UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 10-Q
xQUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the Quarterly Period Ended June 30, 20162017
OR
¨TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from _______________ to _______________
Commission File Number: 000-51719
linnlogoa19.jpg
LINN ENERGY, LLCINC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
65-117759181-5366183
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
600 Travis Suite 5100
Houston, Texas
(Address of principal executive offices)
77002
(Zip Code)
(281) 840-4000
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  x    No  ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).    Yes  x    No  ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer”filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “smaller reporting“emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filerx
¨Accelerated filer¨
Non-accelerated filer¨(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
Smaller reporting companyx
Emerging growth company¨





If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ¨    Non-accelerated filer  ¨    Smaller reporting company x
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    Yes  ¨    No  x
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed all documents and reports required to be filed by Sections 12, 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 subsequent to the distribution of securities under a plan confirmed by a court. Yes  x    No  ¨
As of July 31, 2016,2017, there were 355,154,941 units88,511,309 shares of Class A common stock, par value $0.001 per share, outstanding.
 



TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Page
   
 
   
  
 
 
 
 
 
   
  
   
 

i

Table of Contents

GLOSSARY OF TERMS
As commonly used in the oil and natural gas industry and as used in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, the following terms have the following meanings:
Bbl. One stock tank barrel or 42 United States gallons liquid volume.
Bcf. One billion cubic feet.
Bcfe. One billion cubic feet equivalent, determined using the ratio of six Mcf of natural gas to one Bbl of oil, condensate or natural gas liquids.
Btu. One British thermal unit, which is the heat required to raise the temperature of a one-pound mass of water from 58.5 degrees to 59.5 degrees Fahrenheit.
MBbls. One thousand barrels of oil or other liquid hydrocarbons.
MBbls/d. MBbls per day.
Mcf. One thousand cubic feet.
Mcfe. One thousand cubic feet equivalent, determined using the ratio of six Mcf of natural gas to one Bbl of oil, condensate or natural gas liquids.
MMBbls. One million barrels of oil or other liquid hydrocarbons.
MMBtu. One million British thermal units.
MMcf. One million cubic feet.
MMcf/d. MMcf per day.
MMcfe. One million cubic feet equivalent, determined using the ratio of six Mcf of natural gas to one Bbl of oil, condensate or natural gas liquids.
MMcfe/d. MMcfe per day.
MMMBtu. One billion British thermal units.
NGL. Natural gas liquids, which are the hydrocarbon liquids contained within natural gas.

ii

Table of Contents

PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1.Financial Statements
LINN ENERGY, LLC (DEBTOR-IN-POSSESSION)INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Unaudited)
June 30,
2016
 December 31,
2015
Successor  Predecessor
(in thousands,
except unit amounts)
June 30,
2017
  December 31,
2016
(in thousands, except share and unit amounts)    
ASSETS     
Current assets:       
Cash and cash equivalents$774,645
 $2,168
$16,903
  $694,857
Accounts receivable – trade, net202,597
 216,556
163,935
  198,064
Derivative instruments185
 1,220,230
23,959
  
Restricted cash98,616
  1,602
Other current assets108,894
 95,593
71,836
  105,310
Assets held for sale236,421
  
Current assets of discontinued operations235,643
  701
Total current assets1,086,321
 1,534,547
847,313
  1,000,534
       
Noncurrent assets:       
Oil and natural gas properties (successful efforts method)18,164,650
 18,121,155
1,444,110
  12,349,117
Less accumulated depletion and amortization(12,514,642) (11,097,492)(37,572)  (9,843,908)
5,650,008
 7,023,663
1,406,538
  2,505,209
       
Other property and equipment726,821
 708,711
441,483
  618,262
Less accumulated depreciation(222,192) (195,661)(12,739)  (217,724)
504,629
 513,050
428,744
  400,538
       
Derivative instruments
 566,401
12,759
  
Restricted cash204,828
 257,363
Deferred income taxes492,182
  
Other noncurrent assets31,388
 33,234
13,980
  13,984
Noncurrent assets of discontinued operations
  740,326
236,216
 856,998
518,921
  754,310
Total noncurrent assets6,390,853
 8,393,711
2,354,203
  3,660,057
Total assets$7,477,174
 $9,928,258
$3,201,516
  $4,660,591
       
LIABILITIES AND UNITHOLDERS’ DEFICIT   
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY (DEFICIT)    
Current liabilities:       
Accounts payable and accrued expenses$347,920
 $455,374
$268,605
  $295,081
Derivative instruments1,694
 2,241
486
  82,508
Current portion of long-term debt, net2,812,409
 3,714,693

  1,937,729
Other accrued liabilities47,692
 119,593
135,416
  25,979
Liabilities held for sale36,387
  
Current liabilities of discontinued operations28,218
  321
Total current liabilities3,209,715
 4,291,901
469,112
  2,341,618
       
Derivative instruments
 857

  11,349
Long-term debt, net
 5,292,676
Long-term debt183,430
  
Other noncurrent liabilities588,172
 611,725
264,025
  360,405
Noncurrent liabilities of discontinued operations
  39,202
Liabilities subject to compromise5,069,158
 

  4,305,005
       
Commitments and contingencies (Note 10)

 

   
Unitholders’ deficit:   
355,173,890 units and 355,017,428 units issued and outstanding at June 30, 2016, and December 31, 2015, respectively5,361,400
 5,343,116
Accumulated deficit(6,751,271) (5,612,017)
(1,389,871) (268,901)
Total liabilities and unitholders’ deficit$7,477,174
 $9,928,258

1

Table of Contents
LINN ENERGY, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS - Continued
(Unaudited)


 Successor  Predecessor
 June 30,
2017
  December 31,
2016
(in thousands, except share and unit amounts)    
Commitments and contingencies (Note 10)

  

Temporary equity:    
Redeemable noncontrolling interests28,132
  
Stockholders’/unitholders’ equity (deficit):    
Predecessor units issued and outstanding (no units issued or outstanding at June 30, 2017; 352,792,474 units issued and outstanding at December 31, 2016)
  5,386,885
Predecessor accumulated deficit
  (7,783,873)
Successor preferred stock ($0.001 par value, 30,000,000 shares authorized and no shares issued at June 30, 2017; no shares authorized or issued at December 31, 2016)
  
Successor Class A common stock ($0.001 par value, 270,000,000 shares authorized and 89,241,558 shares issued at June 30, 2017; no shares authorized or issued at December 31, 2016)89
  
Successor additional paid-in capital2,043,927
  
Successor retained earnings212,801
  
Total stockholders’/unitholders’ equity (deficit)2,256,817
  (2,396,988)
Total liabilities and equity (deficit)$3,201,516
  $4,660,591
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

2

Table of Contents
LINN ENERGY, LLC (DEBTOR-IN-POSSESSION)INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Unaudited)


Three Months Ended
June 30,
 
Six Months Ended
June 30,
Successor  Predecessor
2016 2015 2016 2015Three Months Ended June 30, 2017  Three Months Ended June 30, 2016
(in thousands, except per unit amounts)
(in thousands, except per share and per unit amounts)    
Revenues and other:           
Oil, natural gas and natural gas liquids sales$316,257
 $496,419
 $599,572
 $946,988
$243,167
  $195,847
Gains (losses) on oil and natural gas derivatives(182,768) (191,188) (72,807) 233,593
45,714
  (183,794)
Marketing revenues14,520
 10,733
 28,825
 44,477
12,547
  8,551
Other revenues7,386
 5,864
 14,572
 13,317
6,391
  23,641
155,395
 321,828
 570,162
 1,238,375
307,819
  44,245
Expenses:           
Lease operating expenses115,543
 140,652
 253,188
 313,673
71,057
  70,367
Transportation expenses52,037
 55,795
 106,960
 109,335
37,388
  41,092
Marketing expenses11,305
 9,159
 23,593
 38,000
6,976
  6,727
General and administrative expenses59,646
 98,650
 146,175
 177,618
34,458
  52,169
Exploration costs48
 564
 2,741
 960
811
  48
Depreciation, depletion and amortization143,171
 215,732
 307,229
 430,746
51,987
  86,358
Impairment of long-lived assets
 
 1,153,904
 532,617
Taxes, other than income taxes30,847
 58,034
 64,914
 112,079
17,871
  18,180
(Gains) losses on sale of assets and other, net2,942
 (17,996) 4,019
 (30,283)(306,969)  2,517
415,539
 560,590
 2,062,723
 1,684,745
(86,421)  277,458
Other income and (expenses):           
Interest expense, net of amounts capitalized(68,434) (146,100) (173,653) (289,201)(7,551)  (50,320)
Gain on extinguishment of debt
 9,151
 
 15,786
Other, net(1,302) (6,146) (1,168) (8,359)(1,163)  (1,226)
(69,736) (143,095) (174,821) (281,774)(8,714)  (51,546)
Reorganization items, net534,884
 
 534,884
 
(3,377)  485,798
Income (loss) before income taxes205,004
 (381,857) (1,132,498) (728,144)
Income from continuing operations before income taxes382,149
  201,039
Income tax expense (benefit)(3,488) (2,730) 6,756
 (9,857)158,770
  (3,652)
Net income (loss)$208,492
 $(379,127) $(1,139,254) $(718,287)
Income from continuing operations223,379
  204,691
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of income taxes(3,322)  3,801
Net income$220,057
  $208,492
           
Net income (loss) per unit:       
Basic$0.59
 $(1.12) $(3.23) $(2.15)
Diluted$0.59
 $(1.12) $(3.23) $(2.15)
Weighted average units outstanding:       
Basic352,789
 340,934
 352,511
 335,817
Diluted352,789
 340,934
 352,511
 335,817
Income from continuing operations per share/unit – Basic$2.49
  $0.58
Income from continuing operations per share/unit – Diluted$2.47
  $0.58
           
Distributions declared per unit$
 $0.313
 $
 $0.625
Income (loss) from discontinued operations per share/unit – Basic$(0.04)  $0.01
Income (loss) from discontinued operations per share/unit – Diluted$(0.04)  $0.01
    
Net income per share/unit – Basic$2.45
  $0.59
Net income per share/unit – Diluted$2.43
  $0.59
    
Weighted average shares/units outstanding – Basic89,849
  352,789
Weighted average shares/units outstanding – Diluted90,484
  352,789
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.


3

Table of Contents
LINN ENERGY, LLC (DEBTOR-IN-POSSESSION)INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTSTATEMENTS OF UNITHOLDERS’ DEFICITOPERATIONS - Continued
(Unaudited)


 Units Unitholders’ Capital Accumulated Deficit Total Unitholders’ Deficit
 (in thousands)
        
December 31, 2015355,017
 $5,343,116
 $(5,612,017) $(268,901)
Issuance of units157
 
 
 
Unit-based compensation expenses  18,553
 
 18,553
Excess tax benefit from unit-based compensation and other  (269) 
 (269)
Net loss  
 (1,139,254) (1,139,254)
June 30, 2016355,174
 $5,361,400
 $(6,751,271) $(1,389,871)
 Successor  Predecessor
 Four Months Ended June 30, 2017  Two Months Ended February 28, 2017 Six Months Ended June 30, 2016
(in thousands, except per share and per unit amounts)      
Revenues and other:      
Oil, natural gas and natural gas liquids sales$323,492
  $188,885
 $380,288
Gains (losses) on oil and natural gas derivatives33,755
  92,691
 (74,341)
Marketing revenues15,461
  6,636
 17,612
Other revenues8,419
  9,915
 51,947
 381,127
  298,127
 375,506
Expenses:      
Lease operating expenses95,687
  49,665
 153,613
Transportation expenses51,111
  25,972
 83,623
Marketing expenses9,515
  4,820
 14,560
General and administrative expenses44,869
  71,745
 135,889
Exploration costs866
  93
 2,741
Depreciation, depletion and amortization71,901
  47,155
 175,467
Impairment of long-lived assets
  
 123,316
Taxes, other than income taxes24,948
  14,877
 35,541
(Gains) losses on sale of assets and other, net(306,524)  672
 3,786
 (7,627)  214,999
 728,536
Other income and (expenses):      
Interest expense, net of amounts capitalized(11,751)  (16,725) (134,193)
Other, net(1,551)  (149) (1,158)
 (13,302)  (16,874) (135,351)
Reorganization items, net(5,942)  2,331,189
 485,798
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes369,510
  2,397,443
 (2,583)
Income tax expense (benefit)153,455
  (166) 6,594
Income (loss) from continuing operations216,055
  2,397,609
 (9,177)
Loss from discontinued operations, net of income taxes(3,254)  (548) (1,130,077)
Net income (loss)$212,801
  $2,397,061
 $(1,139,254)
       
Income (loss) from continuing operations per share/unit – Basic$2.41
  $6.80
 $(0.02)
Income (loss) from continuing operations per share/unit – Diluted$2.40
  $6.80
 $(0.02)
       
Loss from discontinued operations per share/unit – Basic$(0.04)  $(0.01) $(3.21)
Loss from discontinued operations per share/unit – Diluted$(0.04)  $(0.01) $(3.21)
       
Net income (loss) per share/unit – Basic$2.37
  $6.79
 $(3.23)
Net income (loss) per share/unit – Diluted$2.36
  $6.79
 $(3.23)
       
Weighted average shares/units outstanding – Basic89,849
  352,792
 352,511
Weighted average shares/units outstanding – Diluted90,065
  352,792
 352,511
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

4

Table of Contents

LINN ENERGY, LLC (DEBTOR-IN-POSSESSION)INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTSSTATEMENT OF CASH FLOWSEQUITY (PREDECESSOR)
(Unaudited)
 
Six Months Ended
June 30,
 2016 2015
 (in thousands)
Cash flow from operating activities:   
Net loss$(1,139,254) $(718,287)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by operating activities:   
Depreciation, depletion and amortization307,229
 430,746
Impairment of long-lived assets1,153,904
 532,617
Unit-based compensation expenses18,553
 33,711
Gain on extinguishment of debt
 (15,786)
Amortization and write-off of deferred financing fees9,829
 17,546
(Gains) losses on sale of assets and other, net3,287
 (25,894)
Deferred income taxes3,921
 (9,857)
Reorganization items, net(555,922) 
Derivatives activities:   
Total (gains) losses77,212
 (236,653)
Cash settlements508,097
 566,343
Cash settlements on canceled derivatives358,428
 
Changes in assets and liabilities:   
Decrease in accounts receivable – trade, net9,697
 169,978
(Increase) decrease in other assets(20,074) 3,523
Increase (decrease) in accounts payable and accrued expenses42,700
 (47,474)
Increase (decrease) in other liabilities23,594
 (27,031)
Net cash provided by operating activities801,201
 673,482
    
Cash flow from investing activities:   
Development of oil and natural gas properties(100,565) (416,347)
Purchases of other property and equipment(21,393) (29,287)
Decrease in restricted cash53,418
 
Proceeds from sale of properties and equipment and other(2,571) 58,714
Net cash used in investing activities(71,111) (386,920)
    
Cash flow from financing activities:   
Proceeds from sale of units
 233,427
Proceeds from borrowings978,500
 645,000
Repayments of debt(914,803) (850,051)
Distributions to unitholders
 (212,631)
Financing fees and offering costs(623) (8,649)
Excess tax benefit from unit-based compensation
 (9,467)
Other(20,687) (82,057)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities42,387
 (284,428)
    
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents772,477
 2,134
Cash and cash equivalents:   
Beginning2,168
 1,809
Ending$774,645
 $3,943
 Units Unitholders’ Capital Accumulated Deficit Total Unitholders’ Capital (Deficit)
 (in thousands)
        
December 31, 2016 (Predecessor)
352,792
 $5,386,885
 $(7,783,873) $(2,396,988)
Net income  
 2,397,061
 2,397,061
Other  (73) 
 (73)
February 28, 2017 (Predecessor)
352,792
 5,386,812
 (5,386,812) 
Cancellation of predecessor equity(352,792) (5,386,812) 5,386,812
 
February 28, 2017 (Predecessor)

 $
 $
 $
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF EQUITY (SUCCESSOR)
(Unaudited)
 Class A Common Stock Additional Paid-in Capital Retained Earnings Total Stockholders’ Equity
 Shares Amount   
 (in thousands)
          
Issuances of successor Class A common stock89,230
 $89
 $2,021,142
 $
 $2,021,231
Share-based compensation expenses  
 13,750
 
 13,750
February 28, 2017 (Successor)
89,230
 89
 2,034,892
 
 2,034,981
Net income  
 
 212,801
 212,801
Issuances of successor Class A common stock12
 
 
 
 
Repurchases of successor Class A common stock
 
 (230) 
 (230)
Share-based compensation expenses  
 9,454
 
 9,454
Other  
 (189) 
 (189)
June 30, 2017 (Successor)
89,242
 $89
 $2,043,927
 $212,801
 $2,256,817
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

5

Table of Contents
LINN ENERGY, LLC (DEBTOR-IN-POSSESSION)INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)


 Successor  Predecessor
 Four Months Ended June 30, 2017  Two Months Ended February 28, 2017 Six Months Ended June 30, 2016
(in thousands)      
Cash flow from operating activities:      
Net income (loss)$212,801
  $2,397,061
 $(1,139,254)
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:      
Loss from discontinued operations3,254
  548
 1,130,077
Depreciation, depletion and amortization71,901
  47,155
 175,467
Impairment of long-lived assets
  
 123,316
Deferred income taxes131,055
  (166) 3,850
Noncash (gains) losses on oil and natural gas derivatives(25,826)  (104,263) 931,251
Share-based compensation expenses19,599
  50,255
 18,553
Amortization and write-off of deferred financing fees82
  1,338
 9,227
(Gains) losses on sale of assets and other, net(293,811)  1,069
 3,929
Reorganization items, net
  (2,359,364) (498,954)
Changes in assets and liabilities:      
(Increase) decrease in accounts receivable – trade, net27,212
  (7,216) (12,046)
(Increase) decrease in other assets(1,245)  402
 (19,039)
Increase in restricted cash
  (80,164) 
Increase (decrease) in accounts payable and accrued expenses(49,984)  20,949
 47,062
Increase in other liabilities22,421
  2,801
 26,150
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities – continuing operations117,459
  (29,595) 799,589
Net cash provided by operating activities – discontinued operations13,966
  8,781
 1,612
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities131,425
  (20,814) 801,201
       
Cash flow from investing activities:      
Development of oil and natural gas properties(61,534)  (50,597) (80,909)
Purchases of other property and equipment(27,287)  (7,409) (13,655)
Proceeds from sale of properties and equipment and other641,219
  (166) (2,713)
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities – continuing operations552,398
  (58,172) (97,277)
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities – discontinued operations(1,645)  (584) 26,166
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities550,753
  (58,756) (71,111)
       

6

Table of Contents
LINN ENERGY, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS - Continued
(Unaudited)

 Successor  Predecessor
 Four Months Ended June 30, 2017  Two Months Ended February 28, 2017 Six Months Ended June 30, 2016
(in thousands)      
Cash flow from financing activities:      
Proceeds from rights offerings, net
  514,069
 
Proceeds from borrowings160,000
  
 978,500
Repayments of debt(876,570)  (1,038,986) (913,210)
Debt issuance costs paid(2,973)  
 (623)
Payment to holders of claims under the second lien notes
  (30,000) 
Other(87)  (6,015) (20,687)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities – continuing operations(719,630)  (560,932) 43,980
Net cash used in financing activities – discontinued operations
  
 (1,593)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities(719,630)  (560,932) 42,387
       
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents(37,452)  (640,502) 772,477
Cash and cash equivalents:      
Beginning54,355
  694,857
 2,168
Ending16,903
  54,355
 774,645
Less cash and cash equivalents of discontinued operations at end of period
  
 (15,008)
Ending – continuing operations$16,903
  $54,355
 $759,637
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

7

Table of Contents

LINN ENERGY, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
Note 1 – Basis of Presentation
Nature of Business
When referring to Linn Energy, LLCInc. (formerly known as Linn Energy, LLC) (“LINNSuccessor,” “LINN Energy” or the “Company”), the intent is to refer to LINN Energy, a newly formed Delaware corporation, and its consolidated subsidiaries as a whole or on an individual basis, depending on the context in which the statements are made. Linn Energy, Inc. is a successor issuer of Linn Energy, LLC pursuant to Rule 15d‑5 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). When referring to the “Predecessor” in reference to the period prior to the emergence from bankruptcy, the intent is to refer to Linn Energy, LLC, the predecessor that will be dissolved following the effective date of the Plan (as defined below) and resolution of all outstanding claims, and its consolidated subsidiaries as a whole or on an individual basis, depending on the context in which the statements are made.
The reference to “Berry” herein refers to Berry Petroleum Company, LLC, which was an indirect 100% wholly owned subsidiary of the Predecessor through February 28, 2017. Berry was deconsolidated effective December 3, 2016 (see Note 4). The reference to “LinnCo” herein refers to LinnCo, LLC, an affiliate of the Predecessor.
Nature of Business
LINN Energy is an independent oil and natural gas company.company that was formed in February 2017, in connection with the reorganization of the Predecessor. The Predecessor was publicly traded from January 2006 to February 2017. As discussed further in Note 2, on May 11, 2016 (the “Petition Date”), Linn Energy, LLC, certain of its direct and indirect subsidiaries, and LinnCo (collectively, the “LINN Debtors”) and Berry (collectively with the LINN Energy’s mission is to acquire, developDebtors, the “Debtors”), filed voluntary petitions (“Bankruptcy Petitions”) for relief under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code (“Bankruptcy Code”) in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Texas (“Bankruptcy Court”). The Debtors’ Chapter 11 cases were administered jointly under the caption In re Linn Energy, LLC, et al., Case No. 16-60040. During the pendency of the Chapter 11 proceedings, the Debtors operated their businesses as “debtors-in-possession” under the jurisdiction of the Bankruptcy Court and maximize cash flowin accordance with the applicable provisions of the Bankruptcy Code. The Company emerged from a growing portfolio of long-life oil and natural gas assets. bankruptcy effective February 28, 2017.
The Company’s properties are currently located in eightseven operating regions in the United States (“U.S.”), in the Rockies, the Hugoton Basin, California, the Mid-Continent, east Texas and north Louisiana (“TexLa”), the Permian Basin, Michigan/Illinois and south Texas. In July 2017, the Company divested all of its properties located in California.
Principles of Consolidation and Reporting
The information reported herein reflects all normal recurring adjustments that are, in the opinion of management, necessary for the fair presentation of the results for the interim periods. Certain information and note disclosures normally included in annual financial statements prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) have been condensed or omitted under Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) rules and regulations; as such, this report should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and notes in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015.2016. The results reported in these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements should not necessarily be taken as indicative of results that may be expected for the entire year.
The condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly owned subsidiaries. All significant intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated upon consolidation. Investments in noncontrolled entities over which the Company exercises significant influence are accounted for under the equity method.
The reference Redeemable noncontrolling interests on the condensed consolidated balance sheet as of June 30, 2017, relate to “Berry” herein refers to Berry Petroleum Company,the noncontrolling Class B unitholders of the Company’s subsidiary, Linn Energy Holdco LLC which is an indirect 100% wholly owned subsidiary of LINN Energy. The reference to “LinnCo” herein refers to LinnCo, LLC, which is an affiliate of LINN Energy.(“Holdco”). See Note 12 and Note 17 for additional information.
The condensed consolidated financial statements for previous periods include certain reclassifications that were made to conform to current presentation. In addition, the Company has classified the assets and liabilities of its California properties, as

8

Table of Contents
LINN ENERGY, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – Continued
(Unaudited)

well as the results of operations and cash flows of its California properties and Berry, as discontinued operations on its condensed consolidated financial statements. Such reclassifications have no impact on previously reported net income (loss), stockholders’/unitholders’ deficitequity (deficit) or cash flows. See Note 4 for additional information.
Bankruptcy Accounting
As discussed further in Note 2, on May 11, 2016 (the “Petition Date”), the Company and certain of its direct and indirect subsidiaries (collectively with the Company, the “LINN Debtors”), LinnCo and Berry (collectively with the LINN Debtors and LinnCo, the “Debtors”), filed voluntary petitions (“Bankruptcy Petitions”) for relief under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code (“Bankruptcy Code”) in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Texas (“Bankruptcy Court”). During the pendency of the Chapter 11 proceedings, the Debtors will operate their businesses as “debtors-in-possession” under the jurisdiction of the Bankruptcy Court and in accordance with the applicable provisions of the Bankruptcy Code.
The condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared as if the Company iswill continue as a going concern and reflect the application of Accounting Standards Codification 852 “Reorganizations” (“ASC 852”). ASC 852 requires that the financial statements, for periods subsequent to the Chapter 11 filing, distinguish transactions and events that are directly associated with the reorganization from the ongoing operations of the business. Accordingly, certain expenses, gains and losses that are realized or incurred in the bankruptcy proceedings are recorded in “reorganization items, net” on the Company’s condensed consolidated statements of operations. In addition, prepetition unsecured and under-secured obligations that may be impacted by the bankruptcy reorganization process have been classified as “liabilities subject to compromise” on the Company’s condensed consolidated balance sheet at June 30,December 31, 2016. These liabilities are reported at the amounts expected to be allowed as claims by the Bankruptcy Court, although they may be settled for less.
The accompanying condensed consolidatedUpon emergence from bankruptcy on February 28, 2017, the Company adopted fresh start accounting which resulted in the Company becoming a new entity for financial statements do not purport to reflect or provide for the consequencesreporting purposes. As a result of the Chapter 11 proceedings. In particular,application of fresh start accounting and the effects of the implementation of the plan of reorganization, the condensed consolidated financial statements doon or after February 28, 2017, are not purport to show: (i)comparable with the realizable

5

Table of Contents
LINN ENERGY, LLC (DEBTOR-IN-POSSESSION)
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – Continued
(Unaudited)

value of assets on a liquidation basis or their availability to satisfy liabilities; (ii) the amount of prepetition liabilities that may be allowed for claims or contingencies, or the status and priority thereof; (iii) the effect on unitholders’ deficit accounts of any changes that may be made to the Company’s capitalization; or (iv) the effect on operations of any changes that may be made to the Company’s business. While operating as debtor-in-possession under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code, the Company may sell or otherwise dispose of or liquidate assets or settle liabilities in amounts other than those reflected on its condensed consolidated financial statements subjectprior to the approval of the Bankruptcy Court or otherwise as permitted in the ordinary course of business. Further, a plan of reorganization could materially change the amounts and classifications on the Company’s historical condensed consolidated financial statements.that date. See Note 3 for additional information.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management of the Company to make estimates and assumptions about future events. These estimates and the underlying assumptions affect the amount of assets and liabilities reported, disclosures about contingent assets and liabilities, and reported amounts of revenues and expenses. The estimates that are particularly significant to the financial statements include estimates of the Company’s reserves of oil, natural gas and natural gas liquids (“NGL”), future cash flows from oil and natural gas properties, depreciation, depletion and amortization, asset retirement obligations, certain revenues and operating expenses, fair values of commodity derivatives and fair values of assets acquired and liabilities assumed. In addition, as part of fresh start accounting, the Company made estimates and assumptions related to its reorganization value, liabilities subject to compromise, the fair value of assets and liabilities recorded as a result of the adoption of fresh start accounting and income taxes.
As fair value is a market-based measurement, it is determined based on the assumptions that market participants would use. These estimates and assumptions are based on management’s best estimates and judgment. Management evaluates its estimates and assumptions on an ongoing basis using historical experience and other factors, including the current economic environment, which management believes to be reasonable under the circumstances. Such estimates and assumptions are adjusted when facts and circumstances dictate. As future events and their effects cannot be determined with precision, actual results could differ from these estimates. Any changes in estimates resulting from continuing changes in the economic environment will be reflected in the financial statements in future periods.
Recently Issued Accounting Standards
In MarchNovember 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued an Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) that is intended to address diversity in the classification and presentation of changes in restricted cash on the statement of cash flows. This ASU will be applied retrospectively as of the date of adoption and is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, and interim periods within those fiscal years (early adoption permitted). The Company is currently evaluating the impact of the adoption of this ASU on its financial statements and related disclosures. The adoption of this ASU is expected to result in the inclusion of restricted cash in the beginning and ending balances of cash on the statements of cash flows and disclosure reconciling cash and cash equivalents presented on the balance sheets to cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash on the statements of cash flows.

9

Table of Contents
LINN ENERGY, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – Continued
(Unaudited)

In March 2016, the FASB issued an ASU that is intended to simplify several aspects of the accounting for share-based payment transactions, including the income tax consequences, classification of awards as either equity or liabilities and classification on the statement of cash flows. Components ofThe Company adopted this ASU will be applied either prospectively, retrospectively or under a modified retrospective basis (as applicable for the respective provision) as of the date of adoption and is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016, and interim periods within those annual periods.on January 1, 2017. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of the adoption of this ASU had no impact on its consolidatedthe Company’s historical financial statements andor related disclosures. Upon adoption and subsequently this ASU will result in excess tax benefits, which were previously recorded in equity on the balance sheets and classified as financing activities on the statements of cash flows, being recorded in the statements of operations and classified as operating activities on the statements of cash flows. Additionally, the Company elected to begin accounting for forfeitures as they occur.
In February 2016, the FASB issued an ASU that is intended to increase transparency and comparability among organizations by recognizing lease assets and lease liabilities on the balance sheet. This ASU will be applied retrospectively as of the date of adoption and is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, and interim periods within those years (early adoption permitted). The Company is currently evaluating the impact of the adoption of this ASU on its consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.
In November 2015, the FASB issued an ASU that is intended to simplify the presentation of deferred taxes by requiring that all deferred taxes be classified as noncurrent, presented as a single noncurrent amount for each tax-paying component of an entity. The ASU is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016; however, the Company early adopted it on January 1, 2016, on a retrospective basis. The adoption of this ASU resulted in the reclassification of previously-classified net current deferred taxes of approximately $22 million from “other current assets,” as well as previously-classified net noncurrent deferred tax liabilities of approximately $11 million from “other noncurrent liabilities,” to “other noncurrent assets” resulting in net noncurrent deferred taxes of approximately $11 million on the Company’s consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 2015. There was no impact to the consolidated statements of operations.
In April 2015, the FASB issued an ASU that is intended to simplify the presentation of debt issuance costs by requiring that debt issuance costs related to a recognized debt liability be presented on the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the

6

Table of Contents
LINN ENERGY, LLC (DEBTOR-IN-POSSESSION)
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – Continued
(Unaudited)

carrying amount of that debt liability, consistent with debt discounts. The Company adopted this ASU on January 1, 2016, on a retrospective basis. The adoption of this ASU resulted in the reclassification of approximately $37 million of unamortized deferred financing fees (which excludes deferred financing fees associated with the Company’s Credit Facilities, as defined in Note 6, which were not reclassified) from an asset to a direct deduction from the carrying amount of the associated debt liability on the consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 2015. There was no impact to the consolidated statements of operations.
In August 2014, the FASB issued an ASU that provides guidance about management’s responsibility to evaluate whether there is substantial doubt about an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern and to provide related footnote disclosures. This ASU is effective for the annual period ending after December 15, 2016, and for annual periods and interim periods thereafter (early adoption permitted). The Company does not expectexpects the adoption of this ASU to have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements orbalance sheets resulting from an increase in both assets and liabilities related disclosures.to the Company’s leasing activities.
In May 2014, the FASB issued an ASU that is intended to improve and converge the financial reporting requirements for revenue from contracts with customers. This ASU will be applied either retrospectively or as a cumulative-effect adjustment as of the date of adoption and is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, and interim periods within those years (early adoption permitted for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016, including interim periods within that year). The Company does not plan to early adopt this ASU. The Company is currently evaluating the impact if any, of the adoption of this ASU on its consolidated financial statements and related disclosures. The Company expects to use the cumulative-effect transition method, has completed an initial review of its contracts and is developing accounting policies to address the provisions of the ASU, but has not finalized any estimates of the potential impacts.
Note 2 – Emergence From Voluntary Reorganization Under Chapter 11 Proceedings, Ability to Continue as a Going Concern and Covenant Violations
Chapter 11 Proceedings
On the Petition Date, the Debtors filed Bankruptcy Petitions for relief under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code in the Bankruptcy Court. The Debtors’ Chapter 11 cases are beingwere administered jointly under the caption In re Linn Energy, LLC.,LLC, et al., Case No. 16‑60040.
On December 3, 2016, the LINN Debtors filed the Amended Joint Chapter 11 Plan of Reorganization of Linn Energy, LLC and Its Debtor Affiliates Other Than Linn Acquisition Company, LLC (“LAC”) and Berry Petroleum Company, LLC (the “Plan”). The LINN Debtors are operating their businesses as “debtors-in-possession” undersubsequently filed amended versions of the jurisdictionPlan with the Bankruptcy Court.
On December 13, 2016, LAC and Berry filed the Amended Joint Chapter 11 Plan of Reorganization of Linn Acquisition Company, LLC and Berry Petroleum Company, LLC (the “Berry Plan” and together with the Plan, the “Plans”). LAC and Berry subsequently filed amended versions of the Berry Plan with the Bankruptcy Court.
On January 27, 2017, the Bankruptcy Court entered an order approving and confirming the Plans (the “Confirmation Order”). On February 28, 2017 (the “Effective Date”), the Debtors satisfied the conditions to effectiveness of the respective Plans, the Plans became effective in accordance with their respective terms and LINN Energy and Berry emerged from bankruptcy as stand-alone, unaffiliated entities.
Plan of Reorganization
In accordance with the applicable provisionsPlan, on the Effective Date:
The Predecessor transferred all of its assets, including equity interests in its subsidiaries, other than LAC and Berry, to Linn Energy Holdco II LLC (“Holdco II”), a newly formed subsidiary of the Bankruptcy Code. The Bankruptcy Court has granted certain relief requested byPredecessor and the Debtors, allowingborrower under the Company to use its cash to fundCredit Agreement (as amended, the Chapter 11 proceedings, pursuant to an agreement“Successor Credit Facility”) entered into in connection with the first lien lenders, and giving the Company the authority to, among other things, continue to pay employee wages and benefits without interruption, to utilize its current cash management system and to make royalty payments. During the pendencyreorganization, in exchange for 100% of the Chapter 11 proceedings, all transactions outsideequity of Holdco II and the ordinary courseissuance of interests in the Successor Credit Facility to certain of the Company’s business require prior approvalPredecessor’s creditors in partial satisfaction of their claims (the “Contribution”). Immediately following the Contribution, the Predecessor transferred 100% of the Bankruptcy Court. For goods and services provided following the Petition Date, the Company intends to pay vendorsequity interests in full under normal terms.
Restructuring Support Agreement
PriorHoldco II to the Petition Date, on May 10, 2016, the Debtors entered into a restructuring support agreement (“Restructuring Support Agreement”) with certain holders (“Consenting Creditors”) collectively holding or controlling at least 66.67% by aggregate outstanding principal amounts under (i) the Company’s Sixth AmendedSuccessor in exchange for approximately $530 million in cash and Restated Credit Agreement (“LINN Credit Facility”) and (ii) Berry’s Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement (“Berry Credit Facility”).
The Restructuring Support Agreement sets forth, subject to certain conditions, the commitmentan amount of the Consenting Creditors to support a comprehensive restructuring of the Debtors’ long-term debt (“Restructuring Transactions”). The Restructuring Transactions will be effectuated through one or more plans of reorganization (“Plan”) to be filedequity securities in the Chapter 11 proceedings.
The Restructuring Support Agreement provides that the Consenting Creditors will support the useSuccessor not to exceed 49.90% of the LINN Debtors’ and Berry’s cash collateral under specified terms and conditions, including adequate protection terms. The Restructuring Support Agreement obligates the Debtors and the Consenting Creditors to, among other things, support and not interfere with consummation of the Restructuring Transactions and, as to the Consenting Creditors, vote their claims in favor of the Plan. The Restructuring Support Agreement may be terminated upon the occurrence of certain events, including the failure to meet specified milestones relating to, among other requirements, the filing, confirmation and consummation of the Plan, and in the

710

Table of Contents
LINN ENERGY, LLC (DEBTOR-IN-POSSESSION)INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – Continued
(Unaudited)

eventoutstanding equity interests of breachesthe Successor, which the Predecessor distributed to certain of its creditors in satisfaction of their claims. Contemporaneously with the reorganization transactions and pursuant to the Plan, (i) LAC assigned all of its rights, title and interest in the membership interests of Berry to Berry Petroleum Corporation, (ii) all of the equity interests in LAC and the Predecessor were canceled and (iii) LAC and the Predecessor commenced liquidation, which is expected to be completed following the resolution of the respective companies’ outstanding claims.
The holders of claims under the Predecessor’s Sixth Amended and Restated Credit Agreement (“Predecessor Credit Facility”) received a full recovery, consisting of a cash paydown and their pro rata share of the $1.7 billion Successor Credit Facility. As a result, all outstanding obligations under the Predecessor Credit Facility were canceled.
Holdco II, as borrower, entered into the Successor Credit Facility with the holders of claims under the Predecessor Credit Facility, as lenders, and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as administrative agent, providing for a new reserve-based revolving loan with up to $1.4 billion in borrowing commitments and a new term loan in an original principal amount of $300 million. For additional information about the Successor Credit Facility, see Note 6.
The holders of the Company’s 12.00% senior secured second lien notes due December 2020 (the “Second Lien Notes”) received their pro rata share of (i) 17,678,889 shares of Class A common stock; (ii) certain rights to purchase shares of Class A common stock in the rights offerings, as described below; and (iii) $30 million in cash. The holders of the Company’s 6.50% senior notes due May 2019, 6.25% senior notes due November 2019, 8.625% senior notes due 2020, 7.75% senior notes due February 2021 and 6.50% senior notes due September 2021 (collectively, the “Unsecured Notes”) received their pro rata share of (i) 26,724,396 shares of Class A common stock; and (ii) certain rights to purchase shares of Class A common stock in the rights offerings, as described below. As a result, all outstanding obligations under the Second Lien Notes and the Unsecured Notes and the indentures governing such obligations were canceled.
The holders of general unsecured claims (other than claims relating to the Second Lien Notes and the Unsecured Notes) against the LINN Debtors (the “LINN Unsecured Claims”) received their pro rata share of cash from two cash distribution pools totaling $40 million, as divided between a $2.3 million cash distribution pool for the payment in full of allowed LINN Unsecured Claims in an amount equal to $2,500 or less (and larger claims for which the holders irrevocably agreed to reduce such claims to $2,500), and a $37.7 million cash distribution pool for pro rata distributions to all remaining allowed general LINN Unsecured Claims. As a result, all outstanding LINN Unsecured Claims were fully satisfied, settled, released and discharged as of the Effective Date.
All units of the Predecessor that were issued and outstanding immediately prior to the Effective Date were extinguished without recovery. On the Effective Date, the Successor issued in the aggregate 89,229,892 shares of Class A common stock. No cash was raised from the issuance of the Class A common stock on account of claims held by the Predecessor’s creditors.
The Successor entered into a registration rights agreement with certain parties, of certain provisionspursuant to which the Company agreed to, among other things, file a registration statement with the SEC within 60 days of the Restructuring Support Agreement. The Restructuring Support Agreement is subject to termination ifEffective Date covering the effective dateoffer and resale of “Registrable Securities” (as defined therein).
By operation of the Plan has not occurred within 250 daysand the Confirmation Order, the terms of the PetitionPredecessor’s board of directors expired as of the Effective Date. There can be no assurance thatThe Successor formed a new board of directors, consisting of the Restructuring Transactions will be consummated.Chief Executive Officer of the Predecessor, one director selected by the Successor and five directors selected by a six-person selection committee.
Magnitude of Potential ClaimsRights Offerings
On July 11,October 25, 2016, the DebtorsCompany entered into a backstop commitment agreement (“Backstop Commitment Agreement”) with the parties thereto (collectively, the “Backstop Parties”). In accordance with the Plan, the Backstop Commitment Agreement and the rights offerings procedures filed within the Chapter 11 cases and approved by the Bankruptcy Court, schedules and statements setting forth, among other things, the assets and liabilitiesLINN Debtors offered eligible creditors the right to purchase Class A common stock upon emergence from the Chapter 11 cases for an aggregate purchase price of $530 million.

11

Table of Contents
LINN ENERGY, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – Continued
(Unaudited)

Under the Backstop Commitment Agreement, certain Backstop Parties agreed to purchase their pro rata share of the Debtors, subjectshares that were not duly subscribed to pursuant to the assumptions filed in connection therewith. The schedules and statements may be subject to further amendment or modification after filing. Holders of prepetition claims will be required to file proofs of claims byofferings at the applicable deadline for filing certain proofs of claimsdiscounted per share price set forth in the Debtors’ Chapter 11 cases. The court has not yet confirmedBackstop Commitment Agreement by parties other than Backstop Parties (the “Backstop Commitment”). Pursuant to the claims deadlines. Differences between amounts scheduled byBackstop Commitment Agreement, the LINN Debtors agreed to pay the Backstop Parties on the Effective Date a commitment premium equal to 4.0% of the $530 million committed amount (the “Backstop Commitment Premium”), of which 3.0% was paid in cash and claims by creditors will be investigated1.0% was paid in the form of Class A common stock at the discounted per share price set forth in the Backstop Commitment Agreement.
On the Effective Date, all conditions to the rights offerings and resolved in connection with the claims resolution process.Backstop Commitment Agreement were met, and the LINN Debtors completed the rights offerings and the related issuances of Class A common stock.
Liabilities Subject to Compromise
The Company’sPredecessor’s condensed consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2016, includes amounts classified as “liabilities subject to compromise,” which represent prepetition liabilities that have beenwere allowed, or that the Company anticipates willestimated would be allowed, as claims in its Chapter 11 cases. The amounts represent the Company’s current estimate of known or potential obligations to be resolved in connection with the Chapter 11 proceedings. The differences between the liabilities the Company has estimated and the claims filed, or to be filed, will be investigated and resolved in connection with the claims resolution process. The Company will continue to evaluate these liabilities throughout the Chapter 11 process and adjust amounts as necessary. Such adjustments may be material.
The following table summarizes the components of liabilities subject to compromise included on the condensed consolidated balance sheet:
Predecessor
June 30, 2016December 31, 2016
(in thousands)(in thousands)
  
Accounts payable and accrued expenses$52,807
$137,692
Accrued interest payable159,422
144,184
Debt4,856,929
4,023,129
Liabilities subject to compromise$5,069,158
$4,305,005
Reorganization Items, Net
The Company has incurred and is expected to continue to incur significant costs and recognized significant gains associated with the reorganization. These costs, which are expensed as incurred, are expected to significantly affect the Company’s results of operations. Reorganization items represent costs and income directly associated with the Chapter 11 proceedings since the Petition Date, and also include adjustments to reflect the carrying value of certain liabilities subject to compromise at their estimated allowed claim amounts, as such adjustments arewere determined. The following tables summarize the components of reorganization items included on the condensed consolidated statements of operations:
 Successor  Predecessor
 Three Months Ended June 30, 2017  Three Months Ended June 30, 2016
(in thousands)    
Legal and other professional advisory fees$(3,446)  $(13,451)
Unamortized deferred financing fees, discounts and premiums
  (52,045)
Gain related to interest payable on Predecessor’s Second Lien Notes
  551,000
Other69
  294
Reorganization items, net$(3,377)  $485,798



812

Table of Contents
LINN ENERGY, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – Continued
(Unaudited)

 Successor  Predecessor
 Four Months Ended June 30, 2017  Two Months Ended February 28, 2017 Six Months Ended June 30, 2016
(in thousands)      
Gain on settlement of liabilities subject to compromise$
  $3,724,750
 $
Recognition of an additional claim for the Predecessor’s Second Lien Notes settlement
  (1,000,000) 
Fresh start valuation adjustments
  (591,525) 
Income tax benefit related to implementation of the Plan
  264,889
 
Legal and other professional advisory fees(6,016)  (46,961) (13,451)
Unamortized deferred financing fees, discounts and premiums
  
 (52,045)
Gain related to interest payable on Predecessor’s Second Lien Notes
  
 551,000
Terminated contracts
  (6,915) 
Other74
  (13,049) 294
Reorganization items, net$(5,942)  $2,331,189
 $485,798

Note 3 – Fresh Start Accounting
Upon the Company’s emergence from Chapter 11 bankruptcy, it adopted fresh start accounting in accordance with the provisions of ASC 852 which resulted in the Company becoming a new entity for financial reporting purposes. In accordance with ASC 852, the Company was required to adopt fresh start accounting upon its emergence from Chapter 11 because (i) the holders of existing voting ownership interests of the Predecessor received less than 50% of the voting shares of the Successor and (ii) the reorganization value of the Company’s assets immediately prior to confirmation of the Plan was less than the total of all post-petition liabilities and allowed claims.
Upon adoption of fresh start accounting, the reorganization value derived from the enterprise value as disclosed in the Plan was allocated to the Company’s assets and liabilities based on their fair values (except for deferred income taxes) in accordance with ASC 805 “Business Combinations” (“ASC 805”). The amount of deferred income taxes recorded was determined in accordance with ASC 740 “Income Taxes” (“ASC 740”). The Effective Date fair values of the Company’s assets and liabilities differed materially from their recorded values as reflected on the historical balance sheet. The effects of the Plan and the application of fresh start accounting were reflected on the condensed consolidated balance sheet as of February 28, 2017, and the related adjustments thereto were recorded on the condensed consolidated statement of operations for the two months ended February 28, 2017.
As a result of the adoption of fresh start accounting and the effects of the implementation of the Plan, the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements subsequent to February 28, 2017, are not comparable to its condensed consolidated financial statements prior to February 28, 2017. References to “Successor” relate to the financial position and results of operations of the reorganized Company as of and subsequent to February 28, 2017. References to “Predecessor” relate to the financial position of the Company prior to, and results of operations through and including, February 28, 2017.
The Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements and related footnotes are presented with a black line division, which delineates the lack of comparability between amounts presented after February 28, 2017, and amounts presented on or prior to February 28, 2017. The Company’s financial results for future periods following the application of fresh start accounting will be different from historical trends and the differences may be material.

13

Table of Contents
LINN ENERGY, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – Continued
(Unaudited)

Reorganization Value
Under ASC 852, the Successor determined a value to be assigned to the equity of the emerging entity as of the date of adoption of fresh start accounting. The Plan confirmed by the Bankruptcy Court estimated an enterprise value of $2.35 billion. The Plan enterprise value was prepared using an asset based methodology, as discussed further below. The enterprise value was then adjusted to determine the equity value of the Successor of approximately $2.03 billion. Adjustments to determine the equity value are presented below (in thousands):
Plan confirmed enterprise value$2,350,000
Fair value of debt(900,000)
Fair value of subsequently determined tax attributes621,486
Fair value of vested Class B units(36,505)
Value of Successor’s stockholders’ equity$2,034,981
The subsequently determined tax attributes were primarily the result of the conversion from a limited liability company to a C corporation and differences in the accounting basis and tax basis of the Company’s oil and natural gas properties as of the Effective Date. The Class B units are incentive interest awards that were granted on the Effective Date by Holdco to certain members of its management (see Note 12), and the associated fair value was recorded as a liability of approximately $7 million in “other accrued liabilities” and temporary equity of approximately $29 million in “redeemable noncontrolling interests” on the condensed consolidated balance sheet at February 28, 2017.
The Company's principal assets are its oil and natural gas properties. The fair values of oil and natural gas properties were estimated using valuation techniques consistent with the income approach, converting future cash flows to a single discounted amount. Significant inputs used to determine the fair values of properties include estimates of: (i) reserves; (ii) future operating and development costs; (iii) future commodity prices; and (iv) a market-based weighted average cost of capital rate. These inputs require significant judgments and estimates by the Company’s management at the time of the valuation and are the most sensitive and subject to change. The underlying commodity prices embedded in the Company’s estimated cash flows are the product of a process that begins with New York Mercantile Exchange (“NYMEX”) forward curve pricing, adjusted for estimated location and quality differentials, as well as other factors that Company management believes will impact realizable prices.
See below under “Fresh Start Adjustments” for additional information regarding assumptions used in the valuation of the Company's various other significant assets and liabilities.
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet
The adjustments included in the following fresh start condensed consolidated balance sheet reflect the effects of the transactions contemplated by the Plan and executed by the Company on the Effective Date (reflected in the column “Reorganization Adjustments”) as well as fair value and other required accounting adjustments resulting from the adoption of fresh start accounting (reflected in the column “Fresh Start Adjustments”). The explanatory notes provide additional information with regard to the adjustments recorded, the methods used to determine the fair values and significant assumptions.


14

Table of Contents
LINN ENERGY, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – Continued
(Unaudited)

 As of February 28, 2017
 Predecessor 
Reorganization Adjustments (1)
  Fresh Start Adjustments  Successor
 (in thousands)
ASSETS         
Current assets:         
Cash and cash equivalents$734,166
 $(679,811)
(2) 
 $
  $54,355
Accounts receivable – trade, net212,099
 
  (7,808)
(16) 
 204,291
Derivative instruments15,391
 
  
  15,391
Restricted cash1,602
 80,164
(3) 
 
  81,766
Other current assets106,426
 (15,983)
(4) 
 1,780
(17) 
 92,223
Total current assets1,069,684
 (615,630)  (6,028)  448,026
          
Noncurrent assets:         
Oil and natural gas properties (successful efforts method)13,269,035
 
  (11,082,258)
(18) 
 2,186,777
Less accumulated depletion and amortization(10,044,240) 
  10,044,240
(18) 
 
 3,224,795
 
  (1,038,018)  2,186,777
          
Other property and equipment641,586
 
  (197,653)
(19) 
 443,933
Less accumulated depreciation(230,952) 
  230,952
(19) 
 
 410,634
 
  33,299
  443,933
          
Derivative instruments4,492
 
  
  4,492
Deferred income taxes
 264,889
(5) 
 356,597
(5) 
 621,486
Other noncurrent assets15,003
 151
(6) 
 8,139
(20) 
 23,293
 19,495
 265,040
  364,736
  649,271
Total noncurrent assets3,654,924
 265,040
  (639,983)  3,279,981
Total assets$4,724,608
 $(350,590)  $(646,011)  $3,728,007
          
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY (DEFICIT)        
Current liabilities:         
Accounts payable and accrued expenses$324,585
 $41,266
(7) 
 $(2,351)
(21) 
 $363,500
Derivative instruments7,361
 
  
  7,361
Current portion of long-term debt, net1,937,822
 (1,912,822)
(8) 
 
  25,000
Other accrued liabilities41,251
 (1,026)
(9) 
 1,104
(22) 
 41,329
Total current liabilities2,311,019
 (1,872,582)  (1,247)  437,190
          
Derivative instruments2,116
 
  
  2,116
Long-term debt
 875,000
(10) 
 
  875,000
Other noncurrent liabilities402,776
 (167)
(11) 
 (53,239)
(23) 
 349,370
Liabilities subject to compromise4,301,912
 (4,301,912)
(12) 
 
  
          
Temporary equity:         
Redeemable noncontrolling interests
 29,350
(13) 
 
  29,350

15

Table of Contents
LINN ENERGY, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – Continued
(Unaudited)

 As of February 28, 2017
 Predecessor 
Reorganization Adjustments (1)
  Fresh Start Adjustments  Successor
Stockholders’/unitholders’ equity (deficit):         
Predecessor units issued and outstanding5,386,812
 (5,386,812)
(14) 
 
  
Predecessor accumulated deficit(7,680,027) 2,884,740
(15) 
 4,795,287
(24) 
 
Successor Class A common stock
 89
(14) 
 
  89
Successor additional paid-in capital
 7,421,704
(14) 
 (5,386,812)
(24) 
 2,034,892
Successor retained earnings
 
  
  
Total stockholders’/unitholders’ equity (deficit)(2,293,215) 4,919,721
  (591,525)  2,034,981
Total liabilities and equity (deficit)$4,724,608
 $(350,590)  $(646,011)  $3,728,007
Reorganization Adjustments:
1)Represent amounts recorded as of the Effective Date for the implementation of the Plan, including, among other items, settlement of the Predecessor’s liabilities subject to compromise, repayment of certain of the Predecessor’s debt, cancellation of the Predecessor’s equity, issuances of the Successor’s Class A common stock, proceeds received from the Successor’s rights offerings and issuance of the Successor’s debt.
2)Changes in cash and cash equivalents included the following:
(in thousands) 
Borrowings under the Successor’s revolving loan$600,000
Borrowings under the Successor’s term loan300,000
Proceeds from rights offerings530,019
Removal of restriction on cash balance1,602
Payment to holders of claims under the Predecessor Credit Facility(1,947,357)
Payment to holders of claims under the Second Lien Notes(30,000)
Payment of Berry’s ad valorem taxes(23,366)
Payment of the rights offerings backstop commitment premium(15,900)
Payment of professional fees(13,043)
Funding of the professional fees escrow account(41,766)
Funding of the general unsecured claims cash distribution pool(40,000)
Changes in cash and cash equivalents$(679,811)
3)Primarily reflects the transfer to restricted cash to fund the Predecessor’s professional fees escrow account and general unsecured claims cash distribution pool.
4)Primarily reflects the write-off of the Predecessor’s deferred financing fees.
5)Reflects deferred tax assets recorded as of the Effective Date as determined in accordance with ASC 740. The deferred tax assets were primarily the result of the conversion from a limited liability company to a C corporation and differences in the accounting basis and tax basis of the Company’s oil and natural gas properties as of the Effective Date.
6)Reflects the capitalization of deferred financing fees related to the Successor’s revolving loan.

16

Table of Contents
LINN ENERGY, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – Continued
(Unaudited)

7)Net increase in accounts payable and accrued expenses reflects:
(in thousands) 
Recognition of payables for the professional fees escrow account$41,766
Recognition of payables for the general unsecured claims cash distribution pool40,000
Payment of professional fees(17,130)
Payment of Berry’s ad valorem taxes(23,366)
Other(4)
Net increase in accounts payable and accrued expenses$41,266
8)Reflects the settlement of the Predecessor Credit Facility through repayment of approximately $1.9 billion, net of the write-off of deferred financing fees and an increase of $25 million for the current portion of the Successor’s term loan.
9)Reflects a decrease of approximately $8 million for the payment of accrued interest on the Predecessor Credit Facility partially offset by an increase of approximately $7 million related to noncash share-based compensation classified as a liability related to the incentive interest awards issued by Holdco to certain members of its management (see Note 12).
10)Reflects borrowings of $900 million under the Successor Credit Facility, which includes a $600 million revolving loan and a $300 million term loan, net of $25 million for the current portion of the Successor’s term loan.
11)Reflects a reduction in deferred tax liabilities as determined in accordance with ASC 740.
12)Settlement of liabilities subject to compromise and the resulting net gain were determined as follows:
(in thousands) 
Accounts payable and accrued expenses$134,599
Accrued interest payable144,184
Debt4,023,129
Total liabilities subject to compromise4,301,912
Recognition of an additional claim for the Predecessor’s Second Lien Notes settlement1,000,000
Funding of the general unsecured claims cash distribution pool(40,000)
Payment to holders of claims under the Second Lien Notes(30,000)
Issuance of Class A common stock to creditors(1,507,162)
Gain on settlement of liabilities subject to compromise$3,724,750
13)Reflects redeemable noncontrolling interests classified as temporary equity related to the incentive interest awards issued by Holdco to certain members of its management. See Note 12 and Note 17 for additional information.

17

Table of Contents
LINN ENERGY, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – Continued
(Unaudited)

14)Net increase in capital accounts reflects:
(in thousands) 
Issuance of Class A common stock to creditors$1,507,162
Issuance of Class A common stock pursuant to the rights offerings530,019
Payment of the rights offerings backstop commitment premium(15,900)
Payment of issuance costs(50)
Share-based compensation expenses13,750
Cancellation of the Predecessor’s units issued and outstanding5,386,812
Par value of Class A common stock(89)
Change in additional paid-in capital7,421,704
Par value of Class A common stock89
Predecessor’s units issued and outstanding(5,386,812)
Net increase in capital accounts$2,034,981
See Note 11 for additional information on the issuances of the Successor’s equity.
15)Net decrease in accumulated deficit reflects:
(in thousands) 
Recognition of gain on settlement of liabilities subject to compromise$3,724,750
Recognition of an additional claim for the Predecessor’s Second Lien Notes settlement(1,000,000)
Recognition of professional fees(37,680)
Write-off of deferred financing fees(16,728)
Recognition of deferred income taxes264,889
Total reorganization items, net2,935,231
Share-based compensation expenses(50,255)
Other(236)
Net decrease in accumulated deficit$2,884,740
Fresh Start Adjustments:
16)Reflects a change in accounting policy from the entitlements method to the sales method for natural gas production imbalances.
17)Reflects the recognition of intangible assets for the current portion of favorable leases, partially offset by decreases for well equipment inventory and the write-off of historical intangible assets.

18

Table of Contents
LINN ENERGY, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – Continued
(Unaudited)

18)Reflects a decrease of oil and natural gas properties, based on the methodology discussed above, and the elimination of accumulated depletion and amortization. The following table summarizes the components of oil and natural gas properties as of the Effective Date:
 Successor  Predecessor
 Fair Value  Historical Book Value
(in thousands)    
Proved properties$2,186,777
  $12,258,835
Unproved properties
  1,010,200
 2,186,777
  13,269,035
Less accumulated depletion and amortization
  (10,044,240)
 $2,186,777
  $3,224,795
19)Reflects a decrease of other property and equipment and the elimination of accumulated depreciation. The following table summarizes the components of other property and equipment as of the Effective Date:
 Successor  Predecessor
 Fair Value  Historical Book Value
(in thousands)    
Natural gas plants and pipelines$342,924
  $426,914
Office equipment and furniture39,211
  106,059
Buildings and leasehold improvements32,817
  66,023
Vehicles16,980
  30,760
Land7,747
  3,727
Drilling and other equipment4,254
  8,103
 443,933
  641,586
Less accumulated depreciation
  (230,952)
 $443,933
  $410,634
In estimating the fair value of other property and equipment, the Company used a combination of cost and market approaches. A cost approach was used to value the Company’s natural gas plants and pipelines and other operating assets, based on current replacement costs of the assets less depreciation based on the estimated economic useful lives of the assets and age of the assets. A market approach was used to value the Company’s vehicles and land, using recent transactions of similar assets to determine the fair value from a market participant perspective.
20)Reflects the recognition of intangible assets for the noncurrent portion of favorable leases, as well as increases in equity method investments and carbon credit allowances. Assets and liabilities for out-of-market contracts were valued based on market terms as of February 28, 2017, and will be amortized over the remaining life of the respective lease. The Company’s equity method investments were valued based on a market approach using a market EBITDA multiple. Carbon credit allowances were valued using a market approach based on trading prices for carbon credits on February 28, 2017.
21)Primarily reflects the write-off of deferred rent partially offset by an increase in carbon emissions liabilities.
22)Reflects an increase of the current portion of asset retirement obligations.
23)Primarily reflects a decrease of approximately $49 million for asset retirement obligations and approximately $5 million for deferred rent, partially offset by an increase of approximately $1 million for carbon emissions liabilities. The fair value

19

Table of Contents
LINN ENERGY, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – Continued
(Unaudited)

of asset retirement obligations were estimated using valuation techniques that convert future cash flows to a single discounted amount. Significant inputs to the valuation include estimates of: (i) plug and abandon costs per well based on existing regulatory requirements; (ii) remaining life per well; (iii) future inflation factors; and (iv) a credit-adjusted risk-free interest rate. Carbon emissions liabilities were valued using a market approach based on trading prices for carbon credits on February 28, 2017.
24)Reflects the cumulative impact of the fresh start accounting adjustments discussed above and the elimination of the Predecessor’s accumulated deficit.
Note 4 – Discontinued Operations, Other Divestitures and Joint Venture
Discontinued Operations
On July 31, 2017, the Company completed the sale of its interest in properties located in the San Joaquin Basin in California to Berry Petroleum Company, LLC (DEBTOR-IN-POSSESSION)(the “San Joaquin Basin Sale”) and received cash proceeds of approximately $257 million.
On July 21, 2017, the Company completed the sale of its interest in properties located in the Los Angeles Basin in California to Bridge Energy LLC (the “Los Angeles Basin Sale”) and received cash proceeds of approximately $94 million. The Company will receive an additional $7 million contingent payment if certain operational requirements are satisfied within one year.
As a result of the Company’s strategic exit from California (completed by the San Joaquin Basin Sale and Los Angeles Basin Sale), the Company classified the assets and liabilities, results of operations and cash flows of its California properties as discontinued operations on its condensed consolidated financial statements.
On December 3, 2016, LINN Energy filed an amended plan of reorganization that excluded Berry (see Note 2). As a result of its loss of control of Berry, LINN Energy concluded that it was appropriate to deconsolidate Berry effective on the aforementioned date and classified it as discontinued operations.
The following table presents carrying amounts of the assets and liabilities of the Company’s California properties classified as discontinued operations on the condensed consolidated balance sheets:
 Successor  Predecessor
 June 30, 2017  December 31, 2016
(in thousands)    
Assets:    
Oil and natural gas properties$213,442
  $728,190
Other property and equipment11,339
  11,402
Other10,862
  1,435
Total assets of discontinued operations$235,643
  $741,027
Liabilities:    
Asset retirement obligations$26,774
  $38,042
Other1,444
  1,481
Total liabilities of discontinued operations$28,218
  $39,523
All balances of discontinued operations on the condensed consolidated balance sheets relate to the Company’s California properties, as Berry was deconsolidated effective December 3, 2016. At June 30, 2017, the carrying values of the California properties were reduced to fair value less costs to sell, resulting in an impairment charge of approximately $13 million for the three months and four months ended June 30, 2017. The impairment charge is included in “income (loss) from discontinued

20

Table of Contents
LINN ENERGY, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – Continued
(Unaudited)

operations, net of income taxes” on the condensed consolidated statements of operations. Other assets primarily include restricted cash and inventories, and other liabilities primarily include carbon emissions liabilities. All assets and liabilities related to the California properties were classified as current on the condensed consolidated balance sheet as of June 30, 2017.
The following tables present summarized financial results of the Company’s California properties and Berry classified as discontinued operations on the condensed consolidated statements of operations:
 Successor  Predecessor
 Three Months Ended June 30, 2017  Three Months Ended June 30, 2016
(in thousands)    
Revenues and other$20,511
  $129,245
Expenses25,935
  156,176
Other income and (expenses)(2,074)  (18,190)
Reorganization items, net
  49,086
Income (loss) from discontinued operations before income taxes(7,498)  3,965
Income tax expense (benefit)(4,176)  164
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of income taxes$(3,322)  $3,801

 Successor  Predecessor
 Four Months Ended June 30, 2017  Two Months Ended February 28, 2017 Six Months Ended June 30, 2016
(in thousands)      
Revenues and other$27,636
  $14,891
 $235,949
Expenses30,344
  13,758
 1,375,480
Other income and (expenses)(2,791)  (1,681) (39,470)
Reorganization items, net
  
 49,086
Loss from discontinued operations before income taxes(5,499)  (548) (1,129,915)
Income tax expense (benefit)(2,245)  
 162
Loss from discontinued operations, net of income taxes$(3,254)  $(548) $(1,130,077)
Results of operations of Berry are only included in the three months and six months ended June 30, 2016, as Berry was deconsolidated effective December 3, 2016. Other income and (expenses) include an allocation of interest expense for the California properties of approximately $2 million for each of the three months ended June 30, 2017, and June 30, 2016, and approximately $3 million, $2 million and $3 million for the four months ended June 30, 2017, the two months ended February 28, 2017, and the six months ended June 30, 2016, respectively, which represents interest on debt that was required to be repaid as a result of the sales.
Berry Transition Services and Separation Agreement
On the Effective Date, Berry entered into a Transition Services and Separation Agreement (the “TSSA”) with LINN Energy and certain of its subsidiaries to facilitate the separation of Berry’s operations from LINN Energy’s operations. Pursuant to the TSSA, LINN Energy continued to provide, or caused to be provided, certain administrative, management, operating, and other services and support to Berry during a transitional period following the Effective Date (the “Transition Services”).

21

Table of Contents
LINN ENERGY, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – Continued
(Unaudited)

Under the TSSA, Berry reimbursed LINN Energy for any and all reasonable, third-party out-of-pocket costs and expenses, without markup, actually incurred by LINN Energy, to the extent documented, in connection with providing the Transition Services. Additionally, Berry paid to LINN Energy a management fee of $6 million per month, prorated for partial months, during the period from the Effective Date through the last day of the second full calendar month after the Effective Date (the “Transition Period”) and paid $2.7 million per month, prorated for partial months, from the first day following the Transition Period through the last day of the second full calendar month thereafter (the “Accounting Period”). During the Accounting Period, the scope of the Transition Services was reduced to specified accounting and administrative functions. The Transition Period ended April 30, 2017, and the Accounting Period ended June 30, 2017.
Other Divestitures
On June 30, 2017, the Company completed the sale of its interest in properties located in the Salt Creek Field in Wyoming to Denbury Resources Inc. (the “Salt Creek Assets Sale”). Cash proceeds received from the sale of these properties were approximately $76 million and the Company recognized a net gain of approximately $22 million.
On May 31, 2017, the Company completed the sale of its interest in properties located in western Wyoming to Jonah Energy LLC (the “Jonah Assets Sale”). Cash proceeds received from the sale of these properties were approximately $560 million, net of costs to sell of approximately $6 million, and the Company recognized a net gain of approximately $279 million.
On May 9, 2017, the Company completed the sale of undeveloped acreage located in Ward County, Texas and received cash proceeds of approximately $4 million.
The three divestitures discussed above are not presented as discontinued operations because they do not represent a strategic shift that will have a major effect on the Company’s operations and financial results. The gains on these divestitures are included in “gains (losses) on sale of assets and other, net” on the condensed consolidated statements of operations.
Divestitures – Subsequent Events
On August 1, 2017, and July 31, 2017, the Company completed the sales of its interest in certain properties located in south Texas (the “South Texas Assets Sales”) related to definitive purchase and sale agreements entered into in June 2017 and received cash proceeds of approximately $9 million and approximately $23 million, respectively.
On July 28, 2017, the Company completed the sale of undeveloped acreage located in Lea and Eddy counties in New Mexico (the “Permian Acreage Sale”) related to a definitive purchase and sale agreement entered into in June 2017 and received cash proceeds of approximately $21 million.
Joint Venture – Pending
On June 27, 2017, the Company, through certain of its wholly owned subsidiaries, entered into an agreement with Citizen Energy II, LLC (“Citizen”) in which LINN Energy and Citizen will each contribute certain upstream assets located in Oklahoma to a newly formed company, Roan Resources LLC (“Roan”), focused on the accelerated development of the Merge/SCOOP/STACK play in the Mid-Continent region. In exchange for their respective contributions, LINN Energy and Citizen will equally split the equity interest in Roan. The transaction is anticipated to close in the third quarter of 2017, subject to closing conditions. There can be no assurance that all of the conditions to closing will be satisfied.
Assets and Liabilities Held For Sale
The assets and liabilities associated with the South Texas Assets Sales and the Permian Acreage Sale, as well as the properties to be contributed in the pending Roan joint venture, are classified as “held for sale” on the condensed consolidated balance sheet. At June 30, 2017, the Company’s condensed consolidated balance sheet included current assets of approximately $236 million included in “assets held for sale” and current liabilities of approximately $36 million included in “liabilities held for sale” related to these transactions.

22

Table of Contents
LINN ENERGY, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – Continued
(Unaudited)

The following table summarizespresents carrying amounts of the componentsassets and liabilities of reorganization items includedthe Company’s properties classified as held for sale on the condensed consolidated statements of operations:balance sheet:
 Three Months and Six Months Ended June 30, 2016
 (in thousands)
  
Legal and other professional advisory fees$(20,510)
Unamortized deferred financing fees, discounts and premiums(41,122)
Gain related to interest payable on the 12.00% senior secured second lien notes due December 2020 (1)
551,000
Terminated contracts45,109
Other407
Reorganization items, net$534,884
(1)
Represents a noncash gain on the write-off of postpetition contractual interest through maturity, recorded to reflect the carrying value of the liability subject to compromise at its estimated allowed claim amount.
Effect of Filing on Creditors and Unitholders
 Successor
 June 30, 2017
 (in thousands)
  
Assets: 
Oil and natural gas properties$224,918
Other property and equipment11,070
Other433
Total assets held for sale$236,421
Liabilities: 
Asset retirement obligations$21,210
Other15,177
Total liabilities held for sale$36,387
Subject to certain exceptions, under the Bankruptcy Code, the filing of Bankruptcy Petitions automatically enjoined, or stayed, the continuation of most judicial or administrative proceedings or filing of other actions against the Debtors or their property to recover, collect or secure a claim arising prior to the Petition Date. Absent an order of the Bankruptcy Court, substantially all of the Debtors’ prepetition liabilities are subject to settlement under the Bankruptcy Code. Although the filing of Bankruptcy Petitions triggered defaults on the Debtors’ debt obligations, creditors are stayed from taking any actions against the Debtors as a result of such defaults, subject to certain limited exceptions permitted by the Bankruptcy Code. The Company did not record interest expense on its 12.00% senior secured second lien notes (“Second Lien Notes”) or senior notes for the period from May 12, 2016, through June 30, 2016. For that period, contractual interest on the Second Lien Notes and senior notes was approximately $54 million.
Under the Bankruptcy Code, unless creditors agree otherwise, prepetition liabilities and postpetition liabilities must be satisfied in full before the holders of the Company’s existing common units representing limited liability company interests (“units”) are entitled to receive any settlement or retain any property under a plan of reorganization. The ultimate recovery to creditors and/or unitholders, if any, will not be determined until confirmation and implementation of a plan or plans of reorganization. No assurance can be given as to what values, if any, will be ascribed in the Chapter 11 proceedings to each of these constituencies or what types or amounts of settlements, if any, they will receive. A plan of reorganization could result in holders of the Debtors’ liabilities and/or units receiving no settlement on account of their interests and cancellation of their holdings.
Appointment of Creditors Committee
On May 23, 2016, the Bankruptcy Court appointed the official committee for unsecured creditors (the “Creditors Committee”). The Creditors Committee and its legal representatives have a right to be heard on all matters that come before the Bankruptcy Court with respect to the Debtors.
Rejection of Executory Contracts
Subject to certain exceptions, under the Bankruptcy Code, the Debtors may assume, assign or reject certain executory contracts and unexpired leases subject to the approval of the Bankruptcy Court and satisfaction of certain other conditions. Generally, the rejection of an executory contract or unexpired lease is treated as a prepetition breach of such executory contract or unexpired lease and, subject to certain exceptions, relieves the Debtors of performing their future obligations under such executory contract or unexpired lease but entitles the contract counterparty or lessor to a prepetition general unsecured claim for damages caused by such deemed breach. Counterparties to such rejected contracts or leases may assert unsecured claims in the Bankruptcy Court against the applicable Debtors’ estate for damages. Generally, the assumption of an executory contract or

9

Table of Contents
LINN ENERGY, LLC (DEBTOR-IN-POSSESSION)
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – Continued
(Unaudited)

unexpired lease requires the Debtors to cure existing monetary defaults under such executory contract or unexpired lease and provide adequate assurance of future performance. Accordingly, any description of an executory contract or unexpired lease with any of the Debtors in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, including where applicable a quantification of the Company’s obligations under any such executory contract or unexpired lease with the applicable Debtor, is qualified by any overriding rejection rights the Company has under the Bankruptcy Code. Further, nothing herein is or shall be deemed an admission with respect to any claim amounts or calculations arising from the rejection of any executory contract or unexpired lease and the Debtors expressly preserve all of their rights with respect thereto.
Process for Plan of Reorganization
In order to successfully exit bankruptcy, the Debtors will need to propose, and obtain confirmation by the Bankruptcy Court of, a Plan that satisfies the requirements of the Bankruptcy Code. A Plan would, among other things, resolve the Debtors’ prepetition obligations, set forth the revised capital structure of the newly reorganized entity and provide for corporate governance subsequent to exit from bankruptcy.
The Debtors have an exclusive right to file a Plan within 120 days from the Petition Date, subject to an extension for cause. If the Debtors’ exclusive filing period lapses, any party in interest may file a Plan for any of the Debtors.
In addition to being voted on by holders of impaired claims and equity interests, a Plan must satisfy certain requirements of the Bankruptcy Code and must be approved, or confirmed, by the Bankruptcy Court in order to become effective. A Plan would be accepted by holders of claims against and equity interests in the Debtors if (i) at least one-half in number and two-thirds in dollar amount of claims actually voting in each class of claims impaired by the Plan have voted to accept the Plan and (ii) at least two-thirds in amount of equity interests impaired by the Plan actually voting has voted to accept the Plan. A class of claims or equity interests that does not receive or retain any property under the Plan on account of such claims or interests is deemed to have voted to reject the Plan.
Under certain circumstances set forth in Section 1129(b) of the Bankruptcy Code, the Bankruptcy Court may confirm a Plan even if such Plan has not been accepted by all impaired classes of claims and equity interests. The precise requirements and evidentiary showing for confirming a Plan notwithstanding its rejection by one or more impaired classes of claims or equity interests depends upon a number of factors, including the status and seniority of the claims or equity interests in the rejecting class (i.e., unsecured or secured claims, subordinated or senior claims). Generally, with respect to units, a Plan may be “crammed down” even if the unitholders receive no recovery if the proponent of the Plan demonstrates that (1) no class junior to the units are receiving or retaining property under the Plan and (2) no class of claims or interests senior to the units are being paid more than in full.
The timing of filing a Plan by the Debtors will depend on the timing and outcome of numerous other ongoing matters in the Chapter 11 proceedings. Although the Debtors expect to file a Plan that provides for emergence from bankruptcy as a going concern, there can be no assurance at this time that the Debtors will be able to successfully develop, confirm and consummate one or more plans of reorganization or other alternative restructuring transactions, including a sale of all or substantially all of the Debtors’Other assets that satisfies the conditions of the Bankruptcy Code and is confirmed by the Bankruptcy Court, or that any such Plan will be implemented successfully.
As of August 4, 2016, the Debtors have not yet filed a Plan.
Ability to Continue as a Going Concern
Continued low commodity prices have resulted in significantly lower levels of cash flow from operating activities and have limited the Company’s ability to access the capital markets. In addition, each of the Company’s Credit Facilities is subject to scheduled redeterminations of its borrowing base, semi-annually in April and October, based primarily on reserve reports using lender commodity price expectations at such time. The lenders under the Credit Facilities agreed to defer the April 2016 borrowing base redeterminations to May 11, 2016. Continued low commodity prices, reductions in the Company’s capital budget and the resulting reserve write-downs, along with the termination of the Company’s hedges, were expected to adversely impact upcoming redeterminations and have a significant negative impact on the Company’s liquidity. The Company’s filing of

10

Table of Contents
LINN ENERGY, LLC (DEBTOR-IN-POSSESSION)
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – Continued
(Unaudited)

the Bankruptcy Petitions constituted an event of default that accelerated the Company’s obligations under its Credit Facilities, its Second Lien Notes and its senior notes.
The significant risks and uncertainties related to the Company’s liquidity and Chapter 11 proceedings described above raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. The condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis of accounting, which contemplates continuity of operations, realization of assets, and satisfaction of liabilities and commitments in the normal course of business. The condensed consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of the going concern uncertainty. If the Company cannot continue as a going concern, adjustments to the carrying values and classification of its assets and liabilities and the reported amounts of income and expenses could be required and could be material.
In order to decrease the Company’s level of indebtedness and maintain the Company’s liquidity at levels sufficient to meet its commitments, the Company undertook a number of actions, including minimizing capital expenditures and further reducing its recurring operating expenses. Despite taking these actions, the Company did not have sufficient liquidity to satisfy its debt service obligations, meet other financial obligations and comply with its debt covenants. As a result, the Debtors filed Bankruptcy Petitions for relief under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code.
Covenant Violations
The Company’s filing of the Bankruptcy Petitions constituted an event of default that accelerated the Company’s obligations under its Credit Facilities, its Second Lien Notes and its senior notes. Additionally, other events of default, including cross-defaults, are present, including the failure to make interest payments on the Company’s Second Lien Notes and certain of its senior notes, as well as the receipt of a going concern explanatory paragraph from the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm on the Company’s consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2015. Under the Bankruptcy Code, the creditors under these debt agreements are stayed from taking any action against the Company as a result of an event of default. See Note 6 for additional details about the Company’s debt.
Credit Facilities
The Company’s Credit Facilities contain a requirement to deliver audited consolidated financial statements without a going concern or like qualification or exception. Consequently, the filing of the Company’s 2015 Annual Report on Form 10-K which included such explanatory paragraph resulted in a default under the LINN Credit Facility as of the filing date, March 15, 2016, subject to a 30 day grace period.
On April 12, 2016, the Company entered into amendments to both the LINN Credit Facility and Berry Credit Facility. The amendments provided for, among other things, an agreement that (i) certain events (the “Specified Events”) would not become defaults or events of default until May 11, 2016, (ii) the borrowing bases would remain constant until May 11, 2016, unless reduced as a result of swap agreement terminations or collateral sales and (iii) the Company, the administrative agent and the lenders would negotiate in good faith the terms of a restructuring support agreement in furtherance of a restructuring of the capital structure of the Company and its subsidiaries. In addition, the amendment to the Berry Credit Facility provided Berry with access to previously restricted cash of $45 million in order to fund ordinary course operations.
Pursuant to the amendments, the Specified Events consisted of:
The receipt of a going concern qualification or explanatory statement in the auditors’ report on the Company’s consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2015;
The receipt of a going concern qualification or explanatory statement in the auditors’ report on Berry’s financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2015;
The failure of the Company or Berry to make certain interest payments on their unsecured notes;
Any cross-defaults that may arise on account of any of the foregoing, provided that no event of default is continuing under any document giving rise to such cross default; and
Any failure to provide notice of any of the events described above.

11

Table of Contents
LINN ENERGY, LLC (DEBTOR-IN-POSSESSION)
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – Continued
(Unaudited)

The Specified Events listed in the amendment to the Berry Credit Facility also included the failure to maintain the ratio of Adjusted EBITDAX to Interest Expense (as each term is defined in the Berry Credit Facility) (“Interest Coverage Ratio”).
As a condition to closing the amendments, in April 2016, (a) the Company made a $100 million permanent repayment of a portion of the borrowings outstanding under the LINN Credit Facility and (b) the Company and certain of its subsidiaries provided control agreements over certain deposit accounts.
Pursuant to the terms of the amendment to the LINN Credit Facility and as a result of the execution of the Restructuring Support Agreement, in May 2016, the Company made a $350 million permanent repayment of a portion of the borrowings outstanding under the LINN Credit Facility.
The filing of the Bankruptcy Petitions constituted an event of default that accelerated the Company’s obligations under the Credit Facilities. However, under the Bankruptcy Code, the creditors under these debt agreements are stayed from taking any action against the Company as a result of the default.
Second Lien Notes
The indenture governing the Second Lien Notes (“Second Lien Indenture”) required the Company to deliver mortgages by February 18, 2016, subject to a 45 day grace period. The Company elected to exercise its right to the grace period, which resulted in the Company being in default under the Second Lien Indenture.
On April 4, 2016, the Company entered into a settlement agreement with certain holders of the Second Lien Notes and agreed to deliver, and make arrangements for recordation of, the mortgages. The Company has since delivered and made arrangements for recordation of the mortgages.
The settlement agreement required the parties to commence good faith negotiations with each other regarding the terms of a potential comprehensive and consensual restructuring, including a potential restructuring under a Chapter 11 plan of reorganization. The settlement agreement provided that in the event the parties were unable to reach agreement on the terms of a consensual restructuring on or before the commencement of such Chapter 11 proceedings (or such later date as mutually agreed to by the parties), the parties would support entry by the Bankruptcy Court of a settlement order that, among other things, (i) approves the issuance of additional notes, in the principal amount of $1.0 billion plus certain accrued interest, on a proportionate basis to existing holders of the Second Lien Notes and (ii) releases the mortgagesinventories and other collateral upon the issuance of the additional notes (the “Settlement Order”).
The settlement agreement will terminate upon, among other events, entry by the Bankruptcy Court of a final, non-appealable order denying the Company’s motion seeking entry of the Settlement Order.
The Company failed to make an interest payment of approximately $68 million due June 15, 2016, on the Second Lien Notes.
The filing of the Bankruptcy Petitions constituted an event of default that accelerated the Company’s obligations under the Second Lien Indenture. However, under the Bankruptcy Code, holders of the Second Lien Notes are stayed from taking any action against the Company as a result of the default.
Senior Notes
The Company deferred making interest payments totaling approximately $60 million due March 15, 2016, including approximately $30 million on LINN Energy’s 7.75% senior notes due February 2021, approximately $12 million on LINN Energy’s 6.50% senior notes due September 2021 and approximately $18 million on Berry’s 6.375% senior notes due September 2022, which resulted in the Company being in default under these senior notes. The indentures governing each of the applicable series of notes provided the Company a 30 day grace period to make the interest payments.
On April 14, 2016, within the 30 day interest payment grace period provided for in the indentures governing the notes, the Company and Berry made interest payments of approximately $60 million in satisfaction of their respective obligations.

12

Table of Contents
LINN ENERGY, LLC (DEBTOR-IN-POSSESSION)
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – Continued
(Unaudited)

The Company failed to make an interest payment of approximately $31 million due April 15, 2016, on LINN Energy’s 8.625% senior notes due April 2020, interest payments due May 1, 2016, of approximately $18 million on LINN Energy’s 6.25% senior notes due November 2019 and approximately $9 million on Berry’s 6.75% senior notes due November 2020, and an interest payment of approximately $18 million due May 15, 2016, on LINN Energy’s 6.50% senior notes due May 2019.
The filing of the Bankruptcy Petitions constituted an event of default that accelerated the Company’s obligations under the indentures governing the senior notes. However, under the Bankruptcy Code, holders of the senior notes are stayed from taking any action against the Company as a result of the default.liabilities primarily include accounts payable.
Note 3 – Unitholders’ Deficit
Delisting from Stock Exchange
As a result of the Company’s failure to comply with the NASDAQ Global Select Market (“NASDAQ”) continued listing requirements, on May 24, 2016, the Company’s units began trading over the counter on the OTC Markets Group Inc.’s Pink marketplace under the trading symbol “LINEQ.”
At-the-Market Offering Program
The Company’s Board of Directors has authorized the sale of up to $500 million of units under an at-the-market offering program. Subject to approval by the Bankruptcy Court, sales of units, if any, will be made under an equity distribution agreement by means of ordinary brokers’ transactions, through the facilities of a national securities exchange or facility thereof, a trading facility of a national securities association or an alternate trading system, to or through a market maker or directly on or through an electronic communication network, a “dark pool” or any similar market venue, at market prices, in block transactions, or as otherwise agreed with a sales agent. The Company expects to use the net proceeds from any sale of units for general corporate purposes, which may include, among other things, capital expenditures, acquisitions and the repayment of debt.
No sales were made under the equity distribution agreement during the six months ended June 30, 2016. During the six months ended June 30, 2015, the Company, under its equity distribution agreement, sold 3,621,983 units representing limited liability company interests at an average price of $12.37 per unit for net proceeds of approximately $44 million (net of approximately $448,000 in commissions). In connection with the issuance and sale of these units, the Company also incurred professional services expenses of approximately $459,000. The Company used the net proceeds for general corporate purposes, including the open market repurchases of a portion of its senior notes (see Note 6). At June 30, 2016, units totaling approximately $455 million in aggregate offering price remained available to be sold under the agreement.
Distributions
Under the Company’s limited liability company agreement, unitholders are entitled to receive a distribution of available cash, which includes cash on hand plus borrowings less any reserves established by the Company’s Board of Directors to provide for the proper conduct of the Company’s business (including reserves for future capital expenditures, including drilling, acquisitions and anticipated future credit needs) or to fund distributions, if any, over the next four quarters. Monthly distributions were paid by the Company through September 2015. In October 2015, the Company’s Board of Directors determined to suspend payment of the Company’s distribution. The Company’s Board of Directors will continue to evaluate the Company’s ability to reinstate the distribution; however, as a result of the Chapter 11 proceedings, the Company cannot pay any distributions without the prior approval of the Bankruptcy Court. Distributions paid by the Company during 2015 are presented on the condensed consolidated statement of cash flows.

13

Table of Contents
LINN ENERGY, LLC (DEBTOR-IN-POSSESSION)
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – Continued
(Unaudited)

Note 45 – Oil and Natural Gas Properties
Oil and Natural Gas Capitalized Costs
As a result of the application of fresh start accounting, the Company recorded its oil and natural gas properties at fair value as of the Effective Date. The fair values of oil and natural gas properties are estimated using valuation techniques consistent with the income approach, converting future cash flows to a single discounted amount. Significant inputs used to determine the fair values of proved and unproved properties include estimates of: (i) reserves; (ii) future operating and development costs; (iii) future commodity prices; and (iv) a market-based weighted average cost of capital rate. These inputs require significant judgments and estimates by the Company’s management at the time of the valuation and are the most sensitive and subject to change. The fair value was estimated using inputs characteristic of a Level 3 fair value measurement. Aggregate capitalized costs related to oil, natural gas and NGL production activities with applicable accumulated depletion and amortization are presented below:
 June 30,
2016
 December 31,
2015
 (in thousands)
Proved properties:   
Leasehold acquisition$13,372,326
 $13,361,171
Development3,015,885
 2,976,643
Unproved properties1,776,439
 1,783,341
 18,164,650
 18,121,155
Less accumulated depletion and amortization(12,514,642) (11,097,492)
 $5,650,008
 $7,023,663
 Successor  Predecessor
 June 30, 2017  December 31, 2016
(in thousands)    
Proved properties$1,443,916
  $11,350,257
Unproved properties194
  998,860
 1,444,110
  12,349,117
Less accumulated depletion and amortization(37,572)  (9,843,908)
 $1,406,538
  $2,505,209
Impairment of Proved Properties
The Company evaluates the impairment of its proved oil and natural gas properties on a field-by-field basis whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable. The carrying values of proved properties are reduced to fair value when the expected undiscounted future cash flows of proved and risk-adjusted probable and possible reserves are less than net book value. The fair values

23

Table of proved properties are measured using valuation techniques consistent with the income approach, converting future cash flows to a single discounted amount. Significant inputs used to determine the fair values of proved properties include estimates of: (i) reserves; (ii) future operating and development costs; (iii) future commodity prices; and (iv) a market-based weighted average cost of capital rate. These inputs require significant judgments and estimates by the Company’s management at the time of the valuation and are the most sensitive and subject to change.Contents
LINN ENERGY, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – Continued
(Unaudited)

Based on the analysis described above, for the six months ended June 30, 2016, the Company recorded the following noncashan impairment charges (before and after tax)charge of approximately $123 million associated with proved oil and natural gas properties:
 Six Months Ended
June 30,
 2016 2015
 (in thousands)
    
California region$984,288
 $207,200
Mid-Continent region129,703
 5,703
Rockies region26,677
 
Hugoton Basin region
 277,914
TexLa region
 33,100
South Texas region
 8,700
 $1,140,668
 $532,617
The Company recorded no impairment charges for proved properties forin the three months ended June 30, 2016, or June 30, 2015. The impairment charges in 2016 wereMid-Continent region due to a decline in commodity prices, changes in expected capital development and a decline in the Company’s estimates of proved reserves. The impairment charges in 2015 were due to a decline in commodity prices. The carrying values of the impaired proved properties were reduced to fair value, estimated using inputs characteristic of a Level 3 fair value measurement. The impairment charges are included in “impairment of long-lived assets” on the condensed consolidated statementsstatement of operations.

14

Table of Contents
LINN ENERGY, LLC (DEBTOR-IN-POSSESSION)
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – Continued
(Unaudited)

Impairment of Unproved Properties
The Company evaluates the impairment of its unproved oil and natural gas properties whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable. The carrying values of unproved properties are reduced to fair value based on management’s experience in similar situations and other factors such as the lease terms of the properties and the relative proportion of such properties on which proved reserves have been found in the past. For the six months ended June 30, 2016, the Company recorded noncash impairment charges (before and after tax) of approximately $13 million associated with unproved oil and natural gas properties in California. The Company recorded no impairment charges for unproved properties forthe six months ended June 30, 2017, or the three months ended June 30, 2016, or the six months ended June 30, 2015.
The impairment charges in 2016 were due to a decline in commodity prices and changes in expected capital development. The carrying values of the impaired unproved properties were reduced to fair value, estimated using inputs characteristic of a Level 3 fair value measurement. The impairment charges are included in “impairment of long-lived assets” on the condensed consolidated statement of operations.2016.
Note 5 – Unit-Based Compensation
The Company granted no unit-based awards during the six months ended June 30, 2016. A summary of unit-based compensation expenses included on the condensed consolidated statements of operations is presented below:
 Three Months Ended
June 30,
 Six Months Ended
June 30,
 2016 2015 2016 2015
 (in thousands)
        
General and administrative expenses$4,946
 $11,044
 $14,406
 $27,677
Lease operating expenses1,182
 2,157
 4,147
 6,034
Total unit-based compensation expenses$6,128
 $13,201
 $18,553
 $33,711
Income tax benefit$2,264
 $4,877
 $6,855
 $12,456
Cash-Based Performance Unit Awards
In January 2015, the Company granted 567,320 performance units (the maximum number of units available to be earned) to certain executive officers. The 2015 performance unit awards vest three years from the award date. The vesting of these units is determined based on the Company’s performance compared to the performance of a predetermined group of peer companies over a specified performance period, and the value of vested units is to be paid in cash. To date, no performance units have vested and no amounts have been paid to settle any such awards. Performance unit awards that are settled in cash are recorded as a liability with the changes in fair value recognized over the vesting period. Based on the performance criteria, there was no liability recorded for these performance unit awards at June 30, 2016.

15

Table of Contents
LINN ENERGY, LLC (DEBTOR-IN-POSSESSION)
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – Continued
(Unaudited)

Note 6 – Debt
The following summarizes the Company’s outstanding debt:
 
June 30,
2016
 December 31, 2015
 (in thousands, except percentages)
    
LINN credit facility (1)
$1,654,745
 $2,215,000
Berry credit facility (2)
874,959
 873,175
Term loan (2)
284,241
 500,000
6.50% senior notes due May 2019562,234
 562,234
6.25% senior notes due November 2019581,402
 581,402
8.625% senior notes due April 2020718,596
 718,596
6.75% Berry senior notes due November 2020261,100
 261,100
12.00% senior secured second lien notes due December 2020 (3)
1,000,000
 1,000,000
Interest payable on senior secured second lien notes due December 2020 (3)

 608,333
7.75% senior notes due February 2021779,474
 779,474
6.50% senior notes due September 2021381,423
 381,423
6.375% Berry senior notes due September 2022572,700
 572,700
Net unamortized discounts and premiums (4)

 (8,694)
Net unamortized deferred financing fees (4)
(1,536) (37,374)
Total debt, net7,669,338
 9,007,369
Less current portion, net (5)
(2,812,409) (3,714,693)
Less liabilities subject to compromise (6)
(4,856,929) 
Long-term debt, net$
 $5,292,676
 Successor  Predecessor
 June 30, 2017  December 31, 2016
(in thousands, except percentages)    
Successor revolving loan (1)
$183,430
  $
Predecessor credit facility (2)

  1,654,745
Predecessor term loan (2)

  284,241
6.50% senior notes due May 2019
  562,234
6.25% senior notes due November 2019
  581,402
8.625% senior notes due April 2020
  718,596
12.00% senior secured second lien notes due December 2020
  1,000,000
7.75% senior notes due February 2021
  779,474
6.50% senior notes due September 2021
  381,423
Net unamortized deferred financing fees
  (1,257)
Total debt, net183,430
  5,960,858
Less current portion, net (3)

  (1,937,729)
Less liabilities subject to compromise (4)

  (4,023,129)
Long-term debt$183,430
  $
(1) 
Variable interest ratesrate of 5.25% and 2.66% 4.59%at June 30, 2016, and December 31, 2015, respectively.2017.
(2) 
Variable interest ratesrate of 5.25% and 3.17% 5.50%at June 30, 2016, and December 31, 2015, respectively.2016.
(3) 
The issuance ofDue to covenant violations, the Second Lien Notes was accounted for as a troubled debt restructuring, which requires that interest payments on the Second Lien Notes reduce the carrying value of the debt with no interest expense recognized. During the three months ended June 30, 2016, $551 million was written off to reorganization items in connection with the filing of the Bankruptcy Petitions. The remaining amount of approximately $57 million wasPredecessor’s credit facility and term loan were classified as liabilities subject to compromisecurrent at June 30,December 31, 2016.
(4) 
Approximately $41 million in net discounts, premiums and deferred financing fees were written off to reorganization items in connection with the filing of the Bankruptcy Petitions.
(5)
Due to existing and anticipated covenant violations, the Company’s Credit Facilities and term loan were classified as current at June 30, 2016, and December 31, 2015. The current portion as of December 31, 2015, also includes approximately $128 million of interest payable on the Second Lien Notes due within one year.
(6)
The Company’sPredecessor’s senior notes and Second Lien Notes were classified as liabilities subject to compromise at June 30,December 31, 2016. On the Effective Date, pursuant to the terms of the Plan, all outstanding amounts under these debt instruments were canceled.
Fair Value
The Company’s debt is recorded at the carrying amount on the condensed consolidated balance sheets. The carrying amounts of the Company’s credit facilities and term loanloans approximate fair value because the interest rates are variable and reflective of market rates. The Company usesused a market approach to determine the fair value of its senior secured second lien notesthe Predecessor’s Second Lien Notes and senior notes using estimates based on prices quoted from third-party financial institutions, which is a Level 2 fair value measurement.

1624

Table of Contents
LINN ENERGY, LLC (DEBTOR-IN-POSSESSION)INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – Continued
(Unaudited)

Predecessor
June 30, 2016 December 31, 2015December 31, 2016
Carrying Value Fair Value Carrying Value Fair ValueCarrying Value Fair Value
(in thousands)(in thousands)
          
Senior secured second lien notes$1,000,000
 $338,750
 $1,000,000
 $501,250
$1,000,000
 $863,750
Senior notes, net3,856,929
 775,403
 3,812,676
 662,179
3,023,129
 1,179,224
Credit Facilities
LINNSuccessor Credit Facility
The Company’s Sixth AmendedOn the Effective Date, pursuant to the terms of the Plan, the Company entered into the Successor Credit Facility with Holdco II as borrower and Restated Credit Agreement (“LINN Credit Facility”) provides for (1)Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as administrative agent, providing for: 1) a senior securedreserve-based revolving credit facilityloan with an initial borrowing base of $1.4 billion and (2)2) a senior secured term loan in aggregate subjectan original principal amount of $300 million.
On May 31, 2017, the Company entered into the First Amendment and Consent to Credit Agreement, pursuant to which among other modifications: 1) the then-effectiveterm loan was paid in full and terminated using cash proceeds from the Jonah Assets Sale, and 2) the borrowing base.base for the revolving loan was reduced to $1 billion with additional agreed upon reductions for the Company’s other announced sales. As of June 30, 2017, total borrowings outstanding under the Successor Credit Facility were approximately $183 million and there was approximately $774 million of remaining available borrowing capacity (which includes a $7 million reduction for outstanding letters of credit). The maturity date is April 2019, subject to a “springing maturity” based on the maturity of any outstanding LINN Energy junior lien debt. At June 30, 2016, the Company had approximately $1.7 billion in total borrowings outstanding (including outstanding letters of credit) under the revolving credit facility and approximately $284 million under the term loan, and there was no remaining availability.
See Note 2 for additional details on the amendment to the LINN Credit Facility entered into on April 12, 2016.February 27, 2021.
Redetermination of the borrowing base under the LINNSuccessor Credit Facility, based primarily on reserve reports using lender commodity price expectations at such time, occurs semi-annually, in April and October. The lenders under the LINN Credit Facility agreed to defer the April 2016next scheduled borrowing base redetermination is to May 11, 2016.
The Company’s obligations under the LINN Credit Facility are secured by mortgagesoccur on certain of its material subsidiaries’ oil and natural gas properties and other personal property as well as a pledge of all ownership interests in the Company’s direct and indirect material subsidiaries. The Company is required to maintain: 1) mortgages on properties representing at least 90% of the total value of oil and natural gas properties included on its most recent reserve report; 2) a minimum liquidity requirement equal to the greater of $500 million and 15% of the then effective available borrowing base after giving effect to certain redemptions or repurchases of certain debt; and 3) an EBITDA to Interest Expense ratio of at least 2.0 to 1.0 currently, 2.25 to 1.0 from March 31, 2017 through June 30, 2017 and 2.5 to 1.0 thereafter. Additionally, the obligations under the LINN Credit Facility are guaranteed by all of the Company’s material subsidiaries, other than Berry, and are required to be guaranteed by any future material subsidiaries.
October 1, 2017. At the Company’s election, interest on borrowings under the LINNSuccessor Credit Facility is determined by reference to either the London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) plus an applicable margin between 1.75% and 2.75%of 3.50% per annum (depending on the then-current level of borrowings under the LINN Credit Facility) or the alternate base rate (“ABR”) plus an applicable margin between 0.75% and 1.75%of 2.50% per annum (depending on the then-current level of borrowings under the LINN Credit Facility).annum. Interest is generally payable quarterlyin arrears monthly for loans bearing interest based onat the ABR and at the end of the applicable interest period for loans bearing interest at the LIBOR. The Company is required to pay a commitment fee to the lenders under the LINNSuccessor Credit Facility, which accrues at a rate per annum of 0.50% on the average daily unused amount of the maximum commitment amountavailable revolving loan commitments of the lenders.
Holdco II has the right to prepay any borrowings under the Successor Credit Facility at any time without a prepayment penalty, other than customary “breakage” costs with respect to LIBOR loans.
The term loan has a maturity date of April 2019, subject to a “springing maturity” based onobligations under the maturity of any outstanding LINN Energy junior lien debt, and incurs interest based on either the LIBOR plus a margin of 2.75% per annum or the ABR plus a margin of 1.75% per annum, at the Company’s election. Interest is generally payable quarterly for loans bearing interest based on the ABR and at the endSuccessor Credit Facility are secured by mortgages covering approximately 95% of the applicable interest period for loans bearing interest attotal value of the LIBOR. The term loan may be repaid atproved reserves of the optionoil and natural gas properties of the Company, without premium or penalty,and certain equipment and facilities associated therewith, along with liens on substantially all personal property of the Company and are guaranteed by the Company, Linn Energy Holdco LLC and Holdco II’s subsidiaries, subject to breakage costs. Whilecustomary exceptions. Under the term loan is outstanding,Successor Credit Facility, the Company is required to maintain either: 1) mortgages on properties representingcertain financial covenants including the maintenance of (i) a reserve coverage ratio of at least 80%1.1 to 1.0, tested on (a) the date of each scheduled borrowing base redetermination and (b) the date of each additional borrowing base redetermination done in conjunction with an asset sale, (ii) a maximum total valuenet debt to last twelve months EBITDAX ratio of 4.0 to 1.0 beginning with the quarter ending September 30, 2017, and (iii) a minimum current ratio of 1.0 to 1.0 beginning with the quarter ending September 30, 2017.
The Successor Credit Facility also contains customary affirmative and negative covenants, including as to compliance with laws (including environmental laws, ERISA and anti-corruption laws), maintenance of required insurance, delivery of quarterly and annual financial statements, oil and natural gas properties includedengineering reports and budgets, maintenance and operation of property (including oil and natural gas properties), restrictions on its most recent reserve report, or 2) a Term Loan Collateral Coverage Ratiothe incurrence of at least 2.5 to 1.0. The Term Loan Collateral Coverage Ratio is defined as the ratioliens and indebtedness, mergers, consolidations and sales of the present value of future cash flows from proved reserves from the currently mortgaged properties to the lesser of: (i) the then-effective borrowing baseassets, transactions with affiliates and (ii) theother customary covenants.

1725

Table of Contents
LINN ENERGY, LLC (DEBTOR-IN-POSSESSION)
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – Continued
(Unaudited)

maximum commitment amount and the aggregate amount of the term loan outstanding. The other terms and conditions of the LINN Credit Facility, including the financial and other restrictive covenants set forth therein, are applicable to the term loan.
Berry Credit Facility
Berry’s Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement (“Berry Credit Facility”) provides for a senior secured revolving credit facility, subject to the then-effective borrowing base. The maturity date is April 2019. At June 30, 2016, the Company had approximately $898 million in total borrowings outstanding (including outstanding letters of credit) under the Berry Credit Facility and there was no remaining availability.
See Note 2 for additional details on the amendment to the Berry Credit Facility entered into on April 12, 2016.
Redetermination of the borrowing base under the Berry Credit Facility, based primarily on reserve reports using lender commodity price expectations at such time, occurs semi-annually, in April and October. The lenders under the Berry Credit Facility agreed to defer the April 2016 borrowing base redetermination to May 11, 2016.
Berry’s obligations under the Berry Credit Facility are secured by mortgages on its oil and natural gas properties and other personal property. Berry is required to maintain: 1) mortgages on properties representing at least 90% of the present value of oil and natural gas properties included on its most recent reserve report, and 2) an EBITDAX to Interest Expense ratio of at least 2.0 to 1.0 currently, 2.25 to 1.0 from March 31, 2017 through June 30, 2017 and 2.5 to 1.0 thereafter. In accordance with the amendment described in Note 2, the lenders had agreed that the failure to maintain the EBITDAX to Interest Expense ratio would not result in a default or event of default until May 11, 2016.
At Berry’s election, interest on borrowings under the Berry Credit Facility is determined by reference to either the LIBOR plus an applicable margin between 1.75% and 2.75% per annum (depending on the then-current level of borrowings under the Berry Credit Facility) or a Base Rate (as defined in the Berry Credit Facility) plus an applicable margin between 0.75% and 1.75% per annum (depending on the then-current level of borrowings under the Berry Credit Facility). Interest is generally payable quarterly for loans bearing interest based on the Base Rate and at the end of the applicable interest period for loans bearing interest at the LIBOR. Berry is required to pay a commitment fee to the lenders under the Berry Credit Facility, which accrues at a rate per annum of 0.50% on the average daily unused amount of the maximum commitment amount of the lenders.
The Company refers to the LINN Credit Facility and the Berry Credit Facility, collectively, as the “Credit Facilities.”
The filing of the Bankruptcy Petitions constituted an event of default that accelerated the Company’s obligations under the Credit Facilities. However, under the Bankruptcy Code, the creditors under these debt agreements are stayed from taking any action against the Company as a result of the default. The automatic stay under the Bankruptcy Code does not apply to letters of credit issued under the prepetition Credit Facilities and third parties may draw on their letters of credit if the terms of a particular letter of credit so provide. During the three months and six months ended June 30, 2016, approximately $3 million in letters of credit draws were made from the Berry Credit Facility.
Senior Secured Second Lien Notes Due December 2020
On November 20, 2015, the Company issued $1.0 billion in aggregate principal amount of 12.00% senior secured second lien notes due December 2020 (“Second Lien Notes”) in exchange for approximately $2.0 billion in aggregate principal amount of certain of its outstanding senior notes. The exchanges were accounted for as a troubled debt restructuring (“TDR”). TDR accounting requires that interest payments on the Second Lien Notes reduce the carrying value of the debt with no interest expense recognized.
In connection with the issuance of the Second Lien Notes, the Company entered into a Registration Rights Agreement with each of the holders (collectively, the “Registration Rights Agreements”). Under the Registration Rights Agreements, the Company agreed to use its reasonable efforts to file with the SEC and cause to become effective a registration statement relating to an offer to issue new notes having terms substantially identical to the Second Lien Notes in exchange for outstanding Second Lien Notes within 370 days following the issuance of the Second Lien Notes. In certain circumstances, the Company may be required to file a shelf registration statement to cover resales of the Second Lien Notes. The Company will be obligated

18

Table of Contents
LINN ENERGY, LLC (DEBTOR-IN-POSSESSION)
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – Continued
(Unaudited)

to file one or more registration statements as described above only if the restrictive legend on the Second Lien Notes has not been removed and the Second Lien Notes are not freely tradable pursuant to Rule 144 under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, as of the 370th day following the issuance of the Second Lien Notes. If the Company fails to satisfy these obligations, the Company may be required to pay additional interest to holders of the Second Lien Notes under certain circumstances.
Repurchases of Senior Notes
The Company made no repurchases of its senior notes during the six months ended June 30, 2016. During the six months ended June 30, 2015, the Company repurchased on the open market approximately $184 million of its outstanding senior notes as follows:
8.625% senior notes due April 2020 – $127 million;
6.75% Berry senior notes due November 2020 – $25 million;
7.75% senior notes due February 2021 – $6 million; and
6.375% Berry senior notes due September 2022 – $26 million.
In connection with the repurchases, the Company recorded a gain on extinguishment of debt of approximately $16 million for the six months ended June 30, 2015.
Notes Covenants
The Second Lien Indenture contains covenants that, among other things, limit the Company’s ability and the ability of the Company’s restricted subsidiaries to: (i) declare or pay distributions on, purchase or redeem the Company’s units or purchase or redeem the Company’s or its restricted subsidiaries’ indebtedness secured by liens junior in priority to liens securing the Second Lien Notes, unsecured indebtedness or subordinated indebtedness; (ii) make investments; (iii) incur or guarantee additional indebtedness or issue certain types of equity securities; (iv) create certain liens; (v) sell assets; (vi) consolidate, merge or transfer all or substantially all of the Company’s assets; (vii) enter into agreements that restrict distributions or other payments from the Company’s restricted subsidiaries to the Company; (viii) engage in transactions with affiliates; and (ix) create unrestricted subsidiaries.
The Company’s senior notes contain covenants that, among other things, may limit its ability to: (i) pay distributions on, purchase or redeem the Company’s units or redeem its subordinated debt; (ii) make investments; (iii) incur or guarantee additional indebtedness or issue certain types of equity securities; (iv) create certain liens; (v) sell assets; (vi) consolidate, merge or transfer all or substantially all of the Company’s assets; (vii) enter into agreements that restrict distributions or other payments from the Company’s restricted subsidiaries to the Company; (viii) engage in transactions with affiliates; and (ix) create unrestricted subsidiaries.
Berry’s senior notes contain covenants that, among other things, may limit its ability to: (i) incur or guarantee additional indebtedness; (ii) pay distributions or dividends on Berry’s equity or redeem its subordinated debt; (iii) create certain liens; (iv) enter into agreements that restrict distributions or other payments from Berry’s restricted subsidiaries to Berry; (v) sell assets; (vi) engage in transactions with affiliates; and (vii) consolidate, merge or transfer all or substantially all of Berry’s assets.
In addition, any cash generated by Berry is currently being used by Berry to fund its activities. To the extent that Berry generates cash in excess of its needs and determines to distribute such amounts to LINN Energy, the indentures governing Berry’s senior notes limit the amount it may distribute to LINN Energy to the amount available under a “restricted payments basket,” and Berry may not distribute any such amounts unless it is permitted by the indentures to incur additional debt pursuant to the consolidated coverage ratio test set forth in the Berry indentures. Berry’s restricted payments basket may be increased in accordance with the terms of the Berry indentures by, among other things, 50% of Berry’s future net income, reductions in its indebtedness and restricted investments, and future capital contributions.

19

Table of Contents
LINN ENERGY, LLC (DEBTOR-IN-POSSESSION)INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – Continued
(Unaudited)

The filing of the Bankruptcy Petitions constituted an eventSuccessor Credit Facility contains customary events of default that acceleratedand remedies for credit facilities of this nature. Failure to comply with the Company’s obligationsfinancial and other covenants in the Successor Credit Facility would allow the lenders, subject to customary cure rights, to require immediate payment of all amounts outstanding under the Second Lien Indenture and the senior notes. However, under the Bankruptcy Code, holders of theSuccessor Credit Facility.
Predecessor’s Credit Facility, Second Lien Notes and Senior Notes
On the Effective Date, pursuant to the terms of the Plan, all outstanding obligations under the Predecessor’s credit facility, Second Lien Notes and senior notes are stayed from taking any action against the Company as a result of the default.were canceled. See Note 2 for additional information.
Predecessor Covenant Violations
The Company’s filing of the Bankruptcy Petitions described in Note 2 constituted an event of default that accelerated the Company’s obligations under its Credit Facilities, itsthe Predecessor’s credit facility, Second Lien Notes and its senior notes. Additionally, other events of default, including cross-defaults, are present, includingFor the failure to maketwo months ended February 28, 2017, contractual interest, paymentswhich was not recorded, on the Company’s Second Lien Notes and certain of its senior notes as well as the receipt of a going concern explanatory paragraph from the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm on the Company’s consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2015.was approximately $57 million. Under the Bankruptcy Code, the creditors under these debt agreements arewere stayed from taking any action against the Company as a result of an event of default.
Note 7 – Derivatives
Commodity Derivatives
Historically, the Company has hedged a portion of its forecasted production to reduce exposure to fluctuations in oil and natural gas prices and provide long-term cash flow predictability to manage its business, service debt and, if and when resumed, pay distributions.business. The current direct NGL hedging market is constrained in terms of price, volume, duration and number of counterparties, which limits the Company’s ability to effectively hedge its NGL production. The Company has also hedged its exposure to natural gas differentials in certain operating areas but does not currently hedge exposure to oil or natural gas differentials.
The Company has historically entered into commodity hedging transactions primarily in the form of swap contracts that are designed to provide a fixed price, collars and, from time to time, put options that are designed to provide a fixed price floor with the opportunity for upside. The Company enters into these transactions with respect to a portion of its projected production or consumption to provide an economic hedge of the risk related to the future commodity prices received or paid. The Company does not enter into derivative contracts for trading purposes. The Company did not designate any of its contracts as cash flow hedges; therefore, the changes in fair value of these instruments are recorded in current earnings. See Note 8 for fair value disclosures about oil and natural gas commodity derivatives.
The following table presents derivative positions for the periodperiods indicated as of June 30, 2016:2017:
 July 1 - December 31, 2016
Natural gas basis differential positions: (1)
 
SoCal basis swaps: (2)
 
Hedged volume (MMMBtu)1,840
Hedged differential ($/MMBtu)$(0.03)
(1)
Settle on the respective pricing index to hedge basis differential to the NYMEX Henry Hub natural gas price.
(2)
For positions which hedge exposure to differentials in consuming areas, the Company pays the NYMEX Henry Hub natural gas price plus the respective spread and receives the specified index price. Cash settlements are made on a net basis.
The Company did not enter into any commodity derivative contracts during the six months ended June 30, 2016. During the six months ended June 30, 2015, the Company entered into commodity derivative contracts consisting of natural gas basis swaps for May 2015 through December 2017 to hedge exposure to differentials in certain producing areas and oil swaps for April 2015 through December 2015. In addition, the Company entered into natural gas basis swaps for May 2015 through December 2016 to hedge exposure to the differential in California, where it consumes natural gas in its heavy oil development operations.
 
July 1  December 31, 2017
 2018 2019
Natural gas positions:     
Fixed price swaps (NYMEX Henry Hub):     
Hedged volume (MMMBtu)68,080
 47,815
 11,315
Average price ($/MMBtu)$3.17
 $3.01
 $2.97
Oil positions:     
Fixed price swaps (NYMEX WTI):     
Hedged volume (MBbls)2,208
 548
 
Average price ($/Bbl)$52.13
 $54.07
 $
Collars (NYMEX WTI):     
Hedged volume (MBbls)
 1,825
 1,825
Average floor price ($/Bbl)$
 $50.00
 $50.00
Average ceiling price ($/Bbl)$
 $55.50
 $55.50

2026

Table of Contents
LINN ENERGY, LLC (DEBTOR-IN-POSSESSION)INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – Continued
(Unaudited)

In April 2016 and May 2016, in connection withDuring the Company’s restructuring efforts, LINN Energy canceled (prior tofour months ended June 30, 2017, the contract settlement dates) all of itsCompany entered into commodity derivative contracts consisting of oil swaps for net proceeds of approximately $1.2 billion.January 2018 through December 2018 and natural gas swaps for January 2018 through December 2019. The net proceeds were used to make permanent repayments of a portion of the borrowings outstanding under the LINN Credit Facility. Also, in May 2016, as a result of the Chapter 11 proceedings, Berry’s counterparties canceled (prior to the contract settlement dates) all of Berry’sCompany did not enter into any commodity derivative contracts (withduring the exception of a contract consisting of 1,840 MMMBtu of natural gas basis swaps for 2016) for net proceeds of approximately $2 million. The net proceeds were used to make permanent repayments of a portion oftwo months ended February 28, 2017, or the borrowings outstanding under the Berry Credit Facility. In July 2016, Berry’s remaining derivative contract was canceled by the counterparty.
Settled derivatives on natural gas production for the three months and six months ended June 30, 2016, included volumes of 28,477 MMMBtu and 77,734 MMMBtu, respectively, at average contract prices of $4.49 per MMBtu and $4.50 per MMBtu. Settled derivatives on oil production for the three months and six months ended June 30, 2016, included volumes of 667 MBbls and 4,331 MBbls, respectively, at average contract prices of $90.48 per Bbl and $90.44 per Bbl. Settled derivatives on natural gas production for the three months and six months ended June 30, 2015, included volumes of 47,344 MMMBtu and 94,167 MMMBtu, respectively, at an average contract price of $5.12 per MMBtu. Settled derivatives on oil production for the three months and six months ended June 30, 2015, included volumes of 4,820 MBbls and 8,795 MBbls, respectively, at average contract prices of $88.60 per Bbl and $91.20 per Bbl.2016.
The natural gas derivatives are settled based on the closing price of NYMEX Henry Hub natural gas on the last trading day for the delivery month, which occurs on the third business day preceding the delivery month, or the relevant index prices of natural gas published in Inside FERC’s Gas Market Report on the first business day of the delivery month. The oil derivatives are settled based on the average closing price of NYMEX WTI crude oil for each day of the delivery month.
Balance Sheet Presentation
The Company’s commodity derivatives are presented on a net basis in “derivative instruments” on the condensed consolidated balance sheets. The following table summarizes the fair value of derivatives outstanding on a gross basis:
June 30, 2016 
December 31,
2015
Successor  Predecessor
(in thousands)June 30, 2017  December 31, 2016
(in thousands)    
Assets:       
Commodity derivatives$200
 $1,812,375
$55,058
  $19,369
Liabilities:       
Commodity derivatives$1,709
 $28,842
$18,826
  $113,226
By using derivative instruments to economically hedge exposures to changes in commodity prices, the Company exposes itself to credit risk and market risk. Credit risk is the failure of the counterparty to perform under the terms of the derivative contract. When the fair value of a derivative contract is positive, the counterparty owes the Company, which creates credit risk. The Company’s counterparties are participants in the Successor Credit Facility or were participants in the Predecessor Credit Facility. The Successor Credit Facility is secured by certain of the Company’s and its subsidiaries’ oil, natural gas and NGL reserves and personal property; therefore, the Company minimizedis not required to post any collateral. The Company does not receive collateral from its counterparties.
The maximum amount of loss due to credit risk that the Company would incur if its counterparties failed completely to perform according to the terms of the contracts, based on the gross fair value of financial instruments, was approximately $55 million at June 30, 2017. The Company minimizes the credit risk in derivative instruments by: (i) limiting its exposure to any single counterparty; (ii) entering into derivative instruments only with counterparties that meet the Company’s minimum credit quality standard, or have a guarantee from an affiliate that meets the Company’s minimum credit quality standard; and (iii) monitoring the creditworthiness of the Company’s counterparties on an ongoing basis. In accordance with the Company’s standard practice, its commodity derivatives are subject to counterparty netting under agreements governing such derivatives and therefore the risk of loss due to counterparty nonperformance is somewhat mitigated.
Gains and Losses on Derivatives
Gains on derivatives were approximately $46 million and $34 million for the three months and four months ended June 30, 2017, respectively, and approximately $93 million for the two months ended February 28, 2017. Losses on derivatives were approximately $184 million and $74 million for the three months and six months ended June 30, 2016, respectively. Gains and losses on derivatives are reported on the condensed consolidated statements of operations in “gains (losses) on oil and natural gas derivatives.”
The Company received net cash settlements of approximately $2 million and $8 million for the three months and four months ended June 30, 2017, respectively, and paid net cash settlements of approximately $12 million for the two months ended

2127

Table of Contents
LINN ENERGY, LLC (DEBTOR-IN-POSSESSION)INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – Continued
(Unaudited)

Gains (Losses) on Derivatives
A summary of gains and losses on derivatives included on the condensed consolidated statements of operations is presented below:
 Three Months Ended
June 30,
 Six Months Ended
June 30,
 2016 2015 2016 2015
 (in thousands)
        
Gains (losses) on oil and natural gas derivatives$(182,768) $(191,188) $(72,807) $233,593
Lease operating expenses (1)
(1,037) 3,986
 (4,405) 3,060
Total gains (losses) on oil and natural gas derivatives$(183,805) $(187,202) $(77,212) $236,653
(1)
Consists of gains and (losses) on derivatives entered into in March 2015 to hedge exposure to differentials in consuming areas.
For the three months and six months ended June 30, 2016, theFebruary 28, 2017. The Company received net cash settlements of approximately $523$522 million and $867$856 million respectively. In addition, for the three months and six months ended June 30, 2016, approximately $841 million in settlements (primarily in connection with the April 2016 and May 2016 commodity derivative cancellations) were sent directly from the counterparties to the lenders under the LINN Credit Facility as repayments of a portion of the borrowings outstanding. For the three months and six months ended June 30, 2015, the Company received net cash settlements of approximately $284 million and $566 million, respectively.
Note 8 – Fair Value Measurements on a Recurring Basis
The Company accounts for its commodity derivatives at fair value (see Note 7) on a recurring basis. The Company determines the fair value of its oil and natural gas derivatives utilizing pricing models that use a variety of techniques, including market quotes and pricing analysis. Inputs to the pricing models include publicly available prices and forward price curves generated from a compilation of data gathered from third parties. Company management validates the data provided by third parties by understanding the pricing models used, obtaining market values from other pricing sources, analyzing pricing data in certain situations and confirming that those instruments trade in active markets. Assumed credit risk adjustments, based on published credit ratings and public bond yield spreads and credit default swap spreads, are applied to the Company’s commodity derivatives.
Fair Value Hierarchy
In accordance with applicable accounting standards, the Company has categorized its financial instruments into a three-level fair value hierarchy based on the priority of inputs to the valuation technique, into a three-level fair value hierarchy.technique. The fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority to quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3).
The following presents the fair value hierarchy for assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis:
 June 30, 2016
 Level 2 
Netting (1)
 Total
 (in thousands)
Assets:     
Commodity derivatives$200
 $(15) $185
Liabilities:     
Commodity derivatives$1,709
 $(15) $1,694

22

Table of Contents
LINN ENERGY, LLC (DEBTOR-IN-POSSESSION)
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – Continued
(Unaudited)

 Successor
 June 30, 2017
 Level 2 
Netting (1)
 Total
 (in thousands)
Assets:     
Commodity derivatives$55,058
 $(18,340) $36,718
Liabilities:     
Commodity derivatives$18,826
 $(18,340) $486
Predecessor
December 31, 2015December 31, 2016
Level 2 
Netting (1)
 TotalLevel 2 
Netting (1)
 Total
(in thousands)(in thousands)
Assets:          
Commodity derivatives$1,812,375
 $(25,744) $1,786,631
$19,369
 $(19,369) $
Liabilities:          
Commodity derivatives$28,842
 $(25,744) $3,098
$113,226
 $(19,369) $93,857
(1) 
Represents counterparty netting under agreements governing such derivatives.
Note 9 – Asset Retirement Obligations
The Company has the obligation to plug and abandon oil and natural gas wells and related equipment at the end of production operations. Estimated asset retirement costs are recognized as liabilities with an increase to the carrying amounts of the related long-lived assets when the obligation is incurred. The liabilities are included in “other accrued liabilities” and “other noncurrent liabilities” on the condensed consolidated balance sheets. Accretion expense is included in “depreciation, depletion and amortization” on the condensed consolidated statements of operations. The fair value of additions to the asset retirement obligations is estimated using valuation techniques that convert future cash flows to a single discounted amount. Significant

28

Table of Contents
LINN ENERGY, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – Continued
(Unaudited)

inputs to the valuation include estimates of: (i) plug and abandon costs per well based on existing regulatory requirements; (ii) remaining life per well; (iii) future inflation factors; and (iv) a credit-adjusted risk-free interest rate. These inputs require significant judgments and estimates by the Company’s management at the time of the valuation and are the most sensitive and subject to change.
The following table presents a reconciliation of the Company’s asset retirement obligations (in thousands):
Asset retirement obligations at December 31, 2015$523,541
Liabilities added from drilling352
Current year accretion expense15,369
Settlements(5,542)
Asset retirement obligations at June 30, 2016$533,720
Asset retirement obligations at December 31, 2016 (Predecessor)$402,162
Liabilities added from drilling146
Accretion expense4,024
Settlements(618)
Asset retirement obligations at February 28, 2017 (Predecessor)$405,714
Fresh start adjustment (1)
(48,317)
Asset retirement obligations at February 28, 2017 (Successor)$357,397
Liabilities added from drilling277
Liabilities associated with assets sold(43,507)
Liabilities associated with assets held for sale(21,210)
Liabilities associated with discontinued operations(26,774)
Accretion expense7,107
Settlements(3,172)
Asset retirement obligations at June 30, 2017 (Successor)$270,118

(1)
As a result of the application of fresh start accounting, the Successor recorded its asset retirement obligations at fair value as of the Effective Date.
Note 10 – Commitments and Contingencies
On May 11, 2016, the Debtors filed Bankruptcy Petitions for relief under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code in the Bankruptcy Court. The Debtors’ Chapter 11 cases were administered jointly under the caption In re Linn Energy, LLC, et al., Case No. 16‑60040. On January 27, 2017, the Bankruptcy Court entered the Confirmation Order. Consummation of the Plan was subject to certain conditions set forth in the Plan. On the Effective Date, all of the conditions were satisfied or waived and the Plan became effective and was implemented in accordance with its terms. The LINN Debtors Chapter 11 cases will remain pending until the final resolution of all outstanding claims.
The commencement of the Chapter 11 proceedings automatically stayed certain actions against the Company, including actions to collect prepetition liabilities or to exercise control over the property of the Company’s bankruptcy estates. For certain statewide class action royalty payment disputes, the Company filed notices advising that it had filed for bankruptcy protection and seeking a stay, which was granted. In addition,However, the Company is, involved in various other disputes arisingand will continue to be until the final resolution of all claims, subject to certain contested matters and adversary proceedings stemming from the Chapter 11 proceedings.
In March 2017, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association (“Wells Fargo”), the administrative agent under the Predecessor Credit Facility, filed a motion in the ordinary courseBankruptcy Court seeking payment of business. post-petition default interest of approximately $31 million. The Company has vigorously disputed that Wells Fargo is entitled to any default interest based on the plain language of the Plan and Confirmation Order. A hearing was held on April 27, 2017, and the parties are awaiting a ruling from the Bankruptcy Court on this matter.
The Company is not currently a party to any litigation or pending claims that it believes would have a material adverse effect on its overall business, financial position, results of operations or liquidity; however, cash flow could be significantly impacted in the reporting periods in which such matters are resolved.

29

LINN ENERGY, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – Continued
(Unaudited)

During the six months ended June 30, 2016,2017, and the six months ended June 30, 2015,2016, the Company made no significant payments to settle any legal, environmental or tax proceedings. The Company regularly analyzes current information and accrues for probable liabilities on the disposition of certain matters as necessary. Liabilities for loss contingencies arising from claims, assessments, litigation or other sources are recorded when it is probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount can be reasonably estimated.
The commencement
Note 11 – Equity (Deficit)
Cancellation of Units and Issuance of Class A Common Stock
In accordance with the Plan, on the Effective Date:
All units in the Predecessor that were issued and outstanding immediately prior to the Effective Date were extinguished without recovery;
17,678,889 shares of Class A common stock were issued pro rata to holders of the Chapter 11 proceedings automatically stayed certain actions againstSecond Lien Notes with claims allowed under the Plan;
26,724,396 shares of Class A common stock were issued pro rata to holders of Unsecured Notes with claims allowed under the Plan;
471,110 shares of Class A common stock were issued to commitment parties under the Backstop Commitment Agreement in respect of premium due thereunder;
2,995,691 shares of Class A common stock were issued to commitment parties under the Backstop Commitment Agreement in connection with their backstop obligation thereunder; and
41,359,806 shares of Class A common stock were issued to participants in the rights offerings extended by the Company including actions to collect prepetition liabilities orcertain holders of claims arising under the Second Lien Notes and the Unsecured Notes (including, in each case, certain of the commitment parties party to exercise control over the propertyBackstop Commitment Agreement).
With the exception of shares of Class A common stock issued to commitment parties pursuant to their obligations under the Backstop Commitment Agreement, shares of Class A common stock were issued under the Plan pursuant to an exemption from the registration requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), under Section 1145 of the Bankruptcy Code. Shares of Class A common stock issued to commitment parties pursuant to their obligations under the Backstop Commitment Agreement were issued pursuant to an exemption from the registration requirements of the Securities Act provided by Section 4(a)(2) thereof.
As of the Effective Date, there were 89,229,892 shares of Class A common stock, par value $0.001 per share, issued and outstanding.
Share Repurchase Program
On June 1, 2017, the Company’s Board of Directors announced that it had authorized the repurchase of up to $75 million of the Company’s bankruptcy estates. The Company intends to seek authority to pay all general claimsoutstanding shares of Class A common stock. On June 28, 2017, the Company’s Board of Directors announced that it had authorized an increase in the ordinary coursepreviously announced share repurchase program to up to a total of business notwithstanding the commencement$200 million of the Chapter 11 proceedingsCompany’s outstanding shares of Class A common stock. In June 2017, the Company repurchased 7,540 shares of Class A common stock at an average price of $30.48 per share for a total cost of approximately $230,000.
In addition, in July 2017, the Company repurchased 833,763 shares of Class A common stock at an average price of $32.43 per share for a manner consistent withtotal cost of approximately $27 million.

30

LINN ENERGY, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – Continued
(Unaudited)

Dividends/Distributions
Under the Restructuring Support Agreement. The Plan inPredecessor’s limited liability company agreement, unitholders were entitled to receive a distribution of available cash, which included cash on hand plus borrowings less any reserves established by the Chapter 11 proceedings, if confirmed, willPredecessor’s Board of Directors to provide for the treatmentproper conduct of claimsthe Predecessor’s business (including reserves for future capital expenditures, acquisitions and anticipated future credit needs) or to fund distributions, if any, over the next four quarters. In October 2015, the Predecessor’s Board of Directors determined to suspend payment of the Predecessor’s distribution. The Successor currently has no intention of paying cash dividends and any future payment of cash dividends would be subject to the restrictions in the Successor Credit Facility.
Note 12 – Share-Based Compensation
The Company had no equity awards outstanding as of December 31, 2016. In accordance with the Plan, in February 2017, the Company implemented the Linn Energy, Inc. 2017 Omnibus Incentive Plan (the “Omnibus Incentive Plan”) pursuant to which employees and consultants of the Company and its affiliates are eligible to receive stock options, restricted stock, performance awards, other stock-based awards and other cash-based awards.
The Committee (as defined in the Omnibus Incentive Plan) has broad authority under the Omnibus Incentive Plan to, among other things: (i) select participants; (ii) determine the types of awards that participants receive and the number of shares that are subject to such awards; and (iii) establish the terms and conditions of awards, including the price (if any) to be paid for the shares or the award. As of the Effective Date, an aggregate of 6,444,381 shares of Class A common stock were reserved for issuance under the Omnibus Incentive Plan (the “Share Reserve”). Additional shares of Class A common stock may be issued in excess of the Share Reserve for the sole purpose of satisfying any conversion of Class B units or Class A‑2 units of Holdco, as applicable, into shares of Class A common stock pursuant to the Limited Liability Company Operating Agreement of Holdco (the “Holdco LLC Agreement”), and the conversion procedures set forth therein. If any stock option or other stock-based award granted under the Omnibus Incentive Plan expires, terminates or is canceled for any reason without having been exercised in full, the number of shares of Class A common stock underlying any unexercised award shall again be available for the purpose of awards under the Omnibus Incentive Plan. If any shares of restricted stock, performance awards or other stock-based awards denominated in shares of Class A common stock awarded under the Omnibus Incentive Plan are forfeited for any reason, the number of forfeited shares shall again be available for purposes of awards under the Omnibus Incentive Plan. Any award under the Omnibus Incentive Plan settled in cash shall not be counted against the maximum share limitation.
As is customary in incentive plans of this nature, each share limit and the number and kind of shares available under the Omnibus Incentive Plan and any outstanding awards, as well as the exercise or purchase prices of awards, and performance targets under certain types of performance-based awards, are subject to adjustment in the event of certain reorganizations, mergers, combinations, recapitalizations, stock splits, stock dividends or other similar events that change the number or kind of shares outstanding, and extraordinary dividends or distributions of property to the Company’s bankruptcy estates, including prepetition liabilitiesstockholders.
Restricted Stock Units
On the Effective Date, the Company granted to certain employees 2,478,606 restricted stock units (the “Emergence Awards”). The portion of the Share Reserve that havedoes not otherwise been satisfied constitute the Emergence Awards, plus any subsequent awards forfeited before vesting (the “Remaining Share Reserve”), will be fully granted within the 36-month period immediately following the Effective Date (with such 36-month anniversary, the “Final Allocation Date”). If a Change in Control (as defined in the Omnibus Incentive Plan) occurs before the Final Allocation Date, the Company will allocate the entire Remaining Share Reserve on a fully-vested basis to actively employed employees (pro-rata based upon each such employee’s relative awards) upon the consummation of the Change in Control. During the four months ended June 30, 2017, the Company granted to certain employees 1,255,345 restricted stock units from the Remaining Share Reserve.
Upon a participant’s termination of employment and/or addressed duringservice (as applicable), the Chapter 11 proceedings. See Note 2 for additional information.Company has the right (but not the obligation) to repurchase all or any portion of the shares of Class A common stock acquired pursuant to an award at a price equal to the fair market value (as determined under the Omnibus Incentive Plan) of the shares of Class A common stock to be repurchased, measured as of the date of the Company’s repurchase notice.

2331

LINN ENERGY, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – Continued
(Unaudited)

Holdco Incentive Interest Plan
On the Effective Date, Holdco granted incentive interest awards to certain members of its management in the form of 3,470,051 Class B units, which are intended to qualify as “profits interests” for U.S. income tax purposes. The Class B units vested 25% on the Effective Date and the remaining amount vest ratably over the following three years, subject to meeting a performance condition described in the agreements. Each Class B unit represents a non-voting equity interest in Holdco that entitles the holder to Holdco distributions, after an applicable hurdle amount is met, such that each Class B unit only participates in Holdco’s increase in value following the grant date. In accordance with the Holdco LLC Agreement, the requirements entitling Class B unitholders to Holdco distributions had not been met as of June 30, 2017. Class B units can be converted at any time by the holder to Class A-2 units of Holdco or Class A common stock of the Company in accordance with the terms of the Holdco LLC Agreement.
Accounting for Share-Based Compensation
The Company recognizes expense for share-based compensation over the requisite service period in an amount equal to the fair value of share-based awards granted. The fair value of share-based awards, excluding liability awards, is computed at the date of grant and is not remeasured. The fair value of liability awards is remeasured at each reporting date through the settlement date with the change in fair value recognized as compensation expense over that period. The Company has made a policy decision to recognize compensation expense for service-based awards on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period for the entire award. Beginning in 2017, the Company accounts for forfeitures as they occur.
The Company’s restricted stock units are equity-classified and its incentive interest awards in the form of Class B units are liability-classified on the condensed consolidated balance sheet. The fair value of the Company’s restricted stock units was determined based on the fair value of the Company’s shares on the date of grant and the fair value of the incentive interest awards in the form of Class B units was determined based on the estimated amount to settle the awards.
Share-Based Compensation Expenses
A summary of share-based compensation expenses included on the condensed consolidated statements of operations is presented below:
 Successor  Predecessor
 Three Months Ended June 30, 2017  Three Months Ended June 30, 2016
(in thousands)    
General and administrative expenses$15,422
  $4,946
Lease operating expenses
  1,182
Total share-based compensation expenses$15,422
  $6,128
Income tax benefit$3,128
  $2,264

 Successor  Predecessor
 Four Months Ended June 30, 2017  Two Months Ended February 28, 2017 Six Months Ended June 30, 2016
(in thousands)      
General and administrative expenses$19,599
  $50,255
 $14,406
Lease operating expenses
  
 4,147
Total share-based compensation expenses$19,599
  $50,255
 $18,553
Income tax benefit$3,555
  $5,170
 $6,855

32

LINN ENERGY, LLC (DEBTOR-IN-POSSESSION)INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – Continued
(Unaudited)

Note 1113 – Earnings Per Share/Unit
Basic earnings per share/unit is computed by dividing net earnings attributable to stockholders/unitholders by the weighted average number of shares/units outstanding during eachthe period. Diluted earnings per share/unit is computed by adjusting the average number of shares/units outstanding for the dilutive effect, if any, of unit equivalents.potential common shares/units. The Company uses the treasury stock method to determine the dilutive effect.effect of restricted stock units and the if-converted method to determine the dilutive effect of Class B units.
The following table providestables provide a reconciliation of the numerators and denominators of the basic and diluted per share/unit computations for net income (loss):
 
Three Months Ended
June 30,
 
Six Months Ended
June 30,
 2016 2015 2016 2015
 (in thousands, except per unit data)
        
Net income (loss)$208,492
 $(379,127) $(1,139,254) $(718,287)
Allocated to participating securities(1,617) (1,662) 
 (3,273)
 $206,875
 $(380,789) $(1,139,254) $(721,560)
        
Basic net income (loss) per unit$0.59
 $(1.12) $(3.23) $(2.15)
Diluted net income (loss) per unit$0.59
 $(1.12) $(3.23) $(2.15)
        
Basic weighted average units outstanding352,789
 340,934
 352,511
 335,817
Dilutive effect of unit equivalents
 
 
 
Diluted weighted average units outstanding352,789
 340,934
 352,511
 335,817
 Successor  Predecessor
 Three Months Ended June 30, 2017  Three Months Ended June 30, 2016
(in thousands, except per share/unit data)    
Income from continuing operations$223,379
  $204,691
Allocated to participating securities
  (1,617)
 223,379
  203,074
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of income taxes(3,322)  3,801
 $220,057
  $206,875
     
Weighted average shares/units outstanding – Basic
89,849
  352,789
Dilutive effect of restricted stock units635
  
Weighted average shares/units outstanding – Diluted
90,484
  352,789
     
Income from continuing operations per share/unit – Basic
$2.49
  $0.58
Income from continuing operations per share/unit – Diluted
$2.47
  $0.58
     
Income (loss) from discontinued operations per share/unit – Basic
$(0.04)  $0.01
Income (loss) from discontinued operations per share/unit – Diluted
$(0.04)  $0.01
     
Net income per share/unit – Basic
$2.45
  $0.59
Net income per share/unit – Diluted
$2.43
  $0.59
Basic
33

LINN ENERGY, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – Continued
(Unaudited)

 Successor  Predecessor
 Four Months Ended June 30, 2017  Two Months Ended February 28, 2017 Six Months Ended June 30, 2016
(in thousands, except per share/unit data)      
Income (loss) from continuing operations$216,055
  $2,397,609
 $(9,177)
Allocated to participating securities
  
 
 216,055
  2,397,609
 (9,177)
Loss from discontinued operations, net of income taxes(3,254)  (548) (1,130,077)
 $212,801
  $2,397,061
 $(1,139,254)
       
Weighted average shares/units outstanding – Basic
89,849
  352,792
 352,511
Dilutive effect of restricted stock units216
  
 
Weighted average shares/units outstanding – Diluted
90,065
  352,792
 352,511
       
Income (loss) from continuing operations per share/unit – Basic
$2.41
  $6.80
 $(0.02)
Income (loss) from continuing operations per share/unit – Diluted
$2.40
  $6.80
 $(0.02)
       
Loss from discontinued operations per share/unit – Basic
$(0.04)  $(0.01) $(3.21)
Loss from discontinued operations per share/unit – Diluted
$(0.04)  $(0.01) $(3.21)
       
Net income (loss) per share/unit – Basic
$2.37
  $6.79
 $(3.23)
Net income (loss) per share/unit – Diluted
$2.36
  $6.79
 $(3.23)
The 3,470,051 Class B units outstandingassociated with management’s profits interests awards were not considered to be dilutive as the applicable hurdle rate had not been met as of June 30, 2017, and, therefore, are excluded for the purpose of the diluted earnings per share calculation. The diluted earnings per unit calculation excludes the effect of weighted average anti-dilutive unit equivalents related to approximately 1 million unit options and warrants that were anti-dilutive for botheach of the three months and six months ended June 30, 2016, and approximately 5 million unit options and warrants for both2016. There were no potential common units outstanding during the three months and sixtwo months ended June 30, 2015. All equivalent units were antidilutive for both the three months and six months ended June 30, 2016, and June 30, 2015.February 28, 2017.
Note 1214 – Income Taxes
The Company isEffective February 28, 2017, upon consummation of the Plan, the Successor became a C corporation subject to federal and state income taxes. Prior to the consummation of the Plan, the Predecessor was a limited liability company treated as a partnership for federal and state income tax purposes, with the exception of the state of Texas, in which income tax liabilities and/or benefits areof the Company were passed through to its unitholders. Limited liability companies are subject to Texas margin tax. In addition, certain of the Company’sPredecessor’s subsidiaries are Subchapter C-corporationswere C corporations subject to federal and state income taxes. As such, with the exception of the state of Texas and certain subsidiaries, the Company is not a taxable entity, it doesPredecessor did not directly pay federal and state income taxes and recognition haswas not been given to federal and state income taxes for the operations of the Company.Predecessor.
The effective income tax rates were approximately 42% for each of the three months and four months ended June 30, 2017, and zero for the two months ended February 28, 2017. The deferred tax effects of the Company’s change to a C corporation are included in income from continuing operations for the two months ended February 28, 2017. Amounts recognized foras income taxes are reportedincluded in “income tax expense (benefit), as well as discontinued operations, on the condensed consolidated statements of operations.

2434

LINN ENERGY, LLC (DEBTOR-IN-POSSESSION)INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – Continued
(Unaudited)

Note 1315 – Supplemental Disclosures to the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets and Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
“Other current assets” reported on the condensed consolidated balance sheets include the following:
 Successor  Predecessor
 June 30, 2017  December 31, 2016
(in thousands)    
Prepaid expenses$58,095
  $70,116
Inventories10,984
  15,097
Deferred financing fees
  16,809
Other2,757
  3,288
Other current assets$71,836
  $105,310
“Other accrued liabilities” reported on the condensed consolidated balance sheets include the following:
 Successor  Predecessor
 June 30, 2017  December 31, 2016
(in thousands)    
Accrued compensation$21,214
  $16,443
Share-based payment liability18,517
  
Asset retirement obligations (current portion)8,120
  9,361
Deposits for pending divestitures60,112
  
Other27,453
  175
Other accrued liabilities$135,416
  $25,979
Supplemental disclosures to the condensed consolidated statements of cash flows are presented below:
Six Months Ended
June 30,
Successor  Predecessor
2016 2015Four Months Ended June 30, 2017  Two Months Ended February 28, 2017 Six Months Ended June 30, 2016
(in thousands)
   
(in thousands)      
Cash payments for interest, net of amounts capitalized$126,499
 $280,018
$14,436
  $17,651
 $92,192
Cash payments for income taxes$3,033
 $601
$215
  $
 $3,033
Cash payments for reorganization items, net$6,300
  $21,571
 $
         
Noncash investing activities:         
Accrued capital expenditures$23,212
 $105,115
$34,547
  $22,191
 $20,124
For purposes of the condensed consolidated statements of cash flows, the Company considers all highly liquid short-term investments with original maturities of three months or less to be cash equivalents. At June 30, 2016, and December 31, 2015,2017, “restricted cash” on the condensed consolidated balance sheets includessheet consists of approximately $197$42 million that will be used to settle certain claims and $250pay certain professional fees in accordance with the Plan (which is the remainder of approximately $80 million respectively,transferred to restricted cash in February 2017 to fund such items) and approximately $57 million related to deposits for pending divestitures. At December 31, 2016, “restricted cash” on the $250 million that condensed consolidated balance sheet represents amounts restricted related to

35

Table of Contents
LINN Energy borrowed under the LINN Credit Facility and contributed to Berry in May 2015 to post with Berry’s lenders in connection with the reduction in the Berry Credit Facility’s borrowing base, as well as associated interest income. RestrictedENERGY, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – Continued
(Unaudited)

utility services providers. In addition, restricted cash also includesof approximately $8 million and $7 millionis included in “other noncurrent assets” on the condensed consolidated balance sheet at June 30,December 31, 2016, and December 31, 2015, respectively, ofrepresents cash deposited by the Company into a separate account designated for asset retirement obligations in accordance with contractual agreements.
During the three months and six months ended June 30, 2016, approximately $841 million in commodity derivative settlements (primarily in connection with the April 2016 and May 2016 commodity derivative cancellations) were paid directly by the counterparties to the lenders under the LINN Credit Facility as repayments of a portion of the borrowings outstanding, and are reflected as noncash transactions by the Company. In addition, during the three months and six months ended June 30, 2016, approximately $3 million in letters of credit draws were made from the Berry Credit Facility as requested by certain vendors owed prepetition amounts from the Company.
At December 31, 2015,2016, net outstanding checks of approximately $21$6 million were reclassified and included in “accounts payable and accrued expenses” on the condensed consolidated balance sheets. At June 30, 2016, nosheet. The change in net outstanding checks were reclassified. Net outstanding checks areis presented as cash flows from financing activities and included in “other” on the condensed consolidated statements of cash flows.
Note 1416 – Related Party Transactions
Berry Petroleum Company, LLC
Berry, a former subsidiary of the Predecessor, was deconsolidated effective December 3, 2016 (see Note 4). The employees of Linn Operating, Inc. (“LOI”), a subsidiary of the Predecessor, provided services and support to Berry in accordance with an agency agreement and power of attorney between Berry and LOI. Upon deconsolidation, transactions between the Predecessor and Berry were no longer eliminated in consolidation and were treated as related party transactions. These transactions include, but are not limited to, management fees paid to the Company by Berry. On the Effective Date, Berry emerged from bankruptcy as a stand-alone, unaffiliated entity.
For the two months ended February 28, 2017, and the three months and the six months ended June 30, 2016, Berry incurred management fees of approximately $6 million, $18 million and $41 million, respectively, for services provided by LOI. The Predecessor also had accounts payable due to Berry of approximately $3 million included in “accounts payable and accrued expenses” on the condensed consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 2016. In addition, $25 million due to Berry was included in “liabilities subject to compromise” on the Predecessor’s condensed consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 2016.
LinnCo, LLC
LinnCo, an affiliate of LINN Energy,the Predecessor, was formed on April 30, 2012. LinnCo’s initial sole purpose was to own units in LINN Energy. In connection with the 2013 acquisition of Berry, LinnCo amended its limited liability company agreement to permit, among other things, the acquisition and subsequent contribution of assets to LINN Energy. All of LinnCo’s common shares arewere held by the public. As of June 30,December 31, 2016, LinnCo had no significant assets or operations other than those related to its interest in LINN Energythe Predecessor and owned approximately 69% of LINN Energy’s outstanding units.
In March 2016, LinnCo filed a Registration Statement on Form S-4 related to an offer to exchange each outstanding unit representing limited liability company interests of LINN Energy for one common share representing limited liability company interests of LinnCo. The initial offer expired on April 25, 2016, and on April 26, 2016, LinnCo commenced a subsequent offering period that expired on August 1, 2016. Through June 30, 2016, 115,702,524 LINN Energy units were exchanged for an equal number of LinnCo shares. As a result71% of the exchangesPredecessor’s then outstanding units. In accordance with the Plan, LinnCo will be dissolved following the resolution of LINN Energy units for LinnCo shares, LinnCo’s ownershipall outstanding claims.

25

Table of Contents
LINN ENERGY, LLC (DEBTOR-IN-POSSESSION)
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – Continued
(Unaudited)

of LINN Energy’s outstanding units increased from approximately 36% at March 31, 2016, to approximately 69% at June 30, 2016.
LINN Energy hasThe Predecessor had agreed to provide to LinnCo, or to pay on LinnCo’s behalf, any financial, legal, accounting, tax advisory, financial advisory and engineering fees, and other administrative and out-of-pocket expenses incurred by LinnCo, along with any other expenses incurred in connection with any public offering of shares in LinnCo or incurred as a result of being a publicly traded entity. These expenses include costs associated with annual, quarterly and other reports to holders of LinnCo shares, tax return and Form 1099 preparation and distribution, NASDAQ listing fees, printing costs, independent auditor fees and expenses, legal counsel fees and expenses, limited liability company governance and compliance expenses and registrar and transfer agent fees. In addition, the Company hasPredecessor had agreed to indemnify LinnCo and its officers and directors for damages suffered or costs incurred (other than income taxes payable by LinnCo) in connection with carrying out LinnCo’s activities. All expenses and costs paid by LINN Energythe Predecessor on LinnCo’s behalf arewere expensed by LINN Energy.the Predecessor.
For the two months ended February 28, 2017, LinnCo incurred total general and administrative expenses of approximately $287,000, including approximately $240,000 related to services provided by the Predecessor. All of the expenses incurred during the two months ended February 28, 2017, had been paid by the Predecessor on LinnCo’s behalf as of February 28, 2017.
For the three months and six months ended June 30, 2016, LinnCo incurred total general and administrative expenses, reorganization expenses and offering costs of approximately $2.5 million and $4.2 million, respectively, including approximately $603,000 and $1.2 million, respectively, related to services provided by the LINN Energy. Of the expenses and costs incurred during the six months ended June 30, 2016, approximately $4.0 million had been paid by LINN Energy on LinnCo’s behalf as of June 30, 2016.
For the three months and six months ended June 30, 2015, LinnCo incurred total general and administrative expenses and offering costs of approximately $1.1 million and $2.5 million, respectively, including approximately $492,000 and $983,000, respectively, related to services provided by LINN Energy. Of the expenses and costs incurred during the six months ended June 30, 2015, approximately $2.2 million had been paid by LINN Energy on LinnCo’s behalf as of June 30, 2015.
The Company did not pay any distributions to LinnCo during the three months or six months ended June 30, 2016. During the three months and six months ended June 30, 2015, the Company paid approximately $40 million and $80 million, respectively, in distributions to LinnCo attributable to LinnCo’s interest in LINN Energy.
36
Other
One of the Company’s directors is the President and Chief Executive Officer of Superior Energy Services, Inc. (“Superior”), which provides oilfield services to the Company. For the three months and six months ended June 30, 2016, the Company incurred expenditures of approximately $1 million and $3 million, respectively, and for the three months and six months ended June 30, 2015, the Company incurred expenditures of approximately $2 million and $5 million, respectively, related to services rendered by Superior and its subsidiaries.

Note 15 – Subsidiary Guarantors
Linn Energy, LLC’s senior notes due May 2019, senior notes due November 2019, senior notes due April 2020, Second Lien Notes, senior notes due February 2021 and senior notes due September 2021 are guaranteed by all of the Company’s material subsidiaries, other than Berry Petroleum Company, LLC, which is an indirect 100% wholly owned subsidiary of the Company.
The following condensed consolidating financial information presents the financial information of Linn Energy, LLC, the guarantor subsidiaries and the non-guarantor subsidiary in accordance with SEC Regulation S-X Rule 3‑10. The condensed consolidating financial information for the co-issuer, Linn Energy Finance Corp., is not presented as it has no assets, operations or cash flows. The financial information may not necessarily be indicative of the financial position or results of operations had the guarantor subsidiaries or non-guarantor subsidiary operated as independent entities. There are no restrictions on the Company’s ability to obtain cash dividends or other distributions of funds from the guarantor subsidiaries.

26

LINN ENERGY, LLC (DEBTOR-IN-POSSESSION)INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – Continued
(Unaudited)

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING BALANCE SHEETSNote 17 – Redeemable Noncontrolling Interests
Redeemable noncontrolling interests on the condensed consolidated balance sheet as of June 30, 2016
 Linn Energy, LLC Guarantor Subsidiaries 
Non-
Guarantor Subsidiary
 Eliminations Consolidated
 (in thousands)
ASSETS       
Current assets:         
Cash and cash equivalents$425,594
 $334,043
 $15,008
 $
 $774,645
Accounts receivable – trade, net
 151,293
 51,304
 
 202,597
Accounts receivable – affiliates1,664,128
 38,660
 
 (1,702,788) 
Derivative instruments
 
 185
 
 185
Other current assets20,545
 69,136
 19,213
 
 108,894
Total current assets2,110,267
 593,132
 85,710
 (1,702,788) 1,086,321
          
Noncurrent assets:         
Oil and natural gas properties (successful efforts method)
 13,144,928
 5,019,722
 
 18,164,650
Less accumulated depletion and amortization
 (9,863,329) (2,719,219) 67,906
 (12,514,642)
 
 3,281,599
 2,300,503
 67,906
 5,650,008
          
Other property and equipment
 607,946
 118,875
 
 726,821
Less accumulated depreciation
 (205,621) (16,571) 
 (222,192)
 
 402,325
 102,304
 
 504,629
          
Restricted cash
 7,410
 197,418
 
 204,828
Notes receivable – affiliates161,100
 
 
 (161,100) 
Investments in consolidated subsidiaries2,434,999
 
 
 (2,434,999) 
Other noncurrent assets
 13,912
 17,548
 (72) 31,388
 2,596,099
 21,322
 214,966
 (2,596,171) 236,216
Total noncurrent assets2,596,099
 3,705,246
 2,617,773
 (2,528,265) 6,390,853
Total assets$4,706,366
 $4,298,378
 $2,703,483
 $(4,231,053) $7,477,174
          
LIABILITIES AND UNITHOLDERS’ CAPITAL (DEFICIT)      
Current liabilities:         
Accounts payable and accrued expenses$15
 $263,673
 $84,232
 $
 $347,920
Accounts payable – affiliates
 1,664,128
 38,660
 (1,702,788) 
Derivative instruments
 
 1,694
 
 1,694
Current portion of long-term debt, net1,937,450
 
 874,959
 
 2,812,409
Other accrued liabilities478
 44,404
 2,810
 
 47,692
Total current liabilities1,937,943
 1,972,205
 1,002,355
 (1,702,788) 3,209,715
          
Notes payable – affiliates
 161,100
 
 (161,100) 
Other noncurrent liabilities
 407,722
 180,522
 (72) 588,172
Liabilities subject to compromise4,167,313
 49,419
 852,426
 
 5,069,158
          
Unitholders’ capital (deficit):         
Units issued and outstanding5,352,381
 4,831,495
 2,798,713
 (7,621,189) 5,361,400
Accumulated deficit(6,751,271) (3,123,563) (2,130,533) 5,254,096
 (6,751,271)
 (1,398,890) 1,707,932
 668,180
 (2,367,093) (1,389,871)
Total liabilities and unitholders’ capital (deficit)$4,706,366
 $4,298,378
 $2,703,483
 $(4,231,053) $7,477,174
2017, relate to the noncontrolling Class B unitholders of Holdco. Class B units can be converted at any time by the holder to Class A-2 units of Holdco or Class A common stock of the Company in accordance with the terms of the Holdco LLC Agreement. As of June 30, 2017, the redeemable noncontrolling interests of approximately $28 million presented as temporary equity on the condensed consolidated balance sheet consists solely of the noncash share-based compensation related to the vested portion of the incentive interest awards in the form of Class B units issued to certain members of management (see Note 12). In accordance with the Holdco LLC Agreement, the requirements entitling Class B unitholders to Holdco distributions had not been met as of June 30, 2017, and, therefore, no allocation of net income (loss) was made to the redeemable noncontrolling interests for the four months ended June 30, 2017.

2737

LINN ENERGY, LLC (DEBTOR-IN-POSSESSION)
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – Continued
(Unaudited)

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING BALANCE SHEETS
December 31, 2015
 Linn Energy, LLC Guarantor Subsidiaries 
Non-
Guarantor Subsidiary
 Eliminations Consolidated
 (in thousands)
ASSETS       
Current assets:         
Cash and cash equivalents$1,073
 $72
 $1,023
 $
 $2,168
Accounts receivable – trade, net
 170,503
 46,053
 
 216,556
Accounts receivable – affiliates2,920,082
 8,621
 
 (2,928,703) 
Derivative instruments
 1,207,012
 13,218
 
 1,220,230
Other current assets25,090
 49,606
 20,897
 
 95,593
Total current assets2,946,245
 1,435,814
 81,191
 (2,928,703) 1,534,547
          
Noncurrent assets:         
Oil and natural gas properties (successful efforts method)
 13,110,094
 5,011,061
 
 18,121,155
Less accumulated depletion and amortization
 (9,557,283) (1,596,165) 55,956
 (11,097,492)
 
 3,552,811
 3,414,896
 55,956
 7,023,663
          
Other property and equipment
 597,216
 111,495
 
 708,711
Less accumulated depreciation
 (183,139) (12,522) 
 (195,661)
 
 414,077
 98,973
 
 513,050
          
Derivative instruments
 566,401
 
 
 566,401
Restricted cash
 7,004
 250,359
 
 257,363
Notes receivable – affiliates175,100
 
 
 (175,100) 
Investments in consolidated subsidiaries3,940,444
 
 
 (3,940,444) 
Other noncurrent assets
 17,178
 16,057
 (1) 33,234
 4,115,544
 590,583
 266,416
 (4,115,545) 856,998
Total noncurrent assets4,115,544
 4,557,471
 3,780,285
 (4,059,589) 8,393,711
Total assets$7,061,789
 $5,993,285
 $3,861,476
 $(6,988,292) $9,928,258
          
LIABILITIES AND UNITHOLDERS’ CAPITAL (DEFICIT)      
Current liabilities:         
Accounts payable and accrued expenses$1,285
 $336,962
 $117,127
 $
 $455,374
Accounts payable – affiliates
 2,920,082
 8,621
 (2,928,703) 
Derivative instruments
 
 2,241
 
 2,241
Current portion of long-term debt, net2,841,518
 
 873,175
 
 3,714,693
Other accrued liabilities49,861
 52,997
 16,735
 
 119,593
Total current liabilities2,892,664
 3,310,041
 1,017,899
 (2,928,703) 4,291,901
          
Derivative instruments
 857
 
 
 857
Long-term debt, net4,447,308
 
 845,368
 
 5,292,676
Notes payable – affiliates
 175,100
 
 (175,100) 
Other noncurrent liabilities
 399,676
 212,050
 (1) 611,725
          
Unitholders’ capital (deficit):         
Units issued and outstanding5,333,834
 4,831,758
 2,798,713
 (7,621,189) 5,343,116
Accumulated deficit(5,612,017) (2,724,147) (1,012,554) 3,736,701
 (5,612,017)
 (278,183) 2,107,611
 1,786,159
 (3,884,488) (268,901)
Total liabilities and unitholders’ capital (deficit)$7,061,789
 $5,993,285
 $3,861,476
 $(6,988,292) $9,928,258

28

LINN ENERGY, LLC (DEBTOR-IN-POSSESSION)
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – Continued
(Unaudited)

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
For the Three Months Ended June 30, 2016
 Linn Energy, LLC Guarantor Subsidiaries 
Non-
Guarantor Subsidiary
 Eliminations Consolidated
 (in thousands)
Revenues and other:         
Oil, natural gas and natural gas liquids sales$
 $216,426
 $99,831
 $
 $316,257
Gains (losses) on oil and natural gas derivatives
 (183,794) 1,026
 
 (182,768)
Marketing revenues
 8,551
 5,969
 
 14,520
Other revenues
 5,573
 1,813
 
 7,386
 
 46,756
 108,639
 
 155,395
Expenses:         
Lease operating expenses
 73,127
 42,416
 
 115,543
Transportation expenses
 41,092
 10,945
 
 52,037
Marketing expenses
 6,727
 4,578
 
 11,305
General and administrative expenses
 34,898
 24,748
 
 59,646
Exploration costs
 48
 
 
 48
Depreciation, depletion and amortization
 104,718
 41,186
 (2,733) 143,171
Taxes, other than income taxes
 20,852
 9,995
 
 30,847
Losses on sale of assets and other, net
 2,517
 425
 
 2,942
 
 283,979
 134,293
 (2,733) 415,539
Other income and (expenses):         
Interest expense, net of amounts capitalized(52,118) 36
 (16,352) 
 (68,434)
Interest expense – affiliates
 (2,969) 
 2,969
 
Interest income – affiliates2,969
 
 
 (2,969) 
Equity in losses from consolidated subsidiaries(240,209) 
 
 240,209
 
Other, net(1,237) 11
 (76) 
 (1,302)
 (290,595) (2,922) (16,428) 240,209
 (69,736)
Reorganization items, net499,087
 (13,289) 49,086
 
 534,884
Income (loss) before income taxes208,492
 (253,434) 7,004
 242,942
 205,004
Income tax expense (benefit)
 (3,652) 164
 
 (3,488)
Net income (loss)$208,492
 $(249,782) $6,840
 $242,942
 $208,492

29

LINN ENERGY, LLC (DEBTOR-IN-POSSESSION)
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – Continued
(Unaudited)

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
For the Three Months Ended June 30, 2015
 Linn Energy, LLC Guarantor Subsidiaries 
Non-
Guarantor Subsidiary
 Eliminations Consolidated
 (in thousands)
Revenues and other:         
Oil, natural gas and natural gas liquids sales$
 $323,038
 $173,381
 $
 $496,419
Losses on oil and natural gas derivatives
 (186,714) (4,474) 
 (191,188)
Marketing revenues
 3,285
 7,448
 
 10,733
Other revenues
 4,329
 1,535
 
 5,864
 
 143,938
 177,890
 
 321,828
Expenses:         
Lease operating expenses
 90,756
 49,896
 
 140,652
Transportation expenses
 42,817
 12,978
 
 55,795
Marketing expenses
 3,161
 5,998
 
 9,159
General and administrative expenses
 61,548
 37,102
 
 98,650
Exploration costs
 564
 
 
 564
Depreciation, depletion and amortization
 150,739
 63,052
 1,941
 215,732
Taxes, other than income taxes
 35,838
 22,196
 
 58,034
Gains on sale of assets and other, net
 (17,185) (811) 
 (17,996)
 
 368,238
 190,411
 1,941
 560,590
Other income and (expenses):         
Interest expense, net of amounts capitalized(123,555) 145
 (22,690) 
 (146,100)
Interest expense – affiliates
 (3,235) 
 3,235
 
Interest income – affiliates3,235
 
 
 (3,235) 
Gain on extinguishment of debt2,320
 
 6,831
 
 9,151
Equity in losses from consolidated subsidiaries(255,426) 
 
 255,426
 
Other, net(5,701) 18
 (463) 
 (6,146)
 (379,127) (3,072) (16,322) 255,426
 (143,095)
Loss before income taxes(379,127) (227,372) (28,843) 253,485
 (381,857)
Income tax benefit
 (2,719) (11) 
 (2,730)
Net loss$(379,127) $(224,653) $(28,832) $253,485
 $(379,127)


30

LINN ENERGY, LLC (DEBTOR-IN-POSSESSION)
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – Continued
(Unaudited)

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2016
 Linn Energy, LLC Guarantor Subsidiaries 
Non-
Guarantor Subsidiary
 Eliminations Consolidated
 (in thousands)
Revenues and other:         
Oil, natural gas and natural gas liquids sales$
 $416,275
 $183,297
 $
 $599,572
Gains (losses) on oil and natural gas derivatives
 (74,341) 1,534
 
 (72,807)
Marketing revenues
 17,612
 11,213
 
 28,825
Other revenues
 10,711
 3,861
 
 14,572
 
 370,257
 199,905
 
 570,162
Expenses:         
Lease operating expenses
 160,679
 92,509
 
 253,188
Transportation expenses
 83,086
 23,874
 
 106,960
Marketing expenses
 14,560
 9,033
 
 23,593
General and administrative expenses
 96,255
 49,920
 
 146,175
Exploration costs
 2,741
 
 
 2,741
Depreciation, depletion and amortization
 212,763
 100,029
 (5,563) 307,229
Impairment of long-lived assets
 129,703
 1,030,588
 (6,387) 1,153,904
Taxes, other than income taxes2
 40,604
 24,308
 
 64,914
Losses on sale of assets and other, net
 3,786
 233
 
 4,019
 2
 744,177
 1,330,494
 (11,950) 2,062,723
Other income and (expenses):         
Interest expense, net of amounts capitalized(137,590) 241
 (36,304) 
 (173,653)
Interest expense – affiliates
 (5,938) 
 5,938
 
Interest income – affiliates5,938
 
 
 (5,938) 
Equity in losses from consolidated subsidiaries(1,505,445) 
 
 1,505,445
 
Other, net(1,242) 84
 (10) 
 (1,168)
 (1,638,339) (5,613) (36,314) 1,505,445
 (174,821)
Reorganization items, net499,087
 (13,289) 49,086
 
 534,884
Loss before income taxes(1,139,254) (392,822) (1,117,817) 1,517,395
 (1,132,498)
Income tax expense
 6,594
 162
 
 6,756
Net loss$(1,139,254) $(399,416) $(1,117,979) $1,517,395
 $(1,139,254)

31

LINN ENERGY, LLC (DEBTOR-IN-POSSESSION)
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – Continued
(Unaudited)

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2015
 Linn Energy, LLC Guarantor Subsidiaries 
Non-
Guarantor Subsidiary
 Eliminations Consolidated
 (in thousands)
Revenues and other:         
Oil, natural gas and natural gas liquids sales$
 $617,021
 $329,967
 $
 $946,988
Gains (losses) on oil and natural gas derivatives
 234,800
 (1,207) 
 233,593
Marketing revenues
 29,497
 14,980
 
 44,477
Other revenues
 9,886
 3,431
 
 13,317
 
 891,204
 347,171
 
 1,238,375
Expenses:         
Lease operating expenses
 196,588
 117,085
 
 313,673
Transportation expenses
 83,751
 25,584
 
 109,335
Marketing expenses
 26,357
 11,643
 
 38,000
General and administrative expenses
 119,329
 58,289
 
 177,618
Exploration costs
 960
 
 
 960
Depreciation, depletion and amortization
 291,438
 136,031
 3,277
 430,746
Impairment of long-lived assets
 325,417
 272,000
 (64,800) 532,617
Taxes, other than income taxes2
 66,549
 45,528
 
 112,079
Gains on sale of assets and other, net
 (24,999) (5,284) 
 (30,283)
 2
 1,085,390
 660,876
 (61,523) 1,684,745
Other income and (expenses):         
Interest expense, net of amounts capitalized(246,941) 1,851
 (44,111) 
 (289,201)
Interest expense – affiliates
 (5,617) 
 5,617
 
Interest income – affiliates5,617
 
 
 (5,617) 
Gain on extinguishment of debt8,955
 
 6,831
 
 15,786
Equity in losses from consolidated subsidiaries(478,237) 
 
 478,237
 
Other, net(7,679) (47) (633) 
 (8,359)
 (718,285) (3,813) (37,913) 478,237
 (281,774)
Loss before income taxes(718,287) (197,999) (351,618) 539,760
 (728,144)
Income tax benefit
 (9,796) (61) 
 (9,857)
Net loss$(718,287) $(188,203) $(351,557) $539,760
 $(718,287)


32

LINN ENERGY, LLC (DEBTOR-IN-POSSESSION)
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – Continued
(Unaudited)

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2016
 Linn Energy, LLC Guarantor Subsidiaries 
Non-
Guarantor Subsidiary
 Eliminations Consolidated
 (in thousands)
Cash flow from operating activities:         
Net loss$(1,139,254) $(399,416) $(1,117,979) $1,517,395
 $(1,139,254)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:         
Depreciation, depletion and amortization
 212,763
 100,029
 (5,563) 307,229
Impairment of long-lived assets
 129,703
 1,030,588
 (6,387) 1,153,904
Unit-based compensation expenses
 18,553
 
 
 18,553
Amortization and write-off of deferred financing fees9,227
 
 602
 
 9,829
(Gains) losses on sale of assets and other, net
 3,929
 (642) 
 3,287
Equity in losses from consolidated subsidiaries1,505,445
 
 
 (1,505,445) 
Deferred income taxes
 3,850
 71
 
 3,921
Reorganization items(498,954) 
 (56,968) 
 (555,922)
Derivatives activities:         
Total losses
 74,341
 2,871
 
 77,212
Cash settlements
 500,075
 8,022
 
 508,097
Cash settlements on canceled derivatives
 356,835
 1,593
 
 358,428
Changes in assets and liabilities:         
(Increase) decrease in accounts receivable – trade, net
 17,993
 (8,296) 
 9,697
(Increase) decrease in accounts receivable – affiliates437,406
 (30,039) 
 (407,367) 
Increase in other assets
 (19,039) (1,035) 
 (20,074)
Increase (decrease) in accounts payable and accrued expenses(36) 47,098
 (4,362) 
 42,700
Increase (decrease) in accounts payable and accrued expenses – affiliates
 (437,406) 30,039
 407,367
 
Increase (decrease) in other liabilities37,278
 (11,128) (2,556) 
 23,594
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities351,112
 468,112
 (18,023) 
 801,201
Cash flow from investing activities:         
Development of oil and natural gas properties
 (88,205) (12,360) 
 (100,565)
Purchases of other property and equipment
 (13,794) (7,599) 
 (21,393)
Decrease in restricted cash
 
 53,418
 
 53,418
Change in notes receivable with affiliate14,000
 
 
 (14,000) 
Proceeds from sale of properties and equipment and other(4,010) 1,297
 142
 
 (2,571)
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities9,990
 (100,702) 33,601
 (14,000) (71,111)

33

LINN ENERGY, LLC (DEBTOR-IN-POSSESSION)
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – Continued
(Unaudited)

 Linn Energy, LLC Guarantor Subsidiaries 
Non-
Guarantor Subsidiary
 Eliminations Consolidated
 (in thousands)
Cash flow from financing activities:         
Proceeds from borrowings978,500
 
 
 
 978,500
Repayments of debt(913,210) 
 (1,593) 
 (914,803)
Financing fees and offering costs(623) 
 
 
 (623)
Change in notes payable with affiliate
 (14,000) 
 14,000
 
Other(1,248) (19,439) 
 
 (20,687)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities63,419
 (33,439) (1,593) 14,000
 42,387
          
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents424,521
 333,971
 13,985
 
 772,477
Cash and cash equivalents:         
Beginning1,073
 72
 1,023
 
 2,168
Ending$425,594
 $334,043
 $15,008
 $
 $774,645

34

LINN ENERGY, LLC (DEBTOR-IN-POSSESSION)
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – Continued
(Unaudited)

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2015
 Linn Energy, LLC Guarantor Subsidiaries 
Non-
Guarantor Subsidiary
 Eliminations Consolidated
 (in thousands)
Cash flow from operating activities:         
Net loss$(718,287) $(188,203) $(351,557) $539,760
 $(718,287)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by operating activities:         
Depreciation, depletion and amortization
 291,438
 136,031
 3,277
 430,746
Impairment of long-lived assets
 325,417
 272,000
 (64,800) 532,617
Unit-based compensation expenses
 33,711
 
 
 33,711
Gain on extinguishment of debt(8,955) 
 (6,831) 
 (15,786)
Amortization and write-off of deferred financing fees16,692
 
 854
 
 17,546
Gains on sale of assets and other, net
 (22,903) (2,991) 
 (25,894)
Equity in losses from consolidated subsidiaries478,237
 
 
 (478,237) 
Deferred income taxes
 (9,796) (61) 
 (9,857)
Derivatives activities:         
Total gains
 (234,800) (1,853) 
 (236,653)
Cash settlements
 533,400
 32,943
 
 566,343
Changes in assets and liabilities:         
Decrease in accounts receivable – trade, net
 154,697
 15,281
 
 169,978
(Increase) decrease in accounts receivable – affiliates371,275
 (15,425) 
 (355,850) 
Decrease in other assets
 8
 3,515
 
 3,523
Decrease in accounts payable and accrued expenses
 (43,427) (4,047) 
 (47,474)
Increase (decrease) in accounts payable and accrued expenses – affiliates
 (371,275) 15,425
 355,850
 
Decrease in other liabilities(3,597) (13,124) (10,310) 
 (27,031)
Net cash provided by operating activities135,365
 439,718
 98,399
 
 673,482
Cash flow from investing activities:         
Development of oil and natural gas properties
 (413,271) (3,076) 
 (416,347)
Purchases of other property and equipment
 (26,305) (2,982) 
 (29,287)
Investment in affiliates57,223
 
 
 (57,223) 
Change in notes receivable with affiliate(30,400) 
 
 30,400
 
Proceeds from sale of properties and equipment and other(2,168) 49,580
 11,302
 
 58,714
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities24,655
 (389,996) 5,244
 (26,823) (386,920)
          

35

LINN ENERGY, LLC (DEBTOR-IN-POSSESSION)
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – Continued
(Unaudited)

 Linn Energy, LLC Guarantor Subsidiaries 
Non-
Guarantor Subsidiary
 Eliminations Consolidated
 (in thousands)
Cash flow from financing activities:         
Proceeds from sale of units233,427
 
 
 
 233,427
Proceeds from borrowings645,000
 
 
 
 645,000
Repayments of debt(804,698) 
 (45,353) 
 (850,051)
Distributions to unitholders(212,631) 
 
 
 (212,631)
Financing fees and offering costs(8,646) 
 (3) 
 (8,649)
Change in notes payable with affiliate
 30,400
 
 (30,400) 
Distributions to affiliate
 
 (57,223) 57,223
 
Excess tax benefit from unit-based compensation(9,467) 
 
 
 (9,467)
Other(3,008) (79,063) 14
 
 (82,057)
Net cash used in financing activities(160,023) (48,663) (102,565) 26,823
 (284,428)
          
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents(3) 1,059
 1,078
 
 2,134
Cash and cash equivalents:         
Beginning38
 185
 1,586
 
 1,809
Ending$35
 $1,244
 $2,664
 $
 $3,943

Item 2.Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and related notes included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015.2016. The following discussion contains forward-looking statements based on expectations, estimates and assumptions. Actual results may differ materially from those discussed in the forward-looking statements. Factors that could cause or contribute to such differences include, but are not limited to, market prices for oil, natural gas and NGL, production volumes, estimates of proved reserves, capital expenditures, economic and competitive conditions, credit and capital market conditions, regulatory changes and other uncertainties, as well as those factors set forth in “Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Statements” below and in Item 1A. “Risk Factors” in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015,2016, and elsewhere in the Annual Report.
When referring to Linn Energy, LLCInc. (formerly known as Linn Energy, LLC) (“LINNSuccessor,” “LINN Energy” or the “Company”), the intent is to refer to LINN Energy, a newly formed Delaware corporation, and its consolidated subsidiaries as a whole or on an individual basis, depending on the context in which the statements are made. Linn Energy, Inc. is a successor issuer of Linn Energy, LLC pursuant to Rule 15d-5 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). When referring to the “Predecessor” in reference to the period prior to the emergence from bankruptcy, the intent is to refer to Linn Energy, LLC, the predecessor that will be dissolved following the effective date of the Plan (as defined below) and resolution of all outstanding claims, and its consolidated subsidiaries as a whole or on an individual basis, depending on the context in which the statements are made.
The reference to “Berry” herein refers to Berry Petroleum Company, LLC, which iswas an indirect 100% wholly owned subsidiary of LINN Energy.the Predecessor through February 28, 2017. Berry was deconsolidated effective December 3, 2016 (see below and Note 4). The reference to “LinnCo” herein refers to LinnCo, LLC, which is an affiliate of LINN Energy.the Predecessor.
The reference to a “Note” herein refers to the accompanying Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements contained in Item 1. “Financial Statements.”
Executive Overview
LINN Energy’s mission is to acquire, develop and maximize cash flow from a growing portfolio of long-life oil and natural gas assets. LINN Energy is an independent oil and natural gas company that began operationswas formed in March 2003February 2017, in connection with the reorganization of the Predecessor. The Predecessor was publicly traded from January 2006 to February 2017. As discussed further below and completedin Note 2, on May 11, 2016 (the “Petition Date”), Linn Energy, LLC, certain of its initial public offeringdirect and indirect subsidiaries, and LinnCo (collectively, the “LINN Debtors”) and Berry (collectively with the LINN Debtors, the “Debtors”), filed voluntary petitions (“Bankruptcy Petitions”) for relief under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code (“Bankruptcy Code”) in January 2006. the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Texas (“Bankruptcy Court”). The Debtors’ Chapter 11 cases were administered jointly under the caption In re Linn Energy, LLC, et al., Case No. 16‑60040. During the pendency of the Chapter 11 proceedings, the Debtors operated their businesses as “debtors-in-possession” under the jurisdiction of the Bankruptcy Court and in accordance with the applicable provisions of the Bankruptcy Code. The Company emerged from bankruptcy effective February 28, 2017.
On December 3, 2016, LINN Energy filed an amended plan of reorganization that excluded Berry. As a result of its loss of control of Berry, LINN Energy concluded that it was appropriate to deconsolidate Berry effective on the aforementioned date and classified it as discontinued operations.
The Company’s properties are currently located in eightseven operating regions in the United States (“U.S.”):
Rockies, which includes properties located in Wyoming (Green River, Washakie and Powder River basins)(Washakie Basin), Utah (Uinta Basin), and North Dakota (Williston Basin) and Colorado (Piceance Basin);
Hugoton Basin, which includes properties located in Kansas, the Oklahoma Panhandle and the Shallow Texas Panhandle;
California, which includes properties located in the San Joaquin Valley and Los Angeles basins;
Mid-Continent, which includes Oklahoma properties located in the Anadarko and Arkoma basins, as well as waterfloods in the Central Oklahoma Platform;
TexLa, which includes properties located in east Texas and north Louisiana;
Permian Basin, which includes properties located in west Texas and southeast New Mexico;
Michigan/Illinois, which includes properties located in the Antrim Shale formation in north Michigan and oil properties in south Illinois; and
South Texas.
Results for the three months ended June 30, 2016, included the following:
oil, natural gas and NGL sales of approximately $316 million compared to $496 million for the three months ended June 30, 2015;
average daily production of approximately 1,079 MMcfe/d compared to 1,219 MMcfe/d for the three months ended June 30, 2015;
net income of approximately $208 million compared to net loss of $379 million for the three months ended June 30, 2015;
capital expenditures of approximately $29 million compared to $115 million for the three months ended June 30, 2015; and
39 wells drilled (all successful) compared to 148 wells drilled (all successful) for the three months ended June 30, 2015.
Results for the six months ended June 30, 2016, included the following:
oil, natural gas and NGL sales of approximately $600 million compared to $947 million for the six months ended June 30, 2015;

37

Item 2.Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Continued

average daily production of approximately 1,096 MMcfe/d compared to 1,210 MMcfe/d for the six months ended June 30, 2015;
net loss of approximately $1.1 billion compared to $718 million for the six months ended June 30, 2015;
net cash provided by operating activities of approximately $801 million compared to $673 million for the six months ended June 30, 2015;
capital expenditures of approximately $66 million compared to $312 million for the six months ended June 30, 2015; and
112 wells drilled (111 successful) compared to 344 wells drilled (all successful) for the six months ended June 30, 2015.
Chapter 11 Proceedings
On May 11, 2016 (the “Petition Date”), the Company and certain of its direct and indirect subsidiaries (collectively with the Company, the “LINN Debtors”), LinnCo and Berry (collectively with the LINN Debtors and LinnCo, the “Debtors”), filed voluntary petitions (“Bankruptcy Petitions”) for relief under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code (“Bankruptcy Code”) in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Texas (“Bankruptcy Court”). The Debtors’ Chapter 11 cases are being administered jointly under the caption In re Linn Energy, LLC., et al., Case No. 16‑60040.
The condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared as if the Company is a going concern and reflect the application of Accounting Standards Codification 852 “Reorganizations” (“ASC 852”). ASC 852 requires that the financial statements, for periods subsequent to the Chapter 11 filing, distinguish transactions and events that are directly associated with the reorganization from the ongoing operations of the business. Accordingly, certain expenses, gains and losses that are realized or incurred in the bankruptcy proceedings are recorded in “reorganization items, net” on the Company’s condensed consolidated statements of operations. In addition, prepetition unsecured and under-secured obligations that may be impacted by the bankruptcy reorganization process have been classified as “liabilities subject to compromise” on the Company’s condensed consolidated balance sheet at June 30, 2016. These liabilities are reported at the amounts expected to be allowed as claims by the Bankruptcy Court, although they may be settled for less.
The Debtors are operating their businesses as “debtors-in-possession” under the jurisdiction of the Bankruptcy Court and in accordance with the applicable provisions of the Bankruptcy Code. The Bankruptcy Court has granted certain relief requested by the Debtors, allowing the Company to use its cash to fund the Chapter 11 proceedings, pursuant to an agreement with the first lien lenders, and giving the Company the authority to, among other things, continue to pay employee wages and benefits without interruption, to utilize its current cash management system and to make royalty payments. During the pendency of the Chapter 11 proceedings, all transactions outside the ordinary course of the Company’s business require prior approval of the Bankruptcy Court. For goods and services provided following the Petition Date, the Company intends to pay vendors in full under normal terms.
Restructuring Support Agreement
Prior to the Petition Date, on May 10, 2016, the Debtors entered into a restructuring support agreement (“Restructuring Support Agreement”) with certain holders (“Consenting Creditors”) collectively holding or controlling at least 66.67% by aggregate outstanding principal amounts under (i) the Company’s Sixth Amended and Restated Credit Agreement (“LINN Credit Facility”) and (ii) Berry’s Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement (“Berry Credit Facility”).
The Restructuring Support Agreement sets forth, subject to certain conditions, the commitment of the Consenting Creditors to support a comprehensive restructuring of the Debtors’ long-term debt (“Restructuring Transactions”). The Restructuring Transactions will be effectuated through one or more plans of reorganization (“Plan”) to be filed in the Chapter 11 proceedings.
Certain principal terms of the Plan are outlined below. See Item 1A. “Risk Factors” for risks relating to Chapter 11 proceedings, including the risk that the Company may not be able to obtain confirmation of a Chapter 11 plan of reorganization.
Claims under the LINN Credit Facility will receive participation in a new company $2.2 billion reserve-based and term loan credit facility, as described further below (“New LINN Exit Facility”), and payment of the remainder of claims under the LINN Credit Facility (if any) in cash or, to the extent not viable, a later-agreed-upon alternative consideration.

38

Item 2.Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Continued

Michigan/Illinois, which includes properties located in the Antrim Shale formation in north Michigan and oil properties in south Illinois; and
South Texas.
In July 2017, the Company divested all of its properties located in California. See below and Note 4 for details of the Company’s divestitures.
The Company’s 12.00% senior secured second lien notes due December 2020 (“Second Lien Notes”) will be allowed ascurrent focus is the upstream and midstream development of the Merge/SCOOP/STACK in Oklahoma. Additionally, the Company is pursuing emerging horizontal opportunities in the Mid-Continent, Rockies and TexLa regions while continuing to add value by efficiently operating and applying new technology to a $2.0diverse set of long-life producing assets.
For the three months ended June 30, 2017, the Company’s results included the following:
oil, natural gas and NGL sales of approximately $243 million compared to $196 million for the three months ended June 30, 2016;
average daily production of approximately 710 MMcfe/d compared to 802 MMcfe/d for the three months ended June 30, 2016;
net income of approximately $220 million compared to $208 million for the three months ended June 30, 2016;
capital expenditures of approximately $96 million compared to $23 million for the three months ended June 30, 2016; and
14 wells drilled (all successful) compared to 37 wells drilled (all successful) for the three months ended June 30, 2016.
For the six months ended June 30, 2017, the Company’s results included the following:
oil, natural gas and NGL sales of approximately $323 million and $189 million for the four months ended June 30, 2017, and the two months ended February 28, 2017, respectively, compared to $380 million for the six months ended June 30, 2016;
average daily production of approximately 722 MMcfe/d and 745 MMcfe/d for the four months ended June 30, 2017, and the two months ended February 28, 2017, respectively, compared to 813 MMcfe/d for the six months ended June 30, 2016;
net income of approximately $213 million and $2.4 billion unsecured claim consistent withfor the settlement agreement, dated April 4, 2016, enteredfour months ended June 30, 2017, and the two months ended February 28, 2017, respectively, compared to a net loss of approximately $1.1 billion for the six months ended June 30, 2016;
net cash provided by operating activities from continuing operations of approximately $117 million and net cash used in operating activities of approximately $30 million for the four months ended June 30, 2017, and the two months ended February 28, 2017, respectively, compared to net cash provided by operating activities of approximately $800 million for the six months ended June 30, 2016;
capital expenditures of approximately $114 million and $46 million for the four months ended June 30, 2017, and the two months ended February 28, 2017, respectively, compared to $53 million for the six months ended June 30, 2016; and
41 wells drilled (all successful) compared to 96 wells drilled (95 successful) for the six months ended June 30, 2016.
Predecessor and Successor Reporting
As a result of the application of fresh start accounting (see Note 3), the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements and certain note presentations are separated into two distinct periods, the period before the Effective Date (labeled Predecessor) and the period after that date (labeled Successor), to indicate the application of a different basis of accounting between the Company and certain holdersperiods presented. Despite this separate presentation, there was continuity of the Second Lien Notes.
Unsecured claims against the LINN Debtors, including under the Second Lien Notes and the Company’s unsecured notes, will convert to equity in the reorganized Company or reorganized LinnCo (“New LINN Common Stock”) in to-be-determined allocations.
The Restructuring Support Agreement contemplates that Berry will separate from the LINN Debtors under the Plan. Claims under the Berry Credit Facility will receive participation in a new Berry exit facility, if any, and a to-be-determined allocation of equity in reorganized Berry (“New Berry Common Stock”).
Unsecured claims against Berry, including under Berry’s unsecured notes, will receive a to-be-determined allocation of New Berry Common Stock up to the full amount of Berry’s unencumbered collateral and/or collateral value in excess of amounts outstanding under the Berry Credit Facility.
Cash payments under the Plan may be funded by rights offerings or other new-money investments. The Restructuring Support Agreement contemplates that Berry may undertake a marketing process for the opportunity to sponsor its Plan.
All existing equity interests of the Company, LinnCo and Berry will be extinguished without recovery.
The New LINN Exit Facility will consist of (i) a term loan in the amount of $800 million (“New LINN Term Loan”) and (ii) a revolving loan in the initial amount of $1.4 billion (“New LINN Revolving Loan”). The New LINN Term Loan will mature on the earlier of June 30, 2021, or the day prior to the fourth anniversary of the closing date, with interest payable at LIBOR plus 7.50% and amortized principal payments payable quarterly, beginning March 31, 2017. The New LINN Revolving Loan will be composed of two tranches as follows: (a) a conforming tranche with an initial amount of $1.2 billion subject to the borrowing base (“Conforming Tranche”) and (b) a non-conforming tranche with an initial amount of $200 million (“Non-Conforming Tranche”). The Conforming Tranche will mature on the earlier of June 30, 2021, or the day prior to the fourth anniversary of the closing date, with an interest rate of LIBOR plus 3.50%. The Non-Conforming Tranche will mature on the earlier of December 31, 2020, or the day prior to the date that is three years and six months after the closing date, with an interest rate of LIBOR plus 5.50%. The New LINN Exit Facility is subject to a variety of other terms and conditions including conditions precedent to funding, financial covenants and various other covenants and representations and warranties.
The Plan will provide for the establishment of a customary management incentive plan at the Company and Berry under which no less than 10% of the New LINN Common Stock and New Berry Common Stock, respectively, will be reserved for grants made from time to time to the officers and other key employees of the respective reorganized entities. The Plan will provide for releases of specified claims held by the Debtors, the Consenting Creditors and certain other specified parties against one another and for customary exculpations and injunctions.
The Restructuring Support Agreement provides that the Consenting Creditors will support the use of the LINN Debtors’ and Berry’s cash collateral under specified terms and conditions, including adequate protection terms. The Restructuring Support Agreement obligates the Debtors and the Consenting Creditors to, among other things, support and not interfere with consummation of the Restructuring Transactions and, as to the Consenting Creditors, vote their claims in favor of the Plan. The Restructuring Support Agreement may be terminated upon the occurrence of certain events, including the failure to meet specified milestones relating to, among other requirements, the filing, confirmation and consummation of the Plan, and in the event of breaches by the parties of certain provisions of the Restructuring Support Agreement. The Restructuring Support Agreement is subject to termination if the effective date of the Plan has not occurred within 250 days of the Petition Date. There can be no assurance that the Restructuring Transactions will be consummated.
Magnitude of Potential Claims
On July 11, 2016, the Debtors filed with the Bankruptcy Court schedules and statements setting forth, among other things, the assets and liabilities of the Debtors, subject to the assumptions filed in connection therewith. The schedules and statements may be subject to further amendment or modification after filing. Holders of prepetition claims will be required to file proofs of claims by the applicable deadline for filing certain proofs of claims in the Debtors’ Chapter 11 cases. The court has not yet confirmed the claims deadlines. Differences between amounts scheduled by the Debtors and claims by creditors will be investigated and resolved in connection with the claims resolution process.operations.

39

Item 2.Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Continued

EffectChapter 11 Proceedings
On the Petition Date, the Debtors filed Bankruptcy Petitions for relief under Chapter 11 of Filing on Creditors and Unitholders
Subject to certain exceptions, under the Bankruptcy Code in the filingBankruptcy Court. The Debtors’ Chapter 11 cases were administered jointly under the caption In re Linn Energy, LLC, et al., Case No. 16‑60040.
On December 3, 2016, the LINN Debtors filed the Amended Joint Chapter 11 Plan of Reorganization of Linn Energy, LLC and Its Debtor Affiliates Other Than Linn Acquisition Company, LLC (“LAC”) and Berry Petroleum Company, LLC (the “Plan”). The LINN Debtors subsequently filed amended versions of the Plan with the Bankruptcy Petitions automatically enjoined, or stayed,Court.
On December 13, 2016, LAC and Berry filed the continuationAmended Joint Chapter 11 Plan of most judicial or administrative proceedings or filingReorganization of other actions againstLinn Acquisition Company, LLC and Berry Petroleum Company, LLC (the “Berry Plan” and together with the Debtors or their property to recover, collect or secure a claim arising prior toPlan, the Petition Date. Absent an order“Plans”). LAC and Berry subsequently filed amended versions of the Berry Plan with the Bankruptcy Court.
On January 27, 2017, the Bankruptcy Court substantiallyentered an order approving and confirming the Plans (the “Confirmation Order”). On February 28, 2017 (the “Effective Date”), the Debtors satisfied the conditions to effectiveness of the respective Plans, the Plans became effective in accordance with their respective terms and LINN Energy and Berry emerged from bankruptcy as stand-alone, unaffiliated entities.
Plan of Reorganization
In accordance with the Plan, on the Effective Date:
The Predecessor transferred all of its assets, including equity interests in its subsidiaries, other than LAC and Berry, to Linn Energy Holdco II LLC (“Holdco II”), a newly formed subsidiary of the Predecessor and the borrower under the Credit Agreement (as amended, the “Successor Credit Facility”) entered into in connection with the reorganization, in exchange for 100% of the equity of Holdco II and the issuance of interests in the Successor Credit Facility to certain of the Predecessor’s creditors in partial satisfaction of their claims (the “Contribution”). Immediately following the Contribution, the Predecessor transferred 100% of the equity interests in Holdco II to the Successor in exchange for approximately $530 million in cash and an amount of equity securities in the Successor not to exceed 49.90% of the outstanding equity interests of the Successor, which the Predecessor distributed to certain of its creditors in satisfaction of their claims. Contemporaneously with the reorganization transactions and pursuant to the Plan, (i) LAC assigned all of its rights, title and interest in the membership interests of Berry to Berry Petroleum Corporation, (ii) all of the Debtors’ prepetition liabilities are subjectequity interests in LAC and the Predecessor were canceled and (iii) LAC and the Predecessor commenced liquidation, which is expected to settlementbe completed following the resolution of the respective companies’ outstanding claims.
The holders of claims under the Bankruptcy Code. AlthoughPredecessor’s Sixth Amended and Restated Credit Agreement (“Predecessor Credit Facility”) received a full recovery, consisting of a cash paydown and their pro rata share of the filing of Bankruptcy Petitions triggered defaults on the Debtors’ debt obligations, creditors are stayed from taking any actions against the Debtors as$1.7 billion Successor Credit Facility. As a result, all outstanding obligations under the Predecessor Credit Facility were canceled.
Holdco II, as borrower, entered into the Successor Credit Facility with the holders of such defaults, subjectclaims under the Predecessor Credit Facility, as lenders, and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as administrative agent, providing for a new reserve-based revolving loan with up to $1.4 billion in borrowing commitments and a new term loan in an original principal amount of $300 million. For additional information, see “Financing Activities” below.
The holders of the Company’s 12.00% senior secured second lien notes due December 2020 (the “Second Lien Notes”) received their pro rata share of (i) 17,678,889 shares of Class A common stock; (ii) certain limited exceptions permitted byrights to purchase shares of Class A common stock in the Bankruptcy Code.rights offerings, as described below; and (iii) $30 million in cash. The Company did not record interest expense on its Second Lien Notes orholders of the Company’s 6.50% senior notes fordue May 2019, 6.25% senior notes due November 2019, 8.625% senior notes due 2020, 7.75% senior notes due February 2021 and 6.50% senior notes due September 2021 (collectively, the period from May 12, 2016, through June 30, 2016. For that period, contractual interest on“Unsecured Notes”) received their pro rata share of (i) 26,724,396 shares of Class A common stock; and (ii) certain rights to purchase shares of Class A common stock in the rights offerings, as described below. As a result, all outstanding obligations under the Second Lien Notes and senior notes was approximately $54 million.
Under the Bankruptcy Code, unless creditors agree otherwise, prepetition liabilities and postpetition liabilities must be satisfied in full before the holders of the Company’s existing common units representing limited liability company interests (“units”) are entitled to receive any settlement or retain any property under a plan of reorganization. The ultimate recovery to creditors and/or unitholders, if any, will not be determined until confirmation and implementation of a plan or plans of reorganization. No assurance can be given as to what values, if any, will be ascribed in the Chapter 11 proceedings to each of these constituencies or what types or amounts of settlements, if any, they will receive. A plan of reorganization could result in holders of the Debtors’ liabilities and/or units receiving no settlement on account of their interests and cancellation of their holdings. The Company believes that it is highly likely that its existing units will be canceled in the Chapter 11 proceedings and will be entitled to a limited recovery, if any. Any trading in the Company’s units during the pendency of the Chapter 11 proceedings is highly speculative and poses substantial risks to purchasers of the Company’s units.
Appointment of Creditors Committee
On May 23, 2016, the Bankruptcy Court appointed the official committee for unsecured creditors (the “Creditors Committee”). The Creditors Committee and its legal representatives have a right to be heard on all matters that come before the Bankruptcy Court with respect to the Debtors.
Rejection of Executory Contracts
Subject to certain exceptions, under the Bankruptcy Code, the Debtors may assume, assign or reject certain executory contracts and unexpired leases subject to the approval of the Bankruptcy Court and satisfaction of certain other conditions. Generally, the rejection of an executory contract or unexpired lease is treated as a prepetition breach of such executory contract or unexpired lease and, subject to certain exceptions, relieves the Debtors of performing their future obligations under such executory contract or unexpired lease but entitles the contract counterparty or lessor to a prepetition general unsecured claim for damages caused by such deemed breach. Counterparties to such rejected contracts or leases may assert unsecured claims in the Bankruptcy Court against the applicable Debtors’ estate for damages. Generally, the assumption of an executory contract or unexpired lease requires the Debtors to cure existing monetary defaults under such executory contract or unexpired lease and provide adequate assurance of future performance. Accordingly, any description of an executory contract or unexpired lease with any of the Debtors in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, including where applicable a quantification of the Company’s obligations under any such executory contract or unexpired lease with the applicable Debtor, is qualified by any overriding rejection rights the Company has under the Bankruptcy Code. Further, nothing herein is or shall be deemed an admission with respect to any claim amounts or calculations arising from the rejection of any executory contract or unexpired leaseUnsecured Notes and the Debtors expressly preserve all of their rights with respect thereto.
Process for Plan of Reorganization
In order to successfully exit bankruptcy, the Debtors will need to propose, and obtain confirmation by the Bankruptcy Court of, a Plan that satisfies the requirements of the Bankruptcy Code. A Plan would, among other things, resolve the Debtors’ prepetitionindentures governing such obligations set forth the revised capital structure of the newly reorganized entity and provide for corporate governance subsequent to exit from bankruptcy.
The Debtors have an exclusive right to file a Plan within 120 days from the Petition Date, subject to an extension for cause. If the Debtors’ exclusive filing period lapses, any party in interest may file a Plan for any of the Debtors.
In addition to being voted on by holders of impaired claims and equity interests, a Plan must satisfy certain requirements of the Bankruptcy Code and must be approved, or confirmed, by the Bankruptcy Court in order to become effective. A Plan would be accepted by holders of claims against and equity interests in the Debtors if (i) at least one-half in number and two-thirds in dollar amount of claims actually voting in each class of claims impaired by the Plan have voted to accept the Plan and (ii) atwere canceled.

40

Item 2.Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Continued

least two-thirdsThe holders of general unsecured claims (other than claims relating to the Second Lien Notes and the Unsecured Notes) against the LINN Debtors (the “LINN Unsecured Claims”) received their pro rata share of cash from two cash distribution pools totaling $40 million, as divided between a $2.3 million cash distribution pool for the payment in full of allowed LINN Unsecured Claims in an amount equal to $2,500 or less (and larger claims for which the holders irrevocably agreed to reduce such claims to $2,500), and a $37.7 million cash distribution pool for pro rata distributions to all remaining allowed general LINN Unsecured Claims. As a result, all outstanding LINN Unsecured Claims were fully satisfied, settled, released and discharged as of equity interests impaired by the Plan actually voting has votedEffective Date.
All units of the Predecessor that were issued and outstanding immediately prior to accept the Plan.Effective Date were extinguished without recovery. On the Effective Date, the Successor issued in the aggregate 89,229,892 shares of Class A classcommon stock. No cash was raised from the issuance of claims or equity interests that does not receive or retain any property under the PlanClass A common stock on account of such claims or interests is deemedheld by the Predecessor’s creditors.
The Successor entered into a registration rights agreement with certain parties, pursuant to have votedwhich the Company agreed to, rejectamong other things, file a registration statement with the Plan.
Under certain circumstances set forth in Section 1129(b)Securities and Exchange Commission within 60 days of the Bankruptcy Code,Effective Date covering the Bankruptcy Court may confirm a Plan even if such Plan has not been accepted by all impaired classesoffer and resale of claims and equity interests. The precise requirements and evidentiary showing for confirming a Plan notwithstanding its rejection by one or more impaired classes of claims or equity interests depends upon a number of factors, including the status and seniority of the claims or equity interests in the rejecting class (i.e., unsecured or secured claims, subordinated or senior claims)“Registrable Securities” (as defined therein). Generally, with respect to units, a Plan may be “crammed down” even if the unitholders receive no recovery if the proponent
By operation of the Plan demonstrates that (1) no class junior toand the units are receiving or retaining property underConfirmation Order, the terms of the Predecessor’s board of directors expired as of the Effective Date. The Successor formed a new board of directors, consisting of the Chief Executive Officer of the Predecessor, one director selected by the Successor and five directors selected by a six-person selection committee.
Rights Offerings
On October 25, 2016, the Company entered into a backstop commitment agreement (“Backstop Commitment Agreement”) with the parties thereto (collectively, the “Backstop Parties”). In accordance with the Plan, the Backstop Commitment Agreement and (2) no class of claims or interests senior to the units are being paid more than in full.
The timing of filing a Plan by the Debtors will depend on the timing and outcome of numerous other ongoing mattersrights offerings procedures filed in the Chapter 11 proceedings. Although the Debtors expect to file a Plan that provides for emergence from bankruptcy as a going concern, there can be no assurance at this time that the Debtors will be able to successfully develop, confirmcases and consummate one or more plans of reorganization or other alternative restructuring transactions, including a sale of all or substantially all of the Debtors’ assets, that satisfies the conditions of the Bankruptcy Code and is confirmedapproved by the Bankruptcy Court, or that any such Plan will be implemented successfully.
As of August 4, 2016, the LINN Debtors have not yet filed a Plan.
Foroffered eligible creditors the duration of the Company’s Chapter 11 proceedings, the Company’s operations and abilityright to develop and execute its business plan are subject to the risks and uncertainties associated withpurchase Class A common stock upon emergence from the Chapter 11 process as described in Item 1A. “Risk Factors.” As a resultcases for an aggregate purchase price of these risks and uncertainties,$530 million.
Under the numberBackstop Commitment Agreement, certain Backstop Parties agreed to purchase their pro rata share of the Company’s units and unitholders, assets, liabilities, officers and/or directors could be significantly different followingshares that were not duly subscribed to pursuant to the outcomeofferings at the discounted per share price set forth in the Backstop Commitment Agreement by parties other than Backstop Parties (the “Backstop Commitment”). Pursuant to the Backstop Commitment Agreement, the LINN Debtors agreed to pay the Backstop Parties on the Effective Date a commitment premium equal to 4.0% of the Chapter 11 proceedings,$530 million committed amount (the “Backstop Commitment Premium”), of which 3.0% was paid in cash and 1.0% was paid in the form of Class A common stock at the discounted per share price set forth in the Backstop Commitment Agreement.
On the Effective Date, all conditions to the rights offerings and the descriptionBackstop Commitment Agreement were met, and the LINN Debtors completed the rights offerings and the related issuances of Class A common stock.
Divestitures
Below are the Company’s operations, propertiesdivestitures in 2017:
The Company entered into two definitive purchase and capital plans included in this quarterly report may not accurately reflect its operations, properties and capital plans followingsale agreements for the Chapter 11 process.
Ability to Continue as a Going Concern
Continued low commodity prices have resulted in significantly lower levels of cash flow from operating activities and have limited the Company’s ability to access the capital markets. In addition, each of the Company’s Credit Facilities is subject to scheduled redeterminationssales of its borrowing base, semi-annuallyinterest in Aprilcertain properties located in south Texas. On August 1, 2017, and October, based primarily on reserve reports using lender commodity price expectations at such time. July 31, 2017, the Company completed the sales and received cash proceeds of approximately $9 million and approximately $23 million, respectively.
The lenders underCompany entered into two definitive purchase and sale agreements for the Credit Facilities agreed to defer the April 2016 borrowing base redeterminations to May 11, 2016. Continued low commodity prices, reductionssales of undeveloped acreage located in the Company’s capital budgetPermian Basin. On July 28, 2017, the Company completed the sale of undeveloped acreage located in Lea and Eddy counties in New Mexico and received cash proceeds of approximately $21 million. On May 9, 2017, the resulting reserve write-downs, along withCompany completed the terminationsale of undeveloped acreage located in Ward County, Texas and received cash proceeds of approximately $4 million.
On July 31, 2017, the Company’s hedges, were expected to adversely impact upcoming redeterminations and have a significant negative impact onCompany completed the Company’s liquidity. The Company’s filingsale of the Bankruptcy Petitions constituted an event of default that accelerated the Company’s obligations under its Credit Facilities, its Second Lien Notes and its senior notes.
The significant risks and uncertainties related to the Company’s liquidity and Chapter 11 proceedings described above raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. The condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis of accounting, which contemplates continuity of operations, realization of assets, and satisfaction of liabilities and commitmentsinterest in properties located in the normal courseSan Joaquin Basin in California to Berry Petroleum Company, LLC (the “San Joaquin Basin Sale”) and received cash proceeds of business. The condensed consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of the going concern uncertainty. If the Company cannot continue as a going concern, adjustments to the carrying values and classification of its assets and liabilities and the reported amounts of income and expenses could be required and could be material.
In order to decrease the Company’s level of indebtedness and maintain the Company’s liquidity at levels sufficient to meet its commitments, the Company undertook a number of actions, including minimizing capital expenditures and further reducing its recurring operating expenses. Despite taking these actions, the Company did not have sufficient liquidity to satisfy its debt service obligations, meet other financial obligations and comply with its debt covenants. As a result, the Debtors filed Bankruptcy Petitions for relief under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code.approximately $257 million.

41

Item 2.Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Continued

Covenant ViolationsOn July 21, 2017, the Company completed the sale of its interest in properties located in the Los Angeles Basin in California to Bridge Energy LLC (the “Los Angeles Basin Sale”) and received cash proceeds of approximately $94 million. The Company will receive an additional $7 million contingent payment if certain operational requirements are satisfied within one year.
On June 30, 2017, the Company completed the sale of its interest in properties located in the Salt Creek Field in Wyoming to Denbury Resources Inc. (the “Salt Creek Assets Sale”). Cash proceeds received from the sale of these properties were approximately $76 million and the Company recognized a net gain of approximately $22 million.
On May 31, 2017, the Company completed the sale of its interest in properties located in western Wyoming to Jonah Energy LLC (the “Jonah Assets Sale”). Cash proceeds received from the sale of these properties were approximately $560 million, net of costs to sell of approximately $6 million, and the Company recognized a net gain of approximately $279 million.
As a result of the Company’s strategic exit from California (completed by the San Joaquin Basin Sale and Los Angeles Basin Sale), the Company classified the assets and liabilities, results of operations and cash flows of its California properties as discontinued operations on its condensed consolidated financial statements.
The Company’s filing ofCompany continues to market the Bankruptcy Petitions constituted an event of default that acceleratedpreviously announced non-core assets located in the Company’s obligations under its Credit Facilities, its Second Lien NotesPermian Basin, the Williston Basin and its senior notes. Additionally, other events of default, including cross-defaults, are present, includingsouth Texas.
Joint Venture – Pending
On June 27, 2017, the failure to make interest payments on the Company’s Second Lien Notes andCompany, through certain of its senior notes, as well as the receipt ofwholly owned subsidiaries, entered into an agreement with Citizen Energy II, LLC (“Citizen”) in which LINN Energy and Citizen will each contribute certain upstream assets located in Oklahoma to a going concern explanatory paragraph from the Company’s independent registered public accounting firmnewly formed company, Roan Resources LLC (“Roan”), focused on the Company’s consolidated financial statementsaccelerated development of the Merge/SCOOP/STACK play in the Mid-Continent region. In exchange for their respective contributions, LINN Energy and Citizen will equally split the year ended December 31, 2015. Underequity interest in Roan. The transaction is anticipated to close in the Bankruptcy Code,third quarter of 2017, subject to closing conditions. There can be no assurance that all of the creditors under these debt agreements are stayed from taking any action againstconditions to closing will be satisfied.
Construction of Cryogenic Plant
In July 2017 the Company asrenamed its wholly owned subsidiary LINN Midstream, LLC to Blue Mountain Midstream LLC (“Blue Mountain”) and entered into a resultdefinitive agreement with BCCK Engineering, Inc. (“BCCK”) to construct the Chisholm Trail Cryogenic Gas Plant. Blue Mountain’s assets include the Chisholm Trail midstream business (“Chisholm Trail”) located in Oklahoma. Chisholm Trail is located in the Merge/SCOOP/STACK play in the Mid-Continent region and has approximately 30 miles of an eventexisting natural gas gathering pipeline and approximately 60 MMcf/d of default. See Note 6 for additional details aboutcurrent refrigeration capacity. Infrastructure expansions are underway to add 35 miles of low pressure gathering, increase compression throughput and construct a new cryogenic plant to improve liquids recoveries. Blue Mountain has entered into a definitive agreement with BCCK to construct a 225 MMcf/d cryogenic natural gas processing facility with a total capacity of 250 MMcf/d. Construction is underway and it is expected to be commissioned during the Company’s debt.second quarter of 2018.
Credit Facilities2017 Oil and Natural Gas Capital Budget
The Company’s Credit Facilities contain a requirementFor 2017, the Company estimates its total capital expenditures, excluding acquisitions, will be approximately $338 million, including approximately $229 million related to deliver audited consolidated financial statements without a going concern or like qualification or exception. Consequently, the filing of the Company’s 2015 Annual Report on Form 10-K which included such explanatory paragraph resulted in a defaultits oil and natural gas capital program and approximately $100 million related to its plant and pipeline capital. This estimate is under the LINN Credit Facility as of the filing date, March 15, 2016,continuous review and subject to a 30 day grace period.ongoing adjustments.
Financing Activities
Successor Credit Facility
On April 12, 2016, the Company entered into amendments to both the LINN Credit Facility and Berry Credit Facility. The amendments provided for, among other things, an agreement that (i) certain events (the “Specified Events”) would not become defaults or events of default until May 11, 2016, (ii) the borrowing bases would remain constant until May 11, 2016, unless reduced as a result of swap agreement terminations or collateral sales and (iii) the Company, the administrative agent and the lenders would negotiate in good faith the terms of a restructuring support agreement in furtherance of a restructuring of the capital structure of the Company and its subsidiaries. In addition, the amendment to the Berry Credit Facility provided Berry with access to previously restricted cash of $45 million in order to fund ordinary course operations.
Pursuant to the amendments, the Specified Events consisted of:
The receipt of a going concern qualification or explanatory statement in the auditors’ report on the Company’s consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2015;
The receipt of a going concern qualification or explanatory statement in the auditors’ report on Berry’s financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2015;
The failure of the Company or Berry to make certain interest payments on their unsecured notes;
Any cross-defaults that may arise on account of any of the foregoing, provided that no event of default is continuing under any document giving rise to such cross default; and
Any failure to provide notice of any of the events described above.
The Specified Events listed in the amendment to the Berry Credit Facility also included the failure to maintain the ratio of Adjusted EBITDAX to Interest Expense (as each term is defined in the Berry Credit Facility) (“Interest Coverage Ratio”).
As a condition to closing the amendments, in April 2016, (a) the Company made a $100 million permanent repayment of a portion of the borrowings outstanding under the LINN Credit Facility and (b) the Company and certain of its subsidiaries provided control agreements over certain deposit accounts.
PursuantEffective Date, pursuant to the terms of the amendment toPlan, the LINNCompany entered into the Successor Credit Facility with Holdco II as borrower and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as administrative agent, providing for: 1) a resultreserve-based revolving loan with an initial borrowing base of the execution$1.4 billion and 2) a term loan in an original principal amount of the Restructuring Support Agreement, in May 2016, the Company made a $350 million permanent repayment of a portion of the borrowings outstanding under the LINN Credit Facility.
The filing of the Bankruptcy Petitions constituted an event of default that accelerated the Company’s obligations under the Credit Facilities. However, under the Bankruptcy Code, the creditors under these debt agreements are stayed from taking any action against the Company as a result of the default.
Second Lien Notes
The indenture governing the Second Lien Notes (“Second Lien Indenture”) required the Company to deliver mortgages by February 18, 2016, subject to a 45 day grace period. The Company elected to exercise its right to the grace period, which resulted in the Company being in default under the Second Lien Indenture.$300 million.

42

Item 2.Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Continued

On April 4, 2016,May 31, 2017, the Company entered into a settlement agreement with certain holders of the Second Lien NotesFirst Amendment and agreedConsent to deliver, and make arrangements for recordation of, the mortgages. The Company has since delivered and made arrangements for recordation of the mortgages.
The settlement agreement required the partiesCredit Agreement, pursuant to commence good faith negotiations with each other regarding the terms of a potential comprehensive and consensual restructuring, including a potential restructuring under a Chapter 11 plan of reorganization. The settlement agreement provided that in the event the parties were unable to reach agreement on the terms of a consensual restructuring on or before the commencement of such Chapter 11 proceedings (or such later date as mutually agreed to by the parties), the parties would support entry by the Bankruptcy Court of a settlement order that,which among other things, (i) approvesmodifications: 1) the issuanceterm loan was paid in full and terminated using cash proceeds from the Jonah Assets Sale, and 2) the borrowing base for the revolving loan was reduced to $1 billion. As of additional notes, in the principal amount of $1.0 billion plus certain accrued interest, on a proportionate basis to existing holders of the Second Lien Notes and (ii) releases the mortgages and other collateral upon the issuance of the additional notes (the “Settlement Order”).
The settlement agreement will terminate upon, among other events, entry by the Bankruptcy Court of a final, non-appealable order denying the Company’s motion seeking entry of the Settlement Order.
The Company failed to make an interest payment of approximately $68 million due June 15, 2016, on the Second Lien Notes.
The filing of the Bankruptcy Petitions constituted an event of default that accelerated the Company’s obligations under the Second Lien Indenture. However, under the Bankruptcy Code, holders of the Second Lien Notes are stayed from taking any action against the Company as a result of the default.
Senior Notes
The Company deferred making interest payments totaling approximately $60 million due March 15, 2016, including approximately $30 million on LINN Energy’s 7.75% senior notes due February 2021, approximately $12 million on LINN Energy’s 6.50% senior notes due September 2021 and approximately $18 million on Berry’s 6.375% senior notes due September 2022, which resulted in the Company being in default under these senior notes. The indentures governing each of the applicable series of notes provided the Company a 30, day grace period to make the interest payments.
On April 14, 2016, within the 30 day interest payment grace period provided for in the indentures governing the notes, the Company and Berry made interest payments of approximately $60 million in satisfaction of their respective obligations.
The Company failed to make an interest payment of approximately $31 million due April 15, 2016, on LINN Energy’s 8.625% senior notes due April 2020, interest payments due May 1, 2016, of approximately $18 million on LINN Energy’s 6.25% senior notes due November 2019 and approximately $9 million on Berry’s 6.75% senior notes due November 2020, and an interest payment of approximately $18 million due May 15, 2016, on LINN Energy’s 6.50% senior notes due May 2019.
The filing of the Bankruptcy Petitions constituted an event of default that accelerated the Company’s obligations under the indentures governing the senior notes. However, under the Bankruptcy Code, holders of the senior notes are stayed from taking any action against the Company as a result of the default.
Commodity Derivatives
In April 2016 and May 2016, in connection with the Company’s restructuring efforts, LINN Energy canceled (prior to the contract settlement dates) all of its derivative contracts for net proceeds of approximately $1.2 billion. The net proceeds were used to make permanent repayments of a portion of the2017, total borrowings outstanding under the LINNSuccessor Credit Facility. Also, in May 2016, asFacility were approximately $183 million and there was approximately $774 million of remaining available borrowing capacity (which includes a result$7 million reduction for outstanding letters of credit). The maturity date is February 27, 2021.
Redetermination of the Chapter 11 proceedings, Berry’s counterparties canceled (priorborrowing base under the Successor Credit Facility, based primarily on reserve reports using lender commodity price expectations at such time, occurs semi-annually, in April and October. The next scheduled borrowing base redetermination is to occur on October 1, 2017. At the contract settlement dates) allCompany’s election, interest on borrowings under the Successor Credit Facility is determined by reference to either the London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) plus an applicable margin of Berry’s derivative contracts (with3.50% per annum or the exceptionalternate base rate (“ABR”) plus an applicable margin of a contract consisting of 1,840 MMMBtu of natural gas basis swaps2.50% per annum. Interest is generally payable in arrears monthly for 2016) for net proceeds of approximately $2 million. The net proceeds were used to make permanent repayments of a portionloans bearing interest based at the ABR and at the end of the borrowings outstanding underapplicable interest period for loans bearing interest at the Berry Credit Facility. In July 2016, Berry’s remaining derivative contract was canceled by the counterparty.

43

Item 2.Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Continued

Offer to Exchange LINN Energy Units for LinnCo Shares
In March 2016, LinnCo filed a Registration Statement on Form S-4 related to an offer to exchange each outstanding unit representing limited liability company interests of LINN Energy for one common share representing limited liability company interests of LinnCo. The initial offer expired on April 25, 2016, and on April 26, 2016, LinnCo commenced a subsequent offering period that expired on August 1, 2016. Through June 30, 2016, 115,702,524 LINN Energy units were exchanged for an equal number of LinnCo shares. As a result of the exchanges of LINN Energy units for LinnCo shares, LinnCo’s ownership of LINN Energy’s outstanding units increased from approximately 36% at March 31, 2016, to approximately 69% at June 30, 2016.
2016 Oil and Natural Gas Capital Budget
For 2016, the Company estimates its total capital expenditures, excluding acquisitions, will be approximately $235 million, including approximately $160 million related to its oil and natural gas capital program and approximately $60 million related to its plant and pipeline capital. The 2016 budget contemplates continued low commodity prices and is under continuous review and subject to ongoing adjustments.LIBOR. The Company expectsis required to fund its capital expenditures primarily from net cash provided by operating activities; however, there is uncertainty regarding the Company’s liquidity as discussed above. In addition, at this level of capital spending, the Company expects its total reserves to decline.
Financing Activities
See above forpay a description of the amendments to the Credit Facilities entered into in April 2016. During the six months ended June 30, 2016, the Company borrowed approximately $979 million under the LINN Credit Facility and made repayments of approximately $1.8 billion of a portion of the borrowings outstanding under the Credit Facilities and term loan. The repayments include approximately $841 million in commodity derivative settlements paid by the counterpartiescommitment fee to the lenders under the LINNSuccessor Credit Facility. AsFacility, which accrues at a rate per annum of June 30, 2016, total0.50% on the average daily unused amount of the available revolving loan commitments of the lenders.
Holdco II has the right to prepay any borrowings outstanding (including outstanding letters of credit) under the LINNSuccessor Credit Facility and Berryat any time without a prepayment penalty, other than customary “breakage” costs with respect to LIBOR loans.
The obligations under the Successor Credit Facility wereare secured by mortgages covering approximately $1.9 billion and $898 million, respectively, with no remaining availability for either.
Delisting from Stock Exchange
As a result95% of the Company’s failuretotal value of the proved reserves of the oil and natural gas properties of the Company, and certain equipment and facilities associated therewith, along with liens on substantially all personal property of the Company and are guaranteed by the Company, Linn Energy Holdco LLC and Holdco II’s subsidiaries, subject to customary exceptions. Under the Successor Credit Facility, the Company is required to maintain certain financial covenants including the maintenance of (i) a reserve coverage ratio of at least 1.1 to 1.0, tested on (a) the date of each scheduled borrowing base redetermination and (b) the date of each additional borrowing base redetermination done in conjunction with an asset sale, (ii) a maximum total net debt to last twelve months EBITDAX ratio of 4.0 to 1.0 beginning with the quarter ending September 30, 2017, and (iii) a minimum current ratio of 1.0 to 1.0 beginning with the quarter ending September 30, 2017.
The Successor Credit Facility also contains customary affirmative and negative covenants, including as to compliance with laws (including environmental laws, ERISA and anti-corruption laws), maintenance of required insurance, delivery of quarterly and annual financial statements, oil and natural gas engineering reports and budgets, maintenance and operation of property (including oil and natural gas properties), restrictions on the incurrence of liens and indebtedness, mergers, consolidations and sales of assets, transactions with affiliates and other customary covenants.
The Successor Credit Facility contains customary events of default and remedies for credit facilities of this nature. Failure to comply with the NASDAQ Global Select Market (“NASDAQ”) continued listing requirements, on May 24, 2016,financial and other covenants in the Successor Credit Facility would allow the lenders, subject to customary cure rights, to require immediate payment of all amounts outstanding under the Successor Credit Facility.
Share Repurchase Program
On June 1, 2017, the Company’s Board of Directors announced that it had authorized the repurchase of up to $75 million of the Company’s outstanding shares of Class A common stock. On June 28, 2017, the Company’s Board of Directors announced that it had authorized an increase in the previously announced share repurchase program to up to a total of $200 million of the Company’s outstanding shares of Class A common stock. In June 2017 and July 2017, the Company repurchased an aggregate of 841,303 shares of Class A common stock at an average price of $32.41 per share for a total cost of approximately $27 million.
Listing on the OTCQB Market
On the Effective Date, the Predecessor’s units began trading over the counterwere canceled and ceased to trade on the OTC Markets Group Inc.’s Pink marketplacemarketplace. In April 2017, the Successor’s Class A common stock was approved for trading on the OTCQB market under the trading symbol “LINEQ.“LNGG.

4443

Item 2.Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Continued

Results of Operations
Three Months Ended June 30, 2016,2017, Compared to Three Months Ended June 30, 20152016
Three Months Ended
June 30,
  Successor  Predecessor  
2016 2015 Variance
Three Months Ended June 30,
2017
  
Three Months Ended June 30,
2016
 Variance
(in thousands)
(in thousands)      
Revenues and other:           
Natural gas sales$95,380
 $149,908
 $(54,528)$110,481
  $82,718
 $27,763
Oil sales182,902
 310,454
 (127,552)89,237
  81,499
 7,738
NGL sales37,975
 36,057
 1,918
43,449
  31,630
 11,819
Total oil, natural gas and NGL sales316,257
 496,419
 (180,162)243,167
  195,847
 47,320
Losses on oil and natural gas derivatives(182,768) (191,188) 8,420
Gains (losses) on oil and natural gas derivatives45,714
  (183,794) 229,508
Marketing and other revenues(1)21,906
 16,597
 5,309
18,938
  32,192
 (13,254)
155,395
 321,828
 (166,433)307,819
  44,245
 263,574
Expenses:           
Lease operating expenses115,543
 140,652
 (25,109)71,057
  70,367
 690
Transportation expenses52,037
 55,795
 (3,758)37,388
  41,092
 (3,704)
Marketing expenses11,305
 9,159
 2,146
6,976
  6,727
 249
General and administrative expenses (1)(2)
59,646
 98,650
 (39,004)34,458
  52,169
 (17,711)
Exploration costs48
 564
 (516)811
  48
 763
Depreciation, depletion and amortization143,171
 215,732
 (72,561)51,987
  86,358
 (34,371)
Taxes, other than income taxes30,847
 58,034
 (27,187)17,871
  18,180
 (309)
(Gains) losses on sale of assets and other, net2,942
 (17,996) 20,938
(306,969)  2,517
 (309,486)
415,539
 560,590
 (145,051)(86,421)  277,458
 (363,879)
Other income and (expenses)(69,736) (143,095) 73,359
(8,714)  (51,546) 42,832
Reorganization items, net534,884
 
 534,884
(3,377)  485,798
 (489,175)
Income (loss) before income taxes205,004
 (381,857) 586,861
Income tax benefit(3,488) (2,730) (758)
Net income (loss)$208,492
 $(379,127) $587,619
Income from continuing operations before income taxes382,149
  201,039
 181,110
Income tax expense (benefit)158,770
  (3,652) 162,422
Income from continuing operations223,379
  204,691
 18,688
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of income taxes(3,322)  3,801
 (7,123)
Net income$220,057
  $208,492
 $11,565
(1)
Marketing and other revenues for the three months ended June 30, 2016, include approximately $18 million of management fee revenues recognized by the Company from Berry. Management fee revenues are included in “other revenues” on the condensed consolidated statement of operations.
(2) 
General and administrative expenses for the three months ended June 30, 2016,2017, and June 30, 2015,2016, include approximately $5$15 million and $11$5 million, respectively, of noncash unit-basedshare-based compensation expenses. In addition, general and administrative expenses for the three months ended June 30, 2016, include expenses incurred by LINN Energy associated with the operations of Berry. On February 28, 2017, LINN Energy and Berry emerged from Bankruptcy as stand-alone, unaffiliated entities.

4544

Table of Contents
Item 2.Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Continued

Three Months Ended
June 30,
  Successor  Predecessor  
2016 2015 Variance
Three Months Ended June 30,
2017
  
Three Months Ended June 30,
2016
 Variance
Average daily production:           
Natural gas (MMcf/d)588
 666
 (12)%432
  511
 (15)%
Oil (MBbls/d)51.1
 64.8
 (21)%21.6
  21.9
 (1)%
NGL (MBbls/d)30.8
 27.4
 12 %24.8
  26.6
 (7)%
Total (MMcfe/d)1,079
 1,219
 (11)%710
  802
 (11)%
           
Weighted average prices: (1)
           
Natural gas (Mcf)$1.78
 $2.47
 (28)%$2.81
  $1.78
 58 %
Oil (Bbl)$39.37
 $52.65
 (25)%$45.42
  $40.96
 11 %
NGL (Bbl)$13.54
 $14.44
 (6)%$19.29
  $13.08
 47 %
           
Average NYMEX prices:           
Natural gas (MMBtu)$1.95
 $2.64
 (26)%$3.18
  $1.95
 63 %
Oil (Bbl)$45.59
 $57.94
 (21)%$48.28
  $45.59
 6 %
           
Costs per Mcfe of production:           
Lease operating expenses$1.18
 $1.27
 (7)%$1.10
  $0.96
 15 %
Transportation expenses$0.53
 $0.50
 6 %$0.58
  $0.56
 4 %
General and administrative expenses (2)
$0.61
 $0.89
 (31)%$0.53
  $0.71
 (25)%
Depreciation, depletion and amortization$1.46
 $1.94
 (25)%$0.80
  $1.18
 (32)%
Taxes, other than income taxes$0.31
 $0.52
 (40)%$0.28
  $0.25
 12 %
      
Average daily production – discontinued operations:      
Total (MMcfe/d)29
  277
 

(1) 
Does not include the effect of gains (losses) on derivatives.
(2) 
General and administrative expenses for the three months ended June 30, 2016,2017, and June 30, 2015,2016, include approximately $5$15 million and $11$5 million, respectively, of noncash unit-basedshare-based compensation expenses. In addition, general and administrative expenses for the three months ended June 30, 2016, include expenses incurred by LINN Energy associated with the operations of Berry. On February 28, 2017, LINN Energy and Berry emerged from Bankruptcy as stand-alone, unaffiliated entities.

4645

Table of Contents
Item 2.Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Continued

Revenues and Other
Oil, Natural Gas and NGL Sales
Oil, natural gas and NGL sales decreasedincreased by approximately $180$47 million or 36%24% to approximately $316$243 million for the three months ended June 30, 2017, from approximately $196 million for the three months ended June 30, 2016, from approximately $496 million for the three months ended June 30, 2015, due to lower oil,higher natural gas, NGL and NGLoil prices, andpartially offset by lower production volumes. Lower oil,Higher natural gas, NGL and NGLoil prices resulted in a decreasean increase in revenues of approximately $62$40 million, $37$14 million and $3$9 million, respectively.
Average daily production volumes decreased to approximately 1,079710 MMcfe/d for the three months ended June 30, 2016,2017, from 1,219802 MMcfe/d for the three months ended June 30, 2015.2016. Lower oilnatural gas, NGL and natural gasoil production volumes resulted in a decrease in revenues of approximately $65$13 million, $2 million and $17$1 million, respectively. Higher NGL production volumes resulted in an increase in revenues of approximately $4 million.
The following table sets forth average daily production by region:
Three Months Ended
June 30,
    Successor  Predecessor    
2016 2015 Variance
Three Months Ended June 30,
2017
  
Three Months Ended June 30,
2016
 Variance
Average daily production (MMcfe/d):               
Rockies384
 445
 (61) (14)%244
  330
 (86) (26)%
Hugoton Basin238
 255
 (17) (6)%165
  181
 (16) (9)%
California158
 187
 (29) (16)%
Mid-Continent102
 100
 2
 2 %125
  102
 23
 23 %
TexLa79
 80
 (1) (1)%76
  71
 5
 8 %
Permian Basin58
 85
 (27) (32)%46
  58
 (12) (21)%
Michigan/Illinois31
 31
 
 
29
  31
 (2) (6)%
South Texas29
 36
 (7) (20)%25
  29
 (4) (13)%
1,079
 1,219
 (140) (11)%710
  802
 (92) (11)%
The increases in average daily production volumes in the Mid-Continent and TexLa primarily reflect increased development capital spending in the regions. The decreases in average daily production volumes in the remaining regions primarily reflect lower production volumes as a result of reduced development capital spending throughout the Company’s various operating regions, as well as marginal well shut-ins, driven by continued low commodity prices. The decrease in average daily production volumes in California also reflects operational challenges in the Company’s Diatomite development program, where the Company is pursuing various remedies to address wells performance and has temporarily curtailed capital spending in this program. The decrease in average daily production volumes in the Permian BasinRockies region also reflects lower production volumes as a result of the Howard County assets saleJonah Assets Sale on AugustMay 31, 2015.2017.
LossesGains (Losses) on Oil and Natural Gas Derivatives
LossesGains on oil and natural gas derivatives were approximately $183$46 million and $191for the three months ended June 30, 2017, compared to losses of approximately $184 million for the three months ended June 30, 2016, and June 30, 2015, respectively, representing a decreasevariance of approximately $8$230 million. LossesGains and losses on oil and natural gas derivatives decreasedwere primarily due to changes in fair value of the derivative contracts, and the comparison from period to period was impacted by the declining maturity schedule of the Company’s hedges.contracts. The fair value on unsettled derivative contracts changes as future commodity price expectations change compared to the contract prices on the derivatives. If the expected future commodity prices increase compared to the contract prices on the derivatives, losses are recognized; and if the expected future commodity prices decrease compared to the contract prices on the derivatives, gains are recognized.
See above under “Executive Overview” for details about the Company’s commodity derivative cancellations in April 2016 and May 2016.

47

Table of Contents
Item 2.Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Continued

The Company determines the fair value of its oil and natural gas derivatives utilizing pricing models that use a variety of techniques, including market quotes and pricing analysis. See Item 3. “Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk” and Note 7 and Note 8 for additional details about the Company’s commodity derivatives. For information about the Company’s credit risk related to derivative contracts, see “Counterparty Credit Risk” under “Liquidity and Capital Resources” below.
Marketing and Other Revenues
Marketing revenues represent third-party activities associated with company-owned gathering systems, plants and facilities. Other revenues primarily include management fee revenues recognized by the Company from Berry (in the Predecessor period)

46

Table of Contents
Item 2.Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Continued

and helium sales revenue. Marketing and other revenues increaseddecreased by approximately $5$13 million or 32%41% to approximately $22$19 million for the three months ended June 30, 2016,2017, from approximately $17$32 million for the three months ended June 30, 2015.2016. The increasedecrease was primarily due to the management fee revenues from Berry included in the Predecessor period, partially offset by higher revenues generated by the Jayhawk natural gas processing plant in Kansas and higher helium sales revenue in the Hugoton Basin, partially offset by lower electricity sales revenues generated by the Company’s California cogeneration facilities.Basin.
Expenses
Lease Operating Expenses
Lease operating expenses include expenses such as labor, field office, vehicle, supervision, maintenance, tools and supplies, and workover expenses. Lease operating expenses decreased byremained relatively consistent at approximately $25 million or 18% to approximately $116$71 million for the three months ended June 30, 2016, from2017, compared to approximately $141$70 million for the three months ended June 30, 2015. The decrease was primarily due to cost savings initiatives and lower workover activities, as well as a decrease in steam costs caused by lower prices for natural gas used in steam generation and a decrease in steam injection volumes.2016. Lease operating expenses per Mcfe also decreasedincreased to $1.18$1.10 per Mcfe for the three months ended June 30, 2016,2017, from $1.27$0.96 per Mcfe for the three months ended June 30, 2015.2016.
Transportation Expenses
Transportation expenses decreased by approximately $4 million or 7%9% to approximately $52$37 million for the three months ended June 30, 2016,2017, from approximately $56$41 million for the three months ended June 30, 2015.2016. The decrease was primarily due to lower production volumes and reduced costs as a result of certain contracts terminatedlower production volumes and as a result of the properties sold in the Chapter 11 proceedings, partially offset by higher costs from nonoperated properties in the Rockies region.May 2017. Transportation expenses per Mcfe increased to $0.53$0.58 per Mcfe for the three months ended June 30, 2016,2017, from $0.50$0.56 per Mcfe for the three months ended June 30, 2015.2016.
Marketing Expenses
Marketing expenses represent third-party activities associated with company-owned gathering systems, plants and facilities. Marketing expenses increased byremained relatively consistent at approximately $2$7 million or 23% to approximately $11 million for each of the three months ended June 30, 2016, from approximately $9 million for the three months ended2017, and June 30, 2015. The increase was primarily due to higher expenses associated with the Jayhawk natural gas processing plant in Kansas.2016.
General and Administrative Expenses
General and administrative expenses are costs not directly associated with field operations and reflect the costs of employees including executive officers, related benefits, office leases and professional fees. In addition, general and administrative expenses in the Predecessor period includes expenses incurred by LINN Energy associated with the operations of Berry. General and administrative expenses decreased by approximately $39$18 million or 40%34% to approximately $60$34 million for the three months ended June 30, 2016,2017, from approximately $99$52 million for the three months ended June 30, 2015.2016. The decrease was primarily due to lower professional services expenses, lower salaries and benefits related expenses, the costs associated with the operations of Berry in the Predecessor period and lower acquisition expenses. General andvarious other administrative expenses for the three months ended June 30, 2015, was impactedincluding insurance and rent, partially offset by advisory fees related to alliance agreements entered into with certain private capital investors.higher noncash share-based compensation expenses and higher professional services expenses. General and administrative expenses per Mcfe also decreased to $0.61$0.53 per Mcfe for the three months ended June 30, 2016,2017, from $0.89$0.71 per Mcfe for the three months ended June 30, 2015.2016.
ProfessionalFor the professional services expenses of approximately $21 million for the three months ended June 30, 2016, related to the Chapter 11 proceedings that were incurred since the Petition Date, have been recorded in “reorganization items, net” onsee “Reorganization Items, Net.”
Exploration Costs
Exploration costs increased by approximately $763,000 to approximately $811,000 for the condensed consolidated statementsthree months ended June 30, 2017, from approximately $48,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2016. The increase was primarily due to higher seismic data expenses.
Depreciation, Depletion and Amortization
Depreciation, depletion and amortization decreased by approximately $34 million or 40% to approximately $52 million for the three months ended June 30, 2017, from approximately $86 million for the three months ended June 30, 2016. The decrease was primarily due to lower rates as a result of operations.the application of fresh start accounting, as well as lower total production volumes. Depreciation, depletion and amortization per Mcfe also decreased to $0.80 per Mcfe for the three months ended June 30, 2017, from $1.18 per Mcfe for the three months ended June 30, 2016.

4847

Table of Contents
Item 2.Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Continued

Exploration Costs
Exploration costs decreased by approximately $516,000 to approximately $48,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2016, from approximately $564,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2015. The decrease was primarily due to lower leasehold impairment expenses on unproved properties.
Depreciation, Depletion and Amortization
Depreciation, depletion and amortization decreased by approximately $73 million or 34% to approximately $143 million for the three months ended June 30, 2016, from approximately $216 million for the three months ended June 30, 2015. The decrease was primarily due to lower rates as a result of the impairments recorded in the prior year and the first quarter of 2016, as well as lower total production volumes. Depreciation, depletion and amortization per Mcfe also decreased to $1.46 per Mcfe for the three months ended June 30, 2016, from $1.94 per Mcfe for the three months ended June 30, 2015.
Taxes, Other Than Income Taxes
Three Months Ended
June 30,
  Successor  Predecessor  
2016 2015 Variance
Three Months Ended June 30,
2017
  
Three Months Ended June 30,
2016
 Variance
(in thousands)
     
(in thousands)      
Severance taxes$9,749
 $20,676
 $(10,927)$10,669
  $10,208
 $461
Ad valorem taxes16,595
 31,780
 (15,185)6,933
  6,991
 (58)
California carbon allowances3,428
 5,548
 (2,120)
Other1,075
 30
 1,045
269
  981
 (712)
$30,847
 $58,034
 $(27,187)$17,871
  $18,180
 $(309)
Taxes, other than income taxes decreased by approximately $27 million$309,000 or 47%2% for the three months ended June 30, 2016,2017, compared to the three months ended June 30, 2015.2016. Severance taxes, which are a function of revenues generated from production, decreasedincreased primarily due to lower oil, natural gas and NGLhigher commodity prices andpartially offset by lower production volumes. Ad valorem taxes, which are based on the value of reserves and production equipment and vary by location, decreased primarily due to lower estimated valuations on certain of the Company’s properties. California carbon allowances decreased primarily due
(Gains) Losses on Sale of Assets and Other, Net
During the three months ended June 30, 2017, the Company recorded the following net gains on divestitures (see Note 4):
Net gain of approximately $22 million on the Salt Creek Assets Sale; and
Net gain of approximately $279 million, including costs to lower anticipated emissions compliance obligations as a resultsell of reduced capital spending levels and a decrease in steam injection volumes.approximately $6 million, on the Jonah Assets Sale.
Other Income and (Expenses)
Three Months Ended
June 30,
  Successor  Predecessor  
2016 2015 Variance
Three Months Ended June 30,
2017
  
Three Months Ended June 30,
2016
 Variance
(in thousands)
     
(in thousands)      
Interest expense, net of amounts capitalized$(68,434) $(146,100) $77,666
$(7,551)  $(50,320) $42,769
Gain on extinguishment of debt
 9,151
 (9,151)
Other, net(1,302) (6,146) 4,844
(1,163)  (1,226) 63
$(69,736) $(143,095) $73,359
$(8,714)  $(51,546) $42,832
Other income and (expenses) decreased by approximately $73$43 million or 83% for the three months ended June 30, 2016,2017, compared to the three months ended June 30, 2015.2016. Interest expense decreased primarily due to lower outstanding debt during the period principally as a result of the senior notes repurchased and exchanged during 2015, discontinuation of interest expense recognition on the senior notes for the period from May 12, 2016 through June 30, 2016, as a result of the Chapter 11 proceedings and lower amortization of discounts and financing fees.period. For the period from May 12, 2016 through June 30, 2016, contractual interest, which was not recorded, on the senior notes was approximately $38$31 million. For the three months ended June 30, 2015, the Company recorded a gain on extinguishment of debt of approximately $9 million as a result of the repurchases of a portion of its senior notes. Other expenses decreased primarily due to lower write-offs of deferred financing

49

Table of Contents
Item 2.Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Continued

fees related to the Credit Facilities and lower bank fees. See “Debt” under “Liquidity and Capital Resources” below for additional details.
The $1.0 billion in aggregate principal amount of Second Lien Notes issued in November 2015 were accounted for as a troubled debt restructuring which requires that interest payments on the Second Lien Notes reduce the carrying value of the debt with no interest expense recognized. As a result ofFor the Chapter 11 proceedings, the Company did not make theperiod from May 12, 2016 through June 30, 2016, contractual interest, payment ofwhich was not recorded, on the Second Lien Notes was approximately $68 million due in June 2016, including approximately $25 million related to the three months ended June 30, 2016.$16 million.
Reorganization Items, Net
The Company has incurred and is expected to continue to incur significant costs and recognized significant gains associated with the reorganization. These costs, which are expensed as incurred, are expected to significantly affect the Company’s results of operations. Reorganization items represent costs and income directly associated with the Chapter 11 proceedings since the Petition Date, and also include adjustments to reflect the carrying value of certain liabilities subject to compromise at their estimated allowed claim amounts,

48

Table of Contents
Item 2.Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Continued

as such adjustments are determined.
The following table summarizes the components of reorganization items included on the condensed consolidated statementstatements of operations:
Three Months Ended June 30, 2016Successor  Predecessor
(in thousands)
Three Months Ended June 30,
2017
  
Three Months Ended June 30,
2016
 
(in thousands)    
Legal and other professional advisory fees$(20,510)$(3,446)  $(13,451)
Unamortized deferred financing fees, discounts and premiums(41,122)
  (52,045)
Gain related to interest payable on the 12.00% senior secured second lien notes due December 2020 (1)
551,000
Terminated contracts45,109
Gain related to interest payable on Predecessor’s Second Lien Notes
  551,000
Other407
69
  294
Reorganization items, net$534,884
$(3,377)  $485,798
(1)
Represents a noncash gain on the write-off of postpetition contractual interest through maturity, recorded to reflect the carrying value of the liability subject to compromise at its estimated allowed claim amount.
Income Tax BenefitExpense (Benefit)
The Company isEffective February 28, 2017, upon the consummation of the Plan, the Successor became a C corporation. Prior to the consummation of the Plan, the Predecessor was a limited liability company treated as a partnership for federal and state income tax purposes, with the exception of the state of Texas, in which income tax liabilities and/or benefits arewere passed through to its unitholders. Limited liability companies are subject to Texas margin tax. In addition, certain of the Company’sPredecessor’s subsidiaries are Subchapter C-corporationswere C corporations subject to federal and state income taxes. The Company recognized income tax expense of approximately $159 million and an income tax benefit of approximately $3$4 million for both the three months ended June 30, 2016,2017, and June 30, 2015, based on2016, respectively.
Income (Loss) from Discontinued Operations, Net of Income Taxes
As a result of the Company’s strategic exit from California (completed by the San Joaquin Basin Sale and Los Angeles Basin Sale) and the deconsolidation of Berry, the Company has classified the results of operations of its California properties and Berry as discontinued operations. Loss from discontinued operations, net of income taxes was approximately $3 million and income from discontinued operations was approximately $4 million for the Company’s taxable subsidiaries during the respective period.three months ended June 30, 2017, and June 30, 2016, respectively. See Note 4 for additional information.
Net Income (Loss)
Net income wasincreased by approximately $12 million to approximately $220 million for the three months ended June 30, 2017, from approximately $208 million for the three months ended June 30, 2016,2016. The increase was primarily due gains on sales of assets, gains compared to a net loss of approximately $379 million forlosses on commodity derivatives, lower expenses and higher production revenues partially offset by gains included in reorganization items during the three months ended June 30, 2015. The increase in net2016, income was primarily duetax expense compared to the gain relatedincome tax benefit and loss on discontinued operations compared to the Second Lien Notes and lower expenses, including interest, partially offset by lower production revenues.income. See discussion above for explanations of variances.

5049

Table of Contents
Item 2.Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Continued

Results of Operations
Six Months Ended June 30, 2016, Compared to Six Months Ended June 30, 2015The following table reflects the Company’s results of operations for each of the Successor and Predecessor periods presented:
Six Months Ended
June 30,
  Successor  Predecessor
2016 2015 VarianceFour Months Ended June 30, 2017  Two Months Ended February 28, 2017 Six Months Ended June 30, 2016
(in thousands)
(in thousands)      
Revenues and other:           
Natural gas sales$205,777
 $322,004
 $(116,227)$148,551
  $99,561
 $178,743
Oil sales327,363
 545,691
 (218,328)119,475
  58,560
 146,522
NGL sales66,432
 79,293
 (12,861)55,466
  30,764
 55,023
Total oil, natural gas and NGL sales599,572
 946,988
 (347,416)323,492
  188,885
 380,288
Gains (losses) on oil and natural gas derivatives(72,807) 233,593
 (306,400)33,755
  92,691
 (74,341)
Marketing and other revenues(1)43,397
 57,794
 (14,397)23,880
  16,551
 69,559
570,162
 1,238,375
 (668,213)381,127
  298,127
 375,506
Expenses:           
Lease operating expenses253,188
 313,673
 (60,485)95,687
  49,665
 153,613
Transportation expenses106,960
 109,335
 (2,375)51,111
  25,972
 83,623
Marketing expenses23,593
 38,000
 (14,407)9,515
  4,820
 14,560
General and administrative expenses (1)(2)
146,175
 177,618
 (31,443)44,869
  71,745
 135,889
Exploration costs2,741
 960
 1,781
866
  93
 2,741
Depreciation, depletion and amortization307,229
 430,746
 (123,517)71,901
  47,155
 175,467
Impairment of long-lived assets1,153,904
 532,617
 621,287

  
 123,316
Taxes, other than income taxes64,914
 112,079
 (47,165)24,948
  14,877
 35,541
(Gains) losses on sale of assets and other, net4,019
 (30,283) 34,302
(306,524)  672
 3,786
2,062,723
 1,684,745
 377,978
(7,627)  214,999
 728,536
Other income and (expenses)(174,821) (281,774) 106,953
(13,302)  (16,874) (135,351)
Reorganization items, net534,884
 
 534,884
(5,942)  2,331,189
 485,798
Loss before income taxes(1,132,498) (728,144) (404,354)
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes369,510
  2,397,443
 (2,583)
Income tax expense (benefit)6,756
 (9,857) 16,613
153,455
  (166) 6,594
Net loss$(1,139,254) $(718,287) $(420,967)
Income (loss) from continuing operations216,055
  2,397,609
 (9,177)
Loss from discontinued operations, net of income taxes(3,254)  (548) (1,130,077)
Net income (loss)$212,801
  $2,397,061
 $(1,139,254)
(1) 
GeneralMarketing and administrative expensesother revenues for the two months ended February 28, 2017, and the six months ended June 30, 2016, include approximately $6 million and $41 million, respectively, of management fee revenues recognized by the Company from Berry. Management fee revenues are included in “other revenues” on the condensed consolidated statements of operations.
(2)
General and administrative expenses for the four months ended June 30, 2015,2017, the two months ended February 28, 2017, and the six months ended June 30, 2016, include approximately $14$20 million, $50 million and $28$14 million, respectively, of noncash unit-basedshare-based compensation expenses. In addition, general and administrative expenses for the two months ended February 28, 2017, and the six months ended June 30, 2016, include expenses incurred by LINN Energy associated with the operations of Berry. On February 28, 2017, LINN Energy and Berry emerged from bankruptcy as stand-alone, unaffiliated entities.

5150

Table of Contents
Item 2.Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Continued

Six Months Ended
June 30,
  Successor  Predecessor
2016 2015 VarianceFour Months Ended June 30, 2017  Two Months Ended February 28, 2017 Six Months Ended June 30, 2016
Average daily production:           
Natural gas (MMcf/d)602
 659
 (9)%448
  495
 523
Oil (MBbls/d)53.1
 63.8
 (17)%21.4
  20.2
 22.9
NGL (MBbls/d)29.3
 28.1
 4 %24.3
  21.4
 25.4
Total (MMcfe/d)1,096
 1,210
 (9)%722
  745
 813
           
Weighted average prices: (1)
           
Natural gas (Mcf)$1.88
 $2.70
 (30)%$2.72
  $3.41
 $1.88
Oil (Bbl)$33.90
 $47.27
 (28)%$45.79
  $49.16
 $35.18
NGL (Bbl)$12.44
 $15.58
 (20)%$18.68
  $24.37
 $11.89
           
Average NYMEX prices:           
Natural gas (MMBtu)$2.02
 $2.81
 (28)%$3.05
  $3.66
 $2.02
Oil (Bbl)$39.52
 $53.29
 (26)%$48.63
  $53.04
 $39.52
           
Costs per Mcfe of production:           
Lease operating expenses$1.27
 $1.43
 (11)%$1.09
  $1.13
 $1.04
Transportation expenses$0.54
 $0.50
 8 %$0.58
  $0.59
 $0.57
General and administrative expenses (2)
$0.73
 $0.81
 (10)%$0.51
  $1.63
 $0.92
Depreciation, depletion and amortization$1.54
 $1.97
 (22)%$0.82
  $1.07
 $1.19
Taxes, other than income taxes$0.33
 $0.51
 (35)%$0.28
  $0.34
 $0.24
      
Average daily production – discontinued operations:      
Total (MMcfe/d)29
  30
 283
(1) 
Does not include the effect of gains (losses) on derivatives.
(2) 
General and administrative expenses for the four months ended June 30, 2017, the two months ended February 28, 2017, and the six months ended June 30, 2016, and June 30, 2015, include approximately $14$20 million, $50 million and $28$14 million, respectively, of noncash unit-basedshare-based compensation expenses. In addition, general and administrative expenses for the two months ended February 28, 2017, and the six months ended June 30, 2016, include expenses incurred by LINN Energy associated with the operations of Berry. On February 28, 2017, LINN Energy and Berry emerged from bankruptcy as stand-alone, unaffiliated entities.

5251

Table of Contents
Item 2.Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Continued

Revenues and Other
Oil, Natural Gas and NGL Sales
Oil, natural gas and NGL sales decreasedincreased by approximately $347$132 million or 37%35% to approximately $600$323 million and $189 million for the four months ended June 30, 2017, and the two months ended February 28, 2017, respectively, from approximately $380 million for the six months ended June 30, 2016, from approximately $947 million for the six months ended June 30, 2015, due to lower oil,higher natural gas, oil and NGL prices, andpartially offset by lower production volumes. Lower oil,Higher natural gas, oil and NGL prices resulted in a decreasean increase in revenues of approximately $129$91 million, $90$44 million and $17$36 million, respectively.
Average daily production volumes decreased to approximately 1,096722 MMcfe/d and 745 MMcfe/d for the four months ended June 30, 2017, and the two months ended February 28, 2017, respectively, from approximately 813 MMcfe/d for the six months ended June 30, 2016, from 1,210 MMcfe/d for the six months ended June 30, 2015.2016. Lower natural gas, oil and natural gasNGL production volumes resulted in a decrease in revenues of approximately $89$21 million, $13 million and $26$5 million, respectively. Higher NGL production volumes resulted in an increase in revenues of approximately $4 million.
The following table sets forth average daily production by region:
Six Months Ended
June 30,
    Successor  Predecessor
2016 2015 VarianceFour Months Ended June 30, 2017  Two Months Ended February 28, 2017 Six Months Ended June 30, 2016
Average daily production (MMcfe/d):             
Rockies393
 434
 (41) (10)%254
  294
 338
Hugoton Basin240
 251
 (11) (4)%166
  159
 185
California164
 189
 (25) (13)%
Mid-Continent99
 101
 (2) (1)%125
  109
 99
TexLa80
 79
 1
 1 %77
  80
 71
Permian Basin60
 90
 (30) (33)%46
  49
 60
Michigan/Illinois31
 31
 
 
29
  29
 31
South Texas29
 35
 (6) (18)%25
  25
 29
1,096
 1,210
 (114) (9)%722
  745
 813
The increases in average daily production volumes in the Mid-Continent and TexLa primarily reflect increased development capital spending in the regions. The decreases in average daily production volumes in the remaining regions primarily reflect lower production volumes as a result of reduced development capital spending throughout the Company’s various operating regions, as well as marginal well shut-ins, driven by continued low commodity prices. The decrease in average daily production volumes in California also reflects operational challenges in the Company’s Diatomite development program, where the Company is pursuing various remedies to address wells performance and has temporarily curtailed capital spending in this program. The decrease in average daily production volumes in the Permian BasinRockies region also reflects lower production volumes as a result of the Howard County assets saleJonah Assets Sale on AugustMay 31, 2015.2017.
Gains (Losses) on Oil and Natural Gas Derivatives
LossesGains on oil and natural gas derivatives were approximately $73$34 million and $93 million for the four months ended June 30, 2017, and the two months ended February 28, 2017, respectively, compared to losses on oil and natural gas derivatives of approximately $74 million for the six months ended June 30, 2016, compared to gains of approximately $234 million for the six months ended June 30, 2015, representing a variance of approximately $307$201 million. LossesGains and losses on oil and natural gas derivatives were primarily due to changes in fair value of the derivative contracts, and the comparison from period to period was impacted by the declining maturity schedule of the Company’s hedges.contracts. The fair value on unsettled derivative contracts changes as future commodity price expectations change compared to the contract prices on the derivatives. If the expected future commodity prices increase compared to the contract prices on the derivatives, losses are recognized; and if the expected future commodity prices decrease compared to the contract prices on the derivatives, gains are recognized.
See above under “Executive Overview” for details about the Company’s commodity derivative cancellations in April 2016 and May 2016.

53

Table of Contents
Item 2.Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Continued

The Company determines the fair value of its oil and natural gas derivatives utilizing pricing models that use a variety of techniques, including market quotes and pricing analysis. See Item 3. “Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk” and Note 7 and Note 8 for additional details about the Company’s commodity derivatives. For information about the Company’s credit risk related to derivative contracts, see “Counterparty Credit Risk” under “Liquidity and Capital Resources” below.

52

Table of Contents
Item 2.Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Continued

Marketing and Other Revenues
Marketing revenues represent third-party activities associated with company-owned gathering systems, plants and facilities. Other revenues primarily include management fee revenues recognized by the Company from Berry (in the Predecessor periods) and helium sales revenue. Marketing and other revenues decreased by approximately $15$29 million or 25%42% to approximately $43$24 million and $17 million for the four months ended June 30, 2017, and the two months ended February 28, 2017, respectively, from approximately $70 million for the six months ended June 30, 2016, from approximately $58 million for the six months ended June 30, 2015.2016. The decrease was primarily due to lowerthe management fee revenues from Berry included in the Predecessor periods, partially offset by higher revenues generated by the Jayhawk natural gas processing plant in Kansas principally driven by a change in contract terms, and lower electricity sales revenues generated by the Company’s California cogeneration facilities, partially offset by higher helium sales revenue in the Hugoton Basin.
Expenses
Lease Operating Expenses
Lease operating expenses include expenses such as labor, field office, vehicle, supervision, maintenance, tools and supplies, and workover expenses. Lease operating expenses decreased by approximately $61$8 million or 19%5% to approximately $253$96 million and $50 million for the four months ended June 30, 2017, and the two months ended February 28, 2017, respectively, from approximately $154 million for the six months ended June 30, 2016, from approximately $314 million for the six months ended June 30, 2015.2016. The decrease was primarily due to reduced labor costs for field operations as a result of cost savings initiatives and lower workover activities, as well as a decrease in steam costs caused by lower prices for natural gas used in steam generation and a decrease in steam injection volumes.initiatives. Lease operating expenses per Mcfe also decreasedincreased to $1.27$1.09 per Mcfe and $1.13 per Mcfe for the four months ended June 30, 2017, and the two months ended February 28, 2017, respectively, compared to $1.04 per Mcfe for the six months ended June 30, 2016,2016.
Transportation Expenses
Transportation expenses decreased by approximately $7 million or 8% to approximately $51 million and $26 million for the four months ended June 30, 2017, and the two months ended February 28, 2017, respectively, from $1.43approximately $84 million for the six months ended June 30, 2016. The decrease was primarily due to reduced costs as a result of lower production volumes and as a result of the properties sold in May 2017. Transportation expenses per Mcfe increased to $0.58 per Mcfe and $0.59 per Mcfe for the four months ended June 30, 2017, and the two months ended February 28, 2017, respectively, compared to $0.57 per Mcfe for the six months ended June 30, 2015.
Transportation Expenses
Transportation expenses decreased by approximately $2 million or 2% to approximately $107 million for the six months ended June 30, 2016, from approximately $109 million for the six months ended June 30, 2015. The decrease was primarily due to lower production volumes and reduced costs as a result of certain contracts terminated in the Chapter 11 proceedings, partially offset by higher costs from nonoperated properties in the Rockies region. Transportation expenses per Mcfe increased to $0.54 per Mcfe for the six months ended June 30, 2016, from $0.50 per Mcfe for the six months ended June 30, 2015.2016.
Marketing Expenses
Marketing expenses represent third-party activities associated with company-owned gathering systems, plants and facilities. Marketing expenses decreased byremained relatively consistent at approximately $14$10 million or 38%and $5 million for the four months ended June 30, 2017, and the two months ended February 28, 2017, respectively, compared to approximately $24$15 million for the six months ended June 30, 2016, from approximately $38 million for the six months ended June 30, 2015. The decrease was primarily due to lower expenses associated with the Jayhawk natural gas processing plant in Kansas, principally driven by a change in contract terms, and lower electricity generation expenses incurred by the Company’s California cogeneration facilities.2016.
General and Administrative Expenses
General and administrative expenses are costs not directly associated with field operations and reflect the costs of employees including executive officers, related benefits, office leases and professional fees. In addition, general and administrative expenses in the Predecessor periods include expenses incurred by LINN Energy associated with the operations of Berry. General and administrative expenses decreased by approximately $32$19 million or 18%14% to approximately $146$45 million and $72 million for the four months ended June 30, 2017, and the two months ended February 28, 2017, respectively, from approximately $136 million for the six months ended June 30, 2016, from approximately $178 million for the six months ended June 30, 2015.2016. The decrease was primarily due to lower salaries and benefits related expenses, the costs associated with the operations of Berry in the Predecessor periods, lower acquisitionprofessional services expenses and lower professional services expenses. General andvarious other administrative expenses forincluding insurance and rent, partially offset by higher noncash share-based compensation expenses principally driven by the six months ended June 30, 2015, was impacted by advisory fees related to alliance agreements entered into withimmediate vesting of certain private capital investors.awards on the Effective Date. General and administrative expenses per Mcfe also decreasewere $0.51 per Mcfe and $1.63 per Mcfe for the four months ended June 30, 2017, and the two months ended February 28, 2017, respectively, compared to $0.73$0.92 per Mcfe for the six months ended June 30, 2016, from $0.81 per Mcfe for the six months ended June 30, 2015.2016.
ProfessionalFor professional services expenses of approximately $21 million for the six months ended June 30, 2016, related to the Chapter 11 proceedings that were incurred since the Petition Date, have beensee “Reorganization Items, Net.”
Exploration Costs
Exploration costs decreased by approximately $2 million to approximately $866,000 and $93,000 for the four months ended June 30, 2017, and the two months ended February 28, 2017, respectively, from approximately $3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2016. The decrease was primarily due to lower seismic data expenses.

53

Table of Contents
Item 2.Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Continued

Depreciation, Depletion and Amortization
Depreciation, depletion and amortization decreased by approximately $56 million or 32% to approximately $72 million and $47 million for the four months ended June 30, 2017, and the two months ended February 28, 2017, respectively, from approximately $175 million for the six months ended June 30, 2016. The decrease was primarily due to lower rates as a result of the application of fresh start accounting and impairments recorded in “reorganization items, net”the first quarter of 2016, as well as lower total production volumes. Depreciation, depletion and amortization per Mcfe also decreased to $0.82 per Mcfe and $1.07 per Mcfe for the four months ended June 30, 2017, and the two months ended February 28, 2017, respectively, from $1.19 per Mcfe for the six months ended June 30, 2016.
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets
The Company recorded no impairment charges for the four months ended June 30, 2017, or the two months ended February 28, 2017. During the six months ended June 30, 2016, the Company recorded an impairment charge of approximately $123 million associated with proved oil and natural gas properties in the Mid-Continent region due to a decline in commodity prices, changes in expected capital development and a decline in the Company’s estimates of proved reserves.
Taxes, Other Than Income Taxes
 Successor  Predecessor
 Four Months Ended June 30, 2017  Two Months Ended February 28, 2017 Six Months Ended June 30, 2016
(in thousands)      
Severance taxes$14,532
  $9,107
 $17,157
Ad valorem taxes10,101
  5,744
 17,381
Other315
  26
 1,003
 $24,948
  $14,877
 $35,541
Severance taxes, which are a function of revenues generated from production, increased primarily due to higher commodity prices partially offset by lower production volumes. Ad valorem taxes, which are based on the condensed consolidated statementsvalue of operations.reserves and production equipment and vary by location, decreased primarily due to lower estimated valuations on certain of the Company’s properties.
(Gains) Losses on Sale of Assets and Other, Net
During the four months ended June 30, 2017, the Company recorded the following net gains on divestitures (see Note 4):
Net gain of approximately $22 million on the Salt Creek Assets Sale; and
Net gain of approximately $279 million, including costs to sell of approximately $6 million, on the Jonah Assets Sale.
Other Income and (Expenses)
 Successor  Predecessor
 Four Months Ended June 30, 2017  Two Months Ended February 28, 2017 Six Months Ended June 30, 2016
(in thousands)      
Interest expense, net of amounts capitalized$(11,751)  $(16,725) $(134,193)
Other, net(1,551)  (149) (1,158)
 $(13,302)  $(16,874) $(135,351)
Interest expense decreased primarily due to the Company’s discontinuation of interest expense recognition on the senior notes for the two months ended February 28, 2017, as a result of the Chapter 11 proceedings, lower outstanding debt and lower amortization of discounts and financing fees. For the two months ended February 28, 2017, and the period from May 12, 2016

54

Table of Contents
Item 2.Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Continued

Exploration Costs
Exploration costs increased by approximately $2 million to approximately $3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2016, from approximately $1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2015. The increase was primarily due to seismic data expenses associated with activities in the Mid-Continent region.
Depreciation, Depletion and Amortization
Depreciation, depletion and amortization decreased by approximately $124 million or 29% to approximately $307 million for the six months ended June 30, 2016, from approximately $431 million for the six months ended June 30, 2015. The decrease was primarily due to lower rates as a result of the impairments recorded in the prior year and the first quarter of 2016, as well as lower total production volumes. Depreciation, depletion and amortization per Mcfe also decreased to $1.54 per Mcfe for the six months ended June 30, 2016, from $1.97 per Mcfe for the six months ended June 30, 2015.
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets
The Company recorded the following noncash impairment charges (before and after tax) associated with proved and unproved oil and natural gas properties:
 Six Months Ended
June 30,
 2016 2015
 (in thousands)
    
California region$984,288
 $207,200
Mid-Continent region129,703
 5,703
Rockies region26,677
 
Hugoton Basin region
 277,914
TexLa region
 33,100
South Texas region
 8,700
Proved oil and natural gas properties1,140,668
 532,617
California region unproved oil and natural gas properties13,236
 
Impairment of long-lived assets$1,153,904
 $532,617
The impairment charges in 2016 were due to a decline in commodity prices, changes in expected capital development and a decline in the Company’s estimates of proved reserves. The impairment charges in 2015 were due to a decline in commodity prices.
Taxes, Other Than Income Taxes
 Six Months Ended
June 30,
  
 2016 2015 Variance
 (in thousands)
      
Severance taxes$18,328
 $34,566
 $(16,238)
Ad valorem taxes38,619
 65,896
 (27,277)
California carbon allowances6,877
 11,699
 (4,822)
Other1,090
 (82) 1,172
 $64,914
 $112,079
 $(47,165)
Taxes, other than income taxes decreased by approximately $47 million or 42% for the six months ended June 30, 2016, compared to the six months ended June 30, 2015. Severance taxes, which are a function of revenues generated from production, decreased primarily due to lower oil, natural gas and NGL prices and lower production volumes. Ad valorem taxes, which are based on the value of reserves and production equipment and vary by location, decreased primarily due to lower estimated valuations on certain of the Company’s properties. California carbon allowances decreased primarily due to lower anticipated emissions compliance obligations as a result of reduced capital spending levels and a decrease in steam injection volumes.

55

Table of Contents
Item 2.Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Continued

Other Income and (Expenses)
 Six Months Ended
June 30,
  
 2016 2015 Variance
 (in thousands)
      
Interest expense, net of amounts capitalized$(173,653) $(289,201) $115,548
Gain on extinguishment of debt
 15,786
 (15,786)
Other, net(1,168) (8,359) 7,191
 $(174,821) $(281,774) $106,953
Other income and (expenses) decreased by approximately $107 million for the six months ended June 30, 2016, compared to the six months ended June 30, 2015. Interest expense decreased primarily due to lower outstanding debt during the period principally as a result of the senior notes repurchased and exchanged during 2015, discontinuation of interest expense recognition on the senior notes for the period from May 12, 2016 through June 30, 2016, as a result of the Chapter 11 proceedings and lower amortization of discounts and financing fees. For the period from May 12, 2016, through June 30, 2016, contractual interest, which was not recorded, on the senior notes was approximately $38 million. For the six months ended June 30, 2015, the Company recorded a gain on extinguishment of debt of approximately $16$37 million as a result of the repurchases of a portion of its senior notes. Other expenses decreased primarily due to lower write-offs of deferred financing fees related to the Credit Facilities and lower bank fees.$31 million, respectively. See “Debt” under “Liquidity and Capital Resources” below for additional details.
The $1.0 billion in aggregate principal amount of Second Lien Notes issued in November 2015 were accounted for as a troubled debt restructuring which requires that interest payments on the Second Lien Notes reduce the carrying value of the debt with no interest expense recognized. As a result ofFor the Chapter 11 proceedings,two months ended February 28, 2017, and the Company did not make theperiod from May 12, 2016 through June 30, 2016, unrecorded contractual interest payment ofon the Second Lien Notes was $20 million and approximately $68$16 million, due in June 2016, including approximately $55 million related to the six months ended June 30, 2016.respectively.
Reorganization Items, Net
The Company has incurred and is expected to continue to incur significant costs and recognized significant gains associated with the reorganization. These costs, which are expensed as incurred, are expected to significantly affect the Company’s results of operations. Reorganization items represent costs and income directly associated with the Chapter 11 proceedings since the Petition Date, and also include adjustments to reflect the carrying value of certain liabilities subject to compromise at their estimated allowed claim amounts, as such adjustments arewere determined.
The following table summarizes the components of reorganization items included on the condensed consolidated statementstatements of operations:
Six Months Ended June 30, 2016Successor  Predecessor
(in thousands)Four Months Ended June 30, 2017  Two Months Ended February 28, 2017 Six Months Ended June 30, 2016
 
(in thousands)      
Gain on settlement of liabilities subject to compromise$
  $3,724,750
 $
Recognition of an additional claim for the Predecessor’s Second Lien Notes settlement
  (1,000,000) 
Fresh start valuation adjustments
  (591,525) 
Income tax benefit related to implementation of the Plan
  264,889
 
Legal and other professional advisory fees$(20,510)(6,016)  (46,961) (13,451)
Unamortized deferred financing fees, discounts and premiums(41,122)
  
 (52,045)
Gain related to interest payable on the 12.00% senior secured second lien notes due December 2020 (1)
551,000
Gain related to interest payable on Predecessor’s Second Lien Notes
  
 551,000
Terminated contracts45,109

  (6,915) 
Other407
74
  (13,049) 294
Reorganization items, net$534,884
$(5,942)  $2,331,189
 $485,798
Income Tax Expense (Benefit)
Effective February 28, 2017, upon the consummation of the Plan, the Successor became a C corporation. Prior to the consummation of the Plan, the Predecessor was a limited liability company treated as a partnership for federal and state income tax purposes, with the exception of the state of Texas, in which income tax liabilities and/or benefits were passed through to its unitholders. Limited liability companies are subject to Texas margin tax. In addition, certain of the Predecessor’s subsidiaries were C corporations subject to federal and state income taxes. The Company recognized income tax expense of approximately $153 million and an income tax benefit of approximately $166,000 for the four months ended June 30, 2017, and the two months ended February 28, 2017, respectively, compared to income tax expense of approximately $7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2016.
Loss from Discontinued Operations, Net of Income Taxes
As a result of the Company’s strategic exit from California (completed by the San Joaquin Basin Sale and Los Angeles Basin Sale) and the deconsolidation of Berry, the Company has classified the results of operations of its California properties and Berry as discontinued operations. Loss from discontinued operations, net of income taxes decreased to approximately $3 million and $548,000 for the four months ended June 30, 2017, and the two months ended February 28, 2017, respectively, from approximately $1.1 billion for the six months ended June 30, 2016. See Note 4 for additional information.

55

Table of Contents
(1)
Item 2.
Represents a non-cash gain on the write-offManagement’s Discussion and Analysis of postpetition contractual interest through maturity, recorded to reflect the carrying valueFinancial Condition and Results of the liability subject to compromise at its estimated allowed claim amount.
Operations - Continued

Net Income (Loss)
Net income increased by approximately $3.7 billion to net income of approximately $213 million and $2.4 billion for the four months ended June 30, 2017, and the two months ended February 28, 2017, respectively, from a net loss of approximately $1.1 billion for the six months ended June 30, 2016. The increase was primarily due to higher gains included in reorganization items, lower losses from discontinued operations, gains on sales of assets, gains compared to losses on commodity derivatives, lower impairment charges, lower expenses and higher production revenues. See discussion above for explanations of variances.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Since its emergence from Chapter 11 bankruptcy in February 2017, the Company’s sources of cash have primarily consisted of proceeds from its 2017 oil and natural gas properties divestitures and net cash provided by operating activities. As a result of divesting certain oil and natural gas properties, the Company received over $1 billion in cash proceeds and repaid all of its outstanding debt as of July 31, 2017. The Company has also used its cash to fund capital expenditures, principally for the development of its oil and natural gas properties, and plant and pipeline construction. The Company expects to fund the remaining 2017 capital program with excess cash from its divestitures and net cash provided by operating activities.
Prior to its emergence from bankruptcy, the Company utilized funds from debt and equity offerings, borrowings under its credit facilities and net cash provided by operating activities for liquidity and capital resources, and the primary use was for the development of oil and natural gas properties, as well as for acquisitions.
See below for details regarding capital expenditures for the periods presented:
 Successor  Predecessor
 Four Months Ended June 30, 2017  Two Months Ended February 28, 2017 Six Months Ended June 30, 2016
(in thousands)      
Oil and natural gas$87,632
  $39,409
 $40,184
Plant and pipeline22,724
  4,990
 7,729
Other3,919
  1,243
 5,562
Capital expenditures, excluding acquisitions$114,275
  $45,642
 $53,475
Capital expenditures, excluding acquisitions – discontinued operations$1,790
  $436
 $12,806
The increase in capital expenditures was primarily due to oil and natural gas development activities in the Merge/SCOOP/STACK and plant and pipeline construction activities associated with the Chisholm Trail Cryogenic Gas Plant. For 2017, the Company estimates its total capital expenditures, excluding acquisitions, will be approximately $229 million, including approximately $338 million related to its oil and natural gas capital program and approximately $100 million related to its plant and pipeline capital. This estimate is under continuous review and subject to ongoing adjustments.

56

Table of Contents
Item 2.Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Continued

Income Tax Expense (Benefit)Statements of Cash Flows
The Company isfollowing provides a limited liability company treated as a partnershipcomparative cash flow summary:
 Successor  Predecessor
 Four Months Ended June 30, 2017  Two Months Ended February 28, 2017 Six Months Ended June 30, 2016
(in thousands)      
Net cash:      
Provided by (used in) operating activities$131,425
  $(20,814) $801,201
Provided by (used in) investing activities550,753
  (58,756) (71,111)
Provided by (used in) financing activities(719,630)  (560,932) 42,387
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents$(37,452)  $(640,502) $772,477
Operating Activities
Cash provided by operating activities was approximately $131 million and cash used in operating activities was approximately $21 million for federalthe four months ended June 30, 2017, and state income tax purposes, with the exception of the state of Texas, in which income tax liabilities and/or benefits are passed throughtwo months ended February 28, 2017, respectively, compared to its unitholders. Limited liability companies are subject to Texas margin tax. In addition, certain of the Company’s subsidiaries are Subchapter C-corporations subject to federal and state income taxes. The Company recognized income tax expensecash provided by operating activities of approximately $7$801 million for the six months ended June 30, 2016, compared2016. The decrease was primarily due to an income tax benefitlower cash settlements on derivatives partially offset by higher production related revenues principally due to higher commodity prices. In addition, in February 2017, restricted cash increased by approximately $80 million in order to fund the settlement of approximately $10 millioncertain claims and pay certain professional fees in accordance with the Plan.
Investing Activities
The following provides a comparative summary of cash flow from investing activities:
 Successor  Predecessor
 Four Months Ended June 30, 2017  Two Months Ended February 28, 2017 Six Months Ended June 30, 2016
(in thousands)      
Cash flow from investing activities:      
Capital expenditures$(88,821)  $(58,006) $(94,564)
Proceeds from sale of properties and equipment and other641,219
  (166) (2,713)
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities –
continuing operations
552,398
  (58,172) (97,277)
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities – discontinued operations(1,645)  (584) 26,166
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities$550,753
  $(58,756) $(71,111)
The primary use of cash in investing activities is for the six months ended June 30, 2015. The income tax expense isdevelopment of the Company’s oil and natural gas properties. Capital expenditures increased primarily due to higher income fromspending on development activities in the Company’s taxable subsidiariesMid-Continent, Rockies and TexLa regions. The Company made no acquisitions of properties during the six months ended June 30, 2016, compared to2017, or June 30, 2016. The Company has classified the same period in 2015.cash flows of its California properties and Berry as discontinued operations.
Net Loss
Net loss increased by approximately $421 million or 59% to approximately $1.1 billionProceeds from sale of properties and equipment and other for the sixfour months ended June 30, 2016, from2017, include approximately $718$76 million for the six months ended June 30, 2015. The increase was primarily due to higher impairment charges and lower production revenues, as well as losses compared to gains on oil and natural gas derivatives for the comparative period, partially offset by the gain related to the Second Lien Notes and lower expenses, including interest. See discussion above for explanations of variances.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
The significant risks and uncertainties related to the Company’s liquidity and Chapter 11 proceedings described under “Executive Overview” raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.
The Company’s filing of the Bankruptcy Petitions constituted an event of default that accelerated the Company’s obligations under its Credit Facilities, its Second Lien Notes and its senior notes. Additionally, other events of default, including cross-defaults, are present, including the failure to make interest payments on the Company’s Second Lien Notes and certain of its senior notes, as well as the receipt of a going concern explanatory paragraphin net cash proceeds received from the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm on the Company’s consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2015. Under the Bankruptcy Code, the creditors under these debt agreements are stayed from taking any action against the Company as a result of an event of default. See above under “Executive Overview – Chapter 11 Proceedings” for a description of theseSalt Creek Assets Sale in June 2017 and other developments.
In order to decrease the Company’s level of indebtedness and maintain the Company’s liquidity at levels sufficient to meet its commitments, the Company undertook a number of actions, including minimizing capital expenditures and further reducing its recurring operating expenses. Despite taking these actions, the Company did not have sufficient liquidity to satisfy its debt service obligations, meet other financial obligations and comply with its debt covenants. As a result, the Debtors filed Bankruptcy Petitions for relief under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code.
Although the Company believes its cash flow from operations and cash on hand will be adequate to meet the operating costs of its existing business, there are no assurances that the Company’s cash flow from operations and cash on hand will be sufficient to continue to fund its operations or to allow the Company to continue as a going concern until a Plan is confirmed by the Bankruptcy Court or other alternative restructuring transaction is approved by the Bankruptcy Court and consummated. The Company’s long-term liquidity requirements, the adequacy of its capital resources and its ability to continue as a going concern are difficult to predict at this time and ultimately cannot be determined until a Plan has been confirmed, if at all, by the Bankruptcy Court. See Item 1A. “Risk Factors”approximately $555 million in this Quarterly Report on Form 10‑Q and in the Annual Report on Form 10‑K for the year ended December 31, 2015, for risks relating to liquidity and Chapter 11 proceedings.
The Company has utilized funds from debt and equity offerings, borrowings under its Credit Facilities and net cash provided by operating activitiesproceeds received from the Jonah Assets Sale in May 2017. An additional $5 million received from the Jonah Assets Sale remains in escrow and is currently classified as restricted cash. See Note 4 for capital resources and liquidity. To date, the primary useadditional details of capital has been for acquisitions and the development of oil and natural gas properties. For the six months ended June 30, 2016, the Company’s total capital expenditures were approximately $66 million.divestitures.

57

Table of Contents
Item 2.Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Continued

See below for details regarding capital expendituresFinancing Activities
Cash used in financing activities was approximately $720 million and $561 million for the periods presented:
 Six Months Ended
June 30,
 2016 2015
 (in thousands)
    
Oil and natural gas$45,566
 $282,403
Plant and pipeline15,028
 5,002
Other5,687
 24,175
Capital expenditures$66,281
 $311,580
For 2016, the Company estimates its total capital expenditures, excluding acquisitions, will be approximately $235 million, including approximately $160 million related to its oil and natural gas capital program and approximately $60 million related to its plant and pipeline capital. This estimate is under continuous review and subject to ongoing adjustments. The Company expects to fund its capital expenditures primarily from net cash provided by operating activities; however, there is uncertainty regarding the Company’s liquidity as discussed above.
Statements of Cash Flows
The following is a comparative cash flow summary:
 Six Months Ended
June 30,
  
 2016 2015 Variance
 (in thousands)
Net cash:     
Provided by operating activities$801,201
 $673,482
 $127,719
Used in investing activities(71,111) (386,920) 315,809
Provided by (used in) financing activities42,387
 (284,428) 326,815
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents$772,477
 $2,134
 $770,343
Operating Activities
Cash provided by operating activities for the sixfour months ended June 30, 2016, was approximately $801 million,2017, and the two months ended February 28, 2017, respectively, compared to cash provided by financing activities of approximately $673$42 million for the six months ended June 30, 2015. The increase was primarily due to higher cash settlements on derivatives and lower expenses, partially offset by lower production related revenues principally due to lower commodity prices and lower production volumes.
Investing Activities
The following provides a comparative summary of cash flow from investing activities:
 Six Months Ended
June 30,
 2016 2015
 (in thousands)
Cash flow from investing activities:   
Capital expenditures$(121,958) $(445,634)
Decrease in restricted cash53,418
 
Proceeds from sale of properties and equipment and other(2,571) 58,714
 $(71,111) $(386,920)


58

Table of Contents
Item 2.Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Continued

The primary use of cash in investing activities is for2016. On February 28, 2017, the development ofCompany canceled its obligations under the Company’s oil and natural gas properties. Capital expenditures decreased primarily due to lower spending on development activities throughout the Company’s various operating regions as a result of continued low commodity prices. The Company made no acquisitions of properties during the six months ended June 30, 2016, or June 30, 2015. In addition, during the second quarter of 2016, restricted cash was reduced by approximately $53 million as a result of the amendment to the BerryPredecessor Credit Facility and entered into the Restructuring Support Agreement. SeeSuccessor Credit Facility (see Note 2 for additional details.
Financing Activities
Cash provided by financing activities for6), which was a net transaction and is reflected as such on the six months ended June 30, 2016, was approximately $42 million, compared tocondensed consolidated statement of cash used in financing activities of approximately $284 million for the six months ended June 30, 2015.flows. During the six months ended June 30, 2016, the Company borrowed approximately $979 million under the LINNPredecessor Credit Facility, including approximately $919 million in February 2016 which represented the remaining undrawn amount that was available. In addition, during the six months ended June 30, 2016, the Company repaid approximately $913 million under the LINNPredecessor Credit Facility and term loan, and approximately $2 million under the Berry Credit Facility, primarily using the net cash proceeds from canceled derivative contracts (see Note 7).Facility.
The following provides a comparative summary of proceeds from borrowings and repayments of debt:
 Six Months Ended
June 30,
 2016 2015
 (in thousands)
Proceeds from borrowings:   
LINN Credit Facility$978,500
 $645,000
 $978,500
 $645,000
Repayments of debt:   
LINN Credit Facility$(814,299) $(685,000)
Berry Credit Facility(1,593) 
Term loan(98,911) 
Senior notes
 (165,051)
 $(914,803) $(850,051)
 Successor  Predecessor
 Four Months Ended June 30, 2017  Two Months Ended February 28, 2017 Six Months Ended June 30, 2016
(in thousands)      
Proceeds from borrowings:      
Successor Credit Facility$160,000
  $
 $
Predecessor Credit Facility
  
 978,500
 $160,000
  $
 $978,500
Repayments of debt:      
Successor Credit Facility$(576,570)  $
 $
Successor Term Loan(300,000)  
 
Predecessor Credit Facility
  (1,038,986) (814,299)
Predecessor Term Loan
  
 (98,911)
 $(876,570)  $(1,038,986) $(913,210)
See Note 13 for details about borrowings and repaymentsIn addition, in February 2017, the Company made a $30 million payment to holders of debt that were reflected as noncash transactionsclaims under the Second Lien Notes. The Company also issued 41,359,806 shares of Class A common stock to participants in the rights offerings extended by the Company.Company to certain holders of claims arising under the Second Lien Notes and the Unsecured Notes for net proceeds of approximately $514 million.

5958

Table of Contents
Item 2.Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Continued

Debt
The following summarizes the Company’s outstanding debt:
 June 30, 2016 December 31, 2015
 (in thousands, except percentages)
    
LINN credit facility$1,654,745
 $2,215,000
Berry credit facility874,959
 873,175
Term loan284,241
 500,000
6.50% senior notes due May 2019562,234
 562,234
6.25% senior notes due November 2019581,402
 581,402
8.625% senior notes due April 2020718,596
 718,596
6.75% Berry senior notes due November 2020261,100
 261,100
12.00% senior secured second lien notes due December 2020 (1)
1,000,000
 1,000,000
Interest payable on senior secured second lien notes due December 2020 (1)

 608,333
7.75% senior notes due February 2021779,474
 779,474
6.50% senior notes due September 2021381,423
 381,423
6.375% Berry senior notes due September 2022572,700
 572,700
Net unamortized discounts and premiums (2)

 (8,694)
Net unamortized deferred financing fees (2)
(1,536) (37,374)
Total debt, net7,669,338
 9,007,369
Less current portion, net (3)
(2,812,409) (3,714,693)
Less liabilities subject to compromise (4)
(4,856,929) 
Long-term debt, net$
 $5,292,676
 Successor  Predecessor
 June 30, 2017  December 31, 2016
(in thousands, except percentages)    
Successor revolving loan$183,430
  $
Predecessor credit facility
  1,654,745
Predecessor term loan
  284,241
6.50% senior notes due May 2019
  562,234
6.25% senior notes due November 2019
  581,402
8.625% senior notes due April 2020
  718,596
12.00% senior secured second lien notes due December 2020
  1,000,000
7.75% senior notes due February 2021
  779,474
6.50% senior notes due September 2021
  381,423
Net unamortized deferred financing fees
  (1,257)
Total debt, net183,430
  5,960,858
Less current portion, net (1)

  (1,937,729)
Less liabilities subject to compromise (2)

  (4,023,129)
Long-term debt$183,430
  $
(1) 
The issuance ofDue to covenant violations, the Second Lien Notes was accounted for as a troubled debt restructuring, which requires that interest payments on the Second Lien Notes reduce the carrying value of the debt with no interest expense recognized. During the three months ended June 30, 2016, $551 million was written off to reorganization items in connection with the filing of the Bankruptcy Petitions. The remaining amount of approximately $57 million wasPredecessor’s credit facility and term loan were classified as liabilities subject to compromisecurrent at June 30,December 31, 2016.
(2) 
Approximately $41 million in net discounts, premiums and deferred financing fees were written off to reorganization items in connection with the filing of the Bankruptcy Petitions.
(3)
Due to existing and anticipated covenant violations, the Company’s Credit Facilities and term loan were classified as current at June 30, 2016, and December 31, 2015. The current portion as of December 31, 2015, also includes approximately $128 million of interest payable on the Second Lien Notes due within one year.
(4)
The Company’sPredecessor’s senior notes and Second Lien Notes were classified as liabilities subject to compromise at June 30,December 31, 2016. On the Effective Date, pursuant to the terms of the Plan, all outstanding amounts under these debt instruments were canceled.
As of June 30, 2016,July 31, 2017, there waswere no remaining available borrowing capacityborrowings outstanding under the Successor Credit Facilities. Facility. Pursuant to the terms of the Plan, on the Effective Date, all obligations under the Predecessor’s credit facility, Second Lien Notes and senior notes were canceled.
For additional information related to the Company’s outstanding debt, see Note 6. The
Share Repurchase Program
On June 1, 2017, the Company’s Board of Directors announced that it had authorized the repurchase of up to $75 million of the Company’s outstanding shares of Class A common stock. On June 28, 2017, the Company’s Board of Directors announced that it had authorized an increase in the previously announced share repurchase program to up to a total of $200 million of the Company’s outstanding shares of Class A common stock. In June 2017, the Company plans to file Berry’s stand-alone financial statements with the Securities and Exchange Commissionrepurchased 7,540 shares of Class A common stock at an average price of $30.48 per share for a later date.total cost of approximately $230,000.
Counterparty Credit Risk
The Company accounts for its commodity derivatives at fair value. As a resultThe Company’s counterparties are participants in the Successor Credit Facility or were participants in the Predecessor Credit Facility. The Successor Credit Facility is secured by certain of the commodity derivative cancellations during the second quarter of 2016,Company’s and its subsidiaries’ oil, natural gas and NGL reserves and personal property; therefore, the Company has only one remaining commodity derivative counterparty.is not required to post any collateral. The Company does not receive collateral from its counterparties. The Company minimizedminimizes the credit risk in derivative instruments by: (i) limiting its exposure to any single counterparty; (ii) entering into derivative instruments only with counterparties that meet the Company’s minimum credit quality standard, or have a guarantee from an affiliate that meets the Company’s minimum credit quality standard; and (iii) monitoring the creditworthiness of the Company’s counterparties on an ongoing basis. In accordance with the Company’s standard practice, its commodity derivatives are subject to counterparty netting under agreements governing such derivatives and therefore the risk of loss due to counterparty nonperformance is somewhat mitigated.

6059

Table of Contents
Item 2.Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Continued

agreements governing such derivatives and therefore the risk of loss due to counterparty nonperformance is somewhat mitigated.
At-the-Market Offering Program
The Company’s Board of Directors has authorized the sale of up to $500 million of units under an at-the-market offering program. Subject to approval by the Bankruptcy Court, sales of units, if any, will be made under an equity distribution agreement by means of ordinary brokers’ transactions, through the facilities of a national securities exchange or facility thereof, a trading facility of a national securities association or an alternate trading system, to or through a market maker or directly on or through an electronic communication network, a “dark pool” or any similar market venue, at market prices, in block transactions, or as otherwise agreed with a sales agent. The Company expects to use the net proceeds from any sale of units for general corporate purposes, which may include, among other things, capital expenditures, acquisitions and the repayment of debt. No sales were made under the equity distribution agreement during the six months ended June 30, 2016. At June 30, 2016, units totaling approximately $455 million in aggregate offering price remained available to be sold under the agreement.
Dividends/Distributions
Under the Company’sPredecessor’s limited liability company agreement, unitholders arewere entitled to receive a distribution of available cash, which includesincluded cash on hand plus borrowings less any reserves established by the Company’sPredecessor’s Board of Directors to provide for the proper conduct of the Company’sPredecessor’s business (including reserves for future capital expenditures, including drilling, acquisitions and anticipated future credit needs) or to fund distributions, if any, over the next four quarters. In October 2015, the Company’sPredecessor’s Board of Directors determined to suspend payment of the Company’sPredecessor’s distribution. The Successor currently has no intention of paying cash dividends and any future payment of cash dividends would be subject to the restrictions in the Successor Credit Facility.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
The Company does not currently have any off-balance sheet arrangements.
Contingencies
See Part II. Item 1. “Legal Proceedings” for information regarding legal proceedings that the Company is party to and any contingencies related to these legal proceedings.
Commitments and Contractual Obligations
The Company has contractual obligations for long-term debt, operating leases and other long-term liabilities that were summarized in the table of contractual obligations in the 2015 AnnualMarch 31, 2017 Quarterly Report on Form 10-K.10-Q. During the sixthree months ended June 30, 2016,2017, the Company made approximately $774$650 million in net repayments of a portion of the borrowings outstanding under the Successor Credit Facilities. The Company’s filing of the Bankruptcy Petitions constituted an event of default that accelerated the Company’s obligations under the Credit Facilities, the Second Lien Notes and the senior notes.Facility. See Note 6 for additional information about the Company’s debt instruments.Successor Credit Facility. There have been no other significant changes to the Company’s contractual obligations since DecemberMarch 31, 2015.2017.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
The discussion and analysis of the Company’s financial condition and results of operations is based on the condensed consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. The preparation of these financial statements requires management of the Company to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities. These estimates and assumptions are based on management’s best estimates and judgment. Management evaluates its estimates and assumptions on an ongoing basis using historical experience and other factors that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. Such estimates and assumptions are adjusted when facts and circumstances dictate. Actual results may differ from these estimates and assumptions used in the preparation of the financial statements.
Recently Issued Accounting Standards
For a discussion of recently issued accounting standards, see Note 1.

61

Table of Contents
Item 2.Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Continued

Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Statements
This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements that are subject to a number of risks and uncertainties, many of which are beyond the Company’s control. These statements may include discussions about the Company’s:
business strategy;
acquisition and disposition strategy;
financial strategy;
risks associated withnew capital structure and the Chapter 11 process, includingadoption of fresh start accounting;
uncertainty of the Company’s inabilityability to develop, confirmimprove its financial results and consummate a plan under Chapter 11 or an alternative restructuring transaction;profitability following emergence from bankruptcy and other risks and uncertainties related to the Company’s emergence from bankruptcy;

60

Table of Contents
Item 2.Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Continued

inability to maintain relationships with suppliers, customers, employees and other third parties as a result of the Chapter 11 filing;following emergence from bankruptcy;
failure to satisfy the Company’s short- or long-term liquidity needs, including its inability to generate sufficient cash flow from operations or to obtain adequate financing to fund its capital expenditures and meet working capital needs and its ability to continue as a going concern;following emergence from bankruptcy;
large or multiple customer defaults on contractual obligations, including defaults resulting from actual or potential insolvencies;
ability to comply with covenants under the Successor Credit Facility;
effects of legal proceedings;
ability to resume payment of distributions in the future or maintain or grow them after such resumption;
drilling locations;
oil, natural gas and NGL reserves;
realized oil, natural gas and NGL prices;
production volumes;
capital expenditures;
economic and competitive advantages;
credit and capital market conditions;
regulatory changes;
lease operating expenses, general and administrative expenses and development costs;
future operating results, including results of acquired properties;
plans, objectives, expectations and intentions; and
integration of acquired businesses and operations and commencement of activities in the Company’s strategic alliances with GSO Capital Partners LP and Quantum Energy Partners, which may take longer than anticipated, may be more costly than anticipated as a result of unexpected factors or events and may have an unanticipated adverse effect on the Company’s business.taxes.
All of these types of statements, other than statements of historical fact included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, are forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements may be found in Item 2. In some cases, forward-looking statements can be identified by terminology such as “may,” “will,” “could,” “should,” “expect,” “plan,” “project,” “intend,” “anticipate,” “believe,” “estimate,” “predict,” “potential,” “pursue,” “target,” “continue,” the negative of such terms or other comparable terminology.
The forward-looking statements contained in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q are largely based on Company expectations, which reflect estimates and assumptions made by Company management. These estimates and assumptions reflect management’s best judgment based on currently known market conditions and other factors. Although the Company believes such estimates and assumptions to be reasonable, they are inherently uncertain and involve a number of risks and uncertainties beyond its control. In addition, management’s assumptions may prove to be inaccurate. The Company cautions that the forward-looking statements contained in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q are not guarantees of future performance, and it cannot assure any reader that such statements will be realized or the events will occur. Actual results may differ materially from those anticipated or implied in forward-looking statements due to factors set forth in Item 1A. “Risk Factors” in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015,2016, and elsewhere in the Annual Report. The forward-looking statements speak only as of the date made and, other than as required by law, the Company undertakes no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statement, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

62

Table of Contents
Item 2.Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Continued

The forward-looking statements related to the Plan involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties, assumptions and other factors that may cause the Company’s actual results, performance or achievements to be materially different from any results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by other forward-looking statements contained in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, including but not limited to potential adverse effects related to the following: delisting of the Company’s units on NASDAQ; reorganization and related effects on the Company’s outstanding debt and outstanding units; potential effects of the industry downturn on the Company’s business, financial condition and results of operations; potential limitations on the Company’s ability to maintain contracts and other critical business relationships; requirements for adequate liquidity to fund the Company’s operations in the future, including obtaining sufficient financing on acceptable terms; and other matters related to the reorganization and the Company’s indebtedness, including any defaults related thereto.
Item 3.Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
The Company’s primary market risks are attributable to fluctuations in commodity prices and interest rates. These risks can affect the Company’s business, financial condition, operating results and cash flows. See below for quantitative and qualitative information about these risks.
The following should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and related notes included elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and in the Company’s 20152016 Annual Report on Form 10-K. The reference to a “Note” herein refers to the accompanying Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements contained in Item 1. “Financial Statements.”

61

Table of Contents
Item 3.    Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk - Continued

Commodity Price Risk
The Company’s most significant market risk relates to prices of oil, natural gas and NGL. The Company expects commodity prices to remain volatile and unpredictable. As commodity prices decline or rise significantly, revenues and cash flows are likewise affected. In addition, future declines in commodity prices may result in noncash write-downs of the Company’s carrying amounts of its assets.
Historically, the Company has hedged a portion of its forecasted production to reduce exposure to fluctuations in oil and natural gas prices and provide long-term cash flow predictability to manage its business, service debt, and if and when resumed, pay distributions.business. The Company does not enter into derivative contracts for trading purposes. The appropriate level of production to be hedged is an ongoing consideration based on a variety of factors, including among other things, current and future expected commodity market prices, and the Company’s overall risk profile, including leverage and size and scale considerations. considerations, as well as any requirements for or restrictions on levels of hedging contained in any credit facility or other debt instrument applicable at the time. In addition, when commodity prices are depressed and forward commodity price curves are flat or in backwardation, the Company may determine that the benefit of hedging its anticipated production at these levels is outweighed by its resultant inability to obtain higher revenues for its production if commodity prices recover during the duration of the contracts. As a result, the appropriate percentage of production volumes to be hedged may change over time.
At June 30, 2017, the fair value of fixed price swaps and collars was a net asset of approximately $33 million. A 10% increase in the index oil and natural gas prices above the June 30, 2017, prices would result in a net liability of approximately $30 million, which represents a decrease in the fair value of approximately $63 million; conversely, a 10% decrease in the index oil and natural gas prices below the June 30, 2017, prices would result in a net asset of approximately $95 million, which represents an increase in the fair value of approximately $62 million.
At December 31, 2016, the fair value of fixed price swaps and collars was a net liability of approximately $85 million. A 10% increase in the index oil and natural gas prices above the December 31, 2016, prices would result in a net liability of approximately $183 million, which represents a decrease in the fair value of approximately $98 million; conversely, a 10% decrease in the index oil and natural gas prices below the December 31, 2016, prices would result in a net asset of approximately $13 million, which represents an increase in the fair value of approximately $98 million.
The Company does not enter into derivative contracts for trading purposes.
In April 2016determines the fair value of its oil and May 2016, in connection with the Company’s restructuring efforts, LINN Energy canceled (priornatural gas derivatives utilizing pricing models that use a variety of techniques, including market quotes and pricing analysis. Inputs to the contract settlement dates) allpricing models include publicly available prices and forward price curves generated from a compilation of its derivative contracts for net proceedsdata gathered from third parties. Company management validates the data provided by third parties by understanding the pricing models used, obtaining market values from other pricing sources, analyzing pricing data in certain situations and confirming that those instruments trade in active markets.
The prices of approximately $1.2 billion. The net proceeds were used to make permanent repayments of a portion of the borrowings outstanding under the LINN Credit Facility. Also, in May 2016, as a result of the Chapter 11 proceedings, Berry’s counterparties canceled (prior to the contract settlement dates) all of Berry’s derivative contracts (with the exception of a contract consisting of 1,840 MMMBtu ofoil, natural gas basis swaps for 2016) for net proceeds of approximately $2 million. The net proceeds were used to make permanent repayments of a portion of the borrowings outstanding under the Berry Credit Facility. In July 2016, Berry’s remaining derivative contract was canceled by the counterparty. LINN Energy and/or Berry may enter into new derivative contracts during the pendency of the Chapter 11 proceedings to the extent: 1) they are permitted by order of the Bankruptcy Court, 2) acceptable agreements with counterparties can be reached and 3)NGL have been extremely volatile, and the Company determinesexpects this volatility to continue. Prices for these commodities may fluctuate widely in response to relatively minor changes in the supply of and demand for such commodities, market uncertainty and a variety of additional factors that it is appropriateare beyond its control. Actual gains or losses recognized related to hedge given its analysis of the factors identified above.
As of June 30, 2016, the Company had 1,840 MMMBtu of natural gas basis swaps for 2016 and no derivative contracts for years subsequent to 2016. See Note 7 for details about the Company’s derivative instruments.contracts depend exclusively on the price of the commodities on the specified settlement dates provided by the derivative contracts. Additionally, the Company cannot be assured that its counterparties will be able to perform under its derivative contracts. If a counterparty fails to perform and the derivative arrangement is terminated, the Company’s cash flows could be impacted.
Interest Rate Risk
At June 30, 2016,2017, the Company had debt outstanding under its credit facilities and term loanthe Successor Credit Facility of approximately $2.8 billion$183 million which incurred interest at floating rates (see Note 6).rates. A 1% increase in the respective market rates would result in an estimated $28$2 million increase in annual interest expense.

63

Table of Contents
Item 3.    Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk - Continued

At December 31, 2015,2016, the Company had debt outstanding under its credit facilities and term loanthe Predecessor Credit Facility of approximately $3.6$1.9 billion which incurred interest at floating rates. A 1% increase in the respective market rates would result in an estimated $36$19 million increase in annual interest expense.

62

Table of Contents

Item 4.    Controls and Procedures
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
The Company maintains disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the Company’s reports under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”) is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to management, including the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, and the Company’s Audit Committee of the Board of Directors, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. In designing and evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures, management recognizes that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives, and management is required to apply its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures.
The Company carried out an evaluation under the supervision and with the participation of its management, including its Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of its disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on this evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of June 30, 2016.2017.
Changes in the Company’s Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
The Company’s management is also responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) of the Exchange Act. The Company’s internal controls were designed to provide reasonable assurance as to the reliability of its financial reporting and the preparation and presentation of the condensed consolidated financial statements for external purposes in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not detect or prevent misstatements. Projections of any evaluation of the effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
There were no changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting during the second quarter of 20162017 that materially affected, or were reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

63

Table of Contents

Part II – Other Information
Item 1.Legal Proceedings
On May 11, 2016, the Debtors filed Bankruptcy Petitions for relief under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code in the Bankruptcy Court. The Debtors’ Chapter 11 cases were administered jointly under the caption In re Linn Energy, LLC, et al., Case No. 16‑60040. On January 27, 2017, the Bankruptcy Court entered the Confirmation Order. Consummation of the Plan was subject to certain conditions set forth in the Plan. On the Effective Date, all of the conditions were satisfied or waived and the Plan became effective and was implemented in accordance with its terms. The LINN Debtors Chapter 11 cases will remain pending until the final resolution of all outstanding claims.
The commencement of the Chapter 11 proceedings automatically stayed certain actions against the Company, including actions to collect prepetition liabilities or to exercise control over the property of the Company’s bankruptcy estates. For certain statewide class action royalty payment disputes, the Company filed notices advising that it had filed for bankruptcy protection and seeking a stay, which was granted. In addition,However, the Company is, involved in various other disputes arisingand will continue to be until the final resolution of all claims, subject to certain contested matters and adversary proceedings stemming from the Chapter 11 proceedings.
In March 2017, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association (“Wells Fargo”), the administrative agent under the Predecessor Credit Facility, filed a motion in the ordinary courseBankruptcy Court seeking payment of business. post-petition default interest of approximately $31 million. The Company has vigorously disputed that Wells Fargo is entitled to any default interest based on the plain language of the Plan and Confirmation Order. A hearing was held on April 27, 2017, and the parties are awaiting a ruling from the Bankruptcy Court on this matter.
The Company is not currently a party to any litigation or pending claims that it believes would have a material adverse effect on its overall business, financial position, results of operations or liquidity; however, cash flow could be significantly impacted in the reporting periods in which such matters are resolved.
The commencement of the Chapter 11 proceedings automatically stayed certain actions against the Company, including actions to collect prepetition liabilities or to exercise control over the property of the Company’s bankruptcy estates. The Company intends to seek authority to pay all general claims in the ordinary course of business notwithstanding the commencement of the Chapter 11 proceedings in a manner consistent with the Restructuring Support Agreement. The Plan in the Chapter 11 proceedings, if confirmed, will provide for the treatment of claims against the Company’s bankruptcy estates, including prepetition liabilities that have not otherwise been satisfied or addressed during the Chapter 11 proceedings. See above under Item 2. “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Chapter 11 Proceedings” for information about the Company’s entry into the Restructuring Support Agreement.
Item 1A.Risk Factors
Our business has many risks. Factors that could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition, operating results or liquidity and the trading price of our unitsshares are described in Item 1A. “Risk Factors” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015. Except as set forth below, as2016. As of the date of this report, these risk factors have not changed materially. This information should be considered carefully, together with other information in this report and other reports and materials we file with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission.
Any plan of reorganization that we may implement will be based in large part upon assumptions and analyses developed by us. If these assumptions and analyses prove to be incorrect, our plan may be unsuccessful in its execution.
Any plan of reorganization that we may implement could affect both our capital structure and the ownership, structure and operation of our business and will reflect assumptions and analyses based on our management’s experience and perception of historical trends, current conditions and expected future developments, as well as other factors that we consider appropriate under the circumstances. Whether actual future results and developments will be consistent with management’s expectations and assumptions depends on a number of factors, including but not limited to (i) our ability to change substantially our capital structure; (ii) our ability to obtain adequate liquidity and financing sources; (iii) our ability to maintain customers’ confidence in our viability as a continuing entity and to attract and retain sufficient business from them; (iv) our ability to retain key employees; and (v) the overall strength and stability of general economic conditions of the financial and oil and natural gas industries, both in the U.S. and in global markets. The failure of any of these factors could materially adversely affect the successful reorganization of our business.
In addition, any plan of reorganization will rely upon financial projections, including with respect to revenues, EBITDA, capital expenditures, debt service and cash flow. Financial forecasts are necessarily speculative, and it is likely that one or more of the assumptions and estimates that are the basis of these financial forecasts will not be accurate. In our case, the forecasts will be even more speculative than normal, because they may involve fundamental changes in the nature of our capital structure. Accordingly, we expect that our actual financial condition and results of operations will differ, perhaps materially, from what we have anticipated. Consequently, there can be no assurance that the results or developments contemplated by any plan of reorganization we may implement will occur or, even if they do occur, that they will have the anticipated effects on us and our subsidiaries or our business or operations. The failure of any such results or developments to materialize as anticipated could materially adversely affect the successful execution of any plan of reorganization.
We have substantial liquidity needs and may not be able to obtain sufficient liquidity to confirm a plan of reorganization and exit bankruptcy.
Although we have lowered our capital budget and reduced the scale of our operations significantly, our business remains capital intensive. In addition to the cash requirements necessary to fund ongoing operations, we have incurred significant professional fees and other costs in connection with our Chapter 11 proceedings and expect that we will continue to incur significant

65

Table of Contents
Item 1A.    Risk Factors - Continued

professional fees and costs throughout the Chapter 11 proceedings. There are no assurances that our current liquidity is sufficient to allow us to satisfy our obligations related to the Chapter 11 proceedings, allow us to proceed with the confirmation of a Chapter 11 plan of reorganization and allow us to emerge from bankruptcy. We can provide no assurance that we will be able to secure additional interim financing or exit financing sufficient to meet our liquidity needs.
In connection with a plan of reorganization, we may, for federal and state income tax purposes, trigger an actual or deemed sale of all or a portion of our properties which may result in unfavorable tax consequences.
In connection with a plan of reorganization, we may, for federal and state income tax purposes, trigger an actual or deemed sale of all or a portion of our properties and use the proceeds to satisfy debt. Our unitholders may be allocated substantial taxable income or loss with respect to such a sale, and our unitholders’ share of our taxable income and gain (or specific items thereof) from such sale may be substantially greater than, or our tax losses and deductions (or specific items thereof) from such sale may be substantially less than, our unitholders’ interest in our economic profits because of allocations under section 704(c) of the Internal Revenue Code.
We are subject to the risks and uncertainties associated with Chapter 11 proceedings.
For the duration of our Chapter 11 proceedings, our operations and our ability to develop and execute our business plan, as well as our continuation as a going concern, are subject to the risks and uncertainties associated with bankruptcy. These risks include the following:
our ability to develop, confirm and consummate a Chapter 11 plan or alternative restructuring transaction;
our ability to obtain court approval with respect to motions filed in Chapter 11 proceedings from time to time;
our ability to maintain our relationships with our suppliers, service providers, customers, employees and other third parties;
our ability to maintain contracts that are critical to our operations;
our ability to execute our business plan;
the ability of third parties to seek and obtain court approval to terminate contracts and other agreements with us;
the ability of third parties to seek and obtain court approval to terminate or shorten the exclusivity period for us to propose and confirm a Chapter 11 plan, to appoint a Chapter 11 trustee, or to convert the Chapter 11 proceedings to a Chapter 7 proceeding; and
the actions and decisions of our creditors and other third parties who have interests in our Chapter 11 proceedings that may be inconsistent with our plans.
These risks and uncertainties could affect our business and operations in various ways. For example, negative events associated with our Chapter 11 proceedings could adversely affect our relationships with our suppliers, service providers, customers, employees, and other third parties, which in turn could adversely affect our operations and financial condition. Also, we need the prior approval of the Bankruptcy Court for transactions outside the ordinary course of business, which may limit our ability to respond timely to certain events or take advantage of certain opportunities. Because of the risks and uncertainties associated with our Chapter 11 proceedings, we cannot accurately predict or quantify the ultimate impact of events that will occur during our Chapter 11 proceedings that may be inconsistent with our plans.
Operating under Bankruptcy Court protection for a long period of time may harm our business.
Our future results are dependent upon the successful confirmation and implementation of a plan of reorganization. A long period of operations under Bankruptcy Court protection could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and liquidity. So long as the Chapter 11 proceedings continue, our senior management will be required to spend a significant amount of time and effort dealing with the reorganization instead of focusing exclusively on our business operations. A prolonged period of operating under Bankruptcy Court protection also may make it more difficult to retain management and other key personnel necessary for the success and growth of our business. In addition, the longer the Chapter 11 proceedings continue, the more likely it is that our customers and suppliers will lose confidence in our ability to reorganize our business successfully and will seek to establish alternative commercial relationships.
Furthermore, so long as the Chapter 11 proceedings continue, we will be required to incur substantial costs for professional fees and other expenses associated with the administration of the Chapter 11 proceedings. The Chapter 11 proceedings may also

66

Table of Contents
Item 1A.    Risk Factors - Continued

require us to seek debtor-in-possession financing to fund operations. If we are unable to obtain such financing on favorable terms or at all, our chances of successfully reorganizing our business may be seriously jeopardized, the likelihood that we instead will be required to liquidate our assets may be enhanced, and, as a result, any securities in us could become further devalued or become worthless.
Furthermore, we cannot predict the ultimate amount of all settlement terms for the liabilities that will be subject to a plan of reorganization. Even once a plan of reorganization is approved and implemented, our operating results may be adversely affected by the possible reluctance of prospective lenders and other counterparties to do business with a company that recently emerged from Chapter 11 proceedings.
The Restructuring Support Agreement provides that our common units representing limited liability company interests (“units”) will be canceled in our Chapter 11 proceedings.
We have a significant amount of indebtedness that is senior to our existing units in our capital structure. The Restructuring Support Agreement provides that our existing equity will be canceled in our Chapter 11 proceedings and will be entitled to a limited recovery, if any. Any trading in our units during the pendency of the Chapter 11 proceedings is highly speculative and poses substantial risks to purchasers of our units.
We may not be able to obtain confirmation of a Chapter 11 plan of reorganization.
To emerge successfully from Bankruptcy Court protection as a viable entity, we must meet certain statutory requirements with respect to adequacy of disclosure with respect to the Plan, solicit and obtain the requisite acceptances of such a plan and fulfill other statutory conditions for confirmation of such a plan, which have not occurred to date. The confirmation process is subject to numerous, unanticipated potential delays, including a delay in the Bankruptcy Court’s commencement of the confirmation hearing regarding our Plan.
Prior to the Chapter 11 filing, we entered into the Restructuring Support Agreement with certain of our creditors. The restructuring transactions contemplated by the Restructuring Support Agreement will be effectuated through the Plan. However, we may not receive the requisite acceptances of constituencies in the Chapter 11 proceedings to confirm our Plan. Even if the requisite acceptances of the Plan are received, the Bankruptcy Court may not confirm such a plan. The precise requirements and evidentiary showing for confirming a plan, notwithstanding its rejection by one or more impaired classes of claims or equity interests, depends upon a number of factors including, without limitation, the status and seniority of the claims or equity interests in the rejecting class (i.e., unsecured claims or secured claims, subordinated or senior claims).
If a Chapter 11 plan of reorganization is not confirmed by the Bankruptcy Court, it is unclear whether we would be able to reorganize our business and what, if anything, holders of claims against us would ultimately receive with respect to their claims.
The Restructuring Support Agreement is subject to significant conditions and milestones that may be difficult for us to satisfy.
There are certain material conditions we must satisfy under the Restructuring Support Agreement, including the timely satisfaction of milestones in the anticipated Chapter 11 proceedings, such as confirmation of the Plan and effectiveness of the Plan. Our ability to timely complete such milestones is subject to risks and uncertainties that may be beyond our control.
If the Restructuring Support Agreement is terminated, our ability to confirm and consummate the Plan could be materially and adversely affected.
The Restructuring Support Agreement contains a number of termination events, upon the occurrence of which certain parties to the Restructuring Support Agreement may terminate the agreement. If the Restructuring Support Agreement is terminated, each of the parties thereto will be released from their obligations in accordance with the terms of the Restructuring Support Agreement. Such termination may result in the loss of support for the Plan by the parties to the Restructuring Support Agreement, which could adversely affect our ability to confirm and consummate the Plan. If the Plan is not consummated, there can be no assurance that any new Plan would be as favorable to holders of claims as the current Plan.

67

Table of Contents
Item 1A.    Risk Factors - Continued

Our long-term liquidity requirements and the adequacy of our capital resources are difficult to predict at this time.
We face uncertainty regarding the adequacy of our liquidity and capital resources and have extremely limited, if any, access to additional financing. In addition to the cash requirements necessary to fund ongoing operations, we have incurred significant professional fees and other costs in connection with preparation for the Chapter 11 proceedings and expect to continue to incur significant professional fees and costs throughout our Chapter 11 proceedings. We cannot assure you that cash on hand and cash flow from operations will be sufficient to continue to fund our operations and allow us to satisfy our obligations related to the Chapter 11 proceedings until we are able to emerge from our Chapter 11 proceedings.
Our liquidity, including our ability to meet our ongoing operational obligations, is dependent upon, among other things: (i) our ability to comply with the terms and conditions of any cash collateral order that may be entered by the Bankruptcy Court in connection with the Chapter 11 proceedings, (ii) our ability to maintain adequate cash on hand, (iii) our ability to generate cash flow from operations, (iv) our ability to develop, confirm and consummate a Chapter 11 plan or other alternative restructuring transaction, and (v) the cost, duration and outcome of the Chapter 11 proceedings.
As a result of the Chapter 11 proceedings, our financial results may be volatile and may not reflect historical trends.
During the Chapter 11 proceedings, we expect our financial results to continue to be volatile as restructuring activities and expenses, contract terminations and rejections, and claims assessments significantly impact our consolidated financial statements. As a result, our historical financial performance is likely not indicative of our financial performance after the date of the bankruptcy filing. In addition, if we emerge from Chapter 11, the amounts reported in subsequent consolidated financial statements may materially change relative to historical consolidated financial statements, including as a result of revisions to our operating plans pursuant to a plan of reorganization. We also may be required to adopt fresh start accounting, in which case our assets and liabilities will be recorded at fair value as of the fresh start reporting date, which may differ materially from the recorded values of assets and liabilities on our consolidated balance sheets. Our financial results after the application of fresh start accounting also may be different from historical trends.
We may be subject to claims that will not be discharged in the Chapter 11 proceedings, which could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.
The Bankruptcy Code provides that the confirmation of a plan of reorganization discharges a debtor from substantially all debts arising prior to confirmation. With few exceptions, all claims that arose prior to May 12, 2016, or before confirmation of the plan of reorganization (i) would be subject to compromise and/or treatment under the plan of reorganization and/or (ii) would be discharged in accordance with the terms of the Plan. Any claims not ultimately discharged through the Plan could be asserted against the reorganized entities and may have an adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations on a post-reorganization basis.
We may experience increased levels of employee attrition as a result of the Chapter 11 proceedings.
As a result of the Chapter 11 proceedings, we may experience increased levels of employee attrition, and our employees likely will face considerable distraction and uncertainty. A loss of key personnel or material erosion of employee morale could adversely affect our business and results of operations. Our ability to engage, motivate and retain key employees or take other measures intended to motivate and incent key employees to remain with us through the pendency of the Chapter 11 proceedings is limited by restrictions on implementation of incentive programs under the Bankruptcy Code. The loss of services of members of our senior management team could impair our ability to execute our strategy and implement operational initiatives, which would be likely to have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
In certain instances, a Chapter 11 case may be converted to a case under Chapter 7 of the Bankruptcy Code.
There can be no assurance as to whether we will successfully reorganize and emerge from the Chapter 11 proceedings or, if we do successfully reorganize, as to when we would emerge from the Chapter 11 proceedings.
If the Bankruptcy Court finds that it would be in the best interest of creditors and/or the Debtors, the Bankruptcy Court may convert our anticipated Chapter 11 bankruptcy case to a case under Chapter 7 of the Bankruptcy Code. In such event, a Chapter 7 trustee would be appointed or elected to liquidate the Debtors’ assets for distribution in accordance with the priorities

68

Table of Contents
Item 1A.    Risk Factors - Continued

established by the Bankruptcy Code. The Debtors believe that liquidation under Chapter 7 would result in significantly smaller distributions being made to the Debtors’ creditors than those provided for in a Chapter 11 plan because of (i) the likelihood that the assets would have to be sold or otherwise disposed of in a disorderly fashion over a short period of time rather than reorganizing or selling in a controlled manner the Debtors’ businesses as a going concern, (ii) additional administrative expenses involved in the appointment of a Chapter 7 trustee, and (iii) additional expenses and claims, some of which would be entitled to priority, that would be generated during the liquidation and from the rejection of leases and other executory contracts in connection with a cessation of operations.
We have significant exposure to fluctuations in commodity prices since none of our estimated future production is covered by commodity derivatives and we may not be able to enter into commodity derivatives covering our estimated future production on favorable terms or at all.
During the Chapter 11 proceedings, our ability to enter into new commodity derivatives covering estimated future production will be dependent upon either entering into unsecured hedges or obtaining Bankruptcy Court approval to enter into secured hedges. As a result, we may not be able to enter into additional commodity derivatives covering our production in future periods on favorable terms or at all. If we cannot or choose not to enter into commodity derivatives in the future, we could be more affected by changes in commodity prices than our competitors who engage in hedging arrangements. Our inability to hedge the risk of low commodity prices in the future, on favorable terms or at all, could have a material adverse impact on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Our units are no longer listed on a national securities exchange and are quoted only in over-the-counter markets, which carries substantial risks and could continue to negatively impact our unit price, volatility and liquidity.
As a result of our failure to comply with the NASDAQ Global Select Market (“NASDAQ”) continued listing requirements, on May 24, 2016, our units began trading over the counter on the OTC Markets Group Inc.’s Pink marketplace under the trading symbol “LINEQ.”
Our delisting from the NASDAQ and commencement of trading on the OTC Pink Sheets marketplace has resulted and may continue to result in a reduction in some or all of the following, each of which could have a material adverse effect on our unitholders:
the liquidity of our units;
the market price of our units;
our ability to obtain financing for the continuation of our operations;
the number of institutional and other investors that will consider investing in our units;
the number of market makers in our units;
the availability of information concerning the trading prices and volume of our units; and
the number of broker-dealers willing to execute trades in our units.
Item 2.Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
The Company’s Board of Directors has authorized the repurchase of up to $250$200 million of the Company’s outstanding unitsshares of Class A common stock. Purchases may be made from time to time onin negotiated purchases or in the open market, including through Rule 10b5-1 prearranged stock trading plans designed to facilitate the repurchase of the Company's shares during times it would not otherwise be in the market due to self-imposed trading blackout periods or in negotiated purchases.possible possession of material nonpublic information. The timing and amounts of any such repurchases are at the discretion of management,shares will be subject to market conditions and certain other factors, and will be in accordance with applicable securities laws and other legal requirements.requirements, including restrictions contained in the Company's then current credit facility. The repurchase plan does not obligate the Company to acquire any specific number of unitsshares and may be discontinued at any time.

64

Table of Contents
Item 2.    Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds - Continued

The Company did not repurchase any unitsfollowing sets forth information with respect to the Company’s repurchases of its shares of Class A common stock during the six months ended June 30, 2016, and assecond quarter of June 30, 2016, the entire amount remained available for unit repurchase under the program.2017:
Period Total Number of Shares Purchased Average Price Paid Per Share Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs 
Approximate Dollar Value of Shares that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs (1)
        (in thousands)
         
April 1 – 30  $
  $
May 1 – 31  $
  $
June 1 – 30 7,540 $30.48
 7,540 $199,770
(1)
On June 1, 2017, the Company’s Board of Directors announced that it had authorized the repurchase of up to $75 million of the Company’s outstanding shares of Class A common stock. On June 28, 2017, the Company’s Board of Directors announced that it had authorized an increase in the previously announced share repurchase program to up to a total of $200 million of the Company’s outstanding shares of Class A common stock.
Item 3.Defaults Upon Senior Securities
See Part I. Item 1. Note 2 to the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements entitled “Chapter 11 Proceedings, Ability to Continue as a Going Concern and Covenant Violations” which is incorporated in this item by reference.None
Item 4.Mine Safety Disclosures
Not applicable
Item 5.Other Information
None

Item 6.Exhibits
65

Table of Contents

Item 6. Exhibits

Exhibit Number Description
   
3.12.1Certificate of Formation ofPurchase and Sale Agreement, dated April 30, 2017, by and between Linn Energy Holdings, LLC, (nowLinn Operating, LLC and Jonah Energy LLC (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to Current Report on Form 8-K filed on May 4, 2017)
2.2Purchase and Sale Agreement, dated May 23, 2017, by and among Linn Energy LLC)Holdings, LLC, Linn Operating, LLC, Linn Midstream, LLC and Berry Petroleum Company, LLC (incorporated hereinby reference to Exhibit 2.1 to Current Report on Form 8-K filed on May 30, 2017)
2.3*†Purchase and Sale Agreement, dated May 25, 2017, by and between Linn Energy Holdings, LLC, Linn Operating, LLC and Denbury Onshore, LLC
2.4*†First Amendment, dated June 30, 2017, to Purchase and Sale Agreement, dated May 25, 2017, by and between Linn Energy Holdings, LLC, Linn Operating, LLC and Denbury Onshore, LLC
2.5*†Purchase and Sale Agreement, dated June 1, 2017, by and between Linn Energy Holdings, LLC, Linn Operating, LLC, Linn Midstream, LLC and Bridge Energy LLC
2.6*†First Amendment, dated July 10, 2017, to Purchase and Sale Agreement, dated June 1, 2017, by and between Linn Energy Holdings, LLC, Linn Operating, LLC, Linn Midstream, LLC and Bridge Energy LLC
3.1Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Linn Energy, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to Registration Statement on Form S‑1 (File No. 333‑125501)S-8 filed on June 3, 2005)February 28, 2017)
3.2Certificate of Amendment to Certificate of FormationBylaws of Linn Energy, Holdings, LLC (now Linn Energy, LLC)Inc. (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to Registration Statement on Form S‑1 (File No. 333-125501)S-8 filed on June 3, 2005)February 28, 2017)
3.310.1*Third AmendedFirst Amendment and Restated Limited Liability Company Agreement of Linn Energy, LLC dated September 3, 2010 (incorporated herein by referenceConsent to Exhibit 3.1 to Current Report on Form 8-K filed on September 7, 2010)
3.4Amendment No. 1, dated April 23, 2013, to Third Amended and Restated LLC Agreement of Linn Energy, LLC, dated September 3, 2010 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on April 25, 2013)
10.1Settlement Agreement, dated as of April 4, 2016 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Current Report on Form 8-K filed on April 5, 2016)
10.2Eighth Amendment to Sixth Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated as of April 12, 2016,May 31, 2017, to Credit Agreement and Security Agreement dated as of February 28, 2017, among Linn Energy Holdco II LLC, as borrower, Linn Energy Holdco LLC, as parent, Linn Energy, Inc., the subsidiary guarantors named therein,party thereto, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as administrative agent and each of the lenders party thereto (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Current Report on Form 8-K filed on April 15, 2016)
10.310.2*Twelfth Amendment to Second AmendedEngineering and Restated CreditConstruction Agreement, dated June 13, 2017, between Linn Midstream, LLC (now known as of April 12, 2016, among Berry Petroleum Company, LLC, as borrower, each of the lenders party theretoBlue Mountain Midstream LLC) and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as administrative agent (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to Current Report on Form 8-K filed on April 15, 2016)BCCK Engineering Incorporated
10.410.3*Restructuring SupportEquipment Supply Agreement, dated June 13, 2017, between Linn Midstream, LLC (now known as of May 10, 2016,Blue Mountain Midstream LLC) and BCCK Engineering Incorporated
10.4*Contribution Agreement, dated June 27, 2017, by and among the Debtors and the supporting parties thereto (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Current Report on Form 8-K filed on May 11, 2016)
10.5First Amendment to Settlement Agreement, dated as of July 12, 2016 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Current Report on Form 8-K filed on July 18, 2016)
10.6*First Amendment to Linn Energy Holdings, LLC, Severance Plan, dated as of July 22, 2016Linn Operating, LLC, Citizen Energy II, LLC and Roan Resources LLC
31.1*Section 302Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Mark E. Ellis, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of Linn Energy, LLC
31.2*Section 302Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of David B. Rottino, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Linn Energy, LLC
32.1*Section 9061350 Certification of Mark E. Ellis, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of Linn Energy, LLC
32.2*Section 9061350 Certification of David B. Rottino, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Linn Energy, LLC
101.INS**XBRL Instance Document
101.SCH**XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
101.CAL**XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
101.DEF**XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document
101.LAB**XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document
101.PRE**XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document
*Filed herewith.
**Furnished herewith.
Pursuant to Item 601(b)(2) of Regulation S-K, the schedules and exhibits to the PSA have not been filed herewith. The registrant agrees to furnish supplementally copies of any omitted schedules and exhibits to the Securities and Exchange Commission upon request.

66

Table of Contents

SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
 LINN ENERGY, LLCINC.
 (Registrant)
  
Date: August 4, 20163, 2017/s/ Darren R. Schluter
 Darren R. Schluter
 Vice President and Controller
 (Duly Authorized Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)
  
  
Date: August 4, 20163, 2017/s/ David B. Rottino
 David B. Rottino
 Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
 (Principal Financial Officer)


7167