Page

Commonly Used Defined Terms

2

PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1.

Financial Statements

Consolidated Balance Sheets

3

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PART II – OTHER INFORMATION

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

______________________

FORM 10-Q

Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the
‎Securities Exchange Act of 1934

For the Quarterly Period Ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017~~2020

Commission File Number 001-32924

Green Plains Inc.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)


Iowa	84-1652107
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)	(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

1811 Aksarben Drive, Omaha, NE 68106	(402) 884-8700
(Address of principal executive offices, including zip code)	(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:


Title of each class	Trading Symbol	Name of each exchange on which registered
Common Stock, par value $0.001 per share	GPRE	The Nasdaq Stock Market LLC

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

☒x Yes ☐o No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically ~~and posted on its corporate Web site, if any,~~ every Interactive Data File required to be submitted ~~and posted~~ pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit ~~and post~~ such files).

☒

x Yes ☐o No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.


Large accelerated filer ☐ o	Accelerated filer ☒x

Non-accelerated filer ~~☐ (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)~~o

Smaller reporting company ☐o	Emerging growth company ☐o

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

☐o Yes ☒x No

The number of shares of common stock, par value $0.001 per share, outstanding as of ~~October 27, 2017,~~ July 30, 2020, was ~~41,162,204~~35,653,366 shares.

Table of Contents

Commonly Used Defined Terms

The abbreviations, acronyms and industry terminology used in this quarterly report are defined as follows:

Green Plains Inc., Subsidiaries, and ~~Subsidiaries:~~Partners:


Green Plains; the company	Green Plains Inc. and its subsidiaries
BioProcess Algae	BioProcess Algae LLC
~~Fleischmann’s Vinegar~~Green Plains Cattle; GPCC	~~Fleischmann’s Vinegar Company, Inc.~~
~~Green Plains Cattle~~	Green Plains Cattle Company LLC
Green Plains Grain	Green Plains Grain Company LLC
Green Plains Partners; the partnership	Green Plains Partners LP
~~Green Plains Processing~~	~~Green Plains Processing LLC and its subsidiaries~~
Green Plains Trade	Green Plains Trade Group LLC

Accounting Defined Terms:


ASC	Accounting Standards Codification
EBITDA	Earnings before interest, income taxes, depreciation and amortization
EPS	Earnings per share
Exchange Act	Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended
GAAP	U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles
LIBOR	London Interbank Offered Rate
LTIP	Long-Term Incentive Plan
R&D Credits	Research and development tax credits
~~LTIP~~SEC	~~Green Plains Partners LP 2015 Long-Term Incentive Plan~~
~~SEC~~	Securities and Exchange Commission

Industry and Other Defined Terms:


~~VIE~~Bgy	~~Variable interest entity~~

~~Industry Defined Terms:~~

	Billion gallons per year
CAFE	Corporate Average Fuel Economy
~~E15~~the CARES Act	Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act
COVID-19	Coronavirus Disease 2019
D.C.	District of Columbia
E10	Gasoline blended with up to 10% ethanol by volume
E15	Gasoline blended with up to 15% ethanol by volume
E85	Gasoline blended with up to 85% ethanol by volume
EIA	U.S. Energy Information Administration
~~EISA~~EPA	~~Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007, as amended~~
~~EPA~~	U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
~~MmBTU~~GATT	General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade
MmBtu	Million British Thermal Units
Mmg	Million gallons
~~Mmgy~~MTBE	~~Million gallons per year~~Methyl tertiary-butyl ether
~~RFS II~~MVC	Minimum volume commitment
RFS II	Renewable Fuels Standard II
~~RVO~~RIN	Renewable ~~volume obligations~~identification number
~~U.S.~~RVO	Renewable volume obligation
SRE	Small refinery exemption
U.S.	United States
USDA	U.S. Department of Agriculture
WTO	World Trade Organization

‎

Table of Contents

PART I1 – FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial ~~Statements~~Statements.

GREEN PLAINS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(in thousands, except share amounts)


	September 30, 2017		December 31, 2016		June 30, ‎2020		December 31, ‎2019
	(unaudited)				(unaudited)
ASSETS	ASSETS				ASSETS
Current assets
Cash and cash equivalents	$	261,588	$	304,211	$	163,362	$	245,977
Restricted cash		30,773		51,979		20,234		23,919
Accounts receivable, net of allowances of $234 and $266, respectively		114,978		147,495
Accounts receivable, net of allowances of $218 and $166, respectively						67,185		107,183
Income taxes receivable		14,145		10,379		57,714		6,216
Inventories		612,447		422,181		173,121		252,992
Prepaid expenses and other		14,895		17,095		15,465		13,685
Derivative financial instruments		51,563		47,236		18,974		17,941
Total current assets		1,100,389		1,000,576		516,055		667,913
Property and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation of $489,349 and $417,993, respectively		1,188,270		1,178,706
Goodwill		182,879		183,696
Property and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation ‎and amortization of $523,459 and $486,677, respectively						850,369		827,271
Operating lease right-of-use assets						50,408		52,476
Investment in equity method investees						113,763		68,998
Other assets		156,999		143,514		40,480		81,560
Total assets	$	2,628,537	$	2,506,492	$	1,571,075	$	1,698,218

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY	LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY				LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
Current liabilities
Accounts payable	$	174,788	$	192,275	$	93,566	$	156,693
Accrued and other liabilities		48,500		67,473		32,231		39,384
Derivative financial instruments		12,004		8,916		15,459		8,721
Operating lease current liabilities						14,684		16,626
Short-term notes payable and other borrowings		457,764		291,223		131,425		187,812
Current maturities of long-term debt		6,486		35,059		36,647		132,555
Total current liabilities		699,542		594,946		324,012		541,791
Long-term debt		829,923		782,610		341,219		243,990
Deferred income taxes		48,787		140,262
Operating lease long-term liabilities						38,865		38,314
Other liabilities		35,892		9,483		9,709		8,837
Total liabilities		1,614,144		1,527,301		713,805		832,932

Commitments and contingencies (Note 13)
Commitments and contingencies (Note 14)

Stockholders' equity
Common stock, $0.001 par value; 75,000,000 shares authorized; 46,430,449 and 46,079,108 shares issued, and 41,163,335 and 38,364,118 shares outstanding, respectively		46		46
Common stock, $0.001 par value; 75,000,000 shares authorized; ‎47,466,527 and 46,964,115 shares issued, and 35,653,366 ‎and 36,031,933 shares outstanding, respectively						47		47
Additional paid-in capital		682,073		659,200		736,688		734,580
Retained earnings		283,592		283,214		123,491		148,150
Accumulated other comprehensive loss		(13,607)		(4,137)
Treasury stock, 5,267,114 and 7,714,990 shares, respectively		(54,193)		(75,816)
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)						12,840		(11,064)
Treasury stock, 11,813,161 and 10,932,182 shares, respectively						(131,287)		(119,808)
Total Green Plains stockholders' equity		897,911		862,507		741,779		751,905
Noncontrolling interests		116,482		116,684		115,491		113,381
Total stockholders' equity		1,014,393		979,191		857,270		865,286
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity	$	2,628,537	$	2,506,492	$	1,571,075	$	1,698,218

See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.
‎

GREEN PLAINS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(unaudited and in thousands, except per share amounts)



	Three Months Ended September 30,				Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2017		2016		2017		2016		Three Months Ended ‎June 30,				Six Months Ended ‎June 30,
									2020		2019		2020		2019
Revenues
Product revenues	$	899,534	$	839,786	$	2,670,458	$	2,472,741	$	416,605	$	628,878	$	1,048,186	$	1,065,214
Service revenues		1,701		2,066		4,724		6,042		1,384		1,692		2,672		3,997
Total revenues		901,235		841,852		2,675,182		2,478,783		417,989		630,570		1,050,858		1,069,211

Costs and expenses
Cost of goods sold		815,787		758,883		2,457,702		2,293,094
Cost of goods sold (excluding depreciation and amortization expenses reflected below)										390,861		633,960		1,008,089		1,068,351
Operations and maintenance expenses		8,309		8,564		25,107		25,713		6,603		6,234		12,763		13,098
Selling, general and administrative expenses		28,589		24,264		77,946		68,226		20,518		19,510		42,156		37,910
Goodwill impairment										-		-		24,091		-
Depreciation and amortization expenses		27,834		19,286		80,105		56,132		19,375		17,511		37,455		35,135
Total costs and expenses		880,519		810,997		2,640,860		2,443,165		437,357		677,215		1,124,554		1,154,494
Operating income		20,716		30,855		34,322		35,618
Operating loss from continuing operations										(19,368)		(46,645)		(73,696)		(85,283)

Other income (expense)
Interest income		383		484		1,061		1,263		47		860		640		2,046
Interest expense		(31,889)		(11,819)		(69,815)		(33,117)		(9,670)		(11,249)		(19,367)		(20,980)
Other, net		1,444		(1,553)		2,811		(2,050)		14		(370)		850		542
Total other expense		(30,062)		(12,888)		(65,943)		(33,904)		(9,609)		(10,759)		(17,877)		(18,392)
Income (loss) before income taxes		(9,346)		17,967		(31,621)		1,714
Income tax expense (benefit)		(48,775)		5,083		(60,905)		(4,339)
Net income		39,429		12,884		29,284		6,053
Loss from continuing operations before income taxes and income (loss) from equity method investees										(28,977)		(57,404)		(91,573)		(103,675)
Income tax benefit										11,458		15,322		55,741		28,265
Income (loss) from equity method investees, net of income taxes										12,045		(36)		20,011		(110)
Net loss from continuing operations including noncontrolling interest										(5,474)		(42,118)		(15,821)		(75,520)
Net income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of income taxes										-		1,939		-		(2,530)
Net loss										(5,474)		(40,179)		(15,821)		(78,050)
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests		5,035		4,956		14,853		14,072		2,740		5,163		8,838		10,091
Net income (loss) attributable to Green Plains	$	34,394	$	7,928	$	14,431	$	(8,019)
Net loss attributable to Green Plains									$	(8,214)	$	(45,342)	$	(24,659)	$	(88,141)

Earnings per share:
Net income (loss) attributable to Green Plains - basic	$	0.83	$	0.21	$	0.36	$	(0.21)
Net income (loss) attributable to Green Plains - diluted	$	0.74	$	0.20	$	0.48	$	(0.21)
Earnings per share - basic and diluted
Net loss from continuing operations									$	(0.24)	$	(1.18)	$	(0.71)	$	(2.13)
Net income (loss) from discontinued operations										-		0.05		-		(0.06)
Net loss attributable to Green Plains									$	(0.24)	$	(1.13)	$	(0.71)	$	(2.19)

Weighted average shares outstanding:
Basic		41,348		38,282		40,008		38,301		34,603		40,081		34,634		40,200
Diluted		50,647		39,136		50,693		38,301		34,603		40,081		34,634		40,200

Cash dividend declared per share	$	0.12	$	0.12	$	0.36	$	0.36

Table of Contents

GREEN PLAINS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME ~~(LOSS)~~

(unaudited and in thousands)

Three Months Ended
September 30,

Nine Months Ended
September 30,

2017

2016

2017

2016

Net income
$
39,429

$
12,884

$
29,284

$
6,053
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax:

Unrealized gains (losses) on derivatives arising during period,
net of tax (expense) benefit of $4,575, $(1,331), $5,633
and $762, respectively

(7,660)

1,919

(9,436)

(1,395)
Reclassification of realized (gains) losses on derivatives, net
of tax expense (benefit) of $(2,650), $(1,144), $21
and $(1,369), respectively

4,453

2,150

(34)

2,506
Total other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax

(3,207)

4,069

(9,470)

1,111
Comprehensive income

36,222

16,953

19,814

7,164
Comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interests

5,035

4,956

14,853

14,072
Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to Green Plains
$
31,187

$
11,997

$
4,961

$
(6,908)


	Three Months Ended ‎June 30,				Six Months Ended ‎June 30,
	2020		2019		2020		2019
Net loss	$	(5,474)	$	(40,179)	$	(15,821)	$	(78,050)
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax:
Unrealized gains (losses) on derivatives arising during the period, net of tax benefit (expense) of $428, ($9,884), ($1,019) and ($7,804), respectively		(1,333)		33,260		3,199		26,377
Reclassification of realized losses (gains) on derivatives, net of tax expense (benefit) of $1, ($947), $1,431 and ($4,087), respectively		(7)		3,440		(4,492)		13,816
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax		(1,340)		36,700		(1,293)		40,193
Share of equity method investees other comprehensive income arising during the period, net of tax benefit (expense) of $5,336, $0, ($8,023) and $0, respectively		(16,759)		-		25,197		-
Total other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax		(18,099)		36,700		23,904		40,193
Comprehensive income (loss)		(23,573)		(3,479)		8,083		(37,857)
Comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interests		2,740		5,163		8,838		10,091
Comprehensive loss attributable to Green Plains	$	(26,313)	$	(8,642)	$	(755)	$	(47,948)

See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.

‎

Table of Contents

GREEN PLAINS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(unaudited and in thousands)

Nine Months Ended
September 30,

2017

2016
Cash flows from operating activities:

Net income
$
29,284

$
6,053
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided (used) by operating activities:

Depreciation and amortization

80,105

56,132
Amortization of debt issuance costs and debt discount

11,222

7,588
Loss on exchange of 3.25% convertible notes due 2018

1,291

-
Gain on disposal of assets

(2,439)

-
Write-off of deferred financing fees related to extinguishment of debt

9,460

-
Deferred income taxes

(88,565)

(16,413)
Other noncurrent assets and liabilities

18,062

-
Stock-based compensation

8,761

7,043
Undistributed equity in loss of affiliates

120

2,067
Other

-

57
Changes in operating assets and liabilities before effects of business combinations:

Accounts receivable

32,267

(36,431)
Inventories

(168,788)

46,126
Derivative financial instruments

(16,430)

6,279
Prepaid expenses and other assets

2,180

(849)
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities

(34,278)

(23,704)
Current income taxes

(1,540)

8,089
Other

1,361

1,150
Change in restricted cash

(4,289)

-
Net cash provided (used) by operating activities

(122,216)

63,187

Cash flows from investing activities:

Purchases of property and equipment, net

(36,475)

(35,658)
Acquisition of a business, net of cash acquired

(61,727)

(252,488)
Investments in unconsolidated subsidiaries

(12,033)

(1,388)
Net cash used by investing activities

(110,235)

(289,534)

Cash flows from financing activities:

Proceeds from the issuance of long-term debt

551,500

337,000
Payments of principal on long-term debt

(487,450)

(40,578)
Proceeds from short-term borrowings

3,301,630

2,969,034
Payments on short-term borrowings

(3,135,347)

(2,967,191)
Cash payment for exchange of 3.25% convertible notes due 2018

(8,523)

-
Payments for repurchase of common stock

(5,733)

(6,005)
Payments of cash dividends and distributions

(29,267)

(27,837)
Payment penalty on early extinguishment of debt

(2,881)

-
Change in restricted cash

25,495

(7,200)
Payments of loan fees

(15,541)

(7,810)
Payments related to tax withholdings for stock-based compensation

(4,105)

(2,206)
Proceeds from exercise of stock options

50

1,632
Net cash provided by financing activities

189,828

248,839

Net change in cash and cash equivalents

(42,623)

22,492
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period

304,211

384,867
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period
$
261,588

$
407,359


~~Continued on the following page~~


	Six Months Ended ‎June 30,
	2020		2019
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net loss from continuing operations including noncontrolling interest	$	(15,821)	$	(75,520)
Net loss from discontinued operations, net of income taxes		-		(2,530)
Net loss		(15,821)		(78,050)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization		37,455		35,135
Amortization of debt issuance costs and debt discount		10,373		9,691
Goodwill impairment		24,091		-
Deferred income taxes		(18,132)		(27,543)
Stock-based compensation		3,555		4,809
Loss (income) from equity method investees, net of income taxes		(20,011)		110
Distribution from equity method investment		14,326		-
Other		(8)		1,327
Changes in operating assets and liabilities before effects of business combinations and dispositions:
Accounts receivable		39,960		(9,971)
Inventories		79,841		80,681
Derivative financial instruments		4,000		3,244
Prepaid expenses and other assets		1,220		2,893
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities		(65,276)		(62,651)
Current income taxes		(26,610)		(2,137)
Other		(3,026)		(612)
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities - continuing operations		65,937		(43,074)
Net cash provided by operating activities - discontinued operations		-		10,865
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities		65,937		(32,209)

Cash flows from investing activities:
Purchases of property and equipment, net		(63,881)		(20,016)
Proceeds from the sale of assets, net		-		3,155
Other investing activities		(4,098)		-
Net cash used in investing activities - continuing operations		(67,979)		(16,861)
Net cash used in investing activities - discontinued operations		-		(3,451)
Net cash used in investing activities		(67,979)		(20,312)

Cash flows from financing activities:
Proceeds from the issuance of long-term debt		3,000		147,700
Payments of principal on long-term debt		(316)		(45,125)
Proceeds from short-term borrowings		1,237,064		1,252,157
Payments on short-term borrowings		(1,301,154)		(1,285,856)
Payments for repurchase of common stock		(11,479)		(39,870)
Payments of cash dividends and distributions		(6,887)		(20,692)
Proceeds from disgorgement of shareholder short-swing profits		-		6,699
Payments of loan fees		(3,198)		(4,892)
Payments related to tax withholdings for stock-based compensation		(1,288)		(2,094)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities - continuing operations		(84,258)		8,027
Net cash used in financing activities - discontinued operations		-		(39,793)
Net cash used in financing activities		(84,258)		(31,766)

Net change in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash		(86,300)		(84,287)
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash, beginning of period		269,896		283,284
Discontinued operations cash activity included above:
Add: Cash balance included in current assets of discontinued operations at beginning of period		-		34,911
Less: Cash balance included in current assets of discontinued operations at end of period		-		(2)
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash, end of period	$	183,596	$	233,906

Continued on the following page

Table of Contents

GREEN PLAINS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(unaudited and in thousands)

Continued from the previous page

Nine Months Ended
September 30,

2017

2016
Non-cash financing activity:

Exchange of 3.25% convertible notes due 2018 for shares of
common stock
$
47,743

$
-
Exchange of common stock held in treasury stock for 3.25%
convertible notes due 2018
$
27,356

$
-

Supplemental disclosures of cash flow:

Cash paid for income taxes
$
2,062

$
3,348
Cash paid for interest
$
39,984

$
24,280

Supplemental investing and financing activities:

Assets acquired in acquisitions and mergers, net of cash
$
62,209

$
257,942
Less: liabilities assumed

(482)

(2,647)
Less: allocation of noncontrolling interest in
consolidation of BioProcess Algae

-

(2,807)
Net assets acquired
$
61,727

$
252,488


Continued from the previous page
	Six Months Ended ‎June 30,
	2020		2019
Reconciliation of total cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	163,362	$	193,280
Restricted cash		20,234		40,628
Discontinued operations cash activity included above:
Less: Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash balance included in current assets of discontinued operations at end of period		-		(2)
Total cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash	$	183,596	$	233,906

Supplemental disclosures of cash flow:
Cash paid (refunded) for income taxes	$	(4,757)	$	564
Cash paid for interest of continuing operations	$	11,217	$	14,269
Cash paid for interest of discontinued operations	$	-	$	8,770

See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.

‎

Table of Contents

GREEN PLAINS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(unaudited)

1. BASIS OF PRESENTATION, DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

References to the Company

References to “Green Plains” or the “company” in the consolidated financial statements and in these notes to the consolidated financial statements refer to Green Plains Inc., an Iowa corporation, and its subsidiaries.

Consolidated Financial Statements

The consolidated financial statements include the company’s accounts and all significant intercompany balances and transactions are eliminated. Unconsolidated entities are included in the financial statements on an equity basis. ~~The~~The company owns a ~~62.5%~~49.0% limited partner interest and a 2.0% general partner interest in Green Plains Partners LP. Public investors own the remaining ~~35.5%~~49.0% limited partner interest in the partnership. The company determined that the limited partners in the partnership with equity at risk lack the power, through voting rights or similar rights, to direct the activities that most significantly impact partnership’s economic performance; therefore, the partnership is considered a ~~VIE.~~variable interest entity. The company, through its ownership of the general partner interest in the partnership, has the power to direct the activities that most significantly affect economic performance and ~~the obligation~~is obligated to absorb losses orand has the right to receive benefits that could be ~~potentially~~ significant to the ~~partnership; therefore,~~partnership. Therefore, the company is considered the primary beneficiary and consolidates the ~~partnership.~~partnership in the company’s financial statements. The assets of the partnership cannot be used by the company for general corporate purposes. The partnership’s consolidated total assets as of ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017~~2020 and December 31, ~~2016~~2019, excluding intercompany balances, are ~~$73.0~~$89.1 million and ~~$75.0~~$90.0 million, respectively, and primarily consist of property and equipment, operating lease right-of-use assets and goodwill. The partnership’s consolidated total liabilities as of ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017~~2020 and December 31, ~~2016~~2019, excluding intercompany balances, are ~~$155.8~~$174.1 million and ~~$156.0~~$180.9 million, respectively, which primarily consist of long-term debt as discussed in Note 89 – ~~Debt.~~Debt and operating lease liabilities. The liabilities recognized as a result of consolidating the partnership do not represent additional claims on our general assets. ~~The partnership~~

GPCC, a previously a wholly owned subsidiary of Green Plains, was disposed of during the third quarter of 2019. After closing, GPCC is no longer consolidated in the company’s consolidated financial statements and the GPCC investment is accounted for using the equity method of accounting. Additionally, the company concluded that the disposition of GPCC met the requirements under ASC 205-20 Presentation of Financial Statements – Discontinued Operations (“ASC 205-20”) to be presented as discontinued operations. As such, GPCC results prior to its disposition are classified as discontinued operations in prior period consolidated financial statements. ~~Effective April 1, 2016, the~~See Note 3 - Dispositions and Discontinued Operations for further details.

The company ~~increased its ownership of~~also owns a 90.0% interest in BioProcess Algae, a joint venture formed in 2008, ~~to 82.8%~~ and ~~consolidated BioProcess Algae~~consolidates their results in its consolidated financial ~~statements beginning on that date.~~statements.

The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with GAAP for interim financial information and the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Because they do not include all of the information and ~~footnotes~~notes required by GAAP, the consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the company’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, ~~2016.~~2019, as filed with the SEC on February 20, 2020.

The unaudited financial information reflects adjustments, which are, in the opinion of management, necessary for a fair presentation of results of operations, financial position and cash flows for the periods presented. The adjustments are normal and recurring in nature, unless otherwise noted. Interim period results are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the entire year.

Reclassifications

Certain prior year amounts relating to the discontinued operations of GPCC were reclassified to conform to the current year presentation. These reclassifications ~~did not affect~~affected certain balance sheet line items, total revenues, costs and ~~expenses, net income or stockholders’ equity.~~expenses.

‎

Table of Contents

Use of Estimates in the Preparation of Consolidated Financial Statements

The preparation of ~~the~~ consolidated financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make certain estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, ~~and~~ disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. The company bases its estimates on historical experience and assumptions it believes are proper and reasonable under the circumstances and regularly evaluates the appropriateness of its estimates and assumptions. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Key accounting policies, including but not limited to those relating to revenue recognition, ~~depreciation of property and equipment,~~operating leases, impairment of long-lived assets and goodwill, derivative financial instruments and accounting for income taxes, are impacted significantly by judgments, assumptions and estimates used in the preparation of the consolidated financial statements.

Description of Business

~~Green Plains is North America’s second largest consolidated owner of ethanol plants.~~ The company operates ~~four~~within 4 business segments: (1) ethanol production, which includes the production of ethanol, including industrial-grade alcohol, distillers grains and corn oil, (2) agribusiness and energy services, which includes grain handling and storage, ~~and~~commodity marketing and merchant trading for company-produced and third-party ethanol, distillers grains, corn oil, natural gas and other commodities, (3) food and ingredients, which includes ~~cattle feedlots, vinegar production and~~ food-grade corn oil ~~operations,~~ and (4) partnership, which includes fuel storage and transportation services.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

Cash and cash equivalents includes bank deposits as well as short-term, highly liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less.

Restricted Cash

The company has restricted cash, which can only be used for funding letters of credit or for payment towards a revolving credit agreement. Restricted cash also includes cash margins and securities pledged to commodity exchange clearinghouses and at times, funds in escrow related to acquisition and disposition activities. To the degree these segregated balances are cash and cash equivalents, they are considered restricted cash on the consolidated balance sheets.

Revenue Recognition

The company recognizes revenue when obligations under the ~~following criteria~~terms of a contract with a customer are ~~satisfied: persuasive evidence that an arrangement exists, title~~satisfied. Generally this occurs with the transfer of ~~product~~control of products or services. Revenue is measured as the amount of consideration expected to be received in exchange for transferring goods or providing services. Sales, value add, and ~~risk of loss~~other taxes the company collects concurrent with revenue-producing activities are ~~transferred to the customer, price is fixed and determinable and collectability is reasonably assured.~~excluded from revenue.

Sales of ethanol, distillers grains, corn oil, natural gas and other commodities by the company’s marketing business are recognized when ~~title~~obligations under the terms of ~~product and risk~~a contract with a customer are satisfied. Generally, this occurs with the transfer of ~~loss are transferred to an external customer.~~ control of products or services. Revenues related to marketing for third parties are presented on a gross basis ~~when~~as the company controls the product prior to the sale to the end customer, takes title of the product and ~~assumes risk of loss.~~has inventory risk. Unearned revenue is recorded for goods in transit when the company has received payment but ~~the title~~control has not yet been transferred to the customer. Revenues for receiving, storing, transferring and transporting ethanol and other fuels are recognized when the product is delivered to the customer.

The company routinely enters into ~~fixed-price,~~ physical-delivery energy commodity purchase and sale agreements. At times, the company settles these transactions by transferring its obligations to other counterparties rather than delivering the physical commodity. ~~These~~Energy trading transactions are reported net as a component of ~~revenues.~~revenue. Revenues include net gains or losses from derivatives related to products sold while cost of goods sold includes net gains or losses from derivatives related to commodities purchased. Revenues also include realized gains and losses on related derivative financial instruments ~~ineffectiveness on cash flow hedges~~ and reclassifications of realized gains and losses on ~~effective~~ cash flow hedges from accumulated other comprehensive income or loss.

Sales of products, including agricultural commodities, ~~cattle and vinegar,~~ are recognized when ~~title~~control of the product ~~and risk of loss are~~is transferred to the customer, which depends on the agreed upon ~~terms. The sales terms provide passage of title when~~ shipment ~~is made~~ or ~~the commodity is delivered.~~delivery terms. Revenues related to grain merchandising are presented gross and include shipping and handling, which is also a component of cost of goods sold. Revenues from grain storage are recognized ~~when~~over time as the services are rendered.

Table of Contents

A substantial portion of the partnership revenues are derived from fixed-fee commercial agreements for storage, terminal or transportation services. The partnership recognizes revenue upon transfer of control of product from its storage tanks and fuel terminals, when ~~there~~railcar volumetric capacity is ~~evidence an arrangement exists, risk of loss~~provided, and ~~title transfer to the customer, the price is fixed or determinable, and collectability is reasonably ensured. Revenues from base storage, terminal or~~as truck transportation services are performed. To the extent shortfalls associated with minimum volume commitments in the previous four quarters continue to exist, volumes in excess of the minimum volume commitment are applied to those shortfalls. Remaining excess volumes generating operating lease revenue are recognized ~~once these services are performed, which occurs when~~as incurred.

Shipping and Handling Costs

The company accounts for shipping and handling activities related to contracts with customers as costs to fulfill its promise to transfer the ~~product is delivered to~~associated products. Accordingly, the ~~customer.~~company records customer payments associated with shipping and handling costs as a component of revenue, and classifies such costs as a component of cost of goods sold.

Cost of Goods Sold

Cost of goods sold includes direct labor, materials, shipping and plant overhead costs. Direct labor includes all compensation and related benefits of non-management personnel involved in ethanol ~~plant, vinegar and cattle feedlot operations.~~production. Grain purchasing and receiving costs, excluding labor costs for grain buyers and scale operators, are also included in cost of goods sold. Materials include the cost of corn feedstock, denaturant, and process ~~chemicals, cattle and veterinary supplies.~~chemicals. Corn feedstock costs include ~~unrealized~~ gains and losses on related derivative financial instruments not designated as cash flow hedges, inbound freight charges, inspection costs and transfer costs, as well as ~~realized~~reclassifications of gains and losses on ~~related derivative financial instruments, ineffectiveness on cash flow hedges and reclassifications of realized gains and losses on effective~~ cash flow hedges from accumulated other comprehensive income or loss. Plant overhead consists primarily of plant ~~and feedlot~~ utilities, repairs and maintenance ~~yard expenses~~ and outbound freight charges. Shipping costs incurred by the company, including railcar costs, are also reflected in cost of goods sold.

The company uses exchange-traded futures and options contracts and forward purchase and sale contracts to attempt to minimize the effect of price changes on ethanol, grain and ~~cattle inventories and forward purchase and sales contracts.~~natural gas. Exchange-traded futures and options contracts are valued at quoted market prices and settled predominantly in cash. The company is exposed to loss when counterparties default on forward purchase and sale contracts. Grain inventories held for sale and forward purchase and sale contracts are valued at market prices when available or other market quotes adjusted for differences, primarily in transportation, between the exchange-traded market and local market where the terms of the contract is based. Changes in ~~the fair value of grain~~

~~inventories held for sale,~~ forward purchase ~~and sale~~ contracts and exchange-traded futures and options contracts are recognized as a component of cost of goods sold.

Operations and Maintenance Expenses

In the partnership segment, transportation expenses represent the primary component of operations and maintenance expenses. Transportation expenses ~~includes~~include railcar leases, freight and shipping of the company’s ethanol and co-products, as well as costs incurred storing ethanol at destination terminals.

Derivative Financial Instruments

The company uses various derivative financial instruments, including exchange-traded futures and exchange-traded and over-the-counter options contracts, to attempt to minimize risk and the effect of commodity price changes ~~related~~including but not limited to, corn, ethanol, ~~cattle,~~ natural gas and crude oil. The company monitors and manages this exposure as part of its overall risk management policy to reduce the adverse effect market volatility may have on its operating results. The company may hedge these commodities as one way to mitigate ~~risk,~~risk; however, there may be situations when these hedging activities themselves result in losses.

By using derivatives to hedge exposures to changes in commodity prices, the company is exposed to credit and market risk. The company’s exposure to credit risk includes the counterparty’s failure to fulfill its performance obligations under the terms of the derivative contract. The company minimizes its credit risk by entering into transactions with high quality counterparties, limiting the amount of financial exposure it has with each counterparty and monitoring their financial condition. Market risk is the risk that the value of the financial instrument might be adversely affected by a change in commodity prices or interest rates. The company manages market risk by incorporating parameters to monitor exposure within its risk management strategy, which limits the types of derivative instruments and strategies the company can use and the degree of market risk it can take using derivative instruments.

The company evaluates its physical delivery contracts to determine if they qualify for normal purchase or sale exemptions which are expected to be used or sold over a reasonable period in the normal course of business. Contracts that

Table of Contents

do not meet the normal purchase or sale criteria are recorded at fair value. Changes in fair value are recorded in operating income unless the contracts qualify for, and the company elects, cash flow hedge accounting treatment.

Certain qualifying derivatives related to ethanol production and agribusiness and energy services ~~and food and ingredients segments~~ are designated as cash flow hedges. The company evaluates the derivative instrument to ascertain its effectiveness prior to entering into cash flow hedges. ~~Ineffectiveness is recognized in current period results, while other unrealized~~Unrealized gains and losses are reflected in accumulated other comprehensive income or loss until the gain or loss from the underlying hedged transaction is ~~realized.~~realized and the physical transaction is completed. When it becomes probable a forecasted transaction will not occur, the cash flow hedge treatment is discontinued, which affects earnings. These derivative financial instruments are recognized in current assets or ~~other~~ current liabilities at fair value.

At times, the company hedges its exposure to changes in ~~the value of inventories~~inventory values and designates qualifying derivatives as fair value hedges. The carrying amount of the hedged inventory is adjusted in the current period ~~results~~ for changes in fair value. Ineffectiveness of the hedges is recognized in the current period ~~results~~ to the extent the change in fair value of the inventory is not offset by the change in fair value of the derivative.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

~~Effective January 1, 2017,~~In December 2019, the ~~company adopted the~~FASB issued amended guidance in ASC ~~Topic 330,~~ ~~Inventory:~~740, Income Taxes - Simplifying the ~~Measurement of Inventory~~, Accounting for Income Taxes, which requires inventory to be measured at lower of cost or net realizable value. Net realizable value is the estimated selling prices during the ordinary course of business, less reasonably predictable costs of completion, disposal and transportation. The amended guidance was applied prospectively.

~~Effective January 1, 2017, the company adopted the amended guidance in ASC Topic 718,~~ ~~Compensation – Stock Compensation: Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting~~, which requires all income tax effects related to awards to be recognized in the income statement when the awards vest or settle. The amended guidance also allows an employer to repurchase more of an employee’s shares for tax withholding purposes without triggering liability accounting and make a policy election to account for forfeitures as they occur. The amended guidance requiring recognition of excess tax benefits and tax deficiencies in the income statement was applied prospectively. The amended guidance related to the timing of when excess tax benefits are recognized, did not have an impact on the consolidated financial statements. The amended guidance related to the presentation of employee taxes paid on the statement of cash flows was applied retrospectively. This change resulted in ~~a $2.2 million~~ ~~increase in cash flows from operating activities and a decrease in cash flows from financing~~

~~activities for the nine months ended September 30, 2016. The company has elected to account for forfeitures as they occur. This change did not have a material impact on the financial~~ ~~statements.~~

~~Effective January 1, 2018, the company will adopt the amended guidance in ASC Topic 230,~~ ~~Statement of Cash Flows: Restricted Cash~~, which requires amounts generally described as restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents to be included with cash and cash equivalents when reconciling the beginning-of-period and end-of-period total amounts shown on the statement of cash flows. The amended guidance will be applied retrospectively.

~~Effective January 1, 2018, the company will adopt the amended guidance in ASC Topic 606,~~ ~~Revenue from Contracts with Customers~~. ASC Topic 606 is designed to create improved revenue recognition and disclosure comparability in financial statements. The provisions of ASC Topic 606 include a five-step process by which an entity will determine revenue recognition, depicting the transfer of goods or services to customers in amounts which reflect the payment an entity expects to be entitled to in exchange for goods or services. The new guidance requires the company to apply the following steps: (1) identify the contract with the customer; (2) identify the performance obligations in the contract; (3) determine the transaction price; (4) allocate the transaction price to the performance obligations in the contract; and (5) recognize revenue when, or as, the company satisfies the performance obligation. In addition, ASC Topic 606 requires certain disclosures about contracts with customers and provides comprehensive guidance for transactions such as service revenue, contract modifications and multiple-element arrangements. The new standard is effective for fiscal years and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2017, and allows for early adoption.

The company completed a comparison of the current revenue recognition policies to ASC Topic 606 requirements for each of the company’s major revenue categories. Results indicate that the amended guidance will not materially change the amount or timing of revenues recognized by the company and the majority of the company's contracts will continue to be recognized at a point in time and that the number of performance obligations andsimplifies the accounting for ~~variable consideration are not expected~~income taxes by removing certain exceptions to ~~be significantly different from current practice. In addition, many of~~ the ~~company's sales contracts are considered derivatives under ASC Topic 815,~~ ~~Derivatives and Hedging~~, and are therefore excluded from the scope of Topic 606. ASC Topic 606 also requires disclosure of significant changes in contract asset and contract liability balances between periods and the amount of the transaction price allocated to performance obligations that are unsatisfied or partially unsatisfied as of the end of the reporting period, when applicable. ASC Topic 606 may be adopted retrospectively to each prior reporting period presented or as a cumulative-effect adjustment as of the date of adoption. The company anticipates adopting the amended guidance using the modified retrospective transition method.

~~Effective January 1, 2018, the company will adopt the amended guidance~~general principles in ASC ~~Topic~~740. The amendments also improve consistent application of and simplify U.S. GAAP for other areas of ASC 740~~Income Taxes: Intra-Entity Transfers of Assets other than Inventory, which requires the recognition of current~~by clarifying and ~~deferred income tax consequences of an intra-entity transfer of an asset other than inventory when the transfer occurs.~~amending existing guidance. The ~~amended guidance will be applied on a modified retrospective basis, with a cumulative-effect adjustment to retained earnings as of the beginning of the year of adoption.~~

~~Effective January 1, 2018, the company will adopt the amended guidance in ASC Topic 805,~~ ~~Business Combinations: Clarifying the Definition of a Business~~, which clarifies the definition of a business with the objective of adding guidance to assist companies and other reporting organizations with evaluating whether transactions should be accounted for as acquisitions or disposals of assets or businesses. The amended guidance will be applied prospectively.

~~Effective January 1, 2019, the company will adopt the amended guidance in ASC Topic 842,~~ ~~Leases~~, which aims to make leasing activities more transparent and comparable, requiring substantially all leases to be recognized by lessees on the balance sheet as a right-of-use asset and corresponding lease liability, including leases currently accounted for as operating leases. The new standard isamendments are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, ~~2018~~2021, and interim periods within ~~those~~fiscal years ~~and allows for early adoption.~~beginning after December 15, 2022. Early adoption of the amendments is permitted. The company ~~has established an implementation team to evaluate~~is evaluating the impact of this standard on its consolidated financial statements.

In March 2020, the ~~new standard.~~ FASB issued amended guidance in ASC 848, Reference Rate Reform - Facilitation of the Effects of Reference Rate Reform on Financial Reporting, which provides optional expedients and exceptions to U.S. GAAP guidance on contract modifications and hedge accounting to ease the financial reporting burden related to the expected market transition from the LIBOR and other interbank offered rates to alternative reference rates. The ~~new standard will significantly increase right-of-use assets~~expedients and ~~lease liabilities~~exceptions provided by the amended guidance do not apply to contract modifications made and hedging relationships entered into or evaluated after December 31, 2022, except for hedging relationships existing as of December 31, 2022, that an entity has elected certain optional expedients for and that are retained through the end of the hedging relationship. The guidance is effective upon issuance and to be applied prospectively from any date beginning March 12, 2020 through December 31, 2022. The amended guidance is not expected to have a material impact on the company’s consolidated ~~balance sheet, primarily due~~financial statements.

2. REVENUE

Revenue Recognition

Revenue is recognized when obligations under the terms of a contract with a customer are satisfied. Generally this occurs with the transfer of control of products or services. Revenue is measured as the amount of consideration expected to ~~operating leases~~be received in exchange for transferring goods or providing services. Sales, value add, and other taxes the company collects concurrent with revenue-producing activities are excluded from revenue.

‎

Table of Contents

Revenue by Source

The following tables disaggregate revenue by major source for the three and six months ended June 30, 2020 and 2019 (in thousands):


	Three Months Ended June 30, 2020
	Ethanol Production		Agribusiness & Energy Services		Food & Ingredients		Partnership		Eliminations		Total
Revenues:
Revenues from contracts with customers under ASC 606:
Ethanol	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-
Distillers grains		4,589		-		-		-		-		4,589
Service revenues		-		-		-		1,267		-		1,267
Other		1,232		1,870		-		-		-		3,102
Intersegment revenues		25		-		-		1,838		(1,863)		-
Total revenues from contracts with customers		5,846		1,870		-		3,105		(1,863)		8,958
Revenues from contracts accounted for as derivatives under ASC 815 ⁽¹⁾:
Ethanol		218,816		90,907		-		-		-		309,723
Distillers grains		55,635		13,555		-		-		-		69,190
Corn oil		9,504		12,146		-		-		-		21,650
Grain		-		7,724		-		-		-		7,724
Other		741		(114)		-		-		-		627
Intersegment revenues		-		4,368		-		-		(4,368)		-
Total revenues from contracts accounted for as derivatives		284,696		128,586		-		-		(4,368)		408,914
Leasing revenues under ASC 842 ⁽²⁾:		-		-		-		17,276		(17,159)		117
Total Revenues	$	290,542	$	130,456	$	-	$	20,381	$	(23,390)	$	417,989


	Six Months Ended June 30, 2020
	Ethanol Production		Agribusiness & Energy Services		Food & Ingredients		Partnership		Eliminations		Total
Revenues:
Revenues from contracts with customers under ASC 606:
Ethanol	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-
Distillers grains		21,064		-		-		-		-		21,064
Service revenues		-		-		-		2,446		-		2,446
Other		4,191		2,260		-		-		-		6,451
Intersegment revenues		50		-		-		3,912		(3,962)		-
Total revenues from contracts with customers		25,305		2,260		-		6,358		(3,962)		29,961
Revenues from contracts accounted for as derivatives under ASC 815 ⁽¹⁾:
Ethanol		585,908		217,000		-		-		-		802,908
Distillers grains		128,162		18,264		-		-		-		146,426
Corn oil		24,188		17,876		-		-		-		42,064
Grain		6		15,674		-		-		-		15,680
Other		2,698		10,895		-		-		-		13,593
Intersegment revenues		-		11,676		-		-		(11,676)		-
Total revenues from contracts accounted for as derivatives		740,962		291,385		-		-		(11,676)		1,020,671
Leasing revenues under ASC 842 ⁽²⁾:		-		-		-		34,294		(34,068)		226
Total Revenues	$	766,267	$	293,645	$	-	$	40,652	$	(49,706)	$	1,050,858

‎

Table of Contents


	Three Months Ended June 30, 2019 ⁽³⁾
	Ethanol Production		Agribusiness & Energy Services		Food & Ingredients		Partnership		Eliminations		Total
Revenues:
Revenues from contracts with customers under ASC 606:
Ethanol	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-
Distillers grains		13,724		-		-		-		-		13,724
Service revenues		-		-		-		1,608		-		1,608
Other		1,773		442		-		-		-		2,215
Intersegment revenues		26		-		-		1,829		(1,855)		-
Total revenues from contracts with customers		15,523		442		-		3,437		(1,855)		17,547
Revenues from contracts accounted for as derivatives under ASC 815 ⁽¹⁾:
Ethanol		355,385		136,225		-		-		-		491,610
Distillers grains		66,139		9,629		-		-		-		75,768
Corn oil		12,994		10,463		-		-		-		23,457
Grain		-		19,229		-		-		-		19,229
Other		902		1,973		-		-		-		2,875
Intersegment revenues		-		7,007		-		-		(7,007)		-
Total revenues from contracts accounted for as derivatives		435,420		184,526		-		-		(7,007)		612,939
Leasing revenues under ASC 842 ⁽²⁾:		-		-		-		17,388		(17,304)		84
Total Revenues	$	450,943	$	184,968	$	-	$	20,825	$	(26,166)	$	630,570


	Six Months Ended June 30, 2019⁽³⁾
	Ethanol Production		Agribusiness & Energy Services		Food & Ingredients		Partnership		Eliminations		Total
Revenues:
Revenues from contracts with customers under ASC 606:
Ethanol	$	620	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	620
Distillers grains		31,405		-		-		-		-		31,405
Service revenues		-		-		-		3,691		-		3,691
Other		2,008		620		-		-		-		2,628
Intersegment revenues		51		-		-		3,221		(3,272)		-
Total revenues from contracts with customers		34,084		620		-		6,912		(3,272)		38,344
Revenues from contracts accounted for as derivatives under ASC 815 ⁽¹⁾:
Ethanol		556,543		213,302		-		-		-		769,845
Distillers grains		102,738		26,088		-		-		-		128,826
Corn oil		21,607		17,434		1,452		-		-		40,493
Grain		136		40,084		-		-		-		40,220
Other		6,668		44,509		-		-		-		51,177
Intersegment revenues		-		12,139		-		-		(12,139)		-
Total revenues from contracts accounted for as derivatives		687,692		353,556		1,452		-		(12,139)		1,030,561
Leasing revenues under ASC 840 ⁽²⁾:		-		-		-		35,000		(34,694)		306
Total Revenues	$	721,776	$	354,176	$	1,452	$	41,912	$	(50,105)	$	1,069,211

(1)Revenues from contracts accounted for as derivatives represent physically settled derivative sales that are ~~currently~~outside the scope of ASC 606, where the company recognizes revenue when control of the inventory is transferred within the meaning of ASC 606 as required by ASC 610-20, Gains and Losses from Derecognition of Nonfinancial Assets.

(2)Leasing revenues do not represent revenues recognized from contracts with customers under ASC 606, and are accounted for under ASC 842, Leases.

(3)Revenues include certain items which were previously considered intercompany transactions prior to the disposition of GPCC and therefore eliminated upon consolidation. These revenue transactions are now presented on a gross basis in product revenues. These revenue transactions total $5.7 million and $9.1 million for the ~~balance sheet. The company anticipates adopting~~three and six months ended June 30, 2019.

Major Customers

Revenue from Customer A represented 16% and 18% of total revenues for the ~~amended guidance using~~three and six months ended June 30, 2020, respectively, and 10% and 12% of total revenues for the ~~modified retrospective transition method.~~three and six months ended June 30, 2019, respectively. Revenue from Customer B represented 11% of total revenues for the three ended June 30, 2019. Revenues from these customers are reported in the ethanol production segment.

~~Effective January~~

Table of Contents

3. DISPOSITIONS AND DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS

DISPOSITIONS

Disposition of Green Plains Cattle Company LLC

On September 1, 2019, the ~~amended guidance in ASC Topic 815,~~ ~~Derivatives~~company, TGAM Agribusiness Fund Holdings-B LP (“TGAM”) and ~~Hedging: Targeted Improvements to Accounting for Hedging Activities, becomes effective. ASC Topic 815 is designed to improve~~StepStone Atlantic Fund, L.P. (“StepStone”) formed a joint venture and entered into the ~~alignment~~LLC Agreement. GPCC was previously a wholly owned subsidiary of risk management activities and financial reporting for hedging relationships through changes to both the designation and measurement guidance for qualifying hedging relationships and the presentation of hedging results. The provisions of Topic 815 expand and refine hedge accounting for both nonfinancial and financial risk components and align the recognition and presentation of the effects of the hedging instrument and the hedged item in the financial statements. For cash flow and net investment hedges existing at the date of adoption, an entity should apply a cumulative-effect adjustment related to

eliminating the separate measurement of ineffectiveness to accumulated other comprehensive income with a corresponding adjustment to the opening balance of retained earnings as of the beginning of the fiscal year that an entity adopts the amendments in this update. Early adoption is permitted and the amended presentation and disclosure guidance is required only prospectively. Based on the company’s initial assessment, no material changes are anticipated and the company intends to implement the amended guidance in ASC Topic 815 in either the fourth quarter of fiscal 2017 or the first quarter of fiscal 2018.

~~Effective January 1, 2020, the company will adopt the amended guidance in ASC Topic 350,~~ ~~Intangibles – Goodwill and Other: Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment~~, which simplifies the measurement of goodwill by eliminating Step 2 from the goodwill impairment test. The annual goodwill impairment test will be performed by comparing the fair value of a reporting unit with its carrying amount. An impairment charge equal to the amount by which the carrying amount exceeds the reporting unit’s fair value, not to exceed the total amount of goodwill allocated to that reporting unit, would be recognized. The amended guidance will be applied prospectively.

~~2. ACQUISITIONS~~

~~Acquisition of Cattle Feedlots~~

On May 16, 2017, the company acquired two cattle-feeding operations from Cargill Cattle Feeders, LLC for $57.7 million, including certain working capital adjustments. The transaction included the feed yards located in Leoti, Kansas and Yuma, Colorado, which added combined feedlot capacity of 155,000 head of cattle to the company’s operations. The transaction was financed using cash on hand. ~~There were no material acquisition costs recorded for the acquisition.~~

~~As part of the transaction, the company~~Green Plains. Green Plains also entered into a ~~long-term cattle supply agreement~~Securities Purchase Agreement with ~~Cargill Meat Solutions Corporation. Under the cattle supply agreement, all cattle placed in the Leoti, Yuma~~TGAM and ~~the company’s existing Kismet, Kansas feedlots will be sold exclusively to Cargill Meat Solutions under~~StepStone, whereby TGAM and StepStone purchased an ~~agreed upon pricing arrangement.~~

~~The purchase price allocation~~ ~~is based on the preliminary results~~aggregate of ~~internal valuations. The purchase price and purchase price allocation are preliminary until contractual post-closing working capital adjustments and valuations are finalized.~~

~~The following is a summary~~50% of the ~~preliminary purchase price~~membership interests of ~~assets acquired and liabilities assumed (in thousands):~~


~~Amounts of Identifiable Assets Acquired~~ ~~and Liabilities Assumed~~
~~Inventory~~		$	~~20,576~~
~~Prepaid expenses and other~~			52
~~Property and equipment, net~~			~~37,205~~

~~Current liabilities~~			~~(180)~~
	~~Total identifiable net assets~~	$	~~57,653~~

~~Acquisition of Fleischmann’s Vinegar Company~~

~~On October 3, 2016, the company acquired all of the issued and outstanding stock of SCI Ingredients Holdings, Inc., the holding company of Fleischmann’s Vinegar Company, Inc.,~~GPCC from Green Plains for ~~$258.3~~approximately $76.9 million in cash. ~~A portion~~There was 0 gain or loss recorded as part of this transaction. The LLC Agreement contains certain earn-out or bonus provisions to be paid by or received from GPCC if certain EBITDA thresholds are met. The company will record any gain contingency amounts in the consolidated financial statements when the consideration is received, which is anticipated to be in the third quarter of 2020.

Under the LLC Agreement, Green Plains has certain rights and obligations, including but not limited to, the right or obligation: (i) to designate two Managers to the Board of Managers of GPCC (the “Board”), or in the event the size of the ~~purchase price was used~~Board is increased, the number of Managers equal to ~~repay existing debt. Fleischmann’s Vinegar is one~~two-fifths of the ~~world’s largest producers~~Board, rounded up, and (ii) to fund additional capital contributions in accordance with their percentage interest upon mutual agreement by Green Plains, TGAM and StepStone. Additionally, TGAM and StepStone both have the right or obligation to designate one Manager, or in the event the size of ~~food-grade industrial vinegar.~~the Board is increased, the number of Managers equal to one-fifths of the Board, rounded up. Each Manager serving on the Board shall have one vote and a majority of the Managers serving on the Board shall constitute a quorum for the transaction of business of the Board. Green Plains’ allocation under the LLC Agreement will be subject to certain adjustments.

The assets and liabilities of the GPCC at closing on September 1, 2019 were as follows (in thousands):



Amounts of Identifiable Assets Disposed and Liabilities Relinquished
Cash		$	2
Accounts receivable, net			17,920
Inventory			387,534
Derivative financial instruments			48,189
Property and equipment			71,678
Other assets			2,291

Current liabilities			(49,297)
Short-term notes payable and other borrowings			(38)
Current maturities of long-term debt			(324,028)
Long-term debt			(80)
Other liabilities			(403)
	Total identifiable net assets disposed	$	153,768

DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS

After closing, GPCC is no longer consolidated in the company’s consolidated financial statements and the GPCC investment is accounted for using the equity method of accounting. Additionally, the company concluded that the disposition of GPCC met the requirements under ASC 205-20. As such, GPCC results prior to its disposition are classified as discontinued operations for all applicable periods. Financial results of GPCC were previously recorded within the food and ingredients segment.

‎

Table of Contents

Summarized Results of Discontinued Operations

The following ~~is a summary~~table presents the results of ~~assets acquired~~our discontinued operations (in thousands).


	Three Months Ended June 30, 2019 ⁽¹⁾		Six Months Ended June 30, 2019 ⁽¹⁾

Product revenues	$	270,924	$	478,009

Costs and expenses
Cost of goods sold (excluding depreciation and amortization expenses reflected below)		259,900		464,457
Selling, general and administrative expenses		2,176		4,460
Depreciation and amortization expenses		1,583		3,194
Total costs and expenses		263,659		472,111
Operating income		7,265		5,898

Other income (expense)
Interest income		63		140
Interest expense		(4,720)		(9,416)
Total other expense		(4,657)		(9,276)
Income (loss) before income taxes		2,608		(3,378)
Income tax benefit (expense)		(669)		848
Net income (loss)	$	1,939	$	(2,530)

(1)Product revenues, costs of goods sold and ~~liabilities assumed (in thousands):~~


~~Amounts of Identifiable Assets Acquired~~ ~~and Liabilities Assumed~~
~~Cash~~		$	~~4,148~~
~~Inventory~~			~~9,308~~
~~Accounts receivable, net~~			~~13,919~~
~~Prepaid expenses and other~~			~~1,054~~
~~Property and equipment~~			~~49,175~~
~~Intangible assets~~			~~90,500~~

~~Current liabilities~~			~~(9,689)~~
~~Income taxes payable~~			~~(216)~~
~~Deferred tax liabilities~~			~~(41,882)~~
	~~Total identifiable net assets~~		~~116,317~~

~~Goodwill~~			~~142,002~~
	~~Purchase price~~	$	~~258,319~~

~~The amounts above reflect~~selling, general and administrative expenses include certain revenue and expense items which were previously considered intercompany transactions prior to the ~~final purchase price allocation. As~~disposition of ~~September 30, 2017, based~~ ~~on the final valuations, assets acquired~~GPCC and liabilities assumed were adjusted from the prior quarter to reflect an increase in the fair value of property and equipment of $6.2 million, a decrease in accumulated depreciation of $0.5 million, a decrease in the fair value of intangible assets of $4.0 million, a decrease in accumulated amortization of $0.3 million, a decrease in the fair value of goodwill of $0.8 million, a decrease of $0.1 million in income taxes payable and an increase in deferred tax liabilities of $1.5 million.

~~As of September 30, 2017, based~~ ~~on the final valuations, the company’s customer relationship intangible asset recognized in connection with the Fleischmann’s~~ ~~acquisition~~ is $74.7 million, net of $5.3 million of accumulated amortization, and has a remaining 14-year weighted-average amortization period. As of September 30, 2017, the company also has an indefinite-lived trade name intangible asset of $10.5 million. The company recognized $1.1therefore eliminated upon consolidation. These revenue transactions total $5.7 million and ~~$3.9~~$9.1 million ~~of amortization expense associated with the amortizing customer relationship intangible asset during~~for the three and ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017, respectively, and expects estimated amortization expense for the next five years~~2019, respectively. These costs of goods sold transactions total $5.6 million ~~per annum. The excess~~ purchase price over the intangibles fair values was allocated to goodwill, none of which is expected to be deductible for tax purposes. The goodwill is primarily attributable to the synergies expected to arise after the acquisition.

~~Acquisition of Ethanol Plants~~

~~On September 23, 2016, the company acquired three ethanol plants located in Madison, Illinois, Mount Vernon, Indiana,~~ and ~~York, Nebraska from subsidiaries of Abengoa S.A. for approximately $234.9~~$9.0 million for the ~~ethanol plant assets,~~three and ~~$19.1 million for working capital acquired and liabilities assumed. These ethanol facilities have a combined annual production capacity of~~ ~~approximately 230 mmgy.~~six months ended June 30, 2019, respectively.

~~The following is a summary of~~ ~~assets acquired and~~ ~~liabilities assumed (in thousands):~~


~~Amounts of Identifiable Assets Acquired~~ ~~and Liabilities Assumed~~
~~Inventory~~		$	~~16,904~~
~~Accounts receivable, net~~			~~1,826~~
~~Prepaid expenses and other~~			~~2,224~~
~~Property and equipment, net~~			~~234,947~~
~~Other assets~~			~~3,885~~

~~Current maturities of long-term debt~~			~~(406)~~
~~Current liabilities~~			~~(2,580)~~
~~Long-term debt~~			~~(2,763)~~
	~~Total identifiable net assets~~	$	~~254,037~~

~~The amounts above reflect the final purchase price allocation, which did not change materially from the initial allocation.~~

Concurrently with the company’s acquisition of the Abengoa ethanol plants, on September 23, 2016, the partnership acquired the storage assets of the Abengoa ethanol plants from the company for $90.0 million in a transfer between entities under common control and entered into amendments to the related commercial agreements with Green Plains Trade.

3.4. FAIR VALUE DISCLOSURES

The following methods, assumptions and valuation techniques were used to ~~estimate~~in estimating the fair value of the company’s financial instruments:

Level 1 – unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities the company can access at the measurement date. ~~Level 1 unrealized gains and losses on commodity derivatives relate to exchange-traded open trade equity and option values in the company’s brokerage accounts.~~

Level 2 – directly or indirectly observable inputs such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets other than quoted prices included within Level 1, quoted prices for identical or similar assets in markets that are not active, and other inputs that are observable or can be substantially corroborated by observable market data through correlation or other means. Grain inventories held for sale in the agribusiness and energy services segment are valued at nearby futures values, plus or minus nearby basis.

Level 3 – unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and comprise a significant component of the fair value of the assets or liabilities. The company currently does not have any recurring Level 3 financial instruments.

Derivative contracts include exchange-traded commodity futures and options contracts and forward commodity purchase and sale contracts. Exchange-traded futures and options contracts are valued based on unadjusted quoted prices in active markets and are classified in Level 1. The majority of the company’s exchange-traded futures and options contracts are cash-settled on a daily basis.

‎

Table of Contents

There have been no changes in valuation techniques and inputs used in measuring fair value. The company’s assets and liabilities by level are as follows (in thousands):


	Fair Value Measurements at September 30, 2017
	Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets		Significant Other Observable Inputs		Reclassification for Balance Sheet				Fair Value Measurements at June 30, 2020
	(Level 1)		(Level 2)		Presentation		Total		Quoted Prices in ‎ Active Markets for ‎Identical Assets		Significant Other ‎Observable Inputs
									(Level 1)		(Level 2)		Total
Assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	261,588	$	-	$	-	$	261,588	$	163,362	$	-	$	163,362
Restricted cash		30,773		-		-		30,773		20,234		-		20,234
Margin deposits		52,527		-		(52,527)		-
Inventories carried at market		-		114,410		-		114,410		-		26,572		26,572
Unrealized gains on derivatives		14,690		5,061		31,812		51,563		-		18,714		18,714
Other assets		115		-		-		115		112		3,002		3,114
Total assets measured at fair value	$	359,693	$	119,471	$	(20,715)	$	458,449	$	183,708	$	48,288	$	231,996

Liabilities:
Accounts payable (1)	$	-	$	31,377	$	-	$	31,377	$	-	$	25,347	$	25,347
Unrealized losses on derivatives		20,715		12,004		(20,715)		12,004		-		11,463		11,463
Other		-		15		-		15		-		13		13
Total liabilities measured at fair value	$	20,715	$	43,396	$	(20,715)	$	43,396	$	-	$	36,823	$	36,823


	Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2016
	Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets		Significant Other Observable Inputs		Reclassification for Balance Sheet				Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2019
	(Level 1)		(Level 2)		Presentation		Total		Quoted Prices in ‎ Active Markets for ‎Identical Assets		Significant Other ‎Observable Inputs
									(Level 1)		(Level 2)		Total
Assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	304,211	$	-	$	-	$	304,211	$	245,977	$	-	$	245,977
Restricted cash		51,979		-		-		51,979		23,919		-		23,919
Margin deposits		50,601		-		(50,601)		-
Inventories carried at market (2)		-		154,022		-		154,022
Inventories carried at market										-		73,318		73,318
Unrealized gains on derivatives		8,272		14,818		24,146		47,236		-		14,515		14,515
Other assets		116		-		-		116		113		-		113
Total assets measured at fair value	$	415,179	$	168,840	$	(26,455)	$	557,564	$	270,009	$	87,833	$	357,842

Liabilities:
Accounts payable (1)	$	-	$	35,288	$	-	$	35,288��	$	-	$	37,294	$	37,294
Unrealized losses on derivatives		26,455		8,916		(26,455)		8,916		-		7,771		7,771
Other liabilities		-		81		-		81
Total liabilities measured at fair value	$	26,455	$	44,285	$	(26,455)	$	44,285	$	-	$	45,065	$	45,065

~~(1)~~

~~Accounts payable is generally stated at historical amounts with the~~ ~~exception~~ ~~of $31.4 million and~~ ~~$35.3 million~~ ~~at September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016,~~

(1)Accounts payable is generally stated at historical amounts with the exception of $25.3 million and $37.3 million at June 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019, respectively, related ~~to certain delivered inventory subject~~ to certain delivered inventory for which the payable fluctuates based on changes in commodity prices. These payables are hybrid financial instruments for which the company has elected ~~the fair value option.~~

~~(2)~~

Inventories carried at market have been revised from previously reported results to include $77.0 million of inventories held under a fair value hedging relationship. There was no impact to the financial statements resulting from this revision.

~~The company believes~~ the fair value option.

The fair value of ~~its~~the company’s debt was approximately ~~$1.3 billion~~$520.7 million compared with a book value of ~~$1.3 billion~~ $509.3 millionat ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017, and approximately $1.1 billion compared with a~~2020. The fair value of the company’s debt approximated book value, ~~of $1.1 billion~~which was $564.4 million at December 31, ~~2016.~~2019. The company estimated the fair value of its outstanding debt using Level 2 inputs. The company believes the fair values of its accounts receivable approximated book value, which was ~~$115.0~~$67.2 million and ~~$147.5~~$107.2 million at ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017,~~2020 and December 31, ~~2016,~~2019, respectively.

Although the company currently does not have any recurring Level 3 financial measurements, the fair values of tangible assets and goodwill acquired and the equity component of convertible debt ~~issued~~ represent Level 3 measurements ~~that~~which were

derived using a combination of the income approach, market approach and cost approach for the specific assets or liabilities being valued.

‎

5. SEGMENT INFORMATION

~~As a result of acquisitions during 2016, the~~The company ~~implemented organizational segment changes during the fourth quarter of 2016, whereby the company management now~~ reports the financial and operating performance infor the following four operating segments: (1) ethanol production, which includes the production of ethanol, including industrial-grade alcohol, distillers grains and corn oil, (2) agribusiness and energy services, which includes grain handling and storage, ~~and~~commodity marketing and merchant trading for company-produced and third-party ethanol, distillers grains, corn oil, natural gas and other commodities, (3) food and ingredients, which includes ~~cattle feedlots, vinegar production and~~ food-grade corn oil ~~operations~~ and (4) partnership, which includes fuel storage and transportation services. ~~Prior periods have been reclassified to conform to the revised segment presentation.~~

The company has re-evaluated the profitability measure of its reportable segments’ operating performance and has determined that segment EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization) is primarily used by the company’s management to evaluate segment operating activities, and therefore is a more meaningful profitability measure than the previously reported segment operating income. In addition, EBITDA is a financial measure that is widely used by analysts and investors in the company’s industries. As a result, the company is now including segment EBITDA as a performance measure.

During the normal course of business, the operating segments conduct business with each other. For example, the agribusiness and energy services segment procures grain and natural gas and sells products, including ethanol, distillers grains and corn oil for the ethanol production segment. The partnership segment provides fuel storage and transportation services for the ~~agribusiness and energy services~~ethanol production segment. These intersegment activities are treated like third-party transactions with origination, marketing and storage fees charged at estimated market values. Consequently, these transactions affect segment performance; however, they do not impact the company’s consolidated results since the revenues and corresponding costs are eliminated.

The following tables set forth certain financial data for the company’s operating segments (in thousands):


	Three Months Ended September 30,				Nine Months Ended September 30,				Three Months Ended ‎June 30,				Six Months Ended ‎June 30,
	2017		2016		2017		2016		2020		2019⁽¹⁾		2020		2019⁽¹⁾
Revenues:
Ethanol production:
Revenues from external customers	$	620,180	$	586,988	$	1,857,356	$	1,710,484	$	290,517	$	450,917	$	766,217	$	721,725
Intersegment revenues		3,579		-		6,624		-		25		26		50		51
Total segment revenues		623,759		586,988		1,863,980		1,710,484		290,542		450,943		766,267		721,776
Agribusiness and energy services:
Revenues from external customers		164,604		168,143		483,670		531,445		126,088		177,961		281,969		342,037
Intersegment revenues		14,406		8,936		33,679		24,934		4,368		7,007		11,676		12,139
Total segment revenues		179,010		177,079		517,349		556,379		130,456		184,968		293,645		354,176
Food and ingredients:
Revenues from external customers		114,750		84,655		329,432		230,812		-		-		-		1,452
Intersegment revenues		38		37		113		112		-		-		-		-
Total segment revenues		114,788		84,692		329,545		230,924		-		-		-		1,452
Partnership:
Revenues from external customers		1,701		2,066		4,724		6,042		1,384		1,692		2,672		3,997
Intersegment revenues		24,748		24,139		74,019		69,445		18,997		19,133		37,980		37,915
Total segment revenues		26,449		26,205		78,743		75,487		20,381		20,825		40,652		41,912
Revenues including intersegment activity		944,006		874,964		2,789,617		2,573,274		441,379		656,736		1,100,564		1,119,316
Intersegment eliminations		(42,771)		(33,112)		(114,435)		(94,491)		(23,390)		(26,166)		(49,706)		(50,105)
Revenues as reported	$	901,235	$	841,852	$	2,675,182	$	2,478,783	$	417,989	$	630,570	$	1,050,858	$	1,069,211

Table of Contents


	Three Months Ended ‎June 30,				Six Months Ended ‎June 30,
	2020		2019⁽¹⁾		2020		2019⁽¹⁾
Cost of goods sold:
Ethanol production	$	284,174	$	483,352	$	773,324	$	776,839
Agribusiness and energy services		125,768		176,214		282,270		335,840
Food and ingredients		-		6		-		1,522
Intersegment eliminations		(19,081)		(25,612)		(47,505)		(45,850)
	$	390,861	$	633,960	$	1,008,089	$	1,068,351

~~The following table sets forth third-party revenues by product line (in thousands):~~

(1)Cost of goods sold include certain items which were previously considered intercompany transactions prior to the disposition of GPCC and therefore eliminated upon consolidation. These cost of goods sold transactions are now presented on a gross basis in cost of goods sold. These costs of goods sold transactions total $5.6 million and $9.0 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2019, respectively.

Three Months Ended
September 30,

Nine Months Ended
September 30,

2017

2016

2017

2016
Revenues:

Ethanol
$
625,787

$
550,724

$
1,830,887

$
1,622,168
Distillers grains

97,136

129,345

303,527

357,070
Corn oil

33,678

49,844

121,166

111,727
Grain

19,338

30,003

73,860

145,800
Food and ingredients

112,697

70,012

305,211

201,423
Service revenues

1,701

2,066

4,724

6,042
Other

10,898

9,858

35,807

34,553

$
901,235

$
841,852

$
2,675,182

$
2,478,783


	Three Months Ended ‎June 30,				Six Months Ended ‎June 30,
	2020		2019		2020		2019
Operating income (loss):
Ethanol production⁽¹⁾	$	(18,792)	$	(53,885)	$	(79,573)	$	(98,077)
Agribusiness and energy services		351		4,341		2,911		9,645
Food and ingredients		-		(5)		-		(70)
Partnership		12,225		13,156		24,655		25,707
Intersegment eliminations		(4,283)		(528)		(2,150)		(4,205)
Corporate activities		(8,869)		(9,724)		(19,539)		(18,283)
	$	(19,368)	$	(46,645)	$	(73,696)	$	(85,283)

(1)Operating loss for ethanol production includes a goodwill impairment charge of $24.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2020.


	Three Months Ended ‎June 30,				Six Months Ended ‎June 30,
	2020		2019		2020		2019
Depreciation and amortization:
Ethanol production	$	17,184	$	15,437	$	33,082	$	30,777
Agribusiness and energy services		556		552		1,109		1,101
Partnership		966		771		1,927		1,756
Corporate activities		669		751		1,337		1,501
	$	19,375	$	17,511	$	37,455	$	35,135

The following table sets forth total assets by operating segment (in thousands):


	September 30, 2017		December 31, 2016		June 30, 2020		December 31, 2019
Total assets (1):
Ethanol production	$	1,137,903	$	1,206,155	$	922,962	$	884,293
Agribusiness and energy services		467,955		579,977		271,296		410,400
Food and ingredients		691,663		406,429
Partnership		72,965		74,999		89,072		90,011
Corporate assets		272,844		257,652		298,100		324,280
Intersegment eliminations		(14,793)		(18,720)		(10,355)		(10,766)
	$	2,628,537	$	2,506,492	$	1,571,075	$	1,698,218

~~(1)~~

~~Asset balances by segment exclude intercompany receivable balances.~~

5.(1)Asset balances by segment exclude intercompany balances.

‎

6. INVENTORIES

Inventories are carried at the lower of cost or net realizable value, except ~~for commodities~~grain held for sale and fair-value hedged inventories. Commodities held for sale are reported at market value. There was 0 lower of cost or net realizable value inventory adjustment as of June 30, 2020. As of December 31, 2019, the company recorded a $6.6 million lower of cost or net realized value inventory adjustment reflected in cost of goods sold within the ethanol production segment.

The components of inventories are as follows (in thousands):


	June 30, 2020		December 31, 2019
Finished goods	$	55,891	$	85,975
Commodities held for sale		18,700		42,836
Raw materials		51,711		77,900
Work-in-process		11,621		13,523
Supplies and parts		35,198		32,758
	$	173,121	$	252,992

September 30,
2017

December 31,
2016
Finished goods
$
123,860

$
99,009
Commodities held for sale

42,783

65,926
Raw materials

128,072

135,516
Work-in-process

283,936

91,093
Supplies and parts

33,796

30,637

$
612,447

$
422,181

7. GOODWILL

The company had 2 reporting units, to which goodwill was assigned. We are required to perform impairment tests related to our goodwill annually, which we perform as of October 1, or sooner if an indicator of impairment occurs. Near term industry outlook due to the significant decrease in crude oil prices, lower gasoline demand, general uncertainty due to the COVID-19 outbreak and the subsequent decline in our stock price caused a decline in the company’s market capitalization during the three months ended March 31, 2020. As such, the company determined a triggering event had occurred that required an interim impairment assessment for its ethanol production reporting unit. Due to the impairment indicators noted as a result of these triggering events, we evaluated our goodwill as of March 31, 2020. Significant assumptions inherent in the valuation methodologies for goodwill were employed and included, but were not limited to, prospective financial information, growth rates, discount rates, inflationary factors, and cost of capital. Based on our quantitative evaluation, we determined that the fair value of the ethanol production reporting unit did not exceed its carrying value. As a result, we concluded that the goodwill assigned to the ethanol production reporting unit was impaired and recorded a non-cash impairment charge of $24.1 million.

Based on similar factors as noted above, the company determined a triggering event had occurred that required an interim impairment assessment for its partnership reporting unit. Due to the impairment indicators noted as a result of these triggering events, we evaluated goodwill as of June 30, 2020. Significant assumptions inherent in the valuation methodologies for goodwill are employed and include, but are not limited to, prospective financial information, growth rates, discount rates, inflationary factors, and cost of capital. Based on the company’s quantitative evaluation of the partnership’s goodwill as of June 30, 2020, it was determined that the fair value of the partnership reporting unit exceeded its carrying value. As a result, the company concluded that the goodwill assigned to the partnership reporting unit was not impaired, but could be at risk of future impairment.

Changes in the carrying amount of goodwill attributable to each business segment ~~for~~during the ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017,~~2020 were as follows (in thousands):

Ethanol Production

Food and Food

Production

Ingredients

Partnership

Total
Balance, December 31, 2016
$
30,279

$
142,819

$
10,598

$
183,696
Adjustment to preliminary Fleischmann's Vinegar Valuation

-

(817)

-

(817)
Balance, September 30, 2017
$
30,279

$
142,002

$
10,598

$
182,879


	Ethanol
	Production		Partnership		Total
Balance, December 31, 2019	$	24,091	$	10,598	$	34,689
Impairment charge		(24,091)		-		(24,091)
Balance, June 30, 2020	$	-	$	10,598	$	10,598

~~As of September 30, 2017, based on the final valuations in connection with the Fleischmann’s acquisition, the fair value of goodwill was reduced by $0.8 million.~~

‎

7.8. DERIVATIVE FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

At ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017,~~2020, the company’s consolidated balance sheet reflected unrealized ~~losses~~gains of ~~$13.6~~$12.8 million, net of tax, in accumulated other comprehensive ~~loss.~~income which primarily related to our share of equity method investees other comprehensive income. The company expects these ~~losses~~gains will be reclassified ~~in operating~~as income from equity method investees, net of income taxes over the next 12 months as a result of hedged transactions that are forecasted to occur. The amount realized in ~~operating~~ income from equity method investees, net of income taxes will differ as commodity prices change.

Fair Values of Derivative Instruments

The fair values of the company’s derivative financial instruments and the line items on the consolidated balance sheets where they are reported are as follows (in thousands):


	Asset Derivatives'						Liability Derivatives'
	Fair Value						Fair Value
	June 30, ‎2020			December 31, ‎2019			June 30, ‎2020			December 31, ‎2019
Derivative financial instruments	$	18,714	⁽¹⁾	$	14,515	⁽²⁾	$	11,463	⁽³⁾	$	7,771
Other assets		2			-			-			-
Other liabilities		-			-			13			-
Total	$	18,716		$	14,515		$	11,476		$	7,771

(1)At June 30, 2020, derivative financial instruments, as reflected on the balance sheet, includes net unrealized gains on exchange traded futures and options contracts of $0.3 million.

Asset Derivatives'

Liability Derivatives'

Fair Value

Fair Value

September 30,
2017

December 31,
2016

September 30,
2017

December 31,
2016
Derivative financial instruments (1)

$
5,061

$
14,818
(3)
$
-

$
-
Accrued and other liabilities

-

-

18,029 (2)

27,099
Other liabilities

-

-

15

81
Total

$
5,061

$
14,818

$
18,044

$
27,180

~~(1)~~

Derivative financial instruments as reflected on the consolidated balance sheets include related margin deposit assets of $52.5 million and $50.6 million at September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively.

~~(2)~~

~~Balance~~ ~~at September 30, 2017~~ ~~includes $15.7 million~~ ~~of net unrealized losses on derivative financial instruments designated as cash flow hedging instruments.~~

~~(3)~~

~~Balance at December 31, 2016 includes $17.0 million of net unrealized losses on derivative financial instruments designated as cash flow hedging instruments.~~

(2)At December 31, 2019, derivative financial instruments, as reflected on the balance sheet, includes net unrealized gains on exchange traded futures and options contracts of $3.4 million, which include $0.1 million of net unrealized gains on derivative financial instruments designated as cash flow hedging instruments.

(3)At June 30, 2020, derivative financial instruments, as reflected on the balance sheet, includes net unrealized losses on exchange traded futures and options contracts of $4.0 million.

Refer to Note 34 - Fair Value Disclosures, which contains fair value information related to derivative financial instruments.

Effect of Derivative Instruments on Consolidated Balance Sheets, Consolidated Statements of Operations and Consolidated Statements of ~~Stockholders’ Equity and~~ Comprehensive Income

The gains or losses recognized in income and other comprehensive income ~~(loss)~~ related to the company’s derivative financial instruments and the line items on the consolidated financial statements where they are reported are as follows (in thousands):

Gains (Losses) on Derivative Instruments Not

Three Months Ended
September 30,

Nine Months Ended
September 30,
Designated in a Hedging Relationship

2017

2016

2017

2016
Revenues

$
2,863

$
(1,084)

$
(7,400)

$
6,187
Cost of goods sold

2,036

(39)

17,256

(8,740)
Net increase (decrease) recognized in earnings before tax

$
4,899

$
(1,123)

$
9,856

$
(2,553)


	Amount of Gain (Loss) Reclassified from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income into Income
Location of Gain (Loss) Reclassified from Accumulated Other	Three Months Ended ‎June 30,				Six Months Ended ‎June 30,
Comprehensive Income into Income	2020		2019		2020		2019
Revenues	$	6	$	-	$	8,824	$	-
Cost of goods sold		-		-		(2,901)		-
Net income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of income taxes		-		(4,387)		-		(17,903)
Net gain (loss) recognized in loss before tax	$	6	$	(4,387)	$	5,923	$	(17,903)

Gains (Losses) Due to Ineffectiveness

Three Months Ended
September 30,

Nine Months Ended
September 30,
of Cash Flow Hedges

2017

2016

2017

2016
Revenues

$
(48)

$
34

$
(229)

$
(5)
Cost of goods sold

(213)

96

(213)

(65)
Net increase (decrease) recognized in earnings before tax

$
(261)

$
130

$
(442)

$
(70)


	Amount of Gain (Loss) Recognized in Other Comprehensive Income on Derivatives
Gain (Loss) Recognized in Other Comprehensive Income on	Three Months Ended ‎June 30,				Six Months Ended ‎June 30,
Derivatives	2020		2019		2020		2019
Commodity contracts	$	(1,761)	$	43,144	$	4,218	$	34,181

‎

Gains (Losses) Reclassified from Accumulated
Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)

Three Months Ended
September 30,

Nine Months Ended
September 30,
into Net Income

2017

2016

2017

2016
Revenues

$
(5,242)

$
25,254

$
1,734

$
12,029
Cost of goods sold

(1,861)

(28,548)

(1,679)

(15,904)
Net increase (decrease) recognized in earnings before tax

$
(7,103)

$
(3,294)

$
55

$
(3,875)


		Amount of Gain (Loss)
		Recognized in Income on Derivatives
Derivatives Not Designated	Location of Gain (Loss) ‎Recognized in Income	Three Months Ended ‎June 30,				Six Months Ended ‎June 30,
as Hedging Instruments	on Derivatives	2020		2019		2020		2019
Commodity contracts	Revenues	$	(15,598)	$	(11,649)	$	29,809	$	(24,473)
Commodity contracts	Costs of goods sold		9,173		(10,359)		6,494		(6,949)
Commodity contracts	Net loss from discontinued operations, net of income taxes		-		5,556		-		(185)
Net gain (loss) recognized in loss before tax		$	(6,425)	$	(16,452)	$	36,303	$	(31,607)

The following amounts were recorded on the consolidated balance sheets related to cumulative basis adjustments for the fair value hedged items (in thousands):


	June 30, 2020				December 31, 2019
Line Item in the Consolidated Balance Sheet in Which the Hedged Item is Included	Carrying Amount of the Hedged Assets		Cumulative Amount of Fair Value Hedging Adjustment Included in the Carrying Amount of the Hedged Assets		Carrying Amount of the Hedged Assets		Cumulative Amount of Fair Value Hedging Adjustment Included in the Carrying Amount of the Hedged Assets
Inventories	$	19,342	$	(3,105)	$	55,021	$	(2,808)

‎

Effective Portion of Cash Flow
Hedges Recognized in

Three Months Ended
September 30,

Nine Months Ended
September 30,
Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)

2017

2016

2017

2016
Commodity Contracts

$
(12,235)

$
3,250

$
(15,069)

$
(2,157)

Table of Contents

Effect of Cash Flow and Fair Value Hedge Accounting on the Statements of Operations

The effect of cash flow and fair value hedges and the line items on the consolidated statements of operations where they are reported are as follows (in thousands):


	Location and Amount of Gain or (Loss) Recognized in
	Income on Cash Flow and Fair Value Hedging Relationships
	for the Three Months Ended June 30,
		2020						2019
	Revenue		Cost of ‎Goods Sold		Income (Loss) from Discontinued Operations, Net of Income Taxes			Revenue	Cost of ‎Goods Sold		Income (Loss) from Discontinued Operations, Net of Income Taxes
Gain (loss) on cash flow hedging relationships:

Commodity contracts:
Amount of gain (loss) reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income into income	$	6	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	(4,387)

Gain (loss) on fair value hedging relationships:

Commodity contracts:
Hedged item		-		(335)		-		-		723		-
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments		-		486		-		-		571		-

Total amounts of income and expense line items presented in the statement of operations in which the effects of cash flow or fair value hedges are recorded	$	6	$	151	$	-	$	-	$	1,294	$	(4,387)

‎

Gains (Losses) from Fair Value

Three Months Ended
September 30,

Nine Months Ended
September 30,
Hedges of Inventory

2017

2016

2017

2016
Revenues (effect of change in inventory value)

$
61

$
(40)

$
1,451

$
1,379
Cost of goods sold (effect of change in inventory value)

(1,775)

(470)

(6,229)

7,712
Revenues (effect of fair value hedge)

(61)

40

(1,734)

(1,379)
Cost of goods sold (effect of fair value hedge)

3,085

918

8,530

(7,648)
Ineffectiveness recognized in earnings before tax

$
1,310

$
448

$
2,018

$
64


	Location and Amount of Gain Recognized in
	Income on Cash Flow and Fair Value Hedging Relationships
	for the Six Months Ended June 30,
		2020						2019
	Revenue		Cost of ‎Goods Sold		Income (Loss) from Discontinued Operations, Net of Income Taxes		Revenue		Cost of ‎Goods Sold		Income (Loss) from Discontinued Operations, Net of Income Taxes
Gain (loss) on cash flow hedging relationships:

Commodity contracts:
Amount of gain (loss) reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income into income	$	8,824	$	(2,901)	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	(17,903)

Gain (loss) on fair value hedging relationships:

Commodity contracts:
Hedged item		-		(7,929)		-		-		(831)		-
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments		-		8,600		-		-		4,431		-

Total amounts of income and expense line items presented in the statement of operations in which the effects of cash flow or fair value hedges are recorded	$	8,824	$	(2,230)	$	-	$	-	$	3,600	$	(17,903)

There were no0 gains or losses from discontinuing cash flow or fair value hedge treatment during the ~~three~~June 30, 2020 and ~~nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016.~~2019.

The open commodity derivative positions as of ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017,~~2020, are as follows (in thousands):



	Exchange Traded ⁽¹⁾		Non-Exchange Traded ⁽²⁾
Derivative ‎Instruments	Net Long & ‎(Short)		Long	(Short)	Unit of ‎Measure	Commodity
Futures	4,925				Bushels	Corn and Soybeans
Futures	(1,530)	⁽³⁾			Bushels	Corn
Futures	(20,160)				Gallons	Ethanol
Futures	(21,602)				MmBTU	Natural Gas
Futures	(6,965)	⁽³⁾			MmBTU	Natural Gas
Futures	25				Tons	Soybean Meal
Options	39				Tons	Soybean Meal
Options	11,404				Bushels	Corn
Options	(6,019)				Gallons	Ethanol
Options	987				MmBTU	Natural Gas
Forwards			19,609	(346)	Bushels	Corn and Soybeans
Forwards			11,109	(212,783)	Gallons	Ethanol
Forwards			117	(348)	Tons	DDG
Forwards			18,144	(67,795)	Pounds	Corn Oil
Forwards			4,240	(68)	MmBTU	Natural Gas

(1)Exchange traded futures and options are presented on a net long and (short) position basis. Options are presented on a delta-adjusted basis.

September 30, 2017

Exchange Traded

Non-Exchange Traded

Derivative
Instruments

Net Long &
(Short) (1)

Long (2)

(Short) (2)

Unit of
Measure

Commodity

Futures

(39,030)

Bushels

Corn, Soybeans and Wheat
Futures

67,775
(3)

Bushels

Corn
Futures

(13,175)
(4)

Bushels

Corn
Futures

9,828

Gallons

Ethanol
Futures

(285,852)
(3)

Gallons

Ethanol
Futures

1,745

MmBTU

Natural Gas
Futures

(13,753)
(4)

MmBTU

Natural Gas
Futures

(7,200)

Pounds

Livestock
Futures

(336,300)
(3)

Pounds

Livestock
Futures

40

Barrels

Crude Oil
Futures

(293)
(4)

Barrels

Crude Oil
Futures

(420)

Pounds

Soybean Oil
Futures

5,838
(3)

Gallons

Natural Gasoline
Options

(1,010)

Bushels

Corn, Soybeans and Wheat
Options

2,156

Gallons

Ethanol
Options

(3,456)

Pounds

Livestock
Options

(1,032)

Pounds

Soybean Oil
Options

29

Barrels

Crude Oil
Forwards

17,166

(247)

Bushels

Corn and Soybeans
Forwards

53,872

(336,067)

Gallons

Ethanol
Forwards

173

(375)

Tons

Distillers Grains
Forwards

14,367

(92,344)

Pounds

Corn Oil
Forwards

14,862

(1,036)

MmBTU

Natural Gasoline
Forwards

712

(412)

Barrels

Crude Oil

(2)Non-exchange traded forwards are presented on a gross long and (short) position basis including both fixed-price and basis contracts.

(3)Exchange traded futures used for fair value hedges.

~~(1)~~

~~Exchange traded futures and options are presented on a net long and (short) position basis. Options are presented on a delta-adjusted basis.~~

~~(2)~~

~~Non-exchange traded forwards are presented on a gross long and (short) position basis including both fixed-price and basis contracts.~~

Table of Contents

~~(3)~~

~~Futures used for cash flow hedges.~~

~~(4)~~

~~Futures or non-exchange traded forwards used for fair~~ ~~value~~ ~~hedges.~~

Energy trading contracts that do not involve physical delivery are presented net in revenues on the consolidated statements of operations. Included in revenues are net losses on energy trading contracts of $0.1 million and net gains on energy trading contracts of ~~$3.1 million and $18.3~~$3.0 million for the three and ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017,~~2020, respectively, and net gains on energy trading contracts of ~~$2.7~~$0.8 million and ~~$5.7~~$9.3 million for the three and ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016, respectively.~~ 2019, respectively,

9. DEBT

~~8. DEBT~~

The components of long-term debt are as follows (in thousands):


	June 30, 2020		December 31, 2019
Corporate:
$170.0 million convertible notes due 2022 ⁽¹⁾	$	152,765	$	149,256
$115.0 million convertible notes due 2024 ⁽²⁾		86,228		83,497
Green Plains Partners:
$135.0 million credit facility ⁽³⁾		130,000		132,100
Other		16,152		16,512
Total book value of long-term debt		385,145		381,365
Unamortized debt issuance costs		(7,279)		(4,820)
Less: current maturities of long-term debt		(36,647)		(132,555)
Total long-term debt	$	341,219	$	243,990

(1)Includes $1.7 million and $2.0 million of unamortized debt issuance costs as of June 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019, respectively.

September 30,
2017

December 31,
2016
Corporate:

$500.0 million term loan
$
487,440

$
-
$120.0 million convertible notes due 2018

60,241

108,817
$170.0 million convertible notes due 2022

131,752

127,239
Green Plains Partners:

$155.0 million revolving credit facility

129,000

129,000
Green Plains Processing:

$345.0 million term loan

-

294,011
Fleischmann's Vinegar:

$130.0 million term loan

-

125,609
$15.0 million revolving credit facility

-

4,000
Other

27,976

28,993
Total long-term debt

836,409

817,669
Less: current portion of long-term debt

(6,486)

(35,059)
Long-term debt
$
829,923

$
782,610

(2)Includes $2.5 million and $2.8 million of unamortized debt issuance costs as of June 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019, respectively.

~~Short-term~~(3)The Green Plains Partners revolving credit facility was amended on June 4, 2020 and includes $3.1 million of unamortized debt issuance costs as of June 30, 2020. See below for further discussion.

The components of short-term notes payable and other borrowings at September 30, 2017, include working capital revolvers at Green Plains Cattle, Green Plains Grain and Green Plains Trade with outstanding balances of $246.7 million, $64.0 million and $143.3 million, respectively. Green Plains Grain also had $3.7 million in outstanding short-term inventory financing arrangements at September 30, 2017. Short-term notes payable and other borrowings at December 31, 2016, include working capital revolvers at Green Plains Cattle, Green Plains Grain and Green Plains Trade with outstanding balances of $63.5 million, $102.0 million and $125.7 million, respectively.are as follows:


	June 30, 2020		December 31, 2019
Green Plains Trade:
$300.0 million revolver	$	50,241	$	138,204
Green Plains Grain:
$100.0 million revolver		60,800		40,000
$50.0 million inventory financing		9,475		-
Green Plains Commodity Management:
$30.0 million hedge line		10,909		9,608
	$	131,425	$	187,812

Corporate Activities

During 2019, the company issued an aggregate $115.0 million of 4.00% convertible senior notes due in 2024, or the 4.00% notes. The 4.00% notes are senior, unsecured obligations of the company, with interest payable on January 1 and July 1 of each year, beginning January 1, 2020, at a rate of 4.00% per annum. The 4.00% notes will mature on July 1, 2024, unless earlier converted, redeemed or repurchased. The 4.00% notes will be convertible, at the option of the holders, into consideration consisting of, at the company’s election, cash, shares of the company’s common stock, or a combination of cash and shares of the company’s common stock until the close of business on the scheduled trading day immediately preceding the maturity date. However, before January 1, 2024, the 4.00% notes will not be convertible unless certain conditions are satisfied. The initial conversion rate is 64.1540 shares of common stock per $1,000 of principal, which is equal to a conversion price of approximately $15.59 per share. The conversion rate will be subject to adjustment upon the occurrence of certain events. In addition, the company may be obligated to increase the conversion rate for any conversion that occurs in connection with certain corporate events, including the company’s calling the 4.00% notes for redemption.

On and after July 1, 2022, and prior to the maturity date, the company may redeem all, but not less than all, of the 4.00% notes for cash if the sale price of the company’s common stock equals or exceeds 140% of the applicable conversion price for a specified time period ending on the trading day immediately prior to the date the company delivers notice of the redemption. The redemption price will equal 100% of the principal amount of the 4.00% notes to be redeemed, plus any accrued and unpaid interest to, but excluding, the redemption date. In addition, upon the occurrence of a fundamental change, holders of the 4.00% notes will have the right, at their option, to require the company to repurchase the 4.00% notes in cash

at a price equal to 100% of the principal amount of the 4.00% notes to be repurchased, plus accrued and unpaid interest to, but excluding, the fundamental change repurchase date.

In August 2016, the company issued $170.0 million of 4.125% convertible senior notes due ~~2022.~~in 2022, or the 4.125% notes. The 4.125% notes are senior, unsecured obligations of the company, with interest payable on March 1 and September 1 of each year. The company may settle the 4.125% notes in cash, common stock or a combination of cash and common stock.

Prior to March 1, 2022, the 4.125% notes are not convertible unless certain conditions are satisfied. ~~The conversion rate is subject to adjustment upon the occurrence of certain events, including when the quarterly cash dividend exceeds $0.12 per share and upon redemption of the 4.125% notes.~~ The initial conversion rate is 35.7143 shares of common stock per $1,000 of principal, which is equal to a conversion price of approximately $28.00 per share. The conversion rate is subject to adjustment upon the occurrence of certain events, including upon redemption of the 4.125% notes.

The company may redeem all, but not less than all, of the 4.125% notes at any time on or after September 1, 2020, if the company’s common stock equals or exceeds 140% of the applicable conversion price for a specified time period ending on the trading day immediately prior to the date the company delivers notice of the redemption. The redemption price will equal 100% of the principal plus any accrued and unpaid interest. Holders of the 4.125% notes have the option to require the company to repurchase the 4.125% notes in cash at a price equal to 100% of the principal plus accrued and unpaid interest when there is a fundamental change, such as change in control. If an event of default occurs, it could result in the 4.125% notes being declared due and payable.

In September 2013, the company issued $120.0 million of 3.25% convertible senior notes due October 1, 2018. The 3.25% notes are senior, unsecured obligations of the company, with interest payable on April 1 and October 1 of each year. The company may settle the 3.25% notes in cash, common stock or a combination of cash and common stock.

Prior to April 1, 2018, the 3.25% notes are not convertible unless certain conditions are satisfied. The conversion rate is subject to adjustment when the quarterly cash dividend exceeds $0.04 per share. The conversion rate was recently adjusted to 49.9981 shares of common stock per $1,000 of principal, which is equal to a conversion price of approximately $20.00 per share. The company may be obligated to increase the conversion rate in certain events, including ~~redemption of the 3.25% notes.~~

The company may redeem all of the 3.25% notes at any time, if the company’s common stock equals or exceeds 140% of the applicable conversion price for a specified time period ending on the trading day immediately prior to the date the company delivers notice of the redemption. The redemption price will equal 100% of the principal plus any accrued and unpaid interest. Holders of the 3.25% notes have the option to require the company to repurchase the 3.25% notes in cash at a price equal to 100% of the principal plus accrued and unpaid interest when there is a fundamental change, such as change in control. If an event of default occurs, it could result in the 3.25% notes being declared due and payable.

During the second quarter of 2017, the company entered into several privately negotiated agreements with holders, on behalf of certain beneficial owners of the company’s 3.25% notes. Under these agreements, 2,783,725 shares of the company’s common stock and approximately $8.5 million in cash plus accrued but unpaid interest on the 3.25% notes, were exchanged for approximately $56.3 million in aggregate principal amount of the 3.25% notes. Common stock held as treasury shares were exchanged for the 3.25% notes. Following the closings of the agreements, $63.7 million aggregate principal amount of the 3.25% notes remain outstanding.

At issuance, the company separately accounted for the liability and equity components of the convertible notes by bifurcating the gross proceeds between the indebtedness, or liability component, and the embedded conversion option, or equity component. This bifurcation was done by estimating an effective interest rate on the date of issuance for similar notes. The embedded conversion option was recorded in stockholders’ equity. Since the company did not exercise the embedded conversion option associated with the notes, pursuant to the guidance within ASC Topic 470, ~~Debt~~, the company recorded a loss upon extinguishment measured by the difference between the fair value and carrying value of the liability portion of the notes. As a result, the company recorded a charge to interest expense in the consolidated financial statements of approximately $1.3 million during the three months ended June 30, 2017. This charge included $0.6 million of unamortized debt issuance costs related to the principal balance extinguished. The remaining settlement consideration transferred was allocated to the reacquisition of the embedded conversion option and recognized as a reduction of additional paid-in capital.

On August 29, 2017, the company entered into a $500.0 million term loan agreement, which matures on August 29, 2023, to refinance approximately $405.0 million of total debt outstanding issued by Green Plains Processing and Fleischmann’s Vinegar Company, pay associated fees and expenses and for general corporate purposes. The term loan is guaranteed by the company and substantially all of its subsidiaries, but not Green Plains Partners and certain other entities, and secured by substantially all of the assets of the company, including 17 ethanol production facilities, vinegar production facilities and a second priority lien on the assets secured under the revolving credit facilities at Green Plains Trade, Green Plains Cattle and Green Plains Grain.

The credit agreement contains certain customary representations and warranties, affirmative covenants, negative covenants, financial covenants and events of default. The negative covenants include restrictions on the ability to incur additional indebtedness, acquire and sell assets, create liens, make investments, make distributions and enter into transactions with affiliates. At the end of each fiscal quarter, the covenants of the credit agreement require the company to maintain a maximum term debt to total term capitalization of not more than 55% and a minimum interest coverage ratio of not less than 1.25x, as defined in the credit agreement. Beginning in 2018, the credit facility also has a provision requiring the company to make special annual payments of 50% or 75% of its available free cash flow, subject to certain limitations. Voluntary term loan prepayments are subject to prepayment fees of 1.0% if prepaid before the eighteen month anniversary of the credit agreement. Beginning in the fourth quarter of 2017, scheduled principal payments are $1.25 million until maturity. The term loan bears interest at a floating rate of a base rate plus a margin of 4.50% or LIBOR plus a margin of 5.50%.

Ethanol Production Segment

~~Green Plains Processing had a $345.0 million senior secured credit facility, which was guaranteed by the~~The company has small equipment financing loans, finance leases on equipment or facilities, and ~~certain subsidiaries~~other forms of Green Plains Processing and secured by the stock and substantially all of the assets of Green Plains Processing. The interest rate was LIBOR, subject to a 1.00% floor, plus 5.50% and was scheduled to mature on June 30, 2020. The terms of the credit facility required the borrower to maintain a maximum total leverage ratio of 4.00x at the end of each quarter, decreasing to 3.25x over the life of the credit facility, and a minimum fixed charge coverage ratio of 1.25x. This senior secured credit facility was extinguished in full on August 29, 2017 with the proceeds from the new $500.0 million secured term loan facility. In connection with the extinguishment of the senior secured credit facility, the company wrote off deferred financing fees of $5.9 million which were recorded as interest expense in the consolidated statement of operations during the three months ended September 30, 2017.debt financing.

Agribusiness and Energy Services Segment

Green Plains ~~Grain~~Trade has a ~~$125.0~~$300.0 million senior secured asset-based revolving credit facility to finance working capital for marketing and distribution activities based on eligible collateral equal to the sum of percentages of eligible receivables and inventories, less miscellaneous adjustments. The credit facility matures on July 28, 2022 and consists of a $285 million credit facility and a $15 million first-in-last-out (FILO) credit facility, and includes an accordion feature that enables the credit facility to be increased by up to $70.0 million with agent approval. Advances are subject to variable interest rates equal to daily LIBOR plus 2.25% on the credit facility and daily LIBOR plus 3.25% on the FILO credit facility. The total unused portion of the revolving credit facility is also subject to a commitment fee of 0.375% per annum.

The terms impose affirmative and negative covenants for Green Plains Trade, including maintaining a minimum fixed charge coverage ratio of 1.15 to 1.00. Capital expenditures are limited to $1.5 million per year under the credit facility. The credit facility also restricts distributions related to capital stock, with an exception for distributions up to 50% of net income if, on a pro forma basis, (a) availability has been greater than $10.0 million for the last 30 days and (b) the borrower would be in compliance with the fixed charge coverage ratio on the distribution date.

Green Plains Grain has a $100.0 million senior secured asset-based revolving credit facility, which matures on June 28, 2022. The credit facility finances working capital up to the maximum commitment based on eligible collateral equal to the sum of percentages of eligible cash, receivables and inventories, less miscellaneous adjustments. ~~The credit facility matures on July 26, 2019.~~ Advances are subject to an interest rate equal to LIBOR plus 3.00% or the lenders’ base rate plus 2.00%. The credit facility also includes an accordion feature that enables the facility to be increased by up to $75.0 million with agent approval. The credit facility can also be increased by up to $50.0 million for seasonal borrowings. Total commitments outstanding cannot exceed ~~$250.0~~$225.0 million. Depending on utilization, the total unused portion of the $100.0 million revolving credit facility is also subject to a commitment fee ranging from 0.375% to 0.50%.

Lenders receive a first priority lien on certain cash, inventory, accounts receivable and other assets owned by Green Plains ~~Grain as security on the credit facility.~~Grain. The terms impose affirmative and negative covenants for Green Plains Grain, including maintaining minimum working capital to be the greater of ~~$20.0 million~~ (i) $18,000,000 and (ii) 18% of the sum of the then total commitment plus the aggregate seasonal line commitments. Minimum tangible net worth is required to be greater than 21% of ~~$26.3 million for 2017.~~the sum of the then total commitment plus the aggregate seasonal line commitments. The credit facility also requires the company to maintain a maximum annual leverage of 6.00 to 1.00. Capital expenditures are limited to $8.0 million per year under the credit facility, plus equity contributions from the company and unused amounts of up to $8.0 million from the previous year. In addition, if

the company has long-term indebtedness on the date of calculation of greater than $10.0 million, the credit facility requires the company to maintain a minimum fixed charge coverage ratio of 1.25 to 1.00 and a maximum ~~annual leverage ratio~~long term debt capitalization of ~~6.00 to 1.00 at the end of each quarter. The fixed charge coverage ratio and long-term capitalization ratio apply only if~~ 40%.

Green Plains Grain has ~~long-term indebtedness on~~entered into short-term inventory financing agreements with a financial institution. At June 30, 2020, 2.3 million bushels of corn had been designated as collateral under these agreements at initial values totaling $9.0 million. The company has accounted for the ~~date~~agreements as short-term notes, rather than sales, and has elected the fair value option to offset fluctuations in market prices of ~~calculation. As of September~~the inventory. At June 30, ~~2017,~~ 2020, the short-term notes payable were valued at $9.5 million and were measured using Level 2 inputs.

Green Plains Grain had no long-term indebtedness. The credit facility also contains restrictions on distributions related to capital stock, with exceptions for distributions up to 50% of net profit before tax, subject to certain conditions.

~~Green Plains Trade~~Commodity Management has ~~a senior secured asset-based~~an uncommitted $30.0 million revolving credit facility which ~~was amended on July 28, 2017,~~matures April 30, 2023 to increase the maximum commitment from $150 million to $300 million and extend the maturity date to July 28, 2022. The revolving credit facility finances working capital for marketing and distribution activities based on eligible collateral equal to the sum of percentages of eligible receivables and inventories, less miscellaneous adjustments. The amended $300 million maximum commitment consists of a $285 million credit facility and a $15 million first-in-last-out (FILO) credit facility. The amended credit facility also includes an accordion feature that enables the credit facility to be increased by up to $70.0 million with agent approval. Advances are subject to variable interest rates equal to daily LIBOR plus 2.25% on the credit facility and daily LIBOR plus 3.25% on the FILO credit facility. The total unused portion of the $300 million revolving credit facility is also subject to a commitment fee of 0.375% per annum.

The terms impose affirmative and negative covenants, including maintaining a fixed charge coverage ratio of 1.15x. Capital expenditures are limited to $1.5 million per year under the credit facility. The credit facility also restricts distributionsfinance margins related to capital stock, with an exception for distributions up to 50% of net income if, on a pro forma basis, (a) availability has been greater than $10.0 million for the last 30 days and (b) the borrower would be in compliance with the fixed charge coverage ratio on the distribution date.

~~At September 30, 2017, Green Plains Trade had restricted cash~~ ~~of $9.5 million~~ ~~on the~~ ~~consolidated balance sheet, the use of which was restricted for repayment towards the outstanding loan balance.~~

~~Food and Ingredients Segment~~

~~Green Plains Cattle has a $300.0 million senior secured asset-based revolving credit facility,~~ ~~which matures on April 30, 2020, to finance working capital for the cattle feedlot operations~~ ~~up to the maximum commitment based on eligible collateral equal to the sum of percentages of eligible receivables, inventories and other current assets, less miscellaneous adjustments.~~its hedging programs. Advances ~~as amended,~~ are subject to variable interest rates equal to LIBOR plus ~~2.00%~~1.75%.

Partnership Segment

Green Plains Partners has a $135.0 million credit facility to ~~3.00%, or~~fund working capital, capital expenditures and other general partnership purposes. The credit facility was amended on June 4, 2020, decreasing the ~~base rate plus 1.00%~~amount available under the facility from $200.0 million to ~~2.00%, depending upon the preceding three months’ excess borrowing availability.~~ $135.0 million. The amended credit facility includes a $130.0 million term loan and a $5.0 million revolver, and matures on December 31, 2021. The term loan requires a principal payment of $7.5 million on July 15, 2020 and $2.5 million in monthly principal payments beginning August 15, 2020, with a step up to monthly payments of $3.2 million beginning May 15, 2021. In addition, if at any time subsequent to July 15, 2020, the partnership’s cash balance exceeds $2.5 million for more than 5 consecutive business days, prepayments of outstanding principal are required in an amount equal to the excess cash. The partnership is also ~~includes an accordion feature that enables~~required to prepay outstanding principal on the credit facility with 100% of net cash proceeds from any asset disposition or recovery event. Any prepayments on the term loan are applied to ~~be increased by up~~the remaining principal balance in inverse order of maturity, including the final payment.

The term loan balance, and any advances on the revolver, are subject to ~~$100.0 million with agent approval.~~a floating interest rate based on a 1.0% LIBOR floor plus 4.50% to 5.25% dependent upon the preceding fiscal quarter’s consolidated leverage ratio. The unused portion of the ~~credit facility~~revolver is also subject to a commitment fee of ~~0.20% to 0.30% per annum, depending on the preceding three months’ excess borrowing availability.~~

Lenders receive a first priority lien on certain cash, inventory, accounts receivable, property and equipment and other assets owned by Green Plains Cattle as security on the credit facility. The amended terms impose affirmative and negative covenants, including maintaining working capital0.50%. As of 15% of the commitment amount, tangible net worth of 20% of the commitment amount, plus 50% of net profit from the previous year, and a total debt to tangible net worth ratio of 3.50x. Capital expenditures are limited to $10.0 million per year under the credit facility, plus $10.0 million per year if funded by a contribution from parent, plus any unused amounts from the previous year.

Fleischmann’s Vinegar had a $130.0 million senior secured term loan and a $15.0 million senior secured revolving credit facility, which was used to finance the purchase of Fleischmann’s Vinegar and to fund working capital for its vinegar

~~manufacturing operations, and were scheduled to mature on October 3, 2022. Beginning January 1, 2017,~~June 30, 2020, the term loan had a balance of $130.0 million and an interest rate of 6.25% and the revolver was unused.

The credit facility also allows for swing line loans subject to ~~mandatory prepayments based on~~ the preceding fiscal year’s excess cash flow. Term loan prepayments were generally subject to prepayment fees of 1.0% to 2.0% if prepaid before the second anniversary of the credit agreement. The term loan andrevolver availability. Swing line loans under the revolving credit facility each bore interest at a floating rate based on the consolidated total net leverage ratio, adjusted quarterly beginning September 30, 2017, to either a base rate plus an applicable margin of 5.0% to 6.0% or to LIBOR plus an applicable margin of 6.0% to 7.0%. The unused portion of the revolving credit facility was also subject to a commitment fee of 0.5% per annum.

This senior secured credit term loan and senior secured revolving credit facility were extinguished in full on August 29, 2017 with the proceeds from the new $500.0 million secured term loan facility. In connection with the extinguishment of the senior secured credit facility, the company wrote off deferred financing fees of $3.5 million and paid a prepayment penalty of $2.9 million. These expenses are recorded as interest expense in the consolidated statement of operations during the three months ended September 30, 2017.

~~Partnership Segment~~

Green Plains Partners, through a wholly owned subsidiary, has a $155.0 million revolving credit facility, as amended, which matures on July 1, 2020, to fund working capital, acquisitions, distributions, capital expenditures and other general partnership purposes. Advances under the credit facility are subject to a floating interest rate based on the ~~preceding fiscal quarter’s consolidated leverage ratio at a base rate~~Prime Rate plus ~~1.25%~~3.5% to 2.00% or LIBOR plus 2.25% to 3.00%. The credit facility may be increased up to $100.0 million without the consent of the lenders. The unused portion of the credit facility is also subject to a commitment fee of 0.35% to 0.50%, depending on4.25% dependent upon the preceding fiscal quarter’s consolidated leverage ratio. As of June 30, 2020, there were 0 outstanding swing line loans.

The partnership’s obligations under the credit facility are secured by a first priority lien on (i) the ~~capital stock~~equity interests of the partnership’s present and future subsidiaries, (ii) all of the partnership’s present and future personal property, such as investment property, general intangibles and contract rights, including rights under any agreements with Green Plains Trade, and (iii) all proceeds and products of the equity interests of the partnership’s present and future subsidiaries and its personal property and (iv) substantially all of the partnership’s real property and material leases of real property. The terms impose affirmative and negative covenants, including ~~restricting~~restrictions on the partnership’s ability to incur additional debt, acquire and sell assets, create liens, invest capital, pay distributions and materially amend the partnership’s commercial agreements with Green Plains Trade. The credit facility also requires the partnership to maintain a maximum consolidated ~~net~~ leverage ratio, as of the end of any fiscal quarter, of no more than ~~3.50x,~~3.0x that decreases 0.25x each quarter to 1.50x by December 31, 2021, and a minimum consolidated ~~interest~~debt service coverage ratio of ~~no less than 2.75x,~~1.1x, each of which is calculated on a pro forma basis with respect to acquisitions and divestitures occurring during the applicable period. The consolidated leverage ratio is calculated by dividing total funded indebtedness by the sum of the four preceding fiscal quarters’ consolidated EBITDA. The consolidated debt service coverage ratio is calculated by taking the sum of the four preceding fiscal quarters’ consolidated EBITDA minus income taxes and consolidated capital expenditures for such period divided by the sum of the four preceding fiscal quarters’ consolidated interest charges plus consolidated scheduled funded debt payments for such period.

Under the amended terms of the credit facility, the partnership may make quarterly distribution payments in an aggregate amount not to exceed $0.12 per outstanding unit, so long as (i) no default has occurred and is continuing, or would result from payment of the distribution, and (ii) the partnership and its subsidiaries are in compliance with its financial covenants and remain in compliance after payment of the distribution.

‎

Covenant Compliance

The company was in compliance with its debt covenants as of ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017.~~2020.

~~Capitalized Interest~~

~~The~~ ~~compa~~ny ~~had $16 thousand and $39 thousand~~ of capitalized interest during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017, respectively, and $483 thousand and $1.4 million during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016, respectively.

Restricted Net Assets

At ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017,~~2020, there were approximately ~~$124.5~~$66.4 million of net assets at the company’s subsidiaries that could not be transferred to the parent company in the form of dividends, loans or advances due to restrictions contained in the credit facilities of these subsidiaries.

9.10. STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION

The company ~~has an equity incentive plan that reserves 4,110,000~~had a 2009 Equity Incentive Plan which reserved a total of 4.1 million shares of common stock for issuance pursuant to ~~its directors and employees. The plan provides~~the plan. On May 6, 2020, the shareholders of the company approved the 2019 Equity Incentive Plan which granted an additional 1.6 million shares for ~~shares,~~stock-based compensation, including options to purchase shares of common stock, stock appreciation rights tied to the value of common stock, restricted stock, ~~and~~ restricted ~~and deferred~~ stock unit awards ~~to be granted~~and performance share awards to eligible employees, non-employee directors and consultants. All shares remaining under the 2009 Equity Incentive Plan rolled into the 2019 Equity Incentive Plan effective May 6, 2020.The company measures stock-based compensation at fair value on the grant ~~date.~~date, with no adjustments for estimated forfeitures. The company records noncash compensation expense related to equity awards in its consolidated financial statements over the requisite period on a straight-line basis. ~~Substantially all~~

Restricted Stock Awards and Deferred Stock Units

The non-vested stock award and deferred stock unit activity for the six months ended June 30, 2020, is as follows:


	Non-Vested ‎ Shares and ‎ Deferred Stock ‎Units	Weighted- ‎Average Grant- ‎Date Fair Value		Weighted-Average ‎ Remaining ‎ Vesting Term ‎(in years)
Non-Vested at December 31, 2019	751,315	$	17.48
Granted	645,827		9.75
Forfeited	(20,301)		16.26
Vested	(352,080)		18.83
Non-Vested at June 30, 2020	1,024,761	$	12.17	2.0

Performance Shares

On March 18, 2020, the board of directors granted performance shares to be awarded in the form of common stock to certain participants of the ~~existing stock-based compensation has been equity awards.~~plan. These performance shares vest based on the level of achievement of certain performance goals, including the incremental value achieved from the company’s high-protein initiatives, annual production levels and return on investment (ROI). The performance shares were granted at a target of 100%, but each performance share will reduce or increase depending on results for the performance period. If the company achieves the maximum performance goals, the maximum amount of shares available to be issued pursuant to the 2020 awards are 641,823 performance shares which represents approximately 276% of the 232,566 performance shares which remain outstanding. The actual number of performance shares that will ultimately vest is based on the actual performance targets achieved at the end of the performance period.

On February 19, 2019 and March 19, 2018, the board of directors granted performance shares to be awarded in the form of common stock to certain participants of the plan. These performance shares vest based on the company’s average return on net assets (RONA) and the company’s total shareholder return (TSR), as further described herein. The performance shares vest on the third anniversary of the grant, if the RONA and TSR criteria are achieved and the participant is then employed by the company. NaN percent of the performance shares vest based upon the company’s ability to achieve a predetermined RONA during the three year performance period. The remaining 50 percent of the performance shares vest based upon the company’s total TSR during the three year performance period relative to that of the company’s performance peer group.

The performance shares were granted at a target of 100%, but each performance share will reduce or increase depending on results for the performance period for the company's RONA, and the company’s TSR relative to that of the performance peer group. If the company’s RONA and TSR achieve the maximum goals, the maximum amount of shares available to be

issued pursuant to the 2018 and 2019 awards are 428,104 performance shares or 150% of the 285,403 performance shares which remain outstanding. The actual number of performance shares that will ultimately vest is based on the actual percentile ranking of the company’s RONA, and the company’s TSR compared to the peer performance at the end of the performance period.

The company used the Monte Carlo valuation model to estimate the fair value of the performance shares on the date of the grant. The weighted average assumptions used by the company in applying the Monte Carlo valuation model for performance share grants are illustrated in the following table:


	FY 2019 Performance Awards			FY 2018 Performance Awards
Risk-free interest rate		2.45	%		2.44	%
Dividend yield		3.13	%		2.64	%
Expected volatility		41.69	%		45.11	%
Monte Carlo valuation		99.62	%		97.39	%
Closing stock price on the date of grant	$	15.34		$	18.15

The non-vested performance share award activity for the six months ended June 30, 2020, is as follows:

The non-vested unit-based awards activity for the ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017,~~2020, is as follows:

Non-Vested
Shares and
Deferred Stock
Units

Weighted-
Average Grant-
Date Fair Value

Weighted-Average
Remaining
Vesting Term
(in years)

Non-Vested at December 31, 2016
15,009

$
15.99

Granted
12,834

18.70

Forfeited
(4,278)

18.70

Vested
(15,009)

15.99

Non-Vested at September 30, 2017
8,556

$
18.70

0.8


	Non-Vested ‎ Shares and ‎ Deferred Stock ‎Units	Weighted- ‎Average Grant- ‎Date Fair Value		Weighted-Average ‎ Remaining ‎ Vesting Term ‎(in years)
Non-Vested at December 31, 2019	22,856	$	14.00
Vested	(22,856)		14.00
Non-Vested at June 30, 2020	-	$	-	0.0

Stock-Based and Unit Based Compensation Expense

Compensation costs for stock-based and unit-based payment plans ~~during~~were $2.3 million and $3.6 million for the three and ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017, were approximately $3.3~~2020, respectively, and $2.3 million and ~~$8.8~~$4.8 million ~~respectively, and $2.4 million and $7.0 million during~~for the three and ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016, respectively.~~2019. At ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017,~~2020, there was ~~$16.2~~$13.6 million of

unrecognized compensation costs from stock-based and unit-based compensation related to non-vested awards. This compensation is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of approximately 2.0 years. The ~~potential~~ potential tax benefit related to stock-based payment is approximately ~~37.7%~~24.2% of these ~~expenses.~~expenses.

~~10.~~11. EARNINGS PER SHARE

Basic earnings per share, or EPS, is calculated by dividing net income available to common stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period.

During 2016, diluted EPS was computed using the treasury stock method for the convertible debt instruments, by dividing net income by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period, adjusted for the dilutive effect of the convertible debt instruments and any other outstanding dilutive securities. During the first quarter of 2017, the company changed its method for calculating dilutive EPS related to its convertible debt instruments from the treasury stock method to the if-converted method, as the company changed its financial strategy with respect to cash settlement of these instruments. As such, theThe company computed diluted EPS ~~for 2017~~ by dividing net income on an if-converted basis, adjusted to add back net interest expense related to the convertible debt instruments, by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period, adjusted to include the shares that would be issued if the convertible debt instruments were converted to common shares and the effect of any outstanding dilutive securities. In addition, due to the presentation of GPCC as discontinued operations, the company has presented basic and diluted earnings per share from both continuing operations and from discontinued operations.

The basic and diluted EPS are calculated as follows (in ~~thousands)~~thousands, except per share amounts):

Three Months Ended
September 30,

Nine Months Ended
September 30,

2017

2016

2017

2016
Basic EPS:

Net income (loss) attributable to Green Plains
$
34,394

$
7,928

$
14,431

$
(8,019)
Weighted average shares outstanding - basic

41,348

38,282

40,008

38,301
EPS - basic
$
0.83

$
0.21

$
0.36

$
(0.21)

Diluted EPS:

Net income (loss) attributable to Green Plains
$
34,394

$
7,928

$
14,431

$
(8,019)
Interest and amortization on convertible debt, net of tax effect:

3.25% notes

840

-

3,582

-
4.125% notes

2,050

-

6,089

-
Net income (loss) attributable to Green Plains - diluted
$
37,284

$
7,928

$
24,102

$
(8,019)

Weighted average shares outstanding - basic

41,348

38,282

40,008

38,301
Effect of dilutive convertible debt:

3.25% notes

3,178

760

4,551

-
4.125% notes

6,071

-

6,071

-
Effect of dilutive stock-based compensation awards

50

94

63

-
Weighted average shares outstanding - diluted

50,647

39,136

50,693

38,301

EPS - diluted
$
0.74

$
0.20

$
0.48

$
(0.21)


	Three Months Ended ‎June 30,				Six Months Ended ‎June 30,
	2020		2019		2020		2019
Numerator:
Net loss from continuing operations ⁽¹⁾	$	(8,214)	$	(47,281)	$	(24,659)	$	(85,611)
Net income (loss) from discontinued operations		-		1,939		-		(2,530)
Net loss attributable to Green Plains	$	(8,214)	$	(45,342)	$	(24,659)	$	(88,141)

Denominator:
Weighted-average shares outstanding - basic		34,603		40,081		34,634		40,200
Dilutive effect of convertible debt and stock-based compensation ⁽²⁾		-		-		-		-
Weighted-average shares outstanding - diluted		34,603		40,081		34,634		40,200

EPS - basic and diluted:
EPS from continuing operations	$	(0.24)	$	(1.18)	$	(0.71)	$	(2.13)
EPS from discontinued operations		-		0.05		-		(0.06)
EPS	$	(0.24)	$	(1.13)	$	(0.71)	$	(2.19)

Anti-dilutive weighted-average convertible debt and stock-based compensation⁽²⁾		14,074		7,404		13,994		7,041

~~For~~(1)Net loss from continuing operations can be recalculated from our consolidated statements of operations by taking the ~~nine months ended September 30, 2016, 10~~8 ~~thousand shares~~net loss from continuing operations including noncontrolling interest less net income attributable to noncontrolling interests.

(2)The effect related to the company’s convertible debt and stock-based compensation awards ~~and convertible debt were~~have been excluded from ~~the computation of~~ diluted EPS for the periods presented as the inclusion of these shares would have been antidilutive.

Table of Contents

~~11.~~12. STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

Components of stockholders’ equity for the three and six months ended June 30, 2020 and 2019 are as follows (in thousands):


								Accum.					Total
				Additional				Other					Green Plains		Non-		Total
	Common Stock			Paid-in		Retained		Comp.		Treasury Stock			Stockholders'		Controlling		Stockholders'
	Shares	Amount		Capital		Earnings		Income		Shares	Amount		Equity		Interests		Equity

Balance, January 1, 2020	46,964	$	47	$	734,580	$	148,150	$	(11,064)	10,932	$	(119,808)	$	751,905	$	113,381	$	865,286
Net income (loss)	-		-		-		(16,445)		-	-		-		(16,445)		6,098		(10,347)
Distributions declared	-		-		-		-		-	-		-		-		(5,498)		(5,498)
Other comprehensive loss ‎before reclassification	-		-		-		-		4,532	-		-		4,532		-		4,532
Amounts reclassified from ‎ accumulated other ‎comprehensive loss	-		-		-		-		(4,485)	-		-		(4,485)		-		(4,485)
Other comprehensive income, ‎net of tax	-		-		-		-		47	-		-		47		-		47
Share of equity method investees other comprehensive loss arising during the period, net of tax	-		-		-		-		41,956	-		-		41,956		-		41,956
Repurchase of common stock	-		-		-		-		-	881		(11,479)		(11,479)		-		(11,479)
Stock-based compensation	343		-		36		-		-	-		-		36		79		115
Balance, March 31, 2020	47,307	$	47	$	734,616	$	131,705	$	30,939	11,813	$	(131,287)	$	766,020	$	114,060	$	880,080
Net income (loss)	-		-		-		(8,214)		-	-		-		(8,214)		2,740		(5,474)
Distributions declared	-		-		-		-		-	-		-		-		(1,389)		(1,389)
Other comprehensive loss ‎before reclassification	-		-		-		-		(1,333)	-		-		(1,333)		-		(1,333)
Amounts reclassified from ‎ accumulated other ‎comprehensive loss	-		-		-		-		(7)	-		-		(7)		-		(7)
Other comprehensive income, ‎net of tax	-		-		-		-		(1,340)	-		-		(1,340)		-		(1,340)
Share of equity method investees other comprehensive loss arising during the period, net of tax	-		-		-		-		(16,759)	-		-		(16,759)		-		(16,759)
Stock-based compensation	160		-		2,072		-		-	-		-		2,072		80		2,152
Balance, June 30, 2020	47,467	$	47	$	736,688	$	123,491	$	12,840	11,813	$	(131,287)	$	741,779	$	115,491	$	857,270

‎

Table of Contents

Accum.

Total

Additional

Other

Green Plains
Non-
Total

Common Stock
Paid-in
Retained
Comp.
Treasury Stock
Stockholders'
Controlling
Stockholders'

Shares
Amount
Capital
Earnings
Loss
Shares
Amount
Equity
Interests
Equity

Balance, December 31, 2016
46,079
$
46
$
659,200
$
283,214
$
(4,137) 7,715
$
(75,816)
$
862,507
$
116,684
$
979,191
Net income
-

-

-

14,431

-
-

-

14,431

14,853

29,284
Cash dividends and
distributions declared
-

-

-

(14,053)

-
-

-

(14,053)

(15,214)

(29,267)
Other comprehensive loss
before reclassification
-

-

-

-

(9,436)
-

-

(9,436)

-

(9,436)
Amounts reclassified from
accumulated other
comprehensive loss
-

-

-

-

(34)
-

-

(34)

-

(34)
Other comprehensive loss,
net of tax
-

-

-

-

(9,470)
-

-

(9,470)

-

(9,470)
Repurchase of common stock
-

-

-

-

-
336

(5,733)

(5,733)

-

(5,733)
Exchange of 3.25%
convertible notes due
2018
-

-

18,326

-

-
(2,784)

27,356

45,682

-

45,682
Stock-based compensation
346

-

4,497

-

-
-

-

4,497

159

4,656
Stock options exercised
5

-

50

-

-
-

-

50

-

50
Balance, September 30, 2017
46,430
$
46
$
682,073
$
283,592
$
(13,607) 5,267
$
(54,193)
$
897,911
$
116,482
$
1,014,393


								Accum.					Total
				Additional				Other					Green Plains		Non-		Total
	Common Stock			Paid-in		Retained		Comp.		Treasury Stock			Stockholders'		Controlling		Stockholders'
	Shares	Amount		Capital		Earnings		Income		Shares	Amount		Equity		Interests		Equity

Balance, January 1, 2019	46,638	$	47	$	696,222	$	324,728	$	(16,016)	5,536	$	(58,162)	$	946,819	$	116,170	$	1,062,989
Net income (loss)	-		-		-		(42,799)		-	-		-		(42,799)		4,928		(37,871)
Cash dividends and ‎distributions declared	-		-		-		(4,847)		-	-		-		(4,847)		(5,487)		(10,334)
Other comprehensive loss ‎before reclassification	-		-		-		-		(6,883)	-		-		(6,883)		-		(6,883)
Amounts reclassified from ‎ accumulated other ‎comprehensive loss	-		-		-		-		10,376	-		-		10,376		-		10,376
Other comprehensive income, ‎net of tax	-		-		-		-		3,493	-		-		3,493		-		3,493
Proceeds from disgorgement of shareholders short-swing profits, net ⁽¹⁾	-		-		5,023		-		-	-		-		5,023		-		5,023
Stock-based compensation	284		-		428		-		-	-		-		428		79		507
Balance, March 31, 2019	46,922	$	47	$	701,673	$	277,082	$	(12,523)	5,536	$	(58,162)	$	908,117	$	115,690	$	1,023,807
Net income (loss)	-		-		-		(45,342)		-	-		-		(45,342)		5,163		(40,179)
Cash dividends and ‎distributions declared	-		-		-		(4,871)		-	-		-		(4,871)		(5,487)		(10,358)
Other comprehensive loss ‎before reclassification	-		-		-		-		33,260	-		-		33,260		-		33,260
Amounts reclassified from ‎ accumulated other ‎comprehensive loss	-		-		-		-		3,440	-		-		3,440		-		3,440
Other comprehensive income, ‎net of tax	-		-		-		-		36,700	-		-		36,700		-		36,700
Issuance of 4.00% convertible notes due 2024, net of tax	-		-		22,537		-		-	-		-		22,537		-		22,537
Settlement of 3.25% convertible ‎notes due 2019, net of tax	-		-		(271)		-		-	-		-		(271)		-		(271)
Repurchase of common stock	-		-		-		-		-	3,197		(39,870)		(39,870)		-		(39,870)
Stock-based compensation	(3)		-		2,129		-		-	-		-		2,129		79		2,208
Balance, June 30, 2019	46,919	$	47	$	726,068	$	226,869	$	24,177	8,733	$	(98,032)	$	879,129	$	115,445	$	994,574

(1)During the three months ended March 31, 2019, the company received $6.7 million from a shareholder of the company for disgorgement of shareholder short-swing profits under Section 16(b) under the Exchange Act. The amount was recorded as an increase to additional paid-in capital, net of tax.

‎

Table of Contents

Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income ~~(loss)~~ are as follows (in thousands):

Three Months Ended
September 30,

Nine Months Ended
September 30,

Statements of
Operations

2017

2016

2017

2016

Classification
Gains on cash flow hedges:

Commodity derivatives
$
(5,242)

$
25,254

$
1,734

$
12,029

Revenues
Commodity derivatives

(1,861)

(28,548)

(1,679)

(15,904)

Cost of goods sold
Total

(7,103)

(3,294)

55

(3,875)

Income (loss) before
income taxes
Income tax expense (benefit)

(2,650)

(1,144)

21

(1,369)

Income tax
expense (benefit)
Amounts reclassified from accumulated
other comprehensive income (loss)
$
(4,453)

$
(2,150)

$
34

$
(2,506)


	Three Months Ended ‎June 30,				Six Months Ended ‎June 30,				Statements of ‎Operations
	2020		2019		2020		2019		Classification
Gains (losses) on cash flow hedges:
Commodity derivatives	$	6	$	-	$	8,824	$	-	⁽¹⁾
Commodity derivatives		-		-		(2,901)		-	⁽²⁾
Total gains on cash flow hedges from continuing operations		6		-		5,923		-	⁽³⁾

Income (losses) on cash flow hedges from discontinued operations		-		(4,387)		-		(17,903)	⁽⁴⁾

Income tax benefit (expense)		1		-		(1,431)		-	⁽⁵⁾
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)	$	7	$	(4,387)	$	4,492	$	(17,903)

~~12.~~(1)Revenues

(2)Costs of goods sold

(3)Loss from continuing operations before income taxes and income (loss) from equity method investees

(4)Net income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of income taxes

(5)Income tax benefit

13. INCOME TAXES

The company records actual income tax expense or benefit during interim periods rather than on an annual effective tax rate method. Certain items are given discrete period treatment and the tax effect of those items are reported in full in the relevant interim period. Green Plains Partners is a limited partnership, which is treated as a flow-through entity for federal income tax purposes and is not subject to federal income taxes. As a result, the consolidated financial statements do not reflect ~~such~~ income taxes on pre-tax income or loss attributable to the noncontrolling interest in the partnership.

The ~~2017~~CARES Act was signed into law on March 27, 2020. The CARES Act includes several significant business tax provisions including elimination of the taxable limit for certain net operating losses (“NOL”), allowing businesses to carry back NOLs arising in 2018, 2019 and 2020 to the five prior tax years, accelerating refunds of previously generated corporate AMT credits, and loosening the business interest limitation under §163(j) from 30% to 50%. The CARES Act also contains an employee retention credit to encourage employers to maintain headcounts even if employees cannot report to work because of issues related to the COVID-19. In the second quarter, the company filed its preliminary 2019 federal income tax return, as well as a refund claim with the IRS to carry back our 2019 NOL to prior years. The company recorded an additional income tax benefit of approximately $5.5 million during the second quarter related to the CARES Act in addition to adjustments to certain valuation allowances. In the first quarter the company recorded an income tax benefit related to the expected NOL carry back claim of $28.4 million which was an estimate based on the amount of NOL rated to the 2019 year-end tax provision.

The company recorded income tax benefit of $11.5 million and $55.7 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2020, compared with $15.3 million and $28.3 million for the same periods in 2019.The decrease in the amount of income tax benefit recorded for the three months ended June 30, 2020 as compared to the same period in 2019 was primarily due to an increase in pretax income offset by the tax benefit for the utilization of previously recorded tax NOLs in the three month period ended June 30, 2020 as allowed under the provisions of the recently enacted CARES Act. The increase in the amount of the tax benefit recorded for the six months ended June 30, 2020 compared to the same period in 2019 was to record the tax benefit associated with the carry back of the tax NOL generated in 2019 to the 2014 tax year under the newly enacted CARES Act, as well as the release of a previously recorded valuation allowance against the 2019 NOL and other deferred tax assets. The amount of unrecognized tax benefits for uncertain tax positions was $51.6 million as of June 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019.

The 2020 effective tax rate can be affected by variances ~~among~~in the estimates and amounts of taxable income among the various states, entities and activity types, realization of tax credits, adjustments from resolution of tax matters under review, valuation allowances and the company’s assessment of its liability for uncertain tax positions.

Income tax benefit was $48.8 million and $60.9 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017, respectively, compared with income tax expense of $5.1 million and income tax benefit of $4.3 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016, respectively. The variation in tax expense was due primarily to the company’s recognition of tax benefits related to R&D Credits.

~~A study was conducted to determine whether certain activities the company performs qualify for the R&D credit allowed~~

Table of Contents

by the Internal Revenue Code Section 41. As a result of this study, the company concluded these activities do qualify for the credit and determined it was appropriate to claim the benefit of these credits for all open tax years.

During the quarter ended September 30, 2017, the company recognized a net tax benefit of $49.5 million for federal and state R&D Credits relating to tax years 2013 to 2016 as well as an estimated year-to-date tax benefit for federal and state R&D Credits for the 2017 tax year. Of this amount, $9.0 million ($5.9 million net) in refundable credits not dependent upon taxable income was recorded as a reduction of cost of goods sold and $43.6 million was recorded as an income tax benefit.

~~The amount of unrecognized tax benefits for uncertain tax~~ ~~positions was $27.3 million~~ ~~as of September 30, 2017, and $0.2 million as of December 31, 2016. Recognition of these benefits would have a favorable impact on the company’s effective tax rate.~~

~~13.~~14. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

~~Operating Leases~~Lease Expense

The company leases certain facilities, ~~equipment and~~ parcels of land, ~~under agreements that expire at various dates. For accounting purposes, rent~~and equipment, with remaining terms ranging from less than one year to 17.4 years. The land and facility leases include renewal options. The renewal options are included in the lease term only for those sites or locations in which they are reasonably certain to be renewed. Equipment renewals are not considered reasonably certain to be exercised as they typically renew with significantly different underlying terms.

The components of lease expense ~~is based on a straight-line amortization~~are as follows (in thousands):


	Three Months Ended ‎June 30,				Six Months Ended ‎June 30,
	2020		2019		2020		2019
Lease expense
Operating lease expense	$	5,255	$	5,356	$	10,200	$	10,838
Variable lease expense ⁽¹⁾		630		369		899		493
Total lease expense	$	5,885	$	5,725	$	11,099	$	11,331

(1)Represents amounts incurred in excess of the ~~total~~minimum payments required ~~over~~for the ~~lease. The company incurred~~handling and unloading of railcars for a certain land lease, ~~expenses~~ offset by railcar lease abatements provided by the lessor when railcars are out of ~~$11.2 million and $33.4 million~~ service during ~~the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017, respectively, and $9.1 million and $27.2 million during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016, respectively.~~periods of maintenance or upgrade.

Supplemental cash flow information related to operating leases is as follows (in thousands):


	Three Months Ended ‎June 30,				Six Months Ended ‎June 30,
	2020		2019		2020		2019
Cash paid for amounts included in the measurement of lease liabilities:
Operating cash flows from operating leases	$	5,019	$	5,319	$	9,868	$	10,803

Right-of-use assets obtained in exchange for lease obligations:
Operating leases		1,204		6,207		6,879		6,207

Supplemental balance sheet information related to operating leases is as follows:

Aggregate minimum lease payments under ~~these~~the operating lease agreements for the remainder of ~~2017~~2020 and in future years are as follows (in thousands):


Year Ending December 31,	Amount		Amount
2017	$	10,168
2018		28,976
2019		19,544
2020		13,160	$	10,837
2021		6,444		14,096
2022				11,907
2023				8,390
2024				6,507
Thereafter		22,105		24,932
Total	$	100,397		76,669
Less: Present value discount				(23,120)
Lease liabilities			$	53,549

~~Commodities~~

Table of Contents

The partnership has additional railcar operating leases that will commence in the second half of 2020 and first half of 2021 to replace expiring leases, with estimated future minimum lease commitments of approximately $26.6 million and lease terms of five years. The undiscounted amounts are not included in the tables above.

Lease Revenue

As described in Note 2 – Revenue, the majority of the partnership’s segment revenue is generated though their storage and throughput services and rail transportation services agreements with Green Plains Trade and are accounted for as lease revenue. Leasing revenues do not represent revenues recognized from contracts with customers under ASC 606, and are accounted for under ASC 842, Leases. Lease revenue associated with agreements with Green Plains Trade are eliminated upon consolidation. The remaining lease revenue is not material to the company. Refer to Note 2 – Revenue for further discussion on lease revenue.

Commodities

As of ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017,~~2020, the company had contracted future purchases of grain, corn oil, natural gas, ~~crude oil,~~ ethanol and distillers grains, ~~and cattle,~~ valued at approximately ~~$454.4~~$158.4 million.

Legal

In November 2013, the company acquired two ethanol plants located in Fairmont, Minnesota and Wood River, Nebraska. There is ongoing litigation related to the consideration for this acquisition. On August 19, 2016, the Delaware Superior Court granted Green Plains’ motion for summary judgment in part and held that the seller’s attempt to disclaim liability for certain shortfall amounts through the use of a disclaimer provision was ineffective. Based on the court order, the company determined that previously accrued contingent liabilities of approximately $6.3 million no longer represented probable losses. These accruals were reversed as a reduction of cost of goods sold during the year ended December 31, 2016, because the adjustment relates to a reduction in the cost of inventory purchased in the acquisitions. The court has directed the company and the seller to work together to determine the precise shortfall amount due to Green Plains. The company believes the remaining amount due to Green Plains is approximately $5.5 million; however, the seller has the right to dispute the details of the calculation and appeal the underlying Superior Court order. Accordingly, the total amount Green Plains may receive is yet to be determined. The remaining amount due to the company represents a gain contingency which will not be recorded until all contingencies are resolved.

~~In addition to the above-described proceeding, the~~ company is currently involved in litigation that has arisen induring the ordinary course of business, but does not believe any pending litigation will have a material adverse effect on its financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

~~14.~~15. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

~~Commercial Contracts~~Green Plains Cattle Company LLC

~~Three subsidiaries~~The company engages in certain related party transactions with GPCC. The company provides a variety of shared services to GPCC, including accounting and finance, payroll and human resources, information technology, legal, communications and treasury activities. The shared services provided by the company and billed to GPCC were $0.4 million and $0.8 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2020, respectively. The company had $1.4 million and $2.2 million outstanding receivables related to the shared service agreement and expenses paid on behalf of GPCC as of June 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019, respectively.

Green Plains Trade Group, a subsidiary of the company, ~~have executed separate financing agreements~~enters into certain sale contracts with GPCC during the normal course of business. Revenues were $3.1 million and $6.0 million for ~~equipment with Amur Equipment Finance. Gordon Glade,~~the three and six months ended June 30, 2020, respectively.

Mr. Ejnar Knudsen, a member of the company’s board of directors, has an indirect ownership interest in GPCC of 0.0736% by reason of his ownership in TGAM Agribusiness Fund LP. Based on the purchase price, the value of that ownership interest is approximately $0.1 million. Mr. Knudsen also is the CEO and partial owner of AGR Partners LLC which provides investment advisory services to TGAM Agribusiness Fund LP pursuant to a ~~shareholder of Amur Equipment Finance.~~ ~~Balances of~~ ~~approximately $638 thousand~~sub-advisory agreement between AGR Partners LLC and $808 thousand related to these financing arrangements were included in debt at September 30, 2017, and December 31, 2016, respectively. Payments, including principal and interest, totaled $69 thousand and $207 thousand during each ofNuveen Alternative Advisors LLC, which is the ~~three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively. The weighted average interest rate~~investment manager for ~~the financing agreements with Amur Equipment Finance was 6.8%.~~TGAM Agribusiness Fund LP.

Aircraft Leases

Effective ~~August~~January 1, ~~2017,~~2015, the company entered into ~~two~~2 agreements with an entity controlled by Wayne Hoovestol for the lease of ~~two aircrafts, replacing the prior agreements.~~2 aircrafts. Mr. Hoovestol is chairman of the company’s board of directors. The company agreed to pay ~~$11,589~~$9,766 per month for the combined use of up to 125 hours per year of the aircrafts. Flight time in excess of 125 hours per year will incur additional hourly ~~charges~~. charges. Payments related to these leases totaled ~~$39 thousand~~$0 and ~~$141~~$24 thousand during the three and ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017,~~ 2020, respectively, and ~~$49~~$35 thousand and ~~$137~~$69 thousand during the three and ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016,~~ 2019, respectively. The company had ~~$2 thousand~~$0 in ~~outstanding~~ ~~payables related to these agreements at September 30, 2017, and no~~ outstanding payables related to these agreements atas of June 30, 2020 and $17 thousand in outstanding payables related to these agreements as of December 31, ~~2016.~~2019.

~~15. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS~~

Table of Contents

16. EQUITY METHOD INVESTMENTS

Green Plains Cattle Company LLC

On ~~October 27, 2017,~~September 9, 2019, Green Plains, TGAM and StepStone announced the ~~partnership upsized its revolving credit facility by $40 million, from $155 million to $195 million, by accessing~~formation of a ~~portion~~joint venture. Such parties entered into the Second Amended and Restated Limited Liability Company Agreement of GPCC effective as of September 1, 2019. GPCC was previously a wholly owned subsidiary of Green Plains. Green Plains also entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement with TGAM and StepStone, whereby TGAM and StepStone purchased an aggregate of 50% of the ~~$100~~membership interests of GPCC from Green Plains. After closing, GPCC is no longer consolidated in the company’s consolidated financial statements and the GPCC investment is accounted for using the equity method of accounting. GPCC results prior to its disposition are classified as discontinued operations in our current and prior period financials.

The GPCC investment is accounted for using the equity method of accounting. GPCC conducts the business of the joint venture, including (i) owning and operating the cattle feeding operations (as defined below), and (ii) any other activities approved by GPCC’s board of managers. GPCC continues to have the capacity to support 355,000 head of cattle and has approximately 11.7 million ~~incremental commitment~~bushels of grain storage capacity. Historical GPCC operational results prior to its disposition are recorded as discontinued operations in ~~place~~the consolidated statement of operations.

The company does not consolidate any part of the assets or liabilities or operating results of its equity method investee. The company’s share of net income or loss in the investee increases or decreases, as applicable, the carrying value of the investment. With respect to GPCC, the company determined that this entity does not represent a variable interest entity and consolidation is not required. In addition, although the company has the ability to exercise significant influence over the joint venture through board representation and voting rights, all significant decisions require the consent of the other investors without regard to economic interest.

Summarized Financial Information

Our equity method investments are summarized in the following table (in thousands):


	Ownership as of June 30, 2020	June 30, 2020		December 31, 2019
Green Plains Cattle Company LLC ⁽¹⁾	50%	$	110,101	$	64,161
Other	Various		3,662		4,837
Total		$	113,763	$	68,998

(1)The equity method investment in GPCC is impacted by the effect of deferred gains or losses on cattle sale contracts designated in a cash flow hedge relationship. Pre-tax accumulated other comprehensive loss for GPCC was $17.1 million as of June 30, 2020 compared to pre-tax accumulated other comprehensive loss of $16.2 million as of December 31, 2019.

Earnings from equity method investments were as follows:


	Three Months Ended ‎June 30,				Six Months Ended ‎June 30,
	2020		2019		2020		2019
Green Plains Cattle Company LLC ⁽¹⁾	$	11,870	$	-	$	19,756	$	-
All others		175		(36)		255		(110)
Total income (loss) from equity method investments, net of income taxes	$	12,045	$	(36)	$	20,011	$	(110)

Distributions from equity method investments	$	11,079	$	-	$	14,326	$	-

Income (loss) from equity method investments, net of distributions	$	966	$	(36)	$	5,685	$	(110)

(1)Pre-tax equity method earnings of GPCC were $15.6 million and $26.0 million for the ~~facility.~~three and six months ended June 30, 2020.

Table of Contents

The company reports its proportional share of equity method investment income (loss) in the consolidated statements of operations. The company’s share of equity method investees other comprehensive income arising during the period is included in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) in the accompanying balance sheet.

The following table present summarized information of GPCC.


	Three Months Ended June 30, 2020		Six Months Ended June 30, 2020
Total revenues	$	256,472	$	490,532
Total operating expenses		225,174		438,438
Net income	$	31,298	$	52,094


	June 30, 2020		December 31, 2019
Balance sheet:
Current assets	$	467,318	$	516,324
Noncurrent assets		71,253		73,922
Current liabilities		318,003		461,534
Noncurrent liabilities		366		390
Net assets	$	220,202	$	128,322

‎

Table of Contents

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

General

The following discussion and analysis provides information we believe is relevant to understand our consolidated financial condition and results of operations. This discussion should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes to the consolidated financial statements contained in this report together with our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, ~~2016.~~2019.

Cautionary Information Regarding Forward-Looking Statements

Forward-looking statements are made in accordance with safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These statements are based on current expectations that involve a number of risks and uncertainties and do not relate strictly to historical or current facts, but rather to plans and objectives for future operations. These statements may be identified by words such as “anticipate,” “believe,” “continue,” “estimate,” “expect,” “intend,” “outlook,” “plan,” “predict,” “may,” “could,” “should,” “will” and similar expressions, as well as statements regarding future operating or financial performance or guidance, business strategy, environment, key trends and benefits of actual or planned acquisitions.

Factors that could cause actual results to differ from those expressed or implied in the forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, those discussed in Part I, Item 1A – Risk Factors of our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, ~~2016,~~2019, Part II, Item 1A – Risk Factors in this report, or incorporated by reference. Specifically, we may experience ~~significant~~ fluctuations in future operating results due to a number of economic conditions, including: disruption caused by health epidemics, such as the COVID-19 outbreak; competition in the ethanol industry and other industries in which we operate; commodity market risks, including those that may result from weather conditions; financial market risks; counterparty risks; risks associated with changes to government policy or regulation, including changes to tax laws; risks related to ~~acquisitions~~acquisition and disposition activities and achieving anticipated results; risks associated with merchant ~~trading, cattle feeding operations, vinegar production~~trading; risks related to our equity method investees and other ~~risk~~ factors detailed in reports filed with the SEC. Additional risks related to Green Plains Partners LP include compliance with commercial contractual obligations, potential tax consequences related to our investment in the partnership and risks disclosed in the partnership’s SEC filings associated with the operation of the partnership as a separate, publicly traded entity.

We believe our expectations regarding future events are based on reasonable assumptions; however, these assumptions may not be accurate or account for all risks and uncertainties. Consequently, forward-looking statements are not guaranteed. Actual results may vary materially from those expressed or implied in our forward-looking statements. In addition, we are not obligated ~~nor~~and do wenot intend to update our forward-looking statements as a result of new information unless it is required by applicable securities laws. We caution investors not to place undue reliance on forward-looking statements, which represent management’s views as of the date of this report or documents incorporated by reference.

Overview

Green Plains is a diversified commodity-processing business with operations ~~related to ethanol production,~~that include corn processing, grain handling and storage ~~cattle feedlots, food ingredients,~~ and commodity marketing and logistics services. The company is one of the leading corn processors in the world and, through its adjacent businesses, is focused on the production of high-protein feed ingredients and export growth opportunities. We are also focused on generating stable operating margins through our ~~diversified business segments and~~ risk management strategy. Green Plains Partners LP is our primary downstream logistics provider, storing and delivering the ethanol we produce. We own a ~~62.5%~~49.0% limited partner interest, a 2.0% general partner interest and all of the partnership’s incentive distribution rights. The public owns the remaining ~~35.5%~~49.0% limited partner interest. The partnership is consolidated in our financial statements. In addition, Green Plains owns a 50% interest in Green Plains Cattle Company LLC.

We are currently undergoing a number of project initiatives to improve margins. Through our Project 24 initiative, we anticipate reductions in operating expense per gallon across our non-ICM plants as a result of these investments. In addition, through our high-protein initiative, we expect to achieve increased margins per gallon as a result of the ability to produce various high protein animal feed products. The first high-protein installation was completed at our Shenandoah plant during the first quarter of 2020 with shipments of dried product beginning in April 2020. We anticipate the remaining locations will be completed over the course of the next several years.

‎

Table of Contents

Recent Developments

Approval of Definitive Term Sheet for $75.0 Million Loan Facility

On July ~~28, 2017,~~29, 2020, we ~~amended~~ announced the approval of a definitive term sheet for a $75.0 million loan facility, which will support the execution of our ~~Green Plains Trade senior secured asset-based revolving credit~~protein strategy. Upon closing, the loan facility is expected to ~~increase~~have a 15-year term and an interest rate with a 5% floor that can be either a fixed rate of 15-year indicative Treasury yield plus 4.00%, or a floating rate of one-month LIBOR plus 4.50%, and will require principal payments of $1.5 million per year beginning 24 months from the ~~maximum commitment from $150.0 million to $300.0 million and extend the maturity~~ ~~date to July 28, 2022. The~~ amended credit facility increases advance rates and modifies the eligible inventory definitions to include additional commodities and locations. Advances are subject to variable interest rates equal to a daily LIBOR rate plus 2.25% or the base rate plus 1.25%. The unused portionclosing date. Closing of the ~~credit~~loan facility is ~~also subject~~expected to ~~a commitment fee of 0.375% per annum.~~

~~On August 29, 2017,~~occur during the ~~company entered into a $500.0 million term~~third quarter. The loan agreement which matures on August 29, 2023, to refinance approximately $405.0 million of total debt outstanding issued by Green Plains Processing and Fleischmann’s Vinegar Company, pay associated fees and expenses and for general corporate purposes. The term loan is guaranteed by the company and substantially all of its subsidiaries, but not Green Plains Partners and certain other entities, andwill be secured by ~~substantially all of~~ the assets of ~~the company, including 17 ethanol production facilities, vinegar production facilities and a~~

~~second priority lien on the assets secured under the revolving credit facilities at~~ Green Plains ~~Trade, Green Plains Cattle~~Shenandoah LLC and Green Plains ~~Grain.~~Wood River LLC.

~~In November~~Impact of ~~2017,~~COVID-19 and Decline in Oil Demand

We continue to closely monitor the impact of COVID-19 on all aspects of our business, including how it will impact our employees, customers, vendors, and business partners. Although we ~~anticipate completion~~did not incur significant disruptions during the three and six months ended June 30, 2020 from COVID-19, we are unable to predict the impact that COVID-19 will have on our future financial position and operating results due to numerous uncertainties.

The COVID-19 pandemic and related economic repercussions have created significant volatility, uncertainty, and turmoil in the energy industry. The situation surrounding COVID-19 continues to evolve rapidly and the ultimate duration and impact of the ~~Phase I development~~outbreak as well as the continued decline in oil demand remains highly uncertain and subject to change.

While we have instituted work from home arrangements for certain staff members, there has been no adverse effect on our ability to maintain operations, including our financial reporting systems, our internal controls over financial reporting or our disclosure controls and procedures. In addition, to date we have not incurred any material COVID-19 related contingencies.

For further information regarding the impact of ~~intermodal export~~COVID-19 and ~~import fuels terminal at Jefferson Gulf Coast Energy Partner’s existing Beaumont, Texas terminal. We anticipate offering our interest~~the decline in oil demand on the ~~joint venture to the partnership once all phases of commercial development are completed.~~company, please see Part II, Item 1A, “Risk Factors,” in this report, which is incorporated herein by reference.

Results of Operations

During the ~~third~~second quarter of ~~2017,~~2020, we ~~resumed~~continued to experience a weak ethanol margin environment. We maintained an average utilization ~~rates aligned with historic levels following idled capacity at several plants in response to the weak margin environment during the previous quarter. We operated our ethanol production facilities at~~rate of approximately ~~83.7%~~53.5% of capacity, resulting in ethanol production of ~~313.6~~149.9 mmg for the ~~third~~second quarter of ~~2017,~~2020, compared with ~~292.2~~224.0 mmg, or ~~92.5%~~80.0% of capacity, for the same quarter last year. ~~Ethanol production capacity~~The reduction in the average utilization rate was ~~increased with our acquisitions~~primarily due to poor margins driven in part by a significant reduction in motor fuel demand as a result of the ~~Madison, Illinois, Mount Vernon, Indiana,~~COVID-19 pandemic. Our operating strategy is to reduce operating expenses, energy usage and ~~York, Nebraska plants, acquired~~water consumption through our Project 24 initiative while running at higher utilization rates in order to achieve improved margins. However, in the current environment, given the significant drop in driving and gasoline demand experienced in the second quarter, we may exercise operational discretion that results in reductions in production. It is possible that production could be below minimum volume commitments in the future, depending on ~~September 23, 2016.~~various factors that drive each bio-refineries variable contribution margin, including future driving and gasoline demand for the industry.

~~Industry Trends~~U.S. Ethanol Supply and ~~Factors Affecting our Results of Operations~~Demand

~~Seasonal summer driving demand was met by increased ethanol production during the third quarter of 2017.~~ According to the EIA, ~~average daily~~ domestic ethanol production ~~was 1.03 million barrels per day during the third quarter of 2017, up slightly from 1.00~~averaged 0.71 million barrels per day during the second quarter of ~~2017. Average daily production increased 4% year-to-date compared with~~2020, which was 33% lower than the 1.05 million barrels per day for the same ~~period~~quarter last ~~year due to incremental expansion by existing facilities to optimize production. Weekly refiner~~year. Refiner and blender input volume ~~which is linked~~decreased 29% to ~~consumer demand, also increased 1% year-to-date~~0.67 million barrels per day for the second quarter of 2020, compared with 0.94 million barrels per day for the same quarter last year. Gasoline demand for the second quarter of 2020 decreased 2.6 million barrels per day, or 27% compared to the same quarter last year. U.S. domestic ethanol ending stocks decreased by approximately 2.7 million barrels, or 12%, to 20.2 million barrels for the second quarter of 2020. At the end of May 2019, the EPA finalized regulations applying the one pound per square inch Reid Vapor Pressure (RVP) waiver that applied to E10 during summer months to apply to E15 as well. This removed a significant barrier to wider sales of E15 in the summer months, thus expanding the market for ethanol in transportation fuel. As of June 30, 2020, there were approximately 2,194 retail stations selling E15 in 30 states, up from 2,080 at the beginning of the year, according to Growth Energy.

In March 2020, members of the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries and their allies (collectively, OPEC+) failed to reach an agreement on production levels which led to a substantial decrease in oil prices and an increasingly volatile market. While OPEC+ agreed in April to cut production, downward pressure on prices has continued and could continue for

Table of Contents

the foreseeable future. In addition, with the widespread shutdowns and “shelter in place” orders across the United States also beginning in March 2020 related to the COVID-19 pandemic, driving miles and fuel consumption have been reduced significantly. This has had a similar impact on ethanol demand resulting in the shutdown of approximately 50% of total industry production capacity.

During the quarter, as economies began to open up from the COVID-19 pandemic, driving demand began to recover and was approximately 90% of prior year levels for the month of July.

Global Ethanol Supply and Demand

According to the USDA Foreign Agriculture Service, domestic ethanol exports through May 31, 2020 were approximately 0.65 bgy, up 1.6% from 0.64 bgy for the same period ~~last year, helped~~of 2019. Brazil remained the largest export destination for U.S. ethanol, which accounted for 27% of domestic ethanol export volume despite the 20% tariff on U.S. ethanol imports in excess of 150 million liters, or 39.6 million gallons per quarter, imposed in September 2017 by Brazil’s Chamber of Foreign Trade, or CAMEX. In a resolution published August 31, 2019, Brazil raised the ~~growing number~~annual import quota to 750 million duty free liters distributed on a quarterly basis as follows: September to November 100 million liters, December to February 100 million liters, March to May 275 million liters and June to August 275 million liters. In addition, India, Canada, and South Korea accounted for 17%, 16%, and 8%, respectively, of ~~retail gasoline stations offering higher~~U.S. ethanol ~~blends~~exports.

On April 1, 2018, China announced it would add an additional 15% tariff to ~~consumers. According~~the existing 30% tariff it had earlier imposed on ethanol imports from the United States and Brazil. China later raised the tariff further to ~~Growth Energy, 1,043 retail stations were selling E15 at October 5, 2017, up~~70% as the trade war escalated. In January 2020, China and the United States agreed to certain trade agreements, the impact of which on ethanol are yet to be determined.

The cost to produce the equivalent amount of starch found in sugar from ~~431 stations at December 31, 2016. Average daily gasoline demand~~$3.50-per-bushel corn is 7 cents per pound. The average price of sugar was ~~flat~~approximately 10.9 cents per pound during the ~~third~~second quarter of 2017, slowing by 1.5% for the nine months ended September 30, 2017, compared with the same periods in 2016. Ethanol futures traded at an average discount of $0.11 to RBOB during the third quarter. At September 30, 2017, domestic ethanol inventory of 21.5 million barrels was 1.4 million barrels higher than the ending stocks at the same time last year. Increased export volumes have partially offset the difference between increased production and blending volumes year over year.

2020. We currently estimate that net ethanol exports will ~~reach between~~range from 1.1 billion ~~gallons and 1.3~~to 1.5 billion gallons in ~~2017. Year-to-date domestic ethanol~~2020, excluding any potential exports to China, based on historical demand from a variety of countries and certain countries who seek to improve their air quality and eliminate MTBE from their own fuel supplies.

Year-to-date U.S. distillers grains exports through ~~August~~May 2020, were 4.1 million metric tons, or 6.6% lower than the same period last year, according to the USDA Foreign Agriculture Service. Mexico, South Korea, Vietnam, Indonesia, Thailand, and Japan, accounted for approximately 65.6% of total U.S. distillers export volumes.

Legislation and Regulation

We are sensitive to government programs and policies that affect the supply and demand for ethanol and other fuels, which in turn may impact the volume of ethanol and other fuels we handle. Various bills have been discussed in the House and Senate which would eliminate the RFS II entirely, eliminate the corn based ethanol portion of the mandate, or make it more difficult to sell fuel blends with higher levels of ethanol. We believe it is unlikely that any of these bills will become law in the current Congress. In addition, the manner in which the EPA administers the RFS II can have a significant impact on the actual amount of ethanol blended into the domestic fuel supply.

Federal mandates and state-level clean fuel programs supporting the use of renewable fuels are a significant driver of ethanol demand in the U.S. Ethanol policies are influenced by concerns for the environment, diversifying our fuel supply, and reducing the country’s dependence on foreign oil. Consumer acceptance of flex-fuel vehicles and higher ethanol blends of ethanol in non-flex-fuel vehicles may be necessary before ethanol can achieve further growth in U.S. market share.

Congress first enacted CAFE in 1975 to reduce energy consumption by increasing the fuel economy of cars and light trucks. Flexible-fuel vehicles (FFVs), which are designed to run on a mixture of fuels, including higher blends of ethanol such as E85, receive preferential treatment in the form of CAFE credits. There are approximately 21 million FFVs on the road in the U.S. today, 16 million of which are light duty trucks. FFV credits have been decreasing since 2014 and will be completely phased out in 2020. Absent CAFE preferences, auto manufacturers may not be willing to build flexible-fuel vehicles, which has the potential to slow the growth of E85 markets. However, California’s Low Carbon Fuel Standard program (LCFS) has driven growth in E85 usage, and other state/regional LCFS programs have the potential to do the same.

The One-Pound Waiver that was extended in May 2019 to allow E15 to be sold year-round to all vehicles model year 2001 and newer is being challenged in an action filed in Federal District Court for the DC Circuit. However, the One-Pound Waiver remains in effect.

Table of Contents

The RFS II has been a driving factor in the growth of ethanol usage in the United States. When the RFS II was established in 2010, the required volume of “conventional” or corn-based ethanol to be blended with gasoline was to increase each year until it reached 15.0 billion gallons in 2015, which left the EPA to address existing limitations in both supply (ethanol production) and demand (usage of ethanol blends in older vehicles). On December 19, 2019, the EPA announced the final 2020 RVO for conventional ethanol, which met the 15.0-billion-gallon congressional target. The EPA has not yet released a draft RVO rule for the 2021volumes, though it typically does so in June or July, and aims to finalize the rule by November 30 ~~2017, were 906.5 mmg, up 53%~~each year.

The EPA has the authority to waive the mandates, in whole or in part, if there is inadequate domestic renewable fuel supply or the requirement severely harms the economy or environment. According to the RFS II, if mandatory renewable fuel volumes are reduced by at least 20% for two consecutive years, the EPA is required to modify, or reset, statutory volumes through 2022 – the year through which the statutorily prescribed volumes run. While conventional ethanol maintained 15 billion gallons, 2019 was the second consecutive year that the total proposed RVO was more than 20% below statutory volumes levels. Thus, the EPA was expected to initiate a reset rulemaking, and modify statutory volumes through 2022, and do so based on the same factors they are to use in setting the RVOs post-2022. These factors include environmental impact, domestic energy security, expected production, infrastructure impact, consumer costs, job creation, price of agricultural commodities, food prices, and rural economic development. However, on December 19, 2019, the EPA announced it would not be moving forward with a reset rulemaking in 2020.

The EPA assigns individual refiners, blenders, and importers the volume of renewable fuels they are obligated to use based on their percentage of total domestic transportation fuel sales. Obligated parties use RINs to show compliance with the RFS II mandated volumes. Ethanol producers assign RINs to renewable fuels and the RINs are detached when the renewable fuel is blended with transportation fuel domestically. Market participants can trade the detached RINs in the open market. The market price of detached RINs affects the price of ethanol in certain markets and can influence purchasing decisions by obligated parties.

On April 15, 2020, five Governors sent a letter to the EPA requesting a general waiver from the ~~comparable period~~RFS due to the drop in ~~2016. Brazil~~demand caused by COVID-19 travel restrictions. They contend that the compliance costs – i.e. cost to purchase RINs – is onerous and could put some refineries out of business. The EPA has 90 days to respond, and as of this filing had indicated only that they are “watching the situation closely, and reviewing the governors’ letter.”

Under the RFS II, a small refinery is defined as one that processes fewer than 75,000 barrels of petroleum per day. Small refineries can petition the EPA for a SRE which, if approved, waives their portion of the annual RVO requirements. The EPA, through consultation with the Department of Energy and the Department of Agriculture, can grant them a full or partial waiver, or deny it outright within 90 days of submittal. The EPA granted significantly more of these waivers for 2016, 2017 and 2018 than they had in the past, totaling 790 million gallons of waived requirements for the 2016 compliance year, 1.82 billion gallons for 2017 and 1.43 billion gallons for 2018. In doing so, the EPA effectively reduced the RFS II mandated volumes for those compliance years by those amounts respectively, and as a result, RIN values have declined significantly.

Biofuels groups have filed a lawsuit in the Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, challenging the 2019 RVO rule over the EPA’s failure to address small refinery exemptions in the rulemaking. This was the first RFS II rulemaking since the expanded use of the exemptions came to light; however, the EPA had declined to cap the number of waivers it grants, and until late 2019, had declined to alter how it accounts for the retroactive waivers in its annual volume calculations. The EPA has a statutory mandate to ensure the volume requirements are met, which are achieved by setting the percentage standards for obligated parties. The EPA’s recent approach accomplished the opposite. Even if all the obligated parties complied with their respective percentage obligations for 2019, the nation’s overall supply of renewable fuel would not meet the total volume requirements set by the EPA. This undermines Congressional intent to increase the consumption of renewable fuels in the domestic transportation fuel supply. Biofuels groups have argued the EPA must therefore adjust its percentage standard calculations to make up for past retroactive waivers and adjust the standards to account for any waivers it reasonably expects to grant in the future.

In a supplemental rulemaking to the 2020 RVO rule, the EPA changed their approach, and for the first time accounted for ~~37%~~the gallons that they anticipate they will be waiving from the blending requirements due to small refinery exemptions. To accomplish this, they are adding in the trailing three year average of gallons the Department of Energy recommended be waived, in effect raising the blending volumes across the board in anticipation of waiving the obligations in whole or in part for certain refineries that qualify for the exemptions. Though the EPA has often disregarded the recommendations of the ~~domestic~~Department of Energy in years past, they stated in the rule their intent to adhere to these recommendations going forward, including granting partial waivers rather than an all or nothing approach. The EPA will be adjudicating the 2020 compliance

Table of Contents

year small refinery exemption applications in early 2021, but have indicated they will adhere to Department of Energy recommendations for the 2019 compliance year applications as well, which should be adjudicated in 2020. There were 26 applications pending as of this filing.

On January 24, 2020, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 10th Circuit ruled on RFA et. al. vs. EPA in favor of biofuels interests, overturning EPA’s granting of refinery exemptions to three refineries on two separate grounds. The Court agreed that, under the Clean Air Act, refineries are eligible for SREs for a given RVO year only if such exemptions are extensions of exemptions granted in previous RVO years. In this case, the three refineries at issue did not qualify for SREs in the year prior to the year that EPA granted them. They were thus ineligible for additional SRE relief because there were no immediately prior SREs to extend. In addition, the Court agreed that the disproportionate economic hardship prong of SRE eligibility should be determined solely by reference to whether compliance with the RFS II creates such hardship, not whether compliance plus other issues create disproportionate economic hardship. The Court thus vacated EPA's grant of SREs for certain years and remanded the grants back to EPA. The refiners appealed for a rehearing which was denied. It is possible the decision will be appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court. If the decision against the EPA is upheld by the Supreme Court, it is uncertain how the EPA will propose to remedy the situation.

In October 2019, the White House directed the USDA and EPA to move forward with rulemaking to expand access to higher blends of biofuels. This includes funding for infrastructure, labeling changes and allowing E15 to be sold through E10 infrastructure.

In 2017, the D.C. Circuit ruled in favor of biofuel groups against the EPA related to its decision to lower the 2016 volume requirements by 500 million gallons. As a result, the Court remanded to the EPA to make up for the 500 million gallons. Despite this, in the proposed 2020 RVO rulemaking released in July 2019, the EPA stated it does not intend to make up the 500 million gallons as the court directed, citing potential burden on obligated parties. The EPA has indicated that it plans to address this court ordered remand in conjunction with the 2021 RVO rulemaking.

To respond to the COVID-19 health crisis and attempt to offset the subsequent economic damage, Congress passed multiple relief measures, most notably the Coronavirus Aid, Relief and Economic Security Act (CARES Act) in March 2020, which created and funded multiple programs that have impacted or could impact our industry. The USDA was given additional resources for the Commodity Credit Corporation (CCC) and they are using those funds to provide direct payments to farmers, including corn farmers from whom we purchase most of our feedstock for ethanol ~~export volumes, while Canada, India,~~production. Similar to the ~~Philippines~~trade aid payments made by the USDA over the past two years, this cash injection for farmers could cause them to delay marketing decisions and ~~United Arab Emirates accounted~~increase the price we have to pay to purchase the corn. The USDA did not include any CCC funds for ~~24%, 11%, 5%~~ethanol plants as of this filing.

The CARES Act provided for the Small Business Administration (SBA) to assist companies with fewer than 500 employees, and ~~4%, respectively. On~~for some North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) codes, 1,000 employees, and keep them from laying off workers. The Paycheck Protection Program (PPP) was created and made payments to many farmers and ethanol plants with fewer than 1,000 employees. This could create a competitive imbalance in the marketplace, and for farmers, like the CCC funds, incentivize them to delay marketing corn. The PPP had its authorization increased by $321 billion in April.

The CARES Act also directed the Treasury Department to create programs to support medium-sized businesses, with fewer than 10,000 employees. The “Main Street” programs provide low interest loans to qualifying companies, though we do not qualify according to the most recent guidance from the Treasury Department.

Industrial grade ethanol is the primary ingredient in hand sanitizer. The CARES Act provided a tax exclusion on the shipment of un-denatured ethanol for use in manufacturing hand sanitizer. The FDA has provided expanded guidance to allow for more denaturants to be used in ethanol intended for hand sanitizer production, and has expanded the grades of ethanol allowed for the duration of the public health crisis which on July 25, 2020 was extended another 90 days by the U.S. Secretary of Health and Human Services.

Government actions abroad can significantly impact the demand for U.S. ethanol. In September ~~13,~~ 2017, China’s National Development and Reform Commission, the National Energy ~~Board~~Agency and 15 other state departments issued a joint plan to expand the use and production of biofuels containing up to 10% ethanol by 2020. China, the number three importer of U.S. ethanol in 2016, ~~has~~ imported negligible volumes ~~year-to-date~~during 2018 and 2019 due to a 30% tariff ~~imposed~~ on U.S. ~~and Brazil fuel~~ ethanol, which ~~took effect on January 1, 2017, and there~~increased to 70% in early 2018. There is no assurance ~~the recently issued~~that China’s joint plan to expand blending to 10% will be carried to fruition, nor that it will lead to increased imports of U.S. ~~ethanol. On September 1, 2017, Brazil’s Chamber~~ethanol in the near term. Ethanol is included as an agricultural commodity under

Table of Contents

the “Phase I” agreement with China, wherein they are to purchase upwards of $40 billion in agricultural commodities from the U.S. in both 2020 and 2021. To date in 2020, there have been no meaningful purchases of U.S. ethanol by China.

In Brazil, the Secretary of Foreign Trade ~~or CAMEX,~~ issued an official written resolution, imposing a 20% tariff on U.S. ethanol imports in excess of 150 million liters, or 39.6 million gallons per ~~quarter.~~quarter in September 2017. The initial ruling iswas valid for two ~~years.~~ years; however, it was extended at the end of August 2019 for an additional year. On an annual basis, Brazil will now allow into the country 750 million duty free liters distributed on a quarterly basis as follows: September to November 100 million liters, December to February 100 million liters, March to May 275 million liters and June to August 275 million liters.

Our exports also face tariffs, rate quotas, countervailing duties, and other hurdles in the European Union, India, Peru, Columbia and elsewhere, which limits the ability to compete in some markets. Some countries are using the COVID-19 crisis as justification for raising duties on imports of U.S. ethanol, or blocking our imports entirely.

In ~~Mexico, four lawsuits challenging the~~ June 2017, ~~decision by~~ the Energy Regulatory Commission of Mexico (CRE) ~~to approve~~approved the use of 10% ethanol blends, which was challenged by multiple lawsuits, of which several were dismissed. ~~A fifth lawsuit~~The remaining four cases follow one of two tracks: 1) to determine the constitutionality of the CRE regulation, or 2) to determine the benefits, or lack thereof, of introducing E10 to Mexico. An injunction was ~~allowed~~granted in October 2017, preventing the blending and selling of E10, but was overturned by a higher court in June 2018 making it legal to ~~proceed~~blend and sell E10 by PEMEX throughout Mexico except for ~~judicial review, despite precedent set by~~its three largest metropolitan areas. On January 15, 2020, the ~~Mexico~~Mexican Supreme Court ruled that the expedited process for ~~dismissal. The~~the CRE regulation was unconstitutional, and that after a 180 day period the maximum ethanol blend allowed in the country would revert to 5.8%. There is ~~expected~~an effort underway to ~~defend its position before~~go through the ~~judge makes a final decision. Should~~full regulatory process to allow for 10% blends countrywide, including in the ~~judge rule in favor of the plaintiff, the case will go to the Supreme Court.~~three major metropolitan areas. U.S. ethanol exports to Mexico totaled 2931.2 mmg in ~~2016.~~2019.

On ~~July 5, 2017,~~January 29, 2020, the ~~EPA proposed maintaining~~President signed into law the ~~RVOs for conventional~~updated North American Free Trade Agreement, known as the United States Mexico Canada Agreement or USMCA. The pact maintains the duty free access of U.S. agricultural commodities, including ethanol, at 15.0 billion gallons while lowering the volume obligations for advanced alternatives, reducing the overall biofuel target to 19.24 billion gallons for 2018. On September 26, 2017, the EPA issued a Notice of Data Availability for comment, proposing to further reduce the 2018 advanced biofuel volume requirement by 315 mmg, to 3.77 billion gallons,into Canada and the total renewable fuel requirement to 18.77 billion gallons, leaving conventional ethanol at 15.0 billion gallons. According to RFS II, if mandatory renewable fuel volumes are reduced by at least 20% for two consecutive years, the EPA is required to modify, or reset, statutory volumes through 2022. Since 2018 is the first year the total proposed RVOs are more than 20% below statutory levels, the EPA Administrator directed his staff to initiate the required technical analysis to perform any future reset consistent with the reset rules. If 2019 RVOs are also more than 20% below statutory levels, the RVO reset will be triggered under RFS II and the EPA will be required to modify statutory volumes through 2022 within one year of the trigger event, based on the same factors used to set the RVOs post-2022.

Mexico. The ~~U.S. Federal District Court for the D.C. Circuit ruled~~USMCA went into effect on July 28, 2017, in favor of the Americans for Clean Energy and its petitioners against the EPA related to its decision to lower the 2016 volume requirements. The Court concluded the EPA erred in how it interpreted the “inadequate domestic supply” waiver provision of RFS II, which authorizes the EPA to consider supply-side factors affecting the volume of renewable fuel available to refiners, blenders, and importers to meet the statutory volume requirements. The waiver provision does not allow the EPA to consider the volume of renewable fuel available to consumers or the demand-side constraints that affect the consumption of renewable fuel by consumers. As a result, the Court vacated the EPA’s decision to reduce the total renewable fuel volume requirements for 2016 through its waiver authority, which the EPA is expected to address. We believe this decision will benefit the industry overall, with the EPA’s waiver analysis now limited to supply considerations only, and expect the primary impact will be on the RINs market.1, 2020.

Year-to-date U.S. distillers grains exports through August 30, 2017, were 7.3 million metric tons, approximately 4% lower than year-to-date distillers grains exports for the same period last year. Mexico, Turkey, South Korea, Canada, Thailand and Indonesia accounted for 62% of total U.S. distillers export volumes, according to the EIA. On September 1, 2017, the Minister of Agriculture and Rural Development of Vietnam lifted the suspension which blockedColombia banned imports of U.S. ~~dried distillers grains since January 2017.~~

~~On October 19, 2017,~~fuel ethanol for two months, and on June 30^th extended the ~~EPA Administrator reiterated his commitment to~~ban one additional month. The Columbian President ordered this emergency decree citing COVID-19 as the ~~text and spirit~~rationale. This action is WTO compliant under Article 20 of the ~~RFS II.~~GATT. In a letter to seven Senators from the Midwestern states, he stated the EPA will meet the November 30, 2017, deadline for issuing RVOs and the EPA’s preliminary analysis suggests that final RVOs should be set at amounts at or greater than those provided on July 5, 2017. Moreover, the EPA is actively exploring its authority to issue an RVP waiver and will be pursuing action on RINs involving ethanol exports.

On October 25, 2017, the Master Limited Partnership Parity Act was introduced in the Senate and House of Representatives (H.R. 4118), proposing to expand the definition of qualified sources of income to include clean energy resources, such as ethanol production, and infrastructure projects by publicly traded partnerships. Currently, qualifying income includes the transportation and storage of ethanol and certain specific alternative fuels.

~~World demand for U.S. beef has risen as diets continue to improve worldwide to include increased animal protein. In June of 2017,~~2019, the U.S. ~~resumed exporting beef to China, following a 13-year ban the Trump Administration lifted as part~~shipped Columbia 80.2 million gallons of ~~a new bilateral agreement between the countries.~~ethanol.

Comparability of our Financial Results

~~As a result of acquisitions during 2016, we implemented segment organizational changes during the fourth quarter of 2016, whereby we now~~We report the financial and operating performance infor the following four operating segments: (1) ethanol production, which includes the production of ethanol, including industrial-grade alcohol, distillers grains and corn oil, (2) agribusiness and energy services, which includes grain handling and storage, ~~and~~commodity marketing and merchant trading for company-produced and third-party ethanol, distillers grains, corn oil, natural gas and other commodities, (3) food and ingredients, which includes ~~cattle feedlots, vinegar production and~~ food-grade corn oil ~~operations~~ and (4) partnership, which includes fuel storage and transportation services. ~~Prior periods have been reclassified~~

We sold an aggregate 50% membership interest in GPCC to ~~conform to~~TGAM and StepStone during the ~~revised segment presentation.~~

~~We have re-evaluated~~third quarter of 2019. After closing, GPCC is no longer consolidated in the ~~profitability measure~~company’s consolidated financial statements and the GPCC investment is accounted for using the equity method of ~~our reportable segments’ operating performance and have determined~~accounting. The company concluded that segment EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization) is primarily used by our management to evaluate segment operating activities, and therefore is a more meaningful profitability measure than the previously reported segment operating income. In addition, EBITDA is a financial measure that is widely used by analysts and investors in our industries. As a result, we are now including segment EBITDA as a performance measure.

~~Effective April 1, 2016, we increased our ownership~~disposition of ~~BioProcess Algae, a joint venture formed in 2008, to 82.8% and currently own~~ ~~approximately 90.0%~~GPCC met the requirements under ASC 205-20. ~~Beginning April~~ ~~1, 2016,~~ ~~we consolidate the financial~~Therefore,GPCC results ~~of BioProcess Algae, and record a noncontrolling interest~~ for the ~~economic interest in the joint venture held by others.~~three and six months ended June 30, 2019 are classified as discontinued operations.

On September 23, 2016, we acquired three ethanol production facilities located in Madison, Illinois, Mount Vernon, Indiana, and York, Nebraska, with combined annual production capacity of approximately 230 mmgy.

~~On October 3, 2016, we acquired Fleischmann’s Vinegar, one of the world’s largest producers of food-grade industrial vinegar which includes seven production~~ ~~facilities and four distribution warehouses.~~

~~On March 16, 2017, we acquired the assets of a cattle-feeding operation located in Hereford, Texas, which added a feedlot capacity of 30,000 head of cattle to our operations.~~

On May 16, 2017, we acquired the assets of two cattle-feeding operations located in Leoti, Kansas and Yuma, Colorado, which added a combined feedlot capacity of 155,000 head of cattle to our operations.

~~Corporate activities include selling, general and administrative expenses, consisting primarily of compensation, professional fees and overhead costs not directly related to a specific operating segment.~~

During the normal course of business, our operating segments do business with each other. For example, our agribusiness and energy services segment procures grain and natural gas and sells products, including ethanol, distillers grains and corn oil of our ethanol production segment. Our partnership segment provides fuel storage and transportation services for our agribusiness and energy services segment. These intersegment activities are treated like third-party transactions with origination, marketing and storage fees charged at estimated market values. Consequently, these transactions affect segment performance; however, they do not impact our consolidated results since the revenues and corresponding costs are eliminated.

Corporate activities include selling, general and administrative expenses, consisting primarily of compensation, professional fees and overhead costs not directly related to a specific operating segment. When we evaluate segment performance, we review the following segment information as well as earnings before interest, income taxes, depreciation and amortization, excluding amortization of operating lease right-of-use assets and amortization of debt issuance costs, or EBITDA.

Table of Contents

The company also owns a 90.0% interest in BioProcess Algae, a joint venture formed in 2008. We consolidate the financial results of BioProcess Algae, and record a noncontrolling interest for the economic interest in the joint venture held by others.

As of June 30, 2020, we, together with our subsidiaries, own a ~~62.5%~~49.0% limited partner interest and a 2.0% general partner interest in the partnership and own all of the partnership’s incentive distribution rights, with the remaining ~~35.5%~~49.0% limited partner interest owned by public common unitholders. We consolidate the financial results of the partnership, and record a noncontrolling interest for the economic interest in the partnership held by the public common unitholders.

Segment Results

The selected operating segment financial information are as follows (in thousands):


	Three Months Ended September 30,				%	Nine Months Ended September 30,				%	Three Months Ended ‎June 30,				%	Six Months Ended ‎June 30,				%
	2017		2016		Variance	2017		2016		Variance	2020		2019⁽¹⁾		Variance	2020		2019⁽¹⁾		Variance
Revenues:
Ethanol production:
Revenues from external customers	$	620,180	$	586,988	5.7%	$	1,857,356	$	1,710,484	8.6%	$	290,517	$	450,917	(35.6%)	$	766,217	$	721,725	6.2%
Intersegment revenues		3,579		-	*		6,624		-	*		25		26	(3.8)		50		51	(2.0)
Total segment revenues		623,759		586,988	6.3		1,863,980		1,710,484	9.0		290,542		450,943	(35.6)		766,267		721,776	6.2
Agribusiness and energy services:
Revenues from external customers		164,604		168,143	(2.1)		483,670		531,445	(9.0)		126,088		177,961	(29.1)		281,969		342,037	(17.6)
Intersegment revenues		14,406		8,936	61.2		33,679		24,934	35.1		4,368		7,007	(37.7)		11,676		12,139	(3.8)
Total segment revenues		179,010		177,079	1.1		517,349		556,379	(7.0)		130,456		184,968	(29.5)		293,645		354,176	(17.1)
Food and ingredients:
Revenues from external customers		114,750		84,655	35.6		329,432		230,812	42.7		-		-	-		-		1,452	*
Intersegment revenues		38		37	2.7		113		112	0.9		-		-	-		-		-	-
Total segment revenues		114,788		84,692	35.5		329,545		230,924	42.7		-		-	-		-		1,452	*
Partnership:
Revenues from external customers		1,701		2,066	(17.7)		4,724		6,042	(21.8)		1,384		1,692	(18.2)		2,672		3,997	(33.1)
Intersegment revenues		24,748		24,139	2.5		74,019		69,445	6.6		18,997		19,133	(0.7)		37,980		37,915	0.2
Total segment revenues		26,449		26,205	0.9		78,743		75,487	4.3		20,381		20,825	(2.1)		40,652		41,912	(3.0)
Revenues including intersegment activity		944,006		874,964	7.9		2,789,617		2,573,274	8.4		441,379		656,736	(32.8)		1,100,564		1,119,316	(1.7)
Intersegment eliminations		(42,771)		(33,112)	29.2		(114,435)		(94,491)	21.1		(23,390)		(26,166)	(10.6)		(49,706)		(50,105)	(0.8)
Revenues as reported	$	901,235	$	841,852	7.1%	$	2,675,182	$	2,478,783	7.9%	$	417,989	$	630,570	(33.7%)	$	1,050,858	$	1,069,211	(1.7%)

(1)Revenues include certain items which were previously considered intercompany transactions prior to the disposition of GPCC and therefore eliminated upon consolidation. These revenue transactions are now presented on a gross basis in product revenues. These revenue transactions total $5.7 million and $9.1 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2019, respectively.


	Three Months Ended ‎June 30,				%	Six Months Ended ‎June 30,				%
	2020		2019⁽¹⁾		Variance	2020		2019⁽¹⁾		Variance
Cost of goods sold:
Ethanol production	$	284,174	$	483,352	(41.2%)	$	773,324	$	776,839	(0.5%)
Agribusiness and energy services		125,768		176,214	(28.6)		282,270		335,840	(16.0)
Food and ingredients		-		6	*		-		1,522	*
Intersegment eliminations		(19,081)		(25,612)	(25.5)		(47,505)		(45,850)	3.6
	$	390,861	$	633,960	(38.3%)	$	1,008,089	$	1,068,351	(5.6%)

‎

Table of Contents


	Three Months Ended September 30,				%	Nine Months Ended September 30,				%	Three Months Ended ‎June 30,				%	Six Months Ended ‎June 30,				%
	2017		2016		Variance	2017		2016		Variance	2020		2019		Variance	2020		2019		Variance
Cost of goods sold:
Operating income (loss):
Ethanol production(1)	$	590,904	$	549,705	7.5%	$	1,802,688	$	1,649,641	9.3%	$	(18,792)	$	(53,885)	(65.1%)	$	(79,573)	$	(98,077)	(18.9%)
Agribusiness and energy services		168,735		163,643	3.1		487,239		518,135	(6.0)		351		4,341	(91.9)		2,911		9,645	(69.8)
Food and ingredients		98,854		78,792	25.5		281,898		219,087	28.7		-		(5)	*		-		(70)	*
Partnership		-		-	*		-		-	*		12,225		13,156	(7.1)		24,655		25,707	(4.1)
Intersegment eliminations		(42,706)		(33,257)	28.4		(114,123)		(93,769)	21.7		(4,283)		(528)	*		(2,150)		(4,205)	(48.9)
Corporate activities												(8,869)		(9,724)	(8.8)		(19,539)		(18,283)	6.9
	$	815,787	$	758,883	7.5%	$	2,457,702	$	2,293,094	7.2%	$	(19,368)	$	(46,645)	(58.5%)	$	(73,696)	$	(85,283)	(13.6%)

(1)Operating loss for ethanol production includes a goodwill impairment charge of $24.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2020.


	Three Months Ended September 30,				%	Nine Months Ended September 30,				%	Three Months Ended ‎June 30,				%	Six Months Ended ‎June 30,				%
	2017		2016		Variance	2017		2016		Variance	2020		2019		Variance	2020		2019		Variance
Operating income (loss):
Depreciation and amortization:
Ethanol production	$	3,107	$	14,334	(78.3%)	$	(25,950)	$	(7,673)	(238.2%)	$	17,184	$	15,437	11.3%	$	33,082	$	30,777	7.5%
Agribusiness and energy services		3,686		7,241	(49.1)		13,138		20,744	(36.7)		556		552	0.7		1,109		1,101	0.7
Food and ingredients		10,132		5,199	94.9		30,472		9,594	217.6
Partnership		16,290		15,084	8.0		47,707		42,958	11.1		966		771	25.3		1,927		1,756	9.7
Intersegment eliminations		8		181	(95.6)		(147)		(612)	(76.0)
Corporate activities		(12,507)		(11,184)	11.8		(30,898)		(29,393)	5.1		669		751	(10.9)		1,337		1,501	(10.9)
	$	20,716	$	30,855	(32.9%)	$	34,322	$	35,618	(3.6%)	$	19,375	$	17,511	10.6%	$	37,455	$	35,135	6.6%

The following table reconciles segment EBITDA to consolidated adjusted EBITDA (in thousands):


	Three Months Ended ‎June 30,				%	Six Months Ended ‎June 30,				%
	2020		2019		Variance	2020		2019		Variance
Adjusted EBITDA:
Ethanol production	$	(1,607)	$	(38,737)	95.9%	$	(45,732)	$	(67,240)	32.0%
Agribusiness and energy services		1,037		4,899	(78.8)		4,165		10,761	(61.3)
Food and ingredients		-		(5)	*		-		(69)	*
Partnership		13,366		14,017	(4.6)		26,914		27,788	(3.1)
Intersegment eliminations		(4,283)		(528)	*		(2,150)		(4,205)	48.9
Corporate activities ⁽¹⁾		7,381		(8,326)	188.7		8,329		(14,705)	156.6
EBITDA		15,894		(28,680)	155.4		(8,474)		(47,670)	82.2
EBITDA adjustments related to discontinued operations		-		8,911	*		-		9,232	*
Proportional share of EBITDA adjustments to equity method investees		2,041		310	*		4,978		641	*
Noncash goodwill impairment		-		-	*		24,091		-	*
Adjusted EBITDA	$	17,935	$	(19,459)	192.2%	$	20,595	$	(37,797)	154.5%

(1)Includes corporate expenses, offset by earnings from equity method investments of $12.0 million and $19.8 million for the ~~periods indicated (in thousands):~~three and six months ended June 30, 2020, respectively.

Three Months Ended
September 30,

Nine Months Ended
September 30,

2017

2016

2017

2016
Net income
$
39,429

$
12,884

$
29,284

$
6,053
Interest expense

31,889

11,819

69,815

33,117
Income tax expense (benefit)

(48,775)

5,083

(60,905)

(4,339)
Depreciation and amortization

27,834

19,286

80,105

56,132
EBITDA
$
50,377

$
49,072

$
118,299

$
90,963

* Percentage variance not considered meaningful.

Three Months Ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017, compared~~2020 Compared with the Three Months Ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016~~2019

Consolidated Results

Consolidated revenues ~~increased $59.4~~decreased $212.6 million for the three months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017,~~2020 compared with the same period in ~~2016. Revenues were impacted by an increase in~~2019 primarily due to lower production volumes of ethanol, ~~volumes sold, plus the additions of Fleischmann’s Vinegar during the fourth quarter of 2016~~distillers grains and ~~the cattle feedlots during the first~~corn oil.

Operating loss decreased $27.3 million and ~~second quarters of 2017.~~

~~Operating income decreased $10.1~~adjusted EBITDA increased $37.4 million for the three months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017,~~2020 compared with the same period last year primarily due to ~~decreased~~improved margins on ethanol production ~~partially offset by~~as well as equity earnings from the ~~Fleischmann’s Vinegar and the cattle feedlot acquisitions. EBITDA increased $1.3~~GPCC joint venture. Interest expense decreased $1.6 million for the three months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017,~~2020 compared with the same period in 2019. Income tax benefit was $11.5 million for the three months ended June 30, 2020 compared with $15.3 million for the same period in 2019. The decrease in the income tax benefit was primarily due to a decrease in pre-tax loss for the three months ended June 30, 2020 as compared to the same period in 2019 offset by the tax benefit for the utilization of previously recorded tax NOLs in the three month period ended June 30, 2020 as allowed under the provisions of the recently enacted CARES Act.

The following discussion provides greater detail about our second quarter segment performance.

Ethanol Production Segment

Key operating data for our ethanol production segment is as follows:


	Three Months Ended ‎June 30,
	2020	2019	% Variance

Ethanol sold
(thousands of gallons)	149,872	224,023	(33.1)
Distillers grains sold
(thousands of equivalent dried tons)	383	586	(34.6)
Corn oil sold
(thousands of pounds)	39,496	53,040	(25.5)
Corn consumed
(thousands of bushels)	51,908	77,963	(33.4)

Revenues in our ethanol production segment decreased $160.4 million for the three months ended June 30, 2020 compared with the same period in 2019 primarily due to lower production volumes of ethanol, distillers grains and corn oil.

Cost of goods sold for our ethanol production segment decreased $199.2 million for the three months ended June 30, 2020 compared with the same period last year primarily due to lower production volumes. Operating loss decreased $35.1 million and EBITDA increased $37.1 million for the three months ended June 30, 2020 compared with the same period in 2019 primarily due to improved margins on ethanol production, specifically related to the sale of high protein animal feed products and industrial-grade alcohol. Depreciation and amortization expense for the ethanol production segment was $17.2 million for the three months ended June 30, 2020 compared with $15.4 million for the same period last year.

Agribusiness and Energy Services Segment

Revenues in our agribusiness and energy services segment decreased $54.5 million while operating income decreased $4.0 million and EBITDA decreased by $3.9 million for the three months ended June 30, 2020 compared with the same period in 2019. The decrease in revenues was primarily due to a decrease in ethanol, distillers grain and corn oil trading activity driven by lower production volumes, as well as lower average realized prices for ethanol. Operating income and EBITDA decreased primarily as a result of lower margins.

Food and Ingredients Segment

The food and ingredients segment, which now represents food-grade corn oil production had no activity during the three months ended June 30, 2020.

Partnership Segment

Revenues generated by our partnership segment decreased $0.4 million for the three months ended June 30, 2020, compared with the same period for 2019. Terminal services revenue decreased $0.3 million primarily as result of a decrease in fees associated with minimum volume commitments. Revenues generated from railcar transportation services decreased $0.1 million primarily due to lower sublease revenue. Operating income decreased $0.9 million and EBITDA decreased $0.7 million for the three months ended June 30, 2020 compared with the same period in 2019.

Intersegment Eliminations

Intersegment eliminations of revenues decreased by $2.8 million for the three months ended June 30, 2020 compared with the same period in 2019 due to decreased marketing and corn origination fees within the agribusiness and energy services segment.

Corporate Activities

Operating income was impacted by a decrease in operating expenses for corporate activities, primarily related to travel and entertainment, of $0.9 million for the three months ended June 30, 2020 compared with the same period in 2019.

Income Taxes

We recorded income tax benefit of $11.5 million for the three months ended June 30, 2020, compared with $15.3 million for the same period in 2019. The decrease in the amount of tax benefit recorded for the three months ended June 30, 2020 compared to the same period in 2019 was due to a decrease in pre-tax loss for the three months ended June 30, 2020 as compared to the same period in 2019 offset by the tax benefit associated with the carry back of the tax NOL generated in 2019 to the 2014 tax year under the CARES Act, as well as the release of a previously recorded valuation allowance against the 2019 NOL and other deferred tax assets.

Income from Equity Method Investees

Income from equity method investees increased $12.1 million for the three months ended June 30, 2020 compared with the same period last year due to earnings from our GPCC joint venture during the current period. Prior to its disposition during the third quarter of 2019, GPCC was a consolidated entity.

Net Income from Discontinued Operations

As previously discussed, we sold an aggregate 50% membership interest in GPCC to TGAM and StepStone during the third quarter of 2019. After closing, GPCC is no longer consolidated in the company’s consolidated financial statements and the GPCC investment is accounted for using the equity method of accounting. GPCC results for the three months ended June 30, 2019 are classified as discontinued operations. Net income from discontinued operations was $1.9 million for the three months ended June 30, 2019.

Six Months Ended June 30, 2020 Compared with the Six Months Ended June 30, 2019

Consolidated Results

Consolidated revenues decreased $18.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2020 compared with the same period in 2019 primarily due to decreased trading revenues within our agribusiness and energy services segment, offset slightly by higher production volumes of ethanol, distillers grains and corn oil in our ethanol production segment.

Operating loss decreased $11.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2020 compared with the same period last year primarily due to the ~~Fleischmann’s Vinegar acquisition~~sale of industrial-grade alcohol and ~~additional cattle margins, partially~~high protein animal feed products, offset by ~~decreased margins~~the pre-tax write-off of the goodwill in the ethanol ~~production.~~production segment. Adjusted EBITDA increased $58.4 million due to higher earnings from our ethanol production segment, excluding the goodwill impairment, driven by the sale of industrial-grade alcohol and high protein animal feed products as well as equity earnings from the GPCC joint venture. Interest expense ~~increased $20.1~~decreased $1.6 million for the three months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017,~~2020 compared with the same period in ~~2016, primarily due to $12.3 million in expense associated with the termination of previous credit facilities and higher average debt outstanding and borrowing costs.~~2019. Income tax benefit was ~~$48.8~~$55.7 million for the ~~three~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017,~~2020 compared with ~~income tax expense of $5.1~~$28.3 million for the same period in ~~2016~~2019. The increase in income tax benefit was primarily due to the ~~company’s recognition~~utilization of previously recorded tax ~~benefits related to R&D Credits.~~NOLS during the six month period ended June 30, 2020 as allowed under the provisions of the recently enacted CARES Act.

The following discussion provides greater detail about our ~~third quarter~~year-to-date segment performance.

Ethanol Production Segment

Key operating data for our ethanol production segment is as follows:


	Three Months Ended September 30,			Six Months Ended ‎June 30,
	2017	2016	% Variance	2020	2019	% Variance

Ethanol produced
Ethanol sold
(thousands of gallons)	313,642	292,238	7.3%	390,338	379,063	3.0
Distillers grains produced
Distillers grains sold
(thousands of equivalent dried tons)	817	790	3.4	1,025	984	4.2
Corn oil produced
Corn oil sold
(thousands of pounds)	75,440	72,176	4.5	102,048	88,023	15.9
Corn consumed
(thousands of bushels)	109,544	102,113	7.3	135,791	132,004	2.9

Agribusiness and Energy Services Segment

Revenues in our agribusiness and energy services segment decreased ~~$39.0~~$60.5 million while operating income decreased $6.7 million and EBITDA decreased by ~~$5.3~~$6.6 million for the ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017,~~2020 compared with the same period in ~~2016.~~2019. The decrease in revenues was primarily due to a decrease in ethanol, distillers grain and corn oil trading activity, ~~volumes, partially offset by higher~~as well as lower average realized prices for ~~distillers grain~~ethanol. Operating income and ~~increased intersegment distillers grain, marketing and corn revenues.~~ EBITDA decreased primarily as a result of decreased ~~trading activity. Depreciation expense increased~~margins.

Food and Ingredients Segment

The food and ingredients segment, which now represents food-grade corn oil production had no activity during the six months ended June 30, 2020.

Partnership Segment

Revenues generated by our partnership segment decreased $1.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2020, compared with the same period for 2019. Terminal services revenue decreased $0.9 million primarily as result of a decrease in fees associated with minimum volume commitments. Revenues generated from railcar transportation services decreased $0.6 million due to a reduction in average volumetric capacity provided, as well as lower sublease revenue. These decreases were partially offset by an increase of $0.2 million in trucking and other revenue associated with an increase in volumes transported for Green Plains Trade. Operating income decreased $1.1 million and EBITDA decreased $0.9 million for the ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017, primarily as a result of accelerated depreciation related to the disposition of fixed assets at our St. Edward, Nebraska location.~~

~~Food and Ingredients Segment~~

~~Revenues in our food and ingredients segment increased $98.6 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2017,~~2020 compared with the same period in ~~2016. The increase in~~2019.

Intersegment Eliminations

Intersegment eliminations of revenues was primarily due to the acquisitions of Fleischmann’s Vinegar and the cattle feedlots. The daily average company-owned cattle on feed for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, was approximately 100,000 and 65,000 head, respectively, and the daily average third-party owned cattle on feed for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, was approximately 59,000 and 1,400, respectively.

~~EBITDA increased~~decreased by ~~$29.3~~$0.4 million for the ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017,~~2020 compared with the same period in ~~2016 primarily due to the acquisition~~2019.

Corporate Activities

Operating income was impacted by an increase in operating expenses for corporate activities of ~~Fleischmann’s Vinegar as well as increased cattle margins.~~

~~Partnership Segment~~

~~Revenues generated by our partnership segment increased $3.3~~$1.3 million for the ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, 2017 compared to the same period of 2016, due to higher storage and throughput volumes, partially offset by a decrease in the average rate charged for the railcar volumetric capacity related to the rail transportation services agreement with Green Plains Trade, as well as lower throughput volumes under the terminal services agreements. EBITDA increased $4.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2017,2020 compared with the same period in ~~2016~~2019 due to ~~the~~ increased ~~storage and throughput revenues, as well as a decrease in operations and maintenance expenses of $0.6 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2017 compared with the same period of 2016.~~

~~Intersegment Eliminations~~

Intersegment eliminations of revenues increased by $19.9 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2017, compared with the same period in 2016 due to increased intersegment distillers grain and corn revenues paid to the ethanol production and agribusiness and energy services segments and the increase in storage and throughput fees paid to the partnership segment.

~~Corporate Activities~~

~~EBITDA decreased by $1.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2017, compared with the same period in 2016 due to increases in~~ selling, general and administrative expenses primarily ~~driven by salaries, insurance, rent, utilities and property taxes~~ as a result of ~~the Fleischmann’s Vinegar and cattle feedlot acquisitions.~~personnel costs.

Income Taxes

~~The~~We recorded income tax benefit ~~for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 was $60.9 million compared to $4.3~~of $55.7 million for the ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016. The change in income taxes~~2020, compared with $28.3 million for the ~~nine~~same period in 2019. The increase in the amount of tax benefit recorded for the six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017~~2020 compared to the same period in 2019 was ~~primarily~~ due to the ~~company’s recognition~~tax benefit associated with the carry back of the tax ~~benefits related~~NOL generated in 2019 to ~~R&D Credits.~~the 2014 tax year under the newly enacted CARES Act, as well as the release of a previously recorded valuation allowance against the 2019 NOL and other deferred tax assets.

~~A study was conducted to determine whether certain activities the company performs qualify~~Income from Equity Method Investees

Income from equity method investees increased $20.1 million for the ~~R&D credit allowed by~~six months ended June 30, 2020 compared with the ~~Internal Revenue Code Section 41. As a result of this study,~~same period last year due to earnings from our GPCC joint venture during the ~~company concluded these activities do qualify for the credit and determined it was appropriate~~current period. Prior to ~~claim the benefit of these credits for all open tax years. The company recognized these credits~~its disposition during the third quarter of ~~2017, along with~~2019, GPCC was a consolidated entity.

Net Income from Discontinued Operations

As previously discussed, we sold an ~~estimate~~aggregate 50% membership interest in GPCC to TGAM and StepStone during the third quarter of 2019. After closing, GPCC is no longer consolidated in the ~~credit~~company’s consolidated financial statements and the GPCC investment is accounted for ~~qualified activities year-to-date. The company will continue~~using the equity method of accounting. GPCC results for the six months ended June 30, 2019 are classified as discontinued operations. Net loss from discontinued operations was $2.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2019 primarily due to ~~evaluate eligibility for R&D credits on a regular basis.~~severe winter weather and abnormally negative basis during the first quarter of 2019.

‎

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Our principal sources of liquidity include cash generated from operating activities and bank credit facilities. We fund our operating expenses and service debt primarily with operating cash flows. Capital resources for maintenance and growth expenditures are funded by a variety of sources, including cash generated from operating activities, borrowings under bank credit facilities, or issuance of senior notes or equity. Our ability to access capital markets for debt under reasonable terms depends on our financial condition, credit ratings and market conditions. We believe that our ability to obtain financing at reasonable rates and history of consistent cash flow from operating activities provide a solid foundation to meet our future liquidity and capital resource requirements.

On ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017,~~2020, we had ~~$261.6~~$163.4 million in cash and equivalents, excluding restricted cash, ~~consisting~~consisting of ~~$201.3~~$72.1 million ~~available to~~held at our parent company and the remainder held at our subsidiaries. Additionally, we had $20.2 million in restricted cash at June 30, 2020. We also had ~~$297.0~~$294.0 million available under our committed revolving credit agreements, including $5.0 million available under the partnership’s revolving credit facility, some of which were subject to restrictions or other lending conditions. Funds at certain subsidiaries are generally required for their ongoing operational needs and restricted from distribution. At ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017,~~2020, our subsidiaries had approximately ~~$124.5~~$66.4 million of net assets that were not available to us in the form of dividends, loans or advances due to restrictions contained in their credit facilities. ~~As a result of the August 29, 2017~~ $500 million term loan agreement and related debt extinguishment at Green Plains Processing and Fleischmann’s Vinegar, we no longer consider certain subsidiaries to have restrictions on cash and asset distributions.

Net ~~cash used by operating activities was $122.2 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2017, compared with net~~ cash provided by operating activities for continuing operations was $65.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2020 compared with net cash used in operating activities for continuing operations of ~~$63.2~~$43.1 million for the same period in ~~2016.~~2019. Operating activities compared to the prior year were primarily affected by ~~an increase~~a decrease in ~~inventories~~the operating loss, goodwill impairment and derivative financial instruments and decreases in deferred income taxes and accounts payable and accrued liabilities, partially offset by decreases in accounts receivable and increases in noncurrent assets and liabilities for the nine months ended September 30, 2017. The changes in ~~deferred income taxes and noncurrent asset and liabilities were driven by~~working capital when compared to the ~~R&D credits recognized during~~same period of the ~~third quarter of 2017.~~prior year. Net cash used by

in investing activities for continuing operations was ~~$110.2~~$68.0 million for the ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, 2017, due primarily to acquisitions of the cattle feedlots, as well as capital expenditures at our existing ethanol plants and our vinegar operations. Net cash provided by financing activities was $189.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2017,2020 compared with ~~$248.8~~net cash used in investing activities for continuing operations of $16.9 million for the same period in ~~2016.~~2019, due primarily to an increase capital expenditures during 2020. Net cash used in financing activities for continuing operations was $84.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2020 compared with net cash provided by financing activities for continuing operations of $8.0 million for the same period in 2019, primarily due to changes in borrowing activity, a decrease in share repurchases and a decrease in cash dividends and distributions during 2020.

Additionally, Green Plains Trade ~~Green Plains Cattle~~ and Green Plains Grain use revolving credit facilities to finance working capital requirements. We frequently draw from and repay these facilities which results in significant cash movements reflected on a gross basis within financing activities as proceeds from and payments on short-term borrowings.

We incurred capital expenditures of ~~$37.7~~$64.6 million in the first ~~nine months~~half of ~~2017~~2020 primarily for Project 24 operating expense reduction and high-protein expansion projects at various ethanol plants, and for various maintenance ~~and expansion~~ projects. Capital spending for the remainder of ~~2017~~2020 is expected to be ~~approximately $11.9~~between $40.0 million and $55.0 million for various projects, ~~and investments in joint ventures are expected to be approximately $7.4 million,~~ including the high-protein expansion at Wood River, which are expected to be financed with available borrowings under our credit facilities and cash provided by operating ~~activities.~~activities, as well as borrowings under our recently secured project based financing of $75.0 million.

Our business is highly sensitive to the price of commodities, particularly for corn, ethanol, distillers grains, corn oil and natural ~~gas and cattle.~~gas. We use derivative financial instruments to reduce the market risk associated with fluctuations in commodity prices. Sudden changes in commodity prices may require cash deposits with brokers for margin calls or significant liquidity with little advanced notice to meet margin calls, depending on our open derivative positions. ~~On September 30, 2017, we~~ ~~had $52.5 million~~ ~~in deposits for broker margin requirements.~~ We continuously monitor our exposure to margin calls and believe we will continue to maintain adequate liquidity to cover margin calls from our operating results and borrowings.

We have paid a quarterly cash dividend since August 2013 and anticipate declaring a cash dividend in future quarters on a regular basis. Future declarations of dividends, however, are subject to board approval and may be adjusted as our liquidity, business needs or market conditions change. On August 16, 2017, our board of directors declared a quarterly cash dividend of $0.12 per share. The dividend was paid on September 15, 2017, to shareholders of record at the close of business on August 28, 2017.

For each calendar quarter commencing with the quarter ended September 30, 2015, the partnership agreement requires the partnership to distribute all available cash, as defined, to its partners, including us, within 45 days after the end of each calendar quarter. Available cash generally means all cash and cash equivalents on hand at the end of that quarter less cash reserves established by ~~our~~the general partner, including those for future capital expenditures, future acquisitions and anticipated future debt service requirements, plus all or any portion of the cash on hand resulting from working capital borrowings made subsequent to the end of that quarter. On ~~October 19, 2017,~~July 16, 2020, the board of directors of the general partner of the partnership declared a cash distribution of ~~$0.46~~$0.12 per unit on outstanding common and subordinated units. The distribution is payable on ~~November 10, 2017,~~August 7, 2020, to unitholders of record at the close of business on ~~November 3, 2017.~~July 31, 2020.

~~In August 2014, we announced~~
‎

Our board of directors authorized a share repurchase program of up to ~~$100~~ $200 million of our common stock. Under the program, we may repurchase shares in open market transactions, privately negotiated transactions, accelerated share buyback programs, tender offers or by other means. The timing and amount of repurchase transactions are determined by our management based on market conditions, share price, legal requirements and other factors. The program may be suspended, modified or discontinued at any time without prior notice. We did not repurchase any shares during the second quarter of 2020. To date, we have repurchased ~~335,849 shares~~7,396,936 of common stock for approximately ~~$5.7~~$92.8 million under the ~~program during the third quarter of 2017. To date, we have repurchased 850,839 shares of common stock for approximately $15.7 million under the~~ program.

We believe we have sufficient working capital for our existing operations. A continued sustained period of unprofitable operations, however, may strain our ~~liquidity making it difficult to maintain compliance with our financing arrangements.~~liquidity. We may sell additional assets or equity or borrow capital to improve or preserve our liquidity, expand our business or ~~build additional or~~ acquire ~~existing~~ businesses. We cannot provide assurance that we will be able to secure funding necessary for additional working capital or these projects at reasonable terms, if at all.

Debt

For additional information related to our debt, see Note 89 – Debt included as part of the notes to consolidated financial statements and Note 1112 – Debt included as part of the notes to consolidated financial statements included in our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, ~~2016.~~2019.

We were in compliance with our debt covenants at ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017.~~2020. Based on our forecasts, ~~and the current margin environment,~~ we believe we will maintain compliance at each of our subsidiaries for the next twelve months or have sufficient liquidity available on a consolidated basis to resolve noncompliance. We cannot provide assurance that actual results will approximate our forecasts or that we will inject the necessary capital into a subsidiary to maintain compliance with its respective covenants. In the event a subsidiary is unable to comply with its debt covenants, the subsidiary’s lenders

may determine that an event of default has occurred, and following notice, the lenders may terminate the commitment and declare the unpaid balance due and payable.

~~Corporate Activities~~

~~On August 29, 2017, the company and substantially all of the company’s subsidiaries, but not including Green Plains Partners and~~As outlined in Note 9 - Debt, we use LIBOR as a reference rate for certain other entities as guarantors, entered into a $500 million term loan agreement (the “Term Loan Agreement”) with BNP Paribas, as administrative agent and collateral agent (the “Term Loan Agent”) and certain other financial institutions, which matures on August 29, 2023, and mayrevolving credit facilities. LIBOR is currently set to be prepaid at any time without premium or penalty other than customary breakage costs with respect to Eurodollar-based loans or certain other limited circumstances in which event a 1.0% prepayment premium would be due.

The Term Loan Agreement requires principal payments of $1.25 million on the last day of each quarter, beginning on December 31, 2017, with a final installment payable on August 29, 2023, equal to the unpaid principal and interest balances of the Term Loan Agreement. Beginningphased out at the end of ~~2018, mandatory prepayments must~~2021. At this time, it is not possible to predict the effect of this change or the alternative reference rate to be ~~made~~used. We will need to renegotiate certain credit facilities to determine the interest rate to replace LIBOR with the new standard that is established. As such, the potential effect of any such event on interest expense cannot yet be determined.

Corporate Activities

In 2019, we issued $115.0 million of 4.00% convertible senior notes due in 2024, or the 4.00% notes. The 4.00% notes are senior, unsecured obligations, with interest payable on January 1 and July 1 of each year, beginning January 1, 2020, at a rate of 4.00% per annum. The initial conversion rate will be 64.1540 shares of our common stock per $1,000 principal amount of the 4.00% notes, which is equivalent to an ~~annual basis at various percentages~~initial conversion price of ~~excess~~approximately $15.59 per share of our common stock. The conversion rate will be subject to adjustment upon the occurrence of certain events. In addition, we may be obligated to increase the conversion rate for any conversion that occurs in connection with certain corporate events, including our calling the 4.00% notes for redemption. We may settle the 4.00% notes in cash, ~~flow depending~~common stock or a combination of cash and common stock. At June 30, 2020, the outstanding principal balance was $86.2 million on the total first lien leverage ratio as defined in the Term Loan Agreement. The Term Loan Agreement will bear interest at a variable rate per annum at the Company’s election, equal to (a) the applicable LIBOR rate, subject to a 1.00% floor, plus 5.50% or (b) a base rate equal to 4.50% plus the greater of (i) the Federal Funds Rate plus 0.50%, (ii) the Prime Rate, or (iii) one month LIBOR plus 1.00%.4.00% notes.

The Term Loan Agreement is guaranteed by the Company and the Term Loan Obligors, and secured by substantially all of the assets of the Company and the Term Loan Obligors, including 17 ethanol production facilities with annual capacity of approximately 1.5 billion gallons, as well as the vinegar production facilities. The covenants of the Term Loan Agreement require the Company to maintain a maximum term debt to total term capitalization, each as defined in the Term Loan Agreement, at the end of each fiscal quarter of not more than 55.0% and a minimum interest coverage ratio, as defined, at the end of each fiscal quarter of not less than 1.25 to 1.0.

The Term Loan Agreement provides for customary events of default, which include (subject in certain cases to customary grace and cure periods), among others, the following: nonpayment of principal or interest; breach of covenants or other agreements in the Term Loan Agreement; defaults in failure to pay certain other indebtedness; and certain events of bankruptcy or insolvency. If any event of default occurs, the remaining principal balance and accrued interest on the Term Loan Agreement will become immediately due and payable.

In August 2016, we issued $170.0 million of 4.125% convertible senior notes due in 2022, or 4.125% notes, which are senior, unsecured obligations with interest payable on March 1 and September 1 of each year. Prior to March 1, 2022, the 4.125% notes are not convertible unless certain conditions are satisfied. The initial conversion rate is 35.7143 shares of common stock per $1,000 of principal which is equal to a conversion price of approximately $28.00 per share. The conversion rate is subject to adjustment upon the occurrence of certain events, including when the quarterly cash dividend exceeds $0.12 per share. We may settle the 4.125% notes in cash, common stock or a combination of cash and common stock.

~~In September 2013, we issued $120.0~~ At June 30, 2020, the outstanding principal balance was $152.8 million of 3.25% convertible senior notes due in 2018, or 3.25% notes, which are senior, unsecured obligations with interest payable on April 1 and October 1 of each year. Prior to April 1, 2018, the 3.25% notes are not convertible unless certain conditions are satisfied. The conversion rate is subject to adjustment upon the occurrence of certain events, including when the quarterly cash dividend exceeds $0.04 per share. The conversion rate was recently adjusted as of September 30, ~~2017 to 49.9981 shares of common stock per $1,000 of principal, which is equal to a conversion price of approximately $20.00 per share.~~ ~~We may settle the 3.25% notes in cash, common stock or a combination of cash and common stock.~~

During the second quarter of 2017, we entered into several privately negotiated agreements with holders, on behalf of certain beneficial owners of our 3.25% notes. Under these agreements, 2,783,725 shares of our common stock and approximately $8.5 million in cash plus accrued but unpaid interest on the ~~3.25% notes, were exchanged for approximately $56.3 million in aggregate principal amount of the 3.25%~~4.125% notes. ~~Common stock held as treasury shares were exchanged for the 3.25% notes. Following the closings of the agreements, $63.7 million aggregate principal amount of the 3.25% notes remain outstanding.~~

At issuance, we separately accounted for the liability and equity components of the convertible notes by bifurcating the gross proceeds between the indebtedness, or liability component, and the embedded conversion option, or equity component. This bifurcation was done by estimating an effective interest rate on the date of issuance for similar notes. The embedded

~~conversion option was recorded in stockholders’ equity. Since we did not exercise the embedded conversion option associated with the notes, pursuant to the guidance within ASC Topic 470,~~ ~~Debt~~, we recorded a loss upon extinguishment measured by the difference between the fair value and carrying value of the liability portion of the notes. As a result, we recorded a charge to interest expense in the consolidated financial statements of approximately $1.3 million during the three months ended June 30, 2017. This charge also included $0.6 million of unamortized debt issuance costs related to the principal balance extinguished. The remaining settlement consideration transferred was allocated to the reacquisition of the embedded conversion option and recognized as a reduction of additional paid-in capital.

Ethanol Production Segment

We have small equipment financing loans, ~~capital~~finance leases on equipment or facilities, and other forms of debt financing.

‎

Agribusiness and Energy Services Segment

Green Plains Grain has a $125.0 million senior secured asset-based revolving credit facility to finance working capital up to the maximum commitment based on eligible collateral. The facility matures in July of 2019. This facility can be increased by up to $75.0 million with agent approval and up to $50.0 million for seasonal borrowings. Total commitments outstanding under the facility cannot exceed $250.0 million. At September 30, 2017, the outstanding principal balance was $64.0 million on the facility and the interest rate was 6.25%.

Green Plains Trade has a $300.0 million senior secured asset-based revolving credit facility to finance working capital up to the maximum commitment based on eligible ~~collateral. The facility~~collateral, which matures in July of 2022. This facility can be increased by up to $70.0 million with agent approval. ~~At September 30, 2017, the outstanding principal balance was $143.3 million on the facility and the interest rate was 3.52%.~~

On July 28, 2017, we amended the credit facility, to increase the maximum commitment from $150.0 million to $300.0 million and extend the maturity date to July 28, 2022. The amended credit facility increases advance rates and modifies the eligible inventory definitions to include additional commodities and locations. Advances are subject to variable interest rates equal to a daily LIBOR rate plus 2.25% or the base rate plus 1.25%. The unused portion of the credit facility is also subject to a commitment fee of 0.375% per annum. At June 30, 2020, the outstanding principal balance was $50.2 million on the facility and the interest rate was 2.42%.

~~Food and Ingredients Segment~~

Green Plains ~~Cattle~~Grain has a ~~$300.0~~$100.0 million senior secured asset-based revolving credit facility to finance working capital up to the maximum commitment based on eligible ~~collateral. The facility~~collateral, which matures in ~~April~~June of ~~2020.~~2022. This facility can be ~~increase~~increased by up to ~~$100.0~~$75.0 million with agent ~~approval.~~approval and up to $50.0 million for seasonal borrowings. Total commitments outstanding under the facility cannot exceed $225.0 million. At ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017,~~2020, the outstanding principal balance was ~~$246.7~~$60.8 million on the facility and the interest rate was 3.31%.

Green Plains Grain has entered into short-term inventory financing agreements with a financial institution. At June 30, 2020, 2.3 million bushels of corn had been designated as collateral under these agreements at initial values totaling $9.0 million. The company has accounted for the agreements as short-term notes, rather than sales, and has elected the fair value option to offset fluctuations in market prices of the inventory. At June 30, 2020, the short-term notes payable were valued at $9.5 million and our interest rate was ~~3.83%~~3.04%.

On April 28, 2017, we amended the credit facility to fund the additional working capital requirements related to the acquisition of two cattle feedlots located in Leoti, Kansas and Yuma, Colorado. The amendment increased the maximum commitment from $100.0Green Plains Commodity Management has an uncommitted $30.0 million ~~to $200.0 million until July 31, 2017, at which time it increased to $300.0 million. The maturity date was extended from October 31, 2017 to April 30, 2020.~~

~~Advances under the~~ revolving credit facility ~~as amended,~~which matures April 30, 2023 to finance margins related to its hedging programs. Advances are subject to variable interest rates equal to LIBOR plus ~~2.0% to 3.0% or~~1.75%. At June 30, 2020, the ~~base rate plus 1.0% to 2.0%, depending~~outstanding principal balance was $10.9 million on the ~~preceding three months’ excess borrowing availability. The amended credit~~ facility ~~also includes an accordion feature that enables~~and the credit facility to be increased by up to $100.0 million with agent approval. The unused portion of the credit facility is also subject to a commitment fee of 0.20% to 0.30% per annum, depending on the preceding three months’ excess borrowing availability. Interest is payable as required, but not less than quarterly in arrears and principal is due upon maturity. interest rate was 1.85%.

The amended terms impose affirmative and negative covenants, including maintaining working capital of 15% of the commitment amount, tangible net worth of 20% of the commitment amount and a total debt to tangible net worth ratio of 3.50x. Capital expenditures are limited to $10.0 million per year under the credit facility, plus $10.0 million per year if funded by a contribution from the parent, plus unused amounts from the previous year.

Partnership Segment

Green Plains Partners, through a wholly owned subsidiary, has a ~~$155.0~~$135.0 million ~~secured~~credit facility comprised of a $130.0 million term loan and a $5.0 million revolving credit facility to fund working capital, acquisitions, distributions, capital expenditures and other general partnership ~~purposes as of September 30, 2017.~~purposes. The credit facility ~~can be increased by up~~was amended on June 4, 2020, decreasing the total amount available from $200.0 million to ~~$100.0 million without the consent of the~~ ~~lenders.~~$135.0 million. The amended credit facility matures ~~in July of~~

~~2020.~~ on December 31, 2021. At ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017,~~2020, the outstanding principal balance of the facility was ~~$129.0~~$130.0 million, with $5.0 million available on the ~~facility~~revolver, and an ~~average~~ interest rate was ~~3.74%~~6.25%.

~~On October 27, 2017,~~In certain situations we are required to make prepayments on the ~~partnership upsized its revolving~~outstanding principal balance on the credit facility. If at any time our cash balance exceeds $2.5 million for more than five consecutive business days, prepayments of outstanding principal are required in an amount equal to the excess cash. We are also required to prepay outstanding principal on the credit facility ~~by $40 million,~~with 100% of net cash proceeds from ~~$155 million to $195 million, by accessing a portion of the $100 million incremental commitment in place~~any asset disposition or recovery event. Any prepayments on the ~~facility. For more information related to our debt, see~~ ~~Note 8 – Debt~~term loan are applied to the ~~consolidated financial statements~~remaining principal balance in ~~this report.~~inverse order of maturity, including the final payment.

We use LIBOR as a reference rate for our credit facility. LIBOR is set to be phased out at the end of 2021. It is unclear if LIBOR will cease to exist at that time or if new methods of calculating LIBOR will be established such that it continues to exist after 2021. We may need to amend our credit facility to determine the interest rate to replace LIBOR with the new standard that is established. The potential effect of any such event on interest expense cannot yet be determined.

‎

Contractual Obligations

Contractual obligations as of ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017,~~2020 were as follows (in thousands):


		Payments Due By Period										Payments Due By Period
Contractual Obligations		Total	Less Than 1 Year		1-3 Years		3-5 Years		More Than 5 Years			Total	Less Than ‎1 Year		1-3 Years		3-5 Years		More Than ‎5 Years

Long-term and short-term debt obligations (1)	$	1,348,440	$	464,250	$	204,787	$	12,012	$	667,391	$	562,577	$	168,072	$	264,347	$	115,653	$	14,505
Interest and fees on debt obligations (2)		349,038		78,153		113,564		102,467		54,854		58,718		23,125		22,411		6,687		6,495
Operating lease obligations (3)		100,397		32,247		36,837		12,887		18,426		76,669		17,885		22,857		12,440		23,487
Other		9,042		2,722		1,403		2,398		2,519		10,618		2,232		6,631		604		1,151
Purchase obligations:
Forward grain purchase contracts (4)		212,750		199,622		9,961		2,000		1,167		72,555		70,160		2,000		395		-
Other commodity purchase contracts (5)		241,695		230,687		11,008		-		-		85,814		67,302		18,397		115		-
Other		490		331		159		-		-		391		199		192		-		-
Total contractual obligations	$	2,261,852	$	1,008,012	$	377,719	$	131,764	$	744,357	$	867,342	$	348,975	$	336,835	$	135,894	$	45,638

programs and policies. Distillers grains prices are impacted by livestock numbers on feed, prices for feed alternatives and supply, which is associated with ethanol plant production. Natural gas prices are influenced by severe weather in the summer and winter and hurricanes in the spring, summer and fall. Other factors include North American energy exploration and production, and the amount of natural gas in underground storage during injection and withdrawal seasons. Ethanol prices are sensitive to world crude oil supply and demand, the price of crude oil, gasoline and corn, the price of substitute fuels, refining capacity and utilization, government regulation and consumer demand for alternative fuels. Distillers grains prices are impacted by livestock numbers on feed, prices for feed alternatives and supply, which is associated with ethanol plant production. Cattle prices are impacted by weather conditions, overall economic conditions and government regulations.

To reduce the risk associated with fluctuations in the price of ethanol, corn, ~~natural gas, ethanol,~~ distillers grains, corn oil, and ~~cattle,~~natural gas, at times we use forward fixed-price physical contracts and derivative financial instruments, such as futures and options executed on the Chicago Board of Trade, ~~and~~ the New York Mercantile Exchange and the Chicago Mercantile Exchange. We focus on locking in favorable operating margins, when available, using a model that continually monitors market prices for corn, natural gas and other inputs relative to the price for ethanol and distillers grains at each of our production facilities. We create offsetting positions using a combination of forward fixed-price purchases, sales contracts and derivative financial instruments. As a result, we frequently have gains on derivative financial instruments that are offset by losses on forward fixed-price physical contracts or inventories and vice versa. Our results are impacted by a mismatch of gains or losses associated with the derivative instrument during a reporting period when the physical commodity purchases or sale has not yet occurred. During the three and ~~nine~~ six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017,~~2020, revenues included net losses of ~~$2.5~~$15.6 million and ~~$7.6~~net gains $38.6 million, respectively, and cost of goods sold included net gains of ~~$3.0~~$9.7 million and ~~$23.9~~$12.2 million, respectively, associated with derivative financial instruments.

Ethanol Production Segment

In the ethanol production segment, net gains and losses from settled derivative instruments are offset by physical commodity purchases or sales to achieve the intended operating margins. To reduce commodity price risk caused by market fluctuations, we enter into exchange-traded futures and options contracts that serve as economic hedges.

Our exposure to market risk, which includes the impact of our risk management activities resulting from our fixed-price purchase and sale contracts and derivatives, is based on the estimated net income effect resulting from a hypothetical 10% change in price for the next 12 months starting on ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017, are~~2020, which is as follows (in thousands):


Commodity	Estimated Total Volume Requirements for the Next 12 Months (1)	Unit of Measure	Net Income Effect of Approximate 10% Change in Price		Estimated Total Volume ‎ Requirements for the ‎ Next 12 Months (1)	Unit of ‎Measure	Net Income Effect of ‎ Approximate 10% ‎Change in Price

Ethanol	1,470,000	Gallons	$	118,305	1,123,000	Gallons	$	101,107
Corn	524,000	Bushels	$	121,574	387,000	Bushels	$	95,200
Distillers grains	4,100	Tons (2)	$	23,993	2,900	Tons (2)	$	25,902
Corn Oil	340,000	Pounds	$	6,487
Corn oil					292,000	Pounds	$	5,628
Natural gas	41,700	MmBTU	$	5,900	31,200	MmBTU	$	5,051

Our daily net commodity position consists of inventories related to purchase and sale contracts and exchange-traded contracts. The fair value of our position ~~subject to market risk~~ was approximately ~~$3.5~~$0.5 million for ~~cattle based on market prices~~grain at ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017.~~2020. Our market risk at that date, based on the estimated net income effect resulting from a hypothetical 10% change in price, was approximately ~~$0.2 million.~~$37 thousand.

~~Our~~ ~~daily net commodity position consists of inventories related to purchase and sale contracts and exchange-traded~~ contracts. The fair value of our position subject to market risk was approximately $17.8 million for gain and other cattle feed based on market prices at September 30, 2017. Our market risk at that date, based on the estimated net income effect resulting from a hypothetical 10% change in price, was approximately $1.1 million.

Item 4. Controls and Procedures.

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

We maintain disclosure controls and procedures designed to ensure information that must be disclosed in the reports we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to management, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required financial disclosure. In designing and evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures, management recognizes that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives. Management is required to apply its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures.

Under the supervision of and participation of our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, management carried out an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017,~~2020 as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act and concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of our financial reporting and the preparation of our consolidated financial statements for external purposes in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. There were no material changes in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by this report that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

‎

Table of Contents

PART II – OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings.

We are currently involved in litigation that has arisen during the ordinary course of business. We do not believe this litigation will have a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

Item 1A. Risk Factors.

Investors should carefully consider the discussion of risks and the other information in our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, ~~2016,~~2019, in Part I, Item 1A, “Risk Factors,” and the discussion of risks and other information in Part I, Item 2, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” under “Cautionary Information Regarding Forward-Looking Statements,” of this report. Investors should also carefully consider the discussion of risks with the partnership under the heading “Risk Factors” and other information in their annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, ~~2016.~~2019. Although we have attempted to discuss key factors, our investors need to be aware that other risks may prove to be important in the future. New risks may emerge at any time and we cannot predict such risks or estimate the extent to which they may affect our financial performance. The following risk ~~factor supplements~~factors supplement and/or ~~updates~~update risk factors previously disclosed and should be considered in conjunction with the other information included in, or incorporated by reference in, this quarterly report on Form 10-Q.

~~Government mandates affecting ethanol usage could change and impact the ethanol market.~~

Our ~~operations could~~business may be adversely impacted by ~~legislation~~the recent COVID-19 outbreak.

The outbreak of the coronavirus, or ~~EPA~~COVID-19, which has been declared by the World Health Organization to be a pandemic, has spread across the globe and continues to impact worldwide economic activity. COVID-19 poses a risk on all aspects of our business, including how it will impact our employees, customers, vendors, and business partners. We are unable to predict the impact that COVID-19 will have on our future financial position and operating results, due to numerous uncertainties. These uncertainties include, but are not limited to:

the severity of the virus;

the duration of the outbreak;

federal, state or local governmental regulations or other actions which could include limitations on our operations;

the effect on customer demand resulting in a decline in the demand for our products;

impacts on our supply chain and potential limitations of supply of our feedstocks;

interruptions of our distribution systems and delays in the delivery of our products;

the closure or extended shutdown of one or more major cattle packing plants, leading to depressed cattle prices or the inability in extreme cases to process such cattle;

the health of our workforce, and our ability to meet staffing needs which is vital to our operations; and

volatility in the credit and financial markets.

The COVID-19 pandemic and related economic repercussions have created significant volatility, uncertainty, and turmoil in the energy industry. We are unable to predict the overall impact these events will have on our future financial position and operations.

We continue to actively manage our response in collaboration with customers, government officials, team members and business partners and assessing potential impacts to our future financial position and operating results, as well as adverse developments in our business. It is not possible for us to predict whether there will be additional government-mandated shelter-in-place and similar government orders that could affect our business, how long the existing orders will remain in place, and how these measures will impact our operations.

‎

Table of Contents

The ability or willingness of OPEC and other oil exporting nations to set ~~forth below~~and maintain production levels has a significant impact on oil and natural gas commodity prices.

The Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries and their allies (collectively, OPEC+), is an intergovernmental organization that seeks to manage the price and supply of oil on the global energy market. Actions taken by OPEC+ members, including those taken alongside other oil exporting nations, have a significant impact on global oil supply and pricing. For example, OPEC+ and certain other oil exporting nations have previously agreed to take measures, including production cuts, to support crude oil prices. In March 2020, members of OPEC+ considered extending and potentially increasing these oil production cuts, however these negotiations were unsuccessful. As a result, Saudi Arabia announced an immediate reduction in export prices and Russia announced that all previously agreed oil production cuts will expire on April 1, 2020. These actions led to an immediate and steep decrease in oil prices. There can be no assurance that OPEC+ members and other oil exporting nations will agree to future production cuts or ~~otherwise,~~other actions to support and stabilize oil prices, nor can there be any assurance that ~~may~~they will not further reduce oil prices or increase production. Uncertainty regarding future actions to be taken by OPEC+ members or other oil exporting countries could lead to increased volatility in the ~~RFS II mandate. Similarly, should~~price of oil, which could adversely affect our business, future financial condition and results of operations.

Future demand for ethanol is uncertain and changes in federal mandates, ~~regarding oxygenated gasoline be repealed,~~public perception, consumer acceptance and overall consumer demand for transportation fuel could affect demand.

While many trade groups, academics and government agencies support ethanol as a fuel additive that promotes a cleaner environment, others claim ethanol production consumes considerably more energy, emits more greenhouse gases than other fuels and depletes water resources. While we do not agree, some studies suggest ethanol produced from corn is less efficient than ethanol produced from switch grass or wheat grain. Others claim corn-based ethanol negatively impacts consumers by causing the ~~market~~prices of meat and other food derived from corn-consuming livestock to increase. Ethanol critics also contend the industry redirects corn supplies from international food markets to domestic fuel markets, and contributes to land use change domestically and abroad.

There are limited markets for ~~domestic~~ ethanol could be adversely impacted. Economic incentives to blend based on the relative value of gasoline versus ethanol, taking into consideration the octane value of ethanol, environmental requirements and the RFS II mandate, may affect future demand. A significant increase in supply beyond the ~~RFS II mandate could have an adverse impact on~~federal mandates. We believe further consumer acceptance of E15 and E85 fuels may be necessary before ethanol ~~prices. Moreover, changes to RFS II could negatively impact~~can achieve significant market share growth. Discretionary and E85 blending are important secondary markets. Discretionary blending is often determined by the price of ethanol ~~or cause imported sugarcane~~relative to gasoline, and availability to consumers. When discretionary blending is financially unattractive, the demand for ethanol may be reduced.

Demand for ethanol is also affected by overall demand for transportation fuel, which is affected by cost, number of miles traveled and vehicle fuel economy. Miles traveled typically increases during the spring and summer months related to ~~become more economical than domestic ethanol.~~

~~Flexible-fuel vehicles, which are designed~~vacation travel, followed closely behind the fall season due to ~~run on a mixture of fuels~~holiday travel. Global events, such as ~~E85, are eligible for vehicle manufacturer incentives~~COVID-19, have greatly decreased miles traveled and in turn, the form of CAFE credits. Flexible-fuel vehicle credits have been decreasing since 2014 and will be completely phased out by 2020, which may impact manufacturers’ willingness to continue building flexible-fuel vehicles and ultimately result in slower E85 growth and lower ethanol prices.

~~Under the provisions of the EISA, Congress established a mandate setting the minimum volume of renewable fuels that must be blended with gasoline under the RFS II, which affects the domestic market~~demand for ethanol. ~~The EPA has the authority to waive the requirements, in whole~~Consumer demand for gasoline may be impacted by emerging transportation trends, such as electric vehicles or in part, if there is inadequate domestic renewable fuel supply or the requirement severely harms the economy or the environment. After 2022, volumes shall be determined by the EPA in coordination with the Secretaries of Energy and Agriculture, taking into account such factors as impact on environment, energy security, future rates of production, cost to consumers, infrastructure, and otherride sharing. Additionally, factors such as over-supply of ethanol, which has been the case for some time, could continue to negatively impact our business. Reduced demand for ethanol may depress the value of our products, erode its margins, and reduce our ability to generate revenue or operate profitably.

Our insurance policies do not cover all losses, costs or liabilities that we may experience, and insurance companies that currently insure companies in the energy industry may cease to do so or substantially increase premiums.

We are insured under property, liability and business interruption policies, subject to the deductibles and limits under those policies. We have acquired insurance that we believe to be adequate to prevent loss from material foreseeable risks. However, events may occur for which no insurance is available or for which insurance is not available on ~~commodity prices, job creation, rural economic development,~~terms that are acceptable. Loss from an event, such as, but not limited to war, riots, pandemics, terrorism or ~~impact~~other risks, may not be insured and such a loss may have a material adverse effect on ~~food prices.~~our operations, cash flows and financial position.

~~On July 5, 2017,~~Certain of our ethanol production plants and our related storage tanks, as well as certain of our fuel terminal facilities are located within recognized seismic and flood zones. We believe that the ~~EPA proposed maintaining~~design of these facilities have been modified to fortify them to meet structural requirements for those regions of the ~~RVOs~~country. We have also obtained additional insurance coverage specific to earthquake and flood risks for ~~conventional~~the applicable plants and fuel terminals. However, there is no assurance that any such facility would remain in operation if a seismic or flood event were to occur.

Additionally, our ability to obtain and maintain adequate insurance may be adversely affected by conditions in the insurance market over which we have no control. In addition, if we experience insurable events, our annual premiums could increase further or insurance may not be available at all. If significant changes in the number or financial solvency of insurance underwriters for the ethanol industry occur, we may be unable to obtain and maintain adequate insurance at ~~15.0 billion gallons while lowering the volume obligations for advanced alternatives, reducing the overall biofuel target to 19.24 billion gallons for 2018. On September 26, 2017, the EPA issued~~ a ~~Notice~~

Table of Data Availability for comment, proposing to further reduce the 2018 advanced biofuel volume requirement by 315 mmg, to 3.77 billion gallons, and the total renewable fuel requirement to 18.77 billion gallons, leaving conventional ethanol at 15.0 billion gallons. According to RFS II, if mandatory renewable fuel volumes are reduced by at least 20% for two consecutive years, the EPA is required to modify, or reset, statutory volumes through 2022. Since 2018 is the first year the total proposed RVOs are more than 20% below statutory levels, the EPA Administrator directed his staff to initiate the required technical analysis to perform any future reset consistent with the reset rules. If 2019 RVOs are also more than 20% below statutory levels, the RVO resetContents

reasonable cost. We cannot assure our unitholders that we will be ~~triggered under RFS II and the EPA~~able to renew our insurance coverage on acceptable terms, if at all, or that we will be ~~required~~able to ~~modify statutory volumes through 2022 within~~arrange for adequate alternative coverage in the event of non-renewal. The occurrence of an event that is not fully covered by insurance, the failure by one ~~year~~or more insurers to honor its commitments for an insured event or the loss of insurance coverage could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations, cash flows and ability of the ~~trigger event, based on the same factors used~~partnership to ~~set the RVOs post-2022.~~

~~The U.S. Federal District Court for the D.C. Circuit ruled on July 28, 2017, in favor of the Americans for Clean Energy and its petitioners against the EPA related~~make distributions to its decision to lower the 2016 volume requirements. The Court concluded the EPA erred in how it interpreted the “inadequate domestic supply” waiver provision of RFS II, which authorizes the EPA to consider supply-side factors affecting the volume of renewable fuel available to refiners, blenders, and importers to meet theunitholders.

statutory volume requirements. The waiver provision does not allow the EPA to consider the volume of renewable fuel available to consumers or the demand-side constraints that affect the consumption of renewable fuel by consumers. As a result, the Court vacated the EPA’s decision to reduce the total renewable fuel volume requirements for 2016 through its waiver authority, which the EPA is expected to address. We believe this decision will benefit the industry overall, with the EPA's waiver analysis now limited to supply considerations only, and expect the primary impact will be on the RINs market.

On October 19, 2017, EPA Administrator Pruitt issued letter to seven Senators from Midwestern States reiterating his commitment to the text and spirit of the RFS. He stated that the EPA will meet the November 30, 2017 deadline for issuing RVOs, that the EPA’s preliminary analysis suggests that final RVOs should be set at amounts at or greater than those provided on July 5, 2017, that EPA is actively exploring its authority to issue an RVP waiver and EPA will be pursuing action on RINs that involves ethanol exports.

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.

Employees surrender shares when restricted stock grants are vested to satisfy statutory minimum required payroll tax withholding obligations.

The following table lists the shares that were surrendered during the ~~third~~second quarter of ~~2017.~~2020:

Period

Total Number of
Shares Withheld for
Employee Awards

Average Price
Paid per Share
July 1 - July 31

-

$
-
August 1 - August 30

1,565

17.07
September 1 - September 30

15,022

18.49
Total

16,587

$
18.36


Period	Total Number of ‎ Shares Withheld for ‎Employee Awards	Average Price ‎Paid per Share
April 1 - April 30	-	$	-
May 1 - May 31	9,523		7.13
June 1 - June 30	-		-
Total	9,523	$	7.13

~~In August 2014, we announced~~Our board of directors authorized a share repurchase program of up to ~~$100~~$200 million of our common stock. Under this program, we may repurchase shares in open market transactions, privately negotiated transactions, accelerated buyback programs, tender offers or by other means. The timing and amount of the transactions are determined by management based on its evaluation of market conditions, share price, legal requirements and other factors. The program may be suspended, modified or discontinued at any time, without prior notice.

~~The following table lists~~ We did not repurchase any shares during the second quarter of 2020. Since inception, the company has repurchased 7,396,936 shares ~~repurchased~~of common stock for approximately $92.8 million under the ~~share repurchase program during the third quarter of 2017.~~program.

Period

Number of
Shares
Repurchased

Average Price
Paid per Share

Total Number of Shares
Repurchased as Part of
Repurchase Program

Approximate Dollar Value of
Shares that may yet be
Repurchased under the Program
(in thousands)
July 1 - July 31

-

$
-

514,990

$
89,993
August 1 - August 30

285,849

17.10

800,839

85,097
September 1 - September 30

50,000

16.70

850,839

84,260
Total

335,849

$
17.04

850,839

$
84,260

Item 3. Defaults ~~upon~~Upon Senior Securities.

None.

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures.

Not applicable.

Item 5. Other Information.

~~Revolving Credit Facility Upsizing~~None.

On October 27, 2017, the partnership upsized its revolving credit facility by $40 million, from $155 million to $195 million, accessing a portion of the $100 million incremental commitment in place on the facility. The credit increase is in accordance with the Incremental Joinder Agreement, which is filed as Exhibit 10.8 to this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and incorporated herein by reference.

‎

Table of Contents

Item 6. Exhibits.

Exhibit Index



~~Exhibit No.~~	~~Description of Exhibit~~
Exhibit No.	Description of Exhibit
10.1	Fourth ~~Amended and Restated Revolving~~Amendment to Credit ~~and Security~~ Agreement, dated ~~July 28, 2017,~~June 4, 2020, by and among Green Plains ~~Trade Group~~Operating Company LLC, as the ~~Lenders~~Borrower, the subsidiaries of the Borrower identified therein, Bank of America, N.A. and ~~PNC Bank, National Association as Lender and Agent (Incorporated~~the other lenders party thereto (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the company’s Current Report on Form 8-K ~~dated July 31, 2017)~~filed on June 4, 2020)
~~10.2(a)~~31.1	Term Loan Agreement, dated as of August 29, 2017, among Green Plains Inc., BNP Paribas, as administrative agent and collateral agent and BNP Paribas Securities Corp., BMO Capital Markets Corp. and Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated, as joint lead arrangers and joint book runners (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1(a) to the company’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated August 29, 2017)
~~10.2(b)~~	Guaranty, dated as of August 29, 2017, in favor of BNP Paribas, as collateral agent and administrative agent, and the other lenders party to the Term Loan Agreement (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1(b) to the company’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated August 29, 2017)
~~10.2(c)~~	Pledge Agreement, dated as of August 29, 2017, among Green Plains Inc., its subsidiaries and BNP Paribas, as collateral agent (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1(c) to the company’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated August 29, 2017)
~~10.2(d)~~	Security Agreement, dated as of August 29, 2017, among Green Plains Inc., its subsidiaries and BNP Paribas, as collateral agent (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1(d) to the company’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated August 29, 2017)
~~10.2(e)~~	Term Loan Intercreditor and Collateral Agency Agreement, dated as of August 29, 2017, among BNP Paribas, as Term Loan Collateral Agent, BNP Paribas, as Pari Passu Collateral Agent, Bank of the West and ING Capital LLC, as ABL-Cattle Agent, BNP Paribas, as ABL-Grain Agent, PNC Bank, National Association, as ABL-Trade Agent, and acknowledged by Green Plains Inc. and new grantors (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1(e) to the company’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated August 29, 2017)
~~10.3(a)~~	Fourth Amendment to the Credit Agreement, dated as of August 29, 2017, among Green Plains Cattle Company LLC, Bank of the West and ING Capital LLC, as Joint Administrative Agents, and the lenders party to the Credit Agreement (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2(a) to the company’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated August 29, 2017)
~~10.3(b)~~	ABL Intercreditor Agreement, dated as of August 29, 2017, among Bank of the West and ING Capital LLC, as Joint ABL Collateral Agent, and BNP Paribas, as Term Loan Collateral Agent, and acknowledged by Green Plains Cattle Company LLC and the other ABL Grantors (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2(b) to the company’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated August 29, 2017)
~~10.3(c)~~	Guaranty, dated as of August 29, 2017, in favor of Bank of the West and ING Capital LLC, as joint administrative agents (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2(c) to the company’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated August 29, 2017)
~~10.4(a)~~	Eighth Amendment to Credit Agreement, dated as of August 29, 2017, among Green Plains Grain Company and BNP Paribas, as Administrative Agent, and the lenders party to the Credit Agreement (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3(a) to the company’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated August 29, 2017)
~~10.4(b)~~	ABL Intercreditor Agreement, dated as of August 29, 2017, among BNP Paribas, as ABL Collateral Agent, and BNP Paribas, as Term Loan Collateral Agent, and acknowledged by Green Plains Grain Company LLC and the other ABL Grantors (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3(b) to the company’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated August 29, 2017)
~~10.4(c)~~	Guaranty, dated as of August 29, 2017, in favor of BNP Paribas, as administrative agent (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3(c) to the company’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated August 29, 2017)
~~10.5(a)~~	First Amendment to Fourth Amended and Restated Revolving Credit and Security Agreement, dated as of August 29, 2017, among Green Plains Trade Group LLC and PNC Bank, National Association, as agent, and the lenders party to the Credit and Security Agreement (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4(a) to the company’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated August 29, 2017)
~~10.5(b)~~	ABL Intercreditor Agreement, dated as of August 29, 2017, among PNC Bank, National Association, as ABL Collateral Agent, and BNP Paribas, as Term Loan Collateral Agent, and acknowledged by Green Plains Trade Group LLC and the other ABL Grantors (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4(b) to the company’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated August 29, 2017)
~~10.5(c)~~	Guaranty, dated as of August 29, 2017, in favor of PNC Bank, National Association, as agent (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4(c) to the company’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated August 29, 2017)
~~10.6~~	~~Employment Agreement with John Neppl (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the company’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated September 5, 2017)~~

~~10.7~~	~~First Amendment to Term Loan Agreement, dated October 16, 2017, among Green Plains, Inc. and BNP Paribas, as administrative agent and collateral agent~~
~~10.8~~	~~Incremental Joinder Agreement, dated October 27, 2017, among Green Plains Operating Company LLC and Bank of America, as Administrative~~
~~31.1~~	Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) and Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
31.2	Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) and Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
32.1	Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
32.2	Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
101	The following information from Green Plains Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017,~~2020, formatted in Inline Extensible Business Reporting Language ~~(XBRL)~~(iXBRL): (i) Consolidated Balance Sheets, (ii) Consolidated Statements of Operations, (iii) Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income, (iv) Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, and (v) the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
104	The cover page from Green Plains Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2020, formatted in iXBRL.

‎

Table of Contents

51SIGNATURES

~~SIGNATURES~~

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.


	~~GREENPLAINSINC.~~
‎ ‎ ‎ ‎Date: August 5, 2020	GREEN PLAINS INC. (Registrant)


~~Date: November 2, 2017~~	By:	/s/ Todd A. Becker_
		Todd A. Becker
		‎President and Chief Executive Officer	(Principal Executive Officer)
‎ ‎ ‎Date: August 5, 2020		~~(Principal Executive Officer)~~



~~Date: November 2, 2017~~	By:	/s/ ~~John W. Neppl~~G. Patrich Simpkins Jr._
		~~John W. Neppl~~
		G. Patrich Simpkins Jr. ‎Chief Financial Officer
		(Principal Financial Officer)

5259

June 30, 2020

December 31, 2019

Weighted average remaining lease term

Weighted average discount rate


	Ethanol Production		Food and Food
	Production		Ingredients		Partnership		Total
Balance, December 31, 2016	$	30,279	$	142,819	$	10,598	$	183,696
Adjustment to preliminary Fleischmann's Vinegar Valuation		-		(817)		-		(817)
Balance, September 30, 2017	$	30,279	$	142,002	$	10,598	$	182,879


Gains (Losses) Due to Ineffectiveness	Three Months Ended September 30,				Nine Months Ended September 30,
of Cash Flow Hedges	2017		2016		2017		2016
Revenues	$	(48)	$	34	$	(229)	$	(5)
Cost of goods sold		(213)		96		(213)		(65)
Net increase (decrease) recognized in earnings before tax	$	(261)	$	130	$	(442)	$	(70)


Gains (Losses) from Fair Value	Three Months Ended September 30,				Nine Months Ended September 30,
Hedges of Inventory	2017		2016		2017		2016
Revenues (effect of change in inventory value)	$	61	$	(40)	$	1,451	$	1,379
Cost of goods sold (effect of change in inventory value)		(1,775)		(470)		(6,229)		7,712
Revenues (effect of fair value hedge)		(61)		40		(1,734)		(1,379)
Cost of goods sold (effect of fair value hedge)		3,085		918		8,530		(7,648)
Ineffectiveness recognized in earnings before tax	$	1,310	$	448	$	2,018	$	64


September 30, 2017
	Exchange Traded		Non-Exchange Traded
Derivative Instruments	Net Long & (Short) (1)		Long (2)	(Short) (2)	Unit of Measure	Commodity

Futures	(39,030)				Bushels	Corn, Soybeans and Wheat
Futures	67,775	(3)			Bushels	Corn
Futures	(13,175)	(4)			Bushels	Corn
Futures	9,828				Gallons	Ethanol
Futures	(285,852)	(3)			Gallons	Ethanol
Futures	1,745				MmBTU	Natural Gas
Futures	(13,753)	(4)			MmBTU	Natural Gas
Futures	(7,200)				Pounds	Livestock
Futures	(336,300)	(3)			Pounds	Livestock
Futures	40				Barrels	Crude Oil
Futures	(293)	(4)			Barrels	Crude Oil
Futures	(420)				Pounds	Soybean Oil
Futures	5,838	(3)			Gallons	Natural Gasoline
Options	(1,010)				Bushels	Corn, Soybeans and Wheat
Options	2,156				Gallons	Ethanol
Options	(3,456)				Pounds	Livestock
Options	(1,032)				Pounds	Soybean Oil
Options	29				Barrels	Crude Oil
Forwards			17,166	(247)	Bushels	Corn and Soybeans
Forwards			53,872	(336,067)	Gallons	Ethanol
Forwards			173	(375)	Tons	Distillers Grains
Forwards			14,367	(92,344)	Pounds	Corn Oil
Forwards			14,862	(1,036)	MmBTU	Natural Gasoline
Forwards			712	(412)	Barrels	Crude Oil


	Performance ‎Shares	Weighted- ‎Average Grant- ‎Date Fair Value		Weighted-Average ‎Remaining ‎Vesting Term ‎(in years)
Non-Vested at December 31, 2019	285,403	$	16.38
Granted	232,566		10.64
Non-Vested at June 30, 2020	517,969	$	13.80	2.2


	Shares	Weighted-Average Exercise Price		Weighted-Average Remaining Contractual Term (in years)	Aggregate Intrinsic Value (in thousands)

Outstanding at December 31, 2016	148,750	$	12.36	2.8	$	2,305
Granted	-		-	-		-
Exercised	(5,000)		10.00	-		78
Forfeited	-		-	-		-
Expired	-		-	-		-
Outstanding at September 30, 2017	143,750	$	12.44	2.1	$	1,109
Exercisable at September 30, 2017 (1)	143,750	$	12.44	2.1	$	1,109


	Shares	Weighted-Average ‎Exercise Price		Weighted-Average ‎ Remaining ‎ Contractual Term ‎(in years)	Aggregate Intrinsic Value ‎(in thousands)
Outstanding at December 31, 2019	10,000	$	16.95	0.2	$	-
Expired	(10,000)		16.95	-		-
Outstanding at June 30, 2020	-	$	-	-	$	-
Exercisable at June 30, 2020	-	$	-	-	$	-


	Non-Vested Shares and Deferred Stock Units	Weighted- Average Grant- Date Fair Value		Weighted-Average Remaining Vesting Term (in years)

Non-Vested at December 31, 2016	1,139,560	$	17.65
Granted	566,165		24.03
Forfeited	(42,430)		19.08
Vested	(542,764)		18.37
Non-Vested at September 30, 2017	1,120,531	$	20.47	2.0


	Three Months Ended September 30,				Nine Months Ended September 30,				Statements of Operations
	2017		2016		2017		2016		Classification
Gains on cash flow hedges:
Commodity derivatives	$	(5,242)	$	25,254	$	1,734	$	12,029	Revenues
Commodity derivatives		(1,861)		(28,548)		(1,679)		(15,904)	Cost of goods sold
Total		(7,103)		(3,294)		55		(3,875)	Income (loss) before income taxes
Income tax expense (benefit)		(2,650)		(1,144)		21		(1,369)	Income tax expense (benefit)
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)	$	(4,453)	$	(2,150)	$	34	$	(2,506)


Period	Total Number of Shares Withheld for Employee Awards	Average Price Paid per Share
July 1 - July 31	-	$	-
August 1 - August 30	1,565		17.07
September 1 - September 30	15,022		18.49
Total	16,587	$	18.36


Period	Number of Shares Repurchased	Average Price Paid per Share		Total Number of Shares Repurchased as Part of Repurchase Program	Approximate Dollar Value of Shares that may yet be Repurchased under the Program (in thousands)
July 1 - July 31	-	$	-	514,990	$	89,993
August 1 - August 30	285,849		17.10	800,839		85,097
September 1 - September 30	50,000		16.70	850,839		84,260
Total	335,849	$	17.04	850,839	$	84,260