UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

xR	QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the Quarterly Period Ended ~~September 30,~~December 31, 2014

o	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the Transition Period from ___ to ___

Commission File Number 1-14523

TRIO-TECH INTERNATIONAL

(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its Charter)

California		95-2086631
(State or other jurisdiction of		(I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization)		Identification Number)

16139 Wyandotte Street
Van Nuys, California		91406
(Address of principal executive offices)		(Zip Code)

Registrant's Telephone Number, Including Area Code: 818-787-7000

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes xR No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes xR No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large Accelerated Filer	o	Accelerated Filer	o

Non-Accelerated Filer	o	Smaller Reporting Company	x

(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No x

As of ~~November 12,~~February 08, 2014, there were 3,513,055 shares of the issuer’s Common Stock, no par value, outstanding.

TRIO-TECH INTERNATIONAL

INDEX TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL ~~INFORMATION,~~INFORMATION, OTHER INFORMATION AND SIGNATURE

		Page
Part I.	Financial Information

Item 1.	Financial ~~Information~~Statements
	(a) Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2014 (Unaudited) and June 30, 2014	2
	(b) Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income for the Three Months and Six Months Ended December 31, 2014 (Unaudited) and December 31, 2013 (Unaudited)	3
	(c) Condensed Consolidated Statements of Shareholders Equity for the Six Months Ended December 31, 2014 (Unaudited) and the Year Ended June 30, 2014	4
	(d) Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Six Months Ended December 31, 2014 (Unaudited) and December 31, 2013 (Unaudited)	5
	(e) Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)	6
Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	26
Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk	42
Item 4.	Controls and Procedures	42

Part II.	Other Information

Item 1.	~~Financial Statements~~Legal Proceedings	43
	~~(a) Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of September 30, 2014 (Unaudited) and June 30, 2014~~Item 1A.	2
	~~(b) Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income for the Three Months Ended September 30, 2014 (Unaudited) and September 2013 (Unaudited)~~Risk Factors	3
	~~(c) Condensed Consolidated Statements of Shareholders Equity for the Three Months Ended September 30, 2014 (Unaudited) and the Year Ended June 30, 2014~~	4
	~~(d) Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Three Months Ended September 30, 2014 (Unaudited) and September 30, 2013 (Unaudited)~~	5
	~~(e) Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)~~	643
Item 2.	~~Management’s Discussion~~Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and ~~Analysis~~Use of ~~Financial Condition and Results of Operations~~Proceeds	2243
Item 3.	~~Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk~~Defaults upon Senior Securities	3143
Item 4.	~~Controls and Procedures~~Mine Safety Disclosures	31

~~Part II.~~	~~Other Information~~

~~Item 1.~~	~~Legal Proceedings~~	32
~~Item 1A.~~	~~Risk Factors~~	32
~~Item 2.~~	~~Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds~~	32
~~Item 3.~~	~~Defaults upon Senior Securities~~	32
~~Item 4.~~	~~Mine Safety Disclosures~~	3243
Item 5.	Other Information	3243
Item 6.	Exhibits	3243

Signatures	33	44

-i-

~~Table of Contents~~

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

The discussions of Trio-Tech International’s (the “Company”) business and activities set forth in this Form 10-Q and in other past and future reports and announcements by the Company may contain forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and assumptions regarding future activities and results of operations of the Company. In light of the “safe harbor” provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, the following factors, among others, could cause actual results to differ materially from those reflected in any forward-looking statements made by or on behalf of the Company: market acceptance of Company products and services; changing business conditions or technologies and volatility in the semiconductor industry, which could affect demand for the Company’s products and services; the impact of competition; problems with technology; product development schedules; delivery schedules; changes in military or commercial testing specifications which could affect the market for the Company’s products and services; difficulties in profitably integrating acquired businesses, if any, into the Company; risks associated with conducting business internationally and especially in Southeast Asia, including currency fluctuations and devaluation, currency restrictions, local laws and restrictions and possible social, political and economic instability; changes in U.S. and global financial and equity markets, including market disruptions and significant interest rate fluctuations; and other economic, financial and regulatory factors beyond the Company’s control. Other than statements of historical fact, all statements made in this Quarterly Report are forward-looking, including, but not limited to, statements regarding industry prospects, future results of operations or financial position, and statements of our intent, belief and current expectations about our strategic direction, prospective and future financial results and condition. In some cases, you can identify forward-looking statements by the use of terminology such as “may,” “will,” “expects,” “plans,” “anticipates,” “estimates,” “potential,” “believes,” “can impact,” “continue,” or the negative thereof or other comparable terminology. Forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties that are inherently difficult to predict, which could cause actual outcomes and results to differ materially from our expectations, forecasts and assumptions.

Unless otherwise required by law, we undertake no obligation to update forward-looking statements to reflect subsequent events, changed circumstances, or the occurrence of unanticipated events. You are cautioned not to place undue reliance on such forward-looking statements.

-1-

~~Table of Contents~~

PART I. ~~FINANCI~~ALFINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM ~~1. FINANCI~~1AL. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

TRIO-TECH INTERNATIONAL AND S~~UBSIDIARIES~~SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT NUMBER OF SHARES)

		September 30, 2014		June 30, 2014		December 31, 2014		June 30, 2014
ASSETS		(Unaudited)				(Unaudited)
CURRENT ASSETS:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	2,157	$	2,938	$	2,409	$	2,938
Short-term deposits		104		102		103		102
Trade accounts receivable, less allowance for doubtful
accounts of $485 and $438		7,850		8,625
accounts of $477 and $438						8,232		8,625
Other receivables		413		311		405		311
Loans receivable from property development projects – short term		-		-
Inventories, less provision for obsolete inventory
of $841 and $844		1,494		1,106
of $740 and $844						1,450		1,106
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		260		205		263		205
Total current assets		12,278		13,287		12,862		13,287
NON-CURRENT ASSETS:
Deferred tax asset		382		388		368		388
Investments		-		-		-		-
Investment properties, net		1,752		1,765		1,703		1,765
Property, plant and equipment, net		13,326		13,541		12,596		13,541
Loans receivable from property development projects – long term		814		805
Loans receivable from property development projects						-		805
Other assets		1,306		1,263		1,997		1,263
Restricted term deposits		3,477		3,541		3,344		3,541
Total non-current assets		21,057		21,303		20,008		21,303
TOTAL ASSETS	$	33,335	$	34,590	$	32,870	$	34,590

LIABILITIES
CURRENT LIABILITIES:
Lines of credit	$	3,048	$	3,767	$	2,689	$	3,767
Accounts payable		3,244		3,162		3,332		3,162
Accrued expenses		2,685		3,046		2,992		3,046
Income taxes payable		216		214		267		214
Current portion of bank loans payable		292		448		178		448
Current portion of capital leases		71		81		79		81
Total current liabilities		9,556		10,718		9,537		10,718
NON-CURRENT LIABILITIES:
Bank loans payable, net of current portion		2,504		2,598		2,298		2,598
Capital leases, net of current portion		185		200		171		200
Deferred tax liabilities		129		202		129		202
Other non-current liabilities		39		39		38		39
Total non-current liabilities		2,857		3,039		2,636		3,039
TOTAL LIABILITIES	$	12,413	$	13,757	$	12,173	$	13,757

COMMITMENT AND CONTINGENCIES		-		-		-		-

EQUITY
TRIO-TECH INTERNATIONAL’S SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY:
Common stock, no par value, 15,000,000 shares authorized; 3,513,055 shares issued and outstanding as at September 30, 2014, and June 30, 2014	$	10,882	$	10,882
Common stock, no par value, 15,000,000 shares authorized; 3,513,055 shares issued and outstanding as at December 31, 2014 and June 30, 2014, respectively					$	10,882	$	10,882
Paid-in capital		2,981		2,972		3,070		2,972
Accumulated retained earnings		1,589		1,725		1,695		1,725
Accumulated other comprehensive gain-translation adjustments		3,625		3,522		3,170		3,522
Total Trio-Tech International shareholders' equity		19,077		19,101		18,817		19,101
Non-Controlling Interest		1,845		1,732
Non-controlling interest						1,880		1,732
TOTAL EQUITY	$	20,922	$	20,833	$	20,697	$	20,833
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND EQUITY	$	33,335	$	34,590	$	32,870	$	34,590

See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

-2-

TRIO-TECH INTERNATIONAL AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

UNAUDITED (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT EARNINGS PER SHARE)

	Six Months Ended						Three Months Ended
	Dec. 31,			Dec. 31,			Dec. 31,			Dec. 31,
	2014			2013			2014			2013
Revenue
Products	$	7,212		$	10,101		$	3,780		$	4,696
Testing services		9,691			8,645			5,073			4,597
Others		87			90			44			46

		16,990			18,836			8,897			9,339
Cost of Sales
Cost of products sold		6,276			8,410			3,063			4,064
Cost of testing services rendered		6,405			6,278			3,356			3,253
Others		69			70			35			35

		12,750			14,758			6,454			7,352

Gross Margin		4,240			4,078			2,443			1,987

Operating Expenses:
General and administrative		3,438			3,672			1,711			1,838
Selling		296			413			165			208
Research and development		94			101			47			49
Impairment loss		70			-			55			-
Loss / (gain) on disposal of property, plant and equipment		28			11			28			(2	)
Total operating expenses		3,926			4,197			2,006			2,093

Income / (Loss) from Operations		314			(119	)		437			(106	)

Other (Expenses) / Income
Interest expenses		(122	)		(134	)		(58	)		(66	)
Other income / (expenses), net		54			(41	)		7			(205	)
Total other (expenses) / income		(68	)		(175	)		(51	)		(271	)

Income / (loss) from Continuing Operations before Income Taxes		246			(294	)		386			(377	)

Income Tax (Expenses) / Benefits		(86	)		82			(132	)		39

Income / (loss) from continuing operations before non-controlling interest, net of tax		160			(212	)		254			(338	)

Other Operating Activities
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated joint venture, net of tax		-			-			-			-

Discontinued Operations (Note 16)
Income / (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax		20			(72	)		(6	)		(30	)
NET INCOME / (LOSS)		180			(284	)		248			(368	)

Less: net income / (loss) attributable to non-controlling interest		210			98			154			(3	)
Net (Loss) / Income Attributable to Trio-Tech International Common Shareholder	$	(30	)	$	(382	)	$	94		$	(365	)

Amounts Attributable to Trio-Tech International Common Shareholders:
(Loss) / income from continuing operations, net of tax		(41	)		(342	)		97			(348	)
Income / (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax		11			(40	)		(3	)		(17	)
Net (Loss) / Income Attributable to Trio-Tech International Common Shareholders	$	(30)		$	(382	)	$	94		$	(365	)

Comprehensive Income / (Loss) Attributable to Trio-Tech International Common Shareholders:

Net income / (loss)		180			(284	)		248			(368	)
Foreign currency translation, net of tax		(414	)		(144	)		(574	)		39
Comprehensive Loss		(234	)		(428	)		(326	)		(329)
Less: Comprehensive (loss) / income attributable to non-controlling interest		150			(5	)		36			(1	)
Comprehensive Loss Attributable to Trio-Tech International Common Shareholders	$	(384	)	$	(423	)	$	(362	)	$	(328	)

Basic and Diluted (Loss) / Earnings per Share:
Basic and diluted (loss) / earnings per share from continuing operations attributable to Trio-Tech International	$	(0.01	)	$	(0.10	)	$	0.03		$	(0.10	)
Basic and diluted loss per share from discontinued operations attributable to Trio-Tech International	$	-		$	(0.01	)	$	-		$	-
Basic and Diluted (Loss) /Earnings per Share from Net (Loss) / Income
Attributable to Trio-Tech International	$	(0.01	)	$	(0.11	)	$	0.03		$	(0.10	)

Weighted average number of common shares outstanding
Basic		3,513			3,508			3,513			3,508
Dilutive effect of stock options		-			-			-			-
Number of shares used to compute earnings per share diluted		3,513			3,508			3,513			3,508

See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

~~-2-~~-3-

~~Table of Contents~~

TRIO-TECH INTERNATIONAL AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF ~~OPERATIONS AND COMPR~~EH~~ENSIVE INCOME~~SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY

~~UNAUDITED (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT EARNINGS PER SHARE)~~(IN THOUSANDS)

Three Months Ended
Sept. 30, Sept. 30,
2014 2013
Revenue
  Products

$
3,432

$
5,405

  Testing services

4,618

4,048

  Others

43

44

8,093

9,497

Cost of Sales

   Cost of products sold

3,213

4,346

   Cost of testing services rendered

3,049

3,025

   Others

34

35

6,296

7,406

Gross Margin

1,797

2,091

Operating Expenses:

  General and administrative

1,738

1,834

  Selling

131

205

  Research and development

47

52

  Impairment loss of property, plant and equipment

15

-

  Loss on disposal of property, plant and equipment

-

13

           Total operating expenses

1,931

2,104

Loss from Operations

(134
)

(13
)

Other Income / (Expenses)

  Interest expenses

(64
)

(68
)
  Other income, net

46

164

  Total other (expenses) / income

(18
)

96

(Loss) / Income from Continuing Operations before Income Taxes

(152
)

83

Income Tax Benefits

46

43

(Loss) / Income from continuing operations before non-controlling interest, net of tax

(106
)

126

Other Operating Activities

Equity in earnings of unconsolidated joint venture, net of tax

-

-

Discontinued Operations (Note 19)

Income / (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax

26

(42
)
NET (LOSS) / INCOME

(80
)

84

Less: net income attributable to the non-controlling interest

56

101

Net Loss Attributable to Trio-Tech International Common Shareholder

$
(136
)

$
(17
)

Amounts Attributable to Trio-Tech International Common Shareholders:

(Loss) / income from continuing operations, net of tax

(150
)

6

Income / (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax

14

(23
)
Net Loss Attributable to Trio-Tech International Common Shareholders

$
(136
)

$
(17
)

Comprehensive Income / (Loss) Attributable to Trio-Tech International Common Shareholders:

Net (loss) / income

(80
)

84

Foreign currency translation, net of tax

160

(183
)
Comprehensive Income / (Loss)

80

(99
)
Less: comprehensive income / (loss) attributable to the non-controlling interest

113

(4
)
Comprehensive Loss Attributable to Trio-Tech International  Common Shareholders

$
(33
)

$
(95
)

Basic and Diluted Loss per Share:

Basic and diluted loss per share from continuing operations attributable to Trio-Tech International

$
(0.04
)

$
-

Basic and diluted loss per share from discontinued operations attributable to Trio-Tech International

$
-

$
(0.01
)
Basic and Diluted Loss per Share from Net Loss

Attributable to Trio-Tech International

$
(0.04
)

$
(0.01
)

Weighted average number of common shares outstanding

Basic

3,513

3,399

Dilutive effect of stock options

-

-

Number of shares used to compute earnings per share diluted

3,513

3,399

	Common Stock				Additional Paid-in		Accumulated Retained		Accumulated Other Comprehensive		Non- Controlling
	Shares		Amount		Capital		Earnings		Income		Interest		Total
				$		$		$	$		$			$
Balance at June 30, 2013		3,322		10,531		2,756		1,668	3,680		1,971			20,606

Stock option expenses		-		-		216		-	-		-			216
Net income		-		-		-		57	-		144			201
Translation adjustment		-		-		-		-	(158	)	(70	)		(228	)
Dividend declared by subsidiary		-		-		-		-	-		(313	)		(313	)
Stock options exercised		191		351		-		-	-		-			351
Balance at June 30, 2014		3,513		10,882		2,972		1,725	3,522		1,732			20,833

Stock option expenses		-		-		89		-	-		-			89
Contribution to capital - payable forgiveness		-		-		9		-	-		-			9
Net (loss) / income		-		-		-		(30)	-		210			180
Translation adjustment		-		-		-		-	(352	)	(62	)		(414	)
Balance at Dec. 31, 2014		3,513		10,882		3,070		1,695	3,170		1,880			20,697

See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

-4-

TRIO-TECH INTERNATIONAL AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (IN THOUSANDS)

	Six Months Ended December 31, 2014			Six Months Ended December 31, 2013 (Unaudited)


	(Unaudited)
Cash Flow from Operating Activities
Net income / (loss)	$	180			$	(284	)
Adjustments to reconcile net income / (loss) to net cash flow provided by operating activities
Depreciation and amortization		1,189				1,198
Bad debt expense, net		56				337
Inventory recovery		(73	)			(47	)
Warranty (recovery) / expense, net		(9	)			3
Accrued interest expense, net of interest income		49				5
Loss on sale of property-continued operations		28				11
Impairment loss		70				-
Contribution to capital - payable forgiveness		9				-
Stock option expenses		89				200
Deferred tax provision		(50	)			(23	)
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of acquisition effects
Accounts receivables		354				(504	)
Other receivables		(94	)			1,462
Other assets		78				(916	)
Inventories		(318	)			1,192
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		(58	)			(87	)
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities		190				(380	)
Income tax payable		55				8
Other non-current liabilities		-				26
Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities		1,745				2,201

Cash Flow from Investing Activities
Additions to property, plant and equipment		(899	)			(1,721	)
Proceeds from disposal of plant, property and equipment		16				31
Net Cash Used in Investing Activities		(883	)			(1,690	)

Cash Flow from Financing Activities
Repayment on lines of credit		(891	)			(445	)
Repayment of bank loans and capital leases		(473	)			(556	)
Proceeds from long-term bank loans		32				68
Proceeds from exercising stock options		-				342
Dividend paid to non-controlling interest		-				(80	)

Net Cash Used in Financing Activities		(1,332	)			(671	)

Effect of Changes in Exchange Rate		(590	)			(59	)

NET DECREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS		(529	)			(219	)
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, BEGINNING OF PERIOD AND CASH EQUIVALENTS		2,938				2,793
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, END OF PERIOD	$	2,409			$	2,574

Supplementary Information of Cash Flows
Cash paid during the period for:
Interest	$	125			$	132
Income taxes	$	76			$	20

Non-Cash Transactions
Capital lease of property, plant and equipment	$	32			$	68

See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

~~-3-~~

~~Table of Contents~~

~~TRIO-TECH INTERNATIONAL AND SUBSIDIARIES~~

~~CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY~~

~~(IN THOUSANDS)~~

Common
Stock
Additional Paid-in Accumulated Retained
Accumulated Other
Comprehensive
Non- Controlling
Shares Amount Capital Earnings Income Interest Total
$ $ $ $ $ $
Balance at June 30, 2013

3,322

10,531

2,756

1,668

3,680

1,971

20,606

Stock option expenses

-

-

216

-

-

-

216

Net income

-

-

-

57

-

144

201

Translation adjustment

-

-

-

-

(158
)

(70
)

(228
)
Dividend declared by subsidiary

-

-

-

-

-

(313
)

(313
)
Stock options exercised

191

351

-

-

-

-

351

Balance at June 30, 2014

3,513

10,882

2,972

1,725

3,522

1,732

20,833

Stock option expenses

-

-

9

-

-

-

9

Net (loss) / income

-

-

-

(136
)

-

56

(80
)
Translation adjustment

-

-

-

-

103

57

160

Balance at Sept. 30, 2014

3,513

10,882

2,981

1,589

3,625

1,845

20,922

~~See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.~~

~~-4-~~

~~Table of Contents~~

~~TRIO-TECH INTERNATIONAL AND SUBSIDIARIES~~

~~CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH F~~L~~OWS (IN THOUSANDS)~~

Three Months Ended
Sept. 30, Sept. 30,
2014 2013
(Unaudited) (Unaudited)
Cash Flow from Operating Activities
Net (loss) / income

$
(80
)

$
84

Adjustments to reconcile net (loss) / income to net cash flow provided by operating activities

Depreciation and amortization

623

602

Stock compensation

9

114

Inventory provision / (reversal)

8

(17
)
Bad debt provision / (reversal)

55

(3
)
Accrued interest expense, net accrued interest income

24

3

Impairment loss of property, plant and equipment

15

-

Loss on disposal of property, plant and equipment

-

13

Warranty expense, net

6

4

Deferred tax benefit

(77
)

(64
)
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of acquisition effects

   Accounts receivables

728

(266
)
   Other receivables

(102
)

599

   Other assets

(42
)

(364
)
   Inventories

(413
)

524

Prepaid expenses and other current assets

(55
)

(52
)
   Accounts payable and accrued liabilities

(234
)

25

   Income tax payable

1

(12
)
   Other non-current liabilities

-

23

Net cash provided by operating activities

466

1,213

Cash Flow from Investing Activities

Additions to property, plant and equipment

(467
)

(484
)
Proceeds from disposal of plant, property and equipment

-

28

Net cash used in investing activities

(467
)

(456
)

Cash Flow from Financing Activities

Repayment of lines of credit

(689
)

(869
)
Repayment of bank loans and capital leases

(261
)

(285
)
Proceeds from long-term bank loans

-

66

Proceeds from exercising stock options

-

134

Net cash used in financing activities

(950
)

(954
)

Effect of Changes in Exchange Rate

171

(75
)

NET DECREASE IN CASH

(781
)

(272
)
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, BEGINNING OF PERIOD

2,938

2,793

CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, END OF PERIOD

$
2,157

$
2,521

Supplementary Information of Cash Flows

Cash paid during the period for:

Interest

$
66

$
68

Income taxes

$
18

$
19

Non-Cash Transactions

  Capital lease of property, plant and equipment

$
-

$
66

~~See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.~~

-5-

~~Table of Contents~~

TRIO-TECH INTERNATIONAL AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED ~~FINANCI~~ALFINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT EARNINGS PER SHARE AND NUMBER OF SHARES)

1. ORGANIZATION AND BASIS OF PRESENTATION

Trio-Tech International ~~(“the Company”~~(the "Company” or “TTI” hereafter) was incorporated in fiscal ~~year~~ 1958 under the laws of the State of California. TTI provides third-party semiconductor testing and burn-in services primarily through its laboratories in Southeast Asia. In addition, TTI operates testing facilities in the United States. The Company also designs, develops, manufactures and markets a broad range of equipment and systems used in the manufacturing and testing of semiconductor devices and electronic components. In ~~the first quarter of~~ fiscal ~~year~~ 2015 TTI conducted business in the foregoing four ~~business~~ segments: Manufacturing, Testing Services, Distribution and Real Estate. TTI has subsidiaries in the U.S., Singapore, Malaysia, Thailand and China as follows:

	Ownership		Location

Express Test Corporation (Dormant)	100%		Van Nuys, California
Trio-Tech Reliability Services (Dormant)	100%		Van Nuys, California
KTS Incorporated, dba Universal Systems (Dormant)	100%		Van Nuys, California
European Electronic Test Centre (Dormant)	100%		Dublin, Ireland
Trio-Tech International Pte. Ltd.	100%		Singapore
Universal (Far East) Pte. Ltd. *	100%		Singapore
Trio-Tech International (Thailand) Co. Ltd. *	100%	Bangkok, Thailand
Trio-Tech (Bangkok) Co. Ltd.	100%	Bangkok, Thailand
~~Trio-Tech (Bangkok) Co. Ltd.~~ (49% owned by Trio-Tech International Pte. Ltd. and 51% owned by Trio-Tech International (Thailand) Co. Ltd.)	~~100%~~		~~Bangkok, Thailand~~
Trio-Tech (Malaysia) Sdn. Bhd. (55% owned by Trio-Tech International Pte. Ltd.)	55%		Penang and Selangor, Malaysia
Trio-Tech (Kuala Lumpur) Sdn. Bhd.	55%	Selangor, Malaysia
(100% owned by Trio-Tech Malaysia Sdn. Bhd.)
Prestal Enterprise Sdn. Bhd.	~~55%~~76%		Selangor, Malaysia
~~Prestal Enterprise Sdn. Bhd.~~ (76% owned by Trio-Tech International Pte. Ltd.)	~~76%~~		~~Selangor, Malaysia~~
Trio-Tech (Suzhou) Co. Ltd. *	100%		Suzhou, China
Trio-Tech (Shanghai) Co. Ltd. * (Dormant)	100%		Shanghai, China
Trio-Tech (Chongqing) Co. Ltd. *	100%		Chongqing, China
SHI International Pte. Ltd. (Dormant) (55% owned by Trio-Tech International Pte. Ltd)	55%		Singapore
PT SHI Indonesia (Dormant) (100% owned by SHI International Pte. Ltd.)	55%		Batam, Indonesia
Trio-Tech (Tianjin) Co. Ltd. *	100%		Tianjin, China

* 100% owned by Trio-Tech International Pte. Ltd.

-6-

The accompanying ~~un-audited~~unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. All significant inter-company accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. The unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements are presented in U.S. dollars. The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements do not include all the information and footnotes required by generally accepted accounting principles for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring adjustments) considered necessary for fair presentation have been included. Operating results for the ~~three~~six months ended ~~September 30,~~December 31, 2014 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2015. For further information, refer to the consolidated financial statements and footnotes thereto included in the Company's annual report for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2014.

~~-6-~~

~~Table of Contents~~

2. NEW ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

The Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) amended ASU 2014-15 to define management’s responsibility to evaluate whether there is substantial doubt about an organization’s ability to continue as a going concern and to provide related footnote disclosures.

Under GAAP, financial statements are prepared under the presumption that the reporting organization will continue to operate as a going concern, except in limited circumstances. The going concern basis of accounting is critical to financial reporting because it establishes the fundamental basis for measuring and classifying assets and liabilities.

Currently, GAAP lacks guidance about management’s responsibility to evaluate whether there is substantial doubt about the organization’s ability to continue as a going concern or to provide related footnote disclosures.

~~This~~ ASU 2014-15 provides guidance to an organization’s management, with principles and definitions that are intended to reduce diversity in the timing and content of disclosures that are commonly provided by organizations today in the financial statement footnotes.

The amendments in ~~the~~ ASU 2014-15 are effective for annual periods ending after December 15, 2016, and interim periods within annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016. ~~Early~~While early application is permitted for annual or interim reporting periods for which the financial statements have not previously been ~~issued.~~issued, the Company has not elected to early adopt. The adoption of this update is not expected to have a significant effect on the Company’s consolidated financial position or results of operations.

FASB has issued converged standards on revenue recognition. Specifically, the Board has issued ~~the following document:~~FASB Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-09 (“ASU 2014-09”), Revenue from Contracts with Customers: Topic 606.

·	~~FASB Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2014-09,~~ ~~Revenue from Contracts with Customers: Topic 606~~

ASU 2014-09 affects any entity using U.S. GAAP that either enters into contracts with customers to transfer goods or services or enters into contracts for the transfer of nonfinancial assets unless those contracts are within the scope of other standards (e.g., insurance contracts or lease contracts). ~~This~~ ASU 2014-09 will supersede the revenue recognition requirements in Topic 605, Revenue Recognition, and most industry-specific guidance. ~~This~~ ASU 2014-09 also supersedes some cost guidance included in Subtopic 605-35, Revenue Recognition—Construction-Type and Production-Type Contracts. In addition, the existing requirements for the recognition of a gain or loss on the transfer of nonfinancial assets that are not in a contract with a customer (e.g., assets within the scope of Topic 360, Property, Plant, and Equipment, and intangible assets within the scope of Topic 350, Intangibles—Goodwill and Other) are amended to be consistent with the guidance on recognition and measurement (including the constraint on revenue) in ~~this ASU.~~ASU 2014-09.

For a public entity, the amendments in ~~this~~ ASU 2014-09 are effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016, including interim periods within that reporting period. Early application is not permitted. The adoption of this update is not expected to have a significant effect on the Company’s consolidated financial position or results of operations.

The FASB has issued ASU No. 2014-08 (“ASU 2014-08”), Presentation of Financial Statements (“Topic 205”) and Property, Plant, and Equipment (“Topic 360”): Reporting Discontinued Operations and Disclosures of Disposals of Components of an Entity. The amendments in ~~the~~ ASU 2014-08 change the criteria for reporting discontinued operations while enhancing disclosures in this area. It also addresses sources of confusion and inconsistent application related to financial reporting of discontinued operations guidance in U.S. GAAP.

-7-

Under the new guidance, only disposals representing a strategic shift in operations should be presented as discontinued operations. Those strategic shifts should have a major effect on the organization’s operations and financial results. Examples include a disposal of a major geographic area, a major line of business, or a major equity method investment.

In addition, the new guidance requires expanded disclosures about discontinued operations that will provide financial statement users with more information about the assets, liabilities, income, and expenses of discontinued operations.

~~-7-~~

~~Table of Contents~~

The new guidance also requires disclosure of the pre-tax income attributable to a disposal of a significant part of an organization that does not qualify for discontinued operations reporting. This disclosure will provide users with information about the ongoing trends in a reporting organization’s results from continuing operations.

The amendments in the ASU 2014-08 are effective in the first quarter of 2015 for public organizations with calendar year ends. For most nonpublic organizations, it is effective for annual financial statements with fiscal years beginning on or after December 15, 2014. Early adoption is permitted. The adoption of this update isdid not ~~expected to~~ have a significant effect on the Company’s consolidated financial position or results of operations.

Other new pronouncements issued but not yet effective until ~~September 30,~~December 31, 2014 are not expected to have a significant effect on the Company’s consolidated financial position or results of operations.

3. INVENTORIES

Inventories consisted of the following:

	Dec. 31, 2014			June 30, 2014
	(Unaudited)
Raw materials	$	975		$	1,165
Work in progress		861			583
Finished goods		430			184
Less: provision for obsolete inventory		(740	)		(844	)
Currency translation effect		(76	)		18
	$	1,450		$	1,106

Sept. 30,
2014
(Unaudited)

June 30,
2014

Raw materials $ 1,234 $ 1,165
Work in progress 980 583
Finished goods 148 184
Less: provision for obsolete inventory (841 ) (844 )
Currency translation effect (27 ) 18
$ 1,494 $ 1,106

The following table represents the changes in provision for obsolete inventory:

							Dec. 31,			June 30,
	Sept. 30, 2014 (Unaudited)			June 30, 2014			2014			2014
							(Unaudited)
Beginning	$	844		$	912		$	844		$	912
Additions charged to expenses		12			-			26			-
Usage - disposition		(3	)		(76	)		(99	)		(76	)
Currency translation effect		(12	)		8			(31	)		8
Ending	$	841		$	844		$	740		$	844

-8-

4. STOCK OPTIONS

On September 24, 2007, the Company’s Board of Directors unanimously adopted the 2007 Employee Stock Option Plan (the “2007 Employee Plan”) and the 2007 Directors Equity Incentive Plan (the “2007 Directors Plan”) each of which was approved by the shareholders on December 3, 2007. Each of those plans was amended by the Board in 2010 to increase the number of shares covered thereby, which amendments were approved by the shareholders on December 14, 2010. At present, the 2007 Employee Plan provides for awards of up to 600,000 shares of the Company’s Common Stock to ~~its~~ employees, consultants and advisors. The Board also amended the 2007 Directors Plan in November 2013 to further increase the number of shares covered thereby from 400,000 shares to 500,000 shares, which amendment was approved by the shareholders on December 9, 2013. ~~At present, the~~The 2007 Directors Plan provides for awards of up to 500,000 shares of the Company’s Common Stock to the members of the ~~Company’s~~ Board of Directors in the form of non-qualified options and restricted stock. These two plans are administered by the Board, which also establishes the terms of the awards.

~~-8-~~

~~Table of Contents~~

Assumptions

The fair value for the options granted were estimated using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following weighted average assumptions, assuming no expected dividends:

Three Months Ended
September 30,

Three Months Ended
September 30,
2014 2013

Expected volatility 70.01% - 104.94 % 70.01 %
Risk-free interest rate 0.30% - 0.78 % 0.39% - 0.78 %
Expected life (years) 2.50 - 3.25 2 - 3

	Six Months Ended December 31,2014		Year Ended June 30, 2014

Expected volatility		71.44% to 104.94%		70.01% to 104.94%
Risk-free interest rate	0.30% to 0.78%		0.30% to 0.78%
Expected life (years)		2.50		2.50 to 3.25

The expected volatilities are based on the historical volatility of the Company’s stock. ~~The~~Due to higher volatility, the observation is made on a ~~weekly basis.~~daily basis for the six months ended December 31, 2014. The observation period covered is consistent with the expected life of options. The expected life of the options granted to employees has been determined utilizing the “simplified” method as prescribed by ASC Topic 718 Stock Based Compensation, which, among other provisions, ~~allowed~~allows companies without access to adequate historical data about employee exercise behavior to use a simplified approach for estimating the expected life of a "plain vanilla" option grant. The simplified rule for estimating the expected life of such an option ~~was~~is the average of the time to vesting and the full term of the option. The risk-free rate is consistent with the expected life of the stock options and is based on the United States Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant.

2007 Employee Stock Option Plan

The Company’s 2007 Employee Plan permits the grant of stock options to its employees covering up to an aggregate of 600,000 shares of Common Stock. Under the 2007 Employee Plan, all options must be granted with an exercise price of not less than fair value as of the grant date and the options granted must be exercisable within a maximum of ten years after the date of grant, or such lesser period of time as is set forth in the stock option agreements. The options may be exercisable (a) immediately as of the effective date of the stock option agreement granting the option, or (b) in accordance with a schedule related to the date of the grant of the option, the date of first employment, or such other date as may be set by the Compensation Committee. Generally, options granted under the 2007 Employee Plan are exercisable within five years after the date of grant, and vest over the period as follows: 25% vesting on the grant date and the remaining balance vesting in equal installments on the next three succeeding anniversaries of the grant date. The share-based compensation will be recognized in terms of the grade method on a straight-line basis for each separately vesting portion of the award. Certain option awards provide for accelerated vesting if there is a change in control (as defined in the 2007 Employee Plan).

The Company did not grant any options pursuant to the 2007 Employee Plan during the ~~three~~six months ended ~~September 30, 2014. There were no options exercised during the three months ended September 30,~~December 31, 2014. The Company recognized stock-based compensation expenses of $9$7 in the ~~three~~six months ended ~~September 30,~~December 31, 2014 under the 2007 Employee Plan. The balance of unamortized stock-based compensation of ~~$27~~$20 based on fair value on the grant date related to options granted under the 2007 Employee Plan is ~~expected~~ to be recognized over a period of two years.

~~The~~During the three and six months ended December 31, 2013, the Company granted stock options covering 15,000 and 35,000 shares of Common Stock respectively, to certain employees pursuant to the 2007 Employee Plan. The exercise price of these stock options equal to the fair value of the Company’s Common Stock (as defined under the 2007 Employee Plan in conformity with Regulation 409A of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended) the dates of grant, September 17, 2013 and December 9, 2013, respectively. The stock options covering ~~a total~~15,000 shares vested as of the grant date, while the stock options covering 35,000 shares vest over the period as follows: 25% vesting on the grant date and the remaining balance vesting in equal installments on the next three succeeding anniversaries of the grant date. The fair values as of December 31, 2013 of the options to purchase 15,000 and 35,000 shares of the Company’s Common Stock were approximately $22 and $3, respectively, based on the fair values of $1.52 and $2.04 per share, respectively, determined by using the Black Scholes option pricing model.

No stock options were exercised during the three ~~months~~and six month period ended ~~September 30,~~December 31, 2014.

-9-

Stock options to purchase 121,500 shares of Common Stock were exercised during the six month period ended December 31, 2013. The total proceeds received were $230. The Company recognized stock-based compensation expenses of ~~$22~~$25 in the ~~three~~six months ended ~~September 30,~~December 31, 2013 under the 2007 Employee Plan. ~~These options vested as~~The balance of unamortized stock-based compensation of $43 based on fair value on the grant ~~date.~~date related to options granted under the 2007 Employee Plan is to be recognized over a period of three years.

As of ~~September 30,~~December 31, 2014, there were vested employee stock options that were exercisable covering a total of ~~103,750~~112,500 shares of Common Stock. The weighted-average exercise price was ~~$4.14~~$4.06 and the weighted average contractual term was ~~1.85~~1.78 years. The ~~aggregate intrinsic~~total fair value of ~~employees’~~vested and outstanding employee stock options ~~outstanding and the aggregate intrinsic value of employees’ stock options exercisable~~ as of ~~September 30,~~December 31, 2014 ~~were $31 and $10, respectively.~~was $456.

As of ~~September 30,~~December 31, 2013, there were vested employee stock options covering a total of ~~147,625~~125,750 shares of Common Stock. The weighted-average exercise price was ~~$2.95~~$3.72 and the weighted average remaining contractual term was ~~1.49~~2.20 years. ~~Both the aggregate intrinsic~~The total fair value of ~~employees’~~vested employee stock options ~~outstanding and the aggregate intrinsic value of employees’ stock options exercisable~~ as of ~~September 30,~~December 31, 2013 was ~~$78.~~

~~-9-~~

~~Table of Contents~~

$467.

A summary of option activities under the 2007 Employee Plan during the ~~three months~~six month period ended ~~September 30,~~December 31, 2014 is presented as follows:

	Options		Weighted Average Exercise Price		Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Term (Years)		Aggregate Intrinsic Value		Options		Weighted Average Exercise Price		Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Term (Years)		Aggregate Intrinsic Value
Outstanding at July 1, 2014		130,000	$	3.93		2.57	$	13		130,000	$	3.93		2.57	$	13
Granted		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
Exercised		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
Forfeited or expired		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
Outstanding at September 30, 2014		130,000	$	3.93		2.33	$	31
Exercisable at September 30, 2014		103,750	$	4.14		1.85	$	10
Outstanding at December 31, 2014										130,000	$	3.93		2.07	$	-
Exercisable at December 31, 2014										112,500	$	4.06		1.78	$	-

No stock options were exercised during the ~~three~~six months ended ~~September 30,~~December 31, 2014.

A summary of option activities under the 2007 Employee Plan during the ~~three months~~six month period ended ~~September 30,~~December 31, 2013 is presented as follows:

	Options			Weighted Average Exercise Price			Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Term (Years)		Aggregate Intrinsic Value			Options			Weighted Average Exercise Price			Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Term (Years)		Aggregate Intrinsic Value
Outstanding at July 1, 2013		263,500		$	3.06			1.57	$	122			263,500		$	3.06			1.57	$	122
Granted		15,000			3.62			4.96		-			50,000			3.26			4.87		-
Exercised		(73,000	)		1.72			-		(111	)		(121,500	)		(1.90	)		-		(181	)
Forfeited or expired		(37,500	)		(4.81	)		-		-			(40,000	)		(4.72	)		-		-
Outstanding at September 30, 2013		168,000		$	3.28			1.57	$	78
Exercisable at September 30, 2013		147,625		$	2.95			1.49	$	78
Outstanding at December 31, 2013													152,000		$	3.61			2.67	$	45
Exercisable at December 31, 2013													125,750		$	3.72			2.20	$	38

~~During~~The fair value of the ~~three months ended September 30, 2013, options covering 73,000~~121,500 shares of common stock ~~were exercised. The intrinsic value~~acquired upon exercise of options ~~exercised~~ was ~~$111.~~$181. Cash received from the options exercised during the six months ended December 31, 2013 was ~~$126.~~approximately $230.

-10-

A summary of the status of the Company’s non-vested employee stock options during the ~~three~~six months ended ~~September 30,~~December 31, 2014 is presented below:

								Weighted Average Grant-Date
	Options		Weighted Average Grant-Date Fair Value		Options			Fair Value
Non-vested at July 1, 2014		26,250	$	1.69		26,250		$	1.69
Granted		-		-		-			-
Vested		-		-		(8,750	)		(1.69	)
Forfeited		-		-		-			-
Non-vested at September 30, 2014		26,250	$	1.69
Non-vested at December 31, 2014						17,500		$	1.69

A summary of the status of the Company’s non-vested employee stock options during the ~~three~~six months ended ~~September 30,~~December 31, 2013 is presented below:

Options
Weighted Average Grant-Date
Fair Value

Non-vested at July 1, 2013 20,375 $ 3.26
Granted 15,000 3.62
Vested (15,000 ) 3.62
Forfeited - -
Non-vested at September 30, 2013 20,375 $ 4.35

~~-10-~~

~~Table of Contents~~

				Weighted Average Grant-Date
	Options			Fair Value
Non-vested at July 1, 2013		20,375		$	3.29
Granted		50,000			1.65
Vested		(44,125	)		(2.33	)
Forfeited		-			-
Non-vested at December 31, 2013		26,250		$	1.69

2007 Directors Equity Incentive Plan

The 2007 Directors Plan permits the grant of options covering up to an aggregate of 500,000 shares of Common Stock to its non-employee directors in the form of non-qualified options and restricted stock. The exercise price of the non-qualified options is 100% of the fair value of the underlying shares on the grant date. The options have five-year contractual terms and are generally exercisable immediately as of the grant date.

During the first quarter of fiscal year 2015, the Company did not grant any options pursuant to the 2007 Directors Plan. There were no stock options exercised during the three month period ended September 30, 2014. The Company did not recognize any stock-based compensation expenses during the three months ended September 30, 2014.

~~During the three months ended September 30, 2013,~~On October 21, 2014, the Company granted options to purchase ~~60,000~~50,000 shares of its Common Stock to ~~certain of our~~ directors pursuant to the 2007 Directors Plan with an exercise price equal to the fair market value of ~~our~~ Common Stock (as defined under the 2007 Directors Plan in conformity with Regulation 409A or the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended) at the date of grant. The fair value of the options granted to purchase ~~60,000~~50,000 shares of the ~~Company's~~Company’s Common Stock was ~~$92~~approximately $82 based on the ~~grant date~~ fair value of ~~$1.52~~$3.81 per share determined by the Black Scholes option pricing model. ~~No stock options were exercised during the three month period ended September 30, 2013.~~

As of September 30, 2014, there were vested stock options granted under the 2007 Directors Plan covering a total of 315,000 shares of Common Stock. The weighted-average exercise price was $3.62 and the weighted average remaining contractual term was 2.37 years. Both the aggregate intrinsic value of such stock options outstanding and the aggregate intrinsic value of such options exercisable as of September 30, 2014 were $151. As all of the stock options granted under the 2007 Directors Plan vest immediately at the date of grant, there were no unvested stock options granted under the 2007 Directors Plan as of ~~September 30,~~December 31, 2014.

AsThe Company granted options to purchase 60,000 shares and 40,000 shares of ~~September 30, 2013, there were vested stock options granted~~its Common Stock to directors pursuant to the 2007 Directors Plan during the first and second quarters of fiscal 2014. The exercise price was equal to the fair market value of Common Stock (as defined under the 2007 Directors Plan ~~covering a total~~in conformity with Regulation 409A or the Internal Revenue Code of ~~340,000~~1986, as amended) at the date of respective grants. The fair value of the options granted to purchase 60,000 shares and 40,000 shares of the Company's Common ~~Stock. The weighted-average exercise price was $3.32~~Stock were approximately $92 and $83, respectively, based on the ~~weighted average remaining contractual term was 2.62 years. Both the aggregate intrinsic~~fair value of ~~such~~$1.52 and $1.61 per share, respectively, determined by the Black Scholes option pricing model.

-11-

No stock options ~~outstanding and~~were exercised during the ~~aggregate intrinsic value~~six months ended December 31, 2014.

Stock options to purchase 65,000 shares of ~~such options exercisable as~~its Common Stock were exercised during the six months ended December 31, 2013. The total proceeds received were $112. The Company recognized stock-based compensation expenses of ~~September 30, 2013 were $163. As, all~~$175 in the six months ended December 31, 2014 under the 2007 Directors Plan.

A summary of ~~the stock options granted~~option activities under the 2007 Directors Plan ~~vest immediately at~~during the ~~date of grant, there were no unvested stock options granted under the 2007 Directors Plan~~six months ended December 31, 2014 is presented as ~~of September 30, 2013.~~follows:

	Options		Weighted Average Exercise Price		Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Term (Years)		Aggregate Intrinsic Value
Outstanding at July 1, 2014		315,000	$	3.62		2.63	$	82
Granted		50,000		3.81		-		-
Exercised		-		-		-		-
Forfeited or expired		-		-		-		-
Outstanding at December 31, 2014		365,000	$	3.64		2.49	$	43
Exercisable at December 31, 2014		365,000	$	3.64		2.49		43

A summary of option activities under the 2007 Directors Plan during the ~~three~~six months ended ~~September 30, 2014 is presented as follows:~~

Options
Weighted Average
Exercise
Price

Weighted
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Term (Years)

Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value

Outstanding at July 1, 2014 315,000 $ 3.62 2.63 $ 24
Granted - - - -
Exercised - - - -
Forfeited or expired - - - -
Outstanding at September 30, 2014 315,000 $ 3.62 2.37 $ 151
Exercisable at September 30, 2014 315,000 $ 3.62 2.37 $ 151

~~A summary of option activities under the 2007 Directors Plan during the three months ended September 30,~~December 31, 2013 is presented as follows:

Options
Weighted Average
Exercise
Price

Weighted Average Remaining
Contractual
Term (Years)

Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value

Outstanding at July 1, 2013 340,000 $ 3.53 1.96 $ 80
Granted 60,000 3.62 4.96 -
Exercised - - - -
Forfeited or expired (60,000 ) (4.81 ) - -
Outstanding at September 30, 2013 340,000 $ 3.32 2.62 $ 163
Exercisable at September 30, 2013 340,000 $ 3.32 2.62 $ 163

~~-11-~~

~~Table of Contents~~

	Options			Weighted Average Exercise Price			Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Term (Years)		Aggregate Intrinsic Value
Outstanding at July 1, 2013		340,000		$	3.53			1.96	$	80
Granted		100,000			3.41			3.41		-
Exercised		(65,000	)		1.72			-		-
Forfeited or expired		(60,000	)		(4.81	)		-		-
Outstanding at December 31, 2013		315,000		$	3.62			3.12	$	82
Exercisable at December 31, 2013		315,000		$	3.62			3.12	$	82

5. EARNINGS PER SHARE

The Company adopted ASC Topic 260, Earnings Per Share. Basic EPS isare computed by dividing net income available to common shareholders (numerator) by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding (denominator) during the period. Diluted EPS give effect to all dilutive potential common shares outstanding during a period. In computing diluted EPS, the average price for the period is used in determining the number of shares assumed to be purchased from the exercise of stock ~~options.~~options and warrants.

Stock options to purchase ~~445,000~~495,000 shares of Common Stock at exercise prices ranging from $2.07 to $4.35 per share were outstanding as of ~~September 30,~~December 31, 2014 and were excluded in the computation of diluted EPS because ~~their effect would have been anti-dilutive. All the outstanding options were excluded in the computation of diluted EPS for the three months ended September 30, 2014 because~~ they were anti-dilutive.

Stock options to purchase ~~508,000~~467,000 shares of Common Stock at exercise prices ranging from $1.72 to $9.57 per share were outstanding as of ~~September 30, 2013. All the outstanding options~~December 31, 2013 and were excluded in the computation of diluted EPS ~~for the three months ended September 30, 2013~~ because they were anti-dilutive.

-12-

The following table is a reconciliation of the weighted average shares used in the computation of basic and diluted EPS for the years presented herein:

Three Months Ended

Sept. 30,
2014

Sept. 30,
2013

(Unaudited) (Unaudited)
(Loss) / income attributable to Trio-Tech International common shareholders from continuing operations, net of tax

$
(150
)

$
6

Income/ (loss) attributable to Trio-Tech International common shareholders from discontinued operations, net of tax

14

(23
)
Net loss attributable to Trio-Tech International common shareholders

$
(136
)

$
(17
)

Basic and diluted loss per share from continuing operations attributable to Trio-Tech International

(0.04
)

-

Basic and diluted loss per share from discontinued operations attributable to Trio-Tech International

-

(0.01
)
Basic and diluted loss per share from net loss attributable to Trio-Tech International

$
(0.04
)

$
(0.01
)

Weighted average number of common shares outstanding - basic

3,513

3,399

Dilutive effect of stock options

-

-

Number of shares used to compute earnings per share – diluted

3,513

3,399

	Six Months Ended						Three Months Ended
	Dec. 31,			Dec. 31,			Dec. 31,			Dec. 31,
	2014			2013			2014			2013
	(Unaudited)			(Unaudited)			(Unaudited)			(Unaudited)
(Loss) / income attributable to Trio-Tech International common shareholders from continuing operations, net of tax	$	(41	)	$	(342	)	$	97		$	(348	)
Income / (loss) attributable to Trio-Tech International common shareholders from discontinued operations, net of tax		11			(40	)		(3	)		(17	)
Net (loss) / income attributable to Trio-Tech International common shareholders	$	(30	)	$	(382	)	$	94		$	(365	)
Basic and diluted (loss) /earnings per share from continuing operations attributable to Trio-Tech International	$	(0.01	)		(0.10	)		0.03			(0.10	)
Basic and diluted loss per share from discontinued operations attributable to Trio-Tech International		-			(0.01	)		-			-
Basic and diluted (loss) / earnings per share from net (loss) / income attributable to Trio-Tech International	$	(0.01	)	$	(0.11	)	$	0.03		$	(0.10	)

Weighted average number of common shares outstanding - basic		3,513			3,508			3,513			3,508

Dilutive effect of stock options		-			-			-			-
Number of shares used to compute earnings per share - diluted		3,513			3,508			3,513			3,508

6. ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE AND ALLOWANCE FOR DOUBTFUL ACCOUNTS

Accounts receivable consists of customer obligations due under normal trade terms. Although management generally does not require collateral, letters of credit may be required from the customers in certain circumstances. Management periodically performs credit evaluations of the customers’ financial conditions.

Senior management reviews accounts receivable on a monthly basis to determine if any receivables will potentially be uncollectible. Management includes any accounts receivable balances that are determined to be uncollectible in the allowance for doubtful accounts. After all attempts to collect a receivable have failed, the receivable is written off against the allowance. Based on the information available to us, management believed the allowance for doubtful accounts as of ~~September 30,~~December 31, 2014 and June 30, 2014 was adequate.

The following table represents the changes in the allowance for doubtful accounts:

								Dec. 31,
								2014			June 30,
	Sept. 30, 2014 (Unaudited)			June 30, 2014			(Unaudited)				2014
Beginning	$	438		$	139			$	438		$	139
Additions charged to expenses		55			303				56			303
Recovered		-			(2	)
Recovered / write-off									-			(2	)
Currency translation effect		(8	)		(2	)			(17	)		(2	)
Ending	$	485		$	438			$	477		$	438

~~-12-~~-13-

~~Table of Contents~~

7. WARRANTY ACCRUAL

The Company provides for the estimated costs that may be incurred under its warranty program at the time the sale is recorded. The ~~Company provides a one-year~~ warranty period for products manufactured by ~~it.~~the Company is one year. The Company estimates the warranty costs based on the historical rates of warranty returns. The Company periodically assesses the adequacy of its recorded warranty liability and adjusts the amounts as necessary.

							Dec. 31,
							2014			June 30,
	Sept. 30, 2014 (Unaudited)			June 30, 2014			(Unaudited)			2014
Beginning	$	60		$	61		$	60		$	61
Additions charged to cost and expenses		-			23			3			23
Recovered		(4	)		(25	)		(5	)		(25	)
Actual usage		(2	)		-			(7	)		-
Currency translation effect		(4	)		1			(2	)		1
Ending	$	50		$	60		$	49		$	60

8. INCOME TAX

The Company had no material adjustments to its liabilities for unrecognized income tax benefits according to the provisions of ASC Topic 740 Income Tax. The Company had an income tax ~~benefit~~expense of ~~$46~~$132 and $86 for the three and six months ended ~~September 30,~~December 31, 2014, respectively, as compared to ~~$43~~the income tax benefit of $39 and $82, respectively, for the same ~~period~~periods in the last fiscal year.

The Company accrues penalties and interest related to unrecognized tax benefits when necessary as a component of penalties and interest expenses, respectively. The Company had not accrued any penalties or interest expenses relating to unrecognized benefits at ~~September~~June 30, 2014 and ~~June 30,~~December 31, 2014.

The major tax jurisdictions in which the Company files income tax returns are the United States, ~~China,~~ Singapore ~~Malaysia~~ and ~~Thailand.~~Malaysia. The statute of limitations, in general, is open for years 2004 to 2014 for tax authorities in those jurisdictions to audit or examine income tax returns. The Company is under annual review by the government of Singapore. However, the Company is not currently under tax examination in any other jurisdiction.

9. INVESTMENT PROPERTIES

The following table presents the Company’s investment in properties in China ~~and Malaysia~~ as of ~~September 30,~~December 31, 2014. The exchange rate is based on the exchange rate as of ~~September 30,~~December 31, 2014 published by the Monetary Authority of Singapore.

	Investment Date	Investment Amount (RMB)			Investment Amount (U.S. Dollars)			Investment Date	Investment Amount			Investment Amount
Purchase of rental property – Property I - MaoYe	Jan 04, 2008		5,554			894
Purchase of rental property – Property II - JiangHuai	Jan 06, 2010		3,600			580
									(RMB)			(U.S. Dollars)
Purchase of rental property – Property I – MaoYe								Jan 04, 2008		5,554			894
Purchase of rental property – Property II – JiangHuai								Jan 06, 2010		3,600			580
Purchase of rental property – Property III - Fu Li	Apr 08, 2010		4,025			648		Apr 08, 2010		4,025			648
Currency translation			-			22				-			3
Gross investment in rental property			13,179			2,144				13,179			2,125
Accumulated depreciation on rental property			(3,125	)		(508	)			(3,287	)		(530	)
Net investment in property – China			10,054			1,636				9,892			1,595

Investment Date

Investment
Amount
(RM)

Investment Amount
(U.S. Dollars)

Reclassification of rental property – Penang Property I Dec 31, 2012 681 208
Gross investment in rental property 681 208
Accumulated depreciation on rental property (302 ) (92 )
Net investment in property – Malaysia
379

116

~~-13-~~-14-

~~Table~~The following table presents the Company’s investment in properties in China as of ~~Contents~~June 30, 2014.

	Investment Date	Investment Amount			Investment Amount
		(RMB)			(U.S. Dollars)
Purchase of rental property – Property I – MaoYe	Jan 04, 2008		5,554		904
Purchase of rental property – Property II – JiangHuai	Jan 06, 2010		3,600		586
Purchase of rental property – Property III - Fu Li	Apr 08, 2010		4,025		655
Currency translation			-		(23	)
Gross investment in rental property			13,179		2,122
Accumulated depreciation on rental property			(2,961	)	(476	)
Net investment in property – China			10,218		1,646

The following table presents the Company’s investment in properties in ~~China and~~ Malaysia as of ~~June 30,~~December 31, 2014. The exchange rate is based on the exchange rate as of ~~June 30,~~December 31, 2014 published by the Monetary Authority of Singapore.

Investment Date

Investment
Amount
(RMB)

Investment Amount
(U.S. Dollars)

Purchase of rental property – Property I - MaoYe Jan 04, 2008 5,554 904
Purchase of rental property – Property II - JiangHuai Jan 06, 2010 3,600 586
Purchase of rental property – Property III - Fu Li Apr 08, 2010 4,025 655
Currency translation - (23 )
Gross investment in rental property 13,179 2,122
Accumulated depreciation on rental property (2,961 ) (476 )
Net investment in property – China 10,218 1,646

		(RM)		(U.S. Dollars)
Purchase of rental property – Penang Property I	Dec 31, 2012	681		196
Gross investment in rental property		681		196
Accumulated depreciation on rental property		(305	)	(88	)
Net investment in property – Malaysia		376		108

Investment Date

Investment
Amount
(RM)

Investment Amount
(U.S. Dollars)

Reclassification of rental property – Penang Property I Dec 31, 2012 681 212
Gross investment in rental property 681 212
Accumulated depreciation on rental property (300 ) (93 )
Net investment in property – Malaysia 381 119
The following table presents the Company’s investment in properties in Malaysia as of June 30, 2014.

		(RM)			(U.S. Dollars)
Purchase of rental property – Penang Property I	Dec 31, 2012		681			212
Gross investment in rental property			681			212
Accumulated depreciation on rental property			(300	)		(93	)
Net investment in property – Malaysia			381			119

Rental Property I ~~– Mao Ye~~- MaoYe

In fiscal ~~year~~ 2008, Trio-Tech (Chongqing) Co. Ltd. (“TTCQ”) purchased an office in Chongqing, China from MaoYe Property Ltd. (“MaoYe”), for a total cash purchase price of RMB 5,554, or approximately $894 based on the exchange rate as of ~~September 30,~~December 31, 2014 published by the Monetary Authority of Singapore. TTCQ rented this property to a third party on July 13, 2008. The term of the rental agreement was five years. The rental agreement was renewed on July 16, ~~2013~~2014 for a further period of five years. The rental agreement provides for a rent increase of 8% every year after July 15, 2015. The renewed agreement expires on July 15, 2018.

Property purchased from MaoYe generated a rental income of ~~$29,~~$30 and $59 for the three and six months ended ~~September 30,~~December 31, 2014, respectively, and ~~$28~~$29 and $57 for the same ~~period~~periods in the last fiscal ~~year.~~year, respectively.

-15-

Rental Property II - JiangHuai

In fiscal year 2010, TTCQ purchased eight units of commercial property in Chongqing, China from Chongqing JiangHuai Real Estate Development Co. Ltd., (“JiangHuai”) for a total purchase price of RMB 3,600, or approximately $580 based on the exchange rate as of ~~September 30,~~December 31, 2014 published by the Monetary Authority of Singapore. TTCQ rented all of these commercial units to a third party until the agreement expired in January 2012. TTCQ then rented three of the eight commercial units to another party during the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2013 under a rental agreement that expired on March 31, 2014. Currently all the units are vacant and TTCQ ishas been actively looking for suitable tenants for renting all the commercial units. TTCQ ishas yet to receive the title deed for these properties. TTCQ is in the legal process to obtain the title deed which is dependent on JiangHuai completing the entire project.

Property purchased from JiangHuai did not generate any rental income during the three and six months ended ~~September 30,~~December 31, 2014, while it generated a rental income of $4 and $9, respectively, for the same ~~period~~periods in the last fiscal year.

~~Other~~Rental Properties III – Fu Li

In fiscal ~~year~~ 2010, TTCQ entered into a Memorandum Agreement with Chongqing Fu Li Real Estate Development Co. Ltd. (“FuLi”) to purchase two commercial properties totaling 311.99 square meters (“office space”) located in Jiang Bei District Chongqing. Although TTCQ currently rents its office premises from a third party, it intends to use the office space as its office premises. The total purchase price committed and paid was RMB 4,025, or approximately $648 based on the exchange rate as of ~~September 30,~~December 31, 2014 published by the Monetary Authority of Singapore. The development was completed and the property was handed over during April ~~2012~~2013 and the title deed was received during the third quarter of fiscal ~~year 2013. One~~2014. The two commercial properties were leased to third parties under two separate rental agreements, one of ~~the two rental agreements~~which expired in April 2014 and the other of which expired in August 2014. For the unit for which the agreement expired in April 2014, a new tenant was identified and a new agreement has been executed, which expires on April 30, 2017. The new agreement carries an increase in ~~rental~~rent of 20% in the first year, as compared to the expired rental agreement. Thereafter the ~~rental~~rent increases by approximately 10% for the subsequent years until April 2017. For the unit for which the agreement expired in August 2014, a new tenant was identified and a new agreement has been executed, which expires on August 9, 2016. The new agreement carries an increase in rental of approximately 21% in the first year, as compared to the expired rental agreement. Thereafter the rent increases by approximately 6% for the subsequent years until August 2016.

~~-14-~~

~~Table of Contents~~

~~Properties~~Property purchased from Fu Li ~~were rented to a third party effective fourth quarter of fiscal year 2012 and~~ generated a rental income of $14 and $28 for the three and six months ended ~~September 30,~~December 31, 2014, respectively, while it generated a rental income of $12 and ~~$12~~$24, respectively, for the same ~~period~~periods in the last fiscal year.

Penang Property I

In the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2013, Trio-Tech Malaysia Sdn. Bhd. (“TTM”) determined to sell the factory building in Penang. However, as the government authorities did not approve the transaction, the sale did not take place. Because the market value was increasing during the second quarter of fiscal year 2013, TTM decided to hold the factory building in Penang as an investment rental property. Hence TTM reclassified the factory building as investment property at the end of the second quarter of fiscal year 2013, which had a net book value of RM ~~379~~376, or approximately ~~$116. In the first quarter of fiscal year 2015 the~~$108. The depreciation expenses were approximately ~~$1.~~$1 and $2 for the three and six months ended December 31, 2014, respectively. There were no such depreciation expenses for the same ~~period~~periods in the last fiscal year, since the asset was classified as “Assets held for sale.”

-16-

Summary

Total rental income for all investment properties (Property I, II and III) in China was ~~$43~~$44 and $87 for the three and six months ended ~~September 30,~~December 31, 2014, respectively, and was ~~$44~~$46 and $90, respectively, for the same ~~period~~periods in the last fiscal year.

Depreciation expenses for all investment properties in China were $27 and $54 for the three and six months ended ~~September 30,~~December 31, 2014, respectively, and ~~2013.~~were $26 and $54, respectively, for the same periods in the last fiscal year.

10. ~~LOANS~~LOAN RECEIVABLE FROM PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS

The following table presents TTCQ’s loan receivable from property development projects in China as of ~~September 30,~~December 31, 2014. The exchange rate is based on the date published by the Monetary Authority of Singapore as on ~~September 30,~~December 31, 2014.

Loan Expiry
Date
Loan Amount
(RMB)
Loan Amount
(U.S. Dollars)

Short-term loan receivables
JiangHuai (Project – Yu Jin Jiang An) May 31,2013 2,000 325
Less: allowance for impairment Dec 31, 2013 (2,000 ) (325 )
Net short-term loan receivables - -

Long-term loan receivables
Jun Zhou Zhi Ye Oct 31, 2016 5,000 814
Net loan-term loan receivables from property development projects 5,000 814

	Loan Expiry	Loan Amount			Loan Amount
Short-term loan receivables	Date	(RMB)			(U.S. Dollars)
JiangHuai (Project - Yu Jin Jiang An)	May 31, 2013		2,000			325
Less: allowance for impairment	Dec 31, 2013		(2,000	)		(325	)
Net loan receivable from property development projects			-			-

	Loan Expiry	Loan Amount			Loan Amount
Long-term loan receivables	Date	(RMB)			(U.S. Dollars)
Jun Zhou Zhi Ye	Oct 31, 2016		5,000			814
Less: transfer – down-payment for purchase of property			(5,000	)		(814	)
Net loan receivable from property development projects			-			-

The following table presents TTCQ’s loan receivable from property development projects in China as of June 30, 2014. ~~The exchange rate is based on the date published by the Monetary Authority of Singapore as on June 30, 2014.~~

Loan Expiry
Date

Loan Amount
(RMB)

Loan Amount
(U.S. Dollars)

Short-term loan receivables
JiangHuai (Project – Yu Jin Jiang An) May 31,2013 2,000 325
Less: allowance for impairment Dec 31, 2013 (2,000 ) (325 )
Net short-term loan receivables - -

Long-term loan receivables
Jun Zhou Zhi Ye Oct 31, 2016 5,000 805
Net loan-term loan receivables from property development projects 5,000 805

	Loan Expiry	Loan Amount			Loan Amount
Short-term loan receivables	Date	(RMB)			(U.S. Dollars)
Investment in JiangHuai (Project - Yu Jin Jiang An)	May 31, 2013		2,000			325
Less: allowance for doubtful receivables	Dec 31, 2013		(2,000	)		(325	)
Net loan receivable from property development projects			-			-

	Loan Expiry	Loan Amount		Loan Amount
Long-term loan receivables	Date	(RMB)		(U.S. Dollars)
Jun Zhou Zhi Ye	Oct 31, 2016		5,000		805
Net loan receivable from property development projects			5,000		805

~~-15-~~-17-

~~Table of Contents~~

On November 1, 2010, TTCQ entered into a Memorandum Agreement with JiaSheng Property Development Co. Ltd. (“JiaSheng”) to invest in their property development projects (Project B-48 Phase 2) located in Chongqing City, China. Due to the short-term nature of the investment, the amount was classified as a loan based on ASC Topic 310-10-25 Receivables, amounting to RMB 5,000, or approximately $814, based on the exchange rate as at ~~September 30,~~December 31, 2014 published by the Monetary Authority of Singapore. The amount was unsecured and repayable at the end of the term. The loan was renewed in November 2011 for a period of one year, which expired on October 31, 2012 and was again renewed in November 2012 and expired in November 2013. On November 1, 2013 the loan was transferred by JiaSheng to and is now payable by Chong Qing Jun Zhou Zhi Ye Co. Ltd. (“Jun Zhou Zhi Ye”), and the transferred agreement expires on October 31, 2016. Hence the loan receivable ~~has been~~was reclassified as a long-term ~~loan~~ receivable. The book value of the loan receivable approximates its fair value. TTCQ recorded other income of ~~$51, based on the average exchange rate~~RMB 104, or approximately $16, and RMB 417, or approximately $68, from Jun Zhou Zhi Ye for the three and six months ended ~~September 30,~~December 31, 2014, ~~published by the Monetary Authorities~~respectively. The loan receivable was transferred to down-payment for purchase of ~~Singapore, as compared to $49 for the same period~~property that is being developed in the ~~last year.~~Singapore Themed Resort Project.

On November 1, 2010, TTCQ entered into another Memorandum Agreement with JiangHuai Property Development Co. Ltd. (“JiangHuai”) to invest in their property development projects (Project - Yu Jin Jiang An) located in Chongqing City, China. Due to the short-term nature of the investment, the amount was classified as a loan based on ASC Topic 310-10-25 Receivables, amounting to RMB 2,000, or approximately $325. The ~~amount was secured by the underlying property and repayable at the end of the term. The~~ loan was renewed, but expired on May 31, ~~2013.~~2014. TTCQ is in the legal process of recovering the outstanding amount of $325. TTCQ did not generate other income from JiangHuai for ~~both~~ the ~~periods ending~~ three and six months ended ~~September 30,~~December 31, 2014, ~~and three months ended September 30, 2013.~~or for the same periods in the last fiscal year. An impairment of $325 was ~~recorded~~provided for during the second quarter of fiscal ~~quarter ended December 31, 2013.~~2014, based on TTI’s financial policy.

11. ~~INVESTMENTS~~BUSINESS SEGMENTS

In fiscal 2013, the Company operated in five segments: the testing service industry (which performs structural and electronic tests of semiconductor devices), the designing and manufacturing of equipment (which equipment tests the structural integrity of integrated circuits and other products), distribution of various products from other manufacturers in Singapore and Southeast Asia, the real estate segment in China and the fabrication services segment in Batam, Indonesia. In the fourth quarter of fiscal 2013, the Company discontinued operations in the fabrication segment. Hence, in fiscal 2014 and 2015, the Company operated in four segments.

The real estate segment recorded other income of $16 and $68, respectively, for the three and six months ended December 31, 2014 as compared to $51 and $102, respectively, for the same periods in the last fiscal year. Due to the short-term nature of the investments, the investments were classified as loan receivables based on ASC Topic 310-10-25 Receivables. Thus the investment income was classified under other income, which is not part of the below table.

The revenue allocated to individual countries was based on where the customers were located. The allocation of the cost of equipment, the current year investment in new equipment and depreciation expense have been made on the basis of the primary purpose for which the equipment was acquired.

All inter-segment revenue was from the manufacturing segment to the testing and distribution segments. Total inter-segment revenue was $97 and $142 for the three and six months ended December 31, 2014, respectively, as compared to $48 and $196, respectively, for the same periods in the last fiscal year. Corporate assets mainly consisted of cash and prepaid expenses. Corporate expenses mainly consisted of stock option expenses, salaries, insurance, professional expenses and directors' fees. Corporate expenses are allocated to the four segments. The following segment information table includes segment operating (loss) / income after including the Corporate expenses allocated to the segments, which gets eliminated in the consolidation.

The following segment information is un-audited for the six months ended December 31:

-18-

Business Segment Information:
	Six months			Operating					Depr.
	Ended	Net		(Loss)			Total		and		Capital
	Dec. 31,	Revenue		Income			Assets		Amort.		Expenditures
Manufacturing	2014	$	6,395	$	(735	)	$	13,460	$	70	$	23
	2013	$	8,569	$	(328	)	$	10,872	$	77	$	221

Testing Services	2014		9,691		1,274			14,896		1,065		870
	2013		8,645		391			19,331		1,067		1,500

Distribution	2014		817		-			678		-		6
	2013		1,532		199			418		-		-

Real Estate	2014		87		(91	)		3,686		54		-
	2013		90		(45	)		3,893		54		-

Fabrication *	2014		-		-			33		-		-
Services	2013		-		-			106		-		-

Corporate &	2014		-		(134	)		117		-		-
Unallocated	2013		-		(336	)		76		-		-

Total Company	2014	$	16,990	$	314		$	32,870	$	1,189	$	899
	2013	$	18,836	$	(119	)	$	34,696	$	1,198	$	1,721

The following segment information is un-audited for the three months ended December 31:

Business Segment Information:
	Three months			Operating					Depr.
	Ended	Net		(Loss)			Total		and		Capital
	Dec. 31,	Revenue		Income			Assets		Amort.		Expenditures
Manufacturing	2014	$	3,348	$	(117	)	$	13,460	$	43	$	6
	2013	$	4,368	$	(201	)	$	10,872	$	38	$	91

Testing Services	2014		5,073		687			14,896		496		426
	2013		4,597		289			19,331		531		1,146

Distribution	2014		432		36			678		-		-
	2013		328		7			418		-		-

Real Estate	2014		44		(44	)		3,686		27		-
	2013		46		(22	)		3,893		27		-

Fabrication *	2014		-		-			33		-		-
Services	2013		-		-			106		-		-

Corporate &	2014		-		(126	)		117		-		-
Unallocated	2013		-		(179	)		76		-		-

Total Company	2014	$	8,897	$	437		$	32,870	$	566	$	432
	2013	$	9,339	$	(106	)	$	34,696	$	596	$	1,237

* Fabrication services is a discontinued operation (Note 16).

-19-

12. NON-CONTROLLING INTEREST

In accordance with the provisions of ASC Topic 810 Consolidation, the Company has classified the non-controlling interest as a component of stockholders’ equity in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets. Additionally, the Company has presented the net income attributable to the Company and the non-controlling ownership interests separately in the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements.

Non-controlling interest represents the minority stockholders’ share of 45% of the equity of Trio-Tech Malaysia Sdn. Bhd., 45% interest in SHI International Pte. Ltd., and 24% interest in Prestal Enterprise Sdn. Bhd., which are subsidiaries of the Company.

The table below reflects a reconciliation of the equity attributable to non-controlling interest:

	Dec. 31, 2014			June 30, 2014
Non-controlling interest	(Unaudited)
Beginning balance	$	1,732		$	1,971
Net income		210			144
Dividend declared by a subsidiary		-			(313	)
Translation adjustment		(62	)		(70	)
Ending balance	$	1,880		$	1,732

13. FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS APPROXIMATE CARRYING VALUE

In accordance with the ASC Topic 825, the following presents assets and liabilities measured and carried at fair value and classified by level of the following fair value measurement hierarchy:

(a) quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1);

(b) inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly (i.e. as prices) or indirectly (i.e. derived from prices) (Level 2); and

There were no transfers between Levels 1 and 2 during the year.

Term deposits (Level 1) – the carrying amount approximates fair value because of the short maturity of these instruments.

Loans receivable from property development projects (Level 3) – the carrying amount approximates fair value because of the short-term nature.

Restricted term deposits (Level 1) – the carrying amount approximates fair value because of the short maturity of these instruments.

Lines of credit (Level 3) – the carrying value of the lines of credit approximates fair value due to the short-term nature of the obligations.

Bank loans payable (Level 3) – the carrying value of the Company’s bank loan payables approximates its fair value as the interest rates associated with long-term debt is adjustable in accordance with market situations when the Company borrowed funds with similar terms and remaining maturities.

-20-

14. BANK LOANS PAYABLE

Bank loans payable consisted of the following:

	Dec. 31, 2014			June 30, 2014
	(Unaudited)
Note payable denominated in Malaysian ringgit to a commercial bank for infrastructure investment, maturing in August 2024, bearing interest at the bank’s prime rate (4.6% - 5.1% at December 31, 2014) per annum, with monthly payments of principal plus interest through August 2024, collateralized by the acquired building with the net book value of Malaysian ringgit 12,016, or approximately $3,438.	$	2,476		$	2,786

Note payable denominated in U.S. dollars to a financial institution for working capital plans in Singapore and its subsidiaries, maturing in December 2014, bearing interest at the bank’s prime rate plus 1.50% (5.1% at December 31, 2014) per annum, with monthly payments of principal plus interest through December 2014. This note payable is secured by plant and equipment with the net book value of Singapore dollars 585, or approximately $443.		-			260

Current portion		(178	)		(448	)
Long term portion of bank loans payable	$	2,298		$	2,598

Future minimum payments (excluding interest) as at December 31, 2014 were as follows:

2015	$	178
2016		187
2017		197
2018		208
2019		218
Thereafter		1,488
Total obligations and commitments	$	2,476

Future minimum payments (excluding interest) as at June 30, 2014 were as follows:

2015	$	448
2016		198
2017		209
2018		220
2019		138
Thereafter		1,833
Total obligations and commitments	$	3,046

15. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

Trio-Tech (Malaysia) Sdn. Bhd. has expansion plans to meet the growing demands of a major customer in Malaysia, as the existing facility is inadequate to meet the demands of that customer. The Company has capital commitments for the purchase of equipment and other related infrastructure costs amounting to RM 1,813, or approximately $519 based on the exchange rate as on December 31, 2014 published by the Monetary Authority of Singapore, in the Malaysia operations.

Trio-Tech (Tianjin) Co. Ltd. in China has capital commitments for the purchase of equipment and other related infrastructure costs amounting to RMB 307, or approximately $50 based on the exchange rate as on December 31, 2014 published by the Monetary Authority of Singapore.

Trio-Tech International Pte. Ltd. in Singapore has capital commitments for the purchase of equipment and other related infrastructure costs amounting to SGD 59, or approximately $45 based on the exchange rate as on December 31, 2014 published by the Monetary Authority of Singapore.

-21-

16. DISCONTINUED OPERATION AND CORRESPONDING RESTRUCTURING PLAN

The Company’s Indonesia operation and the Indonesia operation’s immediate holding company, which comprise the fabrication services segment, suffered continued operating losses in the past four fiscal years, and the cash flow was minimal for the past four years. The Company established a restructuring plan to close the fabrication services operation, and in accordance with ASC Topic 205-20, Presentation of Financial Statement Discontinued Operations (“ASC Topic 250-20”), the Company presented the operation results from fabrication services as a discontinued operation, as the Company believed that no continued cash flow would be generated by the discontinued component and that the Company would have no significant continuing involvement in the operations of the discontinued component. In accordance with the restructuring plan, the Company’s Indonesia operation is negotiating with its suppliers to settle the outstanding balance of accounts payable of $83 and has no collection for accounts receivable. The Company’s fabrication operation in Indonesia is in the process of winding down.

In January 2010, the Company established a restructuring plan to close the Testing operation in Shanghai, China. Based on the restructuring plan and in accordance with ASC Topic 205-20, the Company presented the operation results from Shanghai as a discontinued operation, as the Company believed that no continued cash flow would be generated by the discontinued component (Shanghai subsidiary) and that the Company would have no significant continuing involvement in the operations of the discontinued component. The Shanghai operation has an outstanding balance of accounts payable of $38 and is collecting the accounts receivable of $2.

The discontinued operations in Shanghai and in Indonesia incurred general and administrative expenses of $18, for both the three and six months ended December 31, 2014, and $3 and $7, respectively, for the same periods in the last fiscal year. The Company anticipates that it may incur additional costs and expenses at the time of winding down the business of the subsidiaries through which the facilities operated.

Income / (loss) from discontinued operations was as follows:

	Six Months Ended						Three Months Ended
	Dec. 31,			Dec. 31,			Dec. 31,			Dec. 31,
	2014			2013			2014			2013
	Unaudited			Unaudited			Unaudited			Unaudited

Revenue	$	-		$	-		$	-		$	-
Cost of sales		-			3			-			-

Gross loss		-			(3	)		-			-
Operating expenses:
General and administrative		18			7			18			3
Total		18			7			18			3

Loss from discontinued operations		(18	)		(10	)		(18	)		(3	)

Other income / (expenses)		38			(62	)		12			(27	)

Income/ (loss) from discontinued operations	$	20		$	(72	)	$	(6	)	$	(30	)

The Company does not provide a separate cash flow statement for the discontinued operation, as the impact of the discontinued operation was immaterial.

-22-

17. INVESTMENTS

During the second quarter of fiscal year 2011, the Company entered into a joint-venture agreement with JiaSheng to develop real estate projects in China. The Company invested RMB 10,000, or approximately $1,606 based on the exchange rate as of March 31, 2014 published by the Monetary Authority of Singapore, for a 10% interest in the newly formed joint venture, which was incorporated as a limited liability company, Chong Qing Jun Zhou Zhi Ye Co. Ltd. (the “joint venture”), in China. The agreement stipulated that the Company would nominate two of the five members of the Board of Directors of the joint venture and had the ability to assign two members of management to the joint venture. The agreement also stipulated that the Company would receive a fee of RMB 10,000, or approximately $1,606 based on the exchange rate as of March 31, 2014 published by the Monetary Authority of Singapore, for the services rendered in connection with obtaining priority to bid in certain real estate projects from the local government. Upon signing of the agreement, JiaSheng paid the Company RMB 5,000 in cash, or approximately $803 based on the exchange rate published by the Monetary Authority of Singapore as of March 31, 2014. The remaining RMB 5,000, which was not recorded as a receivable as the Company considered the collectability uncertain, would be paid over 72 months commencing in 36 months from the date of the agreement when the joint venture secured a property development project stated inside the joint venture agreement. The Company considered the RMB 5,000, or approximately $803 based on the exchange rate as of March 31, 2014 published by the Monetary Authority of Singapore, received in cash from JiaSheng, the controlling venturer in the joint venture, as a partial return of the Company’s initial investment of RMB 10,000, or approximately $1,606 based on the exchange rate as of March 31, 2014 published by the Monetary Authority of Singapore. Therefore, the RMB 5,000 received in cash was offset against the initial investment of RMB 10,000, resulting in a net investment of RMB 5,000 as of March 31, 2014. The Company further reduced its investments by RMB 137, or approximately $22, towards the losses from operations incurred by the joint-venture, resulting in a net investment of RMB 4,863, or approximately $781 based on exchange rates published by the Monetary Authority of Singapore as of March 31, 2014.

“Investment” as shown in the balance sheet consists of the cost of an investment in a joint venture in which we have a 10% interest. During the second quarter of fiscal year 2014, TTCQ disposed of its 10% interest in the joint venture. The joint venture had to raise funds for the development of the project. As a joint-venture partner, TTCQ was required to stand guarantee for the funds to be borrowed; considering the amount of borrowing, the risk involved was higher than the investment made and hence TTCQ decided to dispose of the 10% interest in the joint venture investment. On October 2, 2013, TTCQ entered into a share transfer agreement with Zhu Shu. Based on the agreement the purchase price was to be paid by (1) RMB 10,000 worth of commercial property in Chongqing China,, or approximately $1,634 based on exchange rates published by the Monetary Authority of Singapore as of October 2, 2013, by non-monetary consideration and (2) the remaining RMB 8,000, or approximately $1,307 based on exchange rates published by the Monetary Authority of Singapore as of October 2, 2013, by cash consideration. The consideration consists of (1) commercial units measuring 668 square meters to be delivered in June 2016 and (2) sixteen quarterly equal installments of RMB 500 per quarter commencing from January 2014. Based on ASC Topic 845 Non-monetary Consideration, the Company deferred the recognition of the gain on disposal of the 10% interest in joint venture investment until such time that the consideration is paid, so that the gain can be ascertained. The recorded value of the disposed investment amounting to $783, based on exchange rates published by the Monetary Authority of Singapore as of June 30, 2014, is classified as “other assets” under non-current assets, because it is considered a down payment for the purchase of the commercial property in Chongqing. The first installment amount of RMB 500 was due in January 2014 and was outstanding as at March 31, 2014. The second and third installment amounts of RMB 500 each were due in April 2014 and July 2014. During May 2014, TTCQ had received RMB 100. ~~As at the date of this 10-Q report the remaining amounts are still outstanding.~~

~~-16-~~

~~Table of Contents~~

~~12. NON-CONTROLLING INTEREST~~

~~In accordance with the provisions of ASC Topic 810~~ ~~Consolidation,~~ the Company has classified the non-controlling interest as a component of stockholders’ equity in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets. Additionally, the Company has presented the net income attributable to the Company and the non-controlling ownership interests separately in the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements.

~~13. BUSINESS SEGMENTS~~

In fiscal year 2015, the Company operates in four segments; the testing service industry (which performs structural and electronic tests of semiconductor devices), the designing and manufacturing of equipment (which equipment tests the structural integrity of integrated circuits and other products), distribution of various products from other manufacturers in Singapore and Southeast Asia and the real estate segment in China.

The real estate segment recorded other income of $51 and $49, for the first quarter of fiscal year 2015 and fiscal year 2014, respectively, based on the average exchange rate for the respective periods published by the Monetary Authority of Singapore. Due to the short-term nature of the investment, the amount was classified as a loan receivable based on ASC Topic 310-10-25 ~~Receivables, hence the investment income was also classified under other income, which is not part of the below table.~~

All inter-segment revenue was from the manufacturing segment to the testing and distribution segments. Total inter-segment revenue was $45 for the three months ending September 30, 2014, as compared to $255 for the same period in the last fiscal year. Corporate assets mainly consisted of cash and prepaid expenses. Corporate expenses mainly consisted of stock option expenses, salaries, insurance, professional expenses and directors' fees. Corporate expenses are allocated to the four segments. The following segment information table includes segment operating (loss) / income after including the corporate expenses allocated to the segments, which gets eliminated in the consolidation.

~~The following segment information is un-audited for the three months ended September 30, 2014 and September 30, 2013:~~

~~Business Segment Information:~~

Three Months
Ended
Sept. 30,

Net
Revenue

Operating
(Loss)
Income

Total
Assets

Depr.
And
Amort.

Capital
Expenditures

Manufacturing
2014
$ 3,047 $ (618 ) $ 10,437 $ 27 $ 17

2013
4,201 (127 ) 11,869 39 130

Testing Services
2014
4,618 576 18,471 569 444

2013
4,048 102 18,149 536 354

Distribution
2014
385 (36 ) 494 - 6

2013
1,204 192 678 - -

Real Estate
2014
43 (48 ) 3,807 27 -

2013
44 (23 ) 4,134 27 -

Fabrication
2014
- - 51 - -
Services *
2013
- - 126 - -

Corporate &
2014
- (8 ) 75 - -
Unallocated
2013
- (157 ) 79 - -

Total Company
2014
$ 8,093 $ (134 ) $ 33,335 $ 623 $ 467

2013
$ 9,497 $ (13 ) $ 35,035 $ 602 $ 484

* ~~Fabrication Services is a discontinued operation (Note 19).~~

~~-17-~~-23-

~~Table of Contents~~

~~14. FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS APPROXIMATE CARRYING VALUE~~

~~In accordance with ASC Topic 825, the Company considers the following:~~

~~Term deposits – The carrying amount approximates fair value because of the short maturity of these instruments.~~

~~Loan receivables from property development projects – The carrying amount approximates fair value because of the short-term nature.~~

~~Restricted term deposits – The carrying amount approximates fair value because of the short maturity of these instruments.~~

~~Lines of credit – The carrying value of the lines of credit approximates fair value due to their short-term nature of the obligations.~~

Bank loans payable – The carrying value of the Company’s bank loan payables approximates its fair value as the interest rates associated with long-term debt is adjustable in accordance with market situations when the Company borrowed funds with similar terms and remaining maturities.

~~15. BANK LOANS PAYABLE~~

~~Bank loans payable consisted of the following:~~

Sept. 30, 2014
(Unaudited)
June 30, 2014
Note payable denominated in Malaysian ringgit to a commercial bank for infrastructure investment, maturing in August 2024, bearing interest at the bank’s prime rate (4.6% and 5.1% at September 30, 2014) per annum, with monthly payments of principal plus interest through August 2024, collateralized by the acquired building with a carrying value of $3,804.

2,692

2,786

Note payable denominated in U.S., dollars to a financial institution for working capital plans in Singapore and its subsidiaries, maturing in December 2014, bearing interest at the bank’s prime rate plus 1.50% (4.75% at September 30, 2014) with monthly payments of principal plus interest through December 2014. This note payable is secured by plant and equipment with a carrying value of $429.

104

260

Current portion

(292
)

(448
)
Long term portion of bank loans payable

$
2,504

$
2,598

~~Future minimum payments (excluding interest) as at September 30, 2014 and June 30, 2014~~

~~were as follows:~~

2015
$ 292 $ 448
2016
197 198
2017
208 209
2018
219 220
2019
230 138
Thereafter
1,650 1,833
Total obligations and commitments
$ 2,796 $ 3,046

Carrying value of the Company’s bank loan payable approximates its fair value because the interest rates associated with long-term debt are adjustable in accordance with market situations when the Company borrowed funds with similar terms and remaining maturities.

~~-18-~~

~~Table of Contents~~

~~16. LINES OF CREDIT~~

Carrying value of the Company’s lines of credit approximates its fair value because the interest rates associated with the lines of credit are adjustable in accordance with market situations when the Company borrowed funds with similar terms and remaining maturities.

The Company’s credit rating provides it with readily and adequate access to funds in global markets. As of September 30, 2014, the Company had certain lines of credit that are collateralized by restricted deposits.

Entity with
Facility
Type of
Facility
Interest
Rate

Expiration
Date

Credit
Limitation

Unused
Credit

Trio-Tech International Pte. Ltd., Singapore

Lines of Credit
With interest rates ranging from 1.88% to 8.06% -- $ 8,905 $ 5,857

The Company’s credit rating provides it with readily and adequate access to funds in global markets. As of June 30, 2014, the Company had certain lines of credit that are collateralized by restricted deposits.

Entity with
Facility
Type of
Facility
Interest
Rate

Expiration
Date

Credit
Limitation

Unused
Credit
Trio-Tech International Pte. Ltd., Singapore

Lines of Credit
With interest rates ranging from 1.77% to 6.04% -- $ 9,073 $ 5,306

~~17. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES~~

Trio-Tech (Malaysia) Sdn. Bhd. has expansion plans to meet the growing demands of a major customer in Malaysia, as the existing facility is inadequate to meet the demands of that customer. The Company has capital commitments for the purchase of equipment and other related infrastructure costs amounting to RM 128, or approximately $39 based on the exchange rate as on September 30, 2014 published by the Monetary Authority of Singapore, in the Malaysia operations.

Trio-Tech (Tianjin) Co. Ltd. in China has capital commitments for the purchase of equipment and other related infrastructure costs amounting to RMB 259, or approximately $42, based on the exchange rate as on September 30, 2014 published by the Monetary Authority of Singapore.

Trio-Tech International Pte. Ltd. in Singapore has capital commitments for the purchase of equipment and other related infrastructure costs amounting to SGD 100, or approximately $79, based on the exchange rate as on September 30, 2014 published by the Monetary Authority of Singapore.

18. ~~OTHER INCOME~~

~~Other income consisted of the following:~~

For the Quarter Ended
September 30,

2014 2013
Investment income deemed interest income

$
51

49

Interest income

3

3

Other rental income

26

51

Exchange (loss) / gain

(10
)

38

Usage of inventory previously provided for obsolescence

-

17

Allowance for doubtful deemed interest receivables

(51
)

-

Other miscellaneous income

27

6

Total

$
46

$
164

~~Other income included $51 and $49 from investment income which was deemed to be interest income since the investment was deemed and classified as a loan based on ASC Topic 310-10-25~~ ~~Receivables,~~ ~~for the first quarter of fiscal year 2015 and fiscal year 2014, respectively.~~

~~-19-~~

~~Table of Contents~~

~~19. DISCONTINUED OPERATION AND CORRESPONDING RESTRUCTURING PLAN~~

The Company’s Indonesia operation and the Indonesia operation’s immediate holding company, which comprise the fabrication services segment, suffered continued operating losses in the past four fiscal years, and the cash flow was minimal for the past four years. The Company established a restructuring plan to close the fabrication services operation, and in accordance with ASC Topic 205-20, ~~Presentation of Financial Statement Discontinued Operations (“ASC Topic 250-20”)~~, the Company presented the operation results from fabrication services as a discontinued operation, as the Company believed that no continued cash flow would be generated by the discontinued component and that the Company would have no significant continuing involvement in the operations of the discontinued component. In accordance with the restructuring plan, the Company is negotiating with its suppliers to settle the outstanding balance of accounts payable of $53 and there is no accounts receivable since all the amounts due have been collected.~~The Company’s fabrication operation in Indonesia is in the process of commencing winding down the operations.~~

The discontinued operations in Shanghai and in Indonesia, did not incur general and administrative expenses for the quarter ended September 30, 2014, and incurred general and administrative expenses and selling expenses of $4 for the same period in the last fiscal year. The Company anticipates that it may incur additional costs and expenses at the time of winding down the business of the subsidiary through which the facilities operated.

~~Loss from discontinued operations for the quarter ended September 30, 2014 and 2013 was as follows:~~

For the Quarter Ended
September 30,

2014 2013
Revenue $ - $ -
Cost of sales - (3 )
Gross loss - (3 )
Operating expenses
General and administrative - (4 )
Selling - -
Impairment loss of property, plant and equipment - -
Total - (4 )
Loss from discontinued operation - (7 )
Other income / (charges) 26 (35 )
Net income / (loss) from discontinued operation 26 (42 )
Less: net income / (loss) attributable to the non-controlling interest 12 (19 )
Income/ (loss) from discontinued operation, net of tax $ 14 (23 )

~~The Company does not provide a separate cash flow statement for the discontinued operation, as the impact of this discontinued operation was immaterial.~~

~~20. ACCRUED EXPENSES~~

~~Accrued expenses consisted of the following~~:

For the Quarter Ended
September 30,

2014 2013
Payroll and related costs $ 1,166 $ 1,096
Commissions 32 47
Customer deposits 84 79
Legal and audit 205 177
Sales tax 109 120
Utilities 146 156
Warranty 55 60
Accrued purchase of materials and fixed assets 396 358
Provision for re-instatement 408 367
Other accrued expenses 135 602
Currency translation effect (51 ) (16 )
Total $ 2,685 $ 3,046

~~-20-~~

~~Table of Contents~~

~~21. OTHER ASSETS~~

~~Other assets consisted of the following~~:

For the Quarter Ended
September 30,

2014 2013
Down-payment for purchase of fixed assets $ 1,150 $ 1,103
Deposits for rental and utilities 150 158
Others 6 2
Total $ 1,306 $ 1,263

~~22. SUBSEQUENT EVENT~~

~~Subsequent to September 30,~~On October 14, 2014, TTCQ and Jun Zhou Zhi Ye entered into a memorandum of ~~understanding on October 14, 2014.~~understanding. Based on the memorandum of understanding, both parties have agreed to register a sales and purchase agreement upon Jun Zhou Zhi Ye obtaining the license to sell the properties of the commercial property (the Singapore Themed Resort Project), located in Chongqing China. The proposed agreement is for the sale of shop lots with a total area of 1,484.55 square meters as consideration for all the outstanding amounts owed to TTCQ by Jun Zhou Zhi Ye, with the exception of RMB 2,000, or approximately $326, which will be paid in cash, as follows:

a)	Long term loan receivable RMB 5,000, or approximately $814, as disclosed in Note 10, plus the unrecognized interest receivable on long term loan receivable of RMB 1,250;

b)	Commercial units measuring 668 square meters, as ~~disclosed in Note 11;~~mentioned above; and

c)	RMB 5,900 for the part of the unrecognized cash consideration of RMB 8,000 relating to the disposal of the joint ~~venture, as disclosed in Note 11.~~venture.

The shop lots are to be delivered to TTCQ upon completion of the construction of the shop lots in the Singapore Themed Resort Project, which is expected to be no later than December 31, 2016.

18. LINES OF CREDIT

The Company’s credit rating provides it with readily and adequate access to funds in global markets. As of December 31, 2014, the Company had certain lines of credit that are collateralized by restricted deposits.

Entity with

Type of

Interest

Expiration

Credit

Unused

Facility

Rate

Date

Limitation

Credit

Trio-Tech International Pte. Ltd., Singapore

Lines of Credit

Ranging from 1.88% to 8.06%

8,135

5,618

Trio-Tech (Malaysia) Sdn. Bhd

Lines of Credit

Ranging from 4.6% to 5.1%

429

257

Entity with

Type of

Interest

Expiration

Credit

Unused

Facility

Rate

Date

Limitation

Credit

Trio-Tech International Pte. Ltd., Singapore

Lines of Credit

Ranging from 1.77% to 6.04%

9,073

5,306

~~-21-~~-24-

19. ACCRUED EXPENSES

~~Table~~Accrued expenses consisted of ~~Contents~~the following:

	December 31, 2014			June 30, 2014
	(Unaudited)
Payroll and related costs	$	1,104		$	1,096
Commissions		65			47
Customer deposits		75			79
Legal and audit		185			177
Sales tax		120			120
Utilities		130			156
Warranty		51			60
Accrued purchase of materials and fixed assets		614			358
Provision for re-instatement of leasehold properties		367			367
Other accrued expenses		346			602
Currency translation effect		(65	)		(16	)
Total	$	2,992		$	3,046

20. OTHER ASSETS

Other assets consisted of the following:

	Dec. 31, 2014		June 30, 2014
	(Unaudited)
Down payment for property, plant and equipment	$	1,847	$	1,103
Deposit for rental and utilities		150		158
Others		-		2
Ending balance	$	1,997	$	1,263

21. OTHER INCOME / (EXPENSES)

Other income / (expenses) consisted of the following:

	Six Months Ended						Three Months Ended
	Dec. 31,			Dec. 31,			Dec. 31,			Dec. 31,
	2014			2013			2014			2013
	Unaudited			Unaudited			Unaudited			Unaudited

Investment income deemed interest income	$	68		$	102		$	16		$	51
Allowance for doubtful loan receivables		(68	)		(338	)		(16	)		(338	)
Interest income		6			2			4			1
Other rental income		52			165			26			60
Exchange gain / (loss)		(70	)		32			(59	)		(6	)
Other miscellaneous (expense) / income		66			(4	)		36			27
Total	$	54		$	(41	)	$	7		$	(205	)

Other income included investment income which was deemed to be interest income since the investment was deemed and classified as a loan receivables based on ASC Topic 310-10-25 Receivables amounted to $16 and $68 for the three and six months ending December 31, 2014, respectively, as compared to $51 and $102 for the same periods in the last fiscal year. Other income for both the three and six months ending December 31, 2014 included $16 and $68 allowance for doubtful loan and doubtful interest receivables, respectively, as compared to $338 for each of the same periods in the last fiscal year.

-25-

TRIO-TECH INTERNATIONAL AND SUBSIDIARIES

ITEM 2. M A~~NAGEMENT’S~~ MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS)

Overview

The following should be read in conjunction with the condensed consolidated unaudited financial statements and notes in Item I above and with the audited consolidated financial statements and notes, and the information under the headings “Risk Factors” and “Management’s ~~discussion~~Discussion and ~~analysis~~Analysis of ~~financial condition~~Financial Condition and ~~results~~Results of ~~operations”~~Operations” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2014.

Trio-Tech International (“TTI”) was incorporated in 1958 under the laws of the State of California. As used herein, the term “Trio-Tech” or “Company” or “we” or “us” or “Registrant” includes Trio-Tech International and its subsidiaries unless the context otherwise indicates. Our mailing address and executive offices are located at 16139 Wyandotte Street, Van Nuys, California 91406, and our telephone number is (818) 787-7000.

The Company is a provider of reliability test equipment and services to the semiconductor industry. Our customers rely on us to verify that their semiconductor components meet or exceed the rigorous reliability standards demanded for aerospace, communications and other electronics products.

TTI generated ~~approximately 99.5%~~more than 99% of its revenue from its three core business segments in the test and measurement industry, i.e. manufacturing of test equipment, testing services and distribution of test equipment during the ~~three~~six months ended ~~September 30,~~December 31, 2014. To reduce our risks associated with sole industry focus and customer concentration, the Company expanded its business into real estate ~~businesses~~investment and the oil and gas equipment fabrication business in ~~2007.~~2007 and 2009, respectively. However, in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2013, the Company decided to discontinue its oil and gas equipment fabrication business, which segment is considered a discontinued operation.

Manufacturing

TTI develops and manufactures an extensive range of test equipment used in the "front end" and the "back end" manufacturing processes of semiconductors. Our equipment includes leak detectors, autoclaves, centrifuges, burn-in systems and boards, HAST testers, temperature controlled chucks, wet benches and more.

Testing

TTI provides comprehensive electrical, environmental, and burn-in testing services to semiconductor manufacturers in our testing laboratories in Southeast Asia and the United States. Our customers include both manufacturers and end-users of semiconductor and electronic components, who look to us when they do not want to establish their own facilities. The independent tests are performed to industry and customer specific standards.

Distribution

In addition to our own ~~proprietary~~ products and services, TTI also provides an extensive range of complementary environmental and reliability test equipment from reputable manufacturers through our distribution operations. Such equipment includes temperature cycling and shock test chambers, reflow ovens, interface systems, vibration systems, mechanical shock testers, drop testers and more. Besides equipment, we also distribute a wide range of components such as connectors, sockets and touch-screen panels.

Real Estate

Beginning in 2007, TTI has invested in real property in Chongqing, China, which has generated investment income from the rental revenue from real estate we purchased in Chongqing, China, and investment returns from ~~the~~ deemed loan receivables, which are classified as other income. The rental income is generated from the rental properties in MaoYe, JiangHuai and FuLi in Chongqing, China. The investment, which is deemed a loan receivable, generates investment returns from the ~~two~~ investments ~~amounting to RMB 7 million~~ in JiaSheng and JiangHuai.

~~-22-~~-26-

~~Table of Contents~~

~~SUBSEQUENT EVENT~~

Subsequent to September 30, 2014, TTCQ and Jun Zhou Zhi Ye entered into a memorandum of understanding on October 14, 2014. Based on the memorandum of understanding, both parties have agreed to register a sales and purchase agreement upon Jun Zhou Zhi Ye obtaining the license to sell the properties of the commercial property (the Singapore Themed Resort Project), located in Chongqing China. The proposed agreement is for the sale of shop lots with a total area of 1,484.55 square meters as consideration for all the outstanding amounts owed to TTCQ by Jun Zhou Zhi Ye, with the exception of RMB 2,000 or approximately $326, which will be paid in cash, as follows:

a)	~~Long term loan receivable RMB 5,000, or approximately $814, as disclosed in Note 10, plus the unrecognized interest receivable on long term loan receivable of RMB 1,250;~~

b)	~~Commercial units measuring 668 square meters, as disclosed in Note 11; and~~

c)	~~RMB 5,900 for the part of the unrecognized cash consideration of RMB 8,000 relating to the disposal of joint venture, as disclosed in Note 11.~~

~~The shop lots are to be delivered to TTCQ upon completion of the construction of the shop lots in the Singapore Themed Resort Project, which is expected to be no later than December 31, 2016.~~

~~First~~Second Quarter Fiscal ~~Year~~ 2015 Highlights

·	~~Total revenue decreased by $1,404, or 14.8%, to $8,093 in the first quarter of fiscal year 2015, compared to $9,497 for the same period in fiscal year 2014.~~

·	Manufacturing segment revenue decreased by ~~$1,154,~~$1,020, or ~~27.5%~~23.4%, to ~~$3,047~~$3,348 for the ~~first~~second quarter of fiscal ~~year~~ 2015, compared to ~~$4,201~~$4,368 for the same period in fiscal ~~year~~ 2014.

·	Testing segment revenue increased by ~~$570,~~$476, or ~~14.1%~~10.4%, to ~~$4,618~~$5,073 for the ~~first~~second quarter of fiscal ~~year~~ 2015, compared to ~~$4,048~~$4,597 for the same period in fiscal ~~year~~ 2014.

·	Distribution segment revenue ~~decreased~~increased by ~~$819,~~$104, or ~~68.0%~~31.7%, to ~~$385~~$432 for the ~~first~~second quarter of fiscal ~~year~~ 2015, compared to ~~$1,204~~$328 for the same period in fiscal ~~year~~ 2014.

·	Real estate segment revenue decreased by ~~$1,~~$2, or ~~2.3%~~4.3%, to ~~$43~~$44 for the ~~first~~second quarter of fiscal ~~year~~ 2015, compared to ~~$44~~$46 for the same period in fiscal ~~year~~ 2014.

·	The overall gross profit margins increased by ~~0.2%~~6.2% to ~~22.2%~~27.5% for the ~~first~~second quarter of fiscal ~~year~~ 2015, from ~~22.0%~~21.3% for the same period in fiscal ~~year~~ 2014.

·	~~Loss~~Income from operations ~~increased by $121 to $134~~ for the ~~first~~second quarter of fiscal ~~year~~ 2015 was $437, compared to ~~$13~~an operating loss of $106 for the same period in fiscal ~~year~~ 2014.

·	General and administrative expenses as a percentage of revenue decreased by ~~$96, or 5.2%,~~0.5% to ~~$1,738~~19.2% for the ~~first~~second quarter of fiscal ~~year~~ 2015, from ~~$1,834~~19.7% for the same period in fiscal ~~year 2014.~~

·	~~Stock option expenses decreased by $105 to $9 for the first quarter of fiscal year 2015, compared to $114 for the same period in fiscal year~~ 2014.

·	Selling expenses as a percentage of revenue decreased by ~~$74, or 36.1%,~~0.3% to ~~$131~~1.9% for the ~~first~~second quarter of fiscal ~~year~~ 2015, from ~~$205~~2.2% for the same period in fiscal ~~year~~ 2014.

~~During~~Net income attributable to Trio-Tech International for the ~~first~~second quarter of ~~fiscal year~~ 2015 ~~loss from continuing operations before non-controlling interest, net of tax~~ was ~~$106,~~$94 as compared to ~~an income~~a net loss of ~~$126~~$365 for the same period in fiscal ~~year~~ 2014.

·	~~During the first quarter of fiscal year 2015, income from discontinuing operations net of tax was $26, as compared to a loss of $42 for the same period in fiscal year 2014.~~

·	~~Loss per share for the first quarter of fiscal year 2015 was $0.04, as compared to a loss per share of $0.01 for the same period in last fiscal year.~~

·	~~Total Assets decreased by $1,255, or 3.6%, to $33,335 as of September 30, 2014 compared to $34,590 as of June 30, 2014.~~

·	~~Total Liabilities decreased by $1,344, or 9.8%, to $12,413 as of September 30, 2014 compared to $13,757 as of June 30, 2014.~~

~~-23-~~

~~Table of Contents~~

Results of Operations and Business Outlook

The following table sets forth our revenue components for the three and six months ended ~~September 30,~~December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively.

Revenue Components	Three Months Ended September 30,					Three Months Ended December 31,				Six Months Ended December 31,
		2014		2013		2014		2013			2014		2013
Revenue:
Manufacturing		37.6	%	44.2	%	37.6	%	46.8	%		37.6	%	45.5	%
Testing Services		57.1		42.6		57.0		49.2			57.0		45.9
Distribution		4.8		12.7		4.9		3.5			4.9		8.1
Real Estate		0.5		0.5		0.5		0.5			0.5		0.5

Total		100.0	%	100.0	%	100.0	%	100.0	%		100.0	%	100.0	%

Revenue for the three months and six months ended ~~September 30,~~December 31, 2014 was ~~$8,093, down from $9,497,~~$8,897 and $16,990, respectively, a decrease of ~~$1,404~~$442 and $1,846, respectively, when compared to the revenue for the same ~~period~~periods of the prior fiscal year. As a percentage, revenue decreased by ~~14.8%~~4.7% and 9.8% for the three and six months ended ~~September 30,~~December 31, 2014, respectively, when compared to total revenue for the same ~~period~~periods of the prior year.

For the three months ended ~~September 30,~~December 31, 2014, the overall decrease in revenue was primarily due to a decrease in ~~revenue in~~ the manufacturing segment in our Singapore operations and U.S. operations, a decrease in the distribution segment ~~which was~~in the Singapore operations and a decrease in the real estate segment in China. These decreases were partially offset by an increase in ~~revenue from~~ the testing ~~segment. In~~segment in all testing operations except the operations in Suzhou, China.

For the six months ended December 31, 2014, the decrease in overall revenue was primarily due to a decrease in the manufacturing segment ~~revenue decreased in our U.S. and Singapore operations. Our testing segment revenue decreased~~ in our Singapore operations ~~in our Malaysia~~and U.S. operations, and a decrease in ~~our Suzhou operations~~the real estate segment in ~~China, which was~~China. These decreases were partially offset by an increase ~~from our Tianjin~~in the distribution segment in the Singapore operations and an increase in the testing segment in all testing operations except operations in ~~China~~Singapore and the operations in ~~our Thailand operations.~~Suzhou, China.

-27-

~~Total revenue~~Revenue into and within China, the Southeast Asia regions and other countries (except revenue into and within the United States) decreased by ~~$1,254, or 13.6%,~~$443 (or 4.9%) to ~~$7,964~~$8,570, and by $1,696 (or 9.3%) to $16,534 for the three months and six months ended ~~September 30,~~December 31, 2014, respectively, as compared with ~~$9,218~~$9,013 and $18,230, respectively, for the same ~~period~~periods of last fiscal year. The decrease was mainly due to a decrease in manufacturing and distribution segments in our Singapore operations and testing and distribution segments in our Suzhou operations in China, which was partially offset by an increase in the testing segment in our Tianjin operations in China and in our Thailand operations.

~~Total revenue~~Revenue into and within the United States was ~~$129~~$327 and $456 for the three months and six months ended ~~September 30,~~December 31, 2014, respectively, an increase of $1 and a decrease of $150, respectively, from ~~$279~~$326 and $606 for the same ~~period~~periods of ~~the prior year.~~last fiscal year, respectively. The decrease in the ~~three~~six months result was mainly due to ~~a postponement of the shipment of~~fewer orders ~~at the request of a customer and a decrease in orders in our manufacturing segment from our customers in the U.S. market~~received in the first quarter of fiscal ~~year~~2015 and the delay in delivering certain orders to our customers during the second quarter of fiscal 2015, as compared to the same period in the last fiscal ~~year 2014.~~year.

Revenue ~~within our four current segments~~ for the three and six months ended ~~September 30,~~December 31, 2014 iscan be discussed ~~below. Because~~within the ~~fabrication segment was considered~~four segments as ~~discontinued operations in the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2013, there is no discussion below regarding such prior segment.~~follows:

Manufacturing Segment

Revenue in the manufacturing segment as a percentage of total revenue was 37.6% for both the three and six months ended ~~September 30,~~December 31, 2014, a decrease of ~~6.6%~~9.2% and a decrease of 7.9% of total revenue, respectively, when compared to ~~44.2% in~~ the same ~~period~~periods of the last fiscal year. The absolute amount of revenue decreased by ~~$1,154~~$1,020 to ~~$3,047~~$3,348 from $4,368 and decreased by $2,174 to $6,395 from $8,569 for the three and six months ended ~~September 30,~~December 31, 2014, respectively, compared to ~~$4,201 for~~ the same ~~period~~periods of the last fiscal year.

Revenue in the manufacturing segment for the three ~~months~~and six month periods ended ~~September 30,~~December 31, 2014 decreased ~~primarily due to postponement of order deliveries as requested by a customers~~ in the Singapore operations and ~~a customer~~ in the ~~U.S. operations and also~~U.S operations. The decreases were mainly due to ~~decrease~~a reduction in capital spending by one of our ~~other~~major customers ~~for equipment used for their facilities~~as compared to the same period of last fiscal year. The revenue in the manufacturing segment from this major customer accounted for ~~70.7%~~68.2% and ~~52.3%~~62.2% of our total revenue in the manufacturing segment for the three months ended ~~September 30,~~December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively, and 69.4% and 57.3% of our total revenue in the manufacturing segment for the six months ended December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively. The year-end shut-down of their facilities and receiving of goods by our customers caused the delay in delivering equipments.

The future revenue in our manufacturing segment will be significantly affected by the purchase and capital expenditure plans of this major customer, if the customer base cannot be increased.

~~-24-~~

~~Table of Contents~~

Testing Services Segment

Revenue in the testing segment as a percentage of total revenue was ~~57.1%~~57.0% for both the three and six months ended ~~September 30,~~December 31, 2014, an increase of ~~14.5%~~7.8% and an increase of 11.1%, respectively, of total revenue when compared to ~~42.6% for~~ the same ~~period~~periods of the last fiscal year. The absolute amount of revenue increased by ~~$570~~$476 to ~~$4,618~~$5,073 from $4,597 and by $1,046 to $9,691 from $8,645 for the three and six months ended ~~September 30,~~December 31, 2014, asrespectively, compared to ~~$4,048 for~~ the same ~~period~~periods of the last fiscal year.

Revenue in the testing segment for the three ~~months~~month period ended ~~September 30,~~December 31, 2014 increased primarily due to an increase in testing volume in all our ~~Tianjin, China~~testing operations ~~and our Thailand~~except the Suzhou operations ~~but was partially offset by a decrease~~ in ~~testing volume in our Singapore and Suzhou, China operations. Though our Malaysia operations had an~~China. The increase in testing volume ~~the increase was from lower priced products, resulting in the decrease in absolute dollar sales. The decrease in testing volume in our Singapore operations~~ was mainly caused by an increase in orders from our major customers due to the increase in demand for our customers’ ~~reducing their orders~~products. The decrease in our testing volume in the Suzhou operation in China was due to the decrease in orders from our customers due to lower demand for their ~~products.~~

products produced in China.

Demand for testing services varies from country to country depending on changes taking place in the market and our customers’ forecasts. As it is difficult to accurately forecast fluctuations in the market, management believes it is necessary to maintain testing facilities in close proximity to our customers in order to make it convenient for them to send us their newly manufactured parts for testing and to enable us to maintain a share of the market.

-28-

Distribution Segment

Revenue in the distribution segment ~~accounted for 4.8%~~as a percentage of total revenue was 4.9% for both the three and six months ended ~~September 30,~~December 31, 2014, an increase of 1.4% and a decrease of ~~7.9%~~3.2%, respectively, when compared to ~~12.7% for~~ the same ~~period~~periods of the ~~last~~prior fiscal year. The absolute amount of revenue increased by $104 to $432 from $328, and decreased by ~~$819~~$715 to ~~$385~~$817 from $1,532 for the three and six months ended ~~September 30,~~December 31, 2014, respectively, compared to ~~$1,204 for~~ the same ~~period~~periods of the last fiscal year.

Revenue in the distribution segment for the three ~~months~~month period ended ~~September 30,~~December 31, 2014 ~~decreased~~increased primarily due to ~~a request from a customer~~an increase in demand for the products. Revenue in the distribution segment for the six month period ended December 31, 2014 decreased even though the revenue in this segment increased in the second quarter of fiscal 2015, mainly due to ~~delay the delivery of equipment and by~~ the decrease in ~~orders from our customers as~~ the ~~demand for their products decreased.~~revenue in the first quarter of this fiscal year.

Demand ~~for~~in the distribution segment varies depending on the demand for our customers’ products and the changes taking place in the market and our customers’ forecasts. Hence it is difficult to accurately forecast fluctuations in the market.

Real Estate Segment

The real estate segment accounted for 0.5% of total net revenue for both the three months and six months ended ~~September 30, 2014, and for the same period of the last fiscal year.~~December 31, 2014. The absolute amount of revenue in the real estate segment decreased by $1$2 to ~~$43~~$44 from $46 and by $3 to $87 from $90 for the three and six months ended ~~September 30,~~December 31, 2014, respectively, compared to ~~$44 for~~ the same ~~period~~periods of the last fiscal year. The decrease was primarily due to a decrease in ~~revenue~~rental income in the real estate segment for the three and six months ended ~~September 30,~~December 31, 2014 ~~was mainly due to foreign exchange fluctuation.~~

~~The revenue in the real estate segment is~~as described below.

The two main revenue components for the real estate segment were investment income and rental income.

Rental income for the three and six months ended December 31, 2014 was $44 and $87, respectively, as compared to $46 and $90, respectively, for the same periods of the last fiscal year. The decrease of $2 and $3, respectively, was primarily due to the fact that units in JiangHuai did not generate any rental income during the three and six months ended December 31, 2014, as compared to $4 and $9 for the same period in the last fiscal year. These decreases were offset by the increase in rental income from MaoYe and FuLi as compared to the same periods in the prior fiscal year. TTCQ is actively looking for suitable tenants for renting all the commercial units.

TTCQ has yet to receive the title deed for properties purchased from JiangHuai. TTCQ is in the legal process to obtain the title deed, which is dependent on JiangHuai completing the entire project.

No investment income was recorded as “revenue” for the three months ended ~~September 30,~~December 31, 2014 and 2013. Income of $16 and $68 for the three and six months ended December 31, 2014, respectively, as compared to $51 and ~~$49~~$102 for ~~each~~the same periods of the ~~three months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013 respectively, was generated~~last fiscal year, from certain of our property development investments ~~which were~~was reclassified to loan ~~receivables commencing~~receivables. Such income is included in “Other Income” with effect from the third quarter of fiscal 2011 in accordance with ASC Topic 310-10-25 Receivables. ~~Such income is included in “Other Income.”~~

Rental income for the three months ended September 30, 2014 was $43, as compared to $44 for the same period of the last fiscal year. The decrease of $1 was primarily due to foreign exchange fluctuation.

“Investment” as shown in the balance sheet ~~consisted~~consists of the cost of an investment in a joint venture in which we have a 10% interest. During the second quarter of fiscal year 2014, TTCQ disposed of its 10% interest in the joint venture. The joint venture had to raise funds for the development of the project. As a joint-venture partner, TTCQ was required to stand guarantee for the funds to be borrowed; considering the amount of borrowing, the risk involved was higher than the investment made and hence TTCQ decided to dispose of the 10% interest in the joint venture investment. On October 2, 2013, TTCQ entered into a share transfer agreement with Zhu Shu. Based on the agreement the purchase price was to be paid by (1) RMB 10,000 worth of commercial property in Chongqing China, or approximately $1,634 based on exchange rates published by the Monetary Authority of Singapore as of October 2, 2013, by non-monetary consideration and (2) the remaining RMB 8,000, or approximately $1,307 based on exchange rates published by the Monetary Authority of Singapore as of October 2, 2013, by cash consideration. The consideration consists of (1) commercial units measuring 668 square meters to be delivered in June 2016 and (2) sixteen quarterly equal installments of RMB 500 per quarter commencing from January 2014. Based on ASC Topic

-29-

845 Non-monetary Consideration, the Company deferred the recognition of the gain on disposal of the 10% interest in joint venture investment until such time that the consideration is paid, so that the gain can be ascertained. The recorded value of the disposed investment amounting to $783, based on exchange rates published by the Monetary Authority of Singapore as of June 30, 2014, is classified as “other assets” under non-current assets, because it is considered a down payment for the purchase of the commercial property in Chongqing. The first installment amount of RMB 500 was due in January 2014 and was outstanding as at March 31, 2014. The second and third installment ~~amount~~amounts of RMB 500 ~~was~~each were due in April 2014 and July 2014. ~~As at~~During May ~~14,~~ 2014, TTCQ had received RMB 100. ~~As at the date of this 10-Q report the remaining amounts are still outstanding.~~

~~-25-~~

~~Table of Contents~~

On October 14, 2014, TTCQ and Jun Zhou Zhi Ye entered into a memorandum of understanding. Based on the memorandum of understanding, both parties have agreed to register a sales and purchase agreement upon Jun Zhou Zhi Ye obtaining the license to sell the properties of the commercial property (the Singapore Themed Resort Project) located in Chongqing China. The proposed agreement is for the sale of shop lots with a total area of 1,484.55 square meters as consideration for all the outstanding amounts owed to TTCQ by Jun Zhou Zhi Ye, with the exception of RMB 2,000, or approximately $326, which will be paid in cash, as follows:

a)	Long term loan receivable RMB 5,000, or approximately $814, as disclosed in Note 10, plus the unrecognized interest receivable on long term loan receivable of RMB 1,250;

b)	Commercial units measuring 668 square meters, as mentioned above; and

c)	RMB 5,900 for the part of the unrecognized cash consideration of RMB 8,000 relating to the disposal of the joint venture.

The shop lots are to be delivered to TTCQ upon completion of the construction of the shop lots in the Singapore Themed Resort Project, which is expected to be no later than December 31, 2016.

Uncertainties and Remedies

There are several influencing factors which create uncertainties when forecasting performance, such as the ever-changing nature of technology, specific requirements from the customer, and decline in demand for certain types of burn-in devices or equipment, decline in demand for testing services and fabrication services, and other similar factors. One factor that influences uncertainty is the highly competitive nature of the semiconductor industry. Another is that some customers are unable to provide a forecast of the products required in the upcoming weeks; hence it is difficult to plan for the resources needed to meet these customers’ requirements due to short lead time and last minute order confirmation. This will normally result in a lower margin for these products, as it is more expensive to purchase materials in a short time frame. However, the Company has taken certain actions and formulated certain plans to deal with and to help mitigate these unpredictable factors. For example, in order to meet manufacturing customers’ demands upon short notice, the Company maintains higher inventories, but continues to work closely with its customers to avoid stock piling. We have also been improving customer service from staff by keeping our staff up to date on the newest technology and stressing the importance of understanding and meeting the stringent requirements of our customers. Finally, the Company is exploring new markets and products, looking for new customers, and upgrading and improving burn-in technology while at the same time searching for improved testing methods of higher technology chips.

There are several influencing factors which create uncertainties when forecasting performance of our real estate segment, such as obtaining the rights by the joint venture to develop the real estate projects in China, inflation in China, currency fluctuations and devaluation, and changes in Chinese laws, regulations, or their interpretation.

-30-

Comparison of the ~~First~~Second Quarter Ended ~~September 30,~~December 31, 2014 (“Q2 2015”) and ~~September 30,~~December 31, 2013 (“Q2 2014”)

The following table sets forth certain consolidated statements of income data as a percentage of revenue for the ~~first quarter~~second quarters of fiscal ~~years~~ 2015 and 2014, respectively:

	Three Months Ended September 30,						Three Months Ended December 31,
	2014			2013			2014			2013
Revenue		100.0	%		100.0	%		100.0	%		100.0	%
Cost of sales		77.8			78.0			72.5			78.7
Gross Margin		22.2	%		22.0	%		27.5	%		21.3	%
Operating expenses
General and administrative		21.5	%		19.3	%		19.2	%		19.7	%
Selling		1.6			2.2			1.9			2.2
Research and development		0.6			0.5			0.5			0.5
Impairment loss of property, plant and equipment		0.2			0.0
Gain on disposal of property, plant and equipment		0.0			0.1
Impairment loss								0.6			0.0
Loss on disposal of property, plant and equipment								0.3			0.0
Total operating expenses		23.9	%		22.1	%		22.5	%		22.4	%
Loss from Operations		(1.7	)%		(0.1	)%
Income / (Loss) from Operations								5.0	%		(1.1	)%

Overall Gross Margin

Overall gross margin as a percentage of revenue increased by ~~0.2%~~6.2% to ~~22.2%~~27.5% for the three months ended ~~September 30,~~December 31, 2014, from ~~22.0%~~21.3% for the same period of the last fiscal year, primarily due to an increase in the gross profit margin in the manufacturing, testing ~~segment.~~and distribution segments. The increase was partially offset by a decrease in gross profit margin in the ~~manufacturing, distribution and~~ real estate ~~segments.~~segment. In terms of absolute dollar amounts, gross profits increased by $456 to $2,443 for the three months ended December 31, 2014, from $1,987 as compared to the same period of the last fiscal year.

Gross profit margin as a percentage of revenue in the manufacturing segment ~~decreased~~increased by ~~13.2%~~5.3% to ~~5.7%~~18.6% for the three months ended ~~September 30,~~December 31, 2014, from ~~18.9%~~13.3% in the same period of the last fiscal year. The ~~decrease~~increase in gross margin was due to the change in product mix, as this segment increased sales of ~~gross~~products that had higher profit margin ~~was primarily due~~items sufficient to ~~a decrease in revenue. The decrease in revenue was lower than the decrease in cost, resulting in~~offset the decrease in gross ~~margin. The decrease~~margin due to the change in ~~revenue was $1,154, which was $621 higher than~~product mix in the ~~decrease in cost of $533~~manufacturing segment as compared ~~with~~to the same period inof last fiscal year. ~~The decrease in revenue in our Singapore operation was primarily due to the decrease in orders from one major customer, as discussed above.~~ In absolute dollar amounts, gross profits in the manufacturing segment ~~decreased~~increased by ~~$621~~$42 to ~~$174~~$622 for the three months ended ~~September 30,~~December 31, 2014 from ~~$795~~$580 for the same period of ~~the~~ last fiscal year.

Gross profit margin as a percentage of revenue in the testing segment increased by ~~8.7%~~4.6% to ~~34.0%~~33.8% for the three months ended ~~September 30,~~December 31, 2014, from ~~25.3%~~29.2% in the same period of the last fiscal year. The increase was primarily due to an increase in testing volume in our Malaysia operations, Tianjin, China operations, Singapore operations and Thailand operations, which was partially offset by the decrease in ~~China and in our Thailand operations. Though the~~testing volume in our ~~Malaysia operations increased, it was in a lower margin product, which resulted in a decrease in revenue.~~Suzhou, China operations. Significant portions of our cost of goods sold are fixed in the testing segment. Thus, as the demand of services and factory utilization ~~decrease,~~increase, the fixed costs are spread over the increased output, which increases the gross profit margin. The Tianjin, China operations and the Malaysia operations increased their space utilization, which was partially offset by the decrease in space utilization in the Singapore and Thailand operations. In absolute dollar amounts, gross profit in the testing segment increased by ~~$546~~$373 to ~~$1,569~~$1,717 for the three months ended ~~September 30,~~December 31, 2014 from ~~$1,023~~$1,344 for the same period of the last fiscal year.

~~-26-~~

~~Table of Contents~~

The gross profit margin of the distribution segment is not only affected by the market price of ~~the~~our products, ~~we distribute,~~ but also ~~the~~our product mix, ~~of products we distribute,~~ which changes frequently as a result of changes in market demand. Gross profit margin as a percentage of revenue in the distribution segment ~~decreased~~increased by ~~10.2%~~6.1% to ~~11.7%~~22.0% for the three months ended ~~September 30,~~December 31, 2014, from ~~21.9%~~15.9% in the same period of the last fiscal year. The ~~decrease~~increase in gross margin as a percentage of revenue was due to the change in product mix, as this segment ~~had less~~increased sales of products ~~with a~~that had higher profit margin items sufficient to offset the decrease in gross margin due to the change in product mix in the distribution segment as compared to the same period of last fiscal year. In terms of absolute dollar amounts, gross profit in the distribution segment for the three months ended ~~September 30,~~December 31, 2014 was ~~$45~~$95, an increase of $43 as compared to ~~$264~~$52 in the same period of ~~the~~ last fiscal year.

-31-

Gross profit margin as a percentage of revenue in the real estate segment was ~~20.9%~~20.5% for the three months ended ~~September 30, 2014, an increase~~December 31, 2013, a decrease of ~~0.4%~~3.4% as compared to ~~20.5%~~23.9% in the same period of the last fiscal year. In absolute dollar amounts, gross profit in the real estate segment ~~was $9~~ for the three months ended ~~September 30,~~December 31, 2014 ~~and 2013.~~was $9, a decrease of $2 from $11 in the same period of last fiscal year. The decrease in the gross profit margin as a percentage of revenue was due to a ~~lower~~decrease in rental revenue resulting from a time lag in renewal of rental agreements. The JiangHaui property remains vacant resulting in a decrease in rental income, which was offset by the increase in ~~revenue than~~rent due to contracts entered into in ~~cost.~~the fourth quarter of fiscal 2014 and also an increase in rental due from the renewal of rental agreements. The increase in rental revenue does not have a direct impact on the cost ~~was due to an increase~~associated with the properties, and thus may result in ~~travel expenses in~~a lower gross margin for the ~~first quarter of fiscal year 2015 as compared to the same period of the last fiscal year in the real estate segment.~~interim period.

Operating Expenses

Operating expenses for the ~~first quarter~~second quarters of fiscal ~~years~~ 2015 and 2014 were as follows:

	Three Months Ended September 30,				Three Months Ended December 31,
(Unaudited)	2014		2013		2014		2013
General and administrative	$	1,738	$	1,834	$	1,711	$	1,838
Selling		131		205		165		208
Research and development		47		52		47		49
Impairment loss of property, plant and equipment		15		-
Loss on disposal of property, plant and equipment		-		13
Impairment loss						55		-
Loss / (gain) on disposal of property, plant and equipment						28		(2	)
Total	$	1,931	$	2,104	$	2,006	$	2,093

General and administrative expenses decreased by ~~$96,~~$127, or ~~5.2%~~6.9%, from ~~$1,834~~$1,838 to ~~$1,738~~$1,711 for the three months ended ~~September 30,~~December 31, 2014 compared to the same period of last fiscal year. The decrease in the general and administrative expenses was mainly attributable to the decrease in ~~stock option expenses in Corporate amounting to $105. This was offset by an increase in expenses, such as salary and staff related~~the expenses in the Malaysia operations, U.S. operations, Thailand operations and Suzhou in China ~~testing operation, which~~operations. The decrease was ~~caused~~offset partially by the increase in general and administrative expenses in the Singapore operations, Tianjin, and Chongqing, China operations.

The decrease in expenses in the Malaysia operations was primarily due to the reversal of the provision for staff related expenses, which were no longer required as at December 31, 2014. The decrease in the corporate office was primarily due to a reduction in travelling expenses and professional fees. The decrease in the U.S. operations was mainly due to a decrease in payroll related expenses. The decrease in the Thailand operations was primarily due to a decrease in fees paid for professional services. These decreases were partially offset by the increase in general and administrative expenses in the Tianjin operations, Singapore operations, and Chongqing operations. The increase in the Singapore operations was primarily due to the higher reversal of provision for bonus and annual leave in the second quarter of fiscal year 2014 as compared to the reversal in the second quarter of fiscal year 2015. The increase in the Tianjin operations was primarily due to an increase in scale of operations. The increase in Chongqing operations was primarily due to an increase in legal fees. TTCQ has yet to receive the title deed for properties purchased from JiangHuai. TTCQ is in the legal process to obtain the title deed, which is dependent on JiangHuai completing the entire project.

Selling expenses decreased by ~~$74,~~$43, or ~~36.1%~~20.7%, for the three months ended ~~September 30,~~December 31, 2014, from ~~$205~~$208 to ~~$131~~$165 compared to the same period of the last fiscal year. The decrease was mainly due to a decrease in travel expenses and commission expenses as the commissionable revenue decreased in the ~~distribution and manufacturing segment of our~~ Singapore ~~operations as a result of a decrease in commissionable revenue.~~operations.

~~Loss~~Income / (Loss) from Operations

~~Loss~~Income from operations was ~~$134~~$437 for the three months ended ~~September 30,~~December 31, 2014, as compared to a loss from operations ~~of $13~~to $106 for the ~~three months ended September 30, 2013.~~same period of the last fiscal year. The ~~deterioration~~improvement was mainly due to the ~~decrease~~increase in ~~sales by $1,404~~gross margin and ~~partially offset by the~~a decrease in operating expenses, ~~by $173.~~as previously discussed.

-32-

Interest Expense

Interest expense for the ~~three months ended September 30,~~second quarters of fiscal 2015 and 2014 ~~and 2013 were~~was as follows:

	Three Months Ended September 30,				Three Months Ended December 31,
(Unaudited)	2014		2013		2014			2013
Interest expenses	$	64	$	68	$	(58	)	$	(66	)

Interest expense decreased by $4$8 to ~~$64~~$58 from $66 for the, three months ended ~~September 30,~~December 31, 2014, primarily due to ~~repayment~~payment of ~~the bank loan payables~~credit facilities and ~~the capital lease~~decreasing lines of credit utilized in the Singapore ~~and Malaysia operations.~~operation. We are trying to keep our debt at a minimum in order to save financing costs. As of ~~September 30,~~December 31, 2014, the Company had an unused line of credit of ~~$5,857.~~

~~-27-~~

~~Table of Contents~~

$5,875.

Income Tax ~~(Expenses)~~Benefit / ~~Benefit~~(Expenses)

Income tax ~~benefit~~expenses for the three months ended ~~September 30,~~December 31, 2014 ~~was $46~~were $132, as compared to income tax benefit of ~~$43~~$39 for the same ~~period in the~~quarter last fiscal year. The increase in income tax ~~benefit~~expense was mainly due to ~~the~~tax provision in our Tianjin, China operations and due to deferred tax for the timing difference recorded ~~by the Singapore operations, which was partially offset by the tax expenses in the China and Thailand operations~~ for the three months ended ~~September 30,~~December 31, 2014 as compared to the same period in the ~~last~~previous fiscal year.

~~Income / Loss from Discontinued Operations, net of~~ Tax expenses include $59, representing the tax

~~Income from discontinued operations, net of tax was $26~~ withheld by the China and Malaysia subsidiaries for the ~~three months ended September 30, 2014,~~payments made to the Singapore subsidiary that is not recoverable. The tax withheld by the China and ~~a loss~~Malaysia subsidiaries was paid to the inland revenue department of ~~$42 for~~ the ~~same period in last fiscal year.~~ respective countries.

Non-controlling Interest

As of ~~September 30,~~December 31, 2014, we held a 55% interest in Trio-Tech (Malaysia) Sdn. Bhd., Trio-Tech (Kuala Lumpur) Sdn. Bhd., SHI International Pte. Ltd., and ~~PT. SHI Indonesia. We also held~~PTSHI Indonesia, and a 76% interest in Prestal Enterprise Sdn. Bhd. The ~~share of net income from the subsidiaries by the~~ non-controlling interest for the three months ended ~~September 30,~~December 31, 2014, in the net income of subsidiaries, was ~~$56,~~$154, a ~~decrease~~change of ~~$45~~$157 compared to the ~~share~~non-controlling interest in the net loss of ~~net income of $101~~$3 for the same period of the previous fiscal year. The ~~decrease~~increase in the non-controlling interest in the net income of ~~the non-controlling interest in the~~ subsidiaries was attributable to the ~~decrease in~~higher net income generated by the Malaysia ~~testing~~operations.

Loss from Discontinued Operations

Loss from discontinued operations was $6 for the three months ended December 31, 2014 as compared to $30 for the same period of the last fiscal year. The other income in the discontinued operations was higher during the three months ended December 31, 2014, which was partially offset by the higher general and administrative expenses as compared to the same period in the ~~previous~~last fiscal year.

Net ~~Loss~~Income / (Loss)

Net ~~loss~~income was $94 for the three months ended ~~September 30,~~December 31, 2014, ~~was $136~~ as compared to ~~$17~~a net loss of $365 for the three months ended December 31, 2013. The change from net loss to net income was mainly due to an increase in gross margin and a decrease in operating expenses, as previously discussed. These decreases were partially offset by the increase in income tax expenses, as discussed above.

-33-

Earnings / (Loss) per Share

Basic and diluted earnings per share from continuing operations for the three months ended December 31, 2014 was $0.03 compared to basic and diluted loss per share of $0.10 in the same period of the last fiscal year.

~~Loss~~ The change in earnings per ~~Share~~share was due to an increase in net income, as discussed above.

Basic and diluted loss per share from ~~continuing~~the discontinued operations was ~~$0.04~~nil and $0.01 for the three months ended ~~September 30,~~December 31, 2014 ~~as compared to nil for the same period~~and 2013, respectively. Decrease in ~~the last fiscal year. Basic and diluted~~ loss per share ~~from~~in the discontinued operations was ~~nil~~mainly because the operations expenses were lower for the ~~three months ended September 30, 2014, as compared to a loss per share~~second quarter of ~~$0.01 for~~fiscal 2015, while there were higher expenses during the ~~same period in the last~~second quarter of fiscal ~~year.~~2014.

Segment Information

The revenue, gross margin and income from each segment for the ~~first~~second quarter ~~each~~ of fiscal ~~year~~ 2015 and the second quarter of fiscal ~~year~~ 2014, respectively, are presented below. As the revenue and gross margin for each segment have been discussed in the previous section, only the comparison of income from operations is discussed below.

Manufacturing Segment

The revenue, gross margin and loss from operations for the manufacturing segment for the ~~three months ended September 30,~~second quarter of fiscal 2015 and 2014 ~~and 2013~~ were as follows:

	Three Months Ended December 31,
(Unaudited)	2014				2013
Revenue		$	3,348			$	4,368
Gross margin			18.6	%			13.3	%
Loss from operations		$	(117	)		$	(201	)

Three Months Ended
September 30,

(Unaudited) 2014 2013
Revenue

$
3,047

$
4,201

Gross margin

5.7
%

18.9
%
Loss from operations

$
(618
)

$
(127
)

Loss from operations ~~from~~in the manufacturing segment ~~increased~~decreased by ~~$491~~$84 to ~~$618~~a loss of $117 for the three months ended ~~September 30,~~December 31, 2014 from ~~$127~~a loss of $201 in the same period of the last fiscal ~~year,~~year. The decrease was primarily due to an increase of $42 in the gross margin and a decrease of $42 in ~~revenue partially offset by a decrease in the cost of sales, resulting in a decrease in gross profit by $621,~~operating expenses as discussed earlier. Operating expenses for the manufacturing segment were ~~$792~~$739 and ~~$922~~$781 for the three months ended ~~September 30,~~December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively. The decrease in operating expenses of ~~$130 for the three months ended September 30, 2014~~$42 was mainly due to ~~lower commission~~a decrease in selling expenses of $49 and a decrease in allocation of corporate expenses, which was partially offset by the increase in general and administrative expenses by $33 as compared to the ~~commissionable sales decreased.~~

~~-28-~~

~~Table~~same period of ~~Contents~~last fiscal year

Testing Segment

The revenue, gross margin and ~~loss~~income from operations for the testing segment for the ~~three months ended September 30,~~second quarters of fiscal 2015 and 2014 ~~and 2013~~ were as follows:

	Three Months Ended September 30,								Three Months Ended December 31,
(Unaudited)	2014				2013				2014				2013
Revenue		$	4,618			$	4,048			$	5,073			$	4,597
Gross margin			34.0	%			25.3	%			33.8	%			29.2	%
Income from operations		$	576			$	102			$	687			$	289

Income from operations in the testing segment for the three months ended ~~September 30,~~December 31, 2014 was ~~$576,~~$687, an increase of ~~$474~~$398 compared to ~~$102~~$289 in the same period of ~~the~~ last fiscal year. The increase in operating income was mainly attributable to an increase ~~in revenue and an increase~~of $374 in gross margin, as discussed ~~earlier. Gross profit increased by $546~~earlier, and a decrease of $25 in operating ~~expenses increased by $72.~~expenses. Operating expenses were ~~$993~~$1,030 and ~~$921~~$1,055 for the three months ended ~~September 30,~~December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively. The ~~increase~~decrease in operating expenses was mainly attributable to a decrease of $135 in general and administrative expense, which was partially offset by an increase in ~~payroll related~~impairment expenses inby $55, loss on disposal of plant, property and equipment by $30, allocation of the ~~Singapore, Thailand~~corporate charges by $17, and ~~China operations. Tianjin, China operations expanded its capacity to meet the growing demand, which resulted in the increase in operating expenses.~~selling expenses by $8.

-34-

Distribution Segment

The revenue, gross margin and income from operations for the distribution segment for the ~~three months ended September 30,~~second quarters of fiscal 2015 and 2014 ~~and 2013~~ were as follows:

	Three Months Ended September 30,								Three Months Ended December 31,
(Unaudited)	2014				2013				2014				2013
Revenue		$	385			$	1,204			$	432			$	328
Gross margin			11.7	%			21.9	%			22.0	%			15.9	%
(Loss) / Income from operations		$	(36	)		$	192
Income from operations										$	36			$	7

~~Losses~~Income from operations ~~were~~in the distribution segment increased by $29 to $36 for the three months ended ~~September 30,~~December 31, 2014, as compared to ~~an income from operations of $192 for~~$7 in the same period of the last fiscal year. The change was caused mainly by the decrease in revenue and a decrease in absolute dollar gross profit, as discussed earlier. Gross profit decreased by $219, and the operating expenses increased by $9. Operating expenses were $81 and $72 for the three months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively. The increase in operating ~~expenses~~income was mainly due to an increase in ~~travelling~~gross profit by $43, which was partially offset by an increase in operating expenses ~~as compared~~by $14. Operating expenses increased mainly due to an increase in general and administrative expenses and an increase in allocation of corporate charges. Operating expenses were $59 and $45 for the ~~same period in the last fiscal year.~~three months ended December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively.

Real Estate Segment

The revenue, gross margin and loss from operations for the real estate segment for the ~~three months ended September 30,~~second quarters of fiscal 2015 and 2014 ~~and 2013~~ were as follows:

	Three Months Ended September 30,								Three Months Ended December 31,
(Unaudited)	2014				2013				2014				2013
Revenue		$	43			$	44			$	44			$	46
Gross margin			20.9	%			20.5	%			20.5	%			23.9	%
Loss from operations		$	(48	)		$	(23	)		$	(43	)		$	(22	)

Loss from operations in the real estate segment for the three months ended ~~September 30,~~December 31, 2014 was ~~$48,~~$43, an increase of ~~$25~~$21, as compared to $22 for the same period of the last fiscal year. The increase in operating loss was mainly due to a decrease in gross margin as discussed earlier and an increase in operating expense of $19. The operating expenses were $52 and $33 for the three months ended December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively. The increase in operating expenses as compared to the same quarter in last fiscal year was primarily due to an increase in travelling expenses and legal expenses.

Corporate

The loss from operations for corporate for the second quarters of fiscal 2015 and 2014 were as follows:

	Three Months Ended December 31,
(Unaudited)	2014				2013
Loss from operations		$	(126	)		$	(179	)

Corporate operating loss decreased by $53 to $126 for the three months ended December 31, 2014 from $179 in the same period of the last fiscal year. The decrease in operating loss was mainly due to a decrease in travel expenses and professional fees. Stock option expenses during the three months ended December 31, 2014 were $89 as compared to $86 for the same period of last fiscal year.

-35-

Comparison of the Six Months Ended December 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013

	Six Months Ended December 31,
	2014			2013
Revenue		100.0	%		100.0	%
Cost of sales		75.0			78.3
Gross Margin		25.0	%		21.7	%
Operating expenses:
General and administrative		20.2	%		19.5	%
Selling		1.7			2.2
Research and development		0.6			0.5
Impairment loss		0.4			0.0
Loss on disposal of property, plant and equipment		0.2			0.1
Total operating expenses		23.1	%		22.3	%
Income / (Loss) from Operations		1.9	%		(0.6	)%

Overall Gross Margin

Overall gross margin as a percentage of revenue increased by 3.3% to 25.0% for the six months ended December 31, 2014, from 21.7% in the same period of last fiscal year, primarily due to an increase in the gross profit margin in the testing segment, which was partially offset by a decrease in the gross profit margin in the manufacturing, distribution and real estate segments. In terms of absolute dollar amounts, gross profits increased by $162 to $4,240 for the six months ended December 31, 2014, from $4,078 for the same period of the last fiscal year.

Gross profit margin as a percentage of revenue in the manufacturing segment decreased by 3.6% to 12.4% for the six months ended December 31, 2014, from 16.0% in the same period of the last fiscal year. In absolute dollar amounts, the gross profit decreased by $579 to $796 for the six months ended December 31, 2014 as compared to $1,375 for the same period in last fiscal year. The decrease in absolute dollar amount of gross margin was primarily due to a decrease in revenue. The decrease in revenue was higher than the decrease in cost, resulting in the decrease in gross margin. The decrease in revenue in the Singapore operations was primarily due to the decrease in orders from one major customer, as discussed earlier.

Gross profit margin as a percentage of revenue in the testing segment increased by 6.5% to 33.9% for the six months ended December 31, 2014 from 27.4% in the same period of the last fiscal year. Our Tianjin operations in China, the Thailand operations and the U.S. operations increased their gross margin during the six months ended December 31, 2014 as compared to the same period of the last fiscal year, which was partially offset by the decrease in gross margin in the Suzhou operations in China, the Singapore operations, and the Malaysia operations. Thus, as the demand of services and factory utilization increases, the fixed costs are spread over the increased output, which increases the gross profit margin. In terms of absolute dollar amounts, gross profit in the testing segment increased by $919 to $3,286 for the six months ended December 31, 2014, from $2,367 for the same period of the last fiscal year. Gross profit in absolute dollar increased in our Tianjin operations in China, our Thailand operations and our U.S. operations, which profit was partially offset by the decrease in our Singapore operations and Suzhou operations in China.

Gross profit margin as a percentage of revenue in the distribution segment decreased by 3.5% to 17.1% for the six months ended December 31, 2014, from 20.6% for the same period of the last fiscal year. The decrease in gross margin was due to the change in product mix, as this segment had fewer sales of products with a higher profit margin as compared to the same period of last fiscal year. In terms of absolute dollar amounts, gross profit in the distribution segment for the six months ended December 31, 2014 was $140, a decrease of $176 as compared to $316 in the same period of the last fiscal year. The gross profit margin of the distribution segment was not only affected by the market price of our products, but also our product mix, which changes frequently as a result of changes in market demand.

-36-

Gross profit margin as a percentage of revenue in the real estate segment was 20.7% for the six months ended December 31, 2014, a decrease of 1.5% from 22.2% for the same period in the last fiscal year. In terms of absolute dollar amounts, gross profit in the real estate segment for the six months ended December 31, 2014 was $18, a decrease of $2 from $20 in the same period of the last fiscal year. The decrease in the gross profit margin as a percentage of revenue was due to a decrease in rental revenue compared to the costs, which are fixed. Certain rental agreements expired and were only renewed after a period of vacancy, as discussed above.

Operating Expenses

Operating expenses for the six months ended December 31, 2014 and 2013 were as follows:

	Six Months Ended December 31,
(Unaudited)	2014		2013
General and administrative	$	3,438	$	3,672
Selling		296		413
Research and development		94		101
Impairment loss		70		-
Loss on disposal of property, plant and equipment		28		11
Total	$	3,926	$	4,197

General and administrative expenses decreased by $234, or 6.4%, from $3,672 to $3,438 for the six months ended December 31, 2014 compared to the same period of the last fiscal year. The decrease in general and administrative expenses was primarily in the testing segment and in the corporate office in the U.S., which was partially offset by the increase in such expenses in the manufacturing segment, real estate segment and distribution segment. The decrease was mainly attributable to a decrease in stock option expenses by $111, traveling expenses, and professional fees in the corporate office, which were partially offset by an increase in general and administrative expenses such as salary and staff related expenses in the Tianjin operations for the six months ended December 31, 2014 as compared to the same period of last fiscal year.

Selling expenses decreased by $117, or 28.3 %, for the six months ended December 31, 2014, from $413 to $296 compared to the same period of the last fiscal year, which was mainly due to a decrease in commission expenses as a result of a decrease in commissionable sales and a decrease in travelling expenses in our Singapore operations.

Income / (Loss) from Operations

Income from operations was $314 for the six months ended December 31, 2014 as compared to a loss from operations of $119 for the same period of the last fiscal year. The change was mainly due to an increase in gross profit margin and a decrease in operating expenses, as discussed earlier.

Interest Expenses

Interest expenses for the six months ended December 31, 2014 and 2013 were as follows:

	Six Months Ended December 31,
(Unaudited)	2014			2013
Interest expenses	$	(122	)	$	(134	)

Interest expenses decreased by $12 to $122 from $134 for the six months ended December 31, 2014 as compared to the same period of the last fiscal year due to repayment of credit facilities by the Singapore operation.

-37-

Income Tax Benefit / (Expenses)

Income tax expense for the six months ended December 31, 2014 was $86, as compared to income tax benefit of $82 for the same period of the last fiscal year. The increase in income tax expense was mainly due to tax provision in the Tianjin operations in China and due to deferred tax for the timing difference recorded for the six months ended December 2014 as compared to the same period in the previous fiscal year. Tax expenses included $66, representing the tax withheld by the China and Malaysia subsidiaries for the payments made to the Singapore subsidiary that is not recoverable. The tax withheld by the China and Malaysia subsidiaries was paid to the inland revenue department of the respective countries.

Non-controlling Interest

As of December 31, 2014, we held a 55% interest in Trio-Tech Malaysia, Trio-Tech (Kuala Lumpur) Sdn. Bhd., SHI International Pte. Ltd. and PTSHI Indonesia, and a 76% interest in Prestal Enterprise Sdn. Bhd. The non-controlling interest for the six months ended December 31, 2014, in the net income of subsidiaries, was $210 as compared to the non-controlling interest in the net loss of $98 for the same period of last fiscal year. The increase in the non-controlling interest in the net income of subsidiaries was attributable to the increase in net income generated by the Malaysia testing operation as a result of an increase in revenue as compared to the same period in the prior fiscal year.

Income / (Loss) from Discontinued Operations

Income from discontinued operations was $20 for the six months ended December 31, 2014 as compared to a loss of ~~$23~~$72 for the same period of the last fiscal year. The other income in the discontinued operations was higher during the six months ended December 31, 2014, which was partially offset by the higher general and administrative expenses as compared to the same period in the last fiscal year.

Net Loss

Net loss was $30 for the six months ended December 31, 2014, a decrease of $352 as compared to $382 for the same period in the last fiscal year. The decrease in net loss was mainly due to an increase in gross margin and a decrease in operating expenses as discussed above.

Loss per Share

Basic and diluted loss per share from continuing operations for the six months ended December 31, 2014 was $0.01 compared to basic and diluted loss per share of $0.10 in the same period of last fiscal year. Decrease in loss per share was mainly due to higher gross margin and lower operating expenses for the six months ending December 31, 2014, as discussed earlier.

Basic and diluted loss per share from discontinued operations for the six months ended December 31, 2014 was nil compared to basic and diluted loss per share of $0.01 in the same period of last fiscal year. Because the operations were discontinued in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2013, expenses continued incurred during the six months ended December 2013. There were no such expenses for the six months ended December 31, 2014.

-38-

Segment Information

The revenue, gross profit margin, and income or loss from each segment for the six months ended December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively, are presented below. As the segment revenue and gross margin for each segment have been discussed in the previous section, only the comparison of income from operations is discussed below.

Manufacturing Segment

The revenue, gross margin and loss from operations for the manufacturing segment for the six months ended December 31, 2014 and 2013 were as follows:

	Six Months Ended December 31,
(Unaudited)	2014				2013
Revenue		$	6,395			$	8,569
Gross margin			12.4	%			16.0	%
Loss from operations		$	(735	)		$	(328	)

Loss from operations from the manufacturing segment increased by $407 to $735 for the six months ended December 31, 2014 from $328 in the same period of the last fiscal year, primarily due to a decrease in revenue by $2,174, resulting in a decrease in gross profit by $579, as discussed earlier. Operating expenses for the manufacturing segment were $1,531 and $1,703 for the six months ended December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively. The decrease in operating expenses of $172 was mainly due to a decrease in selling expenses, a decrease in allocation of corporate charges, a decrease in research and development expenses and a decrease in gain on disposal of property, plant and equipment. The decrease was partially offset by the increase in general and administrative expenses and an increase in impairment of fixed assets. Corporate expenses charged in fiscal 2014 were based on a pre-determined fixed amount, which was higher than the previous fiscal year in the Singapore operations for the six months ended December 31, 2014. The impairment was due to certain equipment in the Tianjin operations in China found not suitable to test customer’s products and hence the decision to impair this asset.

Testing Segment

The revenue, gross margin and income from operations for the testing segment for the six months ended December 31, 2014 and 2013 were as follows:

	Six Months Ended December 31,
(Unaudited)	2014			2013
Revenue	$	9,691			$	8,645
Gross margin		33.9	%			27.4	%
Income from operations	$	1,274			$	391

Income from operations in the testing segment for the six months ended December 31, 2014 was $1,274, an increase of $883 compared to $391 in the same period of the last fiscal year. The increase in operating income was attributable to an increase of $919 in gross profit, which was partially offset by an increase of $36 in operating expenses. Operating expenses were $2,012 and $1,976 for the six months ended December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively. The increase in operating expenses was mainly attributable to an increase in the operating expenses in our Tianjin operations in China and in our Singapore operations, which were partially offset by a decrease in the operating expenses in our Malaysia operations, in our Suzhou operations in China and in our Thailand operations.

-39-

Distribution Segment

The revenue, gross margin and income from operations for the distribution segment for the six months ended December 31, 2014 and 2013 were as follows:

	Six Months Ended December 31,
(Unaudited)	2014			2013
Revenue	$	817		$	1,532
Gross margin		17.1	%		20.6	%
Income from operations	$	-		$	199

Income from operations in the distribution segment decreased by $199 to nil for the six months ended December 31, 2014 from $199 for the same period of last year. The decrease in operating income was mainly due to a decrease in revenue and a decrease in gross profit, as discussed earlier. Gross profit decreased by $176 and operating expenses increased by $23. Operating expenses were $140 and $117 for the six months ended December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively. The increase in operating expenses was mainly due to an increase in general and administrative expenses and an increase in allocation of corporate expenses on a predetermined fixed charge basis, which was higher than that of the same period in last fiscal year. These increases were partially offset by the decrease in selling expenses caused by the decrease in commission expenses due to a decrease in commissionable sales.

Real Estate Segment

The revenue, gross margin and loss from operations for the real estate segment for the six months ended December 31, 2014 and 2013 were as follows:

	Six Months Ended December 31,
(Unaudited)	2014			2013
Revenue	$	87		$	90
Gross margin		20.7	%		22.2	%
Loss from operations	$	(91	)	$	(45	)

Loss from operations in the real estate segment for the six months ended December 31, 2014 was $91, an increase of $46 compared to a loss of $45 for the same period of the last fiscal year. The increase in operating loss was mainly due to an increase in ~~allowance for doubtful receivables~~operating expenses, and ~~legal expenses. Revenue and~~a decrease in gross margin, ~~did not change significantly, however the operating~~as discussed earlier. Operating expenses increased by ~~$25. The operating expenses were $57 and $32~~$44 to $109 for the ~~three~~six months ended ~~September 30,~~December 31, 2014 ~~and 2013, respectively.~~as compared to $65 for the same period in the last fiscal year. The increase in operating expenses was mainly due to an increase in legal ~~expenses and an increase in~~fees, which was partially offset by the lower allowance for doubtful receivables for the six months ended December 31, 2014 as compared to the same period in last fiscal year, as previously discussed.

Corporate

The loss from operations for corporate for the six months ended December 31, 2014 and 2013 were as follows:

	Six Months Ended December 31,
(Unaudited)	2014			2013
Loss from operations	$	(134	)	$	(336	)

Operating losses in the corporate office for the six months ended December 31, 2014 was $134, a decrease of $202, as compared to $336 for the same period of the last fiscal year. This was mainly due to a decrease in stock option expenses, travel expenses, and professional fees. The stock option expenses for the six months ended December 31, 2014 were $89, a decrease of $111 from $200 for the same period in the last fiscal year.

~~-29-~~-40-

~~Table of Contents~~

~~Corporate~~

~~The loss from operations for Corporate for the three months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013 was as follows:~~

Three Months Ended
September 30,

(Unaudited) 2014 2013
Loss from operations

$
(8
)

$
(157
)

Corporate operating losses were $8 for the three months ended September 30, 2014, a decrease of $149, from an operating loss of $157 in the same period of the last fiscal year. The decrease in operating losses was mainly due to stock option expenses and travel expenses. There were no stock options granted in the first quarter of fiscal year 2015 as compared to the 75,000 options granted during the same period in last fiscal year. The stock option expenses for the first quarter of fiscal year 2015 was $9, a decrease of $105 as compared to $114 for the same period in the last fiscal year.

Financial Condition

During the ~~three~~six months ended ~~September 30,~~December 31, 2014 total assets decreased by ~~$1,255~~$1,720, from $34,590 as at June 30, 2014 to ~~$33,335~~$32,870 as at ~~September 30,~~December 31, 2014. The decrease in total assets was primarily due to a decrease in cash and cash equivalents, trade accounts ~~receivable,~~receivables, deferred tax assets, investment properties, ~~in China,~~ property, plant and equipment, loans receivable from property development projects and restricted term deposits, ~~but was~~though partially offset by an increase in other receivables, inventories, prepaid expenses, and other assets.

Cash and cash equivalents were ~~$2,157~~$2,409 as at ~~September 30,~~December 31, 2014, reflecting a decrease of ~~$781~~$529 from $2,938 as at June 30, 2014, primarily due to ~~payment of lines of credit~~payments for loans, and ~~bank loans payable.~~dividends in the Malaysia operation, and decreased collections from customers in the Suzhou, China operation. Collections from customers in Suzhou were less due to a decrease in sales for the six months ended December 31, 2014 as compared to the same period last fiscal year. This cash outflow was partially offset by the cash inflow from increase in collections from customers in Tianjin in China, Singapore and Thailand operations. The total sales decreased by $1,846 for the six months ended December 31, 2014 from $18,836 to $16,990 as compared to the same period last fiscal year.

At ~~September 30,~~December 31, 2014, the trade accounts receivable balance decreased by ~~$775~~$393 to ~~$7,850,~~$8,232 from $8,625 as at June 30, 2014, primarily due to ~~an improvement in the collection and the~~a decrease in revenue in the Singapore ~~manufacturing~~ and ~~distribution operations, and the Malaysia test~~China operations for the ~~first three months~~second quarter of fiscal ~~year 2015 as compared to the revenue in the fourth quarter of last fiscal year.~~2015. The number of days’ sales outstanding ~~in accounts receivables~~ was 9694 days at the end of the ~~first~~second quarter of fiscal ~~year~~ 2015 compared to 87 days inat the end of the of fiscal year 2014. The increase in days’ sales outstanding ~~in accounts receivable~~ was primarily due to ~~a decrease in receivables lower than the decrease in revenue~~higher sales in the ~~first three months period in fiscal year 2015~~month ended December 31, 2014, as compared to the year-end of last fiscal year.

At ~~September 30,~~December 31, 2014, other receivables were ~~$413,~~$405, reflecting an increase of ~~$102~~$94 from $311 as at June 30, 2014. The increase was primarily due to the increase in advance payment ~~to suppliers~~ in our Singapore and Tianjin operations and the decrease in goods and services taxes claimable, as the sales ~~during the three months ended September 30, 2014~~ were higher than the purchases during the ~~same period.~~six months ended December 31, 2014.

Inventory at ~~September 30,~~December 31, 2014 was ~~$1,494,~~$1,450, an increase of ~~$388, or 35.1%,~~$344 compared to $1,106 as at June 30, 2014. The increase in inventory was mainly due to an increase in the work in progress, raw material and ~~work in progress as a result of increased procurement~~finished goods in the ~~first~~Singapore operations in the second quarter ~~by the Singapore operation~~of fiscal 2015, as compared to the fourth quarter of fiscal ~~year~~ 2014. The number of days’ inventory held was 67 days at the end of the ~~first~~second quarter of fiscal ~~year~~ 2015 ~~was 74 days as~~ compared to 66 days inat the end of fiscal year 2014. The higher ~~days'~~days’ inventory on hand was due to a decrease in ~~usage~~utilization of the inventory by the Singapore ~~operations and the U.S. operations~~operation in the ~~first quarter of fiscal year 2015~~six month period ended December 31, 2014, as compared to the ~~usage in the last~~year end of fiscal ~~year. The decrease in usage was due to decrease in revenue during this period as discussed earlier.~~2014.

Prepaid expenses and other current assets were ~~$260~~$263 as at ~~September 30,~~December 31, 2014 compared to $205 as at June 30, 2014. The increase of ~~$55~~$58 was primarily due to ~~prepayment~~prepayments for software license fees for Singapore operations and prepayments for insurance by the U.S., Singapore, Malaysia and ~~U.S.~~China operations.

Investment properties in China and Malaysia at ~~September 30,~~December 31, 2014 were ~~$1,752,~~$1,703, a decrease of ~~$13~~$62 from $1,765 as at June 30, 2014. The decrease was primarily due to depreciation charged and by the foreign exchange fluctuations for the ~~three~~six months ended ~~September 30,~~December 31, 2014.

Property, plant and equipment decreased by ~~$215~~$945 from $13,541 as at June 30, 2014 to ~~$13,326~~$12,596 as at ~~September 30,~~December 31, 2014, mainly due to depreciation charges of ~~$623, which~~$1,189, disposal of certain property, plant and equipment in the Suzhou operations and impairment in the Singapore and Tianjin operations. These decreases were ~~higher than~~partially offset by the capital expenditures of ~~$467~~$934 incurred mainly in the Malaysia and Singapore operations and in Tianjin and Suzhou ~~operations~~ in the China ~~operations, and the foreign currency exchange difference between the functional currency dollars and U.S. dollars for the three months ended September 30, 2014.~~

~~-30-~~

~~Table of Contents~~

operations.

~~Other assets~~Restricted term deposits as at September 30, 2014 increased by $43 to $1,306, compared to $1,263 as at June 30, 2014. The increase in other assets was primarily due to a down payment for fixed assets by the Tianjin and Malaysia operations during the three months ended September 30, 2014.

~~Restricted cash as at September 30,~~December 31, 2014 decreased by ~~$64~~$197 to ~~$3,477,~~$3,344, as compared to $3,541 as at June 30, 2014. This was due to the foreign currency exchange difference between functional currency and the U.S. ~~dollars~~dollar from June 30, 2014 to ~~September~~December 31, 2014.

-41-

At December 31, 2014, loans receivable from property development projects were nil, compared to $805 as at June 30, 2014. The balances were transferred during the quarter ended December 31, 2014 ~~and further~~as a down payment for the purchase of property in China.

Other assets as at December 31, 2014 increased by $734 to $1,997, compared to $1,263 as at June 30, 2014. The increase in other assets was primarily due to down payment for fixed assets in the ~~interest income from the restricted deposits.~~Malaysia operations and Tianjin and Chongqing operations in China.

Lines of credit as at ~~September 30,~~December 31, 2014 decreased by ~~$719~~$1,078 to ~~$3,048,~~$2,689, compared to $3,767 as at June 30, 2014. ~~This~~The decrease in lines of credit was mainly due to re-payment of credit facility by the Singapore operations, which was partially offset by new lines of credit availed in our Malaysia operations.

Trade accounts payable as at December 31, 2014 increased by $170 to $3,332 from $3,162 as at June 30, 2014. The increase was mainly due to the ~~payment made~~Singapore and China operations maximizing the credit terms offered by the suppliers.

Total bank loans payable as at December 31, 2014 decreased by $570 to $2,476 from $3,046, mainly due to repayment by our Singapore and Malaysia operations, ~~to settle~~and one of the ~~credit facility.~~loans that was outstanding as at June 30, 2014 was settled as at December 31, 2014.

Liquidity Comparison

Net cash provided by operating activities decreased by ~~$747~~$456 to ~~an inflow of $466~~$1,745 for the ~~three~~six months ended ~~September 30,~~December 31, 2014, ~~from an inflow of $1,213~~compared to $2,201 in the same period of the last fiscal year. The decrease in net cash ~~inflow~~generated by operating activities was primarily due to ~~changes~~a decrease in ~~operating assets and~~other receivables by $1,556, a decrease in other non-current liabilities by ~~$594~~$26 and a decrease in inventories by $1,510, which were partially offset by an increase in accounts receivables by $858, an increase in other assets by $994, an increase in prepaid expenses and other current assets by $29, an increase in accounts payable by $570, and an increase in ~~operating loss~~income tax payable by ~~$164, as previously discussed.~~$47.

Net cash used in investing activities ~~increased~~decreased by ~~$11~~$807 to ~~an outflow of $467~~$883 for the ~~three~~six months ended ~~September 30,~~December 31, 2014, ~~from an outflow of $456~~compared to $1,690 for the same period of the last fiscal year. The decrease in cash ~~inflow from disposal of property, plant and equipment decreased by $28 as compared to the same period~~outflow in the ~~prior fiscal year, which~~investing activities was ~~partially offset by the~~primarily due to a decrease in capital spending by ~~$17,~~$822 during the ~~three~~six months ended ~~September 30,~~December 31, 2014.

Net cash used in financing activities for the ~~three~~six months ended ~~September 30,~~December 31, 2014 was ~~$950,~~$1,332, representing an increase of $661 compared to $671 during the same period of the last fiscal year. The increase in outflow was mainly due to an increase in repayment of lines of credit by $446, a decrease ~~of $4 compared to net cash outflow of $954 during the three months ended September 30, 2013. In the first quarter of fiscal year 2014 the cash inflow due to~~in proceeds from long-term bank loans by $36, and there were no proceeds from the exercise of stock ~~option and proceeds from bank loan~~options as compared to the same period of last fiscal year. The increase in outflow in financing activities was ~~$134 and $66 respectively. There was no such cash inflow in the first quarter of fiscal year 2015 which caused the decrease. This decrease was~~partially offset by ~~the lower~~a decrease in repayment of ~~a line of credit and repayment of a~~ bank ~~loan~~loans and capital ~~lease~~leases of $83 in our Singapore ~~and Malaysia operations~~operation, while there were no dividends paid to a non-controlling interest during the six months ended December 31, 2014, as compared to dividends paid to a non-controlling interest of $80 in the same period of last fiscal year.

We believe that our projected cash flows from operations, borrowing availability under our revolving lines of credit, cash on hand, trade credit and the secured bank loan will provide the necessary financial resources to meet our projected cash requirements for at least the next 12 months.

Critical Accounting Estimates & Policies

~~There~~During the six months ended December 31, 2014 there have been no significant changes in the critical accounting policies, except as disclosed in “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” included in the most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K.

ITEM ~~3. Q~~UA3~~NTITATIVE~~. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

Not applicable.

ITEM ~~4. CONT~~RO4LS. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

An evaluation was carried out by the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) or 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) as of ~~September 30,~~December 31, 2014, the end of the period covered by this Form 10-Q. Based upon that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that these disclosure controls and procedures were effective at a reasonable level.

During the period covered by this report, there have been no changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting that have materially affected or are reasonably likely to materially affect the Company’s internal control overall financial reporting.

~~-31-~~-42-

~~Table of Contents~~

TRIO-TECH INTERNATIONAL

PART II. OTHER ~~INF~~OR~~MATION~~INFORMATION

Item 1.1. Legal Proc~~eedings~~Proceedings

Not applicable.

Item ~~1A.~~1A. Risk Fac~~tors~~Factors

Not ~~applicable~~applicable.

Item ~~2. Unregiste~~2~~red~~. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

Malaysia and Singapore regulations prohibit the payment of dividends if the Company does not have sufficient retained earnings and tax credit. In addition, the payment of dividends can only be made after making deductions for income tax pursuant to the regulations. Furthermore, the cash movements from the Company’s 55% owned Malaysian subsidiary to overseas are restricted and must be authorized by the Central Bank of Malaysia. California law also prohibits the payment of dividends if the Company does not have sufficient retained earnings or cannot meet certain asset to liability ratios.

Item 3.3. Defaults UponUpon Senior Securities

Not applicable.

Item 4.4. Mine Safety ~~Disc~~lo~~sures~~Disclosures

Not applicable.

Item 5.5. Other ~~Inf~~or~~mation~~Information

Not applicable.

Item ~~6. Exhi~~b6~~its~~. Exhibits

31.1		Rule 13a-14(a) Certification of Principal Executive Officer of Registrant

31.2		Rule 13a-14(a) Certification of Principal Financial Officer of Registrant

32		Section 1350 Certification

101.INS* XBRL Instance Document

101.SCH* XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema

101.CAL* XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase

101.DEF* XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase

101.LAB* XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase

101.PRE* XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase

~~101.INS* XBRL Instance Document~~

~~101.SCH* XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema~~

~~101.CAL* XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase~~

~~101.DEF* XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase~~

~~101.LAB* XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase~~

~~101.PRE* XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase~~

* Pursuant to Rule 406T of Regulation S-T, the XBRL (Extensible Business Reporting Language) information included in Exhibit 101 hereto is deemed furnished and not filed or part of a registration statement or prospectus for purposes of Sections 11 or 12 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or deemed not filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and otherwise is not subject to liability under these sections.

~~-32-~~-43-

~~Table of Contents~~

~~SIGN~~AT~~URES~~SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

	TRIO-TECH INTERNATIONAL
	~~By:~~	~~/s/~~By: /s/ Victor H.M. Ting VICTOR H.M. TING Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer) Dated: ~~November 19, 2014~~ February 17, 2015

~~-33-~~

	Three Months Ended
	Sept. 30,			Sept. 30,
	2014			2013
Revenue
Products	$	3,432		$	5,405
Testing services		4,618			4,048
Others		43			44

		8,093			9,497
Cost of Sales
Cost of products sold		3,213			4,346
Cost of testing services rendered		3,049			3,025
Others		34			35

		6,296			7,406

Gross Margin		1,797			2,091

Operating Expenses:
General and administrative		1,738			1,834
Selling		131			205
Research and development		47			52
Impairment loss of property, plant and equipment		15			-
Loss on disposal of property, plant and equipment		-			13
Total operating expenses		1,931			2,104

Loss from Operations		(134	)		(13	)

Other Income / (Expenses)
Interest expenses		(64	)		(68	)
Other income, net		46			164
Total other (expenses) / income		(18	)		96

(Loss) / Income from Continuing Operations before Income Taxes		(152	)		83

Income Tax Benefits		46			43

(Loss) / Income from continuing operations before non-controlling interest, net of tax		(106	)		126

Other Operating Activities
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated joint venture, net of tax		-			-

Discontinued Operations (Note 19)
Income / (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax		26			(42	)
NET (LOSS) / INCOME		(80	)		84

Less: net income attributable to the non-controlling interest		56			101
Net Loss Attributable to Trio-Tech International Common Shareholder	$	(136	)	$	(17	)

Amounts Attributable to Trio-Tech International Common Shareholders:
(Loss) / income from continuing operations, net of tax		(150	)		6
Income / (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax		14			(23	)
Net Loss Attributable to Trio-Tech International Common Shareholders	$	(136	)	$	(17	)

Comprehensive Income / (Loss) Attributable to Trio-Tech International Common Shareholders:

Net (loss) / income		(80	)		84
Foreign currency translation, net of tax		160			(183	)
Comprehensive Income / (Loss)		80			(99	)
Less: comprehensive income / (loss) attributable to the non-controlling interest		113			(4	)
Comprehensive Loss Attributable to Trio-Tech International Common Shareholders	$	(33	)	$	(95	)

Basic and Diluted Loss per Share:
Basic and diluted loss per share from continuing operations attributable to Trio-Tech International	$	(0.04	)	$	-
Basic and diluted loss per share from discontinued operations attributable to Trio-Tech International	$	-		$	(0.01	)
Basic and Diluted Loss per Share from Net Loss
Attributable to Trio-Tech International	$	(0.04	)	$	(0.01	)

Weighted average number of common shares outstanding
Basic		3,513			3,399
Dilutive effect of stock options		-			-
Number of shares used to compute earnings per share diluted		3,513			3,399

	Options		Weighted Average Exercise Price		Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Term (Years)		Aggregate Intrinsic Value

Outstanding at July 1, 2014		315,000	$	3.62		2.63	$	24
Granted		-		-		-		-
Exercised		-		-		-		-
Forfeited or expired		-		-		-		-
Outstanding at September 30, 2014		315,000	$	3.62		2.37	$	151
Exercisable at September 30, 2014		315,000	$	3.62		2.37	$	151

	Three Months Ended
	Sept. 30, 2014			Sept. 30, 2013
	(Unaudited)			(Unaudited)
(Loss) / income attributable to Trio-Tech International common shareholders from continuing operations, net of tax	$	(150	)	$	6
Income/ (loss) attributable to Trio-Tech International common shareholders from discontinued operations, net of tax		14			(23	)
Net loss attributable to Trio-Tech International common shareholders	$	(136	)	$	(17	)

Basic and diluted loss per share from continuing operations attributable to Trio-Tech International		(0.04	)		-

Basic and diluted loss per share from discontinued operations attributable to Trio-Tech International		-			(0.01	)
Basic and diluted loss per share from net loss attributable to Trio-Tech International	$	(0.04	)	$	(0.01	)

Weighted average number of common shares outstanding - basic		3,513			3,399
Dilutive effect of stock options		-			-
Number of shares used to compute earnings per share – diluted		3,513			3,399

	Investment Date	Investment Amount (RM)			Investment Amount (U.S. Dollars)
Reclassification of rental property – Penang Property I	Dec 31, 2012		681			208
Gross investment in rental property			681			208
Accumulated depreciation on rental property			(302	)		(92	)
Net investment in property – Malaysia			379			116

	Loan Expiry Date	Loan Amount (RMB)			Loan Amount (U.S. Dollars)
Short-term loan receivables
JiangHuai (Project – Yu Jin Jiang An)	May 31,2013		2,000			325
Less: allowance for impairment	Dec 31, 2013		(2,000	)		(325	)
Net short-term loan receivables			-			-

Long-term loan receivables
Jun Zhou Zhi Ye	Oct 31, 2016		5,000			814
Net loan-term loan receivables from property development projects			5,000			814

	Three Months Ended Sept. 30,	Net Revenue		Operating (Loss) Income			Total Assets		Depr. And Amort.		Capital Expenditures
Manufacturing	2014	$	3,047	$	(618	)	$	10,437	$	27	$	17
	2013		4,201		(127	)		11,869		39		130

Testing Services	2014		4,618		576			18,471		569		444
	2013		4,048		102			18,149		536		354

Distribution	2014		385		(36	)		494		-		6
	2013		1,204		192			678		-		-

Real Estate	2014		43		(48	)		3,807		27		-
	2013		44		(23	)		4,134		27		-

Fabrication	2014		-		-			51		-		-
Services *	2013		-		-			126		-		-

Corporate &	2014		-		(8	)		75		-		-
Unallocated	2013		-		(157	)		79		-		-

Total Company	2014	$	8,093	$	(134	)	$	33,335	$	623	$	467
	2013	$	9,497	$	(13	)	$	35,035	$	602	$	484

	Sept. 30, 2014 (Unaudited)			June 30, 2014
Note payable denominated in Malaysian ringgit to a commercial bank for infrastructure investment, maturing in August 2024, bearing interest at the bank’s prime rate (4.6% and 5.1% at September 30, 2014) per annum, with monthly payments of principal plus interest through August 2024, collateralized by the acquired building with a carrying value of $3,804.		2,692			2,786

Note payable denominated in U.S., dollars to a financial institution for working capital plans in Singapore and its subsidiaries, maturing in December 2014, bearing interest at the bank’s prime rate plus 1.50% (4.75% at September 30, 2014) with monthly payments of principal plus interest through December 2014. This note payable is secured by plant and equipment with a carrying value of $429.		104			260

Current portion		(292	)		(448	)
Long term portion of bank loans payable	$	2,504		$	2,598

	For the Quarter Ended September 30,
	2014			2013
Investment income deemed interest income	$	51			49
Interest income		3			3
Other rental income		26			51
Exchange (loss) / gain		(10	)		38
Usage of inventory previously provided for obsolescence		-			17
Allowance for doubtful deemed interest receivables		(51	)		-
Other miscellaneous income		27			6
Total	$	46		$	164