UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)


~~[X]~~
x		QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
		SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended: September 30, ~~2017~~2023



~~[ ]~~o		TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OFOR 15(d) OF THE
		SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from: _____ to _____

Commission file number: ~~51018~~000-51018

THE BANCORP, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)


Delaware		23-3016517
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		(IRS Employer Identification No.)

409 Silverside Road, Wilmington, DE 19809		(302) 385-5000
(Address of principal executive offices and zip code)		(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:



Title of Each Class	Trading Symbol(s)	Name of each Exchange on Which Registered
Common Stock, par value $1.00 per share	TBBK	Nasdaq Global Select

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ~~[X]~~x No ~~[ ]~~o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically ~~and posted on its corporate Web site, if any,~~ every Interactive Data File required to be submitted ~~and posted~~ pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit ~~and post~~ such files). Yes ~~[X]~~x No ~~[ ]~~o

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated ~~filer”,~~filer,” “smaller reporting company” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. ~~(Check one):~~



Large accelerated filer ~~[ ]~~ x	Accelerated filer ~~[X]~~ o	Non-accelerated filer ~~[ ]~~ o
Smaller reporting company ~~[ ]~~o	Emerging growth company ~~[ ]~~o

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ~~[ ]~~o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ~~[ ]~~o No ~~[X]~~x

~~Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer's classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.~~

As of ~~November 7, 2017,~~October 27, 2023, there were ~~55,859,660~~53,655,734 outstanding shares of common stock, $1.00 par value.

THE BANCORP, INC

Form 10-Q Index


		~~Page~~
		Page
Part I Financial Information
Item 11.	Financial Statements:	3

	Consolidated Balance Sheets – September 30, ~~2017~~2023 (unaudited) and December 31, ~~2016~~2022	3

	Unaudited Consolidated Statements of Operations – Three and nine months ended September 30, ~~2017~~2023 and ~~201~~20226	4

	Unaudited Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income – ~~Nine~~Three and nine months ended September 30, ~~2017~~2023 and ~~2016~~2022	65

	Unaudited Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity – ~~Nine~~Three and nine months ended September 30, ~~2017~~2023 and 2022	76

	Unaudited Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows – Nine months ended September 30, ~~2017~~2023 and ~~2016~~2022	8

	Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements	109

Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	3841

Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	6069

Item 4.	Controls and Procedures	6069

Part II Other Information

Item 1.	Legal ~~proceedings~~Proceedings	6170
Item 6.1A.	~~Exhibits~~Risk Factors	6270
Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	70
Item 6.	~~Signatures~~Exhibits		6271

Signatures		72

PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial ~~Statements~~Statements

THE BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED ~~BALANCE~~BALANCE SHEETS


	September 30,	December 31,	September 30,		December 31,
	2017	2016	2023		2022
(in thousands, except share data)				(unaudited)
	(unaudited)
	(in thousands)
ASSETS
Cash and cash equivalents
Cash and due from banks	$ 5,813	$ 4,127	$	4,881	$	24,063
Interest earning deposits at Federal Reserve Bank	328,023	955,733
Securities purchased under agreements to resell	65,095	39,199
Interest-earning deposits at Federal Reserve Bank				898,533		864,126
Total cash and cash equivalents	398,931	999,059		903,414		888,189

Investment securities, available-for-sale, at fair value	1,196,956	1,248,614		756,636		766,016
Investment securities, held-to-maturity (fair value $85,099 and $91,799, respectively)	86,402	93,467
Commercial loans held for sale	380,272	663,140
Commercial loans, at fair value				379,603		589,143
Loans, net of deferred loan fees and costs	1,374,060	1,222,911		5,198,972		5,486,853
Allowance for loan and lease losses	(7,283)	(6,332)
Allowance for credit losses				(24,145)		(22,374)
Loans, net	1,366,777	1,216,579		5,174,827		5,464,479
Federal Home Loan Bank and Atlantic Central Bankers Bank stock	991	1,613
Federal Home Loan Bank, Atlantic Central Bankers Bank, and Federal Reserve Bank stock				20,157		12,629
Premises and equipment, net	21,087	24,125		28,978		18,401
Accrued interest receivable	10,131	10,589		34,159		32,005
Intangible assets, net	5,185	6,906		1,751		2,049
Other real estate owned	-	104		18,756		21,210
Deferred tax asset, net	53,017	55,666		20,379		19,703
Investment in unconsolidated entity, at fair value	107,711	126,930
Assets held for sale from discontinued operations	314,994	360,711
Other assets	51,164	50,611		127,107		89,176
Total assets	$ 3,993,618	$ 4,858,114	$	7,465,767	$	7,903,000

LIABILITIES
Deposits
Demand and interest checking	$ 3,113,212	$ 3,816,524	$	6,455,043	$	6,559,617
Savings and money market	452,183	421,780		49,428		140,496
Time deposits, $100,000 and over				—		330,000
Total deposits	3,565,395	4,238,304		6,504,471		7,030,113

Securities sold under agreements to repurchase	180	274		42		42
Senior debt				95,771		99,050
Subordinated debentures	13,401	13,401		13,401		13,401
Long-term borrowings	42,482	263,099
Other long-term borrowings				9,861		10,028
Other liabilities	32,699	44,073		68,533		56,335
Total liabilities	3,654,157	4,559,151		6,692,079		7,208,969

SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
Common stock - authorized, 75,000,000 shares of $1.00 par value; 55,859,660 and 55,419,204
shares issued at September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively	55,860	55,419
Treasury stock, at cost (100,000 shares)	(866)	(866)
Common stock - authorized, 75,000,000 shares of $1.00 par value; 53,867,129 and 55,689,627
shares issued and outstanding at September 30, 2023 and December 31, 2022, respectively				53,867		55,690
Additional paid-in capital	362,340	360,564		234,320		299,279
Accumulated deficit	(77,850)	(111,941)
Retained earnings				517,587		369,319
Accumulated other comprehensive loss	(23)	(4,213)		(32,086)		(30,257)
Total shareholders' equity	339,461	298,963		773,688		694,031

Total liabilities and shareholders' equity	$ 3,993,618	$ 4,858,114	$	7,465,767	$	7,903,000

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated statements.

‎

THE BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS


	For the three months ended September 30,				For the nine months ended September 30,
	2023		2022		2023		2022
	(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
Interest income
Loans, including fees	$	110,592	$	75,579	$	324,229	$	181,320
Investment securities:
Taxable interest		9,647		6,792		28,820		17,115
Tax-exempt interest		40		25		114		74
Interest-earning deposits		8,689		1,525		24,271		2,876
		128,968		83,921		377,434		201,385
Interest expense
Deposits		38,431		16,065		110,307		23,261
Short-term borrowings		—		1,235		234		1,267
Long-term borrowings		128		506		382		506
Senior debt		1,234		1,279		3,793		3,838
Subordinated debentures		293		177		825		432
		40,086		19,262		115,541		29,304
Net interest income		88,882		64,659		261,893		172,081
Provision for credit losses		1,752		822		4,016		4,331
Net interest income after provision for credit losses		87,130		63,837		257,877		167,750

Non-interest income
ACH, card and other payment processing fees		2,553		2,230		7,153		6,552
Prepaid, debit card and related fees		21,513		19,175		67,013		57,865
Net realized and unrealized gains
on commercial loans, at fair value		525		745		4,171		11,262
Leasing related income		1,767		1,048		4,768		3,566
Other		422		228		2,000		698
Total non-interest income		26,780		23,426		85,105		79,943

Non-interest expense
Salaries and employee benefits		30,475		28,001		93,427		77,848
Depreciation and amortization		644		685		2,046		2,224
Rent and related occupancy cost		1,510		1,268		4,265		3,831
Data processing expense		1,404		1,292		4,123		3,727
Printing and supplies		82		154		355		342
Audit expense		446		366		1,255		1,107
Legal expense		1,203		907		3,110		3,175
Legal settlement		—		—		—		1,152
Civil money penalty		—		1,750		—		1,750
Amortization of intangible assets		99		99		298		298
FDIC insurance		806		679		2,233		2,326
Software		4,427		4,001		12,981		12,030
Insurance		1,321		1,314		3,935		3,692
Telecom and IT network communications		305		368		1,044		1,119
Consulting		448		339		1,412		902
Writedowns and other losses on other real estate owned		131		—		1,315		—
Other		4,158		3,607		13,633		10,504
Total non-interest expense		47,459		44,830		145,432		126,027
Income before income taxes		66,451		42,433		197,550		121,666
Income tax expense		16,314		11,829		49,282		31,694
Net income	$	50,137	$	30,604	$	148,268	$	89,972

Net income per share - basic	$	0.93	$	0.54	$	2.70	$	1.58

Net income per share - diluted	$	0.92	$	0.54	$	2.68	$	1.56

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated statements.

‎

THE BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME



	For the three months ended September 30,				For the nine months ended September 30,
	2023		2022		2023		2022
	(Dollars in thousands)

Net income	$	50,137	$	30,604	$	148,268	$	89,972
Other comprehensive loss, net of reclassifications into net income:

Other comprehensive loss
Securities available-for-sale:
Change in net unrealized losses during the period		(4,310)		(14,431)		(2,510)		(53,982)
Reclassification adjustments for losses included in income		—		—		4		6
Other comprehensive loss		(4,310)		(14,431)		(2,506)		(53,976)

Income tax benefit related to items of other comprehensive loss
Securities available-for-sale:
Change in net unrealized losses during the period		(1,164)		(3,897)		(678)		(14,576)
Reclassification adjustments for losses included in income		—		—		1		2
Income tax benefit related to items of other comprehensive loss		(1,164)		(3,897)		(677)		(14,574)

Other comprehensive loss, net of tax and reclassifications into net income		(3,146)		(10,534)		(1,829)		(39,402)
Comprehensive income	$	46,991	$	20,070	$	146,439	$	50,570

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated statements.

THE BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY


For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2023
(Dollars in thousands, except share data)

									Accumulated
	Common				Additional				other
	stock		Common		paid-in		Retained		comprehensive
	shares		stock		capital		earnings		(loss) income		Total

Balance at January 1, 2023		55,689,627	$	55,690	$	299,279	$	369,319	$	(30,257)	$	694,031
Net income		—		—		—		49,122		—		49,122
Common stock issued from option exercises,
net of tax benefits		13,158		13		92		—		—		105
Common stock issued from restricted units,
net of tax benefits		405,286		405		(405)		—		—		—
Stock-based compensation		—		—		3,169		—		—		3,169
Common stock repurchases and excise tax		(778,442)		(778)		(24,321)		—		—		(25,099)
Other comprehensive income net of
reclassification adjustments and tax		—		—		—		—		3,820		3,820
Balance at March 31, 2023		55,329,629	$	55,330	$	277,814	$	418,441	$	(26,437)	$	725,148

Net income		—	$	—	$	—	$	49,009	$	—	$	49,009
Common stock issued from restricted units,
net of tax benefits		41,382		41		(41)		—		—		—
Stock-based compensation		—		—		2,750		—		—		2,750
Common stock repurchases and excise tax		(828,727)		(829)		(24,408)		—		—		(25,237)
Other comprehensive loss net of
reclassification adjustments and tax		—		—		—		—		(2,503)		(2,503)
Balance at June 30, 2023		54,542,284	$	54,542	$	256,115	$	467,450	$	(28,940)	$	749,167

Net income		—	$	—	$	—	$	50,137	$	—	$	50,137
Common stock issued from restricted units,
net of tax benefits		—		10		(10)		—		—		—
Stock-based compensation		10,323		—		2,775		—		—		2,775
Common stock repurchases		(685,478)		(685)		(24,560)		—		—		(25,245)
Other comprehensive loss net of
reclassification adjustments and tax		—		—		—		—		(3,146)		(3,146)
Balance at September 30, 2023		53,867,129	$	53,867	$	234,320	$	517,587	$	(32,086)	$	773,688

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated statements.

‎

THE BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED ~~STATEMENTS~~STATEMENT OF ~~OPERATIONS~~CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY

For the three months ended September 30,

For the nine months ended September 30,

2017

2016

2017

2016

(in thousands, except per share data)
Interest income

Loans, including fees

$               21,420

$               17,697

$               59,066

$               48,928
Interest on investment securities:

Taxable interest

8,847

8,350

26,990

22,782
Tax-exempt interest

86

142

228

639
Federal funds sold/securities purchased under agreements to resell

371

146

931

301
Interest earning deposits

1,190

397

3,961

1,677

31,914

26,732

91,176

74,327
Interest expense

Deposits

3,688

2,906

10,554

8,692
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase

-

-

-

1
Short-term borrowings

175

153

197

263
Subordinated debenture

150

131

432

383

4,013

3,190

11,183

9,339
Net interest income

27,901

23,542

79,993

64,988
Provision for loan and lease losses

800

750

2,150

1,810
Net interest income after provision for loan and lease losses

27,101

22,792

77,843

63,178

Non-interest income

Service fees on deposit accounts

1,700

1,510

4,895

3,335
Card payment and ACH processing fees

1,564

1,459

4,596

4,183
Prepaid card fees

12,491

12,249

39,272

39,333
Gain on sale of loans

11,394

903

17,535

809
Gain on sale of investment securities

506

981

1,595

3,131
Change in value of investment in unconsolidated entity

(4)

811

(20)

(12,313)
Leasing income

705

588

2,088

1,456
Affinity fees

275

1,091

1,445

3,507
Gain on sale of health savings accounts

-

-

2,538

-
Loss from sale of European prepaid operations

-

-

(3,437)

-
Other

376

312

892

4,691
Total non-interest income

29,007

19,904

71,399

48,132

Non-interest expense

Salaries and employee benefits

21,788

21,508

57,902

62,400
Depreciation and amortization

1,080

1,241

3,405

3,751
Rent and related occupancy cost

1,368

1,638

4,227

4,797
Data processing expense

1,926

3,507

8,047

10,949
One time fee to exit data processing contract

1,136

-

1,136

-
Printing and supplies

282

825

1,120

2,194
Audit expense

393

246

1,270

746
Legal expense

2,744

814

5,909

3,786
Amortization of intangible assets

377

394

1,133

1,032
Losses on sale and write downs on other real estate owned

-

-

19

-
FDIC insurance

2,063

2,436

7,586

7,118
Software

3,088

3,032

9,328

8,266
Insurance

633

631

1,853

1,695
Telecom and IT network communications

426

582

1,443

1,547
Securitization and servicing expense

-

-

100

747
Consulting

505

1,701

1,745

4,214
Bank Secrecy Act and lookback consulting expenses

-

1,340

-

29,076
Civil money penalty

2,500

-

2,500

-


For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2022
(Dollars in thousands, except share data)
									Accumulated
	Common				Additional				other
	stock		Common		paid-in		Retained		comprehensive
	shares		stock		capital		earnings		income (loss)		Total

Balance at January 1, 2022		57,370,563	$	57,371	$	349,686	$	239,106	$	6,291	$	652,454
Net income		—		—		—		28,966		—		28,966
Common stock issued from option exercises,
net of tax benefits		27,818		27		57		—		—		84
Common stock issued from restricted units,
net of tax benefits		284,040		284		(284)		—		—		—
Stock-based compensation		—		—		1,618		—		—		1,618
Common stock repurchases		(527,393)		(527)		(14,473)		—		—		(15,000)
Other comprehensive loss net of
reclassification adjustments and tax		—		—		—		—		(15,827)		(15,827)
Balance at March 31, 2022		57,155,028	$	57,155	$	336,604	$	268,072	$	(9,536)	$	652,295

Net income		—	$	—	$	—	$	30,402	$	—	$	30,402
Common stock issued from option exercises,
net of tax benefits		7,500		7		71		—		—		78
Common stock issued from restricted units,
net of tax benefits		280,892		281		(281)		—		—		—
Stock-based compensation		—		—		1,802		—		—		1,802
Common stock repurchases		(577,926)		(578)		(14,422)		—		—		(15,000)
Other comprehensive loss net of
reclassification adjustments and tax		—		—		—		—		(13,041)		(13,041)
Balance at June 30, 2022		56,865,494	$	56,865	$	323,774	$	298,474	$	(22,577)	$	656,536

Net income	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	30,604	$	—	$	30,604
Stock-based compensation		—		—		2,131		—		—		2,131
Common stock repurchases		(663,934)		(663)		(14,336)		—		—		(14,999)
Other comprehensive loss net of
reclassification adjustments and tax		—		—		—		—		(10,534)		(10,534)
Balance at September 30, 2022		56,201,560	$	56,202	$	311,569	$	329,078	$	(33,111)	$	663,738

Other

3,574

4,276

10,306

14,127
Total non-interest expense

43,883

44,171

119,029

156,445
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes

12,225

(1,475)

30,213

(45,135)
Income tax expense (benefit)
5,455

55

(457)

(15,324)
Net income (loss) from continuing operations

$                 6,770

$               (1,530)

$               30,670

$             (29,811)
Discontinued operations

Income (loss) from discontinued operations before income taxes

829

(21,490)

5,488

(38,073)
Income tax expense (benefit)
318

2,531

2,050

(164)
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax

511

(24,021)

3,438

(37,909)
Net income (loss) available to common shareholders

$                 7,281

$             (25,551)

$               34,108

$             (67,720)

Net income (loss) per share from continuing operations - basic

$                   0.12

$                 (0.03)

$                   0.55

$                 (0.73)
Net income (loss) per share from discontinued operations - basic

$                   0.01

$                 (0.51)

$                   0.06

$                 (0.92)
Net income (loss) per share - basic

$                   0.13

$                 (0.54)

$                   0.61

$                 (1.65)

Net income (loss) per share from continuing operations - diluted

$                   0.12

$                 (0.03)

$                   0.55

$                 (0.73)
Net income (loss) per share from discontinued operations - diluted

$                   0.01

$                 (0.51)

$                   0.06

$                 (0.92)
Net income (loss) per share - diluted

$                   0.13

$                 (0.54)

$                   0.61

$                 (1.65)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated ~~statements.~~statements.

‎

THE BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF ~~COMPREHENSIVE INCOME~~CASH FLOWS

For the nine months

ended September 30,

2017

2016

(in thousands)

Net income (loss)
$                  34,108

$               (67,720)
Other comprehensive income (loss) net of reclassifications into net income:

Other comprehensive income (loss)

Change in net unrealized gain during the period
8,194

19,207
Reclassification adjustments for gains included in income
(1,595)

(3,131)
Reclassification adjustments for foreign currency translation gains
216

335
Amortization of losses previously held as available-for-sale
25

25
Net unrealized gain
6,840

16,436

Deferred tax expense

Securities available-for-sale:

Change in net unrealized gain during the period
3,278

7,683
Reclassification adjustments for gains included in income
(638)

(1,252)
Amortization of losses previously held as available-for-sale
10

10
Income tax expense related to items of other comprehensive income
2,650

6,441

Other comprehensive income net of tax and reclassifications into net income
4,190

9,995
Comprehensive income (loss)
$                  38,298

$               (57,725)



	For the nine months
	ended September 30,
	2023		2022
		(Dollars in thousands)
Operating activities
Net income	$	148,268	$	89,972
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities
Depreciation and amortization		2,344		2,522
Provision for credit losses		4,016		4,331
Net amortization of investment securities discounts/premiums		703		1,356
Stock-based compensation expense		8,694		5,551
Gain on commercial loans, at fair value		(5,852)		(15,034)
Writedown of other real estate owned		1,147		—
Change in fair value of commercial loans, at fair value		1,700		5,278
Change in fair value of derivatives		(19)		(1,505)
Loss on sales of investment securities		4		6
Increase in accrued interest receivable		(2,154)		(7,635)
Increase in other assets		(45,102)		(5,563)
Increase (decrease) in other liabilities		11,616		(10,971)
Net cash provided by operating activities		125,365		68,308

Investing activities
Purchase of investment securities available-for-sale		(48,989)		(19,321)
Proceeds from redemptions and prepayments of securities available-for-sale		55,151		127,374
Proceeds from sale of other real estate owned		2,044		—
Sale of repossessed assets		6,671		852
Net decrease (increase) in loans		278,373		(1,459,304)
Commercial loans, at fair value drawn during the period		(105,192)		(36,877)
Payments on commercial loans, at fair value		317,980		554,836
Purchases of premises and equipment		(12,369)		(4,495)
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities		493,669		(836,935)

Financing activities
Net (decrease) increase in deposits		(525,642)		934,392
Redemption of senior debt		(3,273)		—
Proceeds from the issuance of common stock		105		162
Repurchases of common stock and excise tax		(74,999)		(44,999)
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities		(603,809)		889,555

Net increase in cash and cash equivalents		15,225		120,928

Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period		888,189		601,784

Cash and cash equivalents, end of period	$	903,414	$	722,712

Supplemental disclosure:
Interest paid	$	117,473	$	30,079
Taxes paid	$	67,985	$	30,168
Non-cash investing and financing activities
Transfer of loans from discontinued operations	$	—	$	61,580
Transfer of real estate owned from discontinued operations	$	—	$	17,343
Leased vehicles transferred to repossessed assets	$	7,009	$	830

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated ~~statements.~~statements.

‎

~~THE BANCORP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES~~

~~UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY~~

For the nine months ended September 30, 2017
(in thousands, except share data)

Retained

Accumulated

Common

Additional

earnings/

other

stock

Common

Treasury

paid-in

(accumulated

comprehensive

shares

stock

stock

capital

deficit)

income (loss)

Total

Balance at January 1, 2017

55,419,204

$        55,419

$        (866)

$      360,564

$      (111,941)

$              (4,213)

$          298,963
Net income

-

-

-

-

34,108

-

34,108
Common stock issuance expense

-

-

-

(200)

-

-

(200)
Common stock issued from restricted shares,

net of tax benefits

440,456

441

-

(424)

(17)

-

-
Stock-based compensation

-

-

-

2,400

-

-

2,400
Other comprehensive income net of

reclassification adjustments and tax

-

-

-

-

-

4,190

4,190

Balance at September 30, 2017

55,859,660

$        55,860

$        (866)

$      362,340

$        (77,850)

$                   (23)

$          339,461

~~The accompanying notes are an integral part of this consolidated statement.~~

~~THE BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES~~

~~UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS~~

For the nine months

ended September 30,

2017

2016

(in thousands)
Operating activities

Net income (loss) from continuing operations

$            30,670

$          (29,811)
Net income (loss) from discontinued operations

3,438

(37,909)
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash

provided by operating activities

Depreciation and amortization

4,538

4,783
Provision for loan and lease losses

2,150

1,810
Net amortization of investment securities discounts/premiums

6,955

6,066
Stock-based compensation expense

2,400

1,990
Loans originated for sale

(398,410)

(372,065)
Sale of loans originated for resale

453,976

299,855
Gain on sales of loans originated for resale

(13,119)

(809)
Loss (gain) on sale of fixed assets

28

(21)
Loss on sale of other real estate owned

19

-
Fair value adjustment on investment in unconsolidated entity

(20)

14,753
Gain on sales of investment securities

(1,595)

(3,131)
Decrease (increase) in accrued interest receivable

458

(1,025)
Decrease (increase) in other assets

872

(19,290)
Decrease (increase) in discontinued assets held for sale

1,123

(5,779)
Increase (decrease) in other liabilities

(18,794)

10,505
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities

74,689

(130,078)

Investing activities

Purchase of investment securities available-for-sale

(237,870)

(499,969)
Proceeds from sale of investment securities available-for-sale

83,918

115,637
Proceeds from redemptions and prepayments of securities held-to-maturity

7,000

51
Proceeds from redemptions and prepayments of securities available-for-sale

234,163

133,212
Proceeds from sale of other real estate owned

85

-
Net increase in loans

(152,484)

(120,312)
Net decrease in discontinued loans held for sale

44,594

203,533
Proceeds from sale of fixed assets

366

341
Purchases of premises and equipment

(625)

(4,237)
Investment in unconsolidated entity

19,239

6,371
Net cash used in investing activities

(1,614)

(165,373)

Financing activities

Net decrease in deposits

(672,909)

(647,822)
Net decrease in securities sold under agreements to repurchase

(94)

(572)
Proceeds of short-term borrowings and federal funds purchased

-

70,000
Common stock issuance expense

(200)

-
Proceeds from the issuance of common stock

-

74,812
Net cash used in financing activities

(673,203)

(503,582)

Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents

(600,128)

(799,033)

Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period

999,059

1,155,162

Cash and cash equivalents, end of period

$          398,931

$          356,129

Supplemental disclosure:

Interest paid

$            11,176

$              9,514
Taxes paid

$              1,051

$                 366

~~The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated statements.~~

THE BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO UNAUDITED ~~CONSOLDIATED~~CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Note 1. ~~Structure~~Organization and Nature of ~~Company~~Operations

The Bancorp, Inc. ~~(the Company)~~(“the Company”) is a Delaware corporation and a registered financial holding company. Its primary, wholly-owned subsidiary is The Bancorp Bank, ~~(the Bank) which is wholly owned by~~ National Association (“the ~~Company.~~Bank”). The Bank is a ~~Delaware~~nationally chartered commercial bank located in ~~Wilmington, Delaware~~Sioux Falls, South Dakota and is a Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation ~~(FDIC)~~(“FDIC”) insured institution. InAs a nationally chartered institution, its ~~continuing operations,~~primary regulator is the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (“OCC”). The Bank has ~~four~~two primary lines of business consisting of its national specialty ~~lending:~~finance segment and its payments segment.

In the national specialty finance segment, the Bank makes the following types of loans: securities-backed lines of credit ~~(SBLOC)~~(“SBLOC”) and cash value of insurance-backed lines of credit (“IBLOC”), ~~leasing,~~leases (direct lease financing), Small Business Administration ~~(SBA)~~(“SBA”) loans and non-SBA commercial real estate bridge loans ~~generated for sale into capital markets primarily through commercial loan securitizations (CMBS)~~(“REBL”). ~~Through~~

While the ~~Bank,~~national specialty finance segment generates the majority of the Company’s revenues, the payments segment also contributes significant revenues. In its payments segment, the Company ~~also~~ provides ~~banking~~payment and deposit services nationally, which include prepaid ~~cards,~~and debit card accounts, private label banking, ~~institutional banking,~~deposit accounts to investment advisors’ customers, card payment and other payment ~~processing.~~ processing services. Payments segment deposits fund the majority of the Company’s loans and securities and may result in lower costs than other funding sources. Most of the payments segment’s revenues and deposits, and SBLOC and IBLOC loans, result from relationships with third parties which market such products. Concentrations of loans and deposits are based upon the cumulative account balances generated by those third parties. Similar concentrations result in revenues in prepaid, debit card and related fees. These concentrations may also be reflected in a lower cost of funds compared to other funding sources. The Company sweeps certain deposits off its balance sheet to other institutions through intermediaries. Such sweeps are utilized to optimize diversity within its funding structure by managing the percentage of individual client deposits to total deposits.

The Company and the Bank are subject to regulation by certain state and federal agencies and, accordingly, they are examined periodically by those regulatory authorities. As a consequence of the extensive regulation of commercial banking activities, the Company’s and the Bank’s businesses may be affected by state and federal legislation and regulations.

Note 2. Significant Accounting Policies

Basis of Presentation

The financial statements of the Company, as of September 30, ~~2017~~2023 and for the three and nine month periods ended September 30, ~~2017~~2023 and ~~2016,~~2022, are unaudited. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America ~~(U.S. GAAP)~~(“U.S. GAAP”) have been condensed or omitted in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange ~~Commission.~~Commission (the “SEC”). However, in the opinion of management, these interim financial statements include all necessary adjustments to fairly present the results of the interim periods presented. The unaudited interim consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited financial statements included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, ~~2016 (2016~~2022 (the “2022 Form ~~10-K Report)~~10-K”). The results of operations for the nine month period ended September 30, ~~2017~~2023 may not necessarily be indicative of the results of operations for the full year ending December 31, ~~2017.~~ 2023.

There have been no significant changes to the Company’s significant accounting policies as described in the 2022 Form 10-K.

The Company’s non-SBA commercial real estate bridge loans, at fair value, are primarily collateralized by multi-family properties (apartment buildings), and to a lesser extent, by hotel and retail properties. These loans were originally generated for sale through securitizations. In 2020, the Company decided to retain these loans on its balance sheet as interest-earning assets and resumed originating such loans in 2021. These new originations are identified as REBL and are held for investment in the loan portfolio. Prior originations initially intended for securitizations continue to be accounted for at fair value, and are included in the balance sheet in “Commercial loans, at fair value.”

Note 3. Stock-based Compensation

The Company recognizes compensation expense for stock options in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board ~~(FASB)~~ (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification ~~(ASC)~~ 718 ~~“Stock~~Stock Based ~~Compensation”~~Compensation (“ASC 718”). The expense of the option is generally measured at fair value at the grant date with compensation expense recognized over the service period, which is typically the vesting period. For grants subject to a service condition, the Company utilizes the Black-Scholes option-pricing model to estimate the fair value of each option on the date of grant. The Black-Scholes model takes into consideration the exercise price and expected life of the options, the

current price of the underlying stock and its expected volatility, the expected dividends on the stock and the current risk-free interest rate for the expected life of the option. The Company’s estimate of the fair value of a stock option is based on expectations derived from historical experience and may not necessarily equate to its market value when fully vested. In accordance with ASC 718, the Company estimates the number of options for which the requisite service is expected to be rendered. At September 30, ~~2017,~~2023, the Company had two active stock-based compensation ~~plans, which are more fully described in its 2016 Form 10-K Report.~~ plans.

~~The Company did not grant stock options during~~During the nine ~~month period~~months ended September 30, ~~2017. The~~2023, the Company granted ~~300,000~~57,573 stock options with a vesting period of four years inand a weighted average grant-date fair value of $17.37. During the ~~first~~ nine months ended September 30, 2022, the Company granted 100,000 stock options with a vesting period of ~~2016.~~four years and a weighted average grant-date fair value of $14.01. There were ~~28,500~~13,158 common stock options exercised in the nine month ~~periods~~period ended September 30, ~~2017, and no~~2023.There were 35,318 common stock options ~~were~~ exercised ~~during~~in the nine month period ended September 30, ~~2016.~~ 2022.

A summary of the ~~status of the~~ Company’s ~~equity compensation plans~~stock options is presented below.



								Weighted average
								remaining
			Weighted average			Weighted average		contractual	Aggregate
			remaining		Options	exercise price		term (years)	intrinsic value
		Weighted average	contractual	Aggregate
	Shares	exercise price	term (years)	intrinsic value
Outstanding at January 1, 2017	2,021,625	$ 8.32	5.24	$ -
Outstanding at January 1, 2023					580,104	$	13.25	7.48	$	8,968,660
Granted	-	-	-	-	57,573		35.17	9.37		—
Exercised	(28,500)	7.36	-	-	(13,158)		10.45	—		278,450
Expired	(1,000)	25.43	-	-	—		—	—		—
Forfeited	(38,750)	8.37	-	-	(1,842)		—	—		—
Outstanding at September 30, 2017	1,953,375	$ 8.31	4.51	$ 941,090
Exercisable at September 30, 2017	1,705,875	$ 8.50	3.93	$ 599,090
Outstanding at September 30, 2023					622,677	$	15.35	7.15	$	11,964,147
Exercisable at September 30, 2023					365,104	$	10.41	6.63	$	8,793,897

The Company granted ~~955,024~~547,556 restricted stock units ~~(RSUs)~~(“RSUs”) in the first nine months of ~~2017~~2023, of which ~~820,024~~514,785 have a vesting period of three years and ~~135,000~~32,771 have a vesting period of one ~~year.~~ year. At issuance, ~~for~~ the 547,556 RSUs granted in the first nine months of ~~2017: 799,559~~2023 had a weighted average fair value of ~~$5.06, 7,923 had a fair value of $6.31 and 147,542 had a fair value of $7.65. In~~$35.00 per unit. During the ~~first~~ nine months ~~of 2016, the~~ended September 30, 2022, the Company granted ~~789,000 restricted~~260,693 RSUs, of which ~~620,000 had~~219,311 have a vesting period of three years and ~~169,000 had~~41,382 have a vesting period of one year. OfAt issuance, the 260,693 RSUs granted in the first nine months of ~~2016, 489,000~~2022 had a weighted average fair value of ~~$4.50 and 300,000 had a fair value of $6.75 at issuance. The total fair value of RSUs vested for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 was $2.6 million and $830,000, respectively.~~$28.61 per unit.

A summary ~~of the status~~ of the Company’s RSUs is presented below.



		Weighted average	Average remaining		Weighted average		Average remaining
		grant date	contractual		grant date		contractual
	Shares	fair value	term (years)	RSUs	fair value		term (years)
Outstanding at January 1, 2017	831,775	$ 5.77	1.62
Outstanding at January 1, 2023				671,696	$	17.78	1.00
Granted	955,024	5.47		547,556		35.00	2.26
Vested	(438,441)	5.89		(456,991)		13.80	—
Forfeited	(83,904)	5.93		(2,511)		32.64	—
Outstanding at September 30, 2017	1,264,454	$ 5.49	1.92
Outstanding at September 30, 2023				759,750	$	32.54	1.91

As of September 30, ~~2017,~~2023, there was a total of ~~$5.9~~$19.4 million of unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested awards under ~~share-based~~stock-based compensation plans. This cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of approximately ~~2.0~~1.5 years. Related compensation expense for the three months ended September 30, 2023 and 2022 was $2.8 million and $2.1 million, respectively. Related compensation expense for the nine months ended September 30, ~~2017~~ 2023 and ~~2016~~2022 was ~~$2.4~~$8.7 million and ~~$2.0~~$5.6 million, respectively. The total issuance date fair value of RSUs vested and options exercised during the nine months ended September 30, 2023 and 2022 was $6.4 million and $6.0 million, respectively. The total intrinsic value of the options exercised and RSUs vested in those respective periods was $16.8 million and $14.7 million, respectively.

For the periods ended September 30, 2023 and 2022, the Company estimated the fair value of each stock option grant on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes options pricing model with the following weighted average assumptions:



	September 30,
	2023	2022
Risk-free interest rate	3.67%	1.94%
Expected dividend yield	—	—
Expected volatility	45.21%	45.10%
Expected lives (years)	6.3	6.3

Expected volatility is based on the historical volatility of the Company’s stock and peer group comparisons over the expected life of the option. The risk-free rate for periods within the expected life of the option is based on the U.S. Treasury strip rate in effect at the time of the grant. The life of the option is based on historical factors which include the contractual term, vesting period, exercise behavior and employee terminations. In accordance with ASC 718, stock based compensation expense for the period ended September 30, 2023

is based on awards that are ultimately expected to vest and has been reduced for estimated forfeitures. The Company estimates forfeitures using historical data or acceptable expedients.

Note 4. Earnings Per Share

The Company calculates earnings per share ~~under~~in accordance with ASC 260, ~~“Earnings~~Earnings Per ~~Share”~~Share. Basic earnings per share ~~exclude~~excludes dilution and ~~are~~is computed by dividing income available to common shareholders by the weighted average common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per share takes into account the potential dilution that could occur if securities, including stock options and RSUs or other contracts to issue common stock were exercised and converted into common stock. Stock options are dilutive if their exercise prices are less than the current stock price. RSUs are dilutive because they represent grants over vesting periods which do not require employees to pay exercise prices. The dilution shown in the tables below includes the potential dilution from both stock options and RSUs.

The following tables show the Company’s earnings per share for the periods presented:



	For the three months ended			For the three months ended
	September 30, 2017			September 30, 2023
	Income	Shares	Per share	Income		Shares		Per share
	(numerator)	(denominator)	amount	(numerator)		(denominator)		amount
					(Dollars in thousands except share and per share data)
	(dollars in thousands except share and per share data)
Basic earnings per share from continuing operations
Basic earnings per share
Net earnings available to common shareholders	$ 6,770	55,758,433	$ 0.12	$	50,137		54,175,184	$	0.93
Effect of dilutive securities
Common stock options	-	554,405	-
Common stock options and RSUs					—		563,426		(0.01)
Diluted earnings per share
Net earnings available to common shareholders	$ 6,770	56,312,838	$ 0.12	$	50,137		54,738,610	$	0.92

For the three months ended

September 30, 2017

Income

Shares

Per share

(numerator)

(denominator)

amount

(dollars in thousands except share and per share data)
Basic earnings per share from discontinued operations

Net earnings available to common shareholders

$                    511

55,758,433

$                  0.01
Effect of dilutive securities

Common stock options

-

554,405

-
Diluted earnings per share

Net earnings available to common shareholders

$                    511

56,312,838

$                  0.01

For the three months ended

September 30, 2017

Income

Shares

Per share

(numerator)

(denominator)

amount

��

(dollars in thousands except share and per share data)
Basic earnings per share

Net earnings available to common shareholders

$                 7,281

55,758,433

$                  0.13
Effect of dilutive securities

Common stock options

-

554,405

-
Diluted earnings per share

Net earnings available to common shareholders

$                 7,281

56,312,838

$                  0.13

Stock options for ~~1,633,375~~465,104 shares, exercisable at prices between ~~$6.75~~$6.87 and $18.81 per share, were outstanding at September 30, 2023, and included in the diluted earnings per share computation because the exercise price per share was less than the average market price. Stock options for 157,573 shares were anti-dilutive and not included in the earnings per share calculation.



	For the nine months ended
	September 30, 2023
	Income		Shares		Per share
	(numerator)		(denominator)		amount
		(Dollars in thousands except share and per share data)
Basic earnings per share
Net earnings available to common shareholders	$	148,268		54,828,547	$	2.70
Effect of dilutive securities
Common stock options and RSUs		—		507,807		(0.02)
Diluted earnings per share
Net earnings available to common shareholders	$	148,268		55,336,354	$	2.68

Stock options for 465,104 shares, exercisable at prices between $6.87 and $18.81 per share, were outstanding at September 30, 2023, and included in the diluted earnings per share computation because the exercise price per share was less than the average market price. Stock options for 157,573 shares were anti-dilutive and not included in the earnings per share calculation.



	For the three months ended
	September 30, 2022
	Income		Shares		Per share
	(numerator)		(denominator)		amount
		(Dollars in thousands except share and per share data)
Basic earnings per share
Net earnings available to common shareholders	$	30,604		56,429,425	$	0.54
Effect of dilutive securities
Common stock options and RSUs		—		578,799		—
Diluted earnings per share
Net earnings available to common shareholders	$	30,604		57,008,224	$	0.54

Stock options for 407,604 shares, exercisable at prices between $6.87 and $10.45 per share, were outstanding at September 30, ~~2017, but were not~~2022, and included in the ~~dilutive shares~~diluted earnings per share computation because the exercise price per share was ~~greater~~less than the average market price.

For the nine months ended

September 30, 2017

Income

Shares

Per share

(numerator)

(denominator)

amount

(dollars in thousands except share and per share data)
Basic earnings per share from continuing operations

Net earnings available to common shareholders

$               30,670

55,661,538

$                  0.55
Effect of dilutive securities

Common stock options

-

382,371

-
Diluted earnings per share

Net earnings available to common shareholders

$               30,670

56,043,909

$                  0.55

For the nine months ended

September 30, 2017

Income

Shares

Per share

(numerator)

(denominator)

amount

(dollars in thousands except share and per share data)
Basic earnings per share from discontinued operations

Net earnings available to common shareholders

$                 3,438

55,661,538

$                  0.06
Effect of dilutive securities

Common stock options

-

382,371

-
Diluted earnings per share

Net earnings available to common shareholders

$                 3,438

56,043,909

$                  0.06

For the nine months ended

September 30, 2017

Income

Shares

Per share

(numerator)

(denominator)

amount

(dollars in thousands except share and per share data)
Basic earnings per share

Net earnings available to common shareholders

$               34,108

55,661,538

$                  0.61
Effect of dilutive securities

Common stock options

-

382,371

-
Diluted earnings per share

Net earnings available to common shareholders

$               34,108

56,043,909

$                  0.61

Stock options for ~~1,953,375~~200,000 shares were anti-dilutive and not included in the earnings per share calculation.



	For the nine months ended
	September 30, 2022
	Income		Shares		Per share
	(numerator)		(denominator)		amount
		(Dollars in thousands except share and per share data)
Basic earnings per share
Net earnings available to common shareholders	$	89,972		56,782,524	$	1.58
Effect of dilutive securities
Common stock options and RSUs		—		728,462		(0.02)
Diluted earnings per share
Net earnings available to common shareholders	$	89,972		57,510,986	$	1.56

Stock options for 407,604 shares, exercisable at prices between ~~$6.75~~$6.87 and $10.45 per share, were outstanding at September 30, ~~2017, but were not~~2022, and included in the ~~dilutive shares~~diluted earnings per share computation because the exercise price per share was ~~greater~~less than the average market price.

For the three months ended

September 30, 2016

Income

Shares

Per share

(numerator)

(denominator)

amount

(dollars in thousands except share and per share data)
Basic loss per share from continuing operations

Net loss available to common shareholders

$               (1,530)

47,153,658

$                 (0.03)
Effect of dilutive securities

Common stock options

-

-

-
Diluted loss per share

Net loss available to common shareholders

$               (1,530)

47,153,658

$                 (0.03)

For the three months ended

September 30, 2016

Income

Shares

Per share

(numerator)

(denominator)

amount

(dollars in thousands except share and per share data)
Basic loss per share from discontinued operations

Net loss available to common shareholders

$             (24,021)

47,153,658

$                 (0.51)
Effect of dilutive securities

Common stock options

-

-

-
Diluted loss per share

Net loss available to common shareholders

$             (24,021)

47,153,658

$                 (0.51)

For the three months ended

September 30, 2016

Income

Shares

Per share

(numerator)

(denominator)

amount

(dollars in thousands except share and per share data)
Basic loss per share

Net loss available to common shareholders

$             (25,551)

47,153,658

$                 (0.54)
Effect of dilutive securities

Common stock options

-

-

-
Diluted loss per share

Net loss available to common shareholders

$             (25,551)

47,153,658

$                 (0.54)

Stock options for ~~2,036,500~~200,000 shares ~~exercisable at prices between $6.75~~were anti-dilutive and ~~$25.43 per share, were outstanding at September 30, 2016 but were~~ not included in ~~dilutive shares because~~ the ~~Company had a net loss available to common shareholders.~~

For the nine months ended

September 30, 2016

Income

Shares

Per share

(numerator)

(denominator)

amount

(dollars in thousands except share and per share data)
Basic loss per share from continuing operations

Net loss available to common shareholders

$             (29,811)

40,957,247

$                 (0.73)
Effect of dilutive securities

Common stock options

-

-

-
Diluted loss per share

Net loss available to common shareholders

$             (29,811)

40,957,247

$                 (0.73)

For the nine months ended

September 30, 2016

Income

Shares

Per share

(numerator)

(denominator)

amount

(dollars in thousands except share and per share data)
Basic loss per share from discontinued operations

Net loss available to common shareholders

$             (37,909)

40,957,247

$                 (0.92)
Effect of dilutive securities

Common stock options

-

-

-
Diluted loss per share

Net loss available to common shareholders

$             (37,909)

40,957,247

$                 (0.92)

For the nine months ended

September 30, 2016

Income

Shares

Per share

(numerator)

(denominator)

amount

(dollars in thousands except share and per share data)
Basic loss per share

Net loss available to common shareholders

$             (67,720)

40,957,247

$                 (1.65)
Effect of dilutive securities

Common stock options

-

-

-
Diluted loss per share

Net loss available to common shareholders

$             (67,720)

40,957,247

$                 (1.65)

~~Stock options for 2,036,500 shares exercisable at prices between $6.75 and $25.43~~earnings per share ~~were outstanding at September 30, 2016 but were not included in dilutive shares because the Company had a net loss available to common shareholders.~~calculation.

Note 5. Investment Securities

The amortized cost, gross unrealized gains and losses, and fair values of the Company’s investment securities classified as available-for-sale ~~and held-to-maturity~~ at September 30, ~~2017~~2023 and December 31, ~~2016~~2022 are summarized as follows (in thousands):



Available-for-sale	September 30, 2017				September 30, 2023
		Gross	Gross				Gross		Gross
	Amortized	unrealized	unrealized	Fair	Amortized		unrealized		unrealized		Fair
	cost	gains	losses	value	cost		gains		losses		value
U.S. Government agency securities	$ 35,162	$ 87	$ (24)	$ 35,225	$	35,698	$	6	$	(2,677)	$	33,027
Asset-backed securities *	264,196	1,182	(439)	264,939
Asset-backed securities⁽¹⁾						334,517		—		(3,019)		331,498
Tax-exempt obligations of states and political subdivisions	13,157	179	(17)	13,319		4,860		—		(227)		4,633
Taxable obligations of states and political subdivisions	71,592	1,671	(150)	73,113		43,351		10		(1,644)		41,717
Residential mortgage-backed securities	367,017	840	(3,420)	364,437		175,122		85		(15,166)		160,041
Collateralized mortgage obligation securities	129,722	294	(923)	129,093		37,709		—		(2,117)		35,592
Commercial mortgage-backed securities	153,274	488	(114)	153,648		158,810		—		(14,962)		143,848
Foreign debt securities	59,685	398	(88)	59,995
Corporate debt securities	102,205	1,047	(65)	103,187		10,000		—		(3,720)		6,280
	$ 1,196,010	$ 6,186	$ (5,240)	$ 1,196,956	$	800,067	$	101	$	(43,532)	$	756,636


	September 30, 2017				September 30, 2023
		Gross	Gross				Gross		Gross
	Amortized	unrealized	unrealized	Fair	Amortized		unrealized		unrealized		Fair
* Asset-backed securities as shown above	cost	gains	losses	value
⁽¹⁾Asset-backed securities as shown above					cost		gains		losses		value
Federally insured student loan securities	$ 94,409	$ 254	$ (418)	$ 94,245	$	6,581	$	—	$	(53)	$	6,528
Collateralized loan obligation securities	153,369	800	(19)	154,150		327,936		—		(2,966)		324,970
Other	16,418	128	(2)	16,544
	$ 264,196	$ 1,182	$ (439)	$ 264,939	$	334,517	$	—	$	(3,019)	$	331,498

Held-to-maturity

September 30, 2017

Gross

Gross

Amortized

unrealized

unrealized

Fair

cost

gains

losses

value
Other debt securities - single issuers

$               11,017

$                  118

$             (2,761)

$                8,374
Other debt securities - pooled

75,385

1,340

-

76,725

$               86,402

$               1,458

$             (2,761)

$              85,099



Available-for-sale	December 31, 2022
			Gross		Gross
	Amortized		unrealized		unrealized		Fair
	cost		gains		losses		value
U.S. Government agency securities	$	29,859	$	17	$	(1,495)	$	28,381
Asset-backed securities⁽¹⁾		343,885		—		(9,876)		334,009
Tax-exempt obligations of states and political subdivisions		3,560		—		(61)		3,499
Taxable obligations of states and political subdivisions		45,668		52		(1,709)		44,011
Residential mortgage-backed securities		150,135		148		(10,463)		139,820
Collateralized mortgage obligation securities		43,858		—		(2,075)		41,783
Commercial mortgage-backed securities		179,977		—		(13,164)		166,813
Corporate debt securities		10,000		—		(2,300)		7,700
	$	806,942	$	217	$	(41,143)	$	766,016


	December 31, 2022
			Gross		Gross
	Amortized		unrealized		unrealized		Fair
⁽¹⁾Asset-backed securities as shown above	cost		gains		losses		value
Federally insured student loan securities	$	8,488	$	—	$	(144)	$	8,344
Collateralized loan obligation securities		335,397		—		(9,732)		325,665
	$	343,885	$	—	$	(9,876)	$	334,009

Available-for-sale

December 31, 2016

Gross

Gross

Amortized

unrealized

unrealized

Fair

cost

gains

losses

value
U.S. Government agency securities

$               27,771

$                    23

$                  (92)

$              27,702
Asset-backed securities *

355,622

1,811

(2,037)

355,396
Tax-exempt obligations of states and political subdivisions

15,492

129

(137)

15,484
Taxable obligations of states and political subdivisions

78,143

1,539

(633)

79,049
Residential mortgage-backed securities

347,120

598

(5,149)

342,569
Collateralized mortgage obligation securities

160,649

619

(1,445)

159,823
Commercial mortgage-backed securities

117,844

250

(1,008)

117,086
Foreign debt securities

56,603

168

(274)

56,497
Corporate debt securities

95,005

421

(418)

95,008

$          1,254,249

$               5,558

$           (11,193)

$         1,248,614

December 31, 2016

Gross

Gross

Amortized

unrealized

unrealized

Fair
* Asset-backed securities as shown above

cost

gains

losses

value
Federally insured student loan securities

$              122,579

$                  346

$             (2,000)

$            120,925
Collateralized loan obligation securities

215,117

1,294

(14)

216,397
Other

17,926

171

(23)

18,074

$              355,622

$               1,811

$             (2,037)

$            355,396

Held-to-maturity

December 31, 2016

Gross

Gross

Amortized

unrealized

unrealized

Fair

cost

gains

losses

value
Other debt securities - single issuers

$               17,983

$                  179

$             (3,026)

$              15,136
Other debt securities - pooled

75,484

1,179

-

76,663

$               93,467

$               1,358

$             (3,026)

$              91,799

Investments in Federal Home Loan ~~and~~Bank (“FHLB”) stock, Atlantic Central Bankers Bank (“ACBB”) stock, and Federal Reserve Bank stock are recorded at cost and amounted to ~~$991,000 and $1.6~~$20.2 million ~~respectively,~~ at September 30, ~~2017~~2023 and $12.6 million at December 31, ~~2016.~~2022. At each of those dates, ACBB stock amounted to $40,000. The Bank’s conversion to a national charter required the purchase of $11.0 million of

Federal Reserve Bank stock in September 2022. The amount of FHLB stock required to be held is based on the amount of borrowings, and after repayment thereof, the stock may be redeemed.

The amortized cost and fair value of the Company’s investment securities at September 30, ~~2017,~~2023, by contractual maturity, are shown below (in thousands). Expected maturities may differ from contractual maturities because borrowers have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without call or prepayment penalties.



	Available-for-sale		Held-to-maturity		Available-for-sale
	Amortized	Fair	Amortized	Fair	Amortized		Fair
	cost	value	cost	value	cost		value
Due before one year	$ 6,433	$ 6,441	$ -	$ -	$	24,466	$	23,993
Due after one year through five years	170,145	171,473	-	-		132,922		126,149
Due after five years through ten years	361,549	362,268	-	-		297,513		287,643
Due after ten years	657,883	656,774	86,402	85,099		345,166		318,851
	$ 1,196,010	$ 1,196,956	$ 86,402	$ 85,099	$	800,067	$	756,636

At September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, there were no investment securities pledged for securities sold under repurchase agreements as required or permitted by law. At September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, investment securities with a fair value of approximately $606.8 million and $607.2 million, respectively, were pledgedIn 2020, the Company began pledging loans to ~~secure a~~collateralize its line of credit with the ~~FHLB.~~FHLB, as described in “Note 6. Loans.” The Company had no securities pledged against that line at September 30, 2023 and December 31, 2022. There were no gross realized gains on sales of securities for the nine months ended September 30, 2023 and the year ended December 31, 2022. Realized losses on securities sales were $4,000 and $6,000, respectively, for the nine months ended September 30, 2023 and the year ended December 31, 2022.

Fair ~~value~~values of available-for-sale securities are based on the fair market ~~value~~values supplied by a third-party market data provider, ~~while the~~or where such third-party market data is not available, fair ~~value of held-to-maturity securities~~values are based on ~~the present value of cash flows, which discounts expected cash flows from principal~~

and interest using yield to maturity at the measurement date. The Company periodically reviews its investment portfolio to determine whether unrealized losses are other than temporary, based on an evaluation of the creditworthiness of the issuers/guarantors as well as the underlying collateral, if applicable, in addition to the continuing performance of the securities. The amount of the credit impairment is calculated by estimating the discounted cash ~~flows for those securities.~~flows. The ~~Company did not recognize any other-than-temporary impairment charges in the first nine months of 2017.~~ third-party market data provider uses a pricing matrix which it creates daily, taking into consideration actual trade data, projected prepayments, and when relevant, projected credit defaults and losses.

The table below indicates the length of time individual securities had been in a continuous unrealized loss position at September 30, ~~2017~~2023 (dollars in thousands):



Available-for-sale		Less than 12 months		12 months or longer		Total			Less than 12 months				12 months or longer				Total
	Number of securities	Fair Value	Unrealized losses	Fair Value	Unrealized losses	Fair Value	Unrealized losses	Number of securities		Fair Value		Unrealized losses		Fair Value		Unrealized losses		Fair Value		Unrealized losses
Description of Securities
U.S. Government agency securities	4	$ 17,266	$ (24)	$ -	$ -	$ 17,266	$ (24)	15	$	14,220	$	(1,007)	$	17,551	$	(1,670)	$	31,771	$	(2,677)
Asset-backed securities	16	16,453	(20)	58,961	(419)	75,414	(439)	55		—		—		331,498		(3,019)		331,498		(3,019)
Tax-exempt obligations of states and
political subdivisions	2	-	-	2,148	(17)	2,148	(17)	6		2,831		(134)		1,802		(93)		4,633		(227)
Taxable obligations of states and
political subdivisions	14	14,844	(127)	977	(23)	15,821	(150)	25		—		—		38,957		(1,644)		38,957		(1,644)
Residential mortgage-backed securities	93	173,175	(1,573)	98,021	(1,847)	271,196	(3,420)	138		34,735		(2,888)		116,171		(12,278)		150,906		(15,166)
Collateralized mortgage obligation securities	26	62,244	(468)	30,937	(455)	93,181	(923)	21		—		—		35,592		(2,117)		35,592		(2,117)
Commercial mortgage-backed securities	8	23,434	(114)	243	-	23,677	(114)	40		—		—		143,848		(14,962)		143,848		(14,962)
Foreign debt securities	21	15,869	(68)	1,180	(20)	17,049	(88)
Corporate debt securities	20	11,658	(30)	4,514	(35)	16,172	(65)	1		—		—		6,280		(3,720)		6,280		(3,720)
Total temporarily impaired
Total unrealized loss position
investment securities	204	$ 334,943	$ (2,424)	$ 196,981	$ (2,816)	$ 531,924	$ (5,240)	301	$	51,786	$	(4,029)	$	691,699	$	(39,503)	$	743,485	$	(43,532)

Held-to-maturity

Less than 12 months

12 months or longer

Total

Number of securities

Fair Value

Unrealized losses

Fair Value

Unrealized losses

Fair Value

Unrealized losses
Description of Securities

Corporate and other debt securities:

Single issuers

1

$                      -

$                      -

$                6,343

$             (2,761)

$                  6,343

$             (2,761)
Total temporarily impaired

    investment securities

1

$                      -

$                      -

$                6,343

$             (2,761)

$                  6,343

$             (2,761)

The table below indicates the length of time individual securities had been in a continuous unrealized loss position at December 31, ~~2016~~2022 (dollars in thousands):



Available-for-sale		Less than 12 months		12 months or longer		Total			Less than 12 months				12 months or longer				Total
	Number of securities	Fair Value	Unrealized losses	Fair Value	Unrealized losses	Fair Value	Unrealized losses	Number of securities		Fair Value		Unrealized losses		Fair Value		Unrealized losses		Fair Value		Unrealized losses
Description of Securities
U.S. Government agency securities	5	$ 7,414	$ (36)	$ 7,824	$ (56)	$ 15,238	$ (92)	12	$	19,523	$	(1,461)	$	2,269	$	(34)	$	21,792	$	(1,495)
Asset-backed securities	23	10,186	(49)	93,375	(1,988)	103,561	(2,037)	55		125,938		(3,027)		208,071		(6,849)		334,009		(9,876)
Tax-exempt obligations of states and
political subdivisions	8	6,056	(118)	3,301	(19)	9,357	(137)	4		3,499		(61)		—		—		3,499		(61)
Taxable obligations of states and
political subdivisions	27	42,963	(633)	-	-	42,963	(633)	26		39,710		(1,709)		—		—		39,710		(1,709)
Residential mortgage-backed securities	68	180,357	(4,833)	54,254	(316)	234,611	(5,149)	135		101,685		(6,198)		28,843		(4,265)		130,528		(10,463)
Collateralized mortgage obligation securities	28	88,936	(1,004)	30,386	(441)	119,322	(1,445)	22		41,456		(2,057)		327		(18)		41,783		(2,075)
Commercial mortgage-backed securities	28	79,345	(963)	4,547	(45)	83,892	(1,008)	43		124,953		(7,683)		41,860		(5,481)		166,813		(13,164)
Foreign debt securities	34	26,696	(274)	700	-	27,396	(274)
Corporate debt securities	39	30,418	(414)	645	(4)	31,063	(418)	1		—		—		7,700		(2,300)		7,700		(2,300)
Total temporarily impaired
Total unrealized loss position
investment securities	260	$ 472,371	$ (8,324)	$ 195,032	$ (2,869)	$ 667,403	$ (11,193)	298	$	456,764	$	(22,196)	$	289,070	$	(18,947)	$	745,834	$	(41,143)

Held-to-maturity

Less than 12 months

12 months or longer

Total

Number of securities

Fair Value

Unrealized losses

Fair Value

Unrealized losses

Fair Value

Unrealized losses
Description of Securities

Corporate and other debt securities:

Single issuers

1

$                      -

$                      -

$                6,039

$             (3,026)

$                  6,039

$             (3,026)
Total temporarily impaired

    investment securities

1

$                      -

$                      -

$                6,039

$             (3,026)

$                  6,039

$             (3,026)

~~Other securities included~~The Company owns one single issuer trust preferred security, which was purchased in 2006. The security is not rated by any bond rating service. At September 30, 2023, this security had a book value of $10.0 million and a fair value of $6.3 million. This security is presented in the ~~held-to-maturity classification at September 30, 2017 consisted of three securities secured by diversified portfolios of~~ corporate ~~securities and two single-issuer trust preferred securities.~~

~~A total of $11.0 million of other~~ debt securities ~~- single issuers is comprised of~~classification in the ~~following: amortized cost of the two single-issuer trust preferred securities of $11.0 million, of which one~~tables above. The security ~~for $1.9 million was issued by a bank and one security for $9.1 million~~ was issued by an aggregator of insurance ~~company.~~

~~A total~~lines in run-off, including workmen’s compensation lines. In the third quarter of ~~$75.4 million~~2023, the Company was notified that interest payments were being deferred on the security, as permitted under the terms of ~~other debt securities – pooled is comprised~~the trust preferred indenture which permits such deferrals for up to twenty consecutive quarters. At the end of ~~three securities consisting~~the deferral, deferred interest must be repaid, including interest on the deferred interest. The Company has requested additional updated financial information from the aggregator to permit a more accurate valuation of ~~diversified portfolios of corporate securities.~~

~~The following table provides additional information related~~the security subsequent to the ~~Company’s single issuer trust preferred securities as~~interest deferral. The aggregator has indicated that it is attempting to identify all holders of ~~September 30, 2017 (in thousands):~~the security and that it intends to provide such financial information concurrently to all holders. The Company has placed the security in non-accrual status and will evaluate the security for potential loss in the fourth quarter of 2023, when the aggregator indicated that the financial information would be distributed. While the security has previously been subject to interest deferral which was repaid, there can be no assurance that repayment will occur for the current deferral. Further, depending upon the financial information provided by the aggregator, a loss of up to the full amount of principal, or $10.0 million, may be recognized in the fourth quarter of 2023. In 2023, $197,000 of accrued interest income was reversed on this security when it was placed in non-accrual status, and $210,000 of additional interest would have been earned had the security continued to accrue interest.

Single issuer

Book value

Fair value

Unrealized gain/(loss)

Credit rating
Security A

$                1,913

$                 2,031

$                    118

Not rated
Security B

9,104

6,343

(2,761)

Not rated

Class: All of the above are trust preferred securities.

The Company has evaluated the securities in the above tables as of September 30, 2023 and has concluded that none of these securities ~~has impairment~~required an allowance for credit losses (“ACL”). The Company previously evaluated the securities in the above tables as of December 31, 2022 and concluded that ~~is other-than-temporary.~~none of these securities required an ACL. The Company evaluates whether ~~a credit impairment exists~~an ACL is required by considering primarily the following factors: (a) the ~~length of time and~~ extent to which the fair value ~~has been~~is less than the amortized cost of the security, (b) changes in the financial condition, credit rating and near-term prospects of the issuer, (c) whether the issuer is current on contractually obligated interest and principal payments, (d) changes in the financial condition of the security’s underlying collateral and (e) the payment structure of the security. The Company’s determination of the best estimate of expected future cash flows, which is used to determine the credit loss amount, is a quantitative and qualitative process that incorporates information received from third-party sources along with internal assumptions and judgments regarding the future performance of the security. The Company concluded that ~~most of~~ the securities that are in an unrealized loss position are in a loss position because of changes in market interest rates after the securities were purchased. ~~Securities that have been in an unrealized loss position for 12 months or longer include other securities whose market values are sensitive to market interest rates.~~ The Company’s unrealized loss for ~~other~~corporate debt securities, ~~which include two~~resulted from one single issuer trust preferred ~~securities,~~security as described above, and is primarily related to general market conditions, including a lack of liquidity in the market. The severity of the ~~temporary impairments~~impact of fair value in relation to the carrying amounts of the individual investments is consistent with market developments. The Company’s analysis of each investment is performed at the security level. As a result of its review, the Company concluded that other-than-temporary impairment did not exist due to the Company’s ability and intention to hold these securities to recover their amortized cost basis.

Note 6. Loans

The Company has several lending lines of business ~~including~~including: small business loans (“SBLs”), comprised primarily of SBA ~~loans,~~loans; direct lease financing primarily for commercial vehicles and to a lesser extent equipment; SBLOC collateralized by marketable securities; IBLOC collateralized by the cash value of eligible life insurance policies; and ~~other specialty and consumer lending. The~~investment advisor financing for purposes of debt refinance, acquisition of another firm or internal succession. Prior to 2020, the Company also ~~originates~~originated commercial real estate bridge loans for sale into commercial mortgage backed securitizations or to secondary government guaranteed loan markets. These sales are accounted for as true sales and servicing rights on these loans are not retained. Thesecuritizations. At origination, the Company ~~has~~ elected fair value treatment for these loans as they were originally held-for-sale, to better reflect the economics of the transactions. In 2020, the Company decided to retain these loans on its balance sheet and currently intends to continue to do so. Therefore, these loans are no longer accounted for as held-for-sale, but the Company continues to present them at fair value. At September 30, ~~2017,~~2023, such loans comprised $253.1 million of the $379.6 million of commercial loans,

at fair value, with the balance comprised of the guaranteed portion of certain SBA loans also previously held for sale. The amortized cost of the $379.6 million commercial loans at fair value was $381.9 million. Included in “Net realized and unrealized gains (losses) on commercial loans, at fair value” in the consolidated statements of operations are changes in the estimated fair value of the loans held for sale was $383.0 million and their book value was $378.2 million. Included in the gain on sale of loans in the Statements of Operations were gains recognized from changes in fair value of $1.9 million forsuch loans. For the nine months ended September 30, ~~2017. There were no~~2023, related net unrealized losses recognized for changes in fair value ~~related~~were $1.7 million, $365,000 of which reflected losses attributable to credit ~~risk. Interest earned on~~weaknesses. For the nine months ended September 30, 2022, net unrealized losses recognized for such changes in fair value were $5.3 million, which reflected $6.4 million of loss attributable to credit weaknesses.In the third quarter of 2021, the Company resumed the origination of commercial real estate bridge loans which it also intends to hold for investment and which are accounted for at amortized cost. They are captioned as REBLs as they are transitional commercial mortgage loans which are made to improve and rehabilitate existing properties which already have cash flow.

The Bank has pledged the majority of its loans held for investment at amortized cost and commercial loans at fair value to either the FHLB or the Federal Reserve Bank for lines of credit with those institutions. The FHLB and FRB lines are periodically utilized to manage liquidity. The amount of loans pledged varies and the collateral may be unpledged at any time to the extent the collateral exceeds advances. The lines are maintained consistent with the Bank’s liquidity policy which maximizes potential liquidity. At September 30, 2023, $2.55 billion of loans were pledged to the Federal Reserve Bank and $1.10 billion of loans were pledged to the FHLB. There were no balances against these lines at September 30, 2023.

Prior to 2020, the Company sponsored the structuring of commercial mortgage loan securitizations, and in 2020, the Company decided not to pursue additional securitizations. The loans previously sold to the commercial mortgage-backed securitizations were transitional commercial mortgage loans made to improve and rehabilitate existing properties which already had cash flow. Servicing rights were not retained. Each of the securitizations is considered a variable interest entity of which the Company is not the primary beneficiary. Further, true sale ~~during~~accounting has been applicable to each of the ~~period held~~securitizations, as supported by a review performed by an independent third-party consultant. In each of the securitizations, the Company obtained a tranche of certificates which are accounted for as available-for-sale debt securities. The securities were recorded ~~in Interest Income-Loans, including fees,~~at fair value at acquisition, which was determined by an independent third-party based on the ~~Statements~~discounted cash flow method using unobservable (level 3) inputs.

Of the six securities purchased by the Bank from our securitizations, all have been repaid except one issued by CRE-2. As of ~~Operations.~~September 30, 2023, the principal balance of the Bank’s CRE-2-issued security was $12.6 million and it is subordinate to the repayment of a senior tranche with a remaining balance of $3.3 million. A total of $15.9 million plus trustee fees, late charges and unpaid interest is required to repay the Bank tranche. The collateral remaining to repay the $15.9 million consists of a suburban office building in New Jersey and a retail facility in Missouri, the combined most recent appraisals for which total $33.0 million. The excess of the $33.0 million appraised value over the $15.9 million provides repayment protection for the Bank-owned tranche. Efforts to resolve the New Jersey suburban office loan and stabilize the property have not been successful to date. A 2023 broker’s opinion of the property’s liquidation value was $20.9 million versus a loan balance of $24.5 million. Negotiations with the borrower continue, with no plan for immediate liquidation. The Missouri retail facility is held as real estate owned by the trust and is also not yet stabilized, and the special servicer expects to market the property for liquidation. The March 9, 2023 appraised value of the property was $12.1 million versus a loan balance of $16.3 million. Since borrowers are no longer making payments, accrued interest and the Bank’s remaining $12.6 million of principal are not expected to be repaid until collateral liquidation.

The Company analyzes credit risk prior to making loans on an individual loan basis. The Company considers relevant aspects of the

borrowers’ financial position and cash flow, past borrower performance, management’s knowledge of market conditions, collateral and the ratio of loan amounts to estimated collateral value in making its credit determinations.

Major classifications of loans, excluding commercial loans ~~held for sale,~~at fair value, are as follows (in thousands):

September 30,

December 31,

2017

2016

SBA non real estate
$                       72,055

$                       74,644
SBA commercial mortgage
132,997

126,159
SBA construction
14,205

8,826
SBA loans *
219,257

209,629
Direct lease financing
369,069

346,645
SBLOC
720,279

630,400
Other specialty lending
36,664

11,073
Other consumer loans
20,107

17,374

1,365,376

1,215,121
Unamortized loan fees and costs
8,684

7,790
Total loans, net of deferred loan fees and costs
$                  1,374,060

$                  1,222,911


	September 30,		December 31,
	2023		2022
SBL non-real estate	$	130,579	$	108,954
SBL commercial mortgage		547,107		474,496
SBL construction		19,204		30,864
SBLs		696,890		614,314
Direct lease financing		670,208		632,160
SBLOC / IBLOC⁽¹⁾		1,720,513		2,332,469
Advisor financing⁽²⁾		199,442		172,468
Real estate bridge loans		1,848,224		1,669,031
Other loans⁽³⁾		55,800		61,679
		5,191,077		5,482,121
Unamortized loan fees and costs		7,895		4,732
Total loans, including unamortized loan fees and costs	$	5,198,972	$	5,486,853

~~Included in~~


	September 30,		December 31,
	2023		2022
SBLs, including costs net of deferred fees of $8,900 and $7,327
for September 30, 2023 and December 31, 2022, respectively	$	705,790	$	621,641
SBLs included in commercial loans, at fair value		126,543		146,717
Total SBLs⁽⁴⁾	$	832,333	$	768,358

⁽¹⁾SBLOC are collateralized by marketable securities, while IBLOC are collateralized by the ~~table above~~cash surrender value of insurance policies. At September 30, 2023 and December 31, 2022, IBLOC loans amounted to $712.6 million and $1.12 billion, respectively.

⁽²⁾In 2020, the Bank began originating loans to investment advisors for purposes of debt refinancing, acquisition of another firm or internal succession. Maximum loan amounts are subject to loan-to-value ratios of 70% of the business enterprise value based on a third-party valuation, but may be increased depending upon the debt service coverage ratio. Personal guarantees and blanket business liens are obtained as appropriate.

⁽³⁾Includes demand deposit overdrafts reclassified as loan balances totaling ~~$7.1 million~~$215,000 and ~~$2.4~~$2.6 million at September 30, ~~2017~~2023 and December 31, ~~2016,~~2022, respectively. ~~Overdraft~~Estimated overdraft charge-offs and recoveries are reflected in the ~~allowance for loan~~ACL and ~~lease losses.~~are immaterial.

* ⁽⁴⁾The ~~following table shows SBA~~SBLs held at fair value are comprised of the government guaranteed portion of 7(a) Program (as defined below) loans ~~and SBA loans held for sale~~ at the dates ~~indicated (in thousands):~~indicated.

September 30,

December 31,

2017

2016

SBA loans, including deferred fees and costs
$                     225,909

$                     215,786
SBA loans included in held for sale
160,855

154,016
Total SBA loans
$                     386,764

$                     369,802

The following table provides information about ~~impaired~~ loans individually evaluated for credit loss at September 30, 2023and December 31, 2022 (in thousands). Legacy commercial real estate is comprised of commercial loans made by the Philadelphia commercial loan division which was discontinued.



	September 30, 2023
	Recorded ‎investment		Unpaid ‎principal ‎balance		Related ‎ACL		Average ‎recorded ‎investment		Interest ‎income ‎recognized
Without an ACL recorded
SBL non-real estate	$	419	$	1,895	$	—	$	344	$	—
SBL commercial mortgage		2,034		2,034		—		899		—
Direct lease financing		115		285		—		55		—
Legacy commercial real estate		—		—		—		2,664		—
Consumer - home equity		231		231		—		262		7
With an ACL recorded
SBL non-real estate		918		918		(566)		915		2
SBL commercial mortgage		911		911		(419)		1,732		—
SBL construction		3,385		3,385		(44)		3,385		—
Direct lease financing		3,236		3,236		(774)		2,612		—
IBLOC		475		475		(17)		119		—
Legacy commercial real estate and Other loans		3,688		3,688		(11)		1,336		—
Total
SBL non-real estate		1,337		2,813		(566)		1,259		2
SBL commercial mortgage		2,945		2,945		(419)		2,631		—
SBL construction		3,385		3,385		(44)		3,385		—
Direct lease financing		3,351		3,521		(774)		2,667		—
IBLOC		475		475		(17)		119		—
Legacy commercial real estate and Other loans		3,688		3,688		(11)		4,000		—
Consumer - home equity		231		231		—		262		7
	$	15,412	$	17,058	$	(1,831)	$	14,323	$	9



	December 31, 2022
	Recorded ‎investment		Unpaid ‎principal ‎balance		Related ‎ACL		Average ‎recorded ‎investment		Interest ‎income ‎recognized
Without an ACL recorded
SBL non-real estate	$	400	$	2,762	$	—	$	388	$	—
SBL commercial mortgage		—		—		—		45		—
Direct lease financing		—		—		—		52		—
Legacy commercial real estate		3,552		3,552		—		1,421		150
Consumer - home equity		295		295		—		306		9
With an ACL recorded
SBL non-real estate		974		974		(525)		1,237		7
SBL commercial mortgage		1,423		1,423		(441)		1,090		—
SBL construction		3,386		3,386		(153)		1,245		—
Direct lease financing		3,550		3,550		(933)		710		—
Other loans		692		692		(15)		1,923		—
Total
SBL non-real estate		1,374		3,736		(525)		1,625		7
SBL commercial mortgage		1,423		1,423		(441)		1,135		—
SBL construction		3,386		3,386		(153)		1,245		—
Direct lease financing		3,550		3,550		(933)		762		—
Legacy commercial real estate and Other loans		4,244		4,244		(15)		3,344		150
Consumer - home equity		295		295		—		306		9
	$	14,272	$	16,634	$	(2,067)	$	8,417	$	166

The loan review department recommendsnon-accrual status for loans to the surveillance committee, in those situations where interest income appears to be uncollectible or a protracted delay in collection becomes evident. The surveillance committee further vets and approves the non-accrual status.

The following table summarizes non-accrual loans with and without an ACL as of the periods indicated

(in thousands):


	September 30, 2023						December 31, 2022
	Non-accrual loans with a related ACL		Non-accrual loans without a related ACL		Total non-accrual loans		Total non-accrual loans
SBL non-real estate	$	837	$	419	$	1,256	$	1,249
SBL commercial mortgage		911		2,034		2,945		1,423
SBL construction		3,385		—		3,385		3,386
Direct leasing		3,236		115		3,351		3,550
IBLOC		475		—		475		—
Consumer - home equity		—		—		—		56
Legacy commercial real estate and Other loans		3,688		—		3,688		692
	$	12,532	$	2,568	$	15,100	$	10,356

The Company had $18.8 million of other real estate owned (“OREO”) at September 30, ~~2017~~2023 and $21.2 million of OREO at December 31, ~~2016 (in thousands):~~

Recorded
investment

Unpaid
principal
balance

Related
allowance

Average
recorded
investment

Interest
income
recognized
September 30, 2017

Without an allowance recorded

SBA non real estate
$                      357

$                      357

$                        -

$                      274

$                           -
SBA commercial mortgage
-

-

-

-

-
Direct lease financing
284

396

-

71

-
Consumer - other
-

-

-

-

-
Consumer - home equity
1,700

1,700

-

1,716

-
With an allowance recorded

-
SBA non real estate
2,288

2,288

1,659

2,534

-
SBA commercial mortgage
1,226

1,226

185

761

-
Direct lease financing
-

-

-

506

-
Consumer - other
-

-

-

18

-
Consumer - home equity
-

-

-

-

-
Total

SBA non real estate
2,645

2,645

1,659

2,808

-

SBA commercial mortgage
1,226

1,226

185

761

-
Direct lease financing
284

396

-

577

-
Consumer - other
-

-

-

18

-
Consumer - home equity
1,700

1,700

-

1,716

-

5,855

5,967

1,844

5,880

-

December 31, 2016

Without an allowance recorded

SBA non real estate
$                      191

$                      191

$                        -

$                      336

$                           -
Direct lease financing
-

-

-

-

-
Consumer - other
-

-

-

259

-
Consumer - home equity
1,730

1,730

-

1,187

-
With an allowance recorded

SBA non real estate
2,183

2,183

938

1,277

-
Direct lease financing
734

734

216

147

-
Consumer - other
-

-

-

-

-
Consumer - home equity
-

-

-

549

-
Total

SBA non real estate
2,374

2,374

938

1,613

-
Direct lease financing
734

734

216

147

-
Consumer - other
-

-

-

259

-
Consumer - home equity
1,730

1,730

-

1,736

-

4,838

4,838

1,154

3,755

-

2022. The following ~~tables summarize~~table summarizes the Company’s non-accrual loans, loans past due 90 days or more, and ~~still accruing and other real estate owned for the periods indicated (the Company had no non-accrual leases~~OREO at September 30, ~~2017 or~~2023 and December 31, ~~2016) (in~~2022, respectively:



	September 30,		December 31,
	2023		2022
	(Dollars in thousands)
Non-accrual loans
SBL non-real estate	$	1,256	$	1,249
SBL commercial mortgage		2,945		1,423
SBL construction		3,385		3,386
Direct leasing		3,351		3,550
IBLOC		475		—
Legacy commercial real estate and Other loans		3,688		692
Consumer - home equity		—		56
Total non-accrual loans		15,100		10,356

Loans past due 90 days or more and still accruing		677		7,775
Total non-performing loans		15,777		18,131
OREO		18,756		21,210
Total non-performing assets	$	34,533	$	39,341

Interest which would have been earned on loans classified as non-accrual for the nine months ended September 30, 2023 and 2022, was $621,000 and $133,000, respectively. No income on non-accrual loans was recognized during the nine months ended September 30, 2023. During the nine months ended September 30, 2023, $89,000 of legacy commercial real estate, $89,000 of SBL commercial real

estate, $10,000 of SBL non-real estate, $13,000 of IBLOC, and $71,000 of direct leasing were reversed from interest income, which represented interest accrued on loans placed into non-accrual status during the period. During the nine months ended September 30, 2022, $139,000 of SBL commercial real estate and $69,000 of SBL non-real estate was reversed from interest income, which represented interest accrued on loans placed into non-accrual status during the period. Material amounts of non-accrual interest reversals are charged to the ACL, but such amounts were not material during either the nine months ended September 30, 2023 or 2022.

Effective January 1, 2023 loan modifications to borrowers experiencing financial difficulty are required to be disclosed by type of modification and by type of loan. Prior accounting guidance classified loans which were modified as troubled debt restructurings only if the modification reflected a concession from the lender in the form of a below market interest rate or other concession in addition to borrower financial difficulty. Under the new guidance, loans with modifications will be reported whether a concession is made or not. Loans previously classified as troubled debt restructurings will continue to be reported in the following tables and loans with modifications made after January 1, 2023 will be reported under the new loan modification guidance. As of September 30, 2023, loans modified and related information are as follows (dollars in thousands):

September 30,

December 31,

2017

2016

Non-accrual loans

SBA non real estate

$                 2,310

$                  1,530
SBA commercial mortgage

1,226

-
Consumer

1,417

1,442
Total non-accrual loans

4,953

2,972

Loans past due 90 days or more

354

661
Total non-performing loans

5,307

3,633
Other real estate owned

-

104
Total non-performing assets

$                 5,307

$                  3,737


	September 30, 2023
	Interest rate reduction		Term extension		Payment delay as a result of a payment deferral		Interest rate reduction and payment deferral		Payment delay and term extension		Payment delay, term extension and interest rate reduction		Percent of total class of financing receivable
SBL non-real estate	$	—	$	—	$	156	$	—	$	—	$	—		—
Direct lease financing		—		—		—		—		—		—		—
SBL commercial mortgage		—		—		—		—		—		—		—
Other loans		—		—		—		—		—		—		—
Consumer - home equity		—		—		—		—		—		—		—
Total	$	—	$	—	$	156	$	—	$	—	$	—		—

The following table shows an analysis of loans that were modified during the twelve months prior to September 30, 2023 presented by loan classification (dollars in thousands):


	Payment Status (Amortized Cost Basis)
	30-59 Days		60-89 Days		90+ Days				Total
	past due		past due		still accruing		Non-accrual		delinquent		Current		Total
SBL non-real estate	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	156	$	156
SBL commercial mortgage		—		—		—		—		—		—		—
Other loans		—		—		—		—		—		—		—
Consumer - home equity		—		—		—		—		—		—		—
	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	156	$	156

There was one modified loan in the table above, for $156,000, which had a $2,200 reduction in monthly payment for six months, which constituted the average reduction.

~~The~~

Under previous accounting guidance, which was effective through December 31, 2022, the Company’s loans that were modified as of September 30, ~~2017~~2023 and December 31, ~~2016~~2022 and considered troubled debt restructurings are as follows (dollars in thousands):

September 30, 2017

December 31, 2016

Number

Pre-modification recorded investment

Post-modification recorded investment

Number

Pre-modification recorded investment

Post-modification recorded investment
SBA non real estate

4

$            1,013

$             1,013

2

$               844

$                844
Direct lease financing

1

285

285

1

734

734
Consumer

2

541

541

1

288

288
Total

7

$            1,839

$             1,839

4

$            1,866

$             1,866



	September 30, 2023						December 31, 2022
	Number		Pre-modification recorded investment		Post-modification recorded investment		Number		Pre-modification recorded investment		Post-modification recorded investment
SBL non-real estate		6	$	543	$	543		8	$	650	$	650
SBL commercial mortgage		1		834		834		1		834		834
Legacy commercial real estate		1		3,552		3,552		1		3,552		3,552
Consumer - home equity		1		231		231		1		239		239
Total⁽¹⁾		9	$	5,160	$	5,160		11	$	5,275	$	5,275

⁽¹⁾Troubled debt restructurings included non-accrual loans of $4.8 million and $1.4 million at September 30, 2023 and December 31, 2022, respectively.

The ~~balances~~table below ~~provide~~provides information as to how the loans were modified as troubled debt ~~restructurings~~restructuring loans as of September 30, ~~2017~~2023 and December 31, ~~2016~~2022 (in thousands):

September 30, 2017

December 31, 2016

Adjusted interest rate

Extended maturity

Combined rate and maturity

Adjusted interest rate

Extended maturity

Combined rate and maturity
SBA non real estate

$                    -

$               144

$                869

$                 -

$               144

$                700
Direct lease financing

-

-

285

-

-

734
Consumer

-

-

541

-

-

288
Total

$                    -

$               144

$             1,695

$                 -

$               144

$             1,722



	September 30, 2023						December 31, 2022
	Adjusted interest rate		Extended maturity		Combined rate and maturity		Adjusted interest rate		Extended maturity		Combined rate and maturity
SBL non-real estate	$	—	$	—	$	543	$	—	$	—	$	650
SBL commercial mortgage		—		—		834		—		—		834
Legacy commercial real estate		—		—		3,552		—		—		3,552
Consumer - home equity		—		—		231		—		—		239
Total⁽¹⁾	$	—	$	—	$	5,160	$	—	$	—	$	5,275

~~The following table summarizes, as~~⁽¹⁾Troubled debt restructurings included non-accrual loans of $4.8 million and $1.4 million at September 30, ~~2017, loans that had been restructured within the last 12 months that have subsequently defaulted.~~

Number

Pre-modification recorded investment
SBA non real estate

2

$ 679
Total

2

$ 679

~~As of September 30, 2017~~2023 and December 31, ~~2016, the~~2022, respectively.

The Company had no commitments to ~~lend~~extend additional ~~funds~~credit to ~~loan customers whose loan terms have been~~loans classified as either modified inor troubled debt ~~restructurings.~~

~~A detail~~restructurings as of ~~the changes in the allowance for loan and lease losses by loan category is as follows (in thousands):~~

SBA non real estate

SBA commercial mortgage

SBA construction

Direct lease financing

SBLOC

Other specialty lending

Other consumer loans

Unallocated

Total
September 30, 2017

Beginning balance

$              1,976

$                 737

$                   76

$             1,994

$              315

$               32

$              975

$                 227

$                6,332
Charge-offs

(343)

-

-

(780)

-

-

(113)

-

(1,236)
Recoveries

13

-

-

-

-

-

24

-

37
Provision (credit)

1,576

521

22

196

45

36

(220)

(26)

2,150
Ending balance

$              3,222

$              1,258

$                   98

$             1,410

$              360

$               68

$              666

$                 201

$                7,283

Ending balance: Individually evaluated for impairment

$              1,659

$                 185

$                      -

$                     -

$                   -

$                 -

$                   -

$                      -

$                1,844

Ending balance: Collectively evaluated for impairment

$              1,563

$              1,073

$                   98

$             1,410

$              360

$               68

$              666

$                 201

$                5,439

Loans:

Ending balance

$            72,055

$          132,997

$            14,205

$         369,069

$       720,279

$        36,664

$         20,107

$              8,684

$         1,374,060

Ending balance: Individually evaluated for impairment

$              2,645

$              1,226

$                      -

$                284

$                   -

$                 -

$           1,700

$                      -

$                5,855

Ending balance: Collectively evaluated for impairment

$            69,410

$          131,771

$            14,205

$         368,785

$       720,279

$        36,664

$         18,407

$              8,684

$         1,368,205

December 31, 2016

Beginning balance

$                844

$                408

$                  48

$             1,022

$              762

$              199

$              936

$                181

$                4,400
Charge-offs

(128)

-

-

(119)

-

-

(1,211)

-

(1,458)
Recoveries

1

-

-

17

12

-

30
Provision (credit)

1,259

329

28

1,074

(447)

(167)

1,238

46

3,360
Ending balance

$             1,976

$                737

$                  76

$             1,994

$              315

$                32

$              975

$                227

$                6,332

Ending balance: Individually evaluated for impairment

$                938

$                     -

$                     -

$                216

$                   -

$                  -

$                   -

$                     -

$                1,154

Ending balance: Collectively evaluated for impairment

$             1,038

$                737

$                  76

$             1,778

$              315

$                32

$              975

$                227

$                5,178

Loans:

Ending balance

$           74,644

$         126,159

$             8,826

$         346,645

$       630,400

$         11,073

$         17,374

$             7,790

$         1,222,911

Ending balance: Individually evaluated for impairment

$             2,374

$                     -

$                     -

$                734

$                   -

$                  -

$           1,730

$                     -

$                4,838

Ending balance: Collectively evaluated for impairment

$           72,270

$         126,159

$             8,826

$         345,911

$       630,400

$         11,073

$         15,644

$             7,790

$         1,218,073

September 30, 2016

Beginning balance

$                844

$                408

$                  48

$             1,022

$              762

$              199

$              936

$                181

4,400
Charge-offs

(76)

-

-

(63)

-

-

(39)

-

(178)
Recoveries

1

-

-

18

-

-

7

-

26
Provision (credit)

1,179

343

7

568

(451)

(143)

176

131

1,810
Ending balance

$             1,948

$                751

$                  55

$             1,545

$              311

$                56

$           1,080

$                312

$                6,058

Ending balance: Individually evaluated for impairment

$                939

$                     -

$                     -

$                     -

$                   -

$                  -

$              474

$                     -

$                1,413

Ending balance: Collectively evaluated for impairment

$             1,009

$                751

$                  55

$             1,545

$              311

$                56

$              606

$                312

$                4,645

Loans:

Ending balance

$           74,262

$         117,053

$             6,317

$         332,632

$       621,456

$         20,076

$         19,375

$             7,066

$         1,198,237

Ending balance: Individually evaluated for impairment

$             2,774

$                     -

$                     -

$                     -

$                   -

$                  -

$           2,707

$                     -

$                5,481

Ending balance: Collectively evaluated for impairment

$           71,488

$         117,053

$             6,317

$         332,632

$       621,456

$         20,076

$         16,668

$             7,066

$         1,192,756

~~The Company did not have loans acquired with deteriorated credit quality at either~~ September 30, ~~2017~~2023 or December 31, ~~2016.~~2022.

Under the previous accounting guidance explained above, when loans were classified as troubled debt restructurings, the Company estimated the value of underlying collateral and repayment sources. A specific reserve in the ACL was established if the collateral valuation, less estimated disposition costs, was lower than the recorded loan value. The amount of the specific reserve served to increase the provision for credit losses in the quarter the loan was classified as a troubled debt restructuring. As of September 30, 2023, there were nine troubled debt restructured loans with an aggregate balance of $5.2 million which had specific reserves of $579,000. As of December 31, 2022, there were eleven troubled debt restructured loans with an aggregate balance of $5.3 million which had specific reserves of $637,000. Substantially all of these reserves related to the non-guaranteed portion of SBA loans for start-up businesses. While the new guidance eliminates the troubled debt restructuring classification, loans previously classified as such will now be reported as loans with modifications, whether or not the modification reflected a lender concession. Specific reserves for loans with balances which exceed collateral values will continue to be required in the ACL.

The following table summarizes loans that were restructured within the twelve months ended September 30, 2023 that have subsequently defaulted (in thousands):


	September 30, 2023
	Number	Pre-modification recorded investment
SBL non-real estate	2	$	174
Legacy commercial real estate	1		3,552
Total	3	$	3,726

~~A detail~~Management estimates the ACL quarterly and for most loan categories uses relevant available internal and external historical loan performance information to determine the quantitative component of the reserve and current economic conditions, and reasonable and supportable forecasts and other factors to determine the qualitative component of the reserve. Reserves on specific credit-deteriorated loans comprise the third and final component of the reserve. Historical credit loss experience provides the quantitative basis for the estimation of expected credit losses over the estimated remaining life of the loans. The qualitative component of the ACL is designed to be responsive to changes in portfolio credit quality and the impact of current and future economic conditions on loan performance, and is subjective. The review of the appropriateness of the ACL is performed by the Chief Credit Officer and presented to the Audit Committee of the Company’s ~~delinquent loans by~~Board of Directors (the “Board”) for approval. With the exception of SBLOC and IBLOC, which utilize probability of loss/loss given default, and the other loan category, which uses discounted cash flow to determine a reserve, the quantitative components for remaining categories are determined by establishing reserves on loan pools with similar risk characteristics based on a lifetime loss-rate model, or vintage analysis, as described in the following paragraph. Loans that do not share risk characteristics are evaluated on an individual basis. If foreclosure is believed to be probable or repayment is expected from the sale of collateral, a reserve for deficiency is established within the ACL. Those reserves are estimated based on the difference between loan principal and the estimated fair value of the collateral, adjusted for estimated disposition costs.

Except for SBLOC, IBLOC and other loans as ~~follows (in thousands):~~noted above, for purposes of determining the quantitative historical loss reserve for each similar risk pool, the loans not assigned an individual reserve are segregated by product type, to recognize differing risk characteristics within portfolio segments, and an average historical loss rate is calculated for each product type. Loss rates are computed by classifying net charge-offs by year of loan origin, and dividing into total originations for that specific year. This methodology is referred to as vintage analysis. The average loss rate is then projected over the estimated remaining loan lives unique to each loan pool, to determine estimated lifetime losses. For SBLOC and IBLOC, since significant losses have not been incurred, probability of loss/loss given default considerations are utilized. For the other loan category discounted cash flow is utilized to determine a reserve. The Company also considers the need for an additional ACL based upon qualitative factors such as the Company’s current loan performance statistics by pool and economic conditions. These qualitative factors are intended to account for forward looking expectations over a twelve to eighteen month period not reflected in historical loss rates and otherwise unaccounted for in the quantitative process. Accordingly, such factors may increase or decrease the allowance compared to historical loss rates as the Company’s forward looking expectations change. The qualitative factor percentages are applied against the pool balances as of the end of the period. Aside from the qualitative adjustments to account for forward looking expectations of loss over a twelve to eighteen month projection period, the balance of the ACL reverts to the Company’s quantitative analysis derived from its historical loss rates. The qualitative and quantitative historical loss rate components, together with the allowances on specific credit-deteriorated loans, comprise the total ACL.

30-59 Days

60-89 Days

90 Days

Total

Total
September 30, 2017

past due

past due

or greater

Non-accrual

past due

Current

loans
SBA non real estate

$                   272

$                   165

$                        -

$                2,310

$                2,747

$               69,308

$               72,055
SBA commercial mortgage

-

-

-

1,226

1,226

131,771

132,997
SBA construction

-

-

-

-

-

14,205

14,205
Direct lease financing

5,065

1,060

354

-

6,479

362,590

369,069
SBLOC

-

-

-

-

-

720,279

720,279
Other specialty lending

-

-

-

-

-

36,664

36,664
Consumer - other

-

-

-

-

-

9,585

9,585
Consumer - home equity

144

-

-

1,417

1,561

8,961

10,522
Unamortized loan fees and costs

-

-

-

-

-

8,684

8,684

$                5,481

$                1,225

$                   354

$                4,953

$              12,013

$          1,362,047

$          1,374,060

30-59 Days

60-89 Days

90 Days

Total

Total
December 31, 2016

past due

past due

or greater

Non-accrual

past due

Current

loans
SBA non real estate

$                   559

$                      -

$                        -

$                1,530

$                2,089

$               72,555

$               74,644
SBA commercial mortgage

-

-

-

-

-

126,159

126,159
SBA construction

-

-

-

-

-

8,826

8,826
Direct lease financing

11,856

1,998

661

-

14,515

332,130

346,645
SBLOC

-

-

-

-

-

630,400

630,400
Other specialty lending

-

-

-

-

-

11,073

11,073
Consumer - other

-

-

-

-

-

5,403

5,403
Consumer - home equity

155

-

-

1,442

1,597

10,374

11,971
Unamortized loan fees and costs

-

-

-

-

-

7,790

7,790

$              12,570

$               1,998

$                   661

$                2,972

$              18,201

$          1,204,710

$          1,222,911

A similar process is employed to calculate an ACL assigned to off-balance sheet commitments, which are comprised of unfunded loan commitments and letters of credit. That ACL for unfunded commitments is recorded in other liabilities. Even though portions of the ACL may be allocated to loans that have been individually measured for credit deterioration, the entire ACL is available for any credit that, in management’s judgment, should be charged off.

At September 30, 2023, the ACL amounted to $24.1 million of which $10.7 million of allowances resulted from the Company’s historical charge-off ratios, $1.8 million from reserves on specific loans, with the balance comprised of the qualitative components. The $10.7 million resulted primarily from SBA non-real estate and leasing charge-offs. The proportion of qualitative reserves compared to charge-off history related reserves reflects that significant charge-offs have not been experienced in the Company’s largest loan portfolios consisting of SBLOC, IBLOC and real estate bridge lending. The absence of significant respective charge-offs reflects, at least in part, the nature of related collateral consisting of marketable securities, the cash value of life insurance and workforce apartment buildings. As charge-offs are nonetheless possible, significant subjectivity is required to consider qualitative factors to derive the related components of the allowance.

The Company ranks its qualitative factors in five levels: minimal, low, moderate, moderate-high and high-risk. The individual qualitative factors for each portfolio segment have their own scale based on an analysis of that segment. A high-risk ranking results in the largest increase in the ACL calculation with each level below having a lesser impact on a sliding scale. The qualitative factors used for each portfolio are described below in the description of each portfolio segment. When the Company adopted current expected credit loss accounting (“CECL”) methodology as of January 1, 2020, the management assumption was that some degree of economic slowdown should be considered over the next eighteen months. That belief reflected the length of the current economic expansion and the relatively high level of unsustainable U.S. government deficit spending. Accordingly, the economic qualitative factor for certain loan pools was set at moderate as of January 1, 2020. Based on the uncertainty as to how the COVID-19 pandemic would impact the Company’s loan pools, the Company increased certain qualitative factors to moderate and moderate-high in 2020. In the second quarter of 2021, the Company reassessed those factors and reversed increases to moderate-high for certain pools, based upon increased vaccination rates and significant reopening of the economy. As a result of continuing economic uncertainty, including heightened inflation and increased risks of recession, the qualitative factors which had been set in anticipation of a downturn at January 1, 2020, were maintained through the third quarter of 2022. In the fourth quarter of 2022, as risks of a recession increased, the economic qualitative risk factor was increased for non-real estate SBL and leasing. Those higher qualitative allocations were retained in the first quarter of 2023, as negative economic indications persisted. In the second quarter of 2023, CECL model adjustments of $1.7 million resulted from a $2.5 million CECL model decrease from changes in estimated average lives, partially offset by a $794,000 CECL model increase resulting from increasing economic and collateral risk factors to respective moderate-high and moderate risk levels. The elevated economic risk level for leasing reflected input from department heads regarding the potential borrower impact of the higher rate environment. The elevated collateral risk level for leasing reflected lower auction prices for vehicles and uncertainty over the extent to which such prices might decrease in the future. The adjustment for average lives reflected a change in the estimated lives of leases, higher variances for which may result from their short maturities. In the third quarter of 2023, there were indications of auction price stabilization, while the auto workers’ strike could reduce supply and drive up prices. Nonetheless, the elevated risk levels were maintained. The third quarter provision of $1.8 million reflected the impact of $922,000 of quarterly net-charge offs, primarily from leasing.

The Company has not increased the qualitative risk levels for SBLOC or IBLOC because of the nature of related collateral. SBLOC loans are subject to maximum loan to marketable securities value, and notwithstanding historic drops in the stock market in recent years, losses have not been realized. IBLOC loans are limited to borrowers with insurance companies that exceed credit requirements, and loan amounts are limited to life insurance cash values. The Company also has not increased the economic factor for multi-family real estate bridge lending. While Federal Reserve rate increases directly increase real estate bridge loan floating-rate borrowing costs, those borrowers are required to purchase interest rate caps that will partially limit the increase in borrowing costs during the term of the loan. Additionally, there continues to be several additional mitigating factors within the multifamily sector that should continue to fuel demand. Higher interest rates are increasing the cost to purchase a home, which in turn is increasing the number of renters and subsequent demand for multifamily. The softening demand for new homes should continue to exacerbate the current housing shortage, and therefore continue to fuel demand for multifamily apartment homes. Additionally, higher rents in the multifamily sector are causing renters to be more price sensitive, which is driving demand for most of the apartment buildings within the Company’s loan portfolio which management considers “workforce” housing. As a result, the REBL qualitative economic factor was not increased.

The economic qualitative factor is based on the estimated impact of economic conditions on the loan pools, as distinguished from the economic factors themselves, for the following reasons. The Company has not experienced significant multi-family (apartment building) loan charge-offs, despite stressed economic conditions. Accordingly, the ACL for this pool was derived from a qualitative factor based on industry loss information for multi-family housing. Similarly, the Company’s charge-offs have been virtually non-existent for SBLOC and IBLOC notwithstanding stressed economic periods, and their ACL is determined by qualitative factors. Investment advisor loans were first offered in 2020 with limited performance history, during which charge-offs have not been experienced. For investment advisor loans, the nature of the underlying ultimate repayment source was considered, namely the fee-based advisory income streams resulting from investment portfolios under management, and the impact changes in economic conditions would have on those payment streams. The qualitative factors used for this and the other portfolios are described below in the description of each portfolio segment. Additionally, the Company’s charge-off histories for SBLs, primarily SBA, and leases have not correlated with economic conditions, including trends in unemployment. While specific economic factors did not correlate with actual historical losses, multiple economic factors are considered in the economic qualitative factor. For the non-guaranteed portion of SBA loans, leases, real estate bridge lending and investment advisor financing, the Company’s loss forecasting analysis included a review of industry statistics. However, the

Company’s own charge-off history and average life estimates, for categories in which the Company has experienced charge-offs, was the primary quantitatively-derived element in the forecasts. The qualitative component results from management’s qualitative assessments which consider internal and external inputs.

Below are the portfolio segments used to pool loans with similar risk characteristics and align with the Company’s methodology for measuring expected credit losses. These pools have similar risk and collateral characteristics, and certain of these pools are broken down further in determining and applying the vintage loss estimates previously discussed. For instance, within the direct lease financing pool, government and public institution leases are considered separately. Additionally, the Company evaluates its loans under an internal loan risk rating system as a means of identifying problem loans. The special mention classification indicates weaknesses that may, if not cured, threaten the borrower’s future repayment ability. A substandard classification reflects an existing weakness indicating the possible inadequacy of net worth and other repayment sources. These classifications are used both by regulators and peers, as they have been correlated with an increased probability of credit losses. A summary of the Company’s primary portfolio pools and loans accordingly classified, by year of origination, at September 30, 2023 and December 31, 2022 are as follows (in thousands):


As of September 30, 2023	2023		2022		2021		2020		2019		Prior		Revolving loans at amortized cost		Total
SBL non real estate
Non-rated	$	255	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	255
Pass⁽¹⁾		35,310		34,742		28,224		10,095		4,491		5,219		—		118,081
Special mention		471		495		261		1,114		123		913		—		3,377
Substandard		—		—		124		532		251		570		—		1,477
Total SBL non-real estate		36,036		35,237		28,609		11,741		4,865		6,702		—		123,190

SBL commercial mortgage
Pass		67,290		135,496		98,083		68,315		59,030		100,291		—		528,505
Special mention		375		—		7,439		—		603		661		—		9,078
Substandard		—		—		—		452		1,853		2,492		—		4,797
Total SBL commercial mortgage		67,665		135,496		105,522		68,767		61,486		103,444		—		542,380

SBL construction
Pass		1,141		4,687		1,669		927		4,305		—		—		12,729
Special mention		—		—		3,090		—		—		—		—		3,090
Substandard		—		—		2,675		—		—		710		—		3,385
Total SBL construction		1,141		4,687		7,434		927		4,305		710		—		19,204

Direct lease financing
Non-rated		3,104		—		—		—		—		—		—		3,104
Pass		228,521		245,135		107,593		49,034		21,724		6,652		—		658,659
Special mention		—		928		427		149		206		—		—		1,710
Substandard		58		3,031		2,671		725		124		126		—		6,735
Total direct lease financing		231,683		249,094		110,691		49,908		22,054		6,778		—		670,208

SBLOC
Non-rated		—		—		—		—		—		—		1,279		1,279
Pass		—		—		—		—		—		—		1,006,643		1,006,643
Total SBLOC		—		—		—		—		—		—		1,007,922		1,007,922

IBLOC
Non-rated		—		—		—		—		—		—		3,842		3,842
Pass		—		—		—		—		—		—		707,550		707,550
Substandard		—		—		—		—		—		—		1,199		1,199
Total IBLOC		—		—		—		—		—		—		712,591		712,591

Advisor financing
Non-rated		198		—		—		—		—		—		—		198
Pass		58,707		63,900		50,339		26,298		—		—		—		199,244
Total advisor financing		58,905		63,900		50,339		26,298		—		—		—		199,442

Real estate bridge loans
Pass		234,408		1,004,539		513,418		—		—		—		—		1,752,365
Special mention		—		44,159		—		—		—		—		—		44,159
Substandard		—		—		51,700		—		—		—		—		51,700
Total real estate bridge loans		234,408		1,048,698		565,118		—		—		—		—		1,848,224

Other loans
Non-rated		3,416		—		—		—		—		11,669		—		15,085
Pass		166		261		370		2,610		2,370		41,334		1,638		48,749
Special mention		—		—		—		—		—		394		—		394
Substandard		—		—		—		—		—		3,688		—		3,688
Total other loans(2)		3,582		261		370		2,610		2,370		57,085		1,638		67,916

	$	633,420	$	1,537,373	$	868,083	$	160,251	$	95,080	$	174,719	$	1,722,151	$	5,191,077

Unamortized loan fees and costs		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		7,895
Total															$	5,198,972

⁽¹⁾Included in the SBL non real estate pass total of $118.1 million was $2.3 million of SBA Paycheck Protection Program (“PPP”) loans, which are guaranteed by the U.S. government.

⁽²⁾Included in Other loans are $12.1 million of SBA loans purchased for Community Reinvestment Act (“CRA”) purposes as of September 30, 2023. These loans are classified as SBL in the Company’s loan table, which classifies loans by type, as opposed to risk characteristics.


As of December 31, 2022	2022		2021		2020		2019		2018		Prior		Revolving loans at amortized cost		Total
SBL non real estate
Non-rated⁽¹⁾	$	2,075	$	4,266	$	273	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	6,614
Pass		32,402		30,388		13,432		5,599		3,931		4,555		—		90,307
Special mention		—		—		—		—		585		284		—		869
Substandard		—		—		320		242		15		642		—		1,219
Total SBL non-real estate		34,477		34,654		14,025		5,841		4,531		5,481		—		99,009

SBL commercial mortgage
Non-rated		10,600		—		—		—		—		—		—		10,600
Pass		116,647		97,968		64,388		64,692		42,461		68,193		—		454,349
Special mention		—		—		—		1,853		—		630		—		2,483
Substandard		—		—		141		—		834		589		—		1,564
Total SBL commercial mortgage		127,247		97,968		64,529		66,545		43,295		69,412		—		468,996

SBL construction
Pass		3,153		11,650		9,712		2,964		—		—		—		27,479
Substandard		—		2,676		—		—		—		710		—		3,386
Total SBL construction		3,153		14,326		9,712		2,964		—		710		—		30,865
		.
Direct lease financing
Non-rated		73,424		30,900		8,245		1,153		429		108		—		114,259
Pass		254,063		129,763		71,043		38,038		13,722		4,291		—		510,920
Special mention		—		—		61		—		—		—		—		61
Substandard		2,854		2,324		1,658		84		—		—		—		6,920
Total direct lease financing		330,341		162,987		81,007		39,275		14,151		4,399		—		632,160

SBLOC
Non-rated		—		—		—		—		—		—		4,284		4,284
Pass		—		—		—		—		—		—		1,205,098		1,205,098
Total SBLOC		—		—		—		—		—		—		1,209,382		1,209,382

IBLOC
Non-rated		—		—		—		—		—		—		555,219		555,219
Pass		—		—		—		—		—		—		567,868		567,868
Total IBLOC		—		—		—		—		—		—		1,123,087		1,123,087

Advisor financing
Non-rated		3,318		909		—		—		—		—		—		4,227
Pass		68,078		64,498		35,665		—		—		—		—		168,241
Total advisor financing		71,396		65,407		35,665		—		—		—		—		172,468

Real estate bridge loans
Pass		1,009,708		659,323		—		—		—		—		—		1,669,031
Total real estate bridge loans		1,009,708		659,323		—		—		—		—		—		1,669,031

Other loans
Non-rated		4,374		29		37		—		—		16,326		488		21,254
Pass		264		366		2,611		2,750		2,820		41,571		1,187		51,569
Special mention		—		—		—		—		—		3,552		—		3,552
Substandard		—		—		—		—		—		692		56		748
Total other loans⁽²⁾		4,638		395		2,648		2,750		2,820		62,141		1,731		77,123

Total	$	1,580,960	$	1,035,060	$	207,586	$	117,375	$	64,797	$	142,143	$	2,334,200	$	5,482,121

Unamortized loan fees and costs		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		4,732
Total															$	5,486,853

⁽¹⁾Included in the SBL non real estate non-rated total of $6.6 million was $4.5 million of SBA PPP loans, which are guaranteed by the U.S. government.

⁽²⁾Included in Other loans are $15.4 million of SBA loans purchased for CRA purposes as of December 31, 2022. These loans are classified as SBL in the Company’s loan table, which classifies loans by type, as opposed to risk characteristics.

SBL. Substantially all SBLs consist of SBA loans. The Bank participates in loan programs established by the SBA, including the 7(a) Loan Guarantee Program (the “7(a) Program”), the 504 Fixed Asset Financing Program (the “504 Program”), and the discontinued PPP. The 7(a) Program is designed to help small business borrowers start or expand their businesses by providing partial guarantees of loans made by banks and non-bank lending institutions for specific business purposes, including long or short term working capital; funds for

the purchase of equipment, machinery, supplies and materials; funds for the purchase, construction or renovation of real estate; and funds to acquire, operate or expand an existing business or refinance existing debt, all under conditions established by the SBA. The 504 Program includes the financing of real estate and commercial mortgages. In 2020 and 2021, the Company also participated in the PPP, which provided short-term loans to small businesses. PPP loans are fully guaranteed by the U.S. government. This program was a specific response to the COVID-19 pandemic, and the vast majority of these loans have been reimbursed by the U.S. government, with $2.3 million remaining to be reimbursed as of September 30, 2023. The Company segments the SBL portfolio into four pools: non-real estate, commercial mortgage and construction to capture the risk characteristics of each pool, and the PPP loans discussed above. PPP loans are not included in the risk pools because they have inherently different risk characteristics due to the U.S. government guarantee. In the table above, the PPP loans are included in non-rated SBL non-real estate. The qualitative factors for SBL loans focus on pool loan performance, underlying collateral for collateral dependent loans and changes in economic conditions. Additionally, the construction segment adds a qualitative factor for general construction risk, such as construction delays resulting from labor shortages or availability/pricing of construction materials.

Direct lease financing. The Company provides lease financing for commercial and government vehicle fleets and, to a lesser extent, provides lease financing for other equipment. Leases are either open-end or closed-end. An open-end lease is one in which, at the end of the lease term, the lessee must pay the difference between the amount at which the Company sells the leased asset and the stated termination value. Termination value is a contractual value agreed to by the parties at the inception of a lease as to the value of the leased asset at the end of the lease term. A closed-end lease is one for which no such payment is due on lease termination. In a closed-end lease, the risk that the amount received on a sale of the leased asset will be less than the residual value is assumed by the Bank, as lessor. The qualitative factors for direct lease financing focus on underlying collateral for collateral dependent loans, portfolio loan performance, loan concentrations and changes in economic conditions.

SBLOC. SBLOC loans are made to individuals, trusts and entities and are secured by a pledge of marketable securities maintained in one or more accounts for which the Company obtains a securities account control agreement. The securities pledged may be either debt or equity securities or a combination thereof, but all such securities must be listed for trading on a national securities exchange or automated inter-dealer quotation system. SBLOCs are typically payable on demand. Maximum SBLOC line amounts are calculated by applying a standard “advance rate” calculation against the eligible security type depending on asset class: typically, up to 50% for equity securities and mutual fund securities and 80% for investment grade (Standard & Poor’s rating of BBB- or higher, or Moody’s rating of Baa3 or higher) municipal or corporate debt securities. Substantially all SBLOCs have full recourse to the borrower. The underlying securities collateral for SBLOC loans is monitored on a daily basis to confirm the composition of the client portfolio and its daily market value. The primary qualitative factor in the SBLOC analysis is the ratio of loans outstanding to market value. This factor has been maintained at low levels, which has remained appropriate as losses have not materialized despite the historic declines in the equity markets during 2020, during which there were no losses. Significant losses have not been incurred since inception of this line of business. Additionally, the advance rates noted above were established to provide the Company with protection from declines in market conditions from the origination date of the lines of credit.

IBLOC. IBLOC loans are collateralized by the cash surrender value of eligible insurance policies. Should a loan default, the primary risks for IBLOCs are if the insurance company issuing the policy were to become insolvent, or if that company would fail to recognize the Bank’s assignment of policy proceeds. To mitigate these risks, insurance company ratings are periodically evaluated for compliance with Bank standards. Additionally, the Bank utilizes assignments of cash surrender value, which legal counsel has concluded are enforceable. Significant losses have not been incurred since inception of this line of business. The qualitative factors for IBLOC primarily focus on the concentration risk with insurance companies.

Investment advisor financing.In 2020, the Bank began originating loans to investment advisors for purposes of debt refinancing, acquisition of another firm or internal succession. Maximum loan amounts are subject to loan-to-value ratios of 70%, based on third party business appraisals, but may be increased depending upon the debt service coverage ratio. Personal guarantees and blanket business liens are obtained as appropriate. Loan repayment is highly dependent on fee streams from advisor clientele. Accordingly, loss of fee-based investment advisory clients or negative market performance may reduce fees and pose a risk to these credits. As credit losses have not been experienced, the ACL is determined by qualitative factors. The qualitative factors for investment advisor financing focus on historical industry losses, changes in lending policies and procedures, portfolio performance and economic conditions.

Real estate bridge loans. Real estate bridge loans are transitional commercial mortgage loans which are made to improve and rehabilitate existing properties which already have cash flow, and which are securitized by those properties. The portfolio is comprised primarily of apartment buildings. Prior to 2020, such loans were originated for securitization and loans which had been originated but not securitized continue to be accounted for at fair value in “Commercial loans, at fair value”, on the balance sheet. In 2021, originations resumed and are being held for investment in “Loans, net of deferred fees and costs”, on the balance sheet. As credit losses have not been experienced for multi-family (apartment building loans) which comprise the REBL portfolio, the ACL is determined by qualitative factors. Qualitative factors focus on historical industry losses, changes in economic conditions, underlying collateral and portfolio performance.

Other loans. Other loans include commercial and consumer loans including home equity lines of credit which the Company generally no longer offers. Qualitative factors focus on changes in the underlying collateral for collateral dependent loans, portfolio loan performance, loan concentrations and changes in economic conditions.

Expected credit losses are estimated over the estimated remaining lives of loans. The estimate excludes possible extensions, renewals and modifications unless either of the following applies: management has a reasonable expectation that a loan will be restructured, or the extension or renewal options are included in the borrower contract and are not unconditionally cancellable by us.

The Company does not measure an ACL on accrued interest receivable balances, because these balances are written off in a timely manner as a reduction to interest income when loans are placed on non-accrual status.

ACL on off-balance sheet credit exposures. The Company estimates expected credit losses over the contractual period in which the Company is exposed to credit risk via a contractual obligation to extend credit, unless that obligation is unconditionally cancellable by the Company. The ACL on such off-balance sheet credit exposures, also referred to as loan commitments, is adjusted through the provision for credit losses. The estimate considers the likelihood that funding will occur over the estimated life of the commitment. The amount of the ACL on such exposures as of September 30, 2023 and as of December 31, 2022 was $2.4 million and $2.8 million, respectively.

A detail of the changes in the ACL by loan category and summary of loans evaluated individually and collectively for credit deterioration is as follows (in thousands):



	September 30, 2023
	SBL non-real estate		SBL commercial mortgage		SBL construction		Direct lease financing		SBLOC / IBLOC		Advisor financing		Real estate bridge loans		Other loans		Deferred fees and costs		Total
Beginning 1/1/2023	$	5,028	$	2,585	$	565	$	7,972	$	1,167	$	1,293	$	3,121	$	643	$	—	$	22,374
Charge-offs		(871)		—		—		(2,804)		—		—		—		(3)		—		(3,678)
Recoveries		446		75		—		220		—		—		—		299		—		1,040
Provision (credit)⁽¹⁾		1,250		19		(323)		3,583		(291)		203		335		(367)		—		4,409
Ending balance	$	5,853	$	2,679	$	242	$	8,971	$	876	$	1,496	$	3,456	$	572	$	—	$	24,145

Ending balance: Individually evaluated for expected credit loss	$	566	$	419	$	44	$	774	$	17	$	—	$	—	$	11	$	—	$	1,831

Ending balance: Collectively evaluated for expected credit loss	$	5,287	$	2,260	$	198	$	8,197	$	859	$	1,496	$	3,456	$	561	$	—	$	22,314

Loans:
Ending balance	$	130,579	$	547,107	$	19,204	$	670,208	$	1,720,513	$	199,442	$	1,848,224	$	55,800	$	7,895	$	5,198,972

Ending balance: Individually evaluated for expected credit loss	$	1,337	$	2,945	$	3,385	$	3,351	$	475	$	—	$	—	$	3,919	$	—	$	15,412

Ending balance: Collectively evaluated for expected credit loss	$	129,242	$	544,162	$	15,819	$	666,857	$	1,720,038	$	199,442	$	1,848,224	$	51,881	$	7,895	$	5,183,560


	December 31, 2022
	SBL non-real estate		SBL commercial mortgage		SBL construction		Direct lease financing		SBLOC / IBLOC		Advisor financing		Real estate bridge loans		Other loans		Deferred fees and costs		Total
Beginning 1/1/2022	$	5,415	$	2,952	$	432	$	5,817	$	964	$	868	$	1,181	$	177	$	—	$	17,806
Charge-offs		(885)		—		—		(576)		—		—		—		—		—		(1,461)
Recoveries		140		—		—		124		—		—		—		24		—		288
Provision (credit)⁽¹⁾		358		(367)		133		2,607		203		425		1,940		442		—		5,741
Ending balance	$	5,028	$	2,585	$	565	$	7,972	$	1,167	$	1,293	$	3,121	$	643	$	—	$	22,374

Ending balance: Individually evaluated for expected credit loss	$	525	$	441	$	153	$	933	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	15	$	—	$	2,067

Ending balance: Collectively evaluated for expected credit loss	$	4,503	$	2,144	$	412	$	7,039	$	1,167	$	1,293	$	3,121	$	628	$	—	$	20,307

Loans:
Ending balance	$	108,954	$	474,496	$	30,864	$	632,160	$	2,332,469	$	172,468	$	1,669,031	$	61,679	$	4,732	$	5,486,853

Ending balance: Individually evaluated for expected credit loss	$	1,374	$	1,423	$	3,386	$	3,550	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	4,539	$	—	$	14,272

Ending balance: Collectively evaluated for expected credit loss	$	107,580	$	473,073	$	27,478	$	628,610	$	2,332,469	$	172,468	$	1,669,031	$	57,140	$	4,732	$	5,472,581



	September 30, 2022
	SBL non-real estate		SBL commercial mortgage		SBL construction		Direct lease financing		SBLOC / IBLOC		Advisor financing		Real estate bridge loans		Other loans		Deferred fees and costs		Total
Beginning 1/1/2022	$	5,415	$	2,952	$	432	$	5,817	$	964	$	868	$	1,181	$	177	$	—	$	17,806
Charge-offs		(861)		—		—		(312)		—		—		—		—		—		(1,173)
Recoveries		57		—		—		108		—		—		—		—		—		165
Provision (credit)⁽¹⁾		300		(794)		(6)		682		220		396		1,602		491		—		2,891
Ending balance	$	4,911	$	2,158	$	426	$	6,295	$	1,184	$	1,264	$	2,783		668	$	—	$	19,689

Ending balance: Individually evaluated for expected credit loss	$	594	$	222	$	34	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	13	$	—	$	863

Ending balance: Collectively evaluated for expected credit loss	$	4,317	$	1,936	$	392	$	6,295	$	1,184	$	1,264	$	2,783	$	655	$	—	$	18,826

Loans:
Ending balance	$	116,080	$	429,865	$	26,841	$	599,796	$	2,369,106	$	168,559	$	1,488,119	$	64,980	$	4,029	$	5,267,375

Ending balance: Individually evaluated for expected credit loss	$	1,347	$	1,423	$	710	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	4,442	$	—	$	7,922

Ending balance: Collectively evaluated for expected credit loss	$	114,733	$	428,442	$	26,131	$	599,796	$	2,369,106	$	168,559	$	1,488,119	$	60,538	$	4,029	$	5,259,453

⁽¹⁾The amount shown as the provision for credit losses for the period reflects the provision on credit losses for loans, while the consolidated statements of operations provision for credit losses includes provisions for unfunded commitments as follows: $393,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2023, $1.4 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2022, and $1.4 million for full year 2022.

A summary of the Company’s net charge-offs accordingly classified, by year of origination, at September 30, 2023 and December 31, 2022 are as follows (in thousands):


As of September 30, 2023		2023		2022		2021		2020		2019		Prior		Total
SBL non-real estate
Current period charge-offs	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	(871)	$	(871)
Current period recoveries		—		—		—		—		—		446		446
Current period SBL non-real estate net charge-offs		—		—		—		—		—		(425)		(425)

SBL commercial mortgage
Current period charge-offs		—		—		—		—		—		—		—
Current period recoveries		—		—		—		—		—		75		75
Current period SBL commercial mortgage net charge-offs		—		—		—		—		—		75		75

SBL construction
Current period charge-offs		—		—		—		—		—		—		—
Current period recoveries		—		—		—		—		—		—		—
Current period SBL construction net charge-offs		—		—		—		—		—		—		—

Direct lease financing
Current period charge-offs		(114)		(1,706)		(756)		(189)		(39)		—		(2,804)
Current period recoveries		—		30		105		70		—		15		220
Current period direct lease financing net charge-offs		(114)		(1,676)		(651)		(119)		(39)		15		(2,584)

SBLOC
Current period charge-offs		—		—		—		—		—		—		—
Current period recoveries		—		—		—		—		—		—		—
Current period SBLOC net charge-offs		—		—		—		—		—		—		—

IBLOC
Current period charge-offs		—		—		—		—		—		—		—
Current period recoveries		—		—		—		—		—		—		—
Current period IBLOC net charge-offs		—		—		—		—		—		—		—

Advisor financing
Current period charge-offs		—		—		—		—		—		—		—
Current period recoveries		—		—		—		—		—		—		—
Current period advisor financing net charge-offs		—		—		—		—		—		—		—

Real estate bridge loans
Current period charge-offs		—		—		—		—		—		—		—
Current period recoveries		—		—		—		—		—		—		—
Current period real estate bridge loans net charge-offs		—		—		—		—		—		—		—

Other loans
Current period charge-offs		—		—		—		—		—		(3)		(3)
Current period recoveries		—		—		—		—		—		299		299
Current period other loans net recoveries		—		—		—		—		—		296		296

Total
Current period charge-offs		(114)		(1,706)		(756)		(189)		(39)		(874)		(3,678)
Current period recoveries		—		30		105		70		—		835		1,040
Current period net charge-offs	$	(114)	$	(1,676)	$	(651)	$	(119)	$	(39)	$	(39)	$	(2,638)


As of December 31, 2022		2022		2021		2020		2019		2018		Prior		Total
SBL non-real estate
Current period charge-offs	$	—	$	—	$	(17)	$	—	$	—	$	(868)	$	(885)
Current period recoveries		—		—		2		—		8		130		140
Current period SBL non-real estate net charge-offs		—		—		(15)		—		8		(738)		(745)

SBL commercial mortgage
Current period charge-offs		—		—		—		—		—		—		—
Current period recoveries		—		—		—		—		—		—		—
Current period SBL commercial mortgage net charge-offs		—		—		—		—		—		—		—

SBL construction
Current period charge-offs		—		—		—		—		—		—		—
Current period recoveries		—		—		—		—		—		—		—
Current period SBL construction net charge-offs		—		—		—		—		—		—		—

Direct lease financing
Current period charge-offs		(93)		(308)		(150)		(25)		—		—		(576)
Current period recoveries		—		1		117		6		—		—		124
Current period direct lease financing net charge-offs		(93)		(307)		(33)		(19)		—		—		(452)

SBLOC
Current period charge-offs		—		—		—		—		—		—		—
Current period recoveries		—		—		—		—		—		—		—
Current period SBLOC net charge-offs		—		—		—		—		—		—		—

IBLOC
Current period charge-offs		—		—		—		—		—		—		—
Current period recoveries		—		—		—		—		—		—		—
Current period IBLOC net charge-offs		—		—		—		—		—		—		—

Advisor financing
Current period charge-offs		—		—		—		—		—		—		—
Current period recoveries		—		—		—		—		—		—		—
Current period advisor financing net charge-offs		—		—		—		—		—		—		—

Real estate bridge loans
Current period charge-offs		—		—		—		—		—		—		—
Current period recoveries		—		—		—		—		—		—		—
Current period real estate bridge loans net charge-offs		—		—		—		—		—		—		—

Other loans
Current period charge-offs		—		—		—		—		—		—		—
Current period recoveries		—		—		—		—		—		24		24
Current period other loans net charge-offs		—		—		—		—		—		24		24

Total
Current period charge-offs		(93)		(308)		(167)		(25)		—		(868)		(1,461)
Current period recoveries		—		1		119		6		8		154		288
Current period net charge-offs	$	(93)	$	(307)	$	(48)	$	(19)	$	8	$	(714)	$	(1,173)

The Company did not have loans acquired with deteriorated credit quality at either September 30, 2023 or December 31, 2022. In the first nine months of 2023, the Company purchased $2.0 million of lease receivables and $43.2 million of SBLs, none of which were credit deteriorated. Additionally, in the first nine months of 2023, the Company participated in SBLs with other institutions in the amount of $4.0 million.

The delinquent loans in the following table ~~provides information~~are treated as collateral dependent to the extent they have resulted from borrower financial difficulty (and not from administrative delays or other mitigating factors), and are not brought current. For non-accrual loans, the Company establishes a reserve in the allowance for credit losses for deficiencies between estimated collateral and loan carrying values. During the nine months ended September 30, 2023, the Company did not have any significant changes to the extent to which collateral secures its collateral dependent loans due to general collateral deterioration or from other factors. SBL non-real estate are collateralized by ~~credit risk rating indicator~~business assets, which may include certain real estate. SBL commercial mortgage and construction are collateralized by real estate for ~~each segment~~small businesses, while real estate bridge lending is primarily collateralized by apartmentbuildings, or other commercial real estate. SBLOC is collateralized by marketable investment securities while IBLOC is collateralized by the cash value of life insurance. Advisor financing is collateralized by investment advisors’ business franchises. Direct lease financing is collateralized primarily by vehicles, or equipment.

A detail of the Company’s delinquent loans by loan ~~portfolio, excluding loans held for sale, at the dates indicated~~category is as follows (in thousands):

September 30, 2017

Pass

Special mention

Substandard

Doubtful

Loss

Unrated subject to review *

Unrated not subject to review *

Total loans
SBA non real estate

$           44,996

$            3,981

$            4,107

$                   -

$                    -

$                        -

$                 18,971

$              72,055
SBA commercial mortgage

110,059

279

1,226

-

-

2,163

19,270

132,997
SBA construction

14,205

-

-

-

-

-

-

14,205
Direct lease financing

193,792

-

2,770

-

-

8,733

163,774

369,069
SBLOC

357,906

-

-

-

-

-

362,373

720,279
Other specialty lending

36,664

-

-

-

-

-

-

36,664
Consumer

8,791

283

1,885

-

-

-

9,148

20,107
Unamortized loan fees and costs

-

-

-

-

-

-

8,684

8,684

$         766,413

$            4,543

$            9,988

$                   -

$                    -

$              10,896

$               582,220

$         1,374,060

December 31, 2016

SBA non real estate

$           51,437

$            2,723

$            3,628

$                   -

$                    -

$                        -

$                 16,856

$              74,644
SBA commercial mortgage

92,485

-

-

-

-

15,164

18,510

126,159
SBA construction

8,060

-

-

-

-

-

766

8,826
Direct lease financing

122,571

-

3,736

-

-

30,881

189,457

346,645
SBLOC

277,489

-

-

-

-

-

352,911

630,400
Other specialty lending

11,073

-

-

-

-

-

-

11,073
Consumer

9,837

288

2,312

-

-

-

4,937

17,374
Unamortized loan fees and costs

-

-

-

-

-

-

7,790

7,790

$         572,952

$            3,011

$            9,676

$                   -

$                    -

$              46,045

$               591,227

$         1,222,911



	September 30, 2023
	30-59 Days		60-89 Days		90+ Days				Total				Total
	past due		past due		still accruing		Non-accrual		past due		Current		loans
SBL non-real estate	$	186	$	389	$	358	$	1,256	$	2,189	$	128,390	$	130,579
SBL commercial mortgage		—		1		—		2,945		2,946		544,161		547,107
SBL construction		—		—		—		3,385		3,385		15,819		19,204
Direct lease financing		3,021		1,672		207		3,351		8,251		661,957		670,208
SBLOC / IBLOC		11,947		2,691		75		475		15,188		1,705,325		1,720,513
Advisor financing		—		—		—		—		—		199,442		199,442
Real estate bridge loans		—		—		—		—		—		1,848,224		1,848,224
Other loans		302		40		37		3,688		4,067		51,733		55,800
Unamortized loan fees and costs		—		—		—		—		—		7,895		7,895
	$	15,456	$	4,793	$	677	$	15,100	$	36,026	$	5,162,946	$	5,198,972



	December 31, 2022
	30-59 Days		60-89 Days		90+ Days				Total				Total
	past due		past due		still accruing		Non-accrual		past due		Current		loans
SBL non-real estate	$	1,312	$	543	$	346	$	1,249	$	3,450	$	105,504	$	108,954
SBL commercial mortgage		1,853		5		297		1,423		3,578		470,918		474,496
SBL construction		—		—		—		3,386		3,386		27,478		30,864
Direct lease financing		4,035		2,053		539		3,550		10,177		621,983		632,160
SBLOC / IBLOC		14,782		343		2,869		—		17,994		2,314,475		2,332,469
Advisor financing		—		—		—		—		—		172,468		172,468
Real estate bridge loans		—		—		—		—		—		1,669,031		1,669,031
Other loans		330		90		3,724		748		4,892		56,787		61,679
Unamortized loan fees and costs		—		—		—		—		—		4,732		4,732
	$	22,312	$	3,034	$	7,775	$	10,356	$	43,477	$	5,443,376	$	5,486,853

* For information on targeted loan review thresholds see “Allowance for Loan Losses”

The scheduled maturities of the direct financing leases reconciled to the total lease receivables in the consolidated balance sheet, are as follows (in thousands):


Remaining 2023	$	48,771
2024		176,589
2025		152,797
2026		92,555
2027		52,873
2028 and thereafter		17,456
Total undiscounted cash flows		541,041
Residual value⁽¹⁾		200,487
Difference between undiscounted cash flows and discounted cash flows		(71,320)
Present value of lease payments recorded as lease receivables	$	670,208

⁽¹⁾Of the $200,487,000, $33,680,000 is not guaranteed by the lessee or other guarantors.

Note 7. Transactions with Affiliates

The Bank ~~maintains~~did not maintain any deposits for various affiliated companies ~~totaling approximately $3.5 million and $5.5 million~~ as of September 30, ~~2017~~2023 and December 31, ~~2016,~~2022, respectively.

The Bank has entered into lending transactions in the ordinary course of business with directors, executive officers, principal stockholders and affiliates of such persons.All loans were made on substantially the same terms, including interest rate and collateral, as those prevailing at the time for comparable loans with persons not related to the ~~Bank.~~lender. At September 30, ~~2017,~~2023, these loans were current as to principal and interest payments and did not involve more than normal risk of collectability. Loans to these related parties ~~included in Loans, net of deferred loan fees and costs,~~ amounted to ~~$1.4~~$4.0 million at September 30, ~~2017~~2023 and ~~$649,000~~$5.5 million at December 31, ~~2016.~~2022.

The Bank periodically purchases securities under agreements to resell and engages in other securities transactions as follows. The Company executed transactions through J.V.B. Financial Group, LLC, (JVB), a broker dealer in which the Company’s Chairman has a minority interest. The Company’s Chairman also serves as Vice Chairman of Institutional Financial Markets Inc., the parent company of JVB. In 2017, the Company purchased $2.8 million of government guaranteed SBA loans from JVB for Community Reinvestment Act purposes. The Company also purchased securities under agreements to resell through JVB primarily consisting of G.N.M.A. certificates which are full faith and credit obligations of the United States government issued at competitive rates. JVB was in compliance with all of the terms of the agreements at September 30, 2017 and had complied with all terms for all prior repurchase agreements. There were $65.1 million and $39.2 million of repurchase agreements outstanding at September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively.

Mr. Hersh Kozlov, a director of the Company, is a partner at Duane Morris LLP, an international law firm. The Company paid Duane Morris LLP ~~$2.5 million~~$164,000 and ~~$2.4~~$1.4 million for legal services for the nine months ended September 30, ~~2017~~2023 and ~~September 30, 2016,~~2022, respectively.

Note 8. Fair Value Measurements

ASC 825, “ Financial Instruments ~~Available for Sale”~~, requires disclosure of the estimated fair value of an entity’s assets and liabilities considered to be financial instruments. For the Company, as for most financial institutions, the majority of its assets and liabilities are considered to be financial instruments. However, many such instruments lack an available trading market as characterized by a willing

buyer and willing seller engaging in an exchange transaction. Accordingly, estimated fair values are determined by the Company using the best available data and an estimation methodology it believes to be suitable for each category of financial instruments. Also, it is the Company’s

general practice and intent to hold its financial instruments to maturity whether or not categorized as ~~“available-for-sale”~~available-for-sale and not to engage in trading or sales activities ~~except for~~although it has sold loans and securities in the ~~sale of commercial loans to secondary markets.~~past and may do so in the future. For fair value disclosure purposes, the Company utilized certain value measurement criteria required ~~under the~~in accordance with ASC 820, ~~“Fair~~Fair Value Measurements and ~~Disclosures”~~Disclosures (“ASC 820”), ~~and~~as discussed below.

Estimated fair values have been determined by the Company using the best available data and an estimation methodology it believes to be suitable for each category of financial instruments. Changes in the assumptions or methodologies used to estimate fair values may materially affect the estimated amounts. Also, there may not be reasonable comparability between institutions due to the wide range of permitted assumptions and methodologies in the absence of active markets. This lack of uniformity gives rise to a high degree of subjectivity in estimating financial instrument fair values.

Cash and cash equivalents, which are comprised of cash and due from banks, the Company’s balance at the Federal Reserve Bank and securities purchased under agreements to resell, had recorded values of $398.9 million and $999.1 million as of September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively, which approximated fair values.

The estimated fair values of investment securities are based on quoted market prices, if available, or estimated using a methodology based on management’s inputs. The fair values of the Company’s investment securities held-to-maturity and loans held for sale are based on using “unobservable inputs” that are the best information available in the circumstances. Level 3 investment securities fair values are based on the present value of cash flows, which discounts expected cash flows from principal and interest using yield to maturity at the measurement date.

FHLB and Atlantic Central Bankers Bank stock is held as required by those respective institutions and is carried at cost. Federal law requires a member institution of the FHLB to hold stock according to predetermined formulas. Atlantic Central Bankers Bank requires its correspondent banking institutions to hold stock as a condition of membership.

~~Commercial loans held for sale have estimated fair values based upon either market indications of the sales price of such loans from recent sales transactions or discounted cash flow analysis.~~

The net loan portfolio at September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 has been valued using the present value of discounted cash flow where market prices were not available. The discount rate used in these calculations is the estimated current market rate adjusted for credit risk. Accrued interest receivable has a carrying value that approximates fair value.

On December 30, 2014, the Bank entered into an agreement for, and closed on, the sale of a portion of its discontinued commercial loan portfolio. The purchaser of the loan portfolio was a newly formed entity, 2014-1 LLC (Walnut Street). The price paid to the Bank for the loan portfolio which had a face value of approximately $267.6 million, was approximately $209.6 million, of which approximately $193.6 million was in the form of two notes issued by Walnut Street to the Bank; a senior note in the principal amount of approximately $178.2 million bearing interest at 1.5% per year and maturing in December 2024 and a subordinate note in the principal amount of approximately $15.4 million, bearing interest at 10.0% per year and maturing in December 2024. The balance of these notes comprises the balance of the investment in unconsolidated entity. The fair value was established by the sales price and subsequently subjected to cash flow analysis. The change in value of investment in unconsolidated entity in the income statement includes interest paid and changes in estimated fair value.

Discontinued assets held for sale as of September 30, 2017 are held at the lower of cost basis or market value. For loans, market value was determined using the income approach which converts expected cash flows from the loan portfolio by unit of measurement to a present value estimate. Unit of measurement was determined by loan type and for significant loans on an individual loan basis. The fair values of the Company’s loans classified as assets held for sale are based on “unobservable inputs” that are the best information available in the circumstances. Level 3 fair values are based on the present value of cash flows by unit of measurement. For commercial loans, a market adjusted rate to discount expected cash flows from outstanding principal and interest to expected maturity at the measurement date was utilized. For other real estate owned, market value was based upon appraisals of the underlying collateral by third party appraisers, reduced by 7% to 10% for estimated selling costs.

~~The estimated fair values of demand deposits~~ (comprising of interest and non-interest bearing checking accounts, savings accounts, and certain types of money market accounts) are equal to the amount payable on demand at the reporting date (generally, their carrying amounts). The fair values of securities sold under agreements to repurchase and short term borrowings are equal to their carrying amounts as they are short term borrowings.

Time deposits and subordinated debentures have a fair value estimated using a discounted cash flow calculation that applies current interest rates to discount expected cash flows. Based upon time deposit maturities at September 30, 2017, the carrying values approximate their fair values. The carrying amount of accrued interest payable approximates its fair value.

The fair values of interest rate swaps are determined using models that use readily observable market inputs and a market standard methodology applied to the contractual terms of the derivatives, including the period to maturity and interest rate indices.

The fair value of commitments to extend credit is estimated based on the amount of unamortized deferred loan commitment fees. The fair value of letters of credit is based on the amount of unearned fees plus the estimated cost to terminate the letters of credit. Fair values of unrecognized financial instruments, including commitments to extend credit, and the fair value of letters of credit are considered immaterial.

~~The following tables provide information regarding carrying amounts and estimated fair values (in thousands~~):

September 30, 2017

Quoted prices in

Significant other

Significant

active markets for

observable

unobservable

Carrying

Estimated

identical assets

inputs

inputs

amount

fair value

(Level 1)

(Level 2)

(Level 3)
Investment securities available-for-sale
$            1,196,956

$               1,196,956

$                            -

$               1,153,403

$                   43,553
Investment securities held-to-maturity
86,402

85,099

-

78,756

6,343
Securities purchased under agreements to resell
65,095

65,095

65,095

-

-
Federal Home Loan Bank and Atlantic Central Bankers Bank stock
991

991

-

-

991
Commercial loans held for sale
380,272

380,272

-

-

380,272
Loans, net of deferred loan fees and costs
1,374,060

1,373,325

-

-

1,373,325
Investment in unconsolidated entity, senior note
103,950

103,950

-

-

103,950
Investment in unconsolidated entity, subordinated note
3,761

3,761

-

-

3,761
Assets held for sale
314,994

314,994

-

-

314,994
Demand and interest checking
3,113,212

3,113,212

3,113,212

-

-
Savings and money market
452,183

452,183

452,183

-

-
Subordinated debentures
13,401

9,873

-

-

9,873
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase
180

180

180

-

-
Interest rate swaps, asset
722

722

-

722

-

December 31, 2016

Quoted prices in

Significant other

Significant

active markets for

observable

unobservable

Carrying

Estimated

identical assets

inputs

inputs

amount

fair value

(Level 1)

(Level 2)

(Level 3)
Investment securities available-for-sale
$            1,248,614

$               1,248,614

$                            -

$               1,248,614

$                           -
Investment securities held-to-maturity
93,467

91,799

-

85,760

6,039
Securities purchased under agreements to resell
39,199

39,199

39,199

-

-
Federal Home Loan Bank and Atlantic Central Bankers Bank stock
1,613

1,613

-

-

1,613
Commercial loans held for sale
663,140

663,140

-

-

663,140
Loans, net of deferred loan fees and costs
1,222,911

1,219,625

-

-

1,219,625
Investment in unconsolidated entity, senior note
118,389

118,389

-

-

118,389
Investment in unconsolidated entity, subordinated note
8,541

8,541

-

-

8,541
Assets held for sale
360,711

360,711

-

-

360,711
Demand and interest checking
3,816,524

3,816,524

3,816,524

-

-
Savings and money market
421,780

421,780

421,780

-

-
Subordinated debentures
13,401

9,290

-

-

9,290
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase
274

274

274

-

-
Interest rate swaps, asset
3,207

3,207

-

3,207

-

~~The assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis, segregated by fair value hierarchy, are summarized below (in thousands):~~

Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using

Quoted prices in active

Significant other

Significant

markets for identical

observable

unobservable

Fair value

assets

inputs

inputs

September 30, 2017

(Level 1)

(Level 2)

(Level 3)

Investment securities available-for-sale

U.S. Government agency securities

$                           35,225

$                                       -

$                             35,225

$                                       -
Asset-backed securities

264,939

-

264,939

-
Obligations of states and political subdivisions

86,432

-

86,432

-
Residential mortgage-backed securities

364,437

-

364,437

-
Collateralized mortgage obligation securities

129,093

-

129,093

-
Commercial mortgage-backed securities

153,648

-

110,095

43,553
Foreign debt securities

59,995

-

59,995

-
Corporate debt securities

103,187

-

103,187

-
Total investment securities available-for-sale

1,196,956

-

1,153,403

43,553
Loans held for sale

380,272

-

-

380,272
Investment in unconsolidated entity, senior note

103,950

-

-

103,950
Investment in unconsolidated entity, subordinated note

3,761

-

-

3,761
Interest rate swaps, asset

722

-

722

-

$                      1,685,661

$                                       -

$                        1,154,125

$                           531,536

Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using

Quoted prices in active

Significant other

Significant

markets for identical

observable

unobservable

Fair value

assets

inputs

inputs

December 31, 2016

(Level 1)

(Level 2)

(Level 3)

Investment securities available-for-sale

U.S. Government agency securities

$                           27,702

$                                       -

$                             27,702

$                                       -
Asset-backed securities

355,396

-

355,396

-
Obligations of states and political subdivisions

94,533

-

94,533

-
Residential mortgage-backed securities

342,569

-

342,569

-
Collateralized mortgage obligation securities

159,823

-

159,823

-
Commercial mortgage-backed securities

117,086

-

117,086

-
Foreign debt securities

56,497

-

56,497

-
Corporate debt securities

95,008

-

95,008

-
Total investment securities available-for-sale

1,248,614

-

1,248,614

-
Loans held for sale

663,140

-

-

663,140
Investment in unconsolidated entity, senior note

118,389

-

-

118,389
Investment in unconsolidated entity, subordinated note

8,541

-

-

8,541
Interest rate swaps, asset

3,207

-

3,207

-

$                      2,041,891

$                                       -

$                        1,251,821

$                           790,070

In addition, ASC 820 ~~“Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures”,~~ establishes a common definition for fair value to be applied to assets and liabilities. It clarifies that fair value is an exit price, representing the amount that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. It also establishes a framework for measuring fair value and expands disclosures concerning fair value measurements. ASC 820 establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value. The hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1 measurements) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3 measurements). Level 1 valuation is based on quoted market prices for identical assets or liabilities to which the Company has access at the measurement date. Level 2 valuation is based on other observable inputs for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. This includes quoted prices for similar assets in active or inactive markets, inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability such as yield curves, volatilities, prepayment speeds, credit risks, default rates, or inputs that are derived principally from, or corroborated through, observable market data by market-corroborated reports. Level 3 valuation is based on “unobservable inputs” which the Company believes is the best information available in the circumstances. A financial instrument’s level within the fair value hierarchy is based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. ~~The changes~~

Changes in the assumptions or methodologies used to estimate fair values may materially affect the estimated amounts. Also, there may not be reasonable comparability between institutions due to the wide range of permitted assumptions and methodologies in the absence of active markets. This lack of uniformity gives rise to a high degree of subjectivity in estimating financial instrument fair values.

Cash and cash equivalents, which are comprised of cash and due from banks and the Company’s balance at the Federal Reserve Bank, had recorded values of $903.4 million and $888.2 million as of September 30, 2023 and December 31, 2022, respectively, which approximated fair values.

The estimated fair values of investment securities are based on quoted market prices, if available, or estimated independently by a third-party pricing service based upon their matrix pricing technique. Level 3 investment security fair values are based on the present valuing of cash flows, which discounts expected cash flows from principal and interest using yield to maturity, or yield to call as appropriate, at the measurement date. In the third quarter of 2023 and 2022, there were no transfers between the three levels.

FHLB stock, ACBB stock and Federal Reserve Bank stock are held as required by those respective institutions and are carried at cost. Each of these institutions require their correspondent banking institutions to hold stock as a condition of membership. While a fixed stock amount is required by each of these institutions, the FHLB stock requirement increases or decreases with the level of borrowing activity.

Commercial loans held at fair value are comprised primarily of commercial real estate bridge loans and SBA loans which had been originated for sale or securitization in the secondary market, and which are now being held on the balance sheet. Commercial real estate bridge loans and SBA loans are valued using a discounted cash flow analysis based upon pricing for similar loans where market indications of the sales price of such loans are not available. SBA loans are valued on a pooled basis and commercial real estate bridge loans are valued individually.

Loans, net have an estimated fair value using the present value of future cash flows. The discount rate used in these calculations is the estimated current market rate adjusted for credit risk. Accrued interest receivable has a carrying value that approximates fair value.

Loan fair values are based on “unobservable inputs” that are based on available information. Level 3 fair values are based on the present value of cash flows by unit of measurement. In the first quarter of 2022, discontinued loans were reclassified to loans held for investment, as efforts to sell the loans had concluded. Accordingly, these loans are accounted for as such, and included in related tables. Discontinued OREO, which constituted the remainder of discontinued assets, was reclassified to the OREO caption on the consolidated balance sheet.

For OREO, market value is based upon appraisals of the underlying collateral by third-party appraisers, reduced by 7% to 10% for estimated selling costs.

The estimated fair values of demand deposits (comprised of interest and non-interest bearing checking accounts, savings accounts, and certain types of money market accounts) are equal to the amount payable on demand at the reporting date (generally, their carrying amounts). The fair values of securities sold under agreements to repurchase and short-term borrowings, when outstanding, are equal to their carrying amounts as they are short-term borrowings.

Time deposits, when outstanding, senior debt and subordinated debentures have a fair value estimated using a discounted cash flow calculation that applies current interest rates to discount expected cash flows. The carrying amount of accrued interest payable approximates its fair value. Long term borrowings resulting from sold loans which did not qualify for true sale accounting are presented in the amount of the principal of such loans.

The fair values of interest rate swaps, recorded in other assets or other liabilities, are determined using models that use readily observable market inputs and a market standard methodology applied to the contractual terms of the derivatives, including the period to maturity and interest rate indices.

The following tables provide information regarding carrying amounts and estimated fair values (in thousands) as of the dates indicated:



	September 30, 2023
					Quoted prices in		Significant other		Significant
					active markets for		observable		unobservable
	Carrying		Estimated		identical assets		inputs		inputs
	amount		fair value		(Level 1)		(Level 2)		(Level 3)
Investment securities, available-for-sale	$	756,636	$	756,636	$	—	$	738,033	$	18,603
FHLB, ACBB, and Federal Reserve Bank stock		20,157		20,157		—		—		20,157
Commercial loans, at fair value		379,603		379,603		—		—		379,603
Loans, net of deferred loan fees and costs		5,198,972		5,156,653		—		—		5,156,653
Interest rate swaps, asset		427		427		—		427		—
Demand and interest checking		6,455,043		6,455,043		—		6,455,043		—
Savings and money market		49,428		49,428		—		49,428		—
Senior debt		95,771		93,765		—		93,765		—
Subordinated debentures		13,401		10,583		—		—		10,583
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase		42		42		42		—		—



	December 31, 2022
					Quoted prices in		Significant other		Significant
					active markets for		observable		unobservable
	Carrying		Estimated		identical assets		inputs		inputs
	amount		fair value		(Level 1)		(Level 2)		(Level 3)
Investment securities, available-for-sale	$	766,016	$	766,016	$	—	$	745,993	$	20,023
FHLB, ACBB, and Federal Reserve Bank stock		12,629		12,629		—		—		12,629
Commercial loans, at fair value		589,143		589,143		—		—		589,143
Loans, net of deferred loan fees and costs		5,486,853		5,462,948		—		—		5,462,948
Interest rate swaps, asset		408		408		—		408		—
Demand and interest checking		6,559,617		6,559,617		—		6,559,617		—
Savings and money market		140,496		140,496		—		140,496		—
Time deposits		330,000		330,000		—		330,000		—
Senior debt		99,050		93,871		—		93,871		—
Subordinated debentures		13,401		10,067		—		—		10,067
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase		42		42		42		—		—

Other assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis, segregated by fair value hierarchy, ~~level,~~are summarized below (in thousands) as of the dates indicated:



			Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using
			Quoted prices in		Significant other		Significant
				active markets for	observable		unobservable
	Fair value		identical assets		inputs		inputs
		September 30, 2023	(Level 1)		(Level 2)		(Level 3)
Investment securities, available-for-sale
U.S. Government agency securities	$	33,027	$	—	$	33,027	$	—
Asset-backed securities		331,498		—		331,498		—
Obligations of states and political subdivisions		46,350		—		46,350		—
Residential mortgage-backed securities		160,041		—		160,041		—
Collateralized mortgage obligation securities		35,592		—		35,592		—
Commercial mortgage-backed securities		143,848		—		131,525		12,323
Corporate debt securities		6,280		—		—		6,280
Total investment securities, available-for-sale		756,636		—		738,033		18,603
Commercial loans, at fair value		379,603		—		—		379,603
Interest rate swaps, asset		427		—		427		—
	$	1,136,666	$	—	$	738,460	$	398,206



			Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using
			Quoted prices in		Significant other		Significant
				active markets for	observable		unobservable
	Fair value		identical assets		inputs		inputs
		December 31, 2022	(Level 1)		(Level 2)		(Level 3)
Investment securities, available-for-sale
U.S. Government agency securities	$	28,381	$	—	$	28,381	$	—
Asset-backed securities		334,009		—		334,009		—
Obligations of states and political subdivisions		47,510		—		47,510		—
Residential mortgage-backed securities		139,820		—		139,820		—
Collateralized mortgage obligation securities		41,783		—		41,783		—
Commercial mortgage-backed securities		166,813		—		154,490		12,323
Corporate debt securities		7,700		—		—		7,700
Total investment securities, available-for-sale		766,016		—		745,993		20,023
Commercial loans, at fair value		589,143		—		—		589,143
Interest rate swaps, asset		408		—		408		—
	$	1,355,567	$	—	$	746,401	$	609,166

The Company’s Level 3 asset activity for the categories shown are summarized below (in thousands):



	Fair Value Measurements Using
	Significant Unobservable Inputs
	(Level 3)

	Available-for-sale					Commercial loans,
	securities					at fair value
	September 30, 2023			December 31, 2022		September 30, 2023		December 31, 2022
Beginning balance	$	20,023		$	19,031	$	589,143	$	1,388,416
Transfers to OREO		—			—		(737)		(61,580)
Total net gains (losses) (realized/unrealized)
Included in earnings		—			—		4,152		12,570
Included in other comprehensive income		(1,420)			992		—		—
Purchases, issuances, sales and settlements
Issuances		—			—		105,192		66,067
Settlements		—			—		(318,147)		(816,330)
Ending balance	$	18,603		$	20,023	$	379,603	$	589,143

Total losses year to date included
in earnings attributable to the change in
unrealized gains or losses relating to assets still
held at the reporting date as shown above.	$	(1,420	)	$	—	$	(1,323)	$	(3,492)

The Company’s Level 3 asset activity for the categories shown are summarized below (in thousands):

Fair Value Measurements Using

Significant Unobservable Inputs

(Level 3)

Available-for-sale

Commercial loans

securities

held for sale

September 30, 2017

December 31, 2016

September 30, 2017

December 31, 2016
Beginning balance

$                                   -

$                                       -

$                           663,140

$                           489,938
Transfers into level 3

-

-

-

-
Transfers out of level 3

-

-

-

-
Total gains or losses (realized/unrealized)

Included in earnings

-

-

20,019

(3,078)
Included in other comprehensive income

-

-

-

-
Purchases, issuances, and settlements

Purchases

43,553

Issuances

-

-

398,410

528,584
Sales

-

-

(701,297)

(352,304)
Settlements

-

-

-

-
Ending balance

$                          43,553

$                                       -

$                           380,272

$                           663,140

The amount of total gains or (losses) for the period

included in earnings attributable to the change in

unrealized gains or losses relating to assets still

held at the reporting date.

$                                   -

$                                       -

$                                  703

$                             (2,674)


	Fair Value Measurements Using
	Significant Unobservable Inputs
	(Level 3)

	Assets held-for-sale
	from discontinued operations
	September 30, 2023		December 31, 2022
Beginning balance	$	—	$	3,268
Settlements		—		(3,268)
Ending balance	$	—	$	—

Total losses year to date included
in earnings attributable to the change in
unrealized gains or losses relating to assets still
held at the reporting date as shown above.	$	—	$	—

The Company’s OREO activity is summarized below (in thousands) as of the dates indicated:

Fair Value Measurements Using

Significant Unobservable Inputs

(Level 3)

Investment in

Assets

unconsolidated entity

held for sale

September 30, 2017

December 31, 2016

September 30, 2017

December 31, 2016
Beginning balance

$                         126,930

$                             178,520

$                             360,711

$                             583,909
Transfers into level 3

-

-

-

-
Transfers out of level 3

-

-

-

-
Total gains or losses (realized/unrealized)

Included in earnings

(20)

(39,816)

638

(48,836)
Included in other comprehensive income

-

-

-

-
Purchases, issuances, and settlements

Purchases

-

-

-

-
Issuances

-

-

-

-
Sales

-

-

-

(63,712)
Settlements

(19,199)

(11,774)

(33,400)

(110,650)
Charge-offs

-

-

(12,955)

-
Ending balance

$                         107,711

$                             126,930

$                             314,994

$                             360,711

The amount of total gains or (losses) for the period

included in earnings attributable to the change in

unrealized gains or losses relating to assets still

held at the reporting date.

$                               (20)

$                             (39,816)

$                               (1,776)

$                             (48,836)


	September 30, 2023		December 31, 2022
Beginning balance	$	21,210	$	18,873
Transfer from commercial loans, at fair value		737		—
Writedowns		(1,147)		—
Sales		(2,044)		(2,343)
Transfers from commercial loans, at fair value		—		4,680
Ending balance	$	18,756	$	21,210

Information related to fair values of Level 3 balance sheet categories is as follows (dollars in thousands):

Level 3 instruments only

Weighted

Fair value at

Range at

average at

September 30, 2023

Valuation techniques

Unobservable inputs

September 30, 2023

Commercial mortgage-backed investment

security⁽¹⁾

12,323

Discounted cash flow

Discount rate

13.20%

Insurance liquidating trust preferred security⁽²⁾

6,280

Discounted cash flow

Discount rate

15.50%

FHLB, ACBB,

and Federal Reserve Bank stock

20,157

Cost

N/A

Loans, net of deferred loan fees and costs⁽³⁾

5,156,653

Discounted cash flow

Discount rate

7.40%-13.00%

8.43%

Commercial - SBA⁽⁴⁾

126,543

Discounted cash flow

Discount rate

7.32%

Non-SBA commercial real estate - fixed⁽⁵⁾

124,802

Discounted cash flow

Discount rate

8.58%-12.72%

8.95%

Non-SBA commercial real estate - floating⁽⁶⁾

128,258

Discounted cash flow

Discount rate

9.80%-17.30%

14.02%

Commercial loans, at fair value

379,603

Subordinated debentures⁽⁷⁾

10,583

Discounted cash flow

Discount rate

12.00%

OREO⁽⁸⁾

18,756

Appraised value

N/A


		Level 3 instruments only
						Weighted
	Fair value at				Range at	average at
	December 31, 2022		Valuation techniques	Unobservable inputs	December 31, 2022	December 31, 2022
Commercial mortgage-backed investment
security	$	12,323	Discounted cash flow	Discount rate	12.71%	12.71%
Insurance liquidating trust preferred security		7,700	Discounted cash flow	Discount rate	11.50%	11.50%
FHLB, ACBB,
and Federal Reserve Bank stock		12,629	Cost	N/A	N/A	N/A
Loans, net of deferred loan fees and costs		5,462,948	Discounted cash flow	Discount rate	5.65% - 11.00%	6.86%

Commercial - SBA		146,717	Discounted cash flow	Discount rate	5.57%-6.25%	6.17%
Non-SBA commercial real estate - fixed		28,695	Discounted cash flow and appraisal	Discount rate	8.36%-11.65%	10.31%
Non-SBA commercial real estate - floating		413,731	Discounted cash flow	Discount rate	7.07%-17.20%	7.90%
Commercial loans, at fair value		589,143

Subordinated debentures		10,067	Discounted cash flow	Discount rate	11.50%	11.50%

OREO		21,210	Appraised value	N/A	N/A	N/A

The valuations for each of the instruments above, as of the balance sheet date, are subject to judgments, assumptions and uncertainties, changes in which could have a significant impact on such valuations. Weighted averages were calculated by using the discount rate for each individual security or loan weighted by its market value, except for SBA loans. For SBA loans, the yield derived from market pricing indications for comparable pools determined by date of loan origination. For commercial loans recorded at fair value, changes in fair value are reflected in the income statement. Changes in the fair value of securities which are unrelated to credit are recorded through equity. Changes in the fair value of loans recorded at amortized cost which are unrelated to credit are a disclosure item, without impact on the financial statements. The notes below refer to the September 30, 2023 table.

Fair value at

Fair value at

Level 3 instruments only

September 30, 2017

December 31, 2016

Valuation techniques

Unobservable inputs

Range

Investment securities available-for-sale

$                         43,553

$     ��                           -

Discounted cash flow

Discount rate

7.0%-9.5%
Investment securities held-to-maturity

6,343

6,039

Discounted cash flow

Discount rate

8.00%
Federal Home Loan Bank and Atlantic

991

1,613

Cost

N/A

N/A
  Central Bankers Bank stock

Loans, net of deferred loan fees and costs

1,373,325

1,219,625

Discounted cash flow

Discount rate

3.5%-7.2%
Commercial loans held for sale

380,272

663,140

Discounted cash flow

Discount rate

4.85%-7.05%
Investment in unconsolidated entity,

103,950

118,389

Discounted cash flow

Discount rate

4.75%
senior note

Default rate

1.00%
Investment in unconsolidated entity,

3,761

8,541

Discounted cash flow

Discount rate

11.00%
subordinated note

Default rate

1.00%
Assets held for sale

314,994

360,711

Discounted cash flow

Discount rate

3.67%-9.32%
Subordinated debentures

9,873

9,290

Discounted cash flow

Discount rate

7.00%

⁽¹⁾Commercial mortgage-backed investment security, consisting of a single Bank-issued CRE security, is valued using discounted cash flow analysis. The discount rate and prepayment rate applied are based upon market observations and actual experience for comparable securities and implicitly assume market averages for defaults and loss severities. The CRE-2 security has significant credit enhancement, or protection from other tranches in the issue, which limits the valuation exposure to credit losses. Nonetheless, increases in expected default rates or loss severities on the loans underlying the issue could reduce its value. In market environments in which investors demand greater yield compensation for credit risk, the discount rate applied would ordinarily be higher and the valuation lower. Changes in prepayments and loss experience could also change the interest earned on this holding in future periods and impact its fair value. As a single security, the weighted average rate shown is the actual rate applied to the CRE-2 security. For additional information related to this security, see Note 6. Loans.

⁽²⁾Insurance liquidating trust preferred security is a single debenture which is valued using discounted cash flow analysis. The discount rate used is based on the market rate on comparable relatively illiquid instruments and credit analysis. A change in the liquidating trust’s ability to repay the note, or an increase in interest rates, particularly for privately placed debentures, would affect the discount rate and thus the valuation. As a single security, the weighted average rate shown is the actual rate applied to the security. The security was issued by an aggregator of insurance lines in run-off, including workmen’s compensation lines. In the third quarter of 2023, the Company was notified that interest payments were being deferred on the security, as permitted under the terms of the trust preferred indenture which permits such deferrals for up to twenty consecutive quarters. At the end of the deferral, deferred interest must be repaid, including interest on the deferred interest. The Company has requested additional updated financial information from the aggregator to permit a more accurate valuation of the security subsequent to the interest deferral. The aggregator has indicated that it is attempting to identify all holders of the security and that it intends to provide such financial information concurrently to all holders. The Company has placed the security in non-accrual status and will evaluate the security for potential loss in the fourth quarter of 2023, when the aggregator indicated that the financial information would be distributed. While the security has previously been subject to interest deferral which was repaid, there can be no assurance that repayment will occur for the current deferral. Further, depending upon the financial information provided by the aggregator, a loss of up to the full amount of principal, or $10.0 million, may be recognized in the fourth quarter of 2023.

⁽³⁾Loans, net of deferred loan fees and costs are valued using discounted cash flow analysis. Discount rates are based upon available information for estimated current origination rates for each loan type. Origination rates may fluctuate based upon changes in the risk free (Treasury) rate and credit experience for each loan type.

⁽⁴⁾Commercial – SBA Loans are comprised of the government guaranteed portion of SBA-insured loans. Their valuation is based upon the yield derived from dealer pricing indications for guaranteed pools, adjusted for seasoning and prepayments. A limited number of broker/dealers originate the pooled securities for which the loans are purchased and as a result, prices can fluctuate based on such limited market demand, although the government guarantee has resulted in consistent historical demand. Valuations are impacted by prepayment assumptions resulting from both voluntary payoffs and defaults. Such assumptions for these seasoned loans are based on a seasoning vector for constant prepayment rates from 3% to 30% over life.

⁽⁵⁾Non-SBA commercial real estate – fixed are fixed rate non-SBA commercial real estate mortgages. These loans are fair valued by a third party, based upon discounting at market rates for similar loans. Discount rates used in applying discounted cash flow analysis utilize input based upon loan terms, the general level of interest rates and the quality of the credit. Deterioration in loan performance or other credit weaknesses could result in fair value ranges which would be dependent upon potential buyers’ tolerance for such weaknesses and are difficult to estimate.

⁽⁶⁾Non-SBA commercial real estate – floating are floating rate non-SBA loans, the vast majority of which are secured by multi-family properties (apartments). These are bridge loans designed to provide owners time and funding for property improvements and are generally valued using discounted cash flow analysis. The discount rate for the vast majority of these loans was based upon current origination rates for similar loans. Deterioration in loan performance or other credit weaknesses could result in fair value ranges which would be dependent upon potential buyers’ tolerance for such weaknesses and are difficult to estimate. At September 30, 2023, these loans were fair valued by a third party, based upon discounting at market rates for similar loans.

⁽⁷⁾Subordinated debentures are comprised of two subordinated notes issued by the Company, maturing in 2038 with a floating rate originally indexed to three-month London Inter-Bank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) plus 3.25%. In the second quarter of 2023, the index was changed to secured overnight financing rate (“SOFR”) as part of the market-wide LIBOR transition. These notes are valued using discounted cash flow analysis. The discount rate is based on the market rate for comparable relatively illiquid instruments. Changes in those market rates, or the credit of the Company, could result in changes in valuation.

⁽⁸⁾For OREO, fair value is based upon appraisals of the underlying collateral by third party appraisers, reduced by 7% to 10% for estimated selling costs. Such appraisals reflect estimates of amounts realizable upon property sales based on the sale of comparable properties and other factors. Actual sales prices may vary based upon the identification of potential purchasers, changing conditions in local real estate markets and the level of interest rates required to finance purchases.

Assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis, segregated by fair value hierarchy, during the periods shown are summarized below (in thousands):



		Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using					Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using
		Quoted prices in active	Significant other	Significant			Quoted prices in active		Significant other		Significant
		markets for identical	observable	unobservable			markets for identical		observable		unobservable
	Fair value	assets	inputs	inputs	Fair value		assets		inputs		inputs⁽¹⁾
Description ~~(1)~~	September 30, 2017	(Level 1)	(Level 2)	(Level 3)	September 30, 2023		(Level 1)		(Level 2)		(Level 3)

Impaired loans - collateral dependent	$ 4,011	$ -	$ -	$ 4,011
Other real estate owned	-	-	-	-
Collateral dependent loans⁽¹⁾					$	13,581	$	—	$	—	$	13,581
OREO						18,756		—		—		18,756
Intangible assets	5,185	-	-	5,185		1,751		—		—		1,751
	$ 9,196	$ -	$ -	$ 9,196	$	34,088	$	—	$	—	$	34,088



		Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using					Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using
		Quoted prices in active	Significant other	Significant			Quoted prices in active		Significant other		Significant
		markets for identical	observable	unobservable			markets for identical		observable		unobservable
	Fair value	assets	inputs	inputs	Fair value		assets		inputs		inputs⁽¹⁾
Description ~~(1)~~	December 31, 2016	(Level 1)	(Level 2)	(Level 3)	December 31, 2022		(Level 1)		(Level 2)		(Level 3)

Impaired loans - collateral dependent	$ 3,685	$ -	$ -	3,685
Other real estate owned	104	-	-	104
Collateral dependent loans⁽¹⁾					$	12,205	$	—	$	—	$	12,205
OREO						21,210		—		—		21,210
Intangible assets	6,906	-	-	6,906		2,049		—		—		2,049
	$ 10,695	$ -	$ -	$ 10,695	$	35,464	$	—	$	—	$	35,464

~~(1)~~

The method of valuation approach for the impaired loans was the market value approach based upon appraisals of the underlying collateral by external appraisers, reduced by 7% to 10% for estimated selling costs. Intangible assets are valued based upon internal analyses.

⁽¹⁾The method of valuation approach for the loans evaluated for an allowance for credit losses on an individual loan basis and also for OREO was the market approach based upon appraisals of the underlying collateral by external appraisers, reduced by 7% to 10% for estimated selling costs. Intangible assets are valued based upon internal analyses.

At September 30, ~~2017,~~2023, principal on ~~impaired~~collateral dependent loans and troubled debt restructurings, ~~that~~which is accounted for on the basis of the value of underlying collateral, is shown at estimated fair value of ~~$4.0~~$13.6 million. To arrive at that fair value, related loan principal of ~~$5.8~~$15.4 million was reduced by specific reserves of $1.8 million within the ~~allowance for loan losses~~ACL as of that date, representing the deficiency between principal and estimated collateral values, which were reduced by estimated costs to sell. When the deficiency is deemed uncollectible, it is charged off by reducing the specific reserve and decreasing principal. Included in the ~~impaired balance~~collateral dependent loans at September 30, ~~2017~~2023 were ~~seven~~nine troubled debt restructured loans with a balance of ~~$1.8~~$5.2 million, which had specific reserves of ~~$534,000.~~ $579,000. Included in the

collateral dependent loans at December 31, 2022, were eleven troubled debt restructured loans with a balance of $5.3 million which had specific allowances of $637,000. Under the new accounting guidance effective January 1, 2023, which broadened the reporting of loan restructurings to include all modifications, there was one $156,000 loan classified as modified as of September 30, 2023. There was no specific reserve on that loan.Valuation techniques consistent with the market and/or cost approach were used to measure fair value and primarily included observable inputs for the individual

~~impaired~~ collateral dependent loans being evaluated such as recent sales of similar assets or observable market data for operational or carrying costs. In cases where such inputs were unobservable, the loan balance is reflected within the Level 3 hierarchy. ~~The fair value of other real estate owned is based on an appraisal of the property using the market approach for valuation.~~

Note 9. Derivatives

The Company utilizes derivative instruments to assist in the management of interest rate sensitivity by modifying the repricing, maturity and option characteristics on certain non-SBA commercial ~~real~~ estate loans held ~~for sale.~~at fair value. These instruments are not accounted for as effective hedges. As of September 30, ~~2017,~~2023, the Company had entered into ~~eleven~~one interest rate swap ~~agreements~~agreement with an aggregate notional amount of ~~$59.7~~$6.8 million. ~~These~~Under that swap ~~agreements provide for~~agreement the Company ~~to receive~~receives an adjustable rate of interest based upon ~~the three-month London Interbank Offering Rate (LIBOR).~~ SOFR. The Company recorded a ~~loss~~net gain of ~~$2.5 million~~$18,000 for the nine months ended September 30, ~~2017~~2023 to recognize the fair value of the derivative ~~instruments~~instrument which is reported in ~~gain (loss)~~net realized and unrealized gains (losses) on ~~sale~~commercial loans, at fair value, in the consolidated statements of ~~loans.~~operations. The amount receivable by the Company under ~~these~~this swap ~~agreements~~agreement was ~~$722,000~~$427,000 at September 30, ~~2017~~2023, which is reported in other assets. The Company had minimum collateral posting thresholds with certain of its derivative counterparties and had posted cash collateral of ~~$756,000~~$541,000 as of September 30, ~~2017.~~2023.

The maturity ~~dates,~~date, notional ~~amounts,~~amount, interest ~~rates~~rate paid and received and fair value of the Company’s remaining interest rate swap ~~agreements~~agreement as of September 30, ~~2017 are~~2023 is summarized below (dollars in thousands):

September 30, 2017
Maturity date

Notional amount

Interest rate paid

Interest rate received

Fair value
August 4, 2021

$                  10,300

1.12%

1.31%

$              306
August 17, 2025

2,500

2.27%

1.31%

(15)
August 17, 2025

2,500

2.27%

1.31%

(15)
December 11, 2025

2,400

2.14%

1.32%

13
December 23, 2025

6,800

2.16%

1.33%

27
December 24, 2025

8,200

2.17%

1.33%

22
January 28, 2026

3,000

1.87%

1.31%

79
July 20, 2026

6,300

1.44%

1.31%

405
December 12, 2026

3,200

2.26%

1.31%

(2)
January 4, 2027

10,100

2.35%

1.30%

(79)
April 27, 2027

4,400

2.32%

1.32%

(19)
Total

$                  59,700

$              722



	September 30, 2023
Maturity date	Notional amount		Interest rate paid		Interest rate received		Fair value
December 23, 2025		6,800		2.16%		5.66%		427
Total	$	6,800					$	427

Note 10. Other Identifiable Intangible Assets

On November 29, 2012, the Company acquired certain software rights for approximately $1.8 million for use in managing prepaid cards in connection with an acquisition. The software is being amortized over eight years. Amortization expense is $217,000 per year ($610,000 over the remainder of the amortization period). The gross carrying amount of the software is $1.8 million, and as of September 30, 2017, the accumulated amortization was $1.3 million.

The Company accounts for its prepaid card customer list in accordance with ASC 350, “Intangibles-Goodwill and Other”. The acquisition of the Stored Value Solutions division of Marshall Bank First in 2007 resulted in a customer list intangible of $12.0 million which is being amortized over a 12 year period. Amortization expense is $1.0 million per year ($2.3 million over the remainder of the amortization period). The gross carrying amount of the customer list intangible is $12.0 million, and as of September 30, 2017, the accumulated amortization was $~~9.8~~ ~~million. For both 2017 and 2016, amortization expense for the first nine months was $750,000.~~

In May 2016, the Company purchased approximately ~~$60~~$60.0 million of lease receivables which resulted in a customer list intangible of $3.4 million ~~which~~that is being amortized over a 10ten year period. Amortization expense is $340,000 per year ($~~1.7 million~~900,000 over the next ~~five~~three years). The gross carrying amount of the customer list intangible is $3.4 million, and as of September 30, ~~2017,~~2023, and December 31, 2022, respectively, the accumulated amortization expense was ~~$471,000.~~$2.5 million and $2.3 million.

In January 2020, the Company purchased McMahon Leasing and subsidiaries for approximately $8.7 million which resulted in $1.1 million of intangibles. The gross carrying value of $1.1 million of intangibles was comprised of a customer list intangible of $689,000, goodwill of $263,000 and a trade name valuation of $135,000. The customer list intangible is being amortized over a twelve year period and accumulated amortization expensewas $215,000 at September 30, 2023 and $172,000 at December 31, 2022. Amortization expense is $57,000 per year ($287,000 over the next five years).The gross carrying value and accumulated amortization related to the Company’s intangibles at September 30, 2023 and December 31, 2022 are presented below:


		September 30,				December 31,
		2023				2022
		Gross				Gross
		Carrying		Accumulated		Carrying		Accumulated
		Amount		Amortization		Amount		Amortization
		(Dollars in thousands)

Customer list intangibles	$	4,093	$	2,740	$	4,093	$	2,442
Goodwill		263		—		263		—
Trade Name		135		—		135		—
Total	$	4,491	$	2,740	$	4,491	$	2,442

Note 11. Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In ~~May 2014,~~March 2020, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update ~~(ASU) 2014-09, “Revenue~~(“ASU”) 2020-04, Reference Rate Reform (Topic 848): Facilitation of the Effects of Reference Rate Reform in Financial Reporting, which addressed optional expedients and exceptions for applying GAAP to contract modifications and hedging relationships, resulting from ~~Contracts with Customers”. This ASU establishes a comprehensive revenue recognition standard for virtually~~the phase-out of the LIBOR reference rate. The Company discontinued LIBOR-based originations in 2021. Since then, all ~~industries utilizing U.S. GAAP, including those that~~

~~previously followed industry-specific guidance such as the real estate and construction industries. The revenue standard’s core principle is built~~LIBOR based instruments on the ~~contract between a vendor and a customer for the provision of goods and services. It attempts~~balance sheet have been successfully transitioned to depict the exchange of rights and obligations between the parties in the pattern of revenue recognition based on the consideration to which the vendor is entitled. To accomplish this, the standard requires five basic steps: (i) identify the contractalternative indices with the customer, (ii) identify the performance obligations in the contract, (iii) identify the transaction price, (iv) allocate the transaction price to the performance obligations in the contract, and (v) recognize revenue when (or as) the entity satisfies the performance obligation. Three basic transition methods are available - full retrospective, retrospective with certain practical expedients, and a cumulative effect approach. We plan to adopt the standard using the cumulative effect approach. Under the cumulative effect alternative, an entity would apply the new revenue standard only to contracts that are incomplete under legacy U.S. GAAP at the date of initial application and recognize the cumulative effect of the new standard as an adjustment to the opening balance of retained earnings. The guidance in this ASU is effective for annual periods and interim reporting periods within those annual periods, beginning after December 15, 2017. Since the standard does not apply to revenue from loans, securities and other financial instruments, based on our evaluation to date, we do not expect the adoption of this standard to have a significant impact on our consolidated results of operations or our consolidated financial position. We are still evaluating the presentation of certain in-scope revenue on the income statement related to our payments business. We have commenced a contract review for those in-scope revenue streams. The Company’s contracts with its various third parties generally do not entail significant amounts of deferred revenues. Instead, services are performed monthly and amounts are billed either monthly or quarterly. Nonetheless, the Company is in process of conducting a review of its contracts and sources of income to ascertain that the standard will not have ano material impact on the consolidated statement of operations or financial position. The review will include the non interest income producing categories of the Company which include prepaid cards, merchant acquiring, ACH, service fees on deposit accounts, gains and losses on other real estate owned, gains and losses on the sale of loans and other categories. impact.

In ~~August 2014,~~March 2022, the FASB issued ASU ~~2014-14, “Receivables -~~2022-02, Financial Instruments-Credit Losses(Topic 326), Troubled Debt Restructurings and Vintage Disclosures. ASU 2022-02 addresses areas identified by ~~Creditors (Subtopic 310-40): Classification~~the FASB as part of ~~Certain Government-Guaranteed Mortgage Loans upon Foreclosure”.~~its post-implementation review of the credit losses standard (ASU 2016-13) that introduced the CECL model. The amendments eliminate the accounting guidance ~~in this ASU affects~~for troubled debt restructurings by creditors that ~~hold government-guaranteed mortgage~~have adopted the CECL model and enhance the disclosure requirements for loan refinancings and modifications. The Company adopted ASU 2022-02 on January 1, 2023. Effective January 1, 2023, loan modifications to borrowers experiencing financial difficulty are required to be disclosed by type of modification and by type of loan. Prior accounting guidance classified loans including those guaranteed by the Federal Home Administration (FHA) and the Veterans Administration (VA). It requires that a mortgage loan be derecognized and a separate other receivable be recognized upon foreclosurewhich were modified as troubled debt restructurings only if the ~~following conditions~~modification reflected a concession from the lender in the form of a below market interest rate or other concession in addition to borrower financial difficulty. Under the new guidance, loans with modifications are ~~met:~~being reported whether a concession is made or not.

~~The loan has a government guarantee that is not separable from the loan before foreclosure.~~

At the time of foreclosure, the creditor has the intent to convey the real estate property to the guarantor and make a claim on the guarantee, and the creditor has the ability to recover under the claim.

~~At the time of foreclosure, any amount of the claim that is determined on the basis of the fair value of the real estate is fixed.~~

~~This standard did not have~~Note 12. Shareholders’ Equity

On October 20, 2021, the Board approved a ~~significant impact on our consolidated results of operations or our consolidated financial position.~~

~~In January 2016,~~common stock repurchase program for the ~~FASB issued ASU 2016-11, “Financial Instruments-Overall (Subtopic 825-10) Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities”~~2022 fiscal year (the “2022 Repurchase Program”).~~This ASU revises an entity’s accounting related to~~Under the ~~classification and measurement of investments~~2022 Repurchase Program, the Company repurchased $15.0 million in ~~equity securities and the presentation of certain fair value changes for financial liabilities measured at fair value. It also amends certain disclosure requirements associated with the fair~~ value of ~~financial instruments. For public business entities,~~ the ~~amendments~~Company’s common stock in ~~this update~~each quarter of 2022.

On October 26, 2022, the Board approved a common stock repurchase program for the 2023 fiscal year (the “2023 Repurchase Program”), which authorizes the Company to repurchase $25.0 million in value of the Company’s common stock per fiscal quarter in 2023, for a maximum amount of $100.0 million. Under the 2023 Repurchase Program, the Company intends to repurchase shares through open market purchases, privately negotiated transactions, block purchases or otherwise in accordance with applicable federal securities laws, including Rule 10b-18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). The 2023 Repurchase Program may be modified or terminated at any time.During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2023, the Company repurchased 685,478 shares and 2,292,647 shares of its common stock in the open market under the 2023 Repurchase Program at an average price of $36.47 per share and $32.71 per share, respectively.

On October 26, 2023, the Board approved a common stock repurchase program for the 2024 fiscal year (the “2024 Repurchase Program”), which authorizes the Company to repurchase $50.0 million in value of the Company’s common stock per fiscal quarter in 2024, for a maximum amount of $200.0 million. Under the 2024 Repurchase Program, the Company intends to repurchase shares through open market purchases, privately negotiated transactions, block purchases or otherwise in accordance with applicable federal securities laws, including Rule 10b-18 of the Exchange Act. The 2024 Repurchase Program may be modified or terminated at any time.

As a means of returning capital to shareholders, the Company implemented stock repurchase programs which totaled $40.0 million, $60.0 million and $100.0 million, respectively, in 2021, 2022 and 2023, with $200 million planned for 2024. The planned amounts of such repurchases are ~~effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within those fiscal years.~~ ~~The Company is currently~~determined in the fourth quarter of the preceding year by assessing the impact ~~that~~of budgetary earnings projections on regulatory capital requirements. The excess of projected earnings over amounts required to maintain capital requirements is the ~~adoption~~maximum available for capital return to shareholders, barring any need to retain capital for other purposes. A significant portion of ~~this standard will~~such excess earnings has been utilized for stock repurchases in the amounts noted above, while cash dividends have not been paid. In determining whether capital is returned through stock repurchases or cash dividends, the Company calculates a maximum share repurchase price, based upon comparisons with what it concludes to be other exemplar peer share price valuations, with further consideration of internal growth projections. As these share prices, which are updated at least annually, have not been reached, capital return has consisted solely of stock repurchases. Exemplar share price comparisons are based upon multiples of earnings per share over time, with further consideration of returns on equity and assets. While repurchase amounts are planned in the ~~financial condition and results of operations~~fourth quarter of the ~~Company.~~preceding year, repurchases may be modified or terminated at any time, should capital need to be conserved.

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, “Leases”. The FASB issued this ASU to increase transparency and comparability among organizations by recognizing lease assets and lease liabilities on the balance sheet by lessees for those leases classified as operating leases under current U.S. GAAP and disclosing key information~~about leasing arrangements. The amendments in this ASU~~are effective for annual periods, and interim periods within those annual periods, beginning after December 15, 2018. Early application of this ASU is permitted for all entities. The Company is currently assessing the impact that the adoption of this standard will have on the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

~~In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-09, “Compensation-Stock Compensation: Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting”.~~ This ASU simplifies several areas of accounting for share based payment award transactions, including the income tax consequences, classification of awards as either equity or liabilities, and the classification on the statement of cash flows. For public companies, this is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016, and the interim periods within those annual periods. The Company adopted the guidance in the first quarter of 2017, and the adoption did not have a material impact on first quarter results.

~~In September 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-13, “Financial Instruments – Credit Losses (Topic 326):Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments-Update”~~. The Update changes the accounting for credit losses on loans and debt securities. For loans and held-to-maturity debt securities, the Update requires an expected credit loss model to determine the allowance for credit losses. The expected credit loss model estimates losses for the estimated life of the financial asset. E~~xpected credit losses reflect losses over the remaining contractual life of an asset, considering the effect of voluntary prepayments and considering available information about the collectability~~

of cash flows, including information about past events, current conditions, and reasonable and supportable forecasts. The resulting allowance for credit losses reflects the portion of the amortized cost basis that the entity does not expect to collect. Additional quantitative and qualitative disclosures are required upon adoption. In addition, the Update modifies the other-than-temporary impairment model for available-for-sale debt securities to require an allowance for credit impairment instead of a direct write-down, which allows for reversal of credit impairments in future periods. The guidance is effective in the first quarter of 2020 with a cumulative-effect adjustment to retained earnings as of the beginning of the year of adoption. Early adoption is permitted beginning in the first quarter of 2019. The Company is evaluating the impact the Update will have on the consolidated financial statements.

Note ~~12.~~13. Regulatory Matters

It is the policy of the Federal Reserve that financial holding companies should pay cash dividends on common stock only out of income available over the past year and only if prospective earnings retention is consistent with the organization’s expected future needs and financial condition. The policy provides that a financial holding company should not maintain a level of cash dividends that undermines the financial holding company’s ability to serve as a source of strength to its banking subsidiaries.

Various federal and state statutory provisions limit the amount of dividends that subsidiary banks can pay to their holding companies without regulatory approval. ~~Under Delaware banking law,~~Without the ~~Bank’s directors~~prior approval of the OCC, a dividend may ~~declare~~not be paid if the total of all dividends ~~on common or preferred stock~~declared by a bank in any calendar year is in excess of ~~so much~~the current year’s net income combined with the retained net income of ~~its net profits as they judge expedient, but~~ the ~~Bank must, before the declaration~~two preceding years. Additionally, a dividend may not be paid in excess of a bank’s retained earnings. Moreover, an insured depository institution may not pay a dividend if the payment would cause it to be less than “adequately capitalized” under the prompt corrective action framework as defined in the Federal Deposit Insurance Act or if the institution is in default in the payment of an assessment due to the FDIC. Similarly, a banking organization that fails to satisfy regulatory minimum capital conservation buffer requirements will be subject to certain limitations, which include restrictions on ~~common stock from net profits, carry 50% of its net profits from the preceding period for which the dividend is paid to its surplus fund until its surplus fund amounts to 50% of its~~ capital ~~stock and thereafter must carry 25% of its net profits for the preceding period for which the dividend is paid to its surplus fund until its surplus fund amounts to 100% of its capital stock.~~distributions.

In addition to these explicit limitations, federal and state regulatory agencies are authorized to prohibit a banking subsidiary or financial holding company from engaging in an unsafe or unsound practice. Depending upon the circumstances, the agencies could take the position that paying a dividend would constitute an unsafe or unsound banking practice. In August 2015, the Bank entered into an Amendment to a 2014 Consent Order with the FDIC pursuant to which the Bank may not pay dividends without prior FDIC approval. On May 11, 2015, the Company had received a Supervisory Letterpursuant to which the Company may not pay dividends without prior Federal Reserve approval. The Federal Reserve approved the payment of the interest on the Company’s trust preferred securities which were due September 15, 2017. Future payments are subject to future approval by the Federal Reserve.

The Company and the Bank are subject to various regulatory capital requirements administered by the federal banking agencies. Failure to meet minimum capital requirements can initiate certain mandatory and possible additional discretionary actions by regulators that, if undertaken, could have a direct material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements. Under capital adequacy guidelines and the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action, the Company and the Bank must meet specific capital guidelines that involve quantitative measures of their assets, liabilities and certain off-balance-sheet items as calculated under regulatory accounting practices. The capital amounts and classification of the Company and the Bank are also subject to qualitative judgments by the regulators about components, risk weightings and other factors. Moreover, capital requirements may be modified based upon regulatory rules or by regulatory discretion at any time reflecting a variety of factors. including deterioration in asset quality.

The following table sets forth our regulatory capital amounts and ratios for the periods indicated:



	Tier 1 capital	Tier 1 capital	Total capital	Common equity
	to average	to risk-weighted	to risk-weighted	tier 1 to risk
	assets ratio	assets ratio	assets ratio	weighted assets

As of September 30, 2023
The Bancorp, Inc.	10.92%	15.53%	16.04%	15.53%
The Bancorp Bank, National Association	12.13%	17.26%	17.77%	17.26%
"Well capitalized" institution (under federal regulations-Basel III)	5.00%	8.00%	10.00%	6.50%

As of December 31, 2022
The Bancorp, Inc.	9.63%	13.40%	13.87%	13.40%
The Bancorp Bank, National Association	10.73%	14.95%	15.42%	14.95%
"Well capitalized" institution (under federal regulations-Basel III)	5.00%	8.00%	10.00%	6.50%

Note ~~13.~~14. Legal

~~The Company received~~On June 12, 2019, the Bank was served with a ~~subpoena from~~qui tam lawsuit filed in the ~~SEC, dated March 22, 2016, relating to an investigation by the SEC~~Superior Court of the ~~Company's restatement~~State of ~~its financial statements for~~Delaware, New Castle County. The Delaware Department of Justice intervened in the ~~years ended December 31, 2010 through December 31, 2013~~litigation. The case is titled The State of Delaware, Plaintiff, Ex rel. Russell S. Rogers, Plaintiff-Relator, v. The Bancorp Bank, Interactive Communications International, Inc., and InComm Financial Services, Inc., Defendants. The lawsuit alleges that the defendants violated the Delaware False Claims Act by not paying balances on certain open-loop “Vanilla” prepaid cards to the State of Delaware as unclaimed property. The complaint seeks actual and treble damages, statutory penalties, and attorneys’ fees. The Bank has filed an answer denying the allegations and continues to vigorously defend against the claims. The Bank and other defendants previously filed a motion to dismiss the action, but the motion was denied and the interim periods ended March 31, 2014, September 30, 2014 and September 30, 2014, which restatement was filed with the SEC on September 28, 2015, and the facts and circumstances underlying the restatement.case is in preliminary stages of discovery. The Company is ~~cooperating fully~~unable to determine whether the ultimate resolution of the matter will have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition or operations.

On January 12, 2021, three former employees of the Bank filed separate complaints against the Company in the Supreme Court of the State of New York, New York County. The Company subsequently removed all three lawsuits to the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. The cases are captioned: John Edward Barker, Plaintiff v. The Bancorp, Inc., Defendant; Alexander John Kamai, Plaintiff v. The Bancorp, Inc., Defendant; and John Patrick McGlynn III, Plaintiff v. The Bancorp, Inc., Defendant. The lawsuits arise from the Bank’s termination of the plaintiffs’ employment in connection with the ~~SEC's investigation.~~restructuring of its CMBS business. The ~~costs~~plaintiffs sought damages in the following amounts: $4,135,142 (Barker), $901,088 (Kamai) and $2,909,627 (McGlynn). On June 11, 2021, the Company filed a consolidated motion to ~~respond~~dismiss in each case. On February 25, 2022, the court granted the Company’s motion in part, dismissing McGlynn’s claims in entirety and most of Barker and Kamai’s claims. The sole claims remaining are Barker and Kamai’s breach of implied contract claims related to an unpaid bonus, for which they seek $2,000,000 and $300,000, respectively. On September 29, 2022, the Company filed a motion for summary judgment in both matters. On September 8, 2023, the court granted the Company’s motion for summary judgment and entered a judgment closing both cases. The Company now considers these matters resolved.

On September 14, 2021, Cachet Financial Services (“Cachet”) filed an adversary proceeding against the Bank in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Central District of California, titled Cachet Financial Services, Plaintiff v. The Bancorp Bank, et al., Defendants. The case was filed within the context of Cachet’s pending Chapter 11 bankruptcy case. The Bank previously served as the Originating Depository Financial Institution (“ODFI”) for automated clearing house (“ACH”) transactions in connection with Cachet’s payroll services business. The matter arises from the Bank’s termination of its Payroll Processing ODFI Agreement with Cachet on October 23, 2019, for safety and soundness reasons. The initial complaint alleges eight causes of action: (i) breach of contract; (ii) negligence; (iii) intentional interference with contract; (iv) conversion; (v) express indemnity; (vi) implied indemnity; (vii) accounting;

and (viii) objection to the ~~subpoena~~Bank’s proof of claim in the bankruptcy case. On November 4, 2021, the Bank filed a motion in the United States District Court for the Central District of California to withdraw the reference of the adversary proceeding to the bankruptcy court, which was denied in February 2023. On August 3, 2022, Cachet served the Bank with a First Amended Complaint wherein Cachet, among other things, withdraws its implied indemnity claim against the Bank and adds several defendants unaffiliated with the Bank and causes of action related to those parties. As to the Bank, Cachet seeks approximately $150 million in damages, an accounting and disallowance of the Bank’s proof of claim. The Bank is vigorously defending against these claims. On September 28, 2022, the Bank filed a partial motion to dismiss, seeking to dispose of the majority of Cachet’s claims against the Bank. The motion is still pending before the bankruptcy court. The Company is not yet able to determine whether the ultimate resolution of this matter will have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial conditions or operations.

On March 27, 2023, the Bank received a Civil Investigative Demand (“CID”) from the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (“CFPB”) seeking documents and information related to the Bank’s escheatment practices in connection with certain accounts offered through one of the Bank’s program partners. The Bank continues to cooperate with the ~~SEC's investigation have been~~CFPB, including by responding to the CID. While the Company remains confident in the Bank’s escheatment practices, it cannot predict the timing or final outcome of the investigation. Future costs related to this matter may be material and ~~we expect such costs to~~could continue to be material at least through the completion of the ~~SEC’s~~ investigation.

On September ~~30, 2016, the Company received written notice from the Internal Revenue Service that it will be conducting an audit of the Company's tax returns for the tax years 2012, 2013~~8, 2023, Del Mar TIC I, LLC and ~~2014. The audit is in process.~~

The Company received a letter dated August 1, 2016, demanding inspection of its books and records pursuant to Section 220 of the Delaware General Corporation Law, or DCGL, from legal counsel representing a shareholder (the "Demand Letter"Del Mar TIC II, LLC (together, “Del Mar”). The Company, through outside legal counsel, responded to the Demand Letter by permitting the shareholder to inspect certain of the Company’s books and records and by objecting to other requests. On January 30, 2017, the shareholder filed a complaint against the Bank in the Supreme Court ~~of Chancery~~ of the State of ~~Delaware seeking an order from the court, pursuant to Section 220 of the DGCL, compelling the Company to permit the shareholder to inspect additional books~~New York, New York County, captioned Del Mar TIC I, LLC and records of the Company. The Company believes that its original response to the Demand Letter was appropriate in all respects and continues to defend against the complaint. On July 27, 2017, the Court of Chancery ruled in favor of the Company and granted an Order of Final Judgment Denying Plaintiff’s Demand To Inspect The Books And Records of Defendant. The court’s Order was subject to an appeal right which has now expired; no appeal was filed. Both the Demand Letter and the complaint threaten the commencement of a shareholder’s derivative suit against certain officers and directors of the Company

seeking damages and other remedies on behalf of the Company. We have been advised by our counsel in the matter that reasonably possible losses cannot be estimated, but we and our counsel continue to believe the claim is without merit.

~~On October 17, 2017, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (the “FDIC”) informed~~Del Mar TIC II, LLC, Plaintiffs v. The Bancorp Bank, ~~(the “Bank”), a wholly owned subsidiary of~~Defendant. The Bancorp, Inc. (the “Company”), that it intends to pursue an Order For Restitution (“Restitution Order”) and Order to Pay Civil Money Penalty (“CMP Order”) in an amount up to $2,576,000. The FDIC’s action principally emanates from one of the Bank’s third-party payment processors (“Third Party Processor”) suffering an internal system programming glitch. This inadvertently resulted in consumers that engaged in signature-based point of sale transactions during the period from December 2010 to November 2014 being charged a greater fee than what was disclosed by the Bank. Impacted consumers are being reimbursed by the Third Party Processor at its own expense. The Restitution Order would require the Bank to make such reimbursements if not otherwise made by the Third Party Processor, however, the Bank is indemnified by the Third Party Processor for such reimbursements. Although the Bank is still evaluating its position with regard to the Restitution Order and the CMP Order, the Company accrued $2,500,000 of related expense in its financial statements for the quarter ended September 30, 2017 in connection with the CMP Order. Any amounts owed from the CMP Order would not be subject to any indemnification or recovery from any third party.

The independent investor in Walnut Street, the securitization into which the Bank sold certain loans when it discontinued its Philadelphia commercial loan operations, has taken actions which may result in litigation. Specifically, counsel for the independent investor has requested that the Note Administrator hold monthly distribution payments in escrow until the independent investor’s alternative interpretation of the order of payments, as compared to the interpretation of the Bank and the Note Administrator, is resolved. Based on the independent investor’s request, the Note Administrator withheld the September 2017 payment to the independent investor and the Bank and indicated that it would continue to do so until this issue was resolved. Management of the Company, based on advice of its counsel, believes it is unlikelycomplaint alleges, among other things, that the Bank improperly and Note Administrator’s interpretation will be overturned. However, if such interpretation is overturned, based upon the current model used to value Walnut Street, an estimated $8 million loss may be recognized, basedunreasonably force-placed excessive insurance coverage on ~~currently estimated cash flows which would be redirected~~real property that serves as security for a loan from the Bank to Del Mar, and that the ~~independent investor.~~Bank is improperly paying the related insurance premiums from escrow funds. The complaint asserts five causes of action: (i) declaratory judgment; (ii) breach of fiduciary duty; (iii) breach of contract: implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing; (iv) breach of contract: escrow account; and (v) injunctive relief. On October 12, 2023, the Bank removed the case to the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. The Bank intends to vigorously defend against the claims. The Company is unable to determine whether the ultimate resolution of the matter will have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition or operations.

In addition, we are a party to various routine legal proceedings arising out of the ordinary course of our business. Management believes that none of these actions, individually or in the aggregate, will have a material adverse effect on our financial condition or operations.

Note ~~14.~~15. Segment Financials

The Company performed a strategic evaluation of its businesses in the third quarter of 2014. As a result of the evaluation, the Company decided to discontinue its commercial lending operations, as described in Note 15, Discontinued Operations. The shift from a traditional bank balance sheet led the Company to evaluate its continuing operations. Based on the continuing operations of the Company, it was determined that there would be four segments of the business:operates under three segments: specialty finance, payments ~~corporate~~ and ~~discontinued operations.~~corporate. The chief operating decision maker for these segments is the Chief Executive Officer. Specialty finance includes the origination of non-SBA commercial ~~loan sales,~~real estate loans, SBA loans, ~~leasing~~direct lease financing, security-backed lines of credit, cash value insurance policy-backed lines of credit and ~~SBLOCs and any~~ deposits generated by those business lines. Payments include prepaid ~~cards, merchant~~card accounts, card payments, ACH processing and ~~affinity accounts.~~deposits generated by those business lines. Corporate includes the Company’s investment portfolio, corporate overhead and ~~other~~ non-allocated expenses. ~~Investment income is allocated to the payments segment. These operating segments reflect the way the Company views its current operations.~~

For the three months ended September 30, 2017

Specialty finance

Payments

Corporate

Discontinued operations

Total

(in thousands)
Interest income

$            21,631

$                     -

$            10,283

$                     -

$           31,914
Interest allocation

-

10,283

(10,283)

-

-
Interest expense

848

2,709

456

-

4,013
Net interest income

20,783

7,574

(456)

-

27,901
Provision for loan and lease losses

800

-

-

-

800
Non-interest income

13,834

14,638

535

-

29,007
Non-interest expense

14,844

16,384

12,655

-

43,883
Income (loss) from continuing operations before taxes

18,973

5,828

(12,576)

-

12,225
Income tax expense

-

-

5,455

-

5,455
Income (loss) from continuing operations

18,973

5,828

(18,031)

-

6,770
Income from discontinued operations

-

-

-

511

511
Net income (loss)

$            18,973

$             5,828

$          (18,031)

$                511

$             7,281

For the three months ended September 30, 2016

Specialty finance

Payments

Corporate

Discontinued operations

Total

(in thousands)
Interest income

$            17,727

$                     -

$              9,005

$                     -

$           26,732
Interest allocation

-

9,005

(9,005)

-

-
Interest expense

740

1,975

475

-

3,190
Net interest income

16,987

7,030

(475)

-

23,542
Provision for loan and lease losses

750

-

-

-

750
Non-interest income

4,215

15,180

509

-

19,904
Non-interest expense

16,352

24,081

3,738

-

44,171
Income (loss) from continuing operations before taxes

4,100

(1,871)

(3,704)

-

(1,475)
Income tax expense

-

-

55

-

55
Income (loss) from continuing operations

4,100

(1,871)

(3,759)

-

(1,530)
Loss from discontinued operations

-

-

-

(24,021)

(24,021)
Net income (loss)

$              4,100

$           (1,871)

$            (3,759)

$         (24,021)

$         (25,551)

For the nine months ended September 30, 2017

Specialty finance

Payments

Corporate

Discontinued operations

Total

(in thousands)
Interest income

$            59,861

$                     -

$            31,315

$                     -

$           91,176
Interest allocation

-

31,315

(31,315)

-

-
Interest expense

2,627

7,567

989

-

11,183
Net interest income

57,234

23,748

(989)

-

79,993
Provision

2,150

-

-

-

2,150
Non-interest income

24,507

45,625

1,267

-

71,399
Non-interest expense

42,251

54,829

21,949

-

119,029
Income (loss) from continuing operations before taxes

37,340

14,544

(21,671)

-

30,213
Income tax benefit

-

-

(457)

-

(457)
Income (loss) from continuing operations

37,340

14,544

(21,214)

-

30,670
Income from discontinued operations

-

-

-

3,438

3,438
Net income (loss)

$            37,340

$           14,544

$          (21,214)

$             3,438

$           34,108

For the nine months ended September 30, 2016

Specialty finance

Payments

Corporate

Discontinued operations

Total

(in thousands)
Interest income

$            48,712

$                    2

$            25,613

$                     -

$           74,327
Interest allocation

-

25,613

(25,613)

-

-
Interest expense

2,139

5,779

1,421

-

9,339
Net interest income

46,573

19,836

(1,421)

-

64,988
Provision

1,810

-

-

-

1,810
Non-interest income

(6,787)
*
48,245

6,674

-

48,132
Non-interest expense

47,828

96,376

12,241

-

156,445
Loss from continuing operations before taxes

(9,852)

(28,295)

(6,988)

-

(45,135)
Income tax benefit

-

-

(15,324)

-

(15,324)
Income (loss) from continuing operations

(9,852)

(28,295)

8,336

-

(29,811)
Loss from discontinued operations

-

-

-

(37,909)

(37,909)
Net income (loss)

$            (9,852)

$         (28,295)

$              8,336

$         (37,909)

$         (67,720)
* Reflects writedown of investment in unconsolidated entity

September 30, 2017

Specialty finance

Payments

Corporate

Discontinued operations

Total

(in thousands)
Total assets

$        1,818,646

$             38,155

$        1,821,823

$           314,994

$        3,993,618
Total liabilities

$           645,265

$        2,702,958

$           305,934

$                       -

$        3,654,157

December 31, 2016

Specialty finance

Payments

Corporate

Discontinued operations

Total

(in thousands)
Total assets

$        2,019,180

$             27,935

$        2,450,288

$           360,711

$        4,858,114
Total liabilities

$           596,574

$        3,401,142

$           561,435

$                       -

$        4,559,151

~~Note 15. Discontinued Operations~~

The Company performed a strategic evaluation of its businesses in the third quarter of 2014 and decided to discontinue its commercial lending operations to focus on its specialty finance lending. The loans which constitute the commercial loan portfolio are in the process of disposition. As such, financial results of the commercial lending operations are presented as separate from continuing operations on the consolidated statements of operations and assets of the commercial lending operations to be disposed are presented as assets held for sale on the consolidated balance sheets.

The following ~~table presents financial results of the commercial lending business included in net income (loss) from discontinued operations~~tables provide segment information for the ~~three months and nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 (in thousands).~~periods indicated:

For the three months ended September 30,

For the nine months ended September 30,

2017

2016

2017

2016
Interest income
$                             3,098

$                            3,891

$                             9,594

$                          15,037
Interest expense
-

-

-

-
Provision for loan and lease losses
-

-

-

-
Net interest income after provision
3,098

3,891

9,594

15,037

Non interest income
549

575

1,001

678
Non interest expense
2,818

25,956

5,107

53,788

Income (loss) before taxes
829

(21,490)

5,488

(38,073)
Income tax (benefit) provision
318

2,531

2,050

(164)
Net income (loss)
$                               511

$                        (24,021)

$                             3,438

$                        (37,909)



	For the three months ended September 30, 2023
	Specialty finance		Payments		Corporate		Total
		(Dollars in thousands)
Interest income	$	109,728	$	54	$	19,186	$	128,968
Interest allocation		(33,548)		37,748		(4,200)		—
Interest expense		1,118		37,186		1,782		40,086
Net interest income		75,062		616		13,204		88,882
Provision for credit losses		1,752		—		—		1,752
Non-interest income		2,661		24,101		18		26,780
Non-interest expense		20,980		19,033		7,446		47,459
Income before taxes		54,991		5,684		5,776		66,451
Income tax expense		—		—		16,314		16,314
Net income (loss)	$	54,991	$	5,684	$	(10,538)	$	50,137



	For the three months ended September 30, 2022
	Specialty finance		Payments		Corporate		Total
		(Dollars in thousands)
Interest income	$	75,041	$	34	$	8,846	$	83,921
Interest allocation		(17,747)		17,154		593		—
Interest expense		940		13,981		4,341		19,262
Net interest income		56,354		3,207		5,098		64,659
Provision of credit losses		822		—		—		822
Non-interest income		1,952		21,440		34		23,426
Non-interest expense		18,292		17,348		9,190		44,830
Income (loss) before taxes		39,192		7,299		(4,058)		42,433
Income tax expense		—		—		11,829		11,829
Net income (loss)	$	39,192	$	7,299	$	(15,887)	$	30,604



	For the nine months ended September 30, 2023
	Specialty finance		Payments		Corporate		Total
		(Dollars in thousands)
Interest income	$	321,707	$	94	$	55,633	$	377,434
Interest allocation		(98,805)		108,227		(9,422)		—
Interest expense		3,901		102,353		9,287		115,541
Net interest income		219,001		5,968		36,924		261,893
Provision for credit losses		4,016		—		—		4,016
Non-interest income		10,437		74,269		399		85,105
Non-interest expense		63,528		56,339		25,565		145,432
Income before taxes		161,894		23,898		11,758		197,550
Income tax expense		—		—		49,282		49,282
Net income (loss)	$	161,894	$	23,898	$	(37,524)	$	148,268

September 30,

December 31,

2017

2016
Loans, net
$                         277,385

$                        340,396
Other real estate owned
37,609

20,315
Total assets
$                         314,994

$                        360,711



	For the nine months ended September 30, 2022
	Specialty finance		Payments		Corporate		Total
		(Dollars in thousands)
Interest income	$	179,700	$	89	$	21,596	$	201,385
Interest allocation		(28,300)		28,565		(265)		—
Interest expense		1,429		19,989		7,886		29,304
Net interest income		149,971		8,665		13,445		172,081
Provision for credit losses		4,331		—		—		4,331
Non-interest income		11,496		64,524		3,923		79,943
Non-interest expense		53,071		51,529		21,427		126,027
Income before taxes		104,065		21,660		(4,059)		121,666
Income tax expense		—		—		31,694		31,694
Net income (loss)	$	104,065	$	21,660	$	(35,753)	$	89,972

The Company utilizes lower of cost or market valuations for discontinued operations loans which are updated based on internal loan officers’ information, third party consultant information, internal loan review analysis and third party review of impairments. Based on that review, weighted average fair values were applied to the loans not specifically reviewed. The results of discontinued operations do not include any future severance payments. Of the approximately $1.1 billion in book value of loans in that portfolio as of the September 30, 2014 date of discontinuance of operations, $315.0 million of loans and other real estate owned remain in assets held for sale on the balance sheet as a result of loan sales, principal paydowns and fair value charges. The Company is attempting to sell those remaining loans. Additionally, the balance sheet reflects $107.7 million in investment in unconsolidated entity, which is comprised of notes owned by the Company as a result of the sale of certain discontinued loans to Walnut Street, see Note 8, Fair Value Measurements.



	September 30, 2023
	Specialty finance		Payments		Corporate		Total
		(Dollars in thousands)
Total assets	$	5,550,608	$	49,400	$	1,865,759	$	7,465,767
Total liabilities	$	225,314	$	6,204,051	$	262,714	$	6,692,079



	December 31, 2022
	Specialty finance		Payments		Corporate		Total
		(Dollars in thousands)
Total assets	$	6,042,765	$	57,894	$	1,802,341	$	7,903,000
Total liabilities	$	321,335	$	6,101,539	$	786,095	$	7,208,969

Note 16. Subsequent Events

The Company evaluated its September 30, ~~2017~~2023 consolidated financial statements for subsequent events through the date the consolidated financial statements were issued. ~~The~~Pursuant to the 2023 Repurchase Program, described in “Note 12. Shareholders’ Equity,” between October 1, 2023 and November 1, 2023, the Company ~~is not aware~~repurchased 235,291 shares of ~~any subsequent events which would require recognition or disclosure in the financial statements, not otherwise disclosed herein.~~its common stock, at a total cost of $8.0 million and an average price of $34.00 per share.

~~Part I -~~ Item 2.Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

The following Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (“MD&A”) provides information about the Company’s results of operations, financial condition, liquidity and asset quality. This information is intended to facilitate your understanding and assessment of significant changes and trends related to our financial condition and results of operations. This MD&A should be read in conjunction with our financial information in our 2022 Form 10-K and the unaudited interim consolidated financial statements and notes thereto contained in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

Important Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements

When used in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, the words ~~“believes”, “anticipates”, “expects”~~“believes,” “anticipates,” “expects,” “intends,” “should,” “will,” “could,” “estimates,” “plans” or the negative versions of those words or other comparable words and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking ~~statements. Such~~ statements, as such term is defined in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Factors that could cause results to differ from those expressed in these forward-looking statements include, but are ~~subject~~not limited to, ~~certain~~the risks and uncertainties ~~more particularly~~ described or referenced in Part I, Item ~~1A, under the caption~~1A. “Risk Factors,” in ~~our Annual Report on~~the 2022 Form 10-K ~~for the year ended December 31, 2016~~ and in other of our public filings with the ~~Securities~~SEC, as well as the following:

continued movement in interest rates and ~~Exchange Commission. These risks~~the resulting impact on net interest income;

changes in the monetary and ~~uncertainties could cause~~fiscal policies of the federal government and its agencies;

the impacts of recent volatility in the banking sector and actual ~~results~~or perceived concerns regarding the liquidity and soundness of other financial institutions;

adverse changes in general economic and business conditions, including the impact of such conditions on the market value of real estate securing certain of our loans;

levels of net charge-offs and the adequacy of the ACL in covering expected losses;

any significant increase in the level of the Bank’s deposits that are uninsured by the FDIC;

any failure to ~~differ materially from those expressed~~maintain or ~~implied in this Form 10-Q.~~ enhance our competitive position with respect to new products, services and technology and achieve our strategic priorities, such as growing payments-related deposit accounts;

weather events, natural disasters, geopolitical events, public health crises and other catastrophic events beyond our control;

the outcome of regulatory matters or investigations, litigation, and other legal actions; and

our ability to identify and prevent cyber-security incidents, such as data security breaches, ransomware, malware intrusion, or other attacks.

We caution readers not to place undue reliance on ~~these~~ forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date ~~hereof.~~hereof and are based on information presently available to the management of the Company. We undertake no obligation to publicly revise or update these forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date of this ~~report~~Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q except as required by applicable law.

~~In the following discussion we provide information about our results~~Overview

Nature of operations, financial condition, liquidity and asset quality. We intend that this information facilitate your understanding and assessment of significant changes and trends related to our financial condition and results of operations. You should read this section in conjunction with “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016.Operations

~~Overview~~

We are a Delaware financial holding company and our primary, wholly-owned subsidiary ~~wholly owned,~~ is The Bancorp Bank, ~~which we refer to as~~National Association, or the Bank. The vast majority of our revenue and income is currently generated through the Bank. In our continuing ~~lending~~ operations, we have four primary lines of specialty lending: ~~securities-backed lines of credit, or~~

SBLOC, ~~automobile fleet~~IBLOC, and ~~other equipment~~ investment advisor financing;

leasing ~~Small Business Administration, or~~(direct lease financing);

SBLs, primarily SBA loans; and

non-SBA commercial real estate bridge loans.

SBLOCs and ~~loans and loans generated for sale into capital markets primarily through commercial loan securitizations, or CMBS. SBLOCs~~IBLOCs are loans which are generated through ~~institutional banking~~ affinity groups and are respectively collateralized by marketable ~~securities.~~securities and the cash value of insurance policies. SBLOCs are typically offered in conjunction with brokerage accounts and are offered nationally. ~~Automobile~~IBLOC loans are typically viewed as an alternative to standard policy loans from insurance companies and are utilized by our existing advisor base as well as insurance agents throughout the country. Investment advisor financing are loans made to investment advisors for purposes of debt refinance, acquisition of another investment firm or internal succession. Vehicle fleet and, to a lesser extent, other equipment leases are generated in a number of Atlantic ~~coast~~Coast and other ~~states.~~states and are collateralized primarily by vehicles. SBA loans are generated nationally and are collateralized by commercial properties and other types of collateral. Our non-SBA commercial real estate bridge loans, at fair value, are primarily collateralized by multi-family properties (apartment buildings), and to a lesser extent, by hotel and retail properties. These loans were originally generated for sale ~~into CMBS capital markets~~through securitizations. In 2020, we decided to retain these loans on our balance sheet as interest-earning assets and resumed originating such loans in the third quarter of 2021. These new

originations are identified as real estate bridge loans, consist of apartment building loans, and are held for investment in the loan portfolio. Prior originations originally intended for securitizations continue to be accounted for at fair value, and are included on the balance sheet in “Commercial loans, at fair value.”

The majority of our deposit accounts and non-interest income are generated in our payments business line, or the Fintech Solutions Group, which consists of consumer deposit accounts accessed by prepaid or debit cards, issuing deposit accounts, ACH accounts, other payments such as rapid funds transfer and the collection of payments through credit card companies on behalf of merchants. The issuing deposit accounts are comprised of debit and prepaid card accounts that are generated by independent companies that market directly to end users. Our issuing deposit account types are diverse and include: consumer and business debit, general purpose reloadable prepaid, pre-tax medical spending benefit, payroll, gift, government, corporate incentive, reward, business payment accounts and others. Our ACH accounts facilitate bill payments, and our collection services for payments made ~~nationally.~~

~~In our~~to merchants consist of those which must be settled through associations such as Visa or MasterCard. We also provide banking ~~operations, we focus on providing our~~ services ~~on a national basis~~ to organizations with a pre-existing customer base ~~who can use one or more selected banking services~~ tailored to support or complement the services provided by these organizations to their ~~customers.~~customers, known as “affinity banking.” These services include ~~private label banking; credit~~loan and ~~debit card processing~~deposit accounts for ~~merchants affiliated with independent service organizations; and prepaid cards, also known as stored value cards, for insurers, incentive plans, large retail chains and consumer service organizations.~~investment advisory companies through our institutional banking department. We typically provide these services under the name and through the facilities of each organization with whom we develop a relationship. ~~We refer~~

Performance Summary

Our net income increased to ~~this, generally, as affinity group banking. Our private label banking, merchant processing and prepaid card programs are~~$50.1 million for the third quarter of 2023, from $30.6 million for the third quarter of 2022, primarily reflecting a ~~source of fee~~$24.2 million increase in net interest income and ~~low-cost~~ a $3.4 million increase in non-interest income, partially offset by a $2.6 million increase in non-interest expense. Higher rates on loans resulted in increases in net interest income, with higher securities rates offsetting the impact of lower securities balances on securities interest. Our cost of funds rose to 2.50% in the third quarter of 2023, driven primarily by the contractual adjustments for payments balances to Federal Reserve rate increases. See “Asset and Liability Management” in this MD&A for further discussion of how our funding sources and loans adjust to Federal Reserve rate changes.

Prepaid, debit card and other payment fees, including ACH, are the largest drivers of non-interest income. Such fees for the third quarter of 2023 increased $2.7 million over the comparable 2022 period.

Third quarter 2023 non-interest expense increased $2.6 million from the third quarter of 2022, reflecting an increase of $2.5 million in salaries and employee benefits. There was a $1.8 million provision for credit losses in the third quarter of 2023, compared to a provision for credit losses of $822,000 in the third quarter of 2022.

Key Performance Indicators

We use a number of key performance indicators (“KPIs”) to measure our overall financial performance and believe they are useful to investors because they provide additional information about our underlying operational performance and trends. We describe how we calculate and use a number of these KPIs and analyze their results below.

Return on assets and return on equity. Two KPIs commonly used within the banking industry to measure overall financial performance are return on assets and return on equity. Return on assets measures the amount of earnings compared to the level of assets utilized to generate those earnings and is derived by dividing net income by average assets. Return on equity measures the amount of earnings compared to the equity utilized to generate those earnings and is derived by dividing net income by average shareholders’ equity.

Ratio of equity to assets. Ratio of equity to assets is another KPI frequently utilized within the banking industry and is derived by dividing period-end shareholders’ equity by period-end total assets.

Net interest margin and credit losses. Net interest margin is a KPI associated with net interest income, which is the largest component of our earnings and is the difference between the interest earned on our interest-earning assets consisting of loans and investments, less the interest on our funding, consisting primarily of deposits. Net interest margin is derived by dividing net interest income by average interest-earning assets. Higher levels of earnings and net interest income on lower levels of assets, equity and interest-earning assets are generally desirable. However, these indicators must be considered in light of regulatory capital requirements, which impact equity, and credit risk inherent in loans. Accordingly, the magnitude of credit losses is an additional KPI.

Other KPIs. Other KPIs we use from time to time include growth in average loans and leases, non-interest income growth, the level of non-interest expense and various capital measures including equity to assets.

Results of KPIs

In the third quarter ~~of 2014, we decided~~2023, return on assets and return on equity amounted to ~~discontinue our Philadelphia-based commercial lending operations. The loans which constitute that portfolio are~~2.71% and 26.12% (annualized), respectively, compared to 1.69% and 18.39% (annualized) in the ~~process~~third quarter of ~~disposition. This represents a strategic shift to a focus on our national specialty lending programs including small fleet leasing, SBLOC, CMBS origination and SBA lending. We anticipate using~~2022. For the proceeds from disposition to acquire investment securities and to provide liquidity to fund growth in our continuing specialty lending lines. Yields we obtain from reinvestment of the proceeds will be subject to economic and other conditions at the time of reinvestment, including market interest rates, many of which will be beyond our control. We cannot predict whether income resulting from the reinvestment of loans we hold for sale resulting from discontinued operations will match or exceed the amount from the sold loans. Of the approximate $1.1 billion in book value of loans in that commercial and residential portfolio as of thenine month period ended September 30, ~~2014 date~~2023, return on assets and return on equity amounted to 2.66% and 27.01% (annualized), respectively, compared to 1.69% and 18.28% (annualized) for the nine month period ended September 30, 2022.

At September 30, 2023, the ratio of ~~discontinuance~~equity to assets was 10.36%, compared to 8.53% at September 30, 2022, reflecting an increase in equity capital from retained earnings, partially offset by share repurchases.

Net interest margin was 5.07% in the third quarter of ~~operations, $315.0~~2023, versus 3.69% in the third quarter of 2022, and 4.86% versus 3.32%, respectively, for the nine month periods ended September 30, 2023 and 2022, reflecting a $24.2 million increase in net interest income in the third quarter of ~~loans~~2023 compared to the third quarter of 2022, and ~~other real estate owned remain~~an $89.8 million increase in ~~assets held for sale on~~net interest income in the ~~balance sheet, which reflects~~nine month period ended September 30, 2023 compared to the nine month period ended September 30, 2022.

Increases in the above KPIs in 2023 reflected the impact of ~~related sales, paydowns~~higher rates on loans and ~~fair value charges. Additionally, the balance sheet reflects $107.7 million in investment in unconsolidated entity, Walnut Street, which is comprised of notes owned by the Company~~securities as a result of the sale of certain discontinued loans. In the third quarter, the independent investor in Walnut Street took actions which may result in litigation which may result in financial loss to the Bank, although in the opinion of counsel that is unlikely (see note 13 to the financial statements).

The results of the first nine months of 2017 reflected a return to profitability, consistent with our business plan and budget. The improvement reflected revenue growth, expense reductions, the conclusion of BSA lookback expense in 2016 and credit related charges in discontinued operations in 2016. Year to date net income for 2017 was $34.1 million. Continuing growth in net interest income resulted from loan growth including SBLOC balances which grew 16% year over year with leasing and SBA balances each growing 11% year over year. In addition toFederal Reserve rate increases, while the impact of loan growth ~~Federal Reserve rate increases also resulted~~ in higher interest income, while interest expense increased to a lesser extent. The Bank’s largest funding source, prepaid card deposits, contractually adjust to only a fraction of increases in market rates. Expense reductions also contributedcertain categories was more than offset by SBLOC and IBLOC payoffs. We believe that these payoffs reflected customer sensitivity to the ~~first nine months~~increasing rate environment. As a result of ~~2017 earnings,~~the SBLOC and ~~non-interest expense was $8.3 million less than the first nine months of 2016, excluding Bank Secrecy Act lookback expenses. Additional expense reductions are being pursued~~IBLOC payoffs, average loans and ~~may impact future periods; however, timing of such expense reductions is difficult~~leases decreased to ~~project. In~~$5.61 billion in the third quarter of ~~2017, the FDIC notified the Bank that it intended~~2023 compared to ~~pursue a civil money penalty to be paid by the Bank. While the~~

~~Bank is still evaluating its position with respect to the penalty, $2.5 million of expense was accrued~~$5.91 billion in the third quarter ~~(see note 13 to the financial statements). Prepaid card fees are the largest driver~~ of ~~non-interest income. Fees~~2022. The provision for credit losses was $1.8 million in the ~~first~~third quarter of 2023 compared to a provision for credit losses of $822,000 in the third quarter of 2022. Our provision for credit losses was $4.0 million for the nine months of 2017 were comparable to the first nine months of 2016 reflecting the exit of a client which changed ownership and the termination of several programs whose sponsors decided to exit prepaid cards. Those volumes were partially offset by organic growth in other programs. A decrease in assets from $4.2 billion atmonth period ended September 30, ~~2016~~2023 compared to ~~$4.0 billion at~~$4.3 million for the nine month period ended September 30, ~~2017 reflected~~2022. Non-interest expense increases over the ~~exit of less profitable deposit relationships.~~ prior year continued to be driven mostly by salary expense.

Critical Accounting ~~Policies and~~ Estimates

Our accounting and reporting policies conform with ~~accounting principles generally accepted in the United States~~GAAP and general practices within the financial services industry. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with ~~accounting principles generally accepted in the United States~~GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and the accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those estimates. We ~~believe~~view critical accounting estimates as those estimates made in accordance with GAAP that the determination of our allowance for loan and lease losses, our determination of the fair value of financial instruments and the level in which an instrument is placed within the valuation hierarchy, our determination of other than temporary impairment, and income taxes involve a ~~higher degree~~significant level of ~~judgment and complexity than our other significant accounting policies.~~

We determine our allowance for loan and lease losses with the objective of maintaining a reserve level we believe to be sufficient to absorb our estimated probable credit losses. We base our determination of the adequacy of the allowance on periodic evaluations of our loan portfolio and other relevant factors. However, this evaluation is inherently subjective as it requires material estimates, including, among others, expected default probabilities, the amount of loss we may incur on a defaulted loan, expected commitment usage, the amounts and timing of expected future cash flows on impaired loans, value of collateral, estimated losses on consumer loans and residential mortgages, and general amounts for historical loss experience. We also evaluate economic conditions and uncertainties in estimating losses and inherent risks in our loan portfolio. To the extent actual outcomes differ from our estimates, we may need additional provisions for loan losses. Any such additional provisions for loan losses will be a direct charge to our earnings. See “Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses”.

The fair value of a financial instrument is defined as the amount at which the instrument could be exchanged in a current transaction between willing parties, other than in a forced or liquidation sale. We estimate the fair value of a financial instrument using a variety of valuation methods. Where financial instruments are actively tradedestimation uncertainty and have ~~quoted market prices, quoted market prices~~had or are used for fair value. When the financial instruments are not actively traded, other observable market inputs, such as quoted prices of securities with similar characteristics, may be used, if available,reasonably likely to determine fair value. When observable market prices do not exist, we estimate fair value. Our valuation methods and inputs consider factors such as types of underlying assets or liabilities, rates of estimated credit losses, interest rate or discount rate and collateral. Our best estimate of fair value involves assumptions including, but not limited to, various performance indicators, such as historical and projected default and recovery rates, credit ratings, current delinquency rates, loan-to-value ratios and the possibility of obligor refinancing.

At the end of each quarter, we assess the valuation hierarchy for each asset or liability measured. From time to time, assets or liabilities may be transferred within hierarchy levels due to changes in availability of observable market inputs to measure fair value at the measurement date. Transfers into or out of hierarchy levels are based upon the fair value at the beginning of the reporting period.

We periodically review our investment portfolio to determine whether unrealized losses on securities are temporary, based on evaluations of the creditworthiness of the issuers or guarantors, and underlying collateral, as applicable. In addition, we consider the continuing performance of the securities. We recognize credit losses through the income statement. If management believes market value losses are temporary and that we have the ability and intention to hold those securities to maturity, we recognize the reduction in other comprehensive income, through equity.

We account for income taxes under the liability method whereby we determine deferred tax assets and liabilities based on the difference between the carrying values on our financial statements and the tax basis of assets and liabilities as measured by the enacted tax rates which will be in effect when these differences reverse. Deferred tax expense (benefit) is the result of changes in deferred tax assets and liabilities. We currently use the tax expenses as calculated on year-to-date numbers, since small changes in annual estimates would have a significant change in the annual effective rate.

~~Financial Statement Restatement; Regulatory Actions~~

We have adjusted our financial statement presentation for items related to discontinued operations. Separately, we have restated our financial statements for periods from 2010 through September 30, 2014, the last date through which financial statements previously had been filed prior to our 2015 filing of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014. The restatement reflected the recognition of provisions for loan losses and loan charge-offs for discontinued operations in periods earlier than those in which those charges were initially recognized. The majority of these loan charges were originally recognized in 2014, primarily in the third quarter, when commercial lending operations were discontinued. An additional $28.5 million of discontinued operations losses that were not previously reported were included within these periods. Also, $12.7 million of losses incurred in 2015 related to loans that were resolved

before the issuance date of our financial statements and were reflected in our 2014 financial statements. Substantially all of the losses and corresponding restatement adjustments resulted from the discontinued commercial loan operations.

The Bank has entered into a Stipulation and Consent to the Issuance of a Consent Order, or the 2014 Consent Order, with the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, or FDIC, which became effective on September 5, 2014. The Bank took this action without admitting or denying any charges of unsafe or unsound banking practices or violations of law or regulation relating to the Bank’s BSA compliance program.

The 2014 Consent Order requires the Bank to take certain affirmative actions to comply with its BSA obligations, among them: appoint a qualified BSA/OFAC (Office of Foreign Assets Control) officer; revise the written BSA Compliance Program; develop and implement additional policies and procedures for suspicious activity monitoring and reporting; review and enhance customer due diligence and risk assessment processes; review past account activity to determine whether suspicious activity was properly identified and reported; strengthen internal controls, including augmenting oversight by the Bank’s Board of Directors of BSA activities; establish an independent testing program; and develop policies and procedures to govern staffing and training for BSA compliance.

To date, the Bank has implemented multiple upgrades that address the requirements of the 2014 Consent Order, such as appointing a qualified BSA/OFAC officer, increasing oversight and staffing of the BSA compliance function, improving practices and procedures to monitor and report transactions, and increasing training, as well as adopting an independent testing program to ensure adherence to more effective BSA standards.

Until the Bank submits to the FDIC (and the FDIC approves) a BSA report summarizing the completion of its corrective actions, the 2014 Consent Order places some restrictions on certain activities as follows: the Bank is restricted from signing and boarding new independent sales organizations, issuing new non-benefit related reloadable prepaid card programs, establishing new distribution channels for existing non-benefit reloadable prepaid card programs and originating Automated Clearing House transactions for new merchant-related payments. Until we receive the FDIC’s approval, restrictions in these specific areas may potentially impact their growth. We do not believe that these restrictions will have a material impact on current revenue levels. The Bank utilized one primary consultant related to its BSA-AML (Anti-Money Laundering) program refinement and one primary consultant related to conducting a lookback review of historical transactions to confirm that suspicious activity was properly identified and reported in accordance with applicable law. The consultant assisting with the BSA-AML program refinement completed its work in 2014. The consultant performing the BSA lookback completed its work in July 2016, and no additional related fees are expected to be incurred. Suspicious activity reports resulting from the lookback have been filed.

On August 27, 2015, the Bank entered into an Amendment to Consent Order, or the Amendment, with the FDIC, amending the 2014 Consent Order. The Bank took this action without admitting or denying any additional charges of unsafe or unsound banking practices or violations of law or regulation relating to continued weaknesses in the Bank’s BSA compliance program. The Amendment provides that the Bank may not declare or pay any dividend without the prior written consent of the FDIC and for certain assurances regarding management.

On May 11, 2015, the Federal Reserve issued a letter, or the Supervisory Letter, to the Bank as a result of the 2014 Consent Order and the Amendment, (which, at the time of the Supervisory Letter, was in proposed form), which provides that we may not pay any dividends on our common stock, make any distributions to our European entities or make any interest payments on our trust preferred securities, without the prior written approval of the Federal Reserve. It further provides that we may not incur any debt (excluding payables in the ordinary course of business) or redeem any shares of our stock, without the prior written approval of the Federal Reserve. The Federal Reserve approved the payment of the interest on our trust preferred securities which was due September 15, 2017. Future payments are subject~~to future approval by the Federal Reserve.~~

~~On December 23, 2015, the Bank~~ entered into a Stipulation and Consent to the Issuance of an Amended Consent Order, Order for Restitution, and Order to Pay Civil Money Penalty with the FDIC, which we refer to as the 2015 Consent Order. The Bank took this action without admitting or denying any charges of violations of law or regulation. The 2015 Consent Order supercedes in its entirety the terms of a previous consent order entered into in 2012.

The 2015 Consent Order was based on FDIC allegations regarding electronic fund transfer, or EFT, error resolution practices, account termination practices and fee practices of various third parties with whom the Bank had previously provided, or currently provides, deposit-related products which we refer to as Third Parties. The specific operational practices of the third parties identified by the FDIC were the following: practices related to the termination of a third-party rewards program tied to deposit accounts, including the timing of the notice of termination, and the disclosure of the effects of such termination on the consumer’s ability to obtain unredeemed rewards; practices performed by third parties related to the time frames within which we must respond to a consumer’s notice of error related to electronic transactions related to various types of deposit accounts; and, practices related to the timing and frequency of disclosed account fees and the manner by which the accountholder is notified of these fees in periodic statements which are generated by third parties. The 2015 Consent Order continues the Bank's obligations originally set forth in the 2012 Consent Order, including its obligations to increase board oversight of the Bank's compliance management system, or CMS, improve the Bank's CMS, enhance its

~~internal audit program, increase its management and oversight of Third Parties, and correct any apparent violations of law.~~ The 2015 Consent Order also directs the Bank’s Board to establish a Complaint and Error Claim Oversight and Review Committee, which we refer to as the Complaint and Error Claim Committee, to review and oversee the Bank’s processes and practices for handling, monitoring and resolving consumer complaints and EFT error claims (whether received directly or through Third Parties) and to review management's plans for correcting any weaknesses that may be found in such processes and practices; and implement a corrective action plan regarding those prepaid cardholders who asserted or attempted to assert EFT error claims and to provide restitution to cardholders harmed by EFT error resolution practices. The Bank’s Board of Directors appointed the required Complaint and Error Claim Committee on January 29, 2016. The Bank corrective action plan is in process.

We received a subpoena from the SEC, dated March 22, 2016, relating to an investigation by the SEC of the restatement of our financial statements for the years ended December 31, 2010 through December 31, 2013 and the interim periods ended March 31, 2014, September 30, 2014 and September 30, 2014, which restatement was filed with the SEC on September 28, 2015, and the facts and circumstances underlying the restatement. We are cooperating fully with the SEC's investigation. The costs to respond to the subpoena and cooperate with the SEC's investigation have been material, and we expect such costs to continue to be material at least through the completion of the SEC’s investigation.

On October 5, 2016, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) released its final Prepaid Card Rule (Final Prepaid Rule), which it first proposed by publication on December 23, 2014. The general effective date of the Final Prepaid Rule was October 1, 2017, but applicability of certain requirements of the Final Prepaid Rule are delayed until October 1, 2018. However, on April 20, 2017 the CFPB released a final rule delaying the general effective date of the Final Prepaid Rule until April 1, 2018. The Final Prepaid Rule regulates certain prepaid products, including physical cards as well as codes and other access devices. The Final Prepaid Rule did not materially deviate from the terms of the proposed rule that we have disclosed in previous filings. The Final Prepaid Rule among other things, causes prepaid products to be fully-covered by Regulation E, which implements the Electronic Fund Transfer Act, and to be covered by Regulation Z, which implements the Truth in Lending Act, to the extent the prepaid product accesses a “credit” feature.

The Final Prepaid Rule and related commentary is over 1,600 pages in length and provides significant discussion, materials and commentary that we are currently assessing. The Final Prepaid Rule includes a significant number of changes to the regulatory framework for prepaid products, some of which include: (a) establishing a definition of “prepaid account” within Regulation E that includes reloadable and non-reloadable physical cards, as well as codes or other devices, and focuses on how the product is issued and used; (b) modifying Regulation E to require that short form and long form disclosures be provided to a consumer prior to a consumer agreeing to acquire a prepaid account with certain exceptions and with specified forms that, if used, would provide a safe harbor for financial institutions; (c) extending to prepaid accounts the periodic transaction history and statement requirements of Regulation E, with certain specified permissible alternatives to the provision of periodic statements; (d) extending the error resolution and limited liability provisions of Regulation E to prepaid cards, with some modifications specific to prepaid cards; (e) requiring financial institutions to provide prepaid account agreements to the CFPB and to either post them to the issuer’s website or provide them upon request of the consumer in specified manner and timeframes; (f) extending Regulation Z’s credit card rules and disclosure requirements to prepaid accounts that provide overdraft protection and other credit features and incorporating into Regulation Z a new definition of “hybrid prepaid-credit card”; (g) requiring an issuer to obtain a prepaid account holder’s consent prior to adding overdraft services or other credit features and prohibiting the issuer from adding overdraft services or other credit features for at least 30 calendar days after a consumer registers the prepaid account; and (h) prohibiting the application of different terms and conditions, such as charging different fees, to a prepaid account depending on whether the consumer elects to link the prepaid account to overdraft services or other credit features.

The Final Prepaid Rule represents a material change in the rules and regulations governing prepaid cards. We rely on prepaid cards as the largest single component of our deposits and the largest single component of our non-interest income. We are continuing to evaluate the Prepaid Card Rule and the impact it may have on our business and our results of operations. We are in the process of evaluating and building implementation plans for the Prepaid Card Rule and, as such, we cannot reasonably quantify the financial impact, if any, that implementation of the Prepaid Card Rule may have on the Bank’s business, financial condition or results of operations. Our critical accounting policies and estimates as of September 30, 2023 remain unchanged from those presented in the 2022 Form 10-K under Part II, Item 7. “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.”

~~On July 10, 2017,~~LIBOR Transition

The Company discontinued LIBOR-based originations in 2021. Since then, all LIBOR based instruments on the ~~CFPB~~balance sheet have been successfully transitioned to alternative indices with no material impact.

Recent Developments

In the fourth quarter of 2023, we announced a significant increase in our planned stock repurchases for 2024. As a means of returning capital to shareholders, the Company implemented stock repurchase programs which totaled $40.0 million, $60.0 million and $100.0 million, respectively, in 2021, 2022 and 2023, with $200 million planned for 2024. The planned amounts of such repurchases are determined in the fourth quarter of the preceding year by assessing the impact of budgetary earnings projections on regulatory capital requirements. The excess of projected earnings over amounts required to maintain capital requirements is the maximum available for capital return to shareholders, barring any need to retain capital for other purposes. A significant portion of such excess earnings has been utilized for stock repurchases in the amounts noted above, while cash dividends have not been paid. In determining whether capital is returned through stock repurchases or cash dividends, the Company calculates a maximum share repurchase price, based upon comparisons with what it concludes to be other exemplar peer share price valuations, with further consideration of internal growth projections. As these share prices, which are updated at least annually, have not been reached, capital return has consisted solely of stock repurchases. Exemplar share price comparisons are based upon multiples of earnings per share over time, with further consideration of returns on equity and assets. While repurchase amounts are planned in the fourth quarter of the preceding year, repurchases may be modified or terminated at any time, should capital need to be conserved.

The Company owns one trust preferred security, which it purchased in 2006, and which has a par value of $10.0 million. The security was issued by an aggregator of insurance lines in run-off, including workmen’s compensation lines. In the third quarter of 2023, the Company was notified that interest payments were being deferred on the security, as permitted under the terms of the trust preferred indenture which permits such deferrals for up to twenty consecutive quarters. At the end of the deferral, deferred interest must be repaid, including interest on the deferred interest. The Company has requested additional updated financial information from the aggregator to permit a ~~final rule to regulate arbitration agreements in contracts for specified consumer financial product and services (Arbitration Rule). The Arbitration Rule prohibits covered providers~~more accurate valuation of ~~certain consumer financial products and services from using an agreement with a consumer that provides for arbitration of any future dispute between~~ the parties to bar the consumer from filing or participating in a class action concerning the covered consumer financial product or service. The Arbitration Rule also requires covered providers that are involved in an arbitration pursuant to a pre-dispute arbitration agreement to submit specified arbitral recordssecurity subsequent to the ~~CFPB together with specified court records.~~interest deferral. The ~~Arbitration Rule becomes effective on March 19, 2018; however, on November 1, 2017, President Trump signed legislation~~aggregator has indicated that it is attempting to ~~repeal~~

identify all holders of the ~~Arbitration Rule.~~

~~On October 17, 2017, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (the “FDIC”) informed The Bancorp Bank (the “Bank”), a wholly owned subsidiary of The Bancorp, Inc. (the “Company”),~~security and that it intends to ~~pursue an Order For Restitution (“Restitution Order”)~~provide such financial information concurrently to all holders. The Company has placed the security in non-accrual status and ~~Order~~will evaluate the security for potential loss in the fourth quarter of 2023, when the aggregator indicated that the financial information would be distributed. While the security has previously been subject to ~~Pay Civil Money Penalty (“CMP Order”) in an amount~~interest deferral which was repaid, there can be no assurance that repayment will occur for the current deferral. Further, depending upon the financial information provided by the aggregator, a loss of up to ~~$2,576,000. The FDIC’s action principally emanates from one~~the full amount of principal, or $10.0 million, may be recognized in the ~~Bank’s third-party payment processors (“Third Party Processor”) suffering an internal system programming glitch. This~~fourth quarter of 2023.

inadvertently resulted in consumers that engaged in signature-based point of sale transactions during the period from December 2010 to November 2014 being charged a greater fee than what was disclosed by the Bank. Impacted consumers are being reimbursed by the Third Party Processor at its own expense. The Restitution Order would require the Bank to make such reimbursements if not otherwise made by the Third Party Processor, however, the Bank is indemnified by the Third Party Processor for such reimbursements. Although the Bank is still evaluating its position with regard to the Restitution Order and the CMP Order, the Company accrued $2,500,000 of related expense in its financial statements for the quarter ended September 30, 2017 in connection with the CMP Order. Any amounts owed from the CMP Order would not be subject to any indemnification or recovery from any third party.

Results of Operations

~~Third~~

Comparison of third quarter ~~2017~~2023 to third quarter ~~2016~~2022

Net ~~Income:~~ The improvement in net income in third quarter 2017 compared to third quarter 2017 reflected revenue growth, expense reductions, the conclusion of BSA lookback expense in 2016 and credit related charges in discontinued operations in 2016. Income

Net income ~~from continuing operations~~ for the third quarter of ~~2017~~2023 was ~~$6.8~~$50.1 million, or ~~$0.12~~$0.92 per diluted share, compared to ~~net loss of $1.5~~$30.6 million, or ~~$0.03~~$0.54 per diluted share, for the third quarter of ~~2016. After discontinued operations, net~~2022. Income before income ~~for~~taxes was $66.5 million in the third quarter of ~~2017 was $7.3 million~~2023 compared to ~~a net loss of $25.6~~$42.4 million ~~for~~in the third quarter of ~~2016. Net interest income for the third quarter of 2017 compared to the third quarter of 2016~~2022. Income increased ~~to $27.9 million from $23.5 million~~between those respective periods primarily as a result of higher loan balances and higher yields, reflecting the Federal Reserve’s rate increases. The provision for loan and lease losses increased $50,000 to $800,000 in the third quarter of 2017 compared to $750,000 in the third quarter of 2016. Non-interestnet interest income, ~~(excluding security gains and losses) increased$9.6 million,~~ which ~~resulted~~was primarily from an increase in gain on sale of loans into two securitizations. Non-interest expense in the third quarter of 2017 was comparable to third quarter 2016. Cost reductions in data processing, consulting and other expenses were largely offsetdriven by a $2.5 million civil money penalty in third quarter 2017 (see note 13 to the financial statements) and a $1.1 million contractual exit fee. The exit fee was for a data processing contracts which will be significantly exceeded by future savings. Lower data processing expense reflected the impact of Federal Reserve rate increases on the loan and securities portfolios. Variable rate loans and securities comprise the majority of the Company’s earning assets, and while they reprice on a renegotiated data processing contract and the phase out of an affinity program. A $21.5 million loss from discontinued operations in third quarter 2016 resulted primarily from the writedown of a $42 million loan secured by a shopping mall. Diluted income per share was $0.13 in the third quarter of 2017 comparedlagged basis, they adjust more fully than deposits to ~~$0.54 loss per share in the third quarter of 2016 primarily reflecting the factors noted above.~~ Federal Reserve rate changes.

Net Interest ~~Income:~~Income

Our net interest income for the third quarter of ~~2017~~2023 increased ~~to $27.9 million, an increase of $4.4~~$24.2 million, or ~~18.5%~~37.5%, to $88.9 million from ~~$23.5~~$64.7 million in the third quarter of ~~2016.~~2022. Our interest income for the third quarter of ~~2017~~2023 increased to ~~$31.9~~$129.0 million, an increase of ~~$5.2~~$45.0 million, or ~~19.4%~~53.7%, from ~~$26.7~~$83.9 million for the third quarter of ~~2016.~~2022. The increase in interest income resulted primarily from ~~higher~~an increase in loan ~~balances~~ and ~~higher yields. Our~~securities yields resulting from the aforementioned Federal Reserve rate increases, as our average loans and leases ~~increased~~decreased to ~~$1.84~~$5.61 billion for the third quarter of ~~2017~~2023 from ~~$1.68~~$5.91 billion for the third quarter of ~~2016, an increase~~2022, a decrease of ~~$154.7 million.~~$300.2 million, or 5.1%. Related interest income increased ~~$3.7~~$35.0 million on a tax equivalent basis. In the third quarter of 2023, net paydowns of SBLOC and IBLOC were experienced, which partially offset the impact of higher rates and loan growth in other categories. At September 30, 2023, the respective balances of SBLOC and IBLOC loans were $1.01 billion and $712.6 million, respectively, compared to $1.27 billion and $1.10 billion at September 30, 2022. Continuing decreases in these balances will result in lower interest income, to the extent they are not replaced by loan growth in other categories. Additionally, overall net interest income may be reduced from current levels should the Federal Reserve begin lowering interest rates. The balance of our commercial loans, at fair value also decreased as a result of non-SBA commercial real estate bridge loan repayments. In the third quarter of 2021, we resumed originating such loans, referred to as real estate bridge loans which are included in loans, net on the balance sheet and which are held at amortized cost.

Of the total $35.0 million increase in ~~average~~loan interest income on a tax equivalent basis, the largest increases were $7.5 million for SBLOC, IBLOC and investment advisor financing, $20.5 million for all real estate bridge loans, ~~reflected organic growth in~~$2.8 million for leasing, and $4.1 million for SBA ~~and SBLOC lending.~~ loans. Our average investment securities ~~decreased to $1.25 billion~~of $771.4 million for the third quarter of ~~2017~~2023 decreased $56.4 million from ~~$1.42 billion~~$827.7 million for the third quarter of ~~2016, as investment securities were replaced with higher yielding loans. Notwithstanding the decrease in average balances, related~~2022. Related tax equivalent interest income increased ~~$412,000~~$2.9 million, primarily reflecting an increase in yields. Higher yields on ~~a tax equivalent basis as a result of higher yields. Yields on both~~ loans and ~~investment~~ securities ~~increased as a result of~~reflected the continuing impact of ~~the~~ Federal ~~Reserve’s~~Reserve rate increases as variable rate loans and securities repriced to higher rates. Federal Reserve rate changes had an immediate impact on cost of funds, while their impact on variable rate loans ~~and securities. Rates paid on deposits and resulting~~lags. Generally, interest expense is contractually adjusted ~~only partially to the Federal Reserve’s~~daily. The majority of our loans and securities are variable rate ~~increases.~~and generally reprice monthly or quarterly, although some reprice over several years.

Our net interest margin (calculated by dividing net interest income by average ~~interest earning~~interest-earning assets) for the third quarter of ~~2017 increased~~2023 was 5.07% compared to ~~3.26% from 2.69% in~~3.69% for the third quarter of ~~2016,~~2022, an increase of 57138 basis points. While the yield on interest-earning assets increased 256 basis points, the cost of deposits and interest bearing liabilities increased 131 basis points, or a net change of 125 basis points. The more pronounced increase in the net interest margin compared to the net change reflected ~~higher yields on loans and investment securities reflecting~~ the impact of higher rates on assets funded by equity. Balances at the ~~aforementioned~~ Federal Reserve ~~rate increases on variable rate~~generally earn lower rates of interest than loans and securities. Average interest-earning deposits at the Federal Reserve Bank increased $372.5 million, or 139.3%, to $639.9 million in the third quarter of 2023 from $267.4 million in the third quarter of 2022. In the third quarter of ~~2017,~~2023, the average yield on our loans increased to ~~4.66%~~7.89% from ~~4.19%~~5.12% for the third quarter of ~~2016,~~2022, an increase of 47277 basis points. Yields on taxable investment securities in the third quarter of ~~2017~~2023 increased to ~~2.86%~~5.02% compared to ~~2.43%~~3.30% for the third quarter of ~~2016,~~2022, an increase of 43172 basis points. The net interest margin also benefited from the reinvestment of maturities of investment securities into higher yielding loans. Average interest earning deposits at the Federal Reserve Bank increased $42.5 million, or 13.1% to $366.7 million in the third quarter of 2017 from $324.2 million in the third quarter of 2016. That difference reflects a minimal percentage of total deposits, and resulted primarily from daily fluctuations in deposits and loans. The interest cost of total deposits and interest bearing liabilities increased to 0.43% for the third quarter of 2017 as compared to 0.33% in the third quarter of 2016. The cost of deposits increased significantly less than the increase in variable rates on loans and investments primarily due to contractual provisions related to prepaid card deposits. Those contracts result in only partial adjustment to Federal Reserve rate increases.

Average Daily ~~Balances.~~ Balances

The following table presents the average daily balances of assets, liabilities and ~~stockholders’~~shareholders’ equity and the respective interest earned or paid on interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities, as well as average annualized rates, for the periods indicated:



	Three months ended September 30,												Three months ended September 30,
	2023						2022						2023 vs 2022
	Average				Average		Average				Average
	Balance		Interest⁽¹⁾		Rate		Balance		Interest⁽¹⁾		Rate		Due to Volume		Due to Rate		Total
	(Dollars in thousands)
Assets:
Interest-earning assets:
Loans, net of deferred loan fees and costs⁽²⁾	$	5,603,514	$	110,506		7.89%	$	5,904,996	$	75,536		5.12%	$	(3,639)	$	38,609	$	34,970
Leases-bank qualified⁽³⁾		4,585		110		9.60%		3,299		55		6.67%		26		29		55
Investment securities-taxable		768,364		9,647		5.02%		824,178		6,792		3.30%		(424)		3,279		2,855
Investment securities-nontaxable⁽³⁾		3,005		50		6.66%		3,559		31		3.48%		(4)		23		19
Interest-earning deposits at Federal Reserve Bank		639,946		8,689		5.43%		267,424		1,525		2.28%		3,598		3,566		7,164
Net interest-earning assets		7,019,414		129,002		7.35%		7,003,456		83,939		4.79%

Allowance for credit losses		(23,147)						(19,111)
Other assets		338,085						212,078
	$	7,334,352					$	7,196,423						(443)		45,506		45,063

Liabilities and shareholders' equity:
Deposits:
Demand and interest checking	$	6,229,668	$	37,913		2.43%	$	5,545,115	$	12,726		0.92%		1,752		23,435		25,187
Savings and money market		56,538		518		3.66%		479,260		2,792		2.33%		(6,484)		4,210		(2,274)
Time		—		—		—		87,562		547		2.50%		(547)		—		(547)
Total deposits		6,286,206		38,431		2.45%		6,111,937		16,065		1.05%

Short-term borrowings		—		—		—		200,423		1,235		2.46%		(1,235)		—		(1,235)
Repurchase agreements		41		—		—		41		—		—		—		—		—
Long-term borrowings		9,889		128		5.18%		39,035		506		5.19%		(377)		(1)		(378)
Subordinated debt		13,401		293		8.75%		13,401		177		5.28%		—		116		116
Senior debt		95,714		1,234		5.16%		98,910		1,279		5.17%		(41)		(4)		(45)
Total deposits and liabilities		6,405,251		40,086		2.50%		6,463,747		19,262		1.19%

Other liabilities		167,673						72,539
Total liabilities		6,572,924						6,536,286						(6,932)		27,756		20,824

Shareholders' equity		761,428						660,137
	$	7,334,352					$	7,196,423

Net interest income on tax equivalent basis⁽³⁾			$	88,916					$	64,677			$	6,489	$	17,750	$	24,239

Tax equivalent adjustment				34						18

Net interest income			$	88,882					$	64,659

Net interest margin⁽³⁾						5.07%						3.69%

⁽¹⁾Interest on loans for 2023 and 2022 includes $7,000 and $21,000, respectively, of interest and fees on PPP loans.
⁽²⁾Includes commercial loans, at fair value. All periods include non-accrual loans.
⁽³⁾Full taxable equivalent basis, using 21% respective statutory federal tax rates in 2023 and 2022.

Three months ended September 30,

2017

2016

Average

Average

Average

Average

Balance

Interest

Rate

Balance

Interest

Rate

(dollars in thousands)
Assets:

Interest earning assets:

Loans net of unearned fees and costs **

$                 1,816,751

$             21,147

4.66%

$                 1,661,807

$             17,425

4.19%
Leases - bank qualified*

20,787

419

8.06%

21,006

418

7.96%
Investment securities-taxable

1,235,615

8,847

2.86%

1,373,776

8,350

2.43%
Investment securities-nontaxable*

13,238

133

4.02%

48,683

218

1.79%
Interest earning deposits at Federal Reserve Bank

366,724

1,190

1.30%

324,179

397

0.49%
Federal funds sold and securities purchased under agreement to resell

65,008

371

2.28%

39,392

146

1.48%
Net interest earning assets

3,518,123

32,107

3.65%

3,468,843

26,954

3.11%

Allowance for loan and lease losses

(6,961)

(5,267)

Assets held for sale from discontinued operations

325,912

3,098

3.80%

459,400

3,891

3.39%
Other assets

235,070

246,171

$                 4,072,144

$                 4,169,147

Liabilities and shareholders' equity:

Deposits:

Demand and interest checking

$                 3,224,167

$               3,136

0.39%

$                 3,249,801

$               2,379

0.29%
Savings and money market

439,688

552

0.50%

392,045

423

0.43%
Time

-

-

0.00%

76,931

104

0.54%
Total deposits

3,663,855

3,688

0.40%

3,718,777

2,906

0.31%

Short-term borrowings

51,413

175

1.36%

102,243

153

0.60%
Repurchase agreements

189

-

0.00%

376

-

0.00%
Subordinated debt

13,401

150

4.48%

13,401

131

3.91%
Total deposits and interest bearing liabilities

3,728,858

4,013

0.43%

3,834,797

3,190

0.33%

Other liabilities

8,046

19,670

Total liabilities

3,736,904

3,854,467

Shareholders' equity

335,240

314,680

$                 4,072,144

$                 4,169,147

Net interest income on tax equivalent basis *

$             31,192

$             27,655

Tax equivalent adjustment

193

222

Net interest income

$             30,999

$             27,433

Net interest margin *

3.26%

2.69%

* Full taxable equivalent basis, using a 35% statutory tax rate.

** Includes loans held for sale.

For the third quarter of ~~2017,~~2023, average ~~interest earning~~interest-earning assets increased to ~~$3.52~~$7.02 billion, an increase of ~~$49.3~~$16.0 million, or ~~1.4%~~0.2%, from ~~$3.47~~$7.00 billion in the third quarter of ~~2016.~~2022. The increase reflected ~~increases in~~increased average interest-earning deposits at the Federal Reserve Bank of $372.5 million partially offset by decreased average balances of loans and leases of ~~$154.7~~$300.2 million, or ~~9.2%~~5.1%, and ~~$42.5~~decreased average investment securities of $56.4 million, or 13.1%, of average interest earning deposits at the Federal Reserve Bank, net of decreases in average balances of investment securities. For third quarter 2017 compared to third quarter 2016, average securities decreased $173.6 million, or 12.2%, to $1.25 billion from $1.42 billion.6.8%. For those respective periods, average demand and interest checking deposits ~~decreased $25.6~~increased $684.6 million,

or ~~0.8%, to $3.22 billion from $3.25 billion. The~~12.3%. A $422.7 million decrease in average savings and money market balances reflected the ~~planned exit~~sweeping of ~~certain less profitable deposit relationships, which was partially offset~~deposits off our balance sheet to other institutions. Such sweeps are utilized to optimize diversity within our funding structure by ~~growth in payments related~~managing the

percentage of individual client deposits to total deposits. The interest expense shown for demand and interest checking is primarily comprised of interest paid to our affinity groups.

Provision for ~~Loan and Lease~~Credit Losses.

Our provision for ~~loan and lease~~credit losses was ~~$800,000~~$1.8 million for the third quarter of ~~2017~~2023 compared to ~~$750,000~~a provision of $822,000 for the third quarter of ~~2016.~~2022. The ~~allowance for loan losses increased to $7.3~~ACL was $24.1 million, or ~~0.53%~~0.46% of total loans, at September 30, ~~2017, from $6.3~~2023, compared to $22.4 million, or ~~0.52%~~0.41% of total loans, at December 31, ~~2016~~. 2022. The higher ratio at September 30, 2023 reflected the impact of higher net charge-offs, while total loans outstanding decreased. We believe that our ~~allowance~~ACL is adequate to cover expected ~~losses~~losses. For more information about our provision and ~~allowance for loan and lease losses~~ACL and our loss experience, see “Financial ~~Condition-Allowance~~Condition – Allowance for ~~loan and lease losses”, “-Net charge-offs,~~Credit Losses,” “– Net Charge-offs,” and ~~“-Non-performing loans, loans~~“– Non-performing Loans, Loans 90 days ~~delinquent~~Delinquent and ~~still accruing,~~Still Accruing, OREO, Modified Loans and ~~troubled debt restructurings,~~Troubled Debt Restructurings,” below and ~~Note 6~~“Note 6. Loans” to the unaudited consolidated financial ~~statements.~~ statements herein.

Non-Interest ~~Income.~~Income

Non-interest income was ~~$28.5~~$26.8 million in the third quarter of ~~2017~~2023 compared to ~~$18.9~~$23.4 million in the third quarter of ~~2016 before gains on sale of investment securities of $506,000 in the third quarter of 2017 and $981,000 in the third quarter of 2016.~~2022. The ~~$9.6~~$3.4 million, or ~~50.6%~~14.3%, increase between those respective periods reflected an ~~$815,000 decrease~~increase in the change in value of investment in unconsolidated entity. Gain on sale of loans increased to $11.4 million for the third quarter of 2017 from $903,000 in the third quarter of 2016 which resulted primarily from the sale of loans into a securitization in 2017.prepaid, debit card and related fees. Prepaid, debit card and related fees increased ~~by $242,000~~$2.3 million, or ~~2.0%~~12.2%, to $12.5 million for the third quarter of 2017 compared to $12.2 million in third quarter 2016. The increase reflected organic growth which more than offset the impact of a client whose ownership changed and clients who decided to terminate card programs. Service fees on deposit accounts increased $190,000 or 12.6% to $1.7 million for the third quarter of 2017 from $1.5 million for the third quarter of 2016, reflecting increases in service charges on safe harbor individual retirement accounts. Leasing income increased $117,000 or 19.9% to $705,000 for the third quarter of 2017 from $588,000 for the third quarter of 2016, which reflected higher gains on disposition of leased vehicles in 2017. Affinity fees decreased by $816,000, or 74.8% to $275,000 for the third quarter of 2017 from $1.1 million for the third quarter of 2016. The decrease resulted from the exit of one affinity relationship whose ownership had changed. Other non-interest income increased $64,000, or 20.5% to $376,000 for the third quarter of 2017 from $312,000 in the third quarter of 2016.

~~Non-Interest Expense~~. Total non-interest expense was $43.9 million for the third quarter of 2017, a decrease of $288,000, or 0.7% compared to $44.2 million for the third quarter of 2016. Decreases in ongoing data processing expenses, consulting fees and BSA lookback expense were partially offset by a proposed $2.5 million civil money penalty which was accrued, a $1.1 million data processing contract exit fee and higher legal expenses. The exit of the data processing contract will result in future savings significantly greater than the exit fee and the BSA lookback expenses concluded in third quarter 2016. The civil money penalty resulted from a programming glitch within one of the Bank’s third party processors. As a result, a higher fee was assessed to consumers for certain point of sale transactions during the period from December 2010 to November 2014. Salaries and employee benefits increased to $21.8 million for the third quarter of 2017, an increase of $280,000, or 1.3% from $21.5 million for the third quarter of 2016. The increase reflected incentive compensation expense related to the gain on sale of loans into securitizations and other revenue and performance based compensation. Those increases offset the impact of staffing levels which had been reduced2023, compared to ~~the prior year in most departments. Depreciation and amortization decreased $161,000 or 13.0% to $1.1~~$19.2 million in the third quarter of ~~2017~~2022. The increase reflected higher transaction volume from ~~$1.2~~new clients and organic growth from existing clients. ACH, card and other payment processing fees increased $323,000, or 14.5%, to $2.6 million for the third quarter of 2023, compared to $2.2 million in the third quarter of ~~2016.~~2022, reflecting an increase in rapid funds transfer volume.

Leasing related income increased $719,000, or 68.6%, to $1.8 million for the third quarter of 2023 from $1.0 million for the third quarter of 2022, reflecting an increase in the volume of vehicles sold.

Other non-interest income increased $194,000, or 85.1%, to $422,000 for the third quarter of 2023 from $228,000 in the third quarter of 2022 primarily reflecting increased prepayment and sales fees on small business loans.

Non-Interest Expense

Total non-interest expense was $47.5 million for the third quarter of 2023, an increase of $2.6 million, or 5.9%, compared to $44.8 million for the third quarter of 2022. The ~~decrease~~majority of the increase resulted from higher salaries and employee benefits expense, which reflected ~~reduced spending on fixed assets~~higher numbers of staff in financial crimes, compliance and ~~equipment.~~ information technology (“IT”) due to increases in deposit transaction volume and the development of new products. The increase also reflected higher stock compensation expense and less expense deferral related to loan origination costs as a result of lower loan production.

The following table presents the principal categories of non-interest expense for the periods indicated:


	For the three months ended September 30,
	2023		2022		Increase (Decrease)		Percent Change
	(Dollars in thousands)
Salaries and employee benefits	$	30,475	$	28,001	$	2,474		8.8%
Depreciation and amortization		644		685		(41)		(6.0)%
Rent and related occupancy cost		1,510		1,268		242		19.1%
Data processing expense		1,404		1,292		112		8.7%
Printing and supplies		82		154		(72)		(46.8)%
Audit expense		446		366		80		21.9%
Legal expense		1,203		907		296		32.6%
Civil money penalty		—		1,750		(1,750)		(100.0)%
Amortization of intangible assets		99		99		—		—
FDIC insurance		806		679		127		18.7%
Software		4,427		4,001		426		10.6%
Insurance		1,321		1,314		7		0.5%
Telecom and IT network communications		305		368		(63)		(17.1)%
Consulting		448		339		109		32.2%
Writedowns and other losses on other real estate owned		131		—		131		100.0%
Other		4,158		3,607		551		15.3%
Total non-interest expense	$	47,459	$	44,830	$	2,629		5.9%

Changes in categories of non-interest expense were as follows:

Salaries and employee benefits expense increased to $30.5 million for the third quarter of 2023, an increase of $2.5 million, or 8.8%, from $28.0 million for the third quarter of 2022.

Depreciation and amortization expense decreased $41,000, or 6.0%, to $644,000 in the third quarter of 2023 from $685,000 in the third quarter of 2022.

Rent and related occupancy ~~decreased $270,000~~cost increased $242,000, or ~~16.5%~~19.1%, to $1.5 million in the third quarter of 2023 from $1.3 million in the third quarter of 2022, reflecting increased IT-related equipment expense.

Data processing expense increased $112,000, or 8.7%, to $1.4 million in the third quarter of ~~2017~~2023 from ~~$1.6~~$1.3 million in the third quarter of ~~2016. The decrease reflected a reduction in leased space~~2022, reflecting higher transaction volume.

Printing and ~~more efficient use of office space.~~ ~~Data processing~~supplies expense decreased ~~by $1.6 million,~~$72,000, or ~~45.1%~~46.8%, to ~~$1.9~~$82,000 in the third quarter of 2023 from $154,000 in the third quarter of 2022.

Audit expense increased $80,000, or 21.9%, to $446,000 in the third quarter of 2023 from $366,000 in the third quarter of 2022.

Legal expense increased $296,000, or 32.6%, to $1.2 million in the third quarter of ~~2017~~2023 from ~~$3.5~~$907,000 in the third quarter of 2022 reflecting increased legal costs related to a request for information related to the Bank’s escheatment practices from the CFPB as described in “Note 14 Legal” to the financial statements. There were also expenses related to enhancements and updates to the Company’s corporate governance processes and new products.

FDIC insurance expense increased $127,000, or 18.7%, to $806,000 for the third quarter of 2023 from $679,000 in the third quarter of 2022, reflecting the impact of increased average assets against which assessment rates are applied. Additionally, in 2023 the FDIC increased its assessment rate by two basis points. The cost of resolving several recent bank failures may result in future increased premiums, or special assessments, which would serve to increase expense in the period assessed.

Software expense increased $426,000, or 10.6%, to $4.4 million in the third quarter of 2016. The decrease reflected the impact of a renegotiated data processing contract and lower account and transaction volume as a result of the planned exit of an affinity program which had changed ownership. It also reflected the impact of the consolidation of our call centers as an efficiency and cost cutting measure. Printing and supplies decreased $543,000 or 65.8% to $282,000 in the third quarter of 20172023 from $825,000 in the third quarter of 2016, which reflected elevated expense in 2016 due to service charge and other communications in that year. Audit expense increased $147,000 or 59.8% to $393,000 in the third quarter of 2017 from $246,000 in the third quarter of 2016 which reflected increased regulatory compliance audit fees. Legal expense increased $1.9 million or 237.1%, to $2.7$4.0 million in the third quarter of ~~2017 from $814,000 in~~2022. The increase reflected higher expenditures for information technology infrastructure including those to service the third quarter of 2016, reflecting costs associated with an SEC subpoena related to the restatement of the financial statements (see “Financial Statements; Regulatory Actions”) and other regulatory related legal fees. Amortization of intangible assets decreased $17,000,payments businesses.

Insurance expense increased $7,000, or ~~4.3%~~0.5%, to $377,000 for the third quarter of 2017 from $394,000 for the third quarter of 2016 reflecting amortization of an intangible resulting from the 2016 purchase of $60 million of lease receivables. FDIC insurance expense decreased $373,000 or 15.3% to $2.1 million for the third quarter of 2017 from $2.4$1.3 million in the third quarter of ~~2016 reflecting a decrease in average deposits and a reduction in rate. Software expense increased $56,000 or 1.8%~~2023 compared to ~~$3.1~~$1.3 million in the third quarter of ~~2017~~2022.

Telecom and IT network communications expense decreased $63,000, or 17.1%, to $305,000 in the third quarter of 2023 from ~~$3.0~~$368,000 in the third quarter of 2022.

Consulting expense increased $109,000, or 32.2%, to $448,000 in the third quarter of 2023 from $339,000 in the third quarter of 2022. The increase reflected expenses related to the Company’s ongoing efforts of documenting and optimizing operational controls.

The $131,000 of writedowns and other losses on OREO reflected the impact of a write-down related to a property sale.

Other non-interest expense increased $550,747, or 15.3%, to $4.2 million in the third quarter of 2016 as a result of additional information technology infrastructure to improve efficiency and scalability, including BSA software required to satisfy regulatory requirements. Insurance expense increased $2,000 or 0.3% to $633,000 in the third quarter 2017 compared to $631,000 in the third quarter of 2016. Telecom and IT network communications decreased $156,000 or 26.8% to $426,000 in the third quarter of 20172023 from $582,000 in the third quarter of 2016. The decrease reflected cost cutting efforts which included the elimination of corporate sponsored cell phones. Consulting decreased $1.2 million or 70.3% to $505,000 in the third quarter of 2017 from $1.7 million in the third quarter of 2016 reflecting reduced regulatory related consulting expense. Other non-interest expense decreased $702,000 or 16.4%, to $3.6 million in the third quarter of ~~2017 from $4.3~~2022. The $550,747 increase primarily reflected the following increases: a. regulatory examination fees of $193,000, b. OREO expense of $142,000 and c. $77,000 in travel expenses, as travel increased post-pandemic.

Income Taxes

Income tax expense was $16.3 million for the third quarter of 2023 compared to $11.8 million in the third quarter of ~~2016,~~2022. The increase resulted primarily from an increase in income, substantially all of which is subject to income tax. A 24.6% effective tax rate in 2023 and a 27.9% effective tax rate in 2022 primarily reflected ~~decreases~~a 21% federal tax rate and the impact of ~~$448,000 for travel and entertainment expenses and $384,000 of customer identification expense.~~various state income taxes. The ~~decrease~~lower rate in ~~travel and entertainment expenses~~2023 reflected the impact of ~~staff reductions and other cost cutting measures. The decrease in customer~~

~~identification expense primarily reflected the exit of one affinity group and reduced health savings volume due to the sale of that business.~~

~~Income Taxes.~~ Income tax expense for continuing operations was $5.5 million for the third quarter of 2017 compared to $55,000 in the third quarter of 2016. The 45% effective tax rate in 2016 primarily was higher than the statutory rate of 34% and reflected the impact of taxesadjustments related to ~~European operations which were being exited~~state taxes in ~~2017.~~multiple states.

~~First~~Comparison of first nine months ~~2017~~2023 to first nine months ~~2016~~2022

Net income ~~from continuing operations~~ for the first nine months of ~~2017~~ 2023 was ~~$30.7~~$148.3 million, or ~~$0.55~~ $2.68 per diluted share, compared to ~~net loss of $29.8~~$90.0 million, or ~~$0.73~~$1.56 per diluted share, for the first nine months of ~~2016. After discontinued operations, net~~2022. Income before income ~~for the first nine months of 2017~~ taxes was ~~$34.1 million~~ compared to net loss of $67.7 million for the first nine months of 2016. Net interest income increased $15.0 million to $80.0 million for the first nine months of 2017 compared to $65.0 million for the first nine months of 2016 primarily as a result of higher loan balances and yields which reflected the Federal Reserve’s rate increases. The provision for loan and lease losses increased $340,000 to $2.2$197.6 million in the first nine months of ~~2017~~2023 compared to ~~$1.8~~$121.7 million in the first nine months of ~~2016. Non-interest~~2022. Income increased between those respective periods primarily as a result of higher net interest income, ~~increased $24.8 million (excluding security gains and losses), from $45.0 million for~~which was primarily driven by the ~~first nine months~~impact of 2016, to $69.8 million. The increase reflected a $12.3 million change in the value of investment in unconsolidated entity and $17.5 million of gain on sale of loans into securitizations in 2017. In 2017, a $2.5 million gainFederal Reserve rate increases on the ~~sale~~loan and securities portfolios. Variable rate loans and securities comprise the majority of ~~our health savings accounts was~~the Company’s earning assets, and while they reprice on a lagged basis, they adjust more fully than ~~offset by a loss of $3.4 million on the sale of our European prepaid operations. A $3.8 million decrease in other income, from $4.7 million in 2016~~deposits to $892,000 in 2017, resulted primarily from a second quarter 2016 gain on the sale of Visa Europe to Visa U.S.A., in which members of Visa Europe shared in the sales proceeds. Non-interest expense reflected a $29.1 million decrease in BSA lookback-related consulting expenses and an $8.3 million decrease in other non interest expenses, which reflected a $4.5 million decrease in salaries and employee benefits and a $2.9 million decrease in data processing expense. Diluted income per share ~~was $0.61 for the~~ ~~first nine months of 2017 compared to diluted loss per share of $1.65 for the first nine months of 2016.~~Federal Reserve rate changes.

Net Interest ~~Income:~~Income

Our net interest income for the first nine months of ~~2017~~2023 increased ~~to $80.0 million, an increase of $15.0~~$89.8 million, or ~~23.1%~~52.2%, to $261.9 million, from ~~$65.0~~$172.1 million in the first nine months of ~~2016.~~2022. Our interest income for the first nine months of ~~2017~~2023 increased to ~~$91.2~~$377.4 million, an increase of ~~$16.8~~

$176.0 million, or ~~22.7%~~87.4%, from ~~$74.3~~$201.4 million for the first nine months of ~~2016.~~2022. The increase in interest income resulted primarily from ~~higher balances of loans~~an increase in loan and ~~higher yields.~~ securities yields resulting from Federal Reserve rate increases.

Our average loans and leases increased ~~$197.8 million~~ to ~~$1.76~~$5.78 billion for the first nine months of ~~2017~~2023 from ~~$1.56~~$5.54 billion for the first nine months of ~~2016, while related~~2022, an increase of $240.6 million, or 4.3%. Related interest income increased ~~$10.1~~$142.9 million on a tax equivalent basis. The increase in average loans reflected ~~organic~~ growth in investment advisor loans, small business, direct lease financing, and real estate bridge loans. In the first nine months of 2023, net paydowns of SBLOC and IBLOC were experienced, which partially offset the impact of higher rates and loan growth in other categories. Continuing decreases in these balances will result in lower interest income, to the extent they are not replaced by loan growth in other categories. Additionally, overall net interest income may be reduced from current levels should the Federal Reserve begin lowering interest rates. The balance of our commercial loans, at fair value also decreased, as a result of non-SBA commercial real estate bridge loan repayments. In the third quarter of 2021, we resumed originating such loans, referred to as real estate bridge loans which are included in loans, net on the balance sheet and which are held at amortized cost.

Of the total $142.9 million increase in loan interest income on a tax equivalent basis, the largest increases were $47.5 million for SBLOC, IBLOC and investment advisor financing, $73.3 million for all real estate bridge loans, $8.7 million for leasing, and $12.5 million for SBA ~~and SBLOC lending.~~ loans. Our average investment securities ~~decreased to $1.28 billion~~of $776.7 million for the first nine months of ~~2017~~2023 decreased $107.3 million from ~~$1.34 billion~~$884.0 million for the first nine months of ~~2016 while related~~2022. Related tax equivalent interest income increased ~~$3.6~~$11.8 million, ~~on a tax equivalent basis as a result of higher~~primarily reflecting an increase in yields. ~~Yields~~Higher yields on ~~both~~ loans and ~~investment~~ securities ~~increased as a result of~~reflected the continuing impact of ~~the~~ Federal ~~Reserve’s~~Reserve rate increases as variable rate loans and securities repriced to higher rates. Federal Reserve rate changes had an immediate impact on cost of funds, while their impact on variable rate loans ~~and securities. Deposit rates and resulting~~lags. Generally, interest expense is contractually adjusted ~~only partially to the Federal Reserve’s~~daily. The majority of our loans and securities are variable rate ~~increases.~~and generally reprice monthly or quarterly, although some reprice over several years.

Our net interest margin (calculated by dividing net interest income by average ~~interest earning~~interest-earning assets) for the first nine months of ~~2017~~2023 was 4.86% compared to 3.32% for the first nine months of 2022, an increase of 154 basis points. While the yield on interest-earning assets increased 312 basis points, the cost of deposits and interest bearing liabilities increased 173 basis points, or a net change of 139 basis points. The more pronounced increase in the net interest margin compared to ~~3.02% from 2.57%~~the net change reflected the impact of higher rates on assets funded by equity. Balances at the Federal Reserve generally earn lower rates of interest than loans and securities. Average interest-earning deposits at the Federal Reserve Bank increased $141.5 million, or 28.3%, to $640.6 million in the first nine months of ~~2016, an increase of 45 basis points. The increase~~2023 from $499.1 million in the ~~net interest margin reflected higher yields on loans and investment securities, reflecting the aforementioned Federal Reserve increases.~~first nine months of 2022. In the first nine months of ~~2017,~~2023, the average yield on our loans increased to ~~4.46%~~7.48% from ~~4.15%~~4.37% for the first nine months of ~~2016,~~2022, an increase of 31311 basis points. Yields on taxable investment securities were higher at 2.83% compared to 2.37% an increase of 46 basis points. The net interest margin also benefited from the reinvestment of maturities of investment securities into higher yielding loans. Average interest earning deposits at the Federal Reserve Bank increased $42.2 million, or 8.6% to $532.2 million in the first nine months of ~~2017 from $490.0 million in the first nine months of 2016~~. That difference reflects a minimal percentage of total deposits, and resulted primarily from daily fluctuations in deposits and loans. The interest cost of total deposits and interest bearing liabilities was relatively stable at 0.38%2023 increased to 4.97% compared to 2.59% for the first nine months of ~~2017 compared to 0.32% in the first nine months~~2022, an increase of 2016. The cost of deposits increased significantly less than the increase in variable rates on loans and investments primarily due to contractual provisions related to prepaid card deposits. Those contracts result in only partial adjustment to Federal Reserve rate increases.238 basis points.

Average Daily ~~Balances.~~ Balances


	Nine months ended September 30,												Nine months ended September 30,
	2023						2022						2023 vs 2022
	Average				Average		Average				Average
	Balance		Interest⁽¹⁾		Rate		Balance		Interest⁽¹⁾		Rate		Due to Volume		Due to Rate		Total
	(Dollars in thousands)
Assets:
Interest-earning assets:
Loans, net of deferred loan fees and costs⁽²⁾	$	5,772,266	$	324,009		7.48%	$	5,531,902	$	181,174		4.37%	$	8,195	$	134,640	$	142,835
Leases-bank qualified⁽³⁾		3,920		279		9.49%		3,657		185		6.75%		14		80		94
Investment securities-taxable		773,485		28,820		4.97%		880,426		17,115		2.59%		(1,788)		13,493		11,705
Investment securities-nontaxable⁽³⁾		3,193		144		6.01%		3,559		93		3.48%		(8)		59		51
Interest-earning deposits at Federal Reserve Bank		640,554		24,271		5.05%		499,104		2,876		0.77%		1,035		20,360		21,395
Net interest-earning assets		7,193,418		377,523		7.00%		6,918,648		201,443		3.88%

Allowance for credit losses		(23,192)						(19,087)
Other assets		269,072						203,143
	$	7,439,298					$	7,102,704						7,448		168,632		176,080

Liabilities and shareholders' equity:
Deposits:
Demand and interest checking	$	6,343,711	$	106,984		2.25%	$	5,598,028	$	18,522		0.44%		2,786		85,676		88,462
Savings and money market		88,738		2,465		3.70%		522,525		4,192		1.07%		(12,050)		10,323		(1,727)
Time		27,802		858		4.11%		29,508		547		2.47%		(30)		341		311
Total deposits		6,460,251		110,307		2.28%		6,150,061		23,261		0.50%

Short-term borrowings		6,758		234		4.62%		71,589		1,267		2.36%		(2,245)		1,212		(1,033)
Repurchase agreements		41		—		—		41		—		—		—		—		—
Long-term borrowings		9,945		382		5.12%		39,286		506		1.72%		(1,127)		1,003		(124)
Subordinated debt		13,401		825		8.21%		13,401		432		4.30%		—		393		393
Senior debt		97,220		3,793		5.20%		98,817		3,838		5.18%		(62)		17		(45)
Total deposits and liabilities		6,587,616		115,541		2.34%		6,373,195		29,304		0.61%

Other liabilities		117,822						71,413
Total liabilities		6,705,438						6,444,608						(12,728)		98,965		86,237

Shareholders' equity		733,860						658,096
	$	7,439,298					$	7,102,704

Net interest income on tax equivalent basis⁽³⁾			$	261,982					$	172,139			$	20,176	$	69,667	$	89,843

Tax equivalent adjustment				89						58

Net interest income			$	261,893					$	172,081

Net interest margin⁽³⁾						4.86%						3.32%

⁽¹⁾Interest on loans for 2023 and 2022 includes $27,000 and $502,000, respectively, of interest and fees on PPP loans.
⁽²⁾Includes commercial loans, at fair value. All periods include non-accrual loans.
⁽³⁾Full taxable equivalent basis, using 21% respective statutory federal tax rates in 2023 and 2022.

Nine months ended September 30,

2017

2016

Average

Average

Average

Average

Balance

Interest

Rate

Balance

Interest

Rate

(dollars in thousands)
Assets:

Interest earning assets:

Loans net of unearned fees and costs **

$                 1,740,655

$             58,266

4.46%

$                 1,543,448

$             48,061

4.15%
Leases - bank qualified*

21,167

1,231

7.75%

20,618

1,334

8.63%
Investment securities-taxable

1,269,922

26,990

2.83%

1,280,692

22,782

2.37%
Investment securities-nontaxable*

14,423

351

3.24%

59,892

983

2.19%
Interest earning deposits at Federal Reserve Bank

532,223

3,961

0.99%

490,037

1,677

0.46%
Federal funds sold  and securities purchased under agreement to resell

60,119

931

2.06%

27,414

301

1.46%
Net interest earning assets

3,638,509

91,730

3.36%

3,422,101

75,138

2.93%

Allowance for loan and lease losses

(6,793)

(4,538)

Assets held for sale from discontinued operations

337,102

9,594

3.79%

528,168

15,037

3.80%
Other assets

251,629

283,171

$                 4,220,447

$                 4,228,902

Liabilities and shareholders' equity:

Deposits:

Demand and interest checking

$                 3,433,027

$               8,836

0.34%

$                 3,325,047

$               7,217

0.29%
Savings and money market

434,768

1,718

0.53%

390,202

1,028

0.35%
Time

-

-

0.00%

103,624

447

0.58%
Total deposits

3,867,795

10,554

0.36%

3,818,873

8,692

0.30%

Short-term borrowings

19,498

197

1.35%

58,056

263

0.60%
Repurchase agreements

245

-

0.00%

812

1

0.16%
Subordinated debt

13,401

432

4.30%

13,401

383

3.81%
Total deposits and interest bearing liabilities

3,900,939

11,183

0.38%

3,891,142

9,339

0.32%

Other liabilities

431

21,306

Total liabilities

3,901,370

3,912,448

Shareholders' equity

319,077

316,454

$                 4,220,447

$                 4,228,902

Net interest income on tax equivalent basis *

$             90,141

$             80,836

Tax equivalent adjustment

554

811

Net interest income

$             89,587

$             80,025

Net interest margin *

3.02%

2.57%

* Full taxable equivalent basis, using a 35% statutory tax rate.

** Includes loans held for sale.

For the first nine months of ~~2017,~~2023, average ~~interest earning~~interest-earning assets increased to ~~$3.64~~$7.19 billion, an increase of ~~$216.4~~$274.8 million, or ~~6.3%~~4.0%, from ~~$3.42~~$6.92 billion in the first nine months of ~~2016.~~2022. The increase reflected increased average balances of loans and leases of ~~$197.8~~$240.6 million, or ~~12.6%~~4.3%, ~~and increased~~partially offset by decreased average ~~balances~~investment securities of ~~interest earning deposits at the Federal Reserve Bank of $42.2~~$107.3 million, or ~~8.6%~~12.1%. ~~Average securities decreased $56.2 million or 4.2% as lower yielding securities were replaced with higher yielding loans. Average~~For those respective periods, average demand and interest checking deposits increased ~~$108.0~~$745.7 million, or ~~3.2% due~~13.3%. A $433.8 million decrease in average savings and money market balances reflected the sweeping of deposits off our balance sheet to other institutions. Such sweeps are utilized to optimize

diversity within our funding structure by managing the percentage of individual client deposits to total deposits. The interest expense shown for demand and interest checking is primarily comprised of interest paid to ~~growth in payments related deposits.~~our affinity groups.

Provision for ~~Loan and Lease~~Credit Losses.

Our provision for credit losses was $4.0 million for the first nine months of 2023 compared to $4.3 million for the first nine months of 2022.

The ACL was $24.1 million, or 0.46% of total loans, at September 30, 2023, compared to $22.4 million, or 0.41% of total loans, at December 31, 2022. The higher ratio at September 30, 2023 reflected an increase in the ACL resulting from the impact of higher net charge-offs while total loans outstanding decreased. We believe that our ACL is adequate to cover expected losses. For more information about our provision and ACL and our loss experience, see “Financial Condition – Allowance for Credit Losses,” “– Net Charge-offs,” and “– Non-performing Loans, Loans 90 days Delinquent and Still Accruing, OREO, Modified Loans and Troubled Debt Restructurings,” below and “Note 6. Loans” to the unaudited consolidated financial statements herein.

Non-Interest Income

Non-interest income was $85.1 million in the first nine months of 2023 compared to $79.9 million in the first nine months of 2022. The $5.2 million, or 6.5%, increase between those respective periods reflected a decrease in net realized and unrealized gains on commercial loans, at fair value to $4.2 million from $11.3 million. The $7.1 million change reflected a decrease in income recognized when such loans are repaid, as a result of fewer repayments as that portfolio continues to run off. The $4.2 million was comprised of $5.9 million of non-SBA commercial real estate loan repayment related income, $1.7 million of fair value losses and ~~lease losses~~$18,000 of hedge fair value adjustments.

Prepaid, debit card and related fees increased ~~$340,000,~~$9.1 million, or 15.8%, to $67.0 million for the first nine months of 2023 compared to $57.9 million in the first nine months of 2022. The first nine months of 2023 included approximately $600,000 of non-interest income related to the fourth quarter of 2022, and a $1.4 million termination fee from a client which formed its own bank. The increase also reflected higher transaction volume from new clients and organic growth from existing clients. ACH, card and other payment processing fees increased $601,000, or 9.2%, to $7.2 million for the first nine months of 2023 compared to $6.6 million in the first nine months of 2022, reflecting an increase in rapid funds transfer volume.

Leasing related income increased $1.2 million, or 33.7%, to $4.8 million for the first nine months of 2023 from $3.6 million for the first nine months of 2022. The increase reflected higher volumes of vehicle sales.

Other non-interest income increased $1.3 million, or 186.5%, to $2.0 million for the first nine months of 2023 from $698,000 in the first nine months of 2022 primarily reflecting increased prepayment fees on advisor financing loans and prepayment and loan sales fees on small business loans.

Non-Interest Expense

Total non-interest expense was $145.4 million for the first nine months of 2023, an increase of $19.4 million, or 15.4%, compared to $126.0 million for the first nine months of 2022. The majority of the increase resulted from higher salaries and employee benefits expense, which reflected higher numbers of staff in financial crimes, compliance and IT due to increases in deposit transaction volume and the development of new products. The increase also reflected higher incentive and stock compensation expense and less expense deferral related to loan origination costs as a result of lower loan production.

The following table presents the principal categories of non-interest expense for the periods indicated:


	For the nine months ended September 30,
	2023		2022		Increase (Decrease)		Percent Change
	(Dollars in thousands)
Salaries and employee benefits	$	93,427	$	77,848	$	15,579		20.0%
Depreciation and amortization		2,046		2,224		(178)		(8.0)%
Rent and related occupancy cost		4,265		3,831		434		11.3%
Data processing expense		4,123		3,727		396		10.6%
Printing and supplies		355		342		13		3.8%
Audit expense		1,255		1,107		148		13.4%
Legal expense		3,110		3,175		(65)		(2.0)%
Legal settlement		—		1,152		(1,152)		(100.0)%
Civil money penalty		—		1,750		(1,750)		(100.0)%
Amortization of intangible assets		298		298		—		—
FDIC insurance		2,233		2,326		(93)		(4.0)%
Software		12,981		12,030		951		7.9%
Insurance		3,935		3,692		243		6.6%
Telecom and IT network communications		1,044		1,119		(75)		(6.7)%
Consulting		1,412		902		510		56.5%
Writedowns and other losses on OREO		1,315		—		1,315		100.0%
Other		13,633		10,504		3,129		29.8%
Total non-interest expense	$	145,432	$	126,027	$	19,405		15.4%

Changes in categories of non-interest expense were as follows:

Salaries and employee benefits expense increased to $93.4 million for the first nine months of 2023, an increase of $15.6 million, or 20.0%, from $77.8 million for the first nine months of 2022.

Depreciation and amortization expense decreased $178,000, or 8.0%, to $2.0 million in the first nine months of 2023 from $2.2 million in the first nine months of 2022.

Rent and related occupancy cost increased $434,000, or 11.3%, to $4.3 million in the first nine months of 2023 from $3.8 million in the first nine months of 2022, reflecting increased IT-related equipment expense.

Data processing expense increased $396,000, or 10.6%, to $4.1 million in the first nine months of 2023 from $3.7 million in the first nine months of 2022, reflecting higher transaction volume.

Printing and supplies expense increased $13,000, or 3.8%, to $355,000 in the first nine months of 2023 from $342,000 in the first nine months of 2022.

Audit expense increased $148,000, or 13.4%, to $1.3 million in the first nine months of 2023 from $1.1 million in the first nine months of 2022.

Legal expense decreased $65,000, or 2.0%, to $3.1 million in the first nine months of 2023 from $3.2 million in the first nine months of 2022 reflecting decreased legal costs related to the SEC matters discussed in “Note O — Commitments and Contingencies” to the consolidated financial statements in the Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2022.

FDIC insurance expense decreased $93,000, or 4.0%, to $2.2 million for the first nine months of ~~2017 compared to $1.8 million for the first nine months of 2016. The increase in the provision is based on our evaluation of~~

the adequacy of our allowance for loan and leases losses, particularly in light of current economic conditions. At September 30, 2017, our allowance for loan and lease losses amounted to $7.3 million, or 0.53% of total loans compared to $6.3 million, or 0.52% of total loans at December 31, 2016. For more information about our provision and allowance for loan and lease losses and our loss experience, see “Financial Condition-Allowance for loan and lease losses”, “-Net charge-offs,” and “-Non-performing loans, loans 90 days delinquent and still accruing, and troubled debt restructurings,” below and Note 6 to the financial statements.

~~Non-Interest Income. Non-interest income was $69.8~~2023 from $2.3 million in the first nine months of ~~2017 compared~~2022, primarily as a result of a lower assessment rate. The cost of resolving several recent bank failures may result in future increased premiums, or special assessments, which would serve to ~~$45.0~~increase expense in the period assessed.

Software expense increased $951,000 or 7.9%, to $13.0 million in the first nine months of ~~2016, before gains on securities of $1.6~~2023 from $12.0 million in the first nine months of ~~2017 and $3.1~~2022. The increase reflected higher expenditures for information technology infrastructure including those to service the payments businesses.

Insurance expense increased $243,000 or 6.6%, to $3.9 million in the first nine months of 2016. The $24.8 million, or 55.1%, increase between those respective periods reflected a $12.3 million change in value of investment in unconsolidated entity. It also reflected a $16.7 million increase in gain on sale of loans into securitizations resulting primarily from two securitizations in 2017. In the second quarter of 2017 we had a $2.5 million gain on the sale of a portion of our health savings portfolio which was more than offset by a $3.4 million loss on the sale of our European prepaid card operations. Gain on sale of loans increased2023 compared to $17.5 million for the first nine months of 2017 from $809,000 in the first nine months of 2016 primarily as a result of gain on sale of loans into two securitizations. Service fees on deposit accounts increased $1.6 million, or 46.8%, to $4.9 million for the first nine months of 2017 from $3.3 million for the first nine months of 2016 reflecting increases in service charges on safe harbor individual retirement accounts. Prepaid card fees decreased $61,000, or 0.2% to $39.3 million for the first nine months of 2017 from $39.3 million for the first nine months of 2016 which reflected decreased volumes from a client as a result of its change in ownership and several programs whose sponsors decided to exit prepaid cards. Those volume decreases were largely offset with organic growth in other programs. Leasing income increased $632,000 or 43.4% to $2.1 million for the first nine months of 2017 from $1.5 million for the first nine months of 2016, which reflected higher gains on disposition of leased vehicles in 2017. Affinity fees decreased $2.1 million, or 58.8%, to $1.4 million for the first nine months of 2017 from $3.5 million for the first nine months of 2016. The decrease resulted primarily from the planned exit of one affinity relationship which had a change of ownership. Other non-interest income decreased $3.8 million, or 81.0% to $892,000 for the first nine months of 2017 from $4.7$3.7 million in the first nine months of ~~2016. The decrease resulted primarily from a gain~~2022, reflecting higher rates, especially on ~~the sale of Visa Europe to Visa U.S.A., in which members of Visa Europe shared in the sales proceeds, which occurred in the second quarter of 2016.~~cyber insurance.

~~Non-Interest Expense. Total non-interest~~Telecom and IT network communications expense ~~was $119.0 million for the first nine months of 2017, a decrease of $37.4 million,~~decreased $75,000, or 23.9% from $156.4 million for the first nine months of 2016. The decrease reflected a decrease of $29.1 million in Bank Secrecy Act lookback expense which concluded in the third quarter of 2016. Salaries and employee benefits expense also decreased to $57.9 million, a decrease of $4.5 million, or 7.2% from $62.4 million for the first nine months of 2016. The decrease in salaries and employee benefits reflected bankwide staff reductions in the third quarter of 2016 which reduced total staff by approximately 20%. Depreciation and amortization decreased $346,000, or 9.2%6.7%, to ~~$3.4~~$1.0 million in the first nine months of ~~2017~~2023 from $3.8 million in the first nine months of 2016 which reflected reduced spending on fixed assets and equipment. Rent and occupancy decreased $570,000 or 11.9% to $4.2 million in the first nine months of 2017 from $4.8 million in the first nine months of 2016. ~~The decrease reflected a reduction in leased space and more efficient use of office space.~~ Data processing expense decreased $2.9 million, or 26.5%, to $8.0 million in the first nine months of 2017 from $10.9 million in the first nine months of 2016. The decrease reflected the impact of a renegotiated data processing contract and lower account and transaction volume as a result of the planned exit of an affinity program which had an ownership change. It also reflected the impact of the consolidation of our call centers as an efficiency and cost cutting measure. Printing and supplies decreased $1.1 million or 49.0% to $1.1 million in the first nine months of ~~2017 from $2.2 million in the first nine months of 2016, which reflected elevated expense in 2016 due to service charge and other communications in that year. Audit~~2022.

Consulting expense increased ~~$524,000~~$510,000, or 70.2% to $1.3 million in the first nine months of 2017 from $746,000 in the first nine months of 2016 which reflected increased regulatory compliance audit fees. Legal expense increased $2.1 million, or 56.1%56.5%, to $5.9 million for the first nine months of 2017 from $3.8 million in the first nine months of 2016 which reflected costs associated with an SEC subpoena related to the restatement of the financial statements (see “Financial Statements; Regulatory Actions”) and other regulatory related legal fees. The year to date increase was net of insurance coverage. Amortization of intangible assets increased $101,000, or 9.8%, to $1.1 million for the first nine months of 2017 from $1.0 million for the first nine months of 2016. The increase resulted primarily from the amortization of the intangible asset resulting from the 2016 purchase of the $60 million of lease receivables. FDIC insurance expense increased $468,000, or 6.6% to $7.6 million for the first nine months of 2017 from $7.1 million in the first nine months of 2016, which reflected the impact of an increase in the FDIC assessment rate. Software expense increased $1.1 million, or 12.8% to $9.3 million in the first nine months of 2017 from $8.3 million in the first nine months of 2016 which reflected additional information technology infrastructure to improve efficiency and scalability, including BSA software required to satisfy regulatory requirements. Insurance expense increased $158,000, or 9.3%, to $1.9 million in the first nine months of 2017 from $1.7 million in the first nine months of 2016. The increase reflected higher cyber and director and officer coverages. Telecom and IT network communications expense decreased $104,000 or 6.7% to $1.4 million in the first nine months of ~~2017~~2023 from ~~$1.5~~$902,000 in the first nine months of 2022. The increase reflected expenses related to the Company’s ongoing efforts of documenting and optimizing operational controls including external risk assessments.

The $1.3 million of writedowns and other losses on OREO resulted primarily from a pending sale of a movie theater property as described in “Note E — Loans” to the December 31, 2022 consolidated financial statements in the Form 10-K. The property had previously been recorded at appraised value, which was adjusted to the proposed sales price in the first nine months of 2023. The sale closed in October 2023 and a loss of $95,000 was additionally realized.

Other non-interest expense increased $3.1 million, or 29.8%, to $13.6 million in the first nine months of 2016. The decrease reflected cost cutting efforts which included the elimination of corporate sponsored cell phones. Securitization and servicing expense decreased $647,000 or 86.6%, to $100,000 in the first nine months of 20172023 from $747,000 in the first nine months of 2016. Expense in 2016 reflected expenditures related to a potential securitization for loans which were instead sold directly to a single buyer. Consulting expense decreased $2.5 million, or 58.6% to $1.7$10.5 million in the first nine months of ~~2017 from $4.2~~2022. The $3.1 million increase primarily reflected the following increases: a. regulatory examination assessment fees of $871,000, b. OREO expense of $740,000 reflecting additional OREO properties and c. an increase of $306,000 in travel expenses, as travel increased post-pandemic.

Income Taxes

Income tax expense was $49.3 million for the first nine months of 2023 compared to $31.7 million in the first nine months of ~~2016.~~2022. The ~~decrease reflected reduced regulatory related~~increase resulted primarily from an increase in income, substantially all of which is subject to income tax. A 24.9% effective tax rate in 2023 and ~~investor relations consulting. Other non-interest expense decreased $3.8 million, or 27.0% to $10.3 million~~a 26.0% effective tax rate in the first nine months of 2017 from $14.1 million in the first nine months of 2016. The $3.8 million decrease reflected decreases of $1.8 million in travel and entertainment expenses, $815,000 in customer identification expense, $512,000 in

~~postage expense, $299,000 in expense related to third party origination of SBA loans and $190,000 in other leasing expense. The decrease in customer identification expense~~2022 primarily reflected the exit of one affinity group and reduced health savings volume due to the sale of that business. The decrease in postage expense reflected the impact of the sale of the health savings business and also reflected elevated expense in 2016 due to service charge and other communications mailings in that year. The decrease in travel and entertainment expense reflected the impact of staff reductions and a ~~concerted effort to reduce travel and related expenses.~~

~~Income Taxes.~~ ~~Income~~21% federal tax benefit for continuing operations was $457,000 for the first nine months of 2017 compared to $15.3 million in the first nine months of 2016. The tax benefit in 2017 reflected the impact of approximately $12 million of deferred tax valuation allowance reversals. That tax benefit was largely offset by the application of statutory federal and state tax rates against $30.2 million of pre tax income. The 35% effective tax benefit rate in 2016 reflected the statutory 34% rate and the impact of various state income taxes.

Liquidity ~~and Capital Resources~~

Liquidity defines our ability to generate funds at a reasonable cost to support asset growth, meet deposit withdrawals, satisfy borrowing needs and otherwise operate on an ongoing basis. Maintaining an adequate level of liquidity depends on the institution’s ability to efficiently meet both expected and unexpected cash flows without adversely affecting daily operations or financial condition. The Company’s liquidity management policy requirements include sustaining defined liquidity minimums, concentration monitoring and management, stress testing, contingency planning and related oversight. Based on our sources of funding and liquidity discussed below, we believe we have sufficient liquidity and capital resources available for our needs in the next 12 months and for the foreseeable future.We invest the funds we do not need for daily operations primarily in overnight federal funds or in our interest-bearing account at the Federal Reserve.

Our primary source of funding has been deposits. ~~We have been exiting deposit relationships~~Average total deposits increased by $174.3 million, or 2.9%, to ~~reduce excess balances at~~$6.29 billion for the third quarter of 2023 compared to the third quarter of 2022. Federal Reserve ~~which earn relatively low rates of interest. While such exits continued~~average balances increased to $639.9 million in the third quarter 2023 from $267.4 million in the third quarter of ~~2017, they were offset~~2022. Overnight borrowings are also periodically utilized as a funding source to facilitate cash management, but average balances have generally not been significant.

One source of contingent liquidity is available-for-sale securities, which amounted to $756.6 million at September 30, 2023, compared to $766.0 million at December 31, 2022. The majority of these securities can be pledged to facilitate extensions of credit in addition to loans already pledged against lines of credit, as discussed later in this section. Loan repayments, another source of funds, have historically been exceeded by ~~growth in prepaid card and other payments deposits. Accordingly, overnight balances at the Federal Reserve Bank averaged $366.7 million for~~disbursements associated with new loan originations, a use of funds. However, loan repayments during the third quarter of ~~2017, which was~~2023 exceeded originations, and the excess of repayments over originations provided additional liquidity. As a result of such higher ~~than~~loan repayments, at September 30, 2023, outstanding loans amounted to $5.20 billion, compared to $5.49 billion at the prior year end, a decrease of $287.9 million. Commercial loans, at fair value, decreased to $379.6 million from $589.1 million between those respective dates, a decrease of $209.5 million, which also provided funding. In 2019 and previous years, these loans were generally originated for securitization and sale, but in 2020 we decided to retain such loans on the balance sheet. While we suspended originating such loans after the first quarter of 2020, we resumed originations, which consist primarily of non-SBA commercial real estate bridge loans, in the third quarter ~~average~~ of ~~$324.2 million. Investment securities available-for-sale also provide a significant source~~2021. Such originations are held for investment and are included in “Loans, net of ~~liquidity. Loan repayments, also a source~~deferred loan fees and costs” on the balance sheet. Accordingly, commercial loans, at fair value will continue to run off. Our liquidity planning has not previously placed undue reliance on securitizations, and while our future planning excludes the impact of ~~funds, were exceeded by new loan disbursements during the first nine months of 2017.~~ securitizations, other liquidity sources, primarily deposits, are determined to be adequate.

While we do not have a traditional branch system, we believe that our core deposits, which include our demand, interest checking, savings and money market accounts, have similar characteristics to those of a bank with a branch system. The majority of our deposit accounts are obtained with the assistance of third-parties and as a result have historically been classified as brokered by the FDIC. Prior to December 2020, FDIC guidance for classification of deposit accounts as brokered was relatively broad, and generally included accounts which were referred to or “placed” with the institution by other companies. If the Bank ceases to be categorized as “well capitalized” under banking regulations, it will be prohibited from accepting, renewing or rolling over any of its deposits classified as brokered without the consent of the FDIC. In such a case, the FDIC’s refusal to grant consent to our accepting, renewing or rolling over brokered deposits could effectively restrict or eliminate the ability of the Bank to operate its business lines as presently conducted. In December 2020, the FDIC issued a new regulation which, in the third quarter of 2021, resulted in the majority of our deposits being reclassified from brokered to non-brokered. As of September 30, 2023, an estimated $576.5 million of our total deposit accounts of $6.50 billion were not insured by FDIC insurance, which requires identification of the depositor and is limited to $250,000 per identified depositor. Uninsured accounts may represent a greater liquidity risk than FDIC-insured accounts should large depositors withdraw funds as a result of negative financial developments either at the Bank or in the economy. Significant amounts of our uninsured deposits are

comprised of small balances, such as anonymous gift cards and corporate incentive cards for which there is no identified depositor. We do not believe that ~~the rate on~~such uninsured accounts present a significant liquidity risk.

Certain components of our deposits is at or below competitors’ rates. However, the focus of our business model is to identify affinity groups that control significant deposits as part of their business. A key component to the model is that the affinity group deposits are both stable and “sticky,” in the sense that they do not react to fluctuations in the market. Nonetheless, certain components of the deposits do experience seasonality, creating greater excess liquidity at certain ~~times during the year, especially~~times. The largest deposit inflows occur in the first quarter ~~as a result~~ of the year when certain of our accounts are credited with tax refund payments from the U.S. Treasury.

While consumer deposit accounts, including prepaid and debit card ~~balances.~~

Historically, we have also used sources outside of our deposit products to fund our loan growth, including Federal Home Loan Bank advances, repurchase agreements, and institutional (brokered) certificates of deposit. In the first nine months of 2017,accounts,comprise the vast majority of our funding was derived from prepaid cards and transaction accounts. While the FDIC now classifies prepaid and most of our other deposits obtained with the cooperation of third parties as brokered, these deposits have demonstrated stability and low cost for an extended historical period. Weneeds, we maintain secured borrowing lines with the ~~Federal Home Loan Bank of Pittsburgh, or~~ FHLB and the Federal ~~Reserve Bank. As of September 30, 2017, we had approximately $573.7 million available on a line of credit with the Federal Home Loan Bank and $179.8 million available on a~~Reserve. Our collateralized line of credit with the Federal Reserve ~~Bank. These lines may be~~Bank had available accessible capacity of $1.94 billion as of September 30, 2023 and was collateralized by ~~specified types~~loans. We have also pledged in excess of $1.10 billion of multi-family loans ~~or securities, and~~to the FHLB. As a result, we have approximately $731.5 million of availability on that line of credit which we can also access at any time. As of September 30, 2023, there were no amounts outstanding on either of these lines of credit. We expect to continue to maintain ~~these facilities.~~our facilities with the FHLB and Federal Reserve.

Another source of contingent liquidity is available-for-sale securities, which amounted to $756.6 million at September 30, 2023, compared to $766.0 million at December 31, 2022. Approximately $350 million of our available-for-sale securities are U.S. government agency securities which are highly liquid and may be immediately pledged as additional collateral. We actively monitor our positions and contingent funding sources ~~on a daily basis. As of September 30, 2017, we did not have any borrowings outstanding on our lines of credit.~~daily.

As a holding company conducting substantially all of our business through our subsidiaries, ~~our~~the Company’s near-term need for liquidity consists principally of cash ~~needed to make~~for required interest payments on our ~~trust preferred securities.~~subordinated debentures, consisting of $13.4 million of debentures bearing interest at SOFR plus 3.51% and maturing in March 2038 (the “2038 Debentures”), and senior debt, consisting of $100.0 million senior notes with an interest rate of 4.75% and maturing in August 2025 (the “2025 Senior Notes”). Semi-annual interest payments on the 2025 Senior Notes are approximately $2.4 million, and quarterly interest payments on the 2038 Debentures are approximately $300,000. As of September 30, ~~2017,~~2023, we had cash reserves of approximately ~~$13.0~~$9.6 million at the holding company. ~~Current quarterly~~During the third quarter of 2023, $25.0 million of common stock repurchases were funded by a dividend from the Bank, as are interest payments on the ~~$13.4 million~~above debt instruments. Stock repurchases may be terminated at any time. The holding company’s sources of ~~trust preferred securities~~liquidity are ~~approximately $150,000 based on a floating rate~~primarily comprised of ~~3.25% over LIBOR. We expect that when the conditions under which the amendment to the 2014 Consent Order was issued will have been remediated, the FDIC will permit~~dividends paid by the Bank to ~~resume paying dividends to us to fund holding company operations. There can, however, be no assurance that~~ the ~~FDIC will, in fact, allow~~Company, and the ~~resumption~~issuance of Bank dividends to us at the end of that period or at all and, accordingly, there is risk that we will need to obtain alternate sources of funding. There can be no assurance that such sources would be available to us on acceptable terms or at all.debt.

Included in our cash and cash-equivalents at September 30, ~~2017~~2023 were ~~$328.0~~$898.5 million of ~~interest earning~~interest-earning deposits which primarily consisted of deposits with the Federal ~~Reserve and included deposits for reserve requirements.~~ Reserve.

Funding was directed primarily at cash outflows required for net loan growth of $152.5 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2017, and $120.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2016. Net redemptions of investment securities for the nine months ended September 30, 2017, were $87.2 million compared to netIn 2023, purchases of ~~$251.1~~$49.0 million ~~for the prior year.~~of securities were exceeded by $55.2 million of redemptions. We had outstanding commitments to fund loans, including unused lines of credit, of ~~$1.31~~$1.80 billion and ~~$1.09~~$1.98 billion as of September 30, ~~2017~~2023 and December 31, ~~2016,~~2022, respectively. The majority of our commitments are variable rate and originate with ~~security backed lines~~SBLOC. The recorded amount of ~~credit. Such~~such commitments ~~are normally~~has, for many accounts, been based on the full amount of collateral in a ~~customers~~customer’s investment account. ~~However, such commitments have historically been drawn at only a fraction of the total commitment.~~ The funding requirements for such commitments occur on a measured basis over time and would be funded by normal deposit growth. Additionally, these loans are “demand” loans and as such, represent a contingent source of funding.

48Capital Resources and Requirements

We must comply with capital adequacy guidelines issued by ~~the FDIC.~~our regulators. A bank must, in general, have a Tier 1 leverage ratio of 5.00%, a ratio of Tier I capital to risk-weighted assets of 8.0%, a ratio of total capital to risk-weighted assets of 10.0% and a ratio of common equity tier 1 to risk weighted assets of 6.5% to be considered “well capitalized.” The Tier I leverage ratio is the ratio of Tier 1 capital to average assets for the ~~period.~~quarter. “Tier I capital” includes common shareholders’ equity, certain qualifying perpetual preferred stock and minority interests in equity accounts of consolidated subsidiaries, less intangibles. At September 30, ~~2017, we~~2023, both the Company and the Bank were “well capitalized” under banking regulations.

The following table sets forth our regulatory capital amounts and ratios for the periods indicated:

Tier 1 capital

Tier 1 capital

Total capital

Common equity

to average

to risk-weighted

to risk-weighted

tier 1 to risk

assets ratio

assets ratio

assets ratio

weighted assets

As of September 30, 2017

The Bancorp, Inc.

8.24%

16.27%

16.62%

16.27%
The Bancorp Bank

8.05%

15.95%

16.31%

15.95%
"Well capitalized" institution (under FDIC regulations-Basel III)

5.00%

8.00%

10.00%

6.50%

As of December 31, 2016

The Bancorp, Inc.

6.90%

13.34%

13.63%

13.34%
The Bancorp Bank

6.84%

13.24%

13.53%

13.24%
"Well capitalized" institution (under FDIC regulations)

5.00%

8.00%

10.00%

6.50%



	Tier 1 capital	Tier 1 capital	Total capital	Common equity
	to average	to risk-weighted	to risk-weighted	tier 1 to risk
	assets ratio	assets ratio	assets ratio	weighted assets

As of September 30, 2023
The Bancorp, Inc.	10.92%	15.53%	16.04%	15.53%
The Bancorp Bank, National Association	12.13%	17.26%	17.77%	17.26%
"Well capitalized" institution (under federal regulations-Basel III)	5.00%	8.00%	10.00%	6.50%

As of December 31, 2022
The Bancorp, Inc.	9.63%	13.40%	13.87%	13.40%
The Bancorp Bank, National Association	10.73%	14.95%	15.42%	14.95%
"Well capitalized" institution (under federal regulations-Basel III)	5.00%	8.00%	10.00%	6.50%

Asset and Liability Management

The management of rate sensitive assets and liabilities is essential to controlling interest rate risk and optimizing interest margins. An interest rate sensitive asset or liability is one that, within a defined time period, either matures or experiences an interest rate change in line with general market rates. Interest rate sensitivity measures the relative volatility of an institution’s interest margin resulting from changes in market interest rates. While it is difficult to predict the impact of inflation and responsive Federal Reserve rate changes on our net interest income, the Federal Reserve has historically utilized increases in the overnight federal funds rate as one tool in fighting inflation. As a result of high rates of inflation, the Federal Reserve raised rates in each quarter of 2022 and in the first three quarters of 2023. Our largest funding source, prepaid and debit card deposit accounts, contractually adjusts to only a portion of increases or decreases in rates which are largely determined by such Federal Reserve actions. That pricing has generally supported the maintenance of a balance sheet for which net interest income tends to increase with increases in rates. While deposits reprice to only a portion of Federal Reserve rate changes, such changes are immediate. Interest-earning assets, comprised primarily of loans and securities, tend to adjust more fully to rate increases at lagged contractual pricing intervals. The majority of our loans and securities are variable rate and generally reprice monthly or quarterly, although some reprice over several years. Additionally, the impact of loan interest rate floors which must be exceeded before rates on certain loans increase, may result in decreases in net interest income with lesser increases in rates. Cumulative 2022 Federal Reserve interest rate increases resulted in contractual rates on loans generally exceeding rate floors beginning in the second quarter of 2022.

We have adopted policies designed to manage net interest income and preserve capital over a broad range of interest rate movements. To effectively administer the policies and to monitor our exposure to fluctuations in interest rates, we maintain an asset/liability committee, consisting of the Bank’s Chief Executive Officer, Chief Accounting Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Chief Credit Officer and others. This committee meets quarterly to review our financial results, develop strategies to optimize margins and to respond to market conditions. The primary goal of our policies is to optimize margins and manage interest rate risk, subject to overall policy constraints for prudent management of interest rate risk.

We monitor, manage and control interest rate risk through a variety of techniques, including the use of traditional interest rate sensitivity analysis (also known as “gap analysis”) and an interest rate risk management model. With the interest rate risk management model, we project future net interest income and then estimate the effect of various changes in interest rates ~~and balance sheet growth rates~~ on that projected net interest income. We also use the interest rate risk management model to calculate the change in net portfolio value over a range of interest rate change scenarios. Traditional gap analysis involves arranging our ~~interest earning~~interest-earning assets and interest bearing liabilities by repricing periods and then computing the difference (or “interest rate sensitivity gap”) between the assets and liabilities that we estimate will reprice during each time period and cumulatively through the end of each time period.

Both interest rate sensitivity modeling and gap analysis are done at a specific point in time and involve a variety of significant estimates and assumptions. Interest rate sensitivity modeling requires, among other things, estimates of how much and when yields and costs on individual categories of ~~interest earning~~interest-earning assets and interest bearing liabilities will respond to general changes in market rates, future cash flows and discount rates. Gap analysis requires estimates as to when individual categories of interest-sensitive assets and liabilities will reprice, and assumes that assets and liabilities assigned to the same repricing period will reprice at the same time and in the same amount. Gap analysis does not account for the fact that repricing of assets and liabilities is discretionary and subject to competitive and other pressures. A gap is considered positive when the amount of interest rate sensitive assets exceeds the amount of interest rate sensitive liabilities. A gap is considered negative when the amount of interest rate sensitive liabilities exceeds interest rate sensitive assets. During a period of falling interest rates, a positive gap would tend to adversely affect net interest income, while a negative gap would tend to result in an increase in net interest income. During a period of rising interest rates, a positive gap would tend to result in an increase in net interest income while a negative gap would tend to affect net interest income adversely.

The following table sets forth the estimated maturity or repricing structure of our ~~interest earning~~interest-earning assets and interest bearing liabilities at September 30, ~~2017.~~2023. Except as stated below, the amounts of assets or liabilities shown which reprice or mature during a particular period were determined in accordance with the contractual terms of each asset or liability. The majority of transaction and savings balances are assumed to be “core” deposits, or deposits that will generally remain with us regardless of market interest rates. We estimate the repricing characteristics of these deposits based on historical performance, past experience, ~~at other institutions~~judgmental predictions and other deposit behavior assumptions. However, we may choose not to reprice liabilities proportionally to changes in market interest rates for competitive or other reasons. Additionally, although non-interest bearing transaction accounts are not paid interest, we estimate certain of the balances will reprice as a result of the contractual fees that are paid to the affinity groups which are based upon a rate index, and therefore are included in interest expense. We have adjusted the transaction account balances in the table downward, to better reflect the impact of their partial adjustment to changes in rates. Loans and security balances, which adjust more fully to market rate changes, are based upon actual balances. The table does not assume any prepayment of fixed-rate loans and mortgage-backed securities ~~which~~ are scheduled based on their anticipated cash flow, including prepayments based on historical data and current market trends. The table does not necessarily indicate the impact of general interest rate movements on our net interest income because the repricing and related behavior of certain categories of assets and liabilities ~~is beyond our control as, for~~(for example, prepayments of loans and withdrawal

of ~~deposits.~~deposits) is beyond our control. As a result, certain assets and liabilities indicated as repricing within a stated period may in fact reprice at different times and at different

rate levels. For instance, the majority of REBL loans are variable rate with floors, but prepayments may offset the benefit of such floors in decreasing rate environments.



	1-90		91-364		1-3		3-5		Over 5
	Days		Days		Years		Years		Years
	(Dollars in thousands)
Interest earning assets:
Commercial loans, at fair value	$	213,299	$	13,539	$	16,526	$	136,239	$	—
Loans, net of deferred loan fees and costs		3,839,366		116,858		362,993		674,938		204,817
Investment securities		402,081		42,335		134,015		80,137		98,068
Interest earning deposits		898,533		—		—		—		—
Total interest earning assets		5,353,279		172,732		513,534		891,314		302,885

Interest bearing liabilities:
Transaction accounts as adjusted⁽¹⁾		3,227,522		—		—		—		—
Savings and money market		49,428		—		—		—		—
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase		42		—		—		—		—
Senior debt and subordinated debentures		13,401		—		95,771		—		—
Total interest bearing liabilities		3,290,393		—		95,771		—		—
Gap	$	2,062,886	$	172,732	$	417,763	$	891,314	$	302,885
Cumulative gap	$	2,062,886	$	2,235,618	$	2,653,381	$	3,544,695	$	3,847,580
Gap to assets ratio		28%		2%		6%		12%		4%
Cumulative gap to assets ratio		28%		30%		36%		48%		52%

1-90

91-364

1-3

3-5

Over 5

Days

Days

Years

Years

Years

(dollars in thousands)
Interest earning assets:

Commercial loans held for sale

$                   169,953

$                   19,356

$                   50,267

$                21,181

$              119,515
Loans net of deferred loan costs

905,299

124,564

150,922

183,104

10,171
Investment securities

357,407

153,315

181,936

199,881

390,819
Interest earning deposits

328,023

-

-

-

-
Securities purchased under agreements to resell

65,095

-

-

-

-
Total interest earning assets

1,825,777

297,235

383,125

404,166

520,505

Interest bearing liabilities:

Demand and interest checking

2,012,233

66,386

66,386

-

-
Savings and money market

113,046

226,091

113,046

-

-
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase

180

-

-

-

-
Subordinated debenture

13,401

-

-

-

-
Total interest bearing liabilities

2,138,860

292,477

179,432

-

-
Gap

$                 (313,083)

$                     4,758

$                 203,693

$              404,166

$              520,505
Cumulative gap

$                 (313,083)

$               (308,325)

$               (104,632)

$              299,534

$              820,039
Gap to assets ratio

-8%

*

5%

10%

13%
Cumulative gap to assets ratio

-8%

-8%

-3%

8%

21%

*⁽¹⁾Transaction accounts are comprised primarily of demand deposits. While demand deposits are non-interest bearing, related fees paid to affinity groups may reprice according to specified indices.

The methods used to analyze interest rate sensitivity in this table have a number of limitations. Certain assets and liabilities may react differently to changes in interest rates even though they reprice or mature in the same or similar time periods. The interest rates on certain assets and liabilities may change at different times than ~~changes in~~ market interest rates, with some changing in advance of changes in market rates and some lagging behind changes in market rates. Additionally, the actual prepayments and withdrawals we experience when interest rates change may deviate significantly from those assumed in calculating the data shown in the table. Accordingly, actual results can and often do differ from projections.

We believe that the assumptions utilized in evaluating our estimated net interest income are reasonable; however, the interest rate sensitivity of our assets, liabilities and off-balance sheet financial instruments, as well as the estimated effect of changes in interest rates on estimated net interest income, could vary substantially if different assumptions are used or actual experience differs from presumed behavior of various deposit and loan categories. The following table shows the effects of interest rate shocks on our net portfolio value described as Market Value of Portfolio Equity (“MVPE”) and net interest income. Rate shocks assume that current interest rates change immediately and sustain parallel shifts. For interest rate increases or decreases of 100 and 200 basis points, our policy includes a guideline that our MVPE ratio should not decrease more than 10% and 15%, respectively, and that net interest income should not decrease more than 10% and 15%, respectively. As illustrated in the following table, we complied with our asset/liability policy guidelines at September 30, 2023. While our modeling suggests that rate increases of 100 and 200 basis points will have a positive impact on net interest income (as shown in the table below), the actual amount of such increase cannot be determined, and there can be no assurance any increase will be realized. Because the Company has emphasized variable rate instruments in its loan and investment portfolios, it tends to benefit from higher interest rate environments. As a result of the Federal Reserve rate increases in 2022 and 2023, net interest income has increased and exceeded prior period levels. Future Federal Reserve rate reductions may result in a return to lower net interest income levels.


	Net portfolio value at				Net interest income
	September 30, 2023				September 30, 2023
			Percentage				Percentage
Rate scenario	Amount		change		Amount		change
		(Dollars in thousands)

+200 basis points	$	1,158,060		7.30%	$	412,039		12.62%
+100 basis points		1,119,623		3.73%		388,932		6.30%
Flat rate		1,079,312		—		365,879		—
-100 basis points		1,032,247		(4.36)%		342,300		(6.44)%
-200 basis points		979,141		(9.28)%		318,403		(12.98)%

Financial Condition

General.Our total assets at September 30, ~~2017~~2023 were ~~$3.99~~$7.47 billion, of which our total loans were ~~$1.37 billion.~~$5.20 billion, and our commercial loans, at fair value, were $379.6 million. At December 31, ~~2016,~~2022, our total assets were ~~$4.86~~$7.90 billion, of which our total loans were ~~$1.22 billion.~~

$5.49 billion, and our commercial loans, at fair value were $589.1 million. The decrease in assets reflected ~~the exit of less profitable deposit relationships.~~ decreases both in SBLOC and IBLOC loan balances and in commercial loans, at fair value as that portfolio continues to run off.

~~Interest earning deposits and federal funds sold.~~ Interest-earning Deposits

At September 30, ~~2017,~~2023, we had a total of ~~$328.0~~$898.5 million of ~~interest earning~~interest-earning deposits compared to ~~$955.7~~$864.1 million at December 31, ~~2016, a decrease~~2022, an increase of ~~$627.7 million or 65.7%.~~$34.4 million. These deposits were comprised primarily of balances at the Federal Reserve, which pays interest on such balances. Reductions in such balances reflected deployment of such funds into higher yielding loans and securities and the exit of less profitable deposit relationships.Reserve.

Investment ~~portfolio.~~ Portfolio

For detailed information on the composition and maturity distribution of our investment portfolio, see “Note 55. Investment Securities” to the ~~Financial Statements.~~unaudited consolidated financial statements herein. Total investment securities decreased to ~~$1.28 billion~~$756.6 million at September 30, ~~2017,~~2023, a decrease of ~~$58.7~~$9.4 million, or ~~4.4%~~1.2%, from year-end 2016. The decrease in investment securities was primarily a result of prepayments on collateralized loan obligation securities. Other securities, included in the held-to-maturity classification at September 30, 2017, consisted of three securities secured by diversified portfolios of corporate securities and two single-issuer trust preferred securities.December 31, 2022.

A total of $11.0 million of other debt securities - single issuers is comprised of the following: amortized cost of two single-issuer trust preferred securities of $11.0 million, of which one security for $1.9 million was issued by a bank and one security for $9.1 million was issued by an insurance company.

~~A total of $75.4 million of other debt securities – pooled is comprised of three securities consisting of diversified portfolios of corporate securities.~~

~~The following table provides additional information related to our single issuer trust preferred securities as of September 30, 2017 (in thousands):~~

Under the accounting guidance related to ~~the recognition~~CECL, changes in fair value of ~~other-than-temporary impairment charges on debt~~ securities ~~an impairment on a debt security is deemed~~unrelated to credit losses continue to be ~~other-than-temporary if it meets~~recognized through equity. However, credit-related losses are recognized through an allowance, rather than through a reduction in the ~~following conditions: (i) we intend to sell or it is more likely than not we will be required to sell the security before a recovery in value, or (ii) we do not expect to recover the entire~~ amortized cost ~~basis~~ of the security. ~~If we intend to sell or it is more likely than~~CECL accounting guidance also permits the reversal of allowances for credit deterioration in future periods based on improvements in credit, which was not ~~we will be required to sell the security before a recovery~~included in value, a charge is recorded in net realized capital losses equal to the difference between the fair value and amortized cost basis of the security. For those other-than-temporarily impaired debt securities which do not meet the first condition and for which we do not expect to recover the entire amortized cost basis, the difference between the security’s amortized cost basis and the fair value is separated into the portion representing a credit impairment, which is recorded in net realized capital losses, and the remaining impairment, which is recorded in other comprehensive income.previous guidance. Generally, a security’s ~~credit impairment~~credit-related loss is the difference between its amortized cost basis and the best estimate of its expected future cash flows discounted at the security’s effective ~~yield~~yield. That difference is recognized through the income statement, as with prior ~~to impairment. The previous amortized cost basis less the impairment recognized in net realized capital losses becomes the security’s new cost basis.~~guidance, but is renamed a provision for credit loss. For the nine months ended September 30, ~~2017~~2023 and ~~September 30, 2016,~~2022, we recognized no ~~other-than-temporary impairment charges related to trust preferred securities classified in~~credit-related losses on our ~~held-to-maturity~~ portfolio.

Investments in FHLB, ACBB and Federal ~~Home Loan and Atlantic Central Bankers~~Reserve Bank stock are recorded at cost and amounted to ~~$991,000~~$20.2 million at September 30, ~~2017, compared to $1.6~~2023 and $12.6 million at December 31, ~~2016.~~2022. Each of these institutions require their correspondent banking institutions to hold stock as a condition of membership. The ~~decrease resulted from~~Bank’s conversion to a ~~decrease~~national charter required the purchase of $11.0 million of Federal Reserve Bank stock in September 2022. Additionally, in the second quarter of 2023, we joined the FHLB of Des Moines, which required a $9.1 million purchase of stock. While a fixed stock amount is required by each of these institutions, the FHLB stock requirement increases or decreases with the level of borrowing activity.

At September 30, 2023 and December 31, 2022 no investment securities were encumbered, as lines of credit established for borrowings were collateralized by loans.

The following table shows the contractual maturity distribution and the weighted average yield of our investment portfolio securities as of September 30, 2023 (dollars in thousands). The weighted average yield was calculated by dividing the amount of ~~Federal Home Loan Bank stock that entity periodically requests be~~individual securities to total securities in each category, multiplying by the yield of the individual security and adding the results of those individual computations.


				After			After
	Zero			one to			five to			Over
	to one		Average	five		Average	ten		Average	ten		Average
Available-for-sale	year		yield	years		yield	years		yield	years		yield	Total
U.S. Government agency securities	$	—	—	$	9,464	2.69%	$	14,301	5.04%	$	9,262	3.90%	$	33,027
Asset-backed securities		4,287	6.94%		—	—		201,639	7.21%		125,572	7.32%		331,498
Tax-exempt obligations of states and political subdivisions⁽¹⁾		—	—		2,789	2.80%		1,190	3.83%		654	3.95%		4,633
Taxable obligations of states and political subdivisions		7,546	2.84%		33,043	3.30%		1,128	4.33%		—	—		41,717
Residential mortgage-backed securities		1,432	2.78%		42,872	2.67%		41,686	3.94%		74,051	3.72%		160,041
Collateralized mortgage obligation securities		—	—		5,461	2.66%		290	2.25%		29,841	4.09%		35,592
Commercial mortgage-backed securities		10,728	2.55%		32,520	2.65%		27,409	3.53%		73,191	3.00%		143,848
Corporate debt securities		—	—		—	—		—	—		6,280	—		6,280
Total	$	23,993		$	126,149		$	287,643		$	318,851		$	756,636
Weighted average yield			3.44%			2.83%			6.25%			4.94%

⁽¹⁾If adjusted to ~~its level~~their taxable equivalents, yields would approximate 3.54%, 4.85%, and 5.00% for one to five years, five to ten years, and over ten years, respectively, at a federal tax rate of ~~services.~~ 21%.

~~Investment securities with a carrying~~Commercial Loans, at Fair Value

Commercial loans, at fair value ~~of $606.8 million at September 30, 2017 and $607.2 million at December 31, 2016, were pledged as collateral for Federal Home Loan Bank advances and letters of credit as required or permitted by law.~~

~~Loans held for sale. Loans held for sale~~ are comprised of non-SBA commercial ~~mortgage~~real estate loans and SBA loans which had been originated for sale or securitization inthrough first quarter 2020, and which are now being held on the ~~secondary market. The~~balance sheet. SBA loans are valued on a pooled basis and commercial real estate bridge loans are valued individually. Commercial loans, at fair value of commercial mortgage loans and the SBA loans originated for sale is based on purchase commitments, quoted prices for the same or similar loans or fair market valuations based on other market information. Commercial loans held for sale decreased to ~~$380.3~~$379.6 million at September 30, ~~2017~~2023 from ~~$663.1~~$589.1 million at December 31, 2016. The decrease reflected a difference in the timing of loan originations and related sales. The December balance had accumulated until its recording as a sale in first quarter 2017 while the lower September balance reflected2022, primarily reflecting the impact of ~~a sale in~~loan repayments as this portfolio runs

off. These loans continue to be accounted for at fair value. In the third quarter ~~2017.~~of 2021 we resumed originating non-SBA commercial real estate loans, after suspending such originations in the first quarter of 2020. These originations reflect lending criteria similar to the existing loan portfolio and are primarily comprised of multi-family (apartment buildings) collateral. The new originations, which are intended to be held for investment, are accounted for at amortized cost.

Loan ~~portfolio.~~ Portfolio. Total loans ~~increased~~decreased to ~~$1.37~~$5.20 billion at September 30, ~~2017~~2023 from ~~$1.22~~$5.49 billion at December 31, ~~2016.~~2022.

The following table summarizes our loan portfolio, ~~not including~~excluding loans held ~~for sale,~~at fair value, by loan category for the periods indicated (in

thousands):


	September 30,		December 31,
	2023		2022
SBL non-real estate	$	130,579	$	108,954
SBL commercial mortgage		547,107		474,496
SBL construction		19,204		30,864
SBLs		696,890		614,314
Direct lease financing		670,208		632,160
SBLOC / IBLOC⁽¹⁾		1,720,513		2,332,469
Advisor financing⁽²⁾		199,442		172,468
Real estate bridge loans		1,848,224		1,669,031
Other loans⁽³⁾		55,800		61,679
		5,191,077		5,482,121
Unamortized loan fees and costs		7,895		4,732
Total loans, including unamortized loan fees and costs	$	5,198,972	$	5,486,853


	September 30,		December 31,
	2023		2022
SBLs, including costs net of deferred fees of $8,900 and $7,327
for September 30, 2023 and December 31, 2022, respectively	$	705,790	$	621,641
SBLs included in commercial loans, at fair value		126,543		146,717
Total SBLs⁽⁴⁾	$	832,333	$	768,358

⁽¹⁾SBLOC are collateralized by marketable securities, while IBLOC, are collateralized by the cash surrender value of insurance policies. At September 30, 2023 and December 31, 2022, IBLOC loans amounted to $712.6 million and $1.12 billion, respectively.

⁽²⁾In 2020, we began originating loans to investment advisors for purposes of debt refinancing, acquisition of another firm or internal succession. Maximum loan amounts are subject to loan-to-value (“LTV”) ratios of 70% of the business enterprise value based on a third party valuation, but may be increased depending upon the debt service coverage ratio. Personal guarantees and blanket business liens are obtained as appropriate.

⁽³⁾Includes demand deposit overdrafts reclassified as loan balances totaling $215,000 and $2.6 million at September 30, 2023 and December 31, 2022, respectively. Estimated overdraft charge-offs and recoveries are reflected in the ACL and are immaterial.

⁽⁴⁾The SBLs held at fair value are comprised of the government guaranteed portion of 7(a) Program loans at the dates indicated.

The following table ~~shows~~summarizes our SBL portfolio, including loans held at fair value, by loan category as of September 30, 2023 (in thousands):


	Loan principal
U.S. government guaranteed portion of SBA loans⁽¹⁾	$	391,301
PPP loans⁽¹⁾		2,277
Commercial mortgage SBA⁽²⁾		273,122
Construction SBA⁽³⁾		10,993
Non-guaranteed portion of U.S. government guaranteed 7(a) Program loans⁽⁴⁾		109,343
Non-SBA SBLs		34,592
Total principal	$	821,628
Unamortized fees and costs		10,705
Total SBLs	$	832,333

⁽¹⁾Includes the portion of SBA 7(a) Program loans and PPP loans which have been guaranteed by the U.S. government, and therefore are assumed to have no credit risk.

⁽²⁾Substantially all these loans are made under the 504 Program, which dictates origination date LTV percentages, generally 50-60%, to which The Bank adheres.

⁽³⁾Includes $4.1 million in 504 Program first mortgages with an origination date LTV of 50-60% and $6.9 million in SBA interim loans with an approved SBA post-construction full takeout/payoff.

⁽⁴⁾Includes the unguaranteed portion of 7(a) Program loans which are generally 70% or more guaranteed by the U.S. government. SBA 7(a) Program loans are not made on the basis of real estate LTV; however, they are subject to SBA's "All Available Collateral" rule which mandates that to the extent a borrower or its 20% or greater principals have available collateral (including personal residences), the collateral must be pledged to fully collateralize the loan, after applying SBA-determined liquidation rates. In addition, all 7(a) Program loans and 504 Program loans require the personal guaranty of all 20% or greater owners.

The following table summarizes our SBL portfolio, excluding the government guaranteed portion of SBA 7(a) Program loans and PPP loans,by loan type as of September 30, 2023 (dollars in thousands):


	SBL commercial mortgage⁽¹⁾		SBL construction⁽¹⁾		SBL non-real estate		Total		% Total
Hotels (except casino hotels) and motels	$	73,598	$	71	$	18	$	73,687	17%
Full-service restaurants		24,413		5,532		1,873		31,818	7%
Funeral homes and funeral services		27,365		—		45		27,410	6%
Car washes		19,000		—		101		19,101	4%
Child day care services		14,951		1,222		1,351		17,524	4%
Outpatient mental health and substance abuse centers		15,489		—		118		15,607	4%
Homes for the elderly		13,032		—		73		13,105	3%
Gasoline stations with convenience stores		12,448		—		152		12,600	3%
Fitness and recreational sports centers		7,790		—		1,764		9,554	2%
Lessors of other real estate property		8,806		—		599		9,405	2%
Offices of lawyers		9,240		—		—		9,240	2%
General warehousing and storage		6,629		—		—		6,629	2%
Plumbing, heating, and air-conditioning companies		5,611		—		927		6,538	2%
Caterers		6,304		—		51		6,355	1%
Limited-service restaurants		2,877		927		2,549		6,353	1%
Specialty trade contractors		4,522		—		471		4,993	1%
Lessors of residential buildings and dwellings		4,847		—		—		4,847	1%
Miscellaneous durable goods merchant		4,792		—		—		4,792	1%
Packaged frozen food merchant wholesalers		4,740		—		—		4,740	1%
Technical and trade schools		4,736		—		—		4,736	1%
All other amusement and recreation		4,182		44		269		4,495	1%
Offices of dentists		3,110		—		66		3,176	1%
Vocational rehabilitation services		—		3,090		—		3,090	1%
Other warehousing and storage		3,082		—		—		3,082	1%
Other⁽²⁾		96,517		1,585		27,071		125,173	31%
Total	$	378,081	$	12,471	$	37,498	$	428,050	100%

⁽¹⁾Of the SBL commercial mortgage and SBL construction loans, $106.4 million represents the total of the non-guaranteed portion of SBA 7(a) Program loans and non-SBA loans. The balance of those categories represents SBA 504 Program loans with 50%-60% origination date LTVs.

⁽²⁾Loan types of less than $3.0 million are spread over approximately one hundred different business types.

The following table summarizes our SBL portfolio, excluding the government guaranteed portion of SBA 7(a) Program loans and PPP loans, by state as of September 30, 2023 (dollars in thousands):


	SBL commercial mortgage⁽¹⁾		SBL construction⁽¹⁾		SBL non-real estate		Total		% Total
California	$	78,252	$	4,306	$	3,193	$	85,751	20%
Florida		69,092		912		3,355		73,359	17%
North Carolina		38,507		927		1,875		41,309	10%
New York		24,144		1,297		3,170		28,611	7%
New Jersey		17,370		3,357		3,970		24,697	6%
Texas		18,819		—		4,435		23,254	5%
Pennsylvania		20,822		—		802		21,624	5%
Georgia		18,000		576		1,522		20,098	5%
Other States <$15 million		93,075		1,096		15,176		109,347	25%
Total	$	378,081	$	12,471	$	37,498	$	428,050	100%

The following table summarizes the ten largest loans in our SBL portfolio, including loans held at fair value, as of September 30, 2023 (in thousands):


Type⁽¹⁾	State	SBL commercial mortgage
Mental health and substance abuse center	Florida	$	9,964
Funeral homes and funeral services	Maine		9,008
Hotel	Florida		8,454
Offices of lawyers	California		8,215
Hotel	North Carolina		6,722
General warehousing and storage	Pennsylvania		6,629
Hotel	Florida		5,781
Hotel	New York		5,724
Hotel	North Carolina		5,635
Mental health and substance abuse center	New Jersey		5,150
Total		$	71,282

⁽¹⁾The table above does not include loans to the extent that they are U.S. government guaranteed.

Commercial real estate loans, primarily real estate bridge loans and excluding SBA loans, were as follows as of September 30, 2023 (dollars in thousands):


	# Loans	Balance		Weighted average origination date LTV		Weighted average interest rate
Real estate bridge loans (multi-family apartment loans recorded at book value)⁽¹⁾	139	$	1,848,224		71%		9.30%

Non-SBA commercial real estate loans, at fair value:
Multi-family (apartment bridge loans)⁽¹⁾	11	$	206,604		76%		8.80%
Hospitality (hotels and lodging)	2		27,392		65%		9.80%
Retail	2		12,282		72%		7.30%
Other	2		9,486		73%		5.00%
	17		255,764		75%		8.69%
Fair value adjustment			(2,704)
Total non-SBA commercial real estate loans, at fair value			253,060
Total commercial real estate loans		$	2,101,284		72%		9.24%

⁽¹⁾In the third quarter of 2021, we resumed the origination of multi-family apartment loans. These are similar to the multi-family apartment loans carried at fair value, but at origination are intended to be held on the balance sheet, so they are not accounted for at fair value.

The following table summarizes our commercial real estate loans, primarily real estate bridge loans and excluding SBA loans, ~~held~~by state as of September 30, 2023 (dollars in thousands):


	Balance		Origination date LTV
Texas	$	779,935		73%
Georgia		243,097		69%
Florida		204,798		70%
Tennessee		87,846		70%
Michigan		82,493		71%
Ohio		72,356		67%
Indiana		66,432		72%
Other States each <$65 million		564,327		73%
Total	$	2,101,284		72%

The following table summarizes our fifteen largest commercial real estate loans, primarily real estate bridge loans and excluding SBA loans, as of September 30, 2023 (dollars in thousands). All of these loans are multi-family loans.


	Balance		Origination date LTV
Texas	$	45,520		75%
Texas		44,159		72%
Tennessee		40,000		72%
Texas		39,400		75%
Texas		39,345		79%
Texas		37,259		80%
Michigan		36,733		62%
Florida		34,850		72%
Indiana		33,588		76%
Texas		32,812		62%
Texas		32,616		67%
Michigan		32,500		79%
Oklahoma		31,153		78%
Tennessee		30,361		71%
Georgia		29,290		69%
15 largest commercial real estate loans	$	539,586		73%

The following table summarizes our institutional banking portfolio by type as of September 30, 2023 (dollars in thousands):


Type	Principal		% of total
SBLOC	$	1,007,922	52%
IBLOC		712,591	37%
Advisor financing		199,442	11%
Total	$	1,919,955	100%

For SBLOC, we generally lend up to 50% of the value of equities and 80% for ~~sale at~~investment grade securities. While the ~~dates indicated (in~~value of equities has fallen in excess of 30% in recent years, the reduction in collateral value of brokerage accounts collateralizing SBLOCs generally has been less. This is because many collateral accounts are “balanced” and accordingly, have a component of debt securities, which have either not decreased in value as much as equities, or in some cases may have increased in value. Further, many of these accounts have the benefit of professional investment advisors who provided some protection against market downturns, through diversification and other means. Additionally, borrowers often utilize only a portion of collateral value, which lowers the percentage of principal to the market value of collateral.

The following table summarizes our ten largest SBLOC loans as of September 30, 2023 (dollars in thousands):


	Principal amount		% Principal to collateral
	$	12,232		25%
		9,465		39%
		9,035		44%
		8,715		62%
		8,530		95%
		8,086		77%
		7,906		71%
		7,734		28%
		7,346		75%
		6,827		34%
Total and weighted average	$	85,876		54%

IBLOC loans are backed by the cash value of life insurance policies which have been assigned to us. We generally lend up to 95% of such cash value. Our underwriting standards require approval of the insurance companies which carry the policies backing these loans. Currently, fifteen insurance companies have been approved and, as of September 30, 2023, all were rated A- or better by AM Best.

The following table summarizes our direct lease financing portfolio by type as of September 30, 2023 (dollars in thousands):


	Principal balance⁽¹⁾		% Total
Construction	$	118,347		18%
Waste management and remediation services		91,255		14%
Government agencies and public institutions⁽²⁾		88,547		13%
Real estate and rental and leasing		58,460		9%
Manufacturing		41,002		6%
Health care and social assistance		33,960		5%
Retail trade		33,917		5%
Finance and insurance		31,004		5%
Professional, scientific, and technical services		26,648		4%
Wholesale trade		16,069		2%
Transportation and warehousing		11,168		2%
Mining, quarrying, and oil and gas extraction		10,712		2%
Water supply and irrigation systems		8,721		1%
Other		100,398		14%
Total	$	670,208		100%

⁽¹⁾Of the total $670.2 million of direct lease financing, $588.2 million consisted of vehicle leases with the remaining balance consisting of equipment leases.

⁽²⁾Includes public universities and school districts.

The following table summarizes our direct lease financing portfolio by state as of September 30, 2023 (dollars in thousands):


	Principal balance		% Total
Florida	$	99,592		15%
Utah		66,068		10%
California		60,145		9%
Pennsylvania		41,156		6%
New Jersey		38,488		6%
New York		34,802		5%
North Carolina		33,841		5%
Texas		31,400		5%
Maryland		30,563		5%
Connecticut		28,398		4%
Idaho		16,559		2%
Washington		15,439		2%
Georgia		14,202		2%
Ohio		12,683		2%
Alabama		11,165		2%
Other States		135,707		20%
Total	$	670,208		100%

The following table presents loan categories by maturity for the period indicated. Actual repayments historically have, and will likely in the future, differ significantly from contractual maturities because individual borrowers generally have the right to prepay loans, with or without prepayment penalties. See “Asset and Liability Management” in this MD&A for a discussion of interest rate risk.


		September 30, 2023
		Within		One to five		After five but
		one year		years		within 15 years		After 15 years		Total
		(Dollars in thousands)
SBL non-real estate	$	4,785	$	30,919	$	136,060	$	1,146	$	172,910
SBL commercial mortgage		15,930		18,120		161,030		444,974		640,054
SBL construction		7,051		—		—		12,318		19,369
Leasing		124,748		522,862		22,598		—		670,208
SBLOC/IBLOC		1,720,513		—		—		—		1,720,513
Advisor financing		87		51,997		147,358		—		199,442
Real estate bridge lending		—		1,848,224		—		—		1,848,224
Other loans		26,434		4,148		7,438		16,775		54,795
Loans at fair value excluding SBL		234,486		18,574		—		—		253,060
	$	2,134,034	$	2,494,844	$	474,484	$	475,213	$	5,578,575

Loan maturities after one year with:
Fixed rates
SBL non-real estate			$	2,277	$	—	$	—	$	2,277
Leasing				522,862		22,598		—		545,460
Advisor financing				51,997		147,358		—		199,355
Other loans				3,619		470		16,775		20,864
Loans at fair value excluding SBL				18,574		—		—		18,574
Total loans at fixed rates			$	599,329	$	170,426	$	16,775	$	786,530

Variable rates
SBL non-real estate			$	28,642	$	136,060	$	1,146	$	165,848
SBL commercial mortgage				18,120		161,030		444,974		624,124
SBL construction				—		—		12,318		12,318
Real estate bridge lending				1,848,224		—		—		1,848,224
Other loans				529		6,968		—		7,497
Total at variable rates			$	1,895,515	$	304,058	$	458,438	$	2,658,011

Total			$	2,494,844	$	474,484	$	475,213	$	3,444,541

Allowance for ~~loan and lease losses.~~Credit Losses

We review the adequacy of our ~~allowance for loan and lease losses~~ACL on at least a quarterly basis to determine ~~that the~~a provision for ~~loan~~credit losses ~~is made in an amount necessary~~ to maintain our ~~allowance~~ACL at a level ~~that~~we believe is appropriate ~~based on management’s estimate of inherent losses. Our estimates of loan and lease~~to recognize current expected credit losses ~~are intended to, and, in management’s opinion, do, meet the criteria for accrual of loss contingencies in accordance with ASC 450, “Contingencies”, and ASC 310, “Receivables”~~. The process of evaluating this adequacy has two basic elements: first, the identification of problem loans or leases based on current financial information and the fair value of the underlying collateral; and second, a methodology for estimating general loss reserves. For loans or leases classified as “special mention,” “substandard” or “doubtful,” we reserve all losses inherent in the portfolio at the time we classify the loan or lease. This “specific” portion of the allowance is the total of potential, although unconfirmed, losses for individually classified loans. In this process, we establish specific reserves based on an analysis of the most probable sources of repayment and liquidation of collateral. While each impaired loan is individually evaluated, not every loan requires a reserve when the collateral value and estimated cash flows exceed the current balance.

The second phase of our analysis represents an allocation of the allowance. This methodology analyzes pools of loans that have similar characteristics and applies historical loss experience and other factors for each pool including management’s experience with similar loan and lease portfolios at other institutions, the historic loss experience of our peers and a review of statistical information from various industry reports to determine the allocable portion of the allowance. This estimate is intended to represent the potential unconfirmed and inherent losses within the portfolio. Individual loan pools are created for the following major loan categories: SBLOCs, SBA loans, direct lease financing and other specialty lending and consumer loans. We augment historical experience for each loan pool by accounting for such items as current economic conditions, current loan portfolio performance, loan policy or management changes, loan concentrations, increases in our lending limit, average loan size and other factors as appropriate. Our Chief Credit Officer oversees the loan review department, ~~processes and~~which measures the adequacy of the ~~allowance for loan and lease losses~~ACL independently of loan production ~~officers.~~ officers. For detailed information on the ACL methodology, see “Note 6. Loans” to the unaudited consolidated financial statements herein.

At September 30, 2023, the ACL amounted to $24.1 million, which represented a $1.8 million increase compared to the $22.4 million ACL at December 31, 2022. The increase reflected the impact of higher net charge-offs, as total loans outstanding decreased.

A description of loan review coverage targets is set forth below.

The following loan review percentages are performed over periods of eighteen to twenty-four months. At September 30, ~~2017,~~2023, in excess of 50% of the total ~~continuing~~ loan portfolio ~~had been~~was reviewed by the loan review department or, for SBLs, rated internally by that department. In addition to the review of all loans classified as ~~a result of~~either special mention or substandard, the ~~coverage of each loan portfolio type. The~~ targeted coverages and scope of the reviews are risk-based and vary according to each ~~portfolio. These thresholds are maintained~~portfolio as follows:

~~Securities Backed Lines of Credit~~SBLOC – The targeted review threshold ~~for 2017~~ is 40%, ~~with~~including a sample focusing on the largest 25% of SBLOCs by ~~commitment to be reviewed annually.~~commitment. A random ~~sampling~~sample of ~~a minimum of 20 of the remaining~~at least twenty loans will be reviewed each quarter. At September 30, ~~2017,~~2023, approximately ~~50%~~45% of the SBLOC portfolio had been reviewed.

~~SBA Loans~~IBLOC – The targeted review threshold ~~for 2017~~ is 40%, including a sample focusing on the largest 25% of IBLOCs by commitment. A random sample of at least twenty loans will be reviewed each quarter. At September 30, 2023, approximately 51% of the IBLOC portfolio had been reviewed.

Advisor Financing – The targeted review threshold is 50%. At September 30, 2023, approximately 100% of the advisor financing portfolio had been reviewed. The loan balance review threshold is $1.0 million.

SBLs – The targeted review threshold is 60%, to be rated and/or reviewed within 90 days of funding, ~~less~~excluding fully guaranteed ~~portions of any~~loans purchased for CRA purposes, and fully guaranteed PPP loans. The ~~100% coverage~~loan balance review threshold is $1.5 million and additionally includes ~~loan review work performed by designated SBA department personnel.~~any classified loans. At September 30, ~~2017,~~2023, approximately ~~100%~~72% of the ~~government~~non-government guaranteed SBL loan portfolio had been reviewed. ~~The review threshold for the independent loan review department is $1,000,000.~~

~~Leasing~~Direct Lease Financing – The targeted review threshold ~~for 2017~~ is 35%. At September 30, ~~2017,~~2023, approximately ~~53%~~42% of the leasing portfolio had been reviewed. The loan balance review threshold is ~~$1,000,000.~~$1.5 million.

~~CMBS (Floating Rate)~~ Commercial Real Estate Bridge Loans, at fair value and Commercial Real Estate Bridge Loans, at amortized cost(floating rate, excluding SBA, which are included in SBLs above) – The targeted review threshold ~~for 2017~~ is ~~100%~~60%. Floating rate loans will be reviewed initially within 90 days of funding and will be monitored on an ongoing basis as to payment status. Subsequent reviews will be performed ~~based on a sampling each quarter. Each floating rate loan will be reviewed if any available extension options are exercised.~~for relationships over $10.0 million. At September 30, ~~2017,~~2023, approximately 100% of the ~~CMBS~~ floating rate, non-SBA commercial real estate bridge loans ~~on the books~~outstanding for more than 90 days had been reviewed.

~~CMBS (Fixed Rate)~~ – ~~100% of~~ Commercial Real Estate Loans, at fair value(fixed rate, ~~loans that~~excluding SBA, which are ~~unable to be readily sold on the secondary market and remain on the Bank's books after nine months will be reviewed at least annually.~~included in SBLs above)– The targeted review threshold is 100%. At September 30, ~~2017, 100% of the CMBS fixed rate portfolio had been reviewed.~~

~~Specialty Lending~~ – Specialty Lending, defined as commercial loans unique in nature that do not fit into other established categories, will have a review coverage threshold of 100% for non CRA loans. At September 30, 2017,2023, approximately 100% of the ~~non CRA loans~~fixed rate, non-SBA commercial real estate loan portfolio had been reviewed.

~~Home Equity Lines of Credit (HELOC) – The targeted review threshold for 2017 is 50%. The largest 25% of HELOCs by commitment will be~~Other minor loan categories are reviewed ~~annually. A random sampling of a minimum of ten~~at the discretion of the ~~remaining loans will be reviewed each quarter. At September 30, 2017, approximately 84% of the HELOC portfolio had been reviewed~~.loan review department.

The following ~~table presents~~tables present delinquencies by type of loan as ~~follows~~of the dates specified (in thousands):



	September 30, 2023
	30-59 Days		60-89 Days		90+ Days				Total				Total
	past due		past due		still accruing		Non-accrual		past due		Current		loans
SBL non-real estate	$	186	$	389	$	358	$	1,256	$	2,189	$	128,390	$	130,579
SBL commercial mortgage		—		1		—		2,945		2,946		544,161		547,107
SBL construction		—		—		—		3,385		3,385		15,819		19,204
Direct lease financing		3,021		1,672		207		3,351		8,251		661,957		670,208
SBLOC / IBLOC		11,947		2,691		75		475		15,188		1,705,325		1,720,513
Advisor financing		—		—		—		—		—		199,442		199,442
Real estate bridge loans		—		—		—		—		—		1,848,224		1,848,224
Other loans		302		40		37		3,688		4,067		51,733		55,800
Unamortized loan fees and costs		—		—		—		—		—		7,895		7,895
	$	15,456	$	4,793	$	677	$	15,100	$	36,026	$	5,162,946	$	5,198,972



	December 31, 2022
	30-59 Days		60-89 Days		90+ Days				Total				Total
	past due		past due		still accruing		Non-accrual		past due		Current		loans
SBL non-real estate	$	1,312	$	543	$	346	$	1,249	$	3,450	$	105,504	$	108,954
SBL commercial mortgage		1,853		5		297		1,423		3,578		470,918		474,496
SBL construction		—		—		—		3,386		3,386		27,478		30,864
Direct lease financing		4,035		2,053		539		3,550		10,177		621,983		632,160
SBLOC / IBLOC		14,782		343		2,869		—		17,994		2,314,475		2,332,469
Advisor financing		—		—		—		—		—		172,468		172,468
Real estate bridge loans		—		—		—		—		—		1,669,031		1,669,031
Other loans		330		90		3,724		748		4,892		56,787		61,679
Unamortized loan fees and costs		—		—		—		—		—		4,732		4,732
	$	22,312	$	3,034	$	7,775	$	10,356	$	43,477	$	5,443,376	$	5,486,853

Although we consider our ~~allowance for loan and lease losses~~ACL to be adequate based on information currently available, future additions to the ~~allowance~~ACL may be necessary due to changes in economic conditions, our ongoing loss experience and that of our peers, changes in management’s assumptions as to future delinquencies, recoveries and losses, deterioration of specific credits and management’s intent with regard to the disposition of loans and leases.

The following table summarizes select asset quality ratios for each of the periods indicated:

As of or

for the nine months ended

September 30,

2017

2016

Ratio of the allowance for loan losses to total loans

0.53%

0.51%
Ratio of the allowance for loan losses to nonperforming loans *

137.23%

87.12%
Ratio of nonperforming assets to total assets *

0.13%

0.16%
Ratio of net charge-offs to average loans

0.07%

0.01%
Ratio of net charge-offs to average loans annualized

0.09%

0.01%

* Includes loans 90 days past due still accruing interest.


	For the nine months ended		For the year ended
	or as of September 30,		or as of December 31,
	2023	2022	2022
Ratio of:
ACL to total loans	0.46%	0.37%	0.41%
ACL to non-performing loans⁽¹⁾	153.04%	237.93%	123.40%
Non-performing loans to total loans⁽¹⁾	0.30%	0.16%	0.33%
Non-performing assets to total assets⁽¹⁾	0.46%	0.35%	0.50%
Net charge-offs to average loans	0.05%	0.02%	0.03%

⁽¹⁾Includes loans 90 days past due still accruing interest.

The ratio of the ~~allowance for loan and lease losses~~ACL to total loans ~~was 0.53%~~increased to 0.46% as of September 30, 2023 from 0.37% at September 30, ~~2017, compared to 0.51% at September 30, 2016.~~2022. The ~~higher current period ratio reflected an~~increase resulted from a decrease in total loans while the ACL increased. The increase in the ~~allowance which exceeded proportional loan growth during~~ACL reflected $970,000 of increased reserves on specific distressed credits, in addition to the ~~period.~~ impact of higher net charge-offs and higher qualitative components related to increased risk levels for economic factors and for collateral risks related to leasing. See “Note 6. Loans” to the unaudited consolidated financial statements herein.

The ratio of the ~~allowance for loan losses~~ACL to non-performing loans ~~increased~~decreased to ~~137.23%~~153.04% at September 30, ~~2017,~~2023, from ~~87.12%~~237.93% at September 30, ~~2016,~~2022, primarily as a result of ~~a decrease~~the increase in non-performing loans ~~and an~~which proportionately exceeded the increase in the ~~allowance.~~ ACL. As a result of the increase in non-performing loans, the ratio of non-performing loans to total loans also increased to 0.30% at September 30, 2023 from 0.16% at September 30, 2022.

The ratio of non-performing assets to total assets ~~decreased~~increased to ~~0.13%~~0.46% at September 30, ~~2017,~~2023 from ~~0.16%~~0.35% at September 30, ~~2016, primarily as a result of a decrease~~2022, again reflecting the increase in non-performing loans. ~~Net~~

The ratio of net charge-offs to average loans ~~increased to 0.07%~~was 0.05% for the nine months ended September 30, ~~2017, from 0.01%~~2023 and 0.02% for the nine months ended September 30, ~~2016, primarily as a result~~2022. While net charge-offs increased between those periods, increases in average loans partially offset the impact of ~~higher net charge offs.~~ such increases.

Net ~~charge-offs.~~ Charge-offs

Net charge-offs were ~~$1.2~~$2.6 million for the nine months ended September 30, ~~2017,~~2023, an increase of ~~$1.0~~$1.6 million from net charge-offs of ~~$152,000~~$1.0 million during the ~~same period~~nine months ended September 30, 2022. Charge-offs in both periods resulted primarily from non-real estate SBL and leasing charge-offs. SBL charge-offs resulted primarily from the non-government guaranteed portion of ~~2016.~~ SBA loans.

The ~~majority~~following tables reflect the relationship of year-to-date average loans outstanding, based upon quarter end balances, and net charge-offs by loan category (dollars in thousands):


	September 30, 2023
	SBL non-real estate		SBL commercial mortgage		SBL construction		Direct lease financing		SBLOC / IBLOC		Advisor financing		Real estate bridge loans		Other loans
Charge-offs	$	871	$	—	$	—	$	2,804	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	3
Recoveries		(446)		(75)		—		(220)		—		—		—		(299)
Net charge-offs	$	425	$	(75)	$	—	$	2,584	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	(296)

Average loan balance	$	120,845	$	518,304	$	28,264	$	660,022	$	1,885,857	$	187,414	$	1,808,924	$	57,218
Ratio of net charge-offs during the period to average loans during the period		0.35%		(0.01)%		—		0.39%		—		—		—		(0.51)%


	September 30, 2022
	SBL non-real estate		SBL commercial mortgage		SBL construction		Direct lease financing		SBLOC / IBLOC		Advisor financing		Real estate bridge loans		Other loans
Charge-offs	$	861	$	—	$	—	$	312	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—
Recoveries		(57)		—		—		(108)		—		—		—		—
Net charge-offs	$	804	$	—	$	—	$	204	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—

Average loan balance	$	124,761	$	400,454	$	28,129	$	563,128	$	2,160,044	$	146,506	$	1,005,043	$	48,651
Ratio of net charge-offs during the period to average loans during the period		0.64%		—		—		0.04%		—		—		—		—

We review charge-offs at least quarterly in loan surveillance meetings which include the chief credit officer, the loan review department and other senior credit officers in a process which includes identifying any trends or other factors impacting portfolio management. In recent periods charge-offs have been primarily comprised of the non-guaranteed portion of SBA 7a loans and leases. The charge-offs ~~in the first nine months of 2017 were associated with leasing relationships. The majority of the charge-offs in the first nine months of 2016 were associated with SBA non real estate~~have resulted from individual borrower or business circumstances as opposed to overall trends or other factors.

Non-accrual Loans, Loans 90 Days Delinquent and ~~leasing relationships.~~Still Accruing, OREO, Modified Loans and Troubled Debt Restructurings.

~~Non-performing loans, loans 90 days delinquent and still accruing, and troubled debt restructurings.~~ Loans are considered to be non-performing if they are on a non-accrual basis or they are past due 90 days or more and still accruing interest. A loan which is past due 90 days or more and still accruing interest remains on accrual status only when it is both adequately secured as to principal and interest, and is in the process of collection. ~~Troubled debt restructurings are loans with terms that have been renegotiated to provide a reduction or deferral~~We had $18.8 million of ~~interest or principal because~~OREO at September 30, 2023 and $21.2 million of ~~a weakening in the financial positions of the borrowers.~~OREO at December 31, 2022. The following tables summarize our non-performing loans, ~~other real estate owned~~OREO, and loans past due 90 days or more still accruing ~~interest (in thousands).~~ interest.



		~~September 30,~~		~~December 31,~~



	September 30,		December 31,
	2023		2022
	(Dollars in thousands)
Non-accrual loans
SBL non-real estate	$	1,256	$	1,249
SBL commercial mortgage		2,945		1,423
SBL construction		3,385		3,386
Direct leasing		3,351		3,550
IBLOC		475		—
Legacy commercial real estate and Other loans		3,688		692
Consumer - home equity		—		56
Total non-accrual loans		15,100		10,356

Loans past due 90 days or more and still accruing		677		7,775
Total non-performing loans		15,777		18,131
OREO		18,756		21,210
Total non-performing assets	$	34,533	$	39,341

2017

2016

Non-accrual loans

SBA non real estate

$                 2,310

$                  1,530
SBA commercial mortgage

1,226

-
Consumer

1,417

1,442
Total non-accrual loans

4,953

2,972

Loans past due 90 days or more

354

661
Total non-performing loans

5,307

3,633
Other real estate owned

-

104
Total non-performing assets

$                 5,307

$                  3,737

~~Loans that were modified as~~Effective January 1, 2023 loan modifications to borrowers experiencing financial difficulty are required to be disclosed by type of ~~September 30, 2017~~modification and ~~December 31, 2016 and considered troubled debt restructurings are as follows (dollars in thousands):~~

~~The balances below provide information as to how the~~by type of loan. Prior accounting guidance classified loans which were modified as troubled debt restructurings only if the modification reflected a concession from the lender in the form of a below market interest rate or other concession in addition to borrower financial difficulty. Under the new guidance, loans atwith modifications will be reported whether a concession is made or not. Loans previously classified as troubled debt restructurings will continue to be reported in “Note 6. Loans“ to the unaudited consolidated financial statements herein. Modifications made after January 1, 2023 will be reported under the new loan modification guidance. As of September 30, ~~2017 and December 31, 2016 (in thousands).~~2023, there was one modified loan reportable under the new guidance, with a balance of $156,000, which had a $2,200 reduction in monthly payment for 6 months.

~~The following table summarizes,~~We had no commitments to extend additional credit to loans classified as either modified or troubled debt restructurings as of September 30, ~~2017, loans that had been restructured within the last 12 months that have subsequently defaulted.~~

Number

Pre-modification recorded investment
SBA non real estate

2

$ 679
Total

2

$ 679

~~As of September 30, 2017 and~~2023 or December 31, ~~2016, we had no commitments to lend additional funds to loan customers whose terms have been modified in troubled debt restructurings.~~2022.

The following table provides information about ~~impaired~~credit deteriorated loans at September 30, ~~2017~~2023 and December 31, ~~2016:~~2022 (in thousands):



	September 30, 2023
	Recorded ‎investment		Unpaid ‎principal ‎balance		Related ‎ACL		Average ‎recorded ‎investment		Interest ‎income ‎recognized
Without an ACL recorded
SBL non-real estate	$	419	$	1,895	$	—	$	344	$	—
SBL commercial mortgage		2,034		2,034		—		899		—
Direct lease financing		115		285		—		55		—
Legacy commercial real estate		—		—		—		2,664		—
Consumer - home equity		231		231		—		262		7
With an ACL recorded
SBL non-real estate		918		918		(566)		915		2
SBL commercial mortgage		911		911		(419)		1,732		—
SBL construction		3,385		3,385		(44)		3,385		—
Direct lease financing		3,236		3,236		(774)		2,612		—
IBLOC		475		475		(17)		119		—
Legacy commercial real estate and Other loans		3,688		3,688		(11)		1,336		—
Total
SBL non-real estate		1,337		2,813		(566)		1,259		2
SBL commercial mortgage		2,945		2,945		(419)		2,631		—
SBL construction		3,385		3,385		(44)		3,385		—
Direct lease financing		3,351		3,521		(774)		2,667		—
IBLOC		475		475		(17)		119		—
Legacy commercial real estate and Other loans		3,688		3,688		(11)		4,000		—
Consumer - home equity		231		231		—		262		7
	$	15,412	$	17,058	$	(1,831)	$	14,323	$	9



	December 31, 2022
	Recorded ‎investment		Unpaid ‎principal ‎balance		Related ‎ACL		Average ‎recorded ‎investment		Interest ‎income ‎recognized
Without an ACL recorded
SBL non-real estate	$	400	$	2,762	$	—	$	388	$	—
SBL commercial mortgage		—		—		—		45		—
Direct lease financing		—		—		—		52		—
Legacy commercial real estate		3,552		3,552		—		1,421		150
Consumer - home equity		295		295		—		306		9
With an ACL recorded
SBL non-real estate		974		974		(525)		1,237		7
SBL commercial mortgage		1,423		1,423		(441)		1,090		—
SBL construction		3,386		3,386		(153)		1,245		—
Direct lease financing		3,550		3,550		(933)		710		—
Other loans		692		692		(15)		1,923		—
Total
SBL non-real estate		1,374		3,736		(525)		1,625		7
SBL commercial mortgage		1,423		1,423		(441)		1,135		—
SBL construction		3,386		3,386		(153)		1,245		—
Direct lease financing		3,550		3,550		(933)		762		—
Legacy commercial real estate and Other loans		4,244		4,244		(15)		3,344		150
Consumer - home equity		295		295		—		306		9
	$	14,272	$	16,634	$	(2,067)	$	8,417	$	166

We had ~~$5.0~~$15.1 million of non-accrual loans at September 30, ~~2017~~2023, compared to ~~$3.0~~$10.4 million of non-accrual loans at December 31, ~~2016.~~2022. The ~~$2.0~~$4.7 million increase in non-accrual loans was primarily due to ~~$3.7~~$12.0 million of loans placed on non-accrual status, partially offset by ~~$1.1~~$3.3 million transferred to repossessed vehicle inventory, $2.3 million of ~~loan~~charge-offs, $1.3 million of payments and ~~$589,000 of charge-offs.~~$400,000 returned to accrual status. Loans past due 90 days or more still accruing interest amounted to ~~$354,000~~$677,000 at September 30, ~~2017~~2023 and ~~$661,000~~$7.8 million at December 31, ~~2016.~~2022. The ~~$307,000~~$7.1 million decrease reflected ~~$1.7~~$1.8 million of additions partially offset by ~~$1.3~~$4.3 million of loan payments, ~~$144,000~~$3.6 million transferred to non-accrual loans, $737,000 transferred to OREO, and $207,000 of ~~charge-offs and $526,000 of loans moved to repossessed assets.~~ charge-offs.

We had ~~no other real estate owned~~$18.8 million of OREO at September 30, ~~2017~~2023 and ~~$104,000~~$21.2 million of OREO at December 31, ~~2016 with no additional activity during~~2022. The change in balance reflected $737,000 transferred from loans past due 90 days or more still accruing interest, $2.0 million of sales and $1.2 million of charge-offs. The balance at both dates included $15 million for a Florida mall property, for which a developer, who is working to develop the ~~intervening period.~~property, has made a deposit. The property was reappraised in May 2023 and the appraised value continues to exceed the $15 million carrying value.

~~The following table classifies our~~

We evaluate loans ~~(not including loans held for sale) by categories which are used throughout the industry~~under an internal loan risk rating system as a means of identifying problem loans. At September 30, ~~2017~~2023 and December 31, ~~2016:~~2022, classified loans were segregated by year of origination and are shown in “Note 6. Loans” to the unaudited consolidated financial statements herein.

* ~~For information on targeted loan review thresholds see “Allowance for Loan Losses”.~~

Premises and ~~equipment, net.~~ Equipment, Net

Premises and equipment amounted to ~~$21.1~~$29.0 million at September 30, ~~2017~~2023, compared to ~~$24.1~~$18.4 million at December 31, ~~2016.~~2022. The ~~decrease~~increase reflected ~~depreciation~~the acquisition of equipment for a new data center and ~~reduced purchases compared to prior periods.~~

~~Investment in Unconsolidated Entity. On December 30, 2014,~~ the ~~Bank entered into an agreement for, and closed on, the sale of a portion of its commercial loan portfolio. The purchaser~~buildout of the ~~loan portfolio was a~~ newly ~~formed entity, Walnut Street 2014-1 Issuer, LLC (“Walnut Street”). The price paid to the Bank~~leased space for the loan portfolio, which had a face value of approximately $267.6 million, was approximately $209.6 million, of which approximately $193.6 million was in the form of two notes issued by Walnut Street to the Bank; a senior note in the principal amount of approximately $178.2 million bearing interest at 1.5% per year and maturing in December 2024 and a subordinate note in the principal amount of approximately $15.4 million, bearing interest at 10.0% per year and maturing in December 2024. The balance of these notes comprise the $107.7 million investment in unconsolidated entity at September 30, 2017.

~~Assets held for sale.~~ ~~Assets held for sale as a result of discontinued operations, primarily commercial, commercial mortgage and construction loans,~~Other assets

Other assets amounted to ~~$315.0~~$127.1 million at September 30, ~~2017~~2023 compared to ~~$360.7~~$89.2 million at December 31, ~~2016.~~2022. The ~~decrease resulted primarily~~higher balance reflected a $14.8 million loan payoff, made prior to quarter end, for which the funds were received from the loan ~~repayments.~~servicer after quarter-end.

Deposits.

Our primary source of funding is deposit acquisition. We offer a variety of deposit accounts with a range of interest rates and terms, including demand, checking and money market accounts. ~~However, the~~The majority of our deposits are generated through prepaid and debit card and other payments related ~~deposits.~~deposit accounts. One of our strategic ~~focus~~focuses is growing these accounts through affinity groups. At September

30, ~~2017,~~2023, we had total deposits of ~~$3.57~~$6.50 billion compared to ~~$4.24~~$7.03 billion at December 31, ~~2016,~~2022, a decrease of ~~$672.9~~$525.6 million, or ~~15.9%~~7.5%. The change primarily reflected a $330.0 million decrease ~~reflected~~in short-term time deposits which matured in the ~~planned exit~~first quarter of ~~higher cost deposit relationships which did not have adequate income components.~~ 2023.

The following table presents the average balance and rates paid on deposits for the periods indicated ~~(in~~(dollars in thousands):

For the nine months ended

For the year ended

September 30, 2017

December 31, 2016

Average

Average

Average

Average

balance

rate

balance

rate

Demand and interest checking *

$              3,433,027

0.34%

$              3,347,191

0.28%
Savings and money market

434,768

0.53%

394,434

0.39%
Time

-

0.00%

77,576

0.58%

Total deposits

$              3,867,795

0.36%

$              3,819,201

0.30%



	For the nine months ended			For the year ended
	September 30, 2023			December 31, 2022
	Average		Average	Average		Average
	balance		rate	balance		rate

Demand and interest checking⁽¹⁾	$	6,343,711	2.25%	$	5,670,818	0.70%
Savings and money market		88,738	3.70%		510,370	1.67%
Time		27,802	4.11%		86,907	3.15%
Total deposits	$	6,460,251	2.28%	$	6,268,095	0.82%

* ⁽¹⁾Non-interest bearing demand accounts are not paid interest. The amount shown as interest reflects the fees paid to affinity groups, which are based upon a rate index, and therefore classified as interest expense.

Short-term Borrowings.

Short-term borrowings consist of amounts borrowed on our lines of credit with the Federal Reserve Bank or FHLB. There were no borrowings on either line at September 30, 2023 or December 31, 2022. We generally utilize overnight borrowings to manage our daily reserve requirements at the Federal Reserve. Period-end and year-to-date information for the dates shown is as follows.


	September 30,		December 31,
	2023		2022
		(Dollars in thousands)
Short-term borrowings
Balance at period end	$	—	$	—
Average for the three months ended September 30, 2023		—		N/A
Average during the year		6,758		60,312
Maximum month-end balance		450,000		495,000
Weighted average rate during the period		4.62%		2.55%
Rate at period end		—		—

Senior Debt

On August 13, 2020, we issued $100.0 million of the 2025 Senior Notes, with a maturity date of August 15, 2025, and a 4.75% interest rate, with interest paid semi-annually on March 15 and September 15. The 2025 Senior Notes are the Company’s direct, unsecured and unsubordinated obligations and rank equal in priority with all our existing and future unsecured and unsubordinated indebtedness and senior in right of payment to all our existing and future subordinated indebtedness. In lieu of repayment of debt from dividends paid by the Bank to the Company, industry practice includes the issuance of new debt to repay maturing debt.

Borrowings

At September 30, ~~2017,~~2023, we had other long-term borrowings of ~~$42.5~~$9.9 million compared to ~~$263.1~~$10.0 million at December 31, ~~2016.~~2022. The ~~$42.5 million outstanding at September 30, 2017, reflected the proceeds from two~~borrowings consisted of sold loans which were ~~sold in which we retained a participating interest. Long-term borrowings of $263.1 million at December 31, 2016 reflected the proceeds of loans sold into a securitization which, at that date, was~~ accounted for as a secured ~~borrowing. In the first quarter of 2017, the documentation required~~borrowing because they did not qualify for true sale ~~accounting was completed, and the sale was recorded in that quarter.~~accounting. We do not have any policy prohibiting us from incurring debt.

The 2038 Debentures, which total $13.4 million, mature in March 2038 and bear interest at SOFR plus 3.51%, are grandfathered to qualify as tier 1 capital at the Bank.

Other ~~liabilities.~~Liabilities

Other liabilities amounted to ~~$32.7~~$68.5 million at September 30, ~~2017~~2023, compared to ~~$44.1~~$56.3 million at December 31, ~~2016, representing an increase of $11.4 million. Other liabilities consist primarily of investment payables and accrued expenses.~~2022.

~~Off balance~~Off-balance sheet arrangements.

There were no off-balance sheet arrangements during the nine months ended September 30, ~~2017~~2023 that have or are reasonably likely to have, a current or future effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources that is material to our interests.

‎

5868

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

~~Except as discussed~~Information about market risk for the quarter ended September 30, 2023 is included under “Asset and Liability Management” in Part I, Item 2,2. “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of ~~Operations,”~~Operations” of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. Except for such information, there has been no material change into our assessment of our sensitivity to market risk ~~since our presentation~~as discussed in ~~our Annual Report on~~the 2022 Form ~~10-K for~~10-K.

As noted under “Asset and Liability Management,” the ~~year ended December 31, 2016.~~Company’s exposure to interest rate risk is managed through the use of guidelines which limit interest rate exposure to higher interest rates. Because the Company has emphasized variable rate instruments in its loan and investment portfolios, it tends to benefit from higher interest rate environments. As a result of the Federal Reserve rate increases in 2022 and 2023, net interest income has increased and exceeded prior period levels. Future Federal Reserve rate reductions may result in a return to lower net interest income levels. In addition to the aforementioned guidelines which the Company uses to manage interest rate risk, the Company utilizes an asset liability committee to provide oversight by multiple departments and senior officers.

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

We maintain disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act) that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our reports under ~~the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or~~ the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer (our principal executive officer) and our Chief Financial Officer (our principal financial officer), as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. ~~Members~~Because of our operational management and internal audit meet regularly to provide an established structure to report any weaknesses or other issues with controls, or any matter that has not been reported previously, to our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, and, in turn to the Audit Committee of our Board of Directors. In designing and evaluating theinherent limitations, disclosure ~~controls and procedures, our management recognized that any~~ controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable, and not absolute, assurance that the objectives of ~~achieving the desired control objectives, and our management necessarily was required to apply its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible~~disclosure controls and ~~procedures.~~procedures are met.

Under the supervision of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, ~~we have~~our management carried out an evaluation of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based upon that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures ~~are~~were effective at ~~the~~a reasonable level of assurance ~~level.~~as of September 30, 2023.

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

There ~~has been~~were no ~~change~~changes in our internal control over financial reporting ~~that occurred~~(as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) during the quarter ended September 30, ~~2017~~2023 that ~~has~~have materially affected, or isare reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial ~~reporting~~. reporting.

PART II – OTHER ~~INFORMATION~~INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

For a discussion of ~~certain regulatory~~our material pending legal proceedings, ~~involving~~see “Note 14. Legal” to the ~~FDIC and FRB, see Part I, Item 2 “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations-Financial Statement Restatement; Regulatory Actions”.~~

~~The Company received a subpoena from the SEC, dated March 22, 2016, relating to an investigation by the SEC of the Company's restatement of its~~unaudited consolidated financial statements for the years ended December 31, 2010 through December 31, 2013 and the interim periods ended March 31, 2014, September 30, 2014 and September 30, 2014, which restatement was filed with the SEC on September 28, 2015, and the facts and circumstances underlying the restatement. The Company is cooperating fully with the SEC's investigation. The costs to respond to the subpoena and cooperate with the SEC's investigation have been material, and we expect such costs to continue to be material at least through the completion of the SEC’s investigation.

On September 30, 2016, the Company received written notice from the Internal Revenue Service that it will be conducting an audit of the Company's tax returns for the tax years 2012, 2013 and 2014. The audit is in ~~process.~~

The Company received a letter, dated August 1, 2016, demanding inspection of its books and records pursuant to Section 220 of the Delaware General Corporation Law, or DCGL, from legal counsel representing a shareholder (the "Demand Letter"). The Company, through outside legal counsel, responded to the Demand Letter by permitting the shareholder to inspect certain of the Company’s books and records and by objecting to other requests. On January 30, 2017, the shareholder filed a complaint in the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware seeking an order from the court, pursuant to Section 220 of the DGCL, compelling the Company to permit the shareholder to inspect additional books and records of the Company. The Company believes that its original response to the Demand Letter was appropriate in all respects and continues to defend against the complaint. On July 27, 2017, the Court of Chancery ruled in favor of the Company and granted an Order of Final Judgment Denying Plaintiff’s Demand To Inspect The Books And Records of Defendant. The court’s Order was subject to an appeal right which has now expired; no appeal was filed. Both the Demand Letter and the complaint threaten the commencement of a shareholder’s derivative suit against certain officers and directors of the Company seeking damages and other remedies on behalf of the Company. We have been advised by our counsel in the matter that reasonably possible losses cannot be estimated, but we and our counsel continue to believe the claim is without merit.

On October 17, 2017, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (the “FDIC”) informed The Bancorp Bank (the “Bank”), a wholly owned subsidiary of The Bancorp, Inc. (the “Company”), that it intends to pursue an Order For Restitution (“Restitution Order”) and Order to Pay Civil Money Penalty (“CMP Order”) in an amount up to $2,576,000. The FDIC’s action principally emanates from one of the Bank’s third-party payment processors (“Third Party Processor”) suffering an internal system programming glitch. This inadvertently resulted in consumers that engaged in signature-based point of sale transactions during the period from December 2010 to November 2014 being charged a greater fee than what was disclosed by the Bank. Impacted consumers are being reimbursed by the Third Party Processor at its own expense. The Restitution Order would require the Bank to make such reimbursements if not otherwise made by the Third Party Processor, however, the Bank is indemnified by the Third Party Processor for such reimbursements. Although the Bank is still evaluating its position with regard to the Restitution Order and the CMP Order, the Company accrued $2,500,000 of related expense in its financial statements for the quarter ended September 30, 2017 in connection with the CMP Order. Any amounts owed from the CMP Order would not be subject to any indemnification or recovery from any third party.

~~Item 6.~~ ~~Exhibits~~

~~The Exhibits furnished as part of~~ this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, ~~are identified in the Exhibit Index immediately following the signature page of this Report. Such Exhibit Index~~which is incorporated herein by reference.

Item 1A. Risk Factors

Our business, financial condition, operating results and cash flows are subject to various risks and uncertainties, including those described in Part I, Item 1A. “Risk Factors” in the 2022 Form 10-K and additionally by the following risk factor.

Recent developments in the banking industry related to specific problem banks could have a negative impact on the industry as a whole and may negatively impact stock prices and result in additional regulations that could increase our expenses and otherwise affect our operations.

Recent high-profile bank failures have generated market volatility among publicly traded bank holding companies, unrelated to the Company, and industry commentary through social media and other outlets has negatively impacted confidence in depository institutions and created uncertainty with respect to the health of the U.S. banking system. If such levels of financial market volatility continue, or if rumored or actual events occur which further erode the actual or perceived stability of the banking system and financial markets, this could trigger additional regulatory scrutiny, increased FDIC insurance premiums or assessments, and new or amended regulations which may adversely affect the Company. While the underlying causes of these recent market events are not apparent within the Company or the Bank, these recent events and regulatory agency responses, including increased FDIC insurance premiums or assessments, could have a material impact on our business.

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

Stock Repurchases

The following table sets forth information regarding the Company’s repurchases of its common stock during the quarter ended September 30, 2023:


Period	Total number of shares purchased	Average price paid per share		Total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs⁽¹⁾	Approximate dollar value of shares that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs⁽²⁾
	(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
July 1, 2023 - July 31, 2023	272,227	$	36.21	272,227	$	40,143
August 1, 2023 - August 31, 2023	245,200		37.32	245,200		30,992
September 1, 2023 - September 30, 2023	168,051		35.66	168,051		25,000
Total	685,478		36.47	685,478		25,000

⁽¹⁾During the third quarter of 2023, all shares of common stock were repurchased pursuant to the 2023 Repurchase Program, which was approved by the Board on October 26, 2022 and publicly announced on October 27, 2022. Under the 2023 Repurchase Program, the Company is authorized to repurchase shares of its common stock totaling up to $25.0 million per quarter, for a maximum amount of $100.0 million in 2023. The Company may repurchase shares through open market purchases, including through written trading plans under Rule 10b5-1 under the Exchange Act, privately-negotiated transactions, block purchases or otherwise in accordance with applicable federal securities laws, including Rule 10b-18 under the Exchange Act.

⁽²⁾The 2023 Repurchase Program may be suspended, amended or discontinued at any time and has an expiration date of December 31, 2023. With respect to further repurchases, the Company cannot predict if, or when, it will repurchase any shares of common stock, and the timing and amount of any shares repurchased will be determined by management based on its evaluation of market conditions and other factors.

‎

Item 6. Exhibits


Exhibit No.		Description

~~31.1~~
3.1.1		Certificate of Incorporation filed July 20, 1999, amended July 27, 1999, amended June 7, 2001, and amended October 8, 2002 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-4 filed July 15, 2004)

3.1.2		Amendment to Certificate of Incorporation filed July 30, 2009(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed November 9, 2016)

3.1.3		Amendment to Certificate of Incorporation filed May 18, 2016 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.3 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed November 9, 2016)

3.2		Amended and Restated Bylaws(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed March 16, 2017)

31.1		Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certifications *

31.2		Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certifications *

32.1		Section 1350 Certifications *

32.2		Section 1350 Certifications *

101.INS		Inline XBRL Instance Document **

101.SCH		Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document *

101.CAL		Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document *

101.DEF		Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document *

101.LAB		Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document *

101.PRE		Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document *
104		Cover Page Interactive Data File (formatted as Inline XBRL and contained in Exhibit 101)*
*		~~Filed herewith~~
*		Filed herewith
**		The Instance Document does not appear in the Interactive Data File because its XBRL tags are embedded within the Inline XBRL document.

‎

~~SIGNATURES~~

SIGNATURES

~~Pursuant~~

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

10
		~~THE BANCORP INC~~
		~~(Registrant)~~THE BANCORP, INC.
		(Registrant)
~~November 9, 2017~~		~~/s/ DAMIAN KOZLOWSKI~~
~~Date~~November 9, 2023		~~Damian Kozlowski~~/S/ DAMIAN KOZLOWSKI
Date		~~President/Chief Executive Officer~~Damian Kozlowski
		Chief Executive Officer
~~November 9, 2017~~		~~/s/ PAUL FRENKIEL~~
~~Date~~November 9, 2023		~~Paul Frenkiel~~ ~~Executive Vice President of Strategy,~~/S/ PAUL FRENKIEL
Date		Paul Frenkiel Chief Financial Officer and Secretary

Other	3,574	4,276	10,306	14,127
Total non-interest expense	43,883	44,171	119,029	156,445
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes	12,225	(1,475)	30,213	(45,135)
Income tax expense (benefit)	5,455	55	(457)	(15,324)
Net income (loss) from continuing operations	$ 6,770	$ (1,530)	$ 30,670	$ (29,811)
Discontinued operations
Income (loss) from discontinued operations before income taxes	829	(21,490)	5,488	(38,073)
Income tax expense (benefit)	318	2,531	2,050	(164)
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax	511	(24,021)	3,438	(37,909)
Net income (loss) available to common shareholders	$ 7,281	$ (25,551)	$ 34,108	$ (67,720)

Net income (loss) per share from continuing operations - basic	$ 0.12	$ (0.03)	$ 0.55	$ (0.73)
Net income (loss) per share from discontinued operations - basic	$ 0.01	$ (0.51)	$ 0.06	$ (0.92)
Net income (loss) per share - basic	$ 0.13	$ (0.54)	$ 0.61	$ (1.65)

Net income (loss) per share from continuing operations - diluted	$ 0.12	$ (0.03)	$ 0.55	$ (0.73)
Net income (loss) per share from discontinued operations - diluted	$ 0.01	$ (0.51)	$ 0.06	$ (0.92)
Net income (loss) per share - diluted	$ 0.13	$ (0.54)	$ 0.61	$ (1.65)



	For the three months ended
	September 30, 2016
	Income	Shares	Per share
	(numerator)	(denominator)	amount

	(dollars in thousands except share and per share data)
Basic loss per share from continuing operations
Net loss available to common shareholders	$ (1,530)	47,153,658	$ (0.03)
Effect of dilutive securities
Common stock options	-	-	-
Diluted loss per share
Net loss available to common shareholders	$ (1,530)	47,153,658	$ (0.03)



Single issuer	Book value	Fair value	Unrealized gain/(loss)	Credit rating
Security A	$ 1,913	$ 2,031	$ 118	Not rated
Security B	9,104	6,343	(2,761)	Not rated

Class: All of the above are trust preferred securities.



	Recorded investment	Unpaid principal balance	Related allowance	Average recorded investment	Interest income recognized
September 30, 2017
Without an allowance recorded
SBA non real estate	$ 357	$ 357	$ -	$ 274	$ -
SBA commercial mortgage	-	-	-	-	-
Direct lease financing	284	396	-	71	-
Consumer - other	-	-	-	-	-
Consumer - home equity	1,700	1,700	-	1,716	-
With an allowance recorded					-
SBA non real estate	2,288	2,288	1,659	2,534	-
SBA commercial mortgage	1,226	1,226	185	761	-
Direct lease financing	-	-	-	506	-
Consumer - other	-	-	-	18	-
Consumer - home equity	-	-	-	-	-
Total
SBA non real estate	2,645	2,645	1,659	2,808	-



	SBA non real estate	SBA commercial mortgage	SBA construction	Direct lease financing	SBLOC	Other specialty lending	Other consumer loans	Unallocated	Total
September 30, 2017
Beginning balance	$ 1,976	$ 737	$ 76	$ 1,994	$ 315	$ 32	$ 975	$ 227	$ 6,332
Charge-offs	(343)	-	-	(780)	-	-	(113)	-	(1,236)
Recoveries	13	-	-	-	-	-	24	-	37
Provision (credit)	1,576	521	22	196	45	36	(220)	(26)	2,150
Ending balance	$ 3,222	$ 1,258	$ 98	$ 1,410	$ 360	$ 68	$ 666	$ 201	$ 7,283

Ending balance: Individually evaluated for impairment	$ 1,659	$ 185	$ -	$ -	$ -	$ -	$ -	$ -	$ 1,844

Ending balance: Collectively evaluated for impairment	$ 1,563	$ 1,073	$ 98	$ 1,410	$ 360	$ 68	$ 666	$ 201	$ 5,439

Loans:
Ending balance	$ 72,055	$ 132,997	$ 14,205	$ 369,069	$ 720,279	$ 36,664	$ 20,107	$ 8,684	$ 1,374,060

Ending balance: Individually evaluated for impairment	$ 2,645	$ 1,226	$ -	$ 284	$ -	$ -	$ 1,700	$ -	$ 5,855

Ending balance: Collectively evaluated for impairment	$ 69,410	$ 131,771	$ 14,205	$ 368,785	$ 720,279	$ 36,664	$ 18,407	$ 8,684	$ 1,368,205



December 31, 2016
Beginning balance	$ 844	$ 408	$ 48	$ 1,022	$ 762	$ 199	$ 936	$ 181	$ 4,400
Charge-offs	(128)	-	-	(119)	-	-	(1,211)	-	(1,458)
Recoveries	1	-	-	17			12	-	30
Provision (credit)	1,259	329	28	1,074	(447)	(167)	1,238	46	3,360
Ending balance	$ 1,976	$ 737	$ 76	$ 1,994	$ 315	$ 32	$ 975	$ 227	$ 6,332

Ending balance: Individually evaluated for impairment	$ 938	$ -	$ -	$ 216	$ -	$ -	$ -	$ -	$ 1,154

Ending balance: Collectively evaluated for impairment	$ 1,038	$ 737	$ 76	$ 1,778	$ 315	$ 32	$ 975	$ 227	$ 5,178

Loans:
Ending balance	$ 74,644	$ 126,159	$ 8,826	$ 346,645	$ 630,400	$ 11,073	$ 17,374	$ 7,790	$ 1,222,911

Ending balance: Individually evaluated for impairment	$ 2,374	$ -	$ -	$ 734	$ -	$ -	$ 1,730	$ -	$ 4,838

Ending balance: Collectively evaluated for impairment	$ 72,270	$ 126,159	$ 8,826	$ 345,911	$ 630,400	$ 11,073	$ 15,644	$ 7,790	$ 1,218,073



	30-59 Days	60-89 Days	90 Days		Total		Total
September 30, 2017	past due	past due	or greater	Non-accrual	past due	Current	loans
SBA non real estate	$ 272	$ 165	$ -	$ 2,310	$ 2,747	$ 69,308	$ 72,055
SBA commercial mortgage	-	-	-	1,226	1,226	131,771	132,997
SBA construction	-	-	-	-	-	14,205	14,205
Direct lease financing	5,065	1,060	354	-	6,479	362,590	369,069
SBLOC	-	-	-	-	-	720,279	720,279
Other specialty lending	-	-	-	-	-	36,664	36,664
Consumer - other	-	-	-	-	-	9,585	9,585
Consumer - home equity	144	-	-	1,417	1,561	8,961	10,522
Unamortized loan fees and costs	-	-	-	-	-	8,684	8,684
	$ 5,481	$ 1,225	$ 354	$ 4,953	$ 12,013	$ 1,362,047	$ 1,374,060



	As of or
	for the nine months ended
	September 30,
	2017	2016

Ratio of the allowance for loan losses to total loans	0.53%	0.51%
Ratio of the allowance for loan losses to nonperforming loans *	137.23%	87.12%
Ratio of nonperforming assets to total assets *	0.13%	0.16%
Ratio of net charge-offs to average loans	0.07%	0.01%
Ratio of net charge-offs to average loans annualized	0.09%	0.01%

* Includes loans 90 days past due still accruing interest.