,035 | ||||||||||||||||||
Trading securities, at fair value | 5,083 | 4,982 | 3,699 | 5,569 | 5,584 | 5,083 | ||||||||||||||||||
Investment securities -available-for-sale, at fair value: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
U.S. Treasury | 12,117 | 7,103 | 12,243 | 9,295 | 5,551 | 12,117 | ||||||||||||||||||
U.S. government-sponsored entities and agencies | 543,034 | 493,956 | 603,457 | 572,689 | 664,286 | 543,034 | ||||||||||||||||||
Mortgage-backed securities | 1,474,995 | 1,525,019 | 990,984 | 1,477,896 | 1,667,682 | 1,474,995 | ||||||||||||||||||
States and political subdivisions | 452,551 | 436,684 | 400,236 | 843,488 | 530,193 | 452,551 | ||||||||||||||||||
Other securities | 334,246 | 334,412 | 341,523 | 316,495 | 328,495 | 334,246 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||
Total investment securities -available-for-sale | 2,816,943 | 2,797,174 | 2,348,443 | 3,219,863 | 3,196,207 | 2,816,943 | ||||||||||||||||||
Investment securities -held-to-maturity, at amortized cost | 741,448 | 745,090 | 869,012 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Investment securities - held-to-maturity, at amortized cost (fair value $536,143; $727,703; and $784,906, respectively) | 535,153 | 684,063 | 741,448 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Federal Home Loan Bank/Federal Reserve Bank stock, at cost | 107,501 | 101,716 | 86,146 | 136,206 | 119,686 | 107,501 | ||||||||||||||||||
Loans held for sale, at fair value | 17,373 | 90,682 | 22,546 | 17,635 | 17,930 | 17,373 | ||||||||||||||||||
Loans: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial | 1,910,536 | 1,917,099 | 1,792,988 | 2,811,629 | 2,717,269 | 1,910,536 | ||||||||||||||||||
Commercial real estate | 3,222,865 | 3,130,853 | 1,922,754 | 4,449,980 | 4,354,552 | 3,222,865 | ||||||||||||||||||
Residential real estate | 2,112,262 | 2,087,530 | 1,649,996 | 2,158,532 | 2,167,053 | 2,112,262 | ||||||||||||||||||
Consumer credit, net of unearned income | 1,886,110 | 1,875,030 | 1,641,336 | 1,818,541 | 1,879,247 | 1,886,110 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||
Total loans | 9,131,773 | 9,010,512 | 7,007,074 | 11,238,682 | 11,118,121 | 9,131,773 | ||||||||||||||||||
Allowance for loan losses | (49,834 | ) | (49,808 | ) | (50,700 | ) | (50,381 | ) | (50,381 | ) | (49,834 | ) | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||
Net loans | 9,081,939 | 8,960,704 | 6,956,374 | 11,188,301 | 11,067,740 | 9,081,939 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||
FDIC indemnification asset | — | — | 7,703 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Premises and equipment, net | 420,866 | 429,622 | 198,065 | 453,603 | 458,074 | 420,866 | ||||||||||||||||||
Accrued interest receivable | 76,674 | 81,381 | 68,641 | 81,621 | 87,102 | 76,674 | ||||||||||||||||||
Goodwill | 655,018 | 655,018 | 584,634 | 828,804 | 828,051 | 655,018 | ||||||||||||||||||
Other intangible assets | 34,657 | 37,677 | 32,443 | 48,833 | 53,096 | 34,657 | ||||||||||||||||||
Company-owned life insurance | 353,786 | 352,956 | 342,292 | 404,561 | 403,753 | 353,786 | ||||||||||||||||||
Net deferred tax assets | 165,376 | 181,863 | 98,712 | 88,773 | 110,857 | 165,376 | ||||||||||||||||||
Loan servicing rights | 25,446 | 25,561 | 10,534 | 24,380 | 24,661 | 25,446 | ||||||||||||||||||
Assets held for sale | 14,604 | 5,970 | 2,038 | 6,331 | 7,180 | 14,604 | ||||||||||||||||||
Other real estate owned and repossessed personal property | 12,547 | 18,546 | 13,522 | 6,735 | 8,810 | 12,547 | ||||||||||||||||||
Other assets | 123,349 | 115,776 | 111,964 | 171,678 | 155,066 | 123,349 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||
Total assets | $ | 14,869,645 | $ | 14,860,237 | $ | 11,932,326 | $ | 17,496,287 | $ | 17,518,292 | $ | 14,869,645 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||
Liabilities | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Deposits: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Noninterest-bearing demand | $ | 3,024,111 | $ | 3,016,093 | $ | 2,491,767 | $ | 3,655,732 | $ | 3,680,807 | $ | 3,024,111 | ||||||||||||
Interest-bearing: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
NOW | 2,635,317 | 2,596,595 | 2,178,690 | 3,135,778 | 3,115,822 | 2,635,317 | ||||||||||||||||||
Savings | 2,997,919 | 2,954,709 | 2,271,341 | 3,091,101 | 3,035,622 | 2,997,919 | ||||||||||||||||||
Money market | 697,287 | 707,748 | 561,250 | 1,130,258 | 1,139,077 | 697,287 | ||||||||||||||||||
Time | 1,466,718 | 1,468,108 | 1,085,847 | 1,775,731 | 1,634,436 | 1,466,718 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||
Total deposits | 10,821,352 | 10,743,253 | 8,588,895 | 12,788,600 | 12,605,764 | 10,821,352 | ||||||||||||||||||
Federal funds purchased and interbank borrowings | 61,016 | 213,003 | 165,320 | 150,026 | 335,033 | 61,016 | ||||||||||||||||||
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase | 345,550 | 367,052 | 379,060 | �� | 308,189 | 384,810 | 345,550 | |||||||||||||||||
Federal Home Loan Bank advances | 1,441,030 | 1,353,092 | 899,418 | 1,664,179 | 1,609,579 | 1,441,030 | ||||||||||||||||||
Other borrowings | 219,021 | 218,939 | 218,393 | 248,898 | 248,782 | 219,021 | ||||||||||||||||||
Accrued expenses and other liabilities | 135,317 | 150,481 | 172,597 | 157,277 | 179,927 | 135,317 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||
Total liabilities | 13,023,286 | 13,045,820 | 10,423,683 | 15,317,169 | 15,363,895 | 13,023,286 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||
Shareholders’ Equity | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Preferred stock, 2,000 shares authorized, no shares issued or outstanding | — | — | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||
Common stock, $1.00 per share stated value, 300,000 shares authorized, | 135,435 | 135,159 | 114,352 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Common stock, $1.00 per share stated value, 300,000 shares authorized, 152,172; 152,040; and 135,435 shares issued and outstanding, respectively | 152,172 | 152,040 | 135,435 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Capital surplus | 1,350,866 | 1,348,338 | 1,088,037 | 1,640,776 | 1,639,499 | 1,350,866 | ||||||||||||||||||
Retained earnings | 408,623 | 390,292 | 335,839 | 447,696 | 413,130 | 408,623 | ||||||||||||||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax | (48,565 | ) | (59,372 | ) | (29,585 | ) | (61,526 | ) | (50,272 | ) | (48,565 | ) | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||
Total shareholders’ equity | 1,846,359 | 1,814,417 | 1,508,643 | 2,179,118 | 2,154,397 | 1,846,359 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity | $ | 14,869,645 | $ | 14,860,237 | $ | 11,932,326 | $ | 17,496,287 | $ | 17,518,292 | $ | 14,869,645 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements are an integral part of these statements.
OLD NATIONAL BANCORP
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME (unaudited)
Three Months Ended | ||||||||
March 31, | ||||||||
(dollars and shares in thousands, except per share data) | 2018 | 2017 | ||||||
Interest Income | ||||||||
Loans including fees: | ||||||||
Taxable | $ | 118,389 | $ | 92,201 | ||||
Nontaxable | 3,874 | 3,179 | ||||||
Investment securities: | ||||||||
Taxable | 18,804 | 15,685 | ||||||
Nontaxable | 6,549 | 7,372 | ||||||
Money market and other interest-earning investments | 90 | 31 | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Total interest income | 147,706 | 118,468 | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Interest Expense | ||||||||
Deposits | 7,255 | 4,383 | ||||||
Federal funds purchased and interbank borrowings | 1,017 | 356 | ||||||
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase | 359 | 256 | ||||||
Federal Home Loan Bank advances | 7,780 | 5,312 | ||||||
Other borrowings | 2,723 | 2,360 | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Total interest expense | 19,134 | 12,667 | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Net interest income | 128,572 | 105,801 | ||||||
Provision for loan losses | 380 | 347 | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Net interest income after provision for loan losses | 128,192 | 105,454 | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Noninterest Income | ||||||||
Wealth management fees | 9,026 | 8,999 | ||||||
Service charges on deposit accounts | 10,759 | 9,843 | ||||||
Debit card and ATM fees | 4,865 | 4,236 | ||||||
Mortgage banking revenue | 4,192 | 4,226 | ||||||
Investment product fees | 5,515 | 4,989 | ||||||
Capital markets income | 498 | 1,031 | ||||||
Company-owned life insurance | 2,605 | 2,149 | ||||||
Net securities gains (losses) | 788 | 1,500 | ||||||
Recognition of deferred gain on sale leaseback transactions | 395 | 537 | ||||||
Other income | 3,746 | 5,410 | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Total noninterest income | 42,389 | 42,920 | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Noninterest Expense | ||||||||
Salaries and employee benefits | 64,179 | 56,564 | ||||||
Occupancy | 13,280 | 12,134 | ||||||
Equipment | 3,565 | 3,227 | ||||||
Marketing | 3,697 | 3,050 | ||||||
Data processing | 8,884 | 7,608 | ||||||
Communication | 3,064 | 2,414 | ||||||
Professional fees | 2,730 | 2,651 | ||||||
Loan expense | 1,744 | 1,631 | ||||||
Supplies | 722 | 579 | ||||||
FDIC assessment | 2,645 | 2,487 | ||||||
Other real estate owned expense | 349 | 1,115 | ||||||
Amortization of intangibles | 3,609 | 3,020 | ||||||
Amortization of tax credit investments | 716 | — | ||||||
Other expense | 8,457 | 5,411 | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Total noninterest expense | 117,641 | 101,891 | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Income before income taxes | 52,940 | 46,483 | ||||||
Income tax expense | 4,957 | 10,491 | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Net income | $ | 47,983 | $ | 35,992 | ||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Net income per common share - basic | $ | 0.32 | $ | 0.27 | ||||
Net income per common share - diluted | 0.31 | 0.27 | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding - basic | 151,721 | 134,912 | ||||||
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding - diluted | 152,370 | 135,431 | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Dividends per common share | $ | 0.13 | $ | 0.13 |
The accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements are an integral part of these statements.
OLD NATIONAL BANCORP
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (unaudited)
Three Months Ended | ||||||||
March 31, | ||||||||
(dollars and shares in thousands, except per share data) | 2017 | 2016 | ||||||
Interest Income | ||||||||
Loans including fees: | ||||||||
Taxable | $ | 92,201 | $ | 71,572 | ||||
Nontaxable | 3,179 | 3,004 | ||||||
Investment securities: | ||||||||
Taxable | 15,685 | 13,722 | ||||||
Nontaxable | 7,372 | 6,982 | ||||||
Money market and other interest-earning investments | 31 | 49 | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Total interest income | 118,468 | 95,329 | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Interest Expense | ||||||||
Deposits | 4,383 | 3,493 | ||||||
Federal funds purchased and interbank borrowings | 356 | 123 | ||||||
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase | 256 | 373 | ||||||
Federal Home Loan Bank advances | 5,312 | 3,417 | ||||||
Other borrowings | 2,360 | 2,280 | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Total interest expense | 12,667 | 9,686 | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Net interest income | 105,801 | 85,643 | ||||||
Provision for loan losses | 347 | 91 | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Net interest income after provision for loan losses | 105,454 | 85,552 | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Noninterest Income | ||||||||
Wealth management fees | 8,999 | 8,121 | ||||||
Service charges on deposit accounts | 9,843 | 9,639 | ||||||
Debit card and ATM fees | 4,236 | 3,785 | ||||||
Mortgage banking revenue | 4,226 | 2,920 | ||||||
Insurance premiums and commissions | 107 | 13,121 | ||||||
Investment product fees | 4,989 | 3,905 | ||||||
Company-owned life insurance | 2,149 | 2,038 | ||||||
Net securities gains (losses) | 1,500 | 1,106 | ||||||
Recognition of deferred gain on sale leaseback transactions | 537 | 1,052 | ||||||
Change in FDIC indemnification asset | — | (655 | ) | |||||
Other income | 6,334 | 4,419 | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Total noninterest income | 42,920 | 49,451 | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Noninterest Expense | ||||||||
Salaries and employee benefits | 56,564 | 56,972 | ||||||
Occupancy | 12,134 | 12,844 | ||||||
Equipment | 3,227 | 2,893 | ||||||
Marketing | 3,050 | 2,486 | ||||||
Data processing | 7,608 | 7,123 | ||||||
Communication | 2,414 | 1,864 | ||||||
Professional fees | 2,651 | 3,368 | ||||||
Loan expense | 1,631 | 1,333 | ||||||
Supplies | 579 | 583 | ||||||
FDIC assessment | 2,487 | 1,919 | ||||||
Other real estate owned expense | 1,115 | 424 | ||||||
Amortization of intangibles | 3,020 | 2,647 | ||||||
Other expense | 5,411 | 3,899 | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Total noninterest expense | 101,891 | 98,355 | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Income before income taxes | 46,483 | 36,648 | ||||||
Income tax expense | 10,491 | 9,671 | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Net income | $ | 35,992 | $ | 26,977 | ||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Net income per common share - basic | $ | 0.27 | $ | 0.24 | ||||
Net income per common share - diluted | 0.27 | 0.24 | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding - basic | 134,912 | 113,998 | ||||||
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding - diluted | 135,431 | 114,563 | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Dividends per common share | $ | 0.13 | $ | 0.13 |
Three Months Ended | ||||||||
March 31, | ||||||||
(dollars in thousands) | 2018 | 2017 | ||||||
Net income | $ | 47,983 | $ | 35,992 | ||||
Other comprehensive income (loss): | ||||||||
Change in securities available-for-sale: | ||||||||
Unrealized holding gains (losses) for the period | (25,794 | ) | 15,780 | |||||
Reclassification for securities transferred to held-to-maturity | 14,007 | — | ||||||
Reclassification adjustment for securities gains realized in income | (788 | ) | (1,500 | ) | ||||
Income tax effect | 3,110 | (5,260 | ) | |||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Unrealized gains (losses) on available-for-sale securities | (9,465 | ) | 9,020 | |||||
Change in securities held-to-maturity: | ||||||||
Adjustment for securities transferred to available-for-sale | 19,412 | — | ||||||
Adjustment for securities transferred from available-for-sale | (14,007 | ) | — | |||||
Amortization of fair value for securities held-to-maturity previously recognized into accumulated other comprehensive income | 591 | 449 | ||||||
Income tax effect | (1,026 | ) | (154 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Changes from securities held-to-maturity | 4,970 | 295 | ||||||
Cash flow hedges: | ||||||||
Net unrealized derivative gains (losses) on cash flow hedges | 4,563 | 580 | ||||||
Reclassification adjustment for losses realized in net income | 769 | 1,799 | ||||||
Income tax effect | (1,308 | ) | (904 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Changes from cash flow hedges | 4,024 | 1,475 | ||||||
Defined benefit pension plans: | ||||||||
Amortization of net loss recognized in income | 51 | 27 | ||||||
Income tax effect | (31 | ) | (10 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Changes from defined benefit pension plans | 20 | 17 | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax | (451 | ) | 10,807 | |||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Comprehensive income | $ | 47,532 | $ | 46,799 | ||||
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements are an integral part of these statements.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOMECHANGES IN SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY (unaudited)
Three Months Ended | ||||||||
March 31, | ||||||||
(dollars in thousands) | 2017 | 2016 | ||||||
Net income | $ | 35,992 | $ | 26,977 | ||||
Other comprehensive income (loss): | ||||||||
Change in securitiesavailable-for-sale: | ||||||||
Unrealized holding gains (losses) for the period | 15,780 | 17,857 | ||||||
Reclassification adjustment for securities gains realized in income | (1,500 | ) | (1,106 | ) | ||||
Income tax effect | (5,260 | ) | (6,168 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Unrealized gains (losses) onavailable-for-sale securities | 9,020 | 10,583 | ||||||
Change in securitiesheld-to-maturity: | ||||||||
Amortization of fair value for securitiesheld-to-maturity previously recognized into accumulated other comprehensive income | 449 | 465 | ||||||
Income tax effect | (154 | ) | (159 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Changes from securitiesheld-to-maturity | 295 | 306 | ||||||
Cash flow hedges: | ||||||||
Net unrealized derivative gains (losses) on cash flow hedges | 580 | (11,130 | ) | |||||
Reclassification adjustment for losses realized in net income | 1,799 | 1,273 | ||||||
Income tax effect | (904 | ) | 3,746 | |||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Changes from cash flow hedges | 1,475 | (6,111 | ) | |||||
Defined benefit pension plans: | ||||||||
Amortization of net loss recognized in income | 27 | 700 | ||||||
Income tax effect | (10 | ) | (266 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Changes from defined benefit pension plans | 17 | 434 | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax | 10,807 | 5,212 | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Comprehensive income | $ | 46,799 | $ | 32,189 | ||||
|
|
|
|
Accumulated | ||||||||||||||||||||
Other | Total | |||||||||||||||||||
Common | Capital | Retained | Comprehensive | Shareholders’ | ||||||||||||||||
(dollars in thousands) | Stock | Surplus | Earnings | Income (Loss) | Equity | |||||||||||||||
Balance at December 31, 2016 | $ | 135,159 | $ | 1,348,338 | $ | 390,292 | $ | (59,372 | ) | $ | 1,814,417 | |||||||||
Net income | — | — | 35,992 | — | 35,992 | |||||||||||||||
Other comprehensive income (loss) | — | — | — | 10,807 | 10,807 | |||||||||||||||
Dividends - common stock ($0.13 per share) | — | — | (17,602 | ) | — | (17,602 | ) | |||||||||||||
Common stock issued | 5 | 86 | — | — | 91 | |||||||||||||||
Common stock repurchased | (70 | ) | (1,197 | ) | — | — | (1,267 | ) | ||||||||||||
Stock-based compensation expense | — | 1,331 | ��� | — | 1,331 | |||||||||||||||
Stock activity under incentive compensation plans | 341 | 2,308 | (59 | ) | — | 2,590 | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
Balance at March 31, 2017 | $ | 135,435 | $ | 1,350,866 | $ | 408,623 | $ | (48,565 | ) | $ | 1,846,359 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
Balance at December 31, 2017 | $ | 152,040 | $ | 1,639,499 | $ | 413,130 | $ | (50,272 | ) | $ | 2,154,397 | |||||||||
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principles (Note 3) | — | — | (4,127 | ) | (52 | ) | (4,179 | ) | ||||||||||||
Reclassification of certain tax effects related to the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 (Note 3) | — | — | 10,751 | (10,751 | ) | — | ||||||||||||||
Net income | — | — | 47,983 | — | 47,983 | |||||||||||||||
Other comprehensive income (loss) | — | — | — | (451 | ) | (451 | ) | |||||||||||||
Dividends - common stock ($0.13 per share) | — | — | (19,782 | ) | — | (19,782 | ) | |||||||||||||
Common stock issued | 6 | 99 | — | — | 105 | |||||||||||||||
Common stock repurchased | (64 | ) | (1,051 | ) | — | — | (1,115 | ) | ||||||||||||
Stock-based compensation expense | — | 1,931 | — | — | 1,931 | |||||||||||||||
Stock activity under incentive compensation plans | 190 | 298 | (259 | ) | — | 229 | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
Balance at March 31, 2018 | $ | 152,172 | $ | 1,640,776 | $ | 447,696 | $ | (61,526 | ) | $ | 2,179,118 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements are an integral part of these statements.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITYCASH FLOWS (unaudited)
Accumulated | ||||||||||||||||||||
Other | Total | |||||||||||||||||||
Common | Capital | Retained | Comprehensive | Shareholders’ | ||||||||||||||||
(dollars in thousands) | Stock | Surplus | Earnings | Income (Loss) | Equity | |||||||||||||||
Balance at December 31, 2015 | $ | 114,297 | $ | 1,087,911 | $ | 323,759 | $ | (34,797 | ) | $ | 1,491,170 | |||||||||
Net income | — | — | 26,977 | — | 26,977 | |||||||||||||||
Other comprehensive income | — | — | — | 5,212 | 5,212 | |||||||||||||||
Dividends - common stock | — | — | (14,865 | ) | — | (14,865 | ) | |||||||||||||
Common stock issued | 8 | 96 | — | — | 104 | |||||||||||||||
Common stock repurchased | (41 | ) | (451 | ) | — | — | (492 | ) | ||||||||||||
Stock-based compensation expense | — | 1,268 | — | — | 1,268 | |||||||||||||||
Stock activity under incentive compensation plans | 88 | (787 | ) | (32 | ) | — | (731 | ) | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
Balance at March 31, 2016 | $ | 114,352 | $ | 1,088,037 | $ | 335,839 | $ | (29,585 | ) | $ | 1,508,643 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
Balance at December 31, 2016 | $ | 135,159 | $ | 1,348,338 | $ | 390,292 | $ | (59,372 | ) | $ | 1,814,417 | |||||||||
Net income | — | — | 35,992 | — | 35,992 | |||||||||||||||
Other comprehensive income | — | — | — | 10,807 | 10,807 | |||||||||||||||
Dividends - common stock | — | — | (17,602 | ) | — | (17,602 | ) | |||||||||||||
Common stock issued | 5 | 86 | — | — | 91 | |||||||||||||||
Common stock repurchased | (70 | ) | (1,197 | ) | — | — | (1,267 | ) | ||||||||||||
Stock-based compensation expense | — | 1,331 | — | — | 1,331 | |||||||||||||||
Stock activity under incentive compensation plans | 341 | 2,308 | (59 | ) | — | 2,590 | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
Balance at March 31, 2017 | $ | 135,435 | $ | 1,350,866 | $ | 408,623 | $ | (48,565 | ) | $ | 1,846,359 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended | ||||||||
March 31, | ||||||||
(dollars in thousands) | 2018 | 2017 | ||||||
Cash Flows From Operating Activities | ||||||||
Net income | $ | 47,983 | $ | 35,992 | ||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Adjustments to reconcile net income to cash provided by operating activities: | ||||||||
Depreciation | 5,833 | 5,211 | ||||||
Amortization of other intangible assets | 3,609 | 3,020 | ||||||
Amortization of tax credit investments | 716 | — | ||||||
Net premium amortization on investment securities | 3,845 | 3,846 | ||||||
Stock-based compensation expense | 1,931 | 1,331 | ||||||
Excess tax (benefit) expense on stock-based compensation | 536 | 288 | ||||||
Provision for loan losses | 380 | 347 | ||||||
Net securities (gains) losses | (788 | ) | (1,500 | ) | ||||
Recognition of deferred gain on sale leaseback transactions | (395 | ) | (537 | ) | ||||
Net (gains) losses on sales of loans and other assets | 5,365 | (2,520 | ) | |||||
Increase in cash surrender value of company-owned life insurance | (2,605 | ) | (2,149 | ) | ||||
Residential real estate loans originated for sale | (92,377 | ) | (51,823 | ) | ||||
Proceeds from sales of residential real estate loans | 93,686 | 127,656 | ||||||
(Increase) decrease in interest receivable | 5,481 | 4,706 | ||||||
(Increase) decrease in other real estate owned | 2,075 | 5,999 | ||||||
(Increase) decrease in other assets | 9,211 | 2,548 | ||||||
Increase (decrease) in accrued expenses and other liabilities | (22,172 | ) | (12,451 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Total adjustments | 14,331 | 83,972 | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Net cash flows provided by (used in) operating activities | 62,314 | 119,964 | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Cash Flows From Investing Activities | ||||||||
Purchases of investment securities available-for-sale | (113,525 | ) | (133,288 | ) | ||||
Purchases of Federal Home Loan Bank/Federal Reserve Bank stock | (16,520 | ) | (5,794 | ) | ||||
Proceeds from maturities, prepayments, and calls of investment securities available-for-sale | 118,694 | 93,040 | ||||||
Proceeds from sales of investment securities available-for-sale | 84,257 | 33,588 | ||||||
Proceeds from maturities, prepayments, and calls of investment securities held-to-maturity | 26,117 | 2,714 | ||||||
Proceeds from sales of Federal Home Loan Bank/Federal Reserve Bank stock | — | 9 | ||||||
Proceeds from sales of trading securities | 128 | 127 | ||||||
Net principal collected from (loans made to) loan customers | (120,941 | ) | (121,582 | ) | ||||
Proceeds from settlements on company-owned life insurance | 1,797 | 1,319 | ||||||
Proceeds from sales of premises and equipment and other assets | 2,578 | — | ||||||
Purchases of premises and equipment and other assets | (9,593 | ) | (5,093 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Net cash flows provided by (used in) investing activities | (27,008 | ) | (134,960 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Cash Flows From Financing Activities | ||||||||
Net increase (decrease) in: | ||||||||
Deposits | 182,697 | 78,099 | ||||||
Federal funds purchased and interbank borrowings | (185,007 | ) | (151,987 | ) | ||||
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase | (76,621 | ) | (21,502 | ) | ||||
Payments for maturities of Federal Home Loan Bank advances | (772,928 | ) | (641,830 | ) | ||||
Payments for maturities of other borrowings | (32 | ) | (80 | ) | ||||
Proceeds from Federal Home Loan Bank advances | 825,000 | 730,000 | ||||||
Cash dividends paid on common stock | (19,782 | ) | (17,602 | ) | ||||
Common stock repurchased | (1,115 | ) | (1,267 | ) | ||||
Proceeds from exercise of stock options | 186 | 2,590 | ||||||
Common stock issued | 105 | 91 | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Net cash flows provided by (used in) financing activities | (47,497 | ) | (23,488 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents | (12,191 | ) | (38,484 | ) | ||||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period | 290,432 | 255,519 | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period | $ | 278,241 | $ | 217,035 | ||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Supplemental cash flow information: | ||||||||
Total interest paid | $ | 20,775 | $ | 14,642 | ||||
Total taxes paid (net of refunds) | $ | (183 | ) | $ | — | |||
Securities transferred from held-to-maturity to available-for-sale | $ | 447,026 | $ | — | ||||
Securities transferred from available-for-sale to held-to-maturity | $ | 323,990 | $ | — |
The accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements are an integral part of these statements.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (unaudited)
Three Months Ended | ||||||||
March 31, | ||||||||
(dollars in thousands) | 2017 | 2016 | ||||||
Cash Flows From Operating Activities | ||||||||
Net income | $ | 35,992 | $ | 26,977 | ||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Adjustments to reconcile net income to cash provided by operating activities: | ||||||||
Depreciation | 5,211 | 3,527 | ||||||
Amortization of other intangible assets | 3,020 | 2,647 | ||||||
Net premium amortization on investment securities | 3,846 | 4,412 | ||||||
Amortization of FDIC indemnification asset | — | 655 | ||||||
Stock-based compensation expense | 1,331 | 1,268 | ||||||
Excess tax (benefit) expense on stock-based compensation | 288 | — | ||||||
Provision for loan losses | 347 | 91 | ||||||
Net securities (gains) losses | (1,500 | ) | (1,106 | ) | ||||
Recognition of deferred gain on sale leaseback transactions | (537 | ) | (1,052 | ) | ||||
Net gains on sales of loans and other assets | (2,520 | ) | (792 | ) | ||||
Increase in cash surrender value of company-owned life insurance | (2,149 | ) | (2,038 | ) | ||||
Residential real estate loans originated for sale | (51,823 | ) | (70,754 | ) | ||||
Proceeds from sale of residential real estate loans | 127,656 | 62,795 | ||||||
(Increase) decrease in interest receivable | 4,706 | 457 | ||||||
(Increase) decrease in other real estate owned | 5,999 | (1,024 | ) | |||||
(Increase) decrease in other assets | 2,548 | 3,460 | ||||||
Increase (decrease) in accrued expenses and other liabilities | (12,451 | ) | (14,802 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Total adjustments | 83,972 | (12,256 | ) | |||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Net cash flows provided by (used in) operating activities | 119,964 | 14,721 | ||||||
�� |
|
|
|
| ||||
Cash Flows From Investing Activities | ||||||||
Purchases of investment securitiesavailable-for-sale | (133,288 | ) | (289,184 | ) | ||||
Purchases of Federal Home Loan Bank/Federal Reserve Bank stock | (5,794 | ) | — | |||||
Proceeds from maturities, prepayments, and calls of investment securitiesavailable-for-sale | 93,040 | 298,147 | ||||||
Proceeds from sales of investment securitiesavailable-for-sale | 33,588 | 76,650 | ||||||
Proceeds from maturities, prepayments, and calls of investment securitiesheld-to-maturity | 2,714 | 1,439 | ||||||
Proceeds from redemption of Federal Home Loan Bank/Federal Reserve Bank stock | 9 | — | ||||||
Proceeds from sales of trading securities | 127 | — | ||||||
Reimbursements under FDIC loss share agreements | — | 877 | ||||||
Net principal collected from (loans made to) loan customers | (121,582 | ) | (60,293 | ) | ||||
Proceeds from settlements on company-owned life insurance | 1,319 | 1,040 | ||||||
Proceeds from sale of premises and equipment and other assets | — | 3,656 | ||||||
Purchases of premises and equipment and other assets | (5,093 | ) | (4,928 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Net cash flows provided by (used in) investing activities | (134,960 | ) | 27,404 | |||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Cash Flows From Financing Activities | ||||||||
Net increase (decrease) in: | ||||||||
Deposits | 78,099 | 188,035 | ||||||
Federal funds purchased and interbank borrowings | (151,987 | ) | (125,770 | ) | ||||
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase | (21,502 | ) | (8,349 | ) | ||||
Payments for maturities on Federal Home Loan Bank advances | (641,830 | ) | (475,121 | ) | ||||
Payments for maturities on other borrowings | (80 | ) | (17 | ) | ||||
Proceeds from Federal Home Loan Bank advances | 730,000 | 350,000 | ||||||
Cash dividends paid on common stock | (17,602 | ) | (14,865 | ) | ||||
Common stock repurchased | (1,267 | ) | (492 | ) | ||||
Proceeds from exercise of stock options | 2,590 | 90 | ||||||
Common stock issued | 91 | 104 | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Net cash flows provided by (used in) financing activities | (23,488 | ) | (86,385 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents | (38,484 | ) | (44,260 | ) | ||||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period | 255,519 | 219,818 | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period | $ | 217,035 | $ | 175,558 | ||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Supplemental cash flow information: | ||||||||
Total interest paid | $ | 14,642 | $ | 11,265 | ||||
Total taxes paid (net of refunds) | $ | — | $ | 2,000 |
The accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements are an integral part of these statements.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited)
NOTE 1 - BASIS OF PRESENTATION
The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Old National Bancorp and its wholly-owned affiliates (hereinafter collectively referred to as “Old National”) and have been prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and prevailing practices within the banking industry. Such principles require management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, and the disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. In the opinion of management, the consolidated financial statements contain all the normal and recurring adjustments necessary for a fair statement of the financial position of Old National as of March 31, 20172018 and 2016,2017, and December 31, 2016,2017, and the results of its operations for the three months ended March 31, 20172018 and 2016.2017. Interim results do not necessarily represent annual results. These financial statements should be read in conjunction with Old National’s Annual Report for the year ended December 31, 2016.2017.
All significant intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated. Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform to the 20172018 presentation. Such reclassifications had no effect on net income or shareholders’ equity and were insignificant amounts.
In May 2014, the FASB issued an update (ASU No. 2014-09,Revenue from Contracts with Customers) creating FASB Topic 606,Revenue from Contracts with Customers. The guidance in this update affects any entity that either enters into contracts with customers to transfer goods or services or enters into contracts for the transfer of nonfinancial assets unless those contracts are within the scope of other standards (for example, insurance contracts or lease contracts). The core principle of the guidance is that an entity should recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. The guidance provides steps to follow to achieve the core principle. An entity should disclose sufficient information to enable users of financial statements to understand the nature, amount, timing and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising from contracts with customers. The amendments in this update become effective for annual periods and interim periods within those annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017. We finalized our in-depth assessment and identified the revenue line items within the scope of this new guidance. Neither the new standard, nor any of the amendments detailed below, resulted in a material change from our current accounting for revenue because the majority of Old National’s financial instruments are not within the scope of Topic 606, and those that are require no change in the accounting.
In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-08,Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Principal versus Agent Considerations (Reporting Revenue Gross versus Net). The amendments relate to when another party, along with the entity, is involved in providing a good or service to a customer. Topic 606 requires an entity to determine whether the nature of its promise is to provide that good or service to the customer (that is, the entity is a principal) or to arrange for the good or service to be provided to the customer by the other party (that is, the entity is an agent). This determination is based upon whether the entity controls the good or the service before it is transferred to the customer. Topic 606 includes indicators to assist in this evaluation. The amendments in this update affect the guidance in ASU No. 2014-09 above. The effective date is the same as the effective date of ASU No. 2014-09.
In April 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-10,Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Identifying Performance Obligations and Licensing. The amendments clarify the following two aspects of Topic 606: identifying performance obligations, and the licensing implementation guidance. Before an entity can identify its performance obligations in a contract with a customer, the entity first identifies the promised goods or services in the contract. The amendments in this update are expected to reduce the cost and complexity of applying the guidance on identifying promised goods or services. To identify performance obligations in a contract, an entity evaluates whether promised goods and services are distinct. Topic 606 includes two criteria for assessing whether promises to transfer goods or services are distinct. One of those criteria is that the promises are separately identifiable. This update will improve the guidance on assessing that criterion. Topic 606 also includes
implementation guidance on determining whether as entity’s promise to grant a license provides a customer with either a right to use the entity’s intellectual property, which is satisfied at a point in time, or a right to access the entity’s intellectual property, which is satisfied over time. The amendments in this update are intended to improve the operability and understandability of the licensing implementation guidance. The amendments in this update affect the guidance in ASU No. 2014-09 above. The effective date is the same as the effective date of ASU No. 2014-09.
In May 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-12,Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Narrow-Scope Improvements and Practical Expedients. The amendments do not change the core revenue recognition principle in Topic 606. The amendments provide clarifying guidance in certain narrow areas and add some practical expedients.
In December 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-20,Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Technical Corrections and Improvements. The FASB board decided to issue a separate update for technical corrections and improvements to Topic 606 and other Topics amended by ASU No. 2014-09 to increase awareness of the proposals and to expedite improvements to ASU No. 2014-09. The amendment affects narrow aspects of the guidance issued in ASU No. 2014-09.
On January 1, 2018, we adopted ASU 2014-09,Revenue from Contracts with Customers and all subsequent amendments to the ASU (collectively, “Topic 606”). We elected to implement using the modified retrospective application, with the cumulative effect recorded as an adjustment to opening retained earnings at January 1, 2018. Due to immateriality, we had no cumulative effect to record. Since interest income on loans and securities are both excluded from this topic, a significant majority of our revenues are not subject to the new guidance. Our services that fall within the scope of Topic 606 are presented within noninterest income and are recognized as revenue as we satisfy our obligation to the customer. Services within the scope of Topic 606 include wealth management fees, service charges on deposit accounts, debit card and ATM fees, and investment product fees.
Wealth management fees: We earn wealth management fees based upon asset custody and investment management services provided to individual and institutional customers. Most of these customers receive monthly or quarterly billings for services rendered based upon the market value of assets in custody. Fees that are transaction based are recognized at the point in time that the transaction is executed.
Service charges on deposit accounts: We earn fees from our deposit customers for transaction-based, account maintenance, and overdraft services. Transaction-based fees and overdraft fees are recognized at a point in time, since the customer generally has a right to cancel the depository arrangement at any time. The arrangement is considered a day-to-day contract with ongoing renewals and optional purchases, so the duration of the contract does not extend beyond the services already performed. Account maintenance fees, which relate primarily to monthly maintenance, are earned over the course of a month, representing the period over which we satisfy our performance obligation.
Debit card and ATM fees: Debit card and ATM fees include ATM usage fees and debit card interchange income. As with the transaction-based fees on deposit accounts, the ATM fees are recognized at the point in time that we fulfill the customer’s request. We earn interchange fees from cardholder transactions processed through card association networks. Interchange rates are generally set by the card associations based upon purchase volumes and other factors. Interchange fees represent a percentage of the underlying transaction value and are recognized daily, concurrently with the transaction processing services provided to the cardholder.
Investment product fees: Investment product fees are the commissions and fees received from a registered broker/dealer and investment adviser that provide those services to our customers. We act as an agent in arranging the relationship between the customer and the third-party service provider. These fees are recognized monthly from the third-party broker based upon services already performed.
The consolidated statements of income include all categories of noninterest income. The following table reflects only the categories of noninterest income that are within the scope of Topic 606:
Three Months Ended | ||||||||
March 31, | ||||||||
(dollars in thousands) | 2018 | 2017 | ||||||
Wealth management fees | $ | 9,026 | $ | 8,999 | ||||
Service charges on deposit accounts | 10,759 | 9,843 | ||||||
Debit card and ATM fees | 4,865 | 4,236 | ||||||
Investment product fees | 5,515 | 4,989 | ||||||
Other income: | ||||||||
Gain (loss) on other real estate owned | 135 | 658 | ||||||
Merchant processing fees | 641 | 597 | ||||||
Safe deposit box fees | 404 | 307 | ||||||
Insurance premiums and commissions | 104 | 107 | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Total | $ | 31,449 | $ | 29,736 | ||||
|
|
|
|
The adoption of Topic 606 did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial position, results of operations, equity, or cash flows as of the adoption date or for the three months ended March 31, 2018.
NOTE 23 – RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
FASB ASC 606 –In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued an update (ASUNo. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers) creating FASB Topic 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers. The guidance in this update affects any entity that either enters into contracts with customers to transfer goods or services or enters into contracts for the transfer of nonfinancial assets unless those contracts are within the scope of other standards (for example, insurance contracts or lease contracts). The core principle of the guidance is that an entity should recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. The guidance provides steps to follow to achieve the core principle. An entity should disclose sufficient information to enable users of financial statements to understand the nature, amount, timing and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising from contracts with customers. The amendments in this update become effective for annual periods and interim periods within those annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017. We do not expect the new standard, or any of the amendments detailed below, to result in a material change from our current accounting for revenue because the majority of the Company’s financial instruments are not within the scope of Topic 606, but it will result in new disclosure requirements.
In March 2016, the FASB issued ASUNo. 2016-08, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Principal versus Agent Considerations (Reporting Revenue Gross versus Net). The amendments relate to when another party, along with the entity, is involved in providing a good or service to a customer. Topic 606 requires an entity to determine whether the nature of its promise is to provide that good or service to the customer (that is, the entity is a principal) or to arrange for the good or service to be provided to the customer by the other party (that is, the entity is an agent). This determination is based upon whether the entity controls the good or the service before it is transferred to the customer. Topic 606 includes indicators to assist in this evaluation. The amendments in this update affect the guidance in ASUNo. 2014-09 above, which is not yet effective. The effective date will be the same as the effective date of ASUNo. 2014-09.
In April 2016, the FASB issued ASUNo. 2016-10, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Identifying Performance Obligations and Licensing. The amendments clarify the following two aspects of Topic 606: identifying performance obligations, and the licensing implementation guidance. Before an entity can identify its performance obligations in a contract with a customer, the entity first identifies the promised goods or services in the contract. The amendments in this update are expected to reduce the cost and complexity of applying the guidance on identifying promised goods or services. To identify performance obligations in a contract, an entity evaluates whether promised goods and services are distinct. Topic 606 includes two criteria for assessing whether promises to transfer goods or services are distinct. One of those criteria is that the promises are separately identifiable. This update will improve the guidance on assessing that criterion. Topic 606 also includes
implementation guidance on determining whether as entity’s promise to grant a license provides a customer with either a right to use the entity’s intellectual property, which is satisfied at a point in time, or a right to access the entity’s intellectual property, which is satisfied over time. The amendments in this update are intended to improve the operability and understandability of the licensing implementation guidance. The amendments in this update affect the guidance in ASUNo. 2014-09 above, which is not yet effective. The effective date will be the same as the effective date of ASUNo. 2014-09.
In May 2016, the FASB issued ASUNo. 2016-12, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Narrow-Scope Improvements and Practical Expedients. The amendments do not change the core revenue recognition principle in Topic 606. The amendments provide clarifying guidance in certain narrow areas and add some practical expedients.
In December 2016, the FASB issued ASUNo. 2016-20, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Technical Corrections and Improvements. The FASB board decided to issue a separate update for technical corrections and improvements to Topic 606 and other Topics amended by ASUNo. 2014-09 to increase awareness of the proposals and to expedite improvements to ASUNo. 2014-09. The amendment affects narrow aspects of the guidance issued in ASUNo. 2014-09.
FASB ASC 944 –In May 2015, the FASB issued an update (ASUNo. 2015-09, Disclosures about Short-Duration Contracts). This update applies to all insurance entities that issue short-duration contracts as defined in Topic 944, Financial Services – Insurance. The amendment requires insurance entities to disclose for annual reporting periods information about the liability for unpaid claims and claim adjustment expenses, and information about significant changes in methodologies and assumptions used to calculate the liability for unpaid claims and claim adjustment expenses, including reasons for the change and the effects on the financial statements. Additionally, the amendments require insurance entities to disclose for annual and interim reporting periods a roll-forward of the liability for unpaid claims and claim adjustment expenses. The amendments in this update became effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2015, and interim periods within annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016, and did not have a material impact on the consolidated financial statements.
FASB ASC 825 – In January 2016, the FASB issued an update (ASUNo. 2016-01,Financial Instruments – Overall (Subtopic825-10): Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities). The amendments in this update impact public business entities as follows: 1)(1) Require equity investments (except those accounted for under the equity method of accounting or those that result in consolidation of the investee) to be measured at fair value with changes in fair value recognized in net income. 2)(2) Simplify the impairment assessment of equity investments without readily determinable fair values by requiring a qualitative assessment to identify impairment. When a qualitative assessment indicates that impairment exists, an entity is required to measure the investment at fair value. 3)(3) Eliminate the requirement to disclose the methods and significant assumptions used to estimate the fair value that is required to be disclosed for financial instruments measured at amortized cost on the balance sheet. 4)(4) Require entities to use the exit price notion when measuring the fair value of financial instruments for disclosure purposes. 5)(5) Require an entity to present separately in other comprehensive income the portion of the total change in fair value of a liability resulting from a change in the instrument-specific credit risk when the entity has elected to measure the liability at fair value in accordance with the fair value option for financial instruments. 6)(6) Require separate presentation of financial assets and financial liabilities by measurement category and form of financial asset (that is, securities or loans and receivables) on the balance sheet or the accompanying notes to the financial statements. 7)(7) Clarify that an entity should evaluate the need for a valuation allowance on a deferred tax asset related toavailable-for-sale securities in combination with the entity’s other deferred tax assets. The amendments in this update becomebecame effective for annual periods and interim periods within those annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017. We are currently evaluating the2017 and did not have a material impact of adopting the new guidance on the consolidated financial statements, but it is not expected to have a material impact.statements.
FASB ASC 842 –In February 2016, the FASB issued its new lease accounting guidance in ASUNo. 2016-02,Leases (Topic 842). Under the new guidance, lessees will be required to recognize the following for all leases, with the exception of short-term leases, at the commencement date: (1) a lease liability, which is a lessee’s obligation to make lease payments arising from a lease, measured on a discounted basis; and (2) aright-of-use asset, which is an asset that represents the lessee’s right to use, or control the use of, a specified asset for the lease term. Under the new guidance, lessor accounting is largely unchanged. The amendments in this update become effective for annual periods and interim periods within those annual periods beginning after December 15, 2018. Based on leases
outstanding at March 31, 2017,2018, we do not expect the new standard to have a material impact on our income statement, but anticipate an $80a $115 million to $100$135 million increase in our assets and liabilities. Decisions to repurchase, modify, or renew leases prior to the implementation date will impact this level of materiality.
FASB ASC 405815– In March 2016,August 2017, the FASB issued ASUNo. 2016-04, Liabilities – Extinguishments of Liabilities (Subtopic405-20)2017-12,Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815): Recognition of Breakage Targeted Improvements to Accounting for Certain Prepaid Stored-Value Products. Hedging Activities.The amendments in the update make certain targeted improvements to simplify the application of the hedge accounting guidance in current GAAP. The amendments in
this update better align an entity’s risk management activities and financial reporting for hedging relationships through changes to both the designation and measurement guidance for qualifying hedging relationships and the presentation of hedge results. To meet that objective, the amendments expand and refine hedge accounting for both nonfinancial and financial risk components and align the recognition and presentation of the effects of the hedging instrument and the hedged item in the financial statements. This update addresses several limitations that current GAAP places on the risk components, how an entity can designate the hedged item in a fair value hedge of interest rate risk, and how an entity can measure changes in fair value of the hedged item attributable to interest rate risk. In addition to the amendments to the designation and measurement guidance for qualifying hedging relationships, the amendments in this update also align the recognition and presentation of the effects of the hedging instrument and the hedged item in the financial statements to increase the understandability of the results of an entity’s intended hedging strategies. The amendments in this update require an entity to present the earnings effect of the hedging instrument in the same income statement line item in which the earnings effect of the hedged item is reported. Prior to the issuance of this ASU narrowly address breakage,update, GAAP provided special hedge accounting only for the portion of the hedge deemed to be “highly effective” and required an entity to separately reflect the amount by which the hedging instrument did not offset the hedged item, which is referred to as the monetary amount“ineffective” amount. However, the concept and reporting of hedge ineffectiveness were difficult for financial statement users to understand and, at times, for preparers to explain. The FASB board decided on an approach that no longer separately measures and reports hedge ineffectiveness. This update also includes certain targeted improvements to ease the cardapplication of current guidance related to the assessment of hedge effectiveness. Prior to the issuance of this update, GAAP contained specific requirements for initial and ongoing quantitative hedge effectiveness testing and strict requirements for specialized effectiveness testing methods that ultimately is not redeemed by the cardholderallowed an entity to forgo quantitative hedge effectiveness assessments for prepaid stored-value products that are redeemable for monetary values of goods or services but may also be redeemable for cash. Examples of prepaid stored-value products included in this amendment are prepaid gift cards issued by specific payment networks and redeemable at network-accepting merchant locations, prepaid telecommunication cards, and traveler’s checks.qualifying relationships. The amendments in this update become effective for annual periods and interim periods within those annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017. We are currently evaluating2018. Early adoption is permitted in any interim period. Management has elected to early adopt this update effective January 1, 2018 using the modified retrospective method. The impact of adopting the new guidance onadoption resulted in a reduction to Old National’s opening retained earnings of $3.2 million. In addition, as permitted by the consolidated financial statements, but it is not expectedamendments in the update, Old National reclassified $447.0 million in state and political subdivision securities with unrealized holding gains of $26.1 million from the held-to-maturity portfolio to have a material impact.the available-for-sale portfolio.
FASB ASC 815718– In March 2016,May 2017, the FASB issued ASUNo. 2016-05, Derivatives and Hedging2017-09,Compensation – Stock Compensation (Topic 815)718): EffectScope of Derivative Contract Novations on Existing Hedge Accounting Relationships. Modification Accounting.The amendments in this update provide guidance about which changes to the terms and conditions of a shared-based payment award require an entity to apply tomodification accounting. An entity should account for the effect of a modification unless all reporting entities for which therethe following are met: (1) the fair value of the modified award is a change in the counterparty to a derivative instrument that has been designated as a hedging instrument. The amendments clarify that a change in the counterparty to a derivative instrument that has been designatedsame as the hedging instrumentfair value of the original award immediately before the original award is modified. If the modification does not inaffect any of the inputs to the valuation technique that the entity uses to value the award, the entity is not required to estimate the value immediately before and after the modification; (2) the vesting conditions of itself, requirede-designationthe modified award are the same as the vesting conditions of that hedging relationship provided that all other hedge accounting criteria continue to be met.the original award immediately before the original award is modified; (3) the classification of the modified award as an equity instrument or a liability instrument is the same as the classification of the original award immediately before the original award is modified. The amendments in this update became effective for annual periods and interim periods within those annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016,2017 and did not have a material impact on the consolidated financial statements.
In March 2016, the FASB issued ASUNo. 2016-06, Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815): Contingent Put and Call Options in Debt Instruments. The amendments apply to all entities that are issuers of or investors in debt instruments (or hybrid financial instruments that are determined to have a debt host) with embedded call (put) options. Topic 815, Derivatives and Hedging, requires that embedded derivatives be separated from the host contract and accounted for separately as derivatives if certain criteria are met. One of those criteria is that the economic characteristics and risks of the embedded derivatives are not clearly and closely related to the economic characteristics and risks of the host contract. The amendments clarify what steps are required when assessing “clearly and closely related”. The amendments in this update became effective for annual periods and interim periods within those annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016, and did not have a material impact on the consolidated financial statements.
FASB ASC 323 – In March 2016, the FASB issued ASUNo. 2016-07, Investments - Equity Method and Joint Ventures (Topic 323): Simplifying the Transition to the Equity Method of Accounting. The amendments affect all entities that have an investment that becomes qualified for the equity method of accounting as a result of an increase in the level of ownership interest or degree of influence. The amendments eliminate the requirement that when an investment qualifies for use of the equity method as a result of an increase in the level of ownership interest or degree of influence, an investor must adjust the investment, results of operations, and retained earnings retroactively on astep-by-step basis as if the equity method had been in effect during all previous periods that the investment had been held. The amendments require that the equity method investor add the cost of acquiring the additional interest in the investee to the current basis of the investor’s previously held interest and adopt the equity method of accounting as of the date the investment becomes qualified for equity method accounting. Therefore, upon qualifying for the equity method of accounting, no retroactive adjustment of the investment is required. The amendments also require that an entity that has anavailable-for-sale equity security that becomes qualified for the equity method of accounting recognize through earnings the unrealized holding gain or loss in accumulated other comprehensive income at the date the investment becomes qualified for use of the equity method. The amendments in this update became effective for annual periods and interim periods within those annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016, and did not have a material impact on the consolidated financial statements.
FASB ASC 718 –In March 2016, the FASB issued ASUNo. 2016-09, Compensation – Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Improvements to Employee Shared-Based Payment Accounting. The amendments are intended to improve the accounting for employee shared-based payments and affects all organizations that issue share-based payment awards to their employees. Several aspects of the accounting for share-based payment award transactions are simplified, including the income tax consequences, the classification of awards as either equity or liabilities, and the classification on the statement of cash flows. The amendments in this update became effective on January 1, 2017 and resulted in a $0.3 million expense during the three months ended March 31, 2017.
FASB ASC 326 –In June 2016, the FASB issued ASUNo. 2016-13,Financial Instruments – Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments.Instruments. The main objective of this amendment is to provide financial statement users with more decision-useful information about the expected credit losses on financial instruments and other commitments to extend credit held by a reporting entity at each reporting date. The amendment requires the measurement of all expected credit losses for financial assets held at the reporting date based on historical experience, current conditions, and reasonable and supportable forecasts. Financial institutions and other organizations will now use forward-looking information to enhance their credit loss estimates. The amendment requires enhanced disclosures to help investors and other financial statement users better understand significant estimates and judgments used in estimating credit losses, as well as the credit quality and underwriting standards of an organization’s portfolio. In addition, the ASU amends the accounting for credit losses onavailable-for-sale debt securities and purchased financial assets with credit deterioration. The amendments in this update become effective for annual periods and interim periods within those annual periods beginning after December 15, 2019. Early adoption will be permitted beginning after December 15, 2018. We have formed a cross functional committee that is assessing ourhas overseen the enhancement of existing technology required to source and model data for the
purposes of meeting this standard. The committee has also selected a vendor to assist in generating loan level cash flows and system needs and are evaluating the impact of adopting the new guidance.disclosures. We expect to recognize aone-time cumulative effect adjustment to the allowance for loan losses as of the beginning of the first reporting period in which the new standard is effective, but cannot yet determine the magnitude of any suchone-time adjustment or the overall impact of the new guidance on the consolidated financial statements.
FASB ASC 740 –In October 2016, the FASB issued ASUNo. 2016-16,Income Taxes (Topic 740): Intra-Entity Transfers of Assets Other Than Inventory.Inventory. Current guidance prohibits the recognition of current and deferred income taxes for an intra-entity asset transfer until the asset has been sold to an outside party. This prohibition on recognition is an exception to the principle of comprehensive recognition of current and deferred income taxes in generally accepted accounting principles. The exception has led to diversity in practice and is a source of complexity in financial reporting. FASB decided that an entity should recognize the income tax consequences of an intra-entity transfer of an asset other than inventory when the transfer occurs. Consequently, the amendments in this update eliminate the exception for an intra-entity transfer of an asset other than inventory. The amendments in this update do not include new disclosure requirements; however, existing disclosure requirements might be applicable when accounting for the current and deferred income taxes for an intra-entity transfer of an asset other than inventory. For public business entities, theThe amendments in this update arebecame effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim reporting periods within those annual reporting periods. The amendments in this update should bewere applied on a modified retrospective basis through a cumulative-effect adjustmentreduction of $1.0 million directly to retained earnings as of the beginning of the period of adoption. We are currently evaluating the impact of adopting the new guidance on the consolidated financial statements, but it is not expected to have a material impact.2018.
FASB ASC 810 – In October 2016, the FASB issued ASUNo. 2016-17, Consolidation (Topic 810): Interests Held through Related Parties that are under Common Control. This update amends the consolidation guidance on how a reporting entity that is the single decision maker of a variable interest entity (VIE) should treat indirect interests in the entity held through related parties that are under common control with the reporting entity when determining whether it is the primary beneficiary of that VIE. The primary beneficiary of a VIE is the reporting entity that has a controlling financial interest in a VIE and, therefore, consolidates the VIE. A reporting entity has an indirect interest in a VIE if it has a direct interest in a related party that, in turn, has a direct interest in the VIE. The amendments in this update became effective for annual periods and interim periods within those annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016, and did not have a material impact on the consolidated financial statements.
FASB ASC 805 – In January 2017, the FASB issued ASUNo. 2017-01,Business Combinations (Topic 805): Clarifying the Definition of a Business.Business. The amendments in this update provide a more robust framework to use in determining when a set of assets and activities is a business. Because the current definition of a business is interpreted broadly and can be difficult to apply, stakeholders indicated that analyzing transactions is inefficient and costly and that the definition does not permit the use of reasonable judgment. The amendments provide more consistency in applying the guidance, reduce the costs of application, and make the definition of a business more operable. The amendments in this update becomebecame effective for annual periods and interim periods within those annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017. We are currently evaluating the impacthave completed our evaluation of adopting the new guidance on the consolidated financial statements but itand there is not expectedno impact to have a material impact.
FASB ASC 350 –In January 2017, the FASB issued ASUNo. 2017-04,Intangibles: Goodwill and Other: Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment.Impairment. To simplify the subsequent measurement of goodwill, the amendments eliminate Step 2 from the goodwill impairment test. The annual, or interim, goodwill impairment test is performed by comparing the fair value of a reporting unit with its carrying amount. An impairment charge should be recognized for the amount by which the carrying amount exceeds the reporting unit’s fair value; however, the loss recognized should not exceed the total amount of goodwill allocated to that reporting unit. In addition, the income tax effects of tax deductible goodwill on the carrying amount of the reporting unit should be considered when measuring the goodwill impairment loss, if applicable. The amendments also eliminate the requirements for any reporting unit with a zero or negative carrying amount to perform Step 2 of the goodwill impairment test. An entity still has the option to perform the qualitative assessment for a reporting unit to determine if the qualitative impairment test is necessary. The amendments should be applied on a prospective basis. The nature of and reason for the change in accounting principle should be disclosed upon transition. The amendments in this update should be adopted for annual or any interim goodwill impairment tests in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019. Early adoption is permitted on testing dates after January 1, 2017. We are currently evaluating the impact of adopting the new guidance on the consolidated financial statements, but it is not expected to have a material impact.
FASB ASC 610 –In February 2017, the FASB issued ASUNo. 2017-05,Other Income – Gains and Losses from the Derecognition of Nonfinancial Assets (Topic 610): Clarifying the Scope of Asset Derecognition Guidance and Accounting for Partial Sales of Nonfinancial Assets.Assets. Subtopic610-20 was originally issued as part of ASUNo. 2014-09 to provide guidance for recognizing gains and losses from the transfer of nonfinancial assets in contracts with noncustomers. This update was issued to help clarify uncertainties and complexities of ASU2014-09. The amendments in this update define the term in substance nonfinancial asset, in part, as a financial asset promised to a counterparty in a contract if substantially all of its fair value of the assets (recognized and unrecognized) that are promised to the counterparty in the contract is concentrated in nonfinancial assets. If substantially all of the fair value of the assets that are promised to the counterparty in a contract is concentrated in nonfinancial assets, then all of the financial assets promised to the counterparty are in substance nonfinancial assets. The amendments in this
update also clarify that nonfinancial assets within the scope of Subtopic610-20 may include nonfinancial assets transferred within a legal entity to a counterparty. The amendmentamendments in this update require an entity to derecognize a distinct nonfinancial asset or distinct in substance nonfinancial asset in a partial sale transaction when it (1) does not have (or ceases to have) a controlling financial interest in the legal entity that holds the asset in accordance with Topic 810 and (2) transfers control of the asset in accordance with Topic 606. Once an entity transfers control of a distinct nonfinancial asset or distinct in substance nonfinancial asset, it is required to measure any noncontrolling interest it receives (or retains) at fair value. The amendments are effective at the same time as the amendments in ASU2014-09. Therefore, the amendments arewere effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim reporting periods within that reporting period. We are currently evaluating theperiod and did not have a material impact of adopting the new guidance on the consolidated financial statements, but it is not expected to have a material impact.statements.
FASB ASC 715 - – In March 2017, the FASB issued ASUNo. 2017-07,Compensation – Retirement Benefits (Topic 715): Improving the Presentation of Net Periodic Pension Cost and Net Periodic Postretirement Benefit Cost.Cost. The amendments in this update require that an employer disaggregate the service cost component from the other components of net benefit cost. The amendments also provide explicit guidance on how to present the service cost component and the other components of net benefit cost in the income statement and allow only the service cost component of net benefit cost to be eligible for capitalization. The amendments in this update improve the consistency, transparency, and usefulness of financial information to users that have communicated that the service cost component generally is analyzed differently from the other components of net benefit cost. The amendments in this update becomebecame effective for annual periods and interim periods within those annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017. We are currently evaluating the2017 and did not have a material impact of adopting the new guidance on the consolidated financial statements, but it is not expected to have a material impact.statements.
FASB ASC 310 - – In March 2017, the FASB issued ASUNo. 2017-08,Receivables – Nonrefundable Fees and Other Costs (Subtopic310-20): Premium Amortization on Purchased Callable Debt Securities.Securities. This update amends the amortization period for certain purchased callable debt securities held at a premium. FASB is shortening the amortization period for the premium to the earliest call date. Under current generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”),GAAP, entities generally amortize the premium as an adjustment of yield over the contractual life of the instrument. Concerns were raised that current GAAP excludes certain callable debt securities from consideration of early repayment of principal even if the holder is certain that the call will be exercised. As a result, upon the exercise of a call on a callable debt security held at a premium, the unamortized premium is recorded as a loss in
earnings. There is diversity in practice (1) in the amortization period for premiums of callable debt securities and (2) in how the potential for exercise of a call is factored into current impairment assessments. The amendments in this update become effective for annual periods and interim periods within those annual periods beginning after December 15, 2018. We are currently evaluating the impact of adopting the new guidance on the consolidated financial statements, but it is not expected to have a material impact.
FASB ASC 220 – In February 2018, the FASB issued ASU No. 2018-02,Income Statement – Reporting Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Reclassification of Certain Tax Effects from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income. The amendments in this ASU help organizations address certain stranded income tax effects in AOCI resulting from the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act. The ASU provides financial statement preparers with an option to reclassify stranded tax effects within AOCI to retained earnings in each period in which the effect of the change in the U.S. federal corporate income tax rate in the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (or portion thereof) is recorded. The amendments are effective for all organizations for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, and interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted. Management has elected to early adopt this update effective January 1, 2018, which resulted in a reclassification that decreased beginning accumulated other comprehensive income and increased beginning retained earnings by $10.8 million.
FASB ASC 825 – In February 2018, the FASB issued an update (ASU No. 2018-03,Technical Corrections and Improvements to Financial Instruments – Overall (Subtopic 825-10): Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities). The amendments in this update clarified the guidance in ASU No. 2016-01 specifically for equity securities without a readily determinable fair value and financial liabilities for which the fair value option is elected. The amendments in this update become effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017 and interim periods within those fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2018. We are currently evaluating the impact of adopting the new guidance on the consolidated financial statements.
NOTE 34 – ACQUISITION AND DIVESTITURE ACTIVITY
Acquisitions
Anchor BanCorp WisconsinBancorp, Inc.
Effective MayNovember 1, 2016 (the “Closing Date”),2017, Old National completed the acquisition of Madison, Wisconsin-basedSt. Paul, Minnesota-based Anchor BanCorp Wisconsin Inc. (“Anchor”)(MN) through a stock and cash merger. Anchor (MN) was a savings and loanbank holding company with AnchorBank, fsb (“AnchorBank”)Anchor Bank (MN) as its wholly-owned subsidiary. AnchorBank operated 46 banking centers, including 32 banking centersFounded in 1967 and with 17 total branches, Anchor Bank (MN) was one of the largest community banks headquartered in the Twin Cities, and also served Mankato, Minnesota. Anchor Bank (MN) has no affiliation with the former AnchorBank (WI) in Madison, Milwaukee and Fox Valley triangle.Wisconsin, which Old National acquired in 2016. Old National believes that it will be able to achieve cost savings by integrating the two companies and combining accounting, data processing, retail and lending support, and other administrative functions, after the merger, which will enable Old National to achieve economies of scale in these areas.
Pursuant to the merger agreement, shareholderseach holder of Anchor could elect to receive either 3.5505(MN) common stock received $2.625 in cash and 1.350 shares of Old National common stock or $48.50 in cash for eachCommon Stock per share of Anchor they held, subject to a maximum of 40% of the purchase price in cash.(MN) common stock such holder owned. The total fair value of consideration paid for Anchor (MN) was $459.8$332.8 million, consisting of $186.2$31.9 million of cash and the issuance of 20.416.5 million shares of Old National Common Stock valued at $273.6$300.8 million. This acquisition was accounted for under the acquisition method of accounting. Accordingly, the CompanyOld National recognized amounts for identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed at their estimated acquisition date fair values. Through March 31, 2017,2018, transaction and integration costs of $15.9$14.6 million associated with thethis acquisition have been expensed and remaining integration costs will be expensed in future periods as incurred.
Under the acquisition method of accounting, the consideration paid is allocated to net tangible and intangible assets based on their current estimated fair values on the date of acquisition. Based onThe following table reflects management’s preliminary valuation of the fair value of tangible and intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed which are based on assumptions that are subject to change, the consideration paid for the Anchor acquisition is allocated as follows (in thousands):
Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 123,657 | ||
Investment securities | 235,240 | |||
Federal Home Loan Bank stock | 4,596 | |||
Loans held for sale | 9,334 | |||
Loans | 1,637,806 | |||
Premises and equipment | 35,721 | |||
Accrued interest receivable | 7,308 | |||
Other real estate owned | 17,349 | |||
Company-owned life insurance | 7,278 | |||
Other assets | 126,210 | |||
Deposits | (1,852,713 | ) | ||
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase | (3,132 | ) | ||
Other borrowings | (123 | ) | ||
Accrued expenses and other liabilities | (36,957 | ) | ||
|
| |||
Net tangible assets acquired | 311,574 | |||
Definite-lived intangible assets acquired | 21,559 | |||
Loan servicing rights | 15,274 | |||
Goodwill | 111,347 | |||
|
| |||
Total consideration paid | $ | 459,754 | ||
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents Investment securities FHLB/Federal Reserve Bank stock Loans held for sale Loans Premises and equipment Accrued interest receivable Other real estate owned Company-owned life insurance Other assets Deposits Federal funds purchased and interbank borrowings Securities sold under agreements to repurchase Other borrowings Accrued expenses and other liabilities Net tangible assets acquired Definite-lived intangible assets acquired Goodwill Total consideration $ 34,501 302,195 6,585 1,407 1,593,991 33,433 5,872 1,058 44,490 30,036 (1,777,588 ) (45,600 ) (22,965 ) (49,257 ) (25,784 ) 132,374 26,606 173,785 $ 332,765
Prior to the end of the one yearone-year measurement period for finalizing the consideration paid allocation,acquisition-date fair values, if information becomes available which would indicate adjustments are required to the allocation, such adjustments will be included in the allocation in the reporting period in which the adjustment amounts are determined.
The portion During the first quarter of 2018, immaterial adjustments were made to the preliminary valuation of the consideration paid allocatedassets acquired and liabilities assumed. These adjustments affected goodwill, definite lived intangible assets, premises and equipment, other assets, and deposits.
Goodwill related to goodwillthis acquisition will not be deductible for tax purposes.
The estimated fair value of the core deposit intangible is $21.6was $26.6 million and will beis being amortized over an estimated useful life of 710 years.
Acquired loan data for Anchor (MN) can be found in the table below:
Best Estimate at | ||||||||||||
Acquisition Date of | ||||||||||||
Fair Value | Gross Contractual | Contractual Cash | ||||||||||
of Acquired Loans | Amounts Receivable | Flows Not Expected | ||||||||||
(in thousands) | at Acquisition Date | at Acquisition Date | to be Collected | |||||||||
Acquired receivables subject to ASC310-30 | $ | 20,174 | $ | 29,544 | $ | 6,153 | ||||||
Acquired receivables not subject to ASC310-30 | $ | 1,617,632 | $ | 2,143,532 | $ | 274,155 |
Best Estimate at | ||||||||||||
Acquisition Date of | ||||||||||||
Fair Value | Gross Contractual | Contractual Cash | ||||||||||
of Acquired Loans | Cash Flows at | Flows Not Expected | ||||||||||
(in thousands) | at Acquisition Date | Acquisition Date | to be Collected | |||||||||
Acquired receivables subject to ASC 310-30 | $ | 10,555 | $ | 16,898 | $ | 4,787 | ||||||
Acquired receivables not subject to ASC 310-30 | $ | 1,583,436 | $ | 1,879,449 | $ | 87,767 |
Divestitures
On May 31, 2016, the Company sold its insurance operations, ONB Insurance Group, Inc. (“ONI”). The Company received approximately $91.8 million in cash resulting in apre-tax gain of $41.9 million and anafter-tax gain of $17.6 million. Goodwill and intangible assets of approximately $47.5 million were eliminated as part of this transaction. ONI was an ancillary business and did not meet the criteria to be treated as a discontinued operation as defined in Accounting Standards Update2014-08“Presentation of Financial Statements (Topic 205) and Property, Plant, and Equipment (Topic 360): Reporting Discontinued Operations and Disclosures of Disposals of Components of an Entity”.
Based on an ongoing assessment of our service and delivery network, the CompanyOld National consolidated five29 branches during 20162017. There are ten branches located throughout the footprint scheduled to be consolidated; nine in the second quarter and an additional fifteenone in January 2017.the third quarter of this year.
In addition, Old National entered into a branch purchase and assumption agreement for the sale of ten Old National branches in Wisconsin to Marine Credit Union of La Crosse, Wisconsin. The branch sale includes the assumption of approximately $274 million in deposits and no loans. Subject to regulatory approval and other terms and conditions, the sale is expected to close in the third quarter of 2018.
NOTE 4 -5 – NET INCOME PER SHARE
Basic and diluted net income per share are calculated using thetwo-class method. Net income is divided by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Adjustments to the weighted average number of common shares outstanding are made only when such adjustments will dilute net income per common share. Net income is then divided by the weighted-average number of common shares and common share equivalents during the period.
The following table reconciles basic and diluted net income per share for the three months ended March 31, 20172018 and 2016:2017:
Three Months Ended | Three Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
(dollars and shares in thousands, | March 31, | March 31, | ||||||||||||||
except per share data) | 2017 | 2016 | 2018 | 2017 | ||||||||||||
Basic Earnings Per Share | ||||||||||||||||
Net income | $ | 35,992 | $ | 26,977 | $ | 47,983 | $ | 35,992 | ||||||||
Weighted average common shares outstanding | 134,912 | 113,998 | 151,721 | 134,912 | ||||||||||||
Basic Net Income Per Share | $ | 0.27 | $ | 0.24 | $ | 0.32 | $ | 0.27 | ||||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||
Diluted Earnings Per Share | ||||||||||||||||
Net income | $ | 35,992 | $ | 26,977 | $ | 47,983 | $ | 35,992 | ||||||||
Weighted average common shares outstanding | 134,912 | 113,998 | 151,721 | 134,912 | ||||||||||||
Effect of dilutive securities: | ||||||||||||||||
Restricted stock (1) | 445 | 526 | ||||||||||||||
Stock options (2) | 74 | 39 | ||||||||||||||
Restricted stock | 569 | 445 | ||||||||||||||
Stock options (1) | 80 | 74 | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||
Weighted average shares outstanding | 135,431 | 114,563 | 152,370 | 135,431 | ||||||||||||
Diluted Net Income Per Share | $ | 0.27 | $ | 0.24 | $ | 0.31 | $ | 0.27 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
(1) |
NOTE 5 – ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
The following table summarizes the changes within each classification of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) (“AOCI”) net of tax for the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016:
(dollars in thousands) | Unrealized Gains and Losses on Available-for-Sale Securities | Unrealized Gains and Losses on Held-to-Maturity Securities | Gains and Losses on Cash Flow Hedges | Defined Benefit Pension Plans | Total | |||||||||||||||
Three Months Ended March 31, 2017 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Balance at January 1, 2017 | $ | (39,012 | ) | $ | (13,310 | ) | $ | (6,715 | ) | $ | (335 | ) | $ | (59,372 | ) | |||||
Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications | 9,967 | — | 360 | — | 10,327 | |||||||||||||||
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) (a) | (947 | ) | 295 | 1,115 | 17 | 480 | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
Net other comprehensive income (loss) | 9,020 | 295 | 1,475 | 17 | 10,807 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
Balance at March 31, 2017 | $ | (29,992 | ) | $ | (13,015 | ) | $ | (5,240 | ) | $ | (318 | ) | $ | (48,565 | ) | |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
Three Months Ended March 31, 2016 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Balance at January 1, 2016 | $ | (3,806 | ) | $ | (14,480 | ) | $ | (9,276 | ) | $ | (7,235 | ) | $ | (34,797 | ) | |||||
Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications | 11,282 | — | (6,900 | ) | — | 4,382 | ||||||||||||||
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) (a) | (699 | ) | 306 | 789 | 434 | 830 | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
Net other comprehensive income (loss) | 10,583 | 306 | (6,111 | ) | 434 | 5,212 | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
Balance at March 31, 2016 | $ | 6,777 | $ | (14,174 | ) | $ | (15,387 | ) | $ | (6,801 | ) | $ | (29,585 | ) | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table summarizes the significant amounts reclassified out of each component of AOCI for the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016:
Amount Reclassified | Affected Line Item in the | |||||||||
Details about AOCI Components | from AOCI | Statement of Income | ||||||||
Three Months Ended | ||||||||||
March 31, | ||||||||||
(dollars in thousands) | 2017 | 2016 | ||||||||
Unrealized gains and losses onavailable-for-sale securities | $ | 1,500 | $ | 1,106 | Net securities gains | |||||
(553 | ) | (407 | ) | Income tax (expense) benefit | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||
$ | 947 | $ | 699 | Net income | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||
Unrealized gains and losses onheld-to-maturity securities | $ | (449 | ) | $ | (465 | ) | Interest income (expense) | |||
154 | 159 | Income tax (expense) benefit | ||||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||
$ | (295 | ) | $ | (306 | ) | Net income | ||||
|
|
|
| |||||||
Gains and losses on cash flow hedges | $ | (1,799 | ) | $ | (1,273 | ) | Interest income (expense) | |||
684 | 484 | Income tax (expense) benefit | ||||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||
$ | (1,115 | ) | $ | (789 | ) | Net income | ||||
|
|
|
| |||||||
Amortization of defined benefit pension items | $ | (27 | ) | $ | (700 | ) | Salaries and employee benefits | |||
10 | 266 | Income tax (expense) benefit | ||||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||
$ | (17 | ) | $ | (434 | ) | Net income | ||||
|
|
|
| |||||||
Total reclassifications for the period | $ | (480 | ) | $ | (830 | ) | Net income | |||
|
|
|
|
NOTE 6 -– INVESTMENT SECURITIES
The following table summarizes the amortized cost and fair value of theavailable-for-sale andheld-to-maturity investment securities portfolio at March 31, 20172018 and December 31, 20162017 and the corresponding amounts of unrealized gains and losses therein:
Amortized | Unrealized | Unrealized | Fair | Amortized | Unrealized | Unrealized | Fair | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
(dollars in thousands) | Cost | Gains | Losses | Value | Cost | Gains | Losses | Value | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
March 31, 2017 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
March 31, 2018 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Available-for-Sale | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
U.S. Treasury | $ | 11,966 | $ | 152 | $ | (1 | ) | $ | 12,117 | $ | 9,292 | $ | 32 | $ | (29 | ) | $ | 9,295 | ||||||||||||||
U.S. government-sponsored entities and agencies | 553,203 | 110 | (10,279 | ) | 543,034 | 587,140 | 1 | (14,452 | ) | 572,689 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Mortgage-backed securities - Agency | 1,496,620 | 5,866 | (27,491 | ) | 1,474,995 | 1,527,777 | 648 | (50,529 | ) | 1,477,896 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
States and political subdivisions | 457,358 | 4,948 | (9,755 | ) | 452,551 | 837,946 | 9,930 | (4,388 | ) | 843,488 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Pooled trust preferred securities | 16,852 | — | (8,564 | ) | 8,288 | 13,899 | — | (5,704 | ) | 8,195 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Other securities | 328,167 | 1,407 | (3,616 | ) | 325,958 | 312,763 | 594 | (5,057 | ) | 308,300 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Totalavailable-for-sale securities | $ | 2,864,166 | $ | 12,483 | $ | (59,706 | ) | $ | 2,816,943 | $ | 3,288,817 | $ | 11,205 | $ | (80,159 | ) | $ | 3,219,863 | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Held-to-Maturity | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
U.S. government-sponsored entities and agencies | $ | 40,021 | $ | 89 | $ | — | $ | 40,110 | $ | 73,369 | $ | — | $ | (1,925 | ) | $ | 71,444 | |||||||||||||||
Mortgage-backed securities - Agency | 9,566 | 288 | — | 9,854 | 145,658 | 75 | (2,966 | ) | 142,767 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
States and political subdivisions | 691,861 | 43,210 | (129 | ) | 734,942 | 316,126 | 8,278 | (2,472 | ) | 321,932 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Totalheld-to-maturity securities | $ | 741,448 | $ | 43,587 | $ | (129 | ) | $ | 784,906 | $ | 535,153 | $ | 8,353 | $ | (7,363 | ) | $ | 536,143 | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
December 31, 2016 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
December 31, 2017 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Available-for-Sale | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
U.S. Treasury | $ | 6,963 | $ | 140 | $ | — | $ | 7,103 | $ | 5,473 | $ | 83 | $ | (5 | ) | $ | 5,551 | |||||||||||||||
U.S. government-sponsored entities and agencies | 506,234 | 113 | (12,391 | ) | 493,956 | 675,643 | 3 | (11,360 | ) | 664,286 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Mortgage-backed securities - Agency | 1,551,465 | 6,923 | (33,369 | ) | 1,525,019 | 1,704,014 | 1,600 | (37,932 | ) | 1,667,682 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
States and political subdivisions | 446,003 | 4,183 | (13,502 | ) | 436,684 | 529,835 | 5,085 | (4,727 | ) | 530,193 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Pooled trust preferred securities | 17,011 | — | (8,892 | ) | 8,119 | 16,605 | — | (8,157 | ) | 8,448 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Other securities | 331,001 | 1,074 | (5,782 | ) | 326,293 | 321,016 | 1,172 | (2,141 | ) | 320,047 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Totalavailable-for-sale securities | $ | 2,858,677 | $ | 12,433 | $ | (73,936 | ) | $ | 2,797,174 | $ | 3,252,586 | $ | 7,943 | $ | (64,322 | ) | $ | 3,196,207 | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Held-to-Maturity | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
U.S. government-sponsored entities and agencies | $ | 40,131 | $ | 427 | $ | — | $ | 40,558 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mortgage-backed securities - Agency | 10,640 | 300 | — | 10,940 | $ | 6,903 | $ | 153 | $ | — | $ | 7,056 | ||||||||||||||||||||
States and political subdivisions | 694,319 | 38,915 | (560 | ) | 732,674 | 677,160 | 43,495 | (8 | ) | 720,647 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Totalheld-to-maturity securities | $ | 745,090 | $ | 39,642 | $ | (560 | ) | $ | 784,172 | $ | 684,063 | $ | 43,648 | $ | (8 | ) | $ | 727,703 | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As previously disclosed in Note 3, upon the early adoption of ASU No. 2017-12 on January 1, 2018, Old National reclassified $447.0 million in state and political subdivision securities from the held-to-maturity portfolio to the available-for-sale portfolio. Separately, on January 1, 2018, U.S. government-sponsored entities and agencies, agency mortgage-backed securities, and state and political subdivision securities with a fair value of $324.0 million were transferred from the available-for-sale portfolio to the held-to-maturity portfolio. The $10.8 million unrealized holding loss, net of tax, at the date of transfer shall continue to be reported as a separate component of shareholders’ equity and will be amortized over the remaining life of the securities as an adjustment to yield. The corresponding discount on these securities will offset this adjustment to yield as it is amortized.
Proceeds from sales or calls ofavailable-for-sale investment securities, the resulting realized gains and realized losses, and other securities gains or losses were as follows for the three months ended March 31, 20172018 and 2016:2017:
Three Months Ended | ||||||||
March 31, | ||||||||
(dollars in thousands) | 2017 | 2016 | ||||||
Proceeds from sales ofavailable-for-sale securities | $ | 33,588 | $ | 76,650 | ||||
Proceeds from calls ofavailable-for-sale securities | 10,520 | 124,311 | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Total | $ | 44,108 | $ | 200,961 | ||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Realized gains on sales ofavailable-for-sale securities | $ | 1,329 | $ | 1,660 | ||||
Realized gains on calls ofavailable-for-sale securities | — | 244 | ||||||
Realized losses on sales ofavailable-for-sale securities | (30 | ) | (446 | ) | ||||
Realized losses on calls ofavailable-for-sale securities | (1 | ) | (87 | ) | ||||
Other securities gains (losses) (1) | 202 | (265 | ) | |||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Net securities gains (losses) | $ | 1,500 | $ | 1,106 | ||||
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended | ||||||||
March 31, | ||||||||
(dollars in thousands) | 2018 | 2017 | ||||||
Proceeds from sales of available-for-sale securities | $ | 84,257 | $ | 33,588 | ||||
Proceeds from calls of available-for-sale securities | 17,436 | 10,520 | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Total | $ | 101,693 | $ | 44,108 | ||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Realized gains on sales of available-for-sale securities | $ | 2,008 | $ | 1,329 | ||||
Realized gains on calls of available-for-sale securities | 1 | — | ||||||
Realized losses on sales of available-for-sale securities | (1,257 | ) | (30 | ) | ||||
Realized losses on calls of available-for-sale securities | (49 | ) | (1 | ) | ||||
Other securities gains (losses) (1) | 85 | 202 | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Net securities gains (losses) | $ | 788 | $ | 1,500 | ||||
|
|
|
|
(1) | Other securities gains (losses) includes net realized and unrealized gains or losses associated with trading securities and mutual funds. |
Trading securities, which consist of mutual funds held in trusts associated with deferred compensation plans for former directors and executives, are recorded at fair value and totaled $5.1$5.6 million at March 31, 20172018 and $5.0 million at December 31, 2016.2017.
All of the mortgage-backed securities in the investment portfolio are residential mortgage-backed securities. The amortized cost and fair value of the investment securities portfolio are shown by expected maturity. Expected maturities may differ from contractual maturities if borrowers have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without call or prepayment penalties. Weighted average yield is based on amortized cost.
At March 31, 2017 | At March 31, 2018 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
(dollars in thousands) | Weighted | Weighted | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Amortized | Fair | Average | Amortized | Fair | Average | |||||||||||||||||||
Maturity | Cost | Value | Yield | Cost | Value | Yield | ||||||||||||||||||
Available-for-Sale | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Within one year | $ | 38,790 | $ | 38,870 | 1.78 | % | $ | 60,568 | $ | 60,503 | 2.16 | % | ||||||||||||
One to five years | 311,574 | 311,107 | 2.19 | 495,123 | 490,729 | 2.28 | ||||||||||||||||||
Five to ten years | 386,471 | 388,129 | 2.78 | 377,525 | 374,850 | 2.83 | ||||||||||||||||||
Beyond ten years | 2,127,331 | 2,078,837 | 2.45 | 2,355,601 | 2,293,781 | 2.61 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||
Total | $ | 2,864,166 | $ | 2,816,943 | 2.46 | % | $ | 3,288,817 | $ | 3,219,863 | 2.58 | % | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||
Held-to-Maturity | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Within one year | $ | 22,670 | $ | 23,140 | 5.87 | % | $ | 22,368 | $ | 22,563 | 3.74 | % | ||||||||||||
One to five years | 68,261 | 70,943 | 4.37 | 36,340 | 37,201 | 4.04 | ||||||||||||||||||
Five to ten years | 147,381 | 154,829 | 4.83 | 80,260 | 82,779 | 4.35 | ||||||||||||||||||
Beyond ten years | 503,136 | 535,994 | 5.61 | 396,185 | 393,600 | 4.59 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||
Total | $ | 741,448 | $ | 784,906 | 5.35 | % | $ | 535,153 | $ | 536,143 | 3.74 | % | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table summarizes the investment securities with unrealized losses at March 31, 20172018 and December 31, 20162017 by aggregated major security type and length of time in a continuous unrealized loss position:
Less than 12 months | 12 months or longer | Total | Less than 12 months | 12 months or longer | Total | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fair | Unrealized | Fair | Unrealized | Fair | Unrealized | Fair | Unrealized | Fair | Unrealized | Fair | Unrealized | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(dollars in thousands) | Value | Losses | Value | Losses | Value | Losses | Value | Losses | Value | Losses | Value | Losses | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
March 31, 2017 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
March 31, 2018 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Available-for-Sale | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
U.S. Treasury | $ | 5,273 | $ | (29 | ) | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 5,273 | $ | (29 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
U.S. government-sponsored entities and agencies | 240,181 | (4,428 | ) | 331,504 | (10,024 | ) | 571,685 | (14,452 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mortgage-backed securities - Agency | 753,315 | (19,422 | ) | 630,193 | (31,107 | ) | 1,383,508 | (50,529 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
States and political subdivisions | 294,601 | (4,065 | ) | 7,782 | (323 | ) | 302,383 | �� | (4,388 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pooled trust preferred securities | — | — | 8,195 | (5,704 | ) | 8,195 | (5,704 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other securities | 110,546 | (2,522 | ) | 122,440 | (2,535 | ) | 232,986 | (5,057 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total available-for-sale | $ | 1,403,916 | $ | (30,466 | ) | $ | 1,100,114 | $ | (49,693 | ) | $ | 2,504,030 | $ | (80,159 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Held-to-Maturity | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
U.S. government-sponsored entities and agencies | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 71,444 | $ | (1,925 | ) | $ | 71,444 | $ | (1,925 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mortgage-backed securities - Agency | 37,880 | (664 | ) | 103,727 | (2,302 | ) | 141,607 | (2,966 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
States and political subdivisions | 38,606 | (860 | ) | 67,909 | (1,612 | ) | 106,515 | (2,472 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total held-to-maturity | $ | 76,486 | $ | (1,524 | ) | $ | 243,080 | $ | (5,839 | ) | $ | 319,566 | $ | (7,363 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
December 31, 2017 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Available-for-Sale | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
U.S. Treasury | $ | 6,499 | $ | (1 | ) | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 6,499 | $ | (1 | ) | $ | 1,480 | $ | (5 | ) | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 1,480 | $ | (5 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
U.S. government-sponsored entities and agencies | 455,813 | (10,279 | ) | — | — | 455,813 | (10,279 | ) | 201,773 | (1,333 | ) | 408,493 | (10,027 | ) | 610,266 | (11,360 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mortgage-backed securities - Agency | 1,176,954 | (24,778 | ) | 55,246 | (2,713 | ) | 1,232,200 | (27,491 | ) | 789,804 | (8,692 | ) | 774,825 | (29,240 | ) | 1,564,629 | (37,932 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
States and political subdivisions | 227,130 | (9,557 | ) | 5,702 | (198 | ) | 232,832 | (9,755 | ) | 196,024 | (1,899 | ) | 90,637 | (2,828 | ) | 286,661 | (4,727 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pooled trust preferred securities | — | — | 8,288 | (8,564 | ) | 8,288 | (8,564 | ) | — | — | 8,448 | (8,157 | ) | 8,448 | (8,157 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other securities | 100,136 | (1,973 | ) | 102,143 | (1,643 | ) | 202,279 | (3,616 | ) | 61,260 | (429 | ) | 125,517 | (1,712 | ) | 186,777 | (2,141 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Totalavailable-for-sale | $ | 1,966,532 | $ | (46,588 | ) | $ | 171,379 | $ | (13,118 | ) | $ | 2,137,911 | $ | (59,706 | ) | $ | 1,250,341 | $ | (12,358 | ) | $ | 1,407,920 | $ | (51,964 | ) | $ | 2,658,261 | $ | (64,322 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Held-to-Maturity | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
States and political subdivisions | $ | 30,153 | $ | (129 | ) | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 30,153 | $ | (129 | ) | $ | 2,309 | $ | (8 | ) | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 2,309 | $ | (8 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Totalheld-to-maturity | $ | 30,153 | $ | (129 | ) | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 30,153 | $ | (129 | ) | $ | 2,309 | $ | (8 | ) | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 2,309 | $ | (8 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
December 31, 2016 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Available-for-Sale | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
U.S. government-sponsored entities and agencies | $ | 432,192 | $ | (12,391 | ) | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 432,192 | $ | (12,391 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mortgage-backed securities - Agency | 1,177,093 | (30,295 | ) | 57,636 | (3,074 | ) | 1,234,729 | (33,369 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
States and political subdivisions | 286,351 | (13,247 | ) | 4,919 | (255 | ) | 291,270 | (13,502 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pooled trust preferred securities | — | — | 8,119 | (8,892 | ) | 8,119 | (8,892 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other securities | 121,498 | (2,734 | ) | 126,539 | (3,048 | ) | 248,037 | (5,782 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Totalavailable-for-sale | $ | 2,017,134 | $ | (58,667 | ) | $ | 197,213 | $ | (15,269 | ) | $ | 2,214,347 | $ | (73,936 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Held-to-Maturity | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
States and political subdivisions | $ | 59,481 | $ | (560 | ) | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 59,481 | $ | (560 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Totalheld-to-maturity | $ | 59,481 | $ | (560 | ) | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 59,481 | $ | (560 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
In addition to the unrealized losses at March 31, 2018 presented above, there is an additional $14.0 million of unrealized losses on securities that exist due to securities previously transferred from available-for-sale to held-to-maturity.
Management evaluates securities for other-than-temporary impairment (“OTTI”)OTTI at least on a quarterly basis, and more frequently when economic or market conditions warrant such an evaluation. The investment securities portfolio is evaluated for OTTI by segregating the portfolio into two general segments and applying the appropriate OTTI model. Investment securities classified asavailable-for-sale orheld-to-maturity are generally evaluated for OTTI under FASB ASC 320, (SFAS No. 115,Accounting for Certain Investments in– Debt and Equity Securities). However, certain purchased beneficial interests, includingnon-agency mortgage-backed securities, asset-backed securities, and collateralized debt obligations, that had credit ratings at the time of purchase of below AA are evaluated using the model outlined in FASB ASC325-10 (EITF IssueNo. 99-20,Recognition of Interest Income and Impairment on Purchased Beneficial Interests and Beneficial Interests that Continue to be Held by a Transfer in Securitized Financial Assets).
Securities. In determining OTTI under the FASB ASC 320, (SFAS No. 115) model, management considers many factors, including: (1) the length of time and the extent to which the fair value has been less than cost, (2) the financial condition and near-term prospects of the issuer, (3) whether the market decline was affected by macroeconomic conditions, and (4) whether the entity has the intent to sell the debt security or more likely than not will be required to sell the debt security before its anticipated recovery. The assessment of whether an other-than-temporary decline exists involves a high degree of subjectivity and judgment and is based on the information available to management at a point in time. The second segment of the portfolio uses the
When OTTI guidance provided by FASB ASC325-10 (EITF99-20) that is specific to purchased beneficial interests that, on the purchase date, were rated below AA. Under the FASB ASC325-10 model, we compare the present value of the remaining cash flows as estimated at the preceding evaluation date to the current expected remaining cash flows. An OTTI is deemed to have occurred if there has been an adverse change in the remaining expected future cash flows.
When other-than-temporary impairment occurs, under either model, the amount of the other-than-temporary impairmentOTTI recognized in earnings depends on whether an entity intends to sell the security or more likely than not will be required to sell the security before recovery of its amortized cost basis less any current-period credit loss. If an entity intends to sell or more likely than not will be required to sell the security
before recovery of its amortized cost basis less any current-period credit loss, the other-than-temporary impairmentOTTI shall be recognized in earnings equal to the entire difference between the investment’s amortized cost basis and its fair value at the balance sheet date. Otherwise, the other-than-temporary impairmentOTTI shall be separated into the amount representing the credit loss and the amount related to all other factors. The amount of the total other-than-temporary impairmentOTTI related to the credit loss is determined based on the present value of cash flows expected to be collected and is recognized in earnings. The amount of the total other-than-temporary impairmentOTTI related to other factors shall be recognized in other comprehensive income, net of applicable taxes. The previous amortized cost basis less the other-than-temporary impairmentOTTI recognized in earnings shall become the new amortized cost basis of the investment.
We did not record other-than-temporary-impairmentsThere was no OTTI recorded during the three months ended March 31, 20172018 or 2016.2017.
At March 31, 2017,2018, Old National’s securities portfolio consisted of 1,6601,690 securities, 408850 of which were in an unrealized loss position. The unrealized losses attributable to our U.S. Treasury, U.S. government-sponsored entities and agencies, agency mortgage-backed securities, states and political subdivisions, and other securities are the result of fluctuations in interest rates. Our pooled trust preferred securities are discussed below.
Pooled Trust Preferred Securities
At March 31, 2017, our securities portfolio contained three pooled trust preferred securities with a fair value of $8.3 million and unrealized losses of $8.6 million. One of the pooled trust preferred securities in our portfolio falls within the scope of FASB ASC325-10 (EITF99-20) and has a fair value of $0.3 million with an unrealized loss of $2.7 million at March 31, 2017. This security was rated A3 at inception, but is rated D at March 31, 2017. The issuers in this security are banks. We use the OTTI evaluation model to compare the present value of expected cash flows to the previous estimate to determine whether an adverse change in cash flows has occurred during the quarter. The OTTI model considers the structure and term of the collateralized debt obligation (“CDO”) and the financial condition of the underlying issuers. Specifically, the model details interest rates, principal balances of note classes and underlying issuers, the timing and amount of interest and principal payments of the underlying issuers, and the allocation of the payments to the note classes. The current estimate of expected cash flows is based on the most recent trustee reports and any other relevant market information including announcements of interest payment deferrals or defaults of underlying trust preferred securities. Assumptions used in the model include expected future default rates and prepayments. We assume no recoveries on defaults and a limited number of recoveries on current or projected interest payment deferrals. In addition, we use the model to “stress” this CDO, or make assumptions more severe than expected activity, to determine the degree to which assumptions could deteriorate before the CDO could no longer fully support repayment of Old National’s note class. For the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016, our model indicated no other-than-temporary-impairment losses on this security. At March 31, 2017,2018, we had no intent to sell any securities that were in an unrealized loss position nor is it expected that we would be required to sell any securities.
Two ofPooled Trust Preferred Securities
At March 31, 2018, our securities portfolio contained two pooled trust preferred securities with a fair value of $8.0$8.2 million and unrealized losses of $5.9 million at March 31, 2017$5.7 million. These securities are not subject to FASB ASC325-10. These securities 325-10 and are evaluated using collateral-specific assumptions to estimate the expected future interest and principal cash flows. For the three months ended March 31, 20172018 and 2016,2017, our analysis indicated no OTTI on these securities.
During the first quarter of 2018, Old National sold a pooled trust security that fell within the scope of FASB ASC 325-10 (EITF 99-20). Proceeds from the sale were $1.8 million, which resulted in a loss of $0.9 million. Although Old National typically does not sell securities in an unrealized loss position, this security was sold because the final liquidation value was significantly higher than our assessment of value for this position.
The table below summarizes the relevant characteristics of our pooled trust preferred securities as well as our single issuer trust preferred securities that are included in the “other securities” category in this footnote. Each of the pooled trust preferred securities support a more senior tranche of security holders. All threeBoth pooled trust preferred securities have experienced credit defaults. However, two of these securities have excess subordination and are not other-than-temporarily-impairedother-than-temporarily impaired as a result of their class hierarchy, which provides more loss protection.
Trust preferred securities | Actual | Expected | Excess | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
March 31, 2018 | Deferrals | Defaults as | Subordination | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(dollars in | # of Issuers | and Defaults | a % of | as a % of | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
thousands) | Lowest | Unrealized | Realized | Currently | as a % of | Remaining | Current | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Credit | Amortized | Fair | Gain/ | Losses | Performing/ | Original | Performing | Performing | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Actual | Expected | Excess | Class | Rating (1) | Cost | Value | (Loss) | 2018 | Remaining | Collateral | Collateral | Collateral | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Deferrals | Defaults as | Subordination | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
# of Issuers | and Defaults | a % of | as a % of | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Trust preferred securities | Lowest | Unrealized | Realized | Currently | as a % of | Remaining | Current | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
March 31, 2017 | Credit | Amortized | Fair | Gain/ | Losses | Performing/ | Original | Performing | Performing | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(dollars in thousands) | Class | Rating (1) | Cost | Value | (Loss) | 2017 | Remaining | Collateral | Collateral | Collateral | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pooled trust preferred securities: | Pooled trust preferred securities: | Pooled trust preferred securities: |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reg Div Funding 2004 | B-2 | D | $ | 2,948 | $ | 263 | $ | (2,685 | ) | $ | — | 22/37 | 32.1 | % | 7.5 | % | 0.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pretsl XXVII LTD | B | B | 4,422 | 2,381 | (2,041 | ) | — | 35/44 | 16.7 | % | 4.3 | % | 46.5 | % | B | B | $ | 4,399 | $ | 2,442 | $ | (1,957 | ) | $ | — | 35/44 | 16.7 | % | 4.2 | % | 46.7 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Trapeza Ser 13A | A2A | BBB | 9,482 | 5,644 | (3,838 | ) | — | 50/55 | 4.5 | % | 4.8 | % | 45.8 | % | A2A | BBB | 9,500 | 5,753 | (3,747 | ) | — | 48/53 | 4.5 | % | 4.5 | % | 46.2 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
16,852 | 8,288 | (8,564 | ) | — |
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
13,899 | 8,195 | (5,704 | ) | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Single Issuer trust preferred securities: | Single Issuer trust preferred securities: |
| Single Issuer trust preferred securities: |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fleet Cap Tr V (BOA) | BB+ | 3,399 | 3,211 | (188 | ) | — | BBB- | 3,409 | 3,325 | (84 | ) | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
JP Morgan Chase Cap XIII | BBB- | 4,770 | 4,513 | (257 | ) | — | BBB- | 4,780 | 4,650 | (130 | ) | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
NB-Global | BB+ | 790 | 915 | 125 | — | BBB- | 808 | 941 | 133 | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Chase Cap II | BBB- | 826 | 908 | 82 | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
9,785 | 9,547 | (238 | ) | — |
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
8,997 | 8,916 | (81 | ) | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total | $ | 26,637 | $ | 17,835 | $ | (8,802 | ) | $ | — | $ | 22,896 | $ | 17,111 | $ | (5,785 | ) | $ | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) | Lowest rating for the security provided by any nationally recognized credit rating agency. |
Mortgage loans held for immediate sale in the secondary market were $17.4$17.6 million at March 31, 2017,2018, compared to $90.7$17.9 million at December 31, 2016.2017. Residential loans that Old National has originated with the intent to sell are recorded at fair value in accordance with FASB ASC825-10, (SFAS No. 159 –The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial LiabilitiesInstruments). Beginning with the inception of anin-house servicing unit in the third quarter of 2014, conventionalConventional mortgage production is sold on a servicing retained basis. Certain loans, such as government guaranteed mortgage loans are sold on servicing released basis.
NOTE 8 – LOANS AND ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN LOSSES
Old National’s finance receivablesloans consist primarily of loans made to consumers and commercial clients in various industries including manufacturing, agribusiness, transportation, mining, wholesaling, and retailing. Most of Old National’s lending activity occurs within our principal geographic markets of Indiana, Kentucky, Michigan, Wisconsin, and Wisconsin.Minnesota. Old National manages concentrations of credit exposure by industry, product, geography, customer relationship, and loan size, with no concentrationsize. While loans to lessors of loans exceedingboth residential and non-residential real estate exceed 10% of its portfolio.total loans, no individual sub-segment category within those broader categories reach the 10% threshold.
The composition of loans by lending classification was as follows:
March 31, | December 31, | March 31, | December 31, | |||||||||||||
(dollars in thousands) | 2017 | 2016 | 2018 | 2017 | ||||||||||||
Commercial (1) | $ | 1,910,536 | $ | 1,917,099 | $ | 2,811,629 | $ | 2,717,269 | ||||||||
Commercial real estate: | ||||||||||||||||
Construction | 357,055 | 357,802 | 351,448 | 374,306 | ||||||||||||
Other (2) | 2,865,810 | 2,773,051 | ||||||||||||||
Other | 4,098,532 | 3,980,246 | ||||||||||||||
Residential real estate | 2,112,262 | 2,087,530 | 2,158,532 | 2,167,053 | ||||||||||||
Consumer credit: | ||||||||||||||||
Home equity | 464,911 | 476,439 | 487,237 | 507,507 | ||||||||||||
Auto | 1,199,580 | 1,167,737 | 1,117,027 | 1,148,672 | ||||||||||||
Other | 221,619 | 230,854 | 214,277 | 223,068 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||
Total loans | 9,131,773 | 9,010,512 | 11,238,682 | 11,118,121 | ||||||||||||
Allowance for loan losses | (49,834 | ) | (49,808 | ) | (50,381 | ) | (50,381 | ) | ||||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||
Net loans | $ | 9,081,939 | $ | 8,960,704 | $ | 11,188,301 | $ | 11,067,740 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
(1) | Includes direct finance leases of |
The risk characteristics of each loan portfolio segment are as follows:
Commercial
Commercial loans are primarily based on the identified cash flows of the borrower and secondarily on the underlying collateral provided by the borrower. The cash flows of borrowers, however, may not be as expected and the collateral securing these loans may fluctuate in value. Most commercial loans are secured by the assets being financed or other business assets such as accounts receivable or inventory and may incorporate a personal guarantee; however, some loans may be made on an unsecured basis. In the case of loans secured by accounts receivable, the availability of funds for the repayment of these loans may be substantially dependent on the ability of the borrower to collect amounts due from its customers.
Commercial Real Estate
These loans are viewed primarily as cash flow loans and secondarily as loans secured by real estate. Commercial real estate lending typically involves higher loan principal amounts, and the repayment of these loans is generally dependent on the successful operation of the property securing the loan or the business conducted on the property securing the loan. Commercial real estate loans may be adversely affected by conditions in the real estate markets or in the general economy. The properties securing Old National’s commercial real estate portfolio are diverse in terms of type and geographic location. Management monitors and evaluates commercial real estate loans based on collateral, geography and risk grade criteria. In addition, management tracks the level of owner-occupied commercial real estate loans versusnon-owner occupied loans.
Included with commercial real estate are construction loans, which are underwritten utilizing independent appraisal reviews, sensitivity analysis of absorption and lease rates, financial analysis of the developers and property owners, and feasibility studies, if available. Construction loans are generally based on estimates of costs and value associated with the complete project. These estimates may be inaccurate. Construction loans often involve the disbursement of substantial funds with repayment substantially dependent on the success of the ultimate project. Sources of repayment for these types of loans may bepre-committed permanent loans from approved long-term lenders (including Old National), sales of developed property, or an interim loan commitment from Old National until permanent financing is obtained. These loans are closely monitored byon-site inspections and are considered to have higher risks than other real estate loans due to their ultimate repayment being sensitive to interest rate changes, governmental regulation of real property, general economic conditions, and the availability of long-term financing.
The acquisition of Anchor (MN) on MayNovember 1, 20162017 added $926.2$864.4 million of commercial real estate loans to our portfolio. At 189%208%, Old National Bank’s commercial real estate loans as a percentage of its risk-based capital remained well below the regulatory guideline limit of 300% at March 31, 2017.2018.
Residential
With respect to residential loans that are secured by1-4 family residences and are generally owner occupied, Old National typically establishes a maximumloan-to-value ratio and generally requires private mortgage insurance if that ratio is exceeded. Repayment of these loans is primarily dependent on the personal income of the borrowers, which can be impacted by economic conditions in their market areas such as unemployment levels. Repayment can also be impacted by changes in residential property values. Risk is mitigated by the fact that the loans are of smaller individual amounts and spread over a large number of borrowers.
Consumer
Home equity loans are typically secured by a subordinate interest in1-4 family residences, and consumer loans are secured by consumer assets such as automobiles or recreational vehicles. We assumed student loans in the acquisition of Anchor (WI) in May 2016. At March 31, 2017, studentStudent loans totaled $74.6 million and are guaranteed by the government from 97% to 100%. and totaled $66.0 million at March 31, 2018, compared to $68.2 million at December 31, 2017. Some consumer loans are unsecured such as small installment loans and certain lines of credit. Repayment of these loans is primarily dependent on the personal income of the borrowers, which can be impacted by economic conditions in their market areas such as unemployment levels. Repayment can also be impacted by changes in residential property or other collateral values. Risk is mitigated by the fact that the loans are of smaller individual amounts and spread over a large number of borrowers.
Covered loans
Covered loans totaled $95.4 million at March 31, 2016 and were reclassified to the appropriate loan portfolio segments on the balance sheet for that period. Covered loans were subject to loss share agreements. Old National entered into an agreement with the FDIC on June 22, 2016 to terminate its loss share agreements. Under the early termination agreement, the FDIC made a final payment of $8.7 million to Old National as consideration for the early termination. All future gains and losses associated with covered loans will be recognized entirely by Old National.
Allowance for Loan Losses
The allowance for loan losses is maintained at a level believed adequate by management to absorb probable losses incurred in the consolidated loan portfolio. Management’s evaluation of the adequacy of the allowance is an estimate based on reviews of individual loans, pools of homogeneous loans, assessments of the impact of current and anticipated economic conditions on the portfolio, and historical loss experience. The allowance is increased through a provision charged to operating expense. Loans deemed to be uncollectible are charged to the allowance. Recoveries of loans previouslycharged-off are added to the allowance.
We utilize a probability of default (“PD”)PD and loss given default (“LGD”)LGD model as a tool to determine the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses for performing commercial and commercial real estate loans. The PD is forecast using a transition matrix to determine the likelihood of a customer’s asset quality rating (“AQR”)AQR migrating from its current AQR to any other status within the time horizon. Transition rates are measured using Old National’s own historical experience. The model assumes that recent historical transition rates will continue into the future. The LGD is defined as credit loss incurred when an obligor of the bank defaults. The sum of all net charge-offs for a particular portfolio segment are divided by all loans that have defaulted over a given period of time. The expected loss derived from the model considers the PD, LGD, and exposure at default. Additionally, qualitative factors, such as changes in lending policies or procedures, and economic business conditions are also considered.
We use historic loss ratios adjusted for economic conditions to determine the appropriate level of allowance for residential real estate and consumer loans.
No allowance was brought forward on any of the acquired loans as any credit deterioration evident in the loans was included in the determination of the fair value of the loans at the acquisition date. An allowance for loan losses will be established for any subsequent credit deterioration or adverse changes in expected cash flows.
Old National’s activity in the allowance for loan losses for the three months ended March 31, 20172018 and 20162017 was as follows:
Commercial | Commercial | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(dollars in thousands) | Commercial | Real Estate | Residential | Consumer | Unallocated | Total | Commercial | Real Estate | Residential | Consumer | Total | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Three Months Ended March 31, 2017 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance at January 1, 2017 | $ | 21,481 | $ | 18,173 | $ | 1,643 | $ | 8,511 | $ | — | $ | 49,808 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Three Months Ended March 31, 2018 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance at beginning of period | $ | 19,246 | $ | 21,436 | $ | 1,763 | $ | 7,936 | $ | 50,381 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Charge-offs | (470 | ) | (568 | ) | (414 | ) | (1,787 | ) | — | (3,239 | ) | (245 | ) | (3 | ) | (362 | ) | (2,075 | ) | (2,685 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Recoveries | 603 | 1,225 | 79 | 1,011 | — | 2,918 | 511 | 484 | 148 | 1,162 | 2,305 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Provision | 494 | (877 | ) | 428 | 302 | — | 347 | 79 | (1,121 | ) | 214 | 1,208 | 380 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance at March 31, 2017 | $ | 22,108 | $ | 17,953 | $ | 1,736 | $ | 8,037 | $ | — | $ | 49,834 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance at end of period | $ | 19,591 | $ | 20,796 | $ | 1,763 | $ | 8,231 | $ | 50,381 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Three Months Ended March 31, 2016 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance at January 1, 2016 | $ | 26,347 | $ | 15,993 | $ | 2,051 | $ | 7,842 | $ | — | $ | 52,233 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Three Months Ended March 31, 2017 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance at beginning of period | $ | 21,481 | $ | 18,173 | $ | 1,643 | $ | 8,511 | $ | 49,808 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Charge-offs | (1,527 | ) | (279 | ) | (140 | ) | (1,996 | ) | — | (3,942 | ) | (470 | ) | (568 | ) | (414 | ) | (1,787 | ) | (3,239 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Recoveries | 818 | 840 | 26 | 634 | — | 2,318 | 603 | 1,225 | 79 | 1,011 | 2,918 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Provision | (517 | ) | (783 | ) | (188 | ) | 1,579 | — | 91 | 494 | (877 | ) | 428 | 302 | 347 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance at March 31, 2016 | $ | 25,121 | $ | 15,771 | $ | 1,749 | $ | 8,059 | $ | — | $ | 50,700 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance at end of period | $ | 22,108 | $ | 17,953 | $ | 1,736 | $ | 8,037 | $ | 49,834 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table provides Old National’s recorded investment in financing receivablesloans by portfolio segment at March 31, 20172018 and December 31, 20162017 and other information regarding the allowance:
Commercial | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
(dollars in thousands) | Commercial | Real Estate | Residential | Consumer | Unallocated | Total | ||||||||||||||||||
March 31, 2017 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Allowance for loan losses: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Individually evaluated for impairment | $ | 4,980 | $ | 3,793 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 8,773 | ||||||||||||
Collectively evaluated for impairment | 17,050 | 14,141 | 1,736 | 7,704 | — | 40,631 | ||||||||||||||||||
Loans acquired with deteriorated credit quality | 78 | 19 | — | 333 | — | 430 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||
Total allowance for loan losses | $ | 22,108 | $ | 17,953 | $ | 1,736 | $ | 8,037 | $ | — | $ | 49,834 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||
Loans and leases outstanding: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Individually evaluated for impairment | $ | 37,754 | $ | 49,409 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 87,163 | ||||||||||||
Collectively evaluated for impairment | 1,872,067 | 3,147,808 | 2,099,114 | 1,878,769 | — | 8,997,758 | ||||||||||||||||||
Loans acquired with deteriorated credit quality | 715 | 25,648 | 13,148 | 7,341 | — | 46,852 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||
Total loans and leases outstanding | $ | 1,910,536 | $ | 3,222,865 | $ | 2,112,262 | $ | 1,886,110 | $ | — | $ | 9,131,773 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||
December 31, 2016 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Allowance for loan losses: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Individually evaluated for impairment | $ | 4,561 | $ | 3,437 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 7,998 | ||||||||||||
Collectively evaluated for impairment | 16,838 | 14,717 | 1,643 | 8,334 | — | 41,532 | ||||||||||||||||||
Loans acquired with deteriorated credit quality | 82 | 19 | — | 177 | — | 278 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||
Total allowance for loan losses | $ | 21,481 | $ | 18,173 | $ | 1,643 | $ | 8,511 | $ | — | $ | 49,808 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||
Loans and leases outstanding: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Individually evaluated for impairment | $ | 45,960 | $ | 57,230 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 103,190 | ||||||||||||
Collectively evaluated for impairment | 1,870,289 | 3,040,849 | 2,073,950 | 1,866,815 | — | 8,851,903 | ||||||||||||||||||
Loans acquired with deteriorated credit quality | 850 | 32,774 | 13,580 | 8,215 | — | 55,419 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||
Total loans and leases outstanding | $ | 1,917,099 | $ | 3,130,853 | $ | 2,087,530 | $ | 1,875,030 | $ | — | $ | 9,010,512 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands) March 31, 2018 Allowance for loan losses: Individually evaluated for impairment Collectively evaluated for impairment Loans acquired with deteriorated credit quality Total allowance for loan losses Loans and leases outstanding: Individually evaluated for impairment Collectively evaluated for impairment Loans acquired with deteriorated credit quality Total loans and leases outstanding December 31, 2017 Allowance for loan losses: Individually evaluated for impairment Collectively evaluated for impairment Loans acquired with deteriorated credit quality Total allowance for loan losses Loans and leases outstanding: Individually evaluated for impairment Collectively evaluated for impairment Loans acquired with deteriorated credit quality Total loans and leases outstanding Commercial Commercial Real Estate Residential Consumer Total $ 4,024 $ 6,054 $ — $ — $ 10,078 15,557 14,742 1,763 8,069 40,131 10 — — 162 172 $ 19,591 $ 20,796 $ 1,763 $ 8,231 $ 50,381 $ 30,092 $ 64,693 $ — $ — $ 94,785 2,776,738 4,364,309 2,147,693 1,813,910 11,102,650 4,799 20,978 10,839 4,631 41,247 $ 2,811,629 $ 4,449,980 $ 2,158,532 $ 1,818,541 $ 11,238,682 $ 3,424 $ 6,654 $ — $ — $ 10,078 15,790 14,782 1,763 7,802 40,137 32 — — 134 166 $ 19,246 $ 21,436 $ 1,763 $ 7,936 $ 50,381 $ 26,270 $ 66,061 $ — $ — $ 92,331 2,685,847 4,266,665 2,155,750 1,874,002 10,982,264 5,152 21,826 11,303 5,245 43,526 $ 2,717,269 $ 4,354,552 $ 2,167,053 $ 1,879,247 $ 11,118,121
Credit Quality
Old National’s management monitors the credit quality of its financing receivablesloans in anon-going manner. Internally, management assigns an asset quality rating (“AQR”)AQR to eachnon-homogeneous commercial and commercial real estate loan in the portfolio, with the exception of certain FICO-scored small business loans. The primary determinants of the AQR are based upon the reliability of the primary source of repayment and the past, present, and projected financial condition of the borrower. The AQR will also consider current industry conditions. Major factors used in determining the AQR can vary based on the nature of the loan, but commonly include factors such as debt service coverage, internal cash flow, liquidity, leverage, operating performance, debt burden, FICO scores, occupancy, interest rate sensitivity, and expense burden. Old National uses the following definitions for risk ratings:
Criticized. Special mention loans that have a potential weakness that deserves management’s close attention. If left uncorrected, these potential weaknesses may result in deterioration of the repayment prospects for the loan or of the institution’s credit position at some future date.
Classified – Substandard. Loans classified as substandard are inadequately protected by the current net worth and paying capacity of the obligor or of the collateral pledged, if any. Loans so classified have a well-defined weakness or weaknesses that jeopardize the liquidation of the debt. They are characterized by the distinct possibility that the institution will sustain some loss if the deficiencies are not corrected.
Classified – Nonaccrual. Loans classified as nonaccrual have all the weaknesses inherent in those classified as substandard, with the added characteristic that the weaknesses make collection in full, on the basis of currently existing facts, conditions, and values, in doubt.
Classified – Doubtful. Loans classified as doubtful have all the weaknesses inherent in those classified as nonaccrual, with the added characteristic that the weaknesses make collection in full, on the basis of currently existing facts, conditions, and values, highly questionable and improbable.
Pass rated loans are those loans that are other than criticized, classified – substandard, classified – nonaccrual, or classified – doubtful.
The risk category of commercial and commercial real estate loans by class of loans at March 31, 20172018 and December 31, 20162017 was as follows:
(dollars in thousands) | Commercial | Commercial | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Real Estate - | Real Estate - | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Corporate Credit Exposure | Commercial | Construction | Other | |||||||||||||||||||||
Credit Risk Profile by | March 31, | December 31, | March 31, | December 31, | March 31, | December 31, | ||||||||||||||||||
Internally Assigned Grade | 2017 | 2016 | 2017 | 2016 | 2017 | 2016 | ||||||||||||||||||
Grade: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pass | $ | 1,796,685 | $ | 1,750,923 | $ | 357,055 | $ | 347,325 | $ | 2,699,177 | $ | 2,669,890 | ||||||||||||
Criticized | 40,599 | 45,614 | — | 9,258 | 55,282 | 40,590 | ||||||||||||||||||
Classified - substandard | 36,566 | 63,978 | — | 49 | 62,960 | 19,715 | ||||||||||||||||||
Classified - nonaccrual | 33,533 | 53,062 | — | 1,170 | 38,560 | 33,833 | ||||||||||||||||||
Classified - doubtful | 3,153 | 3,522 | — | — | 9,831 | 9,023 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||
Total | $ | 1,910,536 | $ | 1,917,099 | $ | 357,055 | $ | 357,802 | $ | 2,865,810 | $ | 2,773,051 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grade: Pass Criticized Classified - substandard Classified - nonaccrual Classified - doubtful Total (dollars in thousands) Commercial Commercial Real Estate - Real Estate - Corporate Credit Exposure Commercial Construction Other Credit Risk Profile by March 31, December 31, March 31, December 31, March 31, December 31, Internally Assigned Grade 2018 2017 2018 2017 2018 2017 $ 2,657,943 $ 2,577,824 $ 335,761 $ 357,438 $ 3,886,508 $ 3,762,896 78,612 74,876 14,782 14,758 81,479 98,451 41,899 37,367 — — 71,047 58,584 30,823 24,798 905 2,110 31,364 30,108 2,352 2,404 — — 28,134 30,207 $ 2,811,629 $ 2,717,269 $ 351,448 $ 374,306 $ 4,098,532 $ 3,980,246
Old National considers the performance of the loan portfolio and its impact on the allowance for loan losses. For residential and consumer loan classes, Old National also evaluates credit quality based on the aging status of the loan and by payment activity. The following table presents the recorded investment in residential and consumer loans based on payment activity at March 31, 20172018 and December 31, 2016:2017:
Consumer | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(dollars in thousands) | Consumer | Residential | Home Equity | Auto | Other | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Home | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Residential | Equity | Auto | Other | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
March 31, 2017 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
March 31, 2018 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Performing | $ | 2,094,446 | $ | 460,295 | $ | 1,197,713 | $ | 215,618 | $ | 2,137,395 | $ | 482,214 | $ | 1,114,511 | $ | 209,235 | ||||||||||||||||
Nonperforming | 17,816 | 4,616 | 1,867 | 6,001 | 21,137 | 5,023 | 2,515 | 5,043 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total | $ | 2,112,262 | $ | 464,911 | $ | 1,199,580 | $ | 221,619 | $ | 2,158,532 | $ | 487,237 | $ | 1,117,026 | $ | 214,278 | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
December 31, 2016 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
December 31, 2017 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Performing | $ | 2,069,856 | $ | 472,008 | $ | 1,166,114 | $ | 223,786 | $ | 2,144,882 | $ | 502,322 | $ | 1,145,977 | $ | 217,819 | ||||||||||||||||
Nonperforming | 17,674 | 4,431 | 1,623 | 7,068 | 22,171 | 5,185 | 2,695 | 5,249 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total | $ | 2,087,530 | $ | 476,439 | $ | 1,167,737 | $ | 230,854 | $ | 2,167,053 | $ | 507,507 | $ | 1,148,672 | $ | 223,068 | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impaired Loans
Large commercial credits are subject to individual evaluation for impairment. Retail credits and other small balance credits that are part of a homogeneous group are not tested for individual impairment unless they are modified as a troubled debt restructuring.TDR. A loan is considered impaired when it is probable that contractual interest and principal payments will not be collected either for the amounts or by the dates as scheduled in the loan agreement. If a loan is impaired, a portion of the allowance is allocated so that the loan is reported net, at the present value of estimated cash flows using the loan’s existing rate or at the fair value of collateral if repayment is expected solely from the collateral. Old National’s policy, for all but purchased credit impairedPCI loans, is to recognize interest income on impaired loans unless the loan is placed on nonaccrual status.
The following table shows Old National’s impaired loans at March 31, 20172018 and December 31, 2016,2017, respectively. Only purchased loans that have experienced subsequent impairment since the date acquired are included in the table below.
Unpaid | Unpaid | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Recorded | Principal | Related | Recorded | Principal | Related | |||||||||||||||||||
(dollars in thousands) | Investment | Balance | Allowance | Investment | Balance | Allowance | ||||||||||||||||||
March 31, 2017 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
March 31, 2018 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
With no related allowance recorded: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial | $ | 28,559 | $ | 29,659 | $ | — | $ | 20,869 | $ | 21,656 | $ | — | ||||||||||||
Commercial Real Estate - Other | 34,755 | 36,272 | — | 42,923 | 44,688 | — | ||||||||||||||||||
Residential | 2,253 | 2,274 | — | 2,107 | 2,128 | — | ||||||||||||||||||
Consumer | 1,847 | 2,089 | — | 2,000 | 2,436 | — | ||||||||||||||||||
With an allowance recorded: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial | 9,195 | 9,214 | 4,980 | 9,223 | 9,276 | 4,024 | ||||||||||||||||||
Commercial Real Estate - Construction | 905 | 1,371 | 401 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial Real Estate - Other | 14,654 | 15,200 | 3,793 | 20,865 | 21,081 | 5,653 | ||||||||||||||||||
Residential | 1,154 | 1,154 | 58 | 950 | 950 | 48 | ||||||||||||||||||
Consumer | 2,081 | 2,081 | 104 | 2,022 | 2,022 | 101 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||
Total | $ | 94,498 | $ | 97,943 | $ | 8,935 | $ | 101,864 | $ | 105,608 | $ | 10,227 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||
December 31, 2016 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
December 31, 2017 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
With no related allowance recorded: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial | $ | 29,001 | $ | 29,634 | $ | — | $ | 20,557 | $ | 21,483 | $ | — | ||||||||||||
Commercial Real Estate - Other | 30,585 | 32,413 | — | 38,678 | 44,564 | — | ||||||||||||||||||
Residential | 1,610 | 1,631 | — | 2,443 | 2,464 | — | ||||||||||||||||||
Consumer | 827 | 946 | — | 1,685 | 2,105 | — | ||||||||||||||||||
With an allowance recorded: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial | 16,959 | 17,283 | 4,561 | 5,713 | 5,713 | 3,424 | ||||||||||||||||||
Commercial Real Estate - Construction | 905 | 1,371 | 401 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial Real Estate - Other | 26,645 | 27,177 | 3,437 | 26,478 | 26,902 | 6,253 | ||||||||||||||||||
Residential | 1,081 | 1,081 | 54 | 870 | 870 | 44 | ||||||||||||||||||
Consumer | 1,924 | 1,924 | 96 | 2,211 | 2,228 | 110 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||
Total | $ | 108,632 | $ | 112,089 | $ | 8,148 | $ | 99,540 | $ | 107,700 | $ | 10,232 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
The average balance of impaired loans during the three months ended March 31, 20172018 and 20162017 are included in the table below.
Three Months Ended | ||||||||
March 31, | ||||||||
(dollars in thousands) | 2017 | 2016 | ||||||
Average Recorded Investment | ||||||||
With no related allowance recorded: | ||||||||
Commercial | $ | 28,780 | $ | 34,085 | ||||
Commercial Real Estate - Other | 32,671 | 27,149 | ||||||
Residential | 1,931 | 1,362 | ||||||
Consumer | 1,377 | 1,019 | ||||||
With an allowance recorded: | ||||||||
Commercial | 8,743 | 18,283 | ||||||
Commercial Real Estate - Construction | — | 234 | ||||||
Commercial Real Estate - Other | 20,650 | 14,097 | ||||||
Residential | 1,118 | 1,001 | ||||||
Consumer | 2,003 | 2,651 | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Total | $ | 97,273 | $ | 99,881 | ||||
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended | ||||||||
March 31, | ||||||||
(dollars in thousands) | 2018 | 2017 | ||||||
Average Recorded Investment | ||||||||
With no related allowance recorded: | ||||||||
Commercial | $ | 20,714 | $ | 28,780 | ||||
Commercial Real Estate - Other | 40,801 | 32,671 | ||||||
Residential | 2,275 | 1,931 | ||||||
Consumer | 1,842 | 1,377 | ||||||
With an allowance recorded: | ||||||||
Commercial | 7,468 | 8,743 | ||||||
Commercial Real Estate - Construction | 905 | — | ||||||
Commercial Real Estate - Other | 23,672 | 20,650 | ||||||
Residential | 910 | 1,118 | ||||||
Consumer | 2,117 | 2,003 | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Total | $ | 100,704 | $ | 97,273 | ||||
|
|
|
|
The CompanyOld National does not record interest on nonaccrual loans until principal is recovered. Interest income recognized on impaired loans during the three months ended March 31, 20172018 and 20162017 was immaterial.
For all loan classes, a loan is generally placed on nonaccrual status when principal or interest becomes 90 days past due unless it is well secured and in the process of collection, or earlier when concern exists as to the ultimate collectibility of principal or interest. Interest accrued during the current year on such loans is reversed against earnings. Interest accrued in the prior year, if any, is charged to the allowance for loan losses. Cash interest received on these loans is applied to the principal balance until the principal is recovered or until the loan returns to accrual status. Loans may be returned to accrual status when all the principal and interest amounts contractually due are brought current, remain current for a prescribed period, and future payments are reasonably assured.
Loans accounted for under FASB ASC Topic310-30 accrue interest, even though they may be contractually past due, as any nonpayment of contractual principal or interest is considered in the periodicre-estimation of expected cash flows and is included in the resulting recognition of current period loan loss provision or prospective yield adjustments.
Old National’s past due financing receivables at March 31, 20172018 and December 31, 20162017 were as follows:
Recorded | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investment > | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
30-59 Days | 60-89 Days | 90 Days and | Total | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(dollars in thousands) | Past Due | Past Due | Accruing | Nonaccrual | Past Due | Current | 30-59 Days Past Due | 60-89 Days Past Due | Past Due 90 Days or More and Accruing | Nonaccrual | Total Past Due | Current | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
March 31, 2017 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
March 31, 2018 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial | $ | 512 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 36,686 | $ | 37,198 | $ | 1,873,338 | $ | 1,068 | $ | 195 | $ | 10 | $ | 33,175 | $ | 34,448 | $ | 2,777,181 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial Real Estate: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Construction | — | — | — | — | — | 357,055 | — | — | — | 905 | 905 | 350,543 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other | 899 | — | 80 | 48,391 | 49,370 | 2,816,440 | 1,779 | 932 | — | 59,498 | 62,209 | 4,036,323 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Residential | 16,351 | 472 | 2 | 17,816 | 34,641 | 2,077,621 | 21,071 | 909 | 16 | 21,137 | 43,133 | 2,115,399 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Consumer: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Home equity | 1,185 | 544 | — | 4,616 | 6,345 | 458,566 | 1,965 | 183 | 16 | 5,023 | 7,187 | 480,050 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Auto | 3,379 | 643 | 185 | 1,867 | 6,074 | 1,193,506 | 4,904 | 1,139 | 214 | 2,515 | 8,772 | 1,108,255 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other | 2,538 | 2,141 | 114 | 6,001 | 10,794 | 210,825 | 2,121 | 1,014 | 71 | 5,043 | 8,249 | 206,028 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total loans | $ | 24,864 | $ | 3,800 | $ | 381 | $ | 115,377 | $ | 144,422 | $ | 8,987,351 | $ | 32,908 | $ | 4,372 | $ | 327 | $ | 127,296 | $ | 164,903 | $ | 11,073,779 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
December 31, 2016 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
December 31, 2017 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial | $ | 847 | $ | 279 | $ | 23 | $ | 56,585 | $ | 57,734 | $ | 1,859,365 | $ | 986 | $ | 360 | $ | 144 | $ | 27,202 | $ | 28,692 | $ | 2,688,577 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial Real Estate: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Construction | — | — | — | 1,170 | 1,170 | 356,632 | — | — | — | 2,110 | 2,110 | 372,196 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other | 1,652 | 150 | — | 42,856 | 44,658 | 2,728,393 | 2,247 | 89 | — | 60,315 | 62,651 | 3,917,595 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Residential | 17,786 | 3,770 | 2 | 17,674 | 39,232 | 2,048,298 | 18,948 | 3,416 | — | 22,171 | 44,535 | 2,122,518 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Consumer: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Home equity | 1,511 | 423 | — | 4,431 | 6,365 | 470,074 | 1,467 | 230 | 68 | 5,185 | 6,950 | 500,557 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Auto | 5,903 | 1,037 | 242 | 1,623 | 8,805 | 1,158,932 | 6,487 | 1,402 | 532 | 2,695 | 11,116 | 1,137,556 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other | 3,561 | 1,919 | 61 | 7,068 | 12,609 | 218,245 | 3,967 | 1,514 | 150 | 5,249 | 10,880 | 212,188 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total loans | $ | 31,260 | $ | 7,578 | $ | 328 | $ | 131,407 | $ | 170,573 | $ | 8,839,939 | $ | 34,102 | $ | 7,011 | $ | 894 | $ | 124,927 | $ | 166,934 | $ | 10,951,187 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loan Participations
Old National has loan participations, which qualify as participating interests, with other financial institutions. At March 31, 2017,2018, these loans totaled $464.6$580.2 million, of which $237.5$301.4 million had been sold to other financial institutions and $227.1$278.8 million was retained by Old National. The loan participations convey proportionate ownership rights with equal priority to each participating interest holder,holder; involve no recourse (other than ordinary representations and warranties) to, or subordination by, any participating interest holder,holder; all cash flows are divided among the participating interest holders in proportion to each holder’s share of ownership,ownership; and no holder has the right to pledge the entire financial asset unless all participating interest holders agree.
Troubled Debt Restructurings
Old National may choose to restructure the contractual terms of certain loans. The decision to restructure a loan, versus aggressively enforcing the collection of the loan, may benefit Old National by increasing the ultimate probability of collection.
Any loans that are modified are reviewed by Old National to identify if a troubled debt restructuring (“TDR”)TDR has occurred, which is when for economic or legal reasons related to a borrower’s financial difficulties, theOld National Bank grants a concession to the borrower that it would not otherwise consider. Terms may be modified to fit the ability of the borrower to repay in line with its current financial status. The modification of the terms of such loans include one or a combination of the following: a reduction of the stated interest rate of the loan, an extension of the maturity date at a stated rate of interest lower than the current market rate of new debt with similar risk, or a permanent reduction of the recorded investment of the loan.
Loans modified in a TDR are typically placed on nonaccrual status until we determine the future collection of principal and interest is reasonably assured, which generally requires that the borrower demonstrate a period of performance according to the restructured terms for six months.
If we are unable to resolve a nonperforming loan issue, the credit will be charged off when it is apparent there will be a loss. For large commercial type loans, each relationship is individually analyzed for evidence of apparent loss based on quantitative benchmarks or subjectively based upon certain events or particular circumstances. Generally, Old National charges off small commercial loans scored through our small business credit center with contractual balances under $250,000 that have been placed on nonaccrual status or becameare 90 days or more delinquent without regard to theand do not have adequate collateral position.support. For residential and consumer loans, a charge off is recorded at the time foreclosure is initiated or when the loan becomes 120 to 180 days past due, whichever is earlier.
For commercial TDRs, an allocated reserve is established within the allowance for loan losses for the difference between the carrying value of the loan and its computed value. To determine the value of the loan, one of the following methods is selected: (1) the present value of expected cash flows discounted at the loan’s original effective interest rate, (2) the loan’s observable market price, or (3) the fair value of the collateral value, if the loan is collateral dependent. The allocated reserve is established as the difference between the carrying value of the loan and the collectable value. If there are significant changes in the amount or timing of the loan’s expected future cash flows, impairment is recalculated and the valuation allowance is adjusted accordingly.
When a residential or consumer loan is identified as a troubled debt restructuring,TDR, the loan is typically written down to its collateral value less selling costs.
The following table presents activity in TDRs for the three months ended March 31, 20172018 and 2016:2017:
Commercial | ||||||||||||||||||||
(dollars in thousands) | Commercial | Real Estate | Residential | Consumer | Total | |||||||||||||||
Three Months Ended March 31, 2017 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Balance at January 1, 2017 | $ | 16,802 | $ | 18,327 | $ | 2,985 | $ | 2,602 | $ | 40,716 | ||||||||||
(Charge-offs)/recoveries | 35 | 355 | — | (100 | ) | 290 | ||||||||||||||
Payments | (3,827 | ) | (1,751 | ) | (142 | ) | (508 | ) | (6,228 | ) | ||||||||||
Additions | 9,442 | — | 564 | 1,924 | 11,930 | |||||||||||||||
Interest collected on nonaccrual loans | 2,170 | 358 | — | 11 | 2,539 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
Balance at March 31, 2017 | $ | 24,622 | $ | 17,289 | $ | 3,407 | $ | 3,929 | $ | 49,247 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
Three Months Ended March 31, 2016 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Balance at January 1, 2016 | $ | 23,354 | $ | 14,602 | $ | 2,693 | $ | 3,602 | $ | 44,251 | ||||||||||
(Charge-offs)/recoveries | (826 | ) | 62 | 32 | (18 | ) | (750 | ) | ||||||||||||
Payments | (3,565 | ) | (1,106 | ) | (348 | ) | (309 | ) | (5,328 | ) | ||||||||||
Additions | 1,542 | 9,476 | 133 | 385 | 11,536 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
Balance at March 31, 2016 | $ | 20,505 | $ | 23,034 | $ | 2,510 | $ | 3,660 | $ | 49,709 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands) Three Months Ended March 31, 2018 Balance at beginning of period (Charge-offs)/recoveries Payments Additions Interest collected on nonaccrual loans Balance at end of period Three Months Ended March 31, 2017 Balance at beginning of period (Charge-offs)/recoveries Payments Additions Interest collected on nonaccrual loans Balance at end of period Commercial Commercial Real Estate Residential Consumer Total $ 12,088 $ 34,705 $ 3,315 $ 3,895 $ 54,003 (129 ) (10 ) 23 298 182 (476 ) (495 ) (276 ) (537 ) (1,784 ) 539 566 — 432 1,537 (104 ) (278 ) (4 ) (68 ) (454 ) $ 11,918 $ 34,488 $ 3,058 $ 4,020 $ 53,484 $ 16,802 $ 18,327 $ 2,985 $ 2,602 $ 40,716 35 355 — (100 ) 290 (3,827 ) (1,751 ) (142 ) (508 ) (6,228 ) 9,442 — 564 1,924 11,930 2,170 358 — 11 2,539 $ 24,622 $ 17,289 $ 3,407 $ 3,929 $ 49,247
Approximately $34.2$36.9 million of the TDRs at March 31, 20172018 were included with nonaccrual loans, compared to $26.3$34.0 million of the TDRs at December 31, 2016.2017. Old National has allocated specific reserves to customers whose loan terms have been modified in TDRs totaling $5.0$5.9 million at March 31, 20172018 and $4.0$5.7 million at December 31, 2016.2017. At March 31, 2017,2018, Old National had committed to lend an additional $5.5$4.6 million to customers with outstanding loans that are classified as TDRs.
Thepre-modification and post-modification outstanding recorded investments of loans modified as TDRs during the three months ended March 31, 20172018 and 20162017 are the same except for when the loan modifications involve the forgiveness of principal. The following table presents loans by class modified as TDRs that occurred during the three months ended March 31, 20172018 and 2016:2017:
Pre-modification | Post-modification | Pre-modification | Post-modification | |||||||||||||||||||||
Number | Outstanding Recorded | Outstanding Recorded | Number | Outstanding Recorded | Outstanding Recorded | |||||||||||||||||||
(dollars in thousands) | of Loans | Investment | Investment | of Loans | Investment | Investment | ||||||||||||||||||
Three Months Ended March 31, 2018 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
TDR: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial | 1 | $ | 539 | $ | 539 | |||||||||||||||||||
Commercial Real Estate - Other | 1 | 566 | 566 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Consumer | 1 | 432 | 432 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
Total | 3 | $ | 1,537 | $ | 1,537 | |||||||||||||||||||
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
Three Months Ended March 31, 2017 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Troubled Debt Restructuring: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
TDR: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial | 6 | $ | 9,442 | $ | 9,442 | 6 | $ | 9,442 | $ | 9,442 | ||||||||||||||
Residential | 3 | 564 | 564 | 3 | 564 | 564 | ||||||||||||||||||
Consumer | 5 | 1,924 | 1,924 | 5 | 1,924 | 1,924 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||
Total | 14 | $ | 11,930 | $ | 11,930 | 14 | $ | 11,930 | $ | 11,930 | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||
Three Months Ended March 31, 2016 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Troubled Debt Restructuring: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial | 10 | $ | 1,542 | $ | 1,542 | |||||||||||||||||||
Commercial Real Estate - Other | 7 | 9,476 | 9,476 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Residential | 1 | 133 | 133 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Consumer | 8 | 385 | 385 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
Total | 26 | $ | 11,536 | $ | 11,536 | |||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
The TDRs that occurred during the three months ended March 31, 2018 did not change the allowance for loan losses and resulted in no charge-offs during the three months ended March 31, 2018. The TDRs that occurred during the three months ended March 31, 2017 decreased the allowance for loan losses by $0.1 million due to a change in collateral position on a large commercial loan and resulted in no charge-offs during the three months ended March 31, 2017. The TDRs that occurred during the three months ended March 31, 2016 increased the allowance for loan losses by $0.2 million and resulted in $0.6 million of charge-offs.
A loan is considered to be in payment default once it is 90 days contractually past due under the modified terms.
There were no loans that were modified as TDRs within the preceding twelve months, and for which there was a payment default within twelve months following the modification were insignificant during the three months ended March 31, 2017.
There were 4 commercial loans2018 and 3 commercial real estate loans totaling $0.6 million that were modified as TDRs within the preceding twelve months, and for which there was a payment default during the three months ended March 31, 2016.2017.
The terms of certain other loans were modified during the three months ended March 31, 20172018 that did not meet the definition of a TDR. It is our process to review all classified and criticized loans that, during the period, have been renewed, have entered into a forbearance agreement, have gone from principal and interest to interest only, or have extended the maturity date. In order to determine whether a borrower is experiencing financial difficulty, an evaluation is performed of the probability that the borrower will be in payment default on its debt in the foreseeable future without the modification. The evaluation is performed under our internal underwriting policy. We also evaluate whether a concession has been granted or if we were adequately compensated through a market interest rate, additional collateral or a bona fide guarantee. We also consider whether the modification was insignificant relative to the other terms of the agreement or the delay in a payment.
Purchased credit impaired (“PCI”)PCI loans are not considered impaired until after the point at which there has been a degradation of cash flows below our expected cash flows at acquisition. If a PCI loan is subsequently modified, and meets the definition of a TDR, it will be removed from PCI accounting and accounted for as a TDR only if the PCI loan was being accounted for individually. If the purchased credit impairedPCI loan is being accounted for as part of a pool, it will not be removed from the pool. As of March 31, 2017,2018, it has not been necessary to remove any loans from PCI accounting.
In general, once a modified loan is considered a TDR, the loan will always be considered a TDR, and therefore impaired, until it is paid in full, otherwise settled, sold or charged off. However, guidance also permits for loans to be removed from TDR status when subsequently restructured under these circumstances: (1) at the time of the subsequent restructuring, the borrower is not experiencing financial difficulties, and this is documented by a current credit evaluation at the time of the restructuring, (2) under the terms of the subsequent restructuring agreement, the institution has granted no concession to the borrower; and (3) the subsequent restructuring agreement includes market terms that are no less favorable than those that would be offered for a comparable new loan. For loans
subsequently restructured that have cumulative principal forgiveness, the loan should continue to be measured in accordance with ASC310-10, “ReceivablesReceivables – Overall”Overall. However, consistent with ASC310-40-50-2, “TroubledTroubled Debt Restructurings by Creditors, Creditor Disclosure of Troubled Debt Restructurings”, the loan would not be required to be reported in the years following the restructuring if the subsequent restructuring meets both of these criteria: (1) has an interest rate at the time of the subsequent restructuring that is not less than a market interest rate; and (2) is performing in compliance with its modified terms after the subsequent restructuring.
Purchased Credit Impaired Loans (“PCI”)
Purchased loans acquired in a business combination are recorded at estimated fair value on their purchase date with no carryover of the related allowance for loan and lease losses. In determining the estimated fair value of purchased loans, management considers a number of factors including, among others, the remaining life of the acquired loans, estimated prepayments, estimated loss ratios, estimated value of the underlying collateral, and net present value of cash flows expected to be received. Purchased loans are accounted for in accordance with guidance for certain loans acquired in a transfer (ASC310-30), when the loans have evidence of credit deterioration since origination and it is probable at the date of acquisition that the acquirer will not collect all contractually required principal and interest payments. The difference between contractually required payments and the cash flows expected to be collected at acquisition is referred to as thenon-accretable difference. Subsequent decreases to the expected cash flows will generally result in a provision for loan and lease losses. Subsequent increases in expected cash flows will result in a reversal of the provision for loan losses to the extent of prior charges and then an adjustment to accretable yield, which would have a positive impact on interest income.
Old National has purchased loans for which there was, at acquisition, evidence of deterioration of credit quality since origination and it was probable, at acquisition, that all contractually required payments would not be collected. For these loans that meet the criteria of ASC310-30 treatment, the carrying amount was as follows:
March 31, | December 31, | March 31, | December 31, | |||||||||||||
(dollars in thousands) | 2017 | 2016 | 2018 | 2017 | ||||||||||||
Commercial | $ | 715 | $ | 850 | $ | 4,799 | $ | 5,152 | ||||||||
Commercial real estate | 25,648 | 32,774 | 20,978 | 21,826 | ||||||||||||
Residential | 13,148 | 13,580 | 10,839 | 11,303 | ||||||||||||
Consumer | 7,341 | 8,215 | 4,631 | 5,245 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||
Carrying amount | 46,852 | 55,419 | 41,247 | 43,526 | ||||||||||||
Allowance for loan losses | (430 | ) | (278 | ) | (172 | ) | (166 | ) | ||||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||
Carrying amount, net of allowance | $ | 46,422 | $ | 55,141 | $ | 41,075 | $ | 43,360 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
The outstanding balance of loans accounted for under ASC310-30, including contractual principal, interest, fees and penalties, was $255.8$230.5 million at March 31, 20172018 and $268.0$235.9 million at December 31, 2016.2017.
The accretable difference on purchasedPCI loans acquired in a business combination is the difference between the expected cash flows and the net present value of expected cash flows with such difference accreted into earnings using the effective yield method over the term of the loans. Accretion recorded as loan interest income totaled $4.7 million
during the three months ended March 31, 2017 and $8.7$4.5 million during the three months ended March 31, 2016.2018 and $4.7 million during the three months ended March 31, 2017. Improvement in cash flow expectations has resulted in a reclassification from nonaccretable difference to accretable yield as shown in the table below.
Accretable yield of purchased credit impairedPCI loans, or income expected to be collected, is as follows:
Three Months Ended | ||||||||||||||||
March 31, | ||||||||||||||||
(dollars in thousands) | 2017 | 2016 | 2018 | 2017 | ||||||||||||
Balance at January 1, | $ | 33,603 | $ | 45,310 | ||||||||||||
Balance at beginning of period | $ | 27,835 | $ | 33,603 | ||||||||||||
Accretion of income | (4,685 | ) | (8,661 | ) | (4,526 | ) | (4,685 | ) | ||||||||
Reclassifications from (to) nonaccretable difference | 610 | 2,870 | 1,379 | 610 | ||||||||||||
Disposals/other adjustments | 6 | 367 | 4 | 6 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||
Balance at March 31, | $ | 29,534 | $ | 39,886 | ||||||||||||
Balance at end of period | $ | 24,692 | $ | 29,534 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
Included in Old National’s allowance for loan losses is $0.4$0.2 million related to the purchased loans disclosed above at March 31, 2017, compared to $0.3 million at2018 and December 31, 2016.2017.
PCI loans purchased during 20162017 for which it was probable at acquisition that all contractually required payments would not be collected were as follows:
(dollars in thousands) | Anchor (1) | Anchor (MN) (1) | ||||||
Contractually required payments | $ | 29,544 | $ | 16,898 | ||||
Nonaccretable difference | (6,153 | ) | (4,787 | ) | ||||
|
| |||||||
Cash flows expected to be collected at acquisition | 23,391 | 12,111 | ||||||
Accretable yield | (3,217 | ) | (1,556 | ) | ||||
|
| |||||||
Fair value of acquired loans at acquisition | $ | 20,174 | $ | 10,555 | ||||
|
|
(1) | Old National acquired Anchor (MN) effective |
Income would not be recognized on certain purchased loans if Old National could not reasonably estimate cash flows to be collected. Old National had no purchased loans for which it could not reasonably estimate cash flows to be collected.
NOTE 9 – OTHER REAL ESTATE OWNED
The following table presents activity in other real estate owned for the three months ended March 31, 20172018 and 2016:2017:
Three Months Ended | ||||||||||||||||
March 31, | ||||||||||||||||
(dollars in thousands) | 2017 | 2016 | 2018 | 2017 | ||||||||||||
Balance at January 1, | $ | 18,546 | $ | 12,498 | ||||||||||||
Balance at beginning of period | $ | 8,810 | $ | 18,546 | ||||||||||||
Additions | 291 | 2,566 | 550 | 291 | ||||||||||||
Sales | (5,420 | ) | (1,206 | ) | (2,351 | ) | (5,420 | ) | ||||||||
Impairment | (870 | ) | (336 | ) | (274 | ) | (870 | ) | ||||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||
Balance (1) at March 31, | $ | 12,547 | $ | 13,522 | ||||||||||||
Balance at end of period (1) | $ | 6,735 | $ | 12,547 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
(1) | Includes repossessed personal property of $0.3 million at March 31, |
At March 31, 2017,2018, foreclosed residential real estate property included in the table above totaled $1.1$1.0 million. At March 31, 2017,2018, consumer mortgage loans collateralized by residential real property that were in the process of foreclosure totaled $3.7$6.2 million.
Other real estate owned that was covered by loss share arrangements totaled $6.5 million at March 31, 2016 and was included in other real estate owned in the table above and on the balance sheet for that period. Old National entered into an agreement with the FDIC on June 22, 2016 to terminate its loss share agreements.
NOTE 10 – PREMISES AND EQUIPMENT
The composition of premises and equipment at March 31, 20172018 and December 31, 20162017 was as follows:
March 31, | December 31, | March 31, | December 31, | |||||||||||||
(dollars in thousands) | 2017 | 2016 | 2018 | 2017 | ||||||||||||
Land | $ | 69,484 | $ | 71,769 | $ | 71,618 | $ | 73,046 | ||||||||
Buildings | 317,582 | 322,165 | 342,757 | 343,833 | ||||||||||||
Furniture, fixtures, and equipment | 100,489 | 102,631 | 95,729 | 94,254 | ||||||||||||
Leasehold improvements | 27,894 | 28,555 | 39,715 | 38,918 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||
Total | 515,449 | 525,120 | 549,819 | 550,051 | ||||||||||||
Accumulated depreciation | (94,583 | ) | (95,498 | ) | (96,216 | ) | (91,977 | ) | ||||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||
Premises and equipment, net | $ | 420,866 | $ | 429,622 | $ | 453,603 | $ | 458,074 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
Depreciation expense was $5.8 million for the three months ended March 31, 2018, compared to $5.2 million for the three months ended March 31, 2017, compared to $3.5 million for the three months ended March 31, 2016.2017.
Operating Leases
Old National rents certain premises and equipment under operating leases, which expire at various dates. Many of these leases require the payment of property taxes, insurance premiums, maintenance, and other costs. In some cases, rentals are subject to increase in relation to acost-of-living index. The leases have original terms ranging from less than one yeartwo years and six months to twenty-fourtwenty-five years, and Old National has the right, at its option, to extend the terms of certain leases for four additional successive terms of five years. Old National does not have any materialsub-lease agreements. Rent expense was $4.4 million for the three months ended March 31, 2018, compared to $3.9 million for the three months ended March 31, 2017, compared to $6.3 million for the three months ended March 31, 2016.2017.
Old National had deferred gains remaining associated with prior sale leaseback transactions totaling $9.7$7.7 million at March 31, 20172018 and $10.3$8.2 million at December 31, 2016.2017. The gains will be recognized over the remaining term of the leases. The leases had original terms ranging from five to twenty-four years.
Capital Leases
Old National leases atwo branch buildingbuildings and certain equipment under capital leases. See Note 16 to the consolidated financial statements for detail regarding these leases.
NOTE 11 -– GOODWILL AND OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS
The following table shows the changes in the carrying amount of goodwill for the three months ended March 31, 20172018 and 2016:2017:
(dollars in thousands) | 2017 | 2016 | ||||||
Balance at January 1, | $ | 655,018 | $ | 584,634 | ||||
Acquisitions | — | — | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Balance at March 31, | $ | 655,018 | $ | 584,634 | ||||
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended | ||||||||
March 31, | ||||||||
(dollars in thousands) | 2018 | 2017 | ||||||
Balance at beginning of period | $ | 828,051 | $ | 655,018 | ||||
Acquisition adjustments | 753 | — | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Balance at end of period | $ | 828,804 | $ | 655,018 | ||||
|
|
|
|
Goodwill is reviewed annually for impairment. Old National completed its most recentNo events or circumstances since the August 31, 2017 annual goodwill impairment test as of August 31, 2016 and concludedwere noted that based on current events and circumstances,would indicate it is notwas more likely than not thata goodwill impairment exists. During the carrying valuefirst quarter of 2018, Old National recorded a $0.8 million increase to goodwill exceeds fair value.associated with the acquisition of Anchor (MN).
The gross carrying amount and accumulated amortization of other intangible assets at March 31, 20172018 and December 31, 20162017 were as follows:
Gross | Accumulated | Net | Gross | Accumulated | Net | |||||||||||||||||||
Carrying | Amortization | Carrying | Carrying | Amortization | Carrying | |||||||||||||||||||
(dollars in thousands) | Amount | and Impairment | Amount | Amount | and Impairment | Amount | ||||||||||||||||||
March 31, 2017 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amortized intangible assets: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
March 31, 2018 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Core deposit | $ | 108,268 | $ | (66,037 | ) | $ | 42,231 | |||||||||||||||||
Customer trust relationships | 16,547 | (9,945 | ) | 6,602 | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
Total intangible assets | $ | 124,815 | $ | (75,982 | ) | $ | 48,833 | |||||||||||||||||
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
December 31, 2017 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Core deposit | $ | 81,663 | $ | (55,671 | ) | $ | 25,992 | $ | 108,923 | $ | (62,874 | ) | $ | 46,049 | ||||||||||
Customer trust relationships | 16,547 | (8,216 | ) | 8,331 | 16,547 | (9,533 | ) | 7,014 | ||||||||||||||||
Customer loan relationships | 4,413 | (4,079 | ) | 334 | 4,413 | (4,380 | ) | 33 | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||
Total intangible assets | $ | 102,623 | $ | (67,966 | ) | $ | 34,657 | $ | 129,883 | $ | (76,787 | ) | $ | 53,096 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||
December 31, 2016 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amortized intangible assets: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Core deposit | $ | 81,663 | $ | (53,214 | ) | $ | 28,449 | |||||||||||||||||
Customer trust relationships | 16,547 | (7,753 | ) | 8,794 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Customer loan relationships | 4,413 | (3,979 | ) | 434 | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
Total intangible assets | $ | 102,623 | $ | (64,946 | ) | $ | 37,677 | |||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
Other intangible assets consist of core deposit intangibles and customer relationship intangibles and are being amortized primarily on an accelerated basis over their estimated useful lives, generally over a period of 5 to 15 years. During the first quarter of 2018, Old National recorded a $0.7 million decrease to core deposit intangibles related to the updated valuation associated with the acquisition of Anchor (MN).
Old National reviews other intangible assets for possible impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that carrying amounts may not be recoverable. No impairment charges were recorded during the three months ended March 31, 20172018 or 2016.2017. Total amortization expense associated with intangible assets was $3.6 million for the three months ended March 31, 2018 and $3.0 million for the three months ended March 31, 2017 and $2.6 million for the three months ended March 31, 2016.2017.
Estimated amortization expense for future years is as follows:
(dollars in thousands) | ||||||||
2017 remaining | $ | 7,995 | ||||||
2018 | 8,687 | |||||||
2018 remaining | $ | 9,815 | ||||||
2019 | 6,737 | 11,010 | ||||||
2020 | 4,883 | 8,672 | ||||||
2021 | 3,111 | 6,417 | ||||||
2022 | 4,595 | |||||||
Thereafter | 3,244 | 8,324 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
Total | $ | 34,657 | $ | 48,833 | ||||
|
|
NOTE 12 – LOAN SERVICING RIGHTS
At March 31, 2017,2018, loan servicing rights derived from loans sold with servicing retained totaled $25.4$24.4 million, compared to $25.6$24.7 million at December 31, 2016.2017. Loans serviced for others are not reported as assets. The principal balance of loans serviced for others was $3.375$3.305 billion at March 31, 2017,2018, compared to $3.385$3.321 billion at December 31, 2016.2017. Approximately 99%99.6% of the loans serviced for others at March 31, 20172018 were residential mortgage loans. Custodial escrow balances maintained in connection with serviced loans were $20.8$23.9 million at March 31, 20172018 and $5.3$8.9 million at December 31, 2016.2017.
The following table summarizes the carrying values and activity related to loan servicing rights and the related valuation allowance for the three months ended March 31, 20172018 and 2016:2017:
Three Months Ended | ||||||||||||||||
March 31, | ||||||||||||||||
(dollars in thousands) | 2017 | 2016 | 2018 | 2017 | ||||||||||||
Balance at January 1, | $ | 25,629 | $ | 10,502 | ||||||||||||
Balance at beginning of period | $ | 24,690 | $ | 25,629 | ||||||||||||
Additions | 1,041 | 481 | 770 | 1,041 | ||||||||||||
Amortization | (1,174 | ) | (447 | ) | (1,060 | ) | (1,174 | ) | ||||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||
Balance before valuation allowance at March 31, | 25,496 | 10,536 | ||||||||||||||
Balance before valuation allowance at end of period | 24,400 | 25,496 | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||
Valuation allowance: | ||||||||||||||||
Balance at January 1, | (68 | ) | (34 | ) | ||||||||||||
Balance at beginning of period | (29 | ) | (68 | ) | ||||||||||||
(Additions)/recoveries | 18 | 32 | 9 | 18 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||
Balance at March 31, | (50 | ) | (2 | ) | ||||||||||||
Balance at end of period | (20 | ) | (50 | ) | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||
Loan servicing rights, net | $ | 25,446 | $ | 10,534 | $ | 24,380 | $ | 25,446 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
At March 31, 2017,2018, the fair value of servicing rights was $26.8$26.6 million, which was determined using a discount rate of 13% and a weighted average prepayment speed of 133%121% PSA. At December 31, 2016,2017, the fair value of servicing rights was $26.8$25.8 million, which was determined using a discount rate of 13% and a weighted average prepayment speed of 136%140% PSA.
NOTE 13 – QUALIFIED AFFORDABLE HOUSING PROJECTS AND OTHER TAX CREDIT INVESTMENTS
The CompanyOld National is a limited partner in severaltax-advantaged limited partnerships whose purpose is to invest in approved qualified affordable housing or other renovation or community revitalization projects. These investments are included in other assets on the balance sheet, with any unfunded commitments included with other liabilities. Certain of these assets qualify for the proportional amortization method and are amortized over the period that the Company expects to receive the tax credits, with the expense included within income tax expense on the consolidated statements of income. The other investments are accounted for under the equity method, with the expense included withinpre-tax income on the consolidated statements of income. All of the Company’s tax credit investments are evaluated for impairment at the end of each reporting period. As of March 31, 2017, the Company2018, Old National expects to recover its remaining investments through the use ofusing the tax credits that wereare generated by the investments.
The following table summarizes Old National’s investments in Low Income Housing Tax Credits (“LIHTC”), Federal Historic Tax Credits (“FHTC”),qualified affordable housing projects and Indiana Community Revitalization Enhancement District Tax Credits (“CReED”)other tax credit investments at March 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017:
(dollars in thousands) | Three Months Ended | Three Months Ended | March 31, 2018 | December 31, 2017 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
March 31, | March 31, | Unfunded | Unfunded | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
At March 31, 2017 | 2017 | 2016 | 2017 | 2016 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Accounting | Unfunded | Amortization | Tax Benefit | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investment | Method | Investment | Commitment (1) | Expense (2) | Recognized (2) | Accounting Method | Investment | Commitment (1) | Investment | Commitment | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
LIHTC and other qualifying investments | Proportional amortization | $ | 27,988 | $ | 14,875 | $ | 941 | $ | 201 | $ | (1,297 | ) | $ | (281 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
LIHTC | Proportional amortization | $ | 30,495 | $ | 11,966 | $ | 31,183 | $ | 15,553 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
FHTC | Equity | 9,835 | 7,425 | — | — | (1,520 | ) | — | Equity | 10,645 | 12,040 | 10,645 | 12,040 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
CReED | Equity | 1,504 | 1,502 | — | — | — | — | Equity | 704 | 1,502 | 704 | 1,502 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Renewable Energy | Equity | 21,633 | 19,279 | 22,364 | 19,771 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total | $ | 39,327 | $ | 23,802 | $ | 941 | $ | 201 | $ | (2,817 | ) | $ | (281 | ) | $ | 63,477 | $ | 44,787 | $ | 64,896 | $ | 48,866 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) | All commitments will be paid by |
The following table summarizes the Company’samortization expense and tax benefit recognized for Old National’s qualified affordable housing projects and other tax credit investments at Decemberfor the three months ended March 31, 2016:2018 and 2017:
Tax Expense | ||||||||||||||||||
Amortization | (Benefit) | |||||||||||||||||
(dollars in thousands) | At December 31, 2016 | Expense (1) | Recognized (2) | |||||||||||||||
Accounting | Unfunded | |||||||||||||||||
Investment | Method | Investment | Commitment | |||||||||||||||
LIHTC and other qualifying investments | Proportional amortization | $ | 29,110 | $ | 16,210 | |||||||||||||
Three Months Ended March 31, 2018 | ||||||||||||||||||
LIHTC | $ | 639 | $ | (831 | ) | |||||||||||||
FHTC | Equity | 4,434 | 3,104 | — | (1,948 | ) | ||||||||||||
CReED | Equity | 1,504 | 1,502 | |||||||||||||||
Renewable Energy | 716 | (3,415 | ) | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||
Total | $ | 35,048 | $ | 20,816 | $ | 1,355 | $ | (6,194 | ) | |||||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||
Three Months Ended March 31, 2017 | ||||||||||||||||||
LIHTC | $ | 941 | $ | (1,297 | ) | |||||||||||||
FHTC | — | (1,520 | ) | |||||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||||||
Total | $ | 941 | $ | (2,817 | ) | |||||||||||||
|
|
(1) | The amortization expense for the LIHTC investments is included in our income tax expense. The amortization expense for the FHTC and Renewable Energy tax credits is included in noninterest expense. |
(2) | All of the tax benefits recognized are included in our income tax expense. The tax benefit recognized for the FHTC and Renewable Energy investments primarily reflects the tax credits generated from the investments, and excludes the net tax expense/benefit of the investments’ income/loss. |
NOTE 14 – SECURITESSECURITIES SOLD UNDER AGREEMENTS TO REPURCHASE
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase are secured borrowings. The CompanyOld National pledges investment securities to secure these borrowings. The following table presents securities sold under agreements to repurchase and related weighted-average interest rates at or for the three months ended March 31:
(dollars in thousands) | 2017 | 2016 | 2018 | 2017 | ||||||||||||
Outstanding at March 31, | $ | 345,550 | $ | 379,060 | $ | 308,189 | $ | 345,550 | ||||||||
Average amount outstanding | 331,400 | 386,044 | 342,682 | 331,400 | ||||||||||||
Maximum amount outstanding at anymonth-end | 345,550 | 396,695 | 336,319 | 345,550 | ||||||||||||
Weighted average interest rate: | ||||||||||||||||
During the three months ended March 31, | 0.31 | % | 0.39 | % | 0.42 | % | 0.31 | % | ||||||||
At March 31, | 0.35 | 0.39 | 0.48 | 0.35 |
The following table presents the contractual maturity of our secured borrowings and class of collateral pledged:
At March 31, 2017 | At March 31, 2018 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Remaining Contractual Maturity of the Agreements | Remaining Contractual Maturity of the Agreements | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Overnight and | Up to | Greater Than | Overnight and | Up to | Greater Than | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(dollars in thousands) | Continuous | 30 Days | 30-90 Days | 90 days | Total | Continuous | 30 Days | 30-90 Days | 90 days | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Repurchase Agreements: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
U.S. Treasury and agency securities | $ | 320,550 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 25,000 | $ | 345,550 | $ | 308,189 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 308,189 | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total | $ | 320,550 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 25,000 | $ | 345,550 | $ | 308,189 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 308,189 | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The fair value of securities pledged to secure repurchase agreements may decline. The CompanyOld National has pledged securities valued at 106%130% of the gross outstanding balance of repurchase agreements at March 31, 20172018 to manage this risk.
NOTE 15 – FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK ADVANCES
The following table summarizes Old National Bank’s Federal Home Loan Bank (“FHLB”)FHLB advances at March 31, 20172018 and December 31, 2016:2017:
March 31, | December 31, | March 31, | December 31, | |||||||||||||
(dollars in thousands) | 2017 | 2016 | 2018 | 2017 | ||||||||||||
Federal Home Loan Bank advances (fixed rates 0.66% to 6.08% and variable rates 0.95% to 1.32%) maturing April 2017 to January 2025 | $ | 1,441,395 | $ | 1,353,225 | ||||||||||||
FHLB advances (fixed rates 1.49% to 6.08% and variable rates 1.80% to 1.99%) maturing April 2018 to February 2028 | $ | 1,662,603 | $ | 1,610,531 | ||||||||||||
ASC 815 fair value hedge and other basis adjustments | (365 | ) | (133 | ) | 1,576 | (952 | ) | |||||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||
Total other borrowings | $ | 1,441,030 | $ | 1,353,092 | $ | 1,664,179 | $ | 1,609,579 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
FHLB advances had weighted-average rates of 1.07%1.89% at March 31, 20172018 and 0.94%1.55% at December 31, 2016. These borrowings are collateralized by investment2017. Investment securities and residential real estate loans collateralize these borrowings up to 143%140% of outstanding debt.
Contractual maturities of FHLB advances at March 31, 20172018 were as follows:
(dollars in thousands) | ||||||||
Due in 2017 | $ | 753,818 | ||||||
Due in 2018 | 200,046 | $ | 902,032 | |||||
Due in 2019 | 202,358 | 201,902 | ||||||
Due in 2020 | 50,000 | 100,000 | ||||||
Due in 2021 | — | — | ||||||
Due in 2022 | 58,500 | |||||||
Thereafter | 235,173 | 400,169 | ||||||
ASC 815 fair value hedge and other basis adjustments | (365 | ) | 1,576 | |||||
|
| |||||||
Total | $ | 1,441,030 | $ | 1,664,179 | ||||
|
|
The following table summarizes Old National and its subsidiaries’National’s other borrowings at March 31, 20172018 and December 31, 2016:2017:
March 31, | December 31, | March 31, | December 31, | |||||||||||||
(dollars in thousands) | 2017 | 2016 | 2018 | 2017 | ||||||||||||
Old National Bancorp: | ||||||||||||||||
Senior unsecured bank notes (fixed rate 4.125%) maturing August 2024 | $ | 175,000 | $ | 175,000 | ||||||||||||
Unamortized debt issuance costs related to Senior unsecured bank notes | (1,143 | ) | (1,182 | ) | ||||||||||||
Junior subordinated debentures (variable rates of 2.49% to 2.90%) maturing March 2035 to September 2037 | 45,000 | 45,000 | ||||||||||||||
Senior unsecured notes (fixed rate 4.125%) maturing August 2024 | $ | 175,000 | $ | 175,000 | ||||||||||||
Unamortized debt issuance costs related to senior unsecured notes | (988 | ) | (1,026 | ) | ||||||||||||
Junior subordinated debentures (variable rates of 3.30% to 5.29%) maturing April 2032 to September 2037 | 60,310 | 60,310 | ||||||||||||||
Other basis adjustments | (3,849 | ) | (3,971 | ) | (3,454 | ) | (3,585 | ) | ||||||||
Old National Bank: | ||||||||||||||||
Capital lease obligation | 4,013 | 4,092 | ||||||||||||||
Capital lease obligations | 5,358 | 5,389 | ||||||||||||||
Subordinated debentures (fixed rate 5.75%) | 12,000 | 12,000 | ||||||||||||||
Premium on subordinated debentures | 672 | 694 | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||
Total other borrowings | $ | 219,021 | $ | 218,939 | $ | 248,898 | $ | 248,782 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
Contractual maturities of other borrowings at March 31, 20172018 were as follows:
(dollars in thousands) | ||||||||
Due in 2017 | $ | 117 | ||||||
Due in 2018 | 79 | $ | 96 | |||||
Due in 2019 | 85 | 137 | ||||||
Due in 2020 | 91 | 147 | ||||||
Due in 2021 | 99 | 160 | ||||||
Due in 2022 | 172 | |||||||
Thereafter | 223,542 | 251,956 | ||||||
Unamortized debt issuance costs and other basis adjustments | (4,992 | ) | (3,770 | ) | ||||
|
| |||||||
Total | $ | 219,021 | $ | 248,898 | ||||
|
|
Senior Notes
In August 2014, Old National issued $175.0 million of senior unsecured notes with a 4.125% interest rate. These notes pay interest on February 15 and August 15. The notes mature on August 15, 2024.
Junior Subordinated Debentures
Junior subordinated debentures related to trust preferred securities are classified in “other borrowings”. Theseborrowings.” With the addition of Anchor (MN) assets, these securities now qualify as Tier 12 capital for regulatory purposes, subject to certain limitations. Prior to the fourth quarter of 2017, these securities qualified as Tier 1 capital for regulatory purposes.
In 2007,Through various acquisitions, Old National acquired St. Joseph Capital Trust II in conjunction with its acquisition of St. Joseph Capital Corporation.assumed junior subordinated debenture obligations related to various trusts that issued trust preferred securities. Old National guarantees the payment of distributions on the trust preferred securities issued by St. Joseph Capital Trust II. St. Joseph Capital Trust II issued $5.0 million in preferred securities in March 2005. The preferred securities have a variable rate of interest priced at the three-month London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) plus 175 basis points, payable quarterly and maturing on March 17, 2035.trusts. Proceeds from the issuance of each of these securities were used to purchase junior subordinated debentures with the same financial terms as the securities issued by St. Joseph Capital Trust II.
In 2011, Old National acquired Monroe Bancorp Capital Trust I and Monroe Bancorp Statutory Trust II in conjunction with its acquisition of Monroe Bancorp. Old National guarantees the payment of distributions on the trust preferred securities issued by Monroe Bancorp Capital Trust I and Monroe Bancorp Statutory Trust II. Monroe Bancorp Capital Trust I issued $3.0 million in preferred securities in July 2006. The preferred securities have a variable rate of interest priced at the three-month LIBOR plus 160 basis points. Proceeds from the issuance of these securities were used to purchase junior subordinated debentures with the same financial terms as the securities issued by Monroe Bancorp Capital Trust I. Monroe Bancorp Statutory Trust II issued $5.0 million in preferred securities in March 2007. The preferred securities have a variable rate of interest priced at the three-month LIBOR plus 160 basis points. Proceeds from the issuance of these securities were used to purchase junior subordinated debentures with the same financial terms as the securities issued by Monroe Bancorp Statutory Trust II.
In 2012, Old National acquired Home Federal Statutory Trust I in conjunction with its acquisition of Indiana Community Bancorp. Old National guarantees the payment of distributions on the trust preferred securities issued by Home Federal Statutory Trust I. Home Federal Statutory Trust I issued $15.0 million in preferred securities in September 2006. The preferred securities carry a variable rate of interest priced at the three-month LIBOR plus 165 basis points. Proceeds from the issuance of these securities were used to purchase junior subordinated debentures with the same financial terms as the securities issued by Home Federal Statutory Trust I.
On April 25, 2014, Old National acquired Tower Capital Trust 2 and Tower Capital Trust 3 in conjunction with its acquisition of Tower Financial Corporation. Old National guarantees the payment of distributions on the trust preferred securities issued by Tower Capital Trust 2 and Tower Capital Trust 3. Tower Capital Trust 2 issued $8.0 million in preferred securities in December 2005. The preferred securities carry a variable rate of interest priced at the three-month LIBOR plus 134 basis points. Proceeds from the issuance of these securities were used to purchase junior subordinated debentures with the same financial terms as the securities issued by Tower Capital Trust 2.
Tower Capital Trust 3 issued $9.0 million in preferred securities in December 2006. The preferred securities carry a variable rate of interest priced at the three-month LIBOR plus 169 basis points. Proceeds from the issuance of these securities were used to purchase junior subordinated debentures with the same financial terms as the securities issued by Tower Capital Trust 3.trusts.
Old National, at any time, may redeem the junior subordinated debentures at par and, thereby cause a redemption of the trust preferred securities in whole or in part.
The following table summarizes the terms of our outstanding junior subordinated debentures at March 31, 2018:
(dollars in thousands) | Rate at | |||||||||||||||||
Issuance | March 31, | |||||||||||||||||
Name of Trust | Issuance Date | Amount | Rate | 2018 | Maturity Date | |||||||||||||
VFSC Capital Trust I | April 2002 | $ | 3,093 | 3-month LIBOR plus 3.70% | 5.06 | % | April 22, 2032 | |||||||||||
VFSC Capital Trust II | October 2002 | 4,124 | 3-month LIBOR plus 3.45% | 5.29 | % | November 7, 2032 | ||||||||||||
VFSC Capital Trust III | April 2004 | 3,093 | 3-month LIBOR plus 2.80% | 4.81 | % | September 8, 2034 | ||||||||||||
St. Joseph Capital Trust II | March 2005 | 5,000 | 3-month LIBOR plus 1.75% | 3.93 | % | March 20, 2035 | ||||||||||||
Anchor Capital Trust III | August 2005 | 5,000 | 3-month LIBOR plus 1.55% | 3.86 | % | August 23, 2035 | ||||||||||||
Tower Capital Trust 2 | December 2005 | 8,000 | 3-month LIBOR plus 1.34% | 3.65 | % | December 4, 2035 | ||||||||||||
Home Federal Statutory Trust I | September 2006 | 15,000 | 3-month LIBOR plus 1.65% | 3.77 | % | September 15, 2036 | ||||||||||||
Monroe Bancorp Capital Trust I | July 2006 | 3,000 | 3-month LIBOR plus 1.60% | 3.30 | % | October 7, 2036 | ||||||||||||
Monroe Bancorp Statutory Trust II | March 2007 | 5,000 | 3-month LIBOR plus 1.60% | 3.72 | % | June 15, 2037 | ||||||||||||
Tower Capital Trust 3 | December 2006 | 9,000 | 3-month LIBOR plus 1.69% | 3.70 | % | September 15, 2037 | ||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||||||
Total | $ | 60,310 | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
Subordinated Debentures
On November 1, 2017, Old National assumed $12.0 million of subordinated fixed-to-floating notes related to the acquisition of Anchor (MN). The subordinated debentures have a 5.75% fixed rate of interest through October 29, 2020. From October 30, 2020 to the October 30, 2025 maturity date, the debentures have a floating rate of interest equal to the three-month LIBOR rate plus 4.356%.
Capital Lease ObligationObligations
On January 1, 2004, Old National entered into a long-term capital lease obligation for a branch office building in Owensboro, Kentucky, which extends for 25 years with one renewal option for 10 years. The economic substance of this lease is that Old National is financing the acquisition of the building through the lease and accordingly, the building is recorded as an asset and the lease is recorded as a liability. The fair value of the capital lease obligation was estimated using a discounted cash flow analysis based on Old National’s current incremental borrowing rate for similar types of borrowing arrangements.
On May 1, 2016, Old National acquired Anchor (WI), assuming a five yearfive-year capital lease obligation for equipment.
On November 1, 2017, Old National assumed a capital lease obligation for a banking center in Arden Hills, Minnesota related to the acquisition of Anchor (MN). The remaining base term of the lease is five years with one renewal option of ten years. For purposes of measuring the lease obligation, we determined that we would be “reasonably assured” to exercise the renewal option. The fair value of the capital lease obligation was estimated using a discounted cash flow analysis based on a market rate for similar types of borrowing arrangements. Based on the above assumptions, Old National measured the capital lease obligation at $1.5 million as of the date of acquisition.
At March 31, 2017,2018, the future minimum lease payments under the capital lease arrangements were as follows:
(dollars in thousands) | ||||||||
2017 remaining | $ | 369 | ||||||
2018 | 410 | $ | 426 | |||||
2019 | 430 | 589 | ||||||
2020 | 430 | 589 | ||||||
2021 | 430 | 589 | ||||||
2022 | 589 | |||||||
Thereafter | 7,976 | 9,275 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
Total minimum lease payments | 10,045 | 12,057 | ||||||
Less amounts representing interest | (6,032 | ) | (6,699 | ) | ||||
|
| |||||||
Present value of net minimum lease payments | $ | 4,013 | $ | 5,358 | ||||
|
|
NOTE 17 – ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
The following table summarizes the changes within each classification of AOCI, net of tax, for the three months ended March 31, 2018 and 2017:
Unrealized Gains | Unrealized Gains | Gains and | Defined | |||||||||||||||||
and Losses on | and Losses on | Losses on | Benefit | |||||||||||||||||
Available-for-Sale | Held-to-Maturity | Cash Flow | Pension | |||||||||||||||||
(dollars in thousands) | Securities | Securities | Hedges | Plans | Total | |||||||||||||||
Three Months Ended March 31, 2018 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Balance at beginning of period | $ | (35,557 | ) | $ | (12,107 | ) | $ | (2,337 | ) | $ | (271 | ) | $ | (50,272 | ) | |||||
Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications | (8,872 | ) | 4,514 | 3,444 | — | (914 | ) | |||||||||||||
Amounts reclassified from AOCI to income (a) | (593 | ) | 456 | 580 | 20 | 463 | ||||||||||||||
Amount reclassified from AOCI to retained earnings for cumulative effect of change in accounting principle (b) | — | — | (52 | ) | — | (52 | ) | |||||||||||||
Amounts reclassified from AOCI to retained earnings related to the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 (c) | (7,583 | ) | (2,600 | ) | (509 | ) | (59 | ) | (10,751 | ) | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
Balance at end of period | $ | (52,605 | ) | $ | (9,737 | ) | $ | 1,126 | $ | (310 | ) | $ | (61,526 | ) | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
Three Months Ended March 31, 2017 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Balance at beginning of period | $ | (39,012 | ) | $ | (13,310 | ) | $ | (6,715 | ) | $ | (335 | ) | $ | (59,372 | ) | |||||
Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications | 9,967 | — | 360 | — | 10,327 | |||||||||||||||
Amounts reclassified from AOCI to income (a) | (947 | ) | 295 | 1,115 | 17 | 480 | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
Balance at end of period | $ | (29,992 | ) | $ | (13,015 | ) | $ | (5,240 | ) | $ | (318 | ) | $ | (48,565 | ) | |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) | See table below for details about reclassifications to income. |
(b) | See Note 3 for details about reclassification from AOCI to beginning retained earnings resulting from the adoption of ASU 2017-12. |
(c) | See Note 3 for details about reclassification from AOCI to beginning retained earnings resulting from the adoption of ASU 2018-02. |
The following table summarizes the significant amounts reclassified out of each component of AOCI for the three months ended March 31, 2018 and 2017:
Amount Reclassified | Affected Line Item in the | |||||||||
Details about AOCI Components | from AOCI | Statement of Income | ||||||||
Three Months Ended | ||||||||||
March 31, | ||||||||||
(dollars in thousands) | 2018 | 2017 |
| |||||||
Unrealized gains and losses on available-for-sale securities | $ | 788 | $ | 1,500 | Net securities gains | |||||
(195 | ) | (553 | ) | Income tax (expense) benefit | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||
$ | 593 | $ | 947 | Net income | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||
Unrealized gains and losses on held-to-maturity securities | $ | (591 | ) | $ | (449 | ) | Interest income (expense) | |||
135 | 154 | Income tax (expense) benefit | ||||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||
$ | (456 | ) | $ | (295 | ) | Net income | ||||
|
|
|
| |||||||
Gains and losses on cash flow hedges Interest rate contracts | $ | (769 | ) | $ | (1,799 | ) | Interest income (expense) | |||
189 | 684 | Income tax (expense) benefit | ||||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||
$ | (580 | ) | $ | (1,115 | ) | Net income | ||||
|
|
|
| |||||||
Amortization of defined benefit pension items | ||||||||||
Actuarial gains (losses) | $ | (51 | ) | $ | (27 | ) | Salaries and employee benefits | |||
31 | 10 | Income tax (expense) benefit | ||||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||
$ | (20 | ) | $ | (17 | ) | Net income | ||||
|
|
|
| |||||||
Total reclassifications for the period | $ | (463 | ) | $ | (480 | ) | Net income | |||
|
|
|
|
NOTE 17 -18 – EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS
Retirement Plan
Old National had a funded noncontributory defined benefit plan (the “Retirement Plan”) that had been frozen since December 31, 2005. During the first quarter of 2016, the Companywe notified plan participants of itsour intent to terminate the Retirement Plan effective May 15, 2016. During October 2016, the Retirement Plan settled plan liabilities through either lump sum distributions to plan participants or annuity contracts purchased from a third-party insurance company that provided for the payment of vested benefits to those participants that did not elect the lump sum option. At March 31, 2017,2018, there were no remaining plan assets.
Restoration Plan
Old National maintains an unfunded pension restoration plan (the “Restoration Plan”) which provides benefits for eligible employees that are in excess of the limits under Section 415 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, that apply to the Retirement Plan. The Restoration Plan is designed to comply with the requirements of ERISA. The entire cost of the plan, which was also frozen as of December 31, 2005, is supported by contributions from the Company. The Restoration Plan is unfunded.
Old National contributed $0.2 million to cover benefit payments from the Restoration Plan during the three months ended March 31, 2017. Old National expects to contribute an additional $18 thousand to cover benefit payments from the Restoration Plan during the remainder of 2017.
The net periodic benefit cost and its components were as follows:
Three Months Ended | ||||||||
March 31, | ||||||||
(dollars in thousands) | 2017 | 2016 | ||||||
Interest cost | $ | 10 | $ | 13 | ||||
Recognized actuarial loss | 27 | 27 | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Net periodic benefit cost | $ | 37 | $ | 40 | ||||
|
|
|
|
NOTE 18 -19 – STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION
At March 31, 2017,2018, Old National had 4.94.6 million shares remaining available for issuance under the Company’s Amended and Restated 2008 Incentive Compensation Plan. The granting of awards to key employees is typically in the form of restricted stock awards or units.
Restricted Stock Awards
The CompanyOld National granted 9573 thousand time-based restricted stock awards to certain key officers during the three months ended March 31, 2017,2018, with shares vesting generally over athirty-six month period. Compensation expense is recognized on a straight-line basis over the vesting period. Shares are subject to certain restrictions and risk of forfeiture by the participants. At March 31, 2017,2018, unrecognized compensation expense was estimated to be $4.4$4.5 million for unvested restricted stock awards. The cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 2.1 years.
Old National recorded stock-based compensation expense, net of tax, related to restricted stock awards of $0.5 million, net of tax, during the three months ended March 31, 2018, compared to $0.4 million, net of tax, during the three months ended March 31, 2017, compared to $0.3 million, net of tax, during the three months ended March 31, 2016 related to the vesting of restricted stock awards.2017.
Restricted Stock Units
The CompanyOld National granted 277288 thousand shares of performance based restricted stock units to certain key officers during the three months ended March 31, 2017,2018, with shares vesting at the end of athirty-six month period based on the achievement of certain targets. For certain awards, the level of performance could increase or decrease the percentage of shares earned. Compensation expense is recognized on a straight-line basis over the vesting period. Shares are subject to certain restrictions and risk of forfeiture by the participants. At March 31, 2017,2018, unrecognized compensation expense was estimated to be $6.4$7.3 million. The cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 2.3 years.
Old National recorded stock basedstock-based compensation expense, net of tax, related to restricted stock units of $0.9 million during the three months ended March 31, 2018, compared to $0.4 million during the three months ended March 31, 2017, compared to $0.5 million during the three months ended March 31, 2016.2017.
Stock Options
Old National has not granted stock options since 2009. However, Old National did acquire stock options through prior year acquisitions. Old National did not record any stock basedstock-based compensation expense related to these stock options during the three months ended March 31, 20172018 or 2016.2017.
Stock Appreciation Rights
Old National has never granted stock appreciation rights. However, Old National did acquire stock appreciation rights through a prior year acquisition. Old National did not record any incremental expense associated with the conversion of these stock appreciation rights during the three months ended March 31, 20172018 or 2016.2017. At March 31, 2017, 0.1 million2018, 62 thousand stock appreciation rights remained outstanding.
Following is a summary of the major items comprising the differences in taxes from continuing operations computed at the federal statutory rate and as recorded in the consolidated statements of income:
Three Months Ended | Three Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
March 31, | March 31, | |||||||||||||||
(dollars in thousands) | 2017 | 2016 | 2018 | 2017 | ||||||||||||
Provision at statutory rate of 35% | $ | 16,269 | $ | 12,827 | ||||||||||||
Provision at statutory rate (1) | $ | 11,117 | $ | 16,269 | ||||||||||||
Tax-exempt income: | ||||||||||||||||
Tax-exempt interest | (2,191 | ) | (3,702 | ) | ||||||||||||
Section 291/265 interest disallowance | 62 | 57 | ||||||||||||||
Company-owned life insurance income | (547 | ) | (752 | ) | ||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||||
Tax-exempt income | (4,397 | ) | (4,168 | ) | (2,676 | ) | (4,397 | ) | ||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||||
State income taxes | 851 | 583 | 1,188 | 851 | ||||||||||||
Interim period effective rate adjustment | (455 | ) | (148 | ) | 92 | (455 | ) | |||||||||
Tax credit investments | (1,876 | ) | (80 | ) | ||||||||||||
Tax credit investments - federal | (5,769 | ) | (1,876 | ) | ||||||||||||
Other, net | 99 | 657 | 1,005 | 99 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||
Income tax expense | $ | 10,491 | $ | 9,671 | $ | 4,957 | $ | 10,491 | ||||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||
Effective tax rate | 22.6 | % | 26.4 | % | 9.4 | % | 22.6 | % | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
(1) | The statutory rate was 21% for the three months ended March 31, 2018, compared to 35% for the three months ended March 31, 2017. |
In accordance with ASC740-270,Accounting for Interim Reporting, the provision for income taxes was recorded at March 31, 20172018 and 20162017 based on the current estimate of the effective annual rate.
Tax credit investments are included in the Company’s estimate of the effective annual tax rate. The lower effective tax rate during the three months ended March 31, 20172018 when compared to the three months ended March 31, 20162017 is primarily the result of the lowering of the federal corporate tax rate to 21% and an increase in federal tax credits available. On December 22, 2017, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (“H.R. 1”) was enacted into legislation. Under ASC 740, the effects of changes in tax rates and laws are recognized in the period in which the new legislation is enacted. Accordingly, Old National recorded an estimated $39.3 million for the revaluation of Old National’s deferred tax assets in December 2017.
Shortly after the enactment date, the SEC issued SAB 118, which addresses the situations where the accounting for changes in tax laws is complete, incomplete but can be reasonably estimated, and incomplete and cannot be reasonably estimated. SAB 118 also permits a measurement period of up to one year from the date of enactment to refine the provisional accounting. During the three months ended March 31, 2018, the immaterial adjustments made to the preliminary valuation of assets acquired and liabilities assumed in the acquisition of Anchor (MN) impacted our estimated revaluation of Old National’s deferred tax assets. Old National continues to analyze H.R. 1, including the impact on alternative minimum tax credits disclosed further below, as well as the acquisition accounting of Anchor (MN), and expects any refinements to the provisional accounting to be complete in 2018.
Unrecognized Tax Benefits
The CompanyOld National and its subsidiaries file a consolidated U.S. federal income tax return, as well as filing various state returns. Unrecognized state income tax benefits are reported net of their related deferred federal income tax benefit.
A reconciliation of the beginning and ending amounts of unrecognized tax benefits iswas as follows:
Three Months Ended | ||||||||||||||||
March 31, | ||||||||||||||||
(dollars in thousands) | 2017 | 2016 | 2018 | 2017 | ||||||||||||
Balance at January 1, | $ | 777 | $ | 124 | ||||||||||||
Balance at beginning of period | $ | 874 | $ | 777 | ||||||||||||
Additions based on tax positions related to the current year | 32 | 14 | 39 | 32 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||
Balance at March 31, | $ | 809 | $ | 138 | ||||||||||||
Balance at end of period | $ | 913 | $ | 809 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
If recognized, approximately $0.8$0.9 million of unrecognized tax benefits, net of interest, would favorably affect the effective income tax rate in future periods. Old National expects the total amount of unrecognized tax benefits to decrease by approximately $0.3 million in the next twelve months.
Net Deferred Tax Assets
Significant components of net deferred tax assets (liabilities) were as follows at March 31, 20172018 and December 31, 2016:2017:
March 31, | December 31, | March 31, | December 31, | |||||||||||||
(dollars in thousands) | 2017 | 2016 | 2018 | 2017 | ||||||||||||
Deferred Tax Assets | ||||||||||||||||
Allowance for loan losses, net of recapture | $ | 19,730 | $ | 19,773 | $ | 13,062 | $ | 12,958 | ||||||||
Benefit plan accruals | 15,603 | 23,846 | 11,173 | 11,080 | ||||||||||||
Alternative minimum tax credit | 19,783 | 19,523 | 2,545 | 25,084 | ||||||||||||
Unrealized losses on benefit plans | 194 | 205 | 101 | 108 | ||||||||||||
Net operating loss carryforwards | 65,690 | 66,917 | 33,463 | 39,631 | ||||||||||||
Federal tax credits | 3,448 | 35 | 11,089 | 5,516 | ||||||||||||
Other-than-temporary impairment | 3,606 | 3,606 | 36 | 1,424 | ||||||||||||
Deferred gain on securities | 2,118 | — | ||||||||||||||
Acquired loans | 37,331 | 40,522 | 27,207 | 29,669 | ||||||||||||
Lease exit obligation | 2,440 | 2,060 | 1,270 | 1,337 | ||||||||||||
Unrealized losses onavailable-for-sale investment securities | 18,088 | 23,365 | 16,661 | 14,011 | ||||||||||||
Unrealized losses onheld-to-maturity investment securities | 6,964 | 7,118 | 2,865 | 3,630 | ||||||||||||
Unrealized losses on hedges | 3,212 | 4,116 | — | 923 | ||||||||||||
Other real estate owned | 2,288 | 3,310 | 379 | 369 | ||||||||||||
Other, net | 2,405 | 2,675 | 3,214 | 829 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||
Total deferred tax assets | 200,782 | 217,071 | 125,183 | 146,569 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||
Deferred Tax Liabilities | ||||||||||||||||
Accretion on investment securities | (657 | ) | (700 | ) | (499 | ) | (493 | ) | ||||||||
Purchase accounting | (16,994 | ) | (17,552 | ) | (16,314 | ) | (16,718 | ) | ||||||||
Loan servicing rights | (9,584 | ) | (9,627 | ) | (5,989 | ) | (6,058 | ) | ||||||||
Premises and equipment | (4,937 | ) | (4,800 | ) | (9,277 | ) | (10,052 | ) | ||||||||
Prepaid expenses | (1,277 | ) | (1,277 | ) | ||||||||||||
Tax credit investments | (1,036 | ) | (168 | ) | ||||||||||||
Unrealized gains on hedges | (367 | ) | — | |||||||||||||
Other, net | (3,234 | ) | (2,529 | ) | (1,651 | ) | (946 | ) | ||||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||
Total deferred tax liabilities | (35,406 | ) | (35,208 | ) | (36,410 | ) | (35,712 | ) | ||||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||
Net deferred tax assets | $ | 165,376 | $ | 181,863 | $ | 88,773 | $ | 110,857 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
Through the acquisition of Anchor (WI) in the second quarter of 2016 and Lafayette Savings Bank in the fourth quarter of 2014, both former thrifts, Old National Bank’s retained earnings at March 31, 20172018 include base-year bad debt reserves, created for tax purposes prior to 1988, totaling $52.8 million. Of this total, $50.9 million was acquired from Anchor (WI), and $1.9 million was acquired from Lafayette Savings Bank. Base-year reserves are subject to recapture in the unlikely event that Old National Bank (1) makes distributions in excess of current and accumulated earnings and profits, as calculated for federal income tax purposes, (2) redeems its stock, or (3) liquidates. Old National Bank has no intention of making such a nondividend distribution. Accordingly, under current accounting principles, a related deferred income tax liability of $19.8$13.0 million has not been recognized.
No valuation allowance was recorded at March 31, 20172018 or December 31, 20162017 because, based on current expectations, Old National believes it will generate sufficient income in future years to realize deferred tax assets. Old National has federal net operating loss carryforwards totaling $158.8$104.5 million at March 31, 20172018 and $162.9$130.7 million at December 31, 2016.2017. This federal net operating loss was acquired from the acquisitionsacquisition of Indiana Community Bancorp in 2012 and Anchor (WI) in 2016. If not used, the federal net operating loss carryforwards will beginexpire from 2028 to expire in 2027.2033. Old National has alternative minimum tax (“AMT”) credit carryforwards totaling $19.8$25.1 million at March 31, 20172018 and $19.5 million at December 31, 2016.2017. The alternative minimumenactment of H.R.1 eliminates the parallel tax system known as the AMT and allows any existing AMT credits to be used to reduce regular tax or be refunded from 2018 to 2021. ASC 740 allows for the reclassification of the AMT credit from a deferred tax asset to a current tax asset, except for the amount limited by section 382. Old National has $2.5 million of AMT credit carryforward does not expire.subject to section 382 limitations. The $2.5 million is maintained in deferred tax assets and the remaining $22.6 million has been reclassified to a current tax asset. Old
National has federal tax credit carryforwards of $3.4$11.0 million at March 31, 20172018 and $35 thousand$5.5 million at December 31, 2016.2017. The federal tax credits consist mainly of federal historic credits, energy efficient home credits, low income housing credits, and research and development credits, and federal historic credits that, if not used, will expire from 20272025 to 2037.2038. Old National has recorded state net operating loss carryforwards totaling $211.1$191.2 million at March 31, 20172018 and $206.3$203.6 million at December 31, 2016.2017. If not used, the state net operating loss carryforwards will expire from 20232024 to 2037.2033. Old National has state tax credit carryforwards totaling $1.3 million at March 31, 2018 and $1.3 million at December 31, 2017. The state tax credits will not expire.
The federal and recorded state net operating loss carryforwards are subject to an annual limitation under Internal Revenue Code section 382. Old National believes that all of the recorded net operating loss carryforwards will be used prior to expiration.
NOTE 2021 - DERIVATIVE FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
As discussed in Note 3, Old National adopted ASU 2017-12 in the first quarter of 2018. This adoption primarily impacted our existing cash flow and fair value hedges related to certain FHLB advances. For cash flow hedges as of the date of adoption, the transition guidance in paragraph 815-20-65-3(d) eliminated the separate measurement of ineffectiveness by means of a cumulative-effect adjustment to accumulated other comprehensive income with a corresponding adjustment to the opening balance of retained earnings. For fair value hedges of interest rate risk, the provisions of paragraph 815-25-35-13 permit Old National to elect to modify the measurement methodology to be based on the benchmark rate component of the contractual coupon cash flows without dedesignation of the hedging relationship. The measurement methodology modification shall be applied as of the hedging relationship’s original inception date. The cumulative effect of applying this election shall be recognized as an adjustment to the basis adjustment of the hedged item recognized on the balance sheet with a corresponding adjustment to the opening balance of retained earnings as of the initial application date.
As part of our overall interest rate risk management, Old National uses derivative instruments, including interest rate swaps, caps, and floors. The notional amount of these derivative instruments was $810.0$758.5 million at March 31, 20172018 and $660.0$708.5 million at December 31, 2016.2017. These derivative financial instruments at March 31, 2017 consist2018 consisted of $35.0$133.5 million notional amount of receive-fixed,pay-variable interest rate swaps on certain of its FHLB advances and $775.0$625.0 million notional amount ofpay-fixed, receive-variable interest rate swaps on certain of its FHLB advances. Derivative financial instruments at December 31, 2016 consist2017 consisted of $35.0$33.5 million notional amount of receive-fixed,pay-variable interest rate swaps on certain of its FHLB advances and $625.0$675.0 million notional amount ofpay-fixed, receive-variable interest rate swaps on certain of its FHLB advances. These hedges were entered into to manage interest rate risk. Derivative instruments are recognized on the balance sheet at their fair value and are not reported on a net basis.
In addition, commitmentsaccordance with ASC 815-20-35-1, subsequent changes in fair value for a hedging instrument that has been designated and qualifies as part of a hedging relationship should be accounted for in the following manner:
Cash flow hedges: changes in fair value will be recognized as a component in other comprehensive income.
Fair value hedges: changes in fair value will be recognized concurrently in earnings.
Consistent with this guidance, as long as a hedging instrument is designated and the results of the effectiveness testing support that the instrument qualifies for hedge accounting treatment, 100% of the periodic changes in fair value of the hedging instrument will be accounted for as outlined above. This is the case whether or not economic mismatches exist in the hedging relationship. As a result, there will be no periodic measurement or recognition of ineffectiveness. Rather, the full impact of hedge gains and losses will be recognized in the period in which the hedged transactions impact earnings.
While separate measurement and presentation of ineffectiveness is being eliminated, paragraph 815-20-45-1A requires the change in fair value of the hedging instrument that is included in the assessment of hedge effectiveness be presented in the same income statement line item that is used to present the earnings effect of the hedged item.
Commitments to fund certain mortgage loans (interest rate lock commitments) and forward commitments for the future delivery of mortgage loans to third party investors are considered derivatives. These derivative contracts do not qualify for hedge accounting. At March 31, 2018, the notional amount of the interest rate lock commitments
was $61.0 million and forward commitments were $68.3 million. At December 31, 2017, the notional amount of the interest rate lock commitments was $58.3$29.9 million and forward commitments were $60.8 million. At December 31, 2016, the notional amount of the interest rate lock commitments was $40.3 million and forward commitments were $86.1$41.2 million. It is our practice to enter into forward commitments for the future delivery of residential mortgage loans to third party investors when interest rate lock commitments are entered into in order to economically hedge the effect of changes in interest rates resulting from our commitment to fund the loans.
Old National also enters into derivative instruments for the benefit of its customers. The notional amounts of these customer derivative instruments and the offsetting counterparty derivative instruments were $642.7$839.3 million at March 31, 2017.2018. The notional amounts of these customer derivative instruments and the offsetting counterparty derivative instruments were $582.7$826.6 million at December 31, 2016.2017. These derivative contracts do not qualify for hedge accounting. These instruments include interest rate swaps, caps, and collars.Commonly,collars. Commonly, Old National will economically hedge significant exposures related to these derivative contracts entered into for the benefit of customers by entering into offsetting contracts with approved, reputable, independent counterparties with substantially matching terms.
Old National enters into derivative financial instruments as part of its foreign currency risk management strategies. These derivative instruments consist of foreign currency forward contracts to accommodate the business needs of its customers. Old National does not designate these foreign currency forward contracts for hedge accounting treatment. The notional amounts of these foreign currency forward contracts and the offsetting counterparty derivative instruments were $1.2 million at March 31, 2018 and $0.8 million at December 31, 2017.
Credit risk arises from the possible inability of counterparties to meet the terms of their contracts. Old National’s exposure is limited to the replacement value of the contracts rather than the notional, principal, or contract amounts. There are provisions in our agreements with the counterparties that allow for certain unsecured credit exposure up to an agreed threshold. Exposures in excess of the agreed thresholds are collateralized. In addition, we minimize credit risk through credit approvals, limits, and monitoring procedures.
Amounts reported in AOCI related to cash flow hedges will be reclassified to interest income or interest expense as interest payments are received or paid on the Company’sOld National’s derivative instruments. During the next 12 months, the Company estimateswe estimate that $0.3$2.0 million will be reclassified to interest income and $5.2$1.3 million will be reclassified to interest expense.
On the balance sheet, asset derivatives are included in other assets, and liability derivatives are included in other liabilities. The following table summarizes the fair value of derivative financial instruments utilized by Old National:
March 31, 2017 | December 31, 2016 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(dollars in thousands) | Asset Derivatives | Liability Derivatives | Asset Derivatives | Liability Derivatives | Balance Sheet Location | Fair Value | Balance Sheet Location | Fair Value | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
March 31, 2018 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest rate contracts | $ | 3,113 | $ | 9,433 | $ | 3,056 | $ | 11,582 | Other assets | $ | 4,720 | Other liabilities | $ | 3,382 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total derivatives designated as hedging instruments | $ | 3,113 | $ | 9,433 | $ | 3,056 | $ | 11,582 | $ | 4,720 | $ | 3,382 | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest rate contracts | $ | 11,913 | $ | 11,994 | $ | 11,903 | $ | 11,992 | Other assets | $ | 8,113 | Other liabilities | $ | 16,256 | ||||||||||||||||||
Mortgage contracts | 1,571 | 322 | 2,742 | — | Other assets | 1,475 | Other liabilities | 90 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Foreign currency contracts | Other assets | 13 | Other liabilities | 2 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total derivatives not designated as hedging instruments | $ | 13,484 | $ | 12,316 | $ | 14,645 | $ | 11,992 | $ | 9,601 | $ | 16,348 | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total | $ | 16,597 | $ | 21,749 | $ | 17,701 | $ | 23,574 | $ | 14,321 | $ | 19,730 | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
December 31, 2017 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest rate contracts | Other assets | $ | 3,351 | Other liabilities | $ | 5,351 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total derivatives designated as hedging instruments | $ | 3,351 | $ | 5,351 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest rate contracts | Other assets | $ | 10,012 | Other liabilities | $ | 10,933 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mortgage contracts | Other assets | 747 | Other liabilities | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Foreign currency contracts | Other assets | 8 | Other liabilities | 8 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total derivatives not designated as hedging instruments | $ | 10,767 | $ | 10,941 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total | $ | 14,118 | $ | 16,292 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
The effect of derivative instruments in fair value hedging relationships on the consolidated statements of income for the three months ended March 31, 2018 and 2017 were as follows:
(dollars in thousands) | Gain (Loss) | |||||||||||||||
Derivatives in Fair Value Hedging Relationships | Location of Gain or (Loss) Recognized in in Income on Derivative | Gain (Loss) Recognized in Income on Derivative | Hedged Items in Fair Value Hedging Relationships | Location of Gain or (Loss) Recognized in Hedged Item | Recognized in Income on Related Hedged Items | |||||||||||
Three Months Ended March 31, 2018 | ||||||||||||||||
Interest rate contracts | Interest income/(expense) | $ | (720 | ) | Fixed-rate debt | Interest income/(expense) | $ | 722 | ||||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||
Three Months Ended March 31, 2017 | ||||||||||||||||
Interest rate contracts | Interest income/(expense) | $ | (254 | ) | Fixed-rate debt | Interest income/(expense) | $ | 290 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
The difference between the gain (loss) recognized in income on derivatives and the gain (loss) recognized in income on the related hedged items represents hedge ineffectiveness. In addition, the net swap settlements that accrue each period are also reported in interest expense.
The effect of derivative instruments in cash flow hedging relationships on the consolidated statements of income for the three months ended March 31, 2018 and 2017 were as follows:
(dollars in thousands) | Three Months Ended | Three Months Ended | ||||||||||||||||
March 31, | March 31, | |||||||||||||||||
2018 | 2017 | 2018 | 2017 | |||||||||||||||
Derivatives in Cash Flow Hedging Relationships | Location of Gain or (Loss) Reclassified (Effective Portion) | Gain (Loss) Recognized in Other Comprehensive Income on Derivative (Effective Portion) | Gain (Loss) Reclassified from AOCI into Income (Effective Portion) | |||||||||||||||
Interest rate contracts | Interest income/(expense) | $ | 4,563 | $ | 580 | $ | (769 | ) | $ | (1,799 | ) | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The ineffective portion and amount excluded from effectiveness testing related to derivatives in cash flow hedging relationships was immaterial for the three months ended March 31, 2018 and 2017.
The effect of derivatives not designated as hedging instruments on the consolidated statements of income for the three months ended March 31, 2018 and 2017 and 2016 arewere as follows:
Three Months Ended | ||||||||||
March 31, | ||||||||||
(dollars in thousands) | 2017 | 2016 | ||||||||
Derivatives in | Location of Gain or (Loss) | Amount of Gain or (Loss) | ||||||||
Fair Value Hedging | Recognized in Income on | Recognized in Income on | ||||||||
Relationships | Derivative | Derivative | ||||||||
Interest rate contracts (1) | Interest income / (expense) | $ | (1,663 | ) | $ | (1,043 | ) | |||
Interest rate contracts (2) | Other income / (expense) | 35 | 50 | |||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||
Total | $ | (1,628 | ) | $ | (993 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
| |||||||
Derivatives in | Location of Gain or (Loss) | Amount of Gain or (Loss) | ||||||||
Cash Flow Hedging | Recognized in Income on | Recognized in Income on | ||||||||
Relationships | Derivative | Derivative | ||||||||
Interest rate contracts (1) | Interest income / (expense) | $ | 81 | $ | 86 | |||||
|
|
|
| |||||||
Total | $ | 81 | $ | 86 | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||
Location of Gain or (Loss) | Amount of Gain or (Loss) | |||||||||
Derivatives Not Designated as | Recognized in Income on | Recognized in Income on | ||||||||
Hedging Instruments | Derivative | Derivative | ||||||||
Interest rate contracts (3) | Other income / (expense) | $ | 10 | $ | (3 | ) | ||||
Mortgage contracts | Mortgage banking revenue | (1,494 | ) | 461 | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||
Total | $ | (1,484 | ) | $ | 458 | |||||
|
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands) | Three Months Ended | |||||||||
March 31, | ||||||||||
2018 | 2017 | |||||||||
Derivatives Not Designated as Hedging Instruments | Location of Gain or (Loss) Recognized in Income on Derivative | Gain (Loss) Recognized in Income on Derivative | ||||||||
Interest rate contracts (1) | Other income/(expense) | $ | — | $ | 10 | |||||
Mortgage contracts | Mortgage banking revenue | 638 | (1,494 | ) | ||||||
Foreign currency contracts | Other income/(expense) | 17 | — | |||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||
Total | $ | 655 | $ | (1,484 | ) | |||||
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Includes the valuation differences between the customer and offsetting |
NOTE 21 -22 – COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Litigation
In the normal course of business, Old National Bancorp and its subsidiaries have been named, from time to time, as defendants in various legal actions. Certain of the actual or threatened legal actions may include claims for substantial compensatory and/or punitive damages or claims for indeterminate amounts of damages.
Old National contests liability and/or the amount of damages as appropriate in each pending matter. In view of the inherent difficulty of predicting the outcome of such matters, particularly in cases where claimants seek substantial or indeterminate damages or where investigations and proceedings are in the early stages, Old National cannot predict with certainty the loss or range of loss, if any, related to such matters, how or if such matters will be resolved, when they will ultimately be resolved, or what the eventual settlement, or other relief, if any, might be. Subject to the foregoing, Old National believes, based on current knowledge and after consultation with counsel, that the outcome of such pending matters will not have a material adverse effect on the consolidated financial condition of Old National, although the outcome of such matters could be material to Old National’s operating results and cash flows for a particular future period, depending on, among other things, the level of Old National’s revenues or income for such period. Old National will accrue for a loss contingency if (1) it is probable that a future event will occur and confirm the loss and (2) the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated.
Old National is not currently involved in any material litigation.
Credit-Related Financial Instruments
In the normal course of business, Old National’s banking affiliates have entered into various agreements to extend credit, including loan commitments of $2.417$3.181 billion and standby letters of credit of $54.0$71.9 million at March 31, 2017.2018. At March 31, 2017,2018, approximately $2.277$2.945 billion of the loan commitments had fixed rates and $140.2$236.0 million had floating rates, with the floating interest rates ranging from 0% to 21%25%. At December 31, 2016,2017, loan commitments totaled $2.354$3.144 billion and standby letters of credit totaled $51.7$68.7 million. These commitments are not reflected in the consolidated financial statements. The allowance for unfunded loan commitments totaled $3.0$3.4 million at March 31, 20172018 and $3.2$3.1 million at December 31, 2016.2017.
Old National had credit extensions with various unaffiliated banks related to letter of credit commitments issued on behalf of Old National’s clients totaling $13.3$12.3 million at March 31, 20172018 and $12.4 million at December 31, 2016.2017. Old National provided collateral to the unaffiliated banks to secure credit extensions totaling $12.6$11.5 million at March 31, 20172018 and December 31, 2016.2017. Old National did not provide collateral for the remaining credit extensions.
NOTE 22 -23 – FINANCIAL GUARANTEES
Old National holds instruments, in the normal course of business with clients, that are considered financial guarantees in accordance with FASB ASC460-10 (FIN 45,Guarantor’s Accounting and Disclosure Requirements for Guarantees, Including Indirect Guarantees of Indebtedness of Others),which requires the CompanyOld National to record the instruments at fair value. Standby letters of credit guarantees are issued in connection with agreements made by clients to counterparties. Standby letters of credit are contingent upon failure of the client to perform the terms of the underlying contract. Credit risk associated with standby letters of credit is essentially the same as that associated with extending loans to clients and is subject to normal credit policies. The term of these standby letters of credit is typically one year or less. At March 31, 2017,2018, the notional amount of standby letters of credit was $54.0$71.9 million, which represented the maximum amount of future funding requirements, and the carrying value was $0.3$0.4 million. At December 31, 2016,2017, the notional amount of standby letters of credit was $51.7$68.7 million, which represented the maximum amount of future funding requirements, and the carrying value was $0.3$0.4 million.
Old National is a party in three separate risk participation transactions of interest rate swaps, which had total notional amount of $20.3$17.3 million at March 31, 2017.2018.
NOTE 2324 – SEGMENT INFORMATION
During the second quarter of 2016, Old National sold its insurance operations, ONB Insurance Group, Inc. During the year ended December 31, 2015, the insurance segment’s net income was $2.1 million and its assets totaled $61.8 million at December 31, 2015. In conjunction with the divestiture, Old Nationalre-evaluated its business segments.
Operating segments are components of an enterprise about which separate financial information is available that is evaluated regularly by the chief operating decision maker in deciding how to allocate resources and in assessing performance. Old National Bank, Old National’s bank subsidiary, is the only significant subsidiary upon which management makes decisions regarding how to allocate resources and assess performance. Each of the branches of Old National Bank provide a group of similar community banking services, including such products and services as commercial, real estate and consumer loans, time deposits, checking and savings accounts, cash management, brokerage, trust, and investment advisory services. The individual bank branches located throughout our Midwest footprint have similar operating and economic characteristics. While the chief decision maker monitors the revenue streams of the various products, services, and regional locations, operations are managed and financial performance is evaluated on a Company-wide basis. Accordingly, all of the community banking services and branch locations are considered by management to be aggregated into one reportable operating segment, community banking.
FASB ASC820-10 defines fair value as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. FASB ASC820-10 also establishes a fair value hierarchy, which requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. The standard describes three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair values:
Old National used the following methods and significant assumptions to estimate the fair value of each type of financial instrument:
Investment securities: The fair values for investment securities are determined by quoted market prices, if available (Level 1). For securities where quoted prices are not available, fair values are calculated based on market prices of similar securities (Level 2). For securities where quoted prices or market prices of similar securities are not available, fair values are calculated using discounted cash flows or other market indicators (Level 3). Discounted cash flows are calculated using swap and LIBOR curves plus spreads that adjust for loss severities, volatility, credit risk, and optionality. During times when trading is more liquid, broker quotes are used (if available) to validate the model. Rating agency and industry research reports as well as defaults and deferrals on individual securities are reviewed and incorporated into the calculations.
Residential loans held for sale: The fair value of loans held for sale is determined using quoted prices for a similar asset, adjusted for specific attributes of that loan (Level 2).
Derivative financial instruments: The fair values of derivative financial instruments are based on derivative valuation models using market data inputs as of the valuation date (Level 2).
Assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis, including financial assets and liabilities for which we have elected the fair value option, are summarized below:
Fair Value Measurements at March 31, 2017 Using | Fair Value Measurements at March 31, 2018 Using | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(dollars in thousands) | Carrying Value | Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1) | Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2) | Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) | Carrying Value | Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1) | Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2) | Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Financial Assets | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Trading securities | $ | 5,083 | $ | 5,083 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 5,569 | $ | 5,569 | $ | — | $ | — | ||||||||||||||||
Investment securitiesavailable-for-sale: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
U.S. Treasury | 12,117 | 12,117 | — | — | 9,295 | 9,295 | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
U.S. government-sponsored entities and agencies | 543,034 | — | 543,034 | — | 572,689 | — | 572,689 | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mortgage-backed securities - Agency | 1,474,995 | — | 1,474,995 | — | 1,477,896 | — | 1,477,896 | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
States and political subdivisions | 452,551 | — | 452,551 | 843,488 | — | 839,427 | 4,061 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pooled trust preferred securities | 8,288 | — | — | 8,288 | 8,195 | — | — | 8,195 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other securities | 325,958 | 30,936 | 295,022 | — | 308,300 | 30,435 | 277,865 | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Residential loans held for sale | 17,373 | — | 17,373 | — | 17,635 | — | 17,635 | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Derivative assets | 16,597 | — | 16,597 | — | 14,321 | — | 14,321 | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Financial Liabilities | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Derivative liabilities | 21,749 | — | 21,749 | — | 19,730 | — | 19,730 | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2016 Using | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2017 Using | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(dollars in thousands) | Carrying Value | Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1) | Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2) | Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) | Carrying Value | Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1) | Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2) | Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Financial Assets | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Trading securities | $ | 4,982 | $ | 4,982 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 5,584 | $ | 5,584 | $ | — | $ | — | ||||||||||||||||
Investment securitiesavailable-for-sale: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
U.S. Treasury | 7,103 | 7,103 | — | — | 5,551 | 5,551 | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
U.S. government-sponsored entities and agencies | 493,956 | — | 493,956 | — | 664,286 | — | 664,286 | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mortgage-backed securities - Agency | 1,525,019 | — | 1,525,019 | — | 1,667,682 | — | 1,667,682 | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
States and political subdivisions | 436,684 | — | 436,684 | 530,193 | — | 530,193 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pooled trust preferred securities | 8,119 | — | — | 8,119 | 8,448 | — | — | 8,448 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other securities | 326,293 | 30,905 | 295,388 | — | 320,047 | 30,965 | 289,082 | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Residential loans held for sale | 90,682 | — | 90,682 | — | 17,930 | — | 17,930 | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Derivative assets | 17,701 | — | 17,701 | — | 14,118 | — | 14,118 | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Financial Liabilities | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Derivative liabilities | 23,574 | — | 23,574 | — | 16,292 | — | 16,292 | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
The table below presents a reconciliation of all assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3):
(dollars in thousands) | 2017 | 2016 | ||||||
Balance at January 1, | $ | 8,119 | $ | 7,900 | ||||
Accretion of discount | 4 | 5 | ||||||
Sales/payments received | (163 | ) | (133 | ) | ||||
Increase in fair value of securities | 328 | 215 | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Balance at March 31, | $ | 8,288 | $ | 7,987 | ||||
|
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands) Three Months Ended March 31, 2018 Balance at beginning of period Accretion of discount Sales/payments received Increase (decrease) in fair value of securities Transfers into Level 3 Balance at end of period Three Months Ended March 31, 2017 Balance at beginning of period Accretion of discount Sales/payments received Increase (decrease) in fair value of securities Balance at end of period Pooled Trust States and Preferred Political Securities Subdivisions $ 8,448 $ — 5 — (288 ) — 30 — — 4,061 $ 8,195 $ 4,061 $ 8,119 $ — 4 — (163 ) — 328 — $ 8,288 $ —
The accretion of discounts on securities in the table above is included in interest income. TheAn increase in fair value is reflected in the balance sheet as an increase in the fair value of investment securitiesavailable-for-sale, an increase in accumulated other comprehensive income, which is included in shareholders’ equity, and a decrease in other assets related to the tax impact. Old National transferred a $4.1 million state and political subdivisions security to Level 3 during the three months ended March 31, 2018 because Old National could no longer obtain evidence of observable inputs.
The table below provides quantitative information about significant unobservable inputs used in fair value measurements within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy at March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016:hierarchy:
Valuation | Unobservable | Range (Weighted | Valuation | Unobservable | Range (Weighted | |||||||||||||||||||||
(dollars in thousands) | Fair Value | Techniques | Input | Average) | Fair Value | Techniques | Input | Average) | ||||||||||||||||||
March 31, 2017 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
March 31, 2018 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pooled trust preferred securities | $ | 8,288 | Discounted cash flow | Constant prepayment rate (a) | 0.00% | $ | 8,195 | Discounted cash flow | Constant prepayment rate (a) | 0.00% | ||||||||||||||||
Additional asset defaults (b) | 3.5% -4.5% (4.2%) | Additional asset defaults (b) | 3.4% - 4.3% (4.0%) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Expected asset recoveries (c) | 0.0% -4.1% (0.6%) | Expected asset recoveries (c) | 0.00% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
State and political subdivisions | 4,061 | Discounted cash flow | No unobservable inputs | N/A | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Local municipality issuance | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
December 31, 2016 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Old National owns 100% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Carried at par | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
December 31, 2017 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pooled trust preferred securities | $ | 8,119 | Discounted cash flow | Constant prepayment rate (a) | 0.00% | $ | 8,448 | Discounted cash flow | Constant prepayment rate (a) | 0.00% | ||||||||||||||||
Additional asset defaults (b) | 4.5% -10.0% (7.9%) | Additional asset defaults (b) | 4.2% - 9.6% (7.5%) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Expected asset recoveries (c) | 0.0% -6.1% (0.9%) | Expected asset recoveries (c) | 0.0% - 4.1% (0.6%) |
(a) | Assuming no prepayments. |
(b) | Each currently performing pool asset is assigned a default probability based on the banking environment, which is adjusted for specific issuer evaluation, of 0%, 50%, or 100%. |
(c) | Each currently defaulted pool asset is assigned a recovery probability based on specific issuer evaluation of 0%, 25%, or 100%. |
Significant changes in any of the unobservable inputs used in the fair value measurement in isolation would result in a significant change to the fair value measurement. The pooled trust preferred securities Old National owns are subordinate note classes that rely on an ongoing cash flow stream to support their values. The senior note classes receive the benefit of prepayments to the detriment of subordinate note classes since the ongoing interest cash flow stream is reduced by the early redemption. Generally, a change in prepayment rates or additional pool asset defaults has an impact that is directionally opposite from a change in the expected recovery of a defaulted pool asset.
Assets measured at fair value on anon-recurring basis at March 31, 20172018 are summarized below:
Fair Value Measurements at March 31, 2017 Using | Fair Value Measurements at March 31, 2018 Using | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(dollars in thousands) | Carrying Value | Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1) | Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2) | Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) | Carrying Value | Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1) | Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2) | Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Collateral Dependent Impaired Loans | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Collateral Dependent Impaired Loans: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial loans | $ | 5,461 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 5,461 | $ | 2,453 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 2,453 | ||||||||||||||||
Commercial real estate loans | 12,751 | — | — | 12,751 | 15,267 | — | — | 15,267 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Foreclosed Assets | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Foreclosed Assets: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial real estate | 3,766 | — | — | 3,766 | 671 | — | — | 671 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Residential | 367 | — | — | 367 | 228 | — | — | 228 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Loan servicing rights | 187 | — | 187 | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
Impaired commercial and commercial real estate loans that are deemed collateral dependent are valued based on the fair value of the underlying collateral. These estimates are based on the most recently available appraisals with certain adjustments made based on the type of property, age of appraisal, current status of the property, and other related factors to estimate the current value of the collateral. These impaired commercial and commercial real estate loans had a principal amount of $27.0$27.2 million, with a valuation allowance of $8.8$9.4 million at March 31, 2017.2018. Old National recorded provision expenserecapture associated with these loans totaling $1.1$1.6 million for the three months ended March 31, 2017.2018. Old National recorded provision expense associated with impaired commercial and commercial real estate loans that were deemed collateral dependent totaling $1.4$1.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2016.2017.
Other real estate owned and other repossessed property is measured at fair value less costs to sell and had a net carrying amount of $4.1$0.9 million at March 31, 2017.2018. The estimates of fair value are based on the most recently available appraisals with certain adjustments made based on the type of property, age of appraisal, current status of the property, and other related factors to estimate the current value of the collateral. There were write-downs of other real estate owned of $0.3 million during the three months ended March 31, 2018 and $0.8 million for the three months ended March 31, 20172017.
Loan servicing rights are evaluated for impairment based upon the fair value of the rights as compared to the carrying amount. If the carrying amount of an individual tranche exceeds fair value, impairment is recorded on that tranche so that the servicing asset is carried at fair value. Fair value is determined at a tranche level, based on market prices for comparable mortgage servicing contracts when available, or alternatively based on a valuation model that calculates the present value of estimated future net servicing income. The valuation model utilizes a discount rate, weighted average prepayment speed, and $0.4 millionother economic factors that market participants would use in estimating future net servicing income and that can be validated against available market data (Level 2). The valuation allowance for loan servicing rights with impairments at March 31, 2018 totaled $20 thousand. Old National recorded recoveries associated with these loan servicing rights totaling $9 thousand for the three months ended March 31, 2016.2018 and $18 thousand for the three months ended March 31, 2017.
Assets measured at fair value on anon-recurring basis at December 31, 20162017 are summarized below:
Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2016 Using | Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2017 Using | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(dollars in thousands) | Carrying Value | Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1) | Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2) | Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) | Carrying Value | Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1) | Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2) | Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Collateral Dependent Impaired Loans | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Collateral Dependent Impaired Loans: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial loans | $ | 6,771 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 6,771 | $ | 2,217 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 2,217 | ||||||||||||||||
Commercial real estate loans | 11,632 | — | — | 11,632 | 26,319 | — | — | 26,319 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Foreclosed Assets | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Foreclosed Assets: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial real estate | 1,352 | — | — | 1,352 | 1,726 | — | — | 1,726 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Residential | 394 | — | — | 394 | 55 | — | — | 55 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Loan servicing rights | 2,964 | — | 2,964 | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2016,2017, impaired commercial and commercial real estate loans had a principal amount of $26.4$38.6 million, with a valuation allowance of $8.0$10.1 million.
Other real estate owned and other repossessed property is measured at fair value less costs to sell and had a net carrying amount of $1.7$1.8 million at December 31, 2016.2017.
The valuation allowance for loan servicing rights with impairments at December 31, 2017 totaled $29 thousand.
The table below provides quantitative information about significant unobservable inputs used in fair value measurements within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy:
Valuation | Unobservable | Range (Weighted | Valuation | Unobservable | Range (Weighted | |||||||||||||||||||
(dollars in thousands) | Fair Value | Techniques | Input | Average) | Fair Value | Techniques | Input | Average) | ||||||||||||||||
March 31, 2017 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
March 31, 2018 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Collateral Dependent Impaired Loans | Collateral Dependent Impaired Loans |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial loans | $ | 5,461 | | Fair value of collateral |
| Discount for type of property, age of appraisal, and current status | 0% - 96% (48% | ) | $ | 2,453 | Fair value of collateral | Discount for type of property, age of appraisal, and current status | 25% - 35% (30%) | |||||||||||
Commercial real estate loans | 12,751 | | Fair value of collateral | | Discount for type of property, age of appraisal and current status | 14% - 67% (30% | ) | 15,267 | Fair value of collateral | Discount for type of property, age of appraisal and current status | 0% - 20% (10%) | |||||||||||||
Foreclosed Assets | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial real estate | 3,766 | | Fair value of collateral | | Discount for type of property, age of appraisal, and current status | 9% - 33% (18% | ) | 671 | Fair value of collateral | Discount for type of property, age of appraisal, and current status | 14% - 43% (25%) | |||||||||||||
Residential | 367 | | Fair value of collateral | | Discount for type of property, age of appraisal, and current status | 17% - 37% (25% | ) | 228 | Fair value of collateral | Discount for type of property, age of appraisal, and current status | 18% - 19% (18%) | |||||||||||||
December 31, 2016 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
December 31, 2017 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Collateral Dependent Impaired Loans | Collateral Dependent Impaired Loans |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial loans | $ | 6,771 | | Fair value of collateral | | Discount for type of property, age of appraisal, and current status | 0% - 99% (53% | ) | $ | 2,217 | Fair value of collateral | Discount for type of property, age of appraisal, and current status | 0% - 98% (49%) | |||||||||||
Commercial real estate loans | 11,632 | | Fair value of collateral | | Discount for type of property, age of appraisal, and current status | 10% - 67% (36% | ) | 26,319 | Fair value of collateral | Discount for type of property, age of appraisal and current status | 10% - 78% (32%) | |||||||||||||
Foreclosed Assets | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial real estate | 1,352 | | Fair value of collateral | | Discount for type of property, age of appraisal, and current status | 4% - 80% (39% | ) | 1,726 | Fair value of collateral | Discount for type of property, age of appraisal, and current status | 7% - 25% (18%) | |||||||||||||
Residential | 394 | | Fair value of collateral | | Discount for type of property, age of appraisal, and current status | 7% - 60% (30% | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Residential (1) | 55 | Fair value of collateral | Discount for type of property, age of appraisal, and current status | 39% |
(1) | There was only one foreclosed residential asset at December 31, 2017, so no range or weighted average rate is reported. |
Financial instruments recorded using fair value option
Under FASB ASC825-10, we may elect to report most financial instruments and certain other items at fair value on aninstrument-by instrument basis with changes in fair value reported in net income. After the initial adoption, the election is made at the acquisition of an eligible financial asset, financial liability or firm commitment or when certain specified reconsideration events occur. The fair value election may not be revoked once an election is made.
We have elected the fair value option for residential loans held for sale. For these loans, interest income is recorded in the consolidated statements of income based on the contractual amount of interest income earned on the financial assets (except any that are on nonaccrual status). None of these loans are 90 days or more past due, nor are any on nonaccrual status. Included in the income statement is interest income for loans held for sale totaling $22 thousand for the three months ended March 31, 2018 and $28 thousand for the three months ended March 31, 2017 and $22 thousand for the three months ended March 31, 2016.2017.
Residential loans held for sale
Old National has elected the fair value option for newly originated conforming fixed-rate and adjustable-rate first mortgage loans held for sale. These loans are intended for sale and are hedged with derivative instruments. Old National has elected the fair value option to mitigate accounting mismatches in cases where hedge accounting is complex and to achieve operational simplification. The fair value option was not elected for loans held for investment.
The difference between the aggregate fair value and the aggregate remaining principal balance for loans for which the fair value option has been elected at March 31, 20172018 and December 31, 20162017 was as follows:
Aggregate | Contractual | Aggregate | Contractual | |||||||||||||||||||||
(dollars in thousands) | Fair Value | Difference | Principal | Fair Value | Difference | Principal | ||||||||||||||||||
March 31, 2017 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
March 31, 2018 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Residential loans held for sale | $ | 17,373 | $ | 552 | $ | 16,821 | $ | 17,635 | $ | 577 | $ | 17,058 | ||||||||||||
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
December 31, 2016 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
December 31, 2017 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Residential loans held for sale | $ | 90,682 | $ | 133 | $ | 90,549 | $ | 17,930 | $ | 546 | $ | 17,384 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
Accrued interest at period end is included in the fair value of the instruments.
The following table presents the amount of gains and losses from fair value changes included in income before income taxes for financial assets carried at fair value:
Total Changes | Total Changes | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
in Fair Values | in Fair Values | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other | Included in | Other | Included in | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Gains and | Interest | Interest | Current Period | Gains and | Interest | Interest | Current Period | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
(dollars in thousands) | (Losses) | Income | (Expense) | Earnings | (Losses) | Income | (Expense) | Earnings | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Three months ended March 31, 2018 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Residential loans held for sale | $ | 35 | $ | — | $ | (4 | ) | $ | 31 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Three months ended March 31, 2017 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Residential loans held for sale | $ | 418 | $ | 1 | $ | — | $ | 419 | $ | 418 | $ | 1 | $ | — | $ | 419 | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Three months ended March 31, 2016 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Residential loans held for sale | $ | 371 | $ | 1 | $ | — | $ | 372 |
The carrying amounts and estimated fair values of financial instruments not previously presented in this note,carried at fair value on the balance sheet at March 31, 20172018 and December 31, 20162017 were as follows:
Fair Value Measurements at March 31, 2017 Using | Fair Value Measurements at March 31, 2018 Using | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Significant | Quoted Prices in | Significant | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Quoted Prices in | Other | Significant | Active Markets | Other | Significant | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Active Markets for | Observable | Unobservable | for Identical | Observable | Unobservable | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Carrying | Identical Assets | Inputs | Inputs | Carrying | Assets | Inputs | Inputs | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
(dollars in thousands) | Value | (Level 1) | (Level 2) | (Level 3) | Value | (Level 1) | (Level 2) | (Level 3) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Financial Assets | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash, due from banks, federal funds sold, and money market investments | $ | 217,035 | $ | 217,035 | $ | — | $ | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash, due from banks, money market, and other interest-earning investments | $ | 278,241 | $ | 278,241 | $ | — | $ | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investment securitiesheld-to-maturity: | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
U.S. government-sponsored entities and agencies | 40,021 | — | 40,110 | — | 73,369 | — | 71,444 | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mortgage-backed securities - Agency | 9,566 | — | 9,854 | — | 145,658 | — | 142,767 | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
State and political subdivisions | 691,861 | — | 734,942 | — | 316,126 | — | 321,932 | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Federal Home Loan Bank/Federal Reserve Bank stock | 107,501 | N/A | N/A | N/A | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
FHLB/Federal Reserve Bank stock | 136,206 | N/A | N/A | N/A | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Loans, net: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial | 1,888,428 | — | — | 1,967,837 | 2,792,038 | — | — | 2,727,325 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial real estate | 3,204,912 | — | — | 3,499,147 | 4,429,184 | — | — | 4,313,955 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Residential real estate | 2,110,526 | — | — | 2,248,048 | 2,156,769 | — | — | 2,135,119 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Consumer credit | 1,878,073 | — | — | 1,989,675 | 1,810,310 | — | — | 1,777,935 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Accrued interest receivable | 76,674 | 50 | 19,916 | 56,708 | 81,621 | 74 | 20,502 | 61,045 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Financial Liabilities | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Deposits: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Noninterest-bearing demand deposits | $ | 3,024,111 | $ | 3,024,111 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 3,655,732 | $ | 3,655,732 | $ | — | $ | — | ||||||||||||||||
NOW, savings, and money market deposits | 6,330,523 | 6,330,523 | — | — | 7,357,137 | 7,357,137 | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Time deposits | 1,466,718 | — | 1,457,966 | — | 1,775,731 | — | 1,771,277 | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Federal funds purchased and interbank borrowings | 61,016 | 61,016 | 150,026 | 150,026 | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase | 345,550 | 320,550 | 25,360 | — | 308,189 | 308,189 | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Federal Home Loan Bank advances | 1,441,030 | — | — | 1,448,233 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
FHLB advances | 1,664,179 | — | — | 1,658,911 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other borrowings | 219,021 | — | 217,808 | — | 248,898 | — | 251,538 | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Accrued interest payable | 4,004 | — | 4,004 | — | 5,388 | — | 5,388 | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Standby letters of credit | 349 | — | — | 349 | 408 | — | — | 408 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Off-Balance Sheet Financial Instruments | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Commitments to extend credit | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 3,363 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 3,225 | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
N/A = not applicable
Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2016 Using | Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2017 Using | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Significant | Quoted Prices in | Significant | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Quoted Prices in | Other | Significant | Active Markets | Other | Significant | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Active Markets for | Observable | Unobservable | for Identical | Observable | Unobservable | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Carrying | Identical Assets | Inputs | Inputs | Carrying | Assets | Inputs | Inputs | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
(dollars in thousands) | Value | (Level 1) | (Level 2) | (Level 3) | Value | (Level 1) | (Level 2) | (Level 3) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Financial Assets | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash, due from banks, federal funds sold, and money market investments | $ | 255,519 | $ | 255,519 | $ | — | $ | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash, due from banks, money market, and other interest-earning investments | $ | 290,432 | $ | 290,432 | $ | — | $ | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investment securitiesheld-to-maturity: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
U.S. government-sponsored entities and agencies | 40,131 | — | 40,558 | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mortgage-backed securities - Agency | 10,640 | — | 10,940 | — | 6,903 | — | 7,056 | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
State and political subdivisions | 694,319 | — | 732,674 | — | 677,160 | — | 720,647 | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Federal Home Loan Bank/Federal Reserve Bank stock | 101,716 | N/A | N/A | N/A | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
FHLB/Federal Reserve Bank stock | 119,686 | N/A | N/A | N/A | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Loans, net: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial | 1,895,618 | — | — | 1,971,296 | 2,698,023 | — | — | 2,707,385 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial real estate | 3,112,680 | — | — | 3,400,365 | 4,333,116 | — | — | 4,347,949 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Residential real estate | 2,085,887 | — | — | 2,228,542 | 2,165,290 | — | — | 2,210,951 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Consumer credit | 1,866,519 | — | — | 1,974,180 | 1,871,311 | — | — | 1,998,194 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Accrued interest receivable | 81,381 | 16 | 22,880 | 58,485 | 87,102 | 16 | 24,001 | 63,085 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Financial Liabilities | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Deposits: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Noninterest-bearing demand deposits | $ | 3,016,093 | $ | 3,016,093 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 3,680,807 | $ | 3,680,807 | $ | — | $ | — | ||||||||||||||||
NOW, savings, and money market deposits | 6,259,052 | 6,259,052 | — | — | 7,290,521 | 7,290,521 | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Time deposits | 1,468,108 | — | 1,460,778 | — | 1,634,436 | — | 1,620,685 | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Federal funds purchased and interbank borrowings | 213,003 | 213,003 | 335,033 | 335,033 | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase | 367,052 | 317,052 | 50,612 | — | 384,810 | 359,810 | 25,133 | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Federal Home Loan Bank advances | 1,353,092 | — | — | 1,360,599 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
FHLB advances | 1,609,579 | — | — | 1,607,189 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other borrowings | 218,939 | — | 217,647 | — | 248,782 | — | 250,443 | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Accrued interest payable | 5,979 | — | 5,979 | — | 7,029 | — | 7,029 | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Standby letters of credit | 315 | — | — | 315 | 351 | — | — | 351 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Off-Balance Sheet Financial Instruments | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Commitments to extend credit | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 2,527 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 2,449 | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
N/A = not applicable
The following methods and assumptions were used to estimate the fair value of each type of financial instrument.
Cash, due from banks, federal funds sold, and money market investments: For these instruments, the carrying amounts approximate fair value (Level 1).
Investment securities: Fair values for investment securitiesheld-to-maturity are based on quoted market prices, if available. For securities where quoted prices are not available, fair values are estimated based on market prices of similar securities (Level 2).
Federal Home Loan Bank and Federal Reserve Bank stock: Old National Bank is a member of the FHLB and the Federal Reserve System. The carrying value is our basis because it is not practical to determine the fair value due to restrictions placed on transferability.
Loans: The fair value of loans is estimated by discounting future cash flows using current rates at which similar loans would be made to borrowers with similar credit ratings and for the same remaining maturities (Level 3). The method utilized to estimate the fair value of loans doesfinancial instruments at December 31, 2017 did not necessarily represent an exit price.
Accrued interest receivable and payable: The carrying amount approximates fair value and is aligned In accordance with our adoption of ASU 2016-01 in 2018, the underlying assets or liabilities (Level 1, Level 2 or Level 3).
Deposits: Themethods utilized to measure the fair value of noninterest-bearing demand deposits and savings, NOW, and money market deposits is the amount payable as of the reporting date (Level 1). The fair value of fixed-maturity certificates of deposit is estimated using rates currently offered for deposits with similar remaining maturities (Level 2).
Federal funds purchased and interbank borrowings: Federal funds purchased and interbank borrowings generally have an original term to maturity of 30 days or less and, therefore, their carrying amount is a reasonable estimate of fair value (Level 1).
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase: The fair value of securities sold under agreements to repurchase is determined using end of day market prices (Level 1 or Level 2).
Federal Home Loan Bank advances: The fair value of FHLB advances is determined using calculated prices for new FHLB advances with similar risk characteristics (Level 3).
Other borrowings: The fair value of medium-term notes, subordinated debt, and senior bank notes is determined using market quotes (Level 2). The fair value of other debt is determined using comparable security market prices or dealer quotes (Level 2).
Standby letters of credit: Fair values for standby letters of credit are based on fees currently charged to enter into similar agreements. The fair value for standby letters of credit was recorded in “Accrued expenses and other liabilities” on the consolidated balance sheet in accordance with FASB ASC460-10 (FIN 45) (Level 3).
Off-balance sheet financial instruments: Fair values foroff-balance sheet credit-related financial instruments are based on fees currently charged to enter into similar agreements (Level 3). For further information regarding the amountsat March 31, 2018 represent an approximation of these financial instruments, see Notes 21 and 22.exit price, however, an actual exit price may differ.
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
ITEM 2. | MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS |
The following discussion is an analysis of our results of operations for the three months ended March 31, 20172018 and 2016,2017, and financial condition as of March 31, 2017,2018, compared to March 31, 20162017 and December 31, 2016.2017. This discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and related notes. This discussion contains forward-looking statements concerning our business that are based on estimates and involves certain risks and uncertainties. Therefore, future results could differ significantly from our current expectations and the related forward-looking statements.
The following table sets forth certain financial highlights of Old National:
Three Months Ended | ||||||||||||
(dollars and shares in thousands, | March 31, | December 31, | March 31, | |||||||||
except per share data) | 2018 | 2017 | 2017 | |||||||||
Income Statement: | ||||||||||||
Net interest income | $ | 128,572 | $ | 118,556 | $ | 105,801 | ||||||
Taxable equivalent adjustment (1) | 2,767 | 6,139 | 5,688 | |||||||||
Provision for loan losses | 380 | 1,037 | 347 | |||||||||
Noninterest income | 42,389 | 44,825 | 42,920 | |||||||||
Noninterest expense | 117,641 | 140,432 | 101,891 | |||||||||
Net income | 47,983 | (18,493 | ) | 35,992 | ||||||||
Common Share Data: | ||||||||||||
Weighted average diluted shares | 152,370 | 146,875 | 135,431 | |||||||||
Net income (diluted) | $ | 0.31 | $ | (0.13 | ) | $ | 0.27 | |||||
Cash dividends | 0.13 | 0.13 | 0.13 | |||||||||
Common dividend payout ratio (2) | 41 | % | N/M | 48 | % | |||||||
Book value | $ | 14.32 | $ | 14.17 | $ | 13.63 | ||||||
Stock price | 16.90 | 17.45 | 17.35 | |||||||||
Tangible common book value (3) | 8.55 | 8.37 | 8.54 | |||||||||
Performance Ratios: | ||||||||||||
Return on average assets | 1.10 | % | (0.45 | )% | 0.98 | % | ||||||
Return on average common equity | 8.86 | (3.51 | ) | 7.89 | ||||||||
Return on tangible common equity (3) | 15.62 | (5.12 | ) | 13.13 | ||||||||
Return on average tangible common equity (3) | 15.80 | (5.05 | ) | 13.38 | ||||||||
Net interest margin (3) | 3.45 | 3.47 | 3.50 | |||||||||
Efficiency ratio (3) | 65.94 | 81.60 | 64.66 | |||||||||
Net charge-offs (recoveries) to average loans | 0.01 | 0.03 | 0.01 | |||||||||
Allowance for loan losses to ending loans | 0.45 | 0.45 | 0.55 | |||||||||
Non-performing loans to ending loans | 1.28 | 1.30 | 1.43 | |||||||||
Balance Sheet: | ||||||||||||
Total loans | $ | 11,238,682 | $ | 11,118,121 | $ | 9,131,773 | ||||||
Total assets | 17,496,287 | 17,518,292 | 14,869,645 | |||||||||
Total deposits | 12,788,600 | 12,605,764 | 10,821,352 | |||||||||
Total borrowed funds | 2,371,292 | 2,578,204 | 2,066,617 | |||||||||
Total shareholders’ equity | 2,179,118 | 2,154,397 | 1,846,359 | |||||||||
Nonfinancial Data: | ||||||||||||
Full-time equivalent employees | 2,721 | 2,801 | 2,659 | |||||||||
Banking centers | 191 | 191 | 188 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/M = Not meaningful
(1) | Calculated using the federal statutory tax rate in effect of 21% for the three months ended March 31, 2018 and 35% for the three months ended December 31, 2017 and March 31, 2017. |
(2) | Cash dividends per share divided by net income per share (basic). |
(3) | Represents a non-GAAP financial measure. Refer to the “Non-GAAP Financial Measures” section for reconciliations to GAAP financial measures. |
Non-GAAP financial measures exclude certain items that are included in the financial results presented in accordance with GAAP. Management believes these non-GAAP financial measures enhance an investor’s understanding of the financial results of Old National by providing a meaningful basis for period-to-period comparisons, assisting in operating results analysis, and predicting future performance.
The following table presents GAAP to non-GAAP reconciliations.
Three Months Ended | ||||||||
(dollars and shares in thousands, | March 31, | |||||||
except per share data) | 2018 | 2017 | ||||||
Tangible common book value: | ||||||||
Shareholders’ equity (GAAP) | $ | 2,179,118 | $ | 1,846,359 | ||||
Deduct: Goodwill | 828,804 | 655,018 | ||||||
Intangible assets | 48,833 | 34,657 | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Tangible shareholders’ equity (non-GAAP) | $ | 1,301,481 | $ | 1,156,684 | ||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Period end common shares | 152,172 | 135,435 | ||||||
Tangible common book value | 8.55 | 8.54 | ||||||
Return on tangible common equity: | ||||||||
Net income (GAAP) | $ | 47,983 | $ | 35,992 | ||||
Add: Intangible amortization (net of tax) | 2,851 | 1,963 | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Tangible net income (non-GAAP) | $ | 50,834 | $ | 37,955 | ||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Tangible shareholders’ equity (non-GAAP) (see above) | $ | 1,301,481 | $ | 1,156,684 | ||||
Return on tangible common equity | 15.62 | % | 13.13 | % | ||||
Return on average tangible common equity: | ||||||||
Tangible net income (non-GAAP) (see above) | $ | 50,834 | $ | 37,955 | ||||
Average shareholders’ equity (GAAP) | $ | 2,166,055 | $ | 1,825,659 | ||||
Deduct: Average goodwill | 828,141 | 655,018 | ||||||
Average intangible assets | 51,092 | 36,097 | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Average tangible shareholders’ equity (non-GAAP) | $ | 1,286,822 | $ | 1,134,544 | ||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Return on average tangible common equity | 15.80 | % | 13.38 | % | ||||
Net interest margin: | ||||||||
Net interest income (GAAP) | $ | 128,572 | $ | 105,801 | ||||
Taxable equivalent adjustment | 2,767 | 5,688 | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Net interest income - taxable equivalent basis (non-GAAP) | $ | 131,339 | $ | 111,489 | ||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Average earning assets | $ | 15,205,891 | $ | 12,742,858 | ||||
Net interest margin | 3.45 | % | 3.50 | % | ||||
Efficiency ratio: | ||||||||
Noninterest expense (GAAP) | $ | 117,641 | $ | 101,891 | ||||
Deduct: Intangible amortization expense | 3,609 | 3,020 | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Adjusted noninterest expense (non-GAAP) | $ | 114,032 | $ | 98,871 | ||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Net interest income - taxable equivalent basis (non-GAAP) (see above) | $ | 131,339 | $ | 111,489 | ||||
Noninterest income | 42,389 | 42,920 | ||||||
Deduct: Net securities gains (losses) | 788 | 1,500 | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Adjusted total revenue (non-GAAP) | $ | 172,940 | $ | 152,909 | ||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Efficiency ratio | 65.94 | % | 64.66 | % | ||||
|
|
|
|
Non-GAAP financial measures have inherent limitations, are not required to be uniformly applied, and are not audited. Although these non-GAAP financial measures are frequently used by investors to evaluate a company, they have limitations as analytical tools, and should not be considered in isolation, or as a substitute for analyses of results as reported under GAAP. These non-GAAP measures are not necessarily comparable to similar measures that may be represented by other companies.
During the first quarter of 2017,2018, net income was $48.0 million, or $0.31 per diluted share. Net income was $36.0 million, or $0.27 per diluted share. Net income was $27.0 million, or $0.24 per diluted share, for the first quarter of 2016.2017.
Management’s primary focus remainsstrategy is basic banking – loan growth, fee income, and expense management: This is accomplished by executing our plan of revenue growth driven by strong commercial loan growth, anchored by excellent credit, fueled by low-cost core deposits, and reducing our operating expenses. In addition, we are seeing the results of our efforts to re-mix our earning assets by replacing lower yielding assets, like indirect auto loans, with higher yielding assets, like commercial loans. Our actions demonstrate our commitment to driving and sustaining positive operating leverage.
Loan Growth: Our loan balances, excluding loans held for sale, grew $121.3$120.6 million to $9.132$11.239 billion at March 31, 20172018 compared to $9.011$11.118 billion at December 31, 2016.2017. This higher yielding commercial loan growth was attributable to our commercial loan portfolios, as we continue to focus on organic loan growth during the quarter,coupled with our Wisconsin region experiencing the largest increase in loan balances. We are encouraged by the level ofstrong credit performance. Commercial loan demand experienced in the first quartercontinues to be steady as we execute our strategy of 2017, and our sales teams remain energized and committed to building new relationships throughout our entire footprint.
Fee Income: We remain keenly focused onRevenue growth in our fee revenue and are pleased to report a 45% increase in mortgage banking revenuesincome components for the three months ended March 31, 20172018 when compared to the three months ended March 31, 2016. This increase in mortgage banking revenue2017 was due to increased sales to the secondary market in 2017 and an increase in production attributable to our new associates in the Wisconsin region. The majority of fee income components increased year over year, driven by the acquisition of Anchor; however, these increases wereAnchor (MN) in November 2017, partially offset by the decrease in insurance premiums and commissions due to the sale of Old National’s insurance subsidiary in May 2016.lower capital markets income.
Expenses: Noninterest expenses remained well controlled, increasing $3.5increased $15.8 million, or 4%16%, for the three months ended March 31, 20172018 when compared to the three months ended March 31, 2016. This2017. The increase includes a $1.4 millionpre-tax chargewas primarily attributable to consolidate fifteen banking centers duringhigher expenses associated with the firstAnchor (MN) partnership. We are adapting to changing customer behaviors by continually investing in and improving the client experience by enhancing technology and processes. However, as previously disclosed, we have consolidated 148 branches since the beginning of 2011. Additionally, there are ten branches located throughout the footprint scheduled to be consolidated; nine in the second quarter and one in the third quarter of 2017.this year. In addition, Old National entered into a branch purchase and assumption agreement for the sale of ten Old National branches in Wisconsin to Marine Credit Union of La Crosse, Wisconsin. The branch sale includes the assumption of approximately $274 million in deposits and no loans. Subject to regulatory approval and other terms and conditions, the sale is expected to close in the third quarter of 2018. For the remainder of 2018, we are relentlessly evaluating the Old National franchise for additional consolidation opportunities.
Our thoughts regarding future partnerships is such that we remain an active looker and a selective, disciplined buyer. We are committedbelieve our ability to ongoing assessments of our servicebring an enhanced product set and delivery network, as part of our effortsa larger balance sheet with better capital allows a potential new market partner toright-size better serve their clients. However, given the ONBquality Old National franchise with the most efficient and effective branch network possible.that exists today, we do not feel compelled to enter into a partnership.
The following table sets forth certain income statement information of Old National for the three months ended March 31, 20172018 and 2016:2017:
Three Months Ended | Three Months Ended | |||||||||||||||||||||||
March 31, | % | March 31, | % | |||||||||||||||||||||
(dollars in thousands) | 2017 | 2016 | Change | 2018 | 2017 | Change | ||||||||||||||||||
Income Statement Summary: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net interest income | $ | 105,801 | $ | 85,643 | 23.5 | % | $ | 128,572 | $ | 105,801 | 21.5 | % | ||||||||||||
Provision for loan losses | 347 | 91 | 281.3 | 380 | 347 | 9.5 | ||||||||||||||||||
Noninterest income | 42,920 | 49,451 | (13.2 | ) | 42,389 | 42,920 | (1.2 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Noninterest expense | 101,891 | 98,355 | 3.6 | 117,641 | 101,891 | 15.5 | ||||||||||||||||||
Other Data: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Return on average common equity | 7.89 | % | 7.18 | % | 8.86 | % | 7.89 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Return on tangible common equity (1) | 15.62 | 13.13 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Return on average tangible common equity (1) | 15.80 | 13.38 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Efficiency ratio (1) | 64.66 | 68.76 | 65.94 | 64.66 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Tier 1 leverage ratio | 8.49 | 8.63 | 8.11 | 8.49 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Net charge-offs (recoveries) to average loans | 0.01 | 0.09 | 0.01 | 0.01 | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
(1) |
Net Interest Income
Net interest income is the most significant component of our earnings, comprising 71%75% of revenues for the three months ended March 31, 2017.2018. Net interest income and margin are influenced by many factors, primarily the volume and mix of earning assets, funding sources, and interest rate fluctuations. Other factors include the level of accretion income on purchased loans, prepayment risk on mortgage and investment-related assets, and the composition and maturity of earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities.
Interest rates increased in the first quarter of 2017, driven by improving economic conditions evidenced by theThe Federal Reserve increasingincreased the discount rate 25 basis points at their March 2018 meeting. The rate increase was driven by the Federal Reserve’s inflation and wage pressure expectations in conjunction with a moderately expanding economy. The Treasury yield curve flattened as short-term rates rose and intermediate andwhile long-term interest rates declined as the spread between short and longer duration Treasuries contracted.remained flat. Collectively, these factors improvemarginally improved the outlook for our net interest income and margin.
Loans typically generate more interest income than investment securities with similar maturities. Funding from client deposits generally costs less than wholesale funding sources. Factors such as general economic activity, Federal Reserve Board monetary policy, and price volatility of competing alternative investments, can also exert significant influence on our ability to optimize the mix of assets and funding and the net interest income and margin.
Net interest income is the excess of interest received from earning assets over interest paid on interest-bearing liabilities. For analytical purposes, net interest income is also presented in the table that follows, adjusted to a taxable equivalent basis to reflect what ourtax-exempt assets would need to yield in order to achieve the sameafter-tax yield as a taxable asset. We used the federal statutory tax rate in effect of 21% for the three months ended March 31, 2018, compared to 35% for all periods.the three months ended March 31, 2017. This analysis portrays the income tax benefits associated intax-exempt assets and helps to facilitate a comparison between taxable andtax-exempt assets. Management believes that it is a standard practice in the banking industry to present net interest margin and net interest income on a fully taxable equivalent basis. Therefore, management believes these measures provide useful information for both management and investors by allowing them to make peer comparisons.
Three Months Ended | ||||||||
March 31, | ||||||||
(dollars in thousands) | 2018 | 2017 | ||||||
Net interest income | $ | 128,572 | $ | 105,801 | ||||
Conversion to fully taxable equivalent | 2,767 | 5,688 | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Net interest income - taxable equivalent basis | $ | 131,339 | $ | 111,489 | ||||
|
|
|
| |||||
Average earning assets | $ | 15,205,891 | $ | 12,742,858 | ||||
Net interest margin | 3.38 | % | 3.32 | % | ||||
Net interest margin - taxable equivalent basis | 3.45 | % | 3.50 | % | ||||
|
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands) Net interest income Conversion to fully taxable equivalent Net interest income - taxable equivalent basis Average earning assets Net interest margin Net interest margin - taxable equivalent basis Three Months Ended March 31, 2017 2016 $ 105,801 $ 85,643 5,688 5,200 $ 111,489 $ 90,843 $ 12,742,858 $ 10,331,029 3.32 % 3.32 % 3.50 % 3.52 %
The increase in net interest income for the three months ended March 31, 2018 when compared to the three months ended March 31, 2017 was primarily due to higher average earning assets of $2.463 billion. Partially offsetting the higher average earning assets were higher average interest-bearing liabilities of $1.672 billion in the three months ended March 31, 2018 when compared to the three months ended March 31, 2017 and lower fully taxable equivalent interest income resulting from the income tax rate decrease to 21% in 2018. Net interest income for the three months ended March 31, 2018 and 2017 and 2016 includesincluded accretion income (interest income in excess of contractual interest income) associated with acquired loans. Excluding this accretionAccretion income net interest income on a fully taxable equivalent basis would have been $98.9totaled $11.0 million for the three months ended March 31, 2017, compared to $79.6 million for the three months ended March 31, 2016; and the net interest margin on a fully taxable equivalent basis would have been 3.10% for the three months ended March 31, 2017, compared to 3.08% for the three months ended March 31, 2016.
The increase in net interest income for the three months ended March 31, 2017 when compared to the three months ended March 31, 2016 was primarily due to an increase in average earning assets of $2.412 billion in the three months ended March 31, 2017 when2018, compared to $12.6 million in the three months ended March 31, 2016. Also contributing to the increase in net interest income was higher accretion income of $1.4 million associated with acquired loans reflecting the Anchor acquisition.2017. We expect accretion income on our purchased credit impairedPCI loans to decrease over time, but this may be offset by future acquisitions.
The following tables present the average balance sheet for each major asset and liability category, its related interest income and yield, or its expense and rate for the three months ended March 31, 2018 and 2017.
Three Months Ended | Three Months Ended | |||||||||||||||||||||||
(dollars in thousands) | March 31, 2018 | March 31, 2017 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Average | Income (1)/ | Yield/ | Average | Income (1)/ | Yield/ | |||||||||||||||||||
Balance | Expense | Rate | Balance | Expense | Rate | |||||||||||||||||||
Earning Assets | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Money market and other interest-earning investments | $ | 66,536 | $ | 90 | 0.55 | % | $ | 27,482 | $ | 31 | 0.46 | % | ||||||||||||
Investment securities: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Treasury and government sponsored agencies | 663,096 | 3,424 | 2.07 | % | 540,422 | 2,780 | 2.06 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Mortgage-backed securities | 1,632,610 | 9,520 | 2.33 | % | 1,511,388 | 7,818 | 2.07 | % | ||||||||||||||||
States and political subdivisions | 1,204,855 | 10,478 | 3.48 | % | 1,133,373 | 13,607 | 4.80 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Other securities | 459,458 | 3,669 | 3.19 | % | 445,235 | 2,828 | 2.54 | % | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||
Total investment securities | 3,960,019 | 27,091 | 2.74 | % | 3,630,418 | 27,033 | 2.98 | % | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||
Loans: (2) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial | 2,759,688 | 28,205 | 4.09 | % | 1,887,929 | 19,088 | 4.04 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Commercial real estate | 4,394,002 | 55,787 | 5.08 | % | 3,171,005 | 40,324 | 5.09 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Residential real estate loans | 2,176,413 | 21,472 | 3.95 | % | 2,141,571 | 21,254 | 3.97 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Consumer | 1,849,233 | 17,828 | 3.91 | % | 1,884,453 | 16,426 | 3.54 | % | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||
Total loans | 11,179,336 | 123,292 | 4.42 | % | 9,084,958 | 97,092 | 4.29 | % | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||
Total earning assets | 15,205,891 | $ | 150,473 | 3.97 | % | 12,742,858 | $ | 124,156 | 3.91 | % | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||
Less: Allowance for loan losses | (50,953 | ) | (50,710 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Non-earning Assets | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash and due from banks | 199,132 | 195,620 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Other assets | 2,089,790 | 1,877,849 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Total assets | $ | 17,443,860 | $ | 14,765,617 | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Interest-Bearing Liabilities | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
NOW accounts | $ | 3,067,437 | $ | 819 | 0.11 | % | $ | 2,585,814 | $ | 456 | 0.07 | % | ||||||||||||
Savings accounts | 3,052,646 | 1,343 | 0.18 | % | 2,969,866 | 1,157 | 0.16 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Money market accounts | 1,159,010 | 546 | 0.19 | % | 706,990 | 149 | 0.09 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Time deposits | 1,736,984 | 4,547 | 1.06 | % | 1,440,431 | 2,621 | 0.74 | % | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||
Total interest-bearing deposits | 9,016,077 | 7,255 | 0.33 | % | 7,703,101 | 4,383 | 0.23 | % | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||
Federal funds purchased and interbank borrowings | 261,353 | 1,017 | 1.58 | % | 189,070 | 356 | 0.76 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase | 342,682 | 359 | 0.42 | % | 331,400 | 256 | 0.31 | % | ||||||||||||||||
FHLB advances | 1,675,700 | 7,780 | 1.88 | % | 1,429,977 | 5,312 | 1.51 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Other borrowings | 248,828 | 2,723 | 4.38 | % | 218,965 | 2,360 | 4.31 | % | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||
Total borrowed funds | 2,528,563 | 11,879 | 1.91 | % | 2,169,412 | 8,284 | 1.55 | % | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||
Total interest-bearing liabilities | $ | 11,544,640 | $ | 19,134 | 0.67 | % | $ | 9,872,513 | $ | 12,667 | 0.52 | % | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||
Noninterest-Bearing Liabilities | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Demand deposits | $ | 3,563,104 | $ | 2,917,053 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Other liabilities | 170,061 | 150,392 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Shareholders’ equity | 2,166,055 | 1,825,659 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity | $ | 17,443,860 | $ | 14,765,617 | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Net interest rate spread | 3.30 | % | 3.39 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
Net interest margin (3) | 3.45 | % | 3.50 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
Taxable equivalent adjustment | $ | 2,767 | $ | 5,688 | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
(1) | Interest income is reflected on a fully taxable equivalent basis. |
(2) | Includes loans held for sale. |
(3) | Net interest margin is defined as net interest income on a tax equivalent basis as a percentage of average earning assets. |
The following table presents the dollar amount of changes in taxable equivalent net interest income attributable to changes in the average balances of assets and liabilities and the yields earned or rates paid for the three months ended March 31, 2018 and 2017.
From Three Months Ended | ||||||||||||
March 31, 2017 to Three | ||||||||||||
Months Ended March 31, 2018 | ||||||||||||
Total | Attributed to | |||||||||||
(dollars in thousands) | Change | Volume | Rate | |||||||||
Interest Income | ||||||||||||
Money market and other interest-earning investments | $ | 59 | $ | 49 | $ | 10 | ||||||
Investment securities (1) | 58 | 2,355 | (2,297 | ) | ||||||||
Loans (1) | 26,200 | 22,797 | 3,403 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
Total interest income | 26,317 | 25,201 | 1,116 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
Interest Expense | ||||||||||||
NOW deposits | 363 | 105 | 258 | |||||||||
Savings deposits | 186 | 34 | 152 | |||||||||
Money market deposits | 397 | 153 | 244 | |||||||||
Time deposits | 1,926 | 653 | 1,273 | |||||||||
Federal funds purchased and interbank borrowings | 661 | 206 | 455 | |||||||||
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase | 103 | 10 | 93 | |||||||||
FHLB advances | 2,468 | 1,023 | 1,445 | |||||||||
Other borrowings | 363 | 324 | 39 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
Total interest expense | 6,467 | 2,508 | 3,959 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
Net interest income | $ | 19,850 | $ | 22,693 | $ | (2,843 | ) | |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
The variance not solely due to rate or volume is allocated equally between the rate and volume variances.
(1) | Interest on investment securities and loans includes the effect of taxable equivalent adjustments of $1.7 million and $1.0 million, respectively, during the three months ended March 31, 2018 using the federal statutory rate in effect of 21%. |
The decrease in the net interest margin on a fully taxable equivalent basis for the three months ended March 31, 20172018 when compared to the three months ended March 31, 20162017 was primarily due to lower yields associated with accretion income on acquired loans, higher costs of interest bearinginterest-bearing liabilities, and a change in the mix of average interest earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities. The decrease in the net interest bearing liabilities. These decreases were partially offset by highermargin also reflected the change in the federal tax rate and the resulting decrease in our fully taxable equivalent interest rates on interest earning assets.income adjustments. Accretion income resulted in a 40represented 28 basis point contribution topoints of the net interest margin for the three months ended March 31, 2017,2018, compared to a 4440 basis point contribution topoints of the net interest margin for the three months ended March 31, 2016.2017. The yield on interest earning assets increased 36 basis points and the cost of interest-bearing liabilities increased 215 basis points in the quarterly year-over-year comparison. The yield on interest earning assets is calculated by dividing annualized taxable equivalent net interest income by average interest earning assets while the cost of interest-bearing liabilities is calculated by dividing annualized interest expense by average interest-bearing liabilities.
Average earning assets were $15.206 billion for the three months ended March 31, 2018, compared to $12.743 billion for the three months ended March 31, 2017, compared to $10.331 billion for the three months ended March 31, 2016, an increase of $2.412$2.463 billion, or 23%19%. The increase in average earning assets was primarily due to our acquisition of Anchor (MN) in May 2016.November 2017. The loan portfolio including loans held for sale, which generally has an average yield higher than the investment portfolio, was approximately 71%74% of average interest earning assets for the three months ended March 31, 2017,2018, compared to 68%71% for the three months ended March 31, 2016.2017.
Average loans including loans held for sale increased $2.111$2.094 billion for the three months ended March 31, 20172018 when compared to the three months ended March 31, 2016. The increase in average loans included2017 reflecting organic loan growth, as well as an increase attributable to loans acquired from Anchor (MN) in May 2016.November 2017. Loans including loans held for sale attributable to the Anchor (MN) acquisition totaled $1.647$1.595 billion as of the closing date of the acquisition.acquisition, which was November 1, 2017.
Average investments increased $317.7$329.6 million for the three months ended March 31, 20172018 when compared to the three months ended March 31, 20162017 reflecting the Anchor (MN) acquisition.
Averagenon-interest bearing noninterest-bearing deposits increased $444.0$646.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 20172018 when compared to the three months ended March 31, 2016 reflecting $311.9 million of averagenon-interest bearing
deposits from the Anchor acquisition.2017. Average interest bearinginterest-bearing deposits increased $1.771$1.313 billion for the three months ended March 31, 20172018 when compared to the three months ended March 31, 2016 reflecting $1.373 billion of2017. The increases in average interest bearing deposits fromalso reflected the Anchor (MN) acquisition.
Average borrowed funds increased $348.0$359.2 million for the three months ended March 31, 20172018 when compared to the three months ended March 31, 20162017 primarily due to increased funding needed as a result of growth in our investment and loan portfoliosportfolio that outpaced deposit growth.
Provision for Loan Losses
The provision for loan losses was $0.4 million for the three months ended March 31, 2018, compared to $0.3 million for the three months ended March 31, 2017, compared to $91 thousand for2017. Net charge-offs totaled $0.4 million during the three months ended March 31, 2016. Net2018, compared to net charge-offs totaledof $0.3 million during the three months ended March 31, 2017, compared to net charge-offs2017. The higher provision for loan losses is the result of $1.6 million during the three months ended March 31, 2016.loan growth, offset by lower incurred loss rate expectations. Continued loan growth in future periods, or a decline in our current level of recoveries, or an increase in charge-offs could result in an increase in provision expense.
Noninterest Income
We generate revenues in the form of noninterest income through client fees, sales commissions, and other gains and losses from our core banking franchise and other related businesses, such as wealth management, investment consulting, and investment products. NoninterestThe following table details the components in noninterest income for the three months ended March 31, 2017 was $42.9 million, a2018 and 2017:
Three Months Ended | ||||||||||||
March 31, | % | |||||||||||
(dollars in thousands) | 2018 | 2017 | Change | |||||||||
Wealth management fees | $ | 9,026 | $ | 8,999 | 0.3 | % | ||||||
Service charges on deposit accounts | 10,759 | 9,843 | 9.3 | |||||||||
Debit card and ATM fees | 4,865 | 4,236 | 14.8 | |||||||||
Mortgage banking revenue | 4,192 | 4,226 | (0.8 | ) | ||||||||
Investment product fees | 5,515 | 4,989 | 10.5 | |||||||||
Capital markets income | 498 | 1,031 | (51.7 | ) | ||||||||
Company-owned life insurance | 2,605 | 2,149 | 21.2 | |||||||||
Net securities gains (losses) | 788 | 1,500 | (47.5 | ) | ||||||||
Recognition of deferred gain on sale leaseback transactions | 395 | 537 | (26.4 | ) | ||||||||
Other income | 3,746 | 5,410 | (30.8 | ) | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
Total noninterest income | $ | 42,389 | $ | 42,920 | (1.2 | )% | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/M = Not meaningful
The decrease of $6.5 million, or 13%, compared to $49.5 millionin noninterest income for the three months ended March 31, 2016. The decrease in noninterest income2018 when compared to the three months ended March 31, 2017 was primarily due to lower insurance premiums and commissionsother income resulting from first quarter 2017 recoveries on loans originated by AnchorBank (WI) that had been fully charged-off prior to the sale of ONB Insurance Group, Inc. (“ONI”) in May 2016. The decrease in noninterest income was partiallyacquisition totaling $1.5 million and lower net securities gains. These decreases were substantially offset by higher noninterest income attributable to the Anchor (MN) acquisition.
Wealth managementService charges and overdraft fees increased $0.9 million for the three months ended March 31, 20172018 when compared to the three months ended March 31, 2016 reflecting2017 primarily due to higher personal trust fees, mutual fund fees, tax preparation fees, corporate trust fees, and fiduciary account fees.
Serviceservice charges and overdraft fees attributable to the Anchor (MN) acquisition.
Debit card and ATM fees increased $0.2$0.6 million for the three months ended March 31, 20172018 when compared to the three months ended March 31, 20162017 primarily due to service charges and overdraft feeshigher interchange income attributable to the Anchor acquisition, offset by lower overdraft charges.(MN) acquisition.
Debit card and ATMInvestment product fees increased $0.5 million for the three months ended March 31, 20172018 when compared to the three months ended March 31, 20162017 primarily due to the Anchor (MN) acquisition.
Mortgage banking revenueCapital markets income is comprised of customer interest rate swap fees, foreign currency exchange fees, and net gains (losses) on foreign currency adjustments. Capital markets income decreased $0.5 million for the three months ended March 31, 2018 when compared to the three months ended March 31, 2017 primarily due to lower customer interest rate swap fees.
Net securities gains decreased $0.7 million for the three months ended March 31, 2018 when compared to the three months ended March 31, 2017 primarily due to higher realized losses on available-for-sale securities in 2018, partially offset by higher realized gains on sales of available-for-sale securities in 2018.
Other income decreased $1.7 million for the three months ended March 31, 2018 when compared to the three months ended March 31, 2017 primarily due to lower other income resulting from first quarter 2017 recoveries on loans originated by AnchorBank (WI) that had been fully charged-off prior to the acquisition totaling $1.5 million and lower gains on sales of other real estate owned totaling $0.5 million.
Noninterest Expense
The following table details the components in noninterest expense for the three months ended March 31, 2018 and 2017:
Three Months Ended | ||||||||||||
March 31, | % | |||||||||||
(dollars in thousands) | 2018 | 2017 | Change | |||||||||
Salaries and employee benefits | $ | 64,179 | $ | 56,564 | 13.5 | % | ||||||
Occupancy | 13,280 | 12,134 | 9.4 | |||||||||
Equipment | 3,565 | 3,227 | 10.5 | |||||||||
Marketing | 3,697 | 3,050 | 21.2 | |||||||||
Data processing | 8,884 | 7,608 | 16.8 | |||||||||
Communication | 3,064 | 2,414 | 26.9 | |||||||||
Professional fees | 2,730 | 2,651 | 3.0 | |||||||||
Loan expense | 1,744 | 1,631 | 6.9 | |||||||||
Supplies | 722 | 579 | 24.7 | |||||||||
FDIC assessment | 2,645 | 2,487 | 6.4 | |||||||||
Other real estate owned expense | 349 | 1,115 | (68.7 | ) | ||||||||
Amortization of intangibles | 3,609 | 3,020 | 19.5 | |||||||||
Amortization of tax credit investments | 716 | — | N/M | |||||||||
Other expense | 8,457 | 5,411 | 56.3 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
Total noninterest expense | $ | 117,641 | $ | 101,891 | 15.5 | % | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/M = Not meaningful
Noninterest expense increased $15.8 million for the three months ended March 31, 2018 when compared to the three months ended March 31, 2017 primarily due to $11.6 million of operating expenses and $2.3 million of acquisition and integration costs associated with Anchor (MN). Also contributing to the increase in noninterest expense were higher impairments of long-lived assets of $2.8 million in the three months ended March 31, 2018 related to branch consolidations.
Salaries and benefits is the largest component of noninterest expense. Salaries and benefits increased $7.6 million for the three months ended March 31, 2018 when compared to the three months ended March 31, 2017 primarily due to $7.1 million of salaries and benefits associated with the Anchor (MN) acquisition. Also contributing to the increase in salaries and benefits was higher stock-based compensation expense of $0.6 million in the three months ended March 31, 2018.
Occupancy expenses increased $1.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2018 when compared to the three months ended March 31, 2017 primarily due to higher occupancy expenses attributable to the Anchor (MN) acquisition.
Marketing expense increased $0.6 million for the three months ended March 31, 2018 when compared to the three months ended March 31, 2017 primarily due to higher public relations expense.
Data processing expenses increased $1.3 million for the three months ended March 31, 20172018 when compared to the three months ended March 31, 20162017 primarily due to integration expenses associated with the Anchor (MN) acquisition.
Amortization of intangibles increased sales to the secondary market in 2017 and an increase in production largely attributable to our new associates in the Wisconsin region.
Insurance premiums and commissions decreased $13.0$0.6 million for the three months ended March 31, 20172018 when compared to the three months ended March 31, 2016 reflecting the sale of ONI in May 2016.
Investment product fees increased $1.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2017 when compared to the three months ended March 31, 2016 primarily due to amortization of core deposit intangibles related to the Anchor (MN) acquisition.
Other income increased $1.9 million for the three months ended March 31, 2017 when compared to the three months ended March 31, 2016. Included in the three months ended March 31, 2017Amortization of tax credit investments was $1.5 million of recoveries on Anchor loans that had been fullycharged-off prior to the acquisition. The increase in other income also reflected higher net gains on sales of foreclosed properties of $0.5 million.
Noninterest Expense
Noninterest expense for the three months ended March 31, 2017 totaled $101.9 million, an increase of $3.5 million, or 4%, from $98.4 million for the three months ended March 31, 2016. Noninterest expense for the three months ended March 31, 2017 was impacted by our transition into the higher growth markets in Wisconsin and the divestiture of our insurance business.
Salaries and benefits is the largest component of noninterest expense. For the three months ended March 31, 2017, salaries and benefits were $56.6 million, compared to $57.0 million for the three months ended March 31, 2016. Impacting salaries and benefits expense were the acquisition of Anchor and the divestiture described above. Also contributing to the decrease in salaries and benefits were lower pension expenses reflecting the termination of the Company’s Retirement Plan effective May 15, 2016.
Occupancy expenses decreased $0.7 million for the three months ended March 31, 2017 when compared to2018 reflecting the three months ended March 31, 2016 primarily due to branch consolidations incompletion of an investment tax credit project during the first quarter of 2017. The decrease2018. There was partially offset by occupancy expenses attributableno amortization related to the Anchor acquisition of $1.1 million.
Professional fees decreased $0.7 million for the three months ended March 31, 2017 when compared to the three months ended March 31, 2016 primarily due additional expensestax credit investments recorded in 2016 associated with the Anchor acquisition.
Other expense was $5.4 million for the three months ended March 31, 2017, compared to $3.9 million for the three months ended March 31, 2016. Included in othernoninterest expense for the three months ended March 31, 2017 were costs associated with January 2017 branch consolidations of $1.3 million.2017. We anticipate investment impairment charges related toamortization of tax credit investments of $4.4approximately $15 million to $18 million in the thirdsecond quarter of 20172018. The recognition of tax credit amortization expense is contingent upon the successful rehabilitation of the historic building or completion of a solar project within the reporting period. Many factors including weather, labor availability, building regulations, inspections, and $5.5 million in the fourth quarter of 2017 to be included in other expense. There were no investment impairment chargesunexpected construction delays related to tax credit investments for all of 2016 or for the three months ended March 31, 2017.a rehabilitation project can cause a project to exceed its estimated completion date. See Note 13 to the consolidated financial statements for additional information on the Company’sour tax credit investments.
Other expense increased $3.0 million for the three months ended March 31, 2018 when compared to the three months ended March 31, 2017 primarily due to higher impairments of long-lived assets totaling $2.8 million in the three months ended March 31, 2018 related to branch consolidations.
Provision for Income Taxes
We record a provision for income taxes currently payable and for income taxes payable or benefits to be received in the future, which arise due to timing differences in the recognition of certain items for financial statement and income tax purposes. The major difference between the effective tax rate applied to our financial statement income and the federal statutory tax rate is caused by interest ontax-exempt securities and loans. The provision for income taxes, as a percentage ofpre-tax income, was 9.4% for the three months ended March 31, 2018, compared to 22.6% for the three months ended March 31, 2017, compared to 26.4% for the three months ended March 31, 2016.2017. In accordance with ASC740-270,Accounting for Interim Reporting, the provision for income taxes was recorded at March 31, 20172018 based on the current estimate of the effective annual rate. The lower effective tax rate during the three months ended March 31, 20172018 when compared to the three months ended March 31, 2016 is2017 was primarily the result of the lowering of the federal corporate tax rate to 21% and an increase in federal tax credits available. See Note 1920 to the consolidated financial statements for additional information.
Overview
At March 31, 2017,2018, our assets were $14.870$17.496 billion, a $2.938$2.626 billion increase compared to assets of $11.932$14.870 billion at March 31, 2016,2017, and a $9.4$22.0 million increasedecrease compared to assets of $14.860$17.518 billion at December 31, 2016.2017. The increase from March 31, 20162017 to March 31, 20172018 was primarily due to the acquisition of Anchor (MN) in May 2016,November 2017, which had $2.166$2.222 billion in assets as of the closing date of the acquisition. Organic growth in our commercial loan portfolios also contributed to the March 31, 2017 to March 31, 2018 increase in assets.
Earning Assets
Our earning assets are comprised of investment securities, portfolio loans, loans held for sale, money market investments, interest earning accounts with the Federal Reserve, and trading securities. Earning assets were $12.852$15.239 billion at March 31, 2017,2018, a $2.493$2.387 billion increase compared to earning assets of $10.359$12.852 billion at March 31, 2016,2017, and a $55.9$30.1 million increase compared to earning assets of $12.796$15.209 billion at December 31, 2016.2017.
Investment Securities
We classify the majority of our investment securities asavailable-for-sale to give management the flexibility to sell the securities prior to maturity if needed, based on fluctuating interest rates or changes in our funding requirements. However, we also have $9.6$73.4 million of U.S. government-sponsored entities and agencies securities, $145.7 million of fixed-rate mortgage-backed securities, $40.0 million of U.S. government-sponsored entity and agency securities, and $691.9$316.1 million of state and political subdivision securities in ourheld-to-maturity investment portfolio at March 31, 2017.2018.
Trading securities, which consist of mutual funds held in trusts associated with deferred compensation plans for former directors and executives, are recorded at fair value and totaled $5.6 million at March 31, 2018 compared to $5.1 million at March 31, 2017 compared to $3.7 million at March 31, 2016. The increase was primarily due to the acquisition of Anchor, which had $0.9 million in trading securities as of the closing date of the acquisition.2017.
At March 31, 2017,2018, the investment securities portfolio, including trading securities, was $3.671$3.897 billion compared to $3.307$3.671 billion at March 31, 2016,2017, an increase of $363.7 million, or 11%.$225.8 million. Investment securities attributable to the Anchor (MN) acquisition totaled $239.8$308.8 million as of the closing date of the acquisition. Investment securities represented 29%26% of earning assets at March 31, 2017,2018, compared to 32%29% at March 31, 2016,2017 and 29%26% at December 31, 2016.2017. Investment securities also decreased as a percentage of total earning assets at March 31, 2018 when compared to March 31, 2017 due to a proportionately larger increase in loan balances. Stronger commercial loan demand in the future and management’s decision to deleverage the balance sheet could result in a reduction in the securities portfolio. At March 31, 2017,2018, management does not intend to sell any securities in an unrealized loss position and does not believe we will be required to sell such securities.
The investment securitiesavailable-for-sale portfolio had net unrealized losses of $69.0 million at March 31, 2018, compared to net unrealized losses of $47.2 million at March 31, 2017, compared to net unrealized gains of $10.9 million at March 31, 2016, and net unrealized losses of $61.5$56.4 million at December 31, 2016.2017. Net unrealized losses decreasedincreased from December 31, 20162017 to March 31, 20172018 reflecting higher net unrealized losses on mortgage-backed securities primarily due to a decreasethe effect of an increase in long-term interest rates on municipal bonds and mortgage-backed securities.rates.
The investment portfolio had an effective duration of 4.30 at March 31, 2018, compared to 4.53 at March 31, 2017, compared to 3.80 at March 31, 2016, and 4.614.15 at December 31, 2016.2017. Effective duration measures the percentage change in value of the portfolio in response to a change in interest rates. Generally, there is more uncertainty in interest rates over a longer average maturity, resulting in a higher duration percentage. The annualized average yields on investment securities, on a taxable equivalent basis, were 2.74% for the three months ended March 31, 2018, compared to 2.98% for the three months ended March 31, 2017, compared to 2.95% for the three months ended March 31, 2016, and 2.85% for the year ended December 31, 2016.2017.
Loans Held for Sale
Mortgage loans held for immediate sale in the secondary market were $17.4$17.6 million at March 31, 2017,2018, compared to $90.7$17.9 million at December 31, 2016.2017. Certain mortgage loans are committed for sale at or prior to origination at a contracted price to an outside investor. Other mortgage loans held for immediate sale are hedged with To Be Announced (“TBA”)TBA forward agreements and committed for sale when they are ready for delivery and remain on the Company’s balance sheet for a short period of time (typically 30 to 60 days). These loans are sold without recourse, beyond customary representations and warranties, and Old National has not experienced material losses arising from these sales. Mortgage originations are subject to volatility due to interest rates and home sales, among other factors.
We have elected the fair value option under FASB ASC825-10 (SFAS No. 159) prospectively for residential loans held for sale. The aggregate fair value exceeded the unpaid principal balance by $0.6 million at March 31, 2017 and March 31, 2016. The aggregate fair value exceeded the unpaid principal balance by $0.12018, compared to $0.5 million at December 31, 2016.2017.
Commercial and Commercial Real Estate Loans
Commercial and commercial real estate loans are the largest classification within earning assets, representing 40%48% of earning assets at March 31, 2017,2018, compared to 36%40% at March 31, 20162017 and 39%47% at December 31, 2016.2017. At March 31, 2017,2018, commercial and commercial real estate loans were $5.133$7.262 billion, an increase of $1.418$2.128 billion, or 38%42%, compared to March 31, 2016,2017, and an increase of $85.4$189.8 million, or 2%3%, compared to December 31, 2016.2017. Commercial and commercial real estate loans attributable to the Anchor (MN) acquisition totaled $968.6 million$1.516 billion as of the closing date of the acquisition.
Residential Real Estate Loans
At March 31, 2017,2018, residential real estate loans held in our loan portfolio were $2.112$2.159 billion, an increase of $462.3$46.3 million or 28%, compared to March 31, 2016,2017, and an increasea decrease of $24.7$8.5 million or 1%, compared to December 31, 2016.2017. Residential real estate loans attributable to the Anchor (MN) acquisition totaled $456.1$34.0 million as of the closing date of the acquisition. Future increases in interest rates could result in a decline in the level of refinancings and new originations.originations of residential real estate loans.
Consumer Loans
Consumer loans, including automobile loans, personal and home equity loans and lines of credit, and student loans, increased $244.8decreased $67.6 million or 15%, at March 31, 20172018 compared to March 31, 2016,2017, and increased $11.1decreased $60.7 million or 1%, from December 31, 2016.2017. Consumer loans attributable to the Anchor (MN) acquisition totaled $213.0$43.9 million as of the closing date of the acquisition. Management plansWe continue to slowsee runoff in our less profitable indirect consumer loan originations, which are least profitable, in 2017.
Premises and Equipment
Premises and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation, increased $222.8 million since March 31, 2016. During 2016, the Company purchased certain bank properties that it had previously leased, including its executive offices, for an aggregate purchase price of $196.1 million. Premises and equipment attributable to the Anchor acquisition totaled $35.7 million as of the closing date of the acquisition.portfolio.
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
Goodwill and other intangible assets at March 31, 20172018 totaled $689.7$877.6 million, an increase of $72.6$187.9 million compared to $617.1$689.7 million at March 31, 2016. During 2016,2017. As of March 31, 2018, we have recorded $132.9$200.4 million of goodwill and other intangible assets associated with the acquisition of Anchor. Also during 2016, Old National eliminated $47.7 million of goodwill and intangible assets associated with the sale of its insurance operations.Anchor (MN).
Net Deferred Tax Assets
Net deferred tax assets increased $66.7decreased $76.6 million sincecompared to March 31, 20162017 primarily due to a revaluation of our deferred tax assets due to the enactment of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (“H.R. 1”), which lowered the federal corporate tax rate to 21%. Shortly after the enactment date, the SEC issued SAB 118, which addresses the situations where the accounting for changes in tax laws is complete, incomplete but can be reasonably estimated, and incomplete and cannot be reasonably estimated. SAB 118 also permits a measurement period of up to one year from the date of enactment to refine the provisional accounting. During the three months ended March 31, 2018, the immaterial adjustments made to the preliminary valuation of assets acquired and liabilities assumed in the acquisition of Anchor. NetAnchor (MN) impacted our estimated revaluation of Old National’s deferred tax assets acquired fromassets. Old National continues to analyze H.R. 1, including the impact on alternative minimum tax credits, as well as the acquisition accounting of Anchor totaled $98.1 million, consisting primarily of deferred tax assets related(MN), and expects any refinements to federal and state net operating loss carryforwards and acquired loans.the provisional accounting to be complete in 2018. Future decreaseschanges in the corporate tax rate could result in a losschange in value of Old National’s deferred tax assets but would reduceand future income tax expense. See Note 1920 to the consolidated financial statements for additional information.
Other Assets
Other assets increased $11.4$48.3 million, or 10%39%, since March 31, 20162017 primarily due to higher accrued income taxes and an increase in lowvarious tax credit investments. Other assets increased $16.6 million, or 11%, since December 31, 2017 primarily due to higher accrued income housing partnership investments. Offsettingtaxes. Old National reclassified $22.6 million from deferred tax assets related to alternative minimum tax credits to accrued income taxes in the increase were lower deferred rent payments resulting fromfirst quarter of 2018 as a result of the purchaseenactment of certain bank properties that were previously leased and lower derivative assets.H.R. 1. See Note 20 to the consolidated financial statements for additional information.
Funding
Total funding, comprised of deposits and wholesale borrowings, was $15.160 billion at March 31, 2018, an increase of $2.272 billion from $12.888 billion at March 31, 2017, an increase of $2.637 billion from $10.251 billion at March 31, 2016, and a decrease of $7.4$24.1 million from $12.895$15.184 billion at December 31, 2016.2017. Included in total funding were deposits of $12.789 billion at March 31, 2018, an increase of $1.968 billion from $10.821 billion at March 31, 2017, an increase of $2.232 billion from $8.589 billion at March 31, 2016, and an increase of $78.1$182.8 million from $10.743$12.606 billion at December 31, 2016.2017. Deposits attributable to the Anchor (MN) acquisition totaled $1.853$1.777 billion as of the closing date of the acquisition. Noninterest-bearing deposits increased $532.3$631.6 million from March 31, 20162017 to March 31, 2017.2018. NOW deposits increased $456.6$500.5 million from March 31, 20162017 to March 31, 2017,2018, while savings deposits increased $726.6$93.2 million. Money market deposits increased $136.0$433.0 million from March 31, 20162017 to March 31, 2017,2018, while time deposits increased $380.9$309.0 million.
We use wholesale funding to augment deposit funding and to help maintain our desired interest rate risk position. At March 31, 2017,2018, wholesale borrowings, including federal funds purchased and interbank borrowings, securities sold under agreements to repurchase, Federal Home Loan BankFHLB advances, and other borrowings, totaled $2.067$2.371 billion, an increase of $404.4$304.7 million, or 24%15%, from March 31, 2016,2017, and a decrease of $85.5$206.9 million, or 4%8%, from December 31, 2016.2017. Wholesale funding as a percentage of total funding was 16% at March 31, 2017,2018, 16% at March 31, 2016,2017, and 17% at December 31, 2016.2017. The increase in wholesale funding from March 31, 20162017 to March 31, 20172018 was primarily due to an increaseincreases in Federal Home Loan BankFHLB advances, federal funds purchased and interbank borrowings, and other borrowings, partially offset by a decrease in federal funds purchased and interbank borrowings.securities sold under agreements to repurchase.
Accrued Expenses and Other Liabilities
Accrued expenses and other liabilities decreased $37.3increased $22.0 million, or 22%16%, from March 31, 20162017 primarily due to lower deferred gain on sale leaseback transactions, derivative liabilities, and accrued pension expenses. Offsetting the decrease was an increase in unfunded commitments on low income housing partnershipvarious tax credit investments. Accrued expenses and other liabilities decreased $15.2$22.7 million, or 10%13%, from December 31, 20162017 primarily due to incentive and severance payments in the first quarter of 2017.2018.
Capital
Shareholders’ equity totaled $2.179 billion at March 31, 2018, compared to $1.846 billion at March 31, 2017 compared to $1.509 billion at March 31, 2016 and $1.814$2.154 billion at December 31, 2016.2017. Shareholders’ equity at MarchDecember 31, 2017 included $273.6$300.8 million from the 20.416.5 million shares of common stockCommon Stock that were issued in conjunction with the acquisition of Anchor. The change in unrealized gains (losses) on investment securities increased equity by $9.3 million during the three months ended March 31, 2017.Anchor (MN). We paid cash dividends of $0.13 per share for the three months ended March 31, 2017,2018, which reduced equity by $17.6$19.8 million. The Company’s Common Stock is traded on the NASDAQ under the symbol “ONB” with 34,547 shareholders of record at March 31, 2018.
Capital Adequacy
Old National and the banking industry are subject to various regulatory capital requirements administered by the federal banking agencies. At March 31, 2017,2018, Old National and its bank subsidiary exceeded the regulatory minimums and Old National Bank met the regulatory definition of well-capitalized based on the most recent regulatory definition.
At March 31, 2017,2018, Old National’s consolidated capital position remains strong as evidenced by the following comparisons of key industry ratios.
Fully Phased-In Regulatory Guidelines | March 31, | December 31, | Fully Phased-In Regulatory Guidelines | March 31, | December 31, | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Minimum | 2017 | 2016 | 2016 | Minimum | 2018 | 2017 | 2017 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Risk-based capital: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tier 1 capital to total average assets (leverage ratio) | 4.00 | % | 8.49 | % | 8.63 | % | 8.43 | % | 4.00 | % | 8.11 | % | 8.49 | % | 8.28 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Common equity Tier 1 capital to risk-adjusted total assets | 7.00 | 11.43 | 12.04 | 11.51 | 7.00 | 10.71 | 11.43 | 10.39 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tier 1 capital to risk-adjusted total assets | 8.50 | 11.72 | 12.52 | 11.65 | 8.50 | 10.71 | 11.72 | 10.39 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total capital to risk-adjusted total assets | 10.50 | 12.24 | 13.22 | 12.18 | 10.50 | 11.72 | 12.24 | 11.40 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Shareholders’ equity to assets | N/A | 12.42 | 12.64 | 12.21 | N/A | 12.45 | 12.42 | 12.30 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
N/A = not applicable
At March 31, 2017,2018, Old National Bank, Old National’s bank subsidiary, maintained a strong capital position as evidenced by the following comparisons of key industry ratios.
Fully Phased-In | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fully Phased-In Regulatory Guidelines | Well Capitalized | March 31, | December 31, | Regulatory Guidelines | Well Capitalized | March 31, | December 31, | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Minimum | Guidelines | 2017 | 2016 | 2016 | Minimum | Guidelines | 2018 | 2017 | 2017 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Risk-based capital: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tier 1 capital to total average assets (leverage ratio) | 4.00 | % | 5.00 | % | 8.73 | % | 9.34 | % | 8.55 | % | 4.00 | % | 5.00 | % | 8.78 | % | 8.73 | % | 8.93 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
Common equity Tier 1 capital to risk-adjusted total assets | 7.00 | 6.50 | 12.03 | 13.54 | 11.83 | 7.00 | 6.50 | 11.60 | 12.03 | 11.21 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tier 1 capital to risk-adjusted total assets | 8.50 | 8.00 | 12.03 | 13.54 | 11.83 | 8.50 | 8.00 | 11.60 | 12.03 | 11.21 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total capital to risk-adjusted total assets | 10.50 | 10.00 | 12.55 | 14.25 | 12.35 | 10.50 | 10.00 | 12.13 | 12.55 | 11.73 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act requires bank holding companies and any subsidiary banks with consolidated assets of more than $10 billion and less than $50 billion, including Old National, to complete and publicly disclose annual stress tests. The objective of the stress test is to ensure that the financial institution has capital planning processes that account for its unique risks, and to help ensure that the institution has sufficient capital to continue operations throughout times of economic and financial stress. The stress tests are conducted with baseline, adverse, and severely adverse economic scenarios. Old National completed its annual stress test that covered a nine-quarter planning horizon beginning January 1, 20162017 and ending on March 31, 20182019 and publicly disclosed a summary of the stress test results on October 25, 2016.24, 2017. The stress test showed that Old National would maintain capital levels well above the regulatory guideline minimum levels for all periods and under all stress test scenarios.
Overview
Old National has adopted a Risk Appetite Statement to enable the Board of Directors, Executive Leadership Group, and Senior Management to better assess, understand, and mitigate the risks of the Company.Old National. The Risk Appetite Statement addresses the following major risks: strategic, market, liquidity, credit, operational/technology,technology/cyber, regulatory/compliance/legal, reputational, and human resources. Our Chief Risk Officer is independent of management and reports directly to the Chair of the Board’s Enterprise Risk Management Committee. The following discussion addresses three of these major risks: credit, market, liquidity, operational/technology/cyber, and liquidity.regulatory/compliance/legal.
Credit Risk
Credit risk represents the risk of loss arising from an obligor’s inability or failure to meet contractual payment or performance terms. Our primary credit risks result from our investment and lending activities.
Investment Activities
We carry a higher exposure to loss in our pooled trust preferred securities, which are collateralized debt obligations, due to illiquidity in that market and the performance of the underlying collateral. At March 31, 2017,2018, we had pooled trust preferred securities with a fair value of $8.3$8.2 million, or less than 1% of theavailable-for-sale securities portfolio. These securities remained classified asavailable-for-sale and at March 31, 2017,2018, the unrealized loss on our pooled trust preferred securities was approximately $8.6$5.7 million. The fair value of these securities should improve as we get closer to maturity.maturity, but not in all cases. During the first quarter of 2018, Old National sold a pooled trust security for proceeds of $1.8 million, which resulted in a loss of $0.9 million. There was no other-than-temporary-impairmentOTTI recorded during the three months ended March 31, 20172018 or 2016.2017.
All of our mortgage-backed securities are backed by U.S. government-sponsored or federal agencies. Municipal bonds, corporate bonds, and other debt securities are evaluated by reviewing the credit-worthiness of the issuer and general market conditions. See Note 6 to the consolidated financial statements for additional details about our investment security portfolio.
Counterparty Exposure
Counterparty exposure is the risk that the other party in a financial transaction will not fulfill its obligation. We define counterparty exposure as nonperformance risk in transactions involving federal funds sold and purchased, repurchase agreements, correspondent bank relationships, and derivative contracts with companies in the financial services industry. Old National manages exposure to counterparty risk in connection with its derivatives transactions by generally engaging in transactions with counterparties having ratings of at least A by Standard & Poor’s Rating Service or A2 by Moody’s Investors Service. Total credit exposure is monitored by counterparty and managed within limits that management believes to be prudent. Old National’s net counterparty exposure was an asset of $530.3$458.7 million at March 31, 2017.2018.
Lending Activities
Commercial
Commercial and industrial loans are made primarily for the purpose of financing equipment acquisition, expansion, working capital, and other general business purposes. Lease financing consists of direct financing leases and are used by commercial customers to finance capital purchases ranging from computer equipment to transportation equipment. The credit decisions for these transactions are based upon an assessment of the overall financial capacity of the applicant. A determination is made as to the applicant’s ability to repay in accordance with the proposed terms as well as an overall assessment of the risks involved. In addition to an evaluation of the applicant’s financial condition, a determination is made of the probable adequacy of the primary and secondary sources of repayment, such as additional collateral or personal guarantees, to be relied upon in the transaction. Credit agency reports of the applicant’s credit history supplement the analysis of the applicant’s creditworthiness.
Commercial mortgages and construction loans are offered to real estate investors, developers, and builders primarily domiciled in the geographic market areas we serve: Indiana, Kentucky, Michigan, Wisconsin, and Wisconsin.Minnesota. These loans are secured by first mortgages on real estate atloan-to-value (“LTV”) LTV margins deemed appropriate for the property type, quality, location, and sponsorship. Generally, these LTV ratios do not exceed 80%. The commercial properties are predominantlynon-residential properties such as retail centers, apartments, industrial properties and, to a lesser extent, more specialized properties. Substantially all of our commercial real estate loans are secured by properties located in our primary market area.
In the underwriting of our commercial real estate loans, we obtain appraisals for the underlying properties. Decisions to lend are based on the economic viability of the property and the creditworthiness of the borrower. In evaluating a proposed commercial real estate loan, we primarily emphasize the ratio of the property’s projected net cash flows to the loan’s debt service requirement. The debt service coverage ratio normally is not less than 120% and it is computed after deduction for a vacancy factor and property expenses as appropriate. In addition, a personal guarantee of the loan or a portion thereof is often required from the principal(s) of the borrower. In most cases, we require title insurance insuring the priority of our lien, fire, and extended coverage casualty insurance, and flood insurance, if appropriate, in order to protect our security interest in the underlying property. In addition, business interruption insurance or other insurance may be required.
Construction loans are underwritten against projected cash flows derived from rental income, business income from an owner-occupant, or the sale of the property to anend-user. We may mitigate the risks associated with these types of loans by requiring fixed-price construction contracts, performance and payment bonding, controlled disbursements, andpre-sale contracts orpre-lease agreements.
Consumer
We offer a variety of first mortgage and junior lien loans to consumers within our markets, with residential home mortgages comprising our largest consumer loan category. These loans are secured by a primary residence and are underwritten using traditional underwriting systems to assess the credit risks of the consumer. Decisions are primarily based on LTV ratios,debt-to-income (“DTI”) DTI ratios, liquidity, and credit scores. A maximum LTV ratio of 80% is generally required, although higher levels are permitted with mortgage insurance or other mitigating factors. We offer fixed rate mortgages and variable rate mortgages with interest rates that are subject to change every year after the first, third, fifth, or seventh year, depending on the product and are based on fully-indexed rates such as the London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”).LIBOR. We do not offer payment-option facilities,sub-prime loans, or any product with negative amortization.
Home equity loans are secured primarily by second mortgages on residential property of the borrower. The underwriting terms for the home equity product generally permits borrowing availability, in the aggregate, up to 90% of the appraised value of the collateral property at the time of origination. We offer fixed and variable rate home equity loans, with variable rate loans underwritten at fully-indexed rates. Decisions are primarily based on LTV ratios, DTI ratios, and credit scores. We do not offer home equity loan products with reduced documentation.
Automobile loans include loans and leases secured by new or used automobiles. We originate automobile loans and leases primarily on an indirect basis through selected dealerships. We require borrowers to maintain collision insurance on automobiles securing consumer loans, with us listed as loss payee. Our procedures for underwriting automobile loans include an assessment of an applicant’s overall financial capacity, including credit history and the ability to meet existing obligations and payments on the proposed loan. Although an applicant’s creditworthiness is the primary consideration, the underwriting process also includes a comparison of the value of the collateral security to the proposed loan amount.
We assumed student loans in the acquisition of Anchor (WI) in May 2016. At March 31, 2017, studentStudent loans totaled $74.6 million and are guaranteed by the government from 97% to 100%. and totaled $66.0 million at March 31, 2018, compared to $68.2 million at December 31, 2017.
Asset Quality
Community-based lending personnel, along with region-based independent underwriting and analytic support staff, extend credit under guidelines established and administered by our Enterprise Risk Committee. This committee, which meets quarterly, is made up of outside directors. The committee monitors credit quality through its review of information such as delinquencies, credit exposures, peer comparisons, problem loans, and charge-offs. In addition, the committee reviews and approves recommended loan policy changes to assure it remains appropriate for the current lending environment.
We lend primarily to small- andmedium-sized commercial and commercial real estate clients in various industries including manufacturing, agribusiness, transportation, mining, wholesaling, and retailing. Old National manages concentrations of credit exposure by industry, product, geography, customer relationship, and loan size, with no concentrationsize. While loans to lessors of loans exceedingboth residential and non-residential real estate exceed 10% of its portfolio.total loans, no individual sub-segment category within those broader categories reach the 10% threshold. At March 31, 2017,2018, we had minimal exposure to foreign borrowers and no sovereign debt. Our policy is to concentrate our lending activity in the geographic market areas we serve, primarily Indiana, Kentucky, Michigan, Wisconsin, and Wisconsin.Minnesota. We are experiencing a slow and gradual improvement in the economy of our principal markets. Management expects that trends in under-performing, criticized, and classified loans will be influenced by the degree to which the economy strengthens or weakens.
On MayNovember 1, 2016,2017, Old National closed on its acquisition of Anchor.Anchor (MN). As of the closing date of the acquisition, loans totaled $1.638$1.594 billion and other real estate owned totaled $17.3$1.1 million. In accordance with accounting for business combinations, there was no allowance brought forward on any of the acquired loans, as the credit losses evident in the loans were included in the determination of the fair value of the loans at the acquisition date. Old National reviewed the acquired loans and determined that atas of March 31, 2017, $16.92018, $51.3 million met the definition of criticized and $45.6$34.3 million were considered classified (of which $25.1$18.4 million are reported with nonaccrual loans). Our current preference would be to work these loans and avoid foreclosure actions unless additional credit deterioration becomes apparent. These acquired impaired loans, along with $6.5$0.8 million of other real estate owned, are included in our summary of under-performing, criticized, and classified assets found below.
Summary of under-performing, criticized and classified assets:
March 31, | December 31, | March 31, | December 31, | |||||||||||||||||||||
(dollars in thousands) | 2017 | 2016 | 2016 | 2018 | 2017 | 2017 | ||||||||||||||||||
Nonaccrual loans: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial | $ | 36,686 | $ | 49,666 | $ | 56,585 | $ | 33,175 | $ | 36,686 | $ | 27,202 | ||||||||||||
Commercial real estate | 48,391 | 43,690 | 44,026 | 60,403 | 48,391 | 62,425 | ||||||||||||||||||
Residential real estate | 17,816 | 14,215 | 17,674 | 21,137 | 17,816 | 22,171 | ||||||||||||||||||
Consumer | 12,484 | 4,431 | 13,122 | 12,581 | 12,484 | 13,129 | ||||||||||||||||||
Covered loans (1) | — | 5,864 | — | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||
Total nonaccrual loans (2) | 115,377 | 117,866 | 131,407 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Renegotiated loans not on nonaccrual: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Noncovered loans | 14,969 | 14,022 | 14,376 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Covered loans (1) | — | 133 | — | |||||||||||||||||||||
Total nonaccrual loans (1) | 127,296 | 115,377 | 124,927 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Renegotiated loans not on nonaccrual | 16,802 | 14,969 | 19,589 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Past due loans (90 days or more and still accruing): | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial | — | — | 23 | 10 | — | 144 | ||||||||||||||||||
Commercial real estate | 80 | 80 | — | — | 80 | — | ||||||||||||||||||
Residential real estate | 2 | 150 | 2 | 16 | 2 | — | ||||||||||||||||||
Consumer | 299 | 127 | 303 | 301 | 299 | 750 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||
Total past due loans | 381 | 357 | 328 | 327 | 381 | 894 | ||||||||||||||||||
Other real estate owned | 12,547 | 7,019 | 18,546 | 6,735 | 12,547 | 8,810 | ||||||||||||||||||
Other real estate owned, covered (1) | — | 6,503 | — | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||
Total under-performing assets | $ | 143,274 | $ | 145,900 | $ | 164,657 | $ | 151,160 | $ | 143,274 | $ | 154,220 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||
Classified loans (includes nonaccrual, renegotiated, past due 90 days, and other problem loans) | $ | 219,929 | $ | 193,261 | $ | 220,429 | $ | 245,746 | $ | 219,929 | $ | 226,583 | ||||||||||||
Classified loans, covered (1) | — | 7,036 | — | |||||||||||||||||||||
Other classified assets (3) | 7,306 | 6,566 | 7,063 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Other classified assets (2) | 2,987 | 7,306 | 4,556 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Criticized loans | 95,881 | 130,948 | 95,462 | 174,873 | 95,881 | 188,085 | ||||||||||||||||||
Criticized loans, covered (1) | — | 1,527 | — | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||
Total criticized and classified assets | $ | 323,116 | $ | 339,338 | $ | 322,954 | $ | 423,606 | $ | 323,116 | $ | 419,224 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||
Asset Quality Ratios: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Non-performing loans/total loans (4) (5) | 1.43 | % | 1.88 | % | 1.62 | % | ||||||||||||||||||
Under-performing assets/total loans and other real estate owned (4) | 1.57 | 2.08 | 1.82 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Non-performing loans/total loans (3) (4) | 1.28 | % | 1.43 | % | 1.30 | |||||||||||||||||||
Under-performing assets/total loans and other real estate owned (3) | 1.34 | 1.57 | 1.39 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Under-performing assets/total assets | 0.96 | 1.22 | 1.11 | 0.86 | 0.96 | 0.88 | ||||||||||||||||||
Allowance for loan losses/under-performing assets (6) | 34.78 | 34.75 | 30.25 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Allowance for loan losses/nonaccrual loans (2) | 43.19 | 43.01 | 37.90 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Allowance for loan losses/under-performing assets (5) | 33.33 | 34.78 | 32.67 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Allowance for loan losses/nonaccrual loans (1) | 39.58 | 43.19 | 40.33 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
(1) |
Includes purchased credit impaired loans of approximately $11.5 million at March 31, 2018, $9.9 million at March 31, 2017, |
Includes |
Loans exclude loans held for sale. |
Non-performing loans include nonaccrual and renegotiated loans. |
Because the acquired loans were recorded at fair value in accordance with ASC 805 at the date of acquisition, the credit risk is incorporated in the fair value recorded. No allowance for loan losses is recorded on the acquisition date. |
Under-performing assets totaled $151.2 million at March 31, 2018, compared to $143.3 million at March 31, 2017 compared to $145.9 million at March 31, 2016 and $164.7$154.2 million at December 31, 2016.2017. Under-performing assets as a percentage of total loans and other real estate owned at March 31, 20172018 were 1.57%1.34%, a decrease of 5123 basis points from 2.08%1.57% at March 31, 20162017 and a decrease of 255 basis points from 1.82%1.39% at December 31, 2016.2017.
Nonaccrual loans decreasedincreased from March 31, 20162017 primarily due to a decrease in nonaccrual commercial loans, partially offset an increase in nonaccrual commercial real estate residential real estate, and consumer loans. Nonaccrual loans at March 31, 2017 included $25.12018 include $18.4 million of loans related to the Anchor (MN) acquisition. As a percentage of nonaccrual loans, the allowance for loan losses was 39.58% at March 31, 2018, compared to 43.19% at March 31, 2017 compared to 43.01% at March 31, 2016 and 37.90%40.33% at December 31, 2016. Purchased credit impaired2017. PCI loans that were included in the nonaccrual category because the collection of principal or interest is doubtful totaled $11.5 million at March 31, 2018, compared to $9.9 million at March 31, 2017 compared to $11.8 million at March 31, 2016 and $16.7$12.6 million at December 31, 2016.2017. However, they are accounted for under FASB ASC310-30 and accordingly treated as performing assets. We would expect our nonaccrual loans to remain at elevated levels until management can work through and resolve these purchased credit impaired loans.
Total criticized and classified assets were $323.1$423.6 million at March 31, 2017, a decrease2018, an increase of $16.2$100.5 million from March 31, 2016,2017, and an increase of $0.2$4.4 million from December 31, 2016.2017. Other classified assets include investment securities that fell below investment grade rating totaling $3.0 million at March 31, 2018, compared to $7.3 million at March 31, 2017 compared to $6.6 million at March 31, 2016 and $7.1$4.6 million at December 31, 2016.2017.
Old National may choose to restructure the contractual terms of certain loans. The decision to restructure a loan, versus aggressively enforcing the collection of the loan, may benefit Old National by increasing the ultimate probability of collection.
Any loans that are modified are reviewed by Old National to identify if a troubled debt restructuring (“TDR”)TDR has occurred, which is when, for economic or legal reasons related to a borrower’s financial difficulties, theOld National Bank grants a concession to the borrower that it would not otherwise consider. Terms may be modified to fit the ability of the borrower to repay in line with its current financial status. The modification of the terms of such loans include one or a combination of the following: a reduction of the stated interest rate of the loan, an extension of the maturity date at a stated rate of interest lower than the current market rate of new debt with similar risk, or a permanent reduction of the recorded investment of the loan.
Loans modified in a TDR are typically placed on nonaccrual status until we determine the future collection of principal and interest is reasonably assured, which generally requires that the borrower demonstrate a period of performance according to the restructured terms for six months.
If we are unable to resolve a nonperforming loan issue, the credit will be charged off when it is apparent there will be a loss. For large commercial type loans, each relationship is individually analyzed for evidence of apparent loss based on quantitative benchmarks or subjectively based upon certain events or particular circumstances. Generally, Old National charges off small commercial loans scored through our small business credit center with contractual balances under $250,000 that have been placed on nonaccrual status or becameare 90 days or more delinquent without regard to theand do not have adequate collateral position.support. For residential and consumer loans, a charge off is recorded at the time foreclosure is initiated or when the loan becomes 120 to 180 days past due, whichever is earlier.
For commercial TDRs, an allocated reserve is established within the allowance for loan losses for the difference between the carrying value of the loan and its computed value. To determine the value of the loan, one of the following methods is selected: (1) the present value of expected cash flows discounted at the loan’s original effective interest rate, (2) the loan’s observable market price, or (3) the fair value of the collateral value, if the loan is collateral dependent. The allocated reserve is established as the difference between the carrying value of the loan and the collectable value. If there are significant changes in the amount or timing of the loan’s expected future cash flows, impairment is recalculated and the valuation allowance is adjusted accordingly.
When a residential or consumer loan is identified as a troubled debt restructuring,TDR, the loan is typically written down to its collateral value less selling costs.
At March 31, 2017,2018, our TDRs consisted of $24.6$11.9 million of commercial loans, $17.3$34.5 million of commercial real estate loans, $3.4$3.1 million of residential loans, and $4.0 million of consumer loans totaling $53.5 million. Approximately $36.9 million of the TDRs at March 31, 2018 were included with nonaccrual loans. At December 31, 2017, our TDRs consisted of $12.1 million of commercial loans, $34.7 million of commercial real estate loans, $3.3 million of residential loans, and $3.9 million of consumer loans totaling $49.2$54.0 million. Approximately $34.2$34.0 million of the TDRs at MarchDecember 31, 2017 were included with nonaccrual loans. At December 31, 2016, our TDRs consisted of $16.8 million of commercial loans, $18.3 million of commercial real estate loans, $3.0 million of residential loans, and $2.6 million of consumer loans totaling $40.7 million. Approximately $26.3 million of the TDRs at December 31, 2016 were included with nonaccrual loans.
Old National has allocated specific reserves to customers whose loan terms have been modified in TDRs totaling $5.0$5.9 million at March 31, 20172018 and $4.0$5.7 million of December 31, 2016.2017. At March 31, 2017,2018, Old National had committed to lend an additional $5.5$4.6 million to customers with outstanding loans that are classified as TDRs.
The terms of certain other loans were modified during 2017the three months ended March 31, 2018 that did not meet the definition of a TDR. It is our process to review all classified and criticized loans that, during the period, have been renewed, have entered into a forbearance agreement, have gone from principal and interest to interest only, or have extended the maturity date. In order to determine whether a borrower is experiencing financial difficulty, an evaluation is performed of the probability that the borrower will be in payment default on its debt in the foreseeable future without the modification. The evaluation is performed under our internal underwriting policy. We also evaluate whether a concession has been granted or if we were adequately compensated through a market interest rate, additional collateral, or a bona fide guarantee. We also consider whether the modification was insignificant relative to the other terms of the agreement or the delay in a payment.
Purchased credit impaired (“PCI”)
PCI loans are not considered impaired until after the point at which there has been a degradation of cash flows below our expected cash flows at acquisition. If a PCI loan is subsequently modified, and meets the definition of a TDR, it will be removed from PCI accounting and accounted for as a TDR only if the PCI loan was being accounted for individually. If the purchased credit impairedPCI loan is being accounted for as part of a pool, it will not be removed from the pool. At March 31, 2017,2018, it has not been necessary to remove any loans from PCI accounting.
In general, once a modified loan is considered a TDR, the loan will always be considered a TDR, and therefore impaired, until it is paid in full, otherwise settled, sold, or charged off. However, guidance also permits for loans to be removed from TDR status when subsequently restructured under these circumstances: (1) at the time of the subsequent restructuring, the borrower is not experiencing financial difficulties, and this is documented by a current credit evaluation at the time of the restructuring, (2) under the terms of the subsequent restructuring agreement, the institution has granted no concession to the borrower; and (3) the subsequent restructuring agreement includes market terms that are no less favorable than those that would be offered for a comparable new loan. For loans subsequently restructured that have cumulative principal forgiveness, the loan should continue to be measured in accordance with ASC310-10, “ReceivablesReceivables – Overall”Overall. However, consistent with ASC310-40-50-2, “TroubledTroubled Debt Restructurings by Creditors, Creditor Disclosure of Troubled Debt Restructurings”, the loan would not be required to be reported in the years following the restructuring if the subsequent restructuring meets both of these criteria: (1) has an interest rate at the time of the subsequent restructuring that is not less than a market interest rate; and (2) is performing in compliance with its modified terms after the subsequent restructuring.
Allowance for Loan Losses and Reserve for Unfunded Commitments
Loan charge-offs, net of recoveries, totaled $0.4 million for the three months ended March 31, 2018, compared to $0.3 million for the three months ended March 31, 2017, compared to $1.6 million for the three months ended March 31, 2016.2017. Annualized, net charge-offs (recoveries) to average loans wereremained the same at 0.01% for the three months ended March 31, 2017 compared to 0.09% for the three months ended March 31, 2016.2018 and 2017. Management will continue its efforts to reduce the level ofnon-performing loans and may consider the possibility of sales of troubled andnon-performing loans, which could result in additional charge-offs to the allowance for loan losses.
To provide for the risk of loss inherent in extending credit, we maintain an allowance for loan losses. The allowance for loan losses is maintained at a level believed adequate by management to absorb probable losses incurred in the consolidated loan portfolio. Management’s evaluation of the adequacy of the allowance is an estimate based on reviews of individual loans, pools of homogeneous loans, assessments of the impact of current and anticipated economic conditions on the portfolio, and historical loss experience.
At March 31, 2017,2018, the allowance for loan losses was $49.8$50.4 million, an decreaseincrease of $0.9$0.6 million compared to $50.7$49.8 million at March 31, 2016,2017, and no change compared tounchanged from December 31, 2016.2017. Continued loan growth in future periods, or a decline in our current level of recoveries, or an increase in charge-offs could result in an increase in provision expense.
As a percentage of total loans excluding loans held for sale, the allowance was 0.45% at March 31, 2018, compared to 0.55% at March 31, 2017 compared to 0.72% at March 31, 2016 and 0.55%0.45% at December 31, 2016. Our ratio of allowance for loan losses to total loans declined at March 31, 2017 compared to March 31, 2016 with the addition of Anchor’s $1.638 billion loan portfolio.2017.
In accordance with ASC 805, no allowance for loan losses is recorded at the date of acquisition and a reserve is only established to absorb any subsequent credit deterioration or adverse changes in expected cash flows.
The following table provides additional details of the components of the allowance for loan losses, including FAS 5/ASC 450, (AccountingContingencies, for Contingencies)loans collectively evaluated for impairment, ASC 310-10,Receivables, FAS 114/ASC310-35 (Accounting by Creditors for Impairment of a Loan)loans individually evaluated for impairment, and SOP03-3/ASC310-30 (Accounting for Certain ASC 310-30,Loans orand Debt Securities Acquired in a Transfer):with Deteriorated Credit Quality, for loans acquired with deteriorated credit quality:
(dollars in thousands) | FAS 5 | FAS 114 | SOP03-3 | Total | Collectively Evaluated for Impairment | Individually Evaluated for Impairment | Acquired with Deteriorated Credit Quality | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Loan balance | $ | 9,079,572 | $ | 92,135 | $ | 77,126 | $ | 9,248,833 | $ | 11,200,945 | $ | 98,050 | $ | 65,263 | $ | 11,364,258 | ||||||||||||||||
Remaining purchase discount | (81,814 | ) | (4,972 | ) | (30,274 | ) | (117,060 | ) | (98,295 | ) | (3,265 | ) | (24,016 | ) | (125,576 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Loans, net of discount | $ | 8,997,758 | $ | 87,163 | $ | 46,852 | $ | 9,131,773 | $ | 11,102,650 | $ | 94,785 | $ | 41,247 | $ | 11,238,682 | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Allowance, January 1, 2017 | $ | 41,532 | $ | 7,998 | $ | 278 | $ | 49,808 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Allowance, January 1, 2018 | $ | 40,137 | $ | 10,078 | $ | 166 | $ | 50,381 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Charge-offs | (2,178 | ) | (1,028 | ) | (33 | ) | (3,239 | ) | (2,431 | ) | (240 | ) | (14 | ) | (2,685 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Recoveries | 916 | 1,815 | 187 | 2,918 | 1,260 | 984 | 61 | 2,305 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Provision expense | 361 | (12 | ) | (2 | ) | 347 | 1,165 | (744 | ) | (41 | ) | 380 | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Allowance, March 31, 2017 | $ | 40,631 | $ | 8,773 | $ | 430 | $ | 49,834 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Allowance, March 31, 2018 | $ | 40,131 | $ | 10,078 | $ | 172 | $ | 50,381 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We maintain an allowance for losses on unfunded commercial lending commitments and letters of credit to provide for the risk of loss inherent in these arrangements. The allowance is computed using a methodology similar to that used to determine the allowance for loan losses, modified to take into account the probability of a drawdown on the commitment. The reserve for unfunded loan commitments is classified as a liability account on the balance sheet and totaled $3.0$3.4 million at March 31, 2017,2018, compared to $3.2$3.1 million at December 31, 2016.2017.
Market Risk
Market risk is the risk that the estimated fair value of our assets, liabilities, and derivative financial instruments will decline as a result of changes in interest rates or financial market volatility, or that our net income will be significantly reduced by interest rate changes.
The objective of our interest rate management process is to maximize net interest income while operating within acceptable limits established for interest rate risk and maintaining adequate levels of funding and liquidity.
Potential cash flows, sales, or replacement value of many of our assets and liabilities, especially those that earn or pay interest, are sensitive to changes in the general level of interest rates. This interest rate risk arises primarily from our normal business activities of gathering deposits and extending loans. Many factors affect our exposure to changes in interest rates, such as general economic and financial conditions, customer preferences, historical pricing relationships, andre-pricing characteristics of financial instruments. Our earnings can also be affected by the monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. Government and its agencies, particularly the Federal Reserve Board.Reserve.
In managing interest rate risk, we, through the Funds Management Committee, a committee of the Board of Directors, establish guidelines, for asset and liability management, including measurement of short and long-term sensitivities to changes in interest rates. Based on the results of our analysis, we may use different techniques to manage changing trends in interest rates including:
A key element in our ongoing process is to measure and monitor interest rate risk using a model to quantify the impact of changing interest rates on the Company.Old National. The model quantifies the effects of various possible interest rate scenarios on projected net interest income. The model measures the impact on net interest income relative to a base case scenario. The base case scenario assumes that the balance sheet and interest rates are held at current levels. The model shows our projected net interest income sensitivity based on interest rate changes only and does not consider other forecast assumptions.
The following table illustrates our projected net interest income sensitivity over a two year cumulative horizon based on the asset/liability model at March 31, 20172018 and 2016:2017:
Immediate | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rate Decrease | Immediate Rate Increase | Immediate Rate Decrease | Immediate Rate Increase | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
-50 | +100 | +200 | +300 | -50 | +100 | +200 | +300 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(dollars in thousands) | Basis Points | Base | Basis Points | Basis Points | Basis Points | Basis Points | Base | Basis Points | Basis Points | Basis Points | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
March 31, 2018 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Projected interest income: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Money market, other interest earning investments, and investment securities | $ | 228,367 | $ | 234,331 | $ | 247,550 | $ | 260,121 | $ | 272,410 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Loans | 901,486 | 958,043 | 1,069,783 | 1,180,736 | 1,291,192 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total interest income | 1,129,853 | 1,192,374 | 1,317,333 | 1,440,857 | 1,563,602 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Projected interest expense: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Deposits | 45,434 | 73,864 | 150,906 | 227,942 | 304,974 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Borrowings | 94,407 | 109,648 | 140,103 | 170,531 | 200,953 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total interest expense | 139,841 | 183,512 | 291,009 | 398,473 | 505,927 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net interest income | $ | 990,012 | $ | 1,008,862 | $ | 1,026,324 | $ | 1,042,384 | $ | 1,057,675 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Change from base | $ | (18,850 | ) | $ | 17,462 | $ | 33,522 | $ | 48,813 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
% change from base | -1.87 | % | 1.73 | % | 3.32 | % | 4.84 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
March 31, 2017 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Projected interest income: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Money market, other interest earning investments, and investment securities | $ | 226,433 | $ | 234,507 | $ | 247,095 | $ | 257,031 | $ | 267,559 | $ | 226,433 | $ | 234,507 | $ | 247,095 | $ | 257,031 | $ | 267,559 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Loans | 650,985 | 697,478 | 789,583 | 880,714 | 971,491 | �� | 650,985 | 697,478 | 789,583 | 880,714 | 971,491 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total interest income | 877,418 | 931,985 | 1,036,678 | 1,137,745 | 1,239,050 | 877,418 | 931,985 | 1,036,678 | 1,137,745 | 1,239,050 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Projected interest expense: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Deposits | 19,980 | 41,174 | 104,284 | 167,389 | 230,487 | 19,980 | 41,174 | 104,284 | 167,389 | 230,487 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Borrowings | 62,746 | 72,912 | 95,090 | 117,242 | 139,342 | 62,746 | 72,912 | 95,090 | 117,242 | 139,342 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total interest expense | 82,726 | 114,086 | 199,374 | 284,631 | 369,829 | 82,726 | 114,086 | 199,374 | 284,631 | 369,829 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net interest income | $ | 794,692 | $ | 817,899 | $ | 837,304 | $ | 853,114 | $ | 869,221 | $ | 794,692 | $ | 817,899 | $ | 837,304 | $ | 853,114 | $ | 869,221 | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Change from base | $ | (23,207 | ) | $ | 19,405 | $ | 35,215 | $ | 51,322 | $ | (23,207 | ) | $ | 19,405 | $ | 35,215 | $ | 51,322 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
% change from base | -2.84 | % | 2.37 | % | 4.31 | % | 6.27 | % | -2.84 | % | 2.37 | % | 4.31 | % | 6.27 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
March 31, 2016 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Projected interest income: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Money market, other interest earning investments, and investment securities | $ | 196,212 | $ | 208,192 | $ | 222,453 | $ | 235,244 | $ | 246,844 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Loans | 476,697 | 509,871 | 577,215 | 642,914 | 707,455 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total interest income | 672,909 | 718,063 | 799,668 | 878,158 | 954,299 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Projected interest expense: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Deposits | 15,642 | 26,937 | 73,952 | 120,967 | 167,983 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Borrowings | 48,115 | 55,219 | 72,957 | 90,696 | 108,434 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total interest expense | 63,757 | 82,156 | 146,909 | 211,663 | 276,417 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net interest income | $ | 609,152 | $ | 635,907 | $ | 652,759 | $ | 666,495 | $ | 677,882 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Change from base | $ | (26,755 | ) | $ | 16,852 | $ | 30,588 | $ | 41,975 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
% change from base | -4.21 | % | 2.65 | % | 4.81 | % | 6.60 | % |
Our asset sensitivity decreased slightly year over year primarily due to changes in our balance sheet mix, investment duration, and prepayment speed behavior.
A key element in the measurement and modeling of interest rate risk is there-pricing assumptions of our transaction deposit accounts, which have no contractual maturity dates. We assume this deposit base is comprised of both core and more volatile balances and consists of bothnon-interest bearing noninterest-bearing and interest bearinginterest-bearing accounts. Core deposit balances are assumed to be less interest rate sensitive and provide longer term funding. Volatile balances are assumed to be more interest rate sensitive and shorter in term. As part of our semi-static balance sheet modeling, we assume interest rates paid on the volatile deposits move in conjunction with changes in interest rates, in order to retain these deposits. This may include currentnon-interest bearing noninterest-bearing accounts.
Because the models are driven by expected behavior in various interest rate scenarios and many factors besides market interest rates affect our net interest income, we recognize that model outputs are not guarantees of actual results. For this reason, we model many different combinations of interest rates and balance sheet assumptions to understand our overall sensitivity to market interest rate changes, including shocks, yield curve flattening, yield curve steepening, as well as forecasts of likely interest rate scenarios. At MarchDecember 31, 2017, our projected net interest income sensitivity based on the asset/liability models we utilize was within the limits of the Company’sour interest rate risk policy for the scenarios tested.
We use derivative instruments, primarily interest rate swaps, to mitigate interest rate risk, including certain cash flow hedges on variable-rate debt with a notional amount of $775$625 million at March 31, 2017.2018. Our derivatives had an estimated fair value loss of $5.2$5.4 million at March 31, 2017,2018, compared to an estimated fair value loss of $5.9$2.2 million at December 31, 2016.2017. See Note 2021 to the consolidated financial statements for further discussion of derivative financial instruments.
Liquidity Risk
Liquidity risk arises from the possibility that we may not be able to satisfy current or future financial commitments, or may become unduly reliant on alternative funding sources. The Funds Management Committee of the Board of Directors establishes liquidity risk guidelines and, along with the Balance Sheet Management Committee, monitors liquidity risk. The objective of liquidity management is to ensure we have the ability to fund balance sheet growth and meet deposit and debt obligations in a timely and cost-effective manner. Management monitors liquidity through a regular review of asset and liability maturities, funding sources, and loan and deposit forecasts. We maintain strategic and contingency liquidity plans to ensure sufficient available funding to satisfy requirements for balance sheet growth, properly manage capital markets’ funding sources and to address unexpected liquidity requirements.
Loan repayments and maturing investment securities are a relatively predictable source of funds. However, deposit flows, calls of investment securities and prepayments of loans and mortgage-related securities are strongly influenced by interest rates, the housing market, general and local economic conditions, and competition in the marketplace. We continually monitor marketplace trends to identify patterns that might improve the predictability of the timing of deposit flows or asset prepayments.
A time deposit maturity schedule for Old National Bank is shown in the following table at March 31, 2017.2018.
(dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
Maturity Bucket | Amount | Rate | ||||||||||||||
2017 | $ | 696,691 | 0.61 | % | ||||||||||||
(dollars in thousands) Maturity Bucket | Amount | Rate | ||||||||||||||
2018 | 440,096 | 0.82 | $ | 963,001 | 1.11 | % | ||||||||||
2019 | 133,219 | 1.17 | 474,050 | 1.35 | ||||||||||||
2020 | 96,322 | 1.64 | 162,231 | 1.39 | ||||||||||||
2021 | 44,778 | 1.37 | 77,876 | 1.46 | ||||||||||||
2022 and beyond | 55,612 | 1.59 | ||||||||||||||
2022 | 46,149 | 1.42 | ||||||||||||||
2023 and beyond | 52,424 | 1.74 | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||
Total | $ | 1,466,718 | 0.85 | % | $ | 1,775,731 | 1.24 | % | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
Our ability to acquire funding at competitive prices is influenced by rating agencies’ views of our credit quality, liquidity, capital, and earnings. Moody’s Investor Service places us in an investment grade that indicates a low risk of default. For both Old National and Old National Bank:
The rating outlook from Moody’s Investor Service is stable.negative. Moody’s Investor Service concluded a rating review of Old National Bank on MayFebruary 2, 2016.2018.
The credit ratings of Old National and Old National Bank at March 31, 20172018 are shown in the following table.
Moody’s Investor Service | ||||||||
Long-term | Short-term | |||||||
Old National | A3 | N/A | ||||||
Old National Bank | Aa3 | P-1 | ||||||
N/A = not applicable
Old National Bank maintains relationships in capital markets with brokers and dealers to issue certificates of deposit and short-term and medium-term bank notes as well. At March 31, 2017,2018, Old National Bancorp and its subsidiaries had the following availability of liquid funds and borrowings:
Parent | ||||||||||||||||
(dollars in thousands) | Company | Subsidiaries | Parent Company | Subsidiaries | ||||||||||||
Available liquid funds: | ||||||||||||||||
Cash and due from banks | $ | 76,433 | $ | 140,602 | $ | 54,612 | $ | 223,629 | ||||||||
Unencumbered government-issued debt securities | — | 1,096,156 | — | 1,075,809 | ||||||||||||
Unencumbered investment grade municipal securities | — | 443,087 | — | 508,155 | ||||||||||||
Unencumbered corporate securities | — | 81,053 | — | 139,369 | ||||||||||||
Availability of borrowings: | ||||||||||||||||
Amount available from Federal Reserve discount window* | — | 502,049 | — | 519,013 | ||||||||||||
Amount available from Federal Home Loan Bank Indianapolis* | — | 542,869 | — | 590,385 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||
Total available funds | $ | 76,433 | $ | 2,805,816 | $ | 54,612 | $ | 3,056,360 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
* | Based on collateral pledged |
The Parent Company (Old National Bancorp) has routine funding requirements consisting primarily of operating expenses, dividends to shareholders, debt service, net derivative cash flows, and funds used for acquisitions. The Parent Company can obtain funding to meet its obligations from dividends and management fees collected from its subsidiaries, operating line of credit, and through the issuance of debt securities. Additionally, the Parent Company has a shelf registration in place with the Securities and Exchange CommissionSEC permitting ready access to the public debt and equity markets. At March 31, 2017,2018, the Parent Company’s other borrowings outstanding were $215.8$230.9 million.
Federal banking laws regulate the amount of dividends that may be paid by banking subsidiaries without prior approval. Prior regulatory approval is required if dividends to be declared in any year would exceed net earnings of the current year plus retained net profits for the preceding two years. Prior regulatory approval to pay dividends was not required in 20162017 and is not currently required.
Operational/Technology/Cyber Risk
Operational/technology/cyber risk is the potential that inadequate information systems, operational problems, breaches in internal controls, information security breaches, fraud, or unforeseen catastrophes will result in unexpected losses. We maintain frameworks, programs, and internal controls to prevent or minimize financial loss from failure of systems, people, or processes. This includes specific programs and frameworks intended to prevent or limit the effects of cyber risks including cyber-attacks or other information security breaches that might allow unauthorized transactions or unauthorized access to customer, associate, or company sensitive information. Metrics and measurements are used by Executive Leaders in the management of day-to-day operations to ensure effective customer service, minimization of service disruptions, and oversight of operational and cyber risk. We continually monitor and report on operational, technology, and cyber risks related to clients, products, and business practices; external and internal fraud; business disruptions and systems failures; cyber-attacks, information security or data breaches; damage to physical assets; and execution, delivery, and process management.
The Enterprise Risk Management Committee of the Board of Directors is responsible for the oversight, guidance, and monitoring of risks, including operational/technology/cyber risks, being taken by the Company. The monitoring is accomplished through on-going review of management reports, data on risks, policy limits and discussion on enterprise risk management strategies, policies, and risk assessments.
Regulatory/Compliance/Legal Risk
Regulatory/compliance/legal risk is the risk that the Company violated or was not in compliance with applicable laws, regulations or practices, industry standards, or ethical standards. The legal portion assesses the risk that unenforceable contracts, lawsuits, or adverse judgments can disrupt or otherwise negatively impact the Company. The Board of Directors expects we will perform business in a manner compliant with applicable laws and/or regulations and expects issues to be identified, analyzed, and remediated in a timely and complete manner.
OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS
Off-balance sheet arrangements include commitments to extend credit and financial guarantees. Commitments to extend credit and financial guarantees are used to meet the financial needs of our customers. Our banking affiliates have entered into various agreements to extend credit, including loan commitments of $2.417$3.181 billion and standby letters of credit of $54.0$71.9 million at March 31, 2017.2018. At March 31, 2017,2018, approximately $2.277$2.945 billion of the loan commitments had fixed rates and $140.2$236.0 million had floating rates, with the floating rates ranging from 0% to 21%25%. At December 31, 2016,2017, loan commitments were $2.354$3.144 billion and standby letters of credit were $51.7$68.7 million. The term of theseoff-balance sheet arrangements is typically one year or less.
Old National is a party in three separate risk participation transactions of interest rate swaps, which had total notional amount of $20.3$17.3 million at March 31, 2017.2018.
The following table presents our significant fixed and determinable contractual obligations at March 31, 2017:2018:
Payments Due In | Payments Due In | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(dollars in thousands) | One Year or Less (1) | One to Three Years | Three to Five Years | Over Five Years | Total | One Year or Less (1) | One to Three Years | Three to Five Years | Over Five Years | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Deposits without stated maturity | $ | 9,354,634 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 9,354,634 | $ | 11,012,869 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 11,012,869 | ||||||||||||||||||||
IRAs, consumer, and brokered certificates of deposit | 696,691 | 573,315 | 141,100 | 55,612 | 1,466,718 | 963,001 | 636,281 | 124,025 | 52,424 | 1,775,731 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Federal funds purchased and interbank borrowings | 61,016 | — | — | — | 61,016 | 150,026 | — | — | — | 150,026 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase | 320,550 | 25,000 | — | — | 345,550 | 308,189 | — | — | — | 308,189 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Federal Home Loan Bank advances | 753,818 | 402,404 | 50,000 | 234,808 | 1,441,030 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
FHLB advances | 902,032 | 301,902 | 58,500 | 401,745 | 1,664,179 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other borrowings | 117 | 164 | 190 | 218,550 | 219,021 | 96 | 284 | 332 | 248,186 | 248,898 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fixed interest payments (2) | 15,062 | 30,590 | 26,509 | 48,372 | 120,533 | 21,029 | 44,431 | 40,484 | 73,015 | 178,959 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Operating leases | 12,696 | 31,180 | 28,840 | 79,881 | 152,597 | 14,516 | 35,207 | 30,432 | 68,476 | 148,631 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other long-term liabilities (3) | 17,979 | 5,721 | 44 | 76 | 23,820 | 41,954 | 2,737 | 33 | 63 | 44,787 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
(1) | For the remaining nine months of fiscal |
(2) | Our senior notes, subordinated notes, certain trust preferred securities, and certain |
(3) | Includes |
We rent certain premises and equipment under operating leases. See Note 10 to the consolidated financial statements for additional information on long-term lease arrangements.
We are party to various derivative contracts as a means to manage the balance sheet and our related exposure to changes in interest rates, to manage our residential real estate loan origination and sale activity, and to provide derivative contracts to our clients. Since the derivative liabilities recorded on the balance sheet change frequently and do not represent the amounts that may ultimately be paid under these contracts, these liabilities are not included in the table of contractual obligations presented above. Further discussion of derivative instruments is included in Note 2021 to the consolidated financial statements.
In the normal course of business, various legal actions and proceedings are pending against us and our affiliates which are incidental to the business in which they are engaged. Further discussion of contingent liabilities is included in Note 2122 to the consolidated financial statements.
In addition, liabilities recorded under FASB ASC740-10 (FASB Interpretation No. 48,Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes – an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109) are not included in the table because the amount and timing of any cash payments cannot be reasonably estimated. Further discussion of income taxes and liabilities recorded under FASB ASC740-10 is included in Note 1920 to the consolidated financial statements.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES
Our accounting policies are described in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements included in our Annual Report on Form10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016.2017. Certain accounting policies require management to use significant judgment and estimates, which can have a material impact on the carrying value of certain assets and liabilities. We consider these policies to be critical accounting policies. The judgment and assumptions made are based upon historical experience or other factors that management believes to be reasonable under the circumstances. Because of the nature of the judgment and assumptions, actual results could differ from estimates, which could have a material effect on our financial condition and results of operations.
The following accounting policies materially affect our reported earnings and financial condition and require significant judgments and estimates. Management has reviewed these critical accounting estimates and related disclosures with our Audit Committee.
Goodwill and Intangibles
• | Description.For acquisitions, we are required to record the assets acquired, including identified intangible assets, and the liabilities assumed at their fair value. These often involve estimates based on third party valuations, such as appraisals, or internal valuations based on discounted cash flow analyses or other valuation techniques that may include estimates of attrition, inflation, asset growth rates, or other relevant factors. In addition, the determination of the useful lives over which an intangible asset will be amortized is subjective. Under FASB ASC 350, |
Acquired Impaired Loans
• | Description.Loans acquired with evidence of credit deterioration since inception and for which it is probable that all contractual payments will not be received are accounted for under ASC Topic310-30,Loans and Debt Securities Acquired with Deteriorated Credit Quality(“ASC310-30”). These loans are recorded at fair value at the time of acquisition, with no carryover of the related allowance for loan losses. Fair value of acquired loans is determined using a discounted cash flow methodology based on assumptions about the amount and timing of principal and interest payments, principal prepayments and principal defaults and losses, and current market rates. In recording the acquisition date fair values of acquired impaired loans, management calculates anon-accretable difference (the credit component of the purchased loans) and an accretable difference (the yield component of the purchased loans). |
Over the life of the acquired loans, we continue to estimate cash flows expected to be collected on pools of loans sharing common risk characteristics, which are treated in the aggregate when applying various valuation techniques. We evaluate at each balance sheet date whether the present value of our pools of loans determined using the effective interest rates has decreased significantly and if so, recognize a provision for loan loss in our consolidated statement of income. For any significant increases in cash flows expected to be collected, we adjust the amount of accretable yield recognized on a prospective basis over the pool’s remaining life.
Allowance for Loan Losses
The allowance is increased through a provision charged to operating expense. Uncollectible loans arecharged-off through the allowance. Recoveries of loans previouslycharged-off are added to the allowance. A loan is considered impaired when it is probable that contractual interest and principal payments will not be collected either for the amounts or by the dates as scheduled in the loan agreement. Our policy for recognizing income on impaired loans is to accrue interest unless a loan is placed on nonaccrual status. A loan is generally placed on nonaccrual status when principal or interest becomes 90 days past due unless it is well secured and in the process of collection, or earlier when concern exists as to the ultimate collectibility of principal or interest. We monitor the quality of our loan portfolio on anon-going basis and use a combination of detailed credit assessments by relationship managers and credit officers, historic loss trends, and economic and business environment factors in determining the allowance for loan losses. We record provisions for loan losses based on current loans outstanding, grade changes, mix of loans, and expected losses. A detailed loan loss evaluation on an individual loan basis for our highest risk loans is performed quarterly. Management follows the progress of the economy and how it might affect our borrowers in both the near and the intermediate term. We have a formalized and disciplined independent loan review program to evaluate loan administration, credit quality, and compliance with corporate loan standards. This program includes periodic, regular reviews of problem loan reports, delinquencies and charge-offs.
We use historic loss ratios adjusted for economic conditions to determine the appropriate level of allowance for residential real estate and consumer loans.
Management’s analysis of probable losses in the portfolio at March 31, 20172018 resulted in a range for allowance for loan losses of $15.1$15.2 million. The range pertains to general (FASB ASC 450, Contingencies/SFAS 5)Contingencies) reserves for both retail and performing commercial loans. Specific (FASB ASC 310, Receivables/SFAS 114)Receivables) reserves do not have a range of probable loss. Due to the risks and uncertainty associated with the economy and our projection of FAS 5 loss rates inherent in the portfolio, we establish a range of probable outcomes (ahigh-end estimate and alow-end estimate) and evaluate our position within this range. The potential effect to net income based on our position in the range relative to the high and low endpoints is a decrease of $1.5$1.7 million and an increase of $8.3$9.8 million, respectively, after taking into account the tax effects. These sensitivities are hypothetical and may not represent actual results.
Derivative Financial Instruments
• | Description.As part of our overall interest rate risk management, we use derivative instruments to reduce exposure to changes in interest rates and market prices for financial instruments. The application of the hedge accounting policy requires judgment in the assessment of hedge effectiveness, identification of similar hedged item groupings and measurement of changes in the fair value of derivative financial instruments and hedged items. To the extent hedging relationships are found to be effective, as determined by FASB ASC 815, |
Income Taxes
Management has discussed the development and selection of these critical accounting estimates with the Audit Committee and the Audit Committee has reviewed our disclosure relating to it in this “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations”.Operations.”
In this report, we have made various statements regarding current expectations or forecasts of future events, which speak only as of the date the statements are made. These statements are “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward-looking statements are also made fromtime-to-time in press releases and in oral statements made by the officers of Old National Bancorp (“Old National,”National” or the “Company”). Forward-looking statements can be identified by the use of the words “expect,” “may,” “could,” “intend,” “project,” “estimate,” “believe,” “anticipate,” and other words of similar meaning. Forward-looking statements also include, but are not limited to, statements regarding estimated cost savings, plans and objectives for future operations, the Company’s business and growth strategies, including future acquisitions of banks, regulatory developments, and expectations about performance as well as economic and market conditions and trends.
Such forward-looking statements are based on assumptions and estimates, which although believed to be reasonable, may turn out to be incorrect. Therefore, undue reliance should not be placed upon these estimates and statements. We cannot assure that any of these statements, estimates, or beliefs will be realized and actual results may differ from those contemplated in these “forward-looking statements.” We undertake no obligation to publicly update any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events, or otherwise. You are advised to consult further disclosures we may make on related subjects in our filings with the SEC. In addition to other factors discussed in this report, some of the important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those discussed in the forward-looking statements include the following:
Investors should consider these risks, uncertainties, and other factors in addition to risk factors included in our other filings with the SEC.
ITEM 3. QUANTITIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
See Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Market Risk and Liquidity Risk.
ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Conclusion Regarding the Effectiveness of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures. Old National’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer have concluded that Old National’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rule13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended), based on their evaluation of these controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report on Form10-Q, are effective at the reasonable assurance level as discussed below to ensure that information required to be disclosed by Old National in the reports it files under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported
within the time periods specified in the rules and forms of the Securities and Exchange Commission and that such information is accumulated and communicated to Old National’s management, including its principal executive officer and principal financial officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
Limitations on the Effectiveness of Controls. Management, including the principal executive officer and principal financial officer, does not expect that Old National’s disclosure controls and internal controls will prevent all error and all fraud. A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within the Company have been detected. These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty, and that breakdowns can occur because of a simple error or mistake. Additionally, controls can be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people or by management override of the controls.
The design of any system of controls also is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be only reasonable assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions. Over time, control may become inadequate because of changes in conditions or the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. Because of the inherent limitations in a cost-effective control system, misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting. There were no changes in Old National’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by this report that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, Old National’s internal control over financial reporting.
PART II
OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1A. | RISK FACTORS |
There have been no material changes from the risk factors previously disclosed in the “Risk Factors” section of the Company’s Annual Report on Form10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016.2017.
ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS
ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES |
(c) ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
Total Number | ||||||||||||||||
of Shares | ||||||||||||||||
Total | Average | Purchased as | Maximum Number of | |||||||||||||
Number | Price | Part of Publicly | Shares that May Yet | |||||||||||||
of Shares | Paid Per | Announced Plans | Be Purchased Under | |||||||||||||
Period | Purchased | Share | or Programs | the Plans or Programs | ||||||||||||
01/01/17 - 01/31/17 | 2,004 | $ | 17.86 | — | — | |||||||||||
02/01/17 - 02/28/17 | 51,772 | 18.20 | — | — | ||||||||||||
03/01/17 - 03/31/17 | 5,375 | 17.35 | — | — | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||
Quarter-to-date 3/31/17 | 59,151 | $ | 18.11 | — | — | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period | Total Number of Shares Purchased | Average Price Paid Per Share | Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs | Maximum Number of Shares that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs | ||||||||||||
01/01/18 - 01/31/18 | 714 | $ | 17.45 | — | — | |||||||||||
02/01/18 - 02/28/18 | 57,025 | 17.47 | — | — | ||||||||||||
03/01/18 - 03/31/18 | 6,285 | 16.96 | — | — | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||
Quarter-to-date 3/31/18 | 64,024 | $ | 17.42 | — | — | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Board of Directors did not authorize a stock repurchase plan for 2017.2018. During the three months ended March 31, 2017,2018, Old National repurchased a limited number of shares associated with employee share-based incentive programs.
(a) | None |
(b) | There have been no material changes in the procedure by which security holders recommend nominees to the Company’s board of directors. |
31.1 | Certification of Principal Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | |
31.2 | Certification of Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | |
32.1 | Certification of Principal Executive Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | |
32.2 | Certification of Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | |
101 | The following materials from Old National’s Form10-Q Report for the quarterly period ended March 31, |
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
OLD NATIONAL BANCORP (Registrant) | ||
By: | /s/ James C. Ryan, III | |
James C. Ryan, III Senior Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer Duly Authorized Officer and Principal Financial Officer | ||
Date: May |
8391