UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q


þ		QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended ~~September 30, 2008~~March 31, 2009


o		TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from to

Commission File Number 1-15817

OLD NATIONAL BANCORP

(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)


INDIANA		35-1539838
(State or other jurisdiction of		(I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization)		Identification No.)

1One Main Street		~~47708~~
Evansville, Indiana		~~(Zip Code)~~47708
(Address of principal executive offices)		(Zip Code)

(812) 464-1294
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months, and (2) has been subject to the filing requirements for at least the past 90 days. Yesþ Noo

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (s232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yesþ Noo

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.


Large accelerated filerþ	Accelerated filero	~~Accelerated filer~~o	Non-accelerated filero	Smaller reporting companyo
		(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yeso Noþ

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock. The Registrant has one class of common stock (no par value) with ~~66,285,000~~66,411,000 shares outstanding at ~~September 30, 2008.~~March 31, 2009.

OLD NATIONAL BANCORP

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE ~~SHEET~~SHEETS


	September 30,			December 31,			September 30,			March 31,			December 31,			March 31,
(dollars and shares in thousands, except per share data)	2008			2007			2007			2009			2008			2008
	(unaudited)						(unaudited)			(unaudited)						(unaudited)
Assets
Cash and due from banks	$	166,078		$	255,192		$	192,921		$	131,507		$	162,893		$	228,734
Federal funds sold and resell agreements		9,292			—			179			—			6			—
Money market investments		18,591			8,480			4,074			42,588			30,113			72,843

Total cash and cash equivalents		193,961			263,672			197,174			174,095			193,012			301,577
Investment securities — available-for-sale, at fair value
U.S. Government-sponsored entities and agencies		319,793			688,947			661,221			1,019,561			389,278			469,311
Mortgage-backed securities		1,108,944			940,967			960,462			1,045,142			1,081,619			1,012,127
States and political subdivisions		327,370			294,884			259,581			485,083			482,204			294,310
Other securities		167,645			215,843			205,096			160,517			171,925			210,567

Investment securities — available-for-sale		1,923,752			2,140,641			2,086,360			2,710,303			2,125,026			1,986,315
Investment securities — held-to-maturity, at amortized cost (fair value $104,641, $124,504 and $130,053 respectively)		105,316			126,769			134,444
Investment securities — held-to-maturity, at amortized cost (fair value $95,334, $100,831 and $120,067 respectively)											92,989			99,661			119,380
Federal Home Loan Bank stock, at cost		41,090			41,090			41,170			41,090			41,090			41,090
Residential loans held for sale, at fair value		11,118			13,000			13,313			19,609			17,155			10,155
Loans:
Commercial		1,799,764			1,694,736			1,692,521			1,809,431			1,897,966			1,740,278
Commercial real estate		1,170,775			1,270,408			1,308,287			1,133,851			1,154,916			1,235,302
Residential real estate		508,112			533,448			539,297			488,539			496,526			528,534
Consumer credit, net of unearned income		1,203,265			1,187,764			1,210,260			1,189,711			1,210,951			1,176,708

Total loans		4,681,916			4,686,356			4,750,365			4,621,532			4,760,359			4,680,822
Allowance for loan losses		(63,466	)		(56,463	)		(64,138	)		(71,775	)		(67,087	)		(72,250	)

Net loans		4,618,450			4,629,893			4,686,227			4,549,757			4,693,272			4,608,572

Premises and equipment, net		46,658			48,652			47,277			58,586			44,625			45,775
Accrued interest receivable		43,714			50,277			50,427			48,248			49,030			44,489
Goodwill		159,198			159,198			159,198			167,791			159,198			159,198
Other intangible assets		28,567			31,778			32,679			37,813			27,628			31,102
Company-owned life insurance		222,380			214,486			211,853			223,816			223,126			216,917
Assets held for sale		2,996			3,969			31,065			1,992			1,992			2,996
Other assets		171,088			122,701			141,298			229,979			199,075			155,900

Total assets	$	7,568,288		$	7,846,126		$	7,832,485		$	8,356,068		$	7,873,890		$	7,723,466

Liabilities
Deposits:
Noninterest-bearing demand	$	845,705		$	855,449		$	840,501		$	1,039,333		$	888,578		$	861,114
Interest-bearing:
NOW		1,222,967			1,410,667			1,427,485			1,257,480			1,292,574			1,312,216
Savings		923,202			774,054			653,448			918,837			874,602			923,367
Money market		448,667			562,127			690,391			522,841			420,821			517,776
Time (including $48,875, $0 and $0, respectively, at fair value)		1,905,680			2,061,086			2,262,717
Time (including $6,034, $49,309 and $41,429, respectively, at fair value)											2,116,247			1,945,712			1,732,012

Total deposits		5,346,221			5,663,383			5,874,542			5,854,738			5,422,287			5,346,485
Short-term borrowings		541,648			638,247			527,033			827,092			649,623			640,503
Other borrowings		837,315			656,722			612,129			809,958			834,867			834,888
Accrued expenses and other liabilities		207,751			234,893			171,362			232,488			236,248			226,197

Total liabilities		6,932,935			7,193,245			7,185,066			7,724,276			7,143,025			7,048,073

Shareholders’ Equity
Preferred stock, 2,000 shares authorized, no shares issued or outstanding		—			—			—
Common stock, $1 stated value, 150,000 shares authorized, 66,285, 66,205 and 66,200 shares issued and outstanding, respectively		66,285			66,205			66,200
Preferred stock, series A, 1,000 shares authorized, no shares issued or outstanding											—			—			—
Preferred stock, series T, no par value, $1,000 liquidation value, 1,000 shares authorized, 0, 100 and 0 shares issued and outstanding, respectively											—			97,358			—
Common stock, $1 stated value, 150,000 shares authorized, 66,411, 66,321 and 66,202 shares issued and outstanding, respectively											66,411			66,321			66,202
Capital surplus		566,067			563,675			562,959			571,755			569,875			564,397
Retained earnings		59,684			34,346			41,885			41,079			50,815			53,563
Accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of tax		(56,683	)		(11,345	)		(23,625	)		(47,453	)		(53,504	)		(8,769	)

Total shareholders’ equity		635,353			652,881			647,419			631,792			730,865			675,393

Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity	$	7,568,288		$	7,846,126		$	7,832,485		$	8,356,068		$	7,873,890		$	7,723,466

OLD NATIONAL BANCORP

CONSOLIDATED ~~STATEMENT~~STATEMENTS OF INCOME (unaudited)


	Three Months Ended						Nine Months Ended						Three Months Ended
	September 30,						September 30,						March 31,
(dollars in thousands, except per share data)	2008			2007			2008			2007			2009			2008
Interest Income
Loans including fees:
Taxable	$	63,455		$	82,561		$	199,862		$	245,055		$	51,694		$	71,128
Nontaxable		5,930			5,502			17,029			16,118			5,850			5,461
Investment securities, available-for-sale:
Taxable		21,252			23,054			65,312			68,591			23,481			22,562
Nontaxable		3,642			3,005			10,298			9,141			5,799			3,221
Investment securities, held-to-maturity, taxable		1,252			1,611			4,005			5, 140			1,098			1,430
Money market investments		148			215			672			6,133
Money market investments and federal funds sold														61			332

Total interest income		95,679			115,948			297,178			350,178			87,983			104,134

Interest Expense
Deposits		22,979			45,064			74,812			145,188			17,790			29,736
Short-term borrowings		2,552			5,447			9,532			13,011			388			3,929
Other borrowings		10,552			10,219			32,104			30,618			10,607			10,679

Total interest expense		36,083			60,730			116,448			188,817			28,785			44,344

Net interest income		59,596			55,218			180,730			161,361			59,198			59,790
Provision for loan losses		6,842			—			34,447			2,445			17,300			21,905

Net interest income after provision for loan losses		52,754			55,218			146,283			158,916			41,898			37,885

Noninterest Income
Wealth management fees		4,163			4,554			13,644			14,267			3,827			4,569
Service charges on deposit accounts		11,835			11,496			33,355			32,965			10,689			10,238
ATM fees		4,508			3,771			13,013			10,487			4,140			4,034
Mortgage banking revenue		1,380			1,208			3,984			3,298			1,728			1,233
Insurance premiums and commissions		8,782			8,889			30,155			29,682			11,410			12,069
Investment product fees		2,335			2,675			7,461			8,285			2,239			2,718
Company-owned life insurance		2,924			2,419			8,435			7, 184			696			2,760
Net securities gains (losses)		45			(472	)		6,625			(3,163	)
Net securities gains														5,577			4,519
Impairment on available-for-sale securities (includes total losses of $15,288 for 2009, net of $12,897 recognized in other comprehensive income, pre-tax)														(2,391	)		—
Gain (loss) on derivatives		(186	)		170			(1,159	)		(22	)		483			(616	)
Gain on sale leaseback transactions		1,601			774			4,765			947			1,589			1,565
Other income		1,608			2,087			9,106			7, 137			2,248			3,787

Total noninterest income		38,995			37,571			129,384			111,067			42,235			46,876

Noninterest Expense
Salaries and employee benefits		40,466			39,638			125,972			122,534			42,699			42,328
Occupancy		9,834			5, 898			29,029			17,787			10,592			9,645
Equipment		2,354			2,683			7,421			8,580			2,314			2,568
Marketing		3,094			1,738			7,789			6,291			1,996			2,044
Data processing		4,768			4,656			14,320			14,537			4,891			4,622
Communication		2,303			2,337			6,825			7, 069			2,551			2,311
Professional fees		1,729			1,740			5,278			5,548			2,642			1,658
Loan expense		1,888			1,541			4,882			4,585			875			1,251
Supplies		782			795			2,416			2,584			1,322			884
Loss (gain) on extinguishment of debt		(148	)		66			(148	)		1,300
Impairment of long-lived assets		—			—			585			1,163
Loss on extinguishment of debt														405			207
FDIC assessment														2,084			302
Amortization of intangibles														1,002			876
Other expense		5, 393			4,403			13,864			14,984			4,091			2,240

Total noninterest expense		72,463			65,495			218,233			206,962			77,464			70,936

Income before income taxes		19,286			27,294			57,434			63,021			6,669			13,825
Income tax expense		2,271			4,730			1,604			10,116
Income tax expense (benefit)														(2,736	)		(5,515	)

Net income	$	17,015		$	22,564		$	55,830		$	52,905			9,405			19,340
Preferred stock dividends and discount accretion														(3,892	)		—

Net income per common share
Basic net income per share	$	0.26		$	0.35		$	0.85		$	0.81
Diluted net income per share		0.26			0.34			0.85			0.80
Net income available to common stockholders													$	5,513		$	19,340

Weighted average number of common shares outstanding
Basic		65,645			65,601			65,636			65,709
Diluted		65,790			65,658			65,738			65,766
Net income per common share — basic													$	0.08		$	0.29
Net income per common share — diluted														0.08			0.29

Weighted average number of common shares outstanding-basic														65,793			65,623
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding-diluted														65,882			65,754

Dividends per common share (1)	$	0.23		$	0.22		$	0.46		$	0.66		$	0.23		$	—

OLD NATIONAL BANCORP

CONSOLIDATED ~~STATEMENT~~STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY (unaudited)


													Accumulated																					Accumulated
													Other			Total																		Other			Total
(dollars and shares	Common Stock						Capital			Retained			Comprehensive			Shareholders’			Comprehensive
in thousands)	Shares			Amount			Surplus			Earnings			Income (Loss)			Equity			Income
Balance, December 31, 2006		66,503		$	66,503		$	565,106		$	35,873		$	(25,113	)	$	642,369
Comprehensive income
Net income		—			—			—			52,905			—			52,905		$	52,905
Other comprehensive income (1)
Change in unrealized gain (loss) on securities available for sale, net of reclassification and tax		—			—			—			—			(65	)		(65	)		(65	)
Reclassification adjustment on cash flows hedges, net of tax		—			—			—			—			299			299			299
Reclassification adjustment on defined benefit pension plans, net of tax		—			—			—			—			1,254			1,254			1,254
																						Preferred			Common			Capital			Retained			Comprehensive			Shareholders’			Comprehensive
Total comprehensive income																			$	54,393

Adjustment to apply FIN No. 48		—			—			—			(3,368	)		—			(3,368	)
Adjustment to apply EITF No. 06-5											(118	)					(118	)
Cash dividends		—			—			—			(43,407	)		—			(43,407	)
Stock repurchased		(228	)		(228	)		(3,850	)		—			—			(4,078	)
Stock based compensation expense		—			—			949			—			—			949
Stock activity under incentive comp plans		(75	)		(75	)		202			—			—			127
Stock options issued in acquisition		—			—			552			—			—			552

Balance, September 30, 2007		66,200		$	66,200		$	562,959		$	41,885		$	(23,625	)	$	647,419


(dollars and shares in thousands)																						Stock			Stock			Surplus			Earnings			Income (Loss)			Equity			Income
Balance, December 31, 2007		66,205		$	66,205		$	563,675		$	34,346		$	(11,345	)	$	652,881						—		$	66,205		$	563,675		$	34,346		$	(11,345	)	$	652,881
Comprehensive income
Net income		—			—			—			55,830			—			55,830		$	55,830			—			—			—			19,340			—			19,340		$	19,340
Other comprehensive income (1)
Change in unrealized gain (loss) on securities available for sale, net of reclassification and tax		—			—			—			—			(40,579	)		(40,579	)		(40,579	)		—			—			—			—			2,438			2,438			2,438
Reclassification adjustment on cash flows hedges, net of tax		—			—			—			—			131			131			131			—			—			—			—			43			43			43
Reclassification adjustment on defined benefit pension plans, net of tax		—			—			—			—			(4,890	)		(4,890	)		(4,890	)
Net loss, settlement cost and amortization of net (gain) loss on defined benefit pension plans, net of tax																							—			—			—			—			95			95			95

Total comprehensive income																			$	10,492																				$	21,916

Cash dividends		—			—						(30,492	)		—			(30,492	)
Other adjustments																							—			—			47			(123	)		—			(76	)
Stock repurchased		(26	)		(26	)		(413	)		—			—			(439	)					—			(13	)		(213	)		—			—			(226	)
Stock based compensation expense		—			—			1,469			—			—			1,469						—			—			874			—			—			874
Stock activity under incentive comp plans		106			106			1,336			—			—			1,442						—			10			14			—			—			24

Balance, September 30, 2008		66,285		$	66,285		$	566,067		$	59,684		$	(56,683	)	$	635,353
Balance, March 31, 2008																							—		$	66,202		$	564,397		$	53,563		$	(8,769	)	$	675,393


Balance, December 31, 2008																						$	97,358		$	66,321		$	569,875		$	50,815		$	(53,504	)	$	730,865
Comprehensive income
Net income																							—			—			—			9,405			—			9,405		$	9,405
Other comprehensive income (1)
Change in unrealized gain (loss) on securities available for sale, net of reclassification and tax																							—			—			—			—			4,913			4,913			4,913
Reclassification adjustment on cash flows hedges, net of tax																							—			—			—			—			709			709			709
Net loss, settlement cost and amortization of net (gain) loss on defined benefit pension plans, net of tax																							—			—			—			—			429			429			429

Total comprehensive income																																								$	15,456

Dividends — common stock																							—			—			—			(15,227	)		—			(15,227	)
Dividends — preferred stock																							—			—			—			(1,250	)		—			(1,250	)
Common stock issued																							—			151			1,357			—			—			1,508
Preferred stock repurchased																							(97,358	)		—			—			(2,642	)		—			(100,000	)
Stock repurchased																							—			(27	)		(320	)		—			—			(347	)
Stock based compensation expense																							—			—			739			—			—			739
Stock activity under incentive comp plans																							—			(34	)		104			(22	)		—			48

Balance, March 31, 2009																						$	—		$	66,411		$	571,755		$	41,079		$	(47,453	)	$	631,792

OLD NATIONAL BANCORP

CONSOLIDATED ~~STATEMENT~~STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (unaudited)


	Nine Months Ended						Three Months Ended
	September 30,						March 31,
(dollars in thousands)	2008			2007			2009			2008
Cash Flows From Operating Activities
Net income	$	55,830		$	52,905		$	9,405		$	19,340

Adjustments to reconcile net income to cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation		4,454			6,276			1,536			1,493
Amortization and impairment of other intangible assets		3,411			2,596			1,002			876
Net discount accretion on investment securities		(1,181	)		(1,881	)		(620	)		(443	)
Restricted stock expense		1,162			728			646			765
Stock option expense		308			221			93			109
Provision for loan losses		34,447			2,445			17,300			21,905
Net securities (gains) losses		(6,625	)		3,163
Net securities gains								(5,577	)		(4,519	)
Impairment on available-for-sale securities								2,391			—
Gain on sale leasebacks		(4,765	)		(947	)		(1,589	)		(1,565	)
Loss on derivatives		1,159			22
(Gain) loss on derivatives								(483	)		616
Net gains on sales and write-downs of loans and other assets		(2,172	)		(1,021	)		(127	)		(780	)
(Gain) loss on extinguishment of debt		(148	)		1,300
Loss on extinguishment of debt								405			207
Increase in cash surrender value of company owned life insurance		(7,894	)		(5,123	)		(690	)		(2,431	)
Residential real estate loans originated for sale		(132,942	)		(195,879	)		(57,880	)		(43,908	)
Proceeds from sale of residential real estate loans		137,094			202,000			56,129			47,523
Decrease in interest receivable		6,563			5,140			814			5,788
Increase in other assets		(27,161	)		(9,058	)
Decrease in accrued expenses and other liabilities		(11,358	)		(19,491	)
(Increase) decrease in other assets								3,398			(31,506	)
Increase (decrease) in accrued expenses and other liabilities								(1,378	)		4,142

Total adjustments		(5,648	)		(9,509	)		15,370			(1,728	)

Net cash flows provided by operating activities		50,182			43,396			24,775			17,612

Cash Flows From Investing Activities
Cash and cash equivalents of subsidiaries acquired, net		—			17,429
Purchase of subsidiaries		—			(78,109	)
Cash and cash equivalents of acquired banking branches, net								353,694			—
Purchases of investment securities available-for-sale		(786,880	)		(644,936	)		(836,865	)		(417,852	)
Proceeds from maturities, prepayments and calls of investment securities available-for-sale		682,189			630,865			184,695			480,824
Proceeds from sales of investment securities available-for-sale		262,058			180,257			78,343			100,177
Proceeds from maturities, prepayments and calls of investment securities held-to-maturity		20,958			27,018			6,540			7,201
Proceeds from redemption of FHLB stock		—			758
Proceeds from sale of loans		2,251			11,712			—			2,251
Net principal collected from (loans made to) customers		(25,200	)		256,056			131,814			(2,780	)
Proceeds from sale of premises and equipment and other assets		7,574			4,286			9			4,104
Proceeds from sale leaseback of real estate		4,542			98,649			—			4,542
Purchase of premises and equipment		(9,349	)		(5,826	)
Purchases of premises and equipment								(4,772	)		(2,519	)

Net cash flows provided by investing activities		158,143			498,159
Net cash flows provided by (used in) investing activities								(86,542	)		175,948

Cash Flows From Financing Activities
Net increase (decrease) in deposits and short-term borrowings:
Noninterest-bearing demand deposits		(9,744	)		(76,669	)		71,060			5,666
Savings, NOW and money market deposits		(152,012	)		(301,237	)		(69,822	)		6,510
Time deposits		(153,519	)		(431,733	)		5,272			(329,642	)
Short-term borrowings		(96,599	)		185,803			177,469			2,256
Payments for maturities on other borrowings		(151,581	)		(6,541	)		(85	)		(50,077	)
Proceeds from issuance of other borrowings		330,000			25,000			—			225,000
Payments related to retirement of debt		—			(189,551	)		(25,464	)		—
Cash dividends paid		(45,407	)		(43,407	)
Cash dividends paid on common stock								(15,227	)		(15,166	)
Cash dividends paid on preferred stock								(1,514	)		—
Common stock repurchased		(439	)		(4,078	)		(347	)		(226	)
Proceeds from exercise of stock options, including tax benefit		1,265			75			—			24
Common stock issued under restricted stock and stock compensation plans		—			52
Repurchase of TARP preferred stock								(100,000	)		—
Common stock issued								1,508			—

Net cash flows used in financing activities		(278,036	)		(842,286	)
Net cash flows provided by (used in) financing activities								42,850			(155,655	)

Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents		(69,711	)		(300,731	)
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents								(18,917	)		37,905
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period		263,672			497,905			193,012			263,672

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	193,961		$	197,174		$	174,095		$	301,577

Supplemental cash flow information:
Total interest paid	$	119,825		$	189,803		$	26,370		$	44,719
Total taxes paid (net of refunds)	$	16,202		$	9,787		$	2		$	5,250

OLD NATIONAL BANCORP

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited)

NOTE 1 — BASIS OF PRESENTATION

The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Old National Bancorp and its wholly-owned affiliates (“Old National”) and have been prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and prevailing practices within the banking industry. Such principles require management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities and the disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. The allowance for loan losses, goodwill and intangibles, derivative financial instruments, income taxes and valuation of securities are particularly subject to change. In the opinion of management, the consolidated financial statements contain all the normal and recurring adjustments necessary for a fair statement of the financial position of Old National as of ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2009 and 2008, ~~and 2007,~~ and December 31, ~~2007,~~2008, and the results of its operations for the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30, 2008~~March 31, 2009 and ~~2007.~~2008. Interim results do not necessarily represent annual results. These financial statements should be read in conjunction with Old National’s Annual Report for the year ended December 31, ~~2007.~~2008.

All significant intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated. Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform with the ~~2008~~2009 presentation. Such reclassifications had no effect on net income.

NOTE 2 — RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

~~SFAS No. 157~~— ~~In September 2006, the FASB issued Statement No. 157 —~~~~Fair Value Measurements~~. The standard defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. The standard establishes a fair value hierarchy about the assumptions used to measure fair value and clarifies assumptions about risk and the effect of a restriction on the sale or use of an asset. SFAS No. 157 became effective for the Company on January 1, 2008. See note 19 to the consolidated financial statements for additional information.

FSP SFAS No. 157-2 —In February 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position No. 157-2. The staff position delays the effective date of SFAS No. 157 for nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities, except for items that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial statements on a recurring basis. The delay is intended to allow additional time to consider the effect of various implementation issues with regard to the application of SFAS No. 157. The new staff position defers the effective date of SFAS No. 157 toexpired January 1, 2009, ~~for items within~~and the ~~scope~~expiration of the ~~staff position.~~

~~SFAS No. 159~~— ~~In February 2007, the FASB issued Statement No. 159 —~~~~The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities.~~The standard provides companies with an option to report selected financial assets and liabilities at fair value and establishes presentation and disclosure requirements designed to facilitate comparisons between companies that choose different measurement attributes for similar types of assets and liabilities. On January 1, 2008, the date this pronouncement became effective for the Company,delay did not have a material impact on Old ~~National elected the fair value option on newly originated residential mortgage loans held for sale and certain retail certificates of deposit on a prospective basis. See note 19 to the~~National’s consolidated financial ~~statements for additional information.~~position or results of operations.

SFAS No. 141(R) —In December 2007, the FASB issued Statement No. 141(R) —Business Combinations. This statement replaces FASB Statement No. 141 —Business Combinations. SFAS No. 141(R) establishes principles and requirements for how an acquiring company (1) recognizes and measures in its financial statements the identifiable assets acquired, the liabilities assumed and any noncontrolling interest in the acquiree, (2) recognizes and measures the goodwill acquired in the business combination or a gain from a bargain purchase, and (3) determines what information to disclose to enable users of the financial statements to evaluate the nature and financial effects of the business combination. The new standard isbecame effective for the Company on January 1, 2009. ~~The Company is currently evaluating~~See Note 3 to the consolidated financial statements for the impact on the Company of adopting SFAS No. 141(R) ~~on the consolidated financial statements.~~.

SFAS No. 160 —In December 2007, the FASB issued Statement No. 160 —Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements — an amendment of ARB No. 51. SFAS No. 160 requires the ownership interests in subsidiaries held by parties other than the parent be clearly identified, labeled and presented in the consolidated balance sheet within equity, but separate from the parent’s equity. It also requires the amount of consolidated net income attributable to the parent and the noncontrolling interest to be clearly identified and presented on the face of the consolidated statement of income. The new standard isbecame effective for the Company on January 1, 2009. The ~~Company is currently evaluating the~~adoption of this statement did not have a material impact ~~of adopting SFAS No. 160~~ on the Company’s consolidated financial ~~statements.~~position or results of operations.

SFAS No. 161— In March 2008, the FASB issued Statement No. 161 —Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities — an amendment of FASB Statement No. 133. SFAS No. 161 requires enhanced disclosures about how and why an entity uses derivative instruments, how derivative instruments and related items are accounted for under Statement 133 and how derivative instruments and related hedged items affect an entity’s financial position, financial performance and cash flows. The new standard isbecame effective for the Company on January 1, 2009. The adoption of this statement did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial position or results of operations and the required disclosures have been included.

FSP FAS 132(R)-1 —In December 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position No. 132(R)-1,Employers’ Disclosures about Postretirement Benefit Plan Assets. This FASB staff position amends FASB Statement No. 132 to provide guidance on an employer’s disclosures about plan assets of a defined benefit pension or other postretirement plan. FSP FAS 132(R)-1 requires disclosure of the fair value of each major category of plan assets for pension plans and other postretirement benefit plans. This FASB staff position becomes effective for the Company on January 1, 2010. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of adopting ~~SFAS No. 161~~FSP FAS 132(R)-1 on the consolidated financial ~~statements.~~

~~SFAS No. 162 —~~~~In May 2008, the FASB issued Statement No. 162 —~~~~The Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles~~~~. The standard identifies the sources of accounting principles and the framework for selecting the principles used in the preparation of financial~~ statements, of nongovernmental entities that are presented in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States. The new standard becomes effective 60 days following the Security and Exchange Commission’s approval of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board amendments to AU Section 411. SFAS No. 162but it is not expected to have a material ~~impact on Old National’s consolidated financial position or results of operations.~~impact.

FSP No. FAS ~~133-1~~107-1 and ~~FIN 45-4~~ APB 28-1—In ~~September 2008,~~April 2009, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position No. FAS ~~133-1~~107-1 and ~~FIN 45-4,~~APB 28-1,Interim Disclosures about ~~Credit Derivatives and Certain Guarantees: An Amendment~~Fair Value of ~~FASB Statement No. 133 and FASB Interpretation No. 45; and Clarification of the Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 161~~Financial Instruments. This FASB staff position amends FASB Statement ~~133~~No. 107 to require ~~sellers~~disclosures about fair values of ~~credit derivatives to disclose information about their credit derivatives and hybrid~~financial instruments ~~that have embedded credit derivatives. This~~for interim reporting periods as well as in annual financial statements. The staff position also amends ~~FASB Interpretation~~APB Opinion No. 4528 to require ~~additional disclosure about the current status of the payment/performance risk of the guarantee. It also clarifies the intent of~~those disclosures in summarized financial information at interim reporting periods. This FASB ~~about the~~staff position becomes effective ~~date of SFAS No. 161. These provisions of~~for interim reporting periods ending after June 15, 2009, with early adoption permitted for periods ending after March 15, 2009. The Company adopted this FASB staff position ~~are effective~~ for the ~~Company for~~interim reporting ~~periods~~period ending ~~after November 15, 2008. FSP FAS 133-1 and FIN 45-4 are not expected to have a material impact on Old National’s consolidated financial position or results of operations.~~March 31, 2009.

FSP No. FAS ~~157-3~~ 115-2 and FAS 124-2—In ~~October 2008,~~April 2009, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position No. FAS ~~157-3,~~115-2 and FAS 124-2,~~Determining the Fair Value~~Recognition and Presentation of ~~a Financial Asset When the Market for That Asset Is Not Active~~Other-Than-Temporary Impairments. This FASB staff position ~~clarifies~~amends the ~~application of SFAS No. 157~~other-than-temporary impairment guidance in U.S. generally accepted accounting principles for debt securities. If an entity determines that it has an other-than-temporary impairment on a ~~market that~~security, it must recognize the credit loss on the security in the income statement. The credit loss is ~~not active and provides an example to illustrate key considerations in determining~~defined as the ~~fair~~difference between the present value of ~~a financial asset when~~ the ~~market~~cash flows expected to be collected and the amortized cost basis. The staff position expands disclosures about other-than-temporary impairment and requires that the annual disclosures in FASB Statement No. 115 and FSP FAS 115-1 and FAS 124-1 be made for ~~that financial asset is not active.~~interim reporting periods. This FASB staff position ~~became~~becomes effective for interim reporting periods ending after June 15, 2009, with early adoption permitted for periods ending after March 15, 2009. The Company adopted this FASB staff position for the interim reporting period ending March 31, 2009. See Note 6 to the consolidated financial statements for the impact on the Company of adopting FSP No. FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2.

FSP No. FAS 157-4— In April 2009, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position No. FAS 157-4,Determining Fair Value When the Volume and Level of Activity for the Asset or Liability Have Significantly Decreased and Identifying Transactions That Are Not Orderly. This FASB staff position provides additional guidance on ~~October 10, 2008~~determining fair value when the volume and level of activity for the asset or liability have significantly decreased when compared with normal market activity for the asset or liability. A significant decrease in the volume or level of activity for the asset of liability is an indication that transactions or quoted prices may not be determinative of fair value because transactions may not be orderly. In that circumstance, further analysis of transactions or quoted prices is needed, and an adjustment to the transactions or quoted prices may be necessary to estimate fair value. This FASB staff position becomes effective for interim reporting periods ending after June 15, 2009, with early adoption permitted for periods ending after March 15, 2009. The Company adopted this FASB staff position for the interim reporting period ending March 31, 2009 and it did not have a material impact on ~~Old National’s~~the Company’s consolidated financial position or results of operations.

SAB ~~109~~111 ——In ~~November 2007,~~April 2009, the Securities and Exchange Commission issued Staff Accounting Bulletin No. ~~109~~111 (“SAB ~~109”~~111”). SAB ~~109 modifies how to apply generally accepted accounting principles to loan commitments that are accounted for at fair value through earnings. Prior to~~111 amends Topic 5.M. in the Staff Accounting Bulletin series entitledOther Than Temporary Impairment of Certain Investments Debt and Equity Securities. On April 9, 2009, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position No. FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2,Recognition and Presentation of Other-Than-Temporary Impairments. SAB ~~109, when companies measured~~111 maintains the ~~fair value of a derivative loan commitment, the expected net future cash flows~~previous views related to ~~the associated servicing of the loan was excluded. Under~~equity securities and amends Topic 5.M. to exclude debt securities from its scope. SAB 109, the expected net future cash flows related to the associated servicing of the loans sold will be included in the measurement of all written loan commitments that are accounted for at fair value through earnings. SAB 109111 was effective for the Company ~~on January 1, 2008.~~as of March 31, 2009. There was no material impact to Old National’s consolidated financial position or results of operations upon adoption.

EITF ~~06-4~~08-6 —In ~~September 2006,~~November 2008, the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force ~~finalized~~reached a consensus on Issue No. ~~06-4,~~08-6,Equity Method Investment Accounting ~~for Deferred Compensation and Postretirement Benefit Aspects of Endorsement Split-Dollar Life Insurance Arrangements.~~Considerations~~This~~ (“EITF ~~Issue addresses~~08-6”). EITF 08-6 clarifies the accounting for ~~separate agreements which split life insurance policy benefits between~~certain transactions and impairment considerations involving equity method investments. An equity investor shall not separately test an ~~employer~~investee’s underlying assets for impairment but will recognize its share of any impairment charge recorded by an investee in earnings and ~~employee. The Issue requires~~consider the ~~employer to recognize~~effect of the impairment on its investment. An equity investor shall account for a ~~liability for future benefits payable to~~share issuance by an investee as if the ~~employee under these agreements. The effects~~investor had sold a proportionate share of ~~applying this issue must be~~its investment, with any gain or loss recognized ~~through either a change~~ in ~~accounting principle through an adjustment to equity or through the retrospective application to all prior periods.~~earnings. EITF ~~06-4~~08-6 became effective for the Company on January 1, ~~2008,~~2009 and did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial position or results of operations.

EITF ~~06-10~~08-7— In ~~March 2007,~~November 2008, the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force reached a consensus on Issue No. ~~06-10,~~08-7,Accounting for ~~Deferred Compensation and Postretirement Benefit Aspects of Collateral Assignment Split-Dollar Life Insurance Arrangements.~~Defensive Intangible Assets~~This Issue provides guidance~~(“EITF 08-7”). EITF 08-7 clarifies how to ~~help companies determine whether a liability~~account for defensive intangible assets subsequent to initial measurement. EITF 08-7 applies to acquired intangible assets in situations in which an entity does not intend to actively use an asset but intends to hold the ~~postretirement benefit associated with a collateral assignment split-dollar life insurance arrangement~~asset to prevent others from obtaining access to the asset. A defensive intangible asset should be ~~recorded in accordance~~accounted for as a separate unit of accounting with ~~either SFAS No. 106 -~~~~Employers’ Accounting for Postretirement Benefits Other Than Pensions~~~~(if, in substance,~~an expected life that reflects the consumption of the expected benefits related to that asset. The benefit from holding a ~~postretirement benefit plan exists) or Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 12 (if~~defensive intangible asset is the ~~arrangement~~direct and indirect cash flows resulting from the entity preventing others from using the asset. EITF 08-7 is in substance, an individual deferred compensation contract). EITF 06-10 also provides guidance on how a company should recognize and measure the asset in a collateral assignment split-dollar life insurance contract. EITF 06-10 became effective for ~~the Company~~intangible assets acquired on or after January 1, ~~2008, and~~2009. The adoption of EITF 08-7 did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial position or results of operations.

FSP EITF ~~06-11~~03-6-1 —In June ~~2007,~~2008, the FASB ~~Emerging Issues Task Force reached a consensus on Issue~~issued FSP No. ~~06-11,~~EITF 03-6-1,~~Accounting for Income Tax Benefits of Dividends on~~Determining Whether Instruments Granted in Share-Based Payment ~~Awards~~Transactions are Participating Securities~~(“EITF 06-11”)~~. ~~EITF 06-11 requires companies to recognize the income tax benefit realized from dividends or dividend equivalents~~This FASB staff position concluded that ~~are charged to retained earnings and paid to employees for non-vested equity-classified employee~~all outstanding unvested share-based payment awards asthat contain rights to nonforfeitable dividends participate in undistributed earnings with common shareholders and therefore are considered participating securities for purposes of computing earnings per share. Entities that have participating securities that are not convertible into common stock are required to use the “two-class” method of computing earnings per share. The two-class method is an ~~increase~~earnings allocation formula that determines earnings per share for each class of common stock and participating security according to ~~additional paid-in capital. The amount recognized~~dividends declared (or accumulated) and participation rights in ~~additional paid-in capital~~undistributed earnings. This FASB staff position is effective for ~~the realized income tax benefit from dividends on~~fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008 and interim periods within those ~~awards should be included in the pool of excess tax benefits available to absorb tax deficiencies on share-based payment awards. EITF 06-11~~fiscal years. This FASB staff position became effective for the Company on January 1, ~~2008, and did not have a~~2009. Upon adoption, all prior-period earnings per share data presented were adjusted retrospectively with no material ~~impact on the Company’s consolidated financial position or results of operations.~~impact.

NOTE 3 — ACQUISITION

On ~~February 1, 2007,~~March 20, 2009, Old National ~~acquired St. Joseph Capital Corporation (''St. Joseph’’),~~completed its acquisition of the Indiana retail branch banking network of Citizens Financial Group, which consists of 65 branches and a ~~banking franchise headquartered~~training facility. The branches are located primarily in ~~Mishawaka,~~the Indianapolis area, with additional locations in the Lafayette, Fort Wayne, Anderson and Bloomington, Indiana ~~for $78.1 million, including acquisition costs.~~markets. Pursuant to the ~~merger~~terms of the purchase agreement, ~~the shareholders~~Old National paid Citizens Financial Group approximately $17.2 million. In accordance with SFAS No.141(R), Old National expensed approximately $3.0 million of ~~St. Joseph received $40.00 in cash for each share~~direct acquisition costs and recorded goodwill of ~~St. Joseph stock in an all-cash transaction. Goodwill~~$8.6 million and $11.2 million of ~~$45.8 million was recorded, of which none is deductible for tax purposes. In addition,~~intangible assets. The intangible assets ~~totaling $14.5 million~~are related to core deposits and ~~customer relationships were recorded and~~ are being amortized on an accelerated basis over ~~10 to 11~~7 years. See Note 9 to the consolidated financial statements for additional information. On the date of acquisition, ~~unaudited financial statements of St. Joseph showed assets of $452.9~~Old National assumed deposit liabilities valued at approximately $427 million ~~which included $336.6 million~~and acquired a portfolio of loans ~~and $78.6 million of securities, $357.3 million of deposits and year-to-date net interest income and other income of $0.8 million and net loss of $3.3~~valued at approximately $5.6 million.

The following table reconciles basic and diluted net income per share for the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30:~~March 31:

(dollars and shares Three Months Ended Three Months Ended
in thousands, September 30, 2008 September 30, 2007
except per share data) Income Shares Amount Income Shares Amount
Basic Net Income Per Share

Income from operations $ 17,015 65,645 $ 0.26 $ 22,564 65,601 $ 0.35

Effect of dilutive securities:

Restricted stock 111 34
Stock options 34 23

Diluted Net Income Per Share

Income from operations and assumed conversions $ 17,015 65,790 $ 0.26 $ 22,564 65,658 $ 0.34


	Three Months Ended		Three Months Ended
(dollars and shares in thousands, except per share data)	March 31, 2009		March 31, 2008
Basic Earnings Per Share
Net income	$	9,405	$	19,340
Less: Preferred stock dividends and accretion of discount		3,892		—

Net income available to common stockholders		5,513		19,340

Weighted average common shares outstanding		65,793		65,623

Basic Earnings Per Share	$	0.08	$	0.29


Diluted Earnings Per Share
Net income available to common stockholders		5,513		19,340

Weighted average common shares outstanding		65,793		65,623
Effect of dilutive securities:
Restricted stock (1)		78		106
Stock options (2)		11		25
Warrants (3)		—		—

Weighted average shares outstanding		65,882		65,754

Diluted Earnings Per Share	$	0.08	$	0.29


(1)		302 shares of restricted stock were not included in the computation of net income per diluted share at March 31, 2009 because the effect would be antidulitive.

(2)		Options to purchase 6,054 shares and 5,727 shares outstanding at March 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively, were not included in the computation of net income per diluted share because the exercise price of these options was greater than the average market price of the common shares and, therefore, the effect would be antidilutive.

(3)		Warrants to purchase 813 shares at March 31, 2009, were not included in the computation because the effect would be antidilutive.

(dollars and shares Nine Months Ended Nine Months Ended
in thousands, September 30, 2008 September 30, 2007
except per share data) Income Shares Amount Income Shares Amount
Basic Net Income Per Share

Income from continuing operations $ 55,830 65,636 $ 0.85 $ 52,905 65,709 $ 0.81

Effect of dilutive securities:

Restricted stock 69 30
Stock options 33 27

Diluted Net Income Per Share

Income from operations and assumed conversions $ 55,830 65,738 $ 0.85 $ 52,905 65,766 $ 0.80

In June 2008, the FASB issued FSP No. EITF 03-6-1,Determining Whether Instruments Granted in Share-Based Payment Transactions are Participating Securities. This FASB staff position is effective for Old National for the interim period beginning January 1, 2009. Upon adoption, all prior-period earnings per share data were recalculated according to EITF 03-6-1. These calculations resulted in no material changes to earnings per share data as previously presented.

NOTE 5 — COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

Comprehensive income consists of net income and other comprehensive income. Other comprehensive income includes unrealized gains and losses on securities available-for-sale and unrealized gains and losses on cash flow hedges and changes in funded status of pension plans which are also recognized as separate components of equity. Following is a summary of other comprehensive income ~~(loss)~~ for the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30, 2008~~March 31, 2009 and ~~2007:~~2008:


	Three Months Ended						Nine Months Ended						Three Months Ended
	September 30,						September 30,						March 31,
(dollars in thousands)	2008			2007			2008			2007			2009			2008
Net income	$	17,015		$	22,564		$	55,830		$	52,905		$	9,405		$	19,340
Other comprehensive income (loss)
Change in securities available for sale:
Unrealized holding gains (losses) arising during the period		(23,060	)		22,079			(60,802	)		(3,072	)		18,911			8,344
Reclassification adjustment for securities (gains) losses realized in income		(45	)		472			(6,625	)		3,163			(795	)		(4,519	)
Other-than-temporary-impairment on available-for-sale debt securities recorded in other comprehensive income														(12,897	)		—
Other-than-temporary-impairment on available-for-sale debt securities associated with credit loss realized in income														2,391			—
Income tax effect		9,218			(8,898	)		26,848			(156	)		(2,697	)		(1,387	)
Cash flow hedges:
Net unrealized derivative gains (losses) on cash flow hedges		—			—			—			—			1,109			—
Reclassification adjustment on cash flow hedges		73			141			216			492			72			71
Income tax effect		(29	)		(55	)		(85	)		(193	)		(472	)		(28	)
Defined benefit pension plans:
Amortization of net (gain) loss recognized in income		(4,076	)		—			(8,151	)		2,091			714			158
Income tax effect		1,630			—			3,261			(837	)		(285	)		(63	)

Total other comprehensive income (loss)		(16,289	)		13,739			(45,338	)		1,488			6,051			2,576

Comprehensive income (loss)	$	726		$	36,303		$	10,492		$	54,393		$	15,456		$	21,916

NOTE 6 — INVESTMENT SECURITIES

The following table summarizes the amortized cost and fair value of the available-for-sale and held-to-maturity investment securities portfolio at ~~September 30, 2008~~March 31, 2009 and December 31, ~~2007~~2008 and the corresponding amounts of unrealized gains and losses therein:


	Amortized		Unrealized		Unrealized			Fair		Amortized		Unrealized		Unrealized			Fair
(dollars in thousands)	Cost		Gains		Losses			Value		Cost		Gains		Losses			Value
September 30, 2008
March 31, 2009
Available-for-sale
U.S. Government-sponsored entities and agencies	$	320,414	$	1,587	$	(2,208	)	$	319,793	$	1,012,591	$	9,702	$	(2,732	)	$	1,019,561
Mortgage-backed securities		1,147,056		4,808		(42,920	)		1,108,944		1,082,763		22,292		(59,913	)		1,045,142
States and political subdivisions		326,110		6,608		(5,348	)		327,370		465,490		21,904		(2,311	)		485,083
Other securities		204,327		102		(36,784	)		167,645		206,468		917		(46,868	)		160,517

Total available-for-sale securities	$	1,997,907	$	13,105	$	(87,260	)	$	1,923,752	$	2,767,312	$	54,815	$	(111,824	)	$	2,710,303

Held-to-maturity
Mortgage-backed securities	$	94,647	$	44	$	(503	)	$	94,188	$	86,079	$	2,789	$	(444	)	$	88,424
Other securities		10,669		—		(216	)		10,453		6,910		—		—			6,910

Total held-to-maturity securities	$	105,316	$	44	$	(719	)	$	104,641	$	92,989	$	2,789	$	(444	)	$	95,334

December 31, 2007
December 31, 2008
Available-for-sale
U.S. Government-sponsored entities and agencies	$	678,545	$	10,757	$	(355	)	$	688,947	$	381,634	$	7,644	$	—		$	389,278
Mortgage-backed securities		963,039		1,838		(23,910	)		940,967		1,127,064		15,443		(60,888	)		1,081,619
States and political subdivisions		286,898		8,404		(418	)		294,884		471,246		16,030		(5,072	)		482,204
Other securities		218,888		1,007		(4,052	)		215,843		209,701		883		(38,659	)		171,925

Total available-for-sale securities	$	2,147,370	$	22,006	$	(28,735	)	$	2,140,641	$	2,189,645	$	40,000	$	(104,619	)	$	2,125,026

Held-to-maturity
Mortgage-backed securities	$	107,830	$	—	$	(2,237	)	$	105,593	$	90,987	$	1,529	$	—		$	92,516
Other securities		18,939		—		(28	)		18,911		8,674		—		(359	)		8,315

Total held-to-maturity securities	$	126,769	$	—	$	(2,265	)	$	124,504	$	99,661	$	1,529	$	(359	)	$	100,831

The following table summarizes the investment securities with unrealized losses at March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008 by aggregated major security type and length of time in a continuous unrealized loss position:


	Less than 12 months					12 months or longer					Total
	Fair		Unrealized			Fair		Unrealized			Fair		Unrealized
(dollars in thousands)	Value		Losses			Value		Losses			Value		Losses
March 31, 2009
Available-for-Sale
U.S. Government-sponsored entities and agencies	$	361,753	$	(2,732	)	$	—	$	—		$	361,753	$	(2,732	)
Mortgage-backed securities		159,209		(42,734	)		35,011		(17,179	)		194,220		(59,913	)
States and political subdivisions		72,959		(2,251	)		1,183		(60	)		74,142		(2,311	)
Other securities		58,471		(9,274	)		31,907		(37,594	)		90,378		(46,868	)

Total available-for-sale	$	652,392	$	(56,991	)	$	68,101	$	(54,833	)	$	720,493	$	(111,824	)


Held-to-Maturity
Other securities	$	—	$	—		$	6,465	$	(444	)	$	6,465	$	(444	)

Total held-to-maturity	$	—	$	—		$	6,465	$	(444	)	$	6,465	$	(444	)


December 31, 2008
Available-for-Sale
U.S. Government-sponsored entities and agencies	$	—	$	—		$	—	$	—		$	—	$	—
Mortgage-backed securities		235,124		(46,394	)		64,164		(14,494	)		299,288		(60,888	)
States and political subdivisions		121,276		(5,072	)		—		—			121,276		(5,072	)
Other securities		81,326		(7,793	)		29,785		(30,866	)		111,111		(38,659	)

Total available-for-sale	$	437,726	$	(59,259	)	$	93,949	$	(45,360	)	$	531,675	$	(104,619	)


Held-to-Maturity
Other securities	$	—	$	—		$	8,315	$	(359	)	$	8,315	$	(359	)

Total held-to-maturity	$	—	$	—		$	8,315	$	(359	)	$	8,315	$	(359	)

Proceeds from ~~the~~ sales and calls of ~~investment~~ securities ~~available-for-sale during the first nine months of 2008~~available for sale were ~~$262.1~~$78.3 million and ~~$384.7~~$100.2 million ~~respectively. For~~for the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2009 and 2008, ~~realized~~respectively. Gross gains ~~were $8.6~~of $6.5 million and losses were $2.0 million. Included in the realized net gains were $4.5 million of gains related to securities that were called by the issuers. For the nine months ended September 30, 2007, proceeds from the sales of investment securities available-for-sale were $180.3$4.6 million and ~~realized gains were~~gross losses of $0.9 million and ~~losses~~$0.1 million were ~~$4.1 million.~~realized on these sales during 2009 and 2008, respectively. Also impacting earnings in 2009 is an other-than-temporary impairment charge related to credit loss on three trust preferred securities in the amount of $2.4 million, described below.

Management evaluates securities for other-than-temporary impairment (“OTTI”) at least on a quarterly basis, and more frequently when economic or market conditions warrant such an evaluation. The investment securities portfolio is evaluated for OTTI by segregating the portfolio into two general segments and applying the appropriate OTTI model. Investment securities classified as available for sale or held-to-maturity are generally evaluated for OTTI under Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 115,Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities. However, certain purchased beneficial interests, including non-agency mortgage-backed securities, asset-backed securities, and collateralized debt obligations, that had credit ratings at the time of purchase of below AA are evaluated using the model outlined in EITF Issue No. 99-20,Recognition of Interest Income and Impairment on Purchased Beneficial Interests and Beneficial Interests that Continue to be Held by a Transfer in Securitized Financial Assets.

In determining OTTI under the SFAS No. 115 model, management considers many factors, including: (1) the length of time and the extent to which the fair value has been less than cost, (2) the financial condition and near-term prospects of the issuer, (3) whether the market decline was affected by macroeconomic conditions, and (4) whether the entity has the intent to sell the debt security or more likely than not will be required to sell the debt security before its anticipated recovery. The assessment of whether an other-than-temporary decline exists involves a high degree of subjectivity and judgment and is based on the information available to management at a point in time.

The second segment of the portfolio uses the OTTI guidance provided by EITF 99-20 that is specific to purchased beneficial interests that, on the purchase date, were rated below AA. Under the EITF 99-20 model, the Company compares the present value of the remaining cash flows as estimated at the preceding evaluation date to the current expected remaining cash flows. An OTTI is deemed to have occurred if there has been an adverse change in the remaining expected future cash flows.

When other-than-temporary-impairment occurs under either model, the amount of the other-than-temporary-impairment recognized in earnings depends on whether an entity intends to sell the security or more likely than not will be required to sell the security before recovery of its amortized cost basis less any current-period credit loss. If an entity intends to sell or more likely than not will be required to sell the security before recovery of its amortized cost basis less any current-period credit loss, the other-than-temporary-impairment shall be recognized in earnings equal to the entire difference between the investment’s amortized cost basis and its fair value at the balance sheet date. If an entity does not intend to sell the security and it is not more likely than not that the entity will be required to sell the security before recovery of its amortized cost basis less any current-period loss, the other-than-temporary-impairment shall be separated into the amount representing the credit loss and the amount related to all other factors. The amount of the total other-than-temporary-impairment related to the credit loss is determined based on the present value of cash flows expected to be collected and is recognized in earnings. The amount of the total other-than-temporary-impairment related to other factors shall be recognized in other comprehensive income, net of applicable taxes. The previous amortized cost basis less the other-than-temporary-impairment recognized in earnings shall become the new amortized cost basis of the investment.

As of ~~September 30, 2008,~~March 31, 2009, Old National’s security portfolio consisted of ~~1,047~~1,170 securities, ~~363~~206 of which were in an unrealized loss position. ~~Old National does not believe any individual unrealized loss represents other-than-temporary impairment.~~ The majority of unrealized losses are ~~primarily attributable~~related to ~~changes in interest rates~~the Company’s mortgage-backed and ~~continued financial market stress. Factors considered in evaluating the~~other securities, ~~included whether the securities were backed by U.S. Government-sponsored entities and agencies and credit quality concerns surrounding the recovery of the full principal balance.~~as discussed below:

Mortgage-backed Securities

At ~~September 30, 2008,~~March 31, 2009, approximately ~~79%~~80% of the mortgage-backed securities held by Old National were issued by U.S. government-sponsored entities and agencies, primarily Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, institutions which the government has affirmed its commitment to support. Because the decline in market value is attributable to changes in interest rates and illiquidity, and not credit quality, and because the Company ~~has~~does not have the intent ~~and ability~~ to ~~hold~~sell these mortgage-backed securities ~~until a~~and it is likely that it will not be required to sell the securities before their anticipated recovery, ~~of fair value, which may be maturity,~~ the Company does not consider these securities to be other-than-temporarily impaired at ~~September 30, 2008.~~March 31, 2009.

The Company’s mortgage-backed securities portfolio did contain non-agency collateralized mortgage obligations with a market value of $209.2 million which had unrealized losses of approximately $59.3 million at March 31, 2009. These non-agency mortgage-backed securities were rated AAA at purchase and are not within the scope of EITF 99-20. The Company monitors to insure it has adequate credit support and as of March 31, 2009, the Company believes there is no other-than-temporary-impairment and does not have the intent to sell these securities and it is likely that it will not be required to sell the securities before their anticipated recovery.

Other Securities

The Company’s unrealized losses on other securities relate primarily to its investment in pooled trust preferred securities. The decline in value is primarily attributable to temporary illiquidity and the financial crisis affecting these markets and not necessarily the expected cash flows of the individual securities. Due to the illiquidity in the market, it is unlikely that the Company would be able to recover its investment in these securities if the Company sold the securities at this time. ~~Because the Company has analyzed the cash flow characteristics~~

Our analysis of ~~the securities and has the intent and ability to hold~~seven of these ~~securities until a recovery of fair value, which may be at maturity; and, for~~ investments falls within the scope of EITF 99-20 determined that there was no adverse change in the cash flow as viewed by a market participant, it does not consider the investment in these securitized assets to be other-than-temporarily impaired at September 30, 2008.

~~The investments within the scope EITF 99-20 include $12.3~~and includes $34.7 million book value of pooled trust preferred ~~securities made up of seven different issues.~~securities. These securities were rated A2 and A3 at inception, but ~~during the quarter~~at March, 31, 2009 Moody’s rated one security Baa2, two ~~were downgraded to Ba1~~securities Caa3 and ~~one was downgraded to Baa2.~~four securities Ca. The issuers in these securities are primarily banks, but some of the pools do include a limited number of insurance companies. The Company uses anthe OTTI evaluation model to compare the present value of ~~current~~expected cash flows to the previous estimate to ensure there are no adverse changes in cash flows during the quarter. The OTTI model considers the structure and term of the CDO and the financial condition of the underlying issuers. Specifically, the model details interest rates, principal balances of note classes and underlying issuers, the timing and amount of interest and principal payments of the underlying issuers, and the allocation of the payments to the note classes. The current estimate of expected cash flows is based on the most recent trustee reports and any other relevant market information including announcements of interest payment deferrals or defaults of underlying trust preferred securities. Assumptions used in the model include expected future default rates and prepayments. We assume no recoveries on defaults and treat all interest payment deferrals as defaults. In addition we use the model to “stress” each CDO, or make assumptions more severe than expected activity, to determine the degree to which assumptions could deteriorate before the CDO could no longer fully support repayment of Old National’s note class. ~~At September 30, 2008,~~Upon completion of the March 31, 2009 analysis, our model indicated ~~no adverse change in cash flows despite the fact that the fair values~~other-than-temporary impairment on three of these securities, ~~declined substantially from June 30, 2008 resulting~~all of which experienced additional defaults or deferrals during the period. These three securities had other-than-temporary-impairment losses of $15.3 million, of which $2.4 million was recorded as expense and $12.9 million was recorded in another comprehensive income. These three securities remained classified as available for sale at March 31, 2009, and together, the seven securities subject to EITF 99-20 accounted for $27.2 million of the unrealized loss ~~of $22.5 million~~in the other securities category at March 31, 2009.

The following table details the ~~end of~~three debt securities with other-than-temporary-impairment, their credit rating at March 31, 2009 and the ~~quarter.~~related credit losses recognized in earnings:

~~At September 30, 2008, Old National did not have any securities in its portfolio issued by Lehman Brothers or any preferred or common equity securities issued by Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac.~~


			MM Community		Reg Div Funding
	Tropic 2003 A4L		Funding IX B-2		2004 B-2
	Rated Caa3		Rated Caa3		Rated Ca		Total
Amount of other-than-temporary-impairment related to credit loss at January 1, 2009	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—
Addition		828		282		1,281		2,391

Amount of other-than-temporary-impairment related to credit loss at March 31, 2009	$	828	$	282	$	1,281	$	2,391

NOTE 7 — LOANS HELD FOR SALE

Effective January 1, 2008, residential loans that Old National has committed to sell are recorded at fair value in accordance with SFAS No. 159 —The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities. Prior to this, these residential loans had been recorded at the lower of cost or market value. At ~~September 30, 2008~~March 31, 2009 and December 31, ~~2007,~~2008, Old National had residential loans held for sale of ~~$11.1~~$19.6 million and ~~$13.0~~$17.2 million, respectively.

During the first ~~nine months~~quarter of 2008, ~~$2.2 million of~~ commercial loans held for investment of $2.2 million were reclassified to loans held for sale at the lower of cost or ~~market~~fair value and sold, with no write-down on the loans transferred. ~~During the first nine months of 2007, commercial real estate loans held for investment of $10.2 million and commercial loans of $4.0 million~~At March 31, 2009, there were ~~transferred to~~no loans held for sale ~~and sold, resulting in a $2.5 million reduction to the allowance for loan losses.~~under this arrangement.

NOTE 11 — FINANCING ACTIVITIES

The following table summarizes Old National’s and its subsidiaries’ other borrowings at ~~September 30, 2008,~~March 31, 2009, and December 31, ~~2007:~~2008:


	September 30,			December 31,			March 31,			December 31,
(dollars in thousands)	2008			2007			2009			2008
Old National Bancorp:
Medium-term notes, Series 1997 (fixed rate 3.50%) matured June 2008	$	—		$	100,000
Senior unsecured note (fixed rate 5.00%) maturing May 2010		50,000			50,000		$	50,000		$	50,000
Junior subordinated debenture (fixed rates 6.27% to 8.00% and variable rate 6.81%) maturing April 2032 to March 2035		108,000			108,000
Junior subordinated debenture (fixed rates 6.27% to 8.00% and variable rate 4.27%) maturing April 2032 to March 2035								108,000			108,000
SFAS 133 fair value hedge and other basis adjustments		(782	)		(1,872	)		(759	)		(771	)
Old National Bank:
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase (fixed rates 2.45% to 4.06%) maturing December 2010 to October 2012		99,000			74,000			99,000			99,000
Federal Home Loan Bank advances (fixed rates 2.11% to 8.34%) maturing September 2009 to January 2023		427,815			124,369			400,123			425,198
Senior unsecured bank notes (fixed rate 3.95%) maturing February 2008		—			50,000
Subordinated bank notes (fixed rate 6.75%) maturing October 2011		150,000			150,000			150,000			150,000
Capital lease obligation		4,400			4,427			4,380			4,390
SFAS 133 fair value hedge and other basis adjustments		(1,118	)		(2,202	)		(786	)		(950	)

Total other borrowings	$	837,315		$	656,722		$	809,958		$	834,867

JUNIOR SUBORDINATED DEBENTURES

Junior subordinated debentures related to trust preferred securities are classified in “other borrowings”. These securities qualify as Tier 1 capital for regulatory purposes, subject to certain limitations.

Old National guarantees the payment of distributions on the trust preferred securities issued by ONB Capital Trust II. ONB Capital Trust II issued $100 million in preferred securities in April 2002. The preferred securities have a liquidation amount of $25 per share with a cumulative annual distribution rate of 8.0% or $2.00 per share payable quarterly and maturing on April 15, 2032. Proceeds from the issuance of these securities were used to purchase junior subordinated debentures with the same financial terms as the securities issued by ONB Capital Trust II. Old National may redeem the junior subordinated debentures and thereby cause a redemption of the trust preferred securities in whole (or in part from time to time) on or after April 12, 2007. Costs associated with the issuance of these trust preferred securities totaling $3.3 million in 2002 were capitalized and are being amortized through the maturity dates of the securities. The unamortized balance is included in other assets in the consolidated balance sheet.

During February 2007, Old National acquired St. Joseph Capital Trust I and St. Joseph Capital Trust II in conjunction with its acquisition of St. Joseph Capital Corporation. Old National guarantees the payment of distributions on the trust preferred securities issued by St. Joseph Capital Trust I and St. Joseph Capital Trust II. St. Joseph Capital Trust I issued $3.0 million in preferred securities in July 2003. The preferred securities carry a variable rate of interest priced at the three-month LIBOR plus 305 basis points, payable quarterly and maturing on July 11, 2033. Proceeds from the issuance of these securities were used to purchase junior subordinated debentures with the same financial terms as the securities issued by St. Joseph Capital Trust I. St. Joseph Capital Trust II issued $5.0 million in preferred securities in March 2005. The preferred securities have a cumulative annual distribution rate of 6.27% until March 2010 when it will carry a variable rate of interest priced at the three-month LIBOR plus 175 basis points, payable quarterly and maturing on March 17, 2035. Proceeds from the issuance of these securities were used to purchase junior subordinated debentures with the same financial terms as the securities issued by St. Joseph Capital Trust II. Old National may redeem the junior subordinated debentures and thereby cause a redemption of the trust preferred securities in whole (or in part from time to time) on or after September 30, 2008 (for debentures owned by St. Joseph Capital Trust I) and on or after March 31, 2010 (for debentures owned by St. Joseph Capital Trust II), and in whole (but not in part) following the occurrence and continuance of certain adverse federal income tax or capital treatment events.

CAPITAL LEASE OBLIGATION

On January 1, 2004, Old National entered into a long-term capital lease obligation for a financial center in Owensboro, Kentucky, which extends for 25 years with one renewal option for 10 years. The economic substance of this lease is that Old National is financing the acquisition of the building through the lease and accordingly, the building is recorded as an asset and the lease is recorded as a liability. The fair value of the capital lease obligation was estimated using a discounted cash flow analysis based on Old National’s current incremental borrowing rate for similar types of borrowing arrangements.

At ~~September 30, 2008,~~March 31, 2009, the future minimum lease payments under the capital lease were as follows:


(dollars in thousands)
2008 remaining	$	93
2009		390
2009 remaining			$	292
2010		390		390
2011		390		390
2012		390		390
2013				390
Thereafter		11,704		11,314

Total minimum lease payments		13,357		13,166
Less amounts representing interest		8,957		8,786

Present value of net minimum lease payments	$	4,400	$	4,380

LINE OF CREDIT

During the first quarter of 2008, Old National entered into a $100 million revolving credit facility at the parent company level. Three unrelated financial institutions serve as lenders for the facility. ~~At September 30,~~During part of 2008, ~~Old National had drawn~~ $55 million onwas outstanding under the revolving credit facility ~~which is~~and was included in other short-term borrowings. The facility ~~has~~had an interest rate of LIBOR plus 1.00% and a maturity of 364 days. ~~The revolving~~There was no amount outstanding as of December 31, 2008. On February 13, 2009, the line of credit was ~~amended on September 5, 2008~~terminated.

Subsequent to ~~adjust debt covenant requirements, resulting in a waiver fee of $55 thousand.~~March 31, 2009, Old National entered into a $30 million revolving credit facility at the parent level. The facility had an interest rate of LIBOR plus 2.00% and a maturity of 364 days. There was ~~in compliance~~no amount outstanding as of March 31, 2009.

TERM AUCTION FACILITY

On January 2, 2009, Old National borrowed $100 million from the Federal Reserve under its Term Auction Facility. The borrowing has an interest rate of .20% and a maturity of 83 days. On January 15, 2009, Old National borrowed an additional $50 million from the Federal Reserve under the Term Auction Facility. The additional borrowing had an interest rate of .25% and a maturity of 28 days. On February 12, 2009, the $50 million borrowing was rolled over into new debt with ~~its~~an interest rate of .25% and a maturity date of March 12, 2009. On March 12, 2009, the $50 million borrowing was rolled over into new debt ~~covenant requirements at September 30, 2008.~~with an interest rate of .25% and a maturity date of April 9, 2009. On April 9, 2009, the $50 million debt matured and was replaced with $100 million of new debt with an interest rate of .25% and a maturity date of May 7, 2009. On April 23, 2009, Old National borrowed an additional $50 million with an interest rate of .25% and a maturity date of July 16, 2009.

NOTE 12 — EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS

RETIREMENT PLAN

Old National maintains a funded noncontributory defined benefit plan (the “Retirement Plan”) that was frozen as of December 31, 2005. Retirement benefits are based on years of service and compensation during the highest paid five years of employment. The freezing of the plan provides that future salary increases will not be considered. Old National’s policy is to contribute at least the minimum funding requirement determined by the plan’s actuary.

Old National also maintains an unfunded pension restoration plan (the “Restoration Plan”) which provides benefits for eligible employees that are in excess of the limits under Section 415 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, that apply to the Retirement Plan. The Restoration Plan is designed to comply with the requirements of ERISA. The entire cost of the plan, which was also frozen as of December 31, 2005, is supported by contributions from the Company.

Old National contributed ~~$0.7~~$0.2 million to cover benefit payments from the Restoration Plan during the first ~~nine~~three months of ~~2008.~~2009. Old National expects to contribute an additional ~~$0.1~~$0.2 million to cover benefit payments from the Restoration Plan during the remainder of ~~2008.~~2009.

The net periodic benefit cost and its components were as follows for the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30:~~March 31:


	Three Months Ended						Nine Months Ended						Three Months Ended
	September 30,						September 30,						March 31,
(dollars in thousands)	2008			2007			2008			2007			2009			2008
Interest cost	$	536		$	586		$	1,607		$	1,757		$	493		$	536
Expected return on plan assets		(792	)		(833	)		(2,376	)		(2,498	)		(483	)		(792	)
Recognized actuarial loss		158			193			474			579			363			158
Settlement		375			451			809			1,050			350			—

Net periodic benefit cost	$	277		$	397		$	514		$	888		$	723		$	(98	)

Restricted Stock Awards

The Company granted 136 thousand shares of performance based restricted stock awards to certain key officers during 2008, with shares vesting at the end of a thirty-six month period based on the achievement of certain targets. In addition, the Company granted 4672 thousand time-based restricted stock awards to certain key officers during ~~2008,~~2009, with shares vesting at the end of a thirty-six month period. Compensation expense is recognized on a straight-line basis over the vesting period. Shares are subject to certain restrictions and risk of forfeiture by the participants. As of ~~September 30, 2008,~~March 31, 2009, unrecognized compensation expense was estimated to be ~~$4.7~~$4.3 million for unvested restricted share awards.

Old National recorded expense of ~~$0.8~~$0.4 million, net of tax benefit, during the first ~~nine~~three months of ~~2008,~~2009, compared to expense of $0.5 million during the first ~~nine~~three months of ~~2007~~2008 related to the vesting of restricted share awards. Included in the first ~~nine~~three months of ~~2008 and 2007~~2009 is the reversal of ~~$1.2 million and $1.4~~$0.1 million of expense ~~respectively,~~ associated with certain performance-based restricted stock grants.

Restricted Stock Units

The Company granted 103 thousand shares of performance based restricted stock units to certain key officers during 2009, with shares vesting at the end of a thirty-six month period based on the achievement of certain targets. Compensation expense is recognized on a straight-line basis over the vesting period. Shares are subject to certain restrictions and risk of forfeiture by the participants. In addition, certain of the restricted stock units are subject to relative performance factors which could increase or decrease the percentage of shares issued.

Old National recorded $0.1 million of stock based compensation expense, net of tax, during the first three months of 2009. The Company did not grant restricted stock units in 2008.

NOTE 14 — INCOME TAXES

Following is a summary of the major items comprising the differences in taxes from continuing operations computed at the federal statutory rate and as recorded in the consolidated statement of income for the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30:~~March 31:


	Three Months Ended						Nine Months Ended						Three Months Ended
	September 30,						September 30,						March 31,
(dollars in thousands)	2008			2007			2008			2007			2009			2008
Provision at statutory rate of 35%	$	6,750		$	9,553		$	20,102		$	22,057		$	2,334		$	4,839
Tax-exempt income		(4,156	)		(3,564	)		(11,850	)		(10,604	)		(4,171	)		(3,773	)
Reversal of portion of unrecognized tax benefits		—			(1,847	)		(6,611	)		(1,847	)		—			(6,611	)
State income taxes		(353	)		—			5			—			(806	)		4
Other, net		30			588			(42	)		510			(93	)		26

Income tax expense (benefit)	$	2,271		$	4,730		$	1,604		$	10,116		$	(2,736	)	$	(5,515	)

Effective tax rate		11.8	%		17.3	%		2.8	%		16.1	%		(41.0)	%		(39.9	)%

For the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30, 2008,~~March 31, 2009, the effective tax rate was lower than the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30, 2007.~~March 31, 2008. The ~~lower~~main factor for the decrease in the effective tax rate for the three months ended ~~September 30, 2008, resulted from~~March 31, 2009, was that the tax-exempt income comprised a higher percentage of ~~tax-exempt~~pre-tax income ~~to income before income taxes compared to~~in the three months ended ~~September 30, 2007. The lower effective tax rate for the nine months ended September 30, 2008, was primarily a result of a decrease in the unrecognized tax benefit liability, as discussed below.~~March 31, 2009 than at March 31, 2008.

Unrecognized Tax Benefits

The Company and its subsidiaries file a consolidated U.S. federal income tax return, as well as filing various state returns. ~~In the first quarter of 2008, the Company reversed $6.6 million related to uncertain tax positions accounted for under FASB Interpretation No. 48,~~~~Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes.~~~~The positive $6.6 million~~Unrecognized state income tax ~~reversal primarily relates to a U.S. Tax Court decision confirming that a subsidiary~~benefits are reported net of ~~a bank can deduct the interest expense of~~their related deferred federal income tax exempt obligations it has purchased. The time for the Internal Revenue Service to appeal the court ruling expired in the first quarter. The Company also has been informed by the Internal Revenue Service that they will not audit tax year 2005 as they previously indicated. As a result of these items, the Company reversed a total of $6.6 million from its unrecognized tax benefit liability which includes $0.5 million of interest.benefit.

During the three months ended September 30, 2007, the Company reversed $1.8 million related to uncertain tax positions due to the conclusion of a tax audit effectively settling the year 2002 as well as several items from 2003 and 2004.

As part of the Company’s overall interest rate risk management, Old National uses derivative instruments, including interest rate swaps, caps and floors. The notional amount of these derivative instruments was $111.1 million and $55.1 million ~~and $216.7 million~~ at ~~September 30, 2008~~March 31, 2009 and December 31, ~~2007,~~2008, respectively. In addition, commitments to fund certain mortgage loans (interest rate lock commitments) and forward commitments for the future delivery of mortgage loans to third party investors are considered derivatives. At ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2009, the notional amount of the interest rate lock commitments and forward commitments were $46.9 million and $64.8 million, respectively. At December 31, 2008, the notional amount of the interest rate lock commitments and forward commitments were ~~$12.7~~$20.6 million and ~~$23.2 million, respectively. At December 31, 2007, the notional amount of the interest rate lock commitments and forward commitments were $6.9 million and $19.6~~$37.0 million, respectively. It is the Company’s practice to enter into forward commitments for the future delivery of residential mortgage loans to third party investors when interest rate lock commitments are entered into in order to economically hedge the effect of changes in interest rates resulting from its commitment to fund the loans. All derivative instruments are recognized on the balance sheet at their fair value in accordance with SFAS No. 133,Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, as amended. ~~Any ineffectiveness associated with these instruments is immaterial and reported in other income in the Consolidated Statement of Income.~~

The effect of derivative instruments on the Consolidated Statement of Income for the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2009 and 2008 are as follows:


		Three months			Nine months				Three months			Three months
		ended			ended				ended			ended
(dollars in thousands)		September 30, 2008			September 30, 2008				March 31, 2009			March 31, 2008
Derivatives in Statement 133	Location of Gain or (Loss)	Amount of Gain or (Loss)						Location of Gain or (Loss)	Amount of Gain or (Loss)
Fair Value Hedging	Recognized in Income on	Recognized in Income on						Recognized in Income on	Recognized in Income on
Relationships	Derivative	Derivative						Derivative	Derivative
Interest rate contracts (1)	Interest income / (expense)	$	34		$	710		Interest income / (expense)	$	660		$	263
Interest rate contracts (2)	Other income / (expense)		128			199		Other income / (expense)		12			97

Total		$	162		$	909			$	672		$	360


Derivatives Not Designated as	Location of Gain or (Loss)	Amount of Gain or (Loss)						Location of Gain or (Loss)	Amount of Gain or (Loss)
Hedging Instruments under	Recognized in Income on	Recognized in Income on						Recognized in Income on	Recognized in Income on
Statement 133	Derivative	Derivative						Derivative	Derivative
Interest rate contracts (1)	Interest income / (expense)	$	95		$	218		Interest income / (expense)	$	(360	)	$	—
Interest rate contracts (3)	Other income / (expense)		(314	)		(1,358	)	Other income / (expense)		472			(713	)
Mortgage contracts	Mortgage banking revenue		287			172		Mortgage banking revenue		328			(134	)

Total		$	68		$	(968	)		$	440		$	(847	)

In November 2002, several beneficiaries of certain trusts filed a complaint against Old National Bancorp and ~~its affiliates. Management does~~Old National Trust Company in the United States District Court for the Western District of Kentucky relating to the administration of the trusts in 1997. The complaint, as amended, alleged that Old National (through a predecessor), as trustee, mismanaged termination of a lease between the trusts and a tenant mining company. The complaint seeks, among other relief, unspecified damages, (costs and expenses, including attorneys’ fees, and such other relief as the court might find just and proper.) In March of 2009, the Court granted summary judgment to Old National concluding that the plaintiffs do not ~~believe~~have standing to sue Old National in this matter. The plaintiffs subsequently filed a motion to alter or amend the judgment with the Court which is currently pending. Old National has objected to the plaintiffs motion to alter or amend the judgment granted in favor of Old National and will also contest any appeal the plaintiffs may file. There can be no assurance, however, that Old National will be successful, and an adverse resolution of ~~these claims will~~the lawsuit could have a material ~~impact~~adverse effect on ~~Old National’s~~its consolidated financial position and results of ~~operations.~~operations in the period in which the lawsuit is resolved. Old National is not presently able to reasonably estimate potential losses, if any, related to the lawsuit and has not recorded a liability in its accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets.

LEASES

Old National rents certain premises and equipment under operating leases, which expire at various dates. Many of these leases require the payment of property taxes, insurance premiums, maintenance and other costs. In some cases, rentals are subject to increase in relation to a cost-of-living index.

In December 2006, Old National entered into a sale leaseback agreement with an unrelated third party for its three main buildings in downtown Evansville, Indiana. Old National sold assets with a carrying value of $69.9 million, received approximately $79.0 million in cash and incurred $0.4 million of selling costs. The $8.7 million deferred gain will be amortized over the term of the lease. The agreement requires rent payments of approximately $6.6 million per year over the next 23 years.

During 2007, seventy-three financial centers were sold in a series of sale leaseback transactions to an unrelated party. Old National received cash proceeds of $176.3 million, net of selling costs. The properties sold had a carrying value of $65.3 million, resulting in a gain of $111.1 million. In 2007, $4.7 million of this gain was recognized, the remainder has been deferred and is being amortized over the term of the leases. The leases have terms of ten to twenty-four years, and Old National has the right, at its option, to extend the term of the leases for four additional successive terms of five years each, upon specified terms and conditions. Under the agreements signed in 2007, Old National is obligated to pay base rents for the properties in an aggregate annual amount of $14.0 million in the first year.

In addition, Old National sold an office building located in Evansville, Indiana to an unrelated party in a separate transaction during 2007. This transaction resulted in cash proceeds of $3.4 million, net of selling costs. The property had a carrying value of $3.7 million, resulting in a loss of $0.3 million. Old National agreed to lease back the building for a term of five years. Under the lease agreement, Old National is obligated to pay a base rent of $0.4 million per year.

During ~~the first nine months of~~ 2008, Old National sold ~~six~~eight financial centers in a series of sale leaseback transactions to unrelated parties. Old National received cash proceeds of ~~$9.7~~$15.9 million, net of selling costs. The properties sold had a carrying value of ~~$7.2~~$12.0 million. The ~~$2.5~~$3.9 million deferred gain will be amortized over the term of the leases. The leases have terms of fifteen to twenty years. Under the lease agreements, Old National is obligated to pay a base rent of ~~$0.9~~$1.5 million per year.

CREDIT-RELATED FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

In the normal course of business, Old National’s banking affiliates have entered into various agreements to extend credit, including loan commitments of ~~$1.118~~$1.137 billion and standby letters of credit of ~~$111.0~~$109.7 million at ~~September 30, 2008.~~March 31, 2009. At ~~September 30, 2008,~~March 31, 2009, approximately ~~$1.056~~$1.073 billion of the loan commitments had fixed rates and ~~$62~~$64 million had floating rates, with the fixed interest rates ranging from 1% to 21%. At December 31, ~~2007,~~2008, loan commitments were ~~$1.195~~$1.124 billion and standby letters of credit were ~~$114.1~~$108.4 million. These commitments are not reflected in the consolidated financial statements. At ~~both September 30, 2008~~March 31, 2009 and December 31, ~~2007,~~2008, the balance of the allowance for unfunded loan commitments was $3.7 million and $3.5 million, respectively.

At ~~September 30, 2008~~March 31, 2009 and December 31, ~~2007,~~2008 Old National had credit extensions of ~~$30.9~~$28.8 million and ~~$55.6~~$29.0 million, respectively, with various unaffiliated banks related to letter of credit commitments issued on behalf of Old National’s clients. At ~~September 30, 2008~~March 31, 2009 and December 31, ~~2007,~~2008, Old National provided collateral to the unaffiliated banks to secure credit extensions totaling ~~$26.8~~$25.0 million and ~~$41.8~~$25.0 million, respectively. Old National did not provide collateral for the remaining credit extensions.

NOTE 17 — FINANCIAL GUARANTEES

Old National holds instruments, in the normal course of business with clients, that are considered financial guarantees in accordance with FIN 45,Guarantor’s Accounting and Disclosure Requirements for Guarantees, Including Indirect Guarantees of Indebtedness of Others,which requires the Company to record the instruments at fair value. Standby letters of credit guarantees are issued in connection with agreements made by clients to counterparties. Standby letters of credit are contingent upon failure of the client to perform the terms of the underlying contract. Credit risk associated with standby letters of credit is essentially the same as that associated with extending loans to clients and is subject to normal credit policies. The term of these standby letters of credit is typically one year or less. At ~~September 30, 2008,~~March 31, 2009, the notional amount of standby letters of credit was ~~$111.0~~$109.7 million, which represents the maximum amount of future funding requirements, and the carrying value was ~~$0.4~~$0.5 million.

During the second quarter of 2007, Old National entered into a risk participation in an interest rate swap. The interest rate swap has a notional amount of ~~$9.6 million.~~$9.4 million at March 31, 2009.

Old National uses a funds transfer pricing (“FTP”) system to eliminate the effect of interest rate risk from net interest income in the community banking segment and from companies included in the “other” column. The FTP system is used to credit or charge each segment for the funds the segments create or use. The net FTP credit or charge is reflected in segment net interest income.

The financial information for each operating segment is reported on the basis used internally by Old National’s management to evaluate performance and is not necessarily comparable with similar information for any other financial institution.

Summarized financial information concerning segments is shown in the following table for the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30:~~March 31:


	Community											Community
(dollars in thousands)	Banking			Treasury			Other			Total		Banking		Treasury			Other			Total
Three months ended September 30, 2008
Three months ended March 31, 2009
Net interest income	$	63,799		$	(3,537	)	$	(666	)	$	59,596	$	69,458	$	(9,754	)	$	(506	)	$	59,198
Provision for loan losses		6,508			334			—			6,842		17,300		—			—			17,300
Noninterest income		21,228			2,319			15,448			38,995		20,176		4,200			17,859			42,235
Noninterest expense		55,856			742			15,865			72,463		59,478		1,448			16,538			77,464
Income (loss) before income taxes		22,663			(2,294	)		(1,083	)		19,286		12,856		(7,002	)		815			6,669
Total assets		4,892,941			2,569,476			105,871			7,568,288		4,853,040		3,392,117			110,911			8,356,068

Three months ended September 30, 2007
Net interest income	$	59,296		$	(3,366	)	$	(712	)	$	55,218
Provision for loan losses		(106	)		106			—			—
Noninterest income		19,418			1,906			16,247			37,571
Noninterest expense		49,191			954			15,350			65,495
Income (loss) before income taxes		29,629			(2,520	)		185			27,294
Total assets		4,992,685			2,716,897			122,903			7,832,485


Nine months ended September 30, 2008
Three months ended March 31, 2008
Net interest income	$	191,852		$	(9,218	)	$	(1,904	)	$	180,730	$	63,240	$	(3,029	)	$	(421	)	$	59,790
Provision for loan losses		33,887			560			—			34,447		21,886		19			—			21,905
Noninterest income		61,711			14,198			53,475			129,384		19,101		6,643			21,132			46,876
Noninterest expense		163,964			3,225			51,044			218,233		51,915		1,335			17,686			70,936
Income before income taxes		55,712			1,195			527			57,434		8,540		2,260			3,025			13,825
Total assets		4,892,941			2,569,476			105,871			7,568,288		4,935,482		2,670,811			117,173			7,723,466

Nine months ended September 30, 2007
Net interest income	$	172,994		$	(9,512	)	$	(2,121	)	$	161,361
Provision for loan losses		2,066			379			—			2,445
Noninterest income		55,634			3,035			52,398			111,067
Noninterest expense		153,536			3,392			50,034			206,962
Income (loss) before income taxes		73,026			(10,248	)		243			63,021
Total assets		4,992,685			2,716,897			122,903			7,832,485

NOTE 19 — FAIR VALUE

Effective January 1, 2008, the Company adopted SFAS No. 157 and SFAS No. 159. Both standards address aspects of the expanding application of fair value accounting.

SFAS No. 157 defines fair value as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. SFAS No. 157 also establishes a fair value hierarchy which requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. The standard describes three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair values:

~~Level 1 — Quoted prices (unadjusted) for identical assets or liabilities in active markets that the entity has the ability to access as of the measurement date.~~

Level 2 — Significant other observable inputs other than Level 1 prices such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities; quoted prices in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data.

~~Level 3 — Significant unobservable inputs that reflect a company’s own assumptions about the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability.~~

•		Level 1 — Quoted prices (unadjusted) for identical assets or liabilities in active markets that the entity has the ability to access as of the measurement date.

•		Level 2 — Significant other observable inputs other than Level 1 prices such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities; quoted prices in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data.

•		Level 3 — Significant unobservable inputs that reflect a company’s own assumptions about the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability.

Old National used the following methods and significant assumptions to estimate the fair value of each type of financial instrument:

Investment securities: The fair values for investment securities are determined by quoted market prices, if available ~~(Level~~(Level 1). For securities where quoted prices are not available, fair values are calculated based on market prices of similar securities (Level 2). For securities where quoted prices or market prices of similar securities are not available, fair values are calculated using discounted cash flows or other market indicators (Level 3). Discounted cash flows are calculated using spread to swap and libor curves that are updated to incorporate loss severities, volatility, credit spread and optionality. During times when trading is more liquid, broker quotes are used (if available) to validate the model. Rating agency and industry research reports as well as defaults and deferrals on individual securities are reviewed and incorporated into the calculations.

Residential loans held for sale: The fair value of loans held for sale is determined using quoted prices for a similar asset, adjusted for specific attributes of that loan (Level 2).

Derivative financial instruments: The fair values of derivative financial instruments are based on derivative valuation models using market data inputs as of the valuation date (Level 2).

Deposits: The fair value of retail certificates of deposit is estimated by discounting future cash flows using rates currently offered for deposits with similar remaining maturities (Level 2).

Assets and liabilities measured at fair value under SFAS No. 157 on a recurring basis, including financial assets and liabilities for which the Company has elected the fair value option, are summarized below:


			Fair Value Measurements at September 30, 2008 Using								Fair Value Measurements at March 31, 2009 Using
					Significant								Significant
			Quoted Prices in		Other		Significant				Quoted Prices in		Other		Significant
			Active Markets for		Observable		Unobservable				Active Markets for		Observable		Unobservable
	Carrying		Identical Assets		Inputs		Inputs		Carrying		Identical Assets		Inputs		Inputs
(dollars in thousands)	Value		(Level 1)		(Level 2)		(Level 3)		Value		(Level 1)		(Level 2)		(Level 3)

Financial Assets
Investment securities available-for-sale	$	1,923,752		—	$	1,904,232	$	19,520	$	2,710,303		—	$	2,699,148	$	11,155
Residential loans held for sale		11,118		—		11,118		—		19,609		—		19,609		—
Derivative assets		16,458		—		16,458		—		45,808		—		45,808		—
Financial Liabilities
Certain retail certificates of deposit		48,875		—		48,875		—		6,034		—		6,034		—
Derivative liabilities		16,991		—		16,991		—		44,534		—		44,534		—

Financial instruments recorded using SFAS No. 159

Under SFAS No. 159, the Company may elect to report most financial instruments and certain other items at fair value on an instrument-by instrument basis with changes in fair value reported in net income. After the initial adoption, the election is made at the acquisition of an eligible financial asset, financial liability or firm commitment or when certain specified reconsideration events occur. The fair value election may not be revoked once an election is made.

Additionally, the ~~transaction~~transition provisions of SFAS No. 159 permit a one-time election for existing positions at the adoption date with a cumulative-effect adjustment included in beginning retained earnings and future changes in fair value reported in net income. The Company did not elect the fair value option for any existing position at January 1, 2008.

The Company did elect the fair value option under SFAS No. 159 prospectively for the following items:

~~Residential mortgage loans held for sale~~

~~Certain retail certificates of deposit~~

	•		Residential mortgage loans held for sale

	•		Certain retail certificates of deposit

For items for which the fair value option has been elected, interest income is recorded in the consolidated statements of income based on the contractual amount of interest income earned on financial assets (except any that are on nonaccrual status). Included in the income statement are ~~$122~~$136 thousand and ~~$342~~$96 thousand of interest income for residential loans held for sale for the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively. Interest expense is recorded based on the contractual amount of interest expense incurred. The income statement includes ~~$437~~$71 thousand and ~~$1.0 million~~$144 thousand of interest expense for the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively, for certain retail certificates of deposit under SFAS No. 159.

Residential mortgage loans held for sale

Old National has elected the fair value option under SFAS No. 159 for newly originated conforming fixed-rate and adjustable-rate first mortgage loans held for sale. These loans are intended for sale and are hedged with derivative instruments. None of these loans are 90 days or more past due, nor are any on nonaccrual status. Old National has elected the fair value option to mitigate accounting mismatches in cases where hedge accounting is complex and to achieve operational simplification. The fair value option was not elected for loans held for investment. This election was effective for applicable loans originated ~~since~~after January 1, 2008.

Certain retail certificates of deposit

Old National has elected the fair value option under SFAS No. 159 for certain retail certificates of deposit; specifically, pools of retail certificates of deposit that have been matched with derivative instruments. Old National has elected the fair value option to mitigate accounting mismatches in cases where hedge accounting is complex and to achieve operational simplification. This election was adopted prospectively for certain retail certificates of deposit originated ~~since~~after January 1, 2008.

As of ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2009, the difference between the aggregate fair value and the aggregate remaining principal balance for loans and certificates of deposit for which the fair value option has been elected was as follows. Accrued interest at period end is included in the fair value of the instruments.


	Aggregate				Contractual
(dollars in thousands)	Fair Value		Difference		Principal
Residential loans held for sale	$	19,609	$	604	$	19,005
Certain retail certificates of deposit		6,034		144		5,890

~~NOTE 20 — SUBSEQUENT EVENT~~In accordance with FSP FAS 107-1, the carrying amounts and estimated fair values of financial instruments, not previously presented, at March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008 are as follows:

~~In response~~


	Carrying		Fair
(dollars in thousands)	Value		Value
March 31, 2009
Financial Assets
Cash, due from banks, federal funds sold and money market investments	$	174,095	$	174,095
Investment securities held-to-maturity		92,989		95,334
Federal Home Loan Bank stock		41,090		41,090
Loans, net (including impaired loans)		4,549,757		4,784,034
Accrued interest receivable		48,248		48,248

Financial Liabilities
Deposits	$	5,848,704	$	5,901,495
Short-term borrowings		827,092		827,078
Other borrowings		809,958		816,260
Accrued interest payable		17,369		17,369
Standby letters of credit		496		496

Off-Balance Sheet Financial Instruments
Commitments to extend credit	$	—	$	2,876


	Carrying		Fair
(dollars in thousands)	Value		Value
December 31, 2008
Financial Assets
Cash, due from banks, federal funds sold and money market investments	$	193,012	$	193,012
Investment securities held-to-maturity		99,661		100,831
Federal Home Loan Bank stock		41,090		41,090
Loans, net (including impaired loans)		4,693,272		4,997,869
Accrued interest receivable		49,030		49,030

Financial Liabilities
Deposits	$	5,372,978	$	5,425,134
Short-term borrowings		649,623		649,610
Other borrowings		834,867		850,569
Accrued interest payable		14,954		14,954
Standby letters of credit		494		494

Off-Balance Sheet Financial Instruments
Commitments to extend credit	$	—	$	1,614

The following methods and assumptions were used to estimate the fair value of each type of financial ~~crisis affecting~~instrument.

Cash, due from banks, federal funds sold and resell agreements and money market investments: For these instruments, the ~~banking system~~carrying amounts approximate fair value.

Investment securities: Fair values for investment securities held-to-maturity are based on quoted market prices, if available. For securities where quoted prices are not available, fair values are estimated based on market prices of similar securities.

Federal Home Loan Bank Stock: The carrying value of Federal Home Loan Bank stock approximates fair value based on the redemption provisions of the Federal Home Loan Bank.

Loans: The fair value of loans is estimated by discounting future cash flows using current rates at which similar loans would be made to borrowers with similar credit ratings and ~~financial markets~~for the same remaining maturities.

Deposits: The fair value of noninterest-bearing demand deposits and ~~going concern threats to investment banks~~savings, NOW and money market deposits is the amount payable as of the reporting date. The fair value of fixed-maturity certificates of deposit is estimated using rates currently offered for deposits with similar remaining maturities.

Short-term borrowings: Federal funds purchased and other ~~financial institutions,~~short-term borrowings generally have an original term to maturity of 30 days or less and, therefore, their carrying amount is a reasonable estimate of fair value. The fair value of securities sold under agreements to repurchase is estimated by discounting future cash flows using current interest rates.

Other borrowings: The fair value of medium-term notes, subordinated debt and senior bank notes is determined using market quotes. The fair value of FHLB advances is determined using quoted prices for new FHLB advances with similar risk characteristics. The fair value of other debt is determined using comparable security market prices or dealer quotes.

Standby letters of credit: Fair values for standby letters of credit are based on ~~October 3, 2008,~~fees currently charged to enter into similar agreements. The fair value for standby letters of credit was recorded in “Accrued expenses and other liabilities” on the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008 (the “EESA”) was signed into law. Pursuant to the EESA, the U.S. Treasury will have the authority to, among other things, purchase up to $700 billion of mortgages, mortgage-backed securities and certain otherconsolidated balance sheet in accordance with FIN 45.

Off-balance sheet financial instruments ~~from~~: Fair values for off-balance sheet credit-related financial ~~institutions for~~instruments are based on fees currently charged to enter into similar agreements. For further information regarding the ~~purpose~~notional amounts of ~~stabilizing~~these financial instruments, see Notes 16 and ~~providing liquidity to the U.S. financial markets.~~

On October 14, 2008, Secretary Paulson, after consulting with the Federal Reserve and the FDIC, announced that the Department of the Treasury will purchase equity stakes in a wide variety of banks and thrifts. Under this program, known as the Troubled Asset Relief Program Capital Purchase Program (the “TARP Capital Purchase Program”), from the $700 billion authorized by the EESA, the Treasury will make $250 billion of capital available to U.S. financial institutions in the form of preferred stock. In conjunction with the purchase of preferred stock, the Treasury will receive warrants to purchase common stock with an aggregate market price equal to 15% of the preferred investment. Participating financial institutions will be required to adopt the Treasury’s standards for executive compensation and corporate governance for the period during which the Treasury holds equity issued under the TARP Capital Purchase Program. On October 27, 2008, Old National was notified that they had been preliminarily approved to participate in the TARP Capital Purchase Program and is eligible for $150 million of capital. The Company has thirty days to determine if it will commit to participate in the program.

Also on October 14, 2008, after receiving a recommendation from the boards of the FDIC and the Federal Reserve, and consulting with the President, Secretary Paulson signed the systemic risk exception to the FDIC Act, enabling the FDIC to temporarily provide a 100% guarantee of the senior debt of all FDIC-insured institutions and their holding companies, as well as deposits in non-interest bearing transaction deposit accounts under a Temporary Liquidity Guarantee Program. Coverage under the Temporary Liquidity Guarantee Program is available for 30 days without charge and thereafter at a cost of 75 basis points per annum for senior unsecured debt and 10 basis points per annum for non-interest bearing transaction deposits. The Corporation is assessing its participation in the Temporary Liquidity Guarantee Program but has not yet made a definitive decision as to whether it will participate.17.

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following discussion is an analysis of our results of operations for the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2009 and 2008, ~~and 2007,~~ and financial condition as of ~~September 30, 2008,~~March 31, 2009, compared to ~~September 30, 2007,~~March 31, 2008, and December 31, ~~2007.~~2008. This discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and related notes. This discussion contains forward-looking statements concerning our business that are based on estimates and involves certain risks and uncertainties. Therefore, future results could differ significantly from our current expectations and the related forward-looking statements.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Old National began 2009 celebrating its 175^th anniversary. The company has grown from about $160 thousand in assets in 1834 to approximately $8.4 billion today.

On March 20, 2009, Old National completed the acquisition of Citizens Financial’s Indiana franchise. This acquisition adds 65 locations to our footprint and positions Old National with the third largest branch network in the state of Indiana. Included in the purchase were 6 full-service banking centers, 59 “in-store” locations and 66 ATMs. The in-store locations are inside select general merchandise and food stores. Some of these branches overlap with certain of Old National’s existing financial centers and management has announced plans to close eight of these banking centers which could result in $8.0 to $10.0 million of additional costs associated with the acquisition in 2009. As always, the Company will continue to rationalize our branch network based on traffic patterns and customer needs.

On March 31, 2009, Old National repurchased all of the $100 million in preferred, non-voting stock that was sold to the U.S. Department of Treasury as part of the Capital Purchase Program. Subsequent to quarter end, the Company submitted its notice of intent to repurchase the Warrant for up to 813,008 shares of the Company’s common stock issued by the Company to Treasury on December 12, 2008. The Warrant was issued in connection with the Company’s participation in Treasury’s Capital Purchase Program. This repurchase will be the second and final phase required of Old National to end its participation in the Capital Purchase Program (CPP).

Net income for the ~~third~~first quarter of ~~2008~~2009 is ~~$17.0~~$9.4 million, compared to ~~$19.5~~$6.6 million and ~~$22.6~~$19.3 million for the quarters ended ~~June 30,~~December 31, 2008 and ~~September 30, 2007,~~March 31, 2008, respectively. ~~Third~~Results for the first quarter ~~earnings decreased $2.5~~of 2009 were impacted by a $3.0 million ~~from~~charge for direct acquisition costs related to the ~~prior quarter primarily as a result~~acquisition of ~~lower~~Charter One’s Indiana franchise and net ~~interest income and higher provision expense. Securities~~securities gains ~~in the third quarter~~of $5.6 million, which were ~~$45 thousand compared to $2.1~~partially offset by other-than-temporary impairment of $2.4 million realized during the ~~second~~quarter. The first quarter ~~however, the third quarter benefited from the reversal~~ of ~~approximately $2.1~~2009 also includes $2.4 million of performance-based compensation expense. The third quarter of 2007 benefited from no provision expense, a $1.6 million recovery of interest on a commercial real estate loan, and a $1.8 million release of a portion of the unrecognized tax benefit liability.seasonal insurance contingency revenue.

Net interest margin in the ~~third~~first quarter of 2008 was ~~3.79%~~3.63% compared to ~~3.85%~~3.96% during the ~~second~~fourth quarter of 2008, and ~~3.37%~~3.68% year-over-year. The margin ~~remained strong~~retreated in the ~~third~~first quarter of ~~2008~~2009 despite a slight ~~decline~~increase in average earning assets ~~and~~due to our shift to a more ~~neutral~~asset sensitive balance sheet, or a balance sheet in which assets re-price more quickly than funding costs. Management is ~~less sensitive~~taking action to ~~falling interest rates.~~reduce our asset sensitivity and increase asset yields.

Although we believe our conservative stance toward underwriting policies and real estate lending has positioned us well, the credit markets continue to be a challenge in ~~2008.~~2009. We recorded provision expense of ~~$6.8~~$17.3 million during the ~~third~~first quarter and are seeing ~~core~~ credit quality starting to ~~soften.~~soften in expanded sectors. Non-accrual loans ~~remained relatively flat~~increased $13.4 million compared to the prior quarter, however, criticized and classified loans ~~increased 16.5%.~~improved slightly. We remain cautious on consumer, construction and commercial real estate credit quality. As a percent of total loans, the allowance was ~~1.36%~~1.55% at ~~September 30, 2008,~~March 31, 2009, compared to ~~1.31%~~1.41% and ~~1.35%~~1.54% at ~~June 30,~~December 31, 2008 and ~~September 30, 2007,~~March 31, 2008, respectively. ~~Net charge- offs~~Annualized net charge-offs were ~~0.46%~~1.07% of average loans in the ~~third~~first quarter of ~~2008~~2009 compared to ~~1.35%~~1.14% in the ~~second~~fourth quarter of 2008, and ~~0.28%~~0.52% year-over-year. Nonperforming loans totaled ~~1.46%~~1.67% of total loans at ~~September 30, 2008,~~March 31, 2009, compared to ~~1.43%~~1.34% at ~~June 30,~~December 31, 2008 and ~~1.04%~~1.50% a year ago.

In addition to the provision, management has been monitoring our investment portfolio very closely. As of September 30, 2008, we had no other than temporary impairment. We had no Lehman Brothers exposure in the available-for-sale investment portfolio at September 30 and only 2.7% of the securities are associated with companies in the financial services industry. In addition, only 1% of the investment portfolio’s market value, or approximately $19.5 million, is invested in pooled trust preferred securities.

During the remainder of ~~2008, we will continue to focus on~~2009, maintaining our well-capitalized position ~~improving~~will be our ~~risk profile,~~primary focus. On April 23, 2009, we announced our intent to reduce the second quarter dividend to $0.07 per share. Until the economy emerges from this challenging environment, we feel it is only prudent to conserve capital. Our ability to grow organically or through future bank acquisition opportunities will be predicated on our ability to remain a strong and ~~managing through this unprecedented credit cycle.~~profitable bank.

Taxable equivalent net interest income was ~~$64.5 million and $194.6~~$65.1 million for the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30, 2008,~~March 31, 2009, up from the ~~$59.5 million and $174.1~~$64.2 million reported for the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30, 2007.~~March 31, 2008. The net interest margin was ~~3.79% and 3.77%~~3.63% for the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30, 2008,~~March 31, 2009, compared to ~~3.37% and 3.19%~~3.68% for the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30, 2007.~~March 31, 2008. The increase in ~~both~~ net interest income ~~and~~is primarily due to the increase in interest earning assets being greater than the increase in interest-bearing liabilities. The decrease in net interest margin is primarily due to ~~the decrease in the cost of funding being greater than the decrease in the earning asset yields, combined with~~ a change in the mix of interest earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities. The yield on average earning assets decreased 8898 basis points from ~~6.77%~~6.25% to ~~5.89% while the~~5.27%. The cost of interest-bearing liabilities decreased ~~139~~105 basis points from ~~3.84%~~2.98% to 2.45% in the quarterly year-over-year comparison. In the year-to-date comparison, the yield on average earning assets decreased 61 basis points from 6.65% to 6.04% while the cost of interest-bearing liabilities decreased 126 basis points from 3.89% to 2.63%1.93%.

Average earning assets were ~~$6.804~~$7.177 billion for the three months ended ~~September 30, 2008,~~March 31, 2009, compared to ~~$7.067~~$6.974 billion for the three months ended ~~September 30, 2007, a decrease~~March 31, 2008, an increase of ~~3.7%~~2.9%, or $263.0 million. Average earning assets were $6.878 billion for the nine months ended September 30, 2008, compared to $7.288 billion for the nine months ended September 30, 2007, a decrease of 5.6%, or $410.0$203.5 million. Significantly affecting average earning assets at ~~September 30, 2008~~March 31, 2009 compared to ~~September 30, 2007,~~March 31, 2008, was the ~~reduction~~increase in the size of the investment portfolio combined with the reduction of the size of the loan portfolio. During the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September 30, 2008, $259.8~~March 31, 2009, $836.9 million of investment securities were ~~sold~~purchased and ~~$384.7~~$191.2 million of investment securities were called by the ~~issuers.~~issuers or sold. In addition, commercial and commercial real estate loans have been affected by continued weak loan demand in our markets, more stringent loan underwriting standards and our desire to lower future potential credit risk by being cautious towards the real estate market. During the fourth quarter of 2007, we sold $6.7 million of nonaccrual and substandard commercial and commercial real estate loans. During the first quarter of 2008, we sold $2.2 million of commercial loans. Year over year, ~~commercial and consumer loans,~~the investment portfolio, which ~~have~~generally has an average yield ~~higher~~lower than the ~~investment~~loan portfolio, ~~have~~has increased as a percent of interest earning assets.

Also affecting margin was ~~a decrease~~an increase in noninterest-bearing demand deposits and time deposits. ~~During the fourth quarter of 2007, we called $43.1~~Included in deposits at March 31, 2009 are $89.8 million of ~~high cost brokered certificates of deposit~~noninterest-bearing deposits and ~~$25.5~~$162.8 million of ~~retail certificates of deposit.~~time deposits from the Citizens Financial branch acquisition. During ~~the first nine months of~~ 2008, ~~$118.2~~$137.6 million of high cost brokered certificates of deposit were called or matured and $100.5 million of retail certificates of deposit were called. ~~In addition, a~~A $50 million bank note matured in the first quarter of 2008 and $100 million of medium-term notes matured in the second quarter of ~~2008 and $26~~2008. In addition, $51 million of FHLB advances matured in the ~~third~~last half of 2008 and a revolving credit facility with $55 million outstanding was paid off in the fourth quarter of 2008. During the first quarter of 2009, $65.0 million of high cost brokered certificates of deposit were called and $50.9 million of retail certificates of deposit were called. In addition, $25.0 million of FHLB advances were prepaid in the first quarter of 2009. Year over year, brokered certificates of deposit, which have an average interest rate higher than other types of deposits, have decreased as a percent of interest-bearing liabilities. Borrowed funds have increased as a percent of interest-bearing liabilities, due to our ability to ~~purchase~~obtain low-cost ~~FHLB advances during 2008.~~short-term borrowings. Year over year, noninterest-bearing demand deposits have increased as a percent of total funding.

Provision for Loan Losses

The provision for loan losses was ~~$6.8~~$17.3 million for the three months ended ~~September 30, 2008, with a $34.4~~March 31, 2009, compared to $21.9 million ~~provision~~ for ~~loan losses year-to-date. The~~the three months ended March 31, 2008. Included in the 2008 provision ~~compares to no provision during the third quarter of 2007 and $2.4~~is $17.0 million ~~provision for the nine months ended September 30, 2007. The higher provision in 2008 is primarily attributable to the increase in nonaccrual loans in the first quarter of 2008~~ associated with the misconduct of a former loan officer in the Indianapolis market and subsequent deterioration of these credits. See the discussion in “Allowance for Loan Losses and Reserve for Unfunded Commitments” in the Risk Management section of Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations for additional information.

Noninterest Income

We generate revenues in the form of noninterest income through client fees and sales commissions from our core banking franchise and other related businesses, such as wealth management, investment consulting, investment products and insurance. Noninterest income for the three months ended ~~September 30, 2008,~~March 31, 2009, was ~~$39.0~~$42.2 million, ~~an increase~~a decrease of ~~$1.4~~$4.7 million, or ~~3.7%~~9.9%, from the ~~$37.6~~$46.9 million reported for the three months ended September 30, 2007. For the nine months ended September 30, 2008, noninterest income was $129.4 million, an increase of $18.3 million, or 16.5%, from the $111.1 million reported for the nine months ended September 30, 2007.March 31, 2008.

Net securities gains were ~~$45 thousand and $6.6 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008, compared to net securities losses of $0.5 million and~~ $3.2 million for the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30, 2007.~~March 31, 2009, compared to net securities gains of $4.5 million for the three months ended March 31, 2008. Included in the first quarter of 2009 is a $2.4 million charge for other-than-temporary-impairment on three pooled trust preferred securities. The 2008 net securities gains were primarily the result of securities which were called by the issuers. Partially offsetting these gains during the third quarter is a $1.0 million loss related to the sale of $2.0 million of Lehman Brothers securities. At September 30, 2008, we had no Lehman Brothers securities remaining in the investment portfolio. The 2007 net securities losses resulted from the balance sheet restructuring.

~~ATM~~Wealth management fees ~~increased by $0.7 million and $2.5~~were $3.8 million for the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30, 2008~~March 31, 2009 as compared to $4.6 million for the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30, 2007. The increase is primarily attributable to~~March 31, 2008. Trust fee income has declined as a ~~higher volume~~result of ~~debit card usage.~~lower market values of managed assets.

Revenue from company-owned life insurance ~~increased $0.5 million and $1.3~~was $0.7 million for the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30, 2008 as~~March 31, 2009 compared to $2.8 million for the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30, 2007.~~March 31, 2008. During the third quarter of 2008, the crediting rate formula for the 1997 company-owned life insurance policy was amended to adopt a more conservative position and improve the overall market to book value ratio. This change ~~will result~~resulted in lower revenues ~~from company-owned life insurance~~in the first quarter of 2009 and we anticipate these lower revenue levels to continue in future periods.

~~Amortization~~Fluctuations in the value of ~~deferred gains associated with~~our derivatives resulted in a gain on derivatives of $0.5 million in the ~~sale leaseback transactions were $1.6 million and $4.8 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008,~~first quarter of 2009 as compared to ~~$0.8~~a loss on derivatives of $0.6 million ~~and $0.9 million for~~in the ~~three and nine months ended September 30, 2007. As discussed in Note 16 to the consolidated financial statements, we entered into a series~~first quarter of ~~sale and leaseback transactions beginning in December of 2006. The majority of the gains associated with these transactions were deferred and are being amortized over the term of the leases.~~2008.

Other income decreased ~~$0.5~~$1.5 million for the three months ended ~~September 30, 2008~~March 31, 2009 as compared to the three months ended ~~September 30, 2007, and increased $2.0 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 as compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2007.~~March 31, 2008. The decrease ~~in the quarterly comparison~~ was ~~primarily as a result of an increase in losses on sales of other real estate owned. The increase in the nine month comparison is~~ primarily as a result of a $1.5 million gain associated with the redemption of class B VISA shares recorded during the first quarter of ~~2008 combined with an increase in customer derivative fee revenue.~~2008.

Noninterest Expense

Noninterest expense for the three months ended ~~September 30, 2008,~~March 31, 2009, totaled ~~$72.5~~$77.5 million, an increase of ~~$7.0~~$6.5 million, or ~~10.6%~~9.2%, from the ~~$65.5~~$70.9 million recorded for the three months ended ~~September 30, 2007. For the nine months ended September 30, 2008,~~March 31, 2008. Included in noninterest expense ~~was $218.2 million, an increase of $11.2 million, or 5.4%, from the $207.0 million recorded~~ for the ~~nine months ended September 30, 2007.~~first quarter of 2009 is approximately $3.0 million of one-time expenses related to the Citizens Financial branch acquisition.

Salaries and benefits is the largest component of noninterest expense. For the three months ended ~~September 30, 2008,~~March 31, 2009, salaries and benefits were ~~$40.5~~$42.7 million compared to ~~$39.6~~$42.3 million for the three months ended ~~September 30, 2007.~~March 31, 2008. Included in the ~~third~~first quarter of ~~2008~~2009 is an increase of approximately $0.8 million for pension expense and $0.4 million for higher medical insurance expenses. Partially offsetting these increases was a $1.0 million reversal of ~~approximately $2.1 million of restricted stock and other~~ performance-based incentive compensation expense compared to a $0.7 million adjustment during the third quarter of 2007. For the nine months ended September 30, 2008, salaries and benefits were $126.0 million compared to $122.5 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2007. The nine months of 2008 includes higher performance-based compensation, medical insurance expenses and an additional $1.1 million of personnel expense associated with the acquisition of St. Joseph Capital Corporation on February 1, 2007.expense.

Occupancy expense increased ~~to $9.8 million and $29.0~~$0.9 million for the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30, 2008,~~March 31, 2009, compared to ~~$5.9 million and $17.8 million for~~ the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30, 2007,~~March 31, 2008, primarily as a result of an increase in rent expense. Utilities expense and real estate taxes also increased for the three months ended March 31, 2009 as compared to the three months ended March 31, 2008. The increase in rent expense is related to the sale leaseback transactions discussed in Note 16 to the consolidated financial ~~statements. Partially offsetting~~statements and the ~~increase in rent expense was a decrease in depreciation expense, also related to the sale leaseback transactions.~~additional 65 branches acquired from Citizens Financial.

~~Marketing expense~~Professional fees increased ~~by $1.4 million and $1.5~~$1.0 million for the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30, 2008~~March 31, 2009 as compared to the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30, 2007.~~March 31, 2008. Increases in ~~newspaper, radio~~legal and ~~direct mail advertising~~other professional fees related to the Citizens Financial branch acquisition were the primary reason for the ~~increases.~~

~~During the first quarter of 2007, we recorded a $1.2 million loss on the extinguishment of debt related to the early retirement of Federal Home Loan Bank advances and repurchase agreements.~~increase.

~~During the second quarter of 2008, we recorded $0.7~~FDIC assessment expense was $2.1 million for impairment of intangibles due to the loss of a significant insurance client at one of our insurance subsidiaries. The insurance subsidiary is included in the “Other” column for segment reporting. The first quarter of 2007 included $1.2 million of impairment associated with eight financial centers that we consolidated into other higher performing financial centers during the first quarter of 2007.

~~Other expense~~ for the three months ended ~~September 30, 2008, totaled $5.4~~March 31, 2009, compared to $0.3 million ~~an increase of $1.0 million compared to~~for the three months ended ~~September 30, 2007. Other expense for the nine months ended September 30, 2008, totaled $13.9 million, a decrease of $1.1 million compared~~March 31, 2008. The increase is primarily due to the ~~nine months ended September 30, 2007. Increases in loan collection expenses and the provision for unfunded commitments were the primary reason for the~~ increase in the quarterly comparison. Included in the first quarter of 2007 is a $1.2 million charge to terminate leases on certain financial centers that were consolidated into more profitable centers. Also included in other expense is the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) assessment expense. On October 7, 2008, the FDIC voted to adopt a restoration plan accompanied by a notice of proposed rulemaking that would increase the rates banks pay for deposit insurance. The FDIC implemented a special assessment of 20 basis points taking effect on April 1, 2009 that will apply to assessments for the second quarter of 2009 and thereafter. We anticipate a significant increase in our assessment ~~beginning~~expense in 2009 as a result of both the increase in the assessment and the expiration of our one-time assessment credit. It is possible that certain legislation, if passed in the future, could reduce the special assessment to 10 basis points or lower.

Other expense for the three months ended March 31, 2009, totaled $4.1 million, an increase of $1.9 million compared to the three months ended March 31, 2008. The provision for unfunded commitments increased $0.8 million for the three months ended March 31, 2009 as compared to the three months ended March 31, 2008. Included in the first quarter of 2009 is approximately $1.0 million of one-time expenses related to the acquisition of the retail branch banking network of Citizens Financial Group.

Provision for Income Taxes

We record a provision for income taxes currently payable and for income taxes payable or benefits to be received in the future, which arise due to timing differences in the recognition of certain items for financial statement and income tax purposes. The major difference between the effective tax rate applied to our financial statement income and the federal statutory tax rate is caused by interest on tax-exempt securities and loans. The provision for income taxes, as a percentage of pre-tax income, was ~~11.8%~~(41.0)% for the three months ended ~~September 30, 2008,~~March 31, 2009, compared to ~~17.3%~~(39.9)% for the three months ended ~~September 30, 2007.~~March 31, 2008. The ~~provision for income taxes, as a percentage of pre-tax income, was 2.8%~~main factor for the ~~nine months ended September 30, 2008, compared to 16.1% for~~decrease in the ~~nine months ended September 30, 2007. The lower~~ effective tax rate for the three months ended ~~September 30, 2008, resulted from~~March 31, 2009, was that the tax-exempt income comprised a higher percentage of ~~tax-exempt~~pre-tax income ~~to income before income taxes compared to~~in the three months ended ~~September 30, 2007. The lower effective tax rate for the nine months ended September 30, 2008, was primarily a result of a decrease in the unrecognized tax benefit liability.~~March 31, 2009 than at March 31, 2008. See ~~note~~Note 14 to the consolidated financial statements for additional information.

FINANCIAL CONDITION

Overview

At ~~September 30, 2008,~~March 31, 2009, our assets were ~~$7.568~~$8.356 billion, a ~~3.4% decrease~~8.2% increase compared to ~~September 30, 2007~~March 31, 2008 assets of ~~$7.832~~$7.723 billion, and an annualized ~~decrease~~increase of ~~4.7%~~24.5% compared to December 31, ~~2007~~2008 assets of ~~$7.846~~$7.874 billion. On March 20, 2009, Old National completed its acquisition of the Indiana retail branch banking network of Citizens Financial Group, which increased assets by approximately $424.7 million. The ~~reduction of $238.3 million of~~increase in investment securities in the ~~first nine~~past twelve months ~~of 2008 combined with a~~more than offset the decrease in ~~commercial real estate~~the loan ~~balances~~portfolio and ~~the various sale-leaseback transactions have lowered our total assets, reducing our reliance on high-cost deposits~~cash and ~~brokered certificates of deposit.~~cash equivalents. Year over year, ~~brokered certificates of deposit, which have an average interest rate higher than other types of~~ deposits have ~~decreased as~~increased, primarily due to the Citizens Financial branch acquisition, and to a ~~percent of interest-bearing liabilities.~~lesser extent, increases in organic core deposit growth. Borrowed funds have increased ~~as a percent of interest-bearing liabilities~~ due to our ability to obtain low-cost ~~FHLB advances during 2008.~~short-term borrowings.

At ~~September 30, 2008,~~March 31, 2009, the investment securities portfolio was ~~$2.070~~$2.844 billion compared to ~~$2.262~~$2.147 billion at ~~September 30, 2007, a decrease~~March 31, 2008, an increase of ~~$191.8~~$697.6 million or ~~8.5%~~32.5%. Investment securities ~~decreased $238.3~~increased $578.6 million compared to December 31, ~~2007,~~2008, an annualized ~~decrease~~increase of ~~13.8%~~102.1%. Investment securities represented ~~30.5%~~37.8% of earning assets at ~~September 30, 2008,~~March 31, 2009, compared to ~~32.2%~~31.1% at ~~September 30, 2007,~~March 31, 2008, and ~~32.9%~~32.0% at December 31, ~~2007. Approximately $384.7 million of~~2008. Funds received in the Citizens Financial branch acquisition have been invested primarily in investment ~~securities were called~~securities. Commercial and commercial real estate loans have been affected by ~~their issuers~~continued weak loan demand in our markets, more stringent loan underwriting standards and ~~$259.8 million of investment securities were sold during~~our desire to lower future potential credit risk by being cautious towards the ~~first nine months of 2008. The cash proceeds from these sales were used to purchase similarly yielding securities and to reduce brokered certificates of deposit.~~real estate market. Stronger commercial loan demand in the future could result in increased investments in loans and a ~~continued~~ reduction in the investment securities portfolio.

The investment securities available-for-sale portfolio had net unrealized losses of ~~$74.2~~$57.0 million at ~~September 30, 2008,~~March 31, 2009, an increase of ~~$46.6~~$54.1 million compared to net unrealized losses of ~~$27.6~~$2.9 million at ~~September 30, 2007,~~March 31, 2008, and ~~an increase~~a decrease of ~~$67.4~~$7.6 million compared to net unrealized losses of ~~$6.7~~$64.6 million at December 31, ~~2007. The increase~~2008. A $2.4 million charge was recorded during the first quarter of 2009 related to other-than-temporary-impairment on three pooled trust preferred securities. Contributing to the volatility in net unrealized losses over the past twelve months ~~was primarily attributable to~~are changes in interest rates and the financial crisis affecting the banking system and financial markets.

The investment portfolio had an average duration of ~~4.76~~4.64 years at ~~September 30, 2008,~~March 31, 2009, compared to ~~3.30~~3.56 years at ~~September 30, 2007,~~March 31, 2008, and ~~2.96~~3.87 years at December 31, ~~2007.~~2008. The annualized average yields on investment securities, on a taxable equivalent basis, were ~~5.38%~~5.45% for the three months ended ~~September 30, 2008,~~March 31, 2009, compared to ~~5.18%~~5.07% for the three months ended ~~September 30, 2007,~~March 31, 2008, and ~~5.21%~~5.62% for the three months ended December 31, 2007. Average yields on investment securities, on a taxable equivalent basis, were 5.25%, 5.11% and 5.13% for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, and for the year ended December 31, 2007, respectively.2008.

Residential Loans Held for Sale

Residential loans held for sale were ~~$11.1~~$19.6 million at ~~September 30, 2008,~~March 31, 2009, compared to ~~$13.3~~$10.2 million at ~~September 30, 2007,~~March 31, 2008, and ~~$13.0~~$17.2 million at December 31, ~~2007.~~2008. Residential loans held for sale are loans that are closed, but not yet purchased by investors. The amount of residential loans held for sale on the balance sheet varies depending on the amount of originations and timing of loan sales to the secondary market. The ~~decrease~~increase in residential loans held for sale from ~~September 30, 2007,~~March 31, 2008, is primarily attributable to increased ~~efficiencies~~activity in ~~processing loan sales~~residential lending in late 2008 and the ~~timing~~first quarter of ~~loan sales to the secondary market.~~2009.

We elected the fair value option under SFAS No. 159 prospectively for residential loans held for sale. The election was effective for loans originated ~~since~~after January 1, 2008. The aggregate fair value exceeded the unpaid principal balances by $0.6 million, $0.6 million and $0.2 million as of ~~September 30, 2008.~~March 31, 2009, December 31, 2008 and March 31, 2008, respectively.

Commercial and Commercial Real Estate Loans

Commercial and commercial real estate loans are the largest classification within earning assets, representing ~~43.7%~~39.1% of earning assets at ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2009, a decrease from 43.1% at March 31, 2008, ~~an increase~~and a decrease from ~~42.7% at September 30, 2007, and an increase from 42.3%~~43.2% at December 31, ~~2007.~~2008. At ~~September 30, 2008,~~March 31, 2009, commercial and commercial real estate loans were ~~$2.971~~$2.943 billion, a decrease of ~~$30.3~~$32.3 million since ~~September 30, 2007,~~March 31, 2008, and ~~an increase~~a decrease of ~~$5.4~~$109.6 million since December 31, ~~2007.~~2008. Commercial loans have increased ~~$107.2~~$69.2 million since ~~September 30, 2007~~March 31, 2008 while commercial real estate loans have decreased ~~$137.5~~$101.5 million since September 30, 2007. During the last quarter of 2007, we sold $4.3 million of commercial and $2.4 million of commercial real estate loans. During the first quarter of 2008, we sold $2.2 million of commercial loans.March 31, 2008. Weak loan demand in our markets continues to affect loan growth. Our conservative underwriting standards have also contributed to slower loan growth. We continue to be cautious towards the real estate market in an effort to lower credit risk.

Residential Real Estate Loans

Residential real estate loans, primarily 1-4 family properties, have decreased in significance to the loan portfolio over the past five years due to higher levels of loan sales into the secondary market, primarily to private investors. We sell the majority of residential real estate loans originated as a strategy to better manage interest rate risk and liquidity. We sell almost all residential real estate loans servicing released without recourse.

At ~~September 30, 2008,~~March 31, 2009, residential real estate loans were ~~$508.1~~$488.5 million, a decrease of ~~$31.2~~$40.0 million, or ~~5.8%~~7.6%, from ~~September 30, 2007.~~March 31, 2008.

Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets

Goodwill and other intangible assets at ~~September 30, 2008,~~March 31, 2009, totaled ~~$187.8~~$205.6 million, ~~a decrease~~an increase of ~~$4.1~~$15.3 million compared to ~~$191.9~~$190.3 million at ~~September 30, 2007,~~March 31, 2008, and ~~a decrease~~an increase of ~~$3.2~~$18.8 million compared to ~~$191.0~~$186.8 million at December 31, ~~2007. During~~2008. We recorded $19.8 million of goodwill and other intangible assets associated with the ~~second quarter~~acquisition of ~~2008, we recorded $0.7 million for impairment~~the Indiana retail branch banking network of ~~intangibles due to the loss of a significant insurance client at one of our insurance subsidiaries. The insurance subsidiary~~Citizens Financial Group, which is included in the ~~“Other”~~“Community Banking” column for segment reporting. The remaining decreases were the result of standard amortization expense related to the other intangible assets.

Assets Held for Sale

Assets held for sale were $2.0 million at March 31, 2009, a decrease of $1.0 million compared to $3.0 million at ~~September 30, 2008, a decrease of $28.1 million compared to $31.1 million at September 30, 2007.~~March 31, 2008. The sale leaseback transactions during ~~2007 and the first nine months of~~ 2008 were the reason for the decline. Included in assets held for sale at ~~September 30, 2008~~March 31, 2009 are ~~five~~four financial centers that are pending sale. We plan to continue occupying these properties under long-term lease agreements.

Other assets have increased ~~$48.4~~$74.1 million, or ~~39.4%~~47.5%, since ~~December~~March 31, ~~2007~~2008, primarily as a result of an increase in deferred tax ~~assets.~~assets and fluctuations in the fair value of derivative financial instruments.

Funding

Total funding, comprised of deposits and wholesale borrowings, was ~~$6.725~~$7.492 billion at ~~September 30, 2008, a decrease~~March 31, 2009, an increase of ~~4.1%~~9.8% from ~~$7.014~~$6.822 billion at ~~September 30, 2007,~~March 31, 2008, and an annualized ~~decrease~~increase of ~~4.5%~~33.9% from ~~$6.958~~$6.907 billion at December 31, ~~2007.~~2008. Included in total funding were deposits of ~~$5.346~~$5.855 billion at ~~September 30, 2008, a decrease~~March 31, 2009, an increase of ~~$528.3~~$508.3 million, or ~~9.0%~~9.5%, compared to ~~September 30, 2007,~~March 31, 2008, and ~~a decrease~~an increase of ~~$317.2~~$432.5 million compared to December 31, ~~2007.~~2008. Included in total deposits at March 31, 2009 is $427.6 million from the acquisition of the Indiana retail branch banking network of Citizens Financial Group. In ~~the last quarter of 2007, we called $43.1 million of high cost brokered certificates of deposit and $25.5 million of retail certificates of deposit. In the first nine months of~~ 2008, we called $100.5 million of retail certificates of deposit; and ~~$118.2~~$137.6 million of high cost brokered certificates of deposit were called or matured. ~~Savings~~During the first quarter of 2009, $65.0 million of high cost brokered certificates of deposit were called and $50.9 million of retail certificates of deposit were called. Noninterest-bearing deposits increased ~~41.3%~~20.7% or ~~$269.8~~$178.2 million compared to ~~September 30, 2007. Money market~~March 31, 2008. Time deposits ~~decreased 35.0%~~increased 22.2% or ~~$241.7 million and time deposits decreased 15.8% or $357.0~~$384.2 million compared to ~~September 30, 2007.~~March 31, 2008. Year over year, we have experienced a shift into lower cost deposit types.

Effective January 1, 2008, we elected the fair value option under SFAS No. 159 prospectively for certain retail certificates of deposit. The ~~balance~~carrying value of these retail certificates of deposit was ~~$49.2~~$6.0 million, $49.3 million and $41.4 million as of ~~September 30, 2008.~~March 31, 2009, December 31, 2008 and March 31, 2008, respectively. The ~~aggregate~~carrying values at March 31, 2009, December 31, 2008 and March 31, 2008 were comprised of contractual balances of $5.9 million, $48.5 million and $41.1 million and fair value ~~was lower than the carrying value by~~adjustments of $0.1 million, $0.8 million and $0.3 million, ~~as of September 30, 2008.~~respectively.

We use wholesale funding to augment deposit funding and to help maintain our desired interest rate risk position. At ~~September 30, 2008,~~March 31, 2009, wholesale borrowings, including short-term borrowings and other borrowings, increased ~~$239.8~~$161.7 million, or ~~21.1%~~11.0%, from ~~September 30, 2007~~March 31, 2008 and increased ~~$84.0~~$152.6 million, or ~~8.6%~~41.1%, annualized, from December 31, ~~2007,~~2008, respectively. Wholesale funding as a percentage of total funding was ~~20.5%~~21.9% at ~~September 30, 2008,~~March 31, 2009, compared to ~~16.2%~~21.6% at ~~September 30, 2007,~~March 31, 2008, and ~~18.6%~~21.5% at December 31, ~~2007.~~2008. Short-term borrowings have increased ~~$14.6~~$186.6 million since ~~September 30, 2007~~March 31, 2008 while long-term borrowings have ~~increased $225.2~~decreased $24.9 million since ~~September 30, 2007.~~March 31, 2008. We purchased ~~$355.0~~$380.0 of million low-cost FHLB advances during ~~the first nine months of~~ 2008. In addition, ~~a $50 million bank note matured in the first quarter of 2008,~~ $100 million of medium-term notes matured in the second quarter of 2008, ~~and $26~~$51.0 million of FHLB advances matured in the ~~third~~last half of 2008 and a revolving credit facility with $55.0 million outstanding was paid off in the fourth quarter of 2008. ~~At September 30, 2008, we had drawn $55~~During the first quarter of 2009, $25.0 million ~~on our revolving credit facility which is included in short-term borrowings. The proceeds~~of FHLB advances were ~~used to help retire the medium term notes.~~

Other liabilities have increased $36.4 million, or 21.2%, since September 30, 2007 primarily as a result of the deferred gains arising from the sale leaseback transactions that we entered into during 2007 and 2008.prepaid.

3538

Capital

Shareholders’ equity totaled ~~$635.4~~$631.8 million at ~~September 30, 2008,~~March 31, 2009, compared to ~~$647.4~~$675.4 million at ~~September 30, 2007,~~March 31, 2008, and ~~$652.9~~$730.9 million at December 31, ~~2007.~~2008. The primary reason for the increase in shareholders’ equity at December 31, 2008, was the issuance of non-voting preferred shares and common stock warrants to the Treasury Department as part of the Capital Purchase Program for healthy financial institutions. On March 31, 2009, we accelerated the accretion of the $2.6 million discount and repurchased all of the $100 million of non-voting preferred shares from the Treasury Department, which is the primary reason for the decrease in shareholders’ equity at March 31, 2009. The common stock warrants were still outstanding at March 31, 2009, but we anticipate they will be repurchased during the second quarter of 2009.

As part of the TARP CPP, we entered into a Letter Agreement and Securities Purchase Agreement with the Treasury Department on December 12, 2008, pursuant to which Old National sold (i) 100,000 shares of Old National’s Fixed Rate Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock, Series T (the “Series T Preferred Stock”) and (ii) warrants (the “Warrants”) to purchase up to 813,008 shares of Old National’s common stock at an initial per share exercise price of $18.45.

The Series T Preferred Stock qualified as Tier 1 capital and the Treasury Department was entitled to cumulative dividends at a rate of 5% per year for the first five years, and 9% per year thereafter. The Preferred Stock had priority in the payment of dividends over any cash dividends paid to common stockholders. The adoption of ARRA permitted Old National to redeem the Series T Preferred Stock without penalty and without the need to raise new capital, subject to the Treasury’s consultation with Old National’s regulatory agency. The Warrant has a 10-year term and is immediately exercisable upon its issuance. Subsequent to quarter-end, Old National submitted its intent to repurchase the warrant from the Treasury Department.

During the fourth quarter of 2007, we declared a cash dividend of $0.23 per share to be paid in the first quarter of 2008, which was included in the fourth quarter 2007 financial results. We declared cash dividends of $0.23 ~~and $0.46~~ per share for the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30, 2008,~~March 31, 2009, which reduced equity by ~~$30.5~~$15.3 million. We ~~paid cash~~also accrued dividends ~~of $0.22 and $0.66 per share~~on the preferred shares for the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30, 2007,~~March 31, 2009, which ~~decreased~~reduced equity by ~~$43.4~~$1.2 million. We ~~purchased~~repurchased shares of our stock, reducing shareholders’ equity by ~~$0.4~~$0.3 million during the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September 30, 2008,~~March 31, 2009, and ~~$4.1~~$0.2 million during the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September 30, 2007.~~March 31, 2008. The repurchases related to our employee stock based compensation plans. The change in unrealized losses on investment securities ~~decreased~~increased equity by ~~$40.6 million and $0.1~~$4.9 million during the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September 30, 2008,~~March 31, 2009, and ~~2007, respectively.~~$2.4 million during the three months ended March 31, 2008. Shares issued for stock options, restricted stock and stock compensation plans increased shareholders’ equity by ~~$2.9~~$2.3 million during the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September 30, 2008,~~March 31, 2009, compared to ~~$1.1~~$0.9 million during the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September 30, 2007. In addition, $0.5 million of restricted stock and options were issued in connection with the acquisition of St. Joseph in 2007. The adoption of FASB Interpretation No. 48,~~~~Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes — an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109~~~~, resulted in a $3.4 million reduction in equity during the first quarter of 2007. The adoption of EITF 06-5,~~~~Accounting for Purchases of Life Insurance – Determining the Amount That Could Be Realized in Accordance with FASB Technical Bulletin No. 85-4 (Accounting for Purchases of Life Insurance)~~~~, also affected equity in the first quarter of 2007, resulting in a $0.1 million reduction.~~March 31, 2008.

Capital Adequacy

Old National and the banking industry are subject to various regulatory capital requirements administered by the federal banking agencies. At ~~September 30, 2008,~~March 31, 2009, Old National and its bank subsidiary exceeded the regulatory minimums and Old National Bank met the regulatory definition of well-capitalized based on the most recent regulatory definition. To be categorized as well-capitalized,, the bank subsidiary must maintain at least a total risk-based capital ratio of 10.0%, a Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio of 6.0% and a Tier 1 leverage ratio of 5.0%. Regulatory capital ratios have decreased from December 31, 2008 levels primarily due to the repurchase of $100 million of preferred shares from the Treasury Department on March 31, 2009.

We expect conditions in the overall residential real estate and credit markets to remain uncertain for the foreseeable future. Deterioration in the performance of the underlying loan collateral could result in deterioration in the performance of our asset-backed securities.

~~At September 30, 2008,~~With regard to our non-agency collateralized mortgage obligations, we do not believe that any individual unrealized loss represents an other-than-temporary ~~impairment.~~impairment at March 31, 2009. The majority of the unrealized losses on mortgage-backed securities are attributable to both changes in interest rates and financial market stress.

We also carry a higher exposure to loss in our pooled trust preferred securities, which are collateralized debt obligations, due to illiquidity in that market and performance of underlying collateral. At ~~September 30, 2008,~~March 31, 2009, we had pooled trust preferred securities with a fair value of approximately ~~$19.5~~$11.2 million, or 1%0.4% of the available-for-sale securities portfolio. During the quarter, we determined that three of these securities had other-than-temporary-impairment as a result of additional defaults or deferrals during the period. A $2.4 million charge related to the credit loss was realized in earnings during the period. These securities remained classified as available-for-sale and at March 31, 2009 the unrealized loss on our pooled trust preferred securities was approximately $35.3 million.

The majority of the remaining mortgage-backed securities are backed by U.S. government-sponsored or federal agencies. Municipal bonds, corporate bonds and other debt securities are evaluated by reviewing the credit-worthiness of the issuer and general market conditions. We do not have the intent to sell these securities and ~~ability~~it is likely that we will not be required to ~~hold all~~sell these securities ~~in an unrealized loss position at September 30, 2008 until the market value recovers or the securities mature.~~before their anticipated recovery.

Counterparty Exposure

Counterparty exposure is the risk that the other party in a financial transaction will not fulfill its obligation in a financial transaction. We define counterparty exposure as nonperformance risk in transactions involving federal funds sold and purchased, repurchase agreements, correspondent bank relationships, and derivative contracts with companies in the financial services industry. Old National’s net counterparty exposure was a liability of ~~$121.6~~$66.2 million at ~~September 30, 2008.~~March 31, 2009.

Summary of under-performing, criticized and classified ~~loans:~~assets:


	September 30,						December 31,			March 31,						December 31,
(dollars in thousands)	2008			2007			2007			2009			2008			2008
Nonaccrual loans
Commercial and commercial real estate	$	56,266		$	39,403		$	30,303		$	65,801		$	59,915		$	52,394
Residential real estate		6,207			5,621			5,996			5,458			5,890			5,474
Consumer		5,973			4,288			4,517			6,147			4,418			6,173

Total nonaccrual loans		68,446			49,312			40,816			77,406			70,223			64,041
Renegotiated loans		—			—			—			—			—			—
Past due loans (90 days or more and still accruing)
Commercial and commercial real estate		1,074			1,384			738			1,303			958			991
Residential real estate		—			—			—			13			121			—
Consumer		853			789			773			1,119			468			1,917

Total past due loans		1,927			2,173			1,511			2,435			1,547			2,908
Foreclosed properties		3,178			7,931			2,876			6,864			2,320			2,934

Total under-performing assets	$	73,551		$	59,416		$	45,203		$	86,705		$	74,090		$	69,883

Classified loans (includes nonaccrual, renegotiated, past due 90 days and other problem loans)	$	173,833		$	130,247		$	115,121		$	199,750		$	153,732		$	180,118
Other classified assets											96,546			—			34,543
Criticized loans		114,321			79,102			103,210			86,587			103,815			124,855

Total criticized and classified loans	$	288,154		$	209,349		$	218,331
Total criticized and classified assets										$	382,883		$	257,547		$	339,516

Asset Quality Ratios:
Non-performing loans/total loans (1) (2)		1.46	%		1.04	%		0.87	%		1.67	%		1.50	%		1.34	%
Under-performing assets/total loans and foreclosed properties (1)		1.57			1.25			0.96			1.87			1.58			1.46
Under-performing assets/total assets		0.97			0.76			0.58			1.04			0.96			0.89
Allowance for loan losses/under-performing assets		86.29			107.95			124.91			82.78			97.52			96.00

Under-performing assets totaled ~~$73.6~~$86.7 million at ~~September 30, 2008,~~March 31, 2009, an increase of ~~$14.1~~$12.6 million compared to ~~$59.4~~$74.1 million at ~~September 30, 2007,~~March 31, 2008, and an increase of ~~$28.3~~$16.8 million compared to ~~$45.2~~$69.9 million at December 31, ~~2007.~~2008. As a percent of total loans and foreclosed properties, under-performing assets at ~~September 30, 2008,~~March 31, 2009, were ~~1.57%~~1.87%, an increase from the ~~September 30, 2007~~March 31, 2008 ratio of ~~1.25%~~1.58% and an increase from the December 31, ~~2007~~2008 ratio of ~~0.96%~~1.46%. Nonaccrual loans were ~~$68.4~~$77.4 million at ~~September 30, 2008,~~March 31, 2009, compared to ~~$49.3~~$70.2 million at ~~September 30, 2007,~~March 31, 2008, and ~~$40.8~~$64.0 million at December 31, ~~2007.~~2008. Included in nonaccrual loans at ~~September 30, 2008,~~March 31, 2009, is ~~$12.3~~$6.8 million of loans associated with the misconduct of a former loan officer in the Indianapolis market. Management will continue its efforts to reduce the level of under-performing loans and will consider the possibility of sales of troubled and non-performing loans, which could result in additional charge-offs to the allowance for loan losses.

Total classified and criticized ~~loans~~assets were ~~$288.2~~$382.9 million at ~~September 30, 2008,~~March 31, 2009, an increase of ~~$78.8~~$125.3 million from ~~September 30, 2007,~~March 31, 2008, and an increase of ~~$69.8~~$43.4 million from December 31, ~~2007.~~2008. Other classified assets include $96.5 million and $34.5 million of investment securities that fell below investment grade rating at March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively.

Allowance for Loan Losses and Reserve for Unfunded Commitments

To provide for the risk of loss inherent in extending credit, we maintain an allowance for loan losses. The determination of the allowance is based upon the size and current risk characteristics of the loan portfolio and includes an assessment of individual problem loans, actual loss experience, current economic events and regulatory guidance. At ~~September 30, 2008,~~March 31, 2009, the allowance for loan losses was ~~$63.5~~$71.8 million, a decrease of ~~$0.6~~$0.5 million compared to ~~$64.1~~$72.3 million at ~~September 30, 2007,~~March 31, 2008, and an increase of ~~$7.0~~$4.7 million compared to ~~$56.5~~$67.1 million at December 31, ~~2007.~~2008. As a percentage of total loans excluding loans held for sale, the allowance was ~~1.36%~~1.55% at ~~September 30, 2008,~~March 31, 2009, compared to ~~1.35%~~1.54% at ~~September 30, 2007,~~March 31, 2008, and ~~1.20%~~1.41% at December 31, ~~2007.~~2008. The provision for loan losses for the three months ended ~~September 30, 2008,~~March 31, 2009, amounted to ~~$6.8~~$17.3 million compared to ~~no provision~~$21.9 million for the three months ended ~~September 30, 2007.~~March 31, 2008. The ~~provision for the nine months ended September 30, 2008, was $34.4 million compared to $2.4 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2007. The increase~~decrease in the provision year over year is primarily due to the $17.0 million of expense recorded in the first quarter of 2008 associated with the misconduct of a former loan officer in the Indianapolis ~~market, and to a lesser extent, softening in the credit markets related to the current economic environment.~~market.

We maintain an allowance for losses on unfunded commercial lending commitments and letters of credit to provide for the risk of loss inherent in these arrangements. The allowance is computed using a methodology similar to that used to determine the allowance for loan losses, modified to take into account the probability of a drawdown on the commitment. In accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, the $3.7 million reserve for unfunded loan commitments is classified as a liability account on the balance sheet. The reserve for unfunded loan commitments was ~~essentially unchanged when compared to the $3.7~~$3.5 million at December 31, ~~2007.~~2008.

Market Risk

Market risk is the risk of loss arising from adverse changes in the fair value of financial instruments due to changes in interest rates, currency exchange rates, and other relevant market rates or prices. Interest rate risk is our primary market risk and results from timing differences in the re-pricing of assets and liabilities, changes in the slope of the yield curve, and the potential exercise of explicit or embedded options.

We manage interest rate risk within an overall asset and liability management framework that includes attention to credit risk, liquidity risk and capitalization. A principal objective of asset/liability management is to manage the sensitivity of net interest income to changing interest rates. Asset and liability management activity is governed by a policy reviewed and approved annually by the Board of Directors. The Board of Directors has delegated the administration of this policy to the Funds Management Committee, a committee of the Board of Directors, and the Executive Balance Sheet Management Committee, a committee comprised of senior executive management. The Funds Management Committee meets quarterly and oversees adherence to policy and recommends policy changes to the Board. The Executive Balance Sheet Management committee meets quarterly. This committee determines balance sheet management strategies and initiatives for the Company. A group comprised of corporate and line management meets monthly to implement strategies and initiatives determined by the Executive Balance Sheet Management Committee.

We use two modeling techniques to quantify the impact of changing interest rates on the Company, Net Interest Income at Risk and Economic Value of Equity. Net Interest Income at Risk is used by management and the Board of Directors to evaluate the impact of changing rates over a two-year horizon. Economic Value of Equity is used to evaluate long-term interest rate risk. These models simulate the likely behavior of our net interest income and the likely change in our economic value due to changes in interest rates under various possible interest rate scenarios. Because the models are driven by expected behavior in various interest rate scenarios and many factors besides market interest rates affect our net interest income and value, we recognize that model outputs are not guarantees of actual results. For this reason, we model many different combinations of interest rates and balance sheet assumptions to understand its overall sensitivity to market interest rate changes.

3942

At March 31, 2009, modeling indicated that Old National was within the yellow zone policy limit for the Up 200 and Up 300 Economic Value of Equity scenarios. Management has agreed to monitor these scenarios closely. The Up 100 Economic Value of Equity Scenarios fell within the Old National’s green zone policy limit, which is considered normal and acceptable for Economic Value of Equity scenarios.

We use derivatives, primarily interest rate swaps, as one method to manage interest rate risk in the ordinary course of business. Our derivatives had an estimated fair value ~~loss~~gain of ~~$533 thousand~~$1.3 million at ~~September 30, 2008,~~March 31, 2009, compared to an estimated fair value ~~gain~~loss of ~~$20 thousand~~$0.6 million at December 31, ~~2007.~~2008. In addition, the notional amount of derivatives increased by ~~$3.804~~$135.3 million ~~as compared~~from 2008. See Note 15 to ~~December 31, 2007.~~the consolidated financial statements for further discussion of derivative financial instruments.

Liquidity Risk

Liquidity risk arises from the possibility that we may not be able to satisfy current or future financial commitments, or may become unduly reliant on alternative funding sources. The Funds Management Committee of the Board of Directors establishes liquidity risk guidelines and, along with the Balance Sheet Management Committee, monitors liquidity risk. The objective of liquidity management is to ensure we have the ability to fund balance sheet growth and meet deposit and debt obligations in a timely and cost-effective manner. Management monitors liquidity through a regular review of asset and liability maturities, funding sources, and loan and deposit forecasts. We maintain strategic and contingency liquidity plans to ensure sufficient available funding to satisfy requirements for balance sheet growth, properly manage capital markets’ funding sources and to address unexpected liquidity requirements.

Loan repayments and maturing investment securities are a relatively predictable source of funds. However, deposit flows, calls of investment securities and prepayments of loans and mortgage-related securities are strongly influenced by interest rates, the housing market, general and local economic conditions, and competition in the marketplace. We continually monitor marketplace trends to identify patterns that might improve the predictability of the timing of deposit flows or asset prepayments.

Our ability to acquire funding at competitive prices is influenced by rating agencies’ views of our credit quality, liquidity, capital and earnings. All of the rating agencies place us in an investment grade that indicates a low risk of default. Standard and Poor’s ~~Moody’s Investor Service~~ and Dominion Bond Rating Services have each issued a stable outlook in conjunction with their ratings as of ~~September 30,~~December 31, 2008. On October 13, 2008, Moody’s Investor Service changed Old National Bancorp’s outlook to negative, reflecting concern over Old National’s high dividend payments and corresponding impact to holding company liquidity. As of December 12, 2008, Fitch Rating Services ~~continues~~changed their long-term outlook rating from negative to ~~carry a negative outlook in conjunction with their ratings as of September 30, 2008.~~stable for both Old National Bancorp (the “Parent Company”) and Old National Bank (the “Bank Subsidiary”). The senior debt ratings of Old National Bancorp (the “Parent Company”) and Old National Bank (the “Bank Subsidiary”) at ~~September 30, 2008,~~March 31, 2009, are shown in the following table.

SENIOR DEBT RATINGS

��

Standard and Poor’s

Moody’s Investor Service

Fitch, Inc.

Dominion Bond Rating Svc.

Long

Short

Long

Short

Long

Short

Long

Short

term

Old National Bancorp

BBB

N/A

BBB

BBB (high)

R-2 (high)

Old National Bank

BBB+

P-1

BBB+

A (low)

R-1 (low)

N/A = not applicable

As of ~~September 30, 2008,~~March 31, 2009, the Bank Subsidiary had the capacity to borrow ~~$982.7~~$846.3 million from the Federal Reserve Bank’s discount ~~window.~~window and its Term Auction Facility. The Bank Subsidiary is also a member of the Federal Home Loan Bank (“FHLB”) of Indianapolis, which provides a source of funding through FHLB advances. The Bank Subsidiary maintains relationships in capital markets with brokers and dealers to issue certificates of deposits and short-term and medium-term bank notes as well.

Additionally, the Parent Company has a shelf registration in place with the Securities and Exchange Commission permitting ready access to the public debt markets. ~~As of September 30, 2008, $700~~At March 31, 2009, the Parent Company’s other borrowings outstanding remained unchanged at $157.2 million ofcompared with December 31, 2008. There is no Parent Company debt ~~or other securities were available for issuance under this shelf registration.~~

scheduled to mature within the next 12 months. Subsequent to ~~quarter-end,~~the quarter ending March 31, 2009, Old National ~~Bancorp was preliminarily approved~~instituted a $30 million line of credit with no outstanding balance.

Old National agreed to participate in the U.S. Treasury Department ~~of Treasury’s TARP~~ Capital Purchase ~~Program. We applied~~Program for healthy financial institutions during fourth quarter 2008. Under the program, Old National sold preferred, non-voting shares of its stock and ~~received approval for $150~~warrants valued at $100 million to the U.S. Treasury Department. As of March 31, 2009, Old National repurchased all of the $100 million of ~~capital. We have thirty days to determine if we will participate in~~non-voting preferred shares from the ~~program.~~Treasury Department.

Federal banking laws regulate the amount of dividends that may be paid by banking subsidiaries without prior approval. Prior regulatory approval is required if dividends to be declared in any year would exceed net earnings of the current year plus retained net profits for the preceding two years. At December 31, 2006, the Bank Subsidiary had received regulatory approval to declare a dividend up to $76 million in the first quarter of 2007. The Parent Company used the cash obtained from the dividend to fund its purchase of St. Joseph Capital Corporation during the first quarter of 2007. As a result of this special dividend, the Bank Subsidiary requires approval of regulatory authority for the payment of dividends to the Parent ~~Company in 2008.~~Company. Such approval was obtained for the payment of dividends at ~~September 30, 2008.~~March 31, 2009.

OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS

Off-balance sheet arrangements include commitments to extend credit and financial guarantees. Commitments to extend credit and financial guarantees are used to meet the financial needs of our customers. Our banking affiliates have entered into various agreements to extend credit, including loan commitments of ~~$1.118~~$1.137 billion and standby letters of credit of ~~$111.0~~$109.7 million at ~~September 30, 2008.~~March 31, 2009. At ~~September 30, 2008,~~March 31, 2009, approximately ~~$1.056~~$1.073 billion of the loan commitments had fixed rates and ~~$62~~$64 million had floating rates, with the fixed rates ranging from 1% to 21%. At December 31, ~~2007,~~2008, loan commitments were ~~$1.195~~$1.124 billion and standby letters of credit were ~~$114.1~~$108.4 million. The term of these off-balance sheet arrangements is typically one year or less.

During the second quarter of 2007, we entered into a risk participation in an interest rate swap. The interest rate swap ~~has~~had a notional amount of ~~$9.6 million.~~$9.4 million at March 31, 2009.

CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS

The following table presents our significant fixed and determinable contractual obligations at ~~September 30, 2008:~~March 31, 2009:

CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS


	Payments Due In										Payments Due In
	One Year		One to		Three to		Over				One Year		One to		Three to		Over
(dollars in thousands)	or Less (A)		Three Years		Five Years		Five Years		Total		or Less (A)		Three Years		Five Years		Five Years		Total
Deposits without stated maturity	$	3,440,541	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	3,440,541	$	3,738,491	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	3,738,491
IRAs, consumer and brokered certificates of deposit		266,425		1,095,122		238,556		305,577		1,905,680		913,133		848,665		246,389		108,060		2,116,247
Short-term borrowings		541,648		—		—		—		541,648		827,092		—		—		—		827,092
Other borrowings		10		126,083		425,734		285,488		837,315		2,030		374,089		257,093		176,746		809,958
Operating leases		7,298		55,710		52,633		334,630		450,271		24,073		62,071		58,649		319,055		463,848

In addition, liabilities recorded under FASB Interpretation No. 48,Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes — an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109(“FIN 48”) are not included in the table because the amount and timing of any cash payments cannot be reasonably estimated. Further discussion of income taxes and liabilities recorded under FIN 48 is included in Note 14 to the consolidated financial statements.

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES

Our accounting policies are described in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, ~~2007.~~2008. Certain accounting policies require management to use significant judgment and estimates, which can have a material impact on the carrying value of certain assets and liabilities. We consider these policies to be critical accounting policies. The judgment and assumptions made are based upon historical experience or other factors that management believes to be reasonable under the circumstances. Because of the nature of the judgment and assumptions, actual results could differ from these judgments and estimates which could have a material affect on our financial condition and results of operations.

The following accounting policies materially affect our reported earnings and financial condition and require significant judgments and estimates. Management has reviewed these critical accounting estimates and related disclosures with the Audit Committee of our Board.

Goodwill and Intangibles

	•		Description.For acquisitions, we are required to record the assets acquired, including identified intangible assets, and the liabilities assumed at their fair value. These often involve estimates based on third-party valuations, such as appraisals, or internal valuations based on discounted cash flow analyses or other valuation techniques that may include estimates of attrition, inflation, asset growth rates or other relevant factors. In addition, the determination of the useful lives ~~for~~over which an intangible asset will be amortized is subjective. Under Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 142Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, goodwill and indefinite-lived assets recorded must be reviewed for impairment on an annual basis, as well as on an interim basis if events or changes indicate that the asset might be impaired. An impairment loss must be recognized for any excess of carrying value over fair value of the goodwill or the indefinite-lived intangible asset.

	•		Judgments and Uncertainties.The determination of fair values is based on internal valuations using management’s assumptions of future growth rates, future attrition, discount rates, multiples of earnings or other relevant factors.

	•		Effect if Actual Results Differ From Assumptions.Changes in these factors, as well as downturns in economic or business conditions, could have a significant adverse impact on the carrying values of goodwill or intangible assets and could result in impairment losses affecting the financials of the Company as a whole and the individual lines of business in which the goodwill or intangibles reside.

Allowance for Loan Losses

Description.The allowance for loan losses is maintained at a level believed adequate by management to absorb probable incurred losses in the consolidated loan portfolio. Management’s evaluation of the adequacy of the allowance is an estimate based on reviews of individual loans, pools of homogeneous loans, assessments of the impact of current and anticipated economic conditions on the portfolio and historical loss experience. The allowance represents management’s best estimate, but significant downturns in circumstances relating to loan quality and economic conditions could result in a requirement for additional allowance. Likewise, an upturn in loan quality and improved economic conditions may allow a reduction in the required allowance. In either instance, unanticipated changes could have a significant impact on results of operations.

4346

			The allowance is increased through a provision charged to operating expense. Uncollectible loans are charged-off through the allowance. Recoveries of loans previously charged-off are added to the allowance. A loan is considered impaired when it is probable that contractual interest and principal payments will not be collected either for the amounts or by the dates as scheduled in the loan agreement. Our policy for recognizing income on impaired loans is to accrue interest unless a loan is placed on nonaccrual status. A loan is generally placed on nonaccrual status when principal or interest becomes 90 days past due unless it is well secured and in the process of collection, or earlier when concern exists as to the ultimate collectibility of principal or interest. We monitor the quality of our loan portfolio on an on-going basis and use a combination of detailed credit assessments by relationship managers and credit officers, historic loss trends, and economic and business environment factors in determining the allowance for loan losses. We record provisions for loan losses based on current loans outstanding, grade changes, mix of loans and expected losses. A detailed loan loss evaluation on an individual loan basis for our highest risk loans is performed quarterly. Management follows the progress of the economy and how it might affect our borrowers in both the near and the intermediate term. We have a formalized and disciplined independent loan review program to evaluate loan administration, credit quality and compliance with corporate loan standards. This program includes periodic reviews and regular reviews of problem loan reports, delinquencies and charge-offs.

	•		Judgments and Uncertainties.We use migration analysis as a tool to determine the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses for non-retail loans that are not impaired. Migration analysis is a statistical technique that attempts to estimate probable losses for existing pools of loans by matching actual losses incurred on loans back to their origination.

			We calculate migration analysis using several different scenarios based on varying assumptions to evaluate the widest range of possible outcomes. The migration-derived historical commercial loan loss rates are applied to the current commercial loan pools to arrive at an estimate of probable losses for the loans existing at the time of analysis. The amounts determined by migration analysis are adjusted for management’s best estimate of the effects of current economic conditions, loan quality trends, results from internal and external review examinations, loan volume trends, credit concentrations and various other factors. Historic loss ratios adjusted for expectations of future economic conditions are used in determining the appropriate level of allowance for consumer and residential real estate loans.

	•		Effect if Actual Results Differ From Assumptions.The allowance represents management’s best estimate, but significant downturns in circumstances relating to loan quality and economic conditions could result in a requirement for additional allowance. Likewise, an upturn in loan quality and improved economic conditions may allow a reduction in the required allowance. In either instance, unanticipated changes could have a significant impact on results of operations.

			Management’s analysis of probable losses in the portfolio at ~~September 30, 2008,~~March 31, 2009, resulted in a range for allowance for loan losses of ~~$10.1~~$10.7 million with the potential effect to net income ranging from a decrease of ~~$1.1~~$1.4 million to an increase of ~~$5.4~~$5.6 million. These sensitivities are hypothetical and are not intended to represent actual results.

Derivative Financial Instruments

Description.As part of our overall interest rate risk management, we use derivative instruments to reduce exposure to changes in interest rates and market prices for financial instruments. The application of the hedge accounting policy requires judgment in the assessment of hedge effectiveness, identification of similar hedged item groupings and measurement of changes in the fair value of derivative financial instruments and hedged items. To the extent hedging relationships are found to be effective, as determined by SFAS No. 133 Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, changes in fair value of the derivatives are offset by changes in the fair value of the related hedged item or recorded to other comprehensive income. Management believes hedge effectiveness is evaluated properly in preparation of the financial statements. All of the derivative financial instruments we use have an active market and indications of fair value can be readily obtained. We are not using the “short-cut” method of accounting for any fair value derivatives.

~~Judgments and Uncertainties.~~The application of the hedge accounting policy requires judgment in the assessment of hedge effectiveness, identification of similar hedged item groupings and measurement of changes in the fair value of derivative financial instruments and hedged items.

4447

	•		Judgments and Uncertainties.The application of the hedge accounting policy requires judgment in the assessment of hedge effectiveness, identification of similar hedged item groupings and measurement of changes in the fair value of derivative financial instruments and hedged items.

	•		Effect if Actual Results Differ From Assumptions.To the extent hedging relationships are found to be effective, as determined by SFAS No. 133 Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, changes in fair value of the derivatives are offset by changes in the fair value of the related hedged item or recorded to other comprehensive income. However, if in the future the derivative financial instruments used by us no longer qualify for hedge accounting treatment, all changes in fair value of the derivative would flow through the consolidated statements of income in other noninterest income, resulting in greater volatility in our earnings.

~~Effect if Actual Results Differ From Assumptions.~~To the extent hedging relationships are found to be effective, as determined by SFAS No. 133 Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, changes in fair value of the derivatives are offset by changes in the fair value of the related hedged item or recorded to other comprehensive income. However, if in the future the derivative financial instruments used by us no longer qualify for hedge accounting treatment, all changes in fair value of the derivative would flow through the consolidated statements of income in other noninterest income, resulting in greater volatility in our earnings.

Income Taxes

	•		Description.We are subject to the income tax laws of the U.S., its states and the municipalities in which we operate. These tax laws are complex and subject to different interpretations by the taxpayer and the relevant government taxing authorities. We review income tax expense and the carrying value of deferred tax assets quarterly; and as new information becomes available, the balances are adjusted as appropriate. On January 1, 2007, we adopted FIN 48 to account for uncertain tax positions. FIN 48 prescribes a recognition threshold of more-likely-than-not, and a measurement attribute for all tax positions taken or expected to be taken on a tax return, in order for those tax positions to be recognized in the financial statements. See Note 1412 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for a further description of our provision and related income tax assets and liabilities.

	•		Judgments and Uncertainties.In establishing a provision for income tax expense, we must make judgments and interpretations about the application of these inherently complex tax laws. We must also make estimates about when in the future certain items will affect taxable income in the various tax jurisdictions. Disputes over interpretations of the tax laws may be subject to review/adjudication by the court systems of the various tax jurisdictions or may be settled with the taxing authority upon examination or audit.

	•		Effect if Actual Results Differ From Assumptions.Although management believes that the judgments and estimates used are reasonable, actual results could differ and we may be exposed to losses or gains that could be material. To the extent we prevail in matters for which reserves have been established, or are required to pay amounts in excess of our reserves, our effective income tax rate in a given financial statement period could be materially affected. An unfavorable tax settlement would result in an increase in our effective income tax rate in the period of resolution. A favorable tax settlement would result in a reduction in our effective income tax rate in the period of resolution.

Valuation of Securities

	•		Description.The fair value of our securities is determined with reference to price estimates. In the absence of observable market inputs related to items such as cash flow assumptions or adjustments to market rates, management judgment is used. Different judgments and assumptions used in pricing could result in different estimates of value.

			When the fair value of a security is less than its amortized cost for an extended period, we consider whether there is an other than temporary impairment in the value of the security. If, in management’s judgment, an ~~other than temporary impairment~~other-than-temporary-impairment exists, the ~~cost basis~~portion of the ~~security is written down~~loss in value attributable to ~~the then-current fair value, and the unrealized loss~~credit quality is transferred from accumulated other comprehensive loss as an immediate reduction of current earnings ~~(as if~~and the ~~loss had been realized in~~cost basis of the ~~period of other than temporary impairment).~~security is written down by this amount.

			We consider the following factors when determining an ~~other than temporary impairment~~other-than-temporary-impairment for a security or investment:

	•		The length of time and the extent to which the market value has been less than amortized cost;

	•		The financial condition and near-term prospects of the issuer;

			Quarterly, securities are evaluated for ~~other than temporary impairment~~other-than-temporary-impairment in accordance with SFAS No. 115,Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities, and Emerging Issues Task Force No. 99-20,Recognition of Interest Income and Impairment on Purchased and Retained Beneficial Interest in Securitized Financial Assetsand FSP No. FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2,Recognition and Presentation of Other-Than-Temporary Impairments. An impairment that is an ~~“other than temporary impairment”~~“other-than-temporary-impairment” is a decline in the fair value of an investment below its amortized cost attributable to factors that indicate the decline will not be recovered over the anticipated holding period of the investment. ~~Other than temporary impairments~~Other-than-temporary-impairments result in reducing the security’s carrying value ~~to its fair value~~by the amount of credit loss. The credit component of the other-than-temporary-impairment loss is realized through the statement of income ~~which also creates a new carrying value for~~and the ~~investment and a revised yield.~~remainder of the loss remains in other comprehensive income.

	•		Judgments and Uncertainties. The determination of ~~other than temporary impairment~~other-than-temporary-impairment is a subjective process, and different judgments and assumptions could affect the timing of the loss realization. In addition, significant judgments are required in determining valuation and impairment, which include making assumptions regarding the estimated prepayments, loss assumptions and the change in interest rates.

	•		Effect if Actual Results Differ From Assumptions.An impairment that is an “other than temporary impairment” is a decline in the fair value of an investment below its amortized cost attributable to factors that indicate the decline will not be recovered over the anticipated holding period of the investment. ~~Other than temporary impairments result in reducing~~The credit component of the other-than-temporary-impairment reduces the security’s carrying value, ~~to its fair value through the statement of income, which also creates a new carrying value for the investment and~~resulting in a revised yield.

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

In this report, we have made various statements regarding current expectations or forecasts of future events, which speak only as of the date the statements are made. These statements are “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward-looking statements are also made from time-to-time in press releases and in oral statements made by the officers of Old National. Forward-looking statements are identified by the words “expect,” “may,” “could,” “intend,” “project,” “estimate,” “believe”, “anticipate” and similar expressions. Forward-looking statements also include, but are not limited to, statements regarding estimated cost savings, plans and objectives for future operations, and expectations about performance as well as economic and market conditions and trends.

Such forward-looking statements are based on assumptions and estimates, which although believed to be reasonable, may turn out to be incorrect. Therefore, undue reliance should not be placed upon these estimates and statements. We can not assure that any of these statements, estimates, or beliefs will be realized and actual results may differ from those contemplated in these “forward-looking statements.” We undertake no obligation to publicly update any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events, or otherwise. You are advised to consult further disclosures we may make on related subjects in our filings with the SEC. In addition to other factors discussed in this report, some of the important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those discussed in the forward-looking statements include the following:

•		economic, market, operational, liquidity, credit and interest rate risks associated with our business;

•		economic conditions generally and in the financial services industry;

•		increased competition in the financial services industry either nationally or regionally, resulting in, among other things, credit quality deterioration;

•		our ability to achieve loan and deposit growth;

•		volatility and direction of market interest rates;

•		governmental legislation and regulation, including changes in accounting regulation or standards;

ITEM 3. QUANTITIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

See Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations-Market Risk and Liquidity Risk.

ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Conclusion Regarding the Effectiveness of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

~~Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures~~Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures.. Old National’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer have concluded that Old National’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended), based on their evaluation of these controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this Form 10-Q, are effective at the reasonable assurance level as discussed below to ensure that information required to be disclosed by Old National in the reports it files under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the rules and forms of the Securities and Exchange Commission and that such information is accumulated and communicated to Old National’s management, including its principal executive officer and principal financial officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

Limitations on the Effectiveness of ~~Controls~~Controls.. Management, including the principal executive officer and principal financial officer, does not expect that Old National’s disclosure controls and internal controls will prevent all error and all fraud. A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within the Company have been detected. These inherent limitations include the realities that judgements in decision-making can be faulty, and that breakdowns can occur because of a simple error or mistake. Additionally, controls can be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people or by management override of the controls.

The design of any system of controls also is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be only reasonable assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions. Over time, control may become inadequate because of changes in conditions or the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. Because of the inherent limitations in a cost-effective control system, misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial ~~Reporting~~Reporting.. There were no changes in Old National’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by this report that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, Old National’s internal control over financial reporting.

4750

PART IIII. OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS

Old National’s business could be harmed by any of the risks noted below. In analyzing whether to make or to continue an investment in Old National, investors should consider, among other factors, the following:

Risks Related to Old National’s Business

The current banking crisis, including the Enactment of the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008 (“EESA”) and the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (“ARRA”), may significantly affect our financial condition, results of operations, liquidity or stock price.

EESA, which established the Troubled Asset Relief Program (“TARP”), was signed into law in October 2008. As part of TARP, the Treasury established the Capital Purchase Program (“CPP”) to provide up to $700 billion of funding to eligible financial institutions through the purchase of capital stock and other financial instruments for the purpose of stabilizing and providing liquidity to the U.S. financial markets. Then, on February 17, 2009, President Obama signed ARRA, as a sweeping economic recovery package intended to stimulate the economy and provide for broad infrastructure, energy, health, and education needs. There can be no assurance as to the actual impact that EESA or its programs, including the CPP, and ARRA or its programs, will have on the national economy or financial markets. The failure of these significant legislative measures to help stabilize the financial markets and a continuation or worsening of current financial market conditions could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations, access to credit or the trading price of our common shares.

There have been numerous actions undertaken in connection with or following EESA and ARRA by the Federal Reserve Board, Congress, the Treasury, the FDIC, the SEC and others in efforts to address the current liquidity and credit crisis in the financial industry that followed the sub-prime mortgage market meltdown which began in 2007. These measures include homeowner relief that encourages loan restructuring and modification; the establishment of significant liquidity and credit facilities for financial institutions and investment banks; the lowering of the federal funds rate; emergency action against short selling practices; a temporary guaranty program for money market funds; the establishment of a commercial paper funding facility to provide back-stop liquidity to commercial paper issuers; and coordinated international efforts to address illiquidity and other weaknesses in the banking sector. The purpose of these legislative and regulatory actions is to help stabilize the U.S. banking system. EESA, ARRA and the other regulatory initiatives described above may not have their desired effects. If the volatility in the markets continues and economic conditions fail to improve or worsen, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected.

If Old National’s actual loan losses exceed Old National’s allowance for loan losses, Old National’s net income will decrease.

Old National makes various assumptions and judgments about the collectibility of Old National’s loan portfolio, including the creditworthiness of Old National’s borrowers and the value of the real estate and other assets serving as collateral for the repayment of Old National’s loans. Despite Old National’s underwriting and monitoring practices, the effect of the declining economy could negatively impact the ability of Old National’s borrowers to repay loans in a timely manner and could also negatively impact collateral values. As a result, Old National may experience significant loan losses that could have a material adverse effect on Old National’s operating results. Since Old National must use assumptions regarding individual loans and the economy, Old National’s current allowance for loan losses may not be sufficient to cover actual loan losses. Old National’s assumptions may not anticipate the severity or duration of the current credit cycle and Old National may need to significantly increase Old National’s provision for losses on loans if one or more of Old National’s larger loans or credit relationships becomes delinquent or if Old National expands its commercial real estate and commercial lending. In addition, federal and state regulators periodically review Old National’s allowance for loan losses and may require Old National to increase the provision for loan losses or recognize loan charge-offs. Material additions to Old National’s allowance would materially decrease Old National’s net income. There can be no ~~material changes~~assurance that Old National’s monitoring procedures and policies will reduce certain lending risks or that Old National’s allowance for loan losses will be adequate to cover actual losses.

Old National’s loan portfolio includes loans with a higher risk of loss.

The Bank originates commercial real estate loans, commercial loans, agricultural real estate loans, agricultural loans, consumer loans, and residential real estate loans primarily within Old National’s market areas. Commercial real estate, commercial, consumer, and agricultural loans may expose a lender to greater credit risk than loans secured by residential real estate because the collateral securing these loans may not be sold as easily as residential real estate. These loans also have greater credit risk than residential real estate for the following reasons:

•

Commercial Real Estate Loans.Repayment is dependent upon income being generated in amounts sufficient to cover operating expenses and debt service.

•

Commercial Loans.Repayment is dependent upon the successful operation of the borrower’s business.

•

Consumer Loans.Consumer loans (such as personal lines of credit) are collateralized, if at all, with assets that may not provide an adequate source of payment of the loan due to depreciation, damage, or loss.

•

Agricultural Loans.Repayment is dependent upon the successful operation of the business, which is greatly dependent on many things outside the control of either the Bank or the borrowers. These factors include weather, commodity prices, and interest rates.

Credit quality issues may broaden in these sectors during 2009 depending on the severity and duration of the declining economy and current credit cycle.

If Old National forecloses on collateral property, Old National may be subject to the increased costs associated with the ownership of real property, resulting in reduced revenues.

Old National may have to foreclose on collateral property to protect Old National’s investment and may thereafter own and operate such property, in which case Old National will be exposed to the risks inherent in the ownership of real estate. The amount that Old National, as a mortgagee, may realize after a default is dependent upon factors outside of Old National’s control, including, but not limited to: (i) general or local economic conditions; (ii) neighborhood values; (iii) interest rates; (iv) real estate tax rates; (v) operating expenses of the mortgaged properties; (vi) environmental remediation liabilities; (vii) ability to obtain and maintain adequate occupancy of the properties; (viii) zoning laws; (ix) governmental rules, regulations and fiscal policies; and (x) acts of God. Certain expenditures associated with the ownership of real estate, principally real estate taxes, insurance, and maintenance costs, may adversely affect the income from the ~~risk factors previously disclosed~~real estate. Therefore, the cost of operating real property may exceed the income earned from such property, and Old National may have to advance funds in order to protect Old National’s investment, or Old National may be required to dispose of the real property at a loss. The foregoing expenditures and costs could adversely affect Old National’s ability to generate revenues, resulting in reduced levels of profitability.

We face risks with respect to future expansion.

We may acquire other financial institutions or parts of those institutions in the ~~“Risk Factors” section~~future, and we may engage in de novo branch expansion. We may also consider and enter into new lines of business or offer new products or services. Acquisitions and mergers involve a number of expenses and risks, including:

the time and costs associated with identifying potential new markets, as well as acquisition and merger targets;

the estimates and judgments used to evaluate credit, operations, management and market risks with respect to the target institution may not be accurate;

the time and costs of evaluating new markets, hiring experienced local management and opening new offices, and the time lags between these activities and the generation of sufficient assets and deposits to support the costs of the expansion;

our ability to finance an acquisition and possible dilution to our existing shareholders;

the diversion of our management’s attention to the negotiation of a transaction, and the integration of the operations and personnel of the combined businesses;

entry into new markets where we lack experience;

the introduction of new products and services into our business;

the incurrence and possible impairment of goodwill associated with an acquisition and possible adverse short-term effects on our results of operations; and

the risk of loss of key employees and customers.

We may incur substantial costs to expand, and we can give no assurance such expansion will result in the levels of profits we seek. There can be no assurance integration efforts for any future mergers or acquisitions will be successful. Also, we may issue equity securities in connection with future acquisitions, which could cause ownership and economic dilution to our current shareholders. There is no assurance that, following any future mergers or acquisitions, our integration efforts will be successful or that, after giving effect to the acquisition, we will achieve profits comparable to or better than our historical experience.

Old National operates in an extremely competitive market, and Old National’s business will suffer if Old National is unable to compete effectively.

In Old National’s market area, the Company encounters significant competition from other commercial banks, savings and loan associations, credit unions, mortgage banking firms, consumer finance companies securities brokerage firms, insurance companies, money market mutual funds and other financial intermediaries. The Company’s ~~annual report~~competitors may have substantially greater resources and lending limits than Old National does and may offer services that Old National does not or cannot provide. Old National’s profitability depends upon Old National’s continued ability to compete successfully in Old National’s market area.

The loss of key members of Old National’s senior management team could adversely affect Old National’s business.

Old National believes that Old National’s success depends largely on ~~Form 10-K~~the efforts and abilities of Old National’s senior management. Their experience and industry contacts significantly benefit Old National. The competition for qualified personnel in the financial services industry is intense, and the loss of any of Old National’s key personnel or an inability to continue to attract, retain and motivate key personnel could adversely affect Old National’s business.

A breach of information security or compliance breach by one of our agents or vendors could negatively affect Old National’s reputation and business.

Old National relies upon a variety of computing platforms and networks over the internet for the ~~year ended December 31, 2007.~~purposes of data processing, communication and information exchange. Despite the safeguards instituted by Old National, such systems are susceptible to a breach of security. In addition, Old National relies on the services of a variety of third-party vendors to meet Old National’s data processing and communication needs. If confidential information is compromised, financial losses, costs and/or other damages could occur. Such costs and/or losses could materially affect Old National’s earnings.

Fiduciary Activity Risk Factor

Old National Is Subject To Claims and Litigation Pertaining To Fiduciary Responsibility.

From time to time, customers make claims and take legal action pertaining to Old National’s performance of its fiduciary responsibilities. If such claims and legal actions are not resolved in a manner favorable to Old National they may result in significant financial liability and/or adversely affect the market perception of Old National and its products and services as well as impact customer demand for those products and services. Any financial liability or reputation damage could have a material adverse effect on the Old National’s business, which, in turn, could have a material adverse effect on the Old National’s financial condition and results of operations.

Risks Related to the Banking Industry

Changes in economic or political conditions could adversely affect Old National’s earnings, as Old National’s borrowers’ ability to repay loans and the value of the collateral securing Old National’s loans decline.

Old National’s success depends, to a certain extent, upon economic or political conditions, local and national, as well as governmental monetary policies. Conditions such as the on-going recession, unemployment, changes in interest rates, inflation, money supply and other factors beyond Old National’s control may adversely affect its asset quality, deposit levels and loan demand and, therefore, the Old National’s earnings. Because Old National has a significant amount of commercial real estate loans, decreases in real estate values could adversely affect the value of property used as collateral. Adverse changes in the economy may also have a negative effect on the ability of Old National’s borrowers to make timely repayments of their loans, which would have an adverse impact on Old National’s earnings. In addition, substantially all of Old National’s loans are to individuals and businesses in Old National’s market area. Consequently, any economic decline in Old National’s primary market areas which include Indiana, Kentucky and Illinois could have an adverse impact on Old National’s earnings.

Current levels of market volatility are unprecedented.

The capital and credit markets have been experiencing volatility and disruption for more than a year. In recent months, the volatility and disruption has reached unprecedented levels. In some cases, the markets have produced downward pressure on stock prices and credit availability for certain issuers seemingly without regard to those issuers’ underlying financial strength. The current market volatility could contribute to a further decline in the market value of certain security investments and other assets of Old National and if current levels of market disruption and volatility continue or worsen, there can be no assurance that we will not experience an adverse effect, which may be material, on results of operations, capital or financial position.

Changes in interest rates could adversely affect Old National’s results of operations and financial condition.

Old National’s earnings depend substantially on Old National’s interest rate spread, which is the difference between (i) the rates Old National earns on loans, securities and other earning assets and (ii) the interest rates Old National pays on deposits and other borrowings. These rates are highly sensitive to many factors beyond Old National’s control, including general economic conditions and the policies of various governmental and regulatory authorities. If market interest rates rise, Old National will have competitive pressures to increase the rates Old National pays on deposits, which could result in a decrease of Old National’s net interest income. If market interest rates decline, Old National could experience fixed rate loan prepayments and higher investment portfolio cash flows, resulting in a lower yield on earnings assets.

Old National operates in a highly regulated environment, and changes in laws and regulations to which Old National is subject may adversely affect Old National’s results of operations.

Old National operates in a highly regulated environment and is subject to extensive regulation, supervision and examination by the Office of Comptroller of the Currency (“OCC”), the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”), the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (the “Federal Reserve”) and the State of Indiana. Applicable laws and regulations may change, and such changes may adversely affect Old National’s business. Such regulation and supervision of the activities in which an institution may engage is primarily intended for the protection of the depositors and federal deposit insurance funds. Regulatory authorities have extensive discretion in connection with their supervisory and enforcement activities, including but not limited to the imposition of restrictions on the operation of an institution, the classification of assets by the institution and the adequacy of an institution’s allowance for loan losses. Any change in such regulation and oversight, whether in the form of restrictions on activities, regulatory policy, regulations, or legislation, including but not limited to changes in the regulations governing institutions, could have a material impact on Old National and its operations.

Changes in technology could be costly.

The banking industry is undergoing technological innovation at a fast pace. To keep up with its competition, Old National needs to stay abreast of innovations and evaluate those technologies that will enable it to compete on a cost-effective basis. The cost of such technology, including personnel, can be high in both absolute and relative terms. There can be no assurance, given the fast pace of change and innovation, that Old National’s technology, either purchased or developed internally, will meet or continue to meet the needs of Old National.

Our earnings could be adversely impacted by incidences of fraud and compliance failures that are not within our direct control.

We are subject to fraud and compliance risk in connection with the origination of loans. Fraud risk includes the intentional misstatement of information in property appraisals or other underwriting documentation provided to us by third parties. Compliance risk is the risk that loans are not originated in compliance with applicable laws and regulations and our standards. There can be no assurance that we can prevent or detect acts of fraud or violation of law or our compliance standards by the third parties that we deal with. Repeated incidences of fraud or compliance failures adversely impact the performance of our loan portfolio.

Risks Related to Old National’s Stock

We may not be able to pay dividends in the future in accordance with past practice.

Old National has traditionally paid a quarterly dividend to common stockholders. The payment of dividends is subject to legal and regulatory restrictions. Any payment of dividends in the future will depend, in large part, on Old National’s earnings, capital requirements, financial condition and other factors considered relevant by Old National’s Board of Directors.

The price of Old National’s common stock may be volatile, which may result in losses for investors.

General market price declines or market volatility in the future could adversely affect the price of Old National’s common stock. In addition, the following factors may cause the market price for shares of Old National’s common stock to fluctuate:

	•		announcements of developments related to Old National’s business;

	•		fluctuations in Old National’s results of operations;

	•		sales or purchases of substantial amounts of Old National’s securities in the marketplace;

	•		general conditions in Old National’s banking niche or the worldwide economy;

	•		a shortfall or excess in revenues or earnings compared to securities analysts’ expectations;

	•		changes in analysts’ recommendations or projections; and

	•		Old National’s announcement of new acquisitions or other projects.

Old National’s charter documents and federal regulations may inhibit a takeover, prevent a transaction that may favor or otherwise limit Old National’s growth opportunities, which could cause the market price of Old National’s common stock to decline.

Certain provisions of Old National’s charter documents and federal regulations could have the effect of making it more difficult for a third party to acquire, or of discouraging a third party from attempting to acquire, control of Old National. In addition, Old National must obtain approval from regulatory authorities before acquiring control of any other company.

ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS

(c)ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

Total Number
of Shares
Total Average Purchased as Maximum Number of
Number Price Part of Publically Shares that May Yet
of Shares Paid Per Announced Plans Be Purchased Under
Period Purchased Share or Programs the Plans or Programs

07/01/08 - 07/31/08 3,370 $ 15.28 3,370 4,300,053
08/01/08 - 08/31/08 — — — 4,300,053
09/01/08 - 09/30/08 2,199 19.94 2,199 4,297,854

Quarter-to-date 09/30/08 5,569 $ 17.12 5,569 4,297,854


					Total Number
					of Shares
	Total		Average		Purchased as		Maximum Number of
	Number		Price		Part of Publically		Shares that May Yet
	of Shares		Paid Per		Announced Plans		Be Purchased Under
Period	Purchased		Share		or Programs		the Plans or Programs

01/01/09 - 01/31/09		—	$	—		—		—
02/01/09 - 02/29/09		27,326		12.70		27,326		—
03/01/09 - 03/31/09		—		—		—		—

Quarter-to-date 03/31/09		27,326	$	12.70		27,326		—

The Company’s stock repurchase program ended on December 31, 2008. Shares repurchased in the first quarter of 2009 relate to our employee compensation plans.

ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION

(a)

~~None~~On January 29, 2009, the Board of Directors of Old National Bancorp (the “Company”), upon recommendation of the Compensation and Management Development Committee of the Board (the “Compensation Committee”) took several actions with respect to incentive compensation for the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and other executive officers named in the compensation discussion included in the Company’s proxy statement for its annual meeting held in 2008 (collectively, the “Named Executive Officers”) and other executive officers. The actions taken include the establishment of performance goals and potential awards for fiscal year 2009 under the Company’s Short-Term Incentive Compensation Plan for Key Executives, and the grant of long-term incentive awards under the Company’s 2008 Incentive Compensation Plan in the form of performance shares, service-based restricted stock and non-qualified stock options.

Short-Term Incentive Compensation Plan

On January 29, 2009, the Board of Directors of the Company, upon recommendation of the Compensation Committee, established the performance goals and potential awards for the Named Executive Officers with respect to fiscal year 2009 under the Company’s Short-Term Incentive Compensation Plan for Key Executives (“STIP”). For 2009, the incentive bonus paid under the STIP will be based on the level of achievement of the Company’s earnings per share. Target awards for executive officers range from 40% to 75% of base salary, and maximum awards range from 80% to 150% of base salary.

Long-Term Incentive Awards

On January 29, 2009, the Board of Directors of the Company, upon recommendation of the Compensation Committee, approved the grant of performance shares, service-based restricted stock awards and non-qualified stock options to each of the Named Executive Officers pursuant to the Company’s 2008 Incentive Compensation Plan.

There were two categories of performance shares granted to Named Executive Officers. The first set of performance shares, measured by internal performance measures, are payable to the Named Executive Officers based on the collective results of the following three performance factors from January 1, 2009 through December 31, 2011 (the “Performance Period”): Earnings Per Share Growth; Total Revenue Growth; and Net Charge-Off Ratio. The other category of performance shares, measured by relative performance measures, will be payable to the Named Executive Officers based on the collective results of the following four relative performance factors during the Performance Period as measured against a comparator “Peer” group: EPS Diluted - Excluding Extraordinary Items Growth (as defined below), Total Revenue Growth, Net Charge-Off Ratio and Total Shareholder Return. EPS Diluted — Excluding Extraordinary Items represents earnings per share after allowing for the conversion of convertible senior stock and debt, and the exercise of warrants, options outstanding, and agreements for issuance of common shares upon satisfaction of certain conditions. EPS Diluted — Excluding Extraordinary Items is calculated in accordance with Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 15 and excludes extraordinary items and discontinued operations. For the performance shares that are based on internal performance measures, Total Revenue Growth is defined as the sum of fully taxable-equivalent net interest income and total non-interest income recognized in a period after the quarter ending December 31, 2008. For the performance shares that are based on relative performance measures, Total Revenue Growth is defined as the compound annual growth rate of increase of the sum of net interest income and non-interest income (as reflected in year-end financial statements), disregarding, however, extraordinary items, as determined by GAAP, from December 31, 2008, through December 31, 2011.

The value of the performance shares that is presented in the table below is the value that will be earned if the Company achieves the targeted levels. If the Company performs in relation to the financial factors at levels that exceed the targeted levels, the value of the performance shares presented in the table below could be greater than that presented, but not more than 200% of such amounts.

The service-based restricted stock awards were granted to the Named Executive Officers, with the exception of the Chief Executive Officer. These awards will vest annually in three approximately equal installments (33.3%, 33.3%, 33.4%) over a three-year period ending February 1, 2012, subject to the continued employment of the Named Executive Officer.

The non-qualified stock options were granted at an exercise price of $13.31 (the closing price of the Company’s common stock on the date of the grant) and will vest annually in three approximately equal installments (33.3%, 33.3%, 33.4%) over a three-year period ending February 1, 2012.

The following table set forth information regarding the individual grants of restricted stock and stock options for each of the Named Executive Officers:


	Value of		Value of		Number of
	Performance-		Service-Based		Stock
Named Executive Officer	Shares (1) (2)		Restricted Stock (1)		Options
Robert G. Jones	$	409,948				49,000
Barbara A. Murphy	$	62,557	$	62,557		15,000
Christopher A. Wolking	$	62,557	$	62,557		15,000
Annette W. Hudgions	$	29,282	$	29,282		7,000
Daryl D. Moore	$	38,599	$	38,599		9,000


(1)		Based on the closing price of the Company’s stock on the date of grant $13.31.

(2)		As discussed above, the values of performance shares are presented assuming the Company achieves targeted levels of financial performance established by the awards; if the Company performs better than established by the targeted measures, then additional shares could be issued under such awards, but not more than 200% of the values set forth above.

(b)

There have been no material changes in the procedure by which security holders recommend nominees to the Company’s board of directors.

ITEM 6. EXHIBITS


Exhibit No.		Description
	~~3.1~~2.1	~~Articles of Incorporation of~~Purchase and Assumption Agreement dated November 24, 2008 by and among Old National ~~amended May 22, 2007~~Bancorp, Old National Bank and RBS Citizens, National Association (incorporated by reference to Exhibit ~~3.1~~2.1 of Old National’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on ~~May 22, 2007)~~November 25, 2008).

	3.1	Articles of Incorporation of Old National, amended December 10, 2008 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of Old National’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008).

	3.2	By-Laws of Old National, amended April 26, 2007 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of Old National’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 30, 2007).

	4.1	Senior Indenture between Old National and The Bank of New York Trust Company (as successor to J.P. Morgan Trust Company, National Association (as successor to Bank One, NA)), as trustee, dated as of July 23, 1997 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to Old National’s Registration Statement on Form S-3, Registration No. 333-118374, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 2, 2004).

	4.2	Form of Indenture between Old National and J.P. Morgan Trust Company, National Association (as successor to Bank One, NA), as trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Old National’s Registration Statement on Form S-3, Registration No. 333-87573, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 22, 1999).

	4.3	Rights Agreement, dated March 1, 1990, as amended on February 29, 2000, between Old National Bancorp and Old National Bank, as trustee (incorporated by reference to Old National’s Form 8-A, dated March 1, 2000).


~~Exhibit No.~~		~~Description~~
	4.4	First Indenture Supplement dated as of May 20, 2005, between Old National and J.P. Morgan Trust Company, as trustee, providing for the issuance of its 5.00% Senior Notes due 2010 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of Old National’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 20, 2005).

	4.5	Form of 5.00% Senior Notes due 2010 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 of Old National’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 20, 2005).

	4.6	Form of Certificate for the Old National Bancorp Fixed Rate Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock, Series T (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of Old National’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 12, 2008).

	4.7	Warrant for the Purchase of shares of Old National Bancorp Common Stock (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 of Old National’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 12, 2008).

	10.1	Deferred Compensation Plan for Directors of Old National Bancorp and Subsidiaries (As Amended and Restated Effective as of January 1, 2003) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(a) of Old National’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 15, 2004).*

	10.2	Second Amendment to the Deferred Compensation Plan for Directors of Old National Bancorp and Subsidiaries (As Amended and Restated Effective as of January 1, 2003) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(b) of Old National’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 15, 2004).*


Exhibit No.		Description
	10.3	2005 Directors Deferred Compensation Plan (Effective as of January 1, 2005) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(c) of Old National’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 15, 2004).*

	10.4	Supplemental Deferred Compensation Plan for Select Executive Employees of Old National Bancorp and Subsidiaries (As Amended and Restated Effective as of January 1, 2003) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(d) of Old National’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 15, 2004).*

	10.5	Second Amendment to the Supplemental Deferred Compensation Plan for Select Executive Employees of Old National Bancorp and Subsidiaries (As Amended and Restated Effective as of January 1, 2003) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(e) of Old National’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 15, 2004).*

	10.6	Third Amendment to the Supplemental Deferred Compensation Plan for Select Executive Employees of Old National Bancorp and Subsidiaries (As Amended and Restated Effective as of January 1, 2003) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(f) of Old National’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 15, 2004).*

	10.7	2005 Executive Deferred Compensation Plan (Effective as of January 1, 2005) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(g) of Old National’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 15, 2004).*

	10.8	Summary of Old National Bancorp’s Outside Director Compensation Program (incorporated by reference to Old National’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2003).*

	10.9	Old National Bancorp Short-Term Incentive Compensation Plan (incorporated by reference to Appendix II of Old National’s Definitive Proxy Statement filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 16, 2005).*

	10.10	Old National Bancorp 1999 Equity Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Old National’s Form S-8 filed on July 20, 2001).*

	10.11	First Amendment to the Old National Bancorp 1999 Equity Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(f) of Old National’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2004).*


Exhibit No.		~~10.17~~	Description
	10.16		Form of 2006 “Service-Based” Restricted Stock Award Agreement between Old National and certain key associates (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.2 of Old National’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 2, 2006).*

	~~10.18~~10.17		Form of 2006 Non-qualified Stock Option Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.3 of Old National’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 2, 2006).*

	~~10.19~~10.18		Form of 2007 “Performance-Based” Restricted Stock Award Agreement between Old National and certain key associates (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(w) of Old National’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006).*

	~~10.20~~10.19		Form of 2007 “Service-Based” Restricted Stock Award Agreement between Old National and certain key associates (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(x) of Old National’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006).*

	~~10.21~~10.20		Form of 2007 Non-qualified Stock Option Agreement between Old National and certain key associates (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(y) of Old National’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006).*

	~~10.22~~		Purchase and Sale Agreement dated December 20, 2006, between Old National Bancorp, Old National Bank, Old National Realty Company, Inc., ONB One Main Landlord, LLC, ONB 123 Main Landlord, LLC, and ONB 4^th ~~Street Landlord, LLC (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(z) of Old National’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006).~~

	~~10.23~~10.21		Lease Agreement, dated December 20, 2006 between ONB One Main Landlord, LLC and Old National Bank (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(aa) of Old National’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006).

	~~10.24~~10.22		Lease Agreement, dated December 20, 2006 between ONB 123 Main Landlord, LLC and Old National Bank (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(ab) of Old National’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006).


~~Exhibit No.~~		~~Description~~
	~~10.25~~10.23		Lease Agreement, dated December 20, 2006 between ONB 4^th Street Landlord, LLC and Old National Bank (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(ac) of Old National’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006).

	~~10.26~~		Agreement and Plan of Merger dated as of October 21, 2006 by and among Old National Bancorp, St. Joseph Capital Corporation and SMS Subsidiary, Inc. (the schedules and exhibits have been omitted pursuant to Item 601(b)(2) of Regulation S-K) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 of Old National’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on October 23, 2006).

	~~10.27~~		Purchase and Sale Agreement dated September 19, 2007, by and among Old National Bank, ONB Insurance Group, Inc., ONB CTL Portfolio Landlord #1, LLC, ONB CTL Portfolio Landlord #2, LLC, ONB CTL Portfolio Landlord #3, LLC, ONB CTL Portfolio Landlord #4, LLC and ONB CTL Portfolio Landlord #5, LLC (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 of Old National’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 25, 2007).

	~~10.28~~10.24		Master Lease Agreement dated September 19, 2007, by and between ONB CTL Portfolio Landlord #1, LLC, and Old National Bank (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.2 of Old National’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 25, 2007).

	~~10.29~~10.25		Lease Supplement No. 1 dated September 19, 2007, by and between ONB CTL Portfolio Landlord #1, LLC, Old National Bank and ONB Insurance Group, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.3 of Old National’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 25, 2007).

	~~10.30~~10.26		Master Lease Agreement dated September 19, 2007, by and between ONB CTL Portfolio Landlord #2, LLC, and Old National Bank (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.4 of Old National’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 25, 2007).

	~~10.31~~10.27		Master Lease Agreement dated September 19, 2007, by and between ONB CTL Portfolio Landlord #3, LLC, and Old National Bank (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.5 of Old National’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 25, 2007).

	~~10.32~~10.28		Master Lease Agreement dated September 19, 2007, by and between ONB CTL Portfolio Landlord #4, LLC, and Old National Bank (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.6 of Old National’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 25, 2007).


~~Exhibit No.~~		~~Description~~
	~~10.35~~10.30	Form of Lease Agreement dated October 19, 2007 entered into by affiliates of Old National Bancorp and affiliates of SunTrust Equity Funding, LLC (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.2 of Old National’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on October 25, 2007).

	~~10.36~~	Purchase and Sale Agreement dated December 27, 2007, by and among Old National Bank, ONB Traditional Portfolio Landlord, LLC, ONB Site 1 Landlord, LLC, ONB Site 8 Landlord, LLC, ONB Site 9 Landlord, LLC, ONB Site 38 Landlord, LLC, and ONB Site 42 Landlord, LLC (as incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 of Old National’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 31, 2007).

	~~10.37~~10.31	Form of Lease Agreement dated December 27, 2007 entered into by affiliates of Old National Bancorp and affiliates of SunTrust Equity Funding, LLC (as incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.2 of Old National’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 31, 2007).

	~~10.38~~10.32	Form of 2008 Non-qualified Stock Option Award Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 of Old National’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on January 30, 2008).*

	~~10.39~~10.33	Form of 2008 “Performance-Based” Restricted Stock Award Agreement between Old National and certain key associates (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.2 of Old National’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on January 30, 2008).*

	~~10.40~~10.34	Form of 2008 “Service-Based” Restricted Stock Award Agreement between Old National and certain key associates (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.3 of Old National’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on January 30, 2008).*

	~~10.41~~10.35	Form of Employment Agreement for Robert G. Jones, Daryl D. Moore, Barbara A. Murphy and Christopher A. Wolking (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of Old National’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 21, 2008).*

	~~10.42~~10.36	Severance/Change in Control Agreement between Old National and Annette W. Hudgions (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of Old National’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 21, 2008).*

	~~10.43~~10.37	Old National Bancorp 2008 Incentive Compensation Plan (incorporated by reference to Appendix II of Old National’s Definitive Proxy Statement filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 27, 2008).*

	~~10.44~~	Old National Bancorp 2008 Incentive Compensation Plan (incorporated by reference to Old National’s Form S-8 filed on August 5, 2008).*

	~~10.45~~10.38	Old National Bancorp Code of Conduct (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 14.1 of Old National’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on October 29, 2008).

	10.39	Letter Agreement dated December 12, 2008 by and between Old National Bancorp and the United States Department of Treasury which includes the Securities Purchase Agreement — Standard Terms (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of Old National’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 12, 2008).

	10.40	Form of Senior Executive Officer Letter Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of Old National’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 12, 2008).

	10.41	Form of Waiver (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 of Old National’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 12, 2008).

	10.42	Form of 2009 Performance Share Award Agreement — Internal Performance Measures between Old National and certain key associates (incorporated by reference to Old National’s Current Report on Form 8-K/A filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 13, 2009).*


Exhibit No.		Description
	10.43	Form of 2009 Performance Share Award Agreement — Relative Performance Measures between Old National and certain key associates (incorporated by reference to Old National’s Current Report on Form 8-K/A filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 13, 2009).*

	10.44	Form of 2009 “Service-Based” Restricted Stock Award Agreement between Old National and certain key associates (incorporated by reference to Old National’s Current Report on Form 8-K/A filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 13, 2009).*

	10.45	Form of 2009 Executive Stock Option Agreement between Old National and certain key associates (incorporated by reference to Old National’s Current Report on Form 8-K/A filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 13, 2009).*

	10.46	Purchase and Assumption Agreement dated November 24, 2008 by and among Old National Bank and RBS Citizens, National Association (the schedules and exhibits have been omitted pursuant to Item 601(b)(2) of Regulation S-K) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 of Old National’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 20, 2009).

	10.47	Preferred Stock Repurchase Agreement dated March 31, 2009 by and between Old National Bancorp and the United States Department of Treasury (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of Old National’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 31, 2009).

	10.48	Form of Termination of Senior Executive Officer Letter Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of Old National’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 31, 2009).

	31.1	Certification of Principal Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

	31.2	Certification of Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

	32.1	Certification of Principal Executive Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

	32.2	Certification of Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.


*		Management contract or compensatory plan or ~~arrangement~~arrangement.

5262


	Page No.
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements

Consolidated Balance ~~Sheet~~ ~~September 30, 2008~~Sheets
March 31, 2009 (unaudited), December 31, ~~2007~~2008 and ~~September 30, 2007~~March 31, 2008 (unaudited)		3

Consolidated ~~Statement~~Statements of Income (unaudited)
Three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2009 and 2008 ~~and 2007 (unaudited)~~		4

Consolidated ~~Statement~~Statements of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity ~~Nine~~ (unaudited)
Three months ended ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2009 and 2008 ~~and 2007 (unaudited)~~		5

Consolidated ~~Statement~~Statements of Cash Flows ~~Nine~~ (unaudited)
Three months ended ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2009 and 2008 ~~and 2007 (unaudited)~~		6

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)		7

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations		2932

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk		4750

Item 4. Controls and Procedures		4750

PART IIII. OTHER INFORMATION		4851

SIGNATURES		5363

Exhibit 31.1
Exhibit 31.2
Exhibit 32.1
Exhibit 32.2


	March 31, 2009				Weighted
	Amortized		Fair		Average
(dollars in thousands)	Cost		Value		Yield
Maturity
Available-for-sale
Within one year	$	301,381	$	307,551		5.94	%
One to five years		856,331		813,048		4.97
Five to ten years		255,516		255,871		5.84
Beyond ten years		1,354,084		1,333,833		5.15

Total	$	2,767,312	$	2,710,303		5.24	%


Held-to-maturity
One to five years	$	92,989	$	95,334		4.50	%

Total	$	92,989	$	95,334		4.50	%


	September 30,		December 31,		March 31,		December 31,
(dollars in thousands)	2008		2007		2009		2008
Impaired loans without an allowance for loan losses allocation	$	12,941	$	11,278	$	16,925	$	13,968
Impaired loans with an allowance for loan losses allocation		43,326		19,027		48,876		38,425

Total impaired loans	$	56,267	$	30,305	$	65,801	$	52,393


Allowance for loan losses allocated to impaired loans	$	15,349	$	5,904	$	18,442	$	13,599


			Accumulated							Accumulated
	Gross Carrying		Amortization			Net Carrying		Gross Carrying		Amortization			Net Carrying
(dollars in thousands)	Amount		and Impairment			Amount		Amount		and Impairment			Amount
September 30, 2008
March 31, 2009
Amortized intangible assets:
Core deposit	$	15,623	$	(6,884	)	$	8,739	$	26,810	$	(7,606	)	$	19,204
Customer business relationships		25,753		(9,669	)		16,084		25,753		(10,688	)		15,065
Customer loan relationships		4,413		(669	)		3,744		4,413		(869	)		3,544

Total intangible assets	$	45,789	$	(17,222	)	$	28,567	$	56,976	$	(19,163	)	$	37,813

December 31, 2007
December 31, 2008
Amortized intangible assets:
Core deposit	$	15,623	$	(5,897	)	$	9,726	$	15,623	$	(7,203	)	$	8,420
Customer business relationships		25,553		(7,546	)		18,007		25,753		(10,189	)		15,564
Customer loan relationships		4,413		(368	)		4,045		4,413		(769	)		3,644

Total intangible assets	$	45,589	$	(13,811	)	$	31,778	$	45,789	$	(18,161	)	$	27,628


(dollars in thousands)
Due in 2008	$	10
Due in 2009		2,040		$	2,030
Due in 2010		124,043			99,043
Due in 2011		275,046			275,046
Due in 2012		150,688			150,688
Due in 2013					106,405
Thereafter		287,388			178,291
SFAS 133 fair value hedge and other basis adjustments		(1,900	)		(1,545	)

Total	$	837,315		$	809,958


(1)		A $0.23 cash dividend was paid in the first quarter of 2008. However, the first quarter dividend was declared in December 2007 and is included in fourth quarter 2007 results.


				Unrecognized			Defined			Accumulated			Unrealized			Unrecognized			Defined			Accumulated
	Unrealized			gain (loss) on			benefit			other			gains (losses)			gain (loss) on			benefit			other
	gains (losses)			cash flow			pension			comprehensive			on available for			cash flow			pension			comprehensive
(dollars in thousands)	on securities			hedges			plans			income (loss)			sale securities			hedges			plans			income (loss)
Balance at December 31, 2008													$	(40,504	)	$	(480	)	$	(12,520	)	$	(53,504	)
Other comprehensive income (loss)														2,522			709			429			3,660
Other-than-temporary-impairment on available-for-sale securities realized in income														2,391			—			—			2,391

Balance at March 31, 2009													$	(35,591	)	$	229		$	(12,091	)	$	(47,453	)


Balance at December 31, 2007	$	(3,704	)	$	(655	)	$	(6,986	)	$	(11,345	)	$	(3,704	)	$	(655	)	$	(6,986	)	$	(11,345	)
Other comprehensive income (loss)		(40,579	)		131			(4,890	)		(45,338	)		2,438			43			95			2,576

Balance at September 30, 2008	$	(44,283	)	$	(524	)	$	(11,876	)	$	(56,683	)
Balance at March 31, 2008													$	(1,266	)	$	(612	)	$	(6,891	)	$	(8,769	)


Balance at December 31, 2006	$	(16,286	)	$	(998	)	$	(7,829	)	$	(25,113	)
Other comprehensive income (loss)		(65	)		299			1,254			1,488

Balance at September 30, 2007	$	(16,351	)	$	(699	)	$	(6,575	)	$	(23,625	)


	Asset Derivatives						Asset Derivatives
	September 30, 2008			December 31, 2007			March 31, 2009			December 31, 2008
	Balance			Balance			Balance			Balance
	Sheet	Fair		Sheet	Fair		Sheet	Fair		Sheet	Fair
(dollars in thousands)	Location	Value		Location	Value		Location	Value		Location	Value
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments under Statement 133
Interest rate contracts	Other assets	$	—	Other assets	$	716	Other assets	$	1,122	Other assets	$	1

Total derivatives designated as hedging instruments under Statement 133		$	—		$	716		$	1,122		$	1

Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments under Statement 133
Interest rate contracts	Other assets	$	15,545	Other assets	$	14,100	Other assets	$	43,469	Other assets	$	45,737
Commodity contracts	Other assets		662	Other assets		2,011	Other assets		—	Other assets		130
Foreign exchange contracts	Other assets		62	Other assets		—	Other assets		178	Other assets		441
Mortgage contracts	Other assets		189	Other assets		70	Other assets		1,039	Other assets		459

Total derivatives not designated as hedging instruments under Statement 133		$	16,458		$	16,181		$	44,686		$	46,767

Total derivatives		$	16,458		$	16,897		$	45,808		$	46,768


	Liability Derivatives						Liability Derivatives
	September 30, 2008			December 31, 2007			March 31, 2009			December 31, 2008
	Balance			Balance			Balance			Balance
	Sheet	Fair		Sheet	Fair		Sheet	Fair		Sheet	Fair
(dollars in thousands)	Location	Value		Location	Value		Location	Value		Location	Value
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments under Statement 133
Interest rate contracts	Other liabilities	$	67	Other liabilities	$	649	Other liabilities	$	—	Other liabilities	$	—
Mortgage contracts	Other liabilities		—	Other liabilities		62	Other liabilities		—	Other liabilities		—

Total derivatives designated as hedging instruments under Statement 133		$	67		$	711		$	—		$	—

Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments under Statement 133
Interest rate contracts	Other liabilities	$	16,200	Other liabilities	$	14,100	Other liabilities	$	43,599	Other liabilities	$	46,338
Commodity contracts	Other liabilities		662	Other liabilities		2,011	Other liabilities		—	Other liabilities		130
Foreign exchange contracts	Other liabilities		62	Other liabilities		—	Other liabilities		178	Other liabilities		441
Mortgage contracts	Other liabilities		—	Other liabilities		55	Other liabilities		757	Other liabilities		505

Total derivatives not designated as hedging instruments under Statement 133		$	16,924		$	16,166		$	44,534		$	47,414

Total derivatives		$	16,991		$	16,877		$	44,534		$	47,414


(1)		Amounts represent the net interest payments as stated in the contractual agreements.

(2)		Amounts represent ineffectiveness on derivatives designated as fair value hedges under SFAS 133.

(3)		Includes both the valuation differences between the customer and offsetting counterparty swaps as well as the change in the value of the derivative instruments entered into to offset the change in fair value of certain retail certificates of deposit which the company elected to record at fair value under SFAS 159. See Note 19 to the consolidated financial statements.


			Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2008 Using
					Significant
			Quoted Prices in		Other		Significant
			Active Markets for		Observable		Unobservable
	Carrying		Identical Assets		Inputs		Inputs
(dollars in thousands)	Value		(Level 1)		(Level 2)		(Level 3)

Financial Assets
Investment securities available-for-sale	$	2,125,026		—	$	2,105,358	$	19,668
Residential loans held for sale		17,155		—		17,155		—
Derivative assets		46,768		—		46,768		—
Financial Liabilities
Certain retail certificates of deposit		49,309		—		49,309		—
Derivative liabilities		47,414		—		47,414		—


	Fair Value Measurements
	using Significant			Fair Value Measurements
	Unobservable Inputs			using Significant
	(Level 3)			Unobservable Inputs
	Pooled Trust			(Level 3)
	Preferred			Pooled Trust Preferred
	Securities			Securities Available-
(dollars in thousands)	Available-for-Sale			for-Sale
Beginning balance, June 30, 2008	$	28,735
Beginning balance, January 1, 2009				$	19,668
Accretion/amortization of discount or premium		1			(5	)
Payments received		—			(17	)
Decease in market value of securities		(12,767	)
Decease in fair value of securities					(8,491	)
Transfers in and/or out of Level 3		3,551			—

Ending balance, September 30, 2008	$	19,520
Ending balance, March 31, 2009				$	11,155


Changes in Fair Value for the Three Months ended March 31, 2009, for Items
Measured at Fair Value Pursuant to Election of the Fair Value Option
									Total Changes
									in Fair Values
	Other								Included in
	Gains and			Interest		Interest			Current Period
(dollars in thousands)	(Losses)			Income		(Expense)			Earnings
Residential loans held for sale	$	605		$	—	$	(1	)	$	604
Certain retail certificates of deposit		(61	)		—		(83	)		(144	)


	Regulatory												Regulatory
	Guidelines			September 30,						December 31,			Guidelines			March 31,						December 31,
	Minimum			2008			2007			2007			Minimum			2009			2008			2008
Risk-based capital:
Tier 1 capital to total avg assets (leverage ratio)		4.00	%		8.29	%		7.66	%		7.72	%		4.00	%		7.30	%		8.03	%		9.50	%
Tier 1 capital to risk-adjusted total assets		4.00			11.36			10.52			10.60			4.00			9.89			10.95			12.73
Total capital to risk-adjusted total assets		8.00			14.28			13.91			13.34			8.00			12.20			13.84			15.06
Shareholders’ equity to assets		N/A			8.39			8.27			8.32			N/A			7.56			8.74			9.28


(1)		Loans include residential loans held for sale.

(2)		Non-performing loans include nonaccrual and renegotiated loans.


Interest Rate Change in Basis Points (bp)													Interest Rate Change in Basis Points (bp)
	Down 300		Down 200		Down 100		Up 100		Up 200		Up 300			Down 300	Down 200	Down 100	Up 100	Up 200	Up 300
Green Zone		12.00%		6.50%		3.00%		3.00%		6.50%		12.00%		-12.00%	-6.50%	-3.00%	-3.00%	-6.50%	-12.00%
Yellow Zone		12.00% - 15.00%		6.50% - 8.50%		3.00% - 4.00%		3.00% - 4.00%		6.50% - 8.50%		12.00% - 15.00%		-12.00% to -15.00%	-6.50% to -8.50%	-3.00% to -4.00%	-3.00% to -4.00%	-6.50% to -8.50%	-12.00% to -15.00%
Red Zone		15.00%		8.50%		4.00%		4.00%		8.50%		15.00%		-15.00%	-8.50%	-4.00%	-4.00%	-8.50%	-15.00%

9/30/2008		N/A		-6.51%		-0.82%		0.19%		0.21%		0.00%
9/30/2007		2.76%		2.83%		2.05%		-1.29%		-3.08%		-5.18%
3/31/2009														N/A	N/A	N/A	3.37%	4.01%	3.03%
3/31/2008														N/A	-0.91%	1.16%	-0.84%	-1.91%	-2.83%


(A)		For the remaining ~~three~~nine months of fiscal ~~2008.~~2009.

	•		The underlying fundamentals of the relevant market and the outlook for such market for the near future;

	•		Our intent ~~and ability~~ to ~~hold~~sell the debt security ~~for a period of time sufficient~~or whether it is more likely than not that we will be required to ~~allow for any~~sell the debt security before its anticipated ~~recovery in market value;~~recovery; and

	•		When applicable for purchased beneficial interests, the estimated cash flows of the securities are assessed for adverse changes.

•		our ability to execute our business plan;

•		a weakening of the economy which could materially impact credit quality trends and the ability to generate loans;

•		changes in the securities markets; and

•		changes in fiscal, monetary and tax policies.


~~Exhibit No.~~		~~Description~~
	~~10.12~~	Form of 2004 “Performance-Based” Restricted Stock Award Agreement between Old National and certain key associates (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(g) of Old National’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2004).*

	~~10.13~~10.12	Form of 2005 “Performance-Based” Restricted Stock Award Agreement between Old National and certain key associates, (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(r) of Old National’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2005). *

	~~10.14~~10.13	Form of Executive Stock Option Award Agreement between Old National and certain key associates (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(h) of Old National’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2004).*

	~~10.15~~10.14	Stock Purchase and Dividend Reinvestment Plan (incorporated by reference to Old National’s Registration Statement on Form S-3, Registration No. 333-120545 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 16, 2004).

	~~10.16~~10.15	Form of 2006 “Performance-Based” Restricted Stock Award Agreement between Old National and certain key associates (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 of Old National’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 2, 2006).*


Exhibit No.		~~10.33~~	Description
	10.29		Master Lease Agreement dated September 19, 2007, by and between ONB CTL Portfolio Landlord #5, LLC, and Old National Bank (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.7 of Old National’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 25, 2007).

	~~10.34~~		Purchase and Sale Agreement dated October 19, 2007, by and among Old National Bank, American National Trust and Investment Management Company, ONB Traditional Portfolio Landlord, LLC, ONB Site 3 Landlord, LLC, ONB Site Landlord 4, LLC, ONB Site Landlord 6, LLC, ONB Site Landlord 14, LLC, ONB Site Landlord 15, LLC, ONB Site Landlord 17, LLC, ONB Site Landlord 19, LLC, ONB Site Landlord 20, LLC, ONB Site Landlord 25, LLC, ONB Site Landlord 26, LLC, ONB Site Landlord 27, LLC, ONB Site Landlord 29, LLC, ONB Site Landlord 33, LLC, ONB Site Landlord 35, LLC, ONB Site Landlord 36, LLC, ONB Site Landlord 37, LLC, ONB Site Landlord 41, LLC, ONB Site Landlord 43, LLC, ONB Site Landlord 44, LLC, ONB Site Landlord 45, LLC, ONB Site Landlord 47, LLC, ONB Site Landlord 48, LLC and ONB Site Landlord 57, LLC (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 of Old National’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on October 25, 2007).


		OLD NATIONAL BANCORP
(Registrant)

By:	/s/ Christopher A. Wolking Christopher A. Wolking
	Senior Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
	Duly Authorized Officer and Principal Financial Officer

	Date: ~~October 31, 2008~~May 1, 2009