PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements

THE BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS


	September 30,	December 31,	March 31,	December 31,
	2017	2016	2020	2019
	(unaudited)		(unaudited)
	(in thousands)		(in thousands)
ASSETS
Cash and cash equivalents
Cash and due from banks	$ 5,813	$ 4,127	$ 13,610	$ 19,928
Interest earning deposits at Federal Reserve Bank	328,023	955,733	105,978	924,544
Securities purchased under agreements to resell	65,095	39,199
Total cash and cash equivalents	398,931	999,059	119,588	944,472

Investment securities, available-for-sale, at fair value	1,196,956	1,248,614	1,353,278	1,320,692
Investment securities, held-to-maturity (fair value $85,099 and $91,799, respectively)	86,402	93,467
Commercial loans held for sale	380,272	663,140
Investment securities, held-to-maturity (fair value $83,002 at December 31, 2019)			-	84,387
Commercial loans held-for-sale, at fair value			1,716,450	1,180,546
Loans, net of deferred loan fees and costs	1,374,060	1,222,911	1,985,755	1,824,245
Allowance for loan and lease losses	(7,283)	(6,332)
Allowance for credit losses			(14,883)	(10,238)
Loans, net	1,366,777	1,216,579	1,970,872	1,814,007
Federal Home Loan Bank and Atlantic Central Bankers Bank stock	991	1,613	1,142	5,342
Premises and equipment, net	21,087	24,125	17,148	17,538
Accrued interest receivable	10,131	10,589	15,660	13,619
Intangible assets, net	5,185	6,906	2,857	2,315
Other real estate owned	-	104
Deferred tax asset, net	53,017	55,666	12,797	12,538
Investment in unconsolidated entity, at fair value	107,711	126,930	34,273	39,154
Assets held for sale from discontinued operations	314,994	360,711
Assets held-for-sale from discontinued operations			134,118	140,657
Other assets	51,164	50,611	79,925	81,696
Total assets	$ 3,993,618	$ 4,858,114	$ 5,458,108	$ 5,656,963

LIABILITIES
Deposits
Demand and interest checking	$ 3,113,212	$ 3,816,524	$ 4,512,949	$ 4,402,740
Savings and money market	452,183	421,780	178,174	174,290
Time deposits			-	475,000
Total deposits	3,565,395	4,238,304	4,691,123	5,052,030

Securities sold under agreements to repurchase	180	274	42	82
Short-term borrowings			140,000	-
Subordinated debentures	13,401	13,401	13,401	13,401
Long-term borrowings	42,482	263,099	40,813	40,991
Other liabilities	32,699	44,073	74,625	65,962
Total liabilities	3,654,157	4,559,151	4,960,004	5,172,466

SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
Common stock - authorized, 75,000,000 shares of $1.00 par value; 55,859,660 and 55,419,204
shares issued at September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively	55,860	55,419
Common stock - authorized, 75,000,000 shares of $1.00 par value; 57,425,556 and 56,940,521
shares issued and outstanding at March 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019, respectively			57,426	56,941
Treasury stock, at cost (100,000 shares)	(866)	(866)	(866)	(866)
Additional paid-in capital	362,340	360,564	372,984	371,633
Accumulated deficit	(77,850)	(111,941)
Accumulated other comprehensive loss	(23)	(4,213)
Accumulated earnings			60,960	50,742
Accumulated other comprehensive income			7,600	6,047
Total shareholders' equity	339,461	298,963	498,104	484,497

Total liabilities and shareholders' equity	$ 3,993,618	$ 4,858,114	$ 5,458,108	$ 5,656,963

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated ~~statements.~~statements.



	For the three months ended September 30,		For the nine months ended September 30,			For the three months ended March 31,
	2017	2016	2017	2016		2020	2019
	(in thousands, except per share data)					(in thousands, except per share data)
Interest income
Loans, including fees	$ 21,420	$ 17,697	$ 59,066	$ 48,928		$ 39,316	$ 30,499
Interest on investment securities:
Investment securities:
Taxable interest	8,847	8,350	26,990	22,782		10,495	10,530
Tax-exempt interest	86	142	228	639		32	47
Federal funds sold/securities purchased under agreements to resell	371	146	931	301
Interest earning deposits	1,190	397	3,961	1,677		1,623	2,502
	31,914	26,732	91,176	74,327		51,466	43,578
Interest expense
Deposits	3,688	2,906	10,554	8,692		8,228	8,870
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase	-	-	-	1
Short-term borrowings	175	153	197	263		165	503
Subordinated debenture	150	131	432	383
Subordinated debentures						162	195
	4,013	3,190	11,183	9,339		8,555	9,568
Net interest income	27,901	23,542	79,993	64,988		42,911	34,010
Provision for loan and lease losses	800	750	2,150	1,810
Net interest income after provision for loan and lease losses	27,101	22,792	77,843	63,178
Provision for credit losses						3,579	1,700
Net interest income after provision for credit losses						39,332	32,310

Non-interest income
Service fees on deposit accounts	1,700	1,510	4,895	3,335		10	47
Card payment and ACH processing fees	1,564	1,459	4,596	4,183
Prepaid card fees	12,491	12,249	39,272	39,333
Gain on sale of loans	11,394	903	17,535	809
Gain on sale of investment securities	506	981	1,595	3,131
ACH, card and other payment processing fees						1,846	2,303
Prepaid, debit card and related fees						18,540	16,163
Net realized and unrealized gains (losses) on commercial loans originated for sale						(5,156)	10,763
Change in value of investment in unconsolidated entity	(4)	811	(20)	(12,313)		(45)	-
Leasing income	705	588	2,088	1,456
Affinity fees	275	1,091	1,445	3,507
Gain on sale of health savings accounts	-	-	2,538	-
Loss from sale of European prepaid operations	-	-	(3,437)	-
Leasing related income						833	695
Other	376	312	892	4,691		571	394
Total non-interest income	29,007	19,904	71,399	48,132		16,599	30,365

Non-interest expense
Salaries and employee benefits	21,788	21,508	57,902	62,400		22,741	23,840
Depreciation and amortization	1,080	1,241	3,405	3,751		844	974
Rent and related occupancy cost	1,368	1,638	4,227	4,797		1,419	1,428
Data processing expense	1,926	3,507	8,047	10,949		1,169	1,269
One time fee to exit data processing contract	1,136	-	1,136	-
Printing and supplies	282	825	1,120	2,194		158	140
Audit expense	393	246	1,270	746		401	467
Legal expense	2,744	814	5,909	3,786		913	1,324
Amortization of intangible assets	377	394	1,133	1,032		147	383
Losses on sale and write downs on other real estate owned	-	-	19	-
FDIC insurance	2,063	2,436	7,586	7,118		2,589	1,929
Software	3,088	3,032	9,328	8,266		3,477	2,921
Insurance	633	631	1,853	1,695		623	594
Telecom and IT network communications	426	582	1,443	1,547		392	325
Securitization and servicing expense	-	-	100	747
Consulting	505	1,701	1,745	4,214		255	635
Bank Secrecy Act and lookback consulting expenses	-	1,340	-	29,076
Civil money penalty	2,500	-	2,500	-
Other						3,290	3,000
Total non-interest expense						38,418	39,229
Income from continuing operations before income taxes						17,513	23,446
Income tax expense					Income tax expense	4,352	6,035
Net income from continuing operations						$ 13,161	$ 17,411
Discontinued operations
Income (loss) from discontinued operations before income taxes						(775)	805
Income tax expense (benefit)					Income tax expense (benefit)	(205)	286
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax						(570)	519
Net income						$ 12,591	$ 17,930

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated ~~statements.~~statements.

For the nine months

ended September 30,

2017

2016

(in thousands)

Net income (loss)
$                  34,108

$               (67,720)
Other comprehensive income (loss) net of reclassifications into net income:

Other comprehensive income (loss)

Change in net unrealized gain during the period
8,194

19,207
Reclassification adjustments for gains included in income
(1,595)

(3,131)
Reclassification adjustments for foreign currency translation gains
216

335
Amortization of losses previously held as available-for-sale
25

25
Net unrealized gain
6,840

16,436

Deferred tax expense

Securities available-for-sale:

Change in net unrealized gain during the period
3,278

7,683
Reclassification adjustments for gains included in income
(638)

(1,252)
Amortization of losses previously held as available-for-sale
10

10
Income tax expense related to items of other comprehensive income
2,650

6,441

Other comprehensive income net of tax and reclassifications into net income
4,190

9,995
Comprehensive income (loss)
$                  38,298

$               (57,725)



	For the three months ended March 31,
	2020	2019
	(in thousands)

Net income	$ 12,591	$ 17,930
Other comprehensive income net of reclassifications into net income:

Other comprehensive income
Securities available-for-sale:
Change in net unrealized gain during the period	2,122	11,844
Amortization of losses previously held as available-for-sale	5	7
Other comprehensive income	2,127	11,851

Income tax expense related to items of other comprehensive income
Securities available-for-sale:
Change in net unrealized gain during the period	573	3,199
Amortization of losses previously held as available-for-sale	1	2
Income tax expense related to items of other comprehensive income	574	3,201

Other comprehensive income net of tax and reclassifications into net income	1,553	8,650
Comprehensive income	$ 14,144	$ 26,580

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated ~~statements.~~statements.

THE BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

~~UNAUDITED~~UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY


For the nine months ended September 30, 2017
For the three months ended March 31, 2020									For the three months ended March 31, 2020
(in thousands, except share data)	(in thousands, except share data)								(in thousands, except share data)

						Retained	Accumulated								Accumulated
		Common			Additional	earnings/	other			Common			Additional	Accumulated	other
		stock	Common	Treasury	paid-in	(accumulated	comprehensive			stock	Common	Treasury	paid-in	earnings	comprehensive
		shares	stock	stock	capital	deficit)	income (loss)	Total		shares	stock	stock	capital	(deficit)	income	Total

Balance at January 1, 2017		55,419,204	$ 55,419	$ (866)	$ 360,564	$ (111,941)	$ (4,213)	$ 298,963
Balance at January 1, 2020										56,940,521	$ 56,941	$ (866)	$ 371,633	$ 50,742	$ 6,047	$ 484,497
Adoption of current expected credit loss
accounting, net of taxes										-	-	-	-	(2,373)	-	(2,373)
Net income		-	-	-	-	34,108	-	34,108		-	-	-	-	12,591	-	12,591
Common stock issuance expense		-	-	-	(200)	-	-	(200)
Common stock issued from restricted shares,
Common stock issued from option exercises,
net of tax benefits										74,000	74	-	546	-	-	620
Common stock issued from restricted units,
net of tax benefits		440,456	441	-	(424)	(17)	-	-		411,035	411	-	(411)	-	-	-
Stock-based compensation		-	-	-	2,400	-	-	2,400		-	-	-	1,216	-	-	1,216
Other comprehensive income net of
reclassification adjustments and tax		-	-	-	-	-	4,190	4,190		-	-	-	-	-	1,553	1,553

Balance at September 30, 2017		55,859,660	$ 55,860	$ (866)	$ 362,340	$ (77,850)	$ (23)	$ 339,461
Balance at March 31, 2020										57,425,556	$ 57,426	$ (866)	$ 372,984	$ 60,960	$ 7,600	$ 498,104

For the nine months

ended September 30,

2017

2016

(in thousands)
Operating activities

Net income (loss) from continuing operations

$            30,670

$          (29,811)
Net income (loss) from discontinued operations

3,438

(37,909)
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash

provided by operating activities

Depreciation and amortization

4,538

4,783
Provision for loan and lease losses

2,150

1,810
Net amortization of investment securities discounts/premiums

6,955

6,066
Stock-based compensation expense

2,400

1,990
Loans originated for sale

(398,410)

(372,065)
Sale of loans originated for resale

453,976

299,855
Gain on sales of loans originated for resale

(13,119)

(809)
Loss (gain) on sale of fixed assets

28

(21)
Loss on sale of other real estate owned

19

-
Fair value adjustment on investment in unconsolidated entity

(20)

14,753
Gain on sales of investment securities

(1,595)

(3,131)
Decrease (increase) in accrued interest receivable

458

(1,025)
Decrease (increase) in other assets

872

(19,290)
Decrease (increase) in discontinued assets held for sale

1,123

(5,779)
Increase (decrease) in other liabilities

(18,794)

10,505
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities

74,689

(130,078)

Investing activities

Purchase of investment securities available-for-sale

(237,870)

(499,969)
Proceeds from sale of investment securities available-for-sale

83,918

115,637
Proceeds from redemptions and prepayments of securities held-to-maturity

7,000

51
Proceeds from redemptions and prepayments of securities available-for-sale

234,163

133,212
Proceeds from sale of other real estate owned

85

-
Net increase in loans

(152,484)

(120,312)
Net decrease in discontinued loans held for sale

44,594

203,533
Proceeds from sale of fixed assets

366

341
Purchases of premises and equipment

(625)

(4,237)
Investment in unconsolidated entity

19,239

6,371
Net cash used in investing activities

(1,614)

(165,373)

Financing activities

Net decrease in deposits

(672,909)

(647,822)
Net decrease in securities sold under agreements to repurchase

(94)

(572)
Proceeds of short-term borrowings and federal funds purchased

-

70,000
Common stock issuance expense

(200)

-
Proceeds from the issuance of common stock

-

74,812
Net cash used in financing activities

(673,203)

(503,582)

Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents

(600,128)

(799,033)

Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period

999,059

1,155,162

Cash and cash equivalents, end of period

$          398,931

$          356,129

Supplemental disclosure:

Interest paid

$            11,176

$              9,514
Taxes paid

$              1,051

$                 366


For the three months ended March 31, 2019
(in thousands, except share data)
						Accumulated
	Common			Additional	Accumulated	other
	stock	Common	Treasury	paid-in	earnings	comprehensive
	shares	stock	stock	capital	(deficit)	(loss)/income	Total

Balance at January 1, 2019	56,446,088	$ 56,446	$ (866)	$ 366,181	$ (817)	$ (14,168)	406,776
Net income	-	-	-	-	17,930	-	17,930
Common stock issued from restricted units,
net of tax benefits	121,916	122	-	(122)	-	-	-
Stock-based compensation	-	-	-	1,424	-	-	1,424
Other comprehensive income net of
reclassification adjustments and tax	-	-	-	-	-	8,650	8,650

Balance at March 31, 2019	56,568,004	$ 56,568	$ (866)	$ 367,483	$ 17,113	$ (5,518)	$ 434,780

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated ~~statements.~~statements.



	For the three months
	ended March 31,
	2020	2019
	(in thousands)
Operating activities
Net income from continuing operations	$ 13,161	$ 17,411
Net income (loss) from discontinued operations	(570)	519
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash (used in) provided by operating activities
Depreciation and amortization	991	1,357
Provision for credit losses	3,579	1,700
Net amortization of investment securities discounts/premiums	4,459	4,149
Stock-based compensation expense	1,216	1,424
Loans originated for sale	(541,616)	(403,241)
Sale of commercial loans originated for resale	2,535	491,005
Loss (gain) on commercial loans originated for resale	144	(11,198)
Loss (gain) from discontinued operations	536	(67)
Fair value adjustment on investment in unconsolidated entity	45	-
Change in fair value of loans held-for-sale	2,855	(329)
Change in fair value of derivatives	2,158	764
Increase in accrued interest receivable	(2,041)	(1,154)
Decrease (increase) in other assets	3,180	(13,483)
Increase in other liabilities	1,975	10,125
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities	(507,393)	98,982

Investing activities
Purchase of investment securities available-for-sale	(12,000)	(69,901)
Proceeds from redemptions and prepayments of securities available-for-sale	61,487	48,556
Net cash paid due to acquisitions, net of cash acquired	(3,920)	-
Net increase in loans	(153,273)	(5,944)
Net decrease in discontinued loans held-for-sale	4,871	6,478
Purchases of premises and equipment	(380)	(208)
Change in receivable from investment in unconsolidated entity	83	-
Return of investment in unconsolidated entity	4,836	1,015
Decrease in discontinued assets held-for-sale	1,132	3,328
Net used in investing activities	(97,164)	(16,676)

Financing activities
Net (decrease) increase in deposits	(360,907)	89,584
Net decrease in securities sold under agreements to repurchase	(40)	-
Proceeds of short-term borrowings	140,000	-
Proceeds from the issuance of common stock	620	-
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities	(220,327)	89,584

Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents	(824,884)	171,890

Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period	944,472	554,302

Cash and cash equivalents, end of period	$ 119,588	$ 726,192

Supplemental disclosure:
Interest paid	$ 7,490	$ 9,498
Taxes paid	$ 1,093	$ 1,425
Non-cash investing and financing activities
Investment securities purchased and not settled	$ -	$ 61,527
Investment securities transferred in securitization transaction	$ -	$ 41,633
Loan transferred in acquisition	$ 3,961	$ -
Transfers of discontinued loans to other real estate owned	$ -	$ 5,295

The Bancorp, Inc. (the Company) is a Delaware corporation and a registered financial holding company. Its primary subsidiary is The Bancorp Bank (the Bank) which is wholly owned by the Company. The Bank is a Delaware chartered commercial bank located in Wilmington, Delaware and is a Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) insured institution. In its continuing operations, the Bank has four primary lines of specialty lending: securities-backed lines of credit (SBLOC) and cash value of insurance-backed lines of credit (IBLOC), leasing (direct lease financing), Small Business Administration (SBA) loans and loans generated for sale into capital markets primarily through commercial loan securitizations (CMBS). Through the Bank, the Company also provides banking services nationally, which include prepaid and debit cards, private label banking, ~~institutional banking,~~deposit accounts to investment advisors’ customers, card payment and other payment processing.

The Company and the Bank are subject to regulation by certain state and federal agencies and, accordingly, they are examined periodically by those regulatory authorities. As a consequence of the extensive regulation of commercial banking activities, the Company’s and the Bank’s businesses may be affected by state and federal legislation and regulations.

The financial statements of the Company, as of ~~September 30, 2017~~March 31, 2020 and for the three ~~and nine~~ month periods ended ~~September 30, 2017~~March 31, 2020 and ~~2016,~~2019, are unaudited. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (U.S. GAAP) have been condensed or omitted in this Form 10-Q pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange ~~Commission.~~Commission (SEC). However, in the opinion of management, these interim financial statements include all necessary adjustments to fairly present the results of the interim periods presented. The unaudited interim consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited financial statements included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, ~~2016 (2016~~2019 (2019 Form 10-K Report). The results of operations for the ~~nine~~three month period ended ~~September 30, 2017~~March 31, 2020 may not necessarily be indicative of the results of operations for the full year ending December 31, ~~2017.~~ 2020.

The Company recognizes revenue when the performance obligations related to the transfer of goods or services under the terms of a contract are satisfied. Some obligations are satisfied at a point in time while others are satisfied over a period of time. Revenue is recognized as the amount of consideration to which the Company expects to be entitled to in exchange for transferring goods or services to a customer. When consideration includes a variable component, the amount of consideration attributable to variability is included in the transaction price only to the extent it is probable that significant revenue recognized will not be reversed when uncertainty associated with the variable consideration is subsequently resolved. The Company’s contracts generally do not contain terms that require significant judgment to determine the variability impacting the transaction price.

A performance obligation is deemed satisfied when the control over goods or services is transferred to the customer. Control is transferred to a customer either at a point in time or over time. To determine when control is transferred at a point in time, the Company considers indicators, including but not limited to the right to payment for the asset, transfer of significant risk and rewards of ownership of the asset and acceptance of the asset by the customer. When control is transferred over a period of time, for different performance obligations, either the input or output method is used to measure progress for the transfer. The measure of progress used to assess completion of the performance obligation varies between performance obligations and may be based on time throughout the period of service or on the value of goods and services transferred to the customer. As each distinct service or activity is performed, the Company transfers control to the customer based on the services performed as the customer simultaneously receives the benefits of those services. This timing of revenue recognition aligns with the resolution of any uncertainty related to variable consideration. Costs incurred to obtain a revenue producing contract generally are expensed when incurred as a practical expedient as the contractual period for the majority of contracts is one year or less. The Company’s revenue streams that are in the scope of Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) 606 include prepaid and debit card, card payment, ACH and deposit processing and other fees. The fees on those revenue streams are generally assessed and collected as the transaction occurs, or on a monthly or quarterly basis. The Company has completed its review of the contracts and other agreements that are within the scope of revenue guidance and did not identify any material changes to the timing or amount of revenue recognition. The Company’s accounting policies did not change materially since the principles of revenue recognition in American Standards Update (ASU) 2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers”are largely consistent with previous practices already implemented and applied by the Company. The vast majority of the Company’s services related to its revenues are performed, earned and recognized monthly.

Prepaid and debit card fees primarily include fees for services related to reconciliation, fraud detection, regulatory compliance and other services which are performed and earned daily or monthly and are also billed and collected on a monthly basis. Accordingly, there is no significant component of the services the Company performs or related revenues which are deferred. The Company earns transactional and/or interchange fees on prepaid card accounts when transactions occur and revenue is billed and collected monthly or quarterly. Certain volume or transaction based interchange expenses paid to payment networks such as Visa, reduce revenue which is presented net on the income statement. Card payment and ACH processing fees include transaction fees earned for processing merchant transactions. Revenue is recognized when a cardholder’s transaction is approved and settled, or monthly. ACH processing fees are earned on a per item basis as the transactions are processed for third-party clients and are also billed and collected monthly. Service charges on deposit accounts include fees and other charges the Company receives to provide various services, including, but not limited to, account maintenance, check writing, wire transfer and other services normally associated with deposit accounts. Revenue for these services is recognized monthly as the services are performed. The Company’s customer contracts do not typically have performance obligations and fees are collected and earned when the transaction occurs. The Company may, from time to time, waive certain fees for customers but generally does not reduce the transaction price to reflect variability for future reversals due to the insignificance of the amounts. Waiver of fees reduces the revenue in the period the waiver is granted to the customer.

The Company determines if an arrangement is a lease at inception. Operating lease right-of-use (ROU) assets and operating lease liabilities are included in our consolidated financial statements. ROU assets represent our right-of-use of an underlying asset for the lease term and lease liabilities represent our obligation to make lease payments pursuant to our leases. The ROU assets and liabilities are recognized at commencement of the lease based on the present value of lease payments over the lease term. To determine the present value of lease payments, the Company uses its incremental borrowing rate. The lease term may include options to extend or terminate the lease when it is reasonably certain that we will exercise that option. Lease expense is recognized on a straight-line basis over the lease term.

ASC 275 addresses disclosures when it is reasonably possible that estimates in the financial statements may change in future periods. The ultimate severity of the economic impact of Coronavirus is not known, but its negative impact may exceed the effect of current or future government mitigation efforts, which could impact loan performance. Additionally, under regulatory guidance loans may be granted six month payment deferrals without classification as non-accrual, delinquency or troubled debt restructuring, barring other information which would require such classification. We have followed the guidance of regulators and are granting such deferrals, but the duration of the crisis is uncertain and government actions after that period are unknown. Accordingly, our future estimates for the provision for loan losses could increase while the estimated values of loans accounted for on the basis of fair value could decrease, either of which would reduce our income.

The Company recognizes compensation expense for stock options in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) 718, “Stock Based Compensation”. The expense of the option is generally measured at fair value at the grant date with compensation expense recognized over the service period, which is typically the vesting period. For grants subject to a service condition, the Company utilizes the Black-Scholes option-pricing model to estimate the fair value of each option on the date of grant. The Black-Scholes model takes into consideration the exercise price and expected life of the options, the current price of the underlying stock and its expected volatility, the expected dividends on the stock and the current risk-free interest rate for the expected life of the option. The Company’s estimate of the fair value of a stock option is based on expectations derived from historical experience and may not necessarily equate to its market value when fully vested. In accordance with ASC 718, the Company estimates the number of options for which the requisite service is expected to be rendered. At ~~September 30, 2017,~~March 31, 2020, the Company had ~~two~~three active stock-based compensation plans which are ~~more fully~~ described in ~~its 2016~~the 2019 Form 10-K Report.

The Company did not grant ~~stock~~any options during the ~~nine~~three month period ended ~~September 30, 2017.~~March 31, 2020. The Company granted ~~300,000~~65,104 stock options with a vesting period of ~~four~~4 years induring the ~~first nine months of 2016.~~ three month period ended March 31, 2019. The weighted average grant-date fair value was $3.84.There were ~~28,500~~74,000 common stock options exercised in the ~~nine~~three month ~~periods~~period ended ~~September 30, 2017,~~March 31, 2020, and no common stock options were exercised during the ~~nine~~three month period ended ~~September 30, 2016.~~ March 31, 2019.

A summary of the ~~status of the~~ Company’s ~~equity compensation plans~~stock options is presented below.



							Weighted average
							remaining
			Weighted average			Weighted average	contractual	Aggregate
			remaining		Shares	exercise price	term (years)	intrinsic value
		Weighted average	contractual	Aggregate
	Shares	exercise price	term (years)	intrinsic value
Outstanding at January 1, 2017	2,021,625	$ 8.32	5.24	$ -
Outstanding at January 1, 2020					1,311,604	$ 8.24	3.11	$ 6,203,523
Granted	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Exercised	(28,500)	7.36	-	-	-	-	-	-
Expired	(1,000)	25.43	-	-	(74,000)	8.38	-	-
Forfeited	(38,750)	8.37	-	-	(8,000)	9.39	-	-
Outstanding at September 30, 2017	1,953,375	$ 8.31	4.51	$ 941,090
Exercisable at September 30, 2017	1,705,875	$ 8.50	3.93	$ 599,090
Outstanding at March 31, 2020					1,229,604	$ 8.22	2.95	$ -
Exercisable at March 31, 2020					1,105,776	$ 8.31	2.47	$ -

The Company ~~granted 955,024~~did not grant any restricted stock units (RSUs) in the first ~~nine~~three months of 2017 of which 820,024 have a vesting period of three years and 135,000 have a vesting period of one year. At issuance, for the RSUs granted in the first nine months of 2017: 799,559 had a fair value of $5.06, 7,923 had a fair value of $6.31 and 147,542 had a fair value of $7.65.2020. In the first ~~nine~~three months of ~~2016,~~2019, the Company granted ~~789,000 restricted~~930,831 RSUs, of which ~~620,000~~863,331 had a vesting period of ~~three~~3 years and ~~169,000~~67,500 had a vesting period of one year. ~~Of the~~The 930,831 RSUs granted in the first ~~nine~~three months of ~~2016, 489,000~~2019 had a fair value of ~~$4.50 and 300,000 had a fair value of $6.75 at issuance. The total fair value of RSUs vested for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 was $2.6 million and $830,000, respectively.~~$8.57 per unit.



		Weighted average	Average remaining		Weighted average	Average remaining
		grant date	contractual		grant date	contractual
	Shares	fair value	term (years)	Shares	fair value	term (years)
Outstanding at January 1, 2017	831,775	$ 5.77	1.62
Outstanding at January 1, 2020				1,253,927	$ 8.87	1.64
Granted	955,024	5.47		-	-	-
Vested	(438,441)	5.89		(411,038)	7.96	-
Forfeited	(83,904)	5.93		(10,351)	9.66	-
Outstanding at September 30, 2017	1,264,454	$ 5.49	1.92
Outstanding at March 31, 2020				832,538	$ 9.31	1.49

As of ~~September 30, 2017,~~March 31, 2020, there was a total of ~~$5.9~~$6.0 million of unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested awards under share-based plans. This cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of approximately ~~2.0~~1.43 years. Related compensation expense for the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September 30, 2017~~March 31, 2020 and ~~2016~~2019 was ~~$2.4~~$1.2 million and ~~$2.0~~$1.4 million, respectively. The total issuance date fair value of RSUs vested and options exercised during the three months ended March 31, 2020 and 2019 was $3.5 million and $589,000, respectively. The total intrinsic value of the options exercised and stock units vested in those respective periods was $5.3 million and $1.0 million, respectively.

For the periods ended March 31, 2020 and 2019, the Company estimated fair value of each stock option grant on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes options pricing model with the following weighted average assumptions:

Expected volatility is based on the historical volatility of the Company’s stock and peer group comparisons over the expected life of the grant. The risk-free rate for periods within the expected life of the option is based on the U.S. Treasury strip rate in effect at the time of the grant. The life of the option is based on historical factors which include the contractual term, vesting period, exercise behavior and employee terminations. In accordance with the ASC 718, Stock Based Compensation, stock based compensation expense for the period ended March 31, 2020 is based on awards that are ultimately expected to vest and has been reduced for estimated forfeitures. The Company estimated forfeitures using historical data based upon the groups identified by management.

The Company calculates earnings per share under ASC 260, “Earnings Per Share”. Basic earnings per share exclude dilution and are computed by dividing income available to common shareholders by the weighted average common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per share takes into account the potential dilution that could occur if securities or other contracts to issue common stock were exercised and converted into common stock.

The following tables show the Company’s earnings per share for the periods presented:



	For the three months ended			For the three months ended
	September 30, 2017			March 31, 2020
	Income	Shares	Per share	Income	Shares	Per share
	(numerator)	(denominator)	amount	(numerator)	(denominator)	amount

	(dollars in thousands except share and per share data)			(dollars in thousands except share and per share data)
Basic earnings per share from continuing operations
Net earnings available to common shareholders	$ 6,770	55,758,433	$ 0.12	$ 13,161	57,220,844	$ 0.23
Effect of dilutive securities
Common stock options	-	554,405	-
Common stock options and restricted stock units				-	705,941	-
Diluted earnings per share
Net earnings available to common shareholders	$ 6,770	56,312,838	$ 0.12	$ 13,161	57,926,785	$ 0.23



		For the three months ended			For the three months ended
		September 30, 2017			March 31, 2020
		Income	Shares	Per share	Income	Shares	Per share
		(numerator)	(denominator)	amount	(numerator)	(denominator)	amount
	��
		(dollars in thousands except share and per share data)			(dollars in thousands except share and per share data)
Basic earnings per share
Net earnings available to common shareholders		$ 7,281	55,758,433	$ 0.13	$ 12,591	57,220,844	$ 0.22
Effect of dilutive securities
Common stock options		-	554,405	-
Common stock options and restricted stock units					-	705,941	-
Diluted earnings per share
Net earnings available to common shareholders		$ 7,281	56,312,838	$ 0.13	$ 12,591	57,926,785	$ 0.22

Stock options for ~~1,633,375~~1,229,604 shares, exercisable at prices between $6.75 and $10.45 per share, were outstanding at ~~September 30, 2017, but~~March 31, 2020, and accordingly were not included in the dilutive ~~shares~~earnings per share computation because the exercise price per share was greater than the average market price. Thus, all options outstanding were anti-dilutive.

Stock options for 1,953,375 shares, exercisable at prices between $6.75 and $10.45 per share, were outstanding at September 30, 2017, but were not included in the dilutive shares because the exercise price per share was greater than the average market price.

Stock options for ~~2,036,500~~919,000 shares, exercisable at prices between $6.75 and ~~$25.43~~$8.57 per share, were outstanding at ~~September 30, 2016 but~~March 31, 2019, and included in the dilutive earnings per share computation shares because the exercise price per share was less than the average market price. Stock options for 422,604 were anti-dilutive and not included in ~~dilutive shares because~~ the ~~Company had a net loss available to common shareholders.~~earnings per share calculation.

Stock options for 2,036,500 shares exercisable at prices between $6.75 and $25.43 per share, were outstanding at September 30, 2016 but were not included in dilutive shares because the Company had a net loss available to common shareholders.

In March 2020, the Company transferred the four securities comprising its held-to-maturity securities portfolio to available-for-sale. The interest rates for these securities utilize LIBOR as a benchmark and were permitted to be transferred by a provision of ASU 2020-04, to maximize management and accounting flexibility as a result of the phase-out of LIBOR. The amortized cost, gross unrealized gains and losses, and fair values of the Company’s investment securities classified as available-for-sale and held-to-maturity at ~~September 30, 2017~~March 31, 2020 and December 31, ~~2016~~2019 are summarized as follows (in thousands):



Available-for-sale	September 30, 2017				March 31, 2020
		Gross	Gross			Gross	Gross
	Amortized	unrealized	unrealized	Fair	Amortized	unrealized	unrealized	Fair
	cost	gains	losses	value	cost	gains	losses	value
U.S. Government agency securities	$ 35,162	$ 87	$ (24)	$ 35,225	$ 49,075	$ 1,444	$ (132)	$ 50,387
Asset-backed securities *	264,196	1,182	(439)	264,939	243,041	-	(13,789)	229,252
Tax-exempt obligations of states and political subdivisions	13,157	179	(17)	13,319	5,175	163	-	5,338
Taxable obligations of states and political subdivisions	71,592	1,671	(150)	73,113	56,128	2,955	(4)	59,079
Residential mortgage-backed securities	367,017	840	(3,420)	364,437	318,963	9,261	(1,902)	326,322
Collateralized mortgage obligation securities	129,722	294	(923)	129,093	204,774	6,351	(972)	210,153
Commercial mortgage-backed securities	153,274	488	(114)	153,648	380,571	13,415	(1,991)	391,995
Foreign debt securities	59,685	398	(88)	59,995
Corporate debt securities	102,205	1,047	(65)	103,187	85,140	460	(4,848)	80,752
	$ 1,196,010	$ 6,186	$ (5,240)	$ 1,196,956	$ 1,342,867	$ 34,049	$ (23,638)	$ 1,353,278


	September 30, 2017				March 31, 2020
		Gross	Gross			Gross	Gross
	Amortized	unrealized	unrealized	Fair	Amortized	unrealized	unrealized	Fair
* Asset-backed securities as shown above	cost	gains	losses	value	cost	gains	losses	value
Federally insured student loan securities	$ 94,409	$ 254	$ (418)	$ 94,245	$ 32,109	$ -	$ (1,045)	$ 31,064
Collateralized loan obligation securities	153,369	800	(19)	154,150	210,932	-	(12,744)	198,188
Other	16,418	128	(2)	16,544
	$ 264,196	$ 1,182	$ (439)	$ 264,939	$ 243,041	$ -	$ (13,789)	$ 229,252



Held-to-maturity	December 31, 2016				December 31, 2019
		Gross	Gross			Gross	Gross
	Amortized	unrealized	unrealized	Fair	Amortized	unrealized	unrealized	Fair
	cost	gains	losses	value	cost	gains	losses	value
Other debt securities - single issuers	$ 17,983	$ 179	$ (3,026)	$ 15,136	$ 9,219	$ -	$ (2,067)	$ 7,152
Other debt securities - pooled	75,484	1,179	-	76,663	75,168	682	-	75,850
	$ 93,467	$ 1,358	$ (3,026)	$ 91,799	$ 84,387	$ 682	$ (2,067)	$ 83,002

Investments in Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB) and Atlantic Central Bankers Bank stock are recorded at cost and amounted to ~~$991,000~~$1.1 million and ~~$1.6~~$5.3 million, respectively, at ~~September 30, 2017~~March 31, 2020 and December 31, ~~2016.~~2019. The amount of FHLB stock required to be held is based on the amount of borrowings, and after such borrowings, the stock may be redeemed.

The amortized cost and fair value of the Company’s investment securities at ~~September 30, 2017,~~March 31, 2020, by contractual maturity, are shown below (in thousands). Expected maturities may differ from contractual maturities because borrowers have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without call or prepayment penalties.



	Available-for-sale		Held-to-maturity		Available-for-sale		Held-to-maturity
	Amortized	Fair	Amortized	Fair	Amortized	Fair	Amortized	Fair
	cost	value	cost	value	cost	value	cost	value
Due before one year	$ 6,433	$ 6,441	$ -	$ -	$ 6,829	$ 6,818	$ -	$ -
Due after one year through five years	170,145	171,473	-	-	100,793	104,670	-	-
Due after five years through ten years	361,549	362,268	-	-	234,846	242,311	-	-
Due after ten years	657,883	656,774	86,402	85,099	1,000,399	999,479	-	-
	$ 1,196,010	$ 1,196,956	$ 86,402	$ 85,099	$ 1,342,867	$ 1,353,278	$ -	$ -

At ~~September 30, 2017~~March 31, 2020 and December 31, ~~2016, there were~~2019, no investment securities pledged for securities sold under repurchase agreements as required or permitted by law. At September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, investment securities with a fair value of approximately $606.8 million and $607.2 million, respectively, were ~~pledged to secure a line of credit with the FHLB.~~encumbered through pledging.

Fair ~~value~~values of available-for-sale securities are based on the fair market ~~value~~values supplied by a third-party market data provider, ~~while the~~or where such third-party market data is not available, fair ~~value of held-to-maturity securities~~values are based on ~~the present value of cash flows, which discounts expected cash flows from principal~~

and interest using yield to maturity at the measurement date. The Company periodically reviews its investment portfolio to determine whether unrealized losses are other than temporary, based on an evaluation of the creditworthiness of the issuers/guarantors as well as the underlying collateral, if applicable, in addition to the continuing performance of the securities. The amount of the credit impairment is calculated by estimating the discounted cash ~~flows for those securities.~~flows. The ~~Company did not recognize any other-than-temporary impairment charges in the first nine months of 2017.~~third-party market data provider uses a pricing matrix which it creates daily, taking into consideration actual trade data, projected prepayments, and when relevant, projected credit defaults and losses.

The table below indicates the length of time individual securities had been in a continuous unrealized loss position at ~~September 30, 2017~~March 31, 2020 (dollars in thousands):



Available-for-sale		Less than 12 months		12 months or longer		Total			Less than 12 months		12 months or longer		Total
	Number of securities	Fair Value	Unrealized losses	Fair Value	Unrealized losses	Fair Value	Unrealized losses	Number of securities	Fair Value	Unrealized losses	Fair Value	Unrealized losses	Fair Value	Unrealized losses
Description of Securities
U.S. Government agency securities	4	$ 17,266	$ (24)	$ -	$ -	$ 17,266	$ (24)	3	$ 2,678	$ (8)	$ 3,852	$ (124)	$ 6,530	$ (132)
Asset-backed securities	16	16,453	(20)	58,961	(419)	75,414	(439)	40	206,017	(12,465)	23,235	(1,324)	229,252	(13,789)
Tax-exempt obligations of states and
political subdivisions	2	-	-	2,148	(17)	2,148	(17)
Taxable obligations of states and
political subdivisions	14	14,844	(127)	977	(23)	15,821	(150)	1	2,498	(4)	-	-	2,498	(4)
Residential mortgage-backed securities	93	173,175	(1,573)	98,021	(1,847)	271,196	(3,420)	38	52,631	(1,240)	25,719	(662)	78,350	(1,902)
Collateralized mortgage obligation securities	26	62,244	(468)	30,937	(455)	93,181	(923)	6	21,012	(662)	12,566	(310)	33,578	(972)
Commercial mortgage-backed securities	8	23,434	(114)	243	-	23,677	(114)	8	125,985	(1,983)	1,101	(8)	127,086	(1,991)
Foreign debt securities	21	15,869	(68)	1,180	(20)	17,049	(88)
Corporate debt securities	20	11,658	(30)	4,514	(35)	16,172	(65)	1	-	-	5,152	(4,848)	5,152	(4,848)
Total temporarily impaired
investment securities	204	$ 334,943	$ (2,424)	$ 196,981	$ (2,816)	$ 531,924	$ (5,240)	97	$ 410,821	$ (16,362)	$ 71,625	$ (7,276)	$ 482,446	$ (23,638)

The table below indicates the length of time individual securities had been in a continuous unrealized loss position at December 31, ~~2016~~2019 (dollars in thousands):



Available-for-sale		Less than 12 months		12 months or longer		Total			Less than 12 months		12 months or longer		Total
	Number of securities	Fair Value	Unrealized losses	Fair Value	Unrealized losses	Fair Value	Unrealized losses	Number of securities	Fair Value	Unrealized losses	Fair Value	Unrealized losses	Fair Value	Unrealized losses
Description of Securities
U.S. Government agency securities	5	$ 7,414	$ (36)	$ 7,824	$ (56)	$ 15,238	$ (92)	5	$ 12,214	$ (44)	$ 3,986	$ (133)	$ 16,200	$ (177)
Asset-backed securities	23	10,186	(49)	93,375	(1,988)	103,561	(2,037)	28	115,909	(275)	56,427	(260)	172,336	(535)
Tax-exempt obligations of states and
political subdivisions	8	6,056	(118)	3,301	(19)	9,357	(137)
Taxable obligations of states and
political subdivisions	27	42,963	(633)	-	-	42,963	(633)
Residential mortgage-backed securities	68	180,357	(4,833)	54,254	(316)	234,611	(5,149)	64	58,682	(114)	73,311	(987)	131,993	(1,101)
Collateralized mortgage obligation securities	28	88,936	(1,004)	30,386	(441)	119,322	(1,445)	22	37,387	(85)	18,136	(123)	55,523	(208)
Commercial mortgage-backed securities	28	79,345	(963)	4,547	(45)	83,892	(1,008)	4	35,095	(129)	3,162	(16)	38,257	(145)
Foreign debt securities	34	26,696	(274)	700	-	27,396	(274)
Corporate debt securities	39	30,418	(414)	645	(4)	31,063	(418)
Total temporarily impaired
investment securities	260	$ 472,371	$ (8,324)	$ 195,032	$ (2,869)	$ 667,403	$ (11,193)	123	$ 259,287	$ (647)	$ 155,022	$ (1,519)	$ 414,309	$ (2,166)



Held-to-maturity		Less than 12 months		12 months or longer		Total			Less than 12 months		12 months or longer		Total
	Number of securities	Fair Value	Unrealized losses	Fair Value	Unrealized losses	Fair Value	Unrealized losses	Number of securities	Fair Value	Unrealized losses	Fair Value	Unrealized losses	Fair Value	Unrealized losses
Description of Securities
Corporate and other debt securities:
Single issuers	1	$ -	$ -	$ 6,039	$ (3,026)	$ 6,039	$ (3,026)	1	$ -	$ -	$ 7,152	$ (2,067)	$ 7,152	$ (2,067)
Total temporarily impaired
investment securities	1	$ -	$ -	$ 6,039	$ (3,026)	$ 6,039	$ (3,026)	1	$ -	$ -	$ 7,152	$ (2,067)	$ 7,152	$ (2,067)

~~Other securities included in the held-to-maturity classification at September 30, 2017 consisted of three securities secured by diversified portfolios of corporate securities and two single-issuer~~The Company owns one single issuer trust preferred ~~securities.~~

~~A total of $11.0 million of other debt securities - single issuers is comprised of the following: amortized cost of the two single-issuer trust preferred securities of $11.0 million, of which one~~ security ~~for $1.9 million was issued by a bank and one security for $9.1 million was~~ issued by an insurance company.

~~A total~~The security is not rated by any bond rating service. At March 31, 2020, it had a book value of ~~$75.4~~$10.0 million and a fair value of ~~other debt securities – pooled is comprised of three securities consisting of diversified portfolios of corporate securities.~~

~~The following table provides additional information related to the Company’s single issuer trust preferred securities as of September 30, 2017 (in thousands):~~

The Company has evaluated the securities in the above tables as of March 31, 2020 and has concluded that none of these securities ~~has impairment that is other-than-temporary.~~required an allowance for credit loss. The Company evaluates whether aan allowance for credit ~~impairment exists~~loss is required by considering primarily the following factors: (a) the length of time and extent to which the fair value has been less than the amortized cost of the security, (b) changes in the financial condition, credit rating and near-term prospects of the issuer, (c) whether the issuer is current on contractually obligated interest and principal payments, (d) changes in the financial condition of the security’s underlying collateral and (e) the payment structure of the security. The Company’s determination of the best estimate of expected future cash flows, which is used to determine the credit loss amount, is a quantitative and qualitative process that incorporates information received from third-party sources along with internal assumptions and judgments regarding the future performance of the security. The Company concluded that most of the securities that are in an unrealized loss position are in a loss position because of changes in market interest rates after the securities were purchased. Securities that have been in an unrealized loss position for 12 months or longer include other securities whose market values are sensitive to market interest rates. The Company’s unrealized loss for other debt securities, which include ~~two~~one single issuer trust preferred ~~securities,~~security, is primarily related to general market conditions, including a lack of liquidity in the market. The severity of the ~~temporary impairments~~impact of fair value in relation to the carrying amounts of the individual investments is consistent with market developments. The Company’s analysis of each investment is performed at the security level. As a result of its review, the Company concluded that ~~other-than-temporary impairment did~~an allowance was not ~~exist due~~required to ~~the Company’s ability and intention to hold these securities to recover their amortized cost basis.~~recognize credit losses.

The Company has several lending lines of business including SBA loans, direct lease financing, SBLOC and IBLOC and other specialty and consumer lending. The Company also originates loans for sale into commercial ~~mortgage backed~~mortgage-backed securitizations or to secondary government guaranteed loan markets. ~~These sales are accounted for as true sales and servicing rights on these loans are not retained. The~~At origination, the Company ~~has~~ elected fair value treatment for these loans held-for-sale to better reflect the economics of the transactions. At ~~September 30, 2017,~~March 31, 2020, the fair value of the loans ~~held for sale~~held-for-sale was ~~$383.0 million~~$1.72 billion and their ~~book value~~amortized cost was ~~$378.2 million.~~$1.72 billion. Included in ~~the gain~~“Net realized and unrealized gains (losses) on ~~sale of~~ loans originated for sale” in the ~~Statements~~consolidated statements of ~~Operations were gains~~operations are changes in the estimate in fair value of unsold loans. For the three months ended March 31, 2020, unrealized losses recognized ~~from~~for such changes in fair value ~~of $1.9 million for~~were $2.9 million. For the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September 30, 2017.~~March 31, 2019, unrealized gains recognized for such changes in fair value were $329,000. There were no changes in fair value related to credit risk. Interest earned on loans ~~held for sale~~held-for-sale during the period held ~~are~~is recorded in Interest Income-Loans, including fees, in the consolidated statements of operations. The Bank also pledged the majority of its loans to the Federal Reserve Bank for a line of credit which it generally has not used. However, in light of the impact of the Coronavirus, the Federal Reserve has encouraged banks to utilize their lines to maximize the amount of funding available for credit markets. Accordingly, the Bank has been borrowing on its line on an overnight basis. The amount of loans pledged varies and the ~~Statements of Operations.~~collateral may be unpledged at any time to the extent the collateral exceeds advances. The line is maintained consistent with the Bank’s liquidity policy which maximizes potential liquidity.

The Company has periodically sponsored the structuring of commercial mortgage loan securitizations. The loans sold to the commercial mortgage-backed securitizations are transitional commercial mortgage loans which are made to improve and rehabilitate existing properties which are already cash flowing. Servicing rights are not retained. Each of the securitizations is considered a variable interest entity of which the Company is not the primary beneficiary. Further, true sale accounting has been applicable to each of the securitizations, as supported by a review performed by an independent third-party consultant. In each of the securitizations, the Company has obtained a tranche of certificates which are accounted for as available-for-sale debt securities. The securities are recorded at fair value at acquisition, which is determined by an independent third party based on the discounted cash flow method using unobservable (level 3) inputs. The loans securitized are structured with some prepayment protection and with extension options which are common for rehabilitation loans. It was expected that those factors would generally offset the impact of prepayments which would therefore not be significant. Accordingly, prepayments on CRE securities were not originally assumed in the first four securitizations. However, as a result of higher than expected prepayments on CRE2, annual prepayments of 15% on CRE5 were assumed, beginning after the first-year anniversary of the CRE5 securitization. For CRE6, there was no premium or discount associated with the tranche purchased and prepayments were accordingly not estimated.

Because of credit enhancements for each security, cash flows were not reduced by expected losses. For each of the securitizations, the Company has recorded a gain which is comprised of (i) the excess of consideration received by the Company in the transaction over the carrying value of the loans at securitization, less related transactions costs incurred; and (ii) the recognition of previously deferred origination and exit fees.

A summary of securitizations and securities obtained from those securitizations for the periods ended March 31, 2020 and 2019 is as follows:

The Company analyzes credit risk prior to making loans on an individual loan basis. The Company considers relevant aspects of the

borrowers’ financial position and cash flow, past borrower performance, management’s knowledge of market conditions, collateral and the ratio of loan amounts to estimated collateral value in making its credit determinations.

Major classifications of loans, excluding loans ~~held for sale,~~held-for-sale, are as follows (in thousands):

* The preceding table shows small business loans (SBL) and SBL held-for-sale at the dates indicated (in thousands). While the majority of SBL are comprised of SBA loans, SBL also includes $20,923,000 of non-SBA loans as of March 31, 2020 and $16,952,000 at December 31, 2019.

** Securities Backed Lines of Credit (SBLOC) are collateralized by marketable securities, while Insurance Backed Lines of Credit (IBLOC) are collateralized by the cash surrender value of insurance policies. At March 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019, respectively, IBLOC loans amounted to $228.8 million and $144.6 million.

*** Included in the table above under other consumer loans are demand deposit overdrafts reclassified as loan balances totaling ~~$7.1 million~~$455,000 and ~~$2.4 million~~$882,000 at ~~September 30, 2017~~March 31, 2020 and December 31, ~~2016,~~2019, respectively. ~~Overdraft~~Estimated overdraft charge-offs and recoveries are reflected in the allowance for ~~loan and lease~~credit losses.

* The following table shows SBA loans and SBA loans held for sale at the dates indicated (in thousands):

The following table provides information about ~~impaired~~ loans individually evaluated for credit loss at ~~September 30, 2017~~March 31, 2020 and December 31, ~~2016~~2019 (in thousands):

The following table summarizes non-accrual loans with and without allowance for credit losses as of the periods indicated (in thousands):

Recorded
investment

Unpaid
principal
balance

Related
allowance

Average
recorded
investment

Interest
income
recognized
September 30, 2017

Without an allowance recorded

SBA non real estate
$                      357

$                      357

$                        -

$                      274

$                           -
SBA commercial mortgage
-

-

-

-

-
Direct lease financing
284

396

-

71

-
Consumer - other
-

-

-

-

-
Consumer - home equity
1,700

1,700

-

1,716

-
With an allowance recorded

-
SBA non real estate
2,288

2,288

1,659

2,534

-
SBA commercial mortgage
1,226

1,226

185

761

-
Direct lease financing
-

-

-

506

-
Consumer - other
-

-

-

18

-
Consumer - home equity
-

-

-

-

-
Total

SBA non real estate
2,645

2,645

1,659

2,808

-

SBA commercial mortgage
1,226

1,226

185

761

-
Direct lease financing
284

396

-

577

-
Consumer - other
-

-

-

18

-
Consumer - home equity
1,700

1,700

-

1,716

-

5,855

5,967

1,844

5,880

-


	March 31, 2020			December 31, 2019
	Non-accrual loans with a related ACL *	Non-accrual loans without a related ACL *	Total non-accrual loans	Total non-accrual loans
SBL non-real estate	$ 3,354	$ 211	$ 3,565	$ 3,693
SBL commercial mortgage	971	76	1,047	1,047
SBL construction	711	-	711	711
Consumer	-	322	322	345
	$ 5,036	$ 609	$ 5,645	$ 5,796

* Allowance for credit losses

The following tables summarize the Company’s non-accrual loans, loans past due 90 days and still accruing and other real estate owned for the periods indicated (the Company had no non-accrual leases at ~~September 30, 2017~~March 31, 2020 or December 31, ~~2016)~~2019) (in thousands):



	September 30,	December 31,	March 31,	December 31,
	2017	2016	2020	2019

Non-accrual loans
SBA non real estate	$ 2,310	$ 1,530
SBA commercial mortgage	1,226	-
SBL non-real estate			$ 3,565	$ 3,693
SBL commercial mortgage			1,047	1,047
SBL construction			711	711
Consumer	1,417	1,442	322	345
Total non-accrual loans	4,953	2,972	5,645	5,796

Loans past due 90 days or more	354	661
Loans past due 90 days or more and still accruing			2,245	3,264
Total non-performing loans	5,307	3,633	7,890	9,060
Other real estate owned	-	104	-	-
Total non-performing assets	$ 5,307	$ 3,737	$ 7,890	$ 9,060

Interest which would have been earned on loans classified as non-accrual for the three months ended March 31, 2020 and 2019, was $103,000 and $127,000, respectively. No income on non-accrual loans was recognized during the three months ended March 31, 2020.

In the three months ended March 31, 2020 a total of $134,000 was reversed from interest income, which represented interest accrued on loans placed into non-accrual status during that period.

The Company’s loans that were modified as of ~~September 30, 2017~~March 31, 2020 and December 31, ~~2016~~2019 and considered troubled debt restructurings are as follows (dollars in thousands):



	September 30, 2017			December 31, 2016			March 31, 2020			December 31, 2019
	Number	Pre-modification recorded investment	Post-modification recorded investment	Number	Pre-modification recorded investment	Post-modification recorded investment	Number	Pre-modification recorded investment	Post-modification recorded investment	Number	Pre-modification recorded investment	Post-modification recorded investment
SBA non real estate	4	$ 1,013	$ 1,013	2	$ 844	$ 844
SBL non-real estate							8	$ 1,296	$ 1,296	8	$ 1,309	$ 1,309
Direct lease financing	1	285	285	1	734	734	2	15,620	15,620	1	286	286
Consumer	2	541	541	1	288	288	2	484	484	2	489	489
Total	7	$ 1,839	$ 1,839	4	$ 1,866	$ 1,866	12	$ 17,400	$ 17,400	11	$ 2,084	$ 2,084

The balances below provide information as to how the loans were modified as troubled debt ~~restructurings~~restructuring loans as of ~~September 30, 2017~~March 31, 2020 and December 31, ~~2016~~2019 (in thousands):

~~The following table summarizes, as~~As of ~~September 30, 2017,~~March 31, 2020, the Company had no troubled debt restructured loans that had been restructured within the last 12 months that have subsequently defaulted.

~~As of September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, the~~The Company had no commitments to ~~lend~~extend additional credit to loans classified as troubled debt restructurings as of March 31, 2020.

When loans are classified as troubled debt restructurings, their collateral is valued and a specific reserve is established if the collateral valuation, less deposition costs, is lower than the recorded value of the loan. As of March 31, 2020, there were 12 troubled debt restructured loans with a balance of $17.4 million which had specific reserves of $1.0 million. Approximately $1.0 million of these reserves related to the non-guaranteed portion of SBA loans for start-up businesses with the balance attributable to direct lease financing.

Effective in the first quarter of 2020 current expected credit loss accounting replaced the prior incurred loss model that recognized losses when it became probable that a credit loss would be incurred, with a new requirement to recognize lifetime expected credit losses immediately when a financial asset is originated or purchased. The allowance for credit losses is a valuation account that is deducted from the amortized cost basis of loans to present the net amount expected to be collected on the loans. Loans, or portions thereof, are charged off against the allowance when they are deemed uncollectible. Loans are deemed uncollectible based on individual facts and circumstances including the quality of repayment sources, the length of collection efforts and the probability and timing of recoveries . During the first quarter of 2020, upon adoption of the guidance, the allowance for credit losses was increased by $2.6 million. Additionally, $569,000 was established as an allowance for off-balance sheet credit losses (for unfunded loan commitments) and recorded in other liabilities. These amounts did not impact the Consolidated Statement of Operations, as the guidance required these cumulative differences between the two accounting conventions to flow through retained earnings, net of their income tax benefit. The following table shows the effect of the adoption of CECL as of January 1, 2020 and the March 31, 2020 allowance for credit loss (in thousands).

(1) Included in other specialty lending are $36.4 million of SBA loans purchased for CRA purposes. These loans are classified as SBL loans in our loan tables.

Management estimates the allowance using relevant available internal and external historical loan performance information, current economic conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts. Historical credit loss experience provides the initial basis for the estimation of expected credit losses over the lifetime of loans. Adjustments to historical loss information are made for differences in current loan-specific risk characteristics such as differences in underwriting standards, portfolio mix, credit quality, or term as well as for changes in economic conditions.

The methodology used in the estimation of the allowance, which is performed at least quarterly, is designed to be responsive to changes in portfolio credit quality and the impact of current and future economic conditions on loan performance. The review of the appropriateness of the allowance is performed by the Chief Credit Officer and presented to the audit committee for their review. The allowance for credit losses is comprised of reserves, based on loan pools with similar risk characteristics based on a lifetime loss-rate model. Loans that do not share risk characteristics are evaluated on an individual basis. If foreclosure is believed to be probable or repayment is expected from the sale of the collateral. Expected credit losses are based on the difference between loan principal and the estimated fair value of the collateral, adjusted for disposition costs as appropriate.

For purposes of determining the pool-basis reserve, the loans not assigned an individual reserve are segregated by product type, to recognize differing risk profiles within portfolio segments. A historical loss rate is calculated for each product type based upon historical net charge-offs for that product. The loss rate is projected over the estimated remaining loan lives to determine estimated lifetime losses. Additionally we add to the allowance a component for each pool based upon qualitative factors such as the Company’s current loan performance statistics as determined by pool. A similar process is employed to calculate a reserve assigned to off-balance sheet commitments, which are comprised of unfunded loan commitments and letters of credit. That reserve is recorded in other liabilities. The qualitative factors are intended to address factors that may not be reflected in historical loss rates and otherwise unaccounted for in the quantitative process. For periods beyond which we are able to develop reasonable and supportable forecasts, our model reverts to the historical loss rate. Even though portions of the allowance may be allocated to specific loans, the entire allowance is available for any credit that, in management’s judgment, should be charged off.

The Company ranks its qualitative factors in five levels: minimal risk, low, moderate, moderate-high and high. When the Company adopted CECL as of January 1, 2020, the management assumption was that some degree of economic slowdown should be considered over the next eighteen months. That belief reflected the length of the current economic expansion and the relatively high level of unsustainable deficit spending. Accordingly, certain of the Company’s qualitative factors were set at moderate as of January 1, 2020. Based on the uncertainty as to how the Coronavirus would impact the Company’s loan pools, the Company increased other economic qualitative factors to moderate at March 31, 2020. These changes increased the first quarter 2020 provision for credit losses by approximately $849,000.

Below are the portfolio segments used to pool loans with similar risk characteristics and align with our methodology for measuring expected credit losses. A summary of our primary portfolio pools is as follows:


As of March 31, 2020	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	Prior	Revolving loans at amortized cost	Total
SBL non real estate
Non-rated	$ 1,936	$ -	$ -	$ -	$ -	$ -	$ -	$ 1,936
Pass (I-IV)	2,202	9,430	12,922	7,262	8,134	12,657	-	52,607
Special mention	-	-	1,193	44	541	985	-	2,763
Substandard	-	49	-	761	2,053	1,845	-	4,708
Total SBL non-real estate	4,138	9,479	14,115	8,067	10,728	15,487	-	62,014

SBL commercial mortgage
Non-rated	2,529	-	-	-	-	-	-	2,529
Pass (I-IV)	8,313	58,092	40,063	35,014	29,028	38,929	-	209,439
Special mention	-	-	-	-	-	264	-	264
Substandard	-	-	-	-	76	7,441	-	7,517
Total SBL commercial mortgage	10,842	58,092	40,063	35,014	29,104	46,634	-	219,749

SBL construction
Non-rated	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Pass (I-IV)	-	13,148	23,603	8,425	2,936	-	-	48,112
Special mention	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Substandard	-	-	-	-	711	-	-	711
Total SBL construction	-	13,148	23,603	8,425	3,647	-	-	48,823

Direct lease financing
Non-rated	15,021	1,549	556	-	-	-	-	17,126
Pass (I-IV)	60,757	161,908	92,587	56,292	26,452	8,748	-	406,744
Special mention	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Substandard	-	15,641	2,664	1,848	1,680	264	-	22,097
Total direct lease financing	75,778	179,098	95,807	58,140	28,132	9,012	-	445,967

SBLOC
Non-rated	-	-	-	-	-	-	14,819	14,819
Pass (I-IV)	-	-	-	-	-	-	912,794	912,794
Special mention	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Substandard	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Total SBLOC	-	-	-	-	-	-	927,613	927,613

IBLOC
Non-rated	-	-	-	-	-	-	55,921	55,921
Pass (I-IV)	-	-	-	-	-	-	172,899	172,899
Special mention	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Substandard	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Total IBLOC	-	-	-	-	-	-	228,820	228,820

Other specialty
Non-rated	-	194	283	649	-	-	-	1,126
Pass (I-IV)	-	3,559	6,824	6,720	7,424	13,462	-	37,989
Special mention	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Substandard	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Total other specialty	-	3,753	7,107	7,369	7,424	13,462	-	39,115

Consumer
Non-rated	-	-	-	17	-	229	1,970	2,216
Pass (I-IV)	-	-	-	-	-	-	1,485	1,485
Special mention	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Substandard	-	-	-	-	-	-	322	322
Total consumer	-	-	-	17	-	229	3,777	4,023
Total	$ 90,758	$ 263,570	$ 180,695	$ 117,032	$ 79,035	$ 84,824	$ 1,160,210	$ 1,976,124

SBL. Substantially all of our SBL or small business loans consist of SBA loans. We participate in two loan programs established by the SBA: the 7(a) Loan Guarantee Program and the 504 Fixed Asset Financing Program. The 7(a) Loan Guarantee Program is designed to help small business borrowers start or expand their businesses by providing partial guarantees of loans made by banks and non-bank lending institutions for specific business purposes, including long or short term working capital; funds for the purchase of equipment, machinery, supplies and materials; funds for the purchase, construction or renovation of real estate; and funds to acquire, operate or expand an existing business or refinance existing debt, all under conditions established by the SBA. The 504 Fixed Asset Financing Program includes the financing of real estate and commercial mortgages. We segment the SBL portfolio into three pools: non real estate, commercial mortgage and construction to capture the risk characteristics of each pool. The qualitive factors for SBL loans focus on pool loan ~~customers whose~~performance, underlying collateral for collateral dependent loans and changes in economic conditions. Additionally, the construction segment adds a qualitative factor for general construction risk.

Direct lease financing. We provide lease financing for commercial and government vehicle fleets and, to a lesser extent, provide lease financing for other equipment. Our leases are either open-end or closed-end. An open-end lease is one in which, at the end of the lease term, the lessee must pay us the difference between the amount at which we sell the leased asset and the stated termination value. Termination value is a contractual value agreed to by the parties at the inception of a lease as to the value of the leased asset at the end of the lease term. A closed-end lease is one for which no such payment is due on lease termination. In a closed-end lease, the risk that the amount received on a sale of the leased asset will be less than the residual value is assumed by us, as lessor. The qualitative factors for all direct lease financing focus on underlying collateral for collateral dependent loans, portfolio loan ~~terms~~performance, concentrations and changes in economic conditions.

SBLOC. Our SBLOC loans to individuals, trusts and entities are secured by a pledge of marketable securities maintained in one or more accounts with respect to which we obtain a securities account control agreement. The securities pledged may be either debt or equity securities or a combination thereof, but all such securities must be listed for trading on a national securities exchange or automated inter-dealer quotation system. SBLOCs are typically payable on demand. Maximum SBLOC line amounts are calculated by applying a standard ‘advance rate’ calculation against the eligible security type depending on asset class: typically up to 50% for equity securities and mutual fund securities and 80% for investment grade (Standard & Poor’s rating of BBB- or higher, or Moody’s rating of Baa3 or higher) municipal or corporate debt securities. Substantially all SBLOCs have full recourse to the borrower. The underlying securities collateral for our SBLOC loans are monitored on a daily basis to confirm the composition of the client portfolio and its daily market value. The primary qualitative factor in the SBLOC analysis is the ratio of loans outstanding to market value. This factor has been ~~modified~~maintained at low levels, as no losses were incurred during the first quarter of 2020, notwithstanding historic declines in ~~troubled debt restructurings.~~equity markets. Additionally, the advance rates noted above were set to anticipate even higher potential market declines in the future.

IBLOC. Our IBLOC loans are collateralized by the cash surrender value of insurance policies. Should a loan default, the primary risks for IBLOCs are if the insurance company issuing the policy were to become insolvent, or if that company would fail to recognize the Bank’s assignment of policy proceeds. To mitigate these risks, insurance company ratings are periodically evaluated for compliance with Bank standards. Additionally, the Bank utilizes assignments of cash surrender value which legal counsel has concluded are enforceable. The qualitative factors for IBLOC primarily focus on the concentration risk with insurance companies, should they err in their procedures.

Other Specialty Lending and consumer loans. Our other specialty lending loans and consumer loans are legacy loans related to our discontinued operation. The loans primarily are consumer loans and home equity loans. The qualitative factors for all other specialty lending and consumer loans focus on changes in the underlying collateral for collateral dependent loans, portfolio loan performance, concentrations and changes in economic conditions.

Expected credit losses are estimated over the estimated remaining lives of loans. The estimate excludes possible extensions, renewals and modifications unless either of the following applies: management has a reasonable expectation that a loan will be restructured, or the extension or renewal options are included in the borrower contract and are not unconditionally cancellable by us.

We do not measure an allowance for credit losses on accrued interest receivable balances because these balances are written off in a timely manner as a reduction to interest income when loans are placed on non-accrual status.

Allowance for Credit Losses on Off-Balance Sheet Credit Exposures. The Company estimates expected credit losses over the contractual period in which the Company is exposed to credit risk via a contractual obligation to extend credit, unless that obligation is unconditionally cancellable by the Company. The allowance for credit losses on off-balance sheet credit exposures is adjusted through the provision for credit losses. The estimate considers the likelihood that funding will occur over the estimated life of the commitment. The amount of the allowance in the liability account as of March 31, 2020 was $786,000.

A detail of the changes in the allowance for ~~loan and lease~~credit losses by loan category and summary of loans evaluated individually and collectively for impairment is as follows (in thousands):



	SBA non real estate	SBA commercial mortgage	SBA construction	Direct lease financing	SBLOC	Other specialty lending	Other consumer loans	Unallocated	Total	March 31, 2020
September 30, 2017
Beginning balance	$ 1,976	$ 737	$ 76	$ 1,994	$ 315	$ 32	$ 975	$ 227	$ 6,332
										SBL non-real estate	SBL commercial mortgage	SBL construction	Direct lease financing	SBLOC / IBLOC	Other specialty lending	Other consumer loans	Unallocated	Total
Beginning 12/31/2019										$ 4,985	$ 1,472	$ 432	$ 2,426	$ 553	$ 12	$ 40	$ 318	$ 10,238
1/1 CECL adjustment										(220)	537	139	2,362	(41)	158	20	(318)	2,637
Charge-offs	(343)	-	-	(780)	-	-	(113)	-	(1,236)	(265)	-	-	(1,193)	-	-	-	-	(1,458)
Recoveries	13	-	-	-	-	-	24	-	37	19	-	-	84	-	-	-	-	103
Provision (credit)	1,576	521	22	196	45	36	(220)	(26)	2,150	422	798	224	1,879	64	(13)	(11)	-	3,363
Ending balance	$ 3,222	$ 1,258	$ 98	$ 1,410	$ 360	$ 68	$ 666	$ 201	$ 7,283	$ 4,941	$ 2,807	$ 795	$ 5,558	$ 576	$ 157	$ 49	$ -	$ 14,883

Ending balance: Individually evaluated for impairment	$ 1,659	$ 185	$ -	$ -	$ -	$ -	$ -	$ -	$ 1,844
Ending balance: Individually evaluated for expected credit loss										$ 2,805	$ 136	$ 26	$ -	$ -	$ -	$ -	$ -	$ 2,967

Ending balance: Collectively evaluated for impairment	$ 1,563	$ 1,073	$ 98	$ 1,410	$ 360	$ 68	$ 666	$ 201	$ 5,439
Ending balance: Collectively evaluated for expected credit loss										$ 2,136	$ 2,671	$ 769	$ 5,558	$ 576	$ 157	$ 49	$ -	$ 11,916

Loans:
Ending balance	$ 72,055	$ 132,997	$ 14,205	$ 369,069	$ 720,279	$ 36,664	$ 20,107	$ 8,684	$ 1,374,060	$ 84,946	$ 233,220	$ 48,823	$ 445,967	$ 1,156,433	$ 2,711	$ 4,023	$ 9,632	$ 1,985,755

Ending balance: Individually evaluated for expected credit loss										$ 3,997	$ 1,047	$ 711	$ 15,620	$ -	$ -	$ 585	$ -	$ 21,960

Ending balance: Collectively evaluated for expected credit loss										$ 80,949	$ 232,173	$ 48,112	$ 430,347	$ 1,156,433	$ 2,711	$ 3,438	$ 9,632	$ 1,963,795



	December 31, 2019
	SBL non-real estate	SBL commercial mortgage	SBL construction	Direct lease financing	SBLOC / IBLOC	Other specialty lending	Other consumer loans	Unallocated	Total
Beginning 1/1/2019	$ 4,636	$ 941	$ 250	$ 2,025	$ 393	$ 60	$ ��108	$ 240	$ 8,653
Charge-offs	(1,362)	-	-	(528)	-	-	(1,103)	-	(2,993)
Recoveries	125	-	-	51	-	-	2	-	178
Provision (credit)	1,586	531	182	878	160	(48)	1,033	78	4,400
Ending balance	$ 4,985	$ 1,472	$ 432	$ 2,426	$ 553	$ 12	$ 40	$ 318	$ 10,238

Ending balance: Individually evaluated for impairment	$ 2,961	$ 136	$ 36	$ -	$ -	$ -	$ 9	$ -	$ 3,142

Ending balance: Collectively evaluated for impairment	$ 2,024	$ 1,336	$ 396	$ 2,426	$ 553	$ 12	$ 31	$ 318	$ 7,096

Loans:
Ending balance	$ 84,579	$ 218,110	$ 45,310	$ 434,460	$ 1,024,420	$ 3,055	$ 4,554	$ 9,757	$ 1,824,245

Ending balance: Individually evaluated for impairment	$ 4,139	$ 1,047	$ 711	$ 286	$ -	$ -	$ 610	$ -	$ 6,793

2126

Ending balance: Individually evaluated for impairment

$              2,645

$              1,226

$                      -

$                284

$                   -

$                 -

$           1,700

$                      -

$                5,855

Ending balance: Collectively evaluated for impairment

$            69,410

$          131,771

$            14,205

$         368,785

$       720,279

$        36,664

$         18,407

$              8,684

$         1,368,205

Ending balance: Collectively evaluated for impairment

$ 80,440

$ 217,063

$ 44,599

$ 434,174

$ 1,024,420

$ 3,055

$ 3,944

$ 9,757

$ 1,817,452

December 31, 2016

Beginning balance

$                844

$                408

$                  48

$             1,022

$              762

$              199

$              936

$                181

$                4,400
Charge-offs

(128)

-

-

(119)

-

-

(1,211)

-

(1,458)
Recoveries

1

-

-

17

12

-

30
Provision (credit)

1,259

329

28

1,074

(447)

(167)

1,238

46

3,360
Ending balance

$             1,976

$                737

$                  76

$             1,994

$              315

$                32

$              975

$                227

$                6,332

Ending balance: Individually evaluated for impairment

$                938

$                     -

$                     -

$                216

$                   -

$                  -

$                   -

$                     -

$                1,154

Ending balance: Collectively evaluated for impairment

$             1,038

$                737

$                  76

$             1,778

$              315

$                32

$              975

$                227

$                5,178

Loans:

Ending balance

$           74,644

$         126,159

$             8,826

$         346,645

$       630,400

$         11,073

$         17,374

$             7,790

$         1,222,911

Ending balance: Individually evaluated for impairment

$             2,374

$                     -

$                     -

$                734

$                   -

$                  -

$           1,730

$                     -

$                4,838

Ending balance: Collectively evaluated for impairment

$           72,270

$         126,159

$             8,826

$         345,911

$       630,400

$         11,073

$         15,644

$             7,790

$         1,218,073



September 30, 2016
Beginning balance	$ 844	$ 408	$ 48	$ 1,022	$ 762	$ 199	$ 936	$ 181	4,400
										March 31, 2019
										SBL non-real estate	SBL commercial mortgage	SBL construction	Direct lease financing	SBLOC	Other specialty lending	Other consumer loans	Unallocated	Total
Beginning 1/1/2019										$ 4,636	$ 941	$ 250	$ 2,025	$ 393	$ 60	$ 108	$ 240	$ 8,653
Charge-offs	(76)	-	-	(63)	-	-	(39)	-	(178)	(322)	-	-	(106)	-	-	-	-	(428)
Recoveries	1	-	-	18	-	-	7	-	26	17	-	-	12	-	-	-	-	29
Provision (credit)	1,179	343	7	568	(451)	(143)	176	131	1,810	846	538	(15)	362	3	22	(29)	(27)	1,700
Ending balance	$ 1,948	$ 751	$ 55	$ 1,545	$ 311	$ 56	$ 1,080	$ 312	$ 6,058	$ 5,177	$ 1,479	$ 235	$ 2,293	$ 396	$ 82	$ 79	$ 213	$ 9,954

Ending balance: Individually evaluated for impairment	$ 939	$ -	$ -	$ -	$ -	$ -	$ 474	$ -	$ 1,413	$ 3,324	$ 71	$ -	$ 151	$ -	$ -	$ 15	$ -	$ 3,561

Ending balance: Collectively evaluated for impairment	$ 1,009	$ 751	$ 55	$ 1,545	$ 311	$ 56	$ 606	$ 312	$ 4,645	$ 1,853	$ 1,408	$ 235	$ 2,142	$ 396	$ 82	$ 64	$ 213	$ 6,393

Loans:
Ending balance	$ 74,262	$ 117,053	$ 6,317	$ 332,632	$ 621,456	$ 20,076	$ 19,375	$ 7,066	$ 1,198,237	$ 76,112	$ 179,397	$ 23,979	$ 384,930	$ 791,986	$ 34,425	$ 9,301	$ 10,265	$ 1,510,395

Ending balance: Individually evaluated for impairment	$ 2,774	$ -	$ -	$ -	$ -	$ -	$ 2,707	$ -	$ 5,481	$ 4,614	$ 458	$ 711	$ 812	$ -	$ -	$ 1,732	$ -	$ 8,327

Ending balance: Collectively evaluated for impairment	$ 71,488	$ 117,053	$ 6,317	$ 332,632	$ 621,456	$ 20,076	$ 16,668	$ 7,066	$ 1,192,756	$ 71,498	$ 178,939	$ 23,268	$ 384,118	$ 791,986	$ 34,425	$ 7,569	$ 10,265	$ 1,502,068

The Company did not have loans acquired with deteriorated credit quality at either ~~September 30, 2017~~March 31, 2020 or December 31, ~~2016.~~2019.

A detail of the Company’s delinquent loans by loan category is as follows (in thousands):



	30-59 Days	60-89 Days	90 Days		Total		Total	March 31, 2020
December 31, 2016	past due	past due	or greater	Non-accrual	past due	Current	loans
SBA non real estate	$ 559	$ -	$ -	$ 1,530	$ 2,089	$ 72,555	$ 74,644
SBA commercial mortgage	-	-	-	-	-	126,159	126,159
SBA construction	-	-	-	-	-	8,826	8,826
								30-59 Days	60-89 Days	90+ Days		Total		Total
								past due	past due	still accruing	Non-accrual	past due	Current	loans
SBL non-real estate								$ 185	$ 406	$ -	$ 3,565	$ 4,156	$ 80,790	$ 84,946
SBL commercial mortgage								-	-	-	1,047	1,047	232,173	233,220
SBL construction								-	-	-	711	711	48,112	48,823
Direct lease financing	11,856	1,998	661	-	14,515	332,130	346,645	9,079	1,459	2,245	-	12,783	433,184	445,967
SBLOC	-	-	-	-	-	630,400	630,400
SBLOC / IBLOC								10,835	-	-	-	10,835	1,145,598	1,156,433
Other specialty lending	-	-	-	-	-	11,073	11,073	-	-	-	-	-	2,711	2,711
Consumer - other	-	-	-	-	-	5,403	5,403	17	-	-	-	17	684	701
Consumer - home equity	155	-	-	1,442	1,597	10,374	11,971	-	-	-	322	322	3,000	3,322
Unamortized loan fees and costs	-	-	-	-	-	7,790	7,790	-	-	-	-	-	9,632	9,632
	$ 12,570	$ 1,998	$ 661	$ 2,972	$ 18,201	$ 1,204,710	$ 1,222,911	$ 20,116	$ 1,865	$ 2,245	$ 5,645	$ 29,871	$ 1,955,884	$ 1,985,755

The Company evaluates its loans under an internal loan risk rating system as a means of identifying problem loans. The special mention classification indicates weaknesses that may, if not cured, threaten the borrower’s future repayment ability. A substandard classification reflects an existing weakness indicating the possible inadequacy of net worth and other repayment sources. These classifications are used both by regulators and peers as they have been correlated with an increased probability of credit losses. The following table provides information by credit risk rating indicator for each segment of the loan portfolio, excluding loans ~~held for sale,~~held-for-sale, at ~~the dates indicated~~December 31, 2019 (in thousands):

September 30, 2017

Pass

Special mention

Substandard

Doubtful

Loss

Unrated subject to review *

Unrated not subject to review *

Total loans
SBA non real estate

$           44,996

$            3,981

$            4,107

$                   -

$                    -

$                        -

$                 18,971

$              72,055
SBA commercial mortgage

110,059

279

1,226

-

-

2,163

19,270

132,997
SBA construction

14,205

-

-

-

-

-

-

14,205
Direct lease financing

193,792

-

2,770

-

-

8,733

163,774

369,069
SBLOC

357,906

-

-

-

-

-

362,373

720,279
Other specialty lending

36,664

-

-

-

-

-

-

36,664
Consumer

8,791

283

1,885

-

-

-

9,148

20,107
Unamortized loan fees and costs

-

-

-

-

-

-

8,684

8,684

$         766,413

$            4,543

$            9,988

$                   -

$                    -

$              10,896

$               582,220

$         1,374,060

December 31, 2016

SBA non real estate

$           51,437

$            2,723

$            3,628

$                   -

$                    -

$                        -

$                 16,856

$              74,644
SBA commercial mortgage

92,485

-

-

-

-

15,164

18,510

126,159
SBA construction

8,060

-

-

-

-

-

766

8,826
Direct lease financing

122,571

-

3,736

-

-

30,881

189,457

346,645
SBLOC

277,489

-

-

-

-

-

352,911

630,400
Other specialty lending

11,073

-

-

-

-

-

-

11,073
Consumer

9,837

288

2,312

-

-

-

4,937

17,374
Unamortized loan fees and costs

-

-

-

-

-

-

7,790

7,790

$         572,952

$            3,011

$            9,676

$                   -

$                    -

$              46,045

$               591,227

$         1,222,911



	December 31, 2019
	Pass	Special mention	Substandard	Doubtful	Loss	Unrated subject to review *	Unrated not subject to review *	Total loans
SBL non-real estate	$ 76,108	$ 3,045	$ 4,430	$ -	$ -	$ -	$ 996	$ 84,579
SBL commercial mortgage	208,809	2,249	5,577	-	-	-	1,475	218,110
SBL construction	44,599	-	711	-	-	-	-	45,310
Direct lease financing	420,289	-	8,792	-	-	-	5,379	434,460
SBLOC / IBLOC	942,858	-	-	-	-	-	81,562	1,024,420
Other specialty lending	3,055	-	-	-	-	-	-	3,055
Consumer	2,545	-	345	-	-	-	1,664	4,554
Unamortized loan fees and costs	-	-	-	-	-	-	9,757	9,757
	$ 1,698,263	$ 5,294	$ 19,855	$ -	$ -	$ -	$ 100,833	$ 1,824,245

* For information on targeted loan review thresholds see “Allowance for Loan Losses” in the 2019 Form 10-K Report in the loans footnote and in this Form 10-Q in the Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

The Bank ~~maintains~~maintained no deposits for various affiliated companies ~~totaling approximately $3.5 million and $5.5 million~~ as of ~~September 30, 2017~~March 31, 2020 and December 31, ~~2016,~~2019, respectively.

The Bank has entered into lending transactions in the ordinary course of business with directors, executive officers, principal stockholders and affiliates of such persons.All loans were made on substantially the same terms, including interest rate and collateral, as those prevailing at the time for comparable loans with persons not related to the ~~Bank.~~lender. At ~~September 30, 2017,~~March 31, 2020, these loans were current as to principal and interest payments and did not involve more than normal risk of collectability. Loans to these related parties ~~included in Loans, net of deferred loan fees and costs,~~ amounted to ~~$1.4~~$2.7 million and $2.3 million at ~~September 30, 2017~~March 31, 2020 and ~~$649,000 at~~ December 31, ~~2016.~~2019, respectively.

The Bank periodically purchases securities under agreements to resell and ~~engages~~engaged in other securities ~~transactions as follows. The Company executed~~ transactions through J.V.B. Financial Group, LLC, (JVB), a broker dealer in which the Company’s Chairman is a registered representative and has a minority interest. The Company’s Chairman also serves as ~~Vice Chairman~~the President, a director and the Chief Investment Officer of Cohen & Company Financial Limited (formerly Euro Dekania Management Ltd.), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Cohen & Company Inc. (formerly Institutional Financial Markets Inc.), the parent company of JVB. In ~~2017,~~the first quarter of 2020, the Company purchased ~~$2.8 million of government guaranteed SBA loans~~no securities from ~~JVB~~JVB. Prices for ~~Community Reinvestment Act purposes.~~these securities are verified to market rates and no separate commissions or fees are paid to that firm. The Company ~~also~~has historically purchased securities under agreements to resell through JVB primarily consisting of ~~G.N.M.A.~~Government National Mortgage Association certificates which are full faith and credit obligations of the United States government issued at competitive rates. JVB was in compliance with all of the terms of the agreements at ~~September 30, 2017~~March 31, 2020 and had complied with all terms for all prior repurchase agreements. There were ~~$65.1 million and $39.2 million of~~no repurchase agreements with J.V.B. outstanding at ~~September 30, 2017~~March 31, 2020 and December 31, ~~2016,~~2019, respectively.

Mr. Hersh Kozlov, a director of the Company, is a partner at Duane Morris LLP, an international law firm. The Company paid Duane Morris LLP ~~$2.5 million~~$25,000 and ~~$2.4 million~~$480,000 for legal services for the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September 30, 2017~~March 31, 2020 and ~~September 30, 2016,~~2019, respectively.

ASC 825, ~~“ Financial Instruments Available for Sale”~~“Financial Instruments”, requires disclosure of the estimated fair value of an entity’s assets and liabilities considered to be financial instruments. For the Company, as for most financial institutions, the majority of its assets and liabilities are considered to be financial instruments. However, many such instruments lack an available trading market as characterized by a willing

buyer and willing seller engaging in an exchange transaction. Accordingly, estimated fair values are determined by the Company using the best available data and an estimation methodology it believes to be suitable for each category of financial instruments. Also, it is the Company’s general practice and intent to hold its financial instruments to maturity whether or not categorized as “available-for-sale” and not to engage in trading or sales activities, except for the sale of commercial loans to secondary markets. For fair value disclosure purposes, the Company utilized certain value measurement criteria required under ~~the~~ ASC 820, “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures”, ~~and~~as discussed below.

~~Estimated fair values have been determined by the Company using the best available data and an estimation methodology it believes to be suitable for each category of financial instruments.~~ Changes in the assumptions or methodologies used to estimate fair values may materially affect the estimated amounts. Also, there may not be reasonable comparability between institutions due to the wide range of permitted assumptions and methodologies in the absence of active markets. This lack of uniformity gives rise to a high degree of subjectivity in estimating financial instrument fair values.

Cash and cash equivalents, which are comprised of cash and due from banks, the Company’s balance at the Federal Reserve Bank and securities purchased under agreements to resell, had recorded values of ~~$398.9~~$119.6 million and ~~$999.1~~$944.5 million as of ~~September 30, 2017~~March 31, 2020 and December 31, ~~2016,~~2019, respectively, which approximated fair values.

The estimated fair values of investment securities are based on quoted market prices, if available, or estimated using a methodology based on management’s inputs. The fair values of the Company’s investment securities held-to-maturity and loans held for sale are based on using “unobservable inputs” that are the best information available in the circumstances. Level 3 investment ~~securities~~security fair values are based on the present value of cash flows, which discounts expected cash flows from principal and interest using yield to maturity at the measurement date. In the first quarter of 2020 and 2019, there were no transfers between the three levels.

FHLB and Atlantic Central Bankers Bank stock is held as required by those respective institutions and is carried at cost. Federal law requires a member institution of the FHLB to hold stock according to predetermined formulas. Atlantic Central Bankers Bank requires its correspondent banking institutions to hold stock as a condition of membership.

Commercial loans ~~held for sale~~held-for-sale generally have estimated fair values based upon ~~either~~ market indications of the sales price of such loans from recent sales ~~transactions or discounted~~transactions. If such information is not available, fair values reflect cash flow ~~analysis.~~analysis based upon pricing for similar loans.

The net loan portfolio ~~at September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 has been~~is valued using the present value of discounted cash flow where market prices were not available. The discount rate used in these calculations is the estimated current market rate adjusted for credit risk. Accrued interest receivable has a carrying value that approximates fair value.

On December 30, 2014, the Bank entered into an agreement for, and closed on, the sale of a portion of its discontinued commercial loan portfolio. The purchaser of the loan portfolio was a newly formed entity, 2014-1 LLC (Walnut Street). The price paid to the Bank for the loan portfolio which had a face value of approximately $267.6 million, was approximately $209.6 million, of which approximately $193.6 million was in the form of two notes issued by Walnut Street to the Bank; a senior note in the principal amount of approximately $178.2 million bearing interest at 1.5% per year and maturing in December 2024 and a subordinate note in the principal amount of approximately $15.4 million, bearing interest at 10.0% per year and maturing in December 2024. The balance of these notes comprises the balance of the investment in unconsolidated ~~entity.~~entity on the consolidated balance sheets, which is measured at fair value at each balance sheet date. The fair value was initially established by the sales price and ~~subsequently subjected~~the investment is marked quarterly to fair value, as determined using a discounted cash flow analysis. The change in value of investment in unconsolidated entity in the ~~income statement includes interest paid and~~consolidated statements of operations reflects changes in estimated fair value. Interest paid to the bank on the notes is credited to principal.

~~Discontinued assets held for sale as of September 30, 2017~~Assets held-for-sale from discontinued operations are ~~held~~recorded at the lower of cost basis or market value. For loans, market value was determined using the ~~income~~discounted cash flow approach which converts expected cash flows from the loan portfolio by unit of measurement to a present value estimate. Unit of measurement was determined by loan type and for significant loans on an individual loan basis. The fair values of the Company’s loans classified as assets ~~held for sale~~held-for-sale are based on “unobservable inputs” that are ~~the best information~~based on available ~~in the circumstances.~~information. Level 3 fair values are based on the present value of cash flows by unit of measurement. For commercial loans other than SBA loans, a market adjusted rate to discount expected cash flows from outstanding principal and interest to expected maturity at the measurement date was utilized. For SBA loans, market indications for similar loans were utilized on a pooled basis. For other real estate owned, market value was based upon appraisals of the underlying collateral by ~~third party~~third-party appraisers, reduced by 7% to 10% for estimated selling costs.

The estimated fair values of demand deposits ~~(comprising~~(comprised of interest and non-interest bearing checking accounts, savings accounts, and certain types of money market accounts) are equal to the amount payable on demand at the reporting date (generally, their carrying amounts). The fair values of securities sold under agreements to repurchase and ~~short term~~short-term borrowings are equal to their carrying amounts as they are ~~short term~~short-term borrowings.

Time deposits, when outstanding, and subordinated debentures have a fair value estimated using a discounted cash flow calculation that applies current interest rates to discount expected cash flows. ~~Based upon time deposit maturities at September 30, 2017, the carrying values approximate their fair values.~~ The carrying amount of accrued interest payable approximates its fair value.

Long term borrowings resulted from sold loans which did not qualify for true sale accounting. They are presented in the amount of the principal of such loans.

The fair values of interest rate swaps, recorded as part of other assets, are determined using models that use readily observable market inputs and a market standard methodology applied to the contractual terms of the derivatives, including the period to maturity and interest rate indices.

The fair value of commitments to extend credit is estimated based on the amount of unamortized deferred loan commitment fees. The fair value of letters of credit is based on the amount of unearned fees plus the estimated cost to terminate the letters of credit. Fair values of unrecognized financial instruments, including commitments to extend credit, and the fair value of letters of credit are considered immaterial.

The following tables provide information regarding carrying amounts and estimated fair values (in ~~thousands~~):

September 30, 2017

Quoted prices in

Significant other

Significant

active markets for

observable

unobservable

Carrying

Estimated

identical assets

inputs

inputs

amount

fair value

(Level 1)

(Level 2)

(Level 3)
Investment securities available-for-sale
$            1,196,956

$               1,196,956

$                            -

$               1,153,403

$                   43,553
Investment securities held-to-maturity
86,402

85,099

-

78,756

6,343
Securities purchased under agreements to resell
65,095

65,095

65,095

-

-
Federal Home Loan Bank and Atlantic Central Bankers Bank stock
991

991

-

-

991
Commercial loans held for sale
380,272

380,272

-

-

380,272
Loans, net of deferred loan fees and costs
1,374,060

1,373,325

-

-

1,373,325
Investment in unconsolidated entity, senior note
103,950

103,950

-

-

103,950
Investment in unconsolidated entity, subordinated note
3,761

3,761

-

-

3,761
Assets held for sale
314,994

314,994

-

-

314,994
Demand and interest checking
3,113,212

3,113,212

3,113,212

-

-
Savings and money market
452,183

452,183

452,183

-

-
Subordinated debentures
13,401

9,873

-

-

9,873
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase
180

180

180

-

-
Interest rate swaps, asset
722

722

-

722

-



	March 31, 2020
			Quoted prices in	Significant other	Significant
			active markets for	observable	unobservable
	Carrying	Estimated	identical assets	inputs	inputs
	amount	fair value	(Level 1)	(Level 2)	(Level 3)
Investment securities, available-for-sale	$ 1,353,278	$ 1,353,278	$ -	$ 1,160,327	$ 192,951
Federal Home Loan Bank and Atlantic Central Bankers Bank stock	1,142	1,142	-	-	1,142
Commercial loans held-for-sale	1,716,450	1,716,450	-	-	1,716,450
Loans, net of deferred loan fees and costs	1,985,755	1,975,955	-	-	1,975,955
Investment in unconsolidated entity	34,273	34,273	-	-	34,273
Assets held-for-sale from discontinued operations	134,118	134,118	-	-	134,118
Interest rate swaps, liability	2,390	2,390	-	2,390	-
Demand and interest checking	4,512,949	4,512,949	-	4,512,949	-
Savings and money market	178,174	178,174	-	178,174	-
Subordinated debentures	13,401	6,853	-	-	6,853
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase	42	42	42	-	-

December 31, 2016

Quoted prices in

Significant other

Significant

active markets for

observable

unobservable

Carrying

Estimated

identical assets

inputs

inputs

amount

fair value

(Level 1)

(Level 2)

(Level 3)
Investment securities available-for-sale
$            1,248,614

$               1,248,614

$                            -

$               1,248,614

$                           -
Investment securities held-to-maturity
93,467

91,799

-

85,760

6,039
Securities purchased under agreements to resell
39,199

39,199

39,199

-

-
Federal Home Loan Bank and Atlantic Central Bankers Bank stock
1,613

1,613

-

-

1,613
Commercial loans held for sale
663,140

663,140

-

-

663,140
Loans, net of deferred loan fees and costs
1,222,911

1,219,625

-

-

1,219,625
Investment in unconsolidated entity, senior note
118,389

118,389

-

-

118,389
Investment in unconsolidated entity, subordinated note
8,541

8,541

-

-

8,541
Assets held for sale
360,711

360,711

-

-

360,711
Demand and interest checking
3,816,524

3,816,524

3,816,524

-

-
Savings and money market
421,780

421,780

421,780

-

-
Subordinated debentures
13,401

9,290

-

-

9,290
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase
274

274

274

-

-
Interest rate swaps, asset
3,207

3,207

-

3,207

-



	December 31, 2019
			Quoted prices in	Significant other	Significant
			active markets for	observable	unobservable
	Carrying	Estimated	identical assets	inputs	inputs
	amount	fair value	(Level 1)	(Level 2)	(Level 3)
Investment securities, available-for-sale	$ 1,320,692	$ 1,320,692	$ -	$ 1,203,359	$ 117,333
Investment securities, held-to-maturity	84,387	83,002	-	75,850	7,152
Federal Home Loan Bank and Atlantic Central Bankers Bank stock	5,342	5,342	-	-	5,342
Commercial loans held-for-sale	1,180,546	1,180,546	-	-	1,180,546
Loans, net of deferred loan fees and costs	1,824,245	1,826,154	-	-	1,826,154
Investment in unconsolidated entity	39,154	39,154	-	-	39,154
Assets held-for-sale from discontinued operations	140,657	140,657	-	-	140,657
Interest rate swaps, liability	232	232	-	232	-
Demand and interest checking	4,402,740	4,402,740	-	4,402,740	-
Savings and money market	174,290	174,290	-	174,290	-
Time deposits	475,000	475,000	-	-	475,000
Subordinated debentures	13,401	9,736	-	-	9,736
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase	82	82	82	-	-

The assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis, segregated by fair value hierarchy, are summarized below (in thousands):



		Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using				Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using
		Quoted prices in active	Significant other	Significant		Quoted prices in active	Significant other	Significant
		markets for identical	observable	unobservable		markets for identical	observable	unobservable
	Fair value	assets	inputs	inputs	Fair value	assets	inputs	inputs
	September 30, 2017	(Level 1)	(Level 2)	(Level 3)	March 31, 2020	(Level 1)	(Level 2)	(Level 3)

Investment securities available-for-sale
Investment securities, available-for-sale
U.S. Government agency securities	$ 35,225	$ -	$ 35,225	$ -	$ 50,387	$ -	$ 50,387	$ -
Asset-backed securities	264,939	-	264,939	-	229,252	-	229,252	-
Obligations of states and political subdivisions	86,432	-	86,432	-	64,417	-	64,417	-
Residential mortgage-backed securities	364,437	-	364,437	-	326,322	-	326,322	-
Collateralized mortgage obligation securities	129,093	-	129,093	-	210,153	-	210,153	-
Commercial mortgage-backed securities	153,648	-	110,095	43,553	391,995	-	279,796	112,199
Foreign debt securities	59,995	-	59,995	-
Corporate debt securities	103,187	-	103,187	-	80,752	-	-	80,752
Total investment securities available-for-sale	1,196,956	-	1,153,403	43,553	1,353,278	-	1,160,327	192,951
Loans held for sale	380,272	-	-	380,272
Investment in unconsolidated entity, senior note	103,950	-	-	103,950
Investment in unconsolidated entity, subordinated note	3,761	-	-	3,761
Interest rate swaps, asset	722	-	722	-
Commercial loans held-for-sale					1,716,450	-	-	1,716,450
Investment in unconsolidated entity					34,273	-	-	34,273
Assets held-for-sale from discontinued operations					134,118	-	-	134,118
Interest rate swaps, liability					2,390	-	2,390	-
	$ 1,685,661	$ -	$ 1,154,125	$ 531,536	$ 3,235,729	$ -	$ 1,157,937	$ 2,077,792



		Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using				Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using
		Quoted prices in active	Significant other	Significant		Quoted prices in active	Significant other	Significant
		markets for identical	observable	unobservable		markets for identical	observable	unobservable
	Fair value	assets	inputs	inputs	Fair value	assets	inputs	inputs
	December 31, 2016	(Level 1)	(Level 2)	(Level 3)	December 31, 2019	(Level 1)	(Level 2)	(Level 3)

Investment securities available-for-sale
Investment securities, available-for-sale
U.S. Government agency securities	$ 27,702	$ -	$ 27,702	$ -	$ 52,910	$ -	$ 52,910	$ -
Asset-backed securities	355,396	-	355,396	-	244,349	-	244,349	-
Obligations of states and political subdivisions	94,533	-	94,533	-	65,568	-	65,568	-
Residential mortgage-backed securities	342,569	-	342,569	-	336,596	-	336,596	-
Collateralized mortgage obligation securities	159,823	-	159,823	-	222,727	-	222,727	-
Commercial mortgage-backed securities	117,086	-	117,086	-	398,542	-	281,209	117,333
Foreign debt securities	56,497	-	56,497	-
Corporate debt securities	95,008	-	95,008	-
Total investment securities available-for-sale	1,248,614	-	1,248,614	-	1,320,692	-	1,203,359	117,333
Loans held for sale	663,140	-	-	663,140
Investment in unconsolidated entity, senior note	118,389	-	-	118,389
Investment in unconsolidated entity, subordinated note	8,541	-	-	8,541
Interest rate swaps, asset	3,207	-	3,207	-
Commercial loans held-for-sale					1,180,546	-	-	1,180,546
Investment in unconsolidated entity					39,154	-	-	39,154
Assets held-for-sale from discontinued operations					140,657	-	-	140,657
Interest rate swaps, liability					232	-	232	-
	$ 2,041,891	$ -	$ 1,251,821	$ 790,070	$ 2,680,817	$ -	$ 1,203,127	$ 1,477,690

In addition, ASC 820 ~~“Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures”,~~ establishes a common definition for fair value to be applied to assets and liabilities. It clarifies that fair value is an exit price, representing the amount that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. It also establishes a framework for measuring fair value and expands disclosures concerning fair value measurements. ASC 820 establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value. The hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1 measurements) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3 measurements). Level 1 valuation is based on quoted market prices for identical assets or liabilities to which the Company has access at the measurement date. Level 2 valuation is based on other observable inputs for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. This includes quoted prices for similar assets in active or inactive markets, inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability such as yield curves, volatilities, prepayment speeds, credit risks, default rates, or inputs that are derived principally from, or corroborated through, observable market data by market-corroborated reports. Level 3 valuation is based on “unobservable inputs” which the Company believes is the best information available in the circumstances. A financial instrument’s level within the fair value hierarchy is based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement.

The ~~changes in the~~ Company’s Level 3 ~~assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis, segregated by fair value hierarchy level,~~asset activity for the categories shown for year to date are summarized below (in thousands):



	Fair Value Measurements Using				Fair Value Measurements Using
	Significant Unobservable Inputs				Significant Unobservable Inputs
	(Level 3)				(Level 3)

	Available-for-sale		Commercial loans		Available-for-sale		Commercial loans
	securities		held for sale		securities		held-for-sale
	September 30, 2017	December 31, 2016	September 30, 2017	December 31, 2016	March 31, 2020	December 31, 2019	March 31, 2020	December 31, 2019
Beginning balance	$ -	$ -	$ 663,140	$ 489,938	$ 117,333	$ 24,390	$ 1,180,546	$ 688,471
Transfers into level 3	-	-	-	-	-	100,664	-	-
Transfers out of level 3	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Total gains or losses (realized/unrealized)
Reclass of held-to-maturity securities to available-for-sale					85,151	-	-	-
Total gains or (losses) (realized/unrealized)
Included in earnings	-	-	20,019	(3,078)	-	-	(2,998)	25,986
Included in other comprehensive income	-	-	-	-	734	688	-	-
Purchases, issuances, and settlements
Purchases, issuances, sales and settlements
Purchases	43,553				-	-	-	-
Issuances	-	-	398,410	528,584	-	-	541,615	1,795,376
Sales	-	-	(701,297)	(352,304)	-	-	-	(1,329,287)
Settlements	-	-	-	-	(10,267)	(8,409)	(2,713)	-
Ending balance	$ 43,553	$ -	$ 380,272	$ 663,140	$ 192,951	$ 117,333	$ 1,716,450	$ 1,180,546

The amount of total gains or (losses) for the period
included in earnings attributable to the change in
Total gains or (losses) year to date included
in earnings attributable to the change in
unrealized gains or losses relating to assets still
held at the reporting date.	$ -	$ -	$ 703	$ (2,674)
held at the reporting date as shown above.					$ -	$ -	$ (2,855)	$ 963

The Company’s Level 3 asset activity for the categories shown for year to date are summarized below (in thousands):


	Fair Value Measurements Using					Fair Value Measurements Using
	Significant Unobservable Inputs					Significant Unobservable Inputs
	(Level 3)					(Level 3)

	Investment in			Assets		Investment in			Assets held-for-sale
	unconsolidated entity			held for sale		unconsolidated entity			from discontinued operations
		September 30, 2017	December 31, 2016	September 30, 2017	December 31, 2016		March 31, 2020	December 31, 2019	March 31, 2020	December 31, 2019
Beginning balance		$ 126,930	$ 178,520	$ 360,711	$ 583,909		$ 39,154	$ 59,273	$ 140,657	$ 197,831
Transfers into level 3		-	-	-	-		-	-	-	-
Transfers out of level 3		-	-	-	-		-	-	-	-
Total gains or losses (realized/unrealized)
Total gains or (losses) (realized/unrealized)
Included in earnings		(20)	(39,816)	638	(48,836)		(45)	-	(819)	(487)
Included in other comprehensive income		-	-	-	-		-	-	-	-
Purchases, issuances, and settlements
Purchases, issuances, sales, settlements and charge-offs
Purchases		-	-	-	-		-	-	-	-
Issuances		-	-	-	-		-	-	20	2,125
Sales		-	-	-	(63,712)		-	-	(1,252)	(7,136)
Settlements		(19,199)	(11,774)	(33,400)	(110,650)		(4,836)	(20,119)	(4,488)	(49,021)
Charge-offs		-	-	(12,955)	-		-	-	-	(2,655)
Ending balance		$ 107,711	$ 126,930	$ 314,994	$ 360,711		$ 34,273	$ 39,154	$ 134,118	$ 140,657

The amount of total gains or (losses) for the period
included in earnings attributable to the change in
Total losses year to date included
in earnings attributable to the change in
unrealized gains or losses relating to assets still
held at the reporting date.		$ (20)	$ (39,816)	$ (1,776)	$ (48,836)
held at the reporting date as shown above.							$ (45)	$ -	$ (819)	$ (487)

Fair value at

Fair value at

Level 3 instruments only

September 30, 2017

December 31, 2016

Valuation techniques

Unobservable inputs

Range

Investment securities available-for-sale

$                         43,553

$     ��                           -

Discounted cash flow

Discount rate

7.0%-9.5%
Investment securities held-to-maturity

6,343

6,039

Discounted cash flow

Discount rate

8.00%
Federal Home Loan Bank and Atlantic

991

1,613

Cost

N/A

N/A
  Central Bankers Bank stock

Loans, net of deferred loan fees and costs

1,373,325

1,219,625

Discounted cash flow

Discount rate

3.5%-7.2%
Commercial loans held for sale

380,272

663,140

Discounted cash flow

Discount rate

4.85%-7.05%
Investment in unconsolidated entity,

103,950

118,389

Discounted cash flow

Discount rate

4.75%
senior note

Default rate

1.00%
Investment in unconsolidated entity,

3,761

8,541

Discounted cash flow

Discount rate

11.00%
subordinated note

Default rate

1.00%
Assets held for sale

314,994

360,711

Discounted cash flow

Discount rate

3.67%-9.32%
Subordinated debentures

9,873

9,290

Discounted cash flow

Discount rate

7.00%



	Level 3 instruments only
					Weighted
	Fair value at			Range at	average at
	March 31, 2020	Valuation techniques	Unobservable inputs	March 31, 2020	March 31, 2020

Commercial mortgage backed investment	$ 112,199	Discounted cash flow	Discount rate	5.00% - 9.13%	6.17%
securities available-for-sale (a)
Insurance liquidating trust preferred security,	5,152	Discounted cash flow	Discount rate	9.80%	9.80%
available for sale (b)
Corporate debt securities (c)	75,600	Traders' pricing	Price indications	-	-
Federal Home Loan Bank and Atlantic	1,142	Cost	N/A	N/A	N/A
Central Bankers Bank stock
Loans, net of deferred loan fees and costs (d)	1,975,955	Discounted cash flow	Discount rate	3.80% - 7.50%	3.68%

Commercial - SBA (e)	223,988	Traders' pricing	Offered quotes	$103.50 - $107.93	$104.70
Commercial - fixed (f)	85,774	Discounted cash flow	Discount rate	4.80% - 6.45%	5.70%
Commercial - floating (g)	1,406,688	Discounted cash flow	Discount rate	5.00% - 7.10%	5.09%
Commercial loans held-for-sale	1,716,450

Investment in unconsolidated entity (h)	34,273	Discounted cash flow	Discount rate	7.00%	7.00%
			Default rate	1.00%	1.00%
Assets held-for-sale from discontinued operations (i)	134,118	Discounted cash flow	Discount rate,	3.33% - 7.56%	4.60%
			Credit analysis
Subordinated debentures (j)	6,853	Discounted cash flow	Discount rate	9.80%	9.80%


	Level 3 instruments only

	Fair value at			Range at
	December 31, 2019	Valuation techniques	Unobservable inputs	December 31, 2019

Commercial mortgage backed investment	$ 117,333	Discounted cash flow	Discount rate	4.05% - 8.18%
securities available-for-sale (a)
Insurance liquidating trust preferred security,	7,152	Discounted cash flow	Discount rate	8.01%
available for sale (b)
Federal Home Loan Bank and Atlantic	5,342	Cost	N/A	N/A
Central Bankers Bank stock
Loans, net of deferred loan fees and costs (d)	1,826,154	Discounted cash flow	Discount rate	3.11% - 6.93%

Commercial - SBA (e)	220,358	Traders' pricing	Offered quotes	$101.6 - $107.9
Commercial - fixed (f)	88,986	Discounted cash flow	Discount rate	4.33% - 7.13%
Commercial - floating (g)	871,202	Discounted cash flow	Discount rate	4.51% - 6.81%
Commercial loans held-for-sale	1,180,546

Investment in unconsolidated entity (h)	39,154	Discounted cash flow	Discount rate	5.84%
			Default rate	1.00%
Assets held-for-sale from discontinued operations (i)	140,657	Discounted cash flow	Discount rate,	3.49% -7.58%
			Credit analysis
Subordinated debentures (j)	9,736	Discounted cash flow	Discount rate	8.01%

The valuations for each of the instruments above, as of the balance sheet date, is subject to judgments, assumptions and uncertainties, changes in which could have a significant impact on such valuations. All weighted averages were calculated by using the discount rate for each individual security or loan weighted by its market value, except for SBA loans. For SBA loans, traders’ pricing indications for pools determined by date of loan origination were weighted. For commercial loans held-for-sale, investment in unconsolidated entity and assets held-for-sale from discontinued operations, changes in fair value are reflected in the income statement. Changes in fair value of securities which are unrelated to credit are recorded through equity, while changes in the fair value of loans unrelated to credit are a disclosure item, without impact on the financial statements. The notes below refer to the March 31, 2020 table.

Assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis, segregated by fair value hierarchy, during the periods shown are summarized below (in thousands):



		Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using				Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using
		Quoted prices in active	Significant other	Significant		Quoted prices in active	Significant other	Significant
		markets for identical	observable	unobservable		markets for identical	observable	unobservable
	Fair value	assets	inputs	inputs	Fair value	assets	inputs	inputs (1)
Description ~~(1)~~	September 30, 2017	(Level 1)	(Level 2)	(Level 3)	March 31, 2020	(Level 1)	(Level 2)	(Level 3)

Impaired loans - collateral dependent	$ 4,011	$ -	$ -	$ 4,011
Other real estate owned	-	-	-	-
Collateral dependent loans (1)					$ 18,994	$ -	$ -	$ 18,994
Intangible assets	5,185	-	-	5,185	2,857	-	-	2,857
	$ 9,196	$ -	$ -	$ 9,196	$ 21,851	$ -	$ -	$ 21,851

At ~~September 30, 2017,~~March 31, 2020, principal on ~~impaired~~collateral dependent loans and troubled debt restructurings, ~~that~~which is accounted for on the basis of the value of underlying collateral, is shown at estimated fair value of ~~$4.0~~$19.0 million. To arrive at that fair value, related loan principal of ~~$5.8~~$22.0 million was reduced by specific reserves of ~~$1.8~~$3.0 million within the allowance for ~~loan~~credit losses as of that date, representing the deficiency between principal and estimated collateral values, which were reduced by costs to sell. When the deficiency is deemed uncollectible, it is charged off by reducing the specific reserve and decreasing principal. Included in the ~~impaired~~collateral dependent balance at ~~September 30, 2017~~March 31, 2020 were ~~seven~~twelve troubled debt restructured loans with a balance of ~~$1.8~~$17.4 million which had specific reserves of ~~$534,000.~~$1.0 million. Valuation techniques consistent with the market and/or cost approach were used to measure fair value and primarily included observable inputs for the individual

~~impaired~~ collateral dependent loans being evaluated such as recent sales of similar assets or observable market data for operational or carrying costs. In cases where such inputs were unobservable, the loan balance is reflected within the Level 3 hierarchy. The fair value of other real estate owned is based on an appraisal of the property using the market approach for valuation.

The Company utilizes derivative instruments to assist in the management of interest rate sensitivity by modifying the repricing, maturity and option characteristics on commercial real estate loans ~~held for sale.~~held-for-sale. These instruments are not accounted for as effective hedges. As of ~~September 30, 2017,~~March 31, 2020, the Company had entered into ~~eleven~~six interest rate swap agreements with an aggregate notional amount of ~~$59.7~~$37.8 million. These swap agreements provide for the Company to receive an adjustable rate of interest based upon the three-month London Interbank Offering Rate (LIBOR). The Company recorded a loss of ~~$2.5~~$2.2 million for the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September 30, 2017~~March 31, 2020 to recognize the fair value of the derivative instruments which is reported in ~~gain (loss)~~net realized and unrealized gains (losses) on commercial loans originated for sale in the consolidated statements of ~~loans.~~operations. The amount ~~receivable~~payable by the Company under these swap agreements was ~~$722,000~~$2.4 million at ~~September 30, 2017~~March 31, 2020, which is reported in other ~~assets.~~liabilities. The Company had minimum collateral posting thresholds with certain of its derivative counterparties and had posted cash collateral of ~~$756,000~~$2.3 million as of ~~September 30, 2017.~~March 31, 2020.

The maturity dates, notional amounts, interest rates paid and received and fair value of the Company’s remaining interest rate swap agreements as of ~~September 30, 2017~~March 31, 2020 are summarized below (dollars in thousands):



	September 30, 2017				March 31, 2020
Maturity date	Notional amount	Interest rate paid	Interest rate received	Fair value	Notional amount	Interest rate paid	Interest rate received	Fair value
August 4, 2021	$ 10,300	1.12%	1.31%	$ 306	$ 10,300	1.12%	1.75%	(74)
August 17, 2025	2,500	2.27%	1.31%	(15)
August 17, 2025	2,500	2.27%	1.31%	(15)
December 11, 2025	2,400	2.14%	1.32%	13
December 23, 2025	6,800	2.16%	1.33%	27	6,800	2.16%	1.20%	(626)
December 24, 2025	8,200	2.17%	1.33%	22	8,200	2.17%	1.20%	(763)
January 28, 2026	3,000	1.87%	1.31%	79	3,000	1.87%	1.80%	(228)
July 20, 2026	6,300	1.44%	1.31%	405	6,300	1.44%	1.82%	(340)
December 12, 2026	3,200	2.26%	1.31%	(2)	3,200	2.26%	78.00%	(359)
January 4, 2027	10,100	2.35%	1.30%	(79)
April 27, 2027	4,400	2.32%	1.32%	(19)
Total	$ 59,700			$ 722	$ 37,800			$ (2,390)

On November 29, 2012, the Company acquired certain software rights for approximately $1.8 million for use in managing prepaid cards in connection with an acquisition. The software is being amortized over eight years. Amortization expense is $217,000 per year ($~~610,000~~111,000 over the remainder of the amortization period). The gross carrying amount of the software is $1.8 million, and as of ~~September 30, 2017,~~March 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019, respectively, the accumulated amortization was ~~$1.3~~$1.7 million and $1.7 million.

In May 2016, the Company purchased approximately ~~$60~~$60.0 million of lease receivables which resulted in a customer list intangible of $3.4 million ~~which~~that is being amortized over a 10 year period. Amortization expense is $340,000 per year ($1.7 million over the next five years). The gross carrying amount of the customer list intangible is $3.4 million, and as of ~~September 30, 2017,~~March 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019, respectively, the accumulated amortization was ~~$471,000.~~$1.3 million and $1.2 million.

In January 2020, the Company purchased McMahon Leasing and subsidiaries for approximately $4.6 million. In the acquisition the Company acquired $9.9 million of leases, $958,000 in automobile inventory and other assets. The excess of the consideration issued over the book value of the assets acquired was $1.5 million which was allocated as follows. The fair value of the leases was $453,000 over their book value and is being amortized over the lives of the leases. A customer list intangible of $689,000 is being amortized over a 12 year period. Amortization expense is $57,000 per year ($285,000 over the next five years). The Company preliminarily allocated the $689,000 to the customer list and expects to complete its accounting for this business combination by the fourth quarter of 2020. Until completion, the above allocation of purchase price is considered preliminary. The gross carrying amount of the customer list intangible is $689,000 as of March 31, 2020 and the accumulated amortization was $14,000. The remainder of the $1.5 million excess of consideration over book value was a trade name valuation of $135,000, inventory valuation adjustment of $100,000 and $105,000 for goodwill. A loan outstanding of approximately $4 million to the acquired entity was eliminated as part of the transaction. Approximately $4.4 million of liabilities were assumed.

In May 2014, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers”. This ASU establishes a comprehensive revenue recognition standard for virtually all industries utilizing U.S. GAAP, including those that

previously followed industry-specific guidance such as the real estate and construction industries. The revenue standard’s core principle is built on the contract between a vendor and a customer for the provision of goods and services. It attempts to depict the exchange of rights and obligations between the parties in the pattern of revenue recognition based on the consideration to which the vendor is entitled. To accomplish this, the standard requires five basic steps: (i) identify the contract with the customer, (ii) identify the performance obligations in the contract, (iii) identify the transaction price, (iv) allocate the transaction price to the performance obligations in the contract, and (v) recognize revenue when (or as) the entity satisfies the performance obligation. Three basic transition methods are available - full retrospective, retrospective with certain practical expedients, and a cumulative effect approach. We plan to adopt the standard using the cumulative effect approach. Under the cumulative effect alternative, an entity would apply the new revenue standard only to contracts that are incomplete under legacy U.S. GAAP at the date of initial application and recognize the cumulative effect of the new standard as an adjustment to the opening balance of retained earnings. The guidance in this ASU is effective for annual periods and interim reporting periods within those annual periods, beginning after December 15, 2017. Since the standard does not apply to revenue from loans, securities and other financial instruments, based on our evaluation to date, we do not expect the adoption of this standard to have a significant impact on our consolidated results of operations or our consolidated financial position. We are still evaluating the presentation of certain in-scope revenue on the income statement related to our payments business. We have commenced a contract review for those in-scope revenue streams. The Company’s contracts with its various third parties generally do not entail significant amounts of deferred revenues. Instead, services are performed monthly and amounts are billed either monthly or quarterly. Nonetheless, the Company is in process of conducting a review of its contracts and sources of income to ascertain that the standard will not have a material impact on the consolidated statement of operations or financial position. The review will include the non interest income producing categories of the Company which include prepaid cards, merchant acquiring, ACH, service fees on deposit accounts, gains and losses on other real estate owned, gains and losses on the sale of loans and other categories.

In August 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-14, “Receivables - Troubled Debt Restructurings by Creditors (Subtopic 310-40): Classification of Certain Government-Guaranteed Mortgage Loans upon Foreclosure”. The guidance in this ASU affects creditors that hold government-guaranteed mortgage loans, including those guaranteed by the Federal Home Administration (FHA) and the Veterans Administration (VA). It requires that a mortgage loan be derecognized and a separate other receivable be recognized upon foreclosure if the following conditions are met:

~~This standard did not have a significant impact on our consolidated results of operations or our consolidated financial position.~~

~~In January 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-11, “Financial Instruments-Overall (Subtopic 825-10) Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities”~~. This ASU revises an entity’s accounting related to the classification and measurement of investments in equity securities and the presentation of certain fair value changes for financial liabilities measured at fair value. It also amends certain disclosure requirements associated with the fair value of financial instruments. For public business entities, the amendments in this update are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within those fiscal years. ~~The Company is currently assessing the impact that the adoption of this standard will have on the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.~~

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, “Leases”. The FASB issued this ASU to increase transparency and comparability among organizations by recognizing lease assets and lease liabilities on the balance sheet by lessees for those leases classified as operating leases under current U.S. GAAP and disclosing key information about leasing arrangements. The amendments in this ASU are effective for annual periods, and interim periods within those annual periods, beginning after December 15, 2018. ~~Early~~The Company adopted this guidance on its effective date using a modified retrospective transition approach, applying the new standard to all leases existing at the date of initial application, January 1, 2019. Consequently, financial information will not be updated and the disclosures required under the new standard will not be provided for dates and periods before January 1, 2019.

The new standard provides a number of optional practical expedients in transition. The Company has elected the practical expedients option which does not require reassessment of its prior conclusions about lease identification, lease classification and initial direct costs. The Company has not elected the use-of-hindsight or the practical expedient pertaining to land easements; the latter not being applicable to it.

The effect of this ~~ASU is permitted~~adoption was the recognition at January 1, 2019 of a $16.4 million operating lease right-of-use (ROU) asset, which has been adjusted for ~~all entities.~~previously recorded accrued rent of $1.7 million, and an $18.1 million operating lease obligation. No opening retained earnings adjustments are necessary under the modified retrospective transition approach. The ~~Company is currently assessing the impact that the~~ adoption of this ~~standard will~~guidance did not have an impact on the ~~financial condition and~~consolidated results of operations of the Company.

The ASU also includes disclosure requirements for lessors which encompass the Company’s direct financing leases. The first disclosure requirement is to discuss significant shifts, if any, in the balance of unguaranteed residual assets and deferred selling profit on direct financing leases. The Company’s direct financing lease portfolio consists primarily of vehicles which are sold at the end of lease terms. The Company does not hold title to the vehicles prior to inception of the lease and, thus, selling profit is not expected or deferred. However, sales of the vehicles may result in income when sales prices exceed residual values. This income is reported in the consolidated statements of operations under non-interest income. Since the majority of the portfolio is comprised of vehicle leases, sales prices may differ from residual values as a result of changes in the used vehicle market for both commercial vehicles such as trucks and passenger vehicles.

Additionally, the Company is required to disclose the scheduled maturities of its direct financing leases reconciled to the total lease receivables in the consolidated balance sheet, which are as follows (in thousands):

In ~~March~~June 2016, the FASB issued ~~ASU 2016-09, “Compensation-Stock Compensation: Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting”.~~ This ASU simplifies several areas of accounting for share based payment award transactions, including the income tax consequences, classification of awards as either equity or liabilities, and the classification on the statement of cash flows. For public companies, this is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016, and the interim periods within those annual periods. The Company adopted the guidance in the first quarter of 2017, and the adoption did not have a material impact on first quarter results.

~~In September 2016, the FASB issued~~an update ASU 2016-13 – “Financial Instruments – Credit Losses (Topic 326):Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial ~~Instruments-Update”~~Instruments”. The Update changes the accounting for credit losses on loans and debt securities. For loans and held-to-maturity debt securities, the Update requires ana current expected credit loss ~~model~~(CECL) approach to determine the allowance for credit losses. ~~The expected credit~~CECL requires loss ~~model~~ estimates ~~losses~~ for the remaining estimated life of the financial ~~asset. Expected credit losses reflect losses over the remaining contractual life of an~~ asset ~~considering the effect of voluntary prepayments and considering available information about the collectability~~

~~of cash flows, including information about past events,~~using historical experience, current conditions, and reasonable and supportable forecasts. ~~The resulting~~Also, the Update eliminates the existing guidance for purchased credit deteriorated loans, but requires an allowance for ~~credit losses reflects the portion of the amortized cost basis that the entity does not expect to collect. Additional quantitative and qualitative disclosures are required upon adoption.~~ purchased financial assets with more than insignificant deterioration since origination. In addition, the Update modifies the ~~other-than-temporary~~OTTI impairment model for available-for-sale debt securities to require an allowance for credit impairment instead of a direct write-down, which allows for reversal of credit impairments in future ~~periods.~~periods based on improvements in credit. The guidance iswas effective in the first quarter of 2020 with a cumulative-effect adjustment to retained earnings as of the beginning of the year of adoption. ~~Early~~As a result of the Company’s adoption of the guidance in first quarter 2020, it recorded a $2.4 million charge to retained earnings and an $834,000 deferred tax asset, which were offset by $2.7 million in the allowance for credit losses and a $569,000 credit to other liabilities. The $569,000 reflected a reserve on unfunded commitments.

In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-13, “Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820) Disclosure Framework—Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Fair Value Measurement” which eliminates certain fair value disclosures, adds new disclosures and amends another disclosure applicable to the Company as follows. The amendment states that disclosure of measurement uncertainty of the fair values to changes in inputs will be required for the reporting date and not future dates. New fair value disclosures consist of disclosure of: a) total gains and losses in other comprehensive income from fair value changes in Level 3 assets and liabilities that are held on the balance sheet date; b) the range and weighted average of inputs and how the weighted average was calculated and c) if weighted average is not meaningful, other quantitative information that better reflects the distribution of inputs. ASU 2018-13 was implemented in first quarter 2020, and the disclosures discussed are included in the financial statements. There was no material impact on the financial statements.

In March 2020, the FASB issued ASU 2020-04 which addressed optional expedients and exceptions for applying GAAP to contract modifications and hedging relationships, resulting from the phase-out of the LIBOR reference rate. The interest rates on certain of the Company’s securities, the majority of its commercial loan held-for-sale portfolio and its trust preferred securities outstanding (classified as subordinated debenture on the balance sheet), utilize LIBOR as a reference rate. To maximize management and accounting flexibility for holders of instruments using LIBOR as a benchmark, the guidance permitted ~~beginning~~a one-time transfer of such instruments from held-to-maturity to available-for-sale. The Company made such a transfer of four LIBOR-based securities, which comprised its held-to-maturity portfolio, in the first quarter of ~~2019.~~2020. The Company is ~~evaluating~~assessing the potential impact of the ~~Update will have on the consolidated financial statements.~~ phase-out of LIBOR and related accounting guidance.

It is the policy of the Federal Reserve that financial holding companies should pay cash dividends on common stock only out of income available over the past year and only if prospective earnings retention is consistent with the organization’s expected future needs and financial condition. The policy provides that a financial holding company should not maintain a level of cash dividends that undermines the financial holding company’s ability to serve as a source of strength to its banking subsidiaries.

Various federal and state statutory provisions limit the amount of dividends that subsidiary banks can pay to their holding companies without regulatory approval. Under Delaware banking law, the Bank’s directors may declare dividends on common or preferred stock of so much of its net profits as they judge expedient, but the Bank must, before the declaration of a dividend on common stock from net profits, carry 50% of its net profits from the preceding period for which the dividend is paid to its surplus fund until its surplus fund amounts to 50% of its capital stock and thereafter must carry 25% of its net profits for the preceding period for which the dividend is paid to its surplus fund until its surplus fund amounts to 100% of its capital stock.

In addition to these explicit limitations, federal and state regulatory agencies are authorized to prohibit a banking subsidiary or financial holding company from engaging in an unsafe or unsound practice. Depending upon the circumstances, the agencies could take the position that paying a dividend would constitute an unsafe or unsound banking practice. In August 2015, the Bank entered into an Amendment to a 2014 Consent Order with the FDIC pursuant to which the Bank may not pay dividends without prior FDIC approval. On May 11, 2015, the Company ~~had~~ received a Supervisory Letter pursuant to which the Company ~~may~~could not pay dividends without prior Federal Reserve approval. The requirement for Federal Reserve ~~approved~~approval was lifted in fourth quarter 2019 at which time the ~~payment of the interest on the Company’s trust preferred securities which were due September 15, 2017. Future payments are subject to future approval by the Federal Reserve.~~letter was terminated.

The Company and the Bank are subject to various regulatory capital requirements administered by the federal banking agencies. Failure to meet minimum capital requirements can initiate certain mandatory and possible additional discretionary actions by regulators that, if undertaken, could have a direct material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements. Under capital adequacy guidelines

and the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action, the Company and the Bank must meet specific capital guidelines that involve quantitative measures of their assets, liabilities and certain off-balance-sheet items as calculated under regulatory accounting practices. The capital amounts and classification of the Company and the Bank are also subject to qualitative judgments by the regulators about components, risk weightings and other factors. Moreover, capital requirements may be modified based upon regulatory rules or by regulatory discretion at any time reflecting a variety of factors. including deterioration in asset quality.

On June 12, 2019, the Bank was served with a qui tam lawsuit filed in the Superior Court of the State of Delaware, New Castle County. The Delaware Department of Justice intervened in the litigation. The case is titled The State of Delaware, Plaintiff, Ex rel. Russell S. Rogers, Plaintiff-Relator, v. The Bancorp Bank, Interactive Communications International, Inc., and InComm Financial Services, Inc., Defendants. The lawsuit alleges that the defendants violated the Delaware False Claims Act by not paying balances on certain open-loop “Vanilla” prepaid cards to the State of Delaware as unclaimed property. The complaint seeks actual and treble damages, statutory penalties, and attorneys’ fees. The Bank denies the allegations and is defending itself. The Bank and other defendants filed a motion to dismiss the action, but the motion was denied on February 7, 2020. The Bank has filed an answer and continues to vigorously defend the claims. At this time, the Company is unable to determine whether the ultimate resolution of the matter will have a material adverse effect on our financial condition or operations.

The Company has received and is responding to two non-public fact-finding inquiries from the SEC, which in each case is seeking to determine if violations of the federal securities laws have occurred. We refer to these inquiries collectively as the SEC matters. On October 9, 2019, the Company received a subpoena ~~from~~seeking records related generally to The Bancorp Bank’s debit card issuance activity and gross dollar volume data, among other things. The Company responded to the ~~SEC, dated March 22, 2016, relating~~subpoena and is in the process of responding to ~~an investigation~~subsequent subpoenas issued to the Company. Unrelated to the first inquiry, on April 10, 2020, the Company received a subpoena in connection with The Bancorp Bank’s CMBS business seeking records related to various offerings as well as CMBS securities held by the Bank. Since inception of these SEC ofmatters to the ~~Company's restatement of its financial statements for~~present, the years ended December 31, 2010 through December 31, 2013 and the interim periods ended March 31, 2014, September 30, 2014 and September 30, 2014, which restatement was filed with the SEC on September 28, 2015, and the facts and circumstances underlying the restatement. The Company ishas been cooperating fully with the ~~SEC's investigation.~~SEC. The SEC has not made any findings, or alleged any wrongdoings, with respect to the SEC matters. The costs related to ~~respond~~responding to ~~the subpoena~~ and ~~cooperate~~cooperating with the ~~SEC's investigation have been~~SEC staff may be material, and ~~we expect such costs to~~could continue to be material at least through the completion of the ~~SEC’s investigation.~~

On September 30, 2016, the Company received written notice from the Internal Revenue Service that it will be conducting an audit of the Company's tax returns for the tax years 2012, 2013 and 2014. The audit is in process.

The Company received a letter dated August 1, 2016, demanding inspection of its books and records pursuant to Section 220 of the Delaware General Corporation Law, or DCGL, from legal counsel representing a shareholder (the "Demand Letter"). The Company, through outside legal counsel, responded to the Demand Letter by permitting the shareholder to inspect certain of the Company’s books and records and by objecting to other requests. On January 30, 2017, the shareholder filed a complaint in the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware seeking an order from the court, pursuant to Section 220 of the DGCL, compelling the Company to permit the shareholder to inspect additional books and records of the Company. The Company believes that its original response to the Demand Letter was appropriate in all respects and continues to defend against the complaint. On July 27, 2017, the Court of Chancery ruled in favor of the Company and granted an Order of Final Judgment Denying Plaintiff’s Demand To Inspect The Books And Records of Defendant. The court’s Order was subject to an appeal right which has now expired; no appeal was filed. Both the Demand Letter and the complaint threaten the commencement of a shareholder’s derivative suit against certain officers and directors of the Company

seeking damages and other remedies on behalf of the Company. We have been advised by our counsel in the matter that reasonably possible losses cannot be estimated, but we and our counsel continue to believe the claim is without merit.

On October 17, 2017, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (the “FDIC”) informed The Bancorp Bank (the “Bank”), a wholly owned subsidiary of The Bancorp, Inc. (the “Company”), that it intends to pursue an Order For Restitution (“Restitution Order”) and Order to Pay Civil Money Penalty (“CMP Order”) in an amount up to $2,576,000. The FDIC’s action principally emanates from one of the Bank’s third-party payment processors (“Third Party Processor”) suffering an internal system programming glitch. This inadvertently resulted in consumers that engaged in signature-based point of sale transactions during the period from December 2010 to November 2014 being charged a greater fee than what was disclosed by the Bank. Impacted consumers are being reimbursed by the Third Party Processor at its own expense. The Restitution Order would require the Bank to make such reimbursements if not otherwise made by the Third Party Processor, however, the Bank is indemnified by the Third Party Processor for such reimbursements. Although the Bank is still evaluating its position with regard to the Restitution Order and the CMP Order, the Company accrued $2,500,000 of related expense in its financial statements for the quarter ended September 30, 2017 in connection with the CMP Order. Any amounts owed from the CMP Order would not be subject to any indemnification or recovery from any third party.

The independent investor in Walnut Street, the securitization into which the Bank sold certain loans when it discontinued its Philadelphia commercial loan operations, has taken actions which may result in litigation. Specifically, counsel for the independent investor has requested that the Note Administrator hold monthly distribution payments in escrow until the independent investor’s alternative interpretation of the order of payments, as compared to the interpretation of the Bank and the Note Administrator, is resolved. Based on the independent investor’s request, the Note Administrator withheld the September 2017 payment to the independent investor and the Bank and indicated that it would continue to do so until this issue was resolved. Management of the Company, based on advice of its counsel, believes it is unlikely that the Bank and Note Administrator’s interpretation will be overturned. However, if such interpretation is overturned, based upon the current model used to value Walnut Street, an estimated $8 million loss may be recognized, based on currently estimated cash flows which would be redirected from the Bank to the independent investor.SEC matters.

In addition, we are a party to various routine legal proceedings arising out of the ordinary course of our business. ~~Management~~The Company believes that none of these actions, individually or in the aggregate, will have a material adverse effect on our financial condition or operations.

The Company performed a strategic evaluation of its businesses in the third quarter of 2014. As a result of the evaluation, the Company decided to discontinue its commercial lending operations, as described in Note 15, Discontinued Operations. The shift from a traditional bank balance sheet led the Company to evaluate its continuing operations. Based on the continuing operations of the Company, it was determined that there would be four segments of the business: specialty finance, payments, corporate and discontinued operations. The chief decision maker for these segments is the Chief Executive Officer. Specialty finance includes commercial loan sales and securitization, SBA loans, ~~leasing~~direct lease financing and ~~SBLOCs~~security-backed lines of credit, cash value insurance policy-backed lines of credit and ~~any~~ deposits generated by those business lines. Payments include prepaid ~~cards, merchant~~card accounts, card payments, ACH processing and ~~affinity accounts.~~deposits generated by those business lines. Corporate includes the Company’s investment portfolio, corporate overhead and ~~other~~ non-allocated expenses. Investment income is ~~allocated~~reallocated to the payments segment. These operating segments reflect the way the Company views its current operations.



	For the three months ended September 30, 2016					For the three months ended March 31, 2020
	Specialty finance	Payments	Corporate	Discontinued operations	Total	Specialty finance	Payments	Corporate	Discontinued operations	Total
	(in thousands)					(in thousands)
Interest income	$ 17,727	$ -	$ 9,005	$ -	$ 26,732	$ 39,293	$ -	$ 12,173	$ -	$ 51,466
Interest allocation	-	9,005	(9,005)	-	-	-	12,173	(12,173)	-	-
Interest expense	740	1,975	475	-	3,190	340	5,065	3,150	-	8,555
Net interest income	16,987	7,030	(475)	-	23,542
Provision for loan and lease losses	750	-	-	-	750
Net interest income (loss)						38,953	7,108	(3,150)	-	42,911
Provision for credit losses						3,579	-	-	-	3,579
Non-interest income	4,215	15,180	509	-	19,904	(3,839)	20,421	17	-	16,599
Non-interest expense	16,352	24,081	3,738	-	44,171	16,916	17,145	4,357	-	38,418
Income (loss) from continuing operations before taxes	4,100	(1,871)	(3,704)	-	(1,475)	14,619	10,384	(7,490)	-	17,513
Income tax expense	-	-	55	-	55	-	-	4,352	-	4,352
Income (loss) from continuing operations	4,100	(1,871)	(3,759)	-	(1,530)	14,619	10,384	(11,842)	-	13,161
Loss from discontinued operations	-	-	-	(24,021)	(24,021)	-	-	-	(570)	(570)
Net income (loss)	$ 4,100	$ (1,871)	$ (3,759)	$ (24,021)	$ (25,551)	$ 14,619	$ 10,384	$ (11,842)	$ (570)	$ 12,591



	For the nine months ended September 30, 2017					For the three months ended March 31, 2019
	Specialty finance	Payments	Corporate	Discontinued operations	Total	Specialty finance	Payments	Corporate	Discontinued operations	Total
	(in thousands)					(in thousands)
Interest income	$ 59,861	$ -	$ 31,315	$ -	$ 91,176	$ 30,473	$ -	$ 13,105	$ -	$ 43,578
Interest allocation	-	31,315	(31,315)	-	-	-	13,105	(13,105)	-	-
Interest expense	2,627	7,567	989	-	11,183	368	8,384	816	-	9,568
Net interest income	57,234	23,748	(989)	-	79,993
Provision	2,150	-	-	-	2,150
Net interest income (loss)						30,105	4,721	(816)	-	34,010
Provision for credit losses						1,700	-	-	-	1,700
Non-interest income	24,507	45,625	1,267	-	71,399	11,777	18,548	40	-	30,365
Non-interest expense	42,251	54,829	21,949	-	119,029	15,357	16,459	7,413	-	39,229
Income (loss) from continuing operations before taxes	37,340	14,544	(21,671)	-	30,213	24,825	6,810	(8,189)	-	23,446
Income tax benefit	-	-	(457)	-	(457)
Income tax expense						-	-	6,035	-	6,035
Income (loss) from continuing operations	37,340	14,544	(21,214)	-	30,670	24,825	6,810	(14,224)	-	17,411
Income from discontinued operations	-	-	-	3,438	3,438	-	-	-	519	519
Net income (loss)	$ 37,340	$ 14,544	$ (21,214)	$ 3,438	$ 34,108	$ 24,825	$ 6,810	$ (14,224)	$ 519	$ 17,930



	September 30, 2017					March 31, 2020
	Specialty finance	Payments	Corporate	Discontinued operations	Total	Specialty finance	Payments	Corporate	Discontinued operations	Total
	(in thousands)					(in thousands)
Total assets	$ 1,818,646	$ 38,155	$ 1,821,823	$ 314,994	$ 3,993,618	$ 3,735,854	$ 48,361	$ 1,539,775	$ 134,118	$ 5,458,108
Total liabilities	$ 645,265	$ 2,702,958	$ 305,934	$ -	$ 3,654,157	$ 260,220	$ 3,977,947	$ 721,837	$ -	$ 4,960,004



	December 31, 2016					December 31, 2019
	Specialty finance	Payments	Corporate	Discontinued operations	Total	Specialty finance	Payments	Corporate	Discontinued operations	Total
	(in thousands)					(in thousands)
Total assets	$ 2,019,180	$ 27,935	$ 2,450,288	$ 360,711	$ 4,858,114	$ 3,008,304	$ 57,746	$ 2,450,256	$ 140,657	$ 5,656,963
Total liabilities	$ 596,574	$ 3,401,142	$ 561,435	$ -	$ 4,559,151	$ 247,485	$ 4,030,921	$ 894,060	$ -	$ 5,172,466

The Company performed a strategic evaluation of its businesses in the third quarter of 2014 and decided to discontinue its Philadelphia commercial lending operations to focus on its specialty finance lending. The loans which constitute the commercial loan portfolio are in the process of ~~disposition.~~disposition including transfers to other financial institutions. As such, financial results of the commercial lending operations are presented as separate from continuing operations on the consolidated statements of operations, and assets of the commercial lending operations to be disposed are presented as assets ~~held for sale~~held-for-sale on the consolidated balance sheets.

The following table presents financial results of the commercial lending business included in net income (loss) from discontinued operations for the three months ended March 31, 2020 and ~~nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016~~2019 (in thousands).



	September 30,	December 31,	March 31,	December 31,
	2017	2016	2020	2019
Loans, net	$ 277,385	$ 340,396	$ 111,008	$ 115,879
Other real estate owned	37,609	20,315	23,110	24,778
Total assets	$ 314,994	$ 360,711	$ 134,118	$ 140,657

~~The Company utilizes~~Non-interest expense included fair value adjustments of $819,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2020 and $0 for the three months ended March 31, 2019. Discontinued operations loans are recorded at the lower of their cost or ~~market valuations for~~fair value. Fair value is determined using a discontinued ~~operations loans which~~cash flow analysis where projections of cash flows are ~~updated based on internal loan officers’ information, third party consultant information,~~developed in consideration of internal loan review analysis and ~~third party review~~default/prepayment assumptions for smaller pools of ~~impairments. Based on that review, weighted average fair values were applied~~loans. These credit and collateral related assumptions are subject to ~~the loans not specifically reviewed.~~uncertainty. The results of discontinued operations do not include any future severance payments. Of the approximately $1.1 billion in book value of loans in that portfolio as of the September 30, 2014 date of discontinuance of operations, ~~$315.0~~$134.1 million of loans and other real estate owned remain in assets ~~held for sale~~held-for-sale on the March 31, 2020 consolidated balance sheet as a result of loan sales, principal paydowns and fair value ~~charges.~~charges as of March 31, 2020. The Company is attempting to ~~sell~~dispose of those remaining ~~loans.~~ loans and other real estate owned.

Additionally, the consolidated balance sheet reflects ~~$107.7~~$34.3 million in investment in unconsolidated entity, which is comprised of notes owned by the Company as a result of the sale of certain discontinued loans to Walnut Street ~~see~~(see Note 8, Fair Value ~~Measurements.~~ Measurements). The investment in Walnut Street is classified as continuing operations in the accompanying consolidated financial statements.

The Company evaluated its ~~September 30, 2017~~March 31, 2020 consolidated financial statements for subsequent events through the date the consolidated financial statements were issued. A planned sale by the Bank of approximately $825 million of commercial real estate loans scheduled for April 2020 was not consummated by the purchaser. The purchaser had deposited $12.5 million with the Bank, which was to be forfeited should they not consummate the purchase. The Company has been advised and has concluded that, under the relevant circumstances, the Bank is ~~not aware~~entitled to retain the deposit. The Bank intends to recognize the deposit as income in a time and manner consistent with applicable accounting rules.

The Paycheck Protection Program provides for our making loans as an SBA lender which are fully guaranteed by the U.S. government to allow businesses to continue funding their payrolls and related costs . As of ~~any subsequent events~~April 28, 2020, we have originated approximately 1,250 Paycheck Protection Program loans, totaling in excess of $200 million, which ~~would require recognition or disclosure~~we expect will generate approximately $5.5 million of fees and interest. We believe that income will be recognized primarily in the ~~financial statements, not otherwise disclosed herein.~~second quarter of 2020. The average loan size was approximately $165,000 with 92% of the loans under $350,000.

Part I - Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

When used in this Form 10-Q, the words “believes”, “anticipates”, “expects” and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. Such statements are subject to certain risks and uncertainties more particularly described in Item 1A, under the caption “Risk Factors,” in this Form 10-Q and our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, ~~2016~~2019 and in other of our public filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. These risks and uncertainties could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed or implied in this Form 10-Q. We caution readers not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date hereof. We undertake no obligation to publicly revise or update these forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date of this ~~report~~Form 10-Q except as required by applicable law.

In the following discussion we provide information about our results of operations, financial condition, liquidity and asset quality. We intend that this information facilitate your understanding and assessment of significant changes and trends related to our financial condition and results of operations. You should read this section in conjunction with “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, ~~2016.~~2019.

The Coronavirus has impacted our financial performance. Our net income of $12.6 million for the first quarter of 2020 reflected pre-tax charges of approximately $6.8 million for unrealized losses which were directly related to the Coronavirus’s economic impact in March 2020. The largest component of the $6.8 million was fair value charges related to commercial real estate loans held for sale (“CRE”), and related hedges, which reduced pre-tax earnings by $5.1 million, with additional such charges of approximately $819,000 in discontinued operations. The balance of the $6.8 million was primarily comprised of an adjustment to the provision for credit losses, resulting from future economic uncertainty. As a result of the potentially unique impact of the Coronavirus, we have added new loan tables under “Financial Condition-Loan Portfolio”. The $57.9 million of hotel loans in our commercial loans held for sale portfolio may represent an elevated risk. However, the vast majority of that $1.50 billion portfolio are multi-family loans, which by a nationally recognized analytics firm have an expected Coronavirus cumulative loss rate of less than 1%. Our next largest $1.16 billion loan portfolio consists of SBLOC and IBLOC loans which have not incurred losses, notwithstanding the recent historic declines in equity markets. Approximately half of the SBA loan portfolio is U.S. government guaranteed, and the U.S. government is paying principal and interest on those loans for a six month period. The majority of the other SBA loans consist of commercial mortgages with 50 to 60% origination date loan to value.For leases which experience credit issues, we have recourse to the leased vehicles. While there is uncertainty related to the future, we believe these are positive characteristics of our loan portfolio which demonstrate lower risk than other forms of lending. The $6.8 million of unrealized losses noted above could reverse in the future, depending on market conditions, interest rates and loan performance, but if losses materialize, that amount represents future potential offsets against such future losses.

U.S. government efforts to address the economic impact of the Coronavirus include several actions which will directly impact us as follows.

We are a Delaware financial holding company and our primary subsidiary, which we wholly ~~owned,~~own, is The Bancorp Bank, which we refer to as the Bank. The vast majority of our revenue and income is currently generated through the Bank. In our continuing ~~lending~~ operations, we have four primary lines of specialty lending: securities-backed lines of credit ~~or SBLOC, automobile fleet~~(SBLOC) and ~~other equipment~~insurance policy cash value-backed lines of credit (IBLOC), leasing (direct lease financing), Small Business Administration ~~or SBA, and~~(SBA) loans, and loans generated for sale into capital markets primarily through commercial loan securitizations ~~or CMBS.~~(CMBS). SBLOCs and IBLOCs are loans which are generated through institutional banking affinity groups and are respectively collateralized by marketable ~~securities.~~securities and the cash value of insurance policies. SBLOCs are typically offered in conjunction with brokerage accounts and are offered nationally. ~~Automobile~~Vehicle fleet and other equipment leases are generated in a number of Atlantic ~~coast~~Coast and other states. SBA loans and commercial loans generated for sale ~~into CMBS capital markets~~ are made nationally.

InThe majority of our deposit accounts and non-interest income are generated in our payments business line which consists of consumer deposit accounts accessed by prepaid or debit cards, or issuing, automated clearing house, or ACH accounts and the collection of payments through credit card companies on behalf of merchants. The issuing deposit accounts are comprised of debit and prepaid card accounts that are generated with the assistance of independent companies that market directly to end users. Our issuing deposit account types are diverse and include: consumer and business debit, general purpose reloadable prepaid, pre-tax medical spending benefit, payroll, gift, government, corporate incentive, reward, business payment accounts and others. Our ACH accounts facilitate payments such as bill payments, and our acquiring accounts provide clearing and settlement services for payments made to merchants which must be settled through associations such as Visa or MasterCard. We also provide banking ~~operations, we focus on providing our~~ services ~~on a national basis~~ to organizations with a pre-existing customer base ~~who can use one or more selected banking services~~ tailored to support or complement the services provided by these organizations to their customers. These services include ~~private label banking; credit~~loan and ~~debit card processing~~deposit accounts for ~~merchants affiliated with independent service organizations; and prepaid cards, also known as stored value cards, for insurers, incentive plans, large retail chains and consumer service organizations.~~investment advisory companies through our institutional banking department. We typically provide these services under the name and through the facilities of each organization with whom we develop a relationship. We refer to this, generally, as affinity ~~group~~ banking. ~~Our private label banking, merchant processing and prepaid card programs are a source of fee income and low-cost deposits.~~

In the third quarter of 2014, we decided to discontinue our Philadelphia-based commercial lending operations. The loans which constitute that portfolio are in the process of disposition. This represents a strategic shift to a focus on our national specialty lending programs, including small fleet leasing, SBLOC, CMBS origination and SBA lending. We have been and anticipate using the proceeds from disposition to acquire investment securities and to provide liquidity to fund growth in our continuing specialty lending lines. Yields we obtain from reinvestment of the proceeds will be subject to economic and other conditions at the time of reinvestment, including market interest rates, many of which will be beyond our control. We cannot predict whether income resulting from the reinvestment of loans we hold for sale resulting from discontinued operations will match or exceed the amount from the sold loans. Of the approximate $1.1 billion in book value of loans in that commercial and residential portfolio as of the September 30, 2014 date of discontinuance of operations, ~~$315.0~~$134.1 million of loans and other real estate owned remain in assets ~~held for sale~~held-for-sale from discontinued operations on the March 31, 2020 balance sheet, which reflects the impact of related sales, paydowns and fair value charges. Additionally, ~~the~~that balance sheet reflects ~~$107.7~~$34.3 million in investment in unconsolidated entity, Walnut Street, which is comprised of notes owned by the Company as a result of the sale of certain discontinued loans. In

Our pre-tax income was $17.5 million for the ~~third~~first quarter of 2020 compared with $23.4 million of pre-tax income for the ~~independent investor~~first quarter of 2019. First quarter 2020 pre-tax income was net of $5.1 million of unrealized losses on commercial loans held for sale related to economic conditions resulting from the Coronavirus. Of the $5.2 million, approximately $2.9 million reflected fair value charges on commercial loans held for sale, and $2.2 million related to fair value adjustments on hedges on the fixed rate portion of that portfolio. The vast majority of the $2.2 million charge relates to hedges expiring in ~~Walnut Street took actions which~~2025 and 2026. Accordingly, these losses could reverse should

applicable market interest rates increase over that period. Possible reversal of the $2.9 million of fair value charges will depend on market conditions, interest rates and loan performance. The majority of the $2.9 million resulted from estimated fair value adjustments for $57.9 million of hotel loans. These hotel loans may ~~result in litigation which may result in financial loss~~reflect an elevated risk compared to the ~~Bank, although~~rest of the $1.50 billion CRE portfolio, the vast majority of which consists of multi-family loans. Expected cumulative losses for multi- family loans resulting from Coronavirus are projected by a nationally recognized analytics firm to be below 1%. These loans generally are on our books at a 99 dollar price, net of fees, and have weighted average interest rate floors in the ~~opinion~~4.8% range. The $17.5 million reported pre-tax income, adjusted for the $5.1 million of ~~counsel that is unlikely (see note 13~~unrealized losses amounts to ~~the financial statements).~~

~~The results of~~$22.6 million. Pre-tax income for the first ~~nine months~~quarter of ~~2017 reflected a return~~2019, adjusted for $10.7 million of realized and unrealized gains on loans held for sale, amounted to ~~profitability, consistent with our business plan and budget.~~$12.7 million. The ~~improvement reflected revenue growth, expense reductions, the conclusion of BSA lookback expense~~resulting $9.9 million increase in ~~2016 and credit related charges in discontinued operations in 2016. Year to date net~~pre-tax income ~~for 2017 was $34.1 million. Continuing growth~~primarily reflects an increase in net interest income ~~resulted~~due to loan growth. Net interest income increased $8.9 million reflecting a $5.6 million increase in interest on CRE loans originated for securitization. Related average balances approximately doubled between these periods to $1.12 billion from ~~loan growth including~~$545.6 million. Net interest income also reflected interest increases of $1.6 million for SBA and $1.2 million for leasing. SBLOC ~~balances which grew 16% year~~and IBLOC loans totaled $1.16 billion at March 31, 2020, representing a 46% increase over ~~year with leasing and SBA balances each growing 11% year over year. In addition to the impact~~March 31, 2019. Related interest income increased $913,000 as these variable rate loans repriced lower as a result of ~~loan growth,~~75 basis points of Federal Reserve interest rate ~~increases also~~reductions in 2019. Small business loans, substantially all of which are SBA, increased to $595.1 million, or 20.5%, while leases increased to $446.0 million, or 15.9%. The growth in these categories reflected progress toward our 2020 strategic plan, which included growth strategies unique to each of those portfolios. CRE loan originations were increased compared to first quarter 2019, which resulted in their higher average balances and resulting higher interest ~~income, while interest expense increased~~income. The semi-annual sales of CRE loans into securitizations have previously contributed to ~~a lesser extent.~~non-interest income. Should those loans not be sold, they would be held as earning assets, resulting in higher average balances. The Bank’s largest funding source, prepaid and debit card ~~deposits,~~accounts, contractually adjust to only a ~~fraction~~portion of increases or decreases in market rates. ~~Expense reductions also contributed to~~In the first nine months of 2017 earnings, and non-interest expense was $8.3 million less than the first nine months of 2016, excluding Bank Secrecy Act lookback expenses. Additional expense reductions are being pursued and may impact future periods; however, timing of such expense reductions is difficult to project. In the third quarter of ~~2017,~~2020, the ~~FDIC notified~~rate on all funding was 0.70%, which is expected to fall below 0.40% for the ~~Bank that it intended~~second quarter. The growth by quarter end to ~~pursue a civil money penalty~~$1.50 billion of CRE loans with an estimated weighted average interest rate floor of 4.80% reduced rate exposure. Substantially all of these loans will therefore not reprice lower to ~~be paid~~historic 1.5% interest rate reductions by the ~~Bank. While~~Federal Reserve in March 2020. The $1.16 billion quarter end portfolio of SBLOC and IBLOC loans, which yielded approximately 3.5% in first quarter 2020, is estimated to yield 2.3% after the

~~Bank is still evaluating its position with respect to the penalty, $2.5 million~~ 1.50% of ~~expense was accrued in the third quarter (see note 13 to the financial statements).~~rate reductions. Prepaid and debit card and related fees are the largest driver of non-interest income. ~~Fees~~Such fees increased to $18.5 million, or 15%, in ~~the~~ first ~~nine months of 2017 were comparable~~quarter 2020 compared to ~~the~~ first ~~nine months of 2016 reflecting the exit of a client which changed ownership and the termination of several programs whose sponsors decided~~quarter 2019. For those periods, non-interest expense decreased 2.1% to ~~exit prepaid cards. Those volumes were partially offset by organic growth in other programs. A decrease in assets from $4.2 billion~~$38.4 million. The holding company leverage ratio was 8.90% at ~~September 30, 2016 to $4.0 billion at September 30, 2017 reflected the exit of less profitable deposit relationships.~~March 31, 2020.

Our accounting and reporting policies conform with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States and general practices within the financial services industry. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and the accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those estimates. We believe that the determination of our allowance for ~~loan~~credit losses on loans, leases and ~~lease losses,~~securities, our determination of the fair value of financial instruments and the level in which an instrument is placed within the valuation hierarchy, ~~our determination of other than temporary impairment,~~ and income taxes involve a higher degree of judgment and complexity than our other significant accounting policies.

We determine our allowance for ~~loan and lease~~credit losses with the objective of maintaining a reserve level we believe to be sufficient to absorb our estimated probable credit losses. We base our determination of the adequacy of the allowance on periodic evaluations of our loan portfolio and other relevant factors. However, this evaluation is inherently subjective as it requires material estimates, including, among others, expected default probabilities, the amount of loss we may incur on a defaulted loan, expected commitment usage, the amounts and timing of expected future cash flows on ~~impaired~~credit deteriorated loans, value of collateral, estimated losses on consumer loans and residential mortgages, and ~~general amounts for~~ historical loss experience. We also evaluate economic conditions and uncertainties in estimating losses and inherent risks in our loan portfolio. To the extent actual outcomes differ from our estimates, we may need additional provisions for loan losses. Any such additional provisions for loan losses will be a direct charge to our earnings. See “Allowance for ~~Loan and Lease~~Credit Losses”.

The fair value of a financial instrument is defined as the amount at which the instrument could be exchanged in a current transaction between willing parties, other than in a forced or liquidation sale. We estimate the fair value of a financial instrument using a variety of valuation methods. Where financial instruments are actively traded and have quoted market prices, quoted market prices are used for fair value. When the financial instruments are not actively traded, other observable market inputs, such as quoted prices of securities with similar characteristics, may be used, if available, to determine fair value. When observable market prices do not exist, we estimate fair value. Our valuation methods and inputs consider factors such as types of underlying assets or liabilities, rates of estimated credit losses, interest rate or discount rate and collateral. Our best estimate of fair value involves assumptions including, but not limited to, various performance indicators, such as historical and projected default and recovery rates, credit ratings, current delinquency rates, loan-to-value ratios and the possibility of obligor refinancing.

At the end of each quarter, we assess the valuation hierarchy for each asset or liability measured. From time to time, assets or liabilities may be transferred within hierarchy levels due to changes in availability of observable market inputs to measure fair value at the measurement date. Transfers into or out of hierarchy levels are based upon the fair value at the beginning of the reporting period.

We periodically review our investment portfolio to determine whether unrealized losses on securities ~~are temporary,~~result from credit, based on evaluations of the creditworthiness of the issuers or guarantors, and underlying collateral, as applicable. In addition, we consider the continuing performance of the securities. We recognize credit losses through the ~~income statement.~~Consolidated Statements of Operations. If management believes market value losses are ~~temporary and that we have the ability and intention to hold those securities to maturity,~~not credit related, we recognize the reduction in other comprehensive income, through equity. We evaluate whether a credit loss exists by considering primarily the following factors: (a) the length of time and extent to which the fair value has been less than the amortized cost of the security, (b) changes in the financial condition, credit rating and near-term prospects of the issuer, (c) whether the issuer is current on contractually obligated interest and principal payments, (d) changes in the financial condition of the security’s underlying collateral and (e) the payment structure of the security. If a credit loss is determined, we estimate expected future cash flows to estimate the credit loss amount with a quantitative and qualitative process that incorporates information received from third-party sources and internal assumptions and judgments regarding the future performance of the security.

We account for our stock-based compensation plans based on the fair value of the awards made, which include stock options, restricted stock, and performance based shares. To assess the fair value of the awards made, management makes assumptions as to expected stock price volatility, option terms, forfeiture rates and dividend rates. All of these estimates and assumptions may be susceptible to significant change that may impact earnings in future periods.

We account for income taxes under the liability method whereby we determine deferred tax assets and liabilities based on the difference between the carrying values on our consolidated financial statements and the tax basis of assets and liabilities as measured by the enacted tax rates which will be in effect when these differences reverse. Deferred tax expense (benefit) is the result of changes in deferred tax assets and liabilities. ~~We currently use the tax expenses as calculated on year-to-date numbers, since small changes in annual estimates would have a significant change in the annual effective rate.~~

We have adjusted our financial statement presentation for items related to discontinued operations. Separately, we have restated our financial statements for periods from 2010 through September 30, 2014, the last date through which financial statements previously had been filed prior to our 2015 filing of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014. The restatement reflected the recognition of provisions for loan losses and loan charge-offs for discontinued operations in periods earlier than those in which those charges were initially recognized. The majority of these loan charges were originally recognized in 2014, primarily in the third quarter, when commercial lending operations were discontinued. An additional $28.5 million of discontinued operations losses that were not previously reported were included within these periods. Also, $12.7 million of losses incurred in 2015 related to loans that were resolved

before the issuance date of our financial statements and were reflected in our 2014 financial statements. Substantially all of the losses and corresponding restatement adjustments resulted from the discontinued commercial loan operations.

The Bank ~~has~~ entered into a Stipulation and Consent to the Issuance of a Consent Order effective August 7, 2012, which we refer to as the 2012 Consent Order. The Bank took this action without admitting or denying any charges of unsafe or unsound banking practices or violations of law or regulation. Under the 2012 Consent Order, the Bank agreed to increase its supervision of third-party relationships, develop new written compliance and related internal audit compliance programs, develop a new third-party risk management program and screen new third-party relationships as provided in the Consent Order. As part of the Consent Order, the Bank agreed to pay a civil money penalty in the amount of $172,000, which was paid in 2012. The 2012 Consent Order was amended and restated in 2015 as noted below.

On June 5, 2014, the Bank entered into a Stipulation and Consent to the Issuance of a Consent Order with the ~~Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, or~~ FDIC, which ~~became effective on September 5, 2014.~~we refer to as the 2014 Consent Order. The Bank took this action without admitting or denying any charges of unsafe or unsound banking practices or violations of law or regulation relating to the Bank’s Bank Secrecy Act, or BSA, compliance program.

The 2014 Consent Order requires the Bank to take certain affirmative actions to comply with its BSA ~~obligations, among them: appoint a qualified BSA/OFAC (Office~~obligations. Satisfaction of Foreign Assets Control) officer; revise the written BSA Compliance Program; develop and implement additional policies and procedures for suspicious activity monitoring and reporting; review and enhance customer due diligence and risk assessment processes; review past account activity to determine whether suspicious activity was properly identified and reported; strengthen internal controls, including augmenting oversight by the Bank’s Board of Directors of BSA activities; establish an independent testing program; and develop policies and procedures to govern staffing and training for BSA compliance.

~~To date, the Bank has implemented multiple upgrades that address~~ the requirements of the 2014 Consent Order ~~such as appointing a qualified BSA/OFAC officer, increasing oversight and staffing~~is subject to the review of the FDIC and the Delaware State Bank Commissioner. The Bank has and expects to continue to expend significant management and financial resources to address the Bank’s BSA compliance ~~function, improving practices~~program which will reduce our net income. Expenses associated with the required look back review were significant in 2015 and ~~procedures to monitor and report transactions, and increasing training, as well as adopting an independent testing program to ensure adherence to more effective BSA standards.~~ 2016. The look back review was completed in the third quarter of 2016.

~~Until the Bank submits to the FDIC (and the FDIC approves) a BSA report summarizing the completion of its corrective actions, the~~The 2014 Consent Order ~~places some restrictions on certain activities as follows:~~restricts the Bank ~~is restricted~~ from signing and boarding new independent sales organizations, ~~issuing new non-benefit related reloadable prepaid card programs,~~ establishing new ~~distribution channels for existing~~ non-benefit reloadable prepaid card programs and originating Automated Clearing House transactions for new merchant-related ~~payments.~~payments until the Bank submits to the FDIC and the Delaware State Bank Commissioner a report summarizing the completion of certain BSA-related corrective actions (“BSA Report”). Until ~~we receive~~ the ~~FDIC’s approval, restrictions~~BSA Report is approved by the FDIC and Delaware State Bank Commissioner, those aspects of the growth of our card payment processing and prepaid card operations will be affected, which, unless offset by growth from existing customers and new customers in ~~these specific~~other areas ~~may potentially impact their growth. We do not believe that these restrictions will have a material impact~~of our prepaid card operations, could reduce growth of our deposits and non-interest income and, possibly, limit our ability to raise additional capital on ~~current revenue levels.~~acceptable terms. The Bank ~~utilized one primary consultant related to its BSA-AML (Anti-Money Laundering) program refinement~~provided the FDIC and one primary consultant related to conducting a lookback review of historical transactions to confirm that suspicious activity was properly identified and reported in accordance with applicable law. The consultant assistingthe Delaware State Bank Commissioner with the ~~BSA-AML program refinement completed its work in 2014. The consultant performing~~required BSA Report as of December 31, 2019 and it still is under review by the ~~BSA lookback completed its work in July 2016, and no additional related fees are expected to be incurred. Suspicious activity reports resulting from the lookback have been filed.~~regulators.

On August 27, 2015, the Bank entered into an Amendment to Consent Order, or the 2014 Consent Order Amendment, with the FDIC, amending the 2014 Consent Order. The Bank took this action without admitting or denying any additional charges of unsafe or unsound banking practices or violations of law or regulation relating to continued weaknesses in the Bank’s BSA compliance program. The 2014 Consent Order Amendment provides that the Bank ~~may~~shall not declare or pay any dividend without the prior written consent of the FDIC and for certain assurances regarding management.

On May 11, 2015, the Federal Reserve issued a letter, or the Supervisory Letter, to ~~the Bank~~us as a result of the 2014 Consent Order and the 2014 Consent Order Amendment (which, at the time of the Supervisory Letter, was in proposed form), which provides that we ~~may~~shall not pay any dividends on our common stock ~~make any distributions to our European entities~~ or make any interest payments on our trust preferred securities, without the prior written approval of the Federal Reserve. It further provides that we may not incur any debt (excluding payables in the ordinary course of business) or redeem any shares of our stock, without the prior written approval of the Federal Reserve. The ~~Federal Reserve approved the payment of the interest on our trust preferred securities which~~requirement for such approval was ~~due September 15, 2017. Future payments are subjectto future approval~~lifted by the Federal ~~Reserve.~~Reserve in the fourth quarter of 2019, and the Supervisory Letter was terminated at that time.

On December 23, 2015, the Bank entered into a Stipulation and Consent to the Issuance of an Amended Consent Order, Order for Restitution, and Order to Pay Civil Money Penalty with the FDIC, which we refer to as the 2015 Consent Order. The Bank took this action without admitting or denying any charges of violations of law or regulation. The 2015 Consent Order ~~supercedes~~amended and restated in its entirety the terms of ~~a previous consent order entered into in 2012.~~the 2012 Consent Order.

The 2015 Consent Order was based on FDIC allegations regarding electronic fund transfer, or EFT, error resolution practices, account termination practices and fee practices of various third parties with whom the Bank had previously provided, or currently provides, deposit-related products ~~which~~whom we refer to as Third Parties. The specific operational practices of the third parties identified by the FDIC were the following: practices related to the termination of a third-party rewards program tied to deposit accounts, including the timing of the notice of termination, and the disclosure of the effects of such termination on the consumer’s ability to obtain unredeemed rewards; practices performed by third parties related to the time frames within which we must respond to a consumer’s notice of error related to electronic transactions related to various types of deposit accounts; and, practices related to the timing and frequency of disclosed account fees and the manner by which the accountholder is notified of these fees in periodic statements which are generated by third parties. The 2015 Consent Order continues the Bank's obligations originally set forth in the 2012 Consent Order, including its obligations to increase board oversight of the Bank's compliance management system, or CMS, improve the Bank's CMS, enhance its

internal audit program, increase its management and oversight of Third Parties, and correct any apparent violations of law. The

In addition to restating the general terms of the 2012 Consent Order, the 2015 Consent Order ~~also~~ directs the Bank’s Board of Directors to establish a Complaint and Error Claim Oversight and Review Committee, which we refer to as the Complaint and Error Claim Committee to review and oversee the Bank’s processes and practices for handling, monitoring and resolving consumer complaints and EFT error claims (whether received directly or through Third Parties) and to review management's plans for correcting any weaknesses that may be found in such processes and practices; and implement a corrective action plan regarding those prepaid cardholders who asserted or attempted to assert EFT error claims and to provide restitution to cardholders harmed by EFT error resolution practices. The Bank’s Board of Directors appointed the required Complaint and Error Claim Committee on January 29, 2016.

The 2015 Consent Order also requires the Bank to implement a corrective action plan, or CAP, to remediate and provide restitution to those prepaid cardholders who asserted or attempted to assert, or were discouraged from initiating EFT error claims, and to provide restitution to cardholders harmed by EFT error resolution practices.The 2015 Consent Order requires that if, through the CAP, the Bank identifies prepaid cardholders who have been adversely affected by a denial or failure to resolve an EFT error claim, the Bank will ensure that monetary restitution is ~~in process.~~made. The Bank completed its implementation of the CAP on January 15, 2020. As of the completion date, $1,592,469.20 of restitution was paid to consumers of which $4,352.61 was paid by the Bank and the remaining amount by Third Parties.

~~We received~~The 2015 Consent Order also imposed a ~~subpoena from~~$3 million civil money penalty on the ~~SEC, dated March 22, 2016, relating to an investigation by~~Bank, which the ~~SEC~~Bank has paid and which was recognized as expense in the fourth quarter of 2015.

On December 18, 2019, the Bank’s Board of Directors, without admitting or denying any violations of law, regulation or the provisions of the ~~restatement of our financial statements for the years ended December 31, 2010 through December 31, 2013~~2014 Consent Order, executed a Stipulation and the interim periods ended March 31, 2014, September 30, 2014 and September 30, 2014, which restatement was filed with the SEC on September 28, 2015, and the facts and circumstances underlying the restatement. We are cooperating fully with the SEC's investigation. The costs to respondConsent to the ~~subpoena and cooperate with the SEC's investigation have been material, and we expect such costs to continue to be material at least through the completion~~Issuance of ~~the SEC’s investigation.~~

On October 5, 2016, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) released its final Prepaid Card Rule (Final Prepaid Rule), which it first proposed by publication on December 23, 2014. The general effective date of the Final Prepaid Rule was October 1, 2017, but applicability of certain requirements of the Final Prepaid Rule are delayed until October 1, 2018. However, on April 20, 2017 the CFPB released a final rule delaying the general effective date of the Final Prepaid Rule until April 1, 2018. The Final Prepaid Rule regulates certain prepaid products, including physical cards as well as codes and other access devices. The Final Prepaid Rule did not materially deviate from the terms of the proposed rule that we have disclosed in previous filings. The Final Prepaid Rule among other things, causes prepaid products to be fully-covered by Regulation E, which implements the Electronic Fund Transfer Act, and to be covered by Regulation Z, which implements the Truth in Lending Act, to the extent the prepaid product accesses a “credit” feature.

The Final Prepaid Rule and related commentary is over 1,600 pages in length and provides significant discussion, materials and commentary that we are currently assessing. The Final Prepaid Rule includes a significant number of changes to the regulatory framework for prepaid products, some of which include: (a) establishing a definition of “prepaid account” within Regulation E that includes reloadable and non-reloadable physical cards, as well as codes or other devices, and focuses on how the product is issued and used; (b) modifying Regulation E to require that short form and long form disclosures be provided to a consumer prior to a consumer agreeing to acquire a prepaid account with certain exceptions and with specified forms that, if used, would provide a safe harbor for financial institutions; (c) extending to prepaid accounts the periodic transaction history and statement requirements of Regulation E, with certain specified permissible alternatives to the provision of periodic statements; (d) extending the error resolution and limited liability provisions of Regulation E to prepaid cards, with some modifications specific to prepaid cards; (e) requiring financial institutions to provide prepaid account agreements to the CFPB and to either post them to the issuer’s website or provide them upon request of the consumer in specified manner and timeframes; (f) extending Regulation Z’s credit card rules and disclosure requirements to prepaid accounts that provide overdraft protection and other credit features and incorporating into Regulation Z a new definition of “hybrid prepaid-credit card”; (g) requiring an issuer to obtain a prepaid account holder’s consent prior to adding overdraft services or other credit features and prohibiting the issuer from adding overdraft services or other credit features for at least 30 calendar days after a consumer registers the prepaid account; and (h) prohibiting the application of different terms and conditions, such as charging different fees, to a prepaid account depending on whether the consumer elects to link the prepaid account to overdraft services or other credit features.

The Final Prepaid Rule represents a material change in the rules and regulations governing prepaid cards. We rely on prepaid cards as the largest single component of our deposits and the largest single component of our non-interest income. We are continuing to evaluate the Prepaid Card Rule and the impact it may have on our business and our results of operations. We are in the process of evaluating and building implementation plans for the Prepaid Card Rule and, as such, we cannot reasonably quantify the financial impact, if any, that implementation of the Prepaid Card Rule may have on the Bank’s business, financial condition, or results of operations.

On July 10, 2017, the CFPB issued a final rule to regulate arbitration agreements in contracts for specified consumer financial product and services (Arbitration Rule). The Arbitration Rule prohibits covered providers of certain consumer financial products and services from using an agreement with a consumer that provides for arbitration of any future dispute between the parties to bar the consumer from filing or participating in a class action concerning the covered consumer financial product or service. The Arbitration Rule also requires covered providers that are involved in an arbitration pursuant to a pre-dispute arbitration agreement to submit specified arbitral records to the CFPB together with specified court records. The Arbitration Rule becomes effective on March 19, 2018; however, on November 1, 2017, President Trump signed legislation to repeal the Arbitration Rule.

On October 17, 2017, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (the “FDIC”) informed The Bancorp Bank (the “Bank”), a wholly owned subsidiary of The Bancorp, Inc. (the “Company”), that it intends to pursue an Order For Restitution (“Restitution Order”) and Order to Pay Civil Money Penalty ~~(“CMP Order”)~~ in anthe amount upof $7.5 million based on supervisory findings during the period of 2013 to ~~$2,576,000. The FDIC’s action~~2019 related principally ~~emanates from one of~~to deficiencies in the Bank’s ~~third-party payment processors (“Third Party Processor”) suffering~~legacy Bank Secrecy Act/Anti-Money Laundering (BSA/AML) Programs and alleged violations of law during the period, as well as the length of time the Bank has taken to fully implement the corrective actions required by the 2014 Consent Order. The Bank paid this amount, and it was recognized as an ~~internal system programming glitch. This~~expense in the Company’s financial statements in the fourth quarter of 2019.

inadvertently resulted in consumers that engaged in signature-based point of sale transactions during the period from December 2010 to November 2014 being charged a greater fee than what was disclosed by the Bank. Impacted consumers are being reimbursed by the Third Party Processor at its own expense. The Restitution Order would require the Bank to make such reimbursements if not otherwise made by the Third Party Processor, however, the Bank is indemnified by the Third Party Processor for such reimbursements. Although the Bank is still evaluating its position with regard to the Restitution Order and the CMP Order, the Company accrued $2,500,000 of related expense in its financial statements for the quarter ended September 30, 2017 in connection with the CMP Order. Any amounts owed from the CMP Order would not be subject to any indemnification or recovery from any third party.

Net Income:The improvement in net income in third quarter 2017 compared to third quarter 2017 reflected revenue growth, expense reductions, the conclusion of BSA lookback expense in 2016 and credit related charges in discontinued operations in 2016. Net income from continuing operations for the ~~third~~first quarter of ~~2017~~2020 was ~~$6.8~~$13.2 million, or ~~$0.12~~$0.23 per diluted share, compared to ~~net loss of $1.5~~$17.4 million, or ~~$0.03~~$0.31 per diluted share, for the ~~third~~first quarter of ~~2016.~~2019. Pre-tax income from continuing operations before income taxes was $17.5 million in the first quarter of 2020 compared to $23.4 million in the first quarter of 2019. Income from continuing operations decreased between those respective periods primarily as a result of the $5.1 million in unrealized losses on the CRE portfolio in first quarter 2020, versus approximately $10.7 million of realized gains on sales within that portfolio in first quarter 2019. Adjusted for these items, pre-tax income was $22.6 million in first quarter 2020 versus $12.7 million in first quarter 2019, or an increase of $9.9 million. The increase resulted primarily from an $8.9 million increase in net interest income, which reflected loan growth. After discontinued operations, net income for the ~~third~~first quarter of ~~2017 was $7.3~~2020 amounted to $12.6 million, compared to ~~a net loss of $25.6~~$17.9 million for the ~~third~~first quarter of ~~2016.~~2019. Net interest income for the ~~third~~first quarter of ~~2017 compared~~2020 increased 26.2%, to $42.9 million from $34.0 million in the ~~third~~first quarter of ~~2016 increased to $27.9 million from $23.5 million~~2019 primarily as a result of higher loan balances, ~~and higher~~which more than offset the impact of lower yields. The lower yields reflecting the Federal Reserve’s rate increases. The provision for loan and lease losses increased $50,000 to $800,000 in the third quarter of 2017 compared to $750,000 in the third quarter of 2016. Non-interest income (excluding security gains and losses) increased$9.6 million, which resulted primarily from an increase in gain on sale of loans into two securitizations. Non-interest expense in the third quarter of 2017 was comparable to third quarter 2016. Cost reductions in data processing, consulting and other expenses were largely offset by a $2.5 million civil money penalty in third quarter 2017 (see note 13 to the financial statements) and a $1.1 million contractual exit fee. The exit fee was for a data processing contracts which will be significantly exceeded by future savings. Lower data processing expense reflected the impact of the Federal Reserve’s 2019 rate decreases totaling 75 basis points. The provision for credit losses increased $1.9 million to $3.6 million in the first quarter of 2020 compared to $1.7 million in the first quarter of 2019 primarily as a ~~renegotiated data~~result of higher lease provisions. Excluding the respective unrealized losses and realized gains in first quarter 2020 and 2019, as noted above, non-interest income increased $2.2 million. The increase primarily reflected a 10.4% net increase in prepaid and debit card and related fees and ACH, card and other payment processing ~~contract and~~fees, the ~~phase out~~total of ~~an affinity program. A $21.5~~which amounted to $20.4 million ~~loss from discontinued operations~~ in ~~third~~the first quarter ~~2016 resulted primarily from~~of 2020. Non-interest expense decreased $811,000, or 2.1% to $38.4 million in the ~~writedown~~first quarter of ~~a $42~~2020 compared to $39.2 million ~~loan secured by a shopping mall.~~in the first quarter 2019. Diluted income per share was ~~$0.13~~$0.22 in the ~~third~~first quarter of ~~2017~~2020 compared to ~~$0.54 loss~~$0.32 diluted income per share in the ~~third~~first quarter of ~~2016~~2019 primarily reflecting the factors noted above.

Net Interest Income: Our net interest income for the ~~third~~first quarter of ~~2017~~2020 increased to ~~$27.9~~$42.9 million, an increase of ~~$4.4~~$8.9 million, or ~~18.5%~~26.2% from ~~$23.5~~$34.0 million in the ~~third~~first quarter of ~~2016.~~2019. Our interest income for the ~~third~~first quarter of ~~2017~~2020 increased to ~~$31.9~~$51.5 million, an increase of ~~$5.2~~$7.9 million, or ~~19.4%~~18.1% from ~~$26.7~~$43.6 million for the ~~third~~first quarter of ~~2016.~~2019. The increase in interest income resulted primarily from higher loan balances ~~and higher yields.~~which more than offset the impact of lower yields reflecting Federal Reserve interest rate reductions. Our average loans and leases increased to ~~$1.84~~$3.27 billion for the ~~third~~first quarter of ~~2017~~2020 from ~~$1.68~~$2.28 billion for the ~~third~~first quarter of ~~2016,~~2019, an increase of ~~$154.7 million.~~$988.7 million, or 43.3%. Related interest income increased ~~$3.7~~$8.8 million on a tax equivalent basis. The increase in average loans reflected ~~organic~~ growth in ~~leasing,~~CRE loans generated for securitization, SBLOC and IBLOC, SBA and ~~SBLOC lending.~~leasing. Average CRE loans originated for sale into securitizations increased to $1.12 billion from $545.6 million. Of the total $8.8 million increase in loan interest income, the largest increases were $5.6 million for CRE loans originated for sale, $1.6 million for SBA and $1.2 million for leasing. Our average investment securities ~~decreased to $1.25~~of $1.40 billion for the ~~third~~first quarter of ~~2017~~2020 increased slightly from ~~$1.42~~the $1.31 billion for the ~~third~~first quarter of ~~2016, as investment securities were replaced with higher yielding loans. Notwithstanding the decrease in average balances, related~~2019. Related tax equivalent interest income ~~increased $412,000 on a tax equivalent basis as a result of higher yields.~~decreased $55,000. Yields on ~~both~~ loans ~~and investment securities increased~~decreased primarily as a result of the impact of ~~the~~75 basis points of Federal ~~Reserve’s~~Reserve interest rate ~~increases~~reductions in 2019, on variable rate loans and securities. ~~Rates paid on deposits and resulting~~While total interest income increased by $7.9 million, interest expense ~~adjusted only partially~~decreased by $1.0 million as the majority of deposits immediately repriced to Federal Reserve interest rate reductions of 1.50% in March 2020. The repricing resulted from the impact of the Coronavirus which was the impetus for 1.5% of related Federal ~~Reserve’s~~Reserve interest rate ~~increases.~~reductions in that month. The reductions will reduce interest income on variable rate loans in the second quarter of 2020, especially the combined SBLOC and IBLOC portfolio which in the first quarter had an estimated 3.5% yield. That yield is estimated to fall to approximately 2.3% in second quarter 2020. However, a significant amount of the resulting decrease in interest income, and reductions resulting from other variable rate assets, is expected to be offset by two factors. First, the CRE loans held for sale have estimated average interest rate floors of approximately 4.80%, and their period end balance of $1.50 billion compares with an average quarterly balance of $1.12 billion. Additionally, the cost of funds on all liabilities is estimated to fall below 0.40%, from 0.70% in the first quarter of 2020.

Our net interest margin (calculated by dividing net interest income by average interest earning assets) for the ~~third~~first quarter of ~~2017 increased~~2020 was 3.34% compared to ~~3.26% from 2.69% in~~3.41% for the ~~third~~first quarter of ~~2016, an increase~~2019, a decrease of 577 basis points. The ~~increase~~yield on interest earning assets decreased 36 basis points while the cost of deposits and interest bearing liabilities decreased by a lesser 28 basis points, or a net reduction of 8 basis points. The decrease in the net interest margin reflected ~~higher~~lower yields on loans, ~~and~~reflecting the aforementioned Federal Reserve rate decreases. In the first quarter of 2020, the average yield on our loans decreased to 4.80% from 5.32% for the first quarter of 2019, a decrease of 52 basis points. Yields on taxable investment securities in the first quarter of 2020 decreased to 3.01% compared to 3.23% for the first quarter of 2019, a decrease of 22 basis points. The decrease reflected the impact of the aforementioned Federal Reserve interest rate reductions. The interest cost of total deposits and interest bearing liabilities decreased 28 basis points to 0.70% for the first quarter of 2020 compared to 0.98% in the first quarter of 2019 reflecting the impact of the aforementioned Federal Reserve rate increases on variable rate loans and securities. In the third quarter of 2017, the average yield on our loans increased to 4.66% from 4.19% for the third quarter of 2016, an increase of 47 basis points. Yields on taxable investment securities in the third quarter of 2017 increased to 2.86% compared to 2.43% for the third quarter of 2016, an increase of 43 basis points. The net interest margin also benefited from the reinvestment of maturities of investment securities into higher yielding loans.decreases. Average interest earning deposits at the Federal Reserve Bank increased ~~$42.5~~$70.9 million, or ~~13.1%~~16.7%, to ~~$366.7~~$493.9 million in the ~~third~~first quarter of ~~2017~~2020 from ~~$324.2~~$423.0 million in the ~~third~~first quarter of ~~2016.~~2019. That difference ~~reflects~~reflected a minimal percentage of total deposits, and resulted primarily from daily fluctuations in deposits and loans. The interest cost of total deposits and interest bearing liabilities increased to 0.43% for the third quarter of 2017 as compared to 0.33% in the third quarter of 2016. The cost of deposits increased significantly less than the increase in variable rates on loans and investments primarily due to contractual provisions related to prepaid card deposits. Those contracts result in only partial adjustment to Federal Reserve rate increases.

Average Daily Balances. The following table presents the average daily balances of assets, liabilities and ~~stockholders’~~shareholders’ equity and the respective interest earned or paid on interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities, as well as average annualized rates, for the periods indicated:



	Three months ended September 30,						Three months ended March 31,
	2017			2016			2020			2019
	Average		Average	Average		Average	Average		Average	Average		Average
	Balance	Interest	Rate	Balance	Interest	Rate	Balance	Interest	Rate	Balance	Interest	Rate
	(dollars in thousands)						(dollars in thousands)
Assets:
Interest earning assets:
Loans net of unearned fees and costs **	$ 1,816,751	$ 21,147	4.66%	$ 1,661,807	$ 17,425	4.19%	$ 3,262,378	$ 39,159	4.80%	$ 2,266,834	$ 30,161	5.32%
Leases - bank qualified*	20,787	419	8.06%	21,006	418	7.96%	10,975	200	7.29%	17,793	428	9.62%
Investment securities-taxable	1,235,615	8,847	2.86%	1,373,776	8,350	2.43%	1,395,545	10,495	3.01%	1,303,491	10,530	3.23%
Investment securities-nontaxable*	13,238	133	4.02%	48,683	218	1.79%	5,174	39	3.02%	7,546	59	3.13%
Interest earning deposits at Federal Reserve Bank	366,724	1,190	1.30%	324,179	397	0.49%	493,876	1,623	1.31%	423,024	2,502	2.37%
Federal funds sold and securities purchased under agreement to resell	65,008	371	2.28%	39,392	146	1.48%
Net interest earning assets	3,518,123	32,107	3.65%	3,468,843	26,954	3.11%	5,167,948	51,516	3.99%	4,018,688	43,680	4.35%

Allowance for loan and lease losses	(6,961)			(5,267)
Assets held for sale from discontinued operations	325,912	3,098	3.80%	459,400	3,891	3.39%
Allowance for credit losses							(10,176)			(8,638)
Assets held-for-sale from discontinued operations							137,286	1,275	3.71%	173,800	2,025	4.66%
Other assets	235,070			246,171			226,881			234,174
	$ 4,072,144			$ 4,169,147			$ 5,521,939			$ 4,418,024

Liabilities and shareholders' equity:
Deposits:
Demand and interest checking	$ 3,224,167	$ 3,136	0.39%	$ 3,249,801	$ 2,379	0.29%	$ 4,353,690	$ 6,695	0.62%	$ 3,798,837	$ 8,833	0.93%
Savings and money market	439,688	552	0.50%	392,045	423	0.43%	173,575	50	0.12%	31,392	37	0.47%
Time	-	-	0.00%	76,931	104	0.54%	319,505	1,483	1.86%	-	-	-
Total deposits	3,663,855	3,688	0.40%	3,718,777	2,906	0.31%	4,846,770	8,228	0.68%	3,830,229	8,870	0.93%

Short-term borrowings	51,413	175	1.36%	102,243	153	0.60%	56,813	165	1.16%	74,386	503	2.70%
Repurchase agreements	189	-	0.00%	376	-	0.00%	72	-	0.00%	90	-	0.00%
Subordinated debt	13,401	150	4.48%	13,401	131	3.91%	13,401	162	4.84%	13,401	195	5.82%
Total deposits and interest bearing liabilities	3,728,858	4,013	0.43%	3,834,797	3,190	0.33%
Total deposits and liabilities							4,917,056	8,555	0.70%	3,918,106	9,568	0.98%

Other liabilities	8,046			19,670			113,582			79,140
Total liabilities	3,736,904			3,854,467			5,030,638			3,997,246

Shareholders' equity	335,240			314,680			491,301			420,778
	$ 4,072,144			$ 4,169,147			$ 5,521,939			$ 4,418,024

Net interest income on tax equivalent basis *		$ 31,192			$ 27,655			$ 44,236			$ 36,137

Tax equivalent adjustment		193			222			50			102

Net interest income		$ 30,999			$ 27,433			$ 44,186			$ 36,035

Net interest margin *			3.26%			2.69%			3.34%			3.41%

* Full taxable equivalent basis, using a 35% statutory tax rate.
** Includes loans held for sale.
* Full taxable equivalent basis, using 21% respective statutory Federal tax rates in 2020 and 2019.
** Includes loans held-for-sale.

For the ~~third~~first quarter of ~~2017,~~2020, average interest earning assets increased to ~~$3.52~~$5.17 billion, an increase of ~~$49.3 million,~~$1.15 billion, or ~~1.4%~~28.6%, from ~~$3.47~~$4.02 billion in the ~~third~~first quarter of ~~2016.~~2019. The increase reflected ~~increases in~~increased average balances of loans and leases of ~~$154.7~~$988.7 million, or ~~9.2%~~43.3%, and ~~$42.5~~increased average investment securities of $89.7 million, or 13.1%, of average interest earning deposits at the Federal Reserve Bank, net of decreases in average balances of investment securities. For third quarter 2017 compared to third quarter 2016, average securities decreased $173.6 million, or 12.2%, to $1.25 billion from $1.42 billion.6.8%. For those respective periods, average demand and interest ~~checking deposits decreased $25.6 million,~~

checking deposits increased $554.9 million, or ~~0.8%~~14.6%, ~~to $3.22 billion from $3.25 billion. The decrease reflected the planned exit~~primarily as a result of ~~certain less profitable~~ deposit ~~relationships, which was partially offset by~~ growth in ~~payments related deposits.~~ prepaid and debit card accounts. The $142.2 million increase in savings and money market reflected growth in interest-bearing prepaid and debit card account relationships. Time deposits were utilized to fund loan growth, including CRE loan originations for sale into securitizations, and increased $319.5 million.

Provision for ~~Loan and Lease~~Credit Losses. Our provision for ~~loan and lease~~credit losses was ~~$800,000~~$3.6 million for the ~~third~~first quarter of ~~2017~~2020 compared to ~~$750,000~~$1.7 million for the ~~third~~first quarter of ~~2016.~~2019. The allowance for ~~loan~~credit losses increased to ~~$7.3~~$14.9 million, or ~~0.53%~~0.75%, of total loans at ~~September 30, 2017,~~March 31, 2020, from ~~$6.3~~$10.2 million, or ~~0.52%~~0.56%, of total loans at December 31, ~~2016~~. 2019. The majority of the increase reflected higher provisions for leasing, which reflected higher leasing charge-offs during first quarter 2020. The provision also included $849,000 resulting from a qualitative input to current expected credit loss methodology which recognized future potential impact on loan performance from the Coronavirus. See “Recent Developments” for additional impacts of the Coronavirus on our financial performance. We believe that our allowance is adequate to cover expected ~~losses~~losses. For more information about our provision and allowance for ~~loan and lease~~credit losses and our loss experience, see “Financial Condition-Allowance for ~~loan and lease~~credit losses”, “-Net charge-offs,” and “-Non-performing loans, loans 90 days delinquent and still accruing, and troubled debt restructurings,” below and Note 6 to the financial statements.

Non-Interest Income. Non-interest income was ~~$28.5~~$16.6 million in the ~~third~~first quarter of ~~2017~~2020 compared to ~~$18.9~~$30.4 million in the ~~third~~first quarter of ~~2016 before gains on sale of investment securities of $506,000 in the third quarter of 2017 and $981,000 in the third quarter of 2016.~~2019. The ~~$9.6~~$13.8 million, or ~~50.6% increase~~45.3%, decrease between those respective periods primarily reflected ~~an $815,000 decrease~~a variance in net realized and unrealized gains (losses) on commercial loans originated for sale. Unrealized losses on commercial loans originated for sale in first quarter 2020 reflected a charge of $5.1 million compared to a realized gain of approximately $10.7 million in the ~~change in value of investment in unconsolidated entity.~~prior year period, which resulted from a first quarter 2019 securitization. Gain or loss on ~~sale of loans~~securitizations is subject to market conditions. Prepaid and debit card and related fees increased $2.4 million, or 14.7%, to ~~$11.4~~$18.5 million for the ~~third~~first quarter of ~~2017 from $903,000~~2020 compared to $16.2 million in first quarter 2019. The increase reflected higher transaction volume. Related fees in this category include income related to the ~~third quarter~~use of ~~2016 which resulted primarily from the sale of loans into a securitization~~cash in ~~2017. Prepaid~~ATMs for prepaid payroll cardholders. ACH, card and other payment processing fees ~~increased by $242,000~~decreased $457,000, or ~~2.0%~~19.8%, to ~~$12.5~~$1.8 million for the ~~third~~first quarter of ~~2017~~2020 compared to ~~$12.2~~$2.3 million in ~~third quarter 2016. The increase reflected organic growth which more than offset~~ the ~~impact of a client whose ownership changed and clients who decided to terminate card programs. Service fees on deposit accounts increased $190,000 or 12.6% to $1.7 million for the third~~first quarter of 2017 from $1.5 million for the third quarter of 2016, reflecting increases in service charges on safe harbor individual retirement accounts. Leasing income increased $117,000 or 19.9% to $705,000 for the third quarter of 2017 from $588,000 for the third quarter of 2016, which reflected higher gains on disposition of leased vehicles in 2017. Affinity fees decreased by $816,000, or 74.8% to $275,000 for the third quarter of 2017 from $1.1 million for the third quarter of 2016.2019. The decrease resulted from the exit of ~~one affinity relationship whose ownership had changed.~~higher risk ACH customers. Leasing related income increased $138,000, or 19.9%, to $833,000 for the first quarter of 2020 from $695,000 for the first quarter of 2019. Service fees on deposit accounts decreased $37,000, or 78.7%, to $10,000 for the first quarter of 2020 from $47,000 for the first quarter of 2019. Other non-interest income increased ~~$64,000,~~$177,000, or ~~20.5%~~44.9%, to ~~$376,000~~$571,000 for the ~~third~~first quarter of ~~2017~~2020 from ~~$312,000~~$394,000 in the ~~third~~first quarter of ~~2016.~~2019.

Non-Interest Expense. Total non-interest expense was ~~$43.9~~$38.4 million for the ~~third~~first quarter of ~~2017,~~2020, a decrease of ~~$288,000,~~$811,000, or ~~0.7%~~2.1%, compared to ~~$44.2~~$39.2 million for the ~~third~~first quarter of ~~2016.~~2019. Decreases in ~~ongoing data processing~~salaries, legal and consulting expenses ~~consulting fees and BSA lookback expense~~ were partially offset by ~~a proposed $2.5 million civil money penalty which was accrued, a $1.1 million data processing contract exit fee~~increases in FDIC insurance and higher legal expenses. The exit of the data processing contract will result in future savings significantly greater than the exit fee and the BSA lookback expenses concluded in third quarter 2016. The civil money penalty resulted from a programming glitch within one of the Bank’s third party processors. As a result, a higher fee was assessed to consumers for certain point of sale transactions during the period from December 2010 to November 2014.software expense. Salaries and employee benefits ~~increased~~decreased to ~~$21.8~~$22.7 million for the ~~third~~first quarter of ~~2017, an increase~~2020, a decrease of ~~$280,000,~~$1.1 million, or ~~1.3%~~4.6%, from ~~$21.5~~$23.8 million for the ~~third~~first quarter of ~~2016.~~2019. The ~~increase~~decrease reflected lower incentive compensation expense related to the gain on sale of loans into securitizations and other revenue and performance based compensation. Those increases offset the impact of staffing levels which had been reduced compared to the prior year in most departments.expense. Depreciation and amortization decreased ~~$161,000~~$130,000, or ~~13.0%~~13.3%, to ~~$1.1 million~~$844,000 in the ~~third~~first quarter of ~~2017~~2020 from ~~$1.2 million~~$974,000 in the ~~third~~first quarter of ~~2016. The decrease~~2019 which reflected reduced spending on fixed assets and equipment. Rent and occupancy decreased ~~$270,000~~$9,000, or ~~16.5%~~0.6%, to $1.4 million in the ~~third~~first quarter of ~~2017~~2020 from ~~$1.6~~$1.4 million in the ~~third~~first quarter of ~~2016. The decrease reflected a reduction in leased space and more efficient use of office space.~~ 2019. Data processing decreased by ~~$1.6 million,~~$100,000, or ~~45.1%~~7.9%, to ~~$1.9~~$1.2 million in the ~~third~~first quarter of ~~2017~~2020 from ~~$3.5~~$1.3 million in the ~~third~~first quarter of ~~2016.~~2019. The decrease reflected the impact of ~~a renegotiated data processing contract and~~ lower account and transaction volume ~~as a result of the planned exit of an affinity program which had changed ownership. It also reflected the impact of the consolidation of~~processed on our ~~call centers as an efficiency and cost cutting measure.~~platforms. Printing and supplies ~~decreased $543,000~~increased $18,000, or ~~65.8%~~12.9%, to ~~$282,000~~$158,000 in the ~~third~~first quarter of ~~2017~~2020 from ~~$825,000~~$140,000 in the ~~third~~first quarter of ~~2016,~~2019. Audit expense decreased $66,000, or 14.1%, to $401,000 in the first quarter of 2020 from $467,000 in the first quarter of 2019, which reflected ~~elevated expense in 2016 due to service charge~~decreased regulatory and other communications in that year. Audit expense increased $147,000 or 59.8% to $393,000 in the third quarter of 2017 from $246,000 in the third quarter of 2016 which reflected increased regulatorytax compliance audit fees. Legal expense ~~increased $1.9 million~~decreased $411,000, or ~~237.1%~~31.0%, to ~~$2.7~~$913,000 in the first quarter of 2020 from $1.3 million in the ~~third~~first quarter of ~~2017 from $814,000 in the third quarter of 2016,~~2019, reflecting decreased costs associated with an SEC subpoena related to the restatement of the financial statements ~~(see “Financial Statements; Regulatory Actions”)~~ and other regulatory related legal fees. Amortization of intangible assets decreased ~~$17,000,~~$236,000, or ~~4.3%~~61.6%, to ~~$377,000~~$147,000 in the first quarter of 2020 from $383,000 in the first quarter of 2019. The reduction reflected the full amortization of our customer list intangible for the ~~third~~Stored Value Solutions purchase from Marshall Bankfirst in the first quarter of ~~2017 from $394,000 for the third quarter of 2016 reflecting amortization of an intangible resulting from the 2016 purchase of $60 million of lease receivables.~~2020. FDIC insurance expense ~~decreased $373,000~~increased $660,000, or ~~15.3%~~34.2%, to ~~$2.1~~$2.6 million for the ~~third~~first quarter of ~~2017~~2020 from ~~$2.4~~$1.9 million in the ~~third~~first quarter of ~~2016 reflecting a decrease~~2019 primarily due to an increase in average ~~deposits and a reduction in rate.~~liabilities, against which insurance rates are applied. Software expense increased ~~$56,000~~$556,000, or ~~1.8%~~19.0%, to ~~$3.1~~$3.5 million in the ~~third~~first quarter of ~~2017~~2020 from ~~$3.0~~$2.9 million in the ~~third~~first quarter of ~~2016 as a result of additional~~2019 reflecting increased expenditures for information technology infrastructure to improve efficiency and scalability, including BSA software required to satisfy regulatory requirements. Insurance expense increased ~~$2,000~~$29,000, or ~~0.3%~~4.9%, to ~~$633,000~~$623,000 in the ~~third~~first quarter ~~2017~~of 2020 compared to ~~$631,000~~$594,000 in the ~~third~~first quarter of ~~2016.~~2019. Telecom and IT network communications ~~decreased $156,000~~increased $67,000, or ~~26.8%~~20.6%, to ~~$426,000~~$392,000 in the ~~third~~first quarter of ~~2017~~2020 from ~~$582,000~~$325,000 in the ~~third~~first quarter of ~~2016. The decrease reflected cost cutting efforts which included the elimination of corporate sponsored cell phones.~~2019. Consulting decreased ~~$1.2 million~~$380,000, or ~~70.3%~~59.8%, to ~~$505,000~~$255,000 in the ~~third~~first quarter of ~~2017~~2020 from ~~$1.7 million~~$635,000 in the ~~third~~first quarter of ~~2016~~2019 reflecting ~~reduced regulatory related~~the use of consulting resources which now are reflected in salaries and benefits expense. Other non-interest expense ~~decreased $702,000~~increased $290,000, or ~~16.4%~~9.7%, to ~~$3.6~~$3.3 million in the ~~third~~first quarter of ~~2017~~2020 from ~~$4.3~~$3.0 million in the ~~third~~first quarter of ~~2016, which~~2019. The $290,000 increase reflected ~~decreases~~an increase of ~~$448,000 for travel and entertainment expenses and $384,000 of customer identification expense. The decrease~~$141,000 in ~~travel and entertainment expenses reflected the impact of staff reductions and other cost cutting measures. The decrease in customer~~contributions, including CRA contributions.

~~identification expense primarily reflected the exit of one affinity group and reduced health savings volume due to the sale of that business.~~

Income Taxes. Income tax expense for continuing operations was ~~$5.5~~$4.4 million for the ~~third~~first quarter of ~~2017~~2020 compared to ~~$55,000~~$6.0 million in the ~~third~~first quarter of ~~2016. The 45%~~2019. A 24.9% effective tax rate in ~~2016~~2020 and a 25.7% effective tax rate in 2019 primarily ~~was higher than the statutory rate of 34% and reflected the impact of taxes related to European operations which were being exited in 2017.~~

~~Net Income:~~ The improvement in net income in third quarter 2017 compared to third quarter 2017 reflected revenue growth, expense reductions, the conclusion of BSA lookback expense in 2016 and credit related charges in discontinued operations in 2016. ~~Net income from continuing operations for the first nine months of 2017~~ ~~was $30.7 million, or $0.55~~ ~~per diluted share, compared to net loss of $29.8 million, or $0.73 per diluted share for the first nine months of 2016. After discontinued operations, net income for the first nine months of 2017~~ ~~was $34.1 million~~ compared to net loss of $67.7 million for the first nine months of 2016. Net interest income increased $15.0 million to $80.0 million for the first nine months of 2017 compared to $65.0 million for the first nine months of 2016 primarily as a result of higher loan balances and yields which reflected the Federal Reserve’s rate increases. The provision for loan and lease losses increased $340,000 to $2.2 million in the first nine months of 2017 compared to $1.8 million in the first nine months of 2016. Non-interest income increased $24.8 million (excluding security gains and losses), from $45.0 million for the first nine months of 2016, to $69.8 million. The increase reflected a $12.3 million change in the value of investment in unconsolidated entity and $17.5 million of gain on sale of loans into securitizations in 2017. In 2017, a $2.5 million gain on the sale of our health savings accounts was more than offset by a loss of $3.4 million on the sale of our European prepaid operations. A $3.8 million decrease in other income, from $4.7 million in 2016 to $892,000 in 2017, resulted primarily from a second quarter 2016 gain on the sale of Visa Europe to Visa U.S.A., in which members of Visa Europe shared in the sales proceeds. Non-interest expense reflected a $29.1 million decrease in BSA lookback-related consulting expenses and an $8.3 million decrease in other non interest expenses, which reflected a $4.5 million decrease in salaries and employee benefits and a $2.9 million decrease in data processing expense. Diluted income per share ~~was $0.61 for the~~ ~~first nine months of 2017 compared to diluted loss per share of $1.65 for the first nine months of 2016.~~

~~Net Interest Income:~~ Our net interest income for the first nine months of 2017 increased to $80.0 million, an increase of $15.0 million, or 23.1%, from $65.0 million in the first nine months of 2016. Our interest income for the first nine months of 2017 increased to $91.2 million, an increase of $16.8 million, or 22.7%, from $74.3 million for the first nine months of 2016. The increase in interest income resulted primarily from higher balances of loans and higher yields. Our average loans and leases increased $197.8 million to $1.76 billion for the first nine months of 2017 from $1.56 billion for the first nine months of 2016, while related interest income increased $10.1 million on a21% federal tax equivalent basis. The increase in average loans reflected organic growth in leasing, SBA and SBLOC lending. Our average investment securities decreased to $1.28 billion for the first nine months of 2017 from $1.34 billion for the first nine months of 2016 while related interest income increased $3.6 million on a tax equivalent basis as a result of higher yields. Yields on both loans and investment securities increased as a result of the impact of the Federal Reserve’s rate increases on variable rate loans and securities. Deposit rates and resulting interest expense adjusted only partially to the Federal Reserve’s rate increases.

Our net interest margin (calculated by dividing net interest income by average interest earning assets) for the first nine months of 2017 increased to 3.02% from 2.57% in the first nine months of 2016, an increase of 45 basis points. The increase in the net interest margin reflected higher yields on loans and investment securities, reflecting the aforementioned Federal Reserve increases. In the first nine months of 2017, the average yield on our loans increased to 4.46% from 4.15% for the first nine months of 2016, an increase of 31 basis points. Yields on taxable investment securities were higher at 2.83% compared to 2.37% an increase of 46 basis points. The net interest margin also benefited from the reinvestment of maturities of investment securities into higher yielding loans. Average interest earning deposits at the Federal Reserve Bank increased $42.2 million, or 8.6% to $532.2 million in the first nine months of 2017 from $490.0 million in the first nine months of 2016. That difference reflects a minimal percentage of total deposits, and resulted primarily from daily fluctuations in deposits and loans. The interest cost of total deposits and interest bearing liabilities was relatively stable at 0.38% for the first nine months of 2017 compared to 0.32% in the first nine months of 2016. The cost of deposits increased significantly less than the increase in variable rates on loans and investments primarily due to contractual provisions related to prepaid card deposits. Those contracts result in only partial adjustment to Federal Reserve rate increases.

~~Average Daily Balances.~~ The following table presents the average daily balances of assets, liabilities and stockholders’ equity and the respective interest earned or paid on interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities, as well as average annualized rates, for the periods indicated:

Nine months ended September 30,

2017

2016

Average

Average

Average

Average

Balance

Interest

Rate

Balance

Interest

Rate

(dollars in thousands)
Assets:

Interest earning assets:

Loans net of unearned fees and costs **

$                 1,740,655

$             58,266

4.46%

$                 1,543,448

$             48,061

4.15%
Leases - bank qualified*

21,167

1,231

7.75%

20,618

1,334

8.63%
Investment securities-taxable

1,269,922

26,990

2.83%

1,280,692

22,782

2.37%
Investment securities-nontaxable*

14,423

351

3.24%

59,892

983

2.19%
Interest earning deposits at Federal Reserve Bank

532,223

3,961

0.99%

490,037

1,677

0.46%
Federal funds sold  and securities purchased under agreement to resell

60,119

931

2.06%

27,414

301

1.46%
Net interest earning assets

3,638,509

91,730

3.36%

3,422,101

75,138

2.93%

Allowance for loan and lease losses

(6,793)

(4,538)

Assets held for sale from discontinued operations

337,102

9,594

3.79%

528,168

15,037

3.80%
Other assets

251,629

283,171

$                 4,220,447

$                 4,228,902

Liabilities and shareholders' equity:

Deposits:

Demand and interest checking

$                 3,433,027

$               8,836

0.34%

$                 3,325,047

$               7,217

0.29%
Savings and money market

434,768

1,718

0.53%

390,202

1,028

0.35%
Time

-

-

0.00%

103,624

447

0.58%
Total deposits

3,867,795

10,554

0.36%

3,818,873

8,692

0.30%

Short-term borrowings

19,498

197

1.35%

58,056

263

0.60%
Repurchase agreements

245

-

0.00%

812

1

0.16%
Subordinated debt

13,401

432

4.30%

13,401

383

3.81%
Total deposits and interest bearing liabilities

3,900,939

11,183

0.38%

3,891,142

9,339

0.32%

Other liabilities

431

21,306

Total liabilities

3,901,370

3,912,448

Shareholders' equity

319,077

316,454

$                 4,220,447

$                 4,228,902

Net interest income on tax equivalent basis *

$             90,141

$             80,836

Tax equivalent adjustment

554

811

Net interest income

$             89,587

$             80,025

Net interest margin *

3.02%

2.57%

* Full taxable equivalent basis, using a 35% statutory tax rate.

** Includes loans held for sale.

~~For the first nine months of 2017, average interest earning assets increased to $3.64 billion, an increase of $216.4 million, or 6.3%~~from $3.42 billion in the first nine months of 2016. The increase reflected increased average balances of loans and leases of $197.8 million, or 12.6%, and increased average balances of interest earning deposits at the Federal Reserve Bank of $42.2 million, or 8.6%. Average securities decreased $56.2 million or 4.2% as lower yielding securities were replaced with higher yielding loans. Average demand and interest checking deposits increased $108.0 million, or 3.2% due primarily to growth in payments related deposits.

~~Provision for Loan and Lease Losses~~. Our provision for loan and lease losses increased $340,000, to $2.2 million for the first nine months of 2017 compared to $1.8 million for the first nine months of 2016. The increase in the provision is based on our evaluation of

the adequacy of our allowance for loan and leases losses, particularly in light of current economic conditions. At September 30, 2017, our allowance for loan and lease losses amounted to $7.3 million, or 0.53% of total loans compared to $6.3 million, or 0.52% of total loans at December 31, 2016. For more information about our provision and allowance for loan and lease losses and our loss experience, see “Financial Condition-Allowance for loan and lease losses”, “-Net charge-offs,” and “-Non-performing loans, loans 90 days delinquent and still accruing, and troubled debt restructurings,” below and Note 6 to the financial statements.

~~Non-Interest Income~~. Non-interest income was $69.8 million in the first nine months of 2017 compared to $45.0 million in the first nine months of 2016, before gains on securities of $1.6 million in the first nine months of 2017 and $3.1 million in the first nine months of 2016. The $24.8 million, or 55.1%, increase between those respective periods reflected a $12.3 million change in value of investment in unconsolidated entity. It also reflected a $16.7 million increase in gain on sale of loans into securitizations resulting primarily from two securitizations in 2017. In the second quarter of 2017 we had a $2.5 million gain on the sale of a portion of our health savings portfolio which was more than offset by a $3.4 million loss on the sale of our European prepaid card operations. Gain on sale of loans increased to $17.5 million for the first nine months of 2017 from $809,000 in the first nine months of 2016 primarily as a result of gain on sale of loans into two securitizations. Service fees on deposit accounts increased $1.6 million, or 46.8%, to $4.9 million for the first nine months of 2017 from $3.3 million for the first nine months of 2016 reflecting increases in service charges on safe harbor individual retirement accounts. Prepaid card fees decreased $61,000, or 0.2% to $39.3 million for the first nine months of 2017 from $39.3 million for the first nine months of 2016 which reflected decreased volumes from a client as a result of its change in ownership and several programs whose sponsors decided to exit prepaid cards. Those volume decreases were largely offset with organic growth in other programs. Leasing income increased $632,000 or 43.4% to $2.1 million for the first nine months of 2017 from $1.5 million for the first nine months of 2016, which reflected higher gains on disposition of leased vehicles in 2017. Affinity fees decreased $2.1 million, or 58.8%, to $1.4 million for the first nine months of 2017 from $3.5 million for the first nine months of 2016. The decrease resulted primarily from the planned exit of one affinity relationship which had a change of ownership. Other non-interest income decreased $3.8 million, or 81.0% to $892,000 for the first nine months of 2017 from $4.7 million in the first nine months of 2016. The decrease resulted primarily from a gain on the sale of Visa Europe to Visa U.S.A., in which members of Visa Europe shared in the sales proceeds, which occurred in the second quarter of 2016.

~~Non-Interest Expense~~. Total non-interest expense was $119.0 million for the first nine months of 2017, a decrease of $37.4 million, or 23.9% from $156.4 million for the first nine months of 2016. The decrease reflected a decrease of $29.1 million in Bank Secrecy Act lookback expense which concluded in the third quarter of 2016. Salaries and employee benefits expense also decreased to $57.9 million, a decrease of $4.5 million, or 7.2% from $62.4 million for the first nine months of 2016. The decrease in salaries and employee benefits reflected bankwide staff reductions in the third quarter of 2016 which reduced total staff by approximately 20%. Depreciation and amortization decreased $346,000, or 9.2%, to $3.4 million in the first nine months of 2017 from $3.8 million in the first nine months of 2016 which reflected reduced spending on fixed assets and equipment. Rent and occupancy decreased $570,000 or 11.9% to $4.2 million in the first nine months of 2017 from $4.8 million in the first nine months of 2016. ~~The decrease reflected a reduction in leased space and more efficient use of office space.~~ Data processing expense decreased $2.9 million, or 26.5%, to $8.0 million in the first nine months of 2017 from $10.9 million in the first nine months of 2016. The decrease reflected the impact of a renegotiated data processing contract and lower account and transaction volume as a result of the planned exit of an affinity program which had an ownership change. It also reflected the impact of the consolidation of our call centers as an efficiency and cost cutting measure. Printing and supplies decreased $1.1 million or 49.0% to $1.1 million in the first nine months of 2017 from $2.2 million in the first nine months of 2016, which reflected elevated expense in 2016 due to service charge and other communications in that year. Audit expense increased $524,000 or 70.2% to $1.3 million in the first nine months of 2017 from $746,000 in the first nine months of 2016 which reflected increased regulatory compliance audit fees. Legal expense increased $2.1 million, or 56.1%, to $5.9 million for the first nine months of 2017 from $3.8 million in the first nine months of 2016 which reflected costs associated with an SEC subpoena related to the restatement of the financial statements (see “Financial Statements; Regulatory Actions”) and other regulatory related legal fees. The year to date increase was net of insurance coverage. Amortization of intangible assets increased $101,000, or 9.8%, to $1.1 million for the first nine months of 2017 from $1.0 million for the first nine months of 2016. The increase resulted primarily from the amortization of the intangible asset resulting from the 2016 purchase of the $60 million of lease receivables. FDIC insurance expense increased $468,000, or 6.6% to $7.6 million for the first nine months of 2017 from $7.1 million in the first nine months of 2016, which reflected the impact of an increase in the FDIC assessment rate. Software expense increased $1.1 million, or 12.8% to $9.3 million in the first nine months of 2017 from $8.3 million in the first nine months of 2016 which reflected additional information technology infrastructure to improve efficiency and scalability, including BSA software required to satisfy regulatory requirements. Insurance expense increased $158,000, or 9.3%, to $1.9 million in the first nine months of 2017 from $1.7 million in the first nine months of 2016. The increase reflected higher cyber and director and officer coverages. Telecom and IT network communications expense decreased $104,000 or 6.7% to $1.4 million in the first nine months of 2017 from $1.5 million in the first nine months of 2016. The decrease reflected cost cutting efforts which included the elimination of corporate sponsored cell phones. Securitization and servicing expense decreased $647,000 or 86.6%, to $100,000 in the first nine months of 2017 from $747,000 in the first nine months of 2016. Expense in 2016 reflected expenditures related to a potential securitization for loans which were instead sold directly to a single buyer. Consulting expense decreased $2.5 million, or 58.6% to $1.7 million in the first nine months of 2017 from $4.2 million in the first nine months of 2016. The decrease reflected reduced regulatory related and investor relations consulting. Other non-interest expense decreased $3.8 million, or 27.0% to $10.3 million in the first nine months of 2017 from $14.1 million in the first nine months of 2016. The $3.8 million decrease reflected decreases of $1.8 million in travel and entertainment expenses, $815,000 in customer identification expense, $512,000 in

postage expense, $299,000 in expense related to third party origination of SBA loans and $190,000 in other leasing expense. The decrease in customer identification expense primarily reflected the exit of one affinity group and reduced health savings volume due to the sale of that business. The decrease in postage expense reflected the impact of the sale of the health savings business and also reflected elevated expense in 2016 due to service charge and other communications mailings in that year. The decrease in travel and entertainment expense reflected the impact of staff reductions and a concerted effort to reduce travel and related expenses.

~~Income Taxes.~~ Income tax benefit for continuing operations was $457,000 for the first nine months of 2017 compared to $15.3 million in the first nine months of 2016. The tax benefit in 2017 reflected the impact of approximately $12 million of deferred tax valuation allowance reversals. That tax benefit was largely offset by the application of statutory federal and state tax rates against $30.2 million of pre tax income. The 35% effective tax benefit rate in 2016 reflected the statutory 34% rate and the impact of various state income taxes.

Liquidity defines our ability to generate funds to support asset growth, meet deposit withdrawals, satisfy borrowing needs and otherwise operate on an ongoing basis. We invest the funds we do not need for daily operations primarily in overnight federal funds or in our interest-bearing account at the Federal Reserve.

Our primary source of funding has been deposits. We have been exiting deposit relationships to reduce excess balances at the Federal Reserve which earn relatively low rates of interest. While such exits continued in the third quarter of 2017, they were offset by growth in prepaid card and other payments deposits. Accordingly, overnightInterest-bearing balances at the Federal Reserve Bank, maintained on an overnight basis, averaged ~~$366.7~~$493.9 million for the ~~third~~first quarter of ~~2017, which was higher than~~2020, compared to the prior year ~~third~~first quarter average of ~~$324.2~~$423.0 million. Average deposits over those respective periods increased by $1.02 billion, or 26.5%, to $4.85 billion. The increase resulted primarily from a $554.9 million increase in non interest-bearing prepaid and debit card accounts, for which interest expense reflects amounts paid to third parties. A $142.2 million increase in savings and money market average balances reflected growth in interest-bearing prepaid and debit card account relationships for which account holders receive interest. Time deposits were utilized to fund loan growth, including CRE loan originations for sale into securitizations, and their average balances increased $319.5 million. Overnight borrowings comprised a minor component of average funding balances.

Investment securities available-for-sale ~~also~~ provide a ~~significant~~primary source of balance sheet liquidity. In excess of $750 million of our investments are issued by U.S. government agencies and are accordingly highly liquid, and may be pledged as collateral for our FHLB line of credit. Loan repayments, also a source of funds, were exceeded by new loan disbursements during the first ~~nine~~three months of ~~2017.~~ 2020. As a result, loans outstanding at March 31, 2020 totaled $1.99 billion, compared to $1.82 billion at December 31, 2019, an increase of $161.5 million. Over that period, commercial loans held-for-sale increased $535.9 million to $1.72 billion. In 2019 and previous years, we have sold loans into securitizations semi-annually. A planned sale for April 2020 did not occur. See “Recent Developments”. Such sales have created an additional source of liquidity.

While we do not have a traditional branch system, we believe that our core deposits, which include our demand, interest checking, savings and money market accounts, have similar characteristics to those of a bank with a branch system. ~~We believe that the rate on our deposits is at or below competitors’ rates. However, the focus~~The majority of our deposit accounts are obtained with the assistance of third parties and as a result are classified as brokered by the FDIC. The FDIC guidance for classification of deposit accounts as brokered is relatively broad, and generally includes accounts which were referred to or “placed” with the institution by other companies. If the Bank ceases to be categorized as “well capitalized” under banking regulations, it will be prohibited from accepting, renewing or rolling over brokered deposits without the consent of the FDIC. In such a case, the FDIC’s refusal to grant consent to our accepting, renewing or rolling over brokered deposits could effectively restrict or eliminate the ability of the Bank to operate its business ~~model is~~lines as presently conducted.

We focus on customer service which we believe has resulted in a history of customer loyalty. Stability, lower cost and customer loyalty comprise key characteristics of core deposits which we believe are comparable to ~~identify affinity groups that control significant~~core deposits ~~as part~~ of their business. A key component to the model is that the affinity group deposits are both stable and “sticky,” in the sense that they do not react to fluctuations in the market. Nonetheless, certainpeers with branch systems. Certain components of ~~the~~our deposits do experience seasonality, creating greater excess liquidity at certain ~~times during the year, especially~~times. The largest deposit inflows occur in the first quarter ~~as a result~~ of the year when certain of our accounts are credited with tax refund ~~prepaid card balances.~~payments from the U.S. Treasury.

~~Historically, we have also used sources outside of our deposit products to fund our loan growth,~~While consumer transaction accounts including ~~Federal Home Loan Bank advances, repurchase agreements, and institutional (brokered) certificates of deposit. In the first nine months of 2017,~~prepaid accounts comprise the vast majority of our funding was derived from prepaid cards and transaction accounts. While the FDIC now classifies prepaid and most of our other deposits obtained with the cooperation of third parties as brokered, these deposits have demonstrated stability and low cost for an extended historical period. Weneeds, we maintain secured borrowing lines with the ~~Federal Home Loan Bank of Pittsburgh, or~~ FHLB and the Federal ~~Reserve Bank.~~Reserve. As of ~~September 30, 2017,~~March 31, 2020, we had ~~approximately $573.7 million available on~~ a ~~line of credit with the Federal Home Loan Bank and $179.8 million available on a~~$1.12 billion line of credit with the Federal Reserve, ~~Bank. These lines~~which may be collateralized by ~~specified~~various types of loans orand securities, but which we generally have not used. However, in light of the impact of the Coronavirus, the Federal Reserve has encouraged banks to utilize their lines to maximize the amount of funding available for credit markets. Accordingly, the Bank has been borrowing on its line on an overnight basis. The amount of loans pledged varies and the collateral may be unpledged at any time to the extent the collateral exceeds advances. We may access our line of credit with the FHLB after pledging U.S. government agency securities, which is permitted at any time, to allow daily access to the line. As of March 31, 2020, we had eligible securities which would result in approximately $750 million of availability. As of March 31, 2020, we had $140.0 million outstanding on the Federal Reserve line and $0 outstanding on our FHLB line. We expect to continue to maintain ~~these facilities.~~our facilities with the FHLB and Federal Reserve. We actively monitor our positions and contingent funding sources ~~on a daily basis. As of September 30, 2017, we did not have any borrowings outstanding on our lines of credit.~~daily.

As a holding company conducting substantially all of our business through our subsidiaries, our need for liquidity consists principally of cash needed to make required interest payments on our trust preferred securities. As of ~~September 30, 2017,~~March 31, 2020, we had cash reserves of approximately ~~$13.0~~$13.6 million at the holding company. Current quarterly interest payments on the $13.4 million of trust preferred securities are approximately ~~$150,000~~$170,000 based on a floating rate of 3.25% over LIBOR. We expect that when the conditions under which the amendment to the 2014 Consent Order was issued ~~will have been~~are remediated, the FDIC and Federal Reserve will permit the Bank to resume paying dividends to us to fund holding company operations. There can, however, be no assurance that the FDIC will, in fact, allow the resumption of Bank dividends to us ~~at the end of that period or at all~~ and, accordingly, there is risk that we will need to obtain alternate sources of funding. There can be no assurance that such sources would be available to us on acceptable terms or at all. A Supervisory Letter from the Federal Reserve, requiring its approval for any dividend from us, was lifted in 2019.

Included in our cash and cash-equivalents at ~~September 30, 2017~~March 31, 2020 were ~~$328.0~~$106.0 million of interest earning deposits which primarily consisted of deposits with the Federal ~~Reserve and included deposits for reserve requirements.~~ Reserve.

Net redemptions of investment securities for the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September 30, 2017,~~March 31, 2020 were ~~$87.2~~$49.5 million compared to net purchases of ~~$251.1~~$21.3 million for the prior ~~year.~~year period. We had outstanding commitments to fund loans, including unused lines of credit, of ~~$1.31~~$2.22 billion and ~~$1.09~~$2.34 billion as of ~~September 30, 2017~~March 31, 2020 and December 31, ~~2016,~~2019, respectively. The majority of our commitments are variable rate and originate with security backed lines of credit. Such commitments are normally based on the full amount of collateral in a ~~customers~~customer’s investment account. However, such commitments have historically been drawn at only a fraction of the total commitment. The funding requirements for such commitments occur on a measured basis over time and would be funded by normal deposit growth.

We must comply with capital adequacy guidelines issued by the FDIC. A bank must, in general, have a Tier 1 leverage ratio of 5.00%, a ratio of Tier I capital to risk-weighted assets of 8.0%, a ratio of total capital to risk-weighted assets of 10.0% and a ratio of common equity tier 1 to risk weighted assets of 6.5% to be considered “well capitalized.” The Tier I leverage ratio is the ratio of Tier 1 capital to average assets for the period. “Tier I capital” includes common shareholders’ equity, certain qualifying perpetual preferred stock and minority interests in equity accounts of consolidated subsidiaries, less intangibles. At ~~September 30, 2017,~~March 31, 2020, we were “well capitalized” under banking regulations.

The following table sets forth our regulatory capital amounts and ratios for the periods indicated:



	Tier 1 capital	Tier 1 capital	Total capital	Common equity	Tier 1 capital	Tier 1 capital	Total capital	Common equity
	to average	to risk-weighted	to risk-weighted	tier 1 to risk	to average	to risk-weighted	to risk-weighted	tier 1 to risk
	assets ratio	assets ratio	assets ratio	weighted assets	assets ratio	assets ratio	assets ratio	weighted assets

As of September 30, 2017
As of March 31, 2020
The Bancorp, Inc.	8.24%	16.27%	16.62%	16.27%	8.90%	16.99%	17.50%	16.99%
The Bancorp Bank	8.05%	15.95%	16.31%	15.95%	8.76%	16.70%	17.22%	16.70%
"Well capitalized" institution (under FDIC regulations-Basel III)	5.00%	8.00%	10.00%	6.50%	5.00%	8.00%	10.00%	6.50%

As of December 31, 2016
As of December 31, 2019
The Bancorp, Inc.	6.90%	13.34%	13.63%	13.34%	9.63%	19.04%	19.45%	19.04%
The Bancorp Bank	6.84%	13.24%	13.53%	13.24%	9.46%	18.71%	19.11%	18.71%
"Well capitalized" institution (under FDIC regulations)	5.00%	8.00%	10.00%	6.50%
"Well capitalized" institution (under FDIC regulations-Basel III)					5.00%	8.00%	10.00%	6.50%

The management of rate sensitive assets and liabilities is essential to controlling interest rate risk and optimizing interest margins. An interest rate sensitive asset or liability is one that, within a defined time period, either matures or experiences an interest rate change in line with general market rates. Interest rate sensitivity measures the relative volatility of an institution’s interest margin resulting from changes in market interest rates.

We monitor, manage and control interest rate risk through a variety of techniques, including use of traditional interest rate sensitivity analysis (also known as “gap analysis”) and an interest rate risk management model. With the interest rate risk management model, we project future net interest income and then estimate the effect of various changes in interest rates and balance sheet growth rates on that projected net interest income. We also use the interest rate risk management model to calculate the change in net portfolio value over a range of interest rate change scenarios. Traditional gap analysis involves arranging our interest earning assets and interest bearing liabilities by repricing periods and then computing the difference (or “interest rate sensitivity gap”) between the assets and liabilities that we estimate will reprice during each time period and cumulatively through the end of each time period.

Both interest rate sensitivity modeling and gap analysis are done at a specific point in time and involve a variety of significant estimates and assumptions. Interest rate sensitivity modeling requires, among other things, estimates of how much and when yields and costs on individual categories of interest earning assets and interest bearing liabilities will respond to general changes in market rates, future cash flows and discount rates. Gap analysis requires estimates as to when individual categories of interest-sensitive assets and liabilities will reprice, and assumes that assets and liabilities assigned to the same repricing period will reprice at the same time and in the same amount. Gap analysis does not account for the fact that repricing of assets and liabilities is discretionary and subject to competitive and other pressures. A gap is considered positive when the amount of interest rate sensitive assets exceeds the amount of interest rate sensitive liabilities. A gap is considered negative when the amount of interest rate sensitive liabilities exceeds interest rate sensitive assets. During a period of falling interest rates, a positive gap would tend to adversely affect net interest income, while a negative gap would tend to result in an increase in net interest income. During a period of rising interest rates, a positive gap would tend to result in an increase in net interest income while a negative gap would tend to affect net interest income adversely.

The following table sets forth the estimated maturity or repricing structure of our interest earning assets and interest bearing liabilities at ~~September 30, 2017.~~March 31, 2020. Except as stated below, the amounts of assets or liabilities shown which reprice or mature during a particular period were determined in accordance with the contractual terms of each asset or liability. The majority of demand and interest bearing demand

deposits and savings deposits are assumed to be “core” deposits, or deposits that will generally remain with us regardless of market interest rates. We estimate the repricing characteristics of these deposits based on historical performance, past experience, ~~at other institutions~~judgmental predictions and other deposit behavior assumptions. However, we may choose not to reprice liabilities proportionally to changes in market interest rates for competitive or other reasons. Additionally, although non-interest bearing demand accounts are not paid interest, we estimate certain of the balances will reprice as a result of the contractual fees that are paid to the affinity groups which are based upon a rate index, and therefore are included in interest expense. We have adjusted the demand and interest checking balances in the table downward, to better reflect the impact of their partial adjustment to changes in rates. Loan and security balances, which adjust more fully to market rate changes, are based upon actual balances. The vast majority of loans at their interest rate floors are included in commercial loans held for sale and totaled approximately $1.37 billion at March 31, 2020. However, these loans are held for sale and, depending on whether and when they are sold, would significantly impact the gap analysis and rate sensitivity. The table does not assume any prepayment of fixed-rate loans and mortgage-backed securities ~~which~~ are scheduled based on their anticipated cash flow, including prepayments based on historical data and current market trends. The table does not necessarily indicate the impact of general interest rate movements on our net interest income because the repricing and related behavior of certain categories of assets and liabilities is beyond our control as, for example, prepayments of loans and withdrawal

of deposits. As a result, certain assets and liabilities indicated as repricing within a stated period may, in fact, reprice at different times and at different rate levels.



	1-90	91-364	1-3	3-5	Over 5	1-90	91-364	1-3	3-5	Over 5
	Days	Days	Years	Years	Years	Days	Days	Years	Years	Years
	(dollars in thousands)					(dollars in thousands)
Interest earning assets:
Commercial loans held for sale	$ 169,953	$ 19,356	$ 50,267	$ 21,181	$ 119,515
Commercial loans held-for-sale						$ 1,560,283	$ 24,407	$ 39,071	$ 6,915	$ 85,774
Loans net of deferred loan costs	905,299	124,564	150,922	183,104	10,171	1,417,011	81,231	263,928	206,995	16,590
Investment securities	357,407	153,315	181,936	199,881	390,819	564,429	100,091	204,473	264,582	219,703
Interest earning deposits	328,023	-	-	-	-	105,978	-	-	-	-
Securities purchased under agreements to resell	65,095	-	-	-	-
Total interest earning assets	1,825,777	297,235	383,125	404,166	520,505	3,647,701	205,729	507,472	478,492	322,067

Interest bearing liabilities:
Demand and interest checking	2,012,233	66,386	66,386	-	-	2,912,802	102,725	102,725	-	-
Savings and money market	113,046	226,091	113,046	-	-	44,543	89,088	44,543	-	-
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase	180	-	-	-	-	42	-	-	-	-
Subordinated debenture	13,401	-	-	-	-
Short-term borrowings						140,000	-	-	-	-
Subordinated debentures						13,401	-	-	-	-
Total interest bearing liabilities	2,138,860	292,477	179,432	-	-	3,110,788	191,813	147,268	-	-
Gap	$ (313,083)	$ 4,758	$ 203,693	$ 404,166	$ 520,505	$ 536,913	$ 13,916	$ 360,204	$ 478,492	$ 322,067
Cumulative gap	$ (313,083)	$ (308,325)	$ (104,632)	$ 299,534	$ 820,039	$ 536,913	$ 550,829	$ 911,033	$ 1,389,525	$ 1,711,592
Gap to assets ratio	-8%	*	5%	10%	13%	10%	*	7%	9%	6%
Cumulative gap to assets ratio	-8%	-8%	-3%	8%	21%	10%	10%	17%	25%	31%

* While demand deposits are non-interest bearing, related fees paid to affinity groups may reprice according to specified indices.

The methods used to analyze interest rate sensitivity in this table have a number of limitations. Certain assets and liabilities may react differently to changes in interest rates even though they reprice or mature in the same or similar time periods. The interest rates on certain assets and liabilities may change at different times than ~~changes in~~ market interest rates, with some changing in advance of changes in market rates and some lagging behind changes in market rates. Additionally, the actual prepayments and withdrawals we experience when interest rates change may deviate significantly from those assumed in calculating the data shown in the table. Accordingly, actual results can and often do differ from projections.

General. Our total assets at ~~September 30, 2017~~March 31, 2020 were ~~$3.99~~$5.46 billion, of which our total loans were ~~$1.37~~$1.99 billion and our commercial loans held-for-sale were $1.72 billion. At December 31, ~~2016,~~2019, our total assets were ~~$4.86~~$5.66 billion, of which our total loans were ~~$1.22~~$1.82 billion and our commercial loans held-for-sale were $1.18 billion. The decrease in assets reflected the ~~exit~~maturity of $475.0 million of certificates of deposit with terms less ~~profitable deposit relationships.~~than ninety days.

Interest earning deposits and federal funds sold. At ~~September 30, 2017,~~March 31, 2020, we had a total of ~~$328.0~~$106.0 million of interest earning deposits compared to ~~$955.7~~$924.5 million at December 31, ~~2016,~~2019, a decrease of ~~$627.7~~$818.6 million, or ~~65.7%~~88.5%. These deposits were comprised primarily of balances at the Federal Reserve, which pays interest on such balances. ~~Reductions in such balances~~The decrease reflected ~~deployment~~the maturity of ~~such funds into higher yielding loans~~the $475 million of certificates of deposit noted above and ~~securities and the exit of less profitable deposit relationships.~~loan growth.

Investment portfolio. For detailed information on the composition and maturity distribution of our investment portfolio, see Note 5 to the Financial Statements. Total investment securities decreased to ~~$1.28~~$1.35 billion at ~~September 30, 2017,~~March 31, 2020, a decrease of ~~$58.7~~$51.8 million, or ~~4.4%~~3.7%, from ~~year-end 2016.~~December 31, 2019. The decrease ~~in investment~~reflected prepayments on mortgage backed securities. In March 2020, the Company transferred the four securities ~~was primarily~~comprising its held-to-maturity securities portfolio to available-for-sale. The interest rates for these securities utilize LIBOR as a benchmark and were permitted to be transferred by a provision of ASU 2020-04, to maximize management and accounting flexibility as a result of ~~prepayments on collateralized loan obligation securities. Other~~the future phase-out of LIBOR.

The four securities ~~included in the held-to-maturity classification at September 30, 2017, consisted~~transferred to available-for-sale had book and fair values as of March 31, 2020 as follows: a trust preferred unrated security issued by an insurance company with a book value of $10.0 million and a fair value of $5.2 million; and three securities ~~secured~~supported by diversified portfolios of corporate securities with a book value of $75.1 million and ~~two single-issuer trust preferred securities.~~a fair value of $75.6 million.

A total of $11.0 million of other debt securities - single issuers is comprised of the following: amortized cost of two single-issuer trust preferred securities of $11.0 million, of which one security for $1.9 million was issued by a bank and one security for $9.1 million was issued by an insurance company.

~~A total of $75.4 million of other debt securities – pooled is comprised of three securities consisting of diversified portfolios of corporate securities.~~

~~The following table provides additional information related to our single issuer trust preferred securities as of September 30, 2017 (in thousands):~~

Under the accounting guidance related to ~~the recognition~~CECL, changes in fair value of ~~other-than-temporary impairment charges on debt~~ securities ~~an impairment on a debt security is deemed~~unrelated to credit losses continue to be ~~other-than-temporary if it meets~~recognized through capital. However, credit related losses are recognized through an allowance, rather than through a reduction in the ~~following conditions: (i) we intend to sell or it is more likely than not we will be required to sell the security before a recovery in value, or (ii) we do not expect to recover the entire~~ amortized cost ~~basis~~ of the security. ~~If we intend to sell or it is more likely than~~The guidance for the new CECL allowance includes a provision for the reversal of credit impairments in future periods based on improvements in credit, which was not ~~we will be required to sell the security before a recovery~~included in value, a charge is recorded in net realized capital losses equal to the difference between the fair value and amortized cost basis of the security. For those other-than-temporarily impaired debt securities which do not meet the first condition and for which we do not expect to recover the entire amortized cost basis, the difference between the security’s amortized cost basis and the fair value is separated into the portion representing a credit impairment, which is recorded in net realized capital losses, and the remaining impairment, which is recorded in other comprehensive income.previous guidance. Generally, a security’s credit ~~impairment~~related loss is the difference between its amortized cost basis and the best estimate of its expected future cash flows discounted at the security’s effective ~~yield~~yield. That difference is recognized through the income statement, as with prior ~~to impairment. The previous amortized cost basis less the impairment recognized in net realized capital losses becomes the security’s new cost basis.~~guidance, but is renamed a provision for credit loss. For the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September 30, 2017~~March 31, 2020 and ~~September 30, 2016,~~2019, we recognized no ~~other-than-temporary impairment charges~~credit related ~~to trust preferred securities classified in~~losses on our ~~held-to-maturity~~ portfolio.

Investments in Federal Home Loan and Atlantic Central Bankers Bank stock are recorded at cost and amounted to ~~$991,000~~$1.1 million at ~~September 30, 2017,~~March 31, 2020, compared to ~~$1.6~~$5.3 million at December 31, ~~2016. The decrease resulted from a decrease in the amount of~~2019. Federal Home Loan Bank stock ~~that entity periodically requests be adjusted~~purchases are required in order to ~~its level of services.~~

~~Investment securities with a carrying value of $606.8 million at September 30, 2017 and $607.2 million at December 31, 2016, were pledged as collateral for~~borrow from the Federal Home Loan Bank. The decline in stock holdings at March 31, 2020 resulted from a reduction in borrowings from the FHLB during the quarter. Both the FHLB and Atlantic Central Bankers Bank ~~advances~~require its correspondent banking institutions to hold stock as a condition of membership.

At March 31, 2020 and ~~letters~~December 31, 2019 no investment securities were encumbered through pledging.

As of ~~credit as required~~March 31, 2020 the principal balance of the security owned from CRE-1 was $10.1 million. Repayment is expected from the workout or ~~permitted by law.~~disposition of commercial real estate collateral, all proceeds of which will first repay our $10.1 million balance. The vast majority of the collateral consists of a hotel in a high-density populated area in a northeastern major metropolitan area. The hotel was valued at over $40 million, based upon a 2016 appraisal.

~~Loans held for sale~~Commercial loans held-for-sale. ~~Loans held for sale~~Commercial loans held-for-sale are comprised of commercial ~~mortgage~~real estate loans and SBA loans originated for sale or securitization in the secondary market. The fair value of commercial ~~mortgage~~real estate loans and the SBA loans originated for sale is based on purchase commitments, quoted prices for the same or similar loans or fair market valuations based on other market ~~information.~~information on a pooled basis. Commercial loans ~~held for sale decreased~~held-for-sale increased to ~~$380.3 million~~$1.72 billion at ~~September 30, 2017~~March 31, 2020 from ~~$663.1 million~~$1.18 billion at December 31, ~~2016.~~2019. The decrease reflected a difference in the timing of loan originations and related sales. The December balance had accumulated until its recording as a sale in first quarter 2017 while the lower September balance reflected the impact of a sale in third quarter 2017.increase resulted primarily from commercial real estate originations.

Loan portfolio. Total loans increased to ~~$1.37~~$1.99 billion at ~~September 30, 2017~~March 31, 2020 from ~~$1.22~~$1.82 billion at December 31, ~~2016.~~2019.

The following table summarizes our loan portfolio, ~~not including~~excluding loans ~~held for sale,~~held-for-sale, by loan category for the periods indicated (in thousands):

*The ~~following~~preceding table shows ~~SBA~~small business loans (SBL) and ~~SBA loans held for sale~~SBL held-for-sale at the dates indicated (in thousands). While the majority of SBL are comprised of SBA loans, SBL also includes $20,923,000 of non-SBA loans as of March 31, 2020 and $4,738,000 as of December 31, 2019.

** Securities Backed Lines of Credit (SBLOC) are collateralized by marketable securities, while Insurance Backed Lines of Credit (IBLOC) are collateralized by the cash surrender value of insurance policies. At March 31, 2020, and December 31, 2019, respectively, IBLOC loans amounted to $228.8 million and $144.6 million.

*** Included in the table above under other consumer loans are demand deposit overdrafts reclassified as loan balances totaling $455,000 and $882,000 at March 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019, respectively. Estimated overdraft charge-offs and recoveries are reflected in the allowance for credit losses.

The following table summarizes our small business loan portfolio, including loans held-for-sale, by loan category as of March 31, 2020 (in thousands):

Additionally, the CARES Act of 2020, recently approved by Congress has provided significant support for SBA loans including funding intended to provide six months of interest payments on SBA loans, as well as other accommodations to provide for the payment of payroll and other operating expenses.

The following table summarizes our small business loan portfolio, excluding the government guaranteed portion of SBA 7a loans, by loan type as of March 31, 2020 (in thousands):

The following table summarizes our small business loan portfolio, excluding the government guaranteed portion of SBA 7a loans, by state as of March 31, 2020 (in thousands):

The following table summarizes the 10 largest loans in our small business loan portfolio, including loans held-for-sale, as of March 31, 2020 (in thousands):

* All of the top 10 loans are SBA and with the rest of the commercial real estate portfolio are originated with an approximate loan to value ratio between 50% and 60% at origination.

Commercial real estate loans held for sale which were originated for sale or securitization, excluding SBA loans, are as follows including LTV at origination as of March 31, 2020 (dollars in thousands):

* Of the total $4.1 million fair value adjustment, $1.8 million was related to hospitality loans.

The following table summarizes our commercial real estate loans held for sale which were originated for sale or securitization, excluding SBA loans, by state as of March 31, 2020 (in thousands):

The following table summarizes our 15 largest commercial real estate loans held for sale which were originated for sale or securitization, excluding SBA loans as of March 31, 2020 (in thousands). All of these loans are multi-family loans.

The following table summarizes our institutional banking portfolio by type as of March 31, 2020 (in thousands):

For SBLOC, we generally lend up to 50% of the value of equities and 80% for investment grade securities. While equities have fallen in excess of 30% in recent periods, the reduction in collateral value of brokerage accounts collateralizing SBLOCs generally has been less, for two reasons. First, many collateral accounts are “balanced” and accordingly, have a component of debt securities, which have either not decreased in value as much as equities, or in some cases may have increased in value. Secondly, many of these accounts have the benefit of professional investment advisors who provided some protection against market downturns, through diversification and other means. Additionally, borrowers often utilize only a portion of collateral value, which lowers the percentage of principal to the market value of collateral. As a result, the accounts monitored by management and related information as of March 31, 2020 were as follows (dollars in thousands):

* Of the 4,649 SBLOC loans with principal balances of $927.6 million, 151 loans at March 31, 2020 are being monitored, as they had exceeded the desired threshold for the percent of principal to market value of collateral. The first column reflects the percentage increase in that ratio before additional collateral or paydown of debt would be required. As of April 23, 2020, the number of loans requiring monitoring had decreased to 80 loans, with principal balances of $57 million.

The following table summarizes our top 10 SBLOC loans as of March 31, 2020 (in thousands):

IBLOC loans are backed by the cash value of life insurance policies which have been assigned to us. We lend up to 100% of such cash value. Our underwriting standards require approval of the insurance companies which carry the policies backing these loans. Currently, seven insurance companies have been approved and, as of January 21, 2020 all were rated Superior (A+ or better) by AM BEST. Moody’s ratings were at least A rated, and ranged from A3 to Aa2.

The following table summarizes our direct lease financing portfolio* by type as of March 31, 2020 (in thousands):

* Of the total $446.0 million of direct lease financing, $411.0 million consisted of vehicle leases with the remaining balance consisting of equipment leases.

The following table summarizes our direct lease financing portfolio by state as of March 31, 2020 (in thousands):

Allowance for ~~loan and lease~~credit losses. We review the adequacy of our allowance for ~~loan and lease~~credit losses on at least a quarterly basis to determine that the provision for ~~loan~~credit losses is made in an amount necessary to maintain our allowance at a level that is appropriate, based on management’s estimate of ~~inherent~~current expected credit losses. Our estimates of loan and lease losses are intended to, and, in management’s opinion, do, meet the criteria for accrual of loss contingencies in accordance with ASC 450, “Contingencies”, and ASC 310, “Receivables”. The process of evaluating this adequacy has two basic elements: first, the identification of problem loans or leases based on current financial information and the fair value of the underlying collateral; and second, a methodology for estimating general loss reserves. For loans or leases classified as “special mention,” “substandard” or “doubtful,” we reserve all losses inherent in the portfolio at the time we classify the loan or lease. This “specific” portion of the allowance is the total of potential, although unconfirmed, losses for individually classified loans. In this process, we establish specific reserves based on an analysis of the most probable sources of repayment and liquidation of collateral. While each impaired loan is individually evaluated, not every loan requires a reserve when the collateral value and estimated cash flows exceed the current balance.

The second phase of our analysis represents an allocation of the allowance. This methodology analyzes pools of loans that have similar characteristics and applies historical loss experience and other factors for each pool including management’s experience with similar loan and lease portfolios at other institutions, the historic loss experience of our peers and a review of statistical information from various industry reports to determine the allocable portion of the allowance. This estimate is intended to represent the potential unconfirmed and inherent losses within the portfolio. Individual loan pools are created for the following major loan categories: SBLOCs, SBA loans, direct lease financing and other specialty lending and consumer loans. We augment historical experience for each loan pool by accounting for such items as current economic conditions, current loan portfolio performance, loan policy or management changes, loan concentrations, increases in our lending limit, average loan size and other factors as appropriate. Our Chief Credit Officer oversees the loan review department processes and measures the adequacy of the allowance for ~~loan and lease~~credit losses independently of loan production ~~officers.~~ officers . For detailed information on the allowance for credit loss methodology, please see Note 6. to the financial statements.

At March 31, 2020, the allowance for credit losses amounted to $14.9 million which represented a $4.7 million increase over the $10.2 million at December 31, 2019. The increase reflected a $2.6 million addition resulting from the implementation of current expected credit loss accounting guidance during the first quarter of 2020. The increase also reflected an increased allowance for direct lease financing which experienced higher charge-offs during that quarter. Troubled debt restructured loans are individually considered by comparing collateral values with principal outstanding and establishing specific reserves within the allowance. At March 31, 2020 there were 12 troubled debt restructured loans with a balance of $17.4 million which had specific reserves of $1.0 million. Approximately $1.0 million of these reserves related to the non-guaranteed portion of SBA loans for start-up businesses with the balance attributable to leasing.

At ~~September 30, 2017,~~March 31, 2020, in excess of ~~50%~~60% of the total continuing loan portfolio had been ~~reviewed as a result of the coverage of each loan portfolio type.~~reviewed. The targeted coverages and scope of the reviews are risk-based and vary according to each portfolio. These thresholds are maintained as follows:

Securities Backed Lines of Credit (SBLOC) – The targeted review threshold for ~~2017~~2020 is 40%, with the largest 25% of SBLOCs by commitment to be reviewed annually. A random ~~sampling~~sample of a minimum of 20 of the remaining loans will be reviewed each quarter. At ~~September 30, 2017,~~March 31, 2020, approximately ~~50%~~57% of the SBLOC portfolio had been reviewed.

~~SBA Loans~~Insurance Backed Lines of Credit (IBLOC) – The targeted review threshold for ~~2017~~2020 is 40% with the largest 25% of IBLOCs by commitment to be reviewed annually. A random sample of the remaining loans will also be reviewed and a minimum of 20 loans will be reviewed each quarter. At March 31, 2020, approximately 76% of the IBLOC portfolio had been reviewed.

Small Business Loans – The vast majority of small business loans are comprised of SBA loans. The targeted review threshold for 2020 is 100%, to be reviewed within 90 days of funding, less guaranteed portions of any purchased loans. The 100% coverage includes ~~loan review work performed~~loans rated by designated SBA department ~~personnel.~~personnel, with a review threshold for the independent loan review department of loans exceeding $1.0 million and any classified loans. At ~~September 30, 2017,~~March 31, 2020, approximately 100% of the government guaranteed loan portfolio had been rated and/or reviewed. ~~The review threshold for the independent loan review department is $1,000,000.~~

Leasing – The targeted review threshold for ~~2017~~2020 is 35%. At ~~September 30, 2017,~~March 31, 2020, approximately ~~53%~~55% of the leasing portfolio had been reviewed. The loan balance review threshold is ~~$1,000,000.~~$1.0 million.

CMBS (Floating Rate) – The targeted review threshold for ~~2017~~2020 is 100%. Floating rate loans will be reviewed initially within 90 days of funding and will be monitored on an ongoing basis as to payment status. Subsequent reviews will be performed based on a sampling each quarter. Each floating rate loan will be reviewed if any available extension options are exercised. At ~~September 30, 2017,~~March 31, 2020, approximately ~~100%~~97% of the CMBS floating rate loans on the books for more than 90 days had been reviewed.

CMBS (Fixed Rate) – 100% of fixed rate loans that are unable to be readily sold on the secondary market and remain on the Bank's books after nine months will be reviewed at least annually. At ~~September 30, 2017,~~March 31, 2020, 100% of the CMBS fixed rate portfolio had been reviewed.

Specialty Lending – Specialty Lending, defined as commercial loans unique in nature that do not fit into other established categories, will have a review coverage threshold of 100% for ~~non CRA~~non-Community Reinvestment Act (“CRA”) loans. At ~~September 30, 2017,~~March 31, 2020, approximately 100% of the ~~non CRA~~non-CRA loans had been reviewed.

Home Equity Lines of Credit (HELOC) – The targeted review threshold for ~~2017~~2020 is 50%. The largest 25% of HELOCs by commitment will be reviewed annually. A random sampling of a minimum of ten of the remaining loans will be reviewed each quarter. At ~~September 30, 2017,~~March 31, 2020, approximately ~~84%~~54% of the HELOC portfolio had been reviewed.

The following ~~table presents~~tables present delinquencies by type of loan as ~~follows~~of the dates specified (in thousands):



	30-59 Days	60-89 Days	90 Days		Total		Total	March 31, 2020
September 30, 2017	past due	past due	or greater	Non-accrual	past due	Current	loans
SBA non real estate	$ 272	$ 165	$ -	$ 2,310	$ 2,747	$ 69,308	$ 72,055
SBA commercial mortgage	-	-	-	1,226	1,226	131,771	132,997
SBA construction	-	-	-	-	-	14,205	14,205
								30-59 Days	60-89 Days	90+ Days		Total		Total
								past due	past due	still accruing	Non-accrual	past due	Current	loans
SBL non-real estate								$ 185	$ 406	$ -	$ 3,565	$ 4,156	$ 80,790	$ 84,946
SBL commercial mortgage								-	-	-	1,047	1,047	232,173	233,220
SBL construction								-	-	-	711	711	48,112	48,823
Direct lease financing	5,065	1,060	354	-	6,479	362,590	369,069	9,079	1,459	2,245	-	12,783	433,184	445,967
SBLOC	-	-	-	-	-	720,279	720,279
SBLOC / IBLOC								10,835	-	-	-	10,835	1,145,598	1,156,433
Other specialty lending	-	-	-	-	-	36,664	36,664	-	-	-	-	-	2,711	2,711
Consumer - other	-	-	-	-	-	9,585	9,585	17	-	-	-	17	684	701
Consumer - home equity	144	-	-	1,417	1,561	8,961	10,522	-	-	-	322	322	3,000	3,322
Unamortized loan fees and costs	-	-	-	-	-	8,684	8,684	-	-	-	-	-	9,632	9,632
	$ 5,481	$ 1,225	$ 354	$ 4,953	$ 12,013	$ 1,362,047	$ 1,374,060	$ 20,116	$ 1,865	$ 2,245	$ 5,645	$ 29,871	$ 1,955,884	$ 1,985,755



	30-59 Days	60-89 Days	90 Days		Total		Total	December 31, 2019
December 31, 2016	past due	past due	or greater	Non-accrual	past due	Current	loans
SBA non real estate	$ 559	$ -	$ -	$ 1,530	$ 2,089	$ 72,555	$ 74,644
SBA commercial mortgage	-	-	-	-	-	126,159	126,159
SBA construction	-	-	-	-	-	8,826	8,826
								30-59 Days	60-89 Days	90+ Days		Total		Total
								past due	past due	still accruing	Non-accrual	past due	Current	loans
SBL non-real estate								$ 36	$ 125	$ -	$ 3,693	$ 3,854	$ 80,725	$ 84,579
SBL commercial mortgage								-	1,983	-	1,047	3,030	215,080	218,110
SBL construction								-	-	-	711	711	44,599	45,310
Direct lease financing	11,856	1,998	661	-	14,515	332,130	346,645	2,008	2,692	3,264	-	7,964	426,496	434,460
SBLOC	-	-	-	-	-	630,400	630,400
SBLOC / IBLOC								290	75	-	-	365	1,024,055	1,024,420
Other specialty lending	-	-	-	-	-	11,073	11,073	-	-	-	-	-	3,055	3,055
Consumer - other	-	-	-	-	-	5,403	5,403	-	-	-	-	-	1,137	1,137
Consumer - home equity	155	-	-	1,442	1,597	10,374	11,971	-	-	-	345	345	3,072	3,417
Unamortized loan fees and costs	-	-	-	-	-	7,790	7,790	-	-	-	-	-	9,757	9,757
	$ 12,570	$ 1,998	$ 661	$ 2,972	$ 18,201	$ 1,204,710	$ 1,222,911	$ 2,334	$ 4,875	$ 3,264	$ 5,796	$ 16,269	$ 1,807,976	$ 1,824,245

Although we consider our allowance for ~~loan and lease~~credit losses to be adequate based on information currently available, future additions to the allowance may be necessary due to changes in economic conditions, our ongoing loss experience and that of our peers, changes in management’s assumptions as to future delinquencies, recoveries and losses, deterioration of specific credits and management’s intent with regard to the disposition of loans and leases.

The following table summarizes select asset quality ratios for each of the periods indicated:



	As of or
	for the nine months ended		For the three months ended
	September 30,		or as of March 31,
	2017	2016	2020	2019

Ratio of the allowance for loan losses to total loans	0.53%	0.51%
Ratio of the allowance for loan losses to nonperforming loans *	137.23%	87.12%
Ratio of nonperforming assets to total assets *	0.13%	0.16%
Ratio of the allowance for credit losses to total loans			0.75%	0.66%
Ratio of the allowance for credit losses to non-performing loans *			188.63%	119.27%
Ratio of non-performing assets to total assets *			0.14%	0.18%
Ratio of net charge-offs to average loans	0.07%	0.01%	0.04%	0.02%
Ratio of net charge-offs to average loans annualized	0.09%	0.01%	0.17%	0.07%

* Includes loans 90 days past due still accruing interest.

NOTE: Because SBLOC and IBLOC loans are respectively collateralized by marketable securities and the cash value of life insurance, management excludes those loans from the ratio of the allowance to total loans in its internal analysis. Accordingly, the adjusted ratio is 1.79%.

The ratio of the allowance for ~~loan and lease~~credit losses to total loans ~~was 0.53%~~increased to 0.75% at ~~September 30, 2017, compared to 0.51%~~March 31, 2020 from 0.66% at ~~September 30, 2016.~~March 31, 2019. The increase primarily reflected a higher ~~current period ratio reflected an~~allowance for direct lease financing, with a lesser increase for the SBL commercial mortgage allowance. Those higher allowances also resulted in the increase in the ~~allowance which exceeded proportional loan growth during the period. The~~ ratio of the allowance for ~~loan~~credit losses to non-performing loans ~~increased~~ to ~~137.23%~~188.63% at ~~September 30, 2017,~~March 31, 2020, from ~~87.12%~~119.27% at ~~September 30, 2016, primarily as a result of a decrease in non-performing loans and an increase in the allowance.~~March 31, 2019. The ratio of non-performing assets to total assets decreased to ~~0.13%~~0.14% at ~~September 30, 2017,~~March 31, 2020, from ~~0.16%~~0.18% at ~~September 30, 2016,~~March 31, 2019, primarily as a result of ~~a decrease~~an increase in ~~non-performing loans.~~total assets. Net charge-offs to average loans increased to ~~0.07%~~0.04% for the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September 30, 2017,~~March 31, 2020 from ~~0.01%~~0.02% for the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September 30, 2016, primarily as a result of~~March 31, 2019. The increase resulted from higher ~~net charge offs.~~charge-offs in 2020 for direct lease financing.

Net charge-offs. Net charge-offs were ~~$1.2~~$1.4 million for the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September 30, 2017,~~March 31, 2020, an increase of ~~$1.0 million~~$956,000 from net charge-offs of ~~$152,000~~$399,000 during the same period of ~~2016.~~2019. The majority of the charge-offs in the first nine months of 2017 were associated with leasing relationships. The majority of the charge-offs in the first nine months of 2016 were associated with SBA non real estate and leasing relationships.increase resulted from direct lease financing.

Non-performing loans, loans 90 days delinquent and still accruing, and troubled debt restructurings. Loans are considered to be non-performing if they are on a non-accrual basis or they are past due 90 days or more and still accruing interest. A loan which is past due 90 days or more and still accruing interest remains on accrual status only when it is both adequately secured as to principal and interest, and is in the process of collection. Troubled debt restructurings are loans with terms that have been renegotiated to provide a reduction or deferral of interest or principal because of a weakening in the financial positions of the borrowers. The following tables summarize our non-performing loans, other real estate owned and loans past due 90 days or more still accruing interest (in thousands).:



		~~September 30,~~		~~December 31,~~

5462



			March 31,	December 31,
	2017	2016	2020	2019

Non-accrual loans
SBA non real estate	$ 2,310	$ 1,530
SBA commercial mortgage	1,226	-
SBL non-real estate			$ 3,565	$ 3,693
SBL commercial mortgage			1,047	1,047
SBL construction			711	711
Consumer	1,417	1,442	322	345
Total non-accrual loans	4,953	2,972	5,645	5,796

Loans past due 90 days or more	354	661
Loans past due 90 days or more and still accruing			2,245	3,264
Total non-performing loans	5,307	3,633	7,890	9,060
Other real estate owned	-	104	-	-
Total non-performing assets	$ 5,307	$ 3,737	$ 7,890	$ 9,060

In February 2020, a single borrower under financial stress, became delinquent on certain of their vehicle loans comprising a portion of their total loan balance, which was $15.3 million as of March 31, 2020. The borrower has agreed to an orderly liquidation of all vehicle loans in the second quarter of 2020 and the $15.3 million loan balance was classified as a troubled debt restructuring as of March 31, 2020. While the Company’s estimates of the disposition value of the vehicles exceed the amounts due, with no impact on the allowance for credit losses, there can be no assurance that all amounts will be fully collected or recovered from vehicle sales. Further, should the borrower declare bankruptcy, related court actions may impact the timing or amount of recovery. Loans that were modified as of ~~September 30, 2017~~March 31, 2020 and December 31, ~~2016~~2019 and considered troubled debt restructurings are as follows (dollars in thousands):



	September 30, 2017			December 31, 2016			March 31, 2020			December 31, 2019
	Number	Pre-modification recorded investment	Post-modification recorded investment	Number	Pre-modification recorded investment	Post-modification recorded investment	Number	Pre-modification recorded investment	Post-modification recorded investment	Number	Pre-modification recorded investment	Post-modification recorded investment
SBA non real estate	4	$ 1,013	$ 1,013	2	$ 844	$ 844
SBL non-real estate							8	$ 1,296	$ 1,296	8	$ 1,309	$ 1,309
Direct lease financing	1	285	285	1	734	734	2	15,620	15,620	1	286	286
Consumer	2	541	541	1	288	288	2	484	484	2	489	489
Total	7	$ 1,839	$ 1,839	4	$ 1,866	$ 1,866	12	$ 17,400	$ 17,400	11	$ 2,084	$ 2,084

The balances below provide information as to how the loans were modified as troubled debt restructurings loans at ~~September 30, 2017~~March 31, 2020 and December 31, ~~2016~~2019 (in thousands).



	September 30, 2017			December 31, 2016			March 31, 2020			December 31, 2019
	Adjusted interest rate	Extended maturity	Combined rate and maturity	Adjusted interest rate	Extended maturity	Combined rate and maturity	Adjusted interest rate	Extended maturity	Combined rate and maturity	Adjusted interest rate	Extended maturity	Combined rate and maturity
SBA non real estate	$ -	$ 144	$ 869	$ -	$ 144	$ 700
SBL non-real estate							$ -	$ 42	$ 1,254	$ -	$ 51	$ 1,258
Direct lease financing	-	-	285	-	-	734	-	286	15,333	-	286	-
Consumer	-	-	541	-	-	288	-	-	485	-	-	489
Total	$ -	$ 144	$ 1,695	$ -	$ 144	$ 1,722	$ -	$ 328	$ 17,072	$ -	$ 337	$ 1,747

~~As of September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, we~~The Company had no commitments to lend additional funds to ~~loan~~ customers whose loan terms have been modified in troubled debt ~~restructurings.~~restructurings as of either March 31, 2020 or December 31, 2019.

The following table provides information about ~~impaired~~ loans individually evaluated for expected credit loss at ~~September 30, 2017~~March 31, 2020 and December 31, ~~2016:~~2019 (dollars in thousands):



	March 31, 2020
	Recorded investment	Unpaid principal balance	Related allowance	Average recorded investment	Interest income recognized
Without an allowance recorded
SBL non-real estate	$ 266	$ 2,693	$ -	$ 301	$ 3
SBL commercial mortgage	76	76	-	76	-
SBL construction	-	-	-	-	-
Direct lease financing	15,620	15,620	-	7,953	278
Consumer - home equity	585	585	-	537	3
With an allowance recorded
SBL non-real estate	3,731	3,731	(2,805)	3,767	20
SBL commercial mortgage	971	971	(136)	971	-
SBL construction	711	711	(25)	711	-
Direct lease financing	-	-	-	-	-
Consumer - home equity	-	-	-	60	-
Total
SBL non-real estate	3,997	6,424	(2,805)	4,068	23
SBL commercial mortgage	1,047	1,047	(136)	1,047	-
SBL construction	711	711	(25)	711	-
Direct lease financing	15,620	15,620	-	7,953	278
Consumer - home equity	585	585	-	597	3
	$ 21,960	$ 24,387	$ (2,966)	$ 14,376	$ 304



December 31, 2016
						December 31, 2019
						Recorded investment	Unpaid principal balance	Related allowance	Average recorded investment	Interest income recognized
Without an allowance recorded
SBA non real estate	$ 191	$ 191	$ -	$ 336	$ -
SBL non-real estate						$ 335	$ 2,717	$ -	$ 277	$ 5
SBL commercial mortgage						76	76	-	15	-
SBL construction						-	-	-	284	-
Direct lease financing	-	-	-	-	-	286	286	-	362	11
Consumer - other	-	-	-	259	-
Consumer - home equity	1,730	1,730	-	1,187	-	489	489	-	1,161	9
With an allowance recorded
SBA non real estate	2,183	2,183	938	1,277	-
SBL non-real estate						3,804	4,371	(2,961)	3,925	30
SBL commercial mortgage						971	971	(136)	561	-
SBL construction						711	711	(36)	284	-
Direct lease financing	734	734	216	147	-	-	-	-	244	-
Consumer - other	-	-	-	-	-
Consumer - home equity	-	-	-	549	-	121	121	(9)	344	-
Total
SBA non real estate	2,374	2,374	938	1,613	-
SBL non-real estate						4,139	7,088	(2,961)	4,202	35
SBL commercial mortgage						1,047	1,047	(136)	576	-
SBL construction						711	711	(36)	568	-
Direct lease financing	734	734	216	147	-	286	286	-	606	11
Consumer - other	-	-	-	259	-
Consumer - home equity	1,730	1,730	-	1,736	-	610	610	(9)	1,505	9
	4,838	4,838	1,154	3,755	-	$ 6,793	$ 9,742	$ (3,142)	$ 7,457	$ 55

We had ~~$5.0~~$5.6 million of non-accrual loans at ~~September 30, 2017~~March 31, 2020 compared to ~~$3.0~~$5.8 million of non-accrual loans at December 31, ~~2016.~~2019. The ~~$2.0 million increase~~$151,000 decrease in non-accrual loans was primarily due to ~~$3.7 million~~$172,000 of loan payments and $264,000 of charge-offs partially offset by $285,000 of loans placed on non-accrual ~~status partially offset by $1.1 million of loan payments and $589,000 of charge-offs.~~status. Loans past due 90 days or more still accruing interest amounted to ~~$354,000~~$2.2 million at ~~September 30, 2017~~March 31, 2020 and ~~$661,000~~$3.3 million at December 31, ~~2016.~~2019. The ~~$307,000~~$1.1 million decrease reflected ~~$1.7~~$1.1 million of additions partially offset by ~~$1.3 million~~$396,000 of loan payments, ~~$144,000~~$919,000 of charge-offs and ~~$526,000~~$777,000 of loans moved to repossessed assets.

We had no other real estate owned at ~~September 30, 2017~~March 31, 2020 and ~~$104,000 at~~ December 31, ~~2016 with no additional activity during the intervening period.~~2019.

The following table classifies our loans (not including loans ~~held for sale)~~held-for-sale) by categories which are used throughout the industry as of ~~September 30, 2017 and~~ December 31, ~~2016:~~2019 (dollars in thousands):



	Pass	Special mention	Substandard	Doubtful	Loss	Unrated subject to review *	Unrated not subject to review *	Total loans
SBL non-real estate	$ 76,108	$ 3,045	$ 4,430	$ -	$ -	$ -	$ 996	$ 84,579
SBL commercial mortgage	208,809	2,249	5,577	-	-	-	1,475	218,110
SBL construction	44,599	-	711	-	-	-	-	45,310
Direct lease financing	420,289	-	8,792	-	-	-	5,379	434,460
SBLOC / IBLOC	942,858	-	-	-	-	-	81,562	1,024,420
Other specialty lending	3,055	-	-	-	-	-	-	3,055
Consumer	2,545	-	345	-	-	-	1,664	4,554
Unamortized loan fees and costs	-	-	-	-	-	-	9,757	9,757
	$ 1,698,263	$ 5,294	$ 19,855	$ -	$ -	$ -	$ 100,833	$ 1,824,245

* For information on targeted loan review thresholds see “Allowance for ~~Loan~~Credit Losses”.

Premises and equipment, net. Premises and equipment amounted to ~~$21.1~~$17.1 million at ~~September 30, 2017~~March 31, 2020 compared to ~~$24.1~~$17.5 million at December 31, ~~2016.~~2019. The decrease reflected depreciation and reduced ~~purchases compared to prior periods.~~purchases.

Investment in Unconsolidated Entity. On December 30, 2014, the Bank entered into an agreement for, and closed on, the sale of a portion of its discontinued Philadelphia commercial loan portfolio. The purchaser of the loan portfolio was a newly formed entity, Walnut Street 2014-1 Issuer, LLC (“Walnut Street”). The price paid to the Bank for the loan portfolio, which had a face value of approximately $267.6 million, was approximately $209.6 million, of which approximately $193.6 million was in the form of two notes issued by Walnut Street to the Bank; a senior note in the principal amount of approximately $178.2 million bearing interest at 1.5% per year and maturing in December 2024 and a subordinate note in the principal amount of approximately $15.4 million, bearing interest at 10.0% per year and maturing in December 2024. The balance of these notes comprise the ~~$107.7~~$34.3 million investment in unconsolidated entity at ~~September 30, 2017.~~March 31, 2020

~~The independent investor in~~. As of March 31, 2020, a $30 million credit, collateralized by a commercial retail property with multiple tenants, is comprised of a $17.0 million loan which had been sold to Walnut Street and a $13.0 million loan which is included in commercial loans held-for-sale. In 2019, as a result of an updated appraisal, this loan was marked down by $1.6 million. The charge to Walnut Street was based on the securitization into which the Bank sold certain loans when it discontinued its Philadelphia commercial loan operations, has taken actions which may result in litigation. Specifically, counsel for the independent investor has requested that the Note Administrator hold monthly distribution payments in escrow until the independent investor’s alternative interpretationratio of the ~~order of payments, as compared~~$17.0 million owned by that entity to the ~~interpretation~~$30 million loan balance, with the remainder of the ~~Bank~~charges reflected in net realized and ~~the Note Administrator, is resolved. Based~~unrealized gains on ~~the independent investor’s request, the Note Administrator withheld the September 2017 payment~~commercial loans originated for sale. This loan continues to pay as agreed according to the ~~independent investor and the Bank and indicated that it would continue to do so until this issue was resolved. Management~~terms of the ~~Company,~~March 13, 2019 renewal. The retail space is partially leased and remains on a path toward stabilization based on advice of its counsel, believes it is unlikely that the Bank and Note Administrator’s interpretation will be overturned. However, if such interpretation is overturned, based upon the current model used to value Walnut Street, an estimated $8 million loss may be recognized, based on currently estimated cash flows which would be redirected from the Bank to the independent investor.negotiations with prospective tenants.

Assets ~~held for sale.~~held-for-sale from discontinued operations. Assets ~~held for sale~~held-for-sale as a result of discontinued operations, primarily commercial, commercial mortgage and construction loans, amounted to ~~$315.0~~$134.1 million at March 31, 2020 and were comprised of $111.0 million of net loans and $23.1 million of other real estate owned. The March 31, 2020 balance of other real estate owned includes a Florida mall which has been written down to $15.0 million. We expect to continue our efforts to disposeof the mall, which was appraised in September ~~30, 2017 compared to $360.7 million at~~2018 for $16.9 million. At December 31, ~~2016. The decrease resulted primarily from loan repayments.~~2019, discontinued assets of $140.7 million were comprised of $115.9 million of net loans and $24.8 million of other real estate owned. We continue our efforts to transfer the loans to other financial institutions, and dispose of the other real estate owned.

Deposits. Our primary source of funding is deposit acquisition. We offer a variety of deposit accounts with a range of interest rates and terms, including demand, checking and money market accounts. ~~However, the~~The majority of our deposits are generated through prepaid card and other payments related ~~deposits.~~deposit accounts. One strategic focus is growing these accounts through affinity groups. At ~~September~~

~~30, 2017,~~March 31, 2020, we had total deposits of ~~$3.57~~$4.69 billion compared to ~~$4.24~~$5.05 billion at December 31, ~~2016,~~2019, a decrease of $~~672.9~~360.9 million, or ~~15.9%~~7.1%. The decrease reflected the ~~planned exit~~maturity of ~~higher cost~~$475.0 million of certificates of deposits, which were not replaced, as a result of increases in other deposit ~~relationships which did not have adequate income components.~~categories. The following table presents the average balance and rates paid on deposits for the periods indicated (in thousands):

* Non-interest bearing demand accounts are not paid interest. The amount shown as interest reflects the fees paid to affinity groups, which are based upon a rate index, and therefore classified as interest expense.

Short-term borrowings. Short-term borrowings consist of amounts borrowed on our line of credit with the FRB or FHLB. There was $140.0 million outstanding on our FRB line at March 31, 2020 and no outstandings on either line at December 31, 2019. We generally utilize overnight borrowings to manage our daily reserve requirements at the Federal Reserve. Period end and year to date information for the dates shown is as follows.

Borrowings. At ~~September 30, 2017,~~March 31, 2020, we had long-term borrowings of ~~$42.5~~$40.8 million compared to ~~$263.1~~$41.0 million at December 31, ~~2016.~~2019. The ~~$42.5 million outstanding at September 30, 2017, reflected the proceeds from two~~borrowings consisted of sold loans which were ~~sold in which we retained a participating interest. Long-term borrowings of $263.1 million at December 31, 2016 reflected the proceeds of loans sold into a securitization which, at that date, was~~ accounted for as a secured ~~borrowing. In the first quarter of 2017, the documentation required~~borrowing because they did not qualify for true sale ~~accounting was completed, and the sale was recorded in that quarter.~~accounting. We do not have any policy prohibiting us from incurring debt.

Other liabilities. Other liabilities amounted to ~~$32.7~~$74.6 million at ~~September 30, 2017~~March 31, 2020 compared to ~~$44.1~~$66.0 million at December 31, ~~2016,~~2019, representing an increase of ~~$11.4~~$8.7 million. ~~Other liabilities consist primarily of investment payables and accrued expenses.~~

~~Off~~Off- balance sheet arrangements. There were no off-balance sheet arrangements during the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September 30, 2017~~March 31, 2020 that have or are reasonably likely to have, a current or future effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources that is material to our interests.

Except as discussed in Item 2, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” there has been no material change in our assessment of our sensitivity to market risk since our presentation in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, ~~2016.~~2019.

We maintain disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our reports under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Exchange Act, is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Members of our operational management and internal audit meet regularly to provide an established structure to report any weaknesses or other issues with controls, or any matter that has not been reported previously, to our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, and, in turn to the Audit Committee of our Board of Directors. In designing and evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures, our management recognized that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives, and our management necessarily was required to apply its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures.

Under the supervision of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, we have carried out an evaluation of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based upon that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective at the reasonable assurance level.

There has been no change in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the quarter ended ~~September 30, 2017~~March 31, 2020 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

5967

PART II – OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

For a discussion of Legal Proceedings, see Part I, Financial Information, “Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements, Note 13--Legal.” which is incorporated herein by reference.

For a discussion of certain regulatory proceedings involving the FDIC and FRB, see Part I - Item ~~2 “Management’s~~2. “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of ~~Operations-Financial Statement Restatement;~~ Operations—Regulatory ~~Actions”.~~Actions.”

Item 1A. Risk Factors

Our business, financial condition, operating results and cash flows could be impacted by the factors in Item 1A. Risk Factors in the 2019 Form 10-K Report, and additionally by the following risk factors.

The ~~Company received a subpoena from~~Coronavirus is negatively impacting the SEC, dated March 22, 2016, relating to an investigation by the SEC of the Company's restatement of its financial statements for the years ended December 31, 2010 through December 31, 2013 and the interim periods ended March 31, 2014, September 30, 2014 and September 30, 2014, which restatement was filed with the SEC on September 28, 2015, and the facts and circumstances underlying the restatement. The Company is cooperating fully with the SEC's investigation. The costs to respond to the subpoena and cooperate with the SEC's investigation have been material, and we expect such costs to continue to be material at least through the completion of the SEC’s investigation.

The ~~Company received a letter, dated August 1, 2016, demanding inspection of its books and records pursuant to Section 220~~global pandemic resulting from the outbreak of the ~~Delaware General Corporation Law,~~ Coronavirus has negatively impacted the global economy, disrupted global supply chains, lowered equity market valuations, and increased unemployment levels. In addition, the pandemic has resulted in temporary closures of many businesses and the institution of social distancing and sheltering in place requirements in many states and communities. Some of the risks we face from the pandemic include, but are not limited to: the health and availability of our colleagues, the financial condition of our customers, the demand for our products and services, falling interest rates, recognition of credit losses and increases in the allowance for credit losses, especially if businesses remain closed, unemployment continues to rise and a significant deterioration of business conditions in our markets, For example, if the shutdown of automobile factories continues for an extended time, it may impact the supply of vehicles which the Bank could otherwise lease to its customers, possibly reducing growth in the leasing portfolio which would otherwise have increased revenues and net income.

Government stimulus and other regulatory efforts may not adequately offset the negative impact of the Coronavirus on the economy and on us.

The Coronavirus pandemic has impacted our business, and the ultimate impact on our business, financial position, results of operations and/or ~~DCGL, from legal counsel representing a shareholder (the "Demand Letter"). The Company, through outside legal counsel, responded~~cash flows will depend on future developments, which are highly uncertain and cannot be predicted, including, but not limited to, the ~~Demand Letter by permitting the shareholder to inspect certain~~scope and duration of the ~~Company’s books~~pandemic and ~~records~~the actions taken by governmental authorities and ~~by objecting to other requests. On January 30, 2017, the shareholder filed a complaint~~our business partners in the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware seeking an order from the court, pursuant to Section 220 of the DGCL, compelling the Company to permit the shareholder to inspect additional books and records of the Company. The Company believes that its original response to the ~~Demand Letter was appropriate~~pandemic. The CARES ACT recently enacted by Congress includes significant stimulus for the U.S. economy generally, both in ~~all respects~~the form of direct payments to individuals, and ~~continues~~specifically to ~~defend against~~small business in the ~~complaint. On July 27, 2017,~~form of assistance through the ~~Court of Chancery ruled in favor~~Payroll Protection Program administered by the SBA and other small business loans. The ultimate severity of the ~~Company~~economic impact of Coronavirus is not known, but its negative impact may exceed the effect of current or future government mitigation efforts, which could impact loan performance. Additionally, under regulatory guidance loans may be granted six month payment deferrals without classification as non-accrual, delinquency or troubled debt restructuring, barring other information which would require such classification. We have followed the guidance of regulators and ~~granted an Order~~are granting such deferrals, but the duration of ~~Final Judgment Denying Plaintiff’s Demand To Inspect The Books And Records~~the crisis is uncertain and government actions after that period are unknown. Accordingly, our future estimates for the provision for loan losses could increase while the estimated values of ~~Defendant. The court’s Order was~~loans accounted for on the basis of fair value could decrease, either of which would reduce our income.

There are no comparable recent events that provide guidance as to the effect the spread of the Coronavirus as a global pandemic may have, and, as a result, the ultimate impact of the outbreak is highly uncertain and subject to an appeal right which has now expired; no appeal was filed. Both the Demand Letter and the complaint threaten the commencement of a shareholder’s derivative suit against certain officers and directorschange. The full extent of the ~~Company seeking damages and other remedies~~impacts on ~~behalf of~~ the ~~Company. We have been advised by our counsel in~~Company’s operations or the ~~matter that reasonably possible losses cannot be estimated, but we and our counsel continue to believe~~global economy as a whole is not yet known. However, the ~~claim is without merit.~~

In addition, we are a party to various routine legal proceedings arising out of the ordinary course of our business. Management believes that none of these actions, individually or in the aggregate, willeffects could have a material ~~adverse effect~~impact on ~~our financial condition or operations.~~

the Company’s results of operations and heighten other of its known risks described in the Risk Factors section of the 2019 Form 10-K Report.

6068

Item 6. Exhibits

The Exhibits furnished as part of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q are identified in the Exhibit Index immediately following the signature page of this Report. Such Exhibit Index is incorporated herein by reference.


Exhibit No.		Description

31.1		Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certifications * *

31.2		Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certifications * *

32.1		Section 1350 Certifications * *

32.2		Section 1350 Certifications * *

101.INS		XBRL Instance Document

101.SCH		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document

101.CAL		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document

101.DEF		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document

101.LAB		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document

101.PRE		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document

*		Filed herewith

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.


		THE BANCORP, ~~INC~~INC.
		(Registrant)

~~November 9, 2017~~May 11, 2020		/s/S/ DAMIAN KOZLOWSKI
Date		Damian Kozlowski
		~~President/~~Chief Executive Officer

~~November 9, 2017~~May 11, 2020		/s/S/ PAUL FRENKIEL
Date		Paul Frenkiel Executive Vice President of Strategy,
		Chief Financial Officer and Secretary

6169


Delaware		23-3016517
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		(IRS Employer Identification No.)

409 Silverside Road, Wilmington, DE 19809		(302) 385-5000
(Address of principal executive offices and zip code)		(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)



Large accelerated filer ~~[ ]~~☐	Accelerated filer ~~[X]~~☒	Non-accelerated filer ~~[ ]~~☐
Smaller reporting company ~~[ ]~~☐	Emerging growth company ~~[ ]~~☐


Title of Each Class	Trading Symbol(s)	Name of each Exchange on Which Registered
Common Stock	TBBK	Nasdaq Global Select


		Page
Part I Financial Information
Item 1	Financial Statements:	34

	Consolidated Balance Sheets – ~~September 30, 2017~~March 31, 2020 (unaudited) and December 31, ~~2016~~2019	34

	Unaudited Consolidated Statements of Operations – Three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30, 2017~~March 31, 2020 and 20169	45

	Unaudited Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income – ~~Nine~~Three months ended ~~September 30, 2017~~March 31, 2020 and ~~2016~~2019	67

	Unaudited Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity – ~~Nine~~Three months ended ~~September 30, 2017~~March 31, 2020 and 2019	78

	Unaudited Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows – ~~Nine~~Three months ended ~~September 30, 2017~~March 31, 2020 and ~~2016~~2019	89

	Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements	10
Item 1A.	Risk Factors	39
Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	3843

Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	6067

Item 4.	Controls and Procedures	6067

Part II Other Information

Item 1.	Legal ~~proceedings~~Proceedings	6168
Item 6.	Exhibits	6269

Signatures		6269

Other	3,574	4,276	10,306	14,127
Total non-interest expense	43,883	44,171	119,029	156,445
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes	12,225	(1,475)	30,213	(45,135)
Income tax expense (benefit)	5,455	55	(457)	(15,324)
Net income (loss) from continuing operations	$ 6,770	$ (1,530)	$ 30,670	$ (29,811)
Discontinued operations
Income (loss) from discontinued operations before income taxes	829	(21,490)	5,488	(38,073)
Income tax expense (benefit)	318	2,531	2,050	(164)
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax	511	(24,021)	3,438	(37,909)
Net income (loss) available to common shareholders	$ 7,281	$ (25,551)	$ 34,108	$ (67,720)

Net income (loss) per share from continuing operations - basic	$ 0.12	$ (0.03)	$ 0.55	$ (0.73)
Net income (loss) per share from discontinued operations - basic	$ 0.01	$ (0.51)	$ 0.06	$ (0.92)
Net income (loss) per share - basic	$ 0.13	$ (0.54)	$ 0.61	$ (1.65)

Net income (loss) per share from continuing operations - diluted	$ 0.12	$ (0.03)	$ 0.55	$ (0.73)
Net income (loss) per share from discontinued operations - diluted	$ 0.01	$ (0.51)	$ 0.06	$ (0.92)
Net income (loss) per share - diluted	$ 0.13	$ (0.54)	$ 0.61	$ (1.65)


~~[X]~~☒		QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
		SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934



~~[ ]~~☐		TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OF 15(d) OF THE
		SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Net income per share from continuing operations - basic	$ 0.23	$ 0.31
Net income (loss) per share from discontinued operations - basic	$ (0.01)	$ 0.01
Net income per share - basic	$ 0.22	$ 0.32

Net income per share from continuing operations - diluted	$ 0.23	$ 0.31
Net income (loss) per share from discontinued operations - diluted	$ (0.01)	$ 0.01
Net income per share - diluted	$ 0.22	$ 0.32



	For the nine months
	ended September 30,
	2017	2016
	(in thousands)

Net income (loss)	$ 34,108	$ (67,720)
Other comprehensive income (loss) net of reclassifications into net income:

Other comprehensive income (loss)
Change in net unrealized gain during the period	8,194	19,207
Reclassification adjustments for gains included in income	(1,595)	(3,131)
Reclassification adjustments for foreign currency translation gains	216	335
Amortization of losses previously held as available-for-sale	25	25
Net unrealized gain	6,840	16,436

Deferred tax expense
Securities available-for-sale:
Change in net unrealized gain during the period	3,278	7,683
Reclassification adjustments for gains included in income	(638)	(1,252)
Amortization of losses previously held as available-for-sale	10	10
Income tax expense related to items of other comprehensive income	2,650	6,441

Other comprehensive income net of tax and reclassifications into net income	4,190	9,995
Comprehensive income (loss)	$ 38,298	$ (57,725)



Single issuer	Book value	Fair value	Unrealized gain/(loss)	Credit rating
Security A	$ 1,913	$ 2,031	$ 118	Not rated
Security B	9,104	6,343	(2,761)	Not rated

Class: All of the above are trust preferred securities.


	December 31, 2019		January 1, 2020		March 31, 2020
	Incurred loss method		CECL (day 1 adoption)		CECL
	Amount	% of Segment	Amount	% of Segment	Amount	% of Segment
Allowance for credit losses on loans and leases
SBL non real estate	$ 4,914	8.33%	$ 4,766	8.08%	$ 4,942	7.98%
SBL commercial mortgage	1,458	0.71%	2,009	0.98%	2,807	1.28%
SBL construction	432	0.95%	571	1.26%	795	1.63%
Direct lease financing	2,426	0.56%	4,788	1.10%	5,558	1.25%
SBLOC	440	0.05%	440	0.05%	462	0.05%
IBLOC	113	0.08%	72	0.05%	114	0.05%
Other specialty lending (1)	97	0.39%	170	0.40%	157	0.40%
Consumer - other	40	0.88%	58	1.27%	48	1.19%
Unallocated	318		-		-
	$ 10,238	0.56%	$ 12,874	0.71%	$ 14,883	0.75%

Liabilities:
Allowance for credit losses on off-balance sheet credit	-		569		786
Total allowance for credit losses	$ 10,238		$ 13,443		$ 15,669

Ending balance: Individually evaluated for impairment	$ 2,645	$ 1,226	$ -	$ 284	$ -	$ -	$ 1,700	$ -	$ 5,855

Ending balance: Collectively evaluated for impairment	$ 69,410	$ 131,771	$ 14,205	$ 368,785	$ 720,279	$ 36,664	$ 18,407	$ 8,684	$ 1,368,205


Remaining 2020		$ 111,292
2021		103,685
2022		68,837
2023		39,195
2024		16,575
2025 and thereafter		2,853
Total undiscounted cash flows		342,437
Residual value *		151,747
Difference between undiscounted cash flows and discounted cash flows		(48,191)


	Principal for loans with deferral requests	Total principal by loan category	% of total loan principal with deferral requests
Commercial real estate loans held for sale (excluding SBA loans)	$ 10,100	$ 1,496,528	<1%
Securities backed lines of credit & insurance backed lines of credit	10,484	1,156,433	1%
Small business lending, substantially all SBA loans	127,398	585,466	22%
Direct lease financing	79,579	445,967	18%
Discontinued operations	17,402	115,677	15%
Other consumer loans and specialty lending	1,143	6,734	17%
Total	$ 246,106	$ 3,806,805	6%



	Nine months ended September 30,
	2017			2016
	Average		Average	Average		Average
	Balance	Interest	Rate	Balance	Interest	Rate
	(dollars in thousands)
Assets:
Interest earning assets:
Loans net of unearned fees and costs **	$ 1,740,655	$ 58,266	4.46%	$ 1,543,448	$ 48,061	4.15%
Leases - bank qualified*	21,167	1,231	7.75%	20,618	1,334	8.63%
Investment securities-taxable	1,269,922	26,990	2.83%	1,280,692	22,782	2.37%
Investment securities-nontaxable*	14,423	351	3.24%	59,892	983	2.19%
Interest earning deposits at Federal Reserve Bank	532,223	3,961	0.99%	490,037	1,677	0.46%
Federal funds sold and securities purchased under agreement to resell	60,119	931	2.06%	27,414	301	1.46%
Net interest earning assets	3,638,509	91,730	3.36%	3,422,101	75,138	2.93%

Allowance for loan and lease losses	(6,793)			(4,538)
Assets held for sale from discontinued operations	337,102	9,594	3.79%	528,168	15,037	3.80%
Other assets	251,629			283,171
	$ 4,220,447			$ 4,228,902

Liabilities and shareholders' equity:
Deposits:
Demand and interest checking	$ 3,433,027	$ 8,836	0.34%	$ 3,325,047	$ 7,217	0.29%
Savings and money market	434,768	1,718	0.53%	390,202	1,028	0.35%
Time	-	-	0.00%	103,624	447	0.58%
Total deposits	3,867,795	10,554	0.36%	3,818,873	8,692	0.30%

Short-term borrowings	19,498	197	1.35%	58,056	263	0.60%
Repurchase agreements	245	-	0.00%	812	1	0.16%
Subordinated debt	13,401	432	4.30%	13,401	383	3.81%
Total deposits and interest bearing liabilities	3,900,939	11,183	0.38%	3,891,142	9,339	0.32%

Other liabilities	431			21,306
Total liabilities	3,901,370			3,912,448

Shareholders' equity	319,077			316,454
	$ 4,220,447			$ 4,228,902

Net interest income on tax equivalent basis *		$ 90,141			$ 80,836

Tax equivalent adjustment		554			811

Net interest income		$ 89,587			$ 80,025

Net interest margin *			3.02%			2.57%

* Full taxable equivalent basis, using a 35% statutory tax rate.
** Includes loans held for sale.


		Loan principal
U.S. government guaranteed portion of SBA loans (a)		$ 303,546
Commercial mortgage SBA (b)		146,656
Construction SBA (c)		28,704
Unguaranteed portion of U.S. government guaranteed loans (d)		85,637
Non-SBA small business loans (e)		20,923
Total principal		$ 585,466
Fair value adjustment		5,510
Unamortized fees		4,083
Total small business loans		$ 595,059


	SBL commercial mortgage*	SBL construction*	SBL non-real estate	Total	% Total
Hotels	$ 61,897	$ 16,831	$ 2	$ 78,730	28%
Professional services offices	16,582	388	4,627	21,597	8%
Full-service restaurants	15,025	806	5,598	21,429	8%
Child day care and youth services	18,005	808	788	19,601	7%
Bakeries	4,382	-	11,823	16,205	6%
Fitness/rec centers and instruction	8,425	-	4,121	12,546	4%
General warehousing and storage	10,853	-	-	10,853	4%
Limited-service restaurants and catering	6,555	-	3,749	10,304	4%
Elderly assisted living facilities	576	6,753	2,863	10,192	4%
Amusement and recreation industries	4,654	708	771	6,133	2%
Car washes	2,887	2,381	-	5,268	2%
Funeral homes	4,812	-	-	4,812	2%
New and used car dealers	3,930	-	-	3,930	1%
Automotive servicing	2,512	-	710	3,222	1%
Other	33,821	5,226	18,051	57,098	20%
	$ 194,916	$ 33,901	$ 53,103	$ 281,920	100%


Type*	State	SBL commercial mortgage*	SBL construction*	Total
Professional services office	CA	$ 9,024	$ -	$ 9,024
Hotel	FL	8,729	-	8,729
General warehouse	PA	7,568	-	7,568
Hotel	NC	-	5,774	5,774
Hotel	FL	5,291	-	5,291
Hotel	NC	4,747	-	4,747
Assisted living facility	FL	-	4,746	4,746
Fitness and rec center	PA	4,510	-	4,510
Hotel	PA	4,172	-	4,172
Hotel	NY	3,605	-	3,605
		$ 47,646	$ 10,520	$ 58,166


	# Loans	Balance	Origination date LTV	Weighted average minimum interest rate
Multifamily (apartments)	175	$ 1,364,413	77%	4.75%
Hospitality (hotels and lodging) *	11	57,874	62%	5.69%
Retail	7	50,725	72%	4.94%
Other	8	23,516	69%	5.18%
	201	$ 1,496,528	76%	4.80%
Fair value adjustment		(4,066)
Total		$ 1,492,462


	Balance	Origination date LTV
Texas	$ 374,583	77%
Georgia	230,101	78%
Arizona	116,926	76%
North Carolina	108,435	77%
Nevada	55,808	80%
Alabama	52,640	76%
Other states each <$50 million	558,035	76%
	$ 1,496,528	76%


Type	Principal	% of total
Securities backed lines of credit (SBLOC)	$ 927,613	80%
Insurance backed lines of credit (IBLOC)	228,820	20%
Total	$ 1,156,433	100%


	Number of loans	Principal balances	Market value of collateral	% Principal to collateral
0-5%	7	$ 4,289	$ 5,423	79%
5-10%	19	23,815	31,600	75%
10-15%	40	25,794	36,514	71%
15%+	85	49,993	78,845	63%
Subtotal*	151	$ 103,891	$ 152,382	69%
Remaining portfolio	4,498	823,722	3,598,310	23%
Total	4,649	$ 927,613	$ 3,750,692	25%


		Principal amount		% Principal to collateral
		$ 22,150		22%
		18,750		47%
		14,428		29%
		11,400		82%
		10,044		57%
		9,465		31%
		9,164		76%
		7,968		22%
		7,808		20%
		7,560		23%
		$ 118,737		40%


	Principal balance	% Total
Government agencies and public institutions**	$ 78,891	18%
Construction	75,564	17%
Waste management and remediation services	61,736	14%
Real estate, rental and leasing	44,680	10%
Retail trade	39,555	9%
Transportation and warehousing	28,593	6%
Health care and social assistance	25,653	6%
Professional, scientific, and technical services	20,349	5%
Manufacturing	14,898	3%
Wholesale trade	13,793	3%
Educational services	10,767	2%
Arts, entertainment, and recreation	5,340	1%
Other	26,148	6%
	$ 445,967	100%


	Principal balance	% Total
Florida	$ 116,369	26%
Pennsylvania	27,337	6%
New Jersey	27,113	6%
New York	24,794	6%
North Carolina	21,673	5%
Maryland	20,989	5%
California	20,607	5%
Utah	19,736	4%
Washington	15,683	4%
South Carolina	14,195	3%
Texas	13,627	3%
Georgia	13,374	3%
Alabama	12,373	3%
Connecticut	9,476	2%
Missouri	7,068	2%
Other states	81,553	18%
	$ 445,967	100%



		For the nine months ended		For the year ended
		September 30, 2017		December 31, 2016
		Average	Average	Average	Average
		balance	rate	balance	rate

Demand and interest checking *		$ 3,433,027	0.34%	$ 3,347,191	0.28%
Savings and money market		434,768	0.53%	394,434	0.39%
Time		-	0.00%	77,576	0.58%
	Total deposits	$ 3,867,795	0.36%	$ 3,819,201	0.30%