Table of Contents
UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM
10-Q

QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2018

2022

OR

TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Commission file number
001-16174

TEVA PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES LIMITED

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Israel
 
Not ApplicableApplicable
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
 
(IRS Employer
Identification Number)
5 Basel Street, Petach Tikva,
124 Dvora HaNevi’a St., Tel Aviv, ISRAEL
 4951033
6944020
(Address of principal executive offices)
 
(Zip code)

+972(3) 914-8171

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

+972
(3)
 914-8213
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title of each class
Trading
Symbol(s)
Name of each exchange
on which registered
American Depositary Shares, each representing one Ordinary Share
TEVA
New York Stock Exchange
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  ☒    No  ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation
S-T
232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).    Yes  ☒    No  ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a
non-accelerated
filer, smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule
12b-2
of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer   Accelerated filer 
Non-accelerated
filer
   (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)  Smaller reporting company 
Emerging growth company    

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act.  ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule
12b-2
of the Act).    Yes  ☐    No  ☒

As of April 30, 2018,March 31, 2022, the registrant had 1,018,226,8031,110,352,397 ordinary shares outstanding.


TEVA PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES LIMITED

Table of Contents

Table of Contents
TEVA PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES LIMITED

INTRODUCTION AND USE OF CERTAIN TERMS

Unless otherwise indicated, all references to the “Company,” “we,” “our” and “Teva” refer to Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Limited and its subsidiaries, and references to “revenues” refer to net revenues. References to “U.S. dollars,” “dollars,” “U.S. $” and “$” are to the lawful currency of the United States of America, and references to “NIS” are to new Israeli shekels. References to “ADS(s)” are to Teva’s American Depositary Share(s). References to “MS” are to multiple sclerosis. Market data, including both sales and share data, is based on information provided by IQVIA, (formerly IMS Health Inc.), a provider of market research to the pharmaceutical industry (“IQVIA”), unless otherwise stated. References to “Actavis Generics” are to the generic pharmaceuticals business we purchased from Allergan plc (“Allergan”) on August 2, 2016. References to “P&G” are to The Procter & Gamble Company, and references to “PGT” are to PGT Healthcare, the joint venture we formed with P&G. References to “R&D” are to Research and Development, references to “IPR&D” are to
in-process
R&D, references to “S&M” are to Selling and Marketing and references to “G&A” are to General and Administrative.

Some amounts in this report may not add up due to rounding. All percentages have been calculated using unrounded amounts. This report on Form

10-Q
contains many of the trademarks and trade names used by Teva in the United States and internationally to distinguish its products and services. Any third-party trademarks mentioned in this report are the property of their respective owners.
CAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

In addition to historical information, this Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q,
and the reports and documents incorporated by reference in this Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q,
may contain forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, which are based on management’s current beliefs and expectations and are subject to substantial risks and uncertainties, both known and unknown, that could cause our future results, performance or achievements to differ significantly from that expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. You can identify these forward-looking statements by the use of words such as “should,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “estimate,” “target,” “may,” “project,” “guidance,” “intend,” “plan,” “believe” and other words and terms of similar meaning and expression in connection with any discussion of future operating or financial performance. Important factors that could cause or contribute to such differences include risks relating to:

our ability to successfully compete in the marketplace, including: that we are substantially dependent on our generic products; competition for our specialty products, especially COPAXONE®, our leading medicine, which faces competition from existing and potential additional generic versions and orally-administered alternatives; competition from companies with greater resources and capabilities; efforts of pharmaceutical companies to limit the use of generics, including through legislation and regulations; consolidation of our customer base and commercial alliances among our customers; the increase in the number of competitors targeting generic opportunities and seeking U.S. market exclusivity for generic versions of significant products; price erosion relating to our products, both from competing products and increased regulation; delays in launches of new products and our ability to achieve expected results from investments in our product pipeline; our ability to take advantage of high-value opportunities; the difficulty and expense of obtaining licenses to proprietary technologies; and the effectiveness of our patents and other measures to protect our intellectual property rights;

our ability to successfully compete in the marketplace, including: that we are substantially increaseddependent on our generic products; consolidation of our customer base and commercial alliances among our customers; delays in launches of new generic products; the increase in the number of competitors targeting generic opportunities and seeking U.S. market exclusivity for generic versions of significant products; our ability to develop and commercialize biopharmaceutical products; competition for our specialty products, including AUSTEDO
®
, AJOVY
®
and COPAXONE
®
; our ability to achieve expected results from investments in our product pipeline; our ability to develop and commercialize additional pharmaceutical products; and the effectiveness of our patents and other measures to protect our intellectual property rights;
our substantial indebtedness, and significantly decreased cash on hand, which may limit our ability to incur additional indebtedness, engage in additional transactions or make new investments, may result in a further downgrade of our credit ratings; and our inability to raise debt or borrow funds in amounts or on terms that are favorable to us;

our business and operations in general, including: failure to effectively execute our restructuring plan announced in December 2017; uncertainties related to,uncertainty regarding the
COVID-19
pandemic and failure to achieve, the potential benefitsgovernmental and success of our new senior management team and organizational structure; harm to our pipeline of future products due to the ongoing review of our R&D programs;societal responses thereto; our ability to developsuccessfully execute and commercialize additional pharmaceutical products; potential additional adverse consequences following our resolution withmaintain the U.S. governmentactivities and efforts related to the measures we have taken or may take in response to the
COVID-19
pandemic and associated costs therewith; effectiveness of our FCPA investigation; compliance with sanctionsoptimization efforts; our ability to attract, hire and other trade control laws;retain highly skilled personnel; manufacturing or quality control problems, which may damage our reputation for quality production and require costly remediation;problems; interruptions in our supply chain; disruptions of our or third party information technology systems orsystems; breaches of our data security; the failure to recruit or retain key personnel; variations in intellectual property laws that may adversely affect our ability to manufacture our products;laws; challenges associated with conducting business globally, including adverse effects of political or economic instability, major hostilities or terrorism; costs and delays resulting from the extensive pharmaceutical regulation to which we are subject or delays in governmental processing time due to travel and work restrictions caused by the
COVID-19
pandemic; the effects of reforms in healthcare regulation and reductions in pharmaceutical pricing, reimbursement and coverage; significant sales to a limited number of customers in our U.S. market;customers; our ability to successfully bid for suitable acquisition targets or licensing opportunities, or to consummate and integrate acquisitions; and our prospects and opportunities for growth if we sell assets;

compliance, regulatory and litigation matters, including: costsfailure to comply with complex legal and delays resultingregulatory environments; increased legal and regulatory action in connection with public concern over the abuse of opioid medications and our ability to reach a final resolution of the remaining opioid-related litigation; scrutiny from competition and pricing authorities around the extensive governmental regulationworld, including our ability to which we are subject;successfully defend against the effectsU.S. Department of reforms in healthcare regulation and reductions in pharmaceutical pricing, reimbursement and coverage; governmental investigations into S&M practices;Justice (“DOJ”) criminal charges of Sherman Act violations; potential liability for patent infringement; product liability claims; increased government scrutiny of our patent settlement agreements; failure to comply with complex Medicare and Medicaid reporting and payment obligations; compliance with anti-corruption sanctions and trade control laws; environmental risks; and the impact of Environmental, Social and Governance (“ESG”) issues;

TEVA PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES LIMITED

other financial and economic risks, including: our exposure to currency fluctuations and restrictions as well as credit risks; potential impairments of our intangible assets; potential significant increases in tax liabilities;liabilities (including as a result of potential tax reform in the United States); and the effect on our overall effective tax rate of the termination or expiration of governmental programs or tax benefits, or of a change in our business;

3

Table of Contents
TEVA PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES LIMITED
and other factors discussed in Item 1A tothis Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q
and in our Annual Report on Form
10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2017.2021, including in the sections captioned “Risk Factors.” Forward-looking statements speak only as of the date on which they are made, and we assume no obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements or other information contained herein, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. You are cautioned not to put undue reliance on these forward-looking statements.

4

PART I — FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1.
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

TEVA PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES LIMITED

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(U.S. dollars in millions)

millions, except for share data)

(Unaudited)

   March 31,
2018
  December 31,
2017
 

ASSETS

   

Current assets:

   

Cash and cash equivalents

  $1,418  $963 

Trade receivables

   6,289   7,128 

Inventories

   5,113   4,924 

Prepaid expenses

   1,138   1,100 

Other current assets

   712   701 

Assets held for sale

   17   566 
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total current assets

   14,687   15,382 

Deferred income taxes

   463   574 

Othernon-current assets

   832   932 

Property, plant and equipment, net

   7,420   7,673 

Identifiable intangible assets, net

   17,314   17,640 

Goodwill

   28,465   28,414 
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total assets

  $69,181  $70,615 
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

LIABILITIES AND EQUITY

   

Current liabilities:

   

Short-term debt

  $1,302  $3,646 

Sales reserves and allowances

   7,410   7,881 

Trade payables

   1,929   2,069 

Employee-related obligations

   607   549 

Accrued expenses

   2,632   3,014 

Other current liabilities

   876   724 

Liabilities held for sale

   —     38 
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total current liabilities

   14,756   17,921 

Long-term liabilities:

   

Deferred income taxes

   2,998   3,277 

Other taxes and long-term liabilities

   1,875   1,843 

Senior notes and loans

   29,450   28,829 
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total long-term liabilities

   34,323   33,949 
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Commitments and contingencies, see note 16

   

Total liabilities

   49,079   51,870 
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Equity:

   

Teva shareholders’ equity:

   

Preferred shares of NIS 0.10 par value per mandatory convertible preferred share; March 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017: authorized 5.0 million shares; issued 3.7 million shares

   3,696   3,631 

Ordinary shares of NIS 0.10 par value per share; March 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017: authorized 2,495 million shares; issued 1,124 million shares

   54   54 

Additionalpaid-in capital

   23,443   23,479 

Retained earnings

   (2,688  (3,808

Accumulated other comprehensive loss

   (1,735  (1,848

Treasury shares as of March 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017 —106 million ordinary shares and 107 million ordinary shares, respectively

   (4,149  (4,149
  

 

 

  

 

 

 
   18,621   17,359 
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Non-controlling interests

   1,481   1,386 
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total equity

   20,102   18,745 
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total liabilities and equity

  $69,181  $70,615 
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

   
March 31,
  
December 31,
 
   
2022
  
2021
 
ASSETS
         
Current assets:
         
Cash and cash equivalents
  $2,175  $2,165 
Accounts receivables, net of allowance for credit losses of $91 million and $90 million as of March 31, 2022 and December 31, 2021
   4,253   4,529 
Inventories
   4,012   3,818 
Prepaid expenses
   1,064   1,075 
Other current assets
   933   965 
Assets held for sale
   13   19 
   
 
 
  
 
 
 
Total current assets
   12,451   12,573 
Deferred income taxes
   637   596 
Other
non-current
assets
   472   515 
Property, plant and equipment, net
   5,932   5,982 
Operating lease
right-of-use
assets
   464   495 
Identifiable intangible assets, net
   7,116   7,466 
Goodwill
   19,986   20,040 
   
 
 
  
 
 
 
Total assets
  $47,059  $47,666 
   
 
 
  
 
 
 
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
         
Current liabilities:
         
Short-term debt
  $2,077  $1,426 
Sales reserves and allowances
   3,807   4,241 
Accounts payables
   1,750   1,686 
Employee-related obligations
   481   563 
Accrued expenses
   2,597   2,208 
Other current liabilities
   900   903 
   
 
 
  
 
 
 
Total current liabilities
   11,613   11,027 
Long-term liabilities:
         
Deferred income taxes
   666   784 
Other taxes and long-term liabilities
   3,288   2,578 
Senior notes and loans
   20,840   21,617 
Operating lease liabilities
   393   416 
   
 
 
  
 
 
 
Total long-term liabilities
   25,186   25,395 
   
 
 
  
 
 
 
Commitments and contingencies
, see note 10
  0
  0  
Total liabilities
   36,799   36,422 
   
 
 
  
 
 
 
Equity:
         
Teva shareholders’ equity:
         
Ordinary shares of NIS 0.10 par value per share; March 31, 2022 and December 31, 2021: authorized 2,495 million shares; issued 1,216 million shares and 1,209 million shares, respectively.
   57   57 
Additional
paid-in
capital
   27,587   27,561 
Accumulated deficit
   (11,484  (10,529
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
   (2,687  (2,683
Treasury shares as of March 31, 2022 and December 31, 2021: 
106 million ordinary shares
   (4,128)  (4,128
   
 
 
  
 
 
 
    9,344   10,278 
   
 
 
  
 
 
 
Non-controlling
interests
   916   966 
   
 
 
  
 
 
 
Total equity
   10,260   11,244 
   
 
 
  
 
 
 
Total liabilities and equity
  $47,059  $47,666 
   
 
 
  
 
 
 
Amounts may not add up due to rounding.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.

5

TEVA PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES LIMITED

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME

(LOSS)

(U.S. dollars in millions, except share and per share data)

(Unaudited)

   Three months ended
March 31,
 
   2018  2017 

Net revenues

  $5,065  $5,650 

Cost of sales

   2,717   2,811 
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Gross profit

   2,348   2,839 

Research and development expenses

   317   432 

Selling and marketing expenses

   771   958 

General and administrative expenses

   329   366 

Other asset Impairments, restructuring and other items

   707   240 

Goodwill impairment

   180   —   

Legal settlements and loss contingencies

   (1,278  20 

Other income

   (203  (72
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Operating income

   1,525   895 

Financial expenses, net

   271   207 
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Income before income taxes

   1,254   688 

Income taxes

   46   54 

Share in (profits) losses of associated companies, net

   74   (7
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net income

   1,134   641 

Net Income (loss) attributable tonon-controlling interests

   14   (4
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net income attributable to Teva

   1,120   645 
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Dividends on preferred shares

   65   65 
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net income attributable to ordinary shareholders

  $1,055  $580 
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Earnings per share attributable to ordinary shareholders:

   

Basic

  $1.04  $0.57 
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Diluted

  $1.03  $0.57 
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Weighted average number of shares (in millions):

   

Basic

   1,017   1,016 
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Diluted

   1,020   1,017 
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

   
Three months ended
 
   
March 31,
 
   
2022
  
2021
 
Net revenues
  $3,661  $3,982 
Cost of sales
   1,921   2,104 
   
 
 
  
 
 
 
Gross profit
   1,740   1,878 
Research and development expenses
   225   254 
Selling and marketing expenses
   584   585 
General and administrative expenses
   296   290 
Intangible assets impairments
   149   79 
Other assets impairments, restructuring and other items
   128   137 
Legal settlements and loss contingencies
   1,124   104 
Other income
   (52  (5
   
 
 
  
 
 
 
Operating income (loss)
   (713)  434 
Financial expenses, net
   258   290 
   
 
 
  
 
 
 
Income (loss) before income taxes
   (971)  144 
Income taxes (benefit)
   2  62 
Share in (profits) losses of associated companies, net
   (21  (3
   
 
 
  
 
 
 
Net income (loss)
   (952)  84 
Net income (loss) attributable to
non-controlling
interests
   3   7 
   
 
 
  
 
 
 
Net income (loss) attributable to Teva
   (955)  77 
   
 
 
  
 
 
 
Earnings (loss) per share attributable to ordinary shareholders:
         
Basic
  $(0.86) $0.07 
   
 
 
  
 
 
 
Diluted
  $(0.86) $0.07 
   
 
 
  
 
 
 
Weighted average number of shares (in millions):
         
Basic
   1,107   1,099 
   
 
 
  
 
 
 
Diluted
   1,107   1,107 
   
 
 
  
 
 
 
Amounts may not add up due to rounding.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.

6

TEVA PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES LIMITED

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

(LOSS)

(U.S. dollars in millions)

(Unaudited)

   Three months ended
March 31,
 
   2018  2017 

Net income

  $1,134  $641 

Other comprehensive income, net of tax:

   

Currency translation adjustment

   239   466 

Unrealized gain (loss) from derivative financial instruments, net

   (44  8 

Unrealized gain fromavailable-for-sale securities, net

   1   54 

Unrealized loss on defined benefit plans

   —     (13
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total other comprehensive income

   196   515 
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total comprehensive income

   1,330   1,156 

Comprehensive income attributable tonon-controlling interests

   97   66 
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Comprehensive income attributable to Teva

  $1,233  $1,090 
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

   
Three months ended
 
   
March 31,
 
   
2022
  
2021
 
Net income (loss)
  $(952) $84 
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax:
         
Currency translation adjustment
   (64  (208
Unrealized gain (loss) from derivative financial instruments, net
   7   7 
   
 
 
  
 
 
 
Total other comprehensive income (loss)
   (57  (201
   
 
 
  
 
 
 
Total comprehensive income (loss)
   (1,009)  (117
Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to
non-controlling
interests
   (50  (60
   
 
 
  
 
 
 
Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to Teva
  $(959) $(57
   
 
 
  
 
 
 
Amounts may not add up due to rounding.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.

7

TEVA PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES LIMITED

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(U.S. dollars in millions)

(Unaudited)

   Three months ended
March 31,
 
   2018  2017 

Operating activities:

   

Net income

  $1,134  $641 

Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operations:

   

Net change in operating assets and liabilities

   (592  (797

Impairment of long-lived assets

   432   11 

Depreciation and amortization

   507   480 

Goodwill impairment

   180   —   

Deferred income taxes – net and uncertain tax positions

   (221  (217

Net gain from sale of long-lived assets and investments

   (106  (39

Impairment of equity investment

   94   —   

Research and development in process

   54   —   

Stock-based compensation

   30   40 

Other items

   (16  17 
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net cash provided by operating activities

   1,496   136 
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Investing activities:

   

Proceeds from sales of business, investments and long-lived assets

   824   1,412 

Beneficial interest collected in exchanged for securitized trade receivables

   444   334 

Purchases of property, plant and equipment

   (163  (202

Purchases of investments and other assets

   (56  (6

Other investing activities

   (10  (22
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net cash provided by investing activities

   1,039   1,516 
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Financing activities:

   

Repayment of long-term loans and other long-term liabilities

   (6,243  —   

Proceeds from long-term loans, net of issuance costs

   4,440   —   

Net change in short-term debt

   (261  (1,350

Dividends paid on ordinary shares

   (12  (346

Dividends paid on preferred shares

   (10  (65

Other financing activities

   (5  (7
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net cash used in financing activities

   (2,091  (1,768
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Translation adjustment on cash and cash equivalents

   11   28 
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net change in cash and cash equivalents

   455   (88

Balance of cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period

   963   988 
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Balance of cash and cash equivalents at end of period

  $1,418  $900 
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Supplemental cash flow information:

   

Non-cash financing and investing activities:

   

Beneficial interest obtained in exchange for securitized trade receivables

  $551  $285 

CHANGES IN EQUITY

  
Teva shareholders’ equity
       
  
Ordinary shares
                      
  
Number of
shares (in
millions)
  
Stated
value
  
Additional
paid-in

capital
  
Retained
earnings
(accumulated
deficit)
  
Accumulated other
comprehensive
(loss)
  
Treasury
shares
  
Total Teva
shareholders’
equity
  
Non-controlling

interests
  
Total
equity
 
  
(U.S. dollars in millions)
 
Balance at December 31, 2021
  1,209   57   27,561   (10,529  (2,683  (4,128  10,278   966   11,244 
Net Income (loss)
              (955)          (955)  3   (952)
Other comprehensive
 
income
(loss)
                  (4      (4  (53  (57
Issuance of Shares
  7   *   1               
1
       1 
Stock-based compensation
expense
          24               24       24 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
 
Balance at March 31, 2022
  1,216  $57  $27,587  $(11,484 $(2,687 $(4,128 $9,344  $916  $10,260 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
 
*
Represents an amount less than $0.5 million.
  
Teva shareholders’ equity
       
  
Ordinary shares
                      
  
Number of
shares (in
millions)
  
Stated
value
  
Additional
paid-in

capital
  
Retained
earnings
(accumulated
deficit)
  
Accumulated other
comprehensive
(loss)
  
Treasury
shares
  
Total Teva
shareholders’
equity
  
Non-controlling

interests
  
Total
equity
 
  
(U.S. dollars in millions)
 
Balance at December 31, 2020
  1,202   57   27,443   (10,946  (2,399  (4,128  10,026   1,035   11,061 
Net Income (loss)
              77           77   7   84 
Other comprehensive income (loss)
                  (134      (134  (67  (201
Issuance of shares
  6   *                           * 
Stock-based compensation expense
          31               31       31 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
 
Balance at March 31, 2021
  1,208  $57  $27,474  $(10,869 $(2,534 $(4,128 $10,000  $975  $10,975 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
 
*
Represents an amount less than $0.5 million.
Amounts may not add up due to rounding.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.

8

TEVA PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES LIMITED

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(U.S. dollars in millions)
(Unaudited)
   
Three months ended
 
   
March 31,
 
   
2022
  
2021
 
Operating activities:
   
Net income (loss)
  $(952) $84 
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by operations:
         
Depreciation and amortization
   323   376 
Impairment of long-lived assets and assets held for sale
   165   127 
Net change in operating assets and liabilities
   559   (1,076
Deferred income taxes – net and uncertain tax positions
   (175  (11
Stock-based compensation
   24   31 
Other items
   30   (10
Net loss (gain) from investments and from sale of long lived assets
   (23  74 
   
 
 
  
 
 
 
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities
   (49)  (405
   
 
 
  
 
 
 
Investing activities:
         
   
Beneficial interest collected in exchange for securitized trade receivables
   305   476 
Proceeds from sale of business and long lived assets
   25   138 
Acquisition of businesses, net of cash acquired
  
 
(7
 
 
0  
 
   
Purchases of property, plant and equipment 
   (157  (150
Purchases of investments and other assets .
   (4  (2)
Proceeds from sale of investments
   0     46 
Other investing activities
  
 
(1
 
 
0
 
   
 
 
  
 
 
 
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities
   161   508 
   
 
 
  
 
 
 
Financing activities:
         
Redemption of convertible senior notes
   0     (491
Other financing activities
   2   (2
   
 
 
  
 
 
 
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
   2   (493
   
 
 
  
 
 
 
Translation adjustment on cash and cash equivalents
   (62  (44
   
 
 
  
 
 
 
Net change in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash
   52   (434
Balance of cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash at beginning of period
   2,198   2,177 
   
 
 
  
 
 
 
Balance of cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash at
en
d
of period
  $2,250  $1,743 
   
 
 
  
 
 
 
Reconciliation of cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash reported in the consolidated balance sheets:
         
Cash and cash equivalents
   2,175   1,743 
Restricted cash included in other current assets 
   75   0   
   
 
 
  
 
 
 
Total cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash shown in the statement of cash flows
   2,250   1,743 
   
 
 
  
 
 
 
Non-cash
financing and investing activities:
         
Beneficial interest obtained in exchange for securitized accounts receivables  $299  $488 
Amounts may not add up due to rounding
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.
9

TEVA PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES LIMITED
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

Note 1 – Basis of presentation:

a.
Basis of presentation
The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared on the same basis as the annual consolidated financial statements. In the opinion of management, the financial statements reflect all normal and recurring adjustments necessary to fairly state the financial position and results of operations of Teva. The information included in this Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q
should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form
10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2017,2021, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). AmountsThe
year-end
balance sheet data was derived from the audited consolidated financial statements as of December 31, 2017 were derived from the audited balance sheet at that date,2021, but not all disclosures required by generally accepted accounting principles in the United States (“U.S. GAAP”) are included. Certain comparative figures have been reclassified
In the process of preparing the consolidated financial statements, management makes estimates, judgments and assumptions that may affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, equity, revenues and expenses and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. The inputs into Teva’s judgments and estimates also consider the economic implications of the
COVID-19
pandemic on its critical and significant accounting estimates, most significantly in relation to conformsales, reserves and allowances, IPR&D assets, marketed product rights and goodwill, all of which will depend on future developments that are highly uncertain, including as a result of new information that may emerge concerning the
COVID-19
pandemic and the actions taken to current presentation. contain or treat it, as well as the economic impact on Teva’s employees, third-party manufacturers and suppliers, customers and markets. All estimates made by Teva related to the impact of the
COVID-19
pandemic within its financial statements may change in future periods. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
In February 2022, Russia launched an invasion of Ukraine. As of the date of this Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q,
sustained conflict and disruption in the region is ongoing. Russia and Ukraine markets are included in Teva’s International Markets segment results. Teva has no manufacturing or R&D facilities in these markets. During the first quarter of 2022, the impact of this conflict on Teva’s results of operations and financial condition was immaterial.
The results of operations for the three months ended March 31, 20182022 are not necessarily indicative of results that could be expected for the entire fiscal year.

Note 2 - Significant accounting policies:

Certain amounts in the consolidated financial statements and associated notes may not add up due to rounding. All percentages have been calculated using unrounded amounts.

b.
Significant accounting policies
Recently adopted accounting pronouncements

On January 1, 2018, Teva

In August 2020, the FASB issued ASU
2020-06
“Debt – Debt with Conversion and Other Options (Subtopic
470-20)
and Derivatives and Hedging – Contracts in Entity’s Own Equity (Subtopic 815 – 40).” This guidance simplifies the accounting for certain financial instruments with characteristics of liabilities and equity, including convertible instruments and contracts on an entity’s own equity. The amendments to this guidance are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2021, and interim periods within those fiscal years. The adoption of this guidance did not have a significant impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
In March 2020, the FASB issued ASU
2020-04
“Reference Rate Reform (Topic 848)—Facilitation of the Effects of Reference Rate Reform on Financial Reporting.” This guidance provides optional expedients and exceptions for applying generally accepted accounting principles to contracts, hedging relationships, and other transactions affected by reference rate reform if certain criteria are met. The guidance applies only to contracts, hedging relationships, and other transactions that reference LIBOR or another reference rate expected to be discontinued because of reference rate reform. This guidance is effective for all entities as of March 12, 2020 through December 31, 2022. There was no material impact to the Company’s consolidated financial statements for the period ended March 31, 2022 as a result of adopting this standard update. The Company has completed negotiations to transform the facility base rate of its securitization program and is continuing to evaluate the potential impact of the replacement of the LIBOR benchmark on its interest rate risk management activities. However, it is not expected to have a material impact on the consolidated financial results of operations, financial position or cash flows.
Recently issued accounting pronouncements, not yet adopted
In November 2021, the newFASB issued ASU
2021-10
“Government Assistance (Topic 832)”, which requires annual disclosures that increase the transparency of transactions involving government grants, including (1) the types of
10

TEVA PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES LIMITED
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
transactions, (2) the accounting standardfor those transactions, and (3) the effect of those transactions on an entity’s financial statements. The amendments in this update are effective for financial statements issued for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2021. The Company is currently evaluating this guidance to determine the impact it may have on its consolidated financial statements.
In October 2021, the FASB issued ASU
2021-08
“Business Combinations (Topic 805), Accounting for Contract Assets and Contract Liabilities from Contracts with Customers”, which requires contract assets and contract liabilities acquired in a business combination to be recognized and measured by the acquirer on the acquisition date in accordance with ASC 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers, and all the related amendments (“new revenue standard”) to all contracts using the modified retrospective method. The cumulative effect of initially applying the new revenue standard was immaterial. See note 9 for further discussion.

In May 2017, the FASB issued guidance on changes to terms and conditions of share-based payment awards. The amendment provides guidance about which changes to terms or conditions of a share-based payment award require an entity to apply modification accounting.Customers. The guidance is effective for the fiscal year beginning on January 1, 2018, including interim periods within that year. Teva adopted the provisions of this updatewill result in the first quarter of 2018.acquirer recognizing contract assets and contract liabilities at the same amounts recorded by the acquiree. The impact that this new standard has on Teva’s financial statements after adoption will depend on any future modification of share-based compensation.

In February 2017, the FASB issued guidance onde-recognition of nonfinancial assets. The amendments address the recognition of gains and losses on the transfer (i.e., sale) of nonfinancial assets to counterparties other than customers. The guidance conformsde-recognition on nonfinancial assets with the model for transactions in the new revenue standard. Teva adopted the provisions of this update in the first quarter of 2018 with no material impact on its consolidated financial statements.

In August 2016, the FASB issued guidance on statements of cash flows. The guidance addresses eight specific issues: debt prepayment or debt extinguishment costs; settlement of certain debt instruments; contingent consideration payments made after a business combination; proceeds from the settlement of insurance claims; proceeds from the settlement of corporate-owned life insurance policies; distributions received from equity method investees; beneficial interest in securitization transactions; and separately identifiable cash flows and application of predominance principle. The amendments should be applied retrospectively. Teva adoptedprospectively to acquisitions occurring on or after the provisions of this update in the first quarter of 2018. This resulted in a reclassification of $444 million and $334 million from operating activities to investing activities in the first quarter of 2018 and 2017, respectively.

In January 2016, the FASB issued guidance which updates certain aspects of recognition, measurement, presentation and disclosure of equity investments. The guidance requires entities to recognize changes in fair value in net income rather than in accumulated other comprehensive income. Teva adopted the provisions of this update in the first quarter of 2018. Following the adoption, the Company recorded a $5 million opening balance reclassification from accumulated other comprehensive loss to retained earnings. See note 10.

Recently issued accounting pronouncements, not yet adopted

In February 2018, the FASB issued guidance on the recognition and measurement of financial assets and financial liabilities. The guidance provides updates which address certain aspects of recognition, measurement, presentation and disclosure of financial instruments.effective date. The guidance is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017; however, public business entities with fiscal years beginning between December 15, 2017, and June 15, 2018 are not required to adopt these amendments until the interim period beginning after June 15, 2018. Teva is currently evaluating the potential effect of the guidance on its consolidated financial statements.

TEVA PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES LIMITED

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

In February 2018, the FASB issued guidance on the reclassification of certain tax effects from accumulated other comprehensive income. The guidance allows reclassification of stranded tax effects resulting from the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act from accumulated other comprehensive income to retained earnings. This guidance is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, with early adoption permitted. Teva is currently evaluating the potential effect of the guidance on its consolidated financial statements.

In August 2017, the FASB issued guidance on derivatives and hedging, which expands and refines hedge accounting for bothnon-financial and financial risk components and aligns the recognition and presentation of the effects of the hedging instrument and the hedged item in the financial statements. The guidance will be effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018,2022, including interim periods within those fiscal years (earlyyears. Early adoption is permitted, including in interim periods, for any interim and annual financial statements that have not yet been issued). Tevaissued. The Company is currently evaluating this guidance to determine the potential effect of the guidanceimpact it may have on its consolidated financial statements.

In June 2016, the FASB issued guidance on financial instruments. The guidance replaces the current incurred loss impairment methodology with a methodology that reflects expected credit losses and requires consideration of a broader range of reasonable and supportable information to inform credit loss estimates. The guidance will be effective for the fiscal year beginning on January 1, 2020, including interim periods within that year. Teva is currently evaluating the potential effect of the guidance on its consolidated financial statements.

In February 2016, the FASB issued guidance on leases. The guidance requires entities to record lease assets and lease liabilities on the balance sheet and disclose key information about leasing arrangements. In September 2017, the FASB issued additional amendments providing clarification and implementation guidance. The guidance will become effective for interim and annual periods beginning on January 1, 2019 (early adoption is permitted) and is required to be adopted at the earliest period presented using a modified retrospective approach. In January 2018, the FASB issued an update that permits an entity to elect an optional transition practical expedient to not evaluate land easements that existed or expired before the entity’s adoption of the new standard and that were not previously accounted for as leases. Although the Company has not finalized its process of evaluating the impact of adoption of the ASU on its consolidated financial statements, the Company expects there will be a material increase to assets and liabilities related to the recognition of newright-of-use assets and lease liabilities on the Company’s balance sheet for leases currently classified as operating leases.

TEVA PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES LIMITED

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(Unaudited)


NOTE 32 – Certain transactions:

Business acquisitions:

Actavis Generics and Anda acquisitions

On August 2, 2016, Teva consummated its acquisition of Allergan plc’s (“Allergan”) worldwide generic pharmaceuticals business (“Actavis Generics”). At closing, Teva transferred to Allergan consideration of approximately $33.4 billion in cash and approximately 100.3 million Teva shares.

On October 3, 2016, Teva consummated the acquisition of Anda Inc. (“Anda”), the fourth largest distributor of generic pharmaceuticals in the United States, from Allergan, for cash consideration of $500 million. The purchase is a transaction related to the Actavis Generics acquisition and as such the purchase price accounting and related disclosures were treated on a combined basis.

The final cash consideration for the Actavis Generics acquisition was subject to certain net working capital adjustments. Following the terms of the agreement, Teva submitted an adjustment for $1.4 billion with regards to a working capital true up as well as potential recoveries of purchase price related to certain tax items. On January 31, 2018, Teva and Allergan entered into a settlement agreement and mutual releases, providing that Allergan will make aone-time payment of $703 million to Teva, which was paid during the first quarter of 2018. The Agreement also provides that Teva and Allergan will jointly dismiss the working capital dispute arbitration, as well as actual or potential claims under the Master Purchase Agreement, dated July 26, 2015, by and between Teva and Allergan, for breach of any representation, warranty or covenant (other than any breach of a post-closing covenant not known as of the date of the settlement agreement). As the measurement period has ended, this amount has been recorded as a gain under legal settlements and loss contingencies.

Rimsa

On March 3, 2016, Teva completed the acquisition of Representaciones e Investigaciones Médicas, S.A. de C.V. (“Rimsa”), a pharmaceutical manufacturing and distribution company in Mexico, for $2.3 billion, in a cash free, debt free set of transactions. Teva financed the transaction using cash on hand.

Following the closing of the acquisition, Teva identified issues concerning Rimsa’spre-acquisition quality, manufacturing and other practices, at which point Teva began an assessment of the extent and cost of remediation required to return its products to the market. In September 2016, two lawsuits were filed: apre-emptive suit by the Rimsa sellers against Teva and Teva’s lawsuit alleging fraud and breach of contract against the Rimsa sellers. The Rimsa sellers subsequently dismissed their lawsuit and the dismissal was approved by court order on December 20, 2016.

On February 15, 2018, Teva and the Rimsa sellers entered into a settlement agreement and mutual releases on the breach of contract claim, providing that the sellers will make aone-time payment to Teva, which was paid during the first quarter of 2018 and recorded as a gain under legal settlements and loss contingencies. This settlement was approved by the court and Teva’s breach of contract claim was subsequently dismissed.

TEVA PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES LIMITED

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

Assets and Liabilities Held For Sale:

Certain Women’s Health and Other Specialty Products

On September 17, 2017, Teva entered into a definitive agreement under which CVC Capital Partners Fund VI will acquire a portfolio of products for $703 million in cash. The portfolio of products, which is marketed and sold outside of the United States, includes the women’s health products OVALEAP®, ZOELY®, SEASONIQUE®, COLPOTROPHINE® and other specialty products such as ACTONEL®.

As of December 31, 2017, the Company accounted for this transaction as assets and liabilities held for sale and determined that the fair value less cost to sell exceeded the carrying value of the business. The Company disposed of $329 million of goodwill associated with the divested business.

On January 31, 2018, Teva completed the sale of the portfolio of products to CVC Capital Partners Fund VI. As a result of these transactions, the Company recognized a net gain on sale of approximately $93 million in the first quarter of 2018 within other income in the consolidated statement of income. The transaction expenses for these divestitures of approximately $2 million were recognized concurrently and included as a reduction to the net gain on sale.

The Company determined that the sale of its global women’s health business did not constitute a strategic shift and that it did not, and will not, have a major effect on its operations and financial results. Accordingly, the operations associated with the transactions are not reported as discontinued operations.

The table below summarizes the major classes of assets and liabilities included as held for sale as of March 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017:

   March 31, 2018   December 31, 2017 
   (U.S. $ in millions) 

Inventories

   —      39 

Property, plant and equipment, net

   17    16 

Identifiable intangible assets, net

   —      236 

Goodwill

   —      275 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total assets of the disposal group classified as held for sale in the consolidated balance sheets

  $17   $566 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Other taxes and long-term liabilities

   —      38 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total liabilities of the disposal group classified as held for sale in the consolidated balance sheets

  $—     $38 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Other significant agreements:

The Company has entered into alliances and other arrangements with third parties to acquire rights to products it does not have, to access markets it does not operate in and to otherwise share development costs or business risks. The Company’s most significant agreements of this nature are summarized below.

PGT Healthcare Partnership

MODAG
In AprilOctober 2021, Teva announced a license agreement with MODAG GmbH (“Modag”) that will provide Teva an exclusive global license to develop, manufacture and commercialize Modag’s lead compound
(TEV-56286)
and a related compound
(TEV-56287).
TEV-56286
was initially developed for the treatment of Multiple System Atrophy (MSA) and Parkinson’s disease, and has the potential to be applied to other treatments for neurodegenerative disorders, such as Alzheimer’s disease. A phase 1b clinical trial is currently being completed for
TEV-56286.
In the fourth quarter of 2021, Teva made an upfront payment
of $10 
million to Modag that was recorded as R&D expense. Modag may be eligible for future development milestone payments, totaling an aggregate amount of up to
$70 
million, as well as future commercial milestones and royalties.
Alvotech
In August 2020, Teva entered into an agreement with biopharmaceutical company Alvotech for the exclusive commercialization in the U.S. of five biosimilar product candidates. The initial pipeline for this collaboration contains biosimilar candidates addressing multiple therapeutic areas, including a proposed biosimilar to Humira
®
. Under this agreement, Alvotech is responsible for the development, registration and supply of the biosimilar product candidates and Teva will exclusively commercialize the products in the United States. Teva paid an upfront payment in the third quarter of 2020 and additional upfront and milestone payments in the second quarter of 2021 that were recorded as R&D expenses. Additional development and commercial milestone payments of up to $455 
million, as well as royalty payments, may be payable by Teva over the next few years. Teva and Alvotech will share profit from the commercialization of these biosimilars. In March 2021,
Abbvie sued Alvotech for allegedly misappropriating confidential information relating to Humira
®
. In October 2021, the claim was dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Abbvie has appealed this decision to the U.S. Court of Appeals. In addition, there is pending patent litigation between Abbvie and Alvotech related to Alvotech’s proposed biosimilar to Humira
®
. In December 2021, Abbvie also filed a complaint with the U.S. International Trade Commission (“ITC”) against both Alvotech and Teva seeking to prevent Teva and Alvotech from importing Alvotech’s proposed biosimilar to Humira
®
into the United States. On January 26, 2022, the ITC issued a decision to initiate an investigation into Alvotech’s proposed biosimilar product. On March 8, 2022, Abbvie and Alvotech settled all the above pending IP matters relating to Alvotech’s proposed biosimilar to Humira
®
. Pursuant to that settlement, Alvotech and Teva may sell Alvotech’s proposed biosimilar to Humira
®
in the United States beginning on July 1, 2023, provided that U.S. regulatory approval is obtained by that date. On March 28, 2022, the ITC officially terminated the investigation requested by Abbvie.
Eli Lilly and Alder BioPharmaceuticals
In December 2018, Teva signed a separationentered into an agreement with Eli Lilly & Co. (“Lilly”) resolving the Procter & Gamble Company (“P&G”)European Patent Office opposition they had filed against Teva’s AJOVY
®
patents. The settlement agreement with Lilly also resolved Lilly’s action to terminaterevoke the PGT Healthcare partnership thatpatent protecting AJOVY in the two companies established in 2011 to marketover-the-counter (“OTC”) medicines. Teva will continue to maintain its OTC business on an independent basis.

The separation is planned to become effective July 1, 2018, subject to receiptUnited Kingdom.

11

TEVA PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES LIMITED

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

During the first quarter of 2018, Teva recorded an impairment of $56 million related to the plant in India and an impairment of $94 million related to the investment in New Chapter Inc. which was recorded within share in loss (profits) of associated companies.

Alder BioPharmaceuticals®

On January 8, 2018, Teva signed a global license agreement with Alder BioPharmaceuticals (“Alder”). The agreement validates Teva’s IPintellectual property and resolves Alder’s opposition to Teva’s European patent with respect to anti-calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) antibodies, including the withdrawal of Alder’s appeal before the European Patent Office. Under the terms of the agreement, Alder will receivereceived a
non-exclusive
license to Teva’s anti-CGRP antibodies patent portfolio to develop, manufacture and commercialize eptinezumab in the U.S.United States and worldwide, excluding Japan and Korea.Japan. Teva received a $25 million upfront payment that was recognized as revenue during the first quarter of 2018, whichand a $25 million milestone payment in March 2020 that was recognized as revenue.revenue in the first quarter of 2020. The agreement stipulates additional development and commercial milestone payments to Teva of up to $175$150 million, as well as future royalties.

AUSTEDO®

On September, 19, 2017, Teva entered into a partnership agreement with Nuvelution Pharma, Inc. (“Nuvelution”) for development of AUSTEDO for the treatment of Tourette syndrome in pediatric patients in the United States. Nuvelution will fund and manage clinical development, driving all operational aspects of the phase 3 program, and Teva will lead the regulatory process and be responsible for commercialization. Upon FDA approval of AUSTEDO for the treatment of Tourette syndrome, Teva will pay Nuvelution apre-agreed amount as compensation for their contribution to the partnership.


Otsuka

On May 12, 2017, Teva entered into a license and collaboration agreement with Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd. (“Otsuka”), providing
Otsuka with an exclusive license
to conduct phase 2develop and 3 clinical trials for fremanezumab in Japan and, if approved, to commercialize the productAJOVY in Japan. Otsuka paid Teva an upfront payment of $50 million in consideration for the transaction. In the third quarter of 2020, Otsuka submitted an application to obtain manufacturing and marketing approval for AJOVY in Japan and, as a result, paid Teva a milestone payment of $15 million, which was recognized as revenue in the third quarter of 2020. AJOVY was approved in Japan in June 2021 and launched on August 30, 2021. As a result of the launch, Otsuka paid Teva a milestone payment of $35 
million, which was recognized as revenue in the third quarter of 2021. Teva may receive additional milestone payments upon filing with Japanese regulatory authorities, receipt of regulatory approval and achievement of certain revenue targets. Otsuka will also paypays Teva royalties on fremanezumabAJOVY sales in Japan.

AttenukineTM

In December 2016, Teva entered into a license agreement for research, development, manufacture and commercializing of AttenukineTM with a subsidiary of Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Ltd. (“Takeda”). Teva received a $30 million upfront payment. The agreement stipulates additional milestone payments to Teva of up to $280 million, as well as future royalties.

Ninlaro®

In November 2016, Teva entered into an agreement to sell its royalties and other rights in Ninlaro® (ixazomib) to a subsidiary of Takeda, for a $150 million upfront payment to Teva and an additional $150 million payment based on sales during 2017. Teva was entitled to these royalties pursuant to an agreement from 2014 assigning the Ninlaro® patents to an affiliate of Takeda in consideration of milestone payments and sales royalties. In the first six months of 2017, Teva received payments in the amount of $150 million, which were recognized as revenue for the period.

Celltrion

In October 2016, Teva and Celltrion, Inc. (“Celltrion”) entered into a collaborative agreement to commercialize two of Celltrion’s biosimilar products in development for the U.S. and Canadian markets. Teva paid Celltrion $160 million, of which up to $60 million is refundable or creditable under certain circumstances. Teva and Celltrion will share the profit from the commercialization of these products.

TEVA PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES LIMITED

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

Regeneron

In September 2016, Teva and Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (“Regeneron”) entered into a collaborative agreement to develop and commercialize Regeneron’s pain medication product, fasinumab. Teva and Regeneron share equally in the global commercial rights to this product (excluding Japan, Korea and nine other Asian countries), as well as ongoing associated R&D costs of approximately $1 billion. Teva made an upfront payment of $250 million to Regeneron in the third quarter of 2016 as partand additional payments for achievement of thedevelopment milestones in an aggregate amount of $120 million were paid during 2017 and 2018. The agreement stipulates additional development and additionalcommercial milestone payments of $25up to $2,230 million, as well as future royalties. Currently, all
non-essential
activities and $35related expenditures for fasinumab have been put on hold. Next steps will be assessed together with Regeneron, with the intention of discussing data with the FDA.
MedinCell
In November 2013, Teva entered into an agreement with MedinCell for the development and commercialization of multiple long-acting injectable products. The lead product candidate selected was risperidone LAI
(TV-46000)
suspension for subcutaneous use for the treatment of schizophrenia. In August 2021, the FDA accepted the new drug application (“NDA”) for risperidone LAI, based on phase 3 data from two pivotal studies. Teva leads the clinical development and regulatory process and is responsible for commercialization of this product candidate. MedinCell may be eligible for development milestones, and future commercial milestones of up to $112 million in respect of risperidone LAI. Teva will also pay MedinCell royalties on net sales. In April 2022, the second quarterFDA issued a Complete Response Letter (“CRL”) regarding the NDA for risperidone LAI. Teva is reviewing its next steps based on the CRL and will work closely with
the
FDA to address their recommendations.
Assets and Liabilities Held For Sale:
General
Assets and liabilities held for sale as of 2017March 31, 2022 included certain manufacturing assets that are expected to be sold within the next year. Assets and inliabilities held for sale as of December 31, 2021 included certain manufacturing assets sold during the first quarter of 2018, respectively.

2022, and certain assets that are expected to be sold during 2022. The table below summarizes all Teva assets and liabilities included as held for sale as of March 31, 2022 and December 31, 2021:



12

Table of Contents
TEVA PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES LIMITED
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
  
March 31,
  
December 31,
 
  
2022
  
2021
 
  
(U.S. $ in millions)
 
Inventories
 $0    $2 
Property, plant and equipment, net and others
  64   86 
Goodwill
  0     7 
Adjustments of assets held for sale to fair value
  (51  (76
  
 
 
  
 
 
 
Total assets of the disposal group classified as held for sale in the consolidated balance sheets
 $13  $19 
  
 
 
  
 
 
 
Total liabilities of the disposal group classified as held for sale in the consolidated balance sheets, recorded under accrued expenses and other long-term liabilities
 $(60 $(43
  
 
 
  
 
 
 
NOTE 3 – Revenue from contracts with customers:
Disaggregation of revenue
The following table disaggregates Teva’s revenues by major revenue streams. For additional information on disaggregation of revenues, see note 15.
   
Three months ended March 31, 2022
 
   
North
America
  
Europe
   
International
Markets
   
Other
activities
   
Total
 
   
(U.S. $ in millions)
 
Sale of goods
   1,377   1,134    445    180    3,136 
Licensing arrangements
   21   12    4    1    38 
Distribution
   342  
 
§
    16    0      358 
Other
   (2  9    27    95    129 
   
 
 
  
 
 
   
 
 
   
 
 
   
 
 
 
   $1,737  $1,156   $492   $275   $3,661 
   
 
 
  
 
 
   
 
 
   
 
 
   
 
 
 
§ Represents an amount less than $0.5 million.
   
Three months ended March 31, 2021
 
   
North
America
   
Europe
   
International
Markets
   
Other
activities
   
Total
 
   
(U.S. $ in millions)
 
Sale of goods
   1,668    1,178    440    177    3,463 
Licensing arrangements
   32    14    3    1    49 
Distribution
   289   
 
§
    19    0      308 
Other
  
 
§
    22    28    111    162 
   
 
 
   
 
 
   
 
 
   
 
 
   
 
 
 
   $1,989   $1,214   $490   $289   $3,982 
   
 
 
   
 
 
   
 
 
   
 
 
   
 
 
 
§ Represents an amount less than $0.5 million.
13

Table of Contents
TEVA PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES LIMITED
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
Variable consideration
Variable consideration mainly includes sales reserves and allowances (“SR&A”), comprised of rebates (including Medicaid and other governmental program discounts), chargebacks, returns and other promotional (including shelf stock adjustments) items. Provisions for prompt payment discounts are netted against accounts receivables.
The Company recognizes these provisions at the time of sale and adjusts them if the actual amounts differ from the estimated provisions.
SR&A to U.S. customers comprised approximately 73% of the Company’s total SR&A as of March 31, 2022, with the remaining balance primarily in Canada and Germany. The changes in SR&A for third-party sales for the three months ended March 31, 2022 and 2021 were as follows: 
   
Sales Reserves and Allowances
    
   
Reserves
included in
Accounts
Receivable, net
  
Rebates
  
Medicaid and
other
governmental
allowances
  
Chargebacks
  
Returns
  
Other
  
Total reserves
included in SR&A
  
Total
 
   
(U.S. $ in millions)
 
Balance at December 31, 2021
  $68  $1,655  $854  $1,085  $535  $112  $4,241  $4,309 
Provisions related to sales made in current year
   82   928   198   1,814   58   90   3,088   3,170 
Provisions related to sales made in prior periods
   —     (90  26   (8  (14  (1  (87  (87
Credits and payments
   (88  (1,037  (270  (1,940  (110  (73  (3,430  (3,518
Translation differences
   —     (3  (1  —     —     (1  (5  (5
   
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
 
Balance at March 31, 2022
  $62   1,453  $807  $951  $469  $127  $3,807  $3,869 
   
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
 
   
Reserves
included in
Accounts
Receivable, net
  
Rebates
  
Medicaid and
other
governmental
allowances
  
Chargebacks
  
Returns
  
Other
  
Total reserves
included in SR&A
  
Total
 
   
(U.S.$ in millions)
 
Balance at December 31, 2020
  $80  $2,054  $828  $1,108  $686  $148  $4,824  $4,904 
Provisions related to sales made in current year
   100   1,126   164   2,043   76   23   3,432   3,532 
Provisions related to sales made in prior periods
   —     (55  (11  6   (40  (17  (117  (117
Credits and payments
   (102  (1,210  (188  (1,987  (101  (40  (3,526  (3,628
Translation differences
   —     (17  (4  (3  (3  (2  (29  (29
   
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
 
Balance at March 31, 2021
  $78  $1,898  $789  $1,167  $618  $112  $4,584  $4,662 
   
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
 

14

Table of Contents
TEVA PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES LIMITED
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
NOTE 4 – Inventories:

Inventories, net of reserves, consisted of the following:

   March 31,
2018
   December 31,
2017
 
   (U.S. $ in millions) 

Finished products

  $2,772   $2,689 

Raw and packaging materials

   1,483    1,454 

Products in process

   646    597 

Materials in transit and payments on account

   212    184 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 
  $5,113   $4,924 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

   
March 31,
   
December 31,
 
   
2022
   
2021
 
   
(U.S. $ in millions)
 
Finished products
  $1,985   $1,932 
Raw and packaging materials
   1,256    1,136 
Products in process
   593    587 
Materials in transit and payments on account
   178    163 
   
 
 
   
 
 
 
Total
  $4,012   $3,818 
   
 
 
   
 
 
 
NOTE 5 - Property, plant and equipment, net:

Property, plant and equipment, net, consisted of the following:

   March 31,   December 31, 
   2018   2017 
   (U.S. $ in millions) 

Machinery and equipment

  $5,759   $5,809 

Buildings

   3,307    3,329 

Computer equipment and other assets

   2,055    2,016 

Payments on account

   615    634 

Land(1)

   358    390 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 
   12,094    12,178 

Less—accumulated depreciation

   4,674    4,505 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 
  $7,420   $7,673 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

(1)Land includes long-term leasehold rights in various locations, with useful lives between 30 and 99 years.

NOTE 6 - Identifiable intangible assets:

Identifiable intangible assets consisted of the following:

   Gross carrying amount net
of impairment
   Accumulated amortization   Net carrying amount 
   March 31,   December 31,   March 31,   December 31,   March 31,   December 31, 
   2018   2017   2018   2017   2018   2017 
   (U.S. $ in millions) 

Product rights

  $21,395   $21,011   $8,728   $8,276   $12,667   $12,735 

Trade names

   618    617    64    55    554    562 

Research and development in process

   4,093    4,343    —      —      4,093    4,343 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

  $26,106   $25,971   $8,792   $8,331   $17,314   $17,640 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

TEVA PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES LIMITED

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

   
Gross carrying amount net
of impairment
   
Accumulated

amortization
   
Net carrying amount
 
   
March 31,
   
December 31,
   
March 31,
   
December 31,
   
March 31,
   
December 31,
 
   
2022
   
2021
   
2022
   
2021
   
2022
   
2021
 
   
(U.S. $ in millions)
 
Product rights
  $18,544   $18,815   $12,383   $12,318   $6,161   $6,497 
Trade names
   588    590    206    198    382    392 
In process research and development
   573    577    —      —      573    577 
   
 
 
   
 
 
   
 
 
   
 
 
   
 
 
   
 
 
 
Total
  $19,705   $19,982   $12,589   $12,516   $7,116   $7,466 
   
 
 
   
 
 
   
 
 
   
 
 
   
 
 
   
 
 
 
Product rights and trade names
Product rights and trade names are assets presented at amortized cost. These assetsProduct rights and trade names represent a portfolio of pharmaceutical products from various therapeutic categories from various acquisitions with a weighted average amortization life of approximately 1110 years.
Amortization of intangible assets was $310$200 million for the three months ended March 31, 2018 and is recorded in earnings, as relevant, under cost of sales and S&M expenses, depending on the nature of the asset.

Whenever impairment indicators are identified for definite life intangible assets, Teva reconsiders the asset’s estimated life, calculates the undiscounted value of the asset’s or asset group’s cash flows by applying an appropriate discount rate that reflects the risk factors associated with the cash flow streams and compares such value against the asset’s or asset group’s carrying amount. If the carrying amount is greater, Teva records an impairment loss for the excess of book value over fair value based on the discounted cash flows.

The more significant estimates and assumptions inherent in the estimate of the fair value of identifiable intangible assets include all assumptions associated with forecasting product profitability, including sales and cost to sell projections, R&D expenditure for ongoing support of product rights or continued development of IPR&D, estimated useful lives and IPR&D expected launch dates. Additionally, for IPR&D assets the risk of failure has been factored into the fair value measure.

Impairment of identifiable intangible assets was $206$242 million in the three months ended March 31, 20182022 and 2021, respectively.

IPR&D
Teva’s IPR&D are assets that have not yet been approved in major markets. Teva’s IPR&D is recorded in earnings under other asset impairments, restructuring and other items. See note 14.

Additional reductions to R&D intangibles relate to reclassification to product rights following regulatory approvalscomprised mainly of various generic products from the Actavis Generics acquisition of $542 million. IPR&D carries intrinsic risks that the asset might not succeed in advanced phases and may be impaired in future periods.

Intangible assets impairments
Impairments of long-lived intangible assets due to development status, changesfor the three months ended March 31, 2022 and 2021, were $149 million and $79 million, respectively.
Impairments in projected launch date or changes in commercial projections related to products under development.

In the first quarter of 2018, $103 million was reclassified from IPR&D to2022 consisted primarily of identifiable product rights of $129 million related to updated market assumptions regarding price and volume of products acquired from Actavis Generics.

Impairments in connection with mesalamine following regulatory approval for this product.

the first quarter of 2021 consisted of:

(a)
IPR&D assets of $51 million related to generic pipeline products acquired from Actavis Generics resulting from development progress and changes in other key valuation indications (e.g., market size, competition assumptions, legal landscape, launch date) in the United States; and
(b)
Identifiable product rights of $28 million related to updated market assumptions regarding price and volume of products acquired from Actavis Generics that are primarily marketed in the United States.
15

Table of Contents
TEVA PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES LIMITED

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

The fair
 value measurement of the impaired i
ntan
gible assets in the first
three
months of
2022
is based on significant unobservable inputs in the market and thus represents a Level 
3
measurement within the fair value hierarchy. The discount rate applied ranged from
7.25
% to
10
%. A probability of success factor ranging from
20
% to
100
% was used in the fair value calculation to reflect inherent regulatory and commercial risk of IPR&D.
NOTE 7 -6 – Goodwill:

The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill for the period ended March 31, 20182022 were as follows:

  Generics  Specialty  Other  Total  North
America
  Europe  Growth
Market
  Other  Total 
  (U.S. $ in millions)  (U.S. $ in millions)    

Balance as of December 31, 2017(3)

 $18,864  $8,464  $1,086  $28,414  $—    $—    $—    $—    $—   

Relative fair value allocation

  (18,864  (8,464  (1,086  (28,414  11,144   9,001   5,404   2,865   28,414 
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Balance as of January 1, 2018

  —     —     —     —     11,144   9,001   5,404   2,865   28,414 

Changes during the period:

         

Goodwill impairment(1)

        (180   (180

Goodwill disposal(2)

       (54    (54

Translation differences

      (13  269   28   1   285 
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Balance as of March 31, 2018(3)

 $—    $—    $—    $—    $11,131  $9,216  $5,252  $2,866  $28,465 
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

   
North America
   
Europe
  
International
Markets
   
Other
  
Total
 
   
(U.S. $ in millions)
    
Balance as of December 31, 2021 (1)
  $6,474   $8,544  $2,328   $2,694  $20,040 
Changes during the period:
                       
Goodwill acquired
                 12   12 
Translation differences
   9    (85  34    (24  (66
   
 
 
   
 
 
  
 
 
   
 
 
  
 
 
 
Balance as of March 31, 2022 (1)
  $6,483   $8,459  $2,362   $2,682  $19,986 
   
 
 
   
 
 
  
 
 
   
 
 
  
 
 
 
(1)Due to the goodwill impairment related to Rimsa.
(2)Due to the divestment of the women’s health business.
(3)
Accumulated goodwill impairment as of March 31, 20182022 and December 31, 20172021 was approximately $18.2 billion and $18.0 billion, respectively.$25.6 billion.

In November 2017, Teva announced a new organizational structure and leadership changes to enable strategic alignment across its portfolios, regions and functions. Teva now operates its business through three segments: North America, Europe and Growth Markets. The purpose of the new structure is to enable stronger alignment and integration between operations, commercial regions, R&D and Teva’s global marketing and portfolio function, in order to optimize its product lifecycle across the therapeutic areas. Teva’s financial results for the first quarter of 2018 are being reported under this new structure for the first time.

In addition to these three segments, Teva has other activities, primarily the active pharmaceutical ingredient (“API”) manufacturing business and certain contract manufacturing services. See note 17.

Following the announcement of its new organizational structure and leadership changes in November 2017, Teva conducted an analysis of its business segments, which led to changes in Teva’s identified reporting units, operating and reporting segments. As a result, on January 1, 2018, Teva reallocated its goodwill to the adjusted reporting units using a relative fair value allocation. In conjunction with the goodwill reallocation, Teva performed a goodwill impairment test for the balances in its adjusted reporting units, utilizing the same annual operating plan (“AOP”) and long range plan model that were used in its 2017 annual impairment test; The Company concluded that the fair value of each reporting unit was in excess of its carrying value.

During the first quarter of 2018, Teva identified an increase in certain components of the weighted average cost of capital (“WACC”), such as an increase in the risk free interest and the unlevered beta. The Company addressed these changes in rates as an indication for impairment and performed an additional impairment test as of March 31, 2018.

Based on its revised analysis, Teva recorded a goodwill impairment of $180 million related to its Rimsa reporting unit in the first quarter of 2018. The remaining goodwill allocated to this reporting unit is $706 million as of March 31, 2018. This impairment was driven by the change in fair value, including the discount rate updated for the WACC change noted above, and the change in allocated net assets to the reporting unit. See note 3.

Based on current macro-economic developments and capital markets anticipation, a possible increase in the risk free interest rate of 0.5% may result in an increase to Teva’s WACC by approximately the same amount and consequently in an additional impairment of $70 million and $100 million with respect to Rimsa and the Growth Markets reporting units, respectively.

TEVA PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES LIMITED

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

For Teva’s remaining reporting units, the percentage difference between estimated fair value and estimated carrying value in the first quarter of 2018 was 6%, 10%, 21% and 49% for Teva’s Growth Markets, Europe, North America and other reporting units, respectively.

Teva determines the fair value of its reporting units using a weighting of fair values derived from the income approach. The income approach is a forward-looking approach for estimating fair value and utilizes the 2018 remaining year forecast, projections for growth off that base with an associated price erosion, as well as terminal growth rate.value. Within the income approach, the method that was used is the discounted cash flow method. Teva startedstarts with a forecast of all the expected net cash flows associated with the reporting unit, which includes the application of a terminal value, and then appliedapplies a discount rate to arrive at a net present value amount. Cash flow projections are based on Teva’s estimates of revenue growth rates and operating margins, taking into consideration industry and market conditions. The discount rate used is based on the WACC,weighted average cost of capital (WACC), adjusted for the relevant risk associated with country-specific and business-specific characteristics. If any of these expectations were to vary materially from Teva’s assumptions, Teva could facemay record an impairment of goodwill allocated to these reporting units in the future.

The current projections related to AUSTEDO and the resolution of the opioid and price fixing litigation in North America are significant assumptions in Teva’s future projections. Additionally, certain parts of its business volumes, particularly in Europe, were impacted by the

COVID-19
pandemic. Management continues to analyze the expected pace of recovery of volumes and the related impact of the
COVID-19
pandemic on Teva’s business.
During the first quarter of 2022, management assessed developments that occurred during the quarter to determine if it was more likely than not that the fair value of any of its reporting units was below its carrying amount.
Based on this assessment, management concluded that it was not more likely than not that the fair value of any of the reporting units was below its carrying value as of March 31, 2022 and, therefore, no quantitative assessment was performed. Changes to Teva’s current assessment regarding the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on its projections and its long-term forecast related to AUSTEDO could result in future impairments.
NOTE 7 – Debt obligations:
a. Short-term debt: 
          
March 31,
   
December 31,
 
   
Weighted average interest
rate as of March 31, 2022
  
Maturity
   
2022
   
2021
 
          
(U.S. $ in millions)
 
Convertible senior debentures
   0.25  2026    23    23 
Current maturities of long-term liabilities (1)            2,054    1,403 
            
 
 
   
 
 
 
Total short-term debt
           $2,077   $1,426 
            
 
 
   
 
 
 
(1)
In April 2022, Teva repaid $302 million of its 3.25% senior notes at maturity.
16

TEVA PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES LIMITED

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

NOTE 8 – Earnings per share:

Basic earnings per share are computed by dividing net results attributable to

Convertible senior debentures
The principal amount of Teva’s ordinary shareholders by the weighted average number of ordinary shares outstanding (including fully vested restricted share units (“RSUs”)) during the period, net of treasury shares.

In computing diluted earnings per share for the three months ended March 31, 2018 and 2017, basic earnings per share was adjusted to take into account the potential dilution that could occur upon the exercise of options andnon-vested RSUs granted under employee stock compensation plans, using the treasury stock method.

Additionally, no account was taken of the potential dilution by the mandatory convertible preferred shares, amounting to 64 million (including shares that may be issued due to unpaid dividends to date) for the three months ended March 31, 2018 and 59 million for the three months ended March 31, 2017, as well as for the0.25% convertible senior debentures fordue 2026 was $23 million as of March 31, 2022 and December 31, 2021. These convertible senior debentures include a “net share settlement” feature according to which the respective periods, since both had an anti-dilutive effect on earnings per share.

principal amount will be paid in cash and in case of conversion, only the residual conversion value above the principal amount will be paid in Teva shares. Due to the “net share settlement” feature, exercisable at any time, these convertible senior debentures are classified in the Balance Sheet under short-term debt. 

b. Long-term debt:
  
Weighted average interest
rate as of March 31, 2022
  
Maturity
   
March 31,
2022
  
December 31,
2021
 
         
(U.S. $ in millions)
 
Senior notes EUR 1,500 million
   1.13  2024    698    708 
Sustainability-linked senior notes EUR 1,500 
million (1)(*)
   4.38  2030    1,674    1,699 
Senior notes EUR 1,300 million
   1.25  2023    660    670 
Sustainability-linked senior notes EUR 1,100 
million (2)(*)
   3.75  2027    1,228    1,246 
Senior notes EUR 1,000 million
   6.00  2025    1,117    1,134 
Senior notes EUR 900 million
   4.50  2025    1,004    1,020 
Senior notes EUR 750 million
   1.63  2028    833    844 
Senior notes EUR 700 
million (3)
   3.25  2022    302    307 
Senior notes EUR 700 million
   1.88  2027    780    792 
Senior notes USD 3,500 million
   3.15  2026    3,496    3,496 
Senior notes USD 3,000 million
   2.80  2023    1,453    1,453 
Senior notes USD 2,000 million
   4.10  2046    1,986    1,986 
Senior notes USD 1,250 million
   6.00  2024    1,250    1,250 
Senior notes USD 1,250 million
   6.75  2028    1,250    1,250 
Senior notes USD 1,000 million
   7.13  2025    1,000    1,000 
Sustainability-linked senior notes USD 1,000 
million (2)(*)
   4.75  2027    1,000    1,000 
Sustainability-linked senior notes USD 1,000 
million (1)(*)
   5.13  2029    1,000    1,000 
Senior notes USD 844 million
   2.95  2022    714    715 
Senior notes USD 789 million
   6.15  2036    783    783 
Senior notes CHF 350 million
   0.50  2022    378    382 
Senior notes CHF 350 million
   1.00  2025    380    383 
            
 
 
   
 
 
 
Total senior notes
            22,985    23,118 
Other long-term debt
            2    2 
Less current maturities
            (2,054   (1,403
Less debt issuance costs
            (93   (100
            
 
 
   
 
 
 
Total senior notes and loans
           $20,840   $21,617 
(1)
If Teva fails to achieve certain sustainability performance targets, the interest rate shall increase by
0.125%-0.375%
per annum, from and including May 9, 2026.
(2)
If Teva fails to achieve certain sustainability performance targets, a
one-time
premium payment of
0.15%-0.45%
out of the principal amount will be paid at maturity or upon earlier redemption, if such redemption is on or after May 9, 2026.
(3)
In April 2022, Teva repaid $302 million of its 3.25% senior notes at maturity.
17

TEVA PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES LIMITED

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

NOTE 9 – Revenue from contracts with customers:

On January 1, 2018, Teva adopted the new accounting standard ASC 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers, and all the related amendments (“new revenue standard”) to all contracts using the modified retrospective method. The cumulative effect of initially applying the new revenue standard was immaterial.

Revenue recognition prior to the adoption of the new revenue standard

Please refer to note 1 to the consolidated financial statements and critical accounting policies included in our Annual Report on Form10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017 for a summary of our significant accounting policies

Revenue recognition following the adoption of the new revenue standard

A contract with a customer exists only when: the parties to the contract have approved it and are committed to perform their respective obligations, the Company can identify each party’s rights regarding the distinct goods or services to be transferred (“performance obligations”), the Company can determine the transaction price for the goods or services to be transferred, the contract has commercial substance and it is probable that the Company will collect the consideration to which it will be entitled in exchange for the goods or services that will be transferred to the customer.

Revenues are recorded in the amount of consideration to which the Company expects to be entitled in exchange for performance obligations upon transfer of control to the customer, excluding amounts collected on behalf of other third parties and sales taxes.

The amount of consideration to which Teva expects to be entitled varies as a result of rebates, chargebacks, returns and other sales reserve and allowances (“SR&A”) the Company offers its customers and their customers, as well as the occurrence or nonoccurrence of future events, including milestone events. A minimum amount of variable consideration is recorded concurrently with the satisfaction of performance obligations to the extent that it is probable that a significant reversal in the amount of cumulative revenue recognized will not occur when the uncertainty associated with the variable consideration is subsequently resolved. Estimates of variable consideration are based on historical experience and the specific terms in the individual agreements (which the Company believes approximates expected value). Rebates and chargebacks are the largest components of SR&A. For further description of SR&A components and how they are estimated, see “Variable consideration” below.

Shipping and handling costs after control over a product has transferred to a customer are accounted for as a fulfillment cost and are recorded under S&M expenses.

Teva does not adjust the promised amount of consideration for the effects of a significant financing component since the Company expects, at contract inception, that the period between the time of transfer of the promised goods or services to the customer and the time the customer pays for these goods or services to be generally one year or less. The Company’s credit terms to customers are in average between thirty and ninety days.

The Company generally recognizes the incremental costs of obtaining contracts as an expense since the amortization period of the assets that the Company otherwise would have recognized is one year or less. The costs are recorded under S&M expenses. Similarly, Teva does not disclose the value of unsatisfied performance obligations for contracts with original expected duration of one year or less.

TEVA PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES LIMITED

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

Disaggregation of revenue

The following table disaggregates Teva’s revenues by major revenue streams. For additional information on disaggregation of revenues see note 17.

   March 31, 2018 
   North America   Europe   Growth Markets   Other activities   Total 
   (U.S. dollars in millions) 

Sale of goods

   2,168    1,429    519    177    4,293 

Licensing arrangements

   32    10    20    2    64 

Distribution

   331    3    153    —      487 

Other

   —      —      58    163    221 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 
  $2,531   $1,442   $750   $342   $5,065 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 
   March 31, 2017 
   North America   Europe   Growth Markets   Other activities   Total 
   (U.S. dollars in millions) 

Sale of goods

   2,824    1,287    529    196    4,836 

Licensing arrangements

   121    1    1    1    124 

Distribution

   295    53    125    —      473 

Other

   —      —      63    154    217 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 
  $3,240   $1,341   $718   $351   $5,650 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Nature of revenue streams

Revenue from sales of goods, including sales to distributors is recognized when the customer obtains control of the product. This generally occurs when products are shipped once the Company has a present right to payment, legal title, and risk and rewards of ownership are obtained by the customer.

Licensing arrangements performance obligations generally include intellectual property (“IP”) rights, certain R&D and contract manufacturing services. The Company accounts for IP rights and services separately if they are distinct – i.e. if they are separately identifiable from other items in the arrangement and if the customer can benefit from them on their own or with other resources that are readily available to the customer. The consideration is allocated between IP rights and services based on their relative stand-alone selling prices.

Revenue for distinct IP rights is accounted for based on the nature of the promise to grant the license. In determining whether the Company’s promise is to provide a right to access its IP or a right to use its IP, the Company considers the nature of the IP to which the customer will have rights. IP is either functional IP which has significant standalone functionality or symbolic IP which does not have significant standalone functionality. Revenue from functional IP is recognized at the point in time when control of the distinct license is transferred to the customer, when the Company has a present right to payment and risks and rewards of ownership are transferred to the customer. Revenue from symbolic IP is recognized over the access period to the Company’s IP.

Revenue from sales based milestones and royalties promised in exchange for a license of IP is recognized only when, or as, the later of subsequent sale or the performance obligation to which some or all of the sales-based royalty has been allocated, has been satisfied. Revenues from licensing arrangements included royalty income of $21 million and $105 million for the three months ended March 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively. The amount recognized in 2017 includes royalty income resulting from the Ninlaro® transaction.

Distribution revenues are derived from sales of third-party products for which the Company acts as distributor, mostly in the United States via Anda and in Israel. The Company is the principal in these arrangements and therefore records revenue on a gross basis as it controls the promised goods before transferring these goods to the customer. Revenue is recognized when the customer obtains control of the products. This generally occurs when products are shipped once the Company has a present right to payment and legal title, and risk and rewards of ownership are obtained by the customer.

TEVA PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES LIMITED

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

Other revenues are primarily comprised of contract manufacturing services, sales of medical devices, and other miscellaneous items. The Company is generally the principal in these arrangements and therefore records revenue on a gross basis as it controls the promised goods before transferring these goods to the customer. Revenue is recognized when the customer obtains control of the products. This generally occurs when products are shipped once the Company has a present right to payment, legal title, and risk and rewards of ownership are obtained by the customer.

Contract assets and liabilities

Contract assets are mainly comprised of trade receivables net of allowance for doubtful debts, which includes amounts billed and currently due from customers.

Contract liabilities are mainly comprised of deferred revenues, which were immaterial as of March 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017, respectively.

Variable consideration

Variable consideration mainly includes SR&A, comprised of rebates (including Medicaid and other governmental program discounts), chargebacks, returns and other promotional (including shelf stock adjustments) items. Provisions for prompt payment discounts are netted against trade receivables.

The Company recognizes these provisions at the time of sale and adjusts them if the actual amounts differ from the estimated provisions. The following briefly describes the nature of each deduction and how provisions are estimated:

Rebates

Rebates are primarily related to volume incentives and are offered to key customers to promote loyalty. These rebate programs provide that, upon the attainment ofpre-established volumes or the attainment of revenue milestones for a specified period, the customer receives a rebate. Since rebates are contractually agreed upon, they are estimated based on the specific terms in each agreement based on historical trends and expected sales. Externally obtained inventory levels are evaluated in relation to estimates made for rebates payable to indirect customers.

Medicaid and Other Governmental Rebates

Pharmaceutical manufacturers whose products are covered by the Medicaid program are required to rebate to each state a percentage of their average manufacturer’s price for the products dispensed. Many states have also implemented supplemental rebate programs that obligate manufacturers to pay rebates in excess of those required under federal law. The Company estimates these rebates based on historical trends of rebates paid, as well as on changes in wholesaler inventory levels and increases or decreases in sales.

TEVA PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES LIMITED

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

Chargebacks

The Company has arrangements with various third parties, such as managed care organizations and drug store chains, establishing prices for certain of Teva’s products. While these arrangements are made between the Company and the customers, the customers independently select a wholesaler from which they purchase the products. Alternatively, certain wholesalers may enter into agreements with the customers, with Teva’s concurrence, which establish the pricing for certain products which the wholesalers provide. Under either arrangement, Teva will issue a credit (referred to as a “chargeback”) to the wholesaler for the difference between the invoice price to the wholesaler and the customer’s contract price. Provisions for chargebacks involve estimates of contract prices of over 2,000 products and multiple contracts with multiple wholesalers. The provision for chargebacks varies in relation to changes in product mix, pricing and the level of inventory at the wholesalers and therefore will not necessarily fluctuate in proportion to an increase or decrease in sales. Provisions for estimating chargebacks are calculated using historical chargeback experience and/or expected chargeback levels for new products and anticipated pricing changes. Teva considers current and expected price competition when evaluating the provision for chargebacks. Chargeback provisions are compared to externally obtained distribution channel reports for reasonableness. The Company regularly monitors the provision for chargebacks and makes adjustments when the Company believes that actual chargebacks may differ from estimated provisions.

Other Promotional Arrangements

Other promotional or incentive arrangements are periodically offered to customers, specifically related to the launch of products or other targeted promotions. Provisions are made in the period for which the Company can estimate the incentive earned by the customer, in accordance with the contractual terms. The Company regularly monitors the provision for other promotional arrangements and makes adjustments when Teva believes that the actual provision may differ from the estimated provisions.

Shelf Stock Adjustments

The custom in the pharmaceutical industry is generally to grant customers a shelf stock adjustment based on the customers’ existing inventory contemporaneously with decreases in the market price of the related product. The most significant of these relate to products for which an exclusive or semi-exclusive period exists. Provisions for price reductions depend on future events, including price competition, new competitive launches and the level of customer inventories at the time of the price decline. Teva regularly monitors the competitive factors that influence the pricing of its products and customer inventory levels and adjust these estimates where appropriate.

Returns

Returns primarily relate to customer returns of expired products which, the customer has the right to return up to one year following the expiration date. Such returned products are destroyed and credits and/or refunds are issued to the customer for the value of the returns. Accordingly, no returned assets are recoded in connection with those products. The returns provision is estimated by applying a historical return rate to the amounts of revenue estimated to be subject to returns. Revenue subject to returns is estimated based on the lag time from time of sale to date of return. The estimated lag time is developed by analyzing historical experience. Additionally, The Company considers specific factors, such as levels of inventory in the distribution channel, product dating and expiration, size and maturity of launch, entrance of new competitors, changes in formularies or packaging and any changes to customer terms, for determining the overall expected levels of returns.

Prompt Pay Discounts

Prompt pay discounts are offered to most customers to encourage timely payment. Discounts are estimated at the time of invoice based on historical discounts in relation to sales. Prompt pay discounts are almost always utilized by customers. As a result, the actual discounts do not vary significantly from the estimated amount.

TEVA PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES LIMITED

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

SR&A to U.S. customers comprised approximately 86% of the Company’s total SR&A as of March 31, 2018, with the remaining balance primarily in Canada and Germany. The changes in SR&A for third-party sales for the period ended March 31, 2018 were as follows:

   Sales Reserves and Allowances    
   Reserves
included in
Accounts
Receivable,
net
  Rebates  Medicaid and
other
governmental
allowances
  Chargebacks  Returns  Other  Total reserves
included in
Sales Reserves
and Allowances
  Total 
   (U.S. dollars in millions) 

Balance at December 31, 2017

  $196  $3,077  $1,908  $1,849  $780  $267  $7,881  $8,077 

Provisions related to sales made in current year period

   136   1,865   357   2,711   70   103   5,106   5,242 

Provisions related to sales made in prior periods

   2   (19  3   (1  21   (8  (4  (2

Credits and payments

   (157  (2,051  (349  (2,927  (119  (139  (5,585  (5,742

Translation differences

   1   9   2   1   1   (1  12   13 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Balance at March 31, 2018

  $178   2,881  $1,921  $1,633  $753  $222  $7,410  $7,588 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

NOTE 10 – Accumulated other comprehensive loss:

The components of, and changes within, accumulated other comprehensive losses attributable to Teva are presented in the table below:

   Net Unrealized Gains/(Losses)  Benefit Plans    
   Foreign
currency
translation
adjustments
  Available-for-
sale securities
   Derivative
financial
instruments
  Actuarial
gains/(losses)
and prior
service
(costs)/credits
  Total 

Balance as of December 31, 2017*

  $(1,316 $1   $(442 $(91 $(1,848
  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications

   156   1    (51  —     106 

Amounts reclassified to the statements of income

   —     —      7   —     7 
  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net other comprehensive income (loss) before tax

   156   1    (44  —     113 
  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net other comprehensive income (loss) after tax**

   156   1    (44  —     113 
  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Balance as of March 31, 2018

  $(1,160 $2   $(486 $(91 $(1,735
  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

*Following
Interest rate adjustments and a potential
one-time
premium payment related to the adoption of ASU 2016-01, the Company recorded a $5 million opening balance reclassification from accumulated other comprehensive income to retained earnings.sustainability-linked bonds are treated as bifurcated embedded derivatives. See note 8d.
**Amounts do not include foreign currency translation adjustments attributable tonon-controlling interests of a $83 million gain.

TEVA PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES LIMITED

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

   Net Unrealized Gains/(Losses)  Benefit Plans    
   Foreign
currency
translation
adjustments
  Available-for-
sale securities
  Derivative
financial
instruments
  Actuarial
gains/(losses)
and prior
service
(costs)/credits
  Total 

Balance, December 31, 2016

  $(2,769 $(7 $(302 $(81 $(3,159
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Other comprehensive income/(loss) before reclassifications

   448   90   2   (9  531 

Amounts reclassified to the statements of income

   (52  (35  6   1   (80
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net other comprehensive income/(loss) before tax

   396   55   8   (8  451 

Corresponding income tax

   —     (1  —     (5  (6
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net other comprehensive income/(loss) after tax*

   396   54   8   (13  445 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Balance, March 31, 2017

  $(2,373 $47  $(294 $(94 $(2,714
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

*Amounts do not include foreign currency translation adjustments attributable tonon-controlling interests of a $70 million gain.

NOTE 11 – Debt obligations:

Short-term debt:

   Weighted average interest
rate as of March 31, 2018
 Maturity   March 31,
2018
   December 31,
2017
 
         (U.S. $ in millions) 

Term loan JPY 28.3 billion(5)

  JPY LIBOR+0.25%  2018   $—     $251 

Convertible debentures

  0.25%  2026   514    514 

Other

  11.68%  2018    2    1 

Current maturities of long-term liabilities

 

   786    2,880 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total short term debt

 

  $1,302   $3,646 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

*Net-share settlement feature exercisable at any time.

TEVA PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES LIMITED

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

Long-term debt includes the following:

   Weighted average interest
rate as of March 31, 2018
 Maturity  March 31, 2018   December 31,
2017
 
       
   %    (U.S. $ in millions) 

Senior notes EUR 1,750 million

  0.38% 2020  $2,152   $2,095 

Senior notes EUR 1,500 million

  1.13% 2024   1,837    1,788 

Senior notes EUR 1,300 million

  1.25% 2023   1,593    1,550 

Senior notes EUR 1,000 million(3)

  2.88% 2019   —      1,199 

Senior notes EUR 900 million(1)

  4.50% 2025   1,109    —   

Senior notes EUR 750 million

  1.63% 2028   915    891 

Senior notes EUR 700 million(1)

  3.25% 2022   863    —   

Senior notes EUR 700 million

  1.88% 2027   859    837 

Senior notes USD 3,500 million

  3.15% 2026   3,492    3,492 

Senior notes USD 3,000 million

  2.20% 2021   2,997    2,996 

Senior notes USD 3,000 million

  2.80% 2023   2,992    2,992 

Senior notes USD 2,000 million

  1.70% 2019   2,000    2,000 

Senior notes USD 2,000 million

  4.10% 2046   1,984    1,984 

Senior notes USD 1,500 million(3)

  1.40% 2018   —      1,500 

Senior notes USD 1250 million(2)

  6.00% 2024   1,250    —   

Senior notes USD 1250 million(2)

  6.75% 2028   1,250    —   

Senior notes USD 844 million

  2.95% 2022   863    864 

Senior notes USD 789 million

  6.15% 2036   781    781 

Senior notes USD 700 million

  2.25% 2020   700    700 

Senior notes USD 613 million

  3.65% 2021   623    624 

Senior notes USD 588 million

  3.65% 2021   587    587 

Senior notes CHF 450 million

  1.50% 2018   472    461 

Senior notes CHF 350 million

  0.50% 2022   367    360 

Senior notes CHF 350 million

  1.00% 2025   368    360 

Senior notes CHF 300 million

  0.13% 2018   314    308 

Fair value hedge accounting adjustments

   (16   (2
     

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total senior notes

   30,352    28,367 

Term loan USD 2.5 billion(4)

  LIBOR +1.1375% 2018   —      285 

Term loan USD 2.5 billion(4)

  LIBOR +1.50% 2017-2020   —      2,000 

Term loan JPY 58.5 billion(5)

  JPY LIBOR +0.55% 2022   —      519 

Term loan JPY 35 billion(6)

  1.42% 2019   —      311 

Term loan JPY 35 billion(6)

  JPY LIBOR +0.3% 2018   —      311 
     

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total loans

   —      3,426 

Debentures USD 15 million(7)

  7.20% 2018   —      15 

Other

  7.31% 2026   5    5 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total debentures and others

   5    20 
     

 

 

   

 

 

 

Less current maturities

   (786   (2,880

Derivative instruments

   16    2 

Less debt issuance costs

   (137   (106
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total long-term debt

  $29,450   $28,829 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

TEVA PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES LIMITED

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

Debt development

(1)In March 2018, Teva Pharmaceutical Finance Netherlands II B.V., a Teva finance subsidiary, issued senior notes in an aggregate principal amount of €1.6 billion.

(2)In March 2018, Teva Pharmaceutical Finance Netherlands III B.V., a Teva finance subsidiary, issued senior notes in an aggregate principal amount of $2.5 billion.

(3)In March 2018, Teva redeemed in full its $1.5 billion 1.4% senior notes due in July 2018 and its €1.0 billion 2.88% senior notes due in April 2019.

(4)During the first quarter of 2018, Teva prepaid approximately $2.3 billion principal amount of the remaining term loan facilities.

(5)During the first quarter of 2018, Teva prepaid in full JPY 86.8 billion principal amount of the outstanding term loan facilities of which JPY 28.3 billion were in short-term debt as of December 31, 2017.

(6)During the first quarter of 2018, Teva prepaid in full JPY 70 billion of its 1.42% and JPY LIBOR+0.3% outstanding term loans.

(7)During the first quarter of 2018, Teva prepaid in full $15 million of its outstanding debentures.

Long term debt was issued by several indirect wholly-owned subsidiaries of the Company and is fully and unconditionally guaranteed by the Company as to payment of all principal, interest, discount and additional amounts, (as defined), if any.

Long term The long-term debt outlined in the above table is generally redeemable at any time at varying redemption prices plus accrued and unpaid interest.

Long-term debt as of March 31, 20182022 is effectively denominated (taking into consideration cross currency swap agreements) in the following currencies: 63% in U.S. dollar, 64%,35% in euro 34% and 2% in Swiss franc 2%.

franc.

Teva’s principal sources of short-term liquidity are its cash on hand, existing cash investments, liquid securities and available credit facilities, primarily
, as of March 31, 2022,
its $3 $2.3 
billion unsecured syndicated revolving credit facility (“RCF”),entered into in April 2019, which was not utilized as of March 31, 2018, as well as internally generated funds. replaced in April 2022 (“RCF”).
In connection with the requirements of the RCF, the CompanyApril 2022, Teva entered into negative pledge agreementsan unsecured syndicated sustainability-linked revolving credit facility of $1.8 billion with a maturity date of April 2026, with two one-year extension options. The RCF contains certain bankscovenants, including certain limitations on incurring liens and institutional investors. Under the agreements, the Companyindebtedness and its subsidiaries have undertaken not to register floating charges on assets in favormaintenance of any third parties without the prior consent of the banks, to maintain certain financial ratios, including the requirement to maintain compliance with a net debt to EBITDAmaximum leverage ratio, which becomes more restrictive over time,time. In addition, the RCF is linked to two sustainability performance targets, (i) the company’s S&P ESG Score and to fulfill other restrictions, as stipulated by(ii) number of new regulatory submissions in low and middle-income countries. The RCF margin may increase or decrease depending on the agreements.Company’s sustainability performance.
Under the terms of the RCF, the leverage ratio shall not exceed 4.50x in the second and third quarters of 2022, 4.25x in the fourth quarter of 2022, 4.00x in the first, second and third quarters of 2023, 3.75x in the fourth quarter of 2023 and 3.50x in 2024 and onwards.
The RCF can be used for general corporate purposes, including repaying existing debt. As of March 31, 2018,2022 and as of the date of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, no amounts were outstanding under the RCF. Based on current and forecasted results, the Company didexpects that it will not have any outstanding debt underexceed the financial covenant thresholds set forth in the RCF which is our only debt subject towithin one year from the net debt to EBITDA covenant Assuming utilizationdate the financial statements are issued. 

Under specified circumstances, including non-compliance with any of the RCF, and under specified circumstances, includingnon-compliance with such covenants described above and the unavailability of any waiver, amendment or other modification thereto, and the expiration of any applicable grace period thereto, substantially allCompany will not be able to borrow under the RCF. Additionally, violations of the Company’s debt could be negatively impacted bynon-compliance with such covenants. The Company has sufficient resources to meet its financial obligations incovenants, under the ordinary course of business for at least twelve months from the date of the release of this Quarterly Report.

TEVA PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES LIMITED

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

NOTE 12 – Fair value measurement:

Teva’s financial instruments consist mainly of cash and cash equivalents, investment in securities, current andnon-current receivables, short-term debt, current andnon-current payables, contingent consideration, senior notes and loans, convertible senior debentures and derivatives.

The fair value of the financial instruments included in working capital andnon-current receivables and payables approximates their carrying value. The fair value of term loans and bank facilities mostly approximates their carrying value, since they bear interest at rates close to the prevailing market rates.

Financial instruments measured at fair value

The Company measures fair value and discloses fair value measurements for financial assets and liabilities. Fair value is based on the price thatabove-mentioned circumstances, would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liabilityresult in an orderly transaction between market participants atevent of default in all borrowings under the measurement date.

The accounting standard establishesRCF and, when greater than a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes observable and unobservable inputs used to measure fair value into three broad levels, which are described below:

Level 1: Quoted prices (unadjusted)specified threshold amount as set forth in active markets that are accessible at the measurement date for assets or liabilities. The fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority to Level 1 inputs.

Level 2: Observable inputs that are based on inputs not quoted on active markets, but corroborated by market data.

Level 3: Unobservable inputs are used when little or no market data is available. The fair value hierarchy gives the lowest priority to Level 3 inputs.

In determining fair value, the Company utilizes valuation techniques that maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs, to the extent possible, and considers counterparty credit risk in its assessment of fair value.

There were no transfers between Level 1, Level 2 and Level 3 during the first quarter of 2018.

Financial items carried at fair value as of March 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017 are classified in the tables below in one of the three categories described above:

TEVA PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES LIMITED

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

   March 31, 2018 
   Level 1   Level 2   Level 3   Total 
   (U.S. $ in millions) 

Cash and cash equivalents:

        

Money markets

  $6   $—     $—     $6 

Cash, deposits and other

   1,412    —      —      1,412 

Investment in securities:

        

Equity securities

   58    —      —      58 

Other, mainly debt securities

   13    —      19    32 

Derivatives:

        

Asset derivatives - options and forward contracts

   —      15    —      15 

Asset derivatives - cross currency swaps

   —      4    —      4 

Liabilities derivatives - options and forward contracts

   —      (18   —      (18

Liabilities derivatives - interest rate and cross-currency swaps

   —      (141   —      (141

Contingent consideration*

   —      —      (708   (708
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

  $1,489   $(140  $(689  $660 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 
   December 31, 2017 
   Level 1 �� Level 2   Level 3   Total 
   (U.S. $ in millions) 

Cash and cash equivalents:

        

Money markets

  $5   $—     $—     $5 

Cash, deposits and other

   958    —      —      958 

Investment in securities:

        

Equity securities

   65    —      —      65 

Structured investment vehicles

   —      —      —      —   

Other, mainly debt securities

   14    —      18    32 

Derivatives:

        

Asset derivatives - options and forward contracts

   —      17    —      17 

Asset derivatives - cross-currency swaps

   —      25    —      25 

Liability derivatives - options and forward contracts

   —      (15   —      (15

Liabilities derivatives - interest rate and cross-currency swaps

   —      (98   —      (98

Contingent consideration*

   —      —      (735   (735
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

  $1,042   $(71  $(717  $254 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

*Contingent consideration represents liabilities recorded at fair value in connection with acquisitions.

Teva determined the fair value of the liability for the contingent consideration based on a probability-weighted discounted cash flow analysis. This fair value measurement is based on significant unobservable inputs in the market and thus represents a Level 3 measurement within the fair value hierarchy. The fair value of the contingent consideration is based on several factors, such as: the cash flows projected from the success of unapproved product candidates; the probability of success of product candidates, including risks associated with uncertainty regarding achievement and payment of milestone events; the time and resources needed to complete the development and approval of product candidates; the life of the potential commercialized products and associated risks of obtaining regulatory approvals in the U.S. and Europe, and the risk adjusted discount rate for fair value measurement.

The contingent consideration is evaluated quarterly, or more frequently, if circumstances dictate. Changes in the fair value of contingent consideration are recorded in earnings.

Significant changes in unobservable inputs, mainly the probability of success and cash flows projected, could result in material changes to the contingent consideration liability.

TEVA PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES LIMITED

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

The following table summarizes the activity for those financial assets and liabilities where fair value measurements are estimated utilizing Level 3 inputs:

   Three months ended
March 31, 2018
 
  
   (U.S. $ in millions) 

Fair value at the beginning of the period

  $(717

Revaluation of debt securities

   1 

Adjustments to provisions for contingent consideration:

  

Actavis Generics transaction

   (6

Labrys transaction

   (1

Eagle transaction

   (1

Settlement of contingent consideration:

  

Eagle transaction

   35 
  

 

 

 

Fair value at the end of the period

  $(689
  

 

 

 

Financial instruments not measured at fair value

Financial instruments measured on a basis other than fair value mostly consisteach series of senior notes and convertiblesustainability-linked senior debenturesnotes is outstanding, could lead to an event of default under the Company’s senior notes and sustainability-linked senior notes due to cross acceleration provisions.

Teva expects that it will continue to have sufficient cash resources to support its debt service payments and all other financial obligations within one year from the date that the financial statements are presented in the table below in terms of fair value:

   Estimated fair value* 
   March 31,
2018
   December 31,
2017
 
   (U.S. $ in millions) 

Senior notes included under senior notes and loans

  $26,365   $23,459 

Senior notes and convertible debentures included under short-term debt

   1,242    2,713 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

  $27,607   $26,172 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

*The fair value was estimated based on quoted market prices, where available.

TEVA PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES LIMITED

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

issued.

NOTE 138 – Derivative instruments and hedging activities:

a. Foreign exchange risk management:
In the first three months of 2022, approximately 48% of Teva’s revenues were denominated in currencies other than the U.S. dollar. As a result, Teva is subject to significant foreign currency risks.
The following table summarizesCompany enters into forward exchange contracts, purchases and writes options in order to hedge the notional amounts forcurrency exposure on balance sheet items, revenues and expenses. In addition, the Company takes measures to reduce exposure by using natural hedging. The Company also acts to offset risks in opposite directions among the subsidiaries within Teva. The currency hedged items whenare usually denominated in the following main currencies: the euro, the Swiss franc, the Japanese yen, the British pound, the Russian ruble, the Canadian dollar, the Polish zloty, the Indian rupee and other European and Latin American currencies. Depending on market conditions, foreign currency risk is also managed through the use of foreign currency debt.
18

TEVA PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES LIMITED
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
The Company may choose to hedge against possible fluctuations in foreign subsidiaries net assets (“net investment hedge”) and entered into cross currency swaps and forward contracts in the past in order to hedge such an exposure.
Most of the counterparties to the derivatives are major banks and the Company is monitoring the associated inherent credit risks. The Company does not enter into derivative transactions for trading purposes.
b. Interest risk management:
The Company raises capital through various debt instruments, including senior notes, sustainability-linked senior notes, bank loans, convertible debentures and syndicated revolving credit facility that bear a fixed or variable interest rate. In some cases, the Company has swapped from a fixed to a variable interest rate (“fair value hedge”) and from a fixed to a fixed interest rate with an exchange from a currency other than the functional currency (“cash flow hedge”), thereby reducing overall interest expenses or hedging risks associated with interest rate fluctuations.
c. Bifurcated embedded derivatives:
Upon issuance of sustainability-linked senior notes, Teva recognized embedded derivatives related to interest rate adjustments and a potential
one-time
premium payment upon failure to achieve certain sustainability performance targets, such as access to medicines in
low-to-middle-income
countries and absolute greenhouse gas emissions reduction, which were bifurcated and are designatedaccounted for separately as hedge accounting:

   March 31,
2018
   December 31,
2017
 
   (U.S. $ in millions) 

Cross-currency swap – cash flow hedge

  $588   $588 

Cross-currency swap – net investment hedge

   1,000    1,000 

Interest rate swap – fair value hedge

   500    500 

derivative financial instruments. As of March 31, 2022 the fair value of these derivative instruments is negligible.

d. Derivative instruments outstanding:
The following table summarizes the classification and fair values of derivative instruments:

   Fair value 
   Designated as hedging
instruments
   Not designated as hedging
instruments
 
   March 31,
2018
   December 31,
2017
   March 31,
2018
   December 31,
2017
 

Reported under

  (U.S. $ in millions) 

Asset derivatives:

        

Other current assets:

        

Option and forward contracts

  $—     $—     $15   $17 

Othernon-current assets:

        

Cross-currency swaps – cash flow hedge

   4    25    —      —   

Liability derivatives:

        

Other current liabilities:

        

Option and forward contracts

   —      —      (18   (15

Other taxes and long-term liabilities:

        

Cross-currency swaps – net investment hedge

   (125   (96   —      —   

Senior notes and loans:

        

Interest rate swaps – fair value hedge

   (16   (2   —      —   

Derivatives on foreign exchange contracts mainly hedge Teva’s balance sheet items

   
Fair value
 
   
Not designated as hedging

instruments
 
   
March 31,

2022
   
December 31,

2021
 
Reported under
  
(U.S. $ in millions)
 
Asset derivatives:
          
Other current assets:
          
Option and forward contracts
  $56   $30 
Liability derivatives:
          
Other current liabilities:
          
Option and forward contracts
   (31   (23
The table below provides information regarding the location and amount of
pre-tax
(gains) losses from currency exposure but arederivatives not designated as hedging instruments for accounting purposes. With respect to such derivatives, lossesinstruments:
   
 
Financial expenses, net
 
  
 
Net revenues
 
   
 
 
   
 
 
 
   
 
Three months ended,
 
  
 
Three months ended,
 
   
 
 
   
 
 
 
   
March 31,
2022
   
March 31,
2021
   
March 31,
2022
   
March 31,
2021
 
   
 
 
   
 
 
   
 
 
   
 
 
 
Reported under
  
(U.S. $ in millions)
 
Line items in which effects of hedges are recorded
  $258   $290   $(3,661  $(3,982
Option and forward contracts (1)
   (5   (70   0      0   
Option and forward contracts economic hedge (2)
   0      0      (19   (28
19

TEVA PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES LIMITED

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

Certain

(1)
Teva uses foreign exchange contracts (mainly option and forward contracts) to hedge balance sheet items from currency exposure. These foreign exchange contracts are not designated as hedging instruments for accounting purposes. In connection with these foreign exchange contracts, Teva recognizes gains or losses that offset the revaluation of the balance sheet items also recorded under financial expenses, net.
(2)
Teva entered into option and forward contracts designed to limit the exposure of foreign exchange fluctuations on projected revenues and expenses recorded in euro, the Swiss franc, the Japanese yen, the British pound, the Russian ruble, the Canadian dollar and some other currencies to protect its projected operating results for 2021 and 2022. These derivative instruments do not meet the criteria for hedge accounting, however, they are accounted for as an economic hedge. These derivative instruments, which may include hedging transactions against future projected revenues and expenses, are recognized on the balance sheet at their fair value on a quarterly basis, while the foreign exchange impact on the underlying revenues and expenses may occur in subsequent quarters. In the first quarter of 2022, the positive impact from these derivatives recognized under revenues was $19 million. In the first quarter of 2021, the positive impact from these derivatives recognized under revenues was $28 million. Changes in the fair value of the derivative instruments are recognized in the same line item in the statements of income as the underlying exposure being hedged. The cash flows associated with these derivatives are reflected as cash flows from operating activities in the consolidated statements of cash flows.
e. Amortizations due to terminated derivative instruments:
Forward starting interest rate swaps and treasury lock agreements
In 2015, Teva entered into forward starting interest rate swaps and treasury lock agreements matured duringto protect the first half of 2016. In July 2016, Teva terminatedCompany from interest rate fluctuations in connection with a future debt issuance the remainingCompany was planning. These forward starting interest rate swaps and treasury lock agreements.agreements were terminated in July 2016 upon the debt issuance. The termination of these transactions resulted in a loss position of $493 million, of which $242 million were settled on October 7, 2016 and the remaining amount was settledrecorded in January 2017. The change in fair value of these instruments recorded as part of other comprehensive income will be(loss) and is amortized under financial expenses, net over the life of the debt. Such losses mainly reflect the changes in the benchmark interest rate between the date the agreements were entered into and the actual date of the U.S. debt issuance in July 2016.

With respect to thethese forward starting interest rate swaps and treasury lock agreements, losses of $7 million and $8 million were recognized under financial expenses, net for each of the three months ended March 31, 20182022 and 2017.

2021, respectively.

Fair value hedge
In the third quarter of 2016, Teva terminated interest rate swap agreements designated as a fair value hedge relating to certainits 2.95% senior notes.notes due 2022 with respect to $844 million notional amount and its 3.65% senior notes due 2021 with respect to $450 million notional amount. Settlement of these transactions resulted in a gain position of $41 million. The fair value hedge accounting adjustments of these instruments, which are recorded under senior notes and loans, will beare amortized under financial expenses, net over the life of the debt. With respect to thesedebt as additional interest expense.
In the third quarter of 2019, Teva terminated $500 million interest rate swap agreements gains of $2 million were recognized under financial expenses, net for the three months ended March 31, 2018 and 2017.

In the fourth quarter of 2016, Teva entered into an interest rate swap agreement designated as a fair value hedge relating to its 2.8% senior notes due 2023 with respect to $500$3,000 million notional amountamount. Settlement of outstanding debt.

In eachthese transactions resulted in cash proceeds of $10 million. The fair value hedge accounting adjustments of these instruments, which are recorded under senior notes and loans, are amortized under financial expenses, net over the life of the first and second quartersdebt.

Cash flow hedge
In the fourth quarter of 2017,2019, Teva entered into a cross currencyterminated $588 million cross-currency swap agreementagreements against its outstanding 3.65% senior notes maturing in 2020 with a notional amountNovember 2021. Settlement of $500these transactions resulted in cash proceeds of $95 million. These cross currency swaps were designated as aThe cash flow hedge accounting adjustments of these instruments, which are recorded under senior notes and loans, are amortized under financial expenses, net investment hedge of Teva’s euro denominated net assets, in order to reduceover the risk of adverse exchange rate fluctuations. The effective portionlife of the hedge will be determined by looking into changes in spot exchange rate. The change in fair value of the cross currency swap attributable to changes other than those due to fluctuations in the spot exchange rates are excluded from the assessment of hedge effectiveness and are reported directly in the statement of income.

debt.

With respect to these cross currencythe interest rate swap and cross-currency swap agreements, gains of $7
a
$1 million wereloss was recognized under financial expenses, net for the three months ended March 31, 2018. The amount recorded in2022. NaN gains or losses were recognized for the statementthree months ended March 31, 2021. 
20

Table of income in the first quarter of 2017 was not material.

Contents

TEVA PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES LIMITED

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

NOTE 149Other impairments, restructuringLegal settlements and other items:

Other impairments, restructuring and other items consisted of the following:

   Three months ended
March 31,
 
   2018   2017 
   (U.S. $ in millions) 

Restructuring expenses

  $247   $130 

Integration expenses

   —      23 

Contingent consideration

   8    21 

Impairments of long-lived assets

   432    11 

Other

   20    55 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

  $707   $240 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

In determining the estimated fair value of long-lived assets, Teva utilized a discounted cash flow model. The key assumptions within the model related to forecasting future revenue and operating income, an appropriate WACC and an appropriate terminal value based on the nature of the long-lived asset. The Company’s updated forecasts of net cash flows for the impaired assets reflect, among others, the following: (i) for IPR&D assets, the impact of changes to the development programs, the projected development and regulatory timeframes and the risks associated with these assets; and (ii) for product rights, pricing and volume projections, as well as patent life and any significant changes to the competitive environment.

As a result of Teva’s plant rationalization acceleration, following the two year restructuring plan that was announced in December 2017, to the extent the Company will change its plans on any given asset and/or the assumptions underlying such plan, there could be additional impairments in the future.

Impairments

loss contingencies:
Impairments of long-lived intangible assets in the first quarter of 2018 were $206 million, mainly consisting of:

Identifiable IPR&D of $117 million mainly related to revaluation of generic products acquired from Actavis Generics due to development progress and changes in other key valuation indications (market size, legal landscape, launch date or discount rate).

Identifiable product rights of $76 million due to revaluation of Actavis Generics product rights in the United States.

Impairments of property, plant and equipment in the first quarter of 2018 were $226 million, mainly consisting of:

$147 million related to restructuring costs, including:

$113 million related to site closures in Israel; and

$34 million related to headquarters and distribution sites consolidation in the United States;

Other impairment costs, mainly $56 million related to a plant located India, in connection with the P&G separation agreement.

TEVA PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES LIMITED

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

Restructuring

In the first quarter of 2018,2022, Teva recorded $247expenses of $1,124 million of restructuring expenses,in legal settlements and loss contingencies, compared to $130$104 million in the first quarter of 2017.2021. The expenses in the first quarter of 20182022 were primarilymainly related to headcount reductions across all functions.

Since Teva’s announcementan update of its restructuring plan, the Company reduced its global headcount by approximately 6,200 full-time-equivalent employees.

Teva alsoestimated settlement provision recorded a $226 million impairment of property, plant and equipment related to restructuring costs as detailed in “— Impairments” above.

connection with the remaining opioid cases. The following table provides the components of costs associated with Teva’s restructuring plan, including costs related to exit and disposal activities:

   Three months ended March 31, 
   2018   2017 
   (U.S. $ in millions) 

Restructuring

    

Employee termination

  $228   $95 

Other

   19    35 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

  $247   $130 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

The following table provides the components of and changes in the Company’s restructuring accruals:

   Employee termination
costs
   Other   Total 
   (U.S. $ in millions ) 

Balance as of January 1, 2018

  $(294  $(17  $(311

Provision

   (228   (19   (247

Utilization and other*

   129    7    136 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Balance as of March 31, 2018

  $(393  $(29  $(422
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 
*Includes adjustments for foreign currency translation.

NOTE 15 – Legal settlements and loss contingencies:

Legal settlements and loss contingencies for the three months ended March 31, 2018 resulted in income of $1.3 billion compared to expenses of $20 million for the three months ended March 31, 2017. The income in the first quarter of 2018 consisted primarily of2021 were mainly due to the working capital adjustment with Allergan, the Rimsa settlement and a reversal of the reserve recorded in the second quarter of 2017 with respect toprovision for the carvedilol patent litigation, following the reversal of the verdict granting the award to GSK. litigation.

As of March 31, 20182022 and December 31, 2017, an accrued amount2021, Teva’s provision for legal settlements and loss contingencies of $872recorded under accrued expenses and other taxes and long-term liabilities was $3,762 million and $1.2 billion, respectively, was recorded in accrued expenses.

TEVA PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES LIMITED

Notes$2,710 million, respectively. In connection with Teva’s provision for legal settlements and loss contingencies as of March 31, 2022 and December 31, 2021, related to Consolidated Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

the Ontario Teachers Securities Litigation, Teva also recognized an insurance receivable.

NOTE 1610 – Commitments and Contingencies:

contingencies:

General

From time to time, Teva and/or its subsidiaries are subject to claims for damages and/or equitable relief arising in the ordinary course of business. In addition, as described below, in large part as a result of the nature of its business, Teva is frequently subject to litigation. Teva generally believes that it has meritorious defenses to the actions brought against it and vigorously pursues the defense or settlement of each such action. Except as described below, Teva does not currently have a reasonable basis to estimate the loss, or range of loss, that is reasonably possible with respect to matters disclosed in this note.

Teva records a provision in its financial statements to the extent that it concludes that a contingent liability is probable and the amount thereof is estimable. Based upon the status of the cases described below, management’s assessments of the likelihood of damages, and the advice of counsel, no provisions have been made regarding the matters disclosed in this note, except as noted below. Litigation outcomes and contingencies are unpredictable, and excessive verdicts can occur. Accordingly, management’s assessments involve complex judgments about future events and often rely heavily on estimates and assumptions. Teva continuously reviews the matters described below and may, from time to time, remove previously disclosed matters thatwhere the Company hasexposures were fully resolved in the prior year, or determined to no longer meet the materiality threshold for disclosure.

disclosure, or were substantially resolved.

If one or more of such proceedings described below were to result in final judgments against Teva, such judgments could be material to its results of operations and cash flows in a given period. In addition, Teva incurs significant legal fees and related expenses in the course of defending its positions even if the facts and circumstances of a particular litigation do not give rise to a provision in the financial statements.

In connection with third-party agreements, Teva may under certain circumstances be required to indemnify, and may be indemnified by, in unspecified amounts, the parties to such agreements against third-party claims. Among other things, Teva’s agreements with third parties may require Teva to indemnify them, or require them to indemnify Teva, for the costs and damages incurred in connection with product liability claims, in specified or unspecified amounts.

Except as otherwise noted, all of the litigation matters disclosed below involve claims arising in the United States. Except as otherwise noted, all third party sales figures given below are based on IQVIA (formerly IMS Health Inc.) data.

Intellectual Property Litigation

From time to time, Teva seeks to develop generic and biosimilar versions of patent-protected pharmaceuticals and biopharmaceuticals for sale prior to patent expiration in various markets. In the United States, to obtain approval for most generics prior to the expiration of the originator’s patents, Teva must challenge the patents under the procedures set forth in the Hatch-Waxman Act of 1984, as amended. For many biosimilar products that are covered by patents, Teva participates in the “patent dance” procedures of the Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act (BPCIA), which allow for the challenge to originator patents prior to biosimilar product approval. To the extent that Teva seeks to utilize such patent challenge procedures, Teva is and expects to be involved in patent litigation regarding the validity, enforceability or infringement of the originator’s patents. Teva may also be involved in patent litigation involving the extent to which its product or manufacturing process techniques may infringe other originator or third-party patents.

Additionally, depending upon a complex analysis of a variety of legal and commercial factors, Teva may, in certain circumstances, elect to market a generic or biosimilar version even though litigation is still pending. To the extent Teva elects to proceed in this manner, it could face substantial liability for patent infringement if the final court decision is adverse to Teva, which could be material to its results of operations and cash flows in a given period.

21

Table of Contents
TEVA PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES LIMITED
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
Teva could also be sued for patent infringement outside of the context of the Hatch-Waxman Act or BPCIA. For example, Teva could be sued for patent infringement after commencing sales of a product. This type of litigation can involve any of Teva’s pharmaceutical products, not just its generic and biosimilar products.
The general rule for damages in patent infringement cases in the United States is that the patentee should be compensated by no less than a reasonable royalty and it may also be able, in certain circumstances, to be compensated for its lost profits. The amount of a reasonable royalty award would generally be calculated based on the sales of Teva’s product. The amount of lost profits would generally be based on the lost sales of the patentee’s product. In addition, the patentee may seek consequential damages as well as enhanced damages of up to three times the profits lost by the patent holder for willful infringement, although courts have typically awarded much lower multiples.

TEVA PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES LIMITED

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

Teva is also involved in litigation regarding patents in other countries where it does business, particularly in Europe, where Teva has in recent years increased the number of launches of its generic versions of branded pharmaceuticals prior to the expiration of the innovator’s patents.Europe. The laws concerning generic pharmaceuticals and patents differ from country to country. Damages for patent infringement in Europe may include lost profits or a reasonable royalty, but enhanced damages for willful infringement are generally not available.

In July 2014, GlaxoSmithKline (“GSK”) sued Teva in the District Court for the District of Delaware federal court for infringement of a patent expiring in June 2015 directed to using carvedilol in a specified manner to decrease the risk of mortality in patients with congestive heart failure. Teva and eight other generic producers began selling their carvedilol tablets (the generic version of GSK’s Coreg
®
) in September 2007. Teva vigorously disputed GSK’s claims on the merits and also disputed the amount and nature of GSK’s alleged damages. A jury trial was held and the jury returned a verdict in GSK’s favor finding Teva liable for induced infringement, including willful infringement, and assessing damages of $235.5 million, not including
pre-
or post-judgment interest. Teva filed post-trial motionsinterest or a multiplier for judgment as a matter of law askingwillfulness. Thereafter, the court to overturnjudge overturned the jury verdict, on inducement, invalidity, and the award of lost profits damages, and GSK filed post-trial motions asking the court to increase the damages amount in light of the willful infringement finding and to set the interest rate(s) to be applied to the total damages amount. On March 28, 2018, the District Court issued an opinion overturning the jury verdict and instead found no induced infringement by Teva thereby findingand that Teva did not owe any damages. The DistrictOn August 5, 2021, the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit issued a
two-to-one
decision reinstating the $235.5 million verdict and finding Teva liable for patent infringement. On February 11, 2022, the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit denied Teva’s motion seekingrehearing. Teva plans to overturn the jury verdict with respect to invalidity and denied GSK’s motion seeking to increase the damages award. GSK can appeal this decision. Ifdecision to the U.S. Supreme Court. While that appeal of the District Court’s decision is decided against Teva,pending, the case would beis remanded to the District Courtdistrict court for it to considerproceedings on Teva’s other legal and equitable defenses that have not yet been considered by the District Court. The provision that was included in the financial statements for this matter has been reversed as the exposure is no longer considered probable.

district court. In 2014, Teva Canada succeeded in its challenge of the bortezomib (the generic equivalent of Velcade®) product and mannitol ester patents under the Patented Medicines (Notice Of Compliance) Regulations (“PM(NOC)”). Teva commenced sales in the first quarter of 2015. At2021, Teva recognized a provision based on its offer to settle such matter.

In October 2016, Adapt and Emergent Biosciences Inc. (“EBSI”) sued Teva in the District Court for the District of New Jersey, asserting infringement of its patents expiring in 2035, as a result of Teva’s filing of its Abbreviated New Drug Application (“ANDA”) seeking to market a generic version of Narcan
®
nasal spray. In June 2020, the court issued a decision finding all of EBSI’s patents expiring in 2035, to be invalid. On February 10, 2022, the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed the lower court decision finding that EBSI’s patents are invalid. EBSI filed a request for rehearing by the Federal Circuit. On December 22, 2021, Teva launched its generic version of Narcan
®
nasal spray. If Teva ultimately loses the case, Teva may be ordered to cease commercial sales or donations of its generic product and/or pay damages to EBSI. Annual sales of Narcan
®
in the U.S. were approximately $434 million at the time of Teva’s launch, annual sales of Velcade were approximately 94 million Canadian dollars. Teva commenced an action under Section 8 of PM(NOC) to recover damages for being kept off of the market during the PM(NOC) proceedings. Janssen and Millennium filed a counterclaim for infringement of the same two patents as well as a patent covering a process to prepare bortezomib. The product patent expiredlaunched its generic version in October 2015; the other patents expire in January 2022 and March 2025. On December 20, 2017, Teva entered into an agreement with Janssen and Millenium which limits the damages payable by either party depending on the outcome of the infringement/impeachment action. As a result, the most Janssen and Millenium could recover is 200 million Canadian dollars (approximately $159 million) plus post-judgment interest. The trial, which is limited to the issue of patent validity and infringement, began on January 29, 2018 and concluded on March 8, 2018. The court has not yet issued any decision. In addition to the potential damages that could be awarded, if Janssen and Millenium ultimately were successful in their allegations of patent infringement, Teva could be enjoined from further sales of its bortezomib product.

2021.

Product Liability Litigation

Teva’s business inherently exposes it to potential product liability claims. Teva maintains a program of insurance, which may include commercial insurance, self-insurance (including direct risk retention), or a combination of both approaches, in amounts and on terms that it believes are reasonable and prudent in light of its business and related risks. However, Teva sells, and will continue to sell, pharmaceuticals that are not covered by its product liability insurance; in addition, it may be subject to claims for which insurance coverage is denied as well as claims that exceed its policy limits. Product liability coverage for pharmaceutical companies is becoming more expensive and increasingly difficult to obtain. As a result, Teva may not be able to obtain the type and amount of commercial insurance it desires, or any commercial insurance on reasonable terms, in all of its markets.

Teva and its subsidiaries are parties to litigation relating to previously unknown nitrosamine impurities discovered in certain products. The discovery led to a global recall of single and combination valsartan medicines around the world starting in July 2018 and to subsequent recalls on other products. The nitrosamine impurities in valsartan are allegedly found in the active pharmaceutical ingredient (“API”) supplied by multiple API manufacturers. Teva’s products allegedly at issue in the various nitrosamine-related litigations pending in the United States include valsartan, losartan, metformin
22

Table of Contents
TEVA PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES LIMITED
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
and ranitidine. There are currently two Multi-District Litigations (“MDL”) pending in the United States District Courts against Teva and numerous other manufacturers. One MDL is pending in the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey for valsartan, losartan and irbesartan. Teva is not named in complaints with respect to irbesartan. The second MDL is pending in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida for ranitidine. The lawsuits against Teva in the MDLs consist of individual personal injury and/or product liability claims and economic damages claims brought by consumers and end payors on behalf of purported classes of other consumers and end payors as well as medical monitoring class claims. Defendants’ motions to dismiss in the valsartan, losartan and irbesartan MDL were denied in part and granted in part and plaintiffs have filed amended complaints. In the ranitidine MDL, the generics manufacturers’ motions to dismiss have been granted, although certain plaintiffs have appeals pending. Teva, as well as other generic manufacturers, is also named in several state court actions asserting allegations similar to those in the ranitidine MDL and the valsartan and losartan MDL. The state court valsartan and losartan actions are pending in New Jersey and Delaware and are currently stayed. The state court ranitidine cases naming Teva are pending in California, Illinois and Pennsylvania. One ranitidine case pending in Madison County, Illinois currently has a trial date scheduled for August 2022. In addition to these MDLs, Teva has also been named in a consolidated proceeding pending in the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey brought by individuals and end payors seeking economic damages on behalf of purported classes of consumers and end payors who purchased Teva’s, as well as other generic manufacturers’ metformin products. Defendants’ motion to dismiss the plaintiffs’ amended metformin complaint from June 2021, was granted without prejudice with respect to the consumer economic loss plaintiffs and granted in part and denied in part with respect to the end payor plaintiffs. Plaintiffs were granted leave to file a second amended complaint. In June 2021, Teva was named in one personal injury metformin case seeking monetary damages, which has been removed to federal court in Florida. Teva’s motion to dismiss the Florida plaintiff’s amended complaint was granted and the Florida plaintiff was granted leave to file a second amended complaint. Similar lawsuits are pending in Canada and Germany.
Competition Matters

As part of its generic pharmaceuticals business, Teva has challenged a number of patents covering branded pharmaceuticals, some of which are among the most widely-prescribed and well-known drugs on the market. Many of Teva’s patent challenges have resulted in litigation relating to Teva’s attempts to market generic versions of such pharmaceuticals under the federal Hatch-Waxman Act. Some of this litigation has been resolved through settlement agreements in which Teva obtained a license to market a generic version of the drug, often years before the patents expire.

TEVA PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES LIMITED

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

Teva and its subsidiaries have increasingly been named as defendants in cases that allege antitrust violations arising from such settlement agreements. The plaintiffs in these cases which are usually direct and indirect purchasers of pharmaceutical products, and oftensome of whom assert claims on behalf of classes of all direct and indirect purchasers, and they typically allege that (1)(i) Teva received something of value from the innovator in exchange for an agreement to delay generic entry, and (2)(ii) significant savings could have been realized if there had been no settlement agreement and generic competition had commenced earlier. These class action casesplaintiffs seek various forms of injunctive and monetary relief, including damages based on the difference between the brand price and what the generic price allegedly would have been and disgorgement of profits, which are often automatically trebledtripled under the relevant statutes, plus attorneys’ fees and costs. The alleged damages generally depend on the size of the branded market and the length of the alleged delay, and can be substantial – substantial—potentially measured in multiples of the annual brand sales – sales—particularly where the alleged delays are lengthy or branded drugs with annual sales in the billions of dollars are involved.

Teva believes that its settlement agreements are lawful and serve to increase competition, and has defended them vigorously. In Teva’s experience to date, these cases have typically settled for a fraction of the high end of the damages sought, although there can be no assurance that such outcomes will continue.

In June 2013, the United StatesU.S. Supreme Court held, in Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) v. Actavis, Inc. (the “AndroGel case”), that a rule of reason test should be applied in analyzing whether such settlements potentially violate the federal antitrust laws. The Supreme Court held that a trial court must analyze each agreement in its entirety in order to determine whether it violates the antitrust laws. This new test has resulted in increased scrutiny of Teva’s patent settlements, additional action by the FTC and state and local authorities, and an increased risk of liability in Teva’s currently pending antitrust litigations.

In April 2006, certain subsidiaries of Teva were named in a class action lawsuit filed in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. The case alleges that the settlement agreements entered into betweenMay 2015, Cephalon Inc., now a Teva subsidiary (“Cephalon”), and various generic pharmaceutical companies in late 2005 and early 2006 to resolve patent litigation involving certain finished modafinil products (marketed as PROVIGIL®) were unlawful because they had the effect of excluding generic competition. The case also alleges that Cephalon improperly asserted its PROVIGIL patent against the generic pharmaceutical companies. The first lawsuit was brought by King Drug Company of Florence, Inc. on behalf of itself and as a proposed class action on behalf of any other person or entity that purchased PROVIGIL directly from Cephalon (the “Direct Purchaser Class”). Similar allegations were made in other complaints, including those filed on behalf of a proposed class of end payers of PROVIGIL (the “End Payer Class”), by certain individual end payers, by certain retail chain pharmacies and by Apotex, Inc. (collectively, these cases are referred to as the “Philadelphia Modafinil Action”). Separately, Apotex challenged Cephalon’s PROVIGIL patent, and in October 2011, the Court found the patent to be invalid and unenforceable based on inequitable conduct. This decision was affirmed on appeal in April 2013. Teva has either settled or reached agreements in principle to settle with all of the plaintiffs in the Philadelphia Modafinil Action. However, one of the end payers, United Healthcare Services, took the position that it is not bound by the settlement that was agreed to on its behalf and brought a separate action in Minnesota federal court, which has been transferred to the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, where Teva has also filed suit to enforce the settlement. A bench trial in the suit to enforce the settlement commenced on April 23, 2018 and concluded on April 27, 2018. The court ordered post-trial briefing to be submitted within 45 days and has not yet issued any decision.

Additionally, Cephalon and Teva have reached a settlement with 48 state attorneys general, which was approved by the court on November 7, 2016. Certain other claimants, including the State of California, have given notices of potential claims related to these settlement agreements. Teva has produced documents and information in response to discovery requests issued by the California Attorney General’s office as part of its ongoing investigation of generic competition to PROVIGIL.

In May 2015, Cephalon entered into a consent decree with the FTC (the “Modafinil Consent Decree”) under which the FTC dismissed itsantitrust claims against Cephalon in the FTC Modafinil Actionrelated to certain finished modafinil products (marketed as PROVIGIL

®
) in exchange for payment of $1.2 billion (lessset-offs for prior settlements) by Cephalon and Teva intoagreeing to, among other things, abide
23

Table of Contents
TEVA PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES LIMITED
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
by certain restrictions and limitations, for a settlement fund. Under the consent decree, Teva also agreed to certain injunctive relief with respect to the typesperiod of ten years, when entering into settlement agreements Teva may enter into to resolve patent litigation in the United States for a periodStates. Those restrictions and limitations were further refined in connection with the settlement of ten years. The settlement fund does not cover any judgments or settlements outsideother unrelated FTC antitrust lawsuits and the United States.

TEVA PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES LIMITED

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

Following an investigation initiated byterm of the Modafinil Consent Decree was extended until 2029.

In November 2020, the European Commission in April 2011 regarding a modafinil patent settlement in Europe, the Commission issued a Statement of Objectionsfinal decision in July 2017its proceedings against both Cephalon and Teva, allegingfinding that the 2005 settlement agreement between the parties had the object and effect of hindering the entry of generic modafinil.modafinil, and imposed fines totaling euro 60.5 million on Teva submitted its defenseand Cephalon. Teva and Cephalon filed an appeal against the decision in writing and an oral hearingFebruary 2021. A provision for this matter was held. No final decision regarding infringement has yet been taken by The Commission. The sales of modafinilincluded in the financial statements. Teva has provided the European Economic Area duringCommission with a bank guarantee in the last full yearamount of the alleged infringement amounted to EUR 46.5 million.

imposed fines.

In January 2009, the FTC and the State of CaliforniaAugust 2019, certain direct-purchaser plaintiffs filed a complaint for injunctive reliefclaims in California federal court in Philadelphia naming Teva and its affiliates as defendants alleging that acertain patent litigation settlement agreements relating to AndroGel
®
1% (testosterone gel) violate the antitrust laws, specifically the September 2006 patent lawsuitlitigation settlement between Watson Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (“Watson”), from which Teva later acquired certain assets and liabilities, and Solvay Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (“Solvay”Salvoy”) relating to AndroGel® 1% (testosterone gel) violated the antitrust laws. Additional lawsuits alleging similar claims were later filed by private plaintiffs (including plaintiffs purporting to represent classes of similarly situated claimants as well as direct purchaser plaintiffs filing separately), and the various actions were consolidated in a multidistrict litigation in Georgia federal court. The defendants filed various summary judgment motions on September 29, 2017,December 2011 settlement between Teva and the direct-purchaser plaintiffs moved for class certification on February 9, 2018. Both sets of motionsAbbVie. Those claims remain pending. Annual sales of AndroGel
®
1% were approximately
$350 million at the time of the earlier Watson/Solvay settlement were approximately $350 million, and annual sales of the AndroGel franchise (AndroGel® 1% and AndroGel® 1.62%) were approximately $140 million and $1.05 billion, respectively, at the time Actavis launched its generic version of AndroGel
® 1%
1
% in November 2015.

A provision for these matters and related litigations in Georgia that have since been settled was included in the financial statements.

In December 2011, three groups of plaintiffs sued Wyeth and Teva for alleged violations of the antitrust laws in connection with their November 2005 settlement of patent litigation involving extended release venlafaxine (generic Effexor XR
® XR) entered into in November 2005.
). The cases were filed by a purported class of direct purchasers, by a purported class of indirect purchasers and by certain chain pharmacies in the United StatesU.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey. The plaintiffs claim that the settlement agreement between Wyeth and Teva unlawfully delayed generic entry. In October 2014, the court granted Teva’s motion to dismiss in the direct purchaser cases, after which the parties agreed that the court’s reasoning applied equally to the indirect purchaser cases. Plaintiffs appealed, and on August 21, 2017, the Third Circuit reversedMarch 2020, the district court’s decisioncourt temporarily stayed discovery and remanded for further proceedings. On November 20, 2017, Tevareferred the case to mediation, and Wyeth filed a petition for a writ of certiorari in the United States Supreme Court. That petition was denied on February 20, 2018, and litigation has resumed before the district court.discovery remains stayed. Annual sales of Effexor XR
® XR
were approximately $2.6
$2.6 billion at the time of settlement and at the time Teva launched its generic versions were launched version of Effexor XR
®
in July 2010.

In February 2012, two purported classes of direct-purchaser plaintiffs sued GSK and Teva in New Jersey federal court for alleged violations of the antitrust laws in connection with their settlement of patent litigation involving lamotrigine (generic Lamictal
®
) entered into in February 2005. The plaintiffs claim that the settlement agreement unlawfully delayed generic entry and seek unspecified damages. In December 2012,On April 9, 2021, the district court, dismissedwhich had previously granted an initial motion for class certification by the case. In January 2014,direct purchaser plaintiffs but was reversed on that ruling by the courtThird Circuit in April 2020, denied the direct purchaser plaintiffs’ renewed motion for reconsideration and affirmed its original dismissal. In June 2015,class certification. Plaintiffs thereafter sought leave to file a supplemental expert report in an effort to show that they could still meet the Third Circuit reversed and remanded for further proceedings. On February 19, 2016, Teva and GSK filed a petition for a writclass certification standard on certain of certiorari in the United States Supreme Court, which was deniedtheir claims, but on November 7, 2016. In the meantime, litigation has resumed beforeJanuary 21, 2022, the district court.court denied that request in full, and on April 21, 2022, the court entered a schedule for additional briefing on the remaining class certification issues. Annual sales of Lamictal
®
were
approximately $950 million at the time of the settlement and approximately $2.3 billion at the time Teva launched its generic competition commenced version of Lamictal
®
in July 2008.

TEVA PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES LIMITED

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

In April 2013, purported classes of direct purchasers of, and end payers for, Niaspan
® (extended
(extended release niacin) sued Teva and Abbott for violating the antitrust laws by entering into a settlement agreement in April 2005, to resolve patent litigation over the product. A multidistrict litigation has been established in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. Throughout 2015 and in January 2016, several individual direct purchaserdirect-purchaser
opt-out
plaintiffs filed complaints with allegations nearly identical to those of the direct purchaserpurchasers’ class. In August 2019, the district court certified the direct-purchaser class, but in June 2020, the court denied the indirect purchasers’ motion for class certification without prejudice. On September 4, 2020, the indirect purchasers filed a renewed motion for class certification, which was subsequently denied with prejudice by the district court and is now on appeal before the Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit. In October 2016, the District Attorney for Orange County, California, filed a similar complaint which has since been amended, in California state court, alleging violations of state law. Further proceedings in the California action have been stayed pending resolution of Defendants’ petition for writ of mandate or prohibition filed with the Court of Appeal, Fourth Appellate District, which seeks an order vacating the Superior Court’s denial of Defendants’ motion to strike all claims forlaw and seeking restitution and civil penalties to the extent they are not limited to alleged activity in Orange County.penalties. Annual sales of Niaspan
®
were approximately $416 million at the time of the settlement and approximately $1.1 billion at the time generic competition commenced in September 2013.

In November 2013, a putative class action was filed in Pennsylvania federal court against Actavis, Inc. and certain of its affiliates, alleging that Watson’s 2012 patent lawsuit settlement with Endo Pharmaceuticals Inc. relating to Lidoderm® (lidocaine transdermal patches) violated the antitrust laws. Additional lawsuits containing similar allegations followed on behalf of other classes of putative direct purchaser andend-payer plaintiffs, as well as retailers acting in their individual capacities, and those cases were consolidated as a multidistrict litigation in federal court in California. On February 21, 2017, the court granted both the indirect purchaser plaintiffs’ and the direct purchaser plaintiffs’ motions for class certification. We reached an agreement to settle the multidistrict litigation with the various plaintiff groups in the first quarter of 2018. A provision for these settlements has been included in the financial statements, and on March 20, 2018, the direct purchaser andend-payor plaintiffs moved the court to preliminarily approve their respective settlements. The FTC has also filed suit to challenge the Lidoderm® settlement, initially bringing antitrust claims against Watson, Endo, and Allergan in Pennsylvania federal court in March 2016, and then later voluntarily dismissing those claims andre-filing them along with a stipulated order for permanent injunction, to settle its claims against Endo in the same California federal court in which the private multidistrict litigation referenced above was pending. On February 3, 2017, the State of California filed a complaint against Allergan and Watson, and that complaint was also assigned to the California court presiding over the multidistrict litigation. After the FTC dismissed its claims in Pennsylvania, but before itre-filed them in California, Watson and Allergan filed suit against the FTC in the same Pennsylvania federal court where the agency had initially brought its lawsuit, seeking a declaratory judgment that the FTC’s claims are not authorized by statute, or, in the alternative, that the FTC does not have statutory authority to pursue a disgorgement remedy. That declaratory judgment action remains pending, and the court in California has stayed both the FTC’s claims and the State of California’s claims against Allergan and Watson, pending the outcome of the declaratory judgment action in Pennsylvania. Annual sales of Lidoderm® at the time of the settlement were approximately $1.2 billion, and were approximately $1.4 billion at the time ActavisTeva launched its generic version of Niaspan

®
in September 2013.

Since November 2013, numerous lawsuits have been filed in various federal courts by purported classes of end payers for, and direct purchasers of, Aggrenox® (dipyridamole/aspirin tablets) against Boehringer Ingelheim (“BI”), the innovator, and several Teva subsidiaries. The lawsuits allege, among other things, that the settlement agreement between BI and Barr entered into in August 2008 violated the antitrust laws. A multidistrict litigation has been established in the U.S. District Court for the District of Connecticut. Teva and BI’s motion to dismiss was denied in March 2015. On April 11, 2017, the Orange County District Attorney filed a complaint for violations of California’s Unfair Competition Law based on the Aggrenox® patent litigation settlement. Annual sales of Aggrenox® were approximately $340 million at the time of the settlement and approximately $455 million at the time generic competition began in July 2015. Teva has settled with the putative class of direct purchasers and theopt-out direct purchaser plaintiffs. Additionally, on January 8, 2018, Teva reached an agreement to settle with the end payer class plaintiffs, and subsequently settled with two of theopt-out end payer plaintiffs, Humana and Blue Cross/Blue Shield of Louisiana. The settlement with the end payer class was preliminarily approved by the court on March 6, 2018. A provision has been included in the financial statements for this matter.

Since January 2014, numerous lawsuits have been filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York by purported classes of end payers
end-payers
for, and direct purchasersdirect-purchasers of, Actos
®
and Acto plusActoplus Met® (pioglitazone and pioglitazone plus metformin) against Takeda, the innovator, and several generic manufacturers, including Teva, Actavis and Watson.

TEVA PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES LIMITED

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

The lawsuits allege, among other things, that the settlement agreements between Takeda and the generic

24

Table of Contents
TEVA PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES LIMITED
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
manufacturers (including Takeda’s December 2010 settlement agreement with Teva) violated the antitrust laws. The Courtcourt dismissed the end payer
end-payers’
lawsuits against all defendants in September 2015. In October 2015, the end payers appealed that ruling, and on March 22, 2016, a stipulation was filed dismissing Teva and the other generic defendants from the appeal. On February 8, 2017, the Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit affirmed the dismissal in part and vacated and remanded the dismissal in part with respect to the claims against Takeda. The direct purchasers’ case had been stayed pending resolution of the appeal in the end payer matter and the direct purchasers amended their complaint for a second time afterfollowing the Second Circuit’s decision. Defendants had moved to dismissdecision, but on October 8, 2019, the district court dismissed, with prejudice, the direct purchasers’ original complaintclaims against the generic manufacturers (including Teva, Actavis, and supplemental briefing on that motion based on the new allegations in the amended complaint was completed on June 29, 2017. The court has not yet issued its decision.Watson). At the time of theTeva’s settlement, annual sales of Actos
®
and Actoplus Met were approximately $3.7 billion and annual sales of ACTO plus Met® were approximately $500 million.million, respectively. At the time Teva launched its authorized generic competition commencedversion of Actos
®
and Actoplus Met in August 2012, annual sales of Actos
®
and Actoplus Met were approximately $2.8 billion and annual sales of ACTO plus Met® were approximately $430 million.

In June 2014, two groupsmillion, respectively.

Putative classes of end payers sued AstraZenecadirect-purchaser and Teva, as well as Ranbaxy and Dr. Reddy’s,
end-payer
plaintiffs have filed antitrust lawsuits (which have since been coordinated in the Philadelphia Court of Common Pleas for violating the antitrust laws by entering into settlement agreements to resolve the esomeprazole (generic Nexium®) patent litigation (the “Philadelphia Esomeprazole Actions”). These end payers had opted out of a class action that was filed in the Massachusetts federal court in September 2012 and resulted in a jury verdict in December 2014 in favor of AstraZeneca and Ranbaxy (the “Massachusetts Action”). Prior to the jury verdict, Teva settled with all plaintiffs in the Massachusetts Action for $24 million. The allegations in the Philadelphia Esomeprazole Actions are nearly identical to those in the Massachusetts Action. The Philadelphia Esomeprazole Actions were stayed pending resolution of the Massachusetts Action, which was on appeal to the First Circuit with respect to the claimsDelaware) against thenon-settling defendants AstraZeneca and Ranbaxy. On November 21, 2016, the First Circuit affirmed the district court’s judgment in favor of AstraZeneca and Ranbaxy, and the plaintiffs’ petitions for rehearing and rehearing en banc were denied on January 10, 2017.

In September 2014, the FTC sued AbbVie Inc. and certain of its affiliates (“AbbVie”)Amgen and Teva in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania alleging that they violated the antitrust laws when they entered into aJanuary 2, 2019 settlement agreement to resolve the AndroGel®between Amgen and Teva, resolving patent litigation and a supply agreement under which AbbVie would supply authorized generic product for TriCorover cinacalcet (generic Sensipar

® to Teva. The FTC alleges that Teva agreed to delay the entry of its generic testosterone gel product in exchange for entering into the TriCor supply agreement. In May 2015, the court granted Teva’s motion to dismiss the FTC’s claim as to Teva. The FTC’s motions for reconsideration and for entry of partial final judgment to permit an immediate appeal were denied, so the FTC cannot appeal the dismissal until its claims against AbbVie are resolved. The Court granted the FTC’s summary judgment motion that AbbVie’s patent infringement lawsuit against Teva in the AndroGel patent litigation was objectively baseless. A bench trial for the FTC’s case against AbbVie began in February 2018 and concluded in April 2018. The court has not yet issued its decision.

Since May 2015, two lawsuits have been filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York by a purported class of direct purchasers of, and a purported class of end payers for, Namenda IR® (memantine hydrochloride) against Forest Laboratories, LLC (“Forest”

) and Actavis PLC, the innovator, and several generic manufacturers, including Teva. Teva is only a defendant in the end payer case and defendants moved to dismiss the claims made by the end payers. The lawsuits allege, among other things, that the settlement agreements between Forest and the generic manufacturers (including Forest’s November 2009 settlement agreement with Teva), violated the antitrust laws. On September 13, 2016,November 30, 2020, the district court denied defendants’ motionsTeva’s motion to dismiss but stayedin part, and on February 16, 2021, plaintiffs filed amended complaints. On March 30, 2021, Teva again moved to dismiss those claims based on plaintiffs’ failure to allege both that the cases with respectsettlement violated the antitrust laws and that the settlement caused any actual injury to plaintiffs. On March 11, 2022, the claims brought under state law, which aredistrict court denied Teva’s motion to dismiss in part. Teva intends to request that the only claims asserted against Teva.district court certify its rulings for review by the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit. Annual sales of Namenda IRSensipar
®
in the United States were approximately $1.4 billion at the time Teva launched its generic version of Sensipar
®
in December 2018, and at the time of the settlement were approximately $1.1 billion, and are currently approximately $1.4 billion.

January 2, 2019 settlement.

On March 8, 2016 and April 11, 2016, certain Actavis subsidiaries in the United Kingdom, including Auden Mckenzie Holdings Limited, received notices fromJuly 15, 2021, the U.K. Competition and Markets Authority (“CMA”) that it had launched formal investigations under Section 25 of the Competition Act of 1998 (“Competition Act”) into suspectedissued a decision imposing fines for breaches of U.K. competition law by Allergan, Actavis UK and Auden Mckenzie and a number of other companies in connection with the supply of 10mg and 20mg hydrocortisone tablets. On December 16, 2016,tablets in the CMA issued a statementU.K. The decision combines the CMA’s three prior investigations into the supply of hydrocortisone tablets in the U.K. and encompasses those allegations which were subject to prior statements of objections (a provisional finding of infringementbreach of the Competition Act), in respectparticular those under case
50277-1
(unfair pricing, originally subject to a statement of certain allegations against Actavis UK and Allergan, which was later reissuedobjections on December 16, 2016), case
50277-2
(anti-competitive agreement with AMCo, originally subject to include certain Auden Mckenzie entities.

TEVA PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES LIMITED

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

A response was submitted and an oral hearing was held. On December 18, 2017, the CMA issued a Statementstatement of Draft Penalty Calculation. A response was submitted and an oral hearing was held. No final decision regarding infringement of competition law has yet been issued by the CMA. Onobjections on March 3, 2017,2017) as well as the CMA issued a second statement of objection in respect of certain additional allegations (relatingCMA’s subsequent investigation relating to the same products and covering part of the same time period as for the first statement of objections) against Actavis UK, Allergan, and a number of other companies, which was later reissued to include certain Auden Mckenzie entities. A response was submitted and an oral hearing was held.anti-competitive agreement with Waymade. On January 9, 2017, Teva completed the sale of Actavis UK to Accord Healthcare Limited, pursuant toin connection with which Teva will indemnify Accord Healthcare for potential fines imposed by the CMA and/or damages awarded by a court onagainst Actavis UK as a resultin relation to the December 16, 2016 and March 3, 2017 statements of the investigations in respect ofobjections, and resulting from conduct prior to the closing date of the sale. In addition, Teva agreed to indemnify Allergan against losses arising from this matter in the event of any such fines or damages,damages. On October 6, 2021, Accord UK and Auden Mckenzie appealed the CMA’s decision. A provision for the estimated exposure for Teva expectsrelated to assert claims, including claims for breach of warranty, against the sellers of Auden Mckenzie. The terms of the purchase agreement may preclude a full recovery by Teva. A liability for this matterfines and/or damages has been recorded in purchase accounting relatedthe financial statements.

In March 2021, following the 2019 European Commission’s inspection of Teva and subsequent request for information, the European Commission opened a formal antitrust investigation to assess whether Teva may have abused a dominant position by delaying the acquisitionmarket entry and uptake of Actavis Generics. Furthermedicines that compete with COPAXONE. Annual sales of COPAXONE in the European Economic Area for 2021 were approximately $373 million.
Between September 1, 2020 and December 20, 2020, separate plaintiffs purporting to our Master Purchase Agreement with Allergan whereby Teva agreed to indemnify Allergan for liabilities related to acquired assets, Teva agreed with Allergan to settle and release Teva’s indemnity claim and Allergan’s potential losses arising from the CMA in connection with this matter, pursuant to the agreement the parties entered into on January 31, 2018. See note 3.

In November 2016, three putative indirect purchaser class actions were filed in federal courts in Wisconsin, Massachusetts and Florida against Shire U.S., Inc. and Shire LLC (collectively, “Shire”) and Actavis, alleging that Shire’s 2013 patent litigation settlement with Actavis related to the ADHD drug Intuniv® (guanfacine) violated various state consumer protection and antitrust laws. On December 30, 2016 and January 11, 2017, two additional similar actions were filed, also in Massachusetts federal court, against Shire and Actavis or Teva (as successor to Actavis) byrepresent putative classes of direct purchaser plaintiffs. All fiveand indirect purchasers and

opt-out
retailer purchasers of Bystolic
®
(nebivolol hydrochloride) filed separate complaints in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York against several generic manufacturers, including Teva, Actavis, and Watson, alleging, among other things, that the settlement agreements these generic manufacturers entered into with Forest Laboratories, Inc., the innovator, to resolve patent litigation over Bystolic
®
violated the antitrust laws. The cases are now in Massachusetts federal court,were coordinated and on March 10, 2017, both the indirect purchaser plaintiffs and the direct purchaser15, 2021, plaintiffs filed consolidated amended complaints.complaints, which Teva, Actavis, and Watson moved to dismiss. On January 24, 2022, the court dismissed plaintiffs’ amended complaints without prejudice. Plaintiffs filed amended complaints on February 22, 2022, which defendants moved to dismiss on April 19, 2022 and those motions remain pending. Annual sales of IntunivBystolic
®
in the United States were approximately $335$700 million at the time of Watson’s 2013 settlement with Forest.
In February 2021, the State of New Mexico filed a lawsuit against Teva and certain other defendants related to various medicines used to treat HIV. Between September and December 2021, several private plaintiffs including retailers and health insurance providers filed similar claims in federal court in the Northern District of California and in the District of Minnesota. As
25

Table of Contents
TEVA PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES LIMITED
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
they relate to Teva, the lawsuits challenge settlement agreements Teva entered into with Gilead in 2013 and 2014 to resolve patent litigation relating to Teva’s generic versions of Viread
®
, Truvada
®
, and Atripla
®
. Plaintiffs allege that the settlements contain improper reverse payments that delayed the availability of Teva’s generic products, in violation of the federal antitrust laws and state law. Several recently filed cases are in the process of being coordinated with the existing litigation in the Northern District of California, and any effect those cases may have on the overall case schedule remains unclear. On February 16, 2022, Teva moved to dismiss the claims by certain private plaintiffs but that motion was denied. However, Teva has successfully moved to limit the potential damages period as to certain private plaintiffs. On August 5, 2021, Teva moved to dismiss the complaint brought by the State of New Mexico, and on December 20, 2021, the trial court denied Teva’s motion. The trial court certified the decision as appropriate for interlocutory appeal, but on April 8, 2022, the appellate court in New Mexico declined to accept the appeal and remanded back to the trial court. Annual sales in the United States at the time of the settlement of Viread
®
, Truvada
®
and
Atripla
®
were approximately $582 million, $2.4 billion, and $2.9 billion, respectively. Annual sales in the United States at the time Teva launched its generic version of Viread
®
in 2017, Truvada
®
in 2020 and Atripla
®
in 2020 were approximately $728 million, $2.1 billion and $444 million, respectively.
In August 2021, a plaintiff filed a putative class action suit in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania against Takeda and several generic manufacturers, including Watson and Teva, alleging violations of the antitrust laws in connection with their settlement of patent litigation involving colchicine tablets (generic Colcrys
®
), entered into in January 2016. Plaintiff claims that the settlement was part of a horizontal conspiracy among Takeda and the generic manufacturers to unlawfully restrict output of colchicine by delaying generic entry. Defendants moved to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a claim. On December 28, 2021, the Court granted the defendants’ motion to dismiss, finding that plaintiff’s allegations were implausible, but granted plaintiff leave to amend, and on January 18, 2022, plaintiff filed its amended complaint, making substantively the same antitrust allegations as before, but with certain new allegations regarding the nature of the alleged conspiracy. On March 30, 2022, the Court granted in part and denied in part defendants’ motion to dismiss, dismissing the newly pled bilateral conspiracy claims but allowing the revised overarching conspiracy claim to proceed against all defendants. On April 8, 2022, Teva and Watson, along with their codefendant Amneal, moved the court to reconsider its partial
motion-to-dismiss
denial or, in the alternative, to certify that denial for immediate appellate review. However, that motion was denied on April 25, 2022. Annual sales of Colcrys
®
in the United States were approximately $
187 million at the time of the settlement, and approximately $327 million at the time generic competition began in 2014.

settlement.

Government Investigations and Litigation Relating to Pricing and Marketing

Teva is involved in government investigations and litigation arising from the marketing and promotion of its pharmaceutical products in the United States. Many of these investigations originate through what are known asqui tam complaints, in which the government reviews a complaint filed under seal by a whistleblower (a “relator”) that alleges violations of the federal False Claims Act. The government considers whether to investigate the allegations
In 2015 and will, in many cases, issue2016, Actavis and Teva USA each respectively received subpoenas requesting documents and other information, including conducting witness interviews. The government must decide whether to intervene and pursue theclaims as the plaintiff. Once a decision is made by the government, the complaint is unsealed. If the government decides not to intervene, then the relator may decide to pursue the lawsuit on his own without the active participation of the government.

A number of state attorneys general have filed various actions against Teva and/or certain of its subsidiaries, including certain Actavis subsidiaries, relating to reimbursements or drug price reporting under Medicaid or other programs. Such price reporting is alleged to have caused governments and others to pay inflated reimbursements for covered drugs. Teva and its subsidiaries have reached settlements in most of these cases, and remain parties to active litigation in Illinois. The Actavis subsidiaries remain parties to active litigation in Illinois and Utah. A provision for the cases has been included in the financial statements. Trial in the Illinois case against Teva concluded in the fourth quarter of 2013, and post-trial briefing was submitted. On June 28, 2017, after several years, the court issued a Memorandum Order After Trial finding liability against Teva, but reserved its decision on damages. Teva denies any liability and sought reconsideration of the order, which was denied. A hearing on damages is scheduled for August 8, 2018. The State of Illinois is seeking approximately $90 million in compensatory damages. Any such damages ultimately awarded by the court are subject to automatic trebling. In addition, the state is seeking statutory penalties ranging from $362 million to approximately $1.2 billion. Teva will continue to argue that any damages and penalties should be significantly less than the amount sought by the state. In August 2013, in the Mississippi case against Watson, the court ruled in favor of the state, awarding $12.4 million in compensatory damages and civil penalties. In March 2014, the court awarded the state an additional $17.9 million in punitive damages. A provision for these amounts has been included in the financial statements. Watson appealed both the original and the punitive damage awards. On January 11, 2018, the Mississippi Supreme Court affirmed the judgment in favor of the State of Mississippi and against Watson in all respects.

TEVA PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES LIMITED

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

On February 9, 2018, the judgment was fully satisfied and on February 16, 2018, the trial court discharged the appeal bond fully concluding this matter. In Utah, claims against Watson that were dismissed in their entirety by the trial court are now on appeal.

Severalqui tam complaints have been unsealed in recent years as a result of government decisions not to participate in the cases. The following is a summary of certain government investigations, qui tam actions and related matters.

In January 2014, Teva received a civil investigative demand from the U.S. Attorney for the Southern DistrictDepartment of New York seeking documents and information from January 1, 2006 related to sales, marketing and promotion of COPAXONE and AZILECT, focusing on educational and speaker programs. The demand states that the government is investigating possible civil violations of the federal False Claims Act. In March 2015, the docket in this matter and a False Claims Act civil qui tam complaint concerning this matter were unsealed by the court, which revealed that the U.S. Attorney had notified the court in November 2014 that it had declined to intervene in and proceed with the lawsuit. The qui tam relators, however, are moving forward with the lawsuit. In June 2015, Teva filed motions to dismiss the complaint. In February 2016, the court stayed its decision on the relators’ claims based on state and local laws, denied Teva’s motions to dismiss the False Claims Act claims, and instructed the relators to amend their complaint with additional information. In March 2016, the relators filed an amended complaint, which Teva answered in April 2016. The parties are currently engaged in discovery.

Beginning in May 2014 various complaints have been filed with respect to opioid sales and distribution against various Teva affiliates, along with several other pharmaceutical companies, by a number of cities, counties, states and agencies across the country. There are actions currently pending against Teva and its affiliates that have been brought by various states, subdivisions and state agencies in both State and Federal Courts. Most of the Federal cases have been consolidated into a multidistrict litigation in the Northern District of Ohio. In addition to the complaints filed by states, state agencies and political subdivisions, private class action lawsuits have been filed in Arkansas, Massachusetts, Ohio and Pennsylvania. Several counties in various states and the State of Delaware have commenced an action against Anda, Inc. (and other distributor and manufacturer defendants) alleging that Anda, Inc. failed to develop and implement systems sufficient to identify suspicious orders of opioid products and prevent the diversion of such products to individuals who used them for other than legitimate medical purposes. The complaints, asserting claims under similar provisions of different state law, generally contend that the defendants allegedly engaged in improper marketing and distribution of opioids, including ACTIQ® and FENTORA and seek a variety of remedies, including restitution, civil penalties, disgorgement of profits, treble damages, attorneys’ fees and injunctive relief. None of the complaints specifies the exact amount of damages at issue. Teva and its affiliates that are defendants in the various lawsuits deny all allegations asserted in these complaints and have filed or will be filing motions to dismiss where possible. On April 11, 2018, the judge in the multidistrict litigation issued a case management order setting the first trial for March 2019. On April 27, 2018, Teva received subpoena requests from the DOJ seeking documents relating to the manufacture, marketing and sale of opioids. Teva intends to comply with this subpoena. In addition, a number of State Attorneys General, including a coordinated multistate effort, have initiated investigations into sales and marketing practices of Teva and its affiliates with respect to opioids. Teva is cooperating with these investigations, which are ongoing, and cannot predict at this time the outcome.

On June 21, 2016, Teva USA received a subpoena from theJustice (“DOJ”) Antitrust Division of the DOJ seeking documents and other information relating to the marketing and pricing of certain of Teva USA’sUSA generic products and communications with competitors about such products. ActavisOn August 25, 2020, a federal grand jury in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania returned a three count indictment charging Teva USA with criminal felony Sherman Act violations. See

No. 20-cr-200
(E.D. Pa.). The indictment alleges Teva USA participated in a conspiracy with certain other generic drug manufacturers to maintain and fix prices, allocate customers, and other alleged antitrust offenses concerning the sale of generic drugs. The indictment identified the following generic drugs: Pravastatin, Carbamazepine, Clotrimazole, Etodolac (IR and ER), Fluocinonide (Cream
E-Cream,
Gel, and Ointment), Warfarin, Nadolol, Temozolomide, and Tobramycin. On September 8, 2020, Teva USA pled not guilty to all counts. A tentative trial date is yet to be scheduled. While the Company is unable to estimate a range of loss at this time, a conviction on these criminal charges could have a material adverse impact on the Company’s business, including monetary penalties and debarment from federally funded health care programs.
In May 2018, Teva received a similar subpoenacivil investigative demand from the DOJ Civil Division, pursuant to the federal False Claims Act, seeking documents and information produced since January 1, 2009 relevant to the Civil Division’s investigation concerning allegations that generic pharmaceutical manufacturers, including Teva, engaged in June 2015. On July 12,market allocation and price-fixing agreements, paid illegal remuneration, and caused false claims to be submitted in violation of the False Claims Act. An adverse resolution of this matter may include fines, penalties, financial forfeiture and compliance conditions.
26

Table of Contents
TEVA PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES LIMITED
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
In 2015 and 2016, Actavis and Teva USA each respectively received a subpoena from the Connecticut Attorney General seeking documents and other information relating to potential state antitrust law violations. Actavis has also received a similar subpoena from the Connecticut Attorney General. Teva and Actavis are cooperating fully with these subpoenas.

OnSubsequently, on December 15, 2016, a civil action was brought by the attorneys general of twenty states against Teva USA and several other companies asserting claims under federal antitrust law (specifically, section 1 of the Sherman Act) alleging price fixing of generic products in the United States. AnThat complaint was later amended to add new states as named plaintiffs, as well as new allegations and new state law claims, and on June 18, 2018, the attorneys general of 49 states plus Puerto Rico and the District of Columbia filed a consolidated amended complaint against Actavis and Teva, as well as other companies and individuals. On May 10, 2019, most (though not all) of these attorneys general filed another antitrust complaint against Actavis, Teva and other companies and individuals, alleging price-fixing and market allocation with respect to additional generic products. On November 1, 2019, the state attorneys general filed an amended complaint, bringing the total number of plaintiff states and territories to 54. The amended complaint alleges that Teva was at the center of a conspiracy in the generic pharmaceutical industry, and asserts that Teva and others fixed prices, rigged bids, and allocated customers and market share with respect to certain additional products. On June 10, 2020, most, but not all, of the same states, with the addition of the U.S. Virgin Islands, filed on March 1, 2017 adding twenty additional statesa third complaint in the District of Connecticut naming, among other defendants, Actavis, but not Teva USA, in a similar complaint relating to dermatological generics products. On September 9, 2021, the named plaintiffs and adding supplemental state law claims.

TEVA PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES LIMITED

Notesstates’ attorneys general amended their third complaint to, Consolidated Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

Theamong other things, add California as a plaintiff. In the various complaints described above, the states seek a finding that the defendants’ actions violated federal antitrust law and state antitrust and consumer protection laws, as well as injunctive relief, disgorgement, damages on behalf of various state and governmental entities and consumers, civil penalties and costs. On August 3, 2017, the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation (“JPML”) transferred this action to the generic drug multidistrict litigation pending in federal court in Pennsylvania, which is discussed in greater detail below. On July 17, 2017, a new complaint was filed in the District Court of Connecticut on behalf of four additional states – Arkansas, Missouri, New Mexico and West Virginia, as well as the District of Columbia. These plaintiffs were not previously party to the State Attorney General action that commenced in December 2016. This complaint, which the JPML has alsoAll such complaints have been transferred to the generic drug multidistrict litigation discussed below, makes the same factual allegations and claims that are at issue in the earlier State Attorneys General complaint. On October 31, 2017 the attorneys general of 45 states plus Puerto Rico and theEastern District of Columbia filed a motion for leave to file anPennsylvania (“Pennsylvania MDL”). On July 13, 2020, the court overseeing the Pennsylvania MDL chose the attorneys’ general November 1, 2019 amended complaint, referenced above, along with certain complaints filed by private plaintiffs, to proceed first in this action. The proposedthe litigation as bellwether complaints. Teva moved the court to reconsider that ruling. On February 9, 2021, Teva’s motion to reconsider that ruling was granted, and on May 7, 2021, the Court chose the attorneys’ general third complaint filed on June 10, 2020 and subsequently amended complaint names Actavisto serve as a defendantbellwether complaint in the Pennsylvania MDL, along with certain complaints filed by private plaintiffs. Teva settled with the State of Mississippi for $925,000 in June 2021 and with the State of Louisiana for $1,450,000 in March 2022. Pursuant to these settlements, both states have dismissed their claims against Actavis and Teva USA, as well as certain former employees of Actavis and Teva and adds new allegations and claims to those appearingUSA. On December 9, 2021, the Court entered an order setting the schedule for the proceedings in the prior complaints. Defendants have opposedbellwether cases. The order did not include trial dates, but provides for the motion.

parties to complete briefing on motions for summary judgement in early 2024.

Beginning on March 2, 2016, and continuing through December 2020, numerous complaints have been filed in the United States on behalf of putative classes of direct and indirect purchasers of several generic drug products, as well as several individual direct and indirect purchaser
opt-out
plaintiffs. These complaints, which allege that the defendants engaged in conspiracies to fix increase, maintainprices and/or stabilize the pricesallocate market share of the generic drug products named, have been brought against various manufacturer defendants, including among others, Teva USA Actavis Holdco U.S., Inc., Actavis Elizabeth and Pliva, Inc.Actavis. The plaintiffs generally seek injunctive relief and damages under federal antitrust law, and damages under various state laws. On April 6, 2017, the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation (JPML) entered an order transferring cases brought by classes of direct or indirect purchasers and alleging claims of generic price-fixing for coordination or consolidation with the multidistrict litigation currently pending in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania; the panel subsequently transferred further cases to that court, and the plaintiffs filed consolidated amended complaints on August 15, 2017. Defendants moved to dismiss certain of those consolidated amended complaints on October 6, 2017. In February16, 2018, the court overseeingdenied certain of the multidistrict litigation lifteddefendants’ motions to dismiss as to certain federal claims, pending as of that date, and on February 15, 2019, the staycourt granted in part and denied in part defendants’ motions to dismiss as to certain state law claims. On July 18, 2019, May 6, 2020 and October 8, 2021, certain individual plaintiffs commenced civil actions in the Pennsylvania Court of discovery on a limited basisCommon Pleas of Philadelphia County against many of the defendants in the Pennsylvania MDL, including Teva and Actavis, but no complaints have been filed in the actions and each of the three of the cases have been placed in deferred status. Certain counties in New York and Texas have also commenced civil actions against many of the defendants in the Pennsylvania MDL, including Teva and Actavis, and the complaints have been transferred to allow for document discovery andnon-merits based depositions. Teva denies havingthe Pennsylvania MDL. There is also one similar complaint brought in Canada, which alleges that the defendants engaged in any conduct that would give riseconspiracies to liability with respectfix prices and/or allocate market share of generic drug products to the above-mentioned subpoenas and civil suits.

Ondetriment of a class of private payors. The action is in its early stages.

In March 21, 2017, Teva received a subpoena from the U.S. Attorney’s office in Boston, Massachusetts requesting documents related to Teva’s donations to patient assistance programs. Teva is cooperating fullySubsequently, in responding to the subpoena.

For several years, Teva had conducted a voluntary worldwide investigation into business practices that may have implications underAugust 2020, the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (“FCPA”), following the receipt, beginningAttorney’s office in 2012, of subpoenas and informal document requests from the SEC and the DOJ with respect to compliance with the FCPA in certain countries. In December 2016, Teva reachedBoston, Massachusetts brought a resolution with the SEC and DOJ to fully resolve these FCPA matters. The resolution, which relates to conduct in Russia, Mexico and Ukraine from 2007 to 2013, provides for penalties of approximately $519 million (reservedcivil action in the financial statements inU.S. District Court for the third quarterDistrict of 2016), which includes a fine, disgorgement and prejudgment interest; a three-year deferred prosecution agreement for Teva; a guilty plea by Teva’s Russian subsidiary to criminal charges ofMassachusetts alleging violations of the anti-bribery provisionsfederal Anti-Kickback Statute, and asserting causes of action under the FCPA; consentfederal False Claims Act and state law. It is alleged that Teva caused the submission of false claims to entryMedicare through Teva’s donations to bona fide independent charities that provide financial assistance to patients. An adverse judgment may involve damages, civil penalties and injunctive remedies. On October 19, 2020, Teva filed a motion to dismiss the complaint on the grounds that

27

Table of a final judgment against Teva settling civil claims of violations of the anti-bribery, internal controls and books and records provisions of the FCPA; and the retention of an independent compliance monitor for a period of three years. The SEC civil consent and DOJ deferred prosecution agreement have each obtained court approval.

Following the resolution, Teva has had requests for documents and information from various Russian government entities. In December 2016, Teva was informed by Israeli authorities that they had initiated an investigation into the conduct that was the subject of the FCPA investigation and which resulted in the above-mentioned resolution with the SEC and DOJ. On January 14, 2018, Teva and the Government of Israel entered into an arrangement for the Contingent Cessation of Proceedings pursuant to the Israeli Securities Law that ends the investigation into such conduct against the Company and provides for a payment of 75 million New Israeli Shekels (approximately $22 million).

Contents

TEVA PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES LIMITED

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

it fails to state a claim. On September 10, 2021, the Court granted Teva’s motion to dismiss the unjust enrichment claim and denied the remainder of the motion. On October 15, 2021, Teva filed an answer to the complaint. The proceeding is in early stages. Additionally, on January 8, 2021, Humana, Inc. filed an action against Teva in the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida based on the allegations raised in the August 2020 complaint filed by the U.S. Attorney’s Office in Boston. On April 2, 2021, Teva filed a motion to dismiss the claims on the grounds that the claims are time-barred and/or insufficiently pled, and that motion remains pending.
In April 2021, a city and county in Washington sued Teva in the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington for alleged violations of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act, Washington’s Consumer Protection Act, and unjust enrichment concerning Teva’s sale of COPAXONE. Plaintiffs purport to represent a nationwide class of health plans and a subclass of Washington-based health plans that purchased and/or reimbursed health plan members for COPAXONE. Plaintiffs allege that Teva engaged in several fraudulent schemes that resulted in plaintiffs and the putative class members purchasing and/or reimbursing plan members for additional prescriptions of COPAXONE and/or at inflated COPAXONE prices. Plaintiffs seek treble damages for the excess reimbursements and inflated costs, as well as injunctive relief. On September 28, 2021, plaintiffs filed an amended complaint. On November 17, 2021, Teva moved to dismiss the suit, on the grounds that plaintiffs’ claims are barred by the applicable statutes of limitations and the direct purchaser rule, suffer from jurisdictional defects, and fail to plausibly allege fraud or other elements of their claims. That motion remains pending.
On June 29, 2021, Mylan Pharmaceuticals (“Mylan”) sued Teva in the District Court for the District of New Jersey. On March 11, 2022 and March 15, 2022, FWK Holdings, LLC, KPH Healthcare Servs., Inc. d/b/a Kinney Drugs, Inc., Meijer Inc., Meijer Distribution, Inc., Labor-Management Healthcare Fund, the Mayor and City Council of Baltimore, and the New York State Teamsters Council Health and Hospital Fund sued Teva in the District Court for the District of New Jersey on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated direct and indirect purchasers of COPAXONE. The complaints assert claims for alleged violations of the Lanham Act, state and federal unfair competition and monopolization laws, tortious interference, trade libel, and a violation of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act. Plaintiffs claim Teva was involved in an unlawful scheme to delay and hinder generic competition concerning COPAXONE sales. Plaintiffs seek damages for lost profits and expenses, disgorgement, restitution, treble damages, attorneys’ fees and costs, and injunctive relief. Teva has moved to dismiss the complaint filed by Mylan on the grounds, among others, that none of its challenged conduct violates the law. That motion remains pending, and Teva’s deadline to answer or move to dismiss the remaining complaints is June 15, 2022.
Opioids Litigation
Since May 2014, more than 3,500 complaints have been filed with respect to opioid sales and distribution against various Teva affiliates, along with several other pharmaceutical companies, by a number of cities, counties, states, other governmental agencies, tribes and private plaintiffs (including various putative class actions of individuals) in both state and federal courts. Most of the federal cases have been consolidated into a multidistrict litigation in the Northern District of Ohio (“MDL Opioid Proceeding”) and many of the cases filed in state court have been removed to federal court and consolidated into the MDL Opioid Proceeding. Two cases that were included in the MDL Opioid Proceeding were transferred back to federal district court for additional discovery,
pre-trial
proceedings and trial. Those cases are: City of Chicago v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al.,
No. 14-cv-04361
(N.D. Ill.) and City and County of San Francisco v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al.,
No. 18-cv-07591-CRB
(N.D. Cal.). Other cases remain pending in various states. In some jurisdictions, such as Illinois, New York, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, Texas, Utah and West Virginia, certain state court cases have been transferred to a single court within their respective state court systems for coordinated pretrial proceedings. Complaints asserting claims under similar provisions of different state law, generally contend that the defendants allegedly engaged in improper marketing and distribution of opioids, including ACTIQ
®
and FENTORA
®
. The complaints also assert claims related to Teva’s generic opioid products. In addition, over 950 personal injury plaintiffs, including various putative class actions of individuals, have asserted personal injury and wrongful death claims in over 600 complaints, nearly all of which are consolidated in the MDL Opioid Proceeding. Furthermore, approximately 700
non-personal
injury complaints and approximately 100 personal injury complaints have named Anda, Inc. (and other distributors and manufacturers) alleging that Anda failed to develop and implement systems sufficient to identify suspicious orders of opioid products and prevent the abuse and diversion of such products to individuals who used them for other than legitimate medical purposes. Plaintiffs seek a variety of remedies, including restitution, civil penalties, disgorgement of profits, treble damages, attorneys’ fees and injunctive relief. Certain plaintiffs assert that the measure of damages is the entirety of the costs associated with addressing the abuse of opioids and opioid addiction and certain plaintiffs specify multiple billions of dollars in the aggregate as alleged damages. The individual personal injury plaintiffs further seek
non-economic
damages. In many of these cases, plaintiffs are seeking joint and several damages among all defendants.
28

Table of Contents
TEVA PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES LIMITED
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
On April 19, 2021, a bench trial in California (The People of the State of California, acting by and through Santa Clara County Counsel James R. Williams, et. al. v. Purdue Pharma L.P., et. al.) commenced against Teva and other defendants focused on the marketing of branded opioids. On December 14, 2021, the court issued its final judgment in favor of the defendants on all claims. Teva expects that the plaintiffs will appeal this judgment. On June 29, 2021, a jury trial in New York (
In re Opioid Litigation
, Index No. 400000/2017)) commenced against Teva and other defendants, focused on the marketing and distribution of opioids. The case was bifurcated between liability and damages. On December 30, 2021, the jury returned a liability verdict in favor of plaintiffs (the County of Suffolk, the County of Nassau and the State of New York), on the plaintiffs’ public nuisance claim. It is anticipated that discovery with respect to the damages portion of the case will begin in 2022 followed by a damages trial. Teva intends to appeal and expects that both Teva and the plaintiffs will file post-trial motions with respect to the liability portion of the case. Absent resolutions, additional trials are expected to proceed in several states in 2022.
In May 2019, Teva settled the Oklahoma litigation brought by the Oklahoma Attorney General (State of Oklahoma, ex. rel. Mike Hunter, Attorney General of Oklahoma vs. Purdue Pharma L.P., et. al.) for $85 million. The settlement did not include any admission of violation of law for any of the claims or allegations made. As the Company demonstrated a willingness to settle part of the litigation, for accounting purposes, management considered a portion of opioid-related cases as probable and, as such, recorded an estimated provision in the second quarter of 2019. Given the relatively early stage of the cases, management viewed no amount within the range to be the most likely outcome. Therefore, management recorded a provision for the reasonably estimable minimum amount in the assessed range for such opioid-related cases in accordance with Accounting Standards Codification 450 “Accounting for Contingencies.”
Additionally, on October 21, 2019, Teva reached a settlement with the two plaintiffs in the MDL Opioid Proceeding that was scheduled for trial for the Track One case, Cuyahoga and Summit Counties of Ohio. Under the terms of the settlement, Teva agreed to provide the two counties with opioid treatment medication, buprenorphine naloxone (sublingual tablets), known by the brand name Suboxone
®
, with a value of $25 million at wholesale acquisition cost and distributed over three years to help in the care and treatment of people suffering from addiction, and a cash payment in the amount of $20 million, which has been paid.
Also on October 21, 2019, Teva and certain other defendants reached an agreement in principle with a group of Attorneys General for a nationwide settlement. This nationwide settlement was designed to provide a mechanism by which the Company attempts to seek resolution of remaining potential and pending opioid claims by both the U.S. states and political subdivisions (i.e., counties, tribes and other plaintiffs) thereof.
On July 21, 2021, it was announced that four other defendants (not including Teva) have reached a nationwide settlement, subject to certain conditions, which includes payment of up to approximately $26 billion spread over up to 18 years. During the passage of time since then, the Company has continued to negotiate the terms and conditions of a nationwide settlement. There remain many complex financial and legal issues still outstanding, including indemnification claims by Allergan against the Company, arising from the acquisition of the Actavis Generics business, which makes the timing of any outcome uncertain. In that regard, Allergan is also in settlement negotiations over various opioid matters and has asked Teva, pursuant to indemnification provisions in agreements between Teva and Allergan arising from Teva’s acquisition of the Actavis generics business, to contribute to those settlements. On December 8, 2021, Allergan reached a settlement in the New York opioids litigation. Allergan has indicated that it may seek indemnification from Teva for a significant portion of that New York settlement, and that it could initiate arbitration proceedings to resolve the dispute. Teva disputes that, under the circumstances, Teva is obligated to provide indemnification in connection with Allergan’s New York settlement.
On September 28, 2021, Teva reached an agreement with the Attorney General of Louisiana that settles the state’s opioid-related claims. The agreement was contingent that all political subdivisions of Louisiana will formally release Teva as part of the settlement, which Teva was advised has occurred by the Attorney General of Louisiana. Under the terms of the settlement, Teva will pay Louisiana $15 million over an
18-year
period and will provide buprenorphine naloxone (sublingual tablets) valued at $3 million (wholesale acquisition cost).
29

Table of Contents
TEVA PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES LIMITED
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
On February 4, 2022, the Company reached an agreement with the Attorney General of the State of Texas that settles Texas’ and its subdivisions opioid-related claims. On March 10, 2022, Texas confirmed that at least 96% of the population of subdivisions will formally release Teva as part of the settlement. Under the terms of the settlement, Teva will pay Texas $150 million over a
15-year
time period and will provide its recently launched, lifesaving medicine generic Narcan
®
(naloxone hydrochloride nasal spray), valued at $75 million (wholesale acquisition cost) over
10
years.
On March 21, 2022, Teva reached an agreement with the Attorney General of Rhode Island that settles Rhode Island’s and its subdivisions’ opioid-related claims. Under the terms of the settlement, Teva will pay Rhode Island $21 million over 13 years, in addition to attorneys’ fees and costs, and will provide generic Narcan
®
(naloxone hydrochloride nasal spray) and a significant amount of buprenorphine naloxone sublingual tablets known by the brand name Suboxone
®
, together valued at $78.5 million (wholesale acquisition cost) over
10
years.
On March 30, 2022, Teva reached an agreement with the Attorney General of Florida that settles Florida’s and its subdivisions’ opioid-related claims. Under the terms of the settlement, Teva will pay Florida $177 million over
15-years
,
in addition to attorneys’ fees
 and costs
, and will provide generic Narcan
®
(naloxone hydrochloride nasal spray) valued at $84 million (wholesale acquisition cost) over
10
years.
As a result of the settlements with Texas, Florida, Louisiana and Rhode Island, recent decisions in California, Oklahoma and New York, as well as continued nationwide settlement negotiation with state Attorneys General and plaintiffs, the Company has reconsidered the potential settlement outcome and revised its provision. The revised provision is a reasonable estimate of the ultimate costs if a nationwide settlement is finalized, after discounting payments to states to their net present value. However, if not finalized for the entirety of the remaining cases, a reasonable upper end of a range of loss cannot be determined. An adverse resolution of any of these lawsuits or investigations may involve large monetary penalties, damages, and/or other forms of monetary and
non-monetary
relief and could have a material and adverse effect on Teva’s reputation, business, results of operations and cash flows.
In August 2019, Teva received a grand jury subpoena from the United States Attorney’s Office for the Eastern District of New York for documents related to the Company’s anti-diversion policies and procedures and distribution of its opioid medications, in what the Company understands to be part of a broader investigation into manufacturers’ and distributors’ monitoring programs and reporting under the Controlled Substances Act. In September 2019, Teva received subpoenas from the New York State Department of Financial Services (NYDFS) as part of an industry-wide inquiry into the effect of opioid prescriptions on New York health insurance premiums. This was followed by a Statement of Charges and Notice of Hearing filed by the NYDFS, although no merits hearing date is currently set. Currently, Teva cannot predict how a nationwide settlement (if finalized) will affect these investigations and administrative actions. In addition, a number of state attorneys general, including a coordinated multistate effort, have initiated investigations into sales and marketing practices of Teva and its affiliates with respect to opioids. Other states are conducting their own investigations outside of the multistate group. Teva is cooperating with these ongoing investigations and cannot predict their outcome at this time.
In addition, several jurisdictions and consumers in Canada have initiated litigation regarding opioids alleging similar claims as those in the United States. The cases in Canada are in their early stages.
Shareholder Litigation

On November 6, 2016 and December 27, 2016, two putative securities class actions were filed in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California against Teva and certain of its current and former officers. After those twoofficers and directors. Those lawsuits were consolidated and transferred to the U.S. District Court for the District of Connecticut (the “Ontario Teachers Securities Litigation”). On December 13, 2019, the court appointed the Ontario Teachers’ Pension Plan Board as lead plaintiff. The lead plaintiff thenin that action filed a consolidatedan amended complaint, purportedly on behalf of purchasers of Teva’s securities between February 6, 2014 and August 3, 2017.May 10, 2019. The consolidatedamended complaint seeks unspecified damages, legal fees, interest, and costs, and it asserts that Teva and certain of its current and former officers and directors violated the federal securities laws and Israeli securitiescommon laws in connection with Teva’s alleged failure to disclose Teva’s participation in an alleged anticompetitive scheme to fix prices and allocate marketspricing strategies for genericvarious drugs in the United States. On December 1, 2017, Tevaits generic drug portfolio and the current and former officer and director defendants filed motions to dismiss the consolidatedby making allegedly false or misleading statements in certain offering materials. The amended complaint with prejudice. On April 3, 2017, the Court granted the motions to dismiss without prejudice. A second amended complaint is expected with renewed dismissal briefing.

On July 17, 2017, a lawsuit was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Ohio derivatively on behalf of the Teva Employee Stock Purchase Plan, and alternatively as a putative class action lawsuit on behalf of individuals who purchased Teva stock through that plan. That lawsuit seeks unspecified damages, legal fees, interest, and costs. The complaint alleges that Teva failed to maintain adequate financial controlsIn July 2017, August 2017, and June 2019, other putative securities class actions were filed in other federal courts based on the facts underpinning Teva’s FCPA deferred prosecution agreement,similar allegations, and also based on allegations substantially similar to those in the putative class action securities lawsuit pending in U.S. District Court for the District of Connecticut, discussed above. On November 29, 2017, the Court granted Teva’s motion to transfer the litigationcases have been transferred to the U.S. District Court for the District of Connecticut where the putative class action securities lawsuit is pending. On December 29,Connecticut. Between August 2017 the parties jointly moved to stay the case pending resolution of the motions to dismissand January 2022, twenty-three complaints were filed in the consolidated putative securities class action described above.

On August 3, 2017, a securities lawsuit was filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of Connecticut by OZ ELS Master Fund, Ltd., OZ Special Funding, L.P, OZ Enhanced Master Fund, Ltd., Gordel Capital Limited, OZ Global Equity Opportunities Master Fund, Ltd., OZ Master Fund, Ltd., and OZ Global Special Investments Master Fund L.P. The complaint asserts thatagainst Teva and certain of its current and former officers violatedand directors seeking unspecified compensatory damages, legal fees, costs and expenses. The similar claims in these complaints have been brought on behalf of plaintiffs, in various forums across the federal securities lawscountry, who have indicated that they intend to

“opt-out”
of the Ontario Teachers Securities Litigation. On March 10, 2020, the Court consolidated the Ontario Teachers Securities Litigation with all of the above-referenced putative class actions for all purposes and the
“opt-out”
cases for pretrial purposes. Pursuant to that consolidation order,
30

Table of Contents
TEVA PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES LIMITED
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
plaintiffs in connection withseveral of the
“opt-out”
cases filed amended complaints on May 28, 2020. On January 22, 2021, the Court dismissed the
“opt-out”
plaintiffs’ claims arising from statements made prior to the five year statute of repose, but denied Teva’s alleged failuremotion to disclosedismiss their claims under Israeli laws. Those
“opt-out”
plaintiffs moved for reconsideration, which was denied on March 30, 2021. On May 24, 2021, Teva moved to dismiss a majority of the
“opt-out”
complaints on various other grounds. Those motions are still pending. The Ontario Teachers Securities Litigation plaintiffs’ Motion for Class Certification and Appointment of Class Representatives and Class Counsel was granted on March 9, 2021, to which Teva’s participation in an alleged anticompetitive scheme to fix prices and allocate markets for generic drugsappeal was denied. On January 18, 2022, Teva entered into a settlement in the United States. On August 30, 2017,Ontario Teachers Securities Litigation for $420 million, which was preliminarily approved by the court enteredon January 27, 2022. Pursuant to an order deferring all deadlines pendingagreement between the resolutionCompany and its insurance carriers, the insurance carriers provided the vast majority of the total settlement amount, with a small portion contributed by Teva. Additionally, as part of the settlement, Teva admitted no liability and denied all allegations of wrongdoing. A number of
“opt-out”
complaints still remain outstanding, and motions to dismissapprove securities class actions were also filed in the consolidatedTel Aviv District Court in Israel with similar allegations to those made in the Ontario Teachers Securities Litigation.
On September 23, 2020, a putative securities class action described above.

On August 21, 2017, a putative class action securities lawsuit was filed by Elliot Grodko in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania against Teva and certain of its former officers alleging, among other things, violations of Section 10(b) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended and SEC Rule

10b-5.
The complaint, purportedly filed on behalf of purchasers of Teva’spersons who purchased or otherwise acquired Teva securities between November 15, 2016October 29, 2015 and August 2, 2017 seeking unspecified damages, legal fees, interest, and costs. The complaint alleged18, 2020, alleges that Teva and certain of its current and former officers violated the federal securities laws and Israeli securities laws by allegedly making false and misleading statements regarding the commercial performance of COPAXONE, namely, by failing to disclose that Teva had caused the submission of false claims to Medicare through Teva’s donations to bona fide independent charities that provide financial assistance to patients, which allegedly impacted COPAXONE’s commercial success and the sustainability of its revenues and resulted in connection with Teva’s acquisition and integration of Actavis Generics.the above referenced August 2020 False Claims Act complaint filed by the DOJ. On April 10, 2018,March 26, 2021, the Court appointed lead plaintiff and lead counsel. On May 25, 2021, lead plaintiff filed an amended class action complaint, which named four additional former and current officers as defendants. On August 10, 2021, lead plaintiff moved to strike certain allegations from its amended complaint and to file a corrected amended complaint, which the court granted that same day. The corrected amended complaint seeks unspecified damages and legal fees. On August 23, 2021, Teva and the individual defendants moved to dismiss the corrected amended complaint. On March 25, 2022, the court (i) held that the corrected amended complaint failed to plead that certain public statements regarding Teva’s compliance with law were misleading, (ii) held that two alleged partial corrective disclosures did not establish loss causation and cannot serve as the basis for plaintiff’s claimed loss, and (iii) dismissed all claims against one of the individual defendants. The court otherwise denied the motion to transfer this actiondismiss with respect to Teva and the District of Connecticut where the Ontario Teachers securities litigation is currently pending.

On August 30, 2017,remaining individual defendants. A motion to approve a putative securities class action was also filed by Barry Bakerin the Central District Court in Israel, which has been stayed pending the U.S. litigation, with similar allegations to those made in the above complaint filed in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania on behalf of purchasers of Teva’s securities between November 15, 2016 and August 2, 2017 seeking unspecified damages, legal fees, interest, and costs. The complaint alleges that Teva and certain officers violated the federal securities laws by making false and misleading statements in connection with Teva’s acquisition and integration of Actavis Generics. On November 1, 2017, the Court consolidated the Baker case with the Grodko case, discussed above. On April 10, 2018, the Court granted Teva’s motion to transfer this action to the District of Connecticut where the Ontario Teachers securities litigation is currently pending.

Pennsylvania.

Motions to approve derivative actions seeking monetary damages against certain past and present directors and officers have been filed in Israel with respect to allegedIsraeli Courts alleging negligence and recklessness with respect to the acquisition of the Rimsa business and the acquisition of Actavis Generics.recklessness. Motions for document disclosure prior to initiating derivativesderivative actions were filed with respect to dividend distributionseveral U.S. and executive compensation.

TEVA PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES LIMITED

NotesEU settlement agreements, opioids, the U.S. price-fixing investigations and allegations related to Consolidated Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

Motions to approve securities class actions against Teva and certain of its current and former directors and officers were filed in Israel with allegationsthe DOJ’s complaint regarding proper disclosure of the above-mentioned pricing investigation as well as lack of disclosure of negative developmentsCopaxone patient assistance program in the generic sector and erosion of the prices of Teva’s products as were presented in the second quarter financial reporting of Teva. Other motions were filed in Israel to approve a derivative action, discovery and a class action related to alleged claims regarding Teva’s above-mentioned FCPA resolution with the SEC and DOJ.

U.S.

Environmental Matters

Teva or its subsidiaries are party to a number of environmental proceedings, or have received claims, including under the federal Superfund law or other federal, provincial or state and local laws, imposing liability for alleged noncompliance, or for the investigation and remediation of releases of hazardous substances and for natural resource damages. Many of these proceedings and claims seek to require the generators of hazardous wastes disposed of at a third party-owned site, or the party responsible for a release of hazardous substances that impacted a site, to investigate and cleanupclean the site or to pay or reimburse others for such activities, including for oversight by governmental authorities and any related damages to natural resources. Teva or its subsidiaries have received claims, or been made a party to these proceedings, along with others, as an alleged generator of wastes that were disposed of or treated at third-party waste disposal sites, or as a result of an alleged release from one of Teva’s facilities or former facilities.

31

Table of Contents
TEVA PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES LIMITED
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)

Although liability among the responsible parties, under certain circumstances, may be joint and several, these proceedings are frequently resolved so that the allocation of cleanup
clean-up
and other costs among the parties reflects the relative contributions of the parties to the site conditions and takes into account other pertinent factors. Teva’s potential liability varies greatly at each of the sites; for some sites the costs of the investigation, cleanup
clean-up
and natural resource damages have not yet been determined, and for others Teva’s allocable share of liability has not been determined. At other sites, Teva has taken an active role in identifying those costs, to the extent they are identifiable and estimable, which do not include reductions for potential recoveries of cleanup
clean-up
costs from insurers, indemnitors, former site owners or operators or other potentially responsible parties. In addition, enforcement proceedings relating to alleged violations of federal, state, commonwealth or local requirements at some of Teva’s facilities may result in the imposition of significant penalties (in amounts not expected to materially adversely affect Teva’s results of operations) and the recovery of certain costs and natural resource damages, and may require that corrective actions and enhanced compliance measures be implemented.

Item 103 of Regulation
S-K
promulgated by the SEC requires disclosure of certain environmental matters when a governmental authority is a party to the proceedings and such proceedings involve potential monetary sanctions, unless the Company reasonably believes that the matter will result in no monetary sanctions, or in monetary sanctions, exclusive of interest and costs, of less than $300,000. The following matter is disclosed in accordance with that requirement. On July 8, 2021, the National Green Tribunal Principal Bench, New Delhi, issued an order against Teva’s subsidiary in India, Teva API India Private Limited, finding
non-compliance
with environmental laws and assessed a penalty of $1.4 million. The Company disputed certain of the findings and the amount of the penalty and filed an appeal before the Supreme Court of India. On August 5, 2021, the Supreme Court of India admitted the appeal for hearing and granted an interim unconditional stay on the National Green Tribunal’s order. The Company does not believe that the eventual outcome of such matter will have a material effect on its business.
Other Matters

On February 1, 2018, former shareholders of Ception Therapeutics, Inc., a company that was acquired by and merged into Cephalon in 2010, prior to Cephalon’s acquisition by Teva, filed breach of contract and other related claims against the Company, Teva USA and Cephalon in the Delaware Court of Chancery. Among other things, the plaintiffs allege that Cephalon breached the terms of the 2010 Ception-Cephalon merger agreement by failing to exercise commercially reasonable efforts to develop and commercialize CINQAIR
®
(reslizumab) for the treatment of eosinophilic esophagitis (EE)(“EE”). The plaintiffs claim damages of at least $200 million, an amount they allege is equivalent to the milestones payable to the former shareholders of Ception in the event Cephalon were to obtain regulatory approval for EE in the United States ($150 million) and Europe ($50 million). All defendants haveDefendants moved to dismiss the plaintiffs’ complaint and on December 28, 2018, the court granted the motion in part and dismissed all of plaintiffs’ claims, except for their claim against Cephalon for breach of contract. In November 2021, plaintiffs moved to amend their complaint to, among other things, reassert claims against the Company and Teva USA, which motion remains pending. Trial in this matter is currently scheduled for September 2022.
NOTE 11 – Income taxes:
In the first quarter of 2022, Teva recognized a tax
expense
of $2 million, on
pre-tax
loss
of $971 million. In the first quarter of 2021, Teva recognized a tax expense of $62 million, on
pre-tax
income of $144 million.
Teva’s tax rate for the first quarter of 2022 was mainly affected by legal settlement charges
, adjustments to valuation allowances on deferred tax assets
and interest expense disallowances.
The statutory Israeli corporate tax rate is 23% in 2022.
Teva’s tax rate differs from the Israeli statutory tax rate, mainly due to generation of profits in various jurisdictions in which tax rates are different than the Israeli tax rate, interest expense disallowances, tax benefits in Israel and other countries, as well as infrequent or
non-recurring
items.
Teva filed briefsa claim seeking the refund of withholding taxes paid to the Indian tax authorities in support2012. Trial in this case is scheduled to begin in July 2022. A final and binding decision against Teva in this case may lead to an impairment of their motions$138 million.
The Israeli tax authorities issued tax assessment decrees for 2008-2012 and 2013-2016, challenging the Company’s positions on April 10, 2018.

several issues. Teva has protested the 2008-2012 and 2013-2016 decrees before the Central District Court in Israel.


32

TEVA PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES LIMITED

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

In October 2021, the Central District Court in Israel held in favor of the Israeli tax authorities with respect to 2008-2011 decrees. The case with respect to 2012-2016 remains pending with similar legal claims. The October 2021 Central District Court decision found that Teva has a tax liability to the Israeli government for 2008-2011 of approximately $350 million, of which a portion will be paid in cash during 2022 and 2023, and the remaining portion will be offset by carried forward losses that Teva would otherwise be entitled to. Teva appealed the decision to the Israeli Supreme Court and expects the appeal hearings to start in the second half of 2022.
The Company believes it has adequately provided for all of its uncertain tax positions, including those items currently under dispute, however, adverse results could be material.
NOTE 1712Segments:

Other assets impairments, restructuring and other items:

   
Three months ended
 
   
March 31,
 
   
2022
   
2021
 
   
(U.S. $ in millions)
 
Impairments of long-lived tangible assets (1)
  $16   $48 
Contingent consideration
   33    3 
Restructuring
   57    81 
Other
   21    4 
   
 
 
   
 
 
 
Total
  $128   $137 
   
 
 
   
 
 
 
(1)
Including impairments related to exit and disposal activities
.
Impairments
Impairments of tangible assets for the three months ended March 31, 2022 and 2021 were $16 million and $48 million, respectively. The impairment for the three months ended March 31, 2022 was mainly related to certain assets in North America. The impairment for the three months ended March 31, 2021 was mainly related to certain assets in Europe.
Teva may record additional impairments in the future, to the extent it changes its plans on any given asset and/or the assumptions underlying such plans, as a result of its network consolidation activities.
Contingent consideration
In November 2017,the three months ended March 31, 2022, Teva recorded an expense of $33 million for contingent consideration, compared to an expense of $3 million in the three months ended March 31, 2021. The expense in the first three months of 2022 was mainly related to a change in the estimated future royalty payments in connection with lenalidomide (generic equivalent of Revlimid
®
), which was part of the Actavis Generics acquisition.
Restructuring
In the three months ended March 31, 2022, Teva recorded $57 million of restructuring expenses, compared to $81 
million of restructuring expenses in the three months ended March 31, 2021. The expenses for the three months ended March 31, 2022 and March 31, 2021 were primarily related to network consolidation activities and residual expenses of the restructuring plan announced in 2017.
The following tables provide the components of restructuring costs: 
   
Three months ended March 31,
 
   
2022
   
2021
 
   
(U.S. $ in millions)
 
Restructuring
          
Employee termination
  $52   $79 
Other
   5    2 
   
 
 
   
 
 
 
Total
  $57   $81 
   
 
 
   
 
 
 
33

TEVA PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES LIMITED
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
The following table provides the components of and changes in the Company’s restructuring accruals:
   
Employee termination
costs
   
Other
   
Total
 
   
(U.S. $ in millions )
 
Balance as of January 1, 2022
  $(131  $(7  $(138
Provision
   (52   (5   (57
Utilization and other*
   59    6    65 
   
 
 
   
 
 
   
 
 
 
Balance as of March 31, 2022
  $(124  $(6  $(130
   
 
 
   
 
 
   
 
 
 
   
Employee termination
costs
   
Other
   
Total
 
   
(U.S. $ in millions )
 
Balance as of January 1, 2021
  $(115  $(7  $(122
Provision
   (79   (2   (81
Utilization and other*
   33    2    35 
   
 
 
   
 
 
   
 
 
 
Balance as of March 31, 2021
  $(161  $(7  $(168
   
 
 
   
 
 
   
 
 
 
*
Includes adjustments for foreign currency translation.
Significant regulatory and other events

In July 2018, Teva announced the voluntary recall of valsartan and certain combination valsartan medicines in various countries due to the detection of trace amounts of a new organizational structurepreviously unknown nitrosamine impurity called NDMA found in valsartan API supplied by Zhejiang Huahai Pharmaceuticals Co. Ltd. (“Huahai”). Since July 2018, Teva has been actively engaged with global regulatory authorities in reviewing its sartan and leadership changesother products to enable strategic alignment acrossdetermine whether NDMA and/or other related nitrosamine impurities are present in specific products. Where necessary, Teva has initiated additional voluntary recalls. In December 2019, Teva reached a settlement with Huahai resolving Teva’s claims related to certain sartan API supplied by Huahai. Under the settlement agreement, Huahai agreed to compensate Teva for some of its portfolios, regionsdirect losses and functions.provide it with prospective cost reductions for API. The settlement does not release Huahai from liability for any losses Teva now operatesmay incur as a result of third party personal injury or product liability claims relating to the sartan API at issue. In addition, multiple lawsuits have been filed in connection with this matter, which may lead to additional customer penalties, impairments and litigation costs.
In the second quarter of 2020, Teva’s operations in its business through three segments: North America, Europemanufacturing facilities in Goa, India were temporarily suspended due to a water supply issue. During the second half of 2020, Teva completed partial remediation of this issue and Growth Markets.restarted limited supply from its Goa facilities. The purposesite experienced some additional delays in the first quarter of 2021 due to labor related issues, but the new structuresituation stabilized during the second quarter of 2021. The water supply remediation is expected to enable stronger alignmentbe completed during the second quarter of 2022, and integration between operations, commercial regions, R&Din the meantime the site is operating under an interim water solution without any material impact expected on compliance and Teva’s global marketing and portfolio function, in ordersupply capacity. The impact to optimize its product lifecycle across the therapeutic areas. Teva’s financial results for the first quarterthree months ended March 31, 2022 was immaterial.
In June 2021, the Company temporarily paused manufacturing at its Irvine, California facility in the United States, and suspended release of 2018product from the facility pending completion of an open manufacturing investigation. In July 2021, the FDA initiated an establishment inspection at the facility. On August 18, 2021, the Company issued field alert reports to the FDA for products manufactured at the Irvine facility and put Irvine manufactured products in Teva’s distribution center on hold. On August 20, 2021, the FDA completed its inspection and issued a Form
FDA-483
to the Irvine facility with ten observations and, on December 17, 2021, the FDA notified the Company that the inspection classification of this site is “official action indicated” (“OAI”). Teva began working diligently to address the FDA’s
34

TEVA PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES LIMITED
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
concerns in a manner consistent with current good manufacturing practice (“CGMP”) requirements, and was in discussions with the FDA Drug Shortage Staff (DSS) and FDA Office of Manufacturing Quality (OMQ) to recommence distribution, release and manufacture of certain medically necessary products from the site under defined controls and protocols.
On March 22, 2022, the Company announced its decision to permanently cease all manufacturing activities and to close the site, and to transfer certain products to other facilities. Teva will remain in contact with the FDA regarding the status of the Irvine, California site to ensure that the Company continues to comply with all relevant CGMP requirements, particularly those involved with product transfers to other sites within the Teva network.
If Teva is unable to address FDA inspection issues satisfactorily, it could be subject to additional regulatory actions. Teva has considered these developments and, as of March 31, 2022, recorded $54 million costs in its financial statements related to this matter. Teva will continue to assess potential financial implications, including loss of revenues, impairments, inventory write offs, customer penalties, costs of additional remediation and/or FDA enforcement actions.

NOTE 13 – Earnings (Loss) per share:
Basic earnings and loss per share are being reported under this new structurecomputed by dividing net income (loss) attributable to Teva’s ordinary shareholders by the weighted average number of ordinary shares outstanding (including fully vested restricted share units (“RSUs”) and performance share units (“PSUs”) during the period, net of treasury shares.
In computing diluted loss per share for the first time.

three months ended March 31, 2022, 0 account was taken of the potential dilution that could occur upon the exercise of options and

non-vested
RSUs and PSUs granted under employee stock compensation plans, and convertible senior debentures, since they had an anti-dilutive effect on loss per share.
In additioncomputing diluted earnings per share for the three months ended March 31, 2021, basic earnings per share were adjusted to these take into account the potential dilution that could occur upon the exercise of options and
non-vested
RSUs and PSUs granted under employee stock compensation plans
. NaN account was taken of the potential dilution by the convertible senior debentures, since they had an anti-dilutive effect on earnings per share.
The weighted average diluted shares outstanding used for the fully diluted share
calculations
for
both
the
three segments,months ended March 31, 2022 and 2021 were 1,107 million shares.
Basic and diluted
los
s
per share
was
$0.86 for the three months ended March 31, 2022, compared to basic and diluted earnings per share of $0.07 for the three months ended March 31, 2021.

NOTE 14 – Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss):
The components of, and changes within, accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) attributable to Teva has other activities, primarilyare presented in the API manufacturing business and certain contract manufacturing services.

All the above changes were reflected through retroactive revisiontable below:

   
Net Unrealized Gains (Losses)
   
Benefit Plans
     
   
Foreign
currency
translation
adjustments
   
Derivative
financial
instruments
   
Actuarial gains
(losses) and
prior service
(costs) credits
   
Total
 
   
(U.S. $ in millions)
 
Balance as of December 31, 2021, net of taxes
  $(2,274  $(324  $(85  $(2,683
   
 
 
   
 
 
   
 
 
   
 
 
 
Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications
   (4   —      —      (4
Amounts reclassified to the statements of income
   —      7         7 
   
 
 
   
 
 
   
 
 
   
 
 
 
Net other comprehensive income (loss) before tax
   (4   7    0      3 
   
 
 
   
 
 
   
 
 
   
 
 
 
Corresponding income tax
   (7   —      —      (7
   
 
 
   
 
 
   
 
 
   
 
 
 
Net other comprehensive income (loss) after tax*
   (11   7    0      (4
   
 
 
   
 
 
   
 
 
   
 
 
 
Balance as of March 31, 2022, net of taxes
  $(2,285  $(317  $(85  $(2,687
   
 
 
   
 
 
   
 
 
   
 
 
 
*
Amounts do not include a $53 million loss from foreign currency translation adjustments attributable to
non-controlling
interests.
35

TEVA PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES LIMITED
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
   
Net Unrealized Gains (Losses)
   
Benefit Plans
     
   
Foreign
currency
translation
adjustments
   
Derivative
financial
instruments
   
Actuarial gains
(losses) and
prior service
(costs) credits
   
Total
 
   
(U.S. $ in millions)
 
Balance as of December 31, 2020, net of taxes
  $(1,919  $(363  $(117  $(2,399
   
 
 
   
 
 
   
 
 
   
 
 
 
Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications
   (174        —      (174
Amounts reclassified to the statements of income
   —      9    —      9 
   
 
 
   
 
 
   
 
 
   
 
 
 
Net other comprehensive income (loss) before tax
   (174   9    —      (165
   
 
 
   
 
 
   
 
 
   
 
 
 
Corresponding income tax
   33    (2   —      31 
   
 
 
   
 
 
   
 
 
   
 
 
 
Net other comprehensive income (loss) after tax*
   (141   7    —      (134
   
 
 
   
 
 
   
 
 
   
 
 
 
Balance as of March 31, 2021, net of taxes
  $(2,060  $(356  $(117  $(2,534
   
 
 
   
 
 
   
 
 
   
 
 
 
*
Amounts do not include a $67 million
loss
from foreign currency translation adjustments attributable to
non-controlling
interests.
NOTE 15 – Segments:
Teva had two reportable segments: generic and specialty medicines. The generic medicines segment included Teva’s OTC and API businesses. Teva’s other activities included distribution activities, sales of medical devices and certain contract manufacturing operation (“CMO”) services.

Teva now operates its business and reports its financial results in three segments:

a)

(a)
North America segment, which includes the United States and Canada.
(b)
Europe segment, which includes the European Union, the United Kingdom and certain other European countries.
(c)
International Markets segment, which includes all countries other than those in the North America and Europe segments.
In addition to these 3 segments, Teva has other sources of revenues, primarily the United Statessale of APIs to third parties, certain contract manufacturing services and Canada.

b) Europe segment, which includes the European Union and certainan

out-licensing
platform offering a portfolio of products to other European countries.

c) Growth Markets segment, which includes all countries other than those in the North America and Europe segments.

pharmaceutical companies through its affiliate Medis.

Teva’s Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”), who is the chief operating decision maker (“CODM”), reviews financial information prepared on a consolidated basis, accompanied by disaggregated information about revenues and contributed profit by the three identified reportable segments, namely North America, Europe and GrowthInternational Markets, to make decisions about resources to be allocated to the segments and assess their performance.

Segment profit is comprised of gross profit for the segment less R&D expenses, S&M expenses, G&A expenses and other income related to the segment. Segment profit does not include amortization and certain other items.

Teva manages its assets on a company basis, not by segments, as many of its assets are shared or commingled. Teva’s CODM does not regularly review asset information by reportable segment and, therefore, Teva does not report asset information by reportable segment.

Teva’s CEO may review its strategy and organizational structure.structure from time to time. Any changes in strategy may lead to a reevaluation of the Company’s segments and goodwill allocation to reporting units, as well as fair value attributable to its reporting units. See note 7.

3 and note 6.

36

TEVA PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES LIMITED

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(Unaudited)


a. Segment information:

   North America  Europe   Growth Markets 
   Three months ended
March 31,
  Three months ended
March 31,
   Three months ended
March 31,
 
   2018  2017  2018   2017   2018  2017 
   (U.S. $ in millions)  (U.S. $ in millions)   (U.S. $ in millions) 

Revenues

  $2,531  $3,240  $1,442   $1,341   $750  $718 

Gross profit

   1,432   2,080   797    734    313   292 

R&D expenses

   188   267   73    106    24   47 

S&M expenses

   305   441   255    279    134   158 

G&A expenses

   126   139   91    79    41   48 

Other income

   (102  (73  1    2    (8  (1
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

 

Segment profit

  $915  $1,306  $377   $268   $122  $40 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

 

   Three months ended
March 31,
 
   2018   2017 
   (U.S.$ in millions) 

North America profit

  $915   $1,306 

Europe profit

   377    268 

Growth Markets profit

   122    40 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total segment profit

   1,414    1,614 

Profit of other activities

   21    7 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 
   1,435    1,621 

Amounts not allocated to segments:

    

Amortization

   310    320 

Other asset impairments, restructuring and other items

   707    240 

Goodwill impairment

   180    —   

Gain on divestitures, net of divestitures related costs

   (93   —   

Inventorystep-up

   —      64 

Other R&D expenses

   22    —   

Costs related to regulatory actions taken in facilities

   1    34 

Legal settlements and loss contingencies

   (1,278   20 

Other unallocated amounts

   61    48 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Consolidated operating income

   1,525    895 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Financial expenses, net

   271    207 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Consolidated income before income taxes

  $1,254   $688 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 


   
Three months ended March 31,
 
   
2022
 
   
North America
   
Europe
   
International Markets
 
   
(U.S. $ in millions)
 
Revenues
  $1,737   $1,156   $492 
Gross profit
   890    694    286 
R&D expenses
   143    58    20 
S&M expenses
   245    196    97 
G&A expenses
   112    59    29 
Other income
   (11   §    (40
   
 
 
   
 
 
   
 
 
 
Segment profit
  $402   $381   $179 
   
 
 
   
 
 
   
 
 
 
§ Represents an amount less than $0.5 million.
   
Three months ended March 31,
 
   
2021
 
   
North America
   
Europe
   
International Markets
 
   
(U.S. $ in millions)
 
Revenues
  $1,989   $1,214   $490 
Gross profit
   1,074    688    260 
R&D expenses
   160    66    18 
S&M expenses
   229    214    96 
G&A expenses
   111    70    26 
Other income
   (3   §    (2
   
 
 
   
 
 
   
 
 
 
Segment profit
  $577   $338   $122 
   
 
 
   
 
 
   
 
 
 
§ Represents an amount less than $0.5 million.

The following table presents a reconciliation of Teva’s segment profits to its consolidated operating income (loss) and to consolidated income (loss) before income taxes for the three months ended March 31, 2022 and 2021:
   
Three months ended
 
   
March 31,
 
   
2022
   
2021
 
   
(U.S. $ in millions)
 
North America profit
  $402   $577 
Europe profit
   381    338 
International Markets profit
   179    122 
   
 
 
   
 
 
 
Total reportable segments profit
   962    1,036 
Profit of other activities
   52    41 
   
 
 
   
 
 
 
Total segments profit
   1,013    1,077 
Amounts not allocated to segments:
          
Amortization
   200    242 
37

TEVA PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES LIMITED

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

Other assets impairments, restructuring and other items
   128    137 
Intangible asset
s
impairments
   149    79 
Legal settlements and loss contingencies
   1,124    104 
Other unallocated amounts
   127    82 
   
 
 
   
 
 
 
Consolidated operating income (loss)
   (713)   434 
   
 
 
   
 
 
 
Financial expenses, net
   258    290 
   
 
 
   
 
 
 
Consolidated income (loss) before income taxes
  $(971)  $144 
   
 
 
   
 
 
 
b. Segment revenues by major products and activities:

The following tables present revenues by major products and activities for the three months ended March 31, 20182022 and 2017:

   Three months ended
March 31,
 
   2018   2017 
   (U.S.$ in millions) 

North America segment

    

Generic products

  $1,088   $1,415 

COPAXONE

   476    797 

BENDEKA / TREANDA

   181    156 

ProAir

   130    121 

QVAR

   107    84 

AUSTEDO

   30    —   

Distribution

   331    295 
   Three months ended
March 31,
 
   2018   2017 
   (U.S.$ in millions) 

Europe segment

    

Generic products

  $997   $850 

COPAXONE

   153    152 

Respiratory products

   113    84 
   Three months ended
March 31,
 
   2018   2017 
   (U.S.$ in millions) 

Growth Markets segment

 

Generic products

  $488   $486 

COPAXONE

   16    21 

Distribution

   153    125 

A significant portion2021: 

North America
  
Three months ended

March 31,
 
   
2022
   
2021
 
   
(U.S. $ in millions)
 
Generic products
  $899   $1,053 
AJOVY
   36    31 
AUSTEDO
   154    146 
BENDEKA
®
/TREANDA
®
   82    91 
COPAXONE
   86    164 
Anda
   342    289 
Other
   139    215 
   
 
 
   
 
 
 
Total
  $1,737   $1,989 
   
 
 
   
 
 
 
Europe
  
Three months ended

March 31,
 
   
2022
   
2021
 
   
(U.S. $ in millions)
 
Generic products
  $876   $865 
AJOVY
   30    16 
COPAXONE
   72    100 
Respiratory products
   71    93 
Other
   107    140 
   
 
 
   
 
 
 
Total
  $1,156   $1,214 
   
 
 
   
 
 
 
38

TEVA PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES LIMITED

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

International markets
  
Three months ended

March 31,
 
   
2022
   
2021
 
   
(U.S. $ in millions)
 
Generic products
  $388   $392 
AJOVY
   6    1 
COPAXONE
   10    12 
Other
   88    85 
   
 
 
   
 
 
 
Total
  $492   $490 
   
 
 
   
 
 
 
NOTE 18—Other income:

   Three months ended March 31, 
   2018   2017 
   (U.S. $ in millions) 

Gain on divestitures, net of divestitures related costs(1)

  $93    —   

Section 8 and similar payments(2)

   99    75 

Gain on sale of assets

   8    —   

Other, net

   3    (3
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total other income

  $203   $72 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

16 – Fair value measurement:
Financial items carried at fair value on a recurring basis as of March 31, 2022 and December 31, 2021 are classified in the tables below in one of the three categories of fair value levels:

   
March 31, 2022
 
   
Level 1
   
Level 2
   
Level 3
   
Total
 
   
(U.S. $ in millions)
 
Cash and cash equivalents:
                    
Money markets
  $276   $—     $—     $276 
Cash, deposits and other
   1,899    —      —      1,899 
Investment in securities:
                    
Equity securities
   16    —      —      16 
Other
   6    —      1    7 
Restricted cash
   75    —      —      75 
Derivatives:
                    
Asset derivatives—options and forward contracts
   —      56    —      56 
Liability derivatives:
                     
Options and forward contracts   —      (31   —      (31
Bifurcated embedded derivatives
   —      —      §    0   
Contingent consideration*
   —      —      (197   (197
   
 
 
   
 
 
   
 
 
   
 
 
 
Total
  $2,272   $25   $(196  $2,101 
   
 
 
   
 
 
   
 
 
   
 
 
 
   
December 31, 2021
 
   
Level 1
   
Level 2
   
Level 3
   
Total
 
   
(U.S. $ in millions)
 
Cash and cash equivalents:
        
Money markets
  $220   $—     $—     $220 
Cash, deposits and other
   1,945    —      —      1,945 
Investment in securities:
                    
Equity securities
   18    —      —      18 
Other
   6    —      1    7 
Restricted cash
   33    —      —      33 
Derivatives:
                    
Asset derivatives—options and forward contracts
   —      30    —      30 
Liability derivatives:
                    
Options and forward contracts   —      (23   —      (23
Bifurcated embedded derivatives   —      —      §    0   
Contingent consideration*
  —      —      (176   (176
   
 
 
   
 
 
   
 
 
   
 
 
 
Total
  $2,222   $7   $(175  $2,054 
   
 
 
   
 
 
   
 
 
   
 
 
 
(1)§Gain related to the divestment of the women’s health business in 2018. See note 3.
Represents an amount less than $0.5 million.
(2)*Section 8 of the Patented Medicines (Notice of Compliance) Regulations relates to recoveries of lost revenue related to patent infringement proceedings
Contingent consideration represents liabilities recorded at fair value in Canada.connection with acquisitions.

39

TEVA PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES LIMITED

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

NOTE 19 – Income Taxes:

In

Teva determined the first quarterfair value of 2018, income taxes were $46 million, or 4%, onpre-tax income of $1.3 billion. In the first quarter of 2017, income taxes were $54 million, or 8%, onpre-tax income of $688 million. Our tax rateliabilities for the first quarter of 2018 was mainly affected byone-time legal settlementscontingent consideration based on a probability-weighted discounted cash flow analysis. This fair value measurement is based on significant unobservable inputs in the market and divestments that hadthus represents a low corresponding tax effect.

Level 3 measurement within the fair value hierarchy. The Company recognized the income tax effectsfair value of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (“TCJA”) in its audited consolidated financial statements included incontingent consideration is based on several factors, such as: the Company’s Annual Report on Form10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017, in accordance with Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 118, which provides SEC staff guidance for the application of ASC Topic 740, Income Taxes, in the reporting period in which the TCJA was enacted into law. The guidance also provides for a measurement period of up to one yearcash flows projected from the enactment date forsuccess of unapproved product candidates; the Companyprobability of success of product candidates, including risks associated with uncertainty regarding achievement and payment of milestone events; the time and resources needed to complete the accountingdevelopment and approval of product candidates; the life of the potential commercialized products and associated risks of obtaining regulatory approvals in the United States and Europe, and the risk adjusted discount rate for fair value measurement. A probability of success factor of 100% was used in the U.S. tax law changes. As such,fair value calculation to reflect inherent regulatory and commercial risk of the Company’s financial results forcontingent

payments and IPR&D. The discount rate applied ranged from 7.3% to 10.7%. The weighted average discount rate, calculated based on the year ended December 31, 2017, reflected a $112 million provisional estimate for itsone-time deemed repatriation tax liability. No subsequent adjustments have been maderelative fair value of Teva’s contingent consideration liabilities, was 7.7%. The contingent consideration is evaluated quarterly, or more frequently, if circumstances dictate. Changes in the fair value of contingent consideration are recorded in consolidated statements of income. Significant changes in unobservable inputs, mainly the probability of success and cash flows projected, could result in material changes to the amounts recordedcontingent consideration liabilities.
The following table summarizes the activity for those financial assets and liabilities where fair value measurements are estimated utilizing Level 3 inputs:
   
Three months
ended March 31,
2022
   
Three months
ended March 31,
2021
 
   
(U.S. $ in millions)
 
Fair value at the beginning of the period
  $(175   (258
Redemption of debt securities
   0      (9
Bifurcated embedded derivatives
   §    0   
Adjustments to provisions for contingent consideration:
          
Actavis Generics transaction
   (31   (3
Eagle transaction
   (2   0   
Settlement of contingent consideration:
          
Eagle transaction
   23    25 
Additional contingent consideration resulting from Novetide acquisition*
   (11   0   
   
 
 
   
 
 
 
Fair value at the end of the period
  $(196  $(245
   
 
 
   
 
 
 
§
Represents an amount less than $0.5 million.
*
In January 2022, Teva acquired 100% ownership of Novetide Ltd. (“Novetide”), which was previously accounted for as “investment in associated companies”. This transaction was accounted for as a business combination. Total consideration for the transaction included cash and certain contingent royalty payments through 2034. As part of the transaction, Teva recognized a gain under “Share in (profits) losses of associated companies, net”, reflecting the difference between the book value of its investment in Novetide and its fair value as of the date Teva completed its acquisition.
40

Table of December 31, 2017, which continueContents
TEVA PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES LIMITED
Notes to representConsolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
Financial instruments not measured at fair value
Financial instruments measured on a provisional estimatebasis other than fair value mostly consist of senior notes and convertible senior debentures (see note 7) and are presented in the impacttable below in terms of the TCJA. The estimated impact of the TCJA is based on certain assumptions and the Company’s current interpretation, and may change as the Company receives additional clarification and implementation guidance and as the interpretation of the TCJA evolves over time.

The statutory Israeli corporate tax rate is 23% in 2018. Our tax rate differs from the Israeli statutory tax rate, mainly due to the mix of profits generated in various jurisdictions where tax rates are different than the Israeli tax rate, tax benefits in Israel and other countries, as well as infrequent or nonrecurring items.

fair value (level 1 inputs):

  
Estimated fair value*
 
  
March 31,
  
December 31,
 
  
2022
  
2021
 
  
(U.S. $ in millions)
 
Senior notes and sustainability-linked senior notes included under senior notes and loans
 $19,858  $21,477 
Senior notes and convertible senior debentures included under short-term debt
  2,067   1,426 
  
 
 
  
 
 
 
Total
 $21,925  $22,903 
  
 
 
  
 
 
 
*
The fair value was estimated based on quoted market prices.
41

Table of Contents
ITEM 2.
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Business Overview

We are a global pharmaceutical company, committed to increasing access to high-quality healthcare tohelping patients around the world. world to access affordable medicines and benefit from innovations to improve their health. Our mission is to be a global leader in generics, specialty medicines and biopharmaceuticals, improving the lives of patients.
We operate worldwide, with headquarters in Israel and a significant presence in the United States, Europe and many other markets around the world. Our key strengths include our world-leading genericsgeneric medicines expertise and portfolio, focused specialty medicines portfolio and global infrastructure and scale.

Teva was incorporated in Israel on February 13, 1944 and is the successor to a number of Israeli corporations, the oldest of which was established in 1901.

In November 2017, we announced a new organizational structure and leadership changes to enable strategic alignment across our portfolios, regions and functions.

Our Business Segments
We now operate our business through three segments: North America, Europe and GrowthInternational Markets. The purpose of the newEach business segment manages our entire product portfolio in its region, including generics, specialty and OTC products. This structure is to enable strongerenables strong alignment and integration between operations, commercial regions, R&D and our global marketing and portfolio function, in order to optimizeoptimizing our product lifecycle across therapeutic areas. Our financial results for the first quarter of 2018 are being reported under this new structure for the first time.

In addition to these three segments, we have other activities, primarily our active pharmaceutical ingredient (“API”) manufacturing business andthe sale of API to third parties, certain contract manufacturing services.

services and an

out-licensing
platform offering a portfolio of products to other pharmaceutical companies through our affiliate Medis.
The
COVID-19
Pandemic
As a leading global pharmaceutical company, Teva provides essential medicines to millions of patients around the world every day. Our priorities remain focused on the health and well-being of our employees and on our responsibility to continue to provide our medicines to the nearly 200 million patients who depend on us every day.
During the first quarter of 2022, we have not experienced material delays in the production and distribution of medicines. The
COVID-19
pandemic has had an effect on our suppliers, which led to minimal delays in our materials supply. However, the supply chain supporting our key products – specialty, generics and API – remains largely uninterrupted, with adequate product inventory across our network and redundancy plans in place to address potential shortfalls, if any. Our facilities that research, manufacture, order, pack, distribute and provide critical customer and patient services remain largely uninterrupted as well, and are currently functioning to meet demand for essential medicines for patients throughout the world.
During the first quarter of 2022, we have experienced delays in clinical trials due to slow-downs of recruitment for studies and suspended regulatory inspections, raw material supply issues, delays in regulatory approvals of new products due to reduced capacity or
re-prioritization
of regulatory agencies and delays in
pre-commercial
launch activities. We may experience further delays if the pandemic continues for an extended period of time.
The data presentedlong-term effects of the pandemic cannot be predicted at this time and would depend on the duration and severity of the pandemic and the restrictive measures put in this reportplace to control its impact. Although no one can predict future demand for prior periods have been conformedpharmaceutical products, market dynamics or the scope or duration of the financial and other challenges arising from the pandemic, it is possible that we will continue to reflectsee variable demand in future periods. While
COVID-19
continues to impact sales in certain markets and for certain products, we do not currently anticipate a material impact on our 2022 financial results due to the changes to our segment reporting commencingongoing global pandemic.
Highlights
Significant highlights in the first quarter of 2018.

Highlights

Significant highlights of the first quarter of 20182022 included:

Revenues in the first quarter of 20182022 were $5.1 billion,$3,661 million, a decrease of 10%8%, or 15%5% in local currency terms, compared to the first quarter of 2017.2021. This decrease was mainly due to lower revenues in our North America segment primarily related to generic products and COPAXONE, partially offset by higher revenues from Anda and generic products in our Europe segment.

Our North America segment generated revenues of $2.5 billion and profit of $915 million in the first quarter of 2018. Revenues decreased by 22%, mainly due to adverse market dynamics in the U.S. generics market, a decrease in COPAXONE® revenues due to generic competition and the loss of revenues from the sale of our women’s health business. Profit decreased by 30% mainly due to lower revenues, partially offset by cost reductions as part of the restructuring plan.

42

Table of Contents
Our North America segment generated revenues of $1,737 million and profit of $402 million in the first quarter of 2022. Revenues decreased by 13% compared to the first quarter of 2021. Profit decreased by 30% compared to the first quarter of 2021.
Our Europe segment generated revenues of $1.4 billion and profit of $377 million. Revenues increased by 8% but decreased by 6% in local currency terms, mainly due to the loss of revenues from the closure of our distribution business in Hungary and the sale of our women’s health business, partially offset by new generic product launches. Profit increased by 41%. The increase was mainly due to higher revenues as well as cost reductions and efficiency measures as part of the restructuring plan.

Our Growth Markets segment generated revenues of $750$1,156 million and profit of $122 million. Revenues increased by 4%, flat in local currency terms. Profit increased by $82 million, mainly due to higher revenues as well as cost reductions and efficiency measures as part of the restructuring plan.

Other asset impairments, restructuring and other items were $707 million, compared to $240$381 million in the first quarter of 2017, mainly due2022. Revenues decreased by 5% compared to a $432 million impairment of long-lived assets and $247 million restructuring expenses.

We recorded a goodwill impairment of $180 million, driven by the change in fair value, including the discount rate and the change in allocated net assets, to the Rimsa reporting unit.

We recorded income of $1.3 billion under legal settlements and loss contingencies. The income consisted primarily of the working capital adjustment with Allergan, the Rimsa settlement and a reversal of the reserve recorded with respect to the carvedilol patent litigation verdict reversal.

Operating income was $1.5 billion in the first quarter of 2018,2021. In local currency terms, revenues increased by 3%. Profit increased by 13% compared to $895the first quarter of 2021.
Our International Markets segment generated revenues of $492 million and profit of $179 million in the first quarter of 2017, mainly due2022. Revenues were flat in U.S. dollars, but increased by 8% in local currency terms, compared to incomethe first quarter of 2021. Profit increased by 47% compared to the first quarter of 2021.
Our revenues from other activities in connection with legal settlements, partially offset bythe first quarter of 2022 were $275 million, a decrease of 5% compared to the first quarter of 2021. In local currency terms, revenues were flat compared to the first quarter of 2021.
Impairments of identifiable intangible assets were $149 million in the first quarter of 2022, compared to $79 million in the first quarter of 2021. See note 5 to our consolidated financial statements.
We recorded expenses of $128 million for other asset impairments, restructuring and other items a goodwill impairment and lower operating income in our North America segment.

Exchange rate movements between the first quarter of 2018 and the first quarter of 2017 positively impacted overall revenues by $240 million and operating income by $37 million.

Our debt decreased by $1.7 billion, mainly due to $6.5 billion of prepayments of certain term loans and senior notes, partially offset by our March 2018 issuance of $4.4 billion of senior notes as well as foreign exchange fluctuations.

Cash flow generated from operating activities was $1.5 billion in the first quarter of 2018,2022, compared to $0.1 billionexpenses of $137 million in the first quarter of 2017,2021. See note 12 to our consolidated financial statements.
Legal settlements and loss contingencies expenses were $1,124 million in the first quarter of 2022, compared to $104 million in the first quarter of 2021. See note 9 to our consolidated financial statements.
Operating loss was $713 million in the first quarter of 2022, compared to an operating income of $434 million in the first quarter of 2021.
Financial expenses were $258 million in the first quarter of 2022, compared to $290 million in the first quarter of 2021.
In the first quarter of 2022, we recognized a tax expense of $2 million, on
pre-tax
loss of $971 million. In the first quarter of 2021, we recognized a tax expense of $62 million, on
pre-tax
income of $144 million. See note 11 to our consolidated financial statements.
As of March 31, 2022, our debt was $22,917 million, compared to $23,043 million as of December 31, 2021. This decrease was mainly due to exchange rate fluctuations.
Cash flow used in operating activities during the first quarter of 2022 was $49 million, compared to $405 million in the first quarter of 2021. The lower cash flow used in operating activities in the first quarter of 2022 was mainly due to changes in working capital items resulting from a decrease in accounts receivables net of SR&A in connection with the decrease in revenues.
During the first quarter of 2022, we generated free cash flow of $117 million, which we define as comprising: $49 million in cash flow used in operating activities, $305 million in beneficial interest collected in exchange for securitized accounts receivables and $25 million in proceeds from the working capital adjustment with Allergandivestitures of businesses and the legal settlement with Rimsa.

Transactions

On January 31, 2018, we completed the sale of a portfolio of products to CVC Capital Partners Fund VI for $703other assets, partially offset by $157 million in cash. The portfoliocash used for capital investment and $7 million in cash used for acquisition of products, which is marketed and sold outsidebusinesses, net of cash acquired. During the United States, includes the women’s health products OVALEAP®, ZOELY®, SEASONIQUE®, COLPOTROPHINE® and other specialty products such as ACTONEL®.

In April 2018,first quarter of 2021, we signed a separation agreement with P&G to terminate the PGT Healthcare partnership that the two companies established in 2011 to market OTC medicines. We will continue to maintain our OTC business on an independent basis. The separation is planned to become effective July 1, 2018, subject to receiptgenerated free cash flow of applicable regulatory approvals. As part$59 million.

43

Table of the separation, we will transfer shares we hold in New Chapter Inc. and ownership rights in an OTC plant located in India to P&G. We will continue to provide certain services to P&G after the separation for a transition period.

Contents

Results of Operations

Comparison of Three Months Ended March 31, 20182022 to Three Months Ended March 31, 2017

The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, certain financial data derived from our U.S. GAAP financial statements.

   Percentage of Net Revenues   Percentage
Change
2018 - 2017
 
   Three Months Ended
March 31,
   
   2018   2017   
   %   %   % 

Net revenues

   100.0    100.0    (10

Gross profit

   46.4    50.2    (17

Research and development expenses

   6.3    7.6    (27

Selling and marketing expenses

   15.2    17.0    (20

General and administrative expenses

   6.5    6.5    (10

Other asset impairments, restructuring and other items

   14.0    4.2    195 

Goodwill impairment

   3.6    —      § 

Legal settlements and loss contingencies

   (25.2   0.4    —   

Other income

   (4.0   (1.3   182 

Operating income

   30.0    15.8    70 

Financial expenses, net

   5.4    3.7    31 

Income before income taxes

   24.6    12.1    82 

Income taxes (benefit)

   0.9    1.0    (15

Share in (profits) losses of associated companies, net

   1.4    (0.1   —   

Net income attributable tonon-controlling interests

   0.3    (0.1   —   

Net income attributable to Teva

   22.0    11.3    74 

Dividends on preferred shares

   1.3    1.2    § 

Net income attributable to ordinary shareholders

   20.7    10.1    82 

§Represents an amount less than 0.5%.

2021

Segment Information

North America Segment

The following table presents revenues, expenses and profit for our North America segment for the three months ended March 31, 20182022 and 2017:

   Three months ended March 31, 
                         2018                                               2017                    
   (U.S.$ in millions / % of Segment Revenues) 

Revenues

  $2,531    100 $3,240    100

Gross profit

   1,432    57  2,080    64

R&D expenses

   188    8  267    8

S&M expenses

   305    12  441    14

G&A expenses

   126    5  139    4

Other income

   (102   (4%)   (73   (2%) 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

 

 

   

 

 

 

Segment profit*

  $915    36 $1,306    40
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

 

 

   

 

 

 

2021:
   
Three months ended March 31,
 
   
2022
  
2021
 
   
(U.S. $ in millions / % of Segment
Revenues)
 
Revenues
  $1,737    100 $1,989    100
Gross profit
   890    51.2  1,074    54.0
R&D expenses
   143    8.2  160    8.0
S&M expenses
   245    14.1  229    11.5
G&A expenses
   112    6.4  111    5.6
Other income
   (11   (0.7%)   (3   § 
  
 
 
   
 
 
  
 
 
   
 
 
 
Segment profit*
  $402    23.1 $577    29.0
  
 
 
   
 
 
  
 
 
   
 
 
 
*
Segment profit does not include amortization and certain other items. The data presented for prior periods have been conformed to reflect the changes to our segment reporting commencing in the first quarter of 2018. See note 17 to our consolidated financial statements and “Teva Consolidated Results—Operating Income” below.

§
Represents an amount less than 0.5%.
North America Revenues

Our North America segment includes the United States and Canada. Revenues from our North America segment in the first quarter of 20182022 were $2.5 billion,$1,737 million, a decrease of $709$251 million, or 22%13%, compared to the first quarter of 2017,2021, mainly due to adverse market dynamicsa decrease in the U.S. generics market, a decline in COPAXONE revenues due to generic competition and the loss of revenues from the sale of our women’s health business,generic products and COPAXONE, partially offset by higher revenues from AUSTEDO, BENDEKA and TREANDA, QVAR and our distribution business.

Revenues in the United States, our largest market, were $2.4 billion in the first quarter of 2018, a decrease of $719 million, or 23%, compared to the first quarter of 2017.

Anda.

Revenues by Major Products and Activities

The following table presents revenues for our North America segment by major products and activities for the three months ended March 31, 20182022 and 2017:

   Three months ended
March 31,
   Percentage
Change
 
   2018   2017   2017-2018 
   (U.S.$ in millions)     

Generic products

  $1,088   $1,415    (23%) 

COPAXONE

   476    797    (40%) 

BENDEKA / TREANDA

   181    156    16

ProAir

   130    121    7

QVAR

   107    84    27

AUSTEDO

   30    —      N/A 

Distribution

   331    295    12

2021:

   
Three months ended

March 31,
   
Percentage

Change
 
   
2022
   
2021
   
2022-2021
 
   
(U.S. $ in millions)
     
Generic products
  $899   $1,053    (15%) 
AJOVY
   36    31    16
AUSTEDO
   154    146    6
BENDEKA/TREANDA
   82    91    (10%) 
COPAXONE
   86    164    (48%) 
Anda
   342    289    18
Other
   139    215    (35%) 
  
 
 
   
 
 
   
Total
  $1,737   $1,989    (13%) 
  
 
 
   
 
 
   
Generic products
revenues in our North America segment (including biosimilars) in the first quarter of 2018 decreased by 23% to $1.1 billion,2022 were $899 million, a decrease of 15% compared to the first quarter of 2017,2021, mainly due to increased competition on key products and lower volumes, partially offset by higher revenues from lenalidomide capsules (the generic version of Revlimid
®
) and continued price erosion.

Truxima

®
.
Among the most significant generic products we sold in North America in the first quarter of 20182022 were methylphenidate extended-release tablets (ConcertaTruxima
® authorized generic)
(the biosimilar to Rituxan
®
), sildenafil citrate tabletslenalidomide capsules (the generic version of Revlimid
®
), epinephrine injectable solution (the generic equivalent of ViagraEpiPen
®), daptomycin injection (the generic equivalent of Cubicin
and EpiPen Jr.
®), amphetamine salt tablets (the generic equivalent of Adderall IR®
) and estradiol vaginal cream (the generic equivalentalbuterol sulfate inhalation aerosol (our ProAir
®
authorized generic).
44

Table of Estrace®).

Contents

In the first quarter of 2018, we led the U.S. generics market in2022, our total prescriptions and new prescriptions, withwere approximately 584302 million total prescriptions,(based on trailing twelve months), representing 15%8.2% of total U.S. generic prescriptions according to IQVIA data.

COPAXONE

On March 7, 2022 we announced the launch of the first generic version of Revlimid
®
 (lenalidomide capsules), in 5mg, 10mg, 15mg, and 25mg strengths, in the United States. These lenalidomide capsules are a prescription medicine used in adults for the treatment of (i) multiple myeloma in combination with the medicine dexamethasone, (ii) certain myelodysplastic syndromes, and (iii) mantle cell lymphoma following specific prior treatment.
AJOVY
revenues in our North America segment in the first quarter of 2018 decreased2022 increased by 40%16% to $476$36 million, compared to the first quarter of 2017,2021, mainly due to growth in volume. In the first quarter of 2022, AJOVY’s exit market share in the United Stated in terms of total number of prescriptions was 23.9% compared to 20.7% in the first quarter of 2021.
AJOVY is indicated for the preventive treatment of migraine in adults. AJOVY was launched in the U.S. in 2018, and was approved in Canada in April 2020. Our auto-injector device for AJOVY became commercially available in the U.S. in April 2020 and in Canada in April 2021. AJOVY is the only anti-CGRP product indicated for quarterly treatment and in January 2021 we launched a new product offering, providing a quarterly dose.
AJOVY is protected by patents expiring in 2026 in Europe and in 2027 in the United States. Applications for patent term extensions have been submitted in various markets around the world, and certain extensions in Europe and other countries have already been granted until 2031. Additional patents relating to the use of AJOVY in the treatment of migraine have also been issued in the United States and will expire between 2035 and 2039. Such patents are also pending in other countries. AJOVY will also be protected by regulatory exclusivity for 12 years from marketing approval in the United States and 10 years from marketing approval in Europe. We filed a lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts alleging that Eli Lilly & Co.’s (“Lilly”) marketing and sale of its galcanezumab product for the treatment of migraine infringes nine Teva patents. Lilly then submitted inter partes review (“IPR”) petitions to the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (“PTAB”), challenging the validity of the nine patents asserted against it in the litigation. The litigation in the district court was stayed pending resolution of the IPR petitions. On February 18, 2020, the PTAB issued decisions on the first six IPRs, finding the six composition of matter patents invalid as being obvious. On March 31, 2020, the PTAB issued a decision upholding the three method of treatment patents. On August 16, 2021, the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed all of the PTAB’s decisions. The litigation is proceeding as to the three method of treatment patents and trial is expected in October 2022. We also filed another suit against Lilly on June 8, 2021, asserting two patents recently granted to Teva, related to the treatment of refractory migraine. Lilly responded to the complaint with a motion to dismiss, which Teva opposed. On March 15, 2022, the U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts denied Lilly’s motion to dismiss and on March 23, 2022, Lilly submitted IPR petitions challenging the patentability of the two refractory migraine patents. On April 11, 2022, Lilly submitted another IPR petition challenging the patentability of a patent related to the two refractory migraine patents. In addition, in 2018 we entered into separate agreements with Alder Biopharmaceuticals, Inc. and Lilly, resolving the European Patent Office oppositions that they filed against our AJOVY patents. The settlement agreement with Lilly also resolved Lilly’s action to revoke the patent protecting AJOVY in the United Kingdom.
AUSTEDO
revenues in our North America segment in the first quarter of 2022 increased by 6%, to $154 million, compared to $146 million in the first quarter of 2021, mainly due to growth in volume.
AUSTEDO was launched in the U.S. in 2017. It is indicated for the treatment of chorea associated with Huntington disease and for the treatment of tardive dyskinesia in adults.
AUSTEDO is protected in the United States by seven Orange Book patents expiring between 2031 and 2038 and in Europe by two patents expiring in 2029. We received notice letters from two ANDA filers regarding the filing of their ANDAs with paragraph (IV) certifications for certain of the patents listed in the Orange Book for AUSTEDO. On July 1, 2021, we filed a complaint against Aurobindo, asserting six of the Orange Book patents, and a separate complaint against Lupin, asserting four of the Orange Book patents. The suits were filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey. The seventh patent was issued in November 2021, and listed in the Orange Book in December 2021. In addition, Apotex filed a petition for IPR by the PTAB of the patent covering the deutetrabenazine compound that expires in 2031. On March 9, 2022, the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office denied Apotex’s petition and declined to institute a review of the deutetrabenazine patent. On April 29, 2022, we reached an agreement with Lupin to resolve the abovementioned dispute over Lupin’s ANDA for a generic deutetrabenazine product. Under the terms of the settlement agreement, the litigation between the parties in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey will be ended, and Lupin will have a license to sell its generic product beginning April 2033, or earlier under certain circumstances. The litigation against Aurobindo remains pending.
BENDEKA
and
TREANDA
combined revenues in our North America segment in the first quarter of 2022 decreased by 10% to $82 million, compared to the first quarter of 2021, mainly due to the availability of alternative therapies and continued competition from Belrapzo
®
(a
ready-to-dilute
bendamustine hydrochloride product from Eagle).
45

Table of Contents
In July 2018, Eagle prevailed in its suit against the FDA to obtain seven years of orphan drug exclusivity in the United States for BENDEKA. On March 13, 2020, this decision was upheld in the appellate court. As things currently stand, drug applications referencing BENDEKA, TREANDA or any other bendamustine product will not be approved by the FDA until the orphan drug exclusivity expires in December 2022. In April 2019, we signed an amendment to the license agreement with Eagle extending the royalty term applicable to the United States to the full period for which we sell BENDEKA and increased the royalty rate. In consideration, Eagle agreed to assume a portion of BENDEKA-related patent litigation expenses.
There are 16 patents listed in the U.S. Orange Book for BENDEKA with expiry dates in 2026 and 2031. In September 2019, a patent infringement action against four of six ANDA filers for generic versions of BENDEKA was tried in the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware. On April 27, 2020, the district court upheld the validity of all of the asserted patents and found that all four ANDA filers infringe at least one of the patents. Three of the four ANDA filers appealed the district court decision. Teva settled with one of the three ANDA filers, and on August 13, 2021, the Federal Circuit issued a Rule 36 affirmance of the district court decision with respect to the other two filers. On December 14, 2021, Apotex filed a Petition for a Writ of Certiorari with the U.S. Supreme Court, which was denied. Litigation against the fifth ANDA filer was dismissed after the withdrawal of its patent challenge, and the case against a sixth ANDA filer was also settled. Recent suits against two filers of 505(b)(2) NDAs referencing BENDEKA are also in the initial stages of litigation.
Additionally, in July 2018, Teva and Eagle filed suit against Hospira, Inc. (“Hospira”) related to its 505(b)(2) NDA referencing BENDEKA in the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware. On December 16, 2019, the district court dismissed the case against Hospira on all but one of the asserted patents, which expires in 2031. On April 18, 2022, Teva and Eagle settled this matter, allowing Hospira to launch its product on January 17, 2028 or earlier under certain circumstances.
In addition to the settlement with Eagle regarding its bendamustine 505(b)(2) NDA, between 2015 and 2020, we reached final settlements with 22 ANDA filers for generic versions of the lyophilized form of TREANDA and one 505(b)(2) NDA filer for a generic version of the liquid form of TREANDA, providing for the launch of generic versions of TREANDA prior to patent expiration.
COPAXONE
revenues in our North America segment in the first quarter of 2022 decreased by 48% to $86 million, compared to the first quarter of 2021, mainly due to generic competition in the United States. COPAXONE revenues in the United States were $462 million in the first quarter of 2018.

Revenues of COPAXONE in our North America segment were 74% of global COPAXONE revenues in the first quarter of 2018, compared to 82% in the first quarter of 2017.

COPAXONE global sales accounted for approximately 13% of our global revenues in the first quarter of 2018 and a significantly higher percentagedecrease in glatiramer acetate market share due to availability of our profits and cash flow from operations during this period.

The FDA approved generic versions of COPAXONE 40 mg/mL in October 2017 and February 2018 and a second generic version of COPAXONE 20 mg/mL in October 2017. Hybrid versions of COPAXONE 20 mg/mL and 40 mg/mL were also approved in the European Union.

COPAXONE 40 mg/mL is protected by five U.S. Orange Book patents that expire in 2030. These patents have been challenged in proceedings in the United States. We are appealing certain adverse U.S. District Court, Patent Trial and Appeal Board decisions to defend these patents in the United States. At least one competitor has fully launched its generic version of COPAXONE 40 mg/mL. This launch, prior to final resolution of the pending patent litigation, should be considered an “at-risk” launch, which means that if the pending litigation is resolved in our favor, the company selling this generic product could face significant damages claims and other potential remedies. COPAXONE 40 mg/mL is also protected by one European patent expiring in 2030. This patent is being challenged in Italy and Norway and has been opposed at the European Patent Office. The U.K. High Court found this patent invalid and our application for permission to appeal this decision was rejected.

alternative therapies.

The market for MS treatments continues to develop, particularly with the recent approvalsapproval of generic versions of COPAXONE discussed above, as well as additional generic versions expected to be approved in the future. The increasing number of oralCOPAXONE. Oral treatments for MS, such as Tecfidera
®
, Gilenya
®
and Aubagio
®
, continuescontinue to present significant and increasing competition. COPAXONE also continues to face competition from existing injectable products, as well as from monoclonal antibodies.

BENDEKAand TREANDA combined antibodies, such as Ocrevus

®
.
Anda
revenues in our North America segment in the first quarter of 20182022 increased by 16%18% to $181$342 million, compared to the first quarter of 2017, mainly due to higher volumes resulting from supply stabilization.

ProAir revenues in our North America segment in the first quarter of 2018 increased by 7% to $130 million, compared to the first quarter of 2017, mainly due to higher volumes. ProAir is the second-largest short-acting beta-agonist in the market, with an exit market share of 46.1% in terms of total number of prescriptions during the first quarter of 2018, compared to 47.7% in the first quarter of 2017.

QVARrevenues in our North America segment in the first quarter of 2018 increased by 27% to $107 million, compared to the first quarter of 2017. We launched QVAR® RediHaler in the first quarter of 2018. The increase in sales in the first quarter of 2018 was mainly due to slightly higher wholesaler stocking for all QVAR family products in connection with the launch. QVAR maintained its second-place position in the inhaled corticosteroids category in the United States, with an exit market share of 29.4% in terms of total number of prescriptions during the first quarter of 2018, compared to 38.1% in the first quarter of 2017.

AUSTEDOrevenues in our North America segment in the first quarter of 2018 were $30 million. AUSTEDO was approved by the FDA and launched in April 2017 in the United States for the treatment of chorea associated with Huntington disease. In August 2017, the FDA approved AUSTEDO for the treatment of tardive dyskinesia.

Distribution revenues in our North America segment, which are generated by Anda, increased by 12% to $331$289 million in the first quarter of 2018, compared to the first quarter of 2017,2021, mainly due to the severe cold, cough and influenza seasonhigher demand for COVID-related products. Anda, our distribution business in the first quarter of 2018, which increased demand for certain medicines. Our Anda businessUnited States, distributes generic, specialty and OTC pharmaceutical products from various third party manufacturers to independent retail pharmacies, pharmacy retail chains, hospitals and physician offices in the United States. Anda is able to compete in the secondary distribution market by maintaining high inventory levels for a broad offering of products, competitive pricing and offering next day delivery throughout the United States and competitive pricing.

States.

46

Product Launches and Pipeline

In the first quarter of 2018,2022, we launched the generic versionsversion of the following branded products in North America (listed by month of launch):

Product Name

  

Brand Name

  

Launch
Date

  Total Annual U.S.
Branded Sales at Time
of Launch
(U.S.$ in millions (IQVIA))*
 

Estradiol Vaginal Cream, USP, 0.01%

  Estrace®  January  $304 

Methylphenidate Hydrochloride Extended-Release Capsules (LA), CII 20 mg, 30 mg & 40 mg

  Ritalin LA® ER  January  $97 

Busulfan Injection 6 mg/mL, 60 mg

  Busulfex®  January  $86 

Trientine Hydrochloride Capsules, USP 250 mg

  Syprine®  February  $147 

Hydrocortisone Butyrate Cream USP, 0.1% (Lipophilic)

  Locoid Lipocream®  February  $6 

Minocycline Hydrochloride Extended-Release Tablets, USP 65 mg & 115 mg

  Solodyn® ER  February  $148 

Lansoprazole Delayed-Release Orally Disintegrating Tablets 15 mg & 30 mg

  Prevacid® SoluTab DR ODT  March  $184 

Tiagabine Hydrochloride Tablets 12 mg & 16 mg **

  Gabitril®  March  $9 

Palonosetron Hydrochloride Injection 0.05 mg/mL, 0.25 mg

  Aloxi®  March  $452 

Mesalamine Delayed-Release Tablets, USP 1.2 g

  Lialda® DR  March  $1,128 

America:
Product Name
  
Brand Name
 
Launch
Date
  
Total Annual U.S.
Branded Sales
(U.S. $ in millions
(IQVIA))
*
 
Fluticasone Propionate and Salmeterol Inhalation Powder, USP
  Advair Diskus
®
 March  $2,940 
Lenalidomide Capsules, 5, 10, 15, & 25 mg
  Revlimid
®
 capsules
 March  $2,143 
Diclofenac Potassium Capsules
  Zipsor
®
 Liquid Filled
Capsules
 March  $20 
*
The figures presented are for the twelve months ended in the calendar quarter immediately prior to our launch or
re-launch.
**Authorized generic version of a Teva specialty product.

Our generic products pipeline in the United States includes, as of March 31, 2018, 3252022, 189 product applications awaiting FDA approval, including 8667 tentative approvals. This total reflects all pending ANDAs, supplements for product line extensions and tentatively approved applications and includes some instances where more than one application was submitted for the same reference product. Excluding overlaps, the branded products underlying these pending applications had U.S. sales for the twelve months ended December 31, 2017 exceeding2021 of approximately $111 billion, according to IQVIA. Approximately 70%71% of pending applications include a paragraph IV patent challenge, and we believe we are first to file with respect to 11072 of these products, or 129100 products including final approvals where launch is pending a settlement agreement or court decision. Collectively, these first to file opportunities represent over $63$81 billion in U.S. brand sales for the twelve months ended December 31, 2017,2021, according to IQVIA.

IQVIA reported brand sales are one of the many indicators of future potential value of a launch, but equally important are the mix and timing of competition, as well as cost effectiveness. The potential advantages of being the first filer with respect to some of these products may be subject to forfeiture, shared exclusivity or competition from
so-called “authorized
“authorized generics,” which may ultimately affect the value derived.

In the first quarter of 2018,2022, we received tentative approvals for generic equivalents of the products listed in the table below, excluding overlapping applications. A “tentative approval” indicates that the FDA has substantially completed its review of an application and final approval is expected once the relevant patent expires, a court decision is reached, a
30-month
regulatory stay lapses or a
180-day
exclusivity period awarded to another manufacturer either expires or is forfeited.

Generic Name

  Brand Name Total U.S. Annual Branded
Market (U.S. $ in millions (IQVIA))*
 

Eltrombopag tablets, 12.5 mg, 25 mg & 75 mg

  Promacta® $200 

Esomeprazole magnesium delayed-release capsules, 20 mg

  Nexium® DR $85 

Ingenol mebutate gel, 0.05%

  Picato® $17 

Nicotine polacrilex mini mint lozenges, 2 mg & 4 mg

  Nicorette® $68 

Perampanel tablets, 2 mg, 4 mg, 6 mg, 8 mg & 10 mg

  Fycompa® $68 

Rotigotine transdermal system, 1 mg/24 hr, 2 mg/24 hr, 3 mg/24 hr, 4 mg/24 hr, 6 mg/24 hr & 8 mg/24 hr

  Neupro® $143 

Ticagrelor tablets, 60 mg & 90 mg

  Brilinta® $712 

Generic Name
  
Brand Name
 
Total Annual U.S.
Branded Sales
(U.S. $ in millions
(IQVIA))
*
 
Midostaurin Capsules, 25 mg
  Rydapt
®
 $88 
Riociguat Tablets
  Adempas
®
 $12 
Gefitinib Tablets, 250 mg
  Iressa
®
 $6 
*For
The figures presented are for the twelve months ended in the calendar quarter immediately prior to the receipt of tentative approval.our launch or
re-launch.

In the first quarter

47

Table of 2018,Contents
For information regarding our specialty and biosimilar products pipeline, in North America consisted of the following products:

Therapeutic AreaProduct

Potential Indication(s)

Route of
Administration

Development Phase

(date entered phase 3)

neurology and neuropsychiatryAUSTEDO
(deutetrabenazine)
Tourette syndromeOral3 (December 2017)
LaquinimodRelapsing remitting multiple sclerosisOralDiscontinued
Progressive forms of multiple sclerosisOralDiscontinued
Huntington diseaseOral2
PridopidineHuntington diseaseOralDiscontinued due to pipeline prioritization
TV-46000 (risperidone
LAI)
SchizophreniaLAI3 (April 2018)
Migraine and PainFremanezumab (anti
CGRP)
Chronic and episodic migraineSubcutaneousSubmitted to FDA (October 2017)(1)
Cluster headacheSubcutaneous3 (November 2016)
Post traumatic headacheSubcutaneous2
Fasinumab(2)Osteoarthritis painSubcutaneous3 (March 2016)
Chronic lower back painSubcutaneous2
TV-45070Neuropathic painTopicalPartnership with Xenon terminated by mutual agreement
RespiratoryCINQAIR/
CINQAERO

Severe asthma with

eosinophilia

Subcutaneous3 (August 2015)
ProAire-RespiClickBronchospasm and exercise induced bronchitisOral
inhalation
Submitted to FDA (September 2017)
OncologyCT-P10(3)(biosimilar candidate to Rituxan® US)Submitted to FDA (2017)
CT-P6(3)(biosimilar candidate to Herceptin® US)Submitted to FDA (2017)

(1)We do not expect to receive FDA approval on our Biologics License Applications (“BLA”) for fremanezumab on themid-June PDUFA date. We are engaged in a constructive dialogue with the FDA in close collaboration with our partner Celltrion, Inc. (“Celltrion”). We expect an FDApre-approval inspection to take place in the coming months and to receive FDA approval and launch before the end of 2018.
(2)Developed in collaboration with Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (“Regeneron”). Regeneron recently reported that an independent Data Monitoring Committee monitoring the ongoing safety and efficacy of the fasinumab clinical trials recommended that the higher dose-regimens be discontinued based on the risk benefit assessment, and that the program may continue with the lower dose-regimens of fasinumab. We understand that Regeneron is modifying the trials accordingly.
(3)Developed under collaboration agreement with Celltrion. During the first quarter of 2018, Celltrion received complete response letters from the FDA regarding the BLAs for these biosimilar products. Celltrion is working on resolving all issues and resubmitting the BLAs.

see “—Teva Consolidated Results—Research and Development (R&D) Expenses” below.

North America Gross Profit

Gross profit from our North America segment in the first quarter of 20182022 was $1.4 billion,$890 million, a decrease of 31%17%, compared to $2.1 billion$1,074 million in the first quarter of 2017. The2021. This decrease was mainly due to lower COPAXONE andgross profit from generic products revenues.

and lower gross profit from COPAXONE.

Gross profit margin for our North America segment in the first quarter of 20182022 decreased to 56.6% from 64.2%51.2%, compared to 54.0% in the first quarter of 2017.2021. This decrease was mainly due to lower COPAXONE revenues (4.0 points) and continued price erosiona change in the mix of generic products (3.0 points).

and COPAXONE.

North America R&D Expenses

R&D expenses relating to our North America segment in the first quarter of 20182022 were $188$143 million, a decrease of 30%11%, compared to $267$160 million in the first quarter of 2017.

2021.

For a description of our R&D expenses in the first quarter of 2018,2022, see “—Teva Consolidated Results—Research and Development (R&D) Expenses” below.

North America S&M Expenses

S&M expenses relating to our North America segment in the first quarter of 20182022 were $305$245 million, a decreasean increase of 31%7%, compared to $441$229 million in the first quarter of 2017. The decrease2021. This increase was mainly due to cost reductions and efficiency measures as part of the restructuring plan.

direct to consumer promotional expenses related to AUSTEDO.

North America G&A Expenses

G&A expenses relating to our North America segment in the first quarter of 20182022 were $126$112 million, a decrease of 9%flat compared to $139 million in the first quarter of 2017. The decrease was mainly due to cost reductions as part of the restructuring plan.

North America Other Income

Other income from our North America segment in the first quarter of 2018 was $102 million, an increase of 40% compared to $73 million in the first quarter of 2017. The increase was mainly due to higher Section 8 recoveries from multiple cases in Canada. Section 8 of the Patented Medicines (Notice of Compliance) Regulations relates to recoveries of lost revenue related to patent infringement proceedings.

2021.

North America Profit

Profit from our North America segment consists of gross profit less R&D expenses, S&M expenses, G&A expenses and any other income related to this segment. Segment profit does not include amortization and certain other items. The data presented for prior periods have been conformed to reflect the changes to our segment reporting commencing in the first quarter of 2018. See note 17 to our consolidated financial statements and “Teva Consolidated Results—Operating Income” below.

Profit from our North America segment in the first quarter of 20182022 was $915$402 million, a decrease of 30% compared to $1.3 billion$577 million in the first quarter of 2017. The decrease was2021, mainly due to lower revenues, due to generic competition for COPAXONE and continued price erosion in the U.S. generics market, partially offset by cost reductions as part of the restructuring plan and higher other income.

discussed above.

Europe Segment

The following table presents revenues, expenses and profit for our Europe segment for the three months ended March 31, 20182022 and 2017:

   Three months ended March 31, 
   2018  2017 
   (U.S.$ in millions / % of Segment Revenues) 

Revenues

  $1,442        100 $1,341        100

Gross profit

   797    55  734    55

R&D expenses

   73    5  106    8

S&M expenses

   255    18  279    21

G&A expenses

   91    6  79    6

Other expenses

   1   §   2   § 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

 

 

   

 

 

 

Segment profit*

  $377    26  268    20
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

 

 

   

 

 

 

*Segment profit does not include amortization and certain other items. The data presented for prior periods have been conformed to reflect the changes to our segment reporting commencing in the first quarter of 2018. See note 17 to our consolidated financial statements and “Teva Consolidated Results—Operating Income” below.
§Represents an amount less than 0.5%.

2021:

   
Three months ended March 31,
 
   
2022
  
2021
 
   
(U.S. $ in millions / % of Segment
Revenues)
 
Revenues
  $1,156    100 $1,214    100
Gross profit
   694    60.0  688    56.6
R&D expenses
   58    5.0  66    5.4
S&M expenses
   196    17.0  214    17.7
G&A expenses
   59    5.1  70    5.8
Other income
  §   §  §   § 
  
 
 
   
 
 
  
 
 
   
 
 
 
Segment profit*
  $381    32.9 $338    27.8
  
 
 
   
 
 
  
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
*   Segment profit does not include amortization and certain other items.
§   Represents an amount less than $0.5 million or 0.5%, as applicable.
    
    
48

Europe Revenues

Our Europe segment includes the European Union, the United Kingdom and certain other European countries. Revenues from our Europe segment in the first quarter of 20182022 were $1.4 billion, an increase$1,156 million, a decrease of 8%5%, or $101$58 million, compared to the first quarter of 2017.2021. In local currency terms, revenues decreasedincreased by 6%,3%.
In the first quarter of 2021, our lower revenues were impacted by the implications of the
COVID-19
pandemic. In the first quarter of 2022, our higher revenues were attributed to higher demand for generic and OTC products resulting mainly due to the loss of revenues from the closureremoval of our distribution businessrestrictions related to doctor and hospital visits by patients that were previously implemented in Hungaryresponse to the
COVID-19
pandemic, as well as higher sales of cough and cold products.
In the salefirst quarter of our women’s health business, partially offset2022, revenues were negatively impacted by new generic product launches.

exchange rate fluctuations of $67 million, net of hedging effects.

Revenues by Major Products and Activities

The following table presents revenues for our Europe segment by major products and activities for the three months ended March 31, 20182022 and 2017:

   Three months ended   Percentage 
   March 31,   Change 
   2018   2017   2017-2018 
   (U.S.$ in millions)     

Generic products

  $997   $850    17

COPAXONE

   153    152    1

Respiratory products

   113    84    35

2021:

   
Three months ended

March 31,
   
Percentage
Change
 
   
2022
   
2021
   
2022-2021
 
   
(U.S. $ in millions)
     
Generic products
  $876   $865    1
AJOVY
   30    16    94
COPAXONE
   72    100    (29%) 
Respiratory products
   71    93    (24%) 
Other
   107    140    (24%) 
  
 
 
   
 
 
   
Total
  $1,156   $1,214    (5%) 
  
 
 
   
 
 
   
Generic products
revenues in our Europe segment in the first quarter of 2018,2022, including OTC products, increased by 17%1% to $997$876 million, compared to the first quarter of 2017.2021. In local currency terms, revenues increased by 2%8%, mainly due to new product launcheshigher demand for generic and volume growthOTC products, resulting mainly from the removal of restrictions related to doctor and hospital visits by patients that were previously implemented in OTC, partially offset by price reductions.

COPAXONEresponse to the

COVID-19
pandemic, as well as higher sales of cough and cold products.
AJOVY
revenues in our Europe segment in the first quarter of 20182022 increased by 1% to $153$30 million, compared to the first quarter of 2017. In local currency terms, revenues decreased by 13%, mainly due to price reductions resulting from the entry of generic competition.

Revenues of COPAXONE in our Europe segment were 24% of global COPAXONE revenues$16 million in the first quarter of 2018, compared2021, mainly due to 16%growth in the first quarter of 2017.

European countries in which AJOVY had previously been launched, as well as launches and reimbursements in additional European countries.

For further information on COPAXONE,about AJOVY patent protection, see “—North America Revenues—Revenues by Major Product” above.

Respiratory products

COPAXONE
revenues in our Europe segment in the first quarter of 2018 increased2022 decreased by 35%29% to $113$72 million, compared to the first quarter of 2017.2021. In local currency terms, revenues increaseddecreased by 18%24%, due to price reductions and a decline in volume resulting from competing glatiramer acetate products.
One European patent protecting COPAXONE 40 mg/mL was found invalid by the Board of Appeal of the European Patent Office in September 2020. Two additional patents expiring in 2030 were found invalid at the European Patent Office in December 2021. In certain countries, Teva remains in litigation against generic companies on an additional COPAXONE 40 mg/mL patent that expires in 2030.
Respiratory products
revenues in our Europe segment in the first quarter of 2022 decreased by 24% to $71 million compared to the first quarter of 2021. In local currency terms, revenues decreased by 19%, mainly due to the launch of BRALTUS® in 2017.

price reductions.

Product Launches and Pipeline

As of March 31, 2018,2022, our generic products pipeline in Europe included 234185 generic approvals in Europe relating to 4633 compounds in 9575 formulations, andwith no European Medicines Agency (“EMA”) approvals received. In addition, approximately 1,5031,241 marketing authorization applications are pending approval in 37 European countries, relating to 183132 compounds in 364 formulations, including one application266 formulations. Two applications are pending with the EMA forwith one strengthapplication relating to three strengths in 30 countries.

markets.

49

Table of Contents
For information regarding our specialty pipeline and launches in the first quarter of 2018,biosimilar products pipeline, see “—North America Segment—Product LaunchesTeva Consolidated Results—Research and Pipeline.”

Development (R&D) Expenses” below.

Europe Gross Profit

Gross profit from our Europe segment in the first quarter of 20182022 was $797$694 million, an increase of 9%1% compared to $734$688 million in the first quarter of 2017. The increase was due to the positive impact of currency fluctuations, partially offset by the loss of revenues from the sale of our women’s health business.

2021.

Gross profit margin for our Europe segment in the first quarter of 20182022 increased to 55.3%60.0%, from 54.7%compared to 56.6% in the first quarter of 2017.2021. This increase was mainly due to the closurelower cost of goods sold, mainly driven by our distribution businessnetwork consolidation activities, as well as a decrease in Hungary (1.6 points), partially offset by other production costs (1.0 points).

write-offs.

Europe R&D Expenses

R&D expenses relating to our Europe segment in the first quarter of 20182022 were $73$58 million, a decrease of 31%12% compared to $106$66 million in the first quarter of 2017.

2021.

For a description of our R&D expenses in the first quarter of 2018,2022, see “—Teva Consolidated Results—Research and Development (R&D) Expenses” below.

Europe S&M Expenses

S&M expenses relating to our Europe segment in the first quarter of 20182022 were $255$196 million, a decrease of 9%8% compared to $279$214 million in the first quarter of 2017. The2021. This decrease was mainly due to cost reductionsexchange rate fluctuations, as partwell as lower marketing costs in the first quarter of the restructuring plan, partially offset by currency fluctuations.

2022.

Europe G&A Expenses

G&A expenses relating to our Europe segment in the first quarter of 20182022 were $91$59 million, an increasea decrease of 15% compared to $79$70 million in the first quarter of 2017. The increase was mainly due to currency fluctuations, partially offset by cost reductions as part of the restructuring plan.

2021.

Europe Profit

The profit of

Profit from our Europe segment consists of gross profit less R&D expenses, S&M expenses, G&A expenses and any other income related to this segment. Segment profit does not include amortization and certain other items. The data presented for prior periods have been conformed to reflect the changes to our segment reporting commencing in the first quarter of 2018. See note 17 to our consolidated financial statements and “—Teva Consolidated Results—Operating Income” below.

Profit from our Europe segment in the first quarter of 20182022 was $377$381 million, an increase of 41%13%, compared to $268$338 million in the first quarter of 2017. The2021. This increase was mainly due to higher revenuesgross profit and reduced expenses, as well as cost reductions and efficiency measures as part of the restructuring plan.

Growthdiscussed above.

International Markets Segment

The following table presents revenues, expenses and profit for our GrowthInternational Markets segment for the three months ended March 31, 20182022 and 2017:

   Three months ended March 31, 
                     2018                                       2017                
   (U.S.$ in millions / % of Segment Revenues) 

Revenues

  $750    100 $718    100

Gross profit

   313    42  292    41

R&D expenses

   24    4  47    7

S&M expenses

   134    18  158    22

G&A expenses

   41    5  48    7

Other income

   (8   (1%)   (1  § 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

 

 

   

 

 

 

Segment profit*

  $122    16 $40    6
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

 

 

   

 

 

 

2021:
   
Three months ended March 31,
 
   
2022
  
2021
 
   
(U.S. $ in millions / % of Segment Revenues)
 
Revenues
  $492    100 $490    100
Gross profit
   286    58.1  260    53.0
R&D expenses
   20    4.0  18    3.6
S&M expenses
   97    19.8  96    19.6
G&A expenses
   29    5.9  26    5.3
Other income
   (40   (8.1%)   (2  § 
  
 
 
   
 
 
  
 
 
   
 
 
 
Segment profit*
  $179    36.4 $122    24.9
  
 
 
   
 
 
  
 
 
   
 
 
 
*
Segment profit does not include amortization and certain other items. The data presented for prior periods have been conformed to reflect the changes to our segment reporting commencing in the first quarter of 2018. See note 17 to our consolidated financial statements and “—Teva Consolidated Results—Operating Income” below.
§
Represents an amount less than 0.5%.

Growth

50

International Markets Revenues

Our GrowthInternational Markets segment includes all countries in which we operate other than those in our North America and Europe segments. The International Markets segment includes more than 35 countries, covering a substantial portion of the global pharmaceutical market. Our key growthinternational markets are Japan, Russia and Israel. The countries in this category range fromour International Markets segment include highly regulated, pure generic markets, such as Israel, to hybrid markets, such as Japan, to branded generics oriented markets, such as Russia and certain CommonwealthLatin America markets and hybrid markets, such as Japan.
In February 2022, Russia launched an invasion of Independent States (CIS), Latin AmericanUkraine. As of the date of this Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q,
sustained conflict and Asia Pacificdisruption in the region is ongoing. Russia and Ukraine markets are included in our International Markets segment results. We have no manufacturing or R&D facilities in these markets.

During the first quarter of 2022, the impact of this conflict on our International Markets segment results of operations and financial condition was immaterial. Consistent with our foreign exchange risk management hedging programs, we enter into hedges to hedge our exposure to currency exchange rate fluctuations with respect to our balance sheet assets, revenues and expenses. In the first quarter of 2022, prior to escalation of the conflict, we took measures to reduce our operational cash balances in Russia and Ukraine and we are monitoring the solvency of our customers in Russia and Ukraine and taking measures, where practicable, to mitigate our exposure to risks related to the conflict in the region. However, the duration, severity and global implications (including potential inflation and devaluation consequences) of the conflict cannot be predicted at this time and could have an effect on our business, including on our exchange rate exposure, supply chain, operational costs and commercial presence in these markets.

On February 1, 2021, we completed the sale of the majority of the generic and operational assets of our business venture in Japan.
Revenues from our GrowthInternational Markets segment in the first quarter of 20182022 were $750$492 million, an increase of $32 million, or 4%, compared to the first quarter of 2017. In local currency terms, revenues were flat compared to the first quarter of 2017,2021. In local currency terms, revenues increased by 8% compared to the first quarter of 2021, mainly due to higher salesrevenues in Israel, Japan and Russia,certain markets, partially offset by lower revenues in Japan resulting from the effectdivestment mentioned above, as well as regulatory price reductions and generic competition to
off-patented
products. Revenues continued to be affected by the ongoing impact of the deconsolidation of our subsidiaries in Venezuela
COVID-19
pandemic on markets and the loss of revenues from the sale of our women’s health business.

on customer stocking and purchasing patterns.

Revenues by Major Products and Activities

The following table presents revenues for our GrowthInternational Markets segment by major products and activities for the three months ended March 31, 20182022 and 2017:

   Three months ended   Percentage 
   March 31,   Change 
   2018   2017   2017-2018 
   (U.S.$ in millions)     

Generic products

  $488   $486   § 

COPAXONE

   16    21    (24%) 

Distribution

   153    125    22

2021:
   
Three months ended

March 31,
   
Percentage
Change
 
   
2022
   
2021
   
2022-2021
 
   
(U.S. $ in millions)
     
Generic products
  $388   $392    (1%) 
AJOVY
   6    1    315
COPAXONE
   10    12    (11%) 
Other
   88    85    4
  
 
 
   
 
 
   
Total
  $492   $490    § 
  
 
 
   
 
 
   
§
Represents an amount less than 0.5%.

Generic products
revenues in our GrowthInternational Markets segment in the first quarter of 2018,2022, which include OTC products, were flat compared to the first quarter of 2017.decreased by 1% in U.S. dollars. In local currency terms, revenues decreasedincreased by 3%, mainly due9% to the effect of the deconsolidation of our subsidiaries in Venezuela.

COPAXONE revenues in our Growth Markets segment in the first quarter of 2018 decreased by 24% to $16$388 million, compared to the first quarter of 2017. In local currency terms, revenues decreased by 20%.

For further information about COPAXONE, see “—North America Revenues—Revenues by Major Product” above.

Distribution revenues in our Growth Markets segment in the first quarter of 2018 increased by 22% to $153 million, compared to the first quarter of 2017. In local currency terms, revenues increased by 13%.

Growth Markets Gross Profit

Gross profit from our Growth Markets segment in the first quarter of 2018 was $313 million, an increase of 7% compared to $292 million in the first quarter of 2017. The2021. This increase was mainly due to higher revenues in Japan, including a milestone payment from Takeda following approval of AZILECT®, and higher revenues in Israel,certain markets, partially offset by the deconsolidation of our subsidiarieslower sales in Venezuela and the loss of revenuesJapan resulting from the saledivestment mentioned above, as well as regulatory price reductions and generic competition to

off-patented
products in Japan.
51

Table of Contents
AJOVY
was launched in certain markets in our women’s health business.

Gross profit margin forInternational Markets segment, including in Japan in August 2021. We are moving forward with plans to launch AJOVY in other markets. AJOVY revenues in our GrowthInternational Markets segment in the first quarter of 2018 increased2022 were $6 million, compared to 41.7%, from 40.7%$1 million in the first quarter of 2017. This increase was mainly due to higher gross profit2021.

COPAXONE
revenues in Japan (3.5 points), partially offset by the deconsolidation of our subsidiaries in Venezuela (1.3 points) and currency fluctuations in Argentina (0.8 points).

Growth Markets R&D Expenses

R&D expenses relating to our GrowthInternational Markets segment in the first quarter of 20182022 were $24$10 million a decrease of 49% compared to $47$12 million in the first quarter of 2017.

2021.

AUSTEDO
was launched in early 2021 in China for the treatment of chorea associated with Huntington’s disease and for the treatment of tardive dyskinesia, and was also launched in Israel during 2021. In October 2021, we received marketing approval for both indications in Brazil. We continue with additional submissions in various other markets.
International Markets Gross Profit
Gross profit from our International Markets segment in the first quarter of 2022 was $286 million, an increase of 10% compared to $260 million in the first quarter of 2021.
Gross profit margin for our International Markets segment in the first quarter of 2022 increased to 58.1%, compared to 53.0% in the first quarter of 2021. This increase was mainly due to a change in product portfolio mix, price increases largely as a result of rising costs due to inflationary pressure and a positive impact from hedging activity, partially offset by regulatory price reductions and generic competition to
off-patented
products in Japan.
International Markets R&D Expenses
R&D expenses relating to our International Markets segment in the first quarter of 2022 were $20 million, an increase of 12% compared to $18 million in the first quarter of 2021.
For a description of our R&D expenses in the first quarter of 2018,2022, see “—Teva Consolidated Results—Research and Development (R&D) Expenses” below.

Growth

International Markets S&M Expenses

S&M expenses relating to our GrowthInternational Markets segment in the first quarter of 20182022 were $134$97 million, a decreasean increase of 15%1% compared to $158$96 million in the first quarter of 2017. The decrease was mainly due to cost reductions and efficiency measures as part of the restructuring plan.

Growth2021.

International Markets G&A Expenses

G&A expenses relating to our GrowthInternational Markets segment in the first quarter of 20182022 were $41$29 million, a decreasean increase of 15%13% compared to $48$26 million in the first quarter of 2017. The decrease2021.
International Markets Other Income
Other income relating to our International Markets segment in the first quarter of 2022 was $40 million, compared to $2 million in the first quarter of 2021. Other income in the first quarter of 2022 was mainly due to cost reductions as partthe result of the restructuring plan.

Growthsettlement proceeds.

International Markets Profit

The profit of

Profit from our GrowthInternational Markets segment consists of gross profit less R&D expenses, S&M expenses, G&A expenses and any other income related to this segment. Segment profit does not include amortization and certain other items. The data presented for prior periods have been conformed to reflect the changes to our segment reporting commencing in the first quarter of 2018. See note 17 to our consolidated financial statements and “—Teva Consolidated Results—Operating Income” below.

Profit from our GrowthInternational Markets segment in the first quarter of 20182022 was $122$179 million, an increase of 47%, compared to $40$122 million in the first quarter of 2017. The2021. This increase was mainly due to higher revenues,gross profit as well as cost reductions and efficiency measuresother income, as part of the restructuring plan.

During the fourth quarter of 2017, we deconsolidated our subsidiaries in Venezuela from our financial results after concluding that we did not meet the accounting criteria for control over our wholly-owned subsidiaries in Venezuela and that we no longer had significant influence over such subsidiaries. Consequently, results of operations of our subsidiaries in Venezuela are not included in our financial results for the first quarter of 2018. We recorded $21 million in revenues and $3 million in operating income in the first quarter of 2017 with respect to our subsidiaries in Venezuela. We exclude these changes in revenues and operating profit in Venezuela from any discussion of local currency results.

mentioned above.

Other Activities

We have other sources of revenues, primarily our API manufacturing business andthe sale of APIs to third parties, certain contract manufacturing services.services and an
out-licensing
platform offering a portfolio of products to other pharmaceutical companies through our affiliate Medis. Our other activities are not included in our North America, Europe or GrowthInternational Markets segments described above.

Our revenues from other activities in the first quarter of 2018 decreased by 2.6%2022 were $275 million, a decrease of 5% compared to $342 million.the first quarter of 2021. In local currency terms, revenues decreased by 8%, mainly due to lower API sales to third parties.

were flat.

52

Table of Contents
API sales to third parties in the first quarter of 2018 decreased by 9% to $179 million. In2022 were $181 million, an increase of 2% in both U.S. dollars and local currency terms revenues decreased by 10%, mainly duecompared to the timing of certain shipments in the first quarter of 2018.

2021.

Teva Consolidated Results

Revenues

Revenues in the first quarter of 20182022 were $5.1 billion,$3,661 million, a decrease of 10%8%, or 15%5% in local currency terms, compared to the first quarter of 2017,2021. This decrease was mainly due to adverse market dynamicslower revenues in the U.S. generics market,our North America segment primarily related to generic competition to COPAXONE and loss of revenues following our divestment of certain products and discontinuation of certain activities.COPAXONE, partially offset by higher revenues from Anda and generic products in our Europe segment. See “—North America Revenues,” “—Europe Revenues,” “—GrowthInternational Markets Revenues” and “—Other Activities” above.

Exchange rate movements during the first quarter of 2018 in comparison with2022, including hedging effects, negatively impacted revenues by $133 million, compared to the first quarter of 2017 positively impacted revenues by $240 million.

2021. See note 8d to our consolidated financial statements.

Gross Profit

Gross profit in the first quarter of 20182022 was $2.3 billion,$1,740 million, a decrease of 17%7% compared to the first quarter of 2017. The lower gross profit2021. This decrease was mainly a result of the factors discussed above under “—North America Segment—Gross Profit,” “—Europe Segment—Gross Profit” and “—GrowthInternational Markets Segment—Gross Profit” as well as lower remediation expenses and higher accelerated depreciation and inventorystep-upProfit.”
Gross profit margin was 47.5% in the first quarter of 2017, which did not recur2022, compared to 47.2% in the first quarter of 2018.

Gross profit as a percentage of revenues was 46.4% in the first quarter of 2018, compared to 50.2% in the first quarter of 2017.

2021. The decreaseincrease in gross profit margin was mainly driven by our network consolidation activities, as well as a percentage of revenues was mainly due to lower profitabilitychange in North America (5.1 points), the sale ofproduct portfolio mix in our women’s health business (0.9 points) and higher accelerated depreciation (0.4 points),International Markets segment, partially offset by inventorystep-up expenses (1.3 points), higher profitabilitythe unfavorable mix of generic products in Europe (0.9 points)our North America segment and remediation expenses (0.7 points).

lower revenues from COPAXONE.

Research and Development (R&D) Expenses

Net R&D expenses in the first quarter of 2018 were $317 million, a decrease of 27% compared to the first quarter of 2017.

Our R&D activities for generic products in each of our segments include both (i) direct expenses relating to product formulation, analytical method development, stability testing, management of bioequivalence and other clinical studies and regulatory filings; and (ii) indirect expenses, such as costs of internal administration, infrastructure and personnel.

Our R&D activities for specialty and biosimilar products in each of our segments include costs of discovery research, preclinical development, early- and late-clinical development and drug formulation, clinical trials and product registration costs. These expenditures are reported net of contributions received from collaboration partners. Our spending takes place throughout the development process, including (i) early-stage projects in both discovery and preclinical phases; (ii) middle-stage projects in clinical programs up to phase 3; (iii) late-stage projects in phase 3 programs, including where a new drug application is currently pending approval; (iv) life cycle management and post-approval studies for marketed products; and (v) indirect expenses, that support our overall specialty R&D efforts but are not allocated by product or to specific R&D projects, such as the costs of internal administration, infrastructure and personnel.

R&D expenses in the first quarter of 2022 were $225 million, a decrease of 11% compared to the first quarter of 2021.
In the first quarter of 2018,2022, our R&D expenses wererelated primarily related to generic products in our North America segment, as well as specialty product candidates in the pain,neuroscience (such as migraine, movement disorders/ neurodegeneration and neuropsychiatry, including post-approval commitments), immunology (such as respiratory migrainemedicines) and headache therapeutic areas, with additional activities in selected other areas.

areas, as well as generic products including biosimilars.

Our lower R&D expenses in the first quarter of 20182022, compared to the first quarter of 2017 primarily resulted from pipeline optimization and project terminations, phase 3 studies that ended and related headcount reductions, partially offset by higher costs2021, were mainly due to an increasea decrease in phase 3 clinical activity (primarily fasinumab, in collaboration with Regeneron).

neuroscience (in the pain and migraine and headache therapeutic areas), as well as various generics projects.

R&D expenses as a percentage of revenues were 6.3%6.2% in the first quarter of 2018,2022, compared to 7.6%6.4% in the first quarter of 2017.

2021.

53

Table of Contents
Specialty Products Pipeline
Below is a description of key products in our specialty pipeline as of April 20, 2022:
Phase 2
Phase 3
Pre-Submission
Under Regulatory
Review
Novel Biologics
TEV-48574
Inflammatory Bowel Disease
Fasinumab

Osteoarthritic Pain
(March 2016)
 (1)
Small Molecules
Deutetrabenazine
Dyskinesia in Cerebral Palsy
(September 2019)
Risperidone LAI
Schizophrenia
(2)
Digital Respiratory
Digihaler
®
(budesonide and
formoterol
fumarate dihydrate)
(EU)
QVAR
®
 Digihaler
®

(beclomethasone
dipropionate
HFA)(U.S.)
(1)
Developed in collaboration with Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (“Regeneron”). Results for two phase 3 clinical trials, FACT OA1 and FACT OA2, were released on August 5, 2020, indicating that the
co-primary
endpoints for fasinumab 1 mg monthly were achieved. Fasinumab 1 mg monthly demonstrated significant improvements in pain and physical function over placebo at week 16 and week 24, respectively. Fasinumab 1 mg monthly also showed nominally significant benefits in physical function in two trials and pain in one trial, when compared to the maximum
FDA-approved
prescription doses of
non-steroidal
anti-inflammatory drugs for osteoarthritis. The FACT OA1 trial included an additional treatment arm, fasinumab 1 mg every two months, which showed numerical benefit over placebo, but did not reach statistical significance. In initial safety analyses from the phase 3 trials, there was an increase in arthropathies reported with fasinumab. In a
sub-group
of patients from one phase 3 long-term safety trial, there was an increase in joint replacement with fasinumab 1 mg monthly treatment during the
off-drug
follow-up
period, although this increase was not seen in the other trials to date.
Active treatment of patients with fasinumab, which only involved dosing in an optional second-year extension phase of one trial, has been discontinued following a recommendation from the fasinumab program’s Independent Data Monitoring Committee that the program should be terminated, based on available evidence obtained to date. The core efficacy data has already been obtained to support potential fasinumab regulatory filings. Long-term safety data is expected to be discussed with the FDA in 2022.
Currently, all
non-essential
activities and related expenditures for fasinumab have been put on hold. Next steps will be assessed together with Regeneron, with the intention of discussing data with the FDA.
(2)
Developed under a license agreement with MedinCell. In August 2021, the FDA accepted the NDA for risperidone LAI, based on phase 3 data from two pivotal studies. In April 2022, the FDA issued a Complete Response Letter (“CRL”) regarding the NDA for risperidone LAI. We are reviewing our next steps based on the CRL and will work closely with the FDA to address their recommendations.
Discontinued Project
During the first quarter of 2022, development of
TEV-53275
was discontinued.
Biosimilar Products Pipeline
We have additional biosimilar products in development internally and with our partners that are in various stages of clinical trials and regulatory review worldwide, including phase 3 clinical trials for biosimilars to Prolia
®
(denosumab), Stelara
®
(ustekinumab), Xolair
®
(omalizumab) and Eylea
®
(afilbercept), a biosimilar to Lucentis
®
(ranibizumab) that is currently under regulatory review in Europe and is in
pre-submission
in Canada, as well as a biosimilar to Humira
®
(adalimumab) that is currently under U.S. regulatory review.
54

Table of Contents
Selling and Marketing (S&M) Expenses

S&M expenses in the first quarter of 20182022 were $771$584 million, a decrease of 20%flat compared to the first quarter of 2017. Our S&M expenses were primarily the2021. This was mainly a result of the factors discussed above under “—North America Segment— S&M Expenses,” “—Europe Segment— S&M Expenses” and “—Growth MarketsEurope Segment—S&M Expenses.”

Expenses”.

S&M expenses as a percentage of revenues were 15%15.9% in the first quarter of 2018,2022, compared to 17%14.7% in the first quarter of 2017.

2021.

General and Administrative (G&A) Expenses

G&A expenses in the first quarter of 20182022 were $329$296 million, a decreasean increase of 10%2% compared to the first quarter of 2017. Our G&A expenses were primarily the result of the factors discussed above under “—North America Segment— G&A Expenses,” “—Europe Segment— G&A Expenses” and “—Growth Markets Segment— G&A Expenses,” as well as cost reductions in certain corporate functions as part of the restructuring plan.

2021.

G&A expenses as a percentage of revenues were 6.5%8.1% in the first quarter of 2018, flat2022, compared to 7.3% in the first quarter of 2017.

2021.

Intangible Asset Impairments
We recorded expenses of $149 million for identifiable intangible asset impairments in the first quarter of 2022, compared to expenses of $79 million in the first quarter of 2021. See note 5 to our consolidated financial statements.
Goodwill Impairment
No goodwill impairments were recorded in the first quarters of 2022 and 2021.
Other Asset Impairments, Restructuring and Other Items

We recorded expenses of $707$128 million for other asset impairments, restructuring and other items in the first quarter of 2018,2022, compared to expenses of $240$137 million in the first quarter of 2017. The expenses in the first quarter2021. For further details, as well as a description of 2018 consisted of:

Impairments

Impairments of long-lived intangible assets in the first quarter of 2018 were $206 million, mainly consisting of:

a)Identifiable IPR&D of $117 million mainly related to revaluation of generic products acquired from Actavis Generics due to development progress and changes in other key valuation indications (market size, legal landscape, launch date or discount rate).

b)Identifiable product rights of $76 million due to revaluation of Actavis Generics product rights in the United States.

Impairments of property, plantsignificant regulatory and equipment in the first quarter of 2018 were $226 million, mainly consisting of:

$147 million related to restructuring costs, including:

$113 million related to site closures in Israel; and

$34 million related to headquarters and distribution sites consolidation in the United States;

Other impairment costs, mainly $56 million related to a plant located in India in connection with the P&G separation agreement. Seeother events, see note 312 to our consolidated financial statements.

Restructuring

Legal Settlements and Loss Contingencies
In the first quarter of 2018,2022, we recorded $247expenses of $1,124 million of restructuring expenses,in legal settlements and loss contingencies, compared to $130an expense of $104 million in the first quarter of 2017. The expenses in the first quarter of 2018 were primarily related to headcount reductions across all functions.

Since announcing our restructuring plan, we reduced our global headcount by approximately 6,200 full-time-equivalent employees.

Goodwill Impairment

In the first quarter of 2018, we recorded a goodwill impairment of $180 million. This impairment was driven by the change in fair value, including the discount rate and the change in allocated net assets to the Rimsa reporting unit.2021. See note 79 to our consolidated financial statements.

Legal Settlements and Loss Contingencies

In the first quarter of 2018, we recorded income of $1.3 billion, compared to an expense of $20 million in the first quarter of 2017. The income in the first quarter of 2018 consisted primarily of the working capital adjustment with Allergan, the Rimsa settlement and a reversal of the reserve recorded in the second quarter of 2017 with respect to the carvedilol patent litigation, following the reversal of the verdict granting the award to GSK (see note 16 to our consolidated financial statements).

Other Income

Other income in the first quarter of 20182022 was $203$52 million, compared to $72$5 million in the first quarter of 2017.2021. Other income in the first quarter of 2022 was primarilymainly the result of settlement proceeds in our International Markets segment.
Operating Income (Loss)
Operating loss was $713 million in the factors discussed above under “—North America Segment— Other Income,” as wellfirst quarter of 2022, compared to an operating income of $434 million in the first quarter of 2021.
Operating loss as a $93 million net gain relatedpercentage of revenues was 19.5% in the first quarter of 2022, compared to the divestment of our women’s health business.

Otheroperating income as a percentage of revenues was 4.0%of 10.9% in the first quarter of 2018, compared to 1.3%2021. Operating loss in the first quarter of 2017.

Operating Income

Operating income2022 was $1.5 billion in the first quarter of 2018, compared to $895mainly affected by legal settlements and loss contingencies.

Financial Expenses, Net
Financial expenses were $258 million in the first quarter of 2017.

The increase2022, compared to $290 million in operating income was mainly due to income from legal settlements and loss contingencies, higher operating income in our Europe and Growth Markets segments and net gain from the sale of our women’s health business during the first quarter of 2018, partially offset by higher other asset impairments, restructuring2021. Financial expenses in the first quarter of 2022 were mainly comprised of interest expenses of $238 million. Financial expenses in the first quarter of 2021 were mainly comprised of interest expenses of $239 million and other items, a goodwill impairment and lower operating income in our North America segment.

loss on revaluations of marketable securities of $64 million.

55

Table of Contents
The following table presents a reconciliation of our segment profits to our consolidated operating income (loss) and to consolidated income (loss) before income taxes for the three months ended March 31, 20182022 and 2017:

   Three months ended
March 31,
 
   2018   2017 
   (U.S.$ in millions) 

North America profit

  $915   $1,306 

Europe profit

   377    268 

Growth Markets profit

   122    40 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total segment profit

   1,414    1,614 

Profit of other activities

   21    7 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 
   1,435    1,621 

Amounts not allocated to segments:

    

Amortization

   310    320 

Other asset impairments, restructuring and other items

   707    240 

Goodwill impairment

   180    —   

Gain on divestitures, net of divestitures related costs

   (93   —   

Inventorystep-up

   —      64 

Other R&D expenses

   22    —   

Costs related to regulatory actions taken in facilities

   1    34 

Legal settlements and loss contingencies

   (1,278   20 

Other unallocated amounts

   61    48 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Consolidated operating income

   1,525    895 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Financial expenses - net

   271    207 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Consolidated income before income taxes

  $1,254   $688 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

The increase in operating margin was 14.2 points, mainly due to legal settlements and loss contingencies (25.6 points), higher profits in our Europe (2.7 points) and Growth Markets (1.7 points) segments and the sale of our women’s health business (1.8 points), partially offset by higher other asset impairments, restructuring and other items (9.7 points), goodwill impairment (3.6 points) and lower profit in our North America segment (5.1 points).

During the fourth quarter of 2017, we deconsolidated our subsidiaries in Venezuela from our financial results. Consequently, results of operations of our subsidiaries in Venezuela are not included in our financial results for the first quarter of 2018.

Financial Expenses, Net

Financial expenses were $271 million in the first quarter of 2018, compared to $207 million in the first quarter of 2017. The increase was mainly due to $60 million of early redemption charges and accelerated amortization of issuance costs related to the repayment of senior notes and term loans, partially offset by a $29 million gain derived from net foreign exchange losses and financial derivatives during the first quarter of 2018, compared to a $36 million gain from the sale of Mylan shares during the first quarter of 2017.

2021:

   
Three months ended
 
   
March 31,
 
   
2022
   
2021
 
   
(U.S. $ in millions)
 
North America profit
  $402   $577 
Europe profit
   381    338 
International Markets profit
   179    122 
  
 
 
   
 
 
 
Total reportable segments profit
   962    1,036 
Profit of other activities
   52    41 
  
 
 
   
 
 
 
Total segments profit
   1,013    1,077 
Amounts not allocated to segments:
    
Amortization
   200    242 
Other assets impairments, restructuring and other items
   128    137 
Intangible assets impairments
   149    79 
Legal settlements and loss contingencies
   1,124    104 
Other unallocated amounts
   127    82 
  
 
 
   
 
 
 
Consolidated operating income (loss)
   (713   434 
  
 
 
   
 
 
 
Financial expenses, net
   258    290 
  
 
 
   
 
 
 
Consolidated income (loss) before income taxes
  $(971  $144 
  
 
 
   
 
 
 
Tax Rate

In the first quarter of 2018, income taxes were $462022, we recognized a tax expense of $2 million, or 4%, on
pre-tax income
loss of $1.3 billion.$971 million. In the first quarter of 2017, income taxes were $542021, we recognized a tax expense of $62 million, or 8%, on
pre-tax
income of $688$144 million. Our tax rate for the first quarter of 20182022 was mainly affected byone-time legal settlementssettlement charges, adjustments to valuation allowances on deferred tax assets and divestments that had a low corresponding tax effect.

The statutory Israeli corporate tax rate is 23% in 2018. Our tax rate differs from the Israeli statutory tax rate mainly dueinterest expense disallowances. See note 11 to the mix of profits generated in various jurisdictions where tax rates are different than the Israeli tax rate, tax benefits in Israel and other countries, as well as infrequent or nonrecurring items.

In future years, our effective tax rate is expected to increase following the enactment of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act in the United States.

consolidated financial statements.

Share inIn (Profits) Losses of Associated Companies, Net

Share in lossesprofits of associated companies, net in the first quarter of 20182022 was $74$21 million, compared to share in profits of $7$3 million in the first quarter of 2017.2021. The lossshare in profits of associated companies, net in the first quarter of 2018 is2022 was mainly due to a $94 million impairment related to the difference between the book value of our investment in New Chapter Inc.Novetide and its fair value as of the date we completed its acquisition in connection with the P&G separation agreement.

January 2022.

Net Income

Net income attributable (Loss) Attributable to Teva

Net loss was $1.1 billion in the first quarter of 2018, compared to $645$955 million in the first quarter of 2017. The increase was mainly due to the factors previously discussed in “—Operating Income” above, partially offset by factors previously discussed in “—Financial Expenses, Net” and “—Share in (Profits) Losses of Associated Companies, Net.”

Net income attributable to ordinary shareholders was $1.1 billion in the first quarter of 2018,2022, compared to $580net income of $77 million in the first quarter of 2017. The difference from net income attributable to Teva is due to the aforementioned factors.

2021.

Diluted Shares Outstanding and Earnings Per(Loss) per Share

The weighted average diluted shares outstanding used for the fully diluted share calculationcalculations for both the three months ended March 31, 20182022 and 20172021 were 1,0201,107 million and 1,017 million shares, respectively.

shares.

Diluted earningsloss per share for the three months ended March 31, 2018 and 2017 take into account the potential dilution that could occur upon the exercise of options andnon-vested RSUs granted under employee stock compensation plans, using the treasury stock method.

Additionally, no account was taken of the potential dilution by the mandatory convertible preferred shares, amounting to 64 million (including shares that may be issued due to unpaid dividends to date) for the three months ended March 31, 2018 and 59 million for the three months ended March 31, 2017, as well as for the convertible senior debentures for the respective periods, since both had an anti-dilutive effect on earnings per share.

Diluted earnings per share were $1.03$0.86 in the first quarter of 2018,2022, compared to $0.57diluted earnings per share of $0.07 in the first quarter of 2017.

2021. See note 13 to our consolidated financial statements.

Share Count for Market Capitalization

We calculate share amounts using the outstanding number of shares (i.e., excluding treasury shares) plus shares that would be outstanding upon the exercise of options and vesting of RSUs and performance share units (“PSUs”), as well asPSUs and the conversion of our convertible senior debentures, and mandatory convertible preferred shares, in each case, at period end.

As of March 31, 20182022 and 2017,2021, the fully diluted share count for purposes of calculating our market capitalization was approximately 1,0951,145 million and 1,0821,130 million, respectively.

56

Table of Contents
Impact of Currency Fluctuations on Results of Operations

In the first quarter of 2018,2022, approximately 51%48% of our revenues came from sales outside ofwere denominated in currencies other than the United States.U.S. dollar. Because our results are reported in U.S. dollars, we are subject to significant foreign currency risks and, accordingly,risks. Accordingly, changes in the rate of exchange rate between the U.S. dollar and the local currencies in the markets in which we operate (primarily the euro, Japanese yen, new Israeli shekel, British pound, Canadian dollar, Russian ruble, new Israeli shekel and Polish zloty)Japanese yen) impact our results.
During the first quarter of 2018,2022, the following main currencies relevant to our operations decreased in value against the U.S. dollar (each on an annuala quarterly average compared to annualquarterly average basis): ArgentineanTurkish lira by 47%, Argentinian peso by 20%17%, Russian ruble by 14%, Chilean peso by 11%, Swedish krona by 10% and Japanese yen by 9%. During the first quarter of 2018, theThe following main currencies relevant to our operations increased in value against the U.S. dollar: euroBrazilian real by 15%, British pound by 12%, new4% and Israeli shekel by 8%, Polish zloty by 19%, Japanese yen by 5%, Canadian dollar by 5%, Hungarian forint by 15%, Chilean peso by 9%, Swiss franc by 6% and Russian ruble by 3%2%.

As a result, exchange rate movements during the first quarter of 2018, in comparison with2022, including hedging effects, negatively impacted overall revenues by $133 million and operating income by $56 million, compared to the first quarter of 2017, positively impacted overall2021.
In the first quarter of 2022, a positive hedging impact of $19 million was recognized under revenues, by $240and a minimal positive impact was recognized under cost of sales. In the first quarter of 2021, a positive hedging impact of $28 million was recognized under revenues and a minimal negative impact was recognized under cost of sales.
Hedging transactions against future projected revenues and expenses are recognized on the balance sheet at their fair value on a quarterly basis, while the foreign exchange impact on the underlying revenues and expenses may occur in subsequent quarters. See note 8d to our operating income by $37 million.

consolidated financial statements.

Commencing in the third quarter of 2018, the cumulative inflation in Argentina exceeded 100% or more over a three-year period. Although this triggered highly inflationary accounting treatment, it did not have a material impact on our results of operations.
Liquidity and Capital Resources

Total balance sheet assets were $69.2 billion$47,059 million as of March 31, 2018,2022, compared to $70.6 billion$47,666 million as of December 31, 2017.

Trade receivables as of March 31, 2018, net of sales reserves and allowances (“SR&A”), were negative $1.1 billion, compared to negative $0.8 billion as of December 31, 2017, mainly due to the decrease in sales in the first quarter of 2018, compared with the fourth quarter of 2017.

As of March 31, 2018, we do not present any material assets held for sale following the completion of the sale of our woman’s health business. As of December 31, 2017, we presented net assets held for sale in the amount of $0.6 billion.

Accrued expenses as of March 31, 2018 were $2.6 billion, compared to $3.0 billion as of December 31, 2017. The decrease was mainly due to $0.4 billion in connection with legal settlements.

2021.

Our working capital balance, which includes tradeaccounts receivables net of SR&A, inventories, prepaid expenses and other current assets, tradeaccounts payables, employee-related obligations, accrued expenses and other current liabilities, was negative $0.2 billion$727 million as of March 31, 2018,2022, compared to negative $0.4 billion$787 million as of December 31, 2017.

Investment2021. This decrease was mainly due to an update to the estimated settlement provision recorded in connection with the remaining opioid cases, offset by an increase in inventory levels and accounts receivables net of SR&A.

Employee-related obligations, as of March 31, 2022 were $481 million, compared to $563 million as of December 31, 2021. The decrease in the first quarter of 2022 was mainly due to performance incentive payments to employees for 2021.
Cash investment in property, plant and equipment in the first quarter of 20182022 was approximately $0.2 billion, flat$157 million, compared to the fourth quarter of 2017. Depreciation was $0.2 billion$150 million in the first quarter of 2018, flat2021. Depreciation in the first quarter of 2022 was $123 million, compared to $134 million in the fourthfirst quarter of 2017.

2021.

Cash and cash equivalents and short-term and long-term investments as of March 31, 20182022 were $1.5 billion,$2,199 million, compared to $1.1 billion$2,191 million as of December 31, 2017, mainly due to proceeds from the issuance of senior notes in March 2018, proceeds from the sale of our women’s health business, proceeds from the working capital adjustment with Allergan and the legal settlement with Rimsa, as well as other free cash flow generated during the quarter, offset by debt prepayments as discussed below.

2021.

Our cash on hand that is not used for ongoing operations is generally invested in bank deposits as well as liquid securities that bear fixed and floating rates.

57

Table of Contents
Our principal sources of short-term liquidity are our cash on hand, existing cash investments, liquid securities and available credit facilities, primarily, our $3 billion syndicated revolving line of credit, which was not utilized as of March 31, 2018, as well as internally generated funds,2022, our $2.3 billion unsecured syndicated revolving credit facility entered into in April 2019, which was replaced in April 2022 (“RCF”).
In April 2022, we believe are sufficiententered into an unsecured syndicated sustainability-linked revolving credit facility of $1.8 billion with a maturity date of April 2026, with two one-year extension options. The RCF contains certain covenants, including certain limitations on incurring liens and indebtedness and maintenance of certain financial ratios, including a maximum leverage ratio, which becomes more restrictive over time. In addition, the RCF is linked to meet ouron-going operating needs.

2018 Debt Balancetwo sustainability performance targets, (i) the company’s S&P ESG Score and Movements

(ii) number of new regulatory submissions in low and middle-income countries. The RCF margin may increase or decrease depending on the Company’s sustainability performance.

Under the terms of the RCF, the leverage ratio shall not exceed 4.50x in the second and third quarters of 2022, 4.25x in the fourth quarter of 2022, 4.00x in the first, second and third quarters of 2023, 3.75x in the fourth quarter of 2023 and 3.50x in 2024 and onwards.
The RCF can be used for general corporate purposes, including repaying existing debt. As of March 31, 2018,2022 and as of the date of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, no amounts were outstanding under the RCF.
Based on current and forecasted results, we expect that we will not exceed the financial covenant thresholds set forth in the RCF within one year from the date the financial statements are issued.
Under specified circumstances, including non-compliance with any of the covenants described above and the unavailability of any waiver, amendment or other modification thereto, we will not be able to borrow under the RCF. Additionally, violations of the covenants, under the abovementioned circumstances, would result in an event of default in all borrowings under the RCF and, when greater than a specified threshold amount as set forth in each series of senior notes and sustainability-linked senior notes is outstanding, could lead to an event of default under our senior notes and sustainability-linked senior notes, due to cross acceleration provisions.
We expect that we will continue to have sufficient cash resources to support our debt service payments and all other financial obligations within one year from the date that the financial statements are issued.
Debt Balance and Movements
As of March 31, 2022, our debt was $30.8 billion,$22,917 million, compared to $32.5 billion$23,043 million as of December 31, 2017. The2021. This decrease was mainly due to $6.5 billion of debt prepayments, partially offset by our March 2018 issuance of an aggregate principal amount of $4.4 billion of senior notes, as well as exchange rate fluctuations.

In January 2018 we prepaid in full $15 million of our U.S. dollar debentures.

During the first quarter of 2018, we prepaid in full $2.3 billion of our3-year and5-year U.S. dollar term loans, as well as JPY 156.8 billion of our term loans.

In March 2018, we completed debt issuances for an aggregate principal amount of $4.4 billion, consisting of senior notes with aggregate principal amounts of $2.5 billion and €1.6 billion with maturities ranging from four to ten years. The effective average interest rate of the notes issued is 5.3% per annum. See note 11 to our consolidated financial statements.

In March 2018, we redeemed in full our $1.5 billion 1.4% senior notes due in July 2018 and our Euro 1.0 billion 2.875% senior notes due in April 2019.

Our debt as of March 31, 20182022 was effectively denominated in the following currencies: 63%61% in U.S. dollars, 32%36% in euros and 5%3% in Swiss francs.

The portion of total debt classified as short-term as of March 31, 20182022 was 4%9%, compared to 11%6% as of December 31, 2017, mainly due to the activities described above.

2021.

Our financial leverage was 60%69% as of March 31, 2018,2022, compared to 63%67% as of December 31, 2017.

2021.

Our average debt maturity was approximately 7.36.2 years as of March 31, 2018,2022, compared to 6.4 years as of December 31, 2017.

2021.

Total Equity

Total equity was $20.1 billion$10,260 million as of March 31, 2018,2022, compared to $18.7 billion$11,244 million as of December 31, 2017. The increase2021. This decrease was mainly due to $1.1 billiona net loss of net income during the quarter$952 million and $239 million positivea negative impact of $64 million from exchange rate fluctuations.

Exchange rate fluctuations affected our balance sheet, as approximately 61%55% of our net assets in the first quarter of 20182022 (including both
non-monetary
and monetary assets) were in currencies other than the U.S. dollar. When compared to December 31, 2017,2021, changes in currency rates had a positivenegative impact of $330$64 million on our equity as of March 31, 2018,2022, mainly due to the changechanges in value against the U.S. dollar of: the euroRussian ruble by (3%)12%, the Turkish lira by 11%, the Chilean peso by 7%, the Peruvian sol by 7%, the Japanese yen by 6%, the Mexican peso by (8%), the Japanese Yen by (6%)3%, the British pound by (4%)3%, the Polish zloty by (2%)3%, the Croatian kuna by 2% and the Bulgarian leveuro by (3%)1%. All comparisons are on a
quarter-end
to
quarter-end
basis.

Cash Flow

We seek to continually improve the efficiency of our working capital management. From time to time, as part of our cash and commercial relationship management activities, we may make decisions in our commercial and supply chain activities which may drive an acceleration of receivable payments from customers or deceleration of payments to vendors, having the effect of increasing or decreasing cash from operations in an individual period. Such decisions may have an impact on our annual operating cash flow measurement, as well as on our quarterly results.
58

Table of Contents
Cash flow generated fromused in operating activities during the first quarter of 20182022 was $1.5 billion,$49 million, compared to $0.1 billion$405 million in the first quarter of 2017.2021. The increase was mainly due to proceeds from the working capital adjustment with Allergan and the legal settlement with Rimsa, compared to payments made to the SEC and DOJ related to the FCPA settlementlower cash flow used in the first quarter of 2017.

Cash flow generated from operating activities in the first quarter of 2018,2022 was mainly due to changes in working capital items resulting from a decrease in accounts receivables net of SR&A in connection with the decrease in revenues.

During the first quarter of 2022, we generated free cash flow of $117 million, which we define as comprising $49 million in cash flow used for capital investments andin operating activities, $305 million in beneficial interest collected in exchange for securitized tradeaccounts receivables was $1.9 billion, compared to $0.3 billionand $25 million in proceeds from divestitures of businesses and other assets, partially offset by $157 million in cash used for capital investment and $7 million in cash used for acquisition of businesses, net of cash acquired. During the first quarter of 2017. The increase was mainly due to the increase2021, we generated free cash flow of $59 million, comprising $405 million in cash flow generated from operating activities, as well as lower net capital investments and higher$476 million in beneficial interest collected in exchange for securitized trade receivables.

accounts receivables and $138 million in proceeds from sale of property, plant and equipment and intangible assets, partially offset by $150 million in cash used for capital investment. The increase in the first quarter of 2022 resulted mainly from lower cash flow used in operating activities, partially offset by lower sales of assets.

Dividends

In December 2017, we announced an immediate suspension of

We have not paid dividends on our ordinary shares andor ADSs and that dividends on our mandatory convertible preferred shares will be evaluated on a quarterly basis per current practice.

We have suspended cash dividends on our mandatory convertible preferred shares in the first quarter of 2018 due to our accumulated deficit.

since December 2017.

Commitments

In addition to financing obligations under short-term debt and long-term senior notes and loans, debentures and convertible debentures, our major contractual obligations and commercial commitments include leases, royalty payments, contingent payments pursuant to acquisition agreements and participation in joint ventures associated with R&D activities.

In October 2021, Teva announced a license agreement with Modag that will provide Teva an exclusive global license to develop, manufacture and commercialize Modag’s lead compound
(TEV-56286)
and a related compound
(TEV-56287).
TEV-56286
was initially developed for the treatment of Multiple System Atrophy (MSA) and Parkinson’s disease, and has the potential to be applied to other treatments for neurodegenerative disorders, such as Alzheimer’s disease. A phase 1b clinical trial is currently being completed for
TEV-56286.
In the fourth quarter of 2021, Teva made an upfront payment of $10 million to Modag that was recorded as R&D expense. Modag may be eligible for future development milestone payments, totaling an aggregate amount of up to $70 million, as well as future commercial milestones and royalties.
In August 2020, Teva entered into an agreement with biopharmaceutical company Alvotech for the exclusive commercialization in the U.S. of five biosimilar product candidates. The initial pipeline for this collaboration contains biosimilar candidates addressing multiple therapeutic areas, including a proposed biosimilar to Humira
®
. Under this agreement, Alvotech is responsible for the development, registration and supply of the biosimilar product candidates and Teva will exclusively commercialize the products in the United States. Teva paid an upfront payment in the third quarter of 2020 and additional upfront and milestone payments in the second quarter of 2021 that were recorded as R&D expenses. Additional development and commercial milestone payments of up to $455 million, as well as royalty payments, may be payable by Teva over the next few years. Teva and Alvotech will share profit from the commercialization of these biosimilars. In March 2021, Abbvie sued Alvotech for allegedly misappropriating confidential information relating to Humira
®
. In October 2021, the claim was dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Abbvie has appealed this decision to the U.S. Court of Appeals. In addition, there is pending patent litigation between Abbvie and Alvotech related to Alvotech’s proposed biosimilar to Humira
®
. In December 2021, Abbvie also filed a complaint with the ITC against both Alvotech and Teva seeking to prevent Teva and Alvotech from importing Alvotech’s proposed biosimilar to Humira
®
into the United States. On January 26, 2022, the ITC issued a decision to initiate an investigation into Alvotech’s proposed biosimilar product. On March 8, 2022, Abbvie and Alvotech settled all the above pending IP matters relating to Alvotech’s proposed biosimilar to Humira
®
. Pursuant to that settlement, Alvotech and Teva may sell Alvotech’s proposed biosimilar to Humira
®
in the United States beginning on July 1, 2023, provided that U.S. regulatory approval is obtained by that date. On March 28, 2022, the ITC officially terminated the investigation requested by Abbvie.
In September 2016, weTeva and Regeneron entered into ana collaborative agreement to develop and commercialize Regeneron’s pain medication product, fasinumab. We paidTeva and Regeneron $250 million upfront and will share equally with Regeneron in the global commercial benefits ofrights to this product (excluding Japan, Korea and nine other Asian countries), as well as ongoing associated R&D costs of approximately $1.0$1 billion.

Teva made an upfront payment of $250 million to Regeneron in the third quarter of 2016 and additional payments for achievement of development milestones in an aggregate amount of $120 million were paid during 2017 and 2018. The agreement stipulates additional development and commercial milestone

59

Table of Contents
payments of up to $2,230 million, as well as future royalties. Currently, all
non-essential
activities and related expenditures for fasinumab have been put on hold. Next steps will be assessed together with Regeneron, with the intention of discussing data with the FDA.
In October 2016, weNovember 2013, Teva entered into an exclusive partnershipagreement with Celltrion to commercialize two of Celltrion’s biosimilar products in developmentMedinCell for the U.S.development and Canadian markets. We paid Celltrion $160 million, of which up to $60 million is refundable or creditable under certain circumstances. We will share the profit from the commercialization of these products with Celltrion.

In September 2017, we entered into a partnership agreement with Nuvelutionmultiple long-acting injectable products. The lead product candidate selected was risperidone LAI

(TV-46000)
suspension for development of AUSTEDOsubcutaneous use for the treatment of Tourette syndrome in pediatric patients inschizophrenia. In August 2021, the United States. Nuvelution will fund and manageFDA accepted the NDA for risperidone LAI, based on phase 3 data from two pivotal studies. Teva leads the clinical development driving all operational aspects of the phase 3 program, and we will lead the regulatory process and beis responsible for commercialization. Uponcommercialization of this product candidate. MedinCell may be eligible for development milestones, and future commercial milestones of up to $112 million in respect of risperidone LAI. Teva will also pay MedinCell royalties on net sales. In April 2022, the FDA approval of AUSTEDOissued a CRL regarding the NDA for Tourette syndrome, we will pay Nuvelution apre-agreed return.

Dividends on our mandatory convertible preferred shares (aggregate liquidation preference of approximately $3.7 billion) are payable on a cumulative basis when, as and if declared by our Board of Directors at an annual rate of 7%risperidone LAI. Teva is reviewing its next steps based on the liquidation preference of $1,000 per mandatory convertible preferred share. Declared dividends are paid in cash on March 15, June 15, September 15CRL and December 15 of each yearwill work closely with the FDA to and including December 15, 2018. We have suspended cash dividend payments on our mandatory convertible preferred shares.

address their recommendations.

We are committed to paypaying royalties to owners of
know-how,
partners in alliances and certain other arrangements, and to parties that financed R&D at a wide range of rates as a percentage of sales of certain products, as defined in the agreements. In some cases, the royalty period is not defined; in other cases, royalties will be paid over various periods not exceeding 20 years.

In connection with certain development, supply and marketing, and research and collaboration or services agreements, we are required to indemnify, in unspecified amounts, the parties to such agreements against third-party claims relating to (i) infringement or violation of intellectual property or other rights of such third party; or (ii) damages to users of the related products. Except as described in our financial statements, we are not aware of any material pending action that may result in the counterparties to these agreements claiming such indemnification.

Our principal sources of short-term liquidity are our existing cash investments, liquid securities and available credit facilities, primarily our $3 billion syndicated revolving credit facility (“RCF”), which was not utilized as of March 31, 2018, as well as internally generated funds.

Pursuant to the requirements of the RCF, we have entered into negative pledge agreements with certain banks and institutional investors. Under the agreements, we and certain subsidiaries have undertaken not to register floating charges on assets in favor of any third parties without the prior consent of the banks, to maintain certain financial ratios, including the requirement to maintain compliance with a net debt to EBITDA ratio, which becomes more restrictive over time, and to fulfill other restrictions, as stipulated by the agreements. As of March 31, 2018, we did not have any outstanding debt under the RCF, which is our only debt subject to the net debt to EBITDA covenant. Assuming utilization of the RCF and under specified circumstances, includingnon-compliance with such covenants and the unavailability of any waiver, amendment or other modification thereto and the expiration of any applicable grace period thereto, substantially all of our other debt could be negatively impacted bynon-compliance with such covenants. We have sufficient resources to meet our financial obligations in the ordinary course of business for at least twelve months from the date of the release of this Quarterly Report.

2018

2022 Aggregated Contractual Obligations

There have not been any material changes in our assessment of material contractual obligations and commitments as set forth in Item 7 of our Annual Report on Form
10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2017, other than as set forth below. These changes are the result of the significant debt movements during the first quarter of 2018, as described under “—2018 Debt Balance and Movements” above.

In the first quarter of 2018, we repaid debt in a total amount of approximately $6.5 billion and raised new debt in a total amount of approximately $4.4 billion. As of March 31, 2018, the total debt on the balance sheet is approximately $30.8 billion. See note 11 to our consolidated financial statements.

2021.

Supplemental
Non-GAAP
Income Data

We utilize certain
non-GAAP
financial measures to evaluate performance, in conjunction with other performance metrics. The following are examples of how we utilize the
non-GAAP
measures:

our management and Board of Directors use the
non-GAAP
measures to evaluate our operational performance, to compare against work plans and budgets, and ultimately to evaluate the performance of management;

our annual budgets are prepared on a
non-GAAP
basis; and

senior management’s annual compensation is derived, in part, using these
non-GAAP
measures. While qualitative factors and judgment also affect annual bonuses, the principal quantitative element in the determination of such bonuses is performance targets tied to the work plan, and thuswhich is based on the
non-GAAP
presentation set forth below.

Non-GAAP
financial measures have no standardized meaning and accordingly have limitations in their usefulness to investors. We provide such
non-GAAP
data because management believes that such data provide useful information to investors. However, investors are cautioned that, unlike financial measures prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP,
non-GAAP
measures may not be comparable with the calculation of similar measures for other companies. These
non-GAAP
financial measures are presented solely to permit investors to more fully understand how management assesses our performance. The limitations of using these
non-GAAP
financial measures as performance measures are that they provide a view of our results of operations without including all events during a period and may not provide a comparable view of our performance to other companies in the pharmaceutical industry.

Investors should consider
non-GAAP
financial measures in addition to, and not as replacements for, or superior to, measures of financial performance prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP.

In arriving at our
non-GAAP
presentation, we exclude items that either have a
non-recurring
impact on the income statement or which, in the judgment of our management, are items that, either as a result of their nature or size, could, were they not singled out, potentially cause investors to extrapolate future performance from an improper base. In
60

Table of Contents
addition, we also exclude equity compensation expenses to facilitate a better understanding of our financial results, since we believe that thissuch exclusion is important for understanding the trends in our financial results and that these expenses do not affect our business operations. While not all inclusive, examples of these items include:

amortization of purchased intangible assets;

legal settlements and material litigation fees and/or loss contingencies, due to the difficulty in predicting their timing and size;scope;

impairments of long-lived assets, including intangibles, property, plant and equipment and goodwill;

restructuring expenses, including severance, retention costs, contract cancellation costs and certain accelerated depreciation expenses primarily related to the rationalization of our plants or to certain other strategic activities, such as the realignment of R&D focus or other similar activities;

acquisition
acquisition- or divestmentdivestment- related items, including changes in contingent consideration, integration costs, banker and other professional fees and inventorystep-up andin-process R&D acquired in development arrangements;
step-up;

expenses related to our equity compensation;

significant
one-time
financing costs, amortization of issuance costs and devaluation terminated derivative instruments, and marketable securities investment valuation gains/losses;

deconsolidation charges;

material
unusual tax and items;
other awards or settlements, bothsettlement amounts, either paid andor received;

other exceptional items that we believe are sufficiently large that their exclusion is important to facilitate an understanding of trends in our financial results, such as impacts due to changes in accounting, significant costs for remediation of plants, such as inventory write-offs or related consulting costs, or other unusual events; and

corresponding tax effects of the foregoing items.

Commencing the first quarter of 2022, we no longer exclude IPR&D acquired in development arrangements from our
non-GAAP
financial measures. In our comparable
non-GAAP
financial measures for the first quarter of 2021, we excluded $5 million IPR&D acquired in development arrangements. We are not recasting the non-GAAP presentation for the first quarter of 2021 since the adjustment is not significant. We are making this change to our presentation of non-GAAP financial measures to improve comparability of our non GAAP presentation to those of other companies in the pharmaceutical industry that are making a similar change to their presentations beginning in the first quarter of 2022.
The following tables present supplemental
non-GAAP
data, in U.S. dollars,dollar, which we believe facilitates an understanding of the factors affecting our business. In these tables, we exclude the following amounts:

   Three Months Ended
March 31,
 
   2018   2017 
   (U.S. $ in millions) 

Gain on divestitures, net of divestitures related costs

   (93   —   

Amortization of purchased intangible assets

   310    320 

Restructuring expenses

   247    130 

Inventorystep-up

   —      64 

Capital loss from currency translation

   —      52 

Equity compensation expenses

   30    36 

Costs related to regulatory actions taken in facilities

   1    34 

Acquisition, integration and related expenses

   2    23 

Other R&D expenses

   22    —   

Contingent consideration

   8    21 

Legal settlements and loss contingencies

   (1,278   20 

Goodwill impairment

   180    —   

Impairment of long-lived assets

   432    11 

Othernon-GAAP items

   49    15 

Financial expense (income)

   68    (28

Minority interest

   (8   (13

Impairments of equity investments

   94    —   

Tax effect

   (165   (186

The data so presented — after these exclusions — are the results used by management and our board

61

Table of directors to evaluate our operational performance, to compare against work plans and budgets, and ultimately to evaluate the performance of management. For example, each year we prepare a detailed work plan for the next fiscal year. This work plan is used to manage the business and is the plan against which management’s performance is measured. All such plans are prepared on a basis comparable to the presentation below, in that none of the plans take into account those elements that are factored out in ournon-GAAP presentations. In addition, at quarterly meetings of the Board at which management provides financial updates to the Board, presentations are made comparing the current fiscal quarterly results against: (i) the comparable quarter of the prior year, (ii) the immediately preceding fiscal quarter and (iii) the work plan. Such presentations are based upon thenon-GAAP approach reflected in the tables below. Moreover, while there are always qualitative factors and elements of judgment involved in the granting of annual cash bonuses, the principal quantitative element in the determination of such bonuses is performance targets tied to the work plan and thus, tied to the samenon-GAAP presentation as is set forth below.

In arriving at ournon-GAAP presentation, we have in the past factored out items, and would expect in the future to continue to factor out items, that either have anon-recurring impact on the income statement or which, in the judgment of our management, are items that, either as a result of their nature or size, could, were they not singled out, potentially cause investors to extrapolate future performance from an improper base. While not all inclusive, examples of these items include: legal settlements and reserves, purchase accounting expense adjustments related to acquisitions, including adjustments for write-offs of IPR&D, amortization of intangible assets and inventory“step-ups” following acquisitions; changes in the fair value of contingent consideration related to business combination; restructuring expenses related to efforts to rationalize and integrate operations on a global basis; material tax and other

awards or settlements—both in terms of amounts paid or amounts received; impairments related to intangible and other assets such as intellectual property, product rights or goodwill; the income tax effects of the foregoing types of items when they occur; and costs related to regulatory actions taken at our facilities (such as uncapitalized production costs, consulting expenses or write-offs of inventory related to remediation). Included in restructuring expenses are severance, shut down costs, contract termination costs and other costs that we believe are sufficiently large that their exclusion is important to understanding trends in our financial results.

These data arenon-GAAP financial measures and should not be considered replacements for GAAP results. We provide suchnon-GAAP data because management believes that such data provide useful information to investors. However, investors are cautioned that, unlike financial measures prepared in accordance with GAAP,non-GAAP measures may not be comparable with the calculation of similar measures for other companies. Thesenon-GAAP financial measures are presented solely to permit investors to more fully understand how management assesses our performance. The limitations of using thesenon-GAAP financial measures as performance measures are that they provide a view of our results of operations without including all events during a period, such as the effects of acquisition, merger-related, restructuring and other charges, and may not provide a comparable view of our performance to other companies in the pharmaceutical industry.

Investors should considernon-GAAP financial measures in addition to, and not as replacements for, or superior to, measures of financial performance prepared in accordance with GAAP.

Contents

The following table presents the GAAP measures, related
non-GAAP
adjustments and the corresponding
non-GAAP
amounts for the applicable periods:

     Three Months Ended March 31, 2018  Three Months Ended March 31, 2017 
     U.S. dollars and shares in millions (except per share amounts) 
     GAAP  Non-GAAP
Adjustments
  Dividends
on
Preferred
Shares
  Non-GAAP  % of Net
Revenues
  GAAP  Non-GAAP
Adjustments
  Dividends
on
Preferred
Shares
  Non-GAAP  % of Net
Revenues
 
  Gross profit (1)  2,348   303    2,651   52  2,839   377    3,216   57
  Operating income (loss) (1)(2)  1,525   (90   1,435   28  895   726    1,621   29
  Net income attributable to ordinary shareholders (1)(2)(3)(4)  1,055   (101   954   19  580   499    1,079   19
  Earnings per share attributable to ordinary shareholders - diluted  1.03   (0.09   0.94    0.57   0.49    1.06  

(1)

  Amortization of purchased intangible assets   264       267    
  Inventorystep-up   —         64    
  Costs related to regulatory actions taken in facilities   1       34    
  Equity compensation expenses  ��6       5    
  Other COGS related adjustments   32       7    
    

 

 

      

 

 

    
  Gross profit adjustments   303       377    

(2)

  

Gain on divestitures, net of divestitures related costs

   (93      —      
  Goodwill impairment   180       —      
  Restructuring expenses   247       130    
  Amortization of purchased intangible assets   46       53    
  Capital loss on currency translation   —         52    
  Equity compensation expenses   24       31    
  Acquisition, Integration and related expenses   2       23    
  Other R&D expenses   22       —      
  Contingent consideration   8       21    
  Legal settlements and loss contingencies   (1,278      20    
  Impairment of long-lived assets   432       11    
  Other operating related adjustments   17       8    
    

 

 

      

 

 

    
     (393      349    
    

 

 

      

 

 

    
  Operating income adjustments   (90      726    
    

 

 

      

 

 

    

(3)

  Financial expense (income)   68       (28   
  Tax effect   (165      (186   
  Impairment of equity investment   94       —      
  Minority interest   (8      (13   
    

 

 

      

 

 

    
  Net income adjustments   (101      499    
    

 

 

      

 

 

    

(4)Thenon-GAAP diluted weighted average number of shares was 1,020 and 1,017 million for the three months ended March 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively. For the three months ended March 31, 2018, the mandatory convertible preferred shares amounting to 64 million weighted average shares had an anti-dilutive effect on earnings per share and were therefore excluded from the outstanding shares calculation.Non-GAAP earnings per share can be reconciled with GAAP earnings per share by dividing each of the amounts included in footnotes1-3 above by the applicable weighted average share number.

  
Three Months Ended March 31, 2022
 
  
U.S. $ and shares in millions (except per share amounts)
 
  GAAP  Excluded for
non-GAAP
measurement
  Non-GAAP 
     Amortization
of purchased
intangible
assets
  Legal
settlements
and loss
contingencies
  
Impairment
of long
lived
assets
  Restructuring
costs
  Costs
related to
regulatory
actions
taken in
facilities
  Equity
compensation
  Contingent
consideration
  Other
non-GAAP

items*
  Other
items
    
Net revenues
  3,661            3,661 
Cost of sales
  1,921   178      1   5    62    1,675 
 
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
 
Gross profit
  1,740   178      1   5    62    1,986 
Gross profit margin
  47.5           54.2
R&D expenses
  225        4      221 
S&M expenses
  584   22       7    3    552 
G&A expenses
  296        8    36    252 
Other income
  (52         —      (52
Legal settlements and loss contingencies
  1,124    1,124          —   
Other assets impairments, restructuring and other items
  128     16   57     33   21    —   
Intangible assets impairments
  149     149         —   
 
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
 
Operating income (loss)
  (713  200   1,124   165   57   1   24   33   123    1,013 
Financial expenses, net
  258           11   247 
 
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
 
Income (loss) before income taxes
  (971  200   1,124   165   57   1   24   33   123   11   766 
Income taxes
  2           (140  142 
Share in (profits) losses of associated companies, net
  (21          (22  1 
 
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
 
Net income (loss)
  (952  200   1,124   165   57   1   24   33   123   (152  623 
Net income (loss) attributable to
non-controlling
interests
  3           (11  14 
 
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
 
Net income (loss) attributable to Teva
  (955  200   1,124   165   57   1   24   33   123   (163  609 
 
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
 
EPS - Basic
  (0.86          1.41   0.55 
EPS - Diluted
  (0.86          1.41   0.55 
The
non-GAAP
diluted weighted average number of shares was 1,112 million for the three months ended March 31, 2022.
Non-GAAP Tax Rate

Non-GAAP

income taxes for the first quarterthree months ended March 31, 2022 were 18.5% on
pre-tax
non-GAAP
income.
*
Other
non-GAAP
items include other exceptional items that we believe are sufficiently large that their exclusion is important to facilitate an understanding of trends in our financial results, such as certain accelerated depreciation expenses and inventory write offs, primarily related to the rationalization of our plants and other unusual events.
62

Table of 2018Contents
  
Three Months Ended March 31, 2021
 
  
U.S. $ and shares in millions (except per share amounts)
 
  GAAP  Excluded for
non-GAAP
measurement
  Non-GAAP 
     Amortization
of purchased
intangible
assets
  Legal
settlements
and loss
contingencies
  
Impairment
of long
lived
assets
  Other
R&D
expenses
  Restructuring
costs
  Costs
related to
regulatory
actions
taken in
facilities
  Equity
compensation
  Contingent
consideration
  Other
non-GAAP

items*
  Other
items
    
Net revenues
  3,982             3,982 
Cost of sales
  2,104   215       5   6    41    1,838 
 
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
 
Gross profit
  1,878   215       5   6    41    2,144 
Gross profit margin
  47.2            53.8
R&D expenses
  254      5     5      244 
S&M expenses
  585   27        9      549 
G&A expenses
  290         11    —      278 
Other income
  (5          —      (5
Legal settlements and loss contingencies
  104    104           —   
Other assets impairments, restructuring and other items
  137     48    81     3   4    —   
Intangible assets impairments
  79     79          —   
 
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
 
Operating income (loss)
  434   242   104   127   5   81   5   31   3   45    1,077 
Financial expenses, net
  290            64   227 
 
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
 
Income (loss) before income taxes
  144   242   104   127   5   81   5   31   3   45   64   851 
Income taxes
  62            (85  146 
Share in (profit) losses of associated
companies – net
  (3           2   (4
 
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
 
Net income (loss)
  84   242   104   127   5   81   5   31   3   45   (19  709 
Net income (loss) attributable to
non-controlling
interests
  7            (3  10 
 
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
 
Net income (loss) attributable to Teva
  77   242   104   127   5   81   5   31   3   45   (22  699 
 
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
 
EPS - Basic
  0.07            0.57   0.64 
EPS - Diluted
  0.07            0.56   0.63 
The
non-GAAP
diluted weighted average number of shares was 1,107 million for the three months ended March 31, 2021.
Non-GAAP
income taxes for the three months ended March 31, 2021 were $211 million, or 17%, onpre-taxnon-GAAP income
pre-tax
non-GAAP
income.
*
Other
non-GAAP
items include other exceptional items that we believe are sufficiently large that their exclusion is important to facilitate an understanding of trends in our financial results, such as certain accelerated depreciation expenses and inventory write offs, primarily related to the rationalization of our plants and other unusual events.
63

Table of $1.2 billion.Contents
Non-GAAP
Tax Rate
Non-GAAP
income taxes in the first quarter of 20172022 were $240$142 million, or 18.5%, on
pre-tax
non-GAAP
income of $766 million.
Non-GAAP
income taxes in the first quarter of 2021 were $146 million, or 17%, onpre-taxnon-GAAP
pre-tax
non-GAAP
income of $1.4 billion.

$851 million. Our

non-GAAP
tax rate in the first quarter of 2022 was mainly affected by the mix of products we sold and interest expense disallowances.
We expect our annual
non-GAAP
tax rate for 20182022 to be 17%. Ourbetween 18% to 19%, higher than our
non-GAAP
tax rate for 20172021, which was 15%. The expected 2018 non-GAAP tax rate is higher than our 2017non-GAAP tax rate, as we expect less tax benefits associated with the Actavis Generics acquisition16.4%, mainly as a result of the enactmentdifferent mix of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act in the United States.

products we expect to sell this year.

Off-Balance
Sheet Arrangements

Except for securitization transactions, which are disclosed in note 16d10(f) to our consolidated financial statements included in our annual reportAnnual Report on Form
10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2017,2021, we do not have any material
off-balance
sheet arrangements.

Critical Accounting Policies

The preparation

For a summary of our consolidated financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions in certain circumstances that affect the amounts reported in the accompanying consolidated financial statements and related footnotes. Actual results may differ from these estimates. We base our judgments on our experience and on various assumptions that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances.

As applicablesignificant accounting policies, see note 1 to our consolidated financial statements the most significant estimates and assumptions relate to purchase price allocation on acquisitions, including determination of useful lives and contingent consideration; determining the valuation and recoverability of intangible assets and goodwill; and assessing sales reserves and allowances, uncertain tax positions, valuation allowances, contingencies, restructuring costs and inventory valuation.

Please refer to note 1 in the consolidated financial statements and critical accounting policies“Critical Accounting Policies” included in our Annual Report on Form

10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2017 for a summary of our significant accounting policies.

2021.

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

See note 21 to our consolidated financial statements.

ITEM 3.
QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

There has not been any material change in our assessment of material contractual obligations and commitmentsmarket risk as set forth in Item 7A to our Annual Report on Form
10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2017, other than as set forth below. These changes are the result of the significant debt movements during the first quarter of 2018, as described under Item 2 “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Liquidity and Capital Resources—2018 Debt Balance and Movements” above.

Our outstanding debt obligations, the corresponding interest rates, currency and repayment schedules as of March 31, 2018 are set forth in the table below in U.S. dollar equivalent terms, taking into account recent changes in our debt movement:

Currency

  Total
Amount
  Interest
Rate Ranges
  2018   2019   2020   2021   2022   2023 &
thereafter
 
   (U.S. dollars in millions) 

Fixed Rate:

               

USD

   18,433   1.70  6.75  —      2,000    700    3,620    863    11,250 

Euro

   9,914   0.38  3.85  —      —      2,152    587    863    6,312 

CHF

   1,521   0.13  1.50  786          367    368 

USD convertible debentures*

   514   0.25  0.25  514    —      —      —      —      —   

Floating Rate:

               

USD

   500   2.80  2.80  —      —      —      —      —      500 

JPY

   —       —      —      —      —      —      —   

Others

   7   8.00  13.00  2    —      —      —      —      5 
  

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total:

   30,889    $1,302   $2,000   $2,852   $4,207   $2,093   $18,435 
  

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Less debt issuance costs

   (137             
  

 

 

              

Total:

  $30,752              
  

 

 

              

2021.
ITEM 4.
CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Teva maintains “disclosure controls and procedures. Our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, after evaluating the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and proceduresprocedures” (as defined in Rule
Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e) under
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) that are designed to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed in Teva’s reports filed or submitted under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934)1934, as of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report, has concluded that, as of such date, Teva’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective to ensure that the information required in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Actamended, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to ourTeva’s management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

In designing and evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures, management recognizes that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objective.

After evaluating the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of March 31, 2022, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that, as of such date, Teva’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective at the reasonable assurance level.
Changes in Internal control. Control over Financial Reporting
During the period covered by this Quarterly Report,quarter ended March 31, 2022, there were no changes in Teva’s internal control over financial reporting that have materially affected or are reasonably likely to materially affect Teva’s internal control over financial reporting.

64

PART II — OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1.
LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

We are subject to various litigation and other legal proceedings. For a discussion of these matters, see “Commitments and Contingencies” included in note 1610 to the consolidated financial statements included in Part I, Item 1 of this Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q.

ITEM 1A.
RISK FACTORS

There are no material changes to the risk factors previously disclosed in our Annual Report on Form
10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2017.

2021.
ITEM 2.
UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS

Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities

There were no sales of unregistered equity securities during the three months ended March 31, 2018.

2022.

Repurchase of Shares

In December 2011, our Board of Directors authorized us to repurchase up to an aggregate amount of $3.0 billion of our ordinary shares or ADSs, of which $1.3 billion remained available for purchase, when in October 2014, the Board of Directors authorized us to increase our share repurchase program by $1.7 billion to $3.0 billion, of which $2.1 billion remained available as of March 31, 2018.

We did not repurchase any of our shares during the three months ended March 31, 20182022 and currently cannot do soconduct share repurchases or pay dividends due to our accumulated deficit. The repurchase program has no time limit. Repurchases may be commenced or suspended at any time, subject to applicable law.

ITEM 3.
DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES

Not applicable.

ITEM 4.
MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES

Not applicable.

ITEM 5.
OTHER INFORMATION

Not applicable.

Revolving Credit Agreement
On April 29, 2022, Teva and certain of its subsidiaries entered into a $1.8 billion senior unsecured sustainability-linked revolving credit agreement (the “Revolving Credit Agreement”) with a syndicate of banks, arranged by Bank of America Europe Designated Activity Company, as Documentation Agent and Sustainability Coordinator, Bank of America Europe DAC, BNP Parisbas, Citibank, N.A., Goldman Sachs Bank USA, HSBC Bank Plc, Inesa San Paolo S.P.A, J.P. Morgan S.E., Mizuho Bank, LTD. and PNC Bank, National Association, as Bookrunners & Mandated Lead Arrangers, and Bank of America, N.A., as Administrative Agent and Bank of America Europe Designated Activity Company, as Sustainability Coordinator.
The Revolving Credit Agreement provides for a $1.8 billion Tranche A-1 commitment, and loans and letters of credit will be available from time to time for Teva’s general corporate purposes. Tranche A-1 has a maturity date of April 29, 2026, with two one-year extension options, and will bear interest at Term SOFR (which is subject to certain SOFR Adjustments, as such term is defined in the Revolving Credit Agreement) plus a margin ranging from 0.650% to 1.650% based on Teva’s credit rating from time to time. The applicable margin may be increased or decreased (or neither increased or decreased) based on a progress of two sustainability performance metrics outlined in the Revolving Credit Agreement, (i) the company’s S&P Environmental, Social and Governance Score and (ii) number of new regulatory submissions in low and middle-income countries. The applicable margin will never be reduced or increased based on sustainability performance metrics by more than 0.05% during any calendar year. The commitment will also be subject to a commitment fee on undrawn amounts ranging from 0.228% to 0.578%, based on Teva’s credit rating from time to time. All outstanding loans and letters of credit will be subject to a utilization fee, ranging from 0.100% to 0.300%, based on the then aggregate loans and letters of credit then currently outstanding. Funding of the loans under the Revolving Credit Agreement is subject to customary drawdown conditions.
The Revolving Credit Agreement contains certain customary affirmative and negative covenants for facilities of this type, including certain reporting obligations and certain limitations on dispositions; mergers or consolidations; restricted payments; and limitations on liens, encumbrances and certain indebtedness. The Revolving Credit Agreement contains two financial maintenance covenants, (i) a maximum leverage ratio stepping down from 4.50x to 3.50x over the life of the facility and (ii) a minimum interest coverage ratio of 3.50x. The Revolving Credit Agreement also contains customary events of default, including non-compliance with one or more of the covenants.
The representations, warranties and covenants contained in the Revolving Credit Agreement were made only for purposes of such agreement and as of the dates specified therein, were solely for the benefit of the parties thereto and may be subject to qualifications agreed by the contracting parties and standards of materiality applicable to the contracting parties that differ from those applicable to investors. Investors should not rely on the representations, warranties and covenants or any descriptions thereof as characterizations of the actual state of facts or condition of the Company and its subsidiaries.
Concurrently with entry into the Revolving Credit Agreement, Teva’s existing $2.3 billion senior unsecured revolving credit agreement with a syndicate of banks, arranged by Bank of America Merrill Lynch International Designated Activity Company and HSBC Bank plc, as Coordinating LLC, Goldman Sachs Bank USA, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., Mizuho Bank, Ltd., Morgan Stanley Senior Funding, Inc., MUFG Bank, Ltd., Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corporation and PNC Bank National Association, as Bookrunners & Mandated Lead Arrangers, Banca IMI, as Lead Arranger, and Bank of America, N.A., as Administrative Agent, was terminated. See note 9 to our consolidated financial statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2021, for a summary of the terms of the existing revolving credit agreement.
The foregoing description of the Revolving Credit Agreement does not purport to be complete and is qualified in its entirety by reference to the Revolving Credit Agreement, which is filed as Exhibit 10.1 hereto and is incorporated herein by reference.
65

Table of Contents
ITEM 6.
EXHIBITS

    4.110.1  Senior Indenture,Unsecured Sustainability-Linked Revolving Credit Agreement, dated as of March  14, 2018,April 29, 2022, by and among Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Limited, Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., Teva Pharmaceutical Finance Netherlands II B.V. and Teva Pharmaceutical Finance Netherlands III B.V., Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Limited and Theas borrowers, Bank of New York Mellon,America, N.A., as trustee(1)administrative agent, Bank of America Europe Designated Activity Company, as sustainability coordinator and documentation agent, and the lenders party thereto *
    4.2First Supplemental Senior Indenture, dated as of March  14, 2018, among Teva Pharmaceutical Finance Netherlands III B.V., Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Limited and The Bank of New York Mellon, as trustee, including the form of 6.000% Senior Notes due 2024 and the form of 6.750% Senior Notes due 2028 (2)
    4.3Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of March  14, 2018, among Teva Pharmaceutical Finance Netherlands III B.V., Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Limited and the initial purchasers party thereto(3)
    4.4Senior Indenture, dated as of March  14, 2018, among Teva Pharmaceutical Finance Netherlands II B.V., Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Limited and The Bank of New York Mellon, as trustee (4)
    4.5First Supplemental Senior Indenture, dated as of March  14, 2018, among Teva Pharmaceutical Finance Netherlands II B.V., Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Limited, The Bank of New York Mellon, as trustee, and The Bank of New York Mellon, London Branch, as paying agent, including the form of 3.250% Senior Notes due 2022 and the form of 4.500% Senior Notes due 2025(5)
    4.6Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of March  14, 2018, among Teva Pharmaceutical Finance Netherlands II B.V., Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Limited and the initial purchasers party thereto(6)
31.1  Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 *
31.2  Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 *
32  Certification of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 *
101.INS  XBRL Taxonomy Instance Document
101.SCH  XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
101.CAL  XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
101.DEF  XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document
101.LAB  XBRL Taxonomy LabelExtension Labels Linkbase Document
101.PRE  XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document
104Cover Page Interactive Data File (formatted as Inline XBRL and contained in Exhibit 101)

*
Filed herewith.
(1)Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Form8-K filed on March 14, 2018.
(2)Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to Form8-K filed on March 14, 2018.
(3)Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.4 to Form8-K filed on March 14, 2018.
(4)Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.5 to Form8-K filed on March 14, 2018.
(5)Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.6 to Form8-K filed on March 14, 2018.
(6)Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.8 to Form8-K filed on March 14, 2018.

66

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

  TEVA PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES LIMITED
Date: May 3, 20182022  By: 

/s/ Michael McClellan

Eli Kalif
  Name: Michael McClellan
Eli Kalif
  Title: 

Executive Vice President,

Chief Financial Officer

(Duly Authorized Officer)

78

67