As of September 30, 2017,2021, the Fund’s estimated capital commitments related to its oil and gas properties were $5.6$3.1 million (which include asset retirement obligations for the Fund’s projects of $2.8$1.1 million), of which $0.2$0.3 million is expected to be spent during the next twelve months.

Based upon its current cash position, salvage fund and its current reserve estimates, the Fund expects cash flow from operations to be sufficient to cover its commitments and ongoing operations. Reserve estimates are projections based on engineering data that cannot be measured with precision, require substantial judgment, and are subject to frequent revision.

Many aspects of the oil and gas industry are subject to federal, state and local environmental laws and regulations. The Manager and operators of the Fund’s properties are continually taking action they believe appropriate to satisfy applicable federal, state and local environmental regulations. However, due to the significant public and governmental interest in environmental matters related to those activities, the Manager cannot predict the effects of possible future legislation, rule changes, or governmental or private claims. As of September 30, 20172021 and December 31, 2016,2020, there were no known environmental contingencies that required adjustment to, or disclosure in, the Fund’s financial statements.

Oil and gas industry legislation and administrative regulations are periodically changed for a variety of political, economic, and other reasons. Any such future laws and regulations could result in increased compliance costs or additional operating restrictions, which could have a material adverse effect on the Fund’s operating results and cash flows. It is not possible at this time to predict whether such legislation or regulation, if proposed, will be adopted as initially written, if at all, or how legislation or new regulation that may be adopted would impact the Fund’s business.

On July 14, 2016, the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (“BOEM”) issued a Notice to Lessees (“NTL”NTL 2016-N01”) that discontinued and materially replaced existing policies and procedures regarding financial security (i.e. supplemental bonding) for decommissioning obligations of lessees of federal oil and gas leases and owners of pipeline rights-of-way, rights-of userights-of-use and easements on the Outer Continental Shelf (“Lessees”). Generally, the new NTL 2016-N01 (i) ended the practice of excusing Lessees from providing such additional security where co-lessees had sufficient financial strength to meet such decommissioning obligations, (ii) established new criteria for determining financial strength and additional security requirements of such Lessees, (iii) provided acceptable forms of such additional security, and (iv) replaced the waiver system with one of self-insurance. The new rule became effective as of September 12, 2016; however, on January 6, 2017, the BOEM announced that it was suspending the implementation timeline for six months in certain circumstances. On June 22,May 1, 2017, the Secretary of the U.S. Department of the Interior (“Interior”) directed the BOEM announced thatto complete a review of NTL 2016-N01, to provide a report to certain Interior personnel describing the results of the review and options for revising or rescinding NTL 2016-N01, and to keep the implementation timeline extension will remain in effect pending the completion of itsthe review of NTL 2016-N01 by the new NTL.identified Interior personnel. The Fund, as well as other industry participants, are working withBOEM is not currently implementing NTL 2016- N01 and its status is uncertain.

Notwithstanding the uncertain status of NTL 2016-N01, BOEM had continued under existing law to review supplemental financial assurance requirements relative to sole liability properties (i.e., properties in which only one company is liable for decommissioning). However, on August 18, 2021, the BOEM issued a Note to Stakeholders in which the BOEM stated that it was expanding its operatorsfinancial assurance efforts beyond sole liability projects to include “supplemental financial assurance of certain high-risk, non-sole liability properties” (those properties with more than one company potentially liable for decommissioning costs). The BOEM identified (i) inactive properties, (ii) those with less than five years of production left, and working interest partners to determine(iii) those with damaged infrastructure, as being high-risk, non-sole liability properties and agree upon the correct level of decommissioning obligations tofor which theysupplemental financial assurance may be liable and the manner in which such obligations will be secured.required. The impact of the NTL, if enforced without change or amendment,BOEM may require the Fund to fully secure all of its potential abandonment liabilities, to the BOEM’s satisfaction using one or more of the enumerated methods for doing so.  Potentially thiswhich potentially could increase costs to the Fund ifFund.

On October 16, 2020, BOEM and the Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement published a proposed new rule at 85 FR 65904 on Risk, Management, Financial Assurance and Loss Prevention, addressing the streamlining of evaluation criteria when determining whether oil, gas and sulfur leases, right-of-use and easement grant holders, and pipeline right-of-way grant holders may be required to provide bonds or other security above the prescribed amounts for base bonds to ensure compliance with the Lessees’ obligations, primarily decommissioning obligations. The proposed rule was significantly less stringent with respect to financial assurance than NTL 2016-N01. To date, however, Interior has not issued a final rule but has indicated that it is reviewing the proposed rule. The Fund is requirednot able to obtain additional supplemental bonding, fund escrow accountsevaluate the impact of the proposed new rule on its operations or obtain letters of credit.

The Fund is subject to all risks inherent in the oil and natural gas business. Insurance coverage as is customary for entities engaged in similar operations is maintained, but losses may occur from uninsurable risks or amounts in excess of existing insurance coverage. The occurrence of an event that is not insured or not fully insured could have a material adverse impact upon earnings and financial position. Moreover, insurance is obtained as a package covering all of the fundsentities managed by the Manager. Depending on the extent, nature and payment of claims made by the Fund or other fundsentities managed by the Manager, yearly insurance coverage may be exhausted and become insufficient to cover a claim by the Fund in a given year.