UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
 
þ

QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the Quarterly Period Ended September 30, 20172018
OR
 
¨TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from             to                     

Commission File No. 001-31720
PIPER JAFFRAY COMPANIES
(Exact Name of Registrant as specified in its Charter)
DELAWARE 30-0168701
(State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization) (IRS Employer Identification No.)
800 Nicollet Mall, Suite 1000
Minneapolis, Minnesota
 55402
(Address of Principal Executive Offices) (Zip Code)
 (612) 303-6000 
(Registrant’sRegistrant's Telephone Number, Including Area Code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes  þ No  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes  þ No  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of "large accelerated filer," "accelerated filer," "smaller reporting company," and "emerging growth company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filerþ Accelerated filer¨
Non-accelerated filer¨(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)Smaller reporting company¨
   Emerging growth company¨

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act.  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Yes  ¨ No  þ

As of November 1, 2017,October 31, 2018, the registrant had 15,109,13814,827,021 shares of Common Stock outstanding.

 


Piper Jaffray Companies
Index to Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
    
ITEM 1. 
  
  
  
  
  
ITEM 2. 
ITEM 3. 
ITEM 4. 
    
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
    
ITEM 1. 
ITEM 1A. 
ITEM 2. 
ITEM 6. 
  





Table of Contents

PART I.    FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1.    FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
Piper Jaffray Companies
Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition
September 30, December 31,September 30, December 31,
2017 20162018 2017
(Amounts in thousands, except share data)(Unaudited)  (Unaudited)  
Assets      
Cash and cash equivalents$40,916
 $41,359
$68,774
 $33,793
Cash and cash equivalents segregated for regulatory purposes6,016
 29,015
Receivables:   
Customers
 31,917
Brokers, dealers and clearing organizations80,880
 212,730
Securities purchased under agreements to resell
 159,697
Receivables from brokers, dealers and clearing organizations174,065
 145,394
      
Financial instruments and other inventory positions owned763,946
 464,610
635,893
 663,330
Financial instruments and other inventory positions owned and pledged as collateral335,382
 594,361
162,227
 720,047
Total financial instruments and other inventory positions owned1,099,328
 1,058,971
798,120
 1,383,377
      
Fixed assets (net of accumulated depreciation and amortization of $61,312 and $58,308, respectively)24,286
 25,343
Fixed assets (net of accumulated depreciation and amortization of $61,897 and $55,944, respectively)31,267
 25,179
Goodwill81,855
 196,218
81,855
 81,855
Intangible assets (net of accumulated amortization of $81,483 and $70,017, respectively)25,768
 37,234
Intangible assets (net of accumulated amortization of $93,262 and $85,417, respectively)14,989
 22,834
Investments179,527
 168,057
152,380
 176,212
Net deferred income tax assets145,817
 97,833
103,287
 101,205
Other assets55,443
 67,129
68,699
 54,834
Total assets$1,739,836
 $2,125,503
$1,493,436
 $2,024,683
      
Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity   
Liabilities and Shareholders' Equity   
Short-term financing$76,797
 $418,832
$49,957
 $289,937
Senior notes125,000
 175,000
125,000
 125,000
Payables:   
Customers
 29,352
Brokers, dealers and clearing organizations54,265
 40,842
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase
 15,046
Payables to brokers, dealers and clearing organizations6,371
 19,392
Financial instruments and other inventory positions sold, but not yet purchased357,735
 299,357
254,585
 399,227
Accrued compensation288,299
 288,255
252,448
 400,092
Other liabilities and accrued expenses50,955
 42,553
57,660
 49,800
Total liabilities953,051
 1,309,237
746,021
 1,283,448
      
Shareholders’ equity:   
Shareholders' equity:   
Common stock, $0.01 par value:      
Shares authorized: 100,000,000 at September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016;   
Shares issued: 19,512,328 at September 30, 2017 and 19,535,307 at December 31, 2016;   
Shares outstanding: 12,899,902 at September 30, 2017 and 12,391,970 at December 31, 2016195
 195
Shares authorized: 100,000,000 at September 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017;   
Shares issued: 19,517,285 at September 30, 2018 and 19,512,914 at December 31, 2017;   
Shares outstanding: 13,366,703 at September 30, 2018 and 12,911,149 at December 31, 2017195
 195
Additional paid-in capital786,527
 788,927
801,417
 791,970
Retained earnings227,095
 257,188
Less common stock held in treasury, at cost: 6,612,426 at September 30, 2017 and 7,143,337 shares at December 31, 2016(274,089) (284,461)
Retained earnings (1)169,894
 176,270
Less common stock held in treasury, at cost: 6,150,582 shares at September 30, 2018 and 6,601,765 shares at December 31, 2017(270,046) (273,824)
Accumulated other comprehensive loss(1,462) (2,599)(1,249) (1,279)
Total common shareholders’ equity738,266
 759,250
Total common shareholders' equity700,211
 693,332
      
Noncontrolling interests48,519
 57,016
47,204
 47,903
Total shareholders’ equity786,785
 816,266
Total shareholders' equity747,415
 741,235
      
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity$1,739,836
 $2,125,503
Total liabilities and shareholders' equity$1,493,436
 $2,024,683
(1)Includes the cumulative effect adjustment upon adoption of ASU 2014-09, as amended. See Note 2 for further discussion.
See Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

3

Table of Contents
Piper Jaffray Companies
Consolidated Statements of Operations
(Unaudited)

Three Months Ended Nine Months EndedThree Months Ended Nine Months Ended 
September 30, September 30,September 30, September 30, 
(Amounts in thousands, except per share data)2017 2016 2017 20162018 2017 2018 2017 
Revenues:               
Investment banking$190,482
 $136,682
 $461,260
 $338,034
$166,458
 $190,482
 $411,203
 $461,260
 
Institutional brokerage34,873
 42,189
 111,083
 122,423
31,738
 34,873
 92,415
 111,083
 
Asset management12,818
 15,256
 44,011
 43,699
13,377
 12,818
 38,706
 44,011
 
Interest7,164
 7,343
 22,649
 24,094
6,592
 7,164
 25,183
 22,649
 
Investment income/(loss)(422) 4,806
 15,406
 14,019
3,068
 (422) 6,706
 15,406
 
               
Total revenues244,915
 206,276
 654,409
 542,269
221,233
 244,915
 574,213
 654,409
 
               
Interest expense4,348
 5,429
 15,568
 17,383
3,705
 4,348
 14,142
 15,568
 
               
Net revenues240,567
 200,847
 638,841
 524,886
217,528
 240,567
 560,071
 638,841
 
               
Non-interest expenses:               
Compensation and benefits169,469
 135,186
 438,161
 356,770
139,151
 169,469
 369,895
 438,161
 
Outside services7,495
 10,288
 27,612
 28,923
9,521
 7,495
 29,024
 27,612
 
Occupancy and equipment8,127
 8,743
 24,846
 25,311
8,967
 8,127
 26,476
 24,846
 
Communications7,136
 7,845
 22,025
 22,469
7,561
 7,136
 24,112
 22,025
 
Marketing and business development6,683
 7,629
 22,512
 23,804
6,718
 6,683
 21,702
 22,512
 
Deal-related expenses7,671
 
 18,888
 
 
Trade execution and clearance2,125
 2,008
 5,864
 5,686
2,049
 2,125
 6,240
 5,864
 
Restructuring and integration costs
 
 
 10,206
Restructuring costs
 
 3,770
 
 
Goodwill impairment114,363
 
 114,363
 

 114,363
 
 114,363
 
Intangible asset amortization3,822
 8,010
 11,466
 15,400
2,615
 3,822
 7,845
 11,466
 
Back office conversion costs1,293
 
 3,027
 

 1,293
 
 3,027
 
Other operating expenses2,290
 2,687
 8,525
 7,915
3,640
 2,290
 9,187
 8,525
 
               
Total non-interest expenses322,803
 182,396
 678,401
 496,484
187,893
 322,803
 517,139
 678,401
 
               
Income/(loss) before income tax expense/(benefit)(82,236) 18,451
 (39,560) 28,402
29,635
 (82,236) 42,932
 (39,560) 
               
Income tax expense/(benefit)(31,423) 6,515
 (26,912) 8,767
7,365
 (31,423) 5,351
 (26,912) 
               
Net income/(loss)(50,813) 11,936
 (12,648) 19,635
22,270
 (50,813) 37,581
 (12,648) 
               
Net income/(loss) applicable to noncontrolling interests(1,100) 1,278
 3,217
 4,602
247
 (1,100) (1,271) 3,217
 
               
Net income/(loss) applicable to Piper Jaffray Companies$(49,713) $10,658
 $(15,865) $15,033
$22,023
 $(49,713) $38,852
 $(15,865) 
               
Net income/(loss) applicable to Piper Jaffray Companies’ common shareholders$(50,415)
(1) 
$8,582
 $(18,106)
(1) 
$12,476
Net income/(loss) applicable to Piper Jaffray Companies' common shareholders$19,377
 $(50,415)
(1) 
$33,650
 $(18,106)
(1) 
               
Earnings/(loss) per common share               
Basic$(3.91) $0.70
 $(1.42) $0.98
$1.45
 $(3.91) $2.54
 $(1.42) 
Diluted$(3.91)
(2) 
$0.70
 $(1.42)
(2) 
$0.97
$1.43
 $(3.91)
(2) 
$2.50
 $(1.42)
(2) 
               
Dividends declared per common share$0.31
 $
 $0.94
 $
$0.38
 $0.31
 $2.75
 $0.94
 
               
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding               
Basic12,898
 12,282
 12,774
 12,787
13,343
 12,898
 13,248
 12,774
 
Diluted12,975
(2) 
12,298
 12,945
(2) 
12,801
13,508
 12,975
(2) 
13,444
 12,945
(2) 
                     
(1)No allocation of undistributed income was made due to loss position. See Note 17.
(1) No allocation of undistributed income was made due to loss position. See Note 14.
(2)Earnings per diluted common share is calculated using the basic weighted average number of common shares outstanding for periods in which a loss is incurred.
See Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

4

Table of Contents
Piper Jaffray Companies
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income
(Unaudited)

Three Months Ended Nine Months EndedThree Months Ended Nine Months Ended
September 30, September 30,September 30, September 30,
(Amounts in thousands)2017 2016 2017 20162018 2017 2018 2017
Net income/(loss)$(50,813) $11,936
 $(12,648) $19,635
$22,270
 $(50,813) $37,581
 $(12,648)
              
Other comprehensive income/(loss), net of tax:              
Foreign currency translation adjustment142
 (587) 1,137
 (1,843)(102) 142
 30
 1,137
              
Comprehensive income/(loss)(50,671) 11,349
 (11,511) 17,792
22,168
 (50,671) 37,611
 (11,511)
              
Comprehensive income/(loss) applicable to noncontrolling interests(1,100) 1,278
 3,217
 4,602
247
 (1,100) (1,271) 3,217
              
Comprehensive income/(loss) applicable to Piper Jaffray Companies$(49,571) $10,071
 $(14,728) $13,190
$21,921
 $(49,571) $38,882
 $(14,728)

See Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements


5

Table of Contents
Piper Jaffray Companies
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(Unaudited)

Nine Months EndedNine Months Ended
September 30,September 30,
(Dollars in thousands)2017 20162018 2017
      
Operating Activities:      
Net income/(loss)$(12,648) $19,635
$37,581
 $(12,648)
Adjustments to reconcile net income/(loss) to net cash provided by operating activities:      
Depreciation and amortization of fixed assets5,343
 4,724
6,199
 5,343
Deferred income taxes(47,984) 715
(2,082) (47,984)
Stock-based and deferred compensation26,459
 43,839
Stock-based compensation32,046
 26,459
Goodwill impairment114,363
 

 114,363
Amortization of intangible assets11,466
 15,400
7,845
 11,466
Amortization of forgivable loans5,207
 6,894
3,789
 5,207
Decrease/(increase) in operating assets:      
Cash and cash equivalents segregated for regulatory purposes22,999
 35,000
Receivables:      
Customers31,917
 (46,398)
 31,917
Brokers, dealers and clearing organizations131,850
 (21,478)(28,671) 131,850
Securities purchased under agreements to resell159,697
 (10,492)
 159,697
Net financial instruments and other inventory positions owned18,021
 (72,758)440,615
 18,021
Investments(11,470) (4,767)23,832
 (11,470)
Other assets7,185
 (8,898)(17,439) 7,185
Increase/(decrease) in operating liabilities:      
Payables:      
Customers(29,352) 13,366

 (29,352)
Brokers, dealers and clearing organizations13,423
 153,795
(13,021) 13,423
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase(15,046) (2,018)
 (15,046)
Accrued compensation4,666
 (51,569)(134,470) 4,666
Other liabilities and accrued expenses7,864
 (32,005)4,178
 7,864
      
Net cash provided by operating activities443,960
 42,985
360,402
 420,961
      
Investing Activities:      
Business acquisitions, net of cash acquired
 (71,019)
Purchases of fixed assets, net(4,310) (7,360)(12,329) (4,310)
      
Net cash used in investing activities(4,310) (78,379)(12,329) (4,310)
      
Continued on next page

6

Table of Contents
Piper Jaffray Companies
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows – Continued
(Unaudited)

Nine Months EndedNine Months Ended
September 30,September 30,
(Dollars in thousands)2017 20162018 2017
      
Financing Activities:      
Decrease in short-term financing$(342,035) $(20,405)$(239,980) $(342,035)
Repayment of variable rate senior notes(50,000) 
Decrease in securities sold under agreements to repurchase
 (21,292)
Repayment of senior notes
 (50,000)
Payment of cash dividend(14,217) 
(41,631) (14,217)
Increase/(decrease) in noncontrolling interests(11,714) 10,189
572
 (11,714)
Repurchase of common stock(25,065) (70,428)(31,664) (25,065)
Proceeds from stock option exercises1,703
 119

 1,703
      
Net cash used in financing activities(441,328) (101,817)(312,703) (441,328)
      
Currency adjustment:      
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash1,235
 (1,328)(389) 1,235
      
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents(443) (138,539)
Net increase/(decrease) in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash (1)34,981
 (23,442)
      
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period41,359
 189,910
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash at beginning of period (1)33,793
 70,374
      
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period$40,916
 $51,371
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash at end of period (1)$68,774
 $46,932
      
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information –      
Cash paid during the period for:      
Interest$15,397
 $17,679
$14,586
 $15,397
Income taxes$7,781
 $22,148
$16,638
 $7,781
   
Non-cash investing activities –   
Issuance of common stock related to the acquisition of Simmons & Company International:   
25,525 shares for the nine months ended September 30, 2016$
 $1,074
   
Non-cash financing activities –   
Issuance of restricted common stock for annual equity award:   
198,981 shares and 843,889 shares for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively$16,187
 $35,089

(1)Upon adoption of ASU 2016-18, restricted cash includes cash and cash equivalents previously segregated for regulatory purposes. See Note 2 for further discussion.
See Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements


7

Table of Contents
Piper Jaffray Companies
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)


Index
Note 1 
Note 2 
Note 3
Note 4 
Note 54 
Note 65 
Note 76 
Note 7
Note 8
Note 9
Note 10 
Note 911 
Note 1012 
Note 1113
Note 12 
Note 13
Note 14
Note 15
Note 16
Note 17 
Note 1815 
Note 1916 
Note 2017 
Note 18


8

Table of Contents
Piper Jaffray Companies
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)

Note 1 Organization and Basis of Presentation

Organization

Piper Jaffray Companies is the parent company of Piper Jaffray & Co. ("Piper Jaffray"), a securities broker dealer and investment banking firm; Piper Jaffray Ltd., a firm providing securities brokerage and mergers and acquisitions services in Europe; Piper Jaffray Finance LLC, which facilitates corporate debt underwriting in conjunction with affiliated credit vehicles; Advisory Research, Inc. ("ARI"), which provides asset management services to separately managed accounts, closed-end and open-end funds and partnerships; Piper Jaffray Investment Group Inc., and PJC Capital Management LLC, which consistsconsist of entities providing alternative asset management services; Piper Jaffray Financial Products Inc. and Piper Jaffray Financial Products II Inc., entities that facilitate derivative transactions; and other immaterial subsidiaries.

Effective August 7, 2017, Piper Jaffray transitioned from a self clearing securities broker dealer to a fully disclosed clearing model. Pershing LLC ("Pershing") is Piper Jaffray's clearing broker dealer responsible for the clearance and settlement of firm and customer cash and security transactions.

Piper Jaffray Companies and its subsidiaries (collectively, the "Company") operate in two reporting segments: Capital Markets and Asset Management. A summary of the activities of each of the Company’sCompany's business segments is as follows:

Capital Markets

The Capital Markets segment provides investment banking services and institutional sales, trading and research services. Investment banking services include financial advisory services, management of and participation in underwritings financial advisory services and public finance activities. Revenues are generated through the receipt of advisory and financing fees. Institutional sales, trading and research services focus on the trading of equity and fixed income products with institutions, government and non-profit entities. Revenues are generated through commissions and sales credits earned on equity and fixed income institutional sales activities, net interest revenues on trading securities held in inventory, and profits and losses from trading these securities. Also, the Company generates revenue through strategic trading and investing activities, which focus on investments in municipal bonds, U.S. government agency securities, and merchant banking activities involving equity or debt investments in late stage private companies. The Company has created alternative asset management funds in merchant banking, energy and senior living in order to invest firm capital and to manage capital from outside investors. The Company receives management and performance fees for managing these funds.

Asset Management

The Asset Management segment provides traditional asset management services with product offerings in equity securities and master limited partnerships and equity securities to institutions and individuals. Revenues are generated in the form of management and performance fees. Revenues are also generated through investments in the partnerships and funds that the Company manages.

Basis of Presentation

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles ("U.S. GAAP") for interim financial information and the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC"). Pursuant to this guidance, certain information and disclosures have been omitted that are included within complete annual financial statements. Except as disclosed herein, there have been no material changes in the information reported in the financial statements and related disclosures in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016.2017.

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Piper Jaffray Companies, its wholly owned subsidiaries, and all other entities in which the Company has a controlling financial interest. Noncontrolling interests represent equity interests in consolidated entities that are not attributable, either directly or indirectly, to Piper Jaffray Companies. Noncontrolling interests include the minority equity holders’holders' proportionate share of the equity in the Company's alternative asset management funds. All material intercompany balances have been eliminated.

Management is required to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Although these estimates and assumptions are based on the best information available, actual results could differ from those estimates.


9

Table of Contents
Piper Jaffray Companies
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)

Note 2 Accounting Policies and Pronouncements

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Refer to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 20162017 for a full description of the Company's significant accounting policies. Changes to the Company's significant accounting policies are described below.

Stock-Based CompensationRevenue Recognition

Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") Accounting Standards Codification Topic 718, "Compensation Investment Banking Stock Compensation," ("ASC 718") requires all stock-based compensation to be expensed Investment banking revenues, which include advisory and underwriting fees, are recorded when the performance obligation for the transaction is satisfied under the terms of each engagement. Expenses associated with such transactions are deferred until the related revenue is recognized or the engagement is otherwise concluded. Investment banking revenues are presented gross of related client reimbursed deal expenses. Expenses for completed deals are reported separately in deal-related expenses on the consolidated statements of operationsoperations. Expenses related to investment banking deals not completed are recognized as non-interest expenses on the consolidated statements of operations.

The Company's advisory fees generally consist of a nonrefundable up-front fee and a success fee. The nonrefundable fee is recorded as deferred revenue upon receipt and recognized at a point in time when the performance obligation is satisfied, or when the transaction is deemed by management to be terminated. Management's judgment is required in determining when a transaction is considered to be terminated.

The substantial majority of the Company's advisory and underwriting fees (i.e., the success related advisory fee) are considered variable consideration and recognized when it is probable that the variable consideration will not be reversed in a future period. The variable consideration is considered to be constrained until satisfaction of the performance obligation. The Company's performance obligation is generally satisfied at a point in time upon the closing of a strategic transaction, completion of a financing or underwriting arrangement, or some other defined outcome (e.g., providing a fairness opinion). At this time, the Company has transferred control of the promised service and the customer obtains control. As these arrangements represent a single performance obligation, allocation of the transaction price is not necessary. The Company has elected to apply the following optional exemptions regarding disclosure of its remaining performance obligations: (i) the Company's performance obligation is part of a contract that has an original expected duration of one year or less and/or (ii) the variable consideration is allocated entirely to a wholly unsatisfied promise to transfer a distinct service that forms part of a single performance obligation.

Institutional Brokerage Institutional brokerage revenues include (i) commissions received from customers for the execution of brokerage transactions in listed and over-the-counter (OTC) equity, fixed income and convertible debt securities, which are recognized at a point in time on the trade date because the customer has obtained the rights to the underlying security provided by the trade execution service, (ii) trading gains and losses, recorded on changes in the fair value of long and short security positions in the reporting period and (iii) fees received by the Company for equity research, which are generally recognized in the period received. The Company permits institutional customers to allocate a portion of their gross commissions to pay for research products and other services provided by third parties. The amounts allocated for those purposes are commonly referred to as soft dollar arrangements. As the Company is not acting as a principal in satisfying the performance obligation for these arrangements, expenses relating to soft dollars are netted against commission revenues and included in other liabilities and accrued expenses on the consolidated statements of financial condition.

Asset Management Asset management fees include revenues the Company receives in connection with management and investment advisory services performed for separately managed accounts and various funds and partnerships. The performance obligation related to the transfer of these services is satisfied over time and the related fees are recognized under the output method, which reflects the fees that the Company has a right to invoice based on the grant date fair valueservices provided during the period. Fees are defined in client contracts as a percentage of portfolio assets under management. Amounts related to remaining performance obligations are not disclosed as the Company applies the output method.


10

Table of Contents
Piper Jaffray Companies
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)

Asset management revenues may also include performance fees. Performance fees, if earned, are recognized when it is probable that such revenue will not be reversed in a future period. For the Company's alternative asset management funds, management will consider such factors as the remaining assets and residual life of the award. Compensation expense relatedfund to stock-based awardsconclude whether it is probable that doa significant reversal of revenue will not require future serviceoccur in the future. For the Company's traditional asset management funds, performance fees are earned when the investment return on assets under management exceeds certain benchmark targets or other performance targets over a specified measurement period (e.g., monthly, quarterly or annually). These performance fees are typically annual performance hurdles and recognized in the fourth quarter of the applicable year, in which the awards were deemed to be earned. Stock-based awards that require future service are amortized over the relevant service period. Forfeitures of awards with service conditions are accounted for when they occur. or upon client liquidation.

See Note 1615 for additional information on the Company's accounting for stock-based compensation.revenues from contracts with customers disaggregated by major business activity.

Adoption of New Accounting Standards

Stock-Based Compensation

In March 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standard Update ("ASU") No. 2016-09, "Compensation – Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting" ("ASU 2016-09"). ASU 2016-09 made targeted amendments to the accounting for share-based payments to employees. It became effective for the Company as of January 1, 2017. There was no impact to the Company’s retained earnings upon adoption of ASU 2016-09.

Under ASU 2016-09, the Company recognizes the income tax effects of stock awards in the income statement when the awards vest or are settled. For the nine months ended September 30, 2017, this accounting change resulted in the recording of a $9.1 million tax benefit for stock awards vesting during the period. Prior to the adoption of this ASU, this amount would have been recorded directly to additional paid-in capital. In addition, the Company has elected to account for forfeitures of awards with service conditions as they occur. This will result in dividends originally charged against retained earnings for forfeited, unvested stock-based payment awards to be reclassified to compensation expense in the period in which the forfeiture occurs. Furthermore, tax impacts from the vesting of stock-based compensation are presented as an operating activity on the consolidated statements of cash flows on a prospective basis.

Goodwill Impairment

In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-04, "Intangibles – Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment" ("ASU 2017-04"). ASU 2017-04 eliminates the requirement to calculate the implied fair value of goodwill (i.e., perform a hypothetical purchase price allocation) to measure a goodwill impairment charge. Instead, entities will record an impairment charge based on the excess of a reporting unit’s carrying amount over its fair value. ASU 2017-04 is effective for the Company’s annual and any interim goodwill impairment tests in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019 and should be applied prospectively. Early adoption is permitted for interim and annual goodwill impairment testing dates after January 1, 2017. The Company adopted ASU 2017-04 effective July 1, 2017.

Future Adoption of New Applicable Accounting Standards

Revenue Recognition

In May 2014, the FASBFinancial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued ASUAccounting Standards Update ("ASU") No. 2014-09, "Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606)," ("ASU 2014-09"), which supersedes currentprevious revenue recognition guidance, including most industry-specific guidance. ASU 2014-09, as amended, requires a company to recognize revenue when it transfers promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the company expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods and services, and also requires enhanced disclosures.


10

TableThe Company adopted this guidance effective as of Contents
Piper Jaffray Companies
NotesJanuary 1, 2018 under the modified retrospective method, in which the cumulative effect of applying the standard was recognized at the date of initial application. The cumulative effect adjustment that the Company recognized upon adoption as of January 1, 2018 was a decrease to retained earnings of $3.6 million, net of tax. The Company applied the Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
guidance only to those contracts that were not completed at the date of initial application.

The Company has identified its revenues and costs that are within the scope of the new guidance. The currentprevious broker dealer industry treatment of netting deal expenses with investment banking revenues will changewas superseded under the new guidance. As a result of adopting ASU 2014-09, the Company will generally presentnow presents investment banking revenues gross of related client reimbursed deal expenses on a gross basisand deal-related expenses as non-interest expenses on the consolidated statements of operations, rather than the currentprevious presentation of netting deal expenses incurred for completed investment banking deals within revenues. This change will not impact earnings, however,For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2018, the Company will reportreported higher investment banking revenues and higher non-compensation expenses.expenses of $7.7 million and $18.9 million, respectively. This change did not impact earnings. In addition, the Company expects to defernow defers the recognition of performance fees on its merchant banking, energy and senior living alternative asset management funds until such fees are no longer subject to reversal, which will cause a delay in the recognition of these fees as revenue. TheFor the nine months ended September 30, 2018, the amount of asset management revenue from performance fees that the Company anticipates that its currentwould have recognized if not for this change was not material. With the exception of the above, the Company's previous methods of recognizing investment banking revenues willwere not be significantly impacted by the new guidance.

The AICPA industry task forces on broker dealers and asset management, the AICPA’s Revenue Recognition Working Group and the AICPA’s Financial Reporting Executive Committee (FinREC) continue to issue interpretive guidance on ASU 2014-09. The Company will continue to evaluate the potential impact of this guidance.

The Company will adopt this guidance effective as of January 1, 2018 under the modified retrospective method, in which the cumulative effect of applying the standard will be recognized at the date of initial application. As of September 30, 2017, the estimated cumulative effect that the Company would recognize as an adjustment to retained earnings upon adoption will be less than $2 million, net of tax.

Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities

In January 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-01, "Financial Instruments – Overall (Subtopic 825-10): Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities" ("ASU 2016-01"). The amendments in ASU 2016-01 address certain aspects of the recognition, measurement, presentation and disclosure of financial instruments. ASU 2016-01 isbecame effective for annual and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2017. Except for the early application guidance outlined in ASU 2016-01, early adoption is not permitted. The adoptionCompany as of ASU 2016-01 is not expected to have aJanuary 1, 2018. There was no material impact onto the Company's results of operations, or financial position but may impactor disclosures upon adoption as the Company's disclosures.financial instruments are already recorded at fair value.
Statement of Cash Flows

In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-15, "Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments" ("ASU 2016-15"). ASU 2016-15 clarifies how entities should classify certain cash receipts and cash payments on the statement of cash flows. The amendments in ASU 2016-15 became effective for the Company as of January 1, 2018, with retrospective application. There was no material impact to the Company's presentation of its consolidated statements of cash flows upon adoption of ASU 2016-15.


11

Table of Contents
Piper Jaffray Companies
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)

In November 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-18, "Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Restricted Cash" ("ASU 2016-18"). Under ASU 2016-18, restricted cash will be included with cash and cash equivalents when reconciling the beginning-of-period and end-of-period amounts shown on the consolidated statements of cash flows. ASU 2016-18 became effective for the Company as of January 1, 2018, with retrospective application. As a registered broker dealer, Piper Jaffray is subject to Rule 15c3-3 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, which requires broker dealers carrying customer accounts to maintain cash or qualified securities in a segregated reserve account for the exclusive benefit of its customers. These accounts were previously classified as cash and cash equivalents segregated for regulatory purposes on the consolidated statements of financial condition. Subsequent to transitioning to a fully disclosed clearing model in 2017, Piper Jaffray no longer carries customer accounts and is no longer subject to Rule 15c3-3. The following table provides a reconciliation of cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash for all periods presented on the consolidated statements of cash flows:
 December 31, September 30, December 31,
(Dollars in thousands)2017 2017 2016
Cash and cash equivalents$33,793
 $40,916
 $41,359
Cash and cash equivalents segregated for regulatory purposes
 6,016
 29,015
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash$33,793
 $46,932
 $70,374

Future Adoption of New Applicable Accounting Standards

Leases

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, "Leases (Topic 842)" ("ASU 2016-02"). ASU 2016-02 requires lessees to recognize a right-of-use asset and lease liability on the consolidated statements of financial position and disclose key information about leasing arrangements. The recognition, measurement and presentation of expenses and cash flows arising from a lease by a lessee have not significantly changed from current U.S. GAAP. ASU 2016-02 is effective for annual and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2018.the Company as of January 1, 2019. As of December 31, 2016,September 30, 2018, the Company had approximately 65 operating leases for office space with aggregate minimum lease commitments of $78.4$71.1 million. Upon adoption, lease commitments will be reflected on the statement of financial condition as a right-of-use asset and a lease commitment liability. The Company is evaluating other service contracts which may include embedded leases.has identified its arrangements that are within the scope of the new guidance, and continues to evaluate their potential impact on the consolidated statements of financial condition and related disclosures. Upon adoption of ASU 2016-02, the Company does not expect material changes to the recognition of rent expense in its consolidated statements of operations. The impact of the new guidance onis not expected to materially impact Piper Jaffray’sJaffray's net capital is expected to be minimal.position.

Financial Instruments Credit Losses

In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-13, "Financial Instruments – Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments" ("ASU 2016-13"). The new guidance requires an entity to measure all expected credit losses for financial assets held at the reporting date based on historical experience, current conditions, and reasonable and supportable forecasts as opposed to delaying recognition until the loss was probable of occurring. ASU 2016-13 is effective for annual and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2019. Early adoption is permitted for annual and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2018. The Company does not expect the adoption of ASU 2016-13 to have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.


11

Table of Contents
Piper Jaffray Companies
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)

Statement of Cash Flows

In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-15, "Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments" ("ASU 2016-15"). ASU 2016-15 clarifies how entities should classify certain cash receipts and cash payments on the statement of cash flows. The amendments in ASU 2016-15 are effective for annual and interim periods beginning after December 31, 2017 and should be applied retrospectively. Early adoption is permitted. The Company expects that only a limited number of amendments will impact the presentation of its consolidated statements of cash flows.

In November 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-18, "Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Restricted Cash" ("ASU 2016-18"). Under ASU 2016-18, restricted cash will be included with cash and cash equivalents when reconciling the beginning-of-period and end-of-period amounts shown on the consolidated statements of cash flows. ASU 2016-18 is effective for annual and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2017 and should be applied retrospectively. Early adoption is permitted.

Note 3Acquisition of Simmons & Company International

On February 26, 2016, the Company completed the acquisition of Simmons & Company International ("Simmons"), an employee-owned investment bank and broker dealer focused on the energy industry. The economic value of the acquisition was approximately $140.0 million.

The Company acquired net assets with a fair value of $119.3 million. As part of the purchase price, the Company issued 1,149,340 restricted shares valued at $48.2 million as equity consideration on the acquisition date. Employees must fulfill service requirements in exchange for the rights to the shares. Compensation expense will be amortized on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period of one or three years (a weighted average service period of 2.7 years). The fair value of the restricted stock was determined using the market price of the Company's common stock on the date of the acquisition.

The Company also entered into acquisition-related compensation arrangements with certain employees of $20.6 million which consisted of cash ($9.0 million) and restricted stock ($11.6 million) for retention purposes. Compensation expense related to these arrangements will be amortized on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period of three years. Additional cash compensation may be available to certain investment banking employees subject to exceeding an investment banking revenue threshold during the three year post-acquisition period to the extent they are employed by the Company at the time of payment. Amounts estimated to be payable related to this performance award plan will be recorded as compensation expense on the consolidated statements of operations over the requisite performance period of three years. As of September 30, 2017, the Company had accrued $14.4 million related to this performance award plan.

The acquisition was accounted for pursuant to FASB Accounting Standards Codification Topic 805, "Business Combinations." Accordingly, the purchase price was allocated to the acquired assets and liabilities assumed based on their estimated fair values as of the acquisition date. The excess of the purchase price over the net assets acquired was allocated between goodwill and intangible assets within the Capital Markets segment. The Company recorded $60.7 million of goodwill on its consolidated statements of financial condition, of which $59.4 million is expected to be deductible for income tax purposes. In management's opinion, the goodwill represents the reputation and operating expertise of Simmons.

Identifiable intangible assets purchased by the Company consisted of customer relationships and the Simmons trade name with acquisition-date fair values of $17.5 million and $9.1 million, respectively. Transaction costs of $0.9 million were incurred for the nine months ended September 30, 2016, and are included in restructuring and integration costs on the consolidated statements of operations.


12

Table of Contents
Piper Jaffray Companies
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)

Simmons’ results of operations have been included in the Company's consolidated financial statements prospectively beginning on the date of acquisition. The acquisition has been fully integrated with the Company's existing operations. Accordingly, post-acquisition revenues and net income are not discernible. The following unaudited pro forma financial data assumes the acquisition had occurred on January 1, 2015, the beginning of the prior annual period in which the acquisition occurred. Pro forma results have been prepared by adjusting the Company's historical results to include Simmons' results of operations adjusted for the following changes: amortization expense was adjusted to account for the acquisition-date fair value of intangible assets; compensation and benefits expenses were adjusted to reflect such expenses based on the Company’s compensation arrangements and the restricted stock issued as equity consideration; and the income tax effect of applying the Company's statutory tax rates to Simmons’ results of operations. The Company's unaudited pro forma information presented does not necessarily reflect the results of operations that would have resulted had the acquisition been completed at the beginning of the applicable period presented, does not contemplate anticipated operational efficiencies of the combined entities, nor does it indicate the results of operations in future periods.
  Nine Months Ended
(Dollars in thousands) September 30, 2016
Net revenues $532,683
Net income applicable to Piper Jaffray Companies 15,642


13

Table of Contents
Piper Jaffray Companies
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)

Note 43 Financial Instruments and Other Inventory Positions Owned and Financial Instruments and Other Inventory Positions Sold, but Not Yet Purchased

September 30, December 31,September 30, December 31,
(Dollars in thousands)2017 20162018 2017
Financial instruments and other inventory positions owned:      
Corporate securities:      
Equity securities$66,904
 $6,363
$21,473
 $51,896
Convertible securities70,900
 103,486
126,641
 74,456
Fixed income securities27,480
 21,018
42,976
 30,145
Municipal securities:      
Taxable securities37,073
 63,090
41,766
 67,699
Tax-exempt securities374,348
 559,329
226,702
 744,241
Short-term securities177,873
 35,175
150,090
 62,251
Mortgage-backed securities4,321
 5,638
16
 481
U.S. government agency securities300,832
 205,685
173,477
 317,318
U.S. government securities17,205
 29,970
1,561
 9,317
Derivative contracts22,392
 29,217
13,418
 25,573
Total financial instruments and other inventory positions owned1,099,328
 1,058,971
$798,120
 $1,383,377
      
Less noncontrolling interests (1)
 (57,700)
$1,099,328
 $1,001,271
   
Financial instruments and other inventory positions sold, but not yet purchased:      
Corporate securities:      
Equity securities$100,403
 $89,453
$116,712
 $101,517
Fixed income securities21,149
 17,324
31,187
 30,292
U.S. government agency securities26,703
 6,723
37,245
 49,077
U.S. government securities203,995
 180,650
65,205
 213,312
Derivative contracts5,485
 5,207
4,236
 5,029
Total financial instruments and other inventory positions sold, but not yet purchased357,735
 299,357
$254,585
 $399,227
   
Less noncontrolling interests (2)
 (631)
$357,735
 $298,726
(1)
Noncontrolling interests attributable to third party ownership in a consolidated municipal bond fund consist of $1.3 million of taxable municipal securities, $55.2 million of tax-exempt municipal securities, and $1.2 million of derivative contracts as of December 31, 2016
(2)
Noncontrolling interests attributable to third party ownership in a consolidated municipal bond fund consist of U.S. government securities as of December 31, 2016.

At September 30, 20172018 and December 31, 20162017, financial instruments and other inventory positions owned in the amount of $335.4162.2 million and $594.4720.0 million, respectively, had been pledged as collateral for short-term financings and repurchase agreements.financings.

Financial instruments and other inventory positions sold, but not yet purchased represent obligations of the Company to deliver the specified security at the contracted price, thereby creating a liability to purchase the security in the market at prevailing prices. The Company is obligated to acquire the securities sold short at prevailing market prices, which may exceed the amount reflected on the consolidated statements of financial condition. The Company economically hedges changes in the market value of its financial instruments and other inventory positions owned using inventory positions sold, but not yet purchased, interest rate derivatives, credit default swap index contracts, U.S. treasury bond futures and exchange traded options.


14

Table of Contents
Piper Jaffray Companies
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)

Derivative Contract Financial Instruments

The Company uses interest rate swaps, interest rate locks, credit default swap index contracts, U.S. treasury bond futures and equity option contracts as a means to manage risk in certain inventory positions. The Company also enters into interest rate swaps to facilitate customer transactions. The following describes the Company’sCompany's derivatives by the type of transaction or security the instruments are economically hedging.

Customer matched-book derivatives: The Company enters into interest rate derivative contracts in a principal capacity as a dealer to satisfy the financial needs of its customers. The Company simultaneously enters into an interest rate derivative contract with a third party for the same notional amount to hedge the interest rate and credit risk of the initial client interest rate derivative contract. In certain limited instances, the Company has only hedged interest rate risk with a third party, and retains uncollateralized credit risk as described below. The instruments use interest rates based upon either the London Interbank Offer Rate ("LIBOR") index or the Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association ("SIFMA") index.

13

Table of Contents
Piper Jaffray Companies
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)

Trading securities derivatives: The Company enters into interest rate derivative contracts and uses U.S. treasury bond futures to hedge interest rate and market value risks associated with its fixed income securities. These instruments use interest rates based upon either the Municipal Market Data ("MMD") index, LIBOR or the SIFMA index. The Company also enters into credit default swap index contracts to hedge credit risk associated with its taxable fixed income securities and option contracts to hedge market value risk associated with its convertible securities.

Derivatives are reported on a net basis by counterparty (i.e., the net payable or receivable for derivative assets and liabilities for a given counterparty) when a legal right of offset exists and on a net basis by cross product when applicable provisions are stated in master netting agreements. Cash collateral received or paid is netted on a counterparty basis, provided a legal right of offset exists. The total absolute notional contract amount, representing the absolute value of the sum of gross long and short derivative contracts, provides an indication of the volume of the Company's derivative activity and does not represent gains and losses. The following table presents the gross fair market value and the total absolute notional contract amount of the Company's outstanding derivative instruments, prior to counterparty netting, by asset or liability position:
 September 30, 2017 December 31, 2016 September 30, 2018 December 31, 2017
(Dollars in thousands) Derivative Derivative Notional Derivative Derivative Notional Derivative Derivative Notional��Derivative Derivative Notional
Derivative Category Assets (1) Liabilities (2) Amount Assets (1) Liabilities (2) Amount Assets (1) Liabilities (2) Amount Assets (1) Liabilities (2) Amount
Interest rate                        
Customer matched-book $270,149
 $255,102
 $3,178,725
 $288,955
 $272,819
 $3,330,207
 $159,244
 $147,944
 $2,602,498
 $239,224
 $225,890
 $2,819,006
Trading securities 686
 4,456
 345,850
 13,952
 1,707
 423,550
 1,714
 368
 243,175
 126
 4,459
 399,450
Credit default swap index            
Equity options            
Trading securities 
 
 
 
 127
 7,470
 
 
 
 6
 
 9,635
 $270,835
 $259,558
 $3,524,575
 $302,907
 $274,653
 $3,761,227
 $160,958
 $148,312
 $2,845,673
 $239,356
 $230,349
 $3,228,091
(1)Derivative assets are included within financial instruments and other inventory positions owned on the consolidated statements of financial condition.
(2)Derivative liabilities are included within financial instruments and other inventory positions sold, but not yet purchased on the consolidated statements of financial condition.


15

Table of Contents
Piper Jaffray Companies
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)

The Company’sCompany's derivative contracts do not qualify for hedge accounting, therefore, unrealized gains and losses are recorded on the consolidated statements of operations. The gains and losses on the related economically hedged inventory positions are not disclosed below as they are not in qualifying hedging relationships. The following table presents the Company’sCompany's unrealized gains/(losses) on derivative instruments:
 Three Months Ended Nine Months Ended Three Months Ended Nine Months Ended
(Dollars in thousands)   September 30, September 30,   September 30, September 30,
Derivative Category  Operations Category 2017 2016 2017 2016 Operations Category 2018 2017 2018 2017
Interest rate derivative contract Investment banking $(300) $(1,901) $(1,076) $(3,953) Investment banking $(301) $(300) $(1,567) $(1,076)
Interest rate derivative contract Institutional brokerage 1,627
 8,438
 (16,028) 819
 Institutional brokerage 980
 1,627
 5,212
 (16,028)
Credit default swap index contract Institutional brokerage 4,304
 74
 4,482
 3,958
 Institutional brokerage 
 4,304
 
 4,482
Futures and equity option derivative contracts Institutional brokerage 
 107
 
 255
 $5,631
 $6,718
 $(12,622) $1,079
 $679
 $5,631
 $3,645
 $(12,622)

Credit risk associated with the Company’sCompany's derivatives is the risk that a derivative counterparty will not perform in accordance with the terms of the applicable derivative contract. Credit exposure associated with the Company’sCompany's derivatives is driven by uncollateralized market movements in the fair value of the contracts with counterparties and is monitored regularly by the Company’sCompany's financial risk committee. The Company considers counterparty credit risk in determining derivative contract fair value. The majority of the Company’sCompany's derivative contracts are substantially collateralized by its counterparties, who are major financial institutions. The Company has a limited number of counterparties who are not required to post collateral. Based on market movements, the uncollateralized amounts representing the fair value of the derivative contract can become material, exposing the Company to the credit risk of these counterparties. As of September 30, 20172018, the Company had $20.813.5 million of uncollateralized credit exposure with these counterparties (notional contract amount of $181.8178.6 million), including $15.410.8 million of uncollateralized credit exposure with one counterparty.


14

Table of Contents
Piper Jaffray Companies
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)

Note 54 Fair Value of Financial Instruments

Based on the nature of the Company’sCompany's business and its role as a "dealer" in the securities industry or as a manager of alternative asset management funds, the fair values of its financial instruments are determined internally. The Company’sCompany's processes are designed to ensure that the fair values used for financial reporting are based on observable inputs wherever possible. In the event that observable inputs are not available, unobservable inputs are developed based on an evaluation of all relevant empirical market data, including prices evidenced by market transactions, interest rates, credit spreads, volatilities and correlations and other security-specific information. Valuation adjustments related to illiquidity or counterparty credit risk are also considered. In estimating fair value, the Company may utilize information provided by third party pricing vendors to corroborate internally-developed fair value estimates.

The Company employs specific control processes to determine the reasonableness of the fair value of its financial instruments. The Company’sCompany's processes are designed to ensure that the internally-estimated fair values are accurately recorded and that the data inputs and the valuation techniques used are appropriate, consistently applied, and that the assumptions are reasonable and consistent with the objective of determining fair value. Individuals outside of the trading departments perform independent pricing verification reviews as of each reporting date. The Company has established parameters which set forth when the fair value of securities are independently verified. The selection parameters are generally based upon the type of security, the level of estimation risk of a security, the materiality of the security to the Company’sCompany's financial statements, changes in fair value from period to period, and other specific facts and circumstances of the Company’sCompany's securities portfolio. In evaluating the initial internally-estimated fair values made by the Company’sCompany's traders, the nature and complexity of securities involved (e.g., term, coupon, collateral, and other key drivers of value), level of market activity for securities, and availability of market data are considered. The independent price verification procedures include, but are not limited to, analysis of trade data (both internal and external where available), corroboration to the valuation of positions with similar characteristics, risks and components, or comparison to an alternative pricing source, such as a discounted cash flow model. The Company’sCompany's valuation committee, comprised of members of senior management and risk management, provides oversight and overall responsibility for the internal control processes and procedures related to fair value measurements.


16

Table of Contents
Piper Jaffray Companies
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)

The following is a description of the valuation techniques used to measure fair value.

Cash Equivalents

Cash equivalents include highly liquid investments with original maturities of 90 days or less. Actively traded money market funds are measured at their net asset value and classified as Level I.

Financial Instruments and Other Inventory Positions Owned

The Company records financial instruments and other inventory positions owned and financial instruments and other inventory positions sold, but not yet purchased at fair value on the consolidated statements of financial condition with unrealized gains and losses reflected on the consolidated statements of operations.

Equity securities – Exchange traded equity securities are valued based on quoted prices from the exchange for identical assets or liabilities as of the period-end date. To the extent these securities are actively traded and valuation adjustments are not applied, they are categorized as Level I. Non-exchange traded equity securities (principally hybrid preferred securities) are measured primarily using broker quotations, prices observed for recently executed market transactions and internally-developed fair value estimates based on observable inputs and are categorized within Level II of the fair value hierarchy.

Convertible securities – Convertible securities are valued based on observable trades, when available. Accordingly, these convertible securities are categorized as Level II.

Corporate fixed income securities – Fixed income securities include corporate bonds which are valued based on recently executed market transactions of comparable size, internally-developed fair value estimates based on observable inputs, or broker quotations. Accordingly, these corporate bonds are categorized as Level II.

Taxable municipal securities – Taxable municipal securities are valued using recently executed observable trades or market price quotations and therefore are generally categorized as Level II. Certain illiquid taxable municipal securities are valued using market data for comparable securities (maturity and sector) and management judgment

15

Table of Contents
Piper Jaffray Companies
Notes to infer an appropriate current yield or other model-based valuation techniques deemed appropriate by management based on the specific nature of the individual security and are therefore categorized as Level III.Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)

Tax-exempt municipal securities – Tax-exempt municipal securities are valued using recently executed observable trades or market price quotations and therefore are generally categorized as Level II. Certain illiquid tax-exempt municipal securities are valued using market data for comparable securities (maturity and sector) and management judgment to infer an appropriate current yield or other model-based valuation techniques deemed appropriate by management based on the specific nature of the individual security and are therefore categorized as Level III.

Short-term municipal securities – Short-term municipal securities include auction rate securities, variable rate demand notes, and other short-term municipal securities. Variable rate demand notes and other short-term municipal securities are valued using recently executed observable trades or market price quotations and therefore are generally categorized as Level II. Auction rate securities with limited liquidity are categorized as Level III and are valued using discounted cash flow models with unobservable inputs such as the Company’sCompany's expected recovery rate on the securities.

Mortgage-backed securities – Mortgage-backed securities are valued using observable trades, when available. Certain mortgage-backed securities are valued using models where inputs to the model are directly observable in the market, or can be derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data. TheseTo the extent we hold, these mortgage-backed securities are categorized as Level II. Other mortgage-backed securities, which are principally collateralized by residential mortgages, have experienced low volumes of executed transactions resulting in less observable transaction data. Certain mortgage-backed securities collateralized by residential mortgages are valued using cash flow models that utilize unobservable inputs including credit default rates, prepayment rates, loss severity and valuation yields. As judgment is used to determine the range of these inputs, these mortgage-backed securities are categorized as Level III.


17

Table of Contents
Piper Jaffray Companies
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)

U.S. government agency securities – U.S. government agency securities include agency debt bonds and mortgage bonds. Agency debt bonds are valued by using either direct price quotes or price quotes for comparable bond securities and are categorized as Level II. Mortgage bonds include bonds secured by mortgages, mortgage pass-through securities, agency collateralized mortgage-obligation ("CMO") securities and agency interest-only securities. Mortgage pass-through securities, CMO securities and interest-only securities are valued using recently executed observable trades or other observable inputs, such as prepayment speeds and therefore are generally categorized as Level II. Mortgage bonds are valued using observable market inputs, such as market yields ranging from 205-853 basis points ("bps") on spreads over U.S. treasury securities, or models based upon prepayment expectations ranging from 0%-18% conditional prepayment rate ("CPR").expectations. These securities are categorized as Level II.

U.S. government securities – U.S. government securities include highly liquid U.S. treasury securities which are generally valued using quoted market prices and therefore categorized as Level I. The Company does not transact in securities of countries other than the U.S. government.

Derivatives – Derivative contracts include interest rate swaps, interest rate locks, credit default swap index contracts, U.S. treasury bond futures and equity option contracts. These instruments derive their value from underlying assets, reference rates, indices or a combination of these factors. The Company's equity option derivative contracts are valued based on quoted prices from the exchange for identical assets or liabilities as of the period-end date. To the extent these contracts are actively traded and valuation adjustments are not applied, they are categorized as Level I. The Company’sCompany's credit default swap index contracts are valued using market price quotations and are classified as Level II. The majority of the Company’sCompany's interest rate derivative contracts, including both interest rate swaps and interest rate locks, are valued using market standard pricing models based on the net present value of estimated future cash flows. The valuation models used do not involve material subjectivity as the methodologies do not entail significant judgment and the pricing inputs are market observable, including contractual terms, yield curves and measures of volatility. These instruments are classified as Level II within the fair value hierarchy. Certain interest rate locks transact in less active markets and were valued using valuation models that included the previously mentioned observable inputs and certain unobservable inputs that required significant judgment, such as the premium over the MMD curve. These instruments are classified as Level III.


16

Table of Contents
Piper Jaffray Companies
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)

Investments

The Company’sCompany's investments valued at fair value include equity investments in private companies and partnerships, investments in registered mutual funds warrants of public and private companies and private company debt. Investments in registered mutual funds are valued based on quoted prices on active markets and classified as Level I. Company-owned warrants, which have a cashless exercise option, are valued based upon the Black-Scholes option-pricing model and certain unobservable inputs. The Company applies a liquidity discount to the value of its warrants in public and private companies. For warrants in private companies, valuation adjustments, based upon management’s judgment, are made to account for differences between the measured security and the stock volatility factors of comparable companies. Company-owned warrants are reported as Level III assets. Investments in private companies are valued based on an assessment of each underlying security, considering rounds of financing, third party transactions and market-based information, including comparable company transactions, trading multiples (e.g., multiples of revenue and earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization ("EBITDA")) and changes in market outlook, among other factors. These securities are generally categorized as Level III.

Fair Value Option – The fair value option permits the irrevocable fair value option election on an instrument-by-instrument basis at initial recognition of an asset or liability or upon an event that gives rise to a new basis of accounting for that instrument. The fair value option was elected for certain merchant banking and other investments at inception to reflect economic events in earnings on a timely basis. Merchant banking and other equity investments of $13.93.3 million and $19.7$14.1 million, included within investments on the consolidated statements of financial condition, are accounted for at fair value and are classified as Level III assets at September 30, 20172018 and December 31, 2016,2017, respectively. The realized and unrealized net gains from fair value changes included in earnings as a result of electing to apply the fair value option to certain financial assets were $1.40.9 million and $1.01.4 million for the nine months ended September 30, 20172018 and 20162017, respectively.


18

Table of Contents
Piper Jaffray Companies
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)

The following table summarizes quantitative information about the significant unobservable inputs used in the fair value measurement of the Company’sCompany's Level III financial instruments as of September 30, 20172018:
 Valuation     Weighted
 Technique Unobservable Input Range       Average (1)
Assets:       
Financial instruments and other inventory positions owned:       
Municipal securities:
Tax-exempt securitiesDiscounted cash flowExpected recovery rate (% of par) (2)5 - 60%19.4%
Short-term securitiesDiscounted cash flowExpected recovery rate (% of par) (2)66 - 94%91.0%
Mortgage-backed securities:
Collateralized by residential mortgagesDiscounted cash flowCredit default rates (3)1 - 10%2.7%
Prepayment rates (4)2 - 18%10.0%
Loss severity (3)5 - 50%32.6%
Valuation yields (3)5 - 6%5.3%
Derivative contracts:       
Interest rate locksDiscounted cash flow Premium over the MMD curve (1)in basis points ("bps") (2) 41 - 2011 bps 11.38.7 bps
Investments at fair value:       
Equity securities in private companiesMarket approach Revenue multiple (2)(3) 2 - 6 times 4.8 times
   EBITDA multiple (2)(3) 1013 - 1516 times 12.214.4 times
        
Liabilities:       
Financial instruments and other inventory positions sold, but not yet purchased:       
Derivative contracts:       
Interest rate locksDiscounted cash flow Premium over the MMD curve (1)in bps (2) 17 - 2116 bps 10.98.9 bps
SensitivityUncertainty of the fair value to changes in unobservable inputs:measurements:
(1)
Significant increase/(decrease) inUnobservable inputs were weighted by the unobservable input in isolation would result in a significantly lower/(higher)relative fair value measurement.of the financial instruments.
(2)
(2) Significant increase/(decrease) in the unobservable input in isolation would have resulted in a significantly lower/(higher) fair value measurement.
(3) Significant increase/(decrease) in the unobservable input in isolation would have resulted in a significantly higher/(lower) fair value measurement.

Significant increase/(decrease) in the unobservable input in isolation would result in a significantly higher/(lower) fair value measurement.
(3)
Significant changes in any of these inputs in isolation could result in a significantly different fair value. Generally, a change in the assumption used for credit default rates is accompanied by a directionally similar change in the assumption used for the loss severity and a directionally inverse change in the assumption for valuation yields.
(4)
The potential impact of changes in prepayment rates on fair value is dependent on other security-specific factors, such as the par value and structure. Changes in the prepayment rates may result in directionally similar or directionally inverse changes in fair value depending on whether the security trades at a premium or discount to the par value.

1917

Table of Contents
Piper Jaffray Companies
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)

The following table summarizes the valuation of the Company’sCompany's financial instruments by pricing observability levels defined in FASB Accounting Standards Codification Topic 820, "Fair Value Measurement" ("ASC 820") as of September 30, 2017:2018:
      Counterparty        Counterparty  
      and Cash        and Cash  
      Collateral        Collateral  
(Dollars in thousands)Level I Level II Level III Netting (1) TotalLevel I Level II Level III Netting (1) Total
Assets:                  
Financial instruments and other inventory positions owned:                  
Corporate securities:                  
Equity securities$2,466
 $64,438
 $
 $
 $66,904
$266
 $21,207
 $
 $
 $21,473
Convertible securities
 70,900
 
 
 70,900

 126,641
 
 
 126,641
Fixed income securities
 27,480
 
 
 27,480

 42,976
 
 
 42,976
Municipal securities:                  
Taxable securities
 37,073
 
 
 37,073

 41,766
 
 
 41,766
Tax-exempt securities
 373,598
 750
 
 374,348

 226,702
 
 
 226,702
Short-term securities
 177,168
 705
 
 177,873

 150,045
 45
 
 150,090
Mortgage-backed securities
 
 4,321
 
 4,321

 
 16
 
 16
U.S. government agency securities
 300,832
 
 
 300,832

 173,477
 
 
 173,477
U.S. government securities17,205
 
 
 
 17,205
1,561
 
 
 
 1,561
Derivative contracts
 270,149
 686
 (248,443) 22,392

 159,685
 1,273
 (147,540) 13,418
Total financial instruments and other inventory positions owned19,671
 1,321,638
 6,462
 (248,443) 1,099,328
1,827
 942,499
 1,334
 (147,540) 798,120
                  
Cash equivalents4,112
 
 
 
 4,112
40,793
 
 
 
 40,793
                  
Investments at fair value37,778
 
 130,160
(2)
 167,938
39,501
 
 104,285
(2)
 143,786
Total assets$61,561
 $1,321,638
 $136,622
 $(248,443) $1,271,378
$82,121
 $942,499
 $105,619
 $(147,540) $982,699
                  
Liabilities:                  
Financial instruments and other inventory positions sold, but not yet purchased:                  
Corporate securities:                  
Equity securities$100,181
 $222
 $
 $
 $100,403
$112,642
 $4,070
 $
 $
 $116,712
Fixed income securities
 21,149
 
 
 21,149

 31,187
 
 
 31,187
U.S. government agency securities
 26,703
 
 
 26,703

 37,245
 
 
 37,245
U.S. government securities164,084
 39,911
 
 
 203,995
65,205
 
 
 
 65,205
Derivative contracts
 255,308
 4,250
 (254,073) 5,485

 147,944
 368
 (144,076) 4,236
Total financial instruments and other inventory positions sold, but not yet purchased$264,265
 $343,293
 $4,250
 $(254,073) $357,735
$177,847
 $220,446
 $368
 $(144,076) $254,585
(1)
Represents cash collateral and the impact of netting on a counterparty basis. The Company had no securities posted as collateral to its counterparties.
(2)Noncontrolling interests of $44.9$47.2 million are attributable to third party ownership in consolidated merchant banking and senior living funds.


2018

Table of Contents
Piper Jaffray Companies
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)

The following table summarizes the valuation of the Company’sCompany's financial instruments by pricing observability levels defined in ASC 820 as of December 31, 20162017:
      Counterparty        Counterparty  
      and Cash        and Cash  
      Collateral        Collateral  
(Dollars in thousands)Level I Level II Level III Netting (1) TotalLevel I Level II Level III Netting (1) Total
Assets:                  
Financial instruments and other inventory positions owned:                  
Corporate securities:                  
Equity securities$82
 $6,281
 $
 $
 $6,363
$1,863
 $50,033
 $
 $
 $51,896
Convertible securities
 103,486
 
 
 103,486

 74,456
 
 
 74,456
Fixed income securities
 21,018
 
 
 21,018

 30,145
 
 
 30,145
Municipal securities:                  
Taxable securities
 60,404
 2,686
 
 63,090

 67,699
 
 
 67,699
Tax-exempt securities
 558,252
 1,077
 
 559,329

 743,541
 700
 
 744,241
Short-term securities
 34,431
 744
 
 35,175

 61,537
 714
 
 62,251
Mortgage-backed securities
 273
 5,365
 
 5,638

 
 481
 
 481
U.S. government agency securities
 205,685
 
 
 205,685

 317,318
 
 
 317,318
U.S. government securities29,970
 
 
 
 29,970
9,317
 
 
 
 9,317
Derivative contracts
 288,955
 13,952
 (273,690) 29,217
6
 239,224
 126
 (213,783) 25,573
Total financial instruments and other inventory positions owned30,052
 1,278,785
 23,824
 (273,690) 1,058,971
11,186
 1,583,953
 2,021
 (213,783) 1,383,377
                  
Cash equivalents768
 
 
 
 768
3,782
 
 
 
 3,782
                  
Investments at fair value32,783
 
 123,319
(2)
 156,102
39,504
 
 126,060
(2)
 165,564
Total assets$63,603
 $1,278,785
 $147,143
 $(273,690) $1,215,841
$54,472
 $1,583,953
 $128,081
 $(213,783) $1,552,723
                  
Liabilities:                  
Financial instruments and other inventory positions sold, but not yet purchased:                  
Corporate securities:                  
Equity securities$89,453
 $
 $
 $
 $89,453
$91,934
 $9,583
 $
 $
 $101,517
Fixed income securities
 17,324
 
 
 17,324

 30,292
 
 
 30,292
U.S. government agency securities
 6,723
 
 
 6,723

 49,077
 
 
 49,077
U.S. government securities180,650
 
 
 
 180,650
213,312
 
 
 
 213,312
Derivative contracts
 273,166
 1,487
 (269,446) 5,207

 225,916
 4,433
 (225,320) 5,029
Total financial instruments and other inventory positions sold, but not yet purchased$270,103
 $297,213
 $1,487
 $(269,446) $299,357
$305,246
 $314,868
 $4,433
 $(225,320) $399,227
(1)
Represents cash collateral and the impact of netting on a counterparty basis. The Company had no securities posted as collateral to its counterparties.
(2)Noncontrolling interests of $45.1$44.4 million are attributable to third party ownership in consolidated merchant banking and senior living funds.

The Company’sCompany's Level III assets were $136.6105.6 million and $147.1128.1 million, or 10.7 percent and 12.18.2 percent of financial instruments measured at fair value at September 30, 20172018 and December 31, 20162017, respectively. The value of transfers between levels are recognized at the beginning of the reporting period. There were no significant transfers between Level I, Level II or Level IIIlevels for the nine months ended September 30, 2017.2018.
 

2119

Table of Contents
Piper Jaffray Companies
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)

The following tables summarize the changes in fair value associated with Level III financial instruments held at the beginning or end of the periods presented:
                Unrealized gains/                Unrealized gains/
                (losses) for assets/                (losses) for assets/
Balance at         Realized Unrealized Balance at liabilities held atBalance at         Realized Unrealized Balance at liabilities held at
June 30,     Transfers Transfers gains/ gains/ September 30, September 30,June 30,     Transfers Transfers gains/ gains/ September 30, September 30,
(Dollars in thousands)2017 Purchases Sales in out (losses) (1) (losses) (1) 2017 2017 (1)2018 Purchases Sales in out (losses) (1) (losses) (1) 2018 2018 (1)
Assets:                                  
Financial instruments and other inventory positions owned:                                  
Municipal securities:                                  
Tax-exempt securities$1,117
 $
 $(267) $
 $
 $
 $(100) $750
 $(100)
Short-term securities721
 
 
 
 
 
 (16) 705
 (16)$45
 $
 $
 $
 $
 $
 $
 $45
 $
Mortgage-backed securities4,251
 
 
 
 
 
 70
 4,321
 70
18
 
 
 
 
 
 (2) 16
 (2)
Derivative contracts383
 105
 
 
 
 (105) 303
 686
 686
930
 
 (90) 
 
 90
 343
 1,273
 441
Total financial instruments and other inventory positions owned6,472
 105
 (267) 
 
 (105) 257
 6,462
 640
993
 
 (90) 
 
 90
 341
 1,334
 439
                                  
Investments at fair value113,885
 18,250
 
 
 
 
 (1,975) 130,160
 (1,975)108,121
 10,000
 (14,199) 
 (357) 4,949
 (4,229) 104,285
 (4,229)
Total assets$120,357
 $18,355
 $(267) $
 $
 $(105) $(1,718) $136,622
 $(1,335)$109,114
 $10,000
 $(14,289) $
 $(357) $5,039
 $(3,888) $105,619
 $(3,790)
                                  
Liabilities:                                  
Financial instruments and other inventory positions sold, but not yet purchased:                                  
Derivative contracts$5,573
 $
 $3,461
 $
 $
 $(3,461) $(1,323) $4,250
 $1,430
$1,005
 $(210) $40
 $
 $
 $169
 $(636) $368
 $(464)
Total financial instruments and other inventory positions sold, but not yet purchased$5,573
 $
 $3,461
 $
 $
 $(3,461) $(1,323) $4,250
 $1,430
$1,005
 $(210) $40
 $
 $
 $169
 $(636) $368
 $(464)
(1)Realized and unrealized gains/(losses) related to financial instruments, with the exception of customer matched-book derivatives, are reported in institutional brokerage on the consolidated statements of operations. Realized and unrealized gains/(losses) related to customer matched-book derivatives are reported in investment banking. Realized and unrealized gains/(losses) related to investments are reported in investment banking revenues or investment income/(loss) on the consolidated statements of operations.

2220

Table of Contents
Piper Jaffray Companies
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)

                Unrealized gains/                Unrealized gains/
                (losses) for assets/                (losses) for assets/
Balance at         Realized Unrealized Balance at liabilities held atBalance at         Realized Unrealized Balance at liabilities held at
June 30,     Transfers Transfers gains/ gains/ September 30, September 30,June 30,     Transfers Transfers gains/ gains/ September 30, September 30,
(Dollars in thousands)2016 Purchases Sales in out (losses) (1) (losses) (1) 2016 2016 (1)2017 Purchases Sales in out (losses) (1) (losses) (1) 2017 2017 (1)
Assets:                                  
Financial instruments and other inventory positions owned:                                  
Municipal securities:                                  
Tax-exempt securities$1,177
 $
 $
 $
 $
 $
 $
 $1,177
 $
$1,117
 $
 $(267) $
 $
 $
 $(100) $750
 $(100)
Short-term securities748
 
 
 
 
 
 
 748
 
721
 
 
 
 
 
 (16) 705
 (16)
Mortgage-backed securities56,053
 
 (44,006) 
 
 1,440
 190
 13,677
 111
4,251
 
 
 
 
 
 70
 4,321
 70
Derivative contracts18
 
 
 
 
 
 942
 960
 960
383
 105
 
 
 
 (105) 303
 686
 686
Total financial instruments and other inventory positions owned57,996
 
 (44,006) 
 
 1,440
 1,132
 16,562
 1,071
6,472
 105
 (267) 
 
 (105) 257
 6,462
 640
                                  
Investments at fair value122,786
 12,011
 (21,309) 
 
 10,336
 (7,709) 116,115
 2,570
113,885
 18,250
 
 
 
 
 (1,975) 130,160
 (1,975)
Total assets$180,782
 $12,011
 $(65,315) $
 $
 $11,776
 $(6,577) $132,677
 $3,641
$120,357
 $18,355
 $(267) $
 $
 $(105) $(1,718) $136,622
 $(1,335)
                                  
Liabilities:                                  
Financial instruments and other inventory positions sold, but not yet purchased:                                  
Derivative contracts$14,785
 $(5,922) $171
 $
 $
 $5,751
 $(7,497) $7,288
 $(1,263)$5,573
 $
 $3,461
 $
 $
 $(3,461) $(1,323) $4,250
 $1,430
Total financial instruments and other inventory positions sold, but not yet purchased$14,785
 $(5,922) $171
 $
 $
 $5,751
 $(7,497) $7,288
 $(1,263)$5,573
 $
 $3,461
 $
 $
 $(3,461) $(1,323) $4,250
 $1,430
(1)Realized and unrealized gains/(losses) related to financial instruments, with the exception of customer matched-book derivatives, are reported in institutional brokerage on the consolidated statements of operations. Realized and unrealized gains/(losses) related to customer matched-book derivatives are reported in investment banking. Realized and unrealized gains/(losses) related to investments are reported in investment banking revenues or investment income/(loss) on the consolidated statements of operations.


21

Table of Contents
Piper Jaffray Companies
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)

                 Unrealized gains/
                 (losses) for assets/
 Balance at         Realized Unrealized Balance at liabilities held at
 December 31,     Transfers Transfers gains/ gains/ September 30, September 30,
(Dollars in thousands)2017 Purchases Sales in out (losses) (1) (losses) (1) 2018 2018 (1)
Assets:                 
Financial instruments and other inventory positions owned:                 
Municipal securities:                 
Tax-exempt securities$700
 $
 $
 $
 $(700) $
 $
 $
 $
Short-term securities714
 
 (725) 
 
 51
 5
 45
 
Mortgage-backed securities481
 
 (5) 
 
 
 (460) 16
 (93)
Derivative contracts126
 4
 (2,965) 
 
 2,961
 1,147
 1,273
 1,273
Total financial instruments and other inventory positions owned2,021
 4
 (3,695) 
 (700) 3,012
 692
 1,334
 1,180
                  
Investments at fair value126,060
 11,708
 (29,139) 
 (502) 14,015
 (17,857) 104,285
 (8,307)
Total assets$128,081
 $11,712
 $(32,834) $
 $(1,202) $17,027
 $(17,165) $105,619
 $(7,127)
                  
Liabilities:                 
Financial instruments and other inventory positions sold, but not yet purchased:                 
Derivative contracts$4,433
 $(1,600) $3,266
 $
 $
 $(1,666) $(4,065) $368
 $368
Total financial instruments and other inventory positions sold, but not yet purchased$4,433
 $(1,600) $3,266
 $
 $
 $(1,666) $(4,065) $368
 $368
(1)Realized and unrealized gains/(losses) related to financial instruments, with the exception of customer matched-book derivatives, are reported in institutional brokerage on the consolidated statements of operations. Realized and unrealized gains/(losses) related to customer matched-book derivatives are reported in investment banking. Realized and unrealized gains/(losses) related to investments are reported in investment banking revenues or investment income/(loss) on the consolidated statements of operations.




23
22

Table of Contents
Piper Jaffray Companies
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)

                 Unrealized gains/
                 (losses) for assets/
 Balance at         Realized Unrealized Balance at liabilities held at
 December 31,     Transfers Transfers gains/ gains/ September 30, September 30,
(Dollars in thousands)2016 Purchases Sales in out (losses) (1) (losses) (1) 2017 2017 (1)
Assets:                 
Financial instruments and other inventory positions owned:                 
Municipal securities:                 
Taxable securities$2,686
 $
 $(2,703) $
 $
 $716
 $(699) $
 $
Tax-exempt securities1,077
 
 (267) 
 
 
 (60) 750
 (60)
Short-term securities744
 
 (25) 
 
 2
 (16) 705
 (16)
Mortgage-backed securities5,365
 997
 (1,854) 
 
 296
 (483) 4,321
 (90)
Derivative contracts13,952
 350
 (11,978) 
 
 11,628
 (13,266) 686
 686
Total financial instruments and other inventory positions owned23,824
 1,347
 (16,827) 
 
 12,642
 (14,524) 6,462
 520
                  
Investments at fair value123,319
 25,444
 (25,211) 
 (601) 9,399
 (2,190) 130,160
 7,704
Total assets$147,143
 $26,791
 $(42,038) $
 $(601) $22,041
 $(16,714) $136,622
 $8,224
                  
Liabilities:                 
Financial instruments and other inventory positions sold, but not yet purchased:                 
Derivative contracts$1,487
 $(719) $11,219
 $
 $
 $(10,500) $2,763
 $4,250
 $4,125
Total financial instruments and other inventory positions sold, but not yet purchased$1,487
 $(719) $11,219
 $
 $
 $(10,500) $2,763
 $4,250
 $4,125
(1)Realized and unrealized gains/(losses) related to financial instruments, with the exception of customer matched-book derivatives, are reported in institutional brokerage on the consolidated statements of operations. Realized and unrealized gains/(losses) related to customer matched-book derivatives are reported in investment banking. Realized and unrealized gains/(losses) related to investments are reported in investment banking revenues or investment income/(loss) on the consolidated statements of operations.

24

Table of Contents
Piper Jaffray Companies
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)

                 Unrealized gains/
                 (losses) for assets/
 Balance at         Realized Unrealized Balance at liabilities held at
 December 31,     Transfers Transfers gains/ gains/ September 30, September 30,
(Dollars in thousands)2015 Purchases Sales in out (losses) (1) (losses) (1) 2016 2016 (1)
Assets:                 
Financial instruments and other inventory positions owned:                 
Municipal securities:                 
Taxable securities$5,816
 $
 $(611) $
 $(5,216) $11
 $
 $
 $
Tax-exempt securities1,177
 
 
 
 
 
 
 1,177
 
Short-term securities720
 
 
 
 
 
 28
 748
 28
Mortgage-backed securities121,124
 26,519
 (133,913) 
 
 3,285
 (3,338) 13,677
 241
Derivative contracts
 246
 
 
 
 (246) 960
 960
 960
Total financial instruments and other inventory positions owned128,837
 26,765
 (134,524) 
 (5,216) 3,050
 (2,350) 16,562
 1,229
                  
Investments at fair value109,444
 27,683
 (21,309) 
 (9,088) 10,336
 (951) 116,115
 (1,223)
Total assets$238,281
 $54,448
 $(155,833) $
 $(14,304) $13,386
 $(3,301) $132,677
 $6
                  
Liabilities:                 
Financial instruments and other inventory positions sold, but not yet purchased:                 
Derivative contracts$7,148
 $(23,700) $171
 $
 $
 $23,529
 $140
 $7,288
 $7,288
Total financial instruments and other inventory positions sold, but not yet purchased$7,148
 $(23,700) $171
 $
 $
 $23,529
 $140
 $7,288
 $7,288
(1)Realized and unrealized gains/(losses) related to financial instruments, with the exception of customer matched-book derivatives, are reported in institutional brokerage on the consolidated statements of operations. Realized and unrealized gains/(losses) related to customer matched-book derivatives are reported in investment banking. Realized and unrealized gains/(losses) related to investments are reported in investment banking revenues or investment income/(loss) on the consolidated statements of operations.

The carrying values of the Company’sCompany's cash, securities either purchased or sold under agreements to resell, receivables and payables either from or to customers and brokers, dealers and clearing organizations and short-term financings approximate fair value due to their liquid or short-term nature.

Non-Recurring Fair Value Measurement

During the third quarter of 2017, the Company recorded a non-cash goodwill impairment charge of $114.4 million representing the full value of goodwill attributable to the asset management reporting unit. The fair value measurement used in the analysis was calculated using the income approach (discounted cash flow method) and market approach (earnings multiples of public company comparables). The discounted cash flow model was calculated using unobservable inputs, such as revenue and EBITDA forecasts, which are classified as Level III within the fair value hierarchy. See Note 11 for further discussion.


25

Table of Contents
Piper Jaffray Companies
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)

Note 65 Variable Interest Entities("VIEs")

The Company has investments in and/or acts as the managing partner of various partnerships, limited liability companies, and registered mutual funds. These entities were established for the purpose of investing in securities of public or private companies, or municipal debt obligations, or providing financing to senior living facilities, and were initially financed through the capital commitments or seed investments of the members.

VIEs are entities in which equity investors lack the characteristics of a controlling financial interest or do not have sufficient equity at risk for the entity to finance its activities. The determination as to whether an entity is a VIE is based on the structure and nature of each entity. The Company also considers other characteristics such as the power through voting rights or similar rights to direct the activities of an entity that most significantly impact the entity’sentity's economic performance and how the entity is financed.


23

Table of Contents
Piper Jaffray Companies
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)

The Company is required to consolidate all VIEs for which it is considered to be the primary beneficiary. The determination as to whether the Company is considered to be the primary beneficiary is based on whether the Company has both the power to direct the activities of the VIE that most significantly impact the entity’sentity's economic performance and the obligation to absorb losses or the right to receive benefits of the VIE that could potentially be significant to the VIE.

Consolidated VIEs

The Company’sCompany's consolidated VIEs at September 30, 2017 include2018 included certain alternative asset management funds in which the Company has an investment and, as the managing partner, is deemed to have both the power to direct the most significant activities of the funds and the right to receive benefits (or the obligation to absorb losses) that could potentially be significant to these funds.

The following table presents information about the carrying value of the assets and liabilities of the VIEs which are consolidated by the Company and included on the consolidated statements of financial condition at September 30, 2017.2018. The assets can only be used to settle the liabilities of the respective VIE, and the creditors of the VIEs do not have recourse to the general credit of the Company. One of these VIEs has $25.0 million of bank line financing available with an interest rate based on prime plus an applicable margin. The assets and liabilities are presented prior to consolidation, and thus a portion of these assets and liabilities are eliminated in consolidation.

 Alternative Asset Alternative Asset
(Dollars in thousands) Management Funds Management Funds
Assets:    
Receivables from brokers, dealers and clearing organizations $15,765
Financial instruments and other inventory positions owned and pledged as collateral 149,632
Investments 112,834
 $100,905
Other assets 4,621
 6,761
Total assets $282,852
 $107,666
    
Liabilities:    
Short-term financing $76,797
Payables to brokers, dealers and clearing organizations 46,627
Financial instruments and other inventory positions sold, but not yet purchased 21,813
Other liabilities and accrued expenses 18,344
 $10,740
Total liabilities $163,581
 $10,740

The Company has investments in a grantor trust which was established as part of a nonqualified deferred compensation plan. The Company is the primary beneficiary of the grantor trust. Accordingly, the assets and liabilities of the grantor trust are consolidated by the Company on the consolidated statements of financial condition. See Note 1613 for additional information on the nonqualified deferred compensation plan.

26

Table of Contents
Piper Jaffray Companies
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)

Nonconsolidated VIEs

The Company determined it is not the primary beneficiary of certain VIEs and accordingly does not consolidate them. These VIEs had net assets approximating $0.6$0.5 billion and $0.8$0.6 billion at September 30, 20172018 and December 31, 2016,2017, respectively. The Company’sCompany's exposure to loss from these VIEs is $6.4$6.9 million, which is the carrying value of its capital contributions recorded in investments on the consolidated statements of financial condition at September 30, 2017.2018. The Company had no liabilities related to these VIEs at September 30, 20172018 and December 31, 2016,2017, respectively. Furthermore, the Company has not provided financial or other support to these VIEs that it was not previously contractually required to provide as of September 30, 2017.2018.


24

Table of Contents
Piper Jaffray Companies
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)

Note 76 Receivables from and Payables to Brokers, Dealers and Clearing Organizations

September 30, December 31,September 30, December 31,
(Dollars in thousands)2017 20162018 2017
Receivable arising from unsettled securities transactions$15,765
 $132,724
Deposits paid for securities borrowed
 27,573
Receivable from clearing organizations36,891
 3,293
$153,527
 $109,270
Deposits with clearing organizations12,409
 35,713
2,551
 11,019
Securities failed to deliver
 975
Receivable from brokers and dealers15,058
 12,041
Receivable arising from unsettled securities transactions
 9,218
Other15,815
 12,452
2,929
 3,846
Total receivables from brokers, dealers and clearing organizations$80,880
 $212,730
$174,065
 $145,394

September 30, December 31,September 30, December 31,
(Dollars in thousands)2017 20162018 2017
Payable to brokers and dealers$6,371
 $18,584
Payable arising from unsettled securities transactions$49,160
 $13,948

 808
Payable to clearing organizations
 15,893
Securities failed to receive
 3,043
Other5,105
 7,958
Total payables to brokers, dealers and clearing organizations$54,265
 $40,842
$6,371
 $19,392

The Company has established an arrangementAs discussed in Note 1, Piper Jaffray transitioned from a self clearing securities broker dealer to obtain financing from Pershing related to the majority of its trading activities.a fully disclosed clearing model in 2017. Under the Company's fully disclosed clearing agreement, the majority of its securities inventories and all of its customer activities are held by or cleared through Pershing. The Company has also established an arrangement to obtain financing from Pershing related to the majority of its trading activities. Financing under this arrangement is secured primarily by securities, and collateral limitations could reduce the amount of funding available under this arrangement. The funding is at the discretion of Pershing and could be denied. The Company's clearing arrangement activities are recorded net from trading activity. The Company's fully disclosed clearing agreement includes a covenant requiring Piper Jaffray to maintain excess net capital of $120 million.

Deposits paid for securities borrowed approximate the market value of the securities. Securities failed to deliver and receive represent the contract value of securities that have not been delivered or received by the Company on settlement date.

Note 8Collateralized Securities Transactions

As discussed in Note 1, Piper Jaffray transitioned from a self clearing securities broker dealer to a fully disclosed clearing model in the third quarter of 2017.

The Company’s current financing and prior customer securities activities involve the Company using securities as collateral. In the event that the counterparty does not meet its contractual obligation to return securities used as collateral (e.g., pursuant to the terms of a repurchase agreement), or customers did not deposit additional securities or cash for margin when required, the Company may be exposed to the risk of reacquiring the securities or selling the securities at unfavorable market prices in order to satisfy its obligations. The Company seeks to control this risk by monitoring the market value of securities pledged or used as collateral on a daily basis and requiring adjustments in the event of excess market exposure. The Company also uses unaffiliated third party custodians to administer the underlying collateral for certain of its short-term financings to mitigate risk.


27

Table of Contents
Piper Jaffray Companies
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)

In a reverse repurchase agreement the Company purchases financial instruments from a seller, typically in exchange for cash, and agrees to resell the same or substantially the same financial instruments to the seller at a stated price plus accrued interest in the future. In a repurchase agreement, the Company sells financial instruments to a buyer, typically for cash, and agrees to repurchase the same or substantially the same financial instruments from the buyer at a stated price plus accrued interest at a future date. Even though repurchase and reverse repurchase agreements involve the legal transfer of ownership of financial instruments, they are accounted for as financing arrangements because they require the financial instruments to be repurchased or resold at maturity of the agreement.

In a securities borrowed transaction, the Company borrows securities from a counterparty in exchange for cash. When the Company returns the securities, the counterparty returns the cash. Interest is generally paid periodically over the life of the transaction.

Prior to transitioning to a fully disclosed clearing model, the Company obtained securities purchased under agreements to resell, securities borrowed and margin agreements on terms that permit it to repledge or resell the securities to others, typically pursuant to repurchase agreements. The Company obtained securities with a fair value of approximately $192.2 million at December 31, 2016, of which $185.2 million had been pledged or otherwise transferred to satisfy its commitments under financial instruments and other inventory positions sold, but not yet purchased.

Reverse repurchase agreements, repurchase agreements and securities borrowed and loaned are reported on a net basis by counterparty when a legal right of offset exists. The Company had no outstanding securities lending arrangements as of September 30, 2017 or December 31, 2016. See Note 4 for information related to the Company's offsetting of derivative contracts. 

Note 97 Investments

The Company’sCompany's investments include investments in private companies and partnerships, registered mutual funds warrants of public and private companies and private company debt.
September 30, December 31,September 30, December 31,
(Dollars in thousands)2017 20162018 2017
Investments at fair value$167,938
 $156,102
$143,786
 $165,564
Investments at cost3,068
 2,755
1,614
 2,416
Investments accounted for under the equity method8,521
 9,200
6,980
 8,232
Total investments179,527
 168,057
152,380
 176,212
      
Less investments attributable to noncontrolling interests (1)(44,932) (45,123)(47,204) (44,397)
$134,595
 $122,934
$105,176
 $131,815
(1)Noncontrolling interests are attributable to third party ownership in consolidated merchant banking and senior living funds.

At September 30, 20172018, investments carried on a cost basis had an estimated fair market value of $4.6$1.6 million. Because valuation estimates were based upon management’smanagement's judgment, investments carried at cost would be categorized as Level III assets in the fair value hierarchy, if they were carried at fair value.

Investments accounted for under the equity method include general and limited partnership interests. The carrying value of these investments is based on the investment vehicle’svehicle's net asset value. The net assets of investment partnerships consist of investments in both marketable and non-marketable securities. The underlying investments held by such partnerships are valued based on the estimated fair value determined by management in the Company's capacity as general partner or investor and, in the case of investments in unaffiliated investment partnerships, are based on financial statements prepared by the unaffiliated general partners.


2825

Table of Contents
Piper Jaffray Companies
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)

Note 108 Other Assets

September 30, December 31,September 30, December 31,
(Dollars in thousands)2017 20162018 2017
Fee receivables$21,968
 $22,840
$26,170
 $20,884
Income tax receivables7,311
 
Accrued interest receivables7,612
 9,259
8,485
 6,981
Forgivable loans, net8,422
 9,307
8,377
 7,452
Prepaid expenses5,122
 6,363
8,016
 6,769
Secured loan receivables2,975
 6,236
Other9,344
 13,124
10,340
 12,748
Total other assets$55,443
 $67,129
$68,699
 $54,834

Note 11Goodwill and Intangible Assets

 Capital Asset  
(Dollars in thousands)Markets Management  Total
Goodwill     
Balance at December 31, 2016$81,855
 $114,363
 $196,218
Impairment charge
 (114,363) (114,363)
Balance at September 30, 2017$81,855
 $
 $81,855
      
Intangible assets     
Balance at December 31, 2016$19,320
 $17,914
 $37,234
Amortization of intangible assets(7,633) (3,833) (11,466)
Balance at September 30, 2017$11,687
 $14,081
 $25,768

The Company tests goodwill and indefinite-life intangible assets for impairment on an annual basis and on an interim basis when circumstances exist that could indicate possible impairment. The Company tests for impairment at the reporting unit level, which is generally one level below its operating segments. The Company has identified two reporting units: capital markets and asset management. When testing for impairment, the Company has the option to first assess qualitative factors to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount. If, after making an assessment, the Company determines it is not more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount, then further analysis is unnecessary. However, if the Company concludes otherwise, then the Company is required to perform a two-step impairment test, which requires management to make judgments in determining what assumptions to use in the calculation. The first step requires a comparison of the fair value of the reporting unit to its carrying value, including allocated goodwill. The estimated fair value of the reporting unit is derived based on valuation techniques that a market participant would use. The Company estimates the fair value of the reporting unit using the income approach (discounted cash flow method) and market approach (earnings and/or transaction multiples). As discussed in Note 2, the Company adopted ASU 2017-04 effective July 1, 2017. ASU 2017-04 eliminates the second step from the goodwill impairment test. Accordingly, the Company will record an impairment charge based on the excess of a reporting unit’s carrying amount over its fair value.

The Company identified impairment indicators in the third quarter of 2017 related to the asset management reporting unit and performed an interim goodwill impairment test as of July 31, 2017, which resulted in a non-cash goodwill impairment charge of $114.4 million. The fair value of the asset management reporting unit was calculated using the income approach (discounted cash flow method based on revenue and EBITDA forecasts) and market approach (earnings multiples of comparable public companies). The impairment charge resulted from declining profitability in 2017 as decreases in revenues relating to higher fee product offerings have not been fully offset by new revenues on assets gained in lower fee product offerings. The shift in revenue mix is attributable, in part, to the extended cycle of investors favoring passive investment vehicles over active management.

The Company also evaluated its intangible assets (indefinite and definite-lived) related to the asset management reporting unit and concluded there was no impairment.


29

Table of Contents
Piper Jaffray Companies
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)

Note 129 Short-Term Financing

Outstanding Balance             Weighted Average Interest RateOutstanding Balance             Weighted Average Interest Rate
September 30, December 31, September 30, December 31,September 30, December 31, September 30, December 31,
(Dollars in thousands)2017 2016 2017 20162018 2017 2018 2017
Commercial paper (secured)$
 $147,021
 N/A
 2.12%$49,957
 $49,974
 3.12% 2.32%
Prime broker arrangements76,797
 271,811
 1.98% 1.49%
Prime broker arrangement
 239,963
 N/A
 2.23%
Total short-term financing$76,797
 $418,832
    $49,957
 $289,937
    

The Company issues secured commercial paper to fund a portion of its securities inventory. The commercial paper notes ("CP Notes") can be issued with maturities of 27 days to 270 days from the date of issuance. The CP Notes are currently issued under two separate programs, CP Series A and CP Series II A, and are secured by different inventory classes. As of September 30, 2018, the weighted average maturity of outstanding CP Series III ANotes was discontinued during the third quarter of 2017.10 days. The CP Notes are interest bearing or sold at a discount to par with an interest rate based on LIBOR plus an applicable margin. CP Series II A includes a revised covenant that requires the Company’sCompany's U.S. broker dealer subsidiary to maintain excess net capital of $100 million. At September 30, 2017, the Company had no CP Notes outstanding.

The Company hashad established arrangementsan arrangement to obtain financing with a prime brokersbroker related to its municipal bond fund and convertible securities.fund. Financing under these arrangements isthis arrangement was primarily secured by municipal securities and collateral limitations could reduce the amount of funding available under the arrangements.available. Prime broker financing activities arewere recorded net of receivables from trading activity. The funding iswas at the discretion of the prime brokersbroker subject to a notice period. In the third quarter of 2018, the Company completed the liquidation of its municipal bond fund, and closed this prime broker arrangement.

The Company has both committed and uncommitted short-term bank line financing available on a secured basis. The Company uses these credit facilities in the ordinary course of business to fund a portion of its daily operations and the amount borrowed under these credit facilities varies daily based on the Company’sCompany's funding needs.

The Company’sCompany's committed short-term bank line financing at September 30, 20172018 consisted of a one-year $200 million committed revolving credit facility with U.S. Bank, N.A., which was renewed in December 2016.2017. Advances under this facility are secured by certain marketable securities. The facility includes a covenant that requires the Company’sCompany's U.S. broker dealer subsidiary to maintain minimum net capital of $120 million, and the unpaid principal amount of all advances under this facility will be due on December 16, 2017.14, 2018. The Company pays a nonrefundable commitment fee on the unused portion of the facility on a quarterly basis. At September 30, 20172018, the Company had no advances against this line of credit.

The Company’sCompany's uncommitted secured line at September 30, 20172018 totaled $85 million and is dependent on having appropriate collateral, as determined by the bank agreement, to secure an advance under the line. The availability of the Company’sCompany's uncommitted line is subject to approval by the bank each time an advance is requested and may be denied. At September 30, 20172018, the Company had no advances against this line of credit.


30
26

Table of Contents
Piper Jaffray Companies
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)

Note 1310 Senior Notes

The Company has entered into variableContingencies, Commitments and fixed rate senior notes with certain entities advised by Pacific Investment Management Company ("PIMCO"). The following table presents the outstanding balance by note class:

 Outstanding Balance
 September 30, December 31,
(Dollars in thousands)2017 2016
Class A Notes$
 $50,000
Class C Notes125,000
 125,000
Total senior notes$125,000
 $175,000

On October 8, 2015, the Company entered into a second amended and restated note purchase agreement ("Second Amended and Restated Note Purchase Agreement") under which the Company issued $125 million of fixed rate Class C Notes. The Class C Notes bear interest at an annual fixed rate of 5.06 percent, are payable semi-annually and mature on October 9, 2018. The unpaid principal amount is due in full on the maturity date and may not be prepaid by the Company. The variable rate Class A Notes were repaid by the Company upon maturity on May 31, 2017.

The Second Amended and Restated Note Purchase Agreement includes customary events of default and covenants that, among other things, require the Company to maintain a minimum consolidated tangible net worth and regulatory net capital, limit the Company's leverage ratio and require the Company to maintain a minimum ratio of operating cash flow to fixed charges. At September 30, 2017, the Company was in compliance with all covenants.

The senior notes are recorded at amortized cost. As of September 30, 2017, the fair value of the fixed rate Class C Notes was approximately $125.7 million.

Note 14Legal ContingenciesGuarantees

The Company has been named as a defendant in various legal actions, including complaints and litigation and arbitration claims, arising from its business activities. Such actions include claims related to securities brokerage and investment banking activities, and certain class actions that primarily allege violations of securities laws and seek unspecified damages, which could be substantial. Also, the Company is involved from time to time in investigations and proceedings by governmental agencies and self-regulatory organizations ("SROs") which could result in adverse judgments, settlement, penalties, fines or other relief.

The Company has established reserves for potential losses that are probable and reasonably estimable that may result from pending and potential legal actions, investigations and regulatory proceedings. Reasonably possible losses in excess of amounts accrued at September 30, 20172018 are not material. In many cases, however, it is inherently difficult to determine whether any loss is probable or even possible or to estimate the amount or range of any potential loss, particularly where proceedings may be in relatively early stages or where plaintiffs are seeking substantial or indeterminate damages. Matters frequently need to be more developed before a loss or range of loss can reasonably be estimated.

Given uncertainties regarding the timing, scope, volume and outcome of pending and potential legal actions, investigations and regulatory proceedings and other factors, the amounts of reserves and ranges of reasonably possible losses are difficult to determine and of necessity subject to future revision. Subject to the foregoing, management of the Company believes, based on currently available information, after consultation with outside legal counsel and taking into account its established reserves, that pending legal actions, investigations and regulatory proceedings will be resolved with no material adverse effect on the consolidated statements of financial condition, results of operations or cash flows of the Company. However, if during any period a potential adverse contingency should become probable or resolved for an amount in excess of the established reserves, the results of operations and cash flows in that period and the financial condition as of the end of that period could be materially adversely affected. In addition, there can be no assurance that material losses will not be incurred from claims that have not yet been brought to the Company’sCompany's attention or are not yet determined to be reasonably possible.

Operating Lease Commitments

The Company leases office space throughout the United States and in a limited number of foreign countries where the Company's international operations reside. Aggregate minimum lease commitments under operating leases as of September 30, 2018 are as follows:
(Dollars in thousands) 
Remainder of 2018$3,557
201913,601
202013,686
20219,329
20227,985
Thereafter22,900
Total$71,058

Investment Commitments

As of September 30, 2018, the Company had commitments to invest approximately $80.6 million in limited partnerships or limited liability companies that make direct or indirect equity or debt investments in companies.


3127

Table of Contents
Piper Jaffray Companies
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)

Note 11Restructuring

The Company incurred the following pre-tax restructuring costs principally related to headcount reductions in both the Capital Markets and Asset Management segments.
  Three Months Ended Nine Months Ended
(Dollars in thousands) September 30, 2018 September 30, 2018
Severance, benefits and outplacement costs $
 $3,455
Contract termination costs 
 185
Vacated leased office space 
 130
Total pre-tax restructuring costs $
 $3,770

Note 1512 Shareholders’Shareholders' Equity

Share Repurchases

Effective September 30, 2017, the Company's board of directors authorized the repurchase of up to $150.0 million in common shares through September 30, 2019. During the nine months ended September 30, 2018, the Company repurchased 124,606 shares at an average price of $72.26 per share for an aggregate purchase price of $9.0 million related to this authorization. The Company has $141.0 million remaining under this authorization.

Effective August 14, 2015, the Company's board of directors authorized the repurchase of up to $150.0 million in common shares through September 30, 2017. During the nine months ended September 30, 2017, the Company repurchased 36,936 shares at an average price of $67.62 per share for an aggregate purchase price of $2.5 million related to this authorization. During the nine months ended September 30, 2016, the Company repurchased 1,536,226 shares at an average price of $38.89 per share for an aggregate purchase price of $59.7 million related to this authorization. This authorization expired on September 30, 2017.

On August 10, 2017, the Company's board of directors authorized the repurchase of up to $150.0 million in common shares, effective from September 30, 2017 through September 30, 2019.

The Company also purchases shares of common stock from restricted stock award recipients upon the award vesting as recipients sell shares to meet their employment tax obligations. The Company purchased 308,801264,254 shares and 255,164308,801 shares, or $22.622.7 million and $10.7$22.6 million of the Company’sCompany's common stock for this purpose during the nine months ended September 30, 20172018 and 2016,2017, respectively.

Issuance of Shares

The Company issues common shares out of treasury stock as a result of employee restricted share vesting and exercise transactions as discussed in Note 16.13. During the nine months ended September 30, 20172018 and 2016,2017, the Company issued 850,925840,043 shares and 731,758850,925 shares, respectively, related to these obligations.

Dividends

Beginning in 2017, the Company initiated the payment of a quarterly cash dividend to holders of its common stock. Thestock, which includes unvested restricted shares. In addition, the Company's board of directors determinesapproved a dividend policy with the declarationintention of returning a metric based on net income from the previous fiscal year. This includes an annual special cash dividend, payable in the first quarter of each year, beginning in 2018.

During the nine months ended September 30, 2018, the Company declared and payment ofpaid quarterly cash dividends on a quarterly basis,its common stock, aggregating $1.125 per share, and is free to change the Company'san annual special cash dividend policy at any time.on its common stock of $1.62 per share, totaling $41.6 million.

On October 26, 2017,2018, the board of directors declared a cash dividend of $0.3125$0.375 per share to be paid on December 15, 2017,14, 2018, to shareholders of record as of the close of business on November 29, 2017. During28, 2018.


28

Table of Contents
Piper Jaffray Companies
Notes to the nine months ended September 30, 2017, the Company declared and paid dividends of $0.9375 per share, totaling $14.2 million.Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)

Noncontrolling Interests

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Piper Jaffray Companies, its wholly owned subsidiaries and other entities in which the Company has a controlling financial interest. Noncontrolling interests represent equity interests in consolidated entities that are not attributable, either directly or indirectly, to Piper Jaffray Companies. Noncontrolling interests include the minority equity holders’holders' proportionate share of the equity in merchant banking funds of $35.1$42.0 million and a senior living fund aggregating $13.4$5.2 million as of September 30, 2017.2018. As of December 31, 2016,2017, noncontrolling interests included the minority equity holders’holders' proportionate share of the equity in a merchant banking fundfunds of $35.0 million, a municipal bond fund with employee investors of $9.2$42.7 million and a senior living fund aggregating $12.8$5.2 million.

Ownership interests in entities held by parties other than the Company’sCompany's common shareholders are presented as noncontrolling interests within shareholders’shareholders' equity, separate from the Company’sCompany's own equity. Revenues, expenses and net income or loss are reported on the consolidated statements of operations on a consolidated basis, which includes amounts attributable to both the Company’sCompany's common shareholders and noncontrolling interests. Net income or loss is then allocated between the Company and noncontrolling interests based upon their relative ownership interests. Net income applicable to noncontrolling interests is deducted from consolidated net income to determine net income applicable to the Company. There was no other comprehensive income or loss attributed to noncontrolling interests for the nine months ended September 30, 2018 and 2017, and 2016, respectively.


32

Table of Contents
Piper Jaffray Companies
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)

The following table presents the changes in shareholders' equity for the nine months ended September 30, 2017:2018:
Common Common   TotalCommon Common   Total
Shares Shareholders’ Noncontrolling Shareholders’Shares Shareholders' Noncontrolling Shareholders'
(Amounts in thousands, except share amounts)Outstanding Equity Interests EquityOutstanding Equity Interests Equity
Balance at December 31, 201612,391,970
 $759,250
 $57,016
 $816,266
Balance at December 31, 201712,911,149
 $693,332
 $47,903
 $741,235
Net income/(loss)
 (15,865) 3,217
 (12,648)
 38,852
 (1,271) 37,581
Dividends
 (14,228) 
 (14,228)
 (41,631) 
 (41,631)
Amortization/issuance of restricted stock (1)
 31,163
 
 31,163

 44,541
 
 44,541
Issuance of treasury shares for options exercised26,149
 1,703
 
 1,703
Issuance of treasury shares for restricted stock vestings824,776
 
 
 
840,043
 
 
 
Repurchase of common stock through share repurchase program(36,936) (2,497) 
 (2,497)(124,606) (9,004) 
 (9,004)
Repurchase of common stock for employee tax withholding(308,801) (22,568) 
 (22,568)(264,254) (22,660) 
 (22,660)
Shares reserved/issued for director compensation2,744
 171
 
 171
4,371
 348
 
 348
Other comprehensive income
 1,137
 
 1,137

 30
 
 30
Fund capital distributions, net
 
 (11,714) (11,714)
Balance at September 30, 201712,899,902
 $738,266
 $48,519
 $786,785
Cumulative effect upon adoption of new accounting standard, net of tax (1)
 (3,597) 
 (3,597)
Fund capital contributions, net
 
 572
 572
Balance at September 30, 201813,366,703
 $700,211
 $47,204
 $747,415
(1)Includes amortizationCumulative effect adjustment upon adoption of restricted stockASU 2014-09, as part of deal consideration for the acquisition of Simmons.amended. See Note 32 for further discussion.



33
29

Table of Contents
Piper Jaffray Companies
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)

Note 1613 Compensation Plans

Stock-Based Compensation Plans

The Company maintains two stock-based compensation plans, the Piper Jaffray Companies Amended and Restated 2003 Annual and Long-Term Incentive Plan (the "Incentive Plan") and the 2016 Employment Inducement Award Plan (the "Inducement Plan"). The Company’sCompany's equity awards are recognized on the consolidated statements of operations at grant date fair value over the service period of the award, less forfeitures.

The following table provides a summary of the Company’sCompany's outstanding equity awards (in shares or units) as of September 30, 20172018:
Incentive Plan 
Restricted Stock 
Annual grants906,347657,185
Sign-on grants247,34170,627
 1,153,688727,812
Inducement Plan 
Restricted Stock260,231254,058
  
Total restricted stock related to compensation1,413,919981,870
  
Simmons Deal Consideration (1)821,141772,764
  
Total restricted stock outstanding2,235,0601,754,634
  
Incentive Plan 
Restricted Stock Units 
Leadership grants273,574194,251
Incentive Plan
Stock Options81,667
(1)The Company issued restricted stock with service conditions as part of deal consideration for the acquisition of Simmons. See Note 3 for further discussion.Simmons & Company International ("Simmons") on February 26, 2016.

Incentive Plan

The Incentive Plan permits the grant of equity awards, including restricted stock, restricted stock units and non-qualified stock options, to the Company’sCompany's employees and directors for up to 8.2 million shares of common stock (1.0(0.8 million shares remained available for future issuance under the Incentive Plan as of September 30, 20172018). The Company believes that such awards help align the interests of employees and directors with those of shareholders and serve as an employee retention tool. The Incentive Plan provides for accelerated vesting of awards if there is a severance event, a change in control of the Company (as defined in the Incentive Plan), in the event of a participant’sparticipant's death, and at the discretion of the compensation committee of the Company’sCompany's board of directors.

Restricted Stock Awards

Restricted stock grants are valued at the market price of the Company’sCompany's common stock on the date of grant and are amortized over the requisite service period. The Company grants shares of restricted stock to employees as part of year-end compensation ("Annual Grants") and upon initial hiring or as a retention award ("Sign-on Grants").


34

Table of Contents
Piper Jaffray Companies
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)

The Company’sCompany's Annual Grants are made each year in February. Annual Grants vest ratably over three years in equal installments. The Annual Grants provide for continued vesting after termination of employment, so long as the employee does not violate certain post-termination restrictions set forth in the award agreement or any agreements entered into upon termination. The Company determined the service inception date precedes the grant date for the Annual Grants, and that the post-termination restrictions do

30

Table of Contents
Piper Jaffray Companies
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)

not meet the criteria for an in-substance service condition, as defined by ASC 718.FASB Accounting Standards Codification Topic 718, "Compensation — Stock Compensation." Accordingly, restricted stock granted as part of the Annual Grants is expensed in the one-year period in which those awards are deemed to be earned, which is generally the calendar year preceding the February grant date. For example, the Company recognized compensation expense during fiscal 20162017 for its February 20172018 Annual Grant. If an equity award related to the Annual Grants is forfeited as a result of violating the post-termination restrictions, the lower of the fair value of the award at grant date or the fair value of the award at the date of forfeiture is recorded within the consolidated statements of operations as a reversal of compensation expense.

Sign-on Grants are used as a recruiting tool for new employees and are issued to current employees as a retention tool. These awards have both cliff and ratable vesting terms, and the employees must fulfill service requirements in exchange for rights to the awards. Compensation expense is amortized on a straight-line basis from the grant date over the requisite service period, generally one to five years. Employees forfeit unvested shares upon termination of employment and a reversal of compensation expense is recorded.

Annually, the Company grants stock to its non-employee directors. The stock-based compensation paid to non-employee directors is fully expensed on the grant date and included within outside services expense on the consolidated statements of operations.

Restricted Stock Units

The Company grants restricted stock units to its leadership team ("Leadership Grants").

2018 and 2017 Leadership GrantGrants

Restricted stock units granted in 2018 and 2017 will vest and convert to shares of common stock at the end of theeach 36-month performance period only if the Company satisfies predetermined performance and/or market conditions over the 36-month performance period from January 1, 2017 through December 31, 2019.period. Under the terms of the award,these awards, the number of units that will actually vest and convert to shares will be based on the extent to which the Company achieves specified targets during theeach performance period. The maximum payout leverage under this grantthese grants is 150 percent.

Up to 75 percent of the award can be earned based on the Company achieving certain average adjusted return on equity targets, as defined in the terms of the award agreement.agreements. The fair value of this portion of the award was based on the closing price of the Company's common stock on the grant date. If the Company determines that it is probable that the performance condition will be achieved, compensation expense is amortized on a straight-line basis over the 36-month performance period. The probability that the performance condition will be achieved is reevaluated each reporting period with changes in estimated outcomes accounted for using a cumulative effect adjustment to compensation expense. Compensation expense will be recognized only if the performance condition is met. Employees forfeit unvested sharerestricted stock units upon termination of employment with a corresponding reversal of compensation expense. As of September 30, 2017,2018, the Company has determined that the performance condition is probable of achieving 50 percent of the grant2018 award and 75 percent of the 2017 award.

Up to 75 percent of the award can be earned based on the Company’sCompany's total shareholder return relative to members of a predetermined peer group. The market condition must be met for the awardawards to vest and compensation cost will be recognized regardless if the market condition is satisfied. Compensation expense is amortized on a straight-line basis over the 36-month requisite service period. Employees forfeit unvested sharerestricted stock units upon termination of employment with a corresponding reversal of compensation expense. For this portion of the award,awards, the fair value on the grant date was determined using a Monte Carlo simulation with the following assumptions:
 Risk-free Expected Stock Risk-free Expected Stock
Grant Year Interest Rate Price Volatility Interest Rate Price Volatility
2018 2.40% 34.8%
2017 1.62% 35.9% 1.62% 35.9%


3531

Table of Contents
Piper Jaffray Companies
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)

Because the market condition portion of the awardawards vesting dependsdepend on the Company’sCompany's total shareholder return relative to a peer group, the valuation modeled the performance of the peer group as well as the correlation between the Company and the peer group. The expected stock price volatility assumption wasassumptions were determined using historical volatility, as correlation coefficients can only be developed through historical volatility. The risk-free interest rate wasrates were determined based on the three-year U.S. Treasury bond yield.yields.

In the fourth quarter of 2017, the compensation committee of the Company's board of directors included defined retirement provisions in its Leadership Grants, beginning with the February 2018 grant. Certain grantees meeting defined age and service requirements will be fully vested in the awards as long as performance and post-termination obligations are met throughout the performance period. These retirement-eligible grants are expensed in the period in which those awards are deemed to be earned, which is the calendar year preceding the February grant date. For example, the Company recognized compensation expense for retirement-eligible grantees in fiscal 2017 for its February 2018 Leadership Grant.

Leadership Grants Prior to 2017

Restricted stock units granted prior to 2017 contain market condition criteria and will vest and convert to shares of common stock at the end of each 36-month performance period only if the Company's stock performance satisfies predetermined market conditions over the performance period. Under the terms of the grants, the number of units that will vest and convert to shares will be based on the Company's stock performance achieving specified targets during each performance period. Compensation expense is recognized over each 36-month performance period.

Up to 50 percent of these awards can be earned based on the Company’sCompany's total shareholder return relative to members of a predetermined peer group and up to 50 percent of the awards can be earned based on the Company’sCompany's total shareholder return. The fair value of the awards on the grant date was determined using a Monte Carlo simulation with the following assumptions pursuant to the methodology above:
  Risk-free Expected Stock
Grant Year Interest Rate Price Volatility
2016 0.98% 34.9%
2015 0.90% 29.8%

Stock Options

On February 15, 2018, the Company granted options to certain executive officers. These options are expensed on a straight-line basis over the required service period of five years, based on the estimated fair value of the award on the date of grant. The exercise price per share is equal to the closing price on the date of grant plus ten percent. These options are subject to graded vesting, beginning on the third anniversary of the grant date, so long as the employee remains continuously employed by the Company. The maximum term of these stock options is ten years.

The fair value of this stock option award was estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following assumptions:
  Risk-free Expected Stock
Grant Year Interest Rate Price Volatility
2016 0.98% 34.9%
2015 0.90% 29.8%
2014 0.82% 41.3%
Risk-free interest rate2.82%
Dividend yield3.22%
Expected stock price volatility37.20%
Expected life of options (in years)7.0
Fair value of options granted (per share)$24.49

The risk-free interest rate assumption was based on the U.S. Treasury bond yield with a maturity equal to the expected life of the options. The dividend yield assumption was based on the assumed dividend payout over the expected life of the options. The expected stock price volatility assumptions wereassumption was determined using historical volatility, as correlation coefficients can only be developed through historical volatility. The risk-free interest rates were determined based on three-year U.S. Treasury bond yields.

Stock Options

The Company previously granted options to purchase
32

Table of Contents
Piper Jaffray Companies common stock to employees and non-employee directors in fiscal years 2004 through 2008. Employee and director options were expensed by the Company on a straight-line basis over the required service period, based on the estimated fair value of the award on the date of grant using a Black-Scholes option-pricing model. As described above pertaining
Notes to the Company’s Annual Grants of restricted shares, stock options granted to employees were expensed in the calendar year preceding the annual February grant date. For example, the Company recognized compensation expense during fiscal 2007 for its February 2008 option grant. The maximum term of the stock options granted to employees and directors was ten years. The Company has not granted stock options since 2008, and all awards have been exercised or expired as of March 31, 2017.Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)

Inducement Plan

The Company established the Inducement Plan in conjunction with the acquisition of Simmons. The Company granted $11.6 million (286,776 shares) in restricted stock under the Inducement Plan on May 15,16, 2016. These shares cliff vest in three years.on May 16, 2019. Inducement Plan awards are amortized as compensation expense on a straight-line basis over the vesting period. Employees forfeit unvested Inducement Plan shares upon termination of employment and a reversal of compensation expense is recorded.

Stock-Based Compensation Activity

The Company recorded compensation expense of $13.5 million and $17.9 million forfollowing table summarizes the three months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively, and $25.8 million and $42.0 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively, related to employee restricted stock and restricted stock unit awards. Forfeitures were $0.7 million and $0.5 million for the three months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively, and $3.0 million and $0.6 million, for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively. The tax benefit related toCompany's stock-based compensation totaled $4.5 million and $5.2 million for the three months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively, and $16.2 million and $11.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively.


expense:
36

Table of Contents
Piper Jaffray Companies
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
 Three Months Ended Nine Months Ended
 September 30, September 30,
(amounts in millions)2018 2017 2018 2017
Stock-based compensation expense$12.7
 $13.5
 $31.1
 $25.8
Forfeitures0.2
 0.7
 0.7
 3.0
Tax benefit related to stock-based compensation expense2.3
 4.2
 5.2
 7.1

The following table summarizes the changes in the Company’sCompany's unvested restricted stock:
Unvested Weighted AverageUnvested Weighted Average
Restricted Stock Grant DateRestricted Stock Grant Date
(in Shares) Fair Value      (in Shares) Fair Value      
December 31, 20162,874,117
 $43.12
December 31, 20172,225,617
 $46.40
Granted241,691
 77.95
291,597
 89.31
Vested(701,380) 44.85
(745,578) 49.03
Canceled(179,368) 42.68
(17,002) 51.18
September 30, 20172,235,060
 $46.38
September 30, 20181,754,634
 $52.36

The following table summarizes the changes in the Company’sCompany's unvested restricted stock units:
Unvested Weighted AverageUnvested Weighted Average
Restricted Grant DateRestricted Grant Date
Stock Units       Fair Value      Stock Units       Fair Value      
December 31, 2016374,460
 $21.63
December 31, 2017244,772
 $27.89
Granted35,981
 84.10
53,796
 92.93
Vested(115,290) 23.42
(86,511) 21.83
Canceled(21,577) 27.81
(17,806) 23.91
September 30, 2017273,574
 $28.61
September 30, 2018194,251
 $48.97
 
As of September 30, 20172018, there was $29.49.1 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to restricted stock and restricted stock units expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 1.6 years.1.0 year.

The following table summarizes the changes in the Company’sCompany's outstanding stock options:
     Weighted Average  
   Weighted Remaining  
 Options Average Contractual Term Aggregate
 Outstanding       Exercise Price      (in Years) Intrinsic Value
December 31, 201630,613
 $65.86
 0.3 $203,291
Granted
 
    
Exercised(26,149) 65.13
    
Canceled
 
    
Expired(4,464) 70.13
    
September 30, 2017
 $
 0.0 $

As of September 30, 2017, there was no unrecognized compensation cost related to stock options expected to be recognized over future years. The intrinsic value of options exercised was $0.3 million and the resulting tax benefit realized was $0.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2017. The intrinsic value of options exercised and the resulting tax benefit realized were immaterial for the nine months ended September 30, 2016.

     Weighted Average  
   Weighted Remaining  
 Options Average Contractual Term Aggregate
 Outstanding       Exercise Price      (in Years) Intrinsic Value
December 31, 2017
 $
 0.0 $
Granted81,667
 99.00
    
Exercised
 
    
Canceled
 
    
September 30, 201881,667
 $99.00
 9.4 $

3733

Table of Contents
Piper Jaffray Companies
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)


As of September 30, 2018, there was $1.8 million of unrecognized compensation cost related to stock options expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 4.4 years. There were no options exercised during the nine months ended September 30, 2018.

Acquisition-related Compensation Arrangements

The Company entered into acquisition-related compensation arrangements with certain employees for retention purposes. Additional cash compensation may be available to certain investment banking employees subject to exceeding an investment banking revenue threshold during the three year Simmons post-acquisition period to the extent they are employed by the Company at the time of payment. Amounts estimated to be payable related to this performance award plan will be recorded as compensation expense on the consolidated statements of operations over the requisite performance period of three years. As of September 30, 2018, the Company had accrued $38.0 million related to this performance award plan. The Company recorded compensation expense of $0.6 million and $7.4 million for the three months ended September 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively, and $7.2 million and $10.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively, related to this performance award plan.

Deferred Compensation Plans

The Company maintains various deferred compensation arrangements for employees.

The nonqualified deferred compensation plan is an unfunded plan which allows certain highly compensated employees, at their election, to defer a percentage of their base salary, commissions and/or cash bonuses. The deferrals vest immediately and are non-forfeitable. The amounts deferred under this plan are held in a grantor trust. The Company invests, as a principal, in investments to economically hedge its obligation under the nonqualified deferred compensation plan. Investments in the grantor trust, consisting of mutual funds, totaled $29.933.0 million and $24.4$31.5 million as of September 30, 20172018 and December 31, 2016,2017, respectively, and are included in investments on the consolidated statements of financial condition. The compensation deferred by the employees is expensed in the period earned. The deferred compensation liability was $30.033.1 million and $24.5$31.6 million as of September 30, 20172018 and December 31, 2016,2017, respectively. Changes in the fair value of the investments made by the Company are reported in investment income and changes in the corresponding deferred compensation liability are reflected as compensation and benefits expense on the consolidated statements of operations. On August 9, 2017, the Company's board of directors approved the discontinuance of future deferral elections by participants for performance periods beginning after December 31, 2017.

The Piper Jaffray Companies Mutual Fund Restricted Share Investment Plan is a fully funded deferred compensation plan which allows eligible employees to elect to receive a portion of the incentive compensation they would otherwise receive in the form of restricted stock, instead in restricted mutual fund shares ("MFRS Awards") of investment funds. MFRS Awards are awarded to qualifying employees in February of each year, and represent a portion of their compensation for performance in the preceding year similar to the Company's Annual Grants. MFRS Awards vest ratably over three years in equal installments and provide for continued vesting after termination of employment so long as the employee does not violate certain post-termination restrictions set forth in the award agreement or any agreement entered into upon termination. Forfeitures are recorded as a reduction of compensation and benefits expense within the consolidated statements of operations. MFRS Awards are owned by employee recipients (subject to aforementioned vesting restrictions) and as such are not included on the consolidated statements of financial condition.

The Company has also granted MFRS Awards to new employees as a recruiting tool. Employees must fulfill service requirements in exchange for rights to the awards. Compensation expense from these awards are amortized on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period of two to five years.




3834

Table of Contents
Piper Jaffray Companies
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)

Note 1714 Earnings Per Share ("EPS")

The Company calculates earnings per share using the two-class method. Basic earnings per common share is computed by dividing net income/(loss)income applicable to Piper Jaffray Companies’Companies' common shareholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Net income/(loss)income applicable to Piper Jaffray Companies’Companies' common shareholders represents net income/(loss)income applicable to Piper Jaffray Companies reduced by the allocation of earnings to participating securities. No allocation of undistributed earnings is made for periods in which a loss is incurred.incurred, or for periods in which cash dividends exceed net income resulting in an undistributed loss. Distributed earnings (e.g., dividends) are allocated to participating securities. All of the Company’sCompany's unvested restricted shares are deemed to be participating securities as they are eligible to share in the profits (e.g., receive dividends) of the Company. The Company’sCompany's restricted stock units are not participating securities as they are not eligible to receive dividends, or the dividends are forfeitable until vested. Diluted earnings per common share is calculated by adjusting the weighted average outstanding shares to assume conversion of all potentially dilutive stock options and restricted stock units.

The computation of earnings per share is as follows:
Three Months Ended Nine Months EndedThree Months Ended Nine Months Ended 
September 30, September 30,September 30, September 30, 
(Amounts in thousands, except per share data)2017 2016 2017 20162018 2017 2018 2017 
Net income/(loss) applicable to Piper Jaffray Companies$(49,713) $10,658
 $(15,865) $15,033
$22,023
 $(49,713) $38,852
 $(15,865) 
Earnings allocated to participating securities (1)(702) (2,076) (2,241) (2,557)(2,646) (702) (5,202) (2,241) 
Net income/(loss) applicable to Piper Jaffray Companies’ common shareholders (2)$(50,415) $8,582
 $(18,106) $12,476
Net income/(loss) applicable to Piper Jaffray Companies' common shareholders (2)$19,377
 $(50,415) $33,650
 $(18,106) 
               
Shares for basic and diluted calculations:               
Average shares used in basic computation12,898
 12,282
 12,774
 12,787
13,343
 12,898
 13,248
 12,774
 
Stock options
 16
 
 14
Restricted stock units77
 
 171
 
165
 77
 196
 171
 
Average shares used in diluted computation12,975
(3)12,298
 12,945
(3)12,801
13,508
 12,975
(3)13,444
(3)12,945
(3)
               
Earnings/(loss) per common share:               
Basic$(3.91) $0.70
 $(1.42) $0.98
$1.45
 $(3.91) $2.54
 $(1.42) 
Diluted$(3.91)(3)$0.70
 $(1.42)(3)$0.97
$1.43
 $(3.91)(3)$2.50
(3)$(1.42)(3)
(1)
Represents the allocation of distributed and undistributed earnings to participating securities. No allocation of undistributed earnings is made for periods in which a loss is incurred.incurred, or for periods in which cash dividends exceed net income resulting in an undistributed loss. Distributed earnings (e.g., dividends) are allocated to participating securities. Participating securities include all of the Company’sCompany's unvested restricted shares. The weighted average participating shares outstanding were 2,246,6631,842,036 and 2,974,6762,246,663 for the three months ended September 30, 20172018 and 2016,2017, respectively, and 2,389,7551,944,946 and 2,623,0952,389,755 for the nine months ended September 30, 20172018 and 2016,2017, respectively.
(2)
Net income/(loss)income applicable to Piper Jaffray Companies’Companies' common shareholders for diluted and basic EPS may differ under the two-class method as a result of adding the effect of the assumed exercise of stock options and restricted stock units to dilutive shares outstanding, which alters the ratio used to allocate earnings to Piper Jaffray Companies’Companies' common shareholders and participating securities for purposes of calculating diluted and basic EPS.
(3)Earnings per diluted common share is calculated using the basic weighted average number of common shares outstanding for periods in which a loss is incurred.incurred, or for periods in which cash dividends exceed net income resulting in an undistributed loss. Common shares of 1,754,634 and 2,235,060 were excluded from diluted EPS at September 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively, as the Company had a net lossundistributed losses for these periods.

The anti-dilutive effects from stock options and restricted stock units were immaterial for the nine months ended September 30, 20172018 and 20162017, respectively.


3935

Table of Contents
Piper Jaffray Companies
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)

Note 1815 Segment Reporting

Basis for Presentation

The Company structures its segments primarily based upon the nature of the financial products and services provided to customers and the Company’sCompany's management organization. The Company evaluates performance and allocates resources based on segment pre-tax operating income or loss and segment pre-tax operating margin. Revenues and expenses directly associated with each respective segment are included in determining their operating results. Other revenues and expenses that are not directly attributable to a particular segment are allocated based upon the Company’sCompany's allocation methodologies, including each segment’ssegment's respective net revenues, use of shared resources, headcount or other relevant measures. Segment assets are based on those directly associated with each segment, and include an allocation of certain assets based on the most relevant measures applicable, including headcount and other factors. The substantial majority of the Company's net revenues and long-lived assets are located in the U.S.

Reportable segment financial results are as follows:
Three Months Ended Nine Months EndedThree Months Ended Nine Months Ended
September 30, September 30,September 30, September 30,
(Dollars in thousands)2017 2016 2017 20162018 2017 2018 2017
              
Capital Markets              
Investment banking              
Advisory services$113,540
 $146,816
 $266,083
 $332,205
Financing              
Equities$22,117
 $30,479
 $70,229
 $53,831
32,188
 22,117
 99,868
 70,229
Debt21,687
 30,898
 60,066
 80,195
20,936
 21,687
 45,473
 60,066
Advisory services146,816
 75,230
 332,205
 204,971
Total investment banking190,620
 136,607
 462,500
 338,997
166,664
 190,620
 411,424
 462,500
              
Institutional sales and trading              
Equities18,410
 20,492
 59,085
 62,773
17,804
 18,410
 54,951
 59,085
Fixed income20,676
 25,812
 63,137
 71,818
18,162
 20,676
 52,932
 63,137
Total institutional sales and trading39,086
 46,304
 122,222
 134,591
35,966
 39,086
 107,883
 122,222
              
Management and performance fees678
 1,353
 4,172
 4,112
1,806
 678
 4,824
 4,172
              
Investment income/(loss)(660) 4,472
 15,155
 14,009
3,166
 (660) 7,607
 15,155
              
Long-term financing expenses(1,736) (2,253) (6,003) (6,838)(1,732) (1,736) (5,351) (6,003)
              
Net revenues227,988
 186,483
 598,046
 484,871
205,870
 227,988
 526,387
 598,046
              
Operating expenses (1)196,409
 169,745
 524,702
 460,628
176,783
 196,409
 482,024
 524,702
              
Segment pre-tax operating income$31,579
 $16,738
 $73,344
 $24,243
$29,087
 $31,579
 $44,363
 $73,344
              
Segment pre-tax operating margin13.9 % 9.0% 12.3 % 5.0%14.1% 13.9 % 8.4 % 12.3 %
              
Continued on next page

4036

Table of Contents
Piper Jaffray Companies
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)

Three Months Ended Nine Months EndedThree Months Ended Nine Months Ended
September 30, September 30,September 30, September 30,
(Dollars in thousands)2017 2016 2017 20162018 2017 2018 2017
              
Asset Management              
Management and performance fees              
Management fees$12,140
 $13,903
 $39,839
 $39,587
$11,571
 $12,140
 $33,874
 $39,839
Performance fees
 
 
 

 
 8
 
Total management and performance fees12,140
 13,903
 39,839
 39,587
11,571
 12,140
 33,882
 39,839
              
Investment income439
 461
 956
 428
Investment income/(loss)87
 439
 (198) 956
              
Net revenues12,579
 14,364
 40,795
 40,015
11,658
 12,579
 33,684
 40,795
              
Operating expenses (1)126,394
 12,651
 153,699
 35,856
11,110
 126,394
 35,115
 153,699
              
Segment pre-tax operating income/(loss)$(113,815) $1,713
 $(112,904) $4,159
$548
 $(113,815) $(1,431) $(112,904)
              
Segment pre-tax operating margin(904.8)% 11.9% (276.8)% 10.4%4.7% (904.8)% (4.2)% (276.8)%
              
              
Total              
Net revenues$240,567
 $200,847
 $638,841
 $524,886
$217,528
 $240,567
 $560,071
 $638,841
              
Operating expenses (1)322,803
 182,396
 678,401
 496,484
Operating expenses187,893
 322,803
 517,139
 678,401
              
Pre-tax operating income/(loss)$(82,236) $18,451
 $(39,560) $28,402
$29,635
 $(82,236) $42,932
 $(39,560)
              
Pre-tax operating margin(34.2)% 9.2% (6.2)% 5.4%13.6% (34.2)% 7.7 % (6.2)%
(1)Operating expenses include a $114.4 million goodwill impairment charge for the Asset Management segment for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017, as well as intangible asset amortization as set forth in the table below:     
Three Months Ended Nine Months EndedThree Months Ended Nine Months Ended
September 30, September 30,September 30, September 30,
(Dollars in thousands)2017 2016 2017 20162018 2017 2018 2017
Capital Markets$2,544
 $6,623
 $7,633
 $11,239
$1,214
 $2,544
 $3,643
 $7,633
Asset Management1,278
 1,387
 3,833
 4,161
1,401
 1,278
 4,202
 3,833
Total intangible asset amortization$3,822
 $8,010
 $11,466
 $15,400
$2,615
 $3,822
 $7,845
 $11,466

Reportable segment assets are as follows:
September 30, December 31,September 30, December 31,
(Dollars in thousands)2017 20162018 2017
Capital Markets$1,627,722
 $1,934,528
$1,411,590
 $1,933,050
Asset Management112,114
 190,975
81,846
 91,633
Total assets$1,739,836
 $2,125,503
$1,493,436
 $2,024,683




4137

Table of Contents
Piper Jaffray Companies
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)

Note 1916 Net Capital Requirements and Other Regulatory Matters

Piper Jaffray is registered as a securities broker dealer with the SEC and is a member of various SROs and securities exchanges. The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc. ("FINRA") serves as Piper Jaffray’sJaffray's primary SRO. Piper Jaffray is subject to the uniform net capital rule of the SEC and the net capital rule of FINRA. Piper Jaffray has elected to use the alternative method permitted by the SEC rule which requires that it maintain minimum net capital of $1.0 million. Advances to affiliates, repayment of subordinated debt, dividend payments and other equity withdrawals by Piper Jaffray are subject to certain approvals, notifications and other provisions of SEC and FINRA rules.

At September 30, 2017,2018, net capital calculated under the SEC rule was $215.5$199.1 million, and exceeded the minimum net capital required under the SEC rule by $214.5$198.1 million.

The Company’sCompany's committed short-term credit facility and its senior notes include covenants requiring Piper Jaffray to maintain minimum net capital of $120 million. CP Notes issued under CP Series II A include a covenant that requires Piper Jaffray to maintain excess net capital of $100 million. The Company's fully disclosed clearing agreement with Pershing also includes a covenant requiring Piper Jaffray to maintain excess net capital of $120 million.

Piper Jaffray Ltd., a broker dealer subsidiary registered in the United Kingdom, is subject to the capital requirements of the Prudential Regulation Authority and the Financial Conduct Authority. As of September 30, 2017,2018, Piper Jaffray Ltd. was in compliance with the capital requirements of the Prudential Regulation Authority and the Financial Conduct Authority.

Piper Jaffray Hong Kong Limited is licensed by the Hong Kong Securities and Futures Commission, which is subject to the liquid capital requirements of the Securities and Futures (Financial Resources) Rule promulgated under the Securities and Futures Ordinance. At September 30, 2017,2018, Piper Jaffray Hong Kong Limited was in compliance with the liquid capital requirements of the Hong Kong Securities and Futures Commission.

Note 2017 Income Taxes

The Company recorded income tax expense of $7.4 million and $5.4 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2018, respectively. Income tax expense was reduced by a tax benefit of $0.4 million and $6.8 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2018, respectively, related to stock-based compensation awards vesting at values greater than the grant price.

The Company recorded an income tax benefit of $31.4 million and $26.9 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017, respectively, as a result of pre-tax losses related to the $114.4 million non-cash goodwill impairment charge for the asset management reporting unit, generating a $44.2 million deferred income tax asset. See Note 11 for additional information related to the goodwill impairment charge.

unit. The tax benefit related to stock-based compensation awards vesting at values greater than the grant price was $0.3 million and $9.1 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017, respectively. See Note 2 regarding the tax impact from the adoption of ASU 2016-09.

The Company's effectiveSEC Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 118, "Income Tax Accounting Implications of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act" ("SAB 118") permitted companies to report a provisional amount in the 2017 financial statements if the accounting for income tax rate, excluding noncontrolling interests,effects of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act was incomplete as of December 31, 2017. This provisional amount would be subject to adjustment during a defined measurement period.  Pursuant to SAB 118, the Company recorded an additional $1.0 million of income tax expense for the nine months ended September 30, 20172018.

Note 18Subsequent Event

The Company has entered into fixed rate senior notes with certain entities advised by Pacific Investment Management Company ("PIMCO"). The outstanding balance of the fixed rate Class C Notes was 62.9 percent, compared to 36.8 percent for the nine months ended$125.0 million at September 30, 2016.2018 and December 31, 2017. The effective taxfixed rate was higher forClass C Notes were repaid by the nine months ended September 30, 2017, due to the impact of the $9.1 million tax benefit related to stock-based compensation awards vesting at values greater than the grant price during a period of pre-tax losses.Company upon maturity on October 9, 2018.


4238


Table of Contents

ITEM 2.MANAGEMENT’SMANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS.

The following information should be read in conjunction with the accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements and related notes and exhibits included elsewhere in this report. Certain statements in this report may be considered forward-looking. Statements that are not historical or current facts, including statements about beliefs and expectations, are forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements include, among other things, statements other than historical information or statements of current condition and may relate to our future plans and objectives and results, and also may include our belief regarding the effect of various legal proceedings, as set forth under "Legal Proceedings" in Part I, Item 3 of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 20162017 and in our subsequent reports filed with the SEC. Forward-looking statements involve inherent risks and uncertainties, and important factors could cause actual results to differ materially from those anticipated, including those factors discussed below under "External Factors Impacting Our Business" as well as the factors identified under "Risk Factors" in Part I, Item 1A of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016,2017, as updated in our subsequent reports filed with the SEC and under "Risk Factors" in Part II, Item 1A of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. These reports are available at our Web site at www.piperjaffray.com and at the SEC Web site at www.sec.gov. Forward-looking statements speak only as of the date they are made, and we undertake no obligation to update them in light of new information or future events.

Explanation of Non-GAAP Financial Measures

We have included financial measures that are not prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles ("GAAP"). These non-GAAP financial measures include adjustments to exclude (1) revenues and expenses related to noncontrolling interests, (2) amortization of intangible assets related to acquisitions, (3) compensation and non-compensation expenses from acquisition-related agreements, (4) restructuring and acquisition integration costs andthe impact from remeasuring deferred tax assets resulting from changes to the U.S. federal tax code, (5) goodwill impairment charges.charges and (6) the impact of the annual special cash dividend paid in the first quarter of 2018 resulting in an undistributed loss on earnings per diluted common share. These adjustments affect the following financial measures: net revenues, compensation expenses, non-compensation expenses, income tax expense/(benefit), net incomeincome/(loss) applicable to Piper Jaffray Companies, earningsearnings/(loss) per diluted common share, return on average common shareholders' equity, segment net revenues, segment operating expenses, segment pre-tax operating incomeincome/(loss) and segment pre-tax operating margin. Management believes that presenting these results and measures on an adjusted basis in conjunction with the corresponding U.S. GAAP measures provides the most meaningful basis for comparison of our operating results across periods, and enhances the overall understanding of our current financial performance by excluding certain items that may not be indicative of our core operating results. The non-GAAP financial measures should be considered in addition to, not as a substitute for, measures of financial performance prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP.


43


Table of Contents

Executive Overview

Our business principally consists of providing investment banking, institutional brokerage, asset management and related financial services to corporations, private equity groups, public entities, non-profit entities and institutional investors in the United States and Europe. We operate through two reportable business segments: Capital Markets and Asset Management. Refer to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 20162017 for a full description of our business, including our strategic growth initiatives.

Our Asset Management segment has experienced declining profitability in 2017 as decreases in revenues relating to higher fee product offerings have not been fully offset by new revenues on assets gained in lower fee product offerings. The shift in revenue mix is attributable to our efforts to remix our product offerings to a broader set of more scalable products and an extended cycle of investors favoring passive investment vehicles over active management. We identified goodwill impairment indicators in the third quarter of 2017 necessitating a full impairment testing of goodwill. The interim impairment testing related to our Asset Management segment goodwill resulted in a pre-tax non-cash impairment charge of $114.4 million. For more information on our goodwill impairment testing, please refer to the "Critical Accounting Policies" section.
Financial Highlights
  Three Months Ended Nine Months Ended
(Amounts in thousands, except per share data) Sept. 30, Sept. 30, Percent Sept. 30, Sept. 30, Percent
 2017 2016 Inc/(Dec) 2017 2016 Inc/(Dec)
U.S. GAAP            
Net revenues $240,567
 $200,847
 19.8 % $638,841
 $524,886
 21.7%
Compensation and benefits expenses 169,469
 135,186
 25.4
 438,161
 356,770
 22.8
Non-compensation expenses 153,334
 47,210
 224.8
 240,240
 139,714
 72.0
Net income/(loss) applicable to Piper Jaffray Companies (49,713) 10,658
 N/M
 (15,865) 15,033
 N/M
Earnings/(loss) per diluted common share $(3.91) $0.70
 N/M
 $(1.42) $0.97
 N/M
             
Non-GAAP(1)
            
Adjusted net revenues $241,551
 $199,001
 21.4 % $633,961
 $518,396
 22.3%
Adjusted compensation and benefits expenses 155,160
 127,010
 22.2
 407,860
 335,226
 21.7
Adjusted non-compensation expenses 34,862
 38,632
 (9.8) 112,320
 112,220
 0.1
Adjusted net income applicable to Piper Jaffray Companies 32,521
 20,976
 55.0
 81,276
 45,523
 78.5
Adjusted earnings per diluted common share $2.13
 $1.37
 55.5
 $5.31
 $2.95
 80.0
N/M – Not meaningful


4439


Table of Contents

Financial Highlights
  Three Months Ended Nine Months Ended
(Amounts in thousands, except per share data) Sept. 30, Sept. 30, Percent Sept. 30, Sept. 30, Percent
 2018 2017 Inc/(Dec) 2018 2017 Inc/(Dec)
U.S. GAAP            
Net revenues $217,528
 $240,567
 (9.6)% $560,071
 $638,841
 (12.3)%
Compensation and benefits 139,151
 169,469
 (17.9) 369,895
 438,161
 (15.6)
Non-compensation expenses 48,742
 153,334
 (68.2) 147,244
 240,240
 (38.7)
Net income/(loss) applicable to Piper Jaffray Companies 22,023
 (49,713) N/M
 38,852
 (15,865) N/M
Earnings/(loss) per diluted common share $1.43
 $(3.91) N/M
 $2.50
 $(1.42) N/M
             
Non-GAAP(1)
            
Adjusted net revenues $215,652
 $241,551
 (10.7)% $557,714
 $633,961
 (12.0)%
Adjusted compensation and benefits 133,237
 155,160
 (14.1) 346,440
 407,860
 (15.1)
Adjusted non-compensation expenses 44,327
 34,862
 27.1
 135,259
 112,320
 20.4
Adjusted net income applicable to Piper Jaffray Companies 28,566
 32,521
 (12.2) 63,727
 81,276
 (21.6)
Adjusted earnings per diluted common share $1.86
 $2.13
 (12.7) $4.15
 $5.31
 (21.8)
N/M – Not meaningful

For the three months ended September 30, 20172018

Net revenues increased 19.8were down 9.6 percent from the year-ago period as significantly higherincreased equity financing revenues were more than offset by decreased revenues in our other businesses. Our advisory services revenues in the third quarter of 2017 were partially offsetelevated by lower equity and debt financing and institutional brokerage revenues.several large fees.
Compensation and benefits expenses increased 25.4decreased 17.9 percent compared with the prior-year period due to higherlower compensation expenses resulting from decreased revenues, as well as higherlower acquisition-related compensation costs.
The increaseNon-compensation expenses of $48.7 million in non-compensationthe third quarter of 2018 included $7.7 million of deal-related expenses. This reflects new accounting guidance effective in 2018 which requires investment banking client reimbursed deal expenses was driven byto be presented on a gross basis on the consolidated statements of operations, rather than the previous presentation of netting deal expenses within revenues. See further discussion on the accounting change related to deal expenses within the "Results of Operations" section below. Non-compensation expenses in the year-ago period included a $114.4 million non-cash goodwill impairment charge.charge associated with our asset management segment.

For the nine months ended September 30, 2018

Net revenues were down 12.3 percent from the year-ago period as increased equity financing revenues were more than offset by decreased revenues in our other businesses, as well as lower investment income.
Compensation and benefits expenses decreased 15.6 percent compared with the prior-year period primarily due to lower compensation expenses resulting from decreased revenues. We also recorded lower acquisition-related compensation costs.
Non-compensation expenses decreased 38.7 percent compared to the year-ago period, which included a $114.4 million non-cash goodwill impairment charge. Partially offsetting this decrease were $18.9 million of client reimbursed deal-related expenses in the first nine months of 2018 stemming from a change in accounting presentation, as discussed above, as well as $3.8 million of restructuring costs resulting from actions to reduce costs in our brokerage and asset management businesses given the challenging market conditions.
For the nine months ended September 30, 2017

Net revenues increased 21.7 percent from the year-ago period. Higher advisory services2018 and equity financing revenues were partially offset by lower debt financing and institutional brokerage revenues.
Compensation and benefits expenses increased 22.8 percent compared with the prior-year period due primarily to higher revenues.
Non-compensation expenses were up 72.0 percent compared to the year-ago period, driven by a $114.4 million goodwill impairment charge. Incremental back office conversion costs in the current period were more than offset by lower restructuring costs. In the first nine months of 2016, non-compensation expenses included $10.2 million of restructuring and integration costs primarily related to the acquisition of Simmons & Company International ("Simmons"), which we acquired on February 26, 2016.
For the nine months ended September 30, 2017, we recorded a tax benefit of $6.8 million and $9.1 million, respectively, related to restricted stockstock-based compensation awards vesting at values greater than the grant price. The tax benefit increased earnings per diluted common share by $0.51 and $0.71 in the first nine months of 2017.2018 and 2017, respectively.
For the twelve months ended September 30, 2017, our rolling twelve month return on average common shareholders' equity was a negative 6.8 percent due to the non-cash goodwill impairment charge, compared with 3.6 percent for the rolling twelve months ended September 30, 2016. On an adjusted basis, we generated a rolling twelve month return on average common shareholders' equity of 13.9 percent(2) for the twelve months ended September 30, 2017, compared with 8.4 percent(2) for the rolling twelve months ended September 30, 2016.


4540


Table of Contents

(1)Reconciliation of U.S. GAAP to adjusted non-GAAP financial information
Three Months Ended Nine Months EndedThree Months Ended Nine Months Ended
September 30, September 30,September 30, September 30,
(Amounts in thousands, except per share data)2017 2016 2017 20162018 2017 2018 2017
Net revenues:              
Net revenues – U.S. GAAP basis$240,567
 $200,847
 $638,841
 $524,886
$217,528
 $240,567
 $560,071
 $638,841
Adjustments:              
Revenue related to noncontrolling interests984
 (1,846) (4,880) (6,490)(1,876) 984
 (2,357) (4,880)
Adjusted net revenues$241,551
 $199,001
 $633,961
 $518,396
$215,652
 $241,551
 $557,714
 $633,961
              
Compensation and benefits:              
Compensation and benefits – U.S. GAAP basis$169,469
 $135,186
 $438,161
 $356,770
$139,151
 $169,469
 $369,895
 $438,161
Adjustments:              
Compensation from acquisition-related agreements(14,309) (8,176) (30,301) (21,544)(5,914) (14,309) (23,455) (30,301)
Adjusted compensation and benefits$155,160
 $127,010
 $407,860
 $335,226
$133,237
 $155,160
 $346,440
 $407,860
              
Non-compensation expenses:              
Non-compensation expenses – U.S. GAAP basis$153,334
 $47,210
 $240,240
 $139,714
$48,742
 $153,334
 $147,244
 $240,240
Adjustments:              
Non-compensation expenses related to noncontrolling interests(116) (568) (1,663) (1,888)(1,629) (116) (3,628) (1,663)
Restructuring and integration costs
 
 
 (10,206)
Goodwill impairment(114,363) 
 (114,363) 

 (114,363) 
 (114,363)
Amortization of intangible assets related to acquisitions(3,822) (8,010) (11,466) (15,400)(2,615) (3,822) (7,845) (11,466)
Non-compensation expenses from acquisition-related agreements(171) 
 (428) 
(171) (171) (512) (428)
Adjusted non-compensation expenses$34,862
 $38,632
 $112,320
 $112,220
$44,327
 $34,862
 $135,259
 $112,320
              
Net income/(loss) applicable to Piper Jaffray Companies:              
Net income/(loss) applicable to Piper Jaffray Companies – U.S. GAAP basis$(49,713) $10,658
 $(15,865) $15,033
$22,023
 $(49,713) $38,852
 $(15,865)
Adjustments:              
Compensation from acquisition-related agreements9,444
 5,424
 19,498
 14,067
4,447
 9,444
 17,637
 19,498
Restructuring and integration costs
 
 
 7,014
Goodwill impairment70,219
 
 70,219
 

 70,219
 
 70,219
Amortization of intangible assets related to acquisitions2,347
 4,894
 7,042
 9,409
1,967
 2,347
 5,901
 7,042
Non-compensation expenses from acquisition-related agreements

224
 
 382
 
129
 224
 385
 382
Impact of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act legislation
 
 952
 
Adjusted net income applicable to Piper Jaffray Companies$32,521
 $20,976
 $81,276
 $45,523
$28,566
 $32,521
 $63,727
 $81,276
              
Earnings/(loss) per diluted common share:              
Earnings/(loss) per diluted common share – U.S. GAAP basis$(3.91) $0.70
 $(1.42) $0.97
$1.43
 $(3.91) $2.50
 $(1.42)
Adjustment for loss allocated to participating shares (3)0.64
 
 0.39
 
Adjustment for undistributed loss allocated to participating shares (2)
 0.64
 0.03
 0.39
(3.27) 0.70
 (1.03) 0.97
1.43
 (3.27) 2.53
 (1.03)
Adjustments:              
Compensation from acquisition-related agreements0.62
 0.36
 1.27
 0.91
0.29
 0.62
 1.14
 1.27
Restructuring and integration costs
 
 
 0.45
Goodwill impairment4.61
 
 4.58
 

 4.61
 
 4.58
Amortization of intangible assets related to acquisitions0.15
 0.32
 0.46
 0.61
0.13
 0.15
 0.38
 0.46
Non-compensation expenses from acquisition-related agreements

0.02
 
 0.03
 
0.01
 0.02
 0.03
 0.03
Impact of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act legislation
 
 0.06
 
Adjusted earnings per diluted common share$2.13
 $1.37
 $5.31
 $2.95
$1.86
 $2.13
 $4.15
 $5.31
(2)Adjusted return on average common shareholders' equity, a non-GAAP financial measure, is computed by dividing adjusted net income applicable to Piper Jaffray Companies for the last 12 months by average monthly common shareholders' equity. For a detailed explanation of the components of adjusted net income, see "Reconciliation of U.S. GAAP to adjusted non-GAAP financial information" in footnote (1).
(3)Piper Jaffray Companies calculates earnings per common share using the two-class method, which requires the allocation of consolidated adjusted net income between common shareholders and participating security holders, which in the case of Piper Jaffray Companies, represents unvested stock with dividend rights. No allocation of undistributed earnings is made for periods in which a loss is incurred.incurred, or for periods in which the special cash dividend exceeds adjusted net income resulting in an undistributed loss.


46


Table of Contents

External Factors Impacting Our Business

Performance in the financial services industry in which we operate is highly correlated to the overall strength of economic conditions and financial market activity. Overall market conditions are a product of many factors, which are beyond our control, often unpredictable and at times inherently volatile. These factors may affect the financial decisions made by investors, including their level of participation in the financial markets. In turn, these decisions may affect our business results. With respect to financial market activity, our profitability is sensitive to a variety of factors, including the demand for investment banking services as reflected by the number and size of advisory transactions and equity and debt financings, and merger and acquisition transactions, the relative level of volatility of the equity and fixed income markets, changes in interest rates and credit spreads (especially rapid and extreme changes), overall market liquidity, the level and shape of various yield curves, the volume and value of trading in securities (although becoming less so for equity securities due to the unbundling of research services from trade execution), overall equity valuations, and the demand for active asset management services.


41


Table of Contents

Factors that differentiate our business within the financial services industry also may affect our financial results. For example, our capital markets business focuses on specific industry sectors while serving principally middle-market clientele. If the business environment for our focus sectors is impacted adversely, our business and results of operations could reflect these impacts. In addition, our business, with its specific areas of focus and investment, may not track overall market trends. Given the variability of the capital markets and securities businesses, our earnings may fluctuate significantly from period to period, and results for any individual period should not be considered indicative of future results.

Proposed Tax Reform Legislation

On November 2, 2017, the Committee on Ways and Means of the U.S. House of Representatives introduced the "Tax Cuts and Jobs Act," a bill which could have significant impacts to the federal tax code. Key provisions, as currently proposed, include a corporate rate reduction from 35 percent to 20 percent effective in 2018. A corporate rate reduction would result in a one-time non-cash write-off of an estimated $50 to $55 million of our deferred tax assets based on the lower proposed rate. In addition, certain corporate tax deductions may be repealed or amended. For example, corporate tax deductions for certain public company executive compensation in excess of $1 million will no longer be allowed. The proposed legislation may impact our employee compensation arrangements and certain sectors of our businesses, such as our public finance operations. With regard to our public finance operations, the repeal of advance refunding bonds and certain private activity bond issuances may be impacted by this proposed legislation. We will continue to monitor and evaluate the impact of this proposed legislation on our businesses.

Outlook for the remainder of 20172018

We would expect the U.S. economy to continue to grow at a slow and steadymoderate pace for the remainder of 2017. Administrative2018. Tax cuts and legislative policies, including increasedincreases in fiscal spending deregulation and tax reform, may provide catalystsshould continue to acceleratebe supportive to U.S. economic growth. However, uncertainty over the details of these policies, their timing, the probability of implementation and their transition, as well as politicalRisks to this outlook include geopolitical risks or international economic instability, internationally,including uncertainties surrounding trade policy. These risks and uncertainties may pose consequences for the global economy and inject periods of heightened volatility into the U.S. equity and debt markets. Through

U.S. monetary policy will continue to be a critical factor impacting the economy and financial markets. The U.S. Federal Reserve increased short-term interest rates three times in the first nine months of 2017,2018 on the U.S. Federal Reserve has increased short-termbasis of a more optimistic view of economic growth and higher inflation expectations. Long-term interest rates, two times on the expectation of stronger economic growth. However, long-term interest rateshowever, have not moved in step with increases in short-term interest rates resulting in a flattening of the yield curve. We anticipate that the U.S. Federal Reserve will attemptcontinue to pursue a gradual and steady path to rate normalization, absent significant shifts in tax and monetary policy. Resistance in long-term interest rates to these policies, however,although this path could produce an extended periodbe slightly steeper if the pace of a flat yield curve, which could adversely impact our fixed income sales and trading business. In addition, exogenous conditions may trigger episodes of volatility with respect to interest rates. A rising or volatile interest rate environment could manifest itself in changes to the yield curve or relative spreads which may have a mixed impact on certain of our businesses.inflation accelerates.

We expect conditions in the equity markets to remain conducive toconstructive for our advisory and equity capital raising and advisory activities forfinancing businesses, absent a major market disruption or periods of sustained market volatility. We have experienced a period of heightened volatility early in the remainderfourth quarter of 2017. While lower volatility benefits our capital raising business, it has the inverse effect on our equity sales and trading business.2018. If we experience sustained bouts of higher volatility or a material market correction, however, our equity brokerage business may benefit while ouradvisory and equity capital raising and advisory businesses may suffer. We believe our advisory services business will continue to perform well for the remainder of 20172018 based on the strengthour pipeline of our market position, recent investments, diversity in our practice, readily available capital and a combination of high CEO and small business confidence levels.deals. Advisory services revenues for any given quarter are impacted by the timing and size of the deals closing, which can result in fluctuations in revenues period over period. We believe that equity underwriting activity may slow in the fourth quarter of 2018 as recent market volatility and the November mid-term elections inject additional uncertainty into the market.

We expect that secular challenges to our equity brokerage business will persist for the remainder of 2018. The manner in which market participants pay for trade execution and research services is in transition at a time when the overall fee pool is shrinking. Increasingly, market participants are executing trades through low-touch execution providers and paying separately for research services. This dynamic has negatively impacted our equity institutional brokerage revenues.

Interest rates remain relatively low by historical standards, but have sharply increased recently. We expect the yield curve to remain relatively flat and interest rates to continue moving upwards, albeit with periods of volatility for the remainder of 2018. These market conditions will continue to subdue customer flow activity and depress volumes and trading spreads for our fixed income institutional brokerage business. While higher interest rates across the yield curve would be favorable to our fixed income institutional brokeragethis business over time, the move toexpectation of higher rates could adversely impactencourages investors to remain on the short end of the curve until interest rates stabilize at higher levels. In our public finance business, in the short-termhigher interest rates as the level ofwell as tax law changes have diminished refunding activity, eases

47


Table of Contents

and while greater economic growth has not yet spurred a ramp in new money issuance volumes. Althoughhas increased in 2018, it has not increased sufficiently to offset the outlook is constructive, we believe that municipal debt underwriting activity for the remainder of 2017 will remain at lower levels compareddecline in refundings. We have continued to the record market issuance volumesbuild momentum in 2016. Our geographic range, product capabilities, and industry expertise should serve to mitigate over time the impact of less favorable market conditions on the performance of our public finance business.business during the year from historically low levels in the first quarter of 2018, albeit down from robust 2017 levels.

As economic growth continues, we would expect risingAsset management revenues will continue to be affected by valuations and investment performance, as well as broad market trends. However, market valuations which have a positive impact on our asset management business. However, this impact may be erodednegatively impacted by the shift to passive investment strategies as extremely lowsignificant declines and volatility in a market with slow but steady growth generally favors lower-cost passive investment vehicles.the financial markets, as experienced early in the fourth quarter of 2018. We wouldfurther expect that active asset managers, ourselves included, will remain under pressure to create alpha for their clients and to maintain or grow AUM.



4842


Table of Contents

Results of Operations

Financial Summary for the three months ended September 30, 20172018 and September 30, 20162017

The following table provides a summary of the results of our operations on a U.S. GAAP basis and the results of our operations as a percentage of net revenues for the periods indicated.
      As a Percentage of      As a Percentage of
      Net Revenues for the      Net Revenues for the
Three Months Ended Three Months EndedThree Months Ended Three Months Ended
September 30, September 30,September 30, September 30,
    2017        2018    
(Dollars in thousands)2017 2016 v2016 2017 20162018 2017 v2017 2018 2017
Revenues:                  
Investment banking$190,482
 $136,682
 39.4 % 79.2 % 68.1%$166,458
 $190,482
 (12.6)% 76.5% 79.2 %
Institutional brokerage34,873
 42,189
 (17.3) 14.5
 21.0
31,738
 34,873
 (9.0) 14.6
 14.5
Asset management12,818
 15,256
 (16.0) 5.3
 7.6
13,377
 12,818
 4.4
 6.1
 5.3
Interest7,164
 7,343
 (2.4) 3.0
 3.7
6,592
 7,164
 (8.0) 3.0
 3.0
Investment income/(loss)(422) 4,806
 N/M
 (0.2) 2.4
3,068
 (422) N/M 1.4
 (0.2)
Total revenues244,915
 206,276
 18.7
 101.8
 102.7
221,233
 244,915
 (9.7) 101.7
 101.8
                  
Interest expense4,348
 5,429
 (19.9) 1.8
 2.7
3,705
 4,348
 (14.8) 1.7
 1.8
                  
Net revenues240,567
 200,847
 19.8
 100.0
 100.0
217,528
 240,567
 (9.6) 100.0
 100.0
                  
Non-interest expenses:                  
Compensation and benefits169,469
 135,186
 25.4
 70.4
 67.3
139,151
 169,469
 (17.9) 64.0
 70.4
Outside services7,495
 10,288
 (27.1) 3.1
 5.1
9,521
 7,495
 27.0
 4.4
 3.1
Occupancy and equipment8,127
 8,743
 (7.0) 3.4
 4.4
8,967
 8,127
 10.3
 4.1
 3.4
Communications7,136
 7,845
 (9.0) 3.0
 3.9
7,561
 7,136
 6.0
 3.5
 3.0
Marketing and business development6,683
 7,629
 (12.4) 2.8
 3.8
6,718
 6,683
 0.5
 3.1
 2.8
Deal-related expenses7,671
 
 N/M 3.5
 
Trade execution and clearance2,125
 2,008
 5.8
 0.9
 1.0
2,049
 2,125
 (3.6) 0.9
 0.9
Goodwill impairment114,363
 
 N/M
 47.5
 

 114,363
 N/M 
 47.5
Intangible asset amortization3,822
 8,010
 (52.3) 1.6
 4.0
2,615
 3,822
 (31.6) 1.2
 1.6
Back office conversion costs1,293
 
 N/M
 0.5
 

 1,293
 N/M 
 0.5
Other operating expenses2,290
 2,687
 (14.8) 1.0
 1.3
3,640
 2,290
 59.0
 1.7
 1.0
Total non-interest expenses322,803
 182,396
 77.0
 134.2
 90.8
187,893
 322,803
 (41.8) 86.4
 134.2
                  
Income/(loss) before income tax expense/(benefit)(82,236) 18,451
 N/M
 (34.2) 9.2
29,635
 (82,236) N/M 13.6
 (34.2)
                  
Income tax expense/(benefit)(31,423) 6,515
 N/M
 (13.1) 3.2
7,365
 (31,423) N/M 3.4
 (13.1)
                  
Net income/(loss)(50,813) 11,936
 N/M
 (21.1) 5.9
22,270
 (50,813) N/M 10.2
 (21.1)
                  
Net income/(loss) applicable to noncontrolling interests(1,100) 1,278
 N/M
 (0.5) 0.6
247
 (1,100) N/M 0.1
 (0.5)
                  
Net income/(loss) applicable to Piper Jaffray Companies$(49,713) $10,658
 N/M
 (20.7)% 5.3%$22,023
 $(49,713) N/M 10.1% (20.7)%
N/M – Not meaningful

For the three months ended September 30, 20172018, we recorded a net lossincome applicable to Piper Jaffray Companies of $49.7 million, driven by a $70.2 million, net of tax, goodwill impairment charge.$22.0 million. Net revenues for the three months ended September 30, 20172018 were $240.6$217.5 million, a 19.89.6 percent increasedecrease compared to $200.8$240.6 million in the year-ago period. In the third quarter of 20172018, investment banking revenues were $190.5$166.5 million, up 39.4down 12.6 percent compared with $136.7$190.5 million in the prior-year period, as higherlower advisory services revenues were partially offset by lowerhigher equity and debt financing revenues. For the three months ended September 30, 2018, institutional brokerage revenues decreased 9.0 percent to

4943


Table of Contents

September 30, 2017, institutional brokerage revenues decreased 17.3 percent to $34.9$31.7 million, compared with $42.2$34.9 million in the third quarter of 2016,2017, due to lower fixed income and equity institutional brokerage revenues. In the third quarter of 2017,2018, asset management fees of $12.8$13.4 million were down 16.0up 4.4 percent compared with $15.3$12.8 million in the third quarter of 2016 due primarily to2017 as higher management fees from our merchant banking funds were partially offset by lower management fees from both our master limited partnership ("MLP") and equity product offerings. For the three months ended September 30, 2017,2018, net interest income was $2.8$2.9 million, up slightly from $1.9$2.8 million in the prior-year period. InWe recorded investment income of $3.1 million in the thirdfirst quarter of 2017, we recorded an investment2018, compared with a loss of $0.4 million, compared with income of $4.8 million in the prior-year period. In the third quarter of 2016, we recorded gains on our investment and the noncontrolling interests in the merchant banking fund that we manage compared with losses in the current period. Non-interest expenses were $322.8$187.9 million for the three months ended September 30, 2017, up 77.02018, down 41.8 percent compared to $182.4$322.8 million in the prior-year period. The increase wasperiod, primarily due to thea $114.4 million non-cash goodwill impairment charge as well as higherrecorded in the third quarter of 2017. Additionally, in the third quarter of 2018, lower compensation expenses from increaseddecreased revenues and lower acquisition-related compensation costs were partially offset by $7.7 million of reimbursed deal-related expenses. New accounting guidance, effective in 2018, requires the gross presentation of client reimbursed deal expenses.

New Revenue Recognition Guidance

As discussed in Note 2 to our unaudited consolidated financial statements, we adopted new revenue recognition guidance effective as of January 1, 2018. The previous broker dealer industry treatment of netting deal expenses with investment banking revenues was superseded under the new guidance. As a result of adopting the new guidance, we now present investment banking revenues gross of related client reimbursed deal expenses and deal-related expenses as non-interest expenses on the consolidated statements of operations, rather than the previous presentation of netting deal expenses incurred for completed investment banking deals within revenues. This change did not impact net income, however the financial measures for the three months ended September 30, 2018 were impacted as follows:

Higher net revenues,
Decreased compensation ratio,
Higher non-compensation expenses,
Higher non-compensation ratio, and
Lower pre-tax operating margin.

Deal-related expenses are deferred until completion of an investment banking transaction and beginning in 2018 are reported separately on the consolidated statements of operations. For the three months ended September 30, 2018, we reported higher investment banking revenues and higher non-compensation expenses of $7.7 million, respectively, as a result of this change.

In addition, beginning in 2018, we defer the recognition of performance fees on our merchant banking, energy and senior living alternative asset management funds until such fees are no longer subject to reversal, which will cause a delay in the recognition of these fees as revenue. With the exception of the above, our previous methods of recognizing investment banking revenues were not significantly impacted by the new guidance.

Consolidated Non-Interest Expenses

Compensation and Benefits – Compensation and benefits expenses, which are the largest component of our expenses, include salaries, incentive compensation, benefits, stock-based compensation, employment taxes, income associated with the forfeiture of stock-based compensation and other employee-related costs. A portion of compensation expense is comprised of variable incentive arrangements, including discretionary incentive compensation, the amount of which fluctuates in proportion to the level of business activity, increasing with higher revenues and operating profits. Other compensation costs, primarily base salaries and benefits, are more fixed in nature. The timing of incentive compensation payments, which generally occur in February, has a greater impact on our cash position and liquidity than is reflected on our consolidated statements of operations. We have granted restricted stock with service conditions as a component of our acquisition deal consideration, which is amortized to compensation expense over the service period.

For the three months ended September 30, 20172018, compensation and benefits expenses increaseddecreased to $169.5$139.2 million, compared with $135.2$169.5 million in the corresponding period of 20162017, due to higherlower net revenues as well as higherand decreased acquisition-related compensation costs, primarily resulting fromwhich were driven by a decline in compensation expenses related to a Simmons & Company International ("Simmons") performance award plan implemented at the Simmonstime of acquisition. Compensation and benefits expenses as a percentage of net revenues was 64.0 percent in the third quarter of 2018, compared with 70.4 percent in the third quarter of 2017, compared with 67.3 percent2017. The decreased compensation ratio reflects lower acquisition-related compensation and the impact of presenting investment banking revenues gross of related client reimbursed deal expenses, as required by new accounting guidance. This change resulted in a 230 bps decrease to the compensation ratio in the third quartercurrent quarter.

44


Table of 2016. The increased compensation ratio was primarily attributable to higher acquisition-related compensation costs.Contents


Outside Services – Outside services expenses include securities processing expenses, outsourced technology functions, outside legal fees, fund expenses associated with our consolidated alternative asset management funds and other professional fees. Outside services expenses decreased 27.1increased 27.0 percent to $7.5$9.5 million in the third quarter of 2017,2018, compared with $10.3$7.5 million in the corresponding period of 2016.2017. Excluding the portion of expenses from non-controlled equity interests in our consolidated alternative asset management funds, outside services expenses decreased 21.4increased 10.2 percent due primarily to loweran increase in professional and legal fees duringpartially offset by a reduction in securities processing costs as there are services we no longer use following our migration to a fully disclosed clearing model in the current period resulting from strong market conditions which enabled us to complete a high percentagethird quarter of investment banking transactions whereby we can recover expenses. The year-ago period included incremental expenses related to our acquisition of Simmons.2017.

Occupancy and Equipment – For the three months ended September 30, 2017,2018, occupancy and equipment expenses decreased 7.0increased 10.3 percent to $8.1$9.0 million, compared with $8.7$8.1 million for the three months ended September 30, 2016.2017. The increase was primarily due to incremental occupancy costs related to transitioning to new office space in Houston, Texas.

Communications – Communication expenses include costs for telecommunication and data communication, primarily consisting of expenses for obtaining third party market data information. For the three months ended September 30, 2017,2018, communication expenses decreased 9.0 percentincreased to $7.1$7.6 million, compared with $7.8$7.1 million for the three months ended September 30, 2016.2017. The decreaseincrease was primarily due to lowerhigher market data services.

Marketing and Business Development – Marketing and business development expenses include travel and entertainment costs, advertising and third party marketing fees. For the three months ended September 30, 2017,2018, marketing and business development expenses decreased 12.4 percent towere $6.7 million, flat compared with $7.6 million in the corresponding period of 2016. The decline was attributable to lower2017.

Deal-Related Expenses – Deal-related expenses include costs we incurred over the course of a completed investment banking deal, which primarily consist of legal fees, offering expenses, and travel and entertainment costs. For the three months ended September 30, 2018, deal-related expenses driven by strong market conditions which enabledwere $7.7 million. Effective January 1, 2018, new revenue recognition guidance required us to completepresent deal expenses on a high percentagegross basis under non-interest expenses on the consolidated statements of operations, rather than netting deal expenses incurred for completed investment banking transactions wherebydeals within revenues. The amount of deal-related expenses for the year will principally be dependent on the level of deal activity and may vary from quarter to quarter as the recognition of deal-related costs typically coincides with the closing of a transaction. Based upon prior years' experience, we can recoverwould expect approximately $5.0 million to $8.0 million of quarterly deal-related expenses.
 
Trade Execution and Clearance – For the three months ended September 30, 2017,2018, trade execution and clearance expenses increased slightly to $2.1 million, compared withwere $2.0 million, inessentially flat compared with the corresponding period of 2016.2017.


50


Table of Contents

Goodwill Impairment– During the third quarter of 2017, we performed an interim goodwill impairment test, which resulted in a
non-cash goodwill impairment charge of $114.4 million related to the asset management reporting unit. The impairment charge resulted from declining profitability in 2017.

Intangible Asset Amortization – Intangible asset amortization includes the amortization of definite-lived intangible assets consisting of customer relationships and the Simmons trade name. For the three months ended September 30, 2017,2018, intangible asset amortization was $3.8$2.6 million, compared with $8.0$3.8 million in the corresponding period of 2016. In the third quarter of 2016, we recorded a measurement period adjustment to reflect the final fair value of Simmons intangible assets. Based on this final fair value, we recorded additional amortization of $2.3 million in the third quarter of 2016.2017.

Back Office Conversion Costs – In the third quarter of 2017, we migrated to a fully disclosed clearing model and are no longer self clearing. Back office conversion costs includeincluded costs incurred to transition to a fully disclosed clearing model, such as contract termination fees, vendor migration fees, professional fees, and severance benefits for impacted personnel. For the three months ended September 30, 2017, we incurred back office conversion costs of $1.3 million. We expect to incur additional back office conversion costs in the fourth quarter of 2017.

Other Operating Expenses – Other operating expenses include insurance costs, license and registration fees, expenses related to our charitable giving program and litigation-related expenses, which consist of the amounts we reserve and/or pay out related to legal and regulatory matters. Other operating expenses wereincreased to $3.6 million in the third quarter of 2018, compared with $2.3 million in the third quarter of 2017, compared with $2.7 million in the third quarter2017. The increase was primarily due to higher expense related to our charitable giving program.


45


Table of 2016.Contents

Income Taxes The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act reduced the corporate federal tax rate from 35 percent to 21 percent effective January 1, 2018.

For the three months ended September 30, 2018, our provision for income taxes was $7.4 million, which included a $0.4 million tax benefit related to stock-based compensation awards vesting at values greater than the grant price. Excluding the impact of this benefit, our effective tax rate was 26.2 percent.

For the three months ended September 30, 2017, our benefit from income taxes was $31.4 million as a result of pre-tax losses related to the $114.4 million non-cash goodwill impairment charge. Our effective tax rate, excluding noncontrolling interests, was 38.7 percent forIn the third quarter of 2017. For2017, we recorded a $0.3 million tax benefit related to stock-based compensation awards vesting at values greater than the three months ended September 30, 2016,grant price. Excluding the impact of this benefit, our provision for income taxes was $6.5 million equating to an effective tax rate excluding noncontrolling interests, of 37.9was 37.8 percent.

Segment Performance

We measure financial performance by business segment. Our two reportable segments are Capital Markets and Asset Management. We determined these segments based upon the nature of the financial products and services provided to customers and our management organization. Segment pre-tax operating income and segment pre-tax operating margin are used to evaluate and measure segment performance by our chief operating decision maker in deciding how to allocate resources and in assessing performance in relation to our competitors. Revenues and expenses directly associated with each respective segment are included in determining segment operating results. Revenues and expenses that are not directly attributable to a particular segment are allocated based upon our allocation methodologies, generally based on each segment’ssegment's respective net revenues, use of shared resources, headcount or other relevant measures.

Throughout this section, we have presented segment results on both a U.S. GAAP and non-GAAP basis. Management believes that presenting adjusted segment pre-tax operating income and adjusted segment pre-tax operating margin in conjunction with the U.S. GAAP measures provides a more meaningful basis for comparison of its operating results and underlying trends between periods, and enhances the overall understanding of our current financial performance by excluding certain items that may not be indicative of our core operating results. The non-GAAP segment results should be considered in addition to, not as a substitute for, the segment results prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP.

Adjusted segment pre-tax operating income and adjusted segment pre-tax operating margin exclude (1) revenues and expenses related to noncontrolling interests, (2) amortization of intangible assets related to acquisitions, (3) compensation and non-compensation expenses from acquisition-related agreements (4) restructuring and acquisition integration costs and (5)(4) goodwill impairment charges. For U.S. GAAP purposes, these items are included in each of their respective line items on the consolidated statements of operations.


5146


Table of Contents

Capital Markets

The following table sets forth the Capital Markets adjusted segment financial results and adjustments necessary to reconcile to our consolidated U.S. GAAP pre-tax operating income and pre-tax operating margin for the periods presented:
Three Months Ended September 30,Three Months Ended September 30,
2017 20162018 2017
  Adjustments (1)     Adjustments (1)    Adjustments (1)     Adjustments (1)  
Total Noncontrolling Other U.S. Total Noncontrolling Other U.S.Total Noncontrolling Other U.S. Total Noncontrolling Other U.S.
(Dollars in thousands)Adjusted Interests Adjustments GAAP Adjusted Interests Adjustments GAAPAdjusted Interests Adjustments GAAP Adjusted Interests Adjustments GAAP
Investment banking                              
Advisory services$113,540
 $
 $
 $113,540
 $146,816
 $
 $
 $146,816
Financing                              
Equities$22,117
 $
 $
 $22,117
 $30,479
 $
 $
 $30,479
32,188
 
 
 32,188
 22,117
 
 
 22,117
Debt21,687
 
 
 21,687
 30,898
 
 
 30,898
20,936
 
 
 20,936
 21,687
 
 
 21,687
Advisory services146,816
 
 
 146,816
 75,230
 
 
 75,230
Total investment banking190,620
 
 
 190,620
 136,607
 
 
 136,607
166,664
 
 
 166,664
 190,620
 
 
 190,620
                              
Institutional sales and trading                              
Equities18,410
 
 
 18,410
 20,492
 
 
 20,492
17,804
 
 
 17,804
 18,410
 
 
 18,410
Fixed income20,676
 
 
 20,676
 25,399
 413
 
 25,812
18,162
 
 
 18,162
 20,676
 
 
 20,676
Total institutional sales and trading39,086
 
 
 39,086
 45,891
 413
 
 46,304
35,966
 
 
 35,966
 39,086
 
 
 39,086
                              
Management and performance fees678
 
 
 678
 1,353
 
 
 1,353
1,806
 
 
 1,806
 678
 
 
 678
                              
Investment income/(loss)324
 (984) 
 (660) 3,039
 1,433
 
 4,472
1,290
 1,876
 
 3,166
 324
 (984) 
 (660)
                              
Long-term financing expenses(1,736) 
 
 (1,736) (2,253) 
 
 (2,253)(1,732) 
 
 (1,732) (1,736) 
 
 (1,736)
                              
Net revenues228,972
 (984) 
 227,988
 184,637
 1,846
 
 186,483
203,994
 1,876
 
 205,870
 228,972
 (984) 
 227,988
                              
Operating expenses179,269
 116
 17,024
 196,409
 154,378
 568
 14,799
 169,745
167,855
 1,629
 7,299
 176,783
 179,269
 116
 17,024
 196,409
                              
Segment pre-tax operating income$49,703
 $(1,100) $(17,024) $31,579
 $30,259
 $1,278
 $(14,799) $16,738
$36,139
 $247
 $(7,299) $29,087
 $49,703
 $(1,100) $(17,024) $31,579
                              
Segment pre-tax operating margin21.7%     13.9% 16.4%     9.0%17.7%     14.1% 21.7%     13.9%
(1)The following is a summary of the adjustments needed to reconcile our consolidated U.S. GAAP segment pre-tax operating income and segment pre-tax operating margin to the adjusted segment pre-tax operating income and adjusted segment pre-tax operating margin:
Noncontrolling interests – The impacts of consolidating noncontrolling interests in our alternative asset management funds are not included in adjusted segment pre-tax operating income and adjusted segment pre-tax operating margin.
Other adjustments – The following table sets forth the items not included in adjusted segment pre-tax operating income and adjusted segment pre-tax operating margin for the periods presented:
Three Months Ended September 30,Three Months Ended September 30,
(Dollars in thousands)2017 20162018 2017
Compensation from acquisition-related agreements$14,309
 $8,176
$5,914
 $14,309
Amortization of intangible assets related to acquisitions2,544
 6,623
1,214
 2,544
Non-compensation expenses from acquisition-related agreements171
 
171
 171
$17,024
 $14,799
$7,299
 $17,024

Capital Markets net revenues on a U.S. GAAP basis were $228.0$205.9 million for the three months ended September 30, 2017,2018, compared with $186.5$228.0 million in the prior-year period. For the three months ended September 30, 2017,2018, adjusted net revenues were $229.0$204.0 million, compared with $184.6$229.0 million in the third quarter of 2016.2017. The variance explanations for net revenues and adjusted net revenues are consistent on both a U.S. GAAP and non-GAAP basis.


5247


Table of Contents

Investment banking revenues comprise all of the revenues generated through equity and debt financing and advisory services activities, which includeincludes mergers and acquisitions, equity private placements, debt advisory, and municipal financial advisory transactions.transactions, as well as equity and debt financing activities. To assess the profitability of investment banking, we aggregate investment banking fees with the net interest income or expense associated with these activities.

In the third quarter of 2017,2018, investment banking revenues increased 39.5decreased 12.6 percent to $190.6$166.7 million, compared with $136.6$190.6 million in the corresponding period of the prior year. For the three months ended September 30, 2017,2018, advisory services revenues were $146.8$113.5 million, up 95.2down 22.7 percent compared to $75.2$146.8 million in the third quarter of 2016. The results reflect2017. We completed 45 transactions with an aggregate enterprise value of $8.5 billion in the continuationthird quarter of our strong performance over the past three quarters elevated by several large fees. We completed2018, compared with 43 transactions with an aggregate enterprise value of $11.3 billion in the third quarter of 2017, compared with 462017. Although the number of completed transactions with an aggregate enterprise value of $5.8 billionwas consistent year-over-year, our results in the thirdprior-year period were elevated by several large fees. From quarter to quarter, our advisory services revenues are impacted by the timing and the number and size of 2016.deals closing. For the three months ended September 30, 2017,2018, equity financing revenues were $22.1$32.2 million, down 27.4up 45.5 percent compared with $30.5$22.1 million in a strong prior-year period due to fewerthe third quarter of 2017, reflecting more completed and larger transactions which was partially offset byand higher revenue per transaction. During the third quarter of 2017,2018, we completed 1619 equity financings, raising $1.9$3.2 billion for our clients, compared with 2516 equity financings, raising $4.9$1.9 billion for our clients in the comparable year-ago period. Debt financing revenues for the three months ended September 30, 20172018 were $21.7$20.9 million, down 29.83.5 percent compared with $30.9$21.7 million in a strongthe year-ago period. TheMunicipal issuance volumes are down on a year-over-year basis as a decrease was due to ain refunding activity resulting from higher interest rates and tax law changes has only been partially offset by an increase in new money issuance volume. The decline in municipal market issuance volumes, driven by lower levels of refunding activity.refundings has had the most impact on our state and local government sector; however, revenues from our specialty sector practices have partially offset this decline. During the third quarter of 2017,2018, we completed 116 negotiated municipal issues with a total par value of $4.1 billion, compared with 139 negotiated municipal issues with a total par value of $3.4 billion, compared with 184 negotiated municipal issues with a total par value of $4.3 billion during the prior-year period.

Institutional sales and trading revenues comprise all of the revenues generated through trading activities, which consist of facilitating customer trades, executing competitive municipal underwritings and our strategic trading activities in municipal bonds mortgage-backed securities and U.S. government agency securities. To assess the profitability of institutional brokerage activities, we aggregate institutional brokerage revenues with the net interest income or expense associated with financing, economically hedging and holding long or short inventory positions. Our results may vary from quarter to quarter as a result of changes in trading margins, trading gains and losses, net interest spreads, trading volumes and the timing of transactions based on market opportunities.

For the three months ended September 30, 2017,2018, institutional brokerage revenues were $39.1$36.0 million, a decrease of 15.68.0 percent compared with $46.3$39.1 million in the prior-year period, due to lower equity and fixed income institutional brokerage revenues. Equity institutional brokerage revenues were $18.4$17.8 million in the third quarter of 2017,2018, down 10.23.3 percent compared with $20.5$18.4 million in the corresponding period of 2016. Historically low volatility resulted2017. The manner in lower trading volumeswhich market participants pay for trade execution and research services is in transition at a time when the third quarter of 2017.overall fee pool is shrinking. This dynamic has negatively impacted our equity institutional brokerage revenues. For the three months ended September 30, 2017,2018, fixed income institutional brokerage revenues were $20.7$18.2 million, down 19.912.2 percent compared with $25.8$20.7 million in the prior-year period. A decline in customer flow activity andperiod due to fewer trading opportunities dueopportunities. Market conditions remain challenging as low relative, but rising, interest rates and a flattening yield curve continue to the lack of volatility reduced our revenues.depress volumes and trading spreads.

Management and performance fees include the fees generated from our merchant banking, energy and senior living funds with outside investors. For the three months ended September 30, 20172018, management and performance fees were $0.7$1.8 million, compared with $1.4$0.7 million in the prior-year period. The increase was due to higher assets under management in our merchant banking funds.

Investment income/(loss) includes realized and unrealized gains and losses on investments, including amounts attributable to noncontrolling interests, in our merchant banking, energy and senior living funds, and other firm investments.funds. For the three months ended September 30, 2017,2018, investment lossincome was $0.7$3.2 million, compared with an investment incomeloss of $4.5$0.7 million in the corresponding period of 2016. In the third quarter of 2016, we2017. We recorded higher gains on thein our merchant banking fund that we manage compared with lossesfunds in the current period. Excluding the impact of noncontrolling interests, adjusted investment income was $0.3 million for the three months ended September 30, 2017.

Long-term financing expenses primarily represent interest paid on our senior notes. For the three months ended September 30, 20172018, and 2017, long-term financing expenses decreased towere $1.7 million, from $2.3 million in the prior-year period.respectively. We repaid the $50our $125 million of Class Afixed rate senior notes upon maturity on May 31, 2017.October 9, 2018.

Capital Markets segment pre-tax operating margin for the three months ended September 30, 20172018 was 13.914.1 percent, compared with 9.013.9 percent for the corresponding period of 2016. Pre-tax operating margin was higher in the third quarter of 20172017. Despite lower revenues compared to the prior-yearyear-ago period, segment pre-tax operating margin increased due to a lower non-compensation ratio driven by an increase in revenues, which was partially offset by higher acquisition-related costs.compensation. Adjusted segment pre-tax operating margin for the three months ended September 30, 2017 was 21.7 percent, compared with 16.4 percent for the corresponding period of 2016. Adjusted pre-tax operating margin was higher compared to the third quarter of 2016 due to operating leverage as a result of higher revenues. Adjusted net revenues increased

5348


Table of Contents

24.0three months ended September 30, 2018 was 17.7 percent, and adjustedcompared with 21.7 percent for the corresponding period of 2017. Adjusted segment pre-tax operating expenses increased 16.1 percentmargin decreased compared to the third quarter of 2016, reflecting operating leverage in the business.year-ago period due to lower revenues.

Asset Management

The following table sets forth the Asset Management segment financial results and adjustments necessary to reconcile to our consolidated U.S. GAAP pre-tax operating income and pre-tax operating margin for the periods presented:
Three Months Ended September 30,Three Months Ended September 30,
2017 20162018 2017
  Adjustments (1)     Adjustments (1)    Adjustments (1)     Adjustments (1)  
Total Noncontrolling Other U.S. Total Noncontrolling Other U.S.Total Noncontrolling Other U.S. Total Noncontrolling Other U.S.
(Dollars in thousands)Adjusted Interests Adjustments GAAP Adjusted Interests Adjustments GAAPAdjusted Interests Adjustments GAAP Adjusted Interests Adjustments GAAP
Management fees                              
MLP$6,681
 $
 $
 $6,681
 $6,844
 $
 $
 $6,844
Equity$5,296
 $
 $
 $5,296
 $6,750
 $
 $
 $6,750
4,890
 
 
 4,890
 5,296
 
 
 5,296
MLP6,844
 
 
 6,844
 7,153
 
 
 7,153
Total management fees12,140
 
 
 12,140
 13,903
 
 
 13,903
11,571
 
 
 11,571
 12,140
 
 
 12,140
                              
Performance fees                              
MLP
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Equity
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
MLP
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total performance fees
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
                              
Total management and performance fees12,140
 
 
 12,140
 13,903
 
 
 13,903
11,571
 
 
 11,571
 12,140
 
 
 12,140
                              
Investment income439
 
 
 439
 461
 
 
 461
87
 
 
 87
 439
 
 
 439
                              
Total net revenues12,579
 
 
 12,579
 14,364
 
 
 14,364
11,658
 
 
 11,658
 12,579
 
 
 12,579
                              
Operating expenses10,753
 
 115,641
 126,394
 11,264
 
 1,387
 12,651
9,709
 
 1,401
 11,110
 10,753
 
 115,641
 126,394
                              
Segment pre-tax operating income/(loss)$1,826
 $
 $(115,641) $(113,815) $3,100
 $
 $(1,387) $1,713
$1,949
 $
 $(1,401) $548
 $1,826
 $
 $(115,641) $(113,815)
                              
Segment pre-tax operating margin14.5%     (904.8)% 21.6%     11.9%16.7%     4.7% 14.5%     (904.8)%
               
Adjusted segment pre-tax operating margin excluding investment income (2)11.4%     
 19.0%     
(1)Other Adjustments – The following table sets forth the items not included in adjusted segment pre-tax operating income/(loss)income and adjusted segment pre-tax operating margin for the periods presented:
Three Months Ended September 30,Three Months Ended September 30,
(Dollars in thousands)2017 20162018 2017
Goodwill impairment$114,363
 $
$
 $114,363
Amortization of intangible assets related to acquisitions1,278
 1,387
1,401
 1,278
$115,641
 $1,387
$1,401
 $115,641
(2)Management believes that presenting adjusted segment pre-tax operating margin excluding investment income, a non-GAAP measure, provides the most meaningful basis for comparison of Asset Management operating results across periods.

Management and performance fee revenues comprise the revenues generated from management and investment advisory services performed for separately managed accounts, registered funds and partnerships. Client asset inflows and outflows and investment performance have a direct effect on management and performance fee revenues. Management fees are generally based on the level of AUMassets under management ("AUM") measured monthly or quarterly, and an increase or reduction in AUM, due to market price fluctuations or net client asset flows, will result in a corresponding increase or decrease in management fees. Fees vary with the type of assets managed and the vehicle in which they are managed. Performance fees are earned when the investment return on AUM exceeds certain benchmark targets or other performance targets over a specified measurement period. These performance fees are typically annual performance hurdles and recognized in the fourth quarter of the applicable year, or upon withdrawal of client assets. The level of performance fees earned can vary significantly from period to period and these fees may not necessarily be correlated to changes in total AUM. The majority of performance fees, if earned, are generally recorded in the fourth quarter of the applicable year or upon withdrawal of client assets. At September 30, 20172018, approximately fourfive percent of our AUM was eligible to earn performance fees.


54
49


Table of Contents


For the three months ended September 30, 2017,2018, management fees were $12.1$11.6 million, a decrease of 12.74.7 percent, compared with $13.9$12.1 million in the prior-year period, due primarily to lower management fees from both our MLP and equity product offerings. Management fees from our MLP strategies decreased slightly in the third quarter of 2018 to $6.7 million, compared with $6.8 million in the third quarter of 2017. In the third quarter of 2017,2018, management fees related to our equity strategies were $5.3$4.9 million, down 21.57.7 percent compared to $6.8$5.3 million in the corresponding period of 20162017, due to lower average AUM resulting from net client outflows, and a lower average effective revenue yield. The net client outflows were exacerbated by our efforts to remix our product offerings to a broader set of products and the lower yield resulted from changes in our product mix. The average effective revenue yield (total annualized management fees as a percentage of our average month-end AUM) for our equity strategies was 61declined to 56 basis points for the third quarter of 2017,2018, compared with 7061 basis points for the prior-year period. Management fees fromperiod, driven by the mix of our master limited partnership ("MLP") strategies decreased 4.3 percent in the third quarter of 2017 to $6.8 million, compared with $7.2 million in the third quarter of 2016 as lower average AUM was partially offset by a higher average effective revenue yield. Our average effective revenue yield for our MLP strategies was 66 basis points for the third quarter of 2017, compared with 64 basis points for the prior-year period.equity products.

Investment income includes gains and losses from our investments in registered funds and private funds or partnerships that we manage. For the three months ended September 30, 2017,2018, investment income was $0.4$0.1 million, compared with $0.5$0.4 million for the prior-year period.

Segment pre-tax operating margin for the three months ended September 30, 2018 was 4.7 percent. The negative segment pre-tax operating margin for the three months ended September 30, 2017 was due to the $114.4 million non-cash goodwill impairment charge. Excluding investment income on firm capital invested in our strategies, adjustedAdjusted segment pre-tax operating margin declinedimproved from 19.0 percent in the third quarter of 2016 to 11.414.5 percent in the third quarter of 2017 to 16.7 percent in the third quarter of 2018 due to lower management fees.initiatives to reduce operating expenses as market conditions remain challenging.

The following table summarizes the changes in our AUM for the periods presented:
     Twelve
 Three Months Ended Months Ended
 September 30, September 30,
(Dollars in millions)2017 2016 2017
Equity     
Beginning of period$4,276
 $3,681
 $3,878
Net outflows(862) (103) (784)
Net market appreciation171
 300
 491
End of period$3,585
 $3,878
 $3,585
      
MLP     
Beginning of period$4,304
 $4,410
 $4,551
Net outflows(210) (122) (333)
Net market appreciation/(depreciation)(51) 263
 (175)
End of period$4,043
 $4,551
 $4,043
      
Total     
Beginning of period$8,580
 $8,091
 $8,429
Net outflows(1,072) (225) (1,117)
Net market appreciation120
 563
 316
End of period$7,628
 $8,429
 $7,628

Total AUM was $7.6 billion at September 30, 2017. Equity AUM decreased to $3.6 billion at September 30, 2017 as net client outflows of $0.9 billion during the quarter were partially offset by net market appreciation of $0.2 billion. In the third quarter of 2017, we exited our Japan value product, which reduced our AUM by approximately $0.8 billion. The reduction from client outflows was partially offset by client inflows into our new global dividend strategy during the quarter. This product, which we added in the first quarter of 2017, is part of our strategy to remix our product offerings. MLP AUM decreased to $4.0 billion at September 30, 2017 as we experienced net client outflows of $0.2 billion during the quarter.
     Twelve
 Three Months Ended Months Ended
 September 30, September 30,
(Dollars in millions)2018 2017 2018
MLP     
Beginning of period$4,016
 $4,304
 $4,043
Net outflows(211) (210) (138)
Net market appreciation/(depreciation)184
 (51) 84
End of period$3,989
 $4,043
 $3,989
      
Equity     
Beginning of period$3,467
 $4,276
 $3,585
Net outflows(325) (862) (591)
Net market appreciation177
 171
 325
End of period$3,319
 $3,585
 $3,319
      
Total     
Beginning of period$7,483
 $8,580
 $7,628
Net outflows(536) (1,072) (729)
Net market appreciation361
 120
 409
End of period$7,308
 $7,628
 $7,308


5550


Table of Contents

Financial Summary for the nine months ended September 30, 20172018 and September 30, 20162017

The following table provides a summary of the results of our operations on a U.S. GAAP basis and the results of our operations as a percentage of net revenues for the periods indicated.
      As a Percentage of      As a Percentage of
      Net Revenues for the      Net Revenues for the
Nine Months Ended Nine Months EndedNine Months Ended Nine Months Ended
September 30, September 30,September 30, September 30,
    2017        2018    
(Dollars in thousands)2017 2016 v2016 2017 20162018 2017 v2017 2018 2017
Revenues:                  
Investment banking$461,260
 $338,034
 36.5 % 72.2 % 64.4%$411,203
 $461,260
 (10.9)% 73.4 % 72.2 %
Institutional brokerage111,083
 122,423
 (9.3) 17.4
 23.3
92,415
 111,083
 (16.8) 16.5
 17.4
Asset management44,011
 43,699
 0.7
 6.9
 8.3
38,706
 44,011
 (12.1) 6.9
 6.9
Interest22,649
 24,094
 (6.0) 3.5
 4.6
25,183
 22,649
 11.2
 4.5
 3.5
Investment income15,406
 14,019
 9.9
 2.4
 2.7
6,706
 15,406
 (56.5) 1.2
 2.4
Total revenues654,409
 542,269
 20.7
 102.4
 103.3
574,213
 654,409
 (12.3) 102.5
 102.4
                  
Interest expense15,568
 17,383
 (10.4) 2.4
 3.3
14,142
 15,568
 (9.2) 2.5
 2.4
                  
Net revenues638,841
 524,886
 21.7
 100.0
 100.0
560,071
 638,841
 (12.3) 100.0
 100.0
                  
Non-interest expenses:                  
Compensation and benefits438,161
 356,770
 22.8
 68.6
 68.0
369,895
 438,161
 (15.6) 66.0
 68.6
Outside services27,612
 28,923
 (4.5) 4.3
 5.5
29,024
 27,612
 5.1
 5.2
 4.3
Occupancy and equipment24,846
 25,311
 (1.8) 3.9
 4.8
26,476
 24,846
 6.6
 4.7
 3.9
Communications22,025
 22,469
 (2.0) 3.4
 4.3
24,112
 22,025
 9.5
 4.3
 3.4
Marketing and business development22,512
 23,804
 (5.4) 3.5
 4.5
21,702
 22,512
 (3.6) 3.9
 3.5
Deal-related expenses18,888
 
 N/M
 3.4
 
Trade execution and clearance5,864
 5,686
 3.1
 0.9
 1.1
6,240
 5,864
 6.4
 1.1
 0.9
Restructuring and integration costs
 10,206
 (100.0) 
 1.9
Restructuring costs3,770
 
 N/M
 0.7
 
Goodwill impairment114,363
 
 N/M
 17.9
 

 114,363
 N/M
 
 17.9
Intangible asset amortization11,466
 15,400
 (25.5) 1.8
 2.9
7,845
 11,466
 (31.6) 1.4
 1.8
Back office conversion costs3,027
 
 N/M
 0.5
 

 3,027
 N/M
 
 0.5
Other operating expenses8,525
 7,915
 7.7
 1.3
 1.5
9,187
 8,525
 7.8
 1.6
 1.3
Total non-interest expenses678,401
 496,484
 36.6
 106.2
 94.6
517,139
 678,401
 (23.8) 92.3
 106.2
                  
Income/(loss) before income tax expense/(benefit)(39,560) 28,402
 N/M
 (6.2) 5.4
42,932
 (39,560) N/M
 7.7
 (6.2)
                  
Income tax expense/(benefit)(26,912) 8,767
 N/M
 (4.2) 1.7
5,351
 (26,912) N/M
 1.0
 (4.2)
                  
Net income/(loss)(12,648) 19,635
 N/M
 (2.0) 3.7
37,581
 (12,648) N/M
 6.7
 (2.0)
                  
Net income applicable to noncontrolling interests3,217
 4,602
 (30.1) 0.5
 0.9
(1,271) 3,217
 N/M
 (0.2) 0.5
                  
Net income/(loss) applicable to Piper Jaffray Companies$(15,865) $15,033
 N/M
 (2.5)% 2.9%$38,852
 $(15,865) N/M
 6.9 % (2.5)%
N/M – Not meaningful

Except as discussed below, the description of non-interest expenseexpenses and net revenues as well as the underlying reasons for variances to prior year are substantially the same as the comparative quarterly discussion.


5651


Table of Contents

For the nine months ended September 30, 20172018, we recorded a net lossincome applicable to Piper Jaffray Companies of $15.9 million due to a $70.2 million, net of tax, goodwill impairment charge.$38.9 million. Net revenues for the nine months ended September 30, 20172018 were $638.8decreased 12.3 percent to $560.1 million, compared to $524.9with $638.8 million in the year-ago period. In the first nine months of 2017,2018, investment banking revenues were $461.3$411.2 million, up 36.5down 10.9 percent compared with $338.0$461.3 million in the prior-year period as higher advisory services and equity financing revenues were partiallymore than offset by lower advisory services and debt financing revenues. For the nine months ended September 30, 20172018, institutional brokerage revenues decreased 9.316.8 percent to $111.192.4 million, compared with $122.4111.1 million in the first nine months of 20162017, due to lower fixed income and equity institutional brokerage revenues. In the first nine months of 2017,2018, asset management fees were $44.038.7 million, up slightlydown 12.1 percent compared with $43.7$44.0 million in the first nine months of 2016, as higher2017, due to lower management fees from our MLP product offerings were offset by lower management fees from ourand equity product offerings. In the first nine months of 2017,2018, net interest income increased to $7.111.0 million, compared with $6.7$7.1 million in the prior-year period. The increase was due to higher interest income earned during the first quarter of 2018 on municipal securities as a result of higher average inventory balances. The increase was also attributable to lower costs of financing given our level of capital, as well as lower long-term financing expenses. We repaid $50 million of Class A senior notes upon maturity on May 31, 2017. For the nine months ended September 30, 2017,2018, investment income was $15.4$6.7 million, compared with $14.0$15.4 million in the prior-year period, due to higher gains on our investment and the noncontrolling interests in the merchant banking fund that we manage, as well as higher gains on our firm investments.period. Non-interest expenses were $678.4$517.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 20172018, up 36.6down 23.8 percent compared with $496.5$678.4 million in the year-ago period. The increase was driven byperiod, primarily due to the inclusion of a $114.4 million non-cash goodwill impairment charge. The increase was also due to highercharge in the third quarter of 2017. Also, for the nine months ended September 30, 2018, lower compensation expense resultingexpenses from increaseddecreased revenues as well as incrementaland lower acquisition-related costs related to our back office conversion. These increases were partially offset by lowerhigher restructuring costs.costs and deal-related expenses. As previously discussed, beginning in 2018, new accounting guidance requires the gross presentation of client reimbursed deal expenses.

Consolidated Non-Interest Expenses

RestructuringTrade Execution and Integration CostsClearanceFor the nine months ended September 30, 2016, we2018, trade execution and clearance expenses increased to $6.2 million, compared with $5.9 million for the corresponding period of 2017, due to higher trading execution expenses. As a result of migrating to a fully disclosed clearing model, securities processing expenses that were previously recorded restructuring and acquisition integration costs of $10.2 million primarily related to the acquisition of Simmons. The expenses consisted of $6.6 million of severance, benefits and outplacement costs, $1.3 million of vacated redundant leased office space, $1.3 million of transaction costs, and $1.0 million of contract termination costs.under Outside Services, are now reflected as trade execution charges.

Other Operating Expenses –Restructuring Costs Other operating expenses increased 7.7 percent to $8.5 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2017, compared with $7.9 million for– For the nine months ended September 30, 2016. The increase was primarily due to higher expense2018, we incurred restructuring costs of $3.8 million related to our charitable giving program driven by increased profitability, which was partially offset by decreased insurance costs. Additionally,brokerage and asset management businesses. Restructuring costs include $3.5 million of severance benefits, $0.1 million for vacated leased office space, and $0.2 million for contract termination fees. We do not anticipate incurring additional restructuring costs in the first nine months of 2017 we recorded foreign currency losses from our foreign cash accounts versus gains in the first nine months of 2016.2018.

Income Taxes The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act reduced the corporate federal tax rate from 35 percent to 21 percent effective January 1, 2018. SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 118, "Income Tax Accounting Implications of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act" ("SAB 118") permitted companies to report a provisional amount in the 2017 financial statements if the accounting for income tax effects of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act was incomplete as of December 31, 2017. This provisional amount would be subject to adjustment in subsequent periods during a defined measurement period. 

For the nine months ended September 30, 2017,2018, our benefit from income taxes was $26.9 million equating to an effective tax rate, excluding noncontrolling interests, of 62.9 percent, compared with a provision for income taxes was $5.4 million. In the first nine months of $8.82018, we recorded a $6.8 million intax benefit related to stock-based compensation awards vesting at values greater than the prior-year period equatinggrant price. Additionally, pursuant to SAB 118, we recorded an effectiveadditional $1.0 million of income tax rate, excluding noncontrolling interests, of 36.8 percent. The effective tax rateexpense for the nine months ended September 30, 2018 related to revaluing our deferred tax assets at the lower federal tax rate. Excluding the impact of these items, our effective tax rate was 26.2 percent for the nine months ended September 30, 2018.
For the nine months ended September 30, 2017, our benefit from income taxes was due$26.9 million as a result of pre-tax losses related to the impact$114.4 million non-cash goodwill impairment charge. In the first nine months of 2017, we recorded a $9.1 million tax benefit related to stock-based compensation awards vesting at values greater than the grant price in a period of pre-tax losses. As discussed in Note 2, "Accounting Policies and Pronouncements" in the notes to our unaudited consolidated financial statements included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, effective as of January 1, 2017, new accounting guidance requires us to recognize the income tax effects of stock-based compensation awards in the income statement when the awards vest, rather than as additional paid-in capital. The amount recognized in the income statement in future periods may vary depending upon, among other things, the number of restricted shares vesting and their change in value since the grant date. We would expect thatprice. Excluding the impact of this guidance will be more meaningful inbenefit, our effective tax rate was 45.1 percent for the first half of each year as the majority of our restricted stock vestings related to our employees' incentive compensation occurs in February.nine months ended September 30, 2017.



5752


Table of Contents

Segment Performance

Capital Markets

The following table sets forth the Capital Markets adjusted segment financial results and adjustments necessary to reconcile to our consolidated U.S. GAAP pre-tax operating income and pre-tax operating margin for the periods presented:
Nine Months Ended September 30,Nine Months Ended September 30,
2017 20162018 2017
  
Adjustments (1)
     
Adjustments (1)
    
Adjustments (1)
     
Adjustments (1)
  
Total Noncontrolling Other U.S. Total Noncontrolling Other U.S.Total Noncontrolling Other U.S. Total Noncontrolling Other U.S.
(Dollars in thousands)Adjusted Interests Adjustments GAAP Adjusted Interests Adjustments GAAPAdjusted Interests Adjustments GAAP Adjusted Interests Adjustments GAAP
Investment banking                              
Advisory services$266,083
 $
 $
 $266,083
 $332,205
 $
 $
 $332,205
Financing                              
Equities$70,229
 $
 $
 $70,229
 $53,831
 $
 $
 $53,831
99,868
 
 
 99,868
 70,229
 
 
 70,229
Debt60,066
 
 
 60,066
 80,195
 
 
 80,195
45,473
 
 
 45,473
 60,066
 
 
 60,066
Advisory services332,205
 
 
 332,205
 204,971
 
 
 204,971
Total investment banking462,500
 
 
 462,500
 338,997
 
 
 338,997
411,424
 
 
 411,424
 462,500
 
 
 462,500
                              
Institutional sales and trading                              
Equities59,085
 
 
 59,085
 62,773
 
 
 62,773
54,951
 
 
 54,951
 59,085
 
 
 59,085
Fixed income63,137
 
 
 63,137
 70,665
 1,153
 
 71,818
52,932
 
 
 52,932
 63,137
 
 
 63,137
Total institutional sales and trading122,222
 
 
 122,222
 133,438
 1,153
 
 134,591
107,883
 
 
 107,883
 122,222
 
 
 122,222
                              
Management and performance fees4,172
 
 
 4,172
 4,112
 
 
 4,112
4,824
 
 
 4,824
 4,172
 
 
 4,172
                              
Investment income10,275
 4,880
 
 15,155
 8,672
 5,337
 
 14,009
5,250
 2,357
 
 7,607
 10,275
 4,880
 
 15,155
                              
Long-term financing expenses(6,003) 
 
 (6,003) (6,838) 
 
 (6,838)(5,351) 
 
 (5,351) (6,003) 
 
 (6,003)
                              
Net revenues593,166
 4,880
 
 598,046
 478,381
 6,490
 
 484,871
524,030
 2,357
 
 526,387
 593,166
 4,880
 
 598,046
                              
Operating expenses484,677
 1,663
 38,362
 524,702
 415,760
 1,888
 42,980
 460,628
450,786
 3,628
 27,610
 482,024
 484,677
 1,663
 38,362
 524,702
                              
Segment pre-tax operating income$108,489
 $3,217
 $(38,362) $73,344
 $62,621
 $4,602
 $(42,980) $24,243
$73,244
 $(1,271) $(27,610) $44,363
 $108,489
 $3,217
 $(38,362) $73,344
                              
Segment pre-tax operating margin18.3%     12.3% 13.1%     5.0%14.0%     8.4% 18.3%     12.3%
(1)The following is a summary of the adjustments needed to reconcile our consolidated U.S. GAAP segment pre-tax operating income and segment pre-tax operating margin to the adjusted segment pre-tax operating income and adjusted segment pre-tax operating margin:
Noncontrolling interests – The impacts of consolidating noncontrolling interests in our alternative asset management funds are not included in adjusted segment pre-tax operating income and adjusted segment pre-tax operating margin.
Other adjustments – The following table sets forth the items not included in adjusted segment pre-tax operating income and adjusted segment pre-tax operating margin for the periods presented:
Nine Months Ended September 30,Nine Months Ended September 30,
(Dollars in thousands)2017 20162018 2017
Compensation from acquisition-related agreements$30,301
 $21,544
$23,455
 $30,301
Restructuring and integration costs
 10,197
Amortization of intangible assets related to acquisitions7,633
 11,239
3,643
 7,633
Non-compensation expenses from acquisition-related agreements428
 
512
 428
$38,362
 $42,980
$27,610
 $38,362

Capital Markets net revenues on a U.S. GAAP basis were $598.0$526.4 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2017,2018, compared with $484.9$598.0 million in the prior-year period. In the first nine months of 2017,2018, Capital Markets adjusted net revenues were $593.2$524.0 million, compared with $478.4$593.2 million in the first nine months of 2016.2017. The variance explanations for net revenues and adjusted net revenues are consistent on both a U.S. GAAP and non-GAAP basis.


5853


Table of Contents

In the first nine months of 2017,2018, investment banking revenues increased 36.4decreased 11.0 percent to $462.5$411.4 million, compared with $339.0$462.5 million in the corresponding period of the prior year. For the nine months ended September 30, 2017,2018, advisory services revenues increased 62.1decreased 19.9 percent to $332.2$266.1 million, compared with $205.0$332.2 million in the first nine months of 2016.2017. The increase reflectsdecrease was driven by lower revenue per transaction as our long-term efforts to grownumber of completed deals was consistent year-over-year. Additionally, our revenues in 2017 were elevated by several large fees. We completed 118 transactions with an aggregate enterprise value of $18.6 billion in the advisory services business and the diversity in our business. These factors have led to market share gains. We completedfirst nine months of 2018, compared with 118 transactions with an aggregate enterprise value of $27.8 billion in the first nine months of 2017, compared with 104 transactions with an aggregate enterprise value of $14.1 billion in the first nine months of 2016.2017. For the nine months ended September 30, 20172018, equity financing revenues were $70.2$99.9 million, up 30.5an increase of 42.2 percent compared with $53.8$70.2 million in the prior-year period, due to more completed transactions and higher revenue per transaction. The majority of our equity financing revenues are in the sub-$2 billion fee pool market. On a year-to-date basis, our revenues in this market were up approximately 20 percent, while the overallsub-$2 billion fee pool in our target market was up approximately 7511 percent, compared to the corresponding period of the prior year.reflecting market share gains. During the first nine months of 2017,2018, we completed 6070 equity financings, raising $12.0$13.3 billion for our clients, compared with 4860 equity financings, raising $9.7$12.0 billion for our clients in the year-ago period. Debt financing revenues for the nine months ended September 30, 20172018 were $60.1$45.5 million, down 25.124.3 percent compared with $80.2$60.1 million in the year-ago period, due to lower public finance revenues as refunding activitymunicipal market issuance volume has declined meaningfully compared to the prior-year periodperiod. The first quarter of 2018 experienced a significant decline in public finance issuance volume due to record issuance volume in the fourth quarter of 2017 as issuers accelerated financings before the implementation of federal tax law changes in 2018. Municipal issuance volume began to rebound in the second and third quarters of 2018, but it is still down on a year-over-year basis as the increase in new money issuance volumes have remained essentially flat.volume has not offset the decrease in refunding activity. During the first nine months of 2017,2018, we completed 297 negotiated municipal issues with a total par value of $8.1 billion, compared with 421 negotiated municipal issues with a total par value of $10.5 billion, compared with 512 negotiated municipal issues with a total par value of $11.6 billion during the prior-year period.

For the nine months ended September 30, 20172018, institutional brokerage revenues decreased 9.211.7 percent to $122.2$107.9 million, compared with $134.6$122.2 million in the prior-year period, due to lower equity and fixed income institutional brokerage revenues. Equity institutional brokerage revenues decreased 5.97.0 percent to $59.1$55.0 million in the first nine months of 20172018, compared with $62.8$59.1 million in the corresponding period of 20162017, due to lower client trading volumes.changes in how equity market participants pay for equity research and trade execution services at a time when the overall fee pool is shrinking. Global market participants are shifting trade execution to low-touch providers and paying for research services separately, a result of the MiFID II regulation that became effective in the European Union in 2018. For the nine months ended September 30, 2017,2018, fixed income institutional brokerage revenues were $63.1$52.9 million, down 12.116.2 percent compared with $71.8$63.1 million in the prior-year period, due to lower trading gains and a decline in customer flow activityactivity. Industry returns for municipal bonds in the first quarter of 2018 were the worst in nearly a decade, resulting in a decline in the value of municipal securities. Also, customer demand was muted due to the impact of federal tax reform on the municipal asset class. Unfavorable market conditions, exacerbated by low relative, but rising, interest rates and fewer opportunities fora flattening yield curve, continued into the second and third quarters of 2018 and resulted in limited trading gains.opportunities.

For the nine months ended September 30, 20172018, management and performance fees were $4.2$4.8 million, up compared with $4.1$4.2 million in the prior-year period.period, due to higher assets under management in our merchant banking funds. The increase was partially offset by lower performance fees. Upon adopting new revenue recognition guidance effective as of January 1, 2018, we now defer the recognition of performance fees on our merchant banking, energy and senior living funds until such fees are no longer subject to reversal, which will cause a delay in the recognition of these fees as revenue.

For the nine months ended September 30, 2017, investment income was $15.2 million, compared to $14.0 million in the corresponding period of 2016. In the first nine months of 2017, we recored higher gains in our merchant banking fund and on our other firm investments, which were partially offset by lower gains in our senior living fund. Excluding the impact of noncontrolling interests, adjusted investment income was $10.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2017.

For the nine months ended September 30, 20172018, long-term financing expenses decreased to $6.0$5.4 million, compared with $6.8$6.0 million in the prior-year period. We repaid the $50 million of Class A senior notes upon maturity on May 31, 2017. We expect further reductions in our long-term financing expenses as we repaid our $125 million Class C senior notes upon maturity on October 9, 2018.

Capital Markets segment pre-tax operating margin for the nine months ended September 30, 20172018 was 12.38.4 percent, compared with 5.012.3 percent for the corresponding period of 2016. The increased pre-tax operating margin was primarily due to a lower non-compensation ratio driven by higher revenues and lower levels of restructuring costs. In the year-ago period, we recorded $10.2 million of restructuring and integration costs primarily related to the acquisition of Simmons.2017. Adjusted segment pre-tax operating margin for the nine months ended September 30, 20172018 was 18.314.0 percent, compared with 13.118.3 percent for the corresponding period of 2016, primarily due2017. The decreased pre-tax operating margin for both U.S. GAAP and adjusted results was attributable to operating leveragelower revenues, as a result of higher revenues.well as incremental restructuring costs.


5954


Table of Contents

Asset Management

The following table sets forth the Asset Management segment financial results and adjustments necessary to reconcile to our consolidated U.S. GAAP pre-tax operating income and pre-tax operating margin for the periods presented:
Nine Months Ended September 30,Nine Months Ended September 30,
2017 20162018 2017
  
Adjustments (1)
     
Adjustments (1)
    
Adjustments (1)
     
Adjustments (1)
  
Total Noncontrolling Other U.S. Total Noncontrolling Other U.S.Total Noncontrolling Other U.S. Total Noncontrolling Other U.S.
(Dollars in thousands)Adjusted Interests Adjustments GAAP Adjusted Interests Adjustments GAAPAdjusted Interests Adjustments GAAP Adjusted Interests Adjustments GAAP
Management fees                              
MLP$19,328
 $
 $
 $19,328
 $21,361
 $
 $
 $21,361
Equity$18,478
 $
 $
 $18,478
 $21,051
 $
 $
 $21,051
14,546
 
 
 14,546
 18,478
 
 
 18,478
MLP21,361
 
 
 21,361
 18,536
 
 
 18,536
Total management fees39,839
 
 
 39,839
 39,587
 
 
 39,587
33,874
 
 
 33,874
 39,839
 
 
 39,839
                              
Performance fees                              
MLP
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Equity
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
8
 
 
 8
 
 
 
 
MLP
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total performance fees
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
8
 
 
 8
 
 
 
 
                              
Total management and performance fees39,839
 
 
 39,839
 39,587
 
 
 39,587
33,882
 
 
 33,882
 39,839
 
 
 39,839
                              
Investment income956
 
 
 956
 428
 
 
 428
Investment income/(loss)(198) 
 
 (198) 956
 
 
 956
                              
Total net revenues40,795
 
 
 40,795
 40,015
 
 
 40,015
33,684
 
 
 33,684
 40,795
 
 
 40,795
                              
Operating expenses35,503
 
 118,196
 153,699
 31,686
 
 4,170
 35,856
30,913
 
 4,202
 35,115
 35,503
 
 118,196
 153,699
                              
Segment pre-tax operating income/(loss)$5,292
 $
 $(118,196) $(112,904) $8,329
 $
 $(4,170) $4,159
$2,771
 $
 $(4,202) $(1,431) $5,292
 $
 $(118,196) $(112,904)
                              
Segment pre-tax operating margin13.0%     (276.8)% 20.8%     10.4%8.2%     (4.2)% 13.0%     (276.8)%
               
Adjusted segment pre-tax operating margin excluding investment income (2)10.9%     
 20.0%     
(1)Other Adjustments – The following table sets forth the items not included in adjusted segment pre-tax operating income/(loss)income and adjusted segment pre-tax operating margin for the periods presented:
Nine Months Ended September 30,Nine Months Ended September 30,
(Dollars in thousands)2017 20162018 2017
Restructuring and integration costs$
 $9
Goodwill impairment114,363
 
$
 $114,363
Amortization of intangible assets related to acquisitions3,833
 4,161
4,202
 3,833
$118,196
 $4,170
$4,202
 $118,196
(2)Management believes that presenting adjusted segment pre-tax operating margin excluding investment income, a non-GAAP measure, provides the most meaningful basis for comparison of Asset Management operating results across periods.

For the nine months ended September 30, 2017,2018, management fees were $39.8$33.9 million, essentially flata decrease of 15.0 percent compared with $39.6$39.8 million in the prior-year period as higherdue to lower management fees from both our MLP and equity product offerings. Management fees from our MLP product offerings were offset bystrategies decreased 9.5 percent in the first nine months of 2018 to $19.3 million, compared with $21.4 million in the first nine months of 2017, due to lower management fees from our equity product offerings.average AUM. In the first nine months of 20172018, management fees related to our equity strategies were $18.5$14.5 million, down 12.221.3 percent compared to $21.1$18.5 million in the corresponding period of 20162017, due to lower average AUM and a lower average effective revenue yield. The average effective revenue yield for our equity strategies was 56 basis points for the nine months ended September 30, 2018, down from 63 basis points for the nine months ended September 30, 2017, down from 71 basis points for the nine months ended September 30, 2016. Management fees from our MLP strategies increased 15.2 percent in the first nine months of 2017 to $21.4 million, compared with $18.5 million in the first nine months of 2016, due to higher average AUM.2017.

The negative segmentSegment pre-tax operating margin for the nine months ended September 30, 20172018 was a negative 4.2 percent due to declining profitability in the business. The negative segment pre-tax operating margin for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 was driven by the $114.4 million non-cash goodwill impairment charge. Excluding investment income on firm capital invested in our strategies, adjustedAdjusted segment operating margin declined from 20.0 percent in the first nine months of 2016 to 10.913.0 percent in the first nine months of 2017 due to higher compensation and non-compensation ratios.8.2 percent in the first nine months of 2018.


60
55


Table of Contents


The following table summarizes the changes in our AUM for the periods presented:
    Twelve    Twelve
Nine Months Ended Months EndedNine Months Ended Months Ended
September 30, September 30,September 30, September 30,
(Dollars in millions)2017 2016 20172018 2017 2018
MLP     
Beginning of period$3,790
 $4,616
 $4,043
Net inflows/(outflows)46
 (240) (138)
Net market appreciation/(depreciation)153
 (333) 84
End of period$3,989
 $4,043
 $3,989
     
Equity          
Beginning of period$4,115
 $4,954
 $3,878
$3,556
 $4,115
 $3,585
Net outflows(832) (1,379) (784)(420) (832) (591)
Net market appreciation302
 303
 491
183
 302
 325
End of period$3,585
 $3,878
 $3,585
     
MLP     
Beginning of period$4,616
 $3,924
 $4,551
Net outflows(240) (193) (333)
Net market appreciation/(depreciation)(333) 820
 (175)
End of period$4,043
 $4,551
 $4,043
$3,319
 $3,585
 $3,319
          
Total          
Beginning of period$8,731
 $8,878
 $8,429
$7,346
 $8,731
 $7,628
Net outflows(1,072) (1,572) (1,117)(374) (1,072) (729)
Net market appreciation/(depreciation)(31) 1,123
 316
336
 (31) 409
End of period$7,628
 $8,429
 $7,628
$7,308
 $7,628
 $7,308

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

Recent accounting pronouncements are set forth in Note 2 to our unaudited consolidated financial statements, and are incorporated herein by reference.

Critical Accounting Policies

Our accounting and reporting policies comply with U.S. GAAP and conform to practices within the securities industry. The preparation of financial statements in compliance with U.S. GAAP and industry practices requires us to make estimates and assumptions that could materially affect amounts reported in our consolidated financial statements. Critical accounting policies are those policies that we believe to be the most important to the portrayal of our financial condition and results of operations and that require us to make estimates that are difficult, subjective or complex. Most accounting policies are not considered by us to be critical accounting policies. Several factors are considered in determining whether or not a policy is critical, including whether the estimates are significant to the consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, the nature of the estimates, the ability to readily validate the estimates with other information (e.g., third party or independent sources), the sensitivity of the estimates to changes in economic conditions and whether alternative accounting methods may be used under U.S. GAAP.

We believe that of our significant accounting policies, the following are our critical accounting policies:

Valuation of Financial Instruments
Goodwill and Intangible Assets
Compensation Plans
Income Taxes

Our accounting policies related to goodwill and intangible assets are described below. See the "Critical Accounting Policies" section and Note 2, "Summary of Significant Accounting Policies" to our consolidated financial statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 20162017 for further information on our other critical accounting policies. See also Note 2, "Accounting Policies and Pronouncements" in the notes to our unaudited consolidated financial statements included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for changes to our significant accounting policies, as well as the impact from the adoption of new accounting standards.


61


Table of Contents

Goodwill and Intangible Assets

We record all assets and liabilities acquired in purchase acquisitions, including goodwill and other intangible assets, at fair value. Determining the fair value of assets and liabilities acquired requires certain management estimates. At September 30, 2017, we had goodwill of $81.9 million, all of which relates to our capital markets segment. At September 30, 2017, we had intangible assets of $25.8 million, of which $11.7 million relates to our capital markets segment and $14.1 million relates to our asset management segment.

We are required to perform impairment tests of our goodwill and indefinite-life intangible assets annually and on an interim basis when circumstances exist that could indicate possible impairment. We have elected to test for goodwill impairment in the fourth quarter of each calendar year. We have the option to first assess qualitative factors to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount. If, after making an assessment, we determine it is not more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount, then performing the two-step impairment test is unnecessary. However, if we conclude otherwise, then we are required to perform the two-step impairment test, which requires management to make judgments in determining what assumptions to use in the calculation. As discussed in Note 2, "Accounting Policies and Pronouncements" in the notes to our unaudited consolidated financial statements included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, we adopted new accounting guidance effective July 1, 2017 which eliminates the second step from the goodwill impairment test. Accordingly, we evaluate impairment charges based on the excess of a reporting unit’s carrying amount over its fair value. See Note 11 to our unaudited consolidated financial statements for additional information on our goodwill impairment testing.

The initial recognition of goodwill and other intangible assets and the subsequent quantitative impairment analysis involves significant judgment in determining the estimates of future cash flows, discount rates, economic forecast and other assumptions which are then used in acceptable valuation techniques, such as the market approach (earnings and/or transaction multiples) and/or the income approach (discounted cash flow method). Changes in these estimates and assumptions could have a significant impact on the fair value and any resulting impairment of goodwill. Our estimated cash flows, by their nature, are difficult to determine over an extended time period. Events and factors that may significantly affect the estimates include, among others, competitive forces and changes in revenue growth trends, cost structures, technology, and market conditions. To assess the reasonableness of cash flow estimates and validate assumptions used in our estimates, we review historical performance of the underlying assets or similar assets. In assessing the fair value of our reporting units, the volatile nature of the securities markets and our industry requires us to consider the business and market cycle and assess the stage of the cycle in estimating the timing and extent of future cash flows. In addition to discounted cash flows, we consider earnings multiples of comparable public companies and multiples of recent mergers and acquisitions transactions of similar businesses in our subsequent impairment analysis.

We identified impairment indicators in the third quarter of 2017 related to our asset management reporting unit and performed an interim goodwill impairment test as of July 31, 2017, which resulted in a non-cash goodwill impairment charge of $114.4 million. The impairment charge resulted from declining profitability in 2017 as decreases in revenues relating to higher fee product offerings have not been fully offset by new revenues on assets gained in lower fee product offerings. We believe the shift in revenue mix is attributable, in part, to the extended cycle of investors favoring passive investment vehicles over active management. The fair value of the asset management reporting unit was calculated using the income approach (discounted cash flow method based on revenue and EBITDA forecasts) and market approach (earnings multiples of comparable public companies), which are valuation techniques we believe market participants would use for the reporting unit.

We also evaluated the intangible assets (indefinite and definite-lived) related to the asset management reporting unit and concluded there was no impairment in the third quarter of 2017.

We anticipate completing our 20172018 annual goodwill and intangible asset impairment testing for the capital markets reporting unit in the fourth quarter of 2017.2018.


6256


Table of Contents

Liquidity, Funding and Capital Resources

Liquidity is of critical importance to us given the nature of our business. Insufficient liquidity resulting from adverse circumstances contributes to, and may be the cause of, financial institution failure. Accordingly, we regularly monitor our liquidity position and maintain a liquidity strategy designed to enable our business to continue to operate even under adverse circumstances, although there can be no assurance that our strategy will be successful under all circumstances.

The majority of our tangible assets consist of assets readily convertible into cash. Financial instruments and other inventory positions owned are stated at fair value and are generally readily marketable in most market conditions. Receivables and payables with brokers, dealers and clearing organizations usually settle within a few days. As part of our liquidity strategy, we emphasize diversification of funding sources to the extent possible while considering tenor and cost. Our assets are financed by our cash flows from operations, equity capital, and our funding arrangements. The fluctuations in cash flows from financing activities are directly related to daily operating activities from our various businesses. One of our most important risk management disciplines is our ability to manage the size and composition of our balance sheet. While our asset base changes due to client activity, market fluctuations and business opportunities, the size and composition of our balance sheet reflect our overall risk tolerance, our ability to access stable funding sources and the amount of equity capital we hold.

Certain market conditions can impact the liquidity of our inventory positions, requiring us to hold larger inventory positions for longer than expected or requiring us to take other actions that may adversely impact our results.

A significant component of our employees’employees' compensation is paid in annual discretionary incentive compensation. The timing of these incentive compensation payments, which generally are made in February, has a significant impact on our cash position and liquidity.

Beginning in 2017, we initiated the payment of a quarterly cash dividend to holders of our common stock.stock, which includes unvested restricted shares. Our board of directors also approved a dividend policy intended to return between 30 percent and 50 percent of our adjusted net income from the previous fiscal year to shareholders. This includes an annual special cash dividend, payable in the first quarter of each year. Our board of directors determines the declaration and payment of dividends on aan annual and quarterly basis, and is free to change our dividend policy at any time.

Our board of directors declared the following dividends:
Declaration Date Dividend Per Share
 Record Date Payment Date Dividend Per Share
 Record Date Payment Date
February 2, 2017 $0.3125
 February 20, 2017 March 13, 2017 $0.3125
 February 20, 2017 March 13, 2017
April 27, 2017 $0.3125
 May 26, 2017 June 15, 2017 $0.3125
 May 26, 2017 June 15, 2017
July 27, 2017 $0.3125
 August 28, 2017 September 15, 2017 $0.3125
 August 28, 2017 September 15, 2017
October 26, 2017 $0.3125
 November 29, 2017 December 15, 2017 $0.3125
 November 29, 2017 December 15, 2017
February 1, 2018 (1) $1.6200
 February 26, 2018 March 15, 2018
February 1, 2018 $0.3750
 February 26, 2018 March 15, 2018
April 27, 2018 $0.3750
 May 25, 2018 June 15, 2018
July 27, 2018 $0.3750
 August 24, 2018 September 14, 2018
October 26, 2018 $0.3750
 November 28, 2018 December 14, 2018
(1)Represents the annual special cash dividend based on fiscal year 2017 results.

Effective August 14, 2015, our board of directors authorized the repurchase of up to $150.0 million in common shares through September 30, 2017. During the nine months ended September 30, 2017, we repurchased 36,936 shares of our common stock at an average price of $67.62 per share for an aggregate purchase price of $2.5 million related to this authorization. This authorization expired on September 30, 2017.

On August 10, 2017, our board of directors authorized the repurchase of up to $150.0 million in common shares through September 30, 2019. The authorization became effective onDuring the nine months ended September 30, 2017.2018, we repurchased 124,606 shares of our common stock at an average price of $72.26 per share for an aggregate purchase price of $9.0 million related to this authorization. We have $141.0 million remaining under this authorization.

We also purchase shares of common stock from restricted stock award recipients upon the award vesting as recipients sell shares to meet their employment tax obligations. During the first nine months of 20172018, we purchased 308,801264,254 shares or $22.622.7 million of our common stock for this purpose.


6357


Table of Contents

Leverage

The following table presents total assets, adjusted assets, total shareholders’shareholders' equity and tangible shareholders’shareholders' equity with the resulting leverage ratios as of:
September 30, December 31,September 30, December 31,
(Dollars in thousands)2017 20162018 2017
Total assets$1,739,836
 $2,125,503
$1,493,436
 $2,024,683
Deduct: Goodwill and intangible assets(107,623) (233,452)(96,844) (104,689)
Deduct: Assets from noncontrolling interests(52,271) (109,179)(55,502) (54,917)
Adjusted assets$1,579,942
 $1,782,872
$1,341,090
 $1,865,077
      
Total shareholders' equity$786,785
 $816,266
$747,415
 $741,235
Deduct: Goodwill and intangible assets(107,623) (233,452)(96,844) (104,689)
Deduct: Noncontrolling interests(48,519) (57,016)(47,204) (47,903)
Tangible common shareholders' equity$630,643
 $525,798
$603,367
 $588,643
      
Leverage ratio (1)2.2
 2.6
2.0
 2.7
      
Adjusted leverage ratio (2)2.5
 3.4
2.2
 3.2
(1)
Leverage ratio equals total assets divided by total shareholders’shareholders' equity.
(2)
Adjusted leverage ratio equals adjusted assets divided by tangible common shareholders’shareholders' equity.

Adjusted assets and tangible common shareholders’shareholders' equity are non-GAAP financial measures. Goodwill and intangible assets are subtracted from total assets and total shareholders’shareholders' equity in determining adjusted assets and tangible common shareholders’shareholders' equity, respectively, as we believe that goodwill and intangible assets do not constitute operating assets which can be deployed in a liquid manner. Amounts attributed to noncontrolling interests are subtracted from total assets and total shareholders' equity in determining adjusted assets and tangible common shareholders' equity, respectively, as they represent assets and equity interests in consolidated entities that are not attributable, either directly or indirectly, to Piper Jaffray Companies. We view the resulting measure of adjusted leverage, also a non-GAAP financial measure, as a more relevant measure of financial risk when comparing financial services companies. Our adjusted leverage ratio decreased from December 31, 2016,2017 due to the $114.4 million non-cash goodwill impairment charge recorded for the asset management reporting unit, as well as reduced asset levels resulting from our migration to a fully disclosed clearing model.lower inventory balances.

Funding and Capital Resources

The primary goal of our funding activities is to ensure adequate funding over a wide range of market conditions. Given the mix of our business activities, funding requirements are fulfilled through a diversified range of short-term and long-term financing. We attempt to ensure that the tenor of our borrowing liabilities equals or exceeds the expected holding period of the assets being financed. Our ability to support increases in total assets is largely a function of our ability to obtain funding from external sources. Access to these external sources, as well as the cost of that financing, is dependent upon various factors, including market conditions, the general availability of credit and credit ratings. We currently do not have a credit rating, which could adversely affect our liquidity and competitive position by increasing our financing costs and limiting access to sources of liquidity that require a credit rating as a condition to providing the funds.

In the third quarter of 2017, we migrated to a fully disclosed clearing model and are no longer self clearing. Pershing LLC ("Pershing") is our clearing broker dealer. The conversion provided us with a new funding source through Pershing and, as a result, changed our mix of funding sources.


6458


Table of Contents

Our day-to-day funding and liquidity is obtained primarily through the use of our clearing arrangement with Pershing, commercial paper issuance, prime broker agreements, and bank lines of credit, and is typically collateralized by our securities inventory. These funding sources are critical to our ability to finance and hold inventory, which is a necessary part of our institutional brokerage business. The majority of our inventory is liquid and is therefore funded by short-term facilities. Certain of these short-term facilities (i.e., committed line and commercial paper) have been established to mitigate changes in the liquidity of our inventory based on changing market conditions. In the case of our committed line, it is available to us regardless of changes in market liquidity conditions through the end of its term, although there may be limitations on the type of securities available to pledge. Our commercial paper program helps mitigate changes in market liquidity conditions given it is not an overnight facility, but provides funding with a term of 27 to 270 days. Our funding sources are also dependent on the types of inventory that our counterparties are willing to accept as collateral and the number of counterparties available. Funding is generally obtained at rates based upon the federal funds rate or the London Interbank Offer Rate.

Pershing Clearing Arrangement – We have established an arrangement to obtain financing from Pershing related to the majority of our trading activities. Under our fully disclosed clearing agreement, the majority of our securities inventories and all of our customer activities are held by or cleared through Pershing. Financing under this arrangement is secured primarily by securities, and collateral limitations could reduce the amount of funding available under this arrangement. Our clearing arrangement activities are recorded net from trading activity and reported within receivables from or payables to brokers, dealers and clearing organizations. The funding is at the discretion of Pershing (i.e., uncommitted) and could be denied.denied without a notice period. Our fully disclosed clearing agreement includes a covenant requiring Piper Jaffray & Co. to maintain excess net capital of $120 million. At September 30, 2017,2018, we had $75.1 million ofno financing outstanding under this arrangement.

Commercial Paper Program – Our U.S. broker dealer subsidiary, Piper Jaffray & Co., issues secured commercial paper to fund a portion of its securities inventory. This commercial paper is currently issued under two separate programs, CP Series A and CP Series II A, and is secured by different inventory classes, which is reflected in the interest rate paid on the respective program. The programs can issue commercial paper with maturities of 27 to 270 days. CP Series II A includes a revised covenant that requires Piper Jaffray & Co. to maintain excess net capital of $100 million. During the third quarter of 2017, we retired the CP Series III A program, and increased the maximum amount that may be issued under CP Series II A from $150 million to $200 million. The following table provides information about our commercial paper programs at September 30, 20172018:
(Dollars in millions) CP Series A CP Series II A
Maximum amount that may be issued $300.0
 $200.0
Amount outstanding 
 

We resumed issuing commercial paper in the fourth quarter of 2017.
(Dollars in millions) CP Series A CP Series II A
Maximum amount that may be issued $300.0
 $200.0
Amount outstanding 
 50.0
     
Weighted average maturity, in days 
 10
Weighted average maturity at issuance, in days 
 34

Prime Broker Arrangements – We have established an arrangement to obtain overnight financing by a single prime broker related to certain strategic trading activities in municipal securities. We completed the liquidation of the municipal securities inventories associated with these strategic trading activities in the third quarter of 2018, and have closed this prime broker arrangement as we no longer have a need for the funding source. Financing under this arrangement was secured primarily by municipal securities, and collateral limitations could have reduced the amount of funding available. The funding was at the discretion of the prime broker and could have been denied subject to a notice period. Our prime broker financing activities were recorded net of receivables from trading activity.

Additionally, we have established a second overnight financing arrangement with another broker dealer related to our convertible securities inventories. Financing under these arrangementsthis arrangement is secured primarily by convertible securities, and collateral limitations could reduce the amount of funding available under these arrangements. Our prime broker financing activities are recorded net of receivables from trading activity.available. The funding is at the discretion of the prime brokersbroker and could be denied subject to a notice period. This arrangement is reported within receivables from or payables to brokers, dealers and clearing organizations, net of trading activity. At September 30, 20172018, we had $76.8$96.9 million of financing outstanding under thesethis prime broker arrangements.arrangement.

Committed LinesWe elected to decrease ourOur committed line from $250 million tois a one-year $200 million revolving secured credit facility in 2016 based on our liquidity needs and our back office conversion, completed in the third quarter of 2017, which provided us with an additional funding source from our clearing broker Pershing.facility. We use our committed credit facility in the ordinary course of business to fund a portion of our daily operations, and the amount borrowed under the facility varies daily based on our funding needs. Advances under this facility are secured by certain marketable securities. The facility includes a covenant that requires Piper Jaffray & Co. to maintain minimum net capital of $120 million, and the unpaid principal amount of all advances under the facility will be due on December 16, 2017.14, 2018. This credit facility has been in place since 2008 and we anticipate being able to renew the facility for another one-year term in the fourth quarter of 2017.2018. At September 30, 20172018, we had no advances against this line of credit.


6559


Table of Contents

Uncommitted Line – We use this uncommitted line in the ordinary course of business to fund a portion of our daily operations, and the amount borrowed under our uncommitted line varies daily based on our funding needs. Our $85 million uncommitted secured line is dependent on having appropriate collateral, as determined by the bank agreement, to secure an advance under the line. Collateral limitations could reduce the amount of funding available under this secured line. Our uncommitted line is discretionary and is not a commitment by the bank to provide an advance under the line. More specifically, the line is subject to approval by the bank each time an advance is requested and advances may be denied, which may be particularly true during times of market stress or market perceptions of our exposures. We manage our relationship with the bank that provides this uncommitted facility in order to have appropriate levels of funding for our business. At September 30, 20172018, we had no advances against this line of credit.

The following tables present the average balances outstanding for our various funding sources by quarter for 20172018 and 20162017, respectively.
 Average Balance for the Three Months Ended
(Dollars in millions)Sept. 30, 2017 June 30, 2017 Mar. 31, 2017
Funding source:     
Pershing clearing arrangement$42.5
 $
 $
Commercial paper30.3
 117.1
 137.7
Prime broker arrangements87.7
 103.7
 127.2
Short-term bank loans6.0
 67.1
 2.5
Total$166.5
 $287.9
 $267.4
Average Balance for the Three Months Ended Average Balance for the Three Months Ended
(Dollars in millions)Dec. 31, 2016 Sept. 30, 2016 June 30, 2016 Mar. 31, 2016 Sept. 30, 2018 June 30, 2018 Mar. 31, 2018
Funding source:             
Repurchase agreements$3.5
 $14.8
 $28.9
 $30.5
Pershing clearing arrangement $0.4
 $90.0
 $47.1
Commercial paper165.8
 235.8
 279.7
 279.2
 50.0
 50.0
 50.0
Prime broker arrangements225.6
 200.6
 169.2
 159.0
 112.4
 218.8
 336.5
Short-term bank loans5.3
 
 6.4
 0.8
 
 
 
Total$400.2
 $451.2
 $484.2
 $469.5
 $162.8
 $358.8
 $433.6
 Average Balance for the Three Months Ended
(Dollars in millions)Dec. 31, 2017 Sept. 30, 2017 June 30, 2017 Mar. 31, 2017
Funding source:       
Pershing clearing arrangement$20.6
 $26.3
 $
 $
Commercial paper49.5
 30.3
 117.1
 137.7
Prime broker arrangements221.1
 175.2
 192.6
 204.9
Short-term bank loans
 6.0
 67.1
 2.5
Total$291.2
 $237.8
 $376.8
 $345.1

The average funding in the third quarter of 20172018 decreased to $166.5$162.8 million, compared with $287.9$358.8 million during the second quarter of 2018, driven by the liquidation of our remaining municipal securities inventories associated with certain strategic trading activities, which were previously financed through one of our prime broker arrangements. Average funding declined compared to the corresponding period of 2017 due to a decrease in averagelower inventory balances and the accumulation of cash from operations. Average funding decreased compared to the corresponding period of 2016 as we used cash from operations to reduce funding.

The following table presents the maximum daily funding amount by quarter for 20172018 and 2016,2017, respectively.
(Dollars in millions) 2017 2016 2018 2017
First Quarter $543.4
 $576.4
 $613.1
 $543.4
Second Quarter $538.3
 $669.7
 $505.0
 $538.3
Third Quarter $418.7
 $525.6
 $263.5
 $418.7
Fourth Quarter 
 $445.9
   $569.9

Senior Notes

We have entered into variable and fixed rate senior notes with certain entities advised by Pacific Investment Management Company ("PIMCO"). The following table presents theAt September 30, 2018, we carried an outstanding senior notes balance by note class:
 Outstanding Balance
 September 30, December 31,
(Dollars in thousands)2017 2016
Class A Notes$
 $50,000
Class C Notes125,000
 125,000
Total senior notes$125,000
 $175,000


66


Table of Contents
$125.0 million.

On October 8, 2015, we entered into a second amended and restated note purchase agreement ("Second Amended and Restated Note Purchase Agreement") under which we issued $125 million of fixed rate Class C Notes. The Class C Notes bear interest at an annual fixed rate of 5.06 percent, are payable semi-annually and maturematured on October 9, 2018. The unpaid principal amount iswas due in full on the maturity date and may not be prepaid.date. The $50 million of variable rate Class A Notes issued in 2014 were repaid in full on the May 31, 2017 maturity date.


60


Table of Contents

The Second Amended and Restated Note Purchase Agreement includes customary events of default and covenants that, among other things, require us to maintain a minimum consolidated tangible net worth and minimum regulatory net capital, limit our leverage ratio and require maintenance of a minimum ratio of operating cash flow to fixed charges. At September 30, 2017,2018, we were in compliance with all covenants.

The $125 million of fixed rate Class C Notes issued in 2015 were repaid in full on the October 9, 2018 maturity date. Given our level of capital and strong cash generation from earnings, we decided not to renew our long-term borrowings.

Contractual Obligations

Our contractual obligations have not materially changed from those reported in Part II, Item 7 of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016,2017, except for our purchase commitments.operating lease obligations. On June 30, 2017,April 3, 2018, we entered into ana new lease agreement to move all offor our self clearing broker dealer operations to a fully disclosed clearing model with Pershing.Houston, Texas office location.

Remainder of 2018 2020 2022 and  Remainder of 2019 2021 2023 and  
(Dollars in millions)2017  - 2019  - 2021 thereafter Total2018 -2020 -2022 thereafter Total
Purchase commitments$8.4
 $21.5
 $6.7
 $18.7
 $55.3
Operating lease obligations$3.6
 $27.3
 $17.3
 $22.9
 $71.1

PurchaseNew Leases Guidance

As discussed in Note 2 to our unaudited consolidated financial statements, we will adopt new accounting guidance related to leases effective as of January 1, 2019. The guidance requires lessees to recognize all leases, including operating leases, with a term greater than 12 months on the statements of financial position. As of September 30, 2018, we had approximately 65 operating leases for office space with aggregate minimum lease commitments include agreements to purchase goods or services that are enforceable and legally binding and that specify all significant terms, including fixed or minimum quantities to be purchased, fixed, minimum or variable price provisions, and the approximate timingof $71.1 million. Upon adoption of the transaction. Purchasenew guidance, lease commitments with variable pricing provisions are included in the table basedwill be reflected on the minimum contractual amounts. Certain purchase commitments contain termination or renewal provisions.our statement of financial condition as a right-of-use asset and a lease commitment liability. The table reflects the minimum contractual amounts likelynew guidance is not expected to be paid under these agreements assuming the contracts are not terminated.materially impact Piper Jaffray & Co.'s net capital position.

Capital Requirements

As a registered broker dealer and member firm of the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc. ("FINRA"), Piper Jaffray & Co., our U.S. broker dealer subsidiary, is subject to the uniform net capital rule of the SEC and the net capital rule of FINRA. We have elected to use the alternative method permitted by the uniform net capital rule which requires that we maintain minimum net capital of $1.0 million. Advances to affiliates, repayment of subordinated liabilities, dividend payments and other equity withdrawals are subject to certain approvals, notifications and other provisions of the uniform net capital rules. We expect that these provisions will not impact our ability to meet current and future obligations. At September 30, 20172018, our net capital under the SEC’sSEC's uniform net capital rule was $215.5$199.1 million, and exceeded the minimum net capital required under the SEC rule by $214.5$198.1 million.

Although we operate with a level of net capital substantially greater than the minimum thresholds established by FINRA and the SEC, a substantial reduction of our capital would curtail many of our Capital Markets revenue producing activities.

Our committed short-term credit facility and our senior notes with PIMCO include covenants requiring Piper Jaffray & Co. to maintain minimum net capital of $120 million. Secured commercial paper issued under CP Series II A includes a covenant that requires Piper Jaffray & Co. to maintain excess net capital of $100 million. Our fully disclosed clearing agreement with Pershing also includes a covenant requiring Piper Jaffray & Co. to maintain excess net capital of $120 million.

At September 30, 2017,2018, Piper Jaffray Ltd., our broker dealer subsidiary registered in the United Kingdom, was subject to, and was in compliance with, the capital requirements of the Prudential Regulation Authority and the Financial Conduct Authority pursuant to the Financial Services Act of 2012.

Piper Jaffray Hong Kong Limited is licensed by the Hong Kong Securities and Futures Commission, which is subject to the liquid capital requirements of the Securities and Futures (Financial Resources) Rule promulgated under the Securities and Futures Ordinance. At September 30, 2017,2018, Piper Jaffray Hong Kong Limited was in compliance with the liquid capital requirements of the Hong Kong Securities and Trade Commission.


6761


Table of Contents

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

In the ordinary course of business we enter into various types of off-balance sheet arrangements. The following table summarizes the notional contract value of our off-balance sheet arrangements for the periods presented:
Expiration Per Period at December 31, Total Contractual AmountExpiration Per Period at December 31, Total Contractual Amount

     2020 2022   September 30, December 31,
     2021 2023   September 30, December 31,
(Dollars in thousands)2017 2018 2019 - 2021 - 2023 Later 2017 20162018 2019 2020 - 2022 - 2024 Later 2018 2017
Customer matched-book derivative contracts (1) (2)$22,100
 $
 $32,850
 $42,360
 $143,460
 $2,937,955
 $3,178,725
 $3,330,207
$
 $31,050
 $23,450
 $50,450
 $160,050
 $2,337,498
 $2,602,498
 $2,819,006
Trading securities derivative contracts (2)301,100
 26,000
 
 
 
 18,750
 345,850
 423,550
224,300
 9,500
 
 
 
 9,375
 243,175
 399,450
Credit default swap index contracts (2)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 7,470
Equity option derivative contracts (2)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 9,635
Investment commitments (3)
 
 
 
 
 
 40,905
 22,776

 
 
 
 
 
 80,629
 72,467
(1)
Consists of interest rate swaps. We have minimal market risk related to these matched-book derivative contracts; however, we do have counterparty risk with one major financial institution, which is mitigated by collateral deposits. In addition, we have a limited number of counterparties (contractual amount of $181.8178.6 million at September 30, 20172018) who are not required to post collateral. The uncollateralized amounts, representing the fair value of the derivative contracts, expose us to the credit risk of these counterparties. At September 30, 20172018, we had $20.813.5 million of credit exposure with these counterparties, including $15.410.8 million of credit exposure with one counterparty.
(2)
We believe the fair value of these derivative contracts is a more relevant measure of the obligations because we believe the notional or contract amount overstates the expected payout. At September 30, 20172018 and December 31, 20162017, the net fair value of these derivative contracts approximated $16.99.2 million and $24.0$20.5 million, respectively.
(3)
The investment commitments have no specified call dates. The timing of capital calls is based on market conditions and investment opportunities.

Derivatives

Derivatives’Derivatives' notional or contract amounts are not reflected as assets or liabilities on our consolidated statements of financial condition. Rather, the fair value of the derivative transactions are reported on the consolidated statements of financial condition as assets or liabilities in financial instruments and other inventory positions owned and financial instruments and other inventory positions sold, but not yet purchased, as applicable. For a complete discussion of our activities related to derivative products, see Note 4,3, "Financial Instruments and Other Inventory Positions Owned and Financial Instruments and Other Inventory Positions Sold, but Not Yet Purchased," in the notes to our unaudited consolidated financial statements.

Investment Commitments

We have investments, including those made as part of our merchant banking activities, in various limited partnerships or limited liability companies that provide financing or make investments in private equity companies. We commit capital and/or act as the managing partner of these entities.

We have committed capital of $80.6 million to certain entities and these commitments generally have no specified call dates. We had $40.9 million of commitments outstanding at September 30, 2017, of which $33.3 million relate to affiliated merchant banking funds and $2.0 million relate to an affiliated fund, which provides financing for senior living facilities.


6862


Table of Contents

Risk Management

Risk is an inherent part of our business. The principal risks we face in operating our business include: strategic risk, market risk, liquidity risk, credit risk, operational risk, human capital risk, and legal and regulatory risks. The extent to which we properly identify and effectively manage each of these risks is critical to our financial condition and profitability. We have a formal risk management process to identify, assess and monitor each risk and mitigating controls in accordance with defined policies and procedures. The risk management functions are independent of our business lines. Our management takes an active role in the risk management process, and the results are reported to senior management and the Board of Directors.

The audit committee of the Board of Directors oversees management’smanagement's processes for identifying and evaluating our major risks, and the policies, procedures and practices employed by management to govern its risk assessment and risk management processes. The nominating and governance committee of the Board of Directors oversees the Board of Directors’Directors' committee structures and functions as they relate to the various committees’committees' responsibilities with respect to oversight of our major risk exposures. With respect to these major risk exposures, the audit committee is responsible for overseeing management’smanagement's monitoring and control of our major risk exposures relating to market risk, credit risk, liquidity risk, legal and regulatory risk, operational risk (including cybersecurity), and human capital risk relating to misconduct, fraud, and legal and compliance matters. Our compensation committee is responsible for overseeing management’smanagement's monitoring and control of our major risk exposures relating to compensation, organizational structure, and succession. Our Board of Directors is responsible for overseeing management’smanagement's monitoring and control of our major risk exposures related to our corporate strategy. Our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer and Senior Vice President of Finance meet with the audit committee on a quarterly basis to discuss our market, liquidity, and legal and regulatory risks, and provide updates to the Board of Directors, audit committee, and compensation committee concerning the other major risk exposures on a regular basis.

We use internal committees to assist in governing risk and ensure that our business activities are properly assessed, monitored and managed. Our financial risk committees manage our market, liquidity and credit risks, and oversee risk management practices related to these risks, including defining acceptable risk tolerances and approving risk management policies. Membership is comprised of senior leadership, including but not limited to, our Chief Executive Officer, President, Chief Financial Officer, Senior Vice President of Finance, General Counsel, Treasurer, Head of Market and Credit Risk, Head of Public Finance and Head of Fixed Income Services and Firm Investments and Trading, and Head of Equities.Trading. Other committees that help evaluate and monitor risk include underwriting, leadership team and operating committees. These committees help manage risk by ensuring that business activities are properly managed and within a defined scope of activity. Our valuation committee, comprised of members of senior management and risk management, provide oversight and overall responsibility for the internal control processes and procedures related to fair value measurements. Additionally, our operational risk committees address and monitor risk related to information systems and security, legal, regulatory and compliance matters, and third parties such as vendors and service providers.

With respect to market risk and credit risk, the cornerstone of our risk management process is daily communication among traders, trading department management and senior management concerning our inventory positions, including those associated with our strategic trading activities, and overall risk profile. Our risk management functions supplement this communication process by providing their independent perspectives on our market and credit risk profile on a daily basis. The broader objectives of our risk management functions are to understand the risk profile of each trading area, to consolidate risk monitoring company-wide, to assist in implementing effective hedging strategies, to articulate large trading or position risks to senior management, and to ensure accurate fair values of our financial instruments.

Risk management techniques, processes and strategies may not be fully effective in mitigating our risk exposure in all market environments or against all types of risk, and any risk management failures could expose us to material unanticipated losses.

Strategic Risk

Strategic risk represents the risk associated with executive management failing to develop and execute on the appropriate strategic vision which demonstrates a commitment to our culture, leverages our core competencies, appropriately responds to external factors in the marketplace, and is in the best interests of our clients, employees and shareholders.

Our leadership team is responsible for managing our strategic risks. The Board of Directors oversees the leadership team in setting and executing our strategic plan.


6963


Table of Contents

Market Risk

Market risk represents the risk of losses, or financial volatility that may result from the change in value of a financial instrument due to fluctuations in its market price. Our exposure to market risk is directly related to our role as a financial intermediary for our clients, to our market-making activities and our strategic trading activities. Market risks are inherent to both cash and derivative financial instruments. The scope of our market risk management policies and procedures includes all market-sensitive financial instruments.

Our different types of market risk include:

Interest Rate Risk — Interest rate risk represents the potential volatility from changes in market interest rates. We are exposed to interest rate risk arising from changes in the level and volatility of interest rates, changes in the slope of the yield curve, changes in credit spreads, and the rate of prepayments on our interest-earning assets (e.g., inventories) and our funding sources (e.g., short-term financing) which finance these assets. Interest rate risk is managed by selling short U.S. government securities, agency securities, corporate debt securities and derivative contracts. See Note 43 of our accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements for additional information on our derivative contracts. Our interest rate hedging strategies may not work in all market environments and as a result may not be effective in mitigating interest rate risk. Also, we establish limits on the notional level of our fixed income securities inventory and manage net positions within those limits.

Equity Price Risk — Equity price risk represents the potential loss in value due to adverse changes in the level or volatility of equity prices. We are exposed to equity price risk through our trading activities in the U.S. market. We attempt to reduce the risk of loss inherent in our market-making and in our inventory of equity securities by establishing limits on the notional level of our inventory and by managing net position levels within those limits.

Foreign Exchange Risk — Foreign exchange risk represents the potential volatility to earnings or capital arising from movement in foreign exchange rates. A modest portion of our business is conducted in currencies other than the U.S. dollar, and changes in foreign exchange rates relative to the U.S. dollar can therefore affect the value of non-U.S. dollar net assets, revenues and expenses. A change in the foreign currency rates could create either a foreign currency transaction gain/loss (recorded in our consolidated statements of operations) or a foreign currency translation adjustment (recorded to accumulated other comprehensive income/ (loss) within the shareholders’equityshareholders' equity section of our consolidated statements of financial condition and other comprehensive income/ (loss) within the consolidated statements of comprehensive income).

Value-at-Risk ("VaR")

We use the statistical technique known as VaR to measure, monitor and review the market risk exposures in our trading portfolios. VaR is the potential loss in value of our trading positions, excluding noncontrolling interests, due to adverse market movements over a defined time horizon with a specified confidence level. We perform a daily VaR analysis on substantially all of our trading positions, including fixed income, equities, convertible bonds, mortgage-backed securities and all associated economic hedges. These positions encompass both customer-related and strategic trading activities. A VaR model provides a common metric for assessing market risk across business lines and products. Changes in VaR between reporting periods are generally due to changes in levels of risk exposure, volatilities and/or correlations among asset classes and individual securities.

We use a Monte Carlo simulation methodology for VaR calculations. We believe this methodology provides VaR results that properly reflect the risk profile of all our instruments, including those that contain optionality, and also accurately models correlation movements among all of our asset classes. In addition, it provides improved tail results as there are no assumptions of distribution, and can provide additional insight for scenario shock analysis.

Model-based VaR derived from simulation has inherent limitations including: reliance on historical data to predict future market risk; VaR calculated using a one-day time horizon does not fully capture the market risk of positions that cannot be liquidated or offset with hedges within one day; and published VaR results reflect past trading positions while future risk depends on future positions.

The modeling of the market risk characteristics of our trading positions involves a number of assumptions and approximations. While we believe that these assumptions and approximations are reasonable, different assumptions and approximations could produce materially different VaR estimates. When comparing our VaR numbers to those of other firms, it is important to remember that different methodologies, assumptions and approximations could produce significantly different results.


7064


Table of Contents

The following table quantifies the model-based VaR simulated for each component of market risk for the periods presented, which are computed using the past 250 days of historical data. When calculating VaR we use a 95 percent confidence level and a one-day time horizon. This means that, over time, there is a one in 20 chance that daily trading net revenues will fall below the expected daily trading net revenues by an amount at least as large as the reported VaR. Shortfalls on a single day can exceed reported VaR by significant amounts. Shortfalls can also accumulate over a longer time horizon, such as a number of consecutive trading days. Therefore, there can be no assurance that actual losses occurring on any given day arising from changes in market conditions will not exceed the VaR amounts shown below or that such losses will not occur more than once in a 20-day trading period.
September 30, December 31,September 30, December 31,
(Dollars in thousands)2017 20162018 2017
Interest Rate Risk$740
 $696
$399
 $965
Equity Price Risk82
 41
53
 62
Diversification Effect (1)(57) (26)(44) (40)
Total Value-at-Risk$765
 $711
$408
 $987
(1)
Equals the difference between total VaR and the sum of the VaRs for the two risk categories. This effect arises because the two market risk categories are not perfectly correlated.

The aggregate VaR as of September 30, 2018 was lower than the reported VaR on December 31, 2017. The decrease in VaR was due to lower inventory levels and our mix of inventory compared to the end of 2017.

We view average VaR over a period of time as more representative of trends in the business than VaR at any single point in time. The table below illustrates the daily high, low and average VaR calculated for each component of market risk during the nine months ended September 30, 20172018 and the year ended December 31, 20162017, respectively.
(Dollars in thousands)High Low AverageHigh Low Average
For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2017     
For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2018     
Interest Rate Risk$1,235
 $480
 $769
$1,084
 $329
 $703
Equity Price Risk178
 32
 87
91
 21
 56
Diversification Effect (1)    (62)    (40)
Total Value-at-Risk$1,244
 $506
 $794
$1,101
 $336
 $719
(Dollars in thousands)High Low AverageHigh Low Average
For the Year Ended December 31, 2016     
For the Year Ended December 31, 2017     
Interest Rate Risk$990
 $251
 $533
$1,235
 $480
 $785
Equity Price Risk412
 6
 150
178
 28
 81
Diversification Effect (1)    (72)    (57)
Total Value-at-Risk$1,049
 $362
 $611
$1,244
 $506
 $809
(1)
Equals the difference between total VaR and the sum of the VaRs for the two risk categories. This effect arises because the two market risk categories are not perfectly correlated. Because high and low VaR numbers for these risk categories may have occurred on different days, high and low numbers for diversification benefit would not be meaningful.

Trading losses exceeded our one-day VaR on one occasion during the first nine months of 2017.

The aggregate VaR as of September 30, 2017 was higher than the reported VaR on December 31, 2016. The increase in VaR was due to increased average inventory levels in asset classes that are accretive to VaR in the first nine months of 2017, compared to the end of 2016.2018.

In addition to VaR, we also employ additional measures to monitor and manage market risk exposure including net market position, duration exposure, option sensitivities, and inventory turnover. All metrics are aggregated by asset concentration and are used for monitoring limits and exception approvals. In times of market volatility, we also perform ad hoc stress tests and scenario analysis as market conditions dictate. Unlike our VaR, which measures potential losses within a given confidence level, stress scenarios do not have an associated implied probability. Rather, stress testing is used to estimate the potential loss from market moves outside our VaR confidence levels.

Liquidity Risk

Liquidity risk is the risk that we are unable to timely access necessary funding sources in order to operate our business, as well as the risk that we are unable to timely divest securities that we hold in connection with our market-making, sales and trading, and strategic trading activities. We are exposed to liquidity risk in our day-to-day funding activities, by holding potentially illiquid inventory positions and in our role as a remarketing agent for variable rate demand notes.

7165


Table of Contents

See the section entitled "Liquidity, Funding and Capital Resources" in Part I, Item 2, "Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations," in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for information regarding our liquidity and how we manage liquidity risk.

Our inventory positions, including those associated with strategic trading activities, subject us to potential financial losses from the reduction in value of illiquid positions. Market risk can be exacerbated in times of trading illiquidity when market participants refrain from transacting in normal quantities and/or at normal bid-offer spreads. Depending on the specific security, the structure of the financial product, and/or overall market conditions, we may be forced to hold a security for substantially longer than we had planned or forced to liquidate into a challenging market if funding becomes unavailable.

Credit Risk

Credit risk refers to the potential for loss due to the default or deterioration in credit quality of a counterparty, customer, borrower or issuer of securities we hold in our trading inventory. The nature and amount of credit risk depends on the type of transaction, the structure and duration of that transaction and the parties involved. Credit risk also results from an obligor's failure to meet the terms of any contract with us or otherwise fail to perform as agreed. This may be reflected through issues such as settlement obligations or payment collections.

Our different types of credit risk include:

Credit Spread Risk — Credit spread risk arises from the possibility that changes in credit spreads will affect the value of financial instruments. Credit spreads represent the credit risk premiums required by market participants for a given credit quality (e.g., the additional yield that a debt instrument issued by a AA-rated entity must produce over a risk-free alternative). Changes in credit spreads result from potential changes in an issuer’sissuer's credit rating or the market’smarket's perception of the issuer’sissuer's credit worthiness. We are exposed to credit spread risk with the debt instruments held in our trading inventory, including those held for strategic trading activites. We enter into transactions to hedge our exposure to credit spread risk through the use of derivatives and certain other financial instruments. These hedging strategies may not work in all market environments and as a result may not be effective in mitigating credit spread risk.

Deterioration/Default Risk — Deterioration/default risk represents the risk due to an issuer, counterparty or borrower failing to fulfill its obligations. We are exposed to deterioration/default risk in our role as a trading counterparty to dealers and customers, as a holder of securities, and as a member of exchanges. The risk of default depends on the creditworthiness of the counterparty and/or issuer of the security. We mitigate this risk by establishing and monitoring individual and aggregate position limits for each counterparty relative to potential levels of activity, holding and marking to market collateral on certain transactions. Our risk management functions also evaluate the potential risk associated with institutional counterparties with whom we hold derivatives, TBAs and other documented institutional counterparty agreements that may give rise to credit exposure.

Collections Risk — Collections risk arises from ineffective management and monitoring of collecting outstanding debts and obligations, including those related to our customer trading activities and margin lending. Our client activities involve the execution, settlement and financing of various transactions. Client activities are transacted on a delivery versus payment, cash or margin basis. Our credit exposure to institutional client business is mitigated by the use of industry-standard delivery versus payment through depositories and clearing banks. Credit exposure associated with our customer margin accounts in the U.S. is monitored daily. Our risk management functions have credit risk policies establishing appropriate credit limits and collateralization thresholds for our customers utilizing margin lending.

Concentration Risk— Concentration risk is the risk due to concentrated exposure to a particular product; individual issuer, borrower or counterparty; financial instrument; or geographic area. We are subject to concentration risk if we hold large individual securities positions, execute large transactions with individual counterparties or groups of related counterparties, or make substantial underwriting commitments. Concentration risk can occur by industry, geographic area or type of client. Securities purchased under agreements to resell consist primarily of securities issued by the U.S. government or its agencies. The counterparties to these agreements typically are primary dealers of U.S. government securities and major financial institutions. Inventory and investment positions taken and commitments made, including underwritings, may result in exposure to individual issuers and businesses. Potential concentration risk is carefully monitored through review of counterparties and borrowers and is managed through the use of policies and limits established by senior management.


7266


Table of Contents

We have concentrated counterparty credit exposure with five non-publicly rated entities totaling $20.813.5 million at September 30, 20172018. This counterparty credit exposure is part of our matched-book derivative program related to our public finance business, consisting primarily of interest rate swaps. One derivative counterparty represents 74.379.8 percent, or $15.410.8 million, of this exposure. Credit exposure associated with our derivative counterparties is driven by uncollateralized market movements in the fair value of the interest rate swap contracts and is monitored regularly by our financial risk committee. We attempt to minimize the credit (or repayment) risk in derivative instruments by entering into transactions with high-quality counterparties that are reviewed periodically by senior management.

Operational Risk

Operational risk is the risk of loss, or damage to our reputation, resulting from inadequate or failed processes, people and systems or from external events. We rely on the ability of our employees and our systems, both internal and at computer centers operated by third parties, to process a large number of transactions. Our systems may fail to operate properly or become disabled as a result of events that are wholly or partially beyond our control. In the event of a breakdown or improper operation of our systems or improper action by our employees or third party vendors, we could suffer financial loss, a disruption of our businesses, regulatory sanctions and damage to our reputation. We also face the risk of operational failure or termination of our relationship with any of the exchanges, clearing houses, fully disclosed clearing firms, or other financial intermediaries we use to facilitate our securities transactions. Any such failure or termination could adversely affect our ability to effect transactions and manage our exposure to risk.

Our operations rely on secure processing, storage and transmission of confidential and other information in our internal and outsourced computer systems and networks. Our computer systems, software and networks may be vulnerable to unauthorized access, computer viruses or other malicious code, internal misconduct or inadvertent errors and other events that could have an information security impact. The occurrence of one or more of these events, which we have experienced, could jeopardize our or our clients' or counterparties' confidential and other information processed and stored in, and transmitted through, our computer systems and networks, or otherwise cause interruptions or malfunctions in our, our clients', our counterparties' or third parties' operations. We take protective measures and endeavor to modify them as circumstances warrant.

In order to mitigate and control operational risk, we have developed and continue to enhance policies and procedures that are designed to identify and manage operational risk at appropriate levels throughout the organization. We also have business continuity plans in place that we believe will cover critical processes on a company-wide basis, and redundancies are built into our systems as we have deemed appropriate. These control mechanisms attempt to ensure that operational policies and procedures are being followed and that our various businesses are operating within established corporate policies and limits.

In the third quarter of 2017, we migrated to a fully disclosed clearing model for all of our self clearing operations. In a fully disclosed clearing model, we act as an introducing broker for client transactions and rely on Pershing, our clearing broker dealer, to facilitate clearance and settlement of our clients' securities transactions. The migration process introduced unique risks that could have caused disruptions inclearing services provided by Pershing are critical to our business or createdoperations, and similar to other unexpected capital charges or losses. We had preventative measures in place, including a project governance committee comprised of members of senior management, as well as senior management at ourservices performed by third party partner. In order to mitigate and control operational risk inherent in the migration, we had developed procedures specificvendors, any failure by Pershing with respect to the project implementation process, including parallel system operations, mock conversion testing,services we rely upon Pershing to provide could cause financial loss, significantly disrupt our business, damage our reputation, and ongoing monitoring and reporting to members of the project governance committee. We also had theadversely affect our ability to obtain additional methods of financing from existing creditors in the event unknown capital charges arose.serve our clients and manage our exposure to risk.

Human Capital Risk

Our business is a human capital business and our success is dependent upon the skills, expertise and performance of our employees. Human capital risks represent the risks posed if we fail to attract and retain qualified individuals who are motivated to serve the best interests of our clients, thereby serving the best interests of our company. Attracting and retaining employees depends, among other things, on our company's culture, management, work environment, geographic locations and compensation. There are risks associated with the proper recruitment, development and rewards of our employees to ensure quality performance and retention.

Legal and Regulatory Risk

Legal and regulatory risk includes the risk of non-compliance with applicable legal and regulatory requirements and loss to our reputation we may suffer as a result of failure to comply with laws, regulations, rules, related self-regulatory organization standards and codes of conduct applicable to our business activities. We are generally subject to extensive regulation in the various jurisdictions in which we conduct our business. We have established procedures that are designed to ensure compliance with applicable statutory and regulatory requirements, such as public company reporting obligations, regulatory net capital requirements, sales and trading practices, potential conflicts of interest, use and safekeeping of customer funds and securities, anti-money laundering, privacy and recordkeeping. We have also established procedures

7367


Table of Contents

recordkeeping. We have also established procedures that are designed to require that our policies relating to ethics and business conduct are followed. The legal and regulatory focus on the financial services industry presents a continuing business challenge for us.

Our business also subjects us to the complex income tax laws of the jurisdictions in which we have business operations, and these tax laws may be subject to different interpretations by the taxpayer and the relevant governmental taxing authorities. We must make judgments and interpretations about the application of these inherently complex tax laws when determining the provision for income taxes.

Effects of Inflation

Because our assets are liquid and generally short-term in nature, they are not significantly affected by inflation. However, the rate of inflation affects our expenses, such as employee compensation, office space leasing costs and communications charges, which may not be readily recoverable in the price of services we offer to our clients. To the extent inflation results in rising interest rates and has adverse effects upon the securities markets, it may adversely affect our financial position and results of operations.

ITEM 3.    QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK.

The information under the caption "Risk Management" in Part I, Item 2, "Management’s"Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations," in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q is incorporated herein by reference.

ITEM 4.    CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES.

As of the end of the period covered by this report, we conducted an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934). Based on this evaluation, our principal executive officer and principal financial officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in reports that we file or submit under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is (a) recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in Securities and Exchange Commission rules and forms and (b) accumulated and communicated to our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer to allow timely decisions regarding disclosure.

During the third quarter of our fiscal year ending December 31, 2017, we migrated to a fully disclosed clearing model for all of our self clearing broker dealer operations. Management believes this conversion may constitute a2018, there was no change in our system of internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting. Other than as described above, there were no other changes in our system of internal control over financial reporting during the third quarter of our fiscal year ending December 31, 2017 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

PART II.    OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1.    LEGAL PROCEEDINGS.

The discussion of our business and operations should be read together with the legal proceedings contained in Part I, Item 3 "Legal Proceedings" in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016.2017.


74


Table of Contents

ITEM 1A.    RISK FACTORS.

The discussion of our business and operations should be read together with the risk factors contained in Part I, Item 1A of"Risk Factors" in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016, as updated in our subsequent reports on Form 10-Q filed with the SEC.2017. These risk factors describe various risks and uncertainties to which we are or may become subject. These risks and uncertainties have the potential to affect our business, financial condition, results of operations, cash flows, strategies or prospects in a material and adverse manner. The following information updates risk factors from our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016.

The use of estimates and valuations in measuring fair value involve significant estimation and judgment by management.

We make various estimates that affect reported amounts and disclosures. Broadly, those estimates are used in measuring fair value of certain financial instruments, investments in private companies, accounting for goodwill and intangible assets, establishing provisions for potential losses that may arise from litigation, and regulatory proceedings and tax examinations. Estimates are based on available information and judgment. Therefore, actual results could differ from our estimates and that difference could have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements. With respect to accounting for goodwill, we complete our annual goodwill and intangible asset impairment testing in the fourth quarter of each year or earlier if goodwill impairment indicators are present. Impairment charges resulting from this valuation analysis could materially adversely affect our results of operations. In 2016, we recorded an $82.9 million non-cash impairment charge to reduce the carrying value of the goodwill associated with our Asset Management segment following significant net client outflows of AUM in 2016, primarily from our value equity strategies, due to investment performance below benchmarks and an extended cycle of investors favoring passive investment vehicles over active management. Throughout 2017, our Asset Management segment has experienced a further decline in profitability as revenues have decreased in product offerings with higher management fees, which has not been fully offset with earnings from new product offerings. As a result, we identified impairment indicators in the third quarter of 2017 related to our Asset Management segment, and performed an interim goodwill impairment test as of July 31, 2017, which resulted in a non-cash goodwill impairment charge of $114.4 million.

Financial instruments and other inventory positions owned, and financial instruments and other inventory positions sold but not yet purchased, are recorded at fair value, and unrealized gains and losses related to these financial instruments are reflected on our consolidated statements of operations. The fair value of a financial instrument is the amount at which the instrument could be exchanged in a transaction between market participants at the measurement date. Where available, fair value is based on observable market prices or parameters or derived from such prices or parameters. Where observable prices or inputs are not available, valuation models are applied. These valuation techniques involve management estimation and judgment, the degree of which is dependent on the price transparency for the instruments or market and the instruments' complexity. Difficult market environments, such as those experienced in 2008, may cause financial instruments to become substantially more illiquid and difficult to value, increasing the use of valuation models. Our future results of operations and financial condition may be adversely affected by the valuation adjustments that we apply to these financial instruments.

Investments in private companies are valued based on an assessment of each underlying security, considering rounds of financing, third party transactions and market-based information, including comparable company transactions, trading multiples (e.g., multiples of revenue and EBITDA) and changes in market outlook, among other factors. These valuation techniques require significant management estimation and judgment.

A failure to protect our computer systems, networks and information, and our clients’ information, against cyber attacks, data breaches, and similar threats could impair our ability to conduct our businesses, result in the disclosure, theft or destruction of confidential information, damage our reputation and cause significant financial and legal exposure.

Our operations rely on the secure processing, storage and transmission of confidential and other information in our computer systems and networks. There have been several highly publicized cases involving financial services companies, consumer-based companies and other companies, as well as governmental and political organizations, reporting breaches in the security of their websites, networks or other systems. Some of the publicized breaches have involved sophisticated and targeted attacks intended to obtain unauthorized access to confidential information, destroy data, disrupt or degrade service, sabotage systems or cause other damage, including through the introduction of computer viruses or malware, cyberattacks and other means. There have also been several highly publicized cases where hackers have requested "ransom" payments in exchange for not disclosing customer information.


7568


Table of Contents

A successful penetration or circumvention of the security of our systems could cause serious negative consequences for us, including significant disruption of our operations and those of our clients, customers and counterparties; misappropriation of our confidential information or that of our clients, customers, counterparties or employees; or damage to our computers or systems and those of our clients, customers and counterparties; and could result in violations of applicable privacy and other laws, financial loss to us or to our customers, loss of confidence in our security measures, customer dissatisfaction, significant litigation exposure and reputational harm, all of which could have a material adverse effect on us.

We must continuously monitor and develop our systems to protect our technology infrastructure and data from misappropriation or corruption. Despite our efforts to ensure the integrity of our systems and information, we have not been and may not be able to anticipate, detect or implement effective preventive measures against all cyber threats, especially because the techniques used are increasingly sophisticated, change frequently, and are often not recognized until months after the attack. Cyber attacks can originate from a variety of sources, including third parties who are affiliated with foreign governments or employees acting negligently or in a manner adverse to our interests. Third parties may seek to gain access to our systems either directly or using equipment or security passwords belonging to employees, customers, third-party service providers or other users of our systems. In addition, due to our interconnectivity with third-party vendors, central agents, exchanges, clearing houses and other financial institutions, we could be adversely impacted if any of them is subject to a successful cyber attack or other information security event.

Although we take protective measures and endeavor to modify them as circumstances warrant, our computer systems, software and networks have been and may be vulnerable to unauthorized access, misuse, computer viruses or other malicious code and other events that could have a security impact. We may be required to expend significant additional resources to modify our protective measures or to investigate and remediate vulnerabilities, exposures, or information security events. Due to the complexity and interconnectedness of our systems, the process of enhancing our protective measures can itself create a risk of systems disruptions and security issues.

The increased use of cloud technologies can heighten these and other operational risks. Certain aspects of the security of such technologies are unpredictable or beyond our control, and this lack of transparency may inhibit our ability to discover a failure by cloud service providers to adequately safeguard their systems and prevent cyber attacks that could disrupt our operations and result in misappropriation, corruption or loss of confidential and other information. In addition, there is a risk that encryption and other protective measures, despite their sophistication, may be defeated, particularly to the extent that new computing technologies vastly increase the speed and computing power available.

Legislative and regulatory proposals could significantly curtail the revenue from certain products that we currently provide or otherwise have a material adverse effect on our results of operations.

Proposed changes in laws or regulations relating to our business could decrease, perhaps significantly, the revenue that we receive from certain products or services that we provide, or otherwise have a material adverse effect on our results of operations. For example, proposed legislation brought under consideration by the U.S. House of Representatives in November 2017 would reduce the income tax rates paid by U.S. corporations, as well as limit certain other deductions that U.S. corporations can take. Although a reduction in overall corporate tax rates would generally be positive for our results of operations, it would cause us to incur a one-time non-cash write-off of our existing deferred tax assets based on the proposed lower rate. This write-off could be significant (i.e., $50 to $55 million) based on the tax rates currently proposed.  

In addition, the U.S. House of Representatives’ proposed tax reform legislation contains provisions that would eliminate advance refunding bonds and the tax exemption currently available for certain private activity bonds. Advance refunding bonds are those issued by a local or state government to refinance outstanding bonds before the original bonds mature or are callable in order to take advantage of lower borrowing costs. Tax-exempt private activity bonds are bonds issued by or on behalf of a local or state government for the purpose of financing facilities owned or used by private entities or 501(c)(3) organizations, including non-profit hospitals, universities, and multifamily and senior living housing developers. Our public finance investment banking business receives significant revenues as a result of underwriting activity in connection with debt issuances by government and non-profit clients, primarily on a tax-exempt basis. If advance refunding bonds and the tax exemption for certain private activity bonds are eliminated, our public finance business would be adversely effected to the extent that the elimination reduces the number of bond offerings, or those bond offerings are instead completed on a taxable basis and we are not able to compete effectively to serve as underwriter for those bonds. Also, federal law currently allows investors in debt issuances by government and non-profit entities to exclude the bond interest for federal income tax purposes, resulting in lower interest expense for the issuer as compared to a taxable financing. As the U.S. House of Representatives and U.S. Senate considers tax reform legislation, any other changes to, or a reduction or elimination of tax-exempt bond interest, or a reduction in individual income tax rates, could negatively impact the value of the municipal securities we hold in our securities inventory as well as our public finance investment banking business

76


Table of Contents

more generally, which would negatively impact the results of operations for these businesses.  At this time, however, it is not possible to ascertain which provisions will be included in a final legislative package or whether the legislation will pass at all and, therefore, we cannot estimate the total effect that these changes, if enacted, may have on our financial condition or results of operations.

ITEM 2.    UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS.

The table below sets forth the information with respect to purchases made by or on behalf of Piper Jaffray Companies or any "affiliated purchaser" (as defined in Rule 10b-18(a)(3) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934), of our common stock during the quarter ended September 30, 20172018.
     Total Number of Shares Approximate Dollar     Total Number of Shares Approximate Dollar
     Purchased as Part of Value of Shares Yet to be     Purchased as Part of Value of Shares Yet to be
 Total Number of Average Price Publicly Announced Purchased Under the Total Number of Average Price Publicly Announced Purchased Under the
Period Shares Purchased Paid per Share Plans or Programs 
Plans or Programs (1)
 Shares Purchased Paid per Share Plans or Programs 
Plans or Programs (1)
Month #1                  
(July 1, 2017 to July 31, 2017) 12,619
 $64.00
 
 $70
million
(July 1, 2018 to July 31, 2018) 11,889
 $75.80
 
 $146
million
Month #2                  
(August 1, 2017 to August 31, 2017) 2,825
 $57.75
 
 $70
million
(August 1, 2018 to August 31, 2018) 3,210
 $77.35
 
 $146
million
Month #3                  
(September 1, 2017 to September 30, 2017) 9,406
 $52.96
 9,406
 $150
million
(September 1, 2018 to September 30, 2018) 74,841
(2) 
$74.84
 67,892
 $141
million
Total 24,850
 $59.11
 9,406
 $150
million 89,940
 $75.06
 67,892
 $141
million
(1)
Effective August 14, 2015,September 30, 2017, our board of directors authorized the repurchase of up to $150.0 million of common stock through September 30, 2017. On August 10, 2017, our board2019.
(2)Consists of directors authorized the repurchase of up to $150.0 million67,892 shares of common stock effectiverepurchased on the open market pursuant to a 10b5-1 plan established with an independent agent at an average price of $74.62 per share, and 6,949 shares of common stock withheld from September 30, 2017 through September 30, 2019. There were no share repurchases underrecipients of restricted stock to pay taxes upon the authorization that became effective on September 30, 2017.vesting of the restricted stock at an average price of $77.00 per share.


77


Table of Contents

ITEM 6.    EXHIBITS.
Exhibit   Method
Number     Description of Filing
     
4.1  Filed herewith
4.2  (1)
4.3  (2)
31.1  Filed herewith
31.2  Filed herewith
32.1  Filed herewith
101 Interactive data files pursuant to Rule 405 Registration S-T: (i) the Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition as of September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, (ii) the Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, (iii) the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, (iv) the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 and (v) the notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements. Filed herewith

_________________
(1)Exhibit Index
ExhibitMethod
Number    Descriptionof Filing
31.1Filed herewith
31.2Filed herewith
32.1Filed herewith
101Interactive data files pursuant to Rule 405 Registration S-T: (i) the Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition as Exhibit 4.1of September 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, (ii) the Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2018 and 2017, (iii) the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2018 and 2017, (iv) the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the nine months ended September 30, 2018 and 2017 and (v) the notes to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on October 2, 2017, and incorporated by reference herein.

Consolidated Financial Statements.
(2)Filed as Exhibit 4.2 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on October 2, 2017, and incorporated by reference herein.herewith




SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report has beento be signed belowon its behalf by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities indicated on November 8, 2017.undersigned thereunto duly authorized.


PIPER JAFFRAY COMPANIES
  
Date:November 5, 2018By /s/ Andrew S. DuffChad R. Abraham
Its Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
  
Date:November 5, 2018By /s/ DebbraTimothy L. SchonemanCarter
Its Chief Financial Officer