UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
 
FORM 10-Q
 
xQUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
x   QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
 
For the quarterly period ended SeptemberJune 30, 20092010
 
OR
 
oTRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
o   TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
 
For the transition period from             to            
 
Commission File Number 0-51378
 
TECHPRECISION CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
 
DELAWARE 51-0539828
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
   
Bella Drive, Westminster, Massachusetts 01473 01473
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)
 
(978) 874-0591
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes x       No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).     Yeso       No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
 
   Large accelerated filer  o  
Accelerated filer                                      o
   
 
Non-Accelerated Filer  
o  
 
Smaller reporting company                   x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    Yes o    No  x

The number of shares of the Registrant’s common stock, par value $.0001 per share, issued and outstanding at November 11, 2009August 9, 2010 was 13,930,846.14,230,846.



TABLE OF CONTENTS


Page
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION 1
ITEM 1.FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)  1
C CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS  1
C CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS  2
    CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS  3
ITEM 2.i    ITEM 2.
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS  15
ITEM 4.CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES  22
PART II.OTHER INFORMATION  22
ITEM 5.OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 6.  EXHIBITS  22
SIGNATURES  23
EXHIBIT INDEX  24
 
 

 


 TECHPRECISION CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Unaudited)
  September 30, 2009  March 31, 2009 
  (unaudited)  (audited) 
ASSETS 
Current assets      
Cash and cash equivalents $9,537,327  $10,462,737 
Accounts receivable, less allowance for doubtful accounts of $25,000  3,031,150   1,418,830 
Costs incurred on uncompleted contracts, in excess of progress billings  3,603,134   3,660,802 
Inventories - raw materials  303,899   351,356 
Deferred tax asset  194,192   -- 
Prepaid expenses  164,247   1,583,234 
Other receivables  30,000   59,979 
     Total current assets  16,863,949   17,536,938 
Property, plant and equipment, net  3,460,430   2,763,434 
Equipment under construction  -   887,279 
Deferred loan cost, net  96,153   104,666 
     Total assets $20,420,532  $21,292,317 
         
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY        
Current liabilities:        
Accounts payable $348,486   950,681 
Accrued expenses  541,306   710,332 
Accrued taxes  498,448   155,553 
Deferred revenues  1,777,472   3,945,364 
Current maturity of long-term debt  752,646   624,818 
     Total current liabilities  3,918,358   6,386,748 
         
LONG-TERM DEBT        
Notes payable- noncurrent  5,303,275   4,824,453 
         
STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY        
Preferred stock- par value $.0001 per share, 10,000,000 shares        
    authorized, of which 9,890,980 are designated as Series A Preferred        
    Stock, with 9,890,980 shares issued and outstanding at September 30, 2009        
    and 6,295,508 at March 31, 2009 (liquidation preference of  $2,818,930 and $1,794,220 at September 30, 2009 and March 31, 2009, respectively.)  2,287,508   2,287,508 
Common stock -par value $.0001 per share, authorized,        
    90,000,000 shares, issued and outstanding, 13,930,846        
    shares at September 30, 2009 and 13,907,513 at March 31, 2009  1,394   1,392 
Paid in capital  2,794,671   2,872,779 
Retained earnings  6,115,326   4,919,437 
     Total stockholders’ equity  11,198,899   10,081,116 
     Total liabilities and stockholders' equity $20,420,532  $21,292,317 
         
  June 30, 2010  March 31, 2010 
       
ASSETS      
Current assets      
Cash and cash equivalents $9,591,182  $8,774,223 
Accounts receivable, less allowance for doubtful accounts of $259,999  2,592,259   2,693,392 
Costs incurred on uncompleted contracts, in excess of progress billings  3,225,467   2,749,848 
Inventories - raw materials  285,344   299,403 
Deferred tax asset  226,517   303,509 
Prepaid expenses  143,908   159,854 
Income taxes receivable  244,461   244,461 
     Total current assets  16,309,138   15,224,690 
Property, plant and equipment, net  3,269,569   3,349,943 
Equipment under construction  762,260   762,260 
Deferred loan cost, net  83,814   87,640 
     Total assets $20,424,781  $19,424,533 
         
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY        
Current liabilities:        
Accounts payable $620,722  $444,735 
Accrued expenses  513,296   620,600 
Accrued income taxes  285,319   -- 
Deferred revenues  60,957   56,376 
Current maturity of long-term debt  809,726   809,309 
     Total current liabilities  2,290,020   1,931,020 
Long-term debt  5,210,329   5,414,002 
Commitments (Note 12)        
STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY        
Preferred stock- par value $.0001 per share, 10,000,000 shares authorized, of which        
    9,890,980 are designated as Series A Convertible Preferred Stock, with        
    9,661,482 shares issued and outstanding at June 30, 2010 and March 31, 2010        
    (liquidation preference of  $2,753,523 at June 30, 2010 and March 31, 2010)  2,210,216   2,210,216 
Common stock -par value $.0001 per share, 90,000,000 shares authorized,        
    issued and outstanding: 14,230,846 shares at June 30, 2010 and March 31, 2010              1,424   1,424 
Additional paid in capital  2,929,298   2,903,699 
Retained earnings  7,783,494   6,964,172 
     Total stockholders’ equity  12,924,432   12,079,511 
     Total liabilities and stockholders' equity $20,424,781  $19,424,533 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.
 
-1-



 
TECHPRECISION CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(unaudited)(Unaudited)
 
 Three months ended  Six months ended  Three months ended 
 September 30,  September 30,  June 30, 
 2009  2008  2009  2008  2010 2009 
                 
Net sales $15,117,114  $13,601,010  $18,436,025  $25,259,144  $6,153,502  $3,318,911 
Cost of sales  12,471,343   8,588,210   15,225,452   16,866,013   3,837,711   2,754,109 
                
Gross profit  2,645,771   5,012,800   3,210,573   8,393,131   2,315,791   564,802 
Operating expenses:                       
Salaries and related expenses  331,302   322,035   724,669   757,130   400,011   393,367 
Professional fees  110,411   72,782   186,623   120,469   177,650   76,212 
Selling, general and administrative   226,573   150,138   524,994   289,134   440,283   298,421 
Total operating expenses   668,286   544,955   1,436,286   1,166,733   1,017,944   768,000 
Income from operations  1,977,485   4,467,845   1,774,287   7,226,398 
                
Other income (expenses)                
Income (loss) from operations  1,297,847   (203,198)
Other income (expenses):       
Other income 60,000 -- 
Interest expense  (107,390)  (115,090)  (211,552)  (233,871)  (107,567)  (104,162)
Interest income  5,184   -   8,370   -   2,733   3,186 
Finance costs  (4,257)  (4,687)  (8,513)  (8,513)  (2,589)  (4,256)
Total other income (expense)  (47,423)  (105,232)
Income (loss) before income taxes  1,250,424   (308,430)
Income tax expense (benefit)  431,102   (183,685)
Net income (loss) $819,322  $(124,745)
                     
Total other income (expense)  (106,463)  (119,777)  (211,695)  (242,384)
                
Income before income taxes  1,871,022   4,348,068   1,562,592   6,984,014 
                
Provision for income taxes  550,388   1,871,968   366,703   2,936,218 
                
Net income $1,320,634  $2,476,100  $1,195,889  $4,047,796 
                
Net income per share of common stock (basic) $0.09  $0.18  $0.09  $0.30 
Net income per share (fully diluted) $0.06  $0.09  $0.06  $0.15 
Net income (loss) per share of common stock (basic) $0.06  $(0.01)
Net income (loss) per share (diluted) $0.04  $(0.01)
Weighted average number of shares outstanding (basic)  13,916,462   13,823,245   13,912,012   13,379,358   14,230,846   13,907,513 
Weighted average number of shares outstanding (fully diluted)  21,300,150   26,978,330   19,930,238   26,736,678 
                
Weighted average number of shares outstanding (diluted)  20,759,521   13,907,513 
 
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.
 
-2-


 
TECHPRECISION CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
(unaudited)(Unaudited)
 
 Six Months Ended  Three Months Ended 
 September 30,  June 30, 
 2009 2008  2010 2009 
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES          
Net income $1,195,889  $4,047,796 
Net income (loss) $819,322  $(124,745)
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:                
Depreciation and amortization  208,016   275,378   91,347   121,383 
Share based compensation 7,500  --  80,973  -- 
Deferred income taxes 76,991  (246,133)
Gain on sale of equipment (60,000) -- 
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:                
Accounts receivable  (1,612,320)  1,216,678    101,132   (206,744)
Deferred income taxes  (194,192)  (133,999
Inventory  47,457   (111,909)  14,059   46,195 
Costs incurred on uncompleted contracts  7,254,185   313,021   (475,619)  (454,217)
Other receivables  29,979   -- 
Prepaid expenses  1,418,987   (1,575,887)
Other current assets  15,946   27,390 
Accounts payable  (602,195)  2,388,747   175,987   (318,960)
Accrued expenses  173,869   1,323,035   (107,304)  (138,565)
Customer advances  (9,364,407)  (416,638)
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities  (1,437,232)   7,383,852 
Accrued taxes 285,319 (155,553)
Deferred revenues  4,581   593,307 
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities  1,022,734   (856,642)
                
CASH FLOW FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES              -- 
Proceeds from sale of equipment 60,000  -- 
Purchases of property, plant and equipment  (9,220)  (137,609)  (7,146)                  -- 
Deposits on equipment  -   (150,000)
Net cash used in investing activities  (9,220)  (287,609)
Net cash provided by investing activities  52,854   -- 
                
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES                
Capital distribution of WMR equity  (92,256)  (93,548)  (55,373)  (45,384)
Proceeds from exercised stock options and warrants  6,650   170,060 
Borrowings under line of credit facility 919,297 - 
Payment of notes and lease obligations  (312,649)  (306,072)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities  521,042   (229,560)
Payment of notes and capital lease obligations  (203,256)  (156,768)
Net cash used in financing activities  (258,629)  (202,152)
                
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents  (925,410)  6,866,683 
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents  816,959   (1,058,794)
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period  10,462,737   2,852,676   8,774,223   10,462,737 
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period $9,537,327  $9,719,359  $9,591,182  $9,403,943 
                
     
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES OF CASH FLOWS INFORMATION        
Cash paid during the three months ended June 30, for:        
Interest expense
  107,703  $104,162 
Income taxes $ 95,000  $218,000 
 
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.

-3-



TECHPRECISION CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
(unaudited)

  Six Months Ended September 30, 
  2009  2008 
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES OF CASH FLOWS INFORMATION      
Cash paid during the year for:      
Interest expense $208,451  $236,276 
Income taxes $218,000  $1,621,138 
SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION – NONCASH TRANSACTIONS:

SixThree months Ended Septemberended June 30, 2010 and 2009

The company placed $887,279 of equipment which was under construction at the beginning of the six month period ended September 30, 2009fiscal year ending March 31, 2010 (“fiscal 2010”) into service.

On August 14, 2009, the Company entered into a warrant exchange agreement pursuant to which the Company agreed to issue 3,595,472 shares of Series A convertible preferred stock to certain investors in exchange for warrants to purchase 9,320,000 shares of common stock. The warrants carried exercise prices ranging from $0.44 to $0.65 per share. Effective September 11, 2009, the warrants were surrendered to the Company, the Company filed an amendment to its certificate of designation relating to its Series A convertible Preferred Stock to increase the number of designated shares of Series A convertible preferred stock, and the 3,595,472 shares of Series A preferred stock were issued pursuant to the terms of the warrant exchange agreement.  All warrants surrendered in connection with the warrant exchange were cancelled.

Six months Ended September 30, 2008

During the six months ended September 30, 2008, the Company issued 944,518 shares of common stock upon conversion of 722,556 shares of series A preferred stock, based on a conversion ratio of 1.3072 shares of common stock for each share of series A preferred stock. The conversion price of each share of common stock was computed at $0.2180 for a total of  $255,040.
During the six months ended September 30, 2008, the Company issued 390,000 shares of common stock upon exercise of 390,000 warrants having an exercise price of $.43605.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.
 
-4--3-


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)

NOTE 1 - DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS
 
TechprecisionTechPrecision Corporation (“Techprecision”TechPrecision”) is a Delaware corporation organized in February 2005 under the name Lounsberry Holdings II, Inc. The name was changed to TechprecisionTechPrecision Corporation on March 6, 2006.  TechprecisionTechPrecision is the parent company of Ranor, Inc. (“Ranor”), a Delaware corporation.  TechprecisionTechPrecision and Ranor are collectively referred to as the “Company.”
 
The Company manufactures metal fabricated and machined precision components and equipment.  These products are used in a variety of markets including the alternative energy, medical, nuclear, defense, industrial, and aerospace industries.
 
NOTE 2 - SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
 
Basis of Presentation and Consolidation
 
On February 24, 2006, TechprecisionTechPrecision acquired all stock of Ranor in a transaction which is accounted for as a recapitalization (reverse acquisition), with Ranor being treated as the acquiring company for accounting purposes. The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and Ranor as well as a variable interest entity, WM Realty. Intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated in consolidation.

InThe accompanying consolidated financial statements as of June 30, 2010 and 2009 and for the three months then ended are unaudited, but in the opinion of the management, include all adjustments that are considered necessary for a fair presentation of its respective financial statements in accordance with StatementGAAP. All adjustments are of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 165, “Subsequent Events” (SFAS No. 165),a normal, recurring nature, except as otherwise disclosed. The March 31, 2010 Consolidated Balance Sheets were taken from audited financial statements. Certain prior year amounts in the Company performed an evaluationConsolidated Statements of subsequent eventsCash Flows have been reclassified between line items for comparative purposes. The reclassifications did not affect the accompanyingCompany’s cash flows from operating activities or financial statements and notes included in Part 1, Item 1 of this report through November 11, 2009, the date this Report was issued. position.

The Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements have been prepared pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) for Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q. Certain information and note disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with GAAP have been condensed or omitted pursuant to such rules and regulations. These notes should be read in conjunction with the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements of the Company in Item 8 of the 20092010 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
 
Use of Estimates in the Preparation of Financial Statements
 
In preparing financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles, management is required to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and revenues and expenses during the reported period.  Actual results could differ from those estimates.
 
Fair ValuesValue of Financial Instruments

We account for fair value of financial instruments under the Financial Accounting Standard Board’s (FASB) authoritative guidance,which defines fair value, and establishes a framework to measure fair value and the related disclosures about fair value measurements. The fair value of a financial instrument is the amount that could be received upon the sale of an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. Financial assets are marked to bid prices and financial liabilities are marked to offer prices. Fair value measurements do not include transaction costs. The FASB establishes a fair value hierarchy used to prioritize the quality and reliability of the information used to determine fair values. CategorizationCategoriz ation within the fair value hierarchy is based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. The fair value hierarchy is defined into the following three categories:

Level 1:  Inputs based upon quoted market prices for identical assets or liabilities in active markets at the measurement date.

Level 2:  Observable inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1, such as quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets; quoted prices for identical or similar assets and liabilities in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data.

Level 3:  Inputs that are management’s best estimate of what market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability at the measurement date.  The inputs are unobservable in the market and significant to the instruments’ valuation.
-5-


In addition, we will measure fair value in an inactive or dislocated market based on facts and circumstances and significant management judgment.  We will use inputs based on management estimates or assumptions, or make adjustments to observable inputs to determine fair value when markets are not active and relevant observable inputs are not available.  
  
The carrying amount of cash and cash equivalents, trade accounts receivable, accounts payable, prepaid and accrued expenses, and notes payable, as presented in the balance sheet, approximatesapproximate fair value.

-4-

Cash and cash equivalents
 
Holdings of highly liquid investments with maturities of three months or less, when purchased, are considered to be cash equivalents.  The carrying amount reported in the balance sheet for cash and cash equivalents approximates its fair value. The deposits are maintained in a large regional bank and the amount of federally insured cash deposits was $250,000 as of SeptemberJune 30, 2009 compared to $100,000 as of September 30, 2008.2010 and March 31, 2010.

Accounts receivable
 
Trade accounts receivable are stated at the amount the Company expects to collect. The Company maintains allowances for doubtful accounts for estimated losses resulting from the inability of its customers to make required payments. Management considers the following factors when determining the collectability of specific customer accounts: customer credit-worthiness, past transaction history with the customer, current economic industry trends, and changes in customer payment terms. If the financial condition of the Company’s customers were to deteriorate, adversely affecting their ability to make payments, additional allowances would be required. Based on management’s assessment, the Company provides for estimated uncollectible amounts through a charge to earnings and a credit to a valuation allowance. Balances that remain outstanding after the Company has used reasonable collection efforts are written off through a charge to the valuation allowance and a credit to accounts receivable. Current earnings are also charged with an allowance for sales returns based on historical experience. There was no bad debt expense recorded for the quarters ended SeptemberJune 30, 20092010 and 2008, respectively.2009.
 
Inventories
 
Inventories - - raw materials is stated at the lower of cost or market determined principally by the first-in, first-out method.
 
Notes Payable
 
We account for all notes that are due and payable in one year as short-term liabilities; carrying amounts approximate fair value.liabilities.

Long-lived Assets
 
Property, plant and equipment are recorded at cost less accumulated depreciation and amortization. Depreciation and amortization are accounted for on the straight-line method based on estimated useful lives. The amortization of leasehold improvements is based on the shorter of the lease term or the useful life of the improvement. Betterments and large renewals, which extend the life of the asset, are capitalized whereas maintenance and repairs and small renewals are expensed as incurred. The estimated useful lives are: machinery and equipment, 7-15 years; buildings, up to 30 years; and leasehold improvements, 10-20 years.
 
The accounting for the impairment or disposal of long-lived assets requires an assessment of the recoverability of our investment in long-lived assets to be held and used in operations whenever events or circumstances indicate that their carrying amounts may not be recoverable. Such assessment requires that the future cash flows associated with the long-lived assets be estimated over their remaining useful lives. An impairment loss may be required when the future cash flows are less than the carrying value of such assetsassets.
 
Repair and maintenance activities
 
The Company incurs maintenance costs on all of its major equipment. Costs that extend the life of the asset, materially add to its value, or adapt the asset to a new or different use are separately capitalized in property, plant and equipment and are depreciated over their estimated useful lives. All other repair and maintenance costs are expensed as incurred.

Leases
 
Operating leases are charged to operations as paid. Capital leases are capitalized and depreciated over the term of the lease.  A lease is considered a capital lease if one of four criteria are satisfied: 1) the lease contains an option to purchase the property for less than fair market value, 2) transfer of ownership at the end of the lease, 3) the lease term is 75% or more of estimated economic life of leased property, and 4) present value of minimum lease payments is at least 90% of fair value of the leased property to the lessor at the inception of the lease.
 
-6-

Convertible Preferred Stock and Warrants
 
The Company measures the fair value of the Series A preferred stockConvertible Preferred Stock by the amount of cash that was received for their issuance. The Companyissuance and determined that the convertible preferred shares and the accompanying warrants issued are equity instruments.

Our preferred stock also met all conditions for the classification as equity instruments. The Company had a sufficient number of authorized shares, there is no required cash payment or net cash settlement requirement and the holders of the seriesSeries A preferred stockConvertible Preferred Stock had no right higher than the common stockholders other than the liquidation preference in the event of liquidation of the Company. Although the Company had an unconditional obligation to issue additional shares of common stock upon conversion of the Series A preferred stockConvertible Preferred Stock if EBITDA per share was below the targeted amount, the certificate of designation relating to the seriesSeries A preferred stockConvertible P referred Stock does not require the Company to issue shares that are registered pursuant to the Securities Act of 1933, and as a result, the additional shares issuable upon conversion of the Series A preferred stock need not be registered shares.1933.
-5-

 
The Company’s warrants were excluded from derivative accounting because they were indexed to the Company’s own unregistered common stock and are classified in stockholders’ equity. The majority of warrants were exchanged for preferred stock on August 14, 2009.  At June 30, 2010, the Company had 112,500 warrants issued and outstanding.
   
Shipping Costs 
 
Shipping and handling costs are included in cost of sales in the Consolidated Statements of Operations for all periods presented.
 
Selling, General, and Administrative 
 
Selling expenses include items such as business travel and advertising costs. Advertising costs are expensed as incurred. General and administrative expenses include items for Company’s administrative functions and include costs for items such as office supplies, insurance, telephone, board fees and corporate consulting costs as well as payroll services.
 
Stock Based Compensation
 
Stock based compensation represents the cost related to stock-based awards granted to employees. The Company measures stock based compensation cost at grant date, based on the estimated fair value of the award and recognizes the cost as expense on a straight-line basis (net of estimated forfeitures) over the employee’s requisite service period. The Company estimates the fair value of stock options using a Black-Scholes valuation model.
 
Earnings per Share of Common Stock
 
Basic net income per common share is computed by dividing net income or loss by the weighted average number of shares outstanding during the period. Diluted net income per common share is calculated using net income divided by diluted weighted-average shares. Diluted weighted-average shares include weighted-average shares outstanding plus the dilutive effect of potential common stock issuable in respect of convertible preferred stock, warrants and share-based compensation were calculated using the treasury stock method.
 
Revenue Recognition and Costs Incurred
 
Revenue and costs are recognized on the units of delivery method. This method recognizes as revenue the contract price of units of the product delivered during each period and the costs allocable to the delivered units as the cost of earned revenue. When the sales agreements provide for separate billing of engineering services, the revenues for those services are recognized when the services are completed. Costs allocable to undelivered units are reported in the balance sheet as costs incurred on uncompleted contracts. Amounts in excess of agreed upon contract price for customer directed changes, constructive changes, customer delays or other causes of additional contract costs are recognized in contract value if it is probable that a claim for such amounts will result in additional revenue and the amounts can be reasonably estimated. Revisions in cost and profit estimates are reflected in the period in which the facts requiring the revision become known and are estimable. The unit of delivery method requires the existence of a contract to provide the persuasive evidence of an arrangement and determinable seller’s price, delivery of the product and reasonable collection prospects. The Company has written agreements with the customers that specify contract prices and delivery terms. The Company recognizes revenues only when the collection prospects are reasonable.
 
Adjustments to cost estimates are made periodically, and losses expected to be incurred on contracts in progress are charged to operations in the period such losses are determined and are reflected as reductions of the carrying value of the costs incurred on uncompleted contracts. Costs incurred on uncompleted contracts consist of labor, overhead, and materials. Work in process is stated at the lower of cost or market and reflect accrued losses, if required, on uncompleted contracts.
-7-


Income Taxes

The Company uses the asset and liability method of financial accounting and reporting for income taxes required by FASB ASC 740,Income Taxes . Under FASB ASC 740, deferred income taxes reflect the tax impact of temporary differences between the amount of assets and liabilities recognized for financial reporting purposes and the amounts recognized for tax purposes.
Temporary differences giving rise to deferred income taxes consist primarily of the reporting of losses on uncompleted contracts, the excess of depreciation for tax purposes over the amount for financial reporting purposes, and accrued expenses accounted for differently for financial reporting and tax purposes, qualified domestic production activities, and net operating loss carry-forwards.
According to FASB ASC 740-270-25,Intraperiod Tax Allocation,tax expense related to interim period ordinary income is computed at an estimated annual effective tax rate and the taxes related to all other items are individually computed and recognized when the items occur.  The tax effects of losses that arise in the early portion of a fiscal year are recognized only when the benefits are expected to be either realized during the year or recognized as a deferred tax asset at the end of the year. Interest and penalties are included in general and administrative expenses.

-6-

Variable Interest Entity (VIE)
 
TheConforming to the authoritative FASB guidance for VIEs, under ASC 810, (see Note 8 for more information related to the VIE), the Company has consolidated WM Realty, a variable interest entity thatwhich entered into a sale and leaseback contract with the Company in 2006, to conform to the authoritative FASB guidance (see Note 9 for more information related to the VIE).2006. The creditors of WM Realty do not have recourse to the general credit of TechPrecision or Ranor.
 
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
 
In July 2010, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2010-20, Receivables (Topic 310): “Disclosures about the Credit Quality of Financing Receivables and the Allowance for Credit Losses” (“ASC 2010-20”). The amendments in this update require additional disclosure about the credit quality of financing receivables, such as aging information and credit quality indicators. Both new and existing disclosures must be disaggregated by portfolio segment or class. The disaggregation of information is based on how allowances for credit losses are developed and how credit exposure is managed. The amendments in this Update affect all entities with financing receivables, excluding short-term trade accounts receivable or receivables measured at fair value or lower of cost or fair value.ASC 2010-20 is effecti ve for interim periods and fiscal years ending after December 15, 2010.  The Company has determined that the adoption of this standard will not have a material effect on its consolidated financial statements.

In February 2010, the FASB issued update No. 2010-09, Subsequent Events (Topic 855): Amendments to Certain Recognition and Disclosure Requirements. This update provides amendments to Subtopic 855-10 for an entity that is an SEC filer and is required to evaluate subsequent events through the date that the financial statements are issued. An entity that is an SEC filer is not required to disclose the date through which subsequent events have been evaluated. The adoption of this update on February 24, 2010 did not have any impact on the consolidated financial statements.

In January 2010, the FASB issued update No. 2010-06, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (Topic 820): Improving Disclosures about Fair Value Measurements. This update amends subtopic 820-10 to require new disclosures about 1) transfers in and out of level 1 and 2, i.e. a reporting entity should disclose separately the amounts of significant transfers in and out of level 1 and 2 fair value measurements and describe the reasons for the transfers, and 2) in the reconciliation for fair value measurements using significant unobservable inputs (level 3), a  reporting entity should present separately information about purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements (i.e. on a gross basis rather than as one net number). This update also provides clarification about existing di sclosures about the level of disaggregation and inputs and valuation techniques.  The new disclosures and clarifications of existing disclosures are effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 2009. The adoption of this update did not have a material impact on the consolidated financial statements. Disclosures about purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements in the roll forward of activity on Level 3 fair value measurements is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2010 and for interim periods within those fiscal years.

In January 2010, the FASB issued update No. 2010-02, Consolidation (Topic 810): Accounting and Reporting for Decreases in Ownership of a Subsidiary – a Scope Clarification. The amendments in this update affect the accounting and reporting by an entity that experiences a decrease in ownership in a subsidiary, and expands the disclosures about the deconsolidation of a subsidiary or de-recognition of a group of assets within the scope of Topic 810-10. The amendments clarify, but do not necessarily change, the scope of current U.S. GAAP. The adoption of this amendment did not have a material impact on the consolidated financial statements.
In December 2009, the FASB issued update No. 2009-17, Consolidations (Topic 810): Improvements to Financial Reporting by Enterprises Involved with Variable Interest Entities. This update amends the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for Statements 167. In June 2009, the FASB amended authoritative guidance for the manner in which entities evaluate whether consolidation is required for VIEs. A company must first perform a qualitative analysis in determining whether it must consolidate a VIE, and if the qualitative analysis is not determinative, must perform a quantitative analysis. Further, the guidance requires that companies continually evaluate VIEs for consolidation, rather than assessing based upon the occurrence of triggering events, and also requires enhanced disclosures about how a company’s involvement with a VIE affects its financial statements and exposure to risks. The Company has adopted this update as of April 1, 2010 and it will not have any impact on the Company’s accounting for its VIE.

In October 2009, the FASB issued update No. 2009-13, Revenue Recognition (Topic 605): Multiple-Deliverable Revenue Arrangements – a consensus of the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force, which provides guidance for identifying separate deliverables in a revenue-generating transaction where multiple deliverables exist, and provides guidance for allocating and recognizing revenue based on those separate deliverables. The guidance is expected to result in more multiple deliverable arrangements being separable than under current guidance. This guidance is effective for the Company beginning on April 1, 2011 and is required to be applied prospectively to new or significantly modified arrangements. The Company will assess the impact this guidance may have on the consolidated financialfinancia l statements.
In August 2009, the FASB issued update No. 2009-05 - Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (Topic 820) - Measuring Liabilities at Fair Value.  The amendments in this update apply to all entities that measure liabilities at fair value within the scope of Topic 820. The update provides clarification that in circumstances where a quoted price in an active market for the identical liability is not available, a reporting entity is required to measure fair value using one or more of the following valuation techniques that uses the quoted price of the identical liability when traded as an asset, quoted prices for similar liabilities or similar liabilities when traded as assets, or a income or market approach consistent with the principles of Topic 820. The guidance is effective at October 1, 2009, and the adoption of this amendment did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In June 2009, the FASB issued update No. 2009-01 “Topic 105—Generally Accepted Accounting Principles—amendments based on—Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 168—TheFASB Accounting Standards Codification and the Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles.”  This Accounting Standards Update amends the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for the issuance of FASB Statement No. 168, “The The FASB Accounting Standards Codification and the Hierarchy of GAAP”GAAP. This Accounting Standards Update includes Statement 168 in its entirety, and establishes the Codification as the single source of authoritative U.S. GAAP recognized by the FASB to be applied by nongovernmental entities. SEC rules and interpretive releases are also sources of authoritative GAAP for SEC registrants. This guidance modifies the GAAP hierarchy to include only two levels of GAAP: authoritative and non-authoritative. The guidance was effective for the Company as of September 30, 2009, and did not impact the Company’s results of operations, cash flows or financial positions. The Company has adjusted historical GAAP references beginning in its second quarter 2009 Form 10-Q to reflect accounting guidance references included in the codification.
In June 2009, the FASB amended authoritative guidance for the manner in which entities evaluate whether consolidation is required for VIEs. A company must first perform a qualitative analysis in determining whether it must consolidate a VIE, and if the qualitative analysis is not determinative, must perform a quantitative analysis. Further, the guidance requires that companies continually evaluate VIEs for consolidation, rather than assessing based upon the occurrence of triggering events, and also requires enhanced disclosures about how a company’s involvement with a VIE affects its financial statements and exposure to risks. The guidance is effective  beginning April 1, 2010, and the Company is currently assessing the impact on the consolidated financial statements.

In May 2009, the FASB issued authoritative guidance to establish general standards of accounting for and disclosure of events that occur after the balance sheet date but before financial statements are issued or are available to be issued. In particular, this guidance  sets forth the period after the balance sheet date during which management of a reporting entity should evaluate events or transactions that may occur for potential recognition or disclosure in the financial statements; the circumstances under which an entity should recognize events or transactions occurring after the balance sheet date in its financial statements; and the disclosures that an entity should make about events or transactions that occurred after the balance sheet date. This guidance is effective for periods ending after June 15, 2009 and its adoption did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
 
 
-8--7-


 
In April 2009, the FASB issued guidance to require disclosure about fair value of financial instruments for interim reporting periods of publicly traded companies as well as in annual financial statements. Since this guidance provides only disclosure requirements, the adoption of this standard did not impact the results of operations, cash flows or financial positions.
In April 2009, the FASB amended authoritative guidance to determine fair value when the volume and level of activity for the asset or liability have significantly decreased and on identifying transactions that are not orderly. This guidance requires disclosure in interim and annual periods of inputs and valuation techniques used to measure fair value and a discussion of changes in valuation techniques.
The guidance was adopted for the period ended September 30, 2009. The adoption did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements or the fair value of its financial assets.
In April 2009, the FASB amended authoritative guidance related to the requirements for the recognition and measurement of other-than-temporary impairments for debt securities by modifying the pre-existing “intent and ability” indicator. Under this guidance, an other-than-temporary impairment is triggered when there is intent to sell the security, it is more likely than not that the security will be required to be sold before recovery, or the security is not expected to recover the entire amortized cost basis of the security. Additionally, this guidance changes the presentation of other-than-temporary impairment in the income statement for those impairments involving credit losses. The credit loss component will be recognized in earnings and the remainder of the impairment will be recorded in other comprehensive income. The guidance was adopted for the period ended September 30, 2009 and its adoption did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

NOTE 3 - PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT
 
As of SeptemberJune 30, 20092010 and March 31, 2009,2010, property, plant and equipment consisted of the following:
 
 
September 30, 2009
(unaudited)
  
March 31, 2009
(audited)
  June 30, 2010 March 31, 2010 
Land $110,113  $110,113  $110,113  $110,113 
Building and improvements  1,486,349   1,486,349   1,504,948   1,504,948 
Machinery equipment, furniture and fixtures  4,902,734   4,006,235   4,948,710   4,974,302 
Equipment under capital leases  56,242   56,242   56,242   56,242 
Total property, plant and equipment  6,555,438   5,658,939   6,620,013   6,645,605 
Less: accumulated depreciation  (3,095,008)  (2,985,505)  (3,350,444)  (3,295,662)
Total property, plant and equipment, net $3,460,430  $2,763,434  $3,269,569  $3,349,943 
 
Depreciation expense for the sixthree months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2010 and 2009 was $86,754 and 2008 was $199,503 and $267,296,$117,126, respectively. Land and buildings (which are owned by WM Realty, a consolidated entityVIE) are collateral for the $3,200,000 Amalgamated Bank Mortgage Loan described in greater detail under Note 6 Long-Term Debt. Other fixed assets of the Company together with its other personal properties, are collateral for the Sovereign Bank $4,000,000 secured loanterm note, capital expenditure note and revolving line of credit.

The Company has placed $887,279 of equipment into service during the six months ended September 30, 2009 that it had ordered in 2008 and received in January 2009.  
NOTE 4 - COSTS INCURRED ON UNCOMPLETED CONTRACTS
 
The Company recognizes revenues based upon the units-of-delivery method (see Note 2). The advance billing and deposits includeincludes down payments for acquisition of materials and progress payments on contracts. The agreements with the buyers of the Company’s products allow the Company to offset the progress payments against the costs incurred. The following table sets forth information as to costs incurred on uncompleted contracts as of SeptemberJune 30, 20092010 and March 31, 2009:2010:  
 
-9-

 
September 30, 2009
(unaudited)
 
March 31, 2009
(audited)
  
June 30,
2010
 
March 31,
2010
 
Cost incurred on uncompleted contracts, beginning balance $12,742,217  $10,633,862  $    5,149,663 $12,742,218 
Total cost incurred on contracts during the period  7,971,267   28,078,982      4,223,308  14,652,700 
Less cost of sales, during the period  (15,225,452)  (25,970,626)  (3,837,311  (22,245,255)
Cost incurred on uncompleted contracts, ending balance $5,488,032  $12,742,217  $   5,535,560 $5,149,663 
               
Billings on uncompleted contracts, beginning balance $9,081,416  $6,335,179  $    2,399,815 $9,081,416 
Plus: Total billings incurred on contracts, during the period  11,239,508   40,833,972       6,063,780  21,665,150 
Less: Contracts recognized as revenue, during the period  (18,436,025)  (38,087,735)  (6,153,502  (28,346,751)
Billings on uncompleted contracts, ending balance $1,884,898  $9,081,416  $   2,310,093 $2,399,815 
               
Cost incurred on uncompleted contracts, ending balance $5,488,032  $12,742,218  $  5,535,560 $5,149,663 
Billings on uncompleted contracts, ending balance  1,884.898   (9,081,416)    (2,310,093  (2,399,815)
Costs incurred on uncompleted contracts, in excess of progress billings $3,603,134  $3,660,802  $ 3,225,467 $2,749,848 
  
As of SeptemberJune 30, 20092010 and March 31, 2009,2010, the Company had deferred revenues totaling $1,777,472$60,957 and $3,945,364,$56,375, respectively. Deferred revenues represent the customer prepayments on their contracts. The cost incurred on uncompleted contracts in excess of progress billings on June 30, 2010 and March 31, 2010 are net of allowances for losses on uncompleted contracts of $40,499 and $172,413, respectively.
-8-


NOTE 5 - PREPAID EXPENSES
 
As of SeptemberJune 30, 20092010 and March 31, 2009,2010, the prepaid expenses included the following:
 
 
September 30, 2009
(unaudited)
  
March 31, 2009
(audited)
  June 30, 2010 March 31, 2010 
Prepayments on material purchases $               -  $1,418,510 
Insurance         99,170   140,237 
Prepaid insurance $96,255  $        128,927 
Prepayments for material purchases 32,486           19,638 
Other        65,077   24,487   15,167             11,289 
Total $    164,247  $1,583,234  $143,908  $        159,854 

NOTE 6 – LONG-TERM DEBT and CAPITAL LEASE OBLIGATIONSOBLIGATION

The following debt and capital lease obligations were outstanding on SeptemberJune 30, 20092010 and March 31, 2009:2010: 
 
 
September 30, 2009
(unaudited)
 
March 31, 2009
(audited)
  June 30, 2010 March 31, 2010 
Sovereign Bank Secured Term Note Payable $ 2,000,000   $  2,285,715 
Sovereign Bank Secured Term Note $1,571,429  $1,715,034 
Amalgamated Bank Mortgage Loan  3,099,464     3,118,747  3,068,530   3,078,764 
Capital expenditure note, other     919,297           1,098 
Capital Lease       37,160         43,711 
Sovereign Bank Capital expenditure note, other 796,723   842,687 
Sovereign Bank Staged advance note 556,416 556,416 
Obligations under capital leases  26,957   30,410 
Total long-term debt   6,055,921     5,449,271  6,020,055   6,223,3111 
Principal payments due within one year     (752,646)     (624,818)   (809,726)  (809,3099)
Principal payments due after one year $   5,303,275   $   4,824,453  $5,210,329  $5,414,002 
 
On February 24, 2006, Ranor entered into a loan and security agreement with Sovereign Bank.Bank (the “bank”).  Pursuant to the agreement, as amended, the bank provided Ranor with a secured term loan of $4,000,000 (“Term Note”) and also extended to Ranor a revolving line of credit of up $1,000,000 the (“Revolving$2,000,000 (the “Revolving Note”).  On January 29, 2007, the loan and security agreement was amended, adding a capital expenditure line of credit facility of $3,000,000 to the above two debt facilities the (“CapEx(the “CapEx Note”). On March 29, 2010, the bank agreed to extend to Ranor a loan facility (the “Staged Advance Note”) in the amount of up to $1,900,000 for the purpose of acquiring a gantry mill machine. Significant terms associated with the Sovereign debt facilities are summarized below.

Sovereign Bank Secured Term Note:

The Term Note issued on February 24, 2006 has a term of 7 years with an initial fixed interest rate of 9%.  The interest rate on the Term Note which converts from a fixed rate of 9% to a variable rate on February 28, 2011.  From February 28, 2011 until maturity the Term Notenote will bear interest at the Prime Rateprime rate plus 1.5%, payable on a quarterly basis.   Principal of $142,857, plus interest is payable in quarterly installments, of $142,857, plus interest, with a final payment due on March 1, 2013.

The Term Note is subject to various covenants that include the following: the loan collateral comprises all personal property of Ranor, including cash, accounts receivable inventories, equipment, financial and intangible assets.  The company must also maintain a ratio of earnings available to cover fixed charges of at least 120% of the fixed charges for the rolling four quarters, tested at the end of each fiscal quarter.  Additionally the Company must also maintain an interest coverage ratio of at least 2.12:1 at the end of each fiscal quarter. Ranor’s obligations under the notes to the bank are guaranteed by Techprecision. The company isTechPrecision.

As of June 30 2010 and March 31, 2010, the Company was in compliance with all debt covenants.  The ratio of earnings to cover fixed charges as of June 30, 2010 was 360% and the covenantsinterest coverage ratio for the three months then ended was 10:1.  In the event of default, the lending bank may choose to accelerate payment of any amounts outstanding under this agreement.  the Note and, under certain circumstances, the bank may be entitled to cancel the facility.  If the Company were unable to obtain a waiver for a breach of covenant and the bank accelerated the payment of any outstanding amounts, such acceleration may cause the Company’s cash position to deteriorate or, if cash on hand were insufficient to satisfy any payment due, may require the Company to obtain alternate financing to satisfy any accelerated payment obli gation.


-10-



Sovereign Bank Revolving Note:

The Revolving Note bears interest at a variable rate determined as the Prime Rate, plus 1.5% annually on any outstanding balance.   The borrowing amount underlimit on the Revolving Note has been limited to the sum of 70% of the Company’s eligible accounts receivable plus 40% of eligible inventory up to a maximum borrowing limit of $1,000,000.   The agreement has been amended several times with the effect of increasing the maximum available borrowing limit to $2,000,000 as of September 30, 2009.$2,000,000.   There were no borrowings outstanding under this facility as of SeptemberJune 30, 20092010 and 2008.March 31, 2010.  The Company pays an unused credit line fee of .25%0.25% on the average unused credit line amount in the previous month. The Company received notice from facility was renewed with the bank on July 30, 2010 and the maturity date was changed to July 31, 2011.
-9-


Sovereign Bank that this facility had been renewed in August 2009.

Capital Expenditure Note:

The initial borrowing limit under the Capital Expenditure Note was $500,000 and has been amended several times resulting in a borrowing limit of $3,000,000 available under the facility as of SeptemberNovember 30, 2009.  The facility iswas subject to renewal on an annual basis.  On November 30, 2009, the Company elected not to renew this facility when it terminated as the Company plans to finance any future equipment financing needs on a specific basis rather than under a blanket revolving line of credit. Under the facility, the Company maywas permitted to borrow 80% of the original purchase cost of qualifying capital equipment.  The current rate of interest rate is based on LIBOR plus 3%.  The Company is obligated to make interest only payments monthly on any borrowings through November 30, 2009 and on December 1, 2009 any outstanding borrowingsPrincipal and interest will bepayments are due and payable monthly based on a five year amortization schedule.  There was $919,297 borrowed$796,723 outst anding under this facility at SeptemberJune 30, 2009.   2010. 

Sovereign BankStaged Advance Note:

The Company usedbank may loan to Ranor, during a one year period expiring on March 29, 2011, amounts up to $1,900,000 for the proceedspurpose of acquiring a gantry mill machine. The machine will serve as collateral for the loan. The total aggregate amount of advances under this agreement should not exceed 80% of the actual purchase price of the gantry mill machine. All advances provide for a payment of interest only monthly through February 28, 2011, and thereafter no further borrowings will be permitted under this facility. The interest rate is LIBOR plus 4%. Beginning on April 1, 2011, Ranor is obligated to pay principal and interest sufficient to amortize the outstanding balance on a five year schedule. On March 29, 2010, Ranor drew down $556,416 under this facility to finance the initial deposit on the purchase of qualifying equipment during the six months ended  September 30, 2009.mill machine. TechPrecision has g uaranteed the payment and performance from and by Ranor.

Amalgamated Bank Mortgage Loan:

The mortgage loan is an obligation of WM Realty. The mortgage has a term of 10 years, maturing OctoberNovember 1, 2016, and carries an annual interest rate of 6.7%6.85% with monthly interest and principal payments of $20,955.  The amortization is based on a 30 year term. WM Realty has the right to repay the mortgage note upon payment of a prepayment premium of 5% of the amount prepaid if
the prepayment is made during the first two years, and declining to 1% of the amount prepaid if the prepayment is made during the ninth or tenth year.

In connection with the mortgage financing of the real estate owned by WM Realty, Mr. Andrew Levy, a director and principal shareholder, executed a limited guaranty.  Pursuant to the limited guaranty, Mr. Levy personally guaranteed the lender the payment of any loss resulting from WM Realty’s fraud or misrepresentation in connection with the loan documents, misapplication of rent and insurance proceeds, failure to pay taxes and other defaults resulting from his or WM Realty’s misconduct.
 
Capital Lease:

During 2007, the Company also leased certain office equipment under a non-cancelable capital lease. This lease will expire in 2012, and future minimum payments under this lease for annual periods ending on SeptemberJune 30, 20102011 and 2012 are $15,564 for 2011 - - $15,564, and $9,070 through April 2012.$12,970, respectively. Interest payments included in the above total $3,047$1,577 and the present value of all future minimum lease payments total $37,160.$26,957. Lease payments for capital lease obligations for the sixthree months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20092010 totaled $6,552.

As of September 30, 2009, the maturities of long-term debt and capital leases were as follows:

Year ending September 30,   
2010 $752,646 
2011  804,932 
2012  809,039 
2013  528,158 
2014  253,419 
Due after 2014  2,907,727 
Total $     6,055,921 
$3,891.

NOTE 7 – OPERATING LEASES
Ranor, Inc. has leased its manufacturing, warehouse and office facilities in Westminster (Westminster Lease), Massachusetts from WM Realty, a variable interest entity, for a term of 15 years, commencing February 24, 2006. For each six month period ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively the Company’s rent expense equaled $225,000. Since the Company consolidated the operations of WM Realty, the rental expense is eliminated in consolidation, the building is carried at cost and depreciation is expensed. The annual rent is subject to an annual increase based on the increase in the consumer price index.
-11-

The Company has an option to purchase the real property at fair value and an option to extend the term of the lease for two additional terms of five years, upon the same terms. The minimum rent payable for each option term will be the greater of (i) the minimum rent payable under the lease immediately prior to either the expiration date, or the expiration of the preceding option term, or (ii) the fair market rent for the leased premises.

The Company previously leased approximately 12,720 square feet of manufacturing space in Fitchburg, Massachusetts from an unaffiliated lessor. The rent expense for the Fitchburg facility was $0 and $28,342  for the six months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively.  The lease provided for rent at the annual rate of $50,112 with 3% annual increases, starting 2004. The lease expired in February 2009 and was not renewed.

On February 24, 2009, the Company entered into a lease for 2,089 square feet of office space in Centreville, Delaware.  The lease has a three-year term and provides for initial rent of $2,500 per month, escalating to $3,220 per month in year two and $3,395 per month in year three of the lease.  The Company has the option to renew this lease for a period of three years at the end of the lease term. During the six months ended September 30, 2009 the Company’s rent expense with respect to the Delaware property was $15,000.
Future minimum lease payments required under operating leases in the aggregate at September 30, 2009 totaled $5,679,195. The totals for each annual period ending on September 30 are: 2010 - $482,160, 2011 - $489,165, 2012 - $470,370, 2013 - $450,000, 2014-$450,000, and $3,337,500 for the years thereafter.
NOTE 8 - INCOME TAXES
 
For the three and six months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20092010 and 2008,2009, the Company recorded Federal and State income tax expense of $550,388$431,102 and $1,871,968, and $366,703 and $2,936,218,a tax benefit of $183,685, respectively. The estimated annual effective tax ratesrate for the sixthree months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2009 and September 30, 2008 were 30% and 42%, respectively.2010 was 38.25%. The difference between the provision for income taxes and the income tax determined by applying the statutory federal income tax rate of 34% and the State of Massachusetts income tax rate of 9.5% was due primarily to differences in the lives and methods used to depreciate and/or amortize our property and equipment, timing differences of expenses related compensated absences,deductions for domestic production activities, share based compensation, and net operating loss carryforwards, and operating losses that occurred during the period.carryforwards.  

AsThe Company accounts for income taxes under the provisions of SeptemberFASB ASC 740, Income Taxes.  Based on the weight of available evidence, the Company’s management has determined that it is more likely than not that the current deferred tax assets will be realized.  At June 30, 2009,2010, the Company recorded a deferred tax asset of $266,517. For the period ended June 30, 2010, the total decrease in the valuation allowance was $1,236.
-10-


At of June 30, 2010, the Company’s federal net operating loss carry-forward was approximately $1,780,714.$1.9 million. If not utilized, the federal net operating loss carry-forward of Ranor and TechprecisionTechPrecision will expire in 2025 and 2027, respectively. Furthermore, because of over fifty percent change in ownership as a consequence of the reverse acquisition in February 2006, as a result of the application of Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code, the amount of net operating loss carry forward used in any one year in the future is substantially limited.

At September 30, 2009 and March 31, 2009, the Company provided a full valuation allowance for its deferred tax assets. The Company believes sufficient uncertainty exists regarding the realization of the deferred tax assets.
NOTE 98 - RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

Sale and Lease Agreement and Intercompany Receivable
 
On February 24, 2006, WM Realty borrowed $3,300,000 to finance the purchase of Ranor’s real property. WM Realty purchased the real property for $3,000,000 and leased the property on which Ranor’s facilities are located pursuant to a net lease agreement. The property was appraised on October 31, 2005 at $4,750,000.  The Company advanced $226,808 to WM Realty to pay closing costs, which advance was repaid when WM Realty refinanced the mortgage in October 2006. WM Realty was formed solely for this purpose; its partners are stockholders of the Company. The Company considers WM Realty a variable interest entity as defined by the FASB, and therefore has consolidated its operations into the Company.
 
On October 4, 2006, WM Realty placed a new mortgage of $3.2 million on the property and the then existing mortgage of $3.1 million was paid off. The new mortgage has a term of ten years, bears interest at 6.75% per annum, and provides for monthly payments of principal and interest of $20,595$20,955 (See Note 6). In connection with the new mortgage, Andrew Levy, a director and principal shareholder, and the managing member of WM Realty, executed a limited guaranty.guarantee. pursuant to which Mr. Levy guaranteed the lender the payment of any loss resulting from WM Realty’s fraud or misrepresentation in connection with the loan documents, misapplication of rent and insurance proceeds, failure to pay taxes and other defaults resulting from his or WM Realty’s misconduct. 
 
The only assets of WM Realty available to settle its obligations are $49,542$51,007 of cash and real property acquired from Ranor, Inc. at a cost of $3,000,000 less $321,551$388,574 of accumulated depreciation.  The real property has a net carrying cost of $1,135,959$1,112,075 on Techprecision’sTechPrecision’s consolidated balance sheet. There is also a loan receivable due from a related party for $30,000. The only liability of WM Realty is the carrying amount of mortgage payable to Amalgamated Bank for $3,099,465.  

bank with the carrying cost of $3,068,529. Amalgamated Bank, the sole creditor of WM realty, has no recourse to the general credit of Techprecision.
-12-

TechPrecision.

Distribution to WM Realty Members
 
WM Realty had a deficit equity balance of $369,662$345,839 on SeptemberJune 30, 2009. During2010. For the three and six months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2010 and 2009, WM Realty had a net income of $64,060$35,965 and $64,060,$30,894, and capital distributions of $46,873$55,373 and $92,248.$45,375, respectively.

NOTE 109 - CAPITAL STOCK
 
Preferred Stock
 
The Company has 10,000,000 authorized shares of preferred stock and the board of directors has broad power to create one or more series of preferred stock and to designate the rights, preferences, privileges and limitation of the holders of such series. The board of directors has created one series of preferred stock - the seriesSeries A convertible preferred stock (“series A preferred stock”).Convertible Preferred Stock.

Each share of seriesSeries A preferred stockConvertible Preferred Stock was initially convertible into one share of common stock. As a result of the failure of the Company to meet the levels of earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization for the years ended March 31, 2006 and 2007, the conversion rate changed, and, at September 30,December 31, 2009, each share of seriesSeries A preferred stockConvertible Preferred Stock was convertible into 1.3072 shares of common stock, with an effective conversion price of $.2180.
In February 2006,$0.218.  Based on the current conversion ratio, there were 12,629,489 common shares underlying the Series A preferred stock (7,719,250 shares)Convertible Preferred Stock as of June 30, 2010 and warrants to purchase a total of 11,220,000 shares of common stock were issued pursuant to a securities purchase agreement dated February 24, 2006.  Contemporaneously with the securities purchase agreement, the Company entered into a registration rights agreement with the investor, pursuant to which it agreed to register the shares of common stock underlying the securities in accordance with a schedule. The registration statement was not declared effective in accordance with the original schedule, and the Company issued 33,212 shares of series A preferred stock to the investor as liquidated damages.March 31, 2010.

In addition to the conversion rights described above, the certificate of designation for the seriesSeries A preferred stockPreferred Stock provides that the holder of the seriesSeries A preferred stockPreferred Stock or its affiliates will not be entitled to convert the seriesSeries A preferred stockPreferred Stock into shares of common stock or exercise warrants to the extent that such conversion or exercise would result in beneficial ownership by the investor and its affiliates of more than 4.9% of the shares of common stock outstanding after such exercise or conversion. This provision cannot be amended.
 
The holders of the series A preferred stock have no voting rights. No dividends are payable with respect to the series A preferred stock and no dividends are payable on common stock while series A preferred stock is outstanding. The common stock will not be redeemed while preferred stock is outstanding.
 
Upon any liquidation the Company is required to pay $.285 for each share of Series A preferred stock. The payment will be made before any payment to holders of any junior securities and after payment to holders of securities that are senior to the series A preferred stock.
-11-


Under the terms of the purchase agreement, the investor has the right of first refusal in the event that the Company seeks to raise additional funds through a private placement of securities, other than exempt issuances. The percentage of shares that investorinvestors may acquire is based on the ratio of shares held by the investor plus the number of shares issuable upon conversion of series A preferred stock owned by the investor to the total of such shares.

On August 14, 2009, our Board adopted a resolution authorizingNo dividends are payable with respect to the Series A Preferred Stock and directing thatno dividends are payable on common stock while Series A Preferred Stock is outstanding. The common stock will not be redeemed while preferred stock is outstanding.
The holders of the designatedSeries A Preferred Stock have no voting rights. However, so long as any shares of Series A convertible Preferred Stock be increased from 9,000,000 to 9,890,980.

On August 14, 2009,are outstanding, the Company entered into a warrant exchange agreement pursuant to whichshall not, without the Company agreed to issue 3,395,472affirmative approval of the holders of 75% of the outstanding shares of Series A convertiblePreferred stock then outstanding, (a) alter or change adversely the powers, preferences or rights given to the Series A Preferred Stock, (b) authorize or create any class of stock ranking as to dividends or distribution of assets upon liquidation senior to or otherwise pari passu with the Series A Preferred Stock, or any of preferred stock possessing greater voting rights or the right to certain investors in exchange for warrants to purchase 9,320,000 shares of common stock. The warrants had initial exercise prices ranging from $0.57 to $0.86 per share. Asconvert at a result ofmore favorable price than the Company’s failure to meet the EBITDA per share targets for the years ended March 31, 2006 and 2007, the range of exercise prices per share of the warrants were reduced to $.44 to $.65. Effective September 11, 2009, the warrants were surrendered to the Company, the Company filed an amendment toSeries A Preferred stock, (c) amend its certificate of designation relating to its Series A convertible Preferred Stock to increaseincorporation or other charter documents in breach of any of the provisions hereof, (d) increa se the authorized number of designated shares of Series A convertiblePreferred stock, or (e) enter into any agreement with respect to the foregoing.

Upon any liquidation the Company is required to pay $0.285 for each share of Series A Preferred stock. The payment will be made before any payment to holders of any junior securities and after payment to holders of securities that are senior to the series A preferred stock, and the 3,595,472stock.
The Company had 9,661,482 shares of Series A preferred stock were issued pursuant to the terms of the warrant exchange agreement.  All warrants surrendered in connection with the warrant exchange were cancelled.

During the six months ended September 30, 2009, there were no conversions of series A preferred stock into shares of common stock.
The Company had 9,890,980 and 6,295,908 shares of series A preferredPreferred stock outstanding at SeptemberJune 30, 20092010 and March 31, 2009, respectively.
-13-

2010.

Common Stock andPurchase Warrants

The Company had 90,000,000 authorized common shares at September 30, 2009 and March 31, 2009 and had 13,930,846 and 13,907,513 shares of common stock outstanding at September 30, 2009 and March 31, 2009, respectively. The Company issued 23,333 shares of common stock in connection with the exercise of stock options on August 20 and September 30, 2009.

In February 2006, we issued to the investor warrants to purchase 11,220,000 shares of common stock in connection with its purchase of the series A preferred stock. These warrants are exercisable, in part or full, at any time from February 24, 2006 until February 24, 2011. If the shares of common stock are not registered pursuant to the Securities Act of 1933, the holders of the warrants have cashless exercise rights which will enable them to receive the value of the appreciation in the common stock through the issuance of additional shares of common stock. These warrants had initial exercise prices of $0.57 as to 5,610,000 shares and $0.855 as to 5,610,000 shares. As a result of the Company’s failure to meet the EBITDA per share targets for the years ended March 31, 2006 and 2007, the exercise prices per share of the warrants were reduced from $0.57 to $.43605 and from $0.855 to $.654075, respectively.
On September 1, 2007, the Company entered into a contract with an investor relations firma third party pursuant to which the Company issued three-year warrants to purchase 112,500 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $1.40 per share.   Using the Black-Scholes options pricing formula assuming a risk free rate of 5%, volatility of 28.5%, a term of three years, and the price of the common stock on September 1, 2007 of $0.285 per share, the value of the warrant was calculated at $0.0001 per share issuable upon exercise of the warrant, or a total of $11. Since the warrant permits the Company to deliverdelivery of unregistered shares, the Company has the control in settling the contract by issuing equity. The cost of warrants was added as additional paid in capital.
On August 14, 2009, the Company completed a transaction with two shareholders resulting in the issuance of 3,395,472 Series A preferred shares in exchange for the surrender of 9,320,000 warrants.   Subsequent to the exchange, all of the 9,320,000 warrants At June 30, 2010 and March 31, 2010, there were cancelled by the Company.

As of September 30, 2009, the Company had 112,500 warrants issued and outstanding and during the three month period ending September 30, 2009, 9,320,000 warrants were cancelled.outstanding.

Common Stock

The Company had 90,000,000 authorized common shares at June 30, 2010 and March 31, 2010, and there were 14,230,846 shares of common stock outstanding at June 30, 2010 and March 31, 2010.

NOTE 1110 - SHARE BASED COMPENSATION
 
In 2006, the directors adopted, and the stockholders approved, the 2006 long-term incentive plan (the “Plan”) covering 1,000,000 shares of common stock. The Plan provides for the grant of incentive and non-qualified options, stock grants, stock appreciation rights and other equity-based incentives to employees, including officers, and consultants. The Plan is to be administered by a committee of not less than two directors each of whom is to be an independent director. In the absence of a committee, the plan is administered by the board of directors. Independent directors are not eligible for discretionary options. Pursuant to the Plan, each newly elected independent director receivedwill receive at the time of his election, a five-year option to purchase 50,000 shares of common stock at the market price on the date of his or her election.e lection.  In addition, the plan provides for the annual grant of an option to purchase 5,000 shares of common stock on July 1st of each year, commencing July 1, 2009, with respect to directors in office in July 2006 and commencing on July 11st coincident with or following the third anniversary of the date of his or her first election.  These options are exercisable in installments.  Pursuant to the Plan, in July 2006, the Company granted non-qualified stock options to purchase an aggregate of 150,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $.285 per share, which was determined to be the fair market value on the date of grant, to the three independent directors.

On April 1, 2007, the Company granted options to purchase 211,660 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $.285 to the employees. The company shares did not trade in the market and had no intrinsicFair value at the date of grant.  It was not possible to reasonably estimate fair market value at their grant date, fair value, and thus according to SFAS 123(R) they were measured at intrinsic value.  

On October 1, 2008, the Company granted options to purchase 22,500 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $1.31 per share to its independent directors.  The options provided for vesting as follows: 13,500 were immediately vested on the date of grant and the remaining 9,000 options vest in two installments of 4,500 each on the first and second anniversary of the grant date.  The options are not covered under the plan.

On March 23, 2009, the Company entered into an employment agreement with the Company’s CFO, pursuant to which, he was granted an option to purchase 150,000 shares of common stock options at an exercise price of $0.49 per share, being the fair market value on the date of grant.  The options will vest in equal amounts of 50,000 over three years on the anniversary of the date of this agreement.  Pursuant to the terms of the employment agreement, the option exercise price was determined based upon the market price of the Company’s common stock as of the date of grant. Any future option grants will be in the sole discretion of the Board.

On July 1, 2009, the Company granted stock options to three directors to purchase 15,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $0.50 per share, pursuant to the plan provision following the third anniversary date of each director’s first election to the board. The shares were measured on the grant date and had a fair market value of $6,900.

The fair value wasis estimated using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model based on the closing stock prices at the grant date and the weighted average assumptions specific to the underlying options. Expected volatility assumptions are based on the historical volatility of our common stock. The risk-free interest rate was selected based upon yields of five year USU.S. Treasury issues. The expected life of the option was estimated at one half of the contractual term of the option and the vesting period. The assumptions utilized for option grants during the periods presented were 156% for volatility, 2.5% for the risk free interest rate, and five years for the expected life of the options.
-14-


At SeptemberJune 30, 2009, 440,8412010, 125,840 shares of common stock were available for grant under the Plan. No options were granted during the three months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009.
-12-


The following table summarizes information about our options which are fully vested, currently exercisable and expected to vest at September 30, 2009:for the most recent annual income statements presented: 

         Weighted Average
  Number Of  
Weighted
Average
  
Aggregate
Intrinsic
Remaining
Contractual Life
LKi\(
  Options  Exercise Price  Value(in years)
Outstanding at 3/31/2009  544,159  $0.384      
Granted  15,000   0.500      
Exercised  (23,333)   0.285  $   6,650  
Outstanding at 9/30/2009  535,826  $0.391  $280,720 4.51
Outstanding but not vested 9/30/2009  174,000  $0.533  $ 67,500 4.91
Exercisable and vested at 9/30/2009  361,826  $0.323  $214,220 4.32
  Number Of  
Weighted
Average
  
Aggregate
Intrinsic
 
Weighted Average Remaining
Contractual Life
  Options  Exercise Price  Value (in years)
Outstanding at 3/31/2010  850,827  $0.558       
Granted  --   --       
Outstanding at 6/30/2010  850,827  $0.558  $225,238  5.38
Outstanding but not vested 6/30/2010  199,500  $0.656  $31,000  8.37
Exercisable and vested at 6/30/2010  651,327  $0.528  $194,238  3.20
 
As of SeptemberJune 30, 20092010 there was $77,594$118,631 of total unrecognized compensation cost related to non vested stock options. These costs are expected to be recognized over the next three years. NoThe total fair value of shares fully vested during the six months ended September 30, 2009.quarter was $80,973.

NOTE 1211 - CONCENTRATION OF CREDIT RISK AND MAJOR CUSTOMERS
 
The Company maintains bank account balances, which, at times, may exceed insured limits. At September 30, 2009, there were receivable balances outstanding from three customers comprising 61.7% of the total receivables balance; the largest balance from a single customer represented 31% of our receivables balance, while the smallest balance from a single customer making up this group was 15%.  The Company has not experienced any losses with these accounts and believes that it is not exposed to any significant credit risk on cash.

At June 30, 2010, there were receivable balances outstanding from three customers comprising 70% of the total receivables balance; the largest balance from a single customer represented 52% of our receivables balance, while the smallest balance from a single customer making up this group was 7%.  The Company recorded bad debt expense of $234,999 in connection with a single customer who has failed to make any payments for goods purchased during the 2009 calendar year.  The Company is pursuing legal action to recover the balance due from this customer, however, it cannot be determined at this time if those legal collection efforts will be successful.
 
The Company has been dependent in each year on a small number of customers who generate a significant portion of our business, and these customers change from year to year. To the extent that the Company is unable to generate orders from new customers, it may have difficulty operating profitably. 
The following table sets forth information as to revenue derived from those customers who accounted for more than 10% of our revenue in the sixthree months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20092010 and 2008:2009:
 
   Six Months Ended September 30,
   2009  2008
Customer  Dollars  Percent  Dollars  Percent
 A  $9,735,412   53%  $16,440,122   65% 
 B   3,082,592   17%              3,684,978                    15% 
During April 2009, the Company’s largest customer, GT Solar, provided notice of its intent to cancel a majority of their open purchase orders reducing their total purchase commitment as of March 31, 2009 by approximately $16.8 million.  During the quarter ended September 30, 2009, the Company completed the sale of $8.9 million of inventory material to GT Solar as part of the cancellation.  As of September 30, 2009, the Company had remaining open purchase orders of $2.4 million from GT Solar, included in its backlog of $14.4 million.
   Three Months Ended June 30, 
   2010  2009 
Customer  Dollars  Percent  Dollars  Percent 
 A   $3,722,027                           60 %  $--   -- %
 B   $784,263                           13 %  $1,321,111   40 %
 C   $--                            -- %  $691,237   21 %
 D   $--                            -- %  $488,177   15 %

NOTE 12 – COMMITMENTS

Operating Leases

Ranor, Inc. has leased its manufacturing, warehouse and office facilities in Westminster (Westminster Lease), Massachusetts from WM Realty, a variable interest entity, for a term of 15 years, commencing February 24, 2006. For the three months ended on June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively the Company’s rent expense was $112,500. Since the Company consolidated the operations of WM Realty, a variable interest entity, the rental expense is eliminated in consolidation, the building is carried at cost and depreciation is expensed. The annual rent is subject to an annual increase based on the increase in the consumer price index.

The Company has an option to purchase the real property at fair value and an option to extend the term of the lease for two additional terms of five years, upon the same terms.  The minimum rent payable for each option term will be the greater of (i) the minimum rent payable under the lease immediately prior to either the expiration date, or the expiration of the preceding option term, or (ii) the fair market rent for the leased premises. The Company intends to exercise its purchase option under the lease during fiscal year 2011.  

On February 24, 2009, we entered into a lease for 2,089 square feet of office space in Centreville, Delaware.  The lease has a three-year term and provides for initial rent of $2,500 per month, escalating to $3,220 per month in year two and $3,395 per month in year three of the lease.  The Company has the option to renew this lease for a period of three years at the end of the lease term.

Future minimum lease payments required under operating leases in the aggregate, at June 30, 2010, totaled $66,504.  The totals for each annual period ended June 30 are:  2011 - $39,344 and 2012 - $27,160.
-13-


Employment Agreements

The Company has employment agreements with its executive officers. Such agreements, the terms of which expire at various times through February, 2012, provide for minimum salary levels, adjusted annually, as well as for incentive bonuses that are payable if specified company goals are attained. The aggregate commitment for future salaries at June 30, 2010, excluding bonuses was approximately $366,667.
NOTE 13 - EARNINGS PER SHARE (“EPS”)

Basic EPS is computed by dividing reported earnings available to stockholders by the weighted average shares outstanding. Diluted EPS also includes the effect of dilutive potential common shares. The following table provides a reconciliation of the numerators and denominators reflected in the basic and diluted earnings per share computations, as required.required under FASB ASC 260.

  June 30, 2010  June 30, 2009 
Net income (loss) $819,322   $(124,745) 
Weighted average shares  14,230,846   13,907,513 
Dilutive effect of convertible preferred stock, warrants and stock options  6,528,675   -- 
Diluted weighted average shares  20,759,521   13,907,513 
Basic income (loss) per share $0.06   $(0.01) 
Diluted income (loss) per share $0.04   $(0.01) 

During the three months ended June 30, 2010 there were 460,000 shares of potentially anti-dilutive stock options and convertible preferred stock.
 
NOTE 14 - SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
-15-

Agreement with Chief Executive Officer

On July 15, 2010, the Board of Directors, upon the recommendation of its nominating committee, appointed Mr. James S. Molinaro to serve as the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and as a director on the Board. Mr. Molinaro’s service as the Company’s Chief Executive Officer began on July 21, 2010 and will be governed by the terms of an offer letter executed by Mr. Molinaro and the Company dated July 15, 2010.  Pursuant to the Offer Letter, Mr. Molinaro will receive an annual base salary of $300,000 (subject to adjustment by the Board from time to time) and will be eligible to receive an annual performance bonus of up to 50% of his then-current base salary.  In addition to the compensation and severance arrangements described above, the Offer Letter contains customary provisions relating to confi dentiality and non-competition, and provides for the execution of an At-Will Employment, Confidential Information, Invention Assignment and Arbitration Agreement, which was executed by the Company and Mr. Molinaro on July 21, 2010.  The Company has filed a Form 8-K, dated July 15, 2010, that provides further detail on Mr. Molinaro’s employment terms.

On July 30, 2010, the Company amended its Revolving Note agreement with Sovereign Bank.  The amendment has the effect of extending the maturity date under this facility to July 31, 2011.  There are currently no amounts outstanding under the Revolving Note and there was no balance outstanding at June 30, 2010 or March 31, 2010 under the facility.

On August 4, 2010, the Board of Directors amended the Company’s 2006 Long-Term Incentive Plan to increase the maximum number of shares of common stock that may be issued under the Plan from 1,000,000 shares to an aggregate of 3,000,000 shares. In addition, effective August 4, 2010, the Company issued 1,000,000 incentive stock options under the Plan to its Chief Executive Officer and an additional 150,000 incentive stock options to its Chief Financial Officer. The Options have a per share exercise price of $0.70, the closing price per share of the Company’s common stock on the date of grant.  The options will vest in substantially equal annual installments on each of the first three anniversaries of the date of grant, and will expire on August 4, 2020. The treatment of the Options as “incentive stock options& #8221; under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is dependent upon receipt of shareholder approval within 12 months of the date of grant.  The Company expects to request such approval from its stockholders at the annual meeting of the Company’s stockholders to be held in the third fiscal quarter ending December 31, 2010. If shareholder approval is not obtained, the Options will be treated as non-qualified stock options under the Code.  The Company has filed a Form 8-K, dated August 4, 2010, that provides further detail on the stock option grants and amendment to the 2006 Long-Term Incentive Plan.
 
 
  Three months ended  Six months ended 
  September 30,  September 30, 
  2009  2008  2009  2008 
Basic EPS            
Net income $1,320,634  $2,476,100  $1,195,889  $4,047,796 
Weighted average number of shares outstanding  13,916,462   13,823,245   13,912,012   13,379,358 
Basic income per share $0.09  $0.18  $0.09  $0.30 
Diluted EPS                
Net income $1,337,902  $2,476,100  $1,213,157  $4,047,796 
Dilutive effect of stock options, warrants and preferred stock  7,383,687   13,155,085   6,018,226   13,357,320 
Diluted weighted average shares  21,300,150   26,978,330   19,930,238   26,736,678 
Diluted income (loss) per share $0.06  $0.09  $0.06  $0.15 


The following discussion of the results of our operations and financial condition should be read in conjunction with our financial statements and the related notes, which appear elsewhere.elsewhere in this annual report on Form 10K. This quarterlyannual report of on Form 10-Q, including this section entitled “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” may contain predictive or “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, statements that express our intentions, beliefs, expectations, strategies, predictions or any other statements relating to our future activities or other future events or conditions. These statements are based on current expectations, estimates and projections about our business based in part on assumptions made by management. These statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve risks, uncertainties and assumptions that are difficult to predict. Therefore, actual outcomes and results may, and probably will, differ materially from what is expressed or forecasted in the forward-looking statements due to numerous factors. Those factors include those risks discussed underin this Item 2 “Management’s Discussion and Analysis” in our Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2009 and this Item 2 in this Form 10-Q and those described in any other filings which we make with the SEC. In addition, such statements could be affected by risks and uncertainties related to the U.S. and global economies, to our ability to generate business on an on-going business, to obtain any required financing, to receive contract awards from the competitive bidding process, maintain standards to enable us to manufacture products to exacting specifications, enter new markets for our services, market and customer acceptance, our reliance on a small number of customers for a significant percentage of our business, competition, government regulations and requirements, pricing and development difficulties, our ability to make acquisitions and successfully integrate those acquisitions with our business, as well as general industry and market conditions and growth rates, and general economic conditions. We undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-lookingforward looking statements to reflect events or circumstances that may arise after the date of this report, except as required by applicable law.







Our contracts are generated both through negotiation with customersthe customer and from bids made pursuant to requestsa request for proposals.proposal. Our ability to receive contract awards is dependent upon the contracting party’s perception of such factors as our ability to perform on time, our history of performance, our financial condition and our ability to price our services competitively.  Although some of our contracts contemplate the manufacture of one or a limited number of units, we are seeking more long-term projects with a more predictable cost structure. DuringFor the sixthree months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2009,2010, our sales and net income were $18.4was $6.2 million and $1.2$0.8 million, as compared to sales of $25.3$3.3 million and a net incomeloss of $4.0 million,$124,475 for the sixthree months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2008.2009.  Our gross margin for the sixthree months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20092010 was 17%37.6% as compared to 33% in the six months ended September 30, 2008 as a result of lower sales volume.  Both net sales and gross margin declined in the six months ended September 30, 2009, and the global economic downturn continues to have an adverse impact on our customers.  In August 2009, we completed the transfer of inventory to GT Solar as part of their April 2009 cancellation.  Accordingly, our revenue17.0% for the three month and six month periodsmonths ended SeptemberJune 30, 2009, includes $8.9 millionreflecting increased sales volume and higher capacity utilization during the quarter ended June 30, 2010. A majority of revenue relatedthe increased sales and production volume during the first quarter of 2011 was attributed to materials transferred tonew orders from GT Solar, our largest customer as partwell as higher volumes of their order cancellation.   The inventory transfer included a heavy mix of raw materials and therefore carried a lower margin than we typically generate through the sale of finished products.business from several other customers. 











Recent disruptions inDuring the global capital markets have resulted in reduced availability of funding worldwide and a higher level of uncertainty experiencedquarter ended June 30, 2010, we benefited from renewed orders sourced by some end-user solar cell module manufacturers. As a result, our customers have made reductions in their direct labor workforce and reported decreases in their order backlogs as well as adjustments to the procurement of materials in their photovoltaic related production.  In April, 2009, GT Solar, our largest customer, cancelled the majority ofGT Solar which began placing new orders in January 2010, trailing their open purchase orders with us andsignificant order cancellation in August 2009 we completed the material transfer of $8.9 millionApril 2009.  Sales to GT, Solar during the quarter totaled $3.7 million as compared to finalizezero sales during the order cancellation.  Whilesame quarter in the prior year.  During the fourth quarter for the year ended March 31, 2010, we have openbegan to see signs of recovery within the solar sector in the form of new production orders and backlog withplaced by our largest customer, GT Solar they are notand a build up in our sales order backlog. During the three months ended June 30, 2010, our backlog increased from $21.5 million at comparable levels priorMarch 31, 2010 to the cancellation.$25.2 million as of June 30, 2010.  The June 30, 2010 backlog included $7.9 million in orders from GT Solar. The com parable backlog at June 30, 2009, excluding $11.7 million of non-recurring GT Solar orders, was $11 million.  


     Changes Three Months      Changes Three Months 
     Ended September 30,      Ended June 30, 
 2009 2008 2009 to 2008  2010 2009 2010 to 2009 
 Amount Percent Amount Percent Amount Percent  Amount Percent Amount Percent Amount Percent 
Net sales $    15,117 100% $13,601   100% $1,516 11% $6,154      100% $3,319           100%  $2,835     85%
Cost of sales      12,471 83%  8,588   63%  3,883 45%  3,838  62%  2,754              83%  1,084      39%
Gross profit        2,646 17%  5,013   37%  (2,367) (47)%  2,316 38%     565             17%  1,751   310%
                    
Payroll and related costs           331 2%  322   2%  9 3%     400  7%     393             12%  7       2%
Professional expense           111 1%  73   1%  38 53%     178  3%      76               2%  101    133%
Selling, general and administrative           227 2%  150   1%  77 51%     440   7%    298                9%  142       48%
Total operating expenses           669 4%  545   4%  124 23%      1,018 17%    768             23%  250      33%
                    
Income from operations        1,977 13%  4,468   33%  (2,491) (56)%
Interest expense, net          (102) (1)%  (115)  (1)%  13 11%
Finance costs              (4) 0%  (5)  0%  1 20%
Income (loss) from operations  1,298 21%    (203)               (6)%  1,501    739%
Interest expense    (108)   (2)%    (104)                (3)%  (4)       4%
Other income (expense)      60   1%        (1)                 --%  61      --%
Income before income taxes        1,871 12%  4,348   32%  (2,477) (57)%  1,250  20%     (308)               (9)%  1,558    506%
Provision for income taxes, net           550 4%  1,872   14%  (1,322) (71)%
Net income $      1,321 9%  2,476   18%  (1,155) (47)%
Income tax expense (benefit)     431     7%     (184)                (5)%  615      334%
Net income (loss) $   819  13% $   (124)                (4)%  $943     760%



Net sales increased by $1.5$2.8 million, or 11%85%, from $13.6to $6.2 million for the three months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20082010.  The increase included sales of $3.8 million to $15.1 million for the three months ended September 30, 2009.  Net sales included $8.9 million of materialalternative energy markets, offset in part by a reduction in sales to GT Solar thatour customers in the defense and medical device markets. Sales to alternative energy customers were triggered by that customer’s Aprilvirtually absent in the first quarter ended June 30, 2009 cancellationwhen our largest customer provided notice of its intent to cancel a majority of its open purchase orders.  This non-recurring material transfer represents 59.3% of the net sales for the quarter.orders reducing its total purchase commitment.

 
Cost of Sales and Gross Margin

Our cost of sales for the three months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20092010 increased by $3.9$1.1 million to $12.5$3.8 million, an increase of 45%or 39%, from $8.6$2.8 million for the three months ended September 30, 2008.comparative period in fiscal 2010. The increase in the cost of sales was principally due to the impact of higher manufacturing activity as a result of increased shipments to customers. Gross profit increased to $2.3 million or 38% of net sales from $0.6 million or 17% of net sales for the non-recurring transfer of inventory to GT Solar as part of its Aprilcomparative three month periods ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, order cancellation.respectively.  The declineincrease in gross profit margin was $2.4 million (47%) from $5.0$1.7 million, or 37%310%. Contributing to the increase in gross margin was a volume and mix of sales,projects that resulted in higher capacity utilization and increased processing-related revenue during the three monthsmonth period ended SeptemberJune 30, 2008 to $2.6 million or 17%2010.  In general, gross margins on t he Company’s processing services are higher than gross margins on the procurement of sales for the period ending September 30, 2009.  Contributing to the decline in gross margin were costs associated with underutilized capacity.  Further, the mix of completed projects and the lower margin inventory transfer resulted in an overall reduction in the gross margin for the quarter ended September 30, 2009 when compared against the same quarter in 2008.materials.

Operating Expenses
 
Our payroll and related costs within our selling and administrative costs were $331,302$400,011 for the three months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20092010 as compared to $322,035with $393,367 for the three months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2008.2009. The $9,267 (3%)$6,644 or 2% increase in payroll isand related costs was due primarily to an increase in payroll tax expense offset in part by a reduction in compensation when compared to the same three month period in the prior year.fiscal 2010.

Professional fees increased from $72,782to $177,650 for the three months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2008 to $110,4112010 from $76,212 for the three months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2009. This increase was primarily attributable to an increase in legal and accounting costs related to the August warrant exchange, contract reviewreviews and various SEC filing requirements.

Selling, administrative and other expenses for the three months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20092010 were $219,073  as$440,283 compared to $150,138$298,421 for three months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2008,2009, an increase of $68,935 or 46%.  Additional$141,862.  Primary components of the increase were additional expenditures related to the consulting feesexpenses in connection with our CEO search and insurance were the primary components of the increase.pending ISO 9000 certification effort, share-based compensation related to increased stock option vesting, investor relations, business travel and office operations.

Interest Expense
 
Interest expense for three months ended September 30, 2009 was $107,390 compared with $115,090increased by 3% for the three months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2008. The decrease of $7,700 (11%) is a result of lower principal balances of the Sovereign and Amalgamated bank loans outstanding in2010 to $107,567 compared with $104,162 for the three months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2009 as compareddue to higher average levels of long-term debt during the three months ended September 30, 2008.period.

Income Taxes

For the three months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2009 and 2008,2010, the Company recorded provisions for the Federal and State income tax expense of $550,388$431,102 compared with a recorded tax benefit for Federal and $1,871,968, respectively.state income tax of $183,685 in the comparable periods last year. The estimated annual effective income tax expense ratesrate for the three months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008 were 30% and 43% respectively.current fiscal year is 38.25%.  The difference between the provision for income taxes and the income tax determined by applying the statutory federal income tax rate of 34% was due primarily to differences in the lives and methods used to depreciate and/or amortize our property and equipment, timing differences of expenses related to compensated absences,share based compensation and the expected utilization of net operating loss carryforwards.

Net Income
 
As a result of the foregoing, our net income was $1.3 million$819,322 or $0.09$0.06 and $0.06$0.04 per share basic and diluted, respectively, for the three months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2009,2010, as compared to a net incomeloss of $2.5 million  $0.18 and $.0.09$124,745 or $0.01 per share basic and diluted respectively, for the three months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2008.
Results of Operations for the Six Months Ended September 30, 2009 and 20082009.

The following table sets forth information from our statements of operations for the six months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, in dollars and as a percentage of revenue (dollars in thousands):

        Changes Six Months 
        Ended September 30, 
  2009  2008  2009 to 2008 
  Amount  Percent  Amount  Percent  Amount  Percent 
Net sales $18,436   100% $25,259   100% $(6,823)  (27)%
Cost of sales  15,225   83%  16,866   67%  (1.641)  (10)%
Gross profit  3,211   17%  8,393   33%  (5,182)  (62)%
                         
Payroll and related costs  725   4%  757   3%  (32)  (4)%
Professional expense  187   2%  120   1%  67   55%
Selling, general and administrative  525   3   289   1   236   82%
Total operating expenses  1,437   8%  1,166   5%  271   23%
                         
Income from operations  1,774   10%  7,227   29%  (5,453)  (75)%
Interest expense, net  (203)  (1)%  (234   (1)%  30   13%
Finance costs             (8)  0%  (9)  0%  1   11%
Income before income taxes  1,563   9%  6,984   28%  (5,421)  (78)%
Provision for income taxes  (367)  (2)%  (2,936)  (12)%  (2,569)  (88)%
Net income $1,196   7% $4,048   16% $(2,852)  (70)%
 
Net Sales

Net sales decreased by $6.8 million, or 27%, from $25.2 million for the six months ended September 30, 2008 to $18.4 million for the six months ended September 30, 2009. A significant portion of the decrease resulted from decrease in sales to our largest customer, GT Solar.  Also, the global economic downturn adversely impacted our business during much of the first half of fiscal year 2010.

Cost of Sales and Gross Margin

Our cost of sales for the six months ended September 30, 2009 decreased by $1.6 million to $15.2 million, a decrease of 10%, from $16.9 million for six months ended September 30, 2008. The decrease in the cost of sales was principally due to the reduction in volume of sales. The decline in gross profit margin was $5.2 million (62%) from $8.4 million  or 33% of sales, during the six months ended September 30, 2008 to $3.2 or 17% of sales for the period ending September 30, 2009.  Contributing to the decline in gross margin were costs associated with underutilized capacity and the inventory transfer to GT Solar which included a high volume of raw material priced at a marginal mark-up to cost.

Operating Expenses
Our payroll and related costs were $724,669 for the six months ended September 30, 2009 as compared to $757,130 for the six months ended September 30, 2008. The $32,461 (4%) decrease in payroll is due primarily to a decline in bonus compensation compared to the prior year.
Professional fees increased from $120,469 for the six months ended September 30, 2008 to $164,713 for the six months ended September 30, 2009. This increase was primarily attributable to an increase in legal costs related to contract review and SEC filing requirements.
Selling, administrative and other expenses six months ended September 30, 2009 were $517,494 as compared to $289,134 for six months ended September 30, 2008, an increase of $44,244 or 37%.  Additional expenditures related to executive severance pay and travel were the primary reasons for the increase.

Interest Expense
Interest expense for the six months ended September 30, 2009 was $211,552 compared with $233,871 for the six months ended September 30, 2008. The decrease of $22,319 (10%) is a result of lower principal balances of the Sovereign and Amalgamated bank loans outstanding at September 30, 2009 as compared to September 30, 2008.

Income Taxes

For the six months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, the Company recorded provisions for Federal and State income tax expense of $366,703 and $2,936,218, respectively. The effective tax expense rates for the six months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008 were 30% and 42%, respectively. The difference between the provision for income taxes and the income tax determined by applying the statutory federal income tax rate of 34% was due primarily to differences in the lives and methods used to depreciate and/or amortize our property and equipment, timing differences of expenses related compensated absences, and the expected utilization of net operating loss carryforwards.

Net Income
As a result of the foregoing, our net income was $1.2 million or $0.09 and $0.06 per share basic and diluted, respectively for the six months ended September 30, 2009, as compared to net income of $4.0 million or $0.30 and $0.15 per share basic and diluted, respectively, for the six months ended September 30, 2008.
 
Liquidity and Capital Resources
 
At SeptemberJune 30, 2009,2010, we had working capital of $12.9$14.0 million as compared with working capital of $11.1$13.2 million at March 31, 2009,2010, an increase of $1.8$725,448 million or 16.1%5%. The following table sets forth information as to the principal changes in the components of our working capital (dollars in thousands).capital:

Category September 30, 2009 
March 31,
2009
 
Change
Amount
 Percentage Change 
(dollars in thousands) 
June 30,
2010
 
March 31,
2010
 
Change
Amount
 
Percentage
Change
 
Cash and cash equivalents  $9,537   $10,463      $(925)  (8.8) $9,591  $8,774  $817    9%
Accounts receivable, net  3,031   1,419   1,612   113.6   2,592   2,693   (101)    (4)%
Costs incurred on uncompleted contracts  3,603   3,661   58   (1.6)  3,225   2,750   475   17%
Raw material inventories  304   351   (47)  (13.5)  285   299   (14)    (5)%
Prepaid expenses  164   1,583   (1,419)  (89.6)
Other current assets  388   404   (16)   (10)%
Deferred tax asset  194   --   194   --   227   304   (77)   (25)%
Other receivables  30   60   (30)  (50.0)
Accounts payable  348   951   (603)  (63.4)  621   445   176   40%
Accrued expenses  541   710   (169)  (23.8)  513   621   (108)   (17)%
Accrued taxes  498   156   342   (219.2)  285   --   285   --%
Progress billings in excess of cost of uncompleted contracts  1,777   3,945   (2,168)  (54.9)  61   56      5    8%
Current maturity of long-term debt  752   625   127   (20.3)  810   809     1    3%

Cash used inprovided by operations was $1.4$1.0 million for the sixthree months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20092010 as compared with cash provided byused in operations of $7.4$0.9 million for the sixthree months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2008.2009. The decreaseincrease in cash flows from operations of $6.0 million wasis the net effectresult of a decreasesignificant increase in net profits, decreaseincome when compared to the same period in the last fiscal year. An increase in manufacturing activity also led to a higher balance of costs allocable to undelivered units incurred on uncompleted contractsprojects during the period. However, accounts receivable has decreased since March 31, 2010 reflecting an increase in collections during the period and providing higher cash balances. Also, accrued taxes payable recorded a higher amount because of a higher effective tax rate during the first quarter ended June 30, 2010.

We invested $7,146 in new equipment and received proceeds of $60,000 from the sale of equipment. On January 8, 2010, the Company issued a purchase order for the purchase of a gantry mill totaling $2.3 million. The Company has made a payment of accounts payable$762,260 and accrued expensesis committed to make two more payments during fiscal 2011, with final payment due upon delivery approximately one year from the six months ended September 30, 2009.purchase order date. The Company intends to borrow up to 80% of the purchase price in order to finance this purchase.  This purchase commitment represents an investment necessary to refresh and upgrade the Company’s fleet of manufacturing equipment and capabilities.

Net cash provided byused in financing activities was $521,041$258,629 for the six monthsperiod ended SeptemberJune 30, 20092010 as compared with net cash used in financing activities of $229,560$202,152 for the sixperiod ended June 30, 2009. We paid down $203,256 of principal on our debt and capital lease obligations during the three months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2008.  During2010, and our consolidated VIE WM Realty distributed $55,373 to its partners, an increase of $10,000 when compared to the sixsame quarterly period last year.      
All of the above activity resulted in a net increase in cash of $0.8 million for the three months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2009, the Company received $6,650 from the exercise of stock options, and we borrowed $919,296 under a line of credit facility in August 2009 to finance the purchase of new equipment placed into service during the last six months. We made principal payments of $285,714 on our loans from Sovereign Bank and principal payments of $6,552 on capital lease obligations.  In addition, WM Realty made principal payments on its mortgage of $19,161.  WM Realty also made capital distributions to its members of $92,256.    
During the six months ended September 30, 2009, the installation of equipment under construction has been fully completed, placed into service and was transferred to property, plant and equipment. For the six months ended September 30, 2008 we invested $9,220 in property, plant and equipment and paid a deposit on equipment of $150,000.  This deposit was credited to our purchase price in fiscal 2009 when the equipment was received.  
The net decrease in cash was $925,410 for the six months ended September 30, 20092010 compared with a $6.9$1.1 million increase in cash decrease for the sixthree months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2008.2009.

Debt Facilities

At SeptemberJune 30, 2009,2010, WM Realty had an outstanding mortgage of $3.1 million on the real property that it leases to Ranor. The mortgage has a term of ten years, maturing November 1, 2016, bears interest at 6.75%6.85% per annum, and provides for monthly payments of principal and interest of $20,955. The monthly payments are based on a thirty-year amortization schedule, with the unpaid principal being due in full at maturity. WM Realty has the right to prepay the mortgage note upon payment of a prepayment premium of 5% of the amount prepaid if the prepayment is made during the first two years, and declining to 1% of the amount prepaid if the prepayment is made during the ninth or tenth year.

Debt Facilities

 
We have a loan and security agreement with Sovereign Bank, dated February 24, 2006, pursuant to which we borrowed $4.0 million on a term loan basis in connection with our acquisition of Ranor. As a result of amendments to the loan and security agreement, we currently have a $2.0 million revolving credit facility, which is available untilwihch was renewed on July 30, 2010 for an additional one-year term.  At June 30, 2010.   We also have a $3.0 million capital expenditure facility which is available until November 30, 2009.  Pursuant to the terms of the capital expenditure facility we may request financing of capital equipment purchased through November 30, 2009, at which time any amounts borrowed2010 there were no borrowings under the line are to be amortized over a five year period. Pursuant torevolving note and maximum available under the agreement, Ranor is required to maintain a ratio of earnings available for fixed charges to fixed charges of at least 1.2 to 1, and an interest coverage ratio of 2 to 1. At September 30, 2009, we were in compliance with both of these ratios, with Ranor’s ratio of earnings available for fixed charges to fixed charges being 1.6 to 1 and Ranor’s interest coverage ratio, calculated on a rolling basis being 9.8 to 1.borrowing formula was $2.0 million.

The term note issued on February 24, 2006 has a term of 7seven years with an initial fixed interest rate of 9%.  The interest rate on the term note converts from a fixed rate of 9% to a variable rate on February 28, 2011.  From February 28, 2011 until maturity the term note will bear interest at the prime rate plus 1.5%, payable on a quarterly basis.   Principal is payable in quarterly installments of $142,857 plus interest, with a final payment due on March 1, 2013.

  The balance outstanding on the term note as of June 30, 2010 and March 31, 2010 was $1.5 million and $1.7 million, respectively.

The term noteTerm Note is subject to various covenants that include the following: the loan collateral comprises all personal property of Ranor,the Company, including cash, accounts receivable inventories, equipment, financial and intangible assets.  RanorThe company must also maintain a ratio of earnings available to cover fixed charges of at least 120% of the fixed charges for the rolling four quarters, tested at the end of each fiscal quarter.  Additionally Ranorthe Company must also maintain an interest coverage ratio of at least 2:12.1 at the end of each fiscal quarter. Ranor’s obligations under the notes to the bank are guaranteed by TechPrecision. At September

As of June 30, 2009, there were no borrowings under2010, the revolving note and the maximum available under the borrowing formulaCompany was $2.0 million. The Company is in compliance with all debt covenants as the ratio of earnings available to cover fixed charges was 360% and the debt covenants.    interest coverage ratio was 10:1 at June 30, 2010. In the event of default (which default may occur in connection with a non-waived breach), the lending bank may choose to accelerate payment of any amounts outstanding under the Term Note and, under certain circumstances, the bank may be entitled to cancel the facility.  If the Company were unable to obtain a waiver for a breach of covenant and the bank accelerated the payment of any outstanding amounts, such acceleration may cause the Company’s cash position to deteriorate or, if cash on hand were insufficient to satisfy any payment due, may require the Company to obtain alternate financing to satisfy any accelerated payment obligation.

Under theWe also had a $3.0 million capital expendituresexpenditure facility Ranor is able to borrow up to $3.0 millionwhich was available until November 30, 2009.   The capital expenditure facility was not renewed upon its expiration on November 30, 2009 as the Company intends to finance future equipment purchases on a specific item basis. We paypaid interest only on borrowings under the capital expenditures line until November 30, 2009, at which time the principal balance is amortized over five years, commencing December 31, 2009.  The interest on borrowings under the capital expenditure line is LIBORwas equal to the prime rate plus 0.5% through and including November 30, 2009 and thereafter at LIBOR, plus 3%, as the Company may elect..  Any unpaid balance on the capital expenditures facility is to be paid on November 30, 2014.  As of SeptemberJune 30, 2009, we borrowed $02010, there was $796,723 outstanding under th is facility.

Under a Staged Advance Facility the revolving linebank may loan to Ranor, during a one year period expiring on March 29, 2011, amounts up to $1,900,000 for the purpose of acquiring a gantry mill machine. The machine will serve as collateral for the loan. The total aggregate amount of advances under this agreement should not exceed 80% of the actual purchase price of the mill machine. All advances provide for payment of interest only monthly through February 28, 2011, and $919,297thereafter no further borrowings shall be permitted under this facility. The interest rate is LIBOR plus 4%. Beginning on April 1, 2011, Ranor is obligated to pay principal and interest sufficient to amortize the capital expenditure line.  The funds were usedoutstanding balance on a five year schedule. On March 29, 2010, Ranor drew down $556,416 under this facility to finance the purchase of the gantry mill machine. TechPr ecision has guaranteed the payment and performance from and by Ranor.
We believe that the $2.0 million revolving credit facility, which remained unused as of June 30, 2010 and was renewed on July 30, 2010, our capacity to access equipment specific financing, our current cash balance of $9.6 million, and our cash flow from operations should be sufficient to enable us to satisfy our cash requirements at least through the end of fiscal 2011. Nevertheless, it is possible that has been installed and placed in service duringwe may require additional funds to the quarter ended September 30, 2009.extent that we upgrade or expand our manufacturing facilities.

The securities purchase agreement pursuant to which we sold the seriesSeries A preferred stockConvertible Preferred Stock and warrants to Barron Partners provides Barron Partners with a right of first refusal on future equity financings, which may affect our ability to raise funds from other sources if the need arises.

We believe that the $2.0 million revolving credit facility, which remained unused as of September 30, 2009 and terminates in June 2010, and the $2.1 million capital expenditure facility and our cash flow from operations should be sufficient to enable us to satisfy our cash requirements at least through the end of fiscal 2010.  Nevertheless, it is possible that we may require additional funds to the extent that we expand our manufacturing facilities. In the event that we make an acquisition, we may require additional financing for the acquisition. However, we do not have any current plans for any acquisition, and we cannot give any assurance that we will complete any acquisition. We have no commitment from any party for additional funds;funds, however, the terms of our agreement with Barron Partners, particularly Barron Partners’ right of first refusal, may impair our ability to raise capital in the equity markets to the extent that potential investors would be reluctant to negotiate a financing when another party has a right to match the terms of the financing.
  
We have no off-balance sheet assets or liabilities.

Item 4T – CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES4.  Controls and Procedures

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

As of SeptemberJune 30, 2009,2010, we carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of management, including our interim chief executive officer and chief financial officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”)).

Disclosure controls and procedures are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in SEC rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed is accumulated and communicated to the issuer’s management, including its principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure

Based upon that evaluation, our interim chief executive officer and chief financial officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of SeptemberJune 30, 2009,2010, to ensureprovide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed by usthe Company in the reports that we filefiled or submitsubmitted under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange CommissionCommission’s rules and forms.forms and is accumulated and communicated to management, including our interim chief executive officer and chief financial officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

Changes in Internal Controls

There wasDuring the three months ended June 30, 2010, there were no changechanges in our internal control over financial reporting (as definedidentified in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)connection with the evaluation required by paragraph (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) that occurred during the quarter ended September 30, 2009Rule 13a-15 or Rule 15d-15 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

PART II: OTHER INFORMATION
Item 5.   Other Information
 
On July 30, 2010, the Company amended its Revolving Note agreement with Sovereign Bank.  The amendment has the effect of extending the maturity date under this facility to July 31, 2011.  There are currently no amounts outstanding under the Revolving Note and there was no balance outstanding at June 30, 2010 or March 31, 2010 under the facility.   A copy of the amendment will be filed as an exhibit to our quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending September 30, 2010.
Item 6 - EXHIBITS6.   Exhibits

(a)  Exhibits.

3.4Exhibit No.Amendment to Amended and Restated BylawsDescription
31.1Rule 13a-14(a) certification of the Company, dated September 14, 2009 (filed as Exhibit 3.1 to the current report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on September 18, 2009).*chief executive officer
3.531.2CertificateRule 13a-14(a) certification of Amendment to Certificate of Designation of Series A Convertible Preferred Stockchief financial officer
10.132.1Warrant Exchange Agreement, dated August 14, 2009, by and among the Company, Barron Partners LP, and GreenBridge Capital Partners IV, LLC (filed as Exhibit 103.1 to the current report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on August 20, 2009).*
31.1   Rule 13a-14(a) certification of chief executive officer
31.2   Rule 13a-14(a) certification of chief financial officer
32.1   Section 1350 certification of chief executive and chief financial officers

* = Incorporated by reference.


-23--22-


SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.


 
TECHPRECISION CORPORATION
(Registrant)
   
Dated:  November 12, 2009
August  13, 2010
By:/s/ Richard F. Fitzgerald                                               
  
Richard F. Fitzgerald
Chief Financial Officer
(duly authorized officer and principal financial officer)
 
 
-23-



EXHIBIT INDEX

Exhibit No.Description
31.1Rule 13a-14(a) certification of chief executive officer
31.2Rule 13a-14(a) certification of chief financial officer
32.1Section 1350 certification of chief executive and chief financial officers

 
 
 
-24-
 -24-