UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
xQuarterly report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2017March 31, 2019
or
¨Transition report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
For the transition period from                     to  
Commission File Number: 000-55106
BBVA Compass Bancshares, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Texas 20-8948381
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
 (I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
 
2200 Post Oak Blvd. Houston, Texas 77056
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)
 (205) 297-3000 
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically, and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, smaller reporting company or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and "emerging growth company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer o
 
Accelerated filer o
 
Non-accelerated filer þ (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
 
Smaller reporting company o
 
Emerging growth company o
   
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No þ
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: None
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.
Class Outstanding as of October 31, 2017April 26, 2019
Common Stock (par value $0.01 per share) 222,950,751222,963,891 shares

Explanatory Note
The registrant meets the conditions set forth in General Instruction H(1)(a) and (b) of Form 10-Q and is therefore filing this report with certain reduced disclosures as permitted by those instructions.

     

TABLE OF CONTENTS

  Page
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 




Glossary of Acronyms and Terms

The following listing provides a comprehensive reference of common acronyms and terms used throughout the document:
AFSAvailable For Sale
ASCAccounting Standards Codification
ASUAccounting Standards Update
Basel IIIGlobal regulatory framework developed by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision
BankCompass Bank
BBVABanco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria, S.A.
BBVA CompassRegistered trade name of Compass Bank
BBVA GroupBBVA and its consolidated subsidiaries
BOLIBank Owned Life Insurance
BSIBBVA Securities Inc.
Capital SecuritiesDebentures issued by the Parent
Cash Flow HedgeA hedge of a forecasted transaction or of the variability of cash flows to be received or paid related to a recognized asset or liability
CD    Certificate of Deposit and/or time deposits
CET1Common Equity Tier 1
CET1 Risk-Based Capital RatioRatio of Common Equity Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets
CFPB    Consumer Financial Protection Bureau
CompanyBBVA Compass Bancshares, Inc. and its subsidiaries
Covered AssetsLoans and other real estate owned acquired from the FDIC subject to loss sharing agreements
Covered LoansLoans acquired from the FDIC subject to loss sharing agreements
CRACommunity Reinvestment Act
EGRRCPAEconomic Growth Regulatory Relief and Consumer Protection Act
ERMEnterprise Risk Management
EVEEconomic Value of Equity
Exchange ActSecurities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended
Fair Value HedgeA hedge of the fair value of a recognized asset or liability or of an unrecognized firm commitment
FASB    Financial Accounting Standards Board
FBO Tailoring ProposalsFederal banking agencies proposed rules that would adjust the thresholds at which certain enhanced prudential standards and Basel III capital and liquidity requirements apply to FBOs and the U.S. IHCs of FBOs pursuant to the EGRRCPA
FDICFederal Deposit Insurance Corporation
Federal Reserve BoardBoard of Governors of the Federal Reserve System
FHCFinancial holding company
FHLB    Federal Home Loan Bank
FICOFair Isaac Corporation
FitchFitch Ratings
FNMA    Federal National Mortgage Association
Guaranty BankCollectively, certain assets and liabilities of Guaranty Bank, acquired by the Company in 2009
HTMHeld To Maturity
HVCREHigh-volatility commercial real estate
HVCRE ADCHVCRE acquisition development or construction
Large FBOForeign Banking Organization with $100 billion or more in global total consolidated assets
LCRLiquidity Coverage Ratio
Leverage RatioRatio of Tier 1 capital to quarterly average on-balance sheet assets
Moody'sMoody's Investor Services, Inc.
MRAMaster Repurchase Agreement

MSRMortgage Servicing Rights
OCCOffice of the Comptroller of the Currency
OREOOther Real Estate Owned
OTTI    Other-Than-Temporary Impairment

OISOvernight Index Swap
ParentBBVA Compass Bancshares, Inc.
Potential Problem LoansCommercial loans rated substandard or below, which do not meet the definition of nonaccrual, TDR, or 90 days past due and still accruing
Resolution Plan ProposalFederal Reserve Board and FDIC proposed rule that would reduce or eliminate resolution planning requirements for institutions that fall into certain risk-based categories
SBASmall Business Administration
SBICSmall Business Investment Company
SECSecurities and Exchange Commission
S&PStandard and Poor's Rating Services
Series A Preferred StockFloating Non-Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock, Series A
SOFRSecured Overnight Financing Rate
S&PStandard and Poor's Rating Services
Tax Cuts and Jobs ActH.R. 1, formerly known as the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017
TBATo be announced
TDRTroubled Debt Restructuring
Tier 1 Risk-Based Capital RatioRatio of Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets
Total Risk-Based Capital RatioRatio of Total capital (the sum of Tier 1 capital and Tier 2 capital) to risk-weighted assets
U.S.United States of America
U.S. TreasuryUnited States Department of the Treasury
U.S. GAAPAccounting principles generally accepted in the U.S.

Unless otherwise specified, the terms “we,” “us,” “our,” and the “Company” are used to refer to BBVA Compass Bancshares, Inc. and its subsidiaries, or any one or more of them, as the context may require. The term “Parent” refers to BBVA Compass Bancshares, Inc. The term “BBVA” refers to Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria, S.A., the parent company of BBVA Compass Bancshares, Inc.
Forward-Looking Statements
This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements about the Company and its industry that involve substantial risks and uncertainties. Statements other than statements of current or historical fact, including statements regarding the Company's future financial condition, results of operations, business plans, liquidity, cash flows, projected costs, and the impact of any laws or regulations applicable to the Company, are forward-looking statements. Words such as “anticipates,” “believes,” “estimates,” “expects,” “forecasts,” “intends,” “plans,” “projects,” “may,” “will,” “should,” and other similar expressions are intended to identify these forward-looking statements. Such statements are subject to factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from anticipated results. Such factors include, but are not limited to, the following:
national, regional and local economic conditions may be less favorable than expected, resulting in, among other things, increased charge-offs of loans, higher provisions for credit losses and/or reduced demand for the Company's services;
disruptions to the credit and financial markets, either nationally or globally;
weaknessdecline in the real estate market, including the secondary residential mortgage market, which can affect, among other things,values or overall economic weakness could also have an adverse impact upon the value of collateral securing mortgage loans, mortgagereal estate or other assets which the Company owns as a result of foreclosing a loan originations and delinquencies, and profitsits ability to realize value on sales of mortgage loans;such assets;
legislative, regulatory or accounting changes, which may adversely affect our business and/or competitive position, impose additional costs on the Company or cause us to change our business practices;
the fiscal and monetary policies of the federal government and its agencies;
the impact of consumer protection regulations, including the CFPB's residential mortgage and other retail lending regulations, which could adversely affect the Company's business, financial condition or results of operations;
the failure to satisfy capital adequacy and liquidity guidelines applicable to the Company;
volatile or declining oil prices, which could have a negative impact on the economies and real estate markets of states such as Texas, resulting in, among other things, higher delinquencies and increased charge-offs in the energy lending portfolio as well as other commercial and consumer loan portfolios indirectly impacted by declining oil prices;
ifa failure by the Bank's CRA rating wereCompany to decline, that could resulteffectively manage the risks the Company faces, including credit, operational and cyber security risks;
failure to control concentration risk such as loan type, industry segment, borrower type or location of the borrower or collateral;
changes in certain restrictions onthe creditworthiness of customers;
downgrades to the Company's activities;credit ratings;
changes in interest rates which could affect interest rate spreads and net interest income;
costs and effects of litigation, regulatory investigations, examinations or similar matters;
disruptions in the Company's ability to access capital markets, which may adversely affect its capital resources and liquidity;
increased loan losses or impairment of goodwill;
the Company's heavy reliance on communications and information systems to conduct its business and reliance on third parties and affiliates to provide key components of its business infrastructure, any disruptions of which could interrupt the Company's operations or increase the costs of doing business;
that negative public opinion, which could damage the Company's reputation and adversely impact business and revenues;
the Company depends on the expertise of key personnel, and if these individuals leave or change their roles without effective replacements, operations may suffer;
the Company's financial reporting controls and procedures may not prevent or detect all errors or fraud;
the Company is subject to certain risks related to originating and selling mortgages. It may be required to repurchase mortgage loans or indemnify mortgage loan purchases as a result of breaches of representations and warranties, borrower fraud or certain breaches of its servicing agreements, and this could harm the Company's liquidity, results of operations and financial condition;
the Company's dependence on the accuracy and completeness of information about clients and counterparties;
the fiscal and monetary policies of the federal government and its agencies;
the failure to satisfy capital adequacy and liquidity guidelines applicable to the Company;
downgrades to the Company's credit ratings;
changes in interest rates which could affect interest rate spreads and net interest income;
costs and effects of litigation, regulatory investigations or similar matters;
a failure by the Company to effectively manage the risks the Company faces, including credit, operational and cyber security risks;
increased pressures from competitors (both banks and non-banks) and/or an inability by the Company to remain competitive in the financial services industry, particularly in the markets which the Company serves, and keep pace with technological changes;
unpredictable natural or other disasters, which could impact the Company's customers or operations;
a loss of customer deposits, which could increase the Company's funding costs;

the impact that can result from having loans concentrated by loan type, industry segment, borrower type or locationCompany's dependence on the accuracy and completeness of the borrower or collateral;information about clients and counterparties;
changes in the creditworthiness of customers;
increased loan lossesCompany's accounting policies or impairment of goodwill and other intangibles;
potential changes in interchange fees;
negative public opinion,accounting standards which could damagematerially affect how the Company's reputationCompany reports financial results and adversely impact business and revenues;condition;
the Company has in the past and may in the future pursue acquisitions, which could affect costs and from which the Company may not be able to realize anticipated benefits;
the Company depends on the expertise of key personnel, and if these individuals leave or change their roles without effective replacements, operations may suffer;
the Company may not be able to hire or retain additional qualified personnel and recruiting and compensation costs may increase as a result of turnover, both of which may increase costs and reduce profitability and may adversely impact the Company's ability to implement the Company's business strategies; and
changes in the Company's accounting policies or in accounting standards which could materially affect how the Company reports financial results and condition.strategies.
The forward-looking statements in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q speak only as of the time they are made and do not necessarily reflect the Company’s outlook at any other point in time. The Company undertakes no obligation to update publicly any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or for any other reason. However, readers should carefully review the risk factors set forth in other reports or documents the Company files periodically with the SEC.




PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1.Financial Statements (Unaudited)
BBVA COMPASS BANCSHARES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Unaudited)
BBVA COMPASS BANCSHARES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Unaudited)
BBVA COMPASS BANCSHARES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Unaudited)
September 30, 2017 December 31, 2016March 31, 2019 December 31, 2018
(In Thousands)(In Thousands)
Assets:      
Cash and due from banks$1,145,745
 $1,284,261
$1,143,541
 $1,217,319
Interest bearing funds with the Federal Reserve2,400,533
 1,830,078
Federal funds sold, securities purchased under agreements to resell and interest bearing deposits188,380
 137,447
4,864,920
 2,115,307
Cash and cash equivalents3,734,658
 3,251,786
6,008,461
 3,332,626
Trading account assets572,104
 3,144,600
306,123
 237,656
Investment securities available for sale12,268,309
 11,665,055
Investment securities held to maturity (fair value of $1,067,919 and $1,182,009 at September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively)1,077,372
 1,203,217
Loans held for sale, (includes $77,783 and $105,257 measured at fair value for September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively)77,783
 161,849
Debt securities available for sale9,297,018
 10,981,216
Debt securities held to maturity (fair value of $4,654,927 and $2,925,420 at March 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, respectively)4,575,041
 2,885,613
Loans held for sale ($76,938 and $68,766 at fair value at March 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, respectively)1,273,821
 68,766
Loans60,315,204
 60,061,263
63,757,545
 65,186,554
Allowance for loan losses(849,119) (838,293)(966,022) (885,242)
Net loans59,466,085
 59,222,970
62,791,523
 64,301,312
Premises and equipment, net1,226,747
 1,300,054
1,125,676
 1,152,958
Bank owned life insurance720,693
 711,939
740,764
 736,171
Goodwill4,983,296
 4,983,296
4,983,296
 4,983,296
Other assets1,556,613
 1,435,187
2,740,863
 2,267,560
Total assets$85,683,660
 $87,079,953
$93,842,586
 $90,947,174
Liabilities:      
Deposits:      
Noninterest bearing$21,094,235
 $20,332,792
$20,403,716
 $20,183,876
Interest bearing46,119,332
 46,946,741
53,976,592
 51,984,111
Total deposits67,213,567
 67,279,533
74,380,308
 72,167,987
FHLB and other borrowings3,956,041
 3,001,551
4,011,160
 3,987,590
Federal funds purchased and securities sold under agreements to repurchase44,761
 39,052
188,024
 102,275
Other short-term borrowings327,539
 2,802,977
30,975
 
Accrued expenses and other liabilities1,025,849
 1,206,133
1,504,582
 1,176,793
Total liabilities72,567,757
 74,329,246
80,115,049
 77,434,645
Shareholder’s Equity:      
Series A Preferred stock — $0.01 par value, liquidation preference $200,000 per share      
Authorized — 30,000,000 shares      
Issued — 1,150 shares at both September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016229,475
 229,475
Issued — 1,150 shares at both March 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018229,475
 229,475
Common stock — $0.01 par value:      
Authorized — 300,000,000 shares      
Issued — 222,950,751 shares at both September 30, 2017 and December 31, 20162,230
 2,230
Issued — 222,963,891 and 222,950,751 shares at March 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, respectively2,230
 2,230
Surplus14,912,412
 14,985,673
14,542,166
 14,545,849
Accumulated deficit(1,920,184) (2,327,440)(927,877) (1,107,198)
Accumulated other comprehensive loss(137,583) (168,252)(148,135) (186,848)
Total BBVA Compass Bancshares, Inc. shareholder’s equity13,086,350
 12,721,686
13,697,859
 13,483,508
Noncontrolling interests29,553
 29,021
29,678
 29,021
Total shareholder’s equity13,115,903
 12,750,707
13,727,537
 13,512,529
Total liabilities and shareholder’s equity$85,683,660
 $87,079,953
$93,842,586
 $90,947,174
See accompanying Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

BBVA COMPASS BANCSHARES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(Unaudited)

BBVA COMPASS BANCSHARES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(Unaudited)

BBVA COMPASS BANCSHARES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(Unaudited)

Three Months Ended September 30, Nine Months Ended September 30,Three Months Ended March 31,
2017 2016 2017 20162019 2018
(In Thousands)(In Thousands)
Interest income:          
Interest and fees on loans$623,884
 $557,996
 $1,805,971
 $1,678,249
$800,488
 $663,935
Interest on investment securities available for sale53,930
 48,382
 164,398
 131,021
Interest on investment securities held to maturity6,994
 6,675
 20,454
 20,229
Interest on federal funds sold, securities purchased under agreements to resell and interest bearing deposits11,557
 4,563
 32,868
 13,275
Interest on debt securities available for sale53,522
 56,602
Interest on debt securities held to maturity29,495
 12,426
Interest on trading account assets6,247
 12,926
 26,349
 40,659
539
 750
Interest and dividends on other earning assets22,968
 11,875
Total interest income702,612
 630,542
 2,050,040
 1,883,433
907,012
 745,588
Interest expense:          
Interest on deposits75,083
 76,031
 211,301
 230,779
182,354
 97,347
Interest on FHLB and other borrowings29,904
 21,315
 71,422
 58,919
37,626
 24,756
Interest on federal funds purchased and securities sold under agreements to repurchase4,623
 4,934
 16,462
 16,525
3,747
 536
Interest on other short-term borrowings3,641
 13,453
 24,233
 41,281
196
 344
Total interest expense113,251
 115,733
 323,418
 347,504
223,923
 122,983
Net interest income589,361
 514,809
 1,726,622
 1,535,929
683,089
 622,605
Provision for loan losses103,434
 65,107
 228,858
 265,025
182,292
 57,029
Net interest income after provision for loan losses485,927
 449,702
 1,497,764
 1,270,904
500,797
 565,576
Noninterest income:          
Service charges on deposit accounts55,953
 55,047
 166,040
 158,393
58,908
 56,161
Card and merchant processing fees32,297
 31,256
 94,749
 92,507
46,002
 39,678
Retail investment sales26,817
 30,137
 82,876
 79,689
Investment services sales fees26,696
 30,108
Money transfer income21,981
 20,688
Investment banking and advisory fees30,500
 34,385
 78,744
 86,324
18,857
 23,896
Money transfer income24,881
 25,058
 77,408
 75,960
Asset management fees10,336
 8,778
 30,162
 25,969
10,767
 10,770
Corporate and correspondent investment sales5,145
 6,974
 26,249
 21,490
6,892
 12,056
Mortgage banking3,450
 8,242
 9,636
 5,410
4,937
 8,397
Bank owned life insurance4,322
 4,170
 12,711
 13,041
4,584
 4,215
Investment securities gains, net3,033
 
 3,033
 30,037
8,958
 
Other61,060
 59,718
 167,198
 206,396
49,178
 51,856
Total noninterest income257,794
 263,765
 748,806
 795,216
257,760
 257,825
Noninterest expense:          
Salaries, benefits and commissions279,384
 279,132
 835,825
 836,067
292,716
 289,440
Equipment60,656
 59,697
 184,691
 179,646
65,394
 63,360
Professional services64,775
 63,628
 187,422
 178,396
63,896
 60,645
Net occupancy42,227
 41,610
 125,568
 120,881
40,941
 40,422
Money transfer expense15,938
 16,680
 50,069
 50,048
14,978
 13,721
Amortization of intangibles2,525
 4,093
 7,575
 12,280
Securities impairment:          
Other-than-temporary impairment
 
 242
 281

 571
Less: non-credit portion recognized in other comprehensive income
 
 
 151

 262
Total securities impairment
 
 242
 130

 309
Other108,457
 91,431
 304,367
 312,004
104,048
 95,016
Total noninterest expense573,962
 556,271
 1,695,759
 1,689,452
581,973
 562,913
Net income before income tax expense169,759
 157,196
 550,811
 376,668
176,584
 260,488
Income tax expense39,308
 36,845
 142,097
 94,548
35,603
 51,798
Net income130,451
 120,351
 408,714
 282,120
140,981
 208,690
Less: net income attributable to noncontrolling interests584
 523
 1,458
 1,569
556
 461
Net income attributable to BBVA Compass Bancshares, Inc.129,867
 119,828
 407,256
 280,551
140,425
 208,229
Less: preferred stock dividends3,786
 3,476
 11,034
 10,148
4,485
 3,864
Net income attributable to common shareholder$126,081
 $116,352
 $396,222
 $270,403
$135,940
 $204,365
See accompanying Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

BBVA COMPASS BANCSHARES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(Unaudited)

BBVA COMPASS BANCSHARES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(Unaudited)

BBVA COMPASS BANCSHARES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(Unaudited)

Three Months Ended September 30, Nine Months Ended September 30,Three Months Ended March 31,
2017 2016 2017 20162019 2018
(In Thousands)(In Thousands)
Net income$130,451
 $120,351
 $408,714
 $282,120
$140,981
 $208,690
Other comprehensive income, net of tax:          
Net unrealized holding (losses) gains arising during period from securities available for sale(646) (26,076) 38,919
 65,592
Less: reclassification adjustment for net gains on sale of securities available for sale in net income1,911
 
 1,911
 19,035
Net change in net unrealized holding (losses) gains on securities available for sale(2,557) (26,076) 37,008
 46,557
Change in unamortized net holding losses on investment securities held to maturity999
 1,168
 2,540
 2,924
Less: non-credit related impairment on investment securities held to maturity
 
 
 96
Change in unamortized non-credit related impairment on investment securities held to maturity251
 225
 778
 648
Net change in unamortized holding losses on securities held to maturity1,250
 1,393
 3,318
 3,476
Net unrealized gains (losses) arising during period from debt securities available for sale51,700
 (41,859)
Less: reclassification adjustment for net gains on sale of debt securities available for sale in net income6,834
 
Net change in net unrealized holding gains (losses) on debt securities available for sale44,866
 (41,859)
Change in unamortized net holding losses on debt securities held to maturity1,743
 2,019
Unamortized unrealized net holding losses on debt securities available for sale transferred to debt securities held to maturity
 (30,487)
Less: non-credit related impairment on debt securities held to maturity
 200
Change in unamortized non-credit related impairment on debt securities held to maturity368
 130
Net change in unamortized holding gains (losses) on debt securities held to maturity2,111
 (28,538)
Unrealized holding gains (losses) arising during period from cash flow hedge instruments855
 (1,461) (9,172) 1,728
24,053
 (237)
Change in defined benefit plans
 
 (485) 931
3,119
 (3,379)
Other comprehensive (loss) income, net of tax(452) (26,144) 30,669
 52,692
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax74,149
 (74,013)
Comprehensive income129,999
 94,207
 439,383
 334,812
215,130
 134,677
Less: comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interests584
 523
 1,458
 1,569
556
 461
Comprehensive income attributable to BBVA Compass Bancshares, Inc.$129,415
 $93,684
 $437,925
 $333,243
$214,574
 $134,216
See accompanying Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

BBVA COMPASS BANCSHARES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDER'S EQUITY
(Unaudited)

 Preferred Stock Common Stock Surplus Accumulated Deficit Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss Non-Controlling Interests Total Shareholder’s Equity
 (In Thousands)
Balance, December 31, 2015$229,475
 $2,230
 $15,160,267
 $(2,696,953) $(99,336) $29,026
 $12,624,709
Net income
 
 
 280,551
 
 1,569
 282,120
Other comprehensive income, net of tax
 
 
 
 52,692
 
 52,692
Preferred stock dividends
 
 (10,148) 
 
 (1,037) (11,185)
Common stock dividends
 
 (60,000) 
 
 
 (60,000)
Dividend to BBVA Bancomer USA, Inc.
 
 (69,151) 
 
 
 (69,151)
Capital contribution
 
 
 
 
 36
 36
Vesting of restricted stock
 
 (1,527) 
 
 
 (1,527)
Restricted stock retained to cover taxes
 
 (545) 
 
 
 (545)
Restricted stock tax deficiency
 
 (468) 
 
 
 (468)
Amortization of stock-based deferred compensation
 
 2,509
 
 
 
 2,509
Balance, September 30, 2016$229,475
 $2,230
 $15,020,937
 $(2,416,402) $(46,644) $29,594
 $12,819,190
              
Balance, December 31, 2016$229,475
 $2,230
 $14,985,673
 $(2,327,440) $(168,252) $29,021
 $12,750,707
Net income
 
 
 407,256
 
 1,458
 408,714
Other comprehensive income, net of tax
 
 
 
 30,669
 
 30,669
Preferred stock dividends
 
 (11,034) 
 
 (1,037) (12,071)
Common stock dividends
 
 (60,000) 
 
 
 (60,000)
Capital contribution
 
 
 
 
 111
 111
Vesting of restricted stock
 
 (1,538) 
 
 
 (1,538)
Restricted stock retained to cover taxes
 
 (689) 
 
 
 (689)
Balance, September 30, 2017$229,475
 $2,230
 $14,912,412
 $(1,920,184) $(137,583) $29,553
 $13,115,903
BBVA COMPASS BANCSHARES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDER'S EQUITY
(Unaudited)

 Preferred Stock Common Stock Surplus Accumulated Deficit Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss Non-Controlling Interests Total Shareholder’s Equity
 (In Thousands)
Balance, December 31, 2017$229,475
 $2,230
 $14,818,608
 $(1,868,659) $(197,405) $29,061
 $13,013,310
Cumulative effect from adoption of ASU 2016-01
 
 
 13
 (13) 
 
Balance, January 1, 2018$229,475
 $2,230
 $14,818,608
 $(1,868,646) $(197,418) $29,061
 $13,013,310
Net income
 
 
 208,229
 
 461
 208,690
Other comprehensive loss, net of tax
 
 
 
 (74,013) 
 (74,013)
Preferred stock dividends
 
 (3,864) 
 
 
 (3,864)
Capital contribution
 
 
 
 
 16
 16
Balance, March 31, 2018$229,475
 $2,230
 $14,814,744
 $(1,660,417) $(271,431) $29,538
 $13,144,139
              
Balance, December 31, 2018$229,475
 $2,230
 $14,545,849
 $(1,107,198) $(186,848) $29,021
 $13,512,529
Cumulative effect adjustment related to ASU adoptions (1)
 
 
 38,896
 (35,436) 
 3,460
Balance, January 1, 2019$229,475
 $2,230
 $14,545,849
 $(1,068,302) $(222,284) $29,021
 $13,515,989
Net income
 
 
 140,425
 
 556
 140,981
Other comprehensive income, net of tax
 
 
 
 74,149
 
 74,149
Issuance of common stock
 
 802
 
 
 
 802
Preferred stock dividends
 
 (4,485) 
 
 
 (4,485)
Capital contribution
 
 
 
 
 101
 101
Balance, March 31, 2019$229,475
 $2,230
 $14,542,166
 $(927,877) $(148,135) $29,678
 $13,727,537
(1)
Related to the Company's adoption of ASU 2016-02, ASU 2017-12 and ASU 2018-02 on January 1, 2019. See Note 1, Basis of Presentation, for additional information.

See accompanying Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.


BBVA COMPASS BANCSHARES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
 Nine Months Ended September 30,
 2017 2016
 (In Thousands)
Operating Activities:   
Net income$408,714
 $282,120
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:   
Depreciation and amortization222,467
 221,975
Securities impairment242
 130
Amortization of intangibles7,575
 12,280
Accretion of discount, loan fees and purchase market adjustments, net(11,346) (17,191)
Net change in FDIC indemnification liability22
 4,180
Gain on termination of FDIC shared loss agreement(1,779) 
Provision for loan losses228,858
 265,025
Amortization of stock based compensation
 2,509
Net change in trading account assets119,641
 (369,690)
Net change in trading account liabilities(66,800) 210,554
Net change in loans held for sale27,645
 (27,468)
Deferred tax expense (benefit)31,200
 (22,596)
Investment securities gains, net(3,033) (30,037)
Loss on sale of premises and equipment2,468
 5,019
Gain on sale of loans
 (15,551)
Net loss (gain) on sale of other real estate and other assets1,606
 (406)
Increase in other assets(195,868) (260,823)
Increase in other liabilities7,059
 68,043
Net cash provided by operating activities778,671
 328,073
Investing Activities:   
Proceeds from sales of investment securities available for sale210,906
 1,785,313
Proceeds from prepayments, maturities and calls of investment securities available for sale2,082,636
 1,629,841
Purchases of investment securities available for sale(2,902,214) (3,848,779)
Proceeds from prepayments, maturities and calls of investment securities held to maturity137,480
 114,689
Purchases of investment securities held to maturity(6,233) (27,104)
Proceeds from sales of trading securities2,762,293
 729,218
Purchases of trading securities(309,438) (272,857)
Net change in loan portfolio(604,297) (66,962)
Proceeds from sales of loans175,088
 1,022,579
Purchase of premises and equipment(81,590) (112,419)
Proceeds from sale of premises and equipment2,064
 6,311
(Payments to) reimbursements from FDIC for covered assets(2,832) 878
Net cash paid to the FDIC for termination of shared loss agreement(131,603) 
Proceeds from sales of other real estate owned22,650
 21,145
Net cash provided by investing activities1,354,910
 981,853
Financing Activities:   
Net (decrease) increase in demand deposits, NOW accounts and savings accounts(119,583) 1,380,456
Net increase in time deposits44,704
 215,262
Net increase (decrease) in federal funds purchased and securities sold under agreements to repurchase5,709
 (584,581)
Net decrease in other short-term borrowings(2,475,438) (441,421)
Proceeds from FHLB and other borrowings9,245,563
 1,250,000
Repayment of FHLB and other borrowings(8,277,477) (3,057,407)
Capital contribution for non-controlling interest111
 36
Vesting of restricted stock(1,538) (1,527)
Restricted stock grants retained to cover taxes(689) (545)
Dividend paid to BBVA Bancomer USA, Inc.
 (69,151)
Common dividends paid(60,000) (60,000)
Preferred dividends paid(12,071) (11,185)
Net cash used in financing activities(1,650,709) (1,380,063)
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents482,872
 (70,137)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year3,251,786
 4,496,828
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period$3,734,658
 $4,426,691
BBVA COMPASS BANCSHARES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
 Three Months Ended March 31,
 2019 2018
 (In Thousands)
Operating Activities:   
Net income$140,981
 $208,690
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:   
Depreciation and amortization85,705
 68,104
Securities impairment
 309
Amortization of intangibles
 1,592
Accretion of discount, loan fees and purchase market adjustments, net(13,557) (16,747)
Provision for loan losses182,292
 57,029
Net change in trading account assets(68,467) 4,031
Net change in trading account liabilities(30,075) 30,102
Originations and purchases of mortgage loans held for sale(127,894) (141,761)
Sale of mortgage loans held for sale124,857
 135,999
Deferred tax expense666
 830
Investment securities gains, net(8,958) 
Net gain on sale of premises and equipment(1,297) (668)
Loss on sale of loans78
 
Gain on sale of mortgage loans held for sale(5,135) (3,529)
Net loss (gain) on sale of other real estate and other assets1,305
 (744)
Increase in other assets(177,149) (151,479)
Increase in other liabilities46,979
 76,980
Net cash provided by operating activities150,331
 268,738
Investing Activities:   
Proceeds from sales of debt securities available for sale1,446,776
 
Proceeds from prepayments, maturities and calls of debt securities available for sale1,065,045
 794,564
Purchases of debt securities available for sale(772,086) (1,136,063)
Proceeds from sales of equity securities165,495
 228,497
Purchases of equity securities(168,209) (205,007)
Proceeds from prepayments, maturities and calls of debt securities held to maturity88,119
 48,824
Purchases of debt securities held to maturity(1,779,789) 
Net change in loan portfolio(7,043) (648,254)
Proceeds from sales of loans144,596
 8,475
Purchases of premises and equipment(31,735) (23,318)
Proceeds from sales of premises and equipment1,543
 1,051
Proceeds from settlement of BOLI policies
 2,237
Cash payments for premiums of BOLI policies(9) (9)
Proceeds from sales of other real estate owned7,115
 6,611
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities159,818
 (922,392)
Financing Activities:   
Net increase in demand deposits, NOW accounts and savings accounts1,960,945
 762,147
Net increase (decrease) in time deposits254,278
 (78,994)
Net increase (decrease) in federal funds purchased and securities sold under agreements to repurchase85,749
 (13,658)
Net increase in other short-term borrowings30,975
 12,003
Proceeds from FHLB and other borrowings3,840,000
 4,700,000
Repayment of FHLB and other borrowings(3,840,055) (5,300,052)
Capital contribution for non-controlling interest101
 16
Issuance of common stock802
 
Preferred dividends paid(4,485) (3,864)
Net cash provided by financing activities2,328,310
 77,598
Net increase (decrease) in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash2,638,459
 (576,056)
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash at beginning of year3,501,380
 4,270,950
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash at end of period$6,139,839
 $3,694,894
See accompanying Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

11

Table of Contents
BBVA COMPASS BANCSHARES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


(1) Basis of Presentation
General
The accounting and reporting policies of the Company and the methods of applying those policies that materially affect the consolidated financial statements conform with U.S. GAAP and with general financial services industry practices. The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements include the accounts of BBVA Compass Bancshares, Inc. and its subsidiaries and have been prepared in conformity with U.S. GAAP for interim financial information and in accordance with the instructions to Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X as promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission. In the opinion of management, all adjustments, consisting of normal and recurring items, necessary for the fair presentation of the condensed consolidated financial statements have been included. Operating results for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017,March 31, 2019, are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ended December 31, 2017.2019. These interim financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016.2018.
The Company has evaluated subsequent events for potential recognition and disclosure through the filing date of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q to determine if either recognition or disclosure of significant events or transactions is required.
Use of Estimates in the Preparation of Consolidated Financial Statements
The preparation of consolidated financial statements in accordance with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period, the most significant of which relate to the allowance for loan losses, goodwill impairment, fair value measurements and income taxes. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Recently Adopted Accounting Standards
Stock Compensation
In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-09, Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting. The FASB issued this ASU to improve the accounting for share-based payment transactions as part of its simplification initiative. The areas for simplification in this ASU involve several aspects of the accounting for share-based payment transactions, including the income tax consequences, classification of awards as either equity or liabilities, and classification on the statement of cash flows. The amendments in this ASU were effective for annual periods, and interim periods within those annual periods, beginning after December 15, 2016. The adoption of this standard did not have an impact on the financial condition or results of operations of the Company.
Recently Issued Accounting Standards Not Yet Adopted
Revenue from Contracts with Customers
In May 2014, the FASB released ASU 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers. The core principle of this codified guidance requires an entity to recognize revenue upon the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. The amendments in this ASU were originally effective for annual periods, and interim periods within those annual periods, beginning after December 15, 2016. Subsequently, the FASB issued a one-year deferral for implementation, which results in the new guidance being effective for annual and interim reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017. Because the guidance does not apply to revenue associated with financial instruments, including loans and securities accounted for under other U.S. GAAP, the Company does not expect the new revenue recognition guidance to have a material impact on the elements of its statement of income most closely associated with financial instruments, including securities gains, interest income and interest expense. The Company plans to adopt this standard utilizing a modified retrospective transition method in the first quarter of 2018 and will be subject to expanded disclosure requirements upon adoption. The Company's implementation efforts include the identification of

revenue within the scope of the guidance, as well as the evaluation of revenue contracts. While the Company has not yet identified any material changes in the timing of revenue recognition, the Company's review is ongoing and continues to evaluate the presentation of certain contract costs (whether presented gross or offset against noninterest income).
Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Liabilities
In January 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-01, Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Liabilities. The amendments in this ASU revise an entity's accounting related to the classification and measurement of investments in equity securities and the presentation of certain fair value changes for financial liabilities measured at fair value. The ASU also amends certain disclosure requirements associated with the fair value of financial instruments. The amendments in this ASU are effective for annual periods, and interim periods within those annual periods, beginning after December 15, 2017. Early adoption is permitted for the presentation of certain fair value changes for financial liabilities measured at fair value. The adoption of this standard is not expected to have a material impact on the financial condition or results of operations of the Company.
Leases
In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842)which supersedes ASC Topic 840, Leases. The FASB issued this ASU to increase transparency and comparability among organizations by recognizing lease assets and lease liabilities on the balance sheet by lessees for those leases classified as operating leases under current U.S. GAAP and disclosing key information about leasing arrangements. The amendments in this ASU are effective for annual periods, and interim periods within those annual periods, beginning after December 15, 2018. Early application of this ASU is permitted for all entities. The Company is currently assessing the impact that the adoption of this standard will have on the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
Credit Losses
In June 2016,Subsequently, the FASB issued ASU 2016-13, Financial Instruments - Credit Losses,2018-01 in January 2018 which introducesprovides a practical expedient for land easements and issued ASU 2018-11 in July 2018 which includes an option to recognize a cumulative effect adjustment to retained earnings in the period of adoption instead of applying the guidance to prior comparative periods. This ASU, as amended, requires lessees to recognize right-of-use assets and associated liabilities that arise from leases, with the exception of short-term leases. Subsequent accounting for leases varies depending on whether the lease is classified as an operating lease or a finance lease. This ASU, as amended, does not make significant changes to lessor accounting. There are several new guidancequalitative and quantitative disclosures required. Upon transition, lessees and lessors have the option to recognize and measure leases at the beginning of the earliest period presented using a modified retrospective transition approach or to apply the modified retrospective approach with an additional, optional transition method that initially applies this ASU as of the adoption date and recognizes a cumulative effect adjustment to the opening balance of retained earnings in the period of adoption.
The Company adopted this ASU, as amended, on January 1, 2019 using the optional transition method, which allowed for a modified retrospective method of adoption with a cumulative effect adjustment to retained earnings without restating comparable periods. The Company also elected the transition relief package of practical expedients for which there is no requirement to reassess existence of leases, their classification, and initial direct costs as well as an exemption for short term leases with a term of less than one year. The Company did not elect the practical expedient to use hindsight in determining the lease term and in assessing impairment of right-of-use assets. 
At January 1, 2019, the Company recognized right-of-use assets of $290 million and lease liabilities of $332 million. The right-of-use assets and corresponding lease liabilities, recorded upon adoption, were primarily based on the present value of unpaid future minimum lease payments as of January 1, 2019. Those amounts were impacted by assumptions related to renewals and/or extensions of existing lease contracts and the interest rate used to discount those future lease

obligations. Additionally, the Company recognized a cumulative effect adjustment of approximately $3.5 million at adoption to increase the beginning balance of retained earnings as of January 1, 2019 for the accounting for credit lossesremaining deferred gains on instruments within its scope. The new guidance introduces an approach based on expected lossessale-leaseback transactions which occurred prior to estimate credit losses on certain types of financial instruments. It also modifies the impairment model for AFS debt securities and provides for a simplified accounting model for purchased financial assets with credit deterioration since their origination. The amendments in this ASU are effective for annual periods, and interim periods within those annual periods, beginning after December 15, 2019. Early application of this ASU is permitted. The Company is currently assessing the impact that the adoption of this standard will have on the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
Statement of Cash Flows
In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-15, Statement of Cash Flows - Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments, which provides guidance on eight specific cash flow issues with the objective of reducing the existing diversity in practice. The amendments in this ASU are effective for annual periods, and interim periods within those annual periods, beginning after December 15, 2017. Early application of this ASU is permitted. The Company is currently assessing the impact that the adoption of this standard will have on the Statements of Cash Flows of the Company.
In November 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-18, Statement of Cash Flows - Restricted Cash. The amendments in this ASU require that a statement of cash flows explain the change during the period in the total of cash, cash equivalents, and amounts generally described as restricted cash or restricted cash equivalents. The amendments in this ASU are effective for annual periods, and interim periods within those annual periods, beginning after December 15, 2017. Early application of this ASU is permitted. The Company is currently assessing the impact that the adoption of this standard will have on the Statement of Cash Flows of the Company.
Goodwill
In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-04, Intangibles -Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment, which simplifies the manner in which an entity is required to test goodwill for impairment by eliminating Step 2 from the goodwill impairment test.  Under the amendments in this ASU, an entity should (1) perform its annual or interim goodwill impairment test by comparing the fair value of a reporting unit with its carrying

amount, and (2) recognize an impairment charge for the amount by which the carrying amount exceeds the reporting unit’s fair value, with the understanding that the loss recognized should not exceed the total amount of goodwill allocated to that reporting unit.  Additionally, ASU No. 2017-04 removes the requirements for any reporting unit with a zero or negative carrying amount to perform a qualitative assessment and, if it fails such qualitative test, to perform Step 2 of the goodwill impairment test.adoption. This ASU is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019, and for interim periods within those fiscal years.  Early adoption is permitted, including adoption in an interim period.  The ASU should be applied using a prospective method.  The Company is currently assessing this pronouncement and the impact of adoption.
Retirement Benefits
In March 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-07, Compensation - Retirement Benefits (Topic 715): Improving the Presentation of Net Periodic Pension Cost and Net Periodic Postretirement Benefit Cost. The amendments in this ASU require that an employer disaggregate the service cost component from the other components of net benefit cost. The amendments also provide explicit guidance on how to present the service cost component and the other components of net benefit cost in the income statement and allow only the service cost component of net benefit cost to be eligible for capitalization. This ASU is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, and for interim periods within those fiscal years.  Early adoption is permitted.  The ASU should be applied retrospectively for the presentation of the service cost component and the other components of net benefit cost in the income statement and prospectively, on and after the effective date, for the capitalization of the service cost component of net benefit cost.  The adoption of this standard iswill not expected to have a material impact on the financial condition ortiming of expense recognition on the Company's results of operations ofoperations.
See Note 7, Leases, for the Company.required disclosures in accordance with this ASU.
Premium Amortization on Purchased Callable Debt Securities
In March 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-08, Receivables - Nonrefundable Fees and Other Costs (Subtopic 310-20), Premium Amortization on Purchased Callable Debt Securities. The amendments in this ASU reduce the amortization period for certain callable debt securities carried at a premium and require the premium to be amortized over a period not to exceed the earliest call date. These amendments do not apply to securities carried at a discount. ThisThe Company adopted this ASU is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, and for interim periods within those fiscal years.  Early adoption is permitted.  The ASU should be applied using a modified retrospective method.on January 1, 2019. The adoption of this standard is not expected to have a materialhad no impact on the financial condition or results of operations of the Company.
Derivatives and Hedging
In August 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-12, Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815), Targeted Improvements to Accounting for Hedging Activities. The amendments in this ASU better align an entity's risk management activities and financial reporting for hedging relationships through changes to both the designation and measurement guidance for qualifying hedging relationships and the presentation of hedge results.
In October 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-16, Inclusion of the SOFR OIS Rate as a Benchmark Interest Rate for Hedge Accounting Purposes. The amendments in this ASU permit the OIS rate based on SOFR as a US benchmark interest rate for hedge accounting purposes under Topic 815.
The Company adopted these ASUs on January 1, 2019. The adoption of these standards did not have a material impact on the financial condition or results of operations of the Company. The adoption resulted in an immaterial cumulative effect adjustment to the opening balance of retained earnings. For additional information on the Company’s derivative and hedging activities, see Note 5, Derivatives and Hedging.
Comprehensive Income
In February 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-02, Income Statement - Reporting Comprehensive Income, Reclassification of Certain Tax Effects from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income. The amendments in this ASU allow a reclassification from accumulated other comprehensive income to retained earnings for stranded tax effects resulting from the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act. The Company adopted this ASU on January 1, 2019 and reclassified approximately $35.4 million from accumulated other comprehensive income to retained earnings.
Recently Issued Accounting Standards Not Yet Adopted
Credit Losses
In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-13, Financial Instruments - Credit Losses, which introduces new guidance for the accounting for credit losses on instruments within its scope. The new guidance introduces an approach based on expected losses to estimate credit losses on certain types of financial instruments. It also modifies the impairment model for AFS debt securities and provides for a simplified accounting model for purchased financial assets with credit deterioration since their origination. The amendments in this ASU are effective for annual periods, and interim periods within those annual periods, beginning after December 15, 2019. Early application of this ASU is permitted. Adoption will be applied through a cumulative-effect adjustment to retained earnings as of the beginning of the first reporting period in which the ASU is effective. The Company intends to adopt this standard on January 1, 2020 and has formed a cross-functional team to oversee the implementation of the ASU. The Company is currently in the process of developing credit models as well as accounting, reporting and governance processes to comply with the new ASU.
Goodwill
In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-04, Intangibles -Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment, which simplifies the manner in which an entity is required to test goodwill for impairment

by eliminating Step 2 from the goodwill impairment test.  Under the amendments in this ASU, an entity should (1) perform its annual or interim goodwill impairment test by comparing the fair value of a reporting unit with its carrying amount, and (2) recognize an impairment charge for the amount by which the carrying amount exceeds the reporting unit’s fair value, with the understanding that the loss recognized should not exceed the total amount of goodwill allocated to that reporting unit.  Additionally, ASU No. 2017-04 removes the requirements for any reporting unit with a zero or negative carrying amount to perform a qualitative assessment and, if it fails such qualitative test, to perform Step 2 of the goodwill impairment test.  This ASU is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019, and for interim periods within those fiscal years.  Early adoption is permitted, including adoption in an interim period.  The ASU should be applied using a prospective method.  Based on the Company’s most recent qualitative goodwill impairment assessment performed as of October 31, 2018, there were no reporting units for which it was more-likely-than-not that the carrying amount of a reporting unit exceeded its respective fair value; therefore, this ASU would not currently have an impact on the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements or related disclosures. However, if upon adoption, which is expected to occur on January 1, 2020, the carrying amount of a reporting unit exceeds its respective fair value, the Company would be required to recognize an impairment charge for the amount that the carrying value exceeds the fair value.
Fair Value Measurements
In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-13, Disclosure Framework - Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Fair Value Measurements. The amendments in this ASU modify the disclosure requirements for fair value measurements in Topic 820, Fair Value Measurements. This ASU is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019, and for interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted. The Company is currently assessing this pronouncement and the impact that the adoption of adoption.this standard will have on its fair value disclosures.
Internal-Use Software
In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-15, Customer's Accounting for Implementation Costs Incurred in a Cloud Computing Arrangement That is a Service Contract. The amendments in this ASU align the requirements for capitalizing implementation costs incurred in a hosting arrangement that is a service contract with the requirements for capitalizing implementation costs incurred to develop or obtain internal-use software and hosting arrangements that include an internal-use software license. This ASU is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019, and for interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted. The Company is currently assessing the impact that the adoption of this standard will have on the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

(2) InvestmentDebt Securities Available for Sale and InvestmentDebt Securities Held to Maturity
The following tables present the adjusted cost and approximate fair value of investmentdebt securities available for sale and investmentdebt securities held to maturity.
 September 30, 2017
   Gross Unrealized  
 Amortized Cost Gains Losses Fair Value
 (In Thousands)
Investment securities available for sale:       
Debt securities:       
U.S. Treasury and other U.S. government agencies$3,704,848
 $5,243
 $30,401
 $3,679,690
Mortgage-backed securities3,051,728
 18,256
 31,667
 3,038,317
Collateralized mortgage obligations5,171,868
 4,663
 76,490
 5,100,041
States and political subdivisions2,276
 118
 
 2,394
Other17,739
 96
 87
 17,748
Equity securities430,032
 87
 
 430,119
Total$12,378,491
 $28,463
 $138,645
 $12,268,309
Investment securities held to maturity:       
Collateralized mortgage obligations$69,098
 $4,232
 $3,634
 $69,696
Asset-backed securities10,409
 2,011
 768
 11,652
States and political subdivisions936,353
 5,103
 15,054
 926,402
Other61,512
 306
 1,649
 60,169
Total$1,077,372
 $11,652
 $21,105
 $1,067,919
 March 31, 2019
   Gross Unrealized  
 Amortized Cost Gains Losses Fair Value
 (In Thousands)
Debt securities available for sale:       
U.S. Treasury and other U.S. government agencies$4,244,399
 $2,275
 $73,014
 $4,173,660
Agency mortgage-backed securities1,861,131
 9,337
 25,267
 1,845,201
Agency collateralized mortgage obligations3,326,835
 4,620
 54,180
 3,277,275
States and political subdivisions825
 57
 
 882
Total$9,433,190
 $16,289
 $152,461
 $9,297,018
Debt securities held to maturity:       
U.S. Treasury and other U.S. government agencies$1,283,487
 $21,683
 $32
 $1,305,138
Collateralized mortgage obligations:

 

 

 

Agency2,540,857
 47,716
 1,365
 2,587,208
Non-agency44,638
 6,623
 1,122
 50,139
Asset-backed securities and other60,909
 1,531
 696
 61,744
States and political subdivisions645,150
 11,724
 6,176
 650,698
Total$4,575,041
 $89,277
 $9,391
 $4,654,927
 December 31, 2016
   Gross Unrealized  
 Amortized Cost Gains Losses Fair Value
 (In Thousands)
Investment securities available for sale:       
Debt securities:       
U.S. Treasury and other U.S. government agencies$2,409,141
 $2,390
 $37,200
 $2,374,331
Mortgage-backed securities3,796,270
 12,869
 45,801
 3,763,338
Collateralized mortgage obligations5,200,241
 5,292
 106,605
 5,098,928
States and political subdivisions8,457
 184
 
 8,641
Other16,321
 6
 142
 16,185
Equity securities403,548
 84
 
 403,632
Total$11,833,978
 $20,825
 $189,748
 $11,665,055
Investment securities held to maturity:       
Collateralized mortgage obligations$83,087
 $5,265
 $3,278
 $85,074
Asset-backed securities15,118
 1,982
 1,081
 16,019
States and political subdivisions1,040,716
 2,309
 25,518
 1,017,507
Other64,296
 1,143
 2,030
 63,409
Total$1,203,217
 $10,699
 $31,907
 $1,182,009
In the above tables, equity securities include $430 million and $403 million at September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively, of FHLB and Federal Reserve stock carried at par.

 December 31, 2018
   Gross Unrealized  
 Amortized Cost Gains Losses Fair Value
 (In Thousands)
Debt securities available for sale:       
U.S. Treasury and other U.S. government agencies$5,525,902
 $13,000
 $107,435
 $5,431,467
Agency mortgage-backed securities2,156,872
 9,402
 36,453
 2,129,821
Agency collateralized mortgage obligations3,492,538
 4,021
 77,580
 3,418,979
States and political subdivisions886
 63
 
 949
Total$11,176,198
 $26,486
 $221,468
 $10,981,216
Debt securities held to maturity:       
Collateralized mortgage obligations:

 

 

 

Agency$2,089,860
 $26,988
 $10,338
 $2,106,510
Non-agency46,834
 7,198
 1,129
 52,903
Asset-backed securities and other61,304
 2,346
 471
 63,179
States and political subdivisions687,615
 18,545
 3,332
 702,828
Total$2,885,613
 $55,077
 $15,270
 $2,925,420
The investments held within the states and political subdivision caption of investmentdebt securities held to maturity relate to private placement transactions underwritten as loans by the Company but that meet the definition of a security within ASC Topic 320, Investments – Debt and Equity Securities.

The following tables disclose the fair value and the gross unrealized losses of the Company’s available for sale debt securities and held to maturity debt securities that were in a loss position at September 30, 2017March 31, 2019 and December 31, 20162018. This information is aggregated by investment category and the length of time the individual securities have been in an unrealized loss position.
 September 30, 2017
 Securities in a loss position for less than 12 months Securities in a loss position for 12 months or longer Total
 Fair Value Unrealized Losses Fair Value Unrealized Losses Fair Value Unrealized Losses
 (In Thousands)
Investment securities available for sale:           
Debt securities:           
U.S. Treasury and other U.S. government agencies$1,754,139
 $10,074
 $1,048,956
 $20,327
 $2,803,095
 $30,401
Mortgage-backed securities833,667
 7,391
 1,200,390
 24,276
 2,034,057
 31,667
Collateralized mortgage obligations1,364,631
 7,317
 3,068,922
 69,173
 4,433,553
 76,490
Other3,897
 29
 1,064
 58
 4,961
 87
Total$3,956,334
 $24,811
 $5,319,332
 $113,834
 $9,275,666
 $138,645
            
Investment securities held to maturity:           
Collateralized mortgage obligations$11,479
 $860
 $36,588
 $2,774
 $48,067
 $3,634
Asset-backed securities
 
 6,767
 768
 6,767
 768
States and political subdivisions427,317
 10,710
 156,604
 4,344
 583,921
 15,054
Other14,847
 61
 21,089
 1,588
 35,936
 1,649
Total$453,643
 $11,631
 $221,048
 $9,474
 $674,691
 $21,105
 March 31, 2019
 Securities in a loss position for less than 12 months Securities in a loss position for 12 months or longer Total
 Fair Value Unrealized Losses Fair Value Unrealized Losses Fair Value Unrealized Losses
 (In Thousands)
Debt securities available for sale:           
U.S. Treasury and other U.S. government agencies$268,242
 $16
 $3,593,781
 $72,998
 $3,862,023
 $73,014
Agency mortgage-backed securities22,193
 97
 1,345,329
 25,170
 1,367,522
 25,267
Agency collateralized mortgage obligations79,695
 267
 2,569,948
 53,913
 2,649,643
 54,180
Total$370,130
 $380
 $7,509,058
 $152,081
 $7,879,188
 $152,461
            
Debt securities held to maturity:           
U.S. Treasury and other U.S. government agencies$12,093
 $32
 $
 $
 $12,093
 $32
Collateralized mortgage obligations:

 

 

 

 

 

Agency
 
 318,079
 1,365
 318,079
 1,365
Non-agency3,532
 36
 12,582
 1,086
 16,114
 1,122
Asset-backed securities and other24,786
 287
 5,451
 409
 30,237
 696
States and political subdivisions189,781
 6,176
 
 
 189,781
 6,176
Total$230,192
 $6,531
 $336,112
 $2,860
 $566,304
 $9,391
 December 31, 2016
 Securities in a loss position for less than 12 months Securities in a loss position for 12 months or longer Total
 Fair Value Unrealized Losses Fair Value Unrealized Losses Fair Value Unrealized Losses
 (In Thousands)
Investment securities available for sale:           
Debt securities:           
U.S. Treasury and other U.S. government agencies$1,277,341
 $23,862
 $609,078
 $13,338
 $1,886,419
 $37,200
Mortgage-backed securities1,425,743
 15,235
 1,368,957
 30,566
 2,794,700
 45,801
Collateralized mortgage obligations3,527,757
 99,477
 782,849
 7,128
 4,310,606
 106,605
Other3,849
 77
 1,057
 65
 4,906
 142
Total$6,234,690
 $138,651
 $2,761,941
 $51,097
 $8,996,631
 $189,748
            
Investment securities held to maturity:           
Collateralized mortgage obligations$3,847
 $527
 $40,083
 $2,751
 $43,930
 $3,278
Asset-backed securities343
 1
 9,238
 1,080
 9,581
 1,081
States and political subdivisions532,090
 13,043
 313,803
 12,475
 845,893
 25,518
Other16,578
 174
 3,587
 1,856
 20,165
 2,030
Total$552,858
 $13,745
 $366,711
 $18,162
 $919,569
 $31,907
 December 31, 2018
 Securities in a loss position for less than 12 months Securities in a loss position for 12 months or longer Total
 Fair Value Unrealized Losses Fair Value Unrealized Losses Fair Value Unrealized Losses
 (In Thousands)
Debt securities available for sale:           
U.S. Treasury and other U.S. government agencies$338
 $1
 $3,879,564
 $107,434
 $3,879,902
 $107,435
Agency mortgage-backed securities68,404
 279
 1,533,156
 36,174
 1,601,560
 36,453
Agency collateralized mortgage obligations116,052
 132
 2,710,008
 77,448
 2,826,060
 77,580
Total$184,794
 $412
 $8,122,728
 $221,056
 $8,307,522
 $221,468
            
Debt securities held to maturity:           
Collateralized mortgage obligations:

 

 

 

 

 

Agency$
 $
 $845,512
 $10,338
 $845,512
 $10,338
Non-agency3,715
 71
 13,195
 1,058
 16,910
 1,129
Asset-backed securities and other6,911
 87
 5,994
 384
 12,905
 471
States and political subdivisions116,925
 2,148
 118,834
 1,184
 235,759
 3,332
Total$127,551
 $2,306
 $983,535
 $12,964
 $1,111,086
 $15,270

As indicated in the previous tables, at September 30, 2017,March 31, 2019, the Company held certain investmentdebt securities in unrealized loss positions. The Company does not intend to sell these securities nor is it more-likely-than-not-that it will be required to sell these securities before their anticipated recovery.
The Company regularly evaluates each available for sale and held to maturity debt security in a loss position for OTTI. In its evaluation, the Company considers such factors as the length of time and the extent to which the fair value has been below cost, the financial condition of the issuer, the Company’s intent to hold the security to an expected recovery in market value and whether it is more likely than not thatmore-likely-than-not-that the Company will have to sell the security before its fair value recovers. Activity related to the credit loss component of the OTTI is recognized in earnings. The portion of OTTI related to all other factors is recognized in other comprehensive income.
Management does not believe that any individual unrealized loss in the Company’s investmentdebt securities available for sale or held to maturity portfolios, presented in the preceding tables, represents an OTTI at either September 30, 2017March 31, 2019 or December 31, 20162018, other than those noted below.
The following table discloses activity related to credit losses for debt securities where a portion of the OTTI was recognized in other comprehensive income.
Three Months Ended 
 September 30,
 Nine Months Ended 
 September 30,
Three Months Ended 
 March 31,
2017
2016 2017 20162019
2018
(In Thousands)(In Thousands)
Balance at beginning of period$22,824
 $22,582
 $22,582
 $22,452
$23,416
 $22,824
Reductions for securities paid off during the period (realized)
 
 
 

 
Additions for the credit component on debt securities in which OTTI was not previously recognized
 
 242
 

 
Additions for the credit component on debt securities in which OTTI was previously recognized
 
 
 130

 309
Balance at end of period$22,824
 $22,582
 $22,824
 $22,582
$23,416
 $23,133
For both the three months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016,March 31, 2019, there was no OTTI recognized on held to maturity securities. For the ninethree months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016,March 31, 2018, there was $242$309 thousand and $130 thousand, respectively, of OTTI recognized on held to maturity securities. The investmentdebt securities primarily impacted by credit impairment are held to maturity non-agency collateralized mortgage obligations.

The contractual maturities of the securities portfolios are presented in the following table.
September 30, 2017 Amortized Cost Fair Value
March 31, 2019 Amortized Cost Fair Value
 (In Thousands) (In Thousands)
Investment securities available for sale:  
Debt securities available for sale:  
Maturing within one year $150,384
 $150,356
 $249,983
 $249,983
Maturing after one but within five years 1,283,937
 1,279,279
 2,988,014
 2,958,666
Maturing after five but within ten years 1,347,306
 1,342,532
 399,577
 398,756
Maturing after ten years 943,236
 927,665
 607,650
 567,137
 3,724,863
 3,699,832
 4,245,224
 4,174,542
Mortgage-backed securities and collateralized mortgage obligations 8,223,596
 8,138,358
 5,187,966
 5,122,476
Equity securities 430,032
 430,119
Total $12,378,491
 $12,268,309
 $9,433,190
 $9,297,018
        
Investment securities held to maturity:    
Debt securities held to maturity:    
Maturing within one year $101,445
 $101,473
 $50
 $50
Maturing after one but within five years 192,870
 192,122
 153,512
 155,058
Maturing after five but within ten years 225,282
 222,099
 1,568,864
 1,592,552
Maturing after ten years 488,677
 482,529
 267,120
 269,920
 1,008,274
 998,223
 1,989,546
 2,017,580
Collateralized mortgage obligations 69,098
 69,696
 2,585,495
 2,637,347
Total $1,077,372
 $1,067,919
 $4,575,041
 $4,654,927
The gross realized gains and losses recognized on sales of investmentdebt securities available for sale are shown in the table below.
Three Months Ended September 30, Nine Months Ended September 30,Three Months Ended March 31,
2017 2016 2017 20162019 2018
(In Thousands)(In Thousands)
Gross gains$3,033
 $
 $3,033
 $30,037
$8,958
 $
Gross losses
 
 
 

 
Net realized gains$3,033
 $
 $3,033
 $30,037
$8,958
 $

(3) Loans and Allowance for Loan Losses
The following table presents the composition of the loan portfolio.
September 30, 2017 December 31, 2016March 31, 2019 December 31, 2018
(In Thousands)(In Thousands)
Commercial loans:      
Commercial, financial and agricultural$25,091,942
 $25,122,002
$25,281,930
 $26,562,319
Real estate – construction2,247,144
 2,125,316
1,945,347
 1,997,537
Commercial real estate – mortgage11,342,378
 11,210,660
12,955,196
 13,016,796
Total commercial loans38,681,464
 38,457,978
40,182,473
 41,576,652
Consumer loans:      
Residential real estate – mortgage13,398,503
 13,259,994
13,396,396
 13,422,156
Equity lines of credit2,617,312
 2,543,778
2,716,307
 2,747,217
Equity loans383,376
 445,709
288,169
 298,614
Credit card590,975
 604,881
832,832
 818,308
Consumer direct1,604,396
 1,254,641
2,533,916
 2,553,588
Consumer indirect3,039,178
 3,134,948
3,807,452
 3,770,019
Total consumer loans21,633,740
 21,243,951
23,575,072
 23,609,902
Covered loans (1)
 359,334
Total loans$60,315,204
 $60,061,263
$63,757,545
 $65,186,554
(1)Covered loans represent loans acquired from the FDIC subject to loss sharing agreements. The loss sharing agreements provide for FDIC loss sharing for five years for commercial loans and 10 years for single family residential loans. The loss sharing agreement for commercial loans expired in the fourth quarter of 2014. In July 2017, the Company entered into an agreement with the FDIC to terminate the Company's single family residential loss share agreement ahead of the contractual maturity. Loans no longer covered under a loss share agreement were reclassified to their appropriate loan type.




Allowance for Loan Losses and Credit Quality
The following table, which excludes loans held for sale, presents a summary of the activity in the allowance for loan losses. The portion of the allowance that has not been identified by the Company as related to specific loan categories has been allocated to the individual loan categories on a pro rata basis for purposes of the table below:
Commercial, Financial and Agricultural Commercial Real Estate (1) Residential Real Estate (2) Consumer (3) Covered TotalCommercial, Financial and Agricultural Commercial Real Estate (1) Residential Real Estate (2) Consumer (3) Total
(In Thousands)(In Thousands)
Three months ended September 30, 2017          
Three months ended March 31, 2019Three months ended March 31, 2019        
Allowance for loan losses:                    
Beginning balance$427,654
 $116,819
 $108,095
 $164,384
 $
 $816,952
$393,315
 $112,437
 $101,929
 $277,561
 $885,242
Provision for loan losses20,513
 10,633
 8,411
 63,877
 
 103,434
59,180
 4,662
 2,183
 116,267
 182,292
Loan charge-offs(21,320) (7,913) (4,290) (55,102) 
 (88,625)
Loans charged-off(9,503) (25) (5,012) (112,873) (127,413)
Loan recoveries6,625
 235
 2,401
 8,097
 
 17,358
4,760
 1,462
 3,589
 16,090
 25,901
Net (charge-offs) recoveries(14,695) (7,678) (1,889) (47,005) 
 (71,267)(4,743) 1,437
 (1,423) (96,783) (101,512)
Ending balance$433,472
 $119,774
 $114,617
 $181,256
 $
 $849,119
$447,752
 $118,536
 $102,689
 $297,045
 $966,022
Three months ended September 30, 2016          
Allowance for loan losses:           
Beginning balance$499,398
 $114,311
 $119,076
 $110,266
 $
 $843,051
Provision for loan losses20,533
 54
 528
 43,992
 
 65,107
Loan charge-offs(13,702) (104) (4,608) (46,472) 
 (64,886)
Loan recoveries4,766
 682
 3,429
 9,931
 
 18,808
Net (charge-offs) recoveries(8,936) 578
 (1,179) (36,541) 
 (46,078)
Ending balance$510,995
 $114,943
 $118,425
 $117,717
 $
 $862,080
           
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2017          
Three months ended March 31, 2018Three months ended March 31, 2018        
Allowance for loan losses:                    
Beginning balance$458,580
 $116,937
 $119,484
 $143,292
 $
 $838,293
$420,635
 $118,133
 $109,856
 $194,136
 $842,760
Provision (credit) for loan losses49,045
 7,534
 2,639
 169,671
 (31) 228,858
(14,097) 3,667
 (2,531) 69,990
 57,029
Loan charge-offs(91,943) (8,927) (16,242) (160,261) 
 (277,373)
Loans charged-off(10,132) (203) (4,582) (68,384) (83,301)
Loan recoveries17,790
 4,230
 8,736
 28,554
 31
 59,341
1,737
 178
 3,111
 10,557
 15,583
Net (charge-offs) recoveries(74,153) (4,697) (7,506) (131,707) 31
 (218,032)
Net charge-offs(8,395) (25) (1,471) (57,827) (67,718)
Ending balance$433,472
 $119,774
 $114,617
 $181,256
 $
 $849,119
$398,143
 $121,775
 $105,854
 $206,299
 $832,071
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2016          
Allowance for loan losses:           
Beginning balance$402,113
 $122,068
 $132,104
 $104,948
 $1,440
 $762,673
Provision (credit) for loan losses167,648
 (7,393) (7,412) 112,058
 124
 265,025
Loan charge-offs(66,541) (3,555) (15,072) (125,607) (1,565) (212,340)
Loan recoveries7,775
 3,823
 8,805
 26,318
 1
 46,722
Net (charge-offs) recoveries(58,766) 268
 (6,267) (99,289) (1,564) (165,618)
Ending balance$510,995
 $114,943
 $118,425
 $117,717
 $
 $862,080
(1)
Includes commercial real estate – mortgage and real estate – construction loans.
(2)
Includes residential real estate – mortgage, equity lines of credit and equity loans.
(3)
Includes credit card, consumer direct and consumer indirect loans.

The table below provides a summary of the allowance for loan losses and related loan balances by portfolio.
Commercial, Financial and Agricultural Commercial Real Estate (1) Residential Real Estate (2) Consumer (3) Covered TotalCommercial, Financial and Agricultural Commercial Real Estate (1) Residential Real Estate (2) Consumer (3) Total
(In Thousands)(In Thousands)
September 30, 2017           
March 31, 2019         
Ending balance of allowance attributable to loans:Ending balance of allowance attributable to loans:          Ending balance of allowance attributable to loans:        
Individually evaluated for impairment$67,280
 $9,723
 $28,989
 $2,260
 $
 $108,252
$117,349
 $6,351
 $25,402
 $2,598
 $151,700
Collectively evaluated for impairment366,192
 110,051
 85,628
 178,996
 
 740,867
330,403
 112,185
 77,287
 294,447
 814,322
Total allowance for loan losses$433,472
 $119,774
 $114,617
 $181,256
 $
 $849,119
$447,752
 $118,536
 $102,689
 $297,045
 $966,022
Ending balance of loans:Ending balance of loans:          Ending balance of loans:        
Individually evaluated for impairment$302,285
 $82,905
 $170,608
 $3,862
 $
 $559,660
$445,037
 $80,097
 $152,377
 $5,039
 $682,550
Collectively evaluated for impairment24,789,657
 13,506,617
 16,228,583
 5,230,687
 
 59,755,544
24,836,893
 14,820,446
 16,248,495
 7,169,161
 63,074,995
Total loans$25,091,942
 $13,589,522
 $16,399,191
 $5,234,549
 $
 $60,315,204
$25,281,930
 $14,900,543
 $16,400,872
 $7,174,200
 $63,757,545
                    
December 31, 2016           
December 31, 2018         
Ending balance of allowance attributable to loans:Ending balance of allowance attributable to loans:          Ending balance of allowance attributable to loans:        
Individually evaluated for impairment$99,932
 $4,037
 $32,016
 $2,223
 $
 $138,208
$73,072
 $6,283
 $26,008
 $1,880
 $107,243
Collectively evaluated for impairment358,648
 112,900
 87,468
 141,069
 
 700,085
320,243
 106,154
 75,921
 275,681
 777,999
Total allowance for loan losses$458,580
 $116,937
 $119,484
 $143,292
 $
 $838,293
$393,315
 $112,437
 $101,929
 $277,561
 $885,242
Ending balance of loans:Ending balance of loans:          Ending balance of loans:        
Individually evaluated for impairment$719,468
 $44,258
 $186,338
 $3,042
 $
 $953,106
$386,282
 $85,250
 $153,342
 $5,135
 $630,009
Collectively evaluated for impairment24,402,534
 13,291,718
 16,063,143
 4,991,428
 359,334
 59,108,157
26,176,037
 14,929,083
 16,314,645
 7,136,780
 64,556,545
Total loans$25,122,002
 $13,335,976
 $16,249,481
 $4,994,470
 $359,334
 $60,061,263
$26,562,319
 $15,014,333
 $16,467,987
 $7,141,915
 $65,186,554
(1)
Includes commercial real estate – mortgage and real estate – construction loans.
(2)
Includes residential real estate – mortgage, equity lines of credit and equity loans.
(3)
Includes credit card, consumer direct and consumer indirect loans.

The following tables present information on individually evaluated impaired loans, by loan class.
September 30, 2017March 31, 2019
Individually Evaluated Impaired Loans With No Recorded Allowance Individually Evaluated Impaired Loans With a Recorded AllowanceIndividually Evaluated Impaired Loans With No Recorded Allowance Individually Evaluated Impaired Loans With a Recorded Allowance
Recorded Investment Unpaid Principal Balance Allowance Recorded Investment Unpaid Principal Balance AllowanceRecorded Investment Unpaid Principal Balance Allowance Recorded Investment Unpaid Principal Balance Allowance
(In Thousands)(In Thousands)
Commercial, financial and agricultural$124,830
 $134,543
 $
 $177,455
 $218,610
 $67,280
$155,057
 $162,849
 $
 $289,980
 $347,690
 $117,349
Real estate – construction4,593
 4,593
 
 215
 262
 196

 
 
 132
 132
 6
Commercial real estate – mortgage33,979
 35,189
 
 44,118
 51,622
 9,527
48,895
 52,480
 
 31,070
 35,789
 6,345
Residential real estate – mortgage
 
 
 113,464
 113,464
 9,743

 
 
 106,012
 106,012
 8,686
Equity lines of credit
 
 
 20,385
 20,389
 14,919

 
 
 15,005
 15,009
 12,821
Equity loans
 
 
 36,759
 37,451
 4,327

 
 
 31,360
 32,240
 3,895
Credit card
 
 
 
 
 

 
 
 
 
 
Consumer direct
 
 
 2,591
 2,591
 1,074

 
 
 4,702
 4,702
 2,265
Consumer indirect
 
 
 1,271
 1,271
 1,186

 
 
 337
 337
 333
Total loans$163,402
 $174,325
 $
 $396,258
 $445,660
 $108,252
$203,952
 $215,329
 $
 $478,598
 $541,911
 $151,700

December 31, 2016December 31, 2018
Individually Evaluated Impaired Loans With No Recorded Allowance Individually Evaluated Impaired Loans With a Recorded AllowanceIndividually Evaluated Impaired Loans With No Recorded Allowance Individually Evaluated Impaired Loans With a Recorded Allowance
Recorded Investment Unpaid Principal Balance Allowance Recorded Investment Unpaid Principal Balance AllowanceRecorded Investment Unpaid Principal Balance Allowance Recorded Investment Unpaid Principal Balance Allowance
(In Thousands)(In Thousands)
Commercial, financial and agricultural$375,957
 $396,294
 $
 $343,511
 $371,085
 $99,932
$162,011
 $196,316
 $
 $224,271
 $262,947
 $73,072
Real estate – construction
 
 
 344
 459
 344

 
 
 138
 138
 6
Commercial real estate – mortgage19,235
 20,177
 
 24,679
 24,865
 3,693
45,628
 48,404
 
 39,484
 44,463
 6,277
Residential real estate – mortgage
 
 
 119,986
 119,986
 7,529

 
 
 104,787
 104,787
 8,711
Equity lines of credit
 
 
 24,591
 25,045
 19,083

 
 
 16,012
 16,016
 13,334
Equity loans
 
 
 41,761
 42,561
 5,404

 
 
 32,543
 33,258
 3,963
Credit card
 
 
 
 
 

 
 
 
 
 
Consumer direct
 
 
 745
 745
 59

 
 
 4,715
 4,715
 1,473
Consumer indirect
 
 
 2,297
 2,297
 2,164

 
 
 420
 420
 407
Total loans$395,192
 $416,471
 $
 $557,914
 $587,043
 $138,208
$207,639
 $244,720
 $
 $422,370
 $466,744
 $107,243
The following tables presenttable presents information on individually evaluated impaired loans, by loan class.
 Three Months Ended September 30, 2017 Three Months Ended September 30, 2016
 Average Recorded Investment Interest Income Recognized Average Recorded Investment Interest Income Recognized
 (In Thousands)
Commercial, financial and agricultural$348,075
 $191
 $769,719
 $401
Real estate – construction4,230
 2
 634
 2
Commercial real estate – mortgage83,568
 232
 36,874
 255
Residential real estate – mortgage115,267
 671
 110,262
 666
Equity lines of credit20,845
 219
 26,231
 246
Equity loans37,085
 323
 43,292
 375
Credit card
 
 
 
Consumer direct2,599
 11
 803
 7
Consumer indirect1,355
 2
 2,505
 3
Total loans$613,024
 $1,651
 $990,320
 $1,955
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2017 Nine Months Ended September 30, 2016Three Months Ended March 31, 2019 Three Months Ended March 31, 2018
Average Recorded Investment Interest Income Recognized Average Recorded Investment Interest Income RecognizedAverage Recorded Investment Interest Income Recognized Average Recorded Investment Interest Income Recognized
(In Thousands)(In Thousands)
Commercial, financial and agricultural$472,639
 $743
 $575,038
 $1,033
$413,888
 $963
 $256,249
 $136
Real estate – construction1,811
 6
 2,118
 6
134
 2
 5,978
 2
Commercial real estate – mortgage69,304
 852
 46,073
 932
82,864
 215
 83,733
 211
Residential real estate – mortgage115,622
 1,986
 109,020
 1,953
106,397
 649
 111,057
 680
Equity lines of credit22,151
 671
 27,170
 790
15,257
 174
 18,756
 194
Equity loans38,711
 997
 44,629
 1,123
31,718
 276
 35,701
 303
Credit card
 
 
 

 
 
 
Consumer direct1,320
 22
 854
 22
5,559
 68
 3,851
 11
Consumer indirect1,706
 8
 2,152
 9
364
 
 897
 2
Total loans$723,264
 $5,285
 $807,054
 $5,868
$656,181
 $2,347
 $516,222
 $1,539
Detailed information on the Company's allowance for loan losses methodology and the Company's impaired loan policy are included in the Notes to the Company's Consolidated Financial Statements in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016.2018.
The Company monitors the credit quality of its commercial portfolio using an internal dual risk rating, which considers both the obligor and the facility. The obligor risk ratings are defined by ranges of default probabilities of the borrowers, through internally assigned letter grades (AAA through D2) and the facility risk ratings are defined by ranges of the loss given default. The combination of those two approaches results in the assessment of the likelihood of loss and it is mapped to the regulatory classifications. The Company assigns internal risk ratings at loan origination and at regular intervals subsequent to origination. Loan review intervals are dependent on the size and risk grade of the loan, and are generally conducted at least annually. Additional reviews are conducted when information affecting the loan’s risk grade becomes available. The general characteristics of the risk grades are as follows:
The Company’s internally assigned letter grades “AAA” through “B-” correspond to the regulatory classification “Pass.” These loans do not have any identified potential or well-defined weaknesses and have a high likelihood of orderly repayment. Exceptions exist when either the facility is fully secured by a CD and held at the Company or the facility is secured by properly margined and controlled marketable securities.
Internally assigned letter grades “CCC+” through “CCC” correspond to the regulatory classification “Special Mention.” Loans within this classification have potential weaknesses that deserve management’s close

attention. If left uncorrected, these potential weaknesses may result in deterioration of the repayment prospects for the loan or in the institution’s credit position at some future date. Special mention loans are not adversely classified and do not expose an institution to sufficient risk to warrant adverse classification.

Internally assigned letter grades “CCC-” through “D1” correspond to the regulatory classification “Substandard.” A loan classified as substandard is inadequately protected by the current sound worth and paying capacity of the obligor or of the collateral pledged, if any. Substandard loans have a well-defined weakness or weaknesses that jeopardize the liquidation of the loan. They are characterized by the distinct possibility that the Company will sustain some loss if the deficiencies are not corrected.
The internally assigned letter grade “D2” corresponds to the regulatory classification “Doubtful.” Loans classified as doubtful have all the weaknesses inherent in a loan classified as substandard with the added characteristic that the weaknesses make collection or liquidation in full, on the basis of currently existing facts, conditions, and values, highly questionable or improbable.
The Company considers payment history as the best indicator of credit quality for the consumer portfolio. Nonperforming loans in the tables below include loans classified as nonaccrual, loans 90 days or more past due and loans modified in a TDR 90 days or more past due.
The following tables, which exclude loans held for sale, and covered loans, illustrate the credit quality indicators associated with the Company’s loans, by loan class.
CommercialCommercial
September 30, 2017March 31, 2019
Commercial, Financial and Agricultural Real Estate - Construction Commercial Real Estate - MortgageCommercial, Financial and Agricultural Real Estate - Construction Commercial Real Estate - Mortgage
(In Thousands)(In Thousands)
Pass$23,705,231
 $2,208,525
 $11,054,754
$23,933,079
 $1,916,571
 $12,683,872
Special Mention514,233
 35,017
 111,720
515,971
 13,051
 148,168
Substandard746,719
 3,602
 158,623
655,923
 15,725
 113,836
Doubtful125,759
 
 17,281
176,957
 
 9,320
$25,091,942
 $2,247,144
 $11,342,378
$25,281,930
 $1,945,347
 $12,955,196
December 31, 2016December 31, 2018
Commercial, Financial and Agricultural Real Estate - Construction Commercial Real Estate - MortgageCommercial, Financial and Agricultural Real Estate - Construction Commercial Real Estate - Mortgage
(In Thousands)(In Thousands)
Pass$23,142,975
 $2,055,483
 $10,898,877
$25,395,640
 $1,971,852
 $12,620,421
Special Mention758,417
 60,826
 187,182
412,129
 12,372
 215,322
Substandard1,081,439
 9,007
 106,183
631,706
 13,313
 170,303
Doubtful139,171
 
 18,418
122,844
 
 10,750
$25,122,002
 $2,125,316
 $11,210,660
$26,562,319
 $1,997,537
 $13,016,796

ConsumerConsumer
September 30, 2017March 31, 2019
Residential Real Estate – Mortgage Equity Lines of Credit Equity Loans Credit Card Consumer Direct Consumer IndirectResidential Real Estate – Mortgage Equity Lines of Credit Equity Loans Credit Card Consumer Direct Consumer Indirect
(In Thousands)(In Thousands)
Performing$13,219,631
 $2,580,717
 $371,092
 $580,283
 $1,596,441
 $3,021,453
$13,223,614
 $2,679,837
 $278,237
 $814,333
 $2,511,940
 $3,777,828
Nonperforming178,872
 36,595
 12,284
 10,692
 7,955
 17,725
172,782
 36,470
 9,932
 18,499
 21,976
 29,624
$13,398,503
 $2,617,312
 $383,376
 $590,975
 $1,604,396
 $3,039,178
$13,396,396
 $2,716,307
 $288,169
 $832,832
 $2,533,916
 $3,807,452
December 31, 2016December 31, 2018
Residential Real Estate -Mortgage Equity Lines of Credit Equity Loans Credit Card Consumer Direct Consumer IndirectResidential Real Estate -Mortgage Equity Lines of Credit Equity Loans Credit Card Consumer Direct Consumer Indirect
(In Thousands)(In Thousands)
Performing$13,115,936
 $2,507,375
 $431,417
 $593,927
 $1,249,370
 $3,121,825
$13,248,822
 $2,707,289
 $287,392
 $801,297
 $2,535,724
 $3,742,394
Nonperforming144,058
 36,403
 14,292
 10,954
 5,271
 13,123
173,334
 39,928
 11,222
 17,011
 17,864
 27,625
$13,259,994
 $2,543,778
 $445,709
 $604,881
 $1,254,641
 $3,134,948
$13,422,156
 $2,747,217
 $298,614
 $818,308
 $2,553,588
 $3,770,019


The following tables present an aging analysis of the Company’s past due loans, excluding loans classified as held for sale.
September 30, 2017March 31, 2019
30-59 Days Past Due 60-89 Days Past Due 90 Days or More Past Due Nonaccrual Accruing TDRs Total Past Due and Impaired Not Past Due or Impaired Total30-59 Days Past Due 60-89 Days Past Due 90 Days or More Past Due Nonaccrual Accruing TDRs Total Past Due and Impaired Not Past Due or Impaired Total
(In Thousands)(In Thousands)
Commercial, financial and agricultural$51,581
 $6,351
 $6,072
 $324,071
 $1,259
 $389,334
 $24,702,608
 $25,091,942
$54,216
 $17,813
 $8,144
 $461,029
 $18,910
 $560,112
 $24,721,818
 $25,281,930
Real estate – construction661
 94
 2,955
 1,877
 106
 5,693
 2,241,451
 2,247,144
13,582
 1,707
 533
 1,298
 111
 17,231
 1,928,116
 1,945,347
Commercial real estate – mortgage21,324
 1,089
 3,686
 108,040
 4,645
 138,784
 11,203,594
 11,342,378
4,679
 322
 1,160
 109,447
 3,811
 119,419
 12,835,777
 12,955,196
Residential real estate – mortgage57,582
 32,606
 2,558
 175,490
 59,086
 327,322
 13,071,181
 13,398,503
78,538
 22,384
 9,007
 163,463
 59,167
 332,559
 13,063,837
 13,396,396
Equity lines of credit11,118
 4,824
 2,179
 34,416
 237
 52,774
 2,564,538
 2,617,312
15,355
 4,035
 1,471
 34,999
 
 55,860
 2,660,447
 2,716,307
Equity loans3,470
 1,798
 840
 11,305
 30,574
 47,987
 335,389
 383,376
2,920
 1,050
 34
 9,840
 26,188
 40,032
 248,137
 288,169
Credit card6,832
 4,777
 10,692
 
 
 22,301
 568,674
 590,975
9,394
 7,465
 18,499
 
 
 35,358
 797,474
 832,832
Consumer direct17,563
 6,796
 5,209
 2,746
 577
 32,891
 1,571,505
 1,604,396
35,620
 20,432
 17,251
 4,725
 3,854
 81,882
 2,452,034
 2,533,916
Consumer indirect81,534
 23,070
 8,858
 8,867
 
 122,329
 2,916,849
 3,039,178
78,610
 24,600
 7,781
 21,843
 
 132,834
 3,674,618
 3,807,452
Total loans$251,665
 $81,405
 $43,049
 $666,812
 $96,484
 $1,139,415
 $59,175,789
 $60,315,204
$292,914
 $99,808
 $63,880
 $806,644
 $112,041
 $1,375,287
 $62,382,258
 $63,757,545
December 31, 2016December 31, 2018
30-59 Days Past Due 60-89 Days Past Due 90 Days or More Past Due Nonaccrual Accruing TDRs  Total Past Due and Impaired Not Past Due or Impaired Total30-59 Days Past Due 60-89 Days Past Due 90 Days or More Past Due Nonaccrual Accruing TDRs Total Past Due and Impaired Not Past Due or Impaired Total
(In Thousands)(In Thousands)
Commercial, financial and agricultural$23,788
 $6,581
 $2,891
 $596,454
 $8,726
 $638,440
 $24,483,562
 $25,122,002
$17,257
 $11,784
 $8,114
 $400,389
 $18,926
 $456,470
 $26,105,849
 $26,562,319
Real estate – construction918
 50
 2,007
 1,239
 2,393
 6,607
 2,118,709
 2,125,316
218
 8,849
 544
 2,851
 116
 12,578
 1,984,959
 1,997,537
Commercial real estate – mortgage3,791
 3,474
 
 71,921
 4,860
 84,046
 11,126,614
 11,210,660
11,678
 3,375
 2,420
 110,144
 3,661
 131,278
 12,885,518
 13,016,796
Residential real estate – mortgage57,359
 28,450
 3,356
 140,303
 59,893
 289,361
 12,970,633
 13,259,994
80,366
 29,852
 5,927
 167,099
 57,446
 340,690
 13,081,466
 13,422,156
Equity lines of credit7,922
 4,583
 2,950
 33,453
 
 48,908
 2,494,870
 2,543,778
14,007
 5,109
 2,226
 37,702
 
 59,044
 2,688,173
 2,747,217
Equity loans5,615
 1,843
 467
 13,635
 34,746
 56,306
 389,403
 445,709
3,471
 843
 180
 10,939
 26,768
 42,201
 256,413
 298,614
Credit card6,411
 5,042
 10,954
 
 
 22,407
 582,474
 604,881
9,516
 7,323
 17,011
 
 
 33,850
 784,458
 818,308
Consumer direct13,338
 4,563
 4,482
 789
 704
 23,876
 1,230,765
 1,254,641
37,336
 19,543
 13,336
 4,528
 2,684
 77,427
 2,476,161
 2,553,588
Consumer indirect85,198
 22,833
 7,197
 5,926
 
 121,154
 3,013,794
 3,134,948
100,434
 32,172
 9,791
 17,834
 
 160,231
 3,609,788
 3,770,019
Covered loans7,311
 1,351
 27,238
 730
 
 36,630
 322,704
 359,334
Total loans$211,651
 $78,770
 $61,542
 $864,450
 $111,322
 $1,327,735
 $58,733,528
 $60,061,263
$274,283
 $118,850
 $59,549
 $751,486
 $109,601
 $1,313,769
 $63,872,785
 $65,186,554
Policies related to the Company's nonaccrual and past due loans are included in the Company's Consolidated Financial Statements in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016.2018.
It is the Company’s policy to classify TDRs that are not accruing interest as nonaccrual loans. It is also the Company’s policy to classify TDR past due loans that are accruing interest as TDRs and not according to their past due status. The tables above reflect this policy.
Modifications to borrowers' loan agreements are considered TDRs if a concession is granted for economic or legal reasons related to a borrower’s financial difficulties that otherwise would not be considered. Within each of the Company’s loan classes, TDRs typically involve modification of the loan interest rate to a below market rate or an extension or deferment of the loan. During the three months ended September 30, 2017, $3.3 million of TDR

modifications included an interest rate concession and $102.3 million of TDR modifications resulted from modifications to the loan’s structure. During the three months ended September 30, 2016, $1.2March 31, 2019, $4.7 million of TDR modifications included an interest rate concession and $36.5$15.8 million of TDR modifications resulted from modifications to the loan’s

structure. During the three months ended March 31, 2018, $3.3 million of TDR modifications included an interest rate concession and $4.0 million of TDR modifications resulted from modifications to the loan’s structure. During the nine months ended September 30, 2017, $5.2 million of TDR modifications included an interest rate concession and $212.5 million of TDR modifications resulted from modifications to the loan’s structure. During the nine months ended September 30, 2016, $4.2 million of TDR modifications included an interest rate concession and $49.8 million of TDR modifications resulted from modifications to the loan’s structure.
The following tables presenttable presents an analysis of the types of loans that were restructured and classified as TDRs, excluding loans classified as held for sale.
Three Months Ended September 30, 2017 Three Months Ended September 30, 2016Three Months Ended March 31, 2019 Three Months Ended March 31, 2018
Number of Contracts Post-Modification Outstanding Recorded Investment Number of Contracts Post-Modification Outstanding Recorded InvestmentNumber of Contracts Post-Modification Outstanding Recorded Investment Number of Contracts Post-Modification Outstanding Recorded Investment
(Dollars in Thousands)(Dollars in Thousands)
Commercial, financial and agricultural11
 $103,223
 4
 $31,676
3
 $11,570
 2
 $490
Real estate – construction
 
 1
 112

 
 1
 32
Commercial real estate – mortgage
 
 
 

 
 1
 1,383
Residential real estate – mortgage9
 1,665
 21
 2,868
20
 5,233
 17
 4,119
Equity lines of credit7
 368
 30
 1,468

 
 
 
Equity loans10
 342
 6
 635
4
 176
 7
 1,271
Credit card
 
 
 

 
 
 
Consumer direct
 
 2
 15
13
 3,519
 
 
Consumer indirect1
 5
 56
 917

 
 
 
Covered loans
 
 
 
 Nine Months Ended September 30, 2017 Nine Months Ended September 30, 2016
 Number of Contracts Post-Modification Outstanding Recorded Investment Number of Contracts Post-Modification Outstanding Recorded Investment
 (Dollars in Thousands)
Commercial, financial and agricultural24
 $205,387
 9
 $32,026
Real estate – construction
 
 2
 3,504
Commercial real estate – mortgage2
 502
 5
 1,431
Residential real estate – mortgage44
 8,763
 59
 10,654
Equity lines of credit34
 1,708
 66
 3,237
Equity loans26
 1,031
 15
 1,129
Credit card
 
 
 
Consumer direct
 
 3
 24
Consumer indirect14
 209
 119
 1,999
Covered loans2
 103
 
 
The impact to the allowance for loan losses related to modifications classified as TDRs were approximately $3.7 million for the three months ended March 31, 2019. Charge-offs and changes to the allowance related to modifications classified as TDRs were approximately $20.3 million and $26.1 millionnot material for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017, respectively. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016, charge-offs and changes to the allowance related to modifications classified as TDRs were not material.March 31, 2018.
The Company considers TDRs aged 90 days or more past due, charged off or classified as nonaccrual subsequent to modification, where the loan was not classified as a nonperforming loan at the time of modification, as subsequently defaulted.

The following tables providetable provides a summary of initial subsequent defaults that occurred within one year of the restructure date. The table excludes loans classified as held for sale as of period-end and includes loans no longer in default as of period-end.
Three Months Ended September 30, 2017 Three Months Ended September 30, 2016Three Months Ended March 31, 2019 Three Months Ended March 31, 2018
Number of Contracts Recorded Investment at Default Number of Contracts Recorded Investment at DefaultNumber of Contracts Recorded Investment at Default Number of Contracts Recorded Investment at Default
(Dollars in Thousands)(Dollars in Thousands)
Commercial, financial and agricultural
 $
 
 $

 $
 
 $
Real estate – construction
 
 
 

 
 
 
Commercial real estate – mortgage
 
 
 

 
 
 
Residential real estate – mortgage
 
 
 

 
 1
 80
Equity lines of credit
 
 8
 204

 
 
 
Equity loans
 
 1
 42
2
 151
 2
 132
Credit card
 
 
 

 
 
 
Consumer direct
 
 
 
2
 15
 
 
Consumer indirect
 
 1
 13

 
 
 
Covered loans
 
 
 
 Nine Months Ended September 30, 2017 Nine Months Ended September 30, 2016
 Number of Contracts Recorded Investment at Default Number of Contracts Recorded Investment at Default
 (Dollars in Thousands)
Commercial, financial and agricultural
 $
 
 $
Real estate – construction
 
 
 
Commercial real estate – mortgage
 
 
 
Residential real estate – mortgage1
 505
 
 
Equity lines of credit
 
 8
 204
Equity loans2
 51
 1
 42
Credit card
 
 
 
Consumer direct
 
 
 
Consumer indirect1
 22
 2
 32
Covered loans
 
 
 
The Company’s allowance for loan losses is largely driven by updated risk ratings assigned to commercial loans, updated borrower credit scores on consumer loans, and borrower delinquency history in both commercial and consumer portfolios.  As such, the provision for loan losses is impacted primarily by changes in borrower payment performance rather than TDR classification.  In addition, allAll commercial and consumer loans modified in a TDR are considered to be impaired, even if they maintain their accrual status.
At September 30, 2017March 31, 2019 and December 31, 2016,2018, there were $8.0$56.6 million and $12.6$54.2 million,, respectively, of commitments to lend additional funds to borrowers whose terms have been modified in a TDR.

Foreclosure Proceedings
OREO totaled $22$15 million and $21$17 million at September 30, 2017March 31, 2019 and December 31, 2016,2018, respectively. OREO included $16 million and $18$14 million of foreclosed residential real estate properties at September 30, 2017both March 31, 2019 and December 31, 2016, respectively.2018. As of September 30, 2017March 31, 2019 and December 31, 2016,2018, there were $59$74 million and $48$62 million, respectively, of residential real estate loans secured by residential real estate properties for which formal foreclosure proceedings were in process.
(4) Loan Sales and Servicing
Loans held for sale were $78 million$1.3 billion and $162$69 million at September 30, 2017March 31, 2019 and December 31, 2016,2018, respectively.

Loans held for sale at September 30, 2017,March 31, 2019 were comprised entirelyof $1.2 billion of commercial, financial and agricultural loans and $77 million of residential real estate — mortgage loans. Loans held for sale at December 31, 2016,2018 were comprised of $57 million of commercial, financial and agricultural loans and $105 millionentirely of residential real estate — mortgage loans.
The following table summarizes the Company's activity in the loans held for sale portfolio and loan sales, excluding activity related to loans originated for sale in the secondary market.
Three Months Ended September 30, Nine Months Ended September 30,Three Months Ended March 31,
2017 2016 2017 20162019 2018
(In Thousands)(In Thousands)
Loans transferred from held for investment to held for sale$
 $
 $
 $764,022
$1,196,883
 $
Charge-offs on loans recognized at transfer from held for investment to held for sale
 
 
 

 
Loans and loans held for sale sold
 121,745
 175,088
 1,007,096
144,674
 8,475
The following table summarizes the Company's sales of loans originated for sale in the secondary market.
Three Months Ended September 30, Nine Months Ended September 30,Three Months Ended March 31,
2017 2016 2017 20162019 2018
(In Thousands)(In Thousands)
Residential real estate loans originated for sale in the secondary market sold (1)$164,075
 $199,073
 $496,891
 $482,860
$119,722
 $132,470
Net gains recognized on sales of residential real estate loans originated for sale in the secondary market (2)7,322
 9,024
 19,178
 21,705
5,135
 3,529
Servicing fees recognized (2)2,672
 2,800
(1)IncludesThe Company has retained servicing responsibilities for all loans sold that were originated for sale wherein the Company retained servicing responsibilities.secondary market.
(2)Net gains were recorded inRecorded as a component of mortgage banking income in the Company's Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income.
Residential Real Estate Mortgage Loans Sold with Retained Servicing
The following table summarizes the Company's activity related to residential real estate mortgage loans sold with retained servicing.
 Three Months Ended September 30, Nine Months Ended September 30,
 2017 2016 2017 2016
 (In Thousands)
Residential real estate mortgage loans sold with retained servicing$164,075
 $199,073
 $496,891
 $798,756
Servicing fees recognized (1)6,173
 6,710
 19,083
 19,376
(1)Recorded as a component of other noninterest income in the Company's Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income.

The following table provides the recorded balance of loans sold with retained servicing and the related MSRs.
September 30, 2017 December 31, 2016March 31, 2019 December 31, 2018
(In Thousands)(In Thousands)
Recorded balance of residential real estate mortgage loans sold with retained servicing (1)$4,652,024
 $4,684,899
$4,566,191
 $4,588,273
MSRs (2)48,550
 51,428
47,545
 51,539
(1)These loans are not included in loans on the Company's Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets.
(2)Recorded under the fair value method and included in other assets on the Company's Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets.

The fair value of MSRs is significantly affected by mortgage interest rates available in the marketplace, which influence mortgage loan prepayment speeds. In general, during periods of declining rates, the fair value of MSRs declines due to increasing prepayments attributable to increased mortgage-refinance activity. During periods of rising interest rates, the fair value of MSRs generally increases due to reduced refinance activity. The Company maintains a non-qualifying hedging strategy to manage a portion of the risk associated with changes in the fair value of the MSR portfolio.  This strategy includes the purchase of various trading securities.  The interest income, mark-to-market adjustments and gain or loss from sale activities associated with these securities are expected to economically hedge a portion of the change in the fair value of the MSR portfolio.
The following table is an analysis of the activity in the Company’s MSRs.
Three Months Ended September 30, Nine Months Ended September 30,Three Months Ended March 31,
2017 2016 2017 20162019 2018
(In Thousands)(In Thousands)
Carrying value, at beginning of period$49,398
 $36,496
 $51,428
 $44,541
$51,539
 $49,597
Additions1,729
 1,933
 5,328
 7,583
1,059
 1,543
Increase (decrease) in fair value:          
Due to changes in valuation inputs or assumptions721
 3,250
 (100) (5,391)(2,343) 4,757
Due to other changes in fair value (1)(3,298) (2,652) (8,106) (7,706)(2,710) (2,872)
Carrying value, at end of period$48,550
 $39,027
 $48,550
 $39,027
$47,545
 $53,025
(1)Represents the realization of expected net servicing cash flows, expected borrower repayments and the passage of time.
See Note 8,9, Fair Value of Financial Instruments,Measurements, for additional disclosures related to the assumptions and estimates used in determining fair value of MSRs.
At September 30, 2017March 31, 2019 and December 31, 2016,2018, the sensitivity of the current fair value of the residential MSRs to immediate 10% and 20% adverse changes in key economic assumptions are included in the following table:
September 30, 2017 December 31, 2016March 31, 2019 December 31, 2018
(Dollars in Thousands)(Dollars in Thousands)
Fair value of MSRs$48,550
 $51,428
$47,545
 $51,539
Composition of residential loans serviced for others:      
Fixed rate mortgage loans97.4% 97.3%97.8% 97.7%
Adjustable rate mortgage loans2.6
 2.7
2.2
 2.3
Total100.0% 100.0%100.0% 100.0%
Weighted average life (in years)6.1
 6.5
6.1
 6.6
Prepayment speed:11.3% 15.7%7.8% 7.4%
Effect on fair value of a 10% increase$(1,531) $(1,646)$(1,273) $(1,432)
Effect on fair value of a 20% increase(2,970) (3,184)(2,442) (2,778)
Weighted average option adjusted spread:8.2% 8.1%6.5% 6.5%
Effect on fair value of a 10% increase$(1,720) $(1,758)$(1,781) $(1,627)
Effect on fair value of a 20% increase(3,315) (3,402)(3,375) (3,116)
The sensitivity calculations above are hypothetical and should not be considered to be predictive of future performance. As indicated, changes in fair value based on adverse changes in assumptions generally cannot be extrapolated because the relationship of the change in assumption to the change in fair value may not be linear. Also, in this table, the effect of an adverse variation in a particular assumption on the fair value of the MSRs is calculated without changing any other assumption; while in reality, changes in one assumption may result in changes to another, which may magnify or counteract the effect of the change.

(5) Derivatives and Hedging
The Company is a party to derivative instruments in the normal course of business to meet the financing needs of its customers and to reduce its own exposure to fluctuations in interest rates and foreign currency exchange rates. The Company has made an accounting policy decision not to offset derivative fair value amounts under master netting agreements. See Summary of Significant Accounting Policies in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016,2018, for additional information on the Company's accounting policies related to derivative instruments and hedging activities. For derivatives cleared through central clearing houses the variation margin payments made are legally characterized as settlements of the derivatives. As a result, these variation margin payments are netted against the fair value of the respective derivative contracts in the balance sheet and related disclosures. The following table reflects the notional amount and fair value of derivative instruments included on the Company’s Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets on a gross basis.
September 30, 2017 (4) December 31, 2016March 31, 2019 December 31, 2018
  Fair Value   Fair Value  Fair Value   Fair Value
Notional Amount Derivative Assets (1) Derivative Liabilities (2) Notional Amount Derivative Assets (1) Derivative Liabilities (2)Notional Amount Derivative Assets (1) Derivative Liabilities (2) Notional Amount Derivative Assets (1) Derivative Liabilities (2)
(In Thousands)(In Thousands)
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments:                      
Fair value hedges:                      
Interest rate swaps related to long-term debt$2,473,950
 $24,296
 $14,323
 $2,123,950
 $38,890
 $14,226
$2,923,950
 $12,085
 $17,266
 $2,923,950
 $13,479
 $28,479
Total fair value hedges  24,296
 14,323
   38,890
 14,226
  12,085
 17,266
   13,479
 28,479
Cash flow hedges:                      
Interest rate contracts:                      
Swaps related to commercial loans9,175,000
 45
 24,178
 7,625,000
 2,340
 11,570
3,500,000
 
 6,052
 1,500,000
 2,367
 
Swaps related to FHLB advances120,000
 
 5,950
 120,000
 
 7,093
120,000
 
 2,371
 120,000
 
 1,938
Foreign currency contracts:                      
Forwards related to currency fluctuations1,543
 340
 
 3,618
 
 380
4,079
 215
 
 5,272
 174
 
Total cash flow hedges  385
 30,128
   2,340
 19,043
  215
 8,423
   2,541
 1,938
Total derivatives designated as hedging instruments  $24,681
 $44,451
   $41,230
 $33,269
  $12,300
 $25,689
   $16,020
 $30,417
                      
Free-standing derivatives not designated as hedging instruments:Free-standing derivatives not designated as hedging instruments:          Free-standing derivatives not designated as hedging instruments:          
Interest rate contracts:                      
Forward contracts related to held for sale mortgages$173,500
 $180
 $199
 $251,500
 $2,479
 $493
$209,734
 $224
 $1,148
 $166,641
 $187
 $1,021
Option contracts related to mortgage servicing rights45,000
 77
 
 
 
 
40,000
 456
 
 
 
 
Interest rate lock commitments144,240
 2,924
 1
 150,616
 2,424
 32
139,548
 3,158
 
 91,395
 2,012
 
Equity contracts:                      
Purchased equity option related to equity-linked CDs815,307
 42,415
 
 833,763
 57,198
 
386,421
 13,168
 
 450,660
 14,185
 
Written equity option related to equity-linked CDs730,504
 
 38,351
 770,632
 
 53,044
331,719
 
 11,438
 389,030
 
 12,434
Foreign exchange contracts:                      
Forwards and swaps related to commercial loans404,986
 2,215
 1,874
 424,155
 3,741
 1,723
398,169
 2,823
 666
 413,127
 1,565
 1,109
Spots related to commercial loans31,680
 62
 
 54,599
 134
 
14,053
 15
 8
 19,911
 24
 2
Swap associated with sale of Visa, Inc. Class B shares92,139
 
 2,303
 68,308
 
 1,708
133,571
 
 5,115
 111,466
 
 3,706
Futures contracts (3)795,000
 
 
 104,000
 
 
3,462,000
 
 
 3,223,000
 
 
Trading account assets and liabilities:                      
Interest rate contracts for customers30,771,530
 224,561
 174,414
 28,000,014
 290,238
 228,748
34,636,125
 210,707
 101,105
 34,436,223
 149,269
 130,704
Foreign exchange contracts for customers1,039,862
 15,696
 13,851
 870,084
 28,367
 26,317
1,193,220
 19,139
 16,865
 1,140,665
 19,465
 17,341
Total trading account assets and liabilities  240,257
 188,265
   318,605
 255,065
  229,846
 117,970
   168,734
 148,045
Total free-standing derivative instruments not designated as hedging instruments  $288,130
 $230,993
   $384,581
 $312,065
  $249,690
 $136,345
   $186,707
 $166,317
(1)Derivative assets, except for trading account assets that are recorded as a component of trading account assets on the Company's Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets, are recorded in other assets on the Company’s Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets.
(2)
Derivative liabilities are recorded in accrued expenses and other liabilities on the Company’s Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets.
Sheets.
(3)Changes in fair value are cash settled daily; therefore, there is no ending balance at any given reporting period.
(4)In January 2017, a clearing organization adopted a rule change that requires transactions to be considered settled-to-market each day. Beginning in the first quarter of 2017, to the extent the Company determined transactions with this clearing organization to be settled-to-market, the impact was a reduction to the derivative assets and liabilities as well as a corresponding decrease in cash collateral.

Hedging Derivatives
The Company uses derivative instruments to manage the risk of earnings fluctuations caused by interest rate volatility. For those financial instruments that qualify and are designated as a hedging relationship, either a fair value hedge or cash flow hedge, the effect of interest rate movements on the hedged assets or liabilities will generally be offset by change in fair value of the derivative instrument.
Fair Value Hedges
The Company enters into fair value hedging relationships using interest rate swaps to mitigate the Company’s exposure to losses in value as interest rates change. Derivative instruments that are used as part of the Company’s interest rate risk management strategy include interest rate swaps that relate to the pricing of specific balance sheet assets and liabilities. Interest rate swaps generally involve the exchange of fixed and variable rate interest payments between two parties, based on a common notional principal amount and maturity date.
Interest rate swaps are used to convert the Company’s fixed rate long-term debt to a variable rate. The critical terms of the interest rate swaps match the terms of the corresponding hedged items. All components of each derivative instrument’s gain or loss are included in the assessment of hedge effectiveness.
The Company recognized no gains or losses for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017March 31, 2019 and 2016,2018, related to hedged firm commitments no longer qualifying as a fair value hedge. At September 30, 2017,March 31, 2019, the fair value hedges had a weighted average expected remaining term of 4.23.1 years.
The following table reflects the change in fair value for interest rate contracts and the related hedged items as well as other gains and losses related to fair value hedges including gains and losses recognized because of hedge ineffectiveness.
   Gain (Loss) for the
 Condensed Consolidated Three Months Ended September 30, Nine Months Ended September 30,
 Statements of Income Caption 2017 2016 2017 2016
   (In Thousands)
Change in fair value of interest rate contracts:        
Interest rate swaps hedging long term debtInterest on FHLB and other borrowings $(6,637) $(20,209) $(14,691) $45,101
Hedged long term debtInterest on FHLB and other borrowings 6,614
 19,246
 14,532
 (39,978)
Other gains on interest rate contracts:        
Interest and amortization related to interest rate swaps on hedged long term debtInterest on FHLB and other borrowings 7,690
 10,489
 24,239
 31,834
Cash Flow Hedges
The Company enters into cash flow hedging relationships using interest rate swaps and options, such as caps and floors, to mitigate exposure to the variability in future cash flows or other forecasted transactions associated with its floating rate assets and liabilities. The Company uses interest rate swaps and options to hedge the repricing characteristics of its floating rate commercial loans and FHLB advances. The Company also uses foreign currency forward contracts to hedge its exposure to fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates due to a portion of money transfer expense being denominated in foreign currency. All components of each derivative instrument’s gain or loss are included in the assessment of hedge effectiveness. The initial assessment of expected hedge effectiveness is based on regression analysis. The ongoing periodic measures of hedge ineffectiveness are based on the expected change in cash flows of the hedged item caused by changes in the benchmark interest rate. There was $202 thousand and $229 thousand of cash flow hedging losses recognized because of hedge ineffectiveness for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017, respectively, and there waswere no material cash flow hedging gains or losses recognized because of hedge ineffectiveness for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016. There were no gains or losses reclassified from other comprehensive income because of the discontinuance of cash flow hedges related to certain forecasted transactions that are probable of not occurring for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017March 31, 2019 and 2016.2018.

At September 30, 2017,March 31, 2019, cash flow hedges not terminated had a net fair value of $(29.7)$(8) million and a weighted average life of 1.22.0 years. Net losses of $42.0$10.4 million are expected to be reclassified to income over the next 12 months as net settlements occur. The maximum length of time over which the entity is hedging its exposure to the variability in future cash flows for forecasted transactions is 3.84.8 years.

The following table presents the effect of hedging derivative instruments designated and qualifying as cash flow hedges on the Company’s Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets and the Company’s Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income.
 Gain (Loss) for the
 Three Months Ended 
 September 30,
 Nine Months Ended 
 September 30,
 2017 2016 2017 2016
 (In Thousands)
Interest rate and foreign currency exchange contracts:       
Net change in amount recognized in other comprehensive income$855
 $(1,461) $(9,172) $1,728
Amount reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) into net income(2,835) 702
 5,043
 1,678
Amount of ineffectiveness recognized in net income202
 
 229
 
  Interest Income Interest Expense
  Interest and fees on loans Interest on FHLB and other borrowings
  (In Thousands)
Three Months Ended March 31, 2019    
Total amounts presented in the unaudited condensed consolidated statements of income $800,488
 $37,626
     
Gains (losses) on fair value hedging relationships:    
Interest rate contracts:    
Amounts related to interest settlements and amortization on derivatives $
 $(2,348)
Recognized on derivatives 
 24,034
Recognized on hedged items 
 (22,643)
Net income (expense) recognized on fair value hedges $
 $(957)
     
Gain (losses) on cash flow hedging relationships: (1)    
Interest rate contracts:    
Realized losses reclassified from AOCI into net income (2) $(1,210) $(169)
Net income (expense) recognized on cash flow hedges $(1,210) $(169)
     
Three Months Ended March 31, 2018    
Total amounts presented in the unaudited condensed consolidated statements of income $663,935
 $24,756
     
Gains (losses) on fair value hedging relationships:    
Interest rate contracts:    
Amounts related to interest settlements and amortization on derivatives $
 $3,445
Recognized on derivatives 
 (39,366)
Recognized on hedged items 
 37,429
Net income (expense) recognized on fair value hedges $
 $1,508
     
Gain (losses) on cash flow hedging relationships: (1)    
Interest rate contracts:    
Realized losses reclassified from AOCI into net income (2) $(8,890) $(495)
Net income (expense) recognized on cash flow hedges $(8,890) $(495)
(1)See Note 10, Comprehensive Income, for gain or loss recognized for cash flow hedges in accumulated other comprehensive income.
(2)Pre-tax
The following table presents the carrying amount and associated cumulative basis adjustment related to the application of hedge accounting that is included in the carrying amount of hedged assets and liabilities on the Company's Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets in fair value hedging relationships.
  March 31, 2019
    Cumulative Amount of Fair Value Hedging Adjustment Included in the Carrying Amount of Hedged Liabilities
  Carrying Amount of Hedged Liabilities Hedged Items Currently Designated Hedged Items No Longer Designated
  (In Thousands)
FHLB and other borrowings $3,481,395
 $(3,822) $3,525
Derivatives Not Designated As Hedges
Derivatives not designated as hedges include those that are entered into as either economic hedges to facilitate client needs or as part of the Company’s overall risk management strategy. Economic hedges are those that do not qualify

to be treated as a fair value hedge, cash flow hedge or foreign currency hedge for accounting purposes, but are necessary to economically manage the risk exposure associated with the assets and liabilities of the Company.
The Company holds a portfolio of futures, forwards and interest rate lock commitments as well as options related to its equity-linked CDs to mitigate its economic risk exposure. The Company also enters into a variety of interest rate contracts commodity contracts and foreign exchange contracts in its trading activities. The primary purpose for using these derivative instrumentsSee Note 13, Derivatives and Hedging, in the trading account isNotes to facilitate customer transactions. The interest rate contract portfolio classified as trading is actively managed and hedged with similar products to limit market value riskthe December 31, 2018, Consolidated Financial Statements for a description of the portfolio. Changes in the estimated fair value of contracts in the trading account along with the related interest settlements on the contracts are recorded in noninterest incomeCompany's derivatives not designated as corporate and correspondent investment sales in the Company's Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income.
The Company enters into forward contracts to economically hedge the change in fair value of certain residential mortgage loans held for sale due to changes in interest rates. Revaluation gains and losses from free-standing derivatives related to mortgage banking activity are recorded as a component of mortgage banking income in the Company’s Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income.
Interest rate lock commitments issued on residential mortgage loan commitments to be held for resale are also considered free-standing derivative instruments, and the interest rate exposure on these commitments is economically hedged primarily with forward contracts. Revaluation gains and losses from free-standing derivatives related to mortgage banking activity are recorded as a component of mortgage banking income in the Company's Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income.
In conjunction with the sale of its Visa, Inc. Class B shares in 2009, the Company entered into a total return swap in which the Company will make or receive payments based on subsequent changes in the conversion rate of the Class B shares into Class A shares. This total return swap is accounted for as a free-standing derivative.
The Company offers its customers equity-linked CDs that have a return linked to individual equities and equity indices. Under appropriate accounting guidance, a CD that pays interest based on changes in an equity index is a hybrid instrument that requires separation into a host contract (the CD) and an embedded derivative contract (written equity call option). The Company has entered into an offsetting derivative contract in order to economically hedge the exposure related to the issuance of equity-linked CDs. Both the embedded derivative and derivative contract entered into by the Company are classified as free-standing derivative instruments that are recorded at fair value with offsetting gains and

losses recognized within noninterest expense in the Company's Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income.
The Company also enters into foreign currency contracts to hedge its exposure to fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates due to its funding of commercial loans in foreign currencies.hedges.
The net gains and losses recorded in the Company's Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income from free-standing derivative instruments not designated as hedging instruments are summarized in the following table.
 Gain (Loss) for the Gain (Loss) for the
Condensed Consolidated Three Months Ended September 30, Nine Months Ended September 30,Condensed Consolidated Three Months Ended March 31,
Statements of Income Caption 2017 2016 2017 2016Statements of Income Caption 2019 2018
 (In Thousands) (In Thousands)
Futures contracts
Mortgage banking income
 and corporate and correspondent investment sales
 $(18) $86
 $(1) $(229)
Mortgage banking income
 and corporate and correspondent investment sales
 $(579) $72
Interest rate contracts:            
Forward contracts related to residential mortgage loans held for saleMortgage banking income (46) 1,094
 (2,005) (2,027)Mortgage banking income (89) 80
Option contracts related to mortgage servicing rightsMortgage banking income (253) 
 (391) (264)
Interest rate lock commitmentsMortgage banking income (262) (162) 531
 1,655
Mortgage banking income 1,146
 192
Interest rate contracts for customersCorporate and correspondent investment sales 5,979
 5,371
 21,318
 14,780
Corporate and correspondent investment sales 3,428
 8,564
Commodity contracts:        
Commodity contracts for customersCorporate and correspondent investment sales 
 (1) 
 (6)
Option contracts related to mortgage servicing rightsMortgage banking income 294
 (38)
Equity contracts:            
Purchased equity option related to equity-linked CDsOther expense (8,921) (3,716) (14,783) 1,782
Other expense (1,017) (7,082)
Written equity option related to equity-linked CDsOther expense 8,643
 3,625
 14,692
 (672)Other expense 996
 6,523
Foreign currency contracts:            
Forward and swap contracts related to commercial loansOther income (13,107) (1,517) (36,373) (5,173)Other income 2,696
 (219)
Spot contracts related to commercial loansOther income 1,620
 1,471
 4,175
 91
Other income (502) (922)
Foreign currency exchange contracts for customersCorporate and correspondent investment sales 2,709
 1,305
 7,770
 2,954
Corporate and correspondent investment sales 3,851
 3,541
Derivatives Credit and Market Risks
By using derivative instruments, the Company is exposed to credit and market risk. If the counterparty fails to perform, credit risk is equal to the extent of the Company’s fair value gain in a derivative. When the fair value of a derivative instrument contract is positive, this generally indicates that the counterparty owes the Company and, therefore, creates a credit risk for the Company. When the fair value of a derivative instrument contract is negative, the Company owes the counterparty and, therefore, it has no credit risk. The Company minimizes the credit risk in derivative instruments by entering into transactions with high-quality counterparties that are reviewed periodically. Credit losses are also mitigated through collateral agreements and other contract provisions with derivative counterparties.
Market risk is the adverse effect that a change in interest rates or implied volatility rates has on the value of a financial instrument. The Company manages the market risk associated with interest rate contracts by establishing and monitoring limits as to the types and degree of risk that may be undertaken.

The Company’s derivatives activities are monitored by its Asset/Liability Committee as part of its risk-management oversight. The Company’s Asset/Liability Committee is responsible for mandating various hedging strategies that are developed through its analysis of data from financial simulation models and other internal and industry sources. The resulting hedging strategies are then incorporated into the Company’s overall interest rate risk management and trading strategies.

Entering into interest rate swap agreements and options involves not only the risk of dealing with counterparties and their ability to meet the terms of the contracts but also interest rate risk associated with unmatched positions. At September 30, 2017,March 31, 2019, interest rate swap agreements and options classified as trading were substantially matched. The Company had credit risk of $240$230 million related to derivative instruments in the trading account portfolio, which does not take into consideration master netting arrangements or the value of the collateral. There were no credit losses associated with derivative instruments classified as trading for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017. There were $2.6 millionMarch 31, 2019 and $2.5 million of net credit losses associated with derivative instruments classified as trading for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016, respectively.2018. At September 30, 2017March 31, 2019 and December 31, 2016,2018, there were no material nonperforming derivative positions classified as trading.
The Company’s derivative positions designated as hedging instruments are primarily executed in the over-the-counter market. These positions at September 30, 2017,March 31, 2019, have credit risk of $25$12 million,, which does not take into consideration master netting arrangements or the value of the collateral.
There were no credit losses associated with derivative instruments classified as nontrading for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017March 31, 2019 and 2016.2018. At September 30, 2017March 31, 2019 and December 31, 2016,2018, there were no nonperforming derivative positions classified as nontrading.
As of September 30, 2017March 31, 2019 and December 31, 2016,2018, the Company had recorded the right to reclaim cash collateral of $108$80 million and $103$97 million,, respectively, within other assets on the Company’s Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets and had recorded the obligation to return cash collateral of $55$28 million and $37$22 million,, respectively, within deposits on the Company’s Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets.
Contingent Features
Certain of the Company’s derivative instruments contain provisions that require the Company’s debt maintain a certain credit rating from each of the major credit rating agencies. If the Company’s debt were to fall below this rating, it would be in violation of these provisions, and the counterparties to the derivative instruments could demand immediate and ongoing full overnight collateralization on derivative instruments in net liability positions. The aggregate fair value of all derivative instruments with credit-risk-related contingent features that were in a liability position on September 30, 2017,March 31, 2019, was $30$29 million for which the Company has collateral requirements of $29$28 million in the normal course of business. If the credit risk-related contingent features underlying these agreements had been triggered on September 30, 2017,March 31, 2019, the Company’s collateral requirements to its counterparties would require an additional increase of $1 million.by $1 million. The aggregate fair value of all derivative instruments with credit risk-related contingent features that were in a liability position on December 31, 2016,2018, was $30$24 million for which the Company had collateral requirements of $29$23 million in the normal course of business. If the credit risk-related contingent features underlying these agreements had been triggered on December 31, 2016,2018, the Company’s collateral requirements to its counterparties would have increased by $1 million.$1 million.
Netting of Derivative Instruments
The Company is party to master netting arrangements with its financial institution counterparties for some of its derivative and hedging activities. The Company does not offset assets and liabilities under these master netting arrangements for financial statement presentation purposes. The master netting arrangements provide for single net settlement of all derivative instrument arrangements, as well as collateral, in the event of default with respect to, or termination of, any one contract with the respective counterparties. Cash collateral is usually posted by the counterparty with a net liability position in accordance with contract thresholds.

The following table represents the Company’s total gross derivative instrument assets and liabilities subject to an enforceable master netting arrangement. The derivative instruments the Company has with its customers are not subject to an enforceable master netting arrangement.
Gross Amounts Recognized Gross Amounts Offset in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets Net Amount Presented in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets Financial Instruments Collateral Received/Pledged (1) Cash Collateral Received/ Pledged (1) Net AmountGross Amounts Recognized Gross Amounts Offset in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets Net Amount Presented in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets Financial Instruments Collateral Received/Pledged (1) Cash Collateral Received/ Pledged (1) Net Amount
(In Thousands)(In Thousands)
September 30, 2017           
March 31, 2019           
Derivative financial assets:                      
Subject to a master netting arrangement$160,210
 $
 $160,210
 $
 $29,699
 $130,511
$78,151
 $
 $78,151
 $
 $24,339
 $53,812
Not subject to a master netting arrangement152,601
 
 152,601
 
 
 152,601
183,839
 
 183,839
 
 
 183,839
Total derivative financial assets$312,811
 $
 $312,811
 $
 $29,699
 $283,112
$261,990
 $
 $261,990
 $
 $24,339
 $237,651
                      
Derivative financial liabilities:                      
Subject to a master netting arrangement$196,021
 $
 $196,021
 $3,264
 $107,463
 $85,294
$93,166
 $
 $93,166
 $
 $80,395
 $12,771
Not subject to a master netting arrangement79,423
 
 79,423
 
 
 79,423
68,868
 
 68,868
 
 
 68,868
Total derivative financial liabilities$275,444
 $
 $275,444
 $3,264
 $107,463
 $164,717
$162,034
 $
 $162,034
 $
 $80,395
 $81,639
                      
December 31, 2016           
December 31, 2018           
Derivative financial assets:                      
Subject to a master netting arrangement$234,002
 $
 $234,002
 $
 $33,212
 $200,790
$82,168
 $
 $82,168
 $
 $18,932
 $63,236
Not subject to a master netting arrangement191,809
 
 191,809
 
 
 191,809
120,559
 
 120,559
 
 
 120,559
Total derivative financial assets$425,811
 $
 $425,811
 $
 $33,212
 $392,599
$202,727
 $
 $202,727
 $
 $18,932
 $183,795
                      
Derivative financial liabilities:                      
Subject to a master netting arrangement$248,669
 $
 $248,669
 $9,685
 $102,603
 $136,381
$99,579
 $
 $99,579
 $
 $96,917
 $2,662
Not subject to a master netting arrangement96,665
 
 96,665
 
 
 96,665
97,155
 
 97,155
 
 
 97,155
Total derivative financial liabilities$345,334
 $
 $345,334
 $9,685
 $102,603
 $233,046
$196,734
 $
 $196,734
 $
 $96,917
 $99,817
(1)The actual amount of collateral received/pledged is limited to the asset/liability balance and does not include excess collateral received/pledged. When excess collateral exists, the collateral shown in the table above has been allocated based on the percentage of the actual amount of collateral posted.
(6) Securities Financing Activities
Netting of Securities Purchased Under Agreements to Resell and Securities Sold Under Agreements to Repurchase
The Company has various financial assetassets and liabilities that are subject to enforceable master netting agreements or similar agreements. The Company's derivatives that are subject to enforceable master netting agreements or similar transactions are discussed in Note 5, Derivatives and Hedging. The Company enters into agreements under which it purchases or sells securities subject to an obligation to resell or repurchase the same or similar securities. Securities purchased under agreements to resell and securities sold under agreements to repurchase are generally accounted for as collateralized financing transactions and recorded at the amounts at which the securities were purchased or sold plus accrued interest. The securities pledged as collateral are generally U.S. Treasury securities and other U.S. government agency securities and mortgage-backed securities.
Securities purchased under agreements to resell and securities sold under agreements to repurchase are governed by a MRA. Under the terms of the MRA, all transactions between the Company and the counterparty constitute a single business relationship such that in the event of default, the nondefaulting party is entitled to set off claims and apply property held by that party in respect of any transaction against obligations owed. Any payments, deliveries, or other transfers may be applied against each other and netted. These amounts are limited to the contract asset/liability balance,

and accordingly, do not include excess collateral received or pledged. The Company offsets the assets and liabilities

under netting arrangements for the balance sheet presentation of securities purchased under agreements to resell and securities sold under agreements to repurchase provided certain criteria are met that permit balance sheet netting.
Gross Amounts Recognized Gross Amounts Offset in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets Net Amount Presented in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets Financial Instruments Collateral Received/Pledged (1) Cash Collateral Received/ Pledged (1) Net AmountGross Amounts Recognized Gross Amounts Offset in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets Net Amount Presented in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets Financial Instruments Collateral Received/Pledged (1) Cash Collateral Received/ Pledged (1) Net Amount
(In Thousands)(In Thousands)
September 30, 2017 (2)           
March 31, 2019           
Securities purchased under agreements to resell:Securities purchased under agreements to resell:          Securities purchased under agreements to resell:          
Subject to a master netting arrangement$484,445
 $343,325
 $141,120
 $141,120
 $
 $
$279,283
 $91,836
 $187,447
 $187,447
 $
 $
                      
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase:Securities sold under agreements to repurchase:          Securities sold under agreements to repurchase:          
Subject to a master netting arrangement$388,086
 $343,325
 $44,761
 $44,761
 $
 $
$274,800
 $91,836
 $182,964
 $182,964
 $
 $
                      
December 31, 2016 (2)           
December 31, 2018           
Securities purchased under agreements to resell:Securities purchased under agreements to resell:          Securities purchased under agreements to resell:          
Subject to a master netting arrangement$3,164,039
 $3,069,489
 $94,550
 $94,550
 $
 $
$246,844
 $136,897
 $109,947
 $109,947
 $
 $
                      
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase:Securities sold under agreements to repurchase:          Securities sold under agreements to repurchase:          
Subject to a master netting arrangement$3,095,655
 $3,069,488
 $26,167
 $26,167
 $
 $
$239,172
 $136,897
 $102,275
 $102,275
 $
 $
(1)The actual amount of collateral received/pledged is limited to the asset/liability balance and does not include excess collateral received/pledged. When excess collateral exists, the collateral shown in the table above has been allocated based on the percentage of the actual amount of collateral posted.
(2)The decrease in gross amounts recognized from December 31, 2016 to September 30, 2017, relates to a reduction in securities purchased under agreements to resell and securities sold under agreements to repurchase held by BSI.


Collateral Associated with Securities Financing Activities
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase are accounted for as secured borrowings. The following table presents the Company's related activity, by collateral type and remaining contractual maturity.
 Remaining Contractual Maturity of the Agreements Remaining Contractual Maturity of the Agreements
 Overnight and Continuous Up to 30 days 30 - 90 days Greater Than 90 days Total Overnight and Continuous Up to 30 days 30 - 90 days Greater Than 90 days Total
 (In Thousands) (In Thousands)
September 30, 2017          
March 31, 2019          
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase:Securities sold under agreements to repurchase:        Securities sold under agreements to repurchase:        
U.S. Treasury and other U.S. government agencies $275,860
 $
 $44,761
 $
 $320,621
 $201,148
 $29,095
 $
 $
 $230,243
Mortgage-backed securities 
 
 67,465
 
 67,465
 
 
 44,557
 
 44,557
Total $275,860
 $
 $112,226
 $
 $388,086
 $201,148
 $29,095
 $44,557
 $
 $274,800
                    
December 31, 2016          
December 31, 2018          
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase:Securities sold under agreements to repurchase:        Securities sold under agreements to repurchase:        
U.S. Treasury and other U.S. government agencies $1,408,736
 $806,526
 $798,089
 $
 $3,013,351
 $190,650
 $
 $
 $
 $190,650
Mortgage-backed securities 
 
 82,304
 
 82,304
 
 
 48,522
 
 48,522
Total $1,408,736
 $806,526
 $880,393
 $
 $3,095,655
 $190,650
 $
 $48,522
 $
 $239,172
In the event of a significant decline in fair value of the collateral pledged for the securities sold under agreements to repurchase, the Company would be required to provide additional collateral. The Company minimizes the risk by monitoring the liquidity and credit quality of the collateral, as well as the maturity profile of the transactions.
At September 30, 2017,March 31, 2019, the fair value of collateral received related to securities purchased under agreements to resell was $552$283 million and the fair value of collateral pledged for securities sold under agreements to repurchase was $392$280 million. At December 31, 2016,2018, the fair value of collateral received related to securities purchased under agreements

to resell was $3.1 billion$251 million and the fair value of collateral pledged for securities sold under agreements to repurchase was $3.1 billion.$247 million.
(7) Leases
The Company leases certain land, office space, and branches. These leases are generally for periods of 10 to 20 years with various renewal options. The Company, by policy, does not include renewal options for facility leases as part of its right-of-use assets and lease liabilities unless they are deemed reasonably certain to be exercised. Variable lease payments that are dependent on an index or a rate are initially measured using the index or rate at the commencement date and are included in the measurement of lease liability. Variable lease payments that are not dependent on an index or a rate or changes in variable payments based on an index or rate after the commencement date are excluded from the measurement of the lease liability and recognized in profit and loss in accordance with Topic 842. Variable lease payments are defined as payments made for the right to use an asset that vary because of changes in facts or circumstances occurring after the commencement date, other than the passage of time.
The Company has made a policy election to not apply the recognition requirements of ASC 842 to all short-term leases. Instead, the short-term lease payments will be recognized in profit or loss on a straight-line basis over the lease term and variable lease payments in the period in which the obligation for those payments is incurred. As a practical expedient, the Company has also made a policy election to not separate nonlease components from lease components and instead account for each separate lease component and the nonlease components associated with that lease component as a single lease component.
The Company determines whether a contract contains a lease based on whether a contract, or a part of a contract, that conveys the right to control the use of an identified asset for a period of time in exchange for consideration. The discount rate is determined as the rate implicit in the lease or when a rate cannot be readily determined, the Company’s incremental borrowing rate. The incremental borrowing rate is the rate of interest that the Company would have to pay to borrow on a collateralized basis over a similar term an amount equal to the lease payments in a similar economic environment.
The following table summarizes the Company’s lease portfolio classification and respective right-of-use asset balances and lease liability balances which are included in other assets and accrued expenses and other liabilities, respectively, on the Company’s Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets.
  March 31, 2019
  Finance Operating Total
  (In Thousands)
Right-of-use asset $9,558
 $289,830
 $299,388
Lease liability balance 13,541
 328,576
 342,117
The table below presents information about the Company's total lease costs which include amounts recognized on the Company’s Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income during the period.
  Three Months Ended March 31,
  2019
  (In Thousands)
Interest on lease liabilities $159
Amortization of right-of-use assets 331
Finance lease cost 490
Operating lease cost 12,834
Variable lease cost 3,966
Sublease income (504)
Total lease cost $16,786


The table below presents supplemental cash flow information arising from lease transactions and noncash information on lease liabilities arising from obtaining right-of-use assets.
  Three Months Ended March 31,
  2019
  (In Thousands)
Cash paid for amounts included in measurement of liabilities  
Operating cash flows from operating leases $13,417
Operating cash flows from finance leases 159
Financing cash flows from finance leases 386
Right-of-use assets obtained in exchange for lease obligations  
Operating leases 22,108
Finance leases 
The weighted-average remaining lease term and discount rates at March 31, 2019 were as follows:
  Finance Operating Total
Weighted-average remaining lease term 9.0 years
 9.9 years
 9.8 years
Weighted-average discount rate 4.7% 3.4% 3.4%
The following table provides the annual undiscounted future minimum payments under finance and noncanceable operating leases at March 31, 2019:
  Finance Operating Total
  (In Thousands)
Remainder of 2019 $1,651
 $41,527
 $43,178
2020 2,233
 53,253
 55,486
2021 2,143
 48,995
 51,138
2022 1,923
 44,011
 45,934
2023 1,501
 38,157
 39,658
2024 1,410
 29,534
 30,944
Thereafter 5,696
 132,191
 137,887
Total $16,557
 $387,668
 $404,225
At March 31, 2019 the Company had no additional operating or finance leases that had not yet commenced that would create significant rights and obligations for the Company as a lessee.
The table below presents a reconciliation of the undiscounted cash flows to the finance lease liabilities and operating lease liabilities.
  March 31, 2019
  Finance Operating Total
  (In Thousands)
Total undiscounted lease liability $16,557
 $387,668
 $404,225
Less: imputed interest 3,016
 59,092
 62,108
Total discounted lease liability $13,541
 $328,576
 $342,117

(8) Commitments, Contingencies and Guarantees
Commitments to Extend Credit & Standby and Commercial Letters of Credit
The following represents the Company’s commitments to extend credit, standby letters of credit and commercial letters of credit:
September 30, 2017 December 31, 2016March 31, 2019 December 31, 2018
(In Thousands)(In Thousands)
Commitments to extend credit$27,548,488
 $27,070,935
$27,906,018
 $28,827,897
Standby and commercial letters of credit1,383,185
 1,474,405
1,167,342
 1,249,205
Commitments to extend credit are agreements to lend to customers as long as there is no violation of any condition established in the contract. Commitments generally have fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses and may require payment of a fee. Since many of the commitments are expected to expire without being drawn upon, the total commitment amounts do not necessarily represent future cash requirements.
Standby and commercial letters of credit are commitments issued by the Company to guarantee the performance of a customer to a third party. These guarantees are primarily issued to support public and private borrowing arrangements, including commercial paper, bond financing and similar transactions, and expire in decreasing amounts with terms ranging from one to four years.

The credit risk involved in issuing letters of credit and commitments is essentially the same as that involved in extending loan facilities to customers. The fair value of the letters of credit and commitments typically approximates the fee received from the customer for issuing such commitments. These fees are deferred and are recognized over the commitment period. At September 30, 2017March 31, 2019 and December 31, 2016,2018, the recorded amount of these deferred fees was $7$5 million and $8 million, respectively. The Company holds various assets as collateral supporting those commitments for which collateral is deemed necessary. At September 30, 2017,March 31, 2019, the maximum potential amount of future undiscounted payments the Company could be required to make under outstanding standby letters of credit was $1.4$1.2 billion. At September 30, 2017March 31, 2019 and December 31, 2016,2018, the Company had reserves related to letters of credit and unfunded commitments recorded in accrued expenses and other liabilities on the Company’s Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet of $81$68 million and $77$66 million, respectively.
Loan Sale Recourse
The Company has potential recourse related to specific FNMA securitizations. At both September 30, 2017March 31, 2019 and December 31, 2016,2018, the amount of potential recourse was $19 million of which the Company had reserved $766$793 thousand and $681 thousand, respectively, which is recorded in accrued expenses and other liabilities on the Company's Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets for the respective periods.
The Company also issues standard representations and warranties related to mortgage loan sales to government-sponsored agencies. Although these agreements often do not specify limitations, the Company does not believe that any payments related to these representations and warranties would materially change the financial condition or results of operations of the Company. At both September 30, 2017March 31, 2019 and December 31, 2016,2018, the Company had $1$1.2 million of reserves in accrued expenses and other liabilities on the Company’s Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets related to potential losses from loans sold.
Loss Sharing Agreement
In connection with the Guaranty Bank acquisition, the Bank entered into loss sharing agreements with the FDIC. In accordance with the terms of the loss sharing agreements, the FDIC’s obligation to reimburse the Bank for losses with respect to the acquired loans and acquired OREO begins with the first dollar of incurred losses, as defined in the loss sharing agreements. The loss sharing agreements provide for FDIC loss sharing for five years for commercial loans and 10 years for single family residential loans. The loss sharing agreement for commercial loans expired in the fourth quarter of 2014.
On July 12, 2017, the Company entered into an agreement with the FDIC to terminate the Company's loss share agreement ahead of the contractual maturity. Under the terms of the agreement, the Company made a net payment of $132 million to the FDIC in July as consideration for early termination of the shared-loss agreement and settlement of the FDIC indemnification liability. The termination resulted in a $1.8 million gain for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 which was recorded in other noninterest income in the Company's Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income.
Legal and Regulatory Proceedings
In the ordinary course of business, the Company is subject to legal proceedings, including claims, litigation, investigations and administrative proceedings, all of which are considered incidental to the normal conduct of business. The Company believes it has substantial defenses to the claims asserted against it in its currently outstanding legal proceedings and, with respect to such legal proceedings, intends to defend itself vigorously. Set forth below are descriptions of certain of the Company’s legal proceedings.


In June 2013, Compass Bank (“BBVA Compass”) was named as a defendant in a lawsuit filed in the United States District Court of the Northern District of Alabama, Intellectual Ventures II, LLC v. BBVA Compass Bancshares, Inc. and BBVA Compass, wherein the plaintiff alleges that BBVA Compass is infringing five patents owned by the plaintiff and related to the security infrastructure for BBVA Compass’ online banking services. The plaintiff seeks unspecified monetary relief. The Company believes there are substantial defenses to these claims and intends to defend them vigorously.

In January 2014, BBVA Compassthe Bank was named as a defendant in a lawsuit filed in the District Court of Dallas County, Texas, David Bagwell, individually and as Trustee of the David S. Bagwell Trust, et al. v. BBVA Compass, et al., wherein the plaintiff allegesplaintiffs (who are the borrowers and guarantors of the underlying loans) allege that BBVA Compass wrongfully sold his loantheir loans to a third party after representing that it would not do so. The plaintiff seeksplaintiffs seek unspecified monetary relief. Following trial in December 2017, the jury rendered a verdict in favor of the plaintiffs totaling $98 million. On June 27, 2018, the court entered a judgment in favor of the plaintiffs in the amount of $96 million, which includes prejudgment interest. The Bank has appealed and will vigorously contest the judgment on appeal. The Company believes there are substantial defenses to these claims and intends to defend them vigorously.

In March 2015, the Bank was named as a defendant in a lawsuit filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas, Lomix Limited Partnership, et al. v. BBVA Compass, wherein the plaintiffs (who are the borrower and guarantors of the underlying loan) allege that the Bank wrongfully sold their loan to a third party, and wrongfully disclosed the guarantors’ personal financial information in connection with the sale of the loan. The plaintiffs seek unspecified monetary relief. On February 28, 2019, the Court granted partial summary judgment in favor of BBVA Compass, leaving only a nominal claim for damages. The plaintiffs disclaimed nominal damages and the Court entered a final judgment in favor of BBVA Compass.  Plaintiffs filed a notice of appeal with the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals on April 5, 2019. The Company believes there are substantial defenses to these claims and intends to defend them vigorously.

In January 2016, BSI was named as a defendant in a putative class action lawsuit filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas, In re Plains All American Pipeline, L.P. Securities Litigation, wherein the plaintiffs challenge statements made in registration materials and prospectuses filed with the Securities and Exchange CommissionSEC in connection with eight securities offerings of stock and notes issued by Plains GP Holdings and Plains All American Pipeline and underwritten by BSI, among others. The plaintiffs seek unspecified monetary relief. The Company believes there are substantial defensesOn April 2, 2018, the court granted the defendants' motion to these claims and intends to defend them vigorously.

In March 2016, BBVA Compass was named as a defendant in a lawsuit filed in the United States District Court of the Southern District of Texas, Lomix Limited Partnership, et al. v. BBVA Compass, wherein the plaintiffs (who are the borrower and guarantors of the underlying loan) allege that BBVA Compass wrongfully disclosed the guarantors’ personal financial information in connectiondismiss with the sale of the loan to a third party.prejudice. The plaintiffs seek unspecified monetary relief.have appealed. The Company believes there are substantial defenses to these claims and intends to defend them vigorously.

In October 2016, BSI was named as a defendant in a putative class action lawsuit filed in the District Court of Harris County, Texas, and subsequently removed to the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas, St. Lucie County Fire District Firefighters' Pension Trust, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. Southwestern Energy Company, et al., wherein the plaintiffs allege that Southwestern Energy Company, its officers and directors, and the underwriting defendants (including BSI) made inaccurate and misleading statements in the registration statement and prospectus related to a securities offering. The plaintiffs seek unspecified monetary relief. The Company believes there are substantial defenses to these claims and intends to defend them vigorously.

In December 2016, BBVA Compass was named as a defendant in an adversary proceeding filed in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York, In re: SunEdison, Inc., et al. // Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors v. BBVA Compass, et al., wherein the plaintiffs allege that the first-lien lenders (including BBVA Compass) exercised undue influence and control over SunEdison’s bankruptcy, that SunEdison improperly incurred secured debt through second-lien secured notes to the detriment of SunEdison’s unsecured creditors shortly before SunEdison filed its bankruptcy petition, and that the second-lien notes constitute avoidable fraudulent transfers under the Bankruptcy Code. The plaintiffs seek unspecified monetary relief. The parties reached a settlement that was approved by the Bankruptcy Court on July 25, 2017. The settlement will be fully consummated on or before November 15, 2017.

In December 2016, BBVA CompassBank was named as a defendant in a putative class action lawsuit filed in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama, Robert Hossfeld, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. BBVA Compass Bancshares, Inc. and MSR Group, LLC, alleging violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act in the context of customer satisfaction survey calls to the cell phones of individuals who have not given, or who have withdrawn, consent to receive calls on their cell phones. The plaintiffs seek unspecified monetary relief. The parties reached a settlement in principle on November 6, 2018, and the Court has entered a Preliminary approval of Settlement Order. The claims process is ongoing.

The Company and the Bank have been named in two proceedings involving David L. Powell: one that was filed in January 2017 with the Federal Conciliation and Arbitration Labor Board of Mexico City, Mexico, David Lannon Powell Finneran v. BBVA Compass Bancshares, Inc., et al., and one that was filed in April 2018 in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas, David L. Powell, et al. v. BBVA Compass. Powell alleges discrimination and wrongful termination in both proceedings, and seeks unspecified monetary relief. The Company believes there are substantial defenses to these claims and intends to defend them vigorously.


In AugustNovember 2017, BSIthe Banks was named as a defendant in a putative class action lawsuit filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Connecticut,New York and subsequently transferred to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas, Ontario Teachers’ Pension Plan Board, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situatedStabilis Fund II, LLC v. Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd., et al.BBVA Compass, whereinalleging that the plaintiffs allegeBank fraudulently induced the plaintiff to purchase a loan that Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. (“Teva”), its officers and directors, andsubsequently became the underwriting defendants (including BSI) made inaccurate and misleading statements in the offering materials related to Teva’s role in an alleged conspiracy to inflate the market pricessubject of certain generic drug products.litigation. The plaintiffs seekplaintiff seeks unspecified monetary relief. The Company believes there are substantial defenses to these claims and intends to defend them vigorously.

In August 2017, BBVA Compass wasMarch 2018, the Company and BSI were named as a defendantdefendants in a lawsuit filed in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas, United States of America ex rel. Edward Hendrickson v. BBVA Compass, et al., alleging that the defendant banks, including BBVA Compass, violated the federal False Claims Act by accepting federal agency benefit payments into the accounts of deceased customers. Hendrickson seeks unspecified monetary relief on behalf of the United States government. The Company believes there are substantial defenses to these claims and intends to defend them vigorously.

In September 2017, BBVA Compass was named as a defendant in putative class action lawsuit filed in the United States District Court for the NorthernSouthern District of Illinois,New York, Lara Bellissimo, individually and on behalf of similarly situated individuals v. BBVA CompassIn re Mexican Government Bonds Antitrust Litigation, , alleging violations ofthat the Telephone Consumer Protection Actdefendant financial institutions engaged in the context of callscollusion with respect to the cell phonespurchase and sale of individuals whoMexican government bonds. Five substantially similar lawsuits were notfiled and consolidated with the individuals that provided the phone numbers to BBVA Compass.original lawsuit. The plaintiffs seek injunctive and unspecified monetary relief. The Company believes there are substantial defenses to these claims and intends to defend them vigorously.

In March 2019, the Company and its subsidiary, Simple Finance Technology Corp., were named as defendants in a putative class action lawsuit filed in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, Amitahbo Chattopadhyay v. BBVA Compass Bancshares, Inc., et al. Plaintiff claims that Simple and the Company only permit United States citizens to open Simple accounts (which are exclusively originated through online channels). Plaintiff alleges that this constitutes alienage discrimination and violations of California's Unruh Act. The Company (including its subsidiaries)believes that there are substantial defenses to these claims and intends to defend them vigorously.

The Company is or may become involved from time to time in information-gathering requests, reviews, investigations and proceedings (both formal and informal) by various governmental regulatory agencies, law enforcement authorities and self-regulatory bodies regarding the Company’s business. Such matters may result in material adverse consequences, including without limitation adverse judgments, settlements, fines, penalties, orders, injunctions, alterations in the Company’s business practices or other actions, and could result in additional expenses and collateral costs, including reputational damage, which could have a material adverse impact on the Company’s business, consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
The Company assesses its liabilities and contingencies in connection with outstanding legal proceedings utilizing the latest information available. Where it is probable that the Company will incur a loss and the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated, the Company records a liability in its consolidated financial statements. These legal reserves may be increased or decreased to reflect any relevant developments. Where a loss is not probable or the amount of a probable loss is not reasonably estimable, the Company does not accrue legal reserves. At September 30, 2017,March 31, 2019, the Company had accrued legal reserves in the amount of $2$24 million. Additionally, for those matters where a loss is reasonably possible and the amount of loss is reasonably estimable, the Company estimates the amount of losses that it could incur beyond the accrued legal reserves. Under U.S. GAAP, an event is “reasonably possible” if “the chance of the future event or events occurring is more than remote but less than likely” and an event is “remote“remote" if “the chance of the future event or events occurring is slight.” At September 30, 2017, there were no suchFor a limited number of legal matters wherein which the Company is involved, the Company is able to estimate a loss was reasonably possible and reasonably estimable, creatingrange of reasonably possible losses beyondin excess of related reserves, if any. Management currently estimates these losses to range from $0 to approximately $87 million. This estimated range of reasonably possible losses is based on information available at March 31, 2019. The matters underlying the accrued legal reserves.estimated range will change from time to time, and the actual results may vary significantly from this estimate. Those matters for which an estimate is not possible are not included within this estimated range; therefore, this estimated range does not represent the Company’s maximum loss exposure.
While the outcome of legal proceedings and the timing of the ultimate resolution are inherently difficult to predict, based on information currently available, advice of counsel and available insurance coverage, the Company believes that it has established adequate legal reserves. Further, based upon available information, the Company is of the opinion that these legal proceedings, individually or in the aggregate, will not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition or results of operations. However, in the event of unexpected future developments, it is possible that the ultimate resolution of those matters, if unfavorable, may be material to the Company’s results of operations for any particular period, depending, in part, upon the size of the loss or liability imposed and the operating results for the applicable period.

Income Tax Review
The Company is subject to review and examination from various tax authorities. The Company is currently under examination by a number of states, and has received notices of proposed adjustments related to state income taxes due for prior years. Management believes that adequate provisions for income taxes have been recorded.

(8)(9) Fair Value of Financial InstrumentsMeasurements
The Company applies the fair value accounting guidance required under ASC Topic 820 which establishes a framework for measuring fair value. This guidance defines fair value as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liabilitySee Note 19, Fair Value Measurements, in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. This guidance also establishes a fair value hierarchy which requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. A financial instrument’s categorization within this fair value hierarchy is based upon the lowest level of input that is significantNotes to the instrument’s fair value measurement. The three levels within the fair value hierarchy are described as follows.
Level 1 – Fair value is based on quoted prices in an active marketDecember 31, 2018, Consolidated Financial Statements for identical assets or liabilities.
Level 2 – Fair value is based on quoted market prices for similar instruments traded in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active and model-based valuation techniques for which all significant assumptions are observable in the market.
Level 3 – Fair value is based on unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities. Level 3 assets and liabilities would include financial instruments whose value is determined using pricing models, discounted cash flow methodologies, or similar pricing techniques based on the Company’s own assumptions about what market participants would use to price the asset or liability.
A description of the valuation methodologies used for instruments measured at fair value, as well as the general classification of such instruments under the fair value hierarchy, is set forth below. These valuation methodologies were applied to the Company’s financial assets and financial liabilities carried at fair value. In general, fair value is based upon quoted market prices, where available. If such quoted market prices are not available, fair value is based upon internally developed models that primarily use observable market based parameters as inputs. Valuation adjustments may be made to ensure that financial instruments are recorded at fair value. These adjustments may include amounts to reflect counterparty credit quality and the Company’s creditworthiness, among other things, as well as other unobservable parameters. Any such valuation adjustments are applied consistently over time. While management believes the Company’s valuation methodologies are appropriate and consistent with other market participants, the use of different methodologies or assumptions to determine the fair value of certain financial instruments could result in a different estimate of fair value at the reporting date. The Company’s valuation methodologies may produce a fair value calculation that may not be indicative of net realizable value or reflective of future fair values. Furthermore, the reported fair value amounts have not been comprehensively revalued since the presentation dates, and, therefore, estimates of fair value after the balance sheet date may differ significantly from the amounts presented herein.
Financial Instruments Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis
Trading account assets and liabilities, securities available for sale, certain mortgage loans held for sale, derivative assets and liabilities, and mortgage servicing rights are recorded at fair value on a recurring basis. The following is a description of the valuation methodologies for these assets and liabilities.
Trading account assets and liabilities and investment securities available for sale – Trading account assets and liabilities and investment securities available for sale consist of U.S. Treasury securities and other U.S. government agency securities, mortgage-backed securities, collateralized mortgage obligations, debt obligations of state and political subdivisions, other debt and equity securities, and derivative contracts.
U.S. Treasury securities and other U.S. government agency securities are valued based on quoted market prices of identical assets on active exchanges (Level 1 measurements) or are valued based on a market approach

using observable inputs such as benchmark yields, reported trades, broker/dealer quotes, benchmark securities, and bids/offers of government-sponsored enterprise securities (Level 2 measurements).
Mortgage-backed securities are primarily valued using market-based pricing matrices that are based on observable inputs including benchmark To Be Announced security prices, U.S. Treasury yields, U.S. dollar swap yields, and benchmark floating-rate indices. Mortgage-backed securities pricing may also give consideration to pool-specific data such as prepayment history and collateral characteristics. Valuations for mortgage-backed securities are therefore classified as Level 2 measurements.
Collateralized mortgage obligations are valued using market-based pricing matrices that are based on observable inputs including reported trades, bids, offers, dealer quotes, U.S. Treasury yields, U.S. dollar swap yields, market convention prepayment speeds, tranche-specific characteristics, prepayment history, and collateral characteristics. Fair value measurements for collateralized mortgage obligations are classified as Level 2.
Debt obligations of states and political subdivisions are primarily valued using market-based pricing matrices that are based on observable inputs including Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board reported trades, issuer spreads, material event notices, and benchmark yield curves. These valuations are Level 2 measurements.
Other debt and equity securities consist of mutual funds, foreign and corporate debt, and U.S. government agency equity securities. Mutual funds are valued based on quoted market prices of identical assets trading on active exchanges. These valuations are Level 1 measurements. Foreign and corporate debt valuations are based on information and assumptions that are observable in the market place. The valuations for these securities are therefore classified as Level 2. U.S. government agency equity securities are valued based on quoted market prices of identical assets trading on active exchanges. These valuations thus qualify as Level 1 measurements.
Other derivative assets and liabilities consist primarily of interest rate and commodity contracts. The Company’s interest rate contracts are valued utilizing Level 2 observable inputs (yield curves and volatilities) to determine a current market price for each interest rate contract. Commodity contracts are priced using raw market data, primarily in the form of quotes for fixed and basis swaps with monthly, quarterly, seasonal or calendar-year terms. Proprietary models provided by a third party are used to generate forward curves and volatility surfaces. As a result of the valuation process and observable inputs used, commodity contracts are classified as Level 2 measurements.
Other trading assets primarily consist of interest-only strips which are valued by an independent third-party. The independent third-party values the assets on a loan-by-loan basis using a discounted cash flow analysis that employs prepayment assumptions, discount rate assumptions, and default curves. The prepayment assumptions are created from actual SBA pool prepayment history. The discount rates are derived from actual SBA loan secondary market transactions. The default curves are created using historical observable and unobservable inputs. As such, interest-only strips are classified as Level 3 measurements. The Company’s SBA department is responsible for ensuring the appropriate application of the valuation, capitalization, and amortization policies of the Company’s interest-only strips. The department performs independent, internal valuations of the interest-only strips on a quarterly basis, which are then reconciled to the third-party valuations to ensure their validity.
Loans held for sale – The Company has elected to apply the fair value option for single family real estate mortgage loans originated for resale in the secondary market. The election allows for a more effective offset of the changes in fair values of the loans and the derivative instruments used to economically hedge them without the burden of complying with the requirements for hedge accounting. The Company has not elected the fair value option for other loans held for sale primarily because they are not economically hedged using derivative instruments.
The fair value of loans held for sale is based on what secondary markets are currently offering for portfolios with similar characteristics. The changes in fair value of these assets are largely driven by changes in interest rates subsequent to loan funding and changes in the fair value of servicing associated with the mortgage loan held for sale. Both the mortgage loans held for sale and the related forward contracts are classified as Level 2.

At both September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, no loans held for sale for which the fair value option was elected were 90 days or more past due or were in nonaccrual. Interest income on mortgage loans held for sale is recognized based on contractual rates and is reflected in interest and fees on loans in the Company's Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income. Net gains or (losses) of $98 thousand and $(478) thousand resulting from changes in fair value of these loans were recorded in noninterest income during the three months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively. Net gains of $1.2 million and $2.1 million resulting from changes in fair value of these loans were recorded in noninterest income during the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively.
The Company also had fair value changes on forward contracts related to residential mortgage loans held for sale of approximately $(46) thousand and $1.1 million for the three months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively. The Company also had fair value changes on forward contracts related to residential mortgage loans held for sale of approximately $(2.0) million for both the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016. An immaterial portion of these amounts was attributable to changes in instrument-specific credit risk.
The following table summarizes the difference between the aggregate fair value and the aggregate unpaid principal balance for residential mortgage loans measured at fair value.
 Aggregate Fair Value Aggregate Unpaid Principal Balance Difference
 (In Thousands)
September 30, 2017     
Residential mortgage loans held for sale$77,783
 $75,192
 $2,591
December 31, 2016     
Residential mortgage loans held for sale$105,257
 $103,886
 $1,371
Derivative assets and liabilities – Derivative assets and liabilities are measured using models that primarily use market observable inputs, such as quoted security prices, and are accordingly classified as Level 2. The derivative assets and liabilities classified within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy were comprised of interest rate lock commitments that are valued using third-party software that calculates fair market value considering current quoted TBA and other market based prices and then applies closing ratio assumptions based on software-produced pull through ratios that are generated using the Company’s historical fallout activity. Based upon this process, the fair value measurement obtained for these financial instruments is deemed a Level 3 classification. The Company's Secondary Marketing Committee is responsible for the appropriate application of the valuation policies and procedures surrounding the Company’s interest rate lock commitments. Policies established to govern mortgage pipeline risk management activities must be approved by the Company’s Asset Liability Committee on an annual basis.
Other assets - MSR – A component of other assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis and classified within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy are MSRs that are valued through a discounted cash flow analysis using a third-party commercial valuation system. The MSR valuation takes into consideration the objective characteristics of the MSR portfolio, such as loan amount, note rate, service fee, loan term, and common industry assumptions, such as servicing costs, ancillary income, prepayment estimates, earning rates, cost of fund rates, option-adjusted spreads, etc. The Company’s portfolio-specific factors are also considered in calculating the fair value of MSRs to the extent one can reasonably assume a buyer would also incorporate these factors. Examples of such factors are geographical concentrations of the portfolio, liquidity consideration, or additional views of risk not inherently accounted for in prepayment assumptions. Product liquidity and these other risks are generally incorporated through adjustment of discount factors applied to forecasted cash flows. Based on this method of pricing MSRs, the fair value measurement obtained for these financial instruments is deemed a Level 3 classification. The value of the MSR is calculated by a third-party firm that specializes in the MSR market and valuation services. Additionally, the Company obtains a valuation from an independent party to compare for reasonableness. The Company’s Secondary Marketing Committee is responsible for ensuring the appropriate application of valuation, capitalization, and fair value decay policies for the MSR portfolio. The Committee meets at least monthly to review the MSR portfolio.
Other assets - SBIC – A component of other assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis and classified within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy are SBIC investments initially valued based on transaction price. The SBIC investments are valued initially based upon transaction price. Valuation factors such as recent or proposed purchase or sale of debt or equity of the issuer, pricing by other dealers in similar securities, size of position held, liquidity of the

market, and changes in economic conditions affecting the issuer, are used in the determination of estimated fair value. These SBIC investments are classified as Level 3 within the valuation hierarchy.

non-recurring basis.
The following tables summarize the financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis.
  Fair Value Measurements at the End of the Reporting Period Using  Fair Value Measurements at the End of the Reporting Period Using
Fair Value Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets Significant Other Observable Inputs Significant Unobservable InputsFair Value Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets Significant Other Observable Inputs Significant Unobservable Inputs
September 30, 2017 (Level 1) (Level 2) (Level 3)March 31, 2019 (Level 1) (Level 2) (Level 3)
(In Thousands)(In Thousands)
Recurring fair value measurements              
Assets:              
Trading account assets:              
U.S. Treasury and other U.S. government agencies$330,919
 $330,919
 $
 $
$76,277
 $76,277
 $
 $
State and political subdivisions297
 
 297
 
Other debt securities68
 
 68
 
Interest rate contracts224,561
 
 224,561
 
210,707
 
 210,707
 
Foreign exchange contracts15,696
 
 15,696
 
19,139
 
 19,139
 
Other trading assets563
 
 
 563
Total trading account assets572,104
 330,919
 240,622
 563
306,123
 76,277
 229,846
 
Investment securities available for sale:       
Debt securities available for sale:       
U.S. Treasury and other U.S. government agencies3,679,690
 2,669,033
 1,010,657
 
4,173,660
 3,529,039
 644,621
 
Mortgage-backed securities3,038,317
 
 3,038,317
 
1,845,201
 
 1,845,201
 
Collateralized mortgage obligations5,100,041
 
 5,100,041
 
3,277,275
 
 3,277,275
 
States and political subdivisions2,394
 
 2,394
 
882
 
 882
 
Other debt securities17,748
 17,748
 
 
Equity securities (1)440
 89
 
 351
Total investment securities available for sale11,838,630
 2,686,870
 9,151,409
 351
Total debt securities available for sale9,297,018
 3,529,039
 5,767,979
 
Loans held for sale77,783
 
 77,783
 
76,938
 
 76,938
 
Derivative assets:              
Interest rate contracts27,522
 77
 24,521
 2,924
15,923
 456
 12,309
 3,158
Equity contracts42,415
 
 42,415
 
13,168
 
 13,168
 
Foreign exchange contracts2,617
 
 2,617
 
3,053
 
 3,053
 
Total derivative assets72,554
 77
 69,553
 2,924
32,144
 456
 28,530
 3,158
Other assets - MSR48,550
 
 
 48,550
Other assets - SBIC32,745
 
 
 32,745
Other assets:       
Equity securities15,705
 15,705
 
 
MSR47,545
 
 
 47,545
SBIC93,343
 
 
 93,343
Liabilities:              
Trading account liabilities:              
U.S. Treasury and other U.S. government agencies$327,539
 $327,539
 $
 $
$30,975
 $30,975
 $
 $
Interest rate contracts174,414
 
 174,414
 
101,105
 
 101,105
 
Foreign exchange contracts13,851
 
 13,851
 
16,865
 
 16,865
 
Total trading account liabilities515,804
 327,539
 188,265
 
148,945
 30,975
 117,970
 
Derivative liabilities:              
Interest rate contracts44,651
 
 44,650
 1
26,837
 
 26,837
 
Equity contracts38,351
 
 38,351
 
11,438
 
 11,438
 
Foreign exchange contracts1,874
 
 1,874
 
674
 
 674
 
Total derivative liabilities84,876
 
 84,875
 1
38,949
 
 38,949
 
(1)Excludes $430 million of FHLB and Federal Reserve stock required to be owned by the Company at September 30, 2017. These securities are carried at par.


  Fair Value Measurements at the End of the Reporting Period Using  Fair Value Measurements at the End of the Reporting Period Using
Fair Value Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets Significant Other Observable Inputs Significant Unobservable InputsFair Value Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets Significant Other Observable Inputs Significant Unobservable Inputs
December 31, 2016 (Level 1) (Level 2) (Level 3)December 31, 2018 (Level 1) (Level 2) (Level 3)
(In Thousands)(In Thousands)
Recurring fair value measurements              
Assets:              
Trading account assets:              
U.S. Treasury and other U.S. government agencies$2,820,797
 $2,820,797
 $
 $
$68,922
 $68,922
 $
 $
State and political subdivisions219
 
 219
 
Other debt securities4,120
 
 4,120
 
Interest rate contracts290,238
 
 290,238
 
149,269
 
 149,269
 
Foreign exchange contracts28,367
 
 28,367
 
19,465
 
 19,465
 
Other trading assets859
 
 
 859
Total trading account assets3,144,600
 2,820,797
 322,944
 859
237,656
 68,922
 168,734
 
Investment securities available for sale:       
Debt securities available for sale:       
U.S. Treasury and other U.S. government agencies2,374,331
 1,266,564
 1,107,767
 
5,431,467
 4,746,335
 685,132
 
Mortgage-backed securities3,763,338
 
 3,763,338
 
2,129,821
 
 2,129,821
 
Collateralized mortgage obligations5,098,928
 
 5,098,928
 
3,418,979
 
 3,418,979
 
States and political subdivisions8,641
 
 8,641
 
949
 
 949
 
Other debt securities16,185
 16,185
 
 
Equity securities (1)380
 87
 
 293
Total investment securities available for sale11,261,803
 1,282,836
 9,978,674
 293
Total debt securities available for sale10,981,216
 4,746,335
 6,234,881
 
Loans held for sale105,257
 
 105,257
 
68,766
 
 68,766
 
Derivative assets:              
Interest rate contracts46,133
 
 43,709
 2,424
18,045
 
 16,033
 2,012
Equity contracts57,198
 
 57,198
 
14,185
 
 14,185
 
Foreign exchange contracts3,875
 
 3,875
 
1,763
 
 1,763
 
Total derivative assets107,206
 
 104,782
 2,424
33,993
 
 31,981
 2,012
Other assets - MSR51,428
 
 
 51,428
Other assets - SBIC15,639
 
 
 15,639
Other assets:       
Equity securities17,839
 17,839
 
 
MSR51,539
 
 
 51,539
SBIC80,074
 
 
 80,074
Liabilities:              
Trading account liabilities:              
U.S. Treasury and other U.S. government agencies$2,750,085
 $2,750,085
 $
 $
Other debt securities2,892
 
 2,892
 
Interest rate contracts228,748
 
 228,748
 
$130,704
 $
 $130,704
 $
Foreign exchange contracts26,317
 
 26,317
 
17,341
 
 17,341
 
Total trading account liabilities3,008,042
 2,750,085
 257,957
 
148,045
 
 148,045
 
Derivative liabilities:              
Interest rate contracts33,414
 
 33,382
 32
31,438
 
 31,438
 
Equity contracts53,044
 
 53,044
 
12,434
 
 12,434
 
Foreign exchange contracts2,103
 
 2,103
 
1,111
 
 1,111
 
Total derivative liabilities88,561
 
 88,529
 32
44,983
 
 44,983
 
(1)Excludes $403 million of FHLB and Federal Reserve stock required to be owned by the Company at December 31, 2016. These securities are carried at par.


There were no transfers between Levels 1 or 2 of the fair value hierarchy for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017March 31, 2019 and 2016.2018. It is the Company’s policy to value any transfers between levels of the fair value hierarchy based on end of period fair values.
The following table reconciles the assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3).
Fair Value Measurements Using Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)Fair Value Measurements Using Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
Three Months Ended September 30,Other Trading Assets Equity Securities Interest Rate Contracts, net Other Assets - MSR Other Assets - SBIC
Three Months Ended March 31,Interest Rate Contracts, net Other Assets - MSR Other Assets - SBIC
(In Thousands)  (In Thousands)
Balance, June 30, 2016$1,031
 $294
 $4,691
 $36,496
 $
Balance, December 31, 2017$2,416
 $49,597
 $45,042
Transfers into Level 3
 
 
 
 

 
 
Transfers out of Level 3
 
 
 
 

 
 
Total gains or losses (realized/unrealized):              
Included in earnings (1)(47) 
 (162) 598
 
192
 1,885
 
Included in other comprehensive income
 
 
 
 

 
 
Purchases, issuances, sales and settlements:              
Purchases
 
 
 
 

 
 2,945
Issuances
 
 
 1,933
 

 1,543
 
Sales
 (1) 
 
 

 
 
Settlements
 
 
 
 

 
 
Balance, September 30, 2016$984
 $293
 $4,529
 $39,027
 $
Change in unrealized gains (losses) included in earnings for the period, attributable to assets and liabilities still held at September 30, 2016$(47) $
 $(162) $598
 $
Balance, March 31, 2018$2,608
 $53,025
 $47,987
Change in unrealized gains (losses) included in earnings for the period, attributable to assets and liabilities still held at March 31, 2018$192
 $1,885
 $
              
Balance, June 30, 2017$778
 $353
 $3,185
 $49,398
 $22,572
Balance, December 31, 2018$2,012
 $51,539
 $80,074
Transfers into Level 3
 
 
 
 

 
 
Transfers out of Level 3
 
 
 
 

 
 
Total gains or losses (realized/unrealized):              
Included in earnings (1)(215) 
 (262) (2,577) 
1,146
 (5,053) 7,557
Included in other comprehensive income
 
 
 
 

 
 
Purchases, issuances, sales and settlements:              
Purchases
 
 
 
 10,173

 
 5,712
Issuances
 
 
 1,729
 

 1,059
 
Sales
 (2) 
 
 

 
 
Settlements
 
 
 
 

 
 
Balance, September 30, 2017$563
 $351
 $2,923
 $48,550
 $32,745
Change in unrealized gains (losses) included in earnings for the period, attributable to assets and liabilities still held at September 30, 2017$(215) $
 $(262) $(2,577) $
Balance, March 31, 2019$3,158
 $47,545
 $93,343
Change in unrealized gains (losses) included in earnings for the period, attributable to assets and liabilities still held at March 31, 2019$1,146
 $(5,053) $7,557
(1)Included in noninterest income in the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income.

 Fair Value Measurements Using Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
Nine Months Ended September 30,Other Trading Assets Equity Securities Interest Rate Contracts, net Other Assets - MSR Other Assets - SBIC
 (In Thousands)  
Balance, December 31, 2015$1,117
 $253
 $2,874
 $44,541
 $
Transfers into Level 3
 
 
 
 
Transfers out of Level 3
 
 
 
 
Total gains or losses (realized/unrealized):         
Included in earnings (1)(133) 
 1,655
 (13,097) 
Included in other comprehensive income
 
 
 
 
Purchases, issuances, sales and settlements:         
Purchases
 41
 
 
 
Issuances
 
 
 7,583
 
Sales
 (1) 
 
 
Settlements
 
 
 
 
Balance, September 30, 2016$984
 $293
 $4,529
 $39,027
 $
Change in unrealized gains (losses) included in earnings for the period, attributable to assets and liabilities still held at September 30, 2016$(133) $
 $1,655
 $(13,097) $
          
Balance, December 31, 2016$859
 $293
 $2,392
 $51,428
 $15,639
Transfers into Level 3
 
 
 
 
Transfers out of Level 3
 
 
 
 
Total gains or losses (realized/unrealized):         
Included in earnings (1)(296) 
 531
 (8,206) 550
Included in other comprehensive income
 
 
 
 
Purchases, issuances, sales and settlements:         
Purchases
 60
 
 
 16,556
Issuances
 
 
 5,328
 
Sales
 (2) 
 
 
Settlements
 
 
 
 
Balance, September 30, 2017$563
 $351
 $2,923
 $48,550
 $32,745
Change in unrealized gains (losses) included in earnings for the period, attributable to assets and liabilities still held at September 30, 2017$(296) $
 $531
 $(8,206) $550
(1)Included in noninterest income in the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income.


Assets Measured at Fair Value on a Nonrecurring Basis
Periodically, certain assets may be recorded at fair value on a non-recurring basis. These adjustments to fair value usually result from the application of lower of cost or fair value accounting or write-downs of individual assets due to impairment. The following tables represent those assets that were subject to fair value adjustments during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017March 31, 2019 and 2016,2018, and still held as of the end of the period, and the related gains and losses from fair value adjustments on assets sold during the period as well as assets still held as of the end of the period.
  Fair Value Measurements at the End of the Reporting Period Using      Fair Value Measurements at the End of the Reporting Period Using  
Fair Value Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets Significant Other Observable Inputs Significant Unobservable Inputs Total Gains (Losses)Fair Value Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets Significant Other Observable Inputs Significant Unobservable Inputs Total Gains (Losses)
September 30, 2017 (Level 1) (Level 2) (Level 3) Three Months Ended September 30, 2017 Nine Months Ended September 30, 2017March 31, 2019 (Level 1) (Level 2) (Level 3) Three Months Ended March 31, 2019
(In Thousands)(In Thousands)
Nonrecurring fair value measurementsNonrecurring fair value measurements        Nonrecurring fair value measurements      
Assets:                    
Investment securities held to maturity$1,863
 $
 $
 $1,863
 $
 $(242)
Impaired loans (1)44,434
 
 
 44,434
 (12,389) (49,894)
OREO22,012
 
 
 22,012
 (1,845) (4,640)$14,983
 $
 $
 $14,983
 $(1,973)
                    
  Fair Value Measurements at the End of the Reporting Period Using      Fair Value Measurements at the End of the Reporting Period Using  
Fair Value Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets Significant Other Observable Inputs Significant Unobservable Inputs Total Gains (Losses)Fair Value Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets Significant Other Observable Inputs Significant Unobservable Inputs Total Gains (Losses)
September 30, 2016 (Level 1) (Level 2) (Level 3) Three Months Ended September 30, 2016 Nine Months Ended September 30, 2016March 31, 2018 (Level 1) (Level 2) (Level 3) Three Months Ended March 31, 2018
(In Thousands)(In Thousands)
Nonrecurring fair value measurementsNonrecurring fair value measurements        Nonrecurring fair value measurements      
Assets:                    
Investment securities held to maturity$2,595
 $
 $
 $2,595
 $
 $(130)
Debt securities held to maturity$2,260
 $
 $
 $2,260
 $(309)
Impaired loans (1)71,806
 
 
 71,806
 (9,202) (55,922)7,251
 
 
 7,251
 (4,559)
OREO21,670
 
 
 21,670
 (458) (2,777)16,147
 
 
 16,147
 (527)
(1)
Total gains (losses) represent charge-offs on impaired loans for which adjustments are based on the appraised value of the collateral.
The following is a description of the methodologies applied for valuing these assets:
InvestmentDebt securities held to maturity – Nonrecurring fair value adjustments on investmentdebt securities held to maturity reflect impairment write-downs which the Company believes are other than temporary. For analyzing these securities, the Company has retained a third-party valuation firm. Impairment is determined through the use of cash flow models that estimate cash flows on the underlying mortgages using security-specific collateral and the transaction structure. The cash flow models incorporate the remaining cash flows which are adjusted for future expected credit losses. Future expected credit losses are determined by using various assumptions such as current default rates, prepayment rates, and loss severities. The Company develops these assumptions through the use of market data published by third-party sources in addition to historical analysis which includes actual delinquency and default information through the current period. The expected cash flows are then discounted at the interest rate used to recognize interest income on the security to arrive at a present value amount. As the fair value assessments are derived using a discounted cash flow modeling approach, the nonrecurring fair value adjustments are classified as Level 3.



Impaired Loans – Impaired loans measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis represent the carrying value of impaired loans for which adjustments are based on the appraised value of the collateral. Nonrecurring fair value adjustments to impaired loans reflect full or partial write-downs that are generally based on the fair value of the underlying collateral supporting the loan. Loans subjected to nonrecurring fair value adjustments based on the current estimated fair value of the collateral are classified as Level 3.
OREO – OREO is recorded on the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets at the lower of recorded balance or fair value, which is based on appraisals and third-party price opinions, less estimated costs to sell. The fair value is classified as Level 3.
The tabletables below presents quantitative information about the significant unobservable inputs for material assets and liabilities measured at fair value using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) on a recurring and nonrecurring basis.
  Quantitative Information about Level 3 Fair Value Measurements  Quantitative Information about Level 3 Fair Value Measurements
Fair Value at Range of Unobservable InputsFair Value at Range of Unobservable Inputs
September 30, 2017 Valuation Technique Unobservable Input(s)  (Weighted Average)March 31, 2019 Valuation Technique Unobservable Input(s) (Weighted Average)
(In Thousands) (In Thousands) 
Recurring fair value measurements:Recurring fair value measurements: Recurring fair value measurements: 
Other trading assets$563
 Discounted cash flow Default rate 10.2%
  Prepayment rate 5.8% - 11.0% (8.0%)
Interest rate contracts, net2,923
 Discounted cash flow Closing ratios (pull-through) 20.5% - 99.5% (70.7%)$3,158
 Discounted cash flow Closing ratios (pull-through) 21.8% - 99.9% (66.5%)
  Cap grids 0.5% - 2.2% (0.9%)  Cap grids 0.5% - 3.2% (1.1%)
Other assets - MSRs48,550
 Discounted cash flow Option adjusted spread 4.6% - 17.2% (8.2%)47,545
 Discounted cash flow Option adjusted spread 6.3% - 8.5% (6.5%)
  Constant prepayment rate or life speed 1.2% - 51.9% (9.4%)  Constant prepayment rate or life speed 0.0% - 60.0% (10.5%)
  Cost to service $65 - $4,000 ($80)  Cost to service $65 - $4,000 ($86)
Other assets - SBIC investments32,745
 Transaction price Transaction price N/A93,343
 Transaction price Transaction price N/A
Nonrecurring fair value measurements:Nonrecurring fair value measurements: Nonrecurring fair value measurements: 
Investment securities held to maturity$1,863
 Discounted cash flow Prepayment rate 5.1%
  Default rate 4.8%
  Loss severity 70.6%
Impaired loans44,434
 Appraised value Appraised value 0.0% - 100.0% (29.0%)
OREO22,012
 Appraised value Appraised value 8.0% (1)$14,983
 Appraised value Appraised value 8.0% (1)
(1)Represents discount to appraised value for estimated costs to sell.


  Quantitative Information about Level 3 Fair Value Measurements  Quantitative Information about Level 3 Fair Value Measurements
Fair Value at Range of Unobservable InputsFair Value at Range of Unobservable Inputs
December 31, 2016 Valuation Technique Unobservable Input(s)  (Weighted Average)December 31, 2018 Valuation Technique Unobservable Input(s) (Weighted Average)
(In Thousands) (In Thousands) 
Recurring fair value measurements:Recurring fair value measurements: Recurring fair value measurements: 
Other trading assets$859
 Discounted cash flow Default rate 10.1%
  Prepayment rate 6.2% - 11.1% (8.2%)
Interest rate contracts, net2,392
 Discounted cash flow Closing ratios (pull-through) 18.6% - 99.1% (68.5%)$2,012
 Discounted cash flow Closing ratios (pull-through) 15.0% - 99.6% (61.5%)
  Cap grids 0.1% - 2.3% (1.1%)  Cap grids 0.5% - 3.1% (1.0%)
Other assets - MSRs51,428
 Discounted cash flow Option adjusted spread 6.1% - 18.6% (8.1%)51,539
 Discounted cash flow Option adjusted spread 6.3% - 8.5% (6.5%)
  Constant prepayment rate or life speed 1.3% - 62.0% (15.7%)  Constant prepayment rate or life speed 0.0% - 43.6% (9.6%)
  Cost to service $65 - $4,000 ($79)  Cost to service $65 - $4,000 ($84)
Other assets - SBIC investments15,639
 Transaction price Transaction price N/A80,074
 Transaction price Transaction price N/A
Nonrecurring fair value measurements:Nonrecurring fair value measurements: Nonrecurring fair value measurements: 
Investment securities held to maturity$2,550
 Discounted cash flow Prepayment rate 10.9%
Debt securities held to maturity$4,380
 Discounted cash flow Prepayment rate 8.4%
  Default rate 9.2%  Default rate 9.4%
  Loss severity 63.7%  Loss severity 83.5%
Impaired loans59,807
 Appraised value Appraised value 0.0% - 80.0% (31.9%)57,968
 Appraised value Appraised value 0.0% - 70.0% (14.6%)
OREO21,112
 Appraised value Appraised value 8.0% (1)16,869
 Appraised value Appraised value 8.0% (1)
(1)Represents discount to appraised value for estimated costs to sell.
The following provides a description of the sensitivity of the valuation technique to changes in unobservable inputs for recurring fair value measurements.
Recurring Fair Value Measurements Using Significant Unobservable Inputs
Trading Account Assets – Interest-Only Strips
Significant unobservable inputs used in the valuation of the Company’s interest-only strips include default rates and prepayment assumptions. Significant increases in either of these inputs in isolation would result in significantly lower fair value measurements. Generally, a change in the assumption used for the probability of default is accompanied by a directionally opposite change in the assumption used for prepayment rates.
Interest Rate Contracts - Interest Rate Lock Commitments
Significant unobservable inputs used in the valuation of interest rate contracts are pull-through and cap grids. Increases or decreases in the pull-through or cap grids will have a corresponding impact in the value of interest rate contracts.
Other Assets - MSRs
The significant unobservable inputs used in the fair value measurement of MSRs are option-adjusted spreads, constant prepayment rate or life speed, and cost to service assumptions. The impact of prepayments and changes in the option-adjusted spread are based on a variety of underlying inputs. Increases or decreases to the underlying cash flow inputs will have a corresponding impact on the value of the MSR asset. The impact of the costs to service assumption will have a directionally opposite change in the fair value of the MSR asset.

Other Assets - SBIC Investments
The significant unobservable inputs used in the fair value measurement of SBIC Investments are initially based upon transaction price. Increases or decreases in valuation factors such as recent or proposed purchase or sale of debt or equity of the issuer, pricing by other dealers in similar securities, size of position held, liquidity of the market will have a corresponding impact in the value of SBIC investments.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments
The carrying amounts and estimated fair values, as well as the level within the fair value hierarchy, of the Company’s financial instruments, excluding financial instruments measured at fair value on a recurring basis, are as follows:
September 30, 2017March 31, 2019
Carrying Amount Estimated Fair Value Level 1 Level 2 Level 3Carrying Amount Estimated Fair Value Level 1 Level 2 Level 3
(In Thousands)(In Thousands)
Financial Instruments:                  
Assets:                  
Cash and cash equivalents$3,734,658
 $3,734,658
 $3,734,658
 $
 $
$6,008,461
 $6,008,461
 $6,008,461
 $
 $
Investment securities held to maturity1,077,372
 1,067,919
 
 
 1,067,919
Loans, net59,466,085
 56,701,917
 
 
 56,701,917
Debt securities held to maturity4,575,041
 4,654,927
 1,305,138
 2,587,208
 762,581
Loans and loans held for sale not measured at fair value, net63,988,406
 61,266,387
 
 
 61,266,387
Liabilities:                  
Deposits$67,213,567
 $67,260,405
 $
 $67,260,405
 $
$74,380,308
 $74,459,748
 $
 $74,459,748
 $
FHLB and other borrowings3,956,041
 4,005,971
 
 4,005,971
 
4,011,160
 4,018,267
 
 4,018,267
 
Federal funds purchased and securities sold under agreements to repurchase44,761
 44,761
 
 44,761
 
188,024
 188,024
 
 188,024
 
December 31, 2016December 31, 2018
Carrying Amount Estimated Fair Value Level 1 Level 2 Level 3Carrying Amount Estimated Fair Value Level 1 Level 2 Level 3
(In Thousands)(In Thousands)
Financial Instruments:                  
Assets:                  
Cash and cash equivalents$3,251,786
 $3,251,786
 $3,251,786
 $
 $
$3,332,626
 $3,332,626
 $3,332,626
 $
 $
Investment securities held to maturity1,203,217
 1,182,009
 
 
 1,182,009
Debt securities held to maturity2,885,613
 2,925,420
 
 2,106,510
 818,910
Loans, net59,222,970
 56,283,761
 
 
 56,283,761
64,301,312
 61,186,996
 
 
 61,186,996
Liabilities:                  
Deposits$67,279,533
 $67,359,299
 $
 $67,359,299
 $
$72,167,987
 $72,175,418
 $
 $72,175,418
 $
FHLB and other borrowings3,001,551
 3,001,836
 
 3,001,836
 
3,987,590
 3,935,945
 
 3,935,945
 
Federal funds purchased and securities sold under agreements to repurchase39,052
 39,052
 
 39,052
 
102,275
 102,275
 
 102,275
 
Other short-term borrowings50,000
 50,000
 
 50,000
 
Fair Value Option
The following methods and assumptions were used by the Company in estimatinghas elected to apply the fair value option for single family real estate mortgage loans originated for resale in the secondary market. The election allows for a more effective offset of its financial instruments not carried at fair value:
Cash and cash equivalents: Cash and cash equivalents have maturities of three months or less. Accordingly, the carrying amount approximates fair value. Because these amounts generally relate to either currency or highly liquid assets, these are considered a Level 1 measurement.
Investment securities held to maturity: Thechanges in fair values of securitiesthe loans and the derivative instruments used to economically hedge them without the burden of complying with the requirements for hedge accounting. The Company has not elected the fair value option for other loans held to maturityfor sale primarily because they are estimatednot economically hedged using a discounted cash flow approach. The discounted cash flow model uses inputs such as estimated prepayment speed, lossderivative instruments.
At both March 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, no loans held for sale for which the fair value option was elected were 90 days or more past due or were in nonaccrual. Interest income on mortgage loans held for sale is recognized based on contractual rates and default rates. They are considered a Level 3 measurement asis reflected in interest and fees on loans in the valuation employs significant unobservable inputs.

Loans: Loans are presented netCompany's Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of the allowance for loan lossesIncome. Net gains (losses) of $245 thousand and are valued using discounted cash flows. The discount rates used to determine the present$(173) thousand resulting from changes in fair value of these loans are based on current market interest rates for loans with similar credit riskwere recorded in noninterest income during the three months ended March 31, 2019 and term. They are considered a Level 3 measurement as the valuation employs significant unobservable inputs.2018, respectively.
Deposits: The fair values of demand deposits are equal to the carrying amounts. Demand deposits include noninterest bearing demand deposits, savings accounts, NOW accounts and money market demand accounts. Discounted cash flows have been used to value fixed rate term deposits. The discount rate used is based on interest rates currently being offered by the Company on comparable deposits as to amount and term. They are considered a Level 2 measurement as the valuation primarily employs observable inputs for similar instruments.
FHLB and other borrowings: Thealso had fair value changes on forward contracts related to residential mortgage loans held for sale of approximately $(89) thousand and $80 thousand for the Company’s fixed rate borrowings, which includes the Company’s Capital Securities, are estimated using discounted cash flows, based on the Company’s current incremental borrowing rates for similar typesthree months ended March 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively. An immaterial portion of borrowing arrangements. The carrying amount of the Company’s variable rate borrowings approximates fair value. As such, these borrowings are considered a Level 2 measurement as the valuation primarily employs observable inputs for similar instruments.
Federal fund purchased, securities sold under agreementsamounts was attributable to repurchase and short-term borrowings: The carrying amounts of federal funds purchased, securities sold under agreements to repurchase and other short-term borrowings approximates fair value. They are therefore considered a Level 2 measurement.changes in instrument-specific credit risk.

The following table summarizes the difference between the aggregate fair value and the aggregate unpaid principal balance for residential mortgage loans measured at fair value.
 Aggregate Fair Value Aggregate Unpaid Principal Balance Difference
 (In Thousands)
March 31, 2019     
Residential mortgage loans held for sale$76,938
 $73,978
 $2,960
December 31, 2018     
Residential mortgage loans held for sale$68,766
 $66,052
 $2,714
(9)(10) Comprehensive Income
Comprehensive income is defined as the change in equity of a business enterprise during a period from transactions and other events and circumstances arising from nonowner sources. The following summarizes the change in the components of other comprehensive income.
 Three Months Ended September 30,
 2017 2016
 Pretax Tax Expense/ (Benefit) After-tax Pretax Tax Expense/ (Benefit) After-tax
 (In Thousands)
Other comprehensive income:           
Unrealized holding losses arising during period from securities available for sale$(1,025) $(379) $(646) $(41,149) $(15,073) $(26,076)
Less: reclassification adjustment for net gains on sale of securities in net income3,033
 1,122
 1,911
 
 
 
Net change in unrealized losses on securities available for sale(4,058) (1,501) (2,557) (41,149) (15,073) (26,076)
Change in unamortized net holding losses on investment securities held to maturity1,586
 587
 999
 1,844
 676
 1,168
Change in unamortized non-credit related impairment on investment securities held to maturity399
 148
 251
 354
 129
 225
Net change in unamortized holding losses on securities held to maturity1,985
 735
 1,250
 2,198
 805
 1,393
Unrealized holding gains (losses) arising during period from cash flow hedge instruments1,367
 512
 855
 (2,303) (842) (1,461)
Change in defined benefit plans
 
 
 
 
 
Other comprehensive loss$(706) $(254) $(452) $(41,254) $(15,110) $(26,144)
            
            
 Nine Months Ended September 30,
 2017 2016
 Pretax Tax Expense/ (Benefit) After-tax Pretax Tax Expense/ (Benefit) After-tax
 (In Thousands)
Other comprehensive income:           
Unrealized holding gains arising during period from securities available for sale$61,774
 $22,855
 $38,919
 $103,507
 $37,915
 $65,592
Less: reclassification adjustment for net gains on sale of securities in net income3,033
 1,122
 1,911
 30,037
 11,002
 19,035
Net change in unrealized gains on securities available for sale58,741
 21,733
 37,008
 73,470
 26,913
 46,557
Change in unamortized net holding losses on investment securities held to maturity4,032
 1,492
 2,540
 4,615
 1,691
 2,924
Less: non-credit related impairment on investment securities held to maturity
 
 
 151
 55
 96
Change in unamortized non-credit related impairment on investment securities held to maturity1,236
 458
 778
 1,021
 373
 648
Net change in unamortized holding losses on securities held to maturity5,268
 1,950
 3,318
 5,485
 2,009
 3,476
Unrealized holding (losses) gains arising during period from cash flow hedge instruments(14,581) (5,409) (9,172) 2,734
 1,006
 1,728
Change in defined benefit plans(773) (288) (485) 1,300
 369
 931
Other comprehensive income$48,655
 $17,986
 $30,669
 $82,989
 $30,297
 $52,692

 Three Months Ended March 31,
 2019 2018
 Pretax Tax Expense/ (Benefit) After-tax Pretax Tax Expense/ (Benefit) After-tax
 (In Thousands)
Other comprehensive income (loss):           
Unrealized holding gains (losses) arising during period from debt securities available for sale$67,768
 $16,068
 $51,700
 $(54,845) $(12,986) $(41,859)
Less: reclassification adjustment for net gains on sale of debt securities in net income8,958
 2,124
 6,834
 
 
 
Net change in unrealized gains (losses) on debt securities available for sale58,810
 13,944
 44,866
 (54,845) (12,986) (41,859)
Change in unamortized net holding losses on debt securities held to maturity2,284
 541
 1,743
 2,639
 620
 2,019
Unamortized unrealized net holding losses on debt securities available for sale transferred to debt securities held to maturity
 
 
 (39,904) (9,417) (30,487)
Less: non-credit related impairment on debt securities held to maturity
 
 
 262
 62
 200
Change in unamortized non-credit related impairment on debt securities held to maturity482
 114
 368
 171
 41
 130
Net change in unamortized holding gains (losses) on debt securities held to maturity2,766
 655
 2,111
 (37,356) (8,818) (28,538)
Unrealized holding gains (losses) arising during period from cash flow hedge instruments31,518
 7,465
 24,053
 (87) 150
 (237)
Change in defined benefit plans4,089
 970
 3,119
 (4,425) (1,046) (3,379)
Other comprehensive income (loss)$97,183
 $23,034
 $74,149
 $(96,713) $(22,700) $(74,013)

Activity in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax was as follows:
 Unrealized Gains (Losses) on Securities Available for Sale and Transferred to Held to Maturity Accumulated Gains (Losses) on Cash Flow Hedging Instruments Defined Benefit Plan Adjustment Unamortized Impairment Losses on Investment Securities Held to Maturity Total
 (In Thousands)
Balance, December 31, 2015$(56,326) $(6,407) $(29,166) $(7,437) $(99,336)
Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications65,592
 2,787
 
 (96) 68,283
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)(16,111) (1,059) 931
 648
 (15,591)
Net current period other comprehensive income49,481
 1,728
 931
 552
 52,692
Balance, September 30, 2016$(6,845) $(4,679) $(28,235) $(6,885) $(46,644)
          
Balance, December 31, 2016$(119,562) $(10,080) $(32,028) $(6,582) $(168,252)
Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications38,919
 (6,000) 
 
 32,919
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)629
 (3,172) (485) 778
 (2,250)
Net current period other comprehensive income (loss)39,548
 (9,172) (485) 778
 30,669
Balance, September 30, 2017$(80,014) $(19,252) $(32,513) $(5,804) $(137,583)
 Unrealized Gains (Losses) on Debt Securities Available for Sale and Transferred to Held to Maturity Accumulated Gains (Losses) on Cash Flow Hedging Instruments Defined Benefit Plan Adjustment Unamortized Impairment Losses on Debt Securities Held to Maturity Total
 (In Thousands)
Balance, December 31, 2017$(132,821) $(24,765) $(34,228) $(5,591) $(197,405)
Cumulative effect of adoption of ASU 2016-01(13) 
 
 
 (13)
 $(132,834) $(24,765) $(34,228) $(5,591) $(197,418)
Other comprehensive loss before reclassifications(72,346) (7,407) 
 (200) (79,953)
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)2,019
 7,170
 (3,379) 130
 5,940
Net current period other comprehensive loss(70,327) (237) (3,379) (70) (74,013)
Balance, March 31, 2018$(203,161) $(25,002) $(37,607) $(5,661) $(271,431)
          
Balance, December 31, 2018$(158,433) $6,175
 $(29,495) $(5,095) $(186,848)
Cumulative effect of adoption of ASUs (1)(25,844) (1,040) (7,351) (1,201) (35,436)
 $(184,277) $5,135
 $(36,846) $(6,296) $(222,284)
Other comprehensive income before reclassifications51,700
 23,001
 
 
 74,701
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)(5,091) 1,052
 3,119
 368
 (552)
Net current period other comprehensive income46,609
 24,053
 3,119
 368
 74,149
Balance, March 31, 2019$(137,668) $29,188
 $(33,727) $(5,928) $(148,135)
(1)
Related to the Company's adoption of ASU 2017-12 and ASU 2018-02 on January 1, 2019. See Note 1, Basis of Presentation, for additional information.

The following table presents information on reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss).
Details About Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) Components 
Amounts Reclassified From Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)  (1)
 Condensed Consolidated Statement of Income Caption 
Amounts Reclassified From Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) (1)
 Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income Caption
 Three Months Ended September 30, Nine Months Ended September 30,  Three Months Ended March 31, 
 2017 2016 2017 2016  2019 2018 
 (In Thousands)  (In Thousands) 
Unrealized Gains (Losses) on Securities Available for Sale and Transferred to Held to Maturity $3,033
 $
 $3,033
 $30,037
 Investment securities gains, net
Unrealized Gains (Losses) on Debt Securities Available for Sale and Transferred to Held to Maturity $8,958
 $
 Investment securities gains, net
 (1,586) (1,844) (4,032) (4,615) Interest on investment securities held to maturity (2,284) (2,639) Interest on debt securities held to maturity
 1,447
 (1,844) (999) 25,422
  6,674
 (2,639) 
 (535) 676
 370
 (9,311) Income tax (expense) benefit (1,583) 620
 Income tax (expense) benefit
 $912
 $(1,168) $(629) $16,111
 Net of tax $5,091
 $(2,019) Net of tax
              
Accumulated Gains (Losses) on Cash Flow Hedging Instruments $(2,258) $1,654
 $6,920
 $5,587
 Interest and fees on loans $(1,210) $(8,890) Interest and fees on loans
 (577) (952) (1,877) (3,909) Interest and fees on FHLB advances (169) (495) Interest on FHLB and other borrowings
 (2,835) 702
 5,043
 1,678
  (1,379) (9,385) 
 1,054
 (260) (1,871) (619) Income tax (expense) benefit 327
 2,215
 Income tax benefit
 $(1,781) $442
 $3,172
 $1,059
 Net of tax $(1,052) $(7,170) Net of tax
              
Defined Benefit Plan Adjustment $
 $
 $773
 $(1,300) (2) $(4,089) $4,425
 (2)
 
 
 (288) 369
 Income tax (expense) benefit 970
 (1,046) Income tax benefit (expense)
 $
 $
 $485
 $(931) Net of tax $(3,119) $3,379
 Net of tax
              
Unamortized Impairment Losses on Investment Securities Held to Maturity $(399) $(354) $(1,236) $(1,021) Interest on investment securities held to maturity
Unamortized Impairment Losses on Debt Securities Held to Maturity $(482) $(171) Interest on debt securities held to maturity
 148
 129
 458
 373
 Income tax benefit 114
 41
 Income tax benefit
 $(251) $(225) $(778) $(648) Net of tax $(368) $(130) Net of tax
(1)
Amounts in parentheses indicate debits to the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated StatementStatements of Income.
(2)
These accumulated other comprehensive income components are included in the computation of net periodic pension cost (see Note 19,17, Benefit Plans, in the Notes to the December 31, 2016,2018, Consolidated Financial Statements for additional details).

(10)(11) Supplemental Disclosure for Statement of Cash Flows
The following table presents the Company’s supplemental disclosures for statement of cash flows.
Nine Months Ended September 30,Three Months Ended March 31,
2017 20162019 2018
(In Thousands)(In Thousands)
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information:      
Interest paid$331,062
 $339,345
$194,297
 $96,332
Net income taxes paid109,460
 94,808
Net income taxes paid (refunded)320
 (569)
Supplemental schedule of noncash investing and financing activities:      
Transfer of loans and loans held for sale to OREO$25,156
 $21,547
$6,534
 $4,736
Transfer of available for sale debt securities to held to maturity debt securities
 1,017,275
Transfer of loans to loans held for sale
 764,022
1,196,883
 
Issuance of restricted stock, net of cancellations
 1,083


The following table provides a reconciliation of cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash reported within the Company’s Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets that sum to the total of the same such amounts shown in the Company's Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows.
 Three Months Ended March 31,
 2019 2018
 (In Thousands)
Cash and cash equivalents$6,008,461
 $3,523,332
Restricted cash in other assets131,378
 171,562
Total cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash shown in the statement of cash flows$6,139,839
 $3,694,894
Restricted cash primarily represents cash collateral related to the Company's derivatives as well as amounts restricted for regulatory purposes related to BSI and BBVA Compass Payments, Inc. Restricted cash is included in other assets on the Company’s Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets.
(1112) Segment Information
The Company’s operating segments are based on the Company’s organizational structure. Each segment reflects the manner in which financial information is evaluated by management. The operating segment results include certain overhead allocations and intercompany transactions. All intercompany transactions have been eliminated to determine the consolidated balances. The Company operates primarily in the United States, and, accordingly, revenue and assets outside the United States are not material. There are no individual customers whose attributable revenues exceeded exceed 10% of consolidated revenue.
In August 2017, the Company announced a reorganization of its line of business structure that will divide the existing Consumer and Commercial Banking segment into a retail line of business and a commercial line of business. This will change the Company's segment reporting structure during the fourth quarter of 2017.
The following tables present the segment information for the Company’s existing segments.
 Three Months Ended September 30, 2017
 Consumer and Commercial Banking Corporate and Investment Banking Treasury Corporate Support and Other Consolidated
 (In Thousands)
Net interest income$526,201
 $43,645
 $648
 $18,867
 $589,361
Allocated provision for loan losses110,642
 (11,708) 
 4,500
 103,434
Noninterest income199,589
 56,231
 4,745
 (2,771) 257,794
Noninterest expense480,684
 43,496
 6,340
 43,442
 573,962
Net income (loss) before income tax expense (benefit)134,464
 68,088
 (947) (31,846) 169,759
Income tax expense (benefit)47,063
 23,831
 (331) (31,255) 39,308
Net income87,401
 44,257
 (616) (591) 130,451
Less: net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests176
 
 414
 (6) 584
Net income (loss) attributable to BBVA Compass Bancshares, Inc.$87,225
 $44,257
 $(1,030) $(585) $129,867
Average assets$54,661,908
 $9,869,664
 $15,686,910
 $7,081,497
 $87,299,979
Three Months Ended September 30, 2016Three Months Ended March 31, 2019
Consumer and Commercial Banking Corporate and Investment Banking Treasury Corporate Support and Other ConsolidatedCommercial Banking and Wealth Retail Banking Corporate and Investment Banking Treasury Corporate Support and Other Consolidated
(In Thousands)(In Thousands)
Net interest income (expense)$519,774
 $33,785
 $(4,250) $(34,500) $514,809
$339,608
 $383,820
 $37,814
 $(20,477) $(57,676) $683,089
Allocated provision for loan losses52,358
 18,208
 
 (5,459) 65,107
Allocated provision (credit) for loan losses57,440
 103,405
 25,930
 373
 (4,856) 182,292
Noninterest income198,967
 54,168
 7,960
 2,670
 263,765
60,985
 112,135
 36,517
 12,486
 35,637
 257,760
Noninterest expense476,569
 34,939
 5,101
 39,662
 556,271
181,561
 298,594
 39,879
 5,589
 56,350
 581,973
Net income (loss) before income tax expense (benefit)189,814
 34,806
 (1,391) (66,033) 157,196
161,592
 93,956
 8,522
 (13,953) (73,533) 176,584
Income tax expense (benefit)66,435
 12,182
 (487) (41,285) 36,845
33,935
 19,731
 1,790
 (2,930) (16,923) 35,603
Net income (loss)123,379
 22,624
 (904) (24,748) 120,351
127,657
 74,225
 6,732
 (11,023) (56,610) 140,981
Less: net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests107
 
 420
 (4) 523
Less: net income attributable to noncontrolling interests96
 
 
 405
 55
 556
Net income (loss) attributable to BBVA Compass Bancshares, Inc.$123,272
 $22,624
 $(1,324) $(24,744) $119,828
$127,561
 $74,225
 $6,732
 $(11,428) $(56,665) $140,425
Average assets$54,398,207
 $13,006,089
 $16,462,880
 $7,033,163
 $90,900,339
$40,168,306
 $19,191,981
 $8,214,217
 $17,214,202
 $8,197,170
 $92,985,876

 Nine Months Ended September 30, 2017
 Consumer and Commercial Banking Corporate and Investment Banking Treasury Corporate Support and Other Consolidated
 (In Thousands)
Net interest income$1,561,941
 $117,401
 $22,791
 $24,489
 $1,726,622
Allocated provision for loan losses205,484
 16,311
 
 7,063
 228,858
Noninterest income584,516
 151,166
 8,380
 4,744
 748,806
Noninterest expense1,443,457
 111,675
 18,983
 121,644
 1,695,759
Net income (loss) before income tax expense (benefit)497,516
 140,581
 12,188
 (99,474) 550,811
Income tax expense (benefit)174,131
 49,203
 4,266
 (85,503) 142,097
Net income (loss)323,385
 91,378
 7,922
 (13,971) 408,714
Less: net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests216
 
 1,250
 (8) 1,458
Net income (loss) attributable to BBVA Compass Bancshares, Inc.$323,169
 $91,378
 $6,672
 $(13,963) $407,256
Average assets$54,446,725
 $10,555,362
 $15,375,036
 $7,105,233
 $87,482,356
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2016Three Months Ended March 31, 2018
Consumer and Commercial Banking Corporate and Investment Banking Treasury Corporate Support and Other ConsolidatedCommercial Banking and Wealth Retail Banking Corporate and Investment Banking Treasury Corporate Support and Other Consolidated
(In Thousands)(In Thousands)
Net interest income (expense)$1,536,010
 $122,946
 $(26,176) $(96,851) $1,535,929
$322,872
 $341,378
 $46,396
 $(4,273) $(83,768) $622,605
Allocated provision for loan losses167,559
 87,729
 
 9,737
 265,025
Allocated provision (credit) for loan losses20,407
 29,057
 (18,209) (121) 25,895
 57,029
Noninterest income592,323
 146,492
 47,407
 8,994
 795,216
61,238
 108,752
 41,792
 6,725
 39,318
 257,825
Noninterest expense1,423,397
 144,993
 15,289
 105,773
 1,689,452
168,104
 286,826
 39,610
 5,589
 62,784
 562,913
Net income (loss) before income tax expense (benefit)537,377
 36,716
 5,942
 (203,367) 376,668
195,599
 134,247
 66,787
 (3,016) (133,129) 260,488
Income tax expense (benefit)188,082
 12,851
 2,079
 (108,464) 94,548
41,076
 28,192
 14,025
 (633) (30,862) 51,798
Net income (loss)349,295
 23,865
 3,863
 (94,903) 282,120
154,523
 106,055
 52,762
 (2,383) (102,267) 208,690
Less: net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests306
 
 1,271
 (8) 1,569
Less: net income attributable to noncontrolling interests35
 
 
 409
 17
 461
Net income (loss) attributable to BBVA Compass Bancshares, Inc.$348,989
 $23,865
 $2,592
 $(94,895) $280,551
$154,488
 $106,055
 $52,762
 $(2,792) $(102,284) $208,229
Average assets$54,603,369
 $13,879,094
 $16,395,875
 $7,000,089
 $91,878,427
$37,667,960
 $18,258,376
 $8,280,917
 $15,898,805
 $7,664,851
 $87,770,909
The financial information presented was derived from the internal profitability reporting system used by management to monitor and manage the financial performance of the Company. This information is based on internal management accounting policies that have been developed to reflect the underlying economics of the businesses. These policies address the methodologies applied and include policies related to funds transfer pricing, cost allocations and capital allocations.
Funds transfer pricing was used in the determination of net interest income earned primarily on loans and deposits. The method employed for funds transfer pricing is a matched funding concept whereby operating segmentslines of business which are fund providers are credited and those that are fund users are charged based on maturity, prepayment and/or repricing characteristics applied on an instrument level. Costs for centrally managed operations are generally allocated to the operating segmentlines of business based on the utilization of services provided or other appropriate indicators. Capital is allocated to the operating segmentslines of business based upon the underlying risks in each business taking into accountconsidering economic and regulatory capital standards.

The development and application of these methodologies is a dynamic process. Accordingly, prior period financialsfinancial results have been revised to reflect management accounting enhancements and changes in the Company's organizational structure due to the transfer of certain customer relationships within its large middle market customer group from the Consumer and Commercial Banking segment to the Corporate and Investment Banking segment that occurred during the fourth quarter of 2016.structure. The 20162018 segment information has been revised to conform to the 20172019 presentation. In addition, unlike financial accounting, there is no authoritative literature for management accounting similar to U.S. GAAP. Consequently, reported results are not necessarily comparable towith those presented by other financial institutions.

(13) Revenue from Contracts with Customers
The following tables depict the disaggregation of revenue according to revenue type and segment.
  Commercial Banking and Wealth Retail Banking Corporate and Investment Banking Treasury and Corporate Support and Other Total
  (In Thousands)
Three Months Ended March 31, 2019        
Service charges on deposit accounts $12,340
 $44,917
 $1,651
 $
 $58,908
Card and merchant processing fees 8,287
 34,180
 
 3,535
 46,002
Investment services sales fees 26,696
 
 
 
 26,696
Money transfer income 
 
 
 21,981
 21,981
Investment banking and advisory fees 
 
 18,857
 
 18,857
Asset management fees 10,767
 
 
 
 10,767
  58,090
 79,097
 20,508
 25,516
 183,211
Other revenues (1) 2,895
 33,038
 16,009
 22,607
 74,549
Total noninterest income $60,985
 $112,135
 $36,517
 $48,123
 $257,760
           
Three Months Ended March 31, 2018          
Service charges on deposit accounts $11,206
 $43,340
 $1,615
 $
 $56,161
Card and merchant processing fees 6,704
 29,953
 
 3,021
 39,678
Investment services sales fees 30,108
 
 
 
 30,108
Money transfer income 
 
 
 20,688
 20,688
Investment banking and advisory fees 
 
 23,896
 
 23,896
Asset management fees 10,770
 
 
 
 10,770
  58,788
 73,293
 25,511
 23,709
 181,301
Other revenues (1) 2,450
 35,459
 16,281
 22,334
 76,524
Total noninterest income $61,238
 $108,752
 $41,792
 $46,043
 $257,825
(1)Other revenues primarily relate to revenues not derived from contracts with customers.
(12)(14) Related Party Transactions
The Company enters into various transactions with BBVA that affect the Company’s business and operations. The following discloses the significant transactions between the Company and BBVA during 20172019 and 20162018.
The Company believes all of the transactions entered into between the Company and BBVA were transacted on terms that were no more or less beneficial to the Company than similar transactions entered into with unrelated market participants, including interest rates and transaction costs. The Company foresees executing similar transactions with BBVA in the future.

Derivatives
The Company has entered into various derivative contracts as noted below with BBVA as the upstream counterparty. The total notional amount of outstanding derivative contracts between the Company and BBVA are $5.6 billion and $5.2$4.1 billion as of September 30, 2017both March 31, 2019 and December 31, 2016, respectively.2018. The net fair value of outstanding derivative contracts between the Company and BBVA are detailed below.
September 30, 2017 December 31, 2016March 31, 2019 December 31, 2018
(In Thousands)(In Thousands)
Derivative contracts:  
Fair value hedges$(8,898) $(14,225)$(13,132) $(24,839)
Cash flow hedges340
 (380)215
 174
Free-standing derivatives not designated as hedging instruments(1,379) (14,326)14,259
 23,378
Securities Purchased Under Agreements to Resell/ Securities Sold Under Agreements to Repurchase
The Company enters into agreements with BBVA as the counterparty under which it purchases/sells securities subject to an obligation to resell/repurchase the same or similar securities. The following represents the amount of securities purchased under agreement to resell and securities sold under agreement to repurchase where BBVA is the counterparty.
September 30, 2017 December 31, 2016March 31, 2019 December 31, 2018
(In Thousands)(In Thousands)
Securities purchased under agreements to resell$
 $8,330
$187,447
 $109,947
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase44,761
 23,397
29,095
 
Borrowings
BSI, a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company, had a $420 million revolving note and cash subordination agreement with BBVA that was executed on March 16, 2012, with an original maturity date of March 16, 2018. On March 16, 2017, the agreement was amended to increase the available amount to $450 million and the maturity date was extended to March 16, 2023. On March 16, 2017, BSI also has a $150 million line of creditentered into an uncommitted demand facility agreement with BBVA that was initiated on August 1, 2014.for a revolving loan facility up to $1 billion to be used for trade settlement purposes. BSI has not drawn against this facility in 2019. At September 30, 2017both March 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018 there was no amount outstanding under the line of credit agreementrevolving note and $50 million outstanding at December 31, 2016. At both September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 there was no amount outstanding under the cash subordination agreement. Interest expense related to these agreements was $25 thousand and $1.1 million$120 thousand for the three months ended September 30, 2017March 31, 2019 and 2016,2018, respectively, and are included in interest on other short-term borrowings within the Company's Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income. Interest expense related to these agreements was $917 thousand and $2.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016,

respectively, and are included in interest on other short-term borrowings within the Company's Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income.
Service and Referral Agreements
The Company and its affiliates entered into or were subject to various service and referral agreements with BBVA and its affiliates. Each of the agreements was done in the ordinary course of business and on market terms. Income associated with these agreements was $13.2$4.1 million and $6.5$12.1 million for the three months ended September 30, 2017March 31, 2019 and 2016,2018, respectively, and is recorded as a component of noninterest income within the Company's Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income. Expenses associated with these agreements was $8.7$8.5 million and $6.6$7.3 million for the three months ended September 30, 2017March 31, 2019 and 2016, respectively, and is recorded as a component of noninterest expense within the Company's Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income. Income associated with these agreements was $27.1 million and $9.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively, and is recorded as a component of noninterest income within the Company's Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income. Expenses associated with these agreements was $21.3 million and $19.2 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016,2018, respectively, and is recorded as a component of noninterest expense within the Company's Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income.
Series A Preferred Stock
BBVA is the sole holder of the Series A Preferred Stock that the Company issued in December 2015. At September 30, 2017,both March 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, the carrying amount of the Series A Preferred Stock was approximately $229 million.$229 million. During the ninethree months ended September 30, 2017March 31, 2019 and 2016,2018, the Company paid $11.0$4.5 million and $10.1$3.9 million, respectively, of preferred stock dividends to BBVA.

Loan Sales to Related Parties
During the three months ended March 31, 2019, the Company transferred $1.2 billion of commercial loans to loans held for sale as the Company plans to sell these loans to BBVA, S.A. New York Branch. These loans are carried at the lower of cost or fair value. The loss recorded at transfer to loans held for sale was not material.


Item 2.
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Critical Accounting Policies
The accounting principles followed by the Company and the methods of applying these principles conform with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and with general practices within the banking industry. The Company’s critical accounting policies relatepolicy relates to (1) the allowance for loan losses, (2) fair value of financial instruments, and (3) goodwill impairment. Theselosses. This critical accounting policies requirepolicy requires the use of estimates, assumptions and judgments which are based on information available as of the date of the financial statements. Accordingly, as this information changes, future financial statements could reflect the use of different estimates, assumptions and judgments. Certain determinations inherently have a greater reliance on the use of estimates, assumptions and judgments and, as such, have a greater possibility of producing results that could be materially different than originally reported. The Company’s significant accounting policies and changes in accounting principles and effects of new accounting pronouncements are discussed in detail in Note 1 in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016.2018. Additional disclosures regarding the effects of new accounting pronouncements are included in Note 1, Basis of Presentation, in the Notes to the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, included herein.
Executive Overview
Financial Performance
Consolidated net income attributable to the Company for the three months ended September 30, 2017March 31, 2019 was $129.9$140.4 million compared to $119.8$208.2 million earned during the three months ended September 30, 2016.March 31, 2018. The Company’s results of operations for the three months ended September 30, 2017,March 31, 2019, reflected higher net income before income tax expense primarily as a result of higher net interest income and lower income tax expense offset by lower noninterest income and the impact of higher provision for loan losses and noninterest expense.
Net interest income totaled $589.4$683.1 million for the three months ended September 30, 2017March 31, 2019 compared to $514.8$622.6 million for the three months ended September 30, 2016.March 31, 2018. The net interest margin for the three months ended September 30, 2017March 31, 2019 was 3.13%3.41%, compared to 2.62%3.27% for the three months ended September 30, 2016.March 31, 2018. Net interest income was positively impacted by higher interest rates due to the impact of increases in the Federal Reserve Board benchmark interest rate increases.partially offset by higher funding costs.
The provision for loan losses was $103.4$182.3 million for the three months ended September 30, 2017March 31, 2019 compared to $65.1$57.0 million offor the three months ended March 31, 2018. The increase in provision for loan losses for the three months ended September 30, 2016. TheMarch 31, 2019 was driven by higher losses within the consumer direct loan portfolio as well as an increase in provision for loan losses was primarily due to $60 million of additionalthe allowance for loan losses related to the estimated impact of Hurricanes Harvey and Irma on the loan portfolio during the three months ended September 30, 2017 offset in part by a reduction in provision expense associated with improvements in credit quality indicatorsindividually evaluated nonperforming loans in the energy portfolio during the three months ended September 30, 2017.commercial, financial and agricultural loan portfolio.
Net charge-offs for the three months ended September 30, 2017March 31, 2019 totaled $71.3$101.5 million which represented a $25.2 million increase compared to $46.1$67.7 million for the three months ended September 30, 2016.March 31, 2018. The increase in net charge-offs for the three months ended September 30, 2017March 31, 2019 as compared to the corresponding period in 20162018 was primarily driven by a $5.8 million increase in commercial, financial and agricultural net charge-offs, an $8.1 million increase in commercial real estate - mortgage net charge-offs, and a $5.4$28.5 million increase in consumer direct net charge-offs.
Noninterest income was $257.8 million a decrease of $6.0 million compared tofor both the three months ended September 30, 2016. The decrease in noninterest income was largely attributable to a $4.8 million decrease in mortgage banking, as well as a $3.9 million decrease in investment bankingMarch 31, 2019 and advisory fees, and a $3.3 million decrease in retail investment sales offset by a $3.0 million increase in investment securities gains2018.
Noninterest expense increased $17.7$19.1 million to $574.0$582.0 million for the three months ended September 30, 2017March 31, 2019 compared to $556.3$562.9 million for the three months ended September 30, 2016.March 31, 2018. The increase was driven by a $17.0$3.3 million increase in professional services, $2.0 million increase in equipment, a $1.3 million increase in money transfer expense, and a $9.0 million increase in other noninterest expense due,primarily attributable to an increase in part, to higher levels of provisionsprovision for unfunded commitments and higher levels of business development expense.

commitments.
Income tax expense was $39.3$35.6 million for the three months ended September 30, 2017March 31, 2019 compared to $36.8$51.8 million for the three months ended September 30, 2016.March 31, 2018. This resulted in an effective tax rate of 23.2%20.2% for 2017the three months ended March 31, 2019 and 23.4%19.9% for 2016.three months ended March 31, 2018.
The Company's total assets at September 30, 2017March 31, 2019 were $85.7$93.8 billion, a decreasean increase of $1.4$2.9 billion from December 31, 20162018 levels. The primary driver of the change in total assets was the $2.6 billion decrease in trading account assets due to a decrease in U.S. Treasury securities held by BSI. Total loans, excluding loans held for sale, were $60.3$63.8 billion at September 30, 2017, an increaseMarch 31, 2019, a decrease of $254 million$1.4 billion or 0.4%2.2% from year-end December 31, 20162018 levels. The increasedecrease in loans was primarily driven by increasesdue to the transfer of $1.2

billion in both commercial and consumer loans.loans to loans held for sale. Deposits decreased $66 millionincreased $2.2 billion or 0.1%3.1% compared to December 31, 2016.2018, driven by an increase in interest bearing transaction accounts which increased 4.8%.
Total shareholder's equity at September 30, 2017March 31, 2019 was $13.1$13.7 billion, an increase of $365$215 million compared to December 31, 2016.2018.
Capital and Regulatory
Under the Basel III transitional provisions, the Company's Tier1 and CET1 ratios were 12.42%12.67% and 12.07%12.34%, respectively, at September 30, 2017March 31, 2019 compared to 11.85%12.33% and 11.49%12.00%, respectively, at December 31, 2016.2018.
On August 1, 2017,In April 2019 the federal banking agencies issued proposed rules that would adjust the thresholds at which certain enhanced prudential standards and Basel III capital and liquidity requirements apply to FBOs, including BBVA, received notificationand the U.S. IHCs of FBOs, including the Parent, pursuant to the EGRRCPA.  The FBO Tailoring Proposals would establish risk-based categories for FBOs and their U.S. IHCs that would determine whether and to what extent enhanced prudential standards and certain capital and liquidity requirements apply to FBOs and their U.S. IHCs.  If the FBO Tailoring Proposals are adopted as proposed, BBVA and the Parent would be subject to less restrictive enhanced prudential standards and capital and liquidity requirements than under current regulations.  In addition, in April 2019 the Federal Reserve Board determinedand the FDIC issued a proposed rule that would reduce or eliminate resolution planning requirements for institutions that fall into certain risk-based categories.  If the election byResolution Plan Proposal is adopted as proposed, BBVA, the Company and the Bank would be subject to become an FHC was effectivereduced resolution planning requirements.  The Company cannot predict at this time, however, whether the FBO Tailoring Proposals or the Resolution Plan Proposal will be adopted as proposed and what effect any such final rules would have on the Company, its subsidiaries, or these entities’ activities, financial condition and/or results of August 1, 2017.operations.
Liquidity
The Company’s sources of liquidity include customers’ interest-bearing and noninterest-bearing deposit accounts, loan principal and interest payments, investment securities, short-term investments and borrowings. As a holding company, the Parent’s primary source of liquidity is dividends from the Bank. Due to the net earnings restrictions on dividend distributions under Alabama law, the Bank must obtain regulatory approval prior to paying any dividends.
During 2017, the Parent paid common dividends of $60.0 million to its sole shareholder, BBVA. Any dividends paid by the Parent must be set forth as capital actions in the Company's capital plan and not objected to by the Federal Reserve Board.
At September 30, 2017,The Federal Reserve Board will no longer take action to require the Company to comply with the Federal Reserve Board’s LCR rule until it formally amends its regulations to implement the EGRRCPA. At March 31, 2019, the Company's LCR was 145% and was fully compliant with the liquidity coverage ratio rule. LCR requirements.
Management believes that the current sources of liquidity are adequate to meet the Company’s requirements and plans for continued growth.
Other
ImpactOn April 24, 2019, BBVA announced that it is moving to unify its brand globally. In the coming months, the Bank will begin the process of Hurricanes Harvey and Irma
Duringtransitioning away from the third quarter of 2017, the Company's geographic footprint was impacted by Hurricanes Harvey and Irma. Hurricane Harvey struck the coast of Texas in August 2017 and caused significant flood and wind damage to the cities close to the Gulf Coast. In September 2017, Hurricane Irma struck south Florida and then continued inland impacting parts of Georgia and South Carolina and causing significant flood and wind damage.
At September 30, 2017, the Company has identified approximately $11.9 billion of outstanding loans, consisting of approximately $5.9 billion of consumer loans and $6.0 billion of commercial loans, in the most significantly impacted areas. As part of its ongoing evaluation process, the Company has identified loans where the mailing address or collateral were located within FEMA designated disaster zip codes, surveyed borrowers in the impacted areas, and evaluated applicable insurance coverage. At September 30, 2017 based on this initial evaluation, the Company has recorded approximately $60 million in additional allowance for loan losses related to its best estimate of hurricane-related losses in this portion of its loan portfolio.
The amountuse of the allowance for loan losses related to the Hurricanes HarveyBBVA Compass name and Irma impacted loan portfolio may change in the futurebe re-branding as additional or different information affecting customers in these areas is obtained. Additionally, the impacted loan portfolio may be subject to additional pressure on credit quality metrics including past due, criticized, and nonperforming loans, as well as net charge-offs.
The Company had nine branches that sustained significant damage due to hurricanes. At September 30, 2017, the Company has recognized approximately $2.2 million in expenses related to property damage not covered by insurance.

Additionally, for the three months ended September 30, 2017, the Company has recognized approximately $1.5 million of expense associated with relief efforts and commitments made to employees and other charitable organizations.BBVA.
Analysis of Results of Operations
Consolidated net income attributable to the Company totaled $129.9$140.4 million and $119.8$208.2 million for the three months ended September 30, 2017March 31, 2019 and 2016,2018, respectively. The Company’s results of operations for the three months ended September 30, 2017,March 31, 2019, reflected higher net income before income tax expense primarily as a result of higher net interest income and lower income tax expense offset by lower noninterest income and the impact of higher provision for loan losses and noninterest expense.
Consolidated net income attributable to the Company totaled $407.3 million and $280.6 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively. The Company’s results of operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2017, reflected higher net income before income tax expense primarily as a result of higher net interest income and lower provision for loan losses and noninterest expense.

Net Interest Income and Net Interest Margin
Net interest income is the principal component of the Company’s income stream and represents the difference, or spread, between interest and fee income generated from earning assets and the interest expense paid on deposits and borrowed funds. Fluctuations in interest rates as well as changes in the volume and mix of earning assets and interest bearing liabilities can impact net interest income. The following discussion of net interest income is presented on a fully taxable equivalent basis, unless otherwise noted, to facilitate performance comparisons among various taxable and tax-exempt assets.
Three Months Ended September 30, 2017March 31, 2019 and 20162018
Net interest income totaled $589.4$683.1 million for the three months ended September 30, 2017March 31, 2019 compared to $514.8$622.6 million for the three months ended September 30, 2016.March 31, 2018.
Net interest income on a fully taxable equivalent basis totaled $611.3$696.3 million for the three months ended September 30, 2017,March 31, 2019, an increase of $76.6$61.3 million compared with $534.7$635.0 million for the three months ended September 30, 2016.March 31, 2018. The increase in net interest income was primarily the result of an increase in interest income on loans and investment securities as well as a decreaseoffset by an increase in interest expense on other short-term borrowings.interest bearing deposits.
Net interest margin was 3.13%3.41% for the three months ended September 30, 2017March 31, 2019 compared to 2.62%3.27% for the three months ended September 30, 2016.March 31, 2018. The 5114 basis point increase in net interest margin was primarily driven by the impact of higher interest rates.
The fully taxable equivalent yield for the three months ended September 30, 2017, forMarch 31, 2019, on the loan portfolio was 4.23%5.03% compared to 3.74%4.40% for the same period in 2016.2018. The 4963 basis point increase was primarily driven by the impact of higher interest rates.
The fully taxable equivalent yield on the investment securities portfolio was 1.89%2.45% for the three months ended September 30, 2017March 31, 2019 compared to 1.83%2.13% for the three months ended September 30, 2016.March 31, 2018. The 6 basis point increase was a result of increases in interest rates. Additionally, as interest rates have increased the amount of premium amortization required has decreased as actual and expected prepayments have decreased.
The yield on trading account securities increased to 1.77% for the three months ended September 30, 2017 compared to 1.41% for the three months ended September 30, 2016, primarily due to the impact of higher interest rates.
The average rate paid on interest bearing deposits was 0.67%1.42% for the three months ended September 30, 2017March 31, 2019 compared to 0.64%0.83% for the three months ended September 30, 2016.March 31, 2018 and reflects the impact of higher funding costs on interest bearing deposit offerings including savings, money market and CD products.
The average rate paid on FHLB and other borrowings for the three months ended September 30, 2017March 31, 2019 was 2.35%3.56% compared to 2.06%3.03% for the corresponding period in 2016.2018. The 2953 basis point increase was primarily driven by the impact of higher rate FHLB advances as well as the impact of the $750 million$1.2 billion issuance of unsecured senior notes in June 2017.

The average rate paid on other short-term borrowings for the three months ended September 30, 2017 decreased to 1.04% compared to 1.43% for the three months ended September 30, 2016, due primarily to the impact of the decrease in the average balance of other short-term borrowings.
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2017 and 2016
Net interest income totaled $1.7 billion for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 compared to $1.5 billion for the nine months ended September 30, 2016.
Net interest income on a fully taxable equivalent basis totaled $1.8 billion for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 compared with $1.6 billion for the nine months ended September 30, 2016. The increase in net interest income was primarily the result of an increase in interest income on loans and investment securities as well as a decrease in interest expense on deposits and other-short term borrowings.
Net interest margin was 3.07% for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 compared to 2.60% for the nine months ended September 30, 2016. The 47 basis point increase in net interest margin was primarily driven by the impact of higher interest rates.
The fully taxable equivalent yield for the nine months ended September 30, 2017, for the loan portfolio was 4.13% compared to 3.73% for the same period in 2016. The 40 basis point increase was primarily driven by the impact of higher interest rates.
The fully taxable equivalent yield on the investment securities portfolio was 1.96% for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 compared to 1.71% for the nine months ended September 30, 2016. The 25 basis point increase was a result of increases in interest rates. Additionally, as interest rates have increased the amount of premium amortization required has decreased as actual and expected prepayments have decreased.
The yield on trading account securities increased to 1.58% for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 compared to 1.43% for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 primarily due to the impact of higher interest rates.
The average rate paid on interest bearing deposits was 0.62% for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 compared to 0.65% for the nine months ended September 30, 2016.
The average rate paid on FHLB and other borrowings for the nine months ended September 30, 2017, was 2.32% compared to 1.73% for the corresponding period in 2016. The 59 basis point increase was primarily driven by the impact of interest rate contracts hedging FHLB and other borrowings.
The average rate paid on other short-term borrowings for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 increased to 1.45% compared to 1.41% for the nine months ended September 30, 2016.2018.

The following table sets forth the major components of net interest income and the related annualized yields and rates.
Table 1
Consolidated Average Balance and Yield/ Rate Analysis
Table 1
Consolidated Average Balance and Yield/ Rate Analysis
Table 1
Consolidated Average Balance and Yield/ Rate Analysis
Three Months Ended September 30, 2017 Three Months Ended September 30, 2016Three Months Ended March 31, 2019 Three Months Ended March 31, 2018
Average Balance Income/Expense Yield/ Rate Average Balance Income/ Expense Yield/RateAverage Balance Income/Expense Yield/ Rate Average Balance Income/ Expense Yield/Rate
(Dollars in Thousands)(Dollars in Thousands)
Assets:                      
Interest earning assets:                      
Loans (1) (2) (3)$60,271,504
 $642,670
 4.23% $61,060,433
 $574,748
 3.74%$65,482,395
 $812,415
 5.03% $62,200,448
 $674,830
 4.40%
Investment securities – AFS (tax exempt) (3)
1,399
 24
 6.81
 9,569
 195
 8.11
Investment securities – AFS (taxable)12,315,872
 53,915
 1.74
 11,363,752
 48,255
 1.69
Total investment securities – AFS12,317,271
 53,939
 1.74
 11,373,321
 48,450
 1.69
Investment securities – HTM (tax exempt) (3)963,089
 8,867
 3.65
 1,059,610
 8,672
 3.26
Investment securities – HTM (taxable)159,804
 1,221
 3.03
 189,672
 1,029
 2.16
Total investment securities - HTM1,122,893
 10,088
 3.56
 1,249,282
 9,701
 3.09
Debt securities – AFS9,922,400
 53,522
 2.19
 11,424,405
 56,605
 2.01
Debt securities – HTM (tax exempt) (3)658,910
 6,091
 3.75
 886,774
 7,054
 3.23
Debt securities – HTM (taxable)3,375,382
 24,674
 2.96
 1,109,635
 6,848
 2.50
Total debt securities - HTM4,034,292
 30,765
 3.09
 1,996,409
 13,902
 2.82
Trading account securities (3)1,396,429
 6,247
 1.77
 3,637,782
 12,927
 1.41
81,552
 539
 2.68
 121,371
 751
 2.51
Other (4) (5) (6)2,313,287
 11,557
 1.98
 3,718,225
 4,563
 0.49
Other (4) (5)3,170,307
 22,968
 2.94
 3,098,494
 11,875
 1.55
Total earning assets77,421,384
 724,501
 3.71
 81,039,043
 650,389
 3.19
82,690,946
 920,209
 4.51
 78,841,127
 757,963
 3.90
Noninterest earning assets:                      
Cash and due from banks (6)1,038,203
     1,301,649
    
Cash and due from banks1,293,095
     580,515
    
Allowance for loan losses(821,227)     (848,067)    (909,663)     (844,248)    
Net unrealized (loss) gain on investment securities available for sale(76,457)     25,595
    (187,905)     (228,187)    
Other noninterest earning assets9,738,076
     9,382,119
    10,099,403
     9,421,702
    
Total assets$87,299,979
     $90,900,339
    $92,985,876
     $87,770,909
    
Liabilities:                      
Interest bearing liabilities:                      
Interest bearing demand deposits$7,557,010
 6,819
 0.36
 $6,824,519
 4,077
 0.24
$8,685,693
 20,346
 0.95
 $8,195,605
 9,581
 0.47
Savings and money market accounts24,551,131
 27,962
 0.45
 25,663,079
 24,395
 0.38
27,218,571
 76,909
 1.15
 25,526,343
 38,890
 0.62
Certificates and other time deposits12,408,794
 40,302
 1.29
 14,670,360
 47,507
 1.29
16,116,509
 85,099
 2.14
 14,109,950
 48,876
 1.40
Foreign office deposits
 
 
 106,219
 52
 0.19
Total interest bearing deposits44,516,935
 75,083
 0.67
 47,264,177
 76,031
 0.64
52,020,773
 182,354
 1.42
 47,831,898
 97,347
 0.83
FHLB and other borrowings5,053,340
 29,904
 2.35
 4,121,742
 21,315
 2.06
4,290,724
 37,626
 3.56
 3,310,286
 24,756
 3.03
Federal funds purchased and securities sold under agreements to repurchase (5)52,034
 4,623
 35.25
 232,451
 4,934
 8.44
411,925
 3,747
 3.69
 22,235
 536
 9.78
Other short-term borrowings1,386,329
 3,641
 1.04
 3,737,212
 13,453
 1.43
28,117
 196
 2.83
 51,626
 344
 2.70
Total interest bearing liabilities51,008,638
 113,251
 0.88
 55,355,582
 115,733
 0.83
56,751,539
 223,923
 1.60
 51,216,045
 122,983
 0.97
Noninterest bearing deposits21,072,789
     20,715,562
    20,183,069
     21,581,905
    
Other noninterest bearing liabilities2,087,637
     2,018,455
    2,410,613
     1,882,541
    
Total liabilities74,169,064
     78,089,599
    79,345,221
     74,680,491
    
Shareholder’s equity13,130,915
     12,810,740
    13,640,655
     13,090,418
    
Total liabilities and shareholder’s equity$87,299,979
     $90,900,339
    $92,985,876
     $87,770,909
    
Net interest income/net interest spread  $611,250
 2.83%   $534,656
 2.36%  $696,286
 2.91%   $634,980
 2.93%
Net interest margin    3.13%     2.62%    3.41%     3.27%
Taxable equivalent adjustment  21,889
     19,847
    13,197
     12,375
  
Net interest income  $589,361
     $514,809
    $683,089
     $622,605
  
(1)
Loans include loans held for sale and nonaccrual loans.
(2)
Interest income includes loan fees for rate calculation purposes.
(3)
Yields are stated on a fully taxable equivalent basis assuming the tax rate in effect for each period presented.
(4)
Includes federal funds sold, securities purchased under agreements to resell, interest bearing deposits, and other earning assets.
(5)Yield/rate reflects impact of balance sheet offsetting. See Note 6, Securities Financing Activities, in the notes to the financial statements.
(6)Beginning in the fourth quarter of 2016, interest bearing deposits with the Federal Reserve are included in earning assets. Previous to this change, these balances were included as noninterest earning assets within cash and due from banks. Prior periods have been reclassified to conform to current period presentation.

Table 1
Consolidated Average Balance and Yield/ Rate Analysis
 Nine Months Ended September 30, 2017 Nine Months Ended September 30, 2016
 Average Balance Income/Expense Yield/ Rate Average Balance Income/ Expense Yield/Rate
 (Dollars in Thousands)
Assets:           
Interest earning assets:           
Loans (1) (2) (3)$60,166,823
 $1,859,740
 4.13% $61,867,590
 $1,727,822
 3.73%
Investment securities – AFS (tax exempt) (3)
4,014
 243
 8.09
 11,483
 668
 7.77
Investment securities – AFS (taxable)12,078,924
 164,240
 1.82
 11,246,517
 130,585
 1.55
Total investment securities – AFS12,082,938
 164,483
 1.82
 11,258,000
 131,253
 1.56
Investment securities – HTM (tax exempt) (3)974,886
 26,264
 3.60
 1,070,547
 25,977
 3.24
Investment securities – HTM (taxable)167,008
 3,356
 2.69
 198,614
 3,316
 2.23
Total investment securities - HTM1,141,894
 29,620
 3.47
 1,269,161
 29,293
 3.08
Trading account securities (3)2,235,621
 26,352
 1.58
 3,786,156
 40,661
 1.43
Other (4) (5) (6)2,402,511
 32,868
 1.83
 3,849,093
 13,275
 0.46
Total earning assets78,029,787
 2,113,063
 3.62
 82,030,000
 1,942,304
 3.16
Noninterest earning assets:           
Cash and due from banks (6)918,124
     1,274,687
    
Allowance for loan losses(835,915)     (823,372)    
Net unrealized (loss) gain on investment securities available for sale(102,461)     15,061
    
Other noninterest earning assets9,472,821
     9,382,051
    
Total assets$87,482,356
     $91,878,427
    
Liabilities:           
Interest bearing liabilities:           
Interest bearing demand deposits$7,863,401
 19,211
 0.33
 $6,912,147
 11,867
 0.23
Savings and money market accounts24,826,554
 72,643
 0.39
 25,861,764
 75,896
 0.39
Certificates and other time deposits12,554,506
 119,447
 1.27
 14,652,400
 142,856
 1.30
Foreign office deposits
 
 
 108,444
 160
 0.20
Total interest bearing deposits45,244,461
 211,301
 0.62
 47,534,755
 230,779
 0.65
FHLB and other borrowings4,115,511
 71,422
 2.32
 4,543,350
 58,919
 1.73
Federal funds purchased and securities sold under agreements to repurchase (5)64,676
 16,462
 34.03
 569,772
 16,525
 3.87
Other short-term borrowings2,239,427
 24,233
 1.45
 3,912,069
 41,281
 1.41
Total interest bearing liabilities51,664,075
 323,418
 0.84
 56,559,946
 347,504
 0.82
Noninterest bearing deposits20,922,150
     20,432,380
    
Other noninterest bearing liabilities1,899,015
     2,122,640
    
Total liabilities74,485,240
     79,114,966
    
Shareholder’s equity12,997,116
     12,763,461
    
Total liabilities and shareholder’s equity$87,482,356
     $91,878,427
    
Net interest income/net interest spread  $1,789,645
 2.78%   $1,594,800
 2.34%
Net interest margin    3.07%     2.60%
Taxable equivalent adjustment  63,023
     58,871
  
Net interest income  $1,726,622
     $1,535,929
  
(1)Loans include loans held for sale and nonaccrual loans.
(2)Interest income includes loan fees for rate calculation purposes.
(3)Yields are stated on a fully taxable equivalent basis assuming the tax rate in effect for each period presented.
(4)Includes federal funds sold, securities purchased under agreements to resell, interest bearing deposits, and other earning assets.
(5)Yield/rate reflects impact of balance sheet offsetting. See Note 6, Securities Financing Activities, in the notes to the financial statements.
(6)Beginning in the fourth quarter of 2016, interest bearing deposits with the Federal Reserve are included in earning assets. Previous to this change, these balances were included as noninterest earning assets within cash and due from banks. Prior periods have been reclassified to conform to current period presentation.

Provision for Loan Losses
The provision for loan losses is the charge to earnings that management determines to be necessary to maintain the allowance for loan losses at a sufficient level reflecting management's estimate of probable incurred losses in the loan portfolio.
Three Months Ended September 30, 2017March 31, 2019 and 20162018
For the three months ended September 30, 2017,March 31, 2019, the Company recorded $103.4$182.3 million of provision for loan losses compared to $65.1$57.0 million offor the three months ended March 31, 2018. The increase in provision for loan losses for the three months ended September 30, 2016. TheMarch 31, 2019 was primarily attributable to higher losses within the consumer direct loan portfolio as well as an increase in provision for loan losses was primarily due to $60 million of additionalthe allowance for loan losses related toon individually evaluated nonperforming loans in the estimated impact of Hurricanes Harveycommercial, financial and Irma on theagricultural loan portfolio during the three months ended September 30, 2017 offset in part by a reduction in provision expense associated with improvements in credit quality indicators in the energy portfolio during the three months ended September 30, 2017.March 31, 2019.
The Company recorded net charge-offs of $71.3$101.5 million during the three months ended September 30, 2017March 31, 2019 compared to $46.1$67.7 million during the corresponding period in 2016.2018. The increase in net charge-offs for the three months ended September 30, 2017March 31, 2019, as compared to the corresponding period in 20162018, was primarily driven in part by an $8.1 million increase in commercial real estate-mortgage net charge-offs, a $5.8 million increase in commercial, financial and agricultural net charge-offs and a $5.4$28.5 million increase in consumer direct net charge-offs. Included in net-charge-offs for the three months ended September 30, 2017 was $127 thousand of net charge-offs related to energy loans compared to $8.5 million of charge-offs related to energy loans for the three months ended September 30, 2016.
Net charge-offs were 0.47% (or 0.49% excluding net charge-offs on energy loans)0.63% of average loans for the three months ended September 30, 2017March 31, 2019 compared to 0.30% (or 0.26% excluding net charge-offs on energy loans)0.44% of average loans for the three months ended September 30, 2016.
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2017 and 2016
For the nine months ended September 30, 2017, the Company recorded $228.9 million of provision for loan losses compared to $265.0 million of provision for loan losses for the nine months ended September 30, 2016. The decrease in provision for loan losses was primarily due to improvements in credit quality indicators in the energy portfolio during the nine months ended September 30, 2017, when compared to the negative credit quality indicators stemming from downgrades in the energy portfolio that occurred during the nine months ended September 30, 2016 offset by the impact of $60 million of additional allowance for loan losses related to the estimated impact of Hurricanes Harvey and Irma on the loan portfolio during the nine months ended September 30, 2017.
The Company recorded net charge-offs of $218.0 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2017 compared to $165.6 million during the corresponding period in 2016. The increase in net charge-offs for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 as compared to the corresponding period in 2016 was driven, in part, by a $15.4 million increase in commercial, financial and agricultural net charge-offs as well as a $20.5 million increase in consumer direct net charge-offs. Included in net-charge-offs for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 was $56.7 million of net charge-offs related to energy loans compared to $49.4 million of charge-offs related to energy loans for the nine months ended September 30, 2016. Net charge-offs were 0.48% (or 0.38% excluding net charge-offs on energy loans) of average loans for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 compared to 0.36% (or 0.27% excluding net charge-offs on energy loans) of average loans for the nine months ended September 30, 2016.March 31, 2018.
For further discussion and analysis of the allowance for loan losses, refer to the discussion of lending activities found later in this section. Also, refer to Note 3, Loans and Allowance for Loan Losses, in the Notes to the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for additional disclosures.

Noninterest Income
The following table presents the components of noninterest income.
Table 2
Noninterest Income
Table 2
Noninterest Income
Table 2
Noninterest Income
Three Months Ended September 30, Nine Months Ended 
 September 30,
Three Months Ended March 31,
2017 2016 2017 20162019 2018
(In Thousands)(In Thousands)
Service charges on deposit accounts$55,953
 $55,047
 $166,040
 $158,393
$58,908
 $56,161
Card and merchant processing fees32,297
 31,256
 94,749
 92,507
46,002
 39,678
Retail investment sales26,817
 30,137
 82,876
 79,689
Investment services sales fees26,696
 30,108
Money transfer income21,981
 20,688
Investment banking and advisory fees30,500
 34,385
 78,744
 86,324
18,857
 23,896
Money transfer income24,881
 25,058
 77,408
 75,960
Asset management fees10,336
 8,778
 30,162
 25,969
10,767
 10,770
Corporate and correspondent investment sales5,145
 6,974
 26,249
 21,490
6,892
 12,056
Mortgage banking3,450
 8,242
 9,636
 5,410
4,937
 8,397
Bank owned life insurance4,322
 4,170
 12,711
 13,041
4,584
 4,215
Investment securities gains, net3,033
 
 3,033
 30,037
8,958
 
Other61,060
 59,718
 167,198
 206,396
49,178
 51,856
Total noninterest income$257,794
 $263,765
 $748,806
 $795,216
$257,760
 $257,825
Three Months Ended September 30, 2017March 31, 2019 and 20162018
Noninterest income was $257.8 million for both the three months ended September 30, 2017, comparedMarch 31, 2019 and 2018.
Card and merchant processing fees represents income related to $263.8customers' utilization of their debt and credit cards, as well as interchange income and merchants' discounts. Income from card and merchant processing fees increased to $46.0 million for the three months ended September 30, 2016. The decreaseMarch 31, 2019, compared to $39.7 million for the three months ended March 31, 2018. Contributing to this increase was a $4.7 million increase in noninterestinterchange income was primarily driven by decreasesrelated to growth in retail investment sales, investment banking and advisory fees and mortgage banking partially offset bythe number of accounts as well as an increase in investment securities gains.current customers' spending volumes.
Retail investment
Investment services sales fees is comprised of mutual fundsfund and annuity sales income and insurance sales fees. Income from retail investment services sales fees decreased to $26.8$26.7 million for the three months ended September 30, 2017,March 31, 2019, compared to $30.1 million for the three months ended September 30, 2016,March 31, 2018, due to a decrease of $4.5$5.7 million in fixed annuity income,securities transaction fees partially offset by an increase of $1.1$1.8 million in variable annuity income. The improved market conditions caused a shift in demandrelated to life and disability insurance fees.
Investment banking and advisory fees primarily represent income from fixed annuities towards variable annuities.
BSI. Income from investment banking and advisory fees decreased to $30.5$18.9 million for the three months ended September 30, 2017,March 31, 2019, compared to $34.4$23.9 million for the three months ended September 30, 2016, due toMarch 31, 2018. The primary driver of this decrease was a decreasedecline in the volume of bond underwriting activity during the third quarter 2017three months ended March 31, 2019 compared to the same period in 2016.
Asset management fees are fees generated from money management transactions executed with the Company through trusts, higher net worth customers and other long-term clients. Asset management fees for the three months ended September 30, 2017, increased to $10.3 million, from $8.8 million for the three months ended September 30, 2016, due primarily to an increase in assets under management compared to the same period in 2016.2018.
Corporate and correspondent investment sales represents income generated through the sales of interest rate protection contracts to corporate customers and the sale of bonds and other services to the Company's correspondent banking clients. Income from corporate and correspondent investment sales decreased to $5.1$6.9 million for the three months ended September 30, 2017,March 31, 2019, compared to $7.0$12.1 million for the three months ended September 30, 2016,March 31, 2018. The decrease was primarily driven by a decline in customer interest rate swap income due to a decrease in bond trading duringinterest rate contract sales as well as valuation adjustments on interest rate contracts for the three months ended September 30, 2017.March 31, 2019 compared to the same period in 2018.
Mortgage banking for the three months ended September 30, 2017March 31, 2019 was $3.5$4.9 million, a decrease of $4.8$3.5 million compared to the three months ended September 30, 2016.March 31, 2018. Mortgage banking for the three months ended September 30, 2017,March 31, 2019, included $6.5$6.8 million of originationservicing income, guarantee fees and gains on sales of mortgage loans partially offset by net losses of $2.7$1.9 million related to fair value adjustments on mortgage loans held for sale, mortgage related derivatives and MSRs. Mortgage banking for the three months ended September 30, 2016,March 31, 2018, included $7.2$8.3 million of originationservicing income, guarantee fees

and gains on sales of mortgage loans andas well as net gains of $986$405 thousand related to fair value adjustments on mortgage loans held for sale, mortgage related derivatives and MSRs. The decrease in mortgage banking for the three months ended September 30, 2017, compared to the corresponding periodincome was driven in 2016 was primarily drivenpart by a slightdecrease in the valuation related to MSRs due to a decline in interest rates during the third quarter of 2017 which negatively impacted the valuations ofas well as decreased mortgage loans held for sale, mortgage related derivatives, and MSRs. In addition, mortgage production volume decreased during the three months ended September 30, 2017, compared to the corresponding period in 2016.loan sales volume.
Investment securities gains, net increased by $3.0were $9.0 million for the three months ended September 30, 2017, due to the sale of AFS securities during the three months ended September 30, 2017.March 31, 2019. See, "—Investment Securities"“—Debt Securities” for more information related to the investmentdebt securities sales.
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2017 and 2016
Noninterest income was $748.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2017, compared to $795.2 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2016. The decrease in noninterest income was primarily driven by decreases in investment securities gains, investment banking and advisory fees and other noninterest income partially offset by increases in asset management fees, corporate and correspondent investment sales and mortgage banking.
Asset management fees for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 was $30.2 million, compared to $26.0 million the nine months ended September 30, 2016, due primarily to an increase in assets under management compared to the same period in 2016.
Income from corporate and correspondent investment sales increased to $26.2 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2017, from $21.5 million for the corresponding period in 2016. The $4.8 million increase was due in part to income related to an increase in interest rate contracts and foreign currency exchange contracts.
Mortgage banking for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 was $9.6 million, an increase of $4.2 million compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2016. Mortgage banking for the nine months ended September 30, 2017, included $18.3 million of origination fees and gains on sales of mortgage loans partially offset by net losses of $8.5 million related to fair value adjustments on mortgage loans held for sale, mortgage related derivatives and MSRs. Mortgage banking for the nine months ended September 30, 2016, included $17.2 million of origination fees and gains on sales of mortgage loans partially offset by net losses of $11.9 million related to fair value adjustments on mortgage loans held for sale, mortgage related derivatives and MSRs. The increase in mortgage banking for the nine months ended September 30, 2017, compared to the corresponding period in 2016 was primarily driven by a decline in rates during 2016, which negatively impacted the valuations of mortgage loans held for sale, mortgage related derivatives, and MSRs.
Investment securities gains, net decreased to $3.0 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2017, compared to $30.0 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2017. See "—Investment Securities" for more information related to the investment securities sales.
Other income is comprised of income recognized that does not typically fit into one of the other noninterest income categories and includes various fees associated with letters of credit, syndications, ATMs and foreign exchange. For the nine months ended September 30, 2017, other income decreased by $39.2 million due in part to a $17.7 million residual value write down related to a commercial lease and a $16.1 million gain recognized during 2016 from the sale of loans not initially originated for sale in the secondary market.

Noninterest Expense
The following table presents the components of noninterest expense.
Table 3
Noninterest Expense
Table 3
Noninterest Expense
Table 3
Noninterest Expense
Three Months Ended September 30, Nine Months Ended 
 September 30,
Three Months Ended March 31,
2017 2016 2017 20162019 2018
(In Thousands)(In Thousands)
Salaries, benefits and commissions$279,384
 $279,132
 $835,825
 $836,067
$292,716
 $289,440
Equipment60,656
 59,697
 184,691
 179,646
65,394
 63,360
Professional services64,775
 63,628
 187,422
 178,396
63,896
 60,645
Net occupancy42,227
 41,610
 125,568
 120,881
40,941
 40,422
Money transfer expense15,938
 16,680
 50,069
 50,048
14,978
 13,721
Amortization of intangibles2,525
 4,093
 7,575
 12,280
Total securities impairment
 
 242
 130

 309
Other108,457
 91,431
 304,367
 312,004
104,048
 95,016
Total noninterest expense$573,962
 $556,271
 $1,695,759
 $1,689,452
$581,973
 $562,913
Three Months Ended September 30, 2017March 31, 2019 and 20162018
Noninterest expense was $574.0$582.0 million for the three months ended September 30, 2017,March 31, 2019, an increase of $17.7$19.1 million compared to $556.3$562.9 million for the three months ended September 30, 2016.March 31, 2018. The increase was driven by higher levels ofincreases in equipment, professional services, money transfer expense and other noninterest expense.

Equipment expense offset,increased by $2.0 million during the three months ended March 31, 2019, to $65.4 million compared to $63.4 million for the corresponding period in part,2018 primarily due to a $3.1 million increase in software maintenance and software amortization partially offset by a $1.1 million decrease in amortization of intangibles.depreciation expense.
AmortizationProfessional services represents fees incurred for the various support functions, which includes legal, consulting, outsourcing and other professional related fees. Professional services increased $3.3 million during the three months ended March 31, 2019, to $63.9 million compared to $60.6 million for the corresponding period in 2018 due to a $1.3 million increase in outsourcing and a $1.7 million increase in services related to credit reporting and credit card processing.
Money transfer expense decreased by $1.6increased to $15.0 million during the three months ended March 31, 2019 compared to $13.7 million for the three months ended September 30, 2017, due to the lower level of intangible assets at September 30, 2017, compared to the same periodMarch 31, 2018 driven by an increase in 2016.transaction volumes during 2019.
Other noninterest expense includes FDIC insurance, marketing, communications, postage, supplies, subscriptions, FDIC indemnification expense, provision for unfunded commitments and gains and losses on the sales and write-downs of OREO. Other noninterest expense increased $17.0$9.0 million during the three months ended September 30, 2017,March 31, 2019, to $108.5$104.0 million compared to $91.4$95.0 million for the three months ended September 30, 2016.March 31, 2018. The primary driver of the increase was primarily attributabledue to a $9.5$5.2 million increase in the provision for unfunded commitments and letters of credit in 20172019 compared to the corresponding period in 2016 as well as a $3.3 million increase in business development expenses in 2017 compared to the corresponding period in 2016.2018.
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2017 and 2016
Noninterest expense was $1.7 billion for both the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016.
Professional services increased $9.0 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2017, to $187.4 million compared to $178.4 million for the corresponding period in 2016 due to increases of $5.0 million, $4.5 million and $3.6 million related to contractor services, consulting and bankcard fees, respectively, which were partially offset by a decrease of $6.4 million related to credit card processing.
Other noninterest expense decreased $7.6 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2017, to $304.4 million compared to $312.0 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2016. The decrease was primarily attributable to an $11.1 million decrease in the provision for unfunded commitments and letters of credit in 2017 compared to the corresponding period in 2016 offset in part by a $6.7 million increase in marketing expense in 2017 compared to the corresponding period in 2016.

Income Tax Expense
Three Months Ended September 30, 2017March 31, 2019 and 20162018
The Company’s income tax expense totaled $39.3$35.6 million and $36.8$51.8 million for the three months ended September 30, 2017March 31, 2019 and 2016,2018, respectively. The effective tax rate was 23.2%20.2% for the three months ended September 30, 2017March 31, 2019 and 23.4%19.9% for the three months ended September 30, 2016.
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2017 and 2016
The Company’s income tax expense totaled $142.1 million and $94.5 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively. The effective tax rate was 25.8% for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 25.1% for the nine months ended September 30, 2016.March 31, 2018.
Analysis of Financial Condition
A review of the Company’s major balance sheet categories is presented below.
Federal Funds Sold, Securities Purchased Under Agreements to Resell and Interest Bearing Deposits
Federal funds sold, securities purchased under agreements to resell and interest bearing deposits totaled $4.9 billion at March 31, 2019, compared to $2.1 billion December 31, 2018. The increase was driven by a $2.7 billion increase in interest bearing deposits with the Federal Reserve.
Trading Account Assets
Trading account assets totaled $572$306 million at September 30, 2017,March 31, 2019, compared to $3.1 billion$238 million December 31, 2016. The $2.6 billion decrease in trading account assets was primarily attributable to a $2.5 billion decrease in U.S. Treasury securities held by BSI.2018.
InvestmentDebt Securities
As of September 30, 2017,At March 31, 2019, the securities portfolio included $12.3$9.3 billion in available for sale debt securities and $1.1$4.6 billion in held to maturity debt securities for a total investmentdebt securities portfolio of $13.3$13.9 billion, an increase of $477$5 million compared with December 31, 2016.2018.
During the ninethree months ended September 30, 2017,March 31, 2019, the Company received proceeds of $210.9 million from$1.4 billion related to the sale of U.S. Treasury securities and other U.S. government agenciesagency mortgage-backed securities classified as available for sale which resulted in a net gainsgain of $3.0$9.0 million. During the nine months ended September 30, 2016, theThe Company received proceeds ofalso purchased approximately $1.8 billion from the sale of U.S. Treasury and other U.S. government agencies securities that were classified as available for sale which resulted in net gains of $30.0 million.held to maturity.
Lending Activities
The Company groups its loans into portfolio segments based on internal classifications reflecting the manner in which the allowance for loan losses is established and how credit risk is measured, monitored and reported. Commercial loans are comprised of commercial, financial and agricultural, real estate — construction, and commercial real estate–mortgage loans. Consumer loans are comprised of residential real estate — mortgage, equity lines of credit, equity loans, credit cards, consumer direct and consumer indirect loans.
The Company also had a portfolio of covered loans that were acquired in the 2009 FDIC-assisted acquisition of certain assets and liabilities of Guaranty Bank. Covered loans represent loans acquired from the FDIC subject to loss sharing agreements. The loss sharing agreements provide for FDIC loss sharing for five years for commercial loans and 10 years for single family residential loans. The loss sharing agreement for commercial loans expired in the fourth quarter of 2014. In July 2017, the Company entered into an agreement with the FDIC to terminate the Company's single family residential loss share agreement ahead of the contractual maturity.

The following table presents the composition of the loan portfolio.
Table 4
Loan Portfolio
Table 4
Loan Portfolio
Table 4
Loan Portfolio
September 30, 2017 December 31, 2016March 31, 2019 December 31, 2018
(In Thousands)(In Thousands)
Commercial loans:      
Commercial, financial and agricultural$25,091,942
 $25,122,002
$25,281,930
 $26,562,319
Real estate – construction2,247,144
 2,125,316
1,945,347
 1,997,537
Commercial real estate – mortgage11,342,378
 11,210,660
12,955,196
 13,016,796
Total commercial loans$38,681,464
 $38,457,978
$40,182,473
 $41,576,652
Consumer loans:      
Residential real estate – mortgage$13,398,503
 $13,259,994
$13,396,396
 $13,422,156
Equity lines of credit2,617,312
 2,543,778
2,716,307
 2,747,217
Equity loans383,376
 445,709
288,169
 298,614
Credit card590,975
 604,881
832,832
 818,308
Consumer direct1,604,396
 1,254,641
2,533,916
 2,553,588
Consumer indirect3,039,178
 3,134,948
3,807,452
 3,770,019
Total consumer loans$21,633,740
 $21,243,951
$23,575,072
 $23,609,902
Covered loans
 359,334
Total loans$60,315,204
 $60,061,263
$63,757,545
 $65,186,554
Loans held for sale77,783
 161,849
1,273,821
 68,766
Total loans and loans held for sale$60,392,987
 $60,223,112
$65,031,366
 $65,255,320
Loans and loans held for sale, net of unearned income, totaled $60.4$65.0 billion at September 30, 2017, an increaseMarch 31, 2019, a decrease of $170$224.0 million from December 31, 2016.2018. During the three months ended March 31, 2019, the Company transferred $1.2 billion of commercial loans to loans held for sale as the Company plans to sell these loans to BBVA, S.A. New York Branch.
See Note 3, Loans and Allowance for Loan Losses, and Note 4, Loan Sales and Servicing, in the Notes to the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for additional discussion.
Asset Quality
Nonperforming assets, which includes nonaccrual loans, nonaccrual loans held for sale, accruing loans 90 days past due, accruing TDRs 90 days past due, other real estate owned and other repossessed assets, totaled $744$897 million at September 30, 2017, a decreaseMarch 31, 2019, an increase of $268$57 million compared to $1.0 billion$840 million at December 31, 2016.2018. The decreaseincrease in nonperforming assets was primarily due to a $254$55 million decreaseincrease in nonaccrual loans driven by a $206$61 million decreaseincrease in energy nonaccrual loans. At September 30, 2017, energycommercial, financial and agricultural nonaccrual loans were $181 million comparedprimarily due to $387 million at December 31, 2016. The decreasefour unrelated commercial, financial and agricultural loans in the healthcare and energy sectors being placed on nonaccrual loans was due in part to sales of nonperforming energy loans during the nine months ended September 30, 2017. Excluding energy nonperforming loans, nonperforming assets totaled $563 million at September 30, 2017 compared to $625 million at December 31, 2016.status. As a percentage of total loans and loans held for sale, other real estate owned and other repossessed assets, nonperforming assets were 1.23% (or 0.98% excluding energy nonperforming loans)1.38% at September 30, 2017March 31, 2019 compared with 1.68% (or 1.10% excluding energy nonperforming loans)1.29% at December 31, 2016.

2018.
The Company defines potential problem loans as commercial loans rated substandard or doubtful that do not meet the definition of nonaccrual, TDR or 90 days past due and still accruing. See Note 3, Loans and Allowance for Loan Losses, in the Notes to the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for further information on the Company’s credit grade categories, which are derived from standard regulatory rating definitions. The following table provides a summary of potential problem loans.

Table 5
Potential Problem Loans
Table 5
Potential Problem Loans
Table 5
Potential Problem Loans
September 30, 2017 December 31, 2016March 31, 2019 December 31, 2018
(In Thousands)(In Thousands)
Commercial, financial and agricultural$558,549
 $630,760
$328,985
 $371,627
Real estate – construction3,114
 5,578
15,205
 12,791
Commercial real estate – mortgage68,964
 57,108
138,010
 74,737
$630,627
 $693,446
$482,200
 $459,155

The following table summarizes asset quality information and includes loans held for sale.
Table 6
Asset Quality
Table 6
Asset Quality
Table 6
Asset Quality
September 30, 2017 December 31, 2016March 31, 2019 December 31, 2018
(In Thousands)(In Thousands)
Nonaccrual loans:      
Commercial, financial and agricultural$324,071
 $596,454
$461,029
 $400,389
Real estate – construction1,877
 1,239
1,298
 2,851
Commercial real estate – mortgage108,040
 71,921
109,447
 110,144
Residential real estate – mortgage175,490
 140,303
163,463
 167,099
Equity lines of credit34,416
 33,453
34,999
 37,702
Equity loans11,305
 13,635
9,840
 10,939
Credit card
 

 
Consumer direct2,746
 789
4,725
 4,528
Consumer indirect8,867
 5,926
21,843
 17,834
Covered
 730
Total nonaccrual loans666,812
 864,450
806,644
 751,486
Nonaccrual loans held for sale
 56,592

 
Total nonaccrual loans and loans held for sale$666,812
 $921,042
$806,644
 $751,486
Accruing TDRs: (1)      
Commercial, financial and agricultural$1,259
 $8,726
$18,910
 $18,926
Real estate – construction106
 2,393
111
 116
Commercial real estate – mortgage4,645
 4,860
3,811
 3,661
Residential real estate – mortgage59,086
 59,893
59,167
 57,446
Equity lines of credit237
 

 
Equity loans30,574
 34,746
26,188
 26,768
Credit card
 

 
Consumer direct577
 704
3,854
 2,684
Consumer indirect
 

 
Covered
 
Total Accruing TDRs96,484
 111,322
112,041
 109,601
Accruing TDRs classified as loans held for sale
 

 
Total Accruing TDRs (loans and loans held for sale)$96,484
 $111,322
$112,041
 $109,601
Loans 90 days past due and accruing:      
Commercial, financial and agricultural$6,072
 $2,891
$8,144
 $8,114
Real estate – construction2,955
 2,007
533
 544
Commercial real estate – mortgage3,686
 
1,160
 2,420
Residential real estate – mortgage2,558
 3,356
9,007
 5,927
Equity lines of credit2,179
 2,950
1,471
 2,226
Equity loans840
 467
34
 180
Credit card10,692
 10,954
18,499
 17,011
Consumer direct5,209
 4,482
17,251
 13,336
Consumer indirect8,858
 7,197
7,781
 9,791
Covered
 27,238
Total loans 90 days past due and accruing43,049
 61,542
63,880
 59,549
Loans held for sale 90 days past due and accruing
 

 
Total loans and loans held for sale 90 days past due and accruing$43,049
 $61,542
$63,880
 $59,549
OREO$22,012
 $21,112
$14,983
 $16,869
Other repossessed assets$11,443
 $7,587
$11,225
 $12,031
(1)
TDR totals include accruing loans 90 days past due classified as TDR.

Nonperforming assets, which include loans held for sale, are detailed in the following table.tables.
Table 7
Nonperforming Assets
Table 7
Nonperforming Assets
Table 7
Nonperforming Assets
September 30, 2017 December 31, 2016March 31, 2019 December 31, 2018
(In Thousands)(In Thousands)
Nonaccrual loans$666,812
 $921,042
$806,644
 $751,486
Loans 90 days or more past due and accruing (1)43,049
 61,542
63,880
 59,549
TDRs 90 days or more past due and accruing963
 589
370
 411
Nonperforming loans710,824
 983,173
870,894
 811,446
OREO22,012
 21,112
14,983
 16,869
Other repossessed assets11,443
 7,587
11,225
 12,031
Total nonperforming assets$744,279
 $1,011,872
$897,102
 $840,346
(1)Excludes loans classified as TDR.
Table 8
Asset Quality Ratios
Table 8
Asset Quality Ratios
Table 8
Asset Quality Ratios
September 30, 2017 December 31, 2016March 31, 2019 December 31, 2018
Asset Quality Ratios:      
Nonperforming loans and loans held for sale as a percentage of loans and loans held for sale (1)1.18% 1.63%1.34% 1.24%
Nonperforming assets as a percentage of total loans and loans held for sale, other real estate owned, and other repossessed assets (2)1.23
 1.68
1.38
 1.29
Allowance for loan losses as a percentage of loans1.41
 1.40
1.52
 1.36
Allowance for loan losses as a percentage of nonperforming loans (3)119.46
 90.47
110.92
 109.09
(1)Nonperforming loans include nonaccrual loans and loans held for sale (including nonaccrual loans classified as TDR), accruing loans 90 days past due and accruing TDRs 90 days past due.
(2)Nonperforming assets include nonperforming loans, other real estate owned and other repossessed assets.
(3)
Nonperforming loans include nonaccrual loans (including nonaccrual loans classified as TDR), accruing loans 90 days past due and accruing TDRs 90 days past due.
The following table provides a rollforward of nonaccrual loans and loans held for sale, excluding covered loans.sale.
Table 9
Rollforward of Nonaccrual Loans
Table 9
Rollforward of Nonaccrual Loans
Table 9
Rollforward of Nonaccrual Loans
Nine Months Ended September 30,Three Months Ended March 31,
2017 20162019 2018
(In Thousands)(In Thousands)
Balance at beginning of period,$920,312
 $406,911
$751,486
 $658,865
Additions487,329
 1,270,646
227,190
 148,155
Returns to accrual(49,458) (43,492)(37,819) (25,073)
Loan sales(98,797) (104,372)
 (8,475)
Payments and paydowns(290,722) (216,754)(17,758) (49,229)
Transfers to OREO(24,480) (16,415)(5,984) (4,576)
Charge-offs(277,372) (210,775)(110,471) (72,457)
Balance at end of period$666,812
 $1,085,749
$806,644
 $647,210
When borrowers are experiencing financial difficulties, the Company, in order to assist the borrowers in repaying the principal and interest owed to the Company, may make certain modifications to the loan agreement. To facilitate this process, a concessionary modification that would not otherwise be considered may be granted resulting in a classification of the loan as a TDR. Within each of the Company’s loan classes, TDRs typically involve modification of the loan interest rate to a below market rate or an extension or deferment of the loan term. The financial effects of TDRs are reflected in the components that comprise the allowance for loan losses in either the amount of charge-offs or loan loss provision and period-end allowance levels. All TDRs are considered to be impaired loans. Refer to Note

3, Loans and Allowance for Loan Losses, in the Notes to the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information.
The following table provides a rollforward of TDR activity, excluding covered loans and loans held for sale.
Table 10
Rollforward of TDR Activity
Table 10
Rollforward of TDR Activity
Table 10
Rollforward of TDR Activity
Nine Months Ended September 30,Three Months Ended March 31,
2017 20162019 2018
(In Thousands)(In Thousands)
Balance at beginning period$213,868
 $227,817
$311,442
 $285,606
New TDRs217,600
 54,004
20,498
 7,295
Payments/Payoffs(123,460) (58,990)(15,719) (7,725)
Charge-offs(4,526) (1,428)(460) (4,173)
Transfer to OREO(448) (615)
 
Balance at end of period$303,034
 $220,788
$315,761
 $281,003
The Company’s aggregate recorded investment in impaired loans modified through TDRs excluding covered loans was $303$316 million at September 30, 2017March 31, 2019 compared to $214$311 million at December 31, 2016. The increase in TDRs was due to an increase in commercial, financial and agricultural TDRs, primarily associated with energy loans.2018. Included in these amounts are $96$112 million at September 30, 2017March 31, 2019 and $111$110 million at December 31, 20162018 of accruing TDRs, excluding covered loans.TDRs. Accruing TDRs are not considered nonperforming because they are performing in accordance with the restructured terms.
Allowance for Loan Losses
Management’s policy is to maintain the allowance for loan losses at a level sufficient to absorb estimated probable incurred losses in the loan portfolio. See Note 3, Loans and Allowance for Loan Losses, in the Notes to the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for additional disclosures regarding the allowance for loan losses. The total allowance for loan losses increased to $849$966 million at September 30, 2017,March 31, 2019, from $838$885 million at December 31, 2016.2018. The ratio of the allowance for loan losses to total loans was 1.41%1.52% at September 30, 2017March 31, 2019 compared to 1.40%1.36% at December 31, 2016.2018. Nonperforming loans were $711$871 million at September 30, 2017March 31, 2019 compared to $983$811 million at December 31, 2016.2018. The allowance attributable to individually impaired loans was $108$152 million at September 30, 2017March 31, 2019 compared to $138$107 million at December 31, 2016.2018. The increase was driven by the increase in nonperforming loans as well as updated impairment analysis. Loans individually evaluated for impairment may have no allowance recorded if the fair value of the collateral less costs to sell or the present value of the loan's expected future cash flows exceeds the recorded investment of the loan.
Net charge-offs were 0.47%0.63% of average loans for the three months ended September 30, 2017March 31, 2019 compared to 0.30%0.44% of average loans for the three months ended September 30, 2016.March 31, 2018. The increase in net charge-offs for the three months ended September 30, 2017March 31, 2019 as compared to the corresponding period in 20162018 was driven in part by an $8.1 million increase in commercial real estate-mortgage net charge-offs,primarily due to a $5.8 million increase in commercial, financial and agricultural net charge-offs and a $5.4$28.5 million increase in consumer direct net charge-offs. Commercial, financial and agricultural net charge-offs include $127 thousand of net charge-offs related to energy loans for the three months ended September 30, 2017 compared to $8.5 million of net charge-offs related to energy loans for the three months ended September 30, 2016.
Net charge-offs were 0.48% of average loans for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 compared to 0.36% of average loans for the nine months ended September 30, 2016. The increase in net charge-offs for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 as compared to the corresponding period in 2016 was driven, in part, by a $15.4 million increase in commercial, financial and agricultural net charge-offs as well as a $20.5 million increase in consumer direct net charge-offs. Commercial, financial and agricultural net charge-offs include $56.7 million of net charge-offs related to energy loans for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 compared to $49.4 million of net charge-offs related to energy loans for the nine months ended September 30, 2016.

The following table sets forth information with respect to the Company’s loans, excluding loans held for sale, and the allowance for loan losses.
Table 11
Summary of Loan Loss Experience
Table 11
Summary of Loan Loss Experience
Table 11
Summary of Loan Loss Experience
Three Months Ended September 30, Nine Months Ended September 30,Three Months Ended March 31,
2017 2016 2017 20162019 2018
(Dollars in Thousands)(Dollars in Thousands)
Average loans outstanding during the period$60,215,551
 $60,977,920
 $60,111,031
 $61,786,243
$65,386,558
 $62,162,146
Allowance for loan losses, beginning of period$816,952
 $843,051
 $838,293
 $762,673
$885,242
 $842,760
Charge-offs:          
Commercial, financial and agricultural21,320
 13,702
 91,943
 66,541
9,503
 10,132
Real estate – construction
 21
 82
 306
19
 30
Commercial real estate – mortgage7,913
 83
 8,845
 3,249
6
 173
Residential real estate – mortgage2,587
 2,043
 8,769
 6,148
1,446
 2,137
Equity lines of credit1,314
 2,141
 5,054
 7,259
3,238
 1,674
Equity loans389
 424
 2,419
 1,665
328
 771
Credit card11,333
 9,171
 33,479
 27,000
16,942
 10,844
Consumer direct19,940
 13,975
 57,030
 34,524
59,131
 27,555
Consumer indirect23,829
 23,326
 69,752
 64,083
36,800
 29,985
Covered
 
 
 1,565
Total charge-offs88,625
 64,886
 277,373
 212,340
127,413
 83,301
Recoveries:          
Commercial, financial and agricultural6,625
 4,766
 17,790
 7,775
4,760
 1,737
Real estate – construction29
 227
 965
 1,908
1,429
 119
Commercial real estate – mortgage206
 455
 3,265
 1,915
33
 59
Residential real estate – mortgage870
 1,483
 4,453
 4,156
517
 757
Equity lines of credit1,135
 1,540
 2,914
 3,589
2,663
 1,514
Equity loans396
 406
 1,369
 1,060
409
 840
Credit card742
 711
 2,392
 2,223
1,699
 970
Consumer direct1,659
 1,091
 5,032
 3,005
5,257
 2,143
Consumer indirect5,696
 8,129
 21,130
 21,090
9,134
 7,444
Covered
 
 31
 1
Total recoveries17,358
 18,808
 59,341
 46,722
25,901
 15,583
Net charge-offs71,267
 46,078
 218,032
 165,618
101,512
 67,718
Total provision for loan losses103,434
 65,107
 228,858
 265,025
182,292
 57,029
Allowance for loan losses, end of period$849,119
 $862,080
 $849,119
 $862,080
$966,022
 $832,071
Net charge-offs to average loans0.47% 0.30% 0.48% 0.36%0.63% 0.44%
Concentrations
The following tables provide further details regarding the Company’s commercial, financial and agricultural, commercial real estate, residential real estate and consumer portfolio segments as of September 30, 2017March 31, 2019 and December 31, 2016.2018.
Commercial, Financial and Agricultural
In accordance with the Company's lending policy, each commercial loan undergoes a detailed underwriting process, which incorporates the Company's risk tolerance, credit policy and procedures. In addition, the Company has a graduated approval process which accounts for the quality, loan type and total exposure of the borrower. The Company has also adopted an internal exposure-based limit which is based on a variety of risk factors, including but not limited to the borrower industry.
The commercial, financial and agricultural portfolio segment totaled $25.1$25.3 billion at both September 30, 2017 andMarch 31, 2019 compared to $26.6 billion at December 31, 2016.2018. This segment consists primarily of large national and international companies and small to mid-sized companies. This portfolio segment also contains owner occupied commercial real estate loans. Loans in this

portfolio are generally underwritten individually and are secured with the assets of the company, and/or the personal guarantees of the business owners. The Company minimizes the risk associated with this portfolio segment

by various means, including maintaining prudent advance rates, financial covenants, and obtaining personal guarantees from the principals of the borrower.
The following table provides details related to the commercial, financial, and agricultural portfolio segment.
Table 12
Commercial, Financial and Agricultural
Table 12
Commercial, Financial and Agricultural
Table 12
Commercial, Financial and Agricultural
 September 30, 2017 December 31, 2016 (1) March 31, 2019 December 31, 2018 (1)
Industry Recorded Investment Nonaccrual Accruing TDRs Accruing Greater Than 90 Days Past Due Recorded Investment Nonaccrual Accruing TDRs Accruing Greater Than 90 Days Past Due Recorded Investment Nonaccrual Accruing TDRs Accruing Greater Than 90 Days Past Due Recorded Investment Nonaccrual Accruing TDRs Accruing Greater Than 90 Days Past Due
 (In Thousands) (In Thousands)
Autos, Components and Durable Goods $488,240
 $26
 $
 $
 $579,864
 $40
 $
 $57
 $2,255,972
 $46,537
 $
 $
 $2,403,917
 $68,891
 $
 $3,922
Basic Materials 637,602
 56
 
 
 740,247
 12,388
 
 
 574,570
 2,324
 
 660
 567,966
 2,426
 
 
Capital Goods & Industrial Services 2,722,652
 9,054
 149
 188
 2,580,976
 645
 174
 
 2,570,169
 75,048
 117
 87
 2,523,857
 74,769
 124
 39
Construction & Infrastructure 605,639
 39,609
 11
 
 550,282
 33,992
 29
 
Consumer & Healthcare 3,348,282
 9,822
 902
 357
 3,169,897
 3,363
 374
 56
Construction & Construction Materials 785,030
 20,347
 
 
 732,838
 19,971
 
 
Consumer 592,320
 682
 
 
 592,607
 600
 
 
Healthcare 2,830,302
 54,977
 328
 
 2,914,464
 18,682
 333
 83
Energy 2,952,237
 181,005
 
 
 3,246,189
 386,544
 
 
 2,836,518
 161,864
 
 
 2,863,529
 119,069
 
 
Financial Services 1,107,967
 69
 
 
 1,234,469
 115
 
 
 950,487
 84
 
 470
 1,061,922
 94
 
 
General Corporates 1,568,970
 5,611
 28
 4,540
 2,145,350
 80,606
 54
 2,684
 1,686,344
 4,211
 
 6,033
 1,757,121
 4,645
 3
 3,993
Institutions 2,717,842
 1,897
 
 
 2,368,603
 1,650
 7,868
 74
 3,031,525
 467
 
 
 3,349,248
 474
 
 
Leisure 2,354,338
 10,219
 120
 
 2,013,522
 8,458
 170
 
Leisure and Consumer Services 2,475,633
 24,615
 
 
 2,597,598
 22,544
 
 10
Real Estate 951,810
 505
 
 
 1,045,810
 
 
 
 1,326,247
 230
 
 
 1,533,206
 248
 
 
Retail & Wholesale Trade 2,694,278
 6,706
 49
 681
 2,407,291
 30,460
 
 
Retail 560,758
 33,192
 
 894
 573,658
 29,751
 
 67
Telecoms, Technology & Media 1,493,008
 3,480
 
 306
 1,521,981
 2,234
 53
 20
 1,363,926
 3,338
 45
 
 1,525,730
 3,680
 46
 
Transportation 867,528
 36,846
 
 
 792,672
 11,384
 
 
 899,832
 33,113
 
 
 1,000,564
 34,545
 
 
Utilities 581,549
 19,166
 
 
 724,849
 24,575
 4
 
 542,297
 
 18,420
 
 564,094
 
 18,420
 
Total Commercial, Financial and Agricultural $25,091,942
 $324,071
 $1,259
 $6,072
 $25,122,002
 $596,454
 $8,726
 $2,891
 $25,281,930
 $461,029
 $18,910
 $8,144
 $26,562,319
 $400,389
 $18,926
 $8,114
(1)December 31, 20162018 data has been revised to conform to current period industry classifications, as the Company redefined industry classifications during the secondfirst quarter of 2017.2019.


The Company has been closely monitoring its energy sector lending portfolio which was negatively impacted by the lower level of oil prices which began in mid-2014. Total energy exposure, including unused commitments to extend credit and letters of credit was $7.7 billion and $8.1 billion at September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively. As shown in Table 13, the Company's energy sector loan balances at September 30, 2017, were approximately $3.0 billion and represented 4.9% of the Company's total loans compared to $3.2 billion and 5.4% of the Company's total loans as of December 31, 2016. This amount is comprised of loans directly related to energy, such as exploration and production, pipeline transportation of natural gas, crude oil and other refined petroleum products, oil field services, and refining and support as detailed in the following table.
Table 13
Energy Portfolio
  September 30, 2017 December 31, 2016
  Recorded Investment Total Commitment Nonaccrual Recorded Investment Total Commitment Nonaccrual
  (In Thousands)
Exploration and production $1,630,303
 4,080,635
 $178,449
 $1,654,565
 $4,182,861
 $308,096
Midstream 976,845
 3,011,822
 
 1,199,844
 3,230,513
 11,298
Drilling oil and support services 179,636
 373,389
 2,350
 263,770
 467,908
 66,811
Refineries and terminals 165,453
 266,081
 205
 128,010
 262,618
 339
Other 
 
 
 
 
 
Total energy portfolio $2,952,237
 $7,731,927
 $181,004
 $3,246,189
 $8,143,900
 $386,544
  September 30, 2017 December 31, 2016
  As a % of Energy Loans As a % of Total Loans As a % of Energy Loans As a % of Total Loans
Exploration and production 55.2% 2.7% 51.0% 2.8%
Midstream 33.1
 1.6
 37.0
 2.0
Drilling oil and support services 6.1
 0.3
 8.1
 0.4
Refineries and terminals 5.6
 0.3
 3.9
 0.2
Other 
 
 
 
Total energy portfolio 100.0% 4.9% 100.0% 5.4%
The Company employs a variety of risk management strategies, including the use of concentration limits, underwriting standards and continuous monitoring. As of September 30, 2017, the Company has observed a decrease in total energy loans outstanding as well as a decrease in nonaccrual loans, as indicated in Table 13. The decrease in total exposure in the energy portfolio primarily reflects reduced borrowing bases resulting in a reduction in total commitments, while the decrease in recorded investment largely reflects energy customers taking actions to adjust their cash flows and reduce their levels of debt.
The overall level of loans rated special mention or lower, including loans classified as nonaccrual, in the energy portfolio at September 30, 2017 was 23.8%, comprised of 6.7% rated special mention and 17.1% rated substandard or lower. At December 31, 2016, the overall level of loans rated special mention or lower in the energy portfolio was 32.7%, comprised of 8.7% rated special mention and 24.0% rated substandard or lower.
Currently, the credit quality issues have mostly been isolated to the exploration and production subsector and the drilling oil and support services subsector, even though the latter represents a relatively small percentage of the portfolio. These subsectors are the subsectors most acutely impacted by pricing conditions. Within this subsector, many loans are secured and utilize borrowing base features linked to the physical commodity reserves and supported by engineering data. The borrowing bases are refreshed with updated information on a recurring basis. The Company generally continues to see adequate collateral support of secured energy borrowers, including secured reserve based lines of credit

for exploration and production borrowers. The Company's internal valuation methodologies involve independent engineering analysis of a borrower's reserve to calculate the present value of discounted cash flows that secure the loan. In doing so, the Company applies its oil and gas pricing policy, or when needed external market indices for oil and gas prices. Generally, the drilling oil and support services subsector also has a high risk for impact from the pricing environment since its operations are directly impacted by reduced spending by those in the exploration and production sector. However as noted in Table 13, the Company's exposure in this sector is limited.
For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017, charge-offs on energy loans were approximately $127 thousand and $56.7 million, respectively, compared to $8.5 million and $49.4 million, respectively, for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016. If oil prices resume their decline, this energy-related portfolio may be subject to additional pressure on credit quality metrics including past due, criticized, and nonperforming loans, as well as net charge-offs. Through its ongoing portfolio credit quality assessment, the Company has and will continue to assess the impact to the allowance for loan losses and make adjustments as appropriate. As of September 30, 2017, the Company's allowance for loan losses attributable to the energy portfolio totaled approximately 2.7% of outstanding energy loans.
Commercial Real Estate
The commercial real estate portfolio segment includes the commercial real estate and real estate - construction loan portfolios. Commercial real estate loans totaled $11.3 billion and $11.2$13.0 billion at September 30, 2017both March 31, 2019 and December 31, 2016, respectively,2018, and real estate — construction loans totaled $2.2$1.9 billion at September 30, 2017March 31, 2019 and $2.1$2.0 billion at December 31, 2016.2018.
This portfolio segment consists primarily of extensions of credits to real estate developers and investors for the financing of land and buildings, whereby the repayment is generated from the sale of the real estate or the income generated by the real estate property. The Company attempts to minimize risk on commercial real estate properties by various means, including requiring collateral with values that exceed the loan amount, adequate cash flow to service the debt, and the personal guarantees of principals of the borrowers. In order to minimize risk on the construction portfolio, the Company has established an operations group outside of the lending staff which is responsible for loan disbursements during the construction process.

The following tables present the geographic distribution for the commercial real estate and real estate — construction portfolios.
Table 14
Commercial Real Estate
Table 13
Commercial Real Estate
Table 13
Commercial Real Estate
 September 30, 2017 December 31, 2016 March 31, 2019 December 31, 2018
State Recorded Investment Nonaccrual Accruing TDRs Accruing Greater Than 90 Days Past Due Recorded Investment Nonaccrual Accruing TDRs Accruing Greater Than 90 Days Past Due Recorded Investment Nonaccrual Accruing TDRs Accruing Greater Than 90 Days Past Due Recorded Investment Nonaccrual Accruing TDRs Accruing Greater Than 90 Days Past Due
 (In Thousands) (In Thousands)
Alabama $406,441
 $7,849
 $2,411
 $
 $493,199
 $1,853
 $2,513
 $
 $370,393
 $5,256
 $2,180
 $
 $375,442
 $5,507
 $2,221
 $237
Arizona 795,651
 7,452
 
 
 847,908
 5,252
 
 
 842,750
 8,021
 
 
 855,007
 8,342
 
 
California 1,376,528
 2,319
 
 
 1,139,785
 4,645
 
 
 1,987,414
 
 
 28
 2,196,360
 
 
 1,722
Colorado 429,081
 6,311
 
 
 436,640
 6,902
 
 
 569,732
 6,863
 
 
 533,481
 6,036
 
 
Florida 1,079,177
 6,783
 110
 
 912,874
 7,262
 134
 
 1,090,408
 18,121
 56
 
 1,086,443
 18,030
 66
 
New Mexico 215,969
 8,415
 128
 
 174,911
 6,354
 132
 
 138,561
 3,607
 119
 
 157,473
 3,769
 121
 14
Texas 3,505,312
 41,642
 1,088
 3,686
 3,576,090
 33,043
 1,152
 
 3,884,412
 38,716
 590
 1,132
 3,911,128
 41,707
 382
 447
Other 3,534,219
 27,269
 908
 
 3,629,253
 6,610
 929
 
 4,071,526
 28,863
 866
 
 3,901,462
 26,753
 871
 
 $11,342,378
 $108,040
 $4,645
 $3,686
 $11,210,660
 $71,921
 $4,860
 $
 $12,955,196
 $109,447
 $3,811
 $1,160
 $13,016,796
 $110,144
 $3,661
 $2,420

Table 15
Real Estate – Construction
Table 14
Real Estate – Construction
Table 14
Real Estate – Construction
 September 30, 2017 December 31, 2016 March 31, 2019 December 31, 2018
State Recorded Investment Nonaccrual Accruing TDRs Accruing Greater Than 90 Days Past Due Recorded Investment Nonaccrual Accruing TDRs Accruing Greater Than 90 Days Past Due Recorded Investment Nonaccrual Accruing TDRs Accruing Greater Than 90 Days Past Due Recorded Investment Nonaccrual Accruing TDRs Accruing Greater Than 90 Days Past Due
 (In Thousands) (In Thousands)
Alabama $37,745
 $84
 $
 $133
 $17,517
 $43
 $
 $
 $71,423
 $95
 $
 $115
 $64,758
 $96
 $
 $69
Arizona 135,506
 
 
 1,224
 94,191
 
 
 
 201,305
 
 
 
 181,143
 
 
 
California 265,854
 
 
 756
 246,094
 
 
 
 239,653
 
 
 
 253,416
 
 
 
Colorado 80,691
 
 
 
 91,434
 
 
 
 65,647
 
 
 
 111,375
 
 
 
Florida 229,085
 
 
 
 228,530
 2
 
 
 179,218
 
 
 
 213,502
 
 
 
New Mexico 10,947
 
 53
 
 16,487
 
 1,163
 
 8,208
 
 45
 1
 6,868
 
 46
 
Texas 1,079,470
 1,468
 53
 842
 1,024,830
 1,066
 1,230
 2,007
 752,266
 777
 66
 417
 754,994
 2,331
 70
 475
Other 407,846
 325
 
 
 406,233
 128
 
 
 427,627
 426
 
 
 411,481
 424
 
 
 $2,247,144
 $1,877
 $106
 $2,955
 $2,125,316
 $1,239
 $2,393
 $2,007
 $1,945,347
 $1,298
 $111
 $533
 $1,997,537
 $2,851
 $116
 $544
Residential Real Estate
The residential real estate portfolio includes residential real estate — mortgage loans, equity lines of credit and equity loans. The residential real estate portfolio primarily contains loans to individuals, which are secured by single-family residences. Loans of this type are generally smaller in size than commercial real estate loans and are geographically dispersed throughout the Company's market areas, with some guaranteed by government agencies or private mortgage insurers. Losses on residential real estate loans depend, to a large degree, on the level of interest rates, the unemployment rate, economic conditions and collateral values.

Residential real estate - mortgage loans totaled $13.4 billion and $13.3 billion at September 30, 2017both March 31, 2019 and December 31, 2016, respectively.2018. Risks associated with residential real estate — mortgage loans are mitigated through rigorous underwriting procedures, collateral values established by independent appraisers and mortgage insurance. In addition, the collateral for this portfolio segment is concentrated in the Company's footprint as indicated in the table below.
Table 16
Residential Real Estate — Mortgage
Table 15
Residential Real Estate — Mortgage
Table 15
Residential Real Estate — Mortgage
 September 30, 2017 December 31, 2016 March 31, 2019 December 31, 2018
State Recorded Investment Nonaccrual Accruing TDRs Accruing Greater Than 90 Days Past Due Recorded Investment Nonaccrual Accruing TDRs Accruing Greater Than 90 Days Past Due Recorded Investment Nonaccrual Accruing TDRs Accruing Greater Than 90 Days Past Due Recorded Investment Nonaccrual Accruing TDRs Accruing Greater Than 90 Days Past Due
 (In Thousands) (In Thousands)
Alabama $980,473
 $19,071
 $12,484
 $183
 $1,005,975
 $16,607
 $11,390
 $512
 $935,175
 $22,704
 $11,916
 $1,574
 $944,556
 $23,285
 $11,677
 $1,002
Arizona 1,279,565
 12,644
 8,697
 227
 1,270,521
 11,831
 9,901
 412
 1,352,308
 13,742
 7,451
 293
 1,334,736
 12,572
 8,415
 217
California 3,004,957
 16,369
 3,098
 63
 2,929,393
 16,258
 2,164
 429
 3,256,048
 13,873
 4,358
 916
 3,252,592
 15,898
 3,910
 
Colorado 1,139,609
 18,532
 2,710
 
 1,111,097
 14,165
 2,552
 
 1,134,245
 5,067
 1,173
 
 1,132,517
 5,255
 784
 
Florida 1,701,821
 38,227
 9,493
 289
 1,697,555
 28,266
 10,636
 120
 1,572,840
 39,306
 11,072
 584
 1,590,912
 39,699
 9,908
 1,433
New Mexico 222,332
 3,292
 1,616
 110
 216,865
 1,955
 1,630
 
 216,913
 3,656
 1,285
 
 219,434
 3,683
 1,287
 
Texas 4,586,976
 49,581
 17,488
 1,522
 4,539,469
 34,232
 18,850
 1,752
 4,517,551
 50,014
 19,917
 2,994
 4,536,383
 50,069
 19,293
 3,275
Other 482,770
 17,774
 3,500
 164
 489,119
 16,989
 2,770
 131
 411,316
 15,101
 1,995
 2,646
 411,026
 16,638
 2,172
 
 $13,398,503
 $175,490
 $59,086
 $2,558
 $13,259,994
 $140,303
 $59,893
 $3,356
 $13,396,396
 $163,463
 $59,167
 $9,007
 $13,422,156
 $167,099
 $57,446
 $5,927
The following table provides information related to refreshed FICO scores for the Company's residential real estate portfolio.
Table 17
Residential Real Estate - Mortgage
Table 16
Residential Real Estate - Mortgage
Table 16
Residential Real Estate - Mortgage
 September 30, 2017 December 31, 2016 March 31, 2019 December 31, 2018
FICO Score Recorded Investment Nonaccrual Accruing TDRs Accruing Greater Than 90 Days Past Due Recorded Investment Nonaccrual Accruing TDRs Accruing Greater Than 90 Days Past Due Recorded Investment Nonaccrual Accruing TDRs Accruing Greater Than 90 Days Past Due Recorded Investment Nonaccrual Accruing TDRs Accruing Greater Than 90 Days Past Due
 (In Thousands) (In Thousands)
Below 621 $698,415
 $110,588
 $14,386
 $1,110
 $664,660
 $91,262
 $14,831
 $2,111
 $735,544
 $111,662
 $20,115
 $5,521
 $730,294
 $113,560
 $19,131
 $4,803
621 – 680 1,237,705
 26,086
 20,278
 244
 1,279,658
 21,507
 16,854
 825
 1,134,063
 19,757
 12,911
 144
 1,146,999
 20,877
 14,168
 301
681 – 720 1,931,767
 9,274
 10,439
 98
 1,980,276
 6,288
 13,921
 37
 1,731,800
 12,460
 11,596
 121
 1,725,819
 11,471
 9,031
 451
Above 720 8,780,212
 4,411
 13,464
 831
 8,548,993
 4,327
 13,957
 193
 9,202,495
 10,439
 13,963
 3,038
 9,208,678
 11,156
 14,847
 107
Unknown 750,404
 25,131
 519
 275
 786,407
 16,919
 330
 190
 592,494
 9,145
 582
 183
 610,366
 10,035
 269
 265
 $13,398,503
 $175,490
 $59,086
 $2,558
 $13,259,994
 $140,303
 $59,893
 $3,356
 $13,396,396
 $163,463
 $59,167
 $9,007
 $13,422,156
 $167,099
 $57,446
 $5,927

Equity lines of credit and equity loans totaled $3.0 billion at both September 30, 2017March 31, 2019 and December 31, 2016.2018. Losses in these portfolios generally track overall economic conditions. These loans are underwritten in accordance with the underwriting standards set forth in the Company's policy and procedures. The collateral for this portfolio segment is concentrated within the Company's footprint as indicated in the table below.
Table 18
Equity Loans and Lines
Table 17
Equity Loans and Lines
Table 17
Equity Loans and Lines
 September 30, 2017 December 31, 2016 March 31, 2019 December 31, 2018
State Recorded Investment Nonaccrual Accruing TDRs Accruing Greater Than 90 Days Past Due Recorded Investment Nonaccrual Accruing TDRs Accruing Greater Than 90 Days Past Due Recorded Investment Nonaccrual Accruing TDRs Accruing Greater Than 90 Days Past Due Recorded Investment Nonaccrual Accruing TDRs Accruing Greater Than 90 Days Past Due
 (In Thousands) (In Thousands)
Alabama $550,451
 $10,477
 $9,157
 $509
 $566,990
 $8,380
 $11,338
 $932
 $485,632
 $11,288
 $7,939
 $256
 $498,839
 $11,536
 $8,062
 $477
Arizona 381,562
 7,929
 3,724
 665
 399,225
 8,562
 4,396
 989
 344,147
 6,780
 3,796
 164
 348,763
 6,409
 4,005
 221
California 338,114
 823
 379
 70
 314,929
 1,216
 285
 
 428,430
 1,099
 265
 233
 426,179
 3,358
 267
 402
Colorado 191,161
 3,497
 1,477
 18
 192,517
 3,802
 1,388
 86
 186,755
 2,808
 832
 
 193,122
 2,822
 841
 128
Florida 371,592
 9,037
 6,516
 346
 382,853
 9,195
 7,375
 583
 321,620
 8,469
 5,549
 276
 332,367
 8,646
 5,704
 398
New Mexico 53,128
 1,539
 652
 
 53,491
 2,087
 600
 
 48,324
 1,583
 587
 
 50,873
 1,515
 593
 286
Texas 1,078,023
 11,461
 8,492
 1,327
 1,040,395
 12,309
 8,997
 704
 1,162,123
 11,553
 6,829
 516
 1,166,304
 13,097
 6,901
 446
Other 36,657
 958
 414
 84
 39,087
 1,537
 367
 123
 27,445
 1,259
 391
 60
 29,384
 1,258
 395
 48
 $3,000,688
 $45,721
 $30,811
 $3,019
 $2,989,487
 $47,088
 $34,746
 $3,417
 $3,004,476
 $44,839
 $26,188
 $1,505
 $3,045,831
 $48,641
 $26,768
 $2,406

The following table provides information related to refreshed FICO scores for the Company's equity loans and lines.
Table 19
Equity Loans and Lines
Table 18
Equity Loans and Lines
Table 18
Equity Loans and Lines
 September 30, 2017 December 31, 2016 March 31, 2019 December 31, 2018
FICO Score Recorded Investment Nonaccrual Accruing TDRs Accruing Greater Than 90 Days Past Due Recorded Investment Nonaccrual Accruing TDRs Accruing Greater Than 90 Days Past Due Recorded Investment Nonaccrual Accruing TDRs Accruing Greater Than 90 Days Past Due Recorded Investment Nonaccrual Accruing TDRs Accruing Greater Than 90 Days Past Due
 (In Thousands) (In Thousands)
Below 621 $218,316
 $21,825
 $7,654
 $2,543
 $207,659
 $24,532
 $8,723
 $1,940
 $213,265
 $23,602
 $7,338
 $1,251
 $204,527
 $26,747
 $5,905
 $1,923
621 – 680 387,696
 12,003
 11,875
 221
 412,752
 12,930
 13,326
 542
 371,803
 10,005
 7,274
 137
 376,248
 9,548
 9,126
 254
681 – 720 544,717
 7,971
 4,542
 85
 557,850
 6,980
 6,081
 713
 536,033
 7,080
 4,491
 35
 537,568
 8,014
 3,908
 106
Above 720 1,838,787
 3,762
 6,666
 170
 1,798,151
 2,466
 6,430
 222
 1,875,989
 3,808
 7,085
 82
 1,919,796
 3,950
 7,829
 106
Unknown 11,172
 160
 74
 
 13,075
 180
 186
 
 7,386
 344
 
 
 7,692
 382
 
 17
 $3,000,688
 $45,721
 $30,811
 $3,019
 $2,989,487
 $47,088
 $34,746
 $3,417
 $3,004,476
 $44,839
 $26,188
 $1,505
 $3,045,831
 $48,641
 $26,768
 $2,406
Other Consumer
The Company centrally underwrites and sources from the Company's branches or online, credit card loans and other consumer direct loans. Total consumer direct loans at March 31, 2019 were $2.5 billion and $2.6 billion at December 31, 2018. Total credit cards at March 31, 2019 were $833 million and $818 million at December 31, 2018.
The Company also operates a consumer finance unit which purchases loan contracts for indirect automobile and other consumer financing. These loans are centrally underwritten using underwriting guidelines and industry accepted tools. Total consumer indirect loans were $3.8 billion at both March 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018.

The Company also originates credit card loans and other consumer direct loans that are centrally underwritten and sourced fromfollowing tables provide information related to refreshed FICO scores for the Company's branches or online. Total credit card, consumer direct and consumer indirect loans at September 30, 2017 were $5.2 billion, or 8.7% of the total loan portfolio compared to $5.0 billion, or 8.3% of the total loan portfolio at December 31, 2016.loans.
Table 19
Consumer Direct
  March 31, 2019 December 31, 2018
FICO Score Recorded Investment Nonaccrual Accruing TDRs Accruing Greater Than 90 Days Past Due Recorded Investment Nonaccrual Accruing TDRs Accruing Greater Than 90 Days Past Due
  (In Thousands)
Below 621 $240,831
 $3,802
 $1,295
 $15,302
 $217,273
 $3,870
 $1,002
 $12,197
621 – 680 510,086
 454
 861
 291
 531,466
 257
 387
 178
681 – 720 593,225
 189
 1,698
 30
 596,889
 147
 1,295
 311
Above 720 1,126,393
 280
 
 60
 1,149,606
 254
 
 11
Unknown 63,381
 
 
 1,568
 58,354
 
 
 639
  $2,533,916
 $4,725
 $3,854
 $17,251
 $2,553,588
 $4,528
 $2,684
 $13,336
Table 20
Consumer Indirect
  March 31, 2019 December 31, 2018
FICO Score Recorded Investment Nonaccrual Accruing TDRs Accruing Greater Than 90 Days Past Due Recorded Investment Nonaccrual Accruing TDRs Accruing Greater Than 90 Days Past Due
  (In Thousands)
Below 621 $880,920
 $18,297
 $
 $7,456
 $865,702
 $14,700
 $
 $9,128
621 – 680 1,072,516
 2,243
 
 222
 1,083,116
 2,084
 
 381
681 – 720 714,159
 770
 
 53
 719,093
 648
 
 69
Above 720 1,137,242
 477
 
 50
 1,099,289
 402
 
 213
Unknown 2,615
 56
 
 
 2,819
 
 
 
  $3,807,452
 $21,843
 $
 $7,781
 $3,770,019
 $17,834
 $
 $9,791
Foreign Exposure
As of September 30, 2017,March 31, 2019, foreign exposure risk did not represent a significant concentration of the Company's total portfolio of loans and was substantially represented by borrowers domiciled in Mexico and foreign borrowers currently residing in the United States. 
Funding Activities
Deposits are the primary source of funds for lending and investing activities and their cost is the largest category of interest expense. The Company also utilizes brokered deposits as a funding source in addition to customer deposits. Scheduled payments, as well as prepayments, and maturities from portfolios of loans and investment securities also provide a stable source of funds. FHLB advances, other secured borrowings, federal funds purchased, securities sold under agreements to repurchase and other short-term borrowed funds, as well as longer-term debt issued through the capital markets, all provide supplemental liquidity sources. The Company’s funding activities are monitored and governed through the Company’s asset/liability management process.

At September 30, 2017,There were no changes in the Company's and Bank's credit rating during the three months ended March 31, 2019. The Company's and the Bank's credit ratings at March 31, 2019 were as follows:
Table 2021
Credit Ratings
 As of September 30, 2017March 31, 2019
 Standard & Poor’s Moody’s Fitch
BBVA Compass Bancshares, Inc.     
Long-term debt ratingBBB+ Baa3Baa2 BBB+
Short-term debt ratingA-2 - F2
Compass Bank     
Long-term debt ratingBBB+ Baa3Baa2 BBB+
Long-term bank deposits (1)N/A A3A2 A-
Subordinated debtBBB Baa3Baa2 BBB-BBB
Short-term debt ratingA-2 P-3P-2 F2
Short-term deposit rating (2)(1)N/A P-2P-1 F2
OutlookStable Stable StableNegative
(1) S&P does not provide a rating for long-term bank deposits; therefore, the rating is N/A.
(2) S&P does not provide a short-term deposit rating; therefore, the rating is N/A.
The cost and availability of financing to the Company and the Bank are impacted by its credit ratings. A downgrade to the Company’s or Bank’s credit ratings could affect its ability to access the credit markets and increase its borrowing costs, thereby adversely impacting the Company’s financial condition and liquidity. Key factors in maintaining high credit ratings include a stable and diverse earnings stream, strong credit quality, strong capital ratios and diverse funding sources, in addition to disciplined liquidity monitoring procedures. See the risk factors disclosed in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016,2018, for additional information.
A securitycredit rating is not a recommendation to buy, sell or hold securities, and the ratings are subject to revision or withdrawal by the assigning rating agency. Each rating should be evaluated independently of any other rating.
Deposits
Total deposits decreasedincreased by $66 million$2.2 billion from December 31, 20162018 to September 30, 2017.March 31, 2019. At September 30, 2017March 31, 2019 and December 31, 2016,2018, total deposits included $8.4$8.5 billion and $5.8$9.0 billion, respectively, of brokered deposits, respectively.deposits. The following table presents the Company’s deposits segregated by major category:
Table 21
Composition of Deposits
Table 22
Composition of Deposits
Table 22
Composition of Deposits
September 30, 2017 December 31, 2016March 31, 2019 December 31, 2018
Balance % of Total Balance % of TotalBalance % of Total Balance % of Total
(Dollars in Thousands)(Dollars in Thousands)
Noninterest-bearing demand deposits$21,094,235
 31.4% $20,332,792
 30.2%$20,403,716
 27.4% $20,183,876
 28.0%
Interest-bearing demand deposits7,945,902
 11.8
 8,188,868
 12.2
9,509,563
 12.8
 8,400,192
 11.6
Savings and money market24,691,943
 36.7
 25,330,003
 37.6
28,508,858
 38.3
 27,877,124
 38.6
Time deposits13,481,487
 20.1
 13,427,870
 20.0
15,958,171
 21.5
 15,706,795
 21.8
Total deposits$67,213,567
 100.0% $67,279,533
 100.0%$74,380,308
 100.0% $72,167,987
 100.0%
Borrowed Funds
In addition to internal deposit generation, the Company also relies on borrowed funds as a supplemental source of funding. Borrowed funds consist of short-term borrowings, FHLB advances, subordinated debentures and other long-term borrowings.
Short-term borrowings are primarily in the form of federal funds purchased, securities sold under agreements to repurchase and other short-term borrowings.

The short-term borrowings table presents the distribution of the Company’s short-term borrowed funds and the corresponding weighted average interest rates. Also provided are the maximum outstanding amounts of borrowings, the average amounts of borrowings and the average interest rates at period-end.
Table 22
Short-Term Borrowings
Table 23
Short-Term Borrowings
Table 23
Short-Term Borrowings
Maximum Outstanding at Any Month End Average Balance Average Interest Rate Ending Balance Average Interest Rate at Period EndMaximum Outstanding at Any Month End Average Balance Average Interest Rate Ending Balance Average Interest Rate at Period End
(Dollars in Thousands)(Dollars in Thousands)
Balance at September 30, 2017         
Balance at March 31, 2019         
Federal funds purchased$
 $373
 0.36% $
 0.53%$5,060
 $398
 2.50% $5,060
 2.50%
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase (1)114,361
 64,303
 0.93
 44,761
 0.84
407,248
 411,527
 1.69
 182,964
 2.83
Other short-term borrowings2,721,539
 2,239,427
 1.45
 327,539
 0.68
69,446
 28,117
 2.83
 30,975
 2.00
$2,835,900
 $2,304,103
   $372,300
  $481,754
 $440,042
   $218,999
  
Balance at December 31, 2016         
Balance at December 31, 2018         
Federal funds purchased$766,095
 $372,355
 0.49% $12,885
 0.39%$2,000
 $82
 2.50% $
 %
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase (1)148,291
 79,625
 0.49
 26,167
 0.55
183,511
 109,770
 1.78
 102,275
 3.73
Other short-term borrowings4,497,354
 3,778,752
 1.44
 2,802,977
 1.68
159,004
 68,423
 3.04
 
 
$5,411,740
 $4,230,732
   $2,842,029
  $344,515
 $178,275
   $102,275
  
(1)Average interest rate does not reflect impact of balance sheet offsetting. See Note 6, Securities Financing Activities, in the Notes to the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
Total short-term borrowings decreased to $372 million at September 30, 2017 from $2.8 billion at DecemberAt both March 31, 2016 due to a reduction in U.S. Treasury short positions held by BSI.
At September 30, 20172019 and December 31, 2016,2018, FHLB and other borrowings were $4.0 billion and $3.0 billion, respectively. In June 2017, the Bank issued under its Global Bank Note Program $750 million aggregate principal amount of its 2.875% unsecured senior notes due 2022. billion.
For the ninethree months ended September 30, 2017,March 31, 2019, the Company had $9.2$3.8 billion of proceeds received from FHLB and other borrowings and repayments were approximately $8.3$3.8 billion.
Shareholder’s Equity
Total shareholder's equity was $13.1$13.7 billion at September 30, 2017,March 31, 2019, compared to $12.8$13.5 billion at December 31, 2016,2018, an increase of $365$215 million. Shareholder's equity increased $407$140 million due to earnings attributable to the Company during the period, as well as a $74 million decrease in accumulated other comprehensive loss largely attributable to a decrease in unrealized losses on available for sale securities offset, in part, by the payment of preferred and common dividends totaling $71.0$4.5 million to its sole shareholder, BBVA.
Risk Management
In the normal course of business, the Company encounters inherent risk in its business activities. The Company’s risk management approach includes processes for identifying, assessing, managing, monitoring and reporting risks. Management has grouped the risks facing its operations into the following categories: credit risk, interest rate risk, liquidity risk, operational risk, market risk, model risk, reputational risk, fiduciary risk, suitability risk, compliance risk, legal risk, and strategic and business risk. Each of these risks is managed through the Company’s ERM program. The ERM program provides the structure and framework necessary to identify, measure, control and manage risk across the organization. ERM is the cornerstone for defining risk tolerance, identifying and monitoring key risk indicators, managing capital and integrating the Company’s capital planning process with on-going risk assessments and related stress testing for major risks.

Market Risk Management
The effective management of market risk is essential to achieving the Company’s strategic financial objectives. As a financial institution, the Company’s most significant market risk exposure is interest rate risk in its balance sheet; however, market risk also includes product liquidity risk, price risk and volatility risk in the Company’s lines of business. The primary objectives of market risk management are to minimize any adverse effect that changes in market risk factors may have on net interest income, and to offset the risk of price changes for certain assets recorded at fair value.

Interest Rate Market Risk
The Company’s net interest income and the fair value of its financial instruments are influenced by changes in the level of interest rates. The Company manages its exposure to fluctuations in interest rates through policies established by its Asset/Liability Committee. The Asset/Liability Committee meets regularly and has responsibility for approving asset/liability management policies, formulating strategies to improve balance sheet positioning and/or earnings and reviewing the interest rate sensitivity of the Company.
Management utilizes an interest rate simulation model to estimate the sensitivity of the Company’s net interest income to changes in interest rates. Such estimates are based upon a number of assumptions for each scenario, including the level of balance sheet growth, deposit repricing characteristics and the rate of prepayments.
The estimated impact on the Company’s net interest income sensitivity over a one-year time horizon at September 30, 2017,March 31, 2019, is shown in the table below. Such analysis assumes a gradual and sustained parallel shift in interest rates, expectations of balance sheet growth and composition and the Company’s estimate of how interest-bearing transaction accounts would reprice in each scenario using current yield curves at September 30, 2017.March 31, 2019.
Table 2324
Net Interest Income Sensitivity
 Estimated % Change in Net Interest Income
 September 30, 2017March 31, 2019
Rate Change 
+ 200 basis points8.935.46 %
+ 100 basis points4.582.89
 - 100 basis points(4.825.05)
The following table shows the effect that the indicated changes in interest rates would have on EVE. Inherent in this calculation are many assumptions used to project lifetime cash flows for every item on the balance sheet that may or may not be realized, such as deposit decay rates, prepayment speeds and spread assumptions. This measurement only values existing business without consideration of new business or potential management actions.
Table 2425
Economic Value of Equity
 Estimated % Change in Economic Value of Equity
 September 30, 2017March 31, 2019
Rate Change 
+ 300 basis points(6.10)(11.20) %
+ 200 basis points(3.807.22)
+ 100 basis points(1.643.24)
 - 100 basis points(0.720.55)
The Company is also subject to trading risk. The Company utilizes various tools to measure and manage price risk in its trading portfolios. In addition, the Board of Directors of the Company has established certain limits relative to positions and activities. The level of price risk exposure at any given point in time depends on the market environment and expectation of future price and market movements, and will vary from period to period.

Derivatives
The Company uses derivatives primarily to manage economic risks related to commercial loans, mortgage banking operations, long-term debt and other funding sources. The Company also uses derivatives to facilitate transactions on behalf of its clients. As of September 30, 2017,March 31, 2019, the Company had derivative financial instruments outstanding with notional amounts of $46.8$47.5 billion. The estimated net fair value of open contracts was in an asset position of $37$100 million at September 30, 2017.March 31, 2019. For additional information about derivatives, refer to Note 5, Derivatives and Hedging, in the Notes to the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

Liquidity Management
Liquidity is the ability of the Company to convert assets into cash or cash equivalents without significant loss and to raise additional funds by increasing liabilities. Liquidity management involves maintaining the Company’s ability to meet the day-to-day cash flow requirements of its customers, whether they are depositors wishing to withdraw funds or borrowers requiring funds to meet their credit needs. Without proper liquidity management, the Company would not be able to perform the primary function of a financial intermediary and would, therefore, not be able to meet the needs of the communities it serves.
The Company regularly assesses liquidity needs under various scenarios of market conditions, asset growth and changes in credit ratings. The assessment includes liquidity stress testing which measures various sources and uses of funds under the different scenarios. The assessment provides regular monitoring of unused borrowing capacity and available sources of contingent liquidity to prepare for unexpected liquidity needs and to cover unanticipated events that could affect liquidity.
The asset portion of the balance sheet provides liquidity primarily through unencumbered securities available for sale, loan principal and interest payments, maturities and prepayments of investment securities held to maturity and, to a lesser extent, sales of investment securities available for sale and trading account assets. Other short-term investments such as federal funds sold, and securities purchased under agreements to resell, are additional sources of liquidity.
The liability portion of the balance sheet provides liquidity through various customers’ interest-bearing and noninterest-bearing deposit accounts and through FHLB and other borrowings. Brokered deposits, federal funds purchased, securities sold under agreements to repurchase and other short-term borrowings as well as excess borrowing capacity with the FHLB and access to the debt capital markets are additional sources of liquidity and, basically, represent the Company’s incremental borrowing capacity. These sources of liquidity are used as necessary to fund asset growth and meet short-term liquidity needs.
In addition to the Company’s financial performance and condition, liquidity may be impacted by the Parent’s structure as a holding company that is a separate legal entity from the Bank. The Parent requires cash for various operating needs including payment of dividends to its shareholder, the servicing of debt, and the payment of general corporate expenses. The primary source of liquidity for the Parent is dividends paid by the Bank. Applicable federal and state statutes and regulations impose restrictions on the amount of dividends that may be paid by the Bank. In addition to the formal statutes and regulations, regulatory authorities also consider the adequacy of the Bank’s total capital in relation to its assets, deposits and other such items. Due to the net earnings restrictions on dividend distributions under Alabama law, the Bank was not permitted to pay dividends at September 30, 2017March 31, 2019 or December 31, 20162018 without regulatory approval. Appropriate limits and guidelines are in place to ensure the Parent has sufficient cash to meet operating expenses and other commitments without relying on subsidiaries or capital markets for funding. Any future dividends paid from the Parent must be set forth as capital actions in the Company's capital plans and not objected to by the Federal Reserve Board.

On June 29, 2017, the Bank issued under its Global Bank Note Program $750 million aggregate principal amount of its 2.875% unsecured senior notes due 2022.
The Company’s ability to raise funding at competitive prices is affected by the rating agencies’ views of the Company’s credit quality, liquidity, capital and earnings. Management meets with the rating agencies on a routine basis to discuss the current outlook for the Company.

In 2014,The Federal Reserve Board will no longer take action to require the Company to comply with the Federal Reserve Board,Board’s LCR rule until it formally amends its regulations to implement the OCC,EGRRCPA. At March 31, 2019, the Company's LCR was 145% and the FDIC approved a final rule implementing a minimum liquidity coverage ratio requirement for certain large bank holding companies, savings and loan holding companies and depository institutions, and a less stringent LCR requirement for other banking organizations, such as the Company, with $50 billion or more in total consolidated assets. The final rule imposes a monthly reporting requirement. As of January 2017, the LCR requirement was 100 percent. At September 30, 2017, the Company was fully compliant with the LCR requirements in effect for 2017.requirements. However, should the Company's cash position or investment mix change in the future, the Company's ability to meet the LCR requirement may be impacted.
Management believes that the current sources of liquidity are adequate to meet the Company’s requirements and plans for continued growth.
Capital
The Company and the Bank are subject to various regulatory capital requirements administered by federal and state banking regulators. Failure to meet minimum risk-based and leverage capital requirements can subject the Company and the Bank to a series of increasingly restrictive regulatory actions.

The following table sets forth the Company's U.S. Basel III regulatory capital ratios subject to transitional provisions at September 30, 2017March 31, 2019 and December 31, 2016.2018.
Table 25
Capital Ratios
Table 26
Capital Ratios
Table 26
Capital Ratios
September 30, 2017 December 31, 2016March 31, 2019 December 31, 2018
(Dollars in Thousands)(Dollars in Thousands)
Capital:      
CET1 Capital$8,005,526
 $7,669,118
$8,631,558
 $8,457,585
Tier 1 Capital8,239,726
 7,907,518
8,865,758
 8,691,785
Total Capital9,706,431
 9,550,482
10,402,209
 10,216,625
Ratios:      
CET1 Risk-based Capital Ratio12.07% 11.49%12.34% 12.00%
Tier 1 Risk-based Capital Ratio12.42
 11.85
12.67
 12.33
Total Risk-based Capital Ratio14.63
 14.31
14.87
 14.49
Leverage Ratio10.00
 9.46
10.05
 10.03
At September 30, 2017,March 31, 2019, the regulatory capital ratios of the Bank exceeded the “well-capitalized” standard for banks based on applicable U.S. regulatory capital requirements. The Company continually monitors these ratios to ensure that the Bank exceeds this standard.
Item 3.
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
Refer to “Market Risk Management” in Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, herein.
Item 4.    Controls and Procedures
Disclosure Controls and Procedures.
Management of the Company, with the participation of its Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures. Based on their evaluation, as of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act) were effective.

Changes In Internal Control Over Financial Reporting.
There have been no changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting during the most recent fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

PART II OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1.
Legal Proceedings
See under “Legal and Regulatory Proceedings” in Note 78, Commitments, Contingencies and Guarantees, of the Notes to the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
Item 1A.
Risk Factors
Various risk and uncertainties could affect the Company's business. These risks are described elsewhere in this report and the Company's other filings with the SEC, including the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year-ended December 31, 2016.2018.
There have been no material changes toThe following discussion updates the risk factors disclosed in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year-ended December 31, 2016.2018.
The Company's rebranding strategy may not produce the benefits expected, may involve substantial costs and may not be favorably received by Customers.
Since 2008, the Company has marketed the Company's products and services using the “BBVA Compass” brand name and logo. On April 24, 2019, BBVA announced that it is moving to unify its brand globally.  In the coming months, the Bank will begin the process of transitioning away from the use of the “BBVA Compass” name and rebranding as “BBVA.”
Developing and maintaining awareness and integrity of the Company and the Company's brand are important to achieving widespread acceptance of our existing and future offerings and are important elements in attracting new customers. The importance of brand recognition will increase as competition in the Company's market further intensifies. Successful promotion of the Company's brand will depend on the effectiveness of the Company's marketing efforts and on the Company's ability to provide reliable and useful banking solutions. The Company plans to continue investing substantial resources to promote the Company's brand, but there is no guarantee that the Company will be able to achieve or maintain brand name recognition or status under the new brand, “BBVA,” that is comparable to the recognition and status previously enjoyed by the “BBVA Compass” brand.  Even if the Company's brand recognition and loyalty increases, this may not result in increased use of the Company's products and services or higher revenue.
For these reasons, the Company's rebranding initiative may not produce the benefits expected, could adversely affect the Company's ability to retain and attract customers, and may have a negative impact on the Company's operations, business, financial results and financial condition.
Item 2.
Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
Omitted pursuant to General Instruction H of Form 10-Q.
Item 3.
Defaults Upon Senior Securities
Omitted pursuant to General Instruction H of Form 10-Q.
Item 4.
Mine Safety Disclosures
Not Applicable.
Item 5.    Other Information
Item 5.Other Information
Disclosure Pursuant to Section 219 of the Iran Threat Reduction and Syria Human Rights Act
The Company discloses the following information pursuant to Section 13(r) of the Exchange Act, which requires an issuer to disclose whether it or any of its affiliates knowingly engaged in certain activities, transactions or dealings relating to Iran or with natural persons or entities designated by the U.S. government under specified executive orders, including activities not prohibited by U.S. law and conducted outside the United States by non-U.S. affiliates in compliance with local law. In order to comply with this requirement, the Company has requested relevant information from its affiliates globally.

The Company has not knowingly engaged in activities, transactions or dealings relating to Iran or with natural persons or entities designated by the U.S. government under the specified executive orders.
Because the Company is controlled by BBVA, a Spanish corporation, the Company's disclosure includes activities, transactions or dealings conducted outside the United States by non-U.S. affiliates of BBVA and its consolidated subsidiaries that are not controlled by the Company. The BBVA Group has the following activities, transactions and dealings with Iran requiring disclosure.
Legacy contractual obligations related to counter indemnities. Before 2007, the BBVA Group issued certain counter indemnities to its non-Iranian customers in Europe for various business activities relating to Iran in support of guarantees provided by Bank Melli, one of which remained outstanding during the three months ended September 30, 2017. For the three months ended September 30, 2017, no fees and/or commissions have been recorded in connection with these counter indemnities. In accordance with Council Regulation (EU) Nr. 267/2012 of March 23, 2012, any payments of amounts due to Bank Melli under these counter indemnities were initially blocked and thereafter released upon authorization by the relevant Spanish authorities. The BBVA Group is committed to terminating the outstanding counter indemnity as soon as contractually possible and does not intend to enter into new business relationships involving Bank Melli.
Iranian embassy-related activity. The BBVA Group maintains bank accounts in Spain for one employee of the Iranian embassy in Spain. This employee is a Spanish citizen. Estimated gross revenues for the three months ended September 30, 2017,March 31, 2019, from embassy-related activity, which include fees and/or commissions, did not exceed $56.$1,062. The

BBVA Group does not allocate direct costs to fees and commissions and therefore has not disclosed a separate profit measure. The BBVA Group is committed to terminating these business relationships as soon as legally possible.

Item 6.
Exhibits
Exhibit NumberDescription of Documents
  
3.1
Restated Certificate of Formation of BBVA Compass Bancshares, Inc., (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Commission on April 13, 2015 File No. 0-55106 and as amended by the Certificate of Preferences and Rights of the Floating Non-Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock, Series A incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Commission on December 3, 2015, File No. 0-55106).
Bylaws of BBVA Compass Bancshares, Inc. (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.2 of the Company’s Registration Statement on Form 10 filed with the Commission on November 22, 2013, File No. 0-55106).
Certification by the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
Certification by the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
Certification by the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
Certification by the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
101.1Interactive Data File.

Certain instruments defining rights of holders of long-term debt of the Company and its subsidiaries constituting less than 10% of the Company’s total assets are not filed herewith pursuant to Item 601(b)(4)(iii)(A) of Regulation S-K. At the SEC’s request, the Company agrees to furnish the SEC a copy of any such agreement.


SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
Date: NovemberMay 8, 20172019BBVA Compass Bancshares, Inc.
 By:/s/ Kirk P. Pressley
  Name:Kirk P. Pressley
  Title:Senior Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Duly Authorized Officer



9382