UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM10-Q

(X) QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)

OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended SeptemberJune 30, 20172019

OR (  ) TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)

OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from            to            .

Commission File Number000-52602

CERES TACTICAL COMMODITY L.P.

 

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

 

New York

  

20-2718952

(State or other jurisdiction of

(I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization)

  

(I.R.S. Employer

Identification No.)

c/o Ceres Managed Futures LLC

522 Fifth Avenue

New York, New York 10036

 

(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)

(855)672-4468

 

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Title of each classTrading Symbol(s)Name of each exchange on which registered
N/AN/AN/A

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

YesX     No  

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of RegulationS-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).

YesX     No  

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, anon-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company” and “emerging growth company” in Rule12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

 

Large accelerated filer      Accelerated filer      

Non-accelerated filerX

Smaller reporting company      

Emerging growth company    

  

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act.    

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

Yes  NoX

As of OctoberJuly 31, 2017, 63,033.20872019, 75,958.5947 Limited Partnership Class A Redeemable Units were outstanding, 600.0580 Limited Partnership Class D Redeemable Units were outstanding and 0.000099.2020 Limited Partnership Class Z Redeemable Units were outstanding.


PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1.Financial Statements.

Ceres Tactical Commodity L.P.

Statements of Financial Condition

 

                                                
  September 30,  December 31,
  2017  2016
  (Unaudited)  

 

                                          
  June 30,
2019
     (Unaudited)    
      December 31,    
2018

Assets:

        

Investment in the Master(1), at fair value

    $87,200,625     $105,585,464 

Cash at MS&Co.

   241,057    231,090 

Cash at bank

   631    217 

Investment in the Fund(s)(1), at fair value

    $28,787,528     $5,489,732 

Redemptions receivable from the Fund(s)

   1,611,532    21,653 
  

 

  

 

Equity in trading account:

    

Unrestricted cash

   71,471,528    46,452,179 

Restricted cash

   5,416,200    7,608,136 

Net unrealized appreciation on open futures contracts

   -        1,757,511 

Net unrealized appreciation on open forward contracts

   125,127    -     

Options purchased, at fair value (premiums paid $1,504,985 and $555,793 at June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018, respectively)

   1,081,048    305,214 
  

 

  

 

Total equity in trading account

   78,093,903    56,123,040 
  

 

  

 

Interest receivable

   128,075    94,727 
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

Total assets

    $87,442,313     $105,816,771     $108,621,038     $61,729,152 
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

Liabilities and Partners’ Capital:

        

Liabilities:

        

Net unrealized depreciation on open futures contracts

    $936,830     $-     

Net unrealized depreciation on open forward contracts

   -        364,117 

Options written, at fair value (premiums received $1,548,254 and $506,194 at June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018, respectively)

   1,047,272    409,571 

Accrued expenses:

        

Ongoing selling agent fees

    $143,992     $176,361    174,946    99,660 

Management fees

   90,687    109,799    131,638    82,317 

General Partner fees

   72,550    87,839    66,408    50,530 

Incentive fees

   137,039    957,011 

Professional fees

   238,291    233,661    209,864    220,343 

Redemptions payable to Limited Partners

   1,742,355    1,776,067    2,795,831    1,326,737 
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

Total liabilities

   2,287,875    2,383,727    5,499,828    3,510,286 
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

Partners’ Capital:

        

General Partner, Class A, 0.0000 and 904.7535 Redeemable Units outstanding at September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively

   -        1,208,476 

General Partner, Class Z, 1,054.5480 and 0.0000 Redeemable Units outstanding at September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively

   1,042,378    -     

Limited Partners, Class A, 64,673.5537 and 76,532.7527 Redeemable Units outstanding at September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively

   84,112,060    102,224,568 

General Partner, Class Z, 1,118.7550 and 745.0230 Redeemable Units outstanding at June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018, respectively

   1,168,131    755,325 

Limited Partners, Class A, 76,333.6607 and 43,713.9067 Redeemable Units outstanding at June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018, respectively

   101,227,212    56,857,034 

Limited Partners, Class D, 600.0580 Redeemable Units outstanding at June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018

   622,287    606,507 

Limited Partners, Class Z, 99.2020 and 0.0000 Redeemable Units outstanding at June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018, respectively

   103,580    -     
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

Total partners’ capital (net asset value)

   85,154,438    103,433,044    103,121,210    58,218,866 
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

Total liabilities and partners’ capital

    $87,442,313     $105,816,771     $108,621,038     $61,729,152 
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

Net asset value per Redeemable Unit:

        

Class A

    $1,300.56     $1,335.70     $1,326.11     $1,300.66 
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

Class D

    $1,037.04     $1,010.75 
  

 

  

 

Class Z

    $988.46     $-         $1,044.13     $1,013.83 
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

(1)

(1)

Defined in Note 1.

See accompanying notes to financial statements.

 

1


Ceres Tactical Commodity L.P.

Condensed Schedule of Investments

June 30, 2019

(Unaudited)

                                                               
       Number of    
Contracts 
      Fair Value     % of Partners’
Capital
 

Futures Contracts Purchased

     

Energy

   12,668     $(5,426,917  (5.26)  % 

Grains

   485    (218,978  (0.21

Livestock

   181    (336,230  (0.33

Metals

   149    243,565   0.24 

Softs

   244    280,272   0.27 
    

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total futures contracts purchased

     (5,458,288  (5.29
    

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Futures Contracts Sold

     

Energy

   9,599    4,881,100   4.73 

Grains

   698    215,580   0.21 

Livestock

   202    349,764   0.34 

Metals

   99    (773,084  (0.75

Softs

   284    (151,902  (0.15
    

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total futures contracts sold

     4,521,458   4.38 
    

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net unrealized depreciation on open futures contracts

      $(936,830  (0.91)  % 
    

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Unrealized Appreciation on Open Forward Contracts

     

Metals

   666     $1,224,388   1.19   % 
    

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total unrealized appreciation on open forward contracts

     1,224,388   1.19 
    

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Unrealized Depreciation on Open Forward Contracts

     

Metals

   564    (1,099,261  (1.07
    

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total unrealized depreciation on open forward contracts

     (1,099,261  (1.07
    

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net unrealized appreciation on open forward contracts

      $125,127   0.12   % 
    

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Options Purchased

     

Calls

     

Energy

   836     $283,530   0.27   % 

Metals

   365    269,087   0.26 

Softs

   174    54,241   0.05 

Puts

     

Energy

   12    14,481   0.01 

Metals

   135    459,709   0.46 
    

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total options purchased (premiums paid $1,504,985)

      $1,081,048   1.05   % 
    

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Options Written

     

Calls

     

Energy

   12     $(8,705  (0.01)  % 

Metals

   379    (318,687  (0.31

Softs

   18    (34,155  (0.03

Puts

     

Energy

   12    (7,342  (0.01

Grains

   35    (26,250  (0.03

Livestock

   35    (52,850  (0.05

Metals

   158    (471,399  (0.46

Softs

   128    (127,884  (0.12
    

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total options written (premiums received $1,548,254)

      $(1,047,272  (1.02)  % 
    

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
Investment in the Funds         Fair Value         % of Partners’
Capital
 

CMF NL Master Fund LLC

      $6,092,681   5.91   % 

CMF Aquantum Master Fund LLC

     22,694,847   22.01 
    

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total investment in the Funds

      $28,787,528   27.92   % 
    

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

See accompanying notes to financial statements.

2


Ceres Tactical Commodity L.P.

Condensed Schedule of Investments

December 31, 2018

                                                               
       Number of    
Contracts
  Fair Value % of Partners’
Capital
 

Futures Contracts Purchased

     

Currencies

   35     $13,419   0.02  % 

Energy

   1,827    (3,537,375  (6.08

Grains

   269    (34,732  (0.06

Livestock

   424    (133,210  (0.22

Metals

   132    (17,816  (0.03

Softs

   284    (15,437  (0.03
    

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total futures contracts purchased

     (3,725,151  (6.40
    

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Futures Contracts Sold

     

Energy

   2,168    5,226,770   8.98 

Grains

   306    125,329   0.22 

Livestock

   501    197,475   0.34 

Metals

   127    (151,374  (0.26

Softs

   367    84,462   0.14 
    

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total futures contracts sold

     5,482,662   9.42 
    

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net unrealized appreciation on open futures contracts

      $1,757,511   3.02  % 
    

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Unrealized Appreciation on Open Forward Contracts

     

Metals

   677     $2,203,511   3.78  % 
    

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total unrealized appreciation on open forward contracts

     2,203,511   3.78 
    

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Unrealized Depreciation on Open Forward Contracts

     

Metals

   774    (2,567,628  (4.41
    

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total unrealized depreciation on open forward contracts

     (2,567,628  (4.41
    

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net unrealized depreciation on open forward contracts

      $(364,117  (0.63) % 
    

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Options Purchased

     

Calls

     

Grains

   110     $27,500   0.05  % 

Metals

   244    37,084   0.06 

Puts

     

Energy

   36    35,640   0.06 

Livestock

   62    19,620   0.03 

Metals

   94    185,370   0.32 
    

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total options purchased (premiums paid $555,793)

      $305,214   0.52  % 
    

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Options Written

     

Calls

     

Energy

   44     $(34,760  (0.06) % 

Livestock

   18    (17,820  (0.03

Metals

   141    (13,833  (0.02

Softs

   27    (44,820  (0.08

Puts

     

Metals

   117    (225,236  (0.39

Softs

   104    (73,102  (0.12
    

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total options written (premiums received $506,194)

      $(409,571  (0.70) % 
    

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
Investment in the Fund         Fair Value         % of Partners’
Capital
 

CMF Harbour Square Master Fund LLC

      $5,489,732   9.43  % 
    

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total investment in the Fund

      $5,489,732   9.43  % 
    

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

See accompanying notes to financial statements.

3


Ceres Tactical Commodity L.P.

Statements of Income and Expenses

(Unaudited)

 

                                                                                                                                                                                    
  Three Months Ended
September 30,
 Nine Months Ended
September 30,
  Three Months Ended
June  30,
 Six Months Ended
June  30,
  2017 2016 2017 2016  2019 2018 2019 2018

Investment Income:

          

Interest income allocated from the Master

    $207,396    $63,429    $514,374    $163,316 

Interest income

    $517,054    $160,343    $1,080,943    $294,601 

Interest income allocated from the Fund(s)

   66,360   102,901   92,772   197,874 
  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total investment income

   583,414   263,244   1,173,715   492,475 
  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Expenses:

          

Expenses allocated from the Master

   414,873  562,201  1,128,637  1,885,207 

Expenses allocated from the Fund(s)

   84,578   95,188   121,800   172,731 

Clearing fees related to direct investments

   317,149   141,217   652,877   275,664 

Ongoing selling agent fees

   441,019  584,929  1,457,312  1,856,851    538,610   333,832   1,081,820   674,383 

Management fees

   277,716  364,200  918,166  1,156,392    403,630   258,712   808,405   518,982 

General Partner fees

   222,173  291,360  734,534  925,115    204,607   168,010   411,205   339,474 

Incentive fees

   (84,547  341,419   287,313   415,320 

Professional fees

   89,811  106,422  279,958  322,512    112,186   87,538   227,146   178,194 
  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total expenses

   1,445,592  1,909,112  4,518,607  6,146,077    1,576,213   1,425,916   3,590,566   2,574,748 
  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net investment loss

   (1,238,196 (1,845,683 (4,004,233 (5,982,761   (992,799  (1,162,672  (2,416,851  (2,082,273
  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Trading Results:

          

Net gains (losses) on investment in the Master:

     

Net realized gains (losses) on closed contracts allocated from the Master

   2,556,222  (1,064,122 1,605,458  17,307,335 

Net change in unrealized gains (losses) on open contracts allocated from the Master

   631,153  (5,130,319 (428,942 (2,115,804

Net gains (losses) on trading of commodity interests and investment in the Fund(s):

     

Net realized gains (losses) on closed contracts

   2,031,057   2,882,877   7,423,756   3,458,066 

Net realized gains (losses) on closed contracts allocated from the Fund(s)

   415,975   144,570   528,957   865,514 

Net change in unrealized gains (losses) on open contracts

   (1,098,815  (359,919  (1,973,517  (327,453

Net change in unrealized gains (losses) on open contracts allocated from the Fund(s)

   (1,382,927  (642,747  (1,380,357  (338,694
  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total trading results

   3,187,375  (6,194,441 1,176,516  15,191,531    (34,710  2,024,781   4,598,839   3,657,433 
  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income (loss)

    $1,949,179    $(8,040,124   $(2,827,717   $9,208,770     $(1,027,509   $862,109    $2,181,988    $1,575,160 
  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income (loss) allocation by Class:

     

Net income (loss) per Redeemable Unit:*

     

Class A

    $1,921,714    $(8,040,124   $(2,812,508   $9,208,770     $(13.19   $16.22    $25.45    $29.39 
  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Class Z

    $27,465    $-        $(15,209   $-     
  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net asset value per Redeemable Unit:

     

Class A (64,673.5537 and 82,436.3352 Redeemable Units outstanding at September 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively)

    $1,300.56    $1,368.89    $1,300.56    $1,368.89 
  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Class Z (1,054.5480 and 0.0000 Redeemable Units outstanding at September 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively)

    $988.46    $-        $988.46    $-     
  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income (loss) per Redeemable Unit:*

     

Class A

    $27.90    $(94.23)     $(35.14   $100.51 

Class D

    $(7.02   $-        $26.29    $-     
  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Class Z

    $26.04    $-        $(11.54   $-         $(5.09   $17.49    $30.30    $32.48 
  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted average Redeemable Units outstanding:

          

Class A

   67,153.9024  84,661.2275  73,977.0435  92,423.9446    79,589.1810   50,732.9224   80,632.2470   51,862.9645 
  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Class D

   600.0580   -       600.0580   -     
  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Class Z

   1,054.5480   -      1,195.1252   -        1,317.2010   745.0230   1,399.9113   770.4875 
  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

*

*

Represents the change in net asset value per Redeemable Unit during the period.

See accompanying notes to financial statements.

 

24


Ceres Tactical Commodity L.P.

Statements of Changes in Partners’ Capital

For the NineThree and Six Months Ended SeptemberJune 30, 20172019 and 20162018

(Unaudited)

 

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        
  Class A Class Z Total  Class A Class D  Class Z Total
  Amount   Redeemable Units   Amount   Redeemable Units   Amount   Redeemable Units    Amount Redeemable
Units
 Amount Redeemable
Units
  Amount Redeemable
Units
 Amount Redeemable
Units

Partners’ Capital, December 31, 2016

    $103,433,044  77,437.5062   $-       -        $103,433,044  77,437.5062 

Partners’ Capital, December 31, 2017

    $68,946,282   54,475.3577    $-       -         $769,492   795.9520    $69,715,774   55,271.3097 

Subscriptions - Limited Partners

   1,565,000   1,218.5560   -       -        -       -       1,565,000   1,218.5560 

Redemptions - General Partner

   -       -       -       -        (50,000  (50.9290  (50,000  (50.9290

Redemptions - Limited Partners

   (8,758,018  (6,811.9730  -       -        -       -       (8,758,018  (6,811.9730

Net income (loss)

   1,550,196   -       -       -        24,964   -       1,575,160   -     
  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Partners’ Capital, June 30, 2018

    $63,303,460   48,881.9407    $-       -         $744,456   745.0230    $64,047,916   49,626.9637 
  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Partners’ Capital, March 31, 2018

    $65,247,295   51,021.9667    $-       -         $731,423   745.0230    $65,978,718   51,766.9897 

Subscriptions - Limited Partners

   1,565,000   1,218.5560   -       -        -       -       1,565,000   1,218.5560 

Redemptions - Limited Partners

   (4,357,911  (3,358.5820  -       -        -       -       (4,357,911  (3,358.5820

Net income (loss)

   849,076   -       -       -        13,033   -       862,109   -     
  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Partners’ Capital, June 30, 2018

    $63,303,460   48,881.9407    $-       -         $744,456   745.0230    $64,047,916   49,626.9637 
  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  Class A Class D  Class Z Total
  Amount Redeemable
Units
 Amount Redeemable
Units
  Amount Redeemable
Units
 Amount Redeemable
Units

Partners’ Capital, December 31, 2018

    $56,857,034   43,713.9067    $606,507   600.0580     $755,325   745.0230    $58,218,866   45,058.9877 

Subscriptions - General Partner

   -       -      1,307,587  1,307.5870  1,307,587  1,307.5870    -       -       -       -        680,750   671.4640   680,750   671.4640 

Subscriptions - Limited Partners

   8,129,804  6,086.9360   -       -      8,129,804  6,086.9360    52,019,698   39,975.1700   -       -        100,000   99.2020   52,119,698   40,074.3720 

Redemptions - General Partner

   (1,208,476 (904.7535 (250,000 (253.0390 (1,458,476 (1,157.7925   -       -       -       -        (315,025  (297.7320  (315,025  (297.7320

Redemptions - Limited Partners

   (23,429,804 (17,946.1350  -       -      (23,429,804 (17,946.1350   (9,765,067  (7,355.4160  -       -        -       -       (9,765,067  (7,355.4160

Net income (loss)

   (2,812,508  -      (15,209  -      (2,827,717  -        2,115,547   -       15,780   -        50,661   -       2,181,988   -     
  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Partners’ Capital, September 30, 2017

    $84,112,060  64,673.5537   $1,042,378  1,054.5480    $85,154,438  65,728.1017 

Partners’ Capital, June 30, 2019

    $101,227,212   76,333.6607    $622,287   600.0580     $1,271,711   1,217.9570    $103,121,210   78,151.6757 
  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Partners’ Capital, December 31, 2015

    $132,292,532  104,300.7562   $-       -        $132,292,532  104,300.7562 

Partners’ Capital, March 31, 2019

    $107,234,232   80,067.2267    $626,494   600.0580     $1,590,289   1,515.6890    $109,451,015   82,182.9737 

Subscriptions - Limited Partners

   2,559,667  2,016.1730   -       -      2,559,667  2,016.1730    976,785   728.4280   -       -        -       -       976,785   728.4280 

Redemptions - General Partner

   (531,594 (406.1910  -       -      (531,594 (406.1910   -       -       -       -        (315,025  (297.7320  (315,025  (297.7320

Redemptions - Limited Partners

   (30,683,346 (23,474.4030  -       -      (30,683,346 (23,474.4030   (5,964,056  (4,461.9940  -       -        -       -       (5,964,056  (4,461.9940

Net income (loss)

   9,208,770   -       -       -      9,208,770   -        (1,019,749  -       (4,207  -        (3,553  -       (1,027,509  -     
  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Partners’ Capital, September 30, 2016

    $  112,846,029  82,436.3352   $-       -        $  112,846,029  82,436.3352 

Partners’ Capital, June 30, 2019

    $101,227,212   76,333.6607    $622,287         600.0580     $1,271,711   1,217.9570    $103,121,210   78,151.6757 
  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

See accompanying notes to financial statements.

 

35


Ceres Tactical Commodity L.P.

Notes to Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

 

1.

Organization:

Ceres Tactical Commodity L.P. (formerly, Managed Futures Premier Aventis II L.P.) (the “Partnership”) is a limited partnership organized on April 20, 2005 under the partnership laws of the State of New York to engage, directly orand indirectly, in the speculative trading of commodity interests on U.S. and international futures, options on futures and forward markets. The Partnership may also engage, directly or indirectly, in swap transactions and other derivative transactions with the approval of the General Partner (as defined below). Initially, the Partnership’s investment strategy focused on energy and energy-related investments. While the Partnership is expected to continue to have significant exposure to energy and energy-related markets, such trading will no longer be the Partnership’s primary focus. Therefore, the Partnership’s past trading performance will not necessarily be indicative of future results. The sectors traded include energy, grains, livestock, metals and softs. The commodity interests that are traded by the Partnership, directly or indirectly through its investment in MB Master Fund L.P. (the “Master”),the Funds (as defined below) are volatile and involve a high degree of market risk. The General Partner may also determine to invest up to all of the Partnership’s assets (directly or indirectly through its investment in the Master)Funds) in United States (“U.S.”) Treasury bills and/or money market mutual funds, including money market mutual funds managed by Morgan Stanley or its affiliates. During the initial offering period, the Partnership sold 11,925 redeemable units of limited partnership interest in the Partnership (“Redeemable Units”). The Partnership commenced trading on September 6, 2005. The Partnership privately and continuously offers Redeemable Units to qualified investors. There is no maximum number of Redeemable Units that may be sold by the Partnership.

Ceres Managed Futures LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, acts as the general partner (the “General Partner”) and commodity pool operator of the Partnership. AsPartnership and is the trading manager (the “Trading Manager”) of January 1, 2017, theNL Master (as defined below) and Aquantum Master (as defined below). The General Partner becamewas also the Trading Manager of Harbour Square Master (as defined below). The General Partner is a wholly ownedwholly-owned subsidiary of Morgan Stanley Domestic Holdings, Inc. (“MSD Holdings”). MSD Holdings is ultimately owned by Morgan Stanley. Morgan Stanley is a publicly held company whose shares are listed on the New York Stock Exchange. Morgan Stanley is engaged in various financial services and other businesses. Prior to January 1, 2017, the General Partner was a wholly owned subsidiary

As of Morgan Stanley Smith Barney Holdings LLC. AllJune 30, 2019, all trading decisions are made for the Partnership are made by Millburn Ridgefield Corporation (“Millburn”), Ospraie Management, LLC (“Ospraie”), Aquantum GmbH (“Aquantum”), Pan Capital Management L.P. (“Pan”), and Northlander Commodity Advisors LLP (“Northlander”) (each, an “Advisor” and, collectively, the “Advisors”), each, a registered commodity trading advisor. On November 30, 2018, the Partnership fully redeemed its investment in MB Master Fund L.P. (“MB Master”). Also effective November 30, 2018, Aventis Asset Management, LLC (“Aventis” or) ceased to act as a commodity trading advisor to the “Advisor”).

DuringPartnership. On March 31, 2019, the reporting periods ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, the Partnership’s and the Master’s commodity broker was Morgan Stanley & Co.Partnership fully redeemed its investment in CMF Harbour Square Master Fund LLC (“MS&Co.”Harbour Square Master”),. Also effective March 31, 2019, Harbour Square Capital Management LLC (“Harbour Square”) ceased to act as a registered futures commission merchant. The Partnership andcommodity trading advisor to the Master also depositPartnership. Each Advisor is allocated a portion of their cash in non-trading accounts at JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.

Effective February 28, 2017, the Partnership’s assets to manage. The Partnership changed its name from Managed Futures Premier Aventis II L.P. to Ceres Tactical Commodity L.P.

On February 1, 2013,invests the Partnership allocated substantially allportion of its capitalassets allocated to each of the Advisors either directly, through individually managed accounts, or indirectly through its investment in the Funds. References herein to the Master, a limited partnership organized under“Advisors” may also include, as relevant, Harbour Square and Aventis. The Advisors are not affiliated with one another, are not affiliated with the partnership laws of the State of Delaware. The Master permits accounts managed by Aventis using its Aventis Diversified Commodity Strategy, a proprietary, discretionary trading system, to invest together in one trading vehicle. The General Partner is also the general partner of the Master. Individual and pooled accounts currently managed by the Advisor, including the Partnership, are permitted to be limited partners of the Master. The General Partner and MS&Co. and are not responsible for the Advisor believe that trading through this master/feeder structure should promote efficiency and economy in the trading process. Expenses to investors as a resultorganization or operation of the investment in the Master are approximately the same as if the Partnership traded directly and redemption rights are not affected.

Generally, a limited partner in the Master withdraws all or part of its capital contribution and undistributed profits, if any, from the Master as of the end of any month (the “Redemption Date”) after a request has been made to the General Partner at least three days in advance of the Redemption Date. Such withdrawals are classified as a liability when the limited partner in the Master elects to redeem and informs the Master. However, a limited partner in the Master may request a withdrawal as of the end of any day if such request is received by the General Partner at least three days in advance of the proposed withdrawal day.

The General Partner is not aware of any material changes to the Aventis Diversified Commodity Strategy during the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2017.

4


Ceres Tactical Commodity L.P.

Notes to Financial Statements

(Unaudited)Partnership.

As of November 11, 2016,June 13, 2018, the Partnership began offering twothree classes of limited partnership interests, Class A Redeemable Units, Class D Redeemable Units and Class Z Redeemable Units. All Redeemable Units issued prior to October 31, 2016 were deemed “Class A Redeemable Units.” Class Z Redeemable Units were first issued on January 1, 2017. The rights, liabilities, risks and fees associated with investment in the Class A Redeemable Units were not changed. Class D Redeemable Units were first issued on July 1, 2018. The rights, liabilities, risks and fees associated with investment in the Class A Redeemable Units and Class Z Redeemable Units were not changed. Class A Redeemable Units, Class D Redeemable Units and Class Z Redeemable Units will each be referred to as a “Class” and collectively referred to as the “Classes.” The rights, liabilities, risks, and fees associated with investment in the Class A Redeemable Units were not changed.and Class AD Redeemable Units are available to taxable U.S. individuals and institutions, U.S. tax exempt individuals and institutions andnon-U.S. investors. Class Z Redeemable Units are offered to limited partners who receive advisory services from Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC (doing business as Morgan Stanley Wealth Management) (“Morgan Stanley Wealth Management”) and may also be offered to certain employees of Morgan Stanley and/or its subsidiaries (and their family members). Class A Redeemable Units, Class D Redeemable Units and Class Z Redeemable Units are identical, except that Class A Redeemable Units are subject to a monthly ongoing selling agent fee equal to 1/12 of 2.00% (a 2.00% annual rate) of the net assets of Class A as of the end of each month, which differs from the Class D Redeemable Units monthly ongoing selling agent fee of 1/12 of 0.75% (a 0.75% annual rate) of the net assets of Class D as of the end of each month. Class Z Redeemable Units are not subject to a monthly ongoing selling agent fee. Class Z Redeemable Units were first issued on January 1, 2017.

At September

6


Ceres Tactical Commodity L.P.

Notes to Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

During the reporting periods ended June 30, 2017,2019 and 2018, the Partnership owned approximately 88.3%Partnership’s/Funds’ commodity broker was Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC (“MS&Co.”), a registered futures commission merchant. During prior periods included in this report, the Partnership/Funds deposited a portion of the Master. At December 31, 2016, the Partnership owned approximately 88.1% of the Master. It istheir cash innon-trading bank accounts at JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.

Millburn, Ospraie and Pan directly trade the Partnership’s intentionassets allocated to continue to invest substantially all of its assetseach Advisor through managed accounts in the Master. The performancename of the Partnership is directly affected by the performance of the Master.

The Master’s trading of futures, forward, swappursuant to Millburn’s Commodity Program, Ospraie’s Commodity Program and option contracts, if applicable, on commodities is done primarily on U.S. commodity exchanges and foreign commodity exchanges. The Master engages in such trading through a commodity brokerage account maintained with MS&Co. The Master’s Statements of Financial Condition, Condensed Schedules of Investments and Statements of Income and Expenses and Changes in Partners’ Capital are included herein.Pan’s Energy Trading Program, respectively.

The Partnership, CMF NL Master Fund LLC (“NL Master”) and theCMF Aquantum Master Fund LLC (“Aquantum Master”) have entered, and (prior to their respective terminations) Harbour Square Master and MB Master had entered, into futures brokerage account agreements with MS&Co. NL Master and Aquantum Master are collectively referred to as the “Funds.” References herein to the Funds may also include, as relevant, Harbour Square Master and MB Master. The Partnership, directly and through its investment in the Master,Funds, pays MS&Co. (or will reimburse MS&Co. if previously paid) its allocable share of all trading fees for the clearing and, where applicable, the execution of transactions as well as exchange, user,give-up, floor brokerage and National Futures Association fees (collectively, the “clearing fees”).

The Partnership has also entered into a selling agreement (as amended, the “Selling Agreement”) with Morgan Stanley Wealth Management. Pursuant to the Selling Agreement,General Partner fees, management fees, incentive fees and professional fees of the Partnership pays Morgan Stanley Wealth Management a monthly ongoing selling agent fee equalare allocated proportionally to 2.00% per yeareach Class based on the net asset value of the Partnership’s adjusted month-end net assets of Class A Redeemable Units. The ongoing selling agent fee received by Morgan Stanley Wealth Management is shared with the properly registered or exempted financial advisors of Morgan Stanley Wealth Management who have sold Class A Redeemable Units in the Partnership. Class Z Redeemable Units are not subject to a monthly ongoing selling agent fee.each Class.

In July 2015, the General Partner delegated certain administrative functions to SS&C Technologies, Inc., a Delaware corporation, currently doing business as SS&C GlobeOp (the “Administrator”). Pursuant to a master services agreement, the Administrator furnishes certain administrative, accounting, regulatory reporting, tax and other services as agreed from time to time. In addition, the Administrator maintains certain books and records of the Partnership. The cost of retaining the Administrator is allocated among the pools operated by the General Partner, including the Partnership.

 

2.

Basis of Presentation and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies:

The accompanying financial statements and accompanying notes are unaudited but, in the opinion of the General Partner, include all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments, necessary for a fair presentation of the Partnership’s financial condition at SeptemberJune 30, 2017,2019 and the results of its operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 and changes in partners’ capital for the ninethree and six months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20172019 and 2016.2018. These financial statements present the results forof interim periods and do not include all disclosures normally provided in annual financial statements. These financial statements should be read together with the financial statements and notes included in the Partnership’s Annual Report on Form10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) for the year ended December 31, 2016.2018. The December 31, 20162018 information has been derived from the audited financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2016.2018.

Due to the nature of commodity trading, the results of operations for the interim periods presented should not be considered indicative of the results that may be expected for the entire year.

Use of Estimates.The preparation of financial statements and accompanying notes in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) requires the General Partner to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, income and expenses, and related disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities in the financial statements and accompanying notes. As a result, actual results could differ from these estimates, and those differences could be material.

5


Ceres Tactical Commodity L.P.

Notes to Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

Profit AllocationAllocation.. The General Partner and each limited partner of the Partnership share in the profits and losses of the Partnership in proportion to the amount of Partnership interest owned by each, except that no limited partner is liable for obligations of the Partnership in excess of its capital contributioncontributions and profits, if any, net of distributions or redemptions and losses, if any.

Statement of Cash Flows.The Partnership has not provided a Statement of Cash Flows, as permitted by Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 230,“Statement of Cash Flows.” The Statements of Changes in Partners’ Capital is included herein, and as of and for the periods ended SeptemberJune 30, 20172019 and 2016,2018, the Partnership carried no debt and substantially all of the Partnership’s and the Funds’ investments were carried at fair value and classified as Level 1 and Level 2 measurements.

7


Ceres Tactical Commodity L.P.

Notes to Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

Partnership’s Investment.Investment in the Funds.The Partnership carries its investment in the MasterFunds based on the Partnership’s (1) net contribution to the MasterFunds and (2) its allocated share of the undistributed profits and losses, including realized gains or losses and net change in unrealized gains or losses, of the Master. The valuation of the Master’s investments, including the classification within the fair value hierarchy of the investmentsFunds.

Partnership’s/Funds’ Derivative Investments. All commodity interests held by the Master, are described in Note 5, “Fair Value Measurements.”

Master’s Investments.All commodity interests of the Master,Partnership/Funds, including derivative financial instruments and derivative commodity instruments, are held for trading purposes. The commodity interests are recorded on the trade date and open contracts are recorded at fair value (as described in Note 5, “Fair Value Measurements”) at the measurement date. Investments in commodity interests denominated in foreign currencies are translated into U.S. dollars at the exchange rates prevailing at the measurement date. Gains or losses are realized when contracts are liquidated and are determined using thefirst-in,first-out method. UnrealizedNet unrealized gains or losses on open contracts are included as a component of equity in trading account in the Master’sPartnership’s/Funds’ Statements of Financial Condition. Net realized gains or losses and net change in unrealized gains or losses are included in the Master’sPartnership’s/Funds’ Statements of Income and Expenses and Changes in Partners’ Capital. Expenses.

The Master doesPartnership/Funds do not isolate the portion of the results of operations arising from the effect of changes in foreign exchange rates on investments fromdue to fluctuations from changes in market prices of investments held. Such fluctuations are included in total trading results in the Master’sPartnership’s/Funds’ Statements of Income and Expenses and Changes in Partners’ Capital.Expenses.

Master’sPartnership’s Cash. The Master’sPartnership’s restricted cash is equal to the cash portion of assets on deposit to meet margin requirements, as determined by the exchange or counterparty, and required by MS&Co. At June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018, the amount of cash held for margin requirements was $5,416,200 and $7,608,136, respectively. Cash that is not classified as restricted cash is therefore classified as unrestricted cash. The Partnership’s restricted and unrestricted cash includes cash denominated in foreign currencies of $(361,446)$36,605 (cost of $36,626) and ($142,547) (proceeds of $355,564) and $(215,708) (proceeds of $220,034)$141,947) as of SeptemberJune 30, 20172019 and December 31, 2016,2018, respectively.

Income Taxes. Income taxes have not been recorded as each partner is individually liable for the taxes, if any, on its share of the Partnership’s income and expenses. The Partnership follows the guidance of ASC 740,“Income Taxes,” which prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for financial statement recognition and measurement of tax positions taken or expected to be taken in the course of preparing the Partnership’s tax returns to determine whether the tax positions are “more-likely-than-not”“more-likely-than-not” of being sustained “when challenged” or “when examined” by the applicable tax authority. Tax positions determined not to meet themore-likely-than-not threshold would be recorded as a tax benefit or liability in the Partnership’s Statements of Financial Condition for the current year. If a tax position does not meet the minimum statutory threshold to avoid the incurring of penalties, an expense for the amount of the statutory penalty and interest, if applicable, shall be recognized in the Statements of Income and Expenses in the period in which the position is claimed or expected to be claimed. The General Partner has concluded that there are no significant uncertain tax positions that would require recognition in the financial statements. The Partnership files U.S. federal and various state and local tax returns. No income tax returns are currently under examination. The 20132015 through 20162018 tax years remain subject to examination by U.S. federal and most state tax authorities.

Investment Company Status.Effective January 1, 2014, the Partnership adopted Accounting Standards Update2013-08,Financial Services — Investment Companies (Topic 946): Amendments to the Scope, Measurement and Disclosure RequirementsRequirements” and based on the General Partner’s assessment, the Partnership has been deemed to be an investment company since inception. Accordingly, the Partnership follows the investment company accounting and reporting guidance of Topic 946 and reflects its investments at fair value with unrealized gains and losses resulting from changes in fair value reflected in the Statements of Income and Expenses.

Net Income (loss)(Loss) per Redeemable Unit. Net income (loss) per Redeemable Unit for each Class is calculated in accordance with ASC 946,“Financial Services – Investment Companies.” See Note 3, “Financial Highlights.”

There have been no material changes with respect to the Partnership’s critical accounting policies as reported in the Partnership’s Annual Report on Form10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016.

2018.

 

68


Ceres Tactical Commodity L.P.

Notes to Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

The Master’s Statements of Financial Condition and Condensed Schedules of Investments as of September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 and Statements of Income and Expenses and Changes in Partners’ Capital for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 are presented below.

MB Master Fund L.P.

Statements of Financial Condition

                                                
   September 30,  December 31,
   2017  2016
   (Unaudited)  

 

Assets:

    

Equity in trading account:

    

Investment in U.S. Treasury bills, at fair value (amortized cost $0 and $24,980,354 at September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively)

    $-         $24,989,906 

Unrestricted cash

   89,266,802    96,314,966 

Restricted cash

   8,033,595    3,225,180 

Net unrealized appreciation on open futures contracts

   1,174,494    540,016 

Options purchased, at fair value (cost $2,352,288 and $4,100,580 at September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively)

   1,705,695    4,278,469 
  

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total equity in trading account

   100,180,586    129,348,537 

Cash at bank

   631    217 

Expense reimbursement

   11,450    11,682 
  

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total assets

    $100,192,667     $129,360,436 
  

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

Liabilities and Partners’ Capital:

    

Liabilities:

    

Options written, at fair value (premiums received $1,606,776 and $1,111,935 at September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively)

    $1,474,501     $736,137 

Accrued expenses:

    

Professional fees

   38,635    31,494 

Redemptions payable

   -        8,747,265 
  

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total liabilities

   1,513,136    9,514,896 
  

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

Partners’ Capital:

    

General Partner

   -        -     

Limited Partners

   98,679,531    119,845,540 
  

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total partners’ capital (net asset value)

   98,679,531    119,845,540 
  

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total liabilities and partners’ capital

    $100,192,667     $129,360,436 
  

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

7


Ceres Tactical Commodity L.P.

Notes to Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

MB Master Fund L.P.

Condensed Schedule of Investments

September 30, 2017

(Unaudited)

       Number of    
Contracts
  Fair Value   % of Partners’  
Capital
  

Futures Contracts Purchased

      

Energy

   1,854     $571,750   0.58  %

Grains

   3,347    (2,460,433  (2.49 

Livestock

   466    560,805   0.57  

Softs

   1,294    87,404   0.08  
    

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total futures contracts purchased

     (1,240,474  (1.26 
    

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Futures Contracts Sold

      

Energy

   137    (48,899  (0.05 

Grains

   3,017                2,234,140   2.26  

Livestock

   401    (92,698  (0.09 

Softs

   1,244    322,425   0.33  
    

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total futures contracts sold

     2,414,968               2.45  
    

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net unrealized appreciation on open futures contracts

      $1,174,494   1.19  %
    

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Options Purchased

      

Calls

      

Energy

   1,098     $443,586   0.45  %

Grains

   101    46,488   0.05  

Livestock

   205    340,865   0.35  

Softs

   285    74,898   0.08  

Puts

      

Energy

   75    173,100   0.18  

Livestock

   219    245,260   0.25  

Softs

   506    381,498   0.37  
    

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total options purchased (cost $2,352,288)

      $1,705,695   1.73  %
    

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Options Written

      

Calls

      

Energy

   75     $(105,225  (0.11 %

Grains

   55    (9,281  (0.01 

Livestock

   187    (515,230  (0.52 

Softs

   273    (50,588  (0.05 

Puts

      

Energy

   206    (606,550  (0.61 

Livestock

   165    (170,370  (0.17 

Softs

   13    (17,257  (0.02 
    

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total options written (premiums received $1,606,776)

      $(1,474,501  (1.49 %
    

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

8


Ceres Tactical Commodity L.P.

Notes to Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

MB Master Fund L.P.

Condensed Schedule of Investments

December 31, 2016

       Number     
of Contracts
  Fair Value     % of Partners’    
Capital
  

Futures Contracts Purchased

      

Energy

   1,050     $913,118   0.77  %

Grains

   2,584    (603,782  (0.50 

Livestock

   64    (9,035  (0.01 

Softs

   1,027    101,453   0.08  
    

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total futures contracts purchased

     401,754   0.34  
    

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Futures Contracts Sold

      

Energy

   754    (1,034,957  (0.87 

Grains

   2,022    1,104,320   0.92  

Softs

   483    68,899   0.06  
    

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total futures contracts sold

     138,262   0.11  
    

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net unrealized appreciation on open futures contracts

      $        540,016   0.45  %
    

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Options Purchased

      

Calls

      

Energy

   1,938     $472,920   0.39  %

Grains

   1,565    679,313   0.57  

Livestock

   824    879,120   0.73  

Softs

   1,888    1,688,119   1.41  

Puts

      

Grains

   468    228,150   0.19  

Livestock

   475    115,880   0.10  

Softs

   210    214,967   0.18  
    

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total options purchased (cost $4,100,580)

      $4,278,469   3.57  %
    

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Options Written

      

Calls

      

Grains

   197     $(41,863  (0.03 %

Softs

   1,274    (314,686  (0.26 

Puts

      

Grains

   468    (359,775  (0.30 

Softs

   164    (19,813  (0.02 
    

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total options written (premiums received $1,111,935)

      $(736,137  (0.61 %
    

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

U.S. Government Securities   

Description

      Fair Value        % of Partners’  
Capital
   

Face Amount

  Maturity Date        

  $ 25,000,000

   2/2/2017       

U.S. Treasury bills, 0.41%*

(Amortized cost of $24,980,354)                                         

  $    24,989,906    20.85    % 
      

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

  

* Liquid non-cash held as collateral.

9


Ceres Tactical Commodity L.P.

Notes to Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

MB Master Fund L.P.

Statements of Income and Expenses and Changes in Partners’ Capital

(Unaudited)

                                                                                                
   Three Months Ended
September 30,
 Nine Months Ended
September 30,
   2017 2016 2017 2016

Investment Income:

     

Interest income

    $232,212    $75,048    $577,332    $192,354 
  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Expenses:

     

Clearing fees

   456,482   642,205   1,235,331   2,147,688 

Professional fees

   15,944   20,104   47,836   61,147 
  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total expenses

   472,426   662,309   1,283,167   2,208,835 

Expense reimbursements

   (38,077  (48,322  (96,030  (161,741
  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net expenses

   434,349   613,987   1,187,137   2,047,094 
  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net investment loss

   (202,137  (538,939  (609,805  (1,854,740
  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Trading Results:

     

Net gains (losses) on trading of commodity interests:

     

Net realized gains (losses) on closed contracts

   2,934,673   (1,258,952  1,846,594   20,271,967 

Net change in unrealized gains (losses) on open contracts

   726,558   (6,045,662  (443,735  (2,501,896
  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total trading results

   3,661,231   (7,304,614  1,402,859   17,770,071 
  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income (loss)

   3,459,094   (7,843,553  793,054   15,915,331 

Subscriptions—Limited Partners

   -       284,667   9,728,900   5,884,667 

Redemptions—Limited Partners

   (8,364,202  (6,465,987  (31,120,725  (45,756,158

Distribution of interest income to feeder funds

   (232,212  (11,988  (567,238  (32,410
  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net increase (decrease) in Partners’ Capital

   (5,137,320  (14,036,861  (21,166,009  (23,988,570

Partners’ Capital, beginning of period

   103,816,851   149,420,937   119,845,540   159,372,646 
  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Partners’ Capital, end of period

    $98,679,531    $135,384,076    $98,679,531    $135,384,076 
  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

10


Ceres Tactical Commodity L.P.

Notes to Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

 

3.

Financial Highlights:

Financial highlights for the limited partner classClasses as a whole for the three and ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20172019 and 20162018 were as follows:follows. There were no Class D limited partner Redeemable Units held prior to July 1, 2018. There were no Class Z limited partner Redeemable Units held prior to February 1, 2019.

 

Class A

  Three Months Ended
September 30,
   Nine Months Ended
September 30,
 
  2017   2016   2017    2016   Three Months Ended
June 30, 2019
 Three Months Ended
June 30, 2018
 Six Months Ended
June 30, 2019
 Six Months Ended
June 30, 2018
 

Per Redeemable Unit Performance (for a unit outstanding throughout the period): *

            
  Class A Class D Class Z Class A Class A Class D Class Z** Class A 

Per Redeemable Unit Performance (for a unit outstanding throughout the period):*

         

Net realized and unrealized gains (losses)

  $46.20    $(72.43   $18.57    $165.24      $(0.84)     $(0.72)     $(0.31)     $38.96      $55.07      $42.76      $46.35      $69.24   

Net investment loss

   (18.30    (21.80    (53.71    (64.73    (12.35)   (6.30)   (4.78)   (22.74)  (29.62)  (16.47)  (10.26)  (39.85) 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Increase (decrease) for the period

   27.90     (94.23    (35.14    100.51     (13.19)   (7.02)   (5.09)   16.22    25.45    26.29    36.09    29.39   

Net asset value per Redeemable Unit, beginning of period

   1,272.66     1,463.12     1,335.70     1,268.38     1,339.30    1,044.06    1,049.22    1,278.81    1,300.66    1,010.75    1,008.04    1,265.64   
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Net asset value per Redeemable Unit, end of period

    $    1,300.56      $    1,368.89      $    1,300.56      $    1,368.89      $    1,326.11     $    1,037.04      $    1,044.13      $1,295.03      $    1,326.11      $    1,037.04      $    1,044.13      $1,295.03   
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 
  Three Months Ended
September 30,
   Nine Months Ended
September 30,
   Three Months Ended
June 30, 2019
 Three Months Ended
June 30, 2018
 Six Months Ended
June 30, 2019
 Six Months Ended
June 30, 2018
 
  2017   2016   2017    2016   Class A Class D Class Z Class A Class A Class D Class Z** Class A 

Ratios to Average Limited Partners’ Capital: **

            

Net investment loss ***

   (5.6 %   (6.3 %   (5.6 %    (6.6 %

Ratios to Average Limited Partners’ Capital:***

         

Net investment loss****

   (4.0) %  (2.7) %  (1.9) %  (5.6) %  (4.3) %  (3.0) %  (2.0) %  (5.7) % 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Operating expenses

   6.6  %   6.5  %   6.3  %    6.8  %   6.2  %  4.9  %  4.1  %  6.7  %  6.2  %  4.9  %  4.1  %  6.6  % 

Incentive fees

   -      %   -      %   -      %    -      %   (0.1) %  (0.1) %  (0.1) %  0.5  %  0.3  %  0.3  %  0.1  %  0.6  % 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total expenses

   6.6  %   6.5  %   6.3  %    6.8  %   6.1  %  4.8  %  4.0  %  7.2  %  6.5  %  5.2  %  4.2  %  7.2  % 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total return:

                     

Total return before incentive fees

   2.2  %   (6.4 %   (2.6 %    7.9  %   (1.1) %  (0.8) %  (0.6) %  1.8  %  2.2  %  2.9  %  3.7  %  2.9  % 

Incentive fees

   -      %   -      %   -      %    -      %   0.1  %  0.1  %  0.1  %  (0.5) %  (0.2) %  (0.3) %  (0.1) %  (0.6) % 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total return after incentive fees

   2.2  %   (6.4 %   (2.6 %    7.9  %   (1.0) %  (0.7) %  (0.5) %  1.3  %  2.0  %  2.6  %  3.6  %  2.3  % 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

 

*

Net investment loss per Redeemable Unit is calculated by dividing the interest income less total expenses by the average number of Redeemable Units outstanding during the period. The net realized and unrealized gains (losses) per Redeemable Unit is a balancing amount necessary to reconcile the change in net asset value per Redeemable Unit with the other per unit information.

 

**

Annualized (except for incentive fees, if applicable).For the period from February 1, 2019 to June 30, 2019.

 

***

Annualized (except for incentive fees).

****

Interest income allocated from the Master less total expenses.

The above ratios and total return may vary for individual investors based on the timing of capital transactions during the period. Additionally, these ratios are calculated for the limited partner classClasses using the limited partners’ share of income, expenses and average partners’ capital of the Partnership and include the income and expenses allocated from the Master.

11


Ceres Tactical Commodity L.P.

Notes to Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

Financial Highlights of the Master:

Financial highlights for the limited partner class as a whole for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 were as follows:

     Three Months Ended
September 30,
 Nine Months Ended
September 30,
     2017 2016 2017 2016

Ratios to Average Limited Partners’ Capital:*

       

Net investment loss **

     (0.8)%   (1.5)%   (0.7)%   (1.7)% 
    

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Operating expenses before expense reimbursements

     1.8 %   1.9 %   1.5 %   2.0 % 

Expense reimbursements

     (0.1)%   (0.1)%   (0.1)%   (0.1)% 
    

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Operating expenses after expense reimbursements

     1.7 %               1.8 %   1.4 %   1.9 % 
    

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total return

                 3.4 %   (5.3)%               0.9 %               11.8 % 
    

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

*

Annualized.

**

Interest income less total expenses, net of expense reimbursements.

The above ratios and total return may vary for individual investors based on the timing of capital transactions during the period. Additionally, these ratios are calculated for the limited partner class using the limited partners’ share of income, expenses and average partners’ capital.Funds.

 

4.

Trading Activities:

The Partnership was formed for the purpose of trading contracts in a variety of commodity interests, including derivative financial instruments and derivative commodity instruments.interests. The results of the Partnership’s trading activities are shown in the Statements of Income and Expenses. The Partnership also invests substantially allcertain of its assets through a “master-feeder”“master/feeder” structure. The Partnership’spro-rata share of the results of the Master’sFunds’ trading activities is shown in the Partnership’s Statements of Income and Expenses.

9


Ceres Tactical Commodity L.P.

Notes to Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

The futures brokerage account agreements with MS&Co. give the Partnership and the MasterFunds, respectively, the legal right to net unrealized gains and losses on open futures and forward contracts.contracts in their respective Statements of Financial Condition. The Master nets,Partnership and the Funds net, for financial reporting purposes, the unrealized gains and losses on open futures and open forward contracts in thetheir respective Statements of Financial Condition, as the criteria under ASC 210-20,“Balance Sheet,”have been met.

All of the commodity interests owned directly by the Partnership are held for trading purposes. All of the commodity interests owned by the Funds are held for trading purposes. The monthly average number of futures contracts traded directly by the Partnership during the three months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018 were 25,169 and 4,285, respectively. The monthly average number of futures contracts traded directly by the Partnership during the six months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018 were 25,852 and 4,258, respectively. The monthly average number of metals forward contracts traded directly by the Partnership during the three months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018 were 1,345 and 1,272, respectively. The monthly average number of metals forward contracts traded directly by the Partnership during the six months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018 were 1,427 and 818, respectively. The monthly average number of option contracts traded directly by the Partnership during the three months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018 were 1,857 and 1,441, respectively. The monthly average number of option contracts traded directly by the Partnership during the six months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018 were 1,948 and 1,103, respectively.

Trading and transaction fees are based on the number of trades executed by the Advisor for the MasterAdvisors and the Partnership’s respective percentage ownership of the Master. each Fund.

All clearing fees paid to MS&Co. are borne directly by the MasterPartnership for its direct trading. In addition, clearing fees are borne by the Funds for indirect trading and allocated to the Master’sFunds’ limited partners,partners/members, including the Partnership.

All of the commodity interests owned by the Master are held for trading purposes. The monthly average number of futures contracts traded by the Master during the three months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 were 10,480 and 10,594, respectively. The monthly average number of futures contracts traded by the Master during the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 were 7,260 and 9,531, respectively. The monthly average number of option contracts traded by the Master during the three months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 were 3,982 and 17,568, respectively. The monthly average number of option contracts traded by the Master during the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 were 5,846 and 18,491, respectively. There were no metal forward contracts traded by the Master during the three months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016. The monthly average number of metals forward contracts traded by the Master during the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 were 69 and 0, respectively.

12


Ceres Tactical Commodity L.P.

Notes to Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

The following tables summarize the gross and net amounts recognized relating to assets and liabilities of the Master’sPartnership’s derivatives and their offsetting subject to master netting agreementsarrangements or similar arrangementsagreements as of SeptemberJune 30, 20172019 and December 31, 2016,2018, respectively.

 

                                                                                                                                                
  Gross Amounts
Recognized
 Gross Amounts
Offset in the

Statements of
Financial
Condition
 Net Amounts
Presented in the

Statements of
Financial
Condition
  Gross Amounts Not Offset in the
Statements of Financial Condition
  Net
Amount
     Gross
Amounts
Recognized
  Gross Amounts
Offset in the

Statements of
Financial
Condition
  Amounts
Presented in the
Statements of
Financial
Condition
  Gross Amounts Not Offset in the
    Statements of Financial Condition    
        

September 30, 2017

     Financial
Instruments
  Cash Collateral
Received/ Pledged*
  

June 30, 2019

    Gross
Amounts
Recognized
  Gross Amounts
Offset in the

Statements of
Financial
Condition
  Amounts
Presented in the
Statements of
Financial
Condition
  Financial
Instruments
    Cash Collateral
Received/
Pledged*
    Net Amount   

Assets

                      

Futures

    $4,874,050  $(3,699,556   $1,174,494     $-         $-         $1,174,494          $        7,083,055     $(7,083,055    $-         $-           $-           $-         

Forwards

     1,224,388    (1,099,261   125,127    -          -                      125,127     
  

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

     

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

    

 

    

 

  

Total assets

    $4,874,050  $(3,699,556   $1,174,494     $-         $-         $1,174,494          $8,307,443     $    (8,182,316)     $125,127     $    -           $-           $125,127     
  

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

     

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

    

 

    

 

  

Liabilities

                              

Futures

    $(3,699,556 $3,699,556    $-         $-         $-         $-              $(8,019,885    $7,083,055     $    (936,830)     $-           $    936,830       $-         

Forwards

     (1,099,261   1,099,261    -        -          -          -         
  

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

     

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

    

 

    

 

  

Total liabilities

    $(3,699,556 $3,699,556    $-         $-         $-         $-              $(9,119,146    $8,182,316     $(936,830    $-           $936,830       $-         
  

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

     

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

    

 

    

 

  

Net fair value

            $1,174,494     *                     $125,127      * 
          

 

                   

 

  
  Gross Amounts
Recognized
 Gross Amounts
Offset in the

Statements of
Financial
Condition
 Net Amounts
Presented in the
Statements of
Financial
Condition
  Gross Amounts Not Offset in the
Statements of Financial Condition
  Net
Amount
 

December 31, 2016

     Financial
Instruments
  Cash Collateral
Received/ Pledged*
  

Assets

          

Futures

    $3,722,941    $(3,182,925   $540,016     $-         $-       $540,016    
  

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total assets

    $3,722,941    $(3,182,925   $540,016     $-         $-       $540,016    
  

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Liabilities

          

Futures

    $(3,182,925   $3,182,925    $-         $-         $-       $-        
  

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total liabilities

    $(3,182,925   $3,182,925    $-         $-         $-       $-        
  

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Net fair value

          $540,016     * 
          

 

 

10


Ceres Tactical Commodity L.P.

Notes to Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

     Gross
Amounts
    Recognized    
    Gross Amounts
Offset in the

Statements of
Financial
Condition
    Amounts
Presented in the

Statements of
Financial
Condition
    Gross Amounts Not Offset in the
    Statements of Financial Condition    
    Net Amount  

December 31, 2018

    Financial
Instruments
    Cash Collateral
Received/
Pledged*

Assets

                         

Futures

      $6,579,887         $(4,822,376)        $1,757,511         $-           $-            $1,757,511   

Forwards

     2,203,511        (2,203,511)       -            -          -           -       
    

 

 

 

    

 

 

 

    

 

 

 

    

 

 

 

    

 

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

Total assets

      $        8,783,398         $    (7,025,887)        $    1,757,511         $    -           $-            $    1,757,511   
    

 

 

 

    

 

 

 

    

 

 

 

    

 

 

 

    

 

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

Liabilities

                         

Futures

      $(4,822,376)        $4,822,376         $-             $-           $-            $-       

Forwards

     (2,567,628)       2,203,511        (364,117)       -              364,117       -       
    

 

 

 

    

 

 

 

    

 

 

 

    

 

 

 

    

 

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

Total liabilities

      $(7,390,004)        $7,025,887         $(364,117)        $        -           $364,117        $-       
    

 

 

 

    

 

 

 

    

 

 

 

    

 

 

 

    

 

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

Net fair value

                          $1,757,511   * 
                        

 

 

 

 

 

*

In the event of default by the Master,Partnership, MS&Co., the Master’sPartnership’s commodity futures broker and the sole counterparty to the Master’s off-exchange-tradedPartnership’snon-exchange-traded contracts, as applicable, has the right to offset the Master’sPartnership’s obligation with the Master’sPartnership’s cash and/or U.S. Treasury bills held by MS&Co., thereby minimizing MS&Co.’s risk of loss. In certain instances, MS&Co. may not post collateral and as such, in the event of default by MS&Co., the MasterPartnership is exposed to the amount shown in the Master’s Statements of Financial Condition. In the case of exchange-traded contracts, the Master’sPartnership’s exposure to counterparty risk may be reduced since the exchange’s clearinghouse interposes its credit between buyer and seller and the clearinghouse’s guarantee funds may be available in the event of a default.

 

1311


Ceres Tactical Commodity L.P.

Notes to Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

 

The following tables indicate the Master’s gross fair values of derivative instruments of futures, forward and option contracts held directly by the Partnership as separate assets and liabilities as of SeptemberJune 30, 20172019 and December 31, 2016,2018, respectively.

 

     SeptemberJune 30,
20172019
  

Assets

   

Futures Contracts

   

Energy

    $818,9725,787,927   

Grains

   2,857,234322,339   

Livestock

   625,041375,020 

Metals

251,372   

Softs

   572,803346,397   
  

 

 

 

 

Total unrealized appreciation on open futures contracts

   4,874,0507,083,055   
  

 

 

 

 

Liabilities

   

Futures Contracts

   

Energy

   (296,121(6,333,744))  

Grains

   (3,083,527(325,737))  

Livestock

   (156,934(361,486))

Metals

(780,891)  

Softs

   (162,974(218,027))  
  

 

 

 

 

Total unrealized depreciation on open futures contracts

   (3,699,556(8,019,885))

Net unrealized depreciation on open futures contracts

  $(936,830)*

Assets

Forward Contracts

Metals

  $1,224,388 

Total unrealized appreciation on open forward contracts

1,224,388 

Liabilities

Forward Contracts

Metals

(1,099,261)

Total unrealized depreciation on open forward contracts

(1,099,261)  
  

 

 

 

 

Net unrealized appreciation on open futuresforward contracts

    $            1,174,494125,127   **
  

 

 

 

 

Assets

   

Options Purchased

   

Energy

    $616,686298,011   

GrainsMetals

   46,488

Livestock

586,125728,796   

Softs

   456,39654,241   
  

 

 

 

 

Total options purchased

    $1,705,6951,081,048   ***
  

 

 

 

 

Liabilities

   

Options Written

   

Energy

    $(711,775(16,047))  

Grains

   (9,281(26,250))  

Livestock

   (685,600(52,850))

Metals

(790,086)  

Softs

   (67,845(162,039))  
  

 

 

 

 

Total options written

    $(1,474,501    (1,047,272) ****

*

This amount is in “Net unrealized depreciation on open futures contracts” in the Statements of Financial Condition.

**

This amount is in “Net unrealized appreciation on open forward contracts” in the Statements of Financial Condition.

***

This amount is in “Options purchased, at fair value” in the Statements of Financial Condition.

****

This amount is in “Options written, at fair value” in the Statements of Financial Condition.

12


Ceres Tactical Commodity L.P.

Notes to Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

December 31,
2018

Assets

Futures Contracts

Currencies

  $14,578

Energy

5,628,038

Grains

157,540

Livestock

317,100

Metals

125,934

Softs

336,697

Total unrealized appreciation on open futures contracts

6,579,887

Liabilities

Futures Contracts

Currencies

(1,159)

Energy

(3,938,643)

Grains

(66,943)

Livestock

(252,835)

Metals

(295,124)

Softs

(267,672)

Total unrealized depreciation on open futures contracts

    (4,822,376)

Net unrealized appreciation on open futures contracts

  $1,757,511*

Assets

Forward Contracts

Metals

  $2,203,511

Total unrealized appreciation on open forward contracts

2,203,511

Liabilities

Forward Contracts

Metals

(2,567,628)

Total unrealized depreciation on open forward contracts

(2,567,628)

Net unrealized depreciation on open forward contracts

  $(364,117)**

Assets

Options Purchased

Energy

  $35,640

Grains

27,500

Livestock

19,620

Metals

222,454

Total options purchased

  $305,214***

Liabilities

Options Written

Energy

  $(34,760)

Livestock

(17,820)

Metals

(239,069)

Softs

(117,922)

Total options written

  $(409,571)****
  

 

 

 

 

 

*

This amount is in “Net unrealized appreciation on open futures contracts” in the Master’s Statements of Financial Condition.

**

This amount is in “Options purchased, at fair value”“Net unrealized depreciation on open forward contracts” in the Master’s Statements of Financial Condition.

***

This amount is in “Options written,purchased, at fair value” in the Master’s Statements of Financial Condition.

14


Ceres Tactical Commodity L.P.

Notes to Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

  December 31,  
2016

Assets

Futures Contracts

Energy

  $1,097,955

Grains

1,630,894

Softs

994,092

Total unrealized appreciation on open futures contracts

3,722,941

Liabilities

Futures Contracts

Energy

(1,219,794

Grains

(1,130,356

Livestock

(9,035

Softs

(823,740

Total unrealized depreciation on open futures contracts

(3,182,925

Net unrealized appreciation on open futures contracts

  $540,016*

Assets

Options Purchased

Energy

  $472,920

Grains

907,463

Livestock

995,000

Softs

1,903,086

Total options purchased

  $            4,278,469*

Liabilities

Options Written

Grains

  $(401,638

Softs

(334,499

Total options written

  $(736,137*** 

*

This amount is in “Net unrealized appreciation on open futures contracts” in the Master’s Statements of Financial Condition.

**

This amount is in “Options purchased, at fair value” in the Master’s Statements of Financial Condition.

***

This amount is in “Options written, at fair value” in the Master’s Statements of Financial Condition.

 

1513


Ceres Tactical Commodity L.P.

Notes to Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

 

The following table indicates the Master’s total trading gains and losses, by market sector, on derivative instruments traded directly by the Partnership for the three and ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20172019 and 2016.2018.

 

  Three Months Ended    Nine Months Ended                                                                                      
  September 30,    September 30,    Three Months Ended June 30, Six Months Ended June 30, 

Sector

  2017    2016    2017    2016    2019 2018 2019 2018 

Currencies

    $(10,189     $7,297      $(19,694     $(8,509     $1,104      $(314,000)     $84,411      $(286,471)  

Energy

   (466,552    (3,887,113    (4,123,641    14,132,306     174,423     2,261,423     2,282,326     2,856,161   

Grains

   (553,369    (3,616,262    1,608,897     305,452     94,277     (600,462)    267,084     (443,885)  

Interest RatesNon-U.S.

   -         -         -         17,430   

Livestock

   2,290,668     (672,913    1,718,970     (763,312    (25,997)    141,540     1,393,645     324,559   

Metals

   254,035     (102,766              451,310     (137,931    (29,008)    412,631     835,552     402,254   

Softs

             2,146,638               967,143     1,767,017               4,242,065     717,443     621,826     587,221     260,565   
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total

    $3,661,231  *     $(7,304,614 *     $1,402,859  *     $17,770,071  *     $        932,242   *****    $        2,522,958   *****    $        5,450,239   *****    $        3,130,613   ***** 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

 

*****

This amount is included in “Total trading results” in the Master’s Statements of Income and Expenses and Changes in Partners’ Capital.Expenses.

 

5.

Fair Value Measurements:

Master’sPartnership’s and the Funds’ Fair Value Measurements.Fair value is defined as the value that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date under current market conditions. The fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1) and the lowest priority to fair values derived from unobservable inputs (Level 3). The level in the fair value hierarchy within which the fair value measurement in its entirety falls shall be determined based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety.

The fair value of exchange-traded futures, option and forward contracts is determined by the various exchanges, and reflects the settlement price for each contract as of the close of business on the last business day of the reporting period. The fair value of foreign currency forward contracts is extrapolated on a forward basis from the spot prices quoted as of approximately 3:00 P.M. (E.T.) on the last business day of the reporting period from various exchanges. The fair value ofnon-exchange-traded foreign currency option contracts is calculated by applying an industry standard model application for options valuation of foreign currency options, using as input the spot prices, interest rates, and option implied volatilities quoted as of approximately 3:00 P.M. (E.T.) on the last business day of the reporting period. U.S. Treasury bills are valued at the last available bid price received from independent pricing services as of the close of the last business day of the reporting period.

The Master considersPartnership and the Funds consider prices for exchange-traded commodity futures, forward, swap and option contracts to be based on unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets and liabilities (Level 1). The values of U.S. Treasury bills, non-exchange-traded forward, swap and certain option contracts for which market quotations are not readily available are priced by pricing services that derive fair values for those assets and liabilities from observable inputs (Level 2). As of SeptemberJune 30, 20172019 and December 31, 20162018 and for the periods ended SeptemberJune 30, 20172019 and 2016,2018, the MasterPartnership and the Funds did not hold any derivative instruments that were priced at fair value using unobservable inputs through the application of the General Partner’s assumptions and internal valuation pricing models (Level 3). Transfers between levels are recognized at the end of the reporting period. During the reporting periods, there were no transfers of assets or liabilities between Level 1 and Level 2.

 

1614


Ceres Tactical Commodity L.P.

Notes to Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

 

                                                                                                                                                                                    

September 30, 2017

  Total  Level 1  Level 2  Level 3
June 30, 2019          Total                  Level 1                  Level 2                Level 3        

Assets

                

Futures

    $4,874,050   $4,874,050     $-         $-         $7,083,055       $7,083,055       $-           $-     

Forwards

   1,224,388      -        1,224,388      -     

Options purchased

   1,705,695    1,705,695    -        -        1,081,048      1,081,048      -          -     
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

Total assets

    $6,579,745   $6,579,745     $-         $-         $        9,388,491       $        8,164,103       $        1,224,388       $-     
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

Liabilities

                

Futures

    $3,699,556   $3,699,556     $-         $-         $8,019,885       $8,019,885       $-           $-     

Forwards

   1,099,261      -          1,099,261      -     

Options written

   1,474,501    1,474,501    -        -        1,047,272      1,047,272      -          -     
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

Total liabilities

    $5,174,057   $5,174,057     $-         $-         $10,166,418       $9,067,157       $1,099,261       $-     
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

December 31, 2016

  Total  Level 1  Level 2  Level 3
December 31, 2018  Total  Level 1  Level 2  Level 3

Assets

                

U.S. Treasury bills

    $        24,989,906   $-         $24,989,906     $-     

Futures

   3,722,941    3,722,941    -        -         $6,579,887       $6,579,887       $-           $-     

Forwards

   2,203,511      -          2,203,511      -     

Options purchased

   4,278,469            4,278,469    -        -        305,214      305,214      -          -     
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

Total assets

    $32,991,316   $8,001,410     $            24,989,906     $-         $9,088,612       $6,885,101       $2,203,511       $-     
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

Liabilities

                

Futures

    $3,182,925   $3,182,925     $-         $-         $4,822,376       $4,822,376       $-           $-     

Forwards

   2,567,628      -          2,567,628      -     

Options written

   736,137    736,137    -                                -        409,571      409,571      -          -     
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

Total liabilities

    $3,919,062   $3,919,062     $-         $-         $7,799,575       $5,231,947       $2,567,628       $-     
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

6.

Investment in the Funds:

On April 1, 2019, the Partnership allocated a portion of its assets to NL Master, a limited liability company organized under the limited liability company laws of the State of Delaware. NL Master permits accounts managed by Northlander using Northlander’s Commodity Program, a proprietary, discretionary trading system, to invest together in one trading vehicle. The General Partner is also the trading manager of NL Master. Individual and pooled accounts currently managed by Northlander, including the Partnership, are permitted to be members of NL Master. The Trading Manager and Northlander believe that trading through this master/feeder structure should promote efficiency and economy in the trading process.

On December 1, 2018, the Partnership allocated a portion of its assets to Aquantum, which were managed and traded directly by Aquantum pursuant to Aquantum’s Commodity Spread Program through a trading account in the Partnership’s name from December 1, 2018 until May 31, 2019. Effective June 1, 2019, the assets allocated to Aquantum were transferred into Aquantum Master, a limited liability company organized under the limited liability company laws of the State of Delaware, through which they are managed and traded by Aquantum pursuant to the same strategy. Aquantum Master permits accounts managed by Aquantum using Aquantum’s Commodity Spread Program, a proprietary, systematic trading system, to invest together in one trading vehicle. The General Partner is also the trading manager of Aquantum Master. Individual and pooled accounts currently managed by Aquantum, including the Partnership, are permitted to be members of Aquantum Master. The Trading Manager and Aquantum believe that trading through this master/feeder structure should promote efficiency and economy in the trading process.

On February 1, 2013, the Partnership allocated substantially all of its capital to MB Master, a limited partnership organized under the partnership laws of the State of Delaware. Effective November 30, 2018, the Partnership fully redeemed its investment in MB Master.

15


Ceres Tactical Commodity L.P.

Notes to Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

On January 1, 2018, the Partnership allocated a portion of its assets to Harbour Square Master, a limited liability company organized under the limited liability company laws of the State of Delaware. Harbour Square Master permitted accounts managed by Harbour Square using Harbour Square’s Discretionary Energy Program, a proprietary, discretionary trading system, to invest together in one trading vehicle. Effective March 31, 2019, the Partnership fully redeemed its investment in Harbour Square Master.

The General Partner is not aware of any material changes to the trading programs discussed above or in Note 1, “Organization” during the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2019.

The Partnership’s/Funds’ trading of futures, forward, swap and option contracts, if applicable, on commodities is done primarily on U.S. commodity exchanges and foreign commodity exchanges. The Partnership/Funds engage in such trading through commodity brokerage accounts maintained with MS&Co.

Generally, a limited partner/member in the Funds may withdraw all or part of its capital contribution and undistributed profits, if any, from the Funds as of the end of any month (the “Redemption Date”) after a request has been made to the General Partner/Trading Manager at least three days in advance of the Redemption Date. Such withdrawals are classified as a liability when the limited partner/member elects to redeem and informs the Funds. However, a limited partner/member may request a withdrawal as of the end of any day if such request is received by the General Partner/Trading Manager at least three days in advance of the proposed withdrawal date.

Management fees, General Partner fees, ongoing selling agent fees and incentive fees are charged at the Partnership level. All clearing fees paid to MS&Co. are borne directly by the Partnership for its direct trading. In addition, clearing fees are borne by the Funds and allocated to the Funds’ limited partners/members, including the Partnership. Professional fees are borne by the Funds and allocated to the Partnership, and also charged directly at the Partnership level.

At June 30, 2019, the Partnership owned approximately 25.9% of NL Master and 53.9% of Aquantum Master. At December 31, 2018, the Partnership owned approximately 68.7% of Harbour Square Master. It is the Partnership’s intention to continue to invest in the Funds. The performance of the Partnership is directly affected by the performance of the Funds. Expenses to investors as a result of the investment in the Funds are approximately the same as they would be if the Partnership traded directly and redemption rights are not affected.

Summarized information reflecting the total assets, liabilities and members’ capital of the Funds is shown in the following tables:

                                                               
   June 30, 2019
   Total Assets    Total Liabilities      Total Capital    

NL Master

    $23,676,559      $196,493      $23,480,066  

Aquantum Master

   45,267,870     3,234,291     42,033,579  
   December 31, 2018
   Total Assets  Total Liabilities  Total Capital

Harbour Square Master

    $10,504,910      $2,532,233      $7,972,677  

16


Ceres Tactical Commodity L.P.

Notes to Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

Summarized information reflecting the net investment income (loss), total trading results and net income (loss) of the Funds is shown in the following tables:

                                                               
   For the three months ended June 30, 2019
    Net Investment  
 Income (Loss)  
 Total Trading
Results
 Net Income
(Loss)

NL Master

    $47,535    $(1,353,287   $(1,305,752

Aquantum Master(a)

   (55,069  (1,108,871  (1,163,940
   For the six months ended June 30, 2019
    Net Investment  
 Income (Loss)  
 Total Trading
Results
 Net Income
(Loss)

Harbour Square Master(b)

    $(14,678   $160,848    $146,170 

NL Master(c)

   47,535   (1,353,287  (1,305,752

Aquantum Master(a)

   (55,069  (1,108,871  (1,163,940
   For the three months ended June 30, 2018
    Net Investment  
 Income (Loss)  
 Total Trading
Results
 Net Income
(Loss)

MB Master

    $(6,603   $(976,916   $(983,519

Harbour Square Master

   76,151   9,930   86,081 
   For the six months ended June 30, 2018
    Net Investment  
 Income (Loss)  
 Total Trading
Results
 Net Income
(Loss)

MB Master

    $(1,070   $45,396    $44,326 

Harbour Square Master

   141,423   876,061   1,017,484 

(a)

From June 1, 2019, commencement of operations for Aquantum Master, through June 30, 2019.

(b)

From January 1, 2019 through March 31, 2019, the date the Partnership fully redeemed its investment in Harbour Square Master.

(c)

From April 1, 2019, commencement of operations for NL Master, through June 30, 2019.

17


Ceres Tactical Commodity L.P.

Notes to Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

Summarized information reflecting the Partnership’s investments in and the Partnership’spro-rata share of the results of operations of the Funds is shown in the following tables:

                                                                                                                                                                        
   June 30, 2019  For the three months ended June 30, 2019      
   % of       Expenses  Net      

Funds

  Partners’
Capital
 Fair
Value
  Income
(Loss)
  Clearing
Fees
  Professional
Fees
  Income
(Loss)
  Investment
Objective
  Redemptions
Permitted

NL Master

   5.91   $6,092,681     $(323,787)     $9,986      $5,570      $(339,343)     Commodity Portfolio    Monthly 

Aquantum Master(a)

   22.01  22,694,847    (576,805)    60,184     8,838     (645,827)     Commodity Portfolio    Monthly 
   

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

    

Total

     $    28,787,528     $    (900,592)     $    70,170      $    14,408      $    (985,170)      
   

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

    
   June 30, 2019  For the six months ended June 30, 2019      
   % of       Expenses  Net      

Funds

  Partners’
Capital
 Fair
Value
  Income
(Loss)
  Clearing
Fees
  Professional
Fees
  Income
(Loss)
  Investment
Objective
  Redemptions
Permitted

Harbour Square Master(b)

      $-         $141,964      $7,656      $29,566      $104,742      Commodity Portfolio    Monthly 

NL Master(c)

   5.91  6,092,681    (323,787)    9,986     5,570     (339,343)     Commodity Portfolio    Monthly 

Aquantum Master(a)

   22.01  22,694,847    (576,805)    60,184     8,838     (645,827)     Commodity Portfolio    Monthly 
   

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

    

Total

     $28,787,528     $(758,628)     $77,826      $43,974      $(880,428)      
   

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

    
   December 31, 2018  For the three months ended June 30, 2018      
   % of       Expenses  Net      

Funds

  Partners’
Capital
 Fair
Value
  Income
(Loss)
  Clearing
Fees
  Professional
Fees
  Income
(Loss)
  Investment
Objective
  Redemptions
Permitted

MB Master(d)

      $-         $(447,089)     $64,826      $8,211      $(520,126)     Commodity Portfolio    Monthly 

Harbour Square Master

   9.43  5,489,732    51,813     12,081     10,070     29,662      Commodity Portfolio    Monthly 
   

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

    

Total

     $5,489,732     $(395,276)     $76,907      $18,281      $(490,464)      
   

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

    
   December 31, 2018  For the six months ended June 30, 2018      
   % of       Expenses  Net      

Funds

  Partners’
Capital
 Fair
Value
  Income
(Loss)
  Clearing
Fees
  Professional
Fees
  Income
(Loss)
  Investment
Objective
  Redemptions
Permitted

MB Master(d)

      $-         $76,657      $114,044      $16,609      $(53,996)     Commodity Portfolio    Monthly 

Harbour Square Master

   9.43  5,489,732    648,037     21,312     20,766     605,959      Commodity Portfolio    Monthly 
   

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

    

Total

     $5,489,732     $724,694      $135,356      $37,375      $551,963       
   

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

    

(a)

From June 1, 2019, the date the Partnership invested into Aquantum Master, through June 30, 2019.

(b)

From January 1, 2019 through March 31, 2019, the date the Partnership fully redeemed its investment in Harbour Square Master.

(c)

From April 1, 2019, the date the Partnership invested into NL Master, through June 30, 2019.

(d)

The Partnership fully redeemed its investment in MB Master as of November 30, 2018.

18


Ceres Tactical Commodity L.P.

Notes to Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

7.

Financial Instrument Risks:

In the normal course of business, the Partnership through its investment inand the Master, is partyFunds are parties to financial instruments withoff-balance-sheet risk, including derivative financial instruments and derivative commodity instruments. These financial instruments may include forwards, futures, forwards, options and swaps, whose values are based upon an underlying asset, index, or reference rate, and generally represent future commitments to exchange currencies or cash balances, to purchase or sell other financial instruments at specific terms at specified future dates, or, in the case of derivative commodity instruments, to have a reasonable possibility to be settled in cash, through physical delivery or with another financial instrument. These instruments may be traded on an exchange, a swap execution facility orover-the-counter (“OTC”). Exchange-traded instruments include futures and certain standardized forward, option and swap contracts. Certain swap contracts may also be traded on a swap execution facility or OTC. OTC contracts are negotiated between contracting parties and also include certain forward and option contracts. Specific market movements of commodities or futures contracts underlying an option cannot accurately be predicted. The purchaser of an option may lose the entire premium paid for the option. The writer or seller of an option has unlimited risk. Certain swap contracts may also be traded on a swap execution facility or OTC. OTC contracts are negotiated between contracting parties and also include certain forward and option contracts. Each of these instruments is subject to various risks similar to those related to the underlying financial instruments, including market and credit risk. In general, the risks associated with OTC contracts are greater than those associated with exchange-traded instruments because of the greater risk of default by the counterparty to an OTC contract. None of the Master’sPartnership’s/Funds’ contracts are traded OTC, although contracts may be traded OTC in the future.

17


Ceres Tactical Commodity L.P.

Notes to Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

Futures Contracts. The Master tradesPartnership and the Funds trade futures contracts. A futures contract is a firm commitment to buy or sell a specified quantity of investments, currency or a standardized amount of a deliverable grade commodity, at a specified price on a specified future date, unless the contract is closed before the delivery date or the delivery quantity is something where physical delivery cannot occur (such as the S&P 500 Index), whereby such contract is settled in cash. Payments (“variation margin”) may be made or received by the MasterPartnership and the Funds each business day, depending on the daily fluctuations in the value of the underlying contracts, and are recorded as unrealized gains or losses by the Master.Partnership and the Funds. When the contract is closed, the Master recordsPartnership and the Funds record a realized gain or loss equal to the difference between the value of the contract at the time it was opened and the value at the time it was closed. Transactions in futures contracts require participants to make both initial margin deposits of cash or other assets and variation margin deposits, through the futures broker, directly with the exchange on which the contracts are traded. Net realized gains (losses) and net change in unrealized gains (losses) on futures contracts are included in the Master’sPartnership’s/Funds’ Statements of Income and Expenses and Changes in Partners’ Capital.

Options. The Master may purchase and write (sell) both exchange-listed and OTC options on commodities or financial instruments. An option is a contract allowing, but not requiring, its holder to buy (call) or sell (put) a specific or standard commodity or financial instrument at a specified price during a specified time period. The option premium is the total price paid or received for the option contract. When the Master writes an option, the premium received is recorded as a liability in the Master’s Statements of Financial Condition and marked-to-market daily. When the Master purchases an option, the premium paid is recorded as an asset in the Master’s Statements of Financial Condition and marked-to-market daily. Net realized gains (losses) and net change in unrealized gains (losses) on option contracts are included in the Master’s Statements of Income and Expenses and Changes in Partners’ Capital.

As both a buyer and seller of options, the Master pays or receives a premium at the outset and then bears the risk of unfavorable changes in the price of the contract underlying the option. Written options expose the Master to potentially unlimited liability; for purchased options the risk of loss is limited to the premiums paid. Certain written put options permit cash settlement and do not require the option holder to own the reference asset. The Partnership/Master does not consider these contracts to be guarantees.

Futures-style options. The Master may trade futures-style option contracts. Unlike traditional option contracts, the premiums for futures-style option contracts are not received or paid upon the onset of the trade. The premiums are recognized and received or paid as part of the sales price when the contract is closed. Similar to a futures contract, variation margin for the futures-style option contract may be made or received by the Master each business day, depending on the daily fluctuations in the value of the underlying contracts, and are recorded as unrealized gains or losses by the Master. Transactions in futures-style option contracts require participants to make both initial margin deposits of cash or other assets and variation margin deposits, through the futures broker, directly with the exchange on which the contracts are traded. Futures-style option contracts are presented as part of “Net unrealized appreciation on open futures contracts” or “Net unrealized depreciation on open futures contracts,” as applicable, in the Master’s Statements of Financial Condition. Net realized gains (losses) and net change in unrealized gains (losses) on futures-style option contracts are included in the Master’s Statements of Income and Expenses and Changes in Partners’ Capital.Expenses.

London Metals Exchange Forward Contracts. Metal contracts traded on the London Metals Exchange (“LME”) represent a firm commitment to buy or sell a specified quantity of aluminum, copper, lead, nickel, tin or zinc. LME contracts traded by the MasterPartnership and the Funds are cash settled based on prompt dates published by the LME. Variation margin may be made or received by the Master onPartnership and the Funds each business day, depending on the daily fluctuations in the value of the underlying contracts, and are recorded as unrealized gains or losses by the Master.Partnership and the Funds. A contract is considered offset when all long positions have been matched with a like number of short positions settling on the same prompt date. When the contract is closed at the prompt date, the Master recordsPartnership and the Funds record a realized gain or loss equal to the difference between the value of the contract at the time it was opened and the value at the time it was closed. Transactions in LME contracts require participants to make both initial margin deposits of cash or other assets and variation margin deposits, through the broker, directly with the LME. Net realized gains (losses) and net change in unrealized gains (losses) on metal contracts are included in the Master’sPartnership’s/Funds’ Statements of Income and ExpensesExpenses.

Options. The Partnership and Changesthe Funds may purchase and write (sell) both exchange-listed and OTC options on commodities or financial instruments. An option is a contract allowing, but not requiring, its holder to buy (call) or sell (put) a specific or standard commodity or financial instrument at a specified price during a specified time period. The option premium is the total price paid or received for the option contract. When the Partnership/Funds write an option, the premium received is recorded as a liability in Partners’ Capital.the Partnership’s/Funds’ Statements of Financial Condition andmarked-to-market daily. When the Partnership/Funds purchase an option, the premium paid is recorded as an asset in the Partnership’s/Funds’ Statements of Financial Condition andmarked-to-market daily. Net realized gains (losses) and net change in unrealized gains (losses) on option contracts are included in the Partnership’s/Funds’ Statements of Income and Expenses.

As both a buyer and seller of options, the Partnership/Funds pay or receive a premium at the outset and then bear the risk of unfavorable changes in the price of the contract underlying the option. Written options expose the Partnership/Funds to potentially unlimited liability; for purchased options, the risk of loss is limited to the premiums paid. Certain written put options permit cash settlement and do not require the option holder to own the reference asset. The Partnership/Funds do not consider these contracts to be guarantees.

19


Ceres Tactical Commodity L.P.

Notes to Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

Futures-Style Options. The Partnership and the Funds may trade futures-style option contracts. Unlike traditional option contracts, the premiums for futures-style option contracts are not received or paid upon the onset of the trade. The premiums are recognized and received or paid as part of the sales price when the contract is closed. Similar to a futures contract, variation margin for the futures-style option contract may be made or received by the Partnership/Funds each business day, depending on the daily fluctuations in the value of the underlying contracts, and are recorded as unrealized gains or losses by the Partnership/Funds. Transactions in futures-style option contracts require participants to make both initial margin deposits of cash or other assets and variation margin deposits, through the futures broker, directly with the exchange on which the contracts are traded. Futures-style option contracts are presented as part of “Net unrealized appreciation on open futures contracts” or “Net unrealized depreciation on open futures contracts,” as applicable, in the Partnership’s/Funds’ Statements of Financial Condition. Net realized gains (losses) and net change in unrealized gains (losses) on futures-style option contracts are included in the Partnership’s/Funds’ Statements of Income and Expenses.

Market risk is the potential for changes in the value of the financial instruments traded by the MasterPartnership/Funds due to market changes, including interest and foreign exchange rate movements and fluctuations in commodity or security prices. Market risk is directly impacted by the volatility and liquidity in the markets in which the related underlying assets are traded. The Master isPartnership and the Funds are exposed to market risk equal to the value of the futures option and forward contracts held and unlimited liability on such contracts sold short or written.

18


Ceres Tactical Commodity L.P.

Notes to Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

short.

Credit risk is the possibility that a loss may occur due to the failure of a counterparty to perform according to the terms of a contract. The Partnership’s/Master’sFunds’ risk of loss in the event of a counterparty default is typically limited to the amounts recognized in the Statements of Financial Condition and is not represented by the contract or notional amounts of the instruments. The Partnership’s/Master’sFunds’ risk of loss is reduced through the use of legally enforceable master netting agreements with counterparties that permit the Partnership/MasterFunds to offset unrealized gains and losses and other assets and liabilities with such counterparties upon the occurrence of certain events. The Partnership/Master hasFunds have credit risk and concentration risk, as MS&Co. or an MS&Co. affiliate is the sole counterpartyare counterparties or brokerbrokers with respect to the Partnership’s/Master’sFunds’ assets. Credit risk with respect toexchange-traded instruments is reduced to the extent that, through MS&Co. or an MS&Co. affiliate, the Partnership’s/Master’sFunds’ counterparty is an exchange or clearing organization.

The General PartnerPartner/Trading Manager monitors and attempts to mitigate the Partnership’s/Master’sFunds’ risk exposure on a daily basis through financial, credit and risk management monitoring systems and, accordingly, believes that it has effective procedures for evaluating and limiting the credit and market risks to which the Partnership/MasterFunds may be subject. These monitoring systems generally allow the General PartnerPartner/Trading Manager to statistically analyze actual trading results withrisk-adjusted performance indicators and correlation statistics. In addition, online monitoring systems provide account analysis of futures, forward and option contracts by sector, margin requirements, gain and loss transactions and collateral positions.

The majority of these financial instruments mature within one year of the inception date. However, due to the nature of the Partnership’s/Funds’ business, these instruments may not be held to maturity.

The risk to the limited partners that have purchased Redeemable Units is limited to the amount of their share of the Partnership’s net assets and undistributed profits. This limited liability is a result of the organization of the Partnership as a limited partnership under New York law.

The majority of these financial instruments mature within one year of the inception date. However, due to the nature of the Partnership’s/Master’s business, these instruments may not be held to maturity.

In the ordinary course of business, the Master entersPartnership/Funds enter into contracts and agreements that contain various representations and warranties and which provide general indemnifications. The Master’sPartnership’s/Funds’ maximum exposure under these arrangements cannot be determined, as this could include future claims that have not yet been made against the Master.Partnership/Funds. The Master considersPartnership/Funds consider the risk of any future obligation relating to these indemnifications to be remote.

 

7.8.

Subsequent Events:

The General Partner evaluates events that occur after the balance sheet date but before and up until financial statements are available to be issued. The General Partner has assessed the subsequent events through the date the financial statements were issued and has determined that there were no subsequent events requiring adjustment to or disclosure in the financial statements.

 

1920


Item 2.   Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

The Partnership does not have, nor does it expect to have, any capital assets. The Partnership does not engage in sales of goods or services. The Partnership’s onlyIts assets are its (i) investment in the Master and cash. The Master does not engage in sales of goods or services. The Master’s only assets are its cash at bank, expense reimbursement andFund(s), (ii) redemptions receivable from the Fund(s), (iii) equity in trading account, consisting of unrestricted cash, restricted cash, net unrealized appreciation on open futures contracts, net unrealized appreciation on open forward contracts and options purchased at fair value, if applicable, and U.S. Treasury bills at fair value, if applicable.(iv) interest receivable. Because of the low margin deposits normally required in commodity futures trading, relatively small price movements may result in substantial losses to the Partnership, through its direct investments and investment in the Master.Funds. While substantial losses could lead to a material decrease in liquidity, no such illiquidity occurred in the thirdsecond quarter of 2017.2019.

The Master’sPartnership’s/Funds’ investment in futures, forwards and options may, from time to time, be illiquid. Most U.S. futures exchanges limit fluctuations in prices during a single day by regulations referred to as “daily price fluctuation limits” or “daily limits.” Trades may not be executed at prices beyond the daily limit. If the price for a particular futures or option contract has increased or decreased by an amount equal to the daily limit, positions in that futures or option contract can neither be taken nor liquidated unless traders are willing to effect trades at or within the limit. Futures prices have occasionally moved the daily limit for several consecutive days with little or no trading. These market conditions could prevent the MasterPartnership/Funds from promptly liquidating itstheir futures or option contracts and result in restrictions on redemptions.

Other than the risks inherent in commodity futures, forwards, options and swaps and other derivatives trading, and U.S. Treasury bills and money market mutual fund securities, the Partnership and the Master knowGeneral Partner knows of no trends, demands, commitments, events or uncertainties at the present time thatwhich will result in or which are reasonably likely to result in the Partnership’s or the Master’sPartnership’s/Funds’ liquidity increasing or decreasing in any material way.

The Partnership’s capital consists of the capital contributions of the partners, as increased or decreased by income (loss) from its investment in the Master,realized and/or unrealized gains and losses on trading and by expenses, interest income, subscriptions and redemptions of Redeemable Units and distributions of profits, if any.

For the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2017,2019, Partnership capital decreased 17.7%increased 77.1% from $103,433,044$58,218,866 to $85,154,438.$103,121,210. This decreaseincrease was attributable to redemptionssubscriptions of 17,946.135039,975.1700 Class A limited partner Redeemable Units totaling $23,429,804, redemptions$52,019,698, subscriptions of 904.753599.2020 Class A General PartnerZ limited partner Redeemable Units totaling $1,208,476, redemptions$100,000, subscriptions of 253.0390671.4640 Class Z General Partner Redeemable Units totaling $250,000$680,750 and a net lossincome of $2,827,717,$2,181,988 which was partially offset by subscriptionsredemptions of 6,086.93607,355.4160 Class A limited partner Redeemable Units totaling $8,129,804$9,765,067 and subscriptionsredemptions of 1,307.5870297.7320 Class Z General Partner Redeemable Units totaling $1,307,587.$315,025. Future redemptions can impact the amount of funds available for direct investments and investment in the Master in subsequent periods.

The Master’s capital consists of the capital contributions of the partners as increased or decreased by net realized and/or unrealized gains or losses on futures trading, interest income, expenses, subscriptions, redemptions and distributions of profits, if any.

For the nine months ended September 30, 2017, the Master’s capital decreased 17.7% from $119,845,540 to $98,679,531. This decrease was attributable to redemptions totaling $31,120,725 and distribution of interest income to feeder funds, including the Partnership, totaling $567,238, which was partially offset by net income of $793,054 and subscriptions totaling $9,728,900. Future redemptions can impact the amount of funds available for investment in commodity contract positionsFunds in subsequent periods.

Other than as discussed above, there are no known material trends, favorable or unfavorable, that would affect, nor any expected material changes to, the Partnership’s or the Master’s capital resource arrangements at the present time.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements and Contractual Obligations

The Partnership does not have anyoff-balance sheet arrangements, nor does it have contractual obligations or commercial commitments to make future payments, that would affect its liquidity or capital resources.

 

2021


Critical Accounting Policies

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires the General Partner to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of income and expense during the reporting period.periods. The General Partner believes that the estimates and assumptions utilized in preparing the financial statements are reasonable. ActualAs a result, actual results could differ from those estimates. TheA summary of the Partnership’s significant accounting policies areis described in detail in Note 2, “Basis of Presentation and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies,” of the Financial Statements.

The Partnership recordsPartnership/Funds record all investments at fair value in itstheir respective financial statements, with changes in fair value reported as a component of net realized gains (losses) and net change in unrealized gains (losses) in the respective Statements of Income and Expenses.

Results of Operations

During the Partnership’s thirdsecond quarter of 2017, the net asset value per Redeemable Unit for Class A increased 2.2% from $1,272.66 to $1,300.56, as compared to a decrease of 6.4% in the third quarter of 2016. During the Partnership’s third quarter of 2017, the net asset value per Redeemable Unit for Class Z increased 2.7% from $962.42 to $988.46. The Partnership, through its investment in the Master, experienced a net trading gain before fees and expenses in the third quarter of 2017 of $3,187,375. Gains were primarily attributable to the Master’s trading of commodity futures in livestock, metals and softs and were partially offset by losses in currencies, energy and grains. The Partnership, through its investment in the Master, experienced a net trading loss before fees and expenses in the third quarter of 2016 of $6,194,441. Losses were primarily attributable to the Master’s trading of commodity futures in energy, grains, livestock and metals, and were partially offset by gains in currencies and softs.

The most significant gains were experienced within the livestock market during July and August from short lean hog positions as cash prices fell and forced long speculative investors to liquidate, which then drove prices down further. Additional gains in this sector were achieved during September from bullish live cattle positions as prices rose on technical buying and speculation that prices will rise during the fourth quarter because beef prices were relatively cheap when compared to pork. Within the soft commodities markets, gains were achieved from bullish coffee positions as prices rallied following concerns that the Brazilian crop may not meet expectations. In the metals complex, gains were recorded during September from short positions in copper futures as prices reversed lower amid signs of weakness in China’s economy and concern that copper’s previous run up in price may have been overextended. A portion of the Partnership’s gains for the quarter was offset by losses recorded within the grains sector during August and September from bullish wheat positions as prices declined after the United States Department of Agriculture reported a larger-than-expected Russian production number, which turned the global wheat ending stocks from potentially friendly to negative. Within the energy complex, losses were incurred from long positions in natural gas futures during July and the second half of September as prices decreased amid mild weather and speculation of an increase in stockpiles.

During the Partnership’s nine months ended September 30, 2017,2019, the net asset value per Redeemable Unit for Class A decreased 2.6%1.0% from $1,335.70$1,339.30 to $1,300.56,$1,326.11 as compared to an increase of 7.9% during1.3% in the nine months ended September 30, 2016.second quarter of 2018. During the Partnership’s nine months ended September 30, 2017,second quarter of 2019, the net asset value per Redeemable Unit for Class D decreased 0.7% from $1,044.06 to $1,037.04. During the Partnership’s second quarter of 2019, the net asset value per Redeemable Unit for Class Z decreased 1.2%0.5% from $1,000.00$1,049.22 to $988.46.$1,044.13 as compared to an increase of 1.8% in the second quarter of 2018. The Partnership through its investmentexperienced a net trading loss before fees and expenses during the second quarter of 2019 of $34,710. Losses were primarily attributable to the Partnership’s/Funds’ trading of commodity futures in the Master,energy, livestock and metals and were partially offset by gains in grains and softs. The Partnership experienced a net trading gain before fees and expenses during the nine months ended September 30, 2017second quarter of $1,176,516.2018 of $2,024,781. Gains were primarily attributable to the Master’sPartnership’s/Funds’ trading of commodity futures in grains,energy, livestock, metals and softs and were partially offset by losses in currencies and energy.grains.

The most notable losses were recorded in livestock markets during May and June from long positions in lean hogs futures as prices dropped amid dampened concerns regarding the African swine flu’s effect on supply. Losses within the energy complex were incurred in May from long positions in Brent crude oil and oil distillates as prices suffered amid trade tensions and rising stockpiles. Additional losses in this sector were incurred during June from short positions in natural gas as prices spiked after forecasts of U.S. temperatures rose, increasing the potential of higher electricity demand. Smaller losses were incurred in the metals complex during June from short gold futures positions as prices benefited from weakness in the U.S. dollar and speculation of looser monetary policy globally. The Partnership’s overall trading losses for the quarter were partially offset by trading gains within the soft commodities sector primarily during May from long coffee positions as prices surged on concern that wet weather could delay the harvest or erode bean quality in Brazil, the world’s top coffee bean grower.

During the Partnership’s six months ended June 30, 2019, the net asset value per Redeemable Unit for Class A increased 2.0% from $1,300.66 to $1,326.11 as compared to an increase of 2.3% during the six months ended June 30, 2018. During the Partnership’s six months ended June 30, 2019, the net asset value per Redeemable Unit for Class D increased 2.6% from $1,010.75 to $1,037.04. During the Partnership’s six months ended June 30, 2019, the net asset value per Redeemable Unit for Class Z increased 3.0% from $1,013.83 to $1,044.13 as compared to an increase of 3.4% during the six months ended June 30, 2018. The Partnership through its investment in the Master, experienced a net trading gain before fees and expenses duringfor the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20162019 of $15,191,531.$4,598,839. Gains were primarily attributable to the Master’sPartnership’s/Funds’ trading of commodity futures in currencies, energy, grains, livestock, metals and softs. The Partnership experienced a net trading gain before fees and expenses for the six months ended June 30, 2018 of $3,657,433. Gains were primarily attributable to the Partnership’s/Funds’ trading of commodity futures in energy, grainslivestock, metals and softs and were partially offset by losses in currencies livestock and metals.grains.

The most significant losses were incurred within the energy complex during all three quarters from long positions in natural gas as prices decreased after mild weather throughout much of the U.S. reduced demand from homes and businesses. Additional losses in this complex were experienced during early June from long positions in crude oil as prices decreased as sentiment turned bearish after OPEC announced it would be extending production cuts, but would not make further reductions. The Partnership’s trading losses forDuring the first nine monthshalf of the year, were partially offset by trading gains achieved within the soft commodities during January from coffee and sugar positions both benefiting from higher prices. Additional gains in soft commodities were experienced during June from long cocoa positions as prices moved higher due to flood conditions and unrest in the Ivory Coast. During July, gains were achieved in this sector from bullish coffee positions as prices rallied following concerns that the Brazilian crop may not meet expectations. Gains within the livestock market were experienced during July and August from short lean hog positions as cash prices fell and forced long speculative investors to liquidate. Additional gains were achieved during September from long live cattle positions. Within the grains markets,most notable gains were recorded during JanuaryFebruary, March, and FebruaryApril from long wheat futures positions in Brent crude oil and oil distillates as prices rose after the releaseadvanced amid signs of industry reports which indicated an improved outlooktightening global crude supply and strong U.S. demand for U.S. exports and that U.S. farmers may allocate fewer acres in 2017.distillate products. Additional gains in this sector were experienced within the grains throughout the second quarterduring April from long wheat futures positions as prices increased amid weather related concerns. During July, gains were recorded within this sector from long positions in soybean futures.natural gas positions. Gains within the metals complex were experienced during January and February from long nickelpositions in industrial metals futures as prices rebounded amid a decrease in the relative value of the U.S. dollar and optimism of U.S. trade negotiations with China. In the livestock markets, gains were achieved primarily during February and March from long positions in lean hog futures as prices increased amid a rise in U.S. exports as the African swine virus diminished global supplies. Gains within the soft commodities sector were experienced primarily during May from long coffee positions as prices rallied due to mine closuressurged on concern that wet weather could delay the harvest or erode bean quality in Brazil, the Philippines. Furtherworld’s top coffee bean grower. In the grains sector, smaller gains in the metals complex were achieved during Septemberthroughout the first quarter from short positions in copper futures as prices reversed lower amid signs of weakness in China’s economycorn and concern that copper’s previous run up in price may have been overextended.

wheat.

 

2122


Commodity markets are highly volatile. Broad price fluctuations and rapid inflation increase not only the risks involved in commodity trading, but also increase the possibility of profit. The profitability of the Partnership and the Master dependPartnership/Funds depends on the existence of major price trends and the ability of the AdvisorAdvisors to correctly identify those price trends. Price trends are influenced by, among other things,factors, changing supply and demand relationships, weather, governmental, agricultural, commercial and trade programs and policies, national and international political and economic events and changes in interest rates. To the extent that market trends exist and the Advisor isAdvisors are able to identify them, the Partnership and the MasterPartnership/Funds expect to increase capital through operations.

Interest income on 100% of the average daily equity maintained in cash in the Partnership’s (or the Partnership’s allocable portion of the Master’s)Funds’) brokerage account during each month is earned at a rate equal to the monthly average of the4-week U.S. Treasury bill discount rate. Prior to November 1, 2016, MS&Co. paidFor the Partnershipavoidance of doubt, the Partnership/Funds will not receive interest on 80% of the average daily equity maintained in cashamounts in the Partnership’s (or the Partnership’s allocable portion of the Master’s)futures brokerage account at the rate equalthat are committed to the monthly average of the 4-week U.S. Treasury bill discount rate.margin. Any interest earned on the Partnership’s and/or the Master’sFunds’ account in excess of the amounts described above, if any, will be retained by MS&Co. and/or shared with the General Partner. All other interest income earned on U.S. Treasury bills and money market mutual fund securities will be retained by the Partnership and/or the Master,Funds, as applicable. Interest income allocated from the Masterearned for the three and ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20172019 increased by $143,967$320,170 and $351,058,$681,240, respectively, as compared to the corresponding periods in 2016.2018. The increase in interest income iswas primarily due to higher average daily equity and higher interest rates during the three and ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20172019 as compared to the corresponding periods in 2016.2018. Interest earned by the Partnership will increase the net asset value of the Partnership. The amount of interest income earned by the Partnership depends on (1) the average daily equity maintained in cash in the Partnership’s and/or the Master’sapplicable Funds’ accounts, (2) the amount of U.S. Treasury bills and/or money market mutual fund securities held by the Partnership and/or the MasterFunds and (3) interest rates over which none of the Partnership, the MasterFunds or MS&Co. has control.

Certain clearing fees are based on the number of trades executed by the Advisors for the Partnership/Funds. Accordingly, they must be compared in relation to the number of trades executed during the period. Clearing fees related to direct investments for the three and six months ended June 30, 2019 increased by $175,932 and $377,213, respectively, as compared to the corresponding periods in 2018. The increase in these clearing fees was primarily due to an increase in the number of direct trades made by the Partnership during the three and six months ended June 30, 2019 as compared to the corresponding periods in 2018.

Ongoing selling agent fees are calculated as a percentage of the Partnership’s adjusted net asset value of Class A Redeemable Units and Class D Redeemable Units as of the end of each month and are affected by trading performance, subscriptions and redemptions. Accordingly, they must be analyzed in relation to the fluctuations in the monthly net asset values. Ongoing selling agent fees for the three and ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2017 decreased2019 increased by $143,910$204,778 and $399,539,$407,437, respectively, as compared to the corresponding periods in 2016.2018. This decrease isincrease was due to lowerhigher average net assets attributable to Class A Redeemable Units and Class D Redeemable Units during the three and ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20172019 as compared to the corresponding periods in 2016.2018.

Management fees are calculated as a percentage of the Partnership’s adjusted net assets per Class as of the end of each month and are affected by trading performance, subscriptions and redemptions. Accordingly, they must be analyzed in relation to the fluctuations in the monthly net asset values. Management fees for the three and ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2017 decreased2019 increased by $86,484$144,918 and $238,226,$289,423, respectively, as compared to the corresponding periods in 2016.2018. This decrease isincrease was due to lowerhigher average net assets per Class during the three and ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20172019 as compared to the corresponding periods in 2016.2018.

General Partner fees are paid to the General Partner for administering the business and affairs of the Partnership including, among other things, (i) selecting, appointing and terminating the Partnership’s commodity trading advisoradvisors, (ii) allocating and (ii)reallocating the Partnership’s assets among the commodity trading advisors and (iii) monitoring the activities of the commodity trading advisor.advisors. These fees are calculated as a percentage of the Partnership’s adjusted net assets per Class as of the end of each month and are affected by trading performance, subscriptions and redemptions. Accordingly, they must be analyzed in relation to the fluctuations in the monthly net asset values. General Partner fees for the three and ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2017 decreased2019 increased by $69,187$36,597 and $190,581,$71,731, respectively, as compared to the corresponding periods in 2016.2018. This decrease isincrease was due to lowerhigher average net assets per Class during the three and ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20172019 as compared to the corresponding periods in 2016.2018.

23


Incentive fees are based on the newnet trading profits generated by the Advisor at the end of the quarter, as(as defined in the respective management agreement amongagreements between the Partnership, the General Partner and each Advisor) generated by each Advisor at the Advisor. There were noend of each quarter, half year or year, as applicable. Trading performance for the three months ended June 30, 2019 resulted in a reversal of incentive fees paidof $84,547. Trading performance for the six months ended June 30, 2019 resulted in incentive fees of $287,313. Trading performance for the three and ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20172018 resulted in incentive fees of $341,419 and 2016. The$415,320, respectively. To the extent an Advisor incurs a loss for the Partnership, the Advisor will not be paid incentive fees until thesuch Advisor recovers theany net loss incurred and earns additional new trading profits for the Partnership.

In allocating substantially all of the assets of the Partnership toamong the Master,Advisors, the General Partner considers, among other factors, the Advisor’sAdvisors’ past performance, trading style, volatility of markets traded and fee requirements. The General Partner may modify or terminate the allocation of assets to the AdvisorAdvisors and allocate assets to additional advisors at any time.

As of June 30, 2019 and March 31, 2019, the Partnership’s assets were allocated among the Advisors in the following approximate percentages:

 

Advisor

  

June 30, 2019  

  

June 30, 2019  
(percentage of  
Partners’ Capital)  

  

March 31, 2019*  

  

March 31, 2019  
(percentage of  
  Partners’ Capital)  

Harbour Square

    $                    -       -  %    $            3,786,545    3%

Millburn

  24,035,243    23%      23,405,911    21%

Ospraie

  26,738,418    26%      29,668,813    27%

Aquantum

  22,794,336    22%      26,820,072    25%

Pan

  23,461,256    23%      25,769,674    24%

Northlander

  6,091,957    6%  -        -  %

22

*

Allocation presented is prior to Harbour Square’s termination effective the close of business on March 31, 2019.

24


Item 3.Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk.

All or substantially all of the Partnership’s assets are subject to the risk of trading loss through its investment in the Master. The Partnership and the MasterPartnership/Funds are speculative commodity pools. The market sensitive instruments held by the MasterPartnership/Funds are acquired for speculative trading purposes, and all or substantially all of the Master’sPartnership’s/Funds’ assets are subject to the risk of trading loss. Unlike an operating company, the risk of market sensitive instruments is integral, not incidental, to the Master’s and the Partnership’sPartnership’s/Funds’ main line of business.

The limited partners will not be liable for losses exceeding the current net asset value of their investment.

Market movements result in frequent changes in the fair value of the Master’sPartnership’s/Funds’ open positions and, consequently, in itstheir earnings and cash balances. The Master’sPartnership’s/Funds’ market risk is influenced by a wide variety of factors, including the level and volatility of interest rates, exchange rates, equity price levels, the market value of financial instruments and contracts, the diversification effects among the Master’sPartnership’s/Funds’ open contractspositions and the liquidity of the markets in which it trades.they trade.

The MasterPartnership/Funds rapidly acquiresacquire and liquidatesliquidate both long and short positions in a wide range of different markets. Consequently, it is not possible to predict how a particular future market scenario will affect performance, and the Master’sPartnership’s/Funds’ past performance is not necessarily indicative of its future results.

Quantifying the Master’sPartnership’s and the Funds’ Trading Value at Risk

The following quantitative disclosures regarding the Master’sPartnership’s/Funds’ market risk exposures contain “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the safe harbor from civil liability provided for such statements by the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (set forth in Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”)). All quantitative disclosures in this section are deemed to be forward-looking statements for purposes of the safe harbor, except for statements of historical fact.

The Master accountsPartnership/Funds account for open positions on the basis of fair value accounting principles. Any loss in the market value of the Master’sPartnership’s/Funds’ open positions is directly reflected in the Master’sPartnership’s/Funds’ earnings and cash flow.

The Master’sPartnership’s/Funds’ risk exposure in the market sectors traded by the AdvisorAdvisors is estimated below in terms of Value at Risk. Please note that the Value at Risk model is used to numerically quantify market risk for historic reporting purposes only and is not utilized by either the General Partner or the AdvisorAdvisors in their daily risk management activities.

“Value at Risk” is a measure of the maximum amount which the MasterPartnership/Funds could reasonably be expected to lose in a given market sector. However, the inherent uncertainty of the Master’sPartnership’s/Funds’ speculative trading and the recurrence in the markets traded by the MasterPartnership/Funds of market movements far exceeding expectations could result in actual trading ornon-trading losses far beyond the indicated Value at Risk or the Master’sPartnership’s/Funds’ experience to date (i.e., “risk of ruin”). In light of the foregoing, as well as the risks and uncertainties intrinsic to all future projections, the inclusion of the quantification in this section should not be considered to constitute any assurance or representation that the Master’sPartnership’s/Funds’ losses in any market sector will be limited to Value at Risk or by the Master’sPartnership’s/Funds’ attempts to manage itstheir market risk.

Exchange margin requirements have been used by the MasterPartnership/Funds as the measure of its Value at Risk. Margin requirements are set by exchanges to equal or exceed the maximum losses reasonably expected to be incurred in the fair value of any given contract in95%-99% of anyone-day interval. The margin levels are established by dealers and exchanges using historical price studies as well as an assessment of current market volatility (including the implied volatility of the options on a given futures contract) and economic fundamentals to provide a probabilistic estimate of the maximum expected near-termone-day price fluctuation.

23


Value at Risk tables represent a probabilistic assessment of the risk of loss in market sensitive instruments. Aquantum and Northlander trade the Partnership’s assets indirectly in master fund managed accounts established in the name of the master funds over which they had been granted limited authority to make trading decisions. Harbour Square Master did not have any open positions as of December 31, 2018. Millburn, Ospraie and Pan directly trade managed accounts in the name of the Partnership. The following tables indicate thefirst trading Value at Risk associated withtable reflects the Master’s open positionsmarket sensitive instruments held by market categorythe Partnership directly and through its investments in the Funds as of SeptemberJune 30, 20172019. The remaining trading Value at Risk tables reflect the market sensitive instruments held by the Partnership directly (i.e in the managed accounts in the Partnership’s name traded by certain Advisors) as of June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2016,2018 and the highest, lowest and average value during the three months ended Septemberindirectly by each Fund separately as of June 30, 2017 and during the twelve months ended December 31, 2016. All open position trading risk exposures of the Master2019. There have been included in calculating the figures set forth below. There has been no material changechanges in the trading Value at Risk information previously disclosed in the Partnership’s Annual Report on Form10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016.2018.

25


The following table indicates the trading Value at Risk associated with the Partnership’s open positions by market category as of June 30, 2019. As of June 30, 2019, the Partnership’s total capitalization was $103,121,210.

                                          
June 30, 2019

 

Market Sector

  Value at Risk  % of Total
Capitalization
 

Energy

    $2,971,351      2.88  

Grains

   577,084      0.56   

Livestock

   713,257      0.69   

Metals

   997,845      0.97   

Softs

   744,339      0.72   
  

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total

    $6,003,876      5.82  
  

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

The following tables indicate the trading Value at Risk associated with the Partnership’s direct investments as of June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018 and indirect investment in the Funds as of June 30, 2019, and the highest, lowest and average values during the three months ended June 30, 2019 and the twelve months ended December 31, 2018, as applicable. All open contracts trading risk exposures have been included in calculating the figures set forth below.

As of SeptemberJune 30, 2017,2019 and December 31, 2018, the Master’s total capitalization was $98,679,531 andPartnership’s Value at Risk for the Partnership owned approximately 88.3% of the Master. The Partnership invests substantially allportion of its assets in the Master. The Master’s Value at Risk as of September 30, 2017that are traded directly was as follows:

 

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 
   September 30, 2017        
       Three Months Ended September 30, 2017
June 30, 2019June 30, 2019

 

     % of Total High  Low  Average       Three Months Ended June 30, 2019

Market Sector

  Value at Risk  Capitalization Value at Risk  Value at Risk  

Value at Risk*

  Value at Risk    % of Total  
Capitalization  
 High  
Value at Risk  
  Low  
Value at Risk  
  Average  
Value at Risk*  

Energy

    $            3,950,232                4.00     $        3,950,232     $        1,066,036     $        2,501,469    $2,678,073      2.60   $3,842,122     $2,283,069     $3,018,001   

Grains

   1,815,657    1.84    3,480,889    342,862   2,111,612   534,534      0.52     958,282      419,999      660,070   

Livestock

   943,019    0.96    1,531,671    204,061   908,719   374,029      0.36     1,368,625      110,825      644,441   

Metals

   997,845      0.97     1,633,869      768,280      1,155,470   

Softs

   1,369,745    1.39    1,550,534    190,278   967,558   744,339      0.72     2,302,157      744,339      1,432,376   
  

 

  

 

        

 

  

 

      

Total

    $8,078,653    8.19           $5,328,820      5.17       
  

 

  

 

        

 

  

 

      

* Average ofmonth-end Values at Risk.

As of December 31, 2016, the Master’s total capitalization was $119,845,540 and the Partnership owned approximately 88.1% of the Master. The Partnership invested substantially all of its assets in the Master. The Master’s Value at Risk as of December 31, 2016 was as follows:

   December 31, 2016        
       Twelve Months Ended December 31, 2016

* Average of daily Values at Risk.

* Average of daily Values at Risk.

    

  
December 31, 2018December 31, 2018 
     % of Total High  Low  Average       Twelve Months Ended December 31, 2018

Market Sector

  Value at Risk  Capitalization Value at Risk  Value at Risk  

Value at Risk*

    Value at Risk      % of Total  
    Capitalization    
   High  
  Value  at Risk  
  Low  
Value at Risk  
  Average
Value at Risk*  

Currencies

    $92,400      0.16     $112,860       $                    -         $50,959   

Energy

    $1,198,869    1.00     $6,847,316     $31,218     $        1,716,968   3,193,250      5.48             3,193,250      -         1,285,758   

Grains

   701,140    0.59    3,398,503    29,700   1,312,854   420,242      0.72     1,663,797      -         555,538   

Livestock

   699,318      1.20     699,318      -         161,965   

Metals

   1,616,158      2.78     3,546,300      -         1,831,200   

Softs

   66,475    0.06    1,069,920    56,470   366,104   1,061,055      1.82     1,614,949      -         749,472   
  

 

  

 

        

 

  

 

      

Total

    $1,966,484    1.65           $    7,082,423      12.16       
  

 

  

 

        

 

  

 

      

 

*

Annual average ofmonth-end Values at Risk.

26


As of June 30, 2019, NL Master’s total capitalization was $23,480,066, and the Partnership owned approximately 25.9% of NL Master. As of June 30, 2019, NL Master’s Value at Risk for its assets (including the portion of the Partnership’s assets allocated to NL Master for trading) was as follows:

                                                                                                         
June 30, 2019

 

         Three Months Ended June 30, 2019

 Market Sector

  Value at Risk    % of Total
Capitalization  
  High
Value at Risk  
  Low
Value at Risk  
  Average  
Value at Risk*  

 Energy

  $        321,841      1.37   $        422,518     $        52,753     $        178,796   
  

 

 

 

  

 

 

      

 Total

  $        321,841      1.37       
  

 

 

 

  

 

 

      

*   Average of daily Values at Risk.

 

As of June 30, 2019, Aquantum Master’s total capitalization was $42,033,579, and the Partnership owned approximately 53.9% of Aquantum Master. As of June 30, 2019, Aquantum Master’s Value at Risk for its assets (including the portion of the Partnership’s assets allocated to Aquantum Master for trading) was as follows:

 

    

 

June 30, 2019

 

         Three Months Ended June 30, 2019

 Market Sector

  Value at Risk    % of Total  
  Capitalization  
  High  
Value at Risk  
  Low  
Value at Risk  
  Average  
Value at Risk*  

 Energy

    $           389,464      0.93     $        1,315,641       $        318,276       $        784,409   

 Grains

   78,942      0.19     372,809      74,300      251,572   

 Livestock

   629,365      1.50     1,272,700      333,190      677,441   
  

 

 

 

  

 

 

      

 Total

    $        1,097,771      2.62       
  

 

 

 

  

 

 

      

*

Average of daily Values at Risk.

As of March 31, 2019, the Partnership fully redeemed its investment in Harbour Square Master. As of December 31, 2018, Harbour Square Master’s total capitalization was $7,972,677, and the Partnership owned approximately 68.7% of Harbour Square Master. As of December 31, 2018, Harbour Square Master had no Value at Risk for its assets (including the portion of the Partnership’s assets allocated to Harbour Square Master for trading).

 

2427


Item 4.Controls and Procedures.

The Partnership’s disclosure controls and procedures are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Partnership on the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods expected in the SEC’s rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Partnership in the reports it files is accumulated and communicated to management, including the President and Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”) of the General Partner, to allow for timely decisions regarding required disclosure and appropriate SEC filings.

The General Partner is responsible for ensuring that there is an adequate and effective process for establishing, maintaining and evaluating disclosure controls and procedures for the Partnership’s external disclosures.

The General Partner’s President and CFO have evaluated the effectiveness of the Partnership’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules13a-15(e) and15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act) as of SeptemberJune 30, 2017,2019 and, based on that evaluation, the General Partner’s President and CFO have concluded that, at that date, the Partnership’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective.

The Partnership’sinternal control over financial reporting is a process under the supervision of the General Partner’s President and CFO to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements in accordance with GAAP. These controls include policies and procedures that:

 

pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the Partnership;

 

provide reasonable assurance that (i) transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with GAAP and (ii) the Partnership’s receipts are handled and expenditures are made only pursuant to authorizations of the General Partner; and

 

provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection and correction of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the Partnership’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

There were no changes in the Partnership’sinternal control over financial reporting process during the fiscal quarter ended SeptemberJune 30, 20172019, that materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Partnership’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

2528


PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1.Legal Proceedings.

This section describes the major pending legal proceedings, other than ordinary routine litigation incidental to the business, to which MS&Co. or its subsidiaries is a party or to which any of their property is subject. There are no material legal proceedings pending against the Partnership or the General Partner.

On June 1, 2011, Morgan Stanley & Co. Incorporated converted from a Delaware corporation to a Delaware limited liability company. As a result of that conversion, Morgan Stanley & Co. Incorporated is now named Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC (“MS&Co.”).

MS&Co. is a wholly-owned, indirect subsidiary of Morgan Stanley, a Delaware holding company. Morgan Stanley files periodic reports with the SEC as required by the Exchange Act of 1934, which include current descriptions of material litigation and material proceedings and investigations, if any, by governmental and/or regulatory agencies or self-regulatory organizations concerning Morgan Stanley and its subsidiaries, including MS&Co. As a consolidated subsidiary of Morgan Stanley, MS&Co. does not file its own periodic reports with the SEC that contain descriptions of material litigation, proceedings and investigations. As a result, pleasewe refer you to the “Legal Proceedings” section of Morgan Stanley’s SEC10-K filings for 2018, 2017, 2016, 2015 2014, 2013, and 2012.2014. In addition, MS&Co. annually prepares an Audited, Consolidated Statement of Financial Condition (“Audited Financial Statement”) that is publicly available on Morgan Stanley’s website atwww.morganstanley.com. PleaseWe refer you to the Commitments, Guarantees and Contingencies – Legal section of MS&Co.’s 20162018 Audited Financial Statement and MS&Co’sMid-Year Financials as of June 30, 2017.Statement.

In addition to the matters described in those filings, in the normal course of business, each of Morgan Stanley and MS&Co. has been named, from time to time, as a defendant in various legal actions, including arbitrations, class actions, and other litigation, arising in connection with its activities as a global diversified financial services institution. Certain of the legal actions include claims for substantial compensatory and/or punitive damages or claims for indeterminate amounts of damages. Each of Morgan Stanley and MS&Co. is also involved, from time to time, in investigations and proceedings by governmental and/or regulatory agencies or self-regulatory organizations, certain of which may result in adverse judgments, fines or penalties. The number of these investigations and proceedings has increased in recent years with regard to many financial services institutions, including Morgan Stanley and MS&Co.

MS&Co. is a Delaware limited liability company with its main business office located at 1585 Broadway, New York, New York 10036. Among other registrations and memberships, MS&Co. is registered as a futures commission merchant and is a member of the National Futures Association.

Regulatory and Governmental Matters    Matters.

MS&Co. has received subpoenas and requests for information from certain federal and state regulatory and governmental entities, including among others various members of the RMBS Working Group of the Financial Fraud Enforcement Task Force, such as the United States Department of Justice, Civil Division and several state Attorney General’s Offices, concerning the origination, financing, purchase, securitization and servicing of subprime andnon-subprime residential mortgages and related matters such as residential mortgage backed securities (“RMBS”), collateralized debt obligations (“CDOs”), structured investment vehicles (“SIVs”) and credit default swaps backed by or referencing mortgage pass-through certificates. These matters, some of which are in advanced stages, include, but are not limited to, investigations related to MS&Co.’s due diligence on the loans that it purchased for securitization, MS&Co.’s communications with ratings agencies, MS&Co.’s disclosures to investors, and MS&Co.’s handling of servicing and foreclosure related issues.

On February 25, 2015, MS&Co. reached an agreement in principle with the United States Department of Justice, Civil Division and the United States Attorney’s Office for the Northern District of California, Civil Division (collectively, the “Civil Division”) to pay $2.6 billion to resolve certain claims that the Civil Division indicated it intended to bring against MS&Co. That settlement was finalized on February 10, 2016.

In October 2014, the Illinois Attorney General’s Office (“ILAG”) sent a letter to MS&Co. alleging that MS&Co. knowingly made misrepresentations related to RMBS purchased by certain pension funds affiliated with the State of Illinois and demanding that MS&Co. pay

29


ILAG approximately $88 million. MS&Co. and ILAG reached an agreement to resolve the matter on February 10, 2016.

26


On January 13, 2015, the New York Attorney General’s Office (“NYAG”), which is also a member of the RMBS Working Group, indicated that it intended to file a lawsuit related to approximately 30 subprime securitizations sponsored by MS&Co. NYAG indicated that the lawsuit would allege that MS&Co. misrepresented or omitted material information related to the due diligence, underwriting and valuation of the loans in the securitizations and the properties securing them and indicated that its lawsuit would be brought under the Martin Act. MS&Co. and NYAG reached an agreement to resolve the matter on February 10, 2016.

On June 5, 2012, MS&Co. consented to and became the subject of an Order Instituting Proceedings Pursuant to Sections 6(c) and 6(d) of the Commodity Exchange Act, as amended, Making Findings and Imposing Remedial Sanctions by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (“CFTC”) to resolve allegations related to the failure of a salesperson to comply with exchange rules that prohibitoff-exchange futures transactions unless there is an Exchange for Related Position (“EFRP”). Specifically, the CFTC found that from April 2008 through October 2009, MS&Co. violated Section 4c(a) of the Commodity Exchange Act and CFTC Regulation 1.38 by executing, processing and reporting numerousoff-exchange futures trades to the Chicago Mercantile Exchange (“CME”) and Chicago Board of Trade (“CBOT”) as EFRPs in violation of CME and CBOT rules because those trades lacked the corresponding and related cash, OTC swap, OTC option, or other OTC derivative position. In addition, the CFTC found that MS&Co. violated CFTC Regulation 166.3 by failing to supervise the handling of the trades at issue and failing to have adequate policies and procedures designed to detect and deter the violations of the Commodity Exchange Act and CFTC Regulations. Without admitting or denying the underlying allegations and without adjudication of any issue of law or fact, MS&Co. accepted and consented to entry of findings and the imposition of a cease and desist order, a fine of $5,000,000, and undertakings related to public statements, cooperation and payment of the fine. MS&Co. entered into corresponding and related settlements with the CME and CBOT in which the CME found that MS&Co. violated CME Rules 432.Q and 538 and fined MS&Co. $750,000 and CBOT found that MS&Co. violated CBOT Rules 432.Q and 538 and fined MS&Co. $1,000,000.

On July 23, 2014, the SEC approved a settlement by MS&Co. and certain affiliates to resolve an investigation related to certain subprime RMBS transactions sponsored and underwritten by those entities in 2007. Pursuant to the settlement, MS&Co. and certain affiliates were charged with violating Sections 17(a)(2) and 17(a)(3) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, agreed to pay disgorgement and penalties in an amount of $275 million and neither admitted nor denied the SEC’s findings.

On April 21, 2015, the Chicago Board Options Exchange, Incorporated (“CBOE”)(CBOE) and the CBOE Futures Exchange, LLC (“CFE”)(CFE) filed statements of charges against MS&Co. in connection with trading by one of MS&Co.’s former traders of EEM options contracts that allegedly disrupted the final settlement price of the November 2012 VXEM futures. CBOE alleged that MS&Co. violated CBOE Rules 4.1, 4.2 and 4.7, Sections 9(a) and 10(b) of the Exchange Act, and Rule10b-5 thereunder. CFE alleged that MS&Co. violated CFE Rules 608, 609 and 620. The matters were resolved on July 12, 2016 and June 28, 2016, respectively, without any findings of fraud. Pursuant to the settlements, MS&Co. was required to pay a $750,000 penalty to the CBOE (for which MS&Co. and an individual were jointly and severally liable) and a $400,000 penalty to the CFE (for which MS&Co. and an individual were jointly and severally liable) and $152,664 in disgorgement.

On June 18, 2015, MS&Co. entered into a settlement with the SEC and paid a fine of $500,000 as part of the Municipalities Continuing Disclosure CooperationCorporation Initiative to resolve allegations that MS&Co. failed to form a reasonable basis through adequate due diligence for believing the truthfulness of the assertions by issuers and/or obligors regarding their compliance with previous continuing disclosure undertakings pursuant to Rule15c2-12 under the Exchange Act in connection with offerings in which MS&Co. acted as senior or sole underwriter.

On August 6, 2015, MS&Co. consented to and became the subject of an order by the CFTC to resolve allegations that MS&Co. violated CFTC Regulation 22.9(a) by failing to hold sufficient U.S. dollarsUS Dollars in cleared swap segregated accounts in the United States to meet all U.S.US dollar obligations to cleared swaps customers. Specifically, the CFTC found that while MS&Co. at all times held sufficient funds in segregation to cover its obligations to its customers, on certain days during 2013 and 2014, it held currencies, such as euros, instead of U.S.US dollars, to meet its U.S.US dollar obligations. In addition, the CFTC found that MS&Co. violated CFTC Regulation 166.3 by failing to have in place adequate procedures to ensure that it complied with CFTC Regulation 22.9(a). Without admitting or denying the findings or conclusions and without adjudication of any issue of law or fact, MS&Co. accepted and consented to the entry of findings, the imposition of a cease and desist order, a civil monetary penalty of $300,000, and undertakings related to public statements, cooperation, and payment of the monetary penalty.

 

2730


On December 20, 2016, MS&Co. consented to and became the subject of an order by the SEC in connection with allegations that MS&Co. willfully violated Sections 15(c)(3) and 17(a)(1) of the Exchange Act and Rules15c3-3(e),17a-5(a), 17a-5(a), and17a-5(d) thereunder, by inaccurately calculating its Reserve Account requirement under Rule15c3-3 by including margin loans to an affiliate in its calculations, which resulted in making inaccurate records and submitting inaccurate reports to the SEC. Without admitting or denying the underlying allegations and without adjudication of any issue of law or fact, MS&Co. consented to a cease and desist order, a censure, and a civil monetary penalty of $7,500,000.

On September 28, 2017, the CFTC issued an order filing and simultaneously settling charges against MS&Co. regarding violations of CFTC Rule 166.3 by failing to diligently supervise the reconciliation of exchange and clearing fees with the amounts it ultimately charged customers for certain transactions on multiple exchanges. The order and settlement required MS&Co. to pay a $500,000 penalty and cease and desist from violating Rule 166.3.

On November 2, 2017, the CFTC issued an order filing and simultaneously settling charges against MS&Co. fornon-compliance with applicable rules governing Part 17 Large Trader reports to the CFTC. The order requires MS&Co. to pay a $350,000 penalty and cease and desist from further violations of the Commodity Exchange Act.

Civil Litigation

On July 15, 2010, China Development Industrial Bank (“CDIB”) filed a complaint against MS&Co., styledChinaDevelopment Industrial Bank v. Morgan Stanley & Co. Incorporated et alal.., which is pending in the Supreme Court of the State of New York, New York County (“Supreme Court of NY”). The complaint relates to a $275 million credit default swap referencing the super senior portion of the STACK2006-1 CDO. The complaint asserts claims for common law fraud, fraudulent inducement and fraudulent concealment and alleges that MS&Co. misrepresented the risks of the STACK2006-1 CDO to CDIB, and that MS&Co. knew that the assets backing the CDO were of poor quality when it entered into the credit default swap with CDIB. The complaint seeks compensatory damages related to the approximately $228 million that CDIB alleges it has already lost under the credit default swap, rescission of CDIB’s obligation to pay an additional $12 million, punitive damages, equitable relief, fees and costs. On February 28, 2011, the court denied MS&Co.’s motion to dismiss the complaint. On June 27, 2018, MS&Co. filed a motion for summary judgment and spoliation sanctions against CDIB. On December 21, 2018, the court denied MS&Co.’s motion for summary judgment and granted in part MS&Co,’s motion for sanctions relating to the spoliation of evidence. On January 18, 2019, CDIB filed a motion to clarify and resettle the portion of the court’s December 21, 2018 order granting spoliation sanctions. On January 24, 2019, CDIB filed a notice of appeal from the court’s December 21, 2018 order, and on January 25, 2019, MS&Co. filed a notice of appeal from the same order. On March 7, 2019, the court denied the relief that CDIB sought in a motion to clarify and resettle the portion of the court’s December 21, 2018 order granting spoliation sanctions. Based on currently available information, MS&Co. believes it could incur a loss in this action of up to approximately $240 million pluspre- and post-judgment interest, fees and costs.

31


On October 15, 2010, the Federal Home Loan Bank of Chicago filed a complaint against MS&Co. and other defendants in the Circuit Court of the State of Illinois, styledFederal Home Loan Bank of Chicago v. Bank of America Funding Corporation et al.al. A corrected amended complaint was filed on April 8, 2011, which alleges that defendants made untrue statements and material omissions in the sale to plaintiff of a number of mortgage pass-through certificates backed by securitization trusts containing residential mortgage loans and asserts claims under Illinois law. The total amount of certificates allegedly sold to plaintiff by MS&Co. at issue in the action was approximately $203 million. The complaint seeks, among other things, to rescind the plaintiff’s purchase of such certificates. The defendants filed a motion to dismiss the corrected amended complaint on May 27, 2011, which was denied on September 19, 2012. On December 13, 2013, the court entered an order dismissing all claims related to one of the securitizations at issue. On January 18, 2017, the court entered an order dismissing all claims related to an additional securitization at issue. After that dismissal,those dismissals, the remaining amount of certificates allegedly issued by MS&Co. or sold to plaintiff by MS&Co. was approximately $78$65 million. At SeptemberMarch 25, 2017,2019, the current unpaid balance of the mortgage pass-through certificates at issue in this action was approximately $45$36 million, and the certificates had not yet incurred actual losses. Based on currently available information, MS&Co. believes it could incur a loss in this action up to the difference between the $45$36 million unpaid balance of these certificates (plus any losses incurred) and their fair market value at the time of a judgment against MS&Co., pluspre- and post-judgment interest, fees and costs. MS&Co. may be entitled to be indemnified for some of these losses and to an offset for interest received by the plaintiff prior to a judgment.

28


On April 20, 2011, the Federal Home Loan Bank of Boston filed a complaint against MS&Co. and other defendants in the Superior Court of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts styledFederal Home Loan Bank of Boston v. Ally Financial, Inc. F/K/A GMAC LLC et al. An amended complaint was filed on June 29, 2012 and alleges that defendants made untrue statements and material omissions in the sale to plaintiff of certain mortgage pass-through certificates backed by securitization trusts containing residential mortgage loans. The total amount of certificates allegedly issued by MS&Co. or sold to plaintiff by MS&Co. was approximately $385 million. The amended complaint raises claims under the Massachusetts Uniform Securities Act, the Massachusetts Consumer Protection Act and common law and seeks, among other things, to rescind the plaintiff’s purchase of such certificates. On May 26, 2011, defendants removed the case to the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts. The defendants’ motions to dismiss the amended complaint were granted in part and denied in part on September 30, 2013. On November 25, 2013, July 16, 2014, and May��19, 2015, respectively, the plaintiff voluntarily dismissed its claims against MS&Co. with respect to three of the securitizations at issue. After these voluntary dismissals, the remaining amount of certificates allegedly issued by MS&Co. or sold to plaintiff by MS&Co. was approximately $332 million. On February 6, 2017, the action was remanded to the Superior Court of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. At September 25, 2017, the current unpaid balance of the mortgage pass-through certificates at issue in this action was approximately $47 million, and the certificates had not yet incurred actual losses. Based on currently available information, MS&Co. believes it could incur a loss in this action up to the difference between the $47 million unpaid balance of these certificates (plus any losses incurred) and their fair market value at the time of a judgment against MS&Co., or upon sale, pluspre- and post-judgment interest, fees and costs. MS&Co. may be entitled to be indemnified for some of these losses and to an offset for interest received by the plaintiff prior to a judgment.

On May 3, 2013, plaintiffs inDeutscheZentral-Genossenschaftsbank AG et al. v. Morgan Stanley et al.filed a complaint against MS&Co., certain affiliates, and other defendants in the Supreme Court of NY. The complaint alleges that defendants made material misrepresentations and omissions in the sale to plaintiffs of certain mortgage pass-through certificates backed by securitization trusts containing residential mortgage loans. The total amount of certificates allegedly sponsored, underwritten and/or sold by MS&Co. to plaintiff was approximately $644 million. The complaint alleges causes of action against MS&Co. for common law fraud, fraudulent concealment, aiding and abetting fraud, negligent misrepresentation, and rescission and seeks, among other things, compensatory and punitive damages. On June 10, 2014, the court granted in part and denied in part MS&Co.’s motion to dismiss the complaint. On June 20, 2017 the Appellate Division, First Department, affirmed the lower court’s June 10, 2014 order. On July 28, 2017, MS&Co. filed a motion for leave to appeal that decision to the New York Court of Appeals. On October 3, 2017, the Appellate Division, First Department denied MS&Co.’s motion for leave to appeal. At September 25, 2017, the current unpaid balance of the mortgage pass-through certificates at issue in this action was approximately $232 million, and the certificates had incurred actual losses of approximately $87 million. Based on currently available information, MS&Co. believes it could incur a loss in this action up to the difference between the $232 million unpaid balance of these certificates (plus any losses incurred) and their fair market value at the time of a judgment against MS&Co., or upon sale, pluspre- and post-judgment interest, fees and costs. MS&Co. may be entitled to be indemnified for some of these losses.

On May 17, 2013, plaintiff inIKB International S.A. in Liquidation, et al. v. Morgan Stanley, et al.al. filed a complaint against MS&Co. and certain affiliates in the Supreme Court of NY. The complaint alleges that defendants made material misrepresentations and omissions in the sale to plaintiff of certain mortgage pass-through certificates backed by securitization trusts containing residential mortgage loans. The total amount of certificates allegedly sponsored, underwritten and/or sold by MS&Co. to plaintiff was approximately $132$133 million. The complaint alleges causes of action against MS&Co. for common law fraud, fraudulent concealment, aiding and abetting fraud, and negligent misrepresentation, and seeks, among other things, compensatory and punitive damages. On October 29, 2014, the court granted in part and denied in part MS&Co.’s motion to dismiss. All claims regarding four certificates were dismissed. After these dismissals, the remaining amount of certificates allegedly issued by MS&Co. or sold to plaintiff by MS&Co. was approximately $116 million. On August 26, 2015, MS&Co. perfected its appeal from the court’s October 29, 2014 decision. On August 11, 2016, the Appellate Division, First Department affirmed the trial court’s decision denying in part MS&Co.’s motion to dismiss the complaint. At SeptemberMarch 25, 2017,2019, the current unpaid balance of the mortgage pass-through certificates at issue in this action was approximately $25$23 million, and the certificates had incurred actual losses of $58 million. Based on currently available information, MS&Co. believes it could incur a loss in this action up to the difference between the $25$23 million unpaid balance of these certificates (plus any losses incurred) and their fair market value at the time of a judgment against MS&Co., or upon sale, pluspre- and post-judgment interest, fees and costs. MS&Co. may be entitled to be indemnified for some of these losses and to an offset for interest received by the plaintiff prior to a judgment.

29


On April 1, 2016,In August of 2017, MS&Co. was named as a defendant in a purported antitrust class action in the California Attorney General’s Office filed an action against MS&Co. in California state courtUnited States District Court for the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York styledCalifornia v. Morgan Stanley, et al., on behalf of California investors, including the CaliforniaIowa Public Employees’ Retirement System et al. v. Bank of America Corporation et al. Plaintiffs allege, inter alia, that MS&Co., together with a number of other financial institution defendants, violated U.S. antitrust laws and New York state law in connection with their alleged efforts to prevent the California Teachers’ Retirement System.development of electronic exchange-based platforms for securities lending. The class action complaint was filed on behalf of a purported

32


class of borrowers and lenders who entered into stock loan transactions with the defendants. The class action complaint seeks, among other relief, certification of the class of plaintiffs and treble damages. On September 27, 2018, the court denied the defendants’ motion to dismiss the class action complaint.

Beginning on March 25, 2019, MS&Co. was named as a defendant in a series of putative class action complaints filed in the Southern District of New York, the first of which was styledAlaska Electrical Pension Fund v. BofA Secs., Inc., et al. Each complaint alleges that MS&Co. made misrepresentationsa conspiracy to fix prices and omissions regarding residential mortgage-backed securities and notesrestrain competition in the market for unsecured bonds issued by the Cheyne SIV (defined below),following Government-Sponsored Enterprises: the Federal National Mortgage Association; the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation; the Federal Farm Credit Banks Funding Corporation; and asserts violationsthe Federal Home Loan Banks. Each complaint raises a claim under Section 1 of the California False ClaimsSherman Act and seeks, among other state lawsthings, injunctive relief and seeks treble damages, civil penalties, disgorgement, and injunctive relief.compensatory damages. On September 30, 2016,May 23, 2019, plaintiffs filed a consolidated amended class action complaint, now styled In re GSE Bonds Antitrust Litigation. The purported class period in the court granted MS&Co.’s demurrer, with leaveconsolidated amended complaint is now from January 1, 2009 to replead.January 1, 2016. On October 21, 2016,June 13, 2019, the California Attorney Generaldefendants filed an amended complaint. On January 25, 2017,a joint motion to dismiss the court denied MS&Co.’s demurrer with respect to theconsolidated amended complaint.

Settled Civil Litigation

On August 25, 2008, MS&Co. and two ratings agencies were named as defendants in a purported class action related to securities issued by a structured investment vehicle called Cheyne Finance PLC and Cheyne Finance LLC (together, the “Cheyne SIV”). The case was styledAbu Dhabi Commercial Bank, et al. v. Morgan Stanley & Co. Inc., et al. The complaint alleged, among other things, that the ratings assigned to the securities issued by the Cheyne SIV were false and misleading, including because the ratings did not accurately reflect the risks associated with the subprime residential mortgage backed securities held by the Cheyne SIV. The plaintiffs asserted allegations of aiding and abetting fraud and negligent misrepresentation relating to approximately $852 million of securities issued by the Cheyne SIV. On April 24, 2013, the parties reached an agreement to settle the case, and on April 26, 2013, the court dismissed the action with prejudice.

On December 23, 2009, the Federal Home Loan Bank of Seattle filed a complaint against MS&Co. and another defendant in the Superior Court of the State of Washington, styledFederal Home Loan Bank of Seattle v. Morgan Stanley & Co. Inc., et al.al. The amended complaint, filed on September 28, 2010, allegesalleged that defendants made untrue statements and material omissions in the sale to plaintiff of certain mortgage pass-through certificates backed by securitization trusts containing residential mortgage loans. The total amount of certificates allegedly sold to plaintiff by MS&Co. was approximately $233 million. The complaint raisesraised claims under the Washington State Securities Act and seeks,sought, among other things, to rescind the plaintiff’s purchase of such certificates. On January 23, 2017, the parties reached an agreement to settle the litigation.

On March 15, 2010, the Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco filed a complaint against MS&Co. and other defendants in the Superior Court of the State of California styledFederal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco v. Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC, et al. An amended complaint filed on June 10, 2010 alleged that defendants made untrue statements and material omissions in connection with the sale to plaintiff of a number of mortgage pass-through certificates backed by securitization trusts containing residential mortgage loans. The amount of certificates allegedly sold to plaintiff by MS&Co. was approximately $704 million. The complaint raised claims under both the federal securities laws and California law and sought, among other things, to rescind the plaintiff’s purchase of such certificates. On January 26, 2015, as a result of a settlement with certain other defendants, the plaintiff requested and the court subsequently entered a dismissal with prejudice of certain of the plaintiff’s claims, including all remaining claims against MS&Co.

On March 15, 2010, the Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco filed a complaint against MS&Co. and other defendants in the Superior Court of the State of California styledFederal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco v. Deutsche Bank Securities Inc. et al.al. An amended complaint, filed on June 10, 2010, allegesalleged that defendants made untrue statements and material omissions in connection with the sale to plaintiff of certain mortgage pass-through certificates backed by securitization trusts containing residential mortgage loans. The amount of certificates allegedly sold to plaintiff by MS&Co. was approximately $276 million. The complaint raises raised

33


claims under both the federal securities laws and California law and seeks,sought, among other things, to rescind the plaintiff’s purchase of such certificates. On December 21, 2016, the parties reached an agreement to settle the litigation.

30


On July 9, 2010 and February 11, 2011, Cambridge Place Investment Management Inc. filed two separate complaints against MS&Co. and/or its affiliates and other defendants in the Superior Court of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, both styledCambridge Place Investment Management Inc. v. Morgan Stanley & Co., Inc., et al. The complaints asserted claims on behalf of certain clients of plaintiff’s affiliates and alleged that defendants made untrue statements and material omissions in the sale of a number of mortgage pass-through certificates backed by securitization trusts containing residential mortgage loans. The total amount of certificates allegedly issued by MS&Co. and/or its affiliates or sold to plaintiff’s affiliates’ clients by MS&Co. and/or its affiliates in the two matters was approximately $263 million. On February 11, 2014, the parties entered into an agreement to settle the litigation. On February 20, 2014, the court dismissed the action.

On October 25, 2010, MS&Co., certain affiliates and Pinnacle Performance Limited, a special purpose vehicle (“SPV”), were named as defendants in a purported class action in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (“SDNY”), styledGe Dandong, et al. v. Pinnacle Performance Ltd., et al. On January 31, 2014, the plaintiffs in the action, which related to securities issued by the SPV in Singapore, filed a second amended complaint, which asserted common law claims of fraud, aiding and abetting fraud, fraudulent inducement, aiding and abetting fraudulent inducement, and breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing. On July 17, 2014, the parties reached an agreement to settle the litigation, which received final court approval on July 2, 2015.

On July 5, 2011, Allstate Insurance Company and certain of its affiliated entities filed a complaint against MS&Co. in the Supreme Court of NY, styledAllstate Insurance Company, et al. v. Morgan Stanley, et al. An amended complaint was filed on September 9, 2011, and alleged that the defendants made untrue statements and material omissions in the sale to the plaintiffs of certain mortgage pass-through certificates backed by securitization trusts containing residential mortgage loans. The total amount of certificates allegedly issued and/or sold to the plaintiffs by MS&Co. was approximately $104 million. The complaint raised common law claims of fraud, fraudulent inducement, aiding and abetting fraud, and negligent misrepresentation and seeks,sought, among other things, compensatory and/or recessionary damages associated with the plaintiffs’ purchases of such certificates. On January 16, 2015, the parties reached an agreement to settle the litigation.

On July 18, 2011, the Western and Southern Life Insurance Company and certain affiliated companies filed a complaint against MS&Co. and other defendants in the Court of Common Pleas in Ohio, styledWestern and Southern Life Insurance Company, et al. v. Morgan Stanley Mortgage Capital Inc., et al. An amended complaint was filed on April 2, 2012 and alleged that defendants made untrue statements and material omissions in the sale to plaintiffs of certain mortgage pass-through certificates backed by securitization trusts containing residential mortgage loans. The amount of the certificates allegedly sold to plaintiffs by MS&Co. was approximately $153 million. On June 8, 2015, the parties reached an agreement to settle the litigation.

On September 2, 2011, the Federal Housing Finance Agency, as conservator for Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, filed 17 complaints against numerous financial services companies, including MS&Co. and certain affiliates. A complaint against MS&Co. and certain affiliates and other defendants was filed in the Supreme Court of NY, styledFederal Housing Finance Agency, as Conservator v. Morgan Stanley et al. The complaint alleged that defendants made untrue statements and material omissions in connection with the sale to Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac of residential mortgage pass-through certificates with an original unpaid balance of approximately $11 billion. The complaint raised claims under federal and state securities laws and common law and sought, among other things, rescission and compensatory and punitive damages. On February 7, 2014, the parties entered into an agreement to settle the litigation. On February 20, 2014, the court dismissed the action.

On April 25, 2012, Metropolitan Life Insurance Company and certain affiliates filed a complaint against MS&Co. and certain affiliates in the Supreme Court of NY, styledMetropolitan Life Insurance Company, et al. v. Morgan Stanley, et al. An amended complaint was filed on June 29, 2012, and alleged that the defendants made untrue statements and material omissions in the sale to the plaintiffs of certain mortgage pass-through certificates backed by securitization trusts containing residential mortgage loans. The total amount of certificates allegedly sponsored, underwritten, and/or sold by MS&Co. was approximately $758 million. The amended complaint raised common law claims of fraud, fraudulent inducement, and aiding and abetting fraud and sought, among other things, rescission, compensatory, and/or rescissionary damages, as well as punitive damages, associated with the plaintiffs’ purchases of such certificates. On April 11, 2014, the parties entered into a settlement agreement.

31


On April 25, 2012, The Prudential Insurance Company of America and certain affiliates filed a complaint against MS&Co. and certain affiliates in the Superior Court of the State of New Jersey, styledThe Prudential Insurance Company of America, et al. v. Morgan Stanley, et al. On October 16, 2012, plaintiffs filed an amended complaint. The amended complaint alleged that defendants made untrue statements and material omissions in connection with the sale to plaintiffs of certain mortgage pass-through certificates backed by securitization trusts containing residential mortgage loans. The total amount of certificates allegedly sponsored, underwritten and/or sold by MS&Co. was approximately $1.073 billion. The amended complaint raised claims under the New Jersey Uniform Securities Law, as well as common law claims of negligent misrepresentation, fraud, fraudulent inducement, equitable fraud, aiding and abetting fraud, and violations of the New Jersey Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act,RICO statute, and included a claim for treble damages. On January 8, 2016, the parties reached an agreement to settle the litigation.

In re Morgan Stanley Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Litigation, which had been pending in the SDNY, was a putative class action involving allegations that, among other things,

34


the registration statements and offering documents related to the offerings of certain mortgage pass-through certificates in 2006 and 2007 contained false and misleading information concerning the pools of residential loans that backed these securitizations. On December 18, 2014, the parties’ agreement to settle the litigation received final court approval, and on December 19, 2014, the court entered an order dismissing the action.

On November 4, 2011, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”), as receiver for Franklin Bank S.S.B, filed two complaints against MS&Co. in the District Court of the State of Texas. Each was styledFederal Deposit Insurance Corporation as Receiver for Franklin Bank, S.S.B v. Morgan Stanley & Company LLC F/K/A Morgan Stanley & Co. Inc.and alleged that MS&Co. made untrue statements and material omissions in connection with the sale to plaintiff of mortgage pass-through certificates backed by securitization trusts containing residential mortgage loans. The amount of certificates allegedly underwritten and sold to plaintiff by MS&Co. in these cases was approximately $67 million and $35 million, respectively. On July 2, 2015, the parties reached an agreement to settle the litigation.

On February 14, 2013, Bank Hapoalim B.M. filed a complaint against MS&Co. and certain affiliates in the Supreme Court of NY, styledBank Hapoalim B.M. v. Morgan Stanley et al.al. The complaint alleged that defendants made material misrepresentations and omissions in the sale to plaintiff of certain mortgage pass-through certificates backed by securitization trusts containing residential mortgage loans. The total amount of certificates allegedly sponsored, underwritten and/or sold by MS&Co. to plaintiff was approximately $141 million. On July 28, 2015, the parties reached an agreement to settle the litigation, and on August 12, 2015, the plaintiff filed a stipulation of discontinuance with prejudice.

On September 23, 2013, the plaintiff inNational Credit Union Administration Board v. Morgan Stanley & Co. Inc., et al.al. filed a complaint against MS&Co. and certain affiliates in the SDNY. The complaint alleged that defendants made untrue statements of material fact or omitted to state material facts in the sale to the plaintiff of certain mortgage pass-through certificates issued by securitization trusts containing residential mortgage loans. The total amount of certificates allegedly sponsored, underwritten and/or sold by MS&Co. to plaintiffs in the matter was approximately $417 million. The complaint alleged violations of federal and various state securities laws and sought, among other things, rescissionary and compensatory damages. On November 23, 2015, the parties reached an agreement to settle the matter.

On September 16, 2014, the Virginia Attorney General’s Office filed a civil lawsuit, styledCommonwealth of Virginia ex rel. Integra REC LLC v. Barclays Capital Inc., et al.,, against MS&Co. and several other defendants in the Circuit Court of the City of Richmond related to RMBS. The lawsuit alleged that MS&Co. and the other defendants knowingly made misrepresentations and omissions related to the loans backing RMBS purchased by the Virginia Retirement System. The complaint asserted claims under the Virginia Fraud Against Taxpayers Act, as well as common law claims of actual and constructive fraud, and sought, among other things, treble damages and civil penalties. On January 6, 2016, the parties reached an agreement to settle the litigation. An order dismissing the action with prejudice was entered on January 28, 2016.

On April 20, 2011, the Federal Home Loan Bank of Boston filed a complaint against MS&Co. and other defendants in the Superior Court of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts styledFederal Home Loan Bank of Boston v. Ally Financial, Inc. F/K/A GMAC LLC et al. An amended complaint was filed on June 29, 2012 and alleged that defendants made untrue statements and material omissions in the sale to plaintiff of certain mortgage pass-through

35


certificates backed by securitization trusts containing residential mortgage loans. The total amount of certificates allegedly issued by MS&Co. or sold to plaintiff by MS&Co. was approximately $385 million. The amended complaint raised claims under the Massachusetts Uniform Securities Act, the Massachusetts Consumer Protection Act and common law and sought, among other things, to rescind the plaintiff’s purchase of such certificates. On November 25, 2013, July 16, 2014, and May 19, 2015, respectively, the plaintiff voluntarily dismissed its claims against MS&Co. with respect to three of the securitizations at issue. After these voluntary dismissals, the remaining amount of certificates allegedly issued by MS&Co. or sold to plaintiff by MS&Co. was approximately $332 million. On July 13, 2018, the parties reached an agreement in principle to settle the litigation.

On May 3, 2013, plaintiffs inDeutsche Zentral-Genossenschaftsbank AG et al. v. Morgan Stanley et al. filed a complaint against the Firm, certain affiliates, and other defendants in the Supreme Court of NY. The complaint alleged that defendants made material misrepresentations and omissions in the sale to plaintiffs of certain mortgage pass-through certificates backed by securitization trusts containing residential mortgage loans. The total amount of certificates allegedly sponsored, underwritten and/or sold by the Firm to plaintiff was approximately $634 million. The complaint alleged causes of action against the Firm for common law fraud, fraudulent concealment, aiding and abetting fraud, negligent misrepresentation, and rescission and seeks, among other things, compensatory and punitive damages. On June 26, 2018, the parties entered into an agreement to settle the litigation.

On April 1, 2016, the California Attorney General’s Office filed an action against MS&Co. in California state court styledCalifornia v. Morgan Stanley, et al., on behalf of California investors, including the California Public Employees’ Retirement System and the California Teachers’ Retirement System. The complaint alleged that MS&Co. made misrepresentations and omissions regarding residential mortgage-backed securities and notes issued by the Cheyne SIV, and asserts violations of the California False Claims Act and other state laws and sought treble damages, civil penalties, disgorgement, and injunctive relief. On April 24, 2019, the parties reached an agreement to settle the litigation.

Additional lawsuits containing claims similar to those described above may be filed in the future. In the course of its business, MS&Co., as a major futures commission merchant, is party to various civil actions, claims and routine regulatory investigations and proceedings that the General Partner believes do not have a material effect on the business of MS&Co. MS&Co. may establish reserves from time to time in connections with such actions.

 

3236


Item lA.Risk Factors.

Item 1A. Risk Factors.

There have been no material changes to the risk factors set forth under Part I, Item 1A. “Risk Factors.” in the Partnership’s Annual Report on Form10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 20162018 and under Part II, Item 1A. “Risk Factors.” in the Partnership’s Quarterly ReportsReport on Form10-Q for the quartersquarter ended March 31, 20172019.

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and June 30, 2017.Use of Proceeds.

Item 2.Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.

For the three months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2017,2019, there were no subscriptions of 728.4280 Class A limited partner Redeemable Units.Units totaling $976,785. Redeemable Units are issued in reliance upon applicable exemptions from registration under Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act and Section 506 of Regulation D promulgated thereunder. Redeemable Units are purchased by accredited investors, as defineddescribed in Regulation D. In determining the applicability of the exemption, the General Partner relies on the fact that Redeemable Units are purchased by accredited investors in a private offering.

Proceeds from the sale of Redeemable Units are used for the trading of commodity interests including futures, option and forward contracts and any other interests pertaining thereto, including interests in commodity pools.contracts.

The following chart sets forth the purchases of limited partner Redeemable Units for each Class by the Partnership.

 

                                                                                                
Period  

Class A (a) Total  

Number of  
Redeemable Units  
Purchased*  

  

Class A (b) Average  

Price Paid per  

Redeemable Unit**  

  

(c) Total Number of  
Redeemable Units  

Purchased as Part of  

Publicly Announced  
Plans or Programs  

  

(d) Maximum Number  

(or Approximate Dollar  
Value) of Redeemable  
Units that May Yet Be  
Purchased Under the  
Plans or Programs  

July 1, 2017 - July 31, 2017

   1,152.7800   $1,311.69    N/A    N/A 

August 1, 2017 - August 31, 2017

   1,134.5890   $1,303.55    N/A    N/A 

September 1, 2017 - September 30, 2017  

   1,339.6960   $1,300.56    N/A    N/A 
    3,627.0650   $1,305.03           
                                                                                    
Period  Class A (a) Total
Number of
Redeemable Units  
Purchased *
  Class A (b) Average  
Price Paid per
Redeemable Unit **  
  (c) Total Number of
Redeemable Units
Purchased as Part of  
Publicly Announced
Plans or Programs
  (d) Maximum Number (or 
Approximate Dollar
Value) of Redeemable
Units that May Yet Be
Purchased Under the
Plans or Programs

April 1, 2019 - April 30, 2019

   1,083.8090    $1,348.35    N/A    N/A 

May 1, 2019 - May 31, 2019

   1,269.8900    $1,344.11    N/A    N/A 

June 1, 2019 - June 30, 2019

   2,108.2950    $1,326.11    N/A    N/A 
    4,461.9940    $1,336.63           

 

*

Generally, limited partners are permitted to redeem their Redeemable Units as of the end of each month on three business days’ notice to the General Partner. Under certain circumstances, the General Partner can compel redemption, although to date the General Partner has not exercised this right. Purchases of Redeemable Units by the Partnership reflected in the chart above were made in the ordinary course of the Partnership’s business in connection with effecting redemptions for limited partners.

 

**

Redemptions of Redeemable Units are effected as of the last dayend of each month at the net asset value per Redeemable Unit as of that day. No fee will be charged for redemptions.

Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities. —None.

Item 3.

Item 4. Mine Safety DisclosuresDefaults Upon Senior Securities.Not Applicable.

Item 5. Other Information. —None.

Item 4.Mine Safety Disclosures.— Not Applicable.

Item 5.Other Information.— None.

 

3337


Item 6.Exhibits.Exhibits.

 

31.1

  

Rule13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification (Certification of President and Director) (filed herewith).

31.2

  

Rule13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification (Certification of Chief Financial Officer and Director) (filed herewith).

32.1

  

Section 1350 Certification (Certification of President and Director) (filed herewith).

32.2

  

Section  1350 Certification (Certification of Chief Financial Officer and Director) (filed herewith).

101.INS

  

XBRL Instance Document.

101.SCH

  

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document.

101.CAL

  

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document.

101.LAB

  

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document.

101.PRE

  

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document.

101.DEF

  

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document.

 

3438


SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

CERES TACTICAL COMMODITY L.P.

 

CERES TACTICAL COMMODITY L.P.

By:

 

Ceres Managed Futures LLC

(General Partner)

By:

 

/s/ Patrick T. Egan

 

Patrick T. Egan

President and Director

Date:

November 13, 2017   August 8, 2019

By:

/s/ Steven Ross
 

/s/ Steven Ross

 

Steven Ross

Chief Financial Officer and Director

(Principal Accounting Officer)

Date:

November 13, 2017   August 8, 2019

The General Partner which signed the above is the only party authorized to act for the registrant. The registrant has no principal executive officer, principal financial officer, controller, or principal accounting officer and has no Board of Directors.

 

3539