UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549


FORM 10Q


(Mark One)

þ

þ

QUARTERLY REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934.


For the quarterly period ended SeptemberJune 30, 20182019


o

o

TRANSITION REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE EXCHANGE ACT


For the transition period from _________ to ________


Commission file numbers 000–32141


NUTRA PHARMA CORP.

(Name of registrant as specified in its charter)


California91–2021600

California

91–2021600

(State or Other Jurisdiction of Organization)

(IRS Employer Identification Number)


1537 NW 65th Avenue

Plantation, FL

33313

12538 West Atlantic Blvd.,

Coral Springs, Florida

33071

(Address of principal executive offices)

(Zip Code)


(954) 509–0911

(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)


Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.   Yes ¨Noþ No ¨


Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation ST (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).  Yes ¨ No þ No ¨


Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a nonaccelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company.


Large accelerated filer ¨

Accelerated filer ¨

Nonaccelerated filer þ¨

Smaller reporting company ¨þ

Emerging Growth Company ¨


If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the Registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act.  o


Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No þ


The numberAs of shares outstanding of the registrants common stock, par value $0.001 per share, as of November 19, 2018,May 7, 2021, there was 4,020,246,110were 7,214,349,714 shares of common stock.stock and 3,000,000 shares of Series A preferred stock issued and outstanding.





TABLE OF CONTENTS


PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

2

4

Item 1. Financial Statements

2

4

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of SeptemberJune 30, 20182019 (Unaudited) and December 31, 2017

2018

2

5

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Three and NineSix Months Ended SeptemberJune 30, 2019
and 2018 and 2017 (Unaudited)

3

6

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Deficit for the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2019 and 2018 (Unaudited)

7
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the NineSix Months Ended SeptemberJune 30, 20182019
and 20172018 (Unaudited)

4

7

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

5

8

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

21

32

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

27

39

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

27

39

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

28

40

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

28

40

Item 1A. Risk Factors

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

29

41

Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities

29

43

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosure

31

43

Item 5. Other Information

31

43

Item 6. Exhibits

31

43




i




NUTRA PHARMA CORP.


Nutra Pharma Corp. is referred to hereinafter as “we”, “us” or “our”


Forward Looking Statements


This Quarterly Report on Form 10–Q for the period ending SeptemberJune 30, 2018,2019, contains forward–looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties, as well as assumptions that if they never materialize or prove incorrect, could cause our results to differ materially from those expressed or implied by such forward–looking statements. The words or phrases “would be,” “will allow, “intends to,” “will likely result,” “are expected to,” “will continue,” “is anticipated,” “estimate,” “project,��� or similar expressions are intended to identify “forward–looking statements.” We are subject to risks detailed in Item 1(a). All statements other than statements of historical fact are statements that could be deemed forward–looking statements, including: (a) any projections of revenue, gross margin, expenses, earnings or losses from operations, synergies or other financial items; and (b) any statements of the plans, strategies and objectives of management for future operations; and (c) any statement concerning developments, plans, or performance. Unless otherwise required by applicable law, we do not undertake and we specifically disclaim any obligation to update any forward–looking statements to reflect occurrences, developments, unanticipated events or circumstances after the date of such statement.



PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION


Item 1. Financial Statements


NUTRA PHARMA CORP.

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets


 

September 30,

 

December 31,

 

2018

 

2017

 June 30,
2019
 December 31,
2018

 

(Unaudited)

 

 

 (Unaudited) 

ASSETS

 

 

 

 

 

Current assets:

 

 

 

 

 

Cash

$

14,159

$

-

$113,713$-

Accounts receivable

 

16,906

 

15,143

 28,134 17,065

Inventory

 

41,786

 

20,142

 36,528 35,302

Prepaid expenses and other current assets

 

151,757

 

52,500

 44,348 63,000

Total current assets

 

224,608

 

87,785

 222,723 115,367

 

 

 

 

 

Due from officer

 

-

 

269,772

Property and equipment, net

 

11,605

 

16,463

 8,290 10,500

Other assets

 

15,550

 

15,550

Operating lease right-of-use assets 251,887 -
Security deposit 15,550 15,550

Total assets

$

251,763

$

389,570

$498,450$141,417

 

 

 

 

 

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT

 

 

 

 

 

Current liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

Accounts payable

$

1,533,023

$

1,301,988

$553,277$475,409

Accrued expenses

 

869,417

 

1,002,980

 887,948 831,849

Deferred revenue

 

-

 

22,490

Accrued payroll due to officers 1,153,893 1,050,993
Accrued interest to related parties 150,372 141,808

Due to officer

 

200,437

 

-

 161,418 186,497

Derivative warrant liability

 

1,975

 

5,903

 1,934 1,468

Other debt, net of discount

 

2,944,217

 

3,466,403

Other debt, net of discount, current portion 4,867,086 3,338,576
Operating lease obligations, current portion 68,806 -

Total current liabilities

 

5,549,069

 

5,799,764

 7,844,734 6,026,600

Promissory note

 

64,617

 

-

Promissory note, less current portion 4,616 51,410
Convertible note, less current portion 119,879 -
Operating lease obligations, less current portion 181,379 -

Total liabilities

 

5,613,686

 

5,799,764

 8,150,608 6,078,010

 

 

 

 

 

Commitments and Contingencies (See Note 8)

 

 

 

 

Commitments and Contingencies 

 

 

 

 

 

Stockholders' deficit:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

Preferred stock, $0.001 par value, 20,000,000 shares authorized: 3,000,000 Series A Preferred shares issued and outstanding at September 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017

 

3,000

 

3000

Common stock, $0.001 par value, 8,000,000,000 shares and 2,000,000,000 shares authorized: 4,014,246,110 and 2,032,233,701 shares issued and outstanding at September 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017

 

4,014,246

 

2,032,234

Preferred stock, $0.001 par value, 20,000,000 shares authorized: 3,000,000 Series A Preferred shares issued and outstanding at June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018 3,000 3,000
Common stock, $0.001 par value, 8,000,000,000 shares authorized: 5,038,246,111 and 4,046,746,110 shares issued and outstanding at June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018 5,038,246 4,046,746

Additional paid-in capital

 

54,415,239

 

49,942,719

 50,648,088 51,286,503

Accumulated deficit

 

(63,794,408)

 

(57,388,147)

 (63,341,492) (61,272,842)

Total stockholders' deficit

 

(5,361,923)

 

(5,410,194)

 (7,652,158) (5,936,593)

Total liabilities and stockholders' deficit

$

251,763

$

389,570

$498,450$141,417



See the accompanying notes to the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements



NUTRA PHARMA CORP.

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations

(Unaudited)


 For the Three Months
Ended June 30,
 For the Six Months
Ended June 30,

 

For the Three Months

Ended September 30,

 

For the Nine Months

Ended September 30,

 2019 2018 2019 2018

 

2018

 

2017

 

2018

 

2017

 (Restated) (Restated)

Net sales

$

43,966

$

38,049

$

104,323

$

88,207

$10,215$29,381$51,537$60,357

Cost of sales

 

37,409

 

4,340

 

58,338

 

23,122

 (3,774) (16,570) (19,399) (20,929)

Gross profit

 

6,557

 

33,709

 

45,985

 

65,085

 6,441 12,811 32,138 39,428

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Operating expenses:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Selling, general and administrative - including stock based compensation of $30,000 and $4,985 for the three months ended September 30, 2018 and 2017, and $40,000 and $67,020 for the nine months ended September 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively

 

860,808

 

307,232

 

1,573,541

 

1,172,086

Selling, general and administrative - including stock based compensation of $26,500 and $10,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018, and $56,500 and $10,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018, respectively 334,287 348,660 608,922 712,733

Total operating expenses

 

860,808

 

307,232

 

1,573,541

 

1,172,086

 334,287 348,660 608,922 712,733

Loss from operations

 

(854,251)

 

(273,523)

 

(1,527,556)

 

(1,107,001)

 (327,846) (335,849) (576,784) (673,305)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other Income (Expenses):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Rental Income

 

525

 

-

 

525

 

-

Other income (expenses) 

Interest expense

 

(266,889)

 

(95,063)

 

(707,372)

 

(265,915)

 (59,832) (161,312) (134,977) (432,872)

Change in fair value of derivatives

 

192,800

 

(612,863)

 

(4,151,435)

 

(1,649,719)

Loss on settlement of debt, net

 

(40,100)

 

-

 

(20,423)

 

(14,189)

Total other expenses

 

(113,664)

 

(707,926)

 

(4,878,705)

 

(1,929,823)

Interest expense to related parties (4,368) (3,882) (8,564) (7,611)
Change in fair value of convertible notes and derivatives (1,275,111) (849,376) (1,404,528) (1,982,864)
Gain (Loss) on settlement of debt and accounts payable, net (1,050) 19,677 56,203 768,323
Total Other income (expenses) (1,340,361) (994,893) (1,491,866) (1,655,024)

Loss before income taxes

 

(967,915)

 

(981,449)

 

(6,406,261)

 

(3,036,824)

 (1,668,207) (1,330,742) (2,068,650) (2,328,329)

Provision for income taxes

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 - - - 

Net loss

$

(967,915)

$

(981,449)

$

(6,406,261)

$

(3,036,824)

$(1,668,207)$(1,330,742)$(2,068,650)$(2,328,329)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net loss per share - basic and diluted

$

(0.00)

$

(0.00)

$

(0.00)

$

(0.00)

$(0.00)$(0.00)$(0.00)$(0.00)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted average number of shares outstanding during the period - basic and diluted

 

3,709,263,480

 

1,429,770,513

 

2,880,009,357

 

1,282,194,310

Weighted average number of shares outstanding during the year - basic and diluted 4,612,987,869 2,723,756,675 4,336,212,961 2,458,305,604



See the accompanying notes to the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements



NUTRA PHARMA CORP.

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash FlowsChanges in Stockholders' Deficit

For the three months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018

(Unaudited)


      Additional   Total
  Preferred Stock Common Stock Paid-in Accumulated Stockholders'
  Shares Amount Shares Amount Capital Deficit Deficit
Balance -March 31, 2019 3,000,000$3,000 4,127,746,110$4,127,746$51,246,050$(61,673,285)$(6,296,489)
               
Issuance of common stock in exchange for services to consultants     135,000,000 135,000 (105,000)   30,000
Common stock issued for debt modification and penalty     3,500,000 3,500 (2,450)   1,050
Common stock issued for conversion of debt     750,000,000 750,000 (475,000)   275,000
Common stock issued with Debt--Debt discount     22,000,001 22,000 (15,512)   6,488
Net loss           (1,668,207) (1,668,207)
Balance -June 30, 2019 3,000,000$3,000 5,038,246,111$5,038,246$50,648,088$(63,341,492)$(7,652,158)
               


 

 

For the nine months

ended September 30,

 

 

2018

 

2017

Reconciliation of net loss to net cash used in operating activities:

 

 

 

 

Cash flows from operating activities:

 

 

 

 

Net loss

$

(6,406,261)

$

(3,036,824)

Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:

 

 

 

 

Bad debt expense

 

498,470

 

-

Loss on settlement of debt and accounts payable

 

20,423

 

14,189

Depreciation

 

4,858

 

4,421

Stock-based compensation

 

40,000

 

67,020

Stock issued for loan modification

 

198,865

 

4,440

Change in fair value of derivative

 

4,151,435

 

1,649,719

Amortization of loan discount

 

314,219

 

74,392

Changes in operating assets and liabilities:

 

 

 

 

Increase in accounts receivables

 

(1,763)

 

(14,050)

Decrease (Increase) in inventory

 

(21,644)

 

5,420

Decrease (Increase) in prepaid expenses and other assets

 

(19,257)

 

3,216

Increase in accounts payable

 

235,236

 

294,388

Increase in accrued expenses

 

144,007

 

21,709

Decrease in deferred revenue

 

(22,490)

 

-

Net cash used in operating activities

 

(863,902)

 

(911,960)

 

 

 

 

 

Cash flows from financing activities:

 

 

 

 

Loans from officers

 

107,100

 

302,350

Repayment of officers loans

 

(141,070)

 

(174,400)

Repayments of notes payable-related party

 

-

 

(15,209)

Proceeds from convertible notes, net of debt discount and
loan issuance cost of $40,450 and $0, respectively

 

941,800

 

550,500

Repayment of convertible notes

 

(3,000)

 

(40,000)

Proceeds from other notes payable

 

-

 

405,500

Repayments of other notes payable

 

(26,769)

 

(148,024)

Net cash provided by financing activities

 

878,061

 

880,717

 

 

 

 

 

Net (decrease) increase in cash

 

14,159

 

(31,243)

 

 

 

 

 

Cash - beginning of period

 

-

 

31,243

 

 

 

 

 

Cash - end of period

$

14,159

$

-

 

 

 

 

 

Supplemental Cash Flow Information:

 

 

 

 

Cash paid for interest

$

(5,425)

$

(75,207)

Cash paid for income taxes

$

-

$

-

Non cash Financing and Investing:

 

 

 

 

Note and stock issued in settlement of notes and accounts payable

$

348,050

$

-

Shares issued to satisfy debt

$

5,518,338

$

2,410,115

Discounts on notes payable

$

22,365

$

13,815

Debt discount for beneficial conversion features

$

246,913

$

5,241

      Additional   Total
  Preferred Stock Common Stock Paid-in Accumulated Stockholders'
  Shares Amount Shares Amount Capital Deficit Deficit
Balance -March 31, 2018 3,000,000$3,000 2,332,105,170$2,332,105$50,887,528$(58,385,734)$(5,163,101)
               
Issuance of common stock in exchange for services to consultants     100,000,000 100,000 20,000   120,000
Common stock issued for debt modification and penalty     1,000,000 1,000 700   1,700
Common stock issued for conversion of debt     802,946,997 802,947 350,681   1,153,628
Common stock issued with Debt--Debt discount     5,000,000 5,000 3,678   8,678
Beneficial conversion features         105,000   105,000
Net loss           (1,330,742) (1,330,742)
Balance -June 30, 2018 (Restated) 3,000,000$3,000 3,241,052,167$3,241,052$51,367,587$(59,716,476)$(5,104,837)



See the accompanying notes to the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements


4


NUTRA PHARMA CORP.


Condensed Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders' Deficit

For the six months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018

(Unaudited)

      Additional   Total
  Preferred Stock Common Stock Paid-in Accumulated Stockholders'
  Shares Amount Shares Amount Capital Deficit Deficit
Balance -December 31, 2018 3,000,000$3,000 4,046,746,110$4,046,746$51,286,503$(61,272,842)$(5,936,593)
               
Issuance of common stock in exchange for services to consultants     135,000,000 135,000 (105,000)   30,000
Common stock issued for debt modification and penalty     3,500,000 3,500 (2,450)   1,050
Common stock issued for conversion of debt     750,000,000 750,000 (475,000)   275,000
Common stock issued with Debt--Debt discount     22,000,001 22,000 (15,512)   6,488
Common stock issued for settlement of debt     81,000,000 81,000 (48,600)   32,400
Warrants issued with Debt--Debt discount         8,147   8,147
Net loss           (2,068,650) (2,068,650)
Balance -June 30, 2019 3,000,000$3,000 5,038,246,111$5,038,246$50,648,088$(63,341,492)$(7,652,158)

      Additional   Total
  Preferred Stock Common Stock Paid-in Accumulated Stockholders'
  Shares Amount Shares Amount Capital Deficit Deficit
Balance -December 31, 2017 3,000,000$3,000 2,032,233,701$2,032,234$49,942,719$(57,388,147)$(5,410,194)
               
Issuance of common stock in exchange for services to consultants     100,000,000 100,000 20,000   120,000
Common stock issued for debt modification and penalty     71,621,469 71,621 28,949   100,570
Common stock issued for conversion of debt     1,027,946,997 1,027,947 1,130,691   2,158,638
Common stock issued with Debt--Debt discount     9,250,000 9,250 9,315   18,565
Beneficial conversion features         235,913   235,913
Net loss           (2,328,329) (2,328,329)
Balance -June 30, 2018 (Restated) 3,000,000$3,000 3,241,052,167$3,241,052$51,367,587$(59,716,476)$(5,104,837)

See the accompanying notes to the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements

NUTRA PHARMA CORP.

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

(Unaudited)

  For the Six Months
Ended June 30,
  2019 2018
    (Restated)
Cash flows from operating activities:    
  Net loss$(2,068,650)$(2,328,329)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:    
Bad debt expense 31,789 -
Accrued interest expense for amount due to officer 3,536 -
Gain on settlement of debt and accounts payable (56,203) (768,323)
Depreciation 2,210 3,753
Stock-based compensation 56,500 10,000
Stock-based loan modification cost - 126,700
Change in fair value of convertible notes and derivatives 1,404,528 1,982,864
Amortization of loan discount 62,078 207,837
Amortization of operating lease right-of-use assets 29,288 -
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:    
Increase in accounts receivables (13,858) (1,137)
Increase in inventory (1,226) (39,282)
Increase in prepaid expenses and other current assets (7,848) (44,257)
Increase in accounts payable 77,868 113,083
Increase in accrued expenses 115,811 58,610
Increase in accrued payroll due to officers 102,900 -
Decrease in deferred revenue - (22,490)
Increase in accrued interest to related parties 8,564 -
Decrease in operating lease obligations (30,990) -
Net cash used in operating activities (283,703) (700,971)
     
Cash flows from financing activities:    
Loans from officer 4,100 105,100
Repayment of officers loans (61,715) (106,150)
Proceeds from notes payable-related party - -
Repayments of notes payable-related party - -
Proceeds from convertible notes, net of debt discount and
loan issuance cost $5,000 and $14,650, respectively
 484,879 729,000
Repayment of convertible notes (10,000) -
Repayments of other notes payable (19,848) (4,000)
Net cash provided by financing activities 397,416 723,950
     
Net increase in cash 113,713 22,979
     
Cash - beginning of period - -
     
Cash - end of period$113,713$22,979
     
Supplemental Cash Flow Information:    
Cash paid for interest$-$5,425
Cash paid for income taxes$-$-
Non cash Financing and Investing:    
Note and stock issued in settlement of notes and accounts payable$32,400$-
Shares issued to satisfy debt$275,000$5,242,524
Discounts on notes payable$14,635$18,565
Debt discount for beneficial conversion features$-$235,913
Right-of-use asset due to adoption of ASC 842$281,175$-
Operating lease liabilities due to adoption of ASC 842$281,175$-

See the accompanying notes to the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements

NUTRA PHARMA CORP.

Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

SeptemberJune 30, 20182019


1.     BASIS OF PRESENTATION AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES


Organization

 

Nutra Pharma Corp. (“Nutra Pharma”), is a holding company that owns intellectual property and operates in the biotechnology industry. Nutra Pharma was incorporated under the laws of the state of California on February 1, 2000, under the original name of Exotic-Bird.com.


Through its wholly-owned subsidiary, ReceptoPharm, Inc. (“ReceptoPharm”), Nutra Pharma conducts drug discovery research and development activities. In October 2009, Nutra Pharma launched its first consumer product called Cobroxin®, an over-the-counter pain reliever designed to treat moderate to severe chronic pain. In May 2010, Nutra Pharma launched its second consumer product called Nyloxin®, an over-the-counter pain reliever that is a stronger version of Cobroxin® and is designed to treat severe chronic pain. In December 2014, we launched Pet Pain-Away, an over-the-counter pain reliever designed to treat pain in cats and dogs.


Basis of Presentation and Consolidation

 

The Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial statementsStatements and notes are presented in accordance with the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and do not contain certain information included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017.2018. In the opinion of management, all adjustments considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included and are of a normal, recurring nature. Interim results are not necessarily indicative of results for a full year. Therefore, the interim Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial statementsStatements should be read in conjunction with the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements and notes thereto contained in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K.


The accompanying Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements include the results of Nutra Pharma and its wholly-owned subsidiaries Designer Diagnostics Inc. and ReceptoPharm (collectively “the Company”, “us”, “we” or “our”). We operate as one reportable segment. All intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated in consolidation.


Reclassification of Prior Year Presentation

Reclassification occurred to certain prior year amounts in order to conform to the current year classifications. The reclassifications have no effect on the reported net loss.

Restatement of Prior Period Presentation

Certain prior period amounts have been restated. Restatements have been made for the three and six months ended June 30, 2018 to correct the change in the fair value of convertible notes and to record a gain on settlement of debt and accounts payable. As a result of these changes, the following occurred:

1.Net loss for the three months ended June 30, 2018 decreased by $19,143 ($0.00 per share) (see table below).
2.Net loss for the six months ended June 30, 2018 decreased by $3,110,017 ($0.00 per share) (see table below).
3.At June 30, 2018, there was no change to total stockholders' deficit but additional paid-in capital and accumulated deficit decreased by $3,110,017.
4.Certain amounts in cash flows from operating activities were updated for the six months ended June 30, 2018, but there was no change to the total net cash used in operating activities in the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows.

  For the Three Months
Ended June 30, 2018
  Amounts
Restated
 Amounts
Previously
Reported
 Adjustments Decrease in Net Loss
Change in fair value of convertible notes and derivatives$(849,376)$(868,519)$19,143
Net effect of restatement on net loss    $19,143

  For the Six Months
Ended June 30, 2018
  Amounts
Restated
 Amounts
Previously
Reported
 Adjustments Decrease in Net Loss
Change in fair value of convertible notes and derivatives$(1,982,864)$(4,344,235)$2,361,371
Gain on settlement of debt and accounts payable 768,323 19,677 748,646
Net effect of restatement on net loss    $3,110,017

Liquidity and Going Concern

 

Our Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements are presented on a going concern basis, which contemplate the realization of assets and satisfaction of liabilities in the normal course of business. We have experienced recurring, significant losses from operations, and have an accumulated deficit of $63,794,408$63,341,492 at SeptemberJune 30, 2018.2019. In addition, we have a significant amount of indebtedness in default, a working capital deficit of $5,324,461$7,622,011 and a stockholders’ deficit of $5,361,923$7,652,158 at SeptemberJune 30, 2018.2019.


There is substantial doubt regarding our ability to continue as a going concern which is contingent upon our ability to secure additional financing, increase ownership equity and attain profitable operations. In addition, our ability to continue as a going concern must be considered in light of the problems, expenses and complications frequently encountered in established markets and the competitive environment in which we operate.


At September 30, 2018, weWe do not have sufficient cash to sustain our operations for a period of twelve months from the next yearissuance date of this report and will require additional financing in order to execute our operating plan and continue as a going concern. Since our sales are not currently adequate to fund our operations, we continue to rely principally on debt and equity funding; however, proceeds from such funding have not been sufficient to execute our business plan. Our plan is to attempt to secure adequate funding until sales of our pain products are adequate to fund our operations. We cannot predict whether additional financing will be available, and/or whether any such funding will be in the form of equity, debt, or another form. In the event that these financing sources do not materialize, or if we are unsuccessful in increasing our revenues and profits, we will be unable to implement our current plans for expansion, repay our obligations as they become due and continue as a going concern.


On September 28, 2018, the United States Securities and Exchange Commission filed a lawsuit in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York against the Company and its CEO and Chairman Rik J. Deitsch, and a consultant to the Company, Sean McManus, alleging violations of the Securities Act, the Exchange Act and rules promulgated thereunder. The Company believes that the SEC complaint contains serious factual inaccuracies. The Company believes that the charges are without merit and intend to defend themselves vigorously.The Company does not believe the SEC investigation could impact Company’s ability to continue as a going concern (See Note 8).


The accompanying Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements do not include any adjustments relating to the recoverability and classification of recorded asset amounts or the amounts and classification of liabilities that might be necessary should we be unable to continue as a going concern.


Impact of COVID-19 on our Operations 

The ramifications of the outbreak of the novel strain of COVID-19, reported to have started in December 2019 and spread globally, are filled with uncertainty and changing quickly. Our operations have continued during the COVID-19 pandemic and we have not had significant disruption. Beginning in June 2020, the Company experienced a delay in retail rollout as a downstream implication of the slowing economy. We also closed our Coral Springs office in effort to save money. During May 2020, we received approval from SBA to fund our request for a PPP loan for $64,895 (See Note 12). During April and June 2020, we obtained a loan in the amount of $154,900 from the SBA under its Economic Injury Disaster Loan assistance program. We intended to use the proceeds primarily for working capital purpose (See Note 12).

The Company is operating in a rapidly changing environment so the extent to which COVID-19 impacts its business, operations and financial results from this point forward will depend on numerous evolving factors that the Company cannot accurately predict. Those factors include the following: the duration and scope of the pandemic; governmental, business and individuals’ actions that have been and continue to be taken in response to the pandemic; and the development of widespread testing or a vaccine.

Use of Estimates

 

The accompanying Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements are prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America which require management to make estimates and assumptions. These estimates and assumptions affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the


5


financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expense. Significant estimates include our ability to continue as going concern, the recoverability of inventories and long-lived assets, andthe recoverability of amounts due from officer, the valuation of stock-based compensation and certain debt and warrant liabilities.liabilities, recognition of loss contingencies and deferred tax valuation allowances. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Changes in facts and circumstances may result in revised estimates, which would be recorded in the period in which they become known.


10 

Revenue Recognitionfrom Contracts with Customers


In May 2014, theOn January 1, 2018, we adopted Financial Accounting StandardsStandard Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting StandardsStandard Codification (“ASC׆ASC”) Topic 606, "Revenue Fromfrom Contracts With Customers, originally effectivewith Customers" ("ASC Topic 606") using the modified retrospective method applied to those contracts which were not completed as of January 1, 2018. The cumulative impact of adopting ASC Topic 606 resulted in no changes to retained earnings at January 1, 2018. The impact to revenue for public business entities with annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016. On August 12, 2015, the FASB issuedthree and six months ended June 30, 2018 was an Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”), Revenue From Contracts With Customers (Topic 606): Deferralincrease of $1,280 and $2,780, respectively, as a result of applying ASC Topic 606 to certain revenues generated through online distributors which are now presented gross as we have control over providing the Effective Date, which deferred the effective date of ASC 606 for one year. ASC 606 provides accounting guidanceproducts related to revenue from contracts with customers. For public business entities, ASC 606 is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2017.such revenues. This new revenue recognition standard (new guidance) has a five-step process: a) Determine whether a contract exists;exists; b) Identify the performance obligations;obligations; c) Determine the transaction price;price; d) Allocate the transaction price;price; and e) Recognize revenue when (or as) performance obligations are satisfied. The Company has evaluated the impact of ASC Topic 606 and determined that there is no change to the Company’sCompany's accounting policies, except for the recording of certain product sales to a distributor, in which a portion of the cash proceeds received is remitted back to the distributor. Under ASC Topic 606, the Company determined that these sales should be recorded on a gross basis.


Adoption of ASC 606, RevenueOur revenues are primarily derived from Contracts with Customers

On January 1, 2018, we adopted ASC 606 using the modified retrospective method applied to those contracts which were not completed as of January 1, 2018. Results for reporting periods beginning January 1, 2018 are presented under ASC 606, while prior period amounts are not adjusted and continue to be reported in accordance with our historic revenue recognition methodology under ASC 605, Revenue Recognition.


The cumulative impact of adopting ASC 606 resulted in no changes to retained earnings at January 1, 2018. The impact to revenuecustomer orders for the nine months ended September 30, 2018 was an increasepurchase of $3,740our products. We recognize revenues as performance obligations are fulfilled upon delivery of products. We record revenues net of promotions and discounts. For certain product sales to a resultdistributor, we record revenue including a portion of applying ASC 606the cash proceeds that is remitted back to certain revenues generated through online distributors which are now presented gross as we have control over providing the products related to such revenues.distributor.

 

For the nine months ended September 30, 2018, the revenue recognized from contracts with customers was $104,323. The impact of adoption of ASC 606 on our unaudited condensed consolidated statement of operations was as follows:

 

 

With

Implementation

of ASC 606

 

Before

Implementation

of ASC 606

 

Effect of

Implementation

Revenue

$

104,323

$

100,583

$

3,740

Costs

 

(58,338)

 

(54,598)

 

3,740

Net effect of ASC 606 implementation

 

 

 

 

$

-

There was no balance sheet impact.


Accounting for Shipping and Handling Costs


We account for shipping and handling as fulfillment activities and record shipping and handling costs incurred in cost of sales.within revenue.


Accounts Receivable and Allowance for Doubtful Accounts


We grant credit without collateral to our customers based on our evaluation of a particular customer’s credit worthiness. Accounts receivable are due 30 days after the issuance of the invoice. In addition, allowances for doubtful accounts are maintained for potential credit losses based on the age of the accounts receivable and the results of periodic credit evaluations of our customers’ financial condition. Accounts receivable are written off after collection efforts have been deemed to be unsuccessful. Accounts written off as uncollectible are deducted from the allowance for doubtful accounts, while subsequent recoveries are netted against the provision for doubtful accounts expense. We generally do not charge interest on accounts receivable. We use third party payment processors and are required to maintain reserve balances, which are included in accounts receivables.


Accounts receivable are stated at estimated net realizable value. Accounts receivable are comprised of balances due from customers net of estimated allowances for uncollectible accounts. Management believes that the receivables are fully collectable. Therefore, no allowance for doubtful account is deemed to be required at June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018.


Inventories


Inventories, which are stated at the lower of average cost or net realizable value, and consist of packaging materials, finished products, and raw venom that is utilized to make the API (active pharmaceutical ingredient). The raw unprocessed venom has an indefinite life for use.


6



The Company regularly reviews inventory quantities on hand. If necessary, it records a provisionnet realizable value adjustment for excess and obsolete inventory based primarily on its estimates of component obsolescence, product demand and production requirements. Write-downs are charged to cost of goods sold. OurWe performed an evaluation of our inventory is carried net of a valuation allowance of $30,885and related accounts at SeptemberJune 30, 20182019 and December 31, 2017.2018, and increased the reserve on supplier advances for future venom purchases included in the prepaid expenses and other current assets by $0 and $47,757, respectively. At June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018, the total valuation allowance for prepaid venom is $200,911.


Financial Instruments and Concentration of Credit Risk


Our financial instruments include cash, accounts receivable, accounts payable, accrued expenses, loans payable, due to officers and derivative financial instruments. Other than certain warrant and convertible instruments (derivative financial instruments) and liabilities to related parties (for which it was impracticable to estimate fair value due to uncertainty as to when they will be satisfied and a lack of similar type transactions in the marketplace), we believe the carrying values of our financial instruments approximate their fair values because they are short term in nature or payable on demand. Our derivative financial instruments are carried at a measured fair value.


11 

Balances in various cash accounts may at times exceed federally insured limits. We have not experienced any losses in such accounts. We do not hold or issue financial instruments for trading purposes. In addition, for the ninethree months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2018,2019, there was one customer that accounted for 27% of the total revenues. For the three months ended June 30, 2018, there was one customer that accounted for 45% of the total revenues. For the six months ended June 30, 2019, there were two customers that accounted for 25% and 49% of the total revenues, respectively. For the six months ended June 30, 2018, there was one customer that accounted for 22% of the total revenues. As of June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018, 100% and 84% of the accounts receivable balance are reserves due from two payment processors.


Operating Lease Right-of-Use Asset and Liability

In February 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2016-02, “Leases” (Topic 842), as amended (“ASC Topic 842”). The new standard establishes a right-of-use (ROU) model that requires a lessee to record a ROU asset and a lease liability on the balance sheet for all leases with terms longer than 12 months and classify as either operating or finance leases. We adopted this standard effective January 1, 2019 using the modified retrospective approach for all leases entered into before the effective date. Adoption of the ASC Topic 842 had a significant effect on our balance sheet resulting in increased non-current assets and increased current and non-current liabilities. There was no impact to retained earnings upon adoption of the new standard. We did not have any finance leases (formerly referred to as capital leases prior to the adoption of ASC Topic 842), therefore there was no change in accounting treatment required. For comparability purposes, the Company will continue to comply with the previous disclosure requirements in accordance with the existing lease guidance and prior periods are not restated.

The Company elected the package of practical expedients as permitted under the transition guidance, which allowed us: (1) to carry forward the historical lease classification; (2) not to reassess whether expired or existing contracts are or contain leases; and, (3) not to reassess the treatment of initial direct costs for existing leases.

In accordance with ASC Topic 842, at the inception of an arrangement, the Company determines whether the arrangement is or contains a lease based on the unique facts and circumstances present and the classification of the lease including whether the contract involves the use of a distinct identified asset, whether we obtain the right to substantially all the economic benefit from the use of the asset, and whether we have the right to direct the use of the asset. Leases with a term greater than one year are recognized on the balance sheet as ROU assets, lease liabilities and, if applicable, long-term lease liabilities. The Company has elected not to recognize on the balance sheet leases with terms of one year or less under practical expedient in paragraph ASC 842-20-25-2.

Lease liabilities and their corresponding ROU assets are recorded based on the present value of lease payments over the expected lease term. The implicit rate within our operating leases are generally not determinable and, therefore, the Company uses the incremental borrowing rate at the lease commencement date to determine the present value of lease payments. The determination of the Company’s incremental borrowing rate requires judgment. The Company determines the incremental borrowing rate for each lease using our estimated borrowing rate.

For periods prior to the adoption of ASC Topic 842, the Company recorded rent expense based on the term of the related lease. The expense recognition for operating leases under ASC Topic 842 is substantially consistent with prior guidance. As a result, there are no significant differences in our results of operations presented.

The impact of the adoption of ASC 842 on the balance sheet was:

  As reported
December 31,
2018
 Adoption of ASC 842 – increase (decrease) Balance January 1,
2019
Operating lease right-of-assets$-$281,175$281,175
Total assets$141,417$281,175$422,592
Operating lease liabilities, current portion$-$64,573$64,573
Operating lease liabilities, net of current portion$-$216,602$216,602
Total liabilities$6,078,010$281,175$6,359,185
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity$141,417$281,175$422,592

12 

Derivative Financial Instruments


Management evaluates all of its financial instruments to determine if such instruments are derivatives or contain features that qualify as embedded derivatives. For derivative financial instruments that are accounted for as liabilities, the derivative instrument is initially recorded at its fair value and is then re-valued at each reporting date, with changes in the fair value reported as charges or credits to income. For option-based simple derivative financial instruments, the Company uses the Black-Scholes option-pricing model to value the derivative instruments at inception and subsequent valuation dates. The classification of derivative instruments, including whether such instruments should be recorded as liabilities or as equity, is re-assessed at the end of each reporting period. Derivative instrument liabilities are classified in the balance sheet as current or non-current based on whether or not net-cash settlement of the derivative instrument could be required within 12 months of the balance sheet date.


We do not use derivative instruments to hedge exposures to cash flow, market, or foreign currency risks.


Convertible Debt


For convertible debt that does not contain an embedded derivative that requires bifurcation, the conversion feature is evaluated to determine if the rate of conversion is below market value and should be categorized as a beneficial conversion feature (“BCF”("BCF").


A BCF related to debt is recorded by the Company as a debt discount and with the offset recorded to equity. The related convertible debt is recorded net of the discount for the BCF. The discount is amortized as additional interest expense over the term of the debt with the resulting debt discount being accreted over the term of the note.


The Fair Value Measurement Option


We have elected the fair value measurement option for convertible debt with embedded derivatives that require bifurcation, and record the entire hybrid financing instrument at fair value under the guidance of FASB ASC Topic 815,Derivatives and Hedging (“ASC Topic 815”). The Company reports interest expense, including accrued interest, related to this convertible debt under the fair value option, within the change in fair value of convertible notes and derivatives in the accompanying consolidated statement of operations.


Property and Equipment and Long-Lived Assets


Property and equipment is recorded at cost. Expenditures for major improvements and additions are added to property and equipment, while replacements, maintenance and repairs which do not extend the useful lives are expensed. Depreciation is computed using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets of 3 – 7 years.


Property and equipment consists of the following at September 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017:


 

 

September 30, 2018

 

December 31, 2017

Computer equipment

$

25,120

$

25,120

Furniture and fixtures

 

34,757

 

34,757

Lab equipment

 

53,711

 

53,711

Telephone equipment

 

12,421

 

12,421

Office equipment – other

 

16,856

 

16,856

Leasehold improvements

 

73,168

 

73,168

Total

 

216,033

 

216,033

Less: Accumulated depreciation

 

(204,428)

 

(199,570)

Property and equipment, net

$

11,605

$

16,463



7



We review our long-lived assets for recoverability if events or changes in circumstances indicate the assets may be impaired. At September 30, 2018, we believe the carrying values of our long-lived assets are recoverable. Depreciation expense for the nine-months ended September 30, 2018 and 2017 was $4,858 and $4,421, respectively, and $1,105 and $1,168 for the three-months ended September 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively.


Income Taxes


We computeThe Company recorded no income taxes in accordance with Financial Accounting Standard Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standard Codification (“ASC”) Topic 740,Income Taxes(“ASC Topic 740”). Under ASC Topic 740, deferred taxes are recognizedtax expense for the six months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018 because the estimated annual effective tax consequencesrate was zero. As of temporary differences by applying enacted statutory rates applicableJune 30, 2019, the Company continues to future years to differences betweenprovide a valuation allowance against its net deferred tax assets since the financial statement carrying amounts and theCompany believes it is more likely than not that its deferred tax bases of existing assets and liabilities. Also, the effect on deferred taxes of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that included the enactment date. Temporary differences between financial and tax reporting arise primarily from the use of different methods to record bad debts and /or sales returns, and inventory reserves.will not be realized.


On an annual basis, we evaluate tax positions that have been taken or are expected to be taken in our tax returns to determine if they are more than likely to be sustained if the taxing authority examines the respective position.  At September 30, 2018, we do not believe we have a need to record any liabilities for uncertain tax positions or provisions for interest or penalties related to such positions.


Since inception, we have been subject to tax by both federal and state taxing authorities. Until the respective statutes of limitations expire (which may be as much as 20 years while we have unused net operation losses), we are subject to income tax audits in the jurisdictions in which we operate. The Company’s 2015 to 2017 tax returns are subject to examination by Internal Revenue Services and State Taxing Agencies.


Stock-Based Compensation


We account for stock-based compensation in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718,Stock Compensation (“(“ASC Topic 718”). ASC Topic 718, which requires that the cost resulting from all share-based transactions be recorded in the financial statements over the respective service periods. It establishes fair value as the measurement objective in accounting for share-based payment arrangements and requires all entities to apply a fair-value-based measurement in accounting for share-based payment transactions with employees. The statement also establishes fair value as the measurement objective for transactions in which an entity acquires goods or services from non-employees in share-based payment transactions.


13 

Net Loss Per Share


Net loss per share is calculated in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 260,Earnings per Share. Basic loss per share is calculated by dividing net loss by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted loss per share is calculated by dividing net loss by the weighted average number of common shares and dilutive common stock equivalents outstanding. During periods in which we incur losses, common stock equivalents, if any, are not considered, as their effect would be anti-dilutive or have no effect on earnings per share. Any common shares issued as of a result of the exercise of stock options and warrants would come from newly issued common shares from our remaining authorized shares. As of SeptemberJune 30, 20182019 and 2017,2018, the following items were not included in dilutive loss as the effect is anti-dilutive:

 

 

September 30,

2018

 

September 30,

2017

Options and warrants

 

12,600,000

 

13,540,000

Convertible notes payable

 

3,260,602,785

 

1,762,604,798

Total

 

3,273,202,785

 

1,776,144,798


  June 30, 2019 June 30, 2018
Options and warrants 118,500,000 13,475,000
Convertible notes payable 7,050,986,979 1,625,457,403
Total 7,169,486,979 1,638,932,403

Recent Accounting Pronouncements


In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02,Leases, which will amend current lease accounting to require lessees to recognize (i) a lease liability, which is a lessee’s obligation to make lease payments arising from a lease, measured on a discounted basis, and (ii) a right-of-use asset, which is an asset that represents the lessee’s right to use, or control the use of, a specified asset for the lease term. ASU 2016-02 does not significantly change lease accounting requirements applicable to lessors; however, certain changes were made to align, where necessary, lessor accounting with the lessee accounting model. This standard will be effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within those fiscal years. We expect the impact of this ASU will result in the recognition of right-of-use assets and related obligations.


In June 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-07, “Compensation - Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Improvements to Nonemployee Share-Based Payment Accounting” (“ASU 2018-07”). ASU No 2018-07 expands the scope of Topic 718 to include share-based payment transactions for acquiring goods and services from nonemployees. The guidance also specifies that Topic 718 applies to all share-based payment transactions in which a grantor acquires goods or services to be used or consumed in a grantor’s own operations by issuing share-based payment awards. This guidance is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within those fiscal years, (quarter ending March 31, 2019and is effective for the Company). Early adoption is permitted, but no earlier than an entity’s adoptionCompany as of January 1, 2019. The Company noted that all share based payments were settled as of the date of Topic 606. The Company will evaluate the effects of adopting ASU 2018-07 if and when it is deemed to be applicable.adoption, so there was no impact on the Company's financial statements.


8


All other newly issued accounting pronouncements but not yet effective have been deemed either immaterial or not applicable.


2.     FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS


Certain assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis at SeptemberJune 30, 20182019 are measured in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 820-10-05,Fair Value Measurements. FASB ASC Topic 820-10-05 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value and expands the disclosure requirements regarding fair value measurements for financial assets and liabilities as well as for non-financial assets and liabilities that are recognized or disclosed at fair value on a recurring basis in the financial statements.


The statement requires fair value measurement be classified and disclosed in one of the following three categories:


Level 1:

Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets that are accessible at the measurement date for identical unrestricted assets or liabilities;

Level 2:

Quoted prices in markets that are not active or inputs which are observable either directly or indirectly for substantially the full term of the asset or liability; and

Level 3:

Prices or valuation techniques that require inputs that are both significant to the fair value measurement and unobservable (i.e. supported by little or no market activity).


The following table summarizes our financial instruments measured at fair value at SeptemberJune 30, 20182019 and December 31, 2017:2018:


 

Fair Value Measurements at September 30, 2018

 Fair Value Measurements at June 30, 2019

Liabilities:

 

Total

 

Level 1

 

Level 2

 

Level 3

 Total Level 1 Level 2 Level 3

Warrant liability

$

1,975

$

-

$

-

$

1,975

$1,934$-$-$1,934

Convertible notes at fair value

$

1,058,968

$

-

$

-

$

1,058,968

$2,821,182$-$-$2,821,182


 

Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2017

 Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2018

Liabilities:

 

Total

 

Level 1

 

Level 2

 

Level 3

 Total Level 1 Level 2 Level 3

Warrant liability

$

5,903

$

-

$

-

$

5,903

$1,468$-$-$1,468

Convertible notes at fair value

$

1,925,959

$

-

$

-

$

1,925,959

$1,156,341$-$-$1,156,341


14 

The following table shows the changes in fair value measurements for the warrant liability using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) during the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20182019 and the year ended December 31, 2017:2018:

 

Description

 

September 30,

2018

 

December 31,

2017

 June 30,
2019
 December 31,
2018

Beginning balance

$

5,903

$

48,504

$1,468$5,903

Purchases, issuances, and settlements

 

-

 

24,017

Day one loss on value of hybrid instrument

 

-

 

-

Total (gain) loss included in earnings (1)

 

(3,928)

 

(66,618)

 466 (4,435)

Ending balance

$

1,975

$

5,903

$1,934$1,468


(1)   The gain related to the revaluation of our warrant liability is included in “Change in fair value of convertible notes and derivatives” in the accompanying consolidated unaudited statement of operations.


We valued our warrants using a Dilution-Adjusted Black-Scholes Model. Assumptions used include (1) 1.76%1.75% to 2.81% risk-free rate, (2) warrant life is the remaining contractual life of the warrants, (3) expected volatility of 229%-245%256%-305% (4) zero expected dividends (5) exercise price set forth in the agreements (6) common stock price of the underlying share on the valuation date, and (7) number of shares to be issued if the instrument is converted.


The following table summarizes assumptions and the significant terms of each of the convertible notes for which the entire hybrid instrument is recorded at fair value at SeptemberJune 30, 20182019 and December 31, 2017:2018:


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Conversion Price – Lower of Fixed Price or Percentage of VWAP for Look–back Period

 

 

Debenture

Issuance Year

 

Face

Amount

 

Interest Rate

 

Default

Interest

Rate

 

Anti–Dilution

Adjusted

Price

 

% of Stock Price for Look-Back Period

 

Look–Back

Period

2018

 

$657,700

 

8%

 

24%

 

$0.0002–$0.20

 

40%–60%

 

3 to 25 Days

2017

 

$682,099

 

8%-12%

 

18%

 

$0.0002-$0.20

 

40%-60%

 

3 to 25 Days

Conversion Price - Lower of Fixed
Price or Percentage of VWAP
for Look-back Period
DebentureFace
Amount
Interest
Rate
Default
Interest
Rate
Discount
Rate
Anti-Dilution
Adjusted
Price
% of stock price for look-back periodLook-back
Period
June 30, 2019$1,066,4798%-20%18%-24%23.95-27.95$0.00015-$0.0550%-60%3 to 25 Days
December 31, 2018$1,566,4338%-12%18%-20%25.95-27.95$0.0002-$0.2040%-60%3 to 25 Days



9



Using the stated assumptions summarized in table above, we calculated the inception date and reporting period fair values of each note issued. The following table shows the changes in fair value measurements for the convertible notes at fair value using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) during the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20182019 and the year ended December 31, 2017 for2018:

Description June 30, 2019 December 31, 2018
Beginning balance$1,156,341$1,925,959
Purchases and issuances 535,779 472,029
Day one loss on value of hybrid instrument (1) 671,476 2,021,041
Loss from change in fair value (1) 732,586 130,344
Gain on settlement - (958,581)
Conversion to common stock (275,000) (2,434,451)
Ending balance$2,821,182$1,156,341

(1)   The losses related to the Convertible Notes:valuation of the convertible notes are included in “Change in fair value of convertible notes and derivatives” in the accompanying consolidated statement of operations.


 

 

September 30,

2018

 

December 31,

2017

Description

 

 

 

 

Beginning balance

$

1,925,959

$

1,672,728

Purchases, issuances, and settlements

 

498,980

 

580,143

Day one loss on value of hybrid instrument

 

2,021,041

 

999,228

Loss from change in fair value

 

2,134,326

 

1,314,325

Conversion to common stock

 

(5,518,338)

 

(2,594,100)

Repayment in cash

 

(3,000)

 

(46,365)

Ending balance

$

1,058,968

$

1,925,959


3.     INVENTORIES


Inventories are valued at the lower of average cost or net realizable value.value on an average cost basis. At SeptemberJune 30, 20182019 and December 31, 2017,2018, inventories were as follows:

  June 30,
2019
 

December 31,

2018

Raw Materials$34,433$33,431
Finished Goods 2,095 1,871
Total Inventories$36,528$35,302


 

 

September 30,

2018

 

December 31,

2017

Raw Materials

$

55,380

$

35,653

Finished Goods

 

17,291

 

15,374

Inventory Reserve

 

(30,885)

 

(30,885)

Total Inventories

$

41,786

$

20,142

15 


4.     PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT

Property and equipment consists of the following at June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018:

  June 30,
2019
 December 31, 2018
Computer equipment$25,120$25,120
Furniture and fixtures 34,757 34,757
Lab equipment 53,711 53,711
Telephone equipment 12,421 12,421
Office equipment – other 16,856 16,856
Leasehold improvements 73,168 73,168
Total 216,033 216,033
Less: Accumulated depreciation (207,743) (205,533)
Property and equipment, net$8,290$10,500

We review our long-lived assets for recoverability if events or changes in circumstances indicate the assets may be impaired. At June 30, 2019, we believe the carrying values of our long-lived assets are recoverable. Depreciation expense for the six-months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018 was $2,210 and $3,753, respectively, and $1,105 and $1,825 for the three-months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018, respectively.

5.     DUE TO/FROM OFFICER


At SeptemberJune 30, 2018,2019, the balance due to our officerPresident and CEO, Rik Deitsch, is $200,437.$161,418, which is an unsecured demand loan that bears interest at 4%. During the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2018,2019, we advanced $141,070repaid $61,715 to and collected $107,100$4,100 from Mr. Deitsch and the Companies owned by him. As of SeptemberAdditionally, accrued interest on the demand loan was $3,536 and is included in the due to officer account.

At December 31, 2018, the balance due to our President and CEO, Rik Deitsch, is $186,497, which is an unsecured demand loan that bears interest at 4%. . During the six months ended June 30, 2018, we recorded a bad debt expenserepaid $106,150 to and collected $105,100 from Mr. Deitsch and the Companies owned by him. Additionally, accrued interest on the demand loan was $7,674 and is included in the due to officer account. The Company has fully reserved receivables from companies owned by the Company's CEO. The reserve was $534,470 and $505,470 as of $498,470 which represents a full valuation allowance for amounts owed by these Companies.June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018.


5.     OTHER INDEBTEDNESS6.     DEBTS


Other indebtedness consistsDebts consist of the following at SeptemberJune 30, 20182019 and December 31, 2017:2018:


  

June 30,

2019

  

December 31,

2018

Note payable– Related Party (Net of discount of $1,200 and $2,400,
respectively) (1)
$13,200 $12,000
Notes payable – Unrelated third parties (Net of discount of $1,000
and $17,870, respectively) (2)
 1,387,877  1,469,690
Convertible notes payable – Unrelated third parties (Net of discount of
$6,710 and $29,371, respectively) (3)
 814,016  751,955
Convertible notes payable, at fair value (Net of discount of $44,694 and $0, respectively)  (4) 2,776,488  1,156,341
Ending balances 4,991,581  3,389,986
Less: Long-term portion-Notes payable-Unrelated third parties$(4,616) $(51,410)
Less: Long-term portion-Convertible Notes payable-Unrelated third parties (119,879)  -
Current portion$4,867,086 $3,338,576

16 

 

 

September 30,

2018

 

 

December 31,

2017

Note payable– Related Party (Net of discount of $0 and $2,000, respectively) (1)

$

12,000

 

$

202,974

Notes payable – Unrelated third parties (Net of discount of $0 and $28,723, respectively) (2)

 

1,484,290

 

 

1,337,470

Convertible notes payable (Net of discount of $61,300 and $0, respectively) (3)

 

1,512,544

 

 

1,925,959

Ending balances

 

3,008,834

 

 

3,466,403

Less: Current portion

 

(2,944,217)

 

 

(3,466,403)

Long-term portion

$

64,617

 

$

-


(1)

(1)During 2010 we borrowed $200,000 from one of our directors. Under the terms of the loan agreement, this loan was expected to be repaid in nine months to a year from the date of the loan along with interest calculated at 10% for the first month plus 12% after 30 days from funding. We are in default regarding this loan. The loan is under personal guarantee by Mr. Deitsch. We repaid principal balance in full as of December 31, 2016. At June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018, we owed this director accrued interest of $150,372 and $141,808. The interest expense for the six-months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018 was $8,564 and $7,611, respectively, and $4,368 and $3,882 for the three-months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018, respectively. 

During 2010 we borrowed $200,000 from one of our directors. Under the terms of the loan agreement, this loan was expected to be repaid in nine months to a year from the date of the loan along with interest calculated at 10% for the first month plus 12% after 30 days from funding. We are in default regarding this loan. The loan is under personal guarantee by Mr. Deitsch. We repaid principal balance in full as of December 31, 2016. At September 30, 2018, we owed this director accrued interest of $137,645, which is included in accrued expenses in the condensed consolidated balance sheets.


In August 2016, we issued two Promissory Notes for a total of $200,000 ($100,000 each) to a company owned by one of our directors. The notes carry interest at 12% annually and were due on the date that was nine-months from the execution and funding of the note. Upon default in February 2017, the Notes became convertible at $0.008 per share. During March 2017, we repaid principal balance of $6,365.  During April 2017, the Notes with accrued interest were restated. The restated principal balance of $201,818 bears interest at 12% annually and was due October 12, 2017. During June 2017, we repaid principal balance of $8,844. The loan is in default and negotiation for settlement. The loan was reclassified to notes payable – unrelated third parties after the director resigned in March 2018. At September 30, 2018, we owed principal balance of $192,974 and accrued interest of $34,196.


In December 2017, we issued a promissory note to a related party in the amount of $12,000 with original issuance discount of $2,000. The note iswas amended in December 2018 with original issuance discount of $2,400 and was due in twelve months from the execution and funding of the note. At SeptemberJune 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018, the principal balance of the loan is $12,000.



(2)

At September 30, 2018, the balance$13,200 and $12,000, net of $1,484,290, consisteddebt discount of the following loans:


·

On August 2, 2011 under a settlement agreement with Liquid Packaging Resources, Inc. (“LPR”), we agreed to pay LPR a total of $350,000 in monthly installments of $50,000 beginning August 15, 2011$1,200 and ending on February 15, 2012. This settlement amount$2,400, respectively. The Note was recorded as general and administrative expenses on the date of the settlement. We did not make the December 2011 or January 2012 payments and on January 26, 2012, we signed the first amendment to the settlement agreement where we agreed to pay $175,000, which was the balance outstanding at December 31, 2011(this includes a $25,000 penalty for non-payment). We repaid $25,000 during the three months ended March 31, 2012. We did not make all of the payments under such amendment and as a result pursuant to the original settlement agreement, LPR had the right to sell 142,858 shares of our free trading stock held in escrow by their attorney and receive cash settlements for a total amount of $450,000 (the initial $350,000 plus total default penalties of $100,000).  The $100,000 penalty was expensed during 2012.  LPR sold the note to Southridge Partners, LLP (“Southridge”) for consideration of $281,772settled in June 2012. In August 2013 the debt of $281,772 reverted back to LPR.2020.


(2)At June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018, the balance of $1,387,877 and $1,469,690 net of discount of $1,000 and $17,870, respectively, consisted of the following loans:

·

·In August 2016, we issued two Promissory Notes for a total of $200,000 ($100,000 each) to a company owned by a former director of the Company. The notes carry interest at 12% annually and were due on the date that was six-months from the execution and funding of the note. Upon default in February 2017, the Notes became convertible at $0.008 per share. During March 2017, we repaid principal balance of $6,365. During April 2017, the Notes with accrued interest were restated. The restated principal balance of $201,818 bears interest at 12% annually and was due October 12, 2017. During June 2017, we repaid principal balance of $8,844. The loan was reclassified to notes payable – unrelated third parties after the director resigned in March 2018. At June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018, we owed principal balance of $169,634 and $192,974, and accrued interest of $45,456 and $40,033, respectively. The principal balance of $101,818 and accrued interest of $21,023 were settled on February 15, 2019 for $104,000 with scheduled payments through May 1, 2020. We recorded a gain on settlement of debt in other income for $18,841. The Company repaid $4,500 during the six months ended June 30, 2019. At June 30, 2019, the balance owed is $99,500 including the accrued interest of $21,023. The remaining principal balance of $91,156 and accrued interest of $24,433 is being disputed in court and negotiation for settlement (See Note 11).

At December 31, 2012, we owed University Centre West Ltd. approximately $55,410 for rent, which was assigned and sold to Southridge and is currently outstanding and carries no interest.

·On August 2, 2011 under a settlement agreement with Liquid Packaging Resources, Inc. (“LPR”), we agreed to pay LPR a total of $350,000 in monthly installments of $50,000 beginning August 15, 2011 and ending on February 15, 2012. This settlement amount was recorded as general and administrative expenses on the date of the settlement. We did not make the December 2011 or January 2012 payments and on January 26, 2012, we signed the first amendment to the settlement agreement where we agreed to pay $175,000, which was the balance outstanding at December 31, 2011(this includes a $25,000 penalty for non-payment). We repaid $25,000 during the three months ended March 31, 2012. We did not make all of the payments under such amendment and as a result pursuant to the original settlement agreement, LPR had the right to sell 142,858 shares (5,714,326 shares pre reverse stock split) of our free trading stock held in escrow by their attorney and receive cash settlements for a total amount of $450,000 (the initial $350,000 plus total default penalties of $100,000). The $100,000 penalty was expensed during 2012. LPR sold the note to Southridge Partners, LLP (“Southridge”) for consideration of $281,772 in June 2012. In August 2013 the debt of $281,772 reverted back to LPR.


·At December 31, 2012, we owed University Centre West Ltd. approximately $55,410 for rent, which was assigned and sold to Southridge is currently outstanding and carries no interest.

·

·In April 2016, we issued a promissory note to an unrelated third party in the amount of $10,000 bearing interest at 10% annually. The note was due in one year from the execution and funding of the note. The note is in default and negotiation of settlement. At June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018, the accrued interest is $3,242 and $2,739.

In April 2016, we issued a promissory note to an unrelated third party in the amount of $10,000 bearing interest at 10% annually. The note was due in one year from the execution and funding of the note. The note is in default and negotiation of settlement. At September 30, 2018, the accrued interest is $2,483.


·

·In May 2016, the Company issued a promissory note to an unrelated third party in the amount of $75,000 bearing monthly interest at a rate of 2%. The note was due in six months from the execution and funding of the note. During April 2017, we accepted the offer of a settlement to issue 5,000,000 common shares as a repayment of $25,000. The note is in default and in negotiation of settlement. At June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018, the outstanding principal balance is $50,000 and accrued interest is $43,834 and $37,801.

·In June 2016, the Company issued a promissory note to an unrelated third party in the amount of $50,000 bearing monthly interest at a rate of 2%. The note was due in six months from the execution and funding of the note. The note is in default and negotiation of settlement. At June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018, the outstanding principal balance is $50,000 and accrued interest is $37,033 and $31,000.

17 

·In August 2016, we issued a promissory note to an unrelated third party in the amount of $150,000 bearing monthly interest at a rate of 2.5%. The note was due in six months from the execution and funding of the note. During April 2017, the note with accrued interest were restated. The restated principal balance of $180,250 bears monthly interest at a rate of 2.5% and was due October 20, 2017. During January 2018, the note with accrued interest were restated. The restated principal balance of $220,506 bears monthly interest at a rate of 2.5% and was due July 12, 2018. In connection with this restated note, we issued 2,000,000 shares of our restricted common stock. We recorded a debt discount in the amount of $2,765 to reflect the value of the common stock as a reduction to the carrying amount of the debt and a corresponding increase to common stock and additional paid-in capital. Amortization for the debt discount for the year ended December 31, 2018 was $2,765. During July 2018, we issued 5,000,000 restricted shares due to the default on repayment of the promissory note of $220,506 restated in January 2018.The shares were valued at fair value of $5,500. During December 2018, the note with accrued interest were restated. The restated principal balance of $282,983 bears monthly interest at a rate of 2.0% and was due June 17, 2019. The note is in default and negotiation of settlement. In connection with this restated note, we issued 10,000,000 shares of our restricted common stock. We recorded a debt discount in the amount of $3,945 to reflect the value of the common stock as a reduction to the carrying amount of the debt and a corresponding increase to common stock and additional paid-in capital. Amortization for the debt discount for the six months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018 was $3,616 and $2,765, respectively. The debt discount at June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018 was $0 and $3,616. At June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018, the principal balance is $282,983, and the accrued interest is $36,977 and $2,830, respectively.

·On September 26, 2016, we issued a promissory note to an unrelated third party in the amount of $75,000 bearing interest at 10% annually. The note was due in one year from the execution and funding of the note. In January 2019, the principal balance of $60,000 and accrued interest of $15,900 was restated in the form of a Convertible Note (See Note 6(4)). The remaining note of $15,000 was assigned to an unrelated third party and is in negotiation of settlement. At June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018, the principal balance is $15,000 and $75,000, and the accrued interest is $1,371 and $17,271, respectively.

·In October 2016, we issued a promissory note to an unrelated third party in the amount of $50,000 bearing monthly interest at a rate of 2%. The note was due in six months from the execution and funding of the note. The note is in default and in negotiation of settlement. At June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018, the accrued interest is $33,333 and $27,300.

·In June 2017, we issued a promissory note to an unrelated third party in the amount of $12,500 bearing interest at 10% annually. The note was due in one year from the execution and funding of the note. The note is in default and in negotiation of settlement. At June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018, the accrued interest is $2,573 and $1,944.

·During July 2017, we received a loan for a total of $200,000 from an unrelated third party. The loan was repaid through scheduled payments through August 2017 along with interest on average 15% annum. We have recorded loan costs in the amount of $5,500 for the loan origination fees paid at inception date. The debt discount was fully amortized as of June 30, 2019. At December 31, 2017, the principal balance of the loan was $191,329 and in negotiation of settlement. During June 2018, the loan was settled for $170,402 with scheduled repayments of approximately $7,000 per month through July 2020. We recorded a gain on settlement of debt in other income for $20,927 in June 2018. The Company repaid $34,976 during 2018 and $13,848 during the six months ended June 30, 2019. At June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018, the principal balance is $121,578 and $135,426.

·In July 2017, we issued a promissory note to an unrelated third party in the amount of $50,000 with original issue discount of $10,000. The note was due in six months from the execution and funding of the note. The original issuance discount was fully amortized as of December 31, 2018. The note is in default and in negotiation of settlement. At June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018, the principal balance of the note is $50,000.

·In September 2017, we issued a promissory note to an unrelated third party in the amount of $36,000 with original issue discount of $6,000. During September 2018 and 2019, the Note was amended with original issuance discount of $6,000 each due in September 2019 and 2020, respectively. The Note was further restated in September 2020. The restated principal balance was $33,000 with the original issuance discount of $3,000 and is due March 2021. The original issue discount is amortized over the term of the loan. Amortization for the debt discount for the six months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018 was $5,000 and $1,500, respectively. The debt discount at June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018 is $2,500 and $6,000. Repayments of $1,500 and $7,000 have been made during 2017 and 2018, respectively. During the six months ended June 30, 2019, repayment of $1,500 has been made. The Note is under personal guarantee by Mr. Deitsch. At June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018, the principal balance of the note is $31,000 and $27,500, net of debt discount of $1,000 and $6,000, respectively. The note is in default and in negotiation of settlement.

18 

·In October 2017, we issued a promissory note to an unrelated third party in the amount of $50,000 with original issuance discount of $10,000. The note was due in six months from the execution and funding of the note. In connection with the issuance of this promissory note, we issued 5,000,000 shares of our restricted common stock. We recorded a debt discount in the amount of $3,200 to reflect the value of the common stock as a reduction to the carrying amount of the debt and a corresponding increase to common stock and additional paid-in capital. At December 31, 2017, the principal balance of the note is $60,000. Debt discount and original issuance discount were fully amortized as of December 31, 2018. During April 2018, we issued a total of 1,000,000 restricted shares to a Note holder due to the default on repayment. The shares were valued at fair value of $1,700. During April 2018, the Note was restated in the amount of $60,000 including the original issuance discount of $10,000 due October 2018. In connection with this restated note, we issued 5,000,000 shares of our restricted common stock. We recorded a debt discount in the amount of $8,678 to reflect the value of the common stock as a reduction to the carrying amount of the debt and a corresponding increase to common stock and additional paid-in capital.  The debt discount and original issuance discount have been fully amortized as of December 31, 2018. During November 2018, the Note was restated in the amount of $60,000 including the original issuance discount of $10,000 due May 2019. In connection with this restated note, we issued 5,000,000 shares of our restricted common stock. We recorded a debt discount in the amount of $2,381 to reflect the value of the common stock as a reduction to the carrying amount of the debt and a corresponding increase to common stock and additional paid-in capital. Pursuant to the restatement of the Note, the Company agreed that the original issuance discount of $10,000 from the April 2018 Note would be paid to the lender upon execution of restated Note in November 2018. The settlement agreement executed in December 2018 provides that 10,000,000 shares are issued due to the late payment. The shares were valued at $3,000. During July 2019, payment of original issuance discount of $10,000 was made. The restated Note in November 2018 and prior notes are all under personal guarantee by Mr. Deitsch. Amortization of debt discount and original issuance discount for the six months ended June 30, 2019 was $1,587 and $6,667. Amortization for the debt discount and original issuance discount was $3,616 and $4,617, respectively for the six months ended June 30, 2018. As of June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018, the amount due is $70,000 and $61,746, net of discount of $0 and $8,254. During January and July 2020, this Note and the Note of $76,076 amended in August 2018(See Note 6(3)) were combined and restated and was due January 2021. The Note is in negotiation of restatement.

·In November 2017, we issued a promissory note to an unrelated third party in the amount of $120,000 with original issuance discount of $20,000. The note was due in six months from the execution and funding of the note. In connection with the issuance of this promissory note, we issued 10,000,000 shares of our restricted common stock. We recorded a debt discount in the amount of $5,600 to reflect the value of the common stock as a reduction to the carrying amount of the debt and a corresponding increase to common stock and additional paid-in capital. The debt discounts were fully amortized as of December 31, 2018. The loan is in default and in negotiation of settlement. 1,500,000 shares of common stocks were issued due to the default of repayments with a fair value of $2,250 in 2018. During March 2020, $50,000 of the Note of $120,000 with original issuance discount of 20,000 originated in November 2017 was settled for 125,000,000 shares. An additional 36,000,000 shares were issued to satisfy the default provision of the original note and 10,000,000 shares were issued along with the restatement. The total fair value of issued stock was $119,700. The remaining balance of $70,000 was restated with additional issuance discount of $14,000. The $84,000 due in September 2020 is in default and negotiation of further settlement. At June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018, the principal balance of the loan is $120,000.

·In November 2017, we issued a promissory note to an unrelated third party in the amount of $18,000 with original issuance discount of $3,000. The note was due in six months from the execution and funding of the note. In connection with the issuance of this promissory note, we issued 5,000,000 shares of our restricted common stock. We recorded a debt discount in the amount of $2,900 to reflect the value of the common stock as a reduction to the carrying amount of the debt and a corresponding increase to common stock and additional paid-in capital. The debt discounts were fully amortized as of December 31, 2018. The note is in default and in negotiation of settlement. 7,000,000 shares of common stock were issued due to the default of repayments with a fair value of $5,600 during 2018. At June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018, the principal balance of the note is $18,000 and the accrued interest is $2,000 and $0, respectively.

(3)At June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018, the balance of $814,016 and $751,955 net of discount of $6,710 and $29,371, respectively, consisted of the following convertible loans:

·On March 19, 2014, we issued two Convertible Debentures in the amount of up to $500,000 each (total $1,000,000) to two non-related parties. The first tranche of $15,000 each (total $30,000) of the funds was received during the first quarter of 2014. The notes carry interest at 8% and were due on March 19, 2018. The note holders have the right to convert the notes into shares of Common Stock at a price of $0.20. During 2018, repayment of $3,000 was made. At December 31, 2018, the principal balance of the note is $27,000 and the accrued interest is $11,412. The two outstanding Notes were settled in connection with issuance of the convertible note in the amount of up to $1,000,000 in February 2019 (See Note 6(4)), as a result, we recorded a gain on settlement of debt in other income for $38,412.

19 

·During July 2016, we issued a convertible note to an unrelated third party in the amount of $50,000 bearing monthly interest at a rate of 2.0% and convertible at $0.05 per share. During January 2017, the Note was restated with principal amount of $56,567 bearing monthly interest rate of 2.5%. The New Note of $56,567 was due on July 26, 2017 and convertible at $0.05 per share. During February 2018, the Notes with accrued interest of $65,600 was restated. The restated principal balance of $65,600 bears monthly interest at a rate of 2.5% and was due August 14, 2018. In connection with this restated note, we issued 1,000,000 shares of our restricted common stock. We recorded a debt discount in the amount of $4,035 to reflect the value of the common stock as a reduction to the carrying amount of the debt and a corresponding increase to common stock and additional paid-in capital. The debt discount was fully amortized as of December 31, 2018. During August 2018, the Notes with accrued interest of $10,476 were restated. The restated principal balance of $76,076 bears monthly interest at a rate of 2.5% and is due February 2019. In connection with this restated note, we issued 5,000,000 shares of our restricted common stock. We recorded a debt discount in the amount of $3,800 to reflect the value of the common stock as a reduction to the carrying amount of the debt and a corresponding increase to common stock and additional paid-in capital. Amortization of debt discount of $2,850 has been recorded as of December 31, 2018. The remaining debt discount of $950 was fully amortized during the three months ended March 31, 2019. The note is under personal guarantee by Mr. Deitsch. At June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018, the convertible note payable was recorded at $76,076 and $75,126, net of discount of $0 and $950, respectively. The accrued interest as of June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018 is $12,150 and $8,177. During January and July 2020, this Note and the Note of $60,000 amended in November 2018(See Note 6(2)) were combined and restated and was due January 2021. The Note is in negotiation of restatement.

·In October 2017, we issued a promissory note to an unrelated third party in the amount of $60,000 with original issuance discount of $10,000. The note was due in six months from the execution and funding of the note. In connection with the issuance of this promissory note, we issued 5,000,000 shares of our restricted common stock. We recorded a debt discount in the amount of $3,300 to reflect the value of the common stock as a reduction to the carrying amount of the debt and a corresponding increase to common stock and additional paid-in capital.  The debt discounts were fully amortized as of June 30, 2019. The loan is in default and in negotiation of settlement. 1,000,000 shares of common stock were issued due to the default of repayments with a fair value of $1,500 during 2018. At June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018, the principal balance of the note is $60,000.

·During January through December 2018, we issued convertible notes payable to the 20 unrelated third parties for a total of $618,250 with original issue discount of $62,950. The notes are due in six months from the execution and funding of each note. The notes are convertible into shares of Company’s common stock at a conversion price ranging from $0.0003 to $0.001 per share. The difference between the conversion price and the fair value of the Company’s common stock on the date of issuance of the convertible notes resulted in a beneficial conversion feature in the amount of $249,113. In addition, upon the issuance of convertible notes, the Company issued 10,250,000 shares of common stock. The Company has recorded a debt discount in the amount of $6,542 to reflect the value of the common stock as a reduction to the carrying amount of the convertible debt and a corresponding increase to common stock and additional paid-in capital. The total discount of $255,655 and original issuance discount of $62,950 was amortized over the term of the debt.  These Notes are in default and in negotiation of settlement.

During the first quarter of 2019, we issued convertible notes payable of $70,000 with original issuance discount of $5,000. The notes were due in six months from the execution and funding of each note. The notes are convertible into shares of Company’s common stock at a conversion price of $0.0005 per share. In addition, upon the note. During April 2017, we accepted the offerissuance of a settlement to issue 5,000,000 common shares as a repayment of $25,000. The note is in default and in negotiation of settlement. At September 30, 2018, the accrued interest is $34,734.


·

In June 2016,convertible notes, the Company issued a promissory note togranted the total of 110,000,000 warrants at an unrelated third party inexercise price of $0.001 per share. The warrants were valued at $8,147 using the amount of $50,000 bearing monthly interest at a rate of 2%. The note was due in six months from the executionBlack-Scholes method and funding of the note. The note is in default and negotiation of settlement. At September 30, 2018, the accrued interest is $27,933.


·

In August 2016, we issued a promissory note to an unrelated third party in the amount of $150,000 bearing monthly interest at a rate of 2.5%. The note was due in six months from the execution and funding of the note. During April 2017, the note with accrued interest were restated. The restated principal balance of $180,250 bears monthly interest at a rate of 2.5% and was due October 20, 2017. During January 2018, the note with accrued interest were restated. The restated principal balance of $220,506 bears monthly interest at a rate of 2.5% and was due July 12, 2018. In connection with this restated note, we issued 2,000,000 shares of our restricted common stock (See Note 6). We recorded as a debt discount in the amount of $2,765 to reflect the value of the common stock as a reduction to the carrying amount of the debt and a corresponding increase to common stock and additional paid-in capital. Amortization for the debt discount for the nine months ended September 30, 2018that was $2,765. The note is in default and negotiation of settlement. During July 2018, we issued 5,000,000 restricted shares due to the default on repayment of the promissory note of $220,506 restated in January 2018 (See Note 6). The shares were valued at fair value of $5,500. At September 30, 2018, the accrued interest is $48,145.


·

On September 26, 2016, we issued a promissory note to an unrelated third party in the amount of $75,000 bearing interest at 10% annually. The note was due in one year from the execution and funding of the note. The note is in default and in negotiation of settlement. At September 30, 2018, the accrued interest is $15,354.


·

In October 2016, we issued a promissory note to an unrelated third party in the amount of $50,000 bearing monthly interest at a rate of 2%. The note was due in six months from the execution and funding of the note. The note is in default and in negotiation of settlement. At September 30, 2018, the accrued interest is $24,233.


·

In June 2017, we issued a promissory note to an unrelated third party in the amount of $12,500 bearing interest at 10% annually. The note was due in one year from the execution and funding of the note. The note is in default and in negotiation of settlement. At September 30, 2018, the accrued interest is $1,625.


·

During July 2017, we received a loan for a total of $200,000 from an unrelated third party. The loan was partially repaid through scheduled payments through August 2017 along with interest on average 15% annum. We have recorded loan costs in the amount of $5,500 for the loan origination fees paid at inception date. The debt discount was fully amortized as of September 30, 2018.  At December 31, 2017, the principal balance of the loan was $191,329 and in negotiation of settlement. During June 2018, the loan was settled for $170,402 with scheduled repayments of approximately $7,000 per month through July 2020. We recorded a gain on settlement of debt in other income for $20,927. The Company repaid $21,769 during the third quarter of 2018. At September 30, 2018, the principal balance is $148,633.



·

In July 2017, we issued a promissory note to an unrelated third party in the amount of $50,000 with original issue discount of $10,000. The note was due in six months from the execution and funding of the note. The original issuance discount was fully amortized as of September 30, 2018. The note is in default and in negotiation of settlement. At September 30, 2018, the principal balance of the note is $50,000.


·

In September 2017, we issued a promissory note to an unrelated third party in the amount of $51,000 with original issue discount of $8,500. The note was due in six months from the execution and funding of the note. The original issuance discount was fully amortized as of September 30, 2018. The Company repaid $8,500 in cash in November 2017. In May 2018, the Noteholder received a total of 187,500,000 shares of our restricted common stock with a fair value of $243,750 in satisfaction of the remaining balance of $42,500.  We recorded a loss on settlement of debt in other expense for $201,250 (See Note 6).


·

In September 2017, we issued a promissory note to an unrelated third party in the amount of $36,000 with original issue discount of $6,000. The note is due in one year from the execution and funding of the note. The original issue discount is amortized over the termlife of the loan. Amortization for the original issuance discount have been fully amortized as of September 30, 2018. Repayments of $1,500notes. The Notes were further restated in December 2019, and $5,000 have been made in 2017August and nine months ended September 30, 2018, respectively. The note is in default and in negotiation of settlement. During September 2018, we issued 5,000,000 restricted shares due to the default on repayment of the promissory note with a fair value of $3,000. At September 30, 2018, the principal balance of the note is $29,500.


·

In October 2017, we issued a promissory note to an unrelated third party in the amount of $50,000 with original issuance discount of $10,000. The note was due in six months from the execution and funding of the note. In connection with the issuance of this promissory note, we issued 5,000,000 shares of our restricted common stock. We recorded a debt discount in the amount of $3,200 to reflect the value of the common stock as a reduction to the carrying amount of the debt and a corresponding increase to common stock and additional paid-in capital.  Amortization for the debt discount and original issuance discount were fully amortized as of September 30, 2018. During April 2018, we issued a total of 1,000,000 restricted shares to a Note holder due to the default on repayment (See Note 6). The shares were valued at fair value of $1,700. Later in April 2018, the Note was restated with principal balance of $60,000 including the original issuance discount of $10,000 due October 2018. In connection with this restated note, we issued 5,000,000 shares of our restricted common stock. We recorded a debt discount in the amount of $8,678 to reflect the value of the common stock as a reduction to the carrying amount of the debt and a corresponding increase to common stock and additional paid-in capital.  The debt discount and original issuance discount have been fully amortized as of September 30, 2018. As of September 30, 2018, the principal balance of the note is $60,000.


·

In October 2017, we issued a promissory note to an unrelated third party in the amount of $60,000 with original issuance discount of $10,000. The note was due in six months from the execution and funding of the note. In connection with the issuance of this promissory note, we issued 5,000,000 shares of our restricted common stock. We recorded a debt discount in the amount of $3,300 to reflect the value of the common stock as a reduction to the carrying amount of the debt and a corresponding increase to common stock and additional paid-in capital.  The debt discounts were fully amortized as of September 30, 2018. The loan is in default and in negotiation of settlement. 1,000,000 shares of common stock were issued due to the default of repayments with a fair value of $1,500 (See Note 6). At September 30, 2018, the principal balance of the note is $60,000.


·

In November 2017, we issued a promissory note to an unrelated third party in the amount of $120,000 with original issuance discount of $20,000. The note was due in six months from the execution and funding of the note. In connection with the issuance of this promissory note, we issued 10,000,000 shares of our restricted common stock. We recorded a debt discount in the amount of $5,600 to reflect the value of the common stock as a reduction to the carrying amount of the debt and a corresponding increase to common stock and additional paid-in capital. The debt discounts were fully amortized as of September 30, 2018. The loan is in default and in negotiation of settlement. 1,500,000 shares of common stock were issued due to the default of repayments with a fair value of $2,250 (See Note 6). At September 30, 2018, the principal balance of the note is $120,000.


·

In November 2017, we issued a promissory note to an unrelated third party in the amount of $18,000 with original issuance discount of $3,000. The note was due in six months from the execution and funding of the note. In connection with the issuance of this promissory note, we issued 5,000,000 shares of our restricted common stock (See Note 6). We recorded a debt discount in the amount of $2,900 to reflect the value of the common stock as a reduction to the carrying amount of the debt and a corresponding increase to common stock and additional paid-in capital. The debt discounts were fully amortized as of September 30, 2018. The note is in default and in negotiation of settlement. 7,000,000 shares of common stock were issued due to the default of repayments with a fair value of $5,600 (See Note 6). At September 30, 2018, the principal balance of the note is $18,000.



·

In December 2017, we issued a promissory note to an unrelated third party in the amount of $60,000 with original issuance discount of $10,000. The note was due in one year from the execution and funding of the note. During August 2018, the Note holder sold the debt of $60,000 to a non-related party. The subsequent note holder received a total of 145,000,000 shares of our restricted common stock with a fair value of $101,500 in satisfaction of the Note of $60,000 in full. We recorded a loss on settlement of debt in other expense for $41,500 (See Note 6). As a result of the conversion of the note, the debt discount has been fully amortized as of September 30, 2018.


(3)

At September 30, 2018, the balance of $1,512,544 net of discount of $61,300, consisted of the following convertible loans:

·

On March 19, 2014, we issued two Convertible Debentures in the amount of up to $500,000 each (total $1,000,000) to two non-related parties. The first tranche of $15,000 each (total $30,000) of the funds was received during the first quarter of 2014. The notes carry interest at 8% and were due on March 19, 2018. The note holders have the right to convert the notes into shares of Common Stock at a price of $0.20. The notes2020. They are in default and in negotiation of settlement. During the three months ended September 30, 2018, repaymentsecond quarter of $3,000 was made. At September 30, 2018, these2019, we restated two convertible notes payable with principal balanceadditional original issue discount of $27,000$6,400 and accrued interest of $11,024, at fair value, was recorded at $77.

·

During December 2015, Mr. Deitsch, assigned $80,000 of his outstanding loan to an unrelated third party in the form of a Convertible Redeemable Note. The note carries interest at 4% and was due on December 7, 2016. The Note reverted back as the promissory note upon maturity date. On June 27, 2017, the Company owed principal balance of $80,000 plus accrued interest of $4,971. The total of $84,971 was assigned and sold to an unrelated third party in the form of a Convertible Redeemable Note (See Note 6(2)). The note carries interest at 8% and was due on June 27, 2018, unless previously converted intoissued 6,000,001 shares of restricted common stock. The Noteholder has the right to convert the note into shares of Common Stock at fifty-five percent (55%) of lowest closing bid prices of our restricted common stock for the twenty trading days preceding the conversion date including the date of receipt of conversion notice. During July and August 2017, the Note holder made conversions of a total of 164,935,000 shares of our restricted common stock satisfying the principal balance of $55,325 with a fair value of $225,143. During February 2018, the Note holder made conversions of a total of 109,876,500 shares of our restricted common stock with a fair value of $156,625$1,800 (See Note 7). The two restated notes were due in satisfactionAugust 2019 and are in default. The total discount of $8,200 was amortized over the term of the remaining principal balancenotes.  

Repayment of $29,646$10,000 was made in full.May 2019.

 

·

On March 31, 2017, we issued a convertible denture in the amount of $80,000 to Coventry Enterprises, LLC (“Coventry”). The note carries interest at 8% and was due on March 30, 2018, unless previously converted into shares of restricted common stock. Coventry has the right to convert the note into shares of Common Stock at a fifty-five percent (55%) of the of the lowest closing bid price of our restricted common stockAmortization for the twenty trading days preceding the conversion date including the date of receipt of conversion notice. During Februarysix months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018 the Noteholder made a conversion of 70,123,500 shares of our restricted common stock with a fair value of $294,885 in satisfaction of a portion of the Note in the amount of $30,854 (See Note 6).

The noteholder soldwas $43,058 and assigned the remaining balance of $49,146 with accrued interest of $3,276 to an unrelated third party in the form of a Convertible Redeemable Note. The note carries interest at 8% and is due on February 13,$144,062. At June 30, 2019 unless previously converted into shares of restricted common stock. The noteholder has the right to convert the note into shares of our restricted common stock at sixty percent of the lowest trading price of our restricted common stock for the twenty-five prior trading days including the conversion date. During April and May 2018, the Note holder made conversions of a total of 65,885,713 shares of our restricted common stock with a fair value of $156,590 in satisfaction of the remaining principal balance of $49,146 and accrued interest in full (See Note 6).

·

On July 18, 2017, we issued a convertible denture in the amount of $150,000 to Coventry. The note carries interest at 8% and was due on July 18, 2018, unless previously converted into shares of restricted common stock. Coventry has the right to convert the note into shares of Common Stock at a fifty-five percent (55%) of the of the lowest closing bid price of our restricted common stock for the twenty trading days preceding the conversion date including the date of receipt of conversion notice. During February 2018, the noteholder sold and assigned the balance of $150,000 with accrued interest of $6,000 to an unrelated third party in the form of a Convertible Redeemable Note. The note carries interest at 8% and is due on February 13, 2019, unless previously converted into shares of restricted common stock. The noteholder has the right to convert the note into shares of our restricted common stock at sixty percent of the lowest trading price of our restricted common stock for the twenty-five prior trading days including the conversion date. During May and June 2018, the Noteholder made conversions of a total of 120,891,284 shares of our restricted common stock with a fair value of $202,292 in partial satisfaction of the note in the amount of $70,000 (See Note 6). During July through September 2018, the Note holder made conversions of a total of 206,988,570 shares of our restricted common stock with a fair value of $182,553 in satisfaction of the remaining principal balance $86,000 and accrued interest in full (See Note 6).

·

On March 28, 2016, we signed an expansion agreement with Brewer and Associates Consulting, LLC (“B+A”) to the original consulting agreement dated on October 15, 2015 for consulting services for twelve months for a monthly fee of $7,000. To relieve our cash obligation of $36,000 per original agreement, we issued three convertible notes for a total of $120,000 which includes the fees due under the original agreement and the new monthly fees due under the expansion agreement. $40,000 and $60,000 of the notes were paid in full as of December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2017, respectively. The remaining balance of $20,000 Notes is in default and negotiation of settlement. The conversion price is equal to 55% of the average of the three lowest volume weighted average prices for the three consecutive trading days immediately prior to but not including the conversion date. At September 30, 2018, the convertible notes payable with principal balance of $20,000, at fair value, were recorded at $32,316.


·

During June 2016, we issued a Convertible Debenture in the amount of $72,000 to an unrelated third party as a result of debt sale. The Note carries interest at 8% and was due on June 20, 2017, unless previously converted into shares of restricted common stock. The convertible note holder has the right to convert the note into shares of Common Stock at fifty-five percent (55%) of the average of the three lowest volume weighted average prices (the VWAP) of our restricted common stock for the fifteen trading days preceding the conversion date. During August 2018, a Note holder received a total of 300,000,000 shares of our restricted common stock in satisfaction of the principal balance of $72,000 with accrued interest in full (See Note 9).


·

During June 2016, the notes, payablenet of $50,000 originating in January 2016 with accrued interest of $4,800 was assigned and sold to an unrelated third party in the form of a Convertible Redeemable Note (See Note 5(2)). The note carries interest at 8% and was due on June 16, 2017, unless previously converted into shares of restricted common stock. The Noteholder has the right to convert the note into shares of Common Stock at fifty-five percent (55%) of the average of the three lowest VWAP prices of our restricted common stock for the fifteen trading days preceding the conversion date. During May 2018, the Note holder made a conversion of 228,000,000 shares of our restricted common stock with a fair value of $319,200 in satisfaction of the principal balance of $54,800 and accrued interest in full (See Note 6).


·

During July 2016, we issued a convertible note to an unrelated third party in the amount of $50,000 bearing monthly interest at a rate of 2.0% and convertible at $0.05 per share. During January 2017, the Note was restated with principal amount of $56,567 bearing monthly interest rate of 2.5%. The New Note of $56,567 was due on July 26, 2017 and convertible at $0.05 per share. During February 2018, the note with accrued interest of $65,600 was restated. The restated principal balance of $65,600 bears monthly interest at a rate of 2.5% and was due August 14, 2018. In connection with this restated note, we issued 1,000,000 shares of our restricted common stock (See Note 6). We recorded a debt discount in the amount of $4,035 to reflect the value of the common stock as a reduction to the carrying amount of the debt and a corresponding increase to common stock and additional paid-in capital. The debt discount was fully amortized as of September 30, 2018. During August 2018, the Notes with accrued interest of $10,476 were restated. The restated principal balance of $76,076 bears monthly interest at a rate of 2.5% and is due February 2019. In connection with this restated note, we issued 5,000,000 shares of our restricted common stock (See Note 6). We recorded a debt discount in the amount of $3,800 to reflect the value of the common stock as a reduction to the carrying amount of the debt and a corresponding increase to common stock and additional paid-in capital. Amortization of debt discount of $950 has been recorded as of September 30, 2018. The note$6,710 and $28,421 is under personal guarantee by Mr. Deitsch. At September 30, 2018, the convertible note payable was recorded at $76,076. The accrued interest as of September 30, 2018 is $2,345.$677,940 and $589,829.


20 

·

(4)At June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018, the balance of $2,821,182 and $1,156,341, respectively, consisted of the following convertible loans:

In April 2017, we issued a Convertible Promissory Note for $33,000 to an unrelated third party. The note carries interest at 12% annually and was due on January 30, 2018. The Holder has the right to convert the loan, beginning on the date which is one hundred eighty (180) days following the date of the Note, into common stock at a price of sixty percent (60%) of the average of the three lowest trading prices of our restricted common stock for the fifteen trading days preceding the conversion date. During October 2017, the Noteholder made the conversions of a total of 50,125,000 of our restricted common stock satisfying the principal balance of $16,040 with a fair value of $35,596. During June 2018, the Note holder made a conversion of 150,000,000 shares of our restricted common stock with a fair value of $180,000 in satisfaction of the remaining principal balance of $16,960 with accrued interest in full (See Note 6).

·During December 2016, we issued a Convertible Debenture to an unrelated third party in the amount of $110,000. The note carries interest at 12% and matured on September 8, 2017. Unless previously converted into shares of restricted common stock, the Note holder has the right to convert the note into shares of Common Stock at a sixty percent (60%) of the lowest trading prices of our restricted common stock for the twenty-five trading days preceding the conversion date. During June and July 2017, the Note holder made conversions of a total of 179,800,000 shares of stock satisfying the principal balance of $63,001 and accrued interest for a fair value of $298,575. At December 31, 2017, the convertible note payable, at fair value, was recorded at $147,314. During February 2018, the remaining balance of $46,999 with accrued interest of $2,820 was assigned and sold to an unrelated third party in the form of a Convertible Redeemable Note. As part of the debt sale, the Company entered into a settlement agreement with the original noteholder for a settlement of a default penalty of the original debt. During February and July, 2018, we issued a total of 105,157,409 shares of our restricted common stock to the original Note holder with a fair value of $147,220. At December 31, 2018, the Company owed additional shares to the original noteholder and recorded an accrual of $32,400 to account for the cost of the shares, and the shares were issued in January 2019 (See Notes 7).


·

During May and October 2017, we issued two Convertible Debentures for a total of $90,000 ($45,000 each) to Labrys. The notes carry interest at 12% and were due on July 19, 2017 and November 3, 2017, respectively, unless previously converted into shares of restricted common stock. Labrys has the right to convert the notes into shares of Common Stock at sixty percent (60%) of the lowest trading price of our restricted common stock for the twenty-five trading days preceding the conversion date. During November 2017, the Note holder made a conversion of 62,059,253 shares of stock satisfying the principal balance of $11,057 and accrued interest for a fair value of $51,732. During February 2018, we issued 45,000,000 shares of our restricted common stock with a fair value of $3,618,244 to Labrys in settlement of the remaining balance of $78,943 and accrued interest in full (See Note 6).


·

During December 2016, we issued a Convertible Debenture to an unrelated third party in the amount of $110,000. The note carries interest at 12% and matured on September 8, 2017. Unless previously converted into shares of restricted common stock, the Note holder has the right to convert the note into shares of Common Stock at a sixty percent (60%) of the lowest trading prices of our restricted common stock for the twenty-five trading days preceding the conversion date. During June and July 2017, the Note holder made conversions of a total of 179,800,000 shares of stock satisfying the principal balance of $63,001 and accrued interest for a fair value of $298,575. During February 2018, the remaining balance of $46,999 with accrued interest of $2,820 was assigned and sold to an unrelated third party in the form of a Convertible Redeemable Note. During February and July, 2018, in connection with the settlement of a default penalty of the original debt, we issued a total of 105,157,409 shares of our restricted common stock to the original Note holder with a fair value of $173,350.



The new note of $49,819 carries interest at 8% and iswas due on February 13, 2019, unless previously converted into shares2019. We have accrued interest at default interest rate of restricted common stock.24% after the note’s maturity date. The Noteholder has the right to convert the note into shares of our restricted common stock at sixty percent of the lowest trading price of our restricted common stock for the twenty-five prior trading days including the conversion date. During September 2018, the Noteholder made a conversions of 52,244,433 shares of our restricted common stock with a fair value of $37,011 in satisfaction of principal balance of $15,000 and accrued interest in full (See Note 6).full. At SeptemberJune 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018, the convertible note payable with principal balance of $34,819, at fair value, was recorded at $58,979.$90,965 and $62,508.


·

During May 2017, we issued a Convertible Debenture in the amount of $64,000 to an unrelated third party. The note carries interest at 8% and was due on May 4, 2018, unless previously converted into shares of restricted common stock. The Note holder has the right to convert the note into shares of Common Stock at a sixty percent (60%) of the lowest trading price of our restricted common stock for the twenty trading days preceding the conversion
·During February 2018, we issued a convertible denture in the amount of $200,000 to an unrelated third party. The note carries interest at 8% and was due in February 2019. We have accrued interest at default interest rate of 24% after the note’s maturity date. During November 2017, the Note holder made a conversion of our restricted common stocks satisfying the principal balance of $856 and penalty of $6,400 for a fair value of $21,399. During February 2018, the remaining balance of $63,144 with accrued interest and penalty of $12,442 was assigned and sold to three unrelated third parties. During June 2018, a Note holder made a conversion of 50,670,000 shares of our restricted common stock with a fair value of $70,938 in satisfaction of the balance of $34,060 plus accrued interest of $6,476 (See Note 6). At September 30, 2018, the remaining principal of $29,381 plus accrued interest of $7,138, at fair value, was recorded at $60,876.


·

During January through September 2018, we issued convertible notes payable to the 14 unrelated third parties for a total of $435,750 with original issue discount of $40,450. The notes are due in six months from the execution and funding of each note. The notes are convertible into shares of Company’s common stock at a conversion price ranging from $0.0003 to $0.001 per share. The difference between the conversion price and the fair value of the Company’s common stock on the date of issuance of the convertible notes, resulted in a beneficial conversion feature in the amount of $246,913. In addition, upon the issuance of convertible notes, the Company issued 1,250,000 shares of common stock (See Note 6). The Company has recorded a debt discount in the amount of $3,087 to reflect the value of the common stock as a reduction to the carrying amount of the convertible debt and a corresponding increase to common stock and additional paid-in capital. The total discount of $250,000 and original issuance discount of $40,450 was amortized over the term of the debt.  Amortization for the nine months ended September 30, 2018 was $232,000. At September 30, 2018, the principal balance of the notes, net of discount of $58, 450 is $377,300.


$99,150 of the above mentioned convertible notes payable to seven of the unrelated third parties with original issue discount of $10,150 are in default and in negotiation of settlement.


·

During February 2018, we issued a convertible denture in the amount of $200,000 to an unrelated third party. The note carries interest at 8% and is due in February 2019, unless previously converted into shares of restricted common stock. The Note holder has the right to convert the note into shares of Common Stock at sixty percent of the lowest trading price of our restricted common stock for the twenty-five trading days including the date of receipt of conversion notice. In connection with the issuance of the convertible note payable, we recorded a day-one derivative loss of $1,646,242. At June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018, the convertible note payable with principal balance of $200,000, at fair value, was recorded at $520,037 and $358,665. The note carries additional $200,000 “Back-end Note” ($100,000 each) with the same terms as the original note.

·During April 2018, $65,000 of one of the $100,000 Back-end Note was funded. The note carries interest at 8% and is due in February 2019. We have accrued interest at default interest rate of 24% after the note’s maturity date. The Note holder has the right to convert the note into shares of Common Stock at sixty percent of the lowest trading price of our restricted common stock for the twenty-five trading days including the date of receipt of conversion notice. In connection with the issuance of the convertible note payable, we recorded a day-one derivative loss of $110,700. At June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018, the convertible note payable, at fair value, was recorded at $169,012 and $115,165.

·During March 2018, we issued a convertible denture in the amount of $60,000 to an unrelated third party. The note carries interest at 8% and was due in March 2019. We have accrued interest at default interest rate of 24% after the note’s maturity date. The Note holder has the right to convert the note into shares of Common Stock at sixty percent of the lowest trading price of our restricted common stock for the twenty-five trading days including the date of receipt of conversion notice. In connection with the issuance of the convertible note payable, we recorded a day-one derivative loss of $48,418. At June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018, the convertible note payable, at fair value, was recorded at $153,556 and $107,329. The note carries an additional “Back-end Note” with the same terms as the original note that enables the lender to lend to us another $60,000.

·During June 2018, the $60,000 Back-end Note was funded. The note carries interest at 8% and is due in March 2019. We have accrued interest at default interest rate of 24% after the note’s maturity date. The Note holder has the right to convert the note into shares of Common Stock at sixty percent of the lowest trading price of our restricted common stock for the twenty-five trading days including the date of receipt of conversion notice. In connection with the issuance of the convertible note payable, we recorded a day-one derivative loss of $68,067. At June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018, the convertible note payable, at fair value, was recorded at $153,556 and $105,334.

21 

·During May 2018, we issued a convertible denture in the amount of $60,000 to an unrelated third party. The note carries interest at 8% and was due in May 2019. We have accrued interest at default interest rate of 24% after the note’s maturity date. The Note holder has the right to convert the note into shares of Common Stock at sixty percent of the lowest trading price of our restricted common stock for the twenty-five trading days including the date of receipt of conversion notice. In connection with the issuance of the convertible note payable, we recorded a day-one derivative loss of $59,257. At June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018, the convertible note payable, at fair value, was recorded at $148,033 and $106,681.

·During August 2018, we issued a convertible denture in the amount of $31,500 to an unrelated third party. The note carries interest at 8% and was due in August 2019. We have accrued interest at default interest rate of 24% after the note’s maturity date. The Note holder has the right to convert the note into shares of Common Stock at sixty percent of the lowest trading price of our restricted common stock for the twenty-five trading days including the date of receipt of conversion notice. In connection with the issuance of the convertible note payable, we recorded a day-one derivative loss of $23,794. At June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018, the convertible note payable, at fair value, was recorded at $75,133 and $55,409.

All of the above convertible notes with principal balance of a total of $511,319 were settled in October 2020 (See Note 12).

·During May 2017, we issued a Convertible Debenture in the amount of $64,000 to an unrelated third party. The note carries interest at 8% and was due on May 4, 2018. We have accrued interest at default interest rate of 20% after the note’s maturity date. The Note holder has the right to convert the note into shares of Common Stock at a sixty percent (60%) of the lowest trading price of our restricted common stock for the twenty trading days preceding the conversion date. During November 2017, the Note holder made a conversion of our restricted common stocks satisfying the principal balance of $856 and penalty of $6,400 for a fair value of $21,399. At December 31, 2017, the convertible note payable, at fair value, was recorded at $185,765. During February 2018, the remaining balance of $63,144 with accrued interest and penalty of $12,442 was assigned and sold to three unrelated third parties. During June 2018, a Note holder made a conversion of 50,670,000 shares of our restricted common stock with a fair value of $70,938 in satisfaction of the balance of $34,060 plus accrued interest of $8,607. At June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018, the remaining principal of $29,381, at fair value, was recorded at $90,948 and $63,315.

·On March 28, 2016, we signed an expansion agreement with Brewer and Associates Consulting, LLC (“B+A”) to the original consulting agreement dated on October 15, 2015 for consulting services for twelve months for a monthly fee of $7,000. To relieve our cash obligation of $36,000 per original agreement, we issued three convertible notes for a total of $120,000 which includes the fees due under the original agreement and the new monthly fees due under the expansion agreement. The $40,000 and $60,000 of the Notes were paid in full as of December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2017, respectively. The remaining balance of $20,000 Notes is in default and negotiation of settlement. We have accrued interest at default interest rate of 20% after the note’s maturity date. The conversion price is equal to 55% of the average of the three lowest volume weighted average prices for the three consecutive trading days immediately prior to but not including the conversion date. At June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018, the convertible notes payable with principal balance of $20,000, at fair value, were recorded at $75,219 and $47,481, respectively.
·During July 2018, we issued a convertible denture in the amount of $50,000 to an unrelated third party. The note carries interest at 8% and is due in July 2019. The Note holder has the right to convert the note into shares of Common Stock at fifty five percent of the average three lowest trading price of our restricted common stock for the fifteen trading days including the date of receipt of conversion notice. In connection with the issuance of the convertible note payable, we recorded a day-one derivative loss of $46,734. At June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018, the convertible note payable, at fair value, was recorded at $130,626 and $96,157.

·During August 2018, we issued a convertible denture in the amount of $20,000 to an unrelated third party. The note carries interest at 8% and is due in August 2019. The Note holder has the right to convert the note into shares of Common Stock at fifty five percent of the average three lowest trading price of our restricted common stock for the fifteen trading days including the date of receipt of conversion notice. In connection with the issuance of the convertible note payable, we recorded a day-one derivative loss of $17,829. At June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018, the convertible note payable, at fair value, was recorded at $52,019 and $38,297.

·During January 2019, the principal balance of $60,000 from a promissory note of $75,000 originated in September 2016 (See Note 6(2)) and accrued interest of $15,900 was restated in the form of a Convertible Note. The new note of $75,900 was due in one year from the restatement of the note. The Noteholder has the right to convert the note into shares of Common Stock at 50% discount to the average trading price of the three lowest closing stock prices for the twenty days prior to the notice of conversion. In connection with the issuance of the convertible note payable, we recorded a day-one derivative loss of $1,646,242.$75,900. At SeptemberJune 30, 2018,2019, the convertible note payable, with principal balance of $200,000 and accrued interest of $10,037, at fair value, was recorded at $338,837.$202,400.

22 

·During February 2019, we issued a convertible promissory note to an unrelated third party in the amount up to $1,000,000 paid upon tranches. The note carries additional $200,000 “Back-end Note” ($100,000 each) withis due two years from the same terms as the original note.


·

During April 2018, $65,000 of oneexecution and funding of the $100,000 Back-end Note was funded.note per tranche. The note carries interest at 8% and is due in February 2019, unless previously converted into shares of restricted common stock. The Note holderNoteholder has the right to convert the note into shares of Common Stock at sixty percenta conversion price of the lowestlower of $0.0005 or 50% discount to the average trading price of our restricted commonthe three lowest closing stock prices for the twenty-five tradingtwenty days includingprior to the datenotice of receiptconversion. The first two tranches of conversion notice.the Note in the amount of $219,879 has been funded as of June 30, 2019. In connection with issuance of the convertible note, the Noteholder agreed to eliminate two outstanding Notes of $27,000 and the accrued interest of $11,412 that were held by the Noteholder’s defunct entities. In connection with the issuance of the convertible note payable, we recorded a day-one derivative loss of $100,700.$335,576. During May and June 2019, the Note holder made conversions of a total of 750,000,000 shares of stock satisfying the principal balance of $100,000 for a fair value of $275,000 (See Note 7). At SeptemberJune 30, 2018,2019, the convertible note payablewith principal balance of $119,879, at fair value, was recorded at $110,122.$319,678.


·

During March 2018,June 2019, we issued a convertible denture in the amount of $60,000promissory note to an unrelated third party.party for $240,000 with original issuance discount of $40,000. The note carries interest at 8%was due one year from the execution and is due in March 2019, unless previously converted intofunding of the notes. In connection with the issuance of this note, we issued 16,000,000 shares of our restricted common stock. The common stock was valued at $4,688 and recorded as a debt discount that was amortized over the life of the note (See Note holder7). The Noteholder has the right to convert the note into shares of Common Stock at sixty percenta conversion price of the lowestlower of $0.0005 or 50% discount to the average trading price of our restricted commonthe three lowest closing stock prices for the twenty-five tradingtwenty days includingprior to the datenotice of receipt of conversion notice.conversion. In connection with the issuance of the convertible note payable, we recorded a day-one derivative loss of $48,418.$240,000. At SeptemberJune 30, 2018,2019, the convertible note payable, at fair value, was recorded at $101,958. The note carries an additional “Back-end Note” with the same terms as the original note that enables the lender to lend to us another $60,000.


·

During June 2018, the $60,000 Back-end Note was funded. The note carries interest at 8% and is due in March 2019, unless previously converted into shares of restricted common stock. $640,000. The Note holder has the right to convert the note into sharesis in default and negotiation of Common Stock at sixty percent of the lowest trading price of our restricted common stock for the twenty-five trading days including the date of receipt of conversion notice. In connection with the issuance of the convertible note payable, we recorded a day-one derivative loss of $68,067. At September 30, 2018, the convertible note payable, at fair value, was recorded at $101,958.settlement



·

During May 2018, we issued a convertible denture in the amount of $60,000 to an unrelated third party. The note carries interest at 8% and is due in May 2019, unless previously converted into shares of restricted common stock. The Note holder has the right to convert the note into shares of Common Stock at sixty percent of the lowest trading price of our restricted common stock for the twenty-five trading days including the date of receipt of conversion notice. In connection with the issuance of the convertible note payable, we recorded a day-one derivative loss of $59,257. At September 30, 2018, the convertible note payable, at fair value, was recorded at $102,612.


·

During August 2018, we issued a convertible denture in the amount of $31,500 to an unrelated third party. The note carries interest at 8% and is due in August 2019, unless previously converted into shares of restricted common stock. The Note holder has the right to convert the note into shares of Common Stock at sixty percent of the lowest trading price of our restricted common stock for the twenty-five trading days including the date of receipt of conversion notice. In connection with the issuance of the convertible note payable, we recorded a day-one derivative loss of $23,794. At September 30, 2018, the convertible note payable, at fair value, was recorded at $54,365.


·

During July 2018, we issued a convertible denture in the amount of $50,000 to an unrelated third party. The note carries interest at 8% and is due in July 2019, unless previously converted into shares of restricted common stock. The Note holder has the right to convert the note into shares of Common Stock at fifty five percent of the average three lowest trading price of our restricted common stock for the fifteen trading days including the date of receipt of conversion notice. In connection with the issuance of the convertible note payable, we recorded a day-one derivative loss of $46,734. At September 30, 2018, the convertible note payable, at fair value, was recorded at $71,298.


·

During August 2018, we issued a convertible denture in the amount of $20,000 to an unrelated third party. The note carries interest at 8% and is due in August 2019, unless previously converted into shares of restricted common stock. The Note holder has the right to convert the note into shares of Common Stock at fifty five percent of the average three lowest trading price of our restricted common stock for the fifteen trading days including the date of receipt of conversion notice. In connection with the issuance of the convertible note payable, we recorded a day-one derivative loss of $17,829. At September 30, 2018, the convertible note payable, at fair value, was recorded at $28,627.


The Company has concluded that the embedded conversion option and several other features embedded in the hybrid debt agreement requires bifurcation and classification as liabilities, at fair value. As an alternative to this accounting, the Company elected to record the entire hybrid financing instrument as a single financial liability and measured at fair value under the guidance of ASC Topic 815.


6.7.     STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT


Authorized Shares


On March 7, 2018, we obtained written consents from stockholders holding a majority of our outstanding voting stock to approve an amendment of the Company’s articles of incorporation, as amended, to increase the number of authorized shares of common stock from 2,000,000,000 to 8,000,000,000.


Common Stock Issued with Indebtednessfor Accrued Expense


InDuring January and February 2018,2019, in connection with four notes payable,the settlement of a default penalty of debt of $110,000 originated in December 2016, we issued a total of 4,250,00081,000,000 shares of our restricted common stock with a fair value of $9,887 (See Note 5).


In April 2018, in connection with a note payable, we issued a total of 5,000,000 shares of our restricted common stock with a fair value of $8,678 (See Note 5).


In August 2018, in connection with a note payable, we issued a total of 5,000,000 shares of our restricted common stock with a fair value of $3,800 (See Note 5).


Common Stock Issued for Conversion of Convertible Debt


During February 2018, a Note holder made conversions of a total of 70,123,500 shares of our restricted common stock with a fair value of $294,885 in satisfaction of the principal balance of $30,854 of an $80,000 Note originated in March 2017 (See Note 5).


During February 2018, a Note holder received 109,876,500 shares of our restricted common stock with a fair value of $156,625 upon conversion of $29,646 of an $84,971 Note originated in June 2017 (See Note 5). During February 2018, a Note holder received 45,000,000 of our restricted common stock with a fair value of $3,618,244 upon conversion of the remaining balance of $78,943 of $90,000 Notes originated in May and October 2017 (See Note 5).


16



During April and May 2018, a Note holder made conversions of a total of 65,885,713 shares of our restricted common stock with a fair value of $156,590 in satisfaction of the remaining principal balance of $49,146 assigned and purchased from a Note originated in March 2017 (See Note 5).


During May and June 2018, a Note holder made conversions of a total of 120,891,284 shares of our restricted common stock with a fair value of $202,292 in satisfaction of the balance of $70,000 of a $156,000 Note assigned and purchased from a Note originated in July 2017 (See Note 5).


During May 2018, a Note holder received a total of 228,000,000 shares of our restricted common stock with a fair value of $319,200 in satisfaction of the remaining principal balance of $54,800 assigned and purchased from a Note originated in June 2016 (See Note 5).


During June 2018, a Note holder made a conversion of 150,000,000 shares of our restricted common stock with a fair value of $180,000 in satisfaction of the remaining principal balance of $16,960 of $33,000 Notes originated in May 2017 (See Note 5).


During June 2018, a Note holder made a conversion of 50,670,000 shares of our restricted common stock with a fair value of $70,938 in satisfaction of the principal balance of $34,060 and accrued interest of $6,476 assigned and purchased from a Note originated in May 2017 (See Note 5).


During July through September 2018, a Note holder made conversions of a total of 206,988,570 shares of our restricted common stock with a fair value of $182,553 in satisfaction of the remaining principal balance $86,000 and accrued interest in full from a Note originated in February 2018(See Note 5).


During September 2018, a Note holder made a conversion of 52,244,433 shares of our restricted common stock with a fair value of $37,011 in satisfaction of principal balance of $15,000 and accrued interest in full from a Note originated in February 2018 (See Note 5).


During August 2018, a Note holder received a total of 300,000,000 shares of our restricted common stock in satisfaction of the principal balance of $72,000 with accrued interest in full for a Note originated in July 2016 (See Note 5).


Common Stock Issued for Conversion of Promissory Note


During May 2018, a Note holder received a total of 187,500,000 shares of our restricted common stock with a fair value of 243,750 in satisfaction of the remaining balance of $42,500 from a Note originated in September 2017 (See Note 5).


During August 2018, a Note holder received a total of 145,000,000 shares of our restricted common stock with a fair value of $101,500 in satisfaction of the Note of $60,000 originated in December 2017 in full.  We recorded a loss on settlement of debt in other expense for $41,500 (See Note 5).


Common Stock Issued for Account Payable


During August 2018, the Company issued a total of 2,800,000 shares of the company’s restricted common stock to settle the outstanding fees of $4,200 with a fair value of $2,800. We recorded a gain on settlement of accounts payable in other expense for $1,400.


Common Stock Issued for Settlement of Default Penalty


During February and July, 2018, in connection with the settlement of a default penalty of debt, we issued a total of 105,157,409 shares of our restricted common stock with a fair value of $173,350$32,400 to the Note holder (See Note 5)6).


Common Stock Issued We had an accrual of $32,400 to account for Default Payments


During April 2018, we issued a total of 1,000,000 restricted shares to a Note holder due to the default on repaymentcost of the promissory note of $50,000 originated in October 2017 (See Note 5). The shares were valued at fair value of $1,700.December 31, 2018.


During April through September, 2018, we issued a total of 26,625,000 restricted shares to 14 Note holders due to the default on repayment of the promissory notes.  The shares were valued at fair value of $23,815 (See Note 5).


Common Stock Issued for Services


During June 2018, the Company signed an agreement with a consultant for investor relation services for twelve months. In connection with the agreement, 100,000,000 shares of the Company’s restricted common stocks were issued. The share wasshares were valued at $0.0012 per share. The Company recorded an equity compensation charge of $40,000$20,000 and $50,000 during the ninethree and six months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2019. The Company recorded an equity compensation charge of $10,000 during the three and six months ended June 30, 2018.

During April 2019, we signed an agreement with a consultant to provide investor relation services for twelve months. In connection with the agreement, 120,000,000 shares of our restricted common stock were issued. The shares were valued at $24,000.

During June 2019, we signed an agreement with a consultant to provide investor relation services for twelve months. In connection with the agreement, 15,000,000 shares of our restricted common stock were issued. The shares were valued at $6,000.

The Company recorded an equity compensation charge of $6,500 during the three and six months ended June 30, 2019. The remaining unrecognized compensation cost of $80,000 related to non-vested equity-based compensation$23,500 will be recognized by the Company over the remaining vestingservice period.


17



Beneficial Conversion FeaturesCommon Stock Issued with Indebtedness


In May 2019, in connection with amendment of two convertible notes payable, we issued a total of 6,000,001 shares of our common stock with a fair value of $1,800 (See Note 6).

In June 2019, in connection with issuance of a convertible notes payable, we issued a total of 16,000,000 shares of our common stock with a fair value of $4,688 (See Note 6).

23 

Common Stock Issued for Conversion of Debt

During January through September 2018,May and June 2019, the Company has recorded beneficial conversion featuresNote holder made conversions of a total of 750,000,000 shares of stock for a fair value of $275,000 satisfying the principal balance of $100,000 of a $219,879 Note originated in the amountFebruary 2019 (See Note 6).

DateNumber ofFair Value of
shares convertedDebt Converted
5/6/2019250,000,000$75,000
5/31/2019250,000,000$100,000
6/6/2019250,000,000$100,000

Common Stock Issued for Debt Modification

During May and June 2019, we issued a total of $246,913 as additional paid-in capital3,500,000 restricted shares to three Note holders due to the difference betweendefault on repayment of the conversion price and theconvertible notes. The shares were valued at fair value of the Company’s common stock on the date of issuance of the convertible notes (See Note 5).$1,050.


7.8.     STOCK WARRANTS


Common Stock Warrants


During March, 2013, the Company issued a total of 65,000 warrants to purchase common stock at an exercise price of $0.01 per share in connection with issuance of a convertible note payable to Coventry. The warrants expired on March 22, 2018.

On September 3, 2013 and September 12, 2013, the Company issued 500,000 and 375,000 warrants, respectively, to purchase common stock at an exercise price of $0.025 and $0.01 per share in connection with issuances of convertible notes payable to Coventry. The warrants expired on September 3, 2018 and September, 12, 2018, respectively.

On March 31, 2017, in connection with the issuance of an $80,000 Note, we granted three-year warrants to purchase an aggregate of 6,000,000 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $0.005 per share. The warrants were valued at their fair value of $1,203 and $977 using the Black-Scholes method on June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018. The warrants expire on March 30, 2020.

On March 3, 2016, in connection with the issuance of a convertible note, we granted five-year warrants to purchase an aggregate of 2,500,000 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $0.03 per share. The warrants were valued at their fair value of $731 and $491 using the Black-Scholes method at June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018. The warrants expire on March 3, 2021.

On April 4, 2016, in connection with the issuance of convertible notes, we granted three-year warrants to purchase an aggregate of 4,000,000 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $0.05 per share. The warrants were valued at their fair value of $0 using the Black-Scholes method at June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018. The warrants expired on April 4, 2019.

During April, 2014, the Company issued a total of 100,000 warrants to purchase common stock at an exercise price of $0.025 per share in connection with issuance of a convertible note payable to Coventry. The warrants were valued at their fair value of $0 using the Black-Scholes method at June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018. The warrants expired on April 9, 2019.

During February 2019, the Company granted the total of 110,000,000 warrants to purchase common stock at an exercise price of $0.001 per share in connection with issuance of three convertible notes. The warrants were valued at $8,147 using the Black-Scholes method and recorded as a debt discount that was amortized over the life of the notes. The warrants expire in August 2019.

24 

A summary of warrants outstanding in conjunction with private placements of common stock were as follows during the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2019 and the year ended December 31, 2018:


 

Number

Of shares

 

Weighted average exercise price

 

Number

Of shares

 Weighted average
exercise price

Balance December 31, 2017

 

13,540,000

$

0.023

 13,540,000$0.023

Exercised

 

(-)

 

-

 - -

Issued

 

-

$

-

 - -

Forfeited

 

(940,000)

 

0.015

 (940,000) 0.015

Balance September 30, 2018

 

12,600,000

$

0.026

Balance December 31, 2018 12,600,000$0.026
Exercised - -
Issued 110,000,000 0.001
Forfeited (4,100,000) 0.021
Balance June 30, 2019 118,500,000$0.01


The following table summarizes information about fixed-price warrants outstanding as of SeptemberJune 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018:


 

 

Exercise Price

 

Weighted

Average

Number

Outstanding

 

Weighted Average Contractual Life

 

Weighted Average Exercise Price

2018

$

0.005-1.00

 

12,600,000

 

1.01 years

$

0.026

  Exercise Price 

Weighted

Average

Number

Outstanding

 Weighted Average
Contractual Life
 Weighted Average Exercise Price
June 30, 2019$0.001-0.03 86,233,702 0.55 years$0.01
December 31, 2018$0.005-0.05 12,600,000 1.11 years$0.026


At SeptemberJune 30, 2018,2019, the aggregate intrinsic value of all warrants outstanding and expected to vest was $0. The intrinsic value of warrant share is the difference between the fair value of our restricted common stock and the exercise price of such warrant share to the extent it is “in-the-money”. Aggregate intrinsic value represents the value that would have been received by the holders of in-the-money warrants had they exercised their warrants on the last trading day of the periodyear and sold the underlying shares at the closing stock price on such day. The intrinsic value calculation is based on the $0.0004, closing stock price of our restricted common stock on SeptemberJune 28, 2018.2019. There were no in-the-money warrants at SeptemberJune 30, 2018.2019.


8.9.     ACCRUED EXPENSES

Accrued expenses consisted of the following:

  June 30,
2019
 December 31, 2018
Accrued consulting fees$192,050$161,550
Accrued settlement expenses 315,000 347,400
Accrued payroll taxes 144,093 120,182
Accrued interest 217,972 180,509
Accrue others 18,833 22,208
Total$887,948$831,849

10.     PREPAID EXPENSES AND OTHER CURRENT ASSETS

Prepaid expenses and other current assets consist of the following:

  June 30,
2019
 December 31,
2018
Supplier advances for future purchases$221,759$200,911
Reserve for supplier advances (200,911) (200,911)
Net supplier advances 20,848 -
Prepaid professional fees - 13,000
Deferred stock compensation 23,500 50,000
Total$44,348$63,000

25 

We performed an evaluation of our inventory and related accounts at June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018, and increased the reserve on supplier advances for future venom purchases by $0 and $47,757, respectively. At June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018, the total valuation allowance for prepaid venom is $200,911.

11.     COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES


Operating Leases


In February 2013, we entered into a three-year operating lease for monthly payments of approximately $3,500 which expired in January 2016. In February 2016, we entered into a newour current three-year operating lease for monthly payments of approximately $3,200 which expiresexpired in February 2019. The lease is currently month-to-month, thus classified as short-term and not reported on the balance sheet under ASC 842.

ReceptoPharm leases a lab and renewed its operating lease agreement for five years in July of 2012. The lease requiresbeginning August 1, 2017 for monthly payments of approximately $6,400 from August 1, 2012 through August 1, 2017. The lease was renewed in February 2016 for another five years beginning August 1, 2017.$6,900 with a 5% increase each year.


  June 30,
2019
Lease cost  
Operating lease cost$29,288
Short-term lease cost 33,776
Total lease cost$63,064
   
Balance sheet information  
Operating ROU Assets$251,887
   
Operating lease obligations, current portion 68,806
Operating lease obligations, non-current portion 181,379
   Total operating lease obligations$250,185
   
Weighted average remaining lease term (in years) – operating leases 3.17
Weighted average discount rate-operating leases 8%
   
Supplemental cash flow information related to leases were as follows, for the six months ended June 30, 2019:  
   
Cash paid for amounts included in the measurement of operating lease liabilities$46,211

Future minimum payments under these lease agreements are as follows:


 

Total

2018 (nine months)

$

31,623

2019

 

91,913

June 30, Total

2020

 

87,991

$86,345

2021

 

91,379

 89,651

2022

 

54,490

 93,122

$

357,396

2023 15,567
Total future lease payments$284,685
Less imputed interest 34,500
Total$250,185


Rent expense for the three-months ended September 30, 2018 and 2017 $25,166 and $31,867, respectively. Rent expense for the nine-months ended September 30, 2018 and 2017 approximated $92,968 and $92,552, respectively.  


18



Consulting Agreements


During July 2015, we signed an agreement with a company to provide for consulting services for five years. In connection with the agreement, 500,000 shares of our restricted common stock and a one year 8% note of $50,000 were granted. The shares were valued at $0.18 per share. TheAs the services provided were in dispute, the shares and note payable have not been issued as of SeptemberJune 30, 2018.2019. We have accrued the $142,500 in accrued expense as of June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018.

26 

During October 2015, the Company signed an agreement with a consultant for consulting services for a year. In connection with the agreement, 2,500,000 shares of the Company’s restricted common stock were granted and the Company was to make monthly cash payments of $3,000. As of December 31, 2016, the Company recorded an equity compensation.compensation charge of $31,750, however, only 1,000,000 of the shares have been issued. As of June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018, $19,150 has been recorded in accrued expense to account for the 1,500,000 shares of common stock that have not been issued.


Litigation


Patricia Meding, et. al. v. ReceptoPharm, Inc. f/k/a Receptogen, Inc.


On June 1, 2015, ReceptoPharm entered into a settlement agreement with Patricia Meding, a former officer and shareholder of ReceptoPharm.  The settlement relates to a lawsuit filed by Ms. Meding against ReceptoPharm (Patricia Meding, et. al. v. ReceptoPharm, Inc. f/k/a Receptogen, Inc., Index No.: 18247/06, New York Supreme Court, Queens County) in which she claimed to own certain shares of ReceptoPharm stock and claimed to be owed amounts on a series of promissory notes allegedly executed in 2001 and 2002.

 

The settlement agreement executed on June 1, 2015 provides that ReceptoPharm will pay Ms. Meding a total of $360,000 over 35 months. The first payment of $20,000 was made on July 1, 2015. A second payment of $20,000 was made on August 17, 2015 with 32 subsequent monthly $10,000 payments due on the 15th of every month thereafter. To date, ReceptoPharm has made all monthly payments due under the agreement.  In the event of default on any of the payments due under the settlement agreement, the settlement amount would increase by an additional $200,000.  As of September 30,December 31, 2018, all payments were made and the settlement is concluded. We have recorded $200,000 in lossgain on settlement of debt net foron the over accrualconsolidated statements of defaultoperations upon payments in full in April 2018.


Liquid Packaging Resources, Inc. v. Nutra Pharma Corp. and Erik “Rik” Deitsch


On April 21, 2011, Nutra Pharma Corp. and its CEO, Erik Deitsch, were named as defendants in Liquid Packaging Resources, Inc. v. Nutra Pharma Corp. and Erik “Rik” Deitsch, Superior Court of Fulton County, Georgia, Civil Action No. 2011–CV–199562. Liquid Packaging Resources, Inc. (“LPR”) claimed that Nutra Pharma Corp. and Mr. Deitsch, directly or through other companies, placed orders with LPR that required LPR to purchase components from third parties. LPR sought reimbursement for those third party expenses in the amount of not less than $359,826.85 plus interest. LPR also sought punitive damages in the amount of not less than $500,000 and attorney's fees.

Mr. Deitsch and Nutra Pharma Corp. then removed the action to the United States District Court, Northern District of Georgia, Civil Action No. 11–CV–01663–ODE. After removal, LPR amended the Complaint to assert that Nutra Pharma Corp. and Mr. Deitsch were the alter egos of the alleged other companies through whom the subject orders were placed and therefore should be considered one and the same.

At LPR's request, the parties mediated the dispute. At the mediation, the parties worked out an agreement whereby Nutra Pharma Corp. would purchase from LPR the components LPR purchased from third parties at an amount slightly less than the principal amount of the suit and on terms acceptable to us. The agreed price was $350,000 payable over 7 months in equal $50,000 amounts. The litigation was dismissed in August of 2011.  Following several payments under the parties’ agreement, the parties entered into two amended payment schedules as accommodations to Nutra Pharma Corp. to allow it to make payments that had been missed.  Nutra Pharma Corp. did not make a payment in March 2012 and LPR subsequently called Nutra Pharma Corp. in default of the parties’ agreement. 

On June 11, 2012, LPR sold its debt to Southridge Partners, LLP in an agreement to be paid out over time. In August 2013, LPR cancelled their agreement with Southridge Partners, LLP.  LPR filed a notice of intent to administratively dissolve in May 2015 (with the dissolution becoming effective in December 2015) and has not pursued its claimed default against Nutra Pharma Corp. in any court or other formal proceeding since that date.


Paul Reid et al. v. Nutra Pharma Corp. et al.

 

On August 26, 2016, certain of former ReceptoPharm employees and a former ReceptoPharm consultant filed a lawsuit in the 17th Judicial Circuit in and for Broward County, Florida (Case No. CACE16–015834) against Nutra Pharma and Receptopharm to recover $315,000 allegedly owing to them under a settlement agreement reached in an involuntary bankruptcy action that was brought by the same individuals in 2012 and for payment of unpaid wages/breach of written debt confirms.  On September 28, 2016, Nutra Pharma and Receptopharm filed a motion to dismiss the lawsuit. 

 

Nutra Pharma and Receptopharm believe that the lawsuit is without merit, and also intend to file a counterclaim againstespecially in light of gross misconduct by these former employees/consultants for misconductemployees that Nutra Pharmawas discovered after execution of the aforementioned settlement agreement. We intend to vigorously contest this matter.


19



On October 26, 2017,9, 2020, the Court dismissedentered an Order denying the claimsplaintiffs’ motion for unpaid wages/breachsummary judgment with respect to Count I of written debt confirms but allowed the claim forComplaint (for alleged breach of the aforementioned settlement agreementagreement), and the parties continue to go forward.  Sinceengage in discovery regarding their respective claims and defenses. The case is currently set for trial during the Petitioners can only reinforceperiod from May 10, 2021 to May 28, 2021, but it is unclear at this time with the settlement amount due to passingongoing COVID-19 pandemic (and the resultant cessation of statute of limitation, we have accruedjury trials in Broward County) whether the settlement for $315,000 and recorded the gain on settlement of $770,968 in other income for the year ended December 31, 2015. The accrued balance for the settlement has not changed as of September 30, 2018.trial will proceed at that time.


Get Credit Healthy, Inc. v. Nutra Pharma Corp. and Rik Deitsch, Case No. CACE 18-017055


On August 1, 2018, Get Credit Healthy, Inc. filed a lawsuit against Nutra Pharma Corp.the Company and Rik Deitsch (collectively the “Defendants”) in the 17th Judicial Circuit Court in and for Broward County, Florida (Case No. CACE 18-017055) to recover $100,000 allegedly owed under an amended promissory note dated April 12, 2017. On September 10, 2018, the Defendants filed their Answer and Affirmative Defenses to the Complaint. The Defendants believe that the lawsuit is without merit and that they have a number of valid defenses to this claim. Among other things, the majority owner of Get Credit Healthy, Inc. violated the terms of a Binding Memorandum of Understanding by failing to invest in Nutra Pharma Corp. and fraudulently inducing Defendants to enter into the subject amended promissory note. Defendants plan on filed a third-party complaint against the majority owner of Get Credit Healthy, Inc. for his misrepresentations and to vigorously contest this matter. Counsel for Get Credit Healthy, Inc. has requested an early mediation conference in an attempt to resolve our dispute. We agreed to this request, (in large part because we will be required to mediate the lawsuit prior to trial under the applicable local rules), but as of yet, noand mediation date has been set.took place on February 15, 2019.  At September 30,December 31, 2018, we owed principal balance of $101,818 and accrued interest of $17,944$21,023. At mediation, Get Credit Healthy, Inc. claimed that the individual that breached the binding memorandum of understanding with the Company was never an owner of Get Credit Healthy, Inc., but rather, a close friend that encouraged Get Credit Healthy, Inc. to make the subject loan to the Company ultimately, the parties were able to reach a Confidential Settlement Agreement to resolve the dispute, and an Agreed Order was entered dismissing the lawsuit. The lawsuit was settled on February 15, 2019 for $104,000 with scheduled payments. The repayments were made in full as of November 2020 (See Note 5)6).


27 

CSA 8411, LLC v. Nutra Pharma Corp., Case No. CACE 18-023150


On October 12, 2018, CSA 8411, LLC filed a lawsuit against Nutra Pharma Corp. (“Defendant”)the Company in the 17th Judicial Circuit Court in and for Broward County, Florida (Case No. CACE 18-023150) to recover $100,000.00$100,000 allegedly owed under an amended promissory note dated April 12, 2017. On November 1, 2018, the DefendantsCompany filed theirits Answer and Affirmative Defenses to the Complaint. Notably, CSA 8411, LLC is owned by the same individual that is the majority owner of Get Credit Healthy, Inc. DefendantThe Company believes that this lawsuit just like the lawsuit filed by Get Credit Healthy, Inc., is without merit. Moreover, Defendantthe Company believes that it has a number of valid defenses to this claim. Among other things, the owner of CSA 8411, LLC violated the terms of a Binding Memorandum of Understanding by failing to invest in Nutra Pharma Corp.the Company and fraudulently inducing Defendantthe Company to enter into the subject amended promissory note. Defendant intendsnote (contrary to file a third-party complaint against the Get Credit Healthy lawsuit discussed above, we are certain that this individual is the majority owner of CSA 8411, LLC for his misrepresentations and to vigorously contest this matter. As of yet,LLC).  Opposing counsel for CSA 8411, LLC has not reached out to us to set mediation. However, given the fact that the claims at issue involve the same underlying facts as the claims at issue in the lawsuit filed by Get Credit Healthy, Inc., we anticipate that both matters will beschedule mediation, and mediation was set for June 21, 2019 in Plantation, FL however the mediation at the same time.was unsuccessful.  At SeptemberJune 30, 2018,2019, we owed principal balance of $91,156 and accrued interest of $16,253$24,433 (See Note 5).6) if the defenses and our new claims are deemed to be of no merit.


The Company also filed affirmative claims against the Plaintiff, its owner Dan Oran and several relate entities. The case has not been set for trial as of this date.

Securities and Exchange Commission v. Nutra Pharma Corporation, Erik Deitsch, and Sean Peter McManus


On September 28, 2018, the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) filed a lawsuit in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York (Case No. 2:18-cv-05459) against Nutra Pharma,the Company, Mr. Deitsch, and Mr. McManus. The lawsuit alleges that, from July 2013 through June 2018, Nutra Pharmathe Company and the other defendantsdefendants’ defrauded investors by making materially false and misleading statements about Nutra Pharmathe Company and violated anti-fraud and other securities laws.


The violations alleged against Nutra Pharmathe Company by the SEC include: (a) raising over $920,000 in at least two private placement offerings for which Nutra Pharmathe Company failed to file required registration statements with the SEC; (b) issuing a series of materially false or misleading press releases; (c) making false statements in at least one Form 10-Q; and (d) failing to make required public filings with the SEC to disclose Nutra Pharma’sthe Company’s issuance of millions of shares of stock. The lawsuit makes additional allegations against Mr. McManus and Mr. Deitsch, including that Mr. McManus acted as a broker without SEC registration and defrauded at least one investor by making false statements about Nutra Pharma,the Company, that Mr. Deitsch engaged in manipulative trades of Nutra Pharma’sthe Company’s stock by offering to pay more for shares he was purchasing than the amount the seller was willing to take, and that Mr. Deitsch failed to make required public filings with the SEC. The lawsuit seeks both injunctive and monetary relief.


On May 29, 2019 (following each of the defendants filing motions to dismiss), the SEC filed a First Amended Complaint which generally alleged the same conduct as its original Complaint, but accounted for certain guidance provided by the United States Supreme Court in a case that had been recently decided. Each of the defendants then moved to dismiss the SEC’s First Amended Complaint. On March 31, 2020, the Court entered an Order granting in part and denying in part the various motions to dismiss. Following that Order, the SEC filed a Second Amended Complaint (the operative pleading) and the defendants have filed their answers which generally deny liability. At this time, discovery is closed and the SEC has indicated an intent to file a summary judgment motion regarding certain non-fraud claims asserted in its Second Amended Complaint. The defendants have opposed the SEC’s request to file such motion(s). The Court conducted a hearing on February 23, 2021 and set an initial briefing schedule for the SEC’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment wherein the Plaintiffs’ Motion for Partial Summary Judgment was due on April 5, 2021, the Defendants’ Consolidated (i.e., collectively, Nutra Pharma Corporation, Erik “Rik” Deitsch, and Sean McManus) Response Brief to the SEC’s Motion is due May 3, 2021, and the Plaintiffs’ Reply Brief is due on May 19, 2021.  On March 23, 2021, the Plaintiff filed a Motion for Extension of Time to file the Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. On March 24, 2021, the Court entered an order granting the Motion for Extension of Time and modified the briefing schedule as follows: Plaintiffs’ Motion is due on or before April 9, 2021, the Defendants’ Response is due on or before May 7, 2021, and the Plaintiffs’ Reply is due on or before May 21, 2021. The Company disputes the allegations in this lawsuit and intendscontinues to vigorously defend against the lawsuit. Nutra Pharma is informed bySEC’s claims. Mr. Deitsch and Mr. McManus that they also intend to dohave similarly defended the same. Nutra Pharmalawsuit since its filing and each contest liability. The Company does not believe that it engaged in any fraudulent activity or made any material misrepresentations concerning Nutra Pharmathe Company and/or its products.


28 

9.

12.     SUBSEQUENT EVENTS


Convertible Notes Payable and Common Stock issued with Debt


During October 2018, we issuedThe convertible promissory notes to an unrelated third parties for $40,000a total of $55,000 with original issuance discount of $8,000.$5,000 issued in February 2019 were due in August 2019. During December 2019, $22,000 of the Note was amended to extend the maturity date to June 2020. During August 2020, $38,500 of the Notes was amended with additional original issuance discount of $7,550 due February 2021. During October 2020, $16,500 of the Notes was amended with additional original issuance discount of $1,650 due April 2021.The Noteholders have the right to convert the note into shares of Common Stock at a conversion price of $0.0005. In connection with the issuance of amended convertible notes, the Company granted the following warrants at an exercise price of $0.001 per share. The warrants were valued using the Black-Scholes method and recorded as a debt discount that was amortized over the life of the notes. No warrants have been exercised.

Month of IssuanceNumber ofFair Value ofMonth of Expiration
WarrantsWarrants
December, 201944,000,0007,370August, 2020
August, 202092,100,00022,879August, 2021
October, 202039,930,0009,497October, 2022

During January 2020 through February 2020, the Note holder received a total of 500,000,000 shares of our restricted common stock in satisfaction the $175,000 of the Note originated in February 2019 with a fair value of $425,000. . During February through March 2021, the Note holder received a total of 205,080,000 shares of our restricted common stock in satisfaction the $102,540 of the Note with a fair value of $2,100,612. The remaining balance of $19,373 is due September 2022.

DateNumber ofFair Value of
shares convertedDebt Converted
1/21/2020250,000,000150,000
2/18/2020250,000,000275,000
2/25/2021137,700,0001,500,930
3/3/202167,380,000599,682

During November 2019, we issued a convertible promissory note to an unrelated third party for $137,500 with original issuance discount of $12,500. The note iswas due in six months from the execution and funding of the note. In connectionnotes. The Noteholder had the right to convert the note into shares of Common Stock at a fixed conversion price of $0.000275. The Note is in default and negotiation of settlement.

During December 2019, we issued a convertible promissory note to an unrelated third party for $22,000 with original issuance discount of $2,000. The note was due six months from the execution and funding of the notes. The Noteholder had the right to convert the note into shares of Common Stock at a fixed conversion price of $0.0002. The difference between the conversion price and the fair value of the Company’s common stock on the date of issuance of the note,convertible notes resulted in a beneficial conversion feature (BCF) in the amount of $20,000. The BCF was recorded as a debt discount that was amortized over the life of the notes. The Note is in default and negotiation of settlement.

During January and March 2020, we issued convertible promissory notes to an unrelated third party for a total 6,000,000 shares of our restricted common stock.$68,750 with original issuance discount of $6,250. The Noteholder has the right to convert the note into shares of Common Stock at $0.0005a fixed conversion price of $0.0005. The difference between the conversion price and the fair value of the Company’s common stock on the date of issuance of the convertible notes resulted in a BCF in the amount of $5,500. The BCF was recorded as a debt discount that was amortized over the life of the notes. The Notes were due in January and March 2021. The Notes are in default and negotiation of settlement.

During February and March 2020, we issued convertible promissory notes to an unrelated third party for a total of $22,000 with original issuance discount of $2,000. The notes were due six months from the execution and funding of the notes. The Noteholder had the right to convert the note into shares of Common Stock at a fixed conversion price of $0.0003. The difference between the conversion price and the fair value of the Company’s common stock on the date of issuance of the convertible notes resulted in a BCF in the amount of $20,000. The BCF was recorded as a debt discount that was amortized over the life of the notes. The Notes are in default and negotiation of settlement.

29 

During March 2020, we issued a convertible promissory note to an unrelated third party for $5,500 with original issuance discount of $500. The note was due six months from the execution and funding of the notes. The Noteholder had the right to convert the note into shares of Common Stock at a fixed conversion price of $0.0002. The difference between the conversion price and the fair value of the Company’s common stock on the date of issuance of the convertible notes resulted in a BCF in the amount of $5,000. The BCF was recorded as a debt discount that was amortized over the life of the notes. The Note is in default and negotiation of settlement.

During March 2020, we issued a convertible promissory note to an unrelated third party for $5,500 with original issuance discount of $500. The note was due six months from the execution and funding of the notes. The Noteholder had the right to convert the note into shares of Common Stock at a fixed conversion price of $0.0005. The difference between the conversion price and the fair value of the Company’s common stock on the date of issuance of the convertible notes resulted in a BCF in the amount of $3,300. The BCF was recorded as a debt discount that was amortized over the life of the notes. The Note is in default and negotiation of settlement.

During August 2020, we issued a convertible promissory note to an unrelated third party for a $22,000 with original issuance discount of $2,000. The Noteholder has the right to convert the note into shares of Common Stock at a fixed conversion price of $0.0005. The difference between the conversion price and the fair value of the Company’s common stock on the date of issuance of the convertible notes resulted in a BCF in the amount of $13,200. The BCF was recorded as a debt discount that was amortized over the life of the notes. The note is due August 2021.

During July 2020, we issued a convertible promissory note to an unrelated third party for $20,900 with original issuance discount of $1,900. The Noteholder has the right to convert the note into shares of Common Stock at a fixed conversion price of $0.00052. The difference between the conversion price and the fair value of the Company’s common stock on the date of issuance of the convertible notes resulted in a BCF in the amount of $15,273. The BCF was recorded as a debt discount that was amortized over the life of the notes. The note was due January 2021. The Note is in default and negotiation of settlement.

During August 2020, we issued convertible promissory notes to an unrelated third party for $5,500 with original issuance discount of $500. The Noteholder has the right to convert the note into shares of Common Stock at a fixed conversion price of $0.0005. The difference between the conversion price and the fair value of the Company’s common stock on the date of issuance of the convertible notes resulted in a BCF in the amount of $1,100. The BCF was recorded as a debt discount that was amortized over the life of the notes. The note was due February 2021. The Note is in default and negotiation of settlement.

During November 2020, the Note holder assigned $20,000 of the $75,900 convertible note restated in January 2019 to a third party. The third party subsequently received a total of 100,000,000 shares of our restricted common stock in satisfaction the $20,000 of the Note with a fair value of $120,000. At December 31, 2020, the balance of $55,900 remains outstanding. The note was due January 2021. The Note is in default and negotiation of settlement.

PPP Loan

During May 2020, we entered into a long-term loan agreement with the U. S. Small Business Administration for a Payroll Protection Program (PPP) loan, for $64,895 with an annual interest rate of one percent (1%), with a term of twenty-four (24) months, whereby a portion of the loan proceeds have been used for certain labor costs, office rent costs and utilities, which may be subject to a loan forgiveness, pursuant to the terms of the SBA/PPP program.

Economic Injury Disaster Loan

During April and June 2020, the Company executed the standard loan documents required for securing a loan from the SBA under its Economic Injury Disaster Loan assistance program (the “EIDL Loan”) considering the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the Company’s business. Pursuant to the Loan Authorization and Agreement (the “SBA Loan Agreement”), the principal amount of the EIDL Loan was $154,900, with proceeds to be used for working capital purposes. Interest accrues at the rate of 3.75% per share.annum. Installment payments, including principal and interest, are due twelve months from the date of the SBA Loan Agreement in the amount of $731. The balance of principal and interest is payable over a 360 month period from the date of the SBA Loan Agreement. In connection therewith, the Company received a $5,000 advance, which does not have to be repaid. The SBA requires that the Company collateralize the loan to the maximum extent up to the loan amount. If business fixed assets do not “fully secure” the loan the lender may include trading assets (using 10% of current book value for the calculation), and must take available equity in the personal real estate (residential and investment) of the principals as collateral.



30 

Restatement of Promissory Notes

During September 2019, the Notes of $282,983 plus accrued interest amended in December 2018 were restated. The restated principal balance of $333,543 were due September 2020. In connection with this restated note, we issued 20,000,000 shares of our common stock. The common stock was valued at $5,090 and recorded as a debt discount that was amortized over the life of the note. The Note is in default and negotiation of settlement.

During September 2019, the Note of $36,000 with original issuance discount of $6,000 amended in September 2018 was restated. The $6,000 original issuance discount from the Note amended in September 2018 has been repaid in full as of September 2019. The restated principal balance was $36,000 with the original issuance discount of $6,000 and was due September 2020. The $6,000 original issuance discount from the Note amended in September 2019 has been repaid in full as of September 2020. The Note was further restated in September 2020. The restated principal balance was $36,000 with the original issuance discount of $6,000 and is due March 2021. The Note is in default and negotiation of settlement.

During January 2020, the Note of $60,000 with original issuance discount of $10,000 amended in November 2018 and the Note of $88,225 plus accrued interest at a rate of 2.5% monthly to an unrelated third party were combined and restated. The restated principal balance was $148,225 that carries interest at a rate of 2.0% monthly due July 2020. During July 2020, the restated Note of $148,225 plus accrued interest of $18,701 was further restated. The new principal balance was $166,926 that carries interest at a rate of 2.0% monthly and was due January 2021. During February 2021, we issued 29,072,500 shares of common stock to satisfy the accrued interest of $23,258 with fair value of $343,056. The settlement of accrued interest resulted in a loss on settlement of debt in other income for $319,798. The principal balance of $166,926 was further restated. The restated balance is $183,619 with an original issuance discount of $16,693 and is due August 2021.

Settlement of Convertible Promissory Notes

During August 2019, the Note of $12,000 with original issuance discount of $2,000 originated in December 2019 was settled for $12,000 with scheduled payments through December 1, 2019. In connection with this settlement, we issued 1,500,000 shares of common stocks with a fair value of $450. Repayment of $3,500 was made as of December 2020. The remaining balance of $8,500 is in default and in negotiation of settlement.

During December 2019, two Notes for a total of $9,900 with original issuance discount of $900 originated in February 2018 were settled with 40,000,000 shares of common stocks. The shares were valued at fair value of $24,000.

During December 2019, three Notes for a total of $49,684 with original issuance discount of $2,700 originated in May 2017, January and September 2018, respectively, were settled with 260,000,000 shares of common stocks. The shares were valued at fair value of $130,000.

During December 2019, two Notes for a total of $46,500 originated in October and November 2018 and the accounts payable of $39,000 for consulting fees were settled with 500,000,000 shares of common stocks. The shares were valued at fair value of $300,000, and have not been issued.

During February through August 2018, we issued seven convertible promissory notes to an unrelated third party due one year from the execution dates. The principal balance of these Notes on June 30, 2019 was $511,319. During September 2020, a Note holder received a total of 107,133,333 shares of our restricted common stock in satisfaction of the principal balance of $22,000 and accrued interest of $10,140. During October 2020, the Note holder received a total of 107,817,770 shares of our restricted common stock in satisfaction of the principal balance of $22,000 and accrued interest of $10,345. During October 2020, the Note holder sold the remaining debt of $467,000 and accrued interest of $166,168 for $250,000 to a non-related party.

DateNumber ofFair Value of
shares convertedDebt Converted
9/22/2020107,133,333$171,413
10/5/2020107,817,770    64,691

31 

Settlement and Restatement of Promissory Notes

During March 2020, $50,000 of the Note of $120,000 with original issuance discount of 20,000 originated in November 2017 was settled for 125,000,000 shares. An additional 36,000,000 shares were issued to satisfy the default provision of the original note and 10,000,000 shares were issued along with the restatement. The total fair value of issued stock was $119,700. The remaining balance of $70,000 was restated with additional issuance discount of $14,000. The $84,000 due in September 2020 is in default and negotiation of further settlement.

Settlement of a Related-Party Note

During June 2020, the Note of $14,400 with original issuance discount of $2,400 to a related party amended in December 2018 was settled with cash payment of $14,400 and 5,000,000 shares of common stocks. The shares were valued at fair value of $3,000.

Advances

During the periods from October 2019 through May 2020, the Company received a total of $175,000 in deposits from a third party in connection with a Joint Venture proposal. The deposits were considered as payments towards the purchase of equity in the joint venture. The joint venture is currently on hold pending the outcome of the lawsuit with the SEC.

Common Stock Issued for Default Payments

During August 2019, we issued a total of 2,000,000 additional restricted shares to the two Note holders due to default on repayments. These shares were valued at fair value of $700.

During July 2019, we issued a total of 5,000,000 restricted shares to a Note holder due to the default on repayments of the promissory note of $282,983 plus accrued interest amended in December 2018. The shares were valued at fair value of $1,500.

During September 2019, we issued a total of 10,000,000 restricted shares to a Note holder due to the default on repayments of the original issuance discount of $10,000 for the convertible promissory notes of $60,000 amended in November 2018. The shares were valued at fair value of $4,000.

During January 2020, we issued a total of 75,000,000 restricted shares to a Note holder due to the default on repayments of the convertible promissory note of a total of $148,225 amended in August and November 2018. The shares were valued at fair value of $45,000.

During July 2020, we issued a total of 1,000,000 restricted shares to a Note holder due to the default on repayments of the promissory note of $22,000 originated in December 2019. The shares were valued at fair value of $700.

During September 2020, we issued a total of 10,000,000 restricted shares to a Note holder due to the default on repayments of the promissory note of $333,543 plus accrued interest amended in September 2019. The shares were valued at fair value of $6,000.

During October 2020, we issued a total of 1,500,000 restricted shares to a Note holder due to the default on repayments of the promissory note of $84,000 amended in March 2020. The shares were valued at fair value of $900.

During January 2021, we issued a total of 25,000,000 restricted shares to a Note holder due to the default on repayments of the promissory note of $166,926 amended in July 2020. The shares were valued at fair value of $107,500.

32 

Item 2.  Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations


Introduction


Our business during the secondfirst quarter of 20182019 has focused upon marketing our homeopathic drugs for the treatment of pain:


·Nyloxin® (Stage 2 Pain)
·Nyloxin® Extra Strength (Stage 3 Pain)
·Pet Pain–Away

·

Nyloxin® (Stage 2 Pain)

·

Nyloxin® Extra Strength (Stage 3 Pain)

·

Pet Pain–Away™


We will continue this focus during the remainder of 2018.


During our thirdsecond quarter of 20182019 and thereafter, the following has occurred:


On July 3, 2018 we announced that DEG Productions had signed an exclusive distribution deal with one of the nation’s leading direct mail marketers to launch a private label version of Pet Pain–Away™. The product will be marketed nationally to a proven list of pet product buyers through a stand–alone custom mailer. The direct mail campaign is complimentary to the ongoing television campaign in that it is designed to acquire new customers and convert them into the monthly auto–ship program.  


On July 17, 2018April 10, 2019 we announced that we had executedresponded to an agreement with American Marketing Technologies (“AMT”FDA warning letter that was issued on March 11, 2019 regarding our website and social media sites for the sales and marketing of our Nyloxin® products. In response to the FDA’s letter, we explained the basis of each of our claims as they relate to the concerns identified in the Warning Letter and made any and all necessary changes to the marketing materials for the Nyloxin Products to properly and legally continue to market and distribute its products.

On May 30, 2019 we announced that the iRemedy Healthcare Companies added the entire Nyloxin product line to their marketplace at www.IRemedy.com.

On September 22, 2020, Dr. Dale VanderPutten, our Chief Scientific Officer was invited by the Defense Threat Reduction Agency (DTRA) to launchpresent our nerve agent countermeasure technology in a Tech Watch talk to an integrated Internet marketing campaign combined withaudience of military and civilian experts in chem/bio defense. The talk titled “A Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptor (nAChR) Directed Organophosphate Countermeasure” was presented in a programvirtual internet meeting to target a numberselect expert audience invited by DTRA. The consensus of national retail chains. AMT’s approach to market the products is to create more awareness through social mediacomments and online marketing while trying to have these products availablequestions on shelves across the country. As they build brand awareness online; they will providepresentation supported the pull–through to putidea that despite past efforts, there remains an unmet need for nAChR directed defenses and that our demonstration of human safety in the products on store shelves throughout the US.clinic and pre-clinical proof of concept deserves aggressive follow up.


On September 25, 2018November 4, 2020 we announced the elimination of toxic institutional debt as the last institutional note was purchased by a long-term individual investor.

On November 11, 2020 we announced that Nyloxin has been accepted to be listed on the Walmart Marketplace and is now available there for purchase on www.Walmart.com.

On February 12, 2021 we announced that we are focusing on our intellectual property portfolio and have engaged new IP attorneys at Christopher & Weisberg P.A.

On February 23, 2021 we provided updates on our work in improving our existing facilities for manufacturing and validation of our drug products. This included the renewal of our lease for our current lab space and bringing all of manufacturing in-house.

On March 11, 2021 we announced that we had engaged AccuReg, Inc. as outside Regulatory and Quality Assurance consultants as part of our work in improving our existing facilities for manufacturing and validation of our drug products.

On March 16, 2021 we announced our plans for the marketing and distribution of Luxury Feet; an over-the-counter pain reliever and anti-inflammatory product that is designed for women who experience pain or discomfort due to high heels and stilettos.

On April 15, 2021 we announced that our work with EuroAmerican IP, LLC had resulted in a listing of the Nyloxin®newest product, lineLuxury Feet, was available for purchase on the website, www.GoVets.com.GoVETS, is the online marketplace under the National Veteran Small Business Coalition (NVSBC) to buy from VA-verified Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Businesses (SDVOSBs). EuroAmerican has teamed with BioArmor, LLC as the SDVOSB Company who established a Vendor Marketplace Agreement with the GoVets Program.  Thus providing the capability to market and sell the Nyloxin product Line in the GoVets Program.Amazon.com.

33 

 

Nyloxin®/Nyloxin® Extra Strength


We offer Nyloxin®/Nyloxin® Extra Strength as our over–the–counter (OTC) pain reliever that has been clinically proven to treat moderate to severe (Stage 2) chronic pain.


Nyloxin® and Nyloxin® Extra Strength are available as a two ounce topical gel for treating joint pain and pain associated with arthritis and repetitive stress, and as a one ounce oral spray for treating lower back pain, migraines, neck aches, shoulder pain, cramps, and neuropathic pain. Both the topical gel and oral spray are packaged and sold as a one–month supply.


Nyloxin® and Nyloxin® Extra Strength offer several benefits as a pain reliever. With increasing concern about consumers using opioid and acetaminophen–based pain relievers, the Nyloxin® products provide an alternative that does not rely on opiates or non–steroidal anti–inflammatory drugs, otherwise known as NSAIDs, for their pain relieving effects. Nyloxin® also has a well–defined safety profile. Since the early 1930s, the active pharmaceutical ingredient (API) of Nyloxin®, Asian cobra venom, has been studied in more than 46 human clinical studies. The data from these studies provide clinical evidence that cobra venom provides an effective treatment for pain with few side effects and has the following benefits:


·safe and effective;
·all natural;
·long–acting;
·easy to use;
·non–narcotic;
·non–addictive; and
·analgesic and anti–inflammatory.

·

safe and effective;

·

all natural;

·

long–acting;

·

easy to use;

·

non–narcotic;

·

non–addictive; and

·

analgesic and anti–inflammatory.


Potential side effects from the use of Nyloxin® are rare, but may include headache, nausea, vomiting, sore throat, allergic rhinitis and coughing.


21



The primary difference between Nyloxin® and Nyloxin® Extra Strength is the dilution level of the venom. The approximate dilution levels for Nyloxin® and Nyloxin® Extra Strength are as follows:


Nyloxin®


·Topical Gel: 30 mcg/mL
·Oral Spray: 70 mcg/mL

·

Topical Gel: 30 mcg/mL

·

Oral Spray: 70 mcg/mL


Nyloxin® Extra Strength


·Topical Gel: 60 mcg/mL
·Oral Spray: 140 mcg/mL

·

Topical Gel: 60 mcg/mL

·

Oral Spray: 140 mcg/mL


In December 2011, we began marketing Nyloxin® and Nyloxin® Extra Strength at www.nyloxin.com.www.nyloxin.com and on www.Amazon.com/nyloxin. Both Nyloxin® and Nyloxin®Extra Strength are packaged in a roll–on container, squeeze bottle and as an oral spray. Additionally, Nyloxin® topical gel is available in an 8 ounce pump bottle.


We are currently marketing Nyloxin® and Nyloxin® Extra Strength as treatments for moderate to severe chronic pain. Nyloxin® is available as an oral spray for treating back pain, neck pain, headaches, joint pain, migraines, and neuralgia and as a topical gel for treating joint pain, neck pain, arthritis pain, and pain associated with repetitive stress. Nyloxin® Extra Strength is available as an oral spray and gel application for treating the same physical indications, but is aimed at treating the most severe (Stage 3) pain that inhibits one’s ability to function fully.


34 

Nyloxin® Military Strength


In December 2012, we announced the availability of Nyloxin® Military Strength for sale to the United States Military and Veteran's Administration. Over the past few years, the U.S. Department of Defense has been reporting an increase in the use and abuse of prescription medications, particularly opiates. In 2009, close to 3.8 million prescriptions for pain relievers were written in the military. This staggering number was more than a 400% increase from the number of prescriptions written in the military in 2001. But prescription drugs are not the only issue. The most common and seemingly harmless way to treat pain is with non–steroidal, anti–inflammatory drugs (NSAIDS). But there are risks. Overuse can cause nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, heartburn, ulcers and internal bleeding. In severe cases chest pain, heart failure, kidney dysfunction and life–threatening allergic reactions can occur. It is reported that approximately 7,600 people in America die from NSAID use and some 78,000 are hospitalized. Ibuprofen, also an NSAID has been of particular concern in the military. The terms “Ranger Candy” and “Military Candy” refer to the service men and women who are said to use 800mg doses of Ibuprofen to control their pain. But when taking anti–inflammatory Ibuprofen in high doses for chronic pain, there is potential for critical health risks; abuse can lead to serious stomach problems, internal bleeding and even kidney failure. There are significantly greater health risks when abuse of this drug is combined with alcohol intake. Our goal is that with Nyloxin®, we can greatly reduce the instances of opiate abuse and overuse of NSAIDS in high risk groups like the US military. The Nyloxin®Military Strength represents the strongest version of Nyloxin® available and is approximately twice as strong as Nyloxin® Extra Strength. We are working with outside consultants to register Nyloxin® Military Strength and the other Nyloxin® products for sale to the US government and the various arms of the military as well as the Veteran's Administration. To date,In February of 2018, Nyloxin was added to the Federal Supply Schedule but was subsequently removed the following week without an adequate explanation. We have continued to work with our consultants to understand why our products were improperly removed the Federal Supply Schedule and when we have been unablemay be able to get our products ontore-listed on the Federal Supply Schedule for eventual sales to governmental agencies or to the US Military, but will continue these efforts.Military.


International Sales


We are pursuing international drug registrations in Canada, Mexico, India, Australia, New Zealand, Central and South America and Europe. Since European rules for homeopathic drugs are different than the rules in the US, we cannot estimate when this process will be completed. On March 25, 2013 we announced the publication of our patent and trademark for Nyloxin® in India. We are currently working with potential Distributorsactively seeking new distribution partners in India. In February, 2015 we completed the first test shipments to India. We plan to begin active sales and marketing in India in 2019.


On May 14, 2015 we announced that we had engaged the Nature's Clinic to begin the process of regulatory approval of our Company's Over–the–Counter pain drug, Nyloxin® for marketing and distribution in Canada. The Nature’s Clinic has already begun setting up their Chatham, Ontario warehouse and expectwarehouse. Due to lack of funding, we have waited to complete the approval process to begin distributing Nyloxin® by early 2019.and expect to re-engage in the process in 2021.


On February 1, 2018 we announced a Distribution Agreement with the Australian company, Pharmachal PTY LTD to market and distribute Nyloxin® in Australia and New Zealand. Pharmachal has begun the registration process with the TGA (Therapeutic Goods Administration). At this time, we do not know if our products will qualify for TGA registration and cannot provide a timeline for the eventual distribution in Australia.


22



Additionally, we plan to complete several human clinical studies aimed at comparing the ability of Nyloxin® Extra Strength to replace prescription pain relievers. We have provided protocols to several hospitals and will provide details and timelines when those protocols have been accepted. We cannot provide any timeline for these studies until adequate financing is available.


To date, our marketing efforts have been limited due to lack of funding. As sales increase, we plan to begin marketing more aggressively to increase the sales and awareness of our products.


Pet Pain–Away™Away


During June of 2013, we announced the launch of our new homeopathic formula for the treatment of chronic pain in companion animals, Pet Pain–Away™. Pet Pain–Away™ is a homeopathic, non–narcotic, non–addictive, over–the–counter pain reliever, primarily aimed at treating moderate to severe chronic pain in companion animals. It is specifically indicated to treat pain from hip dysplasia, arthritis pain, joint pain, and general chronic pain in dogs and cats. The initial product run was completed in December of 2014 and launched through Lumaxa Distributors on December 19, 2014.


35 

In May of 2016, we signed a license agreement to begin the process of creating an infomercial (Direct Response) campaign for Pet Pain–Away™. In November of 2016, we announced the license agreement with DEG Productions for the marketing and distribution of Pet Pain–Away globally. DEG has the ability to earn the exclusive distribution rights for the product by reaching certain sales milestones. DEG has created their own website (www.getpetpainaway.com) and began airing commercials in December of 2016. DEG is expected to ramp up their sales and

In February of 2020, we took back the marketing of Pet Pain–Away throughout 2018.Pain-Away and are currently selling the product on Amazon.com and through www.petpainaway.com.


Luxury Feet


In June of 2017 we announced the creation of Luxury Feet; an over–the–counter pain reliever and anti–inflammatory product that is designed for women who experience pain or discomfort due to high heels and stilettos. We are currently seeking distributorsIn March of 2021 we announced plans for the marketing and distribution of Luxury Feet and expecton April 15, 2021 we announced that the salesproduct was available for purchase on Amazon. We will continue with the marketing efforts of Luxury Feet throughout 2021 with plans to start social media campaigns and a retail rollout later in early 2019.the year.

 

Equine Nyloxin®Pain-Away (Formerly Equine Nyloxin)


In October of 2013, we announced that we were in the process of launching the newest addition to our line of homeopathic treatments for chronic pain, Equine Nyloxin®Nyloxin, a topical therapy for horses that is packaged as a two piece kit: Nyloxin® Topical Gel comprises Step 1 and a solution of DMSO (dimethylsulfoxide) comprises Step 2.. We havehad been working with trainers and veterinarians in the equine industry and have already identified distributors for the product. The Equine Nyloxin® represents the Company's first topical solution for the animal market. The productEquine Nyloxin was rebranded as Equine Pain-Away and officially rolled into the market in October of 2019. Equine Pain-Away is now undergoing market evaluation. Dependingbeing marketed through several retailers and online at www.EquinePainAway.com and on market research results, we may delay the product launch and will review options for potential distribution in the future.Amazon.


Drug Discovery and Pipeline


Nutra Pharma is developing proprietary therapeutic protein products for the biologics market. The Company has two leading drug candidates: RPI–MN and RPI–78M.


RPI–MN


RPI–MN inhibits the entry of several viruses that are known to cause severe neurological damage in such diseases as encephalitis and Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV). It is being developed first for the treatment of HIV.


RPI–78M


RPI–78M is being developed for the treatment of Multiple Sclerosis (MS) and Adrenomyeloneuropathy (AMN). Other neurological and autoimmune disorders that may be served by RPI–78M include Myasthenia Gravis (MG), Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) and Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS).


RPI–78M and RPI–MN contain anticholinergic peptides that recognize the same receptors as nicotine (acetylcholine receptors) but have the opposite effect. In a specific chemical process unique to Nutra Pharma, the drugs are created through a process of chemical modification.


In September, 2015 RPI–78M was granted Orphan Status by the FDA for the treatment of pediatric Multiple Sclerosis. This allows for much shorter timelines to drug approval, waiver of FDA fees (around $2.5M), rolling review and fast–track approval. Orphan status also allows for potential grant money and other funding opportunities through the clinical process.


23



RPI–MN and RPI–78M possess several desirable properties as drugs:

 

·

They lack measurable toxicity but are still capable of attaching to and affecting the target site on the nerve cells. This means that patients cannot overdose.

·

They display no serious adverse side effects following years of investigations in humans and animals.

·

They are extremely stable and resistant to heat, which gives the drugs a long shelf life. The drugs' stability has been determined to be over 4 years at room temperature. This is extremely unusual for a biologic drug.

·

RPI78M may be administered orally –– a first for a biologic MS drug. This will present MS patients with additional quality of life benefits by eliminating the requirement for routine injections.

·

·They lack measurable toxicity but are still capable of attaching to and affecting the target site on the nerve cells. This means that patients cannot overdose.
·They display no serious adverse side effects following years of investigations in humans and animals.
·They are extremely stable and resistant to heat, which gives the drugs a long shelf life. The drugs' stability has been determined to be over 4 years at room temperature. This is extremely unusual for a biologic drug.
·RPI–78M may be administered orally –– a first for a biologic MS drug. This will present MS patients with additional quality of life benefits by eliminating the requirement for routine injections.
·They are easy to administer.

36 

 

We are currently working with consultants to develop trial protocols for a Phase I/II trial for the use of RPI–78M in the treatment of Pediatric Multiple Sclerosis. We expect to begin the trial in FY2019.FY2021.

 

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

 

Our condensed consolidated unaudited financial statements and accompanying notes have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“GAAP”) applied on a consistent basis.  The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods.

 

We regularly evaluate the accounting policies and estimates that we use to prepare our condensed consolidated financial statements.  In general, management’s estimates are based on historical experience, information from third party professionals, and various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the facts and circumstances. Actual results could differ from those estimates made by management under different and/or future circumstances.

 

We believe that our critical accounting policies and estimates include our ability to continue as a going concern, revenue recognition, accounts receivable and allowance for doubtful accounts, inventory obsolescence, accounting for long–lived assets and accounting for stock based compensation.

 

Ability to Continue as a Going Concern:  Our ability to continue as a going concern is contingent upon our ability to secure additional financing, increase ownership equity, and attain profitable operations.  In addition, our ability to continue as a going concern must be considered in light of the problems, expenses and complications frequently encountered in established markets and the competitive environment in which we operate.

 

Revenue Recognition: In May 2014, theOn January 1, 2018, we adopted Financial Accounting StandardsStandard Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting StandardsStandard Codification (“ASC׆ASC”) Topic 606, "Revenue Fromfrom Contracts With Customers, originally effectivewith Customers" ("ASC Topic 606") using the modified retrospective method applied to those contracts which were not completed as of January 1, 2018. The cumulative impact of adopting ASC Topic 606 resulted in no changes to retained earnings at January 1, 2018. The impact to revenue for public business entities with annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016. On August 12, 2015, the FASB issuedsix months ended June 30, 2018 was an Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”), Revenue From Contracts With Customers (Topic 606): Deferralincrease of $2,780 as a result of applying ASC Topic 606 to certain revenues generated through online distributors which are now presented gross as we have control over providing the Effective Date, which deferred the effective date of ASC 606 for one year. ASC 606 provides accounting guidanceproducts related to revenue from contracts with customers. For public business entities, ASC 606 is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2017.such revenues. This new revenue recognition standard (new guidance) has a five-step process: a) Determine whether a contract exists;exists; b) Identify the performance obligations;obligations; c) Determine the transaction price;price; d) Allocate the transaction price;price; and e) Recognize revenue when (or as) performance obligations are satisfied. The Company has evaluated the impact of ASC Topic 606 and determined that there is no change to the Company’sCompany's accounting policies, except for the recording of certain product sales to a distributor, in which a portion of the cash proceeds received is remitted back to the distributor. Under ASC Topic 606, the Company determined that these sales should be recorded on a gross basis.

Our revenues are primarily derived from customer orders for the purchase of our products. We recognize revenues as performance obligations are fulfilled upon delivery of products. We record revenues net of promotions and discounts. For certain product sales to a distributor, we record revenue including a portion of the cash proceeds that is remitted back to the distributor.

 

Accounts Receivable and Allowance for Doubtful Accounts: Our accounts receivable are stated at estimated net realizable value. Accounts receivable are comprised of balances due from customers net of estimated allowances for uncollectible accounts. In determining collectability, historical trends are evaluated and specific customer issues are reviewed to arrive at appropriate allowances.

 

Inventory Obsolescence: Inventories are valued at the lower of average cost or market value. We periodically perform an evaluation of inventory for excess, impairments and obsolete items.

 

Long–Lived Assets: The carrying value of long–lived assets is reviewed annually and on a regular basis for the existence of facts and circumstances that may suggest impairment. If indicators of impairment are present, we determine whether the sum of the estimated undiscounted future cash flows attributable to the long–lived asset in question is less than its carrying amount. If less, we measure the amount of the impairment based on the amount that the carrying value of the impaired asset exceeds the discounted cash flows expected to result from the use and eventual disposal of the impaired assets.

 

37 

Derivative Financial Instrument: We do not use derivative instruments to hedge exposures to cash flow, market, or foreign currency risks. Management evaluates all of its financial instruments to determine if such instruments are derivatives or contain features that qualify as embedded derivatives. For derivative financial instruments that are accounted for as liabilities, the derivative instrument is initially recorded at its fair value and is then re–valued at each reporting date, with changes in the fair value reported as charges or credits to income. For option–based simple derivative financial instruments, we use the Black–Scholes option pricing model to value the derivative instruments at inception and subsequent valuation dates. For complex embedded derivatives, we use a Dilution–Adjusted Black–Scholes method to value the derivative instruments at inception and subsequent valuation dates. The classification of derivative instruments, including whether such instruments should be recorded as liabilities or as equity, is re–assessed at the end of each reporting period. Derivative instrument liabilities are classified in the balance sheet as current or non–current based on whether or not net–cash settlement of the derivative instrument could be required within 12 months of the balance sheet date.

 


Share–Based Compensation: We record share–based compensation in accordance with FASB ASC 718, Stock Compensation. FASB ASC 718 requires that the cost resulting from all share–based transactions are recorded in the financial statements over the respective service periods. It establishes fair value as the measurement objective in accounting for share–based payment arrangements and requires all entities to apply a fair–value–based measurement in accounting for share–based payment transactions with employees. FASB ASC 718 also establishes fair value as the measurement objective for transactions in which an entity acquires goods or services from non–employees in share–based payment transactions.


Results of Operations – Comparison of Three Months Periods Ended SeptemberJune 30, 20182019 and SeptemberJune 30, 20172018


Net salesSales for the three–month period ended September30, 2018 are $43,966June 30, 2019 were $10,215 compared to $38,049$29,381 for the three–monththree months period ended September30, 2017.June 30, 2018.  The increasedecrease in net sales is primarily attributable to the increasedecrease in Pet Pain–Away sales, offset by the decrease in Nyloxin®Pain-Away products sales.


Cost of sales for the three–month period ended September30, 2018June 30, 2019 is $37,409$3,774 compared to $4,340$16,570 for the three–month period June 30, 2018.  Our cost of sales includes the direct costs associated with manufacturing, shipping and handling costs. Our gross profit margin for the three–month period ended September30, 2017.June 30, 2019 is $6,441 or 63.05% compared to $12,811 or 43.60% for the three–month period ended June 30, 2018. The increase in our profit margin is primarily due to decrease in the manufacturing cost.

Selling, general and administrative expenses (“SG&A”) decreased $14,373 or 4.12% from $348,660 for the quarter ended June 30, 2018 to $334,287 for the quarter ended June 30, 2019, generally due to the overall decrease of approximately $14,000 in professional fees.

Interest expense, including related party interest expense, decreased $100,994 or 50.39%, from $165,194 for the quarter ended June 30, 2018 to $64,200 for quarter ended June 30, 2019.  

We carry certain of our debentures and common stock warrants at fair value. For the three months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018, the liability related to these hybrid instruments fluctuated, resulting in a loss of $1,275,111 and $849,376, respectively.

Gain on settlement of debts and accounts payable decreased $20,727 or 105.34%, from a gain of $$19,677 for the three months ended June 30, 2018 to a loss of $1,050 for the three months ended June 30, 2019.  This decrease was due to the decrease in settlement of debts.

As a result of the foregoing, our net loss increased by $337,465 or 25.36%, from $1,330,742 for the quarter ended June 30, 2018 to $1,668,207 for the quarter ended June 30, 2019.

Comparison of Six Months Ended June 30, 2019 and June 30, 2018

Net sales for the six months ended June 30, 2019 are $51,537 compared to $60,357 for the six months ended June 30, 2018.  The decrease in net sales is primarily attributable to the overall decrease in Pet Pain-Away products sales.

Cost of sales for the six months ended June 30, 2019 is $19,399 compared to $20,929 for the six months ended June 30, 2018.  Our cost of sales includes the direct costs associated with Pet Pain-Away manufacturing. Our gross profit margin for the three–month periodsix months ended September30, 2018June 30, 2019 is $6,557$32,138 or 14.9%62.36% compared to $33,709$39,428 or 88.6%65.32% for the three–month periodsix months ended September30, 2017.June 30, 2018.


38 

Selling, general and administrative expenses (“SG&A”) increased $553,576 or 180.2% from $307,232 for the quarter ended September30, 2017 to $860,808 for the quarter ended September30, 2018, generally due to the increase in bad debt expense of $498,470, the increase in stock based compensation of $25,015 or 501.8% from $4,985 for the three months period ending September30, 2017 to $30,000 for the three months period ending September30, 2018, and the increase of $30,086 in legal fees, consulting, travel and professional fees.  


Interest expense, increased $171,826including related party interest expense, decreased $296,942 or 180.8%67.41%, from $95,063$440,483 for the quartersix months ended September30, 2017June 30, 2018 to $266,889$143,541 for the comparable 20182019 period.  This increasedecrease was primarily due to increasean overall decrease in amortization of loan discountsshort term indebtedness in the quartersix months ended September30, 2018June 30, 2019 compared to the quartersix months ended September30, 2017.June 30, 2018. Interest expense on these debentures is included in the fair value loss in the statements of operations.


We carry certain of our debentures and common stock warrants at fair value. For the threesix months ended September30,June 30, 2019 and 2018, and 2017, the liability related to these hybrid instruments fluctuated, resulting in a gain of $192,800 and a loss of $612,863, respectively.

Loss on settlement of debt and accounts payable increased $40,100 or 100%, from the loss of $0 for the three months ended September30, 2017 to the loss of $40,100 for the comparable 2018 period.  This increase was primarily due to loss on settlement of debt through issuance of shares of common stock for the three months ended September30, 2018 compared to the comparable 2017 period.


As a result of the foregoing, our net loss increased by $13,534 or 1.4%, from $981,449 for the quarter ended September30, 2017 to $967,915 for the comparable 2018 period.


Comparison of Nine Months Ended September 30, 2018 and September 30, 2017


Net sales for the nine months ended September30, 2018 are $104,323 compared to $88,207 for the nine months ended September30, 2017.  The increase in net sales is primarily attributable to the increase in Nyloxin® sales and Pet Pain-Away sales.


Cost of sales for the nine months ended September30, 2018 is $58,338 compared to $23,122 for the nine months ended September30, 2017.  Our cost of sales includes the direct costs associated with Pet Pain-Away manufacturing. Our gross profit margin for the nine months ended September30, 2018 is $45,985 or 44.1% compared to $65,085 or 73.8% for the nine months ended September30, 2017.


Selling, general and administrative expenses (“SG&A”) increased $401,455 or 34.3% from $1,172,086 for the nine months ended September30, 2017 to $1,573,541 for the nine months ended September30, 2018, generally due to the increase in bad debt expense of $498,470, offset by the decrease in stock based compensation of $27,020 or 40.3% from $67,020 for the nine months period ending September30, 2017 to $40,000 for the nine months period ending September30, 2018, and overall decrease of $69,995 in consulting, travel and professional fees.  


Interest expense increased $441,457 or 166.0%, from $265,915 for the nine months ended September30, 2017 to $707,372 for the comparable 2018 period.  This increase was primarily due to an increase in amortization of loan discounts in the quarter ended September30, 2018 compared to the quarter ended September30, 2017.


25



We carry certain of our debentures and common stock warrants at fair value. For the nine months ended September30, 2018 and 2017, the liability related to these hybrid instruments fluctuated, resulting in a loss of $4,151,435$1,404,528 and $1,649,719,$1,982,864, respectively.


LossGain on settlement of debt and accounts payable increased $6,234decreased $712,120 or 43.9%92.68%, from the lossgain of $14,189$768,323 for the ninesix months ended September30, 2017June 30, 2018 to the lossgain of $20,423$56,203 for the comparable 20182019 period.  This increasedecrease was due to loss onthe decrease in settlement of debt through issuance of shares of common stock, offset by a gain on an over accrual of accrued expense for the nine months ended September30, 2018 compared to the comparable 2017 period.debts.


Our net loss increaseddecreased by $3,369,437$259,679 or 111.0%11.15%, from $3,036,824$2,328,329 for the ninesix months ended September30, 2017June 30, 2019 to $6,406,261$2,068,650 for the comparable 20182019 period.


Liquidity and Capital Resources


We have incurred significant losses from operations and working capital and stockholders’ deficits raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern.  Further, as stated in Note 1 to our condensed consolidated unaudited financial statements for the period ended SeptemberJune 30, 2018,2019, we have an accumulated deficit of $63,794,408,$63,341,492 at June 30, 2019. In addition, we have a significant amount of indebtedness in default, a working capital deficit of $5,324,461$7,622,011 and a stockholders’ deficit of $5,361,923$7,652,158 at SeptemberJune 30, 2018.2019.


Our ability to continue as a going concern is contingent upon our ability to secure additional financing, increase ownership equity, and attain profitable operations.  In addition, our ability to continue as a going concern must be considered in light of the problems, expenses and complications frequently encountered in established markets and the competitive environment in which we operate. As of September 30, 2018,May 7, 2021, we do not believe that our source of cash is adequate for the next 12 months of operation and there is substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern.


Historically, we have relied upon loans from our Chief Executive Officer, Rik Deitsch, to fund our operations. At June 30, 2019, the balance due to our President and CEO, Rik Deitsch, is $161,418, which is an unsecured demand loan that bears interest at 4%. During the six months ended June 30, 2019, we repaid $61,715 to and collected $4,100 from Mr. Deitsch and the Companies owned by him, and increased the reserve by $29,000 for the amounts receivables from companies owned by the Company's CEO. Additionally, accrued interest on the demand loan was $3,536 and is included in the due to officer account.

During the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2018,2019, we raised $941,800$484,879 through the issuance of convertible notes. Current operations are being funded through a combination of product sales, loans from our CEO and convertible notes. 


We expect to utilize the proceeds from these funds and additional capital to manufacture Nyloxin® and Pet Pain–Away and reduce our debt level.  We estimate that we will require approximately $240,000 to fund our existing operations and ReceptoPharm’s operations through December 31, 2018.2019.  These costs include: (i) compensation for three (3) full–time employees; (ii) compensation for various consultants who we deem critical to our business; (iii) general office expenses including rent and utilities; (iv) product liability insurance; and (v) outside legal and accounting services.  These costs reflected in (i) – (v) do not include research and development costs or other costs associated with clinical studies.


We began generating revenues from the sale of Cobroxin® in the fourth quarter of 2009 and from the sale of Nyloxin® during the first quarter of 2011.  We began generating revenues from the sale of Pet Pain–Away™ in the fourth quarter of 2014. Our ability to meet our future operating expenses is highly dependent on the amount of such future revenues.  To the extent that future revenues from the sales of Nyloxin® and Pet Pain–Away™ are insufficient to cover our operating expenses we may need to raise additional equity capital, which could result in substantial dilution to existing shareholders.  There can be no assurance that we will be able to raise sufficient equity capital to fund our working capital requirements on terms acceptable to us, or at all.  We may also seek additional loans from our officers and directors; however, there can be no assurance that we will be successful in securing such additional loans.


Selling, general and administrative expenses (“SG&A”) decreased $103,811 or 14.57% from $712,733 for the six months ended June 30, 2018 to $608,922 for the six months ended June 30, 2019, generally due to the overall decrease of approximately $104,000 in professional fees.

39 

Impact of COVID-19 on our Operations

The ramifications of the outbreak of the novel strain of COVID-19, reported to have started in December 2019 and spread globally, are filled with uncertainty and changing quickly. Our operations have continued during the COVID-19 pandemic and we have not had significant disruption. Beginning in June 2020, the Company experienced a delay in retail rollout as a downstream implication of the slowing economy. We also closed our Coral Springs office in effort to save money. During May 2020, we received approval from SBA to fund our request for a PPP loan for $64,895. We intended to use the proceeds primarily for payroll costs. During April and June 2020, we obtained the loan in the amount of $154,900 from SBA under its Economic Injury Disaster Loan assistance program. We intended to use the proceeds primarily for working capital purpose.

The Company is operating in a rapidly changing environment so the extent to which COVID-19 impacts its business, operations and financial results from this point forward will depend on numerous evolving factors that the Company cannot accurately predict. Those factors include the following: the duration and scope of the pandemic; governmental, business and individuals’ actions that have been and continue to be taken in response to the pandemic; and the development of widespread testing or a vaccine.

Uncertainties and Trends


Our operations and possible revenues are dependent now and in the future upon the following factors:


·whether Nyloxin®, Nyloxin® Extra Strength and Pet Pain–Away will be accepted by retail establishments where they are sold;
·because Nyloxin® is a novel approach to the over–the–counter pain market, whether it will be accepted by consumers over conventional over–the–counter pain products;
·whether Nyloxin® Military Strength will be successfully launched and be accepted in the marketplace;
·whether our international drug applications will be approved and in how many countries;
·whether we will be successful in marketing Nyloxin®, Nyloxin® Extra Strength and Pet Pain–Away in our target markets and create nationwide and international visibility for our products;
·whether our drug delivery system, i.e. oral spray and gel, will be accepted by consumers who may prefer a pain pill delivery system;
·whether competitors’ pain products will be found to be more attractive to consumers;
·whether we successfully develop and commercialize products from our research and development activities;
·whether we compete effectively in the intensely competitive biotechnology area;
·whether we successfully execute our planned partnering and out–licensing products or technologies;
·whether the current economic downturn and related credit and financial market crisis will adversely affect our ability to obtain financing, conduct our operations and realize opportunities to successfully bring our technologies to market;
·whether we are subject to litigation and related costs in connection with use of products;
·whether we will successfully contract with domestic distributor(s)/advertiser(s) for our products and whether that will cause interruptions in our operations;
·whether we comply with FDA and other extensive legal/regulatory requirements affecting the healthcare industry.

·

whether Nyloxin®, Nyloxin® Extra Strength and Pet PainAway will be accepted by retail establishments where they are sold;

·

because Nyloxin® is a novel approach to the overthecounter pain market, whether it will be accepted by consumers over conventional overthecounter pain products;

·

whether Nyloxin® Military Strength will be successfully launched and be accepted in the marketplace;

·

whether our international drug applications will be approved and in how many countries;

·

whether we will be successful in marketing Nyloxin®, Nyloxin® Extra Strength and Pet PainAway in our target markets and create nationwide and international visibility for our products;

·

whether our drug delivery system, i.e. oral spray and gel, will be accepted by consumers who may prefer a pain pill delivery system;

·

whether competitors pain products will be found to be more attractive to consumers;



·

whether we successfully develop and commercialize products from our research and development activities;

·

whether we compete effectively in the intensely competitive biotechnology area;

·

whether we successfully execute our planned partnering and outlicensing products or technologies;

·

whether the current economic downturn and related credit and financial market crisis will adversely affect our ability to obtain financing, conduct our operations and realize opportunities to successfully bring our technologies to market;

·

whether we are subject to litigation and related costs in connection with use of products;

·

whether we will successfully contract with domestic distributor(s)/advertiser(s) for our products and whether that will cause interruptions in our operations;

·

whether we comply with FDA and other extensive legal/regulatory requirements affecting the healthcare industry.


OffOff–Balance Sheet Arrangements


We have not entered into any transaction, agreement or other contractual arrangement with an entity unconsolidated with us under whom we have:


·An obligation under a guarantee contract.
·A retained or contingent interest in assets transferred to the unconsolidated entity or similar arrangement that serves as credit, liquidity or market risk support to such entity for such assets.
·Any obligation, including a contingent obligation, under a contract that would be accounted for as a derivative instrument.
·Any obligation, including a contingent obligation, arising out of a variable interest in an unconsolidated entity that is held by us and material to us where such entity provides financing, liquidity, market risk or credit risk support to, or engages in leasing, hedging or research and development services with us.

40 

·

An obligation under a guarantee contract.

·

A retained or contingent interest in assets transferred to the unconsolidated entity or similar arrangement that serves as credit, liquidity or market risk support to such entity for such assets.

·

Any obligation, including a contingent obligation, under a contract that would be accounted for as a derivative instrument.

·

Any obligation, including a contingent obligation, arising out of a variable interest in an unconsolidated entity that is held by us and material to us where such entity provides financing, liquidity, market risk or credit risk support to, or engages in leasing, hedging or research and development services with us.


We do not have any off–balance sheet arrangements or commitments other than those disclosed in this report that have a current or future effect on its financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures, or capital resources that is material.


Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk


Not applicable


Item 4. Controls and Procedures


Disclosure Controls and Procedures


As of September30, 2018,June 30, 2019, we carried out an evaluation under the supervision and the participation of our Chief Executive Officer/Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of September30, 2018,June 30, 2019, as defined in Rule 13a–15 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Exchange Act”).  Based on that evaluation, our management, including our Chief Executive Officer/Chief Financial Officer, concluded that, because of the material weaknesses in internal control over financial reporting discussed in Section 9A of our annual report on Form 10–K, our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective, at a reasonable assurance level, as of September30, 2018.June 30, 2019. In light of this, we performed additional post–closing procedures and analyses in order to prepare the Condensed Consolidated Unaudited Financial Statements included in this report. As a result of these procedures, we believe our Condensed Consolidated Unaudited Financial Statements included in this report present fairly, in all material respects, our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows for the periods presented.  A control system cannot provide absolute assurance, however, that the objectives of the controls system are met, and no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, with the company have been detected.


Disclosure controls and procedures are controls and other procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our reports filed or submitted under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our reports filed under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to management, including our Chief Executive Officer, who also acted as our Principal Financial Officer as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.


Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting


There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting identified in connection with the evaluation required by paragraph (d) of Rule 13a–15 or 15d–15 under the Exchange Act that occurred during the quarter ended September30, 2018June 30, 2019 that have materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.


41 

27



PART II. OTHER INFORMATION


Item 1. Legal Proceedings


Patricia Meding, et. al. v. ReceptoPharm, Inc. f/k/a Receptogen, Inc.


On June 1, 2015, ReceptoPharm entered into a settlement agreement with Patricia Meding, a former officer and shareholder of ReceptoPharm.  The settlement relates to a lawsuit filed by Ms. Meding against ReceptoPharm (Patricia Meding, et. al. v. ReceptoPharm, Inc. f/k/a Receptogen, Inc., Index No.: 18247/06, New York Supreme Court, Queens County) in which she claimed to own certain shares of ReceptoPharm stock and claimed to be owed amounts on a series of promissory notes allegedly executed in 2001 and 2002.

 

The settlement agreement executed on June 1, 2015 provides that ReceptoPharm will pay Ms. Meding a total of $360,000 over 35 months. The first payment of $20,000 was made on July 1, 2015. A second payment of $20,000 was made on August 17, 2015 with 32 subsequent monthly $10,000 payments due on the 15th of every month thereafter. To date, ReceptoPharm has made all monthly payments due under the agreement.  In the event of default on any of the payments due under the settlement agreement, the settlement amount would increase by an additional $200,000.  As of September 30,December 31, 2018, all payments were made and the settlement is concluded. We have recorded $200,000 in other income for the over accrual of default upon payments in full in April 2018.


Liquid Packaging Resources, Inc. v. Nutra Pharma Corp. and Erik “Rik” Deitsch


On April 21, 2011, Nutra Pharma Corp. and its CEO, Erik Deitsch, were named as defendants in Liquid Packaging Resources, Inc. v. Nutra Pharma Corp. and Erik “Rik” Deitsch, Superior Court of Fulton County, Georgia, Civil Action No. 2011–CV–199562. Liquid Packaging Resources, Inc. (“LPR”) claimed that Nutra Pharma Corp. and Mr. Deitsch, directly or through other companies, placed orders with LPR that required LPR to purchase components from third parties. LPR sought reimbursement for those third party expenses in the amount of not less than $359,826.85 plus interest. LPR also sought punitive damages in the amount of not less than $500,000 and attorney's fees.

Mr. Deitsch and Nutra Pharma Corp. then removed the action to the United States District Court, Northern District of Georgia, Civil Action No. 11–CV–01663–ODE. After removal, LPR amended the Complaint to assert that Nutra Pharma Corp. and Mr. Deitsch were the alter egos of the alleged other companies through whom the subject orders were placed and therefore should be considered one and the same.

At LPR's request, the parties mediated the dispute. At the mediation, the parties worked out an agreement whereby Nutra Pharma Corp. would purchase from LPR the components LPR purchased from third parties at an amount slightly less than the principal amount of the suit and on terms acceptable to us. The agreed price was $350,000 payable over 7 months in equal $50,000 amounts. The litigation was dismissed in August of 2011.  Following several payments under the parties’ agreement, the parties entered into two amended payment schedules as accommodations to Nutra Pharma Corp. to allow it to make payments that had been missed.  Nutra Pharma Corp. did not make a payment in March 2012 and LPR subsequently called Nutra Pharma Corp. in default of the parties’ agreement. 

On June 11, 2012, LPR sold its debt to Southridge Partners, LLP in an agreement to be paid out over time. In August 2013, LPR cancelled their agreement with Southridge Partners, LLP.  LPR filed a notice of intent to administratively dissolve in May 2015 (with the dissolution becoming effective in December 2015) and has not pursued its claimed default against Nutra Pharma Corp. in any court or other formal proceeding since that date.


Paul Reid et al. v. Nutra Pharma Corp. et al.

 

On August 26, 2016, certain of former ReceptoPharm employees and a former ReceptoPharm consultant filed a lawsuit in the 17th Judicial Circuit in and for Broward County, Florida (Case No. CACE16–015834) against Nutra Pharma and Receptopharm to recover $315,000 allegedly owing to them under a settlement agreement reached in an involuntary bankruptcy action that was brought by the same individuals in 2012 and for payment of unpaid wages/breach of written debt confirms.  On September 28, 2016, Nutra Pharma and Receptopharm filed a motion to dismiss the lawsuit. 

 

Nutra Pharma and Receptopharm believe that the lawsuit is without merit, and also intend to file a counterclaim againstespecially in light of gross misconduct by these former employees/consultants for misconductemployees that Nutra Pharmawas discovered after execution of the aforementioned settlement agreement. We intend to vigorously contest this matter.

On October 26, 2017,9, 2020, the Court dismissedentered an Order denying the claimsplaintiffs’ motion for unpaid wages/breachsummary judgment with respect to Count I of written debt confirms but allowed the claim forComplaint (for alleged breach of the aforementioned settlement agreementagreement), and the parties continue to go forward.  Sinceengage in discovery regarding their respective claims and defenses. The case is currently set for trial during the Petitioners can only reinforceperiod from May 10, 2021 to May 28, 2021, but it is unclear at this time with the settlement amount due to passingongoing COVID-19 pandemic (and the resultant cessation of statute of limitation, we have accruedjury trials in Broward County) whether the settlement for $315,000 and recorded the gain on settlement of $770,968 in other income for the year ended December 31, 2015. The accrued balance for the settlement has not changed as of September 30, 2018. At September 30, 2018, we owed principal balance of $101,818 and accrued interest of $17,944 (See Note 5).trial will proceed at that time. 



Get Credit Healthy, Inc. v. Nutra Pharma Corp. and Rik Deitsch, Case No. CACE 18-017055


On August 1, 2018, Get Credit Healthy, Inc. filed a lawsuit against Nutra Pharma Corp. and Rik Deitsch (collectively the “Defendants”) in the 17th Judicial Circuit Court in and for Broward County, Florida (Case No. CACE 18-017055) to recover $100,000.00$100,000 allegedly owed under an amended promissory note dated April 12, 2017. On September 10, 2018, the Defendants filed their Answer and Affirmative Defenses to the Complaint. The Defendants believe that the lawsuit is without merit and that they have a number of valid defenses to this claim. Among other things, the majority owner of Get Credit Healthy, Inc. violated the terms of a Binding Memorandum of Understanding by failing to invest in Nutra Pharma Corp. and fraudulently inducing Defendants to enter into the subject amended promissory note. Defendants plan on filed a third-party complaint against the majority owner of Get Credit Healthy, Inc. for his misrepresentations and to vigorously contest this matter. Counsel for Get Credit Healthy, Inc. has requested an early mediation conference in an attempt to resolve our dispute. We agreed to this request, (in large part because we will be required to mediate the lawsuit prior to trial under the applicable local rules), but as of yet, noand mediation date has been set. took place on February 15, 2019.  At September 30,December 31, 2018, we owed principal balance of $101,818 and accrued interest of $17,944$21,023. At mediation, Get Credit Healthy, Inc. claimed that the individual that breached the binding memorandum of understanding with Nutra Pharma Corp. was never an owner of Get Credit Healthy, Inc., but rather, a close friend that encouraged Get Credit Healthy, Inc. to make the subject loan to Nutra Pharma Corp.  Ultimately, the parties were able to reach a Confidential Settlement Agreement to resolve the dispute, and an Agreed Order was entered dismissing the lawsuit. The lawsuit was settled on February 15, 2019 for $104,000 with scheduled payments through May 1, 2020. The repayments were made in full as of November 2020 (See Note 5)6).


CSA 8411, LLC v. Nutra Pharma Corp., Case No. CACE 18-023150

On October 12, 2018, CSA 8411, LLC filed a lawsuit against the Company in the 17th Judicial Circuit Court in and for Broward County, Florida (Case No. CACE 18-023150) to recover $100,000 allegedly owed under an amended promissory note dated April 12, 2017. On November 1, 2018, the Company filed its Answer and Affirmative Defenses to the Complaint. The Company believes that this lawsuit is without merit. Moreover, the Company believes that it has a number of valid defenses to this claim. Among other things, the owner of CSA 8411, LLC violated the terms of a Binding Memorandum of Understanding by failing to invest in the Company and fraudulently inducing the Company to enter into the subject amended promissory note (contrary to the Get Credit Healthy lawsuit discussed above, we are certain that this individual is the majority owner of CSA 8411, LLC). Opposing counsel reached out to schedule mediation, and mediation was set for June 21, 2019 in Plantation, FL however the mediation was unsuccessful.  At June 30, 2019, we owed principal balance of $91,156 and accrued interest of $24,433 (See Note 6) if the defenses and our new claims are deemed be of no merit.

42 

The Company also filed affirmative claims against the Plaintiff, its owner Dan Oran and several relate entities. The case has not been set for trial as of this date.

Securities and Exchange Commission v. Nutra Pharma Corporation, Erik Deitsch, and Sean Peter McManus


On September 28, 2018, the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) filed a lawsuit in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York (Case No. 2:18-cv-05459) against Nutra Pharma,the Company, Mr. Deitsch, and Mr. McManus. The lawsuit alleges that, from July 2013 through June 2018, Nutra Pharmathe Company and the other defendants defrauded investors by making materially false and misleading statements about Nutra Pharmat and violated anti-fraud and other securities laws.


The violations alleged against Nutra Pharmathe Company by the SEC include: (a) raising over $920,000.00$920,000 in at least two private placement offerings for which Nutra Pharmathe Company failed to file required registration statements with the SEC; (b) issuing a series of materially false or misleading press releases; (c) making false statements in at least one Form 10-Q; and (d) failing to make required public filings with the SEC to disclose Nutra Pharma’sthe Company’s issuance of millions of shares of stock. The lawsuit makes additional allegations against Mr. McManus and Mr. Deitsch, including that Mr. McManus acted as a broker without SEC registration and defrauded at least one investor by making false statements about Nutra Pharma,the Company, that Mr. Deitsch engaged in manipulative trades of Nutra Pharma’sthe Company’s stock by offering to pay more for shares he was purchasing than the amount the seller was willing to take, and that Mr. Deitsch failed to make required public filings with the SEC. The lawsuit seeks both injunctive and monetary relief.


On May 29, 2019 (following each of the defendants filing motions to dismiss), the SEC filed a First Amended Complaint which generally alleged the same conduct as its original Complaint, but accounted for certain guidance provided by the United States Supreme Court in a case that had been recently decided. Each of the defendants then moved to dismiss the SEC’s First Amended Complaint. On March 31, 2020, the Court entered an Order granting in part and denying in part the various motions to dismiss. Following that Order, the SEC filed a Second Amended Complaint (the operative pleading) and the defendants have filed their answers which generally deny liability. At this time, discovery is closed and the SEC has indicated an intent to file a summary judgment motion regarding certain non-fraud claims asserted in its Second Amended Complaint. The defendants have opposed the SEC’s request to file such motion(s). The Court conducted a hearing on February 23, 2021 and set an initial briefing schedule for the SEC’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment wherein the Plaintiffs’ Motion for Partial Summary Judgment was due on April 5, 2021, the Defendants’ Consolidated (i.e., collectively, Nutra Pharma Corporation, Erik “Rik” Deitsch, and Sean McManus) Response Brief to the SEC’s Motion is due May 3, 2021, and the Plaintiffs’ Reply Brief is due on May 19, 2021.  On March 23, 2021, the Plaintiff filed a Motion for Extension of Time to file the Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. On March 24, 2021, the Court entered an order granting the Motion for Extension of Time and modified the briefing schedule as follows: Plaintiffs’ Motion is due on or before April 9, 2021, the Defendants’ Response is due on or before May 7, 2021, and the Plaintiffs’ Reply is due on or before May 21, 2021. Nutra Pharma disputes the allegations in this lawsuit and intendscontinues to vigorously defend against the lawsuit. Nutra Pharma is informed bySEC’s claims. Mr. Deitsch and Mr. McManus that they also intend to dohave similarly defended the same. Nutra Pharmalawsuit since its filing and each contest liability. The Company does not believe that it engaged in any fraudulent activity or made any material misrepresentations concerning Nutra Pharmathe Company and/or its products.


CSA 8411, LLC v. Nutra Pharma Corp., Case No. CACE 18-023150


On October 12, 2018, CSA 8411, LLC filed a lawsuit against Nutra Pharma Corp. (“Defendant”) in the 17th Judicial Circuit Court in and for Broward County, Florida (Case No. CACE 18-023150) to recover $100,000.00 allegedly owed under an amended promissory note dated April 12, 2017. On November 1, 2018, the Defendants filed their Answer and Affirmative Defenses to the Complaint. Notably, CSA 8411, LLC is owned by the same individual that is the majority owner of Get Credit Healthy, Inc. Defendant believes that this lawsuit, just like the lawsuit filed by Get Credit Healthy, Inc., is without merit. Moreover, Defendant believes that it has a number of valid defenses to this claim. Among other things, the owner of CSA 8411, LLC violated the terms of a Binding Memorandum of Understanding by failing to invest in Nutra Pharma Corp. and fraudulently inducing Defendant to enter into the subject amended promissory note. Defendant intends to file a third-party complaint against the owner of CSA 8411, LLC for his misrepresentations and to vigorously contest this matter. As of yet, counsel for CSA 8411, LLC has not reached out to us to set mediation. However, given the fact that the claims at issue involve the same underlying facts as the claims at issue in the lawsuit filed by Get Credit Healthy, Inc., we anticipate that both matters will be set for mediation at the same time. At September 30, 2018, we owed principal balance of $91,156 and accrued interest of $16,253.


Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds


Common Stock Issued with Indebtedness


In August 2018, in connection with a notes payable, we issued a total of 5,000,000 shares of our common stock with a fair value of $3,800.


During October 2018, we issued convertible notes to an unrelated third parties for $40,000May 2019, the Notes of $48,000 with original issuance discount of $8,000.$8,000 amended in October 2018 were restated. In connection with the issuance of thethis restated note, we issued a total 6,000,0003,000,000 shares of our common stock. The common stock was valued at $900.


During May 2019, the Notes of $24,000 with original issuance discount of $4,000 amended in November 2018 were restated. In connection with this restated note, we issued 3,000,000 shares of our common stock. The common stock was valued at $900.

During September 2019, the Notes of $282,983 plus accrued interest amended in December 2018 were restated. The restated principal balance of $333,543 were due September 2020. In connection with this restated note, we issued 20,000,000 shares of our common stock. The common stock was valued at $5,090.

Common Stock Issued for Conversion of Convertible Debt


During JulyMay 2019 through September 2018,February 2020, the Note holder made conversions ofreceived a total of 206,988,5701,250,000,000 shares of our restricted common stock with a fair value of $182,553 in satisfaction of the remaining principal balance $86,000 and accrued interest in full from$275,000 of a Note originated in February 2018.2019. During February through March 2021, the Note holder received an additional 205,080,000 shares of our restricted common stock in satisfaction the $102,540 of the Note.



43 

During August 2018,September 2020, a Note holder received a total of 300,000,000107,133,333 shares of our restricted common stock in satisfaction of the principal balance of $72,000 with$22,000 and accrued interest in full forof $10,140 from a Note originated in July 2016.


March 2018. During September 2018,October 2020, the Note holder madereceived a conversionstotal of 52,244,433107,817,770 shares of our restricted common stock in satisfaction of the principal balance of $22,000 and accrued interest of $10,345 from a Note originated in March 2018.

During November 2020, the Note received a total of 100,000,000 shares of our restricted common stock in satisfaction the $20,000 of the Note amended in January 2019 with a fair value of $37,011 in satisfaction of principal balance of $15,000 and accrued interest in full from a Note originated in February 2018.$120,000.


Common Stock Issued for Conversion of Promissory Note


During August 2018, a Note holder received a total of 145,000,0002019, in connection with the settlement, we issued 1,500,000 shares of our restricted common stockstocks with a fair value of $101,500 in satisfaction of$450 for the Note of $60,000$12,000 with original issuance discount of $2,000 originated in December 2017 in full.  We recorded a loss on settlement of debt in other expense for $41,500.2019.


Common Stock Issued for Account Payable


During August 2018, the Company issuedDecember 2019, two Notes for a total of 2,800,000$9,900 with original issuance discount of $900 originated in February 2018 were settled with 40,000,000 shares of the Company’s restricted stock to settle the outstanding fees of $4,200 with a vendor. We recorded a gain on settlement of accounts payable in other expense for $1,400.


Common Stock Issued for Settlement of Default Penalty


During February, 2018, in connection with the settlement of a default penalty of debt, we issued 34,535,940 shares of our common stock with a fair value of $48,350 to the Note holder.


Common Stock Issued for Debt Modification


During July through September, 2018, we issued a total of 27,625,000 restricted shares to 13 Note holders due to the default on repayment of the promissory notes.stocks. The shares were valued at fair value of $23,815.$24,000.

During December 2019, three Notes for a total of $49,684 with original issuance discount of $2,700 originated in May 2017, January and September 2018, respectively, were settled with 260,000,000 shares of common stocks. The shares were valued at fair value of $130,000.

During December 2019, two Notes for a total of $46,500 originated in October and November 2018 and the accounts payable of $39,000 for consulting fees were settled with 500,000,000 shares of common stocks. The shares were valued at fair value of $300,000.

During March 2020, $50,000 of the Note of $120,000 with original issuance discount of 20,000 originated in November 2017 was settled for 125,000,000 shares. An additional 36,000,000 shares were issued to satisfy the default provision of the original note, and 10,000,000 shares were issued along with the restatement. The total fair value of issued stock was $119,700.

During February 2021, we issued 29,072,500 shares of common stock to satisfy the accrued interest of $23,258 with fair value of $343,056 for the Note with principal balance of $166,926 restated in July 2020.

Common Stock Issued for Default Payments

During May 2019, we issued a total of 3,000,000 restricted shares to two Note holders due to the default on repayments of the convertible note of $48,000 originated in October 2018 and $24,000 originated in November 2018. The shares were valued at fair value of $900.

During August 2019, we issued a total of 2,000,000 additional restricted shares to two Note holders due to the default on repayments. The shares were valued at fair value of $700.

During June 2019, we issued a total of 500,000 restricted shares to a Note holder due to the default on repayments of the convertible note of $12,000 originated in December 2018. The shares were valued at fair value of $150.

During July 2019, we issued a total of 5,000,000 restricted shares to a Note holder due to the default on repayments of the promissory note of $282,983 plus accrued interest amended in December 2018. The shares were valued at fair value of $1,500.

During September 2019, we issued a total of 10,000,000 restricted shares to a Note holder due to the default on repayments of the original issuance discount of $10,000 for the convertible promissory notes of $60,000 amended in November 2018. The shares were valued at fair value of $4,000.

During January 2020, we issued a total of 75,000,000 restricted shares to a Note holder due to the default on repayments of the convertible promissory note of a total of $148,225 amended in August and November 2018. The shares were valued at fair value of $45,000.

During July 2020, we issued a total of 1,000,000 restricted shares to a Note holder due to the default on repayments of the promissory note of $22,000 originated in December 2019. The shares were valued at fair value of $700.

44 

During September 2020, we issued a total of 10,000,000 restricted shares to a Note holder due to the default on repayments of the promissory note of $333,543 plus accrued interest amended in September 2019. The shares were valued at fair value of $6,000.

During October 2020, we issued a total of 1,500,000 restricted shares to a Note holder due to the default on repayments of the promissory note of $84,000 amended in March 2020. The shares were valued at fair value of $900.

During January 2021, we issued a total of 25,000,000 restricted shares to a Note holder due to the default on repayments of the promissory note of $166,926 amended in July 2020. The shares were valued at fair value of $107,500.

Common Stock Issued for Services

During April 2019, we signed an agreement with a consultant to provide investor relation services for twelve months. In connection with the agreement, 120,000,000 shares of our restricted common stock were issued. The shares were valued at $24,000.

During June 2019, we signed an agreement with a consultant to provide investor relation services for twelve months. In connection with the agreement, 15,000,000 shares of our restricted common stock were issued. The shares were valued at $6,000.

Settlement of a Related-Party Note

During June 2020, the Note of $14,400 with original issuance discount of $2,400 to a related party amended in December 2018 was settled with cash payment of $14,400 and 5,000,000 shares of common stocks. The shares were valued at fair value of $3,000.


Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities


Debt owed to a Director

During 2010, we borrowed $200,000 from one of our directors. Under the terms of the loan agreement, this loan was expected to be repaid in nine months to a year from the date of the loan along with interest calculated at 10% for the first month plus 12% after 30 days from funding. We are in default regarding this loan. The loan is under personal guarantee by Mr. Deitsch. We repaid principal balance in full as of December 31, 2016. At SeptemberJune 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018, we owed this director accrued interest of $137,645, which is included in accrued expenses in the condensed consolidated balance sheets


In August 2016, we issued two Promissory Notes for a total of $200,000 ($100,000 each) to one of our directors’ owned Companies. The notes carry interest at 12% annually$150,372 and are due on the date that is nine-months from the execution and funding of the note. Upon default in February 2017, the Notes became convertible at $0.008 per share. During March 2017, we repaid principal balance of $6,365.  During April 2017, the Notes with accrued interest were restated. The restated principal balance of $201,818 bears interest at 12% annually and was due October 12, 2017. During June 2017, we repaid principal balance of $8,844. The loan is in default and negotiation for settlement. At September 30, 2018, we owed principal balance of $192,974 and accrued interest of $34,196.$141,808.


In April 2016, we issued a promissory note to an unrelated third party in the amount of $10,000 bearing interest at 10% annually. The note was due in one year from the execution and funding of the note. The loan is in default and negotiation of settlement. At September 30, 2018, the accrued interest is $2,483.


In May 2016, the Company issued a promissory note to an unrelated third party in the amount of $75,000 bearing monthly interest at a rate of 2%. The note was due in six months from the execution and funding of the note. During April, we accepted the offer of a settlement to issue 5,000,000 common shares as a repayment of $25,000. The loan is in default and in negotiation of settlement. At September 30, 2018, the accrued interest is $34,734.


In June 2016, the Company issued a promissory note to an unrelated third party in the amount of $50,000 bearing monthly interest at a rate of 2%. The note was due in six months from the execution and funding of the note. The loan is in default and negotiation of settlement. At September 30, 2018, the accrued interest is $27,933.


During January 2018, the Notes of $180,250 with accrued interest were restated. The restated principal balance of $220,506 bears monthly interest at a rate of 2.5% and was due July 12, 2018. The loan is in default and negotiation of settlement. At September 30, 2018, the accrued interest is $48,145.


On September 26, 2016, we issued a promissory note to an unrelated third party in the amount of $75,000 bearing interest at 10% annually. The note was due in one year from the execution and funding of the note. The loan is in default and in negotiation of settlement. At September 30, 2018, the accrued interest is $15,354.


In October 2016, we issued a promissory note to an unrelated third party in the amount of $50,000 bearing monthly interest at a rate of 2%. The note was due in six months from the execution and funding of the note. The loan is in default and in negotiation of settlement. At September 30, 2018, the accrued interest is $24,233.



In June 2017, we issued a promissory note to an unrelated third party in the amount of $12,500 bearing interest at 10% annually. The note was due in one year from the execution and funding of the note. The loan is in default and in negotiation of settlement. At September 30, 2018, the accrued interest is $1,625.

In July 2017, we issued a promissory note to an unrelated third party in the amount of $50,000 with original issue discount of $10,000. The note was due in six months from the execution and funding of the note. The original issuance discount was fully amortized as of September 30, 2018. The loan is in default and in negotiation of settlement. At September 30, 2018, the principal balance of the loan is $50,000.

In September 2017, we issued a promissory note to an unrelated third party in the amount of $36,000 with original issue discount of $6,000. The note was due in one year from the execution and funding of the note. The original issue discount has been fully amortized at September 30, 2018. Repayments of $1,500 and $5,000 have been made in 2017 and nine months ended September 30, 2018, respectively. The loan is in default and in negotiation of settlement. At September 30, 2018, the principal balance of the loan is $29,500.

In October 2017, we issued a promissory note to an unrelated third party in the amount of $60,000 with original issuance discount of $10,000. The note was due in six months from the execution and funding of the note. The debt discounts were fully amortized as of September 30, 2018. The loan is in default and in negotiation of settlement. At September 30, 2018, the principal balance of the loan net of discount is $60,000.

In November 2017, we issued a promissory note to an unrelated third party in the amount of $120,000 with original issuance discount of $20,000. The note was due in six months from the execution and funding of the note. The loan is in default and in negotiation of settlement. At September 30, 2018, the principal balance of the loan is $120,000.

In November 2017, we issued a promissory note to an unrelated third party in the amount of $18,000 with original issuance discount of $3,000. The note was due in six months from the execution and funding of the note. The loan is in default and in negotiation of settlement. At September 30, 2018, the principal balance of the loan is $18,000.

On March 19, 2014, we issued two Convertible Debentures in the amount of up to $500,000 each (total $1,000,000) to two non-related parties. The first tranche of $15,000 each (total $30,000) of the funds was received during the first quarter of 2014.  The notes carry interest at 8% and were due on March 19, 2018.  The note holders have the right to convert the notes into shares of Common Stock at a price of $0.20. The loan is in default and in negotiation of settlement. During the three months ended September 30, 2018, repayment of $3,000 was made. At September 30, 2018, the principal balance of the loan is $27,000.

On March 28, 2016, we signed an expansion agreement with Brewer and Associates Consulting, LLC (“B+A”) to the original consulting agreement dated on October 15, 2015 for consulting services for twelve months for a monthly fee of $7,000. To relieve our cash obligation of $36,000 per original agreement, we issued three convertible notes for a total of $120,000 which includes the fees due under the original agreement and the new monthly fees due under the expansion agreement. The $100,000 of the Notes were paid in full as of December 31, 2017. The remaining balance of $20,000 Notes to B+A is in default and in negotiation of settlement.

During January through March 2018, the convertible notes payable for a total of $99,150 to the seven unrelated third parties were due in six months from the execution and funding of each note. The notes are convertible into shares of Company’s common stock at a conversion price ranging from $0.0005 to $0.001 per share. At September 30, 2018, the principal balance of the loan of $99,150 are in default and in negotiation of settlement.

 

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures

 

Not applicable.

 

Item 5. Other Information

 

None

 

Item 6. Exhibits

 

Exhibit No.Title

Exhibit No.

31.1

Title

31.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes–Oxley Act of 2002.

32.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes–Oxley Act of 2002.

101.INS

XBRL Instance Document

101.SCH

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document

101.CAL

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document

101.DEF

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document

101.LAB

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document

101.PRE

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document



45 

SIGNATURES


In accordance with the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.


NUTRA PHARMA CORP.

Registrant

Dated: November 19, 2018

May 7, 2021

/s/ Rik J. Deitsch

Rik J. Deitsch

Chief Executive Officer/Chief Financial Officer



32