UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM10-Q

QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF

THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the Quarterly Period Ended June 30, 20172018

Commission File Number001-33653

 

 

LOGO

(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)

 

Ohio 31-0854434

(State or other jurisdiction

of incorporation or organization)

 

(I.R.S. Employer

Identification Number)

Fifth Third Center

Cincinnati, Ohio 45263

(Address of principal executive offices)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code:(800) 972-3030

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  ☒    No  ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of RegulationS-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).    Yes  ☒    No  ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, anon-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company or an emerging growth company. See definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company” and “emerging growth company” in Rule12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

 

Large accelerated filer     ☒  Accelerated filer 
Non-accelerated filer     ☐   (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)  Smaller reporting company 
   

Emerging growth company

 

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrantRegistrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act.   ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes  ☐    No  ☒

There were 736,725,835668,092,149 shares of the Registrant’s common stock, without par value, outstanding as of July 31, 2017.2018.


LOGOLOGO

FINANCIAL CONTENTS

 

Part I. Financial Information

  

Glossary of Abbreviations and Acronyms

   2 

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (Item 2)

  

Selected Financial Data

   3 

Overview

   4 

Non-GAAP Financial Measures

   67 

Recent Accounting Standards

   89 

Critical Accounting Policies

   89 

Statements of Income Analysis

   910 

Balance Sheet Analysis

   1718 

Business Segment Review

   2223 

Risk Management—Overview

   2830 

Credit Risk Management

   2931 

Market Risk Management

   4244 

Liquidity Risk Management

   4648 

Operational Risk Management

   4851 

Compliance Risk Management

   4851 

Capital Management

   4952 

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

   5154 

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk (Item 3)

   5255 

Controls and Procedures (Item 4)

   5255 

Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes (Item 1)

  

Balance Sheets (unaudited)

   5356 

Statements of Income (unaudited)

   5457 

Statements of Comprehensive Income (unaudited)

   5558 

Statements of Changes in Equity (unaudited)

   5659 

Statements of Cash Flows (unaudited)

   5760 

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)

   5861 

Part II. Other Information

  

Legal Proceedings (Item 1)

   111117 

Risk Factors (Item 1A)

   111117 

Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds (Item 2)

   111118 

Exhibits (Item 6)

   111118 

Signatures

   112120 

Certifications

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This report contains statements that we believe are “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Rule 175 promulgated thereunder, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and Rule3b-6 promulgated thereunder. These statements relate to our financial condition, results of operations, plans, objectives, future performance or business. They usually can be identified by the use of forward-looking language such as “will likely result,” “may,” “are expected to,” “is anticipated,” “potential,” “estimate,” “forecast,” “projected,” “intends to,” or may include other similar words or phrases such as “believes,” “plans,” “trend,” “objective,” “continue,” “remain,” or similar expressions, or future or conditional verbs such as “will,” “would,” “should,” “could,” “might,” “can,” or similar verbs. You should not place undue reliance on these statements, as they are subject to risks and uncertainties, including but not limited to the risk factors set forth in the Risk Factors section in Item 1A in our most recent Annual Report on Form10-K.10-K as updated by our Quarterly Reports on Form10-Q . When considering these forward-looking statements, you should keep in mind these risks and uncertainties, as well as any cautionary statements we may make. Moreover, you should treat these statements as speaking only as of the date they are made and based only on information then actually known to us. There are a number of important factors that could cause future results to differ materially from historical performance and these forward-looking statements. Factors that might cause such a difference include, but are not limited to: (1) general economic or real estate market conditions, either nationally or in the states in which Fifth Third, one or more acquired entities and/or the combined company do business, weaken or are less favorable than expected; (2) deteriorating credit quality; (2) loan concentration by location or industry of borrowers or collateral; (3) political developments, wars orproblems encountered by other hostilities may disrupt or increase volatility in securities markets or other economic conditions;financial institutions; (4) changes in the interest rate environment reduce interest margins; (5) prepayment speeds, loan origination and sale volumes, charge-offs and loan loss provisions; (6) Fifth Third’s ability to maintain required capital levels and adequateinadequate sources of funding andor liquidity; (7) maintaining capital requirements and adequate sources(5) unfavorable actions of funding and liquidity may limit Fifth Third’s operations and potential growth; (8) changes and trends in capital markets; (9) problems encountered by larger or similar financial institutions may adversely affect the banking industry and/or Fifth Third; (10) competitive pressures among depository institutions increase significantly; (11) changes in customer preferences or information technology systems; (12) effects of critical accounting policies and judgments; (13) changes in accounting policies or procedures as may be required by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) or other regulatoryrating agencies; (14) legislative or regulatory changes or actions, or significant litigation, adversely affect Fifth Third, one or more acquired entities and/or the combined company or the businesses in which Fifth Third, one or more acquired entities and/or the combined company are engaged, including the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act; (15) ability(6) inability to maintain favorable ratings from rating agencies; (16) failure of models or risk management systems or controls; (17) fluctuation of Fifth Third’s stock price; (18) ability to attract and retain key personnel; (19)grow deposits; (7) limitations on the ability to receive dividends from its subsidiaries; (20) potentially dilutive effect of future acquisitions on current shareholders’ ownership of Fifth Third; (21) declines in the value of(8) cyber-security risks; (9) Fifth Third’s goodwill or other intangible assets; (22) effects of accounting or financial results of one or more acquired entities; (23) difficulties from Fifth Third’s investment in, relationship with, and nature of the operations of Vantiv Holding, LLC; (24) loss of income from any sale or potential sale of businesses; (25) difficulties in separating the operations of any branches or other assets divested; (26) losses or adverse impacts on the carrying values of branches and long-lived assets in connection with their sales or anticipated sales; (27) inability to achieve expected benefits from branch consolidations and planned sales within desired timeframes, if at all; (28) ability to secure confidential information and deliver products and services through the use of computer systems and telecommunications networks; (29) the negotiation and (if any) implementation(10) failures by Vantiv, Inc.third-party service providers; (11) inability to manage strategic initiatives and/or Worldpay Group plcorganizational changes; (12) inability to implement technology system enhancements; (13) failure of internal controls and other risk management systems; (14) losses related to fraud, theft or violence; (15) inability to attract and retain skilled personnel; (16) adverse impacts of government regulation; (17) governmental or regulatory changes or other actions; (18) failures to meet applicable capital requirements; (19) regulatory objections to Fifth Third’s capital plan; (20) regulation of Fifth Third’s derivatives activities; (21) regulatory objections to Fifth Third’s resolution plan; (22) deposit insurance premiums; (23) assessments for the orderly liquidation fund; (24) changes in LIBOR; (25) weakness in the national or local economies; (26) global political and economic uncertainty or negative actions; (27) changes in interest rates; (28) changes and trends in capital markets; (29) fluctuation of Fifth Third’s stock price; (30) volatility in mortgage banking revenue; (31) litigation, investigations, and enforcement proceedings by governmental authorities; (32) breaches of contractual covenants, representations and warranties; (33) competition and changes in the financial services industry; (34) changing retail distribution strategies, customer preferences and behavior; (35) risks relating to the potential merger with MB Financial, Inc. and Fifth Third’s ability to realize the anticipated benefits of the merger; (36) difficulties in identifying, acquiring or integrating suitable strategic partnerships, investments or acquisitions; (37) potential acquisitiondilution from future acquisitions; (38) loss of income and/or difficulties encountered in the sale and separation of businesses, investments or other assets; (39) results of Vantiv Holding, LLC, a subsidiary of Worldpay, Group plc byInc. or other investments or acquired entities; (40) difficulties from or changes in Fifth Third’s investment in, relationship with, and nature of the operations of Vantiv Holding, LLC, a subsidiary of Worldpay, Inc.; (41) changes in accounting standards or interpretation or declines in the value of Fifth Third’s goodwill or other intangible assets; (42) inaccuracies or other failures from the use of models; (43) effects of critical accounting policies and suchjudgments or the use of inaccurate estimates; (44) weather related events or other actions as Vantiv, Inc.natural disasters; and Worldpay Group plc may take in furtherance thereof; and (30)(45) the impact of reputational risk created by these or other developments on such matters as business generation and retention, funding and liquidity.

Glossary of Abbreviations and Acronyms

 

Fifth Third Bancorp provides the following list of abbreviations and acronyms as a tool for the reader that are used in Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements and the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

 

 

ALCO:Asset Liability Management Committee

ALLL:Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses

AOCI: Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)

APR:Annual Percentage Rate

ARM: Adjustable Rate Mortgage

ASF: Available Stable Funding

ASU: Accounting Standards Update

ATM:Automated Teller Machine

BCBS: Basel Committee on Banking Supervision

BHC: Bank Holding Company

BOLI: Bank Owned Life Insurance

BPO:Broker Price Opinion

bps: Basis Points

CCAR: Comprehensive Capital Analysis and Review

CDC: Fifth Third Community Development Corporation

CET1: Common Equity Tier 1

CFPB:Consumer Financial Protection Bureau

C&I:Commercial and Industrial

DCF: Discounted Cash Flow

DFA:Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform & Consumer Protection Act

DTCC: Depository Trust & Clearing Corporation

ERM:Enterprise Risk Management

ERMC:Enterprise Risk Management Committee

EVE:Economic Value of Equity

FASB:Financial Accounting Standards Board

FDIC:Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation

FHA:Federal Housing Administration

FHLB:Federal Home Loan Bank

FHLMC:Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation

FICO: Fair Isaac Corporation (credit rating)

FINRA:Financial Industry Regulatory Authority

FNMA:Federal National Mortgage Association

FOMC:Federal Open Market Committee

FRB:Federal Reserve Bank

FTE:Fully Taxable Equivalent

FTP:Funds Transfer Pricing

FTS:Fifth Third Securities

GDP: Gross Domestic Product

GNMA:Government National Mortgage Association

GSE:United StatesGovernment Sponsored Enterprise

HQLA:High Quality Liquid Assets

IPO:Initial Public Offering

IRC:Internal Revenue Code

IRLC:Interest Rate Lock Commitment

ISDA: International Swaps and Derivatives Association, Inc.

LCR: Liquidity Coverage Ratio

LIBOR:London Interbank Offered Rate

LLC:Limited Liability Company

LTV:Loan-to-Value

MD&A:Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

MSA:Metropolitan Statistical Area

MSR:Mortgage Servicing Right

N/A: Not Applicable

NII:Net Interest Income

NM:Not Meaningful

NSFR: Net Stable Funding Ratio

OAS:Option-Adjusted Spread

OCI:Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)

OREO:Other Real Estate Owned

OTTI:Other-Than-Temporary Impairment

PCA: Prompt Corrective Action

RCC:Risk Compliance Committee

RSF: Required Stable Funding

SARs:SAR: Stock Appreciation RightsRight

SBA: Small Business Administration

SCB:Stress Capital Buffer

SEC:United States Securities and Exchange Commission

SLB: Stress Leverage Buffer

TBA:To Be Announced

TCJA:Tax Cuts and Jobs Act

TDR:Troubled Debt Restructuring

TILA: Truth in Lending Act

TRATRA:: Tax Receivable Agreement

U.S.: United States of America

U.S. GAAP:United States Generally Accepted Accounting Principles

VA:United StatesDepartment of Veteran Affairs

VIE:Variable Interest Entity

VRDN:Variable Rate Demand Note

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (Item 2)

 

The following is Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations of certain significant factors that have affected Fifth Third Bancorp’s (the “Bancorp” or “Fifth Third”) financial condition and results of operations during the periods included in the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, which are a part of this filing. Reference to the Bancorp incorporates the parent holding company and all consolidated subsidiaries. The Bancorp’s banking subsidiary is referred to as the Bank.

TABLE 1: Selected Financial Data

 

 
   

For the three months

ended June 30,

 %      

For the six months
ended June 30,

 %    For the three months
ended June 30,
   %   For the six months
ended June 30,
   % 
($ in millions, except for per share data)       2017              2016(h) Change          2017              2016(h) Change        2018             2017   Change       2018             2017   Change 

 

 

Income Statement Data

                               

Net interest income (U.S. GAAP)

 $  939          902    $  1,872          1,805   

$

   1,020          939      

$

   2,016          1,872     

Net interest income (FTE)(a)(b)

   945          908      1,884          1,817      1,024          945         2,023          1,884     

Noninterest income

   564          599 (6)     1,087          1,235 (12)     743          564    32      1,652          1,087    52  

Total revenue(a)

   1,509          1,507       2,971          3,052 (3)     1,767          1,509    17      3,675          2,971    24  

Provision for loan and lease losses

   52          91 (43)     126          210 (40)     33          52    (37)     56          126    (56) 

Noninterest expense

   957          983 (3)     1,943          1,968 (1)     1,037          957         2,083          1,943     

Net income attributable to Bancorp

   367          328 12      672          654      586          367    60      1,290          672    92  

Net income available to common shareholders

   344          305 13      634          616      563          344    64      1,252          634    97  

 

 

Common Share Data

                               

Earnings per share - basic

 $  0.46          0.40 15    $  0.84          0.80   

$

   0.81          0.46    76   

$

   1.80          0.84    115  

Earnings per share - diluted

   0.45          0.39 15      0.83          0.79      0.80          0.45    78      1.77          0.83    113  

Cash dividends declared per common share

   0.14          0.13      0.28          0.26      0.18          0.14    29      0.34          0.28    21  

Book value per share

   20.42          20.09      20.42          20.09      21.97          20.42         21.97          20.42     

Market value per share

   25.96          17.59 48      25.96          17.59 48      28.70          25.96    11      28.70          25.96    11  

 

 

Financial Ratios

                               

Return on average assets

   1.05  %    0.92 14      0.97  %    0.92      1.66  %    1.05    58      1.84  %    0.97    90  

Return on average common equity

   9.0          8.0 13      8.4          8.2      15.3          9.0    70      17.0          8.4    102  

Return on average tangible common equity(b)

   10.7          9.6 11      10.0          9.8      18.4          10.7    72      20.4          10.0    104  

Dividend payout ratio

   30.4          32.5 (6)     33.3          32.5      22.2          30.4    (27)     18.9          33.3    (43) 

Average total Bancorp shareholders’ equity as a percent of average assets

   11.84          11.60      11.78          11.59      11.38          11.84    (4)     11.45          11.78    (3) 

Tangible common equity as a percent of tangible assets(b)(h)

   9.02          8.64      9.02          8.64      9.33          9.02         9.33          9.02     

Net interest margin(a)(b)

   3.01          2.88      3.01          2.89      3.21          3.01         3.19          3.01     

Net interest rate spread(a)(b)

    2.86          2.75         2.86          2.77     

Efficiency(a)(b)

   63.4          65.3 (3)     65.4          64.5      58.7          63.4    (7)     56.7          65.4    (13) 

 

 

Credit Quality

                               

Net lossescharged-off

 $  64          87 (26)   $  153          183 (16)  

$

   94          64    47   

$

   175          153    14  

Net lossescharged-off as a percent of average portfolio loans and leases

   0.28  %    0.37 (24)     0.34  %    0.39 (13)     0.41  %    0.28    46      0.38  %    0.34    12  

ALLL as a percent of portfolio loans and leases

   1.34          1.38 (3)     1.34          1.38 (3)     1.17          1.34    (13)     1.17          1.34    (13) 

Allowance for credit losses as a percent of portfolio loans and leases(c)

   1.52          1.54 (1)     1.52          1.54 (1)     1.31          1.52    (14)     1.31          1.52    (14) 

Nonperforming portfolio assets as a percent of portfolio loans and leases and OREO

   0.72          0.86 (16)     0.72          0.86 (16)     0.52          0.72    (28)     0.52          0.72    (28) 

 

 

Average Balances

                               

Loans and leases, including held for sale

 $  92,653          94,807 (2)   $  92,721          94,443 (2)  

$

   93,232          92,653      

$

   93,051          92,721     

Total securities and other short-term investments

   33,481          32,040      33,329          31,808      34,935          33,481         34,806          33,329     

Total assets

   140,344          142,920 (2)     140,243          142,251 (1)     141,529          140,344         141,547          140,243     

Transaction deposits(d)

   95,825          94,929      96,419          94,806      97,574          95,825         97,298          96,419     

Core deposits(e)

   99,570          98,973      100,205          98,845      101,592          99,570         101,235          100,205     

Wholesale funding(f)

   20,665          23,084 (10)     19,900          22,509 (12)     20,464          20,665    (1)     20,511          19,900     

Bancorp shareholders’ equity

   16,615          16,584       16,522          16,479       16,108          16,615    (3)     16,209          16,522    (2) 

 

 

Regulatory Capital and Liquidity Ratios

                               

CET1 capital(g)

   10.63  %    9.94      10.63  %    9.94 ��     10.91  %    10.63         10.91  %    10.63     

Tier I risk-based capital(g)

   11.76          11.03      11.76          11.03      12.02          11.76         12.02          11.76     

Total risk-based capital(g)

   15.22          14.66      15.22          14.66      15.21          15.22         15.21          15.22     

Tier I leverage

   10.07          9.64      10.07          9.64      10.24          10.07         10.24          10.07     

CET1 capital (fullyphased-in)(b)(g)

   10.52          9.86      10.52          9.86  

Modified LCR

   115          110      115          110      116          115         116          115     

 

 
(a)

Amounts presented on an FTE basis. The FTE adjustment for both the three months endedJune 30, 20172018 and 20162017 was$64,and $6, respectively, and for both the six months

endedJune 30, 20172018and 20162017 was$127. and $12, respectively.

(b)

These arenon-GAAP measures. For further information, refer to theNon-GAAP Financial Measures section of MD&A.

(c)

The allowance for credit losses is the sum of the ALLL and the reserve for unfunded commitments.

(d)

Includes demand deposits, interest checking deposits, savings deposits, money market deposits and foreign office deposits.

(e)

Includes transaction deposits and other time deposits.

(f)

Includes certificates $100,000 and over, other deposits, federal funds purchased, other short-term borrowings and long-term debt.

(g)

Under the U.S. banking agencies’ Basel III Final Rule, assets and credit equivalent amounts ofoff-balance sheet exposures are calculated according to the standardized approach for risk-weighted assets. The resulting values are added together in the Bancorp’s total risk-weighted assets.

(h)

Net tax deficiencies of $5Excludes unrealized gains and $6 were reclassified from capital surplus to applicable income tax expense and average common shares outstanding – diluted were adjusted for the three and six months ended June 30, 2016, respectively, related to the early adoption of ASU2016-09 during the fourth quarter of 2016, with an effective date of January 1, 2016.losses.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (continued)

 

 

OVERVIEW

Fifth Third Bancorp is a diversified financial services company headquartered in Cincinnati, Ohio. At June 30, 2017,2018, the Bancorp had $141.1$140.7 billion in assets and operated 1,1571,158 full-service banking centers including 91 Bank Mart® locations open seven days a week, inside select grocery stores, and 2,4612,458 Fifth Third branded ATMs in ten states throughout the Midwestern and Southeastern regions of the U.S. The Bancorp reports on four business segments: Commercial Banking, Branch Banking, Consumer Lending and Wealth and Asset Management. The Bancorp also has an approximate 18%3.3% interest in Vantiv Holding, LLC. The carrying value of the Bancorp’s investment in Vantiv Holding, LLC was $438$426 million at June 30, 2017.2018.

This overview of MD&A highlights selected information in the financial results of the Bancorp and may not contain all of the information that is important to you. For a more complete understanding of trends, events, commitments, uncertainties, liquidity, capital resources and critical accounting policies and estimates, you should carefully read this entire document as well as the Bancorp’s Annual Report on Form10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016.2017. Each of these items could have an impact on the Bancorp’s financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. In addition, refer to the Glossary of Abbreviations and Acronyms in this report for a list of terms included as a tool for the reader of this quarterly report on Form10-Q. The abbreviations and acronyms identified therein are used throughout this MD&A, as well as the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

Net interest income, net interest margin, net interest rate spread and the efficiency ratio are presented in MD&A on an FTE basis. The FTE basis adjusts for thetax-favored status of income from certain loans and securities held by the Bancorp that are not taxable for federal income tax purposes. The Bancorp believes this presentation to be the preferred industry measurement of net interest income as it provides a relevant comparison between taxable andnon-taxable amounts. The FTE basis for presenting net interest income is anon-GAAP measure. For further information, refer to theNon-GAAP Financial Measures section of MD&A.

The Bancorp’s revenues are dependent on both net interest income and noninterest income. For both the three and six months ended June 30, 2017,2018, net interest income on an FTE basis and noninterest income provided 63%58% and 37%42% of total revenue, respectively. For the six months ended June 30, 2018, net interest income on an FTE basis and noninterest income provided 55% and 45% of total revenue, respectively. The Bancorp derives the majority of its revenues within the U.S. from customers domiciled in the U.S. Revenue from foreign countries and external customers domiciled in foreign countries was immaterial to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for both the three and six months ended June 30, 2017.2018. Changes in interest rates, credit quality, economic trends and the capital markets are primary factors that drive the performance of the Bancorp. As discussed later in the Risk Management section of MD&A, risk identification, measurement, monitoring, control and reporting are important to the management of risk and to the financial performance and capital strength of the Bancorp.

Net interest income is the difference between interest income earned on assets such as loans, leases and securities, and interest expense incurred on liabilities such as deposits, other short-term borrowings and long-term debt. Net interest income is affected by the general level of interest rates, the relative level of short-term and long-term interest rates, changes in interest rates and changes in the amount and composition of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities. Generally, the rates of interest the Bancorp earns on its assets and pays on its liabilities are established for a period of time. The change in market interest rates over time exposes the Bancorp to interest rate risk through potential adverse changes to net interest income and financial position. The Bancorp manages this risk by continually analyzing and adjusting the composition of its assets and liabilities based on their payment streams and interest rates, the timing of their maturities and their sensitivity to changes in market interest rates. Additionally, in the ordinary course of business, the Bancorp enters into certain derivative transactions as part of its overall strategy to manage its interest rate and prepayment risks. The Bancorp is also exposed to the risk of loss on its loan and lease portfolio, as a result of changing expected cash flows caused by borrower credit events, such as loan defaults and inadequate collateral.

Noninterest income is derived from service charges on deposits, wealth and asset management revenue, corporate banking revenue, card and processing revenue, mortgage banking net revenue, net securities gains or losses and other noninterest income. Noninterest expense includes personnel costs, net occupancy expense, technology and communication costs, equipment expense, card and processing expense, equipment expense and other noninterest expense.

Vantiv, Inc. and Vantiv Holding, LLC Transactions

On January 16, 2018, Vantiv, Inc. completed its previously announced acquisition of Worldpay Group plc. with the resulting combined company named Worldpay, Inc. As a result of this transaction, the Bancorp recognized a gain of $414 million in other noninterest income during the first quarter of 2018 associated with the dilution in its ownership interest in Vantiv Holding, LLC from approximately 8.6% to approximately 4.9%.

On June 27, 2018, the Bancorp completed the sale of 5 million shares of Class A common stock of Worldpay, Inc., formerly Vantiv, Inc. The Bancorp had previously received these Class A shares in exchange for Class B Units of Vantiv Holding, LLC. The Bancorp recognized a gain of $205 million related to the sale. As a result of the sale, the Bancorp beneficially owns approximately 3.3% of Worldpay’s equity through its ownership of approximately 10.3 million Class B Units. The Bancorp’s remaining interest in Vantiv Holding, LLC of $426 million continues to be accounted for as an equity method investment given the nature of Vantiv Holding, LLC’s structure as a limited liability company and contractual arrangements between Vantiv Holding, LLC and the Bancorp.

GS Holdings Transactions

In May 2018, GreenSky, Inc. launched an IPO and issued 38 million shares of Class A common stock for a valuation of $23 per share. In connection with this IPO, the Bancorp’s investment in GreenSky, LLC, which was comprised of 252,550 membership units, was converted to 2,525,498 units of the newly formed GreenSky Holdings, LLC (“GS Holdings”), representing a 1.4% interest in GS Holdings. The Bancorp’s units in GS Holdings are exchangeable on aone-to-one basis for Class A common stock or cash after the initial180-daylock-up period expires.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (continued)

At the time of the IPO, the Bancorp recognized a $16 million gain on its investment in GreenSky, LLC, which was included in other noninterest income in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income for the three and six months ended June 30, 2018. At June 30, 2018, the investment in GS Holdings was $53 million, which was included in equity securities in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets.

Accelerated Share Repurchase Transactions

During the six months ended June 30, 2017,2018, the Bancorp entered into or settled accelerated share repurchase transactions. As part of these transactions, the Bancorp entered into forward contracts in which the final number of shares delivered at settlement was based generally on a discount to the average daily volume weighted-average price of the Bancorp’s common stock during the term of the repurchase agreements. For more information on the accelerated share repurchase program, refer to Note 1514 of the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements. For a summary of the Bancorp’s accelerated share repurchase transactions that were entered into or settled during the six months ended June 30, 2017,2018, refer to Table 2.

TABLE 2: Summary of Accelerated Share Repurchase Transactions

 

 
Repurchase Date   

Amount

($ in millions)

  Shares Repurchased on   
Repurchase Date   
   Shares Received from Forward
Contract Settlement
   Total Shares
Repurchased
   Settlement Date    

 

 

December 20, 2016

 $ 155   4,843,750    1,044,362    5,888,112    February 6, 2017 

May 1, 2017

  342   11,641,971    2,248,250    13,890,221    July 31, 2017 

 

 
Repurchase Date    

Amount

($ in millions)    

  Shares Repurchased on   
Repurchase Date   
   Shares Received from  
Forward Contract  
Settlement  
   Total Shares   
Repurchased   
     Settlement Date         

December 19, 2017

 $ 273   7,727,273      824,367      8,551,640      March 19, 2018 

February 12, 2018

  318   8,691,318      1,015,731      9,707,049      March 26, 2018 

May 25, 2018

   235   6,402,244      1,172,122      7,574,366      June 15, 2018 

Senior Notes Offering

On June 15, 2017,March 14, 2018, the Bancorp issued and sold $700$650 million of 2.60%3.95% senior fixed-rate notes, with a maturity of fiveten years, due on June 15, 2022.March 14, 2028. These notes will be redeemable by the Bancorp, in whole or in part, on or after the date that is 30 days prior to the maturity date at a redemption price equal to 100% of the principal amount of the notes to be redeemed plus accrued and unpaid interest thereon to, but excluding, the redemption date.

Management’s DiscussionOn June 5, 2018, the Bancorp issued and Analysissold $250 million of Financial Conditionsenior floating-rate notes, with a maturity of three years, due on June 4, 2021. Interest on the floating-rate notes is3-month LIBOR plus 47 bps. These notes will be redeemable, in whole or in part, on or after the date that is 30 days prior to the maturity date at a redemption price equal to 100% of the principal amount of the notes to be redeemed plus accrued and Results of Operations (continued)

unpaid interest thereon to, but excluding, the redemption date.

2018 Branch Optimization Plan

Customer interactions and service and sales activity in Branch Banking continue to evolve with changing demographics and technology applications. Customers are increasingly utilizing digital tools to interact with their financial institutions in conducting their transactions while still utilizing physical branches for consultations and new product and service initiation. During the past three years, these developments and other business strategies led to a net decrease of 141 in the number of retail branches, or 11% of the Bancorp’s total branch count, through consolidations and sales.

The Bancorp continues to evaluate its retail network distribution in light of changes in customer behavior while developing new analytical tools that provide enhanced capabilities to optimize the profitability and growth potential of branches. In slower growth mature markets these developments enable the Bancorp to achieve efficiencies through well-executed branch consolidations without materially impacting deposit flows and/or revenue growth while maintaining the service quality standards. While continuing to evaluate such actions, the Bancorp is also focused on achieving higher retail household and deposit growth in other parts of its footprint – mainly in markets that exhibit faster economic growth and where the Bancorp has significant opportunities to capture higher market share. To that extent, based on the strategic business evaluation that was performed during the second quarter of 2018, over the next2-3 years, as part of the 2018 Branch Optimization Plan, the Bancorp plans to close between100-125 branches in more mature markets and open between100-125 new branches in higher growth markets where the Bancorp already has a strong and high performing retail branch presence. With the existing local presence and familiarity with the customer demographics, and with newly developed analytical tools, the Bancorp expects to achieve higher growth rates as a result of these actions.

As of June 30, 2018, the Bancorp had identified 29 specific branches for closure under the 2018 Branch Optimization Plan with these closures expected to be completed prior to December 31, 2018. The Bancorp expects to identify the remaining branches to be closed under the 2018 Branch Optimization Plan over the next 12 to 18 months. Additionally, the Bancorp has elected to sell 21 parcels of land which had previously been held for future branch expansion.

The adoption of the 2018 Branch Optimization Plan during the second quarter of 2018 required the Bancorp to perform assessments of the recoverability of the long-lived assets for which the Bancorp believes that it is more likely than not that the assets will be disposed of significantly before the end of their previously estimated useful lives. As a result, during the second quarter of 2018 the Bancorp recognized impairment losses of $33 million associated with these lower of cost or market adjustments in other noninterest income in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income. For further information about the 2018 Branch Optimization plan, refer to Note 7 of the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

Earnings Summary

The Bancorp’s net income available to common shareholders for the second quarter of 2018 was $563 million, or $0.80 per diluted share, which was net of $23 million in preferred stock dividends. The Bancorp’s net income available to common shareholders for the second quarter of 2017 was $344 million, or $0.45 per diluted share, which was net of $23 million in preferred stock dividends. The Bancorp’s net income available to common shareholders for the second quarter of 2016 was $305 million, or $0.39 per diluted share, which was net of $23 million in preferred stock dividends. The Bancorp’s net income available to common shareholders for the six months ended June 30, 20172018 was $634 million,$1.3 billion, or $0.83$1.77 per diluted share, which was net of $38 million in preferred stock dividends. For the six months ended June 30, 2016,2017, the Bancorp’s net income available to common shareholders was $616$634 million, or $0.79$0.83 per diluted share, which was net of $38 million in preferred stock dividends.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (continued)

Net interest income on an FTE basis(non-GAAP) was $945 million$1.0 billion and $1.9$2.0 billion for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017,2018, respectively, an increase of $37$79 million and $67$139 million compared to the same periods in the prior year. For both the three and six months ended June 30, 2017, netNet interest income was positively impacted by increases in yields on average loans and leases and increases in average taxable securities for the three and decreasessix months ended June 30, 2018 compared to the same periods in average long-term debt.the prior year. Additionally, net interest income was positively impacted by the decisions of the Federal Open Market Committee in December 2016 and March 2017FOMC to raise the target range of the federal funds rate 25 bps coupled with an increase in the net interest rate spread.December 2017, March 2018 and June 2018. These positive impacts were partially offset by decreases in average loans and leases and increases in the rates paid on average long-term debt and average interest-bearing core deposits during both the three and six months ended June 30, 2017. Net interest margin on an FTE basis(non-GAAP) was 3.01%average long-term debt for both the three and six months ended June 30, 20172018 compared to 2.88%the same periods in the prior year. Net interest margin on an FTE basis(non-GAAP) was 3.21% and 2.89%, respectively,3.19% for the samethree and six months ended June 30, 2018, respectively compared to 3.01% for both periods in the prior year.

Noninterest income decreased $35increased $179 million for the three months ended June 30, 20172018 compared to the same period in the prior year primarily due to decreasesincreases in mortgage banking net revenueother noninterest income and corporate banking revenue. MortgageOther noninterest income increased $165 million during the three months ended June 30, 2018 compared to the three months ended June 30, 2017 primarily due to the gain on sale of Worldpay, Inc. shares, partially offset by an increase in the net losses on disposition and impairment of bank premises and equipment and a reduction in the equity method income from the Bancorp’s interest in Vantiv Holding, LLC. Corporate banking net revenue decreased $20increased $19 million for the three months ended June 30, 2017 compared to the three months ended June 30, 2016 primarily due to a $17 million decrease in origination fees and gains on loan sales. Corporate banking revenue decreased $16 million for the three months ended June 30, 2017 compared to the three months ended June 30, 2016 driven by decreases in syndication fees and foreign exchange fees. Noninterest income decreased $148 million for the six months ended June 30, 20172018 compared to the same period in the prior year primarily due to decreasesincreases in institutional sales revenue, contract revenue from commercial customer derivatives and foreign exchange fees, partially offset by a decrease in letter of credit fees.

Noninterest income increased $565 million for the six months ended June 30, 2018 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2017 primarily due to increases in other noninterest income mortgage banking net revenue and corporate banking revenue. Other noninterest income decreased $55increased $548 million during the six months ended June 30, 20172018 compared to the same period in the prior year primarily due to the impactgain related to Vantiv, Inc’s acquisition of certain transactionsWorldpay Group plc. that occurredwas recognized in the first quarter of 2018 and the aforementioned gain on sale of Worldpay, Inc. shares, partially offset by an increase in the net losses on disposition and impairment of bank premises and equipment, an increase in the loss on the swap associated with the sale of Visa, Inc. Class B Shares and reduction in the equity method income from the Bancorp’s interest in Vantiv Holding, LLC. Corporate banking revenue increased $33 million during the six months ended June 30, 2016 which included valuation adjustments on the warrant associated with Vantiv Holding, LLC, gains on the sales of certain retail branch operations and gains on loan sales. These items were partially offset by a decrease in negative valuation adjustments on the swap associated with Visa, Inc. Class B Shares, and increases in private equity investment income. Mortgage banking net revenue decreased $46 million for the six months ended June 30, 2017 primarily due to decreases of $29 million in origination fees and gains on loan sales and decreases of $17 million in net mortgage servicing revenue. Corporate banking revenue decreased $44 million for the six months ended June 30, 2017 primarily due to a decrease in lease remarketing fees which included the impact of a $31 million impairment charge related to certain operating lease assets that was recognized during the first quarter of 2017 and a decrease in foreign exchange fees.

Noninterest expense decreased $26 million for the three months ended June 30, 20172018 compared to the same period in the prior year primarily due to increases in lease remarketing fees, institutional sales revenue, contract revenue from commercial customer derivatives and foreign exchange fees, partially offset by decreases in personnel costs, net occupancybusiness lending fees and letter of credit fees.

Noninterest expense card and processing expense and other noninterest expense. Personnel costs decreased $9increased $80 million for the three months ended June 30, 2017 compared to the three months ended June 30, 2016 primarily driven by decreases in long-term incentive compensation. Net occupancy costs decreased $5 million for the three months ended June 30, 20172018 compared to the same period in the prior year primarily due to lower rentincreases in personnel costs and technology and communications expense. Card and processing expense decreased $4Personnel costs increased $66 million for the three months ended June 30, 20172018 compared to the same period in the prior year driven by an increase in base compensation, variable compensation, long-term incentive compensation and severance costs. Technology and communications expense increased $10 million for the three months ended June 30, 2018 compared to the same period in the prior year driven primarily by increased investment in regulatory, compliance and growth initiatives.

Noninterest expense increased $140 million for the six months ended June 30, 2018 compared to the same period in the prior year primarily due to the impact of renegotiated service contracts. Other noninterest expense decreased $4 million for the three months ended June 30, 2017 compared to the three months ended June 30, 2016 primarily due to decreases in lossesincreases personnel costs, technology and adjustments, impairment on affordable housing investments and the provision for the reserve for unfunded commitments, partially offset by increases in professional fees, marketingcommunications expense and FDIC insurance and other taxes. Noninterest expense decreased $25noninterest expense. Personnel costs increased $102 million for the six months ended June 30, 20172018 compared to the same period in the prior year driven by an increase in base compensation, variable compensation, long-term incentive compensation and severance costs. Technology and communications expense increased $19 million for the six months ended June 30, 2018 compared to the same period in the prior year driven primarily by increased investment in regulatory, compliance and growth initiatives. Other noninterest expense increased $17 million for the six months ended June 30, 2018 compared to the same period in the prior year primarily due to decreasesincreases in other noninterest expense, card and processingthe impairment on affordable housing investments, marketing expense and net occupancydonations expense, partially offset by an increase in personnel costs. Other noninterest expense decreased $18 million for the six months ended June 30, 2017 compared to the same period in the prior year primarily due to decreases in losses and adjustments, the provisionbenefit for the reserve for unfunded commitments and impairment on affordable housing investments, partially offset by an increase in professional service fees. Card and processing expense decreased $9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2017 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2016 primarily due to the impact of renegotiated service contracts. Net occupancy expense decreased $4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2017 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2016 primarily due to lower rent expense. These items were partially offset by an increase in personnel costs of $9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2017 driven by increases in variable compensation and long-term incentive compensation, partially offset by a decrease in severance costs related to the voluntary early retirement program in 2016.commitments.

For more information on net interest income, noninterest income and noninterest expense refer to the Statements of Income Analysis section of MD&A.

Credit Summary

The provision for loan and lease losses was $52$33 million and $126$56 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017,2018, respectively, compared to $91$52 million and $210$126 million for the comparable periods in 2016.2017. Net lossescharged-off as a percent of average portfolio loans and leases decreasedincreased to 0.28%0.41% during the three months ended June 30, 20172018 compared to 0.37%0.28% during the same period in the prior year and decreasedincreased to 0.34%0.38% for the six months ended June 30, 20172018 compared to 0.39%0.34% for the same period in the prior year. At June 30, 2017,2018, nonperforming portfolio assets as a percent of portfolio loans and leases and OREO decreased to 0.72%0.52% compared to 0.80%0.53% at December 31, 2016.2017. For further discussion on credit quality refer to the Credit Risk Management subsection of the Risk Management section of MD&A.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (continued)

Capital Summary

The Bancorp’s capital ratios exceed the “well-capitalized” guidelines as defined by the PCA requirements of the U.S. banking agencies. As of June 30, 2017,2018, as calculated under the Basel III transition provisions,standardized approach, the CET1 capital ratio was 10.63%10.91%, the Tier I risk-based capital ratio was 11.76%12.02%, the Total risk-based capital ratio was 15.22%15.21% and the Tier I leverage ratio was 10.07%10.24%.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (continued)

NON-GAAP FINANCIAL MEASURES

The following arenon-GAAP measures which are importantprovide useful insight to the reader of the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements but should be supplemental to primary U.S. GAAP measures and should not be read in isolation or relied upon as a substitute for the primary U.S. GAAP measures.

The FTE basis adjusts for thetax-favored status of income from certain loans and securities held by the Bancorp that are not taxable for federal income tax purposes. The Bancorp believes this presentation to be the preferred industry measurement of net interest income as it provides a relevant comparison between taxable andnon-taxable amounts.

The following table reconciles thenon-GAAP financial measures of net interest income on an FTE basis, interest income on an FTE basis, net interest margin, net interest rate spread and the efficiency ratio on an FTE basis to U.S. GAAP:

TABLE 3:Non-GAAP Financial Measures - Net Interest Income, Net Interest MarginFinancial Measures and Efficiency RatioRatios on an FTE Basisbasis

 

 
      

    For the three months ended    

    June 30,    

          For the six months ended    
    June 30,    
 
($ in millions)     2017       2016      2017   2016   

 

 

Net interest income (U.S. GAAP)

 $    939          902     1,872       1,805     

Add: FTE adjustment

    6          6     12       12     

 

 

Net interest income on an FTE basis (1)

 $    945          908     1,884       1,817     

Net interest income on an FTE basis (annualized) (2)

    3,790          3,652     3,768       3,634     

Noninterest income (3)

 $    564          599     1,087       1,235     

Noninterest expense (4)

    957          983     1,943       1,968     

Average interest-earning assets (5)

    126,134          126,847     126,050       126,251     

Ratios:

          

Net interest margin on an FTE basis (2) / (5)

    3.01  %    2.88     3.01       2.89     

Efficiency ratio on an FTE basis (4) / (1) + (3)

    63.4          65.3     65.4       64.5     

 

 

The following table reconciles thenon-GAAP financial measure of income before income taxes on an FTE basis to U.S. GAAP:

TABLE 4:Non-GAAP Financial Measure - Income Before Income Taxes on an FTE Basis

 
       For the three months ended    
    June 30,    
         For the six months ended    
    June 30,    
      For the three months ended    
June 30,
           For the six months ended    
June 30,
 
($ in millions)   2017       2016     2017   2016      2018              2017          2018        2017  

 

 

Income before income taxes (U.S. GAAP)

 $   494          427     890       862     

Net interest income (U.S. GAAP)

 $    1,020           939       2,016    1,872     

Add: FTE adjustment

    6          6     12       12        4           6       7    12     

 

 

Income before income taxes on an FTE basis

 $   500          433     902       874     
Net interest income on an FTE basis (1) $    1,024           945       2,023    1,884     
Net interest income on an FTE basis (annualized) (2)   4,107           3,790       4,080    3,768     

 
Interest income (U.S. GAAP) $    1,269           1,106       2,474    2,192     
Add: FTE adjustment   4           6       7    12     

 

Interest income on an FTE basis

 $    1,273           1,112       2,481    2,204     

Interest income on an FTE basis (annualized) (3)

Interest income on an FTE basis (annualized) (3)

 

  5,106           4,460       5,003    4,445     

Interest expense (annualized) (4)

 $    999           670       924    645     

Noninterest income (5)

   743           564       1,652    1,087     

Noninterest expense (6)

Noninterest expense (6)

 

  1,037           957       2,083    1,943     

Average interest-earning assets (7)

Average interest-earning assets (7)

 

  128,167           126,134       127,857    126,050     

Average interest-bearing liabilities (8)

   89,222           85,320       88,419    85,106     

Ratios:

         

Net interest margin on an FTE basis (2) / (7)

   3.21 %      3.01       3.19    3.01     

Net interest spread on an FTE basis (3) / (7) - (4) / (8)

   2.86           2.75       2.86    2.77     

Efficiency ratio on an FTE basis (6) / (1) + (5)

   58.7           63.4       56.7    65.4     

 

The Bancorp believes return on average tangible common equity is an important measure for comparative purposes with other financial institutions, but is not defined under U.S. GAAP, and therefore is considered anon-GAAP financial measure. This measure is useful for evaluating the performance of a business as it calculates the return available to common shareholders without the impact of intangible assets and their related amortization.

The following table reconciles thenon-GAAP financial measure of return on average tangible common equity to U.S. GAAP:

TABLE 5:4:Non-GAAP Financial Measures - Return on Average Tangible Common Equity

 

    

  For the three months ended    
  June 30,    

    

      For the six months ended    
  June 30,     

($ in millions)   2017            2016(a)             2017       2016(a)         

 

Net income available to common shareholders (U.S. GAAP)

 $ 344        305    634   616     

Add: Intangible amortization, net of tax

  -             1     

 

Tangible net income available to common shareholders $ 344        305    635   617     
Tangible net income available to common shareholders (annualized) (1)  1,380        1,227    1,270   1,234     
Average Bancorp shareholders’ equity (U.S. GAAP) $ 16,615        16,584    16,522   16,479     
Less: Average preferred stock  (1,331)       (1,331)   (1,331)  (1,331)    

 Average goodwill

  (2,424)       (2,416)   (2,420)  (2,416)    

 Average intangible assets and other servicing rights

  (18)       (11)   (14)  (12)    

 

Average tangible common equity (2) $ 12,842        12,826    12,757   12,720     

Return on average tangible common equity (1) / (2)

  10.7 %   9.6    10.0   9.8     

 

(a)

Net tax deficiencies of $5 and $6 were reclassified from capital surplus to applicable income tax expense for the three and six months ended June 30, 2016, respectively, related to the early adoption of ASU2016-09 during the fourth quarter of 2016, with an effective date of January 1, 2016.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (continued)

 

 
       For the three months ended    
June 30,
            For the six months ended    
June 30,
 
($ in millions)    2018              2017               2018            2017        

 

 

Net income available to common shareholders (U.S. GAAP)

 $    563           344        1,252         634      

Add: Intangible amortization, net of tax

   1           -        2         1      

 

 
Tangible net income available to common shareholders $    564           344        1,254         635      
Tangible net income available to common shareholders (annualized) (1)   2,262           1,380        2,529         1,270      
Average Bancorp shareholders’ equity (U.S. GAAP) $    16,108           16,615        16,209         16,522      
Less: Average preferred stock   (1,331)          (1,331)       (1,331)        (1,331)     

 Average goodwill

   (2,462)          (2,424)       (2,458)        (2,420)     

 Average intangible assets

   (30)          (18)       (28)        (14)     

 

 
Average tangible common equity (2) $    12,285           12,842        12,392         12,757      

Return on average tangible common equity (1) / (2)

   18.4 %      10.7        20.4         10.0      

 

 

The Bancorp considers various measures when evaluating capital utilization and adequacy, including the tangible equity ratio and tangible common equity ratio, and tangible book value per share, in addition to capital ratios defined by the U.S. banking agencies. These calculations are intended to complement the capital ratios defined by the U.S. banking agencies for both absolute and comparative purposes. Because U.S. GAAP does not include capital ratio measures, the Bancorp believes there are no comparable U.S. GAAP financial measures to these ratios. These ratios are not formally defined by U.S. GAAP or codified in the federal banking regulations and, therefore, are considered to benon-GAAP financial measures. Additionally, the Bancorp became subject to the Basel III Final Rule on January 1, 2015 which defined various regulatory capital ratios including the CET1 ratio. The CET1 capital ratio has transition provisions that will be phased out over time. The Bancorp is presenting the CET1 capital ratio on a fullyphased-in basis for comparative purposes with other organizations. The Bancorp considers the fullyphased-in CET1 ratio anon-GAAP measure since it is not the CET1 ratio in effect for the periods presented. Since analysts and the U.S. banking agencies may assess the Bancorp’s capital adequacy using these ratios, the Bancorp believes they are useful to provide investors the ability to assess its capital adequacy on the same basis. The Bancorp encourages readers to consider its Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements in their entirety and not to rely on any single financial measure.

The following table reconcilesnon-GAAP capital ratios to U.S. GAAP:

TABLE 6:Non-GAAP Financial Measures - Capital Ratios

As of ($ in millions)  June 30,  
2017     
  December 31,    
2016            
 

Total Bancorp Shareholders’ Equity (U.S. GAAP)

  $16,419   16,205      

Less:   Preferred stock

   (1,331  (1,331)     

Goodwill

   (2,423  (2,416)     

Intangible assets

   (18  (10)     

Tangible common equity, including unrealized gains / losses (1)

   12,647   12,448      

Less: AOCI

   (163  (59)     

Tangible common equity, excluding unrealized gains / losses (2)

   12,484   12,389      

Add:  Preferred stock

   1,331   1,331      

Tangible equity (3)

  $13,815   13,720      

Total Assets (U.S. GAAP)

  $141,067   142,177      

Less:  Goodwill

   (2,423  (2,416)     

Intangible assets

   (18  (10)     

AOCI, before tax

   (251  (91)     

Tangible assets, excluding unrealized gains / losses (4)

  $138,375   139,660      

Common shares outstanding (5)

   739   750      

Ratios:

   

Tangible equity as a percentage of tangible assets (3) / (4)

   9.98 %   9.82      

Tangible common equity as a percentage of tangible assets (2) / (4)

   9.02   8.87      

Tangible book value per share (1) / (5)

  $17.11   16.60      

Basel III Final Rule - Transition to FullyPhased-In

         

CET1 capital (transitional)

  $12,522   12,426      

Less: Adjustments to CET1 capital from transitional to fullyphased-in(a)

   (4  (4)     

CET1 capital (fullyphased-in) (6)

   12,518   12,422      

Risk-weighted assets (transitional)(b)

   117,761   119,632      

Add: Adjustments to risk-weighted assets from transitional to fullyphased-in(c)

   1,274   1,115      

Risk-weighted assets (fullyphased-in) (7)

  $              119,035   120,747      

CET1 capital ratio under Basel III Final Rule (fullyphased-in) (6) / (7)

   10.52 %   10.29      
(a)

Primarily relates to disallowed intangible assets (other than goodwill and MSRs, net of associated deferred tax liabilities).

(b)

Under the banking agencies’ risk-based capital guidelines, assets and credit equivalent amounts of derivatives andoff-balance sheet exposures are assigned to broad risk categories. The aggregate dollar amount in each risk category is multiplied by the associated risk-weight of the category. The resulting weighted values are added together, along with the measure for market risk, resulting in the Bancorp’s total risk-weighted assets.

(c)

Primarily relates to higher risk weighting for MSRs.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (continued)

 

The following table reconcilesnon-GAAP capital ratios to U.S. GAAP:

TABLE 5:Non-GAAP Financial Measures - Capital Ratios

 

 
As of ($ in millions)    June 30,      
2018        
   December 31,      
2017        
 

 

 

Total Bancorp Shareholders’ Equity (U.S. GAAP)

  $  16,232         16,365          

Less: Preferred stock

    (1,331)        (1,331)         

 Goodwill

    (2,462)        (2,445)         

 Intangible assets

    (30)        (27)         

 AOCI

    552         (73)         

 

 

Tangible common equity, excluding unrealized gains / losses (1)

    12,961         12,489          

Add: Preferred stock

    1,331         1,331          

 

 

Tangible equity (2)

  $  14,292         13,820          

 

 

Total Assets (U.S. GAAP)

  $  140,695         142,193          

Less: Goodwill

    (2,462)        (2,445)         

 Intangible assets

    (30)        (27)         

 AOCI, before tax

    699         (92)         

 

 

Tangible assets, excluding unrealized gains / losses (3)

  $  138,902         139,629          

 

 

Ratios:

     

Tangible equity as a percentage of tangible assets (2) / (3)

    10.29 %    9.90          

Tangible common equity as a percentage of tangible assets (1) / (3)

    9.33         8.94          

 

 

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (continued)

 

RECENT ACCOUNTING STANDARDS

Note 3 of the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements provides a discussion of the significant new accounting standards applicable to the Bancorp and the expected impact of significant accounting standards issued, but not yet required to be adopted.

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES

The Bancorp’s Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements are prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP. Certain accounting policies require management to exercise judgment in determining methodologies, economic assumptions and estimates that may materially affect the Bancorp’s financial position, results of operations and cash flows. The Bancorp’s critical accounting policies include the accounting for the ALLL, reserve for unfunded commitments, income taxes, valuation of servicing rights, fair value measurements, goodwill and legal contingencies. These accounting policies are discussed in detail in the Critical Accounting Policies section of the Bancorp’s Annual Report on Form10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016. Effective January 1, 2017, the Bancorp elected to adopt the fair value method of measuring all existing classes of its residential mortgage servicing rights as described below. Previously, the Bancorp had measured its servicing rights subsequent to initial recognition using the amortization method.2017. There have been no other material changes to the valuation techniques or models during the six months ended June 30, 2017.2018.

Valuation of Servicing Rights

When the Bancorp sells loans through either securitizations or individual loan sales in accordance with its investment policies, it often obtains servicing rights. The Bancorp may also purchase servicing rights from time to time. Effective January 1, 2017, the Bancorp elected to prospectively adopt the fair value method for all existing classes of its residential mortgage servicing rights portfolio. Upon this election, all servicing rights are measured at fair value at each reporting date and changes in the fair value of servicing rights are reported in earnings in the period in which the changes occur. Servicing rights are valued using internal OAS models. Significant management judgment is necessary to identify key economic assumptions used in estimating the fair value of the servicing rights including the prepayment speeds of the underlying loans, the weighted-average life, the OAS spread and the weighted-average coupon rate, as applicable. The primary risk of material changes to the value of the servicing rights resides in the potential volatility in the economic assumptions used, particularly the prepayment speeds. In order to assist in the assessment of the fair value of servicing rights, the Bancorp obtains external valuations of the servicing rights portfolio from third parties and participates in peer surveys that provide additional confirmation of the reasonableness of key assumptions utilized in the internal OAS model.

Prior to the election of the fair value method, servicing rights were initially recorded at fair value and subsequently amortized in proportion to, and over the period of, estimated net servicing revenue. Servicing rights were assessed for impairment monthly, based on fair value, with temporary impairment recognized through a valuation allowance and other-than-temporary impairment recognized through awrite-off of the servicing asset and related valuation allowance.

For additional information on servicing rights, refer to Note 11 of the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (continued)

 

 

STATEMENTS OF INCOME ANALYSIS

Net Interest Income

Net interest income is the interest earned on loans and leases (including yield-related fees), securities and other short-term investments less the interest paid for core deposits (includes transaction deposits and other time deposits) and wholesale funding (includes certificates $100,000 and over, other deposits, federal funds purchased, other short-term borrowings and long-term debt). The net interest margin is calculated by dividing net interest income by average interest-earning assets. Net interest rate spread is the difference between the average yield earned on interest-earning assets and the average rate paid on interest-bearing liabilities. Net interest margin is typically greater than net interest rate spread due to the interest income earned on those assets that are funded by noninterest-bearing liabilities, or free funding, such as demand deposits or shareholders’ equity.

Tables 76 and 87 present the components of net interest income, net interest margin and net interest rate spread for the three and six months ended June 30, 20172018 and 2016,2017, as well as the relative impact of changes in the balance sheet and changes in interest rates on net interest income. Nonaccrual loans and leases and loans and leases held for sale have been included in the average loan and lease balances. Average outstanding securities balances are based on amortized cost with any unrealized gains or losses onavailable-for-sale and other securities included in other assets.

Net interest income on an FTE basis(non-GAAP) was $945 million$1.0 billion and $1.9$2.0 billion for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017,2018, respectively, an increase of $37$79 million and $67$139 million compared to the same periods in the prior year. Net interest income was positively impacted by an increase in yields on average loans and leases of 2956 bps and 49 bps for the three months ended June 30, 2017 and an increase of 26 bps for the six months ended June 30, 2017 which included the impact of a $12 million benefit in interest income related to a revised estimate of refunds to be offered to certain bankcard customers. Net interest income also benefited from2018, respectively and increases in average taxable securities of $2.1$1.3 billion for both the three and six months ended June 30, 2017 and decreases in average long-term debt of $2.1 billion and $1.6 billion for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017, respectively,2018 compared to the same periods in the prior year. Additionally, net interest income was positively impacted by the decisions of the Federal Open Market Committee in December 2016 and March 2017FOMC to raise the target range of the federal funds rate 25 bps coupled with an increasein December 2017, March 2018 and June 2018. These positive impacts were partially offset by increases in the net interest rate spread to 2.75%rates paid on average interest-bearing core deposits and 2.77% duringaverage long-term debt for both the three and six months ended June 30, 2017,2018 compared to the same periods in the prior year. The rates paid on average interest-bearing core deposits increased 31 bps and 25 bps, respectively, from 2.67%for the three and 2.68%six months ended June 30, 2018 compared to the same periods in the prior year. The rates paid on average long-term debt increased 35 bps and 27 bps for the three and six months ended June 30, 2018, respectively, compared to the same periods in the prior year.

Net interest rate spread on an FTE basis(non-GAAP) was 2.86% during both the three and six months ended June 30, 2018 compared to 2.75% and 2.77% in the same periods in the prior year. Yields on average interest-earning assets increased 2044 bps and 1938 bps for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017,2018, respectively, partially offset by a 1233 bps and 1029 bps increase in rates paid on average interest-bearing liabilities for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017,2018, respectively, compared to the same periods in the prior year. These positive impacts were partially offset by decreases in average loans and leases and increases in the rates paid on average long term debt and interest-bearing core deposits for both the three and six months ended June 30, 2017 compared to the same periods in the prior year. Average loans and leases decreased $2.2 billion and $1.7 billion for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017, respectively, compared to the same periods in the prior year. The rates paid on average long-term debt increased 40 bps and 42 bps, respectively, and the rates paid on average interest-bearing core deposits increased 8 bps and 7 bps, respectively, for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017 compared to the same periods in the prior year.

Net interest margin on an FTE basis(non-GAAP) was 3.21% and 3.19% for the three and six months ended June 30, 2018, respectively, compared to 3.01% for both the three and six months ended June 30, 2017 compared to 2.88% and 2.89% for the three and six months ended June 30, 2016, respectively.2017. The increase for both periods was driven primarily by the previously mentioned increases in the net interest rate spread coupled withpartially offset by decreases in average free funding balances. The decreases in average free funding balances for both periods were driven by a decrease in average interest-earning assetsdemand deposits of $713 million$2.1 billion and $201 million$1.7 billion for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017, respectively, compared to the same periods in the prior year partially offset by a decrease in average free funding balances. The decrease in average free funding balances for both periods was driven by a decrease in average demand deposits of $997 million and $558 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017, respectively, compared to the same periods in the prior year partially offset by an increase in average shareholders’ equity of $26 million and $38 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017,2018, respectively, compared to the same periods in the prior year.

Interest income on an FTE basis from loans and leases(non-GAAP) increased $50$136 million and $83$232 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017,2018, respectively, compared to the same periods in the prior year. The increase for both periods was driven byincreases were primarily due to the previously mentionedaforementioned increases in yields on average loans and leases, partially offset by decreasesas well as increases in the volume of average loans and leases. Average loans and leases decreased for both periods primarily due to decreases in average commercial and industrial loans and average automobile loans partially offset by an increase in average residential mortgageother consumer loans. For more information on the Bancorp’s loan and lease portfolio, refer to the Loans and Leases subsection of the Balance Sheet Analysis section of MD&A. Interest income from investment securities and other short-term investments increased $10$25 million and $24$45 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017,2018, respectively, compared to the same periods in the prior year primarily as a result of the aforementioned increases in average taxable securities.

Interest expense on core deposits increased $14$56 million and $25$91 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017,2018, respectively, compared to the same periods in the prior year. TheseThe increases were primarily due to increases in the cost of average interest-bearing core deposits to 65 bps and 58 bps for the three and six months ended June 30, 2018, respectively, from 34 bps and 33 bps for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017, respectively, from 26 bps for both the three and six months ended June 30, 2016.respectively. The increaseincreases in the cost of average interest-bearing core deposits for both periods waswere primarily due to increases in the cost ofrates paid on average interest checking deposits and average money market deposits. Refer to the Deposits subsection of the Balance Sheet Analysis section of MD&A for additional information on the Bancorp’s deposits.

Interest expense on average wholesale funding increased $9$26 million and $15$47 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017,2018, respectively, compared to the same periods in the prior year primarily due to the previously mentionedaforementioned increases in the rates paid on average long-term debt partially offset by the aforementioned decreasescoupled with increases in average long-term debt. Refer to the Borrowings subsection of the Balance Sheet Analysis section of MD&A for additional information on the Bancorp’s borrowings. During both the three and six months ended June 30, 2017,2018, average wholesale funding represented 24% and 23% of average interest-bearing liabilities respectively, compared to 27%24% and 26%23% during the three and six months ended June 30, 2016,2017, respectively. For more information on the Bancorp’s interest rate risk management, including estimated earnings sensitivity to changes in market interest rates, see the Market Risk Management subsection of the Risk Management section of MD&A.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (continued)

 

 

TABLE 7: Condensed Average Balance Sheets and Analysis of Net Interest Income on an FTE Basis 
TABLE 6: Condensed Average Balance Sheets and Analysis of Net Interest Income on an FTE BasisTABLE 6: Condensed Average Balance Sheets and Analysis of Net Interest Income on an FTE Basis

 

For the three months ended  June 30, 2017 June 30, 2016 Attribution of Change in
Net Interest Income(a)
   June 30, 2018 June 30, 2017 Attribution of Change in
Net Interest Income(a)
 
($ in millions)  Average
Balance
   Revenue/
Cost
   Average
Yield/
Rate
 Average
Balance
   Revenue/
Cost
   Average
Yield/
Rate
 Volume   Yield/Rate   Total   Average
Balance
   Revenue/
Cost
   Average
Yield/
Rate
 Average
Balance
   Revenue/
Cost
   Average
Yield/
Rate
 Volume   Yield/Rate   Total 

Assets:

                                

Interest-earning assets:

                                

Loans and leases:(b)

                                

Commercial and industrial loans

  $41,656    374    3.60 $43,878    354    3.25 $(17)     37      20   $42,327    449    4.26 $41,656    374    3.60 $    6      69      75 

Commercial mortgage loans

   6,861    63    3.65  6,835    55    3.28  2      6      8    6,521    72    4.43  6,861    63    3.65  (4)     13      9 

Commercial construction loans

   4,306    43    4.01  3,551    30    3.36  7      6      13    4,743    59    4.94  4,306    43    4.01  5      11      16 

Commercial leases

   4,039    27    2.73  3,904    27    2.71   -      -      -    3,847    27    2.82  4,039    27    2.73  (1)     1      - 

Total commercial loans and leases

   56,862    507    3.57  58,168    466    3.22  (8)     49      41    57,438    607    4.24  56,862    507    3.57  6      94      100 

Residential mortgage loans

   16,024    141    3.54  14,842    132    3.57        10      (1)     9    16,213    144    3.56  16,024    141    3.54  2      1      3 

Home equity

   7,385    77    4.20  8,059    76    3.81  (7)     8      1    6,672    81    4.85  7,385    77    4.20  (7)     11      4 

Automobile loans

   9,410    67    2.87  10,887    73    2.68  (11)     5      (6)    8,968    73    3.26  9,410    67    2.87  (3)     9      6 

Credit card

   2,080    57    10.95  2,198    57    10.47  (3)     3      -    2,221    66    11.96  2,080    57    10.95  4      5      9 

Other consumer loans and leases

   892    15    6.63  653    10    6.36  5      -      5 

Total consumer loans and leases

   35,791    357    4.01  36,639    348    3.82  (6)     15      9 

Other consumer loans

   1,720    29    6.75  892    15    6.63  14      -      14 

Total consumer loans

   35,794    393    4.40  35,791    357    4.01        10      26      36 

Total loans and leases

  $92,653    864    3.74 $94,807    814    3.45 $(14)     64      50   $93,232    1,000    4.30 $92,653    864    3.74 $16      120      136 

Securities:

                                

Taxable

   32,092    244    3.05  30,002    235    3.16  17      (8)     9    33,380    266    3.20  32,092    244    3.05  10      12      22 

Exempt from income taxes(b)

   68    1    5.10  85    1    4.09   -      -      -    81    1    4.03  68    1    5.10   -      -      - 

Other short-term investments

   1,321    3    0.99  1,953    2    0.43  (1)     2      1    1,474    6    1.62  1,321    3    0.99  1      2      3 

Total interest-earning assets

  $126,134    1,112    3.54 $126,847    1,052    3.34 $2      58      60   $128,167    1,273    3.98 $126,134    1,112    3.54 $27      134      161 

Cash and due from banks

   2,175      2,228             2,179      2,175          

Other assets

   13,272      15,140             12,320      13,272          

Allowance for loan and lease losses

   (1,237)       (1,295)                (1,137)       (1,237)             

Total assets

  $      140,344       $     142,920               $      141,529       $     140,344             

Liabilities and Equity:

                                

Interest-bearing liabilities:

                                

Interest checking deposits

  $26,014    25    0.38 $24,714    14    0.22 $1      10      11   $28,715    55    0.76 $26,014    25    0.38 $3      27      30 

Savings deposits

   14,238    2    0.06  14,576    2    0.05   -      -      -    13,618    3    0.10  14,238    2    0.06   -      1      1 

Money market deposits

   20,278    17    0.34  19,243    13    0.26   -      4      4    22,036    39    0.71  20,278    17    0.34  2      20      22 

Foreign office deposits

   380    -    0.18  484    -    0.15   -      -      -    371    1    0.45  380    -    0.18  1      -      1 

Other time deposits

   3,745    11    1.23  4,044    12    1.24  (1)     -      (1)    4,018    13    1.34  3,745    11    1.23  1      1      2 

Total interest-bearing core deposits

   64,655    55    0.34  63,061    41    0.26   -      14      14    68,758    111    0.65  64,655    55    0.34  7      49      56 

Certificates $100,000 and over

   2,623    9    1.36  2,819    9    1.29   -      -      -    2,155    7    1.35  2,623    9    1.36  (2)     -      (2

Other deposits

   264    1    0.98  467    -    0.40   -      1      1    198    1    1.80  264    1    0.98  (1)     1      - 

Federal funds purchased

   311    1    0.94  693    1    0.39  (1)     1      -    1,080    5    1.76  311    1    0.94  3      1      4 

Other short-term borrowings

   4,194    10    0.93  3,754    3    0.36  1      6      7    2,452    11    1.84  4,194    10    0.93  (6)     7      1 

Long-term debt

   13,273    91    2.76  15,351    90    2.36  (13)     14      1    14,579    114    3.11  13,273    91    2.76  11      12      23 

Total interest-bearing liabilities

  $85,320    167    0.79 $86,145    144    0.67 $(13)     36      23   $89,222    249    1.12 $85,320    167    0.79 $12      70      82 

Demand deposits

   34,915      35,912             32,834      34,915          

Other liabilities

   3,467       4,247                3,345       3,467             

Total liabilities

  $123,702      $126,304            $125,401      $123,702          

Total equity

  $16,642       $16,616               $16,128       $16,642             

Total liabilities and equity

  $140,344       $142,920               $141,529       $140,344             

Net interest income (FTE)(c)

    $945      $908    $15      22      37     $1,024      $945    $15      64      79 

Net interest margin (FTE)(c)

       3.01      2.88            3.21      3.01     

Net interest rate spread (FTE)(c)

       2.75       2.67             2.86       2.75      

Interest-bearing liabilities to interest-earning assets

Interest-bearing liabilities to interest-earning assets

 

      67.64        67.91        

Interest-bearing liabilities to interest-earning assets

 

      69.61        67.64        
(a)

Changes in interest not solely due to volume or yield/rate are allocated in proportion to the absolute dollar amount of change in volume and yield/rate.

(b)

The FTE adjustments included in the above table were$64and $6 for both the three months endedJune 30, 20172018 and 2016.2017, respectively.

(c)

Net interest income (FTE), net interest margin (FTE) and net interest marginrate spread (FTE) arenon-GAAP measures. For further information, refer to theNon-GAAP Financial Measures section of MD&A.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (continued)

 

 

TABLE 8:7: Condensed Average Balance Sheets and Analysis of Net Interest Income on an FTE Basis

For the six months ended  June 30, 2017 June 30, 2016 Attribution of Change in
Net Interest Income(a)
   

June 30, 2018

 

June 30, 2017

 

Attribution of Change in

Net Interest Income(a)

 
($ in millions)  Average
Balance
   Revenue/
Cost
   Average
Yield/
Rate
 Average
Balance
   Revenue/
Cost
   Average
Yield/
Rate
 Volume   Yield/Rate   Total   

Average

Balance

   

Revenue/

Cost

   

Average

Yield/

Rate

 

Average

Balance

   

Revenue/

Cost

   

Average

Yield/

Rate

 

Volume

   

Yield/Rate

   

Total

 

Assets:

                                

Interest-earning assets:

                                

Loans and leases:(b)

                                

Commercial and industrial loans

  $41,773    732    3.53 $43,503    701    3.24 $(31)     62      31   $42,064    858    4.11 $41,773    732    3.53 $5      121      126 

Commercial mortgage loans

   6,903    123    3.60  6,871    112    3.28   -      11      11    6,555    140    4.32  6,903    123    3.60  (7)     24      17 

Commercial construction loans

   4,147    80    3.89  3,424    57    3.37      13      10      23    4,707    111    4.77  4,147    80    3.89  12      19      31 

Commercial leases

   3,972    54    2.71  3,889    53    2.74  2      (1)     1    3,903    54    2.80  3,972    54    2.71  (2)     2      - 

Total commercial loans and leases

   56,795    989    3.51  57,687    923    3.22  (16)     82      66    57,229    1,163    4.10  56,795    989    3.51  8      166      174 

Residential mortgage loans

   15,912    280    3.55  14,623    262    3.60  21      (3)     18    16,150    287    3.58  15,912    280    3.55  5      2      7 

Home equity

   7,482    152    4.09  8,150    154    3.80  (13)     11      (2)    6,780    159    4.74  7,482    152    4.09  (16)     23      7 

Automobile loans

   9,597    135    2.84  11,086    147    2.66  (21)     9      (12)    9,016    143    3.19  9,597    135    2.84  (8)     16      8 

Credit card

   2,111    125    11.95  2,238    118    10.56  (8)     15      7    2,223    134    12.16  2,111    125    11.95  7      2      9 

Other consumer loans and leases

   824    27    6.57  659    21    6.31  5      1      6 

Total consumer loans and leases

   35,926    719    4.04  36,756    702    3.83  (16)     33      17 

Other consumer loans

   1,653    54    6.67  824    27    6.57  27      -      27 

Total consumer loans

   35,822    777    4.38  35,926    719    4.04  15      43      58 

Total loans and leases

  $92,721    1,708    3.72 $94,443    1,625    3.46 $(32)     115      83   $93,051    1,940    4.21 $92,721    1,708    3.72 $23      209      232 

Securities:

                                

Taxable

   31,954    488    3.08  29,811    467    3.15  31      (10)     21    33,257    529    3.21  31,954    488    3.08  21      20      41 

Exempt from income taxes(b)

   61    2    5.41  82    1    4.20  1      -      1    77    1    2.79  61    2    5.41   -      (1)     (1

Other short-term investments

   1,314    6    0.86  1,915    4    0.42  (1)     3      2    1,472    11    1.50  1,314    6    0.86   -      5      5 

Total interest-earning assets

  $126,050    2,204    3.53 $126,251    2,097    3.34 $(1)     108      107   $127,857    2,481    3.91 $126,050    2,204    3.53 $44      233      277 

Cash and due from banks

   2,190      2,282             2,177      2,190          

Other assets

   13,248      15,002             12,679      13,248          

Allowance for loan and lease losses

   (1,245)       (1,284)                (1,166)       (1,245)             

Total assets

  $     140,243       $     142,251               $     141,547       $     140,243             

Liabilities and Equity:

                                

Interest-bearing liabilities:

                                

Interest checking deposits

  $26,385    45    0.34 $25,227    28    0.23 $2      15      17   $28,560    99    0.70 $26,385    45    0.34 $4      50      54 

Savings deposits

   14,178    4    0.05  14,589    4    0.05   -      -      -    13,582    6    0.08  14,178    4    0.05   -      2      2 

Money market deposits

   20,440    34    0.33  18,949    24    0.25  2      8      10    21,397    66    0.62  20,440    34    0.33  1      31      32 

Foreign office deposits

   417    -    0.15  484    -    0.15   -      -      -    432    1    0.27  417    -    0.15  1      -      1 

Other time deposits

   3,786    23    1.23  4,039    25    1.23  (2)     -      (2)    3,937    25    1.30  3,786    23    1.23  1      1      2 

Total interest-bearing core deposits

   65,206    106    0.33  63,288    81    0.26  2      23      25    67,908    197    0.58  65,206    106    0.33  7      84      91 

Certificates $100,000 and over

   2,601    17    1.36  2,817    18    1.29  (2)     1      (1)    2,220    16    1.42  2,601    17    1.36  (2)     1      (1

Other deposits

   213    1    0.85  234    -    0.40  1      -      1    288    2    1.57  213    1    0.85   -      1      1 

Federal funds purchased

   474    2    0.78  651    1    0.37   -      1      1    887    7    1.63  474    2    0.78  2      3      5 

Other short-term borrowings

   3,050    12    0.81  3,659    7    0.37  (2)     7      5    2,438    19    1.60  3,050    12    0.81  (3)     10      7 

Long-term debt

   13,562    182    2.71  15,148    173    2.29  (20)     29      9    14,678    217    2.98  13,562    182    2.71  16      19      35 

Total interest-bearing liabilities

  $85,106    320    0.76 $85,797    280    0.66 $(21)     61      40   $88,419    458    1.05 $85,106    320    0.76 $20      118      138 

Demand deposits

   34,999      35,557             33,327      34,999          

Other liabilities

   3,589       4,386                3,571       3,589             

Total liabilities

  $123,694      $125,740            $125,317      $123,694          

Total equity

  $16,549       $16,511               $16,230       $16,549             

Total liabilities and equity

  $140,243       $142,251               $141,547       $140,243             

Net interest income (FTE)(c)

    $1,884      $1,817    $20      47      67     $2,023      $1,884    $24      115      139 

Net interest margin (FTE)(c)

       3.01      2.89            3.19      3.01     

Net interest rate spread (FTE)(c)

       2.77       2.68             2.86       2.77      

Interest-bearing liabilities to interest-earning assets

Interest-bearing liabilities to interest-earning assets

 

   67.52        67.96        

Interest-bearing liabilities to interest-earning assets

 

   69.15        67.52        
(a)

Changes in interest not solely due to volume or yield/rate are allocated in proportion to the absolute dollar amount of change in volume and yield/rate.

(b)

The FTE adjustments included in the above table were$127and $12for both the six months endedJune 30, 20172018 and 2016.2017, respectively.

(c)

Net interest income (FTE), net interest margin (FTE) and net interest marginrate spread (FTE) arenon-GAAP measures. For further information, refer to theNon-GAAP Financial Measures section of MD&A.

Provision for Loan and Lease Losses

The Bancorp provides as an expense an amount for probable loan and lease losses within the loan and lease portfolio that is based on factors previously discussed in the Critical Accounting Policies section of the Bancorp’s Annual Report on Form10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016.2017. The provision is recorded to bring the ALLL to a level deemed appropriate by the Bancorp to cover losses inherent in the portfolio. Actual credit losses on loans and leases are charged against the ALLL. The amount of loans and leases actually removed from the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets areis referred to as charge-offs.acharge-off. Net charge-offs include current period charge-offs less recoveries on previouslycharged-off loans and leases.

The provision for loan and lease losses was $52$33 million and $126$56 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017,2018, respectively, compared to $91$52 million and $210$126 million during the same periods in the prior year. The decrease in provision expense for both periodsthe three and six months ended June 30, 2018 was primarily due to thea decrease in the level of commercial criticized assets which reflected improvement in the national economy and stabilization of commodity prices, and a decrease in outstanding loan balances.combined with overall improved credit quality. The ALLL decreased $27$119 million from December 31, 20162017 to $1.2$1.1 billion at June 30, 2017.2018. At June 30, 2017,2018, the ALLL as a percent of portfolio loans and leases decreased to 1.34%1.17% compared to 1.36%1.30% at December 31, 2016.2017.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (continued)

 

 

Refer to the Credit Risk Management subsection of the Risk Management section of MD&A as well as Note 6 of the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for more detailed information on the provision for loan and lease losses, including an analysis of loan and lease portfolio composition, nonperforming assets, net charge-offs and other factors considered by the Bancorp in assessing the credit quality of the loan and lease portfolio and the ALLL.

Noninterest Income

Noninterest income decreased $35increased $179 million and $148$565 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017,2018, respectively, compared to the same periods in the prior year.

The following table presents the components of noninterest income:

TABLE 9:8: Components of Noninterest Income

    For the three months ended
June 30,
       For the six months ended
June 30,
        For the three months ended
June 30,
       For the six months ended
June 30,
    
($ in millions)        2017       2016     % Change    2017   2016 % Change         2018       2017     % Change    2018   2017 % Change 

Service charges on deposits

 $  139       138     1    $  277       274     1    $  137       139     (1)   $  275       277     (1)  

Wealth and asset management revenue

   103       101     2      211       203     4      108       103     5      221       211     5   

Corporate banking revenue

   101       117     (14)     175       219     (20)     120       101     19      208       175     19   

Card and processing revenue

   79       82     (4)     153       161     (5)     84       79     6      163       153     7   

Mortgage banking net revenue

   55       75     (27)     108       154     (30)     53       55     (4)     109       108     1   

Other noninterest income

   85       80     6      160       215     (26)     250       85     194      708       160     343   

Securities gains, net

   -       6     (100)     1       9     (89)  

Securities gains, net,non-qualifying hedges on MSRs

  2       -     NM    2       -     NM  

Securities (losses) gains, net

   (5)      -     NM     (15)      1     NM  

Securities (losses) gains, net -non-qualifying hedges on MSRs

  (4)      2     NM    (17)      2     NM  

Total noninterest income

 $  564       599     (6)   $  1,087       1,235     (12)   $  743       564     32    $  1,652       1,087     52   

Wealth and asset management revenue

Wealth and asset management revenue increased $2$5 million and $8$10 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017,2018, respectively, compared to the same periods in the prior year. The increase for both the three and six months ended June 30, 20172018 compared to the same periods in the prior year was primarily due to increases of $1$3 million and $6$8 million, respectively, in private client service fees driven by an increase in assets under management as a result of strong market performance and increased asset production. The increase for the six months ended June 30, 2017 compared to the same period in the prior year also included a $2 million increase in securities and brokerage fees. The Bancorp’s trust and registered investment advisory businesses had approximately $330$368 billion and $305$330 billion in total assets under care at June 30, 20172018 and 2016,2017, respectively, and managed $34$37 billion and $30$34 billion in assets for individuals, corporations andnot-for-profit organizations at June 30, 20172018 and 2016,2017, respectively.

Corporate banking revenue

Corporate banking revenue decreased $16increased $19 million and $44$33 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017,2018, respectively, compared to the same periods in the prior year. The decreaseincrease for the three months ended June 30, 20172018 compared to the same period in the prior year was primarily driven by an $8increases in institutional sales revenue, contract revenue from commercial customer derivatives and foreign exchange fees of $11 million, $5 million and $4 million, respectively. These benefits were partially offset by a decrease in syndicationletter of credit fees and an $8 million decrease in foreign exchange fees.of $2 million. The decreaseincrease for the six months ended June 30, 20172018 compared to the same period in the prior year was primarily driven by a decreaseincreases in lease remarketing fees, whichinstitutional sales revenue, contract revenue from commercial customer derivatives and foreign exchange fees of $26 million, $7 million, $6 million and $5 million, respectively. The increase in lease remarketing fees for the six months ended June 30, 2018 included the impact of a $31 million impairment charge related to certain operating lease assets that was recognized during the first quarter of 2017. The decrease for the six months ended June 30, 2017 compared to the same periodThese benefits were partially offset by decreases in the prior year also included a $10business lending fees and letter of credit fees of $6 million decrease in foreign exchange fees.and $4 million, respectively.

Card and processing revenue

Card and processing revenue decreased $3increased $5 million and $8$10 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017, respectively,2018 compared to the same periods in the prior year. The decreasesincreases for both the three and six months ended June 30, 20172018 compared to the same periods in the prior year were primarily driven by higher reward costs. The decrease for the six months ended June 30, 2017 compared to the same periodan increase in the prior year also included the impactnumber of the sale of the agent bankcard portfolio during the second quarter of 2016.actively used cards and customer spend volume.

Mortgage banking net revenue

Mortgage banking net revenue decreased $20 million and $46$2 million for the three months ended June 30, 2018 and increased $1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2017, respectively,2018 compared to the same periods in the prior year.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (continued)

 

 

The following table presents the components of mortgage banking net revenue:

TABLE 10:9: Components of Mortgage Banking Net Revenue

   For the three months ended  
June 30,
 

  For the six months ended  
June 30,

   For the three months ended    
June 30,
 

For the six months ended  
June 30,

($ in millions) 2017   2016       2017     2016          2018   2017       2018       2017  

Origination fees and gains on loan sales

 $  37  54       66     95       $  28  37       52     66  

Net mortgage servicing revenue:

            

Gross mortgage servicing fees

   49  50       97     102         54  49       106     97  

MSR amortization

   -  (35)      -     (61)     

Net valuation adjustments on MSRs and free-standing derivatives purchased to economically hedge MSRs

   (31 6       (55)    18        (29 (31)      (49)    (55) 

Net mortgage servicing revenue

   18  21       42     59        25  18       57     42  

Mortgage banking net revenue

 $  55  75       108     154       $  53  55       109     108  

Origination fees and gains on loan sales decreased $17 million for the three months ended June 30, 2017 compared to the same period in the prior year driven by a decrease in originations. Origination fees and gains on loan sales decreased $29 million for the six months ended June 30, 2017 driven by lower margins due to the interest rate environment.

Effective January 1, 2017, the Bancorp elected to prospectively adopt the fair value method for all existing classes of its residential mortgage servicing rights portfolio. Upon this election, all servicing rights are measured at fair value at each reporting date and changes in the fair value of servicing rights are reported in mortgage banking net revenue in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income in the period in which the changes occur.

Prior to the election of the fair value method, servicing rights were initially recorded at fair value and subsequently amortized in proportion to, and over the period of, estimated net servicing revenue. Servicing rights were assessed for impairment monthly, based on fair value, with temporary impairment recognized through a valuation allowance.

Net mortgage servicing revenue decreased $3$9 million and $17$14 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017,2018, respectively, compared to the same periods in the prior year driven by a decrease in originations and lower margins due to the interest rate environment. Residential mortgage loan originations decreased to $2.1 billion and $3.6 billion during the three and six months ended June 30, 2018, respectively, compared to $2.3 billion and $4.2 billion during the same periods in the prior year.

Net mortgage servicing revenue increased $7 million and $15 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2018, respectively, compared to the same periods in the prior year. The decreasesincreases for the three and six months ended June 30, 20172018 compared to the same periods in the prior year were primarily due to decreases in net valuation adjustments (including MSR amortization) of $2 million and $12 million, respectively, and decreasesincluded increases in gross mortgage servicing fees of $1$5 million and $5$9 million, respectively, and decreases in net negative valuation adjustments of $2 million and $6 million, respectively. Refer to Table 1110 for the components of net valuation adjustments on the MSR portfolio and the impact of thenon-qualifying hedging strategy:

TABLE 11:10: Components of Net Valuation Adjustments on MSRs

 

   
  For the three months ended  
June 30,
 
 
  
  For the six months ended  
June 30,
 
 
   For the three months ended  
June 30,
 

  For the six months ended  
June 30,

($ in millions)    2017   2016 2017   2016     2018           2017       2018        2017      

Changes in fair value and settlement of free-standing derivatives purchased to economically hedge the MSR portfolio

 $  16       51      15       149     $  (16)     16    (65)    15   

Changes in fair value:

              

Due to changes in inputs or assumptions

   (17)      -      (13)      -       21      (17)   78     (13)  

Other changes in fair value

   (30)      -      (57)      -      (34)     (30)   (62)    (57)  

Provision for MSR impairment

   -       (45)     -       (131)  

 

Net valuation adjustments on MSR and free-standing derivatives purchased to economically hedge MSRs

 $  (31)      6      (55)      18     $  (29)     (31)   (49)    (55)  

 

Mortgage rates increased during both the three and six months ended June 30, 2018 which caused modeled prepayment speeds to slow. The fair value of the MSR increased $21 million and $78 million, respectively, due to changes to inputs to the valuation model including prepayment speeds and OAS spread assumptions and decreased $34 million and $62 million, respectively, due to the passage of time, including the impact of regularly scheduled repayments, paydowns and payoffs for the three and six months ended June 30, 2018.

Mortgage rates decreased during both the three and six months ended June 30, 2017 which caused modeled prepaymentprepayments speeds to increase, which led to fair value adjustments on servicing rights. The fair value of the MSR decreased $17 million and $13 million, respectively, due to changes to inputs to the valuation model including prepayment speeds and OAS spread assumptions and decreased $30 million and $57 million, respectively, due to the passage of time, including the impact of regularly scheduled repayments, paydowns and payoffs for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017. Mortgage rates also decreased during both the three and six months ended June 30, 2016 which caused modeled prepayment speeds to increase which led to temporary impairment of $45 million and $131 million, respectively, on servicing rights. Previously, servicing rights were deemed temporarily impaired when a borrower’s loan rate was distinctly higher than prevailing rates. Temporary impairment on servicing rights was reversed when the prevailing rates returned to a level commensurate with the borrower’s loan rate.

Further detail on the valuation of MSRs can be found in Note 1110 of the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements. The Bancorp maintains anon-qualifying hedging strategy to manage a portion of the risk associated with changes in the valuation of the MSR portfolio. Refer to Note 1211 of the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for more information on the free-standing derivatives used to economically hedge the MSR portfolio.

In addition to the derivative positions used to economically hedge the MSR portfolio, the Bancorp acquires various securities as a component of itsnon-qualifying hedging strategy. The Bancorp recognized net losses of $4 million and $17 million during the three and six months ended June 30, 2018, respectively, and net gains of $2 million during both the three and six months ended June 30, 2017, recorded in securities (losses) gains, net -non-qualifying hedges on mortgage servicing rightsMSRs in the Bancorp’s Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income.

The Bancorp did not hold any securities as economic hedges on MSRs during the three and six months endedBancorp’s total residential mortgage loans serviced at June 30, 2016.2018 and 2017 were $78.5 billion and $78.0 billion, respectively, with $62.2 billion and $61.8 billion, respectively, of residential mortgage loans serviced for others.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (continued)

 

 

The Bancorp’s total residential loans serviced at June 30, 2017 and 2016 were $78.0 billion and $71.3 billion, respectively, with $61.8 billion and $56.2 billion, respectively, of residential mortgage loans serviced for others.

Other noninterest income

The following table presents the components of other noninterest income:

TABLE 12:11: Components of Other Noninterest Income

        For the three months ended    
June 30,
     For the six months ended    
June 30,
      For the three months ended 
June 30,
   For the six months ended  
June 30,
 
($ in millions)    2017    2016        2017  2016       2018    2017          2018      2017         

Gain related to Vantiv, Inc.’s acquisition of Worldpay Group plc.

 $  -   -          414      -       

Gain on sale of Worldpay, Inc. shares

   205   -          205      -       

Operating lease income

 $  24  25       49     49        22  24          45     49       

Private equity investment income

   16  12          35     26       

Cardholder fees

   13  10       27     21        14  13          27     27       

Private equity investment income

   12  6       26     10     

BOLI income

   13  14       25     27        14  13          27     25       

Equity method income from interest in Vantiv Holding, LLC

   12  18       24     31     

Insurance income

   5  2          11     3       

Consumer loan and lease fees

   6  6       11     11        6  6          11     11       

Banking center income

   5  5       10     10        6  5          11     10       

Insurance income

   2  3       3     6     

Loss on swap associated with the sale of Visa, Inc. class B Shares

   (9 (50)      (22)    (50)    

Net (losses) gains on disposition and impairment of bank premises and equipment

   (1 2       (2)    2     

Net (losses) gains on loan sales

   -  10       (2)    8     

Valuation adjustments on the warrant associated with Vantiv Holding, LLC

   -  19       -     66     

Gains on sales of certain retail branches

   -  11       -     19     

Loss on swap associated with the sale of Visa, Inc. Class B Shares

   (10 (9)         (49)    (22)      

Net losses on disposition and impairment of bank premises and equipment

   (33 (1)         (41)    (2)      

Net losses on loan sales

   -   -          (1)    (2)      

Equity method (loss) income from interest in Vantiv Holding, LLC

   -  12          (1)    24       

Other, net

  8  1       11     5       5  8          14     11       

Total other noninterest income

 $  85  80       160     215      $  250  85          708     160       

Other noninterest income increased $5$165 million during the three months ended June 30, 20172018 compared to the same period in the prior year primarily due to the gain on sale of Worldpay, Inc. shares, partially offset by an increase in the net losses on disposition and impairment of bank premises and equipment and a reduction in the equity method income from the Bancorp’s interest in Vantiv Holding, LLC.

The Bancorp recognized a $205 million gain on the sale of Worldpay, Inc. shares during the three months ended June 30, 2018. For more information, refer to Note 17 of the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements. Net losses on disposition and impairment of bank premises and equipment for the three months ended June 30, 2018 included the impact of branch impairment charges of $33 million. For more information, refer to Note 7 of the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements. Equity method income from the Bancorp’s interest in Vantiv Holding, LLC decreased $12 million for the three months ended June 30, 2018 compared to the same period in the prior year primarily due to a decrease in the negative valuation adjustment on the swap associated with Visa, Inc. Class B SharesBancorp’s ownership percentage in Vantiv Holding, LLC from approximately 17.7% as of June 30, 2017 to approximately 3.3% as of June 30, 2018 and an increase in private equity investment income. These benefits were partially offset by the impact of certain transactions that occurred during the second quarter of 2016 which included a valuation adjustment on the warrant associated withreduction in Vantiv Holding, LLC gains on the sale of certain retail branch operations, and gains on loan sales.

The Bancorp recognized a $9 million negative valuation adjustment related to the Visa total return swapnet income for the three months ended June 30, 20172018 compared to a negative valuation adjustment of $50 million for the three months ended June 30, 2016. The prior year adjustment was primarily attributable to the decision of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit to vacate and reverse the district court’s approval of the settlement of an interchange antitrust class action litigation matter on June 30, 2016. Private equity investment income increased $6 million for the three months ended June 30, 2017 compared to the same period in the prior year primarily due to gains on the sale of certain private equity funds. During the second quarter of 2016, the Bancorp recognized a $19 million positive valuation adjustment on the stock warrant associated with Vantiv Holding, LLC. The stock warrant was not outstanding during 2017 as the Bancorp exercised the remaining warrant in Vantiv Holding, LLC during the fourth quarter of 2016. During the second quarter of 2016, the Bancorp recognized an $11 million gain on the sale of its retail branch operations in the Pittsburgh MSA to First National Bank of Pennsylvania as part of the previously announced Branch Consolidation and Sales Plan. The Bancorp recognized an immaterial amount of net gains on loan sales during the three months ended June 30, 2017 compared to $10 million during the same period in the prior year.

Other noninterest income decreased $55increased $548 million during the six months ended June 30, 20172018 compared to the same period in the prior year primarily due to the impactgain related to Vantiv, Inc’s acquisition of certain transactions that occurredWorldpay Group plc. and the gain on sale of Worldpay, Inc. shares, partially offset by an increase in the net losses on disposition and impairment of bank premises and equipment, an increase in the loss on the swap associated with the sale of Visa, Inc. Class B Shares and a reduction in the equity method income from the Bancorp’s interest in Vantiv Holding, LLC.

The Bancorp recognized a $414 million gain related to Vantiv, Inc.’s acquisition of Worldpay Group plc. during the six months ended June 30, 2016 which included valuation adjustments on2018. For more information, refer to Note 17 of the warrant associated with Vantiv Holding, LLC, gains onNotes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements. The increase for the sales of certain retail branch operations and gains on loan sales. These items were partially offset by a decrease in negative valuation adjustments on the swap associated with Visa, Inc. Class B Shares, and increases in private equity investment income.

The six months ended June 30, 20162018 also included positive valuation adjustmentsthe impact of the previously mentioned $205 million gain on the stock warrant associated with Vantiv Holding, LLCsale of $66Worldpay, Inc. shares. Net losses on disposition and impairment of bank premises and equipment for the six months ended June 30, 2018 included the impact of the previously mentioned branch impairment charges of $33 million. During the six months ended June 30, 2016,2018, the Bancorp recognized $19negative valuation adjustments of $49 million related to the Visa total return swap compared to negative valuation adjustments of gains on the sales of its retail branch operations in the St. Louis MSA to Great Southern Bank and Pittsburgh MSA to First National Bank of Pennsylvania as part of the previously announced Branch Consolidation and Sales Plan. The Bancorp recognized net losses on loan sales of $2$22 million during the six months ended June 30, 2017 compared to $8 million of net gains on loan sales during the same period in2017. The increase from the prior year. As discussed above,period was attributable to litigation developments and an increase in Visa, Inc.’s share price during the six months ended June 30, 2016, the Bancorp recognized $50 million in negative valuation adjustments compared with $22 million for the six months ended June 30, 2017 related to the Visa total return swap. Private equity investment income increased $16 million for the six months ended June 30, 2017 compared to the same period in the prior year primarily due to gains on the sales of certain private equity funds.

2018. For additional information on the valuation of the warrant associated with the sale of Vantiv Holding, LLC and the valuation of the swap associated with the sale of Visa, Inc. Class B Shares and the related Visa litigation matters, refer to Note 16,15, Note 17,16 and Note 21 of the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

Management’s Discussion Equity method earnings from the Bancorp’s interest in Vantiv Holding, LLC decreased $25 million compared to the six months ended June 30, 2017 primarily due to a decrease in the Bancorp’s ownership percentage in Vantiv Holding, LLC and Analysisthe impact of Financial ConditionWorldpay, Inc.’s acquisition and Results of Operations (continued)

integration costs.

Noninterest Expense

Noninterest expense decreased $26increased $80 million for the three months ended June 30, 20172018 compared to the same period in the prior year primarily due to decreasesincreases in personnel costs (salaries, wages and incentives plus employee benefits), net occupancy expense, card and processing expensetechnology and other noninterestcommunications expense. Noninterest expense decreased $25increased $140 million for the six months ended June 30, 20172018 compared to the same period in the prior year primarily due to decreases inincreases personnel costs, technology and communications expense and other noninterest expense, cardexpense.

Management’s Discussion and processing expenseAnalysis of Financial Condition and net occupancy expense, partially offset by an increase in personnel costs.Results of Operations (continued)

The following table presents the components of noninterest expense:

TABLE 13:12: Components of Noninterest Expense

     For the three months ended  
June 30,
        For the six months ended  
June 30,
        For the three months ended  
June 30,
        For the six months ended  
June 30,
   
($ in millions)    2017 2016 % Change    2017 2016 % Change     2018 2017    % Change   2018 2017   % Change

Salaries, wages and incentives

 

$

   397  407  (2)     $   808  810  -      $   471  397   19      $   918  808   14     

Employee benefits

    86  85  1         196  185  6         78  86   (9)        188  196   (4)    

Net occupancy expense

    70  75  (7)        148  152  (3)        74  70   6         149  148   1     

Technology and communications

    57  60  (5)        116  116  -         67  57   18         135  116   16     

Equipment expense

    30  29   3         61  57   7     

Card and processing expense

    33  37  (11)        63  72  (13)        30  33   (9)        60  63   (5)    

Equipment expense

    29  30  (3)        57  60  (5)    

Other noninterest expense

     285  289  (1)        555  573  (3)        287  285   1         572  555   3     

Total noninterest expense

 

$

   957  983  (3)     $   1,943  1,968  (1)     $   1,037  957   8      $   2,083  1,943   7     

Efficiency ratio on an FTE basis(a)

     63.4 65.3     65.4 64.5      58.7 63.4       56.7 65.4    
(a)

This is anon-GAAP measure. For further information, refer to theNon-GAAP Financial Measures section of MD&A.

Personnel costs decreased $9 million for the three months ended June 30, 2017, compared to the same period in the prior year. The decrease was primarily driven by a decrease in long-term incentive compensation as a result of the Bancorp issuingnon-executive grants in the first quarter of 2017 where they have historically been issued in the second quarter. Personnel costs increased $9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2017, compared to the same period in the prior year. The increase was driven by increases in variable compensation and long-term incentive compensation, partially offset by a decrease in severance costs related to the voluntary early retirement program in 2016. Full-time equivalent employees totaled 17,744 at June 30, 2017 compared to 18,051 at June 30, 2016.

Net occupancy expense decreased $5$66 million and $4$102 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017,2018, respectively, compared to the same periods in the prior year driven by an increase in base compensation, variable compensation, long-term incentive compensation and severance costs. The increase in base compensation was primarily due to lower rent expense driven by a reductionpersonnel additions in information technology as well as an increase in the numberBancorp’s minimum wage as a result of full-service banking centersbenefits received from the TCJA. Full-time equivalent employees totaled 18,163 at June 30, 2018 compared to 17,744 at June 30, 2017.

Technology and ATM locations.

Card and processingcommunications expense decreased $4increased $10 million and $9$19 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017,2018, respectively, compared to the same periods in the prior year driven primarily due to the impact of renegotiated service contracts.by increased investment in regulatory, compliance and growth initiatives.

The following table presents the components of other noninterest expense:

TABLE 14:13: Components of Other Noninterest Expense

     For the three months ended    
June 30,
  

    For the six months ended    

June 30,

 For the three months ended
June 30,
      For the six months ended    
June 30,
($ in millions)    2017         2016  2017  2016    2018         2017       2018 2017    

Impairment on affordable housing investments

 

$

  38       43  77  85   

$

  47     38       95  77    

FDIC insurance and other taxes

   32       28  65  62     34     32       66  65    

Marketing

   30       26  49  51     30     30       62  49    

Loan and lease

   24       28  46  51     29     24       55  46    

Operating lease

   21       21  46  41     20     21       40  46    

Losses and adjustments

   16     11       33  26    

Professional service fees

   22       15  44  30     16     22       30  44    

Data processing

   15       12  28  24     15     15       28  28    

Losses and adjustments

   11       20  26  43  

Travel

   12       11  23  23     13     12       26  23    

Postal and courier

   11       12  23  23     8     11       18  23    

Donations

   13     3       16  6    

Recruitment and education

   9       9  17  18     8     9       16  17    

Supplies

   4       4  7  7     4     4       7  7    

Insurance

   3       4  6  8     3     3       6  6    

Donations

   3       3  6  6  

Provision for the reserve for unfunded commitments

   3       7  1  13  

(Benefit from) provision for the reserve for unfunded commitments

   (20)    3       (30 1    

Other, net

   47       46  91  88      51     47       104  91    

Total other noninterest expense

 

$

  285       289  555  573   

$

  287     285               572  555    

Other noninterest expense decreased $4increased $2 million for the three months ended June 30, 20172018 compared to the same period in the prior year primarily due to decreasesincreases in lossesdonations expense and adjustments, impairment on affordable housing investments, andpartially offset by an increase in the provision forbenefit from the reserve for unfunded commitments, partially offset by increases in professional service fees, marketingcommitments. Donations expense and FDIC insurance and other taxes. Losses and adjustments decreased $9increased $10 million for the three months ended June 30, 2017 compared to the same period in the prior year primarily due to the impact of legal reserves established during the second quarter of 2016 and favorable legal settlements during the three months ended June 30, 2017. Impairment on affordable housing investments decreased $5 million for the three months ended June 30, 20172018 compared to the same period in the prior year primarily due to a decreasecontribution to the Fifth Third Foundation. Impairment on affordable housing investments increased $9 million for the three months ended June 30, 2018 compared to the same period in the numberprior year primarily driven by the change in the federal statutory corporate tax rate pursuant to the TCJA. The benefit from the reserve for unfunded commitments was $20 million for the three months ended June 30, 2018 compared to a provision for the reserve for unfunded commitments of investments.$3 million for the same period in the prior year as a result of overall improved credit quality.

Other noninterest expense increased $17 million for the six months ended June 30, 2018 compared to the same period in the prior year primarily due to increases in the impairment on affordable housing investments, marketing expense and donations expense, partially offset by an increase in the benefit for the reserve for unfunded commitments. Impairment on affordable housing investments increased $18 million for the six months ended June 30, 2018 compared to the same period in the prior year primarily driven by the change in the federal statutory corporate tax rate pursuant to the TCJA. Marketing expense increased $13 million for the six months ended June 30, 2018 compared to the same period in the prior year primarily due to promotional offers during the six months ended June 30, 2018. Donations expense increased $10 million for the six months ended June 30, 2018 compared to the same period in the prior year primarily due to a contribution to the Fifth Third Foundation. The benefit from the reserve for unfunded commitments was $30 million for the six months ended June 30, 2018 compared to a provision for the reserve for unfunded commitments of $1 million for the same period in the prior year as a result of overall improved credit quality.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (continued)

 

 

The provision for the reserve for unfunded commitments decreased $4 million for the three months ended June 30, 2017 compared to the same period in the prior year primarily due to a decrease in total unfunded commitments outstanding. Professional service fees increased $7 million for the three months ended June 30, 2017 compared to the same period in the prior year primarily due to investments in the NorthStar strategy and other strategic initiatives. Marketing expense increased $4 million for the three months ended June 30, 2017 compared to the same period in the prior year primarily due to the new brand campaign. FDIC insurance and other taxes increased $4 million for the three months ended June 30, 2017 compared to the three months ended June 30, 2016 primarily due to the implementation of the FDIC surcharge in the third quarter of 2016.

Other noninterest expense decreased $18 million for the six months ended June 30, 2017 compared to the same period in the prior year primarily due to decreases in losses and adjustments, the provision for the reserve for unfunded commitments and impairment on affordable housing investments, partially offset by an increase in professional service fees. Losses and adjustments decreased $17 million for the six months ended June 30, 2017 compared to the same period in the prior year primarily due to the impact of legal reserves established during the six months ended June 30, 2016 and the impact of favorable legal settlements during the six months ended June 30, 2017. The provision for the reserve for unfunded commitments decreased $12 million for the six months ended June 30, 2017 compared to the same period in the prior year primarily due to a decrease in total unfunded commitments outstanding. Impairment on affordable housing investments decreased $8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2017 compared to the same period in the prior year primarily due to a decrease in the number of investments. Professional service fees increased $14 million for the six months ended June 30, 2017 compared to the same period in the prior year primarily due to investments in the NorthStar strategy and other strategic initiatives.

Applicable Income Taxes

The following table presents the Bancorp’s income before income taxes, applicable income tax expense and effective tax rate:    

TABLE 15:14: Applicable Income Taxes

     

  For the three months ended  
June 30,

  

  For the six months ended  
June 30,

($ in millions)     2017  2016(a)    2017  2016(a)

Income before income taxes

 

$

  494       427       890  862    

Applicable income tax expense

   127       103       218  212    

Effective tax rate

    25.9%  23.9       24.5  24.5    
(a)

Net tax deficiencies of $5 and $6 were reclassified from capital surplus to applicable income tax expense for the three and six months ended June 30, 2016, respectively, related to the early adoption of ASU2016-09 during the fourth quarter of 2016, with an effective date of January 1, 2016.

       

  For the three months ended  
June 30,

  

   For the six months ended  
June 30,

($ in millions)    2018  2017   2018  2017

 

  

 

Income before income taxes

 

$

  693      494       1,529    890     

Applicable income tax expense

   107      127       239    218     

Effective tax rate

    15.5%  25.9       15.7    24.5     

Applicable income tax expense for all periods includes the benefit fromtax-exempt income,tax-advantaged investments, certain gains on sales of leveraged leases that are exempt from federal taxation and tax credits, partially offset by the effect of certain nondeductible expenses. The tax credits are associated with theLow-Income Housing Tax Credit program established under Section 42 of the IRC, the New Markets Tax Credit program established under Section 45D of the IRC, the Rehabilitation Investment Tax Credit program established under Section 47 of the IRC, and the Qualified Zone Academy Bond program established under Section 1397E of the IRC.

The increasedecreases in the effective tax raterates for the three and six months ended June 30, 20172018 compared to the same periodperiods in the prior year iswere primarily related to the result of a tax benefit that was recordedreduction in the second quarterfederal statutory corporate tax rate partially offset by changes to previously deductible items associated with the enactment of 2016 related to a change in the estimated deductibility of a prior expense.TCJA.

For stock-based awards, U.S. GAAP requires that the tax consequences for the difference between the expense recognized for financial reporting and the Bancorp’s actual tax deduction for the stock-based awards be recognized through income tax expense in the interim periods in which they occur. In 2017, the Bancorp transitioned to granting itsnon-executive stock based compensation awards in the first quarter of the calendar year rather than the second quarter as it had done in previous years. In light of this change to the timing of these annual grants, the Bancorp expects to recognize the excess tax benefits or deficiencies associated with its restricted stock awards primarily in the first and second quarters of 2018, 2019, 2020 and in the first quarter of 2021 as these annual awards vest.

The Bancorp cannot predict its stock price or whether and when its employees will exercise stock-based awards in the future. Based on its stock price at June 30, 2017,2018, the Bancorp estimates that it may be necessary to recognize $12$15 million of additional income tax benefit over the next twelve months related to the settlement of stock-based awards primarily in the first half of 2018.2019. However, the amount of income tax expense or benefit recognized upon settlement may vary significantly from expectations based on the Bancorp’s stock price and the number of SARs exercised by employees.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (continued)

 

 

BALANCE SHEET ANALYSIS

Loans and Leases

The Bancorp classifies its commercial loans and leases based upon primary purpose and consumer loans and leases based upon product or collateral. Table 1615 summarizes end of period loans and leases, including loans and leases held for sale and Table 1716 summarizes average total loans and leases, including loans and leases held for sale.

TABLE 16:15: Components of Total Loans and Leases (including loans and leases held for sale)

     June 30, 2017  December 31, 2016     June 30, 2018  December 31, 2017
As of ($ in millions)   Carrying Value   % of Total    Carrying Value   % of Total       Carrying Value % of Total    Carrying Value % of Total  

Commercial loans and leases:

               

Commercial and industrial loans

 

$

   40,923    

44

  $41,736     46  

$

  41,447  

45

      $41,170  

45

Commercial mortgage loans

    6,876    

7

   6,904     7    6,697  

7

   6,610  

7

Commercial construction loans

    4,366    

5

   3,903     4    4,687  

5

   4,553  

5

Commercial leases

     4,157    5   3,974     4     3,797  4   4,068  4

Total commercial loans and leases

 

$

   56,322    61  $56,517     61     56,628  61   56,401  61

Consumer loans and leases:

         

Consumer loans:

      

Residential mortgage loans

    16,209    18   15,737     17    16,298  18   16,077  17

Home equity

    7,301    8   7,695     8    6,599  7   7,014  8

Automobile loans

    9,318    10   9,983     11    8,938  10   9,112  10

Credit card

    2,117    2   2,237     2    2,270  2   2,299  2

Other consumer loans and leases

    945    1   680     1 

Total consumer loans and leases

 

$

   35,890    39  $              36,332     39 

Other consumer loans

  1,982  2   1,559  2

Total consumer loans

    36,087  39   36,061  39

Total loans and leases

 

$

   92,212    100  $              92,849     100  

$

  92,715  100      $92,462  100

Total portfolio loans and leases (excluding loans held for sale)

 

$

   91,446       $              92,098     

Total portfolio loans and leases (excluding loans and leases held for sale)

 

$

  91,932        $              91,970  

Loans and leases, including loans and leases held for sale, decreased $637increased $253 million from December 31, 2017. The increase from December 31, 2017 was the result of a $227 million increase in commercial loans and leases as well as a $26 million increase in consumer loans.

Commercial loans and leases increased from December 31, 2017 due to increases in commercial and industrial loans, commercial construction loans and commercial mortgage loans, partially offset by a decrease in commercial leases. Commercial and industrial loans increased $277 million, or 1%, from December 31, 2016. The2017 primarily as a result of an increase in new loan originations as well as a decrease in payoffs during the six months ended June 30, 2018. Commercial construction loans increased $134 million, or 3%, from December 31, 2016 was the result of a $4422017 primarily due to increases in demand and draw levels on existing commitments. Commercial mortgage loans increased $87 million, or 1%, decrease in consumer loans and leases and a $195 million decrease in commercial loans and leases.

Consumer loans and leases decreased from December 31, 20162017 primarily due to decreases in automobile loans, home equity and credit card, partially offset by an increase in residential mortgage loans. Automobile loanspermanent financing from the Bancorp’s commercial construction loan portfolio. Commercial leases decreased $665$271 million, or 7%, from December 31, 20162017 primarily as a result of a planned reduction in indirectnon-relationship based lease originations.

Consumer loans increased from December 31, 2017 due to increases in other consumer loans and residential mortgage loans, partially offset by decreases in home equity, automobile loans and credit card. Other consumer loans increased $423 million, or 27%, from December 31, 2017 primarily due to growth inpoint-of-sale loan originations. Residential mortgage loans increased $221 million, or 1%, from December 31, 2017 primarily due to the continued retention of certain agency conforming ARMs and certain other fixed-rate loans originated during the six months ended June 30, 2018. Home equity decreased $415 million, or 6%, from December 31, 2017 as payoffs exceeded new loan production. Automobile loans decreased $174 million, or 2%, from December 31, 2017 as payoffs exceeded new loan production due to a strategic shift focusing on improving risk-adjusted returns. Home equityCredit card decreased $394$29 million, or 5%1%, from December 31, 2016 as payoffs exceeded new loan production. Credit card decreased $120 million, or 5%, from December 31, 20162017 primarily due to seasonal trends from the paydown ofyear-end balances which were higher due to holiday spending. Residential mortgage loans increased $472 million, or 3%, from December 31, 2016 primarily due to the continued retention of certain conforming ARMs and certain other fixed-rate loans originated during the six months ended June 30, 2017.

Commercial loans and leases decreased from December 31, 2016 primarily due to a decrease in commercial and industrial loans, partially offset by an increase in commercial construction loans and commercial leases. Commercial and industrial loans decreased $813 million, or 2%, from December 31, 2016 primarily as a result of deliberate exits from certain loans that did not meet the Bancorp’s risk-adjusted profitability targets and softer loan demand. Commercial construction loans increased $463 million, or 12%, from December 31, 2016 primarily as a result of draw levels outpacing attrition. Commercial leases increased $183 million, or 5%, from December 31, 2016 primarily as a result of an increase in origination activity.

TABLE 17:16: Components of Average Loans and Leases (including loans and leases held for sale)

       June 30, 2017  June 30, 2016 
For the three months ended ($ in millions)     Carrying Value   % of Total    Carrying Value   % of Total   

Commercial loans and leases:

         

Commercial and industrial loans

 $   41,656    45  $43,878     46   

Commercial mortgage loans

    6,861    7   6,835     7   

Commercial construction loans

    4,306    5   3,551     4   

Commercial leases

     4,039    4   3,904     4   

Total commercial loans and leases

 $   56,862    61  $58,168     61   

Consumer loans and leases:

         

Residential mortgage loans

    16,024    18   14,842     16   

Home equity

    7,385    8   8,059     9   

Automobile loans

    9,410    10   10,887     11   

Credit card

    2,080    2   2,198     2   

Other consumer loans and leases

     892    1   653     1   

Total consumer loans and leases

 $   35,791    39  $                36,639     39   

Total average loans and leases

 $   92,653    100  $94,807     100   

Total average portfolio loans and leases (excluding loans held for sale)

 $   91,972       $93,931       

Average loans and leases, including loans held for sale, decreased $2.2 billion, or 2%, from June 30, 2016. The decrease from June 30, 2016 was the result of a $1.3 billion, or 2%, decrease in average commercial loans and leases and an $848 million, or 2%, decrease in average consumer loans and leases.
       June 30, 2018     June 30, 2017
For the three months ended ($ in millions)     Carrying Value  % of Total      Carrying Value  % of Total 

Commercial loans and leases:

        

Commercial and industrial loans

 $   42,327  45       $   41,656  45 

Commercial mortgage loans

    6,521  7    6,861  

Commercial construction loans

    4,743  5    4,306  

Commercial leases

     3,847  4     4,039  

Total commercial loans and leases

     57,438  61     56,862  61 

Consumer loans:

        

Residential mortgage loans

    16,213  18    16,024  18 

Home equity

    6,672  7    7,385  

Automobile loans

    8,968  10    9,410  10 

Credit card

    2,221  2    2,080  

Other consumer loans

     1,720  2     892  

Total consumer loans

     35,794  39     35,791  39 

Total average loans and leases

 $   93,232  100 $   92,653  100 

Total average portfolio loans and leases (excluding loans and leases held for sale)

 $   92,557    $               91,972   

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (continued)

 

Average loans and leases, including loans and leases held for sale, increased $579 million from June 30, 2017. The increase from June 30, 2017 was the result of a $576 million, or 1%, increase in average commercial loans and leases as well as a $3 million increase in average consumer loans.

Average commercial loans and leases decreasedincreased from June 30, 2016 primarily2017 due to an increase in average commercial and industrial and commercial construction loans, partially offset by a decrease in average commercial mortgage loans and industrial loans, partially offset by an increase in average commercial construction loans.leases. Average commercial and industrial loans decreased $2.2 billion,increased $671 million, or 5%2%, from June 30, 2016 primarily as a result of deliberate exits from certain loans that did not meet the Bancorp’s risk-adjusted profitability targets and softer loan demand. Average commercial construction loans increased $755 million, or 21%, from June 30, 20162017 primarily as a result of an increase in new loan origination as well as a decrease in payoffs. Average commercial construction loans increased $437 million, or 10%, from June 30, 2017 primarily due to increases in demand and draw levels on existing commitments. Average commercial mortgage loans decreased $340 million, or 5%, from June 30, 2017 primarily due to a decline in new loan origination activity resulting fromdriven by increased competition and an increase in demand.paydowns. Average commercial leases decreased $192 million, or 5%, from June 30, 2017 primarily as a result of a planned reduction in indirectnon-relationship based lease originations.

Average consumer loans and leases decreasedincreased from June 30, 20162017 primarily due to increases in average other consumer loans and average residential mortgage loans, partially offset by decreases in average automobile loanshome equity and average automobile loans. Average other consumer loans increased $828 million, or 93%, June 30, 2017 primarily due to growth inpoint-of-sale loan originations. Average residential mortgage loans increased $189 million, or 1%, from June 30, 2017 primarily driven by the continued retention of certain agency conforming ARMs and certain other fixed-rate loans. Average home equity partially offset by an increase in average residential mortgage loans.decreased $713 million, or 10%, from June 30, 2017 as payoffs exceeded new loan production. Average automobile loans decreased $1.5 billion,$442 million, or 14%5%, from June 30, 20162017 as payoffs exceeded new loan production due to a strategic shift focusing on improving risk-adjusted returns. Average home equity decreased $674 million, or 8%, from June 30, 2016 as payoffs exceeded new loan production. Average residential mortgage loans increased $1.2 billion, or 8%, from June 30, 2016 primarily driven by the continued retention of certain conforming ARMs and certain other fixed-rate loans.

Investment Securities

The Bancorp uses investment securities as a means of managing interest rate risk, providing both liquidity support and collateral for pledging purposes.purposes and liquidity for satisfying regulatory requirements. Total investment securities were $32.7 billion and $31.6 billion at both June 30, 20172018 and December 31, 2016, respectively.2017. The taxableavailable-for-sale investment securities portfolio had an effective duration of 4.95.2 years at June 30, 20172018 compared to 5.04.7 years at December 31, 2016.2017.

SecuritiesDebt securities are classified asavailable-for-sale when, in management’s judgment, they may be sold in response to, or in anticipation of, changes in market conditions. Securities that management has the intent and ability to hold to maturity are classified asheld-to-maturity and reported at amortized cost. SecuritiesDebt securities are classified as trading when bought and held principally for the purpose of selling them in the near term. At June 30, 2017,2018, the Bancorp’s investment portfolio consisted primarily ofAAA-ratedavailable-for-sale debt securities. Securities classified asThe Bancorp held $8 million in below investment grade weresecurities at June 30, 2018 and an immaterial at bothamount as of December 31, 2017. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2018 the Bancorp did not recognize OTTI on any of itsavailable-for-sale debt and other securities. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2017 the Bancorp recognized $14 million and December 31, 2016. The Bancorp’s management has evaluated the$24 million, respectively, of OTTI on itsavailable-for-sale debt and other securities, included in an unrealized loss positionsecurities (losses) gains, net, in theavailable-for-sale andheld-to-maturity portfolios for OTTI.

The following table provides a summary Condensed Consolidated Statements of OTTI by security type:Income.

TABLE 18: Components of OTTI by Security Type

          For the three months ended
June 30,
    

For the six months ended       

June 30,

($ in millions)    2017    2016      2017           2016      

Available-for-sale and other debt securities

 $ (14) (3)  (24)           (4)    

Available-for-sale equity securities

   -   -     -             (1)    

Total OTTI(a)

 $ (14) (3)   (24)           (5)    
(a)

Included in securities gains, net, in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income.

The following table summarizes the end of period components of investment securities:

TABLE 19:17: Components of Investment Securities

As of ($ in millions)       June 30,    
      2017
     
 December 31,      
2016      
         June 30,    
      2018     
   December 31,      
2017      
 

Available-for-sale and other securities (amortized cost basis):

  

Available-for-sale debt and other securities (amortized cost basis):

    

U.S. Treasury and federal agencies securities

 $69           547                $98             98              

Obligations of states and political subdivisions securities

  43           44                 34             43              

Mortgage-backed securities:

      

Agency residential mortgage-backed securities(a)

  16,009           15,525                 16,405             15,281              

Agency commercial mortgage-backed securities

  9,165           9,029                 10,308             10,113              

Non-agency commercial mortgage-backed securities

  3,315��          3,076                 3,149             3,247              

Asset-backed securities and other debt securities

  2,192           2,106                 1,981             2,183              

Equity securities(b)

 699           697              

Totalavailable-for-sale and other securities

 $        31,492           31,024              

Other securities(b)

   614             612              

Totalavailable-for-sale debt and other securities

  $        32,589             31,577              

Held-to-maturity securities (amortized cost basis):

      

Obligations of states and political subdivisions securities

 $24           24                $17             22              

Asset-backed securities and other debt securities

 2           2                 2             2              

Totalheld-to-maturity securities

 $26           26                $19             24              

Trading securities (fair value):

  

Trading debt securities (fair value):

    

U.S. Treasury and federal agencies securities

 $20           23                $19             12              

Obligations of states and political subdivisions securities

  27           39                 58             22              

Agency residential mortgage-backed securities

  413           8                 75             395              

Asset-backed securities and other debt securities

  30           15                 128             63              

Equity securities

 352           325              

Total trading securities

 $842           410              

Total trading debt securities

  $280             492              

Total equity securities

  $475             439              
(a)

Includes interest-only mortgage-backed securities of$39 and $60 $34 as ofJune 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively,2017 recorded at fair value with fair value changes recorded in securities gains, net in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income.

(b)

EquityOther securities consist of FHLB, FRB and DTCC restricted stock holdings of$248,$360364 and$2, respectively, atJune 30, 20172018 and $248, $358,$362, and $1,$2, respectively, at December 31, 2016,2017, that are carried at cost, and certain mutual fund and equity security holdings.cost.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (continued)

 

 

On an amortized cost basis,available-for-sale debt and other securities increased $468 million, or 2%,$1.0 billion from December 31, 20162017 primarily due to increases in agency residential mortgage-backed securities,non-agency commercial mortgage-backed securities and agency commercial mortgage-backed securities, partially offset by a decrease in U.S. Treasuryasset-backed securities and federal agenciesother debt securities.

On an amortized cost basis,available-for-sale debt and other securities were 26% and 25% of total interest-earning assets at June 30, 2017 compared to 24% at2018 and December 31, 2016.2017, respectively. The estimated weighted-average life of the debt securities in theavailable-for-sale debt and other securities portfolio was 6.66.7 years at June 30, 20172018 compared to 6.76.5 years at December 31, 2016.2017. In addition, at June 30, 2017,2018, the debt securities in theavailable-for-sale debt and other securities portfolio had a weighted-average yield of 3.11%3.22%, compared to 3.19%3.18% at December 31, 2016.2017.

Trading debt securities increased $432decreased $212 million from December 31, 20162017 primarily due to an increasea decrease in agency residential mortgage-backed securities purchased as part of the Bancorp’snon-qualifying hedging strategy to economically hedge a portion of the risk associated with the MSR portfolio.securities.

Information presented in Table 2018 is on a weighted-average life basis, anticipating future prepayments. Yield information is presented on an FTE basis and is computed using amortized cost balances. Maturity and yield calculations for the totalavailable-for-sale debt and other securities portfolio exclude equityother securities that have no stated yield or maturity. Total net unrealized gainslosses on theavailable-for-sale debt and other securities portfolio were $331$628 million at June 30, 20172018 compared to $159net unrealized gains of $174 million at December 31, 2016.2017. The fair value of investment securities is impacted by interest rates, credit spreads, market volatility and liquidity conditions. The fair value of investment securities generally increasesdecreases when interest rates decreaseincrease or when credit spreads contract.expand.

TABLE 20:18: Characteristics ofAvailable-for-Sale Debt and Other Securities

As of June 30, 2017 ($ in millions)    Amortized Cost Fair Value Weighted-Average
Life (in years)
 Weighted-Average    
Yield    
 
As of June 30, 2018 ($ in millions)     Amortized Cost   Fair Value   Weighted-Average
Life (in years)
   Weighted-Average    
Yield    
 

U.S. Treasury and federal agencies securities:

            

Average life of 1 year or less

 $-            -        0.6           2.24 %           $-             -          -             3.65 %         

Average life 1 – 5 years

 69           69        4.0           1.85                98             96          4.6             2.16             

Total

 $69           69        4.0           1.85 %           $98             96          4.6             2.16 %         

Obligations of states and political subdivisions securities:(a)

            

Average life of 1 year or less

 9           9        0.8           0.02                27             28          0.8             3.91             

Average life 1 – 5 years

 13           14        4.8           4.26                5             5          1.0             3.77             

Average life 5 – 10 years

 21           22        6.4           3.74                2             2          6.2             -             

Total

 $43           45        4.7           3.13 %           $34             35          1.1             3.69 %         

Agency residential mortgage-backed securities:

            

Average life of 1 year or less

 54           56        0.7           3.90                1             1          0.2             4.43             

Average life 1 – 5 years

 4,023           4,084        4.0           3.32                5,869             5,799          4.3             3.43             

Average life 5 – 10 years

 11,158           11,249        6.8        ��  3.11                9,490             9,290          7.3             3.18             

Average life greater than 10 years

 774           788        11.6           3.15                1,045             1,004          11.0             3.09             

Total

 $16,009           16,177        6.3           3.17 %           $16,405             16,094          6.5             3.26 %         

Agency commercial mortgage-backed securities:

            

Average life of 1 year or less

 16           16        0.7           2.88                197             189          0.9             2.56             

Average life 1 – 5 years

 2,711           2,714        3.6           2.79                2,443             2,395          3.4             3.12             

Average life 5 – 10 years

 6,156           6,252        7.3           3.03                5,299             5,177          7.8             3.06             

Average life greater than 10 years

 282           280        13.0           2.96                2,369             2,277          11.6             3.12             

Total

 $9,165           9,262        6.4           2.96 %           $10,308             10,038          7.5             3.08 %         

Non-agency commercial mortgage-backed securities:

            

Average life of 1 year or less

 46           46        0.6           3.51                -             -          0.4             4.53             

Average life 1 – 5 years

 122           125        2.5           3.37                338             334          4.5             3.25             

Average life 5 – 10 years

 3,147           3,193        7.4           3.24                2,811             2,752          6.7             3.26             

Total

 $3,315           3,364        7.1           3.25 %           $3,149             3,086          6.5             3.26 %         

Asset-backed securities and other debt securities:

            

Average life of 1 year or less

 18           18        0.3           3.80                31             31          0.5             3.38             

Average life 1 – 5 years

 533           538        3.1           3.44                839             838          3.6             3.93             

Average life 5 – 10 years

 321           325        7.6           3.01                914             930          6.6             3.46             

Average life greater than 10 years

 1,320           1,325        15.4           3.08                197             199          10.5             3.41             

Total

 $2,192           2,206        11.2           3.17 %           $1,981             1,998          5.6             3.65 %         

Equity securities

 699           700        

Totalavailable-for-sale and other securities

 $31,492           31,823        6.6           3.11 %         

Other securities

   614             614             

Totalavailable-for-sale debt and other securities

  $32,589             31,961          6.7             3.22 %         
(a)

Taxable-equivalent yield adjustments included in the above table are 0.00%1.04%, 2.29%0.98%, 2.04%0.00% and 1.69%0.98% for securities with an average life of 1 year or less,1-5 years,5-10 years and in total, respectively.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (continued)

 

 

Deposits

The Bancorp’s deposit balances represent an important source of funding and revenue growth opportunity. The Bancorp continues to focus on core deposit growth in its retail and commercial franchises by improving customer satisfaction, building full relationships and offering competitive rates. CoreAverage core deposits represented 70%72% and 71% of the Bancorp’s average asset funding base at June 30, 20172018 and December 31, 2016,2017, respectively.

The following table presents the end of period components of deposits:

TABLE 21:19: Components of Deposits

    June 30, 2017   December 31, 2016     June 30, 2018   December 31, 2017 
As of ($ in millions)    Balance   % of Total   Balance   % of Total     Balance   % of Total   Balance   % of Total 

Demand

 $  34,965    34       $35,782    34      $  32,680    32       $35,276    34    

Interest checking

   25,436    25        26,679    26        29,452    28        27,703    27    

Savings

   14,068    14        13,941    13        13,455    13        13,425    13    

Money market

   20,191    20        20,749    20        21,593    21        20,097    19    

Foreign office

    395    -        426    1         336    -        484    1    

Transaction deposits

   95,055    93        97,577    94        97,516    94        96,985    94    

Other time

    3,692    4        3,866    4         4,058    4        3,775    4    

Core deposits

   98,747    97        101,443    98        101,574    98        100,760    98    

Certificates $100,000 and over(a)

   2,633    3        2,378    2         2,557    2        2,402    2    

Other

    500    -        -    -     

Total deposits

 $  101,880    100       $    103,821    100      $  104,131    100       $    103,162    100    
(a)

Includes$1,2041.4 billionand $1,280$1.3 billion of institutional, retail and wholesale certificates $250,000 and over atJune 30, 20172018and December 31, 2016,2017, respectively.

Core deposits decreased $2.7 billion,increased $814 million, or 3%1%, from December 31, 20162017 primarily driven by a decreasean increase of $2.5 billion$531 million in transaction deposits. Transaction deposits decreasedincreased from December 31, 20162017 primarily due to decreasesincreases in interest checking deposits demand deposits and money market deposits, partially offset by a decrease in demand deposits. Interest checking deposits and demand deposits decreased $1.2increased $1.7 billion, or 5%, and $817 million, or 2%, respectively, from December 31, 2016 driven primarily by lower balances per account for commercial customers. Money market deposits decreased $558 million, or 3%6%, from December 31, 20162017 driven primarily by lowerbalance migration from demand deposit accounts and higher balances per account for commercial customers partially offsetcustomer account. Money market deposits increased $1.5 billion, or 7%, from December 31, 2017 primarily as a result of promotional rate offers facilitated by a promotional product offeringthe rising-rate environment which drove consumer customer acquisition.

Other Demand deposits increased $500 milliondecreased $2.6 billion, or 7%, from December 31, 20162017 primarily as a result of the aforementioned commercial customer balance migration into interest checking deposits and lower balances per commercial customer account due to an increase in Eurodollar trade deposits. Certificates $100,000 and over increased $255 million, or 11%, primarily due to the issuance of institutional certificates of deposit since December 31, 2016.commercial customer seasonality.

The following table presents the components of average deposits for the three months ended:

TABLE 22:20: Components of Average Deposits

    June 30, 2017      June 30, 2016        June 30, 2018      June 30, 2017    
($ in millions)    Balance   % of Total   Balance   % of Total      Balance   % of Total   Balance   % of Total 

Demand

 $   34,915    34       $35,912    35       $  32,834    32       $34,915    34    

Interest checking

   26,014    25        24,714    24         28,715    28        26,014    25    

Savings

   14,238    14        14,576    14         13,618    13        14,238    14    

Money market

   20,278    20        19,243    19         22,036    21        20,278    20    

Foreign office

  380    -        484    1        371    -        380    -    

Transaction deposits

   95,825    93        94,929    93         97,574    94        95,825    93    

Other time

  3,745    4        4,044    4        4,018    4        3,745    4    

Core deposits

   99,570    97        98,973    97         101,592    98        99,570    97    

Certificates $100,000 and over(a)

   2,623    3        2,819    3         2,155    2        2,623    3    

Other

  264    -        467    -        198    -        264    -    

Total average deposits

 $   102,457    100       $    102,259    100       $  103,945    100       $    102,457    100    
(a)

Includes$1,2261.1 billionand $1,302$1.3 billion of average institutional, retail and wholesale certificates $250,000 and over for the three months endedJune 30, 20172018and 2016,2017, respectively.

On an average basis, core deposits increased $597 million, or 1%,$2.0 billion from June 30, 20162017 primarily due to an increase of $896 million$1.7 billion in average transaction deposits. The increase in average transaction deposits was driven by increases in average interest checking deposits and average money market deposits, partially offset by decreases in average demand deposits and average savings deposits. Average interest checking deposits increased $1.3$2.7 billion, or 5%10%, from June 30, 2016,2017, primarily due to higherbalance migration from demand deposit accounts and an increase in average customer balances per commercial customer account. Average money market deposits increased $1.0$1.8 billion, or 5%9%, from June 30, 2016,2017 primarily due toas a result of promotional product offeringrate offers facilitated by the rising-rate environment which drove consumer customer acquisition and balance migration from savings deposits, which decreased $338 million, or 2%, compared to June 30, 2016.acquisition. Average demand deposits decreased $997 million,$2.1 billion, or 3%6%, from June 30, 20162017 primarily due to lowercommercial customer balance migration into interest checking deposits and a decrease in average balances per commercial customer and institutional accounts. The increase in average core deposits from June 30, 2016 included the impact of the sale of $292 million of deposits as part of the branches sold in the Pittsburgh MSA during the three months ended June 30, 2016.account.

Average other deposits decreased $203 million, or 43%, from June 30, 2016 due to a decrease in average Eurodollar trade deposits. Average certificates $100,000 and over decreased $196$468 million or 7%, from June 30, 20162017 primarily due to the maturity andrun-off of institutionalcommercial certificates of deposit since June 30, 2016.2017.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (continued)

 

 

Contractual maturities

The contractual maturities of certificates $100,000 and over as of June 30, 20172018 are summarized in the following table:

TABLE 23:21: Contractual Maturities of Certificates $100,000 and Over

 

 

($ in millions)

  

 

 

Next 3 months

  $583411  

3-6 months

   181328  

6-12 months

   662950  

After 12 months

   1,207868  

Total certificates $100,000 and over

  $        2,6332,557  

The contractual maturities of other time deposits and certificates $100,000 and over as of June 30, 20172018 are summarized in the following table:

TABLE 24:22: Contractual Maturities of Other Time Deposits and Certificates $100,000 and Over

 

 

($ in millions)

  

 

 

Next 12 months

  $2,7773,575  

13-24 months

   1,1592,115  

25-36 months

   1,761731  

37-48 months

   531163  

49-60 months

   8523  

After 60 months

   128  

Total other time deposits and certificates $100,000 and over

  $        6,3256,615  

Borrowings

The Bancorp accesses a variety of other short-term and long-term funding sources. Borrowings with original maturities of one year or less are classified as short-term and include federal funds purchased and other short-term borrowings. As of June 30, 2017,2018, average total borrowings as a percent of average interest-bearing liabilities were 22%20% compared to 21% at December 31, 2016.2017.

The following table summarizes the end of period components of borrowings:

TABLE 25:23: Components of Borrowings

As of ($ in millions)  June 30, 2017   December 31, 2016    June 30, 2018   December 31, 2017     

Federal funds purchased

  $117        132             $597        174               

Other short-term borrowings

   5,389        3,535              1,763        4,012               

Long-term debt

   13,456        14,388              14,321        14,904               

Total borrowings

  $               18,962                       18,055             $               16,681                   19,090               

Total borrowings increased $907 million,decreased $2.4 billion, or 5%13%, from December 31, 20162017 primarily due to an increasea decrease in other short-term borrowings. Other short-term borrowings partially offsetdecreased $2.2 billion from December 31, 2017 driven by a decrease in long-term debt. Other short-term borrowings increased $1.9 billion from December 31, 2016 driven by an increase of $1.9 billion in FHLB short-term borrowings.advances. The level of other short-term borrowings can fluctuate significantly from period to period depending on funding needs and which sources are used to satisfy those needs. For further information on the components of other short-term borrowings, refer to Note 1312 of the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements. Long-term debt decreased $932$583 million from December 31, 20162017 primarily driven by the maturity of $650$600 million of unsecured senior bank notes and $500 million of unsecured subordinated debt, and $478$264 million of pay downspaydowns on long-term debt associated with automobile loan securitizations and $86 million of fair value adjustments associated with interest rate swaps hedging long-term debt during the six months ended June 30, 2017.2018. These decreases were partially offset by the issuance of $700$650 million of unsecured fixed-rate senior notes in the second quarterand $250 million of unsecured floating-rate senior notes since December 31, 2017. For additional information regarding automobile securitizations andthe long-term debt issuance, refer to Note 10 and Note 1413 of the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

The following table summarizes components of average borrowings for the three months ended:

TABLE 26:24: Components of Average Borrowings

($ in millions)  June 30, 2017   June 30, 2016       June 30, 2018   June 30, 2017         

Federal funds purchased

  $311        693             $1,080        311               

Other short-term borrowings

   4,194        3,754              2,452        4,194               

Long-term debt

   13,273        15,351              14,579        13,273               

Total average borrowings

  $               17,778                       19,798             $               18,111                   17,778               

Total average borrowings decreased $2.0 billion,increased $333 million, or 10%2%, compared to June 30, 2016, primarily2017, due to decreases in average long-term debt. The decreaseincreases in average long-term debt of $2.1and average federal funds purchased partially offset by decreases in other short-term borrowings. Average long-term debt increased $1.3 billion compared to June 30, 2017. The increase was primarily driven primarily by the maturitiesissuance of $1.1 billion and $650 million of unsecured senior bank notes during the fourth quarter of 2017 and subordinated debt and pay downs on long-term debt associated with automobile loan securitizations,the first quarter of 2018, respectively, partially offset by issuancesthe maturity of long-term$500 million of unsecured subordinated debt sinceduring the second quarter of 2018. Average federal funds purchased increased $769 million due to additional borrowings. Average other short-term borrowings decreased $1.7 billion compared to June 30, 2016.2017, primarily driven by the decrease in FHLB advances. Information on the average rates paid on borrowings is discussed in the Net Interest Income subsection of the Statements of Income Analysis section of MD&A. In addition, refer to the Liquidity Risk Management subsection of the Risk Management section of MD&A for a discussion on the role of borrowings in the Bancorp’s liquidity management.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (continued)

 

 

BUSINESS SEGMENT REVIEW

The Bancorp reports on four business segments: Commercial Banking, Branch Banking, Consumer Lending and Wealth and Asset Management. Additional information on each business segment is included in Note 22 of the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements. Results of the Bancorp’s business segments are presented based on its management structure and management accounting practices. The structure and accounting practices are specific to the Bancorp; therefore, the financial results of the Bancorp’s business segments are not necessarily comparable with similar information for other financial institutions. The Bancorp refines its methodologies from time to time as management’s accounting practices orand businesses change.

The Bancorp manages interest rate risk centrally at the corporate level. By employing an FTP methodology, the business segments are insulated from most benchmark interest rate volatility, enabling them to focus on serving customers through the origination of loans and acceptance of deposits. The FTP methodology assigns charge rates and credit rates to classes of assets and liabilities, respectively, based on the estimated amount and timing of the cash flows for each transaction. Assigning the FTP rate based on matching the duration of cash flows allocates interest income and interest expense to each business segment so its resulting net interest income is insulated from future changes in benchmark interest rates. The Bancorp’s FTP methodology also allocates the contribution to net interest income of the asset-generating and deposit-providing businesses on a duration-adjusted basis to better attribute the driver of the performance. As the asset and liability durations are not perfectly matched, the residual impact of the FTP methodology is captured in General Corporate and Other. The charge and credit rates are determined using the FTP rate curve, which is based on an estimate of Fifth Third’s marginal borrowing cost in the wholesale funding markets. The FTP rate curve is constructed using the U.S. swap curve, brokered CD pricing and unsecured debt pricing.

The Bancorp adjusts the FTP charge and credit rates as dictated by changes in interest rates for various interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities and by the review of behaviouralbehavioral assumptions, such as prepayment rates on interest-earning assets and the estimated durations for indeterminate-lived deposits. Key assumptions, including the credit rates provided for deposit accounts, are reviewed annually. Credit rates for deposit products and charge rates for loan products may be reset more frequently in response to changes in market conditions. The credit rates for several deposit products were reset January 1, 20172018 to reflect the current market rates and updated market assumptions. These rates were generally higher than those in place during 2016,2017, thus net interest income for deposit-providing business segments was positively impacted during 2017.2018. FTP charge rates on assets were affected by the prevailing level of interest rates and by the duration and repricing characteristics of the portfolio. As overall market rates increased, the FTP charge increased for asset-generating business segments during 2017.2018.

The Bancorp’s methodology for allocating provision for loan and lease losses expense to the business segments includes charges or benefits associated with changes in criticized commercial loan levels in addition to actual net charge-offs experienced by the loans and leases owned by each business segment. Provision for loan and lease losses expense attributable to loan and lease growth and changes in ALLL factors is captured in General Corporate and Other. The financial results of the business segments include allocations for shared services and headquarters expenses. Additionally, the business segments form synergies by taking advantage of cross-sell opportunities and when funding operations by accessing the capital markets as a collective unit.

The results of operations and financial position for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017 were adjusted to reflect changes in internal expense allocation methodologies.

The following table summarizes net income (loss) by business segment:    

TABLE 27:25: Net Income (Loss) by Business Segment

           For the three months ended     
 June 30, 
          For the six months ended     
 June 30, 
($ in millions)    2017            2016(a)              2017        2016(a)         

Income Statement Data

         

Commercial Banking

 $ 227   226          437   438       

Branch Banking

  122   132          233   240       

Consumer Lending

  (6)  7          (17)  16       

Wealth and Asset Management

  19   23          37   48       

General Corporate and Other

     (64)          (18)  (92)      

Net income

  367   324          672   650       

Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests

     (4)            (4)      

Net income attributable to Bancorp

  367   328          672   654       

Dividends on preferred stock

   23   23           38   38       

Net income available to common shareholders

 $            344   305                      634   616       
(a)

Net tax deficiencies of $5 and $6 were reclassified from capital surplus to applicable income tax expense for the three and six months ended June 30, 2016, respectively, related to the early adoption of ASU2016-09 during the fourth quarter of 2016, with an effective date of January 1, 2016.
           For the three months ended     
 June  30, 
          For the six months ended     
 June 30, 
($ in millions)    2018            2017                  2018        2017             

Income Statement Data

         

Commercial Banking

 $ 289   237          547   453       

Branch Banking

  147   111          282   215       

Consumer Lending

  (3)  3          (14)  1       

Wealth and Asset Management

  33   17          44   33       

General Corporate and Other

   120   (1)          431   (30)      

Net income

 $            586   367                      1,290   672       

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (continued)

 

 

Commercial Banking

Commercial Banking offers credit intermediation, cash management and financial services to large and middle-market businesses and government and professional customers. In addition to the traditional lending and depository offerings, Commercial Banking products and services include global cash management, foreign exchange and international trade finance, derivatives and capital markets services, asset-based lending, real estate finance, public finance, commercial leasing and syndicated finance.

The following table contains selected financial data for the Commercial Banking segment:

TABLE 28:26: Commercial Banking

      For the three months ended    
 June 30, 
      For the six months ended    
 June 30, 
      For the three months ended    
 June 30, 
      For the six months ended    
 June 30, 
($ in millions)   2017    2016            2017     2016            2018    2017          2018       2017         

Income Statement Data

                

Net interest income (FTE)(a)

 $  421 466       851 923     $  431  421       853  851    

Provision for loan and lease losses

   22 72       29 137    

(Benefit from) provision for loan and lease losses

   (10) 22       (29) 29    

Noninterest income:

                

Corporate banking revenue

   100 117       173 218       119  100       205  173    

Service charges on deposits

   73 72       146 145       70  73       139  146    

Other noninterest income

   55 47       110 94       40  55       103  110    

Noninterest expense:

                

Personnel costs

   69 74       154 153       80  69       168  154    

Other noninterest expense

   276 281       560 563       278  261       575  535    

Income before income taxes (FTE)

   282 275       537 527       312  297       586  562    

Applicable income tax expense(a)(b)

   55 49       100 89       23  60       39  109    

Net income

 $  227 226       437 438     $  289  237       547  453    

Average Balance Sheet Data

                

Commercial loans and leases, including held for sale

 $  53,747 55,072       53,703 54,571     $  54,267  53,747       54,110  53,703    

Demand deposits

   19,227 20,622       19,555 20,518       16,593  19,227       17,358  19,555    

Interest checking deposits

   8,821 8,372       9,030 8,673       11,099  8,821       10,689  9,030    

Savings and money market deposits

   5,533 6,690       5,942 6,711       4,663  5,533       4,554  5,942    

Other time deposits and certificates $100,000 and over

   927 1,061       947 1,094       329  927       469  947    

Foreign office deposits

   379 483       391 482       370  379       431  391    
(a)

Includes FTE adjustments of$64and $6 for both the three months endedJune 30, 20172018 and 20162017, respectively, and$127and $12 for both the six months endedJune 30, 20172018 and 2016.2017, respectively. This is anon-GAAP measure.

(b)

Applicable income tax expense for all periods includes the tax benefit fromtax-exempt income,tax-advantaged investments and tax credits, partially offset by the effect of certain nondeductible expenses. Refer to the Applicable Income Taxes subsection of the Statements of Income Analysis section of MD&A for additional information.

Net income was $227$289 million for the three months ended June 30, 20172018 compared to net income of $226$237 million for the three months ended June 30, 2016. The increase2017. Net income was $547 million for the threesix months ended June 30, 20172018 compared to net income of $453 million for the six months ended June 30, 2017. The increase for both periods was driven by decreases in the provision for loan and lease losses and noninterest expense partially offset by decreases in net interest income on an FTE basis and noninterest income. Net income was $437 million for the six months ended June 30, 2017 compared to net income of $438 million for the six months ended June 30, 2016. The decrease for the six months ended June 30, 2017 was driven by decreasesincreases in net interest income on an FTE basis and noninterest income partially offset by decreasesincreases in the provision for loan and lease losses and noninterest expense.

Net interest income on an FTE basis decreased $45increased $10 million and $72$2 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017,2018, respectively, compared to the same periods in the prior year primarily driven by increases in yields on average commercial loans and leases and increases in FTP credits on interest checking deposits due to an increase in FTP credit rates. These increases were partially offset by increases in FTP charge rates on loans and leases and increases in the rates paid on core deposits. These decreases in net interest income were partially offset by increases in yields on average commercial loans and leases of 38 bps and 32 bps for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017, respectively, compared to the same periods in the prior year.

Provision for loan and lease losses decreased $50$32 million and $108$58 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017,2018, respectively, compared to the same periods in the prior year. The decrease for both periods wasyear primarily due todriven by decreases in criticized commercial loans andasset levels partially offset by increases in net charge-offs on commercial and industrial loans.charge-offs. Net charge-offs as a percent of average portfolio loans and leases decreasedincreased to 1433 bps and 23 bps for the three months ended June 30, 2017 compared to 32 bps for the same period in the prior year and decreased to 20 bps for the six months ended June 30, 20172018 compared to 3514 bps and 20 bps for the same periodperiods in the prior year.

Noninterest income decreased $8increased $1 million and $28$18 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017,2018, respectively, compared to the same periods in the prior year primarily due to decreasesincreases in corporate banking revenue partially offset by increasesdecreases in other noninterest income.income and service charges on deposits. Corporate banking revenue decreased $17increased $19 million and $45 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017, respectively, compared to the same periods in the prior year. The decrease in corporate banking revenue for the three months ended June 30, 2017 was primarily2018 compared to the same period in the prior year driven by decreasesincreases in syndication feesinstitutional sales revenue, contract revenue from commercial customer derivatives and foreign exchange fees partially offset by letter of credit fees. The decrease in corporateCorporate banking revenue increased $32 million for the six months ended June 30, 2017 was primarily2018 compared to the same period in the prior year driven by a decreaseincreases in lease remarketing fees, whichinstitutional sales revenue, contract revenue from commercial customer derivatives and foreign exchange fees partially offset by decreases in business lending fees and letter of credit fees. The increase in lease remarketing fees for the six months ended June 30, 2018 included the impact of a $31 million impairment charge related to certain operating lease assets that was recognized during the first quarter of 2017, as well as a decrease in foreign exchange fees.2017. Other noninterest income increased $8decreased $15 million and $16$7 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017,2018, respectively, compared to the same periods in the prior year driven by an increasedecreases in private equity investment income primarily dueincome. Additionally, service charges on deposits decreased $3 million and $7 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2018, respectively, compared to gains on the sale of certain private equity investments.same periods in the prior year.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (continued)

 

 

Noninterest expense decreased $10increased $28 million and $2$54 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017,2018, respectively, compared to the same periods in the prior year primarily as a result of decreasesincreases in other noninterest expense for both periods and a decrease in personnel costs for the three months ended June 30, 2017.costs. Other noninterest expense decreased $5increased $17 million and $3$40 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017,2018, respectively, compared to the same periods in the prior year primarily due to decreases in impairment on affordable housing investments and lower operational losses partially offset by increases in corporate overhead allocations and consulting expense.impairment on affordable housing investments. Personnel costs decreased $5increased $11 million for the three months ended June 30, 2017 compared to the same period in the prior year primarily due to lower incentive compensation.

Average commercial loans decreased $1.3 billion and $868$14 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017,2018, respectively, compared to the same periods in the prior year due to increased incentive compensation and base compensation.

Average commercial loans and leases increased $520 million and $407 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2018, respectively, compared to the same periods in the prior year primarily due to a decreaseincreases in average commercial and industrial loans and average commercial construction loans partially offset by an increasedecreases in average commercial constructionmortgage loans. Average commercial and industrial loans decreased $2.3 billionincreased $586 million and $1.7 billion$210 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017,2018, respectively, compared to the same periods in the prior year as a result of an increase in new loan originations as well as a decrease in payoffs. Average commercial construction loans increased $421 million and $558 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2018, respectively, compared to the same periods in the prior year primarily as a result of deliberate exits from certain loans that did not meet the Bancorp’s risk-adjusted profitability targetsdue to an increase in demand and softer loan demand.draw levels on existing commitments. Average commercial constructionmortgage loans increased $759decreased $288 million and $722$289 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017,2018, respectively, compared to the same periods in the prior year primarily asdue to a result of an increasedecline in new loan origination activity resulting fromdriven by increased competition and an increase in demand.paydowns.

Average core deposits decreased $2.2$1.2 billion and $1.5$1.9 billion for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017,2018, respectively, compared to the same periods in the prior year. The decrease for the three and six months ended June 30, 20172018 was primarily driven by decreases in average demand deposits of $1.4$2.6 billion and $963 million,$2.2 billion, respectively, and average savings and money market deposits of $1.2$870 million and $1.4 billion, and $769 million, respectively, compared to the same periods in the prior year.year primarily due to lower average balances per account. These decreases were partially offset by an increaseincreases in average interest checking deposits of $449 million$2.3 billion and $357 million$1.7 billion for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017,2018, respectively, compared to the same periods in the prior year.year primarily due to balance migration from demand deposit accounts and increases in average balances per account.

Branch Banking

Branch Banking provides a full range of deposit and loan products to individuals and small businesses through 1,1571,158 full-service banking centers. Branch Banking offers depository and loan products, such as checking and savings accounts, home equity loans and lines of credit, credit cards and loans for automobiles and other personal financing needs, as well as products designed to meet the specific needs of small businesses, including cash management services.

The following table contains selected financial data for the Branch Banking segment:

TABLE 29:27: Branch Banking

      For the three months ended    
June 30,    
       For the six months ended    
June 30,    
       For the three months ended    
June 30,    
       For the six months ended    
June 30,
 
($ in millions)      2017         2016      2017       2016         2018       2017      2018       2017   

Income Statement Data

                   

Net interest income

 $    437    433         867    859      $     499  437         965    867     

Provision for loan and lease losses

    39    35         80    69         47  39         90    80     

Noninterest income:

                   

Service charges on deposits

    66    66         130    129         67  66         134    130     

Card and processing revenue

    64    66         122    126         69  64         133    122     

Wealth and asset management revenue

    35    36         71    71         37  35         74    71     

Other noninterest income

    24    46         51    75         (6 24         12    51     

Noninterest expense:

                   

Personnel costs

    130    130         261    261         137  130         273    261     

Net occupancy and equipment expense

    56    59         116    117         56  56         113    116     

Card and processing expense

    33    36         62    70         30  33         59    62     

Other noninterest expense

    180    184         362    372         209  197         426    390     

Income before income taxes

    188    203         360    371         187  171         357    332     

Applicable income tax expense

    66    71         127    131         40  60         75    117     

Net income

 $    122    132         233    240      $     147  111         282    215     

Average Balance Sheet Data

                   

Consumer loans, including held for sale

 $    12,966    13,602         13,069    13,752     

Consumer loans

 $     12,873  12,966         12,953    13,069     

Commercial loans

    1,942    1,893         1,934    1,920         1,910  1,942         1,891    1,934     

Demand deposits

    13,980    13,416         13,820    13,274         14,467  13,980         14,262    13,820     

Interest checking deposits

    10,304    9,660         10,233    9,545         10,318  10,304         10,317    10,233     

Savings and money market deposits

    27,778    25,935         27,472    25,631         29,551  27,778         28,993    27,472     

Other time deposits and certificates $100,000 and over

    4,945    5,229         4,992    5,220         5,236  4,945         5,135    4,992     

Net income was $122$147 million for the three months ended June 30, 20172018 compared to net income of $132$111 million for the three months ended June 30, 2016.2017. Net income was $233$282 million for the six months ended June 30, 20172018 compared to $240$215 million for the same period in the prior year.six months ended June 30, 2017. The decreaseincrease for both periods was driven by increases in net interest income partially offset by decreases in noninterest income and increases in thenoninterest expense and provision for loan and lease losses partially offset by decreases in noninterest expenselosses.

Management’s Discussion and increases in net interest income.Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (continued)

Net interest income increased $4$62 million and $8$98 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017,2018, respectively, compared to the same periods in the prior year. The increase in net interest income for both periods was primarily due to an increaseincreases in FTP creditscredit rates on core deposits as well as increases in interest income on other consumer loans driven by higher average balances. The increase for the six months ended June 30, 2017 also included an increase in interest income on credit card which included the impact of a $12 million benefit related to a revised estimate of refunds offered to certain bankcard customers in the first quarter of 2017. These benefits for both periods were partially offset by increases in FTP charge rates on loans and leases and increases in the rates paid on coremoney market deposits.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis Additionally, for the six months ended June 30, 2018, the increase in net income interest was partially offset by the impact of Financial Condition and Resultsa $12 million benefit in the first quarter of Operations (continued)

2017 related to a revised estimate of refunds to be offered to certain bankcard customers.

Provision for loan and lease losses increased $4$8 million and $11$10 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017,2018, respectively, compared to the same periods in the prior year primarily due to increases in net charge-offs on credit card as netwell as the negative impact from higher criticized asset levels. Net charge-offs as a percent of average portfolio loans and leases increased to 112 bps and 117 bps for the three and six months ended June 30, 2018, respectively, compared to 104 bps and 106 bps for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017, respectively, compared to 89 bps for both the three and six months ended June 30, 2016.respectively.

Noninterest income decreased $25$22 million and $27$21 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017,2018, respectively, compared to the same periods in the prior year primarily as a result ofdue to decreases in other noninterest income.income partially offset by increases in card and processing revenue. Other noninterest income decreased $22$30 million and $39 million for the three months ended June 30, 2017 compared to the same period in the prior year primarily as a result of the impact of a gain of $11 million on the sale of certain branches in the Pittsburgh MSA in the second quarter of 2016 and a gain of $11 million on the sale of the agent bankcard loan portfolio during the second quarter of 2016. Other noninterest income decreased $24 million for the six months ended June 30, 20172018, respectively, compared to the same period in the prior year primarily due to the previously mentioned gains on the sale of certain branches and the agent bankcard loan portfolio in the second quarter of 2016 as well as the impact of a gain of $8 millionimpairment on the sale of certain branches in the St. Louis MSA in the first quarter of 2016. The decreases in other noninterest income were partially offset by increases of $4bank premises and equipment. Card and processing revenue increased $5 million and $7 million in ATM transaction fees for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017, respectively, compared to the same periods in the prior year.

Noninterest expense decreased $10 million and $19$11 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017,2018, respectively, compared to the same periods in the prior year primarily driven by decreasesan increase in other noninterestthe number of actively used cards and customer spend volume.

Noninterest expense and card and processing expense. Other noninterest expense decreased $4increased $16 million and $10$42 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017, respectively, compared to the same periods in the prior year primarily driven by a decline in corporate overhead allocations. The decrease for the six months ended was also driven by decreases in operational losses. Card and processing expense decreased $3 million and $8 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017,2018, respectively, compared to the same periods in the prior year primarily due to the impact of renegotiated service contracts.

Average consumer loans decreased $636increases in other noninterest expense and personnel expense. Other noninterest expense increased $12 million and $683$36 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017,2018, respectively, compared to the same periods in the prior year primarily due to increases in corporate overhead allocations, marketing expense and loan and lease expense. Personnel expense increased $7 million and $12 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2018, respectively, compared to the same periods in the prior year primarily due to higher base compensation.

Average consumer loans decreased $93 million and $116 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2018, respectively, compared to the same periods in the prior year. The decrease for both periods was primarily driven by decreases in average home equity loans of $536$560 million and $533$546 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017,2018, respectively, and decreases in average residential mortgage loans of $216$321 million and $220$320 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017,2018, respectively, compared to the same periods in the prior year as payoffs exceeded new loan production.

Average core deposits increased $2.8 billion The decrease for both periods was partially offset by increases in average other consumer loans of $944 million and $918 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 20172018, respectively, compared to the same periods in the prior year primarily due to growth inpoint-of-sale loan originations.

Average core deposits increased $2.6 billion and $2.2 billion for the three and six months ended June 30, 2018 compared to the same periods in the prior year. The increase for both periods was primarily driven by growth in average savings and money market deposits of $1.8 billion growth in average interest checking deposits of $644 million and $688 million, respectively,$1.5 billion and growth in average demand deposits of $564$487 million and $546$442 million respectively, for the three and six months ended June 30, 20172018, respectively, compared to the same periods in the prior year. The growth in average savings and money market deposits, average interest checking deposits and average demand deposits was driven by an increaseyear primarily due to increases in average balances per customer account and the acquisition of new customers.

Consumer Lending

Consumer Lending includes the Bancorp’s residential mortgage, home equity, automobile and other indirect lending activities. Lending activities include the origination, retention and servicing of residential mortgage and home equity loans or lines of credit, sales and securitizations of those loans, pools of loans or lines of credit and all associated hedging activities. Indirect lending activities include extending loans to consumers through correspondent lenders and automobile dealers.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (continued)

The following table contains selected financial data for the Consumer Lending segment:

TABLE 30:28: Consumer Lending

        For the three months ended    
June 30,    
       For the six months ended    
June 30,    
 
($ in millions)      2017     2016       2017    2016   

Income Statement Data

        

Net interest income

 $    59   62         120   122     

Provision for loan and lease losses

    7   9         22   21     

Noninterest income:

        

Mortgage banking net revenue

    54   73         105   151     

Other noninterest income

    8   7         11   13     

Noninterest expense:

        

Personnel costs

    50   50         97   98     

Other noninterest expense

       73   72            144   142     

Income (loss) before income taxes

    (9  11         (27  25     

Applicable income tax (benefit) expense

       (3  4            (10  9     

Net income (loss)

 $    (6  7            (17  16     

Average Balance Sheet Data

        

Residential mortgage loans, including held for sale

 $    11,429   10,277         11,296   10,057     

Home equity

    301   365         307   375     

Automobile loans

       8,921   10,365            9,080   10,568     

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (continued)

        For the three months ended    
June 30,    
       For the six months ended    
June 30,    
 
($ in millions)      2018     2017       2018    2017   

Income Statement Data

        

Net interest income

 $     59   59         118   120     

Provision for loan and lease losses

    8   7         20   22     

Noninterest income:

        

Mortgage banking net revenue

    52   54         106   105     

Other noninterest income

    -   8         (10  11     

Noninterest expense:

        

Personnel costs

    52   50         102   97     

Other noninterest expense

       55   59            109   116     

(Loss) income before income taxes

    (4  5         (17  1     

Applicable income tax (benefit) expense

       (1  2            (3  -     

Net (loss) income

 $     (3  3            (14  1     

Average Balance Sheet Data

        

Residential mortgage loans, including held for sale

 $     11,838   11,429         11,758   11,296     

Home equity

    249   301         254   307     

Automobile loans

       8,638   8,921            8,670   9,080     

Consumer Lending incurred a net lossesloss of $6 million and $17$3 million for the three andmonths ended June 30, 2018 compared to net income of $3 million for the three months ended June 30, 2017. Consumer Lending incurred a net loss of $14 million for the six months ended June 30, 2017, respectively,2018 compared to net income of $7 million and $16$1 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2016, respectively.2017. The decrease for both periods was primarily driven by decreases in noninterest income.income partially offset by decreases in the noninterest expense.

Net interest income decreased $3Provision for loan and lease losses increased $1 million and decreased $2 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017, respectively, compared to the same periods in the prior year. The decrease for both periods was primarily driven by increases in FTP charge rates on loans and leases partially offset by increases in yields on average consumer loans.

Provision for loan and lease losses decreased $2 million and increased $1 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017,2018, respectively, compared to the same periods in the prior year. Net charge-offs as a percent of average portfolio loans and leases decreasedincreased to 1416 bps for the three months ended June 30, 20172018 compared to 1714 bps for the same period in the prior year and increaseddecreased to 2220 bps for the six months ended June 30, 20172018 compared to 2022 bps for the same period in the prior year.

Noninterest income decreased $18$10 million and $48$20 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017,2018, respectively, compared to the same period in the prior year driven by decreases in other noninterest income. Other noninterest income decreased $8 million and $21 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2018, respectively, compared to the same periods in the prior year primarily due to decreasesincreases in mortgage banking net revenue. The decrease in mortgage banking net revenuelosses on securities related tonon-qualifying hedges on MSRs resulting from increased interest rates.

Noninterest expense decreased $2 million for both the three and six months ended June 30, 20172018 compared to the same periods in the prior year was primarily driven by decreases in mortgage origination fees and gains on loan sales of $16other noninterest expense partially offset by increases in personnel expense. Other noninterest expense decreased $4 million and $30 million, respectively, and decreases in net mortgage servicing revenue of $3 million and $16 million, respectively. Refer to the Noninterest Income subsection of the Statements of Income Analysis of MD&A for additional information on the fluctuations in mortgage banking net revenue.

Average consumer loans decreased $356 million and $317$7 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017,2018, respectively, compared to the same periods in prior year primarily due to decreases in operational losses. Personnel expense increased $2 million and $5 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2018, respectively, compared to the same periods in prior year primarily due to increases in base compensation.

Average consumer loans increased $74 million and decreased $1 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2018, respectively, compared to the same periods in the prior year. Average automobile loans decreased $1.4 billion$283 million and $1.5 billion$410 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017,2018, respectively, compared to the same periods in the prior year as payoffs exceeded new loan production due to a strategic shift focusing on improving risk-adjusted returns. Average residential mortgage loans increased $1.2 billion$409 million and $462 million for both the three and six months ended June 30, 2017,2018, respectively, compared to the same periods in the prior year primarily driven by the continued retention of certain agency conforming ARMs and certain other fixed-rate loans.

Wealth and Asset Management

Wealth and Asset Management provides a full range of investment alternatives for individuals, companies andnot-for-profit organizations. Wealth and Asset Management is made up of fourfive main businesses: FTS, an indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of the Bancorp;FTS; ClearArc Capital, Inc., an indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of the Bancorp;; Fifth Third Insurance Agency, Inc.; Fifth Third Private Bank; and Fifth Third Institutional Services. FTS offers full-servicefull service retail brokerage services to individual clients and broker dealerbroker-dealer services to the institutional marketplace. ClearArc Capital, Inc. provides asset management services. Fifth Third Insurance Agency, Inc. assists clients with their financial and risk management needs. Fifth Third Private Bank offers holistic strategies to affluent clients in wealth planning, investing, insurance and wealth protection. Fifth Third Institutional Services provides advisory services for institutional clients including states and municipalities.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (continued)

The following table contains selected financial data for the Wealth and Asset Management segment:

TABLE 31:29: Wealth and Asset Management

      For the three months ended    
June 30,    
       For the six months ended    
June 30,    
       For the three months ended    
June 30,    
       For the six months ended    
June 30,    
 
($ in millions)      2017     2016       2017       2016         2018     2017       2018       2017   

Income Statement Data

                  

Net interest income

  $    37  44         75    87       $    45  37          88    75     

Provision for (benefit from) loan and lease losses

    (1 1         3    1         (11 (1)         5    3     

Noninterest income:

                  

Wealth and asset management revenue

    100  98         205    197         104  100          214    205     

Other noninterest income

    1  2         4    5         5  1          13    4     

Noninterest expense:

                  

Personnel costs

    44  42         92    87         50  44          104    92     

Other noninterest expense

    66  66         132    128         73  69          150    139     

Income before income taxes

    29  35         57    73         42  26          56    50     

Applicable income tax expense

    10  12         20    25         9  9          12    17     

Net income

 $    19  23         37    48       $    33  17          44    33     

Average Balance Sheet Data

                  

Loans and leases, including held for sale

 $    3,266  3,113         3,252    3,090       $    3,446  3,266          3,391    3,252     

Core deposits

    8,577  8,357         8,810    8,611         9,124  8,577          9,386    8,810     

Net income was $19$33 million for the three months ended June 30, 20172018 compared to net income of $23$17 million for the three months ended June 30, 2016.2017. Net income was $37$44 million for the six months ended June 30, 20172018 compared to $48$33 million for the six months ended June 30, 2016.2017. The decreasesincreases for both periods were driven primarily by decreasesincreases in net interest income. The decrease for the six months ended was also driven by an increase inincome and noninterest expenseincome partially offset by an increaseincreases in noninterest income.expense. Additionally, net income for the three months ended June 30, 2018 was positively impacted by the decrease in provision for loan and lease losses compared to the same period in the prior year.

Net interest income decreased $7increased $8 million and $12$13 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017,2018, respectively, compared to the same periods in the prior year primarily due to increases in FTP chargecredit rates on loansinterest checking deposits and leasesmoney market deposits as well as increases in FTP charges due to increases inyields on average loan balances. Additionally, net interest income was negatively impactedloans and leases. These positive impacts were partially offset by increases in the rates paid on interest checking deposits and decreases in FTP credit rates on interest checking deposits. These negative impacts were partially offset by increases in yields on average loans and leases as well as increasesan increase in interest incomeFTP charge rates on loans and leases due to increases in average balances.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (continued)

leases.

Provision for loan and lease losses decreased $10 million for the three months ended June 30, 2018 compared to the same period in the prior year driven by the impact of the benefit of lower criticized assets. Provision for loan and lease losses increased $2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2018 compared to the same period in the prior year driven by an increase in net charge-offs partially offset by the impact of the benefit of lower criticized assets.

Noninterest income increased $8 million and increased $2$18 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017, respectively,2018 compared to the same periods in the prior year primarily driven by fluctuationsincreases in criticized assets.

Noninterest income increased $7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2017 compared to the same period in the prior year.wealth and asset management revenue and other noninterest income. Wealth and asset management revenue increased $8$4 million and $9 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 20172018 compared to the same periodperiods in the prior year primarily due to increases in private client service fees and securities and brokerage fees. These increases were driven by an increase in assets under management as a result of strong market performance and increased asset production.

Noninterest expense Other noninterest income increased $4 million and $9 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 20172018 compared to the same periodperiods in the prior year due to increases in insurance income as a result of acquisitions in 2017.

Noninterest expense increased $10 million and $23 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2018, respectively, compared to the same periods in the prior year. Personnel costs increased $5$6 million and $12 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 20172018 compared to the same periodperiods in the prior year driven by an increase in base compensation and incentive compensation as a result of the aforementioned acquisitions in 2017. Other noninterest expense increased $4 million and $11 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2018, respectively, compared to the same periods in the prior year primarily driven by higher incentive compensation. Other noninterest expense increased $4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2017 compared to the same period in the prior year primarily driven by an increaseincreases in corporate overhead allocations.

Average loans and leases increased $153$180 million and $162$139 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017,2018, respectively, compared to the same periods in the prior year driven by increases in average residential mortgage loans due to increases in new loan origination activity. These increases were partially offset by a decline in average home equity balances.

Average core deposits increased $220$547 million and $199$576 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017,2018, respectively, compared to the same periods in the prior year primarily due to increases in average interest checking deposits and average savings and money market deposits.

General Corporate and Other

General Corporate and Other includes the unallocated portion of the investment securities portfolio, securities gains and losses, certainnon-core deposit funding, unassigned equity, unallocated provision for loan and lease losses expense or a benefit from the reduction of the ALLL, the payment of preferred stock dividends and certain support activities and other items not attributed to the business segments.

Net interest income increased $88 million and $145decreased $1 million for the three months ended June 30, 2018 compared to the same period in the prior year driven by increases in FTP credit rates on deposits allocated to the business segments and increases in interest expense for long-term debt and federal funds purchased. The decrease for the three months ended June 30, 2018 was partially offset by an increase in the benefit related to the FTP charges on loans and leases as well as an increase in interest income on taxable securities.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (continued)

Net interest income increased $28 million for the six months ended June 30, 2017, respectively,2018 compared to the same periodsperiod in the prior year. The increase for both periods wasyear primarily driven by an increase in the benefit related to the FTP charges on loans and leases as well as an increase in interest income on taxable securities. These positive impacts wereThe increase for the six months ended June 30, 2018 was partially offset by increases in FTP credit rates on deposits allocated to the business segments and an increase in interest expense on long-term debt as well as an increaseand federal funds purchased.

The provision for loan and lease losses increased $14 million for the three months ended June 30, 2018 compared to the same period in FTP credits on deposits allocatedthe prior year primarily due to the decrease in the allocation of provision expense to the business segments due to increasesdriven by a decrease in FTP credit rates and average deposits.

commercial criticized assets. The benefit from the provision for loan and lease losses decreased $11$22 million for the six months ended June 30, 2018 compared to the same period in the prior year primarily due to the benefit from the reduction of the ALLL.

Noninterest income increased $203 million and $10$572 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017,2018, respectively, compared to the same periods in the prior year due to decreases inprimarily driven by the allocationrecognition of provision expense toa $205 million gain on the business segments.

Noninterest income increased $14 million and decreased $52 million forsale of Worldpay, Inc. shares during the three andsecond quarter of 2018. The increase during the six months ended June 30, 2017, respectively, compared2018 also included a $414 million gain related to Vantiv, Inc.’s acquisition of Worldpay Group plc. during the same periods in the prior year.first quarter of 2018. Both periods were positivelynegatively impacted by a decreasean increase in the negative valuation adjustments related to the Visa total return swap which were $9$10 million and $22$49 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017,2018, respectively, compared with $50$9 million and $22 million for boththe same periods in the prior year. The three and six months ended June 30, 2016 included positive valuation adjustments on the stock warrant associated with Vantiv Holding, LLC of $19 million and $66 million, respectively. The stock warrant was not outstanding during 2017 as the Bancorp exercised the remaining warrant in Vantiv Holding, LLC during the fourth quarter of 2016. Additionally, equity method earnings from the Bancorp’s interest in Vantiv Holding, LLC decreased $6$12 million and $7$25 million compared to the three and six months ended June 30, 2016, respectively.2017, respectively, primarily due to a decrease in the Bancorp’s ownership percentage in Vantiv Holding, LLC and the impact of Worldpay, Inc.’s acquisition and integration costs.

Noninterest expense decreased $10increased $29 million and $14$25 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017,2018, respectively, compared to the same periods in the prior year. The decreaseincrease for both periods was primarily due to increases in personnel costs and technology and communications expense partially offset by increases in corporate overhead allocations from General Corporate and Other to the other business segments and decreases in the provision for the reserve for unfunded commitments partially offset by increasescommitments. Additionally, both periods included an increase of $10 million in personnel costs and marketing expense.donations expense compared to the same period in the prior year as a result of a contribution to the Fifth Third Foundation in the second quarter of 2018.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (continued)

 

 

RISK MANAGEMENT – OVERVIEW

Risk management is critical for effectively serving customers’ financial needs while protecting the Bancorp and achieving strategic goals. It is also essential to reducing the volatility of earnings and safeguarding our brand and reputation. Further, risk management is integral to the Bancorp’s strategic and capital planning processes. It is essential that the Bancorp’s business strategies consistently align to its overall risk appetite and capital considerations. Maintaining risks within the Bancorp’s risk appetite requires that risks are understood by all employees across the enterprise, and appropriate risk mitigants and controls are in place to limit risk to within the risk appetite. To achieve this, the Bancorp implements a framework for managing risk that encompasses business as usual activities and the utilization of a risk process for identifying, assessing, managing, monitoring and reporting risks.

Fifth Third uses a structure consisting of three lines of defense in order to clarify the roles and responsibilities for effective risk management.

The risk taking functions within the lines of business comprise the first line of defense. The first line of defense originates risk through normal business as usual activities; therefore, it is essential that they monitor, assess and manage the risks being taken, implement controls necessary to mitigate those risks and take responsibility for managing their business within the Bancorp’s risk appetite.

Control functions, such as the Risk Management organization, are the second line of defense and are responsible for providing challenge, oversight and governance of activities performed by the first line.

The Audit division is the third line of defense and provides an independent assessment of the Bancorp’s internal control structure and related systems and processes. The Credit Risk Review division provides an independent assessment of credit risk, which includes evaluating the sufficiency of underwriting, documentation and approval processes for consumer and commercial credits, the accuracy of risk grades assigned to commercial credit exposure, nonaccrual status, specific reserves and monitoring for charge-offs.

The Audit division is the third line of defense and provides an independent assessment of the Bancorp’s internal control structure and related systems and processes.

Fifth Third’s core values and culture provide a foundation for supporting sound risk management practices by setting expectations for appropriate conduct and accountability across the organization.

All employees are expected to conduct themselves in alignment with Fifth Third’s core values and Code of Business Conduct and Business& Ethics, which may be found onwww.53.com, while carrying out their responsibilities. Fifth Third’s Corporate Responsibility and Reputation Committee provides oversight of business conduct policies, programs and strategies and monitors reporting of potential misconduct, trends or themes across the enterprise. Prudent risk management is a responsibility that is expected from all employees across the first, second and third lines of defense and is a foundational element of Fifth Third’s culture.

Below are the Bancorp’s core principles of risk management that are used to ensure the Bancorp is operating in a safe and sound manner:

  

Understand the risks taken as a necessary part of business; however, the Bancorp ensures risks taken are in alignment with its strategy and risk appetite.

  

Provide transparency and escalate risks and issues as necessary.

  

Ensure Fifth Third’s products and services are designed, delivered and maintained to provide value and benefit to its customers and to Fifth Third, and that potential opportunities remain aligned to the core customer base. The Bancorp does not offer products or services that are not appropriate for its customers.

  

Avoid risks that cannot be understood, managed and monitored.

  

Act with integrity in all activities.

  

Focus on providing operational excellence by providing reliable, accurate and efficient services to meet customer’s needs.

  

Maintain a strong financial position to ensure that the Bancorp meets its strategic objectives through all economic cycles and areis able to access the capital markets at all times, even under stressed conditions.

  

Protect the Bancorp’s reputation by thoroughly understanding the consequences of business strategies, products and processes.

  

Conduct business in compliance with all applicable laws, rules and regulations and in alignment with internal policies and procedures.

Fifth Third’s success is dependent on effective risk management and understanding and controlling the risks taken in order to deliver sustainable returns for employees and shareholders. The Bancorp’s goal is to ensure that aggregate risks do not exceed its risk capacity, and that risks taken are supportive of the Bancorp’s portfolio diversification and profitability objectives.

Fifth Third’sRisk Management Framework,statesFrameworkstates its risk appetite and the linkage to strategic and capital planning, defines and sets the tolerance for each of the eight risk types, explains the process used to manage risk across the enterprise and sets forth its risk governance structure.

 

  

The Board of Directors (the “Board”) and executive management define the risk appetite, which is considered in the development of business strategies, and forms the basis for enterprise risk management. The Bancorp’s risk appetite is set annually in alignment with the strategic, capital and financial plans, and is reviewed by the Board on an annual basis.

  

The Risk Management Process provides a consistent and integrated approach for managing risks and ensuring appropriate risk mitigants and controls are in place, and risks and issues are appropriately escalated. Five components are utilized for effective risk management; identifying, assessing, managing, monitoring and reporting risks.

  

The Board and executive management have identified eight risk types for monitoring the overall risk of the Bancorp; Credit Risk, Market Risk, Liquidity Risk, Operational Risk, Regulatory Compliance Risk, Legal Risk, Reputation Risk and Strategic Risk, and have also qualitatively established a risk tolerance, which is defined as the maximum amount of risk the Bancorp is willing to take for each of the eight risk types. These risk types are assessed on an ongoing basis and reported to the board each quarter, or more frequently, if necessary. In addition, each business and operational function (first line of defense) is accountable for proactively identifying and managing risk using its risk management process.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (continued)

Risk tolerances and risk limits are also established, where appropriate, in order to ensure that businesses and operational functions across the enterprise are able to monitor and manage risks at a more granular level, while ensuring that aggregate risks across the enterprise do not exceed the overall risk appetite.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (continued)

  

The Bancorp’s risk governance structure includes management committees operating under delegation from, and providing information directly or indirectly to, the Board. The Bancorp Board delegates certain responsibilities to Boardsub-committees, including the RCC as outlined in each respective Committee Charter, which may be found onhttps://www.53.com. The ERMC, which reports to the RCC, comprises senior management from across the Bancorp and reviews and approves risk management frameworks and policies, oversees the management of all risk types to ensure that aggregated risks remain within the Bancorp’s risk appetite and fosters a risk culture to ensure appropriate escalation and transparency of risks.

CREDIT RISK MANAGEMENT

The objective of the Bancorp’s credit risk management strategy is to quantify and manage credit risk on an aggregate portfolio basis, as well as to limit the risk of loss resulting from the failure of a borrower or counterparty to honor its financial or contractual obligations to the Bancorp. The Bancorp’s credit risk management strategy is based on three core principles: conservatism, diversification and monitoring. The Bancorp believes that effective credit risk management begins with conservative lending practices which are described below. These practices include the use of intentional risk-based limits for single name exposures and counterparty selection criteria designed to reduce or eliminate exposure to borrowers who have higher than average default risk and defined weaknesses in financial performance. The Bancorp carefully designed and monitors underwriting, documentation and collection standards. The Bancorp’s credit risk management strategy also emphasizes diversification on a geographic, industry and customer level as well as ongoing portfolio monitoring and timely management reviews of large credit exposures and credits experiencing deterioration of credit quality. Credit officers with the authority to extend credit are delegated specific authority amounts, the utilization of which is closely monitored. Underwriting activities are centrally managed, and ERM manages the policy and the authority delegation process directly. The Credit Risk Review function provides independent and objective assessments of the quality of underwriting and documentation, the accuracy of risk grades and thecharge-off, nonaccrual and reserve analysis process. The Bancorp’s credit review process and overall assessment of the adequacy of the allowance for credit losses is based on quarterly assessments of the probable estimated losses inherent in the loan and lease portfolio. The Bancorp uses these assessments to promptly identify potential problem loans or leases within the portfolio, maintain an adequate allowance for credit losses and take any necessary charge-offs. The Bancorp defines potential problem loans and leases as those rated substandard that do not meet the definition of a nonaccrual loan or a restructured loan. Refer to Note 6 of the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for further information on the Bancorp’s credit grade categories, which are derived from standard regulatory rating definitions. In addition, stress testing is performed on various commercial and consumer portfolios using the CCAR model and for certain portfolios, such as real estate and leveraged lending, the stress testing is performed by Credit department personnel at the individual loan level during credit underwriting.

The following tables provide a summary of potential problem portfolio loans and leases:

 

TABLE 32: Potential Problem Portfolio Loans and Leases                     
As of June 30, 2017 ($ in millions)    Carrying  
Value  
     Unpaid  
Principal  
Balance  
     Exposure   
TABLE 30: Potential Problem Portfolio Loans and Leases                   
As of June 30, 2018 ($ in millions)      

Carrying 

Value 

   Unpaid 
Principal 
Balance 
   Exposure  

Commercial and industrial loans

  $   1,024      1,025      1,531     $            590         591    845 

Commercial mortgage loans

   155      155      159     129         129    130 

Commercial leases

    28      28      28      57         57    57 

Total potential problem portfolio loans and leases

  $   1,207      1,208      1,718      $            776         777    1,032 
TABLE 33: Potential Problem Portfolio Loans and Leases                     
As of December 31, 2016 ($ in millions)    Carrying  
Value  
     Unpaid  
Principal  
Balance  
     Exposure   
TABLE 31: Potential Problem Portfolio Loans and Leases                   
As of December 31, 2017 ($ in millions)      

Carrying 

Value 

   Unpaid 
Principal 
Balance  
   Exposure  

Commercial and industrial loans

  $  1,108      1,110      1,807     $            911          912    1,370 

Commercial mortgage loans

  102      102      104     138          138    138 

Commercial leases

   22      22      22      70          70    70 

Total potential problem portfolio loans and leases

  $  1,232      1,234      1,933      $         1,119          1,120    1,578 

In addition to the individual review of larger commercial loans that exhibit probable or observed credit weaknesses, the commercial credit review process includes the use of two risk grading systems. The risk grading system currently utilized for allowance for credit loss analysis purposes encompasses ten categories. The Bancorp also maintains a dual risk rating system for credit approval and pricing, portfolio monitoring and capital allocation that includes a“through-the-cycle” rating philosophy for assessing a borrower’s creditworthiness. A“through-the-cycle” rating philosophy uses a grading scale that assigns ratings based on average default rates through an entire business cycle for borrowers with similar financial performance. The dual risk rating system includes thirteen probabilities of default grade categories and an additional eleven grade categories for estimating losses given an event of default. The probability of default and loss given default evaluations are not separated in theten-category risk rating system. The Bancorp has completed significant validation and testing of the dual risk rating system as a commercial credit risk management tool. The Bancorp is assessing the necessary modifications to the dual risk rating system outputs to develop a U.S. GAAP compliant ALLL model and will evaluate the use of modified dual risk ratings for purposes of determining the Bancorp’s ALLL as part of the Bancorp’s adoption of ASU2016-13Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments,” which will be effective for the Bancorp on January 1, 2020. Scoring systems, various analytical tools and portfolio performance monitoring are used to assess the credit risk in the Bancorp’s homogenous consumer and small business loan portfolios.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (continued)

 

 

Overview

Economic growth continues to improve as data has been broadly positive. There have been steady gainsInflationary expectations by market professionals continue with increasing focus on wages, interest rates, input costs, tariffs, trade negotiations and foreign exchange. In light of higher inflationary expectations and a strong employment outlook, the FOMC enacted a 25 bp increase in the job markettarget rate for Federal Funds target rate in June 2018 and indicated a positive outlook on the economy. The Federal Reserve median forecast for change in 2018 real GDP is expectedwas raised to expand2.8%.

The TCJA was enacted at a moderate pacepoint in 2017. Household spending continuesthe cycle where the economy appeared to be growing, the strongest driver ofunemployment rate was low and market professionals believed that it was likely to continue falling and there was increasing confidence in the U.S. economy. Inflation continuesmarket that inflation may move to run below2% over the FRB’s stated objective. Improving global conditions are supporting U.S. manufacturing activity and housing prices continue to increase across the country. With regard tomedium term.

The Bancorp maintains a focus on commercial real estate the credit market has become somewhat more selective even though marketexposure. Market data and vacancies remain positive. Credit department personnelpositive; however credit markets in commercial real estate are becoming more selective around certain asset types and geographies. The Bancorp is also monitoring potential increased risks in the Retail sector as a result of profitability declines among many large retailerschanges in distribution models with increasing levels of online purchasing and a continued shift to online purchasing;recent weakness in addition the Healthcare sector is being watched closely due to potential regulatory changes that may impact some companies in this industry.certain specialty retailers.

Commercial Portfolio

The Bancorp’s credit risk management strategy seeks to minimize concentrations of risk through diversification. The Bancorp has commercial loan concentration limits based on industry, lines of business within the commercial segment, geography and credit product type. The risk within the commercial loan and lease portfolio is managed and monitored through an underwriting process utilizing detailed origination policies, continuous loan level reviews, monitoring of industry concentration and product type limits and continuous portfolio risk management reporting.

The Bancorp provides loans to a variety of customers ranging from large multi-national firms to middle market businesses, sole proprietors and high net worth individuals. The origination policies for commercial and industrial loans outline the risks and underwriting requirements for loans to businesses in various industries. Included in the policies are maturity and amortization terms, collateral and leverage requirements, cash flow coverage measures and hold limits. The Bancorp aligns credit and sales teams with specific industry expertise to better monitor and manage different industry segments of the portfolio.

The origination policies for commercial real estate outline the risks and underwriting requirements for owner and nonowner-occupied and construction lending. Included in the policies are maturity and amortization terms, maximum LTVs, minimum debt service coverage ratios, construction loan monitoring procedures, appraisal requirements,pre-leasing requirements (as applicable), sensitivity andpro-forma analysis requirements and interest rate sensitivity. The Bancorp requires a valuation of real estate collateral, which may include third-party appraisals, be performed at the time of origination and renewal in accordance with regulatory requirements and on an as neededas-needed basis when market conditions justify. Although the Bancorp does not back test these collateral value assumptions, the Bancorp maintains an appraisal review department to order and review third-party appraisals in accordance with regulatory requirements. Collateral values on criticized assets with relationships exceeding $1 million are reviewed quarterly to assess the appropriateness of the value ascribed in the assessment of charge-offs and specific reserves.

The Bancorp assesses all real estate andnon-real estate collateral securing a loan and considers all cross-collateralized loans in the calculation of the LTV ratio. The following tables provide detail on the most recent LTV ratios for commercial mortgage loans greater than $1 million, excluding impaired commercial mortgage loans individually evaluated. The Bancorp does not typically aggregate the LTV ratios for commercial mortgage loans less than $1 million.

TABLE 32: Commercial Mortgage Loans Outstanding by LTV, Loans Greater Than $1 Million 
As of June 30, 2018 ($ in millions) LTV > 100%  LTV 80-100%  LTV < 80%   

Commercial mortgage owner-occupied loans

 $              111       177        2,213       

Commercial mortgage nonowner-occupied loans

  15       176        2,180       

Total

 $126       353        4,393       
TABLE 33: Commercial Mortgage Loans Outstanding by LTV, Loans Greater Than $1 Million         
As of December 31, 2017 ($ in millions) LTV > 100%  LTV80-100%  LTV < 80% 

Commercial mortgage owner-occupied loans

 $79       110        2,222       

Commercial mortgage nonowner-occupied loans

  14       169        2,208       

Total

 $93       279        4,430       

TABLE 34: Commercial Mortgage Loans Outstanding by LTV, Loans Greater Than $1 Million
As of June 30, 2017 ($ in millions)  LTV > 100%    LTV 80-100%   LTV < 80%  

Commercial mortgage owner-occupied loans

  $              78         163         2,087      

Commercial mortgage nonowner-occupied loans

   17         146         2,522      

Total

  $95         309         4,609      
TABLE 35: Commercial Mortgage Loans Outstanding by LTV, Loans Greater Than $1 Million
As of December 31, 2016 ($ in millions)  LTV > 100%  LTV80-100%   LTV < 80%  

Commercial mortgage owner-occupied loans

  $106         178         1,953      

Commercial mortgage nonowner-occupied loans

   22         100         2,598      

Total

  $128         278         4,551      

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (continued)

 

 

The following table provides detail on commercial loans and leases by industry classification (as defined by the North American Industry Classification System), by loan size and by state, illustrating the diversity and granularity of the Bancorp’s commercial loans and leases as of:

 

TABLE 36: Commercial Loan and Lease Portfolio (excluding loans held for sale) 
TABLE 34: Commercial Loan and Lease Portfolio (excluding loans and leases held for sale)TABLE 34: Commercial Loan and Lease Portfolio (excluding loans and leases held for sale) 
  June 30, 2017   December 31, 2016   June 30, 2018  December 31, 2017
($ in millions)  Outstanding   Exposure    Nonaccrual   Outstanding   Exposure    Nonaccrual    Outstanding   Exposure   Nonaccrual   Outstanding  Exposure   Nonaccrual

By Industry:

                       

Manufacturing

  $       9,960         18,642    78     10,070        19,646    50      $     10,155   19,284    47     10,044      18,948    74 

Real estate

   7,716         12,417    28     7,206        11,919    26       7,692   12,540    31     7,713      12,493    25 

Financial services and insurance

   5,628         11,402        5,648        11,522    2       5,895   12,309        5,792      11,933    1 

Healthcare

   4,534         6,390        4,649        6,450    23       4,449   6,416    34     4,712      6,486    35 

Business services

   4,170         6,530    71     4,599        6,996    65       4,132   6,739    31     4,147      6,512    42 

Retail trade

   4,089         7,681        4,048        7,598    6       3,407   7,242        3,617      7,950    3 

Accommodation and food

   3,388   5,560    33     3,268      5,321    4 

Wholesale trade

   3,290         5,878    14     3,482        6,249    24       3,276   5,387        3,017      5,363    6 

Accommodation and food

   3,256         4,976        3,051        4,817    5    

Communication and information

   2,960   5,240        3,322      5,308    - 

Transportation and warehousing

   3,009         4,438    63     3,059        4,473    38       2,935   4,857    49     3,012      4,621    29 

Communication and information

   2,957         4,980        2,901        4,726    -    

Construction

   2,297         4,190        2,025        3,786    3       2,422   4,508        2,374      4,449    2 

Mining

   1,964   3,642    50     1,454      3,001    56 

Entertainment and recreation

   1,788         3,050        1,736        2,979    3       1,581   3,178        1,624      2,911    7 

Mining

   1,277         2,600    183     1,312        2,621    246    

Utilities

   834         2,276        1,168        2,799    -       756   2,141        869      2,333    - 

Other services

   696         909    16     729        945    24       750   1,010    10     714      1,017    16 

Public administration

   428         521        417        463    -       443   663        370      474    - 

Agribusiness

   298         458        284        426    2       267   441        304      478    2 

Individuals

   40         57        66        83    1       29   67        27      57    - 

Other

   38         38        2        2    5       2   2        15      15    4 

Total

  $56,305         97,433    485     56,452        98,500    523      $56,503   101,226    305     56,395      99,670    306 

By Loan Size:

            

By Size:

           

Less than $200,000

   1%     1        1        1    3       1 %   1        1      1    5 

$200,000 - $1 million

   3         2        3        3    5       3   2        3      2    8 

$1 million - $5 million

   8         7    12     9        7    16       7   6    14     7      6    15 

$5 million - $10 million

   6         5        7        6    13       6   5    12     6      5    10 

$10 million - $25 million

   22         19    47     23        20    54       20   17    54     21      18    57 

Greater than $25 million

   60         66    23     57        63    9       63   69        62      68    5 

Total

   100 %    100    100     100        100    100       100 %   100    100     100      100    100 

By State:

                       

Ohio

   14%     16        15        16    4       14 %   15        14      15    7 

Florida

   8         8        8        7    5       8   8    12     8      8    6 

Michigan

   7         7        7        7    5       7   7        7      7    13 

Illinois

   7         6        7        7    9       7   6        7      6    9 

Indiana

   4         4        4        4    2       4   4        4      4    3 

Georgia

   4   5        4      5    2 

North Carolina

   4         3        4        4    -       3   3        3      3    1 

Tennessee

   3         3        3        3    1       3   3        3      3    8 

Kentucky

   3         3        3        3    2       2   2        3      3    1 

Pennsylvania

   3         3        3        3    4    

All other states

   47         47    66     46        46    68    

Other

   48   47    54     47      46    50 

Total

   100 %    100    100     100        100    100       100 %   100    100     100      100    100 

The Bancorp’snon-power producing energy and nonowner-occupied commercial real estate portfolios have been identified by the Bancorp as loans which it believes represent a higher level of risk compared to the rest of the Bancorp’s commercial loan portfolio due to economic or market conditions within the Bancorp’s key lending areas.

Due to the sensitivity of thenon-power producing energy portfolio to downward movements in oil prices, the Bancorp saw a migration into criticized classifications during 2015 through the second quarter of 2016. However, in the second half of 2016 and continuing into 2017, this portfolio stabilized with some signs of improvement, however, recent declines in oil prices could increase the volatility of the portfolio. The reserve-based energy loans that the Bancorp holds are senior secured loans with a borrowing base that isre-determined on a semi-annual basis. In addition to thenon-power producing energy lending exposure shown in Table 37, the Bancorp has approximately $192 million of operating lease assets, recorded in operating lease equipment in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets, that are leased to customers innon-power producing energy industries.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (continued)

 

 

The following tables provide an analysis of thenon-power producing energy loan portfolio:

TABLE 37:Non-Power Producing Energy Portfolio

As of June 30, 2017 ($ in millions)                                

Net Charge-offs for

June 30, 2017

    Pass   Criticized   Outstanding   Exposure   90 Days
Past Due
   Nonaccrual   Three Months
Ended
  Six Months
Ended

Reserve-based lending

  $            529    212      741        1,617     -    130      -  

Midstream

   298    -      298        891     -    -      -  

Oil field services

   137    71      208        307     -    35      -  

Oil and gas

   32    57      89        367     -    16      -  

Refining

   44    -      44        398     -    -      -  

Total

  $1,040    340      1,380        3,580     -    181      -  
TABLE 38:Non-Power Producing Energy Portfolio
As of June 30, 2016 ($ in millions)                                Net Charge-offs for
June 30, 2016
    Pass   Criticized   Outstanding   Exposure   90 Days
Past Due
   Nonaccrual   Three Months
Ended
  Six Months
Ended

Reserve-based lending

  $            220    466    686    1,171    -    125   -  

Midstream

   305    -    305    1,011    -    -   -  

Oil field services

   158    83    241    411    -    44   2  11 

Oil and gas

   76    92    168    505    -    22   -  

Refining

   120    -    120    651    -    -   -  

Total

  $879    641    1,520    3,749    -    191   2  11 

The following tables provide an analysis of nonowner-occupied commercial real estate loans by state (excluding loans held for sale):

TABLE 39:35: Nonowner-Occupied Commercial Real Estate (excluding loans held for sale)(a)

As of June 30, 2018 ($ in millions)           

Net Charge-offs for

June 30, 2018

 Outstanding       Exposure       90 Days  
    Past Due  
      Nonaccrual      Three Months
    Ended
      Six Months    
    Ended    

By State:

           

Ohio

 $            1,604      2,013   -     1     -     -     

Florida

  1,024      1,651   -     -     -     -     

Illinois

  693      903   -     -     -     -     

North Carolina

  683      892   -     -     -     -     

Michigan

  576      738   -     -     1     1     

Indiana

  501      763   -     -     -     -     

All other states

  2,652      4,649   -     2     -     1     

Total

 $7,733      11,609   -     3     1     2     

(a) Included in commercial mortgage loans and commercial construction loans in the Loans and Leases subsection of the Balance Sheet Analysis section of MD&A.

(a) Included in commercial mortgage loans and commercial construction loans in the Loans and Leases subsection of the Balance Sheet Analysis section of MD&A.

TABLE 36: Nonowner-Occupied Commercial Real Estate (excluding loans held for sale)(a)TABLE 36: Nonowner-Occupied Commercial Real Estate (excluding loans held for sale)(a)
As of June 30, 2017 ($ in millions)                      Net Charge-offs for
June 30, 2017
           

Net Charge-offs for

June 30, 2017

  Outstanding   Exposure   

90 Days

Past Due

   Nonaccrual   Three Months
Ended
  Six Months
Ended
 Outstanding     Exposure   

    90 Days  

    Past Due  

    Nonaccrual      Three Months
    Ended
    Six Months    
  Ended    

By State:

                       

Ohio

  $            1,562    1,974    -    3   5      8     $        1,562      1,974   -    3     5     8     

Florida

   949    1,501    -    1   -      -     949      1,501   -    1     -     -     

Illinois

   755    1,179    -    -   -      -     755      1,179   -    -     -     -     

North Carolina

 581      815   -    -     -     -     

Michigan

   570    741    -    1   -      -     570      741   -    1     -     -     

North Carolina

   581    815    -    -   -      -    

Indiana

   550    955    -    -   -      -     550      955   -    -     -     -     

All other states

   2,690    4,567    -    4   -      -     2,690      4,567   -    4     -     -     

Total

  $7,657    11,732    -    9   5      8     $            7,657      11,732   -    9     5     8     

(a) Included in commercial mortgage loans and commercial construction loans in the Loans and Leases subsection of the Balance Sheet Analysis section of MD&A.

TABLE 40: Nonowner-Occupied Commercial Real Estate (excluding loans held for sale)(a)
As of June 30, 2016 ($ in millions)                      Net Charge-offs for
June 30, 2016
  Outstanding   Exposure   

90 Days

Past Due

   Nonaccrual   Three Months
Ended
  Six Months
Ended

By State:

            

Ohio

  $            1,295     1,701    -    6   -      -    

Florida

   826     1,255    -    1   1      1    

Illinois

   719     1,156    -    1   -      -    

Michigan

   593     678    -    13   1      1    

North Carolina

   454     749    -    2   1      1    

Indiana

   261     442    -    -   -      -    

All other states

   2,715     4,761    -    4   3      3    

Total

  $6,863     10,742    -    27   6      6    
(a)

Included in commercial mortgage loans and commercial construction loans in the Loans and Leases subsection of the Balance Sheet Analysis section of MD&A.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (continued)

 

 

Consumer Portfolio

Consumer credit risk management utilizes a framework that encompasses consistent processes for identifying, assessing, managing, monitoring and reporting credit risk. These processes are supported by a credit risk governance structure that includes Board oversight, policies, risk limits and risk committees.

The Bancorp’s consumer portfolio is materially comprised of fourfive categories of loans: residential mortgage loans, home equity, loans, automobile loans, credit card and credit card.other consumer loans. The Bancorp has identified certain credit characteristics within these fourfive categories of loans which it believes represent a higher level of risk compared to the rest of the consumer loan portfolio. The Bancorp does not update LTV ratios for the consumer portfolio subsequent to origination except as part of thecharge-off process for real estate secured loans. Among consumer portfolios, legacy underwritten residential mortgage and brokered home equity portfolios exhibited the most stress during the past credit crisis. As of June 30, 2017,2018, consumer real estate loans, consisting of residential mortgage loans and home equity loans, originated from 2005 through 2008 represent approximately 15%14% of the consumer real estate portfolio. These loans accounted for 47% and 46%52% of total consumer real estate secured losses for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017, respectively.2018. Current loss rates in the residential mortgage and home equity portfolios are belowpre-crisis levels. In addition to the consumer real estate portfolio, credit risk management continues to closely monitor the automobile portfolio performance. The automobile market has exhibited industry-wide gradual loosening of credit standards such as lower FICOs, longer terms and higher LTVs. Fifth ThirdThe Bancorp has adjusted credit standards focused on improving risk-adjusted returns while maintaining credit risk tolerance. Fifth ThirdThe Bancorp actively manages the automobile portfolio through concentration limits, which mitigates credit risk through limiting the exposure to lower FICO scores, higher advance rates and extended term originations.

Residential mortgage portfolio

The Bancorp manages credit risk in the residential mortgage portfolio through underwriting guidelines that limit exposure to higher LTV ratios and lower FICO scores. Additionally, the portfolio is governed by concentration limits that ensure geographic, product and channel diversification. The Bancorp may also package and sell loans in the portfolio.

The Bancorp does not originate mortgage loans that permit customers to defer principal payments or make payments that are less than the accruing interest. The Bancorp originates both fixed-rate and ARM loans. Within the ARM portfolio, approximately $690$621 million of ARM loans will have rate resets during the next twelve months. Of these resets, 98%91% are expected to experience an increase in rate, with an average increase of approximately one half of a percent.

Certain residential mortgage products have contractual features that may increase credit exposure to the Bancorp in the event of a decline in housing values. These types of mortgage products offered by the Bancorp include loans with high LTV ratios, multiple loans on the same collateral that when combined result in a LTV greater than 80% and interest-only loans. The Bancorp has deemed residential mortgage loans with greater than 80% LTV ratios and no mortgage insurance as loans that represent a higher level of risk.

Portfolio residential mortgage loans from 2010 and later vintages represented 89%91% of the portfolio as of June 30, 20172018 and had a weighted-average LTV of 72%73% and a weighted-average origination FICO of 760.

The following table provides an analysis of the residential mortgage portfolio loans outstanding by LTV at origination as of:

 

TABLE 41: Residential Mortgage Portfolio Loans by LTV at Origination 
TABLE 37: Residential Mortgage Portfolio Loans by LTV at OriginationTABLE 37: Residential Mortgage Portfolio Loans by LTV at Origination 
   June 30, 2017    December 31, 2016    June 30, 2018      December 31, 2017 
($ in millions)   Outstanding   Weighted-
Average LTV
   Outstanding   Weighted-
Average LTV
    Outstanding   Weighted-
Average LTV
   Outstanding   Weighted-
Average LTV
 

LTV£ 80%

 $   11,697        66.2 %  $   11,412        65.9%   $   11,692        66.6 %   $   11,767        66.4%  

LTV > 80%, with mortgage insurance(a)

    1,286        93.3          1,284        93.3          1,897        94.8           1,890        94.8     

LTV > 80%, no mortgage insurance

    2,477        95.6          2,355        95.7          2,051        94.7            1,934        94.7     

Total

 $   15,460        73.4 %  $   15,051        73.2%   $   15,640        74.1 %   $   15,591         73.7%  
(a)

Includes loans with both borrower and lender paid mortgage insurance.

The following tables provide an analysis of the residential mortgage portfolio loans outstanding with a greater than 80% LTV ratio and no mortgage insurance:

 

TABLE 42: Residential Mortgage Portfolio Loans, LTV Greater than 80%, No Mortgage Insurance      
As of June 30, 2017 ($ in millions)                 Net Charge-offs for June 30, 2017 
TABLE 38: Residential Mortgage Portfolio Loans, LTV Greater than 80%, No Mortgage InsuranceTABLE 38: Residential Mortgage Portfolio Loans, LTV Greater than 80%, No Mortgage Insurance      
As of June 30, 2018 ($ in millions)                 Net Charge-offs for June 30, 2018 
        Outstanding     90 Days  
Past Due  
   Nonaccrual     Three Months
Ended  
   Six Months
Ended  
         Outstanding     90 Days  
Past Due  
   Nonaccrual     Three Months
Ended  
   Six Months
Ended  
 

By State:

                    

Ohio

  $561    2    5    1        1       $456    3    3    -        -     

Illinois

   511    -    -    -        -        408    -    2    -        -     

Florida

   349    1    2    -        1        297    2    3    -        -     

Michigan

   278    1    1    -        -        228    1    1    -        -     

Indiana

   165    1    1    -        -        154    -    1    -        -     

North Carolina

   117    -    1    -        -        99    -    1    -        -     

Kentucky

   98    1    -    -        -        90    1    -    -        -     

All other states

   398    -    -    -        -        319    2    1    1        1     

Total

  $2,477    6    10    1        2       $2,051    9    12    1        1     

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (continued)

 

 

TABLE 43: Residential Mortgage Portfolio Loans, LTV Greater than 80%, No Mortgage Insurance

As of June 30, 2016 ($ in millions)                 Net Charge-offs for June 30, 2016

TABLE 39: Residential Mortgage Portfolio Loans, LTV Greater than 80%, No Mortgage Insurance

TABLE 39: Residential Mortgage Portfolio Loans, LTV Greater than 80%, No Mortgage Insurance

As of June 30, 2017 ($ in millions)                 Net Charge-offs for June 30, 2017
  Outstanding     

90 Days  

Past Due  

   Nonaccrual     

Three Months

Ended

   

Six Months

Ended

  Outstanding     90 Days  
Past Due  
   Nonaccrual     Three Months
Ended
   Six Months
Ended

By State:

                    

Ohio

  $                  561    1    4    1     $                  561    2    5    1   

Illinois

   416    -    1    -      511    -    -    -   

Florida

   307    1    3    -      349    1    2    -   

Michigan

   290    1    1    -      278    1    1    -   

Indiana

   159    -    1    -      165    1    1    -   

North Carolina

   115    -    1    -      117    -    1    -   

Kentucky

   89    1    -    -      98    1    -    -   

All other states

   357    1    1    -      398    -    -    -   

Total

  $2,294    5    12    1     $2,477    6    10    1   

Home equity portfolio

The Bancorp’s home equity portfolio is primarily comprised of home equity lines of credit. Beginning in the first quarter of 2013, the Bancorp’s newly originated home equity lines of credit have a10-year interest-only draw period followed by a20-year amortization period. The home equity line of credit previously offered by the Bancorp was a revolving facility with a20-year term, minimum payments of interest-only and a balloon payment of principal at maturity. Peak maturity years for the balloon home equity lines of credit are 2025 to 2028 and approximately 26% of the balances mature before 2025. Less than 2% of this population is expected to mature by 2019.

The ALLL provides coverage for probable and estimable losses in the home equity portfolio. The allowance attributable to the portion of the home equity portfolio that has not been restructured in a TDR is calculated on a pooled basis with senior lien and junior lien categories segmented in the determination of the probable credit losses in the home equity portfolio. The modeled loss factor for the home equity portfolio is based on the trailing twelve month historical loss rate for each category, as adjusted for certain prescriptive loss rate factors and certain qualitative adjustment factors to reflect risks associated with current conditions and trends. The prescriptive loss rate factors include adjustments for delinquency trends, LTV trends and refreshed FICO score trends. The qualitative factors include adjustments for changes in policies or procedures in underwriting, monitoring or collections, economic conditions, portfolio mix, lending and risk management personnel, results of internal audit and quality control reviews, collateral values and geographic concentrations. The Bancorp considers home price index trends when determining the collateral value qualitative factor.

The home equity portfolio is managed in two primary groups: loans outstanding with a combined LTV greater than 80% and those loans with a LTV of 80% or less based upon appraisals at origination. The carrying value of the greater than 80% LTV home equityFor additional information on these loans, refer to Table 41 and 80% or less LTV home equity loans were $2.2 billion and $5.1 billion, respectively, as of June 30, 2017.Table 42. Of the total $7.3$6.6 billion of outstanding home equity loans:

  

87%88% reside within the Bancorp’s Midwest footprint of Ohio, Michigan, Kentucky, Indiana and Illinois as of June 30, 2017;2018;

  

37% are in senior lien positions and 63% are in junior lien positions at June 30, 2017;2018;

  

79%81% ofnon-delinquent borrowers made at least one payment greater than the minimum payment during the three months ended June 30, 2017;2018; and

  

The portfolio had an average refreshedFICO score of 744745 at June 30, 2017.2018.

The Bancorp actively manages lines of credit and makes adjustments in lending limits when it believes it is necessary based on FICO score deterioration and property devaluation. The Bancorp does not routinely obtain appraisals on performing loans to update LTV ratios after origination. However, the Bancorp monitors the local housing markets by reviewing various home price indices and incorporates the impact of the changing market conditions in its ongoing credit monitoring processes. For junior lien home equity loans which become 60 days or more past due, the Bancorp tracks the performance of the senior lien loans in which the Bancorp is the servicer and utilizes consumer credit bureau attributes to monitor the status of the senior lien loans that the Bancorp does not service. If the senior lien loan is found to be 120 days or more past due, the junior lien home equity loan is placed on nonaccrual status unless both loans are well-secured and in the process of collection. Additionally, if the junior lien home equity loan becomes 120 days or more past due and the senior lien loan is also 120 days or more past due, the junior lien home equity loan is assessed forcharge-off. Refer to the Analysis of Nonperforming Assets subsection of the Risk Management section of MD&A for more information.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (continued)

 

 

The following table provides an analysis of home equity portfolio loans outstanding disaggregated based upon refreshed FICO score as of:

 

TABLE 44: Home Equity Portfolio Loans Outstanding by Refreshed FICO Score 
TABLE 40: Home Equity Portfolio Loans Outstanding by Refreshed FICO ScoreTABLE 40: Home Equity Portfolio Loans Outstanding by Refreshed FICO Score 
                     June 30, 2017                            December 31, 2016                        June 30, 2018                       December 31, 2017         
($ in millions)            Outstanding       % of Total            Outstanding % of Total                  Outstanding       % of Total         Outstanding % of Total      

Senior Liens:

             

FICO£ 659

 

$

  251           3 %   

$

 262      3 %    $              231              4 %   $              246          4 % 

FICO660-719

   399           6         424      6        330              5        358          5     

FICO³ 720

  2,025           28       2,112      27       1,851              28       1,976          28     

Total senior liens

   2,675           37         2,798      36        2,412              37        2,580          37     

Junior Liens:

             

FICO£ 659

   579           8         633      8        500              7        541          8     

FICO660-719

   917           12         975      13        785              12        853          12     

FICO³ 720

  3,130           43       3,289      43       2,902              44       3,040          43     

Total junior liens

  4,626           63       4,897      64       4,187              63       4,434          63     

Total

 $  7,301           100 %  $ 7,695      100 %   $            6,599              100 %  $           7,014          100 % 

The Bancorp believes that home equity portfolio loans with a greater than 80% combined LTV ratio present a higher level of risk. The following table provides an analysis of the home equity portfolio loans outstanding in a senior and junior lien position by LTV at origination as of:origination:

 

TABLE 45: Home Equity Portfolio Loans Outstanding by LTV at Origination 
TABLE 41: Home Equity Portfolio Loans Outstanding by LTV at OriginationTABLE 41: Home Equity Portfolio Loans Outstanding by LTV at Origination 
                     June 30, 2018                               December 31, 2017         
                     June 30, 2017                            December 31, 2016         
($ in millions)            Outstanding      Weighted-
    Average LTV 
       Outstanding 

Weighted-    

Average LTV    

             Outstanding       

Weighted-     

Average LTV     

    Outstanding 

Weighted-    

Average LTV    

 

Senior Liens:

             

LTV£ 80%

 

$

  2,348           55.1 %   

$

 2,454      55.1 %    $            2,109              54.8 %   $          2,266      54.9 % 

LTV > 80%

  327           88.9       344      89.0       303              88.9       314      88.9     

Total senior liens

   2,675           59.5         2,798      59.5        2,412              59.3        2,580      59.3     

Junior Liens:

             

LTV£ 80%

   2,720           67.6         2,892      67.6        2,441              67.4        2,603      67.5     

LTV > 80%

  1,906           90.5       2,005      90.7       1,746              90.3       1,831      90.4     

Total junior liens

  4,626           78.5       4,897      78.7       4,187              78.2       4,434      78.3     

Total

 $  7,301           71.1 %  $ 7,695      71.2 %   $            6,599              70.9 %  $          7,014      70.9 % 

The following tables provide an analysis of home equity portfolio loans by state with a combined LTV greater than 80%:

 

TABLE 46: Home Equity Portfolio Loans Outstanding with a LTV Greater than 80% 
As of June 30, 2017 ($ in millions)             Net Charge-offs for June 30, 2017 
TABLE 42: Home Equity Portfolio Loans Outstanding with a LTV Greater than 80%TABLE 42: Home Equity Portfolio Loans Outstanding with a LTV Greater than 80% 
As of June 30, 2018 ($ in millions)              Net Charge-offs for June 30, 2018 
     Outstanding   Exposure 

90 Days    

Past Due    

 Nonaccrual   Three Months
Ended
 

Six Months

Ended

   Outstanding Exposure 90 Days    
Past Due    
 Nonaccrual Three Months
Ended
 Six Months
Ended
 

By State:

             

Ohio

 $1,031   1,870   -       7   1   2    $            1,037   1,994   -       8   1   2 

Michigan

  393   616   -       5   -   1    325   531   -       4   -   1 

Illinois

  246   378   -       4   1   1    214   339   -       3   -   1 

Indiana

  169   282   -       2   -   1    143   247   -       3   -   - 

Kentucky

  156   276   -       2   -   1    130   243   -       2   -   - 

Florida

  73   105   -       2   -   -    65   93   -       2   -   - 

All other states

  165   236   -       3   -   -    135   202   -       3   -   - 

Total

 $2,233   3,763   -       25   2   6    $            2,049   3,649   -       25   1   4 

 

TABLE 47: Home Equity Portfolio Loans Outstanding with a LTV Greater than 80% 
As of June 30, 2016 ($ in millions)             Net Charge-offs for June 30, 2016 
TABLE 43: Home Equity Portfolio Loans Outstanding with a LTV Greater than 80%TABLE 43: Home Equity Portfolio Loans Outstanding with a LTV Greater than 80% 
As of June 30, 2017 ($ in millions)              Net Charge-offs for June 30, 2017 
     Outstanding   Exposure 90 Days    
Past Due    
 Nonaccrual   Three Months
Ended
 Six Months
Ended
   Outstanding Exposure 90 Days    
Past Due    
 Nonaccrual Three Months
Ended
 Six Months
Ended
 

By State:

             

Ohio

 $1,046  1,813   -      10  1  3    $            1,031  1,870   -      7  1  2 

Michigan

 477  723   -      6  1  1    393  616   -      5   -  1 

Illinois

 285  430   -      4  1  1    246  378   -      4  1  1 

Indiana

 202  327   -      3   -  1    169  282   -      2   -  1 

Kentucky

 190  320   -      2   -   -    156  276   -      2   -  1 

Florida

 88  122   -      2   -   -    73  105   -      2   -   - 

All other states

 204  285   -      4   -  1    165  236   -      3   -   - 

Total

 $2,492  4,020   -      31  3  7    $            2,233  3,763   -      25  2  6 

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (continued)

 

 

Automobile portfolio

The Bancorp’s automobile portfolio balances have declined since December 31, 20162017 as payoffs exceeded new loan production due to a strategic shift focusing on improving risk-adjusted returns. Additionally, the concentration of lower FICO (<690) origination balances remained within targeted credit risk tolerance during the six months ended June 30, 2017.2018. All concentration and guideline changes are monitored monthly to ensure alignment with original credit performance and return projections.

The following table provides an analysis of automobile portfolio loans outstanding disaggregated based upon FICO score as of:

 

TABLE 48: Automobile Portfolio Loans Outstanding by FICO Score at Origination
TABLE 44: Automobile Portfolio Loans Outstanding by FICO Score at OriginationTABLE 44: Automobile Portfolio Loans Outstanding by FICO Score at Origination
              June 30, 2017                      December 31, 2016                         June 30, 2018                         December 31, 2017          
($ in millions) Outstanding         % of Total         Outstanding         % of Total         Outstanding         % of Total                    Outstanding         % of Total        

FICO£ 690

 $          1,598       17 %    $          1,714  17 %   $          1,545       17 %    $          1,563      17 %  

FICO > 690

  7,720       83        8,269  83        7,393       83        7,549      83      

Total

 $9,318       100 %   $9,983  100 %   $8,938       100 %   $          9,112      100 %  

The automobile portfolio is characterized by direct and indirect lending products to consumers. As of June 30, 2017, 46%2018, 44% of the automobile loan portfolio is comprised of loans collateralized by new automobiles. It is a common industry practice to advance on automobile loans an amount in excess of the automobile value due to the inclusion of negative equitytrade-in, maintenance/warranty products, taxes, title and other fees paid at closing. The Bancorp monitors its exposure to these higher risk loans.

The following table provides an analysis of automobile portfolio loans outstanding by LTV at origination as of:

 

TABLE 49: Automobile Portfolio Loans Outstanding by LTV at Origination
TABLE 45: Automobile Portfolio Loans Outstanding by LTV at OriginationTABLE 45: Automobile Portfolio Loans Outstanding by LTV at Origination
            June 30, 2017                      December 31, 2016                            June 30, 2018                             December 31, 2017          
($ in millions) Outstanding 

Weighted-    

  Average LTV      

    Outstanding 

     Weighted-     

     Average LTV      

 Outstanding   

    Weighted-    

    Average LTV    

            Outstanding 

    Weighted-      

    Average LTV      

LTV£ 100%

 $          6,070       82.1 %    $          6,637  82.0 %    $              5,606         82.3 %  $          5,814      82.1 %  

LTV > 100%

  3,248       112.0        3,346  111.7        3,332         112.7      3,298      112.4      

Total

 $9,318       93.0 %   $9,983  92.4 %    $              8,938         94.1 % $          9,112      93.5 %  

The following table provides an analysis of the Bancorp’s automobile portfolio loans with a LTV at origination greater than 100%:

 

TABLE 50: Automobile Portfolio Loans Outstanding with a LTV Greater than 100% 
TABLE 46: Automobile Portfolio Loans Outstanding with a LTV Greater than 100%TABLE 46: Automobile Portfolio Loans Outstanding with a LTV Greater than 100% 
As of ($ in millions)                 Net Charge-offs for the                  Net Charge-offs for the 
  Outstanding   90 Days Past Due
and Accruing
   Nonaccrual   Three Months
Ended
   Six Months
Ended
   Outstanding   90 Days Past Due
and Accruing
   Nonaccrual   Three Months
Ended
   Six Months
Ended
 

June 30, 2018

   $              3,332    6    1    5    13 

June 30, 2017

  $3,248    4    1    4    12    3,248    4    1    4    12 

June 30, 2016

   3,492    4    2    4    10 

Credit card portfolio

The credit card portfolio consists of predominately prime accounts with 97% of loan balances existing within the Bancorp’s footprint as of both June 30, 20172018 and December 31, 2016.2017. At June 30, 20172018 and December 31, 2016, 77%2017, 74% and 78%76%, respectively, of the outstanding balances were originated through branch basedbranch-based relationships with the remainder coming from direct mail campaigns and online acquisitions.

The following table provides an analysis of credit card portfolio loans outstanding disaggregated based upon FICO score as of:

 

TABLE 51: Credit Card Portfolio Loans Outstanding by FICO Score at Origination
TABLE 47: Credit Card Portfolio Loans Outstanding by FICO Score at OriginationTABLE 47: Credit Card Portfolio Loans Outstanding by FICO Score at Origination
              June 30, 2017                      December 31, 2016                       June 30, 2018                        December 31, 2017           
($ in millions) Outstanding         % of Total           Outstanding         % of Total         Outstanding         % of Total           Outstanding       % of Total       

FICO£ 659

 $49       2 %    $45  2 %   $65       3 %    $                 61           3 %  

FICO660-719

  513       24         521  23        605       27         581           25      

FICO³ 720

  1,555       74        1,671  75        1,600       70        1,657           72      

Total

 $          2,117       100 %   $          2,237  100 %   $          2,270       100 %   $            2,299           100 %  

European ExposureOther consumer portfolio loans

The other consumer portfolio loans are comprised of secured and unsecured loans originated through the Bancorp’s branch network as well aspoint-of-sale loans originated in connection with third-party financial technology companies. Outstanding balances for other consumer loans increased approximately $423 million, or 27%, from December 31, 2017 primarily due to an increase in originations in connection with third-party financial technology companies. Additionally, the Bancorp has no direct sovereign exposure to any European governmentapproximately $275 million in unfunded commitments associated with loans originated in connection with third-party financial technology companies as of June 30, 2017. In providing services to our customers,2018. Fifth Third closely monitors the Bancorp routinely enters intocredit performance of thesepoint-of-sale loans which is impacted by the credit loss protection coverage provided by the third-party financial transactions with foreign domiciled and U.S. subsidiaries of foreign businesses as well as foreign financial institutions. These financial transactions are in the form of loans, loan commitments, letters of credit, derivatives, guarantees, banker’s acceptances and securities. The Bancorp’s risk appetite for foreign country exposure is managed by having established country exposure limits. The Bancorp’s total exposure to European domiciled or owned businesses and European financial institutions was $3.0 billion and funded exposure was $1.6 billion as of June 30, 2017. Additionally, the Bancorp was within its established country exposure limits for all European countries.technology companies.

The Bancorp has been closely monitoring the Brexit situation and its potential impact on the Bancorp. The Bancorp’s United Kingdom exposure is shown in the following table.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (continued)

 

 

The following table provides detail about the Bancorp’s exposure to all European domiciled and U.S. subsidiariesan analysis of European businessesother consumer portfolio loans outstanding by product type at origination as well as European financial institutions as of June 30, 2017:of:

TABLE 48: Other Consumer Portfolio Loans Outstanding by Product Type at Origination    

TABLE 52: European Exposure 
     Sovereigns     Financial Institutions     Non-Financial
Institutions
     Total   
($ in millions)     Total
Exposure(a)
   Funded
Exposure
     Total
  Exposure(a)
   Funded
Exposure
     Total
  Exposure(a)
   Funded
Exposure
     Total 
  Exposure(a) 
   Funded  
Exposure  
 

Peripheral Europe(b)

 $   -    -      80    38      116    66      196    104 

Other Eurozone(c)

      -    -      337    115      1,387    819      1,724    934 

Total Eurozone

 $   -    -      417    153      1,503    885      1,920    1,038 

United Kingdom

   -    -      53    53      898    477      951    530 

Other Europe(d)

      -    -      2    2      125    46      127    48 

Total Europe

 $   -    -      472    208      2,526    1,408      2,998    1,616 
(a)

Total exposure includes funded exposure and unfunded commitments.

(b)

Peripheral Europe includes Greece, Ireland, Italy, Portugal and Spain.

(c)

Eurozone includes countries participating in the European common currency (Euro).

(d)

Other Europe includes European countries not part of the Eurozone (primarily Switzerland, Norway and Sweden).

                June 30, 2018                           December 31, 2017         
($ in millions)    Outstanding   % of Total         Outstanding   % of Total 

Unsecured

 $  495        25   $  461        30 

Other secured

   494        25      482        31  

Point-of-sale

    993        50          616        39  

Total

 $  1,982        100      $  1,559        100 

Analysis of Nonperforming Assets

Nonperforming assets include nonaccrual loans and leases for which ultimate collectability of the full amount of the principal and/or interest is uncertain; restructured commercial and credit card loans which have not yet met the requirements to be classified as a performing asset; restructured consumer loans which are 90 days past due based on the restructured terms unless the loan is both well-secured and in the process of collection; and certain other assets, including OREO and other repossessed property. A summary of nonperforming assets is included in Table 53.49. For further information on the Bancorp’s policies related to accounting for delinquent and nonperforming loans and leases, refer to the Nonaccrual Loans and Leases section of Note 1 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in the Bancorp’s Annual Report on Form10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016.2017.

Nonperforming assets were $670$503 million at June 30, 20172018 compared to $751$495 million at December 31, 2016.2017. At June 30, 2017, $82018, $23 million of nonaccrual loans were held for sale, compared to $13$6 million at December 31, 2016.2017.

Nonperforming portfolio assets as a percent of portfolio loans and leases and OREO were 0.72%0.52% as of June 30, 20172018 compared to 0.80%0.53% as of December 31, 2016.2017. Nonaccrual loans and leases secured by real estate were 23%27% of nonaccrual loans and leases as of June 30, 20172018 compared to 25%33% as of December 31, 2016.2017.

Commercial portfolio nonaccrual loans and leases were $485$305 million at June 30, 2017,2018, a decrease of $38$1 million from December 31, 2016.2017. Consumer portfolio nonaccrual loans and leases were $129$132 million at June 30, 2017, a decrease2018, an increase of $8$1 million from December 31, 2016.2017. Refer to Tables 5450 and 5551 for rollforwards of the portfolio nonaccrual loans and leases.

OREO and other repossessed property was $48$43 million at June 30, 2017,2018, compared to $78$52 million at December 31, 2016.2017. The Bancorp recognized $1 million and $6 million in losses on the sale or write-down of OREO properties for both the three months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017 and 2016, respectively,$4 million and $5 million and $9 million in losses on the sale or write-down of OREO properties for the six months ended June 30, 20172018 and 2016,2017, respectively.

For the three and six months ended June 30, 2017,2018, approximately $9$7 million and $19$15 million, respectively, of interest income would have been recognized if the nonaccrual and renegotiated loans and leases on nonaccrual status had been current in accordance with their original terms. For the three and six months ended June 30, 20162017 approximately $11$9 million and $22$19 million, respectively, of interest income would have been recognized. Although these values help demonstrate the costs of carrying nonaccrual credits, the Bancorp does not expect to recover the full amount of interest as nonaccrual loans and leases are generally carried below their principal balance.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (continued)

 

 

TABLE 53:49: Summary of Nonperforming Assets and Delinquent Loans

As of ($ in millions)          June 30, 2017             December 31, 2016                June 30, 2018             December 31, 2017      

Nonaccrual portfolio loans and leases:

      

Commercial and industrial loans

 $ 225         302                 $ 99      144               

Commercial mortgage loans

  15         27                  8      12               

Commercial leases

  1         2                  25      -               

Residential mortgage loans

  19         17                  13      17               

Home equity

  52         55                  54      56               

Automobile loans

  3      -               

Other consumer loans

  1      -               

Nonaccrual portfolio restructured loans and leases:

      

Commercial and industrial loans

  222         176                  164      132               

Commercial mortgage loans(c)

  20         14                

Commercial mortgage loans

  5      14               

Commercial leases

  2         2                  4      4               

Residential mortgage loans

  13         17                  15      13               

Home equity

  18         18                  17      18               

Automobile loans

  1         2                  2      1               

Credit card

 26         28                 27      26               

Total nonaccrual portfolio loans and leases(b)

  614         660                  437      437               

OREO and other repossessed property

 48         78                 43      52               

Total nonperforming portfolio assets

  662         738                  480      489               

Nonaccrual loans held for sale

  7         4                  5      5               

Nonaccrual restructured loans held for sale

 1         9                 18      1               

Total nonperforming assets

 $ 670         751                 $ 503      495               

Loans and leases 90 days past due and still accruing

   

Total portfolio loans 90 days past due and still accruing

   

Commercial and industrial loans

 $ 3         4                 $ 4      3               

Residential mortgage loans(a)

  45         49                  44      57               

Automobile loans

  7         9                  10      10               

Credit card

 20         22                 31      27               

Total loans and leases 90 days past due and still accruing

 $ 75         84                

Total portfolio loans 90 days past due and still accruing

 $ 89      97               

Nonperforming portfolio assets as a percent of portfolio loans and leases and OREO

  0.72    % 0.80                  0.52 % 0.53             

ALLL as a percent of nonperforming portfolio assets

 185         170                 224      245             
(a)

Information for all periods presented excludes advances made pursuant to servicing agreements for GNMA mortgage pools whose repayments are insured by the FHA or guaranteed by the VA. These advances 90 days or more past due were$179237as ofJune 30, 20172018and $202$290 as of December 31, 2016.2017. The Bancorp recognized losses of$1and$3 on these insured or guaranteed loans for both the three and six months endedJune 30, 20172018and 2016, respectively.2017.

(b)

Includes$4and $3 of nonaccrual government insured commercial loans whose repayments are insured by the SBA at bothJune 30, 20172018 and December 31, 2016 and2017, respectively, of which$12 ofand $3 were restructured nonaccrual government insured commercial loans at bothJune 30, 20172018and December 31, 2016.

(c)

Excludes$19of restructured nonaccrual loans at bothJune 30, 2017, and December 31, 2016 associated with a consolidated VIE in which the Bancorp has no continuing credit risk due to the risk being assumed by a third party. respectively.

The following tables provide a rollforward of portfolio nonaccrual loans and leases, by portfolio segment:

TABLE 50: Rollforward of Portfolio Nonaccrual Loans and Leases

TABLE 54: Rollforward of Portfolio Nonaccrual Loans and Leases 

 
For the six months ended June 30, 2018 ($ in millions)    Commercial    Residential
  Mortgage  
   Consumer        Total     

Balance, beginning of period

 

$

 306    30     101    437      

Transfers to nonaccrual status

  172    19     70    261      

Transfers to accrual status

     (12)    (30)   (42)     

Transfers to held for sale

  (25)          (25)     

Loan paydowns/payoffs

  (88)   (3)    (16)   (107)     

Transfers to OREO

  (2)   (5)    (4)   (11)     

Charge-offs

  (89)   (1)    (17)   (107)     

Draws/other extensions of credit

 31           31      

Balance, end of period

 $ 305    28     104    437      
TABLE 51: Rollforward of Portfolio Nonaccrual Loans and LeasesTABLE 51: Rollforward of Portfolio Nonaccrual Loans and Leases

 

 

 
For the six months ended June 30, 2017 ($ in millions)      Commercial   Residential
  Mortgage  
  Consumer              Total           Commercial    Residential  
Mortgage
     Consumer          Total     

Balance, beginning of period

 

$

 523   34    103    660       $ 523    34     103   660      

Transfers to nonaccrual status

  212   24    61    297        212    24     61   297      

Transfers to accrual status

  (13)  (12)   (26)   (51)       (13)   (12)    (26)  (51)     

Transfers to held for sale

  (4)        (4)       (13)         (13)     

Loans sold from portfolio

  (9)        (9)     

Loan paydowns/payoffs

  (149)  (7)   (16)   (172)       (149)   (7)    (16)  (172)     

Transfers to OREO

  (2)  (5)   (3)   (10)       (2)   (5)    (3)  (10)     

Charge-offs

  (87)  (2)   (22)   (111)       (87)   (2)    (22)  (111)     

Draws/other extensions of credit

 14         14       14          14      

Balance, end of period

 $ 485   32    97    614       $ 485    32     97   614      

TABLE 55: Rollforward of Portfolio Nonaccrual Loans and Leases

 

 
For the six months ended June 30, 2016 ($ in millions)    Commercial Residential
Mortgage
 Consumer       Total 

Balance, beginning of period

 

$

 341  51   114   506      

Transfers to nonaccrual status

  411  31   80   522      

Transfers to accrual status

  (9) (26)  (38)  (73)     

Transfers to held for sale

  (3)       (3)     

Loans sold from portfolio

  (8)       (8)     

Loan paydowns/payoffs

  (91) (4)  (16)  (111)     

Transfers to OREO

  (4) (7)  (6)  (17)     

Charge-offs

  (112) (2)  (23)  (137)     

Draws/other extensions of credit

 14        14      

Balance, end of period

 $ 539  43   111   693      

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (continued)

 

 

Troubled Debt Restructurings

If a borrower is experiencing financial difficulty, the Bancorp may consider, in certain circumstances, modifying the terms of their loan to maximize collection of amounts due. Typically, these modifications reduce the loan interest rate, extend the loan term, reduce the accrued interest or in limited circumstances, reduce the principal balance of the loan. These modifications are classified as TDRs.

At the time of modification, the Bancorp maintains certain consumer loan TDRs (including residential mortgage loans, home equity loans, and other consumer loans) on accrual status, provided there is reasonable assurance of repayment and performance according to the modified terms based upon a current, well-documented credit evaluation. Commercial loans modified as part of a TDR are maintained on accrual status provided there is a sustained payment history of six months or greater prior to the modification in accordance with the modified terms and all remaining contractual payments under the modified terms are reasonably assured of collection. TDRs of commercial loans and credit card loans that do not have a sustained payment history of six months or greater in accordance with the modified terms remain on nonaccrual status until asix-month payment history is sustained.

Consumer restructured loans on accrual status totaled $933 million$1.0 billion and $958$927 million at June 30, 20172018 and December 31, 2016,2017, respectively. As of June 30, 2017,2018, the percent of restructured residential mortgage loans, home equity loans and credit card loans that were past due 30 days or more from their modified terms were 27%26%, 11% and 30%35%, respectively.

The following tables summarize portfolio TDRs by loan type and delinquency status:

 

TABLE 56: Accruing and Nonaccruing Portfolio TDRs 
    Accruing       
As of June 30, 2017 ($ in millions)        Current    30-89 Days  
Past Due
  90 Days or
  More Past Due  
  Nonaccruing      Total     

Commercial loans(b)(c)

 

$

  224   -             -             244           468  

Residential mortgage loans(a)

   478   46             115             13           652  

Home equity

   249   14             -             18           281  

Automobile loans

   10   -             -             1           11  

Credit card

    18   3             -             26           47  

Total

 

$

  979   63             115             302           1,459  
(a)

Information includes advances made pursuant to servicing agreements for GNMA mortgage pools whose repayments are insured by the FHA or guaranteed by the VA. As ofJune 30, 2017, these advances represented$272 of current loans,$39 of30-89 days past due loans and$100 of 90 days or more past due loans.

(b)

As ofJune 30, 2017, excludes$7of restructured accruing loans and$19 of restructured nonaccrual loans associated with a consolidated VIE in which the Bancorp has no continuing credit risk due to the risk being assumed by a third party.

(c)

Excludes restructured nonaccrual loans held for sale.

TABLE 57: Accruing and Nonaccruing Portfolio TDRs 
TABLE 52: Accruing and Nonaccruing Portfolio TDRsTABLE 52: Accruing and Nonaccruing Portfolio TDRs 
 Accruing       Accruing      
As of December 31, 2016 ($ in millions)        Current   30-89 Days  
Past Due
 90 Days or
  More Past Due  
   Nonaccruing       Total     

Commercial loans(b)(c)

 $ 319  3             -            192          514  
As of June 30, 2018 ($ in millions)    Current     30-89 Days    
Past Due
 90 Days or
  More Past Due  
 Nonaccruing     Total     

Commercial loans(b)

 

$

  103   1             -             173           277  

Residential mortgage loans(a)

  458  56            121            17          652     583   44             146             15           788  

Home equity

  269  18             -            18          305     217   10             -             17           244  

Automobile loans

  12   -             -            2          14     6   -             -             2            

Credit card

   20  4             -            28          52      15   3             -             27           45  

Total

 $ 1,078  81            121            257          1,537   

$

  924   58             146             234           1,362  

(a) Information includes advances made pursuant to servicing agreements for GNMA mortgage pools whose repayments are insured by the FHA or guaranteed by the VA. As ofJune 30, 2018, these advances represented$353 of current loans,$37 of30-89 days past due loans and$124 of 90 days or more past due loans.

(b) Excludes restructured nonaccrual loans held for sale.

(a) Information includes advances made pursuant to servicing agreements for GNMA mortgage pools whose repayments are insured by the FHA or guaranteed by the VA. As ofJune 30, 2018, these advances represented$353 of current loans,$37 of30-89 days past due loans and$124 of 90 days or more past due loans.

(b) Excludes restructured nonaccrual loans held for sale.

    

    

TABLE 53: Accruing and Nonaccruing Portfolio TDRsTABLE 53: Accruing and Nonaccruing Portfolio TDRs 
  Accruing      
As of December 31, 2017 ($ in millions)    Current     30-89 Days    
Past Due
 90 Days or
  More Past Due  
   Nonaccruing       Total     

Commercial loans(b)

 

$

 249   -             -            150          399  

Residential mortgage loans(a)

  478  52            122            13          665  

Home equity

  236  12             -            18          266  

Automobile loans

  8   -             -            1           

Credit card

   16  3             -            26          45  

Total

 

$

 987  67            122            208          1,384  
(a)

Information includes advances made pursuant to servicing agreements for GNMA mortgage pools whose repayments are insured by the FHA or guaranteed by the VA. As of December 31, 2016,2017, these advances represented $230$282 of current loans, $46$40 of30-89 days past due loans and $107$108 of 90 days or more past due loans.

(b)

As of December 31, 2016, excludes $7 of restructured accruing loans and $19 of restructured nonaccrual loans associated with a consolidated VIE in which the Bancorp has no continuing credit risk due to the risk being assumed by a third party.

(c)

Excludes restructured nonaccrual loans held for sale.

Analysis of Net Loan Charge-offs

Net charge-offs were 2841 bps and 3728 bps of average portfolio loans and leases for the three months ended June 30, 20172018 and 2016,2017, respectively, and were 3438 bps and 3934 bps of average portfolio loans and leases for the six months ended June 30, 20172018 and 2016,2017, respectively. Table 5854 provides a summary of credit loss experience and net charge-offs as a percent of average portfolio loans and leases outstanding by loan category.

The ratio of commercial loan and lease net charge-offs to average portfolio commercial loans and leases decreasedincreased to 34 bps and 27 bps during the three and six months ended June 30, 2018, respectively, compared to 17 bps and 23 bps during the three and six months ended June 30, 2017, respectively, compared to 32 bps and 35 bps during the three and six months ended June 30, 2016, respectively. The decreasesincreases for both the three and six months ended June 30, 20172018 were driven by decreasesprimarily due to increases in net charge-offs on commercial and industrial loans. Bothloans of $29 million and $22 million during the three and six months ended June 30, 2017 included an increase of $12 million in recoveries of commercial and industrial loans. Additionally,2018, respectively, compared to the six months ended June 30, 2016 included $11 million of charge-offssame period in the energy portfolio related to oil field services loans, included in net charge-offs on commercial and industrial loans.prior year.

Consumer loan and lease net charge-offs as a percent of average portfolio consumer loans and leases were 4652 bps and 5156 bps during the three and six months ended June 30, 2017,2018, respectively, compared to 4546 bps and 4651 bps for the three and six months ended June 30, 2016,2017, respectively. Consumer net charge-offs decreased $1 million and increased $6 millionThe increases for both the three and six months ended June 30, 2017,2018 were primarily due to increases in net charge-offs on credit cards of $4 million and $9 million during the three and six months ended June 30, 2018, respectively, compared to the same periodsperiod in the prior year. Refer to Table 58 for a summary of net charge-offs by consumer loan category.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (continued)

 

 

TABLE 58: Summary of Credit Loss Experience                     
TABLE 54: Summary of Credit Loss Experience                  
  For the three months ended
June 30,
      For the six months ended
June 30,
     For the three months ended
June 30,
 For the six months ended
June 30,
 
($ in millions)        2017 2016             2017 2016           2018 2017        2018   2017   

Lossescharged-off:

       ��     

Commercial and industrial loans

 $  (34 (43)         (72 (94)      $    (51 (34)       (83   (72)     

Commercial mortgage loans

   (6 (7)         (12 (15)        (3 (6)       (4   (12)     

Commercial leases

   (1 (1)         (2 (3)        -  (1)       -    (2)     

Residential mortgage loans

   (4 (5)         (10 (10)        (4 (4)       (7   (10)     

Home equity

   (9 (10)         (18 (20)        (5 (9)       (12   (18)     

Automobile loans

   (12 (12)         (29 (26)        (13 (12)       (30   (29)     

Credit card

   (24 (23)         (48 (46)        (29 (24)       (58   (48)     

Other consumer loans and leases

  (5 (4)         (11 (8)     

Other consumer loans(a)

  (13 (5)       (28   (11)     

Total lossescharged-off

 $  (95 (105)         (202 (222)      $    (118 (95)       (222   (202)     

Recoveries of losses previouslycharged-off:

             

Commercial and industrial loans

 $  16  4          20  8       $    4  16        9    20      

Commercial mortgage loans

   1  1          1  2         1  1        2    1      

Commercial construction loans

   -   -          -  1      

Residential mortgage loans

   2  3          3  5         2  2        3    3      

Home equity

   4  4          7  7         3  4        5    7      

Automobile loans

   6  4          11  10         5  6        11    11      

Credit card

   2  2          5  5         3  2        6    5      

Other consumer loans and leases

  -   -          2  1      

Other consumer loans(a)

  6   -        11    2      

Total recoveries of losses previouslycharged-off

 $  31  18          49  39       $    24  31        47    49      

Net lossescharged-off:

             

Commercial and industrial loans

 $  (18 (39)         (52 (86)      $    (47 (18)       (74   (52)     

Commercial mortgage loans

   (5 (6)         (11 (13)        (2 (5)       (2   (11)     

Commercial construction loans

   -   -          -  1      

Commercial leases

   (1 (1)         (2 (3)        -  (1)       -    (2)     

Residential mortgage loans

   (2 (2)         (7 (5)        (2 (2)       (4   (7)     

Home equity

   (5 (6)         (11 (13)        (2 (5)       (7   (11)     

Automobile loans

   (6 (8)         (18 (16)        (8 (6)       (19   (18)     

Credit card

   (22 (21)         (43 (41)        (26 (22)       (52   (43)     

Other consumer loans and leases

  (5 (4)         (9 (7)     

Other consumer loans

  (7 (5)       (17   (9)     

Total net lossescharged-off

 $  (64 (87)         (153 (183)      $    (94 (64)       (175           (153)     

Net lossescharged-off as a percent of average portfolio loans and leases:

             

Commercial and industrial loans

   0.17 0.36          0.25  0.40         0.44 %  0.17        0.36    0.25      

Commercial mortgage loans

   0.33  0.38          0.31  0.36         0.11  0.33        0.09    0.31      

Commercial construction loans

   -   -          -  (0.03)     

Commercial leases

  0.06  0.09          0.07  0.14        -  0.06        -    0.07      

Total commercial loans and leases

  0.17 0.32          0.23  0.35        0.34 %  0.17        0.27    0.23      

Residential mortgage loans

   0.04  0.06          0.08  0.07         0.05  0.04        0.06    0.08      

Home equity

   0.27  0.30          0.30  0.33         0.12  0.27        0.19    0.30      

Automobile loans

   0.27  0.26          0.38  0.29         0.33  0.27        0.42    0.38      

Credit card

   4.22  3.92          4.13  3.82         4.73  4.22        4.69    4.13      

Other consumer loans and leases

  2.31  2.42          2.58  2.35      

Total consumer loans and leases

  0.46 0.45          0.51  0.46      

Other consumer loans

  1.85  2.31        2.00    2.58      

Total consumer loans

  0.52 %  0.46        0.56    0.51      

Total net lossescharged-off as a percent of average portfolio loans and leases

  0.28 0.37          0.34  0.39        0.41 %  0.28        0.38    0.34      

(a) For the three and six months endedJune 30, 2018, the Bancorp recorded$6 and$10, respectively, in both lossescharged-off and recoveries of lossescharged-off related to customer defaults onpoint-of-sale loans for which the Bancorp obtained recoveries under third-party credit enhancements.

Allowance for Credit Losses

The allowance for credit losses is comprised of the ALLL and the reserve for unfunded commitments. The ALLL provides coverage for probable and estimable losses in the loan and lease portfolio. The Bancorp evaluates the ALLL each quarter to determine its adequacy to cover inherent losses. Several factors are taken into consideration in the determination of the overall ALLL, including an unallocated component. These factors include, but are not limited to, the overall risk profile of the loan and lease portfolios, netcharge-off experience, the extent of impaired loans and leases, the level of nonaccrual loans and leases, the level of 90 days past due loans and leases and the overall level of the ALLL as a percent of portfolio loans and leases. The Bancorp also considers overall asset quality trends, credit administration and portfolio management practices, risk identification practices, credit policy and underwriting practices, overall portfolio growth, portfolio concentrations and current economic conditions that might impact the portfolio. More information on the ALLL can be found in the Critical Accounting Policies section of the Bancorp’s Annual Report on Form10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016.2017.

During the three months ended June 30, 2017,2018, the Bancorp did not substantively change any material aspect of its overall approach in the determination of the ALLL and there have been no material changes in assumptions or estimation techniques as compared to prior periods that impacted the determination of the current period allowance. In addition to the ALLL, the Bancorp maintains a reserve for unfunded commitments recorded in other liabilities in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. The methodology used to determine the adequacy of this reserve is similar to the Bancorp’s methodology for determining the ALLL. The provision for unfunded commitments is included in other noninterest expense in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (continued)

The ALLL attributable to the portion of the residential mortgage and consumer loan and lease portfolio that has not been restructured is determined on a pooled basis with the segmentation based on the similarity of credit risk characteristics. Loss factors for consumer loans are developed for each pool based on the trailing twelve month historical loss rate, as adjusted for certain prescriptive loss rate factors and certain qualitative adjustment factors.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (continued)

The prescriptive loss rate factors and qualitative adjustments are designed to reflect risks associated with current conditions and trends which are not believed to be fully reflected in the trailing twelve month historical loss rate. For real estate backed consumer loans, the prescriptive loss rate factors include adjustments for delinquency trends, LTV trends, refreshed FICO score trends and product mix, and the qualitative factors include adjustments for changes in policies or procedures in underwriting, monitoring or collections, economic conditions, portfolio mix, lending and risk management personnel, results of internal audit and quality control reviews, collateral values and geographic concentrations. The Bancorp considers home price index trends in its footprint and the volatility of collateral valuation trends when determining the collateral value qualitative factor.

The Bancorp’s determination of the ALLL for commercial loans is sensitive to the risk grades it assigns to these loans. In the event that 10% of commercial loans in each risk category would experience a downgrade of one risk category, the allowance for commercial loans would increase by approximately $176$155 million at June 30, 2017.2018. In addition, the Bancorp’s determination of the ALLL for residential mortgage loans and consumer loans is sensitive to changes in estimated loss rates. In the event that estimated loss rates would increase by 10%, the ALLL for residential mortgage loans and consumer loans would increase by approximately $30$32 million at June 30, 2017.2018. As several qualitative and quantitative factors are considered in determining the ALLL, these sensitivity analyses do not necessarily reflect the nature and extent of future changes in the ALLL. They are intended to provide insights into the impact of adverse changes to risk grades and estimated loss rates and do not imply any expectation of future deterioration in the risk ratings or loss rates. Given current processes employed by the Bancorp, management believes the risk grades and estimated loss rates currently assigned are appropriate.

TABLE 59:55: Changes in Allowance for Credit Losses

    For the three months ended
June 30,
          For the six months ended
June 30,
     For the three months ended
June 30,
     For the six months ended
June 30,
 
($ in millions)    2017   2016            2017   2016     2018   2017       2018   2017 

ALLL:

                          

Balance, beginning of period

  $   1,238     1,295             1,253     1,272        $   1,138     1,238           1,196     1,253      

Lossescharged-off(a)

     (95)    (105)            (202)    (222)          (118)    (95)          (222)    (202)     

Recoveries of losses previouslycharged-off(a)

     31     18             49     39           24     31           47     49      

Provision for loan and lease losses

      52     91              126     210            33     52           56     126      

Balance, end of period

  $   1,226     1,299              1,226     1,299        $   1,077     1,226           1,077     1,226      

Reserve for unfunded commitments:

                          

Balance, beginning of period

  $   159     144             161     138        $   151     159           161     161      

Provision for unfunded commitments

          7                  13      

(Benefit from) Provision for unfunded commitments

      (20)    3           (30)    1      

Balance, end of period

  $   162     151              162     151        $   131     162           131     162      

(a)    For the three and six months endedJune 30, 2018, the Bancorp recorded$6 and$10, respectively, in both lossescharged-off and recoveries of lossescharged-off related to customer defaults onpoint-of-sale loans for which the Bancorp obtained recoveries under third-party credit enhancements.

Certain inherent but unconfirmed losses are probable within the loan and lease portfolio. The Bancorp’s current methodology for determining the level of losses is based on historical loss rates, current credit grades, specific allocation on impaired commercial credits above specified thresholds and restructured loans and other qualitative adjustments. Due to the heavy reliance on realized historical losses and the credit grade rating process, the model-derived estimate of ALLL tends to slightly lag behind the deterioration in the portfolio in a stable or deteriorating credit environment, and tends not to be as responsive when improved conditions have presented themselves. Given these model limitations, the qualitative adjustment factors may be incremental or decremental to the quantitative model results.

An unallocated component of the ALLL is maintained to recognize the imprecision in estimating and measuring loss. The unallocated allowance as a percent of total portfolio loans and leases was 0.12% and 0.13% at both June 30, 20172018 and December 31, 2016.2017, respectively. The unallocated allowance was 9%10% of the total allowance at both June 30, 20172018 and December 31, 2016.2017.

As shown in Table 60,56, the ALLL as a percent of portfolio loans and leases was 1.34%1.17% and 1.30% at June 30, 20172018 and 1.36% at December 31, 2016.2017, respectively. The ALLL was $1.1 billion and $1.2 billion at June 30, 20172018 and $1.3 billion at December 31, 2016.2017, respectively.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (continued)

 

 

TABLE 60:56: Attribution of Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses to Portfolio Loans and Leases

As of ($ in millions)  June 30, 2017   December 31, 2016     June 30, 2018   December 31, 2017 

Attributed ALLL:

        

Commercial and industrial loans

  $699          718             $545          651           

Commercial mortgage loans

   87          82              65          65           

Commercial construction loans

   17          16              21          23           

Commercial leases

   14          15              23          14           

Residential mortgage loans

   93          96              86          89           

Home equity

   51          58              39          46           

Automobile loans

   41          42              39          38           

Credit card

   99          102              124          117           

Other consumer loans and leases

   15          12           

Other consumer loans

   27          33           

Unallocated

   110          112              108          120           

Total ALLL

  $1,226          1,253             $1,077          1,196           

Portfolio loans and leases:

        

Commercial and industrial loans

  $40,914          41,676             $41,403          41,170           

Commercial mortgage loans

   6,868          6,899              6,625          6,604           

Commercial construction loans

   4,366          3,903              4,687          4,553           

Commercial leases

   4,157          3,974              3,788          4,068           

Residential mortgage loans

   15,460          15,051              15,640          15,591           

Home equity

   7,301          7,695              6,599          7,014           

Automobile loans

   9,318          9,983              8,938          9,112           

Credit card

   2,117          2,237              2,270          2,299           

Other consumer loans and leases

   945          680           

Other consumer loans

   1,982          1,559           

Total portfolio loans and leases

  $                91,446          92,098             $            91,932          91,970           

Attributed ALLL as a percent of respective portfolio loans and leases:

        

Commercial and industrial loans

   1.71 %     1.72              1.32 %     1.58           

Commercial mortgage loans

   1.27          1.19              0.98          0.98           

Commercial construction loans

   0.39          0.41              0.45          0.51           

Commercial leases

   0.34          0.38              0.61          0.34           

Residential mortgage loans

   0.60          0.64              0.55          0.57           

Home equity

   0.70          0.75              0.59          0.66           

Automobile loans

   0.44          0.42              0.44          0.42           

Credit card

   4.68          4.56              5.46          5.09           

Other consumer loans and leases

   1.59          1.76           

Other consumer loans

   1.36          2.12           

Unallocated (as a percent of total portfolio loans and leases)

   0.12          0.12              0.12          0.13           

Attributed ALLL as a percent of total portfolio loans and leases

   1.34 %     1.36              1.17 %     1.30           

MARKET RISK MANAGEMENT

Market risk is theday-to-day potential for the value of a financial instrument to increase or decrease due to movements in market factors. The Bancorp’s market risk includes risks resulting from movements in interest rates, foreign exchange rates, equity prices and commodity prices. Interest rate risk, a component of market risk, primarily impacts the Bancorp’s NII and interest sensitive fee income categories through changes in interest income on earning assets and cost of interest bearing liabilities, and through fee items that are related to interest sensitive activities such as mortgage origination and servicing income. Management considers interest rate risk a prominent market risk in terms of its potential impact on earnings. Interest rate risk may occur for any one or more of the following reasons:

        ●  Assets and liabilities mature or reprice at different times;

        ●  Short-term and long-term market interest rates change by different amounts; or

        ●  The expected maturities of various assets or liabilities shorten or lengthen as interest rates change.

In addition to the direct impact of interest rate changes on NII, interest rates can indirectly impact earnings through their effect on loan and deposit demand, credit losses, mortgage originations, the value of servicing rights and other sources of the Bancorp’s earnings. Stability of the Bancorp’s net income is largely dependent upon the effective management of interest rate risk. Management continually reviews the Bancorp’s balance sheet composition and earnings flows and models the interest rate risk, and possible actions to reduce this risk, given numerous possible future interest rate scenarios. A series of Policy Limits and Key Risk Indicators are employed to ensure that this risk is managed within the Bancorp’s risk tolerance.

Interest Rate Risk Management Oversight

The Bancorp’s ALCO, which includes senior management representatives and is accountable to the ERMC, monitors and manages interest rate risk within Board approved policy limits. In addition to the risk management activities of ALCO, the Bancorp has a Market Risk Management function as part of ERM that provides independent oversight of market risk activities.

Net Interest Income Sensitivity

The Bancorp employs a variety of measurement techniques to identify and manage its interest rate risk, including the use of an NII simulation model to analyze the sensitivity of NII to changes in interest rates. The model is based on contractual and assumed cash flows and repricing characteristics for all of the Bancorp’s assets, liabilities andoff-balance sheet exposures and incorporates market-based assumptions regarding the effect of changing interest rates on the prepayment rates of certain assets and attrition rates of certain liabilities. The model also includes senior management’s projections of the future volume and pricing of each of the product lines offered by the Bancorp as well as other pertinent assumptions. Actual results may differ from simulated results due to timing, magnitude and frequency of interest rate changes, deviations from projected assumptions, as well as changes in market conditions and management strategies.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (continued)

 

 

TheAs of June 30, 2018, the Bancorp’s interest rate risk exposure is evaluated by measuring the anticipated change in NII over12-month and24-month horizons assuming 100 bps and 200 bps parallel ramped increases and a 62.5100 bps parallel ramped decrease in interest rates. The analysis would typically include 100 bps anda 200 bps parallel ramped decreasesdecrease in interest rates; however, this analysis is currently omitted due to the current levels of certain interest rates.

In this economic cycle, banks have experienced significant growth in deposit balances, particularly inorder to recognize the risk of noninterest-bearing demand deposits. The Bancorp, like other banks, is exposed to deposit balancerun-off in a rising interest rate environment. In consideration of this risk,environment, the Bancorp’s NII sensitivity modeling assumes that approximately $2.5$1 billion of noninterest-bearing demand deposit balancesrun-off over 24 months above what is included in senior management’s baseline projections for each 100 bps increase in short-term market interest rates. TheseSimilarly, the Bancorp’s NII sensitivity modeling incorporates approximately $1 billion of growth in noninterest-bearing demand deposit balances over 24 months above senior management’s baseline projections for each 100 bps decrease in short-term market interest rates. The balancerun-off and growth are modeled to flow into and out of funding products that reprice in conjunction with market rate increases.changes.

Another important deposit modeling assumption is the amount by which interest-bearing deposit rates will increase or decrease when market interest rates increase or decrease. This deposit repricing sensitivity is known as the beta, and it represents the expected amount by which Bancorp deposit rates will change for a given change in short-term market rates. The Bancorp’s NII sensitivity modeling assumes a weighted-average rising rate interest-bearing deposit beta of 69%70% at June 30, 2017,2018, which is approximately 20 percentage points higher than the average beta that the Bancorp experienced in the last FRB tightening cycle from June 2004 to June 2006.

The Bancorp continually evaluates the sensitivity of its interest rate risk measures to these important deposit modeling assumptions. The Bancorp also regularly monitors the sensitivity of other important modeling assumptions, such as loan and security prepayments and early withdrawals on fixed-rate customer liabilities.

The following table shows the Bancorp’s estimated net interest income sensitivity profile and ALCO policy limits as of:

TABLE 61:57: Estimated NII Sensitivity Profile and ALCO Policy Limits

  June 30, 2017       June 30, 2016   

June 30, 2018

   

June 30, 2017

  % Change in NII (FTE)      ALCO Policy Limits      % Change in NII (FTE)          ALCO Policy Limits   

% Change in NII (FTE)

   

  ALCO Policy Limits  

   

% Change in NII (FTE)

   

  ALCO Policy Limits  

Change in Interest Rates (bps)  12
Months
 13-24
Months
      12
Months
   13-24
Months
      12
Months
   13-24
Months
      12
Months
 13-24
Months
   

12

Months

  13-24
Months
   12
Months
  13-24
Months
   12
Months
  13-24
Months
   12
Months
  13-24    
Months    

+200 Ramp over 12 months

   1.90 %   5.85     (4.00)    (6.00)     3.07    11.51     (4.00 (6.00  1.24 %  5.19    (4.00)  (6.00)   1.90  5.85   (4.00)  (6.00)    

+100 Ramp over 12 months

   1.13   3.74     N/A    N/A     1.68    6.92     -   -   0.74       2.92    -  -   1.13  3.74     -    -    

-100 Ramp over 12 months

  (3.75)      (9.11)   (8.00)  (12.00)   N/A  N/A   N/A  N/A    

-62.5 Ramp over 7 months

   (4.04  (7.51    (6.00)    (8.00)     N/A    N/A     -   -   N/A      N/A   N/A  N/A   (4.04)  (7.51)   (6.00)  (8.00)    

At June 30, 2017,2018, the Bancorp’s NII would benefit in both year one and year two under the parallel rate ramp increases. The Bancorp’s NII would decline in both year one and year two under the parallel 62.5100 bps ramped decrease in interest rates. The NII sensitivity profile is attributable to the combination of floating-rate assets, including the predominantly floating-rate commercial loan portfolio, and certain intermediate-term fixed-rate liabilities. As the FRB has increased its target range for the federal funds rate, the sensitivity to declining rates has increased, which is a reflection of the balance sheet mix described above. Reductions in the yield of the commercial loan portfolio would be expected to be only partially offset by a decline in the cost of interest-bearing deposits in this scenario. The changes in the estimated NII sensitivity profile as of June 30, 20172018 compared to June 30, 20162017 were primarily attributable to increasesan increase in market interest rates,outstanding taxable securities balances, the addition of receive-fixed swaps against floating-rate commercial loans, increased utilization of short-term funding and growth in fixed-rate securitiesconsumer loans. These items were partially offset by an increase in core deposit balances and lower projected demand deposit and long-term debt balances.a reduction in fixed-rate commercial leases.

Tables 6258 and 6359 provide the Bancorp’s estimated NII profile at June 30, 20172018 with changes to certain deposit balances and deposit repricing sensitivity (betas) assumptions.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (continued)

 

 

The following table includes the Bancorp’s estimated NII sensitivity profile at June 30, 20172018 with an immediate $1 billion decrease and an immediate $1 billion increase in demand deposit balances:

TABLE 62:58: Estimated NII Sensitivity Profile at June 30, 20172018 with a $1 Billion Change in Demand Deposit Assumption

   % Change in NII (FTE) 
  Immediate $1 Billion Balance
Decrease
    Immediate $1 Billion Balance
Increase
 
Change in Interest Rates (bps) 

12

Months

  

13-24

Months

     

12

Months

  13-24
Months
 

+200 Ramp over 12 months

  1.65 %   5.33    2.16     6.36   

+100 Ramp over 12 months

  1.00   3.49     1.26     4.00   

The following table includes the Bancorp’s estimated NII sensitivity profile at June 30, 2017 with a 25% increase and a 25% decrease to the rising rate deposit beta assumptions as of June 30, 2017. The resulting weighted-average interest-bearing deposit betas included in this analysis are approximately 86% and 52%, respectively, as of June 30, 2017:

TABLE 63: Estimated NII Sensitivity Profile at June 30, 2017 with Deposit Beta Assumptions Changes

 % Change in NII (FTE)  % Change in NII (FTE) 
             Betas 25% Higher                            Betas 25% Lower               

Immediate $1 Billion Balance
Decrease

     Immediate $1 Billion Balance
Increase
 
Change in Interest Rates (bps) 

12

Months

 

13-24

Months

    

12

Months

   

13-24

Months

  

12

Months

 

13-24

Months

    

12

Months

 13-24
Months
 

+200 Ramp over 12 months

 (0.99) %  0.06   4.80      11.64    1.00 %  4.73   1.48   5.65  

+100 Ramp over 12 months

 (0.32)  0.85  2.58      6.64    0.62  2.69   0.86   3.15  

-100 Ramp over 12 months

 (3.87 (9.34 (3.64)  (8.88) 

The following table includes the Bancorp’s estimated NII sensitivity profile at June 30, 2018 with a 25% increase and a 25% decrease to the rising rate deposit beta assumptions as of June 30, 2018. The resulting weighted-average interest-bearing deposit betas included in this analysis were approximately 88% and 53%, respectively, as of June 30, 2018:

TABLE 59: Estimated NII Sensitivity Profile at June 30, 2018 with Deposit Beta Assumptions Changes

The following table includes the Bancorp’s estimated NII sensitivity profile at June 30, 2018 with a 25% increase and a 25% decrease to the rising rate deposit beta assumptions as of June 30, 2018. The resulting weighted-average interest-bearing deposit betas included in this analysis were approximately 88% and 53%, respectively, as of June 30, 2018:

TABLE 59: Estimated NII Sensitivity Profile at June 30, 2018 with Deposit Beta Assumptions Changes

 

 

 % Change in NII (FTE) 
 

 

            Betas 25% Higher             

         Betas 25% Lower     
Change in Interest Rates (bps) 

12

Months

 

13-24

Months

    

12

Months

 

13-24

Months

 

+200 Ramp over 12 months

 (1.66) %  (0.25)   4.14    10.63   

+100 Ramp over 12 months

 (0.71)  0.22   2.18    5.61   

Economic Value of Equity Sensitivity

The Bancorp also uses EVE as a measurement tool in managing interest rate risk. Whereas the NII sensitivity analysis highlights the impact on forecasted NII on an FTE basis(non-GAAP) over one and two year time horizons, EVE is a point in time analysis of the economic sensitivity of current positions that incorporates all cash flows over their estimated remaining lives. The EVE of the balance sheet is defined as the discounted present value of all asset and net derivative cash flows less the discounted value of all liability cash flows. Due to this longer horizon, the sensitivity of EVE to changes in the level of interest rates is a measure of longer-term interest rate risk. EVE values only the current balance sheet and does not incorporate the balance growth assumptions used in the NII sensitivity analysis. As with the NII simulation model, assumptions about the timing and variability of existing balance sheet cash flows are critical in the EVE analysis. Particularly important are assumptions driving loan and security prepayments and the expected balance attrition and pricing of transaction deposits.

The following table shows the Bancorp’s estimated EVE sensitivity profile as of:

TABLE 64:60: Estimated EVE Sensitivity Profile

             June 30, 2017                              June 30, 2016                           June 30, 2018                             June 30, 2017             
Change in Interest Rates (bps) % Change in EVE 

ALCO

Policy Limit

    % Change in EVE ALCO
Policy Limit
  % Change in EVE     ALCO
    Policy Limit    
    % Change in EVE 

      ALCO      

      Policy Limit      

 

+200 Shock

  (4.85) %   (12.00  (1.76)  (12.00  (5.37)  (12.00)   (4.85)    (12.00) 

+100 Shock

  (1.87)   N/A   0.03       (2.38)   -   (1.87)     - 

+25 Shock

  (0.30)   N/A   0.30       N/A   -   (0.30)     - 

-100 Shock

  (1.31)   N/A  N/A  N/A    0.02   -  (1.31)     - 

The EVE sensitivity to the +200 bps rising rate scenario is moderately negative at June 30, 20172018 and slightly negativepositive to a 100 bps decline in market rates. The +100 and +200 bps rising rate sensitivities are upchanges in the estimated EVE sensitivity profile from the sensitivities at June 30, 2016. The higher risk is2017 were primarily related to increasesthe addition of receive-fixed swaps against commercial loans, an increase in market interest rates, growththe floating-rate debt portion of the wholesale funding position and an increase in fixed-ratethe outstanding taxable securities balances. These items were partially offset by an increase in core deposit balances and lower outstanding demand deposit and long-term debt balances.the netrun-off of the fixed-rate commercial lease portfolio.

While an instantaneous shift in interest rates is used in this analysis to provide an estimate of exposure, the Bancorp believes that a gradual shift in interest rates would have a much more modest impact. Since EVE measures the discounted present value of cash flows over the estimated lives of instruments, the change in EVE does not directly correlate to the degree that earnings would be impacted over a shorter time horizon (e.g., the current fiscal year). Further, EVE does not take into account factors such as future balance sheet growth, changes in product mix, changes in yield curve relationships and changing product spreads that could mitigate or exacerbate the impact of changes in interest rates. The NII simulations and EVE analyses do not necessarily include certain actions that management may undertake to manage risk in response to actual changes in interest rates.

The Bancorp regularly evaluates its exposures to a static balance sheet forecast, LIBOR, Prime Rate and other basis risks, yield curve twist risks and embedded options risks. In addition, the impactimpacts on NII on an FTE basis and EVE of extreme changes in interest rates isare modeled, wherein the Bancorp employs the use of yield curve shocks and environment-specific scenarios.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (continued)

 

 

Use of Derivatives to Manage Interest Rate Risk

An integral component of the Bancorp’s interest rate risk management strategy is its use of derivative instruments to minimize significant fluctuations in earnings caused by changes in market interest rates. Examples of derivative instruments that the Bancorp may use as part of its interest rate risk management strategy include interest rate swaps, interest rate floors, interest rate caps, forward contracts, forward starting interest rate swaps, options, swaptions and TBA securities.

As part of its overall risk management strategy relative to its residential mortgage banking activities, the Bancorp enters into forward contracts accounted for as free-standing derivatives to economically hedge IRLCs that are also considered free-standing derivatives. Additionally, the Bancorp economically hedges its exposure to residential mortgage loans held for sale through the use of forward contracts and mortgage options.

The Bancorp also enters into derivatives contracts with major financial institutions to economically hedge market risks assumed in interest rate derivative contracts with commercial customers. Generally, these contracts have similar terms in order to protect the Bancorp from market volatility. Credit risk arises from the possible inability of counterparties to meet the terms of their contracts, which the Bancorp minimizes through collateral arrangements, approvals, limits and monitoring procedures. For further information including the notional amount and fair values of these derivatives, refer to Note 1211 of the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

Portfolio Loans and Leases and Interest Rate Risk

Although the Bancorp’s portfolio loans and leases contain both fixed and floating/adjustable-rate products, the rates of interest earned by the Bancorp on the outstanding balances are generally established for a period of time. The interest rate sensitivity of loans and leases is directly related to the length of time the rate earned is established.

The following table summarizes the carrying value of the Bancorp’s portfolio loans and leases expected cash flows, excluding interest receivable, as of June 30, 2017:2018:

TABLE 65:61: Portfolio Loans and Leases Expected Cash Flows

($ in millions)        Less than 1 year        1-5 years          Over 5 years          Total                  Less than 1 year        1-5 years          Over 5 years          Total          

Commercial and industrial loans

  $21,946            17,540        1,428           40,914           $22,452            17,918        1,033           41,403         

Commercial mortgage loans

   2,622            3,672        574           6,868            2,655            3,378        592           6,625         

Commercial construction loans

   1,451            2,830        85           4,366            2,029            2,587        71           4,687         

Commercial leases

   899             2,048         1,210            4,157            840             1,783         1,165            3,788         

Total commercial loans and leases

   26,918             26,090         3,297            56,305            27,976             25,666         2,861            56,503         

Residential mortgage loans

   2,662            6,480        6,318           15,460            2,329            6,411        6,900           15,640         

Home equity

   1,928            3,777        1,596           7,301            1,678            3,386        1,535           6,599         

Automobile loans

   4,066            4,878        374           9,318            3,792            4,794        352           8,938         

Credit card

   423            1,694        -           2,117            454            1,816        -           2,270         

Other consumer loans and leases

   576             315         54            945         

Total consumer loans and leases

   9,655             17,144         8,342            35,141         

Other consumer loans

   1,198             517         267            1,982         

Total consumer loans

   9,451             16,924         9,054            35,429         

Total portfolio loans and leases

  $36,573             43,234         11,639            91,446           $37,427             42,590         11,915            91,932         

Additionally, the following table displays a summary of expected cash flows, excluding interest receivable, occurring after one year for both fixed and floating/adjustable-rate loans and leases as of June 30, 2017:2018:

TABLE 66:62: Portfolio Loans and Leases Expected Cash Flows Occurring After 1 Year

    Interest Rate       Interest Rate   
($ in millions)  Fixed                           Floating or Adjustable                     Fixed                            Floating or Adjustable       

Commercial and industrial loans

     2,504                            16,464                      2,441                            16,510                 

Commercial mortgage loans

     876                            3,370                      953                            3,017                 

Commercial construction loans

     63                            2,852                      29                            2,629                 

Commercial leases

      3,258                            -                       2,948                            -                 

Total commercial loans and leases

      6,701                            22,686                       6,371                            22,156                 

Residential mortgage loans

     9,769                            3,029                      10,038                            3,273                 

Home equity

     524                            4,849                      455                            4,466                 

Automobile loans

     5,207                            45                      5,114                            32                 

Credit card

     512                            1,182                      501                            1,315                 

Other consumer loans and leases

      161                            208                 

Total consumer loans and leases

      16,173                            9,313                 

Other consumer loans

      529                            255                 

Total consumer loans

      16,637                            9,341                 

Total portfolio loans and leases

     22,874                            31,999                      23,008                            31,497                 

Residential Mortgage Servicing Rights and Interest Rate Risk

Effective January 1, 2017, the Bancorp elected to prospectively adopt the fair value method for all existing classes of its residential mortgage servicing rights portfolio. Upon this election, all servicing rights are measured at fair value at each reporting date and changes in the fair value of servicing rights are reported in mortgage banking net revenue in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income in the period in which the changes occur. Prior to the election of the fair value method, servicing rights were initially recorded at fair value and subsequently amortized in proportion to, and over the period of, estimated net servicing revenue. Servicing rights were assessed for impairment monthly, based on fair value, with temporary impairment recognized through a valuation allowance.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (continued)

The fair value of the residential MSR portfolio was $849$959 million and $858 million at June 30, 20172018 and the net carrying amount of the residential MSR portfolio was $744 million as of December 31, 2016.2017, respectively. The value of servicing rights can fluctuate sharply depending on changes in interest rates and other factors. Generally, as interest rates decline and loans are prepaid to take advantage of refinancing, the total value of existing servicing rights declines because no further servicing fees are collected on repaid loans. The Bancorp maintains anon-qualifying hedging strategy relative to its mortgage banking activity in order to manage a portion of the risk associated with changes in the value of its MSR portfolio as a result of changing interest rates.

Mortgage rates increased during both the three and six months ended June 30, 2018 which caused modeled prepayment speeds to slow. The fair value of the MSR increased $21 million and $78 million, respectively, due to changes to inputs to the valuation model including prepayment speeds and OAS spread assumptions and decreased $34 million and $62 million, respectively, due to the passage of time, including the impact of regularly scheduled repayments, paydowns and payoffs for the three and six months ended June 30, 2018.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (continued)

Mortgage rates decreased during the three and six months ended June 30, 2017 which caused modeled prepayment speeds to increase which led to fair value adjustments on servicing rights. The fair value of the MSR decreased $17 million and $13 million, respectively, due to changes to inputs to the valuation model including prepayment speeds and OAS spread assumptions and decreased $30 million and $57 million, respectively, due to the passage of time, including the impact of regularly scheduled repayments, paydowns and payoffs for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017. Mortgage rates decreased during both the three and six months ended June 30, 2016 which caused modeled prepayment speeds to increase which led to temporary impairment of $45 million and $131 million, respectively, on servicing rights. Previously, servicing rights were deemed temporarily impaired when a borrower’s loan rate was distinctly higher than prevailing rates. Temporary impairment on servicing rights was reversed when the prevailing rates returned to a level commensurate with the borrower’s loan rate.

The Bancorp recognized net gainslosses of $18$20 million and $17$82 million, respectively, on itsnon-qualifying hedging strategy for the three and six months ended June 30, 20172018 compared to net gains of $51$18 million and $149$17 million, respectively, during the three and six months ended June 30, 2016.2017. These amounts include net gainslosses on securities related to the Bancorp’snon-qualifying hedging strategy which were $4 million and $17 million, respectively, during the three and six months ended June 30, 2018 and net gains of $2 million during both the three and six months ended June 30, 2017 and zero for both the three and six months ended June 30, 2016.2017. The Bancorp may adjust its hedging strategy to reflect its assessment of the composition of its MSR portfolio, the cost of hedging and the anticipated effectiveness of the hedges given the economic environment. Refer to Note 1110 of the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for further discussion on servicing rights and the instruments used to hedge interest rate risk on MSRs.

Foreign Currency Risk

The Bancorp may enter into foreign exchange derivative contracts to economically hedge certain foreign denominated loans. The derivatives are classified as free-standing instruments with the revaluation gain or loss being recorded in other noninterest income in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income. The balance of the Bancorp’s foreign denominated loans at June 30, 20172018 and December 31, 20162017 was $973$932 million and $827$939 million, respectively. The Bancorp also enters into foreign exchange contracts for the benefit of commercial customers to hedge their exposure to foreign currency fluctuations. Similar to the hedging of interest rate risk from interest rate derivative contracts, the Bancorp also enters into foreign exchange contracts with major financial institutions to economically hedge a substantial portion of the exposure from client driven foreign exchange activity. The Bancorp has risk limits and internal controls in place to help ensure excessive risk is not being taken in providing this service to customers. These controls include an independent determination of currency volatility and credit equivalent exposure on these contracts, counterparty credit approvals and country limits performed by the Capital Markets Credit department and Capital Markets Risk department.

Commodity Risk

The Bancorp also enters into commodity contracts for the benefit of commercial customers to hedge their exposure to commodity price fluctuations. Similar to the hedging of foreign exchange and interest rate risk from interest rate derivative contracts, the Bancorp also enters into commodity contracts with major financial institutions to economically hedge a substantial portion of the exposure from client driven commodity activity. The Bancorp may also offset this risk with exchange tradedexchange-traded commodity contracts. The Bancorp has risk limits and internal controls in place to help ensure excessive risk is not taken in providing this service to customers. These controls include an independent determination of commodity volatility and credit equivalent exposure on these contracts and counterparty credit approvals performed by the Capital Markets Credit department and Capital Markets Risk department.

LIQUIDITY RISK MANAGEMENT

The goal of liquidity management is to provide adequate funds to meet changes in loan and lease demand, unexpected levels of deposit withdrawals and other contractual obligations. Mitigating liquidity risk is accomplished by maintaining liquid assets in the form of cash and investment securities, maintaining sufficient unused borrowing capacity in the debt markets and delivering consistent growth in core deposits. A summary of certain obligations and commitments to make future payments under contracts is included in Note 1615 of the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

The Bancorp’s Treasury department manages funding and liquidity based onpoint-in-time metrics as well as forward-looking projections, which incorporate different sources and uses of funds under base and stress scenarios. Liquidity risk is monitored and managed by the Treasury department, and a series of Policy Limits and Key Risk Indicators are established to ensure risks are managed within the Bancorp’s risk tolerance. The Bancorp maintains a contingency funding plan that provides for liquidity stress testing, which assesses the liquidity needs under varying market conditions, time horizons, asset growth rates and other events. The contingency plan provides for ongoing monitoring of unused borrowing capacity and available sources of contingent liquidity to prepare for unexpected liquidity needs and to cover unanticipated events that could affect liquidity. The contingency plan also outlines the Bancorp’s response to various levels of liquidity stress and actions that should be taken during various scenarios.

Liquidity Risk Management Oversight

The Bancorp’s ALCO, which includes senior management representatives and is accountable to the ERMC, monitors and manages liquidity and funding risk within Board approvedBoard-approved policy limits. In addition to the risk management activities of ALCO, the Bancorp has a Market Risk Management function as part of ERM that provides independent oversight of liquidity risk management.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (continued)

Sources of Funds

The Bancorp’s primary sources of funds relate to cash flows from loan and lease repayments, payments from securities related to sales and maturities, the sale or securitization of loans and leases and funds generated by core deposits, in addition to the use of public and private debt offerings.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (continued)

Table 6561 of the Market Risk Management subsection of the Risk Management section of MD&A illustrates the expected maturities from loan and lease repayments. Of the $31.8$32.0 billion of securities in the Bancorp’savailable-for-sale debt and other securities portfolio at June 30, 2017, $5.02018, $3.7 billion in principal and interest is expected to be received in the next 12 months and an additional $3.4$3.2 billion is expected to be received in the next 13 to 24 months. For further information on the Bancorp’s securities portfolio, refer to the Investment Securities subsection of the Balance Sheet Analysis section of MD&A.

Asset-driven liquidity is provided by the Bancorp’s ability to sell or securitize loans and leases. In order to reduce the exposure to interest rate fluctuations and to manage liquidity, the Bancorp has developed securitization and sale procedures for several types of interest-sensitive assets. A majority of the long-term, fixed-rate single-family residential mortgage loans underwritten according to FHLMC or FNMA guidelines are sold for cash upon origination. Additional assets such as certain other residential mortgage loans, certain commercial loans, home equity loans, automobile loans and other consumer loans are also capable of being securitized or sold. The Bancorp sold or securitized loans totaling $1.5 billion and $2.6 billion during the three and six months ended June 30, 2018, respectively, compared to $1.6 billion and $3.2 billion during the three and six months ended June 30, 2017, respectively, compared to $1.8 billion and $3.1 billion during the three and six months ended June 30, 2016, respectively. For further information on the transfer of financial assets, refer to Note 1110 of the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

Core deposits have historically provided the Bancorp with a sizeable source of relatively stable and low cost funds. The Bancorp’s average core deposits and average shareholders’ equity funded 83% of its average total assets for both the three and six months ended June 30, 20172018 and 81% for both the three and six months ended June 30, 2016,2017, respectively. In addition to core deposit funding, the Bancorp also accesses a variety of other short-term and long-term funding sources, which include the use of the FHLB system. Certificates $100,000 and over and deposits in the Bancorp’s foreign branch located in the Cayman Islands are wholesale funding tools utilized to fund asset growth. Management does not rely on any one source of liquidity and manages availability in response to changing balance sheet needs.

As of June 30, 2017, $8.22018, $7.3 billion of debt or other securities were available for issuance under the current Bancorp’s Board of Directors’ authorizations and the Bancorp is authorized to file any necessary registration statements with the SEC to permit ready access to the public securities markets; however, access to these markets may depend on market conditions. OnDuring the six months ended June 15, 2017,30, 2018, the Bancorp issued and sold $700$900 million of unsecured senior fixed-rate notes. At June 30, 2017,2018, the Bancorp has approximately $39.6$42.5 billion of borrowing capacity available through secured borrowing sources including the FHLB and FRB.

The Bank’s global bank note program has a borrowing capacity of $25.0 billion, of which $17.7$17.3 billion iswas available for issuance as of June 30, 2017.2018. For further information on a subsequent event related to long-term debt, refer to Note 24.

Liquidity Coverage Ratio and Net Stable Funding Ratio

The Bancorp is subject to the Modified LCR requirement, which stipulates that BHCs with at least $50 billion or morebut less than $250 billion in total consolidated assets that are not internationally active, such as the Bancorp, maintain HQLA equal to their calculated net cash outflows over a 30calendar-day stress period multiplied by a factor of 0.7. The Bancorp’s Modified LCR was 115%116% at June 30, 2017 which represents a 7 percentage point reduction from the amount disclosed in the Bancorp’s Form 8-K filed on July 21, 2017 due to refinements in the Bancorp’s internal Modified LCR calculation.2018.

On June 1, 2016, the U.S. banking agencies published a notice of proposed rulemaking to implement a modified NSFR for certain bank holding companies with at least $50 billion but less than $250 billion in total consolidated assets and with less than $10 billion inon-balance sheet foreign exposures, including the Bancorp. Generally consistent with the BCBS’ framework, under the proposed rule banking organizations would be required to hold an amount of ASF over aone-year time horizon that equals or exceeds the institution’s amount of RSF, with the ASF representing the numerator and the RSF representing the denominator of the NSFR. Banking organizations subject to the modified NSFR would multiply the RSF amount by 70%, such that the RSF amount required for these institutions would be equivalent to 70% of the RSF amount that would be required pursuant to the full NSFR generally applicable to institutions with at least $250 billion in total consolidated assets or $10 billion or more inon-balance sheet foreign exposures under the proposed rule.

The Bancorp is currently evaluating the impact of the U.S. banking agencies’ NSFR proposal. If ultimately adopted as currently proposed, the implementation of the NSFR could impact the Bancorp’s liquidity and funding requirements and practices in the future, including by incentivizing increased use of long-term debt as a funding source. Under the proposal, the NSFR becomes effective January 1, 2018 with public disclosure requirements beginning for the calendar quarter that ends on March 31, 2018. The comment period for this proposal ended on August 5, 2016. The Bancorp is currently awaiting the final rule from the U.S. banking agencies.

Credit Ratings

The cost and availability of financing to the Bancorp and Bank are impacted by its credit ratings. A downgrade to the Bancorp’s or Bank’s credit ratings could affect its ability to access the credit markets and increase its borrowing costs, thereby adversely impacting the Bancorp’s or Bank’s financial condition and liquidity. Key factors in maintaining high credit ratings include a stable and diverse earnings stream, strong credit quality, strong capital ratios and diverse funding sources, in addition to disciplined liquidity monitoring procedures.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (continued)

The Bancorp’s and Bank’s credit ratings are summarized in Table 67.63. The ratings reflect the ratings agency’s view on the Bancorp’s and Bank’s capacity to meet financial commitments.*

*As an investor, you should be aware that a security rating is not a recommendation to buy, sell or hold securities, that it may be subject to revision or withdrawal at any time by the assigning rating organization and that each rating should be evaluated independently of any other rating. Additional information on the credit rating ranking within the overall classification system is located on the website of each credit rating agency.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (continued)

 

TABLE 67:63: Agency Ratings                
As of August 8, 20172018 Moody’s Standard and Poor’s  Fitch      DBRS     

Fifth Third Bancorp:

    

Short-term borrowings

 No rating A-2 F1   R-1L     

Senior debt

 Baa1 BBB+ AAL    

Subordinated debt

Baa1BBB A- BBBH    

Fifth Third Bank:

Short-term

P-1A-2F1R-1L    

Long-term deposit

Aa3No ratingA+A    

Senior debt

A3A-A   A     

Subordinated debt

 Baa1BBB BBB+ A-   AL

Fifth Third Bank:

Short-term borrowings

P-2A-2F1R-1M    

Short-term deposit

P-1No ratingF1No rating    

Long-term deposit

Aa3No ratingAAH    

Senior debt

A3A-A-AH    

Subordinated debt

Baa1BBB+BBB+A     

Rating Agency Outlook for Fifth Third Bancorp and Fifth Third Bank:

 Stable Stable NegativeStable      Stable     

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (continued)

OPERATIONAL RISK MANAGEMENT

Operational risk is the risk of loss resulting from inadequate or failed processes or systems or due to external events that are neither market nor credit-related. Operational risk is inherent in the Bancorp’s activities and can manifest itself in various ways including fraudulent acts, business interruptions, inappropriate behavior of employees, unintentional failure to comply with applicable laws and regulations, cyber-security incidents and privacy breaches or failure of vendors to perform in accordance with their arrangements. These events could result in financial losses, litigation and regulatory fines, as well as other damage to the Bancorp. The Bancorp’s risk management goal is to keep operational risk at appropriate levels consistent with the Bancorp’s risk appetite, financial strength, the characteristics of its businesses, the markets in which it operates and the competitive and regulatory environment to which it is subject.

To control, monitor and govern operational risk, the Bancorp maintains an overall Risk Management Framework which comprises governance oversight, risk assessment, capital measurement, monitoring and reporting as well as a formal three lines of defense approach. ERM is responsible for prescribing the framework to the lines of business and corporate functions, and to provide independent oversight of its implementation (second line of defense). Business Controls groups are in place in each of the lines of business to ensure consistent implementation and execution of managing day to dayday-to-day operational risk (first line of defense).

The Bancorp’s risk management framework consists of five integrated components, including identifying, assessing, managing, monitoring and independent governance reporting of risk. The corporate Operational Risk Management function within Enterprise Risk is responsible for developing and overseeing the implementation of the Bancorp’s approach to managing operational risk. This includes providing governance, awareness and training, tools, guidance and oversight to support implementation of key risk programs and systems as they relate to operational risk management, such as risk and control self-assessments, new product/initiative risk reviews, key risk indicators, Vendor Risk Management, cyber security risk management and review of operational losses. The function is also responsible for developing reports that support the proactive management of operational risk across the enterprise. The lines of business and corporate functions are responsible for managing the operational risks associated with their areas in accordance with the risk management framework. The framework is intended to enable the Bancorp to function with a sound and well-controlled operational environment. These processes support the Bancorp’s goals to minimize future operational losses and strengthen the Bancorp’s performance by maintaining sufficient capital to absorb operational losses that are incurred.

The Bancorp also maintains a robust information security program to support the management of cyber security risk within the organization with a focus on prevention, detection and recovery processes. Fifth Third utilizes a wide array of techniques to secure its operations and proprietary information such as Board-approved policies and programs, network monitoring and testing, access controls and dedicated security personnel. Fifth Third has adopted the National Institute of Standards and Technology Cyber Security Framework for the management and deployment of cyber security controls and is an active participant in the financial sector information sharing organization structure, known as the Financial Services Information Sharing and Analysis Center. To ensure resiliency of key Bancorp functions, Fifth Third also employs redundancy protocols that include a robust business continuity function that works to mitigate any potential impacts to Fifth Third customers and its systems.

Fifth Third also focuses on the reporting and escalation of operational control issues to senior management and the Board of Directors. The Operational Risk Committee is the key committee that oversees and supports Fifth Third in the management of operational risk across the enterprise. The Operational Risk Committee reports to the ERMC, which reports to the Risk and Compliance Committee of the Board of Directors.

COMPLIANCE RISK MANAGEMENT

Regulatory compliance risk is defined as the risk of legal or regulatory sanctions, financial loss or damage to reputation as a result of noncompliance with (i) applicable laws, regulations, rules and other regulatory requirements (including but not limited to the risk of consumers experiencing economic loss or other legal harm as a result of noncompliance with consumer protection laws, regulations and requirements); (ii) internal policies and procedures, standards of best practice or codes of conduct; and (iii) principles of integrity and fair dealing applicable to Fifth Third’s activities and functions. Fifth Third focuses on managing regulatory compliance risk in accordance with the Bancorp’s integrated risk management framework, which ensures consistent processes for identifying, assessing, managing, monitoring and reporting risks. The Bancorp’s risk management goal is to keep compliance risk at appropriate levels consistent with the Bancorp’s risk appetite.

The current regulatory environment, including heightened regulatory expectations and material changes in laws and regulations, increases compliance risk. To mitigate compliance risk, Compliance Risk Management provides independent oversight to ensure consistency and sufficiency in the execution of the program, and ensures that lines of business, regions and support functions are adequately identifying, assessing and monitoring compliance risks and adopting proper mitigation strategies. The lines of business and enterprise functions are responsible for managing the compliance risks associated with their areas. Additionally, the Chief Compliance Officer is responsible for establishing and overseeing the Compliance Risk Management program which implements key compliance programs and processes, including but not limited to, executive- and board-level governance and reporting routines, compliance-related policies, risk assessments, key risk indicators, issues tracking, regulatory compliance testing and monitoring, anti-money laundering, privacy and, in partnership with the Corporate ResponsibilityCommunity and ReputationEconomic Development team, oversees the Bancorp’s compliance with the Community Reinvestment Act.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (continued)

Fifth Third also focuses on the reporting and escalation of compliance issues to senior management and the Board of Directors. The Management Compliance Committee, which is chaired by the Chief Compliance Officer, is the key committee that oversees and supports Fifth Third in the management of compliance risk across the enterprise. The Management Compliance Committee oversees Fifth Third-wide compliance issues, industry best practices, legislative developments (in coordination with the Regulatory Change Management Committee), regulatory concerns and other leading indicators of compliance risk. The Management Compliance Committee reports to the ERMC, which reports to the Risk and Compliance Committee of the Board of Directors.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (continued)

CAPITAL MANAGEMENT

Management regularly reviews the Bancorp’s capital levels to help ensure it is appropriately positioned under various operating environments. The Bancorp has established a Capital Committee which is responsible for making capital plan recommendations to management. These recommendations are reviewed by the ERMC and the annual capital plan is approved by the Board of Directors. The Capital Committee is responsible for execution and oversight of the capital actions of the capital plan.

Regulatory Capital Ratios

The Basel III Final Rule was effective for the Bancorp on January 1, 2015 and setsets minimum regulatory capital ratios as well as defineddefines the measure of “well-capitalized”.

TABLE 68:64: Prescribed Capital Ratios

    Minimum           Well-Capitalized          

CET1 capital

   4.50 %   6.50       

Tier I risk-based capital

   6.00   8.00       

Total risk-based capital

   8.00   10.00       

Tier I leverage

   4.00   5.00       

On January 1, 2016, the Bancorp became subject to a capital conservation buffer which will be phased in over a three-year period ending January 1, 2019. Once fullyphased-in, the capital conservation buffer will be 2.5% in addition to the minimum capital ratios, in order to avoid limitations on certain capital distributions and discretionary bonus payments to executive officers. The capital conservation buffer was 0.625% in 2016, 1.25% in 2017 and is 1.25%1.875% in 2017.2018. The Bancorp exceeded these “well-capitalized” and “capital conservation buffer” ratios for all periods presented.

In April 2018, the federal banking regulators proposed transitional arrangements to permit banking organizations to phase in theday-one impact of the adoption of ASU2016-03, referred to as the current expected credit loss model, on regulatory capital over a period of three years. For additional information on ASU2016-03, refer to Note 3 of the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements. The Bancorp is evaluating the impact of this proposal.

The following table summarizes the Bancorp’s capital ratios as of:

TABLE 69:65: Capital Ratios

($ in millions)    June 30, 2017        December 31, 2016      June 30, 2018 December 31, 2017      

Quarterly average total Bancorp shareholders’ equity as a percent of average assets

  11.84 %  11.66     11.38 %  11.69     

Tangible equity as a percent of tangible assets(a)

  9.98       9.82     10.29      9.90     

Tangible common equity as a percentage of tangible assets(a)(c)

  9.02       8.87       9.33      8.94     
   Basel III(b) 
  Basel III Transitional(b)    

 

 

 

CET1 capital

 $ 12,522       12,426  $   12,986      12,517     

Tier I capital

  13,853       13,756     14,317      13,848     

Total regulatory capital

  17,927       17,972     18,116      17,887     

Risk-weighted assets

  117,761       119,632     119,073      117,997     

Regulatory capital ratios:

         

CET1 capital

  10.63 %  10.39     10.91 %  10.61     

Tier I risk-based capital

  11.76       11.50     12.02       11.74     

Total risk-based capital

  15.22       15.02     15.21       15.16     

Tier I leverage

  10.07       9.90     10.24       10.01     
  Basel III FullyPhased-In(b) 

CET1 capital(a)

 10.52 %  10.29 
(a)

These arenon-GAAP measures. For further information, refer to theNon-GAAP Financial Measures section of MD&A.

(b)

Under the U.S. banking agencies’ Basel III Final Rule, assets and credit equivalent amounts ofoff-balance sheet exposures are calculated according to the standardized approach for risk-weighted assets. The resulting weighted values are added together resulting in the total risk-weighted assets. Under the banking agencies’ Final Rule published in November 2017 pertaining to certain regulatory items for banks subject to the standardized approach, the Bancorp is no longer subject to certain transition provisions and phase-outs beyond 2017.

(c)

Excludes unrealized gains and losses.

Stress Tests and CCAR

In 2011 the FRB adopted the capital plan rule, which requires BHCs with consolidated assets of $50 billion or more to submit annual capital plans to the FRB for review. Under the rule, these capital plans must include detailed descriptions of the following: the BHC’s internal processes for assessing capital adequacy; the policies governing capital actions such as common stock issuances, dividends and share repurchases; and all planned capital actions over a nine-quarter planning horizon. Further, each BHC must also report to the FRB the results of stress tests conducted by the BHC under a number of scenarios that assess the sources and uses of capital under baseline and stressed economic scenarios. The FRB launched the 20172018 stress testing program and CCAR on February 3, 2017,1, 2018, with submissions of stress test results and capital plans to the FRB due on April 5, 2017,2018, which the Bancorp submitted as required.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (continued)

The FRB’s review of the capital plan assessed the comprehensiveness of the capital plan, the reasonableness of the assumptions and the analysis underlying the capital plan. Additionally, the FRB reviewed the robustness of the capital adequacy process, the capital policy and the Bancorp’s ability to maintain capital above each minimum regulatory capital ratio on a pro forma basis under expected and stressful conditions throughout the planning horizon.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (continued)

On June 28, 2017,2018, the Bancorp announced the results of its capital plan submitted to the FRB as part of the 20172018 CCAR. For BHCs that proposed capital distributions in their plans, the FRB either objected to the plan or provided anon-objection whereby the FRB permitted the proposed capital distributions. The FRB indicated to the Bancorp that it did not object to the following capital actions for the period beginning July 1, 20172018 and ending June 30, 2018:2019:

 

  

The increase in the quarterly common stock dividend to $0.16$0.22 from $0.14$0.18 beginning in the thirdfourth quarter of 20172018 and to $0.18$0.24 beginning in the second quarter of 2018,2019, a 29%33% increase over the current dividend rate;

  

The repurchase of common shares in an amount up to $1.161$1.651 billion, or a 76%42% increase over the 20162017 capital plan. These repurchases include $88$81 million in repurchases related to share issuances under employee benefit plans and $48$53 million in repurchases related to previously-recognized TRA transactionafter-tax gains;

  

The additional ability to repurchase common shares in the amount of anyafter-tax capital generated from the sale of Vantiv,Worldpay, Inc. common stock;

  

The additional ability to repurchase common shares in the amount of anyafter-tax cash income generated from the termination and settlement of gross cash flows from existing TRAs with Vantiv,Worldpay, Inc. or potential future TRAs that may be generated from additional sales of Vantiv,Worldpay, Inc.

On May 21, 2018, the Bancorp announced an acquisition of MB Financial. As a result, a resubmission of Fifth Third’s capital plan to the FRB is pending. However, this resubmission will not delay the implementation of the previously approved 2018 CCAR capital distributions.

Additionally, as a CCAR institution, the Bancorp is required to disclose the results of itscompany-run stress test under the supervisory adverse and supervisory severely adverse scenarios and to provide information related to the types of risk included in its stress testing, a general description of the methodologies used, estimates of certain financial results and pro forma capital ratios, and an explanation of the most significant causes of changes in regulatory capital ratios. On June 22, 201721, 2018, the Bancorp publicly disclosed the results of itscompany-run stress test as required by the DFA stress testing rules, which isare available on Fifth Third’s website athttps://www.53.com. With Fifth Third’s designation as a Large andNon-complex Bank, it is no longer subject to the qualitative aspects of the CCAR program. It is, however, subject to the FRB’s Horizontal Capital Review, which will be conducted in the third quarter of 2017.2018.

In April 2018, the FRB proposed to introduce stress buffer requirements. Under the proposal, a SCB would replace the 2.5% capital conservation buffer. The SCB would reflect stressed losses in the supervisory severely adverse scenario of the FRB’s CCAR stress tests plus four quarters of planned common stock dividends, subject to a floor of 2.5%. The proposal would also introduce a SLB requirement, analogous to the SCB, that would apply to the Tier I leverage ratio. In addition, the proposal would require BHCs to reduce their planned capital distributions if those distributions would not be consistent with the applicable capital buffer constraints based on the BHCs’ own baseline scenario projections. The proposal is applicable for BHCs with $50 billion or more in total consolidated assets, including the Bancorp. Under the proposal, a BHC’s first SCB and SLB requirements would become effective on October 1, 2019. The Bancorp is evaluating the impact of this proposal.

Dividend Policy and Stock Repurchase Program

The Bancorp’s common stock dividend policy and stock repurchase program reflect its earnings outlook, desired payout ratios, the need to maintain adequate capital levels, the ability of its subsidiaries to pay dividends, the need to comply with safe and sound banking practices as well as meet regulatory requirements and expectations. The Bancorp declared dividends per common share of $0.14$0.18 and $0.13$0.14 for the three months ended June 30, 20172018 and 2016,2017, respectively, and $0.28$0.34 and $0.26$0.28 for the six months ended June 30, 20172018 and 2016,2017, respectively. As contemplated by the 20162017 CCAR, during the second quarter of 2017,2018, the Bancorp entered into and settled a $342$235 million accelerated share repurchase transaction. Refer to Note 1514 of the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information on the accelerated share repurchases.

The following table summarizes the monthly share repurchase activity for the three months ended June 30, 2017:2018:

TABLE 70:66: Share Repurchases

Period  Total Number        
of Shares        
Purchased(a)        
       Average Price  
Paid Per Share  
   Total Number of Shares
Purchased as Part of
Publicly Announced Plans
or Programs
   Maximum Number of
Shares that May Yet be
Purchased Under the Plans
or Programs(b)

April 1, 2017 - April 30, 2017

   991,992           $   24.02    -   80,597,035 

May 1, 2017 - May 31, 2017

   11,752,371             25.08    11,641,971   68,955,064 

June 1, 2017 - June 30, 2017

   145,294                23.81    -   68,955,064 

Total

   12,889,657           $   24.98    11,641,971   68,955,064 
Period  Total Number        
of Shares        
Purchased(a)    
   Average Price  
Paid Per Share  
   Total Number of Shares
Purchased as Part of
Publicly Announced Plans
or Programs
   Maximum Number of
Shares that May Yet be
Purchased Under the Plans
or Programs(b)

April 1, 2018 - April 30, 2018

   721,491           $31.47    -   100,000,000 

May 1, 2018 - May 31, 2018

   6,482,285            31.41    6,402,244   93,597,756 

June 1, 2018 - June 30, 2018

   1,221,018            29.04    1,172,122   92,425,634 

Total

   8,424,794           $                    31.07    7,574,366   92,425,634 
(a)

Includes 1,247,686850,428 shares repurchased during the second quarter of 20172018 in connection with various employee compensation plans. These purchases do not count against the maximum number of shares that may yet be purchased under the Board of Directors’ authorization.

(b)

In MarchDuring the first quarter of 2016,2018, the Bancorp announced that its Board of Directors had authorized management to purchase 100 million shares of the Bancorp’s common stock through the open market or in any private party transactions. The authorization does not include specific price targets or an expiration date.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (continued)

 

 

OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS

In the ordinary course of business, the Bancorp enters into financial transactions that are consideredoff-balance sheet arrangements as they involve varying elements of market, credit and liquidity risk in excess of the amounts recognized in the Bancorp’s Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. The Bancorp’soff-balance sheet arrangements include commitments, guarantees, contingent liabilities and transactions withnon-consolidated VIEs. A brief discussion of these transactions is as follows:

Commitments

The Bancorp has certain commitments to make future payments under contracts, including commitments to extend credit, letters of credit, forward contracts related to residential mortgage loans held for sale, noncancelable operating lease obligations, purchase obligations, capital commitments for private equity investments, capital expenditures and capital lease obligations. Refer to Note 1615 of the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information on commitments.

Guarantees and Contingent Liabilities

The Bancorp has performance obligations upon the occurrence of certain events provided in certain contractual arrangements, including residential mortgage loans sold with representation and warranty provisions or credit recourse. Refer to Note 1615 of the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information on guarantees and contingent liabilities.

Transactions withNon-consolidated VIEs

The Bancorp engages in a variety of activities that involve VIEs, which are legal entities that lack sufficient equity to finance their activities, or the equity investors of the entities as a group lack any of the characteristics of a controlling interest. The investments in those entities in which the Bancorp was determined not to be the primary beneficiary but holds a variable interest in the entity are accounted for under the equity method of accounting or other accounting standards as appropriate and not consolidated. Refer to Note 109 of the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information onnon-consolidated VIEs.

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure about Market Risk (Item 3)

 

Information presented in the Market Risk Management section of Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations is incorporated herein by reference.

Controls and Procedures (Item 4)

 

The Bancorp conducted an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of the Bancorp’s management, including the Bancorp’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Bancorp’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules13a-15(e) and15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934). Based on the foregoing, as of the end of the period covered by this report, the Bancorp’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the Bancorp’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective, in all material respects, to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports the Bancorp files and submits under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported as and when required and information is accumulated and communicated to the Bancorp’s management, including its Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

The Bancorp’s management also conducted an evaluation of internal control over financial reporting to determine whether any changes occurred during the period covered by this report that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Bancorp’s internal control over financial reporting. Based on this evaluation, there has been no such change during the period covered by this report.

Fifth Third Bancorp and Subsidiaries

Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes (Item 1)

 

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (unaudited)

     As of      As of 
($ in millions, except share data)   

June 30,

2017

 December 31,    
2016    
    June 30,    
2018    
 December 31,   
2017    
 

Assets

        

Cash and due from banks(a)

 $   2,203  2,392  $   2,052  2,514 

Available-for-sale and other securities(b)

    31,823  31,183 

Other short-term investments(a)

    1,636  2,753 

Available-for-sale debt and other securities(b)

    31,961  31,751 

Held-to-maturity securities(c)

    26  26       19  24 

Trading securities

    842  410 

Other short-term investments

    2,163  2,754 

Loans held for sale(d)

    766  751 

Trading debt securities

    280  492 

Equity securities

    475  439 

Loans and leases held for sale(d)

    783  492 

Portfolio loans and leases(a)(e)

    91,446  92,098     91,932  91,970 

Allowance for loan and lease losses(a)

    (1,226 (1,253    (1,077)  (1,196

Portfolio loans and leases, net

    90,220  90,845     90,855  90,774 

Bank premises and equipment(f)

    2,041  2,065     1,915  2,003 

Operating lease equipment

    719  738     606  646 

Goodwill

    2,423  2,416     2,462  2,445 

Intangible assets

    18  9       30  27 

Servicing rights(g)

    849  744 

Servicing rights

    959  858 

Other assets(a)

    6,974  7,844     6,662  6,975 

Total Assets

 $   141,067  142,177  $   140,695  142,193 

Liabilities

        

Deposits:

        

Noninterest-bearing deposits

 $   34,965  35,782  $   32,680  35,276 

Interest-bearing deposits

    66,915  68,039     71,451  67,886 

Total deposits

    101,880  103,821     104,131  103,162 

Federal funds purchased

    117  132     597  174 

Other short-term borrowings

    5,389  3,535     1,763  4,012 

Accrued taxes, interest and expenses

    1,617  1,800     1,206  1,412 

Other liabilities(a)

    2,162  2,269     2,425  2,144 

Long-term debt(a)

    13,456  14,388     14,321  14,904 

Total Liabilities

 $   124,621  125,945  $   124,443  125,808 

Equity

        

Common stock(h)

 $   2,051  2,051 

Preferred stock(i)

    1,331  1,331 

Common stock(g)

 $   2,051  2,051 

Preferred stock(h)

    1,331  1,331 

Capital surplus

    2,751  2,756     2,833  2,790 

Retained earnings

    13,862  13,441     16,143  15,122 

Accumulated other comprehensive income

    163  59 

Treasury stock(h)

    (3,739)  (3,433

Accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income

    (552)  73 

Treasury stock(g)

    (5,574)  (5,002

Total Bancorp shareholders’ equity

 $   16,419  16,205  $   16,232  16,365 

Noncontrolling interests

    27  27       20  20 

Total Equity

    16,446  16,232     16,252  16,385 

Total Liabilities and Equity

 $   141,067  142,177  $   140,695  142,193 
(a)

Includes$5747and $85$62 of cash and due from banks,other short-term investments,$737908and $1,216$1,297 of portfolio loans and leases,$(24)(5) and $(26)$(6) of ALLL,$75and $9$7 of other assets,$12 and $3$2 of other liabilities, and$618830and $1,094$1,190 of long-term debt from consolidated VIEs that are included in their respective captions above atJune 30, 20172018and December 31, 2016,2017, respectively. For further information refer to Note 10.9.

(b)

Amortized cost of$31,49232,589and $31,024$31,577 atJune 30, 20172018and December 31, 2016,2017, respectively.

(c)

Fair value of$2619and $26$24atJune 30, 20172018and December 31, 2016,2017, respectively.

(d)

Includes$674658and $686$399 of residential mortgage loans held for sale measured at fair value and$8and $0 of commercial loans held for sale measured at fair value atJune 30, 20172018and December 31, 2016,2017, respectively.

(e)

Includes$142162and $143$137of residential mortgage loans measured at fair value atJune 30, 20172018and December 31, 2016,2017, respectively.

(f)

Includes$4137and $39$27 of bank premises and equipment held for sale atJune 30, 20172018 and December 31, 2016,2017, respectively. For further information refer to Note 7.

(g)

Effective January 1, 2017, the Bancorp has elected the fair value measurement method for all existing classes of its residential mortgage servicing rights. The servicing rights were measured at fair value atJune 30, 2017 and were measured under the amortization method at December 31, 2016. For further information refer to Note 11.

(h)

Common shares: Stated value $2.22 per share; authorized 2,000,000,000; outstanding at June 30, 20172018738,872,549678,161,855(excludes 185,020,032245,730,726treasury shares), December 31, 20162017750,479,299693,804,893 (excludes 173,413,282230,087,688 treasury shares).

(i)(h)

446,000 shares of undesignated no par value preferred stock are authorized and unissued atJune 30, 20172018andDecember 31, 2016;2017;fixed-to-floating ratenon-cumulative Series H perpetual preferred stock with a $25,000 liquidation preference:24,000authorized shares,issued and outstanding atJune 30, 20172018 and December 31, 2016;2017;fixed-to-floating ratenon-cumulative Series I perpetual preferred stock with a $25,000 liquidation preference;18,000authorized shares, issued and outstanding atJune 30, 20172018 and December 31, 2016;2017; andfixed-to-floating ratenon-cumulative Series J perpetual preferred stock with a $25,000 liquidation preference:12,000authorized shares,issued and outstanding atJune 30, 20172018and December 31, 2016.2017.

Refer to the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

Fifth Third Bancorp and Subsidiaries

Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes (continued)

 

 

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME (unaudited)

           For the three months ended    
    June 30,    
      For the six months ended    
June 30,
 
   

 

 

 
($ in millions, except share data)     2017   2016(a)  2017   2016(a) 

Interest Income

        

Interest and fees on loans and leases

 $   858    808   1,696    1,613 

Interest on securities

    245    236   490    468 

Interest on other short-term investments

     3    2   6    4 

Total interest income

    1,106    1,046   2,192    2,085 

Interest Expense

        

Interest on deposits

    65    50   124    99 

Interest on federal funds purchased

    1    1   2    1 

Interest on other short-term borrowings

    10    3   12    7 

Interest on long-term debt

     91    90   182    173 

Total interest expense

     167    144   320    280 

Net Interest Income

    939    902   1,872    1,805 

Provision for loan and lease losses

     52    91   126    210 

Net Interest Income After Provision for Loan and Lease Losses

    887    811   1,746    1,595 

Noninterest Income

        

Service charges on deposits

    139    138   277    274 

Wealth and asset management revenue

    103    101   211    203 

Corporate banking revenue

    101    117   175    219 

Card and processing revenue

    79    82   153    161 

Mortgage banking net revenue

    55    75   108    154 

Other noninterest income

    85    80   160    215 

Securities gains, net

    -    6   1    9 

Securities gains, net -non-qualifying hedges on mortgage servicing rights

     2    -   2    - 

Total noninterest income

    564    599   1,087    1,235 

Noninterest Expense

        

Salaries, wages and incentives

    397    407   808    810 

Employee benefits

    86    85   196    185 

Net occupancy expense

    70    75   148    152 

Technology and communications

    57    60   116    116 

Card and processing expense

    33    37   63    72 

Equipment expense

    29    30   57    60 

Other noninterest expense

     285    289   555    573 

Total noninterest expense

     957    983   1,943    1,968 

Income Before Income Taxes

    494    427   890    862 

Applicable income tax expense

     127    103   218    212 

Net Income

    367    324   672    650 

Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests

     -    (4  -    (4

Net Income Attributable to Bancorp

    367    328   672    654 

Dividends on preferred stock

     23    23   38    38 

Net Income Available to Common Shareholders

 $   344    305   634    616 

Earnings per share - basic

 $   0.46    0.40   0.84    0.80 

Earnings per share - diluted

 $   0.45    0.39   0.83    0.79 

Average common shares outstanding - basic

    741,400,700    759,105,385   744,516,799    766,334,781 

Average common shares outstanding - diluted

    752,328,298    764,811,003   756,545,341    771,284,468 

Cash dividends declared per common share

 $   0.14    0.13   0.28    0.26 
(a)

Net tax deficiencies of $5 and $6 were reclassified from capital surplus to applicable income tax expense and average common shares outstanding – diluted were adjusted for the three and six months ended June 30, 2016, respectively, related to the early adoption of ASU2016-09 during the fourth quarter of 2016, with an effective date of January 1, 2016.

           For the three months ended    
    June 30,    
       For the six months ended    
June 30,
 
   

 

 

 
($ in millions, except share data)     2018  2017   2018  2017 

Interest Income

       

Interest and fees on loans and leases

 $   996   858    1,933   1,696 

Interest on securities

    267   245    530   490 

Interest on other short-term investments

     6   3    11   6 

Total interest income

    1,269   1,106    2,474   2,192 

Interest Expense

       

Interest on deposits

    119   65    215   124 

Interest on federal funds purchased

    5   1    7   2 

Interest on other short-term borrowings

    11   10    19   12 

Interest on long-term debt

     114   91    217   182 

Total interest expense

     249   167    458   320 

Net Interest Income

    1,020   939    2,016   1,872 

Provision for loan and lease losses

     33   52    56   126 

Net Interest Income After Provision for Loan and Lease Losses

    987   887    1,960   1,746 

Noninterest Income

       

Service charges on deposits

    137   139    275   277 

Wealth and asset management revenue

    108   103    221   211 

Corporate banking revenue

    120   101    208   175 

Card and processing revenue

    84   79    163   153 

Mortgage banking net revenue

    53   55    109   108 

Other noninterest income

    250   85    708   160 

Securities (losses) gains, net

    (5  -    (15  1 

Securities (losses) gains, net -non-qualifying hedges on mortgage servicing rights

     (4  2    (17  2 

Total noninterest income

    743   564    1,652   1,087 

Noninterest Expense

       

Salaries, wages and incentives

    471   397    918   808 

Employee benefits

    78   86    188   196 

Net occupancy expense

    74   70    149   148 

Technology and communications

    67   57    135   116 

Equipment expense

    30   29    61   57 

Card and processing expense

    30   33    60   63 

Other noninterest expense

     287   285    572   555 

Total noninterest expense

     1,037   957    2,083   1,943 

Income Before Income Taxes

    693   494    1,529   890 

Applicable income tax expense

     107   127    239   218 

Net Income

    586   367    1,290   672 

Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests

     -   -    -   - 

Net Income Attributable to Bancorp

    586   367    1,290   672 

Dividends on preferred stock

     23   23    38   38 

Net Income Available to Common Shareholders

 $   563   344    1,252   634 

Earnings per share - basic

 $   0.81   0.46    1.80   0.84 

Earnings per share - diluted

 $   0.80   0.45    1.77   0.83 

Average common shares outstanding - basic

    683,344,844   741,400,700    686,564,682   744,516,799 

Average common shares outstanding - diluted

    696,209,943   752,328,298    700,133,642   756,545,341 

Cash dividends declared per common share

 $   0.18   0.14    0.34   0.28 

Refer to the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

Fifth Third Bancorp and Subsidiaries

Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes (continued)

 

 

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (unaudited)

 

          For the three months ended     
     June 30,      
       For the six months ended    
     June 30,      
($ in millions)     2017  2016(a)   2017      2016(a)    

Net Income

 $  367   324   672   650 

Other Comprehensive Income, Net of Tax:

         

Unrealized gains onavailable-for-sale securities:

         

Unrealized holding gains arising during period

   93   200   108   652 

Reclassification adjustment for net losses (gains) included in net income

     (6)    (11)

Unrealized gains on cash flow hedge derivatives:

         

Unrealized holding gains arising during period

     17     65 

Reclassification adjustment for net gains included in net income

   (4)  (8)  (9)  (17) 

Defined benefit pension plans, net:

         

Reclassification of amounts to net periodic benefit costs

          

Other comprehensive income, net of tax

    95   205   104   692 

Comprehensive Income

   462   529   776   1,342 

Less: Comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interests

      (4)    (4)

Comprehensive Income Attributable to Bancorp

 $  462   533   776   1,346 
(a)

Net tax deficiencies of $5 and $6 were reclassified from capital surplus to applicable income tax expense for the three and six months ended June 30, 2016, respectively, related to the early adoption of ASU2016-09 during the fourth quarter of 2016, with an effective date of January 1, 2016.

          For the three months ended     
June 30,
       For the six months ended     
June 30,
($ in millions)     2018  2017  2018  2017

Net Income

 $  586   367   1,290   672 

Other Comprehensive (Loss) Income, Net of Tax:

         

Unrealized (losses) gains onavailable-for-sale debt securities:

         

Unrealized holding (losses) gains arising during period

   (167)  93   (627)  108 

Reclassification adjustment for net losses included in net income

         

Unrealized (losses) gains on cash flow hedge derivatives:

         

Unrealized holding (losses) gains arising during period

       (4)  

Reclassification adjustment for net gains included in net income

     (4)  (1)  (9)

Defined benefit pension plans, net:

         

Reclassification of amounts to net periodic benefit costs

          

Other comprehensive (loss) income, net of tax

    (163)  95   (623)  104 

Comprehensive Income

   423   462   667   776 

Less: Comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interests

          

Comprehensive Income Attributable to Bancorp

 $  423   462   667   776 

Refer to the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

Fifth Third Bancorp and Subsidiaries

Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes (continued)

 

 

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN EQUITY (unaudited)

    

Bancorp Shareholders’ Equity

          Bancorp Shareholders’ Equity      
($ in millions, except per share data)    Common
Stock
 Preferred
Stock
 Capital
Surplus(b)
 Retained
Earnings(b)
 Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income
 Treasury
Stock
 Total
Bancorp
Shareholders’
Equity
 Non-
Controlling
Interests
 Total  
Equity  
    Common
Stock
 Preferred
Stock
 Capital
Surplus
 Retained
Earnings
 Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
(Loss) Income
 Treasury
Stock
 Total
Bancorp
Shareholders’
Equity
 Non-
Controlling
Interests
 Total  
Equity  

Balance at December 31, 2015

 $ 2,051 1,331  2,666  12,358  197  (2,764 15,839  31  15,870 

Net income

     654    654  (4) 650 

Other comprehensive income, net of tax

      692   692   692 

Cash dividends declared:

          

Common stock at $0.26 per share

     (201   (201  (201)

Preferred stock(a)

     (38   (38  (38)

Shares acquired for treasury

    31    (296 (265  (265)

Impact of stock transactions under stock compensation plans, net

    63    (18 45   45 

Other

 (1 1   -   

Balance at June 30, 2016

 $ 2,051 1,331  2,760  12,772  889  (3,077 16,726  28  16,754 
 

Balance at December 31, 2016

 $ 2,051  1,331   2,756   13,441   59   (3,433  16,205  27  16,232  $   2,051  1,331  2,756  13,441  59  (3,433 16,205  27  16,232 

Net income

      672     672   672      672    672   672 

Other comprehensive income, net of tax

       104    104   104       104   104   104 

Cash dividends declared:

                    

Common stock at $0.28 per share

      (210    (210  (210)     (210   (210  (210)

Preferred stock(a)

      (38    (38  (38)     (38   (38  (38)

Shares acquired for treasury

     (26    (316  (342  (342)    (26   (316 (342  (342)

Impact of stock transactions under stock compensation plans, net

     21     8   29   29     21    8  29   29 

Other

  (3  2   (1 (1) (3 2  (1 (1)

Balance at June 30, 2017

 $ 2,051  1,331   2,751   13,862   163   (3,739  16,419  27  16,446  $   2,051  1,331  2,751  13,862  163  (3,739 16,419  27 16,446 
 

Balance at December 31, 2017

 $    2,051   1,331   2,790   15,122   73   (5,002  16,365  20 16,385 

Impact of cumulative effect of change in accounting principles(b)

  6   (2  4  

Balance at January 1, 2018

 $    2,051   1,331   2,790   15,128   71   (5,002  16,369  20 16,389 

Net income

      1,290     1,290   1,290 

Other comprehensive loss, net of tax

       (623   (623  (623)

Cash dividends declared:

          

Common stock at $0.34 per share

      (235    (235  (235)

Preferred stock(a)

      (38    (38  (38)

Shares acquired for treasury

     41     (594  (553  (553)

Impact of stock transactions under stock compensation plans, net

     2     20   22   22 

Other

  (2  2   -  -  

Balance at June 30, 2018

 $    2,051   1,331   2,833   16,143   (552  (5,574  16,232  20 16,252 
(a)

For both the six months endedJune 30, 20172018and 2016,2017, dividends were$637.50 per preferred shareshares for Perpetual Preferred Stock, Series H;H,$828.12per preferred share for Perpetual Preferred Stock, Series I;I and$612.50 per preferred share for Perpetual Preferred Stock, Series J.

(b)

Net tax deficiencies of $6 were reclassified from capital surplus to applicable income tax expense for the six months ended June 30, 2016, relatedRelated to the early adoption of ASU2016-09 during the fourth quarter of 2016, with an effective dateas of January 1, 2016.2018 of ASU2016-01, ASU2017-12 and ASU2018-02. Refer to Note 3 for additional information.

Refer to the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

Fifth Third Bancorp and Subsidiaries

Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes (continued)

 

 

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (unaudited)
       

        For the six months ended June 30,    

($ in millions)     2017      2016(a)    

Operating Activities

     

Net income

 $  672   650 

Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:

     

Provision for loan and lease losses

   126   210 

Depreciation, amortization and accretion

   170   228 

Stock-based compensation expense

   69   63 

(Benefit from) provision for deferred income taxes

   (5)  

Securities gains, net

   (1)  (8)

Securities gains, net -non-qualifying hedges on mortgage servicing rights

   (2)  

MSR fair value adjustment

   70   

Provision for MSR impairment

     131 

Net gains on sales of loans and fair value adjustments on loans held for sale

   (57)  (54)

Net losses (gains) on disposition and impairment of bank premises and equipment

     (2)

Gains on sales of certain retail branch operations

     (19)

Net losses on disposition and impairment of operating lease equipment

   19   

Proceeds from sales of loans held for sale

   3,141   2,774 

Loans originated for sale, net of repayments

   (3,078)  (3,053)

Dividends representing return on equity method investments

   18   11 

Net change in:

     

Trading securities

   (427)  (14)

Other assets

   (38)  195 

Accrued taxes, interest and expenses

   (245)  (349)

Other liabilities

    214   (70)

Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities

    648   702 

Investing Activities

     

Proceeds from sales:

     

Available-for-sale securities

   4,633   8,886 

Loans

   92   145 

Bank premises and equipment

   18   28 

Proceeds from repayments / maturities:

     

Available-for-sale securities

   1,178   1,342 

Held-to-maturity securities

     

Purchases:

     

Available-for-sale securities

   (5,828)  (11,620)

Bank premises and equipment

   (111)  (87)

MSRs

   (109)  

Proceeds from sales and dividends representing return of equity method investments

   85   29 

Net cash paid on sales of certain retail branch operations

     (219)

Net cash paid on acquisitions

   (12)  

Net change in:

     

Other short-term investments

   591   853 

Loans and leases

   350   (1,534)

Operating lease equipment

    (43)  (95)

Net Cash Provided by (Used in) Investing Activities

    844   (2,264)

Financing Activities

     

Net change in:

     

Deposits

   (1,941)  (804)

Federal funds purchased

   (15)  (43)

Other short-term borrowings

   1,854   2,472 

Dividends paid on common stock

   (235)  (202)

Dividends paid on preferred stock

   (38)  (38)

Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt

   697   2,739 

Repayment of long-term debt

   (1,631)  (2,452)

Repurchase of treasury stock and related forward contract

   (342)  (265)

Other

    (30)  (26)

Net Cash (Used in) Provided by Financing Activities

    (1,681)  1,381 

Decrease in Cash and Due from Banks

   (189)  (181)

Cash and Due from Banks at Beginning of Period

    2,392   2,540 

Cash and Due from Banks at End of Period

 $  2,203   2,359 
(a)

Net tax deficiencies of $6 were reclassified from capital surplus to applicable income tax expense for the six months ended June 30, 2016, related to the early adoption of ASU2016-09 during the fourth quarter of 2016, with an effective date of January 1, 2016.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (unaudited)
       

        For the six months ended June 30,    

($ in millions)     2018      2017    

Operating Activities

     

Net income

 $  1,290   672 

Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:

     

Provision for loan and lease losses

   56   126 

Depreciation, amortization and accretion

   226   170 

Stock-based compensation expense

   80   69 

Provision for (benefit from) deferred income taxes

     (5)

Securities losses (gains), net

   17   (1)

Securities losses (gains), net -non-qualifying hedges on mortgage servicing rights

   17   (2)

MSR fair value adjustment

   (16)  70 

Net gains on sales of loans and fair value adjustments on loans held for sale

   (36)  (57)

Net losses on disposition and impairment of bank premises and equipment

   41   

Net losses on disposition and impairment of operating lease equipment

     19 

Gain related to Vantiv, Inc.’s acquisition of Worldpay Group plc.

   (414)  

Gain on sale of Worldpay, Inc. shares

   (205)  

Proceeds from sales of loans held for sale

   2,557   3,141 

Loans originated for sale, net of repayments

   (2,821)  (3,078)

Dividends representing return on equity method investments

     18 

Net change in:

     

Trading and equity securities

   151   (427)

Other assets

   316   (44)

Accrued taxes, interest and expenses

   (30)  (245)

Other liabilities

    51   214 

Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities

    1,293   642 

Investing Activities

     

Proceeds from sales:

     

Available-for-sale debt and other securities

   10,283   4,633 

Loans

   113   92 

Bank premises and equipment

   28   18 

Proceeds from repayments / maturities:

     

Available-for-sale debt and other securities

   997   1,178

Held-to-maturity securities

     

Purchases:

     

Available-for-sale debt and other securities

   (12,194)  (5,828)

Bank premises and equipment

   (98)  (111)

MSRs

   (50)  (109)

Proceeds from settlement of BOLI

     

Proceeds from sales and dividends representing return of equity method investments

   563   85 

Net cash paid on acquisitions

   (20)  (12)

Net change in:

     

Other short-term investments

   1,117   591 

Loans and leases

   (264)  350 

Operating lease equipment

    (3)  (43)

Net Cash Provided by Investing Activities

    484   850 

Financing Activities

     

Net change in:

     

Deposits

   969   (1,941)

Federal funds purchased

   423   (15)

Other short-term borrowings

   (2,249)  1,854 

Dividends paid on common stock

   (223)  (235)

Dividends paid on preferred stock

   (38)  (38)

Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt

   895   697 

Repayment of long-term debt

   (1,397)  (1,631)

Repurchase of treasury stock and related forward contract

   (553)  (342)

Other

    (66)  (30)

Net Cash Used in Financing Activities

    (2,239)  (1,681)

Decrease in Cash and Due from Banks

   (462)  (189)

Cash and Due from Banks at Beginning of Period

    2,514   2,392 

Cash and Due from Banks at End of Period

 $  2,052   2,203 

Refer to the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements. Note 2 contains cash payments related to interest and income taxes in addition tonon-cash investing and financing activities.

Fifth Third Bancorp and Subsidiaries

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)

 

1. Basis of Presentation

The Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements include the accounts of the Bancorp and its majority-owned subsidiaries and VIEs in which the Bancorp has been determined to be the primary beneficiary. Other entities, including certain joint ventures, in which the Bancorp has the ability to exercise significant influence over operating and financial policies of the investee, but upon which the Bancorp does not possess control, are accounted for by the equity method and not consolidated. Those entities in which the Bancorp does not have the ability to exercise significant influence are generally carriedaccounted for utilizing the measurement alternative to fair value which permits carrying the investment at the lower ofits cost or fair value.basis, as adjusted for impairments and observable price changes. Intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated.

In the opinion of management, the unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements include all adjustments, which consist of normal recurring accruals, necessary to present fairly the results for the periods presented. In accordance with U.S. GAAP and the rules and regulations of the SEC for interim financial information, these statements do not include certain information and footnote disclosures required for complete annual financial statements and it is suggested that these Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements be read in conjunction with the Bancorp’s Annual Report on Form10-K. The results of operations and comprehensive income for the three and six months ended June 30, 20172018 and 20162017 and the cash flows and changes in equity for the six months ended June 30, 20172018 and 20162017 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full year. Financial information as of December 31, 20162017 has been derived from the Bancorp’s Annual Report on Form10-K.

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

2. Supplemental Cash Flow Information

Cash payments related to interest and income taxes in addition tonon-cash investing and financing activities are presented in the following table for the six months ended June 30:

 

($ in millions)  2017     2016       2018     2017    

Cash Payments:

      

Interest

  $        334  280   $        451 334

Income taxes

   399  493   120 399

Transfers:

      

Portfolio loans to loans held for sale

   140  27   171 140

Loans held for sale to portfolio loans

   7  16   67 7

Portfolio loans to OREO

   19  17   20 19

3. Accounting and Reporting Developments

Standards Adopted in 20172018

The Bancorp adopted the following new accounting standards effective January 1, 2017:2018:

ASU2016-052014-09DerivativesRevenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606)

In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU2014-09 which outlines a single comprehensive model for entities to use in accounting for revenue arising from contracts with customers and Hedging (Topic 815): Effectsupersedes most contract revenue recognition guidance, including industry-specific guidance. The core principle of Derivative Contract Novationsthe amended guidance is that an entity should recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. Subsequent to the issuance of ASU2014-09, the FASB issued additional guidance to clarify certain implementation issues, including ASUs2016-08 (Principal versus Agent Considerations),2016-10 (Identifying Performance Obligations and Licensing),2016-12 (Narrow-Scope Improvements and Practical Expedients), and2016-20 (Technical Corrections and Improvements) in March, April, May and December 2016, respectively. These amendments did not change the core principles in ASU2014-09 and follow the same effective date and transition requirements. The Bancorp adopted the amended guidance on Existing Hedge Accounting RelationshipsJanuary 1, 2018, using a modified retrospective approach. Because the amended guidance does not apply to revenue associated with financial instruments, including loans and securities that are accounted for under other U.S. GAAP, the adoption of this amended guidance did not have a material impact on the Bancorp’s Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements. However, the Bancorp is subject to expanded disclosure requirements and has updated its revenue recognition policies and procedures. While the Bancorp has concluded the following changes are not material to its Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, upon adoption the Bancorp changed its presentation of certain underwriting expenses incurred by its broker-dealer subsidiary from net to gross presentation and also changed its presentation of certain credit card rewards program expenses from gross to net presentation. Neither change impacts income before income taxes or net income.

In conjunction with adoption of ASU2014-09, the Bancorp is providing the following additional disclosures about its significant accounting and reporting policies related to revenue recognition.

Revenue Recognition

The Bancorp generally measures revenue based on the amount of consideration the Bancorp expects to be entitled for the transfer of goods or services to a customer, then recognizes this revenue when or as the Bancorp satisfies its performance obligations under the contract, except in transactions where U.S. GAAP provides other applicable guidance.

Fifth Third Bancorp and Subsidiaries

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)

When the amount of consideration is variable, the Bancorp will only recognize revenue to the extent that it is probable that the cumulative amount recognized will not be subject to a significant reversal in the future. Substantially all of the Bancorp’s contracts with customers have expected durations of one year or less and payments are typically due when or as the services are rendered or shortly thereafter. When third parties are involved in providing goods or services to customers, the Bancorp recognizes revenue on a gross basis when it has control over those goods or services prior to transfer to the customer; otherwise, revenue is recognized for the net amount of any fee or commission. The Bancorp excludes sales taxes from the recognition of revenue and recognizes the incremental costs of obtaining contracts as an expense if the period of amortization for those costs would be one year or less.

The Bancorp’s interest income is derived from loans and leases, securities and other short-term investments. The Bancorp recognizes interest income in accordance with the applicable guidance in U.S. GAAP for these assets. Refer to the Portfolio Loans and Leases and Securities sections in Note 1 of the Bancorp’s Annual Report on Form10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017 for further information. The following provides additional information about the components of noninterest income:

Service charges on deposits consist primarily of treasury management fees for commercial clients, monthly service charges on consumer deposit accounts, transaction-based fees (such as overdraft fees and wire transfer fees), and other deposit account-related charges. The Bancorp’s performance obligations for treasury management fees and consumer deposit account service charges are typically satisfied over time while performance obligations for transaction-based fees are typically satisfied at a point in time. Revenues are recognized on an accrual basis when or as the services are provided to the customer, net of applicable discounts, waivers and reversals. Payments are typically collected from customers directly from the related deposit account at the time the transaction is processed and/or at the end of the customer’s statement cycle (typically monthly).

Wealth and asset management revenue consists primarily of service fees for investment management, custody, and trust administration services provided to commercial and consumer clients. The Bancorp’s performance obligations for these services are generally satisfied over time and revenues are recognized monthly based on the fee structure outlined in individual contracts. Transaction prices are most commonly based on the market value of assets under management or care and/or a fee per transaction processed. The Bancorp offers certain services, like tax return preparation, for which the performance obligations are satisfied and revenue is recognized at a point in time, when the services are performed. Wealth and asset management revenue also includes trailing commissions received from investments and annuities held in customer accounts, which are recognized in revenue when the Bancorp determines it is probable that the commission will be received.

Corporate banking revenue consists primarily of service fees and other income related to loans and leases to commercial clients, underwriting revenue recognized by the Bancorp’s broker-dealer subsidiary and fees for other services provided to commercial clients. Revenue related to loans and leases is recognized in accordance with the Bancorp’s policies for portfolio loans and leases. Underwriting revenue is generally recognized on the trade date, which is when the Bancorp’s performance obligations are satisfied.

Card and processing revenue consists primarily of ATM fees and interchange fees earned when the Bancorp’s credit and debit cards are processed through card association networks. The Bancorp’s performance obligations are generally complete when the transactions generating the fees are processed. Revenue is recognized on an accrual basis as such services are performed, net of certain costs not controlled by the Bancorp (primarily interchange fees charged by credit card associations and expenses of certain transaction-based rewards programs offered to customers). These costs reduced card and processing revenue by approximately $31 million and $60 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2018, respectively.

Mortgage banking net revenue consists primarily of origination fees and gains on loan sales, mortgage servicing fees and the impact of MSRs. Refer to the Loans and Leases Held for Sale and Loan Sales and Securitizations sections in Note 1 of the Bancorp’s Annual Report on Form10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017 for further information.

Other noninterest income includes income from operating leases, certain fees derived from loans and leases, BOLI income, gains and losses on other assets, and other miscellaneous revenues and gains.

ASU2016-01 – Financial Instruments—Overall (Subtopic825-10): Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities

In January 2016, the FASB issued ASU2016-01 which revises an entity’s accounting related to 1) the classification and measurement of investments in equity securities, 2) the presentation of certain fair value changes for financial liabilities measured at fair value, and 3) certain disclosure requirements associated with the fair value of financial instruments. The amendments require equity investments (except those accounted for under the equity method of accounting or those that result in consolidation of the investee) to be measured at fair value with changes in fair value recognized in net income. However, an entity may choose to measure equity investments that do not have readily determinable fair values at cost minus impairment, if any, plus or minus changes as a result of an observable price change. The amendments also simplify the impairment assessment of equity investments for which fair value is not readily determinable by requiring an entity to perform a qualitative assessment to identify impairment. If qualitative indicators are identified, the entity will be required to measure the investment at fair value. For financial liabilities that an entity has elected to measure at fair value, the amendments require an entity to present separately in OCI the portion of the change in fair value that results from a change in instrument-specific credit risk. For public business entities, the amendments 1) eliminate the requirement to disclose the method(s) and significant assumptions used to estimate fair value for financial instruments measured at amortized cost and 2) require, for disclosure purposes, the use of an exit price notion in the determination of the fair value of financial instruments. In February 2018, the FASB also issued ASU2018-03 which makes technical corrections and improvements to the amendments in ASU2016-01. The Bancorp adopted the amended guidance on January 1, 2018. As permitted, the Bancorp elected to early adopt ASU2018-03 on January 1, 2018, concurrent with the adoption of ASU2016-01. The adoption did not have a material impact on the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements. However, equity securities affected by the amended guidance which were previously classified as trading oravailable-for-sale have been reclassified in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as equity securities. For certain equity securities without a readily determinable fair value that are not accounted for using the equity method, the Bancorp has elected to use the permitted measurement alternative, which is to adjust the cost basis of the investment upon either the occurrence of an observable price change or the identification of an impairment. For these securities, the amended guidance was applied prospectively to investments that existed on or after January 1, 2018. The other portions of the amended guidance were applied on a modified retrospective basis.

Fifth Third Bancorp and Subsidiaries

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)

ASU2016-04 – Liabilities—Extinguishments of Liabilities (Subtopic405-20): Recognition of Breakage for Certain Prepaid Stored-Value Products

In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU2016-052016-04 which clarifiespermits proportional derecognition of the liability for unused funds on certain prepaid stored-value products (known as breakage) to the extent that it is probable that a change in counterparty insignificant reversal of the recognized breakage amount will not subsequently occur. The amendments do not apply to any prepaid stored-value products that are attached to a derivative contract does not, in and of itself, represent a change in critical terms that would require discontinuation of hedge accounting provided that other hedge accounting criteria continuesegregated customer deposit account or products for which unused funds are subject to be met.unclaimed property remittance laws. The Bancorp adopted the amended guidance prospectively on January 1, 2017.2018 using a modified retrospective approach. The adoption did not have a material impact on the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

ASU2016-062016-15DerivativesStatement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Hedging (Topic 815): Contingent Put and Call Options in Debt InstrumentsCash Payments

In MarchAugust 2016, the FASB issued ASU2016-062016-15 which clarifiesto clarify the requirements for determining when contingent putclassification of certain cash receipts and call options embedded inpayments within an entity’s statement of cash flows. These items include debt prepayment or extinguishment costs, settlement ofzero-coupon debt instruments, should be bifurcatedcontingent consideration payments made after a business combination, proceeds from the debt instrumentsettlement of insurance claims, proceeds from the settlement of BOLI policies, distributions received from equity method investees, and accounted for separately as derivatives. A four-step decision sequence should be followedbeneficial interests in determining whether such options are clearlysecuritization transactions. The amended guidance also specifies how to address classification of cash receipts and closely related to the economic characteristics and riskspayments that have aspects of the debt instrument, which determines whether bifurcation is necessary.more than one class of cash flows. The Bancorp adopted the amended guidance retrospectively on January 1, 2017 on a modified retrospective basis.2018. The adoption did not have a material impact on the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

ASU2016-072016-16Investments—Equity Method and Joint VenturesIncome Taxes (Topic 323)740): Simplifying the Transition to the Equity MethodIntra-Entity Transfers of AccountingAssets Other Than Inventory

In MarchOctober 2016, the FASB issued ASU2016-072016-16 which requires an entity to eliminaterecognize the requirement that when an investment qualifies for use of the equity method as a resultincome tax consequences of an increase inintra-entity transfer of an asset other than inventory when the leveltransfer occurs. Current U.S. GAAP prohibits the recognition of ownership interest or degree of influence,current and deferred income taxes for an investor must adjustintra-entity asset transfer until the investment, results of operations and retained earnings retroactively on astep-by-step basis as if the equity method hadasset has been in effect during all previous periods that the investment had been held. The amendments require that the equity method investor add the cost of acquiring the additional interest in the investeesold to the current basis of the investor’s previously held interest and adopt the equity method of accounting as of the date the investment becomes qualified for equity method accounting, eliminating the requirement to retrospectively apply the equity method of accounting back to the date of the initial investment.an outside party. The Bancorp adopted the amended guidance prospectively on January 1, 2017.2018 using a modified retrospective approach. The adoption did not have a material impact on the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

ASU2016-172017-01ConsolidationBusiness Combinations (Topic 810)805): Interests Held Through Related Parties That Are Under Common ControlClarifying the Definition of a Business

In October 2016,January 2017, the FASB issued ASU2016-172017-01 which changesclarifies the definition of a business in order to assist entities with evaluating whether transactions should be accounted for as acquisitions (or disposals) of assets or businesses. The amended guidance provides a screen which states that when substantially all of the fair value of assets acquired (or disposed) is concentrated in a single asset or group of similar assets, then the set of assets and activities would not be considered a business. The Bancorp adopted the amended guidance prospectively on January 1, 2018 and will apply this amended guidance to future transactions to determine if they should be accounted for as acquisitions (or disposals) of assets or businesses.

ASU2017-05 – Other Income—Gains and Losses from the Derecognition of Nonfinancial Assets (Subtopic610-20): Clarifying the Scope of Asset Derecognition Guidance and Accounting for Partial Sales of Nonfinancial Assets

In February 2017, the FASB issued ASU2017-05 which clarifies the scope of Subtopic610-20 and defines the term “in substance nonfinancial asset.” The amendments require that an entity should initially identify each distinct nonfinancial asset or in substance nonfinancial asset promised to a counterparty and derecognize each asset when a counterparty obtains control of it. The amendments provide specific guidance on accounting for the consolidationpartial sales of VIEsnonfinancial assets, which require an entity to derecognize a distinct nonfinancial asset or in certain situations involving entities under common control. Specifically, the amendments change how the indirect interests held through related parties that are under common control should be includedsubstance nonfinancial asset in a reporting entity’s evaluationpartial sale transaction when it 1) does not have (or ceases to have) a controlling financial interest in the legal entity that holds the asset and 2) transfers control of whetherthe asset. Once an entity transfers control of a distinct nonfinancial asset or distinct in substance nonfinancial asset, it is required to measure any noncontrolling interest it receives (or retains) at fair value. The Bancorp adopted the amended guidance on January 1, 2018 using a primary beneficiarymodified retrospective approach. The adoption did not have a material impact on the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

ASU2017-09 Compensation—Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Scope of Modification Accounting

In May 2017, the FASB issued ASU2017-09 which provides guidance about which changes to the terms or conditions of a VIE.

share-based payment award require the application of modification accounting in Topic 718. The amendments specify that an entity should account for the effects of such changes as a modification unless the fair value, vesting conditions and classification (as an equity or liability) of the awards are all unaffected by the change. The Bancorp adopted the amended guidance prospectively on January 1, 2018. The adoption did not have a material impact on the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

ASU2017-12 Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815): Targeted Improvements to Accounting for Hedging Activities

In August 2017, the FASB issued ASU2017-12 which makes several amendments to existing guidance for hedge accounting. As permitted, the Bancorp elected to early adopt the amended guidance on January 1, 2018. For certain fair value hedges of interest rate risk, the Bancorp elected to modify the measurement methodology for the hedged item to be the benchmark rate component of the contractual coupon cash flows and also elected tode-designate a portion of the existing hedging relationship, as permitted. Upon adoption, changes in the fair value of cash flow hedges are recorded in AOCI and then subsequently reclassified into earnings when the hedged item affects earnings. Also, for both fair value hedges and cash flow hedges, changes in the fair value of the derivative instrument are recorded in the same income statement line item as the effects of the hedged item, eliminating the separate measurement of hedge ineffectiveness. The Bancorp recorded a cumulative-effect adjustment to retained earnings for the impact of these elections as well as the elimination of the separate measurement of ineffectiveness from AOCI for cash flow hedges existing at January 1, 2018, the amount of which was not material. The amended presentation and disclosure guidance was applied prospectively.

Fifth Third Bancorp and Subsidiaries

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)

 

 

UnderASU2018-02 Income Statement—Reporting Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Reclassification of Certain Tax Effects from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income

In February 2018, the FASB issued ASU2018-02 which allows for reclassification from AOCI to retained earnings of stranded tax effects resulting from the TCJA. Stranded tax effects result from the reduction in the top federal statutory income tax rate from 35 percent to 21 percent as deferred tax assets and liabilities are adjusted for the impact of a change in tax rate through income tax expense, even in situations when the related items giving rise to the deferred taxes are components of AOCI, which are carried net of tax. As permitted, the Bancorp elected to early adopt this amended guidance the reporting entity is only requiredand recorded a reclassification adjustment from AOCI to include the indirect interests held through related parties that are under common control in a VIE on a proportionate basis. The Bancorp adopted the amended guidance retrospectively onretained earnings as of January 1, 2017. The adoption did2018, the amount of which was not have a material impact on the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.material.

Standards Issued but Not Yet Adopted

The following accounting standards were issued but not yet adopted by the Bancorp as of June 30, 2017:

ASU2014-09 – Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606)

In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU2014-09 which outlines a single comprehensive model for entities to use in accounting for revenue arising from contracts with customers and supersedes most contract revenue recognition guidance, including industry-specific guidance. The core principle of the amended guidance is that an entity should recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. Subsequent to the issuance of ASU2014-09, the FASB has issued additional guidance to clarify certain implementation issues, including ASUs2016-08 (Principal versus Agent Considerations),2016-10 (Identifying Performance Obligations and Licensing),2016-12 (Narrow-Scope Improvements and Practical Expedients), and2016-20 (Technical Corrections and Improvements) in March, April, May and December 2016, respectively. These amendments do not change the core principles in ASU2014-09 and the effective date and transition requirements are consistent with those in the original ASU. The Bancorp plans to adopt the amended guidance on its required effective date of January 1, 2018, using a modified retrospective approach, with the cumulative effect of initially applying the amendments recognized at the date of initial application. Because the amended guidance does not apply to revenue associated with financial instruments, including loans and securities that are accounted for under other U.S. GAAP, the Bancorp’s preliminary analysis suggests that the adoption of this amended guidance is not expected to have a material impact on its Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, although the Bancorp will also be subject to expanded disclosure requirements upon adoption and will be required to update its revenue recognition policies and procedures. There are certain areas of the amended guidance for which the Bancorp has not made final conclusions regarding the applicability and the related impact, if any. Such areas include credit card interchange fees and related rewards programs and the presentation of certain underwriting expenses incurred by broker-dealers. Accordingly, the results of the Bancorp’s materiality analysis, as well as its final adoption method, may change as these conclusions are reached.

ASU2016-01 – Financial Instruments—Overall (Subtopic825-10): Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities

In January 2016, the FASB issued ASU2016-01 which revises an entity’s accounting related to 1) the classification and measurement of investments in equity securities, 2) the presentation of certain fair value changes for financial liabilities measured at fair value, and 3) certain disclosure requirements associated with the fair value of financial instruments. The amendments require equity investments (except those accounted for under the equity method of accounting or those that result in consolidation of the investee) to be measured at fair value with changes in fair value recognized in net income. However, an entity may choose to measure equity investments that do not have readily determinable fair values at cost minus impairment, if any, plus or minus changes as a result of an observable price change. The amendments also simplify the impairment assessment of equity investments for which fair value is not readily determinable by requiring an entity to perform a qualitative assessment to identify impairment. If qualitative indicators are identified, the entity will be required to measure the investment at fair value. For financial liabilities that an entity has elected to measure at fair value, the amendments require an entity to present separately in other comprehensive income the portion of the change in fair value that results from a change in instrument-specific credit risk. For public business entities, the amendments 1) eliminate the requirement to disclose the method(s) and significant assumptions used to estimate fair value for financial instruments measured at amortized cost and 2) require, for disclosure purposes, the use of an exit price notion in the determination of the fair value of financial instruments. The Bancorp plans to adopt the amended guidance on its required effective date of January 1, 2018. Upon adoption, the Bancorp will be required to make a cumulative-effect adjustment to the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of the beginning of the fiscal year of adoption. However, for equity securities without a readily determinable fair value, the guidance will be applied prospectively to all equity investments that exist as of the date of adoption. Early adoption of the amendments is not permitted with the exception of the presentation of certain fair value changes for financial liabilities measured at fair value for which early application is permitted. The Bancorp is currently in the process of evaluating the impact of the amended guidance on its Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, but does not currently expect the impact of adoption to be material based on the results of its preliminary analysis.2018:

ASU2016-02 – Leases (Topic 842)

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU2016-02 which establishes a new accounting model for leases. The amended guidance requires lessees to record lease liabilities on the lessees’ balance sheets along with correspondingright-of-use assets for all leases with terms longer than twelve months. Leases will be classified as either finance or operating, with classification affecting the pattern of expense recognition in the lessee’s statements of income. From a lessor perspective, the accounting model is largely unchanged, except that the amended guidance includes certain targeted improvements to align, where necessary, lessor accounting with the lessee accounting model and the revenue recognition guidance in ASC Topic 606. The amendments also modify disclosure requirements for an entity’s lease arrangements. The amended guidance is effective for the Bancorp on January 1, 2019, with early adoption permitted. The amendments should be applied to each prior reporting period presented using a modified retrospective approach, although the amended guidance contains certain transition relief provisions that, among other things, permit an entity to elect not to reassess the classification of leases which existed or expired as of the date the amendments are effective. In January 2018, the FASB issued ASU2018-01 which provides a practical expedient for transition related to land easements. The FASB has also proposed additional amendments to the new guidance which, among other things, include an option to recognize a cumulative effect adjustment to retained earnings in the period of adoption instead of applying the guidance to prior comparative periods, but these additional amendments are not yet final. The Bancorp will adopt the amended guidance on the required effective date of January 1, 2019, and expects to elect the transition relief provisions. From a lessee perspective, the Bancorp is currently in the process of developing anfinalizing its inventory of all leases, and accumulating the lease data necessary to apply the amended guidance.guidance, and evaluating the business process and technology requirements which will be necessary after adoption. The Bancorp is continuing to evaluate the impact of the amended guidance on its Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, but the effects of recognizing most operating leases on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets are expected to be material. The Bancorp expects to recognizeright-of-use assets and lease liabilities for substantially all of its operating lease commitments based on the present value of unpaid lease payments as of the date of adoption.

Fifth Thirdadoption, but does not expect a material impact to expense recognition. From a lessor perspective, given the limited changes, the Bancorp and Subsidiaries

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)

ASU2016-04 – Liabilities—Extinguishments of Liabilities (Subtopic405-20): Recognition of Breakage for Certain Prepaid Stored-Value Products

In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU2016-04 which permits proportional derecognitiondoes not expect adoption of the liability for unused fundsamended guidance to have a material impact based on certain prepaid stored-value products (known as breakage)its preliminary analysis. However, the Bancorp is continuing to evaluate the impact of the amended guidance, particularly related to the extent that it is probable that a significant reversaldeferral of the recognized breakage amount will not subsequently occur.costs incurred in originating leases. The amendments do not applyBancorp also expects to any prepaid stored-value products that are attached to a segregated customer deposit account, or products for which unused funds are subject to unclaimed property remittance laws. The amended guidance may be applied retrospectively to all comparable periods presented in the year of adoption or applied on a modified retrospective basis by means ofrecord a cumulative-effect adjustment to retained earnings upon adoption to recognize any remaining deferred gains on sale-leaseback transactions that occurred prior to the date of initial application. The Bancorp had approximately $13 million of such deferred gains recorded as of June 30, 2018. These expectations may change as the beginning of the fiscal year of adoption. The Bancorp plans to adopt the amended guidance on its required effective date of January 1, 2018 and is currently in theimplementation process of evaluating the impact of the amended guidance on its Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements. However, the Bancorp’s preliminary analysis suggests that most of its prepaid stored-value products will not be affected by the amended guidance.continues.

ASU2016-13 – Financial Instruments—Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU2016-13 which establishes a new approach to estimate credit losses on certain types of financial instruments. The new approach changes the impairment model for most financial assets, and will require the use of an “expected credit loss” model for financial instruments measured at amortized cost and certain other instruments, includinginstruments. This model applies to trade and other receivables, loans, debt securities, net investments in leases, andoff-balance-sheet credit exposures (such as loan commitments, standby letters of credit, and financial guarantees not accounted for as insurance). This model requires entities to estimate the lifetime expected credit loss on such instruments and record an allowance that represents the portion of the amortized cost basis that the entity does not expect to collect. This allowance is deducted from the financial asset’s amortized cost basis to present the net amount expected to be collected. The new expected credit loss model will also apply to purchased financial assets with credit deterioration, superseding current accounting guidance for such assets. The amended guidance also amends the impairment model foravailable-for-sale debt securities, requiring entities to determine whether all or a portion of the unrealized loss on such securities is a credit loss, and also eliminating the option for management to consider the length of time a security has been in an unrealized loss position as a factor in concluding whether or not a credit loss exists. The amended model states that an entity will recognize an allowance for credit losses onavailable-for-sale debt securities as a contra account to the amortized cost basis, instead of a direct reduction of the amortized cost basis of the investment, as under current guidance. As a result, entities will recognize improvements to estimated credit losses onavailable-for-sale debt securities immediately in earnings as opposed to in interest income over time. There are also additional disclosure requirements included in this guidance. The amended guidance is effective for the Bancorp on January 1, 2020, with early2020. Early adoption is permitted as earlysoon as January 1, 2019.2019, but the Bancorp currently expects to adopt on the mandatory effective date. The amended guidance is to be applied on a modified retrospective basis with the cumulative effect of initially applying the amendments recognized in retained earnings at the date of initial application. However, certain provisions of the guidance are only required to be applied on a prospective basis. While the Bancorp is currently in the process of evaluating the impact of the amended guidance on its Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, it currently expects the ALLL to increase upon adoption given that the allowance will be required to cover the full remaining expected life of the portfolio upon adoption, rather than the incurred loss model under current U.S. GAAP. The extent of this increase is still being evaluated and will depend on economic conditions and the composition of the Bancorp’s loan and lease portfolio at the time of adoption.

ASU2016-15 – Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments

In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU2016-15 to clarify the classification of certain cash receipts and payments within an entity’s statement of cash flows. These items include debt prepayment or extinguishment costs, settlement ofzero-coupon debt instruments, contingent consideration payments made after a business combination, proceeds from the settlement of insurance claims, proceeds from the settlement of BOLI policies, distributions received from equity method investees, and beneficial interests in securitization transactions. The amended guidance also specifies how to address classification of cash receipts and payments that have aspects of more than one class of cash flows. The amended guidance is effective for the Bancorp on January 1, 2018, with early adoption permitted, and is to be applied on a retrospective basis unless it is impractical to do so. The Bancorp is currently in the process of evaluating the impact of the amended guidance on its Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, but does not currently expect the impact of adoption to be material based on the results of its preliminary analysis.

ASU2016-16 – Income Taxes (Topic 740): Intra-Entity Transfers of Assets Other Than Inventory

In October 2016, the FASB issued ASU2016-16 which requires an entity to recognize the income tax consequences of an intra-entity transfer of an asset other than inventory when the transfer occurs. Current U.S. GAAP prohibits the recognition of current and deferred income taxes for an intra-entity asset transfer until the asset has been sold to an outside party. The amended guidance is effective for the Bancorp on January 1, 2018, with early adoption permitted, and is applied on a modified retrospective basis through a cumulative-effect adjustment directly to retained earnings as of the beginning of the fiscal year in which the guidance is effective. The Bancorp is currently in the process of evaluating the impact of the amended guidance on its Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, but does not currently expect the impact of adoption to be material based on the results of its preliminary analysis.

ASU2017-01 – Business Combinations (Topic 805): Clarifying the Definition of a Business

In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU2017-01 which clarifies the definition of a business in order to assist entities with evaluating whether transactions should be accounted for as acquisitions (or disposals) of assets or businesses. The amended guidance provides a screen which states that when substantially all of the fair value of assets acquired (or disposed) is concentrated in a single asset or group of similar assets, then the set of assets and activities would not be considered a business. The amended guidance is effective for the Bancorp on January 1, 2018, and is to be applied prospectively. Upon adoption, the Bancorp will evaluate future transactions to determine if they should be accounted for as acquisitions (or disposals) of assets or businesses based on the amended guidance.

Fifth Third Bancorp and Subsidiaries

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)

 

 

ASU2017-04 – Intangibles—Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment

In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU2017-04 which simplifies the test for goodwill impairment by removing the second step, which measures the amount of impairment loss, if any. Instead, the amended guidance states that an entity should recognize an impairment charge for the amount by which the carrying amount exceeds the reporting unit’s fair value, except that the loss recognized should not exceed the total amount of goodwill allocated to that reporting unit. This would apply to all reporting units, including those with zero or negative carrying amounts of net assets. The amended guidance is effective for the Bancorp on January 1, 2020, with early adoption permitted, and is to be applied prospectively to all goodwill impairment tests performed after the adoption date.

ASU2017-05 – Other Income—Gains and Losses from the Derecognition of Nonfinancial Assets (Subtopic610-20): Clarifying the Scope of Asset Derecognition Guidance and Accounting for Partial Sales of Nonfinancial Assets

In February 2017, the FASB issued ASU2017-05 which clarifies the scope of Subtopic610-20 and defines the term “in substance nonfinancial asset.” The amendments require that an entity should initially identify each distinct nonfinancial asset or in substance nonfinancial asset promised to a counterparty and derecognize each asset when a counterparty obtains control of it. The amendments provide specific guidance on accounting for partial sales of nonfinancial assets, which require an entity to derecognize a distinct nonfinancial asset or in substance nonfinancial asset in a partial sale transaction when it 1) does not have (or ceases to have) a controlling financial interest in the legal entity that holds the asset and 2) transfers control of the asset. Once an entity transfers control of a distinct nonfinancial asset or distinct in substance nonfinancial asset, it is required to measure any noncontrolling interest it receives (or retains) at fair value. The amended guidance is effective for the Bancorp on January 1, 2018, concurrent with the adoption of ASU2014-09. It is to be applied using either a retrospective or modified retrospective approach, consistent with the transition method for ASU2014-09. The Bancorp is currently in the process of evaluating the impact of the amended guidance on its Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, but does not currently expect the impact of adoption to be material based on the results of its preliminary analysis.

ASU2017-08 Receivables—Nonrefundable Fees and Other Costs (Subtopic310-20): Premium Amortization on Purchased Callable Debt Securities

In March 2017, the FASB issued ASU2017-08 which shortens the amortization period for certain callable debt securities held at a premium. Specifically, the amendments require the premium to be amortized to the earliest call date. The amendments do not require an accounting change for securities held at a discount; the discount continues to be amortized to maturity. The amended guidance is effective for the Bancorp on January 1, 2019, with early adoption permitted, and is to be applied on a modified retrospective basis through a cumulative-effect adjustment directly to retained earnings as of the beginning of the period of adoption. The Bancorp shall provide a disclosure regarding the change in accounting principle. The Bancorp plans to adopt the amended guidance on its required effective date of January 1, 2019 and is currently in the process of evaluating the impact of the amended guidance on its Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

ASU2017-09 Compensation—Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Scope of Modification Accounting

In May 2017, the FASB issued ASU2017-09 which provides guidance about which changes to the terms or conditions of a share-based payment award require the application of modification accounting in Topic 718. The amendments specify that an entity should account for the effects of such changes as a modification unless the fair value, vesting conditions and classification (as an equity or liability) of the awards are all unaffected by the change. The amended guidance is effective for However, the Bancorp on January 1, 2018, and isdoes not currently expect the impact of adoption to be applied prospectively to awards modified on or after the adoption date, with early adoption permitted. Upon adoption, the Bancorp will evaluate future changes in award terms to determine if they should be accounted for as modifications based on the amended guidance.material.

Fifth Third Bancorp and Subsidiaries

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)

 

 

4. Investment Securities

The following tables provide the amortized cost, unrealized gains and losses and fair value for the major categories of theavailable-for-sale debt and other securities andheld-to-maturity investment securities portfolios as of:

 

June 30, 2017 ($ in millions)  

   Amortized

   Cost

  Unrealized
Gains
  Unrealized
Losses
 Fair  
    Value      

Available-for-sale and other securities:

       
June 30, 2018 ($ in millions)     Amortized
   Cost
  Unrealized
Gains
  Unrealized
Losses
 Fair
Value

Available-for-sale debt and other securities:

       

U.S. Treasury and federal agencies securities

  $69        -    -   69       $98        -    (2  96     

Obligations of states and political subdivisions securities

   43        2    -   45        34        1    -   35     

Mortgage-backed securities:

              

Agency residential mortgage-backed securities(a)

   16,009        223    (55  16,177        16,405        35    (346  16,094     

Agency commercial mortgage-backed securities

   9,165        135    (38  9,262        10,308        7    (277  10,038     

Non-agency commercial mortgage-backed securities

   3,315        55    (6  3,364        3,149        5    (68  3,086     

Asset-backed securities and other debt securities

   2,192        35    (21  2,206        1,981        26    (9  1,998     

Equity securities(b)

   699        2    (1  700     

Totalavailable-for-sale and other securities

  $        31,492        452    (121  31,823     

Other securities(a)

   614        -    -   614     

Totalavailable-for-sale debt and other securities

  $        32,589        74    (702  31,961     

Held-to-maturity securities:

              

Obligations of states and political subdivisions securities

  $24        -    -   24       $17        -    -   17     

Asset-backed securities and other debt securities

   2        -    -   2        2        -    -   2     

Totalheld-to-maturity securities

  $26        -    -   26       $19        -    -   19     
(a)

Includes interest-only mortgage-backed securities of$39as ofJune 30, 2017, recorded at fair value with fair value changes recorded in securities gains, net, in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income.

(b)

EquityOther securities consist of FHLB, FRB and DTCC restricted stock holdings of$248,$360364 and$2, respectively, atJune 30, 20172018, that are carried at cost, and certain mutual fund and equity security holdings.cost.

 

December 31, 2016 ($ in millions)     Amortized
   Cost
  Unrealized
Gains
  Unrealized
Losses
 Fair  
    Value      

Available-for-sale and other securities:

       
December 31, 2017 ($ in millions)     Amortized
   Cost
  Unrealized
Gains
  Unrealized
Losses
 Fair  
    Value      

Available-for-sale debt and other securities:

       

U.S. Treasury and federal agencies securities

  $547        2    -  549       $98        -    -  98     

Obligations of states and political subdivisions securities

   44        1    -  45        43        1    -  44     

Mortgage-backed securities:

              

Agency residential mortgage-backed securities(a)

   15,525        178    (95 15,608        15,281        118    (80 15,319     

Agency commercial mortgage-backed securities

   9,029        87    (61 9,055        10,113        92    (38 10,167     

Non-agency commercial mortgage-backed securities

   3,076        51    (15 3,112        3,247        51    (5 3,293     

Asset-backed securities and other debt securities

   2,106        28    (18 2,116        2,183        46    (11 2,218     

Equity securities(b)

   697        3    (2 698     

Totalavailable-for-sale and other securities

  $        31,024        350    (191 31,183     

Other securities(b)

   612        -    -  612     

Totalavailable-for-sale debt and other securities

  $        31,577        308    (134 31,751     

Held-to-maturity securities:

              

Obligations of states and political subdivisions securities

  $24        -    -  24       $22        -    -  22     

Asset-backed securities and other debt securities

   2        -    -  2        2        -    -  2     

Totalheld-to-maturity securities

  $26        -    -  26       $24        -    -  24     
(a)

Includes interest-only mortgage-backed securities of $60$34 as of December 31, 2016,2017, recorded at fair value with fair value changes recorded in securities gains, net, in the Consolidated Statements of Income.

(b)

Other securities consist of FHLB, FRB and DTCC restricted stock holdings of $248, $362 and $2, respectively, at December 31, 2017, that are carried at cost.

The following table provides the fair value of trading debt securities and equity securities as of:

 

($ in millions)     

June 30,

      2018  

   December 31,      
2017    

 

Trading debt securities

  $                  280   492        

Equity securities

      475   439        

 

Fifth Third Bancorp and Subsidiaries

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)

The following table presents net realized gains and losses that were recognized in income fromavailable-for-sale debt and other securities as well as total (losses) gains that were recognized in income from trading debt securities and equity securities:

      For the three months ended    
June 30,
 

For the six months ended    

June 30,

($ in millions)    2018 2017 2018 2017

Available-for-sale debt and other securities:

     

  Realized gains

 $ 22      21     56    30   

  Realized losses

  (22)     (7)    (65)   (8)  

  OTTI(a)

   -      (14)    -    (24)  

Net realized losses onavailable-for sale debt and other securities(b)

 $ -      -     (9)   (2)  

Total trading debt securities (losses) gains(c)

 $ (4)     2     (18)   3   

Total equity securities (losses) gains(d)(e)

 $ (5)     2     (8)   3   

Total (losses) and gains recognized in income fromavailable-for-sale debt and other

  securities, trading debt securities and equity securities

 $ (9)     4     (35)   4   
(a)

Included in securities (losses) gains, net in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income.

(b)

Equity securities consist of FHLB, FRB and DTCC restricted stock holdings of $248, $358 and $1, respectively, at December 31, 2016, that are carried at cost, and certain mutual fund and equity security holdings.

The following table presents realized gains and losses that were recognized in income fromavailable-for-sale securities:

      For the three months ended
June 30,
  For the six months ended    
June 30,
 
($ in millions)    2017  2016   2017  2016       

Realized gains

 $  21        15        30    29            

Realized losses

   (7)       (4)       (8)   (8)           

OTTI

   (14)       (3)       (24)   (5)           

Net realized (losses) gains(a)

 $  -        8        (2)   16            
(a)

Excludes net lossesgains on interest-only mortgage-backed securities of$20 and$1 for the three and six months endedJune 30, 20172018, respectively, and $3net losses of $2 and $8$1 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2016,2017, respectively.

The following table provides a summary of OTTI by security type:

      For the three months ended
June 30,
  For the six months ended     
June 30,
 
($ in millions)    2017  2016   2017  2016       

Available-for-sale and other debt securities

 

$

  (14)       (3)       (24)   (4)           

Available-for-sale equity securities

   -        -        -   (1)           

Total OTTI(a)

 

$

  (14)       (3)       (24)   (5)           
(a)

Included in securities gains, net in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income.

Fifth Third Bancorp and Subsidiaries

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)

Trading securities were $842 million as of June 30, 2017 compared to $410 million at December 31, 2016. The following table presents total gains and losses that were recognized in income from trading securities:

      For the three months ended
June 30,
  For the six months ended
June 30,
 
($ in millions)      2017        2016          2017            2016         

Realized gains(a)

 $  2      4         5        

Realized losses(b)

   (2)     (2)     (4)   (6)       

Net unrealized gains(c)

    4      1         1        

Total trading securities gains

 $  4      3         -        
(a)(c)

Includes realized gainsan immaterial net loss and a net loss of$2and$4for the three and six months endedJune 30, 20172018, respectively, and $4 and $5immaterial net gains for both the three and six months ended June 30, 2016,2017, respectively, recorded in corporate banking revenue and wealth and asset management revenue in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income.

(b)(d)

Includes realized losses of$2and$4immaterial net gains for both the three and six months endedJune 30, 20172018, respectively, and $2 and $6 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2016, respectively,2017 recorded in corporate banking revenue and wealth and asset management revenue in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income.

(c)(e)

Includes an immaterial amount of net unrealized losses duringof$5 and$6 for the three and six months endedJune 30, 20172018, respectively, and an immaterial amount of net unrealized gains during the six months ended June 30, 2017of $2 and both$3 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2016, recorded in corporate banking revenue and wealth and asset management revenue in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income.2017, respectively.

At June 30, 20172018 and December 31, 2016,2017, investment securities with a fair value of $7.8$6.8 billion and $10.1$7.8 billion, respectively, were pledged to secure borrowings, public deposits, trust funds, derivative contracts and for other purposes as required or permitted by law.

The expected maturity distribution of the Bancorp’s mortgage-backed securities and the contractual maturity distribution of the remainder of the Bancorp’savailable-for-sale debt and other securities andheld-to-maturity investment securities as of June 30, 20172018 are shown in the following table:

 

    Available-for-Sale Debt and Other Held-to-Maturity
    Available-for-Sale and Other Held-to-Maturity  

 

 

 

($ in millions)      Amortized Cost   Fair Value Amortized Cost Fair Value        Amortized Cost Fair Value   Amortized Cost Fair Value    

Debt securities:(a)

          

Less than 1 year

 $ 144  146  6      6     $214        207  1  1   

1-5 years

  7,205  7,276  9      9     8,923        8,800  16  16   

5-10 years

  20,787  21,023  9      9     18,047        17,669      -    

Over 10 years

  2,657  2,678  2      2     4,791        4,671  2  2   

Equity securities

   699  700   -       -   

Other securities

 614        614      -    

Total

 $ 31,492      31,823  26      26    $    32,589        31,961  19  19   
(a)

Actual maturities may differ from contractual maturities when a right to call or prepay obligations exists with or without call or prepayment penalties.

The following table provides the fair value and gross unrealized losses onavailable-for-sale debt and other securities in an unrealized loss position, aggregated by investment category and length of time the individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position as of:

 

    Less than 12 months 12 months or more Total    Less than 12 months  12 months or more  Total
($ in millions)    Fair Value     Unrealized    
Losses
 Fair Value     Unrealized    
Losses
 Fair Value     Unrealized    
Losses
    Fair Value     Unrealized    
Losses
  Fair Value     Unrealized    
Losses
  Fair Value     Unrealized    
Losses

June 30, 2017

   

Agency residential mortgage-backed securities

 $  5,047   (48)     152     (7)     5,199   (55)     

Agency commercial mortgage-backed securities

   2,263   (38  -   -   2,263   (38)     

Non-agency commercial mortgage-backed securities

   710   (6  -   -   710   (6)     

Asset-backed securities and other debt securities

   327   (5  373   (16  700   (21)     

Equity securities

    -   -   37   (1  37   (1)     

Total

 $  8,347   (97  562   (24  8,909   (121)     

December 31, 2016

   

June 30, 2018

         

U.S. Treasury and federal agencies

 $ 199   -   -   -  199   -        $   96     (2)     -     -        96     (2) 

Agency residential mortgage-backed securities

  6,223  (88 172  (7 6,395  (95)        12,456     (313)     478     (33)       12,934     (346) 

Agency commercial mortgage-backed securities

  3,183  (61  -   -  3,183  (61)        8,719     (247)     547     (30)       9,266     (277) 

Non-agency commercial mortgage-backed securities

  1,052  (15  -   -  1,052  (15)        2,540     (59)     140     (9)       2,680     (68) 

Asset-backed securities and other debt securities

  422  (8 336  (10 758  (18)       284     (2)     395     (7)       679     (9) 

Equity securities

    -   -  37  (2 37  (2)     

Total

 $ 11,079  (172 545  (19 11,624  (191)       $   24,095     (623)     1,560     (79)       25,655     (702) 

December 31, 2017

       

U.S. Treasury and federal agencies

  $  98          -     -       98      

Agency residential mortgage-backed securities

  7,337    (59)    479    (21)      7,816    (80) 

Agency commercial mortgage-backed securities

  2,900    (22)    526    (16)      3,426    (38) 

Non-agency commercial mortgage-backed securities

  449    (2)    145    (3)      594    (5) 

Asset-backed securities and other debt securities

 317    (2)    386    (9)      703    (11) 

Total

  $  11,101    (85)    1,536    (49)      12,637    (134) 

At both June 30, 20172018 and December 31, 2016,2017, an immaterial amount of unrealized losses in theavailable-for-sale debt and other securities portfolio were represented bynon-rated securities.

Fifth Third Bancorp and Subsidiaries

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)

 

 

5. Loans and Leases

The Bancorp diversifies its loan and lease portfolio by offering a variety of loan and lease products with various payment terms and rate structures. Lending activities are generally concentrated within those states in which the Bancorp has banking centers and are primarily located in the Midwestern and Southeastern regions of the U.S. The Bancorp’s commercial loan and lease portfolio consists of lending to various industry types. Management periodically reviews the performance of its loan and lease products to evaluate whether they are performing within acceptable interest rate and credit risk levels and changes are made to underwriting policies and procedures as needed. The Bancorp maintains an allowance to absorb loan and lease losses inherent in the portfolio. For further information on credit quality and the ALLL, refer to Note 6.

The following table provides a summary of commercial loans and leases classified by primary purpose and consumer loans and leases classified based upon product or collateral as of:

 

($ in millions)          June 30,
        2017  
    December 31,    
2016    
          June 30,
           2018  
    December 31,    
2017    

Loans held for sale:

    

Loans and leases held for sale:

    

Commercial and industrial loans

  $9     60           $44          -         

Commercial mortgage loans

   8     5            72         6         

Commercial leases

   9          -         

Residential mortgage loans

   749     686            658         486         

Total loans held for sale

  $766    751         

Total loans and leases held for sale

  $783        492         

Portfolio loans and leases:

        

Commercial and industrial loans

  $            40,914     41,676           $            41,403         41,170         

Commercial mortgage loans

   6,868     6,899            6,625         6,604         

Commercial construction loans

   4,366     3,903            4,687         4,553         

Commercial leases

   4,157    3,974            3,788        4,068         

Total commercial loans and leases

  $56,305    56,452    ��      $56,503        56,395         

Residential mortgage loans

  $15,460     15,051           $15,640         15,591         

Home equity

   7,301     7,695            6,599         7,014         

Automobile loans

   9,318     9,983            8,938         9,112         

Credit card

   2,117     2,237            2,270         2,299         

Other consumer loans and leases

   945    680         

Total consumer loans and leases

  $35,141    35,646         

Other consumer loans

   1,982        1,559         

Total consumer loans

  $35,429        35,575         

Total portfolio loans and leases

  $91,446    92,098           $91,932        91,970         

Total portfolio loans and leases are recorded net of unearned income, which totaled $497$496 million as of June 30, 20172018 and $503$523 million as of December 31, 2016.2017. Additionally, portfolio loans and leases are recorded net of unamortized premiums and discounts, deferred direct loan origination fees and costs and fair value adjustments (associated with acquired loans or loans designated as fair value upon origination) which totaled a net premium of $267$286 million and $240$282 million as of June 30, 20172018 and December 31, 2016,2017, respectively.

The Bancorp’s FHLB and FRB advances are generally secured by loans. The Bancorp had loans of $13.5$13.3 billion and $13.1$13.0 billion at June 30, 20172018 and December 31, 2016,2017, respectively, pledged at the FHLB, and loans of $39.9$40.4 billion and $40.0$39.8 billion at June 30, 20172018 and December 31, 2016,2017, respectively, pledged at the FRB.

Fifth Third Bancorp and Subsidiaries

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)

 

 

The following table presents a summary of the total loans and leases owned by the Bancorp as of:

 

    Carrying Value  

    90 Days Past Due

    and Still Accruing

    Carrying Value    

    90 Days Past Due

    and Still Accruing

  

 

 

 

($ in millions)    

     June 30,    

     2017    

  December 31,
  2016
                  June 30,
                   2017
         December 31,
                2016
       

June 30,

2018

  December 31,
2017 
                  June 30,
                 2018
       December 31,    
     2017

Commercial and industrial loans

 $  40,923          41,736               3          4    $41,447           41,170         3        

Commercial mortgage loans

   6,876          6,904      -   -     6,697           6,610          -        

Commercial construction loans

   4,366          3,903      -   -     4,687           4,553          -        

Commercial leases

   4,157          3,974      -   -     3,797           4,068          -        

Residential mortgage loans

   16,209          15,737      45  49     16,298           16,077       44   57        

Home equity

   7,301          7,695      -   -     6,599           7,014          -        

Automobile loans

   9,318          9,983      7  9     8,938           9,112       10   10        

Credit card

   2,117          2,237      20  22     2,270           2,299       31   27        

Other consumer loans and leases

    945          680      -   -  

Other consumer loans

    1,982           1,559          -        

Total loans and leases

 $  92,212          92,849      75  84     $92,715           92,462       89   97        

Less: Loans held for sale

    766          751      

Less: Loans and leases held for sale

   

 

783       

 

   492       

Total portfolio loans and leases

 $          91,446          92,098         $        91,932           91,970       

The following table presents a summary of net charge-offs (recoveries):

 

    

The following table presents a summary of net charge-offs:

The following table presents a summary of net charge-offs:

 

   
               For the three months ended
       June 30,
  

        For the six months ended

      June 30,

       For the three months ended
June 30,
  

        For the six months ended

      June 30,

($ in millions)    2017            2016          2017            2016              2018              2017             2018           2017          

Commercial and industrial loans

 

$

  18         39    52      86    $47           18       74      52        

Commercial mortgage loans

   5         6    11      13     2           5       2      11        

Commercial construction loans

   -         -    -      (1    -           -       -       -        

Commercial leases

   1         1    2      3     -           1       -      2        

Residential mortgage loans

   2         2    7      5     2           2       4      7        

Home equity

   5         6    11      13     2           5       7      11        

Automobile loans

   6         8    18      16     8           6       19      18        

Credit card

   22         21    43      41     26           22       52      43        

Other consumer loans and leases

    5         4    9      7  

Other consumer loans

    7           5       17      9        

Total net charge-offs

 

$

              64         87            153      183     $94           64               175      153        

Fifth Third Bancorp and Subsidiaries

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)

 

 

6. Credit Quality and the Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses

The Bancorp disaggregates ALLL balances and transactions in the ALLL by portfolio segment. Credit quality related disclosures for loans and leases are further disaggregated by class.

Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses

The following tables summarize transactions in the ALLL by portfolio segment:

 

For the three months ended June 30, 2018 ($ in millions)       Commercial       Residential
      Mortgage
     Consumer     Unallocated     Total      

Balance, beginning of period

 $713      89    222   114   1,138      

Lossescharged-off(a)

  (54)     (4)   (60  -   (118)     

Recoveries of losses previouslycharged-off(a)

  5         17   -   24      

Provision for (benefit from) loan and lease losses

  (10)     (1)   50   (6  33      

Balance, end of period

 $654      86    229   108   1,077      

(a) For the three months ended June 30, 2018, the Bancorp recorded$6 in both lossescharged-off and recoveries of lossescharged-off related to customer defaults onpoint-of-sale consumer loans for which the Bancorp obtained recoveries under third-party credit enhancements.

(a) For the three months ended June 30, 2018, the Bancorp recorded$6 in both lossescharged-off and recoveries of lossescharged-off related to customer defaults onpoint-of-sale consumer loans for which the Bancorp obtained recoveries under third-party credit enhancements.

 

For the three months ended June 30, 2017 ($ in millions)       Commercial       Residential
      Mortgage
     Consumer     Unallocated     Total               Commercial       Residential
      Mortgage
     Consumer     Unallocated     Total      

Balance, beginning of period

 $826   96   204   112   1,238  $826     96   204  112  1,238      

Lossescharged-off

  (41  (4  (50  -   (95 (41)    (4)  (50  -  (95)     

Recoveries of losses previouslycharged-off

  17   2   12   -   31  17       12   -  31      

Provision for (benefit from) loan and lease losses

  15   (1  40   (2  52  15     (1)  40  (2 52      

Balance, end of period

 $817   93   206   110   1,226  $817     93   206  110  1,226      
      
For the three months ended June 30, 2016 ($ in millions)       Commercial       Residential
      Mortgage
     Consumer     Unallocated     Total        
For the six months ended June 30, 2018 ($ in millions)       Commercial       Residential
      Mortgage
     Consumer     Unallocated     Total      

Balance, beginning of period

 $867  98  214  116  1,295  $753      89    234   120   1,196      

Lossescharged-off

 (51 (5 (49  -  (105

Recoveries of losses previouslycharged-off

 5  3  10   -  18 

Provision for loan and lease losses

 52  2  36  1  91 

Lossescharged-off(a)

  (87)     (7)   (128  -   (222)     

Recoveries of losses previouslycharged-off(a)

  11         33   -   47      

Provision for (benefit from) loan and lease losses

  (23)        90   (12  56      

Balance, end of period

 $873  98  211  117  1,299  $654      86    229   108   1,077      
     

(a) For the six months endedJune 30, 2018, the Bancorp recorded$10 in both lossescharged-off and recoveries of lossescharged-off related to customer defaults onpoint-of-sale consumer loans for which the Bancorp obtained recoveries under third-party credit enhancements.

(a) For the six months endedJune 30, 2018, the Bancorp recorded$10 in both lossescharged-off and recoveries of lossescharged-off related to customer defaults onpoint-of-sale consumer loans for which the Bancorp obtained recoveries under third-party credit enhancements.

 

For the six months ended June 30, 2017 ($ in millions)       Commercial       Residential
      Mortgage
     Consumer     Unallocated     Total               Commercial       Residential
      Mortgage
     Consumer     Unallocated     Total      

Balance, beginning of period

 $831   96   214   112   1,253  $831     96   214  112  1,253      

Lossescharged-off

  (86  (10  (106  -   (202 (86)    (10)  (106  -  (202)     

Recoveries of losses previouslycharged-off

  21   3   25   -   49  21       25   -  49      

Provision for (benefit from) loan and lease losses

  51   4   73   (2  126  51       73  (2 126      

Balance, end of period

 $817   93   206   110   1,226  $817     93   206  110  1,226      

The following tables provide a summary of the ALLL and related loans and leases classified by portfolio segment:

The following tables provide a summary of the ALLL and related loans and leases classified by portfolio segment:

 

     
For the six months ended June 30, 2016 ($ in millions)       Commercial       Residential
      Mortgage
     Consumer     Unallocated     Total        

Balance, beginning of period

 $840  100  217  115  1,272 

Lossescharged-off

 (112 (10 (100  -  (222

Recoveries of losses previouslycharged-off

 11  5  23   -  39 

Provision for loan and lease losses

 134  3  71  2  210 

Balance, end of period

 $873  98  211  117  1,299         

The following tables provide a summary of the ALLL and related loans and leases classified by portfolio segment:

 

As of June 30, 2017 ($ in millions)       Commercial   Residential
  Mortgage
  Consumer Unallocated Total    
As of June 30, 2018 ($ in millions)       Commercial       Residential
      Mortgage
     Consumer     Unallocated     Total     

ALLL:(a)

          

Individually evaluated for impairment

 $118 (c)   66   40   -   224  $75   65    38   -   178      

Collectively evaluated for impairment

  699   27   166   -   892   579   21    191   -   791      

Unallocated

  -   -   -   110   110   -      -   108   108      

Total ALLL

 $817   93   206   110   1,226  $654   86    229   108   1,077      

Portfolio loans and leases:(b)

          

Individually evaluated for impairment

 $760 (c)   652   339   -   1,751  $400   788    297   -   1,485      

Collectively evaluated for impairment

  55,545   14,664   19,342   -   89,551   56,103   14,690    19,492   -   90,285      

Loans acquired with deteriorated credit quality

  -   2   -   -   2 

Total portfolio loans and leases

 $      56,305   15,318   19,681   -   91,304          $      56,503   15,478    19,789   -   91,770      
(a)

Includes$21 related to leveraged leases atJune 30, 20172018.

(b)

Excludes$142162of residential mortgage loans measured at fair value and includes$706650 of leveraged leases, net of unearned income atJune 30, 20172018.

(c)

Includes five restructured loans atJune 30, 2017 associated with a consolidated VIE in which the Bancorp has no continuing credit risk due to the risk being assumed by a third party, with a recorded investment of$26 and an ALLL of$18.

Fifth Third Bancorp and Subsidiaries

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)

 

 

As of December 31, 2016 ($ in millions)       Commercial   Residential
  Mortgage
  Consumer  Unallocated  Total    
As of December 31, 2017 ($ in millions)       Commercial   Residential
  Mortgage
  Consumer   Unallocated   Total     

ALLL:(a)

              

Individually evaluated for impairment

 $118(c)  68  44    -    230      $94      64      42        -         200       

Collectively evaluated for impairment

 713  28  170    -    911      659      25      192        -         876       

Unallocated

  -   -   -    112    112       -       -       -        120         120       

Total ALLL

 $831  96  214    112    1,253      $753      89      234        120         1,196       

Portfolio loans and leases:(b)

              

Individually evaluated for impairment

 $904(c)  652  371    -    1,927      $560      665      320        -         1,545       

Collectively evaluated for impairment

 55,548  14,253  20,224    -    90,025      55,835      14,787      19,664        -         90,286       

Loans acquired with deteriorated credit quality

  -  3   -    -    3       -      2       -        -         2       

Total portfolio loans and leases

 $      56,452  14,908  20,595    -    91,955      $56,395      15,454      19,984        -         91,833       
(a)

Includes $2$1 related to leveraged leases at December 31, 2016.2017.

(b)

Excludes $143$137 of residential mortgage loans measured at fair value and includes $701$674 of leveraged leases, net of unearned income at December 31, 2016.

(c)

Includes five restructured loans at December 31, 2016 associated with a consolidated VIE in which the Bancorp has no continuing credit risk due to the risk being assumed by a third party, with a recorded investment of $26 and an ALLL of $18.2017.

CREDIT RISK PROFILE

Commercial Portfolio Segment

For purposes of analyzing historical loss rates used in the determination of the ALLL and monitoring the credit quality and risk characteristics of its commercial portfolio segment, the Bancorp disaggregates the segment into the following classes: commercial and industrial, commercial mortgage owner-occupied, commercial mortgage nonowner-occupied, commercial construction and commercial leases.

To facilitate the monitoring of credit quality within the commercial portfolio segment, and for purposes of analyzing historical loss rates used in the determination of the ALLL for the commercial portfolio segment, the Bancorp utilizes the following categories of credit grades: pass, special mention, substandard, doubtful and loss. The five categories, which are derived from standard regulatory rating definitions, are assigned upon initial approval of credit to borrowers and updated periodically thereafter.

Pass ratings, which are assigned to those borrowers that do not have identified potential or well definedwell-defined weaknesses and for which there is a high likelihood of orderly repayment, are updated at least annually based on the size and credit characteristics of the borrower. All other categories are updated on a quarterly basis during the month preceding the end of the calendar quarter.

The Bancorp assigns a special mention rating to loans and leases that have potential weaknesses that deserve management’s close attention. If left uncorrected, these potential weaknesses may, at some future date, result in the deterioration of the repayment prospects for the loan or lease or the Bancorp’s credit position.

The Bancorp assigns a substandard rating to loans and leases that are inadequately protected by the current sound worth and paying capacity of the borrower or of the collateral pledged. Substandard loans and leases have well definedwell-defined weaknesses or weaknesses that could jeopardize the orderly repayment of the debt. Loans and leases in this grade also are characterized by the distinct possibility that the Bancorp will sustain some loss if the deficiencies noted are not addressed and corrected.

The Bancorp assigns a doubtful rating to loans and leases that have all the attributes of a substandard rating with the added characteristic that the weaknesses make collection or liquidation in full, on the basis of currently existing facts, conditions and values, highly questionable and improbable. The possibility of loss is extremely high, but because of certain important and reasonable specific pending factors that may work to the advantage of and strengthen the credit quality of the loan or lease, its classification as an estimated loss is deferred until its more exact status may be determined. Pending factors may include a proposed merger or acquisition, liquidation proceeding, capital injection, perfecting liens on additional collateral or refinancing plans.

Loans and leases classified as loss are considered uncollectible and arecharged-off in the period in which they are determined to be uncollectible. Because loans and leases in this category are fullycharged-off, they are not included in the following tables.

The following tables summarize the credit risk profile of the Bancorp’s commercial portfolio segment, by class:

 

As of June 30, 2017 ($ in millions)        Pass       Special
    Mention
   Substandard   Doubtful     Total          
As of June 30, 2018 ($ in millions)       Pass      Special
    Mention
  Substandard  Doubtful    Total         

Commercial and industrial loans

  $38,281      1,151      1,460        22        40,914        $39,601      899      885        18        41,403       

Commercial mortgage owner-occupied loans

   3,207      76      102        -        3,385         3,217      40      134        -        3,391       

Commercial mortgage nonowner-occupied loans

   3,358      31      94        -        3,483         3,200      21      13        -        3,234       

Commercial construction loans

   4,320      46      -        -        4,366         4,652      35      -        -        4,687       

Commercial leases

   4,041      85      31        -        4,157         3,649      54      85        -        3,788       

Total commercial loans and leases

  $        53,207      1,389      1,687        22        56,305        $        54,319      1,049      1,117        18        56,503       

Fifth Third Bancorp and Subsidiaries

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)

 

 

As of December 31, 2016 ($ in millions)        Pass       Special
    Mention
   Substandard   Doubtful     Total          
As of December 31, 2017 ($ in millions)        Pass       Special
    Mention
   Substandard   Doubtful     Total          

Commercial and industrial loans

  $38,844      1,204      1,604        24        41,676         $38,813      1,115      1,235          7          41,170       

Commercial mortgage owner-occupied loans

   3,168      72      117        3        3,360          3,207      75      80          -          3,362       

Commercial mortgage nonowner-occupied loans

   3,466      4      69        -        3,539          3,117      28      97          -          3,242       

Commercial construction loans

   3,902      1      -        -        3,903          4,553      -      -          -          4,553       

Commercial leases

   3,894      54      26        -        3,974          3,922      72      74          -          4,068       

Total commercial loans and leases

  $        53,274      1,335      1,816        27        56,452         $        53,612      1,290      1,486          7          56,395       

Residential Mortgage and Consumer Portfolio Segments

For purposes of monitoring the credit quality and risk characteristics of its consumer portfolio segment, the Bancorp disaggregates the segment into the following classes: home equity, automobile loans, credit card and other consumer loans and leases.loans. The Bancorp’s residential mortgage portfolio segment is also a separate class.

The Bancorp considers repayment performance as the best indicator of credit quality for residential mortgage and consumer loans, which includes both the delinquency status and performing versus nonperforming status of the loans. The delinquency status of all residential mortgage and consumer loans is presented by class in the age analysis section while the performing versus nonperforming status is presented in the following table. Refer to the nonaccrual loans and leases section of Note 1 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in the Bancorp’s Annual Report on Form10-K for the year ended December 31, 20162017 for additional delinquency and nonperforming information.

The following table presents a summary of the Bancorp’s residential mortgage and consumer portfolio segments, by class, disaggregated into performing versus nonperforming status as of:

 

     June 30, 2017   December 31, 2016      June 30, 2018   December 31, 2017 
($ in millions)       Performing       Nonperforming       Performing           Nonperforming         Performing       Nonperforming       Performing           Nonperforming  

Residential mortgage loans(a)

 $   15,286      32      14,874       34  $   15,450      28        15,424       30    

Home equity

    7,231      70      7,622       73     6,528      71        6,940       74    

Automobile loans

    9,317      1      9,981       2     8,933      5        9,111       1    

Credit card

    2,091      26      2,209       28     2,243      27        2,273       26    

Other consumer loans and leases

     945      -      680       - 

Total residential mortgage and consumer loans and leases(a)

 $   34,870      129      35,366       137 

Other consumer loans

     1,981      1        1,559       -    

Total residential mortgage and consumer loans

 $   35,135      132        35,307       131    
(a)

Excludes$142162and $143$137 of residential mortgage loans measured at fair value atJune 30, 20172018 and December 31, 2016,2017, respectively.

Age Analysis of Past Due Loans and Leases

The following tables summarize the Bancorp’s recorded investment in portfolio loans and leases, by age and class:

 

  Current  Past Due      90 Days Past   Current  Past Due      90 Days Past    
As of June 30, 2017 ($ in millions)  Loans and
Leases(c)
  30-89
Days(c)
  90 Days
or More(c)
  Total
Past Due
   Total Loans
and Leases
  Due and Still
Accruing
 
As of June 30, 2018 ($ in millions)  Loans and
Leases(b)(c)
  30-89
Days(c)
  90 Days
or More(c)
  Total
Past Due
  Total Loans
and Leases
  Due and Still    
Accruing    

Commercial loans and leases:

                              

Commercial and industrial loans

  $40,761     48    105    153        40,914      3            $41,281     19    103    122        41,403      4        

Commercial mortgage owner-occupied loans

   3,366     4    15    19        3,385      -             3,384     1    6    7        3,391      -        

Commercial mortgage nonowner-occupied loans

   3,468     9    6    15        3,483      -             3,228     3    3    6        3,234      -        

Commercial construction loans

   4,366     -    -    -        4,366      -             4,687     -    -    -        4,687      -        

Commercial leases

   4,154     -    3    3        4,157      -             3,784     -    4    4        3,788      -        

Residential mortgage loans(b)(a)

   15,213     27    78    105        15,318      45             15,382     24    72    96        15,478      44        

Consumer loans and leases:

            

Consumer loans:

                  

Home equity

   7,183     66    52    118        7,301      -             6,482     66    51    117        6,599      -        

Automobile loans

   9,245     64    9    73        9,318      7             8,840     84    14    98        8,938      10        

Credit card

   2,065     28    24    52        2,117      20             2,198     36    36    72        2,270      31        

Other consumer loans and leases

   943     2    -    2        945      -         

Other consumer loans

    1,972     8    2    10        1,982      -        

Total portfolio loans and leases(a)

  $        90,764     248    292    540        91,304      75            $        91,238     241    291    532        91,770      89        
(a)

Excludes$142162 of residential mortgage loans measured at fair value atJune 30, 20172018.

(b)

Information includes advances made pursuant to servicing agreements for GNMA mortgage pools whose repayments are insured by the FHA or guaranteed by the VA. These advances were$280 asAs ofJune 30, 20172018, of which$7971of these loans were30-89 days past due and$179237 were 90 days or more past due. The Bancorp recognized$1and $3of lossesduring the three and six months endedJune 30, 20172018, respectively, due to claim denials and curtailments associated with these insured or guaranteed loans.

(c)

Includes accrual and nonaccrual loans and leases.

Fifth Third Bancorp and Subsidiaries

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)

 

 

  Current     Past Due              90 Days Past       Current     Past Due             90 Days Past     
As of December 31, 2016 ($ in millions)  

Loans and

Leases(c)

   

30-89

Days(c)

   

90 Days

or More(c)

   

Total

Past Due

   

Total Loans

and Leases

  

Due and Still

Accruing

 
As of December 31, 2017 ($ in millions)  Loans and
Leases(b)(c)
   30-89
Days(c)
   90 Days
or More(c)
   Total
Past Due
   Total Loans
and Leases
  Due and Still
Accruing
 

Commercial loans and leases:

                        

Commercial and industrial loans

  $41,495    87      94        181         41,676          4                $41,027    42      101        143         41,170          3              

Commercial mortgage owner-occupied loans

   3,332    6      22        28         3,360          -                 3,351    3      8        11         3,362          -              

Commercial mortgage nonowner-occupied loans

   3,530    2      7        9         3,539          -                 3,235    -      7        7         3,242          -              

Commercial construction loans

   3,902    1      -        1         3,903          -                 4,552    1      -        1         4,553          -              

Commercial leases

   3,972    -      2        2         3,974          -                 4,065    3      -        3         4,068          -              

Residential mortgage loans(b)(a)

   14,790    37      81        118        14,908          49                 15,301    66      87        153         15,454          57              

Consumer loans and leases:

            

Consumer loans:

            

Home equity

   7,570    68      57        125         7,695          -                 6,888    70      56        126         7,014          -              

Automobile loans

   9,886    85      12        97         9,983          9                 8,992    107      13        120         9,112          10              

Credit card

   2,183    28      26        54         2,237          22                 2,230    36      33        69         2,299          27              

Other consumer loans and leases

   679    1      -        1         680          -              

Other consumer loans

   1,554    5      -        5         1,559          -              

Total portfolio loans and leases(a)

  $      91,339    315      301        616         91,955          84                $      91,195    333      305        638         91,833          97              
(a)

Excludes $143$137 of residential mortgage loans measured at fair value at December 31, 2016.2017.

(b)

Information includes advances made pursuant to servicing agreements for GNMA mortgage pools whose repayments are insured by the FHA or guaranteed by the VA. These advances were $312 asAs of December 31, 2016, of which $1102017, $95 of these loans were30-89 days past due and $202$290 were 90 days or more past due. The Bancorp recognized $1 and $3 of losses during the three and six months ended June 30, 2016,2017, respectively, due to claim denials and curtailments associated with these insured or guaranteed loans.

(c)

Includes accrual and nonaccrual loans and leases.

Impaired Portfolio Loans and Leases

Larger commercial loans and leases included within aggregate borrower relationship balances exceeding $1 million that exhibit probable or observed credit weaknesses are subject to individual review for impairment. The Bancorp also performs an individual review on loans and leases that are restructured in a TDR. The Bancorp considers the current value of collateral, credit quality of any guarantees, the loan structure and other factors when evaluating whether an individual loan or lease is impaired. Other factors may include the geography and industry of the borrower, size and financial condition of the borrower, cash flow and leverage of the borrower and the Bancorp’s evaluation of the borrower’s management. Smaller-balance homogenous loans or leases that are collectively evaluated for impairment are not included in the following tables.

The following tables summarize the Bancorp’s impaired portfolio loans and leases, by class, that were subject to individual review, which includes all portfolio loans and leases restructured in a TDR:

 

As of June 30, 2017 ($ in millions)  Unpaid
Principal
Balance
     Recorded
  Investment
 ALLL       
As of June 30, 2018 ($ in millions)  Unpaid
Principal
Balance
  Recorded
Investment
          ALLL        

With a related ALLL:

              

Commercial loans and leases:

     

Commercial and industrial loans

  $450            394     90       

Commercial mortgage owner-occupied loans(b)

   21            15     9       

Commercial mortgage nonowner-occupied loans

   4            3     1       

Restructured residential mortgage loans

   462            459     66       

Restructured consumer loans and leases:

     

Home equity

   188            187     27       

Automobile loans

   9            9     1       

Credit card

   47            47     12       

Total impaired portfolio loans and leases with a related ALLL

  $1,181            1,114     206       

With no related ALLL:

     

Commercial loans and leases:

              

Commercial and industrial loans

  $276            255     -          $248            204      63      

Commercial mortgage owner-occupied loans

   30            25     -           4            3      1      

Commercial mortgage nonowner-occupied loans

   39            39     -           2            1      -      

Commercial leases

   3            3     -           29            29      11      

Restructured residential mortgage loans

   213            193     -           497            494      65      

Restructured consumer loans and leases:

     

Restructured consumer loans:

         

Home equity

   97            94     -           158            157      22      

Automobile loans

   2            2     -           6            6      1      

Total impaired portfolio loans and leases with no related ALLL

  $660            611     -       

Credit card

    48            45      15      

Total impaired portfolio loans and leases with a related ALLL

   $992            939      178      

With no related ALLL:

         

Commercial loans:

         

Commercial and industrial loans

   $147            124      -      

Commercial mortgage owner-occupied loans

    15            12      -      

Commercial mortgage nonowner-occupied loans

    28            27      -      

Restructured residential mortgage loans

    314            294      -      

Restructured consumer loans:

         

Home equity

    90            87      -      

Automobile loans

    3            2      -      

Total impaired portfolio loans with no related ALLL

   $597            546      -      

Total impaired portfolio loans and leases

  $        1,841            1,725  (a)   206          $        1,589            1,485  (a)     178      
(a)

Includes$224104,$639773 and$294251, respectively, of commercial, residential mortgage and consumer portfolio TDRs on accrual status and$244173,$1315 and$4546, respectively, of commercial, residential mortgage and consumer portfolio TDRs on nonaccrual status atJune 30, 20172018.

(b)

Excludes five restructured loans atJune 30, 2017 associated with a consolidated VIE in which the Bancorp has no continuing credit risk due to the risk being assumed by a third party, with an unpaid principal balance of$26, a recorded investment of$26 and an ALLL of$18,respectively.

Fifth Third Bancorp and Subsidiaries

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)

 

 

As of December 31, 2016 ($ in millions)          Unpaid
        Principal
         Balance
   Recorded
Investment
 ALLL       
As of December 31, 2017 ($ in millions)  

Unpaid

Principal

Balance

   Recorded
Investment
       ALLL       

With a related ALLL:

          

Commercial loans and leases:

     

Commercial and industrial loans

  $440          414    94 

Commercial mortgage owner-occupied loans(b)

   24          16    5 

Commercial mortgage nonowner-occupied loans

   7          6    1 

Commercial leases

   2          2     - 

Restructured residential mortgage loans

   471          465    68 

Restructured consumer loans and leases:

     

Home equity

   202          201    30 

Automobile loans

   12          12    2 

Credit card

   52          52    12 

Total impaired portfolio loans and leases with a related ALLL

  $1,210          1,168    212 

With no related ALLL:

     

Commercial loans and leases:

          

Commercial and industrial loans

  $394          320     -   $433              358      87       

Commercial mortgage owner-occupied loans

   36          35     -    16              14      7       

Commercial mortgage nonowner-occupied loans

   93          83     -    4              3       -       

Commercial leases

   2          2     -    4              4       -       

Restructured residential mortgage loans

   207          187     -    469              465      64       

Restructured consumer loans and leases:

     

Restructured consumer loans:

     

Home equity

   107          104     -    172              172      27       

Automobile loans

   3          2     -    8              7      1       

Total impaired portfolio loans and leases with no related ALLL

  $842          733     - 

Credit card

   52              45      14       

Total impaired portfolio loans and leases with a related ALLL

  $1,158              1,068      200       

With no related ALLL:

     

Commercial loans:

     

Commercial and industrial loans

  $151              131       -       

Commercial mortgage owner-occupied loans

   18              15       -       

Commercial mortgage nonowner-occupied loans

   35              35       -       

Restructured residential mortgage loans

   218              200       -       

Restructured consumer loans:

     

Home equity

   97              94       -       

Automobile loans

   2              2       -       

Total impaired portfolio loans with no related ALLL

  $521              477       -       

Total impaired portfolio loans and leases

  $            2,052          1,901  (a)    212   $            1,679              1,545  (a)       200       
(a)

Includes $322, $635$249, $652 and $323,$275, respectively, of commercial, residential mortgage and consumer portfolio TDRs on accrual status and $192, $17$150, $13 and $48,$45, respectively, of commercial, residential mortgage and consumer portfolio TDRs on nonaccrual status at December 31, 2016.

(b)

Excludes five restructured loans at December 31, 2016 associated with a consolidated VIE in which the Bancorp has no continuing credit risk due to the risk being assumed by a third party, with an unpaid principal balance of $26, a recorded investment of $26 and an ALLL of $18.2017.

The following tables summarize the Bancorp’s average impaired portfolio loans and leases, by class, and interest income, by class:

 

    For the three months ended
June 30, 2017
 For the six months ended
June 30, 2017
    For the three months ended
June 30, 2018
 For the six months ended
June 30, 2018
  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

($ in millions)    Average
Recorded
Investment
 

Interest

Income
        Recognized        

 Average
Recorded
    Investment    
  Interest
Income
Recognized  
    Average
Recorded
Investment
 

Interest

Income
    Recognized    

     Average
    Recorded
    Investment
  Interest
Income
Recognized

Commercial loans and leases:

            

Commercial and industrial loans

 $  635       1           668                          2    $  417       5           439                        10   

Commercial mortgage owner-occupied loans(a)

   38       -           42                          -      16       -           20        -   

Commercial mortgage nonowner-occupied loans

   66       -           73          1      29       -           32        -   

Commercial leases

   2       -           3          -      18       -           14        -   

Restructured residential mortgage loans

   654       6           653          12      799       8           732        14   

Restructured consumer loans and leases:

      

Restructured consumer loans:

      

Home equity

   287       3           293          6      248       3           253        6   

Automobile loans

   12       -           13          -      8       -           9        -   

Credit card

    49       1           51          2       46       1           47        2   

Total average impaired portfolio loans and leases

 $            1,743       11           1,796          23    $            1,581       17           1,546        32   

Fifth Third Bancorp and Subsidiaries

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)

      For the three months ended
June 30, 2017
  For the six months ended
June 30, 2017
  

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

($ in millions)    Average
Recorded
Investment
  

Interest

Income
    Recognized    

  Average
Recorded
    Investment    
  Interest    
Income    
Recognized    

Commercial loans and leases:

        

Commercial and industrial loans

 $  635        1          668          2 

Commercial mortgage owner-occupied loans(a)

   38        -          42          - 

Commercial mortgage nonowner-occupied loans

   66        -          73          1 

Commercial leases

   2        -          3          - 

Restructured residential mortgage loans

   654        6          653          12 

Restructured consumer loans:

        

Home equity

   287        3          293          6 

Automobile loans

   12        -          13          - 

Credit card

    49        1          51          2 

Total average impaired loans and leases

 $          1,743        11          1,796          23 
(a)

Excludes five restructured loans associated with a consolidated VIE in which the Bancorp hashad no continuing credit risk due to the risk being assumed by a third party, with an average recorded investment of$26 and an immaterial amount of interest income recognized for both the three and six months endedJune 30, 2017.

Fifth Third Bancorp and Subsidiaries

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)

      

For the three months ended

June 30, 2016

  For the six months ended
June 30, 2016
  

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

($ in millions)    Average
Recorded
Investment
  

Interest

Income
    Recognized    

  Average
Recorded
    Investment    
  Interest
Income
Recognized

Commercial loans and leases:

        

Commercial and industrial loans

 $  762        2    684          4 

Commercial mortgage owner-occupied loans(a)

   68        -    69          1 

Commercial mortgage nonowner-occupied loans

   152        1    160          3 

Commercial construction loans

   2        -    4          - 

Commercial leases

   6        -    5          - 

Restructured residential mortgage loans

   651        6    644          12 

Restructured consumer loans and leases:

        

Home equity

   329        3    336          6 

Automobile loans

   18        -    18          - 

Credit card

    57        1    58          3 

Total average impaired loans and leases

 $          2,045        13    1,978          29 
(a)

Excludes five restructured loans associated with a consolidated VIE in which the Bancorp has no continuing credit risk due to the risk being assumed by a third party, with an average recorded investment of $27 and an immaterial amount of interest income recognized $26 for both the three and six months ended June 30, 2016.2017. An immaterial amount of interest income was recognized during the six months ended June 30, 2017. Refer to Note 9 for further discussion on the deconsolidation of the VIE associated with these loans in the third quarter of 2017.

Nonperforming Assets

Nonperforming assets include nonaccrual loans and leases for which ultimate collectability of the full amount of the principal and/or interest is uncertain; restructured commercial and credit card loans which have not yet met the requirements to be classified as a performing asset; restructured consumer loans which are 90 days past due based on the restructured terms unless the loan is both well-secured and in the process of collection; and certain other assets, including OREO and other repossessed property.

The following table presents the Bancorp’s nonaccrual loans and leases, by class, and OREO and other repossessed property as of:

 

($ in millions)          June 30,
    2017
  December 31,  
2016  
    June 30,
2018
  December 31,  
2017  

Commercial loans and leases:

          

Commercial and industrial loans

  $    447            478          $    263        276     

Commercial mortgage owner-occupied loans(a)

     27            32            10        19     

Commercial mortgage nonowner-occupied loans

     8            9            3        7     

Commercial leases

      3            4           29        4     

Total nonaccrual portfolio commercial loans and leases

      485            523           305        306     

Residential mortgage loans

     32            34            28        30     

Consumer loans and leases:

      

Consumer loans:

    

Home equity

     70            73            71        74     

Automobile loans

     1            2            5        1     

Credit card

      26            28            27        26     

Total nonaccrual portfolio consumer loans and leases

      97            103         

Total nonaccrual portfolio loans and leases(b)(c)

  $    614            660         

Other consumer loans

  1        -     

Total nonaccrual portfolio consumer loans

  104        101     

Total nonaccrual portfolio loans and leases(a)(b)

 $    437        437     

OREO and other repossessed property

      48            78           43        52     

Total nonperforming portfolio assets(b)(c)

  $              662            738         

Total nonperforming portfolio assets(a)(b)

 $        480        489     
(a)

Excludes$19 of restructured nonaccrual loans at bothJune 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 associated with a consolidated VIE in which the Bancorp has no continuing credit risk due to the risk being assumed by a third party.

(b)

Excludes$823and $13$6 of nonaccrual loans held for sale atJune 30, 20172018 and December 31, 2016,2017, respectively.

(c)(b)

Includes$4and $3of nonaccrual government insured commercial loans whose repayments are insured by the SBA at bothJune 30, 20172018 and December 31, 2016 and2017, respectively, of which$12of and $3 are restructured nonaccrual government insured commercial loans at bothJune 30, 20172018and December 31, 2016.2017, respectively.

The Bancorp’s recorded investment of consumer mortgage loans secured by residential real estate properties for which formal foreclosure proceedings are in process according to local requirements of the applicable jurisdiction was $255$189 million and $260$235 million as of June 30, 20172018 and December 31, 2016,2017, respectively.

Troubled Debt Restructurings

If a borrower is experiencing financial difficulty, the Bancorp may consider, in certain circumstances, modifying the terms of their loan to maximize collection of amounts due. Within each of the Bancorp’s loan classes, TDRs typically involve either a reduction of the stated interest rate of the loan, an extension of the loan’s maturity date with a stated rate lower than the current market rate for a new loan with similar risk or, in limited circumstances, a reduction of the principal balance of the loan or the loan’s accrued interest. Modifying the terms of a loan may result in an increase or decrease to the ALLL depending upon the terms modified, the method used to measure the ALLL for a loan prior to modification and whether any charge-offs were recorded on the loan before or at the time of modification. Refer to the ALLL section of Note 1 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in the Bancorp’s Annual Report on Form10-K for the year ended December 31, 20162017 for information on the Bancorp’s ALLL methodology. Upon modification of a loan, the Bancorp measures the related impairment as the difference between the estimated future cash flows expected to be collected on the modified loan, discounted at the original effective yield of the loan, and the carrying value of the loan.

Fifth Third Bancorp and Subsidiaries

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)

The resulting measurement may result in the need for minimal or no allowance because it is probable that all cash flows will be collected under the modified terms of the loan.

Fifth Third Bancorp and Subsidiaries

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)

In addition, if the stated interest rate was increased in a TDR, the cash flows on the modified loan, using thepre-modification interest rate as the discount rate, often exceed the recorded investment of the loan. Conversely, upon a modification that reduces the stated interest rate on a loan, the Bancorp recognizes an impairment loss as an increase to the ALLL. If a TDR involves a reduction of the principal balance of the loan or the loan’s accrued interest, that amount is charged off to the ALLL.

As of June 30, 2017, theThe Bancorp had $60 million and $64 million in line of credit and letter of credit commitments respectively, compared to $82 million and $57 million in line of credit and letter of credit commitments as of December 31, 2016, respectively, to lend additional funds to borrowers whose terms have been modified in a TDR.TDR, consisting of line of credit and letter of credit commitments of $29 million and $69 million, respectively, as of June 30, 2018 compared with $53 million and $78 million, respectively, as of December 31, 2017.

The following tables provide a summary of loans and leases, by class, modified in a TDR by the Bancorp during the three months ended:

 

June 30, 2017 ($ in millions)(a)  Number of loans
modified in a TDR
during the period(b)
     

Recorded investment
in loans modified
in a TDR

during the period

   Increase
to ALLL upon
modification
   Charge-offs
recognized upon
modification
 
June 30, 2018 ($ in millions)(a)  Number of Loans
Modified in a TDR
During the Period(b)
     

Recorded Investment
in Loans Modified

in a TDR

During the Period

   

(Decrease)
Increase

to ALLL Upon
Modification

   Charge-offs
Recognized Upon
Modification
 

Commercial loans:

                    

Commercial and industrial loans

   17      $            56        1        4           13      $              64        (4)         -        

Commercial mortgage owner-occupied loans

   2      6        5        -       

Commercial mortgage nonowner-occupied loans

   1      -        -        -       

Residential mortgage loans

   199      28        1        -          537      91        2         -        

Consumer loans:

                    

Home equity

   44      3        -        -          29      2        -         -        

Automobile loans

   15      -        -        -          19      -        -         -        

Credit card

   2,152      10        2        1          1,675      9        2         1        

Total portfolio loans

   2,430      $            103        9        5          2,273      $            166        -         1        
(a)

Excludes all loans and leases held for sale and loans acquired with deteriorated credit quality which were accounted for within a pool.

(b)

Represents number of loans post-modification and excludes loans previously modified in a TDR.

 

June 30, 2016 ($ in millions)(a)  Number of loans
modified in a TDR
during the period(b)
     

Recorded investment
in loans modified

in a TDR

during the period

   Increase
to ALLL upon
modification
   Charge-offs
recognized upon
modification
 
June 30, 2017 ($ in millions)(a)  Number of Loans
Modified in a TDR
During the Period(b)
     

Recorded Investment
in Loans Modified

in a TDR

During the Period

   

Increase

to ALLL Upon
Modification

   Charge-offs
Recognized Upon
Modification
 

Commercial loans:

                    

Commercial and industrial loans

   20      $              61    11          -          17      $              56        1           4        

Commercial mortgage owner-occupied loans

   3      2    -          -          2      6        5           -        

Commercial mortgage nonowner-occupied loans

   2      5    1          -          1      -        -           -        

Residential mortgage loans

   262      37    2          -          199      28        1           -        

Consumer loans:

                    

Home equity

   62      2    -          -          44      3        -           -        

Automobile loans

   58      1    -          -          15      -        -           -        

Credit card

   2,262      11    2          1          2,152      10        2           1        

Total portfolio loans

   2,669      $            119    16          1          2,430      $            103        9           5        
(a)

Excludes all loans and leases held for sale and loans acquired with deteriorated credit quality which were accounted for within a pool.

(b)

Represents number of loans post-modification and excludes loans previously modified in a TDR.

The following tables provide a summary of loans and leases, by class, modified in a TDR by the Bancorp during the six months ended:

 

June 30, 2017 ($ in millions)(a)  Number of loans
modified in a TDR
during the period(b)
     

Recorded investment
in loans modified

in a TDR

during the period

   Increase
to ALLL upon
modification
   Charge-offs
recognized upon
modification
 

Commercial loans and leases:

          
June 30, 2018 ($ in millions)(a)  Number of Loans
Modified in a TDR
During the Period(b)
     

Recorded Investment
in Loans Modified

in a TDR

During the Period

   Increase
(Decrease)
to ALLL Upon
Modification
   Charge-offs
Recognized Upon
Modification
 

Commercial loans:

          

Commercial and industrial loans

   50      $            153        2          6          25      $            135        9          -       

Commercial mortgage owner-occupied loans

   7      8        5          -          2      -        -          -       

Commercial mortgage nonowner-occupied loans

   2      -        -          -       

Residential mortgage loans

   402      57        3          -          784      124        3          -       

Consumer loans:

                    

Home equity

   75      5        -          -          54      4        -          -       

Automobile loans

   45      -        -          -          39      -        -          -       

Credit card

   3,908      17        3          1          3,640      19        4          1       

Total portfolio loans and leases

   4,489      $            240        13          7       

Total portfolio loans

   4,544      $            282        16          1       
(a)

Excludes all loans and leases held for sale and loans acquired with deteriorated credit quality which were accounted for within a pool.

(b)

Represents number of loans post-modification and excludes loans previously modified in a TDR.

Fifth Third Bancorp and Subsidiaries

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)

 

 

June 30, 2016 ($ in millions)(a)  Number of loans
modified in a TDR
during the  period(b)
   

Recorded investment
in loans modified

in a TDR

during the period

   Increase
(Decrease)
to ALLL upon
modification
   Charge-offs
recognized upon
modification
 

Commercial loans:

        
June 30, 2017 ($ in millions)(a) Number of Loans
Modified in a TDR
During the Period(b)
     Recorded Investment    
in Loans and Leases
Modified in a TDR
During the Period
 

Increase

    to ALLL Upon    
Modification

 Charge-offs
Recognized Upon
Modification
 

Commercial loans and leases:

    

Commercial and industrial loans

   44    $          117        9         -        50  $          153            2             6       

Commercial mortgage owner-occupied loans

   10    8        (2)        -        7  8            5              -       

Commercial mortgage nonowner-occupied loans

   4    5        1         -       2   -             -              -       

Residential mortgage loans

   505    73        4         -       402  57            3              -       

Consumer loans:

            

Home equity

   126    7        -        -       75  5             -              -       

Automobile loans

   136    2        -        -       45   -             -              -       

Credit card

   4,854    23        4         2       3,908  17            3             1       

Total portfolio loans

   5,679    $          235        16         2       

Total portfolio loans and leases

 4,489  $          240            13             7       
(a)

Excludes all loans and leases held for sale and loans acquired with deteriorated credit quality which were accounted for within a pool.

(b)

Represents number of loans post-modification and excludes loans previously modified in a TDR.

The Bancorp considers TDRs that become 90 days or more past due under the modified terms as subsequently defaulted. For commercial loans not subject to individual review for impairment, loss rates that are applied for purposes of determining the ALLL include historical losses associated with subsequent defaults on loans previously modified in a TDR. For consumer loans, the Bancorp performs a qualitative assessment of the adequacy of the consumer ALLL by comparing the consumer ALLL to forecasted consumer losses over the projected loss emergence period (the forecasted losses include the impact of subsequent defaults of consumer TDRs). When a residential mortgage, home equity, automobile or other consumer loan that has been modified in a TDR subsequently defaults, the present value of expected cash flows used in the measurement of the potential impairment loss is generally limited to the expected net proceeds from the sale of the loan’s underlying collateral and any resulting impairment loss is reflected as acharge-off or an increase in ALLL. The Bancorp recognizes an ALLL for the entire balance of the credit card loans modified in a TDR that subsequently default.

The following tables provide a summary of TDRs that subsequently defaulted during the three months ended June 30, 20172018 and 20162017 and were within twelve months of the restructuring date:

 

June 30, 2017 ($ in millions)(a)  Number of
Contracts
     Recorded
  Investment
 
June 30, 2018 ($ in millions)(a)  Number of
Contracts
     Recorded
  Investment
 

Commercial loans:

        

Commercial and industrial loans

   2   $15             2   $28          

Commercial mortgage owner-occupied loans

   3    1          

Residential mortgage loans

   26    3             62    13          

Consumer loans:

        

Home equity

   6    1          

Credit card

   387    2             137    1          

Total portfolio loans

   424   $                    22              201   $                    42           
(a)

Excludes all loans and leases held for sale and loans acquired with deteriorated credit quality.

 

June 30, 2016 ($ in millions)(a)  Number of
Contracts
     Recorded
  Investment
 
June 30, 2017 ($ in millions)(a)  Number of
Contracts
     Recorded
  Investment
 

Commercial loans:

        

Commercial and industrial loans

   2   $3             2   $15          

Commercial mortgage nonowner-occupied loans

   1    -             3    1          

Residential mortgage loans

   33    5             26    3          

Consumer loans:

        

Home equity

   2    -             6    1          

Credit card

   351    1             387    2          

Total portfolio loans

   389   $                      9              424   $                      22           
(a)

Excludes all loans and leases held for sale and loans acquired with deteriorated credit quality.

Fifth Third Bancorp and Subsidiaries

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)

The following tables provide a summary of TDRs that subsequently defaulted during the six months ended June 30, 20172018 and 20162017 and were within twelve months of the restructuring date:

 

June 30, 2017 ($ in millions)(a)  Number of
Contracts
     Recorded  
  Investment  
 

Commercial loans and leases:

    
June 30, 2018 ($ in millions)(a)  Number of
Contracts
   

  Recorded

  Investment

 

Commercial loans:

    

Commercial and industrial loans

   4   $16              3   $29          

Commercial mortgage owner-occupied loans

   3    1              2    -          

Residential mortgage loans

   83    12              110    20          

Consumer loans:

        

Home equity

   11    2              2    -          

Credit card

   837    4              379    2          

Total portfolio loans and leases

   938   $                    35            

Total portfolio loans

   496   $                      51           
(a)

Excludes all loans and leases held for sale and loans acquired with deteriorated credit quality.

Fifth Third Bancorp and Subsidiaries

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)

 

June 30, 2016 ($ in millions)(a)  Number of
Contracts
   

Recorded

Investment

 

Commercial loans:

    

Commercial and industrial loans

   3   $3            

Commercial mortgage nonowner-occupied loans

   2    -            

Residential mortgage loans

   86    12            

Consumer loans:

    

Home equity

   8    1            

Credit card

   774    3            

Total portfolio loans

   873   $                    19             

June 30, 2017 ($ in millions)(a)  Number of
Contracts
   

  Recorded

  Investment

 

Commercial loans:

    

Commercial and industrial loans

      $16            

Commercial mortgage nonowner-occupied loans

       1            

Residential mortgage loans

   83     12            

Consumer loans:

    

Home equity

   11     2            

Credit card

   837     4            

Total portfolio loans

   938    $                      35             
(a)

Excludes all loans and leases held for sale and loans acquired with deteriorated credit quality.

Fifth Third Bancorp and Subsidiaries

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)

7. Bank Premises and Equipment

The following table provides a summary of bank premises and equipment as of:

 

($ in millions)      June 30, 2017        December 31, 2016           June 30, 2018        December 31, 2017     

Land and improvements(a)

 $      647            663            $     599           644               

Buildings(a)

    1,574            1,672               1,616           1,679               

Equipment

    1,762            1,761               1,936           1,876               

Leasehold improvements

    394            398               396           399               

Construction in progress(a)

    120            99               85           93               

Bank premises and equipment held for sale:

          

Land and improvements

    28            29               24           17               

Buildings

    12            9               10           9               

Equipment

    1            1               3           1               

Accumulated depreciation and amortization

    (2,497)           (2,567)              (2,754)          (2,715)              

Total bank premises and equipment

 $    2,041                            2,065            $     1,915                           2,003                
(a)

AtJune 30, 20172018 and December 31, 2016,2017, land and improvements, buildings and construction in progress included$9155 and $92,$91, respectively, associated with parcels of undeveloped land intended for future branch expansion.

The Bancorp monitors changing customer preferences associated with the channels it uses for banking transactions to evaluate the efficiency, competitiveness and quality of the customer service experience in its consumer distribution network. As part of this ongoing assessment, the Bancorp may determine that it is no longer fully committed to maintaining full-service branches at certain of its existing banking center locations. Similarly, the Bancorp may also determine that it is no longer fully committed to building banking centers on certain parcels of land which had previously been held for future branch expansion.

During the second quarter of 2018, the Bancorp adopted a plan to close approximately 100 to 125 branches over the next three years (the “2018 Branch Optimization Plan”). As of June 30, 2018, the Bancorp had identified 29 specific branches for closure under the 2018 Branch Optimization Plan with these closures expected to be completed prior to December 31, 2018. The Bancorp performsexpects to identify the remaining branches to be closed under the 2018 Branch Optimization Plan over the next 12 to 18 months. As part of the adoption of the 2018 Branch Optimization Plan, the Bancorp has also elected to sell 21 parcels of land which had previously been held for future branch expansion.

As a result of the adoption of the 2018 Branch Optimization Plan during the second quarter of 2018, the Bancorp performed assessments of the recoverability of the following long-lived assets when events or changes in circumstances indicatefor which the Bancorp believes that it is more likely than not that the assets will be disposed of significantly before the end of their carrying values may notpreviously estimated useful lives:

29 branches specifically identified for closure prior to December 31, 2018

128 branches from which the remaining closures under the 2018 Branch Optimization Plan are expected to be recoverable. selected

21 parcels of land that the Bancorp has elected to sell

Impairment losses associated with such assessments and lower of cost or market adjustments were $33 million and $41 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2018, respectively, and $2 million and $5 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017, respectively, and $1 million and $3 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2016, respectively. The recognized impairment losses were recorded in other noninterest income in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income.

Fifth Third Bancorp and Subsidiaries

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)

8. Operating Lease Equipment

The Bancorp performs assessments of the recoverability of long-lived assets when events or changes in circumstances indicate that their carrying values may not be recoverable. As a result of these recoverability assessments, the Bancorp recognized impairment losses associated with certain operating lease assets of an immaterial amount and $31 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017, respectively, and $5 million for both the three and six months ended June 30, 2016. The recognized impairment losses were recorded in corporate banking revenue in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income.

9. Intangible Assets

Intangible assets consist of core deposit intangibles, customer lists,relationships,non-compete agreements, trade names and rent intangibles. Intangible assets are amortized on either a straight-line or an accelerated basis over their estimated useful lives. The increase in gross carrying amount of intangible assets from the year ended December 31, 2017 primarily reflects acquisition activity during the first quarter of 2018.

The details of the Bancorp’s intangible assets are shown in the following table:

 

($ in millions)  

Gross Carrying

Amount

       Accumulated        
    Amortization         
   Net Carrying        
Amount        
   

Gross Carrying

Amount

       Accumulated        
    Amortization         
   Net Carrying        
Amount        
 

As of June 30, 2017

      

As of June 30, 2018

      

Core deposit intangibles

  $34                      (28)                6               $34                      (29)                5             

Customer relationships

   20                      (1)                19             

Non-compete agreements

   14                      (11)                3             

Other

   25                      (13)                12                6                      (3)                3             

Total intangible assets

  $59                      (41)                18               $74                      (44)                30             

As of December 31, 2016

      

As of December 31, 2017

      

Core deposit intangibles

  $34                      (27)                7               $34                      (29)                5             

Customer relationships

   16                  -                  16             

Non-compete agreements

   13                      (10)                3             

Other

   15                      (13)                2                6                      (3)                3             

Total intangible assets

  $                    49                       (40)                9               $                    69                       (42)                27             

As of June 30, 2017,2018, all of the Bancorp’s intangible assets were being amortized. Amortization expense recognized on intangible assets was $1 million and immaterial for both the three months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively, and 2016$2 million and $1 million for both the six months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017, and 2016.respectively. The Bancorp’s projection of amortization expense shown onin the following table is based on existing balances as of June 30, 2017.2018. Future amortization expense may vary from these projections.

Estimated amortization expense for the remainder of 2017 through 2021 is as follows:

($ in millions)       Total             

Remainder of 2017

  $        1             

2018

     2             

2019

     2             

2020

     2             

2021

        2             

Fifth Third Bancorp and Subsidiaries

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)

 

Estimated amortization expense for the remainder of 2018 through 2022 is as follows:

($ in millions)      Total             

Remainder of 2018

 $     3             

2019

    5             

2020

    3             

2021

    3             

2022

       2             

Fifth Third Bancorp and Subsidiaries

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)

 

10.

9. Variable Interest Entities

The Bancorp, in the normal course of business, engages in a variety of activities that involve VIEs, which are legal entities that lack sufficient equity at risk to finance their activities without additional subordinated financial support or the equity investors of the entities as a group lack any of the characteristics of a controlling interest. The Bancorp evaluates its interest in certain entities to determine if these entities meet the definition of a VIE and whether the Bancorp is the primary beneficiary and should consolidate the entity based on the variable interests it held both at inception and when there is a change in circumstances that requires a reconsideration. If the Bancorp is determined to be the primary beneficiary of a VIE, it must account for the VIE as a consolidated subsidiary. If the Bancorp is determined not to be the primary beneficiary of a VIE but holds a variable interest in the entity, such variable interests are accounted for under the equity method of accounting or other accounting standards as appropriate.

Consolidated VIEs

The following tables provide a summary of the classifications of consolidated VIE assets, liabilities and noncontrolling interests included in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of:

 

June 30, 2017 ($ in millions)       Automobile Loan
Securitizations
   

CDC

Investments

      Total 
June 30, 2018 ($ in millions)       Automobile Loan
Securitizations
   

        CDC        

        Investments        

       Total     

Assets:

                  

Cash and due from banks

  $    56             1                    57 

Other short-term investments

  $     47               -           47 

Commercial mortgage loans

     -             46                    46      -               20           20 

Automobile loans

     691             -                    691      888               -           888 

ALLL

     (4)            (20)                   (24     (5)              -           (5

Other assets

      7             -                    7       5               -           5 

Total assets

  $    750             27                    777   $     935               20           955 

Liabilities:

                  

Other liabilities

  $    1             -                    1   $     2               -           2 

Long-term debt

      618             -                    618       830               -           830 

Total liabilities

  $    619             -                    619   $     832               -           832 

Noncontrolling interests

  $    -                                 27                     27   $     -               20           20 
                    
December 31, 2016 ($ in millions)       Automobile Loan
Securitizations
   

CDC

Investments

      Total 
December 31, 2017 ($ in millions)       Automobile Loan
Securitizations
   

    CDC

    Investments

       Total     

Assets:

                  

Cash and due from banks

  $    84             1                    85 

Other short-term investments

  $     62               -           62 

Commercial mortgage loans

     -             46                    46      -               20           20 

Automobile loans

     1,170             -                                1,170      1,277               -           1,277 

ALLL

     (6)            (20)                   (26     (6)              -           (6

Other assets

      9             -                    9       7               -           7 

Total assets

  $    1,257             27                    1,284   $     1,340               20           1,360 

Liabilities

                  

Other liabilities

  $    3             -                    3   $     2               -           2 

Long-term debt

      1,094             -                    1,094       1,190               -           1,190 

Total liabilities

  $    1,097             -                    1,097   $     1,192               -           1,192 

Noncontrolling interests

  $    -             27                    27   $     -               20           20 

Automobile loan securitizations

TheIn a securitization transaction that occurred in the third quarter of 2017, the Bancorp has previouslytransferred an aggregate amount of $1.1 billion in consumer automobile loans to a bankruptcy remote trust which was deemed to be a VIE. This trust then subsequently issued approximately $1.0 billion of asset-backed notes, of which approximately $261 million were retained by the Bancorp. Additionally, in prior years the Bancorp completed securitization transactions in which the Bancorp transferred certain consumer automobile loans to bankruptcy remote trusts which were also deemed to be VIEs. The primary purposes of the VIEs were to issue asset-backed securities with varying levels of credit subordination and payment priority, as well as residual interests, and to provide the Bancorp with access to liquidity for its originated loans. The Bancorp retained residual interests in the VIEs and, therefore, has an obligation to absorb losses and a right to receive benefits from the VIEs that could potentially be significant to the VIEs. In addition, the Bancorp retained servicing rights for the underlying loans and, therefore, holds the power to direct the activities of the VIEs that most significantly impact the economic performance of the VIEs. As a result, the Bancorp concluded that it is the primary beneficiary of the VIEs and therefore, has consolidated these VIEs. The assets of the VIEs are restricted to the settlement of the asset-backed securities and other obligations of the VIEs. Third-party holders of the notes do not have recourse to the general assets of the Bancorp.

The economic performance of the VIEs is most significantly impacted by the performance of the underlying loans. The principal risks to which the VIEs are exposed include credit risk and prepayment risk. The credit and prepayment risks are managed through credit enhancements in the form of reserve accounts, overcollateralization, excess interest on the loans and the subordination of certain classes of asset-backed securities to other classes.

Fifth Third Bancorp and Subsidiaries

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)

 

 

CDC investments

CDC, a wholly-owned indirect subsidiary of the Bancorp, was created to invest in projects to create affordable housing, revitalize business and residential areas and preserve historic landmarks. CDC generallyco-invests with other unrelated companies and/or individuals and typically makes investments in a separate legal entity that owns the property under development. The entities are usually formed as limited partnerships and LLCs and CDC typically invests as a limited partner/investor member in the form of equity contributions. The economic performance of the VIEs is driven by the performance of their underlying investment projects as well as the VIEs’ ability to operate in compliance with the rules and regulations necessary for the qualification of tax credits generated by equity investments. The Bancorp’s subsidiaries serve as the managing member of certain LLCs invested in business revitalization projects and have the right to make decisions that most significantly impact the economic performance of the LLCs. Additionally, the investor members do not ownhold substantivekick-out rights or substantive participating rights over the managing member. The Bancorp has provided an indemnification guarantee to the investor member of these LLCs related to the qualification of tax credits generated by the investor members’ investment. Accordingly, the Bancorp concluded that it is the primary beneficiary and, therefore, has consolidated these VIEs. As a result, the investor members’ interests in these VIEs are presented as noncontrolling interests in the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements. This presentation includes reporting separately the equity attributable to the noncontrolling interests in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets and Condensed Consolidated Statements of Changes in Equity and reporting separately the comprehensive income attributable to the noncontrolling interests in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income and the net income attributable to the noncontrolling interests in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income.

During the third quarter of 2017, the Bancorp’s indemnification guarantee for one of the CDC investments for which a Bancorp subsidiary served as the managing member expired and the Bancorp transferred its remaining ownership interest in the VIE to the investor member thus removing the Bancorp from future operations of the VIE. As a result, the Bancorp deconsolidated the VIE during the third quarter of 2017 resulting in a decrease of $27 million in commercial mortgage loans, a decrease of $20 million in ALLL associated with the commercial mortgage loans and a decrease of $18 million in indemnification guarantee exposure. The Bancorp’s maximum exposure related to thesethe remaining indemnifications at June 30, 20172018 and December 31, 20162017 was $34$19 million and $31$17 million, respectively, which is based on an amount required to meet the investor member’s defined target rate of return.

Non-consolidated VIEs

The following tables provide a summary of assets and liabilities carried on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets related tonon-consolidated VIEs for which the Bancorp holds an interest, but is not the primary beneficiary of the VIE, as well as the Bancorp’s maximum exposure to losses associated with its interests in the entities as of:

 

June 30, 2017 ($ in millions)  

Total

Assets

  Total        
Liabilities        
  Maximum            
Exposure             
June 30, 2018 ($ in millions)  

Total     

Assets    

         Total      
       Liabilities      
   Maximum      
Exposure      
 

CDC investments

  $              1,495                  413        1,495               $             1,213        363              1,213          

Private equity investments

                     116                       -           170               70        -              112          

Loans provided to VIEs

                  2,060                       -        3,000               1,885        -              3,124          
               
December 31, 2016 ($ in millions)  

Total

Assets

  Total        
Liabilities        
  Maximum            
Exposure             
December 31, 2017 ($ in millions)  

Total     

Assets    

         Total      
       Liabilities      
   Maximum      
Exposure      
 

CDC investments

  $              1,421                  357        1,421               $             1,376        355              1,376          

Private equity investments

                     176                      -          232               102        -              150          

Loans provided to VIEs

                  1,735                       -        2,672               1,845        -              2,910          

CDC investments

As noted previously, CDC typically invests in VIEs as a limited partner or investor member in the form of equity contributions and has no substantivekick-out or substantive participating rights over the managing member. The Bancorp has determined that it is not the primary beneficiary of these VIEs because it lacks the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact the economic performance of the underlying project or the VIEs’ ability to operate in compliance with the rules and regulations necessary for the qualification of tax credits generated by equity investments. This power is held by the managing members who exercise full and exclusive control of the operations of the VIEs. Accordingly, the Bancorp accounts for these investments under the equity method of accounting.

The Bancorp’s funding requirements are limited to its invested capital and any additional unfunded commitments for future equity contributions. The Bancorp’s maximum exposure to loss as a result of its involvement with the VIEs is limited to the carrying amounts of the investments, including the unfunded commitments. The carrying amounts of these investments, which are included in other assets in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets, and the liabilities related to the unfunded commitments, which are included in other liabilities in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets, are included in the previous tables for all periods presented. The Bancorp has no other liquidity arrangements or obligations to purchase assets of the VIEs that would expose the Bancorp to a loss. In certain arrangements, the general partner/managing member of the VIE has guaranteed a level of projected tax credits to be received by the limited partners/investor members, thereby minimizing a portion of the Bancorp’s risk.

At June 30, 20172018 and December 31, 2016,2017, the Bancorp’s CDC investments included $1.4$1.2 billion and $1.3 billion, respectively, of investments in affordable housing tax credits recognized in other assets in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. The unfunded commitments related to these investments were $412$362 million and $349$355 million at June 30, 20172018 and December 31, 2016,2017, respectively. The unfunded commitments as of June 30, 20172018 are expected to be funded from 20172018 to 2034.

Fifth Third Bancorp and Subsidiaries

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)

 

 

The Bancorp has accounted for all of its investments in qualified affordable housing tax credits using the equity method of accounting. The following table summarizes the impact to the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income relating to investments in qualified affordable housing investments:

 

  Condensed Consolidated      For the three months ended
June 30,
     For the six months ended
June 30,
   Condensed Consolidated     For the three months ended    
June 30,
     For the six months ended    
June 30,
 
($ in millions)  Statements of Income Caption                   2017   2016   2017   2016     Statements of Income Caption    2018   2017 2018       2017     

Pre-tax investment and impairment losses(a)

  Other noninterest expense  $   35  37        72  73        Other noninterest expense   $    46       35      91       72    

Tax credits and other benefits

  Applicable income tax expense    (56 (56)       (112 (111)       Applicable income tax expense    (51)      (56)         (103)          (112)   
(a)

The Bancorp did not recognize impairment losses resulting from the forfeiture or ineligibility of tax credits or other circumstances during both the three and six months endedJune 30, 20172018 and 2016.2017.

Private equity investments

The Bancorp, through Fifth Third Capital Holdings, a wholly-owned indirect subsidiary of the Bancorp, invests as a limited partner in private equity investments which provide the Bancorp an opportunity to obtain higher rates of return on invested capital, while also creating cross-selling opportunities for the Bancorp’s commercial products. Each of the limited partnerships has an unrelated third-party general partner responsible for appointing the fund manager. The Bancorp has not been appointed fund manager for any of these private equity investments. The funds finance primarily all of their activities from the partners’ capital contributions and investment returns. The Bancorp has determined that it is not the primary beneficiary of the funds because it does not have the obligation to absorb the funds’ expected losses or the right to receive the funds’ expected residual returns that could potentially be significant to the funds and lacks the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact the economic performance of the funds. The Bancorp, as a limited partner, does not have substantive participating or substantivekick-out rights over the general partner. Therefore, the Bancorp accounts for its investments in these limited partnerships under the equity method of accounting.

The Bancorp is exposed to losses arising from the negative performance of the underlying investments in the private equity investments. As a limited partner, the Bancorp’s maximum exposure to loss is limited to the carrying amounts of the investments plus unfunded commitments. The carrying amounts of these investments, which are included in other assets in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets, are included in the previous tables. Also, at June 30, 20172018 and December 31, 2016,2017, the unfunded commitment amounts to the funds were $54$42 million and $56$48 million, respectively. As part of previous commitments, the Bancorp made capital contributions to private equity investments of $2 million and an immaterial amount and $6 million during the three months ended June 30, 20172018 and 2016,2017, respectively and $7$5 million and $8$7 million during the six months ended June 30, 20172018 and 2016,2017, respectively. The Bancorp did not recognizerecognized $2 million and zero of OTTI on itsprimarily associated with certain nonconforming investments in private equity fundsaffected by the Volcker Rule during both the three months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively, and $6 million and zero during the six months ended June 30, 20172018 and 2016.2017. Refer to Note 21 for further information.

Loans provided to VIEs

The Bancorp has provided funding to certain unconsolidated VIEs sponsored by third parties. These VIEs are generally established to finance certain consumer and small business loans originated by third parties. The entities are primarily funded through the issuance of a loan from the Bancorp or a syndication through which the Bancorp is involved. The sponsor/administrator of the entities is responsible for servicing the underlying assets in the VIEs. Because the sponsor/administrator, not the Bancorp, holds the servicing responsibilities, which include the establishment and employment of default mitigation policies and procedures, the Bancorp does not hold the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact the economic performance of the entity and, therefore, is not the primary beneficiary.

The principal risk to which these entities are exposed is credit risk related to the underlying assets. The Bancorp’s maximum exposure to loss is equal to the carrying amounts of the loans and unfunded commitments to the VIEs. The Bancorp’s outstanding loans to these VIEs are included in commercial loans in Note 5. As of June 30, 20172018 and December 31, 2016,2017, the Bancorp’s unfunded commitments to these entities were $940 million$1.2 billion and $937 million,$1.1 billion, respectively. The loans and unfunded commitments to these VIEs are included in the Bancorp’s overall analysis of the ALLL and reserve for unfunded commitments, respectively. The Bancorp does not provide any implicit or explicit liquidity guarantees or principal value guarantees to these VIEs.

Fifth Third Bancorp and Subsidiaries

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)

 

 

11.10. Sales of Receivables and Servicing Rights

Residential Mortgage Loan Sales

The Bancorp sold fixed and adjustable-rate residential mortgage loans during both the three and six months ended June 30, 20172018 and 2016.2017. In those sales, the Bancorp obtained servicing responsibilities and provided certain standard representations and warranties, however the investors have no recourse to the Bancorp’s other assets for failure of debtors to pay when due. The Bancorp receives annual servicing fees based on a percentage of the outstanding balance. The Bancorp identifies classes of servicing assets based on financial asset type and interest rates.

Information related to residential mortgage loan sales and the Bancorp’s mortgage banking activity, which is included in mortgage banking net revenue in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income, is as follows:

 

     For the three months ended
June 30,
     For the six months ended
June 30,
     For the three months ended 
June 30,
     For the six months ended    
June 30,

($ in millions)

    2017 2016    2017 2016        2018 2017    2018 2017

Residential mortgage loan sales(a)

 $  1,518 1,631   3,147       2,745         $ 1,474  1,518  2,474   3,147    

Origination fees and gains on loan sales

       37     54   66             95           28      37       52   66

Gross mortgage servicing fees

      49     50  97             102              54      49     106    97
(a)

Represents the unpaid principal balance at the time of the sale.

Servicing Rights

Effective January 1, 2017, theThe Bancorp elected to prospectively adopt the fair value method formeasures all classes of its residential mortgage servicing rights portfolio. Upon this election, all servicing rights are measured at fair value at each reporting date andwith changes in the fair value of servicing rights are reported in mortgage banking net revenue in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income in the period in which the changes occur. The election of the fair value method did not require a cumulative effect adjustment to retained earnings as there was no difference between the carrying value of the servicing rights, net of valuation allowance, and the fair value.

Prior to the election of the fair value method, servicing rights were initially recorded at fair value and subsequently amortized in proportion to, and over the period of, estimated net servicing revenue. Servicing rights were assessed for impairment monthly, based on fair value, with temporary impairment recognized through a valuation allowance.Income.

The following tables presenttable presents changes in the servicing rights related to residential mortgage and automobile loans for the six months ended June 30:

 

($ in millions)2017

Balance, beginning of period

$                      744      

Servicing rights originated - residential mortgage loans

66      

Servicing rights acquired - residential mortgage loans

109      

Changes in fair value:

Due to changes in inputs or assumptions(a)

(13)     

Other changes in fair value(b)

(57)     

Balance, end of period

$849      
($ in millions)  2018   2017 

Balance, beginning of period

  $                858                      744     

Servicing rights originated - residential mortgage loans

   35      66     

Servicing rights acquired - residential mortgage loans

   50      109     

Changes in fair value:

    

Due to changes in inputs or assumptions(a)

   78      (13)     

Other changes in fair value(b)

   (62)      (57)     

Balance, end of period

  $959      849     
(a)

Primarily reflects changes in prepayment speed and OAS spread assumptions which are updated based on market interest rates.

(b)

Primarily reflects changes due to collection of contractual cash flows and the passage of time.

($ in millions)2016

Carrying amount before valuation allowance:

Balance, beginning of period

$                      1,204      

Servicing rights that result from the transfer of residential mortgage loans

28      

Amortization

(61)    

Balance, end of period

$1,171     

Valuation allowance for servicing rights:

Balance, beginning of period

$(419)    

Provision for MSR impairment

(131)    

Balance, end of period

(550)    

Carrying amount after valuation allowance

$621     

For the three and six months ended June 30, 2016, temporary impairment, effected through a change in the MSR valuation allowance, was captured as a component of mortgage banking net revenue in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income. Amortization expense recognized on servicing rights for the three and six months ended June 30, 2016 was $35 million and $61 million, respectively.

The Bancorp maintains anon-qualifying hedging strategy to manage a portion of the risk associated with changes in the value of the MSR portfolio. This strategy may include the purchase of free-standing derivatives and variousavailable-for-sale and trading securities. The interest income,mark-to-market adjustments and gain or loss from sale activities associated with these portfolios are expected to economically hedge a portion of the change in value of the MSR portfolio caused by fluctuating OAS spreads, earnings rates and prepayment speeds. The fair value of the servicing asset is based on the present value of expected future cash flows.

Fifth Third Bancorp and Subsidiaries

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)

The following table displays the beginning and ending fair value of the servicing rights for the six months ended June 30:

($ in millions) 2017  2016 

Fixed-rate residential mortgage loans:

  

Balance, beginning of period

 $                722                 757     

Balance, end of period

  830     598     

Adjustable-rate residential mortgage loans:

  

Balance, beginning of period

  22     27     

Balance, end of period

  19     23     

Fixed-rate automobile loans:

  

Balance, beginning of period

  -     1     

Balance, end of period

  -     -      

The following table presents activity related to valuations of the MSR portfolio and the impact of thenon-qualifying hedging strategy:

 

       For the three months ended 
June 30,
        For the six months ended  
June 30,
 
($ in millions)    2017   2016              2017   2016         

Securities gains, net -non-qualifying hedges on MSRs

 $  2   -           2   -        

Changes in fair value and settlement of free-standing derivatives purchased to economically hedge the MSR portfolio(a)

   16   51           15   149       

MSR fair value adjustment(a)

   (47  -           (70  -        

Provision for MSR impairment(a)

       (45)             -   (131)       
       For the three months ended 
June 30,
    

  For the six months ended  

June 30,

($ in millions)    2018  2017      2018  2017  

Securities (losses) gains, net -non-qualifying hedges on MSRs

 $  (4     2   (17     2

Changes in fair value and settlement of free-standing derivatives purchased to economically hedge the MSR portfolio(a)

   (16   16   (65   15

MSR fair value adjustment due to changes in inputs or assumptions(a)

    21    (17)    78    (13)
(a)

Included in mortgage banking net revenue in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income.

The key economic assumptions used in measuring the interests in residential mortgage loans that continued to be held by the Bancorp at the date of sale, securitization or securitizationpurchase resulting from transactions completed during the three months ended June 30, 20172018 and 20162017 were as follows:

 

    June 30, 2018      June 30, 2017 
    June 30, 2017        June 30, 2016 
  Rate  Weighted-
Average Life
(in years)
   

Prepayment
Speed

(annual)

 

OAS

Spread

(bps)

        Weighted-
Average Life
(in years)
   

Prepayment
Speed

(annual)

 

OAS

Spread

(bps)

  Rate Weighted-
Average Life
(in years)
 

    Prepayment    
    Speed    

    (annual)    

 OAS Spread
(bps)
    Weighted-
Average Life
(in years)
 

    Prepayment    
Speed

(annual)

   OAS Spread
(bps)
 

Residential mortgage loans:

                       

Servicing rights

  Fixed   7.0    10.3 %   492      6.7    11.9%  548  Fixed  6.8        10.0 %   519        7.0       10.3 %    492      

Servicing rights

  Adjustable   3.0    29.8        659       2.9    29.8  683  Adjustable  -        -        -       3.0       29.8        659      

Fifth Third Bancorp and Subsidiaries

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)

Based on historical credit experience, expected credit losses for residential mortgage loan servicing rights have been deemed immaterial, as the Bancorp sold the majority of the underlying loans without recourse. At June 30, 20172018 and December 31, 2016,2017, the Bancorp serviced $61.8$62.2 billion and $53.6$60.0 billion, respectively, of residential mortgage loans for other investors. The value of MSRs that continue to be held by the Bancorp is subject to credit, prepayment and interest rate risks on the sold financial assets.

At June 30, 2017,2018, the sensitivity of the current fair value of residual cash flows to immediate 10%, 20% and 50% adverse changes in prepayment speed assumptions and immediate 10% and 20% adverse changes in OAS spread are as follows:

 

              Prepayment
Speed Assumption
 OAS
Spread Assumption
               

Prepayment

Speed Assumption

 

OAS

Spread Assumption

 
   

Fair 

Value

    

Weighted-
Average Life

(in years)

       Impact of Adverse Change
on Fair Value
  

OAS

  Spread  

    Impact of
Adverse Change
on Fair Value
    Fair     

Weighted-
Average Life

(in years)

       Impact of Adverse Change
on Fair Value
  

OAS

    Spread    

(bps)

    Impact of
Adverse Change
on Fair Value
 
($ in millions)(a) Rate   Rate    10% 20% 50%   (bps)   10% 20%  Rate Value   Rate   10%       20%   50% 10% 20% 

Residential mortgage loans:

  

Servicing rights

 Fixed      $    830   5.9      11.5 %   $ (37)  (71)  (161)    530   $(17)  (33)    Fixed      $    944   6.5           9.5   $     (37)  (71)  (164)    543        $ (19)  (37) 

Servicing rights

 Adjustable  19  3.3      24.8      (1)  (2)  (5)    773   -    (1)    Adjustable  15  3.4           23.6   (1)  (2)  (4)    817       -    (1) 
(a)

The impact of the weighted-average default rate on the current fair value of residual cash flows for all scenarios is immaterial.

These sensitivities are hypothetical and should be used with caution. As the figures indicate, changes in fair value based on these variations in the assumptions typically cannot be extrapolated because the relationship of the change in assumption to the change in fair value may not be linear. The Bancorp believes variations of these levels are reasonably possible; however, there is the potential that adverse changes in key assumptions could be even greater. Also, in the previous table, the effect of a variation in a particular assumption on the fair value of the interests that continue to be held by the Bancorp is calculated without changing any other assumption; in reality, changes in one factor may result in changes in another (for example, increases in market interest rates may result in lower prepayments), which might magnify or counteract these sensitivities.

Fifth Third Bancorp and Subsidiaries

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)

 

 

12.11. Derivative Financial Instruments

The Bancorp maintains an overall risk management strategy that incorporates the use of derivative instruments to reduce certain risks related to interest rate, prepayment and foreign currency volatility. Additionally, the Bancorp holds derivative instruments for the benefit of its commercial customers and for other business purposes. The Bancorp does not enter into unhedged speculative derivative positions.

The Bancorp’s interest rate risk management strategy involves modifying the repricing characteristics of certain financial instruments so that changes in interest rates do not adversely affect the Bancorp’s net interest margin and cash flows. Derivative instruments that the Bancorp may use as part of its interest rate risk management strategy include interest rate swaps, interest rate floors, interest rate caps, forward contracts, forward starting interest rate swaps, options, swaptions and swaptions.TBA securities. Interest rate swap contracts are exchanges of interest payments, such as fixed-rate payments for floating-rate payments, based on a stated notional amount and maturity date. Interest rate floors protect against declining rates, while interest rate caps protect against rising interest rates. Forward contracts are contracts in which the buyer agrees to purchase, and the seller agrees to make delivery of, a specific financial instrument at a predetermined price or yield. Options provide the purchaser with the right, but not the obligation, to purchase or sell a contracted item during a specified period at an agreed upon price. Swaptions are financial instruments granting the owner the right, but not the obligation, to enter into or cancel a swap.

Prepayment volatility arises mostly from changes in fair value of the largely fixed-rate MSR portfolio, mortgage loans and mortgage-backed securities. The Bancorp may enter into various free-standing derivatives (principal-only swaps, interest rate swaptions, interest rate floors, mortgage options, TBAs and interest rate swaps) to economically hedge prepayment volatility. Principal-only swaps are total return swaps based on changes in the value of the underlying mortgage principal-only trust. TBAsTBA securities are a forward purchase agreement for a mortgage-backed securities trade whereby the terms of the security are undefined at the time the trade is made.

Foreign currency volatility occurs as the Bancorp enters into certain loans denominated in foreign currencies. Derivative instruments that the Bancorp may use to economically hedge these foreign denominated loans include foreign exchange swaps and forward contracts.

The Bancorp also enters into derivative contracts (including foreign exchange contracts, commodity contracts and interest rate contracts) for the benefit of commercial customers and other business purposes. The Bancorp economically hedges significant exposures related to these free-standing derivatives by entering into offsetting third-party contracts with approved, reputable and independent counterparties with substantially matching terms and currencies. Credit risk arises from the possible inability of counterparties to meet the terms of their contracts. The Bancorp’s exposure is limited to the replacement value of the contracts rather than the notional, principal or contract amounts. Credit risk is minimized through credit approvals, limits, counterparty collateral and monitoring procedures.

The Bancorp’s derivative assets include certain contractual features in which the Bancorp requires the counterparties to provide collateral in the form of cash and securities to offset changes in the fair value of the derivatives, including changes in the fair value due to credit risk of the counterparty. As of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, the balance of collateral held by the Bancorp for derivative assets was $432 million and $444 million, respectively. For derivative contracts cleared through certain central clearing parties who have modified their rules to treat variation margin payments as settlement of the derivative contract, the payments for variation margin of $35 million were applied to reduce the respective derivative contracts and were also not included in the total amount of collateral held as of June 30, 2017. The credit component negatively impacting the fair value of derivative assets associated with customer accommodation contracts as of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 was $5 million and $6 million, respectively.

In measuring the fair value of derivative liabilities, the Bancorp considers its own credit risk, taking into consideration collateral maintenance requirements of certain derivative counterparties and the duration of instruments with counterparties that do not require collateral maintenance. When necessary, the Bancorp posts collateral primarily in the form of cash and securities to offset changes in fair value of the derivatives, including changes in fair value due to the Bancorp’s credit risk. As of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, the balance of collateral posted by the Bancorp for derivative liabilities was $403 million and $399 million, respectively, and $87 million of variation margin payments were applied to the respective derivative contracts to reduce the Bancorp’s derivative liabilities as of June 30, 2017 and were also not included in the total amount of collateral posted. Certain of the Bancorp’s derivative liabilities contain credit-risk related contingent features that could result in the requirement to post additional collateral upon the occurrence of specified events. As of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, the fair value of the additional collateral that could be required to be posted as a result of the credit-risk related contingent features being triggered was immaterial to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.The posting of collateral has been determined to remove the need for further consideration of credit risk. As a result, the Bancorp determined that the impact of the Bancorp’s credit risk to the valuation of its derivative liabilities was immaterial to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

The Bancorp holds certain derivative instruments that qualify for hedge accounting treatment and are designated as either fair value hedges or cash flow hedges. Derivative instruments that do not qualify for hedge accounting treatment, or for which hedge accounting is not established, are held as free-standing derivatives. All customer accommodation derivatives are held as free-standing derivatives.

The fair value of derivative instruments is presented on a gross basis, even when the derivative instruments are subject to master netting arrangements. Derivative instruments with a positive fair value are reported in other assets in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets while derivative instruments with a negative fair value are reported in other liabilities in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. Cash collateral payables and receivables associated with the derivative instruments are not added to or netted against the fair value amounts with the exception of certain variation margin payments that are considered legal settlements of the derivative contracts. For derivative contracts cleared through certain central clearing parties who have modified their rules to treat variation margin payments as settlements, the variation margin payments are applied to net the fair value of the respective derivative contracts.

The Bancorp’s derivative assets include certain contractual features in which the Bancorp requires the counterparties to provide collateral in the form of cash and securities to offset changes in the fair value of the derivatives, including changes in the fair value due to credit risk of the counterparty. As of June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, the balance of collateral held by the Bancorp for derivative assets was $367 million and $409 million, respectively. For derivative contracts cleared through certain central clearing parties who have modified their rules to treat variation margin payments as settlement of the derivative contract, the payments for variation margin of $99 million were applied to reduce the respective derivative contracts and were also not included in the total amount of collateral held as of June 30, 2018. The credit component negatively impacting the fair value of derivative assets associated with customer accommodation contracts as of both June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017 was $3 million.

In measuring the fair value of derivative liabilities, the Bancorp considers its own credit risk, taking into consideration collateral maintenance requirements of certain derivative counterparties and the duration of instruments with counterparties that do not require collateral maintenance. When necessary, the Bancorp posts collateral primarily in the form of cash and securities to offset changes in fair value of the derivatives, including changes in fair value due to the Bancorp’s credit risk. As of June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, the balance of collateral posted by the Bancorp for derivative liabilities was $401 million and $365 million, respectively, and $130 million of variation margin payments were applied to the respective derivative contracts to reduce the Bancorp’s derivative liabilities as of June 30, 2018 and were also not included in the total amount of collateral posted. Certain of the Bancorp’s derivative liabilities contain credit risk related contingent features that could result in the requirement to post additional collateral upon the occurrence of specified events. As of June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, the fair value of the additional collateral that could be required to be posted as a result of the credit risk related contingent features being triggered was immaterial to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.The posting of collateral has been determined to remove the need for further consideration of credit risk. As a result, the Bancorp determined that the impact of the Bancorp’s credit risk to the valuation of its derivative liabilities was immaterial to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

The Bancorp holds certain derivative instruments that qualify for hedge accounting treatment and are designated as either fair value hedges or cash flow hedges. Derivative instruments that do not qualify for hedge accounting treatment, or for which hedge accounting is not established, are held as free-standing derivatives. All customer accommodation derivatives are held as free-standing derivatives.

Fifth Third Bancorp and Subsidiaries

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)

 

 

The following tables reflect the notional amounts and fair values for all derivative instruments included in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of:

 

        Fair Value         Fair Value 
June 30, 2017 ($ in millions) Notional    
Amount    
    Derivative
Assets
 Derivative 
Liabilities 
 
June 30, 2018 ($ in millions) 

Notional    

Amount    

    Derivative
Assets
 Derivative   
Liabilities   
 

Derivatives Designated as Qualifying Hedging Instruments:

        

Fair value hedges:

        

Interest rate swaps related to long-term debt

 $                2,955   317   5  $                3,205   229   4 

Total fair value hedges

  317   5   229   4 

Cash flow hedges:

        

Interest rate swaps related to C&I loans

  4,475   -   13   6,150   1   15 

Total cash flow hedges

  -   13   1   15 

Total derivatives designated as qualifying hedging instruments

  317   18   230   19 

Derivatives Not Designated as Qualifying Hedging Instruments:

        

Free-standing derivatives - risk management and other business purposes:

        

Interest rate contracts related to MSR portfolio

  11,602    59   18   11,475    52   13 

Forward contracts related to residential mortgage loans held for sale

  1,749    3   3   1,450    -   4 

Swap associated with the sale of Visa, Inc. Class B Shares

  1,563    -   98   2,207    -   164 

Foreign exchange contracts

  194   -   5   153   2   - 

Total free-standing derivatives - risk management and other business purposes

  62   124   54   181 

Free-standing derivatives - customer accommodation:

        

Interest rate contracts for customers

  39,933    179           130 

Interest rate contracts

  48,949    247           280 

Interest rate lock commitments

  769    14   -   596    11   - 

Commodity contracts

  2,382    90   91   5,087    284   270 

TBAs

  56    -   - 

TBA securities

  58    -   - 

Foreign exchange contracts

  10,653   118   128   10,842   119   109 

Total free-standing derivatives - customer accommodation

  401   349   661   659 

Total derivatives not designated as qualifying hedging instruments

  463   473   715   840 

Total

 $               780   491  $            945   859 
        
        Fair Value         Fair Value 
December 31, 2016 ($ in millions) Notional    
Amount    
    Derivative
Assets
 Derivative 
Liabilities 
 
December 31, 2017 ($ in millions) 

Notional    

Amount    

    Derivative
Assets
 Derivative   
Liabilities   
 

Derivatives Designated as Qualifying Hedging Instruments:

        

Fair value hedges:

        

Interest rate swaps related to long-term debt

 $3,455  323  12  $3,705  297  5 

Total fair value hedges

 323  12  297  5 

Cash flow hedges:

        

Interest rate swaps related to C&I loans

 4,475  22   -  4,475   -  12 

Total cash flow hedges

 22   -   -  12 

Total derivatives designated as qualifying hedging instruments

 345  12  297  17 

Derivatives Not Designated as Qualifying Hedging Instruments:

        

Free-standing derivatives - risk management and other business purposes:

        

Interest rate contracts related to MSR portfolio

 10,522   165  39  11,035   54  15 

Forward contracts related to residential mortgage loans held for sale

 1,823   20  3  1,284   1  1 

Stock warrant

 20   20   - 

Swap associated with the sale of Visa, Inc. Class B Shares

 1,300    -  91  1,900    -  137 

Foreign exchange contracts

 111   -   -  112   -  1 

Total free-standing derivatives - risk management and other business purposes

 185  133  75  154 

Free-standing derivatives - customer accommodation:

        

Interest rate contracts for customers

 33,431   205  210 

Interest rate contracts

 42,216   154  145 

Interest rate lock commitments

 701   13  1  446   8   - 

Commodity contracts

 2,095   107  106  4,125   165  167 

TBA securities

 26    -   - 

Foreign exchange contracts

 11,013  202  204  12,654  124  119 

Total free-standing derivatives - customer accommodation

 527  521  451  431 

Total derivatives not designated as qualifying hedging instruments

 712  654  526  585 

Total

 $  1,057  666  $823  602 

Fifth Third Bancorp and Subsidiaries

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)

 

 

Fair Value Hedges

The Bancorp may enter into interest rate swaps to convert its fixed-rate funding to floating-rate. Decisions to convert fixed-rate funding to floating are made primarily through consideration of the asset/liability mix of the Bancorp, the desired asset/liability sensitivity and interest rate levels. For all designated fair value hedges of interest rate swapsrisk as of June 30, 2017,2018, the Bancorp performed an assessment of hedge effectiveness using regression analysis was performed and such swaps were accounted for using the “long-haul” method. The long-haul method requires a quarterly assessment of hedge effectiveness and measurement of ineffectiveness. For interest rate swaps accounted for as a fair value hedge using the long-haul method, ineffectiveness is the difference between the(quantitative approach) with changes in the fair value of the interest rate swapderivative instrument and changes in the fair value of the related hedged itemasset or liability attributable to the hedged risk being hedged. The ineffectiveness on interest rate swaps hedging fixed-rate funding is reported within interest expenserecorded in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income.same income statement line in current period net income.

The following table reflects the change in fair value of interest rate contracts, designated as fair value hedges, as well as the change in fair value of the related hedged items attributable to the risk being hedged, included in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income:

 

 

Condensed Consolidated

Statements of Income Caption

    

For the three months

ended June 30,

      For the six months 
ended June 30, 
  Condensed Consolidated    For the three months
ended June 30,
      For the six months  
ended June 30,  
 
($ in millions) 2017   2016      2017 2016        Statements of Income Caption 2018   2017      2018 2017       

Change in fair value of interest rate swaps hedging long-term debt

 Interest on long-term debt   $  14    39      (6)    122        Interest on long-term debt   $  (18)   14      (81 (6)      

Change in fair value of hedged long-term debt attributable to the risk being hedged

 Interest on long-term debt  (15)   (41)    5  (126)       Interest on long-term debt  19    (15)    83  5       

The following amounts were recorded in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets related to cumulative basis adjustments for fair value hedges as of:

($ in millions)

    Condensed Consolidated  

    Balance Sheets Caption  

June 30, 2018

Carrying amount of the hedged item

Long-term debt                $                  3,701          

Cumulative amount of fair value hedging adjustments included in the carrying
amount of the hedged items

Long-term debt                (212)         

Cash Flow Hedges

The Bancorp may enter into interest rate swaps to convert floating-rate assets and liabilities to fixed rates or to hedge certain forecasted transactions.transactions for the variability in cash flows attributable to the contractually specified interest rate. The assets or liabilities may be grouped in circumstances where they share the same risk exposure that the Bancorp desires to hedge. The Bancorp may also enter into interest rate caps and floors to limit cash flow variability of floating-rate assets and liabilities. As of June 30, 2017,2018, all hedges designated as cash flow hedges were assessed for effectiveness using regression analysis. Ineffectiveness is generally measured as the amount by which the cumulativeThe entire change in the fair value of the hedging instrument exceeds the present value of the cumulative changeinterest rate swap included in the hedged item’s expected cash flows attributable to the risk being hedged. Ineffectivenessassessment of hedge effectiveness is reported within other noninterest incomerecorded in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income. The effective portion of the cumulative gains or losses on cash flow hedges are reported within AOCI and are reclassified from AOCI to current period earnings when the forecasted transactionhedged item affects earnings. As of June 30, 2017,2018, the maximum length of time over which the Bancorp is hedging its exposure to the variability in future cash flows is 3073 months.

Reclassified gains and losses on interest rate contracts related to commercial and industrial loans are recorded within interest income in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income. As of June 30, 20172018 and December 31, 2016, $32017, $16 million and $10$9 million, respectively, of net deferred gains,losses, net of tax, on cash flow hedges were recorded in AOCI in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. As of June 30, 2017, $42018, $7 million in net deferredunrealized gains, net of tax, recorded in AOCI are expected to be reclassified into earnings during the next twelve months. This amount could differ from amounts actually recognized due to changes in interest rates, hedgede-designations, and the addition of other hedges subsequent to June 30, 2017.2018.

During both the three and six months ended June 30, 20172018 and 2016,2017, there were no gains or losses reclassified from AOCI into earnings associated with the discontinuance of cash flow hedges because it was probable that the original forecasted transaction would no longer occur by the end of the originally specified time period or within the additional period of time as defined by U.S. GAAP.

The following table presents the pretax net gains (losses) recorded in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income and in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income relating to derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedges:

 

     For the three months ended
June 30,    
      For the six months ended
June 30,    
      For the three months ended
June 30,    
      For the six months ended
June 30,    
 
($ in millions)              2017             2016                          2017             2016                           2018             2017(a)                       2018             2017(a)         

Amount of pretax net gains recognized in OCI

   $   8      26            3  100         

Amount of pretax net (losses) gains recognized in OCI

   $        4     8          (5)     3       

Amount of pretax net gains reclassified from OCI into net income

  6      12           14  26               -     6         1      14       
(a)

For both the three and six months ended June 30, 2017, the amount of pretax net losses recognized in OCI represented the effective portion of the cumulative gains or losses on cash flow hedges and ineffectiveness was reported within noninterest income. Upon the adoption of ASU2017-12, the Bancorp recorded a cumulative effect adjustment to retained earnings effective January 1, 2018 related to the elimination of the separate measurement of ineffectiveness. Refer to Note 3 for additional information.

Free-Standing Derivative Instruments – Risk Management and Other Business Purposes

As part of its overall risk management strategy relative to its mortgage banking activity, the Bancorp may enter into various free-standing derivatives (principal-only swaps, interest rate swaptions, interest rate floors, mortgage options, TBAsTBA securities and interest rate swaps) to economically hedge changes in fair value of its largely fixed-rate MSR portfolio. Principal-only swaps hedge the mortgage-LIBOR spread because these swaps appreciate in value as a result of tightening spreads. Principal-only swaps also provide prepayment protection by increasing in value when prepayment speeds increase, as opposed to MSRs that lose value in a faster prepayment environment. Receive fixed/pay floating interest rate swaps and swaptions increase in value when interest rates do not increase as quickly as expected.

Fifth Third Bancorp and Subsidiaries

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)

The Bancorp enters into forward contracts and mortgage options to economically hedge the change in fair value of certain residential mortgage loans held for sale due to changes in interest rates. IRLCs issued on residential mortgage loan commitments that will be held for sale are also considered free-standing derivative instruments and the interest rate exposure on these commitments is economically hedged primarily with forward contracts. Revaluation gains and losses from free-standing derivatives related to mortgage banking activity are recorded as a component of mortgage banking net revenue in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income.

Fifth Third Bancorp and Subsidiaries

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)

In conjunction with the initial sale of the Bancorp’s 51% interest in Vantiv Holding, LLC, the Bancorp received a warrant which was accounted for as a free-standing derivative. Refer to Note 21 for further discussion of significant inputs and assumptions previously used in the valuation of the warrant. During the year ended December 31, 2015, the Bancorp both sold and exercised part of the warrant. During the year ended December 31, 2016, the Bancorp exercised the remaining portion of the warrant.

In conjunction with the sale of Visa, Inc. Class B Shares in 2009, the Bancorp entered into a total return swap in which the Bancorp will make or receive payments based on subsequent changes in the conversion rate of the Class B Shares into Class A Shares. This total return swap is accounted for as a free-standing derivative. Refer to Note 21 for further discussion of significant inputs and assumptions used in the valuation of this instrument.

The net gains (losses) recorded in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income relating to free-standing derivative instruments used for risk management and other business purposes are summarized in the following table:

 

 

Condensed Consolidated

Statements of Income Caption

      For the three months   For the six months  

Condensed Consolidated

Statements of Income Caption

      For the three months   For the six months 
     ended June 30,    ended June 30,      ended June 30,    ended June 30, 
($ in millions)      2017  2016     2017  2016         2018    2017     2018    2017   

Interest rate contracts:

                    

Forward contracts related to residential mortgage loans held for sale

 Mortgage banking net revenue $    5  (9)       (16 (19)    Mortgage banking net revenue $     (3)      5        (4)    (16)   

Interest rate contracts related to MSR portfolio

 Mortgage banking net revenue    16  51     15  149  Mortgage banking net revenue    (16)      16        (65)    15    

Foreign exchange contracts:

                    

Foreign exchange contracts for risk management purposes

 Other noninterest income    (3 (1)       (4 (4)    Other noninterest income    3       (3)           (4)   

Equity contracts:

                    

Stock warrant associated with Vantiv Holding, LLC

 Other noninterest income    -  19     -  66 

Swap associated with sale of Visa, Inc. Class B Shares

 Other noninterest income    (9 (50)       (22 (50)    Other noninterest income    (10)      (9)       (49)    (22)   

Free-Standing Derivative Instruments – Customer Accommodation

The majority of the free-standing derivative instruments the Bancorp enters into are for the benefit of its commercial customers. These derivative contracts are not designated against specific assets or liabilities on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets or to forecasted transactions; and therefore, do not qualify for hedge accounting. These instruments include foreign exchange derivative contracts entered into for the benefit of commercial customers involved in international trade to hedge their exposure to foreign currency fluctuations and commodity contracts to hedge such items as natural gas and various other derivative contracts. The Bancorp may economically hedge significant exposures related to these derivative contracts entered into for the benefit of customers by entering into offsetting contracts with approved, reputable, independent counterparties with substantially matching terms. The Bancorp hedges its interest rate exposure on commercial customer transactions by executing offsetting swap agreements with primary dealers. Revaluation gains and losses on interest rate, foreign exchange, commodity and other commercial customer derivative contracts are recorded as a component of either corporate banking revenue or other noninterest income in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income.

The Bancorp enters into risk participation agreements, under which the Bancorp assumes credit exposure relating to certain underlying interest rate derivative contracts. The Bancorp only enters into these risk participation agreements in instances in which the Bancorp has participated in the loan that the underlying interest rate derivative contract was designed to hedge. The Bancorp will make payments under these agreements if a customer defaults on its obligation to perform under the terms of the underlying interest rate derivative contract. As of June 30, 20172018 and December 31, 2016,2017, the total notional amount of the risk participation agreements was $2.6$3.7 billion and $2.5$2.8 billion, respectively, and the fair value was a liability of $5$8 million and $4$5 million at June 30, 20172018 and December 31, 2016,2017, respectively, which is included in other liabilities in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. As of June 30, 2017,2018, the risk participation agreements had a weighted-average remaining life of 2.93.6 years.

The Bancorp’s maximum exposure in the risk participation agreements is contingent on the fair value of the underlying interest rate derivative contracts in an asset position at the time of default. The Bancorp monitors the credit risk associated with the underlying customers in the risk participation agreements through the same risk grading system currently utilized for establishing loss reserves in its loan and lease portfolio.

Risk ratings of the notional amount of risk participation agreements under this risk rating system are summarized in the following table as of:

 

($ in millions)        June 30,
      2017
   December 31,
2016
        June 30,
      2018
 December 31,
2017
 

Pass

  $2,582    2,447      $3,590  2,748     

Special mention

   30    14       77  66     

Substandard

   9    6       10  24     

Total

  $            2,621    2,467      $            3,677  2,838     

Fifth Third Bancorp and Subsidiaries

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)

 

 

The net gains (losses) recorded in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income relating to free-standing derivative instruments used for customer accommodation are summarized in the following table:

 

         For the three months   For the six months       For the three months    For the six months 
 Condensed Consolidated     ended June 30,    ended June 30,   Condensed Consolidated    ended June 30,   ended June 30, 
($ in millions) Statements of Income Caption      2017   2016   2017   2016   Statements of Income Caption        2018         2017                  2018         2017     

Interest rate contracts:

                   

Interest rate contracts for customers (contract revenue)

 Corporate banking revenue $    5    5        9    12      Corporate banking revenue $    9  5       16  9    

Interest rate contracts for customers (credit portion of fair value adjustment)

 Other noninterest expense    -    (1)       -    (2)   

Interest rate lock commitments

 Mortgage banking net revenue      26    42        48    84      Mortgage banking net revenue     22  26       35  48    

Commodity contracts:

                   

Commodity contracts for customers (contract revenue)

 Corporate banking revenue    1    2        2    3      Corporate banking revenue   2  1       4  2    

Commodity contracts for customers (credit losses)

 Other noninterest expense    1    (1)       1    (1)     Other noninterest expense   -  1       -  1    

Commodity contracts for customers (credit portion of fair value adjustment)

 Other noninterest expense    -    2        -    1      Other noninterest expense   (1  -       (1  -    

Foreign exchange contracts:

                   

Foreign exchange contracts for customers (contract revenue)

 Corporate banking revenue    9    16        22    32      Corporate banking revenue   13  9       27  22    

Foreign exchange contracts for customers (contract revenue)

  Other noninterest income   7   -       5   -    

Foreign exchange contracts for customers (credit losses)

 Other noninterest expense    2    (2)       2    (2)     Other noninterest expense   -  2       -  2    

Foreign exchange contracts for customers (credit portion of fair value adjustment)

 Other noninterest expense    -    2        1    -      Other noninterest expense  -   -      1  1    

Offsetting Derivative Financial Instruments

The Bancorp’s derivative transactions are generally governed by ISDA Master Agreements and similar arrangements, which include provisions governing the setoff of assets and liabilities between the parties. When the Bancorp has more than one outstanding derivative transaction with a single counterparty, the setoff provisions contained within these agreements generally allow thenon-defaulting party the right to reduce its liability to the defaulting party by amounts eligible for setoff, including the collateral received as well as eligible offsetting transactions with that counterparty, irrespective of the currency, place of payment, or booking office. The Bancorp’s policy is to present its derivative assets and derivative liabilities on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets on a gross basis, even when provisions allowing for setoff are in place. However, for derivative contracts cleared through certain central clearing parties who have modified their rules to treat variation margin payments as settlements, the fair value of the respective derivative contracts are reported net of the variation margin payments.

Collateral amounts included in the tables below consist primarily of cash and highly-rated government-backed securities and as of June 30, 2017 do not include variation margin payments for derivative contracts with legal rights of setoff.setoff for both periods shown.

The following tables provide a summary of offsetting derivative financial instruments:

 

  Gross Amount      Gross Amounts Not Offset in the      Gross Amount      Gross Amounts Not Offset in the    
  Recognized in the          Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets          Recognized in the          Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets        
As of June 30, 2017 ($ in millions)  Condensed Consolidated
Balance Sheets(a)
      Derivatives Collateral(b) Net Amount   
As of June 30, 2018 ($ in millions)  Condensed Consolidated
Balance Sheets(a)
      Derivatives Collateral(b) Net Amount   

Assets:

              

Derivatives

  $766       (194)      (365)      207    $934       (258)      (300)     376  

Total assets

   766       (194)      (365)      207     934       (258)      (300)     376  

Liabilities:

              

Derivatives

   491       (194)      (144)      153     859       (258)      (234)     367  

Total liabilities

  $491       (194)      (144)      153    $859       (258)      (234)     367  

(a) Amount does not include IRLCs because these instruments are not subject to master netting or similar arrangements.

(b) Amount of collateral received as an offset to asset positions or pledged as an offset to liability positions. Collateral values in excess of related derivative amounts recognized in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets were excluded from this table.

(a) Amount does not include IRLCs because these instruments are not subject to master netting or similar arrangements.

(b) Amount of collateral received as an offset to asset positions or pledged as an offset to liability positions. Collateral values in excess of related derivative amounts recognized in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets were excluded from this table.

    

    

  Gross Amount      Gross Amounts Not Offset in the    
  Recognized in the          Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets        
As of December 31, 2017 ($ in millions)  Condensed Consolidated
Balance Sheets(a)
      Derivatives Collateral(b) Net Amount   

Assets:

       

Derivatives

  $815      (213)     (362)    240  

Total assets

   815      (213)     (362)    240  

Liabilities:

       

Derivatives

   602      (213)     (155)    234  

Total liabilities

  $602      (213)     (155)    234  
(a)

Amount does not include IRLCs because these instruments are not subject to master netting or similar arrangements.

(b)

Amount of collateral received as an offset to asset positions or pledged as an offset to liability positions. Collateral values in excess of related derivative amounts recognized in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets were excluded from this table.

    Gross Amount       Gross Amounts Not Offset in the     
   Recognized in the          Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets        
As of December 31, 2016 ($ in millions)  Condensed Consolidated
Balance Sheets(a)
       Derivatives  Collateral(b)  Net Amount   

Assets:

       

Derivatives

  $1,044          (374)      (377)     293  

Total assets

   1,044       (374)      (377)     293  

Liabilities:

       

Derivatives

   665          (374)      (125)     166  

Total liabilities

  $665          (374)      (125)     166  
(a)

Amount does not include IRLCs because these instruments are not subject to master netting or similar arrangements.

(b)

Amount of collateral received as an offset to asset positions or pledged as an offset to liability positions. Collateral values in excess of related derivative amounts recognized in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets were excluded from this table.

Fifth Third Bancorp and Subsidiaries

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)

 

 

13.12. Other Short-Term Borrowings

Borrowings with original maturities of one year or less are classified as short-term. The following table presents a summary of the Bancorp’s other short-term borrowings as of:

 

($ in millions)    June 30,      
2017      
   December 31,      
2016      
     June 30,      
2018       
   December 31,        
2017          
 

FHLB advances

 $   4,350    2,500      $    1,200    3,125     

Securities sold under repurchase agreements

   656    661        300    546     

Derivative collateral

   381    374       263    341     

Other

  2    -     

Total other short-term borrowings

 $   5,389    3,535      $    1,763    4,012     

The Bancorp’s securities sold under repurchase agreements are accounted for as secured borrowings and are collateralized by securities included inavailable-for-sale debt and other securities in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. These securities are subject to changes in market value and, therefore, the Bancorp may increase or decrease the level of securities pledged as collateral based upon these movements in market value.

The following table summarizes the Bancorp’s As of both June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, all securities sold under repurchase agreements were secured by the type of collateral securing the borrowing andagency residential mortgage-backed securities with an overnight remaining contractual maturity as of:maturity.

($ in millions)     June 30, 2017     December 31, 2016 
       Amount  Remaining Contractual
Maturity
             Amount      Remaining Contractual    
Maturity    
 

Type of collateral:

        

Agency residential mortgage-backed securities

  $   656   Overnight      661   Overnight     

U.S. Treasury and federal agencies securities

      -   Overnight      -   Overnight     

Total securities sold under repurchase agreements

  $   656          661     

14.13. Long-Term Debt

On June 15, 2017,March 14, 2018, the Bancorp issued and sold $700$650 million of 2.60%3.95% senior fixed-rate notes, with a maturity of fiveten years, due on June 15, 2022.March 14, 2028. These notes will be redeemable by the Bancorp, in whole or in part, on or after the date that is 30 days prior to the maturity date at a redemption price equal to 100% of the principal amount of the notes to be redeemed plus accrued and unpaid interest thereon to, but excluding, the redemption date.

15.On June 5, 2018, the Bancorp issued and sold $250 million of senior floating-rate notes, with a maturity of three years, due on June 4, 2021. Interest on the floating-rate notes is3-month LIBOR plus 47 bps. These notes will be redeemable, in whole or in part, on or after the date that is 30 days prior to the maturity date at a redemption price equal to 100% of the principal amount of the notes to be redeemed plus accrued and unpaid interest thereon to, but excluding, the redemption date.

For further information on a subsequent event related to long-term debt, refer to Note 24.

14. Capital Actions

Accelerated Share Repurchase Transactions

During the six months ended June 30, 2017,2018, the Bancorp entered into or settled accelerated share repurchase transactions. As part of these transactions, the Bancorp entered into forward contracts in which the final number of shares delivered at settlement was based generally on a discount to the average daily volume weighted-average price of the Bancorp’s common stock during the term of these repurchase agreements. The accelerated share repurchases were treated as two separate transactions, (i) the acquisition of treasury shares on the repurchase date and (ii) a forward contract indexed to the Bancorp’s common stock.

The following table presents a summary of the Bancorp’s accelerated share repurchase transactions that were entered into or settled during the six months ended June 30, 2017:2018:

 

Repurchase Date     

Amount    

($ in millions)    

  Shares Repurchased on  
Repurchase Date  
  

Shares Received    

from Forward    

Contract Settlement    

  Total Shares    
Repurchased    
  Settlement Date       

December 20, 2016

 $   155   4,843,750   1,044,362   5,888,112   February 6, 2017 

May 1, 2017

      342   11,641,971   2,248,250   13,890,221   July 31, 2017 
Repurchase Date     

Amount    

($ in millions)    

  Shares Repurchased on  
Repurchase Date  
  

Shares Received    

from Forward    

Contract Settlement    

  Total Shares    
Repurchased    
  Settlement Date     

December 19, 2017

 $    273   7,727,273   824,367   8,551,640   March 19, 2018 

February 12, 2018

   318   8,691,318   1,015,731   9,707,049   March 26, 2018 

May 25, 2018

      235   6,402,244   1,172,122   7,574,366   June 15, 2018 

For further information on a subsequent event related to capital actions, refer to Note 24.

Fifth Third Bancorp and Subsidiaries

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)

 

 

16.15. Commitments, Contingent Liabilities and Guarantees

The Bancorp, in the normal course of business, enters into financial instruments and various agreements to meet the financing needs of its customers. The Bancorp also enters into certain transactions and agreements to manage its interest rate and prepayment risks, provide funding, equipment and locations for its operations and invest in its communities. These instruments and agreements involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit risk, counterparty risk and market risk in excess of the amounts recognized in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. The creditworthiness of counterparties for all instruments and agreements is evaluated on acase-by-case basis in accordance with the Bancorp’s credit policies. The Bancorp’s significant commitments, contingent liabilities and guarantees in excess of the amounts recognized in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets are discussed in the following sections.

Commitments

The Bancorp has certain commitments to make future payments under contracts. The following table reflects a summary of significant commitments as of:

 

    June 30,       December 31,       June 30,       December 31,   
($ in millions)    2017       2016       2018       2017   

Commitments to extend credit

  $   67,242    67,909   $   70,915    68,106 

Letters of credit

   2,358    2,583    2,092    2,185 

Forward contracts related to residential mortgage loans held for sale

   1,749    1,823    1,450    1,284 

Noncancelable operating lease obligations

   556    576    568    568 

Purchase obligations

   110    57    120    144 

Capital commitments for private equity investments

   58    59    43    48 

Capital expenditures

   42    29    27    37 

Capital lease obligations

  17    19   23    26 

Commitments to extend credit

Commitments to extend credit are agreements to lend, typically having fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses that may require payment of a fee. Since many of the commitments to extend credit may expire without being drawn upon, the total commitment amounts do not necessarily represent future cash flow requirements. The Bancorp is exposed to credit risk in the event of nonperformance by the counterparty for the amount of the contract. Fixed-rate commitments are also subject to market risk resulting from fluctuations in interest rates and the Bancorp’s exposure is limited to the replacement value of those commitments. As of June 30, 20172018 and December 31, 2016,2017, the Bancorp had a reserve for unfunded commitments, including letters of credit, totaling $162$131 million and $161 million, respectively, included in other liabilities in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. The Bancorp monitors the credit risk associated with commitments to extend credit using the same standard regulatory risk rating system utilized withinfor its loan and lease portfolio.

Risk ratings under this risk rating system are summarized in the following table as of:

 

    June 30,       December 31,          June 30,       December 31,      
($ in millions)    2017       2016          2018       2017      

Pass

  $   66,256    66,802   $   70,340    67,254     

Special mention

   399    338    306    330     

Substandard

   587    753   269    522     

Doubtful

  -    16 

Total commitments to extend credit

  $   67,242    67,909   $   70,915    68,106     

Letters of credit

Standby and commercial letters of credit are conditional commitments issued to guarantee the performance of a customer to a third party and expire as summarized in the following table as of June 30, 2017:2018:

 

($ in millions)          

Less than 1 year(a)

  $                          1,208   $                          1,070 

1 - 5 years(a)

   1,120    1,009 

Over 5 years

   30    13 

Total letters of credit

  $2,358   $2,092 
(a)

Includes $11$7 and $3$2 issued on behalf of commercial customers to facilitate trade payments in U.S. dollars and foreign currencies which expire less than 1 year and between 1 - 5 years, respectively.

Standby letters of credit accounted for approximately 99% of total letters of credit at both June 30, 20172018 and December 31, 2016,2017, and are considered guarantees in accordance with U.S. GAAP. Approximately 62%63% and 61% of the total standby letters of credit were collateralized as of both June 30, 20172018 and December 31, 2016.2017, respectively. In the event of nonperformance by the customers, the Bancorp has rights to the underlying collateral, which can include commercial real estate, physical plant and property, inventory, receivables, cash and marketable securities. The reserve related to these standby letters of credit, which was included in the total reserve for unfunded commitments, was $3$5 million and $6 million at both June 30, 20172018 and December 31, 2016.2017, respectively. The Bancorp monitors the credit risk associated with letters of credit using the same standard regulatory risk rating system utilized withinfor its loan and lease portfolio.

Fifth Third Bancorp and Subsidiaries

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)

 

 

Risk ratings under this risk rating system are summarized in the following table as of:

 

($ in millions)    June 30,    
2017    
   December 31, 
2016 
     

June 30,    

2018    

   

December 31,  

2017  

 

Pass

 $   2,030    2,134  $    1,897    1,830  

Special mention

   80    98    46    67  

Substandard

   184    290    149    218  

Doubtful

  64    61   -    70  

Total letters of credit

 $   2,358    2,583  $    2,092    2,185  

At June 30, 20172018 and December 31, 2016,2017, the Bancorp had outstanding letters of credit that were supporting certain securities issued as VRDNs. The Bancorp facilitates financing for its commercial customers, which consist of companies and municipalities, by marketing the VRDNs to investors. The VRDNs pay interest to holders at a rate of interest that fluctuates based upon market demand. The VRDNs generally have long-term maturity dates, but can be tendered by the holder for purchase at par value upon proper advance notice. When the VRDNs are tendered, a remarketing agent generally finds another investor to purchase the VRDNs to keep the securities outstanding in the market. As of June 30, 20172018 and December 31, 2016,2017, total VRDNs in which the Bancorp was the remarketing agent or were supported by a Bancorp letter of credit were $779$560 million and $929$602 million, respectively, of which FTS acted as the remarketing agent to issuers on $657$540 million and $784$508 million, respectively. As remarketing agent, FTS is responsible for finding purchasers foractively remarketing VRDNs that are put by investors.to other investors when they have been tendered. If another investor is not identified, FTS may choose to purchase the VRDNs into inventory at its discretion while it continues to remarket them. If FTS purchases the VRDNs into inventory, it can subsequently tender back the VRDNs to the issuer’s trustee with proper advance notice. The Bancorp issued letters of credit, as a credit enhancement, to $483$299 million and $609$331 million of the VRDNs remarketed by FTS, in addition to $122$20 million and $145$94 million in VRDNs remarketed by third parties at June 30, 20172018 and December 31, 2016,2017, respectively. These letters of credit are included in the total letters of credit balance provided in the previous table. The Bancorp did not hold any of these VRDNs in its portfolio at June 30, 2017held $2 million and held $6$1 million of these VRDNs in its portfolio and classified them as trading securities at June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2016.2017, respectively.

Forward contracts related to residential mortgage loans held for sale

The Bancorp enters into forward contracts to economically hedge the change in fair value of certain residential mortgage loans held for sale due to changes in interest rates. The outstanding notional amounts of these forward contracts are included in the summary of significant commitments table for all periods presented.

Noncancelable operating lease obligations and other commitments

The Bancorp’s subsidiaries have entered into a number of noncancelable lease agreements. The minimum rental commitments under noncancelable lease agreements are shown in the summary of significant commitments table. The Bancorp has also entered into a limited number of agreements for work related to banking center construction and to purchase goods or services.

Contingent Liabilities

Legal claims

There are legal claims pending against the Bancorp and its subsidiaries that have arisen in the normal course of business. Refer to Note 1716 for additional information regarding these proceedings.

Guarantees

The Bancorp has performance obligations upon the occurrence of certain events under financial guarantees provided in certain contractual arrangements as discussed in the following sections.

Residential mortgage loans sold with representation and warranty provisions

Conforming residential mortgage loans sold to unrelated third parties are generally sold with representation and warranty provisions. A contractual liability arises only in the event of a breach of these representations and warranties and, in general, only when a loss results from the breach. The Bancorp may be required to repurchase any previously sold loan, indemnify or make whole the investor or insurer for which the representation or warranty of the Bancorp proves to be inaccurate, incomplete or misleading. For more information on how the Bancorp establishes the residential mortgage repurchase reserve, refer to Note 1 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in the Bancorp’s Annual Report on Form10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016.2017.

As of June 30, 20172018 and December 31, 2016,2017, the Bancorp maintained reserves related to loans sold with representation and warranty provisions totaling $11$7 million and $13$9 million, respectively, included in other liabilities in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets.

The Bancorp uses the best information available when estimating its mortgage representation and warranty reserve; however, the estimation process is inherently uncertain and imprecise and, accordingly, losses in excess of the amounts reserved as of June 30, 20172018 are reasonably possible. The Bancorp currently estimates that it is reasonably possible that it could incur losses related to mortgage representation and warranty provisions in an amount up to approximately $15$9 million in excess of amounts reserved. This estimate was derived by modifying the key assumptions to reflect management’s judgment regarding reasonably possible adverse changes to those assumptions. The actual repurchase losses could vary significantly from the recorded mortgage representation and warranty reserve or this estimate of reasonably possible losses, depending on the outcome of various factors, including those previously discussed.

Fifth Third Bancorp and Subsidiaries

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)

 

 

For both the three months ended June 30, 20172018 and 2016,2017, the Bancorp paid an immaterial amount in the form of make whole payments and repurchased $3$5 million and $2$3 million, respectively, in outstanding principal of loans to satisfy investor demands. For both the six months ended June 30, 20172018 and 2016,2017, the Bancorp paid an immaterial amountamounts in the form of make whole payments and repurchased $5$7 million and $6$5 million, respectively, in outstanding principal of loans to satisfy investor demands. Total repurchase demand requests during the three months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017 and 2016 were $5$6 million and $4$5 million, respectively. Total repurchase demand requests during the six months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017 and 2016 were $8$11 million and $10$8 million, respectively. Total outstanding repurchase demand inventory was $2$3 million and $1 million at both June 30, 20172018 and December 31, 2016.2017, respectively.

The following table summarizes activity in the reserve for representation and warranty provisions:

 

  For the three months ended
June 30,
   For the six months ended
June 30,
   For the three months ended
June 30,
   For the six months ended
June 30,
 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 
($ in millions)  2017   2016               2017           2016                 2018   2017                  2018         2017             

Balance, beginning of period

  $                    12         23     13         25        $                      8         12             13      

Net reductions to the reserve

   (1)    (2)    (2)    (3)        (1)    (1)    (2)    (2)     

Losses charged against the reserve

               (1)     

Balance, end of period

  $11    21     11    21        $    11         11      

The following tables provide a rollforward of unresolved claims by claimant type for the six months ended:

 

   GSE  Private Label 
  

 

 

  

 

 

 
June 30, 2018 ($ in millions)           Units  Dollars          Units    Dollars 

Balance, beginning of period

   6  $              1    1   $              -       

New demands

   62   11    -    -       

Resolved demands

   (54  (9)   -    -       

Balance, end of period

   14  $   1   $-       
           GSE          Private Label       
  

 

 

  

 

 

   GSE Private Label 
June 30, 2017 ($ in millions)           Units  Dollars          Units    Dollars           Units Dollars         Units   Dollars 

Balance, beginning of period

   13  $                2   -   $                -            13  $   -   $-        

New demands

   58   8   -    -            58     -    -        

Loan paydowns/payoffs

   (1  -   -    -            (1     -    -        

Resolved demands

   (54  (8  -    -            (54 (8)   -    -        

Balance, end of period

   16  $2   -   $-            16  $   -   $-        
      
  GSE Private Label 
June 30, 2016 ($ in millions)          Units Dollars         Units   Dollars 

Balance, beginning of period

   16   $     $-         

New demands

   142   10       -         

Loan paydowns/payoffs

   (6)  (1)       -         

Resolved demands

   (134)  (9)  (4)    -         

Balance, end of period

   18   $     $-         

Residential mortgage loans sold with credit recourse

The Bancorp sold certain residential mortgage loans in the secondary market with credit recourse. In the event of any customer default, pursuant to the credit recourse provided, the Bancorp is required to reimburse the third party. The maximum amount of credit risk in the event of nonperformance by the underlying borrowers is equivalent to the total outstanding balance. In the event of nonperformance, the Bancorp has rights to the underlying collateral value securing the loan. The outstanding balances on these loans sold with credit recourse were $344$289 million and $374$312 million at June 30, 20172018 and December 31, 2016,2017, respectively, and the delinquency rates were 2.7%2.5% and 3.2%3.0% at June 30, 20172018 and December 31, 2016,2017, respectively. The Bancorp maintained an estimated credit loss reserve on these loans sold with credit recourse of $6 million and $7$5 million at both June 30, 20172018 and December 31, 2016, respectively,2017 recorded in other liabilities in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. To determine the credit loss reserve, the Bancorp used an approach that is consistent with its overall approach in estimating credit losses for various categories of residential mortgage loans held in its loan portfolio.

Margin accounts

FTS, an indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of the Bancorp, guarantees the collection of all margin account balances held by its brokerage clearing agent for the benefit of its customers. FTS is responsible for payment to its brokerage clearing agent for any loss, liability, damage, cost or expense incurred as a result of customers failing to comply with margin or margin maintenance calls on all margin accounts. The margin account balances held by the brokerage clearing agent were $14 million and $15 million at both June 30, 20172018 and December 31, 2016, respectively.2017. In the event of any customer default, FTS has rights to the underlying collateral provided. Given the existence of the underlying collateral provided and negligible historical credit losses, the Bancorp does not maintain a loss reserve related to the margin accounts.

Long-term borrowing obligations

The Bancorp had certain fully and unconditionally guaranteed long-term borrowing obligations issued by wholly-owned issuing trust entities of $62 million at both June 30, 20172018 and December 31, 2016.2017.

Visa litigation

The Bancorp, as a member bank of Visa prior to Visa’s reorganization and IPO (the “IPO”) of its Class A common shares (the “Class A Shares”) in 2008, had certain indemnification obligations pursuant to Visa’s certificate of incorporation andby-laws and in accordance with their membership agreements. In accordance with Visa’sby-laws prior to the IPO, the Bancorp could have been required to indemnify Visa for the Bancorp’s proportional share of losses based on thepre-IPO membership interests. As part of its reorganization and IPO, the Bancorp’s indemnification obligation was modified to include only certain known or anticipated litigation (the “Covered Litigation”) as of the date of the restructuring. This modification triggered a requirement for the Bancorp to recognize a liability equal to the fair value of the indemnification liability.

Fifth Third Bancorp and Subsidiaries

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)

 

 

In conjunction with the IPO, the Bancorp received 10.1 million of Visa’s Class B common shares (the “Class B Shares”) based on the Bancorp’s membership percentage in Visa prior to the IPO. The Class B Shares are not transferable (other than to another member bank) until the later of the third anniversary of the IPO closing or the date which the Covered Litigation has been resolved; therefore, the Bancorp’s Class B Shares were classified in other assets and accounted for at their carryover basis of $0. Visa deposited $3 billion of the proceeds from the IPO into a litigation escrow account, established for the purpose of funding judgments in, or settlements of, the Covered Litigation. Since then, when Visa’s litigation committee determined that the escrow account was insufficient; Visa issued additional Class A Shares and deposited the proceeds from the sale of the Class A Shares into the litigation escrow account. When Visa funded the litigation escrow account, the Class B Shares were subjected to dilution through an adjustment in the conversion rate of Class B Shares into Class A Shares.

In 2009, the Bancorp completed the sale of Visa, Inc. Class B Shares and entered into a total return swap in which the Bancorp will make or receive payments based on subsequent changes in the conversion rate of the Class B Shares into Class A Shares. The swap terminates on the later of the third anniversary of Visa’s IPO or the date on which the Covered Litigation is settled. Refer to Note 21 for additional information on the valuation of the swap. The counterparty to the swap as a result of its ownership of the Class B Shares will be impacted by dilutive adjustments to the conversion rate of the Class B Shares into Class A Shares caused by any Covered Litigation losses in excess of the litigation escrow account. If actual judgments in, or settlements of, the Covered Litigation significantly exceed current expectations, then additional funding by Visa of the litigation escrow account and the resulting dilution of the Class B Shares could result in a scenario where the Bancorp’s ultimate exposure associated with the Covered Litigation (the “Visa Litigation Exposure”) exceeds the value of the Class B Shares owned by the swap counterparty (the “Class B Value”). In the event the Bancorp concludes that it is probable that the Visa Litigation Exposure exceeds the Class B Value, the Bancorp would record a litigation reserve liability and a corresponding amount of other noninterest expense for the amount of the excess. Any such litigation reserve liability would be separate and distinct from the fair value derivative liability associated with the total return swap.

As of the date of the Bancorp’s sale of the Visa Class B Shares and through June 30, 2017,2018, the Bancorp has concluded that it is not probable that the Visa Litigation Exposure will exceed the Class B value. Based on this determination, upon the sale of Class B Shares, the Bancorp reversed its net Visa litigation reserve liability and recognized a free-standing derivative liability associated with the total return swap. The fair value of the swap liability was $98$164 million at June 30, 20172018 and $91$137 million at December 31, 2016.2017. Refer to Note 1211 and Note 21 for further information.

After the Bancorp’s sale of the Class B Shares, Visa has funded additional amounts into the litigation escrow account which have resulted in further dilutive adjustments to the conversion of Class B Shares into Class A Shares, and along with other terms of the total return swap, required the Bancorp to make cash payments in varying amounts to the swap counterparty as follows:

 

Period ($ in millions)  Visa
    Funding Amount 
 Bancorp Cash
Payment Amount 
      

Visa

    Funding Amount 

 

Bancorp Cash

Payment Amount 

    

Q2 2010

  $500   20    $500  20 

Q4 2010

   800   35     800  35 

Q2 2011

   400   19     400  19 

Q1 2012

   1,565   75     1,565  75 

Q3 2012

   150   6     150  6 

Q3 2014

   450   18     450  18 

Q2 2018

   600  (a) 

(a)    The Bancorp made a cash payment of $26 million to the swap counterparty on July 17, 2018 as a result of the Visa escrow funding in the second quarter of 2018.

Fifth Third Bancorp and Subsidiaries

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)

 

 

17.16. Legal and Regulatory Proceedings

Litigation

Visa/MastercardMasterCard Merchant Interchange Litigation

In April 2006, the Bancorp was added as a defendant in a consolidated antitrust class action lawsuit originally filed against Visa®, MasterCard® and several other major financial institutions in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York (In re: Payment Card Interchange Fee and Merchant Discount Antitrust Litigation). The plaintiffs, merchants operating commercial businesses throughout the U.S. and trade associations, claimed that the interchange fees charged by card-issuing banks were unreasonable and sought injunctive relief and unspecified damages. In addition to being a named defendant, the Bancorp is also subject to a possible indemnification obligation of Visa as discussed in Note 1615 and has also entered into judgment and loss sharing agreements with Visa, MasterCard and certain other named defendants. In October 2012, the parties to the litigation entered into a settlement agreement. On January 14, 2014, the trial court entered a final order approving the class settlement. A number of merchants filed appeals from that approval. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit held a hearing on those appeals and on June 30, 2016, reversed the district court’s approval of the class settlement, remanding the case to the district court for further proceedings. In rejecting the settlement, the appellate court found that counsel for plaintiffs was conflicted and thus could not adequately represent the plaintiff-class members of the separate monetary and injunctive relief settlement classes. The appellate court decertified the settlement classes, ordered that the case return to the trial court and directed the trial court to appoint separate counsel for the separate plaintiff classes. On March 27, 2017, the Supreme Court of the United States denied a petition for writ of certiorari seeking to review the Second Circuit’s decision. Pursuant to the terms of the overturned settlement agreement, the Bancorp previously paid $46 million into a class settlement escrow account. Because the appellate court ruling remands the case to the district court for further proceedings, the ultimate outcome in this matter is uncertain. Approximately 8,000 merchants requested exclusion from the class settlement, and therefore, pursuant to the terms of the overturned settlement agreement, approximately 25% of the funds paid into the class settlement escrow account were already returned to the control of the defendants. The remaining approximately 75% of the settlement funds paid by the Bancorp are maintained in the escrow account. More than 500 of the merchants who requested exclusion from the class filed separate federal lawsuits against Visa, MasterCard and certain other defendants alleging similar antitrust violations. These individual federal lawsuits were transferred to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York. While the Bancorp is only named as a defendant in one of the individual federal lawsuits, it may have obligations pursuant to indemnification arrangements and/or the judgment or loss sharing agreements noted above. On June 5, 2018, the defendants in the consolidated class action reached an agreement to settle in principle with the proposed plaintiffs’ class seeking monetary damages, with the Bancorp’s portion of the settlement amount (above the existing escrow) within reserves. The settlement in principle is subject to finalization and District Court approval. This settlement does not resolve the claims of the separate proposed plaintiffs’ class seeking injunctive relief or the claims of merchants who are pursuing separate lawsuits. Refer to Note 1615 for further information.

Klopfenstein v. Fifth Third Bank

On August 3, 2012, William Klopfenstein and Adam McKinney filed a lawsuit against Fifth Third Bank in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio (Klopfenstein et al. v. Fifth Third Bank), alleging that the 120% APR that Fifth Third disclosed on its Early Access program was misleading. Early Access is a deposit-advance program offered to eligible customers with checking accounts. The plaintiffs sought to represent a nationwide class of customers who used the Early Access program and repaid their cash advances within 30 days. On October 31, 2012, the case was transferred to the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio. In 2013, four similar putative class actions were filed against Fifth Third Bank in federal courts throughout the country (Lori and Danielle Laskaris v. Fifth Third Bank, Janet Fyock v. Fifth Third Bank, Jesse McQuillen v. Fifth Third Bank, and Brian Harrison v. Fifth Third Bank). Those four lawsuits were transferred to the Southern District of Ohio and consolidated with the original lawsuit as In re: Fifth Third Early Access Cash Advance Litigation. On behalf of a putative class, the plaintiffs seek unspecified monetary and statutory damages, injunctive relief, punitive damages, attorney’s fees, andpre- and post-judgment interest. On March 30, 2015, the court dismissed all claims alleged in the consolidated lawsuit except a claim under the TILA. No trial date has been scheduled.

Nina Investments, LLC v. Fifth Third Bank

On July 5, 2012, Nina Investments, LLC (“Nina”)January 10, 2018, plaintiffs filed a lawsuit against Fifth Third Bank (Nina Investments, LLC. v. Fifth Third Bank, et al.) inmotion to hear the Circuitimmediate appeal of the dismissal of their breach of contract claim. On March 28, 2018, the court granted plaintiffs’ motion and stayed the TILA claim pending that appeal. On April 26, 2018, plaintiffs filed their notice of appeal for the breach of contract claim with the U.S. Court of Cook County, Illinois, alleging fraud and conspiracy to commit fraud related to a credit facility established by Fifth Third Bank in 2007 to finance life insurance premiums. Nina invested funds in an entity related toAppeals for the borrower under the credit facility and is claiming over $70 million in damages based on its alleged loss of these funds. Nina alleges that it would have made different investment decisions if Fifth Third had disclosed fraud committed by the borrower with the alleged knowledge of Fifth Third employees. Nina filed this lawsuit in response to a lawsuit filed by Fifth Third Bank in the same court on June 11, 2010 against Nina and other defendants (Fifth Third Bank v. Concord Capital Management, LLC, et al.) alleging fraud and breach of contract. In 2015, the court dismissed Fifth Third’s contract and fraud claims against certain defendants. On March 17, 2017, after hearing motions for summary judgment, the court dismissed, in part, Nina’s fraud claims against Fifth Third, Fifth Third’s claims against the other defendants and Fifth Third’s claim for fraudulent conveyance against Nina. On June 9, 2017, the parties entered into a confidential settlement agreement fully and finally resolving their respective claims in this action within existing accruals for this matter and before accounting for any recovery on related insurance policies. The Court entered an order dismissing the matter with prejudice on June 20, 2017.Sixth Circuit.

Helton v. Fifth Third Bank

On August 31, 2015, trust beneficiaries filed an action against Fifth Third Bank, as trustee, in the Probate Court for Hamilton County, Ohio (Helen Clarke Helton, et al. v. Fifth Third Bank). The plaintiffs allege breach of the duty to diversify, breach of the duty of impartiality, breach of trust/fiduciary duty, and unjust enrichment, based on Fifth Third’s alleged failure to diversify assets held in two trusts for the plaintiffs’ benefit. The lawsuit seeks unspecified monetaryover $800 million in alleged damages, attorney’s fees, removal of Fifth Third as trustee, and injunctive relief. Fifth Third denies all liability. On January 5, 2016,April 20, 2018, the Court denied plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment and granted summary judgment to Fifth Third’s motion to dismiss. Trial is currently scheduled for January 16, 2018. On May 11, 2017, another trust beneficiaryThird, dismissing the case in its entirety. The plaintiffs filed a separate lawsuit against Fifth Third Bank, as trustee, in the Probate Court for Hamilton County, Ohio (F. David Clarke, III v. Fifth Third Bank). Fifth Third moved to consolidate the two cases.

Fifth Third Bancorp and Subsidiaries

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)

notice of appeal on May 5, 2018.

Upsher-Smith Laboratories, Inc. v. Fifth Third Bank

On February 2, 2012,12, 2016, Upsher-Smith Laboratories, Inc. (“Upsher-Smith”) filed suit against Fifth Third Bank in the Fourth Judicial District, Hennepin County, Minnesota (Upsher-Smith Laboratories Inc. v. Fifth Third Bank), alleging that Fifth Third improperly implemented foreign exchange transactions requested by plaintiff’s authorized employee who allegedly was the victim of fraud by a third party. Plaintiff asserts claims for breach of contract and the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing under Article4A-202 of the Uniform Commercial Code, with losses allegedly totaling almost $40 million.million, plus interest. Fifth Third denies all liability in this matter. On March 3, 2016, Fifth Third removed the case to the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota. Fifth Third filed a motion to transfer venue to the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio on April 7, 2016, which was denied on December 29, 2016. Discovery was stayed pending the Court’s ruling on the motion to transfer. No trial date has been scheduled.

The Champions Home Owners Association, Inc. v. Jeffrey D. Quammen, et al.

On July 12, 2017, Fifth Third Bank and Royce Pulliam, P&P Real Estate, LLC and Global Fitness Holdings, LLC (“Plaintiffs”) entered into a settlement agreement pursuant to which the Plaintiffs paid Fifth Third Bank $2.2 million following a 2017 bench trial and ruling and award in favor of Fifth Third Bank in the Circuit Court of Jessamine County, Kentucky. The Plaintiffs had filed their cross-complaint against Fifth Third Bank on September 12, 2013, alleging that Fifth Third Bank breached a contract to provide commercial funding for Plaintiffs’ national fitness franchise. The Plaintiffs claimed to have sustained over $50 million in damages from the alleged contract breach. Fifth Third Bank denied that any breach of contract occurred, and further asserted that Plaintiffs executed multiple releases waiving the claims at issue in the litigation.

Other Litigationlitigation

The Bancorp and its subsidiaries are not parties to any other material litigation. However, there are other litigation matters that arise in the normal course of business. While it is impossible to ascertain the ultimate resolution or range of financial liability with respect to these contingent matters, management believes that the resulting liability, if any, from these other actions would not have a material effect upon the Bancorp’s consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

Fifth Third Bancorp and Subsidiaries

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)

Governmental Investigations and Proceedings

The Bancorp and/or its affiliates are or may become involved in information-gathering requests, reviews, investigations and proceedings (both formal and informal) by various governmental regulatory agencies and law enforcement authorities, including but not limited to the FRB, CFPB, SEC, FINRA, U.S. Department of Justice, etc., as well as state and other governmental authorities and self-regulatory bodies regarding their respective businesses. Additional matters will likely arise from time to time. Any of these matters may result in material adverse consequences or reputational harm to the Bancorp, its affiliates and/or their respective directors, officers and other personnel, including adverse judgments, findings, settlements, fines, penalties, orders, injunctions or other actions, amendments and/or restatements of the Bancorp’s SEC filings and/or financial statements, as applicable, and/or determinations of material weaknesses in our disclosure controls and procedures. Investigations by regulatory authorities may from time to time result in civil or criminal referrals to law enforcement. Additionally, in some cases, regulatory authorities may take supervisory actions that are considered to be confidential supervisory information which may not be publicly disclosed.

Reasonably Possible Losses in Excess of Accruals

The Bancorp and its subsidiaries are parties to numerous claims and lawsuits as well as threatened or potential actions or claims concerning matters arising from the conduct of its business activities. The outcome of claims or litigation and the timing of ultimate resolution are inherently difficult to predict. The following factors, among others, contribute to this lack of predictability: claims often include significant legal uncertainties, damages alleged by plaintiffs are often unspecified or overstated, discovery may not have started or may not be complete and material facts may be disputed or unsubstantiated. As a result of these factors, the Bancorp is not always able to provide an estimate of the range of reasonably possible outcomes for each claim. An accrual for a potential litigation loss is established when information related to the loss contingency indicates both that a loss is probable and that the amount of loss can be reasonably estimated. Any such accrual is adjusted from time to time thereafter as appropriate to reflect changes in circumstances. The Bancorp also determines, when possible (due to the uncertainties described above), estimates of reasonably possible losses or ranges of reasonably possible losses, in excess of amounts accrued. Under U.S. GAAP, an event is “reasonably possible” if “the chance of the future event or events occurring is more than remote but less than likely” and an event is “remote” if “the chance of the future event or events occurring is slight.” Thus, references to the upper end of the range of reasonably possible loss for cases in which the Bancorp is able to estimate a range of reasonably possible loss mean the upper end of the range of loss for cases for which the Bancorp believes the risk of loss is more than slight. For matters where the Bancorp is able to estimate such possible losses or ranges of possible losses, the Bancorp currently estimates that it is reasonably possible that it could incur losses related to legal and regulatory proceedings in an aggregate amount up to approximately $26$5 million in excess of amounts accrued, with it also being reasonably possible that no losses will be incurred in these matters. The estimates included in this amount are based on the Bancorp’s analysis of currently available information, and as new information is obtained the Bancorp may change its estimates.

For these matters and others where an unfavorable outcome is reasonably possible but not probable, there may be a range of possible losses in excess of the established accrual that cannot be estimated. Based on information currently available, advice of counsel, available insurance coverage and established accruals, the Bancorp believes that the eventual outcome of the actions against the Bancorp and/or its subsidiaries, including the matters described above, will not, individually or in the aggregate, have a material adverse effect on the Bancorp’s consolidated financial position. However, in the event of unexpected future developments, it is possible that the ultimate resolution of those matters, if unfavorable, may be material to the Bancorp’s results of operations for any particular period, depending, in part, upon the size of the loss or liability imposed and the operating results for the applicable period.

17. Related Party Transactions

Vantiv Holding, LLC

On January 16, 2018, Vantiv, Inc. completed its previously announced acquisition of Worldpay Group plc. with the resulting combined company named Worldpay, Inc. As a result of this transaction, the Bancorp recognized a gain of $414 million in other noninterest income during the first quarter of 2018 associated with the dilution in its ownership interest in Vantiv Holding, LLC from approximately 8.6% to approximately 4.9%.

On June 27, 2018, the Bancorp completed the sale of 5 million shares of Class A common stock of Worldpay, Inc., formerly Vantiv, Inc. The Bancorp had previously received these Class A shares in exchange for Class B Units of Vantiv Holding, LLC. The Bancorp recognized a gain of $205 million related to the sale. As a result of the sale, the Bancorp beneficially owns approximately 3.3% of Worldpay’s equity through its ownership of approximately 10.3 million Class B Units. The Bancorp’s remaining interest in Vantiv Holding, LLC of $426 million continues to be accounted for as an equity method investment given the nature of Vantiv Holding, LLC’s structure as a limited liability company and contractual arrangements between Vantiv Holding, LLC and the Bancorp.

GS Holdings

In May 2018, GreenSky, Inc. launched an IPO and issued 38 million shares of Class A common stock for a valuation of $23 per share. In connection with this IPO, the Bancorp’s investment in GreenSky, LLC, which was comprised of 252,550 membership units, was converted to 2,525,498 units of the newly formed GreenSky Holdings, LLC (“GS Holdings”), representing a 1.4% interest in GS Holdings. The Bancorp’s units in GS Holdings are exchangeable on aone-to-one basis for Class A common stock or cash after the initial180-daylock-up period expires.

At the time of the IPO, the Bancorp recognized a $16 million gain on its investment in GreenSky, LLC, which was included in other noninterest income in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income for the three and six months ended June 30, 2018. At June 30, 2018, the investment in GS Holdings was $53 million, which was included in equity securities in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets.

Fifth Third Bancorp and Subsidiaries

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)

 

 

18. Income Taxes

The applicable income tax expense was $127$107 million and $103$127 million for the three months ended June 30, 20172018 and 2016,2017, respectively, and was $218$239 million and $212$218 million for the six months ended June 30, 20172018 and 2016,2017, respectively. The effective tax rates for the three months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017 were 15.5% and 2016 were 25.9% and 23.9%, respectively, and were15.7% and 24.5% for both the six months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017, and 2016. Netrespectively. The decrease in the effective tax deficiencies of $5 million and $6 million were reclassified from capital surplus to applicable income tax expenserate for both the three and six months ended June 30, 2016, respectively, related to the early adoption of ASU2016-09 during the fourth quarter of 2016, with an effective date of January 1, 2016. The increase in the effective tax rate for the three months ended June 30, 20172018 compared to the same periodperiods in the prior yearwas primarily related to the result of a tax benefit that was recordedreduction in the second quarterfederal statutory corporate tax rate partially offset by changes to previously deductible items associated with the enactment of 2016 related to a change in the estimated deductibility of a prior expense.TCJA.

While it is reasonably possible that the amount of the unrecognized tax benefits with respect to certain of the Bancorp’s uncertain tax positions could increase or decrease during the next 12 months, the Bancorp believes it is unlikely that its unrecognized tax benefits will change by a material amount during the next 12 months.

Fifth Third Bancorp and Subsidiaries

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)

 

 

19. Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income

The tables below present the activity of the components of OCI and AOCI for the three months ended:

 

    Total OCI   Total AOCI 

June 30, 2018 ($ in millions)

    

Pretax
Activity

     

Tax

Effect

     

Net 

Activity 

   

Beginning

Balance

   

Net

Activity

     

Ending   

Balance   

 

Unrealized holding losses onavailable-for-sale debt securities arising during period

 $  (217)       50       (167)             

Reclassification adjustment for net gains onavailable-for-sale debt securities included in net income

    -              -              

Net unrealized losses onavailable-for-sale debt securities

   (217)       50       (167)        (318)    (167)      (485)     

Unrealized holding gains on cash flow hedge derivatives arising during period

   4        (1)      3              

Reclassification adjustment for net gains on cash flow hedge derivatives included in net income

    -              -              

Net unrealized losses on cash flow hedge derivatives

   4        (1)      3         (19)          (16)     

Reclassification of amounts to net periodic benefit costs

    1              1              

Defined benefit pension plans, net

    1              1         (52)          (51)     

Total

 $  (212)       49       (163)        (389)    (163)      (552)     
                        
       Total OCI   Total AOCI   Total OCI   Total AOCI 
June 30, 2017 ($ in millions)       Pretax
Activity
   Tax
Effect
   Net 
Activity 
   Beginning
Balance
   Net
Activity
   Ending   
Balance   
     

Pretax
Activity

     

Tax

Effect

     

Net

Activity

   

Beginning

Balance

   

Net

Activity

     

Ending    

Balance    

 

Unrealized holding gains onavailable-for-sale securities arising during period

  $    148      (55)     93              $ 148        (55)      93              

Reclassification adjustment for net gains onavailable-for-sale securities included in net income

      -      -      -                 -              -              

Net unrealized gains onavailable-for-sale securities

     148      (55)     93          117      93      210         148        (55)      93         117     93       210      

Unrealized holding gains on cash flow hedge derivatives arising during period

     8      (3)     5               8        (3)      5              

Reclassification adjustment for net gains on cash flow hedge derivatives included in net income

      (6)     2      (4)               (6)             (4)             

Net unrealized gains on cash flow hedge derivatives

     2      (1)     1          2      1      3         2        (1)      1                   3      

Reclassification of amounts to net periodic benefit costs

      2      (1)     1                2        (1)      1              

Defined benefit pension plans, net

      2      (1)     1          (51)     1      (50)         2        (1)      1         (51)          (50)     

Total

  $    152      (57)     95          68      95      163        $ 152        (57)      95         68     95       163      
                     
      Total OCI   Total AOCI 
June 30, 2016 ($ in millions)       Pretax
Activity
   Tax
Effect
   Net
Activity
   Beginning
Balance
   Net
Activity
   Ending    
Balance    
 

Unrealized holding gains onavailable-for-sale securities arising during period

  $    309      (109)     200             

Reclassification adjustment for net gains onavailable-for-sale securities included in net income

      (8)     2      (6)            

Net unrealized gains onavailable-for-sale securities

     301      (107)     194          685      194      879       

Unrealized holding gains on cash flow hedge derivatives arising during period

     26      (9)     17             

Reclassification adjustment for net gains on cash flow hedge derivatives included in net income

      (12)     4      (8)            

Net unrealized gains on cash flow hedge derivatives

     14      (5)     9          61      9      70       

Reclassification of amounts to net periodic benefit costs

      3      (1)     2             

Defined benefit pension plans, net

      3      (1)     2          (62)     2      (60)      

Total

  $    318      (113)     205          684      205      889       

Fifth Third Bancorp and Subsidiaries

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)

 

 

The tables below present the activity of the components of OCI and AOCI for the six months ended:

 

     Total OCI Total AOCI 
June 30, 2018 ($ in millions)    

Pretax

Activity

     

  Tax  

  Effect  

     

  Net 

  Activity 

 

Beginning

Balance(a)

     

  Net  

  Activity  

     

  Ending   

  Balance   

 

Unrealized holding losses onavailable-for-sale debt securities arising during period

 $    (811)      184       (627)              

Reclassification adjustment for net losses onavailable-for-sale debt securities included in net income

        (2)      7               

Net unrealized losses onavailable-for-sale debt securities

   (802)      182       (620)       135       (620)      (485)     

Unrealized holding losses on cash flow hedge derivatives arising during period

   (5)            (4)              

Reclassification adjustment for net gains on cash flow hedge derivatives included in net income

  (1)            (1)              

Net unrealized losses on cash flow hedge derivatives

   (6)            (5)       (11)      (5)      (16)     

Reclassification of amounts to net periodic benefit costs

              2               

Defined benefit pension plans, net

              2        (53)            (51)     

Total

 $    (806)      183       (623)       71       (623)      (552)     

(a) The Bancorp’s AOCI balance was adjusted as of January 1, 2018 to reflect the adoption of new accounting standards. Refer to Note 3 for additional information.

(a) The Bancorp’s AOCI balance was adjusted as of January 1, 2018 to reflect the adoption of new accounting standards. Refer to Note 3 for additional information.

 

       Total OCI   Total AOCI     Total OCI Total AOCI 
June 30, 2017 ($ in millions)       Pretax
Activity
   Tax
Effect
   Net 
Activity 
   Beginning
Balance
   Net
Activity
   Ending   
Balance   
     

Pretax

Activity

     

  Tax  

  Effect  

     

  Net 

  Activity 

 

Beginning

Balance

     

  Net  

  Activity  

     

  Ending   

  Balance   

 

Unrealized holding gains onavailable-for-sale securities arising during period

  $    170      (62)     108              $   170       (62)      108               

Reclassification adjustment for net losses onavailable-for-sale securities included in net income

      2      (1)     1                    (1)      1               

Net unrealized gains onavailable-for-sale securities

     172      (63)     109          101       109         210       172       (63)      109       101       109           210      

Unrealized holding gains on cash flow hedge derivatives arising during period

     3      (1)     2                     (1)      2               

Reclassification adjustment for net gains on cash flow hedge derivatives included in net income

      (14)     5      (9)             (14)            (9)              

Net unrealized gains on cash flow hedge derivatives

     (11)     4      (7)         10       (7)        3       (11)            (7)      10       (7)          3      

Reclassification of amounts to net periodic benefit costs

      3      (1)     2                    (1)      2               

Defined benefit pension plans, net

      3      (1)     2          (52)      2         (50)           (1)      2       (52)      2           (50)     

Total

  $    164      (60)     104          59       104         163      $   164       (60)      104       59       104           163      
                     
      Total OCI   Total AOCI 
June 30, 2016 ($ in millions)       Pretax
Activity
   Tax
Effect
   Net
Activity
   Beginning
Balance
   Net
Activity
   Ending
Balance
 

Unrealized holding gains onavailable-for-sale securities arising during period

  $    1,004      (352)    652             

Reclassification adjustment for net gains onavailable-for-sale securities included in net income

      (16)         (11)            

Net unrealized gains onavailable-for-sale securities

     988      (347)    641          238       641         879     

Unrealized holding gains on cash flow hedge derivatives arising during period

     100      (35)    65             

Reclassification adjustment for net gains on cash flow hedge derivatives included in net income

      (26)         (17)            

Net unrealized gains on cash flow hedge derivatives

     74      (26)    48          22       48         70     

Reclassification of amounts to net periodic benefit costs

      5      (2)    3             

Defined benefit pension plans, net

      5      (2)    3          (63)      3         (60)    

Total

  $    1,067      (375)    692          197       692         889     

Fifth Third Bancorp and Subsidiaries

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)

 

 

The table below presents reclassifications out of AOCI:

 

Components of AOCI: ($ in millions)

 

Condensed Consolidated

Statements of Income Caption

    For the three months
ended June 30,
    

For the six months

ended June 30,

    

Condensed Consolidated

Statements of Income Caption

    For the three months
ended June 30,
      For the six months
ended June 30,
 
    2017 2016    2017 2016      2018 2017   2018 2017 

Net unrealized gains onavailable-for-sale securities:(b)

       

Net (losses) gains included in net income

 Securities gains, net $  -     (2 16 

Net unrealized losses on available-for-sale debt securities:(b)

           

Net losses included in net income

    Securities (losses) gains, net $  -        (9 (2
 Income before income taxes   -     (2 16     Income before income taxes   -        (9 (2
 Applicable income tax expense   -  (2)   1  (5)    Applicable income tax expense   -        2  1 
 Net income   -     (1 11     Net income   -        (7 (1

Net unrealized gains on cash flow hedge derivatives:(b)

                  

Interest rate contracts related to C&I loans

 Interest and fees on loans and leases   6  12    14  26     Interest and fees on loans and leases   -       1  14 
 Income before income taxes   6  12    14  26     Income before income taxes   -       1  14 
 Applicable income tax expense   (2 (4)   (5 (9)    Applicable income tax expense   -  (2)     -  (5
 Net income   4     9  17     Net income   -       1  9 

Net periodic benefit costs:(b)

                  

Amortization of net actuarial loss

 Employee benefits expense(a)   (2 (3)   (3 (5)    Employee benefits expense(a)   (1 (2)     (2 (3
 

Income before income taxes

   (2 (3)   (3 (5)    

Income before income taxes

   (1 (2)     (2 (3
 Applicable income tax expense   1     1      Applicable income tax expense   -       -  1 
 

Net income

 

   

 

(1

 

 

 

(2)

 

   

 

(2

 

 

 

(3)

 

    Net income   (1 (1)     (2 (2
          

Total reclassifications for the period

 Net income $  3  12   6  25     Net income $  (1      (8 6 
(a)

This AOCI component is included in the computation of net periodic benefit cost. Refer to Note 21 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in the Bancorp’s Annual Report on Form10-K for the year ended December 31, 20162017 for further information.

(b)

Amounts in parentheses indicate reductions to net income.

Fifth Third Bancorp and Subsidiaries

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)

 

 

20. Earnings Per Share

The following tables provide the calculation of earnings per share and the reconciliation of earnings per share and earnings per diluted share:

 

      2017   2016(a) 

For the three months ended June 30,

(in millions, except per share data)

    Income   Average
Shares
   Per Share
Amount
   Income   Average
Shares
   Per Share  
Amount 
 

Earnings Per Share:

                               

Net income available to common shareholders

 

$

          344        305     

Less: Income allocated to participating securities

    4              3           

Net income allocated to common shareholders

 

$

  340    741    0.46    302    759    0.40 

Earnings Per Diluted Share:

            

Net income available to common shareholders

 

$

  344        305     

Effect of dilutive securities:

            

Stock-based awards

    -    11         -    6      

Net income available to common shareholders plus assumed conversions

   344        305     

Less: Income allocated to participating securities

    4              3           

Net income allocated to common shareholders plus assumed conversions

 

$

  340    752    0.45    302    765    0.39 
(a)

A net tax deficiency of $5 was reclassified from capital surplus to applicable income tax expense and average common shares outstanding - diluted were adjusted for the three months ended June 30, 2016 related to the early adoption of ASU2016-09 during the fourth quarter of 2016, with an effective date of January 1, 2016.

      2017   2016(a) 

For the six months ended June 30,

(in millions, except per share data)

    Income   Average
Shares
   Per Share
Amount
   Income   Average
Shares
   Per Share  
Amount 
 

Earnings Per Share:

                               

Net income available to common shareholders

 

$

              634        616     

Less: Income allocated to participating securities

    7              6           

Net income allocated to common shareholders

 

$

  627    745    0.84    610    766    0.80 

Earnings Per Diluted Share:

            

Net income available to common shareholders

 

$

  634        616     

Effect of dilutive securities:

            

Stock-based awards

    -    12         -    5      

Net income available to common shareholders plus assumed conversions

   634        616     

Less: Income allocated to participating securities

    7              6           

Net income allocated to common shareholders plus assumed conversions

 

$

  627    757    0.83    610    771    0.79 
(a)

Net tax deficiencies of $6 were reclassified from capital surplus to applicable income tax expense and average common shares outstanding - diluted were adjusted for the six months ended June 30, 2016 related to the early adoption of ASU2016-09 during the fourth quarter of 2016, with an effective date of January 1, 2016.

      2018            2017        

For the three months ended June 30,

(in millions, except per share data)

    Income     Average  
Shares  
   Per Share
Amount
     Income     Average
Shares
     Per Share
Amount
 

Earnings Per Share:

                    

Net income available to common shareholders

 

$

          563            344         

Less: Income allocated to participating securities

    6                  4               

Net income allocated to common shareholders

 

$

  557      683    0.81      340      741      0.46 

Earnings Per Diluted Share:

                    

Net income available to common shareholders

 

$

  563            344         

Effect of dilutive securities:

                    

Stock-based awards

    -      13           -      11        

Net income available to common shareholders plus assumed conversions

   563            344         

Less: Income allocated to participating securities

    6                  4               

Net income allocated to common shareholders plus assumed conversions

 

$

  557      696    0.80      340      752      0.45 
                    
      2018            2017        

For the six months ended June 30,

(in millions, except per share data)

    Income     Average  
Shares  
   Per Share
Amount
     Income     Average
Shares
     Per Share
Amount
 

Earnings Per Share:

                    

Net income available to common shareholders

 

$

  1,252            634         

Less: Income allocated to participating securities

    15                  7               

Net income allocated to common shareholders

 

$

  1,237      687    1.80      627      745      0.84 

Earnings Per Diluted Share:

                    

Net income available to common shareholders

 

$

  1,252            634         

Effect of dilutive securities:

                    

Stock-based awards

    -      13           -      12        

Net income available to common shareholders plus assumed conversions

   1,252            634         

Less: Income allocated to participating securities

    14                  7               

Net income allocated to common shareholders plus assumed conversions

 

$

  1,238      700    1.77      627      757      0.83 

Shares are excluded from the computation of earnings per diluted share when their inclusion has an anti-dilutive effect on earnings per share. The diluted earnings per share computation for both the three and six months ended June 30, 20172018 excludes 42 million and 5 million, respectively, of SARs and an immaterial amount of stock options because their inclusion would have been anti-dilutive. The diluted earnings per share computation for the three and six months ended June 30, 20162017 excludes 224 million and 245 million, respectively, of SARs and an immaterial amount of stock options because their inclusion would have been anti-dilutive.

The diluted earnings per share computation for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017 excludes the impact of the forward contract related to the May 1, 2017 accelerated share repurchase transaction. Based upon the average daily volume weighted-average price of the Bancorp’s common stock during the second quarter of 2017, the counterparty to the transaction would have been required to deliver additional shares for the settlement of the forward contract as of June 30, 2017, and thus the impact of the forward contract related to the accelerated share repurchase transaction would have been anti-dilutive to earnings per share.

Fifth Third Bancorp and Subsidiaries

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)

 

 

21. Fair Value Measurements

The Bancorp measures certain financial assets and liabilities at fair value in accordance with U.S. GAAP, which defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. U.S. GAAP also establishes a fair value hierarchy, which prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value into three broad levels. The fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority to quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3). A financial instrument’s categorization within the fair value hierarchy is based upon the lowest level of input that is significant to the instrument’s fair value measurement. For more information regarding the fair value hierarchy, refer to Note 1 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in the Bancorp’s Annual Report on Form10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016.2017.

Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis

The following tables summarize assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of:

 

 

 
 Fair Value Measurements Using                     Fair Value Measurements Using                    
 

 

 

    

 

 

  
June 30, 2017 ($ in millions)         Level 1(c)                  Level 2(c)                Level 3       Total Fair Value    

 
June 30, 2018 ($ in millions)          Level  1(c)           Level 2(c)           Level 3         Total Fair Value   

Assets:

           

Available-for-sale and other securities:

    

Available-for-sale debt and other securities:

       

U.S. Treasury and federal agencies securities

 $69   -   -   69    $96    -    -   96 

Obligations of states and political subdivisions securities

  -   45   -   45     -    35    -   35 

Mortgage-backed securities:

           

Agency residential mortgage-backed securities

  -   16,177   -   16,177     -    16,094    -   16,094 

Agency commercial mortgage-backed securities

  -   9,262   -   9,262     -    10,038    -   10,038 

Non-agency commercial mortgage-backed securities

  -   3,364   -   3,364     -    3,086    -   3,086 

Asset-backed securities and other debt securities

  -   2,206   -   2,206     -    1,998    -   1,998 

Equity securities(a)

  89   1   -   90  

 

Available-for-sale and other securities(a)

  158   31,055   -   31,213  

Trading securities:

    

Available-for-sale debt and other securities(a)

   96    31,251    -   31,347 

Trading debt securities:

       

U.S. Treasury and federal agencies securities

  -   20   -   20     10    9    -   19 

Obligations of states and political subdivisions securities

  -   27   -   27     -    58    -   58 

Mortgage-backed securities:

    

Agency residential mortgage-backed securities

  -   413   -   413     -    75    -   75 

Asset-backed securities and other debt securities

  -   30   -   30     -    128    -   128 

Trading debt securities

   10    270    -   280 

Equity securities

  352   -   -   352     474    1    -   475 

 

Trading securities

  352   490   -   842  

Residential mortgage loans held for sale

  -   674   -   674     -    658    -   658 

Residential mortgage loans(b)

  -   -   142   142     -    -    162   162 

MSRs(f)

  -   -   849   849  

Commercial loans held for sale

   -    8    -   8 

MSRs

   -    -    959   959 

Derivative assets:

           

Interest rate contracts

  3   555   14   572     -    529    11   540 

Foreign exchange contracts

  -   118   -   118     -    121    -   121 

Commodity contracts

  39   51   -   90     34    250    -   284 

 

Derivative assets(d)

  42   724   14   780     34    900    11   945 

 

Total assets

 $552   32,943   1,005   34,500    $614    33,088    1,132   34,834 

 

Liabilities:

           

Derivative liabilities:

           

Interest rate contracts

 $3   161   5   169    $4    305    7   316 

Foreign exchange contracts

  -   133   -   133     -    109    -   109 

Equity contracts

  -   -   98   98     -    -    164   164 

Commodity contracts

  7   84   -   91     95    175    -   270 

 

Derivative liabilities(e)

  10   378   103   491     99    589    171   859 

Short positions(e)

  17   5   -   22     88    51    -   139 

 

Total liabilities

 $27   383   103   513    $187    640    171   998 

 
(a)

Excludes FHLB, FRB and DTCC restricted stock holdings totaling$248,$360364 and$2, respectively, atJune 30, 20172018.

(b)

Includes residential mortgage loans originated as held for sale and subsequently transferred to held for investment.

(c)

During both the three and six months endedJune 30, 2017,2018, no assets or liabilities were transferred between Level 1 and Level 2.

(d)

Included in other assets in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets.

(e)

Included in other liabilities in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets.

(f)

Effective January 1, 2017, the Bancorp has elected the fair value measurement method for all existing classes of its residential mortgage servicing rights. The servicing rights were measured at fair value at June 30, 2017 and were measured under the amortization method at December 31, 2016.

Fifth Third Bancorp and Subsidiaries

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)

 

 

 Fair Value Measurements Using                     Fair Value Measurements Using                       
 

 

 

    

 

 

   
December 31, 2016 ($ in millions)         Level 1(c)                Level 2(c)                  Level 3       Total Fair Value    

 
December 31, 2017 ($ in millions)          Level 1(c)            Level 2(c)           Level 3           Total Fair Value   

Assets:

            

Available-for-sale and other securities:

    

Available-for-sale debt and other securities:

        

U.S. Treasury and federal agencies securities

 $471  78   -  549    $98    -    -    98 

Obligations of states and political subdivisions securities

  -  45   -  45     -    44    -    44 

Mortgage-backed securities:

            

Agency residential mortgage-backed securities

  -  15,608   -  15,608     -    15,319    -    15,319 

Agency commercial mortgage-backed securities

  -  9,055   -  9,055     -    10,167    -    10,167 

Non-agency commercial mortgage-backed securities

  -  3,112   -  3,112     -    3,293    -    3,293 

Asset-backed securities and other debt securities

  -  2,116   -  2,116     -    2,218    -    2,218 

Equity securities(a)

 90  1   -  91  

 

 

Available-for-sale and other securities(a)

 561  30,015   -  30,576  

Trading securities:

    

Available-for-sale debt and other securities(a)

   98    31,041    -    31,139 

Trading debt securities:

        

U.S. Treasury and federal agencies securities

  -  23   -  23     1    11    -    12 

Obligations of states and political subdivisions securities

  -  39   -  39     -    22    -    22 

Mortgage-backed securities:

    

Agency residential mortgage-backed securities

  -  8   -   

Residential mortgage-backed securities

   -    395    -    395 

Asset-backed securities and other debt securities

  -  15   -  15     -    63    -    63 

 

Trading debt securities

   1    491    -    492 

Equity securities

 325   -   -  325     438    1      439 

 

Trading securities

 325  85   -  410  

Residential mortgage loans held for sale

  -  686   -  686     -    399    -    399 

Residential mortgage loans(b)

  -   -  143  143     -    -    137    137 

MSRs

   -    -    858    858 

Derivative assets:

            

Interest rate contracts

 20  715  13  748     1    505    8    514 

Foreign exchange contracts

  -  202   -  202     -    124    -    124 

Equity contracts

   -    20    -    20 

Commodity contracts

 22  85   -  107     39    126    -    165 

 

Derivative assets(d)

 42  1,002  13  1,057     40    775    8    823 

 

Total assets

 $928  31,788  156  32,872    $577    32,707    1,003    34,287 

 

Liabilities:

            

Derivative liabilities:

            

Interest rate contracts

 $3  257  5  265    $1    172    5    178 

Foreign exchange contracts

  -  204   -  204     -    120    -    120 

Equity contracts

  -   -  91  91     -    -    137    137 

Commodity contracts

 27  79   -  106     38    129    -    167 

 

 

Derivative liabilities(e)

 30  540  96  666     39    421    142    602 

Short positions(e)

 17  4   -  21     25    6    -    31 

 

 

Total liabilities

 $47  544  96  687    $64    427    142    633 

 

 
(a)

Excludes FHLB, FRB, and DTCC restricted stock holdings totaling $248, $358$362 and $1,$2, respectively, at December 31, 2016.2017.

(b)

Includes residential mortgage loans originated as held for sale and subsequently transferred to held for investment.

(c)

During the year ended December 31, 2016,2017, no assets or liabilities were transferred between Level 1 and Level 2.

(d)

Included in other assets in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets.

(e)

Included in other liabilities in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets.

The following is a description of the valuation methodologies used for significant instruments measured at fair value, as well as the general classification of such instruments pursuant to the valuation hierarchy.

Available-for-sale debt and other securities, trading debt securities and tradingequity securities

Where quoted prices are available in an active market, securities are classified within Level 1 of the valuation hierarchy. Level 1 securities include U.S. Treasury securities and exchange-traded equities.equity securities. If quoted market prices are not available, then fair values are estimated using pricing models, quoted prices of securities with similar characteristics or DCFs. Level 2 securities may include federal agencies securities, obligations of states and political subdivisions securities, agency andnon-agency residential mortgage-backed securities, agency andnon-agency commercial mortgage-backed securities, asset-backed securities and other debt securities and equity securities. These securities are generally valued using a market approach based on observable prices of securities with similar characteristics.

Residential mortgage loans held for sale

For residential mortgage loans held for sale for which the fair value election has been made, fair value is estimated based upon mortgage-backed securities prices and spreads to those prices or, for certain ARM loans, DCF models that may incorporate the anticipated portfolio composition, credit spreads of asset-backed securities with similar collateral and market conditions. The anticipated portfolio composition includes the effect of interest rate spreads and discount rates due to loan characteristics such as the state in which the loan was originated, the loan amount and the ARM margin. Residential mortgage loans held for sale that are valued based on mortgage-backed securities prices are classified within Level 2 of the valuation hierarchy as the valuation is based on external pricing for similar instruments. ARM loans classified as held for sale are also classified within Level 2 of the valuation hierarchy due to the use of observable inputs in the DCF model. These observable inputs include interest rate spreads from agency mortgage-backed securities market rates and observable discount rates.

Fifth Third Bancorp and Subsidiaries

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)

Commercial loans held for sale

For commercial loans held for sale for which the fair value election has been made, fair value is estimated based upon quoted prices of identical or similar assets in an active market, which are reviewed and approved by the Market Risk department, which reports to the Bancorp’s Chief Risk Officer. These loans are generally valued using a market approach based on observable prices and are classified within Level 2 of the valuation hierarchy.

Residential mortgage loans

Residential mortgage loans held for sale that are reclassified to held for investment are transferred from Level 2 to Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy. It is the Bancorp’s policy to value any transfers between levels of the fair value hierarchy based on end of period fair values.

Fifth Third Bancorp and Subsidiaries

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)

For residential mortgage loans for which the fair value election has been made, and that are reclassified from held for sale to held for investment, the fair value estimation is based on mortgage-backed securities prices, interest rate risk and an internally developed credit component. Therefore, these loans are classified within Level 3 of the valuation hierarchy. An adverse change in the loss rate or severity assumption would result in a decrease in fair value of the related loan. The Secondary Marketing department, which reports to the Bancorp’s Head of the Consumer Bank, in conjunction with the Consumer Credit Risk department, which reports to the Bancorp’s Chief Risk Officer, are responsible for determining the valuation methodology for residential mortgage loans held for investment. The Secondary Marketing department reviews loss severity assumptions quarterly to determine if adjustments are necessary based on decreases in observable housing market data. This group also reviews trades in comparable benchmark securities and adjusts the values of loans as necessary. Consumer Credit Risk is responsible for the credit component of the fair value which is based on internally developed loss rate models that take into account historical loss rates and loss severities based on underlying collateral values.

MSRs

Effective January 1, 2017, the Bancorp elected the fair value measurement method for all existing classes of its residential mortgage servicing rights. MSRs do not trade in an active, open market with readily observable prices. While sales of MSRs do occur, the precise terms and conditions typically are not readily available. Accordingly, the Bancorp estimates the fair value of MSRs using internal OAS models with certain unobservable inputs, primarily prepayment speed assumptions, OAS and weighted-average lives, resulting in a classification within Level 3 of the valuation hierarchy. Refer to Note 1110 for further information on the assumptions used in the valuation of the Bancorp’s MSRs. The Secondary Marketing department and Treasury department are responsible for determining the valuation methodology for MSRs. Representatives from Secondary Marketing, Treasury, Accounting and Risk Management are responsible for reviewing key assumptions used in the internal OAS model. Two external valuations of the MSR portfolio are obtained from third parties quarterly that use valuation models in order to assess the reasonableness of the internal OAS model. Additionally, the Bancorp participates in peer surveys that provide additional confirmation of the reasonableness of key assumptions utilized in the MSR valuation process and the resulting MSR prices.

Derivatives

Exchange-traded derivatives valued using quoted prices and certainover-the-counter derivatives valued using active bids are classified within Level 1 of the valuation hierarchy. Most of the Bancorp’s derivative contracts are valued using DCF or other models that incorporate current market interest rates, credit spreads assigned to the derivative counterparties and other market parameters and, therefore, are classified within Level 2 of the valuation hierarchy. Such derivatives include basic and structured interest rate, foreign exchange and commodity swaps and options. Derivatives that are valued based upon models with significant unobservable market parameters are classified within Level 3 of the valuation hierarchy. At June 30, 20172018 and December 31, 2016,2017, derivatives classified as Level 3, which are valued using models containing unobservable inputs, consisted primarily of a total return swap associated with the Bancorp’s sale of Visa, Inc. Class B Shares. Level 3 derivatives also include IRLCs, which utilize internally generated loan closing rate assumptions as a significant unobservable input in the valuation process.

Under the terms of the total return swap, the Bancorp will make or receive payments based on subsequent changes in the conversion rate of the Visa, Inc. Class B Shares into Class A Shares. Additionally, the Bancorp will make a quarterly payment based on Visa’s stock price and the conversion rate of the Visa, Inc. Class B Shares into Class A Shares until the date on which the Covered Litigation is settled. The fair value of the total return swap was calculated using a DCF model based on unobservable inputs consisting of management’s estimate of the probability of certain litigation scenarios, the timing of the resolution of the Covered Litigation and Visa litigation loss estimates in excess, or shortfall, of the Bancorp’s proportional share of escrow funds.

An increase in the loss estimate or a delay in the resolution of the Covered Litigation would result in an increase in the fair value;value of the derivative liability; conversely, a decrease in the loss estimate or an acceleration of the resolution of the Covered Litigation would result in a decrease in the fair value.value of the derivative liability. The Accounting and Treasury departments, both of which report to the Bancorp’s Chief Financial Officer, determined the valuation methodology for the total return swap. Accounting and Treasury review the changes in fair value on a quarterly basis for reasonableness based on Visa stock price changes, litigation contingencies and escrow funding.

The net asset fair value asset of the IRLCs at June 30, 20172018 was $14$11 million. Immediate decreases in current interest rates of 25 bps and 50 bps would result in increases in the fair value of the IRLCs of approximately $6 million and $12$11 million, respectively. Immediate increases of current interest rates of 25 bps and 50 bps would result in decreases in the fair value of the IRLCs of approximately $7$6 million and $15$12 million, respectively. The decrease in fair value of IRLCs due to immediate 10% and 20% adverse changes in the assumed loan closing rates would be approximately $1 million and $3$2 million, respectively, and the increase in fair value due to immediate 10% and 20% favorable changes in the assumed loan closing rates would be approximately $1 million and $3$2 million, respectively. These sensitivities are hypothetical and should be used with caution, as changes in fair value based on a variation in assumptions typically cannot be extrapolated because the relationship of the change in assumptions to the change in fair value may not be linear.

The Consumer Line of Business Finance department, which reports to the Bancorp’s Chief Financial Officer, and the aforementioned Secondary Marketing department are responsible for determining the valuation methodology for IRLCs. Secondary Marketing, in conjunction with a third party valuation provider, periodically review loan closing rate assumptions and recent loan sales to determine if adjustments are needed for current market conditions not reflected in historical data.

The Bancorp previously held a warrant, which was fully exercised in 2016, associated with the initial sale of the Bancorp’s 51% interest in Vantiv Holding, LLC to Advent International. The fair value of the warrant was calculated in conjunction with a third party valuation provider by applying Black-Scholes option-pricing models using probability weighted scenarios which contained the following inputs: Vantiv, Inc. stock price, strike price per the Warrant Agreement and unobservable inputs, such as expected term and expected volatility.

Fifth Third Bancorp and Subsidiaries

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)

 

 

For the warrant, an increase in the expected term (years) and the expected volatility assumptions would resultShort positions

Where quoted prices are available in an increase in the fair value; conversely, a decrease in these assumptions would result in a decrease in the fair value. The Accounting and Treasury departments, bothactive market, short positions are classified within Level 1 of which report to the Bancorp’s Chief Financial Officer, determined the valuation methodology for the warrant. Accountinghierarchy. If quoted market prices are not available, then fair values are estimated using pricing models, quoted prices of securities with similar characteristics or DCFs and Treasury reviewed changes in fair value on a quarterly basis for reasonableness based on changes in historical and implied volatilities, expected terms, probability weightingstherefore are classified within Level 2 of the related scenarios and other assumptions.valuation hierarchy.

The following tables are a reconciliation of assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3):

 

 

 
   Fair Value Measurements Using Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) 
  

 

 

 
For the three months ended June 30, 2017 ($ in millions)  Residential
Mortgage
Loans
  MSRs(d)  Interest Rate
Derivatives,
Net(a)
  Equity
Derivatives
  Total
Fair Value  
 

 

 

Balance, beginning of period

  $141        776       11           (97)            831 

Total gains (losses) (realized/unrealized):

      

  Included in earnings

   1        (47)      26           (9)            (29

Purchases/originations

   -        120       -           -             120 

Settlements

   (4)       -       (28)          8             (24

Transfers into Level 3(b)

   4        -       -           -             4 

 

 

Balance, end of period

  $142        849       9           (98)            902 

 

 

The amount of total gains (losses) for the period included in earnings attributable to the change in unrealized gains or losses relating to assets still held at June 30, 2017(c)

  $1        (47)      14           (9)            (41) 

 

 
(a)

Net interest rate derivatives include derivative assets and liabilities of$14and$5, respectively, as ofJune 30, 2017.

(b)

Includes certain residential mortgage loans originated as held for sale that were transferred to held for investment.

(c)

Includes interest income and expense.

(d)

Effective January 1, 2017, the Bancorp has elected the fair value measurement method for all existing classes of its residential mortgage servicing rights. The servicing rights were measured at fair value at June 30, 2017 and were measured under the amortization method at December 31, 2016.

      
 Fair Value Measurements Using Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)   

Fair Value Measurements Using Significant Unobservable  Inputs (Level 3)

 

For the three months ended June 30, 2018 ($ in millions)

  

Residential

Mortgage

Loans

 MSRs 

Interest Rate

Derivatives,

Net(a)

 

Equity

Derivatives

 

Total

Fair Value

 

Balance, beginning of period

  $136           926        4            (165)          901  

Total (losses) gains (realized/unrealized):

      

Included in earnings

   (1)          (13)       22            (10)          (2) 

Purchases/originations

   -           46        (1)          -            45  

Settlements

   (5)          -         (21)          11            (15) 

Transfers into Level 3(b)

   32           -         -            -            32  

Balance, end of period

  $162           959        4            (164)          961  

The amount of total (losses) gains for the period included in earnings attributable to the change in unrealized gains or losses relating to instruments still held at June 30, 2018(c)

  $(1)          (13)       12            (10)          (12) 

(a) Net interest rate derivatives include derivative assets and liabilities of$11and$7, respectively, as ofJune 30, 2018.

(b) Includes certain residential mortgage loans originated as held for sale that were transferred to held for investment.

(c) Includes interest income and expense.

(a) Net interest rate derivatives include derivative assets and liabilities of$11and$7, respectively, as ofJune 30, 2018.

(b) Includes certain residential mortgage loans originated as held for sale that were transferred to held for investment.

(c) Includes interest income and expense.

    

    

    

 

 

 

      
For the three months ended June 30, 2016 ($ in millions) 

Residential
Mortgage

Loans

 

Interest Rate
Derivatives,

Net(a)

 

Equity
Derivatives,

Net(a)

 

Total  

Fair Value  

 
  

Fair Value Measurements Using Significant Unobservable  Inputs (Level 3)

 

For the three months ended June 30, 2017 ($ in millions)

  

Residential

Mortgage

Loans

 

MSRs

 

Interest Rate

Derivatives,

Net(a)

 

Equity

Derivatives,

Net

 

Total

Fair Value

 

 

 

Balance, beginning of period

 $160         25            253            438    $141          776       11           (97)         831  

Total gains (losses) (realized/unrealized):

    

Total (losses) gains (realized/unrealized):

      

Included in earnings

 1           43            (31)           13     1          (47)      26           (9)         (29) 

Purchases/originations

   -          120        -            -          120  

Settlements

 (11)        (38)           6            (43)    (4)          -        (28)         8          (24) 

Transfers into Level 3(b)

 4          -             -                4           -         -            -           

 

 

Balance, end of period

 $154         30            228            412    $142          849       9           (98)         902  

 

 

The amount of total gains (losses) for the period included in earnings attributable to the change in unrealized gains or losses relating to assets still held at June 30, 2016(c)

 $1         33            (31)            

The amount of total (losses) gains for the period included in earnings attributable to the change in unrealized gains or losses relating to instruments still held at June 30, 2017(c)

  $1         (47)      14          (9)         (41) 

 

 
(a)

Net interest rate derivatives include derivative assets and liabilities of $34$14 and $4,$5, respectively, as of June 30, 2016. Net equity derivatives include derivative assets and liabilities of $327 and $99, respectively, as of June 30, 2016.2017.

(b)

Includes certain residential mortgage loans held for sale that were transferred to held for investment.

(c)

Includes interest income and expense.

Fifth Third Bancorp and Subsidiaries

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)

 

 

  Fair Value Measurements Using Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)    Fair Value Measurements Using Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) 
 

 

 

 
For the six months ended June 30, 2017 ($ in millions) Residential
Mortgage
Loans
 MSRs(d) Interest Rate
Derivatives,
Net(a)
 Equity
Derivatives
     Total  
    Fair Value  
 
For the six months ended June 30, 2018 ($ in millions)   Residential
Mortgage
Loans
   MSRs(d)   Interest Rate
Derivatives,
Net(a)
   Equity
Derivatives
       Total  
    Fair Value  
 

 

 

Balance, beginning of period

 $143         744       8          (91)         804         $      137           858        3           (137)          861  

Total gains (losses) (realized/unrealized):

     

Total (losses) gains (realized/unrealized):

           

Included in earnings

  1         (70)      49          (22)         (42)         (4)          16        36           (49)          (1) 

Purchases/originations

  -         175       (1)         -          174          -           85        (4)          -           81  

Settlements

  (9)        -        (47)         15          (41)         (8)          -        (31)          22           (17) 

Transfers into Level 3(b)

  7         -        -          -          7          37           -        -           -           37  

 

 

Balance, end of period

 $142         849        9          (98)         902         $162           959        4           (164)          961  

 

 

The amount of total gains (losses) for the period included in earnings attributable to the change in unrealized gains or losses relating to assets still held at June 30, 2017(c)

 $1         (70)       15          (22)         (76)     

The amount of total (losses) gains for the period included in earnings attributable to the change in unrealized gains or losses relating to assets still held at June 30, 2018(c)

   $(4)          16        12           (49)          (25) 

 

 
(a)

Net interest rate derivatives include derivative assets and liabilities of$1411and$57, respectively, as ofJune 30, 20172018.

(b)

Includes certain residential mortgage loans held for sale that were transferred to held for investment.

(c)

Includes interest income and expense.

(d)

Effective January 1, 2017, the Bancorp has elected the fair value measurement method for all existing classes of its residential mortgage servicing rights. The servicing rights were measured at fair value at June 30, 2017 and were measured under the amortization method at December 31, 2016.

 

  Fair Value Measurements Using Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)    Fair Value Measurements Using Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) 
 

 

 

 
For the six months ended June 30, 2016 ($ in millions) 

Residential
Mortgage

Loans

 

Interest Rate
Derivatives,

Net(a)

 

Equity

Derivatives,

Net(a)

 

Total  

Fair Value  

 
For the six months ended June 30, 2017 ($ in millions)   Residential
Mortgage
Loans
   MSRs   Interest Rate
Derivatives,
Net(a)
   

Equity

Derivatives(a)

       Total  
    Fair Value  
 

 

 

Balance, beginning of period

 $167         12            201             380       $      143           744      8           (91)          804  

Total gains (realized/unrealized):

    

Total (losses) gains (realized/unrealized):

           

Included in earnings

 3         84            16             103        1           (70)     49           (22)          (42) 

Purchases

  -         (1)            -             (1)   

Purchases/originations

    -           175      (1)          -           174  

Settlements

 (22)        (65)           11             (76)       (9)          -      (47)          15           (41) 

Transfers into Level 3(b)

 6          -             -             6        7           -      -           -            

 

 

Balance, end of period

 $154         30            228             412       $142           849      9           (98)          902  

 

 

The amount of total gains for the period included in earnings attributable to the change in unrealized gains or losses relating to assets still held at June 30, 2016(c)

 $3         34            16             53    

The amount of total (losses) gains for the period included in earnings attributable to the change in unrealized gains or losses relating to assets still held at June 30, 2017(c)

   $1           (70)     15           (22)          (76) 

 

 
(a)

Net interest rate derivatives include derivative assets and liabilities of $34$14 and $4,$5, respectively, as of June 30, 2016. Net equity derivatives include derivative assets and liabilities of $327 and $99, respectively, as of June 30, 2016.2017.

(b)

Includes certain residential mortgage loans originated as held for sale that were transferred to held for investment.

(c)

Includes interest income and expense.

The total gains and losses included in earnings for assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) were recorded in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income as follows:

 

    For the three months ended
June 30,
     

For the six months ended

June 30,

      For the three months ended
June 30,
        

For the six months ended

June 30,

 
($ in millions)            2017                   2016                             2017                   2016                         2018                 2017                            2018             2017         

Mortgage banking net revenue

 

$

  (21 44         (21 86        

$

   8       (21)           47  (21)      

Corporate banking revenue

   1   -         1  1           -        1            1  1       

Other noninterest income

    (9 (31)       (22 16           (10)      (9)           (49 (22)      

Total (losses) gains

 

$

  (29 13        (42 103       

The total gains and losses included in earnings attributable to changes in unrealized gains and losses related to Level 3 assets and liabilities still held at June 30, 2017 and 2016 were recorded in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income as follows:

 

 

Total losses

 

$

   (2)      (29)           (1 (42)      

 

The total losses included in earnings attributable to changes in unrealized gains and losses related to Level 3 assets and liabilities still held at June 30, 2018 and 2017 were recorded in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income as follows:

The total losses included in earnings attributable to changes in unrealized gains and losses related to Level 3 assets and liabilities still held at June 30, 2018 and 2017 were recorded in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income as follows:

 

    For the three months ended
June 30,
     

For the six months ended

June 30,

      For the three months ended
June 30,
        

For the six months ended

June 30,

 
($ in millions)            2017               2016                    2017               2016                    2018                 2017                        2018             2017         

Mortgage banking net revenue

 

$

  (33 34         (55 36         

$

   (2)      (33)           23  (55)       

Corporate banking revenue

   1   -         1  1            -        1            1  1        

Other noninterest income

    (9 (31)       (22 16             (10)      (9)            (49 (22)      

Total (losses) gains

 

$

  (41 3        (76 53        

Total losses

 

$

   (12)      (41)            (25 (76)      

Fifth Third Bancorp and Subsidiaries

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)

 

 

The following tables present information as of June 30, 20172018 and 20162017 about significant unobservable inputs related to the Bancorp’s material categories of Level 3 financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis:

 

 

 
As of June 30, 2017 ($ in millions)               

 

 
Financial Instrument  Fair Value   Valuation Technique  Significant Unobservable
Inputs
  Ranges of
Inputs
   Weighted- Average 

Residential mortgage loans

  $        142               Loss rate model   
Interest rate risk factor
Credit risk factor
 
 
  
(9.6) - 15.0%
0 - 46.2%
 
 
   

2.9%

1.0%

 

 

MSRs

   849               Discounted cash flow   
Prepayment speed
 
  1.2-100%    

(Fixed) 11.5%

(Adjustable) 24.8%

 

 

            OAS spread (bps)   430-1,515    
(Fixed) 530
(Adjustable) 773
 
 

IRLCs, net

   14               Discounted cash flow   Loan closing rates   9.6 - 96.8%    73.0% 
Swap associated with the sale of Visa, Inc. Class B Shares   (98)              Discounted cash flow   

Timing of the resolution

    of the Covered Litigation

 

 

  
6/30/2019 -
12/31/2022
 
 
   NM 
                       

As of June 30, 2016 ($ in millions)

              
Financial Instrument  Fair Value   Valuation Technique  Significant Unobservable
Inputs
  Ranges of
Inputs
   Weighted-Average 

Residential mortgage loans

  $154               Loss rate model   
Interest rate risk factor
Credit risk factor
 
 
  
(5.2) -16.3%
0 - 80.5%
 
 
   

5.0%

1.1%

 

 

IRLCs, net

   34               Discounted cash flow   Loan closing rates   5.3 - 94.0%    75.5% 
Stock warrant associated with Vantiv Holding, LLC   327               Black-Scholes option-
pricing model
   

Expected term (years)

Expected volatility(a)

 

 

  
2.0 - 13.0
21.6 - 27.4%
 
 
   

5.8

24.3%

 

 

Swap associated with the sale of Visa, Inc. Class B Shares   (99)              Discounted cash flow   

Timing of the resolution

    of the Covered Litigation

 

 

  
12/31/2018 -
12/31/2022
 
 
   NM 
(a)

Based on historical and implied volatilities of Vantiv, Inc. and comparable companies assuming similar expected terms.

 

 
As of June 30, 2018 ($ in millions)            

 

 
Financial Instrument  Fair Value  Valuation Technique Significant Unobservable
Inputs
 Ranges of
Inputs
   Weighted-Average 

Residential mortgage loans

  $        162       Loss rate model Interest rate risk factor  (13.3) - 11.9%    -0.1% 
         Credit risk factor  0 - 40.3%    0.7% 

MSRs

   959       Discounted cash flow Prepayment speed  0.5-97.0%    
(Fixed) 9.5%
(Adjustable) 23.6%
 
 
         OAS spread (bps)  461-1,513   

 

 

 

(Fixed) 543

(Adjustable) 817

 

 

 

IRLCs, net

   11       Discounted cash flow Loan closing rates  12.2 - 96.6%    80.9% 

Swap associated with the sale of

Visa, Inc. Class B Shares

   (164)      Discounted cash flow Timing of the resolution

    of the Covered Litigation

  
1/31/2021 -
11/30/2023
 
 
   9/6/2021 
       

 

 
As of June 30, 2017 ($ in millions)            

 

 
Financial Instrument  Fair Value  Valuation Technique Significant Unobservable
Inputs
 Ranges of
Inputs
   Weighted-Average 

Residential mortgage loans

  $        142       Loss rate model Interest rate risk factor  (9.6) - 15.0%    2.9% 
         Credit risk factor  0 - 46.2%    1.0% 

MSRs

   849       Discounted cash flow Prepayment speed  1.2-100%    
(Fixed) 11.5%
(Adjustable) 24.8%
 
 
         OAS spread (bps)  430-1,515   

 

 

 

(Fixed) 530

(Adjustable) 773

 

 

 

IRLCs, net

   14       Discounted cash flow Loan closing rates  9.6- 96.8%    73.0% 

Swap associated with the sale of

Visa, Inc. Class B Shares

   (98)      Discounted cash flow Timing of the resolution

    of the Covered Litigation

  
6/30/2019 -
12/31/2022
 
 
   9/30/2020 

Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Nonrecurring Basis

Certain assets and liabilities are measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis. These assets and liabilities are not measured at fair value on an ongoing basis; however, they are subject to fair value adjustments in certain circumstances, such as when there is evidence of impairment.

The following tables provide the fair value hierarchy and carrying amount of all assets that were held as of June 30, 20172018 and 20162017 and for which a nonrecurring fair value adjustment was recorded during the three and six months ended June 30, 20172018 and 2016,2017, and the related gains and losses from fair value adjustments on assets sold during the period as well as assets still held as of the end of the period:

 

      Fair Value Measurements Using            Total Losses             Total Losses    
As of June 30, 2017 ($ in millions)    Level 1  Level 2   Level 3       Total     

        For the three months        

ended June 30, 2017

     

        For the six months        

ended June 30, 2017

Commercial loans held for sale

 $      -      -       45         45     (13)         (32)     

Commercial and industrial loans

   -      -       405         405     (32)         (58)     

Commercial mortgage loans

   -      -       26         26     (9)         (11)     

Commercial leases

   -      -       3             (1)         (2)     

OREO

   -      -       11         11     (1)         (5)     

Bank premises and equipment

   -      -       16         16     (2)         (5)     

Operating lease equipment

    -      -       56         56     -           (20)     

Total

 

$

  -      -       562         562     (58)          (133)     
                                 
      Fair Value Measurements Using        Total (Losses) Gains     Total (Losses) Gains
            For the three months    For the six months
As of June 30, 2016 ($ in millions)    Level 1  Level 2   Level 3   Total     ended June 30, 2016     ended June 30, 2016

Commercial loans held for sale

 $      -      -       20         20     (5)         (7)     

Commercial and industrial loans

   -      -       426         426     (19)         (66)     

Commercial mortgage loans

   -      -       67         67     (7)         (1)     

Commercial construction loans

   -      -       -             -         2      

Commercial leases

   -      -       3             (1)         (1)     

MSRs(a)

   -      -       621         621     (45)         (131)     

OREO

   -      -       38         38     (6)         (9)     

Bank premises and equipment

   -      -       20��        20     2          2      

Operating lease equipment

    -      -       38         38     (5)          (5)     

Total

 

$

  -      -       1,233         1,233     (86)          (216)     
(a)

Effective January 1, 2017, the Bancorp has elected the fair value measurement method for all existing classes of its residential mortgage servicing rights. The servicing rights were measured at fair value at June 30, 2017 and were measured under the amortization method at June 30, 2016.
       Fair Value Measurements Using           Total (Losses) Gains              Total (Losses) Gains     
As of June 30, 2018 ($ in millions)     Level 1  Level 2   Level 3       Total   

        For the three months        

ended June 30, 2018

      

        For the six months        

ended June 30, 2018

 

Commercial loans held for sale

  $       -      -       4               -         (1)     

Commercial and industrial loans

   -      -       161            161    14         (30)     

Commercial mortgage loans

   -      -       3               1         6      

Commercial leases

   -      -       14            14    (9)        (10)     

OREO

   -      -       17            17    (1)        (4)     

Bank premises and equipment

   -      -       37            37    (33)        (41)     

Operating lease equipment

   -      -       10            10    (1)        (3)     

Private equity investments

      -      50       31            81    11            30      

Total

  $   -      50       277            327    (18)           (53)     
          
       Fair Value Measurements Using       Total Losses      Total Losses 
As of June 30, 2017 ($ in millions)     Level 1  Level 2   Level 3       Total    

        For the three months        

ended June 30, 2017

              For the six months        
ended June 30, 2017
 

Commercial loans held for sale

  $       -      -       45            45    (13)        (32)     

Commercial and industrial loans

   -      -       405            405    (32)        (58)     

Commercial mortgage loans

   -      -       26            26    (9)        (11)     

Commercial leases

   -      -       3               (1)        (2)     

OREO

   -      -       11            11    (1)        (5)     

Bank premises and equipment

   -      -       16            16    (2)        (5)     

Operating lease equipment

      -      -       56            56    -            (20)     

Total

  $   -      -       562            562    (58)           (133)     

Fifth Third Bancorp and Subsidiaries

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)

 

 

The following tables present information as of June 30, 20172018 and 20162017 about significant unobservable inputs related to the Bancorp’s material categories of Level 3 financial assets and liabilities measured on a nonrecurring basis:

 

As of June 30, 2017 ($ in millions)
Financial Instrument    Fair Value    Valuation Technique    Significant Unobservable
    Inputs
    Ranges of 
    Inputs 
    Weighted-Average    

Commercial loans held for sale

$            45     Appraised valueAppraised valueNMNM

Commercial and industrial loans

405    Appraised valueCollateral valueNMNM

Commercial mortgage loans

26     Appraised valueCollateral valueNMNM

Commercial leases

3      Appraised valueCollateral valueNMNM

OREO

11     Appraised valueAppraised valueNMNM

Bank premises and equipment

16     Appraised valueAppraised valueNMNM

Operating lease equipment

56     Appraised valueAppraised valueNMNM
As of June 30, 2016 ($ in millions)
Financial Instrument    Fair Value    Valuation Technique    Significant Unobservable
    Inputs
    Ranges of 
    Inputs
    Weighted-Average    

Commercial loans held for sale

$            20     Appraised value
Appraised Value
Costs to sell

NM

NM

NM

10.0%

Commercial and industrial loans

426    Appraised valueCollateral valueNMNM

Commercial mortgage loans

67     Appraised valueCollateral valueNMNM

Commercial construction loans

-      Appraised valueCollateral valueNMNM

Commercial leases

3      Appraised valueCollateral valueNMNM

MSRs

621    Discounted cash flowPrepayment speed0-100%

(Fixed) 15.0%

(Adjustable) 26.9%

OAS spread (bps)404-1,515

(Fixed) 648

(Adjustable) 762

OREO

38     Appraised valueAppraised valueNMNM

Bank premises and equipment

20     Appraised valueAppraised valueNMNM

Operating lease equipment

38     Appraised valueAppraised valueNMNM
As of June 30, 2018 ($ in millions)     
Financial Instrument     Fair Value      Valuation Technique Significant Unobservable Inputs   Ranges of 
    Inputs 
    Weighted-Average     

Commercial loans held for sale

 $            4       Appraised value Appraised value  NM   NM 
        Costs to sell  NM   10.0% 

Commercial and industrial loans

  161       Appraised value Collateral value  NM   NM 

Commercial mortgage loans

  3       Appraised value Collateral value  NM   NM 

Commercial leases

  14       Appraised value Collateral value  NM   NM 

OREO

  17       Appraised value Appraised value  NM   NM 

Bank premises and equipment

  37       Appraised value Appraised value  NM   NM 

Operating lease equipment

  10       Appraised value Appraised value  NM   NM 

Private equity investments

  28       Liquidity discount applied
to fund’s net asset value
 Liquidity discount  0-43.0%   12.9% 
   3       Comparable company analysis Market comparable transactions  NM   NM 
                 

As of June 30, 2017 ($ in millions)

 

    
Financial Instrument     Fair Value      Valuation Technique Significant Unobservable Inputs   Ranges of 
    Inputs 
    Weighted-Average     

Commercial loans held for sale

 $45       Appraised value Appraised value  NM   NM 
        Costs to sell  NM   10.0% 

Commercial and industrial loans

  405       Appraised value Collateral value  NM   NM 

Commercial mortgage loans

  26       Appraised value Collateral value  NM   NM 

Commercial leases

  3       Appraised value Collateral value  NM   NM 

OREO

  11       Appraised value Appraised value  NM   NM 

Bank premises and equipment

  16       Appraised value Appraised value  NM   NM 

Operating lease equipment

  56       Appraised value Appraised value  NM   NM 

Commercial loans held for sale

During the three and six months ended June 30, 2018, the Bancorp transferred an immaterial amount and $1 million, respectively, of commercial loans from the portfolio to loans held for sale that upon transfer were measured at lower of cost or fair value. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2017, the Bancorp transferred $57 million and $75 million, respectively, of commercial loans from the portfolio to loans held for sale that upon transfer were measured at lower of cost or fair value. DuringThese loans had an immaterial amount of fair value adjustments during the three and six months ended June 30, 2016, the Bancorp transferred $20 million2018 and $25 million, respectively, of commercial loans from the portfolio to loans held for sale that upon transfer were measured at lower of cost or fair value. There were $13 million and $30 million of fair value adjustments forduring the three and six months ended June 30, 2017, respectively. There were $5 million of fair value adjustments for both the three and six months ended June 30, 2016. The fair value adjustments were generally based on appraisals of the underlying collateral or were estimated by discounting future cash flows using the current market rates of loans to borrowers with similar credit characteristics, similar remaining maturities, prepayment speeds and loss severities and were, therefore, classified within Level 3 of the valuation hierarchy. Additionally, fair value adjustments on existing loans held for sale were immaterial for both the three months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017 and $1 million and immaterial for the six months ended June 30, 20172018 and 2016,2017, respectively. The fair value adjustments were also based on appraisals of the underlying collateral. The Bancorp recognized an immaterial amount of gains and losses on the sale of commercial loans held for sale during both the three and six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016.2018. The Bancorp recognized an immaterial amount of losses and $2 million in losses on the sale of commercial loans held for sale for both the three and six months ended June 30, 2017, and 2016.respectively.

The Accounting department determines the procedures for the valuation of commercial loans held for sale using appraised value which may include a comparison to recently executed transactions of similar type loans. A monthly review of the portfolio is performed for reasonableness. Quarterly, appraisals approaching a year old are updated and the Real Estate Valuation group, which reports to the Bancorp’s Chief Risk Officer, in conjunction with the Commercial Line of Business, reviewreviews the third party appraisals for reasonableness. Additionally, the Commercial Line of Business Finance department, which reports to the Bancorp’s Chief Financial Officer, in conjunction with the Accounting department reviews all loan appraisal values, carry values and vintages. The Treasury department, which reports to the Bancorp’s Chief Financial Officer, is responsible for the estimate of fair value adjustments when a discounted future cash flow valuation technique is employed.

Commercial loans held for investment

During the three and six months ended June 30, 20172018 and 2016,2017, the Bancorp recorded nonrecurring impairment adjustments to certain commercial and industrial loans, commercial mortgage loans, commercial construction loans and commercial leases held for investment. Larger commercial loans included within aggregate borrower relationship balances exceeding $1 million that exhibit probable or observed credit weaknesses are subject to individual review for impairment. The Bancorp considers the current value of collateral, credit quality of any guarantees, the guarantor’s liquidity and willingness to cooperate, the loan structure and other factors when evaluating whether an individual loan is impaired. When the loan is collateral dependent, the fair value of the loan is generally based on the fair value of the underlying collateral supporting the loan and therefore these loans were classified within Level 3 of the valuation hierarchy. In cases where the carrying value exceeds the fair value, an impairment loss is recognized. The fair values and recognized impairment losses are reflected in the previous tables. Commercial Credit Risk, which reports to the Bancorp’s Chief Risk Officer, is responsible for preparing and reviewing the fair value estimates for commercial loans held for investment.

Fifth Third Bancorp and Subsidiaries

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)

 

 

MSRs

Effective January 1, 2017, the Bancorp elected the fair value measurement method for all existing classes of its residential mortgage servicing rights. The servicing rights were measured at fair value at June 30, 2017 and under the amortization method at December 31, 2016. Mortgage interest rates decreased during the six months ended June 30, 2016 and the Bancorp recognized temporary impairment in certain classes of the MSR portfolio and the carrying value was adjusted to the fair value. Refer to the MSRs section of the Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis discussion for additional information.

OREO

During the three and six months ended June 30, 20172018 and 2016,2017, the Bancorp recorded nonrecurring adjustments to certain commercial and residential real estate properties classified as OREO and measured at the lower of carrying amount or fair value. These nonrecurring losses were primarily due to declines in real estate values of the properties recorded in OREO. These losses included $1 million and $3$2 million in losses, recorded as charge-offs on new OREO properties transferred from loans during the three and six months ended June 30, 2017,2018, respectively, and $3$1 million and $5$3 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2016,2017, respectively. These losses also included an immaterial amount of losses and $2 million in losses for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017,2018, respectively, and $3 millionan immaterial amount of losses and $4$2 million in losses for the three and six months ended June 30, 2016,2017, respectively, recorded as negative fair value adjustments on OREO in other noninterest expense in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income subsequent to their transfer from loans. As discussed in the following paragraphs, the fair value amounts are generally based on appraisals of the property values, resulting in a classification within Level 3 of the valuation hierarchy. In cases where the carrying amount exceeds the fair value, less costs to sell, an impairment loss is recognized. The previous tables reflect the fair value measurements of the properties before deducting the estimated costs to sell.

The Real Estate Valuation department is solely responsible for managing the appraisal process and evaluating the appraisal for commercial properties transferred to OREO. All appraisals on commercial OREO properties are updated on at least an annual basis.

The Real Estate Valuation department reviews the BPO data and internal market information to determine the initialcharge-off on residential real estate loans transferred to OREO. Once the foreclosure process is completed, the Bancorp performs an interior inspection to update the initial fair value of the property. These properties are reviewed at least every 30 days after the initial interior inspections are completed. The Asset Manager receives a monthly status report for each property which includes the number of showings, recently sold properties, current comparable listings and overall market conditions.

Bank premises and equipment

The Bancorp performs assessments of the recoverability of long-lived assets when events or changes in circumstances indicate that their carrying values may not be recoverable. These properties were written down to their lower of cost or market values. At least annually thereafter, the Bancorp will review these properties for market fluctuations. The fair value amounts were generally based on appraisals of the property values, resulting in a classification within Level 3 of the valuation hierarchy. Corporate Facilities, which reports to the Bancorp’s Chief Administrative Officer, in conjunction with Accounting, are responsible for preparing and reviewing the fair value estimates for bank premises and equipment. For further information on bank premises and equipment and discussion on changes to the branch network, refer to Note 7.

Operating lease equipment

During both the three and six months ended June 30, 20172018 and 2016,2017, the Bancorp recorded nonrecurring impairment adjustments to certain operating lease equipment. When evaluating whether an individual asset is impaired, the Bancorp considers the current fair value of the asset, the changes in overall market demand for the asset and the rate of change in advancements associated with technological improvements that impact the demand for the specific asset under review. As part of this ongoing assessment, the Bancorp determined that the carrying values of certain operating lease equipment were not recoverable and as a result, the Bancorp recorded an impairment loss equal to the amount by which the carrying value of the assets exceeded the fair value. The fair value amounts were generally based on appraised values of the assets, resulting in a classification within Level 3 of the valuation hierarchy. The Bancorp recorded net losses of $1 million and $3 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2018, respectively, and net losses of an immaterial amount and $20 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017, respectively, and net losses of $5 million for both the three and six months ended June 30, 2016 as a reduction to corporate banking revenue in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income. The Commercial Leasing department, which reports to the Bancorp’s Chief Operating Officer, is responsible for preparing and reviewing the fair value estimates for operating lease equipment. Refer

Private equity investments

As a result of adopting ASU2016-01, effective January 1, 2018, the Bancorp accounts for its private equity investments using the measurement alternative to Note 8fair value, except for further informationthose accounted for under the equity method of accounting. Under the measurement alternative, the Bancorp carries each investment at its cost basis minus impairment, if any, plus or minus changes resulting from observable price changes in orderly transactions for identical or similar investments of the same issuer. The Bancorp recognized gains of $16 million and $51 million resulting from observable price changes during the three and six months ended June 30, 2018, respectively. The carrying value of the Bancorp’s private equity investments as of June 30, 2018 includes a cumulative $35 million of positive adjustments as a result of observable price changes. Because these adjustments are based on observable transactions in inactive markets, they are classified in Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.

For private equity investments which are accounted for using the measurement alternative to fair value, the Bancorp qualitatively evaluates each investment quarterly to determine if impairment may exist. If necessary, the Bancorp then measures impairment by estimating the value of its investment and comparing that to the investment’s carrying value, whether or not the Bancorp considers the impairment to be temporary. These valuations are typically developed using a discounted cash flow method, but other methods may be used if more appropriate for the circumstances. These valuations are based on unobservable inputs and therefore are classified in Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy. The Bancorp recognized impairments of $1 million and $11 million during the three and six months ended June 30, 2018, respectively. The carrying value of the Bancorp’s private equity investments as of June 30, 2018 includes a cumulative $11 million of impairment charges relatedrecognized since adoption of the measurement alternative to fair value on January 1, 2018.

The Bancorp recognized $4 million and $10 million of OTTI primarily associated with certain operating lease equipment.nonconforming investments affected by the Volcker Rule during the three and six months ended June 30, 2018, respectively. The Bancorp performed nonrecurring fair value measurements on a fund by fund basis to determine whether OTTI existed. The Bancorp estimated the fair value of the funds by applying an estimated market discount to the reported net asset value of the fund or through a discounted cash flow analysis. Because the length of time until the investment will become redeemable is generally not certain, these funds were classified within Level 3 of the valuation hierarchy. An adverse change in the reported net asset values or estimated market discounts, where applicable, would result in a decrease in the fair value estimate. In cases where the carrying value exceeds the fair value, an impairment loss is recognized. The Bancorp’s Private Equity department, which reports to the Head of Payments, Strategy and Digital Solutions, in conjunction with Accounting, is responsible for preparing and reviewing the fair value estimates.

Fifth Third Bancorp and Subsidiaries

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)

Fair Value Option

The Bancorp elected to measure certain residential mortgage and commercial loans held for sale under the fair value option as allowed under U.S. GAAP. Electing to measure residential mortgage loans held for sale at fair value reduces certain timing differences and better matches changes in the value of these assets with changes in the value of derivatives used as economic hedges for these assets. Electing to measure certain commercial loans held for sale at fair value reduces certain timing differences and better reflects changes in fair value of these assets that are expected to be sold in the short term. Management’s intent to sell residential mortgage or commercial loans classified as held for sale may change over time due to such factors as changes in the overall liquidity in markets or changes in characteristics specific to certain loans held for sale. Consequently, these loans may be reclassified to loans held for investment and maintained in the Bancorp’s loan portfolio. In such cases, the loans will continue to be measured at fair value.

Fair value changes recognized in earnings for instrumentsresidential mortgage loans held at June 30, 20172018 and 20162017 for which the fair value option was elected, as well as the changes in fair value of the underlying IRLCs, included gains of $26$18 million and $45$26 million for the six months ended June 30, 20172018 and 2016,2017, respectively. These gains are reported in mortgage banking net revenue in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income.

Fifth Third Fair value changes recognized in earnings for commercial loans held at June 30, 2018 for which the fair value option was elected included gains of an immaterial amount for both the three and six months ended June 30, 2018. The Bancorp and Subsidiaries

Notes todid not hold any commercial loans held for sale during the six months ended June 30, 2017. These gains are reported in corporate banking revenue in the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)

of Income.

Valuation adjustments related to instrument-specific credit risk for residential mortgage loans measured at fair value negatively impacted the fair value of those loans by $1 million and $2 million at June 30, 20172018 and December 31, 2016,2017, respectively. Valuation adjustments related to instrument-specific credit risk for commercial loans measured at fair value had an immaterial impact on the fair value of those loans at June 30, 2018. The Bancorp did not hold any commercial loans held for sale at December 31, 2017. Interest on residential mortgage loans measured at fair value is accrued as it is earned using the effective interest method and is reported as interest income in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income.

The following table summarizes the difference between the fair value and the unpaid principal balance for residential mortgage and commercial loans measured at fair value as of:

 

($ in millions)  

Aggregate

Fair Value

   Aggregate Unpaid
Principal Balance
         Difference      

June 30, 2017

      
June 30, 2018 ($ in millions)  Aggregate
Fair Value
   Aggregate Unpaid
Principal Balance
         Difference      

Residential mortgage loans measured at fair value

  $                        816    790   26   $                        820    802   18

Past due loans of 90 days or more

   2    2      2    2   -

Nonaccrual loans

   1    1      1    1   -

December 31, 2016

      

Commercial loans measured at fair value

   8    8   -

December 31, 2017

         

Residential mortgage loans measured at fair value

  $829    823     $536    522   14

Past due loans of 90 days or more

   2    2      5    5   -

Nonaccrual loans

   1    1      1    1   -

Fifth Third Bancorp and Subsidiaries

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)

Fair Value of Certain Financial Instruments

The following tables summarize the carrying amounts and estimated fair values for certain financial instruments, excluding financial instruments measured at fair value on a recurring basis:

 

  

Net Carrying

Amount

  Fair Value Measurements Using   

Total    

Fair Value    

  

    Net Carrying    

Amount

  Fair Value Measurements Using   

Total    

Fair Value    

As of June 30, 2017 ($ in millions)   Level 1   Level 2   Level 3   
As of June 30, 2018 ($ in millions)  

    Net Carrying    

Amount

  Level 1   Level 2   Level 3   

Total    

Fair Value    

Financial assets:

                      

Cash and due from banks

  $                      2,203   2,203    -    -   2,203    $2,052   2,052    -    -   2,052  

Other short-term investments

   1,636   1,636    -    -   1,636  

Other securities

   610   -    610    -   610     614   -    614    -   614  

Held-to-maturity securities

   26   -    -    26   26     19   -    -    19   19  

Other short-term investments

   2,163   2,163    -    -   2,163  

Loans held for sale

   92   -    -    94   94  

Loans and leases held for sale

   117   -    -    117   117  

Portfolio loans and leases:

                  

Commercial and industrial loans

   40,215   -    -    41,425   41,425     40,858   -    -    41,825   41,825  

Commercial mortgage loans

   6,781   -    -    6,729   6,729     6,560   -    -    6,493   6,493  

Commercial construction loans

   4,349   -    -    4,349   4,349     4,666   -    -    4,710   4,710  

Commercial leases

   4,143   -    -    3,885   3,885     3,765   -    -    3,355   3,355  

Residential mortgage loans

   15,225   -    -    15,921   15,921     15,392   -    -    15,697   15,697  

Home equity

   7,250   -    -    7,757   7,757     6,560   -    -    6,936   6,936  

Automobile loans

   9,277   -    -    9,023   9,023     8,899   -    -    8,632   8,632  

Credit card

   2,018   -    -    2,374   2,374     2,146   -    -    2,518   2,518  

Other consumer loans and leases

   930   -    -    977   977  

Other consumer loans

   1,955   -    -    2,047   2,047  

Unallocated ALLL

   (110  -    -    -   -     (108  -    -    -   -  

Total portfolio loans and leases, net

  $90,078   -    -    92,440   92,440    $90,693   -    -    92,213   92,213  

Financial liabilities:

                  

Deposits

  $                      101,880   -    101,855    -   101,855    $104,131   -    104,064    -   104,064  

Federal funds purchased

   117   117    -    -   117     597   597    -    -   597  

Other short-term borrowings

   5,389   -    5,389    -   5,389     1,763   -    1,763    -   1,763  

Long-term debt

   13,456   13,565    564    -   14,129     14,321   14,223    429    -   14,652  

  

Net Carrying

Amount

  Fair Value Measurements Using   

Total    

Fair Value    

As of December 31, 2017 ($ in millions) Level 1   Level 2   Level 3 

Financial assets:

              

Cash and due from banks

  $2,514  2,514    -    -   2,514  

Other short-term investments

   2,753  2,753    -    -   2,753  

Other securities

   612   -    612    -   612  

Held-to-maturity securities

   24   -    -    24   24  

Loans and leases held for sale

   93   -    -    93   93  

Portfolio loans and leases:

         

Commercial and industrial loans

   40,519   -    -    41,718   41,718  

Commercial mortgage loans

   6,539   -    -    6,490   6,490  

Commercial construction loans

   4,530   -    -    4,560   4,560  

Commercial leases

   4,054   -    -    3,705   3,705  

Residential mortgage loans

   15,365   -    -    15,996   15,996  

Home equity

   6,968   -    -    7,410   7,410  

Automobile loans

   9,074   -    -    8,832   8,832  

Credit card

   2,182   -    -    2,616   2,616  

Other consumer loans

   1,526   -    -    1,621   1,621  

Unallocated ALLL

   (120  -    -    -   -  

Total portfolio loans and leases, net

  $90,637   -    -    92,948   92,948  

Financial liabilities:

         

Deposits

  $103,162   -    103,123    -   103,123  

Federal funds purchased

   174  174    -    -   174  

Other short-term borrowings

   4,012   -    4,012    -   4,012  

Long-term debt

   14,904  15,045    529    -   15,574  

Fifth Third Bancorp and Subsidiaries

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)

 

   

Net Carrying

Amount

  Fair Value Measurements Using   

Total    

Fair Value    

As of December 31, 2016 ($ in millions)   Level 1   Level 2   Level 3   

Financial assets:

                      

Cash and due from banks

  $2,392   2,392    -    -   2,392  

Other securities

   607   -    607    -   607  

Held-to-maturity securities

   26   -    -    26   26  

Other short-term investments

   2,754   2,754    -    -   2,754  

Loans held for sale

   65   -    -    65   65  

Portfolio loans and leases:

         

Commercial and industrial loans

   40,958   -    -    41,976   41,976  

Commercial mortgage loans

   6,817   -    -    6,735   6,735  

Commercial construction loans

   3,887   -    -    3,853   3,853  

Commercial leases

   3,959   -    -    3,651   3,651  

Residential mortgage loans

   14,812   -    -    15,415   15,415  

Home equity

   7,637   -    -    8,421   8,421  

Automobile loans

   9,941   -    -    9,640   9,640  

Credit card

   2,135   -    -    2,503   2,503  

Other consumer loans and leases

   668   -    -    678   678  

Unallocated ALLL

   (112  -    -    -   -  

Total portfolio loans and leases, net

  $90,702   -    -    92,872   92,872  

Financial liabilities:

         

Deposits

  $103,821   -    103,811    -   103,811  

Federal funds purchased

   132   132    -    -   132  

Other short-term borrowings

   3,535   -    3,535    -   3,535  

Long-term debt

   14,388   14,288    545    -   14,833  

Cash and due from banks, other securities, other short-term investments, deposits, federal funds purchased and other short-term borrowings

For financial instruments with a short-term or no stated maturity, prevailing market rates and limited credit risk, carrying amounts approximate fair value. Those financial instruments include cash and due from banks, other securities consisting of FHLB, FRB and DTCC restricted stock, other short-term investments, certain deposits (demand, interest checking, savings, money market, foreign office deposits and other deposits), federal funds purchased, and other short-term borrowings excluding FHLB borrowings. Fair values for other time deposits, certificates of deposit $100,000 and over and FHLB borrowings were estimated using a DCF calculation that applies prevailing LIBOR/swap interest rates and a spread for new issuances with similar terms.

Held-to-maturity securities

The Bancorp’sheld-to-maturity securities are primarily composed of instruments that provide income tax credits as the economic return on the investment. The fair value of these instruments is estimated based on current U.S. Treasury tax credit rates.

Loans held for sale

Fair values for commercial loans held for sale were valued based on executable bids when available, or on DCF models incorporating appraisals of the underlying collateral, as well as assumptions about investor return requirements and amounts and timing of expected cash flows. Fair values for residential mortgage loans held for sale were valued based on estimated third-party valuations utilizing recent sales data from similar transactions. Broker opinion statements were also obtained as additional evidence to support the third-party valuations. Fair values for other consumer loans held for sale were based on contractual values upon which the loans may be sold to a third party, and approximate their carrying value.

Portfolio loans and leases, net

Fair values were estimated based on either appraisals of the underlying collateral or by discounting future cash flows using the current market rates of loans to borrowers with similar credit characteristics, similar remaining maturities, prepayment speeds and loss severities. The Bancorp estimates fair values at the transaction level whenever possible. For certain products with a large number of homogenous transactions, the Bancorp employs a pool approach. This approach involves stratifying and sorting the entire population of transactions into a smaller number of pools with like characteristics. Characteristics may include maturity date, coupon, origination date and principal amortization method.

Long-term debt

Fair value of long-term debt was based on quoted market prices, when available, or a DCF calculation using LIBOR/swap interest rates and, in some cases, Fifth Third credit and/or debt instrument spreads for new issuances with similar terms.

Fifth Third Bancorp and Subsidiaries

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)

 

22. Business Segments

The Bancorp reports on four business segments: Commercial Banking, Branch Banking, Consumer Lending and Wealth and Asset Management. Results of the Bancorp’s business segments are presented based on its management structure and management accounting practices. The structure and accounting practices are specific to the Bancorp; therefore, the financial results of the Bancorp’s business segments are not necessarily comparable with similar information for other financial institutions. The Bancorp refines its methodologies from time to time as management’s accounting practices and businesses change.

The Bancorp manages interest rate risk centrally at the corporate level. By employing an FTP methodology, the business segments are insulated from most benchmark interest rate volatility, enabling them to focus on serving customers through the origination of loans and acceptance of deposits. The FTP methodology assigns charge rates and credit rates to classes of assets and liabilities, respectively, based on the estimated amount and timing of the cash flows for each transaction. Assigning the FTP rate based on matching the duration of cash flows allocates interest income and interest expense to each business segment so its resulting net interest income is insulated from future changes in benchmark interest rates. The Bancorp’s FTP methodology also allocates the contribution to net interest income of the asset-generating and deposit-providing businesses on a duration-adjusted basis to better attribute the driver of the performance. As the asset and liability durations are not perfectly matched, the residual impact of the FTP methodology is captured in General Corporate and Other. The charge and credit rates are determined using the FTP rate curve, which is based on an estimate of Fifth Third’s marginal borrowing cost in the wholesale funding markets. The FTP curve is constructed using the U.S. swap curve, brokered CD pricing and unsecured debt pricing.

The Bancorp adjusts the FTP charge and credit rates as dictated by changes in interest rates for various interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities and by the review of behavioral assumptions, such as prepayment rates on interest-earning assets and the estimated durations for indeterminate-lived deposits. Key assumptions, including the credit rates provided for deposit accounts, are reviewed annually. Credit rates for deposit products and charge rates for loan products may be reset more frequently in response to changes in market conditions. The credit rates for several deposit products were reset January 1,20171,2018 to reflect the current market rates and updated market assumptions. These rates were generally higher than those in place during 2016,2017, thus net interest income for deposit-providing business segments was positively impacted during 2017.2018. FTP charge rates on assets were affected by the prevailing level of interest rates and by the duration and repricing characteristics of the portfolio. As overall market rates increased, the FTP charge increased for asset-generating business segments during 2017.2018.

The Bancorp’s methodology for allocating provision for loan and lease losses expense to the business segments includes charges or benefits associated with changes in criticized commercial loan levels in addition to actual net charge-offs experienced by the loans and leases owned by each business segment. Provision for loan and lease losses expense attributable to loan and lease growth and changes in ALLL factors is captured in General Corporate and Other. The financial results of the business segments include allocations for shared services and headquarters expenses. Additionally, the business segments form synergies by taking advantage of cross-sell opportunities and when funding operations by accessing the capital markets as a collective unit.

The results of operations and financial position for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017 were adjusted to reflect changes in internal expense allocation methodologies.

The following is a description of each of the Bancorp’s business segments and the products and services they provide to their respective client bases.

Commercial Bankingoffers credit intermediation, cash management and financial services to large and middle-market businesses and government and professional customers. In addition to the traditional lending and depository offerings, Commercial Banking products and services include global cash management, foreign exchange and international trade finance, derivatives and capital markets services, asset-based lending, real estate finance, public finance, commercial leasing and syndicated finance.

Branch Banking provides a full range of deposit and loan and lease products to individuals and small businesses through 1,1571,158 full-service banking centers. Branch Banking offers depository and loan products, such as checking and savings accounts, home equity loans and lines of credit, credit cards and loans for automobiles and other personal financing needs, as well as products designed to meet the specific needs of small businesses, including cash management services.

Consumer Lendingincludes the Bancorp’s residential mortgage, home equity, automobile and other indirect lending activities. Direct lending activities include the origination, retention and servicing of residential mortgage and home equity loans or lines of credit, sales and securitizations of those loans, pools of loans or lines of credit and all associated hedging activities. Indirect lending activities include extending loans to consumers through correspondent lenders and automobile dealers.

Wealth and Asset Management provides a full range of investment alternatives for individuals, companies andnot-for-profit organizations. Wealth and Asset Management is made up of fourfive main businesses: FTS, an indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of the Bancorp; ClearArc Capital, Inc., an indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of the Bancorp; Fifth Third Insurance Agency, Inc., an indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of the Bancorp; Fifth Third Private Bank; and Fifth Third Institutional Services. FTS offers full service retail brokerage services to individual clients and broker dealerbroker-dealer services to the institutional marketplace. ClearArc Capital, Inc. provides asset management services. Fifth Third Insurance Agency, Inc. assists clients with their financial and risk management needs. Fifth Third Private Bank offers holistic strategies to affluent clients in wealth planning, investing, insurance and wealth protection. Fifth Third Institutional Services provides advisory services for institutional clients including states and municipalities.

Fifth Third Bancorp and Subsidiaries

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)

 

 

The following tables present the results of operations and assets by business segment for the three months ended:

 

June 30, 2017 ($ in millions)     Commercial
    Banking
  Branch
Banking
  Consumer
Lending
  Wealth 
and Asset 
Management 
  General
Corporate
and Other
  Eliminations  Total

Net interest income

 $415   437   59   37   (9    939 

Provision for (benefit from) loan and lease losses

  22   39   7   (1  (15    52 

Net interest income after provision for loan and lease losses

  393   398   52   38   6     887 

Total noninterest income

  228   189(b)   62   101   17   (33)(a)  564 

Total noninterest expense

  345   399   123   110   13   (33 957 

Income (loss) before income taxes

  276   188   (9  29   10     494 

Applicable income tax expense (benefit)

  49   66   (3  10   5     127 

Net income (loss)

  227   122   (6  19   5     367 

Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests

  -   -   -   -   -     

Net income (loss) attributable to Bancorp

  227   122   (6  19   5     367 

Dividends on preferred stock

  -   -   -   -   23     23 

Net income (loss) available to common shareholders

 $227   122   (6  19   (18    344 

Total goodwill

 $613   1,655   -   155   -     2,423 

Total assets

 $57,766   57,378   22,442   8,241   (4,760)(c)     141,067 
(a)

Revenue sharing agreements between wealth and asset management and branch banking are eliminated in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income.

(b)

Includes impairment charges of$2for branches and land. For more information refer to Note 7 and Note 21.

(c)

Includes bank premises and equipment of$41 classified as held for sale. For more information refer to Note 7.

June 30, 2016 ($ in millions)     Commercial
    Banking
  Branch  
Banking  
  Consumer
Lending
  Wealth
and Asset
Management
  General
Corporate
and Other(e)
  Eliminations  Total(e)

Net interest income

 $460   433   62   44   (97    902 

Provision for loan and lease losses

  72   35   9   1   (26    91 

Net interest income after provision for loan and lease losses

  388   398   53   43   (71    811 

Total noninterest income

  236(c)   214(b)   80   100   3   (34)(a)  599 

Total noninterest expense

  355   409   122   108   23   (34)  983 

Income (loss) before income taxes

  269   203   11   35   (91    427 

Applicable income tax expense

  43   71   4   12   (27    103 

Net income (loss)

  226   132   7   23   (64    324 

Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests

  -   -   -   -   (4    (4)

Net income (loss) attributable to Bancorp

  226   132   7   23   (60    328 

Dividends on preferred stock

  -   -   -   -   23     23 

Net income (loss) available to common shareholders

 $226   132   7   23   (83    305 

Total goodwill

 $613   1,655   -   148   -     2,416 

Total assets

 $60,042   54,220   22,598   8,399   (1,634)(d)     143,625 
(a)

Revenue sharing agreements between wealth and asset management and branch banking are eliminated in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income.

(b)

Includes impairment charges of $1 for branches and land. For more information refer to Note 7 and Note 21.

(c)

Includes impairment charges of $5 for operating lease equipment. For more information refer to Note 8 and Note 21.

(d)

Includes bank premises and equipment of $52 classified as held for sale. For more information refer to Note 7.

(e)

A net tax deficiency of $5 was reclassified from capital surplus to applicable income tax expense for the three months ended June 30, 2016, related to the early adoption of ASU2016-09 during the fourth quarter of 2016, with an effective date of January 1, 2016.

Fifth Third Bancorp and Subsidiaries

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)

The following tables present the results of operations and assets by business segment for the six months ended:

June 30, 2017 ($ in millions)     Commercial
    Banking
 Branch
Banking
 Consumer
Lending
 Wealth 
and Asset 
Management 
 General
Corporate
and Other
 Eliminations Total
June 30, 2018 ($ in millions)  Commercial
Banking
 Branch  
Banking  
 Consumer
Lending
 

Wealth

and Asset
Management

 General
Corporate
and Other
 Eliminations Total 

Net interest income

 $839   867   120   75   (29    1,872   $427   499   59   45   (10     1,020 

Provision for loan and lease losses

  29   80   22   3   (8    126 

Provision for (benefit from) loan and lease losses

   (10  47   8   (11  (1     33 

Net interest income after provision for loan and lease losses

  810   787   98   72   (21    1,746    437   452   51   56   (9     987 

Noninterest income:

        

Service charges on deposits

   70   67   -   -   -      137 

Wealth and asset management revenue

   1   37   -   104   -   (34)(a)   108 

Corporate banking revenue

   119   1   -   -   -      120 

Card and processing revenue

   14   69   -   1   -      84 

Mortgage banking net revenue

   -   1   52   -   -      53 

Other noninterest income(b)

   25   (8  4   4   225      250 

Securities losses, net

   -   -   -   -   (5     (5

Securities losses, net -non-qualifying hedges on MSRs

   -   -   (4  -   -      (4

Total noninterest income

  429(c)   374(b)   116   209   26   (67)(a)  1,087    229   167   52   109   220   (34  743 

Noninterest expense:

        

Salaries, wages and incentives

   71   111   42   43   204      471 

Employee benefits

   9   26   10   7   26      78 

Net occupancy expense

   6   44   3   3   18      74 

Technology and communications

   2   1   1   -   63      67 

Equipment expense

   6   12   -   -   12      30 

Card and processing expense

   1   30   -   -   (1     30 

Other noninterest expense

   263   208   51   70   (271  (34  287 

Total noninterest expense

  714   801   241   224   30   (67 1,943    358   432   107   123   51   (34  1,037 

Income (loss) before income taxes

  525   360   (27  57   (25    890    308   187   (4  42   160      693 

Applicable income tax expense (benefit)

  88   127   (10  20   (7    218    19   40   (1  9   40      107 

Net income (loss)

  437   233   (17  37   (18    672    289   147   (3  33   120      586 

Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests

  -   -   -   -   -     

Net income (loss) attributable to Bancorp

  437   233   (17  37   (18    672 

Dividends on preferred stock

  -   -   -   -   38     38 

Net income (loss) available to common shareholders

 $437   233   (17  37   (56    634 

Total goodwill

 $613   1,655   -   155   -     2,423   $630   1,655   -   177   -      2,462 

Total assets

 $57,766   57,378   22,442   8,241   (4,760)(d)     141,067   $          58,763   60,281   22,128   9,270   (9,747)(c)       140,695 
(a)

Revenue sharing agreements between wealth and asset management and branch banking are eliminated in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income.

(b)

Includes impairment charges of$533for branches and land. For more information refer to Note 7 and Note 21.

(c)

Includes impairment charges of$31 for operating lease equipment. For more information refer to Note 8 and Note 21.

(d)

Includes bank premises and equipment of$4137 classified as held for sale. For more information refer to Note 7.

 

June 30, 2016 ($ in millions) Commercial
Banking
 Branch  
Banking  
 Consumer
Lending
 Wealth 
and Asset 
Management 
 General
Corporate
and Other(e)
 Eliminations Total(e)
June 30, 2017 ($ in millions)  Commercial
Banking
   Branch  
Banking  
   Consumer
Lending
   

Wealth

and Asset
Management

 General
Corporate
and Other
 Eliminations Total 

Net interest income

 $911  859  122  87  (174    1,805   $415    437    59    37  (9    939 

Provision for loan and lease losses

 137  69  21  1  (18    210 

Provision for (benefit from) loan and lease losses

   22    39    7    (1 (15    52 

Net interest income after provision for loan and lease losses

 774  790  101  86  (156    1,595    393    398    52    38  6     887 

Noninterest income:

           

Service charges on deposits

   73    66    -    -   -     139 

Wealth and asset management revenue

   1    35    -    100   -  (33)(a)   103 

Corporate banking revenue

   100    1    -    -   -     101 

Card and processing revenue

   14    64    -    1   -     79 

Mortgage banking net revenue

   -    1    54    -   -     55 

Other noninterest income(b)

   40    22    6    -  17     85 

Securities gains, net -non-qualifying hedges on MSRs

   -    -    2    -   -     2 

Total noninterest income

  457(c)   401(b)  164  202  78   (67)(a)  1,235    228    189    62    101  17  (33 564 

Noninterest expense:

           

Salaries, wages and incentives

   60    104    40    37  156     397 

Employee benefits

   9    26    10    7  34     86 

Net occupancy expense

   7    43    3    2  15     70 

Technology and communications

   2    1    1    -  53     57 

Equipment expense

   4    13    -    -  12     29 

Card and processing expense

   1    33    -    -  (1    33 

Other noninterest expense

   247    196    55    67  (247 (33 285 

Total noninterest expense

 716  820  240  215  44  (67 1,968    330    416    109    113  22  (33 957 

Income before income taxes

 515  371  25  73  (122    862    291    171    5    26  1     494 

Applicable income tax expense

 77  131  9  25  (30    212    54    60    2    9  2     127 

Net income

 438  240  16  48  (92    650 

Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests

  -   -   -   -  (4    (4)

Net income attributable to Bancorp

 438  240  16  48  (88    654 

Dividends on preferred stock

  -   -   -   -  38     38 

Net income available to common shareholders

 $438  240  16  48  (126    616 

Net income (loss)

   237    111    3    17  (1    367 

Total goodwill

 $613  1,655   -  148   -     2,416   $613    1,655    -    155   -     2,423 

Total assets

 $60,042  54,220  22,598  8,399   (1,634)(d)     143,625   $          57,766    57,396    22,442    8,238  (4,775)(c)      141,067 
(a)

Revenue sharing agreements between wealth and asset management and branch banking are eliminated in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income.

(b)

Includes impairment charges of $3$2 for branches and land. For more information refer to Note 7 and Note 21.

(c)

Includes bank premises and equipment of $41 classified as held for sale. For more information refer to Note 7.

Fifth Third Bancorp and Subsidiaries

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)

The following tables present the results of operations and assets by business segment for the six months ended:

June 30, 2018 ($ in millions)

 

    Commercial

    Banking

  

Branch  

Banking  

  

Consumer

Lending

  

Wealth 

and Asset 

Management 

  

General  

Corporate  

and Other  

  

Eliminations

  

Total

 

Net interest income

 $846    965   118   88     (1)      2,016  

Provision for (benefit from) loan and lease losses

  (29)   90   20   5     (30)      56  

Net interest income after provision for loan and lease losses

  875    875   98   83     29       1,960  

Noninterest income:

       

Service charges on deposits

  139    134   -   1           275  

Wealth and asset management revenue

     74   -   214        (69)(a)   221  

Corporate banking revenue

  205(c)   2   -   1           208  

Card and processing revenue

  28    133   -   2           163  

Mortgage banking net revenue

     3   106   -           109  

Other noninterest income(b)

  73    7   7   9     612       708  

Securities losses, net

     -   -   -     (15)      (15) 

Securities losses, net -non-qualifying hedges on MSRs

     -   (17  -           (17) 

Total noninterest income

  447    353   96   227     598    (69)   1,652  

Noninterest expense:

       

Salaries, wages and incentives

  141    220   82   87     388       918  

Employee benefits

  27    53   20   17     71       188  

Net occupancy expense

  13    88   5   6     37       149  

Technology and communications

     3   2   -     126       135  

Equipment expense

  11    25   -   -     25       61  

Card and processing expense

     59   -   -     (1)      60  

Other noninterest expense

  545    423   102   144     (573)   (69)   572  

Total noninterest expense

  743    871   211   254     73    (69)   2,083  

Income (loss) before income taxes

  579    357   (17  56     554       1,529  

Applicable income tax expense (benefit)

  32    75   (3  12     123       239  

Net income (loss)

  547    282   (14  44     431       1,290  

Total goodwill

 $630    1,655   -   177           2,462  

Total assets

 $58,763    60,281   22,128   9,270     (9,747)(d)      140,695  
(a)

Revenue sharing agreements between wealth and asset management and branch banking are eliminated in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income.

(b)

Includes impairment charges of$41 for branches and land. For more information refer to Note 7 and Note 21.

(c)

Includes impairment charges of $5 $2for operating lease equipment. For more information refer to Note 8 and Note 21.

(d)

Includes bank premises and equipment of $52$37 classified as held for sale. For more information refer to Note 7.

Fifth Third Bancorp and Subsidiaries

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)

June 30, 2017 ($ in millions)

 

    Commercial

    Banking

  

  Branch  

  Banking  

  

Consumer

Lending

  

Wealth

and Asset

Management

  

General

Corporate

and Other

  

Eliminations

  

Total

 

Net interest income

 $839   867   120   75    (29     1,872  

Provision for (benefit from) loan and lease losses

  29   80   22      (8     126  

Net interest income after provision for loan and lease losses

  810   787   98   72    (21     1,746  

Total noninterest income

       

Service charges on deposits

  146   130   -      -      277  

Wealth and asset management revenue

  2   71   -   205    -   (67)(a)    211  

Corporate banking revenue

  173(c)   3   -      (1     175  

Card and processing revenue

  28   122   -      -      153  

Mortgage banking net revenue

  -   3   105      -      108  

Other noninterest income(b)

  80   45   9      26      160  

Securities gains, net

  -   -   -      1       

Securities gains, net -non-qualifying hedges on MSRs

  -   -   2      -       

Total noninterest income

  429   374   116   209    26   (67)   1,087  

Noninterest expense

       

Salaries, wages and incentives

  127   208   77   76    320      808  

Employee benefits

  27   53   20   16    80      196  

Net occupancy expense

  13   90   5      35      148  

Technology and communications

  5   2   1      108      116  

Equipment expense

  8   26   -      23      57  

Card and processing expense

  2   62   -      (1     63  

Other noninterest expense

  507   388   110   134    (517  (67)   555  

Total noninterest expense

  689   829   213   231    48   (67)   1,943  

Income (loss) before income taxes

  550   332   1   50    (43     890  

Applicable income tax expense (benefit)

  97   117   -   17    (13     218  

Net income (loss)

  453   215   1   33    (30     672  

Total goodwill

 $613   1,655   -   155    -      2,423  

Total assets

 $57,766   57,396   22,442   8,238    (4,775)(d)       141,067  
(e)(a)

Net tax deficienciesRevenue sharing agreements between wealth and asset management and branch banking are eliminated in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of $6 were reclassified from capital surplusIncome.

(b)

Includes impairment charges of $5 for branches and land. For more information refer to applicable income tax expenseNote 7 and Note 21.

(c)

Includes impairment charges of $31 for the six months ended June 30, 2016 relatedoperating lease equipment. For more information refer to the early adoptionNote 21.

(d)

Includes bank premises and equipment of ASU2016-09 during the fourth quarter of 2016, with an effective date of January 1, 2016.$41 classified as held for sale. For more information refer to Note 7.

23. Subsequent EventPending Acquisition

On August 7, 2017,May 21, 2018, Fifth Third Bancorp and MB Financial, Inc. jointly announced the signing of a definitive merger agreement under which, on the terms and conditions set forth therein, MB Financial, Inc. (“MB Financial”) will merge with a subsidiary of Fifth Third Bancorp in a transaction valued at approximately $4.7 billion based on the closing price of Fifth Third’s common shares on May 18, 2018. MB Financial is headquartered in Chicago, Illinois with reported assets of approximately $20 billion as of March 31, 2018 and is the holding company of MB Financial Bank, N.A. In conjunction with the closing of the transaction, two members of MB Financial’s Board of Directors are expected to join the Fifth Third Bancorp Board.

Under the terms of the agreement, common shareholders of MB Financial will receive 1.45 shares of Fifth Third common stock and $5.54 in cash for each share of MB Financial common stock, which had an implied value of $54.20 per share of MB Financial common stock, based on the closing price of Fifth Third’s common shares on May 18, 2018. The exchange ratio of Fifth Third common shares for MB Financial common shares is fixed and will not adjust based on changes in Fifth Third’s share trading price.

The transaction is subject to the satisfaction of all customary closing conditions, including regulatory approval as well as the approval of MB Financial shareholders. The transaction is expected to close in the first quarter of 2019.

24. Subsequent Events

On July 26, 2018 the Bank issued and sold $1.55 billion in aggregate principal amount of unsecured senior bank notes. The bank notes consisted of $500 million of 3.35% senior fixed-rate notes, with a maturity of three years, due on July 26, 2021; $300 million of senior floating-rate notes at three-month LIBOR plus 44 bps, with a maturity of three years, due on July 26, 2021; and $750 million of 3.95% senior fixed-rate notes, with a maturity of seven years, due July 28, 2025. The Bank entered into interest rate swaps to convert the fixed-rate notes due in 2021 and 2025 to a transaction agreement with Vantiv, Inc.floating-rate, which resulted in an effective interest rate of one-month LIBOR plus 53 bps and Vantiv Holding, LLC under which Fifth Third104 bps, respectively. These bank notes will be redeemable by the Bank, has agreedin whole or in part, on or after the date that is 30 days prior to exercise its rightthe maturity date at a redemption price equal to exchange 19,790,000100% of the principal amount plus accrued and unpaid interest up to, but excluding, the redemption date.

Between July 20, 2018 and August 2, 2018, the Bancorp entered into repurchase transactions of 16,945,020 shares, or approximately $500 million, of its Class B Units in Vantiv Holding, LLC for 19,790,000 shares of Vantiv, Inc.’s Class A Common Stockoutstanding common stock through the open market, which settled between July 24, 2018 and Vantiv, Inc. has agreed to repurchase the newly issued shares of Class A Common Stock upon issue directly from Fifth Third Bank at a price of $64.04 per share, the closing share price of the Class A Common Stock on the New York Stock Exchange on August 4, 2017. The share repurchase is conditioned on Vantiv, Inc. publishing a firm offer to acquire Worldpay Group plc. and is subject to termination, if among other things, the firm offer is not made by August 31, 2017.6, 2018.

During the third quarter of 2017, the Bancorp expects to recognize a pre-tax gain of approximately $1.0 billion related to these transactions. Following the share repurchase, the Bancorp is expected to beneficially own approximately 8.6% of Vantiv Holding, LLC’s equity through its ownership of approximately 15.3 million Class B Units of Vantiv Holding, LLC.

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

Legal Proceedings (Item 1)

Refer to Note 1716 of the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements in Part I, Item 1 for information regarding legal proceedings.

Risk Factors (Item 1A)

There have been no material changes made during the second quarter of 2017The following is a change to any of the risk factors as previously disclosed in the Bancorp’s most recent annual report as filedRegistrant’s Annual Report on Form10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017.

The acquisition of MB Financial may dilute current shareholders’ ownership of Fifth Third and may cause Fifth Third to become more susceptible to adverse economic events.

Fifth Third will issue a substantial number of additional shares of stock in its merger with MB Financial, which will dilute current shareholders’ ownership interests. Fifth Third will also use substantial cash or other liquid assets or incur debt to fund the merger. In those events, Fifth Third could become more susceptible to economic downturns, market conditions and competitive pressures.

Fifth Third and MB Financial will incur transaction and integration costs in connection with the SEC.merger.

Each of Fifth Third and MB Financial has incurred and expects that it will incur significant,non-recurring costs in connection with consummating the merger. In addition, Fifth Third will incur integration costs following the completion of the merger as Fifth Third integrates the businesses of the two companies, including facilities and systems consolidation costs and employment-related costs. There can be no assurances that the expected benefits and efficiencies related to the integration of the businesses will be realized to offset these transaction and integration costs over time. See the risk factor entitled “—Fifth Third May Fail to Realize the Anticipated Benefits of the Merger” below. Fifth Third and MB Financial may also incur additional costs to maintain employee morale and to retain key employees. Fifth Third and MB Financial will also incur significant legal, financial advisor, accounting, banking and consulting fees, fees relating to regulatory filings and notices, SEC filing fees, printing and mailing fees and other costs associated with the merger. Some of these costs are payable regardless of whether the merger is completed.

Fifth Third may fail to realize the anticipated benefits of the merger.

Inherent uncertainties exist when assessing or integrating the operations of an acquired business or investment or relationship opportunity. Fifth Third may not be able to fully achieve its strategic objectives and planned operating efficiencies in its acquisition of MB Financial, Inc. Additionally, integration of MB Financial may require Fifth Third to devote substantial time and resources and may cause this acquisition to be unprofitable or cause Fifth Third to be unable to pursue other business opportunities.

Fifth Third and MB Financial have operated and, until the completion of the merger, will continue to operate, independently. The success of the merger, including anticipated benefits and cost savings, will depend on, among other things, Fifth Third’s ability to combine the businesses of Fifth Third and MB Financial in a manner that permits growth opportunities, including, among other things, enhanced revenues and revenue synergies, an expanded market reach and operating efficiencies, and does not materially disrupt the existing customer relationships of Fifth Third or MB Financial or result in decreased revenues due to any loss of customers. If Fifth Third is not able to successfully achieve these objectives, the anticipated benefits of the merger may not be realized fully or at all or may take longer to realize than expected. Failure to achieve these anticipated benefits could result in increased costs, decreases in the amount of expected revenues and diversion of management’s time and energy and could have an adverse effect on the combined company’s business, financial condition, operating results and prospects.

Certain employees may not be employed by Fifth Third after the merger. In addition, employees that Fifth Third wishes to retain may elect to terminate their employment as a result of the merger, which could delay or disrupt the integration process. It is possible that the integration process could result in the disruption of Fifth Third’s or MB Financial’s ongoing businesses or cause inconsistencies in standards, controls, procedures and policies that adversely affect the ability of Fifth Third or MB Financial to maintain relationships with customers and employees or to achieve the anticipated benefits of the merger.

After completing the acquisition, Fifth Third may find certain items were not accounted for properly in accordance with financial accounting and reporting standards. Fifth Third may also not realize the expected benefits of the acquisition due to lower financial results pertaining to the acquired entity or assets. For example, Fifth Third could experience higher charge-offs than originally anticipated related to the acquired loan portfolio. Additionally, acquired companies or businesses may increase Fifth Third’s risk of regulatory action or restrictions related to the operations of the acquired business.

Regulatory approvals may not be received, may take longer than expected or may impose conditions that are not presently anticipated or cannot be met.

Before the transactions contemplated in the merger agreement can be completed, various approvals must be obtained from the bank regulatory and other governmental authorities. In deciding whether to grant these approvals, the relevant governmental entities will consider a variety of factors, including the regulatory standing of each of the parties and the effect of the merger on competition. An adverse development in either party’s regulatory standing or other factors could result in an inability to obtain one or more of the required regulatory approvals or delay receipt of required approvals.

The Federal Reserve Board has stated that if supervisory issues arise during processing of an application for approval of a merger transaction, a banking organization will be expected to withdraw its application pending resolution of such supervisory concerns. Accordingly, if there is an adverse development in either party’s regulatory standing, Fifth Third may be required to withdraw its application for approval of the proposed merger and, if possible, resubmit it after the applicable supervisory concerns have been resolved.

The terms of the approvals that are granted may impose conditions, limitations, obligations or costs, or place restrictions on the conduct of the combined company’s business or require changes to the terms of the transactions contemplated by the merger agreement. There can be no assurance that regulators will not impose any such conditions, limitations, obligations or restrictions and that such conditions, limitations, obligations or restrictions will not have the effect of delaying the completion of any of the transactions contemplated by the merger agreement, imposing additional material costs on or materially limiting the revenues of the combined company following the merger or otherwise reduce the anticipated benefits of the merger if the merger were consummated successfully within the expected timeframe. Nor can there be any assurance that any such conditions, terms, obligations or restrictions will not result in the delay or abandonment of the merger. Additionally, the completion of the merger is conditioned on the absence of certain orders, injunctions or decrees by any court or regulatory agency of competent jurisdiction that would prohibit or make illegal the completion of any of the transactions contemplated by the merger agreement.

Fifth Third and MB Financial believe that the proposed transactions should not raise significant regulatory concerns and that Fifth Third will be able to obtain all requisite regulatory approvals in a timely manner. However, the processing time for obtaining regulatory approvals for mergers of banking institutions, particularly for larger institutions, has increased since the financial crisis. In addition, despite the parties’ commitments to use their reasonable best efforts to comply with conditions imposed by regulatory entities, under the terms of the merger agreement, Fifth Third and MB Financial will not be required to take actions that would reasonably be expected to have a material adverse effect on Fifth Third and its subsidiaries, taken as a whole, after giving effect to the merger (measured on a scale relative to MB Financial and its subsidiaries, taken as a whole).

The merger agreement may be terminated in accordance with its terms and the merger may not be completed.

The merger agreement is subject to a number of conditions which must be fulfilled in order to complete the merger. Those conditions include: approval of the merger and charter amendment by the MB Financial common stockholders, receipt of requisite regulatory approvals, absence of orders prohibiting completion of any of the proposed transactions, effectiveness of the registration statement of which this proxy statement/prospectus is a part, approval of the Fifth Third common shares to be issued in connection with the merger for listing on the NASDAQ, the accuracy of the representations and warranties by both parties (subject to the materiality standards set forth in the merger agreement) and the performance by both parties of their covenants and agreements, and the receipt by both parties of legal opinions from their respective tax counsels. These conditions to the closing of the merger may not be fulfilled in a timely manner or at all, and, accordingly, the merger may not be completed. In addition, the parties can mutually decide to terminate the merger agreement at any time, before or after stockholder approval, or Fifth Third or MB Financial may elect to terminate the merger agreement in certain other circumstances.

Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds (Item 2)

Refer to the “Capital Management” section within Management’s Discussion and Analysis in Part I, Item 2 for information regarding purchases and sales of equity securities by the Bancorp during the second quarter of 2017.2018.

Defaults Upon Senior Securities (Item 3)

None.

Mine Safety Disclosures (Item 4)

Not applicable.

Other Information (Item 5)

None.

Exhibits (Item 6)

 

2.1

Agreement and Plan of Merger by and among Fifth Third Bancorp, Fifth Third Financial Corporation and MB Financial, Inc., dated as of May 20, 2018. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form8-K filed with the SEC on May 22, 2018.

3.1

 

Amended Articles of Incorporation of Fifth Third Bancorp, as amended. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2014.

3.2

 

Code of Regulations of Fifth Third Bancorp as Amended as of September 15, 2014. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form10-K filed with the SEC on February 25, 2016.

4.1

 

FifthSeventh Supplemental Indenture dated as of June 15, 20175, 2018 between Fifth Third Bancorp and Wilmington Trust Company, as Trustee, to the Indenture for Senior Debt Securities dated as of April 30, 2008 between Fifth Third Bancorp and the Trustee. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form8-K filed with the SEC on June 15, 2017.5, 2018.

4.2

 

Form of 2.600%Floating Rate Senior Notes due 2022.2021. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form8-K filed with the SEC on June 15, 2017.5, 2018.

10.1

 

Fifth Third Bancorp 2017 Incentive Compensation Plan. Incorporated by reference to Annex A to the Registrant’s Proxy Statement dated March 9, 2017.*

10.2

Supplemental Confirmation dated April 26, 2017,May 23, 2018, to Master Confirmation, dated May 21, 2013,July  29, 2015, for accelerated share repurchase transaction between Fifth Third Bancorp and Deutsche Bank AG, London Branch, with Deutsche Bank Securities Inc. acting as agent.Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC.**

10.3

Restricted Stock Unit Agreement (for Directors) for Fifth Third Bancorp 2017 Incentive Compensation Plan.*

10.4

Second Amendment to Fifth Third Bancorp 401(k) Savings Plan, as Amended and Restated effective January 1, 2015.*

10.5

First Amendment to Fifth Third Bancorp Unfunded Deferred Compensation Plan forNon-Employee Directors, as Amended and Restated effective June 1, 2013.*

10.6

Second Amendment to the Fifth Third BancorpNon-qualified Deferred Compensation Plan, as Amended and Restated effective January 1, 2013.*

12.1

 

Computations of Consolidated Ratios of Earnings to Fixed Charges.

12.2

 

Computations of Consolidated Ratios of Earnings to Combined Fixed Charges and Preferred Stock Dividend Requirements.

31(i)

 

Certification Pursuant to Section  302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 by Chief Executive Officer.

31(ii)

 

Certification Pursuant to Section  302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 by Chief Financial Officer.

32(i)

 

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section  906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 by Chief Executive Officer.

32(ii)

 

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section  906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 by Chief Financial Officer.

101

 

Interactive data files pursuant to Rule 405 of RegulationS-T: (i) the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets, (ii) the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income, (iii) the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income, (iv) the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Changes in Equity, (v) the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, and (vi) the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements tagged as blocks of text and in detail.

* Denotes management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.

**An application for confidential treatment for selected portions of this exhibit has been filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Signatures

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

 

   

Fifth Third Bancorp

 
   

Registrant

 

Date: August 8, 20172018

    
   

/s/ Tayfun Tuzun

 
   

Tayfun Tuzun

 
   

Executive Vice President and

 
   

Chief Financial Officer

 

(Duly Authorized Officer & Principal Financial Officer)

 

112120