UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549


FORM 10-Q

 
xQUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
 
FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED APRIL 30,OCTOBER 31, 2010
 
or
 
¨TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
 
Commission File Number: 000-53718
 



CTM MEDIA HOLDINGS, INC.
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)

 
  
Delaware26-4831346
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification Number)
  
11 Largo Drive South, Stamford, Connecticut06907
(Address of principal executive offices)(Zip Code)
 
(203) 323-5161
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
 

 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  x     No   ¨
 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes ¨No  ¨
 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer   ¨
 
Accelerated filer   ¨
Non-accelerated filer   ¨ (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
Smaller reporting company   x
 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.):    Yes  ¨     No   x
 
As of June 14,December 13, 2010, the registrant had the following shares outstanding:

  
Class A common stock, $0.01 par value:1,106,468 shares outstanding (excluding 178,517 treasury shares)
Class B common stock, $0.01 par value:6,126,267 shares outstanding (excluding 794,128797,183 treasury shares)
Class C common stock, $0.01 par value:1,090,775 shares outstanding

 
1

 
 
CTM MEDIA HOLDINGS, INC.
 
TABLE OF CONTENTS
 
   
  
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
32
   
Item 1.
Financial Statements.
2
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of October 31, 2010 (unaudited) and July 31, 2010.2
Condensed Consolidated Statements (Unaudited)of Operations (unaudited) for the three months ended October 31, 2010 and 2009.3
   
 
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
3
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations
Cash Flows (unaudited) for the three months ended October 31, 2010 and 2009.
4
   
 
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
5
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(unaudited).
65
   
Item 2.
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
.
129
   
Item 3.
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures Aboutabout Market Risk
Risk.
2016
   
Item 4T.4.
Controls and Procedures
Procedures.
2016
   
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
2116
   
Item 1.
Legal Proceedings
Proceedings.
2116
   
Item 1A.
Risk Factors
Factors.
2116
   
Item 2.
Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
Proceeds.
2116
   
Item 3.
Defaults Upon Senior Securities
Securities.
2116
   
Item 4.
(Removed and Reserved
Reserved)
2116
   
Item 5.
Other Information
Information.
2117
   
Item 6.
Exhibits
Exhibits.
2217
  
SIGNATURES
2318
 
 
21

 
 
PART I.  FINANCIAL INFORMATION
 
Item 1.  Financial Statements (Unaudited)
 
CTM MEDIA HOLDINGS, INC.
 
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
      
(in thousands) April 30, 2010  
July 31,
2009
  October 31, 2010  July 31, 2010 
 (Unaudited)  (Note 1) 
Assets       (Unaudited)    
Current assets:            
Cash and cash equivalents $5,800  $6,480  $6,435  $6,516 
Short term investment  1,029   1,024   1,030   1,030 
Trade accounts receivable, net  2,504   3,908   3,514   3,496 
Inventory – finished goods  1,451   1,405 
Inventory – Finished goods
  1,585   1,462 
Prepaid expenses  864   982   904   965 
Assets of discontinued operations  2,224   2,350 
Note – receivable – current portion
  415   321 
Total current assets  13,872   16,149   13,883   13,790 
Property and equipment, net  2,109   2,392   2,061   2,013 
Licenses and other intangibles, net  27   89   9   17 
Note receivable – non-current portion
  2,325   2,400 
Other assets  181   159   181   181 
Total assets $16,189  $18,789  $18,459  $18,401 
Liabilities and equity (deficit)        
Liabilities and stockholders’ equity        
Current liabilities:                
Trade accounts payable $945   1,024  $1,112  $1,187 
Accrued expenses  2,288   2,050   1,499   1,539 
Deferred revenue  1,769   1,731   1,323   2,035 
Due to IDT Corporation     24,921   44   38 
Income tax payable
  822   770 
Dividends payable
  999   - 
Capital lease obligations—current portion  229   222   244   227 
Other current liabilities  480   563   440   646 
Total current liabilities  5,711   30,511   6,483   6,442 
Capital lease obligations—long-term portion  348   529   373   286 
Total liabilities  6,059   31,040   6,856   6,728 
Commitments and contingencies       
Equity (deficit):        
CTM Media Holdings, Inc. stockholders’ equity (deficit):        
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value; authorized shares—10,000; no shares issued      
Class A common stock, $0.01 par value; authorized shares—35,000; 1,285 shares issued and 1,106 shares outstanding at April 30, 2010  13    
Class B common stock, $0.01 par value; authorized shares—65,000; 6,920 shares issued and 6,126 shares outstanding at April 30, 2010  69    
Class C common stock, $0.01 par value; authorized shares—15,000; 1,091 shares issued and outstanding at April 30, 2010
  11    
Stockholders’ Equity:        
CTM Media Holdings, Inc. stockholders’ equity:        
Preferred stock, $.01 par value; authorized shares—10,000; no shares issued at October 31, 2010 and July 31, 2010      
Class A common stock, $0.01 par value; authorized shares—35,000; 1,285 shares issued and 1,106 shares outstanding at October 31, 2010 and July 31, 2010  13   13 
Class B common stock, $0.01 par value; authorized shares—65,000; 6,923 shares issued and 6,126 shares outstanding at October 31, 2010 and July 31, 2010  69   69 
Class C common stock, $0.01 par value; authorized shares—15,000; 1,091 shares issued and outstanding at October 31, 2010 and July 31, 2010  11   11 
Additional paid-in capital  58,936   33,141   57,662   58,548 
Treasury Stock, at cost, consisting of 179 shares of shares of Class A and 794 shares of Class B at April 30, 2010  (1,070)   
Treasury Stock, at cost, consisting of 179 shares of shares of Class A and 797 shares of class
B at October 31, 2010 and July 31, 2010
  (1,070)  (1,070)
Accumulated other comprehensive income  113   124   149   117 
Accumulated deficit  (48,744)  (47,483)  (45,526)  (46,235)
Total CTM Media Holdings, Inc. stockholders’ equity (deficit)  9,328   (14,218)
Noncontrolling interests  802   1,967 
Total equity (deficit)  10,130   (12,251)
Total liabilities and equity $16,189  $18,789 
Total CTM Media Holdings, Inc. stockholders’ equity  11,308   11,453 
Non-controlling interests
  295   220 
Total equity
  11,603   11,673 
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity
 $18,459  $18,401 
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
2

CTM MEDIA HOLDINGS, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Unaudited)
  
Three Months Ended
October 31,
 
(in thousands, except per share data) 2010  2009 
       
Revenues
 $8,649  $8,233 
Costs and expenses:        
Direct cost of revenues
  3,761   3,748 
Selling, general and administrative (i)
  3,814   3,183 
Depreciation and amortization
  171   228 
Bad debt
  46   3 
Total costs and expenses
  7,792   7,162 
Income from operations
  857   1,071 
Interest income (expense), net
  15     (18
Other expense, net
  (7)  (7)
Income from continuing operations before income taxes
  865   1,046 
Provision for income taxes
  (68)  (238)
Income from continuing operations
  797   808 
         
Discontinued operations, net of tax: (Note 2)        
Loss from discontinued operations
     (132)
Net Income
  797   676 
         
Less - net  income attributable to non-controlling interests
  (87)  (158)
Net income attributable to CTM Media Holdings, Inc.
 $710  $518 
         
Amounts Attributable to CTM Media Holdings, Inc. common stockholders:        
Income from continuing operations
  710   650 
Loss from discontinued operations
     (132)
Net income attributable to CTM Media Holdings, Inc.
  710   518 
Basic and diluted income (loss) per share  attributable to CTM Media Holdings, Inc. common stockholders:        
Income from continuing operations
 $0.08  $0.08 
Loss from discontinued operations
 $  $(0.02)
Net income per share
 $0.08  $0.06 
         
Weighted-average number of shares used in calculation of basic and diluted income per share:  8,323   7,848 
         
Dividend declared per common share:
 $0.12  $ 
         
 (i)  Stock-based compensation included in selling, general and administrative expenses 
 $112  $19 

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
 
 
3

 
 
CTM MEDIA HOLDINGS, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Unaudited)
  
Three Months Ended
April 30,
  
Nine Months Ended
April 30,
 
(in thousands, except per share data) 2010  2009  2010  2009 
             
Revenues $6,832  $6,805   21,431  $22,497 
Costs and expenses:                
Direct cost of revenues (exclusive of depreciation and amortization)  3,605   3,603   10,587   10,553 
Selling, general and administrative (i)  3,651   3,259   10,368   10,921 
Depreciation and amortization  197   213   653   772 
Bad debt  36   253   91   532 
Impairment and severance charges  -   72   -   32,124 
Total costs and expenses  7,489   7,400   21,699   54,902 
Loss from operations  (657)  (595)  (268)  (32,405)
Interest expense, net  (15)  (9)  (73)  (36)
Other (expense) income, net  (156)  4   (160)  7 
Loss from continuing operations before income taxes  (828)  (600)  (501)  (32,434)
Benefit from (provision for) income taxes  49   138   (74)  (19)
Loss from continuing operations  (779)  (462)  (575)  (32,453)
                 
Discontinued operations net of tax: (Note 2)                
Loss from discontinued operations  (316)  (1,333)  (570)  (1,745)
Net Loss  (1,095)  (1,795)  (1,145)  (34,198)
                 
Less - net (loss) income attributable to non-controlling interests  (36)  -   115   (737)
Net loss attributable to CTM Media Holdings, Inc.
  (1,059) $(1,795)  (1,260) $(33,461)
                 
Amounts Attributable to CTM Media Holdings common stockholders:                
Loss from continuing operations  (743)  (462)  (690)  (31,716)
Loss from discontinued operations  (316)  (1,333)  (570)  (1,745)
 
Net loss attributable to CTM Media Holdings, Inc.
  (1,059) $(1,795)  (1,260) $(33,461)

Basic and dilutive loss per share  attributable to CTM Media Holdings, Inc. common stockholders:            
Loss from continuing operations $(0.13) $(0.07) $(0.11) $(4.75)
Loss from discontinued operations $(0.05) $(0.20) $(0.09) $(0.26)
Net Loss $(0.18) $(0.27) $(0.20) $(5.01)
                 
Weighted-average number of shares used in calculation of basic and dilutive loss per share:  5,834   6,684   6,304   6,684 
                 
Dividend declared per common share: $0.25   -  $0.25   - 
(i) Stock-based compensation included in selling, general and administrative expenses
113-245(3)

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
4



CTM MEDIA HOLDINGS, INC.
 
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
 
Nine Months ended April 30,
(in thousands)
 2010  2009 
Three Months ended October 31,
(in thousands)
 2010  2009 
Operating activities            
Net loss $(1,145) $(34,198)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:        
Net income
 $797  $676 
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:        
Loss from discontinued operations  570   1,745      132 
Depreciation and amortization  653   772   171   228 
Provision for doubtful accounts receivable  91   532   46   3 
Impairment charges     31,466 
Stock-based compensation  245   (3)  112   19 
Change in assets and liabilities:                
Trade accounts receivable  1,184   538   (27)  1,360 
Inventory, prepaid and other assets  68   (682)  (84)  (139)
Trade accounts payable, accrued expenses, and other current liabilities  163   (135)  (263)  349 
Deferred revenue  41   (576)  (712)  (511)
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities  1,870   (541)
Investing activities        
Net cash provided by operating activities
  40   2,117 
Investing activities:        
Capital expenditures  (320)  (454)  (46)  (62)
Purchase of IDW noncontrolling interest  (414)   
Purchase of short-term investment     (1,018)
Net cash used in investing activities  (734)  (1,472)
Financing activities        
Dividend paid  (2,082)   
Repurchases of Class A and Class B common stock  (1,070)   
Distributions to holders of noncontrolling interests  (435)  (340)
Cash used in investing activities
  (46)  (62)
Financing activities:        
Distributions to holders of non controlling interests  (12)  (435)
Funding provided by IDT Corporation, net  2,372    1,122      2,107 
Repayments of capital lease obligations  (186)  (127)  (63)  (54)
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities  (1,401)  655   (75)  1,618 
Discontinued operations        
Discontinued operations:        
Net cash used in operating activities  (412)  (223)     (251)
Net cash used in investing activities  (3)        (3)
Net cash used in discontinued operations  (415)  (223)
Net cash provided by financing activities
     264 
Net cash provided by discontinued operations
     10 
                
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents  (680)  (1,581)
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents
  (81)  3,683 
                
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period  6,480   5,590   6,516   6,480 
                
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period $5,800  $4,009  $6,435  $10,163 
                
Supplemental schedule of non cash investing and financing activities                
Cash paid for interest $8  $10 
Purchases of property and equipment through capital lease obligations $-  $95  $166  $ 
Dividends payable $999  $ 

The effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents is not material.
 
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
 
 
54

 
 
CTM MEDIA HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
 
Note 1—Basis of Presentation
The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements of CTM Media Holdings, Inc. and its subsidiaries (the “Company” or “Holdings”) have been prepared by Management in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”) for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by U.S. GAAP for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting principally of normal recurring accruals) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. Operating results for the three and nine months ended April 30,October 31, 2010 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expectedexp ected for the fiscal year ending July 60;July 31, 2010.2011. The balance sheet at July 31, 20092010 has been derived from the Company’s audited financial statements at that date but does not include all of the information and footnotes required by U.S. GAAP for complete financial statements. For further information, please refer to the consolidated financial statements and footnotes thereto included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended July 31, 2009,2010, as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”).
 
The Company’s fiscal year ends on July 31 of each calendar year. Each reference below to a fiscal year refers to the fiscal year ending in the calendar year indicated (e.g., fiscal 20102011 refers to the fiscal year ending July 31, 2010)2011).

On August 1, 2009, the Company adopted the accounting standard relating to noncontrolling interests in consolidated financial statements (see Note 11).
The Company consistsHoldings is a holding company consisting of the following principal businesses:
 
 CTM Media Group (“CTM”), the Company’s brochure distribution company and other advertising-based product initiatives focused on small to medium sized businesses; and
 
 The Company’s majority interest in Idea and Design Works, LLC (“IDW”), which is a comic book and graphic novel publisher that creates and licenses intellectual property.
 
The CompanyHoldings was formerly a subsidiary of IDT Corporation (“IDT Corporation” or “IDT”) formed on May 8, 2009. On September 14, 2009, the CompanyHoldings was spun-off by IDT to its stockholders and became an independent public company (the “Spin-Off”). IDT transferred its ownership in all of the entities that became the Company’sHoldings’ consolidated subsidiaries to Holdings prior to the Spin-Off. The entities that became direct or indirect subsidiaries of the CompanyHoldings are: CTM; Beltway Acquisition Corporation; IDT Local Media, Inc. (which conducted certain operations related to CTM with only the Local Pull business currently still active) and IDT Internet Mobile Group, Inc. (“IIMG”). IIMG ownshad owned approximately 77%53% of the equity interests in IDW (see Note 10 forIDW. On November 5, 2009, the purchase ofCompany purchased an additional 23.33 5% interest in IDW).IDW for a purchase price of $0.4 million in cash. As a result of the transaction, the Company owns a 76.665% interest in IDW. The acquisition was accounted for in the second quarter of fiscal 2010, as an equity transaction, in accordance with the accounting standards on non-controlling interests.   All indebtedne ssindebtedness owed by any of these entities to IDT Corporation or its affiliates was converted into a capital contribution.contribution prior to the Spin-Off.  All references to the Company, its assets and results of operations for periods prior to the actual formation of the Company, refer to the subsidiaries of IDT that are now or were, owned by the Company, and their consolidated assets and results of operations.

The Company’sHoldings’ authorized capital stock currently consists of (a) 35 million shares of Class A common stock, (b) 65 million shares of Class B common stock, (c) 15 million shares of Class C common stock, and (d) 10 million shares of Preferred Stock. IDT Corporation completed the Spin-Off through a pro rata distribution of the Company’sHoldings common stock to IDT Corporation’s stockholders of record as of the close of business on August 3, 2009 (the “record date”). As a result of the Spin-Off, each of IDT Corporation’s stockholders received: (i) one share of the Company’sHoldings’ Class A common stock for every three shares of IDT Corporation’s common stock held on the record date; (ii) one share of the Company’sHoldings’ Class B common stock for every three shares of IDT Corporation’s Cla ssClass B common stock held on the record date; (iii) one share of the Company’sHoldings’ Class C common stock for every three shares of the IDT Corporation’s Class A common stock held on the record date; and (iv) cash from IDT Corporation in lieu of a fractional share of all classes of the Company’sHoldings’ common stock. On September 14, 2009, as a result of the Spin-Off, the CompanyHolding’s had 1.3 million shares of Class A common stock, 5.1 million shares of Class B common stock and 1.1 million shares of Class C common stock issued and outstanding.

On October 19, 2010, the Company’s Board of Directors passed resolutions to amend (the “Amendment”) the Company’s Second Restated Certificate of Incorporation to decrease the authorized number of shares of (i) Class A common stock from 35 million  shares to 6 million shares, (ii) Class B common stock from 65 million shares to 12 million shares, (iii) Class C common stock from 15 million shares to 2.5 million shares, and (iv) Preferred Stock from 10 million shares to 500,000 shares.  The Amendment was approved on November 12, 2010, by written consent of the holders of a majority of the shares of each class of the Company’s outstanding capital stock, holding shares of the Company’s common stock (which included 560,234 shares of Class A common stock, 3,573,472 shares of Class B common sto ck and 1,090,775 shares of Class C common stock which are convertible into shares of Class A common stock on a 1-for-1 basis), representing approximately 50.1%, 58%, and 100%, respectively of the combined voting power of the Company’s outstanding Class A, Class B and Class C common stock, as of October 29, 2010.  An Information Statement disclosing the Amendment and its approval was mailed to stockholders on or about November 29, 2010 and the Amendment will become effective on December 20, 2010, which is at least twenty days after mailing of the Information Statement.
5

Prior to the Spin-Off, IDT Corporation provided certain services to the entities that became Holdings’ consolidated subsidiaries. Holdings and IDT Corporation entered into a Master Services Agreement, dated September 14, 2009, pursuant to which IDT Corporation continues to provide to Holdings, among other things, certain administrative and other services. In addition, pursuant to the Master Services Agreement, IDT Corporation provides certain additional services to Holdings, on an interim basis. Such services include assistance with periodic reports required to be filed with the SEC, as well as maintaining minutes, books and records of meetings of the Board of Directors, Audit Committee and Compensation Committee, as well as assistance with corporate governance.  The cost of these additional services are not included in Holdings’ historical results of operations for the period prior to the Spin-Off, as they were not applicable for periods that Holdings was not a separate public company.

Note 2—Discontinued Operations
 
Sale of assets of WMET Radio

On May 5, 2010, the Company consummated the sale of substantially all of the assets used in the WMET radio station business (other than working capital) for. WMET 1160 AM is a radio station serving the Washington, D.C. metropolitan area.  The sale price offor the WMET assets was $4 million in a combination of cash and a promissory note of the buyer that is secured by the assets sold.  $1.3 million of the purchase price was paid in cash at the closing and the remainder will be paidis owed pursuant to a two-year promissory note, which is extendable in part to three years at the option of the buyer. The sale met the criteria to be reported as a discontinued operation in the third quarter of fiscal 2010 and accordingly, WMET’s results are classified as part of discontinued operations.operations during the fiscal year 2010.
 
Summary Financial Data of Discontinued Operations

6

Revenues (loss) incomeand loss (in millions) before income taxes and net (loss) income of WMET, which are included in discontinued operations, were as follows:
 
 
Three Months Ended
April 30,
 
  
Nine Months Ended
April 30,
 
  
Three Months Ended
October 31,
 
 
2010
 
  
2009
 
  
2010
 
  
2009
 
  2010  2009 
 (in thousands)       
Revenue
 $56  $286  $407  $894  $  $0.2 
Loss before income taxes and net loss .  (316)    (1,333)  (570)    (1,745)
Loss before income taxes and net loss      (0.1)

TheThere were no assets andor liabilities of WMET included in discontinued operations consistas of the following:
  April 30,2010  July 31, 2009 
  (in thousands) 
Assets      
Property, plant and equipment, net
  1,718   1,851 
Licenses and other intangibles, net
  499   499 
Other assets
  7   7 
         
Assets of discontinued operations
 $2,224  $2,357 
         
October 31, 2010 or July 31, 2010.
 

Note 3—Stock Repurchase and Cash Dividend

On November 17, 2009, the Company commenced a tender offer to purchase up to thirty percent of its outstanding common stock. The Company offered to purchase up to 0.4 million shares of its Class A common stock or any lesser number of Class A shares that stockholders properly tendered in the tender offer, and up to 2.4 million shares of its Class B common stock, or any lesser number of Class B shares that stockholders properly tendered in the tender offer, at a price per share of $1.10, for a maximum aggregate purchase price of $3.1 million.$1.10. The offer expired on December 22, 2009. As a result,2009 and pursuant to the offer, the Company repurchased 0.2 million shares of Class A common stock and 0.8 million shares of Class B common stock for an aggregate purchase price of $1.1 million, representing approximately 14% of its total outstanding capital stock at the t ime.time.
  
On Feb 23, 2010, theThe Company announced that its Board of Directors approved the payment ofpaid a cash dividend in the amount of $0.25 per share (approximately $2.1 million in the aggregate) which was paid, $0.06 per share (approximately $0.5 million in the aggregate), and $0.12 per share (approximately $1 million in the aggregate), on March 15, 2010, June 15, 2010 and November 9, 2010, respectively, to stockholders of record as of March 8, 2010, May 3, 2010 and November 1, 2010, respectively, of the Company’s Class A, Class B and Class C common stock.
 
On March 16,In addition, on October 19, 2010, the Company’sour Board of Directors in light of the Company’s significant cash position, the positive impact of the declaration and payment of the $0.25 per share dividend and the lack of near-term needs or opportunities for deployment of its cash, determined to declareapproved the payment of a cash dividend for the Company’s fourth quarterregular quarterly dividends in the amount of $0.06 per share, (approximately $0.5 million in the aggregate). The dividend, subject to confirmation by the Company’sour management that there is sufficient surplus as of the proposed future payment date,dates and other circumstances existing at the relevant times.

6


The declaration of any future dividend will be paid on or about June 15, 2010 to stockholders of record as of May 3, 2010at the discretion of the Company’s Class A common stock, Class B common stockBoard of Directors and Class C common stock.will depend on the Company’s financial condition, results of operations, capital requirements, business conditions and other factors, as well as a determination by the Company’s Board of Directors that dividends are in the best interest of the Company’s stockholders.

 
Note 4—Earnings Per Share
Basic earnings per share is computed by dividing net income (loss) attributable to all classes of common stockholders by the weighted average number of shares of all classes of common stock outstanding during the applicable period. Diluted earnings per share is computed in the same manner as basic earnings per share, except that the number of shares is increased to include non-vested restricted stock using the treasury stock method, unless the effect of such increase is anti-dilutive.
 
For the three and nine months ended April 30, 2009 and 2010, the diluted earnings per share equal basic earnings per share because the Company had losses from continuing operations and the impact of including non-vested restricted stock would have been anti-dilutive. Approximately 2.5 million and 0.8 million shares of non-vested restricted stock of at April 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively, have been excluded from the dilutive earnings per share computations because their inclusion would have been anti-dilutive. The earnings per share for the periods prior to the Spin-Off were calculated as if the number of shares outstanding at the Spin-Off were outstanding during those periods.
7

 
Note 5—Equity (deficit)

Changes in the components of stockholders’ equity (deficit) were as follows:
 

  
Nine Months Ended
April 30, 2010
 
 
  
Attributable to the company
  Noncontrolling Interests  
Total
 
 
  (in thousands) 
Balance, July 31, 2009
 $(14,218) $1,967  $(12,251)
             
Cash contribution and capitalization of balance due to IDT Corporation
  27,293      27,293 
Stock based compensation
  245      245 
Repurchases of common stock and Class B common stock   (1,070)     (1,070)
Partial acquisition of noncontrolling interest in IDW
  431   (845)  (414)
Cash dividend paid
  (2,082)     (2,082)
Cash distributions
     (435)  (435)
Comprehensive loss:            
        Other Comprehensive loss – foreign currency translation adjustments
  (11)     (11)
        Net (loss) income
  (1,260)  115   (1,145)
        Comprehensive (loss) income ((  (1,271)  115   (1,156)
             
Balance, April 30, 2010
 $9,328  $802  $10,130 

On August 1, 2009, the Company adopted the accounting standard relating to noncontrolling interests in consolidated financial statements (see Note 11).
  
Three Months Ended
October 31,2010
 
  Attributable to Holdings  Non-controlling Interests  Total 
  (in thousands) 
Balance, July 31, 2010 $11,453  $220  $11,673 
             
Stock based compensation  112      112 
Cash distributions
     (12)  (12)
Cash dividends
  (999)     (999)
Comprehensive income:            
     Net income
  710   87   797 
     Other comprehensive income
  32      32 
             
     Comprehensive income
  742   87   829 
             
Balance, October 31, 2010 $11,308  $295  $11,603 
 
As part of the Spin-Off, holders of restricted stock of IDT Corporation received, in respect of those restricted shares, one share of the Company’s Class A common stock for every three restricted shares of common stock of IDT Corporation that they owned as of the record date of the Spin-Off and one share of the Company’s Class B common stock for every three restricted shares of Class B common stock of IDT Corporation that they owned as of the record date of the Spin-Off. Those particular shares of the Company’s stock are restricted under the same terms as the corresponding IDT Corporation restricted shares in respect of which they were issued. Upon completion of the Spin-Off on September 14, 2009, there were 0.3 million shares of Class A unvested restricted stock and 0.5 million shares of Class B unvested restric ted stock.restricted s tock.

On October 14, 2009, the Company’s Board of Directors granted its Chairman and founder, Howard S. Jonas, 1.8 million restricted shares of the Company’s Class B common stock with a value of $1.25 million on the date of grant in lieu of a cash base salary for the next five years. The restricted shares will vest in equal thirds on each of October 14, 2011, October 14, 2012 and October 14, 2013. This arrangement does not impact Mr. Jonas’ cash compensation from the date of the Spin-Off through the pay period including the grant date. Total unrecognized compensation cost on the grant date was $1.25 million. The unrecognized compensation cost is expected to be recognized over the vesting period from October 14, 2009 through October 14, 2014. In the three and nine months ended April 30, 2010, the Company’s Stock-b ased compensation included in selling, general and administrative expenses was $0.1 million and $0.2 million, respectively. On September 3, 2009, the Company’s Compensation Committee ratified the Company’s 2009 Stock Option and Incentive Plan (the “Company’s Stock Option and Incentive Plan”), which was previously adopted by the Company’s Board of Directors and approved by IDT Corporation as itsthe Company’s sole stockholder, to provide incentives to executive officers, employees, directors and consultants of the Company and/or its subsidiaries. The maximum number of shares of the Company’s Class B common stock reserved for the grant of awards under the Company’s Stock Option and Incentive Plan is 383,020, subject to adjustment. Incentives available under the Company’s Stock Option and Incentive Plan may include stock options, stock appreciation rights, limited stock appreciation rights, restricted stock,sto ck, and deferred stock units.
 
Under the Company’s Stock Option and Incentive Plan, the option price of each option award shall not be less than one hundred percent of the fair market value of the Company’s Class B common stock on the date of grant. Each option agreement shall provide the exercise schedule for the option as determined by the Compensation Committee. The exercise period will be ten years from the date of the grant of the option unless otherwise determined by the Compensation Committee. No awards have been granted under the Company’s Stock Option and Incentive Plan to date.
 
 
87

 
 
On October 14, 2009, the Company’s Board of Directors granted its Chairman and founder, Howard S. Jonas, 1.8 million restricted shares of the Company’s Class B common stock with a value of $1.25 million on the date of grant in lieu of a cash base salary for the next five years. The restricted shares will vest in equal thirds on each of October 14, 2011, October 14, 2012 and October 14, 2013. Unvested shares would be forfeited if the Company’s terminates Mr. Jonas’ employment other than under circumstances where accelerated vesting applies. The shares are subject to adjustments or acceleration based on certain corporate transactions, changes in capitalization, or termination, death or disability of Mr. Jonas. If Mr. Jonas is terminated by the Company for cause, a pro rata portion of the shares would vest and the remainder would be forfeited. This arrangement did not impact Mr. Jonas’ cash compensation from the date of the Spin-Off through the pay period including the grant date. Total unrecognized compensation cost on the grant date was $1.25 million. The unrecognized compensation cost has been and is expected to continue to be recognized over the vesting period from October 14, 2009 through October 14, 2014.
The Company repurchased $1.1 million of its Class A and Class B common stock in the second quarter ended January 31, 2010 in connection with the tender offer that expired on December 22, 2009.
Note 6—Comprehensive LossIncome
 
Comprehensive income (loss) consists of net income (loss) and other gains and losses affecting equity that, under generally accepted accounting principles are excluded from net income. Changes in the components of other comprehensive income (loss) are described below.
 
  
Three Months Ended
April 30,
  
Nine Months Ended
April 30,
 
  2010  2009  2010  2009 
  (in thousands)  (in thousands) 
Net loss
 $(1,095) $(1,795) $(1,145) $(34,198)
Foreign currency translation adjustments
  (10)  (20)  (11)  (99)
Comprehensive loss
  (1,105)  (1,815)  (1,156)  (34,297)
Less: comprehensive (loss) income attributable to noncontrolling interests
  (36)  -   115   (737)
Comprehensive loss attributable to CTM Media Holdings, Inc.
 $(1,069)  (1,815) $(1,271) $(33,560)
  
Three Months Ended
October 31,
 
  2010  2009 
  (in thousands) 
 Net income $797  $676 
 Foreign currency translation adjustments  32   5 
 Comprehensive income  829   681 
 Comprehensive income attributable to non-controlling interests  (87)  (158)
 Comprehensive income attributable to CTM Media Holdings, Inc. $742  $523 

 
Note 7—Business Segment Information
 
The Company has the following two reportable business segments: CTM and IDW. CTM consists of ourthe Company’s brochure distribution company and other advertising-based new product initiatives focused on small to medium sized businesses. IDW is a comic book and graphic novel publisher that creates and licenses original intellectual property.

The Company’s reportable segments are distinguished by types of service, customers and methods used to provide their services. The operating results of these business segments are regularly reviewed by the Company’s chief operating decision maker.
 
The accounting policies of the segments are the same as the accounting policies of the Company as a whole. The Company evaluates the performance of its business segments based primarily on operating income (loss).income. There are no other significant asymmetrical allocations to segments.
 
Operating results for the business segments of the Company are as follows:
 
(in thousands) CTM  IDW  Total 
Three months ended April 30, 2010         
Revenues $4,051  $2,781  $6,832 
Operating loss  (343)  (314)  (657)
Depreciation and amortization  186   11   197 
Total assets at April 30, 2010 (i)  7,269   6,584   16,189 
Three months ended April 30, 2009            
Revenues $3,877  $2,928  $6,805 
Operating income(loss)  (906)  311   (595)
Depreciation and amortization  181   32   213 
Impairment and severance charges  72   -   72 
Total assets at April 30, 2009 (i)  7,187   5,705   15,778 
Nine months ended April 30, 2010            
Revenues $12,890  $8,541  $21,431 
Operating income (loss)  44   (312)  (268)
Depreciation and amortization  586   67   653 
Nine months ended April 30, 2009            
Revenues $14,244  $8,253  $22,497 
Operating loss  (31,098)  (1,307)  (32,405)
Depreciation and amortization  589   183   772 
Impairment and severance charges  30,300   1,824   32,124 
(in thousands) CTM  IDW  Total 
Three months ended October 31, 2010         
Revenues
 $5,029  $3,620  $8,649 
Operating income
  495   362   857 
Depreciation and amortization
  159   12   171 
Total assets at October 31, 2010
 $17,522  $937  $18,459 
Three months ended October 31, 2009 (i)
            
Revenues
 $4,915  $3,318  $8,233 
Operating income
  763   308   1,071 
Depreciation and amortization
  197   31   228 
Total assets at October 31, 2009
 $11,556  $6,537  $18,093 

(i)  The Total column includes assets of WMET
              (i) Amounts for 2009 exclude assets and discontinued operations of WMET.
 
 
98

 

Note 8—Related Party TransactionProvision for Income Taxes

PriorProvision for income taxes for the three months ended October 31, 2010 and 2009 was $68,000 and $238,000 respectively.  The decrease is due to the Spin-Off, IDT Corporation,reduction in the Company’s former parent company, chargedprovisions for federal, state and foreign income taxes.  The reduction in the Companyprovision for certain transactionsfederal and allocated routine expenses based on company specific itemsstate income taxes amounts to $120,000 and is related to the entitiesutilization of tax benefits that became the Company’s consolidated subsidiaries.were created in periods subsequent to October 31, 2009.  The Companyreduction in foreign tax expense amounts to $50,000 and IDT Corporation entered into a Master Services Agreement, dated September 14, 2009, pursuant to which IDT Corporation will continue to provideis proportional to the Company, among other things, certain administrative and other services. In addition, pursuant to the Master Services Agreement, IDT Corporation will provide certain additional services to the Company, on an interim basis. Such services include assistance with periodic reports required to be filed with the SEC, as well as maintaining minutes, books and records of meetings of the Board of Directors, Audi t Committee and Compensation Committee, as well as assistance with corporate governance. The cost of these additional services are not includedreduction in foreign earnings in the Company’s historical results of operations for the period prior to the Spin-Off, as they were not applicable for periods that the Company was not a separate public company. In the three and nine months ended April 30, 2010, the Company’s selling, general and administrative expenses were $0.2 million and $1.1 million, respectively, for all services and allocated expenses charged by IDT Corporation to the Company. In the three and nine months ended April 30, 2009, the Company’s selling, general and administrative expenses were $0.8 million and $3.6 million, respectively, for all services and allocated expenses charged by IDT Corporation to the Company.corresponding periods. 
In September 2009, IDT Corporation funded the Company with an additional $2.0 million in cash in advance of the Spin-Off.  Also on September 14, 2009, the aggregate of approximately $27.3 million of the amount due to IDT Corporation was converted into a capital contribution. At April 30, 2010, other current liabilities included $0.1 million due to IDT Corporation.
IDT Corporation and the Company entered into a Tax Separation Agreement, dated as of September 14, 2009, to provide for certain tax matters including the assignment of responsibility for the preparation and filing of tax returns, the payment of and indemnification for taxes, entitlement to tax refunds and the prosecution and defense of any tax controversies. Pursuant to this agreement, IDT Corporation must indemnify the Company from all liability for taxes of the Company and its subsidiaries for periods ending on or before September 14, 2009, and the Company must indemnify IDT Corporation from all liability for taxes of the Company and its subsidiaries accruing after September 14, 2009. Also, for periods ending on or before September 14, 2009, IDT Corporation has the right to control the conduct of any audit, examination or other proceeding brought by a taxing authority. The Company has the right to participate jointly in any proceeding that may affect its tax liability unless IDT Corporation has indemnified the Company. Finally, the Company and its subsidiaries agreed not to carry back any net operating losses, capital losses or credits for any taxable period ending after September 14, 2009 to a taxable period ending on or before September 14, 2009 unless required by applicable law, in which case any refund of taxes attributable to such carry back shall be for the account of IDT Corporation.
 
Note 9 – Impairment and Severance ChargesTender Offer
 
In the second quarter of fiscal 2009, the following events and circumstances indicated that the fair value of certain of the Company’s reporting units may be below their carrying value: (1) a significant adverse change in the business climate, (2) operating losses of reporting units, and (3) significant revisions to internal forecasts. The Company measured the fair value of its reporting units by discounting their estimated future cash flows using an appropriate discount rate. The carrying value including goodwill of CTM and IDW exceeded their estimated fair values; therefore, additional steps were performed for these reporting units to determine whether an impairment of goodwill was required. As a result of this analysis, in the nine months ended April 30,On November 17, 2009, the Company recorded goodwill impairmentcommenced a tender offer to purchase up to thirty percent of $29.7its outstanding common stock. The Company concluded the tender offer and repurchased 0.2 million in C TMshares of Class A common stock and $1.80.8 million in IDW, which reducedshares of Class B common stock for an aggregate purchase price of $1.1 million, representing approximately 14% of its total outstanding capital stock at the carrying amount of the goodwill in each of these reporting units to zero.time.
 
In the three and nine months ended April 30, 2009, the Company recorded restructuring charges of $0.1 million and $0.7 million, respectively, consisting primarily of severance related to a company-wide cost savings program and reduction in force.
 
Note 10 – Acquisitions
Purchase of NoncontrollingNon-Controlling Interests in IDW
 
On November 5, 2009, the Company purchased an additional 23.335% interest in IDW for a purchase price of $0.4 million in cash. As a result of the transaction, the Company owns a 76.665% interest in IDW. The acquisition was was accounted for in the second quarter of fiscal 2010 as an equity transaction, in accordance with the accounting standards on noncontrollingnon-controlling interests.  The Company acquired the additional interests as it determined that the purchase price was reasonable as well as to reduce the number of noncontrolling interest holders in this business.
 
Note 11— Recently Adopted Accounting Standards and Recently Issued Accounting Standards Not Yet Adopted
In September 2009, the Company adopted changes issued by theThe Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) periodically issues new accounting standards in a continuing effort to improve standards of financial accounting and reporting. We have reviewed the recently issued pronouncements and concluded that no new standards were issued this quarter that applied to the authoritative hierarchy of U.S. GAAP. These changes establish the FASB Accounting Standards Codification™ (the “Codification”) as the source of authoritative U.S. GAAP for all non-governmental entities. Rules and interpretive releases of the SEC under authority of federal securities laws are also sources of authoritative U.S. GAAP for SEC registrants. The Codification did not change or alter existing U.S. GAAP. The adoption of these changes had no impact on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
10

On August 1, 2009, the Company adopted the accounting standard relating to noncontrolling interests in consolidated financial statements. This standard clarifies that a noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary, which was previously referred to as a minority interest, is an ownership interest in the consolidated entity that should be reported as equity in the consolidated financial statements. Also, this standard requires consolidated net income (loss) to include the amounts attributable to both the parent and the noncontrolling interest, and it requires disclosure of the amounts of net income (loss) attributable to the parent and to the noncontrolling interest. Finally, this standard requires increases and decreases in the noncontrolling ownership interest amount to be accounted for as equity transactions, and the gain or loss on the deconsolidation of a subsidiary will be measured using the fair value of any noncontrolling equity investment rather than the carrying amount of the retained investment. As required by this standard, the Company retrospectively changed the classification and presentation of noncontrolling interests in its financial statements for all prior periods. The adoption of this standard did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows. In January 2010, the FASB amended the accounting standard relating to noncontrolling interests in consolidated financial statements (1) to address implementation issues related to the changes in ownership provisions of the standard and (2) to expand the disclosures about the deconsolidation of a subsidiary or de-recognition of a group of assets within the scope of the standard. These amendments were effective for the Company when they were issued by the FASB. The adoption of the amendments to this standard did not hav e a material impact on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
In June 2009, the FASB issued changes to the accounting for transfers of financial assets. These changes include (a) eliminating the concept of a qualifying special-purpose entity (“QSPE”), (b) clarifying and amending the de-recognition criteria for a transfer to be accounted for as a sale, (c) amending and clarifying the unit of account eligible for sale accounting, and (d) requiring that a transferor initially measure at fair value and recognize all assets obtained and liabilities incurred as a result of a transfer of an entire financial asset or group of financial assets accounted for as a sale. Additionally, on and after the effective date, existing QSPEs must be evaluated for consolidation by reporting entities in accordance with the applicable consolidation guidance. These changes also require enhanced disclosures about, among other things, (a) a transferor’s continuing involvement with transfers of financial assets accounted for as sales, (b) the risks inherent in the transferred financial assets that have been retained, and (c) the nature and financial effect of restrictions on the transferor’s assets that continue to be reported in the statement of financial position. The Company is required to adopt these changes on August 1, 2010. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of these changes on its consolidated financial statements.
In June 2009, the FASB issued changes to the consolidation guidance applicable to a variable interest entity (“VIE”) including amending the guidance governing the determination of whether an enterprise is the primary beneficiary of a VIE, and is, therefore, required to consolidate an entity, by requiring a qualitative analysis rather than a quantitative analysis. The qualitative analysis will include, among other things, consideration of who has the power to direct the activities of the entity that most significantly impact the entity’s economic performance and who has the obligation to absorb losses or the right to receive benefits of the VIE that could potentially be significant to the VIE. The changes also require continuous reassessments of whether an enterprise is the primary beneficiary of a VIE and enhance d disclosures about an enterprise’s involvement with a VIE. The Company is required to adopt these changes on August 1, 2010. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of these changes on its consolidated financial statements.Company.
 
In January 2010, the FASB amendedissued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2010-06, “Improving Disclosures about Fair Value Measurements” (“ASU 2010-06”), which is included in the accounting standard relating to fair value measurements primarily to improve the disclosures about fair value measurements in financial statements. The main provisions of the amendment requireASC Topic 820 (Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures). ASU 2010-06 requires new disclosures about (a)on the amount and reason for transfers in and out of the three levels of theLevel 1 and 2 fair value hierarchymeasurements.  ASU 2010-06 also requires disclosure of activities, including purchases, sales, issuances, and (b) activitysettlements within the Level 3 of the hierarchy. In addition, the amendment clarifies existing disclosures about (1) the level of disaggregation of fair value measurements (2)and clarifies existing disclosure requirements on levels of disaggregation and disclosures about inputs and valuation techniquestechniques.  Except for otherwise provided, ASU 2010-06 is effective for interim and inputs usedannual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2009. The adoption of this standa rd did not have a material effect on the Company’s financial statements.

In February 2010, the FASB issued ASU No. 2010-09, “Amendments to measure fair value,Certain Recognition and (3) postretirement benefit plan assets. The Company wasDisclosure Requirements” (“ASU 2010-09”), which is included in ASC Topic 855 (Subsequent Events).  ASU 2010-09 clarifies that an SEC filer is required to adopt these changes to its disclosures about fair value measurements on February 1, 2010, except for certainevaluate subsequent events through the date that the financial statements are issued.  ASU 2010-09 was effective upon the issuance of the disclosures about the activity within Level 3, which are required to be adopted on August 1, 2011. The Company doesfinal update and did not expect the adoption of these changes to its disclosures about fair value measurements to have anany impact on itsthe Company’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows.statements.
 
11

Note 12—Subsequent events

The Company completed a review and analysis of all events that occurred after the balance sheet date to determine if any such events must be reported and has determined that there are no subsequent events to be disclosed.
Item 2.   Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of OperationsOperations.
 
The following information should be read in conjunction with the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements and the associated notes thereto of this Quarterly Report, on Form 10-Q,and the audited consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto and our Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations contained in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended July 31, 2009,2010, as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”).SEC.
 
In accordance with Item 10(f)10-(f)(2)(ii) of Regulation S-K, we qualify as a “smaller reporting company” because our public float was below $75 million, calculated based on the actual share price on January 31, 2010, the September 14, 2009 Spin-Off datelast business day of its second fiscal quarter, and the aggregate number of shares distributed to non-affiliates. We therefore followed the disclosure requirements of Regulation S-K applicable to smaller reporting companies in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.
 
As used below, unless the context otherwise requires, the terms “the Company,” “Holdings,” “we,” “us,” and “our” refer to CTM Media Holdings, Inc., a Delaware corporation, and our subsidiaries.
 
9

Forward-Looking Statements
 
This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements. Statements that are not historical facts are forward-looking statements, within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, including statements that contain the words “believes,” “anticipates,” “expects,” “plans,” “intends,” and similar words and phrases. Thesesuch forward-looking statements are subjectstatements made pursuant to the Safe Harbor Provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Examples of forward-looking statements include:

•   statements about Holdings’ and its divisions’ future performance;
•   projections of Holdings’ and its divisions’ results of operations or financial condition; and
•   statements regarding Holdings’ plans, objectives or goals, including those relating to its strategies, initiatives, competition, acquisitions, dispositions and/or its products.

Words such as “believe,” “anticipate,” “plan,” “expect,” “intend,” “target,” “estimate,” “project,” “predict,” “forecast,” “guideline,” “aim,” “will,” “should,” “likely,” “continue” and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements but are not the exclusive means of identifying such statements. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements and all such forward-looking statements are qualified in their entirety by reference to the following cautionary statements.

Forward-looking statements are based on Holdings’ current expectations, estimates and assumptions and because forward-looking statements address future results, events and conditions, they, by their very nature, involve inherent risks and uncertainties, many of which are unforeseeable and beyond Holdings’ control. Such known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors may cause Holdings’ actual results, performance or other achievements to differ materially from the anticipated results, performance or achievements expressed, projected or implied by these forward-looking statements.

These factors include those discussed under the headings “Risk Factors” and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in Holdings’ periodic filings made with the SEC.

Holdings cautions that couldsuch factors are not exhaustive and that other risks and uncertainties may cause actual results to differ materially from the results projectedthose in any forward-looking statement. In addition to the factors specifically noted in the forward-lookingstatements.

Forward-looking statements other important factors, risks and uncertainties that c ould result in those differences include, but are not limited to, those discussed under Item 1A to Part I “Risk Factors” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended July 31, 2009. The forward-looking statements are madespeak only as of the date they are made and are statements of this reportHoldings’’ current expectations concerning future results, events and we assumeconditions and Holdings is under no obligation to update any of the forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or to update the reasons why actual results could differ from those projected in the forward-looking statements.otherwise. Investors should consult all of the information set forth in this report and the other information set forth from time to time in our reports filed with the SEC pursuant to the Securities Act of 1933 and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, including our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended July 31, 2009.2010.
 
OVERVIEW

We are a former subsidiary of IDT Corporation (“IDT”).Corporation. As a result of the Spin-Off, on September 14, 2009, we became an independent public company. While many of the costs of being a public company were already borne by our business units – either directly or by allocation of corporate overhead from IDT – we now needCorporation continues to incur additional costs for the infrastructure to perform the necessary accounting, internal control and reporting functions. We expect the annual incremental costs for theseprovide certain functions to be between $600,000 and $700,000. A significant portion of these functions will be provided by IDT pursuant to thea Master Services Agreement, dated September 14, 2009, between us and IDT. In2009. During the three and nine months ended April 30,October 31, 2010 our selling, general and administrative expenses were $0.2 million and $1.1 million, respectively, for all services and allocated expenses charged by IDT to us. In the three and nine months ended April 30, 2009, our selling, general and administrative expenses were $0.8$0.1 million and $3.6$.20.15 million, respectively, for all services and allocated expenses charged by IDT Corporation to us. At April 30,October 31, 2010 other current liabilities includedand 2009 the amount owed to IDT Corporation was $0.1 million due to IDT Corporation.and $0.2 million, respectively.
 
On November 17, 2009, wethe Company commenced a tender offer to purchase up to thirty percent of ourits outstanding common stock. We offered to purchase up to 0.4 million shares of our Class A common stock, or any lesser number of Class A shares that stockholders properly tendered inThe Company concluded the tender offer and up to 2.4 million shares of our Class B common stock, or any lesser number of Class B shares that stockholders properly tendered in the tender offer, at a price per share of $1.10, for a maximum aggregate purchase price of $3.1 million. The offer expired on December 22, 2009. In the tender offer, we repurchased 0.2 million shares of Class A common stock and 0.8 million shares of Class B common stock for an aggregate purchase price of $1.1 million, representing approximately 14% of our thenits total outstanding capital stock at the time.

On May 5, 2010, the Company consummated the sale of substantially all of the assets used in the WMET radio station business (other than working capital). WMET 1160 AM is a radio station serving the Washington, D.C. metropolitan area.  The sale price for the WMET assets was $4 million in a combination of cash and a promissory note of the buyer that time.is secured by the assets sold.  $1.3 million of the purchase price was paid in cash at the closing and the remainder is owed pursuant to a two-year promissory note, which is extendable in part to three years at the option of the buyer. The sale met the criteria to be reported as a discontinued operation in the third quarter of fiscal 2010 and accordingly, WMET’s results are classified as part of discontinued operations during the fiscal year 2010.
 
Our principal businesses consist of:
 
 CTM Media Group (“CTM”), our brochure distribution company and other advertising-based new product initiatives focused on small to medium sized businesses; and
 
 Our majority interest in Idea and Design Works, LLC (“IDW”), which is a comic book and graphic novel publisher that creates and licenses intellectual property.
All references to the Company, its assets and results of operations for periods prior to the actual formation of the Company, refer to the subsidiaries of IDT that are now, or were, owned by the Company, and their consolidated assets and results of operations.

 
1210

 

CTM

CTM develops and distributes print and mobile-based advertising and information in targeted tourist markets. Throughout its operating region, CTM operates fivefour integrated and complimentary business lines: Brochure Distribution, Publishing, RightCardTM, and Digital Distribution. CTM had operated its Design & Print Publishing, RightCardTM, and Digital Distribution.business, which it exited at the beginning of the fourth quarter of fiscal 2010. CTM offers its customers a comprehensive media marketing approach through these business lines. In fiscal 2009,2010, CTM serviced over 3,0002,600 clients and maintained more than 11,000 display stations in over 3028 states and provinces in the United States (including Puerto Rico) and Canada. CTM’s display stations are located in travel, tourism and entertainment venues, including hotels and other lodgings, corporate and community venues, transportationtransporta tion terminals and hubs, tourist attractions and e ntertainmententertainment venues. CTM’s revenues represented 60.1%58% and 60% of our consolidated revenues from continuing operations in the ninethree months ended April 30,October 31, 2010 and 63.3% in the similar period in fiscal 2009.2009, respectively.
 
IDW

IDW is a comic book and graphic novel publisher that creates and licenses intellectual property. IDW’s revenues represented 39.9%42% and 40% of our consolidated revenues from continuing operations in the ninethree months ended April 30,October 31, 2010 and 36.7% in the similar period in fiscal 2009.2009, respectively.
 
On November 5, 2009 we purchased an additional 23.335% interest in IDW for a purchase price of $0.4 million in cash.million. As a result of the transaction, we own a 76.665% interest in IDW. We acquired the additional interests as we determined that the purchase price was reasonable as well as to reduce the number of noncontrolling interest holders in this business.
On May 5, 2010, the Company consummated the sale of substantially all of the assets used in the WMET radio station business (other than working capital) for a sale price of $4 million in a combination of cash and a promissory note from the buyer  that is secured by the assets being sold. $1.3 million of the purchase price was paid in cash at the closing and the remainder will be paid pursuant to a two-year promissory note, which is extendable in part to three years at the option of the buyer. The sale met the criteria to be reported as a discontinued operation in the third quarter of fiscal 2010 and accordingly, WMET’s results are classified as part of discontinued operations.
 
REPORTABLE SEGMENTS
 
We have the following two reportable business segments: CTM and IDW are our reportable business segments.IDW.
 
PRESENTATION OF FINANCIAL INFORMATION
 
Basis of presentation

The condensed consolidated financial statements for the periods prior to the September 2009 Spin-Off reflect our financial position, results of operations, and cash flows as if the current structure existed for all periods presented. The financial statements have been prepared using the historical basis for the assets and liabilities and results of operations.
 
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES
 
Our condensed consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes are prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“U.S. GAAP”).States. Our significant accounting policies are described in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal 2009.2010. The preparation of financial statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses as well as the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. Critical accounting policies are those that require application of management’s most subjective or complex judgments, often as a result of matters that are inherently uncertain and may change in subsequent periods. Our critical accounting policie spolicies include those related to the allowance for doubtful accounts, goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite useful lives and valuation of long-lived assets including intangible assets with finite useful lives. Management bases its estimates and judgments on historical experience and other factors that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions. For additional discussion of our critical accounting policies, see our Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal 2009.2010.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

We evaluate the performance of our operating business segments based primarily on income (loss) from operations. Accordingly, the income and expense line items below income (loss) from operations are only included in our discussion of the consolidated results of operations.
 
 
1311

 
 
Three and Nine Months Ended April 30,October 31, 2010 Compared to Three and Nine Months Ended April 30,October 31, 2009
 
Consolidated Revenues
 (in millions)       Change 
Quarter ended October 31, 2010  2009   $   % 
Revenues             
CTM
 $5.0  $4.9  $0.1   2.0 
IDW
  3.6   3.3   0.3   9.0 
Total revenues
 $8.6  $8.2  $0.4   4.8 
 
(in millions) 
Three Months ended
April 30,
  Change  
Nine Months ended
April 30,
  Change 
  2010  2009     $ %  2010   2009     $ %
Revenues                            
CTM $4.1  $3.9  $0.2   4.5% $12.9  $14.2  $(1.3)  (9.5) %
IDW  2.7   2.9   (0.2)  (5.0)  8.5   8.3   0.2   3.5 
Total revenues $6.8  $6.8  $(0.0)  0.4% $21.4  $22.5  $(1.1)  (4.7) %

Revenues.The increase in consolidated revenues in the three months ended April 30,October 31, 2010 compared to the three months ended October 31, 2009 was primarily due to a marginal increase in CTM revenues of $0.1 million and an increase in IDW revenues of $0.3 million. Revenues at our IDW segment increased as a result of increases in publishing revenues of $0.3 million and Digital and Creative Services revenue of $0.1 million which were partially offset by a decline in Licensing and Royalty Revenues of $0.1 million. The marginal increase in CTM revenues was primarily due to better economic conditions in the current fiscal period compared to the same period in fiscal 2010.

Consolidated Costs and Expenses
 (in millions)       Change 
Three months ended October 31, 2010  2009   $   % 
Costs and expenses             
Direct cost of revenues
 $3.8  $3.7  $0.1   2.7 
Selling, general and administrative
  3.8   3.2   0.6   18.8 
Depreciation and amortization
  0.2   0.2       
Bad debt expense
  0.0   0.0       
Total costs and expenses
 $7.8  $7.1  $0.7   9.8 


Direct Cost of Revenues. Direct Cost of Consolidated Revenues in the three months ended October 31, 2010 compared to the similar period in fiscal 2009 was flat as the increase in CTM revenues was offset by a decrease in IDW revenues. The increase in CTM revenues was primarily due to an increase in distribution and barter revenue offset by a decrease in printing revenues. The decrease in consolidated revenues in the nine months ended April 30, 2010 compared to the similar period in fiscal 2009 was primarily due to the decrease in CTM revenues, partially offset by an increase in IDW revenues. The decrease in CTM revenues was primarily due to a global economic slowdown in our distribution and printing businesses. Some of CTM’s distribution customers rely on state and local funding or grants which ha ve been decreased or eliminated, resulting in reduced advertising and customer spending and, in some cases, certain of our customers going out of business. The increase in IDW revenues was primarily due to an increase in licensing and royalty, digital publishing and creative service revenue, partially offset by lower publishing revenue..
(in millions) 
Three Months ended
April 30,
  Change  
Nine Months ended
April 30,
  Change 
  2010  2009     $ %  2010   2009     $ %
Costs and expenses                            
Direct cost of revenues $3.6  $3.6  $(0.0)  0.1% $10.6  $10.6  $0.0   0.3%
Selling, general and administrative  3.7   3.3   0.4   12.0   10.3   10.9   (0.6)  (5.1)
Depreciation and amortization  0.2   0.2   (0.0) nm   0.7   0.8   (0.1)  (15.4)
Bad debt expense  -   0.2   (0.2) nm   0.1   0.5   (0.4)  (83.0)
Impairment and severance charges  -   0.1   (0.1) nm   -   32.1   (32.1) nm 
Total costs and expenses $7.5  $7.4  $0.1   1.2% $21.7  $54.9  $(33.2)  (60.5) %

nm—not meaningful

marginally increased.  Direct Cost of Revenues. The direct cost of revenues at IDW for the three months ended October 31, 2010 and 2009 was approximately $2.2 million and $2.1 million respectively. Direct costs of revenues at CTM for the three months ended October 31, 2010 and 2009 were each approximately $1.6 million. Overall gross margin increased from 54.9% in the three months ended April 30, 2010 comparedOctober 31, 2009 to the similar period in fiscal 2009 was flat with a slight decrease in CTM revenues offset by a slight increase in IDW revenues.  The decrease in CTM direct cost of revenues was a result of a decrease in printing revenue. The increase in IDW direct cost of revenues was a result of a shift in product mix. The direct cost of revenues in the nine months ended April 30, 2010 compared to the similar period in fiscal 2009 was relatively flat with a slight decrease in CTM revenues offset by a slight increase in IDW revenues. The decrease in CTM’s direct cost of revenues was primarily due to decreased in distribution and printing revenues offset by increased gasoli ne and payroll expenses. The increase in IDW’s direct cost of revenues reflects the increase in revenues and the shift in product mix. Overall gross margin percentage slightly increased to 47.2%55.8% in the three months ended April 30, 2010 from 47.1%October 31, 2010. The increase was due to increases in the similar period in fiscal 2009. Overall gross margin percentage decreased to 50.6% in the nine months ended April 30, 2010 from 53.1% in the similar period in fiscal 2009, primarily due to a decrease inat both our CTM segment and IDW segments. CTM’s gross margin since a significant portion of CTM cost of sales is fixed,increased from 67.3% in the three months ended October 31, 2009 to 68.0% in th e three months ended October 31, 2010, while IDW’s gross margin percentage decreases when revenues decrease. Additionally,margins increased from 36.3% in the gross margin percentage decreased duethree months ended October 31, 2009 to IDW’s mix of products.38.8% in the three months ended October 31, 2010.
 
Selling, General and Administrative. Selling, general, and administrative expenses increased from $3.2 million in the three months ended October 31, 2009 to $3.8 million in the three months ended October 31, 2010. As a percentage of consolidated revenues, selling, general and administrative costs increased from 39.0% in the three months ended October 31, 2009 to 44.2% in the three months ended October 31, 2010. The increase in selling, general and administrative expenses in the three months ended April 30,October 31, 2010 compared to the similar period in fiscal 20092010 was primarily due to a result of an increase in the selling, general and administrative expenses of CTM and IDW.a marginal increase in our IDW segment. CTM’s selling, general and administrative expenses increase was primarily a result of costs associated with operating as a publicly traded company and non cash compensation costs offset by a decrease in costs from exited lines of business. The decrease in selling, general and administrative expensesincreased in the ninethree months ended April 30,end ed October 31, 2010 compared to the similar period in fiscalthree months ended October 31, 2009 was due to a decrease in the selling, general and administrative expenses of CTM offset by an increase in IDW costs. CTM’s selling, general and administrative expenses decrease was primarily due to the exit from certain unprofitable lines of businesses, reduction in compensation, commissions and insurance expenses partially offset by costs associated with operating as a publicly traded company and non cash compensation cost. IDW’s selling, general and administrative expenses increase was primarily due to an increase in the numberpayroll costs, offsite costs related to meetings of employees, consultantsCTM’s sales personnel, advertising costs, and IDW’s share of costs associated with operating as a publicly traded company. Total selling,audit/accounting costs. Selling, general, and administrative expenses associated with operatingcosts at our IDW segment marginally increased as a publicly traded company was $0.1 millionresult of increase in personnel costs and $0.5 million for the three and nine months ended April 30, 2010. Stock based compensation costs was $0.1 million and $0.2 million for the three and nine months ended April 30, 2010.marketing expenses.
14

As a percentage of total revenues, selling, general and administrative expenses increased to 53.4% in the three months ended April 30, 2010 from 47.9% in the similar period in fiscal 2009, as selling, general and administrative expenses increased while revenues remained comparatively flat. As a percentage of total revenues, the selling, general and administrative expenses remained relatively flat at 48.4% for the nine months ended April 30, 2010 compared to 48.5% in the similar period in fiscal 2009.
 
On October 14, 2009, our Board of Directors granted our Chairman and founder, Howard S. Jonas, 1.8 million restricted shares of our Class B common stock with a value of $1.25 million on the date of grant in lieu of a cash base salary for the next five years. The restricted shares will vest in equal thirds on each of October 14, 2011, October 14, 2012 and October 14, 2013. Unvested shares would be forfeited if we terminate Mr. Jonas’ employment other than under circumstances where the accelerated vesting applies. The shares are subject to adjustments or acceleration based on certain corporate transactions, changes in capitalization, or termination, death or disability of Mr. Jonas. If Mr. Jonas is terminated by us for cause, a pro rata portion of the shares would vest.vest and the remainder would be forfeited. This arrangement does notno t impact Mr. Jonas’ ca shcash compensation from the date of the Spin-Off through the pay period ending onincluding the grant date. Total unrecognized compensation cost on the grant date was $1.25 million. The unrecognized compensation cost ishas been and expected to continue to be recognized over the vesting period from October 14, 2009 through October 14, 2014.  The related stock-based compensation related to this grant in the first quarter of fiscal 2011 and 2010 was $0.1 million$112 thousand and $0.2 million for the three and nine months ended April 30, 2010,19 thousand, respectively.
 
Bad Debt Expense.The decrease in bad Bad debt expense in the three and nine months ended April 30,October 31, 2010 of fiscal 2011 compared to the same period in fiscal 2010 was due primarilyflat.

12

Net Income attributable to a decrease in bad debt expense of CTM.CTM Media Holdings, Inc. and non controlling interests
(in millions)       Change 
Three months ended October 31, 2010  2009   $   % 
Income from continuing operations
 $0.8  $1.0  $(0.2)  (20.0)
Interest income, net
            
Other expense, net
            
Provision for income taxes
     (0.2)  0.2   100.0 
Loss from discontinued operations
     (0.1)  0.1   100.0 
Net income
  0.8   0.7   0.1   14.3 
Less: Net income attributable to non controlling interest
  (0.1)  (0.2)  0.1   50.0 
Net income attributable to CTM Media Holdings, Inc.
 $0.7  $0.5  $0.2   40.0 
  
Impairment and Severance Charges. In the second quarter of fiscal 2009, the following events and circumstances indicated that the fair value of certain of our reporting units may be below their carrying value: (1) a significant adverse change in the business climate, (2) operating losses of reporting units, and (3) significant revisions to internal forecasts. We measured the fair value of our reporting units by discounting their estimated future cash flows using an appropriate discount rate. The carrying value including goodwill of CTM and IDW exceeded their estimated fair values; therefore additional steps were performed for these reporting units to determine whether an impairment of goodwill was required. As a result of this analysis, in the three and nine months ended Apr il 30, 2009, we recorded goodwill impairment of $29.7 million in CTM and $1.8 million in IDW, which reduced the carrying amount of the goodwill in each of these reporting units to zero. In the three and nine months ended April 30, 2009 we recorded restructuring charges of $0.1 million and $0.7 million, respectively, consisting primarily of severance related to a company-wide cost savings program and reduction in force.

(in millions) 
Three Months ended
April 30,
  Change  
Nine Months ended
April 30,
  Change 
  2010  2009   $  %   2010   2009   $  % 
 Loss from operations $(0.7) $(0.6) $(0.1)  10.3% $(0.3) $(32.4) $32.1  nm 
Interest income, net  -   -   -  nm   (0.1)  -   (0.1) nm 
Other income, net  (0.1)  -   (0.1) Nm   (0.1)  -   (0.1) nm 
Benefit from income taxes  -   0.1   (0.1) nm   (0.1)  -   (0.1) nm 
Net loss  (0.8)  (0.5)  (0.3) nm   (0.6)  (32.4)  31.8  nm 
Loss from discontinued operations  (0.3)  (1.3)  1.0  nm   (0.6)  (1.8)  1.2  nm 
Net loss  (1.1)  (1.8)  0.7  nm   (1.2)  (34.2)  33.0  nm 
     Less: Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interest  -   -   -  nm   0.1   (0.7)  0.8  nm 
Net loss attributable to CTM Media Holdings, Inc. $(1.1) $(1.8) $0.7   41.0% $(1.3) $(33.5) $32.2  nm 

nm—not meaningful

Income Taxes.  Benefit from (provision for)Provision for income taxes intax for the three and nine months ended April 30,October 31, 2010 compared to 2009 decreased by $170,000.  This decrease is due to the similar periodutilization of tax benefits that were created in fiscalperiods subsequent to October 31, 2009 remained substantially unchanged.of $120,000, and a reduction in foreign earnings and related foreign income tax of $50,000.  

We and IDT entered into a Tax Separation Agreement, dated as of September 14, 2009, to provide for certain tax matters including the assignment of responsibility for the preparation and filing of tax returns, the payment of and indemnification for taxes, entitlement to tax refunds and the prosecution and defense of any tax controversies. Pursuant to this agreement, IDT must indemnify us from all liability for taxes of ours and our subsidiaries for periods ending on or before September 14, 2009, and we must indemnify IDT from all liability for taxes of ours and our subsidiaries accruing after September 14, 2009. Also, for periods ending on or before September 14, 2009, IDT hasshall have the right to control the conduct of any audit, examination or other proceeding brought by a taxing authority. We shall have the right to participate jointlyjointl y in any proceeding that may affect our tax liability unless IDT has indemnified us. Finally, we and our subsidiaries agreed not to carry back any net operating losses, capital losses or credits for any taxable period ending after September 14, 2009 to a taxable period ending on or before September 14, 2009 unless required by applicable law, in which case any refund of taxes attributable to such carry back shall be for the benefitaccount of IDT.
15

IDT Corporation.
 
Income (loss) attributable to noncontrollingnon-controlling interest. Non-controlling interests .Our noncontrolling interests relate to minority holders of IDW. On November 5, 2009, we purchased an additionalarise from the 23.335% interest in IDW for a purchase price of $0.4 million in cash. As a result of the transaction, we own a 76.665% interest in IDW.not held by Holdings.
CTM

(in millions)       Change 
Three months ended October 31, 2010  2009   $   % 
Revenues
 $5.0  $4.9  $0.1  $2.0 
Direct cost of revenues
  1.6   1.6       
Selling, general and administrative
  2.7   2.3   0.4   17.4 
Depreciation and amortization
  0.2   0.2       
Bad debt expense
            
Impairment and severance charges
            
Income from operations $0.5  $0.8  $(0.3) $(37.5)
 
CTM
(in millions) 
Three months ended
April 30,
  Change  
Nine Months ended
April 30,
  Change 
  2010  2009  $  %   2010   2009  $  % 
Revenues $4.1  $3.9  $0.2  4.5% $12.9  $14.2  $(1.3) (9.5) %
Direct cost of revenues  1.7   1.9   (0.2) (10.3)  5.1   5.5   (0.4) (7.6)
Selling, general and administrative  2.5   2.4   0.1  3.9   7.1   8.4   (1.3) (15.9)
Depreciation and amortization  0.2   0.2   0.0  nm   0.6   0.6   0.0  nm 
Bad debt expense  0.0   0.2   (0.2) nm   0.1   0.5   (0.4) nm 
Impairment and severance charges  0.0   0.1   (0.1) nm   0.0   30.3   (30.3) nm 
(Loss) income from operations $(0.3) $(0.9) $0.6  nm  $0.0  $(31.1) $31.1  nm 
nm—not meaningful

Revenues.The marginal increase in CTM’s revenues in the three months ended April 30,October 31, 2010 compared to the similar period in fiscalthree months ended October 31, 2009  was primarily due to an increaseincreases in distribution and barter revenuepublishing revenues, digital distribution revenues and  right card revenues, which were partially offset by a decreasedecline in printing revenues. In the fourth quarter of fiscal 2010, CTM exited the unprofitable printing business. The most significant increase in the distributions revenue have been in our New York market were Broadway show advertising has rebounded, followed by our Canada business which has been positively affected byand now refers customers to a revised barter agreement. The increase in distribution revenue is partially offset by decreases in Florida, Philadelphiathird party provider and New England. The decrease in our printing business is a result of a departure from this business toward the end of the third quarter. The only revenues from this line of business going forward will be onreceives a commission basis for referring our customer base. The decrease in CTM’s revenues inon the nine months ended April 30, 2010 compared to the similar period in fiscal 2009 was primarily due to a the global economic slowdown in our distribution and  printing business. The most significant declines were in our New York market, due to the weakness in Broadway show advertising, followed by Connecticut, Pennsylvania, Florida and Chicago. Some of CTM’s distribution customers rely on state and local funding or grants which have been decreased or eliminated resulting in reduced advertising and customer spending.work.
 
Direct Cost of Revenues.Direct cost of revenues consists primarily of distribution and fulfillment payroll, warehouse, and vehicle distribution, expenses and print and design expenses. Direct cost of revenues for the three months ended October 31, 2010 was approximately the same as the three months ended October 31, 2009. The decreasedecline in direct cost of printing revenues, CTM’s unprofitable line of business that we exited at the beginning of the fourth quarter of fiscal 2010, were offset by marginal increases in direct costs of digital distribution revenues, right cardrevenues, and distribution and publishing revenues. Additionally, CTM’s distribution and fleet maintenance costs marginally increased during the three months ended April 30,October 31, 2010 is a result of a decrease in printing revenues. Despite the slight increase in distribution revenue the cost remains relatively flat as most of its costs are fixed. The decrease in direct cost of revenues in the nine months ended April 30, 2010 compared to the similar period in fiscal 2009 is primarily due to decreased in distribution and printing revenues offset by increased gasoline and payroll expenses.three months ende d October 31, 2009.
 
CTM’s gross margin percentage increased in the three months ended April 30,October 31, 2010 to 57.7% from 50.7%68.0% compared to 67.3% in the three months ended October 31, 2009. The increase was primarily due to lowera shift in product mix to relatively higher margin distribution revenues in the printing business which hasfrom  relatively lower margins. CTM’s gross margin percentage decreased to 60.5% in the nine months ended April 30, 2010 from 61.3% in the similar period in fiscal 2009. Since a significant portion of CTM’s cost of sales is fixed, the gross margin percentage decreases when revenues decrease. Additionally, there was an increase in gasoline and payroll costs during the nine months ended April 30, 2010 which negatively impacted the gross margin.printing revenues.
 
Selling, General and Administrative.Selling, general and administrative expenses consist primarily of payroll and related benefits, facilities costs and insurance. Selling, general and administrative expenses was relatively flat forincreased in the three months ended April 30,October 31, 2010 as compared to the similar period in fiscal 2009. The increase of $0.2 million in costs associated with operating as a publicly traded company and stock based compensation was offset by a $0.2 million decrease in costs from exited lines of business. Selling, general and administrative expenses decreased in the ninethree months ended April 30, 2010 as compared to the similar period in fiscalOctober 31, 2009 primarily due to the exit from certain unprofitable lines of businesses, reductionincrease in compensation, commissionspayroll costs, offsite costs related to our sales personnel, advertising costs, and ins urances partially offset by costs associated with operating as a publicly traded company and stock based compensation. Total selling, general and administrative expenses associated with operating as a publicly traded company and stock based compensation was $0.3 and $0.2 million for the nine months ended April 30, 2010. accounting costs.
13

As a percentage of CTM’s aggregate revenues, selling, general and administrative expenses decreased to 60.7% and 54.9%increased in the three and nine monthsmonth ended April 30,October 31, 2010 respectively,to 54.0% from 61.0% and 59.1%46.9% in the three and nine months ended April 30October 31, 2009, respectively.
Impairmentas selling, general and severance charges. Inadministrative expenses increased at a faster rate than the nine months ended April 30, 2009, we recorded aggregate goodwill impairment of $29.7 millionincrease in CTM, which reduced the carrying amount of the goodwill to zero. In the three and nine months ended April 30, 2009, we recorded restructuring charges of $0.1 million and $0.6 million, respectively, consisted primarily of severance related to a company-wide cost savings program and reduction in force.revenues.

16

IDW
 
(in millions) 
Three Months ended
April 30,
  Change  
Nine Months ended
April 30,
  Change        Change 
Three months ended October 31, 2010  2009   $   % 
 2010  2009  $  %   2010   2009  $  %              
Revenues $2.7  $2.9  $(0.2) (5.0)% $8.5  $8.3  $0.2  3.5% $3.6  $3.3  $0.3   9.0 
Direct cost of revenues  1.8   1.7   0.1  11.8   5.5   5.0   0.5  9.0   2.2   2.1   0.1   4.7 
Selling, general and administrative  1.2   0.9   0.3  33.4   3.2   2.6   0.6  31.3   1.0   0.9   0.1   11.1 
Depreciation and amortization  -   -   -  nm   0.1   0.2   (0.1) nm   0.0   0.0   0.0    
Impairment and severance charges  -   -   -  nm   0.0   1.8   (1.8) nm 
(Loss) income from operations $(0.3) $0.3  $(0.6) nm  $(0.3) $(1.3) $(1.0) nm 
Income from operations
 $0.4  $0.3  $0.1   33.3 
  
nm—not meaningful

Revenues. The increase in IDW’s revenues in the three months ended April 30,October 31, 2010 as compared to the similar period in fiscalthree months ended October 31, 2009 was  lower due to publishing revenue from comic book movie releases toward the end of the third quarter of 2009, which resulted in higher revenue in that period. The decrease in publishing revenues was partially offset by an increase in creative services and digital publishing revenue. The increase in IDW’s revenues in the nine months ended April 30, 2010 as compared to the similar period in fiscal 2009 was primarily due to an increase in licensingPublishing revenues, Digital Publishing revenues, and royalty, digital publishing and creative services revenue,Creative Services revenues which were partially offset by lower publishing revenue. We doa decline in Licensing and Royalty Services revenues. Publishing revenues increased due to the release of additional titles such as The Outfit, James Patterson’s Witch and Wizard, Classics Mutilated, and Bloom County Vol. 3, Digitals Publishing revenues increased as a result of the conversion of more titles to digital based formats and increased use of digital equipment by consumers. Creative Services revenues increased as a resu lt of additional creative service projects during the first quarter of fiscal 2011 that were not expect IDW’sexperienced in the first fiscal quarter of last year. Licensing and Royalty revenues in the first quarter of fiscal 2011, was higher that the same quarter in fiscal 2010 revenues to be as high as those earned in fis cal 2009 since revenues generated byresult of four movies options granted during the comic book movie releases in the fourthfirst quarter of 2009 were exceptionally high.fiscal 2010.
 
In an effort to increase availability of versions of its content at retail outlets, IDW has entered into a number of digital distribution agreements thisover the past calendar year, and IDW’s publications are currently available for purchase via mobile phones, primarily iPhones/iPod Touch. Various IDW titles are also available direct-to-desktop via several websites and are available on Sony’s PSP and PSP Go.Go gaming devices.
 
Direct Cost of Revenues.Direct cost of revenues consists primarily of printing expenses and costs of artists and writers. Direct costcosts of revenues in the three months ended April 30, 2010 as compared to the similar period in fiscal 2009 was slightly higherincreased primarily due to an increase in direct costs of printing services, direct costs of creative services and royalty expenses which were partially offset by a shiftdecline in product mix. The product shift of increased sales to hard cover edition graphic novels bear a slightly higher cost of sales than the traditional soft cover comic books with lower cost of sales. Additionally, fiscal 2010 revenue consisted of an increased number of titles sold, with lower sales per title. This resulted in lower print runs, which carry a higher print cost per unit.direct digital publishing and direct licensing costs. The increase in direct cost of revenuesprinting services, direct costs of creative services and royalty expenses in the ninethree months ended April 30,October 31, 2010 as compared to the similar period in fiscalthree months ended October 31, 2009 primarily reflects the increase in revenues,revenues. Direct costs of digital publishing during the shiftthree months ended October 31, 2009 was higher due to certain one-time costs incurred during that period. Direct costs of licensing declined during the three months ended October 31, 2010 compared to the three months ended October 31, 2009 primarily as a result of a decline in product mix.related revenues.
 
IDW’s aggregate gross margin decreasedincreased in the three and nine months ended April 30,October 31, 2010 to 32.0% and 35.6%, respectively,38.9% from 42.2% and 38.9% in the similar periods in fiscal 2009. The decrease36.4% in the three and nine months ended April 30,October 31, 2009. The increase in the three months ended October 31, 2010 was primarily due to the mix of products.products and lower costs.
 
Selling, General and Administrative.Selling, general and administrative expenses marginally increased in the three and nine months ended April 30,October 31, 2010 as compared to the similar period in fiscalthree months ended October 31, 2009 primarily due to anhigher commissions on increased revenues and the increase in allocated expenses to IDW by CTM Holdings in fiscal 2010. This allocation includes executive salaries, stock based compensation and costs associated with operating as a publicly traded company, which were approximately $0.2 million and $0.4 million for the three and nine months ended April 30, 2010, respectively. IDW has increased staff in an effort to increase the number of titles soldemployees and establishconsultants, as well as a footprint into digital distribution.marginal increase in occupancy costs. As a percentage of IDW’s aggregate revenues, selling, general and administrative expenses marginally increased in the three and nine months ended April 30,October 31, 2010 to 42.9% and 38.5%, respectively,27.8% from 30.5% and 30.3% in27.3% compared to the similar periods in fiscal 2009, as revenues increased at a slower rate than selling, general and administrative expenses.
Impairment and severance charges. In th ninethree months ended April 30, 2009, we recorded aggregate goodwill impairment of $1.8 million in IDW, which reduced the carrying amount of the goodwill to zero.October 31, 2009.

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
 
Historically, we satisfied our cash requirements primarily through cash provided by CTM’s operating activities and funding from IDT Corporation.
(in millions) Nine months ended April 30,  Three months ended October 31, 
 2010  2009  2010  2009 
Cash flows provided by (used in):            
Operating activities $1.8  $(0.5) $0.1  $2.1 
Investing activities  (0.7)  (1.5)  (0.1)  (0.1)
Financing activities  (1.4)  0.6   (0.1)  1.6 
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents from continuing operations  (0.3)  (1.4)
Discontinued operations  (0.4)  (0.2)
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents $(0.7) $(1.6)
(Decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents
 $(0.1) $3.6 
 
 
1714

 

Operating Activities
Activities. Our cash flow from operations varies from quarter to quarter and from year to year, depending on our operating results and the timing of operating cash receipts and payments, specifically trade accounts receivable and trade accounts payable. Beginning in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2008, we commenced to exit from certain unprofitable lines of businesses of CTM, consisting of Traffic Pull, Local Pull and Click2Talk. The exit from these lines of business is completed. The Local Pull product is still being offeredCash flows provided by CTM, however the business model has been reworked and Local Pull is being marketed through outsourced channels, which is more cost effective for us. Cash used in operating activities frombased on these exited businesses was approximately $0.9factors were $0.1 million and $2.1 million for the ninethree months ended April 30, 2009.October 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively.

Investing Activities
Activities. Our capital expenditures were $0.3$0.1 million each in the ninethree months ended April 30,October 31, 2010 and $0.5 million in the similar period2009, respectively. We currently anticipate that total capital expenditures for all of our divisions in fiscal 2009.

On November 5, 2009, we purchased an additional 23.335% interest in IDW for a purchase price of $0.4 million in cash. As a result of the transaction, we own a 76.665% interest in IDW. We acquired the additional interests as we determined that the purchase price was reasonable as well as to reduce the number of noncontrolling interest holders in this business.

On May 5, 2010, the Company consummated the sale of substantially all of the assets used in the WMET radio station business (other than working capital) for a sale price of $4 million in a combination of cash and a promissory note from the buyer that is secured by the assets sold.  $1.3 million of the purchase price was paid in cash at the closing and the remainder2011 will be paid pursuantapproximately $0.3 million. We expect to a two-year promissory note, which is extendable in part to three years at the option of the buyer.fund our capital expenditures with our cash, cash equivalents and short term investments on hand.

Financing Activities
Activities. During allthe three months ended October 31, 2010, we did not receive any financing from IDT Corporation. During the periods presented throughthough the September 14, 2009 Spin-Off, IDT Corporation provided us with the required liquidity to fund our working capital requirements and investments for some of our businesses. During that period, weWe used any excess cash provided by our operations to repay IDT. In the ninethree months ended April 30, 2010 andOctober 31, 2009, IDT Corporation provided cash to us of $2.4 million and $1.1 million, respectively.million. In September 2009, the amount due to IDT Corporation of $27.3$25.3 million was converted into a capital contribution.
 
WeDuring the three months ended October 31, 2010 and 2009, we distributed cash of $0.4 million in the nine months ended April 30, 2010 and $0.3 million in the similar period in fiscal 2009 to the minority shareholders of IDW.IDW in the amount of $0.01million and $0.4 million, respectively.
 
We repaid capital lease obligations of $0.2 million in the nine months ended April 30, 2010 and $0.1 million in each of the similar period in fiscal 2009.
We repurchased $1.1 million of our Class A and Class B common stock in the ninethree months ended April 30,October 31, 2010 in connection with the tender offer that expired on December 22,and 2009.
On February 23, 2010, our Board of Directors approved the payment of a cash dividend in the amount of $0.25 per share ($2.1 million in the aggregate) which was paid on March 15, 2010 to stockholders of record as of March 8, 2010 of our Class A, Class B and Class C common stock..
On March 16, 2010, our Board of Directors, in light of our significant cash position, the positive impact of the declaration and payment of the $0.25 per share dividend and the lack of near-term needs or opportunities for deployment of our cash, determined to declare the payment of a cash dividend for our fourth quarter in the amount of $0.06 per share (approximately $0.5 million in the aggregate).  The dividend, subject to confirmation by our management that there is sufficient surplus as of the proposed payment date, will be paid on or about June 15, 2010 to stockholders of record as of May 3, 2010 of our Class A common stock, Class B common stock and Class C common stock.

The declaration of any future dividend will be at the discretion of our Board of Directors and will depend on our financial condition, results of operations, capital requirements, business conditions and other factors, as well as a determination by our Board of Directors that dividends are in the best interest of our stockholders.

 
CHANGES IN TRADE ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE AND ALLOWANCE FOR DOUBTFUL ACCOUNTS
Gross trade accounts receivable decreasedincreased marginally to $3.4$4.3 million at April 30,October 31, 2010 compared to $4.6$4.2 million at July 31, 2009, primarily due to higher collections in IDW.2010. The allowance for doubtful accounts as a percentage of gross trade accounts receivable marginally increased to 25.3%18.6% at April 30,October 31, 2010 compared to 14.7%from 18.2% at July 31, 2009, primarily due to an increase in WMET’s allowance for bad debt.2010.
 
Other Sources and Uses of Resources
We intend to, where appropriate, make strategic investments and acquisitions to complement, expand, and/or enter into new businesses. In considering acquisitions and investments, we search for opportunities to profitably grow our existing businesses, to add qualitatively to the range of businesses in our portfolio and to achieve operational synergies. Historically, such acquisitions have not exceeded $0.5 million, with the average acquisition being less than $0.1 million. If we were to pursue an acquisition in excess of $0.5 million we would likely need to secure financing arrangements. At this time, we cannot guarantee that we will be presented with acquisition opportunities that meet our return on investment criteria, or that our efforts to make acquisitions that meet our criteria will be successful.

In addition, we will utilize approximately $2 million annually to pay the regular quarterly dividends in the amount of $0.06 per share,, subject to confirmation by our management that there is sufficient surplus as of the proposed future payment dates and other circumstances existing at the relevant times.
18


Historically, we satisfied our cash requirements primarily through cash provided by CTM’s operating activities and funding from IDT.IDT Corporation. The conversion of our balance due to IDT Corporation into a capital contribution as well as the $2.0 million cash contribution by IDT in September 2009 significantly improved our working capital balance. We do not currently have any material debt obligations. With the exit of certain lines of businesses within CTM, we expect that our operations in fiscal 20102011 and the balance of cash, cash equivalents and short term investment that we held as of April 30,October 31, 2010, will be sufficient to meet our currently anticipated working capital and capital expenditure requirements, capital lease obligations, make limited acquisitions and investments, pay the currently announced and any future declared dividends and fund any potential operating cash flow deficits within any of our seg mentssegments for at least the next twelve months. In addition, we anticipate that our expected cash balances, as well as cash flows from our operations, will be sufficient to meet our long-term liquidity needs. The foregoing is based on a number of assumptions, including that we will collect on our receivables, effectively manage our working capital requirements, and maintain our revenue levels and liquidity. Predicting these matters is particularly difficult in the current worldwide economic situation and overall decline in consumer demand. Failure to generate sufficient revenues and operating income could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.

FOREIGN CURRENCY RISK
Revenues from our international operations represented 7.7%9.6% and 6.7%8.8% of our consolidated revenues for the ninethree months ended April 30,October 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. A significant portion of theseThese revenues isare in currencies other than the U.S. Dollar, primarily Canadian dollars and recently in Euros, although our revenues in Euros are not significant at this time.dollars. Our foreign currency exchange risk is somewhat mitigated by our ability to offset the majority of these non-U.S. Dollar-denominated revenues with operating expenses that are paid in the same currencies. While the impact from fluctuations in foreign exchange rates affects our revenues and expenses denominated in foreign currencies, the net amount of our exposure to foreign currency exchange rate changes at the end of each reporting period is generally not material.
 
OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS
We and IDT entered into a Tax Separation Agreement, dated as of September 14, 2009, to provide for certain tax matters including the assignment of responsibility for the preparation and filing of tax returns, the payment of and indemnification for taxes, entitlement to tax refunds and the prosecution and defense of any tax controversies. Pursuant to this agreement, IDT must indemnify us from all liability for taxes of ours and our subsidiaries for periods ending on or before September 14, 2009, and we must indemnify IDT from all liability for taxes of ours and our subsidiaries accruing after September 14, 2009. Also, for periods ending on or before September 14, 2009, IDT has the right to control the conduct of any audit, examination or other proceeding brought by a taxing authority. We have the right to participate jointly in any proceeding that may affect our tax liability unless IDT has indemnified us. Finally, we and our subsidiaries agreed not to carry back any net operating losses, capital losses or credits for any taxable period ending after September 14, 2009 to a taxable period ending on or before September 14, 2009 unless required by applicable law, in which case any refund of taxes attributable to such carry back shall be for the benefit of IDT.
RECENTLY ADOPTED ACCOUNTING STANDARDS
In June 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued changes to the accounting for transfers of financial assets. These changes include (a) eliminating the concept of a qualifying special-purpose entity (“QSPE”) (b) clarifying and amending the derecognition criteria for a transfer to be accounted for as a sale, (c) amending and clarifying the unit of account eligible for sale accounting, and (d) requiring that a transferor initially measure at fair value and recognize all assets obtained and liabilities incurred as a result of a transfer of an entire financial asset or group of financial assets accounted for as a sale. Additionally, on and after the effective date, existing QSPEs must be evaluated for consolidation by reporting entities in accordance with the applicable consolidation guidance. These changes also require enhanced disclosures about, among other things, (a) a transferor’s continuing involvement with transfers of financial assets accounted for as sales, (b) the risks inherent in the transferred financial assets that have been retained, and (c) the nature and financial effect of restrictions on the transferor’s assets that continue to be reported in the statement of financial position. We are required to adopt these changes on August 1, 2010. We are currently evaluating the impact of these changes on our consolidated financial statements.
In June 2009, the FASB issued changes to the consolidation guidance applicable to a variable interest entity (“VIE”) including amending the guidance governing the determination of whether an enterprise is the primary beneficiary of a VIE, and is, therefore, required to consolidate the entity, by requiring a qualitative analysis rather than a quantitative analysis. The qualitative analysis will include, among other things, consideration of who has the power to direct the activities of the entity that most significantly impact the entity’s economic performance and who has the obligation to absorb losses or the right to receive benefits of the VIE that could potentially be significant to the VIE. The changes also require continuous reassessments of whether an enterprise is the primary beneficiary of a VIE and enhanc ed disclosures about an enterprise’s involvement with a VIE. We are required to adopt these changes on August 1, 2010. We are currently evaluating the impact of these changes on our consolidated financial statements.
 
1915

 
 
OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS
We do not have any “off-balance sheet arrangements,” as defined in relevant SEC regulations that are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on our financial condition, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources.
RECENTLY ADOPTED ACCOUNTING STANDARDS
The Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) periodically issues new accounting standards in a continuing effort to improve standards of financial accounting and reporting. We have reviewed the recently issued pronouncements and concluded that no new standards were issued this fiscal quarter that applied to the Company.
In January 2010, the FASB amendedissued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2010-06, “Improving Disclosures about Fair Value Measurements” (“ASU 2010-06”), which is included in the accounting standard relating to fair value measurements primarily to improve the disclosures about fair value measurements in financial statements. The main provisions of the amendment requireASC Topic 820 (Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures). ASU 2010-06 requires new disclosures about (1)on the amount and reason for transfers in and out of the three levels of theLevel 1 and 2 fair value hierarchymeasurements.  ASU 2010-06 also requires disclosure of activities, including purchases, sales, issuances, and (2) activitysettlements within the Level 3 of the hierarchy. In addition, the amendment clarifies existing disclosures about (1) the level of disaggregation of fair value measurements (2)and clarifies existing disclosure requirements on levels of disaggregation and disclosures about inputs and valuation techniquestechniques.  Except for otherwise provided, ASU 2010-06 is effective for interim and inputs usedannual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2009. The adoption of this standa rd did not have a material effect on the Company’s financial statements.

In February 2010, the FASB issued ASU No. 2010-09, “Amendments to measure fair value,Certain Recognition and (3) postretirement benefit plan assets. We wereDisclosure Requirements” (“ASU 2010-09”), which is included in ASC Topic 855 (Subsequent Events).  ASU 2010-09 clarifies that an SEC filer is required to adopt these changes to our disclosures about fair value measurements on February 1, 2010, except for certainevaluate subsequent events through the date that the financial statements are issued.  ASU 2010-09 was effective upon the issuance of the disclosures about the activity within Level 3, which are required to be adopted on August 1, 2011. We dofinal update and did not expect the adoption of these changes to our disclosures about fair value measurements to have ana significant impact on ourthe Company’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows.statements.
Item 3.   Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market RisksRisks.
 
Smaller reporting companies are not required to provide the information required by this item.
Item 4T.4.   Controls and ProceduresProcedures.
 
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures.This Based on their evaluation as of October 31, 2010, our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer have evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) and concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective to ensure that the information required to be disclosed by us in this Quarterly Report does not include a report of management’s assessment regarding internal control over financial reporting dueon Form 10-Q was (i) recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and regulations and (ii) accumulated and communicated to a transition period established by rules of the SEC for newly public companies.our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, to allow timely decisions rega rding required disclosure.
 
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting.  There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) during the fiscal quarter ended April 30,October 31, 2010 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
20


 PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
 Item 1.   Legal Proceedings.
 
    NoneNone.
Item 1A. Risk Factors.Factors
 
There are no material changes from the risk factors previously disclosed in Item 1A to Part I of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended July 31, 2009.2010.
Item 2.    Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.
 
None    None.
Item 3.    Defaults Upon Senior Securities.
 
None    None.
Item 4.    (Removed and Reserved).
 
16

Item 5.   Other Information.Information
 
None    None.
21

Item 6.    Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules.
 
Exhibit
Number
Description
  
31.1*Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 17 CFR 240.13a-14(a), as adopted pursuant to §302§ 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
  
31.2*Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 17 CFR 240.13a-14(a), as adopted pursuant to §302§ 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
  
32.1*Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to §906§ 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
  
32.2*Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to §906§ 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
 
________________


*
Filed herewith.
 
 
2217

 

Signatures

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
 
 
 
CTM Media Holdings, Inc.
    
June 14,December 15, 2010By:/s/    Marc E. Knoller        
  
Marc E. Knoller
Chief Executive Officer and President
    
December 15, 2010 
June 14, 2010By:/s/    Leslie B. Rozner
Leslie B. Rozner
Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Secretary        
   
Leslie B. Rozner
Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Secretary

23
18