UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM10-Q

(X) QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)

OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2018March 31, 2019

OR ( ) TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)

OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from              to              

Commission File Number000-52602

CERES TACTICAL COMMODITY L.P.

 

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

 

New York 20-2718952

(State or other jurisdiction of

(I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization)

 

(I.R.S. Employer

Identification No.)

c/o Ceres Managed Futures LLC

522 Fifth Avenue

New York, New York 10036

 

(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)

(855)672-4468

 

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:None

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

YesX     No  

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of RegulationS-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).

YesX     No  

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, anon-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company” and “emerging growth company” in Rule12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

 

Large accelerated filer _

  

Accelerated filer _

  Non-accelerated filerX

Smaller reporting company _

  

Emerging growth company

_

  

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act.Act. __

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

Yes      NoX

As of July 31, 2018, 48,352.9367April 30, 2019, 79,563.4117 Limited Partnership Class A Redeemable Units were outstanding, 500.0000600.0580 Limited Partnership Class D Redeemable Units were outstanding and 0.000099.2020 Limited Partnership Class Z Redeemable Units were outstanding.


PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1.Financial Statements.

Ceres Tactical Commodity L.P.

Statements of Financial Condition

 

                                          
  March 31, December 31,
  2019 2018
  June 30,
2018
     (Unaudited)     
       December 31,   
2017
  (Unaudited) 

 

Assets:

       

Investment in the Fund(s)(1), at fair value

    $23,692,276     $69,682,811 

Redemptions receivable from the Funds

   490,073    7,919,027 

Investment in the Fund(1), at fair value

    $-        $5,489,732 

Redemptions receivable from the Fund

   3,792,429   21,653 
  

 

  

 

  

 

 

 

Equity in trading account:

       

Unrestricted cash

   38,141,858    220,802    100,243,252   46,452,179 

Restricted cash

   4,452,352    -        6,043,987   7,608,136 

Options purchased, at fair value (premiums paid $940,987 and $0 at June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, respectively)

   832,608    -     

Net unrealized appreciation on open futures contracts

   522,162   1,757,511 

Net unrealized appreciation on open forward contracts

   198,263   -     

Options purchased, at fair value (premiums paid $1,449,670 and $555,793 at March 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, respectively)

   1,148,815   305,214 
  

 

  

 

  

 

 

 

Total equity in trading account

   43,426,818    220,802    108,156,479   56,123,040 
  

 

  

 

  

 

 

 

Cash at bank

   -        436 

Interest receivable

   55,474    -        210,815   94,727 
  

 

  

 

  

 

 

 

Total assets

    $67,664,641     $77,823,076     $        112,159,723    $        61,729,152 
  

 

  

 

  

 

 

 

Liabilities and Partners’ Capital:

       

Liabilities:

       

Net unrealized depreciation on open futures contracts

    $193,112     $-     

Net unrealized depreciation on open forward contracts

   51,899    -         $-        $364,117 

Options written, at fair value (premiums received $1,408,106 and $0 at June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, respectively)

   1,372,303    -     

Options written, at fair value (premiums received $1,115,308 and $506,194 at March 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, respectively)

   1,168,287   409,571 

Accrued expenses:

       

Ongoing selling agent fees

   108,825    127,998    181,658   99,660 

Management fees

   84,706    80,706    162,680   82,317 

General Partner fees

   54,773    64,565    69,133   50,530 

Incentive Fees

   354,687    -        389,896   957,011 

Professional fees

   210,814    216,978    196,534   220,343 

Redemptions payable to General Partner

   -        250,000 

Redemptions payable to Limited Partners

   1,185,606    7,367,055    540,520   1,326,737 
  

 

  

 

  

 

 

 

Total liabilities

    $3,616,725     $8,107,302    2,708,708   3,510,286 
  

 

  

 

  

 

 

 

Partners’ Capital:

       

General Partner, Class Z, 745.0230 and 795.9520 Redeemable Units outstanding at June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, respectively

   744,456    769,492 

Limited Partners, Class A, 48,881.9407 and 54,475.3577 Redeemable Units outstanding at June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, respectively

   63,303,460    68,946,282 

General Partner, Class Z, 1,416.4870 and 745.0230 Redeemable Units outstanding at March 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, respectively

   1,486,204   755,325 

Limited Partners, Class A, 80,067.2267 and 43,713.9067 Redeemable Units outstanding at March 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, respectively

   107,234,232   56,857,034 

Limited Partners, Class D, 600.0580 Redeemable Units outstanding at March 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018

   626,494   606,507 

Limited Partners, Class Z, 99.2020 and 0.0000 Redeemable Units outstanding at March 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, respectively

   104,085   -     
  

 

  

 

  

 

 

 

Total partners’ capital (net asset value)

   64,047,916    69,715,774    109,451,015   58,218,866 
  

 

  

 

  

 

 

 

Total liabilities and partners’ capital

    $67,664,641     $77,823,076     $112,159,723      $61,729,152   
  

 

  

 

  

 

 

 

Net asset value per Redeemable Unit:

       

Class A

    $1,295.03     $1,265.64     $1,339.30    $1,300.66 
  

 

  

 

  

 

 

 

Class D

    $1,044.06    $1,010.75 
  

 

 

 

Class Z

    $999.24     $966.76     $1,049.22    $1,013.83 
  

 

  

 

  

 

 

 

 

(1)

Defined in Note 1.

See accompanying notes to financial statements.

 

1


Ceres Tactical Commodity L.P.

Condensed Schedule of Investments

June 30, 2018March 31, 2019

(Unaudited)

 

                                                               
          Number of                % of Partners’     
  Notional ($)/
Number of
          Contracts           
             Fair Value                   % of Partners’        
Capital
   Contracts  Fair Value Capital 

Futures Contracts Purchased

          

Currencies

   28      $(42,984 (0.07)   % 

Energy

   865    2,435,188  3.80      14,441     $2,552,169   2.33   % 

Grains

   619     (1,015,783 (1.59)     741    (311,176  (0.28)  

Livestock

   48     56,200  0.09      95    338,510   0.31   

Metals

   111     (152,926 (0.24)     91    (33,909  (0.03)  

Softs

   174     (58,540 (0.08)     984    45,570   0.04   
    

 

 

 

     

 

 

 

 

Total futures contracts purchased

     1,221,155  1.91        2,591,164   2.37   
    

 

 

 

 
    

 

 

 

 

Futures Contracts Sold

          

Energy

   730     (2,062,904 (3.22)     10,352    (2,246,112  (2.05)  

Grains

   633     307,237  0.48      925    502,258   0.46   

Livestock

   46     (25,500 (0.04)     130    (52,227  (0.05)  

Metals

   39     37,503  0.06      134    3,942   0.00   * 

Softs

   196     329,397  0.51      807    (276,863  (0.25)  
    

 

 

 

     

 

 

 

 

Total futures contracts sold

     (1,414,267 (2.21)       (2,069,002  (1.89)  
    

 

 

 

     

 

 

 

 

Net unrealized depreciation on open futures contracts

      $(193,112 (0.30)   % 

Net unrealized appreciation on open futures contracts

      $522,162   0.48   % 
    

 

 

 

     

 

 

 

 

Unrealized Appreciation on Open Forward Contracts

          

Metals

   607      $2,819,788  4.40    %    590     $1,430,879   1.31  
    

 

 

 

     

 

 

 

 

Total unrealized appreciation on open forward contracts

     2,819,788  4.40        1,430,879   1.31   
    

 

 

 

     

 

 

 

 

Unrealized Depreciation on Open Forward Contracts

          

Metals

   633     (2,871,687 (4.48)     507    (1,232,616  (1.13)  
    

 

 

 

     

 

 

 

 

Total unrealized depreciation on open forward contracts

     (2,871,687 (4.48)       (1,232,616  (1.13)  
    

 

 

 

     

 

 

 

 

Net unrealized depreciation on open forward contracts

      $(51,899 (0.08)   % 

Net unrealized appreciation on open forward contracts

      $198,263   0.18   % 
    

 

 

 

     

 

 

 

 

Options Purchased

          

Calls

          

Energy

        $150  0.00    %*    390     $25,362   0.02   % 

Grains

   123     48,288  0.08      204    5,100   0.00   * 

Metals

   205     371,487  0.58      215    825,700   0.75   

Softs

       12,775  0.02      135    117,341   0.11   

Puts

     

Energy

   24    9,252   0.01   

Livestock

   683    117,840   0.11   

Metals

   58    41,500   0.04   

Softs

   25    6,720   0.01   
    

 

 

 

     

 

 

 

 

Total call options purchased (premiums paid $607,913)

     432,700  0.68   
    

 

 

 

 

Puts

     

Metals

   146     399,908  0.62   
    

 

 

 

 

Total put options purchased (premiums paid $333,074)

     399,908  0.62   
    

 

 

 

 

Total options purchased (premiums paid $940,987)

      $832,608  1.30    % 

Total options purchased (premiums paid $1,449,670)

      $1,148,815   1.05   % 
    

 

 

 

     

 

 

 

 

Options Written

          

Calls

          

Grains

   29      $(5,438 (0.01)   % 

Livestock

   62     $(27,490  (0.03)  % 

Metals

   178     (526,732 (0.82)     219    (844,147  (0.78)  
    

 

 

 

 

Total call options written (premiums received $727,347)

     (532,170 (0.83)  
    

 

 

 

 

Puts

          

Energy

   14     (23,686 (0.04)     97    (11,737  (0.01)  

Grains

   225     (298,125 (0.47)     50    (47,813  (0.04)  

Metals

   183     (518,322 (0.80)     70    (199,660  (0.18)  

Softs

   24    (37,440  (0.03)  
    

 

 

 

     

 

 

 

 

Total put options written (premiums received $680,759)

     (840,133 (1.31)  

Total options written (premiums received $1,115,308)

      $        (1,168,287  (1.07)  % 
    

 

 

 

     

 

 

 

 

Total options written (premiums received $1,408,106)

      $(1,372,303 (2.14)   % 
    

 

 

 

 
Investment in the Funds      Fair Value % of Partners’
Capital
 

MB Master Fund L.P.

      $8,270,055  12.91    % 

CMF Harbour Square Master Fund LLC

     15,422,221  24.08   
    

 

 

 

 

Total investment in the Funds

      $23,692,276  36.99    % 
    

 

 

 

 

*

*    Due to rounding.

See accompanying notes to financial statements.

 

2


Ceres Tactical Commodity L.P.

Condensed Schedule of InvestmentInvestments

December 31, 20172018

 

Investment in the Fund

            Fair Value                    % of Partners’        
Capital
 

MB Master Fund L.P.

    $69,682,811    99.95    % 
  

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total investment in the Fund

    $69,682,811    99.95    % 
  

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

                                                               
           Number of                % of Partners’     
   Contracts            Fair Value            Capital 

Futures Contracts Purchased

     

Currencies

   35     $13,419   0.02   % 

Energy

   1,827    (3,537,375  (6.08)  

Grains

   269    (34,732  (0.06)  

Livestock

   424    (133,210  (0.22)  

Metals

   132    (17,816  (0.03)  

Softs

   284    (15,437  (0.03)  
    

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total futures contracts purchased

     (3,725,151  (6.40)  
    

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Futures Contracts Sold

     

Energy

   2,168    5,226,770   8.98   

Grains

   306    125,329   0.22   

Livestock

   501    197,475   0.34   

Metals

   127    (151,374  (0.26)  

Softs

   367    84,462   0.14   
    

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total futures contracts sold

     5,482,662   9.42   
    

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net unrealized appreciation on open futures contracts

      $1,757,511   3.02   % 
    

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Unrealized Appreciation on Open Forward Contracts

     

Metals

   677     $2,203,511   3.78   % 
    

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total unrealized appreciation on open forward contracts

     2,203,511   3.78   
    

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Unrealized Depreciation on Open Forward Contracts

     

Metals

   774    (2,567,628  (4.41)  
    

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total unrealized depreciation on open forward contracts

     (2,567,628  (4.41)  
    

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net unrealized depreciation on open forward contracts

      $(364,117  (0.63)  % 
    

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Options Purchased

     

Calls

     

Grains

   110     $27,500   0.05   % 

Metals

   244    37,084   0.06   

Puts

     

Energy

   36    35,640   0.06   

Livestock

   62    19,620   0.03   

Metals

   94    185,370   0.32   
    

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total options purchased (premiums paid $555,793)

      $305,214   0.52   % 
    

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Options Written

     

Calls

     

Energy

   44     $(34,760  (0.06)  % 

Livestock

   18    (17,820  (0.03)  

Metals

   141    (13,833  (0.02)  

Softs

   27    (44,820  (0.08)  

Puts

     

Metals

   117    (225,236  (0.39)  

Softs

   104    (73,102  (0.12)  
    

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total options written (premiums received $506,194)

      $(409,571  (0.70)  % 
    

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
        % of Partners’ 

Investment in the Fund

     Fair Value   Capital 

CMF Harbour Square Master Fund LLC

      $5,489,732   9.43  % 
    

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total investment in the Fund

      $5,489,732   9.43  % 
    

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

See accompanying notes to financial statements.

 

3


Ceres Tactical Commodity L.P.

Statements of Income and Expenses

(Unaudited)

 

                                          
  Three Months Ended
  Three Months Ended
June 30,
 Six Months Ended
June 30,
  March 31,
  2018 2017 2018 2017  2019 2018

Investment Income:

        

Interest income

    $160,343    $-        $294,601    $-         $563,889    $134,258 

Interest income allocated from the Fund(s)

   102,901  173,995  197,874  306,978    26,412   94,973 
  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total investment income

   263,244  173,995  492,475  306,978    590,301   229,231 
  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

Expenses:

        

Expenses allocated from the Funds

   95,188  388,618  172,731  713,764 

Expenses allocated from the Fund(s)

   37,222   77,543 

Clearing fees related to direct investments

   141,217   -      275,664   -        335,728   134,447 

Ongoing selling agent fees

   333,832  482,194  674,383  1,016,293    543,210   340,551 

Management fees

   258,712  303,880  518,982  640,450    404,775   260,270 

General Partner fees

   168,010  243,105  339,474  512,361    206,598   171,464 

Incentive fees

   341,419   -      415,320   -        371,860   73,901 

Professional fees

   87,538  93,238  178,194  190,147    114,960   90,656 
  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total expenses

   1,425,916  1,511,035  2,574,748  3,073,015    2,014,353   1,148,832 
  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net investment loss

   (1,162,672 (1,337,040 (2,082,273 (2,766,037   (1,424,052  (919,601
  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

Trading Results:

        

Net gains (losses) on trading of commodity interests and investment in the Funds:

     

Net gains (losses) on trading of commodity interests and investment in the Fund(s):

   

Net realized gains (losses) on closed contracts

   2,882,877   -      3,458,066   -        5,392,699   575,189 

Net realized gains (losses) on closed contracts allocated from the Funds

   144,570  (159,868 865,514  (950,764

Net realized gains (losses) on closed contracts allocated from the Fund(s)

   112,982   720,944 

Net change in unrealized gains (losses) on open contracts

   (359,919  -      (327,453  -        (874,702  32,466 

Net change in unrealized gains (losses) on open contracts allocated from the Funds

   (642,747 (818,452 (338,694 (1,060,095

Net change in unrealized gains (losses) on open contracts allocated from the Fund(s)

   2,570   304,053 
  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total trading results

   2,024,781  (978,320 3,657,433  (2,010,859             4,633,549             1,632,652 
  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net income (loss)

    $862,109    $(2,315,360   $1,575,160    $(4,776,896    $3,209,497    $713,051 
  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net income (loss) per Redeemable Unit:*

        

Class A

    $16.22    $(32.86   $29.39    $(63.04    $38.64    $13.17 
  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

Class D

    $33.31    $-     
  

 

 

 

Class Z

    $17.49    $(19.90   $32.48    $(37.58    $35.39    $14.99 
  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

Weighted average Redeemable Units outstanding:

        

Class A

   50,732.9224  73,967.7534  51,862.9645  77,388.6140    81,675.3130   52,993.0067 
  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

Class D

   600.0580   -     
  

 

 

 

Class Z

   745.0230  1,223.2407  770.4875  1,265.4138    1,482.6217   795.9520 
  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

*

*    Represents the change in net asset value per Redeemable Unit during the period.

See accompanying notes to financial statements.

 

4


Ceres Tactical Commodity L.P.

Statements of Changes in Partners’ Capital

For the SixThree Months Ended June 30,March 31, 2019 and 2018 and 2017

(Unaudited)

 

                                                                                                                                                                        
  Class A Class Z Total  Class A Class D  Class Z Total
      Amount     Redeemable Units     Amount     Redeemable Units     Amount     Redeemable Units  Amount Redeemable Units Amount  Redeemable Units  Amount Redeemable Units Amount Redeemable Units
  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Partners’ Capital, December 31, 2018

    $56,857,034   43,713.9067    $606,507    600.0580     $755,325   745.0230    $58,218,866   45,058.9877 

Subscriptions - General Partner

   -       -       -        -        680,750   671.4640   680,750   671.4640 

Subscriptions - Limited Partners

   51,042,913   39,246.7420   -        -        100,000   99.2020   51,142,913   39,345.9440 

Redemptions - Limited Partners

   (3,801,011  (2,893.4220  -        -        -       -       (3,801,011  (2,893.4220

Net income (loss)

   3,135,296   -       19,987    -        54,214   -       3,209,497   -     
  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Partners’ Capital, March 31, 2019

    $107,234,232   80,067.2267    $626,494    600.0580     $1,590,289   1,515.6890    $109,451,015   82,182.9737 
  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Partners’ Capital, December 31, 2017

    $68,946,282  54,475.3577    $769,492  795.9520    $69,715,774  55,271.3097     $68,946,282   54,475.3577    $-        -         $769,492   795.9520    $69,715,774   55,271.3097 

Subscriptions - Limited Partners

   1,565,000  1,218.5560   -       -      1,565,000  1,218.5560 

Redemptions - General Partner

   -       -      (50,000 (50.9290 (50,000 (50.9290   -       -       -        -        (50,000  (50.9290  (50,000  (50.9290

Redemptions - Limited Partners

   (8,758,018 (6,811.9730  -       -      (8,758,018 (6,811.9730   (4,400,107  (3,453.3910  -        -        -       -       (4,400,107  (3,453.3910

Net income (loss)

   1,550,196   -      24,964   -      1,575,160   -        701,120   -       -        -        11,931   -       713,051   -     
  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Partners’ Capital, June 30, 2018

    $63,303,460  48,881.9407    $744,456  745.0230    $64,047,916  49,626.9637 

Partners’ Capital, March 31, 2018

    $65,247,295   51,021.9667    $-        -         $731,423   745.0230    $65,978,718   51,766.9897 
  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Partners’ Capital, December 31, 2016

    $103,433,044  77,437.5062    $-       -        $103,433,044  77,437.5062 

Subscriptions - General Partner

   -       -      1,307,587  1,307.5870  1,307,587  1,307.5870 

Subscriptions - Limited Partners

   8,129,804  6,086.9360   -       -      8,129,804  6,086.9360 

Redemptions - General Partner

   (1,208,476 (904.7535 (250,000 (253.0390 (1,458,476 (1,157.7925

Redemptions - Limited Partners

   (18,696,366 (14,319.0700  -       -      (18,696,366 (14,319.0700

Net income (loss)

   (4,734,222  -      (42,674  -      (4,776,896  -     
  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Partners’ Capital, June 30, 2017

    $86,923,784  68,300.6187    $1,014,913  1,054.5480    $87,938,697  69,355.1667 
  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

See accompanying notes to financial statements.

 

5


Ceres Tactical Commodity L.P.

Notes to Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

 

1.

Organization:

Ceres Tactical Commodity L.P. (formerly, Managed Futures Premier Aventis II L.P.) (the “Partnership”) is a limited partnership organized on April 20, 2005 under the partnership laws of the State of New York to engage, directly orand indirectly, in the speculative trading of commodity interests on U.S. and international futures, options on futures and forward markets. The Partnership may also engage, directly or indirectly, in swap transactions and other derivative transactions with the approval of the General Partner (as defined below). Initially, the Partnership’s investment strategy focused on energy and energy-related investments. While the Partnership is expected to continue to have significant exposure to energy and energy-related markets, such trading will no longer be the Partnership’s primary focus. Therefore, the Partnership’s past trading performance will not necessarily be indicative of future results. The sectors traded include energy, grains, livestock, metals and softs. The commodity interests that are traded by the Partnership, directly or indirectly through its investment in the Funds (as defined below) are volatile and involve a high degree of market risk. The General Partner may also determine to invest up to all of the Partnership’s assets (directly or indirectly through its investment in the Funds (as defined below))Funds) in United States (“U.S.”) Treasury bills and/or money market mutual funds, including money market mutual funds managed by Morgan Stanley or its affiliates. During the initial offering period, the Partnership sold 11,925 redeemable units of limited partnership interest in the Partnership (“Redeemable Units”). The Partnership commenced trading on September 6, 2005. The Partnership privately and continuously offers Redeemable Units to qualified investors. There is no maximum number of Redeemable Units that may be sold by the Partnership.

Ceres Managed Futures LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, acts as the general partner (the “General Partner”) and commodity pool operator of the Partnership and iswas the trading manager (“Trading(the “Trading Manager”) of Harbour Square Master (as defined below). The General Partner is awholly-owned subsidiary of Morgan Stanley Domestic Holdings, Inc. (“MSD Holdings”). MSD Holdings is ultimately owned by Morgan Stanley. Morgan Stanley is a publicly held company whose shares are listed on the New York Stock Exchange. Morgan Stanley is engaged in various financial services and other businesses.

As of June 30, 2018, all trading decisions are made for the Partnership by Aventis Asset Management, LLC (“Aventis”), Millburn Ridgefield Corporation (“Millburn”), Ospraie Management LLC (“Ospraie”) and Harbour Square Capital Management LLC (“Harbour Square”) (each, an “Advisor” and, collectively, the “Advisors”), each of which is a registered commodity trading advisor. Each Advisor is allocated a portion of the Partnership’s assets to manage. The Partnership invests the portion of its assets allocated to each of the Advisors either directly, through individually managed accounts, or indirectly, through its investment in the Funds. The Advisors are not affiliated with one another, are not affiliated with the General Partner and MS&Co. and are not responsible for the organization or operation of the Partnership.

As of June 13, 2018, the Partnership began offering three classes of limited partnership interests, Class A Redeemable Units, Class D Redeemable Units and Class Z Redeemable Units. All Redeemable Units issued prior to October 31, 2016 were deemed “Class A Redeemable Units.” Class Z Redeemable Units were first issued on January 1, 2017. The rights, liabilities, risks and fees associated with investment in the Class A Redeemable Units were not changed. Class D Redeemable Units were first issued on July 1, 2018. The rights, liabilities, risks and fees associated with investment in the Class A Redeemable Units and Class Z Redeemable Units were not changed. Class A Redeemable Units, Class D Redeemable Units and Class Z Redeemable Units will each be referred to as a “Class” and collectively referred to as the “Classes.” The rights, liabilities, risks, and fees associated with investment in the Class A Redeemable Units and Class Z Redeemable Units were not changed. Class A Redeemable Units and Class D Redeemable Units are available to taxable U.S. individuals and institutions, U.S. tax exempt individuals and institutions andnon-U.S. investors. Class Z Redeemable Units are offered to limited partners who receive advisory services from Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC (doing business as Morgan Stanley Wealth Management) (“Morgan Stanley Wealth Management”) and may also be offered to certain employees of Morgan Stanley and/or its subsidiaries (and their family members). The Class of Redeemable Units that a limited partner of the Partnership receives upon subscription will generally depend upon the amount invested in the Partnership or the status of the limited partner, although the General Partner may determine to offer a particular Class of Redeemable Units to limited partners at its discretion. Class A Redeemable Units, Class D Redeemable Units and Class Z Redeemable Units are identical, except that Class A Redeemable Units are subject to a monthly ongoing selling agent fee equal to 2.0% per year1/12 of 2.00% (a 2.00% annual rate) of the Partnership’s adjustedmonth-endnet assets of Class A Redeemable Units,as of the end of each month, which differs from the Class D Redeemable Units are subject to a monthly ongoing selling agent fee equal toof 1/12 of 0.75% per year(a 0.75% annual rate) of the Partnership’s adjustedmonth-endnet assets of Class D Redeemable Units, andas of the end of each month. Class Z Redeemable Units are not subject to a monthly ongoing selling agent fee.

During the reporting periods ended June 30,March 31, 2019 and 2018, and 2017, the Partnership’s/Funds’ commodity broker was Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC (“MS&Co.”), a registered futures commission merchant. During prior periods included in this report, the Partnership/Funds also deposited a portion of their cash innon-trading bank accounts at JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.

As of March 31, 2019, all trading decisions are made for the Partnership by Millburn Ridgefield Corporation (“Millburn”), Ospraie Management, LLC (“Ospraie”), Aquantum GmbH (“Aquantum”) and Pan Capital Management L.P. (“Pan”) (each, an “Advisor” and, collectively, the “Advisors”), each, a registered commodity trading advisor. Effective November 30, 2018, Aventis Asset Management, LLC (“Aventis”) ceased to act as a commodity trading advisor to the Partnership. Effective March 31, 2019, Harbour Square Capital Management LLC (“Harbour Square”) ceased to act as a commodity trading advisor to the Partnership. Each Advisor is allocated a portion of the Partnership’s assets to manage. The Partnership invests the portion of its assets allocated to each of the Advisors either directly, through individually managed accounts, or indirectly through its investment in the Funds. References herein to the “Advisors” may also include, as relevant, Harbour Square and Aventis. The Advisors are not affiliated with one another, are not affiliated with the General Partner and MS&Co. and are not responsible for the organization or operation of the Partnership.

 

6


Ceres Tactical Commodity L.P.

Notes to Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

 

Millburn, Ospraie and OspraieAquantum directly trade the Partnership’s assets allocated to each Advisor through managed accounts in the name of the Partnership pursuant to Millburn’s Commodity Program, and Ospraie’s Commodity Program and Aquantum’s Commodity Spread Program, respectively. Effective January 1, 2019, Pan directly trades the Partnership’s assets allocated to it pursuant to Pan’s Energy Trading Program.

MB Master Fund L.P. (“MB Master”)The Partnership has entered, and (prior to their respective terminations) CMF Harbour Square Master Fund LLC (“Harbour Square Master”) haveand MB Master Fund L.P. (“MB Master”) had entered, into futures brokerage account agreements with MS&Co and foreign exchange brokerage account agreements with MS&Co. MBHarbour Square Master and Harbour SquareMB Master are collectively referred to as the “Funds.”

The Partnership’s/Funds’ trading of futures, forward, swap and option contracts, if applicable, on commodities is done primarily on U.S. commodity exchanges and foreign commodity exchanges. The Partnership/Funds engage in such trading through a commodity brokerage account maintained with MS&Co.

The Partnership has entered into futures brokerage account agreements with MS&Co. The Partnership, directly and through its investment in the Funds, pays MS&Co. (or will reimburse MS&Co. if previously paid) its allocable share of all trading fees for the clearing and, where applicable, the execution of transactions as well as exchange, user,give-up, floor brokerage and National Futures Association fees (collectively, the “clearing fees”).

The Partnership has entered into a selling agreement (as amended, the(the “Selling Agreement”) with Morgan Stanley Wealth Management. Pursuant to the Selling Agreement, the Partnership pays Morgan Stanley Wealth Management a monthly ongoing selling agent fee at the rates described above. The ongoing selling agent fee received by Morgan Stanley Wealth Management is shared with the properly registered or exempted financial advisors of Morgan Stanley Wealth Management who have sold Class A Redeemable Units and Class D Redeemable Units in the Partnership.

The General Partner fees, management fees, incentive fees and professional fees of the Partnership are allocated proportionally to each Class based on the net asset value of each Class.

In July 2015, the General Partner delegated certain administrative functions to SS&C Technologies, Inc., a Delaware corporation, currently doing business as SS&C GlobeOp (the “Administrator”). Pursuant to a master services agreement, the Administrator furnishes certain administrative, accounting, regulatory reporting, tax and other services as agreed from time to time. In addition, the Administrator maintains certain books and records of the Partnership. The cost of retaining the Administrator is allocated among the pools operated by the General Partner, including the Partnership.

 

2.

Basis of Presentation and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies:

The accompanying financial statements and accompanying notes are unaudited but, in the opinion of the General Partner, include all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments, necessary for a fair presentation of the Partnership’s financial condition at June 30, 2018,March 31, 2019 and the results of its operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017 and changes in partners’ capital for the sixthree months ended June 30, 2018March 31, 2019 and 2017.2018. These financial statements present the results forof interim periods and do not include all disclosures normally provided in annual financial statements. These financial statements should be read together with the financial statements and notes included in the Partnership’s Annual Report on Form10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) for the year ended December 31, 2017.2018. The December 31, 20172018 information has been derived from the audited financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2017.2018.

Due to the nature of commodity trading, the results of operations for the interim periods presented should not be considered indicative of the results that may be expected for the entire year.

Use of Estimates.The preparation of financial statements and accompanying notes in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) requires the General Partner to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, income and expenses, and related disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities in the financial statements and accompanying notes. As a result, actual results could differ from these estimates, and those differences could be material.

Profit AllocationAllocation.. The General Partner and each limited partner of the Partnership share in the profits and losses of the Partnership in proportion to the amount of Partnership interest owned by each, except that no limited partner is liable for obligations of the Partnership in excess of its capital contributioncontributions and profits, if any, net of distributions or redemptions and losses, if any.

 

7


Ceres Tactical Commodity L.P.

Notes to Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

 

Statement of Cash Flows.The Partnership has not provided a Statement of Cash Flows, as permitted by Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 230,“Statement of Cash Flows.” The Statements of Changes in Partners’ Capital is included herein, and as of and for the periods ended June 30,March 31, 2019 and 2018, and 2017, the Partnership carried no debt and all of the Partnership’s and the Funds’ investments were carried at fair value and classified as Level 1 and Level 2 measurements.

Partnership’s Investment in the Funds.The Partnership carriescarried its investment in the Funds based on the Partnership’s (1) net contribution to the Funds and (2) its allocated share of the undistributed profits and losses, including realized gains or losses and net change in unrealized gains or losses, of the Funds.

Partnership’s/Funds’ Derivative Investments.All commodity interests held by the Partnership/Funds, including derivative financial instruments and derivative commodity instruments, are held for trading purposes. The commodity interests are recorded on the trade date and open contracts are recorded at fair value (as described in Note 5, “Fair Value Measurements”) at the measurement date. Investments in commodity interests denominated in foreign currencies are translated into U.S. dollars at the exchange rates prevailing at the measurement date. Gains or losses are realized when contracts are liquidated and are determined using thefirst-in,first-out method. UnrealizedNet unrealized gains or losses on open contracts are included as a component of equity in trading account in the Partnership’s/Funds’ Statements of Financial Condition. Net realized gains or losses and net change in unrealized gains or losses are included in the Partnership’s/Funds’ Statements of Income and Expenses.

The Partnership/Funds do not isolate the portion of the results of operations arising from the effect of changes in foreign exchange rates on investments due to fluctuations from changes in market prices of investments held. Such fluctuations are included in total trading results in the Partnership’s/Funds’ Statements of Income and Expenses.

Partnership’s Cash. The Partnership’s restricted cash is equal to the cash portion of assets on deposit to meet margin requirements, as determined by the exchange or counterparty, and required by MS&Co. At June 30, 2018March 31, 2019 and December 31, 2017,2018, the amount of cash held for margin requirements was $4,452,352$6,043,987 and $0,$7,608,136, respectively. Cash that is not classified as restricted cash is therefore classified as unrestricted cash. The Partnership’s restricted and unrestricted cash includes cash denominated in foreign currencies of $155,357 (cost($21,447) (proceeds of $165,223)$18,992) and $0 (cost($142,547) (proceeds of $0)$141,947) as of June 30, 2018March 31, 2019 and December 31, 2017,2018, respectively.

Income Taxes.Income taxes have not been recorded as each partner is individually liable for the taxes, if any, on its share of the Partnership’s income and expenses. The Partnership follows the guidance of ASC 740,“Income Taxes,” which prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for financial statement recognition and measurement of tax positions taken or expected to be taken in the course of preparing the Partnership’s tax returns to determine whether the tax positions are“more-likely-than-not” of being sustained “when challenged” or “when examined” by the applicable tax authority. Tax positions determined not to meet themore-likely-than-not threshold would be recorded as a tax benefit or liability in the Partnership’s Statements of Financial Condition for the current year. If a tax position does not meet the minimum statutory threshold to avoid the incurring of penalties, an expense for the amount of the statutory penalty and interest, if applicable, shall be recognized in the Statements of Income and Expenses in the period in which the position is claimed or expected to be claimed. The General Partner has concluded that there are no significant uncertain tax positions that would require recognition in the financial statements. The Partnership files U.S. federal and various state and local tax returns. No income tax returns are currently under examination. The 20142015 through 20172018 tax years remain subject to examination by U.S. federal and most state tax authorities.

Investment Company Status.Effective January 1, 2014, the Partnership adopted Accounting StandardStandards Update2013-08,, “Financial“Financial Services — Investment Companies (Topic 946): Amendments to the Scope, Measurement and Disclosure Requirements” and based on the General Partner’s assessment, the Partnership has been deemed to be an investment company since inception. Accordingly, the Partnership follows the investment company accounting and reporting guidance of Topic 946 and reflects its investments at fair value with unrealized gains and losses resulting from changes in fair value reflected in the Statements of Income and Expenses.

Net Income (Loss) per Redeemable Unit.Net income (loss) per Redeemable Unit for each Class is calculated in accordance with ASC 946,Financial Services Investment CompaniesCompanies.”.” See Note 3, “Financial Highlights.”

There have been no material changes with respect to the Partnership’s critical accounting policies as reported in the Partnership’s Annual Report on Form10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017.2018.

 

8


Ceres Tactical Commodity L.P.

Notes to Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

 

3.

Financial Highlights:

Financial highlights for the limited partner classClasses as a whole for the three and six months ended June 30,March 31, 2019 and 2018 and 2017 were as follows:follows. There were no Class D limited partner Redeemable Units held prior to July 1, 2018. There were no Class Z limited partner Redeemable Units held prior to February 1, 2019.

 

Class A

 Three Months Ended
June 30,
 Six Months Ended
June 30,
  2018 2017 2018 2017

Per Redeemable Unit Performance (for a unit outstanding throughout the period):*

    

Net realized and unrealized gains (losses)

   $38.96    $(14.93   $69.24    $(27.57

Net investment loss

  (22.74  (17.93  (39.85  (35.47
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Increase (decrease) for the period

  16.22   (32.86  29.39   (63.04

Net asset value per Redeemable Unit, beginning of period

  1,278.81   1,305.52   1,265.64   1,335.70 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net asset value per Redeemable Unit, end of period

   $  1,295.03    $  1,272.66    $  1,295.03    $  1,272.66 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

                                                                                    
 Three Months Ended
June 30,
 Six Months Ended
June 30,
   Three Months Ended Three Months Ended 
         2018                 2017                 2018         2017           March 31, 2019 March 31, 2018 

Ratios to Average Limited Partners’ Capital:**

    

Net investment loss***

 (5.6)  %  (5.7)   (5.7)   (5.6)  
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

         Class A       Class D Class Z** Class A 

Per Redeemable Unit Performance (for a unit outstanding throughout the period):*

     

Net realized and unrealized gains (losses)

    $55.85      $43.48      $46.48      $30.40   

Net investment loss

   (17.21)    (10.17)    (5.30)    (17.23)  
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Increase (decrease) for the period

   38.64     33.31     41.18     13.17   

Net asset value per Redeemable Unit, beginning of period

   1,300.66     1,010.75     1,008.04     1,265.64   
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Net asset value per Redeemable Unit, end of period

    $1,339.30      $1,044.06      $1,049.22      $1,278.81   
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 
  Three Months Ended Three Months Ended 
  March 31, 2019 March 31, 2018 
  Class A Class D Class Z** Class A 

Ratios to Average Limited Partners’ Capital:***

     

Net investment loss****

   (4.3)  %   (3.0)  %   (2.1)  %   (5.2)  % 
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Operating expenses

 6.7   %  6.4    6.6    6.2      6.2   %   4.8   %   4.1   %   6.5   % 

Incentive fees

 0.5   %  -       0.6    -         0.3   %   0.3   %   0.2   %   0.1   % 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total expenses

 7.2   %  6.4    7.2    6.2      6.5   %   5.1   %   4.3   %   6.6   % 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total return:

         

Total return before incentive fees

 1.8   %  (2.5)   2.9    (4.7)     3.3   %   3.6   %   4.3   %   1.1   % 

Incentive fees

 (0.5)  %  -       (0.6)   -         (0.3)  %   (0.3)  %   (0.2)  %   (0.1)  % 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total return after incentive fees

 1.3   %  (2.5)   2.3    (4.7)     3.0   %   3.3   %   4.1   %   1.0   % 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

 

*

Net investment loss per Redeemable Unit is calculated by dividing the interest income less total expenses by the average number of Redeemable Units outstanding during the period. The net realized and unrealized gains (losses) per Redeemable Unit is a balancing amount necessary to reconcile the change in net asset value per Redeemable Unit with the other per unit information.

 

**

Annualized (except for incentive fees, if applicable)For the period from February 1, 2019 to March 31, 2019.

 

***

Annualized (except for incentive fees).

****

Interest income including interest income allocated from the Funds, less total expenses, net of expense reimbursements.expenses.

The above ratios and total return may vary for individual investors based on the timing of capital transactions during the period. Additionally, these ratios are calculated for the limited partner classClasses using the limited partners’ share of income, expenses and average partners’ capital of the Partnership and include the income and expenses allocated from the Funds.

 

4.

Trading Activities:

The Partnership was formed for the purpose of trading contracts in a variety of commodity interests, including derivative financial instruments and derivative commodity instruments.interests. The results of the Partnership’s trading activities are shown in the Statements of Income and Expenses. The Partnership also invests certain of its assets through a “master/feeder” structure. The Partnership’spro-rata share of the results of the Funds’ trading activities is shown in the Partnership’s Statements of Income and Expenses.

 

9


Ceres Tactical Commodity L.P.

Notes to Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

 

The futures brokerage account agreements with MS&Co. give the Partnership and the Funds, respectively, the legal right to net unrealized gains and losses on open futures forward and optionforward contracts in thetheir respective Statements of Financial Condition. The Partnership and the Funds net, for financial reporting purposes, the unrealized gains and losses on open futures and open forward contracts in thetheir respective Statements of Financial Condition, as the criteria under ASC210-20,Balance Sheet,,” have been met.

All of the commodity interests owned directly by the Partnership are held for trading purposes. All of the commodity interests owned by the Funds are held for trading purposes. The monthly average number of futures contracts traded directly by the Partnership during the three and six months ended June 30,March 31, 2019 and 2018 were 4,28526,535 and 4,258,4,231, respectively. The monthly average number of metals forward contracts traded directly by the Partnership during the three and six months ended June 30,March 31, 2019 and 2018 were 1,2721,509 and 818,365, respectively. The monthly average number of option contracts traded directly by the Partnership during the three and six months ended June 30,March 31, 2019 and 2018 were 1,4412,038 and 1,103,765, respectively.

There were no direct investments at December 31, 2017.

Trading and transaction fees are based on the number of trades executed by the Advisors for the Partnership/Funds and the Partnership’s respective percentage ownership of each Fund.

All clearing fees paid to MS&Co. are borne directly by the Partnership for its direct trading. In addition, clearing fees are borne by the Funds for indirect trading and allocated to the Funds’ limited partners/members, including the Partnership.

The following table summarizestables summarize the gross and net amounts recognized relating to assets and liabilities of the Partnership’s derivatives and their offsetting subject to master netting arrangements or similar agreements as of June 30, 2018.March 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, respectively.

 

                                                                                                                              
   

Gross Amounts

 

Offset in the

 

Amounts

 

Presented in the

 Gross Amounts Not Offset in the

 

Statements of Financial Condition

       Gross Amounts Amounts  Gross Amounts Not Offset in the   
    Offset in the Presented in the  Statements of Financial Condition   
 Gross Statements of Statements of   Cash Collateral     Gross Statements of Statements of     Cash Collateral   
  Amounts Financial Financial  Financial  Received/   
 Amounts Financial Financial Financial Received/   

June 30, 2018

 Recognized Condition Condition Instruments Pledged* Net Amount 

March 31, 2019

  Recognized Condition Condition  Instruments  Pledged*  Net Amount

Assets

                

MS&Co.

      

Futures

   $3,377,038    $(3,377,038   $-        $-        $-        $-         $5,937,283    $(5,415,121 $522,162     $-         $-         $522,162 

Forwards

 2,819,788  (2,819,788  -       -       -       -        1,430,879   (1,232,616  198,263    -        -        198,263 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

Total assets

   $6,196,826    $(6,196,826   $-        $-        $-        $-         $7,368,162    $(6,647,737 $720,425     $-         $-         $720,425 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

Liabilities

                

MS&Co.

      

Futures

   $(3,570,150   $3,377,038    $(193,112   $-        $-        $(193,112)     $(5,415,121   $5,415,121    $-         $-         $-         $-     

Forwards

 (2,871,687 2,819,788  (51,899  -       -      (51,899)    (1,232,616  1,232,616   -        -        -        -     
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

Total liabilities

   $(6,441,837   $6,196,826    $(245,011   $-        $-        $(245,011)     $(6,647,737   $6,647,737    $-         $-         $-         $-     
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

Net fair value

        $(245,011) *             $720,425
      

 

           

 

10


Ceres Tactical Commodity L.P.

Notes to Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

                                                                                                                              
     Gross Amounts Amounts Gross Amounts Not Offset in the   
     Offset in the Presented in the Statements of Financial Condition   
   Gross Statements of Statements of    Cash Collateral   
   Amounts Financial Financial Financial  Received/   

December 31, 2018

  Recognized Condition Condition Instruments  Pledged*  Net Amount

Assets

         

Futures

    $6,579,887    $(4,822,376   $1,757,511    $-         $-         $1,757,511 

Forwards

   2,203,511   (2,203,511  -       -        -        -     
  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total assets

    $8,783,398    $(7,025,887   $1,757,511    $-         $-         $1,757,511 
  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

Liabilities

         

Futures

    $(4,822,376   $4,822,376    $-        $-         $-         $-     

Forwards

   (2,567,628  2,203,511   (364,117  -        364,117    -     
  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total liabilities

    $(7,390,004   $7,025,887    $(364,117   $-         $364,117     $-     
  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net fair value

           $1,757,511
         

 

 

 

 

*

In the event of default by the Partnership, MS&Co., the Partnership’s commodity futures broker and the sole counterparty to the Partnership’snon-exchange-traded contracts, as applicable, has the right to offset the Partnership’s obligation with the Partnership’s cash and/or U.S. Treasury bills held by MS&Co., thereby minimizing MS&Co.’s risk of loss. In certain instances, MS&Co. may not post collateral and as such, in the event of default by MS&Co., the Partnership is exposed to the amount shown in the Statements of Financial Condition. In the case of exchange-traded contracts, the Partnership’s exposure to counterparty risk may be reduced since the exchange’s clearinghouse interposes its credit between buyer and seller and the clearinghouse’s guarantee funds may be available in the event of a default.

 

10

11


Ceres Tactical Commodity L.P.

Notes to Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

 

The following table indicatestables indicate the gross fair values of derivative instruments of futures, forward and option contracts held directly by the Partnership as separate assets and liabilities as of June 30, 2018. As ofMarch 31, 2019 and December 31, 2017, no derivative instruments were held directly by the Partnership.2018, respectively.

 

   June 30,

            2018             

March 31,
2019 

Assets

  

Futures Contracts

  

Energy

    $2,469,1804,382,299   

Grains

   414,541518,524   

Livestock

   63,310468,513   

Metals

   62,44473,697   

Softs

   367,563494,250   
  

 

 

 

Total unrealized appreciation on open futures contracts

   3,377,0385,937,283   
  

 

 

 

Liabilities

  

Futures Contracts

  

Currencies

(42,984)

Energy

   (2,096,896)(4,076,242)  

Grains

   (1,123,087)(327,442)  

Livestock

   (32,610)(182,230)  

Metals

   (177,867)(103,664)  

Softs

   (96,706)(725,543)  
  

 

 

 

Total unrealized depreciation on open futures contracts

   (3,570,150)(5,415,121)  
  

 

 

 

Net unrealized depreciationappreciation on open futures contracts

    $(193,112)522,162   * 
  

 

 

 

Assets

  

Forward Contracts

  

Metals

    $2,819,7881,430,879   
  

 

 

 

Total unrealized appreciation on open forward contracts

   2,819,7881,430,879   
  

 

 

 

Liabilities

  

Forward Contracts

  

Metals

   (2,871,687)(1,232,616)  
  

 

 

 

Total unrealized depreciation on open forward contracts

   (2,871,687)(1,232,616)  
  

 

 

 

Net unrealized depreciationappreciation on open forward contracts

    $(51,899)198,263   ** 
  

 

 

 

Assets

  

Options Purchased

  

Energy

    $15034,614   

Grains

   48,2885,100  

Livestock

117,840   

Metals

   771,395867,200   

Softs

   12,775124,061   
  

 

 

 

Total options purchased

    $832,6081,148,815   *** 
  

 

 

 

Liabilities

  

Options Written

  

Energy

    $(23,686)(11,737)  

Grains

   (303,563)(47,813) 

Livestock

(27,490)  

Metals

   (1,045,054)(1,043,807) 

Softs

(37,440)  
  

 

 

 

Total options written

    $(1,372,303)(1,168,287)  **** 
  

 

 

 

 

*

This amount is in “Net unrealized appreciation on open futures contracts” in the Statements of Financial Condition.

**

This amount is in “Net unrealized appreciation on open forward contracts” in the Statements of Financial Condition.

***

This amount is in “Options purchased, at fair value” in the Statements of Financial Condition.

****

This amount is in “Options written, at fair value” in the Statements of Financial Condition.

12


Ceres Tactical Commodity L.P.

Notes to Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

December 31,
2018

Assets

Futures Contracts

Currencies

  $14,578  

Energy

5,628,038  

Grains

157,540  

Livestock

317,100  

Metals

125,934  

Softs

336,697  

Total unrealized appreciation on open futures contracts

6,579,887  

Liabilities

Futures Contracts

Currencies

(1,159) 

Energy

(3,938,643) 

Grains

(66,943) 

Livestock

(252,835) 

Metals

(295,124) 

Softs

(267,672) 

Total unrealized depreciation on open futures contracts

(4,822,376) 

Net unrealized appreciation on open futures contracts

  $1,757,511   * 

Assets

Forward Contracts

Metals

  $2,203,511  

Total unrealized appreciation on open forward contracts

2,203,511  

Liabilities

Forward Contracts

Metals

(2,567,628) 

Total unrealized depreciation on open forward contracts

(2,567,628) 

Net unrealized depreciation on open forward contracts

  $(364,117)  ** 

Assets

Options Purchased

Energy

  $35,640  

Grains

27,500  

Livestock

19,620  

Metals

222,454  

Total options purchased

  $        305,214   *** 

Liabilities

Options Written

Energy

  $(34,760) 

Livestock

(17,820) 

Metals

(239,069) 

Softs

(117,922) 

Total options written

  $(409,571)  **** 

*

This amount is in “Net unrealized appreciation on open futures contracts” in the Statements of Financial Condition.

**

This amount is in “Net unrealized depreciation on open forward contracts” in the Statements of Financial Condition.

***

This amount is in “Options purchased, at fair value” in the Statements of Financial Condition.

****

This amount is in “Options written, at fair value” in the Statements of Financial Condition.

 

11

13


Ceres Tactical Commodity L.P.

Notes to Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

 

The following table indicates the trading gains and losses, by market sector, on derivative instruments traded directly by the Partnership for the three and six months ended June 30,March 31, 2019 and 2018. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2017, no derivative instruments were traded directly by the Partnership.

 

                                          
  Three Months Ended March 31, 
Sector       Three Months Ended    
June 30, 2018
     Six Months Ended    
June 30, 2018
   2019 2018 

Currencies

    $(314,000)    $(286,471)     $83,307      $27,529   

Energy

   2,261,423   2,856,161     2,107,903     594,738   

Grains

   (600,462)  (443,885)    172,807     156,577   

Interest RatesNon-U.S.

   -       17,430     -         17,430   

Livestock

   141,540   324,559     1,419,642     183,019   

Metals

   412,631   402,254     864,560     (10,377)  

Softs

   621,826   260,565     (130,222)    (361,261)  
  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

 

Total

    $2,522,958   *****    $3,130,613   *****     $          4,517,997   *****    $                607,655   ***** 
  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

 

*****

*****

This amount is included in “Total trading results” in the Statements of Income and Expenses.

 

5.

Fair Value Measurements:

Partnership’s and the Funds’ Fair Value MeasurementsMeasurements.. Fair value is defined as the value that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date under current market conditions. The fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1) and the lowest priority to fair values derived from unobservable inputs (Level 3). The level in the fair value hierarchy within which the fair value measurement in its entirety falls shall be determined based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety.

The fair value of exchange-traded futures, option and forward contracts is determined by the various exchanges, and reflects the settlement price for each contract as of the close of business on the last business day of the reporting period. The fair value of foreign currency forward contracts is extrapolated on a forward basis from the spot prices quoted as of approximately 3:00 P.M. (E.T.) on the last business day of the reporting period from various exchanges. The fair value ofnon-exchange-traded foreign currency option contracts is calculated by applying an industry standard model application for options valuation of foreign currency options, using as inputsinput the spot prices, interest rates, and option implied volatilities quoted as of approximately 3:00 P.M. (E.T.) on the last business day of the reporting period. U.S. Treasury bills are valued at the last available bid price received from independent pricing services as of the close of the last business day of the reporting period.

The Partnership and the Funds consider prices for commodity futures, swap and option contracts to be based on unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets and liabilities (Level 1). The values of U.S. Treasury bills,non-exchange-traded forward, swap and certain option contracts for which market quotations are not readily available are priced by pricing services that derive fair values for those assets and liabilities from observable inputs (Level 2). As of June 30, 2018March 31, 2019 and December 31, 20172018 and for the periods ended June 30,March 31, 2019 and 2018, and 2017, the Partnership and the Funds did not hold any derivative instruments that were priced at fair value using unobservable inputs through the application of the General Partner’s assumptions and internal valuation pricing models (Level 3). Transfers between levels are recognized at the beginning of the reporting period. During the reporting periods, there were no transfers of assets or liabilities between Level 1 and Level 2.

 

12

14


Ceres Tactical Commodity L.P.

Notes to Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

 

                                                                                                            

June 30, 2018

             Total                         Level 1                         Level 2                         Level 3            

March 31, 2019

  Total  Level 1  Level 2  Level 3

Assets

            

Futures

   $        3,377,038    $        3,377,038    $-        $            -         $5,937,283     $5,937,283     $-         $-     

Forwards

 2,819,788   -      2,819,788   -        1,430,879    -        1,430,879    -     

Options purchased

 832,608  832,608   -       -        1,148,815    1,148,815    -        -     
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

Total assets

   $7,029,434    $4,209,646    $2,819,788    $-         $8,516,977     $7,086,098     $1,430,879     $-     
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

Liabilities

            

Futures

   $3,570,150    $3,570,150    $-        $-         $5,415,121     $5,415,121     $-         $-     

Forwards

 2,871,687   -      2,871,687   -        1,232,616    -        1,232,616    -     

Options written

 1,372,303  1,372,303   -       -        1,168,287    1,168,287    -        -     
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

Total liabilities

   $7,814,140     $4,942,453     $2,871,687     $-          $7,816,024     $6,583,408     $1,232,616     $-     
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

December 31, 2018

  Total  Level 1  Level 2  Level 3

Assets

        

Futures

    $6,579,887     $6,579,887     $-         $-     

Forwards

   2,203,511    -        2,203,511    -     

Options purchased

   305,214    305,214    -        -     
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

Total assets

    $9,088,612     $6,885,101     $2,203,511     $-     
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

Liabilities

        

Futures

    $4,822,376     $4,822,376     $-         $-     

Forwards

   2,567,628    -        2,567,628    -     

Options written

   409,571    409,571    -        -     
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

Total liabilities

    $7,799,575     $5,231,947     $2,567,628     $-     
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

6.

Investment in the Funds:

On February 1, 2013, the Partnership allocated substantially all of its capital to MB Master, a limited partnership organized under the partnership laws of the State of Delaware. MB Master permits accounts managed by Aventis usingEffective November 30, 2018, the Partnership fully redeemed its Aventis Diversified Commodity Strategy, a proprietary, discretionary trading system, to invest togetherinvestment in one trading vehicle. The General Partner is also the general partner of MB Master. Individual and pooled accounts currently managed by Aventis, including the Partnership, are permitted to be limited partners of MB Master. The General Partner and Aventis believe that trading through this master/feeder structure should promote efficiency and economy in the trading process.

On January 1, 2018, the Partnership allocated a portion of its assets to Harbour Square Master, a limited liability company organized under the limited liability company laws of the State of Delaware. Harbour Square Master permitspermitted accounts managed by Harbour Square using Harbour Square’s Discretionary Energy Program, a proprietary, discretionary trading system, to invest together in one trading vehicle. The General Partner is alsoEffective March 31, 2019, the trading manager ofPartnership fully redeemed its investment in Harbour Square Master. Individual and pooled accounts currently managed by Harbour Square, including the Partnership, are permitted to be members of Harbour Square Master. The Trading Manager and Harbour Square believe that trading through this structure promotes efficiency and economy in the trading process. The Trading Manager and Harbour Square have agreed that Harbour Square will trade the Fund’s assets allocated to Harbour Square Master at a level that is up to 1.5 times the amount of the assets allocated. The amount of leverage may be changed in the future.

The General Partner is not aware of any material changes to the trading programs discussed above or in Note 1, “Organization” during the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2018.March 31, 2019.

The Partnership’s/Funds’ and the Partnership’s trading of futures, forward, swap and option contracts, asif applicable, on commodities is done primarily on U.S. commodity exchanges and foreign commodity exchanges. The Partnership/Funds and the Partnership engage in such trading through commodity brokerage accounts maintained with MS&Co.

15


Ceres Tactical Commodity L.P.

Notes to Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

Generally, a limited partner/member in the Funds withdrawswithdrew all or part of its capital contribution and undistributed profits, if any, from the Funds as of the end of any month (the “Redemption Date”) after a request hashad been made to the General Partner/Trading Manager at least three days in advance of the Redemption Date. Such withdrawals arewere classified as a liability when the limited partner/member electselected to redeem and informsinformed the Funds. However, a limited partner/member may requestcould have requested a withdrawal as of the end of any day if such request iswas received by the General Partner/Trading Manager at least three days in advance of the proposed withdrawal day.date.

Management fees, General Partner fees, ongoing selling agent fees and incentive fees are charged at the Partnership level. All clearing fees paid to MS&Co. are borne directly by the Partnership for its direct trading. In addition, clearing fees arewere borne by the Funds and allocated to the Funds’ limited partners,partners/members, including the Partnership. Professional fees arewere borne by the Funds and allocated to the Partnership, and also charged directly at the Partnership level.

13


Ceres Tactical Commodity L.P.

Notes to Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

As of the close of business on March 31, 2019, the Partnership did not have ownership in any of the Funds. At June 30,December 31, 2018, the Partnership owned approximately 48.6% of MB Master and 57.9%68.7% of Harbour Square Master. Prior to the close of business on December 31, 2017, the Partnership owned approximately 89.3% of MB Master. It is the Partnership’s intention to continue to invest in the Funds. The performance of the Partnership iswas directly affected by the performance of the Funds. Expenses to investors as a result of the investment in the Funds arewas approximately the same as they would be if the Partnership traded directly and redemption rights arewere not affected.

Summarized information reflecting the total assets, liabilities and partners’members’ capital of the FundsHarbour Square Master is shown in the following tables:

 

                                                                                 
  March 31, 2019
  Total Assets Total Liabilities  Total Capital

Harbour Square Master

    $5,311,909    $5,311,909     $-     
  December 31, 2018
  Total Assets Total Liabilities  Total Capital

Harbour Square Master

    $10,504,910    $2,532,233     $7,972,677 

Summarized information reflecting the net investment income (loss), total trading results and net income (loss) of Harbour Square Master is shown in the following tables:

Summarized information reflecting the net investment income (loss), total trading results and net income (loss) of Harbour Square Master is shown in the following tables:

 

  For the three months ended March 31, 2019
  Net Investment Total Trading   
  Income (Loss) Results  Net Income (Loss)

Harbour Square Master

    $(14,678   $160,848     $146,170 
  For the three months ended March 31, 2018
  June 30, 2018   Net Investment Total Trading   
  Total Assets   Total Liabilities   Total Capital   Income (Loss) Results  Net Income (Loss)

MB Master

    $18,290,522      $1,283,729      $17,006,793      $5,533    $1,022,312     $1,027,845 

Harbour Square Master

   26,812,602     218,340     26,594,262     65,272   866,131    931,403 
  December 31, 2017 
  Total Assets   Total Liabilities   Total Capital 

MB Master

    $87,348,208      $9,978,681      $77,369,527  

Summarized information reflecting the net investment income (loss), total trading results and net income (loss) of the Funds is shown in the following tables:

 

  For the three months ended June 30, 2018 
  Net Investment
        Income (Loss)        
           Total Trading        
Results
     Net Income (Loss)   

MB Master

    $(6,603)      $(976,916)      $(983,519)  

Harbour Square Master

   76,151      9,930      86,081   
  For the six months ended June 30, 2018 
  Net Investment
        Income (Loss)        
           Total Trading        
Results
     Net Income (Loss)   

MB Master

    $(1,070)      $45,396       $44,326   

Harbour Square Master

   141,423      876,061      1,017,484   
  For the three months ended June 30, 2017 
  Net Investment
        Income (Loss)        
           Total Trading        
Results
     Net Income (Loss)   

MB Master

    $(214,753)      $(1,122,688)      $(1,337,441)  
  For the six months ended June 30, 2017 
  Net Investment
        Income (Loss)        
           Total Trading        
Results
     Net Income (Loss)   

MB Master

    $(407,668)      $(2,258,372)      $(2,666,040)  

 

14

16


Ceres Tactical Commodity L.P.

Notes to Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

 

Summarized information reflecting the Partnership’s investments in and the Partnership’spro-rata share of the results of operations of the Funds is shown in the following table:tables:

 

                                                                                                                                                                        
  June 30, 2018  For the three months ended June 30, 2018         March 31, 2019  For the three months ended March 31, 2019      
  % of      Expenses  Net         % of       Expenses  Net      
  Partners’ Fair  Income Clearing  Professional  Income Investment   Redemptions   Partners’ Fair  Income  Clearing  Professional  Income  Investment  Redemptions

Funds

  Capital Value  (Loss) Fees  Fees  (Loss) Objective   Permitted 

MB Master

   12.91  $8,270,055   $(447,089)    $64,826    $8,211    $(520,126 Commodity Portfolio    Monthly 

Fund

  Capital Value  (Loss)  Fees  Fees  (Loss)  Objective  Permitted

Harbour Square Master

   24.08 15,422,221    51,813  12,081    10,070    29,662  Commodity Portfolio    Monthly    -   $-         $141,964     $7,656     $29,566     $104,742    Commodity Portfolio    Monthly 
   

 

  

 

 

 

  

 

  

 

      

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

    

Total

    $23,692,276    $(395,276  $76,907    $18,281    $(490,464        $-         $141,964     $7,656     $29,566     $104,742     
   

 

  

 

 

 

  

 

  

 

      

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

    
  June 30, 2018  For the six months ended June 30, 2018         December 31, 2018  For the three months ended March 31, 2018      
  % of      Expenses  Net         % of       Expenses  Net      
  Partners’ Fair  Income Clearing  Professional  Income Investment   Redemptions   Partners’ Fair  Income  Clearing  Professional  Income  Investment  Redemptions

Funds

  Capital Value  (Loss) Fees  Fees  (Loss) Objective   Permitted   Capital Value  (Loss)  Fees  Fees  (Loss)  Objective  Permitted

MB Master

   12.91  $8,270,055    $76,657   $114,044    $16,609    $(53,996 Commodity Portfolio    Monthly 

MB Master(a)

   -   $-         $523,746     $49,218     $8,398     $466,130    Commodity Portfolio    Monthly 

Harbour Square Master

   24.08 15,422,221    648,037  21,312    20,766    605,959  Commodity Portfolio    Monthly    9.43  5,489,732    596,224    9,231    10,696    576,297    Commodity Portfolio    Monthly 
   

 

  

 

 

 

  

 

  

 

      

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

    

Total

    $23,692,276    $724,694   $135,356    $37,375    $551,963         $5,489,732     $1,119,970     $58,449     $19,094     $1,042,427     
   

 

  

 

 

 

  

 

  

 

      

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

    
  December 31, 2017  For the three months ended June 30, 2017       
  % of      Expenses  Net       
  Partners’ Fair  Income Clearing  Professional  Income Investment   Redemptions 

Funds

  Capital Value  (Loss) Fees  Fees  (Loss) Objective   Permitted 

MB Master

   99.95  $69,682,811    $(804,325  $374,658    $13,960    $(1,192,943 Commodity Portfolio    Monthly 
   

 

  

 

 

 

  

 

  

 

   

Total

    $69,682,811    $(804,325  $374,658    $13,960    $(1,192,943   
   

 

  

 

 

 

  

 

  

 

   
  December 31, 2017  For the six months ended June 30, 2017       
  % of      Expenses  Net       
  Partners’ Fair  Income Clearing  Professional  Income Investment   Redemptions 

Funds

  Capital Value  (Loss) Fees  Fees  (Loss) Objective   Permitted 

MB Master

   99.95  $69,682,811    $(1,703,881  $685,656    $28,108    $(2,417,645 Commodity Portfolio    Monthly 
   

 

  

 

 

 

  

 

  

 

   

Total

    $69,682,811    $(1,703,881  $685,656    $28,108    $(2,417,645   
   

 

  

 

 

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

15


Ceres Tactical Commodity L.P.

Notes to Financial Statements

(Unaudited)
(a)

The Partnership fully redeemed its investment in MB Master as of November 30, 2018.

 

7.

7.    Financial Instrument Risks:

In the normal course of business, the Partnership and the Funds are parties to financial instruments withoff-balance-sheet risk, including derivative financial instruments and derivative commodity instruments. These financial instruments may include forwards, futures, options and swaps, whose values are based upon an underlying asset, index, or reference rate, and generally represent future commitments to exchange currencies or cash balances, to purchase or sell other financial instruments at specific terms at specified future dates, or, in the case of derivative commodity instruments, to have a reasonable possibility to be settled in cash, through physical delivery or with another financial instrument. These instruments may be traded on an exchange, a swap execution facility orover-the-counter (“OTC”). Exchange-traded instruments include futures and certain standardized forward, swap and option contracts. Specific market movements of commodities or futures contracts underlying an option cannot accurately be predicted. The purchaser of an option may lose the entire premium paid for the option. The writer or seller of an option has unlimited risk. Certain swap contracts may also be traded on a swap execution facility or OTC. OTC contracts are negotiated between contracting parties and also include certain forward and option contracts. Each of these instruments is subject to various risks similar to those related to the underlying financial instruments, including market and credit risk. In general, the risks associated with OTC contracts are greater than those associated with exchange-traded instruments because of the greater risk of default by the counterparty to an OTC contract. None of the Partnership’s/Funds’ contracts are traded OTC, although contracts may be traded OTC in the future.

Futures Contracts. The Partnership and the Funds trade futures contracts. A futures contract is a firm commitment to buy or sell a specified quantity of investments, currency or a standardized amount of a deliverable grade commodity, at a specified price on a specified future date, unless the contract is closed before the delivery date or the delivery quantity is something where physical delivery cannot occur (such as the S&P 500 Index), whereby such contract is settled in cash. Payments (“variation margin”) may be made or received by the Partnership and the Funds each business day, depending on the daily fluctuations in the value of the underlying contracts, and are recorded as unrealized gains or losses by the Partnership and the Funds. When the contract is closed, the Partnership and the Funds record a realized gain or loss equal to the difference between the value of the contract at the time it was opened and the value at the time it was closed. Transactions in futures contracts require participants to make both initial margin deposits of cash or other assets and variation margin deposits, through the futures broker, directly with the exchange on which the contracts are traded. Net realized gains (losses) and net change in unrealized gains (losses) on futures contracts are included in the Partnership’s/Funds’ Statements of Income and Expenses.

Forward Foreign Currency Contracts. Forward foreign currency contracts are those contracts where the Partnership and the Funds agree

17


Ceres Tactical Commodity L.P.

Notes to receive or deliver a fixed quantity of foreign currency for an agreed-upon price on an agreed-upon future date. Forward foreign currency contracts are valued daily, and the Partnership’s and the Funds’ net equity therein, representing unrealized gain or loss on the contracts as measured by the difference between the forward foreign exchange rates at the dates of entry into the contracts and the forward rates at the reporting date, is included in the Partnership’s/Funds’Financial Statements of Financial Condition. Net realized gains (losses) and net change in unrealized gains (losses) on forward foreign currency contracts are recognized in the period in which the contract is closed or the changes occur, respectively, and are included in the Partnership’s/Funds’ Statements of Income and Expenses.

(Unaudited)

London Metals Exchange Forward Contracts.Metal contracts traded on the London Metals Exchange (“LME”) represent a firm commitment to buy or sell a specified quantity of aluminum, copper, lead, nickel, tin or zinc. LME contracts traded by the Partnership and the Funds are cash settled based on prompt dates published by the LME. Variation margin may be made or received by the Partnership and the Funds each business day, depending on the daily fluctuations in the value of the underlying contracts, and are recorded as unrealized gains or losses by the Partnership and the Funds. A contract is considered offset when all long positions have been matched with a like number of short positions settling on the same prompt date. When the contract is closed at the prompt date, the Partnership and the Funds record a realized gain or loss equal to the difference between the value of the contract at the time it was opened and the value at the time it was closed. Transactions in LME contracts require participants to make both initial margin deposits of cash or other assets and variation margin deposits, through the broker, directly with the LME. Net realized gains (losses) and net change in unrealized gains (losses) on metal contracts are included in the Partnership’s/Funds’ Statements of Income and Expenses.

16


Ceres Tactical Commodity L.P.

Notes to Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

Options. The Partnership and the Funds may purchase and write (sell) both exchange-listed and OTC options on commodities or financial instruments. An option is a contract allowing, but not requiring, its holder to buy (call) or sell (put) a specific or standard commodity or financial instrument at a specified price during a specified time period. The option premium is the total price paid or received for the option contract. When the Partnership/Funds write an option, the premium received is recorded as a liability in the Partnership’s/Funds’ Statements of Financial Condition andmarked-to-market daily. When the Partnership/Funds purchase an option, the premium paid is recorded as an asset in the Partnership’s/Funds’ Statements of Financial Condition andmarked-to-market daily. Net realized gains (losses) and net change in unrealized gains (losses) on option contracts are included in the Partnership’s/Funds’ Statements of Income and Expenses.

As both a buyer and seller of options, the Partnership/Funds pay or receive a premium at the outset and then bear the risk of unfavorable changes in the price of the contract underlying the option. Written options expose the Partnership/Funds to potentially unlimited liability; for purchased options, the risk of loss is limited to the premiums paid. Certain written put options permit cash settlement and do not require the option holder to own the reference asset. The Partnership/Funds do not consider these contracts to be guarantees.

Futures-style options.Futures-Style Options. The Partnership/Partnership and the Funds may trade futures-style option contracts. Unlike traditional option contracts, the premiums for futures-style option contracts are not received or paid upon the onset of the trade. The premiums are recognized and received or paid as part of the sales price when the contract is closed. Similar to a futures contract, variation margin for the futures-style option contract may be made or received by the Partnership/Funds each business day, depending on the daily fluctuations in the value of the underlying contracts, and are recorded as unrealized gains or losses by the Partnership/Funds. Transactions in futures-style option contracts require participants to make both initial margin deposits of cash or other assets and variation margin deposits, through the futures broker, directly with the exchange on which the contracts are traded. Futures-style option contracts are presented as part of “Net unrealized appreciation on open futures contracts” or “Net unrealized depreciation on open futures contracts,” as applicable, in the Partnership’s/Funds’ Statements of Financial Condition. Net realized gains (losses) and net change in unrealized gains (losses) on futures-style option contracts are included in the Partnership’s/Funds’ Statements of Income and Expenses.

Market risk is the potential for changes in the value of the financial instruments traded by the Partnership/Funds due to market changes, including interest and foreign exchange rate movements and fluctuations in commodity or security prices. Market risk is directly impacted by the volatility and liquidity in the markets in which the related underlying assets are traded. The Partnership and the Funds are exposed to market risk equal to the value of the futures and forward contracts held and unlimited liability on such contracts sold short.

Credit risk is the possibility that a loss may occur due to the failure of a counterparty to perform according to the terms of a contract. The Partnership’s/Funds’ risk of loss in the event of a counterparty default is typically limited to the amounts recognized in the Statements of Financial Condition and is not represented by the contract or notional amounts of the instruments. The Partnership’s/Funds’ risk of loss is reduced through the use of legally enforceable master netting agreements with counterparties that permit the Partnership/Funds to offset unrealized gains and losses and other assets and liabilities with such counterparties upon the occurrence of certain events. The Partnership/Funds have credit risk and concentration risk, as MS&Co., or an MS&Co. affiliate or JPMorgan are counterparties or brokers with respect to the Partnership’s/Funds’ assets. Credit risk with respect toexchange-traded instruments is reduced to the extent that, through MS&Co. or an MS&Co. affiliate, the Partnership’s/Funds’ counterparty is an exchange or clearing organization.

18


Ceres Tactical Commodity L.P.

Notes to Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

The General Partner monitors and attempts to mitigate the Partnership’s/Funds’ risk exposure on a daily basis through financial, credit and risk management monitoring systems and, accordingly, believes that it has effective procedures for evaluating and limiting the credit and market risks to which the Partnership/Funds may be subject. These monitoring systems generally allow the General Partner to statistically analyze actual trading results withrisk-adjusted performance indicators and correlation statistics. In addition, online monitoring systems provide account analysis of futures, forward and option contracts by sector, margin requirements, gain and loss transactions and collateral positions.

The majority of these financial instruments mature within one year of the inception date. However, due to the nature of the Partnership’s/Funds’ business, these instruments may not be held to maturity.

17


Ceres Tactical Commodity L.P.

Notes to Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

The risk to the limited partners that have purchased Redeemable Units is limited to the amount of their share of the Partnership’s net assets and undistributed profits. This limited liability is a result of the organization of the Partnership as a limited partnership under New York law.

In the ordinary course of business, the Partnership/Funds enter into contracts and agreements that contain various representations and warranties and which provide general indemnifications. The Partnership’s/Funds’ maximum exposure under these arrangements cannot be determined, as this could include future claims that have not yet been made against the Partnership/Funds. The Partnership/Funds consider the risk of any future obligation relating to these indemnifications to be remote.

 

8.

Subsequent Events:

The General Partner evaluates events that occur after the balance sheet date but before and up until financial statements are available to be issued. The General Partner has assessed the subsequent events through the date the financial statements were issued and has determined that, other than disclosed below, there were no subsequent events requiring adjustment to or disclosure in the financial statements.

Class D Redeemable Units were first issued on JulyOn April 1, 2018.2019, the Partnership allocated a portion of its assets to Northlander Commodity Advisors LLP (“Northlander”), which is invested in CMF NL Master Fund LLC and is traded by Northlander pursuant to Northlander’s Commodity Program.

 

18

19


Item 2.  Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

The Partnership does not have, nor does it expect to have, any capital assets. The Partnership does not engage in sales of goods or services. Its assets are its (i) investment in the Funds,Fund, (ii) redemptions receivable from the Funds,Fund, (iii) equity in the trading account, consisting of unrestricted cash, restricted cash, net unrealized appreciation on open futures contracts, net unrealized appreciation on open forward contracts and options purchased at fair value, if applicable, (iv) cash at bank and (v)(iv) interest receivable. Because of the low margin deposits normally required in commodity futures trading, relatively small price movements may result in substantial losses to the Partnership, through its direct investmentinvestments and investment in the Funds.Fund. While substantial losses could lead to a material decrease in liquidity, no such illiquidity occurred in the secondfirst quarter of 2018.2019.

The Partnership’s/Funds’ investment in futures, forwards and options may, from time to time, be illiquid. Most U.S. futures exchanges limit fluctuations in prices during a single day by regulations referred to as “daily price fluctuation limits” or “daily limits.” Trades may not be executed at prices beyond the daily limit. If the price for a particular futures or option contract has increased or decreased by an amount equal to the daily limit, positions in that futures or option contract can neither be taken nor liquidated unless traders are willing to effect trades at or within the limit. Futures prices have occasionally moved the daily limit for several consecutive days with little or no trading. These market conditions could prevent the Partnership’s/Funds’Partnership/Funds from promptly liquidating itstheir futures or option contracts and result in restrictions on redemptions.

There is no limitation on daily price movements in trading forward contracts on foreign currencies. The markets for some world currencies have low trading volume and are illiquid, which may prevent the Partnership from promptly liquidating unfavorable positions in such markets, subjecting it to substantial losses. Either of these market conditions could result in restrictions on redemptions. For the periods covered by this report, illiquidity has not materially affected the Partnership’s assets.

Other than the risks inherent in commodity futures, forward,forwards, options and swaps and other derivatives trading, and U.S. Treasury bills and money market mutual fund securities, the Partnership and the Funds knowGeneral Partner knows of no trends, demands, commitments, events or uncertainties at the present time thatwhich will result in or which are reasonably likely to result in the Partnership’s or the Partnership’s/Funds’ liquidity increasing or decreasing in any material way.

The Partnership’s capital consists of the capital contributions of the partners, as increased or decreased by net realized and/or unrealized gains orand losses on trading and by expenses, interest income, subscriptions and redemptions of Redeemable Units and distributions of profits, if any.

For the sixthree months ended June 30, 2018,March 31, 2019, Partnership capital decreased 8.1%increased 88.0% from $69,715,774$58,218,866 to $64,047,916.$109,451,015. This decreaseincrease was attributable to redemptionssubscriptions of 50.929039,246.7420 Class A limited partner Redeemable Units totaling $51,042,913, subscriptions of 99.2020 Class Z limited partner Redeemable Units totaling $100,000, subscriptions of 671.4640 Class Z General Partner Redeemable Units totaling $50,000$680,750 and net income of $3,209,497 which was partially offset by redemptions of 6,811.97302,893.4220 Class A limited partner Redeemable Units totaling $8,758,018 which was partially offset by net income of $1,575,160 and subscriptions of 1,218.5560 Class A limited partner Redeemable Units totaling $1,565,000.$3,801,011. Future redemptions can impact the amount of funds available for direct investments and investment in the Funds in subsequent periods.

Other than as discussed above, there are no known material trends, favorable or unfavorable, that would affect, nor any expected material changes to, the Partnership’s or the Funds’ capital resource arrangements at the present time.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements and Contractual Obligations

The Partnership does not have anyoff-balance sheet arrangements, nor does it have contractual obligations or commercial commitments to make future payments, that would affect its liquidity or capital resources.

20


Critical Accounting Policies

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires the General Partner to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of income and expense during the reporting period. The General Partner believes that the estimates and assumptions utilized in preparing the financial statements are reasonable. ActualAs a result, actual results could differ from those estimates. TheA summary of the Partnership’s significant accounting policies areis described in detail in Note 2, “Basis of Presentation and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies,” of the Financial Statements.

19


The Partnership/Funds record all investments at fair value in itstheir respective financial statements, with changes in fair value reported as a component of net realized gains (losses) and net change in unrealized gains (losses) in the respective Statements of Income and Expenses.

Results of Operations

During the Partnership’s secondfirst quarter of 2018,2019, the net asset value per Redeemable Unit for Class A increased 1.3%3.0% from $1,278.81$1,300.66 to $1,295.03$1,339.30 as compared to a decreasean increase of 2.5%1.0% in the secondfirst quarter of 2017.2018. During the Partnership’s secondfirst quarter of 2018,2019, the net asset value per Redeemable Unit for Class D increased 3.3% from $1,010.75 to $1,044.06. During the Partnership’s first quarter of 2019, the net asset value per Redeemable Unit for Class Z increased 1.8%3.5% from $981.75$1,013.83 to $999.24$1,049.22 as compared to a decreasean increase of 2.0%1.6% in the secondfirst quarter of 2017.2018. The Partnership/FundsPartnership experienced a net trading gain before fees and expenses during the secondfirst quarter of 20182019 of $2,024,781.$4,633,549. Gains were primarily attributable to the Partnership’s/Funds’ trading of commodity futures in energy, livestock, metals and softs and were partially offset by losses in currencies and grains. The Partnership, through its investment in MB Master, experienced a net trading loss before fees and expenses in the second quarter of 2017 of $978,320. Losses were primarily attributable to MB Master’s trading of commodity futures in currencies, energy, grains, livestock and metals and were partially offset by gainslosses in softs. The Partnership experienced a net trading gain before fees and expenses during the first quarter of 2018 of $1,632,652. Gains were primarily attributable to the Partnership’s/Funds’ trading of commodity futures in currencies, energy, grains and livestock and were partially offset by losses in metals and softs.

TheDuring the first quarter, the most notable gains were recorded during February and March from long futures positions in Brent crude oil and oil distillates as prices advanced amid signs of tightening global crude supply and strong U.S. demand for distillate products. In the livestock markets, gains were achieved during February and March from long positions in lean hog futures as prices increased amid a rise in U.S. exports as the African swine virus diminished global supplies. Gains within the metals complex were experienced during January and February from long positions in industrial metals futures as prices rebounded amid a decrease in the relative value of the U.S. dollar and optimism of U.S. trade negotiations with China. In the grains sector, smaller gains were achieved throughout the quarter from long positions in crude oilcorn and its related products as prices advanced due to tensions in the Middle East and expectations of constrained supplies. In the soft commodities markets, gains were achieved primarily from short positions in cocoa futures as prices fell dramatically amid weakening demand and growing global supplies. Gains were also recorded within the metals complex primarily during April from long positions in palladium and aluminum as prices soared amid the possibility of sanctions against Russian metals exports. Smaller gains were experienced in livestock futures and options trading during May and June.wheat. The Partnership’s overall trading gains for the quarter were partially offset by trading losses within the soft commodities sector primarily during June from long grain positions as prices fell amid favorable growing conditions within the U.S. and after China announced plans to levy tariffs on U.S. agricultural products.

During the Partnership’s six months ended June 30, 2018, the net asset value per Redeemable Unit for Class A increased 2.3% from $1,265.64 to $1,295.03 as compared to a decrease of 4.7% during the six months ended June 30, 2017. During the Partnership’s six months ended June 30, 2018, the net asset value per Redeemable Unit for Class Z increased 3.4% from $966.76 to $999.24 as compared to a decrease of 3.8% during the six months ended June 30, 2017. The Partnership experienced a net trading gain before fees and expenses for the six months ended June 30, 2018 of $3,657,433. Gains were primarily attributable to the Partnership’s/Funds’ trading of commodity futures in energy, livestock, metals and softs and were partially offset by losses in currencies and grains. The Partnership, through its investment in MB Master, experienced a net trading loss before fees and expenses for the six months ended June 30, 2017 of $2,010,859. Losses were primarily attributable to MB Master’s trading of commodity futures in currencies, energy, livestock and softs and were partially offset by gains in grains and metals.

The most notable gains were recorded during much of the first half of the yearMarch from long positions in crude oil and its related products as prices advanced due to tensions in the Middle East and supply concerns. Further gains were also achieved from long positions in natural gas futures. Within the livestock markets, gains were experienced during March from short positions in live cattle as prices declined amid reduced demand. Gains were also recorded within the metals complex during February, April, and May from positions in gold, silver, aluminum, and palladium. Additional gains were achieved in the soft commodities markets, though a portion of these gains was offset by currency hedges. The Partnership’s overall trading gains for the first six months of the year were partially offset by trading losses primarily during June from long graincoffee futures positions as prices fell amid favorable growing conditions within the U.S. and after China announced plansdecreased due to levy tariffs on U.S. agricultural products.ample supplies.

 

20

21


Commodity markets are highly volatile. Broad price fluctuations and rapid inflation increase not only the risks involved in commodity trading, but also the possibility of profit. The profitability of the Partnership/Funds depends on the existence of major price trends and the ability of the Advisors to correctly identify those price trends. Price trends are influenced by, among other factors, changing supply and demand relationships, weather, governmental, agricultural, commercial and trade programs and policies, national and international political and economic events and changes in interest rates. To the extent that market trends exist and the Advisors are able to identify them, the Partnership/Funds expect to increase capital through operations.

Interest income on 100% of the average daily equity maintained in cash in the Partnership’s (or the Partnership’s allocable portion of the Funds’) brokerage account during each month is earned at a rate equal to the monthly average of the4-week U.S. Treasury bill discount rate. Prior to November 1, 2016, MS&Co. paid the Partnership interest on 80% of the average daily equity maintained in cash in the Partnership’s (or the Partnership’s allocable portion of the Funds’) brokerage account at the rate equal to the monthly average of the4-week U.S. Treasury bill discount rate. For the avoidance of doubt, the Partnership/Funds will not receive interest on amounts in the futures brokerage account that are committed to margin. Any interest earned on the Partnership’s and/or the Fund’sFunds’ account in excess of the amounts described above, if any, will be retained by MS&Co. and/or shared with the General Partner. All interest income earned on U.S. Treasury bills and money market mutual fund securities will be retained by the Partnership and/or the Fund,Funds, as applicable. Interest income earned for the three and six months ended June 30, 2018March 31, 2019 increased by $89,249 and $185,497, respectively,$361,070 as compared to the corresponding periodsperiod in 2017.2018. The increase in interest income was primarily due to higher average daily equity and higher interest rates during the three and six months ended June 30, 2018March 31, 2019 as compared to the corresponding periodsperiod in 2017.2018. Interest earned by the Partnership will increase the net asset value of the Partnership. The amount of interest income earned by the Partnership depends on (1) the average daily equity maintained in cash in the Partnership’s and/or the applicable Funds’ accounts, (2) the amount of U.S. Treasury bills and/or money market mutual fund securities held by the Partnership and/or the Funds and (3) interest rates over which none of the Partnership, the Funds or MS&Co. has control.

Certain clearing fees are based on the number of trades executed by the Advisors for the Partnership/Funds. Accordingly, they must be compared in relation to the number of trades executed during the period. Clearing fees related to direct investments for the three and six months ended June 30, 2018March 31, 2019 increased by $201,281 as compared to the corresponding period in 2018. The increase in these clearing fees was $141,217 and $275,664, respectively. Theprimarily due to an increase in the number of direct trades made by the Partnership did not trade directly during the three and six months ended June 30, 2017.March 31, 2019 as compared to the corresponding period in 2018.

Ongoing selling agent fees are calculated as a percentage of the Partnership’s adjusted net asset value of Class A Redeemable Units, Class D Redeemable Units as of the end of each month and are affected by trading performance, subscriptions and redemptions. Accordingly, they must be analyzed in relation to the fluctuations in the monthly net asset values. Ongoing selling agent fees for the three and six months ended June 30, 2018 decreasedMarch 31, 2019 increased by $148,362 and $341,910, respectively,$202,659 as compared to the corresponding periodsperiod in 2017.2018. This decreaseincrease was due to lowerhigher average net assets attributable to Class A Redeemable Units and Class D Redeemable Units during the three and six months ended June 30, 2018March 31, 2019 as compared to the corresponding periodsperiod in 2017.2018.

Management fees are calculated as a percentage of the Partnership’s adjusted net assets per Class as of the end of each month and are affected by trading performance, subscriptions and redemptions. Accordingly, they must be analyzed in relation to the fluctuations in the monthly net asset values. Management fees for the three and six months ended June 30, 2018 decreasedMarch 31, 2019 increased by $45,168 and $121,468, respectively,$144,505 as compared to the corresponding periodsperiod in 2017.2018. This decreaseincrease was due to lowerhigher average net assets per Class during the three and six months ended June 30, 2018March 31, 2019 as compared to the corresponding periodsperiod in 2017.2018.

General Partner fees are paid to the General Partner for administering the business and affairs of the Partnership including, among other factorsthings, (i) selecting, appointing and terminating the Partnership’s commodity trading advisors, (ii) allocating and (ii)reallocating the Partnership’s assets among the commodity trading advisors and (iii) monitoring the activities of the commodity trading advisors. These fees are calculated as a percentage of the Partnership’s adjusted net assets per Class as of the end of each month and are affected by trading performance, subscriptions and redemptions. Accordingly, they must be analyzed in relation to the fluctuations in the monthly net asset values. General Partner fees for the three and six months ended June 30, 2018 decreasedMarch 31, 2019 increased by $75,095 and $172,887, respectively,$35,134 as compared to the corresponding periodsperiod in 2017.2018. This decreaseincrease was due to lowerhigher average net assets per Class during the three and six months ended June 30, 2018March 31, 2019 as compared to the corresponding periodsperiod in 2017.2018.

 

21

22


Incentive fees are based on the newnet trading profits (as defined in the respective management agreements between the Partnership, the General Partner and each Advisor) generated by each Advisor at the end of each quarter, half year or year, as applicable. Trading performance for the three and six months ended June 30,March 31, 2019 and 2018 resulted in incentive fees of $341,419$371,860 and $415,320,$73,901, respectively. There was no trading performance for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017. To the extent an Advisor incurs a loss for the Partnership, the Advisor will not be paid incentive fees until such Advisor recovers theany net loss incurred and earns additional new trading profits for the Partnership.

In allocating substantially all of the assets of the Partnership among the Advisors, the General Partner considers, among other factors, the Advisors’ past performance, trading style, volatility of markets traded and fee requirements. The General Partner may modify or terminate the allocation of assets to an Advisorthe Advisors and allocate assets to additional advisors at any time.

As of June 30, 2018March 31, 2019 and MarchDecember 31, 2018, the Partnership’s assets were allocated among the trading Advisors in the following approximate percentages:

 

                                                                                    
    June 30, 2018   March 31, 2018     March 31, 2019    December 31, 2018
    (percentage of   (percentage of     (percentage of    (percentage of

Advisor

      June 30, 2018       Partners’ Capital)       March 31, 2018       Partners’ Capital)        March 31, 2019*          Partners’ Capital)         December 31, 2018          Partners’ Capital)    

Aventis

    $        8,302,751                    13   $        8,731,488                    13

Harbour Square

   15,422,221                    24 17,183,754                    26    $3,786,545    3 $5,489,732    9

Millburn

   20,903,967                    33 20,119,789                    31   23,405,911    21  23,567,218    41

Ospraie

   19,418,977                      30 19,943,687                      30   29,668,813    27  20,399,917    35

Aquantum

   26,820,072    25  8,761,999    15

Pan

   25,769,674    24  -        -  

*

Allocation presented is prior to Harbour Square’s termination effective the close of business on March 31, 2019.

 

22

23


Item 3.Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk.

The Partnership/Funds are speculative commodity pools. The market sensitive instruments held by the Partnership/Funds are acquired for speculative trading purposes, and all or substantially all of the Partnership’s/Funds’ assets are subject to the risk of trading loss. Unlike an operating company, the risk of market sensitive instruments is integral, not incidental, to the Partnership’s/Funds’ main line of business.

The limited partners will not be liable for losses exceeding the current net asset value of their investment.

Market movements result in frequent changes in the fair value of the Partnership’s/Funds’ open positions and, consequently, in their earnings and cash balances. The Partnership’s/Funds’ market risk is influenced by a wide variety of factors, including the level and volatility of interest rates, exchange rates, equity price levels, the market value of financial instruments and contracts, the diversification effects among the Partnership’s/Funds’ open positions and the liquidity of the markets in which they trade.

The Partnership/Funds rapidly acquire and liquidate both long and short positions in a wide range of different markets. Consequently, it is not possible to predict how a particular future market scenario will affect performance, and the Partnership’s/Funds’ past performance is not necessarily indicative of its future results.

Quantifying the Partnership’s and the Funds’ Trading Value at Risk

The following quantitative disclosures regarding the Partnership’s/Funds’ market risk exposures contain “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the safe harbor from civil liability provided for such statements by the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (set forth in Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”)). All quantitative disclosures in this section are deemed to be forward-looking statements for purposes of the safe harbor, except for statements of historical fact.

The Partnership/Funds account for open positions on the basis of fair value accounting principles. Any loss in the market value of the Partnership’s/Funds’ open positions is directly reflected in the Partnership’s/Funds’ earnings and cash flow.

The Partnership’s/Funds’ risk exposure in the market sectors traded by the Advisors is estimated below in terms of Value at Risk. Please note that the Value at Risk model is used to numerically quantify market risk for historic reporting purposes only and is not utilized by either the General Partner or the Advisors in their daily risk management activities.

“Value at Risk” is a measure of the maximum amount which the Partnership/Funds could reasonably be expected to lose in a given market sector. However, the inherent uncertainty of the Partnership’s/Funds’ speculative trading and the recurrence in the markets traded by the Partnership/Funds of market movements far exceeding expectations could result in actual trading ornon-trading losses far beyond the indicated Value at Risk or the Partnership’s/Funds’ experience to date (i.e., “risk of ruin”). In light of the foregoing, as well as the risks and uncertainties intrinsic to all future projections, the inclusion of the quantification in this section should not be considered to constitute any assurance or representation that the Partnership’s/Funds’ losses in any market sector will be limited to Value at Risk or by the Partnership’s/Funds’ attempts to manage itstheir market risk.

Exchange margin requirements have been used by the Partnership/Funds as the measure of its Value at Risk. Margin requirements are set by exchanges to equal or exceed the maximum losses reasonably expected to be incurred in the fair value of any given contract in95%-99% of anyone-day interval. The margin levels are established by dealers and exchanges using historical price studies as well as an assessment of current market volatility (including the implied volatility of the options on a given futures contract) and economic fundamentals to provide a probabilistic estimate of the maximum expected near-termone-day price fluctuation.

23


Value at Risk tables represent a probabilistic assessment of the risk of loss in market sensitive instruments. The Advisors, with the exception of Millburn and Ospraie, currently tradeHarbour Square traded the Partnership’s assets indirectly in a master fund managed accountsaccount established in the name of the master fundsfund over which they haveit had been granted limited authority to make trading decisions. The Partnership fully redeemed its investment in Harbour Square Master effective March 31, 2019. Additionally, Harbour Square Master did not have any open positions as of December 31, 2018. Millburn, Ospraie, Aquantum and OspraiePan directly trade a managed accountaccounts in the name of the Partnership. The first twoAs a result, the trading Value at Risk tables reflectpresented only reflects the market sensitive instruments held by the Partnership directly as of March 31, 2019 and through its investment in the Funds. The remaining trading Value at Risk tables reflect the market sensitive instruments held by the Partnership directly (i.e. the managed accounts in the Partnership’s name traded by Millburn and Ospraie) and indirectly by each Fund separately.December 31, 2018. There have been no material changes in the trading Value at Risk information previously disclosed in the Partnership’s Annual Report on Form10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017.2018.

The following table indicates the trading Value at Risk associated with the Partnership’s open positions by market category as of June 30, 2018. As of June 30, 2018, the Partnership’s total capitalization was $64,047,916.

 

  

June 30, 2018

    
          % of Total 

Market Sector

       Value at Risk      Capitalization  

Commodities

      $      5,225,749     8.16  % 

Currencies

     59,289     0.09  
    

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

      $      5,285,038     8.25  % 
    

 

 

   

 

 

 

As of December 31, 2017, the Partnership’s only investment was its investment in MB Master.24


The following tables indicate the trading Value at Risk associated with the Partnership’s direct investments and indirect investment in the Funds by market category as of June 30, 2018March 31, 2019 and prior to the close of business on December 31, 2017,2018, and the highest, lowest and average values during the three months ended June 30, 2018March 31, 2019 and the twelve months ended December 31, 2017.2018. All open contracts trading risk exposures have been included in calculating the figures set forth below. As of March 31, 2019, the Partnership’s total capitalization was $109,451,015.

As of June 30, 2018,March 31, 2019, the Partnership’s Value at Risk for the portion of its assets that are traded directly was as follows:

 

                                                                                                                                       

March 31, 2019

March 31, 2019

 
       Three Months Ended March 31, 2019
      June 30, 2018                % of Total High  Low  Average

Market Sector

      Value at Risk          Capitalization         Value at Risk          Value at Risk          Value at Risk*    

Energy

  $3,057,480    2.79   %    $6,862,028     $3,057,480     $4,978,972 

Grains

   463,886    0.42     574,865    248,768    423,235 

Livestock

   189,980    0.17     2,177,333    189,980    1,216,017 

Metals

   1,117,626    1.02     2,108,797    633,112    1,530,793 

Softs

   1,219,591    1.11     1,471,368    748,884    1,171,675 
  

 

  

 

      

Total

    $6,048,563    5.51   %      
  

 

  

 

      

* Average of daily Values at Risk.

As of December 31, 2018, the Partnership’s Value at Risk for the portion of its assets that are traded directly was as follows:

* Average of daily Values at Risk.

As of December 31, 2018, the Partnership’s Value at Risk for the portion of its assets that are traded directly was as follows:

 

 

December 31, 2018December 31, 2018 
        Three Months Ended June 30, 2018        Twelve Months Ended December 31, 2018
      % of Total High   Low   Average      % of Total High  Low  Average

Market Sector

    Value at Risk       Capitalization     Value at Risk         Value at Risk         Value at Risk*     Value at Risk  Capitalization Value at Risk  Value at Risk  Value at Risk*

Currencies

    $55,440     0.09  %    $112,860     $55,440     $87,120     $92,400    0.16   %    $112,860     $-         $50,959 

Energy

   986,235     1.54   1,371,808    694,159    1,053,954    3,193,250    5.48     3,193,250    -        1,285,758 

Grains

   1,487,022     2.32   1,663,797    180,847    717,870    420,242    0.72     1,663,797    -        555,538 

Livestock

   57,585     0.09   300,800    17,875    64,309    699,318    1.20     699,318    -        161,965 

Metals

   1,631,605     2.55   3,546,300    1,105,824    2,047,533    1,616,158    2.78     3,546,300    -        1,831,200 

Softs

   581,152     0.91   1,614,949    581,152    1,000,989    1,061,055    1.82     1,614,949    -        749,472 
  

 

   

 

        

 

  

 

      

Total

    $    4,799,039     7.50  %          $7,082,423    12.16   %      
  

 

   

 

        

 

  

 

      

*    Annual average ofmonth-end Values at Risk.

*

Average ofmonth-end Values at Risk.

TheAs of March 31, 2019, the Partnership did not trade directly asfully redeemed its investment in Harbour Square Master. As of December 31, 2017.

24


As of June 30, 2018, MB Master’s total capitalization was $17,006,793, and the Partnership owned approximately 48.6% of MB Master. As of June 30, 2018, MB Master’s Value at Risk for its assets (including the portion of the Partnership’s assets allocated to MB Master for trading) was as follows:

       June 30, 2018            
          Three Months Ended June 30, 2018 
       % of Total  High   Low   Average 

Market Sector

   Value at Risk     Capitalization    Value at Risk     Value at Risk     Value at Risk*  

 Currencies

    $7,920      0.05   %    $              62,766       $        -           $        5,280   

 Energy

   43,028      0.25    415,190      7,744      111,391   

 Grains

   450,283      2.65    450,283      20,291      300,389   

 Livestock

   112,472      0.66    237,001      -          45,013   

 Softs

   124,743      0.73    424,037      14,233      83,952   
  

 

 

   

 

 

      

 Total

    $        738,446      4.34   %      
  

 

 

   

 

 

      

*

Average ofmonth-end Values at Risk.

Prior to the close of business on December 31, 2017, MB Master’s total capitalization was $86,775,202, and the Partnership owned approximately 89.3% of MB Master. The Partnership invested substantially all of its assets in MB Master. MB Master’s Value at Risk as of December 31, 2017 was as follows:

       December 31, 2017            
          Twelve Months Ended December 31, 2017 
       % of Total  High   Low   Average 

Market Sector

   Value at Risk     Capitalization    Value at Risk     Value at Risk     Value at Risk*  

 Energy

    $79,508      0.09   %    $    5,489,054       $      -           $      1,623,836   

 Grains

   416,089      0.48     3,480,889      56,160      865,520   

 Livestock

   37,274      0.04     1,531,671      -          391,711   

 Softs

   167,196      0.19     1,670,447      66,475      842,334   
  

 

 

   

 

 

      

 Total

    $    700,067      0.80   %      
  

 

 

   

 

 

      

*

Annual average of month-end Values at Risk.

As of June 30, 2018, Harbour Square Master’s total capitalization was $26,594,262,$7,972,677, and the Partnership owned approximately 57.9%68.7% of Harbour Square Master. As of June 30,December 31, 2018, Harbour Square Master’sMaster had no Value at Risk for its assets (including the portion of the Partnership’s assets allocated to Harbour Square Master for trading) was as follows:.

       June 30, 2018            
          Three Months Ended June 30, 2018 
       % of Total  High   Low   Average 

Market Sector

   Value at Risk     Capitalization    Value at Risk     Value at Risk     Value at Risk*  

 Energy

    $            219,542      0.83     $              659,835       $            -           $        324,396   
  

 

 

   

 

 

      

 Total

    $219,542      0.83   %      
  

 

 

   

 

 

      

*

Average ofmonth-end Values at Risk.

The Partnership was not invested in Harbour Square Master as of December 31, 2017.

 

25


Item 4.Controls and Procedures.

The Partnership’s disclosure controls and procedures are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Partnership on the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods expected in the SEC’s rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Partnership in the reports it files is accumulated and communicated to management, including the President and Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”) of the General Partner, to allow for timely decisions regarding required disclosure and appropriate SEC filings.

The General Partner is responsible for ensuring that there is an adequate and effective process for establishing, maintaining and evaluating disclosure controls and procedures for the Partnership’s external disclosures.

The General Partner’s President and CFO have evaluated the effectiveness of the Partnership’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules13a-15(e) and15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act) as of June 30, 2018March 31, 2019 and, based on that evaluation, the General Partner’s President and CFO have concluded that, at that date, the Partnership’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective.

The Partnership’sinternal control over financial reportingis a process under the supervision of the General Partner’s President and CFO to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements in accordance with GAAP. These controls include policies and procedures that:

 

pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the Partnership;

 

provide reasonable assurance that (i) transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with GAAP and (ii) the Partnership’s receipts are handled and expenditures are made only pursuant to authorizations of the General Partner; and

 

provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection and correction of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the Partnership’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

There were no changes in the Partnership’s internal control over financial reporting process during the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2018March 31, 2019, that materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Partnership’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

26


PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1.Legal Proceedings.

This section describes the major pending legal proceedings, other than ordinary routine litigation incidental to the business, to which MS&Co. or its subsidiaries is a party or to which any of their property is subject. There are no material legal proceedings pending against the Partnership or the General Partner.

On June 1, 2011, Morgan Stanley & Co. Incorporated converted from a Delaware corporation to a Delaware limited liability company. As a result of that conversion, Morgan Stanley & Co. Incorporated is now named Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC (“MS&Co.”).

MS&Co. is a wholly-owned, indirect subsidiary of Morgan Stanley, a Delaware holding company. Morgan Stanley files periodic reports with the SEC as required by the Exchange Act, which include current descriptions of material litigation and material proceedings and investigations, if any, by governmental and/or regulatory agencies orself-regulatory organizations concerning Morgan Stanley and its subsidiaries, including MS&Co. As a consolidated subsidiary of Morgan Stanley, MS&Co. does not file its own periodic reports with the SEC that contain descriptions of material litigation, proceedings and investigations. As a result, please refer to the “Legal Proceedings” section of Morgan Stanley’s SEC10-K filings for 2018, 2017, 2016, 2015 2014, and 2013.2014. In addition, MS&Co. annually prepares an Audited, Consolidated Statement of Financial Condition (“Audited Financial Statement”) that is publicly available on Morgan Stanley’s website atwww.morganstanley.com. Please refer to the Commitments, Guarantees and Contingencies – Legal section of MS&Co.’s 20172018 Audited Financial.Financial Statement.

In addition to the matters described in those filings, in the normal course of business, each of Morgan Stanley and MS&Co. has been named, from time to time, as a defendant in various legal actions, including arbitrations, class actions, and other litigation, arising in connection with its activities as a global diversified financial services institution. Certain of the legal actions include claims for substantial compensatory and/or punitive damages or claims for indeterminate amounts of damages. Each of Morgan Stanley and MS&Co. is also involved, from time to time, in investigations and proceedings by governmental and/or regulatory agencies or self-regulatory organizations, certain of which may result in adverse judgments, fines or penalties. The number of these investigations and proceedings has increased in recent years with regard to many financial services institutions, including Morgan Stanley and MS&Co.

MS&Co. is a Delaware limited liability company with its main business office located at 1585 Broadway, New York, New York 10036. Among other registrations and memberships, MS&Co. is registered as a futures commission merchant and is a member of the National Futures Association.

Regulatory and Governmental Matters.

On February 25, 2015, MS&Co. reached an agreement in principle with the United States Department of Justice, Civil Division and the United States Attorney’s Office for the Northern District of California, Civil Division (collectively, the “Civil Division”) to pay $2.6 billion to resolve certain claims that the Civil Division indicated it intended to bring against MS&Co. That settlement was finalized on February 10, 2016.

In October 2014, the Illinois Attorney General’s Office (“ILAG”) sent a letter to MS&Co. alleging that MS&Co. knowingly made misrepresentations related to RMBS purchased by certain pension funds affiliated with the State of Illinois and demanding that MS&Co. pay

27


ILAG approximately $88 million. MS&Co. and ILAG reached an agreement to resolve the matter on February 10, 2016.

On January 13, 2015, the New York Attorney General’s Office (“NYAG”), which is also a member of the RMBS Working Group, indicated that it intended to file a lawsuit related to approximately 30 subprime securitizations sponsored by MS&Co. NYAG indicated that the lawsuit would allege that MS&Co. misrepresented or omitted material information related to the due diligence, underwriting and valuation of the loans in the

27


securitizations and the properties securing them and indicated that its lawsuit would be brought under the Martin Act. MS&Co. and NYAG reached an agreement to resolve the matter on February 10, 2016.

On June 5, 2012, MS&Co. consented to and became the subject of an Order Instituting Proceedings Pursuant to Sections 6(c) and 6(d) of the Commodity Exchange Act, as amended, Making Findings and Imposing Remedial Sanctions by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (“CFTC”) to resolve allegations related to the failure of a salesperson to comply with exchange rules that prohibitoff-exchange futures transactions unless there is an Exchange for Related Position (“EFRP”). Specifically, the CFTC found that from April 2008 through October 2009, MS&Co. violated Section 4c(a) of the Commodity Exchange Act and CFTC Regulation 1.38 by executing, processing and reporting numerousoff-exchange futures trades to the Chicago Mercantile Exchange (“CME”) and Chicago Board of Trade (“CBOT”) as EFRPs in violation of CME and CBOT rules because those trades lacked the corresponding and related cash, OTC swap, OTC option, or other OTC derivative position. In addition, the CFTC found that MS&Co. violated CFTC Regulation 166.3 by failing to supervise the handling of the trades at issue and failing to have adequate policies and procedures designed to detect and deter the violations of the Commodity Exchange Act and CFTC Regulations. Without admitting or denying the underlying allegations and without adjudication of any issue of law or fact, MS&Co. accepted and consented to entry of findings and the imposition of a cease and desist order, a fine of $5,000,000, and undertakings related to public statements, cooperation and payment of the fine. MS&Co. entered into corresponding and related settlements with the CME and CBOT in which the CME found that MS&Co. violated CME Rules 432.Q and 538 and fined MS&Co. $750,000 and CBOT found that MS&Co. violated CBOT Rules 432.Q and 538 and fined MS&Co. $1,000,000.

On July 23, 2014, the SEC approved a settlement by MS&Co. and certain affiliates to resolve an investigation related to certain subprime RMBS transactions sponsored and underwritten by those entities in 2007. Pursuant to the settlement, MS&Co. and certain affiliates were charged with violating Sections 17(a)(2) and 17(a)(3) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, agreed to pay disgorgement and penalties in an amount of $275 million and neither admitted nor denied the SEC’s findings.

On April 21, 2015, the Chicago Board Options Exchange, Incorporated (“CBOE”) and the CBOE Futures Exchange, LLC (“CFE”) filed statements of charges against MS&Co. in connection with trading by one of MS&Co.’s former traders of EEM options contracts that allegedly disrupted the final settlement price of the November 2012 VXEM futures. CBOE alleged that MS&Co. violated CBOE Rules 4.1, 4.2 and 4.7, Sections 9(a) and 10(b) of the Exchange Act, and Rule10b-5 thereunder. CFE alleged that MS&Co. violated CFE Rules 608, 609 and 620. The matters were resolved on July 12, 2016 and June 28, 2016, respectively, without any findings of fraud. Pursuant to the settlements, MS&Co. was required to pay a $750,000 penalty to the CBOE (for which MS&Co. and an individual were jointly and severally liable) and a $400,000 penalty to the CFE (for which MS&Co. and an individual were jointly and severally liable) and $152,664 in disgorgement.

On June 18, 2015, MS&Co. entered into a settlement with the SEC and paid a fine of $500,000 as part of the Municipalities Continuing Disclosure Cooperation Initiative to resolve allegations that MS&Co. failed to form a reasonable basis through adequate due diligence for believing the truthfulness of the assertions by issuers and/or obligors regarding their compliance with previous continuing disclosure undertakings pursuant to Rule15c2-12 under the Exchange Act in connection with offerings in which MS&Co. acted as senior or sole underwriter.

On August 6, 2015, MS&Co. consented to and became the subject of an order by the CFTC to resolve allegations that MS&Co. violated CFTC Regulation 22.9(a) by failing to hold sufficient U.S. dollars in cleared swap segregated accounts in the United States to meet all U.S. dollar obligations to cleared swaps customers. Specifically, the CFTC found that while MS&Co. at all times held sufficient funds in segregation to cover its obligations to its customers, on certain days during 2013 and 2014, it held currencies, such as euros, instead of U.S. dollars, to meet its U.S. dollar obligations. In addition, the CFTC found that MS&Co. violated CFTC Regulation 166.3 by failing to have in place adequate procedures to ensure that it complied with CFTC Regulation 22.9(a). Without admitting or denying the findings or conclusions and without adjudication of any issue of law or fact, MS&Co. accepted and consented to the entry of findings, the imposition of a cease and desist order, a civil monetary penalty of $300,000, and undertakings related to public statements, cooperation, and payment of the monetary penalty.

 

28


On December 20, 2016, MS&Co. consented to and became the subject of an order by the SEC in connection with allegations that MS&Co. willfully violated Sections 15(c)(3) and 17(a)(1) of the Exchange Act and Rules15c3-3(e),17a-5(a), 17a-5(a), and17a-5(d) thereunder, by inaccurately calculating its Reserve Account requirement under Rule15c3-3 by including margin loans to an affiliate in its calculations, which resulted in making inaccurate records and submitting inaccurate reports to the SEC. Without admitting or denying the underlying allegations and without adjudication of any issue of law or fact, MS&Co. consented to a cease and desist order, a censure, and a civil monetary penalty of $7,500,000.

On September 28, 2017, the CFTC issued an order filing and simultaneously settling charges against MS&Co. regarding violations of CFTC Rule 166.3 by failing to diligently supervise the reconciliation of exchange and clearing fees with the amounts it ultimately charged customers for certain transactions on multiple exchanges. The order and settlement required MS&Co. to pay a $500,000 penalty and cease and desist from violating Rule 166.3.

On November 2, 2017, the CFTC issued an order filing and simultaneously settling charges against MS&Co. fornon-compliance with applicable rules governing Part 17 Large Trader reports to the CFTC. The order requires MS&Co. to pay a $350,000 penalty and cease and desist from further violations of the Commodity Exchange Act.

Civil Litigation

On July 15, 2010, China Development Industrial Bank (“CDIB”) filed a complaint against MS&Co., styledChina Development Industrial Bank v. Morgan Stanley & Co. Incorporated et alal.., which is pending in the Supreme Court of the State of New York, New York County (“Supreme Court of NY”). The complaint relates to a $275 million credit default swap referencing the super senior portion of the STACK2006-1 CDO. The complaint asserts claims for common law fraud, fraudulent inducement and fraudulent concealment and alleges that MS&Co. misrepresented the risks of the STACK2006-1 CDO to CDIB, and that MS&Co. knew that the assets backing the CDO were of poor quality when it entered into the credit default swap with CDIB. The complaint seeks compensatory damages related to the approximately $228 million that CDIB alleges it has already lost under the credit default swap, rescission of CDIB’s obligation to pay an additional $12 million, punitive damages, equitable relief, fees and costs. On February 28, 2011, the court denied MS&Co.’s motion to dismiss the complaint. On June 27, 2018, the FirmMS&Co. filed a motion for summary judgment and spoliation sanctions against CDIB. On December 21, 2018, the court denied MS&Co.’s motion for summary judgment and granted in part MS&Co.’s motion for sanctions related to the spoliation of evidence. On January 18, 2019, CDIB filed a motion to clarify and resettle the portion of the court’s December 21, 2018 order granting spoliation sanctions. On January 24, 2019, CDIB filed a notice of appeal from the court’s December 21, 2018 order, and on January 25, 2019, MS&Co. filed a notice of appeal from the same order. On March 7, 2019, the court denied the relief that CDIB sought in a motion to clarify and resettle the portion of the court’s December 21, 2018 order granting spoliation sanctions. Based on currently available information, MS&Co. believes it could incur a loss in this action of up to approximately $240 million pluspre- and post-judgment interest, fees and costs.

On October 15, 2010, the Federal Home Loan Bank of Chicago filed a complaint against MS&Co. and other defendants in the Circuit Court of the State of Illinois, styledFederal Home Loan Bank of Chicago v. Bank of America Funding Corporation et al. A corrected amended complaint was filed on April 8, 2011, which alleges that defendants made untrue statements and material omissions in the sale to plaintiff of a number of mortgage pass-through certificates backed by securitization trusts containing residential mortgage loans and asserts claims under

29


Illinois law. The total amount of certificates allegedly sold to plaintiff by MS&Co. at issue in the action was approximately $203 million. The complaint seeks, among other things, to rescind the plaintiff’s purchase of such certificates. The defendants filed a motion to dismiss the corrected amended complaint on May 27, 2011, which was denied on September 19, 2012. On December 13, 2013, the court entered an order dismissing all claims related to one of the securitizations at issue. On January 18, 2017, the court entered an order dismissing all claims related to an additional securitization at issue. After those dismissals, the remaining amount of certificates allegedly issued by MS&Co. or sold to plaintiff by MS&Co. was approximately $65 million. At JuneMarch 25, 2018,2019, the current unpaid balance of the mortgage pass-through certificates at issue in this action was approximately $37$36 million, and the certificates had not yet incurred actual losses. Based on currently available information, MS&Co. believes it could incur a loss in this action up to the difference between the $37$36 million unpaid balance of these certificates (plus any losses incurred) and their fair market value at the time of a judgment against MS&Co., pluspre- and post-judgment interest, fees and costs. MS&Co. may be entitled to be indemnified for some of these losses and to an offset for interest received by the plaintiff prior to a judgment.

29


On May 17, 2013, plaintiff inIKB International S.A. in Liquidation, et al. v. Morgan Stanley, et al. filed a complaint against MS&Co. and certain affiliates in the Supreme Court of NY. The complaint alleges that defendants made material misrepresentations and omissions in the sale to plaintiff of certain mortgage pass-through certificates backed by securitization trusts containing residential mortgage loans. The total amount of certificates allegedly sponsored, underwritten and/or sold by MS&Co. to plaintiff was approximately $133 million. The complaint alleges causes of action against MS&Co. for common law fraud, fraudulent concealment, aiding and abetting fraud, and negligent misrepresentation, and seeks, among other things, compensatory and punitive damages. On October 29, 2014, the court granted in part and denied in part MS&Co.’s motion to dismiss. All claims regarding four certificates were dismissed. After these dismissals, the remaining amount of certificates allegedly issued by MS&Co. or sold to plaintiff by MS&Co. was approximately $116 million. On August 11, 2016, the Appellate Division, First Department affirmed the trial court’s decision denying in part MS&Co.’s motion to dismiss the complaint. At JuneMarch 25, 2018,2019, the current unpaid balance of the mortgage pass-through certificates at issue in this action was approximately $24$23 million, and the certificates had incurred actual losses of $58 million. Based on currently available information, MS&Co. believes it could incur a loss in this action up to the difference between the $24$23 million unpaid balance of these certificates (plus any losses incurred) and their fair market value at the time of a judgment against MS&Co., or upon sale, pluspre- and post-judgment interest, fees and costs. MS&Co. may be entitled to be indemnified for some of these losses and to an offset for interest received by the plaintiff prior to a judgment.

On April 1, 2016,In August of 2017, MS&Co. was named as a defendant in a purported antitrust class action in the California Attorney General’s Office filed an action against MS&Co. in California state courtUnited States District Court for the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York styledCalifornia v. Morgan Stanley, et al., on behalf of California investors, including the CaliforniaIowa Public Employees’ Retirement System et al. v. Bank of America Corporation et al. Plaintiffs allege, inter alia, that MS&Co., together with a number of other financial institution defendants, violated U.S. antitrust laws and New York state law in connection with their alleged efforts to prevent the California Teachers’ Retirement System.development of electronic exchange-based platforms for securities lending. The class action complaint was filed on behalf of a purported class of borrowers and lenders who entered into stock loan transactions with the defendants. The class action complaint seeks, among other relief, certification of the class of plaintiffs and treble damages. On September 27, 2018, the court denied the defendants’ motion to dismiss the class action complaint.

30


Beginning on March 25, 2019, MS&Co. was named as a defendant in a series of putative class action complaints filed in the Southern District of New York, the first of which is styledAlaska Electrical Pension Fund v. BofA Secs., Inc., et al. Each complaint alleges that MS&Co. made misrepresentationsa conspiracy to fix prices and omissions regarding residential mortgage-backed securities and notesrestrain competition in the market for unsecured bonds issued by the Cheyne SIV (defined below),following Government-Sponsored Enterprises: the Federal National Mortgage Associate; the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation; the Federal Farm Credit Banks Funding Corporation; and asserts violationsthe Federal Home Loan Banks. The purported class period for each suit is from January 1, 2012 to June 1, 2018. Each complaint raises a claim under Section 1 of the California False ClaimsSherman Act and seeks, among other state lawsthings, injunctive relief and seeks treble damages, civil penalties, disgorgement, and injunctive relief. On September 30, 2016, the court granted MS&Co.’s demurrer, with leave to replead. On October 21, 2016, the California Attorney General filed an amended complaint. On January 25, 2017, the court denied MS&Co.’s demurrer with respect to the amended complaint.compensatory damages.

Settled Civil Litigation

On December 23, 2009, the Federal Home Loan Bank of Seattle filed a complaint against MS&Co. and another defendant in the Superior Court of the State of Washington, styledFederal Home Loan Bank of Seattle v. Morgan Stanley & Co. Inc., et al. The amended complaint, filed on September 28, 2010, alleges that defendants made untrue statements and material omissions in the sale to plaintiff of certain mortgage pass-through certificates backed by securitization trusts containing residential mortgage loans. The total amount of certificates allegedly sold to plaintiff by MS&Co. was approximately $233 million. The complaint raises claims under the Washington State Securities Act and seeks, among other things, to rescind the plaintiff’s purchase of such certificates. On January 23, 2017, the parties reached an agreement to settle the litigation.

On March 15, 2010, the Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco filed a complaint against MS&Co. and other defendants in the Superior Court of the State of California styledFederal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco v. Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC, et al. An amended complaint filed on June 10, 2010 alleged that defendants made untrue statements and material omissions in connection with the sale to plaintiff of a number of mortgage pass-through certificates backed by securitization trusts containing residential mortgage loans. The amount of certificates allegedly sold to plaintiff by MS&Co. was approximately $704 million. The complaint raised claims under both the federal securities laws and California law and sought, among other things, to rescind the plaintiff’s purchase of such certificates. On January 26, 2015, as a result of a settlement with certain other defendants, the plaintiff requested and the court subsequently entered a dismissal with prejudice of certain of the plaintiff’s claims, including all remaining claims against MS&Co.

30


On March 15, 2010, the Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco filed a complaint against MS&Co. and other defendants in the Superior Court of the State of California styledFederal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco v. Deutsche Bank Securities Inc. et al. An amended complaint, filed on June 10, 2010, alleges that defendants made untrue statements and material omissions in connection with the sale to plaintiff of certain mortgage pass-through certificates backed by securitization trusts containing residential mortgage loans. The amount of certificates allegedly sold to plaintiff by MS&Co. was approximately $276 million. The complaint raises claims under both the federal securities laws and California law and seeks, among other things, to rescind the plaintiff’s purchase of such certificates. On December 21, 2016, the parties reached an agreement to settle the litigation.

On July 9, 2010 and February 11, 2011, Cambridge Place Investment Management Inc. filed two separate complaints against MS&Co. and/or its affiliates and other defendants in the Superior Court of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, both styledCambridge Place Investment Management Inc. v. Morgan Stanley & Co., Inc., et al. The complaints asserted claims on behalf of certain clients of plaintiff’s affiliates and allegedallege that defendants made untrue statements and

31


material omissions in the sale of a number of mortgage pass-through certificates backed by securitization trusts containing residential mortgage loans. The total amount of certificates allegedly issued by MS&Co. and/or its affiliates or sold to plaintiff’s affiliates’ clients by MS&Co. and/or its affiliates in the two matters was approximately $263 million. On February 11, 2014, the parties entered into an agreement to settle the litigation. On February 20, 2014, the court dismissed the action.

On October 25, 2010, MS&Co., certain affiliates and Pinnacle Performance Limited, a special purpose vehicle (“SPV”), were named as defendants in a purported class action in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (“SDNY”), styledGe Dandong, et al. v. Pinnacle Performance Ltd., et al. On January 31, 2014, the plaintiffs in the action, which related to securities issued by the SPV in Singapore, filed a second amended complaint, which asserted common law claims of fraud, aiding and abetting fraud, fraudulent inducement, aiding and abetting fraudulent inducement, and breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing. On July 17, 2014, the parties reached an agreement to settle the litigation, which received final court approval on July 2, 2015.

On July 5, 2011, Allstate Insurance Company and certain of its affiliated entities filed a complaint against MS&Co. in the Supreme Court of NY, styledAllstate Insurance Company, et al. v. Morgan Stanley, et al. An amended complaint was filed on September 9, 2011, and alleged that the defendants made untrue statements and material omissions in the sale to the plaintiffs of certain mortgage pass-through certificates backed by securitization trusts containing residential mortgage loans. The total amount of certificates allegedly issued and/or sold to the plaintiffs by MS&Co. was approximately $104 million. The complaint raised common law claims of fraud, fraudulent inducement, aiding and abetting fraud, and negligent misrepresentation and seeks,sought, among other things, compensatory and/or recessionary damages associated with the plaintiffs’ purchases of such certificates. On January 16, 2015, the parties reached an agreement to settle the litigation.

On July 18, 2011, the Western and Southern Life Insurance Company and certain affiliated companies filed a complaint against MS&Co. and other defendants in the Court of Common Pleas in Ohio, styledWestern and Southern Life Insurance Company, et al. v. Morgan Stanley Mortgage Capital Inc., et al. An amended complaint was filed on April 2, 2012 and alleged that defendants made untrue statements and material omissions in the sale to plaintiffs of certain mortgage pass-through certificates backed by securitization trusts containing residential mortgage loans. The amount of the certificates allegedly sold to plaintiffs by MS&Co. was approximately $153 million. On June 8, 2015, the parties reached an agreement to settle the litigation.

On September 2, 2011, the Federal Housing Finance Agency, as conservator for Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, filed 17 complaints against numerous financial services companies, including MS&Co. and certain affiliates. A complaint against MS&Co. and certain affiliates and other defendants was filed in the Supreme Court of NY, styledFederal Housing Finance Agency, as Conservator v. Morgan Stanley et al. The complaint alleged that defendants

31


made untrue statements and material omissions in connection with the sale to Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac of residential mortgage pass-through certificates with an original unpaid balance of approximately $11 billion. The complaint raised claims under federal and state securities laws and common law and sought, among other things, rescission and compensatory and punitive damages. On February 7, 2014, the parties entered into an agreement to settle the litigation. On February 20, 2014, the court dismissed the action.

On April 25, 2012, Metropolitan Life Insurance Company and certain affiliates filed a complaint against MS&Co. and certain affiliates in the Supreme Court of NY, styledMetropolitan Life Insurance Company, et al. v. Morgan Stanley, et al. An amended complaint was filed on June 29, 2012, and alleged that the defendants made untrue statements and material omissions in the sale to the plaintiffs of certain mortgage pass-through certificates backed by securitization trusts containing residential mortgage loans. The total amount of certificates allegedly sponsored, underwritten, and/or sold by MS&Co. was approximately $758 million. The amended complaint raised common law claims of fraud, fraudulent inducement, and aiding and abetting fraud and sought, among other things, rescission, compensatory, and/or rescissionary damages, as well as punitive damages, associated with the plaintiffs’ purchases of such certificates. On April 11, 2014, the parties entered into a settlement agreement.

On April 25, 2012, The Prudential Insurance Company of America and certain affiliates filed a complaint against MS&Co. and certain affiliates in the Superior Court of the State of New Jersey, styledThe Prudential Insurance Company of America, et al. v. Morgan Stanley, et al. On October 16, 2012, plaintiffs filed an amended complaint. The amended complaint alleged that defendants made untrue statements and material omissions in connection with the sale to plaintiffs of certain mortgage pass-through certificates backed by securitization trusts containing residential mortgage loans. The total amount of certificates allegedly sponsored, underwritten and/or sold by MS&Co. was approximately $1.073 billion. The amended complaint raised claims under the New Jersey Uniform Securities Law, as well as common law claims of negligent misrepresentation, fraud, fraudulent inducement, equitable fraud, aiding and abetting fraud, and violations of the New Jersey Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act,RICO statute, and included a claim for treble damages. On January 8, 2016, the parties reached an agreement to settle the litigation.

32


In re Morgan Stanley Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Litigation, which had been pending in the SDNY, was a putative class action involving allegations that, among other things, the registration statements and offering documents related to the offerings of certain mortgage pass-through certificates in 2006 and 2007 contained false and misleading information concerning the pools of residential loans that backed these securitizations. On December 18, 2014, the parties’ agreement to settle the litigation received final court approval, and on December 19, 2014, the court entered an order dismissing the action.

On November 4, 2011, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”), as receiver for Franklin Bank S.S.B, filed two complaints against MS&Co. in the District Court of the State of Texas. Each was styledFederal Deposit Insurance Corporation as Receiver for Franklin Bank, S.S.B v. Morgan Stanley & Company LLC F/K/A Morgan Stanley & Co. Inc. and alleged that MS&Co. made untrue statements and material omissions in connection with the sale to plaintiff of mortgage pass-through certificates backed by securitization trusts containing residential mortgage loans. The amount of certificates allegedly underwritten and sold to plaintiff by MS&Co. in these cases was approximately $67 million and $35 million, respectively. On July 2, 2015, the parties reached an agreement to settle the litigation.

On February 14, 2013, Bank Hapoalim B.M. filed a complaint against MS&Co. and certain affiliates in the Supreme Court of NY, styledBank Hapoalim B.M. v. Morgan Stanley et al. The complaint alleged that defendants made material misrepresentations and omissions in the sale to plaintiff of certain mortgage pass-through certificates backed by securitization trusts containing residential mortgage loans. The total amount of certificates allegedly sponsored, underwritten and/or sold by MS&Co. to plaintiff was approximately $141 million. On July 28, 2015, the

32


parties reached an agreement to settle the litigation, and on August 12, 2015, the plaintiff filed a stipulation of discontinuance with prejudice.

On September 23, 2013, the plaintiff inNational Credit Union Administration Board v. Morgan Stanley & Co. Inc., et al.filed a complaint against MS&Co. and certain affiliates in the SDNY. The complaint alleged that defendants made untrue statements of material fact or omitted to state material facts in the sale to the plaintiff of certain mortgage pass-through certificates issued by securitization trusts containing residential mortgage loans. The total amount of certificates allegedly sponsored, underwritten and/or sold by MS&Co. to plaintiffs in the matter was approximately $417 million. The complaint alleged violations of federal and various state securities laws and sought, among other things, rescissionary and compensatory damages. On November 23, 2015, the parties reached an agreement to settle the matter.

On September 16, 2014, the Virginia Attorney General’s Office filed a civil lawsuit, styledCommonwealth of Virginia ex rel. Integra REC LLC v. Barclays Capital Inc., et al., against MS&Co. and several other defendants in the Circuit Court of the City of Richmond related to RMBS. The lawsuit alleged that MS&Co. and the other defendants knowingly made misrepresentations and omissions related to the loans backing RMBS purchased by the Virginia Retirement System. The complaint asserted claims under the Virginia Fraud Against Taxpayers Act, as well as common law claims of actual and constructive fraud, and sought, among other things, treble damages and civil penalties. On January 6, 2016, the parties reached an agreement to settle the litigation. An order dismissing the action with prejudice was entered on January 28, 2016.

On April 20, 2011, the Federal Home Loan Bank of Boston filed a complaint against MS&Co. and other defendants in the Superior Court of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts styledFederal Home Loan Bank of Boston v. Ally Financial, Inc. F/K/A GMAC LLC et al. An

33


amended complaint was filed on June 29, 2012 and allegedalleges that defendants made untrue statements and material omissions in the sale to plaintiff of certain mortgage pass-through certificates backed by securitization trusts containing residential mortgage loans. The total amount of certificates allegedly issued by MS&Co. or sold to plaintiff by MS&Co. was approximately $385 million. The amended complaint raised claims under the Massachusetts Uniform Securities Act, the Massachusetts Consumer Protection Act and common law and sought, among other things, to rescind the plaintiff’s purchase of such certificates. On November 25, 2013, July 16, 2014, and May 19, 2015, respectively, the plaintiff voluntarily dismissed its claims against MS&Co. with respect to three of the securitizations at issue. After these voluntary dismissals, the remaining amount of certificates allegedly issued by MS&Co. or sold to plaintiff by MS&Co. was approximately $332 million. On July 13, 2018, the parties reached an agreement in principle to settle the litigation.

On May 3, 2013, plaintiffs inDeutsche Zentral-Genossenschaftsbank AG et al. v. Morgan Stanley et al. filed a complaint against MS&Co., certain affiliates, and other defendants in the Supreme Court of NY. The complaint alleged that defendants made material misrepresentations and omissions in the sale to plaintiffs of certain mortgage pass-through certificates backed by securitization trusts containing residential mortgage loans. The total amount of certificates allegedly sponsored, underwritten and/or sold by MS&Co. to plaintiff was approximately $634 million. The complaint allegesalleged causes of action against MS&Co. for common law fraud, fraudulent concealment, aiding and abetting fraud, negligent misrepresentation, and rescission and seeks,sought, among other things, compensatory and punitive damages. On June 26, 2018, the parties entered into an agreement to settle the litigation.

On April 1, 2016, the California Attorney General’s Office filed an action against MS&Co. in California state court styledCalifornia v. Morgan Stanley, et al., on behalf of California investors, including the California Public Employees’ Retirement System and the California Teachers’ Retirement System. The complaint alleged that MS&Co. made misrepresentations and omissions regarding residential mortgage-backed securities and notes issued by the Cheyne SIV, and asserted violations of the California False Claims Act and other state laws and sought treble damages, civil penalties, disgorgement, and injunctive relief. On April 24, 2019, the parties reached an agreement to settle the litigation.

Additional lawsuits containing claims similar to those described above may be filed in the future. In the course of its business, MS&Co., as a major futures commission merchant, is party to various civil actions, claims and routine regulatory investigations and proceedings that the General Partner believes do not have a material effect on the business of MS&Co. MS&Co. may establish reserves from time to time in connections with such actions.

 

33

34


Item 1A.

Risk Factors.

There have been no material changes to the risk factors set forth under Part I, Item 1A. “Risk Factors.” in the Partnership’s Annual Report on Form10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017 and under Part II, Item 1A. “Risk Factors.” in the Partnership’s Quarterly Report on Form10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2018.

Item 2.

Item 2.Unregistered SalesUnregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.

For the three months ended June 30, 2018,March 31, 2019, there were additional subscriptions of 1,218.556039,246.7420 Class A limited partner Redeemable Units totaling $1,565,000.$51,042,913, 99.2020 Class Z limited partner Redeemable Units totaling $100,000 and 671.4640 Class Z General Partner Redeemable Units totaling $680,750. Redeemable Units are issued in reliance upon applicable exemptions from registration under Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act and Section 506 of Regulation D promulgated thereunder. Redeemable Units are purchased by accredited investors, as defineddescribed in Regulation D. In determining the applicability of the exemption, the General Partner relies on the fact that Redeemable Units are purchased by accredited investors in a private offering.

Proceeds from the sale of Redeemable Units are used for the trading of commodity interests including futures, optionsoption and forward contracts.

The following chart sets forth the purchases of limited partner Redeemable Units for each Class by the Partnership.

 

Period Class A (a) Total
Number of
Redeemable Units
Purchased*
  Class A (b) Average
Price Paid per
Redeemable Unit **
  (c) Total Number of
Redeemable Units
Purchased as Part of
Publicly  Announced
Plans or Programs
  (d) Maximum Number
(or Approximate Dollar
Value) of Redeemable
Units that  May Yet Be
Purchased Under the
Plans or Programs
 

April 1, 2018 - April 30, 2018

  1,555.8710    $1,288.49    N/A       N/A     

May 1, 2018 - May 31, 2018

  887.2060    $1,316.02    N/A       N/A     

June 1, 2018 - June 30, 2018

  915.5050    $1,295.03    N/A       N/A     
   3,358.5820    $1,297.55          
                                                                                    
Period  Class A (a) Total
Number of
Redeemable Units  
Purchased*
  Class A (b) Average
Price Paid per
  Redeemable Unit **  
  (c) Total Number  of
Redeemable Units
  Purchased as Part of  
Publicly Announced
Plans or Programs
  (d) Maximum Number
(or Approximate Dollar
Value) of Redeemable
Units that May Yet Be
Purchased Under the
Plans or Programs

January 1, 2019 - January 31, 2019

   975.0180   $1,291.06   N/A  N/A

February 1, 2019 - February 28, 2019

   1,514.8200   $1,321.40   N/A  N/A

March 1, 2019 - March 31, 2019

   403.5840   $1,339.30   N/A  N/A
    2,893.4220   $1,313.67       

 

*

Generally, limited partners are permitted to redeem their Redeemable Units as of the end of each month on three business days’ notice to the General Partner. Under certain circumstances, the General Partner can compel redemption, although to date the General Partner has not exercised this right. Purchases of Redeemable Units by the Partnership reflected in the chart above were made in the ordinary course of the Partnership’s business in connection with effecting redemptions for limited partners.

 

**

Redemptions of Redeemable Units are effected as of the end of each month at the net asset value per Redeemable Unit as of that day. No fee will be charged for redemptions.

 

Item 3.

3.Defaults Upon Senior Securities. —None.

Item 4.

4.Mine Safety Disclosures. —Not applicable.Applicable.

Item 5.

5.Other Information. —None.

 

34

35


36


SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

 

CERES TACTICAL COMMODITY L.P.

By:

 

Ceres Managed Futures LLC

 

        (General(General Partner)

By:

 

/s/ Patrick T. Egan                                         

Patrick T. Egan

 

        President and DirectorPatrick T. Egan

President and Director

Date:

 

        AugustMay 9, 20182019

By:

 

/s/ Steven Ross                                               

Steven Ross

 

Steven Ross

Chief Financial Officer and Director

 

        (Principal(Principal Accounting Officer)

Date:

 

        AugustMay 9, 20182019

The General Partner which signed the above is the only party authorized to act for the registrant. The registrant has no principal executive officer, principal financial officer, controller, or principal accounting officer and has no Board of Directors.

 

36

37