UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

Form10-Q

For the quarterly period endedSeptember 30, 20172019

OR

Commission File Number:1-10476

Hugoton Royalty Trust

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

c/o The Corporate Trustee:

Simmons Bank

2911 Turtle Creek Blvd, Suite 850

Dallas, Texas 75219

(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)

(855)588-7839

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

NONE

(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if change since last report)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  ☑    No  ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of RegulationS-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).    Yes  ☐    No  ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, anon-accelerated filer, smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule12b-2 of the Exchange Act (check one):Act:

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act.  ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act Rule12b-2)Act).    Yes  ☐    No  ☑

Indicate the number of units of beneficial interest outstanding, as of the latest practicable date:

Outstanding as of November 1, 20172019

40,000,000

HUGOTON ROYALTY TRUST

FORM10-Q FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 20172019

TABLE OF CONTENTS

HUGOTON ROYALTY TRUST

GLOSSARY OF TERMS

The following are definitions of significant terms used in this Form10-Q:

HUGOTON ROYALTY TRUST

PART I- FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements.

The condensed financial statements included herein are presented, without audit, pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in annual financial statements have been condensed or omitted pursuant to such rules and regulations, although the Trustee believes that the disclosures are adequate to make the information presented not misleading. These condensed financial statements should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and the notes thereto included in the Trust’s latest Annual Report on Form10-K. In the opinion of the Trustee, all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments, necessary for a fair statement of the assets, liabilities and trust corpus of the Hugoton Royalty Trust at September 30, 20172019 and the distributable income and changes in trust corpus for the three-three-month and nine-month periods ended September 30, 20172019 and 20162018 have been included. Distributable income for such interim periods is not necessarily indicative of the distributable income for the full year. The condensed financial statements as of September 30, 2017,2019, and for the three-month and nine-month periods ended September 30, 20172019 and 20162018 have been subjected to a review by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, the Trust’s independent registered public accounting firm, whose report is included herein.

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Unitholders of Hugoton Royalty Trust and

SouthwestSimmons Bank, TrusteeTrustee:

Results of Review of Interim Financial Statements

We have reviewed the accompanying condensed statement of assets, liabilities and trust corpus of Hugoton Royalty Trust (the “Trust”) as of September 30, 2017,2019, and the related condensed statements of distributable income and of changes in trust corpus for the three-month and nine-month periods ended September 30, 20172019 and 2016. These2018, including the related notes (collectively referred to as the “interim financial statements”). Based on our reviews, we are not aware of any material modifications that should be made to the accompanying interim financial statements arefor them to be in conformity with the responsibilitymodified cash basis of the Trustee.accounting described in Note 1.

We conducted our reviewhave previously audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States)., the statements of assets, liabilities and trust corpus as of December 31, 2018, and the related statements of distributable income and of changes in trust corpus for the year then ended (not presented herein), and in our report dated March 29, 2019, which included a paragraph describing the modified cash basis of accounting and a paragraph regarding substantial doubt about the Trust’s ability to continue as a going concern, we expressed an unqualified opinion on those financial statements. In our opinion, the information set forth in the accompanying condensed statement of assets, liabilities and trust corpus as of December 31, 2018, is fairly stated, in all material respects, in relation to the statements of assets, liabilities and trust corpus from which it has been derived.

Basis for Review Results

These interim financial statements are the responsibility of the Trust’s management. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to the Trust in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB. We conducted our review in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. A review of interim financial information consists principally of applying analytical procedures and making inquiries of persons responsible for financial and accounting matters. It is substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States),PCAOB, the objective of which is the expression of an opinion regarding the financial statements taken as a whole. Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion.

Substantial Doubt about the Company’s Ability to Continue as a Going Concern

The accompanying interim financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Trust will continue as a going concern. Note 2 of the Trust’s audited financial statements as of December 31, 2018 and 2017, and for the years then ended, includes a statement that substantial doubt exists about the Trust’s ability to continue as a going concern. Note 2 of the Trust’s audited financial statements also discloses the events and conditions, management’s evaluation of the events and conditions, and management’s plans regarding these matters, including the fact that a reduction in net profits income as a result of excess costs have led to a decline to the expense reserve available to the Trust for the payment of its obligations. Our report on those financial statements includes a paragraph referring to the matters in Note 2 of those financial statements. As indicated in Note 1 of the accompanying interim financial statements, as of September 30, 2019, and for the three-months and nine-months then ended, the events and conditions impacting the Trust have not changed, and as a result, the Trust has stated that substantial doubt exists about the Trust’s ability to continue as a going concern. The accompanying interim financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

Basis of Accounting

As described in Note 1, these interim financial statements were prepared on the modified cash basis of accounting, which is a comprehensive basis of accounting other than accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

Based on our review, we are not aware of any material modifications that should be made to the accompanying condensed interim financial statements for them to be in conformity with the basis of accounting described in Note 1.

We previously audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the statement of assets, liabilities and trust corpus as of December 31, 2016, and the related statements of distributable income and changes in trust corpus for the year then ended (not presented herein), and in our report dated March 10, 2017, we expressed an unqualified opinion on those financial statements. In our opinion, the information set forth in the accompanying condensed statement of assets, liabilities and trust corpus as of December 31, 2016 is fairly stated, in all material respects, in relation to the statement of assets, liabilities and trust corpus from which it has been derived.

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Dallas, TXTexas

November 6, 201714, 2019

HUGOTON ROYALTY TRUST

Condensed Statements of Assets, Liabilities and Trust Corpus(Unaudited)

The accompanying notes to condensed financial statements are an integral part of these statements.

HUGOTON ROYALTY TRUST

Condensed Statements of Distributable Income (Unaudited)

The accompanying notes to condensed financial statements are an integral part of these statements.

HUGOTON ROYALTY TRUST

Condensed Statements of Changes in Trust Corpus(Unaudited)

The accompanying notes to condensed financial statements are an integral part of these statements.

HUGOTON ROYALTY TRUST

Notes to Condensed Financial Statements(Unaudited)

The financial statements of Hugoton Royalty Trust (the “Trust”) are prepared on the following basis and are not intended to present financial position and results of operations in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”):

Costs deducted in the calculation of net proceeds for the 80% net profits interests generally include applicable taxes, transportation, marketing and legal costs, production expense, development costs, operating charges and other costs.

The Trust’s financial statements differ from those prepared in conformity with U.S. GAAP because revenues are recognized when received rather than accrued in the month of production, expenses are recognized when paid rather than when incurred and certain cash reserves may be established by the Trustee for contingencies which would not be recorded under U.S. GAAP. This comprehensive basis of accounting other than U.S. GAAP corresponds to the accounting permitted for royalty trusts by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, as specified by Staff Accounting Bulletin Topic 12:E, Financial Statements of Royalty Trusts.

Most accounting pronouncements apply to entities whose financial statements are prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP, directing such entities to accrue or defer revenues and expenses in a period other than when such revenues were received or expenses were paid. Because the Trust’s financial statements are prepared on the modified cash basis, as described above, most accounting pronouncements are not applicable to the Trust’s financial statements.

Impairment of Net Profits Interest

The Trustee reviews the Trust’s net profits interests (“NPI”) in oil and gas properties for impairment whenever events or circumstances indicate that the carrying value of the NPI may not be recoverable. In general, the Trustee does not view temporarily low prices as an indication of impairment. The markets for crude oil and natural gas have a history of significant price volatility and though prices will occasionally drop significantly, industry prices over the long term will continue to be driven by market supply and demand. If events and circumstances indicatedindicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable, the Trustee would use the estimated undiscounted future net cash flows from the NPI to evaluate the recoverability of the Trust assets. If the undiscounted future net cash flows from the NPI are less than the NPI carrying value, the Trust would recognize an impairment loss for the difference between the NPI carrying value and the estimated fair value of the NPI. The determination as to whether the NPI is impaired requires a significant amount of judgment by the Trustee and is based on the best information available to the Trustee at the time of the evaluation.evaluation, including information provided by XTO Energy such as estimates of future production and development and operating expenses.

In lightSignificantly, during the third quarter of lower2019, long term gas prices used to develop projections of future cash flows continueddeclined further and excess costs on twoall three conveyances increased substantially. In light of these facts and zero distributions to unitholders for the quarter ended June 30, 2016, the Trustee concludedcircumstances, an impairment trigger event occurred in the secondthird quarter of 2016 that the events or circumstances indicated the carrying value may not be recoverable and an2019. An assessment of the forecasted net cash flows was performed for the NPI indicated that the estimated undiscounted future net cash flows from the NPI were below the carrying value of the NPI. During the third quarter of 2019, the NPI was written down to its fair value of zero, resulting in a $15.7 million impairment charged directly to Trust corpus, which does not affect distributable income. The fair value of the NPI was developed using estimates for future oil and gas production attributable to the Trust, future crude oil and natural gas commodity prices published by third-party industry experts (adjusted for basis differentials), estimated taxes, development and operating expenses, and a risk-adjusted discount rate. TheImpairments recorded for book purposes will not result of the assessment indicated that the estimated undiscounted future net cash flows from the NPI were below the carrying value of the NPI. The NPI was written down to its fair value of $28.8 million, resulting in a $57.3 million impairment charged directly to trust corpus, which did not affect distributable income.

There was no impairment ofloss for tax purposes for the NPI duringunitholders until the quarter ended September 30, 2017.loss is recognized.

Net profits interests in oil and gas properties

The initial carrying value of the net profits interests of $247,066,951 represents XTO Energy’s historical net book value for the interests on December 1, 1998, the date of the transfer to the Trust. During the second quarter 2016, the carrying value of the NPI was written down to its fair value of $28,801,000, resulting in an impairment of $57,306,527 charged directly to Trusttrust corpus. During the third quarter 2019, the carrying value of the NPI was written down to its fair value of zero, resulting in an impairment of $15,681,533 charged directly to trust corpus. Amortization of the net profits interests is calculated on aunit-of-production basis and charged directly to Trusttrust corpus. Accumulated amortization was $171,177,542$174,078,891 as of September 30, 20172019 and $162,874,921$173,943,434 as of December 31, 2016.2018.

Liquidity and Going Concern

The accompanying condensed financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Trust will continue as a going concern. Financial statements prepared on a going concern basis assume the realization of assets and the settlement of liabilities in the normal course of business. Increases in excess costs for the Kansas, Oklahoma and Wyoming conveyances have resulted in no net proceeds to the Trust for the last nine months of 2018 and a reduction in the Trust’s expense reserve. In March through May of 2019, the Trust received net profits income from the Wyoming conveyance in an amount that covered all of the Trust’s administrative expenses and allowed for a partial replenishment of the expense reserve, but there were no funds to distribute to unitholders. The net profits income in these months are not necessarily indicative of future cash inflows for the next 12 months. These conditions raise substantial doubt about the Trust’s ability to continue as a going concern as the Trust may not have, based on the current estimated administrative expenses, sufficient cash to meet its obligations during the one year period after the date

the condensed financial statements are issued. Factors attributable to the potential cash shortage are primarily the previously disclosed increase in development costs to drill four horizontal wells in Major County, Oklahoma (actual cost incurred through third quarter 2019 are $27 million net to the Trust) which have created an excess cost position on the Oklahoma conveyance. Additionally, excess cost positions on the Kansas and Wyoming conveyances have resulted in no net proceeds to the Trust from the Kansas conveyance for all of 2018 and 2019 and no net proceeds to the Trust from the Wyoming conveyance for all of 2018 and 2019, with the exception of the March through May distributions. The Trustee has prepared a preliminary budget estimating the administrative expenses for the next 12 months which assumes no cash inflow from either net profits income or from other sources. This budget estimates that the expense reserve will be depleted by approximately April 2020. If either income or expenses differ from the assumptions in the Trustee’s preliminary budget, this date may be sooner or later than the estimate. Both the Trustee and XTO Energy believe the Trust could obtain additional financing, including by borrowing under one or more debt instruments, in an amount sufficient to pay its obligations for the next year. This outcome would ensure that the Trust could continue as a going concern; however, there is no assurance that such additional financing could be obtained. If the Trust obtains debt financing, any funds borrowed must be repaid in full, including accrued interest, before distributions to unitholders could be made. The Trust’s condensed financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

The following summarizes actual development costs, budgeted development costs deducted in the calculation of net profits income, and the cumulative actual costs compared to the amount deducted for the underlying properties:

		Three Months Ended September 30								Nine Months Ended September 30
		2017				2016				2017				2016
Cumulative actual costs under (over) the amount deducted—beginning of period		$	(83,055	)		$	438,751			$	56,243			$	239,528
Actual costs			(434,911	)			(502,300	)			(1,774,209	)			(1,228,077	)
Budgeted costs deducted			760,000				150,000				1,960,000				1,075,000
Cumulative actual costs under (over) the amount deducted—end of period		$	242,034			$	86,451			$	242,034			$	86,451

		Three Months Ended September 30								Nine Months Ended September 30
		2019				2018				2019				2018
Cumulative actual costs under (over) the amount deducted - beginning of period		$	2,137,110			$	5,641,612			$	13,913,191			$	537,144
Actual costs			(10,414,724	)			(975,300	)			(30,645,355	)			(3,273,332	)
Budgeted / actual costs deducted			8,277,614				6,562,500				16,732,164				13,965,000
Cumulative actual costs under (over) the amount deducted - end of period		$	—			$	11,228,812			$	—			$	11,228,812

The monthly deduction is based on the current level of development expenditures, budgeted future development costs and the cumulative actual costs under (over) previous deductions. XTO Energy has advised the Trustee that 2017actual development costs for properties underlying the Kansas and Wyoming net profits interests were charged to the Trust as incurred. XTO has advised the Trustee that actual development costs for the properties underlying the Oklahoma net profits interests were charged to the Trust as incurred once the accrual was fully depleted as of the July 2019 distribution. XTO Energy has advised the Trustee that drilling in Major County, Oklahoma is complete and resulted in cost overruns due to unforeseen expenditures that were charged to the Trust in the third quarter of 2019. XTO Energy has advised the Trustee that 2019 budgeted development costs for the underlying properties are between $2 million and $4 million. The 20172019 budget year generally coincides with the Trust distribution months from April 20172019 through March 2018. XTO Energy has advised the Trustee that due to increasednon-operated development activity on properties underlying the Oklahoma net profits interests, it increased the monthly development cost deduction from $200,000 to $280,000 beginning with the August 2017 distribution.2020. Changes in oil or natural gas prices could impact future development plans on the underlying properties. XTO Energy has advised the Trustee that this monthly deduction will continue to be evaluated and revised as necessary.

For federal income tax purposes, the Trust constitutes a fixed investment trust that is taxed as a grantor trust. A grantor trust is not subject to tax at the trust level. Accordingly, no provision for income taxes has been made in the financial statements. The unitholders are considered to own the Trust’s income and principal as though no trust were in existence. The income of the Trust is deemed to have been received or accrued by each unitholder at the time such income is received or accrued by the Trust and not when distributed by the Trust. Impairments recorded for book purposes will not result in a loss for tax purposes for the unitholders until the loss is recognized.

All revenues from the Trust are from sources within Kansas, Oklahoma or Wyoming. Because it distributes all of its net income to unitholders, the Trust has not been taxed at the trust level in Kansas or Oklahoma. While the Trust has not owed tax, the Trustee is generally required to file anKansas and Oklahoma income tax returnreturns reflecting the income and deductions of the Trust attributable to properties located in theeach state, along with a schedule that includes information regarding distributions to unitholders. TheHowever, the Trust does not expect to file a Kansas income tax return for the 20172019 tax year because it expects to have no revenues, income or deductions in 20172019 attributable to properties located in Kansas. The Trust did not file a Kansas income tax return with Kansas for the 20162018 and 20152017 tax years for the same reason.

Wyoming does not impose a state income tax.

The Trust could potentially be required to bear a portion of the legal settlement costs arising from theChieftain settlement. For information on contingencies, including theChieftainclass action, see Note 4 to Condensed Financial Statements. In the event that the Trust is determined to be responsible for such costs, XTO will deduct the costs in its calculation of the net profits income payable to the Trust from the applicable net profits interests. Thus, for unitholders, the legal settlement costs will be reflected through a reduction in net profits income received from the Trust and thus in a reduction in the gross royalty income reported by and taxable to the unitholders. In the event that the Trustee objects to such claimed reductions, the Trustee may also incur legal fees in representing the Trust’s interests. For unitholders, such costs would be reflected through an increase in the Trust’s administrative expenses, which would be deductible by unitholders in determining the net royalty income from the Trust.

Each unitholder should consult his or her own tax advisor regarding income tax requirements, if any, applicable to such person’s ownership of Trust units.

Unitholders should consult the Trust’s latest annual report on Form10-K for a more detailed discussion of federal and state tax matters.

4.	Contingencies

In December 2010, a royalty class action lawsuit was filed againstLitigation

Royalty Class Action and Arbitration

As previously disclosed, XTO Energy styledChieftain Royalty Company v. XTO Energy Inc. in Coal County District Court, Oklahoma. XTO Energy removed the case to federal court in the Eastern District of Oklahoma. The plaintiffs allege that XTO Energy wrongfully deducted fees from royalty payments on Oklahoma wells, failed to make diligent efforts to secure the best terms available for the sale of gas and its constituents, and demand an accounting to determine whether they have been fully and fairly paid gas royalty interests. The case was certified as a class action in April 2012; however, on appeal in June 2012, the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals reversed the certification of the class and remanded the case back to the trial court for further proceedings. XTO Energy has informedadvised the Trustee that it has reached a tentative settlement forwith the matter and continues to negotiateplaintiffs in theChieftain class action royalty case. On July 27, 2018 the final settlement agreement. The Trustee has requestedplan of allocation was approved by the settlement amount from XTO Energy and has been informed that at this time,court. Based on the amount that XTO Energy believes should be charged to the Trust has not been determined.final plan of allocation XTO Energy has advised the Trustee that the settlement willit believes approximately $24.3 million in additional production costs should be allocated to all of XTO Energy’s Oklahoma wells, the majority of which areTrust. On May 2, 2018, the Trustee

submitted a demand for arbitration seeking a declaratory judgment that theChieftain settlement is not properties in which the Trust owns an underlying net profits interest.

The Trustee has informeda production cost and that XTO Energy that it intends to review any claimed reductionsis prohibited from charging the settlement as a production cost under the conveyance or otherwise reducing the Trust’s payments now or in payment to the Trust basedfuture as a result of theChieftain litigation. The hearing on the facts and circumstances of such settlement. In light of a 2014 arbitration decision in which a three panel tribunal decided that the settlement inFankhouser v. XTO Energy, Inc., including a new royalty calculation for future royalty payments, could not be chargedclaims related to the Trust, to the extent that the claims inChieftain are similarsettlement has been rescheduled for January 20, 2020. Other Trustee claims related to those indisputed amounts on the computation of the Trust’s net proceeds for 2014 through 2016 were bifurcated from the issues regarding XTO’s right to charge theFankhouserChieftain the Trustee would likely object to such claimed reductions. Should there besettlement as a disagreement as to whether the Trust should bear its share of a settlement or judgment, the matterproduction cost and will be resolved by binding arbitration through the American Arbitration Association under the terms of the Indenture creating the Trust. XTO Energy has informed the Trustee that, although the amount of any reduction in net proceedsheard at a later date, which is not presently determinable, in its management’s opinion, the amount is not currently expectedstill to be materialdetermined.

If the approximately $24.3 million allocated portion of theChieftainsettlement results in an adjustment to the Trust’s financial position or liquidity thoughshare of net proceeds, it could be material to the Trust’s annual distributable income. Additionally, XTO Energy has advised the Trustee that any reductions would result in additional excess costs exceeding revenues onunder the properties underlyingOklahoma conveyance that would likely result in no distributions under the net profits interests of the case, as applicable,Oklahoma conveyance for several monthly distributions,years, or more depending on the sizeresults of operations of the settlement, if any,underlying properties, while these additional excess costs are recovered.

Other Lawsuits and the net proceeds being paid at that time, which would result in the net profits interest being limited until such time that the revenues exceed the costs for those net profit interests.Governmental Proceedings

Certain of the underlying properties are involved in various other lawsuits and governmental proceedings arising in the ordinary course of business. XTO Energy has advised the Trustee that, based on the information available at this stage of the various proceedings, it does not believe that the ultimate resolution of these claims will have a material effect on the financial position or liquidity of the Trust, but may have an effect on annual distributable income.

Other

Several states have enacted legislation requiring state income tax withholding from payments made to nonresident recipients of oil and gas proceeds. After consultation with its tax counsel, the Trustee believes that it is not required to withhold on payments made to the unitholders. However, regulations are subject to change by the various states, which could change this conclusion. Should amounts be withheld on payments made to the Trust or the unitholders, distributions to the unitholders would be reduced by the required amount, subject to the filing of a claim for refund by the Trust or unitholders for such amount.

If monthly costs exceed revenues for any of the three conveyances (one for each of the states of Kansas, Oklahoma and Wyoming),conveyance, such excess costs must be recovered, with accrued interest, from future net proceeds of that conveyance and cannot reduce net proceeds from other conveyances.

The following summarizes excess costs activity, cumulative excess costs balance and accrued interest to be recovered by conveyance:

Improved gas pricesFor the quarter ended September 30, 2019, lower revenues in relation to costs resulted in the partial recovery ofnet excess costs on properties underlying the Kansas, Oklahoma and Wyoming net profits interests for the quarter ended September 30, 2017.interests.

Underlying cumulative excess costs for the Kansas, Oklahoma and Wyoming conveyances remaining as of September  30, 20172019 totaled $1.1$31.7 million, including accrued interest of $0.2$0.7 million.

XTO Energy advised the Trustee that the August 2016 distribution included aone-time reimbursement to the Trust of approximately $450,000 related to operated overhead corrections for the period of January 2014 through May 2016. This reimbursement affected the net profits income under the Oklahoma conveyance.

XTO Energy advised the Trustee that the May 2016 distribution included aone-time reimbursement to the Trust of approximately $788,000 related to operated overhead corrections for the period of January 2014 through February 2016. The reimbursement affected the net profits income under the Kansas, OklahomaItem 2. Trustee’s Discussion and Wyoming conveyances by approximately $186,000, $320,000 and $282,000 respectively.Analysis.

7.	Taxes, Transportation and Other Deductions

XTO Energy advised the Trustee that net profits income for August 2016 included a deduction of approximately $500,000 in additional gathering fees for the period of December 2015 through May 2016 related to a renegotiated gas purchase contract that included production from properties underlying the Oklahoma conveyance. The current contract term is December 1, 2015 until November 30, 2017.

Effective October 19, 2017, Simmons First National Corporation (“SFNC”) completed its acquisition of First Texas BHC, Inc., the parent company of Southwest Bank, the Trustee of the Trust. SFNC is the parent of Simmons Bank. SFNC has announced that it intends to operate Southwest Bank as a separate bank subsidiary for an interim period, after which it intends to merge it into Simmons Bank. The Trustee does not anticipate any material impact to the Trust as a result of the acquisition.

The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the Trustee’s discussion and analysis contained in the Trust’s 20162018 Annual Report on Form10-K, as well as the condensed financial statements and notes thereto included in this Quarterly Report on Form10-Q. The Trust’s Annual Report on Form10-K, quarterly reports on Form10-Q, current reports on Form8-K and all amendments to those reports are available on the Trust’s web site atwww.hgt-hugoton.com.

Distributable Income

Quarter

For the quarter ended September 30, 2017,2019, net profits income was $688,252,$0, as compared to $1,253,498$0 for third quarter 2016. This 45% decrease2018. No change in net profits income is primarily the result of increased development costs ($1.4 million), lower gas production ($1.2 million), lower gas and oil prices ($1.0 million), increased production expense ($0.7 million) and increased overhead ($0.2 million), partially offset by net excess costs activity ($0.62.5 million), increasedand higher oil production expense ($0.6 million), higher overhead ($0.5 million) and increased development costs ($0.5 million), partially offset by higher gas and oil prices ($2.1 million) and decreased taxes, transportation and other costs ($0.22.0 million). See “Net Profits Income” below.

After adding interest income of $2,091 and$5,717, deducting administration expense of $193,023,$236,691, and utilizing $230,974 of the expense reserve to pay Trust expenses, distributable income for the quarter ended September 30, 20172019 was $497,320,$0 or $0.012433$0.000000 per unit of beneficial interest. Administration expense for the quarter increased $5,131$11,487 as compared to the prior year quarter, primarily related to the timing of receipt and payment of Trust expenses and terms of professional services. Changes in interest income are attributable to fluctuations in net profits income and interest rates. For third quarter 2016,2018, distributable income was $791,920,$0 or $0.019798$0.000000 per unit.

Distributions to unitholders for the quarter ended September 30, 20172019 were:

Nine Months

For the nine months ended September 30, 2017,2019, net profits income was $4,236,724$369,458 compared with $1,516,605$1,590,949 for the same 20162018 period. This 179% increase77% decrease in net profits income is primarily the result of higher gas and oil prices ($10.6 million), partially offset by decreased gas and oil production ($2.54.1 million), net excessincreased development costs activity ($2.2 million), increased taxes, transportation and other costs ($1.31.1 million), increased production expenses ($0.9 million) and lower oil prices ($0.7 million), partially offset by higher gas prices ($4.1 million), net excess costs activity ($1.8 million), higher oil production ($1.5 million), and decreased overhead ($1.0 million), increased development costs ($0.7 million) and higher production expense ($0.20.4 million). See “Net Profits Income” below.

After adding interest income of $4,616 and$17,629, deducting administration expense of $707,060,$675,019, and utilizing $287,932 of the expense reserve to pay Trust expenses, distributable income for the nine months ended September 30, 20172019 was $3,534,280,$0 or $0.088357$0.000000 per unit of beneficial interest. Administration expense for the nine months ended September 30, 20172019 decreased $18,169$210,640 as compared to the same 20162018 period, primarily related to the timing of receipt and payment of Trust expenses and terms of professional services. Changes in interest income are attributable to fluctuations in net profits income and interest rates. For the nine months ended September 30, 2016,2018, distributable income was $791,920,$370,040 or $0.019798$0.009251 per unit.

Net Profits Income

Net profits income is recorded when received by the Trust, which is the month following receipt by XTO Energy, and generally two months after oil and gas production. Net profits income is generally affected by three major factors:

The following is a summary of the calculation of net profits income received by the Trust:

The following are explanations of significant variances on the underlying properties from third quarter 20162018 to third quarter 20172019 and from the first nine months of 20162018 to the comparable period in 2017:2019:

Sales Volumes

Gas

Gas sales volumes decreased 7%20% for both the third quarter and 16% for the nine-month period as compared with the same 2018 periods primarily because ofdue to natural production decline.decline, timing of cash receipts and change to account for a portion of gas sales as residue that were previously accounted for at the wellhead. This change does not affect the net profits income received by the Trust.

Oil

Oil sales volumes decreased 8%increased 113% for the third quarter and 14%30% for the nine-month period as compared with the same 2018 periods primarily because of natural production decline anddue to oil sales from new wells in Major County, Oklahoma, partially offset by the timing of cash receipts.receipts and natural production decline.

The estimated rate of natural production decline on the underlying oil and gas properties is approximately 6% to 8% a year.

Sales Prices

Gas

The third quarter 20172019 average gas price was $2.81$2.25 per Mcf, a 33% increase9% decrease from the third quarter 20162018 average gas price of $2.12$2.47 per Mcf. For the nine-month period, the average gas price increased 56%20% to $2.94$3.22 per Mcf in 20172019 from $1.88$2.69 per Mcf in 2016.2018. The third quarter 20172019 gas price is primarily related to production from May through July 2017,2019, when the average NYMEX price was $3.15$2.50 per MMBtu.

Oil

The third quarter 20172019 average oil price was $43.96$54.64 per Bbl, a 2% increasean 18% decrease from the third quarter 20162018 average oil price of $42.94$66.86 per Bbl. For the nine-month period, the average oil price increased 29%decreased 12% to $46.29$53.80 per Bbl in 20172019 from $36.02$61.17 per Bbl in 2016.2018. The third quarter 20172019 oil price is primarily related to production from May through July 2017,2019, when the average NYMEX price was $46.81$57.75 per Bbl.

Costs

Taxes, Transportation and Other

Taxes, transportation and other costs decreased 11%increased 3% for the third quarter and 22% for the nine-month period primarily because certain adjustments previously included in gas sales revenue are now recorded in this line item.

Production Expense

Production expense increased 17% for the third quarter primarily because of decreased gas deductions related to additional gathering fees includedreporting of expense well work activity previously reported in third quarter 2016,development costs and other higher operating expenses in Kansas and Wyoming, partially offset by lower operating expenses in Oklahoma. Production expense increased production taxes related to higher gas revenues. For further information on additional gathering fees included in third quarter 2016, see Note 7 to Condensed Financial Statements. Taxes, transportation and other costs increased 35%8% for the nine-month period primarily because of increased production taxes related to higher gas and oil revenues, increased gas deductions related to higher gathering fees and increased property taxes.

Production Expense

Productionreporting of expense increased 18% for the third quarter primarily because of increased salt water disposal, environmental costs, and other field goods and services. Production expense increased 2% for the nine-month period primarily because of increased salt water disposal and environmentalwell work activity previously reported in development costs, partially offset by decreasedlower labor and other field goods and services.costs due to timing of charges.

Development Costs

Development costs deducted are based on the current level of development expenditures, budgeted future development costs and the cumulative actual costs under (over) previous deductions. These development costs increased 407%26% for the third quarter and 82%20% for the nine-month period. The monthlyperiod as compared with the same 2018 periods. Subsequent to June 30, 2019, XTO Energy has advised the Trustee that the budgeted development cost accrual was fully depleted as of the July 2019 distribution. XTO Energy also had previously advised the Trustee that once the accrual was fully depleted, development costs were charged to the Trust as they are incurred for all conveyances. XTO Energy has advised the Trustee that drilling in Major County, Oklahoma is complete and resulted in cost overruns due to unforeseen expenditures that were charged to the Trust in the third quarter of 2019. XTO Energy has advised the Trustee that this monthly deduction will continue to be reevaluated by XTO Energyevaluated and revised as necessary. For further information on development costs, see Note 2 to Condensed Financial Statements.

Overhead

Overhead increased 29%7% for the third quarter and 16%decreased 5% for the nine-month period primarily becauseperiod. Overhead is charged by XTO Energy and other operators for administrative expenses incurred to support operations ofone-time reimbursements related to operated overhead corrections the underlying properties. Overhead fluctuates based on changes in 2016. For further informationthe active well count and drilling activity on overhead corrections, see Note 6 to Condensed Financial Statements.the underlying properties, as well as an annual cost level adjustment based on an industry index.

Excess Costs

If monthly costs exceed revenues for any conveyance, these excess costs must be recovered, with accrued interest, from future net proceeds of that conveyance and cannot reduce net profits income from another conveyance. Underlying cumulative excess costs for the Kansas, Oklahoma and Wyoming conveyances remaining as of September 30, 20172019 totaled $1.1$31.7 million ($25.4 million NPI), including accrued interest of $0.2 million. Cumulative excess costs for the NPI remaining as of September 30, 2017 totaled $0.9$0.7 million including accrued interest of $0.1 million.($0.5 million NPI). For further information on excess costs, including the excess cost balance and accrued interest by conveyance, see Note 5 to Condensed Financial Statements.

Impairment of Net Profits Interest

In light of lower long term prices used to develop projections of future cash flows, continued excess costs on two conveyances and zero distributions to unitholders for the quarter ended June 30, 2016, the Trustee concluded in the second quarter of 2016 that the events or circumstances indicated the carrying value may not be recoverable and an assessment of the forecasted net cash flows was performed for the NPI. The fair value of the NPI was developed using estimates for future oil and gas production attributable to the Trust, future crude oil and natural gas commodity prices published by third-party industry experts (adjusted for basis differentials), estimated taxes, development and operating expenses, and a risk-adjusted discount rate. The result of the assessment indicated that the estimated undiscounted future net cash flows from the NPI were below the carrying value of the NPI. The NPI was written down to its fair value of $28.8 million, resulting in a $57.3 million impairment charged directly to trust corpus, which did not affect distributable income. There was no impairment of the NPI during the quarter ended September 30, 2017.

Marketing

XTO Energy has advised the Trustee that, effective April 1, 2017, Cross Timbers Energy Services, Inc. (“CTES”), a wholly owned marketing subsidiary of XTO Energy, has assigned all gas sales contracts for production from the underlying properties to XTO Energy. XTO Energy will directly market and sell the gas to third parties. XTO Energy has advised the Trustee that there are no changes to the terms of the contracts related to the assignment and no impact on Trust distributions.

For further information regarding natural gas sales from the underlying properties to affiliates of XTO Energy, see Significant Properties, under Item 2, Properties and Note 7 to the Financial Statements under Item 8, Financial Statements and Supplementary Data of the Trust’s Annual Report on Form10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016.

Contingencies

For information on contingencies, see Note 4 to Condensed Financial Statements.

Forward-Looking Statements

Statements in this report relating to future plans, predictions, eventsproduction, excess costs, litigation, arbitration, or conditionsliquidity, financing or regulatory or court decisions are forward-looking statements. All statements other than statements of historical fact included in this Form10-Q, including, without limitation, statements regarding the net profits interests, underlying properties, development activities, annual and monthly development, production and other costs and expenses, estimated rates of natural production decline, monthly development cost deductions, oil and gas prices and differentials to NYMEX prices, estimated changes in expenses, supply levels, future drilling, workover and restimulation plans, the outcome of litigation or settlement discussions and the impact on Trust proceeds, distributions to unitholders, and industry and market conditions, are forward-looking statements that are subject to risks and uncertainties, which areincluding those detailed in Part I, Item 1A of the Trust’s Annual Report on Form10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016,2018, which is incorporated by this reference as though fully set forth herein. XTO Energy and the Trustee assume no duty to update these statements as of any future date.

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk.

There have beenNot applicable. Upon qualifying as a smaller reporting company, this information is no material changes in the Trust’s market risks from the information disclosed in Part II, longer required.

Item 7A of the Trust’s Annual Report on Form10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016.4. Controls and Procedures.

As of the end of the period covered by this report, the Trustee carried out an evaluation of the effectiveness of the Trust’s disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to Exchange Act Rules13a-15 and15d-15. Based upon that evaluation, the Trustee concluded that the Trust’s disclosure controls and procedures are effective in recording, processing, summarizing and reporting, on a timely basis, information required to be disclosed by the Trust in the reports that it files or submits under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and are effective in ensuring that information required to be disclosed by the Trust in the reports that it files or submits under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is accumulated and communicated to the Trustee to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. In its evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures, the Trustee has relied, to the extent considered reasonable, on information provided by XTO Energy. There has not been any change in the Trust’s internal control over financial reporting during the period covered by this report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Trust’s internal control over financial reporting.

PART II—II - OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings.

ReferRoyalty Class Action and Arbitration

As previously disclosed, XTO Energy advised the Trustee that it reached a settlement with the plaintiffs in theChieftain class action royalty case. On July 27, 2018 the final plan of allocation was approved by the court. Based on the final plan of allocation XTO Energy has advised the Trustee that it believes approximately $24.3 million in additional production costs should be allocated to Note 4the Trust. On May 2, 2018, the Trustee submitted a demand for arbitration seeking a declaratory judgment that theChieftain settlement is not a production cost and that XTO Energy is prohibited from charging the settlement as a production cost under the conveyance or otherwise reducing the Trust’s payments now or in the future as a result of theChieftain litigation. The hearing on the claims related to theChieftain settlement has been rescheduled for January 20, 2020. Other Trustee claims related to disputed amounts on the computation of the Trust’s net proceeds for 2014 through 2016 were bifurcated from the issues regarding XTO’s right to charge theChieftain settlement as a production cost and will be heard at a later date, which is still to be determined.

If the approximately $24.3 million allocated portion of theChieftainsettlement results in an adjustment to the Trust’s share of net proceeds, it would result in additional excess costs under the Oklahoma conveyance that would likely result in no distributions under the Oklahoma conveyance for several years, or more depending on the results of operations of the underlying properties, while these additional excess costs are recovered.

Other Lawsuits and Governmental Proceedings

Certain of the underlying properties are involved in various other lawsuits and governmental proceedings arising in the ordinary course of business. XTO Energy has advised the Trustee that, based on the information available at this Quarterly Reportstage of the various proceedings, it does not believe that the ultimate resolution of these claims will have a material effect on Form10-Q for informationthe financial position or liquidity of the Trust, but may have an effect on legal proceedings.annual distributable income.

Item 1A. Risk Factors.

There have been no material changes in the risk factors disclosed under Part I, Item 1A of the Trust’s Annual Report on Form10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016.2018.

Item 6. Exhibits.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this Report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

2123